Slashdot Mirror


Modding Laser Tag Gear?

digitalsushi writes "With summer here again our thoughts turn to the outdoors, and for two years, my peers and I have tried to find plans online for augmenting our laser tag gear to make it more realistic. We're not engineers, but also figured it can't be that hard to do something with some kind of infrared laser to decrease the beam width. What other sorts of inexpensive things could be added to our gear to make it more interesting? We're using the popular Laser Challenge V2 kits, but any brand at all would be interesting."

599 comments

  1. Bouncing by andyrut · · Score: 1, Funny

    What other sorts of inexpensive things could be added to our gear to make it more interesting?

    If the sole interest is in making it more interesting, I would suggest attaching mirrors over the electronic targets on your person. This would not only effectively block your opponents shots, but makes them likely to bounce back and hit the attacker.

    1. Re:Bouncing by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      But what would happen to the bounced back shot if there was a mirror attached to it as well? ;-)

      Is it SO hard to use Plain Text Links?

    2. Re:Bouncing by andyrut · · Score: 1

      But what would happen to the bounced back shot if there was a mirror attached to it as well? ;-)

      It would result in a never-ending stream of laser fire in which no one would actually lose or gain points!

    3. Re:Bouncing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      light bouncing back and forth between two mirrors... so if the mirrors are aligned just so, and you keep feeding energy into the system, you might end up with... a laser?

    4. Re:Bouncing by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Or you if plan to do some indoor laser tagging, you can smoke up the whole room so you can really see the laser. Of course I recommend using something legal to smoke up the room. (cough)

    5. Re:Bouncing by kpansky · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can see you've never taken basic photonic physics or even and introductory EE course. Lasers are coherent radiation. Without some very inefficient, energy wasting filters, you will not be able to create a coherent laser from a non-coherent source.

      --

      --Kevin
    6. Re:Bouncing by grahamdrew · · Score: 1

      ... much like a futuristic war in Iraq.

      --
      // Dumps core here
    7. Re:Bouncing by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Lot's of laser light is generated from non-coherent sources. Flash lamps are a common means of exciting the lasing medium. What makes the light from a laser coherent is the fact that the mirrors form a resonant cavity.

    8. Re:Bouncing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It pleases me when someone (grandparent) brings the uber-nerd smackdown... only to be wrong.

      Wonder if he'll come back around to defend his claim?

    9. Re:Bouncing by L0C0loco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What you are looking to use is something called a "corner cube" or "retro reflector". It has the property of sending the incident light back in exactly the direction it came from. So your attacker would very effectively shoot himself. You might be able to use some of that retro-reflecting tape that some runners/cyclists use to be more easily seen during dawn/dusk. It is not as efficient as a good quality corner cube, but it doesn't cost several hundred dollars either.

      To address the query posed by the lead author, a beam expander will reduce the divergence of the laser beam and "tighten up" the pattern. Again, they are not cheap, you might want to experiment using an old, cheap rifle scope on the end of your weapon as a beam expander.

      Enjoy,

      --
      -- Instant Karma's gonna get you! [320848 = 2*2*2*2*11*1823]
    10. Re:Bouncing by rickst13 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      But what would happen to the bounced back shot if there was a mirror attached to it as well? ;-) Oh, come on mods... how is this not modded redundant?

    11. Re:Bouncing by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 2, Funny

      oh come on mods, how is this not modded off topic?

    12. Re:Bouncing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see youve never passed basic level humour skills.

    13. Re:Bouncing by texas · · Score: 1

      Have you taken any of these courses you speak of? An introductory EE course usually focuses on circuit theory (Ohm's and Kirchoff's laws, basic RLC circuits). Usually, one needs to get to the electromagnetics courses to start talking about lasing. But that's beside the point.

      As far as creating a "coherent laser" (I'd like to see a non-coherent laser), most of the time they ARE created from non-coherent sources. The lasing medium has to be "pumped" (usually with a high-voltage pulse or flash tube) to create a population inversion (more excited atoms than ground-state atoms), which is what starts the stiumlated emission of photons. The amplification comes because the incoming photon is not absorbed by the atom, and you end up with a second emitted photon of identical phase. The atom then has to be pumped again to maintain the population inversion.

      Whatever the lasing medium (ruby, HeNe, YAg, blah blah blah), mirrors are used at each end to amplify the light in a particular plane, even though the medium itself will have photons bouncing around inside it in all directions. You get laser light out of the end of the medium, but inside it is still non-coherent.

      As for "inefficient, energy wasting filters," actually, dielectric mirrors that reflect close to 100% of the light are often used. Hardly inefficient.

      That said, this is just what I remember from sidebar discussions during undergrad electromagnetics and solid state physics. I haven't actually taken an optics class, so my understanding might be a little simplistic, or even slightly misconstrued. Anyone care to elaborate or correct?

      --
      Hey, how'd you know I was lookin' at you if you weren't lookin' at me?
  2. outfoors?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    "our thoughts turn to the outdoors"

    You sir are, obviously, not a Slashdot reader :)

    1. Re:outfoors?? by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      I didn't type that with a straight face.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:outfoors?? by Cyberhwk · · Score: 1

      I go outdoors. Its just that my outdoors has a much smaller space between said doors than everyone elses and I can lock everyone else out of my outdoors. I am also protected from rain and other elemental problems.

    3. Re:outfoors?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your parents basement is not outdoors no matter how damp and moldy it is.

  3. Dear Tron Guy by mfh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please mod your Tron suit for Laser tag.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Dear Tron Guy by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Tron Guy,

      Please don't.

      Thanks,

      The Entire World

    2. Re:Dear Tron Guy by Paul+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Funny

      P.S. Get a cup.

    3. Re:Dear Tron Guy by rasjani · · Score: 1

      O H M Y G O D !! i c a n s e e h i s t e s t i c l e s !!!

      --
      yush
    4. Re:Dear Tron Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tron? Check out this guy fitted with electroluminescent wire:
      http://www.glowire.com/

      With a simple microcontroller, you could change limbs or torso red when they are hit:
      http://www.parallax.com/html_pages/products/ basics tamps/basic_stamps.asp

    5. Re:Dear Tron Guy by JAD+lifter · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Tron Guy could easily end up being the new goatsx guy. That jpeg is just disturbing.

    6. Re:Dear Tron Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd like to make it more realistic, these may come in handy. They appear to still be in the developmental stage, so expensive, but if you could make a suit lined with them on the inside, you could simulate the laser burn effect, probably drastically increasing the rate at which your friends compete/run.

      http://news.com.com/Start-up+develops+tiny+hot+p la te+that+burns+like+Venus/2100-7337_3-5256018.html

  4. How about.. by _14k4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Upgrading to the real thing?

    Paintball? ;)

    1. Re:How about.. by Scottarius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I second that. Lasers tag will never compare to the thrill of paintball. Everything is much more exciting when it actually hurts to get shot.

    2. Re:How about.. by afidel · · Score: 3, Funny

      We used to use pellet guns. A bunch of crazy kids running around in winter coats in the middle of summer with weapons tends to draw all sorts of unwanted attention from the local constibulary for some odd reason =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AIRSOFT... That's pretty damn real.

    4. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about having one guy with laser tag gear and the other with a paintball gun.. Now THAT would be interesting.

    5. Re:How about.. by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Try airsoft. Paintball is nice, but you don't get the real feeling of airsoft.

      The basic premise is that the guns are VERY realistic, shoot .25g pellets, and are extremely moddable. I have a Walther p-99, a Colt M-4, and a psg-1. People see me walking out from my apartment and they get afraid.

      In the US, most of the guns have red tips. But you can order the gun from overseas and have the red tip removed once it arrives.

      They are also fairly accurate. My M-4 can hit 40 out of 40 at about 20 meters. While not as impressive as paintball accuracy, it gives the game a more in-your-face feel. My psg-1 can hit from 100 meters fairly well...depending on wind.

      The pistols use gas charges and fire about 30 rounds between refils. The rifles use electric and can sustain 50 rounds (the limit of my magazine) with no prob and I have shot close to 1000 rounds between batteries.

      Seriously, check into it.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    6. Re:How about.. by MrFluffyPants26 · · Score: 1

      I recall him saying "inexpensive." From what I understand, Airsoft can get quite pricey.

    7. Re:How about.. by strictnein · · Score: 1

      ok... but how much does that hurt when you get hit?

    8. Re:How about.. by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People see me walking out from my apartment and they get afraid.

      In the US, most of the guns have red tips. But you can order the gun from overseas and have the red tip removed once it arrives.


      You walk out of your apartment with your guns visible? Handguns with the red tips removed?

      I'm own 5 handguns and with the exception of shotguns and rifles (which are impossible to take from your home to vehicle without being seen), I don't want anyone to see me with my guns. Aside from the fact that advertising you have handguns is probably a good way to get your house broken into and having them stolen, brandishing a fake weapon can get you arrested or at the very least having a cop detain you at gun point.

    9. Re:How about.. by i_c_andrade · · Score: 2, Informative

      Remove that red tip and then you get visits from your friends in the local PD and ATF. People walking around with guns (even fake guns) are treated seriously. Fake guns look sufficently real from a few feet. Why do you think all the realistic waterguns come in neon colors, but "accurate" in design?

    10. Re:How about.. by Digz · · Score: 1

      Not much more than a paintball.

      --
      SYS 64738
    11. Re:How about.. by Unnngh! · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Agreed. I own a handgun as well. I also go paintballing but the marker looks nothing like a gun and I am not afraid it will be confused with one. I've played airsoft once...In the U.S., as I understand it, it's illegal to be in possession of an airsoft gun that does not have a red tip. This is hearsay through secondhand sources though so I don't know if that's really the law.

      At any rate, weilding something that appears to be a gun in public != good idea.

    12. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      It doesn't hurt at all.

      Harvey One-Eye

    13. Re:How about.. by Joe+Sixpacks · · Score: 1

      ah yes, paint ball. where you can stand 50 ft from someone and dodge the paint balls. Nery realistic. Yes I played, no I don't anymore. I stop when all the group I could find were filled with wackos that couldn't cut the actually military bacause the military had it out against them. Now I have more important things to do(to me, obviously) so I haven't bothered to continue any interest.

      --

      Joe Sixpacks, defender of the common man.

    14. Re:How about.. by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Remove that red tip and then you get visits from your friends in the local PD and ATF.

      You're going to get the visits anyway. The red tip will save you from getting shot when they visit.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    15. Re:How about.. by Wog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ones he's suggesting are, but my college friends and I got in for cheap by buying the spring-loaded ones. They're not semi-automatic, so you have to pull the slide before each shot. The upside is that they cost about $25 for a gun and clip, and usually under $10 for extra clips. Ammo is cheap when purchased in bulk and shared.

      Not to mention that they don't have nearly the potential for injury as gas and electric weapons at close range.

      The airsoft games in the forrest were absolutely fantastic. The problem came when a few of the students with scholarships started buying the gas pistols and electric rifles. Then one of them went on a rampage in the dorm parking lot, and the school cracked down. No more airsoft for us...

    16. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You walk out of your apartment with your guns visible?

      Depending on the concealed weapons laws in your state, it's probably illegal to have them not visible. (yeah, I know, hard to get arrested if they don't know you're doing it. I still don't like to break laws without a good reason.)

    17. Re:How about.. by whiplash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree, Airsoft is quite a bit of fun. Recently there was a game in California that had over 300 attendees. Many states have growing Airsoft communities that educate players how to have a good time playing the game, without getting thrown in jail for walking around in public with what looks like at best, pistols, and worse, machine guns. Plus, these communities allow members to post local Airsoft Events, there is even a website dedicated to advertising events regardless of location.

      As far as price goes, in the US, you can buy a fully-automatic, 1:1 replica (ex: AK47, M16, etc) for $250-$300, add in another $50 for a battery, and then $50 for a good pair of goggles and your major expenses are over. Ammo for Airsoft is typically $15 a bag for 3000-3700 BB's. Quite a bit cheaper than buying cases of paint, and you'll never have to pay for gas refills.
      Airsoft *might* be more expensive initially, but the only ongoing expenses are ammunition, which is very cheap compared ot paintball.

    18. Re:How about.. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      IIRC, manufacturers are required to include the colored tips because kids were getting shot for holding realistic-looking squirt guns.

      I remember a specific story where a young black kid was shot dead for holding a squirt gun that was modeled after a Beretta pistol.

    19. Re:How about.. by jalefkowit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The basic premise is that the guns are VERY realistic, shoot .25g pellets, and are extremely moddable. I have a Walther p-99, a Colt M-4, and a psg-1. People see me walking out from my apartment and they get afraid.

      Please tell me you're kidding. We live in a country where the police can blow you away for pulling out a wallet, and you think it's a good idea to tote around replica weapons that are indistinguishable from the real thing? That sounds like a baaaaaad idea to me...

    20. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Gun...Small Peepee

    21. Re:How about.. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Depending on the concealed weapons laws in your state, it's probably illegal to have them not visible.

      Depends. If he's transporting them in a proper case with the weapon unloaded and disassembled, he shouldn't be breaking any laws. Now if he was carrying a loaded shotgun in his backpack, or a handgun in an underarm holster, then he'd be in deep shit.

    22. Re:How about.. by armyofone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ok - I know I'm veering a bit off-topic but what's the point of including the word 'black'? Doesn't the phrase '...a young kid was shot dead...' carry the same weight?

      Not trolling - just genuinely wondering why people do this?

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    23. Re:How about.. by vbrtrmn · · Score: 1

      I used pellet guns w/ a friend, until he realized I knew how to aim. We both stood behind trees he had a six-shooter and I had a single shot. He fired all six pellets .. at .. um .. the tree, perhaps. I shot him in the elbow with the one pellet, while he was reloading. He didn't like the game after that.

      --
      it's a sig, wtf?
    24. Re:How about.. by cdrguru · · Score: 1
      Screw that - arrested? Hah. In Chicago if a cop sees you with a handgun (or something that looks like a handgun, like maybe a cell phone) you are running the risk of being shot.

      Brandishing a handgun (or worse, mutiple guns) immediately labels you as a drug dealer with a turf war in progress. There are enough people already running around with guns and intent to do others harm with them that we thank the police for providing such strong disincentives for displaying guns. Unfortunately, even the threat of immediate death does not deter some of these folks.

    25. Re:How about.. by vbrtrmn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I thought cops in the US were trained to shoot black people, holding anything.. including, but not limited to: an apple, a set of keys, a wallet, a comb, .. oh yeah a gun.

      --
      it's a sig, wtf?
    26. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a white kid probably wouldn't have gotten shot in the first place. I've only heard of inner-city minorities getting shot for holding squirt guns in a "threatening" manner. That simply doesn't happen in the burbs...

    27. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if the kid wasn't black the cop might not have been so quick to shoot him.

      This is somewhat of a stereotypical racist type reaction, but then again, statistically speaking minorities commit the most crimes.

      Sad but true.

    28. Re:How about.. by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      Paintball has the nice tendancies of having regulated fields and protective gear. its also highly 'moddable'.

      also, paintball guns hold about 200 rounds per standard hopper, go about 1000 shots per 20 oz of CO2, and you can 'tell' when someone is hit.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    29. Re:How about.. by some+damn+guy · · Score: 1

      While not as impressive as paintball accuracy

      Uhhh... not quite sure "impressive" is the best word to describe the accuracy of a paintball gun. Maybe I'm quibling but I think I would say "notably better than picking the ball up by hand and chucking it at someone" instead.

      Seriously, airsoft is a nice alternative to paintball provided you have seriously honest people to play with. No mess, no broken balls in your barrel, super cheap ammo, no blown O-rings and no leaky hoses. Of course, they might break as much as paintball guns do, but it didn't happen when I played (once). Most times, though, you have to shoot people multiple times at close range until they say "ow!" and can't pretend you didn't hit them anymore.

      And YES, the japanese ones are EXTREMELY realistic looking. In many places walking outside your apartment with one would probably get you shot by the police.

      While they are cool, I don't why people build up these big collections of them. I know a couple people who have like a half dozen. I'm not a huge gun nut, but I think just taking the money for the five extras and buying a real AR-15 would be much cooler.

    30. Re:How about.. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      It stuck out in memory, probably because it was emphasized by the news report I saw.

      Some might mention it with political intentions, but I try not to get caught in those flamewars.

    31. Re:How about.. by jon787 · · Score: 1
      Upgrading to the real thing?

      Paintball? ;)

      No, this is the real thing (or this for something a tad safer)
      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    32. Re:How about.. by trentblase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've always wondered why criminals don't just paint the tips of their real guns red. Well, of course sometimes the point is intimidation but it would give them a slightly better chance when confronted by law enforcement.

    33. Re:How about.. by pnot · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Chicago if a cop sees you with a handgun (or something that looks like a handgun, like maybe a cell phone) you are running the risk of being shot.

      Think that's bad? In the UK, a man was shot dead by police because he was taking a newly-repaired
      table leg home and someone mistook it for a shotgun. More details here.

    34. Re:How about.. by uberdave · · Score: 1

      I used to do that, although I was always a tad nervous about it, so I quit. One day, one of my friends caught a pellet in his cheek, just below the goggles, and wound up in the hospital. I felt sorry for him, but I was really glad I had quit. Paintball is a lot more fun.

    35. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from the fact that advertising you have handguns is probably a good way to get your house broken into and having them stolen

      Where I live (Kennesaw, GA), a city ordinance actually REQUIRES every homeowner to have, and know how to use, a gun.

      Very few houses get broken into...

    36. Re:How about.. by huckda · · Score: 1

      they have guns in the UK?

      When I was there the police had a whistle and a baton...and just blew and battered...

      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    37. Re:How about.. by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Huh. I live in a country where the police honk at the end of your driveway for permission to approach, then are very, very polite.

      Unless the BATFE is involved, of course.

      Nothing quite like living in extreme rural Tennessee or Kentucky.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    38. Re:How about.. by deke_kun · · Score: 1

      And thus I suggest that the best modification you could possibly do....FEEDBACK! Screw the crappy little vibration thing the sensor does when hit...make it deliver a stun-gun style jolt to the wearer...pain is good.

    39. Re:How about.. by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      What were the winter coats for, we never used anything other than the pellet guns.

    40. Re:How about.. by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that statistically speaking poor people commit the most crimes and it just so happens that most minorities are also poor.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    41. Re:How about.. by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
      How about..Big Gun...Small Peepee

      How about: Big Gun, Big Peepee, oops! Bang! Small Peepee.

    42. Re:How about.. by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      maybe not illegal per se, but if you brandish it at someone who is armed (cop or not), and they respond to the perceived deadly force with deadly force, they probably will get out of it at the trial (assuming, of course, that other than one gun being 'fake', it was justifiable, or a 'clean shoot')

      So yeah, airsoft is fun, and the guns are neat, but lets not do anything stupid that could prove dangerous, red tip or not.

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    43. Re:How about.. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You walk out of your apartment with your guns visible? Handguns with the red tips removed?

      You are correct, this is a stupid thing to do.

      Once I was at a small LAN party my friend was having and someone came in with a Glock 17 with the big ass 30 round magazine. He walked right up behind my friend and started talking in a threatening manner. I had a 9mm pistol in the small of my back and another of my friends had a .357 magnum revolver at his side. Thinking that something bad was about to happen, I asked my friend (who was being threatened) if everything was OK. He laughed and said that this guy was a friend of his and was just joking. They both started laughing and then he showed me that the Glock was unloaded. I breathed a sigh of relief and told the guy that "Something bad almost happened to you. You DO NOT play around like that." I then showed him my pistol and told him that there was still at least one other one in the room. He looked visably shaken. He didn't think that something as simple as a joke could cost him his life, and it nearly did. Guns (and anything that looks like them) are serious business. Do not play around when it comes to firearms. Period.

      brandishing a fake weapon can get you arrested or at the very least having a cop detain you at gun point.

      I was once stopped outside of an autoparts store, while I was working on my car, my shirt hiked up in the back. I needed to get something from the store, so I drove there and walked in. Bought what I needed and left. On my way out of the store, I realized that my shirt was up and my Makarov was showing. As I got to my car two police cars blazed into the lot and one of the cops opened his door and hid behind it. I knew what was going on so I put my arms out to the sides and opened my hands to show that I didn't have anything in them. The officer instructed me to come over to his car and place my hands on the hood. I did as he asked. I told him "It's in the small of my back". He took my pistol out of the holster and removed the magazine. He asked me if it was loaded, I said "Not anymore". He tried to check the chamber, but the safety was on so the slide wouldn't go back. I told him that he had to take the safety off. He did and then he made sure that the chamber was clear. I said "In my right front pocket is my wallet. In my wallet is my (concealed weapons) permit." He retrieved my walled and I showed him my permit. He in the serial number of my gun to make sure that it wasn't stolen. When everything came back clear he gave me my gun back and then he went into the store to explain to the people working there what had happened and that I wasn't a criminal. I went on my way, but it was about 20 minutes of my life that was wasted because I wasn't careful enough about keeping my gun concealed.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    44. Re:How about.. by Eskarel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      A number of states either have or are working on laws to ban the sale/ownership of hyper realistic toy guns. I'm not sure whether air soft guns with the red tip would be differentiated enough under these laws in the first place, but without I'm sure they'd be illegal.

      This sort of thing may sound like the government getting involved where it ought not to be and ruining peoples fun, but as I understand it the chief reason for these laws is that it can be difficult for a police officer to determine whether such a gun is real or fake at a glance. When cops see guns pointed at them, they don't usually take it lightly and people getting killed while wielding toy guns isn't terribly good for anyone.

    45. Re:How about.. by Frogbert · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which begs the question, what if you paint the tips of your real guns red? Then you can walk around brandishing them like toys and they will be none the wiser.

    46. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I left your mom blue and battered. She blew my baton, then I blew my whistle.

    47. Re:How about.. by pnot · · Score: 1

      they have guns in the UK?

      Regular police don't -- in this case, someone phoned in a tip-off ("man with non-English accent carrying long object in plastic bag!") so they sent an Armed Response Unit.

      When I was there the police had a whistle and a baton...and just blew and battered...

      It's usually known as a truncheon. Good word, truncheon.

    48. Re:How about.. by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1

      Interesting story. I have given a lot of thought as to what I would do if that happened to me. I, too, have a conceled weapons permit and sometimes carry a Berreta .22 semi-auto or an HK USP .40 in the small of my back. Same with the shirt hiking up to revel them a few times. Noone called the cops though and I am not even sure anyone saw.

      The main reason I have a concealed weapons permit is to eliminate (or at least greatly reduce) any chance of an illegal possession charge. Most gun crimes are felonies and that's the last thing anyone needs.

      By the way, do you carry one in the chamber?

    49. Re:How about.. by terrymr · · Score: 1

      Removing the red tip may well be illegal, check the laws of your state.

    50. Re:How about.. by armyofone · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... maybe in sheer quantity. But for the size of the crime, I think you'd have to look to the rich and powerful as the perps. Long before Enron, the precedent was set by The S&L Crisis - which was the single biggest theft of taxpayer dollars ever. Jim Wright, the Speaker of the House at the time, was forced to step down from his position as a result of that single crime. Daddy Bush's other kid, Neal was up to his eyeballs in that same deal as I recall. He got off scot-free.

      Gee - sure hope they're all still living comfortably while poor inner-city kids are being shot by police almost daily.
      </SARCASM>

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    51. Re:How about.. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The main reason I have a concealed weapons permit is to eliminate (or at least greatly reduce) any chance of an illegal possession charge. Most gun crimes are felonies and that's the last thing anyone needs.

      I got mine because when I was growing up a few of my friends were robbed at gunpoint. I didn't want to be in the same situation.

      By the way, do you carry one in the chamber?

      Never.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    52. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I believe the issue is violent crime. Generally cops don't have to worry about getting shot while arresting an Enron executive or the Speaker of the House.

    53. Re:How about.. by JohnsonWax · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, as much as I hate to say it, including the word 'black' makes it carry less weight. A lot of Americans simply assume that a large percentage of black kids will be shot dead eventually anyway. The statistics on this are pretty grim, but not as bad as large chunks of society believe.

    54. Re:How about.. by JohnsonWax · · Score: 2, Funny

      See, that's what's so great about America. Thousands of lives each year in the US are saved because we would assume that the table leg is an assault rifle, and everybody has one of those.

      Now, if you have a shotgun and the police think it's a table leg - then you're sure to be gunned down under the new WalMart Mandatory Consumption Laws. No repairing allowed on this side of the pond.

    55. Re:How about.. by imaginate · · Score: 1

      I got mine because when I was growing up a few of my friends were robbed at gunpoint. I didn't want to be in the same situation.

      You could still be in the same situation. With a gun, you'd just end up killing/maiming someone or, more likely, getting killed/maimed yourself; even if you have a gun they don't expect, you're still at a huge disadvantage if they already have one pointed at you.

      Personally, I'd rather lose my wallet than kill someone, but I guess that makes me a peace-loving hippy (I'm actually not, and I strongly uphold people's right to own guns).

    56. Re:How about.. by AgentPhunk · · Score: 1
      That sounds like a baaaaaad idea to me...

      Or a really good one if he's trying to get a Darwin Award

      Yay! Go stupid (soon to be dead) guy!

      PS - Something tells me this guy has a mullet, too.

    57. Re:How about.. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      It is not a bad idea, if you are legally allowed to carry those weapons. Gun laws vary state-by-state, and the strictest laws are placed on CONCEALED weapons. I live in Vermont, where you don't need a license to own most non-concealed and non-automatic firearms. It is perfectly legal for me to walk down the street with three shotguns and four rifles strapped to my body, holding a pistol in one hand and a knife in the other. As long as the guns are unloaded, the knife is sheathed, and I'm not doing it threateningly, there's no real problem. (Aside from nervous stares and a worried constable, if he's around.)

      While there have been some major police fuckups in this country and others, they generally involved people with potentially concealed weapons in high-stress and poorly lit situations. As long as I'm not threatening someone, non-concealed weapons are fine to tote around. Hell, I know some people who drive around with minimal visibility out their back window, due to all the guns stuffed in the gun rack. Again, as long as they aren't loaded, you don't get any problems from the police this far out in the country.

      I've even seen a guy walking down the road during duck season, wearing waders, with a bible in one hand and his shotgun cracked over his shoulder. He was going to church before going hunting, it seems. Apparently he used to stand his shotgun in the corner of the church during the sermon, and pick it up on the way out. If I were to point to a problem, it would have to be cities. Guns are fine way out here in the boonies...

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    58. Re:How about.. by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      brandishing a fake weapon can get you arrested or at the very least having a cop detain you at gun point.

      Hell, if you live the UK they will shoot you for brandishing a fake weapon. Also in Sunnyvale California they will shoot you for brandishing a fake weapon. I'm going to guess they will shoot you most places you brandish a fake weapon...maybe...

      But hey, isn't darwin great!

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    59. Re:How about.. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With a gun, you'd just end up killing/maiming someone or, more likely, getting killed/maimed yourself; even if you have a gun they don't expect,

      The statistice don't support your assertion. To resist a criminal with a gun makes you LESS LIKELY to be harmed than if you offered no resistance at all.

      My friends (that I mentioned earlier) still draw breath because some criminal decided not to kill them. I am not willing to bet my life that the criminal that I encounter is not a two strike felon who will kill me to keep me from identifying him.

      Personally, I'd rather lose my wallet than kill someone,

      Being that I never keep cash in my wallet, I could replace its contents with just a few hours of work. It's not my wallet that I'm prepared to defend, it's my life.

      I guess that makes me a peace-loving hippy (I'm actually not, and I strongly uphold people's right to own guns).

      To be honest, it wouldn't bother me in the least if you were a peace-loving hippy, as long as you don't try to force me to be one as well.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    60. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it with you americans, running around with guns for no reason? Even going to an autoparts store with a gun? It's sick and you know it.

    61. Re:How about.. by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      Yes, but people would feel threatened these days by the mere presense of such firepower, so you might be considered to be "brandishing" them anyway. Quite sad, really.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    62. Re:How about.. by tylernt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      even if you have a gun they don't expect, you're still at a huge disadvantage if they already have one pointed at you.

      This is certainly true. But carrying a gun is only a small part of concealed carry. The biggest part is situational awareness -- don't let THEM get the drop on YOU. You must be able to ACT, not REACT. When you are reacting, you are behind the power curve and carrying a gun is useless.

      If someone pointed a gun at me, I'm not going to draw mine. It would be suicide. But if I'm aware enough to see him starting to go for his before he can draw, THEN I have time to go for mine.

      I would also rather lose my wallet than kill someone. Problem is, even after he has my wallet, he might still shoot me. It happened to a gas station clerk not too long ago. The clerk was the perfect victim, complied with all requests, handed over the money, kept his hands in the air... then he got shot for no reason other than the bad guy felt like it.

      Always carry chambered! If you're trying to beat the bad guy to the draw, the extra half a second it takes to rack the slide WILL cost you your life.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    63. Re:How about.. by magefile · · Score: 1

      three shotguns and four rifles strapped to my body, holding a pistol in one hand and a knife in the other ... As long as ... I'm not doing it threateningly

      /me cowers in fear of the parents 3 shotguns, 4 rifles, pistol & knife

    64. Re:How about.. by tylernt · · Score: 1

      No auto parts store in the history of mankind has ever been robbed at gunpoint? Glad you could clue us in, thanks!

      If you're going to carry, it's annoying to have to decide "do I carry here?" "do I carry there?". It's also dangerous to leave it in the car (subject to theft) and there's always the risk of a negigent discharge if you're constantly taking it on and off. Easier and safer to just carry everywhere, even in low-risk areas. Do you take your conact lenses out when you take a midafternoon nap? Of course not. Too much hassle to fiddle with them, even if you don't need them while sleeping.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    65. Re:How about.. by tylernt · · Score: 1

      I think just taking the money for the five extras and buying a real AR-15 would be much cooler.

      You got that right! I do have a 1911 lookalike BB gun though. I can take in the garage for some sight picture and trigger control practice when shooting the real thing is impractical or inconvenient.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    66. Re:How about.. by mansa · · Score: 1

      What's going on there? Why would there be multiple guns (loaded?!?!) at a LAN party?

      You sound like a class-A psycho gun-nut.

    67. Re:How about.. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      What's going on there? Why would there be multiple guns (loaded?!?!) at a LAN party?

      We had to take an hour long car trip through a rural area to get there. I don't know about you, but I don't like having thousands of dollars worth of equipment with me and no way to protect it.

      You sound like a class-A psycho gun-nut.

      But you'd never have the nuts to say that to my face. You pinko pussy communist.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    68. Re:How about.. by ampathee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Reading this makes me feel extremely glad I live in New Zealand :)
      Not even the cops carry guns (usually)

    69. Re:How about.. by welsh+git · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Am I missing something here ?

      "Red coloured tips" on your non-guns to say "this isn't a real gun, honest officer?"

      What's stopping criminals with REAL guns putting a 'red tip' on the end of them ?

      --
      Sig out of date
    70. Re:How about.. by mansa · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      OK, so you're not just a gun-nut, you're also paranoid.

      By your comments it seems as if you take your pistol everywhere. I don't see the necessity in that... and just doing it because you can isn't a very good argument. Do you keep a loaded gun under your pillow as well? I don't think I'd want to live in a place where every unbalanced redneck-tinfoilhat-wearing imbecile is carrying a weapon. There's nothing wrong with owning them, but if everyone was carrying it would be a scary place. Check into what the vast majority of police organizations think of concealed weapons... are they "pinko pussy communist(s)"? too?

      Oh, and if I thought you didn't have 5 guns crammed down your crotch (to simulate a normal-sized penis) and one up your ass, I probably would tell you that.

      Fuck-off.

    71. Re:How about.. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Nah. Do it like the Army. Use lasers for target resolution, but have the weapon fire blanks to get the real muzzle flash, explosive sound, and kickback.

      I should add that if you run out of blanks or the gun james, the Laser won't fire. Now that's realism.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    72. Re:How about.. by Ipingforpong · · Score: 1

      I used to have an Eagle .68 (http://pbreview.com/products/reviews/164/) paintball pistol that I originally bought because I thought hey cool it looks like it's a real gun, well the first chance I had to use it was at a paintball match we had at one of my friends farms/ranches. When we were all ready to start one of the dads(who is a cop)that was in the match noticed my pistol and pulled me to side and told me if he knew it wasn't a paintball gun and I was in a public place I probably would have been shot on site by the police. Sold the gun the next and never bought another pb pistol.

