Slashdot Mirror


Batman Begins Trailer Online

meltoast writes "The trailer for the Batman Begins is available on the Warner Brothers website. Also check out the pictures of the new Batmobile on the same site. All I can say is holy big tires, Batman!" The Batmobile design is reminiscent of the one from Dark Knight Returns, but I think I prefer it over the one Adam West used to cruise around in.

481 comments

  1. I Believe.... by OS24Ever · · Score: 4, Informative

    ....that it is a 'teaser' not a 'trailer' considering they show absolutely nothing but that 'it's coming' in a year...

    I'm a little behind on my batman lore. What's with the monster truck batmobile in the pictures section?

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    1. Re:I Believe.... by One+Louder · · Score: 4, Informative

      Frank Miller did a deconstruction of the Batman myth in the graphic novel "The Dark Knight Returns" which takes place when he's in his sixties and comes out of retirement because the crime in Gotham has gotten out of hand. The Batmobile looks very much like the one in the photo gallery - oh, and Robin is a girl.

    2. Re:I Believe.... by mm0mm · · Score: 4, Interesting
      it is a 'teaser' not a 'trailer' considering they show absolutely nothing but
      Not necessarily absolutely nothing though. The very first thing I thought while watching it was that there was no legacy whatsoever from the world Tim Burton created in the previous series. ABSOLUTELY no more Joel Schumacher's so ambiguously gay theme either. Obviously Warner is reinventing the series, which is good. The film appears so British!!

      Director: Christopher Nolan
      Actors: Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Liam Neeson
      Location? ... hmm

      It's obviously more pessimistic and darker than the previous series. I was becoming sick lately of optimistic live-action adaptations of Marvel comics. I can't wait for this one.

    3. Re:I Believe.... by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Robin is a girl? Well, that takes care of the homosexual overtones, old chum.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    4. Re:I Believe.... by shigelojoe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, all that's left is the criminal pedophilia.

      Wait a minute... Bruce Wayne isn't Batman, Michael Jackson is!

    5. Re:I Believe.... by tealover · · Score: 4, Funny

      The film appears so British!!

      Oh no....shitty, subpar special effects !!!!

      P.S. I didn't know Morgan Freeman was British.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    6. Re:I Believe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      - oh, and Robin is a girl.

      you mean, "... and Robin decided to become a girl after the last Batman?"

    7. Re:I Believe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i, for one, believe michael cain will make a fine batman.

      oh, wait

    8. Re:I Believe.... by Kumkwat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh no....shitty, subpar special effects !!!!

      Oh no.... A DECENT PLOT and people who can ACT!

    9. Re:I Believe.... by forgotmypassword · · Score: 1

      It's obviously more pessimistic and darker than the previous series. I was becoming sick lately of optimistic live-action adaptations of Marvel comics. I can't wait for this one.

      Blade was optimistic?

      I didn't see The Punisher, but that didn't look optimistic.

    10. Re:I Believe.... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 4, Funny

      Like Aliens3!

      Oh... wait...

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    11. Re:I Believe.... by edunbar93 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's with the monster truck batmobile in the pictures section?

      That's easy. SUVs are in. Big and ugly means manly. Really. It does.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    12. Re:I Believe.... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Frank Miller did a deconstruction of the Batman myth in the graphic novel "The Dark Knight Returns"

      Actually, a few bits of that turned up in Tim Burton's Batman. The Joker's smiling poison, a few place names; but most importantly the whole ambience of Gotham City.

    13. Re:I Believe.... by MojoReisen · · Score: 1

      And the most interesting thing, IMHO, about Miller's Dark Knight is his take on the Caped Crusader.
      The Batman is a very dark, almost psychotic, vigilante with a serious death-wish. A far cry from the campy TV Batman or even the mainstream DC comics. He is no hero, just a very troubled man with lots of money and gadgets and a finely-honed athleticism, even at age 60. He is despised by everyone, save the newly-retired Comissioner Gordon (and the new Robin,who shows up later). And Gordon is just as cynical as Batman is about the state of society.
      If you like Batman, or Frank Miller, I'd highly recommend it for the fresh perspective on this comic icon.

      --
      "Nothing is impossible for the man who refuses to listen to reason"
    14. Re:I Believe.... by Basehart · · Score: 1

      The back end of the new batmobile really does have a "monster truck" feel, but the front end is mutant Formula One racecar.

      Take the nose off of anything driving around Hockenheim last weekend, spray it black and replace the tyres and that's what is embedded into the front of the new Batmobile.

      I love it. When and where can I get my 1/18 diecast version?

    15. Re:I Believe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy teaser released today aswell... But it didn't get a slashdot story...

    16. Re:I Believe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He just might. Just consider what happened to his apprentice in "The ciderhouse rules". Does it take a superhero to foster a superhero? ;)

    17. Re:I Believe.... by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

      It would've been cooler with Darren Aronofsky at the helm.

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
    18. Re:I Believe.... by erroneous · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Big and ugly means manly"

      For proof, see Ron Perlman.

      --
      erroneous: look me up in a dictionary
    19. Re:I Believe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you've been smoking, but I want some as well.

    20. Re:I Believe.... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Like Aliens3!

      No, like King Lear.

      Oh, you meant trashy, disposable eye candy. Sorry.

    21. Re:I Believe.... by cerebis · · Score: 5, Funny
      Perhaps it is only the new Batotractor, to accompany the the boat, plane, etc.

      As a wise alien once said merchandising, merchandising, merchandising!

    22. Re:I Believe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the later years, Batman became a huge NASCAR fan, put a trailer on his estate, and put the old Batmobile on blocks in the front yard. He then had a 'batporch' and 'batouthouse' to match.

    23. Re:I Believe.... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Daredevil either.

    24. Re:I Believe.... by Zab+UvWxy · · Score: 1

      I think "Bat-Rig" would work better in dialogue.

      Also, maybe "Bat-Crusher"? "Bat-Truck" and "Bat-SUV" just sound so hokey.

      Then again, we *are* talking about Batman in the post-Schumacher era, so I'm going to hedge my bets here.

      --
      "I don't get it." -- ObviousGuy
    25. Re:I Believe.... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 2, Funny

      The first thing I thought of when I saw that picture was "Batman, bane of all rough lawns and shoddily maintained public parks in Gotham city." The thing looks like an oversized, rocket powered sit-in lawnmower!

    26. Re:I Believe.... by RedK · · Score: 1

      And Spider-Man had that real upbeat ending! And the sequel. There's never anyone crying or feeling depressed and down in that one either.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    27. Re:I Believe.... by chromaphobic · · Score: 1

      No. I deny that a Daredevil movie was ever made or released. No such creature.

    28. Re:I Believe.... by slams · · Score: 1

      The directory, Chirstopher Nolan, isn't bad either. Matter of fact, IMHO he is one of the very few directors that I consider to have extraordinary talent and creativity.

      If you found "Memento" an exceptionally interesting movie, which he directed and wrote, I think you'll agree to the above statement. To back that up even further, he also directed "Following" and "Insomnia" which where also very good. So, he has a proven track record...

      --
      -slams
    29. Re:I Believe.... by KE1LR · · Score: 2, Informative
      I read this and throught it was excellent. It's part of my permanent book collection. Miller did a great job of discarding all the corny TV crap and turning Gotham into an apocalyptic goth hellzone and Bruce Wayne into a Batman with a real deathwish. It also has some good shots at then-president Reagan in it.

      I bet it also inspired a big part of the Batman vs Superman movie that's rumored to be in the works.

      The similarity between the picture on the web site and Frank Miller's "Batmobile" are indeed striking. Perhaps Miller is on the design team for the movie?

      Batman: The Dark Knight Returns
      ISBN 1563893428
      $13.95@bn.com

    30. Re:I Believe.... by NoUse · · Score: 1

      I don't know about all the locations but I do know that some of it was filmed in Chicago.
      But it does look like Warner has decided to make this one less craptastic than the live-action cartoon that was Batman and Robin.

    31. Re:I Believe.... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Oh no.... A DECENT PLOT and people who can ACT!


      Oh come on, like that has a chance with the North American market. :-P We prefer Aflek and J-Lo thank you.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    32. Re:I Believe.... by AdrainB · · Score: 1

      Miller also wrote Batman: Year One which I think is the basis of this film. So in effect, Miller recreated both the beginning and the ending of Batman's career.

    33. Re:I Believe.... by AdrainB · · Score: 1

      But Gary Oldman is!

    34. Re:I Believe.... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      i, for one, believe michael cain will make a fine batman.
      "My name, is batman. Not a lot of people know that."
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    35. Re:I Believe.... by punkin · · Score: 0

      To the dunebuggy Gidget ... er, I mean Robin!!!

    36. Re:I Believe.... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      It's okay. He's at the helm of Alan Moore's up and coming Watchment movie, which ought to blow this Batman film out of the proverbial water.

      -9mm-

    37. Re:I Believe.... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Actually, a few bits of that turned up in Tim Burton's Batman. The Joker's smiling poison...

      Hmm. Maybe Burton cribbed it from Miller, but Miller didn't invent that. In fact, the Joker's "smiling poison" goes back to the very first Joker story in 1940. It went away when people stopped getting killed in DC comics, but has had a revival. Much of the new, "darker" Batman is really a return to his original roots.

      Chris Mattern

    38. Re:I Believe.... by tattoi.nobori · · Score: 2, Funny
      If anyone's interested, the tires on the new Batmolawntractor appear to be Super Swamper TSL/SX off-road tires, in the 44" range. They're very popular tires for hardcore rock rigs.

      Now you know. (And knowing, in this case, is halfway to redneck! ^_^)

      http://www.desertrat.com/interco/interco.htm#super _swamper_tsx

    39. Re:I Believe.... by pragma_x · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm more partial to the name Bat-le-wagon myself.

    40. Re:I Believe.... by Giggles+Of+Doom · · Score: 1

      Darker, yes, but for once you actually see the sun shining!

      --
      "A coward dies a thousand deaths, the brave but one."
    41. Re:I Believe.... by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 1

      I'm just happy to finally see a trailer that doesn't include 3/4 of the plot points of the movie. After the last day-glo sidewalk chalkfest Batman movie, I thought I would never be interested in the franchise again. This has turned my mind, a little.

    42. Re:I Believe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a wise alien once said merchandising, merchandising, merchandising!

      Isn't that supposed to be moichandising?

    43. Re:I Believe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Oh no.... A DECENT PLOT and people who can ACT!

      Oh no ... the bad guys wil be those sporting an American English accent.

    44. Re:I Believe.... by shamilton · · Score: 1

      Isn't he the one who directed that piece of shit Requiem for a Dream? Did anyone not an artsy Mac user enjoy that?

      --
      "[A] high IQ is like a Jeep; you will still get stuck, just farther from help!" --Just d' FAQs, c.g.a
    45. Re:I Believe.... by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      That's easy. SUVs are in. Big and ugly means manly. Really. It does.

      Then explain the new Batmobile's tiny rocket engine...

      I know rocket engines are powerful for their size, but this is a super-hero fiction movie. Put one of those Saturn 5 engines on the thing. 200,000lbf of thrust should be enough for good ol' Batman.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    46. Re:I Believe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh no ... the bad guys wil be those sporting an American English accent.

      uh, no. the main bad guy will be played by Ken Watanabe of "Last Samurai." therefore the villain will be sporting a Japanese accent, period. hey bad guy, can you say "lollipop"?

    47. Re:I Believe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      well, he is the one who is supported only by film students whom believe a film filled with a series of meaningless visual collage and unconventional storytelling is hip and cool. he was on board when warner announced the production of new Batman. I thought the film would suck and was going to be another nail on the coffin.

      however the reason, Aronofsky dropped from the project, and warner signed with Noran, who knows less artsy, mainstream film making with ability to direct Al Pacino. I was relieved. Warner made a right decision by dropping the artsy film school graduate and replacing that shit with Noran.

  2. what by xOleanderx · · Score: 5, Funny

    So does batman drive in the city or crunch over cars like a monster truck???

    1. Re:what by optikSmoke · · Score: 1

      So does batman drive in the city or crunch over cars like a monster truck???

      Pshaw, Batman wouldn't drive a monster truck. It is clearly a formula 1 car with oversized wheels being swallowed by a squashed tank.

    2. Re:what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Batman flies around on ropes or climbs buildings or runs around on rooftops or somthing when he's in the city. He doesn't DRIVE. That would be so... pedestrian.

      He only gets in the batmobile when he is going into assault mode!

    3. Re:what by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      Batman flies around on ropes or climbs buildings or runs around on rooftops or somthing when he's in the city. He doesn't DRIVE. That would be so... pedestrian.

      hmm, For Batman to drive in the city would be pedestrian?

      thinking....

    4. Re:what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pedestrian also means, "lacking wit or imagination," but I'm sure you knew that because you looked it up yourself. The two meanings are probably related, as I can think of no method of transportation more unimaginitive than walking.

    5. Re:what by glass_window · · Score: 1

      Of course, you think that would actually fit in one lane?

  3. It's got to be better than Catwoman by Animats · · Score: 5, Funny

    We need this, just to erase the memory.

    1. Re:It's got to be better than Catwoman by pHatidic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes and then we will need something to erase the memory of Batman. Which is why the next Warner Bros. movie will be Batman Vs. Catwoman. Only when they go for the epic battle they will get really attracted to eachother and have a love child named ManWoman. Which will be the central character of a future Hollywood blockbuster starring Janet Reno.

    2. Re:It's got to be better than Catwoman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was ausome.

    3. Re:It's got to be better than Catwoman by Shinmizu · · Score: 1

      So, is Stephen King going to play her evil twin?

    4. Re:It's got to be better than Catwoman by angryLNX · · Score: 1

      This is why Spiderman sequels come out right with crappy superhero movies. Many would have lost faith in the human race if Daredevil weren't playing at the same time Spiderman was!

    5. Re:It's got to be better than Catwoman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BatCat would be such a cooler name

    6. Re:It's got to be better than Catwoman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, how about "The Huntress"?

      Now, toodle-oo

    7. Re:It's got to be better than Catwoman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a TV show recently on WB called "Bird of Prey" that featured Batman & Catwoman's daughter: The Huntress.

    8. Re:It's got to be better than Catwoman by tbuck · · Score: 1

      And now I've got to erase the mental picture of "ManWoman". Ewwwwwwww... (She would make one hell of a villian, though.)

    9. Re:It's got to be better than Catwoman by gunnarstahl · · Score: 1

      [...] have a love child named ManWoman. Which will be the central[...]
      Maybe this will be the first usable manpage for explaining women....

      ---Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain, or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.

    10. Re:It's got to be better than Catwoman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought turning down the title role was the worst move in Ashley Judd's career, but now it looks like a stroke of genius. The script smelled of fresh poo.

      How come scriptwrites are in low regards in Hollywood? We need the good ones, not the producer demanding multiple rewrites by mediocre hacks.

      So what we need is a real script, then just strip Ashley Judd, dip her into rubber and ... Whoa! Hold that rubber for just a minute...

    11. Re:It's got to be better than Catwoman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and have a love child named ManWoman.

      I'd like to think if Batman and Catwoman had a child it would be called BatCat. That would make for an interesting pet/superhero...

  4. Hmm by DesiGuy421 · · Score: 0, Troll

    too lazy to read article. If George Clooney is batman, god help us all.

  5. b0rked in firefox by Magila · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apparently the trailer link doesn't work in firefox, here's a direct link to save you the trouble: http://raincloud.warnerbros.com/wbmovies/batmanbeg ins/teaser/teaser_hi_a.mov

    1. Re:b0rked in firefox by mrycar · · Score: 1

      Worked on firefox with my Mac, will see if it works on the PC version.