    73. Re:How about.. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      By your comments it seems as if you take your pistol everywhere.

      Not to work, not into a bar and never when leaving the state. At any other time I just might be. The point is that criminals never know who is carrying and when.

      I don't see the necessity in that.

      You don't have to. Rights needn't be "necessary" in your eyes.

      Do you keep a loaded gun under your pillow as well?

      Break into my house if you want to find out.

      I don't think I'd want to live in a place where every unbalanced redneck-tinfoilhat-wearing imbecile is carrying a weapon.

      It's not possible for me to be a redneck. And mentally unbalanced people are already prohibited from owning firearms.

      There's nothing wrong with owning them, but if everyone was carrying it would be a scary place.

      The statistics don't support your assertion. In places where it is legal for law abiding Americans to carry guns, the crime rate is universally LOWER than in places with similar demographics that prohibit concealed carry.

      heck into what the vast majority of police organizations think of concealed weapons.

      Nice try. You have no chance of winning this argument. What do police think? Loor for yourself.

      The LEAA
      and the FOP both support concealed carry of firearms for law abiding citizens.

      are they "pinko pussy communist(s)"? too?

      Anyone who opposes law abiding citizens possessing the means to defend themselves agains violent criminals is.

      Oh, and if I thought you didn't have 5 guns crammed down your crotch (to simulate a normal-sized penis)

      Ok, you're right I don't have an average sized penis, with the statistic that 6" is average, I have an above average sized penis.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    74. Re:How about.. by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      Check into what the vast majority of police organizations think of concealed weapons...

      It really doesn't matter what police depts collectively think (nevermind that the "vast majority" of cops do not in fact oppose concealed-carry), the fact of the matter is that concealed-carry rights have decreased crime in virtually every case in the U.S.

      If somebody feels the need to be able to defend themselves -- however paranoid that may seem to you -- it is not your place to tell him/her he cannot do so anymore than you have the right to take away his or her right to smoke weed or have gay sex or practice some religion, because until he has the gun pointed at you or he has not taken standard gun-safety precautions (like safetying the firearm when not in use), he is of no threat to you.

      I suggest you go live in gunless Japan and let your children get slashed to death by some deranged psycho with a knife while the teachers stand unarmed and helpless to do anything.

    75. Re:How about.. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      That's probably the thing I miss most when comparing paintball to airsoft... Paintball doesn't have anything CLOSE to realistic looking weapondry. I'd kill for a paintball version of a P90. ...Probably something to do with the toys/realistic looks parental movement or some other BS.

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    76. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      i fully agree mate. watching these americans and their crazy ass gun fetish is mind blowing. I think its obvious why that country is completely out of control, esp with a madman at the helm.

      I watched bowling for columbine when it aired on TV1, and it all makes sence now.

      crazy assed mofo's if u ask me.

    77. Re:How about.. by cosmol · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Im glad I'm not the only one that thinks carrying loaded firearms to a LAN party is not-cool.

      Kano mentions that he was carrying to protect his computer equipment while en-route to the LAN. Can we assume that he was walking then? I mean, how is someone going to steal the equipment from a moving car?

      So he gets there and multiple people are carrying weapons, and even brandishing them at each other? I can just picture it now, a bunch of young angry teenagers trying to be cool by carrying weapons. Sad really.....

    78. Re:How about.. by ZeroTrace · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just one question...
      Why did you bring a 9mm to a LAN party? Do you play with somebody that cheats?

    79. Re:How about.. by Nadesico_God · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I live in missouri which has just recently passed a concealed carry law, but this incident happened about 2 years ago. I had been out hunting and as per usual in addition to my rifle i was also carrying a handgun (because you never know...). It got to be about 1pm and I decided to go back to town for lunch. On my way through town i decided it might be a good idea to stop and check on something at the sheriff's building. (See where this is heading?) I hoped out of my car and went into the building. I walked up to the reception window only to be met with the window being slammed shut and 3 deputies running out of various doors in the lobby. It was then that i realized where i had made a critical mistake. I had forgotten to remove the holster from my thigh and beyound that i had forgotten to remove the contents of said holster. It was all cleared up with in a few short minutes, but does bring up an interesting point. It is not illegal to carry a weapon in any state (IANAL, check before you try if you do, i do not garuntee this information to be true) as long as the weapon is not concealed and you have the right to own the weapon. This may not be correct but i know it is here because all they did was escort me out of the building after things were explained and allowed me to secure the weapon in my vehicle. As far as airsoft weapons go if they can not be easily distinguished from a real firearm and they are used for a crime they will be treated as a real firearm in court. The above is what i believe to be true, I am not a lawyer, in case of mistakes, refer to the sig.

    80. Re:How about.. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Well, that's two questions.

      Why did you bring a 9mm to a LAN party?

      Because I can, it's legal if you have a permit. Because you never know when someone may brandish a weapon in an attempt to rob you.

      Do you play with somebody that cheats?

      At first I was tempted to say "Just your wife.", but I decided against it.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    81. Re:How about.. by MrScience · · Score: 1

      Wait... so you need a permit to carry a concealed weapon... but you can be arrested for carrying a weapon in the open?

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

    82. Re:How about.. by k31bang · · Score: 1

      It can hurt a tad depending on how much protection you wear.

      --
      -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
    83. Re:How about.. by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      The trick is to put a red tip on a real gun -- That way they don't see you coming, they assume you've got a toy or airsoft or something.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    84. Re:How about.. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Wait... so you need a permit to carry a concealed weapon.

      In my state, yes.

      but you can be arrested for carrying a weapon in the open?

      In my state, arrested? Yes. Convicted? No. Police can do things like detaining or arresting you just to aggrevate you into not doing something.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    85. Re:How about.. by elp · · Score: 1

      A group of us were in the school shooting team (back during apartheid South Africa, all army sponsored).

      We had a really feeble/bored teacher who didn't keep a careful eye on us or on the ammo in the armoury so we used to steal boxes and boxes of .22 ammo. We made a set of zip guns, really crude things.

      Take the .22 rip the head off with a set of pliers, pour out the powder and fill the shell up with wax. Now you have a round that is only powered by the primer.

      Really fun to play war games with, except that they would leave HUGE bruises where ever they hit.

      Its only now that I am older that I realize how completly stupid we were. Stolen ammo, illegal firearms. If we had been caught I think we would have probably gone to jail for a year or two.

    86. Re:How about.. by dave420 · · Score: 1
      "I'm own 5 handguns"

      hehehehe

    87. Re:How about.. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Always carry chambered! If you're trying to beat the bad guy to the draw, the extra half a second it takes to rack the slide WILL cost you your life.

      Remember that situational awareness you spoke of? If I think I'll need it, I'll chanber a round. I have only felt the need to chamber a round once, I was out on a hike and I heard a big dog barking nearby. Fortunately it found something else to hold its interest and never came near me.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    88. Re:How about.. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You had guns at a lan party? What sort of whacko nutjob scared-ass freak are you?? what the hell?!? Am I the only one who finds it grossly disgusting that someone would bring deadly weapons to a lan party?? fuck! America is screwed if you have to be armed to go to the store or a party. "land of the free" my ass.

    89. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I suggest you go live in gunless Japan and let your children get slashed to death by some deranged psycho with a knife while the teachers stand unarmed and helpless to do anything. [wsws.org]

      And they didn't pull out some crazy martial arts technique to break the attacker's arms and send him flying into through the nearest window? Tsk tsk... I thought all Asians studied martial arts. My American view of humanity is shattered...

      That said, believing all Asians study martial arts is about as reasonable as the Japanese view that all Americans run around brandishing guns... Er...
    90. Re:How about.. by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Why?? when has a gun properly safed and unloaded sitting in the corner shot and killed someone??

      OR a gun being carried on a gun-rack jumped off and shot someone??

      OR a broken shotgun locked its own breach and shot someone.

      Guns are only scary to people who haven't been properly trained and exposed to them.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    91. Re:How about.. by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      The point is not grabbing a gun to go to a lan party. The point is that if you are the type of person willing to take responsibility for your own protection and the protection of those around you, you carry (almost) everywhere. If you do decide to carry it is important (and the responsible thing to do) to keep your weapon concealed. First this improves your situation immensely if you ever are in a position to actually need a weapon, because the bad guy isn't expecting it. Keeping the weapon properly concealed also keeps from (to use an old convention term) "freaking the mundanes." One of the biggest problems that someone who has just gotten thier permit, or someone who only carries infrequently, faces is the fact that they are not natural with carrying a weapon, and frequently give themselves away because of it. For those who carry day-in and day-out, you never forget you are carrying, but you gain a comfort level that keeps you from standing out.

      Now, as to why carry a weapon to a lan party... Home invasions are not frequent, however, certainly not unheard of. In my town just a couple years ago, four guys burst into a families home, killed 5 people in thier living room, stole $200 and the TV set, and got away clean. Imagine if you live next to one of the bad guys and they see 3-4 pasty geeks carry large amounts of high-end gamer gear into your house every Saturday morning. Nice tasty target with high resale value I would think.

      In all the years I've carried, I've only been in one situation where I ever felt the need to even draw my gun, and that was while I was on duty as an armed security guard. However, three times, I've stopped at gas stations or convenience stored within 5 hours of thier having been robbed, and on one of those occasions the clerk was killed. Could someone carrying a concealed weapon have preveted it, maybe, maybe not, but not having someone there to protect the clerk obviously wasn't the answer.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    92. Re:How about.. by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Who says your responsible for everyone's safety? Do you check with everyone around you that they're OK with you having the ability to kill them at a distance any time you want? No. That's my whole issue. People "take it upon themselves to be responsible citizens", yet don't ask those around them if they're OK with it. After all, who vouched for their gun-totin' skills, or the fact they're not the sort of person who shouldn't have a gun in the first place?

      You say you've only ever needed to use your gun once, when you were a security guard. Doesn't that tell you something? YOU DON'T NEED IT. There aren't rapists behind every bush, or assassins at every bus-stop or toll-booth. People aren't actively trying to kill you or anyone around you. Chances are, if someone wants to kill you, you've done something to make them feel that way.

      You're scared of home invasions? One happened in your town TWO YEARS AGO. You have less chance of being in a home invasion (or any armed episode) than being hit by a car, yet you don't want to tackle that killer (even though it presents a much more real threat to your life, and those you love). We live in a society, which means we are responsible to everyone else. Who's to judge us worthy of carrying a gun? Someone carrying in public affects everyone, yet everyone doesn't get a say. It's not exactly fair, or safe.

    93. Re:How about.. by scoot241 · · Score: 1

      I bought an Airsoft gun recently and it had a warning inside that it is illegal to remove the bright orange (on mine) tip. A friend of mine bought one without an orange tip, but he bought his a while back. Apparently this is a recent law.

    94. Re:How about.. by rho · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yah. Man, I'd love to be in a country whose government feared the people so much they took away their firearms.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    95. Re:How about.. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      For some real fun, some people are coloring their real firearms neon colors...

      I've seen a flourescent pink hangun before... I think it was 9mm.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    96. Re:How about.. by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      You were modded as funny, but I read it as truly insightful.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    97. Re:How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't carry , but I know people who do. The people who carry with a license are not the people you have to worry about. The people I've met who do carry are the sort of people who I *would* trust with my saftey.

      "Do you check with everyone around you that they're OK with you having the ability to kill them at a distance any time you want?"

      Do I have to check with everyone around me to see if they're OK with me having the ability to kill them up close any time I want? No? Why not? I could probably beat the crap out of you with my cane, does that mean I'm going to do it? Not unless I think you mean to do the same to me.

    98. Re:How about.. by lizrd · · Score: 1

      It's far less effective to use a fake looking real gun in a holdup than it is it use a real looking fake gun for the same.

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
    99. Re:How about.. by tylernt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just let me ask you this. Did Bill Hazen need a gun?

      http://www.healylaw.com/self-def.htm#1990

      Bill Hazen was in his cabin near Bakersfield, Calif., shortly after midnight when an intruder forced a sliding glass door. The Los Angeles minister was armed and ordered the man outside. During an ensuing scuffle the attacker ran, but an accomplice appeared in a pickup truck and tried to run down Hazen. The minister fired at the advancing truck and when the vehicle stopped, its occupant got out and said, "I counted six shots; you're out and now I'm going to get you." Hazen fired his large-capacity semi-automatic once more, dropping his adversary. Both men were taken into custody by sheriff's deputies.

      You have the authority to say that Mr. Hazen should be dead, then? You might also read some of the other stories, and you can judge whether those people who defended themselves NEED a gun or not.

      Anyway, why should you care if law-abiding citizens around you have guns? The only time you're going to see it is when it's defending a life. They are not any more of a threat to you than anybody else.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    100. Re:How about.. by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      I think CNN reported that Jet Li showed up, jabbed the guy in the throat, kicked him in the balls, broke his neck, and then did a Big Impressive Jump-Spinning Side-Kick Of Doom to knock the guy out of a second-story window onto a series of sharp spikes on a fence below, impaling the attacker through the right-side of his skull, through his chest, and through his ass.

      Children were momentarily horrified, one proclaiming "it's just like DBZ!", then promptly returned to working insanely-hard math problems. ;-)

    101. Re:How about.. by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      "Guns are only scary to people who haven't been properly trained and exposed to them."
      Don't ask me why, but I'd say most Americans would fall under that category.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    102. Re:How about.. by welsh+git · · Score: 1

      errrr exactly. so make your real gun look fake with a 'red tip', and gain those extra few moments of surprise....

      --
      Sig out of date
    103. Re:How about.. by lizrd · · Score: 1
      An unorthodox tactic for a surprise assassination. Probably better to just keep the real gun in your pocket so they don't know you have it at all, but criminals are stupid.

      It does make the gun far less useful for intimidation. It's pretty hard to rob a convenience store or a bank with a gun that everyone believes is fake. Proving otherwise involves actually shooting.

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
    104. Re:How about.. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      He he. A near entrant for the Darwin awards!

    105. Re:How about.. by welsh+git · · Score: 1

      Ahhh I see where you're coming from now. Yeah good point.
      I guess I was thinking more along the lines of someone who is specifically out to shoot/assinate someone, but I guess I watch too much TV :)

      --
      Sig out of date
    106. Re:How about.. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Kano mentions that he was carrying to protect his computer equipment while en-route to the LAN. Can we assume that he was walking then?

      No, it was a 45 minute or so drive though a rural area to get there. We didn't have a parking garage to enter, we had to carry our equipment across the street.

      I mean, how is someone going to steal the equipment from a moving car?

      Can you tell me where to buy tires that can never go flat? Or where to buy a car that never malfunctions?

      So he gets there and multiple people are carrying weapons, and even brandishing them at each other? I can just picture it now, a bunch of young angry teenagers trying to be cool by carrying weapons.

      At the time I was about 22, and the youngest one there. Since I was carrying legally, I would need to be at least 21. But, I can't assume that you know anything about the law related to firearms, or you would have already known that. Since before I was born, the law has mandated that you be 21 years of age to legally purchase a handgun. This was established by the Gun Control Act of 1968. After a few high profile assassinations, congress moved to place some restrictions of who can purchase a firearm and through what channels.

      It's kind of odd how people who have an aversion to firearms also seem to have an aversion to any and all knowledge related to the field.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    107. Re:How about.. by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      While a disproportionate number of the poor are minorities, it is not true that most minorities are poor, nor is it even true that most of the poor are minorities (a little over half are white). However, at some point in the future it is likely that most of the poor will be minorities, but only because whites are steadily declining in number, as a result of a lower birthrate and of non-whites as the primary source of new immigrants. Within most of our lifetimes, whites will no longer make up the majority of the US population. They will still be the largest single skin color, but will no longer be an absolute majority.

  5. What other sorts of inexpensive things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Exploding blood packs. And lots of them.

    1. Re:What other sorts of inexpensive things? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 5, Funny



      "New, from Ronco... it's Sam Peckinpah brand Laser Tag! Impress your friends! Scare your neighbors! Attract the attention of the Department of Homeland Security! For best results, play on fresh snow."

    2. Re:What other sorts of inexpensive things? by holysin · · Score: 1

      Can you even buy exploding blood packets in the US, or are they afraid people would scare each other?

  6. I know! by Tebriel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apply modules that translate sounds into amplified waves of destruction!

    Now, to find a word or phrase which has power....

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    1. Re:I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Muad D'ib! Aghhhhhhhhhh.

    2. Re:I know! by shannara256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ni!

    3. Re:I know! by MrFluffyPants26 · · Score: 0

      Muadib!

    4. Re:I know! by NarrMaster · · Score: 0

      "laahhhhhhhhhhh, ZUU!"

      --
      That's right. All your base.
    5. Re:I know! by ry0n · · Score: 1

      Paul: "My name... is a killing word." The Tom Servo in my head: "Yeah, but so is Shaat-zuh!"

    6. Re:I know! by sYn+pHrEAk · · Score: 1

      It!

    7. Re:I know! by wierdthing · · Score: 1

      Anyone watched Dune the movie Muaaaaaaa'Dib

  7. On a Spaceship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Put them all together and make a giant laser. Then proceed to blow up earth with your frickin laser.

    Muahahahahahahaha

  8. Airsoft by dicepackage · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you ever considered airsoft as an alternative? The guns are expensive but they should still be cheaper then getting realistic laser tag gear and a lot more fun. Airsoft uses air to launch small 6mm plastic BBs and they are designed to look like the real thing. Most guns that are sold in stores like Walmart are very cheaply made and not worth your money. I would recommend getting an AEG (Automatic Electric Gun) from Asia (airsoftshop.com, wgcshop.com) but if you prefer to buy from the US I would recommend combatdepot.com. Airsoft can be dangerous so if you play make sure you are wearing proper eye protection (at least ANSI 87.1). Also be sure to inform any neighbors you have as well as the police that you are having an airsoft game. You do not want the police comming to your house and opening fire on everyone they see.

    1. Re:Airsoft by consolidatedbord · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come now, we all know us nerds can't handle pain very well, let alone that of a plastic BB. It's already threatening enough with the possibility of a laser getting in your eyes. :)

      --
      while true ; do echo this is my sig; done
    2. Re:Airsoft by hraefn · · Score: 1

      My main complaint with AirSoft is the replica-styling of the weapons. No one should mistake a paintball gun or a lasertag "gun" for something lethal.

      That said, AirSoft is fun as heck, especially at close range (evil cackle)

    3. Re:Airsoft by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Ear protection's a good idea too. Those little BB's can really hurt, and I wouldn't want to get nailed in the ear canal.

      Crappy part is that covering your ears messes with hearing the enemy sneaking up on you.

    4. Re:Airsoft by bstanton0101 · · Score: 1

      6mm plastic BB? "You'll shoot your eye out."

      --
      Please excuse my English. I am American.
    5. Re:Airsoft by dicepackage · · Score: 1

      That is why you wear ANSI 87.1 rated goggles. They give you a full seal around your eyes and they can withstand a shot from point blank range even with a heavily upgraded gun.

    6. Re:Airsoft by riptide_dot · · Score: 1

      Also be sure to inform any neighbors you have as well as the police that you are having an airsoft game.

      Well said, but you obviously don't live in my neighborhood. The next time I step on one of these little BBs while barefoot on my driveway I'm gonna schedule a quick AirSoft with my neighborhood kids. The catch? I'll be using a paintball gun...:)

      --
      I was in the park the other day wondering why frisbees get bigger and bigger the closer they get - and then it hit me.
    7. Re:Airsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought an Airsoft gun last year from http://www.hardcoreairsoft.com and haven't regretted it once. It helps when you have a local group with forums that post where games are.

    8. Re:Airsoft by AugstWest · · Score: 5, Funny

      The one advatange that laser tag has over things like this is a scoring system.

      Of course, if you're a non-competitive type, this isn't an issue, but just thinking about this I can instantly remember being a kid and yelling "You missed me," despite having a little yellow bb lodged in my left eye.

    9. Re:Airsoft by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      Oh, and airsoft does hurt. About a month ago, me and a friend came around a corner on each other...

      His P-90 swung faster than my M-4...I still have a line of scars down my left side from his burst.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    10. Re:Airsoft by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      Paint ball

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    11. Re:Airsoft by drtomaso · · Score: 1

      You might check out paintball guns called "Real Action Markers"- theres only a few models, and one company making them, but basically its a clip-fed paintball gun that looks like an M4 carbine or glock 17. I dont own one- realistics like these are illegal in the NYC area, probably having something to do with how cops might respond to a 911 call reporting a warehouse full of kids armed with machine guns.

      The little welt left by a 6mm bb can be hidden, but its a bit harder to cover up the splat made by a .40 or .43 paintball.

    12. Re:Airsoft by BK425 · · Score: 1

      Score 5 informative?
      I thought he was -joking-: "be sure to inform any neighbors you have as well as the police that you are having an airsoft game."
      We -want- a shooting game involving tools that look like weapons of deadly force? What if the dispatcher forgets to tell the patrol in your area? This is a bad idea on so -many- levels...
      Airsoft is great, the good guns teach trigger control and follow through... but pointing them at other humans is just a bad idea.

    13. Re:Airsoft by elFarto+the+2nd · · Score: 1

      Goes to prove the P90 is better :)

      ...and yes, I have a P90 airsoft gun.

      Regards
      elFarto
    14. Re:Airsoft by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      I don't think anybody has mentioned this so far, but there are in fact 6mm airsoft paintballs available. A bit more expensive then the regular airsoft pellets, but way easier to tell when someone has been shot.

    15. Re:Airsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a kid and yelling "You missed me," despite having a little yellow bb lodged in my left eye

      With a bb lodged in your left eye, you probably did miss him.

    16. Re:Airsoft by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

      No, I go paintballing, and people are always wiping themselves down, despite me seeing the ball explode dead in their chest.

      Other than that you have the standard, "That was there from last round." and "I just leaned up against a wall that had paint on it."

      The trick to this is, play against people you know and you know they aren't cheaters.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    17. Re:Airsoft by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Plastic BBs? Wuss. In my day, we had brass and steel (that's metal, kids) BBs fired from airguns pumped 50+ times. Ever had to dig one of those fuckers out of yourself with a knife before your Mom saw it? Didn't think so.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  9. If you can get your hands on larger capacitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure there's a way to rig the equipment so you don't need to wear detectors.

  10. Obligatory by Michael+Crutcher · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe you should add frickin sharks to your lasers.

    1. Re:Obligatory by toyotaboy · · Score: 1

      funniest reply, ever!

    2. Re:Obligatory by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

      Sharks, of course.
      But are they ill tempered?

      --
      Design for Use, not Construction!
    3. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in Soviet Russia, my friend...

    4. Re:Obligatory by Evil+Al · · Score: 1

      Or dogs, or bees, or the dogs with bees in their
      mouths and when they bark they shoot bees at you!

      Alex

      --
      Ah, computer dating -- it's like pimping, but you rarely have to use the phrase "upside your head" -- Bender
  11. Making it more realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You want to fire at your friends and coworkers with real laser weapons?

    1. Re:Making it more realistic? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      You want to fire at your friends and coworkers with real laser weapons?

      Any laser should do. All you need to do is up the output to the Kilowatt or higher range. With a few kilowatts and the proper optics, you should have a handy little drill. Up it into the megawatt range and things will start combusting. Go for the GigaWatt range and you can watch things vaporize!

      BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

      Now there's that little problem with the charge time on Gigawatt lasers...

    2. Re:Making it more realistic? by FrzrBrn · · Score: 1
      A few kilowatts?!? MegaWatts?! GIGAWATTS!?!? I've worked with metal cutting laser that was (only) 10 Watts. Even that was more than enough to take a chunk out of a guy's finger when he wasn't being careful. Note this was an infrared beam on a design prototype and that the safety interlocks were disengaged which is why he was able to get his finger in the way when the laser was on. Yes, he knew better but just got careless.

      I'm sure you were joking about those power ranges, but anything above a few milliwatts requires warning labels and anything above about 100 mW (I think) requires safety mechanisms so that people don't hurt themselves. Of course, things like wavelength, whether the laser light is scattered or directed, etc. come into account.

      Go here to see how the government classifies lasers.

      --
      I read it on the Internet, it must be true!
    3. Re:Making it more realistic? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      "A few kilowatts?!? MegaWatts?! GIGAWATTS!?!?"

      Yes, Gigawatts. I'm firing it to get even with Kent. It's a moral imperative.

      You know, I'm suddenly getting this craving for some popcorn...

      Prof. Jerry Hathaway: What do you want, Knight?
      Chris Knight: World peace . . . but I don't think this is the time to discuss it.


  12. Paintball by Inominate · · Score: 1

    Or airsoft.
    Forget laser tag, buy a couple of masks and a couple of markers. They can be had online for not too much money.

  13. Mod parent up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you.. great laugh.

  14. paintball. by thecombatwombat · · Score: 1

    I'm sure lots of people are going to say the same thing . . . but I stand by it.

    1. Re:paintball. by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      arent you annoyed at the insane number of mosquitoes (attracted by the CO2) at outdoor paintball fields?

    2. Re:paintball. by thecombatwombat · · Score: 1

      "arent you annoyed at the insane number of mosquitoes (attracted by the CO2) at outdoor paintball fields?"

      Well, no. Like I heard on a radio ad recently . . . "Hell yeah it hurts." Mosquitos just aren't the concern, and wear some OFF spray or something like that.

  15. Just outfit them with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    stun gun mods that shock the wearer when hit, now thats realism.

    1. Re:Just outfit them with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one's suggested limiting the number of "bullets". Then forcing the player to go to hand-to-hand combat.

    2. Re:Just outfit them with... by mrwonton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I prefer the concept from Ender's Game, with the suits that freeze up when hit.

      --
      Not more than you need, just more than you want
    3. Re:Just outfit them with... by Rber0 · · Score: 1

      Remember... mod down.

  16. the annoying "buzz" by Cruciform · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A bunch of college kids we knew were addicted to playing "Laser Quest, and tried encouraging us (paintball fans) to play.

    What a joke.

    There's no real incentive not to get shot, besides the lack of points. With paintball you know when you've been hit, because it hurts like hell. Laser Quest's hits resulted in your vest buzzing and your gun not working for a few seconds.

    Plus there was no running or ducking in the arena.

    Suggestions of wiring eletrodes to the vest to zap players were met with blank stares and hostility. I still think that's the way to go... modify them from "laser tag" to "pain gun tag" :)

    1. Re:the annoying "buzz" by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      Suggestions of wiring eletrodes to the vest to zap players were met with blank stares and hostility. I still think that's the way to go... modify them from "laser tag" to "pain gun tag" :)

      Don't you mean Taser Tag?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:the annoying "buzz" by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      No, because there's no taser wires involved.

    3. Re:the annoying "buzz" by wwest4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is it only serious if there is pain involved? Why do people constantly need to establish some "hard core" pecking order to everything?

      > There's no real incentive not to get shot, besides the lack of points.

      Maybe there's no incentive to play paintball without someone getting their organs shredded by hot, flesh-piercing projectiles. Roar! Seriously, the "get a life, play paintball" argument is laughable coming from grown men who wear ghilli suits and shoot each other in a make-believe battlefield.

      I love bikes. I especially like riding single track, freeride, and trials. I'd be an idiot if I called road cycling a joke because there is generally less blood involved. Not everyone needs to experience pain to feel alive, just us masochists :)

    4. Re:the annoying "buzz" by cmowire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      See, I think there's a split in the combat-games folks.

      On one side you've got the SCA, paintball folks, etc, where you have pain.

      On the other side, you've got padded-weapon combat, laser tag, etc. to avoid pain.

      It seems like most folks fit into one or the other, but rarely both. Padded weaponry folks need to really whack SCA folks when they compete because otherwise the SCA person won't acknowlage that they've been hit.

      In any case, I don't know if electrodes in the vest is an especially good idea. The problem is that your skin conductivity changes as it gets wet, increasing the risk that you'd accidentally give somebody too much amperage across the heart. And it gets awfully bulky.

      I think you really need to just accept that laser tag does not involve pain and leave it at that. The real problem is the programming and rules of the particular game you were playing. Even if it's just inconvenient (have to work your way back through the field to the "hospital" if you are killed or some variant) to die, people will be more scared.

    5. Re:the annoying "buzz" by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Suggestions of wiring eletrodes to the vest to zap players were met with blank stares and hostility. I still think that's the way to go... modify them from "laser tag" to "pain gun tag" :)

      A more serious idea might be to attach Piezo buzzers at various points of the player's suit. When the player gets "hit", his suit will rattle his bones a little bit and make him not *want* to get hit.

      Hmm... maybe I should suggest this to the local Lazer Storm...

    6. Re:the annoying "buzz" by Scorpio1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      As someone who worked at Laser Quest for 3 years and has been a member there for 6 years, I feel the need to defend LQ. Did you guys play anything other than the standard Solo missions? That's what they play with the general public except at Lock-ins (all night events). Anyway, Solo missions are admittedly boring because it's just all about who can get the most points. There are some more challenging team games such as Chess which have complex team structures with different positions who have different numbers of lives/shots. When there's a team goal and it's not unlimited lives, things get interesting.

    7. Re:the annoying "buzz" by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      In any case, I don't know if electrodes in the vest is an especially good idea. The problem is that your skin conductivity changes as it gets wet, increasing the risk that you'd accidentally give somebody too much amperage across the heart. And it gets awfully bulky.

      Piezo buzzers. That's the answer. Spread them throughout the suit. They will make the player uncomfortable when he gets hit, AND give him a general idea of where he was hit.

    8. Re:the annoying "buzz" by p4ul13 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I agree with the gist of what you're saying in that many of the replys to the thread have been along the lines of "play a real game of paintball instead".

      Though the question was 'how can I make laser tag more realistic'. The answer of paintball is almost a legitamate solution, but doesn't answer the actual question posed. On the other hand, there's probably not much that can be done to increase the laser tag realism factor.

      On the other other hand, your post made me want to get my bicycle out of the shed and onto a muddy trail.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    9. Re:the annoying "buzz" by apraetor · · Score: 1

      Yea, they ought to play with tazers.

    10. Re:the annoying "buzz" by pogle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the last big game of lasertag I was in required you to go back to the base station and reactivate your gun. Sucked, cuz if your team got routed, the enemy could sometimes surround the base and snipe you off as soon as you reactivated. But this was a professional arena place, and their EQ stopped working until reactivated at the base be design. So I guess you could work towards having the guns become inactive until hit by a special beam from the base station or something...

      But yeah, penalties besides pain can actually be greater encouragement to do well. Ok, paintballs can hurt or something, but if I get the enemy anyways, big deal. If I get shot and have to go respawn before I can do anything else, its much more encouragement to not get shot.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    11. Re:the annoying "buzz" by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess I have to work on my punchline delivery then. :)

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    12. Re:the annoying "buzz" by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Just use the element from an electric dog training collar. Unless your heart is directly between the two electrodes, it should not be dangerous.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    13. Re:the annoying "buzz" by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      There's no need to have more amperage if the resistance decreases. It's called "current control" and it's a well established function of Electrical Engineering.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    14. Re:the annoying "buzz" by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's hard to get the adrenaline rush of a fight/flight response when your body is expecting a mild vibration.

      Get nailed by a paintball in the neck in the first round, and the rest of the matches you play in you'll practically be vibrating on your own from the adrenalin you produce while your body lets you know it doesn't want that to happen again.

      The "joke" of it was the whole experience, not just the lack of pain. Can you imagine being dropped into a lager tag arena and being told you can't even walk at a fast pace, or duck to avoid shots? People would also cover the sensor with their hand to avoid hits, similar to the "wipe-off" that some paintballers do to avoid getting booted for being tagged. At least the paint ball leaves a residue the observant can use to catch cheaters.

      And biking isn't a combat sport... at least not yet :)

    15. Re:the annoying "buzz" by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I like that idea.

      Adding a heavy duty rumble pack to the weapon and giving it hit points might liven it up a bit too.

      The more damage the weapon takes the worse the rumble gets, making it harder to aim, until the weapon finally gives out.

      Still, there needs to be a way to prevent sensor blocking.

    16. Re:the annoying "buzz" by climberkid · · Score: 1

      What about small explosive devices that, when the player is hit, explode sending him sailing to the ground...might be an effective deterrent to "suicidal" laser tag participants. Only downside is the requirement of reloading explosives after each round...and the whole serious injury thing...whatever

    17. Re:the annoying "buzz" by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      We played there in 95 or 96, and it was just some solo and team "deathmatch".

      Chess sounds like it might be interesting, but the mechanics of the vests and guns, as well as the strolling pace, were big turn-offs.

      Has anything been added to the weapons or vests to determine if the sensors are being obstructed?

    18. Re:the annoying "buzz" by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The arena is small and dimly lit, so there's no point in allowing running or ducking, otherwise there's the risk of tripping.

      Paintball requires a dedicated park of a pretty big size, meaning you have to drive out to nowhere to get to one.

    19. Re:the annoying "buzz" by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      There's no real incentive not to get shot, besides the lack of points. With paintball you know when you've been hit, because it hurts like hell.


      We all have our own thresholds for pain - your milage may vary. However, I disagree. Paintball doesn't hurt near as much.

      That's not to say it doesn't hurt. But then, you will most likely be running around in some outdoors environment complete with all the bugs, critters, dirt, thorns, heat, cold, and other obstacles and assailants of the outdoors. You're in for some sort of physical abuse one way or another. Occasionally, it'll involve a particularly unfortunate and nasty impact by a paintball.

      There are plenty of times I've noted mystery dots on my skin after a day on the field. Sometimes they'll look like I had a particularly nasty time with an octopus - lines of red welts stitched across a body part. Obviously, I'd taken hits (or a number of hits) but forgotten. The thing is, unless the contact produced a broken paintball and resulting mark, I would quickly forget the impact. I felt the hit(s). Looked down, checked for paint. Discovered none. And moved on, quickly forgetting the encounter (eager to induce a simular encounter with my opponent on a more favorable term).

      This is not a hit that "hurts like hell."

      So the advantage to a paintball? Physics. You don't worry about hotspots on your target (although some areas produce better breaks than others). Obstacles such as leaves give way to a paintball where they block photons. There's something of a thrill when you hear the "thock" of a paintball connect to something nearby... or the "whir" of one speeding past you. And there's a certain sense of satisfaction when you've manage to arch a shot across a wide open space to produce a hit where the target assumed he'd be out of range and safe (a zen moment referred to as the "longball").
    20. Re:the annoying "buzz" by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      > It's hard to get the adrenaline rush of a fight/flight response when
      > your body is expecting a mild vibration.

      I understand that you value this facet of the sport as a core component of your personal enjoyment. I'm just pointing out that this is not the same for everyone.

      > And biking isn't a combat sport...

      It's a good comparison, nevertheless. A 5-foot drop can be harrowing and adrenaline inducing, and painful whether you stick it or not (depending on your rig and skill - it hurts for me every time!). The point is that the rush is not the only valid reason for doing a 5-foot drop. You might just want to weave it into your flow or you could just be testing your suspension or showing off in order to get laid.

      Anything else is the same. Combat sports can stimulate ones interest in tactics, stealth, electronics, reenactment, whatever - adrenaline is not strictly neccessary for enjoyment. I would think that even in paintball, a sense of detachment and calm would make for a better player. It certainly makes for a better trials/trick rider. Nervous folks overgrip, and stay too rigid. Cool heads ride with finess and don't sweat the tricky stuff.

    21. Re:the annoying "buzz" by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      So basically you and your friends care less about accurate scoring and need pain to motivate you.

      What a joke.

      I want to WIN.

      A little pain is not going to motivate me more. Only a a sadistic person that cares more about hurting his opponent then seeing which shooter got the most hits would prefer that silly child-ish game of paintball to a manly game where stats rule.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    22. Re:the annoying "buzz" by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Yes, a wipe offable paint is a better way to catch cheaters than a computer. that tracks them.

      You want to catch cheaters? Put a couple more sensors on.

      I am a smart, win motivated person, not some idiot that won't try my hardests unless I get punished.

      Yes there are advantages to both games, but stop denegrating the game being discussed and get back on topic.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    23. Re:the annoying "buzz" by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Adding a heavy duty rumble pack to the weapon and giving it hit points might liven it up a bit too.

      Maybe it should be added to the legs and arms instead of the gun? If you added enough sensors on the player, you could calculate instant-kill hits and wound-causing hits. If the player is wounded, you could start a rumble in his legs or arms. This would make it more difficult for him to move or aim, thus simulating real battle damage. This idea could then be extended to the idea of playing with battle armor (simulated by the computer, of course). "Battle Armor" would certainly give the campers (sorry, snipers) a bad day! :-)

    24. Re:the annoying "buzz" by cmowire · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know that.

      My point is, do you really want to find out what happens with a beaten-up power source, with droplets of water in it, etc? That's pretty far into the category of risks that don't have any particularly good reward at the end.

    25. Re:the annoying "buzz" by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      It seems like most folks fit into one or the other, but rarely both.

      I owned paintball gear for about a year. Played maybe on half a dozen different occasions. The best part? It's "real". Hurts when you get hit and you tend to act like you're in a real war. I enjoyed it, but I sold the gear for a few reasons:

      1. Expensive to play. I'd drop $20-$40 on supplies for half a day of play.

      2. Can't just play anywhere. We tried to play in a big, deserted canyon once. Someone in a house at the top of the hill threatened to call the cops. This was empty public property but we didn't want any trouble, so we left.

      3. The places you CAN play aren't usually very fun. Lots of dirt, tumbleweeds, stickers, etc, that I had to pick out of my clothes when I was done.

      4. Protective gear made for uncomfortable play. Especially on a 100 degree day.

      5. Some people are assholes. I had a guy light me up from maybe 20 feet away, even though I had my hands up and was asking him which team he was on (he'd JUST entered in the middle of a game). He just kept shooting, wouldn't stop. Hurt like HELL. I was ready for a fist fight with that f***er. Anyone who has ever played paintball can share a similar story.

      Laser tag appeals to me. You can play anywhere (nice, grassy public parks, etc), no need for protective gear, it's cheap, and it's fun. I can easily buy enough gear for half a dozen friends for what I paid for my paintball equipment, and it's easy to talk them into a quick one hour game.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    26. Re:the annoying "buzz" by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      there's probably not much that can be done to increase the laser tag realism factor.

      what's the problem? how hard is it to make lasers that hurt? If they burn a big hole in the skin, that will be pretty realistic. If this doesn't work, why not use flamethrowers instead?

    27. Re:the annoying "buzz" by igw · · Score: 1

      Maybe you cold get one of those electric shock ab workout belt things, wire it so when you get shot you get a few seconds blast, which at full power would be quite a shock and would slow you down: cheap, quick to do and is an incentive to not get shot.... unless you want firmer abs or your money back!

    28. Re:the annoying "buzz" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereas I, on the other hand, am inspired to get my road bike out and go somewhere fast, because road cycling rocks, and mountain biking is a joke :-)

    29. Re:the annoying "buzz" by wskellenger · · Score: 1
      "...adrenaline is not strictly neccessary for enjoyment."

      But it certainly helps. After paragliding (tandem) in NZ last summer, I found my hands shaking and I could barely stand when we hit the ground again. The pilot just laughed and with his kiwi accent said, "That's just adrenaline, mate! That's the best drug there is."

      It seems that you base your enjoyment on how much you use your skills, think, or even test your equipment... I'm guessing that's highly atypical. Most runners will tell you that they get a "runner's high" in addition to getting a great workout. And most experienced mountain bikers will take the steeper, faster downhill route because they over-stimulate their senses, casuing an adrenaline rush. The steeper route is just... more fun.

      Paintballs zinging over your head (especially from strangers!) while you're ducked down trying to avoid the painful splat add a dimension to the game that LaserTag players just won't experience. This dimension (the adrenaline rush) is what keeps most people coming back.

    30. Re:the annoying "buzz" by KanSer · · Score: 1

      People please, laser tag places are generally run by minimum-wage white males. If they're really adamant and strict about running pay the idiot off, but I'm always moving quickly. Besides, laser tag arenas are more like a firefight in a building, and you dont see swat sprinting down hallways. It's a quick movement but nothing close to running.

      If the guy won't even allow you to hustle tell him to shove it and get a real job. Idiots exercizing pseudo-authority for not-enough money usually don't do anything after being told to go to hell.

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    31. Re:the annoying "buzz" by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      > But it certainly helps.

      I agree that occasionally it's fun, but for some people a true adrenaline rush is scary, uncomfortable, and not sought. I can think of several solid XC riders I know who will not ride anything more narrow than two feet, dismount anywhere near a precipice, and stay off stunts and drops because they value relaxation over white-knuckle adrenaline rushes. It's just not their thing.

      > Most runners will tell you that they get a "runner's high" in addition to
      > getting a great workout. And most experienced mountain bikers will take the
      > steeper, faster downhill route because they over-stimulate their senses,
      > casuing an adrenaline rush. The steeper route is just... more fun.

      Runner's high is caused by endorphins, not adrenaline (I run distance too, so I'm quite familiar with the sensation). It's much more serene... in technical biking terms, it's what I referred to earlier as "flow." Knowing many very insanely good riders, I think your view of them as adrenaline junkies is a misconception. True extreme bikers (cliff jumpers, etc.) are in a tiny minority. Expert bikers, DH or XC, are rarely going to get an adrenaline rush on anything but the most extreme stuff. These guys can do what they do because they have technical skills and finesse - and adrenaline is the enemy of finesse. Threading a highly technical downhill while jacked up on adrenaline will probably produce a fall. I'd say beginner bikers get more adrenaline rushes on average, because they are more often pushing to try new stuff and practice skills. That's not to say that the majority of bikers don't experience adrenaline jolts occasionally, but you can't pull that shit every ride without breaking a collarbone, because it's riding at the envelope of your ability by definition.

      One pursuit is not superior to the other, they are just different - which was my original point. To each his own, and there are ups and downs to both. It depends on what you want. I like to win and/or do my best. I've played paintball a couple of times. My aim and decision making during the games sucked much worse than in the practice rounds because of the adrenaline. I like winning more than I like the rush, so if I were able to develop a detached state of mind and perform better, I think I'd come more often, and I don't think that's atypical at all. A lot of people aim to win or at least compete, and we often stick to what we are good at pursuant to that.

    32. Re:the annoying "buzz" by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      3. The places you CAN play aren't usually very fun. Lots of dirt, tumbleweeds, stickers, etc, that I had to pick out of my clothes when I was done.
      IIRC, there are places that have purchased enough land where it is possible to perform paintball with permission from the owner - usually known as paintball arenas. Of course, you probably know this along with the fact that they aren't always available in some areas.

      5. Some people are assholes. I had a guy light me up from maybe 20 feet away, even though I had my hands up and was asking him which team he was on (he'd JUST entered in the middle of a game). He just kept shooting, wouldn't stop. Hurt like HELL. I was ready for a fist fight with that f***er. Anyone who has ever played paintball can share a similar story.
      In case those idiots appear later, future players migh want to check out the 3-crack rule, where players that fire hit a target more than three times are thrown out of the game. Firing paintballs that rapidly is considered a safety hazard, and is a very good way of getting permanently banned from most arenas.
    33. Re:the annoying "buzz" by wskellenger · · Score: 1
      Runner's high is caused by endorphins, not adrenaline (I run distance too, so I'm quite familiar with the sensation). It's much more serene...

      Oops. :) Is it also endorphins that are released when you feel pain? (i.e., don't spicy food lovers enjoy the endorphine rush?)

      The rest of your comment was very well-spoken -- I think you're right that when you're riding on a competitive level, you probably are much more focused. I think you initially came off a bit dismissive/cynical with this:

      > Maybe there's no incentive to play paintball without someone getting their
      > organs shredded by hot, flesh-piercing projectiles. Roar!

      The poster's intial point was that Laser Tag was just not as much fun as paintball, since when you're being shot at, there's no feedback to the players except a "beep" when you're out. You can't even adjust your aim with the "weapon", as you can't see your own "shots". For an outdoor battle game, there's too much simulation involved with the whole deal. It's too sterile.

    34. Re:the annoying "buzz" by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      Laser Quest is dumb because of the lame "no running or ducking" rules, the tiny arenas, and the underpowered lasers/bad sensors. But that doesn't mean all laser tag has to be dumb. Imagine laser tag outside, sans the retarded black-light/sci-fi motif, with higher-powered lasers that could actually trigger the sensors from decent distances, with more and more sensitive sensors, and most importantly a _really loud_ speaker on your vest that would go off almost loud enough to hurt your ears, continuously until you return to your base after being shot. Once that happened to you in the middle of a game you wouldn't be in a hurry to get shot again, even though it wouldn't hurt you physically.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    35. Re:the annoying "buzz" by billn · · Score: 1

      I play laser tag (LQ) in a fairly hardcore fashion *because* I'm an endorphin junkie. A solid LQ game against skilled players is as much exertion (though less impact) than a 15 minute fencing bout for with the objective being most hits. Watching a pair of LQ players duel/dogfight is like watching martial arts sparring. There's an entire tournament scene devoted to it.

      If you don't think you can get a rush from laser tag, you're clearly underestimating it.

      --
      - billn
    36. Re:the annoying "buzz" by CtlAtlDelete · · Score: 0

      It's not about establishing a hierarchy or a pecking order. It's because getting hit with a paintball actually hurts. That changes the whole texture of the game and maybe even makes it more real.

      I guarantee that anyone (caveat - a normal person with an average pain response), will feel pain when hit with a paintball at medium to close range. A direct hit usually leaves a large nasty bruise unless you are padded. I have seen many broken fingers. You are also usually playing outside in a much larger area with more opportunity for concealment. I have seen some nuts bury themselves in leaves in areas where snakes are common just to get the drop on an opponent.

      Accordingly, you will also (same caveats as before) make much more of an effort to avoid being shot when playing paintball than when playing laser tag. Let's say that paintball really incentivizes you more than laser tag does. I have played both and speak from experience.

    37. Re:the annoying "buzz" by Tzarius · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine being dropped into a lager tag arena and being told you can't even walk at a fast pace, or duck to avoid shots?

      If I was dropped into a Lager Tag arena, I don't think I'd be concerned about running and ducking...

    38. Re:the annoying "buzz" by texas · · Score: 1

      I have played paintball for years and years, at the rec level in the woods, and at 3, 5, and 10 man pro-am speedball tournaments. I have yet to see anyone break a finger, or any bone, for that matter. In fact, the worst that I've seen happen was when a teammate forgot his cup one day, and so, of course, he got tagged right on one of his testicles. Ended his day right quick. And I once got clotheslined by a tree branch while retreating. Been playing for 12 years now, and that's about the worst of it, aside from the regular bruises and briar-scratches.

      And if the broken fingers came from getting hit, maybe your local group should invest in a chronograph, or quit playing with frozen paint.

      --
      Hey, how'd you know I was lookin' at you if you weren't lookin' at me?
    39. Re:the annoying "buzz" by billn · · Score: 1

      AVP and Highlander. =D

      --
      - billn
    40. Re:the annoying "buzz" by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      > you initially came off a bit dismissive/cynical

      Probably true, I apologize. It's admittedly pent-up frustration. Up until recently, I worked with a guy who disparaged laser tag constantly in favor of paintball, and I came to see it as an form of self-aggrandizing elitism that has no real basis. You can always somehow up the ante in a particular activity if you need to, but I don't see that as an absolute indicator of mettle or character. A cool-as-ice paintball player might be nervous at his own divorce proceeding, for example, while a divorce lawyer may not. "Interdisciplinary" grace under pressure is a rare gift, and it's probably not easy to develop with specificity.

      I think in the real reason he trumpeted so loudly is because he wanted recognition for skillfully enduring his particular choice of challenge; maybe to take the focus of some other insecurities, who knows. I can appreciate his accomplishment, I just deride the idea that any particular challenge is instrinsically more difficult or noteworthy on its own. There are other factors to consider, like experience, personal limitations and circumstance.

      > You can't even adjust your aim with the "weapon", as you can't see your own
      > "shots"

      Back on topic, your thoughts have made me think of other mods I forgot to mention A roughly-calibrated laser pointer makes the mall-mart guns more fun. (e.g. one sniper per team). A green pointer in sync with the trigger would make for "tracer" beams, though they are more expensive. "force fields" or "nukes" are also a possibility (continuously flood a plane or volume with the appropriate IR signal) but I've never tried anything like that.

  17. ouch by flatcat · · Score: 1

    Add in a stun gun for more realism. No more guessing if you hit someone, the twitching will tell all.

  18. Before we get to the firepower by Sexy+Commando · · Score: 1
    Why not add some self-cleaning device?

    I still got this icky feeling from the game last time. Touching last user's half-dried sweat is NOT a pleasant experience.

  19. Realistic in reference to . . . by aarku · · Score: 1

    US combat missions involving laser tag fights? But the public hasn't found out about those yet. . . I mean. uh.

    1. Re:Realistic in reference to . . . by Octorian · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh, you mean those guys over at Ft. Irwin, CA, running around with MILES gear on their M16's, M1A1's, and vests....

    2. Re:Realistic in reference to . . . by ViolentGreen · · Score: 0

      Actually, from what I understand, ther is some Military training with laser tag.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    3. Re:Realistic in reference to . . . by karniv0re · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm in the National Guard and I've played with the MILES gear before. I hate it. Mostly because mine never works right... Then again, they might be doing that to me on purpose... Come to think of it, they do make me wear that big red bullseye and walk in front of the group everywhere we go... Hey!

    4. Re:Realistic in reference to . . . by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      I was going to say, he should just join the Army and go to Fort Irwin...largest instrumented battlefield simulation in the world...the closest you can get to real combat without being there. Full selection of OPFOR (opposing forces) for the ultimate in realism - these guys are the home team and know every waddi, berm and hilltop in the place; blazing heat through which you must hump 130 pounds of gear, the sounds and smoke of battle, the pain of blisters and sore muscles from walking all over and digging into its pitted surface, and the humiliation of defeat as you learn how little you really know about tactics and execution of military operations in a full stress environment. Yours only for the cost of admission - 4 to 6 years of your life (with the callup of the inactive ready reserve components probably more like 6).

      Of course, the 'down side' (or up side - depending on your point of view) of that plan is the deployment to Iraq that would follow. :)

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    5. Re:Realistic in reference to . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mine never works right...

      Or maybe you're just not a good shot?

    6. Re:Realistic in reference to . . . by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Of course there are really 3 combat training centers... NTC (Ft. Irwin, CA), JRTC (Ft. Polk, LA), and CMTC (Hohenfels, Germany). But yeah, NTC is the biggest one and the one in the desert.

  20. small width laser beam not more real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Decrease the beam width? Most laser beams (and I would say all on inexpensive laser tag equipment) are very small width - .8mm less. And if you are thinkg about realism the beam should be more like real ammo... 2.2 mm at a MINIMUM. Making the barrels smaller would be a simple task - and I would think that you would only want that to make the gun look more real. To make it really real, you need full body suit of targets, the guns to make a louder sound when they shoot, and a computer system to manage it all to calculate delays on distance... or you could try paintball?

    1. Re:small width laser beam not more real... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      The beam spreads considerably at a distance. This was disconcerting as a child, as it meant that one had to be in close to avoid getting hit sometimes. The Lazer Tag pistols were more like shotguns in that way.

      Better beam attenuation would also have the effect of increasing the effective range, making sniping more possible.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:small width laser beam not more real... by irving47 · · Score: 1

      Hey, that gives me an idea. I haven't played much, but how sensitive are the vests? I could put a little magnifying lens in front of the laser and use that to spread the beam WAY out. or some other method of diffusion...

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    3. Re:small width laser beam not more real... by ry0n · · Score: 1

      Consumer Laser Tag (Laser Challenge) doesn't use lasers. It's just RF.

    4. Re:small width laser beam not more real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it doesn't. It uses IR lasers.

  21. Bah... by Fizzl · · Score: 1

    Forget the damn laser gheytag.
    Just play paintpall. It's much more fun.

    1. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry but paintball is massively less acurate.

      until you can get me paintball sniper rifles stop offering up your lame sport.

      paintball... funny... accuracy of the ball at 50 feet is horrid.

    2. Re:Bah... by Crinos · · Score: 1

      huh... sounds like you've never played with anyone who's decent.

      I'm not that good at the sport, I run a Spyder Xtra with a Dye Boomstick, and I can hit someone at 50' no problem. Hell, even 100' isn't that bad. My friend has a Tippman A-5 with a flatline barrel, he can hit people at 150' no issue.

      Sounds like you either need to practice more, or stop buying your markers at Wal-Mart.

      --
      The Sacred Chao says, "MU".
    3. Re:Bah... by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      My friend has a Tippman A-5 with a flatline barrel, he can hit people at 150' no issue.

      Damn campers.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    4. Re:Bah... by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      So.. You have actually played (sp?) either of the sports? The infrared "laser" beam gets disorted very quickly.
      Yeah. If you consider "shooting someone with a firehose" sharpshooting, be my guest. (Well, firehose in an environment with no gravity.)

      I wouldn't consider trying to hit the silly little receiver very interesting either. Very easy to cheat by just covering the damn thing.
      Also, you can observe the exactly same behaviour with bullets as with the paint balls. Just in larger scale. If you really are doing some sharp shooting you must inherently calculate the effect of wind, gravity, small twigs and so on on the fly while trying to hit your enemy. (Yes, I have done some research. Especially after reading a life story of one man certain man.)

      PS. Shit I hate to over explain every damn post I make while being even slightly drunk.

    5. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grrrrr... And still left a typo after proofreading 5 times. And in the link too.

  22. Obvious! by spidergoat2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your laser gun needs a laser targeting system.

    1. Re:Obvious! by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Modded funny, but this is something I never got about sci fi. Why are they sighting lasre shots with radar/imaging/whatever? This is inherently inaccurate and very inefficient. If you want a laser that can never miss its target, use a dual intensity laser. Paint your target with a weak laser point, then when you pull the trigger, you dump all the charge from your capacitors into one really hot beam. Since you're using the same lenses and equipment for sighting as you use for firing, what you see is what you kill. A sort of red-hot-death version of an SLR Camera.

      But then again, that would take all the fun out of being able to "dodge" lasers.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:Obvious! by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      Actually they come with this. Lazer tag games really use a lazer pointer just to show you where you are aiming at. The actual hit/miss is done by radiowaves.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  23. Targets? by Alexis+Brooke · · Score: 1

    How about just a shirt with a target on the front and back to make it easier for the cops to accidentally shoot you. It'll definitely add to the realism of your experience.

    --
    This is a special excite .sig
    This
  24. Another mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides increasing the power to extend the gun's range, maybe a sniper scope?

    Aw hell, just attach an airsoft grenade launcher. :-D

  25. Great Mod by swordboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Cut old laser gun exactly in half (longitudinally)
    2) Discard both halves
    3) Replace with this.

    Nobody'll be the wiser!

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Great Mod by flatcat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I love the sale price, $1.05 less then retail, .003% discount. What a bargain.

    2. Re:Great Mod by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      I dunno how they do things back home by you, but around here, adding a % to a number automatically reduces the value by a factor of 100. So when you say $1 = 0.003% of a number, I can only assume that the gun in question costs over $33,000. For that kind of money, I'd expect a gun with AI target tracking and 50 rounds per second auto-cannon-fire mode. So it was a great disappointment when I actually RTFL.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  26. Nothing is more interesting than TAZERS! by Orclover · · Score: 5, Funny

    Grab a cheap stungun/cattleprod from the next gunshow, rig it to the relay that activates when the light sensor is tagged. Attach leeds from the stungun to the wearee's body.

    Viola, now whenever you get tagged not only are you embarrassed but your jiggling and peeing yourself as well. Fun for the whole family.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. -Fight Club
    1. Re:Nothing is more interesting than TAZERS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For heaven's sake, don't attach Leeds!


      Manchester or Newcastle, all right, but never Leeds.

    2. Re:Nothing is more interesting than TAZERS! by gabba_gabba_hey · · Score: 1

      You win :) thanks for the laugh. Seriously though, I think that would make laser tag vastly more fun.

  27. Remote Bomb Detonators by wwest4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The "Laser Challenge" sets have a bomb that is ordinarily set off with a toggle switch - one direction for slow fuse, another for long fuse. It's a fairly simple hack to rip out the switch and substitute with an SCR and an IR photoresistor to allow remote detonation of the short fuse option. Then you can set minefields and set them off from a safe distance - Laser Geneva Conventions be damned!

    1. Re:Remote Bomb Detonators by jon787 · · Score: 1

      A landmine, like a claymore, that is manually detonated by an operator is not banned by the anti-landmine treaty.

      Granted you can rig a claymore to explode by a tripwrire or some similar method that is activated by an unsuspecting enemey (or more commonly civilian)

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    2. Re:Remote Bomb Detonators by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Why not a LASCR responsive to IR?

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:Remote Bomb Detonators by magefile · · Score: 1

      Because there's no such thing as a LASCR. And because making the LASER aim by IR (motion detector?) would make it much more expensive, not to mention making it no longer a bomb/mine.

  28. I've been working on a home... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...CO2 laser tag kit, but my brother seems as yet unwilling to test it out. Might just have to force the issue.

  29. More real effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about rigging it up to a stun gun so when you get "hit" you really go down.

  30. Electrodes by freaksta · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How about electrodes that give you a slight (or not so slight) shock when you get shot. Try using Nural Stimulators, used for testing if muscle relaxers are still working on patients in surgery.

    --


    Hrrm... I usually just sign my name.
  31. Infared Lasers?!?! by purduephotog · · Score: 0

    What are you trying to do- burn holes in people? That's making it a bit TOO realistic, IMHO.

    What you want to do is use RED lasers for targetting, but you need the beam to be larger than the 1cm it'll spread over any distance. So you need to either fire it into a spinning prism such that it 'scans' a space over an acceptable range, or you need to optically enlarge the beam and recollaminate it.

    More fun, I would think, would be to use GREEN lasers. They're visible to the eye, but you would absolutely REQUIRE eye protection for both you and any participants. A green laser to the eye would be temporarily blinding; some red lasers too but green is 'peaked' for pain.

    Now you could also use a bunch of stacked LED arrays to make a more realistic beam punch or larger batteries... or...

    1. Re:Infared Lasers?!?! by Zen+Punk · · Score: 0

      Yes, Infrared lasers. All the laser tag sets I've ever seen or owned used either a red beam or an invisible infrared beam very close to the visible spectrum. That is why you can set off the sensors with remote controls. Oh by the way, did you know that modern remote controls project an infrared beam? You don't see those burning any holes in people do you?

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    2. Re:Infared Lasers?!?! by purduephotog · · Score: 1

      Thats NOT a laser. That's an LED. ALL IR Lasers are CO2 burning/Cutting. That was the humorous point of my post- it's an IR Light Emitting Diode 'tag' set, not an IR Laser Tag set.

      Like I said, were it the latter you'd know you were hit when a welt appeared on your skin, followed up immediately by your scream of agony as the laser burned thru your flesh. Assuming you could see after the reflected IR radiation blinded you.

  32. Laser Tag - Now 137% More Realistic! by NickABusey · · Score: 1

    "find plans online for augmenting our laser tag gear to make it more realistic." More realistic. Yes, so you can feel like you really ARE nerds running around in the woods shooting at each other with laser pointers.

    --

    - Nick Busey
    www.pedalbmx.com
    www.nickbusey.com
    1. Re:Laser Tag - Now 137% More Realistic! by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      and is paintball any more realistic? How accurate are those guns 50+ feet? Laser tag is to Paintball, what Paintball is to Airsoft.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:Laser Tag - Now 137% More Realistic! by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Laser tag is to Paintball, what Paintball is to Airsoft.

      IFF you live in a state where Airsoft is legal.

  33. I always wanted to use some MILES gear by Emot · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As the subline says, I've always wanted to go out in the field with some MILES gear and blank-adapted rifles. It's much more fun when you're stalking around corners with an AR-15 and going BAMBAMBAMBAMBAM at an opponent until his little siren starts to beep. Unfortunately, real MILES gear is GODDAMNED EXPENSIVE and we've been looking for a cheaper alternative which fulfils the same roles (such as, shots fired, which shot from which player hits you, who you've hit, hit percentages, GPS position and bearing tracking, et cetera). If any of you out here in slash-land have any tips, I'd be much obliged.

    --

    ALL HAIL THE BEAST THAT ASCENDETH FROM THE PIT WITH HIS CUTE WIDDLE NOSE =^o.o^=

    1. Re:I always wanted to use some MILES gear by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I am wrong, but "shots fired, which shot from which player hits you, who you've hit, hit percentages, GPS position and bearing tracking, et cetera" sounds FREAKING expensive. In fact, I would be surprised if the MILES gear has all of that.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  34. MILES or SIMUNITIONS by sinnfeiner1916 · · Score: 1

    The laser tag stuff that the army mods their weapons with would definatly increase realism. Of course, the guns themselves are expensive enough (at least $750 for a decent AR-15 type rifle, and not from Armalite at that...) and I have no idea where to get the MILES stuff. Some people have suggested paintball or airsoft. I would suggest simunitions. they are paintball-like cartridges fired from real weapons. the police use them to train, particularly for SWAT teams and stuff. http://www.simunition.com is the source.

    --
    The More Laws, the less Justice --Marcus Tullius Cicero
    1. Re:MILES or SIMUNITIONS by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      I've thought of this too. If you already have real weapons, modding them to use MILES gear should not be terribly difficult, as I believe it operates by sound. It would be about as realistic as you could get. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that you can buy it anywhere.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    2. Re:MILES or SIMUNITIONS by sinnfeiner1916 · · Score: 1

      I don't see why not. It doesn't hurt anyone. I think it should be freely available. Of course, I see the 2nd amendment as a duty, not a right -- everyone should have to muster for their town's civil defense militia -- especially these days. I am against a standing army on constitutional purposes as well, so that is why I think people should have to drill and train and bear arms in ready defence of their property, family, and State.

      --
      The More Laws, the less Justice --Marcus Tullius Cicero
    3. Re:MILES or SIMUNITIONS by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1

      I looked at that Simunitions site. I think that qualifies as a bad idea. (Not so bad, since they'd never sell it to you.)

      Aside from the fact that I wouldn't want to be shooting at my friends with a real gun, "oops, I grabbed the wrong clip." did you see the protective equipment you need to buy?

      The guys in the pictures look like they are bundled up as much as that poor kid in "A Christmas Story." Plus they have neck-shields. A game that requires neck-shields is just scary to me.

      It doesn't sound like your consumer/amatuer friendly system to me.

      --
      --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    4. Re:MILES or SIMUNITIONS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      The military's MILES would probably be the ultimate in realism since it uses real weapons (personal weapons from the M-16 family all the way up to the barrels of M1A2 tanks!) firing blanks. And the lasers and receivers are all networked so that a hit on a soldier's vest (whether from an M-16 or a Bradley's 25-mm gun) disables his personal weapon but not vice-versa (a soldier can't knock out a Brad or an M1 with his trusty M4.)

      As such, you can imagine that the system is NOT available for civilian use. But apparently someone's trying to create their own MILES setup -- and it's open sourced!!!!

      MilesTag Open Source Project

      Failing that, simunitions as suggested previously would be another good option -- that is if you can afford the ammunition. And if you feel like shelling out an additional few thousand dollars to equip yourself and all your buddies with REAL handguns/rifles to shoot the ammo.

      Naturally, this might not even BE an option since your local government might have "problems" with a group of yahoos running around the woods (or any other area) with REAL weapons. ([sarcasm on] After all, the Second Amendment only applies to SOME people who live in the "right" places or know the right people. [sarcasm off])

      As for paintball... Yeah it's "fun" but HARDLY anymore "realistic." As a gun owner and avid shooter of "real-steel" guns, I've played paintball and it isn't a totally satisfying experience. Paintball ballistics aren't anywhere close to true bullets. (Hitting something at 20- or even 10 yards requires mortar-like aiming techniques in my humble experience.)