      --
      Gator/Claria is Spyware.
    2. Re:b0rked in firefox by Arcticfox24 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The trailer works just fine in Firefox, you just need to allow the site to open popups.

    3. Re:b0rked in firefox by Omega1045 · · Score: 1

      I noticed this is mov. What do you recommend to view mov (or other Quicktime) on Linux?

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    4. Re:b0rked in firefox by cranos · · Score: 1

      Had no trouble with Mozilla 1.5 and the mplayer plugin.

    5. Re:b0rked in firefox by bach37 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quicktime and wma codecs for mplayer here.

    6. Re:b0rked in firefox by pllewis · · Score: 1

      firefox on mandrake 10 with the latest realplayer plugin worked for me.

    7. Re:b0rked in firefox by Omega1045 · · Score: 1

      sweet. Doing an emerge on mplayer now, will get these next.

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    8. Re:b0rked in firefox by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Mplayer for Gentoo automatically grabs every damn codec on the planet - just do:

      mplayer videos_name.whatever

      at a command prompt and I guarantee it will play.

      Derek

    9. Re:b0rked in firefox by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1

      Apparently the trailer link doesn't work in firefox, here's a direct link to save you the trouble: http://raincloud.warnerbros.com/wbmovies/batmanbeg ins/teaser/teaser_hi_a.mov

      Or

      http://pdl.warnerbros.com/wbmovies/batmanbegins/te aser/teaser_hi_a.mov

      which is the link contained in the xml file you linked to.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    10. Re:b0rked in firefox by Omega1045 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Doesn't play.

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    11. Re:b0rked in firefox by VertigoAce · · Score: 1

      Similarly, it doesn't work with Internet Explorer if you're using XP SP2. Right click on the popup blocked icon and you can temporarily allow popups.

    12. Re:b0rked in firefox by Omega1045 · · Score: 1

      Might be wrong, but those all look like Mac and Windows Codecs.

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    13. Re:b0rked in firefox by rpdillon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just for the sake of rigor:

      I use gentoo on amd64 and NONE of the 32 bit windows codecs work. Emerge does nothing. Similarly with Firefox and ANY 3rd party plugins. So I have to go 32-bit binary when available and basically run two copies of things like Firefox (32 and 64) and MPlayer...if only I could get my hands on Mplayer in binary form for x86...

      Crossover Office works well though... =)

    14. Re:b0rked in firefox by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    15. Re:b0rked in firefox by bach37 · · Score: 1

      I think Linux users want the "essentials" file on there. Sorry it's been a bit since I set these up.

    16. Re:b0rked in firefox by falser · · Score: 1

      What are popups?

      (me love mozilla long time)

  6. Robin? by strike2867 · · Score: 2

    Is the plot going to be anything like The Ambiguously Gay Duo.

    And BTW trailer didn't work in Mozilla had to use IE to open it.

    --

    Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    1. Re:Robin? by ztirffritz · · Score: 1

      Works fine with Camino.

      --
      Why doesn't anything interesting happen when I have mod points?
    2. Re:Robin? by DumbWhiteGuy777 · · Score: 1

      You've gotta allow popups for that site, then it works. It's a javascript pop-up, like most of the bad kind.

    3. Re:Robin? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      worked for me. Mozilla 1.7

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Robin? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > Is the plot going to be anything like The Ambiguously Gay Duo.

      No, they apparently have kicked Schumacher out, thank God.

      Chris Mattern

  7. BatMan's SUV by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    or Monster Truck or ATV.

    Watch him get protested by the Moms of Gotham for driving something that has a 1 to 1 mile/gallon usage ratio.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:BatMan's SUV by csplinter · · Score: 0

      Yea, is it just me or did the batmobile get slightly gayer.

    2. Re:BatMan's SUV by nbvb · · Score: 3, Funny


      1 highway, 0 city.
      </Wolfcastle>

    3. Re:BatMan's SUV by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      He's Bruce Wane, he's like the richest person in the world ^W^W Gotham! what's wrong with paying $30 just to get into the city?

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    4. Re:BatMan's SUV by Fr0mZer0 · · Score: 1

      Considering that the batmobiles from the movies and tv show had a rocket built into them you'd think that going to an SUV would be cheaper. After all how much is jet feul going for these days?

    5. Re:BatMan's SUV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you only got gayer

    6. Re:BatMan's SUV by Gunfighter · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't tell in the photo because of the angle, but I think this Batmobile looks like it may have a gun rack in the back window, a half-empty pouch of chewing tobacco on the dash, and a bumper sticker that reads something along the lines of "American by birth, Southern by the grace of God". In addition, I'm pretty sure those tires were purchased at Fred's Truk Emporium. You know... the place out by where the old pond used to be before they moved the Super WAL*MART.

      --
      -- Stu

      /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
    7. Re:BatMan's SUV by jsahol · · Score: 1

      Those tire are Super Swampers, which I run on my Jeep, which does NOT have a gun rack :) I likes this batmobile.

    8. Re:BatMan's SUV by Finuvir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Batman doesn't even own *a* gun, let alone many guns that would necessitate an entire rack.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    9. Re:BatMan's SUV by Bedouin+X · · Score: 1

      He had a shotgun in The Dark Knight Returns, but it didn't shoot bullets.

      --
      Dissolve... Resolve... Evolve...
  8. Now if only by foidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    someone would stop stealing Batman's water!
    (I will add anyone who gets the reference and posts about it to my friends list, yeah, crappy prize. you wanna fight about it?)

    1. Re:Now if only by TheAlmightyQ · · Score: 1

      Well he is a man who loves his taffy.

      (It's not off-topic, honestly)

      --
      I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
    2. Re:Now if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mayor Adam West from Family Guy but posted anonymously because I don't need no stinkin' friends.

    3. Re:Now if only by TechnoPops · · Score: 1

      And while that may be newsworthy, the REAL story is that Luke Perry's gay.

      (Oh, don't kid yourself. This is SO off-topic. :P)

      --
      "Each time you smile, it'll only last awhile. Life may be scary, but it's only temporary."
    4. Re:Now if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.planet-familyguy.com/episodes/capsule.p hp?id=2ACX14

    5. Re:Now if only by UWC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mayor Adam West is the best part of Family Guy.

    6. Re:Now if only by paulschroeder · · Score: 1

      Mayor Adam West. He doesn't do interviews, however.

    7. Re:Now if only by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1

      And the best part of Mayor Adam West is that Adam West actually voiced it himself...

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    8. Re:Now if only by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      (to left hand) "You had your chance!"

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    9. Re:Now if only by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      Noone interviews Adam West!

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    10. Re:Now if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right. Adam West would never make himself the butt of the joke on television.

    11. Re:Now if only by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1

      How do you know my language?!? Are you Sara Conner?

    12. Re:Now if only by schnits0r · · Score: 1

      Family guy! That was great!

    13. Re:Now if only by grantls · · Score: 0

      So, if I do this, will you stop stealing my water? Ummm.... yeah...

    14. Re:Now if only by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, right. Adam West would never make himself the butt of the joke on television.
      Some people have a sense of humor.
      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    15. Re:Now if only by Fryboy · · Score: 1

      Damned if he doesn't love his taffy!

    16. Re:Now if only by Jacer · · Score: 1

      My personal favorite thing about The Family Guy was always "How old did you say? 16? 18? ALRIGHT!"

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    17. Re:Now if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, right. Adam West would never make himself the butt of the joke on television.

      Some people have a sense of humor.

      And did you know that "sarcasm" isn't listed in the dictionary?

    18. Re:Now if only by TheCyko1 · · Score: 1

      It would be great if Adam West made a cameo in this movie. Something small, like how Stan Lee always pops up in Marvel movies.

      --
      This message was brought to you by the death of 30 brain cells.
    19. Re:Now if only by xombo · · Score: 1

      Family Guy, duh. It's the Episode where Meg's story about Adam West gets replaced with Peter's story about how Luke Perry is gay.

    20. Re:Now if only by OakLEE · · Score: 1

      And I'm a man that likes his taffy!

      ____________

      --
      The sun beams down on a brand new day, No more welfare tax to pay, Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light...
    21. Re:Now if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! Usually my malcontents are skinnier. Will you come back next week when my fat malcontent trap will be completed?

    22. Re:Now if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mommmmmm!
      Heh, I like where this is going!

    23. Re:Now if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. A thousand times no.

      Do we really want a Batman and Luke Perry gay love scene?

    24. Re:Now if only by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes yes, Adam West is the mayor on Family Guy. :-)

      Doctor: Mayor West, you have Lymphoma.

      Mayor: Oh My.

      Doctor: Probably from rolling around in that Toxic waste. What in God's name were you trying to prove?

      Mayor: I was trying to gain super powers.

      Doctor: Well that's just silly.

      Mayor: Silly yes ... Idiotic ... yes.

    25. Re:Now if only by pinopino · · Score: 1

      Just blame it on Arthur.
      Now if only they made a Tick movie....

      --
      "What the masochist doesn't know can't hurt him."
    26. Re:Now if only by DanthemaninVA1 · · Score: 1

      Family Guy, where Adam West is the voice of the mayor, and Meg writes about the scandal in which the mayor thinks his water is being stolen by the drain, potted plants, etc., and spends taxpayer money to fund an investigation.

  9. Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by mrycar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At least it appears to have real Actors in the Cast. Can never be disappointed by Morgon Freeman, Michael Caine, Liam Neeson, or Gary Oldman.

    Looks interesting and at least worthwhile to watch.

    --
    Gator/Claria is Spyware.
    1. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Christian Bale!

    2. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can never be disappointed by Morgon Freeman, Michael Caine, Liam Neeson, or Gary Oldman.

      Oh no, certainly not. Oh wait...

      • Morgan Freeman: Deep Impact
      • Michael Caine: Blame it on Rio
      • Liam Neeson: The Phantom Menance
      • Gary Oldman: The Scarlet Letter

      What was your point again?

    3. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by fodder69 · · Score: 1

      Cristian Bale is actually Batman, and he was pretty solid in a not half bad sci-fi movie, Equilibrium. Worth a watch for the Slashdot crowd. Some Matrix derivitave kung fu type stuff that didn't go very far, but a lot better movie than I expected and Christian Bale was pretty good, although the role didn't require much emotion, I think of the way many stars can botch whatever they do.

    4. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think I saw your last movie. Oh, wait...

    5. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that good actors really can't break free of a bad script, poor casting or poor direction. Sometimes a good actor can rise above the circumstances but better results come from all four being right rather than having to "swim upstream".

    6. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Morgan Freeman: Deep Impact

      Don't forget Bonfire of the Vanities...

      * Michael Caine: Blame it on Rio

      Oh, God. Let's see... The Stallone remake of Get Carter, Jaws: The Revenge, The Muppet Christmas Carol...

      * Liam Neeson: The Phantom Menance

      The Haunting, Next of Kin, Nell and... Krull?

      * Gary Oldman: The Scarlet Letter

      The Fifth Element, Dracula, Lost in Space...

      But you forget the worst movie that they'll all be in... "Batman Begins."

    7. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by nucrash · · Score: 1

      I am in total agreement, also keep in mind the director has a short but impressive resume with "Momento"

      Even though this will probably lead to the eventual type-casting of Christian Bale, I think that with his previous performances including "American Psycho" and "Equilibrium," he is an excellent choice to dawn the cape of batman.

      Besides, everyone knows that even though George Clooney was a terrible Batman, the real fault with the franchise was the director and his half-cocked illusions of what the batman franchise should be.
      i.e. Batman was never to have a since of humor among other things such as a whiny Robin.

      The only real fail points happen to be, the producer, the writer, and the chemistry between such big name actors. By big name actors, I also include Katie Holmes, because even though not as established, for her age, she does have quite the reputation building.

      --
      Place something witty here
    8. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And pretty heart-wrenching in "Empire of the Sun". Good to see child actors who actually make it onto real careers :)

    9. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Rallion · · Score: 1

      The writer did some bad stuff, that's clear/ But he also did Dark City, which is in many ways very similar to what this movie (IMO, of course) should be, and is really quite good, I think.

      Some of the other stuff on his resume scares me a little, but none of it (that I saw, at least) was all that terrible.

    10. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Also keep in mind that a lot of great actors, particularly British ones, as far as I can see, tend to be very reluctant to sign on to movies with bad scripts. And from what I know of the characters, the casting is quite good, as long as they're like the old versions. And the director seems talented enough to me (Memento). Indeed. High hopes, high hopes.

    11. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fifth Element? What the hell are you talking about? That movie was good.

    12. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Also keep in mind that a lot of great actors, particularly British ones, as far as I can see, tend to be very reluctant to sign on to movies with bad scripts.
      Ahem:
      "I have never seen it (Jaws 4) but by all accounts it is terrible. However, I have seen the house that it built and it is terrific."
      - the next Alfred (Sir Michael Caine), explaining his rationale for acting in Jaws 4.
    13. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Brakz0rz · · Score: 1

      o/t but I always notice that 5th element has a real love hate thing goin on... i personally think it was a piece of garbage but a surprising number of people seem to like it... then again a surprising number of people like pro wrestling....

      --
      "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot
    14. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Rallion · · Score: 1

      I didn't mention Caine specifically. He's good, but he seems to just do whatever seems fun when it comes to roles. That's the impression that I got from some Goldmember-related interviews.

    15. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Well, which great British actor from "Batman Begins" did you have in mind?

    16. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "At least it appears to have real Actors in the Cast. Can never be disappointed by Morgon Freeman, Michael Caine, Liam Neeson, or Gary Oldman."

      Yeah, they should kick Tommy Lee Jones's ass!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    17. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      Well, how about Christian Bale, Gary Oldman, and Tom Wilkinson?

      Those are all great actors, as is Liam Neeson, who, though not technically British, is still a resident of the United Kingdom, which is the same thing in the minds of most USians.

    18. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by LS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Never disappointed? Ummmmmm, let's see

      Morgan Freeman - Deep Impact
      Michael Caine - Jaws: The Revenge
      Liam Neeson - Star Wars: The Phantom Menace
      Gary Oldman - Tiptoes

      I've seen plenty of movies with all-star casts that bombed. Let's reserve our judgement until we actually see the flick...

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    19. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Can never be disappointed by ... Michael Caine

      Yes, his career is a testament to the fact that you can easily get away with playing the same character in every film and no-one will ever notice.

    20. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Some Matrix derivitave kung fu type stuff that didn't go very far,

      What, you mean like Matrix 2 and 3?

    21. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's good, but he seems to just do whatever seems fun when it comes to roles.

      Caine is an actor. He acts for a living. So when someone offers him a job he will not turn it down. It's a working-class thing...

      He's said as much in interviews.

    22. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I watched Equilibrium and it is better than Matrix simply because there is no 2 and 3 bullshit. The story is simple and complete.

    23. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Marsala · · Score: 1

      Morgan Freeman - Dreamcatcher
      Michael Caine - Get Carter
      Liam Neeson - Krull
      Gary Oldman - Lost in Space

      Never say "never". Or "octothorpe". Because some geek on slashdot will always try to prove you wrong on the former, and 99.32% of the people in the world won't have any idea of what you're talking about in the case of the latter.

      But yer right... I think this film looks promising. :)

    24. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Exactly. I watched Equilibrium and it is better than Matrix simply because
      > there is no 2 and 3 bullshit. The story is simple and complete.

      I wouldn't say that. The Matrix is a great film and requires no sequels to understand it.

    25. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did see Episode 1 right?