      Airsoft guns look closer to the real deal (which again may get you in trouble with the local law enforcement types) and supposedly the 6-mm pellets (as opposed to the .68-cal, or roughly 17-mm, paintballs) have a flatter, more realistic trajectory.

      But I have no experience with them, so I really couldn't say either way.

      Perhaps the ultimate would be to outfit airsoft guns with laser emmitters and players with harness that shock you when hit by a laser?

    5. Re:MILES or SIMUNITIONS by sinnfeiner1916 · · Score: 1

      there is a conversion kit, so you can either shoot the simunitions or the steel-jacketed rounds, not both. Then there is all this blue shit on the gun, say, the 1911s, you have to replace the whole upper and the slide, same with the AR-15/M16/M4 rifles, et cetera. The shotguns conversions look like choker tubes. The gun is modded, so it can't fire live ammo. However, you don't look like a dork with a bottle sticking a foot out from some strange-looking concoction of tubes like with paintball. It's like a cross between airsoft and paintball, only better. i don't get why i can't buy this stuff... or the pepper spray rounds... that'd be mighty good for home defense... if someone breaks into my house, they will be shot. however, i have no wish to actually kill someone. rubber bullets or pepper spray (you can get off 3 or 4 rounds to the chest before the realize, and then it wafts up and subdues them, according to the history channle) would be grand for that, although has nothing to do with your game.

      --
      The More Laws, the less Justice --Marcus Tullius Cicero
    6. Re:MILES or SIMUNITIONS by propellerhead_prime · · Score: 1

      Actually MILES is attached to the barrel of a weapon and is activated by the pressure wave created near the flash suppressor when a round is fired. There is a small black disk on the front of the laser that is sensitive to this pressure and can be set off by gently tapping on it with your finger...this is just one of the major failings of MILES gear for military use, since it allows soldiers who have expended all their ammunition to continue shooting without any limit, or it allows them to shoot with an absolutely silent 'sniper' weapon that has no signature whether visual or audible.

      Avoid MILES. It sucks in a special kind of way. Trust me on this.

  35. Most realistic laser tag found to date BY FAR... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...involved tossing CD burners at each other.

  36. Does that mean TV is out too? by Mz6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seriously, It's tough to find TV shows that aren't increasingly showing more violence, nudity, etc... Although, Bush is cracking down.

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:Does that mean TV is out too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cracking down on nudity, yes. Cracking down on violence, ha. Bush's re-election campaign is BASED on fear.

    2. Re:Does that mean TV is out too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real push for tougher enforcement has come from Democratic commissioner Michael Copps, who was outraged by Mr. Stern's kidding about hookers and rescue workers at ground zero. Mr. Copps also wanted to yank a station's license because it aired a vulgar shock jock called Bubba the Love Sponge.

      Chairman Powell himself believes that Mr. Stern's desire for "unbounded on-air expression is a fair argument"

      WSJ

  37. Wide range laser-tag by darth_MALL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's a mod i just thought of. Go about your daily business. Provide each player with a locator and a gun. Rig the locators to let you know when an opponent (also with a locator) is within a certain range (ie. 50 yds.). Begin panicked drawing of gun and be the first to find and kill the opponent. You must carry the gear at all times, and you must play regardless of your location, say in a classroom or at a wedding. This might be sweet as a campus-wide game. Even better if you don't know who the opponents are!

    1. Re:Wide range laser-tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could be easily done with Micrel's lineup of unlicensed UHF transmitter and receiver chips.

    2. Re:Wide range laser-tag by LordBodak · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a more advanced version of Killer.

      --
      LordBodak's journal.
    3. Re:Wide range laser-tag by kabocox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Start a company that uses a cell phone to do this. You could have a radar map with the "nearest" targets. Of course, it would freak some folks out to have people sneaking around with their cell phones pointed like guns.

    4. Re:Wide range laser-tag by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

      And when you get a successful kill, walk up to your recently dispatched opponent and say "Gotcha"

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    5. Re:Wide range laser-tag by afish40 · · Score: 1

      Off-topic, I always thought it would be cool to use cell phones for a wide-scale game of tag / hide-and-seek. You'd be playing all the time, and you wouldn't know who your opponents were. If the "it" and another player come within a certain range (presumably via Bluetooth phones automatically seeking each other), the phone would alert both players, and the hunt would be on.

      Unfortunately, constantly searching for local Bluetooth devices would be a huge drain on your phone battery, but I can still dream.

      --
      Thanks a million. Push Start to replay.
    6. Re:Wide range laser-tag by ksa122 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We actually played a similar game to this when I was a freshman in college. We all had to buy waterguns, and were all given the name of another person who was playing. We had to figure out who the person was and shoot them when they were not in a "safe zone" (ie the dorms or the dining commons). Once you eliminated someone, you would get their piece of paper and their target would become your target. This would go on til there was only 1 person left.

    7. Re:Wide range laser-tag by CXI · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like a good recipe for getting yourself shot by a police officer. Don't laugh, it almost happened to a friend of mine on Halloween when he pulled his laser tag gun, at night, on what he thought was another party-goer.

    8. Re:Wide range laser-tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a rip-off of the movie "Gotcha!" with the guy from ER (anthony edwards)... basically everyone got a contract and hunted each other until only 1 left...

      that movie is GREAT by the way.. true classic

    9. Re:Wide range laser-tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a great idea! Nothing will get you chicks like carrying laser tag gear at all times!

    10. Re:Wide range laser-tag by starcraftsicko · · Score: 1
      Of course, it would freak some folks out to have people sneaking around with their cell phones pointed like guns.

      More likely they'll think they are in ET.

      The "new" ET that is by the new, no-vison Spielberg.
    11. Re:Wide range laser-tag by EngMedic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you want a better campus wide game, try Assassin, the classic "hunt your target with a squirt gun" game. rules vary, but the ones that prove very fun are these:

      a. get a bunch of people to play, preferably 30+

      b. assign a judge, and everyone else draws a name from a hat. The person drawn is your target

      c. you can only make kills when there are no witnesses : this means when either you and your target are alone, or when you're in a large crowd and nobody's looking. Once squirted/tagged/shotz0red with a paintball gun/whatever, the dead man gives the live one his target, and the field winnows. There are no "safe" zones.

      d. everyone chips in $5 to play.

      At a SUNY school (state univ... ny), there were several games going at once -- apparently, the professors/grad students got into the action and would call students into their office to "discuss something" ....
      no, it doesn't physically hurt if you're using squirt guns, but the psychological pain of mind-bending paranoia (especially when you don't know how many people are playing) and the mental wrench at not winning the $5*n (where n= people playing) more than make up for it -- and it lasts a lot longer. With a properly chosen number of players (200 or more ?) games can run the entire semester.

      --
      filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
    12. Re:Wide range laser-tag by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      I've always wanted to arrange something similar, a neighbourhood or city-wide challenge like that. But, the Laser Tag equipment up here is downright ugly, klunky, uncomfortable and gross. Not to mention extremely over-priced. Whatever happened to the cool vests and helmets from the original Laser Tag (you know, the one that was based on the cartoon or vice versa)??

      If they make a nice-looking LT outfit and handgun, that could be comfortably worn at all times, with a battery life to last all day, and didn't cost an arm-and-a-leg, then this might be a fun "welcome to college" activity. :)

    13. Re:Wide range laser-tag by codegen · · Score: 3, Interesting
      When I was an undergrad back in the early 80's we had a different version of assassin. The rules are similar with one major difference, The assassince are not limited to squirt guns. The assasin could use different weapons provided the umpire approved of it in advance. A buddy of mine was on the escalator in the student center when a group of ballons was dropped on him from above. Taped to the balloons was a card that said "10 ton safe". Crushed ACME style!!

      Another aquaintance was pegged by one of the females in the group that came up and kissed him. Then said, "poison lipstik"!

      It could get crazy, but the umpires did a good job of keeping things at least comic book real.

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
    14. Re:Wide range laser-tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's a mod i just thought of. Go about your daily business. Provide each player with a locator and a gun. Rig the locators to let you know when an opponent (also with a locator) is within a certain range (ie. 50 yds.). Begin panicked drawing of gun and be the first to find and kill the opponent. You must carry the gear at all times, and you must play regardless of your location, say in a classroom or at a wedding. This might be sweet as a campus-wide game. Even better if you don't know who the opponents are!

      Except on hallow ground.

    15. Re:Wide range laser-tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody really did get shot dead at a Halloween party in Laurel Canyon, Los Angeles by the LAPD while waving a fake gun. His heirs lost their lawsuit, too.

    16. Re:Wide range laser-tag by jcsehak · · Score: 1

      What's to keep you from assasinating someone who's playing the game but isn't your target? Assuming you know more than one person in the game, of course.

      --

      c-hack.com |
    17. Re:Wide range laser-tag by astro-g · · Score: 1

      we have a club called KAOS on campus here
      Kaos stands for Killing As an Organsied Sport.
      the organise huge killing rounds which are similar to what you describe.

    18. Re:Wide range laser-tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What rules govern what a target can do against a would be assasin?

    19. Re:Wide range laser-tag by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      Yes! We ran that as a forty person game in high school. My girlfreind ended up being my assasin, but hey, I had some fun before she killed me.
      =)

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
  38. No Need by travdaddy · · Score: 5, Funny

    My peers and I have tried to find plans online for augmenting our laser tag gear to make it more realistic.

    Don't waste time augmenting to make it realistic, just use real guns! Besides, the Stormtroopers showed us that real laser guns are awfully hard to aim.

    --
    Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    1. Re:No Need by SecretSquirrel42 · · Score: 1

      Use a signal strength indicator instead... Then randomise a near miss/wound/kill based on that

    2. Re:No Need by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Storm troopers did not use lasers, they used blasters. According to Lucas tradition, a blaster fires a beam of highly charged particles -- not just photons -- gleamed from an excited gas focused by a crystal. Due to their excited state, these particles release photons as they travel, which is why you can see the blast in air and why it moves significantly slower than the speed of light. The innaccuracies in firing a blaster are generally due to the quality of the focusing crystal; a Stormtrooper's blaster carbine uses a larger but less pure crystal prone to cracks and imperfections which increase during extended use.

      This is one of the reasons why I like Lucas' original fantasy, by the way: the Imperial stormtroopers used cutrate gear right and left because they were considered expendable. That seems very realistic to me.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:No Need by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Military Axiom number 12: always remember that your equipment was built by the lowest bidder.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:No Need by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Not true in the Bush whitehouse. Now, everything is built without bids, contracts granted for political favors.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    5. Re:No Need by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Good point. Fine; the Bush Modification: "Or, the money for your equipment is actually being spent on barrels and barrels of PORK."

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  39. add on for laser tag...... by theJerk242 · · Score: 0

    What other sorts of inexpensive things could be added to our gear to make it more interesting?

    Nothing! Just pistol whip each other. That ought to make an interesting/fun game of laser tag. ;)

    --
    Red Bull gave me wings and I flew into the ceiling fan.
  40. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by numakris · · Score: 1, Insightful

    HAHA Protect the kids. I hate overprotective psycho parents, hey, give them some reality. Guns are a reality, they should respect them and understand how to use one. THat's life.

  41. Infrared by amabbi · · Score: 1

    Using an infrared laser versus a visible light laser to "decrease beam width" makes no sense; the minimum waist radius of a Gaussian laser is directly proportional to the wavelength of light; therefore using an IR laser with the same optics will give you an increase in beam width and an increase in divergence. Gaussian beam optics tutorial.

  42. Some random ideas. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1) Sensors on the gun, that if triggered, disable it for a few seconds.
    2) Somehow, build a bunch of smaller sensors, and by this I mean alot. If every person has to wear coveralls that have a few hundred sensors on them, it's alot harder to cheat and just cover yours with your hand.
    3) Have a wearable computer that interprets the sensor data. Not sure how to have it affect gameplay, but it seems you could tell the difference between a "kill" and a "flesh wound".
    4) If you have an arena of sorts, have sensors on the outdoor lights for night play. Would be cool to "shoot them out".
    5) Have lots of little 4" x 4" mirrors up in odd places, for bank shots.
    6) Have everyone wear GPS. Send the output to a modified quake server... let people from around the world watch the virtual version of the game.

    1. Re:Some random ideas. by SteveAstro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I actually built a commericial laser tag system in the early 1990s with a lot of the ideas in your post. We used early laser diodes (670nm) and had sensors on the gun and on jackets covering the front and back of the players. The system couldn't use RF in those days, so the scores, and who had shot who were downloaded through a neat beam modulation scheme, a PC displayed the rankings of all the players in the game.

      Unfortunately the people we developed it for were the kind of folks that might carry violin cases and made us an offer we couldn't refuse to go away and abandon the system when it failed to make them as much money as they had planned. We were pressured into building it too soon and after too little (destruction) testing. The development got so punishing I can vividly remember breaking down in the middle of the workshop when something went wrong during the deployment.

      I still have the plans and the code somewhere, though I could do all of it with much less gear than I had to use last time.

      And it worked in full sunlight too.

      Steve

    2. Re:Some random ideas. by torklugnutz · · Score: 1

      You are a genius. I think it's a bit much for a hobbist to implement though. It would certainly be a more fun way to play the game though. I would add mild electrical shock to the "wounded" area, or maybe vibration. Shock seems easier and more fun. I think GPS might not be quite accurate enough (14') or fast enough, but I'm going off my experience with my car unit. Perhaps an easier/cheaper way would be to use RFID tags and a series of sensors to triangulate position.

      Your post is not really anything that the article is looking for, but it's awesome brainstorming and really innovative and that's usually the best part of /.

      --
      Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
    3. Re:Some random ideas. by autophile · · Score: 1
      (6) Have everyone wear GPS. Send the output to a modified quake server... let people from around the world watch the virtual version of the game.
      Build an internet incorruptible by corps and goverments.

      How would building an internet incorruptible by corps and governments help? To allow everyone to watch the virtual version of the game without corporate interference?

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    4. Re:Some random ideas. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      I would refer you to the section of the FAQ that desscribes .sigs. There is none. Sucks to be you.

    5. Re:Some random ideas. by moxruby · · Score: 1

      What license is your project under?
      I ask because there are several DIY tag projects going on at the moment which all use TSOP sensors. TSOPs are not good in harsh sunlight and there is much ummming and ahhhing about building an analog sensor.

      If you were to release your schematics and code, you would be the hero of the DIY lasertag community :)

      Check out www.laserforums.com if your interested.

    6. Re:Some random ideas. by Zen+Punk · · Score: 0

      I would refer you to the section about using a line to make your signature easily distinguishable from the rest of your post, but there isn't one of those either.

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    7. Re:Some random ideas. by SteveAstro · · Score: 1

      If you email me, Id like to discuss it with you.

      Steve

    8. Re:Some random ideas. by moxruby · · Score: 1

      Hi Steve,

      Your email address is not visible so I can't seem to find it.

      You can email me: tristan [at) blackfrog (dot] org

      I'll probably be out of touch starting tomorrow for the next 8 or 9 days, so it's unlikely I'll be able to reply quickly.

      tristan.

  43. Shocker by ironicsky · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why not make it so when someone gets hit with the beam, they get a nice 9V shock, that'll teach them to get in the way of the beam, and it'd make the game more...interesting!

  44. Try this for size... by SecretSquirrel42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    IR and RF based...! http://www.oscmar.com (click on products)

    1. Re:Try this for size... by FlamerPope · · Score: 1

      This is actually the company responsible for making the MILES gear the post above mentions (or at least a relative of the system that seems to be marketed worldwide to law enforcement and military). They're located in New Zealand, but they were bought by Cubic Corporation, a California company that, according to this FAS article and their own website, actually provides MILES to the US military.

      --
      "If they send someone here, I'll arrange the usual 'accident.'" -- Alice, "Dilbert"
    2. Re:Try this for size... by SecretSquirrel42 · · Score: 1

      Mate... you should come down to work in our little country. The pay is good, the work is plentiful, the country is beautiful... down here... embedded engineers are wanted men (and women!) and outsourcing is unheard of. ;)

    3. Re:Try this for size... by Krezel · · Score: 1

      Ok I just lost 40 minutes of productivity to that website.

      That shit is cool. Somebody needs to set up a military "fantasy camp" where you can go play soldier with that stuff for a week or so.

    4. Re:Try this for size... by SecretSquirrel42 · · Score: 1

      The problem with that here is that to own an automatic weapon is somewhat illegal. And there are heavy restrictions on semi's. I suppose you could attach the gear to paintball markers and just fire "nothing". :) The Oscmar gear fires off the sounds and vibrations from the gun so you can't just tap it and fire the laser. :) Still, you're right about that... it would be very cool!

    5. Re:Try this for size... by terrymr · · Score: 1

      military "fantasy camp"

      I believe they call them Terrorist Training Camps now !

    6. Re:Try this for size... by AlienRelics · · Score: 1

      I'd be more impressed if they could spell "defense" correctly. Not "defence". Or maybe they train people in the art of taking down fences? ;')

  45. Man i feel sorry for your kids by eadint · · Score: 1

    This kind of modern day stewart smally psychology is pathetic.
    kids are the way they are for a reason. violence and competitiveness are part of our genes. and by doing what your doing you are crippling your kids. your children will be laughed at in school and they will be losers in life.
    you should be ashamed of yourself.

  46. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by Your_Mom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, how offtopic.

    Since we are showing anecdotal eveidence. I was also raised in a house with similar rules. No Bow either.

    I now play paintball, enjoy guns and play violent video games.

    *shrug*

    Feel free to keep congratulating yourself though.

    --
    Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
  47. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your kids will get the crap beat out of them in middle/high school.

    REmember, the other 2/3rds of the children are being raised with little to no parent supervision...

    the rich kid with the bmw get's his jollies by seeing how far he can push meeker kids. while the jocks simply havea n IQ of 30 (collectively) and walk around thinking... :must smash...

    then the other turds, the "i'm cool white trash" to the "we're cool sheep" called the goth crowd (yes you are fricking sheep copying everyone else... just like you tattooed idiots... doing exactly what others are doing, nothing damned origional.)

    they will get eaten alive if you dont traing them in martial arts so the firs time they find themselves cornered they can break some jock's arm without bating an eye. Oh and they need to act VERY crazy when they do it...

    I smashed one of the biggest bully's in my school's head through his locker. I was not bothered by any of the idiots for the rest of my school life as they were afraid that I would come unglued and possibly kill them.

    Bullies and jocks know one thing.... Pain. give them pain and they go away.

  48. Can you imagine? by x.Draino.x · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Some old geeks running around with laser tag shit shooting each other? Get some paintball guns and stop playing with your thilly lathers.

  49. I know! Throw rocks instead by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    You can't see lasers until they've either hit you or not hit you. You can see rocks coming, that's the best part! We just need softer rocks, maybe yellow soft rocks. Maybe we could name them based on the sound they make, like Boff or Nerf or something like that. Yeah, Nerf! That's the ticket!
    oh wait... DOH!

    --
    stuff |
  50. Laser Challenge V2 by auburnate · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The Laser Challenge V2 is known to have a wide beam width. It means you could hit a target 50 ft away by aiming anywhere from ~15 feet to the left of the target to ~15 feet to the right of the target. Definitely not realistic. A simple mod would be putting tape across the IR diode with a pin-sized hole in the tape. Play around with the diameter of the hole for best results.

    But as a side note, Laser Challenge V2 makes you wear the receiver on your chest, and its an easy thing to cover the receiver with your arms as you shoot at your opponents. You almost need multiple receivers which can monitor hits from all directions, but who wants to buy multiple Laser Challenge V2 setups for one person.

    Paintball turns your entire body into receivers. If you crank down the velocity of your markers, you increase the number of people than can stand ( pain threshold ) to get tagged by a paintball. Remember, safety first ( googles and cups? for our male /.ers ).

    1. Re:Laser Challenge V2 by TheLetterPsy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the hole will produce the same effect (diffraction). You will get spreading. What you need is a better (more expensive) laser that produces a more coherent pulse.

      If the vests respond to the typical red laser, I would say just use laser pointers instead, since their spread is fairly decent (gotta be less than 30 ft diameter at 50 yards).

    2. Re:Laser Challenge V2 by outcast36 · · Score: 1

      ( googles and cups? for our male /.ers ). I guess we need to google what relevance a cup would have. :)

      For slashdotters who don't enjoy violent sports, another term for cup is athletic supporter.

      Cue blank stares.

    3. Re:Laser Challenge V2 by plsander · · Score: 1

      Cups are not just for male combatants...

    4. Re:Laser Challenge V2 by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      goggles and cups, be a real man, wear no cup! In war will your enemy wait to shoot you until you but on body armor?

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    5. Re:Laser Challenge V2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A laser pointer will have a very narrow spread because it is a real laser as opposed to the gun beam. You could try extending the barrel and narrowing the aperture at the end. To make up for the reduction in output you could add another diode or two. Finally strap a laser pointer on top of the gun to use as a sight and for calibration. If you want more challenge you could also add a delay to the firing mechanism so that you would have to wait several seconds after each shot.

    6. Re:Laser Challenge V2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women belong inside at home. Bitch.

  51. The consequences aren't there by djktno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seeing a laser tag story allowed me to reminisce a little. I didn't even remember I had a laser tag system until I read the post. Then I remember why I forgot about it in the first place - paintball.

    What was lacking from the laser tag game was a reason to stay out of the way of the laser. No consequence to standing right out in the open, and as a kid, our games usually turned less fun after someone threw themselves into the line of fire for no reason.

    Enter paintball a few years later. I, for one, am not jumping out in front of a flying paintball. The consequence (and initial sting) keeps the game fun. I don't think I stand alone in this.

    Given the opportunity to play either, 99 times out of 100 I'm going to overlook laser tag without question.

    At one time I thought that the new laser tag things were so cool. Finally an answer to the stick-guns we usually ran around with. When I found out that I could thwart my opponents firing by turning my back, it wasn't quite the answer we were looking for. Turn your back to a paintball, you're just going to sting in a different place.

    I'm always a fan of modding things, but I can't see the point here when perfectly viable alternatives exist.

  52. Real life will surprise you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Away from you they are probably already enjoying hookers, crack, and murder.

    - if you can't enjoy a simple game of tag, one thing leads to another.

  53. Leyden jars by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, but what if their option is just to make it more fun? I say: Batteries + leyden jars + an electromagnetic switch triggered by a hit. Make those hits count!

    What I'd love to see is an Ender's Game type of thing in which the clothes freeze up in the areas they're hit in, but that would probably be too difficult.

    --
    "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
  54. Get you some training, son by uberR0ck · · Score: 1

    The gear is secondary to the tactics and employment of said gear.

    For an increase in the realism, go to paintball, airsoft, etc. Back when I was a kid, BBs were the way to go and they are only minimally affected by hiding behind tall grass. (always use eye protection, heh heh) Ten pumps on a red ryder will make you keep your head down.

    For a decrease in realism you could use rubber band or nerf guns. I hear water balloons are fun if you have the right kind of participants. {wink} {wink} {nudge} {nudge}

    Either way the tactics is the most interesting.

  55. we used to mod our guns... by rayde · · Score: 1
    a bunch of my friends and I played a lot of laser tag in high school. a number of us made simple mods to our equipment.. for example, wiring a simple switch onto the speaker, or onto the LED lights. this made the noisy standard gun that always gave away your position a stealth weapon.

    However, since only some of us had the know how to make these mods and they really gave us a big advantage, they were deemed illegal.

  56. the Deer Hunter by twitter · · Score: 1
    recommends real bullets. It's more interesting, that's for sure.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:the Deer Hunter by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Anything short of metal projectiles isn't "the real thing" anyway.

  57. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

    I know, replying to myself, but instead of just replying to one of the comments directed at me, I'll just do that here.

    So to answer those people who stated that kids should play with guns, please elaborate on why that is a good thing? Do you want them to play with knives too? How about matches? Or do you teach your children at all about the dangers of the world?

    Seems like a bunch of people with no children replying, I don't even know why I'm responding.

    *sigh*

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
  58. gnu-tag by wud · · Score: 2, Informative

    not sure if this helps, but you could try http://www.lasertag.de/

    --
    wud
  59. light sabers! by sinnfeiner1916 · · Score: 1

    not as random or inaccurate as a blaster, but a more eligant weapon for... more civilized times.

    --
    The More Laws, the less Justice --Marcus Tullius Cicero
  60. That's Easy by stinkyfingers · · Score: 2, Funny

    Set your phasers to STUN!

  61. meh by CabalistCAIN · · Score: 1

    Easy ones: Mirror armor. Mirror shelter. A dog with zapper on him (Imagine him running around the playing field and people running like all bejeezus to get out of the way :) ) Hard Ones: Surveillance Cameras around the playing field with a base commander to point and shoot them. Proxy Bombs that include a flashbulb for extra suprise. GPS tracking of team members on your pda. VERY Hard ones: Some kind of huge freakin' Death ray. I dunno maybe something that sprayed you with tuna fish.

  62. Sounds like 'Assassin'. by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    There are many varients of the game Assassin, and there was also a set of rules put out by Steve Jackson called Killer

    In Assassin, everyone had to fill out their class schedule, and include a picture, and give it to the person running the game. Everyone was given a card at random (redraw if you got your own card).

    The goal was to get your card -- but you weren't allowed to draw on anyone unless they were your target, or if they drew on you first (ie, they were trying to kill you).

    I'm guessing that these games wouldn't go down so well in today's high schools, though.

    There are some varients that aren't quite as obvious, but use your own judgement

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Sounds like 'Assassin'. by Teancum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No kidding.

      I was having problems with the police back in the 1980's. I can't even imagine what would happen now.

      One instance I know of was when a couple of kids in our "Assassin" group put on ski masks and had a shoot-out in a local mall. One of the shop owners called in the police, thinking we had just "killed" one of the other members of the group. The police were actually clueful enough to track down who the game admin was (a close friend of mine), and quitely had the game shut down without making it onto the evening news.

      Routinely we would have "shootouts" during the break between classes at school. Somehow I doubt that even a Supersoaker would get clearance today, because of similarities as a "weapon", or worse yet, it could have some sort of "biological" agent. I prefered a small cap gun that fired off rubber bullets. I know that would have been confiscated today by most police liason officiers, even before you got into the building. I even remember "concealing" the gun in an old book that we bought in a thrift store, by glueing the pages together and cutting out a hole in the pages for the shape of the gun. We left a few pages unglued so it could even be "read" if you were forced into using it as a book.

      Still, it is a fun game, and under a more controlled environment it still might be fun.

  63. Graveyards! by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We used to play laser tag at night in a nearby graveyard. We'd duck behind gravestones, which was always fun. Also, we had a rule that you're not allowed to shoot unless your chest plate was visible to whoever you were shooting at. Also, lasers bouncing off of glossy gravestones made things interesting.

    --
    Everything seemed to be going so nice
    'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
  64. Been working on a realistic laser tag replacement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...based on bullets and rifles for over 5 years. We have worked most all of the kinks. Any Slashdotters with experience involving sucking chest wounds? I feel this may be a detriment to our penetration into the recreational market space.

  65. MILES laser system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if it is possible to obtain a MILES emitters and vests? Legally that is. The actual MILES system used by US .mil would kick ass.

    All my buddies are ex military and own and fire guns. We could go out to the sticks miles from anything, with real rifles equipped with MILES, and have a blast playing capture the flag or similar objective based missions. That would totally kick ass, IMO. I even know where to buy blank bullets, which are actually hard to find when compared to the widely available real ammo. ;)

  66. Re:How about.. - you call that accurate ??? by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 0, Troll
    They are also fairly accurate. My M-4 can hit 40 out of 40 at about 20 meters. While not as impressive as paintball accuracy, it gives the game a more in-your-face feel. My psg-1 can hit from 100 meters fairly well...depending on wind.

    With an M-16 I can hit 2/3 targets at 300M, and 4/5 targets at 250M, and frankly I didn't miss under 250. I wouldn't be bragging at hitting things at 20 meters, that isn't even a challenge (the 1/2 height "close" targets on the range are at 50M)

    But you did say you wanted "in your face", yeah - but I prefer a kill from afar

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  67. Well by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I have a feeling if I ran around playing paintball, the HOA would fine my ass as I'd get paint on shit. However if I ran around playing laser tag, they'd probably not care (and even if they did, it's nota gainst the CCnR). Paintball is cool if you go to a place to play paintball, but what if you ard your roomates just want to go play a little game arond where you live?

    Plus if oyu own the gear you can run and duck all you like.

    1. Re:Well by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      and you wanted to play in a planned community, why? In Irvine the cops will come by if you're just walking on the wrong side of the street.

      (exaggeration)

    2. Re:Well by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      It's just where I live. It's not a planned community, it's a complex of condos. The cops won't give two shits (this is Tucson, they have real crime to worry about). I don't particularly like living somewhere with a board and dues but, well, I like my condo, and I like the price I paid for it. Pretty much it was a condo, or live much farther away from work.

      I'm just saying in general you can play laser tag where you can't play paintball. Laser tage doesn't affect anything other than its recievers. Paintball affects anything hit.

      If I ran around and played laser tag and someone bitched, I'd grab my CCnR's my law student roomate, and make the case that, as long as we aren't being disruptive, it's all fine. If I spattered the building with paint, well there'd be little I could do to argue since there is a section that covers that specificly.

      Likewise for the mall parking lot next door. I imagine security would let us run around there with laser tag gear. They've never bothered my about biking or other such things. I KNOW they kick us out for playing paintball.

  68. Buy a Tippman by robnator · · Score: 3, Informative

    Paintball -- the most fun you can have with your pants on.

    Seriously (OK, MORE seriously), you can paintball in many more environments than you can lasertag (plus you avoid the toxic complications of Zombie Smoke), and the (small but undeniable) pain of taking a hit is a far better motivator to stealthy movement and quick reactions than a bit of light.

    Cheers,
    Rob

    --
    "If...you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to be a horrible warning" - Catherine Aird
    1. Re:Buy a Tippman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err no. Flying a fighter plane is the most fun you can have with your clothes on. ;)

    2. Re:Buy a Tippman by robnator · · Score: 1

      ok... not having had the opportunity to try THAT one, I'll bow to superior experience.

      Cheers!

      --
      "If...you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to be a horrible warning" - Catherine Aird
    3. Re:Buy a Tippman by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      While you may be able to do it in more environments, you can do Lazer tag anywhere that has been prepped. It would cost maybe $1,000 per game if you were stupid enough to try and up a Paintball game in the middle of a city. Lazer tag may have more requirements, but the requirements are less than for paintball.

      But that is besides the point, your idea is off-topic, not on topic. We want to MOD the Lazertag, not play a different game.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    4. Re:Buy a Tippman by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      you can paintball in many more environments than you can lasertag

      Uh, what? No you can't. Try taking your paintball equipment down to a public park, see how fast you get arrested. Or around your neighborhood. Or indoors. Or anywhere there might possibly be non-participants, buildings, or other things that people wouldn't want to see covered in colored in paintball fluids.

      Lasertag is infinitely more flexible in where you can play.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  69. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    Perhaps people don't understand why you think your childern should be punching bags. Who do you expect to defend them and how much should they take before they fight back.

    The real world isn't like that.

  70. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by shmokey · · Score: 1

    You are gonna have some weak nerdy kids what with the Renfesting and the no REAL fighting experience. Hell if I hadn't fought with my brother as a child the number of times that my ass would have gotten pounded as an adolescent is huge. While I don't agree with condoning violence, my belief is that it is not good to never let your children give/receive an ass beating now and again. Please don't think im critcising your parenting at all. Just commenting on how violence helped me growing up. I suppose it depends on where you grew up as well...

    --
    http://samtron.cjb.net
  71. Taser Lag by stinkyfingers · · Score: 1

    1. Go out and get a couple of tasers.
    2. Aim and shoot.
    3. Rinse and repeat

  72. Re:How about.. - you call that accurate ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you talking about a real M16 because I don't think the other guy is talking about a real M-4

  73. My $0.02 by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

    - My first thought would be to put a lens over the end of the gun to focus it. Maybe with a focal length of around 10-50 feet; you could probably even use a cheap lens from a disposable camera or similar to accomplish this. I admit that I'm no expert on the matter, but a little google-ing should turn up some help.
    - Get a laser gun. I've been to places that use lasers instead of IR, and people show up all the time with their own equipment and whup my butt all over the place.
    - Go paintballing, it's much more realistic than any IR / laser game, and you get the "force feedback" effect that's absent with light-based games.

    --

    - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  74. Hot New Tech, ditch the old style laser guns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    With summer here again our thoughts turn to the outdoors, and for two years, my peers and I have tried to find plans online for augmenting our laser tag gear to make it more realistic. We're not engineers, but also figured it can't be that hard to do something with some kind of infrared laser to decrease the beam width. What other sorts of inexpensive things could be added to our gear to make it more interesting? We're using the popular Laser Challenge V2 kits, but any brand at all would be interesting.
    The preferred beam width for outdoor play is .689 inch. This new, high tech gear uses chemical and gas fuel sources - much like the military's new flying anti-missile laser. Power supplies vary in size from a few grams to a few pounds, and can be customized to the user's preference. The gear itself is fairly inexpensive and can be purchased used with a fair degree of confidence in it's reliability. The best thing about this kit is hit detection - shots either miss or get counted, and since the aim point is visible while firing, you know where you hit.

    "Not being engineers", you guys would probably be healthy and strong enough to use this kind of gear - it's a far step forward from the Laser Challenge V2 kits.

    A fair bit of warning - Much like every other solution, if you move your games outdoors and make your equipment more realistic, the odds of being questioned, detained, or killed by police start to add up. Please play responsibly.
  75. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by dknight · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, if it makes you feel any better, when I have kids, I'm going to teach them as much about violence as I can. Extensive martial arts training, stuff like that.

    Hey, maybe my kids and your kids can get together and play, and my kids can beat up your kids! Wouldnt that be fun!?

    Ok, just kidding. I do fully plan on teaching any/all kids I have as much about self-defense as I possibly can, and that will include extensive training with guns, knives, and "common items" which can be used as weapons in a pinch. I also will be teaching them, from the beginning, the seriousness of what they are learning. There is nothing wrong with letting your kids know how to handle themselves when push comes to shove, just make sure they understand the responsibility that goes with their knowledge.

    But maybe that's just me. I always resented my parents for being overly protective in that regard, and not giving me the opportunity to learn how to defend myself - a problem I took upon myself to rectify.

  76. Some points... by cmowire · · Score: 1

    Avoid lasers. The laser-tag-ish games with leagues forbid lasers of any sort because the eye-risk is just too high, especially with magnifying lenses on the sight. Just use an IR LED with better optics and a thinner beam.

    I'd say that the big thing is that you want to preserve the notion of combat. So you really need sensors in many places around the body, so that you can run and duck and hide and still get a head shot off.

    I'm betting that some fun could be had with a "suicide bomb" option, where you kill yourself and anybody in range. ;)

  77. What if.. by cbovasso · · Score: 5, Funny

    you synthesize excited bromide in an argon matrix?

    Ive seen it work before. You could probably generate a 6MW beam!

    Chris.

    --
    I ask for a car and I get a computer. How's about that for being born under a bad .sig?
    1. Re:What if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would work about as well as making a machine to enter a sweepstakes thousands of times so you win all the prizes.

      -Lazlo

    2. Re:What if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or filling a house full of popcorn and firing a laser at it to pop it all...

    3. Re:What if.. by GamerGeek · · Score: 1

      True but all you could use it for would be to make pop-corn.

  78. sounds like highlander by bziman · · Score: 1
    Provide each player with a locator and a gun. Rig the locators to let you know when an opponent (also with a locator) is within a certain range (ie. 50 yds.). Begin panicked drawing of gun and be the first to find and kill the opponent.
    Sounds like Highlander, but with guns instead of swords...

    "One of us is nearby... there can be only one!!!"

  79. Cut LQ some slack by addie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was an employee for two years when I was in high school, and I have heard many of the same complaints before. The fact is, LQ is not the same as paintball by any stretch of the imagination. It's a much simpler game, and that is so kids of ALL ages can play. I would not expect anyone over 15 or 16 to really enjoy LQ, it's the little ones that get a kick out of it. To respond to a few of your points:

    The incentive to not getting shot is points
    Well, the ONLY goal of the game to win, and winning is based on points... So losing points is bad, therefore one should avoid being hit

    No running or ducking
    Again, this is a game for kids AND teens. Imagine a fourteen year old running top speed with his hard plastic laser out front, and turning a corner. Smack into the head of an eight year old. Switch that to an eight year old running full speed, smack into the crotch of an adult. It hurts. Trust me. As for ducking, it's a dark maze, and we want to avoid injuries as much as possible. You may think it's lame, but again, this is not a hardcore game.

    Electrodes on the vest
    Again, see above points. We wouldn't have too many birthday parties coming back if all the kids were bawling their eyes out because of electrical shocks, whether they hurt or not.

    The fact is, LQ and Paintball have thier own audiences, and you should be aware of that before slamming the game. If you want something fast paced, mature, and semi-dangerous, then play paintball. If you want to take 30 ten year olds to a birthday party game that all of them can enjoy safely, go to LaserQuest. These points of course also apply to the original posted question.

    As a final point, if you want to win at LaserQuest, then move slowly, and stay quiet. Sound is the single most important factor in that game. You may note the hardcore players covering the speaker on their gun...

    1. Re:Cut LQ some slack by SilentSheep · · Score: 1

      When my friend was playing LaserQuest he walked round a corner and got a gun in the face from someone who was running(when they shouldnt have been) he had his 2 front teeth knocked out!!! So you can see why the rules are there!

      --
      .
    2. Re:Cut LQ some slack by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Again, this is a game for kids AND teens. Imagine a fourteen year old running top speed with his hard plastic laser out front, and turning a corner. Smack into the head of an eight year old. Switch that to an eight year old running full speed, smack into the crotch of an adult. It hurts. Trust me. As for ducking, it's a dark maze, and we want to avoid injuries as much as possible. You may think it's lame, but again, this is not a hardcore game.

      Uh, the people that run the game are stupid if they put 8 year olds, 14 year olds, and adults out at the same time. I played laser tag back somewhere around 1984. This was before there were stupid rules like "no running." You could jump off the second story over the railing for all they cared. They did try to match up participants some so that there wouldn't be the little kids getting stomped on. There was a running total for the day, so if you wanted to keep dropping $6-7 (or whatever, but I remember being it a lot for a teen in the 80s) you'd get your name in lights for the daily high scores.

      The equipment was damn heavy. I'd leave with bruises om my hips from the battery pack. I'd be dripping with sweat.

      There was a lot of strategy involved. It was best to travel in teams. If one got shot, the other could hit the shooter. The heavy helmet kept down the rapid head movement, so it was easier to have someone with you to watch each other's backs. And when you ran across a group of the other team, an additional gun always helped. But, unless you were in a defensive position, larger groups were useless. The effort required to keep 6 strangers in a coherent group far exceeded the benefits.

      There was smoke, light, noise, and other stuff, so stealth was not as important. You'd run from spot to spot, unless you wanted to snipe. There were very few places you could effetively snipe from, unless you timed it right and could pop unseen around a corner, shoot someone, then hide before they saw you, and repeat the process every 7 seconds (or whatever the minimum was for the reset).

      Hmmm. It's been a long time since I though about that... Those were fun days. Though because of cost I only went once or twice.

  80. Urban laser tag by smatt-man · · Score: 0

    Cut down the sensors so they look less obvious, dress in your favorite gang colors and run through the streets and Wal-Mart with your friends. Unless you were looking for combat realism, then nevermind...

    --

    ---
    Lousy rotten karmic retribution.
  81. To make laser tag interesting,... by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    you need one of two things:

    a) Nudity (which presupposes a mixed gender group or at least a group interested in each others gender) which thus provides the possibility (though unlikely given the laser take croud) or improptu sex.

    or

    b) An unknowing population in the arena -- as others have suggested, playing the game in an urban area unaware of the game ads the element of police officers and atf types seeing you run around hinding and pointing guns -- and thus the added risk of being actually blown to hell.

    Either way, your juices should really flow.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  82. Symbol Bar Code Reader Modification by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

    Perhaps someone could modify the symbol bar code reader gun (the type used in cash registers) for use in the laser tag game. It would not be very realistic I suppose but it would be pretty funny.

  83. Ender's Game by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm... actually, do you think this would work?

    For each joint, do the following:
    Take a small-diameter piece of pipe, and wrap it with heating coil. Seal off one end. Wrap around the pipe with insulation to prevent burns, but not so much that heat won't be able to escape. Fill most of the inside of the pipe with sauter, leaving just enough room for a large diameter nail to be inserted. Insert the nail, which should be long enough to not be completely enclosed when fully inserted. Seal off the opening enough to prevent sauter from leaking when melted. Weld the nail's outside end to a hinge, which is in tern welded structure that can be fitted firmly around one side of the body's joint. Do the same with the pipe. Further insulate the whole thing.

    Repeat with each joint, and for tougher joints, use several.

    Then, modify the laser tag system so that when it's been started, it activates the heating system for all joint limiters. When a hit is detected, the heating coil is shut off for a joint. In seconds, the limiter should become stuck. At the end of a game, they could be reactivated, heating back up and thawing the joint, or simply removed by removing the parts that wrap firmly around the sides of your joints.

    Would this work, or not? And more importantly, would it be a lawsuit waiting to happen?

    --
    "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    1. Re:Ender's Game by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      By "sauter", do you mean solder?

      It sounds unbelievably dangerous. I haven't got past that to figure out if it would work. How about a system that doesn't involve molten metal?

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Ender's Game by MadBiologist · · Score: 1

      Yes...

      --
      'Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?'
    3. Re:Ender's Game by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      There are easier ways to do this. Instead of molten metal, try

      electronically limited motors. these joints would be connected to low voltage electronics, like lazer tag sensors. these motors would provide slight resistance to your normal movement, but would 'lock up' if you sent an electrical signal to them.

      I'm sure there's a material out there that becomes stiff and rigid when electricity is applied (or not), and fluid and moveable when not. and could work with a lot less energy than the solution you propose.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    4. Re:Ender's Game by Rei · · Score: 1

      Can you name such a material? What sort of motor would be involved with your joints?

      --
      "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    5. Re:Ender's Game by scottp1296 · · Score: 1

      You mean a material like this?

    6. Re:Ender's Game by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      Electronically controlled stepper motors are what come to mind initially. These motors have variable 'limit switches' which prevent them from moving beyond a certain point. When I worked in the semiconductor industry, we had probe stations which had x/y/z dimension movement functions... this platform had to have a very small movement tolerance, and through software you could set what size wafer you were working on / how far the table could move. there's a way in software you can set the movement size to be very small, so the motor would only move very slightly. otherwise, there's a braking system in the motor that provides resistance to being moved beyond that point.

      so with microprocessors you could have a motor which has a very large movement range, but when signalled by the lasertag equip sets the movement range to nil. if the motor is made correctly (strong enough) it should prevent the joints in a suit (say aluminum rods running through a jumpsuit) from bending.

      however, building a suit with those kinds of universal joints would be expensive and heavy.

      of the materials i referred to before, I don't know of one specifically, however, I'm sure one exists. Also, instead of molten metal, if i were to use nature, i'd use a thin layer of water in a plastic suit, with an insulated liner. then use CO2 or liquid nitrogen to freeze the water.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    7. Re:Ender's Game by Rei · · Score: 1

      It only gets as hard as rubber... but it could probably manage fine if you use it as some sort of pneumatic fluid. I wonder how much something like that costs?

      --
      "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    8. Re:Ender's Game by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      I'd not use a motor, just a locking mechanism. Something that looks like a knee brace, but freely moves until the locking pin is engaged. The only time it's powered is when the lock changes positions, and you'd only need a solenoid.

    9. Re:Ender's Game by Rei · · Score: 1

      ... a solenoid *per joint*. And pin-locking mechanism per joint. Still, might be feasable.

      --
      "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    10. Re:Ender's Game by wooley-one · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The way you describe seems really cumbersome and frankly, dangeous as hell.

      It might be useful to look at what is known as a vacuum mattress. This device is used to immobilize patients at accident scenes. It works by pumping air out of a sleeve filled with styrofoam pellets. The sleeve then becomes rigid.

      A similar device could be fashioned by creating a sleeve that is worn around a joint, when not under vacuum it would bend relatively easily. Then when a hit was registered, the air could be pumped out renering the joint immobile.

      The tricky part would revolve around routing of tubing to a central pump, or the usage of seperate pumps for each joint.

    11. Re:Ender's Game by Rei · · Score: 1

      Interesting concept; however, would it go into a preset angle, or would it keep the current angle? Forcing a joint to a particular angle at an arbitrary point in time could be dangerous.

      --
      "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    12. Re:Ender's Game by corsec67 · · Score: 1
      when you suck the air out of this, generally called a "bean bag", it takes the current shape, and holds it really well. that is why it is so comfortable, and used on patients on a strecher.

      I think that putting these around joints would work pretty well, as they are already used for medical purposes, and to imobilize people at that. It would not hurt, unless it frezzes you up as you are moving, so a sound and gradual change would work well. Maybe a vibrator in there to also let the person know where they have been shot too. But, that is getting bulky and expensive.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    13. Re:Ender's Game by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "Fill most of the inside of the pipe with sauter"

      I think the word you want is 'solder', pronounced 'sodder' (don't ask me why).

      It melts at several *hundred* degrees. Oh, by the way, it's usually made of tin and lead. Some players might not survive the first game. Literally.

      How about this as a less deadly alternative:

      Build a suit where all the areas around joints (knees and elbows, maybe hips and wrists too) are made of or contain some inflatable material and a CO2 cartridge. You get hit, a valve is opened which fills the suit joint with CO2 - instant stiff joint. Depending on the design and pressure, you might really not be able to move.

      I don't think it's practical, but it won't actively kill off the players.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    14. Re:Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, solder has always been pronounced sol-der as far as I know, with a very noticeable l.

      Accents do some disturbing things to a language....

    15. Re:Ender's Game by MasterSLATE · · Score: 1

      A vibrator in there might lead to other uses... Hot chick: "Hey, shoot my upper thigh again. PLEASE"

      --

      [sig]www.masterslate.org[/sig]
    16. Re:Ender's Game by WhteKnght · · Score: 1

      If I remember the materials science demo from college correctly, a corn starch solution has the property of acting as a solid when a voltage is applied. A small piston on the side of the brace, filled with such a solution would do exactly as you are talking about.

      If I am wrong about it being actual corn starch that does it, I can at least confirm that such a solution does exist. The were looking into the posibility of using it for vehicle shocks (adjusting the stiffness of the shock based on the terrain to be traversed).

    17. Re:Ender's Game by dedalus2000 · · Score: 1

      water and starch with the right mix become rigid when an electric field is applied.

      --
      My keyboads not woking popely.
    18. Re:Ender's Game by kevmit · · Score: 1
      "...a valve is opened which fills the suit joint with CO2 - instant stiff joint..."
      Or perhaps the suits could be outfitted with IV viagra pumps?
    19. Re:Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm ... that would probably be expensive. I seem to remember reading something in Scientific American ... something like this that might be less expensive.

    20. Re:Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe in your language, but in English it's pronounced 'sotter' or 'sodder' - see a dictionary.

  84. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    I've got two kids, but they're 2.5 and 10 months so I can't compare.

    Speaking as a kid who never got a gun bought for him, it builds irresponsibility when peer pressure and your 'own' money the first opportunity you get to by a non-bullet projectile firing gun you do so, don't tell your parents, and then shoot your best friend in the face embedding a BB in his chin and breaking a tooth out of face - permanently.

    If you are involved with your children, and introdcue them to a BB gun or whatever when we are in an environment that promotes 'playing' with weapons for any reason the parent needs to be involved and aware. Taking the stance of 'you can't have one' just makes the child go around the parent and learn the hard way vs. learning the right way.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  85. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by shmokey · · Score: 1

    The problem with this logic is that children cannot yet understand the seriousness of what they are learning. I don't think that teaching a kid "martial arts" is gonna help them that much anyway. Just let 'em go at. If you feel that training is necessary Amateur Wrestling would be the way to go. Nearly every fight I've ever been in ended up on the groud. Chokes and locks are a bitch(ever see the Gracies on UFC?). Especially if the other opponent is untrained.

    --
    http://samtron.cjb.net
  86. laser tag is not a laser. by mr_burns · · Score: 1

    The laser tag pistols themselves are not lasers. They are just an infrared light focused by a lens. Basically a tv remote with a trigger. So here we have 2 options for widening the beam: use a different lens or use one of the guns to program a universal remote and play with that instead.

    Use your imagination, it's just a flashlight.

    --
    "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
    1. Re:laser tag is not a laser. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > use one of the guns to program a universal remote and play with that instead.

      Yeah! Half of you could wear velour shirts, and the other half could dress up as Klingons!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  87. Yes but that's a real M16 by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is just a little difference. The real M16 shoots 5.56mm lead slugs at a velocity of about 950m/s. Airsoft guns shoot 6mm plastic pellets at a velcotiy of around 30-100m/sec depending on gun type. Now not only should it be apparant that the gun won't even shoot 300m, it should be equally apparant that it is far less accurate. He isn't talking about the accuracy of the shooter, rather the accuracy of the gun. For a real fiream, this is nothing special. It should be essentially dead on at 20m. For a plastic BB gun, that's a little different.

  88. not quite a mod, but... by ChipMonk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back when I was in college, and Laser Tag was relatively new, some smart-aleck wag figured out that it was nothing more than a glorified remote control.

    He got a programmable remote (a real one, that read another remote's signal, then duplicated it), put the Laser Tag signal into it, and voila! He had the Laser Tag equivalent of a sawed-off shotgun. He could take out several players at once with it. And often did.

    1. Re:not quite a mod, but... by staynz79au · · Score: 1

      I used to play indoor laser skirmish at both a regional and (once) a national level. I also spent a couple of years referee-ing the regionals. What you've described here is pretty much what the ref's use to deduct points and remove players from the game.

      --
      Awww... I wanted to explode - GIR
    2. Re:not quite a mod, but... by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

      Oh, please. This was a bunch of college kids trying to out-do each other. There were no referees, and the only rule was that you had to make the equipment signal a hit. How you did that was up to you.

    3. Re:not quite a mod, but... by staynz79au · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm not talking about the packs you buy from a store, I'm talking about a full on game that has regional, national and even international tournaments. I'm not talking about a bunch of college kids either I'm talking about guys and girls from 15 - 50 who love it as a SPORT and want to be the best there is at it. There are plenty of rules and regulations and being a ref was a great experience. I don't belittle your acheivements so don't belittle mine. I was VERY proud to make the national team and consider it an honour to have played with the people that I did.

      --
      Awww... I wanted to explode - GIR
  89. Laser pointers! by Max_Abernethy · · Score: 0

    Mount one of these. Years ago, all us neighborhood kids would put regular red lasers on Laser Challenge guns and played at night. We would have gone apeshit over the green ones, though obviously there's cost to take into consideration.

  90. Magnifying Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    We used to play some lasertag in highschool. My personal favorite hack used a magnifying glass and a poster tube to make a long-range sniper-style rifle.

    CONSTRUCTION: basically, i took the IR LED and lens off the old gun. securely insert the proper size magnifying glass lens into one end the the poster tube. Insert a plastic cup that fit inside the other end of tube, but can slide forward and backward in the tube.

    ALIGNMENT: using a penlight, stuck through the opening in the plastic cup, determine the focal length of the setup. In a dark room, you can project an image of the lightsource onto a wall by adjusting the distance from the cup to the lens. find the proper locationa and mark it.

    FINAL ASSEMBLY: put the LED from the gun into the cup at the end of the tube. remove all excess cardboard of the tube. Firmly attach to the gun. (we used duct tape).Go out and test!

    RESULTS: basically this allows you to focus the beam more tightly. the downside is that you have less cross sectional area to the beam. this makes things harder to hit. the upside is that you have a more concentrated beam. this means it travels father. In side-by-side tests with fresh batteries, the modified gun shot fully 3 times further, but you had to be DAMN accurate.

    get a good optics book (or even a general physics text) for more on the lens setup.

    1. Re:Magnifying Glass by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Try the following, for a Shotgun like device: Get several IR leds. How many is your choice. Shove em all together in the end of a toilet paper tube. Alignment isn't important, just make sure they don't shoot backwards (tinfoil on a cardboard back can be good for this) Connect in parallel. Add extra batteries. Fire. Everything in the way gets shot. The most fun is a hemisphere of the things. Also, if you have a good sized plastic sphere of some sort, put lots of IR leds through holes in it. As many as possible. Use a 555 timer & a switch to turn them all on after a delay. You now have a grenade/bomb.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    2. Re:Magnifying Glass by gregmckone · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this result in you shooting people upside down since the beam has to travel through the magnifying glass?

      --
      "Sometimes you've got to kick at the darkness till it bleeds daylight" Bruce C0ckburn
  91. mods? by KillaKen187 · · Score: 1

    Why not do what all case modders do... Add a window kit and a neon light. This way at night you can use the light to see where you are going.

  92. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you should teach them about guns much as you taught them about the bow and arrow. both are weapons and both are dangerous. you say you taught your kids to respect the bow, well you could do the same with guns. much as you've done with knives and matches.. i fail to see why you totally ignore the gun altogether and pretend it doesn't exist..

  93. Don't use a laser LED, use a plain LED. by Paul+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    People always talk like using a laser would help, but I don't think so. You want it to be:
    1. an intense beam;
    2. a narrow (almost collimated) beam;
    3. but not too narrow;
    4. the right color of light; and
    5. cheap.

    Item 1 can be accomplished with a laser LED, but I think that would be overkill. In fact, it's a little dangerous. It's likely that somebody will get it in the eye eventually, and that might lead to a permanent injury. I would buy a bright LED and replace the bulb with it. Maybe I would use a small resistor to bias it. My set takes 6 AA batteries. This will surely provide enough voltage.

    Item 2 is almost accomplished with the lenses onboard. It would be a little hard to move them. You might just add a small lens when you install the LED. I wouldn't bother.

    Item 3: Why bother with all the fussing about with lenses? I want a spread. My aim is lousy!

    Item 4: The reciever may have a narrow band reciever so you may need to use a special color. I know that for my Laser Tag set the color is green. LEDs are available in red, orange, yellow green, and blue. The spectrum of a laser is extremely narrow. If you buy a red laser LED (say 632 nm), and your reciever is green (500 nm), you won't get anything. The spectrum of the ordinary LED is quite broad, so you will probably hit the right wavelength if you match it by eye.

    Item 5: Yeah, you know it's cheap this way. You could even put 3 or 4 of them in there and still not hit the $1 mark (unless you shop at Radio Shack, then they'll be $1.19 each--sucker!).

    I would take out the old bulb, remove the glass, and solder an LED onto the contacts (so as not to damage the original gun with my mod). I might add a resistor for biasing (really depends on the voltage of the socket). I might use a potentiometer so that I can dial up the brightness. I might take out the green filter. Maybe not. It shouldn't attenuate the beam that much.

  94. What do you mean by augmenting? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Really what do you want to improve about it.
    The whole making it hurt idea has already been said. Paintball and the plastic BBs and all that.
    Do you want longer range? You could replace the IR LED with an IR Laser and make a sniper rifle. Just make sure that you wear eye protection.

    How about IR gernades. A bunch of leds and a battery with a timer. Just press the buttion and toss.
    IR shot buns. a lens that spreads the beam out more but also shortens the range.
    IR Claymores.
    IR landmines.
    I mean use your imagination.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  95. Realistic modding by Jim+Hall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the day when LazerTag was really popular, someone sold a "GI Joe" knockoff that was compatible with the LazerTag gear. The only down-side was that the "GI Joe" receptor didn't count to 5 like LazerTag receptors (minor mod required.) And the whole thing looked fugly.

    So, I went to Radio Shack and picked up a plastic kit casing, and re-housed the modded board in the new casing. It was just a plain black box with a round receptor window, but it did the job.

    The really cool mod was the gun. I took it apart and put it in a water gun housing that looked exactly like an M4A1 carbine. (You may think of it as a "short M16.) Yes, it really looked like that! It was even the real size and everything. I instantly became the cool guy at LazerTag parties, although I had to keep the gun out of sight until after dark. (And we only played in empty fields owned by people we knew.) Other guys painted their LazerTag rifles to look cool (camo was popular) but I had a freaking M4!

    My M4 had a decent range, but I didn't try to keep the beam tight. As a result, it acted like a high-power shotgun. Great for open fields, not so great when I followed one guy into a barn. :-(

    1. Re:Realistic modding by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      I instantly became the cool guy at LazerTag parties.

      Proof that cool is indeed relative.

    2. Re:Realistic modding by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      Great, our friends at world.guns.ru apparently didn't like the minor slashdotting on the jpeg image. It's unavailable if the referrer is slashdot. If you missed it, it was just a photo of the M4A1 - I can still get it if I cut/paste the URL into a different Mozilla tab.

  96. Paintball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you could try paintball. These guys ( http://www.tactical-paintball.com ) sell some VERY realistic paintball markers...magazine fed, no "hopper" and the CO2 tank is concealed in the stock of the gun. Pretty sweet stuff!!!

  97. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

    Hey, thanks for pointing this out. I didn't make myself clear enough before. I'm not saying that my children shouldn't learn about the real world, and I do teach them about that, but that's different than thinking that hurting other people is a form of entertainment.

    My oldest is 8, and we are considering sending him to karate or tae kwan do. If I were a gun person (i.e. own or use), I would certainly teach my children how to handle them and fire them.

    There's just a difference of opinion about teaching your children about violence and that it is not a good thing, and at the same time teaching them how to deal with it appropriately.

    God what a bag of worms I opened. Really, it's not my fault, I just was commenting on the second article linked about parents wanting to ban violent toys!

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
  98. This coming from a BMX dork? by FatSean · · Score: 0

    Last time I rode a bicycle on a ramp was in middle school.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:This coming from a BMX dork? by NickABusey · · Score: 1
      You're right, I forgot how dorky BMX is.

      Another BMX Sissy

      --

      - Nick Busey
      www.pedalbmx.com
      www.nickbusey.com
  99. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

    Allowing your kids to play with (toy)guns is a good thing because:
    1. It provides an outlet for naturally-occurring aggression that is cheaper and safer than Ritalin

    2. It stimulates fantasy and role-playing, and encourages the discernment between fantasy and reality (with parental influence, of course). The kids can see and feel for themselves that a plastic gun is 'fake'.

    3. Keeping things away from your kids supposedly because they're dangerous when they're really not undermines your credibility as a parent. (Dad says that guns kill people, but Billy's sister is still walking around after Billy shot her. I guess Dad doesn't know what he's talking about. Oh look - a stove!)

    4. They're going to when your back is turned anyway. You can be part of the process or not (no, don't swing it - look through the sights like this ...)

    I want my kids to know, understand and master the dangerous reality of our world, and that's why I teach them to play with and use guns, knives and matches.

  100. Making the beam more narrow... by francisew · · Score: 1

    Easy to do. Get a lens (convex, glass better than plastic, so it doesn't absorb the IR). Try surplusshed.com or something. Any lens that'll fit into a tube you like (maybe into the gun's barrel). Make a disc of the same-diameter, and drill a small hole into it. Glue it into place inside the barrel/tube one focal length of the lens from the end of the tube. Next glue the lens into the end of the tube. This will collimate the light, causing the light to travel in a straight line, giving a focused dot.

    If you want to get it into a good focus, try taking a light bulb, and assemble the tube/pinhole with the light bulb on the side of the pinhole. If the lens is at the right distance, a dot of visible light should be visible on the far wall. (you are imaging the pinhole onto the wall.) Advantages: narrow beam width, cheap, easy to build, pretty tough. Disadvantages: lose lots of signal, can't cheat as easily :P.

    Good luck
  101. It's called MILES by L-Train8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's called the Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System, or MILES. It's been in use in the army since the 80's. They even make sensors for tanks and Humvees, as well as individual soldiers. The laser transmitter attaches to the barrel of an actual M-16, and is activated by the sound from the firing of blanks, so you approximate the noise and weapon kickback you would with firing an actual round.

    Some links (the second with pictures):
    http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/miles.htm
    http://www.peostri.army.mil/PRODUCTS/MILES/

    --

    Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
    1. Re:It's called MILES by Caraig · · Score: 1

      MILES is suitable for war games and similar OPFOR/Red Flag exercises, but the dynamics of a 5.56mm blank and a 5.56mm FMJ round are significant. A blank just will not feel the same as a real round. I'm not exactly sure what it is, if the mass of the round travelling down the barrel has something to do with it, or if the charge in the blank is weaker than in the combat round, or what.

      That being said, MILES is certainly preferable to range-only training, and having soldiers run around with wooden or unloaded rifles shouting 'BANG!' at each other. =)

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    2. Re:It's called MILES by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 1
      Speaking from experience, MILES is garbage, imho. First there is the complete lack of range. In daylight situations the IR from the transmitters is drown out within 100 ft. What good is that, considering that a close shot for an M16 is 100meters?

      Then there is the fact that if you bump the butt stock mildly hard, it will trigger the recoil sensor in the transmitter (not fire a blank, mind you, just make the transmitter go off). I've seen guys do 3-5seconds rushes, use thier rifle as a fall breaker (like you are supposed to) and have their own weapon trigger thier head sensors.

      Next you have the constant jamming caused by blanks, even with the blank adaptor properly installed. The M16 isn't very reliable to begin with, but with blanks it's useless.

      The seonsors are very heavy, for what they are, and aren't very sensitive. That combined with the complete lack of accuracey from the transmiter means you can't hit shit without spraying random shots all around your target. I qualify expert most of the time with an M16, but can't score a hit more than 50% of the time.

      They also suffer from the pitfalls of all other laser tag, such as the sensors only covering selected areas (not your legs, for example).

      Put one of the adaptors on a SAW (automatic 5.56mm weapon, for all you civilians) and you actually have something usefull, only because you can spray out 100's of rounds in a matter of seconds, effectively making an IR wall. But, for accurate and/or single shot (M16) weapons, MILES is a waste of effort.

      Rob

  102. Upgrade to the real thing. by catwh0re · · Score: 1
    Upgrade to real weapons grade lasers. You know you've won because you are the sole survivor.

    Additionally a higher setting can be used to totally vapourise your opponents creating real suspense in those show down situations.

  103. I am Unfamiliar with V2. by ChozCunningham · · Score: 1
    However, the most unrealistic issues in most commercial-class equipment is

    Pulse timing.Not only does an overly-long pulse duration let players cheesily "hose" the arena, but it kills batteries faster. A shorter pulse creates a more technical and responsive game.This may be done in harware with a rheostat, or require some sort of chip flash to adjust.

    Retaliation time. the time after receiving shot that one can still fire; this should be only long enough to allow a shot if the trigger was in mid pull when hit. Will require some tweaking to perfect. Any longer destroys the already meager consequences of a hit. Also requires some major chip-foolery. These 2 changes will make a more robust game by far.

    Sync. If there are odd delays between trigger-pull, beam and sound, you will have as much fun as a novice palm user with graffiti has.

    Shiny housings, poor sensors. It is incredibly frustrating to see a legitimate hit get ignored, especially since most equipment exposes the firer on trigger pull. Often there are not enough sensors to really detect a beam's strike from angles where the users percieve a sensor to be. Equipment that has a shell over the sensors also causes problems.

    MaterialsGet as many sensors as your group can stand to wear, and if possible make sure that center-of-mass hits are longer than limbs. Last of all, make your own gun shells. Nobody seems to make a solid, balanced off-the-shelf gun.

    I have run hundreds of laser tag events for novices and competitiion class players, designed and tested competition game formats, and competed in the Zone Internationals.

    And to all the paintball loving smartasses, didn't you read the question? If paintball is a "more realistic mod" to a Laser Tag setup, is live ammo an "even more realistic" solution? Tryit, and let us Taggers know how that works out. Or just realize that good laser tag is simply a different experience, and not one you experienced at Qzar one time.