    26. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Mant · · Score: 1

      Funny, reviewing bad movies for my friends webiste I've noticed the exact opposite. Brit actors will work in complete shite. For some reason, it doesn't damage their reputation, probably becuase they also go and do things like Shakespear plays, and are regarded as actors, not movie stars.

      They come pretty cheap too, for the talent, so some relative low budget stuff can afford them.

    27. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me but, Krull was not terrible, especially when compared to say Phantom Menace, which showed just how poorly Liam Neeson can act.

    28. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by rho · · Score: 1

      Krull rocked, you ass.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    29. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by TaliesinWI · · Score: 1

      Michael Caine has said in interviews that he took whatever came along earlier in his career so he could be more choosy later in it. Now I'm not entirely sure he's following that to the letter, but he does seem to have had a better nose for projects lately.

      Of course, you could always look at it like Vincent Price did when asked why he was in so many bad movies - "I'm an actor, my job is to act."

    30. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      I respect the acting talents of the actors you mentioned. However, even the best can make some stinkers:
      Morgan Freeman: Chain Reaction
      Michael Caine: Miss Congeniality
      Liam Neeson: Star Wars Episode 1
      Gary Oldman: Lost in Space
      Admittedly, they generally do pick good movies, but even the best actors can't salvage a bad script / bad directing.

    31. Re:Chock full of Real Name Brand Actors by Ricardo+Lima · · Score: 1

      Yes. The Matrix movies are just like Highlander:

      There can be only one!

      --
      Ricardo da Silva Lima
  10. Return to Dark by cranos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At least from what little I could see on the trailer they are returning the movies back to the Dark Crusader model.

    The first two movies with Micheal Keaton were pretty good, but Val Kilmer and George Clooney pretty much killed off any interest I had in the movie franchise.

    1. Re:Return to Dark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It wasn't so much Kilmer or Clooney as it was Joel Schumacher.

    2. Re:Return to Dark by ddsoul · · Score: 1

      I really didn't have much problem with Val Kilmer... or George Clooney... but when they have villians being played by the most unlikely actors... (arnie as dr. freeze???? what were they thinking??) and then throwing in batgirl??? as WELL as another villian?? oh my god... I'm surprised they didn't bring the joker back!

      --
      *604x
    3. Re:Return to Dark by cranos · · Score: 1

      After the Dark Crusader atmosphere set by Tim Burton/Micheal Keaton/Jack Nicholson/Danny Devito the next two movies really did suck the big one. Too much zing and zang not enough brooding.

      George Clooney proved beyond a doubt that he cannot do dark, brooding and border line psychotic.

    4. Re:Return to Dark by ddsoul · · Score: 1

      ... we all know keaton will always be the original (yes, even moreso than adam west).. which is why I believe Christian Bale *can* do it, afterall, he was the american psycho... and please... no more robin, he was never cool anyways!

      --
      *604x
    5. Re:Return to Dark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you say pretty good, keep in mind that the first Batman was (more than anything else) responsible for the cornucopia of comic book movies since then.

    6. Re:Return to Dark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Bah! Having read The Dark Knight Returns I can say that even the Michael Keaton movies were CRAP!

      Personally, I would make the graphic novel into a movie casting Clint Eastwood as the old Batman and Mic Jagger as the old Joker.

      Yeah, yeah, I know. This is what I say anytime someone brings up Batman films.

    7. Re:Return to Dark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good god, stop reading my mind. You're creeping me out.

    8. Re:Return to Dark by graikor · · Score: 2, Insightful
      George Clooney proved beyond a doubt that he cannot do dark, brooding and border line psychotic.

      I thought he proved that he could do a credible job at exactly that in "From Dusk 'Til Dawn". I place the blame for "Batman and Robin" squarely on the shoulders of Joel Schumacher and Akiva Goldsman. Clooney shouldn't be held responsible for being unable to turn a turd into gold.
  11. Qui-Gon? by phalse+phace · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why is Qui-Gon Jinn in batman?

    1. Re:Qui-Gon? by Mag7 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, as long as they don't have Jar Jar as Robin.

    2. Re:Qui-Gon? by cranos · · Score: 1

      I'm actually hoping that Jar Jar is the Second Robin, you know the one who gets beaten to a pulp by the Joker and the blown up.

    3. Re:Qui-Gon? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Why is Qui-Gon Jinn in batman?"

      Well, his Star Wars career was cut pretty short.

      (*sigh* This might have been worth a +1 Funny if we were talking about Darth Maul.)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Qui-Gon? by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Even that would not be as painful as hearing Arnold saying his Dr. Freeze battlecry: "It's time to kick some FREEZE!" *shudder* *curls up into a little ball and hides from the cruel, cruel world*

  12. How to make the new batmobile by British · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mix equal parts:

    F-1 race car

    Military troop carrier

    I think it's a neat variation. It's better than the all-too-flashy neon light decorated batmobile in the last movie. That seemed more like a showcar than a "fight the bad guys" vehicle. The Batmobile from the first movie was a well-done machine.

    I don't see the justification in jet engines though for the previous vehicles. But with all the torque you would need on the big tires on the new one, perhaps the engine is justified.

    1. Re:How to make the new batmobile by cvas · · Score: 1

      **Possible spolier info below**

      If you consider features of the vehicle as spoilers. Supposedly the new batmobile works, and is able to jump 40ft when it gets up to 220/mph.

      Article on a showing.

    2. Re:How to make the new batmobile by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Military troop carrier

      IMO, some of the coolest vehicules were the marines' air and land transport things in Aliens. And maybe that tank-like thing from UFO.

    3. Re:How to make the new batmobile by TheDredd · · Score: 1

      At least Batman won't have any problems plowing the land with the new bat-tracktormobile.

      And when he gets real lonely he can always use that jet outlet to keep him satisfied

    4. Re:How to make the new batmobile by sava · · Score: 1

      Batman is definately going to kill bad guys in laughing with his brand new BatBehemoth.

      --
      //SaVa
  13. A direct link by stienman · · Score: 3, Informative

    A direct link to the windows media 500k.

    -Adam

  14. The Batmobile became an SUV! by lwagner · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would think, with the Batman franchise continuing on into an eco-crazy millenium, Batman wouldn't convert the Batmobile into an dually-wheeled SUV! How about at least a Bat-hybrid?!

    But then again, what do I know -- he's got a fire-breathing mega-engine on the back of that... and that's DEFINITELY not environmentally friendly.

    1. Re:The Batmobile became an SUV! by Mag7 · · Score: 1

      I would think, with the Batman franchise continuing on into an eco-crazy millenium, Batman wouldn't convert the Batmobile into an dually-wheeled SUV! How about at least a Bat-hybrid?!

      But then again, what do I know -- he's got a fire-breathing mega-engine on the back of that... and that's DEFINITELY not environmentally friendly.


      If he was really an environmentally conscious super-hero, he'd take the bus!

    2. Re:The Batmobile became an SUV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's got a pink fire-breathing mega-engine on the back of that ...

      Fixed that for ya. Since they've decided to meld Batman with The Fast and the Furious it only appropriate that he has pink fire coming out the back. Also, if you look closely, the Batmobile has a NOS sticker on the side. It also has an underbody kit, but it black lighting (:-P) so you can't see it.

    3. Re:The Batmobile became an SUV! by servognome · · Score: 1

      Bah, they should just completely ghetto his car and slap big "Type R" and "Honda Motorsports" stickers, with the "Grass, Ass, or Cash" license plate frame, give it a 5 foot spoiler, and some green neon underneath.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    4. Re:The Batmobile became an SUV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not an engine, that's the ultra ricer +300HP "muffler".

    5. Re:The Batmobile became an SUV! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      You are sadly mistaken. Batman is taking this opportunity to partner with Hummer for the Batmobile as they are set to release a new model which has rockets in the back, and has mileage of a cool 5 gal/mile. And no, that wasn't a typo.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    6. Re:The Batmobile became an SUV! by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      No I think they already went that way...

    7. Re:The Batmobile became an SUV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's got a fire-breathing mega-engine on the back of that... and that's DEFINITELY not environmentally friendly.

      Holy alternative fuels, Batman. It's powered by...

      >GUANO!<

    8. Re:The Batmobile became an SUV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then again, what do I know -- he's got a fire-breathing mega-engine on the back of that... and that's DEFINITELY not environmentally friendly.

      Yeah, anything which tends to set the environment on fire doesn't really qualify as "green transportation".

    9. Re:The Batmobile became an SUV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to see Batman driving a re-vamped Yugo with a turbo charger and nitrous....now that would be funny!

    10. Re:The Batmobile became an SUV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot all the ICE he needs like a few LCD's displaying porn, and a silly CD changer that has dolphins that turn into a yin-yang and vice versa.
      And a pair of fuzzy dice.

    11. Re:The Batmobile became an SUV! by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
      I would think, with the Batman franchise continuing on into an eco-crazy millenium, Batman wouldn't convert the Batmobile into an dually-wheeled SUV! How about at least a Bat-hybrid?!

      I like it. I think it makes sense for Batman to be driving around in a defacto urban tank. C'mon, do you really want to see Batman in a Mini? be serious!

  15. Re:Batmobile Runs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew there had to be some reason....

  16. Something else to warm up with... by Kristoffer+Lunden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.theforce.net/theater/shortfilms/batman_ deadend/

    Fan movie with a pretty nice story twist. Also, the Joker has never been better on film. ;-)

    1. Re:Something else to warm up with... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Very nice.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:Something else to warm up with... by jbrandon · · Score: 1

      It sux0r, but at least it features Andrew Koenig

    3. Re:Something else to warm up with... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Not bad! It will probably be better than Alien vs. Predator movie!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  17. another comic by XMichael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After seeing Cat woman, I'm scared to even bother looking at this! Man ohh man was that Cat woman film ever bad! How ... how on earth did they forget to add a plot?

    xoduszero

    1. Re:another comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How ... how on earth did they forget to add a plot?


      Question really should be...
      Why on earth did you go to see catwomen?
    2. Re:another comic by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      They were too busy staring at Haley Barry?

    3. Re:another comic by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      how on earth did they forget to add a plot?

      It had a plot. It was the struggle of a timid woman facing the harsh reality of the cooperate world, a reality that men are openly bastards and women are more subtle but are better at it. It's the age all tale of girl meets boy, girl goes to meet boss, girl discovers bosses wife's evil plot, boss's wife shoves girl down the drain, girl becomes cat, girl gets fired, cat gets framed, girl gets boy, boy becomes cop, girl meets bosses wife, bosses wife plays innocent, bosses wife kills husband and frames cat, boy discovers cat is girl, girl escapes from jail, girl vindicates her self, girl kills bosses wife, girl gets boy again, but girl discovers her own independence, and boy loses girl. It's a classic classic tale.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:another comic by Captain+Nick · · Score: 1

      Good point. Man WB really can't put out a good original movie can they? Yeah Harry Potter, but the books sold that, Troy was lackluster, and basically everything else was a failure. Hell, Sony got the comic book genre right with Spiderman, but for some reason WB just seems to fuck up all these 'sittin right on your plate' concepts. And for Batman, I hope it's not another Catwoman!

    5. Re:another comic by ine8181 · · Score: 1

      Beautifully put. Like, wow.

    6. Re:another comic by ElvenMonkey · · Score: 1

      Wow.. a complete plot synopsis in a paragraph.
      Thank you for saving me from having to sit through that crap stretched out over an hour and a half!

      --
      "Joy is not in things; it is in us." Richard Wagner
    7. Re:another comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...girl dies in a tragic blimp accident over the Orange Bowl on New Year's Day" "Goodyear?" "No, the worst."

    8. Re:another comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the director was too busy screwing her to notice the crap he was filming?

    9. Re:another comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Halle's Berries, don't you?

    10. Re:another comic by Max+Nugget · · Score: 1

      After seeing Cat woman, I'm scared to even bother looking at this! Man ohh man was that Cat woman film ever bad! How ... how on earth did they forget to add a plot? Interestingly, Batman Begins will be good for the same reason Catwoman was an atrocity: WB took a hands-off approach and let "Pitof" (the French director of Catwoman) do the movie just as he wanted to. Similarly, when Batman Begins comes out, it will be the vision of Christopher Nolan and David Goyer, without WB's traditional meddling. And trust me, it's quite a vision. The pessism about a new Batman film is understandable, given how bad the first four films were (many feel Burton's films were good but I'm not one of them). But you have to keep in mind that you're unfairly judging this new film by your opinions on films that are by completely different people. You're drawing premature conclusions about the work of one artist based on the work of other, unrelated artists. I suppose that some of you just aren't going to believe in this film until you see it for yourself next summer, but I urge you to keep an open mind. If you thought Spiderman 2 was good (or didn't)...this film is going to blow it out of the water.

    11. Re:another comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or at least that's what they said on "Oprah"

  18. This movie.... by Jim+Starx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .. is looking good. After the neon light infected monstrocities that were the last two batman movies, it's good to see the idea of it all back on track.

    --
    The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
  19. Obviously... by dj245 · · Score: 1

    The prop designers all drive SUV's and go to mud runs every weekend.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  20. heheheh by Grey_14 · · Score: 3, Informative

    They Will hate me for this but... Linky Linky :D Thats a direct link to the movie on their site, no crappy redirects and embedded junk, I used wget :D

    1. Re:heheheh by geekoid · · Score: 1

      thank you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  21. What the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is that?
    No really.. what the hell? At first I thought this was a joke. Since when does Batman cruise around in a APC/Tank type deal?

    Oh and does anyone else thing that the guy on page03 looks like Max Payne.. is he batman?

  22. new batmobile by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1

    everyone's got an SUV these days.

  23. Staring Mel Gibson as Bat-Man? by Dr.Altaica · · Score: 5, Funny

    I allways figured Gotham was located in one of the orginal 13 states of the USA. But I can't think of anything that proves it isn't located in a post nuclear apocalyptic Australian.

    1. Re:Staring Mel Gibson as Bat-Man? by IronMagnus · · Score: 1

      Maybe the person doing the webpage got the wrong photo and those pics are actually for this upcomming movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0345292/

    2. Re:Staring Mel Gibson as Bat-Man? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Look Gotham up in your Fink and Wangnals. It is a tounge in cheek name for NYC. NYC newspaper reporters have often refered to the city as Gotham.

    3. Re:Staring Mel Gibson as Bat-Man? by Op7imus_Prim3 · · Score: 0
      But I can't think of anything that proves it isn't located in a post nuclear apocalyptic Australian.

      The fact that your Australian would have to be pretty fucking huge (which may have been caused by the nuclear attack, granted), or that Gotham would have to be pretty fucking tiny proves fairly conclusively that it isn't located inside any kind of Australian.

  24. NOOOO! by nathanblazted · · Score: 1

    WHAT DID THEY DO TO THE BATMOBILE?????

    That is one nasty looking car... err mobile...

    1. Re:NOOOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Batman:The Road Warrior

  25. Direct Link by sgtsanity · · Score: 5, Informative

    And here's an even more direct link that so you can all download the trailer to your computer. http://pdl.warnerbros.com/wbmovies/batmanbegins/te aser/teaser_hi_a.mov Now will this increase the slashdotting, or decrease it?

    1. Re:Direct Link by baximus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or you could get it from PlanetMirror, now couldn't you? :-)

  26. You think that Batmobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    is cool? Check this out.

    Nothing says cool like a Batmobile designed by Giger!

    p.s. I would have loved to see him design a Batman costume.

    1. Re:You think that Batmobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was meant to be a +1 funny wasn't it?

    2. Re:You think that Batmobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy Jagged Dildo of Death! Yeah, that's Giger.