  104. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by DMadCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have two children and my wife feels pretty much the same way you do about guns and children.

    My own view is a little more realistic. We live in a world where violence, whether we like it or not, is a reality. While I have never owned an actual projectile weapon (what purpose would it serve in suburbia other than to get into trouble shooting holes in things?) I did however have plenty of toy guns growing up. Later, I fired weapons (M-16s) while in the Air Force.

    Amazingly enough, though I've never been sat down and explained the nature and dangers of guns, my exposure to such things (including the main topic of laser tag guns) hasn't yielded a psychotic lunatic nor even a mild gun fanatic. To be honest I'm with the crowd that was able to figure out what a gun was on his own (kids really aren't stupid if you give them half a chance) and will take them one way or the other. A weapon in the hands of someone with no morales is a bad thing. A weapon in the hands of a responsible person is a good thing. A toy in the hands of anyone is still just a toy.

    I suppose the question is, do you fear weapons or do you fear your children can't make correct decisions on their own?

  105. What about PHOTON? by Brew+Bird · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does no one remeber PHOTON? Damn that game was so cool...

    1. Re:What about PHOTON? by GamerGeek · · Score: 1

      How about Captian Power? You could play AGAINST the TV. For thouse of us lacking social companionship, TV was GOD!

  106. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by Willis+Wasabi · · Score: 1

    Ok, how about from the other side. Although I'm plenty old enough and married, I don't have kids. I do however have parents.

    They started to raise me your way. They realized their mistake when I got bullied by a girl. They spent a lot of time to undo what they previously taught me. My siblings were not raised that way.

    Violence is part of nature, it won't go away if you ignore it.

    --
    All true wisdom can be found in sigs.
  107. 2 suggestions: by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

    Paintball or airsoft is better for outdoors than lasers. Lasers are kinda gay. Projectiles are sooo much more fun. They are also expensive and require more care than cheap plastic laser guns. You get what you pay for. Make weapons using PVC pipes wrapped with insulation and duct tape. If you get bored with shooting at your enemies, try beating them with a large, blunt object. You can make short swords, long swords, two handed swords, rapiers, pikes, poles, pole-axes...

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
  108. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by still+cynical · · Score: 1

    Got news for you, wrestling is a sport, not a way to defend yourself. Physical conditioning aside, a wrestler is at a great disadvantage against a martial artist whose skills include grappling. The Gracies are not wrestlers, they are martial artists, practicing a form of jiu-jitsu that they have developed. Look at your old videotapes that shows one of the Gracies against the 300lb wrestler. The guy was easily twice his size, yet Gracie (Royce?) (sp?) forced him to submit.

    Practical martial arts are the way to go to teach people young and old self-defense, discipline, confidence, and courtesy, if taught correctly. Note I said "practical". If you're kicking at your opponent's head, spinning around, or hoping to God you don't end up grappling, it is NOT practical. Nothing wrong with sport-oriented Tae Kwon Do, just don't expect to do well in a bar fight.

    In fact, no martial arts style is the be-all and end-all of fighting skills. Study several. Learn each well, and then move on to a totally different style while still developing your skills in the earlier style and bringing what you learned to your new style. Study Kenpo, jiu-jitsu, Okinawan karate, Aikido, Kali, etc. Learn from them all and remember that they are all right for what they teach (when taught properly), and that they are ALL wrong for what they do not teach.

    --
    Ignorance is the root of all evil.
  109. It is possible to avoid violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 22 years old, male, went to public school and have never been in a fight. I've never been beaten up, mugged, attacked, or attacked anyone else. Ever. The closest I got was play-fighting as a kid, and that was never with the intent to actually hurt anyone. I don't know any martial arts (except for some basics with a Katana), I've never held a real gun let along fired one.

    'Course I *do* live in Canada...

  110. Green Lasers by torklugnutz · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at and yearning for one of those fancy green lasers at think geek.
    http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/tools/5a47 /
    Maybe this is finally something that would be useful for the device. I'm sure the laser could trip the photo cells on the lasertag gear. Just strap them to the sides of your guns and set up some sort of circuit to interface with the trigger. That way, it would be more realistic. You'd give up your location when you fired. It'd look cool as hell too.

    --
    Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
  111. MORE POWER!!! by jht · · Score: 1

    That's the obvious mod - enough juice to put a serious hole in something would be a really cool mod to make. We're talking "Tool Time"-caliber power.

    Of course, it's not terribly practical, but if practicality was the point then you wouldn't be playing games like laser tag in the first place, anyway.

    So just amp the suckers up and go for some serious pain. Or at least give DARPA some ideas. Bwah-ha-ha!

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  112. kaboom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    take a regular old remote control with you. it's really short range, but it'll most likely get everyone in a really wide radius, including yourself if you're not careful.

  113. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

    I think we can all agree on this: As with everything in life, one should experience/practice/eat/whatever many things in moderation. Some competitive, and possibly violent sport such as paintballing, or sportshooting in MODERATION can be very healthy, and a great learning experience. At the same time, other activities to even-out the violent activities, such as painting or cooking, when also practiced in moderation will yield a very rich learning experience, and probably a well-balanced life/mental health/ability to defend ones self in more ways than one.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  114. Unrealistic by nature.. But you can mod it... by moorley · · Score: 1

    Laser Tag is unrealistic by nature. It's a real world attempt to approximate a form of combat that only exists in fiction, IMHO.

    Do you want "realistic" Star Wars or "realistic" Star Trek? Or better yet, PHOTON... Cough... hack....

    Ok. That's not going to work but you can take the premise of laser tag and play with it. Ideas below (feasibility will vary):

    Remember "Laser Tag" was meant to be just that. Tag. Our imaginations automatically take the guns and vests somewhere they may not be able to go.

    Add in scenarios like "Capture the Flag" or "Hold Hill 529". Or better yet a grenade like gadget that will exploded if handled for more than x number of seconds or minutes. A weird form of "Hot Potato".

    Modify the gear for team play. Different sensors can disable the entire teams in different ways. Add in a randomizer so you can have a "Critical Hit". You'll have to continually experiment but it could be fun.

    If you add in the scenarios or campaigns with hardware that doesn't "die" but renders an inactive penalty for being scored a hit that can make for a funner game. Or reacts in either ways, lights up their vest making them an easier target.

    You could even have a multitude of "gear" and reactions. A RadioFrequency gadget that may make vests "sing out" like a sonar ping, or a remote control gadget that allows you to trigger someone's gun or grenade.

    Rather than one team versus another team, you could have multiple teams with different scenarios or goals intermixing.

    I always thought it would be fun to add in robotics or a "remote" component. Automated defenses or some players that remotely control certain defenses. Maybe some more advanced or hardier embedded or fixed weaponry. Or a series of trips and traps that can placed, moved, and or modified.

    The cool thing is if you work on the gear it's reusable, and tweakable. That could add some fun to the game but it could also kill it. Some folks can't handle having a game where the rules can be tweaked. For those regulation tennis may be more suited to them.

    Technology can be something to play with. If you've got the folks who want to play. If Society for Creative Anachronisms can go at each other with swords and armor, why not this?

    Have Fun!

    --
    "Don't fear death... fear not living..." -me :)
  115. Optics by James+Turpin · · Score: 1
    Measure the beam width at immediately after leaving the gun. Go to your friendly local neighborhood (American) football field and measure the beam width at 100 yards (or meters). Calculate the angular diffraction.

    Compare this to the minimum angular diffraction for the laser diameter and wavelength. Then choose a lense that minimizes the angular diffraction. Alternatively, choose a lense size that minimizes the laser dot size at some particular distance. The two methods shouldn't be practically different at these scales.

    Unfortunately I don't have easy access to my textbooks at the moment, but if you want help on the math and physics you can send me a message.

    --
    Mathematics is not a crime.
  116. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by still+cynical · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Sad to say, but you are raising your children to be victims.
    our children will have to live with not being able to fight back unless absolutely necessary
    My children will learn never to fight back unless "absolutely necessary", but they will be preapared to do so if they have to. Refusing to let your children learn to defend themselves ensures that they will be UNABLE to defend themselves when it IS necessary.

    Violence is to be avoided. My children will be taught to walk away if possible. They will be taught to RUN away if walking away is not possible. And if running away is not possible then I feel sorry for the bully that picks on them. Provided they are well-adjusted members of society, the people best prepared to deal with violent situations are the LEAST likely to find themselves in one.
    --
    Ignorance is the root of all evil.
  117. friggin' lasers by austad · · Score: 1

    I saw a 140W water-cooled CO2 laser that sold on ebay for just over $300. If you could manage to make that portable, it would be about as realistic as it gets.

    And, even better, it gives you real incentive to avoid getting shot.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  118. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by greenegg77 · · Score: 1

    begin-soapbox

    I've got two kids, and I'm teaching them gun safety, how to fight (including how to seriously disable your opponent), and how to handle a knife (as a tool). Not because I want them to become violent, sadistic, megalomaniacs, but because I want them to know what will kill someone. That way they know what _not_ to do.
    They already know that you never, ever, point a gun at someone unless you are going to kill them. We don't even tell them that shooting someone can wound them (they get enough of that from the movies).
    There is a balnce that needs to be maintained, teaching the kids responsibility for their actions, and making them understand that the repurcussions for their actions can be, in kid's-speak, "really, really, bad."
    To not teach them anything would be a greater evil. If they are just taught to loathe and fear any weapon, they will either a) loathe even legitimate uses of that tool, b) rebel against their parents and cause greater damage than if they had proper respect of the tool, or c) when inadvertantly exposed to such an item, they will not recognize it for what it is, and, in the great tradition of non-reposibility, shoot their friend and try to sue the manufacturer for their incompetence.

    end-soapbox

    --
    --- This .sig for sale - $500 OBO.
  119. two points no to paint and more info. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    First of all I see a lot of people talking about paintball. They are different games, off topic from his request. Yes, some sadistic people enjoy hurting their opponent and don't care about being hit by a mere lazer. But some people are win motivated and do care about their scores, more than a minute amount of pain that you whiny paint ball fans are so motivated to avoid.

    More importantly, Lazer tag usually is a dual system: a red light beam used SOLELY for sighting purporses, and a radio wave that goes through things like your shirt, etc. to hit the sensor. even if you try and cheat.

    Mirrors bounce the light beam but at most will block the radio wave, not bounce it off of you.

    For simple ways to increase your lazer tag fun, you can try the following. 1) Turn up the volume. Make the vest SCREAM in pain when you are hit. 2) Get more sensors. Shoulders, chest and back are fine, but how about a head shot for extra points. 3) Go for mines, as disccussed earlier.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  120. Use TV Remote by SirLanse · · Score: 1

    I had a programable TV remote that we set to the laser tag freq. It worked like a shotgun. It did not have much range, but it could hit several targets all at once!!

  121. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by shmokey · · Score: 1

    I only referenced the Gracies as far as chokes and locks, not as am. wrestlers. And besides I dont know jack shit about any "martial arts". I do know that I've been in dozens of fights and hardly ever hit someone, it hurts my hand far too much. I've also been hit some and it hurts very much as well. So I try to avoid it. People freak when you've got their air cut off and you are laying on top of them though. I just wish people would fight one on one nowadays. It's always gotta be a group jumping somone else, or someone getting shot.

    --
    http://samtron.cjb.net
  122. Because that's why he was killed by JLavezzo · · Score: 1

    There are enough police who rely on "racial profiling" that it's worth mentioning. Which is to say, it's implied by including the skin tone of the victim that if the it had been a white kid, the law enforcement officer in question wouldn't have been so quick to shoot to kill.

    1. Re:Because that's why he was killed by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

      Maybe they wouldn't be... I'm having trouble finding the reference, but I remember reading a study a few years ago where they tested people's reactions to unfamiliar people. There was greater fear and anxiety (as gauged by blood pressure and pulse rate) when a black person walked into a room as opposed to a caucasian. Now the odd part of the result is that everyone had this increased reaction, including the black people being tested. *sigh* I really wish I could find a cite of the study... my google skills seem inadequate.

      --
      This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  123. Diffraction grating by spludge · · Score: 1

    Put a diffraction grating on the front of your gun, instant spread fire gun :)

  124. You can't enforce an n-hit kill rule in paintball. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With a sophisticated laser tag system, you get real time stats, game rules enforced by the equipment itself, etc. etc.

    Paintball _is_ fun, but it's a different type of gameplay.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  125. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by BK425 · · Score: 1

    Children naturally misunderstand power. They see television, or just other kids running around shouting bang and, if sheilded from the responsibility surrounding power, think that's something they can apply to help themeselves feel better. Then, parents hide tools that are (improperly but widely) associated with power from their children and the children naturally become curious about it (Sex, guns, etc). It is a recipe for the worst kind of disaster. Hiding things from children is never a realistic option.

    Also, kids need to become responsible as early as they're capable of it because that is the nature of life. Since Mogg met Og parents have wanted their kids to continue a carefree childlike existence that... never existed. If Og took a second to think back on middle school, and ask himself if he was surrounded by happy peppy people all of the time or if a few of the people in his life were sometimes troubled he'd be moving in the direction of waking up. People come in all shapes and sizes, try to help your children deal with that as early as you can. Some of us think that helping them understand self defense (and whatever tools relevent to self defense the parent finds appropriate) is a Good Thing(tm).

  126. Look into MILES, the military system by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The military has a more realistic system called MILES, which they use for war games. It works much like laser tag, but their rules are tougher.
    • MILES uses real weapons with blank rounds. The MILES laser transmitter clamps into the barrel, so if you do manage to load a live round, you destroy the transmitter and the weapon, but not your target. The "bang" of the blank round triggers the laser transmitter. So you have to lug ammo and magazines around. All the real-world problems of jams and misfires occur, too.
    • If you're hit, it beeps. Loudly. Continously. And you can't turn it off. Only a referee can turn it off.
    • If you're hit, you're dead. You're carried off to the "dead" pen. Often, becoming "dead" means an extra 20-mile march or some similar unpleasant detail.
    • In the newer versions, beams are coded, and you can tell who hit whom. Soldiers who miss too much get sent to the rifle range for extra training.
    • Scores affect your real-life Army career. Why send losers to war?
    The latest generation gear uses GPS and data links so that indirect fire weapons can be simulated. But you probably don't need that.
    1. Re:Look into MILES, the military system by andersa · · Score: 1

      It's a clever system. The Danish International Brigade trains units that are sent to Bosnia and Iraq with this. Never got to try it myself though. (And it was a long time ago I saw it..)

      One thing. If you get hit, it beeps, until you lie completely still on the ground, then it stops.

      The problem with most laser tag systems I think is the daylight. It will likely screw up the receptors resulting in very poor range. This profesional system solves this with special ir filters on the diodes, giving effective ranges hundreds of meters.

      I think it would be very difficult technically to mod any of the cheap laser tag systems to compete with this.

    2. Re:Look into MILES, the military system by TheABomb · · Score: 1
      Scores affect your real-life Army career. Why send losers to war?

      So what you're saying is if you're lucky enough to avoid getting shot with fake rounds, you get to go off to another country and get shot with real ammo? Sounds like a very well thought-out system they got there.

      (For the record, I am aware that the grunts who "win" are the ones supposedly good at avoiding being shot.)

      --
      MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
  127. 1996 Site Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Established October 1996 - 7+ Years on the Internet

    And im sure their site looks EXACTLY like it did back in 1996. You would think they could make a nicer, more modern looking site in 7+ years!!!

  128. Military surplus? by harborpirate · · Score: 1

    I used to know a guy in the National Guard, and he said every so often they would run excersises where two "teams" were formed with opposing objectives.

    They use real guns modified with a laser in the barrel and use blanks in the exercise to add realism.

    I did a little google research, the system is called MILES (Military Laser Tag).

    A little bit of info about the marines using it is available here:
    http://www.dcmilitary.com/marines/henderson hall/9_ 11/features/28041-1.html

    Also, it looks like the military may replace this system with an RF based system:
    http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/ar ticle.cfm ?Id=763

    So, maybe there will be some surplus MILES gear on the market at some point - if so I would imagine it would be exactly what you're looking for.

    There are, of course, a couple possible problems. Even surplus MILES gear is probably going to be damn expensive. Also, the removal of the laser system could result in an operable weapon. If the last part is correct, then you won't see any MILES gear unless you find it on the black market.

    --
    // harborpirate
    // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
  129. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    Will your kids be born because you fixed some hooker's motherboard?

    Hey, maybe my kids and your kids can get together and play, and my kids can beat up your kids! Wouldnt that be fun!?

    I'll tell ya what, you teach your kids all that, I'll teach my kids skills that don't involve violence. Then, your kids can come over and wash my kids cars for some pocket change, ok?

  130. Military Laser Tag Equipment Gone Berzerk!!!!. by burdicda · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the Air Force we where using "MILES" gear
    a commercial industrial strength laser tag, and
    after some rather rugged encounters...dropped
    weapons, banging around...etc

    The strength of the beams got out of hand and
    when shot with them, the intensity was such as to
    create quarter sized bruises .. just like paintball
    but with infrared spectrum light beams you can't see. Good way to lose an eye and the range was
    way beyond any paint gun.....hehehe

    1. Re:Military Laser Tag Equipment Gone Berzerk!!!!. by Phanatic1a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I call 'bullshit.' How would banging the emitters around result in a dramatic power increase? That's just silly.

    2. Re:Military Laser Tag Equipment Gone Berzerk!!!!. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said Air Force, so we know he's BS'ing about doing anything with firearms. The USAF doesn't have ground troops to train. :)

    3. Re:Military Laser Tag Equipment Gone Berzerk!!!!. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prev comment is right, you're full of crap (burns maybe, but bruises?).

      Nevertheless MILES is cool stuff. It's got multimile range for various weapons. Plus, MILES is part of a complete training system, so if a pilot wants to do no-bomb drop scoring (or even just fly a simulator over the real troops), we can 'kill' ground troops according to what would have actually happened and their MILES will alarm to let them know they've died. Heck, the pilot could be flying in Montana, while the troops are in the Florida and the system can tie them together. Very cool.

    4. Re:Military Laser Tag Equipment Gone Berzerk!!!!. by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      It's simple enough. Since Reagans Star Wars program, the military has been using powered down lightsabers (a star wars spin-off technology) with an extended length modulation for laser tag gear. Unfortunately, the "power down" feature is in reality a highly fragile beam filtering device which, when abused by rough handling, ceases to operate.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    5. Re:Military Laser Tag Equipment Gone Berzerk!!!!. by kesuki · · Score: 1

      it's a bit farfetched, but say the emmiters were emmitting a beam much wider than that of a quarter, say a swath more the size of a whole person, for instance, and banging them around caused an alignment problem that caused not thier power to increase but the focal area on the beam to decrease, causing an exponential increase in the energy level of the impact area of the lazer.
      I'm not familiar with the specification enough to determine if this is possible, nor am i quite certion of the actual power intensity the original beam would have have to have been, to create 'bruises' when being fired at a fraction of the original target area.

  131. Replace the emitter and reciever by Tommy+Boomfiger · · Score: 1

    How about replacing the the LED emitters with actual laser diodes and replacing the IR recievers with ones that will detect the laser beam. There is one problem with this, the beam will probably now be too narrow. The only thing I can think of is to replace the sensors with ones that have a much larger surface area or install a lens that will refract the beam into the sensor. Im not really familiar with the hardware so I dont know how big the sensors are to begin with.

    --
    ~Tommy Boomfiger http://www.gotapex.com/forums
    1. Re:Replace the emitter and reciever by thepr0fess0r · · Score: 1

      Thats what I was going to suggest (damn proxy at work is BLOCKED from slashdot :/) You could hijack a dime store laser pointer for the gun, and use a lens to increase the beam width. Then replace the infrared phototransciever with an ordinary photodetector, and blank it out with a cheap red gel. Those laser challenge thingies are pretty crappy, I've never understood why they don't just use real lasers... it's nothing but a damn IR diode and a lens to increase the beam width. good luck!

  132. You're missing the point. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    1) I don't know about you, but I rarely feel paintballs through my clothes (I have to constantly check myself when I'm under fire).

    Pain is not something I would associate with paintball. I mostly associate paint getting everywhere and trash bags to contain it.

    2) The POINT is that what these guys are REALLY looking for is a developer's kit for the "commercial" laser tag systems. I guarantee you could have a real fun time with that if you're a little technically inclined.
    You could make the system portable and lug it into a gynasium or the woods or where-ever.
    Some of the more sophisticated systems have fully programmable vests and guns with a LCD display which link via RF to a central server... you can pick firing modes, simulate area attacks, count ammo, track hits on different sensors, stream audio, etc. etc. And if that isn't enough, and you need the pain motivation, they make packs that vibrate, and yes, even shock you. (Usually the shock is a feature that surfaces due to a broken vibrator motor but I digress.)
    Can you imagine the cool shit you could do with that and a developers kit? You could play Halo outside, complete with in-game chat.

    Your friends are playing dumbass laser tag designed for the spawn of Soccer Moms. And no one who plays laser tag competetively plays with only a STUN penalty for getting hit. You get hit, lose points, get hit enough, you're out.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:You're missing the point. by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      Perhaps the penalty for getting hit is to go to the regen point to reset your equipment, like a typical first person shooter. Then the incentive is not to have to travel to point A, wasting time en route, when you could be playing laser tag.

      Perhaps each team's base could offer a reset key.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    2. Re:You're missing the point. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      The Army already has done the legwork on this. They call it the "MILES" system. Several sensors on your body detect Laser fire from an enemy rifle, and communicates via a CMDA network with a central facility. CMDA is also used in many US digital phones. With a little tinkering you could probably design one yourself with a phone prototyping kit and a surplus cell tower.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  133. Remote Controls... by fost0127 · · Score: 1

    My first two years of college we played with the knock-off Laser Tag gear. We found that IR Remotes triggered the sensors. For what its worth they don't like it when you play in a university building. Even if its an EE building. Ah well, we moved on to steam tunnel exploration.

    1. Re:Remote Controls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah well, we moved on to steam tunnel exploration.

      No good! It's full of steam!

  134. In other Obvious News by captapathy · · Score: 1

    Weilding a gun in public is also not a good idea.

    1. Re:In other Obvious News by magefile · · Score: 1

      (wielding a gun in public) is a subset of (wielding things that appear to be guns). I.e. (wielding things that appear to be guns (that are) + (that aren't)) == (wielding things that appear to be guns)

  135. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put them in Karate. It's non-violent and actually teaches you to AVOID fights like the plague but, if they're ever attacked they will be able to defend themselves. The bonus is it's great exercise and builds confidence. Head in the sand upbringings will only lead to disaster.

  136. Don't Be A Wuss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont be a wuss, get a paintball gun instead. Much funner, and more realistic too.

  137. fiberless fiber optic radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there already such a thing as a line-of sight fiberless fiber optic radio? That's what I've always thought would be cool.

    --digitalartform.com

  138. TV/VCR Remotes by fost0127 · · Score: 1

    Infra-Red remotes triggered our Laser-Tag knock-off sensors. After getting kicked out of the EE building on campus we moved on to steam tunnel exploration.

  139. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the input. I was in Tae Kwan Do for some time, but left because the owner was a d***. Never went back. I have no experience with Karate, so it's nice to hear someone who knows recommending it.

    Someday I may own a gun, at which point I would definitely teach my children about it, and possibly how to use it (depending on their age) effectively. I'm actually a qualified "expert" marksman (at least with a .22).

    My point was not that I was not going to teach my children about violence, or not teach them about the tools of violence, I just don't feel it's appropriate for them to view these things as toys, i.e. something to play with.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
  140. I think what people are trying to say is..... by TigerTime · · Score: 1

    Though the question was 'how can I make laser tag more realistic'. The answer of paintball is almost a legitamate solution, but doesn't answer the actual question posed

    I think what people are trying to say is: Make it more dangerous. Improve the "laser" to the point where it can do damage. Coming back from a game where your opponent looks like he has chicken pox from all the burn marks would make it a little more fun.

  141. Eye protection and lasers by zyche · · Score: 1
    I don't know if an invisible laser is a good combination with a toy... Considering that all laser products are considered somewhat dangerous to your eyesight.

    Are you to wear special safety googles while playing? How do you avoid looking at a faulty gun where the trigger has stucked?

  142. Dudes... good places already have this. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Good equipment has multiple vibration feedback, loud audio alarms, etc. etc. Also, you're looking for a place that offers multiple styles of gameplay (elimination, predator/prey, team play with 'respawn' area, etc.)

    As to the hand block shenanigans... the really good equipment uses a type of narrow band IR that is transparent to flesh, or they have really large sensor areas (or multiple sensor areas) that are difficult to cover with limbs. Moreover, the guns are usually two-hands-required-to-fire, so if they're being retarded and trying to block, you're shooting them on the other exposed sensors and they're not returning fire.

    My big issue is with people who "dance" in an attempt to keep you from hitting their sensors. God, do they people realize they look like handicapped children at a Yanni concert?

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  143. Step up to complete disregard for human safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back many years ago we made our own version of laser tag - CAR laser tag. Best played at night - We took 5 sensors and mounted them to a board which we placed in the back window of the "it" car. Reasonable boundaries in the city were set, and the car that was "it" got a 2 minute head start. The remaining "chaser" cars (often with 3-4 laser gun wielding idiots each) would then attempt to find and chase down the "it" car until all of the sensors had been shot. Then it would move to the next car etc. Winning car was the one that managed to be "it" the longest. Needless to say, this resulted in many Rockford-esque moves, insane speeds through back alleys, power slides and every other traffic violation you can think of. Now that I think about it, I hope I never have kids.

  144. Re: Do you get what Paint Ball is about? by andersa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have played both Laser Tag (Q-zar) and Paintball and I enjoy both, but I don't think you can simply compare the two on the basis of what incentive there is not to get hit.

    The variety of gameplay possibilities the realtime scoring and rules management system in laser tag games offer, make the experience completely different from Paint Ball.

    If you want an incentive not to get hit in laser tag, then I suggest a game of Q-Zar Eliminator. When you get tagged, you loose one of your preset amount of "lives", and when you have lost all of them you are simply out of the game. You loose. You can steal lives from other players if you shoot accurately enough, a game rule which would be completely unenforcable in Paint Ball. You have to watch your ass, if the arena is well designed and set with the right ambient sounds and lighting, this can be a truely nerve wrecking experience. I have never experienced the same amount of suspence in any game of Paint Ball I have played.

    If the reason you prefer Paint Ball is that it hurts when you get hit (which supposedly would give you an incentive not to get hit), then I must question your understanding of the game.

    Paint Ball is NOT about not getting hit. Paint Ball is about winning the game. To win the game you sometimes have to make sacrifices and take casualties. Get the flag and take it to the goal. If one of your team survives and accomplishes this, the victory is yours. Paint Ball is not a war simulation. I have seen plenty of trained military personel get their asses thouroughly spanked by more sports oriented teams, because they don't understand that it isn't a problem if you take a couple of casualties on you way to the goal. In Paint Ball pain is temporary, honor is forever, and there are no points for second place.

  145. IR, not radio. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1
    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:IR, not radio. by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Actually, since infrared equipment requires the target to wear sensors, to 'detect' hits, some so-called lazer tag systems do actually use radio frequency, and just have visible lasers to make you think you're scoring hits with the laser.
      an easy way to tell if you're using a real lazer tag system is if it requires either reflective clothing (a reflective sensor system) or else specialized IR detectors, which can calculate the hit through an infrared beam, but not actually a laser, since scoring a hit would be virtually impossible unless you covered every inch of a persons bosy with infrared detectors :)
      Ironically the only 'real' laser in laser tag is the sighting beam, as the rest are really more like an infrared tranmitter the likes found in your tv remote sending a wide enough path of infrared for a limited set of dectors to sense a 'hit'

  146. Just stumbled across this by Sagz · · Score: 1

    Looks interesting.

    http://lightbrain.8m.com/mtdesign.htm

  147. Crab apple fights? by swb · · Score: 1

    We used to have a few trees in the neighborhood that produced shitloads of crab apples (that's what WE called them; they could have been any kind of apple). About mid-August there were enough apples to fill 2-3 Radio Flyer wagons full.

    We filled 'em up, made teams and some ad-hoc defenses and had at it throwing apples at each other. A strong 13 year old can throw an apple hard enough that it hurts at close distance (across a residential street), and invariably at least one kid (usually the one who cried the most) got one right in the mouth, and usually one that had gotten kinda mashed and full of sand or something.

    Ideally the apples could be picked up and used for several fights, although advent of the yellow jacket season usually put a limit on handling of half-rotten apples.

  148. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

    You won't have kids. Untill you get an atitude correction. Probably from the guy washing your car who's fed up with your arrogance.

    A) You making more money that a Peace Corp worker, doesn't make you better. Nor does it make you better than the guy washing your car.

    B) Teaching your children things other than being liberal does not make them stupid. One has nothing to do with the other.

    C) Learning Martial arts is about self disaplin not violence. Something children, and most adults these days could do with a fair dose of.

  149. Modding the Vests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually have quite a bit of experience in this area... a rarity when it comes to /. topics. ; )

    One thing that really makes laser tag much more fun and realistic requires quite a bit of hardware work, but the results will be well worth your while. It's possible to remove the sensors from the vests and wire them into an ordinary gym headband... I can't describe how to do this in specific detail without drawing diagrams and actually demonstrating, but hey, if my friends and I did it (and we have little to no experience with electronics), how hard can it be?

    The effect on gameplay is astounding. It's much more realistic and fun for everyone if the area to cover is the head rather than the chest. This way, if you want to cover, you can't just crouch down behind, say, a low wall or a tree stump... you would actually have to hide your head in order to avoid being hit. My friends and I had a rule in which you couldn't fire unless your vest was showing, so as to prevent you from just covering your vest and such... this prevents that, because if you're covering your head (say, standing behind a tree) you're not going to be able to fire well anyways, due to the obstruction of vision.

    The main problem is that creating the headbands is time-consuming, and can be expensive if you want a sensor in the back of the headband as well, since you would need 2 packs for each. (we tried using sensors bought from Radio Shack but they had a range of less than 10 feet) But if you're actually looking for better ways to play laser tag and not paintball, i would definately say go for it.

  150. Build your own gear by Psyrg · · Score: 1

    One of the interesting things about laser strike is that the gun produces the IR beam.

    What I wanted to do is cover the players with IR diodes and put the photodetector on the rifle itself. This way, you could use an expensive sensor in the weapon for accuracy, and cover the player in inexpensive emitters. This will of course disallow the use of night vision goggles.

    Each diode on the target player will flash in a combination or sequence that allows the system to determine where the target was shot. This would incur penalties such as leg shots, or weapon failure. A blood loss system could be used to determine when the player is no longer able to stand or fight due to the calculated loss. This would be managed by a server of some description, with data exchange over radio link, be it tones over an AM link or WiFi.

    Finally, it would be fun to add a gas flash burner to the gun to make it crack when it fires. Night time laser strike would never be the same. Just no point blank shots though. :)

  151. BS. by raehl · · Score: 1

    Paintballs travel at 300 feet per second. At 50 feet, that gives you 166 ms to see the paintball, determine where the paintball is going, and get out of the way.

    Which doesn't happen. It's a little more realistic at 100 feet, and fairly easy to do at 150 - but again, this assumes that you happen to be looking at the person shooting when the paintball is fired, which in most cases is not true.

    As for military types, I'm guessing you havn't played in at least 10 years, or you hang around with a lot of wierdo survivalist types. Go to any commercial field, and the vast majority of the players will be 10->18 years old, some with parents. The demographic is pretty much the same as the amusement park crowd, with less girls (as is true with most athletics, unfortunately.)

    1. Re:BS. by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to adjust your time-of-flight numbers upward to account for aerodynamic slowing. A (relatively) large, lightweight projectile will decelerate significantly once it has left the muzzle. I don't know the max range of a typical paintball gun, so I can't take a stab at the math.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
  152. More IR sensors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest problem I have with laser tag is that I've seen too many kids cheat by simply convering up the IR detectors. The best mod would be to make the entire surface of you and your gun a detector, so you couldn't block it. Then narrowing the beam might have some meaning. Oh, and actually being able to hear the device over the noise in the arena might help too -- I was never quite sure what it was trying to tell me.

  153. You missed the biggest difference... by raehl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rifles *RIFLE* the round - it's the angular momentum of the round that delivers the majority of the long-range accuracy. With Airsoft (or paintball, for that matter), you're dealing with a basically spherical projectile, which is not rifled.

    1. Re:You missed the biggest difference... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      That actually doesn't matter in this case. When you look at the velocity of the Airsoft rounds, you realise that they just won't cut it to reach those distances. I mean I suppose the higher speed ones could if you shot the gun like a howitzer, but then aiming is right out. Also the round is quite light, and thus more sucpetable to friction and air currents.

      Even if you did use a pointed round and a barrel with riflings, it wouldn't matter, the gun and ammo still lack the requisite speed and mass to accurately travel 300m. Even with fast 100m/s guns are totally insufficient. The round drops 9.8m/s^2 so it will smash into the ground long before it gets even half way there. Even shooting at a high angle I'm not sure you could do it (and don't care to run the numbers to find out if you could).

    2. Re:You missed the biggest difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See here:
      http://www.xringairsoft.com/tech/6mm.shtml
      (trim space if necc.)
      for why airsoft barrels aren't rifled. It's basically to do with "HopUp", which is an adjustable rubber edge that sits in the upper part of the chamber the start (projectile end) of the barrel. This imparts "upward" spin, counteracting gravity and causing the pellet to travel further. Rifling would mean you couldn't do this, and while might result in slightly greater accuracy, the pellets aren't manufactured to high enough tolerances for it to be worth it.

  154. Paintball... Lasertag by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    Stop arguing which is better and accept there diferent, in paintball it's a case of when youre shot you act like youve been shot (not to hard given the pain if you got shot on a soft spot), with laster tag, you run back to a recharge point and contine.

    It's like arging betwen Counterstrike and Team Fortress, diferent games for diferent people.

    But yes I would like to see laser-tag improved:

    To reduce the beam-size you must increaase the density of sensors on the body, ideally going onto sensors which are like EL-string and forming a whole sensor 'net' around the body, to eliminate intentional beam spread you'd want the target area to be the same size as the barrel, so you'd be talking a net with about a 1/2 inch spacing, that's not cheep.

    Other improvements, get rid of the reality nuts and send them paintballing so we can turn the arenas into safer more adventuous places :)

  155. lLT arms races by v1 · · Score: 1

    We had quite the arms-race going among our laser tag group some oh... ten or more years ago. The main fray was between me and another electronics-savvy kid named Dave. I made decoys (flashing lights, to mimic the hats, for night time play) and also took the three broad emitters from my (useless) starbase and implanted them in my pistol. (a la "the grenade") The pistol was then a fearful object... anything within 20 feet in a generouls 150 degree cone would take a hit. Excellent for when being chased - just point behind you and pull trigger while running. Of course anything beyond 20 feet was safe from the effects. Had to be careful around walls though - it was quite possible to hit onesself (via reflection) when shooting at a target that was standing by a wall. I called that a "ricochet".

    Dave's weapon of choice was a true grenade.. a small ball with about ten IR leds on it, and a long run of wire to a jack that plugged into his rifle. He'd chuck the grenade (like up onto a building roof where I was standing...) and fire the rifle. The grenade would then most likely start delivering hits to anyone nearby. Thank god for helmets - those babies were hard to hit from below, though they rendered you basically deaf when you were wearing one.

    All of our tech was based on the guns, since at the time we weren't capable of reproducing the low frequency pulsing that the LT targets required. (it was right about 2khz iirc) The frequency was very high tolerance at least for us back then, I'd guess now at about +/- 10 Hz. Oh, I also added a "reset" button to my rifle. It cut power to the batteries when pressed. Useful in theory for if the gun "locked up" which they sometimes did when running around with them, but in practice more useful to avoid that nasty "cool down delay" after firing for ~20 sec straight. Just tap the reset after it went into cool down, and it was ready to fire another 20 seconds. :-)

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  156. Re:gnu-tag looks dead by andersa · · Score: 1

    Maybe www.dark-tag.com is a better option?

  157. Wearing blinking LEDS by zgornz · · Score: 1

    not only will this make it easier to be seen (hence more skill in hiding) but it will also prevent outsiders from mistaking you for doing something bad. Last night I heard a dog barking and saw out my window someone wearing mostly black clearly hiding in the alcove of a garage door. My first reaction was not oh some kids playing laser tag, but hrmm what is he up to? And I looked out the window trying to both be seen by him and figure out what he was doing, After I realized they were just playing laser tag I wasn't concerned, but if I had poor eyesight and was more paranoid I could called the cops on them. If the owner of the garage saw them for example, she might have thought they were tagging, and called the cops.

  158. Three Words: Strip Laser Tag by mixmasterjake · · Score: 1

    preferably with some girls involved.

    --
    TODO: come up with a clever sig
  159. No no no never paintball. Never again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first (and only) time I tried paintball, it was with a few co-workers at BFG Paintball in Milwaukee. Grime-covered place, kept playing the same 3 songs from The Matrix soundtrack the whole time we were there, and the floor was too slippery from months of uncleaned paint to provide any traction.

    Several of the players brought their own guns, and then dialed them up to the maximum velocity allowed by the range. They'd then crank the velocity up even higher when the ref wasn't looking.

    People were lying about when they got hit, and the folks that brought their own gear were most interested in raising welts on other players. I punched a guy in the visor after he went full-auto on me from ten feet away -- after I had already been shot. I was walking off the course (with my muzzle-sock on) when the asshole popped me.

    When the Spy vs. Spy game came up (end of the day, where one person on each team secretly works for the other side), the spy on our side snuck up behind people (me included), then shot us each in the back with the muzzle touching us. That welt bled. Took six weeks for it to heal fully.

    Moral? Never play paintball with people you don't know, and never play it with people who aren't 100% honest. Seems like there are very few honest people in paintball.

    Me, I'm never playing paintball again. The guns are amazingly inaccurate, and the players who play all the time have guns that spray full-auto paintballs everywhere. Takes the equality out of the game.

  160. Screw this kiddie krap by MrChuck · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Discussed this with a buddy who's an ex army "sharpshooter" (that's sniper if he's on the other side).

    My thought was to trigger a taser wired up under your shirt. His was bullets.

    Perhaps rubber bullets. (but the taser thing would work with video games).

    So you get hit, your in a big boatload of pain for a while and fall and thrash on the floor for a while. So what? You wanna "play war" little boys? Then stop pretending that's it's blood and pain free.

    Ok, forget lasers. Use rocks.

    This army recruitment crap of paintball/laser tag/video games is just sick. I'll take my bugs bunny and itchy and scratchy any day than the sanitized faux-violence on the TV and in these "games".

    Wanna play? Join the services. If you lose and you're lucky, you still might have 3 limbs and some of your hearing.

    1. Re:Screw this kiddie krap by Jouster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Paintball is not army recruitment, any more than Cops and Robbers is police recruitment, or holding your kid up in the air and playing "Airplane" is Air Force recruitment.

      Paintball is a game designed to elicit adrenalin rushes. Put a football linesman up against the opposing team, then send him onto a speedball (tournament paintball) field. It's the same feeling--you know you're going to get hit, but you're trying to avoid it, and even if you do get hit, you'll make the other guy pay for the right to hit you.

      Paintball has gotten a bad rap. Go out and play a game. I play at Skyline Paintball; I'll gladly loan you a tournament-class gun (er, sorry, political correctness setting in, "a tournament-class marker"). You'll very quickly see that anyone who plays paintball understands better than the average kid entering an Army recruiter's office that war is hell, and there are times of utter hopelessness in a battle when you have no hope of surviving and are simply awaiting the round that will seal your fate. If that's recruiting for the Army, they'd better come up with something better, quick.

      Jouster

    2. Re:Screw this kiddie krap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh.

      The whole fun of paintball is that its_not_real.

      Its not supposed to simulate real war you moron.

      Why would anyone pay to emulate losing a limb or their hearing?

      you fool.

    3. Re:Screw this kiddie krap by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 3, Funny

      Paintballings fun (a lot better than laser tag). However for your average player I don't think they'll play by tournement rules. I played laser tag once and the rush is just not the same. you get hit in laser tag you go beep now if you linked up an induction coil the beeper that might be more fun. However in paintballing (tournement syle) if you get hit for a start you're probably going to get a bruse then there's the thought of the other 3 or so balls that are going to hit you straight after the first. Ps if you shoot someone in the balls and the paintball doesn't break you can keep firing until they give up, however when they pick themselves of the ground they might come after you with a big stick (and never do this to a guy who is twice the size of you (I speak from experience)).

  161. OH SWEET JESUS, ANYTHING BUT M.I.L.E.S!! by propellerhead_prime · · Score: 4, Informative

    M.I.L.E.S. (Multiple Integrated Laser Engagment System, in case you were wondering) is horrible. It is awful. It is so atrocious that I can't truly capture its badness except to say that it sucks about as much as a black hole. Don't look into it. Don't consider it. Don't mention it...for gawdsake, don't even think about it.

    I have been in the Army for about eight years now and I honestly cannot sum up how much I hate this system. I once told myself, "Self, I think I could be happy doing anything as long as I don't have to wear M.I.L.E.S gear." Since I told myself that I have spent significant time in swamps, deserts and everywhere in-between and I can tell you as a bone fide user that I preferred being in a hostile combat environment where I was getting shot at over wearing that crap in training.

    Fortunately for you I find it very hard to believe that you would find any that works on the market, and if you did, the last thing your neighbors or police would want is you and your friends shooting real machine guns at each other with real (blank) ammo and then trying to explain that its just a game.

    Stick with Laser Tag...trust me on this one.

    1. Re:OH SWEET JESUS, ANYTHING BUT M.I.L.E.S!! by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Could you elaborate some more on what it is about MILES that makes it so crap?

      Is it unreliable? Breaks down a lot? Inaccurate? Curious minds would love to know :)

  162. You say viola, Spelling Troll says voila by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Viola: 1. A stringed instrument of the violin family, slightly larger than a violin, tuned a fifth lower, and having a deeper, more sonorous tone.

    Voila: Used to call attention to or express satisfaction with a thing shown or accomplished.

    1. Re:You say viola, Spelling Troll says voila by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Its also a popular female name.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  163. Parent post misses the point. by raehl · · Score: 1

    The thing that makes paintball "better" (really, different) is SENSORY FEEDBACK, a portion of which is the momentary pain if you get hit.

    I think part of the problem here is the parent poster seems more interested in proving how big of a man he is than seriously discussin the merits of the sport. Getting hit by a paintball, in normal circumstances (i.e. the guns being used have been properly chronographed and you're not in playing a seriously competetive tournament), hurts about as much as your little sister pinching you. It's annoying, but you quickly forget about it. I have seen plenty of birthday parties of 10-year-olds playing paintball and never seen any of them put off about getting shot. They do very much like shooting their parents, however.

    What makes paintball "better" is you can SEE when you hit someone. You can FEEL where you get hit. You can HEAR shots that whiz by your head. You can HEAR shots that hit objects near you. AIMing is much more precise activity. You can move anywhere in any manner, and you can score hits on any part of an opponent's person or equipment.

    Laser whatever is much more "ethereal". Everything about it is more "simulated" - you can't really see when you've hit someone, or tell where you've been hit or by who, or see or hear your or other people's shots, as they're just photons.

    Those reasons also make paintball much more fun to watch.

  164. Old system.... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    I remember at camp we played with this old laser tag system that was simply the best I've ever used, and never seen anything close to it in stores since, but I've forgotten the name.

    They were green guns, that you held with two hands. There were switches to have a wide, but short beam, or a narrow, but long beam. You could also set to single shot, semi auto, or auto I believe. There was an ammo counter as well, and if you slapped the bottom of the grip, it reloaded. The target was either the gun, or a sensor attached to a headband.

    It was easily the coolest setup I've ever used, very effective, and didn't look completely dorky, definitely for college age kids, and it had awesome range.

    Does anybody have any idea what the name of the system is, and where I might still be able to find one?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  165. Microcontrollers by Dan+East · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Technology has changed drastically since the 80's when I used to play Laser Tag, Photon, etc. These days you can buy fully programmable microcontrollers (Microchip PIC16F628A) for less than $2 a pop. I'm currently in the middle of a couple different IR projects with microcontrollers, so the potentials of this type of project are fresh in my mind.

    I would create the entire thing from scratch, as opposed to modding existing equipment. The circuit would be extremely simple (a PIC, a transistor, a few resistors, IR emitters and detectors, and push buttons for firing, reloading, resetting, etc).

    You could either just use IR LEDs, or get emitters that already modulate at some frequency. If you also encode data on your carrier then you could enable options like friendly fire, varying weapon damage, etc.

    Some ideas that come to mind:

    Use FM RF transmitters to relay all data back to a central data collection point to show game progress real-time.

    Use an IR transmitter modulated with a special code to reset each player. This would reduce cheating.

    Similar to above, use an IR transmitter (with a different code) that can be used to heal people. This unit could be placed in a fixed location, or you could have a medic type player that only has a weak weapon.

    Use virtual ammo, implemented as above. Once your weapon is out of ammo you have to pick up additional ammo, which recharges your weapon.

    Just like Medics in TFC, you could allow medics to infect enemy players. If a player is infected then they constantly emit a signal that would infect their teammates. Anyone infected will gradually loose health until they die. This could be implemented with a couple weak IR transmitters directly on the player. Of course medics on your own team can heal infections.

    Put a IR receiver in the weapon and not just on the player. Thus if it is possible to shoot at someone, it is possible to be shot. That has always been my biggest gripe about laser tag - people holding their gun around a corner where you can't see their sensor.

    I could go on and on, but I suppose that's enough rambling for now.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Microcontrollers by RAMGarden · · Score: 1

      Holy crap that is awesome. If you build this I would buy it. I could write all kinds of neat software for it. What about wearable computers and heads-up displays? This would make it easy to see your health, ammo, and arrows to show which side you were hit on (by signals from the IR receivers) just like any FPS game. It sounds like the augmented reality versions of Doom and the like that's out there.

      --
      --- Nothing is secure.
    2. Re:Microcontrollers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It has already been done.

      Check out milestag; open source (tho not entirely free) DIY lasertag system.

    3. Re:Microcontrollers by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Say, you could also throw in Claymores and other booby traps. Once set, when someone strays in front of a proximity sensor it sets of a "death strobe". An led mounted in a ping-pong ball could be a grenade, with a countdown timer. Maybe combine the two into an all-around booby-trap devices with multiple modes. Heck, why make the medic have a "weak" weapon. They can be any other player. You just don't want the other side finding out which one(s) on your side have the medpack device. If the medic is taken out, it would be an interesting battle for the survivors in the squad to attempt to recapture it. One item I'd like to add is different classes of weapons. Have a shotgun, a pistol, and a sniper rifle. Each has it's place in the battlefield. (Assuming that you have a wide open battlefield. One of my beefs with most Lasertag outfits is how cramped the fighting room is.) Sean Woods

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  166. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by pjpII · · Score: 1

    It would help if you had a clue what you were talking about. Extensive training with guns, knives, and "common items"? Do YOU know how to do this? Do you, despite being the inventor of "chi fist" even know which martial arts specialize in knife fighting and the relevant differences between them? Or do you simply intend to enroll them in your nonsense martial art?

    If you really want your kids to grow up knowing how to handle themselves reasonably, I recommend enrolling them in something other than Karate or Tae Kwon Do which have been recommended here. Young adults aren't going to be able to hit that hard - either enroll them in Escrima if you're seriously afraid for their safety so they can learn knife defense, or let them do something like Judo where their ability to hit won't influence the outcome of an encounter as much. And when they get older, enroll them at wrestling in school - I've seen seasoned wrestlers give black belts in Jujitsu a hard time.

    Teach your kids something useful, but know what you're doing first.

  167. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    C) Learning Martial arts is about self disaplin not violence.

    The original poster states this was a joke after he said it, but it betrayed his true intentions. The fact is, swimming or tennis or any sport can teach discipline. Martial arts has done a good job wrapping itself in Oriental mysticism, when Jet Li can utter some tripe about "to defeat your enemy, you must first know yourself." Fact is, it is interpersonal combat, in the same way boxing is. Boxing has a purer spirit, and it's place in American history especially is more pronounced. If i was going to teach my kid anything about combat, it would be to box. May not help him much in a street or bar fight, but that's what guns are for. Oh wait.... just kidding.

  168. Different games. by AME · · Score: 1
    There's no real incentive not to get shot, besides the lack of points.

    "If you would kindly ignore the incentive that I'm telling you about right now, then there's no real incentive to be a better laser tag player."

    --
    "I have a good idea why it's hard to verify programs. They're usually wrong." --Manuel Blum, FOCS 94
  169. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why Karate is perfect. Another bonus I didn't mention is that when it's time to go to University they can teach Karate and make a decent wage doing something they like instead of flipping burgers. If they turn out to be entrepeunerial they might even open up their own dojo and make a permanent career out of! One of my neighbours owns a dojo and they drive very nice cars and have a beautiful home so I figure it must be a good business!

  170. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Erm.. how about let them do as they wish within bondaries and if they wish to learn then teach them?

    Forcing anyone to learn anything does more harm then good. It's ridiclous to go "hey I want to teach you to shoot someone... oh who cares if you want to, pick up the gun and come with me to school". Forcing someone to do something is no different then your parents forcing you to live within a restricted world..

    --
    I like muppets.
  171. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by Frogbert · · Score: 1
    I do fully plan on teaching any/all kids I have as much about self-defense as I possibly can, and that will include extensive training with guns, knives, and "common items" which can be used as weapons in a pinch.

    So essentialy your training your kids to be your unholy ninja force of the night? Sir, I applaud you.
  172. Paintball? What a bunch of wussies. by Atario · · Score: 1


    Sodium Tag.
    1. Super Soaker water gun or equivalent
    2. One-ounce chunk of metalic sodium strapped to chest
    3. ???
    4. Hilarity!
    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  173. Paintball has it's own share of problems by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    I have played lasertag and paintball, both have their problems:

    Paitball:
    Paintball tends to be expensive compaired to lasertag.
    Paintball can cause minor injuries (yeah, I know, sissys not apply, but girls are less interested in getting all banged up that boy are.)
    People who 'bunker' in lasertag aren't a hazard to life and limb.
    Paintball is fun until you have some jerk show up in your casual game who has spent $2000 on gear. What's the point of that? It isn't really a big test of skill to use digial semi-automatic equipment to power paint the other team.
    Location: you have to pretty much play at a field, unless you have lots of friends to play with and your own 'back 40'.

    Lasertag:
    If it's really sunny out, just forget it.
    Covering sensors. On purpose or accident, it sucks trying to shoot someone with a covered sensor.
    Range. You have none. Laser tag is great for simulating handgun battles, though.
    Corrective fire. You can't really see what you are hitting. Aim VERY carefully.
    Batteries. Not as pricy as paintballs, but you will go through them like crazy.
    Popularity. Paintball is way more popular, or at least more organized.


    Both can be fun, though.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Paintball has it's own share of problems by billn · · Score: 1

      If it's really sunny out, just forget it.

      That's one thing I like about the business laser tag aspects. Indoor arenas, play in any weather.

      Covering sensors. On purpose or accident, it sucks trying to shoot someone with a covered sensor.

      I've been pimping LQ pretty hard in a couple of other posts, and this is one reason. LQ packs have 5 sets of sensors, where Qzar has two (the one down the barrel of the gun is so hard to hit as to not count). It's hard to cover all them at once, especially since there's one on each shoulder.

      Range. You have none. Laser tag is great for simulating handgun battles, though.

      I'm gonna disagree on this one. LQ arenas are 8,000 square feet, plus, varying by location. I think the one in Spokane is 11,000. The majority of LQ packs can put a beam across the arena with accuracy. Given the abuse they stand up to, there are some packs that simply won't, but even if you were to build an outdoor laser tag kit, there's no reason you couldn't get a laser to hit accurately on anything within direct line of sight. Granted, you're not going to haul a 3 foot collamater on the field with you, usually..

      Corrective fire. You can't really see what you are hitting. Aim VERY carefully.

      Most laser tag arena's are blacklight and neon painted for visibility, and then fogged to enhance the visibility of the beam. Some centers even use green lasers.

      Popularity. Paintball is way more popular, or at least more organized.

      Laser Quest has an annual 9 man tournament scene, with quad-regional and national events, forming teams of the best players from each of their 60+ US locations. There's also an active European scene. In addition, there are player run side tournaments, some of which have significant draw. I personally spend about a grand a year in hotels and travel expenses just going places to play in tournaments. It's fun, and it's an excuse to travel.

      Both can be fun, though.

      And that's the important part. Paintball is not Laser Tag, and Laser Tag is not paintball. If you want realistic combat, join the Army. If you want simulated combat, play paintball. If you just want to have fun and still be competitive, without taking home welts and shelling out for gear, play Laser tag.

      --
      - billn
  174. Your observations yield interesting ideas by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    Change the rules and the equipment a little. Allow potentiometers on the guns to tune the LED output. Let it range from 90% to 150% power or so.

    Allow three LEDs of the player's choosing per game. If you burn out an LED during the game because you were trying to shoot too far, tough shit.

    LED choices could include bright LEDs with small angles to wide-angle but dim.

    This would add an interesting element of strategy.

    I suppose disco balls could, too.

    Wes

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:Your observations yield interesting ideas by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      How about introducing multiple "hit" encodings. Have 3 basic firing modes, Shotgun, Carbine, and Sniper. For each firing mode, the damage inflicted is weighted by the intensity of the beam recieved. A shotgun signal at a barely detectable range would count for a few hitpoints, while a sniper shot at the same range would count as a full kill.

      Sure, you would have to throw in a little extra hardware. In addition to the signal decoder, you would have to improvise an ampletude detector. (Not hard really. You are pulling a voltage right off the sensor.)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  175. think about it by moby · · Score: 1

    i think the obvious solution is a combination of paintball with laser tag. it could be called laserball or paintag [either way].
    seriously, combine the best features of both.
    take the "feel" nature of the paintball with the enforced nature of lasertag.
    upon being shot, the system could disable your paintball gun in milliseconds preventing any type of cheating.
    you just have to detect the paintball hits and rig the paintballl guns to be electronically disabled.
    take a hint from the US, include depleted uranium in the paintballs and attach geiger counters to the paintball guns.
    obvious!

  176. Some suggestions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since there don't seem to be that many suggestions around here other than "Paintball!" or "MILES!", I figured I'd pitch in.
    First off, don't bother with lasers. Too complicated, what with the eye-damage regulations. If you want to reduce the beamwidth, there are a couple of measures that you want to take. Firstly, ditch whatever IR and visual LEDs on the emitter. Replace them with high-efficiency, low-angle versions. Search for something called OD50L. Then (here's the clever bit), extend the barrel by 6 inches with a length of 1" ABS tubing, or something. Cover the end with a plastic cap, and drill a hole in the middle so that the hole and emitter LED are aligned. If you've got a 6" extension, that'll get you a beam angle of about one degree. You'll probably want to do something about the wasted power hitting the inside of the cover. The alternative is to mount a convex lens (IR lens... not your average glass jobby) with the transmitter LED at the focal point, so that you've got a parallel (but wider) beam coming out of the end.
    Of course, that doesn't give you any visual feedback of your targeting point, so you might want to add some sights... I remember a "laser" tag system from when I was tiny that had a tube mounted on top, in which was mounted a sheet of perspex at 45 degrees, with a pinhole under it and an LED below that. The pinhole made a red dot appear in the center of the sight. Very easy to build, and you could even rig it for calibration quite easily, if your beam accuracy made it necessary (think about putting the pinhole/LED on a low-pitch multi-thread adjuster in 2 dimensions... not too hard :-)
    Hmm... just had a thought. If you need the sight to work without power, you could replace the LED with the luminous head from a watch-hand.
    Actually, if you're going to go about calibrating your sights, you might as well make the IR LED unit plug-in, and make an identical one with a high-efficiency optical LED. That way, you can match up your sights to the fitted optics without needing a target to shoot at. Alternatively, watch your shots through a webcam, and adjust appropriately.
    Generally increasing the number of target points has to be on the list as well. If you're up to increasing the number of receiver phototransistors (I presume that's what they are), do it, but don't just leave them dangling on their own. Instead, find something that's going to act as a good concentrator. What you want is a reflective surface that will tend to direct incident light off to one side, or that will just diffuse light really well. You want to be mounting the phototransistors so that they're looking approximately parallel to the surface, so that a hit within a (relatively) large area of your diffuser will result in a large enough signal going in to the receiver to trigger it. That makes your whole receiver module large and flat, with a small number of connections, which is precisely what you want.
    If you want to do some severe modding (as in time consuming, not difficult), you could make hand grenades quite simply. Take the circuitry from one gun, and build a shell for it out of IR LEDs, wired in parallel with the original output LED from the gun.
    There are high-power IR emitters with 120 degree output, so I'd use a few of those. You'll need to arrange extra power and switching, but that's relatively trivial. Then make mechanical arrangements for the trigger switch to be pressed once and once only at the appropriate moment. Left as an exercise for the reader. Similarly for landmines, etc. If you embed the inner workings in potting compound (and are damn careful where you aim it) it might make an effective indirect-fire round, too...
    Next thought... Kites. If you're playing outside, a kite would be a damn good way to lift an emitter over cover, assuming you've got an effective way to eliminate friendly fire. Launch the kite first, then run the emitter up the line and either trigger it at the top, or arrange for it to parachute down once it gets there. Actually... Sod it. Go for a UAV. Arrange for a model glider to be circling over your enemy's position, constantly broadcasting your shots downwards.
    Hmm... Food for thought. I'll be back with more after sleep.

  177. Make laser tag more interesting, with a mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1. Remove Laser from lasertag gun
    Step 2. Attach to live-round fire arm
    Step 3. Get arested and sent to the arse pounding penitentary.
    Step 4. ??????? ;)
    Step 5. Profit

  178. how to make a tron suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    1. take a ready made tron suit. ebay is good.

    2. take the tron suit apart

    3. paint it a different colour

    4. voila! a home made tron suit.

    by tron suit guy

  179. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 0

    I have to agree against traditional martial arts. Practical versions are better, but 'taditional' is most definately worse.

    Karate, for instance, is largely set-piece. Actions are done in a specific way and that makes your opponent predictable. Yes, you can beat someone when sparring, but you'll end up relying on them always following the rules of karate.

    You then get into a real fight and discover that your opponent is not predictable and you lose all advantage. You just cease to be unpredictable.

    --
    FGD 135
  180. Corkscrew Gun by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

    Im not sure how long you can make the rotation, but a corkstrew (sciam.com) lasertag gun might be really cool.

  181. USA has lost perspective about guns by mr_tap · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Always carry chambered! If you're trying to beat the bad guy to the draw, the extra half a second it takes to rack the slide WILL cost you your life.

    Glad I do not live in the USA. Seriously you guys should take a step back and see how things work anyway else in the world (not counting war zones and third world countries)

    1. Re:USA has lost perspective about guns by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Anywhere else, you just get shot. At least here, you get a fair chance. *shrug*

      Research by Jeff Miron at Boston University, examining homicide rates across 44 countries, found that countries with the strictest gun-control laws also tended to have the highest homicide rates. News reports in Britain showed how crimes with guns have risen 40 percent in the four years after handguns were banned in 1997. Police are extremely important in stopping crime, but almost always arrive on the scene after the crime occurs. What would the U.N. recommend that victims do when they face criminals by themselves? Passive behavior is much more likely to result in serious injury or death than using a gun to defend oneself.

      http://www.lewrockwell.com/lott/lott9.html

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    2. Re:USA has lost perspective about guns by lastmachine · · Score: 1

      : Glad I do not live in the USA. Seriously you guys should take a step back and see how things work anyway else in the world (not counting war zones and third world countries) :: Please recall that the United States is a country of people who saw how things were somewhere else and didn't like it.

    3. Re:USA has lost perspective about guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually it's a country full of people that no one else wanted....

      or at least it was 300 years ago.

      Now it's a country full of people that aren't aware there _is_ anywhere else....

    4. Re:USA has lost perspective about guns by mr_tap · · Score: 1
      That is just propaganda. I was about to write my own response to this quote (based in living in Australia), when google found me one here:
      Lott does not mention that none of Miron's correlations between gun-control laws and homicide were statistically significant. (In his book it's worse--Lott falsely claims that half of the correlations are significant.) Nor does he mention that Miron's measure of gun laws was badly flawed. Their measure was a simple three point scale with 0 being no laws, 1 being some controls, and 2 a complete ban. On this scale the US and the UK have the same gun laws, and France and Germany have less restrictive laws than the US.

      And Lott unaccountably fails to mention all of the studies that have examined the relationship between gun ownership and homicide with international data. The most sophisticated of these, with a vastly better measure of gun ownership and more statistical controls than Miron is by Anthony Hoskin in Justice Quarterly 18:3 pp. 569-592 (2001). Hoskin found:
      "Two-stage least squares regression, which controls for homicide's effect on firearm availability in addition to a number of other confounding factors, reveals a statistically significant positive effect of firearm availability on national homicide rates. The magnitude of the association is considerable. The observed relationship is found to be insensitive to sample composition. Results also indicate that homicide rates do not influence levels of firearm availability."
      That's more guns, more crime. Don't expect Lott to admit that this study exists any time soon.
    5. Re:USA has lost perspective about guns by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Seriously you guys should take a step back and see how things work anyway else in the world (not counting war zones and third world countries)

      That's the point. No one ever expects things to take a downturn. Let's take a step back and see how things have workd elswhere in the world.

      In 1929 the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, approximately 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

      In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915-1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

      Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

      China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

      Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

      Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

      Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million "educated" people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


      The crime rate here in the US, which so many people claim to be astronomical, doesn't even come close to the death toll in places where private gun ownership has been prohibited.

      I believe in democracy, if people where YOU live want to do so without guns, that's your right. I will not give up mine. End of discussion.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:USA has lost perspective about guns by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1

      Like John Sayles said in "Men with Guns": "There are two types of men here, my friend: Men with guns and men without."

      And in many, many countries, that is the difference between power and powerless, life and death.

  182. Damn... by mr_tap · · Score: 1
    whenever you get tagged not only are you embarrassed but your jiggling and peeing yourself as well

    I laughed so loud reading this post that the same thing happened to me :)

  183. My suggestions by magefile · · Score: 1
    These would require some EE skills that I don't have. Or maybe just some googling for someone who's already done this:
    • sniper rifles?
    • grenades/mines/bombs (these do come with off the shelf sets)

    These wouldn't require anything but some imagination:
    • scenarios - like in CS; hostage (one vs. many, one + guard(s) vs. others), assassination
    • a more lengthy scenario: bomb defusal, with a box with some sort of lock that takes time to open, or get everyone to learn how to pick Masterlock combo locks
    • treasure hunt/clues spread around + laser tag
  184. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

    This is exactly how I was taught. Avoid the fight if possible, but if you need to, use the force needed to stop the fight in the least amount of time. Since I learned a combination of Tae Kwon Do and Hap Ki Do, this generally involves breaking joints or bones, or other things that apply large amounts of force to small areas.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  185. Laser taggers are terrorists by Boarder2 · · Score: 1

    In high school, some friends and I got laser tag guns and were playing in a park at night. A friend and I were hiding in a bush when we heard a vehicle pull up behind us. All of a sudden a spot light shines on us and we hear "TURN AROUND AND PUT YOUR HANDS UP!" "Uh, oh, shit." Police pulled us out at gun point, everyone else had to come join us and we were all made to sit on the ground at gun point. Being the young easy going kids that we were, we laughed and chuckled at being drawn out at gunpoint over laser tag. Backup arrived and they were joking around with us and being cool. All in all the night ended with the original cops telling us they could give us trespassing tickets and giving curfew tickets to those who were under 18.

    Good times.