    3. Re:You think that Batmobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as I like Giger's work and all the stuff he did for Alien and whatnot, that batmobile is horrible.

    4. Re:You think that Batmobile by junglee_iitk · · Score: 1

      where were the tires?

    5. Re:You think that Batmobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like a concept for a batmobile for Batman Beyond kinda has the same shape as the one in the cartoon

    6. Re:You think that Batmobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word to that... I can't even tell what the fuck it is.

      I can see turrets, but it looks like... a giant snake and nothing at all like a vehicle.

  27. Re:SUV by pllewis · · Score: 5, Funny

    See, even the do good Batman drives an SUV. I'm going out to get a Hummer tomorrow.

  28. Gotham city by NightWulf · · Score: 4, Informative

    I belive Gotham City is the comic book version of New York City. In fact NYC used to be called Gotham. On a side note, I believe comic book Metropolis was based on Chicago.

    1. Re:Gotham city by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      No, Metropolis was basically Manhattan south of 57th and the Upper West Side. Gotham was Morningside Heights and up.

      --

      I write in my journal
    2. Re:Gotham city by ct.smith · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think Metropolis is essentially Toronto, properly Americanised for American readers. If it wasn't obvious to you, take the effort to find out which country the creators of Superman are from.

      As for Gotham, I think it was Denis O'Neil (long-time editor of Batman titles) wrote that Gotham was always intended to be the worst part of Manhattan in the middle of a November night.

      --
      ** Sig-a-licious **
    3. Re:Gotham city by jtdennis · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Jerry Siegel Born in 1914 in Cleveland, Ohio,

      Joseph Shuster was born in 1914 in Toronto, Canada. When he was nine, his family moved to Cleveland, Ohio, where Shuster met young Jerry Siegel."
      curtesy of http://superman.ws/superman-comics/

      So you're half right. In the DC Universe Gotham and Metropolis are both equally New York.

      --
      -- "Freedom is the right of all sentient beings" -Optimus Prime
    4. Re:Gotham city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      More specifically...

      "It has been said that, metaphoricaly, Metropolis (home to Superman) is New York during the day, and Gotham is New York at night. This comparison is helped by the fact that Metropolis is more often seen during the day, and Gotham more at night. Longtime Batman writer and editor Dennis O'Neil has also said figuratively that Metropolis is New York above 14th St., and that Gotham City is New York below 14th St."

      Courtesy Wikipedia.

    5. Re:Gotham city by abreauj · · Score: 1
      I belive Gotham City is the comic book version of New York City. In fact NYC used to be called Gotham. On a side note, I believe comic book Metropolis was based on Chicago.

      I recall hearing a writer from DC Comics giving a talk at a convention, back when I was in high school. He said that Gotham City was indeed a parallel-universe New York City, and that Metropolis was a parallel-universe Detroit.

    6. Re:Gotham city by frankmu · · Score: 1

      i figured "beyond thunderdome"would be more appropriate for Detroit

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    7. Re:Gotham city by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      So you're half right. In the DC Universe Gotham and Metropolis are both equally New York.

      But Batman lives in the USA, and has BEEN to New York city. He punched out Kingpin on top of the Statue of Liberty...

      Gotham City must be north of there, because it's only a short drive to Arkham, which is firmly in Massachusetts.

    8. Re:Gotham city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's as follows:

      Metropolis == New York City during the day
      Gotham City == New York City as night

    9. Re:Gotham city by evilskull · · Score: 1

      Ahem, Arkham MA is not the same as Arkham Asylum. Arkham Asylum is outside of Gotham, but was named after a man, not a town. Metropolis and Gotham are both on the eastern seaboard, so that rules out every single land-locked North American city you care to name. They both started out as NYC, specifically Manhattan, but as time moved on and comics became more sophisticated, the cities gained lives of their own, so much so that neither bares any resemblance to the cities of origin any more. They have never stated exactly which state these cities are located in for the sole reason that it doesn't do anything to enhance the stories told. In ElseWorlds, whenever it would have made a difference, an established city in an established state was used, else they kept it deliberately vauge. Little details like that don't enhance or add anything to the story except geek bragging rights, and a good writer knows that sometimes every single little detail doesn't need to be spelled out. If you (the global you, not the personal you) read something other than Dan Brown books you'd appreciate the parts left out as much as the parts thrown in. Thus concludes my comic-shop rant. I'm going to bed.

    10. Re:Gotham city by Mark+Steyn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's far from canonical, but Frank Millar is reported to have once said that Metropolis is New York by day, and Gotham is New York by night.

    11. Re:Gotham city by Ty_Webb · · Score: 1

      - this is right, the day/night thing. they're both NYC. gotham (batman) is NYC by night, metropolis (superman) is NYC by day. look at the comics. batman operates at night, superman flies around with the sun.

    12. Re:Gotham city by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Arkham Asylum is outside of Gotham, but was named after a man, not a town.

      That's how DC's lawyer's declared it to be, after noticing that HP Lovecraft hadn't actually been dead quite long enough to fall into public domain.

      Metropolis and Gotham are both on the eastern seaboard,

      Some global-map computer monitors glimpsed in assorted comics (JLA I suppose) have sometimes shown Gotham more inland, or around the Mississippi delta.

    13. Re:Gotham city by mblase · · Score: 1

      On a side note, I believe comic book Metropolis was based on Chicago.

      Actually, Metropolis was based on NYC during the day, and Gotham City on NYC at night.

    14. Re:Gotham city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think metropolis is NYC in the day and gotham is NYC at night... i'm so clever

    15. Re:Gotham city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, Gotham City is supposed to be situated midway between Washington DC and NYC.

    16. Re:Gotham city by evilskull · · Score: 1

      I will concede both these points but Gotham is obviously on a large body of water that is linked to the ocean as it has a healthy shipping industry from its seedy docks. I guess that is the point I was trying to make, due to people suggesting it is supposed to be one of those land-locked cities.

      Also, I tend to go with Morrisons "Arkham Asylum" one-shot when refering to the origin of the Asylum, even if it is ret-con, just because the book was so damned good.

      Why are any of us even hashing this out?

  29. The Only Batman I want to see is by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    Fank Miller the Dark Knight Returns and a Bentley Continental GT as the BatMobile.
    Of Course I'll Play Robbin :)

  30. Release Day by Tolwyn_993442 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should release the movie on a Sunday SUNDAY SUNDAY!!

    1. Re:Release Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sunday Sunday Someday!!!

      Awex0mecross!!!

    2. Re:Release Day by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      The one, the only, BATMAN! High-flying stunts and TOTAL DESTRUCTION! You pay for the whole seat but you'll only need the edge!

    3. Re:Release Day by scratchbuild · · Score: 1

      Remember to: STICK around...

      AFTER the CREDITS....

      For a FREE....

      PERFORMANCE... by...

      LIMOZEEN!

    4. Re:Release Day by shird · · Score: 1

      The game: http://www.homestarrunner.com/awexome.html

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
  31. Holy APC, Batman! by khasim · · Score: 1

    Since when would Batman need a tank to handle crime in Gotham City?

    1. Re:Holy APC, Batman! by uberdave · · Score: 1

      If you read Dark Knight Returns, Gotham's teenage punk gang were being supplied with military hardware.

    2. Re:Holy APC, Batman! by khasim · · Score: 1

      Okay, I had to do a google search on that one ...

      But the info I turned up says that The Dark Knight Returns is set TEN YEARS AFTER BATMAN RETIRES.

      This movie is about the beginning.

    3. Re:Holy APC, Batman! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      As I recall the Batmobile in Dark Knight Returns was that way because it had been heavily modified at some point prior to Batman's retirement in order to handle some sort of riot situation (that was obviously pretty nasty because, well look at the damned thing). It just happened to be the perfect thing to use against the Mutant gang and their black market military weapons.

      Oh yeah and Batman should never have gotten out of it to fight the Mutant leader. Stupid move.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    4. Re:Holy APC, Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      As an American, it is Batman's constitutional right to bear arms. You can have his tank when you pry it from his cold dead hands.

    5. Re:Holy APC, Batman! by Hellasboy · · Score: 1

      Considering that Batman is supposed to get all his technology from Wayne Enterprises top secret military projects. This looks pretty rugged and quite frankly, something that could be used by a military in nearly any type of situation.

      sorry, it doesn't have neon lights and a 5 foot high fin, we all know how utilitarian that stuff is.

      --

      "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
    6. Re:Holy APC, Batman! by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 1
      sorry, it doesn't have neon lights and a 5 foot high fin, we all know how utilitarian that stuff is.

      Are you kidding? All he needs is a Type R sticker, and he'll have at least another 30 horsepower.

  32. batmobile by Saville · · Score: 2, Funny

    Super Swamper mud tires on the rear and slicks on the front. Best of both worlds!

    1. Re:Batmobile by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      Hint: Anything with a jet engine on the back never cares about fuel efficiency, especially when it doesn't even fly.

  33. How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by CygnusXII · · Score: 1

    Batman begins Cast
    Credited cast:
    Christian Bale/ Bruce Wayne/Batman
    (This is that annoying, stupid punk from The Movie Shaft, that is the Villain/ Baddie little Rich Boy)(And Reign of Fire)

    Liam Neeson/ Ducard
    Michael Caine/ Alfred Pennyworth
    Katie Holme/s Rachel Dodson
    Cillian Murphy/ Dr. Jonathan Crane/The Scarecrow
    Gary Oldman/ Sargeant James Gordon
    Ken Watanabe/ Ra's Al Ghul
    Tom Wilkinson/ Carmine Falcone
    Morgan Freeman/ Lucius Fox
    Rutger Hauer/ Richard Earle
    Sara Stewart/ Martha Wayne
    Richard Brake Joe/ Chill
    Linus Roache/ Dr. Thomas Wayne
    Colin McFarlane/ Commissioner Gillian B. Loeb

    So let's recap Adam West, Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer, George Clooney, and now this Buffoon.
    Why don't they Just Use that Terminator guy (Robert Patrick) He seems to be the death Knell, actor for a Series and Movies.

    --
    My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
    1. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by Tanlis · · Score: 1

      Have you seen him in American Psycho or Equilibrium?

      Both very good films.

    2. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen America Psycho?

      I think Christian Bale could be one of those extremely diverse actors who's career will never go bad. Think Brad Pitt, Guy Pearce or Johnny Depp.

    3. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a feeling Christian Bale will make a great batman.. he's the first actor to play batman who can actually act, has the right looks and voice, etc

    4. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by warmgun · · Score: 4, Informative

      Christian Bale is actually a very talented actor who excels in playing very complicated characters with serious internal battles. Just look at American Psycho, Empire of the Sun, and (to a lesser extent) Equilibrium. Bruce Wayne's internal struggle between the man and the bat is one in which every movie tried to grapple with but never really succeeded because the action was always top priority. Christopher Nolan, an expert of the psychological, directing this movie gives it the best chance in succeeding in profiling Batman's psyche.

    5. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget Christian Bale's role in American Psycho and Velvet Goldmine (and we'll just pretend that dragon movie never happened, thank you.)

    6. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Christian Bale is not a buffon...first of all.
      Check him out in Equilibrium: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0238380/.

      Its one of the better sci-fi films in the lines of Matrix and such. I don't think they could've picked a better actor after Keaton. This definitely will put Batman back on track along the comics turned movies like Spiderman and X-men.

      I just can't wait till they make Superman!!!!

    7. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Posting the rest of the cast kind of kills your point. There are a number of fantastic actors on there...Freeman, Wilkinson, Caine...not so much Neeson anymore *cough cough*. Freeman alone is enough to give me high hopes for any movie. Bale absolutely shines in dark roles. Ken Watanabe (The Last Samurai) and Cillian Murphy (28 Days Later) aren't well known (not in America, at least) but are also both extremely talented. And I always like a movie with Oldman in it a little more because of it.

      And come on. Rutger Hauer! Blade Runner! "Six! Seven! Go to Hell or go to Heaven!" What kind of geek are you?

    8. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by NemesisEnforcer · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you called Christian Bale an annoying punk. He's the "American Psycho"!

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0144084/

      If they want a moody, crazy, on-the-verge Batman, then I believe they found him. I'm personally looking forward to seeing the Dark Knight lose control on the big screen. Should be quite entertaining.

    9. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      As l.ong as he remember one key fact:
      Batman is not a persona of Bruce Wayne;Bruce Wayne id a persona of Batman.

      That's why Keatin was so damn good as Batman.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by CygnusXII · · Score: 1

      Ok, "American Psycho" and your point is?
      That is the Yard Stick you are Using to equate this man as a great actor? Give me a break. Batman has always been a Tall, Dark, Brooding Lantern Jawed, Taciturn and Mysterious figure, driven by inner Daemons. Having someone that's MOST noted as a "Psycho" portraying the Character is just silly.
      Russel Crowe(Quick and Dead, Gladiator,A Beautiful Mind), or maybe Colin Farrel(Harts War, Daredevil,The Recruit, PhoneBooth, Minority reports), Timothy Oliphant(HBO Deadwood, Girl Next Door,Gone in 60 Seconds, First wives club), or George Eads (CSI & Monte Walsh), these are all comparable actors.
      I can understand that some people want this fellow for his "Manic Qualities" and they might think he can bring a "Twist" to the Character of Batman, but I personally do not think he is a "Talent."
      I am glad they have a great All Star Cast, they are going to need it, to prop this Guy up, as Batman.

      --
      My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
    11. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by tekwiz · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness the people who get paid to cast actors made this decision and not you. I for one would not like to see Crowe, nor Farrel as batman...Crowe is more an action person and Farrel is one of the worst actors to attain star status imo...I have yet to see a Farrel movie where I actually enjoyed him and didn't think someone else should have been cast...as in SWAT, Phonebooth, Minority Report. Using Jar Jar over Farrel in those movies would have been much more entertaining lol

    12. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha...

      You used 'Keaton' 'Batman' and 'good' in the same sentance.

      hehe

    13. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and? He was perfect for Batman.

    14. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God, someone who sees through the fog of Colin Farrel. Look he is just playing the same I'm a sterotypical irish guy in every film. And Crowe would make a better villian ala Sid 6.7. And what are you judging C. Bale on, newsies? btw when did /. become moviepoopshoot.com?

    15. Re:How many crappy Bruce Waynes' can there be? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      You're just a fucking moron.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  34. Awesome by brainstyle · · Score: 1

    Okay, I'm officially much more excited about this movie next summer than Revenge of the Sith. It looks like they're going back to what works for Batman; George long ago lost sight of what was good in Star Wars.

    Interesting to notice that there isn't a prominently featured love interest anywhere in the photos on the website. This is great to see: romantic subplots really don't jive with the whole disturbed-anarchist-hell-bent-on-vengance thing.

    --
    "Why can't everyone just be straight with me?"
    "Because we live in a bendy world, dear."
  35. Re:another batman movie? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2
    You may be right. But, OTOH, none of the previous actors filling the role ever played a serial killer, let alone as well as Christian Bale did. So at the very least, it should be interesting.

    Oh, and he's British too, which I assume marks another first for the Batman franchise.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  36. A rumor... by skittixch · · Score: 2, Informative

    Has anyone else heard about this movie possibly being directed by Darren Aronofski? (Requiem for a dream, Pi) I've heard this from other people, and was just curious to see if anyone else had heard anything similar

    1. Re:A rumor... by klevin · · Score: 1

      Well, based on the trailer, they've already started filming, and imdb.com says "Directed by Christopher Nolan." Doesn't seem likely that Darren Aronofski's handling this flick.

    2. Re:A rumor... by imstanny · · Score: 0

      Yep, i heard it too. IN fact i saw it as part of a filmography for aronofski somewhere online. I also heard he's supposed to direct some movie visually comparable to the matrix.

    3. Re:A rumor... by eddy · · Score: 1

      Which one wanted the giant spider?

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    4. Re:A rumor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think at one time Aronofski was talking about doing Batman Year Zero, which I guess eventually became this, so it looks like he is out. Last I heard Aronofski will be doing Watchmen now.

    5. Re:A rumor... by NealokNYU · · Score: 1

      Aronofsky was given the Batman project for a while, but after script/casting difficulties, he left the project after about a year. Note that he did not steer as far into production as Tim Burton ventured into the new Superman. As far as I know, all Burton had left was principle photography and all that comes after that. I don't know if Aronofsky ever left the concept stage. For my money, between Insomnia and Memento, Nolan's a better choice anyway. Aronofsky is novel, no doubt, but he would rather mortify the audience than tell a good yarn. Note that he does the former very, very well, but Nolan is a better talespinner. (IMHO)

    6. Re:A rumor... by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Has anyone else heard about this movie possibly being directed by Darren Aronofski? (Requiem for a dream, Pi) I've heard this from other people, and was just curious to see if anyone else had heard anything similar

      Now THIS sounds like a topic for Ask Slashdot--the new source for people too lazy to use google. Or you could try imdb, and see it's Christopher Nolan.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    7. Re:A rumor... by psycht · · Score: 1

      It was directed by Christopher Nolan who also directed MEMENTO.

      Here some stats on Batman Begins

      On a side note, for those of you who doubt Christian Bale's ability to play the dark night, should check out Equilibrium

  37. Can we have - Batman ENDS? by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

    With the incredible job that has been done with Spiderman and X-Men, why do they have to beat batman to death? The first two were ok, dark, brooding, just like the comics. Then they decided to follow the campy television series.

    They have pretty much killed batman already IMO. The studios have the right idea with the Marvel franchise - but it seems that Dollar Comics produces worse movies. I wonder why that is?

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:Can we have - Batman ENDS? by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1
      Then they decided to follow the campy television series.

      My problem with the last two Batman movies isn't so much that they went campy -- I really, really like the 60s series a lot. It has a sense of the absurd that is just a pure joy to watch. The problem with the last two movies is that they didn't do it *well.* They didn't do anything well at all.

    2. Re:Can we have - Batman ENDS? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >The studios have the right idea with the Marvel franchise - but it seems that Dollar Comics produces worse movies. I wonder why that is?

      IF its done like DC can do comics then it should be pretty good.

      IMHO, in the past 10 years, DC top comics better than Marvel top comics. Early JLA and Kingdom Come just two name 2 that are good. The Ultimates, from Marvel, is the only thing I can think of that reaches that level.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  38. Batmobile by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1
    ...but I think I prefer it over the one Adam West used to cruise around in.

    That's just crazy talk. I really don't like this new Batmobile at all -- I just don't get the whole "bigger = better" aesthetics that seem to dominate car design these days (American design, at least, though everyone is in on the SUV game now).

    Oh well, at least Bruce Wayne won't mind if gas prices go up, unlike all the fools who complain after buying gas guzzlers.

  39. Re:Suggestion by sirGullible · · Score: 1

    uh. then what are you doing reading slashdot? dont the sections kinda tip you off?

  40. Speaking about Hummers... by canon006 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My initial reaction to seeing the new batmobile was "It kinda looks like a Hummer taking a crap."

    1. Re:Speaking about Hummers... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It kinda looks like a Hummer taking a crap."

      That's called a Blumpkin.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  41. Re:Suggestion by Mongo222 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dude.... The sub title here is "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." You are defiently at the wrong table.

  42. Holy crappy website Batman by TintinX · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rubbish site with everything opening in a popup or a _blank.
    I saw pictures of the 'new' batmobile about a year ago and it looks like a sporty version of a farmer's tractor.
    I've always been severely let down by the Batman movies. Each one seems to claim that it's true to the darkness of the original 'The Batman' story, but they never are.
    There's so much potential in a Batman movie as he's the only 'superhero' who actually isn't.
    He's merely a vigilante with the cash to develop some seriously cool anti-crime gadgets.
    Ah, if only....

  43. Anyone else notice... by Anubis333 · · Score: 1

    That there are clickable areas hidden in the batman logo. They appear to link to photos; I just thought it was odd. They also have place holder things like 'legal information goes here'.

  44. Never? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Funny
    Can never be disappointed by Morgon Freeman, Michael Caine, Liam Neeson, or Gary Oldman.

    Of course not. Those are awesome actors. The only thing that could mess that up would be to put them all together in another fucking Bat... oh... wait a sec...

    1. Re:Never? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Almost word for word what I thought when I read that. Then of course I thought that (generally speaking) I've liked a majority of the things that I've seen from Jack Nicholson, Danny Devito, Michelle Pfieffer (sp? Who the hell knows), Tommy Lee Jones, Uma Thurman, Governor Schwarzenegger.

      Nothing can send an apparently good cast straight down the crapper like a Batman movie.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re:Never? by lewellyn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or a Star Wars prequel.

      --
      bah
    3. Re:Never? by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      I've always blamed the writers for the performance. What can you do when (thinking of Governor Schwarzenegger) they think, "Hey, he's famous for one liners, lets not develop the character at ALL, even though he's supposed to be a brilliant scientist".

  45. Psychological Weaponry by EvilBuu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would he need pointy ears or a cape either (impossible parachute uses aside)? A) It's a comic book/comic movie, and B) there's probably a bit of the "striking fear into the hearts of criminals" when you come crashing through the wall in a six-ton goliath.

    --

    Green-voting, republican-registered, socialist-libertarian.
  46. The sidekick finally gets a sex change! hehehhee by urbieta · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I thought that faggot shortie was on to something! good for her! (whink whink)

    So am I supposed to say -ohh boy a hole new and improved batman to watch on the movies? ...

    brb!
    what's next? a Clark Kent that actually gets a blow job from Lois Lane?

    That monster lamborguinni is just not as fun as any SUV, Id settle for an Xtrail ;)

  47. Re:daredevil.. spiderman.. catwoman.. by UWC · · Score: 1

    Not really. There have been other good superhero movies in the interim. Hulk, Hellboy, X2...

  48. Looks Interesting by haijak · · Score: 1

    This is the first I have heard of the movie. Batman is a great character and many people who love to complain about the batman movies, completely forget about the first. It was actually very good. The second movie was saved by the fantastic cast. 3 and 4 were just kid movies not meant to be anything more.

    The trailer indicates that they are going back to when Bruce Wane first decided to become Batman. It also looks like this one will have a more serous tone than even the first. I suspect their won't even be any real "bad guy".

    This appears to be very different from any previous Batman movie to date. I don't think anybody should be quick to judge this one based on some of it predecessors.

    --
    Don't judge me by my spelling
    1. Re:Looks Interesting by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      no.. it's a batman movie. There will be a badguy. Actually, two. I think I've heard the Scarecrow and.. well, that guy who's name I wont try to spell. I love that guy :)

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    2. Re:Looks Interesting by nitemayr · · Score: 1

      R'ahs Al Ghul, right? "Raysh Al Gool"

      --
      Hello Kettle,
      You, my friend are as black as pitch.
      With love, Pot.
    3. Re:Looks Interesting by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      excellent work, detective.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  49. Shit... by Sly+Mongoose · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Now Batman drives an SUV. Like every other asshole in NA... :-(

  50. Not while people still pay for tickets. by khasim · · Score: 1

    They can do crap Marvel movies. DareDevil. The Hulk.

    I think the problem with Batman is that the producers and such try to re-make it into something that reflects themselves.

    This is great for Batman when your name is Tim Burton. Not so good when it's not.

    Just watching the teaser and looking at the pix gives me a bad feeling for this movie. But I'll wait until it comes out. It will be interesting to see how they work Scarecrow. I think they'll have to tone him down too much.

    1. Re:Not while people still pay for tickets. by Trent05 · · Score: 1

      I think the problem with Batman is that the producers and such try to re-make it into something that reflects themselves.

      True. It also seems the try to put in what they think is "cool" as far as current pop-culture goes with little reguard to the actual story lines or even the characters themselves. At least with the current comic book movies they're letting them keep their original names. The Hulk TV show had David Banner as the Hulk because Bruce Banner sounded too homosexual. I cringe when I think about what they are going to do with the americanized-live-action Evangelion movie. *wipes tear from eye*

      Back to the point, there's a funny part in "An Evening With Kevin Smith". He talks about working on a new Superman flick that seems to have been in pre-production for the last 7 years or so. He was working with a producer or somebody that said the new Superman shouldn't fly, wear a cape, and needs a completely new costume because the current ones were gay. He went on to explain that he should fight spiders, because they're the most evil creatures blah blah blah... They both were dropped from the movie and the producer with his head up his ass went on to make the cinematic masterpiece "Wild Wild West".

      --


      --
      The Marines: The few, the proud, the not very bright. - Slashdot tagline 04/21/05
    2. Re:Not while people still pay for tickets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be Jon "I can't read, and I used to be Liza Minelli's hairdresser" Peters. He's an idiot and is a major part of why it's taking a decade to get a Superman movie made

  51. Re:another batman movie? by UWC · · Score: 1

    And then there's the fact that Schumacher is nowhere to be seen, and those behind it seem quite competent. One was cowriter for Dark City, whose setting I thought would have made a better Gotham than even Burton's. My hopes are pretty high for this movie.

  52. Re:SUV by Catbeller · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm going out to get a Hummer tomorrow.

    Isn't that a little more than we need to know?

  53. Holy Ozone Layer, batman! by condour75 · · Score: 4, Funny

    With this SUV, there'd better be a BatSiphon on that utility belt.

    Rumor has it that Robin will be replaced by a new sidekick tentatively named Prince Saud.

  54. Re:The problem is DC Comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We did get Daredevil and the Hulk, though. (and way back when, Captain America)

  55. Re:another batman movie? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    He's Welsh, to be specific.

  56. b0rked in firefox-Self-defense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apparently the trailer link doesn't work in firefox, here's a direct link to save you the trouble: "

    There's nothing wrong with Firefox. It simply has the good sense not to let you watch it.

    1. Re:b0rked in firefox-Self-defense. by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Thank you for making a Thursday night worth living. :)

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
  57. Re:Suggestion by kaoshin · · Score: 0

    Nerds != Geek, dude.

  58. Talented F*ing cast... by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just look at the cast list... we're talking top-notch talent here.

    Funny thing is, because of their seemingly overly-prolific careers, my buddy and I have taken to calling Michael Caine "The White Morgan Freeman", and alternately calling Morgan Freeman "The Black Michael Caine". It's going to be strange to see them in the same film together.

    --
    "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    1. Re:Talented F*ing cast... by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      This is so offtopic but I think of James Earl Jones as the white Wilford Brimly and vice versa. Others may not though. I really don't know why either. In your case does those two act similarly or have similary characters in movies?

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    2. Re:Talented F*ing cast... by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      I think, if anything, James Earl Jones would be the black one. Then again I don't know who Wilford Brimly is so he could be blacker than JEJ.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    3. Re:Talented F*ing cast... by mink · · Score: 1

      Check out William B Davis (Cancer Man) and James Hong (who I like to call the Asian Cancer Man (I know he is from Minnesota)). They are frighteningly alike as evil masterminds.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  59. Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't he get revenege in the first movie, when he killed the joker? What kind of revenge is he going for this time (the guy from mister mom, perhaps)?

  60. Insane... by dchamp · · Score: 4, Informative

    CowboyNeal is insane. No batmobile can touch the 60's Lincoln Futura Batmobile. Had a supercharged Ford 427, and looked awesome.

    Gotta go... Natalie Portman is on Letterman now... :)

    1. Re:Insane... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gotta go... Natalie Portman is on Letterman now... :)

      umm...is she nervous?

  61. Re:The sidekick finally gets a sex change! hehehhe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's next? a Clark Kent that actually gets a blow job from Lois Lane?

    Abridged classic Mallrats quote: "There's no way Lois Lane could have Superman's baby. I'm sure he blows a load like a shotgun, it'd go right through her back."

  62. Ok... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    To everyone complaining about how bad Catwoman is, its not the DC character Catwoman! The woman played by Halle Berry is not named Selena Kyle, she does not live in Gotham City, and she has never even met this burce wayne/batman guy. It was just some shitty movie WB made that happened to be called Catwoman, now quit bitching about it.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Ok... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      really? How do they get away with that?
      Do you have a reference?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, that's not true. Look at the official site, and you'll notice a DC Comics logo on the bottom of the screen.

      C'mon, how many normal people know (much less care) that Catwoman's real name is Selena Kyle? This isn't Bruce Wayne or Clark Kent. The *point* of Catwoman is that she's a hot chick who goes around in a dominatrix outfit. The movie was faithful to the heart of the comics.

    3. Re:Ok... by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And personally I know Catwoman by the name "Comrade Kitka Alestov", thank you very much.

      --
      Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    4. Re:Ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The woman played by Halle Berry is not named Selena Kyle, she does not live in Gotham City, and she has never even met this burce wayne/batman guy.
      Then... this is catwoman how? I can shit on a brick and call it a pancake, but that doesn't make it IHOP. How many movies are they going to make before another zero hour? (Forward reference: maybe I am a comic geek.)

      (I'm not a comic geek. Nothing against comic geeks, I would've been one myself under the right circumstances.)
    5. Re:Ok... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      God, cant you people take sarcasm. I know its technically DC's catwoman, but its so far from the comics it shouldn't even count.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  63. It is his costume. by khasim · · Score: 1

    The pointy bat ears and the cape that give him the bat silhouette.

    And since it would be a movie, there's nothing stopping them from having any vehicle he drives crash through walls or doors or loading docks...

  64. Finally a Batman film that might not suck! by holmbrew · · Score: 1

    Finally a Batman with some hope of being good and true to the character. Batman is pissed and should be pissed. I for one am pretty excited about the film and it seems to be very well cast.

  65. Batman Begins filming locations by waynelorentz · · Score: 2, Informative

    They filmed some scenes for Batman Begins last week in one of the north suburbs of Chicago -- scenes involving the Batmobile.

    Next week, they begin filming more scenes from the movie in my building !

    According to the notice we got from the landlord, they're going to do some inside scenes, and some stunts involving helicopters.

    1. Re:Batman Begins filming locations by ThePDW · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could hide out with a camera there and get some spy pics for slashdot? :-D

    2. Re:Batman Begins filming locations by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      Possibly. They're supposed to be filming the helicopter scenes at night. Unfortunately, I work nights, but I might get lucky and they'll still be filming when I get home and I can take some snaps from my parking garage across the street.

    3. Re:Batman Begins filming locations by ThePDW · · Score: 1

      If you get some digital pics and feel so inclined you can email them to me at thepdw at gmail .com I'd love to see em...

    4. Re:Batman Begins filming locations by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      Ooh ooh me too! I'd love to see some pics if you get any mayonakaha at gmail .com

    5. Re:Batman Begins filming locations by Temsi · · Score: 1

      Most of the stuff you see in the teaser was shot in Iceland back in March.
      The Icelandic crew had to sign confidentiality agreements, so details are sketchy.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    6. Re:Batman Begins filming locations by duncangough · · Score: 1

      They've already done some filming in London: http://www.cityofsound.com/blog/2004/05/batman_in_ bloom.html

    7. Re:Batman Begins filming locations by msim · · Score: 1

      Your a geek, you've most likely got a digital camera. TAKE PHOTOS MAN!!!! :-)

      Please?

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  66. Re:daredevil.. spiderman.. catwoman.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad the hulk looked like crap. Why couldn't they just get a bodybuilder, paint him green and scale him up a bit?

  67. Looks good.... I'll plunk down my $10 by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to see they are doing a serious-er Batman. I never liked the original Keaton/Nicholson Batman series that start this more recent bunch of movies. I always thought Nicholson played the Joker as too much of a buffoon. My vision of the Joker was Alan Moore's, from the killing joke, where his pregnant wife died in a testing a Baby Bottle heater, he rapes Barbara Gorden /Batgirl then shoots her in the spine, and leaves her paralyzed, and then makes a throne of dead babies. Plus he's acting really, really gay the whole time. That's the joker!

    And of course the Dark Knight returns with an 65 year old Batman beating the shit out of an evil Superman.

    These young wankers don't even understand, do they?

    1. Re:Looks good.... I'll plunk down my $10 by Jacer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A: Superman wasn't evil, he was a political tool, used like our soldiers are currently. B: Frank Miller is a god.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    2. Re:Looks good.... I'll plunk down my $10 by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      A willing political tool; like he says in his monologue while's he's whupping the Soviets, the world doesn't want heroes. People get jealous, and fearful, and angry.

      He's just doing what he feels he has to, to be able to continue to do good.

      But yes, Bats whups him good.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Looks good.... I'll plunk down my $10 by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

      After all, the military isn't full of volunteer adults or anything. Like Michael Moore said, we're sending our "children" over there to sacrifice them!

  68. who cares about batman by rakesh_iiith · · Score: 1

    spiderman rocks

    --
    --- Rakesh Kumar Home Page:http://rakesh.in
  69. Cool crossover... by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

    Batman visits LV-426. Is it just me or does that look more like the APC than the traditional batmobile?

    1. Re:Cool crossover... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Well, after 8 years or whatever they're finally doing Alien vs Predator. Maybe after that and after Batman Begins they'll do an adaptation of Dark Horse's Batman vs Predator. Wow, that'd be cool...

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  70. Rejected title... by gwoodrow · · Score: 1

    Batman: The Brooding Returns

  71. Re:SUV by wayne606 · · Score: 1

    What would a Lamborghini SUV look like? Now we know.

  72. Re:The sidekick finally gets a sex change! hehehhe by aka-ed · · Score: 0, Troll
    That's not a "mallrats" line, it's an old third-grade joke (like much of Kevin Smith's repertoire).

    My dream of Batman will only come about if Sam Raimi grows weary of Spiderman, and Bruce Campbell sheds a couple of decades. Not likely, I guess.

    --
    I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  73. Batman: After the Dot Com Bust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Batman with no money, perhaps using a Hefty bag as a cape.

    Now THATs a story!

  74. Christian Bale by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

    Wow, Christian Bale playing a rich, handsome, borderline sociopath. We've never seen THAT before. That being said, although the guy's typecast, at least he's good at it.

  75. Liam Neeson by dedazo · · Score: 1
    He's back, and he's once again the dashing Jedi Knight ready to kick some serious sith ass.

    I fear Mr. Neeson has now been permanently typecast, or maybe they couldn't afford a new wardrobe so they asked him to bring his Jedi robe. Just grow a beard, Liam you old fruit. You'll be fine, lad. Just fine. No one will recognize you. What? No, no lightsaber. Put the ghastly thing away. Thanks.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  76. Hard Times by Michael_Burton · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hard times indeed for Batman. From stately Wayne Manor to a trailer... what a pity.

    --
    When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
  77. Re:SUV by cranos · · Score: 1

    Thankyou its good to know that Im not the only filthy minded indivudual on /.

  78. It's a Fing teaser. Get the news straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or don't report it at all.

  79. Re:The sidekick finally gets a sex change! hehehhe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's in "Mallrats", dosen't it still make it a quote from Mallrats??

    I can only hope and pray the comic-book movie "Batman" ascends to your astute taste in fine cinema.

    ...can I have your children?

  80. touchedmyjunk.com by Commander+Trollco · · Score: 2, Funny

    For once, that link is on-topic, and someone had to beat me to it! :-( Touchedmyjunk is a treasure, my favorite is the "Linus Torvalds" one. Lol.

    --
    http://persianews.on.nimp.org/?u=Tar_Baby
  81. Re:SUV by TiMac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, it would look like this

    --

  82. Get with it! by JasdonLe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those Batmobile pics have been up on that site for months! Turn in your Fan Boy card by noon. That is all.

    --
    ** A Sketch a Week **
    http://www.sketchplease.com
  83. They're still using a rubber / plastic suit by Trikenstein · · Score: 1
    all they did was sand the nipples off.

    I wish they'd used the cloth and leather, grey and black suit like the one in Batman: Dead End.

  84. WRONG! by JasdonLe · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://catwoman.warnerbos.com/

    That's the official site.

    There's a DC Comics logo at the bottom.

    'Nuff said.

    --
    ** A Sketch a Week **
    http://www.sketchplease.com
    1. Re:WRONG! by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

      Well it's been awhile, but I thought catwoman was just a slightly disturbed catburglar, not some superhuman pussy ;P

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    2. Re:WRONG! by GodOfNothing · · Score: 1

      DC Comics are owned by Warner Bros. As in Time AOL Warner, huge soulless megacorporation.

      Warner owns the rights to the film adaptations of DC's characters and mostly treat them with utter disrespect. Internally I'm pretty sure DC are appalled by a lot of Warner's decisions but what can they do? Publicly complaining about their parent company won't do them any good at all.

      The Catwoman film is nothing but a Halle Berry vehicle. They took the name, and threw away most everything else.

  85. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~bih/teaser_hi_a.mov

  86. Incorrect, senior by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060153/

    capt. correction strike again!

    I have heard they will, once again, mistakenly have 2 villians.

    Most batman villians could have enough story and depth to have a movie on there own.

    Hell, I think it would be cool if the begining of each movies dealt with the origins of the villian.
    Two face, how could even the most talentless hack with a mac not right a good movie with him as the sole villian?
    Riddler, not the tv nitwit that Jim Carry seemed to model hisa character, but the solitary really smart and quitly insane riddler could have been great. Done right, the audience could have been lkead to believe it was a different villian, just to find out it was the riddler.

    And lets not forget Calender man! errr..OK forget that 'villian'

    crap, slipped into my Batman rant.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Incorrect, senior by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *Most batman villians could have enough story and depth to have a movie on there own.*

      well.. um.. there's this crap on the theatres just now called catwoman.

      michelle pfeiffer.. now that was a twisted catwoman! *purr* and insane to boot!

      batman return is imho the best batman movie made.. and it did deal with the creation of the villains as well.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Incorrect, senior by Max+Nugget · · Score: 1

      >> I have heard they will, once again, mistakenly
      >> have 2 villians.

      Quoth writer David Goyer from the San Diego Comic-Con last weekend:

      Goyer: I know some people were concerned...Oh My God, they are going to do two villains, but we wouldn't have done it if it didn't fit in an organic way. Chris is a real task master and a perfectionist and when you are working with him, and Cillian can attest to this, he is hyper-cricital about everything has to make sense and everything has to be motivated. He won't even use a line the audience would love, even if doesn't make sense, if it is just there as sort of an easter egg for the audience he won't do it, so he holds everything up to a very high criteria and fortunately we were able to come up with a story that made perfect and total sense why there were two of them and why they were interwoven in the story and it was very organic.

  87. Re:The sidekick finally gets a sex change! hehehhe by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

    it's an old third-grade joke

    Actually, that's derived from a column written by Larry Niven decades ago. Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex.

    It's full of other insightful scientific inferences. For example, if Superman can fly, then his sperm probably can too!

  88. not a lot of torque at low rpm.... by Hallowed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Jet engines are high torque at high rpm, and very low shaft torque as they spool up, compared to reciprocating engines that make peak shaft torque about halfway through their rpm range (for a normal automobile engine). All the output torque in a turbine driven vehicle comes from a big heavy (in relation to the turbine itself) reduction gear box. They don't have a power curve like a reciprocating engine where you can step on the gas and get good acceleration right from the start.

    A good example is the helocopter turbines that they are building motorcycles with (Jay Leno has one). Those bikes start slow, and have pretty constant gentle acceleration, they just keep going faster and Faster and FASTER as engine rpm builds.

    Turbines are excellent in constant speed applications, but to have response and driveability in something like a car it takes a pretty complicated transmission. M1 Abrahms tanks use a continously-variable Allison X-1100-3B hydrokinetic transmission, which is a very complicated fluid-drive unit that uses the turbine to drive a variable-displacement hydraulic pump...the turbine runs at pretty constant rpm on low fuel at low demand (just enough to power itself), but as demand increases, the pump moves more fluid and the engine is fed more fuel. That hydraulic fluid then goes to hydraulic motors that are used to actually power the tracks....when the driver steps on the gas, the engine rpm does not vary a whole lot, but the fluid flow increases to the drive motors.

    The biggest reason to use a turbine instead of a reciprocating engine in an application like a ship or a tank is that turbines will produce the same (after gearing) power in a smaller physical package.

    The one place where turbines may possibly become practical in a car is in hybrids....the wheel motors are driven off of battery voltage, and the turbine turns the alternator to recharge.

    --

    1. When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend.

    2. Do not eat iPod shuffle.

    1. Re:not a lot of torque at low rpm.... by atcurtis · · Score: 1


      If you want a lot of torque at 0 RPM, the only option is the good old fashioned steam locomotive.

      Max torque when stationary :D

      --
      -- The universe began. Life started on a billion worlds...
      -- Except on one where stupidity was there first.
    2. Re:not a lot of torque at low rpm.... by gravelpup · · Score: 1

      Wow! Tom Clancy posts on Slashdot? Who knew?

      --

      Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.

    3. Re:not a lot of torque at low rpm.... by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 1

      Wow, a kick-ass assault vehicle AND it's eco-friendly? Who would have thought that Batman would be driving a turbine-powered Prius on steroids?

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    4. Re:not a lot of torque at low rpm.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's not the only option. Electric motors provide peak torque at 0 rpm.

  89. Never by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Batman is in something like 12 different books a month. Batman is a hot commodity. Has been for a great many years, probably will be for a great many more.

    Batman Strikes a cord in people.
    So does superman.

    It's almost like Superman is who people would like to be, but deep down, they know they're more like Batman.

    There is a lot of untapped potential in Batman for the sdreen. INHO the key is to treat each movie as a 'first' in Hollywood terms. In holly wood a sequel is considered successful if it makes 75% of the preceding movie. So the just try to ride the coat tails of the previous success. Obvioulsy this model fails for any long term franchise options.

    Comics to movies seems like it would be easy, but you need an exact vision to cut out the stuff that doesn't shift mediums well, and add stuff that works well on screen and does not take away from the original concepts and world.

    WHen George Cloney was asked:
    "Will you be in another Batman movie"
    he responded:"I think I pretty much shut that franchise down"

    He was a crappy Batman, but I got to like someone who is candid with there own performance.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  90. Bad news by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    she's 10.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Bad news by Alejo · · Score: 1

      mod-parent-up-or-die-in-karma-hell ;)

    2. Re:Bad news by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry this is /. after all. She's 14 as far as I remember. Don't have my copy to hand. And Batman is fifty five in TDKR, not in his sixties.

  91. Big Tires by serutan · · Score: 5, Funny

    You have to keep in mind, Batman built the big-tire version when he was still young, and had a mullet.

  92. SPOILER by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

    I know who did it, it was Boron.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  93. not likely by wotevah · · Score: 1
    I find it extremely unlikely that it would ever get to 180mph let alone 220mph. Not only because parts would start flying off it or due to drag (it's not exactly aero tunnel design) or the offroad wheels but because you have a 2.5 ton (yes that's 5000 lbs) hunk of iron with only 500 horsepower.

    Probably accelerates like a dog too, given the enormous sprung mass of the rear wheels.

    1. Re:not likely by wotevah · · Score: 1
      I suppose that's what the jet engine is for, when the V8 runs out of breath. But I still can't imagine those tires rated at 220mph, no I cannot.

      Oh yeah, and that was unsprung mass not sprung, doh.

  94. What big tires you have, Batman! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Funny
    All I can say is holy big tires, Batman!

    I guess Bruce Wayne can also use the Batmobile to relax by plowing the south 40 after a long night of fighting crime.

    --
    That is all.
  95. Not wrong by TrentC · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's the official site.

    There's a DC Comics logo at the bottom.

    'Nuff said.


    The reason DC is involved with it is because the producers got the rights to the "Catwoman" name from them. Apparently, that didn't mean they had to follow the continuity of the character.

    I know that on two other occasions, DC gave permission to use names of their characters to other movies. (I can't find an online reference for the second movie, though I remember seeing the acknowledgment in the credits.)

    Jay (=

  96. For monkeys - the mms:// link by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, in their infinite wisdom, the powers that be at /. decided that we aren't allowed to link to mms://

    mms://demand.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/windows /wbmovies/batmanbegins/teaser/teaser_500.wmv

    Now all you have to do is

    1) Copy the address
    2) Start | Run | WMPLAYER.EXE
    3) Ctrl-U to open a URL
    4) Ctrl-V to paste the address
    5) Remove the empty space that /. added after the word "windows" [so that the incorrect "/windows /" becomes the correct "/windows/"]
    6) Hit OK
    See, easy as pie. Any monkey could do it.

  97. Batman's sidekick is a girl? by ZoomieDood · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you sure??? It's kinda hard to tell, but you let me know what you think.

  98. Not the same guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy was Boner on Wonder Years.

    1. Re:Not the same guy by jbrandon · · Score: 1

      You mean growing pains?

  99. Actually... by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the pre- Kindom Come mythos, Bruce Wayne and Selena Kyle did have a daughter, Helena Kyle, AKA Huntress. This was the basis for a show on the WB 2 years ago, Birds of Prey. It was pretty good, but they banked on it being a hit like smallville and canned it after only one season.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Actually... by KshGoddess · · Score: 1


      Sigh. Brings back memories. There was also a separate series (about 2 years' worth, IIRC) of Huntress comics -- not Helena Kyle, tho.

      I think there was a crossover bit, but I can't remember, as everything crosses over everything in the DC universe at some point.

      --
      It's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable. It's a lot wrong to say it's a suspension bridge.
    2. Re:Actually... by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 1

      In the pre- Kindom Come mythos, Bruce Wayne and Selena Kyle did have a daughter, Helena Kyle, AKA Huntress.

      Just out of curiosity... where did you read this? Last I checked, Kingdom Come was supposed to be what was the current DC continuity but in a possible future, and nowhere in the DC continuity was Huntress ever related by blood to Batman or Catwoman. Her name was Helena Bertinelli, and was the daughter of a big mob family that was wiped out years before. (She was actually a school teacher by day, and a vigilante by night.) I always thought the Birds of Prey TV explanation was just BS they came up with to make it more Batman-related.

      Just my $.02...

    3. Re:Actually... by j-beda · · Score: 5, Informative
      In the pre- Kindom Come mytho...

      That would actually be the pre-"Crisis on Infinite Earths" mythos.

      Back in the day (before 1985/86 - see http://www.sequart.com/crisis.htm) the "DC Universe" was bifrocated into to "main" universes so as to provide some "logical" reason for the fact that many characters had histories streatching from as early as WWII. The "Earth 1" universe had the "modern" superheroes who's careers started ten or twelve years ago, while the "Earth 2" universe had many older heroes who's careers started before WWII. On Earth 2, many of these heroes were retired and had kids or sidekicks who had taken over their hero-identities. Batman/Bruce Wayne had married (and died?) and had had a daughter (Helena Wayne - see http://my.execpc.com/~icicle/THEHUNTRESS.html. Superman had wed Lois Lane and was in semi-retirement, and many others of the "golden age" heroes/JSA were also "old and grey".

      There were many more "earths" to mine for material. Earth-3 had hero and villian roles reversed. Earth-S had the Captain Marvel heroes and others like Spy-Smasher from the Fawcett characters that DC had aquired. There was a world with talking animals that had Hoppy the Marvel Bunny and Captain Carrot and the Zoo crew. There was Earth-Prime that had no superheroes and was where comic books about super heroes were published (supposedly WE are on Earch-Prime). The "Crisis" smushed all of these universes together and re-wrote history to try to simplify it all, and it was stated that there was now only ONE universe.

      The idea of parallel universes is however just too useful to not use, and recent DC stories are revived it with "Hyper-Time" and of course the whole "ElseWorlds" storylines are also in some sense alternative universes. Many DC/Marvel or DC/Other crossovers use the ideas of multiple universes too.

      In the last issues of the Superman comics before the rewrite of Crisis, "Superman# 423 and Action Comics #583, was a story about the future of the non-Crisis Superman's world. http://theages.superman.ws/History/whatever.php. It opens with one of my favourite quotes " This is an imaginary story... Aren't they all? "

    4. Re:Actually... by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      I applaud your mastery of all things DC!

      Bravo!

    5. Re:Actually... by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

      A note about Superman 423 and Action Comics 583: the two-part story they contained, "Whatever Happened to The Man of Tomorrow?" was written by Alan Moore and illustrated by Dave Gibbons, who would go on to make the quintessential modern comic, Watchmen.

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    6. Re:Actually... by rho · · Score: 0, Troll
      Jesus, neither you nor the grandparent have ever seen so much as an erect nipple that wasn't first penciled in, have you?

      The only more embarrassingly geeky than knowing the pseudo-science rationale for a panoply of "alternate" Earths to account for a superhero per-capita ratio that equals that of "reality" TV fans is to be impressed that somebody knows this irrelevant trival bullshit.

      (If you were being sarcastic, you're still a shit because sarcasm is the demesne of the Comic Book Guy, who is also a shit.)

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    7. Re:Actually... by j-beda · · Score: 1
      who would go on to make...

      According to this bibliogrophy the first issue of Watchmen was published the same month as the Superman stories, Sept. 1986, so it looks like they both happened at the same time.

    8. Re:Actually... by j-beda · · Score: 2
      Jesus, neither you nor the grandparent have ever seen so much as an erect nipple that wasn't first penciled in, have you?

      I think that my posting would be the "parent" rather than the "grandparent". But maybe you figure I've seen lots of errect nipples, but the person who confused "Crisis" with "Kingdom Come" has existed in a nipple-free (or at least errect nipple-free) zone?

      Just because YOU can't recall anything from the mid 1980's doesn't mean that the rest of us are all brain dead too. Or is you point that you are embarrassed by the fact that you DO rember all this stuff too? Or is it "before your time" or perhaps just too "lowbrow"?

      Some of us are not bothered that we are slightly, or not-so-slighly, geeky. It is interesting that you seem to be.

      Using some sort of a sexual inexperience insult is interesting. I wonder what it indicates about how our (or more probably your) social conditioning is tied up in sexual role modeling? Should the recipient of such a comment indignantly deny such a thing? Why does it matter one way or another? Does the gender or sexual orientation of the recipient of such a comment come into play? How about age?

    9. Re:Actually... by wizard992 · · Score: 1

      the "modern" superheroes who's careers started ten or twelve years ago, while the "Earth 2" universe had many older heroes who's careers started before WWII. On Earth 2, many of these heroes were retired and had kids or sidekicks who had taken over their hero-identities. Batman/Bruce Wayne had married (and died?) and had had a daughter (Helena Wayne - see


      Hmmm.. I only remember the bionic kid and dirt people from Earth 2. And Rebecca Gayheart. Yummy.

      Maybe Bruce Wayne was a stowaway on one of the lander pods?

    10. Re:Actually... by j-beda · · Score: 1
      nowhere in the DC continuity was Huntress ever related by blood to Batman or Catwoman...

      The parent should have said "pre-Crisis". The Huntress fist appeared in about 1976 on Earth-2 as Helena Wayne. Later alterations gave her the mob background.

      See here for more details and links.

    11. Re:Actually... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't even a big enough nerd to get it right, i was mostly talking about a TV show w/ some really hot chicks in it. And for the record i've been getting laid on a regular basis for about the past year.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    12. Re:Actually... by rho · · Score: 0, Troll

      Way to go--not only are you a goddamn nerd, you can't count, either. My guess is you've used the brain-pan space that normally handles math to store the secret identities of Bizarro Earth's heros.

      Let's do remedial math for Captain Nerd here: I was replying to a poster, which makes your post the grandparent. One, two, three. Got it, Brainiac? Damn, bet you wished you'd used the "Preview" now, don't you?

      (See, I remember quite a lot from the 1980s, but it mostly concerns reading, writing and simple math. Gosh, how devestated I am that I haven't memorized the Marvel Comics timeline instead!)

      Here's a life-changing clue. I offer it free of charge, no need to thank me, I'm the soul of generosity. Being a sci-fi/comic/anime fanatic does not make you special. It means you have poor prioritization skills, but in our wealthy Western culture you can perhaps be forgiven for that. Do not confuse knowing trivialities with being smart, as I goddamn know that you do. Appropriating "nerd" and "geek" to mean "smart" seems to be a hazing ritual here on Slashdot, required before you can get your membership card and your Perl decoder ring, but it's nothing more than self-delusion. You weren't ostracized in high school because you were smart. You were ostracized because you were tiresome, annoying, and obsessed with fucking comic books. Likely ugly as sin, too, but if homosexuality has taught us nothing else, it has shown that even crater-faces can find a warm place to put it. That's free sexual role modelling so you can take refuge in the weakest of your "points"; I even brought gaydom in, just because I'm nice like that.

      I look forward to your post where you cry, "yOu DuNt KnO mE!!!!!!1". In fact, I have a private bet on it.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
  100. New Batmobile by enginuitor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Holy fuel consumption, batman!

  101. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  102. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  103. direct links by yruf · · Score: 3, Informative

    all links directly to files or streams with 500kbps...

    quicktime .mov or real .rpm or windows media .asx

    enjoy

    --
    Klamotten fuer Ilmenau.

    1. Re:direct links by yruf · · Score: 1

      another try for the quicktime link.

      --
      Klamotten fuer Ilmenau

  104. Another trailer by dangerz · · Score: 1

    There was a trailer that a friend showed me in class earlier today. It had Batman and Robin in it, but it also had Superman as well.

    Is that the same movie?

    --
    The greatest experience we can have is the mysterious.
    - Albert Einstein
  105. what the hell is Qui-Gon Jinn doing in Batman?? by insomnyuk · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is not right. I mean, that outfit looks way too much like what he wore in Episode 1, as if I need those memories to come back...

  106. Set Design in Batman by Mr.G5 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I hope this sequel will have the same awesome set design that has been with the series since Tim Burton. Although the later movies lacked some of the far-out Burton style their set desing has always been really good at making you feel as though you were actully watching a comic book. None of the other recent comic book adaptations have taken it nearly as far as Batman has with the dark yet beautifully desgned Goham city sets.

    1. Re:Set Design in Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt that the Tim Burton aspect of Batman never quite had the right sense of propriety.

      Joker? Burton him out all you want. That kind of stuff is the Joker's deal.

      Batman should be more subdued.

      * for the record I really liked The Dark Knight Returns and have not liked any of the Batman films.

      ** "have not liked" (see above) is an understatement.

  107. Re:SUV by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't forget the tractors!

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  108. More pictures.. by andr0meda · · Score: 3, Informative


    here

    Looks damn UGLY to me..

    --
    With great power comes great electricity bills.
    1. Re:More pictures.. by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's the point. IIRC, the vehicle it's based upon from Dark Knight Returns (as previously mentioned) was generally built as a tank to break into the mutant's underground lair and... well... blow the shit out of them. It was meant to be highly functional, not a symbolic representation of Batman's wang like that horizontal boner from the original series of movies...

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    2. Re:More pictures.. by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      looks like a Battlestar Viper fighter with
      John Deere landing gear.

  109. What's with the monster truck batmobile in the pic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well its actually an SUV.
    Batman had to keep up with the Jones's or was that the Jokers?

  110. No, we can't take "sarcasm" (quote, unquote) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And with your UID, you should know that by now.

  111. Just what I want, another crap batman by CaptRespect · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What the hell? Who decided that we needed another batman movie? It's already been beaten to death. Hollywood has got some balls puting another one out.

    I don't have any faith in this one.

    Batcar looks stupid.
    Stupid guy from Episode 1.
    Stupid guy from 5th element.
    Morgan Freeman wtf.
    Other wuss old guy wtf.

    This is going to be just another Hollywood sell out movie, like I, Robot. I'm sure we'll see Batman, drinkin a Pepsi all pimpin in his batcar with his brand new Firestone Tires as the other guy is trying to explain midicolorians to Morgan Freeman (who is playing the smart old black man).

    Booo...

    1. Re:Just what I want, another crap batman by CokoBWare · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's too bad you're boohooing something you haven't seen yet.

      Historically, the Batman movies have gone from great to shit...

      The first "Batman" movie was excellent. Keaton pulled off Batman and Bruce Wayne believably, although Jack Nicholson stole the show (when does he not steal the show?). The second movie was meh... ok... and "Batman Forever" was stupidly named, Val Kilmer was a poor choice, and Jim Carey made the riddler look like a freakshow, not a twisted plotting villian. We can all thank Joel Schumacher and his egotisitcal directing style (and someone who has never obviously read good comic books) for the POS movie "Batman & Robin". It was a hunk of crap. Wtg Joel... you are a master of shit, and that movie proved it. I am ashamed that in my need to collect DVDs of comic book movies that I must buy your hunk of garbage... Fuck you Joel.

      On a lighter note, this trailer for "Batman Begins" looks dark like it should. Christain Bale is fantastic actor (if you haven't, rent American Psycho... sinister movie and brilliant) and he'll pull off the conflicted nature of Batman well.

      Remember, don't judge a movie before you watch it... you might just miss a good flick! I for one will wait until it comes out in theatres and judge it for myself.

    2. Re:Just what I want, another crap batman by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Historically, the Batman movies have gone from great to shit...

      Actually, you're only looking at the recent movies.

      Go back further, and you'll find that the first full-length batman movie was campy and silly, and had none of that "dark" bullshit associated with it.

  112. Re:SUV by Dizzle · · Score: 1

    That piece of crap was in a racing game years and years ago called Stunts. I remember it well because I'd set up tracks where I could build up the highest speed and then crush the cars on a wall.

    --
    -Dizzle
    "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
  113. No Val or George Batman is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll never forget seeing Val Kilmer as Batman and when he said "I'm Batman" I stood up from my seat and said "No your Ice and you killed Goose!!!"

    He will live forever in my memory as Ice from Top Gun he should just deal with it!

    George Is just not dark enough to play Batman. He has a calm personality.

    The best reason I can think of for this is the role Christian Bale played in American Psyco. Batman is disturbed and that needs to stay that way!

  114. Ricemobile? by Megane · · Score: 1

    So Batman wants to be a ricer now? He's already got the fart pipe and big tires, now he just needs to add a tail wing and lots of vinyl stickers.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  115. Not so fast by nicktripp · · Score: 1

    My understanding of the new Batmobile was that it looks that way for a reason. I picked up on a message board that the design is for some special purpose, and will make sense in the context of the film. I guess we'll have to wait a year to find out.

  116. Re:The sidekick finally gets a sex change! hehehhe by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1
    If it's in "Mallrats", dosen't it still make it a quote from Mallrats??

    Oh definitely. And if Banky recites the Gettysburg Address then that means it's a quote from Chasing Amy. You see, quotes are only attributable to their last given source.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
  117. Aronofsky by Prien715 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm really disappointed. I've been waiting and waiting for Batman: Year One directed by Darren Aronofsky (Pi, Requiem for a Dream). If there was anything he'd be able to bring to the film, it would be darkness and originality. Unfortunately the WB didn't like it very much.

    See this site for more details.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  118. Welcome to Chicago^H^H^H^Gotham! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Look close and you'll see a lot of Lower Wacker Drive and parts of Waukegan.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  119. He got it from Robin. A few movies back. by Chas · · Score: 1

    Some sort of meme virus from the "Luv-ma-cheen" doing suspension bounces in some less than savory parts of town.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  120. Bruce Wayne the Millionaire? by JawFunk · · Score: 1
    How the hell did he have time to make all that cashish if he's chilling in the moutains all his life. Suddenly decide to go to Brooks Brothers and take a bath?

    Hopefully they make it as epic as the first one, and not a farce...

    --
    [Please sign here]
  121. nothing beats the original batmobile! nothing! by tinkertank · · Score: 1

    that was the coolest car ever, bar none!

    --
    ___Abuse of power comes as no surprise___
  122. She Male (SMT) by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    ^_^ Someone's way ahead of you. She Male is a hero (heroine?) affiliated with the Offenders in Supermegatopia. Admittedly, it's an anthro superhero strip, but it's an amusing one.

    And under more mainstream (if only slightly so), there's Rebis of the Doom Patrol comics, quite possible the first hermaphroditic comic book hero.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  123. New batmobile? by atlacatl · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't this be the "new old" batmobile?

    Food for thought...

    As per Batmnan being played by "that" guy - I think he's too lispy...Oh well...

    --
    Esta es una firma en Espanol.
  124. Here's a good costume pic by f4thwave · · Score: 1

    http://www.darkhorizons.com/news04/batsuit.jpg. It still looks too rubbery, and his head is colossal. Is rubbery a word?

  125. Re:SUV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now something about that is just plain wrong. Hell, most independent farmers can't even afford a John Deere...so what's the point? Well, at least I learned something new today...I had no idea Lamborghini made a tractor. No wonder they went under.

  126. Oh, wow. by DAQ42 · · Score: 1

    That was cool. It was eerie too, cuz a lot of the flashes of scenes made me think specifically of several of the really good batman "zero hour" and "how batman became batman" comics that got me back into the dark knight series.
    The kid falling into the cave, seeing something in the dark (which, if I remember correctly, should be a honking huge ass albino female bat), the traveling the world bit (young bruce wayne spent a lot of time becoming a man of the world, searching for martial arts teachers to hone his skills as a first rate unarmed warrior).
    The series also spent a lot of time looking deeply into the dark waters of bruce wayne's psyche and detailing his madness (yes, kids, batman is insane. He's a vigilante killer who is driven by the images seeing his parents murdered. His only redeeming factor is that he struggles on a daily basis to fight the darkness within his fractured psyche to be a good person and benificial to society as his daylight persona, aka bruce wayne, philanthropist billionaire).
    This should actually be good, just because it has a great (ever seen Equilibrium) physical stunt fight actor, Christian Bale.

    --
    Don't Ask Questions. I don't know the answers and even if I did I wouldn't tell you.
    1. Re:Oh, wow. by krinsh · · Score: 1

      Uhm, excuse me. Yes, Batman has some personality and behavior disorders. But; I've never read any comic in which he killed.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
  127. I once sat in the old Batmobile by stuph · · Score: 1

    Joe Piscipo's son was a friend of mine in middle school. For his birthday one year his father rented the damn thing and brought it to school. Several of us got to sit in the thing, which at 13 was awesome... So I've kind of got a soft spot for that old thing.

    --
    --Less Thinkin', More Drinkin'...
    1. Re:I once sat in the old Batmobile by Mitleid · · Score: 1

      The old Batmobile as in the one pimped by Adam West, or the one in which Bruce Wayne tried getting some action off of Vicki Vale?

      --

      --
      Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
  128. Location by Lamont · · Score: 1

    The main location that appears in the beginning trailer is Blenheim Palace, which happens to be the birthplace of Sir Winston Churchill

    http://www.blenheimpalace.com/

  129. Wow. by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    J-beda talks about comic books like Carmack talks about video drivers.

    Someone tell him that Corky over here can't handle that.

  130. Here we go again... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    Liam is a jedi, AGAIN.

    Look at his costume on the website. If I was him I'd call my agent.

  131. Re:SUV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to live near a disgustingly rich family (something to do with Tae-Bo videos) who had one of those Lamborghini SUVs. They had it painted with that shimmery, iridescent purple paint that changes color depending on how the light hits it. Talk about conspicuous consumption...

  132. Pulp Origins of Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since it is well known that the character Batman is inspired by The Shadow, it should come as no surprise that Gotham is indeed used in some of the early Shadow stories by Gibson in the 1930's.

    Check out news:alt.pulp for more on pulp and the Shadow.

    So if Batman begins, will he begin in 1930?

  133. David Goyer wrote the script--a synopsis by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    David Goyer wrote this. He's the guy behind all three Blade movies. In fact, he directed Blade Trinity due out this December. He's not British.

    For the record, the screenplay is out on the net, I've read it, and I'm concerned. The movie isn't necessarily a restart of the storyline of the previous movies. It's a prequel that tells the story of how Batman became Batman. It starts with Bruce in a prison encountering ninja cult leader Ra's Al Ghul, and the story goes from there.

    Personally, I wasn't very impressed with the story. I was hoping for something involving the Joker, more along the lines of the Batman short film that debuted at Comic-Con last year (the one with the two surprise villains at the end...). At the least, I was hoping for a very disturbing story involving the Scarecrow. He makes a brief appearance and nothing more.

    I don't know, there just wasn't anything about the screenplay that grabbed me. Even Kevin Smith's campy Superman Lives screenplay was clever enough to keep me reading.

    And the new Batmobile just leaves me befuddled. I think Tim Burton's gothic sleek urban-missile design was perfect. This looks like a giant four-wheeling dune buggy that I'm finding difficulty relating to Batman at all, or figuring out the usefulness of in a massive city. Is this thing gonna hop over cars on the freeway or something?

  134. Ron Perlman is a lady's man by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    Selma Blair said during filming of Hellboy, she always saw him off set surrounded by women.

    Ron just exudes manly confidence, and women are attracted to that. Plus, his really deep voice.

  135. upcoming prequels and sequels by LiquidMind · · Score: 1

    as if a 5th batman movie wasn't enough, check out these other installments of well-known flicks...
    (these are all scheduled to be released in 2006)

    Hellboy 2
    Indiana Jones 4
    Kung Pow 2
    Pirates of the Carribean 2
    Police Academy 8
    Return of the Living Dead 5
    Shrek 3
    Superman Returns
    Texas Chainsaw Massacre Prequel
    X-Men 3

    and for a complete list of 2006 movies, click here.

    Personally, I'm looking forward to a few of them (e.g. X-Men) but really, how much longer until the Police Academy series reaches into the double digits?
    This is insanity!

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
  136. I'm surprised the /. crowd isn't more informed.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It surprises me that there aren't many comments in my +4 threshold from those who have been closely (or...obsessively) following this film.

    Here's my sincere attempt to provide some better information to this thread.

    This *teaser* trailer is primarily intended to give the mainstream audience a heads-up that this film is coming (next summer), and that it's going to be not only nothing like any Batman film that's been made before, but that it's not even going to feel like a comic book movie.

    Christopher Nolan (cowriter and Director of "Memento" and "Insomnia") is the helmer of this film. In a remarkable move, WB gave him carte blanche control of the film and has been adamant about not getting in his way (a remarkable feat for WB). The script is co-written by Nolan and David Goyer. Goyer has written for Batman comics in the past, and is as familiar with DC comics as any obsessed fan.

    The script harkens to Frank Miller's "Year One" comic, as well as some aspects of "Dark Knight Returns." But the story told in this film is highly original and inspired, and actually tells a story that even the comics have never really told: It's the story of how Bruce Wayne trained himself to become the Batman, how he travelled the world, learning from every martial arts master he could, etc. It's the story of his constant struggle avenge the murder of his parents.

    The "villains" of the film are Ra's Al Ghul (one of Batman's "ultimate" enemies...google him if you don't know who he is) and the Scarecrow. But rest assured, these villains play critical and organic roles in the film. They're not here because WB
    "every Batman film since Batman Returns has two villains in it"...it's just coincidence.

    The cast is a filled with REAL actors who were all hand-picked by Nolan (as opposed to by WB). Nolan's got a good reputation for having a strong eye for casting. Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne/Batman, Michael Caine as Alfred, Morgan Freeman as Lucious Fox (head of Wayne Enterprises), Liam Neeson as Ducard (a central character who I will bite my tongue and say nothing further of), and Ken Watanabe as Ra's Al Ghul (Ken Watanabe was Katsumoto in "The Last Samurai," his first English-speaking role, and one which earned him an Oscar nomination). Rounding out the cast, Gary Oldman is Lieutenant James Gordon (who has a central role, unlike the previous four films), Cillian Murphy as Dr. Jonathan Crane AKA the Scarecrow (Murphy is best known for his role in "28 Days Later"), Katie Holmes as Assistant DA Rachel (I forget the character's last name).

    All in all, a solid cast of solid actors. No George Clooneys or Arnold Schwarzaneggers in here.

    Those who are fans of the music and cinematography of Nolan's previous entries ("Memento" and "Insomnia") will be happy to know that Nolan brought with him his core crew members from those films, composer David Julyan, and director of photography Wally Pfister. The look of the film, as glimpsed in the teaser trailer, is, much like "Insomnia," raw and bleak. Nolan, a naturalistic director, is not a fan of CGI effects, so don't expect much of that.

    Nolan's focus is on realism. This film is going to be highly grounded in realism, so much so that it will not at all feel like a comic book movie. Which makes sense: Batman is "cool" in large part because it's not a far stretch to imagine him existing in a real world. Nolan's film will bring that point home.

    The film is largely about the psychodrama of Bruce Wayne. In fact, don't expect to see much of Batman in the film until late in the game. This isn't an action-oriented movie. And unlike the four films preceding it (which, obviously, are not in continuity with this film), Bruce/Batman is the center of the film, not the villains.

    The style of the teaser trailer, and the fact that you don't even really see Batman in it or get any sense that this is a Batman film until the last moment of the trailer, is a testament to what this film is all about, and shows the commitment of Nolan and WB to making this film a seminal picture.

    This film is going to finally put Batman on the silver screen with the respect, sincerity, and drama deserving of such a character. It's going to be massively good.

  137. You forgot fuel efficiancy and multi-fuel by DG · · Score: 1

    Two other things turbines have over pistons:

    1) Fuel efficiancy at high torque: when a turbine is running in its happy place, it gets very, very good fuel efficiancy. If you have something that needs to put out a lot of force, and it needs to sip fuel, a turbine and a CVT work great. If you have something that can run at the same shaft speed for a long time (like a ship or an aircraft) you can delete the CVT and gear accordingly

    2) Multi-fuel capability: a turbine's fuel system is very simple, and the fuel doesn't need to do much more than burn. Assuming it is properly filtered and doesn't have any real strange properties, a turbine can run on almost anything - like recovered vegetable oil. Diesels can do the same thing, just not as well.

    When the Abrams was designed, there was a lot of worry about fuel logistics in Europe during WW3, and so most tanks of that era can run on a variety of fuels - in case fuel had to be scrounged.

    What turbines DON'T do well is idle - fuel consumption at idle is almost as high as fuel consumption at full power. For a turbine-powered tank in "hurry up and wait" mode (as it usually is - especially in the defensive) this can burn a lot of fuel, as the engine is run to provide power for the radios, turret traverse, on-board computers, crew A/C, the boiler vessel (gotta have coffee) etc.

    There was a plan to equip the Abrams with some sort of APU for use when idling, but I don't know if that ever got implemented.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  138. True Story by DG · · Score: 1

    I live in Windsor and commute to Detroit.

    First time I ever crossed the birder, the US Customs agent asked me if I had any firearms.

    When I answered "No" he said "Good God man! Here, take mine!"

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  139. Re:SUV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No no no, its a little less than we needed to know... the details of securing such a commodity so that the rest of us on /. might have some clue, would be good to know.

  140. The "New" Batmobile design... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    ...looks like it was inspired by this.

    The knobby wheels don't seem to convey an image of speed and agility to me. Looks like an interesting movie though.

  141. It's 2004 by Nailer · · Score: 1

    When will real stop using .rpm for their fucking files? Sorry guys, that's taken.

  142. The movie should be named (spoiler) by acariquara · · Score: 1

    Batman vs The Joker vs Alien vs Predator vs WTF?

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  143. Re:SUV by netsharc · · Score: 1

    Actually, Lamborghini started out making tractors.One day Ferruccio Lamborghini complained to Enzo Ferrari that the clutch on his Ferrari was unsatisfactory. Enzo answered "What does a tractor maker know about super cars? Go back to your farm and leave the supercars to me.". The rest is history.

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  144. I'm surprised... by Max+Nugget · · Score: 1

    It surprises me that there aren't many comments in my +4 threshold from those who have been closely (or...obsessively) following this film. A lot of the pessimistic comments users have posted reflect concerns about things that are already known to be untrue (for example, the suit is not stiff, inflexible rubber like in the past four films).

    Here's my sincere attempt to provide some better information to this thread.

    This *teaser* trailer is primarily intended to give the mainstream audience a heads-up that this film is coming (next summer), and that it's going to be not only nothing like any Batman film that's been made before, but that it's not even going to feel like a comic book movie.

    Christopher Nolan (cowriter and Director of "Memento" and "Insomnia") is the helmer of this film. In a remarkable move, WB gave him carte blanche control of the film and has been adamant about not getting in his way (a remarkable feat for WB). The script is co-written by Nolan and David Goyer. Goyer has written for Batman comics in the past, and is as familiar with DC comics as any obsessed fan.

    The script harkens to Frank Miller's "Year One" comic, as well as some aspects of "Dark Knight Returns." But the story told in this film is highly original and inspired, and actually tells a story that even the comics have never really told: It's the story of how Bruce Wayne trained himself to become the Batman, how he travelled the world, learning from every martial arts master he could, etc. It's the story of his constant struggle avenge the murder of his parents.

    The "villains" of the film are Ra's Al Ghul (one of Batman's "ultimate" enemies...google him if you don't know who he is) and the Scarecrow. But rest assured, these villains play critical and organic roles in the film. They're not here because WB
    "every Batman film since Batman Returns has two villains in it"...it's just coincidence.

    The cast is a filled with REAL actors who were all hand-picked by Nolan (as opposed to by WB). Nolan's got a good reputation for having a strong eye for casting. Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne/Batman, Michael Caine as Alfred, Morgan Freeman as Lucious Fox (head of Wayne Enterprises), Liam Neeson as Ducard (a central character who I will bite my tongue and say nothing further of), and Ken Watanabe as Ra's Al Ghul (Ken Watanabe was Katsumoto in "The Last Samurai," his first English-speaking role, and one which earned him an Oscar nomination). Rounding out the cast, Gary Oldman is Lieutenant James Gordon (who has a central role, unlike the previous four films), Cillian Murphy as Dr. Jonathan Crane AKA the Scarecrow (Murphy is best known for his role in "28 Days Later"), Katie Holmes as Assistant DA Rachel (I forget the character's last name).

    All in all, a solid cast of solid actors. No George Clooneys or Arnold Schwarzaneggers in here.

    Those who are fans of the music and cinematography of Nolan's previous entries ("Memento" and "Insomnia") will be happy to know that Nolan brought with him his core crew members from those films, composer David Julyan, and director of photography Wally Pfister. The look of the film, as glimpsed in the teaser trailer, is, much like "Insomnia," raw and bleak. Nolan, a naturalistic director, is not a fan of CGI effects, so don't expect much of that.

    Nolan's focus is on realism. This film is going to be highly grounded in realism, so much so that it will not at all feel like a comic book movie. Which makes sense: Batman is "cool" in large part because it's not a far stretch to imagine him existing in a real world. Nolan's film will bring that point home.

    The film is largely about the psychodrama of Bruce Wayne. In fact, don't expect to see much of Batman in the film until late in the game. This isn't an action-oriented movie. And unlike the four films preceding it (which, obviously, are not in continuity with this film), Bruce/Batman is the center of the film, not the villains.

    The style of the teaser trailer, and the fact that you don't ev

    1. Re:I'm surprised... by Max+Nugget · · Score: 1

      Note that this is a repost, as I mistakenly didn't log in the first time and posted anonymously.

  145. Sorry, YOU'RE WRONG! by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    Right, since because DC Comics' logo being on it for legal reasons mean they approved of it creatively.

    Warner Bros. has their arms wrapped around DC's necks via contract rights. DC did not want what happened to Catwoman to happen. They did not like the direction the last two Batmans took either. Think a little next time.

  146. Sorry, YOU'RE WRONG, WRONG! by JasdonLe · · Score: 1
    Right, since because DC Comics' logo being on it for legal reasons mean they approved of it creatively.

    Where did I say that DC had anything to do with creative control?

    Nowhere.

    The parent of my post said that the movie had nothing to do with the comic character, in fact the parent states outright that it's a movie that just HAPPENS to be called Catwoman, as if by pure coincidence. My point (along with others) was that the movie obviously does have something to do with the DC Comics character Catwoman (i.e. is a movie adaptation of the character) as shown by the DC Logo on the official site. I said nothing more, and nothing less. I didn't say anythign about good/bad/ugly, creative control, past movies, etc.

    Way to utterly miss the point man.

    Besides, DC has no contract with Warner Bros. as you state. You are completely wrong, man. Warner Bros. literally OWNS DC. Let me repeat that. Warner Brothers owns DC Comics. DC has little if any control over what happens with/in/to movies using their comic book characters, because the movie studio OWNS those characters!

    Now go away!

    --
    ** A Sketch a Week **
    http://www.sketchplease.com
  147. Re:SUV by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

    That beast has "special stripes" and weighs in at nearly 3 tons. Geez frikkin' louise. I hope the "special stripes" impart special gas saving powers, because otherwise you might as well hook up a tanker of gas directly to the 444 bhp @ 6600 rpm engine.

    Youch.

    As for the new Batmobile, what the hell were they thinking? That doesn't look cool, it looks unfinished. It looks mismatched. And frankly, it looks like something my uncle Charlie put together out of the parts of his various demolished and blown up monster trucks after drinking all his Cow Palace Dirt Derby winnings. Fortunately for the kids, it never ran. But if a lightning storm had come up before the sheriff drug him away, it might have lived. Oh yes, it might have lived.....

    --
    *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  148. I hated it when the Spawn did the cape right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the awesome things the cape could do in the movie The Spawn, it's a shame -- a DAMN shame they didn't pour as much as those guys did with Batman's cape!

    That cape KICKED A$$

  149. Batman Begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Batman fans check out this page... tons o' Batman Begins News