  186. Old Style Laser Tag by kalmite · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember back many years ago (10+) there was Laser Tag gear out that looked much different than the ones shown on lasertag.org. As a matter of fact the ones I am thinking of were quite realistic (in color at least). They were black guns, kind of futuristic, with these velcro sensors that you could put on your chest (with a black harnass or silver vest). The sensor had a red dome on it with LEDs in it. That was the good laser tag gear... not this new green and red junk that Walmart is selling... those look like the competing brand out at about the same time (even had a TV show with that brand in it).

    Now the question is do I still have that stuff floating around my parent's house???

    1. Re:Old Style Laser Tag by kalmite · · Score: 1

      Alright did a little googling and found it... the products are made by LazerTag

      http://www.adequate.com/LazerTag/equipment/

      The gun is the StarLyte and the sensor was the StarSensor

      Those are the good old days... oh well, I doubt my wife would want to play lazer tag with me anyway.

  187. laser nuke by aquabat · · Score: 2, Funny
    You can simulate a mini tactical nuke by holding a pair of binoculars up to the laser emitter, eyepiece to the emitter. The lenses will spread the beam into a deadly swath of destruction in the direction you shoot.

    We used to do this with Miles gear in the army. Who says war can't be fun?

    --
    A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  188. Modding Laser Tag Gear by Misanthrope · · Score: 1

    http://www.armory.com/~spcecdt/lazertag.html
    I'm surprised nobody brought up this little gem.

  189. Paintball vs LQ. Apples and Mach 4 Oranges. Bitch. by billn · · Score: 1

    I've played both. The problem with paintball is that the advantage is typically to the players with the most money to spend on gear. LQ at least offers some amount of balance by providing the gear for you. That said, hardcore LQ players will happily educate slow ass paintball players what real reflexes are.

    They'll also teach you the folly of the 'pain gun tag' idea. Personally, I can tag you fast enough and often enough that A: Your pack will never come back online and B: You'll wish you'd stuck with paintball.

    Simple facts:
    Paintball is high impact and low speed.
    LQ is high speed and low impact.

    In LQ, it's about speed, consistant accuracy and reflexes (also known as skill) and not who can lay paint the fastest. I'll cut paintball some slack and offer the tactical experience is good. Then I'll take it back because LQ games can be far more complex and adaptive.

    Average, decent LQ players can fire 100 shots a minute without resorting to (limited interval) rapid fire. Paintball players may or may not be able to lay down that kind of fire, consistently, without running out of ammo.

    A good LQ player can lay accurate fire in a full 360 degree arc without ever changing stance. The same player can also translate this to a paintball field with stunning effect, in addition to being accurate from an off-axis firing position.

    A fast LQ player can read body language fast enough to dodge a laser beam, forget about your slow ass paintballs fired from a limited arc posture.

    In an LQ arena, running is a bad idea because you're playing in a literal maze. The best LQ players can move at full speed and stop on a dime, because they don't have massive beer guts to weigh them down, while depending on a 10+ shot per second paint marker to keep the other team at bay. Plus, there's kids in there, man, what are you thinking?

    Speaking of other teams, most LQ competitions are *three* team games, in a 1v1v1 environment. Paintball tacticians would probably go 'tilt' with that kind of concept.

    And as another poster mentioned, you'll never hear the best LQ players coming until your pack tells you they're there. A light footed LQ player is also not fun to play paintball with, for the exact same reason.

    Pound for pound, LQ players stack up to paintball players with ease, but the reverse is not true.

    Oh, and you can play LQ in a tux.

    </troll>

    --
    - billn
  190. Even better by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    Chemical Lasers!

  191. Desperately Seeking Force Feedback... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    My biggest issue with laser tag is the lack of physical feedback. It doesn't even nessisarily have to hurt, but it's GOT to be something more substantial than a weak vibration. I'm thinking of adding big relays tied to the trigger that kick the gun with a nice solid thud or something everytime you fire. Likewise the vests when you get hit.

    Of course, it can't be hard to design a vest that'll shock you everytime you get hit if you're looking for something more potent. Like those ,a href="http://www.softwareandstuff.com/h_misc_super flyzap.html">Electric Fly Swatter Raquets. Seriously, those things BITE. Hell, with as cheap as they are, you can probably cannibalize the components and line the inside to the vest with mesh, tied to the relay that would normally indicate your hit with the buzz effect. And all it'd take is another could off AA batteries. AND the beefy relay to thud the vest.

    Don't forget to ask me about my acid paintballs...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  192. The obvious answer by Xilo · · Score: 1

    What other sorts of inexpensive things could be added to our gear to make it more interesting?

    Linux, duh. You could use the beams to send binary-encoded data as standard input, and flash the LEDs, which I assume the gear already has, to signal output.

    Actual thought I just had: instead of emitting a fairly standard sound to signify a hit, acquire some digital recorders (talking picture frames and gift cards come to mind) and record stuff into them, then hack them to go off in place of the usual speaker. One could even have a bunch of them per suit, and have a [pseudo-]random circuit to trigger one of them each hit.

    Also, I think it would be fairly easy to add more sensors.. that would make it better, I think.

    --
    Read; Write; Execute
  193. You forgot to add... by xRelisH · · Score: 1

    7) Profit!

  194. HUD by H3g3m0n · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember those sega lock-on things. They where quite good considering they where only a gun and a headset. Several game modes and teams. They where quite robust also. Coolest feature though was the huds that showed your score (Just a small bit of plastic that reflected the letters). http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/5487/laser tag/lockongear.html

    --
    cat /dev/urandom > .sig
  195. Perspective from what vantage point? by $ASANY · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've lived in europe as well as in the US. It's probably unrealistic to expect that american notions of what society is/should be like would apply well in europe, but it is tragically misguided to think that somehow european societal norms would apply better in the US than what's currently in place. Would the US be a better place if we just acted more like Germany or France? No. No more than the world would be a better place if it was just more like america.

    Firearms ownership is a cultural legacy in the US that can't be wiped out. And in a real world where bad guys are armed regardless of the law, that legacy is actually useful to society. It permits citizens to be personally responsible for their own safety if they so choose. Additionally, and probably more importantly, it allows citizens to have the means to resist the sort of tyrants that in the past have made a large number of countries into horror shows of citizens being abused and murdered by their own governments. Law-abiding citizens who own firearms have caused nothing near the mayhem that governments have historically wrought on their own peoples. So the man who legally carries a firearm and has never harmed anyone isn't the bane of society.

    Those of us in the world who have entrusted our governments with the sole power of lethal force are in far more danger than those places where good citizens are trusted to have the ability to defend themselves and their families. History is pretty clear on this.

    1. Re:Perspective from what vantage point? by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

      Those of us in the world who have entrusted our governments with the sole power of lethal force are in far more danger than those places where good citizens are trusted to have the ability to defend themselves and their families. History is pretty clear on this.


      You must have some weird history where you live then... maybe statistics may be a better source of information on weither people are in more danger? I mean, according to the avilable information, there is less crime per citizen in Norway (where you must get a lisence for a gun, and those are hard to get) than in the USA*. Of the crime we do have, there is a smaller percentage of violent crimes. Of the violent crimes, there is a smaller percentage of crimes involving guns.


      Please note that I'm not saying that restricting access to firearms would magicly transforms the US to a place I would like to settle down - what is needed to make the US a safer place is a nationwide change in peoples approch to firearms and violence in general... something which would include a timemachine and some serious rewriting of history. The US is, for a lot of reasons, not the same as Europe. Not better or worse, but different.


      *) that is, the USA as a whole - I'm well aware that there is more crime, and more violent crime, in the major cities than in, for instance, the city of Hen, WV

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    2. Re:Perspective from what vantage point? by baker_tony · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Those of us in the world who have entrusted our governments with the sole power of lethal force are in far more danger than those places where good citizens are trusted to have the ability to defend themselves and their families. History is pretty clear on this

      Don't the people in Iraq run around with guns too, just like America?

    3. Re:Perspective from what vantage point? by $ASANY · · Score: 1
      Crime rates anywhere are nothing compared to the number of people murdered by their own governments. How many of their own people did Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Hitler murder? The figures run well into the hundreds of millions. Fortunately this has happened on this scale in a relatively few countries. On a smaller scale, though, it happens nearly everywhere. It unfortunately happens in the US from time to time, in ones and twos and sometimes a few more. My understanding is that this is hardly unique to the US.

      In regards to criminal violence, it kind of goes without saying that criminals are the ones committing the crimes, not the law-abiding, some of whom may own firearms. There are obviously societal differences between countries that impact how this criminal element decides to act, and perhaps there are some lessons to be learned that could help out. Some of this I suspect is simply due to demographic differences that are much harder to change. I haven't seen too many massive , ethnically diverse, low income urban areas in Norway that rival South L.A., the Bronx, South Chicago or Southwest D.C., and those are the places that experience the highest violent crime rates.

      I'd suspect that if swords and daggers were the only weapons available to criminals, the U.S. would still have a higher crime rate than places like Norway, the only difference would be the nature of the wounds. That, and probably a higher mortality rate, since daggers don't need to be aimed and urban criminals are notoriously poor shots with handguns.

      Heck, if I thought it possible that banning firearms would absolutely put an end to violence, I'd be first in line to turn 'em in. Really. As it is, it's my sole real means to confront it, and I'd rather have the choice about employing an effective means of resistance than to unilaterally disarm and put myself at the mercy of criminals.

    4. Re:Perspective from what vantage point? by jcrowly · · Score: 1

      Societies evolve and change, just because a Society acted one way in the past does not mean it has to do so forever. The USA's predilection for gun's is a historical fact, however many so called certainties have changed as time went on. No body needs own a Gun, and the Idea that the citizens having Gun's could in some way stop a tyrant is laughable. There have been many countries that have been ruled by tyrants where the population have been armed, yet the tyrant reminded in power and the people reminded oppressed (Iraqies had and still have guns). The US could start the process of banning and destroying gun's, and while it may not effect gun crime straight away in time it would, and all processes must start some where. There is one thing you could be sure of banning and destroying gun's would not result, in more gun related deaths.

      There is a time honored piece of Wisdom, those that do not learn from history are bound to repeat the mistakes of the past, and there is one word all Americans should learn from Columbine.

    5. Re:Perspective from what vantage point? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Don't the people in Iraq run around with guns too, just like America?

      Just the remnants of Saddam's military. Saddam denied access to firearms to the populace. You see how safe that made them.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:Perspective from what vantage point? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      There is a time honored piece of Wisdom, those that do not learn from history are bound to repeat the mistakes of the past, and there is one word all Americans should learn from Columbine.

      I have one word for you Padukah. That's where a school shooting was stopped by an armed citizen.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    7. Re:Perspective from what vantage point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...the Idea that the citizens having Gun's could in some way stop a tyrant is laughable."

      Obviously, laughable. It's never happend before. Oh, wait. It's happened several times, with the American Revolution just being the most famous (and arguably the only one that ended well for the bulk of the rebels rather than the select few who ended up in power after the revolution).

      "There is one thing you could be sure of banning and destroying gun's would not result, in more gun related deaths."

      Not going to argue that (in the long run), but I will argue that fewer gun-related deaths does not necessarily equal fewer violence-related deaths.

      Given: No guns are available to anyone.
      Which of these assumptions is valid.
      A: No one will be killed by a gun.
      B: Fewer people will be killed in violent acts.

  196. No. THIS is how you do it. . ! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Objective?

    Realistic Star Wars Blaster Battles.

    The Conclusion?

    The current game technology isn't there. Even WITH green lasers, (Though, that's getting somewhat closer.)

    What I suggest is the following. . .

    Full clips of tracer rounds! Those things actually look like Star Wars blaster bolts! And looks are the first step.

    Sound? Well. . . Get this: When you fire a gun, you get a lot of fast-moving hot gas, right? It makes sound. Okay. So then you have silencers, which are good at diffusing all that fast-moving hot gas so that it makes very little sound. Right? So then why not a gun modification which doesn't just kill the sound, but rather changes it? I mean, why not? That's what vocal cords do. There's a thousand different musical instruments out there which take moving air and shape it. Sure, you could probably spend millions of dollars screwing around with phonics technology trying to come up with just the right noise, but the fact of the matter is that it could be done, and once you know all the right shapes of metal tube to use, the finished product is low tech and as easy to produce as a kazoo.

    So then you'd have both the looks and the sounds!

    How about the feel?

    Beats me. What does it feel like to get shot with a blaster round? Or a tracer round, for that matter? Probably not good. (Keeping in mind, safety isn't really much of a concern with me, particularly since I don't imagine a properly cool Star Wars blaster system is going to materialize any time soon. Wear a jacket or something and try not to aim for your friend's head.)

    Anyway, I suspect the formulation of the flare could be tinkered with. --If you think about it, you'd only really need enough burn-time to last the half second or so that the projectile is airbourn, so the material could be gone the instant it hits the target. Magicians use stuff called 'Flash paper', which is chemically perfect for the job. --Makes a nice rosy blaze for a second or so while you produce your pidgeons or whatever, and then it's gone. You can light the stuff in your hands and not get burned. Neato! In fact, you could even put enough flare material in the round so that it burns for a second after it hits the target. If you formulate it just so, you could probably even get it to flare up for a moment after striking. I bet you could also make a gram of theatrical flash-powder go off on inmpact as well to make a little flash and 'poof'. (Though, I suspect that would be rather pushing the safety margine a touch!)

    Anyway, for the final effect, I'd want the projectile to have a second, paintball-like component, except rather than dye, it would be filled with a black chalk dust to simulate blaster scorch marks on targets. Now, honestly. Tell me it wouldn't look just desperately cool to be able to riddle walls with realistic-looking blaster impact marks!

    So. . .

    Sounds like a blaster, Looks like blaster fire, and everybody knows when the target has been hit.

    And finally, you could wire your combat area up to play John Williams over a global sound system. . .

    Yes, actually, I HAVE thought about this rather too much, which just goes to show; that which influences you when you were a kid, has a tendency to stick.

    Now, if I could just think of a way to integrate all of this clumsy blaster stuff with some of those cool light sabers. . .


    -FL

  197. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

    nihilism. Yes, Martial arts has a good press agent. No doubt about it. But that doesn't detract from it's basic qualities. Particuarly those stemming from the way it is taught. Boxing may teach respect and disapline, if so good. But I'm no Jingoist, I don't need the system to be American to be effective. I grew up a small kid, youngest in the class. I got in plenty of fights. Those stoped AFTER I took karate. I wasn't worried about acting tough, or establishing myself. I didn't have to any more. Reality is that people fight. And if it does happen it may not be your sons choice. The bully will decide to start the fight for him. The bully will pick on the easiest target. Don't be that target. Confidence is like bully repelent.

  198. Cops get jumpy by cgenman · · Score: 1

    I was stopped one day by a cop while walking down the street. The car zoomed in front of me, a cop jumped out, pulled out a gun, and pointed it at, of all people, me. I found this behavior odd, and not at all to my liking. And then he yelled "put down the knife."

    Knife. I had picked up somebody's discarded plastic halloween samurai sword, which I had found by the side of the road. It was clearly plastic, more round than blade-shaped, and did I mention perfectly white? The amusing thing was the baffled look on the cop's face when he heard the sound it made skidding across the cement towards him. I guess that finally shattered his illusion of the ivory-smuggling holigan he thought he had cornered.

    He appologized, said some lady up the street got skittish and called the cops, and when on his way. I left the ivory knife there for the next kid to find.

  199. At my friendly neighbourhood fabric store... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    ... you can buy 3M Scotchbrite (the reflective stuff on high-vis jackets) by the metre. I don't know how much it costs. My GF wants to make a whole outfit out of it. At least I'd be able to find her easily in dimly-lit clubs...

  200. From neither Europe or America by mr_tap · · Score: 1
    but it is tragically misguided to think that somehow european societal norms would apply better in the US

    Actually you shouldn't assume that I am from Europe simply because I am not from the USA. As a matter of fact, I am not from Asia or Africa or even North/South America either. "Where else is there?" the crowd calls - I am from Australia.

    According to this data, back in 1999 (newest data I could find in a hurry) our national gun deaths (excluding suicides) was 84 (50 homicide,28 accidents,4 legal invention). How small a city in the USA do you need to look at to compare to our national gun death total? For everyones info the national population is about 20 million.

    Now perhaps our road death toll might be a world competitive, but remember that we are the land of Mad Max.

    1. Re:From neither Europe or America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given: No guns available.
      Which of these assumptions are valid.
      A: No deaths will be related to gun use.
      B: No deaths will be related to violent acts.
      C: Deaths caused by violence will decrease.

      I'll give you a hint, the correct answer is A. How are your national violent crime statistics? There are studies that have shown (I'm not qualified to give an evaluation of those studies.) that in countries where guns have been restricted, the result was a net increase in violent deaths, where the weapon of choice either stayed the same (a gun) or changed to a bludgeoning instrument.

    2. Re:From neither Europe or America by mr_tap · · Score: 1
      Here are the Australian homicide statistics as well as sorted by weapon type. As you can see from 1993 to 2002 the number of homicides is pretty steady, so given that our population is rising that is actually a relative reduction.

      Firearm control has been more strict since the late 90s, so percentage using firearms has dropped down and "other weapon" has increased, but 300-350 homicides a year ain't too bad I think.

    3. Re:From neither Europe or America by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The US has other factors that contribute to it being a more violent country than most others that are as financially affluent. We have a much more diverse population than any other nation on the planet. We have a greater discrepancy between the wealthy and the poor than any other nation on the planet.

      If we could magically remove every firearm from the country tonight, tomorrow the homicide rate would remain virtually unchanged, we'd just have higher numbers of murders with knives, swords, bows & arrows, baseball bats and lead pipes.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  201. How does the game continue ? by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1
    b. assign a judge, and everyone else draws a name from a hat. The person drawn is your target

    When you have "killed" someone you do then get this persons target as your next target ?

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
    1. Re:How does the game continue ? by damiam · · Score: 1
      When you have "killed" someone you do then get this persons target as your next target ?

      ... the dead man gives the live one his target ...

      It would appear so.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  202. Re:I have 4 kids, nothing violent is . . . by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

    I agree My mother sent me to all sorts of training (in all I learned 4 different forms of martial arts). My grandad taught me about firearms. And I took it on my self to learn about different forms of fighting with swords (but that was just display type fun) However I never ever really got into a serious fight I always either walked away or talked my way out of it. It wound the bullies up more when I would not respond to their chicken insults much more than hitting them. However nowdays (now that I'm an old fart) when some friends start messing about fighting I can't hit them or do anything nasty from the fear of causing them serious damage. But that's another thing the martial arts taught me, self control. However I am still learning a new skill Marital arts (2 months and counting)

  203. Supersoakers? by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    Unless there are some new models I don't know of, they're just way too large. We used to use little squirt guns that we could palm off... I think they were like 2 for $1 in the early 90s. You might be able to get something at the dollar store these days... And well, they cost a whole lot less than a supersoaker, so it wasn't as big of a deal with they got confiscated.

    And well, there was always hitting the person with a rubber band, for the really stealthy.

    It's the concept of stalking people and having 'contracts' on each other that I'm guessing would be more of an issue if you got caught. (it'd probably be good to make sure that any game materials clearly explained that it was a game, and where to find the rules, etc, just incase someone acts stupid, and gets stopped by some authority)

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Supersoakers? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      The point of a supersoaker was for an ambush only. It would be the equivalent of getting gunned down by a Tommy Gun. Sure, it was very brazen, but the rules of the games I was playing didn't specifically prohibit a supersoaker, just that like you said, it was so big that usually it wouldn't be used.

      Generally a supersoaker isn't considered a firearm in the usual sense, and if a police officer caught you with one it is less likely that they would draw their own firearm on you. Some of the smaller squirt guns and other "missile" launchers could be mistaken for a firearm, so you might just end up dead by the hands of a cop by mistake if you used them. It still wouldn't be good to hit an on-duty police officer with a supersoaker, however.

  204. From the Macek files : by JoshNorton · · Score: 1
    Zentraedi : Minmei!

    SFX : CRACK-BLAMMO!

    Minmei : My name has become a killing word...

    Yeah, that one was going to go over well with the Macross fanboys...

    --
    "Stupid! Stupid stupid stupid stupid! I touched the hot wire right there - I'm an idiot!"
  205. Really bad idea! Re:Green Lasers by AlienRelics · · Score: 1

    Real lasers are a really horrendously bad idea.

    Here's my stock answer:

    "Laser Pointers Pose Risk For Children
    Following two reports of eye injuries from children's misuse of hand-held laser pointers, FDA warned parents and school officials about the risk.

    Laser pointers are generally safe when used as intended by teachers and lecturers to highlight areas on a chart or screen. However, price reductions have led to wider marketing, and FDA is concerned about promotion and use of the products as children's toys.

    Light energy from a laser pointer aimed into the eye can be more damaging than staring directly into the sun. Federal law requires a warning on the product label about this potential hazard from lasers. Momentary exposure, as from an inadvertent sweep of the light across a person's eyes, causes only temporary flash blindness. But even this can be dangerous to someone who is driving or performing some other activity for which vision is critical."

    http://www.fda.gov/fdac/departs/1998/298_upd.htm l

    "(6) Class IIa laser product means any laser product that permits human access during operation to levels of visible laser radiation in excess of the accessible emission limits contained in table I, but does not permit human access during operation to levels of laser radiation in excess of the accessible emission limits contained in table II-A of paragraph (d) of this section.
    \2-

    \2\ Class IIa levels of laser radiation are not considered to be hazardous if viewed for any period of time less than or equal to 1x10\3\ seconds but are considered to be a chronic viewing hazard for any period of time greater than 1x10\3\ seconds.
    -

    (7) Class II laser product means any laser product that permits human access during operation to levels of visible laser radiation in excess of the accessible emission limits contained in table II-A, but does not permit human access during operation to levels of laser radiation in excess of the accessible emission limits contained in table II of paragraph (d) of this section.
    \3-

    \3\ Class II levels of laser radiation are considered to be a chronic viewing hazard."

    http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdoc s/ cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?FR=1040.10

    10^3 seconds is just shy of 17 minutes. Add two Class II or IIa pointers together (a visible and an IR) and it's into Class III territory.

    More:

    "Class 2 lasers are low power visible (400- to 700-nm wavelength) lasers and laser systems which cannot emit radiation in excess of the AEL based on a 0.25 second exposure."

    http://www.navylasersafety.com/faq/technical.htm

    Note the warnings about them being a chronic exposure hazard.

    And in the end, something going wrong with a laser pointer can potentially cause it to put out hazardous levels. ... further info .... Bad turns to worse, I noticed that all the current laser pointers are class IIIa!

    "(8) Class IIIa laser product means any laser product that permits human access during operation to levels of visible laser radiation in excess of the accessible emission limits contained in table II, but does not permit human access during operation to levels of laser radiation in excess of the accessible emission limits contained in table III-A of paragraph (d) of this section. \4-

    \4\ Class IIIa levels of laser radiation are considered to be, depending upon the irradiance, either an acute intrabeam viewing hazard or chronic viewing hazard, and an acute viewing hazard if viewed directly with optical instruments."

    So the new Class IIIa laser pointers can potentially cause spot blindness from one exposure!

  206. Happy Fun Ball by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    Happy Fun Ball
    It's Happy! It's Fun! It's Happy Fun Ball!

    Yes, Happy Fun Ball, the toy sensation that's sweeping the nation. Only $14.95 at particpating stores!

    Get one Today!

    Warning: Pregnant women, the elderly and children under 10 should avoid prolonged exposure to Happy Fun Ball.

    Caution: Happy Fun Ball may suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds.

    Happy Fun Ball contains a liquid core, which, if exposed due to rupture, should not be touched, inhaled, or looked at.

    Do not use Happy Fun Ball on concrete.
    Discontinue use of Happy Fun Ball if any of the following occurs:

    * Itching
    * Vertigo
    * Dizziness
    * Tingling in extremities
    * Loss of balance or coordination
    * Slurred speech
    * Temporary Blindness
    * Profuse sweating
    * Heart Palpitations

    If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.

    Happy Fun Ball may stick to certain types of skin.

    When not in use, Happy Fun Ball should be returned to its special container and kept under refrigeration...

    Failure to do so relieves the makers of Happy Fun Ball, Wacky Products Incorporated, and its parent company Global Chemical Unlimited, of any and all liability.

    Ingredients of Happy Fun Ball include an unknown glowing substance which fell to Earth, presumably from outer space.

    Happy Fun Ball has been shipped to our troops in Saudi Arabia and is also being dropped by our warplanes on Iraq.

    Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

    Happy Fun Ball comes with a lifetime guarantee.
    Happy Fun Ball: ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!

  207. How doth MILES suck?? Let me count the ways... by propellerhead_prime · · Score: 2, Informative

    Allow me answer all of your specific questions before I elaborate.

    Unreliable? Absolutely. To test out MILES gear soldiers will often resort to setting off the laser by tapping the sensor on the front of the unit (this is referred to as 'dry firing') and attempting to kill each other just to verify that their equipment works. If, after several likely unsuccessful attempts they do actually kill their buddy, he has to slink over to a referee and claim his equipment went off for no good reason and have his gear reset. Interestingly, there is a high enough incidence of the gear spontaneously going off and 'killing' players that this is utterly believable. When batteries begin to get low, then the gear often gives a 'false positive' and kills you...sort of an electronic death rattle I suppose. I have also had my equipment set off by flourescent lights and other RF emitters.

    Breaks down a lot? As a unit, we are often issued at least 10% more units of MILES than we need because they expect to have at least that much of stuff fail during use. I personally think it is horrendous that the government continues to invest in a system with that kind of failure rate.

    Inaccurate? Sort of. It's a laser, so it shoots straight, but mounting it onto your weapon so that straight for the laser corresponds to where you are pointing your rifle is a pain in the ass. The system comes with some mounting brackets intended to mate properly with an M-16, M-4, etc...but in practice using these alone results in a very loose attachment with the laser rattling left, right, up, down and everywhich way...and those few degrees of difference in aim at the barrel result in dozens of meters of difference for your target downrange. By its nature MILES will also never be able to accurately simulate the ballistic arc of a bullet over a long distance...not important to most people, but for training soldiers, a significant point.

    How else does MILES suck, you ask. Well, I'll tell you since you're interested. Perhaps most importantly, the designer of the system is clearly not acquainted with the most basic concepts of ergonomics. The heart of the system is a metal box, roughly 8x6 inches positioned directly between your shoulder blades...interesting location when you consider the targetted user group often wears 60-80 pound rucksacks that have to press down on this godforsaken piece of crap and drive it right into your back. Moreover, when worn as designed, MILES has some critical cabling that runs across the chest harness horizontally, about 3-4 inches below your throat. Given that anyone using MILES is going to be jumping, rolling, and crawling around, can you think of a worse place to run a line that can, and often, does effectively strangle the wearer? If you can you are more creative than I am. Then there is the halo...or as I refer to it, the crown of thorns. MILES uses a conceptually interesting idea where the target can be hit in the head or the torso. It accomplishes this with the 'halo' of sensors that ring a user's head. When shot, this halo broadcasts an RF signal to the harness, which registers the kill...theoretically. To make this work (READ: suck even worse) there is another of those evil metal boxes on the halo. (This is one of the major failings of MILES...the halo doesn't really work very well without a helmet to put it on. Take the weight of a helmet, then add about a pound and a half of halo, which only mounts off-center, thus unbalancing the system, and imagine wearing it for 2 weeks to a month straight during an exercise.) This box is needed to hold batteries and the RF transmitter to communicate a hit to the harness. Now, imagine you are in, oh, say a foxhole with another soldier. One of you gets shot in the head. Your halo sends out the RF signal, and does it register with just your harness? Of course not. You're both dead, thanks to MILES.

    I think that about sums up my major issues with MILES. Bottom line is that I cannot believe that f

  208. Some useful links to Build and Mod laser tag gear by AlienRelics · · Score: 1

    How about some actual useful links? That should suprise the heck out of everyone. ;'P

    The Lazer Tactical message board: http://members5.boardhost.com/lazertag/index.html

    More technically oriented Laserforums: http://www.laserforums.com/forum

    1 Source Laser Tag forums: http://blackbelt.novahq.net/forums/

    1 Source Laser Tag website, home of FXonixs homebrew laser tag gear, classifieds, and loads of links: http://www.1sourcelasertag.com/

    Miles Tag, a homebrew laser tag system in progress: http://lightbrain.8m.com/mtdesign.htm

    Frag Tag, a homebrew laser tag system using the same protocols as Miles Tag: http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/fragtag/index.htm

    Dave Bodger's Lazer Tag info. One of the first homebrew systems, compatible with the old Worlds of Wonder Lazer Tag and Tiger Electronic Survivor Shot, with tons of options: http://www.cix.co.uk/~lasertag/lasertag.htm

    Tagcon Midwest- Stargate in King Arthur's Court: http://www.tagcon.org/mw/

    Steradian Tech- pro laser tag gear, quite expensive: http://www.steradiantech.com/

    Tag Tek- homebrew WoW/ESS compatible gear: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/sparta/setup.htm

    Fiat Lux ESS compatible kits- They don't sell outside the UK, but good reference site for the rest of us: http://www.fiat-lux.org.uk/

    Lazer Skirmish- Commercial site, use for ideas and inspiration: http://www.laserskirmish.co.za/

    The Complete Tagger- Hints and modifications, PDF file: http://img-srv.everestwebworks.com/w2/Pictures/My% 20Files/1022260.1/tct2.pdf

    Upgrading WoW guns and sensors by Public John aka Lazerbait- Faster rate of fire, linking gun to sensor, autofire, etc. by Public John of the Seattle Laser Tag group: http://members.aol.com/publicjohn/index.html

    Vishay Semiconductors- IR Receiver modules page. 36 to 56KHz: http://www.vishay.com/ir-receiver-modules/

    Ward's Natural Science Lens page- Glass lenses, 38mm, various focal lengths. $1.50 each: http://wardsci.com/product.asp?pn=160433

    WoW/ESS signal format from Steradian- Helpful info on the signal format and frequency of WoW Lazer Tag/Survivor Shot guns and sensors. http://www.steradiantech.com/lasers/tech.html

    If you are anywhere near Seattle, WA, the Seattle Laser Tag Yahoogroup and website: http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/seattlelaserta g/ http://www.seattlelasertag.com/

    I'm personally working on better sensor heads. 99.9% of the homebrew gear uses the Vishay remote control receiver modules, and their performance in sunlight is terrible. I am also thinking of building a system that is compatible with Survivor Shot while still supporting other options like shooter ID.

    And as far as using real lasers- bad idea! Laser pointers are -not- eye safe. In fact the current crop of Class IIIa pointers are rated as a potential hazard from a -single- exposure. Even the older Class II/IIa are considered

  209. Re:Wide range laser-tag (Buffy-style) by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
    Except on hallow[ed] ground.

    Right. There you would use crossbows shooting sharpened stakes!

  210. Re:How doth MILES suck?? Let me count the ways... by indiechild · · Score: 1

    Wow. Thanks for the reply, the info is very much appreciated. I've never read anything but positive descriptions of MILES, so to hear a no-bull assessment from someone who's been there and done that is very enlightening.

    Good thing that MILES isn't a *real* live weapons system!

  211. Small of the back by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

    Where is it?

    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  212. Gah... by raehl · · Score: 1

    99% of what is said on that web page is just plain bullshit, except for the hop-up. Everything about rifling a sphere (there's no such thing) and everything said about paintball markers is just wrong. No concept of angular momentum whatsoever. Ugh.

    Airsoft barrels are not rifled because you can't rifle a round, plastic BB. And there is NO SUCH THING as a rifled paintball barrel - they are all smooth bore.

  213. mmmm... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    There's two methods... IR-LED (in cheap systems) or IR-laser diodes (in more expensive commercial systems). The latter requires multiple sensor areas with a certain amount of optical engineering in the vest, but it's more accurate. I am aware of ONE system that actually uses the sighting beam for registering hits (the "SLR" of lazer tag systems) , they modulate it with on a low-duty cycle PWM scheme so it doesn't make the laser look like it's flickering.

    The grandparent was insinuating that radio waves are emitted from the gun to register a hit... this is false. Radio spreads too much to be useful for aiming (worse than non-laser infrared). However, RF COM-link is often used in commercial equipment to trasnmit realtime information to and from the game server.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON