Slashdot Mirror


Lucas to Make Sequels to Star Wars After All?

SageMadHatter writes "After denying the possibility of three new Star Wars movies taking place after the original triology story line, it appears that the possibility has actually opened up."

842 comments

  1. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    His work on the last couple movies has been outstanding. I hope he keeps directing them himself. May the force be with him!

    1. Re:Awesome! by jefe7777 · · Score: 5, Funny

      loads blaster...presses firmly to temple

      click.

      damn.

      another 3 we will have to suffer ;-)

    2. Re:Awesome! by baudilus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dude... you realize that you don't have to watch the movies, right?

    3. Re:Awesome! by Epistax · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lyndsay: Do I detect a note of sarcasm?
      Frink: Are you kidding me, this baby's off the charts.
      CBG: Oooh a sarcasm detector, that's a real useful invention.
      (detector explodes)

    4. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      May the force be with him!

      Yeah, the force of my hand slapping him upside the head...

    5. Re:Awesome! by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Funny

      While I can't find the original post for proper attribution, the following was suggested as a title for Episode III, but might be even more appropriate to 7, 8, and 9 as a whole:

      Dead Horse, Meet Mr. Stick

      I believe this came from the article wherein Episode III's title was released, but who knows...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    6. Re:Awesome! by the+unbeliever · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Technically? No, no we don't. But realistically we do. And we will, and we will bitch and moan and accuse Lucas of destroying our childhoods.

      Why do we do this?

      Because deep down inside, we are all just like the Comic Book Guy.

    7. Re:Awesome! by t1nman33 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and you don't have to watch a train wreck either. :)

      --
      --- Where's my car, and why are these grass stains on my pants?
    8. Re:Awesome! by Sebadude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because deep down inside, we are all just like the Comic Book Guy.

      And that, my nerdy friend, is precisely why the world doesn't give a damn whether we like these movies or not.

      --
      Eh.
    9. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sorry man, you have to wait for Greedo to shoot before you blaster works.

    10. Re:Awesome! by jefe7777 · · Score: 1

      meeza makeza joke

      of course i'll watch them. i'll watch anything lucas puts out, even if it is sub par.

      hell, i watched "Laser Blast" at the theaters in 1978. I'll pretty much watch anything sci-fi.

      Somebody's Laser Blast DVD review

    11. Re:Awesome! by Martin+Blank · · Score: 5, Funny

      Especially when it goes through the chemical factory. Then the orphanage. Then the retirement home. Then the convalescent unit...

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    12. Re:Awesome! by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Funny

      If Lucas produces another round of sequels, he may be tempted to reedit his previous films, so as to add various framing devices. The original versions will then be withdrawn from the marketplace.

    13. Re:Awesome! by ThatNuttyPeej · · Score: 1

      Worst... Simpsons Reference... Ever! (J/k)

      --
      This sentence's period was stolen This sentence knows who took it:
    14. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought I was the only one to have seen that flick.. mind you, not in theaters..

      Man alive what a great bad flick..

      I love bad movies. If you ever get a change to see Alien Species (Should have been named Alien Feces), do it.. I got it, and some movie with Eric Estrada in it, fer 6 bucks CDN for both. Badly Goodness.

    15. Re:Awesome! by rpresser · · Score: 1

      And here I thought you were pressing the blaster to Lucas's temple.

    16. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Personally I watch the movies only for the visual effects. If people want stories with a solid plot and dialogue they can't expect to rely on movies alone. Read some of the books.

    17. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you realize that you don't have to use the word 'dude' all of the time. It is meaningless in the context in which you used it. You sound like some '80s surfer loser.

    18. Re:Awesome! by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And that, my nerdy friend, is precisely why the world doesn't give a damn whether we like these movies or not.

      Not to mention the fact that even if they were the most brilliantly written and directed movies ever people would still be on here bitching about them!

    19. Re:Awesome! by digitalamish · · Score: 1

      Of course you're blaster didn't work. Han shoots first...

    20. Re:Awesome! by jannesha · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe that it was a poll.

      http://slashdot.org/pollBooth.pl?qid=1150

    21. Re:Awesome! by cjpez · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Er, speak for yourself. The first Star Wars prequel sucked, so I waited until the second one was at a budget theater to see it, at a matinee no less, which ended up convincing me not to see the third one at all. The second Matrix sucked ass in previously unheard-of ways. I didn't see the third one.

      There's no "technically" about it. If you don't want to go see a movie, just don't fucking go. It's not that difficult.

    22. Re:Awesome! by Nermal6693 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And, on a similar note:

      Scully: This is a simple lie detector. It lets us know whether you're telling the truth. Do you understand?
      Homer: Yes.
      (detector explodes)

    23. Re:Awesome! by Erasmus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to mention the fact that even if they were the most brilliantly written and directed movies ever people would still be on here bitching about them!

      Oh, just like how everyone is pissing and moaning over Spider-Man II and X-Men II. Except they're not. Because they didn't stink.

    24. Re:Awesome! by xSauronx · · Score: 5, Funny
      if they were that good id bitch and ask why he didnt do all three at once and beat LotR to the box office.

      As it is...i could dip my wang in ink, smack it down on some paper and sign it "Mr Floppy" and have a better script for a movie.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    25. Re:Awesome! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The first Star Wars prequel sucked, so I waited until the second one was at a budget theater to see it, at a matinee no less, which ended up convincing me not to see the third one at all. The second Matrix sucked ass in previously unheard-of ways. I didn't see the third one.

      I'll agree that the Matrix sequels were rather disappointing, but not nearly to the extent that the Star Wars prequels were. I went ahead and saw Matrix: Revolutions, although I wish now that I had waited for the dollar theater, but I have no intention of bothering to see SW3 at all. Rarely have I seen a sci-fi movie as utterly awful as Attack of the Clones.

    26. Re:Awesome! by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Technically? No, no we don't. But realistically we do.

      People are going to RAIL against you, but you're right, you know?

      I am very much a believer in non-participation as a form of protest. I won't watch the olympics, I won't see star wars.

      But enter: friends and family. I didn't want to see Catwoman, but the g/f did, so I did. I knew I ROBOT was going to blow chunks, but my father wanted to see it, and how many times do you have a chance to go see a movie with your dad when you're in your late 20s?

      Come to think of it, I haven't gone to a movie *I* wanted to see since Lost in Translation (which the ENTIRE theater walked out of except for me).

      And even if you don't have people who will drag you to movies, or you are lucky enough to have entirely film-snob friends, do you subscribe to HBO? They'll show the SW movies sooner or later, isn't that *LIKE* paying to see starwars?

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    27. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how they developed Jar-Jar Binks, character and dialog.

    28. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still believe ROTJ was even worse than the prequels. I even prefer Jar Jar to those stupid Ewok.

    29. Re:Awesome! by Lispy · · Score: 1

      The sad part is that I flew over from munich/germany to NYC to see Episode I. Talk about excitement. Needless to say it didn't live up to the hype. Still I visited NYC again to watch Episode II wich was even worse. Now I kinda have to see the third one too. Well, at least New York is always nice for shopping...

    30. Re:Awesome! by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Although there is no exploding machine, we can't leave out this one:

      Eddie: Did you hold a grudge against Montgomery Burns?

      Moe: No! [buzz] All right, maybe I did. But I didn't shoot him. [ding]

      Eddie: Checks out. OK, sir, you're free to go.

      Moe: Good, 'cause I got a hot date tonight. [buzz] _A_ date. [buzz] Dinner with friends. [buzz] Dinner alone. [buzz] Watching TV alone. [buzz] All right! I'm going to sit at home and ogle the ladies in the Victoria's Secret catalog. [buzz] Sears catalog. [ding] Now would you unhook this already, please? I don't deserve this kind of shabby treatment! [buzz]

      --
      My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
    31. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They did suck though.

    32. Re:Awesome! by cjpez · · Score: 1

      Well, any excuse to be in NYC is a good excuse, IMO, so I suppose the two probably even out...

    33. Re:Awesome! by da3dAlus · · Score: 1

      "Worst sequel ever. I will only watch it 3 more times. Today."

      --

      Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
    34. Re:Awesome! by Lispy · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least you don't have trouble at the international airport. "What's your purpose of traveling into the US?" -"Watch Episode II."

      I even got a smile last time, I guess someone who travels so far to watch Star Wars can't be a terrorist in their opinion.

    35. Re:Awesome! by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you saying that Attack of the Clones was worse than Phantom Menace? I find that hard to believe. I haven't seen AOTC, & I can't imagine it getting any worse.

      Seriously, I want to know what you mean, so that I could avoid watching.

    36. Re:Awesome! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you saying that Attack of the Clones was worse than Phantom Menace? I find that hard to believe. I haven't seen AOTC, & I can't imagine it getting any worse.

      Yes, absolutely it's worse. Much worse. On the plus side, it doesn't have Jar-Jar on screen for very long, and it has a few impressive battle scenes (like when the clones battle the droids). But the worst part of the movie is the absolutely horrible dialog and acting, especially by Hayden (Anakin). The "romantic" dialog between him and Amadala were literally painful to watch. If you really hated TPM that you couldn't bear to watch it again even if it was on free TV, then avoid AoTC at all costs.

    37. Re:Awesome! by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Well, sort of true.

      But there will be countless pop culture references to the new movies. People will discuss what's wrong with them ad-nauseum.

      It's a choice between watching the films, or not having a clue what anyone is on about.

    38. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst. Analogy. Ever.

    39. Re:Awesome! by onegear · · Score: 1

      What?!?!?!? You are kidding, right?

    40. Re:Awesome! by MilenCent · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, wouldn't that be the very best time to watch a train wreck? I'd be surprised if there wasn't a coyote at the wheel and a giant ACME on the side of the locomotive.

    41. Re:Awesome! by tntguy · · Score: 1

      Mute the volume anytime Anakin or Amidala are on screen. The rest is dreadful, but it won't make you suicidal (as much).

    42. Re:Awesome! by dslbrian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll agree that the Matrix sequels were rather disappointing, but not nearly to the extent that the Star Wars prequels were. I went ahead and saw Matrix: Revolutions, although I wish now that I had waited for the dollar theater, but I have no intention of bothering to see SW3 at all.

      Man, you people bitch way too much. With the exception of Jar Jar, I thought SW1 was pretty good. The pod racers were just cool. Not like anyone here is going to write a better script to explain the beginnings of Darth Vader anyway...

      SW2 was all about special effects. The idea of an army of clones is interesting. Explains why all stormtroopers wear masks (so you don't have to see the same face everyplace).

      Rarely have I seen a sci-fi movie as utterly awful as Attack of the Clones.

      You have apparently never seen any Trek movie then...

    43. Re:Awesome! by gl4ss · · Score: 0, Troll

      fuck, I just thought that nobody ever saw x-men II.. shit.. gotta dl it or something.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    44. Re:Awesome! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Man, you people bitch way too much. With the exception of Jar Jar, I thought SW1 was pretty good. The pod racers were just cool. Not like anyone here is going to write a better script to explain the beginnings of Darth Vader anyway...

      SW2 was all about special effects. The idea of an army of clones is interesting. Explains why all stormtroopers wear masks (so you don't have to see the same face everyplace).


      I hate to break it to you, but for people who are older than 15, special effects do not make a great (or even good) movie. Plot, acting, and dialog are very important as well, and Episodes 1 & 2 did not have these.

      You have apparently never seen any Trek movie then...

      I did say "rarely". ST5 was probably about as bad as Ep2.

    45. Re:Awesome! by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      I watched Star Wars. In 1977.

      Haven't seen any of the sequels, or what Lucas seems to be calling 'Prequels.'

      I feel it would spoil the memory of the original.

      --
      resigned
    46. Re:Awesome! by thynk · · Score: 1

      You know, you are absolutly correct. I've seen a lot of movies that really just plain sucked because someone didn't have someone else to go with. I usually wait until the movie is on DVD before watching it, especially if someone on slashdot likes it.

      side note... I, Robot turned out to be much better than I had expected it to. OTOH, The Village stunk, I was really disapointed. Of course, I paid little attention to either movie of this double feature as I was at the drive in with the woman whom I just reciently made my wife.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    47. Re:Awesome! by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      The idea of an army of clones is interesting.

      The idea of an army of clones was interesting in about 1954.

      It's tired, and Lucas' work has mostly been threadbare and tedious.

      --
      resigned
    48. Re:Awesome! by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

      Explains why all stormtroopers wear masks (so you don't have to see the same face everyplace).

      <Palpatine> I grow weary of seeing Temuera's face everywhere. Is there a way to add a bit of variety here?
      <Anakin> Hmmm. We could... make them all wear identical masks?
      <Palpatine> Remind me again how an idiot like yourself can become such a badass in only one more movie?

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
    49. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad. the second one was even better.

    50. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every other first parent in this thread has gotten modded up, so I'm posting here, too. ::crosses fingers::

    51. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I even got a smile last time, I guess someone who travels so far to watch Star Wars can't be a terrorist in their opinion.

      Thanks for the travel tip! When is this new Star Wars movie coming out?
      -Al Qaeda

    52. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was posted here sometime in January(I enjoyed it so much I copied it over to my blog)

      Suggested titles for episodes 7-9:
      Star Wars Episode 7: Milking the Cash Cow
      Star Wars Episode 8: Beating a Dead Horse
      Star Wars Episode 9: Please God, Make it Stop Already!

      Posted anonymously to avoid being a real whore.

    53. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes it IS difficult not to go to them. You're obviously not one of us. Please leave ;-)

    54. Re:Awesome! by KaiSeun · · Score: 1

      Here's an idea, do not let Lucas write or direct them! Then perhaps they might be 'outstanding'.

    55. Re:Awesome! by cshark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amen to that one.

      Honestly, I've been very happy with the progress Lucas has made on the recent star wars movies. It's one of those epic universes that can only get bigger.

      Not to mention more profitable.
      I've never been much good at being a purist, so I try not to do it.

      Star Wars has become such a large part of our culture over the last few decades that I don't think anything with the Star Wars name on it would flop.

      The Star Wars movies really push the envelope technically. They always have. I would watch them just to see where the technology's going.

      But I'm rather odd.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    56. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      No, Spiderman II stunk.

      I mean, over 2 hours and two 5 minute action scenes in it?

      [MINOR SPOILER]The rest of the time it was drama for children, complete with the NASA astronaut fionce being left at the alter.

      Ukkkkkkkkk. A thousand times UuuuukkkKKK!!!!

      X-Men II, on the other hand, ruled.

    57. Re:Awesome! by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1

      Menace was worse. But AotCs almost gives it a run for it's money.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    58. Re:Awesome! by emarkp · · Score: 2
      The "romantic" dialog between him and Amadala were literally painful to watch.
      Which just proves that Anikin is a geek and that Lucas knows his audience better than you think. Have you ever heard the "romantic" dialog between a geek and a girl?

      Yep, painful to watch, hear, etc.

    59. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll agree that the Matrix sequels were rather disappointing, but not nearly to the extent that the Star Wars prequels were.

      What? Did we see the same "Matrix Reloaded"? That movie sucked more ass than a professional ass-sucker. I mean the "rave in zion" scene alone was worse than twelve Star Wars prequels. If Lucas had had an extremely graphic scene with Jar Jar giving Yoda head, that still would have been better than the Matrix sequels.

    60. Re:Awesome! by HogynCymraeg · · Score: 0

      Dude, when this story is duped, it will be Lucas who fires first...

    61. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw it once in on opening night, I had waited in line for about 3 days. I was utterly disapointed in the movie. But in the end, I felt it was worth it because I was camped out in line for 3 days with about 50 good friends, and hundreds of other people, and there were trivia games, and people had home theaters in backs of trucks and were watching the originals. It was a really fun social expirence. Even if the movie sucked major balls, I had fun hanging out. Another thing that made it semi-better was I went and saw it a few months later in an IMAX theater, and they actually cut out the 20min or so of Anikin/Amadala dialoge. That made it much better. Almost bareable even.

    62. Re:Awesome! by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Well I suppose if you want to see how technology was going about 10 years ago then yes watch one of the SW prequels.

      I don't recall *anything* in either of the recent SW movies that could be described as innovative, cutting edge etc etc.

      The first Matrix movie and all the LOTR movies beat both the SW films into a bloody pulp. An average episode of ST:Enterprise has more advanced special effects that SW.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    63. Re:Awesome! by Clock+Nova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmmm. That's funny. I thought Spiderman 2 was the best comic book to movie adaptation to date. And, for the record, I thought Spiderman 1 was pretty good, I liked X-Men, I thought X-Men 2 was much better, I liked the first Batman movie (the one with Keaton) but thought the rest stunk, and I even kind of liked Tank Girl (though it was still a pretty bad movie.)

      Drama for children? Are you serious?

      I noticed that you dropped down to AC to post that, so you must have realized few people would agree with it.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    64. Re:Awesome! by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Homer preparing breakfast for Mr. Burns while Smithers is away:

      Cooks something on stove, catches fire, says "Hmmmm..."
      Smashes glass on microwave door and holds shish-kebab through it, catches fire, says "Hmmm" again...
      Pours milk on cereal, catches fire, Homer says "Hmmmm" once again.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    65. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noone ever reads the fine print.

    66. Re:Awesome! by geordie_loz · · Score: 1
      The idea of an army of clones is interesting. Explains why all stormtroopers wear masks (so you don't have to see the same face everyplace).
      Surly if they all wear the same mask you do see the same face everyplace?

      I agree that SW2 was pretty decent.. there was some poor love scene dialog and stuff, but it's needed if Anakin & Padame are gunna make our good buddy luke..
    67. Re:Awesome! by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Anakin and Amidala are the most contrived relationship ever. What is she, anyway, some sort of sicko pedophile?

      That said, Attack of the Clones has some really good moments, too. Obi-Wan riding that probe thing through the streets of Coruscant, the charge of the Jedi into the midst of the battle droid army.

      And some good drama. Count Dooku is just plain cool. He's almost as good of a villain as Darth Vader himself, he just doesn't get enough screen time. And hopefully he won't get more in the next movie, because I know Lucas will screw it up.

      Yoda fighting was anticlimactic, I'll give that. In fact, all the light saber fights just look too choreographed. Luke vs Vader in Ep 5 was down and dirty no holds barred fight to the death. Nothing at all like that here.

      All that said, i enjoy the new star wars movies for what they are, even if it irritates me that they aren't what they're supposed to be.

      All's I can say is, the stories for Ep 7, 8, and 9 were already written by Timothy Vaughn (sp?) under direction and guidance of Lucas himself, and if Lucas rewrites them to make new movies I'm never watching star wars again. If they really want these movies made, they should seriously just give those three books to Spielberg and let him adapt them to the big screen.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    68. Re:Awesome! by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Well, they did switch out their rendering farm to a linux cluster right in the middle of making the second movie.

      It is also the first (or so lucas says) movie to be shot solely with digital cameras.

      The CG stuff is bleeding-edge CG stuff, even if it is still just CG stuff.

      Yoda isn't a puppet in the second movie, he's a CG character.

      And, as usual, Lucas is still a pompous ass, and he's innovating new ground in that area every day.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    69. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brothers girlfiends moms who knows the guy who delivers the mail to the mom of the buttler of george lucas and he heard all about the sequels. Basically they go like this

      Episode VII : The rise of the Gungans. Jar Jar uses his status as a legendary war hero to become the king of the gungans. King Jar Jar then make a deal with the remnants of the empire to act as spys and give info about the new republic in return for enough weapons to finnally conquer Naboo. Before the attack he says " me say peeple gonna die " The empire then uses info from them to track down both Luke and Leigha, take dna samples, and splices them together to make a superjedi.

      the next two are mostly about the love story between jar jar and leighukea, also includes flashback scene to episode II that was recovered from R2D2, the galaxy is finally at peace after everyone sees natalie portman in the birthday suit.

    70. Re:Awesome! by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Well, they did switch out their rendering farm to a linux cluster right in the middle of making the second movie.

      And as a film goer I care why?

      It is also the first (or so lucas says) movie to be shot solely with digital cameras.

      And a a film goer I care why?

      The CG stuff is bleeding-edge CG stuff, even if it is still just CG stuff.

      I cannot remember a single "wow" moment in the entire movie. Or, as was the case with LOTR, thinking back afterwards: "wow that was impressive and I didn't even realise it was using CG". With the latest SW there simply has been nothing that looked impressive regardless of how (inapprpriately perhaps) complex the implementaion was. For example I know some people creamed their pants over the pod racing scene: my reaction was one big YAWN!.

      Yoda isn't a puppet in the second movie, he's a CG character.

      Sure but it was either a) poor CG or b) poorly used CG because he still behaved like a Jim Henson puppett: talk about stiff. And the "fight" scene with Dogo was just a joke! Oooh look Yoda is so powerful because he can do back-flips. Well I've been watching more impressive gymnastics in the Olympics: and there they make no claims to have mastery of the force.

      And, as usual, Lucas is still a pompous ass, and he's innovating new ground in that area every day.

      Personally I wouldn't care if he made all his minions bow down and call him lord. The problem is that it shines through in his movies. (Just like Tarantino and the Kill Bill movies: now those are strong challengers to Lucas' claim to the crappest movies of the 21st century".

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    71. Re:Awesome! by rthille · · Score: 1

      Might I suggest fixing a nice dinner as a social event alternative to going to the movies with friends/relatives? It's cheaper and you get to socialize the entire time without having people around you to STFU :-)

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    72. Re:Awesome! by vi+(editor) · · Score: 1
      The idea of an army of clones is interesting. Explains why all stormtroopers wear masks (so you don't have to see the same face everyplace).

      No, it's fucking stupid.
      In this first movie of the old series the wannabe jedi frees princess Leia. He enters the cell in a stromtrooper uniform without mask and Leia think's he is a stormtrooper who wants to rape her. Thus we can conclude that all stormtroopers look like Luke Skywalker.

    73. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if he follows the storyline for the third trilogy that is already outlined, then I think it will be an awesome trilogy, except for the ending.

      It should(assuming above) be based on Lukes and Mara Jades kids and Leia and Hans kids.
      If I remember correctly there are two clones in the trilogy. One of Luke, and another of Anakin.

      In the end, and I hate this part, they destroy a star system that is supposed to hold the dark side, thus destrying the dark side forever.
      Plus the mandalorians are back in this one and threatening the new republic so that's cool.

      Lucas chose to use the second trilogy because the story was strongest. He knew that the first trilogy wasn't as powerful as the second which is why he was hesitant to do it even today. The third tilogy will be better than the first but still can't touch the second.

    74. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Of course* we *MUST* watch them.

      We are nerds, so to us it's like that music the piper dude played for those rats, or when the lemmings all rush to the sea, or when the swallows (african or european, I can't recall) all come back to Capastrano.

      So we must, we must! It is our destiny. It is inevitable.

    75. Re:Awesome! by nnappe · · Score: 1

      Oh, just like how everyone is pissing and moaning over Spider-Man II and X-Men II. Except they're not. Because they didn't stink.
      Or perhaps it was because Spider-Man I and X-Men I also stunk. I am not saying that they did, just that the problem with Star Wars is that everybody is so much fond of the first ones, that they feel they lose something if the prequel is worse.

    76. Re:Awesome! by nmk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hate to break it to you, but even people over 15 sometimes watch movies for the spectacle. Not every movie has to be profound or have oscar level acting. The Star Wars prequels provided plenty of spectacle. You don't have to sit there and analyze why a race that's built a sophisticated underwater city is launching plasma projectiles using catapults mounted on beasts of burden. I'm not trying to be cynical here, I mean it. Just watch the fucking movie, and enjoy the pretty explosions. If you somehow find yourself feeling less intelligent by enjoying a simple movie, well that probably means you're not very intelligent. So don't worry about it.

    77. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Wait... I thought the rule was the ODD numbers were the good ones? *confused*

    78. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right.... I guess I imagined the myriad of discussions criticizing Spider-Man II for the supposedly "unrealistic" manner in which he lost his powers...

    79. Re:Awesome! by juhaz · · Score: 1

      No, no we don't. But realistically we do.

      No. We don't.

      I saw PM, it sucked, others say AtoC was crap and that's enough combined with own experience from the first one, I don't have slightest "realistical" compulsion to shell out money for something I know is a piece of shit, or even sacrifice the very small amount of work and time it would take to just warez it, because I absolutely don't have any need to see it.

      I just _may_ watch it in few years when it's in TV, if I don't happen to have anything more interesting to do at the moment (doesn't take much to accomplish that, though)

      Same goes for the episode 3, whatever it's called, if reviews by sane people show it isn't mud, I may take it under consideration.

    80. Re:Awesome! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Dude... you realize that you don't have to watch the movies, right?"

      The force is strong with this one...

    81. Re:Awesome! by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      All's I can say is, the stories for Ep 7, 8, and 9 were already written by Timothy Vaughn (sp?)
      Timothy Zahn.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    82. Re:Awesome! by Wile_E_Peyote · · Score: 1

      You will be receiving a letter from my lawyer for causing the 3rd degree burns I just received after spitting hot tea all over myself. Not to mention the near choking from laughing so hard.

      I will need years of phycho-therapy after this...

      W.E.P.

      PS - George Lucas has become a hack and should not be allowed to direct or write movies any longer.

    83. Re:Awesome! by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      ...and we will bitch and moan and accuse Lucas of destroying our childhoods.

      Couple of observations here-

      Lots of movies are shit. If you go to movies, you're going to see some shit.

      If I was to go to a shit movie, out of a selection of shit movies:

      I'd rather see a shit movie with aliens, spaceship battles, light sabre duels, big explosions and high production values that a shit independent/romantic-comedy/foreign/period-piece/e tc. movie.

      I'd rather see a shit movie that everyone else I know is also seeing, than something bad nobody has ever heard of. Bitching and moaning is fun, especially if it's done with some insight, and lots of other people appreciate that insight and agree.

      In the end it's also good to know that huge amounts of fame and money and great past work don't equate to the ability to make a good movie today. Because that loosely suggests that someone without much money, fame, or past experience to speak of can make a good movie- we'll need that fresh talent when people coasting off successes from decades ago finally die off.

    84. Re:Awesome! by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      Exactly, the point is that The Matrix and LOTR brought Brand New CG techniques to the screen or used them in genuinely innovative ways that made you go "wow" when you first saw them.

      When I first saw Bullet Time it had a significant impact on me and made my heart beat that bit faster. When I first saw enormous numbers of soldiers generated using Massive it took my breath away. There was actually very little that was actually innovative in CG terms in the new SW films.

    85. Re:Awesome! by Dogers · · Score: 1

      The best comedy always seems to be left alone by the mods, shame :)

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    86. Re:Awesome! by yulek · · Score: 1

      i still haven't seen any of the prequels.

      here's what i posted to a closed list on may 8th, 1999:

      "I was in the Potrero Safeway last night getting shit for the house and I saw the big spaghettios Star Wars display near the bread. Impressive and menacing. Very menacing. I walked around the corner and saw Star Wars ice cream from Dreyer's. In the candy isle they have all sorts of Star Wars candy. I was walking by the Pepsi machine and someone just bought a pepsi with some face on it. I asked if I could look closer, it was Liam, and the can was a Star Wars "Collector's Edition" Pepsi can.

      Everywhere I fucking turn, I see this Star Wars shit. Star Wars Lego sets, Star Wars shoes, Star Wars kitchen items, Star Wars fucking toothpaste (I haven't made anything up yet!!!). But that can of Pepsi, the "Collector's Edition", that put me over the edge. I know I know, you're rolling your eyes and saying "get used to it" but don't you understand??? STAR WARS KITCHEN ITEMS???

      I am hereby boycotting The Phantom Menace. I will not see it. I refuse to see it. Who's with me!?!?! CHARGE!!!!!!

      For some reason I feel like Opus, standing in the middle of "the meadow" pointing my finger into the sky and screaming at the insanity of the
      world in one frame, and then sitting dejected and alone, sniffing a dandelion in another. 'Cause no one is listening. No one could
      POSSIBLY be listening. The world has been hypnotized. The Phantom Menace isn't just a title, it is that evil which has made us all believe that there are no excuses, THIS MOVIE MUST BE SEEN!!! Everyone MUST see this movie or society will shun them, nay, excommunicate them! I believe now that I have been blessed with a tremendous vision! I just realized that fuck, I DON'T have to see it afterall!!!! What a relief!
      My god, I really thought that it was my DUTY to see it, but no longer!!! Hahahahahaa!!!! I'm free! I'm going to watch the Bicycle Thief! I'm going to watch Citizen Kane! I'm going to fucking watch 2001! Over and over and over, until this trilogy, oh and a very evil
      and diabolical trilogy it is, is over. See you in a few years.

      Okay, I know all you drone heads will see it anyway, but at least do me
      one huge favour:

      Don't tell me about it. Don't rave to me about it. I know it's probably going to be good, but I'm NOT. GOING. TO SEE IT. Don't be
      surprised if I clock you the moment you start telling me about the wonderful special effects or the amazing soap like plot twists or how
      angry you are that the fucking Ewoks made a cameo appearance. I REFUSE TO CARE!

      My fucking god, what time is it? The sun is rising! I gotta go play some Team Fortress Classic before the wife wakes up.

      ~J

      P.S. I feel ... different. "

      --
      in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
    87. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anakin and Amidala are the most contrived relationship ever. What is she, anyway, some sort of sicko pedophile?

      Think about it. When Anakin is 18 Amidala is going to be what - about 24'ish. She will be at her sexual peak and ready to look for a boy toy.

  2. Han shot first! by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hokey moneygrabbing and ancient storylines are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re:Han shot first! by filth+grinder · · Score: 3, Funny

      Money grabbing is the word. I suppose this little nonstory coming out just before the DVDs of the orginal series come out.

      This is a slick move to get people excited for the DVDs.

      This is not the rumor you are looking for, you can go about your business, move along, move along.

    2. Re:Han shot first! by JLyle · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Hokey moneygrabbing and ancient storylines are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
      I misread the first two words as "Hokey monkeygrabbing," which made it more disturbing but ultimately even funnier than you originally intended.
    3. Re:Han shot first! by PhotoBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sure a few newly added scenes that set up the next trilogy would help the DVDs sell in massive numbers.

      That said maybe Lucas plans on re-releasing the original trilogy again in a few years time with new footage so that he can sell the original trilogy again! I've already got 3 copies on VHS... pan & scam, widescreen and SE... They should just give Lucas a money printer and save some time!

    4. Re:Han shot first! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Hopefully we'll all meet again in Spaceballs Two, The Search for More Money."

    5. Re:Han shot first! by semifamous · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, no...

      It's "Spaceballs 3: The Search For Spaceballs 2"

    6. Re:Han shot first! by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      That said maybe Lucas plans on re-releasing the original trilogy again in a few years time with new footage so that he can sell the original trilogy again!

      Will the new scenes include a plotline?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    7. Re:Han shot first! by ThatNuttyPeej · · Score: 1

      You're right- monkeygrabbing should be done in a more sober and deliberate fashion, otherwise... uh....

      --
      This sentence's period was stolen This sentence knows who took it:
    8. Re:Han shot first! by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      No, just Jar Jar. You see while you thought the whole saga was about Anakin it's really about Jar Jar as the final trilogy will show you.

    9. Re:Han shot first! by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, I'd be much more interested in that than in these star wars movies!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    10. Re:Han shot first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Off Topic, but why not?

      DARK HELMET: What the hell am I looking at? When does this happen in the movie?
      COL. SANDERS: Now. You're looking at now, sir. Everything that happens now is happening now.
      DARK HELMET: What happened to then?
      COL. SANDERS: We passed then.
      DARK HELMET: When?
      COL. SANDERS: Just now. We're at now, now.
      DARK HELMET: Go back to then.
      COL. SANDERS: When?
      DARK HELMET: Now!
      COL. SANDERS: Now?
      DARK HELMET: Now!
      COL. SANDERS: I can't.
      DARK HELMET: Why?
      COL. SANDERS: We missed it.
      DARK HELMET: When?
      COL. SANDERS: Just now.
      DARK HELMET: When will then be now?
      COL. SANDERS: Soon.

    11. Re:Han shot first! by GQuon · · Score: 1

      At last, my sig. is getting results. :-)

      --
      Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    12. Re:Han shot first! by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1

      Yogurt! I hate yogurt! Even with strawberries!

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    13. Re:Han shot first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redundant is me, but yeah, I would like to see another Spaceballs movie too! Hmmm.

    14. Re:Han shot first! by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      "This is a slick move to get people excited for the DVDs."
      Judging by the cynical majority of posts here, I'd say it's working wonders. ;)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    15. Re:Han shot first! by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      DARK HELMET
      You call this a radar? What's all this churning and bubbling?

      COLONEL SANDERS
      No sir, we call it *smack* Mr. Coffee.

      DARK HELMET
      I always have coffee when I'm watching radar.

      COLONEL SANDERS
      Of course you do sir!

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  3. Funny... by detritus` · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Funny how a couple hundred million can make someone change their minds :)

    On the otherside its all just rumors until the cameras start rolling....

    1. Re:Funny... by Greger47 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Riminds me of the classic

      Bart: How could you Krusty, I'd never lend my name to an inferior product.

      Krusty: Oh! They drove a dumptruck full of money up to my house. I'm not made of stone!

      /greger

    2. Re:Funny... by Nept · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny how a couple hundred million can make someone change their minds

      Lucas made a net of 400 million on the Phantom Menance alone. The movie grossed far more than this, but this is what Lucas took home personally.
      I'm guessing by the time the third one has come out, he'll be another (or close to a) billion dollars wealthier.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    3. Re:Funny... by razmaspaz · · Score: 1

      On the otherside its all just rumors until the cameras start rolling...

      Will they need cameras for the next star wars movie? Sheesh!

      --
      I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
    4. Re:Funny... by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Funny how a couple hundred million can make someone change their minds

      I can't be bought like that. Just go ahead and try, I dare you.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    5. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What cameras? By the time he gets around to making them everything will be digitally rendered anyway.

      Maybe he could get the computer to write the script too.

    6. Re:Funny... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      You're trying to be funny, but really, that's all that's left to digitize. Lucas has done everything else.

    7. Re:Funny... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Funny

      >On the otherside its all just rumors until the cameras start rolling....

      Cameras? They use cameras in Star Wars movies?

      More like just rumors until the SGI machine boots up.

    8. Re:Funny... by CoderB · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if it was a 'couple hundred million' people or a 'couple hundred million' pocketbooks. :)

    9. Re:Funny... by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      It could be worse, he could be designing a new operating system in his spare time...

    10. Re:Funny... by Ghouki · · Score: 0

      interviewer : how do you sleep at night? McBain : with beautifuls girls on a large pile of money

      --

      insert witty comment here
    11. Re:Funny... by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      You forgot one permutation:

      Interesting how a post titled Funny can be rated, er... Funny...

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    12. Re:Funny... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      >More like just rumors until the SGI machine boots up.

      Don't you mean it's just rumors until the script is written?

      Wait. Nevermind.

    13. Re:Funny... by razmaspaz · · Score: 1

      that's all that's left to digitize
      Yes I was trying to be funny. But I think we are making the same point. I was saying they won't need a camera becasue Lucas will turn everything digital including the actors. Since he can't make the film he "wanted to make" with real actors he will have to go all digital.

      Maybe after looking at the LoTR movies and seeing them marry digital and cinema quite well Lucas will take some pointers. Of course Peter Jackson has more talent in his pinky finger than Lucas when it comes to directing...but I digress.

      --
      I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. huzzah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    yay! more hot grits and natalie portman jokes

  6. Boo hoo... by dmayle · · Score: 1

    It's enough to make a grown man cry... Six more hours of Jar-Jar... It means they'll have to do a whole new 4, 5, and 6 so that they can edit it whatever new story details Lucas feels are necessary. ...and Greebo will still shoot first...

    1. Re:Boo hoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Greebo? Greebo??

      Go stand in the corner and think about what you've done.

    2. Re:Boo hoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can a one eared tomcat shoot first?

    3. Re:Boo hoo... by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they'll only be two hours long?

    4. Re:Boo hoo... by Aliencow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I registered with a special email addy on your freeipod thingie, for fun, since it doesn't work for people in Canada anyways...

      Less than 30minutes later..I received a spam on it...

    5. Re:Boo hoo... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      ...and Greebo will still shoot first...

      Whoa! How did Nanny Ogg's cat got involved there?

      --
      No sig
    6. Re:Boo hoo... by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

      Its Greedo you insensitive clod!

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
    7. Re:Boo hoo... by TheGrimace · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you mean Greedo and not Greebo.

    8. Re:Boo hoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Greebo the Emperor's cat? Or Someone's cat? Curse this Alzheimers!

    9. Re:Boo hoo... by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Greebo is indeed a cat, but he belongs (if cats can be said to belong to anyone) to Gytha Ogg, a notorious witch from Lancre. Notorious not for dark works of evil magic, but for that song, the one about the hedgehogs...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  7. Wow, by Emugamer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who would have thought that an anonymous post on a fan site about something so obvious would lead to something like this.... no ... no really... who would have thought?

    1. Re:Wow, by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      Most of the things they post on the main page of that site come from sources inside Lucasfilm. They have tipsters that have been feeding them info since ep.1
      For those who didnt RTFA This isnt just an anonymous post to some msg board

    2. Re:Wow, by darien · · Score: 1

      ... and the British think a hundred and twenty characters is a long sentence?

  8. Great! by Sandman69 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not only has George Lucas destroyed our Star Wars past, but the future as well!

    1. Re:Great! by Sandman69 · · Score: 1
      My bad, he's also destroyed the present by releasing the orignals with he tainted bile!

      I am Hung So Low and I shoot first!!

  9. Reliable Source by GeorgeMcBay · · Score: 4, Funny

    My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with a girl who saw Lucas pass out NDAs at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty serious.

    1. Re:Reliable Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you watched Ferris Beuller on TBS this morning too.

    2. Re:Reliable Source by greenegg77 · · Score: 1

      My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with a girl who saw Lucas pass out NDAs at 31 Flavors last night.

      So what does that make me?

      Absolutely nothing.

      --
      --- This .sig for sale - $500 OBO.
    3. Re:Reliable Source by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Tell that to the guy I just had this conversation with.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    4. Re:Reliable Source by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      And it's still more believable than an internet rumour.

    5. Re:Reliable Source by Elminst · · Score: 1

      Wrong movie...
      G-parent is quoting Ferris Bueller's Day off, not Spaceballs.

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    6. Re:Reliable Source by nmx · · Score: 1

      So what does that make me?

      Absolutely nothing.

      Sorry, wrong movie. Thanks for playing!

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try."
  10. Hmm... by shirai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if George Lucas will revise history again and say that he *DID* originally plan to film 9 chapters from the beginning.

    The story on this has changed a few times.

    --
    Sunny

    Be my Friend

    1. Re:Hmm... by Aardpig · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally, I'd like to see him delegate these to another director.

      An interesting idea. I'd like to see the Episodes co-directed by John Carpenter, David Fincher and Paul Verhoeven. Just imagine it: stoned Jedi anarchists with a grand dollop of T&A. Mmmm.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:Hmm... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, why not.

      he might just refilm the whole 4,5,6 as well, or buy cheapo cartoon versions of them.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Hmm... by B5_geek · · Score: 1

      I thought the story was always the same.

      Original story = 3 Acts
      Each act = HUGE script/story
      Smart idea = "I can split up each act into 3 parts (movies)."

      Biz idea = Act 2 (part 1/episode 4) looks like the best thing I can sell to the BigWigs.

      Profit - Finish Act 2.

      Retirement Fund = Act 1

      Never have time to make and/or leave that one for my kids = Act 3

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quentin Tarantino would be even better, we could take bets on who would be the last character standing.

    5. Re:Hmm... by Sebadude · · Score: 2, Informative

      There IS actually an official trilogy that follows the events of the OT. The books were written by Timothy Zahn and are quite excellent, the best you can find in the expanded universe in my opinion.

      Of course it was "official" when I read it, but that was almost ten years ago, so who knows.

      --
      Eh.
    6. Re:Hmm... by nine-times · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I thought the story was always the same.

      Nope. I remember numerous interviews to the effect of:

      When IV-VI came out, he was saying "Oh, yeah, I actually have 9 movies written already. I just shot the middle 3." Years later: "Well, the middle 3 are already done. I have the first 3 all written, but I haven't quite figured out all of the last 3." Years later: "Well, I've just finished writing Episodes I-III. The only thing I ever wrote was episodes IV-VI. I had in mind a general idea of what had happened before, and I just thought it would be clever to start in "Episode IV" so that people would feel like they came in part way through an epic story. However, I think there are neat ideas in there, so I'm going to make more movies. There isn't any such thing as episodes VII-IX." Between episodes I and II: "I'm still writing episode II, and when I'm done with episode II, I'll start on episode III. There was never going to be anything after episode VI. I think you could do more, but I'm old and tired and don't want to do it."

      Not that I know what to make of all that

    7. Re:Hmm... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      he wouldn't *need* to invent a good story for 7 8 9.

      he could just get off his high chair of "i'm mister visionary" and film zahns trilogy.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Hmm... by cynic10508 · · Score: 1

      The story on this has changed a few times.



      There is no episode 7, 8, or 9! These are American lies!! As we speak, Star Wars is committing suicide against our walls. The movie executives will have their stomachs roasted in hell!

    9. Re:Hmm... by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Well, the Thrawn Trilogy is official, only in that it's lucasarts approved, which is the case of many Star Wars books, there's over 70 at the present time.

      However, if you've read the Thrawn Tilogy and paid attention to Episodes 1 and 2, you'll notice they contradict one another in a number of details.

      And don't even think of factoring in the chaos that the comics (again, lucasarts approved) introduce into the timeline.

    10. Re:Hmm... by jdray · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hang on to that memory. Eventually, he'll buy the rights to the interviews so he can re-edit them for consistency.

      There were always nine movies planned. These aren't the interviews you're looking for.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    11. Re:Hmm... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      Right... because the "Luuke Skywalker" idea was visionary:

      LUKE: "Who the hell is that?"

      JORUUS: "He is... Luuke Skywalker! Your clone! We found your hand sitting in an airduct in Cloud City and made him."

      LUKE: "Really."

      JORUUS: "Quite ingenious, actually."

      LUUKE: "Bizzaro!"

      JORUUS: "Well... but maybe not that intelligent..."

      LUUKE: "I'm helping!"

      I hit that part and just shook my head. I'm not knocking the Thrawn trilogy as a whole, but the ending was rather weak.

      Dark Empire, I think, lends itself to the idea of VII, VIII and IX. However, I think the best way to handle it is to abbreviate Thrawn trilogy and make it the source for one movie, "Dark Empire" another and then create a New Jedi Order-based movie for Episode IX. And, yes, I would kill Chewie if I were the director. Sometimes the good guys do die...

      The timelines would have to be toyed with since Hammil, Ford and Fisher would all be over 50 at that point (Ford would be well into his 60s), which means that any kids (Jacen, Jaina, Anakin, Ben) would already have to be born and at least 8 or 9 on up...

      But it could be done. And done well.

    12. Re:Hmm... by GregChant · · Score: 1

      I believe the idea was to give the sense to the audience that they have just been thrown into the middle of a really big story, like someone who has just started watching a soap opera (hence the colloquialism, "Space Opera", for Star Wars).

      I don't think he's ever gone on record prior to the original trilogy making huge wads of cash saying that this is just the middle three of a series he planned to finish: it was more of a plot device in A New Hope to confuse the audience.

    13. Re:Hmm... by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you didn't see Star Wars in 1977. The original version didn't have a subtitle. "Episode IV - A New Hope" was added when Star Wars was re-released with a trailer for "Return of the Jedi". By that time everyone on the planet that was old enough to see Star Wars and wanted to see it, had seen it (often multiple times). So it really wasn't a plot device, more of a marketing device.

    14. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see him delegate Episodes 7-9 to another writer.

    15. Re:Hmm... by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      In the very authorized follow up to Episode IV, Alan Dean Foster's "Splinter in the Mind's Eye", Luke and Leia made out and nearly (I recall, it's been 20 years) consumated a sexual relationship. Yes, Timothy Zahn's books are great, but the post-episode continuity may not have anything to do with Zahn's books or any other Star Wars novels. The story line will be based on one premise: How much money can George Lucas make? Maybe they'll even find Earth.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    16. Re:Hmm... by Zathras11 · · Score: 1

      I'm loathe to post on this subject, but when I
      was a child I distinctly remember an interview
      with Mr. Lucas where he stated his original
      vision was THREE trilogies (ie, 9 movies). I
      was very into the first three (4, 5 and 6),
      but since it took him so long to get those out
      on DVD (I guess any time now, right) I refused
      to watch the new stuff. No reason to go back
      on a promise now, just to find out what Han
      and Leia's kids turn out like. ;^)

    17. Re:Hmm... by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

      Well, then there was also the fact that when Star Wars was originally in the theater in 1977 it was titled Star Wars and there was not an Episode IV or the title "A New Hope".

      Those of us old foggies that are old enough can remember back that far. That was my first date, opening night, because a girl I liked saw me with the book and was interested in it.

    18. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because Gary Stu admirals who have no personality and can figure out the exact date and place of a battle via studying art is ever so interesting.

    19. Re:Hmm... by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      The books were written by Timothy Zahn and are quite excellent, the best you can find in the expanded universe in my opinion.

      The Zahn books were good - but, every other novel set in the Star Wars universe post-Empire follows exactly the same plot. A former member of the old government discovers a super-weapon the Emperor was working on before he died hidden in some out-of-the-way place, and tries to get hold of it. Luke Skywalker then saves the say by effortlessly killing hundreds of bad guys. Those novels suck because a) there isn't an ounce of originality in them and b) the characters from the movies are treated with such reverence that it's impossible to care about them - we already know that they're going to win in spectacular fashion, who cares? It's like Superman. Superman isn't brave, he's indestructible. Big difference.

    20. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it matter if he says the next film is set before or after the last?

    21. Re:Hmm... by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      I think he got close to the truth in the third quote, but does it really matter to anyone except to George Lucas himself? He's getting like Stephen King, who's obsessed with revising all his past stories so that they fit with his vision of "the dark tower" and "the beam" to which "everything is connected". These guys should sit down and talk. ;)

  11. Thank God! by still_sick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Without ten more years of new Star Wars, whatever would fans have to complain about?

    --
    ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    1. Re:Thank God! by WwWonka · · Score: 1

      Without ten more years of new Star Wars, whatever would fans have to complain about?

      Not sure, but I'm holding my ground with bountiful ammunition like Alien Vs Predator.

    2. Re:Thank God! by tktk · · Score: 1
      We would have complained about Lucas not making 7, 8 & 9.

      You always find something to complain about if you just try hard enough.

    3. Re:Thank God! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to worry about that. The guys running the Star Trek franchise are way, way ahead of you there. They've got your "something to complain about" covered for the next ten years easy.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    4. Re:Thank God! by valintin · · Score: 1

      Tim Burton remakes.

    5. Re:Thank God! by rcamans · · Score: 0

      Moderator: It was a joke.
      His sig is:
      I wept because I had no pants, until I met a man who had no ass.
      He had no pants.
      Goatse.
      Get it?
      I guess not.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
  12. I just hope... by LeiraHoward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...that *if* they get made, they don't degrade my fun memories of what Star Wars *should be* any further.... :-(

    1. Re:I just hope... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...that *if* they get made, they don't degrade my fun memories of what Star Wars *should be* any further.... :-(

      Perhaps you shouldn't watch them, then. It's not like it's some third party - it's the creator of that universe. It's his to do with as he pleases, good or bad. If you didn't like the prequels, and can't take your rose-colored glasses off to watch the first three, perhaps just staying out of the theater is your best bet.

    2. Re:I just hope... by Paladin128 · · Score: 1

      It actually is possible... if he uses the storyline from Zahn's Thrawn trilogy... fantastic books part of the official Star Wars expanded universe. That is until Lucas invalidated a few things in Episode II. Still, they could be adapted for screenplay.

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
  13. Please find another director. by wray · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Preferably the same who directed ESB.

    --
    Guess what? I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
    1. Re:Please find another director. by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly, it seems Irvin Kershner hasn't done anything since the Seaquest DSV television series in 1993... link

    2. Re:Please find another director. by insane_ewok · · Score: 1

      I thought I read somewhere that George Lucas didn't like ESB. Probably because there weren't any Ewoks or cuddly aliens. I think Lucas considers ROTJ and Phantom Menace as his masterpieces. :-)

    3. Re:Please find another director. by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      Quentin Tarantino

    4. Re:Please find another director. by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      Actually it would be better if he wrote and directed. Kill Jar-Jar Vol. 3

    5. Re:Please find another director. by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1

      There's not a whole lot of active 81-year old directors these days. I'm betting he retired.

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    6. Re:Please find another director. by bobobobo · · Score: 4, Funny
      Nah, I think we already have an idea of what that'd be like(not sure who to credit, had to google around for it):

      10. You don't need to see my goddamn indentification, 'cause these ain't the motherfuckin' droids you're looking for.

      9. Womp rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'll never know, 'cause even if it did I wouldn't eat the filthy motherfucker.

      8. This is your father's lightsaber. When you absolutely, positively, have to fill every motherfuckin' stormtrooper in the room . . . accept no substitutes.

      7. If Obi-wan ain't home then I don't know what the fuck we're gonna do. I ain't got no other connections on Tattooine.

      6. Feel the Force, motherfucker.

      5. What ain't no planet I've ever heard of! Do they speak Bocce on What?

      4. You sending' the Fett? Shit, Hutt, that's all you had to say!

      3. Yeah, Chewie got a hair problem. What the brother gonna do? He's a wookie.

      2. Does Jabba the Hutt look like a bitch?

      1. Hand me my lightsaber . . . it's the one that says, "Bad Mother Fucker."

    7. Re:Please find another director. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Informative

      Kershner kept rejecting scripts and script edits, and kept being professional and caring about his own ideas of the movie, rather than being a suck-up yes-man to Lucas. For RotJ, Lucas surrounded himself with yes-men, and barely managed to get a decent movie made.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    8. Re:Please find another director. by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      Still, Travolta Fett would be cool.

    9. Re:Please find another director. by Mogomra · · Score: 1

      Irvin Kershner? Oh, yeah, because he did such an amazing job on Robocop 2.

    10. Re:Please find another director. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like battle field earth cool.

    11. Re:Please find another director. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having *met* Irv Kirchner (and nearly having my eye removed with a chopstick by him while he grumped about marketing people) I wouldn't let him direct traffic.

      This ain't 1979, you know.

    12. Re:Please find another director. by bluehills · · Score: 1

      Less awkward dialog, more action/non-verbal communcation.... Go back to the "Classic" action/dialog style of the Original Star Wars.

    13. Re:Please find another director. by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Quentin Tarantino

      It's been done

    14. Re:Please find another director. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoa whoa whoa...

      "...When you absolutely, positively, have to fill every motherfuckin' stormtrooper in the room..."

      are you sure "fill" is the word you're looking for?

  14. Clicky Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  15. worse than the prequels by Alucard454 · · Score: 1

    well... can they be worse than TPM and AoTC?


    ...stop laughing and try to have a little faith in lucas... i still like indiana jones, dammit!

    --
    education
    That which discloses to the wise and disguises from the foolish their lack of understanding.
    ~a.bierce
    1. Re:worse than the prequels by wigle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, George Lucas wrote and produced the Indiana Jones series, but Spielberg directed them.

      Maybe Spielberg should be the one to direct the new Star Wars?

      --
      ::wigle::
    2. Re:worse than the prequels by SamSeaborn · · Score: 5, Interesting
      have a little faith in lucas... i still like indiana jones, dammit!

      The Indy movies are directed by master Spielberg. Lucas is an FX man and, arguably, a decent editor. As a director he's a hack, as a writer he's way too quick to "borrow" story elements from classic works and other sources.

      I almost fell on my butt when I saw the giant elephants in Return Of The King. "You mean Lucas stole the AT-ATs from Tolkien??" I had always thought the idea of elephant-like walking tanks was brilliant, turns out he stole that too.

      All those years I thought Star Wars was great art, turns out it's just pulp. Factor in budget and expectations, Clones literally tops the list as worst movie ever made.

      Sam

    3. Re:worse than the prequels by Alucard454 · · Score: 1

      a) thank you for correcting my ignorance, and
      b) that's a damn fine idea.

      --
      education
      That which discloses to the wise and disguises from the foolish their lack of understanding.
      ~a.bierce
    4. Re:worse than the prequels by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 0
      Maybe Spielberg should be the one to direct the new Star Wars?

      Thanks, so much, for mentioning that. Now I have to find some Pepto Bismol.

    5. Re:worse than the prequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he stole the AT-AT's from BattleTech. The Goliath I believe.

    6. Re:worse than the prequels by ultraslacker · · Score: 1

      Lucas also depended on Joseph Campbell for the appropriate mythic elements.

    7. Re:worse than the prequels by SamSeaborn · · Score: 1
      Lucas didn't write Raiders or any of the Indy movies. Notice he gets "story" credits.

      He came up with the idea of making a movie based on the '50s-style action serials featuring a "James Bond"-like globe-trotting archeologist. A lot of King Solomon's Mines, a little Maltese Falcon, a name reminiscent of Nevada Smith Other than that the bulk of Raiders came from screen-writer Kasdan (allegedly, Kaufman's contribution (before he died) was the opening and closing scenes, and his widow fought for a co-story credit).

      George says, "let's have Indy meet his father and go after the Holy Grail", hires a screen-writer to fill in the rest, and *boom* story credit.

      Sam

    8. Re:worse than the prequels by dexter+riley · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe Spielberg should be the one to direct the new Star Wars?

      And through the miracle of CGI, all the roles will be played by Tom Hanks.

    9. Re:worse than the prequels by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      I almost fell on my butt when I saw the giant elephants in Return Of The King. "You mean Lucas stole the AT-ATs from Tolkien??" I had always thought the idea of elephant-like walking tanks was brilliant, turns out he stole that too.

      What're you, retarded? That could've come from anywhere. He could have "borrowed" it from seeing elephants at the circus, or even *gasp* a history book. They used to use elephants like that to haul around crap. The only thing elephantine about gigantic mechanical quadrapeds is the whole "four legs" thing. Maybe he modeled them after Gazelle, or Triceratops? Next, you'll be telling me he stole the idea of spaceships from somewhere else. It's pretty goddamn common knowledge. For you to bring up Tolkien is beyond stupid.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    10. Re:worse than the prequels by Trespass · · Score: 1

      The thing is, in the book they weren't dealt with in as much detail, or as many action sequences. From the ESB skecthbook I used to have the early walker designs seemed influenced by both japanese giant robots of the 60s and 70s and german wwii armor, most explicitly the Tiger I.

      I daresay the oliphant sequences from RotK could have been partially inspired by the AT-ATs, but I think they both came from the common war movie dramatic device of 'man vs. tank'. At least, it seems plausable to me.

    11. Re:worse than the prequels by zuzzabuzz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hannibal is pissed with Tolkien and Lucas, I'm sure.

      --
      -buzz
    12. Re:worse than the prequels by Galvatron · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought it was fairly well known that the inspiration for the AT-ATs are those giant cargo loaders in the Port of Oakland. Nothing to do with Tolkein (or even elephants) at all.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    13. Re:worse than the prequels by SamSeaborn · · Score: 1
      What're you, retarded? That could've come from anywhere. He could have "borrowed" it from seeing elephants at the circus

      Battle elephants maching to war with deadly tusks ... Luke/Legolas climbing one and bringing it down single-handedly ... Lucas' vision of the Hoth battle is *clearly* borrowed from Tolkien. Sorry for the smugness, but this is as clear as the pod-race in Phantom Menance being an homage to Ben-Hur.

      The Star Wars movies are teeming with such references. The more you are exposed to the classics the more you see where Lucas got his ideas.

      Face it, Lucas is *heavily* influenced by other work. Even Jedi is virtually a re-make of Star Wars; starting out on Tatooine gave him a chance to re-do the creature-cantina with Jabba's palace, and the movie is centered around attacking a new death star. I shook my head in disbelief when they ended up on Tatooine again in Phantom Menace -- come on George, there's a billion planets out there!

      SLL

    14. Re:worse than the prequels by Rocky1138 · · Score: 1

      Steven Spielberg would be and has been a good director of Star Wars movies, but really, I'd like to see Quintin Tarantino take one of the lightsaber-heavy battles on :) Wouldn't that be cool?

    15. Re:worse than the prequels by localman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And Tolkein stole it from real-life Hannibal.

      Repeat after me: theme and variation, theme and variation; art is not created in a vacuum.

      Of course there is a line where being derivitive (as all art is to some degeree) becomes a fault. However I think that the original SW (and ESB) added more than enough new elements, or combined existing elements in new ways that it stands as a decent little film.

      Cheers.

    16. Re:worse than the prequels by BrokenStructure · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that would be an AWESOME idea!

      Unfortunately, it doesn't look like it's going to happen.

      Spielberg already asked if he could and George said no!

      (quote)
      Steven Spielberg wants to direct Episode III

      "I've asked him. He won't let me do one." These are the sad words of Steven Spielberg regarding his requests to direct Star Wars being turned down. For years, the director has begged George Lucas for a shot.

      "I wanted to do one 15 years ago, and he didn't want me to do it. I understand why - Star Wars is George's baby." He mentioned he's still very interested in helming a story that takes place in a galaxy, far, far away.
      (/quote)

    17. Re:worse than the prequels by |/|/||| · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yes, Lucas was obviously heavily influenced by other works. Yes, the Star Wars movies seem to spend a lot of time on Tatooine.

      As for the ROTK think with the Oliphaunts, though, I think you're stretching a bit. As a previous poster mentioned, the idea for big 4 legged attack vehicles could have come from anywhere - probably Lucas' team of brainstorming concept artists.

      The Luke/Legolas thing doesn't work either, because Legolas didn't do that ridiculous oliphaunt surfing stuff in the book - only in the movie that came out many years *after* TESB.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    18. Re:worse than the prequels by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that I wasn't the only person to think of the esteemed general....

    19. Re:worse than the prequels by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Maybe Spielberg should be the one to direct the new Star Wars?

      Blaggghh! (the sound of me vomiting).

      The role of Jar-Jar Binks will now be played by Kate Capshaw.

    20. Re:worse than the prequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tester

    21. Re:worse than the prequels by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      "Battle elephants maching to war with deadly tusks ... Luke/Legolas climbing one and bringing it down single-handedly ... Lucas' vision of the Hoth battle is *clearly* borrowed from Tolkien. "
      Ahhh, how incredibly small your world is... it's all movies and nothing else... and your sense of timelines is completely wrong:
      * During battles in Roman times (for one, I have no idea when else, but I'm sure there's other times) Elephants are used as troop carrying mobile siege units.
      * Fast forward a long, long time and we have LOTR in 20th century post war, and within its pages there are descriptions of the giant... oh, what are they called again... elefunts or something, it's like elephant, but not... anyway... Tolkien calls upon history to create creatures that are almost identical in use to what they were in history.
      * Move on a few decades and we have ESB, and look robotic troop carrying mobile siege units... a use of old history brought forward into a technological age in a supurb way, very imaginative really... most works of fiction borrow from reality in some ways, it's how you do it. And as mentioned by another poster... Legolas doin' his thing is NOT IN THE BOOKS... it's only in the movie, and you'd know this if you didn't have such a narrow field of knowledge.

      "The Star Wars movies are teeming with such references. The more you are exposed to the classics the more you see where Lucas got his ideas."
      Which is odd coming from you who has obviously such little experience in the real classics rather than being a 'gee, I wonder if there is a movie of that book so I don't have to read it' crew.

      "Face it, Lucas is *heavily* influenced by other work. Even Jedi is virtually a re-make of Star Wars;"
      I don't know whether anyone disbelieves that Lucas tries to emulate previous success by plagurising himself, but that's a different ballgame.

      "I shook my head in disbelief when they ended up on Tatooine again in Phantom Menace -- come on George, there's a billion planets out there!"
      Um... yeah, but considering that's where the skywalkers are from... it... um... kinda makes sense... it's hardly a lack of imagination, that's a whole part of the story...

      Basically... before you start trying to reference other works, it's probably a good idea to have a real working knowledge of more things than a few films of the last 20 years.

    22. Re:worse than the prequels by violet16 · · Score: 1
      I almost fell on my butt when I saw the giant elephants in Return Of The King.

      I wish you had. I was at that movie too and couldn't see a thing with you standing in front of me.

    23. Re:worse than the prequels by graveyhead · · Score: 1

      some dude has pics here.

      It makes a lot of sense... he lives in the area (across the bay), and they really do look like AT-ATs.

      --
      std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
    24. Re:worse than the prequels by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Jesus fucking Christ.

      Fine, then. Don't watch any movies, don't read any books written since the 17th Century, and don't listen to any music made since the 19th century.

      If you can't handle allusions because they shatter your illusions, hide yourself in a hole.

      Taking an old idea and rehashing it in a new and interesting way is awesome, and it's about all that's left. All the stories that can be written have been written, all the themes that can be covered have been covered, and all the songs that can be written have already been written.

      Get over yourself.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    25. Re:worse than the prequels by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Hey, I was about to respond to another guy to point out the good general, but I thought I'd read further, and sure enough, someone beat me to it hours ago. ;)

      So add me to the list of folks that know Hannibal as an elephant guy.

      Also add me to the list of folks that know that later on elephants were also used by the Indians as, guess what!, troop carriers. I would suggest that Hannibal's use predates the Indians because I believe (but I could be wrong) that the Indians hadn't organized themself into a real warring civilization until Hannibal had already slaughtered thousands of Romans and gone to his own grave.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    26. Re:worse than the prequels by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      "You mean Lucas stole the AT-ATs from Tolkien??" I had always thought the idea of elephant-like walking tanks was brilliant, turns out he stole that too.

      I always thought that was from War of the Worlds, the Martian fighting machines, though they had three legs were otherwise pretty similar in action. (The HG Wells book, not the George Pal movie where they were flying saucers.)

    27. Re:worse than the prequels by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Lucas also depended on Joseph Campbell for the appropriate mythic elements.

      That's another myth George would like you to believe. See Galactic gasbag, "Beneath all the pseudo-mythic Joseph Campbell hogwash, the roots of George Lucas' empire lie not in The Odyssey but in classic and pulp 20th century sci- fi."

    28. Re:worse than the prequels by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I would suggest that Hannibal's use predates the Indians

      No, Alexander predates Hannibal; he fought Indians with war elephants in 327 BC, later he used them himself. Later Indian elephants wre brought to the Middle East for use in war. I suspect Hannibal's elephants were Asian rather than African, African elephants are much harder to tame.

    29. Re:worse than the prequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the George Pal conception of the Martian machines were not flying saucers in the sense of some sort of free-flying craft.

      I'm working from memory here (albeit one that's been watching the movie since about 1966), but I think there's some exposition to the effect of some sort of repulsive field providing lift and traction, and I think that the three small holes underneath the machines plus a subtle shimmery effect was supposed to convey that. At no time in the film did the machines do anything but hover a small distance above the ground (roughly the same as their width or less).

      I know that George Pal was an effects/miniatures man rather than a "director's director," but to me, his conceptualization of the Martian machines was one of the most effective in all of SF film. Even to modern eyes, the machines look genuinely alien.

    30. Re:worse than the prequels by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      Stop it, all of you! Isn't it obvious? Lucas stole the AT-ATs from everyone at the same time! That's right! Tolkien, Hannibal, War of the Worlds... The list continues.

      So stop bickering. Lucas obviously ripped off whatever you can think of - and you can all score cheap points from mods by mentioning whatever comes to mind.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    31. Re:worse than the prequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen AI????

    32. Re:worse than the prequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wait, wait, wait... not sure I'm still tuned.
      Do you say Hannibal ate elephants too ?

      ... Silence of the LamboliphAT-AT...

      ...Should not have missed that one !

    33. Re:worse than the prequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that you do not regard "Pearl Harbor" as a movie.
      --
      AC

  16. Sweet ... by Jackboot · · Score: 0

    Three more times my childhood memories can be ground up and spewed out. Of course, I'll still go see it.

  17. Well, Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course he will. Why would Lucas pass up a free lunch?

  18. No thanks. by keiferb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first trilogy was excellent.

    The second trilogy has, to date, been somewhere between lousy and sub-par.

    I'm no mensa member, but I can spot a pattern here.

    --

    1. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you cant see a pattern forming after 2 inputs.
      you can just see that the first was better than the second.

    2. Re:No thanks. by daeley · · Score: 1

      I can spot a pattern here.

      Me too -- the third trilogy will be awesome! ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    3. Re:No thanks. by hopemafia · · Score: 1

      Two data points always fit a perfect trend...

      Maybe Lucas will authorize their creation and then die...then they might be creative and interesting...or at least interestingly bad, rather than a bland special effects orgy.

      --
      If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
    4. Re:No thanks. by TrekCycling · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "somewhere between lousy and sub-par"??

      That's being quite generous.

    5. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm no mensa member, but I can spot a pattern here.
      nambla member then?
    6. Re:No thanks. by Nasarius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, we have five data points.
      ANH: great
      ESB: excellent
      ROTJ: good
      TPM: bad
      AOTC: awful

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    7. Re:No thanks. by cybermage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm no mensa member, but I can spot a pattern here.

      Well, as a friend of mine is fond of saying: "If you have one point, you can draw any line you'd like. With two, you can draw any curve you like."

      If you have insufficient data, you can use it to support any conclusion you'd like. So which pattern did you spot with your two points of subjective data?

    8. Re:No thanks. by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I thought AoTC, while not a super film by any means, actually sucked far, far, less than Phantom Menace.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    9. Re:No thanks. by XO · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree.
      ANH: good
      ESB: bad
      ROTJ: excellent
      TPM: awful
      AOTC: good

      And I am not a Star Wars geek. I'm a bit more subjective, in that Star Wars has never ruled my life.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    10. Re:No thanks. by Mateito · · Score: 2, Funny
      AoTC ... actually sucked far, far, less than Phantom Menace

      Less to suck a good movie make does not!

    11. Re:No thanks. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's hard to do worse than par these days.

    12. Re:No thanks. by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > If you have one point, you can draw any line you'd like. With two, you can draw any curve you like.

      And that's the underlying pattern behind most humor. Draw two points, pause while the listener assumes the third point in a straight line, then conclude with a third point out on a curve. Hence the term "a curveball" meaning a joke.

      Go ahead, try it. Look at any joke or listen to any comedian.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    13. Re:No thanks. by danieljpost · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wait! Hey! Maybe the pattern will be that the Later episodes will be BETTER.

      Over optimistic at best, but I'd prefer that pattern.

      Just don't let Lucas direct. Or write. I guess we can let him produce some of the visuals....

      --
      We must drive a sword through any hypothesis that is not strictly necessary.
    14. Re:No thanks. by static0verdrive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like a lot of people though, you've seen them all. Where I lose faith in you, you non-geek wonder (on slashdot...), is where you call the Empire Stricks Back BAD.

      --
      ========
      77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
    15. Re:No thanks. by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Your post remined me of a modern mirror. Why is the second movie in a trillogy more or less liek a bride from the first to the last. It's kinda like LOTR:TTT AOTC I think was like this and so was ESB. Is it a rule somwhere that the 3rd installment of a movcire tillogy must have a down ending?

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    16. Re:No thanks. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      WHAT? Get him boys! Star Wars Nerds

    17. Re:No thanks. by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      the common opinion is

      ANH: ****
      ESB: *****
      ROTJ: ***
      TPM: **
      AOTC: **/

      Which, yes, would suggest that ROTS (what a name!) would be */

    18. Re:No thanks. by James+Turpin · · Score: 1
      As any MENSA member can tell you, it all depends on whether you are looking at numerical order or the episodes or chronological order of release. I would argue that since episode I is by far the worse, the you can't beat the bondage scene in episode VI, the pattern really goes according to numerical order of the episodes. Therefore expect the last thre episodes to be spectacular!

      Furthermore, if this continues to be the story of Anaken (sp?) Skywalker, then we could get to see much more "ghosts of the dead Jedi Knights" in action. And that could be cool. Really.

      --
      Mathematics is not a crime.
    19. Re:No thanks. by maxpublic · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm no mensa member, but I can spot a pattern here.

      If you were a Mensa member you'd be spending so much time praising your own intellect and insulting your 'inferiors' the pattern would make a 'whooshing' sound as it flew over your head, unnoticed in the neon glare of your ego.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    20. Re:No thanks. by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      > I'm no mensa member, but I can spot a pattern here.

      Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is a pattern.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    21. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ANH: good
      ESB: excellent
      ROTJ: the muppet show
      TPM: attack of the mincing CG robots
      AOTC: excrement of bantha attack it does

      You see, aside from not realizing that ESB is the greatest film in the series you just were not being subjective enough.

    22. Re:No thanks. by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      I would agree, but the godawful Anakin/Amidala dialogue ruined the whole movie for me.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    23. Re:No thanks. by blincoln · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ANH: good
      ESB: bad
      ROTJ: excellent
      TPM: awful
      AOTC: good

      And I am not a Star Wars geek.

      I think you meant to say "I'm not a person with good taste in films" =P.

      How can you prefer a movie like RotJ over ESB? Let's compare:

      ESB:

      - Has Boba Fett, the ultimate badass.
      - Has a dark, mature storyline.
      - Has excellent writing and acting.

      RotJ:

      - Turns Boba Fett into a dork in armour who gets killed by a blind man (although the SE "macking on the alien chicks" scene slightly redeems him).
      - Ewoks. WTF? WT*F*?

      The Battle of Endor and Luke/Vader duel were excellent, but overall it can't touch ESB or ANH.

      So far the prequel trilogy has been incredibly disappointing. About all I can watch of TPM is the Maul/Jinn/Kenobi fight. AotC has a few decent scenes. The opening is excellent, parts of the chase through Coruscant are good (although I could do without the lame dialogue), and the battle at the end would be awesome if it weren't for the incredibly stupid C3PO jokes.

      If the prequels had come out at the same time as the original trilogy I might be more forgiving, but there have been *so* many good films since then that combine that level of action with deep storyline and characters (e.g. Blade Runner, Heat, Aliens, Firefly).

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    24. Re:No thanks. by scotch · · Score: 1
      Dear Mr. Lucas,

      "Fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again."

      Yours truly, star wars fanatic.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    25. Re:No thanks. by rowanxmas · · Score: 1

      then go see the IMAX version. shorter, with less cheese.

    26. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't see that applying to Dane Cook and he's the funniest comedian ever.

    27. Re:No thanks. by laard · · Score: 1

      Maybe Lucas will authorize their creation and then die

      we should start a charity to finance "the hit"

      --
      --- If we knew half the things we shouldn't we'd stop wishing we knew it all
    28. Re:No thanks. by AzureWraith · · Score: 1

      only episode 4 of the original trilogy was directed by Lucas, the second trilogy was directed by him, the third trilogy therefore should be directed by someone better. If I can recall correctly he doesn't even like directing... (this post is just to state the obvious)

    29. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything in your review of the series makes it clear that you look at Star Wars as a failed attempt at the action genre. That's fine if that's as far as you go.

      However, to some of us, Star Wars is an iconic film series specifically because action is just the frosting that draws in the plebians. The meat of the series is the epic themes that Joseph Campbell introduced Lucas to combined with a distinctly eastern set of philosophies about honor and restraint. Show me any other movie that has merged those two concepts as effectivly as Empire and Jedi did (Ewoks not withstanding), and I'll show you a major hit (Matrix comes to mind).

      The new movies are slow to build, introducing a great many themes and plot threads, but so far they are essentially void of any story save this: the introduction of Anakin/Obi-Wan and the machinations of Palpatine. If Lucas pulls those together correctly in the third movie, the first two will seem much more worth it to people like me, who loved the original movies, and the sextillogy will be worth the wait. On the other hand, if he drops the ball and just goes down the action film route... well, then in that light, the series simply doesn't measure up, and I'd rather go see a Matrix 4 or the next John Woo movie.

      The other way it COULD go, but I doubt (because Lucas is smart, but he's not really a master story teller), is he could walk away from all expectations and tell a story that re-frames the first three movies. I doubt he'll go there, but some hints (specifically about droids) in the last film make me think it's possible.

    30. Re:No thanks. by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Actually there are a few more...

      ANH: Great, no kids
      StarWars Xmas: Dreadful, made for kids
      ESB: Excellent, no kids
      RotJ: Good, would be great except for kid-friendly ewoks
      Ewok spin-offs: Horrible, made for kids
      TPM: Bad, has kids and cartoon characters
      AotC: So-so, no kids except for one scene

      I think I see a pattern here...

    31. Re:No thanks. by bopo · · Score: 1

      I'm no mensa member, but I can spot a pattern here.

      Maybe, but if the pattern for Star Wars trilogies is the same as Star Trek movies, the next one will be awesome.

      I can dream, right? Please?

      --
      "Understand you're having a little Jimmy Page trouble."
    32. Re:No thanks. by thermopylae300 · · Score: 1
      Thou shall not call ESB bad!!!!!!111eleventyone

      ESB and RotJ were so good that I will watch 3 more crappy episodes (just like the majority of slashdotters). If they were good Lucas could redeem himself. If they were bad they would still be really popular because people would see them just to see how bad they are.

      Either way it would be exciting to see some more Star Wars movies where you didn't know what was coming (Assuming, ignorantly, that this would be uncharted territory). Watching a prequel trilogy is like watching the Titanic, you just sit there waiting/hoping for the boat to sink. LotR is an exception for reasons beyond my understanding.

      --
      Before the invention of eruptions, lava had to be carried down the mountain by hand and thrown on sleeping villagers.
    33. Re:No thanks. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > Maybe Lucas will authorize their creation and then die...then they might be creative and
      > interesting...or at least interestingly bad,

      Or on the other hand, they might give it to Rick Berman.

      Chris Mattern

    34. Re:No thanks. by thogard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't that
      SW (aka ANH pre edits): good
      ANH: Lame?

      The last one I saw was the rehack of Star Wars when it 1st hit the theaters. After Lucas messed up a move I watched too many times when it first came out, I decided hes not seeing any more of my money. I haven't even seen the last one on cable TV.

    35. Re:No thanks. by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      Hey, I resemble that remark! Er, I used to...

      No kidding, every newsletter is like "Why Mensa's are so perfect" or "Why Mensa children are our supermen overlords"... it was too embarrassing to continue membership so i let it lapse, but the scars are still there.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    36. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and yet you still mention it...

      I hate to say it, but that's mensa typical.

    37. Re:No thanks. by (eternal_software) · · Score: 1

      Best. Post. Ever.

    38. Re:No thanks. by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      It's also quite common for that curve to loop back around to an earlier joke, typically on the last joke of the set.

    39. Re:No thanks. by Val314 · · Score: 1

      dont asume that everyone shares your tastes

      i didnt like ESB, but RotJ (but i usually just skip the Ewoks part when watching it)

    40. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the continued storyline of the books and the comics Boba Fett does not actually die in the belly of the Sarlacc. He manages to escape from the Sarlacc, although he is barely alive when he gets out.

      I am curious to see what Lucas will do about this part of the story if he does indeed make seven, eight, and nine. Will he do his own thing or will he follow the story that others have helped create?

    41. Re:No thanks. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      The only catch is, we have 5 data points. Here's my personal rating of each data point, and I'll let everybody else point out why they worked out like they did (yes, I know why). Oh yeah, rating is 1-5, with 5 being the best.

      1. 1
      2. 2
      3. This one isn't made yet
      4. 3
      5. 5
      6. 1

      Considering that the actual chronological order of these ratings is 3 5 1 1 2, there is a chance Lucas might pull out something like a 3 for the next movie, and I'll like it as much as I like Episode IV, which isn't actually saying much since I generally don't watch movies again and again unless my personal rating for them is at least 4. So yes, as a matter of fact there's only one star wars movie I really like, although I occasionally enjoy the others.

      But what do I know. I also like Star Trek 5, and I get a kick out of watching Battlefield: Earth no matter how dumb it is.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    42. Re:No thanks. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      (but i usually just skip the Ewoks part when watching it)

      Then what's left? Let's see, the space battle is actually pretty cool. Rescuing Han Solo was annoying because they gave Luke too much stage in those parts. His fight with the rancor is just....dumb. Would have been cooler if they had actually made it clear that he used the force to make sure the skull hit the right switch, instead they made it look like luck. And, oh yeah, the fake tension of Luke 'turning to the dark side'. I think the problem here is Mark Hamill, actually, not the Luke Skywalker character per se.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    43. Re:No thanks. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Rock on.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    44. Re:No thanks. by hopemafia · · Score: 1

      If so, hopefully the world will be destroyed before it is completed.

      --
      If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
    45. Re:No thanks. by hopemafia · · Score: 1

      I was counting trilogies as a whole...since that's how the parent post was worded. And I was assuming that 3 was going to be on par with 1&2, thus making that trilogy bad overall.

      I have to say I pretty much agree with you on the movie rankings though...except for Jedi, which I'd give a 3 (then again that was the first one I saw on original release in the theater, so that may be sentimentality).

      --
      If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
    46. Re:No thanks. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      ESB was one of those that people either liked or hated, with not much in the middle.

      Why? (shrug) I was surprised the first time that I found a ESB-hater, asked around and got a pretty even split of likers/haters.

      My only guess would be that it's a bit of an interlude, things don't go well for the rebels, and it leaves a number of threads hanging for resolution in flick #6.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    47. Re:No thanks. by Sebastopol · · Score: 1



      I'm not disagreeing. I love my high IQ and want to SING IT FROM THE ROOFTOPS!!!

      Stop stop! We'll have none of that!!

      By the way, how do you know so much about mensa? are you one too?

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    48. Re:No thanks. by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1
      Why Mensa's are so perfect
      ummm... Mensa's what are perfect? It is a possesive. It could have also been a contraction, for instance of Mensa is or Mensa has, except that the next word is "are". If I seem like a punctuation Nazi, I apologize. I just read Eats, Shoots, and Leaves: the Zero-Tolerance Approach to Punctuation :-)
      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  19. And um...this is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are no longer any orginal ideas in Hollywood, of course Lucas will keep the franchise rollin'.

  20. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Episodes 7-9 should be made... but that doesn't necessarily mean that Lucas should make them. Personally, I'd like to see him delegate these to another director.

  21. His secret plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    By episode 9, there will be no live actors at all.

    1. Re:His secret plan by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Hey- this gives rise to a possibility that in the New Republic, in retaliation for the racism of the Empire, all the humans get killed off.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  22. I didn't think it was possible by kneecarrot · · Score: 1

    I didn't think it was possible for a sequel to actually change my enjoyment of the original. But, Lucas has managed to do it. The new movies have worn me down. I now avoid my yearly watching of the original trilogy out of bitterness and resentment.

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

  23. Please, don't... by geneing · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I think that episodes I and II are simply dreadful compared to episodes IV-VI. I think it's time to stop...

  24. Great by Goose3254 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Jar Jar Binks and Ewoks team up to make a suckfest...

    1. Re:Great by glen604 · · Score: 1

      Jar Jar Binks and Ewoks team up to make a suckfest...

      that just brought up some pornographic mental images that I really did not need after eating lunch...

    2. Re:Great by DarthWiggle · · Score: 1

      ew.. just.......... ew...

  25. Sounds good to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds good, I'm always up for more Star Wars. Although I don't know who they'll get to do any of parts now seeing as all the original actors are now 30 years older.... then again, things just might just work out thanks to that alone.

  26. Four more beers. by scowling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So far, we've got three movies which don't stand the test of time (the orignal three) and two movies that stand neither the test of time nor of wallet nor of stomach (the most recent pair).

    It's a pretty safe bet that Revenge of the Sith is going to smell like the ass of a baboon, too.

    And yet, finding a SW fan who'll mail nine bucks to UNICEF, instead of going to the midnight show of a movie with a character named Kit Fisto, is like pulling teeth from a chicken.

    Pass. Pass pass pass pass pass.

    --
    www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    1. Re:Four more beers. by slungsolow · · Score: 2

      Maybe this whole thing is just a "guerrila" marketing campaign to get attention to the next installment.

      I wouldn't put it past the bastards of hollywood.

    2. Re:Four more beers. by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      And yet, finding a SW fan who'll mail nine bucks to UNICEF, instead of going to the midnight show of a movie with a character named Kit Fisto [....]
      I remember seeing the first (fourth) movie the day it was released. It was pretty good. I can't really remember seeing the last few, though I know I went to at least the one with the Japanese aliens.

      Having established my lack of credentials, I must ask: "Kit Fisto?" Did you make that up? It sounds like something from a really bad leather movie.

    3. Re:Four more beers. by scowling · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, seriously. Kit Fisto.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    4. Re:Four more beers. by pete-classic · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Kit" means "ass" in Amharic. I'm so disturbed by this.

      -Peter

    5. Re:Four more beers. by bhima · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You are so right! I was so enthralled by the first^w^w episode four as a kid. The second less so and the last two just sucked. What shame!

      Can't we have a cool Sci-Fi movie that is not a warmed over western!!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    6. Re:Four more beers. by Orne · · Score: 1

      Shit, stay away from Firefly then...

    7. Re:Four more beers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you see, at least George Lucas hasn't killed anyone, while money to UNICEF regularly goes into aid that's then diverted in-country by murdering dictators.

    8. Re:Four more beers. by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      Guerrillas? No, they're Wookies. ...I'll get my coat.

    9. Re:Four more beers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's always got bigoted caricatures of ethnic stereotypes in his movies. I'm waiting for the credit-lending character, Moneelovin-Jeau.

    10. Re:Four more beers. by mihalis · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing the first (fourth) movie the day it was released.

      Ohhhhh, nooo, Now I'm really confused. The first (fourth) movie could be Star Wars (first movie released, episode 4) or Phantom Menace (episode 1, 4th movie released).

    11. Re:Four more beers. by bhima · · Score: 1

      I actually liked the series in a wierd goofy way, enough to download all of them (they did not show on Austrian Cable). I have no idea how I found it, but maybe because they're up front enough to have horses it's OK... or it could be the mechanic...

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    12. Re:Four more beers. by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're just growing up and your likes have changed. I was in college when episode IV came out and I found the cute aliens to be a bit much. Not as bad as Jar-Jar mind you, but from the same mindset.

    13. Re:Four more beers. by bhima · · Score: 1
      Cute aliens in Star Wars IV? In the bar scene? Or are you talking the fuzzy midgets in Star Wars VI, The Return of the Jedi. Which to my unending misery are the obsession of a new hire who is a wiz at Pro-E but I can't take the dolls in her office and her desktops!

      But yeah you're right Episode I really showed me that as it was geared to grade schoolers.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    14. Re:Four more beers. by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Cute aliens in the bar scene, cute aliens in the desert, cute wookie, cute robots ...

    15. Re:Four more beers. by UberQwerty · · Score: 1

      And yet, finding a SW fan who'll mail nine bucks to UNICEF, instead of going to the midnight show of a movie with a character named Kit Fisto, is like pulling teeth from a chicken.

      I do hereby solemnly swear that I will mail nine bucks to UNICEF instead of going to that fucking movie. Problem is, that qualifies me as an ex-fan, which I've been for approx. [(now) - (release date of episode 1)] years.

      --


      PUBLIC SPLIT ON WHETHER BUSH IS A DIVIDER -CNN scrolling banner, 10/15/2004
    16. Re:Four more beers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? He's called Watto.

    17. Re:Four more beers. by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Luckily, "Fisto" means "intercouse with a horse" in Amharic.
      Oh wait...

  27. Anybody surprised? by Wind_Walker · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Honestly, is anybody surprised by this move? If there's one thing that history has taught us about George Lucas, it's that he has exactly one master - money.

    If Lucas thinks that he can get money out of the frothing masses of geeks, then he'll do it. Hence, the DVDs to be released this fall, after saying that he would only release DVDs as a full 6-box set?

    I honestly ask, is anybody surprised anymore?

    1. Re:Anybody surprised? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      Or as the anonymous tip on TheForce.net put it, "Of course, since when has the flannel one been consistent?"
      I was very bothered to see that the news outlets printing this quote changed "the flannel one" to just "Lucas". They didn't even bother to use [Lucas] like they should have done to show a substitution of their own. It may seem small, but that is just an example of journalistic integrity gone down the tubes. They just edit the quotes however they feel to make them sound how they want them.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    2. Re:Anybody surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has to do something to support his drug habit, since he's obviously ON CRACK!

    3. Re:Anybody surprised? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Honestly, is anybody surprised by this move? If there's one thing that history has taught us about George Lucas, it's that he has exactly one master - money.

      If Lucas thinks that he can get money out of the frothing masses of geeks, then he'll do it. Hence, the DVDs to be released this fall, after saying that he would only release DVDs as a full 6-box set?

      I honestly ask, is anybody surprised anymore?


      Now I realize it's setting a bad precedent but sometimes these measures are necessary and the course of action is clear. Clearly Lucas is only doing this for the money so there is only one way to convince him to stop. We need to get together enough geeks to pay George Lucas to stop making Star Wars Movies.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  28. Heard from Lucas' office- by Ashyukun · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What? More money? OK!"

    -_-;;

    I'm still clinging to the fleeting hope that the Ep. 3 doesn't completely suck ass. And maybe we'll get lucky and he'll have someone else write/direct/cast/everything the next three...

  29. Just three simple words: by krisp · · Score: 1

    I hope not.

    1. Re:Just three simple words: by GoNINzo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't you mean: Jar Jar Binks?

      Because I don't think the sequel can be stopped by any other three words.

      --
      Gonzo Granzeau
      "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
    2. Re:Just three simple words: by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that Jar Jar did not exist in the original trilogy - only in this "prequel" trilogy. He should not be in a "sequel" trilogy at all.

      The problem is similar to Star Trek -- if you've killed off all the "most evil and powerful" bad guys, who do you deal with now? Star Trek threw in Q and the Borg and a wormhole to widen the available space. What is Star Wars going to throw in? Some descendant of Darth Maul, perhaps. The force behind the emperor and Darth Vader?

      --
      I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    3. Re:Just three simple words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The books have continued past the death of Vader with a new enemy, the Yuuzhan Vong.

    4. Re:Just three simple words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Timothy Zahn's continuation - which most fanboys seem to take as authoritative - features the crumbling of the Empire, the problems the New Republic has avoiding becoming just as bad as the guys they overthrew, Luke nearly going over to the Dark Side under the tuition of a mad clone, a bunch of smugglers who wouldn't hesitate to shoot first, and a cool bad guy called Grand Admiral Thrawn.

      It's much too mature and ambiguous for Lucas, so there's no chance he'd go with that.

    5. Re:Just three simple words: by Beardydog · · Score: 1

      Using Zahn's trilogy would be the only way to catch my attention. I read six or seven books past the movies when I was younger and less discriminating, but Zahn was actually good.

      Ocne I reached "Children of the Jedi" I started coughing up blood. I have no recollection of my actions after that point, and no one can prove otherwise.

    6. Re:Just three simple words: by pknoll · · Score: 3, Funny
      Luke should continue his evolution into a dark lord. Leia can realize her destiny as the Final Jedi and save him. And then go on to become corrupted herself.

      I could go on, but I just remembered I don't care.

    7. Re:Just three simple words: by Autumnmist · · Score: 1

      That's why you must simply pretend that Children of the Jedi and all the Young Jedi books do not and never existed. (There is no Matrix).

      Then go and read the New Jedi Order and the Thrawn trilogy.

      --
      --- "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Ben Kenobi, 'Return of the Jedi'
    8. Re:Just three simple words: by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Luke should continue his evolution into a dark lord. Leia can realize her destiny as the Final Jedi and save him.

      Oh, you mean the Dark Empire ?

      Luke decides to go to the Dark Side without any really good reason, Empire builds new superweapons even nastier than the Death Star, Palpatine gets a new cloned body... Not the finest moment for Dark Horse ;(.

      But I kinda liked how Luke had become an arrogant creep even before he became a Sith Lord. You can just feel the attitude of "I am a Jedi, and you're just a short-sighted worm" reeking from him :).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:Just three simple words: by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Yup yup! I only have read Zahn's books, and I tell ya, I can almost imagine hearing the music from the original trilogy playing, and the voices of the original characters as I read it.

      It's VERY true to the original characters and is a real masterpiece - all Star Wars fans should read this trilogy - even if Lucas doesn't end up making it, for all intents and purposes, it IS episodes 7, 8, 9.

      Heir to the Empire
      Dark Force Rising
      The Last Command

      I'd love to see Thrawn, Mara, Karrde, and all the rest come to life :)

      That said, because it centers on the original characters, it could be extremely tricky to produce.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    10. Re:Just three simple words: by falloutboy · · Score: 1

      With the empire destroyed, Luke runs for President with his loyal Chief of Staff, Han Solo, Communications Director, Chewbacca, and Press Secretary CJ Cregg.

      Star Wars, Episode VIII: Return of the Omnibus Spending Resolution

      I hear they're bringing in Aaron Sorkin to write it.

    11. Re:Just three simple words: by Beardydog · · Score: 1

      Everytime my friend starts talking about the Disney show Tailspin, I wind up saying Talon Kaarde instead of Don Carnage. I prefer to attribute this to the power and beauty of Zahn's writing, instead of the fact that I'm a big fucking dork with bad memory.

    12. Re:Just three simple words: by CanadianCrackPot · · Score: 1

      No no have every race from a Gene Roddenbery SF appear and have a battle royal. SW and the Jedi, Sith et al would be royally fvcked...

      --
      Good programmers drink beer to relieve job stress.
      Great programmers drink hard liquor and work best hungover.
    13. Re:Just three simple words: by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      He should not be in a "sequel" trilogy at all.

      My fondest hope is that early in Ep III Anakin and Amadala get stranded on some remote planet and in order to survive have to slowly roast Jar-Jar over a smoky campfire.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  30. It makes sense.. by slungsolow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No matter how bad he makes the prequels they are still doing well financially. He's releasing the original trilogy on DVD and thats gonna make a good buck. It was only a matter of time before he made the full 9 films he originally promised.

    If we are lucky he'll go with the formula of the original trilogy and let others direct.

    If we are really lucky he'll go out and get someone who actually knows how to write a good script.

    It would be nice to actually see if they can get some no name actors that actually know how to act.

    oh.. and wookies!!!

    1. Re:It makes sense.. by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      And if he does not follow this advice there will be three more movies I will never see.

      I really like the original Star Wars trilogy, the prequels suck.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    2. Re:It makes sense.. by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It was only a matter of time before he made the full 9 films he originally promised.
      AHEM! Maybe some of you youngsters don't remember this, but at one time, (Before Empire Strikes Back even came out) Lucas had said there would be 12 movies. That didn't last too long, and he quickly changed his mind down to 9 movies, so the previous number has been close to forgotten. I did have an old magazine from 1978, which had an article about the upcoming "Star Wars 2" meaning Empire, and his 12-movie plan.
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    3. Re:It makes sense.. by Khomar · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would be nice to actually see if they can get some no name actors that actually know how to act.

      Actually, they did. His name is Ewan McGregor who at the time was an unknown but very talented actor. Currently, he is the only reason why I might see the last film. His scenes were the hilights of the films ("You don't want to sell me deathsticks...") and a breath of fresh air from all of the terrible acting. He somehow even manages to make his bad lines lively and almost believable. It is a real shame that they were not able to make movies to match his skill. I just hope that Star Wars doesn't stifle his career.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    4. Re:It makes sense.. by slungsolow · · Score: 1

      Yes, McGregor was an unkown for most people who stayed away from movies dealing with dead babies wakling on ceiling and the horrible pickle shots and hand jobs of velvet goldmine (way to much of an inside joke)...
      I was actually refering to the wonderful Jake Lloyd and the marvelous .

      There were set pieces that acted circles around them.

    5. Re:It makes sense.. by SmokeHalo · · Score: 0

      It's not just the money. Lucas wants to hang out with Bill Gates some more, and the best way for him to do that is to churn out a flick so he can set up a private screening for Bill and his buddies.

      --
      I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
    6. Re:It makes sense.. by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah, it took me a while to find it, but here is a cartoon on TheForce.net about the changing plans of how many movies.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    7. Re:It makes sense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I got the Trainspotting reference, but what were the other two?)

    8. Re:It makes sense.. by slungsolow · · Score: 1

      I messed up and hit submit before I linked..
      Dead Baby is trainspotting Pickle Shots and Handjobs is from the movie velvet goldmine...
      and the period at the end is supposed to say "Hayden Christensen"...
      Lesson learned.. don't try to tab to preview when you're on the phone.

    9. Re:It makes sense.. by prockcore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      His name is Ewan McGregor who at the time was an unknown but very talented actor.

      He wasn't unknown! Everyone knew him as "the dude from Trainspotting".

  31. Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.

    1. Re:Oh noes! by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1

      Nah, that was just everyone watching Anakin's acting in "Attack of the Clones" on opening night.

    2. Re:Oh noes! by nacturation · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have that wav file as my "Empty Recycle Bin" sound in Windows.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:Oh noes! by Swamii · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I have that sound alerting me when my Soviet Russian Beowulf cluster empties you.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    4. Re:Oh noes! by Johnny2Bags · · Score: 1

      You'd be +5 if there was a "Extra 'Geek' Modifier" ... good idea though - I just copied you.

      http://www.fallenjedi.com/thesounds.html#obiwan

    5. Re:Oh noes! by Brandybuck · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's funny, I have the same wav file as my startup sound in Windows...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    6. Re:Oh noes! by orbios · · Score: 1

      Loke: "What is it, Oobe?"
      Oobedoob: "I can feel the wailing of thousands of nauseous souls. The dim side of the thumb is gaining in strength." http://imdb.com/title/tt0206341/

    7. Re:Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real men turn off both the recycle bin and the delete confirmation dialog box.

    8. Re:Oh noes! by xYoni69x · · Score: 1

      Real men turn off both the recycle bin and the delete confirmation dialog box.

      I thought so too. So I did it. Until one day...

      (Around mid-day) Started writing math homework
      (Around 01:00) Finished writing math homework. Whew! 16 pages!
      (03:55) Accidentally deleted math homework. Not printed yet, since it's the middle of the night and the printer is in another room, a room where people are sleeping. Don't ask how it was deleted. Freak accident involving explorer.exe.
      (04:12) Stopped trying crappy restore-deleted-files programs and started retyping my homework. At least it'd be faster since I'd already done it.
      (07:57) Done. 15 pages this time.

      Moral:
      1. Make backups.
      2. Don't disable delete confirmation.

      I re-enabled delete confirmation. The recycle bin is still hidden from the desktop, since I don't use it. If that sort of accident happens again, C:\RECYCLER.

      --
      void*x=(*((void*(*)())&(x=(void*)0xfdeb58)))();
  32. History repeats itself by DrXym · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not content with raping the childhood memories of fans of the original movies, he's now doing the same for fans of the prequels. All seventeen of them.

    1. Re:History repeats itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... content ... raping the ... fans of ... movies, he's now doing the same ... . All seventeen of them."

      Interesting...

    2. Re:History repeats itself by BrokenStructure · · Score: 1

      How can you'sa say there'sa only seventeen'sa fans, with'sa memorable characters like me'sa?! /me crawls back under his rock and hides...

  33. Thrawn Trilogy by dazilla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If he used the stories from the Thrawn Trilogy, and got a different director, basically only producing the project (taking some cut), they might be ok.

    1. Re:Thrawn Trilogy by Autumnmist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here here! The Thrawn trilogy is so good even Lucas' touch as a producer (hmm I don't think any of the Star Wars Contiuum is good enough to withstand his directing) couldn't screw it up.

      I think a lot of NJO is very made-for-the-movies and pretty good too.

      --
      --- "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Ben Kenobi, 'Return of the Jedi'
    2. Re:Thrawn Trilogy by abb3w · · Score: 3, Funny
      even Lucas' touch as a producer couldn't screw it up.

      I find your lack of faith... disturbing.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    3. Re:Thrawn Trilogy by Autumnmist · · Score: 1

      *falls over in hysterics*

      We're doomed!

      --
      --- "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Ben Kenobi, 'Return of the Jedi'
    4. Re:Thrawn Trilogy by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      Its been years since I've read these, but I'm not sure these would be the best choice for the new movies.
      Don't get me wrong, the Timothy Zahn trilogy was incredible. Part 2 & 3 of the series were extremely enjoyable reading, but there's at least two problems I could see with basing VII - IX on these books.

      First, the main characters are Han, Luke, and Leia set only five years after Return of the Jedi. Even the geniuses at WETA would have trouble making Harrison, Hamil, and Fisher look 30 years younger.

      Second, the books came out when most of us still really loved the Star Wars universe. No one was yet tarnished by Jar-Jar and little orphan Anniekin. The first book in the Zahn trilogy got buy on just the cool factor of being the first book to officially open up the Star Wars universe that was closed for years.
      Heir to the Empire(part 1) didn't really have a climax that a movie would need, while Dark Force Rising(#2) and Last Command(#3) definetly had the makings for movies.

      Still, I would love to see at least an animated series based on these. I would just hate to see Lucas butcher Timothy Zahn's work.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
  34. Re:You're fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I for one look forward to:

    Star Wars VII : Jar-Jar Wars

    Star Wars VIII: Jar-Jar Strikes Back

    Star Wars IX: The Return of Jar-Jar

  35. Can it be true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they going to make the rumored third and final installment to the Ewok franchise?(Battle for Endor ruled!);)

  36. Just NDAs by DrWho520 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lucas Arts personelle are just signing NDA's...that say they specifically cannot discuss Star Wars 7, 8 and 9.

    I can neither confirm, nor deny that statement.

    Although this begs the question, should we ponder if it will happen or if we want it to happen?

    I agree with everyone equally.

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
  37. A POST ON A FANSITE CONFIRMS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wau!!! A trilogy of trilogies!!! This breaking news brought to you by theforce.net, a bunch of rabid fanboys who certainly are unbiased and don't want this to be true more than anything else.

    Wake me when Lucasfilm makes an announcement.

    1. Re:A POST ON A FANSITE CONFIRMS!!! by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a fanboy site speculating, but they're still right. There's so much money to be made for episodes seven to nine NOT to be made.

  38. Uh, oh... by 14erCleaner · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've got a bad feeling about this...

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:Uh, oh... by Akasha · · Score: 1

      That's no artistic saga... it's a money making scheme!

      --
      --Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. -Arthur C. Clarke
  39. I guess the NDA ... by PythonCodr · · Score: 1

    ... doesn't prohibit them from saying that the NDA doesn't say they not allowed to say that the NDA is about the movie titles covered under the NDA ...

  40. American Larceny anyone? by sbergstrom · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for the second and third parts of the American Graffiti trilogy.

    Don't keep me waiting, George!

    --

    Love, Stu
    1. Re:American Larceny anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you see More American Graffiti? So only one part left...

    2. Re:American Larceny anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a second part of AG, AG2 but ron howard wasnt in it...

    3. Re:American Larceny anyone? by sbergstrom · · Score: 1

      If Ron Howard was not in it, then to me, it does not exist. That's my credo not only for George Lucas films, but everything in life. Without Ron Howard, life simply isn't life.

      --

      Love, Stu
    4. Re:American Larceny anyone? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for THX parts 1139 and 1140.

    5. Re:American Larceny anyone? by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 1

      dont forget the 1137 cgi prequels.

  41. In related news... by shirai · · Score: 1

    The originaly Star Wars trilogy has been pushed back another 10 years. Lucas says that he is now spending time on the next trilogy and doesn't have time for the original and he would like to make the original release absolutely perfect.

    In related news, Lucas is rumored to be modifying the original trilogy to match with the timeline of the final trilogy and a special edition of the latest trilogy is being prepared for the same reasons.

    --
    Sunny

    Be my Friend

  42. STAR WARS EPISODE VII: by gwizah · · Score: 1

    The quest for more money!

    Spaceballs invented it, someone had to say it.

    --

    There is no spork.
  43. "I want to be sure I'm the one to fuck them up." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "If I don't make them, someone else might later," said Lucas. "I want to be sure I'm the one to fuck them up."

  44. Now what? by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    A big party featuring the ewoks and the jar jars and some other new alien going "MISA FISA j00SA n00bsa!" Sure and lets add the cousins of Chewbacca to top it off.

    I see this hapenning since its all about money (always was but much more today) but I don't expect storylines like the originals where it wasn't just about some dumb kid who touches buttons and by magic destroys a whole space station with fancy effects which are suppose to enhance the experience. The way episode 1-2 progressed, I just hope for his own sake that he makes something that could compensate for episode 1-2 (can't say for 3).

    1. Re:Now what? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worse yet- Episodes 7-9 could be endless parlimentary procedure of resetting up the galactic senate.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Now what? by RealErmine · · Score: 1

      Worse yet- Episodes 7-9 could be endless parlimentary procedure of resetting up the galactic senate.

      "I can't believe The Gathering Shadow was senate redistricting." -Lisa Simpson

      --
      Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
  45. Uncle George, do I HAVE to? by eGabriel · · Score: 1

    It might be nice to see Mark Hamill as Luke again now that his voice has gone from whiney to the Joker.

    1. Re:Uncle George, do I HAVE to? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Screw that - he should reprise his role from Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back, in the new Star Wars movies! Oh yeah. And Shannon Elizabeth can take over as Leia. I guess James Van Der Beek can be Luke - nobody really cares there. Piefucker can be C3PO. Kevin Smith as a new Sith, maybe. Jason Mewes as Darth Bong, for sure. Snootchie bootchie!

  46. Just one question... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it possible to fashion my lightsabre into a noose?

    1. Re:Just one question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think lightsabers are the best utilities to hang yourself with....

    2. Re:Just one question... by VikingBerserker · · Score: 1

      My God! You took it out of its packaging!?!

    3. Re:Just one question... by seek31337 · · Score: 1

      Sure! I saw some fat kid do it on video, and he gave it to his future sex life, as a gift.

      --
      No SIG for you!
  47. Please... by nzgeek · · Score: 1

    Please for the love of gods no! Just say no George.

    Makes me start to think favourably about all those stupid "Peter Jackson should do the next Star Wars movie" jokes.

    Seriously, if King Kong turns out to be not totally crap, then I reckon PJ could have a serious go at repairing our broken childhood memories of Star Wars.

  48. W00t by Fizzleboink · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dark Jedi Cyborgs here we come!

    1. Re:W00t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dark Jedi Cyborgs here we come!

      Right that was totally different from any villians in the OT!*Rolleyes*

    2. Re:W00t by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      With the death of Yoda, the Racism of Palpatine, the death of both Sith, the destruction of anybody who even remembers the pre-Empire Jedi, and only a couple of half-trained kids, the new Republic will be quite boring.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  49. Interesting by Ignignot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interesting how a post titled funny can be rated insightful!

    --
    I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [i]Interesting how a post titled funny can be rated insightful![/i]

      Maybe the mod wanted to give the guy some Karma, since the "Funny" mod is broken.

    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like the mod wanted to take some karma away from me since there isn't a -1, not funny. I was going for the ironic title interesting getting modded funny. Oh well, I'm too deep for these waters.

    3. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I feel stupid now, I'm so used to no html forums...

    4. Re:Interesting by strictfoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh I feel stupid now, I'm so used to no html forums...

      What makes you feel more stupid? Incorrectly italicizing something, or apologizing for an anonymous post that no one but yourself knows was you?

      --
      I've just signed legislation that'll outlaw Russia forever. We'll begin bombing in five minutes.
    5. Re:Interesting by xargoon · · Score: 0

      Interesting how a post titled Interesting can be rated funny!

    6. Re:Interesting by 14erCleaner · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Funny how a post titled "Interesting" can be rated funny!

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
  50. Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by deathcloset · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He should hand the reigns over to Spielberg - at least for one movie.

    Seriously. Lucas is a great storyteller, but not the greatest writer.

    He's a great filmaker, but not the best director.

    He creates wonderful characters - but doesn't flesh them out as it seems they should be.

    I'm being a little harsh here; I personally think that episode II was pretty nifty (episode I had about 60% nifty): and I've never written a script nor some of the most renound movies of all time.

    But let speilberg take a whack. Lucas created this universe, but I think someone else may be able to wield it in ways never dreamed.

    After all, the greatest swordsmith isn't always the best fencer. The greatest composer not always the greatest musician.

    1. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      He should hand the reigns over to Spielberg

      "And in a flash of light, the light sabres change into flashlights!"

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    2. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by slungsolow · · Score: 2

      Oh god, I hate to see what their combined powers of alterations could come up with.

    3. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. All Spielberg directs is crap

    4. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by nine-times · · Score: 4, Interesting
      He should hand the reigns over to Spielberg - at least for one movie.

      Well, according to rumor, a while back (in the neighborhood of a year ago, maybe?) Spielberg actually requested of Lucas that he be allowed to make episodes 7, 8, and 9. *Supposedly* of course. Also, Lucas didn't say that the sequals wouldn't be made, he said he was tired, and he didn't have it in him to make more Star Wars movies. So, maybe this is news that he intends to turn the reigns over to someone else.

    5. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by Loualbano2 · · Score: 1

      It's too bad Stanley Kubrick isn't around anymore, as I would say he would be my first choice as opposed to Spielburg. Remember A.I., the part with the machine that knew everything? That kind of cartooney stuff is what you would likely see from Spielburg these days. Sorta like Disney takes the pot and sniffs Scotchguard.

      I also think that David Lynch might be a good person to have as a director. Having the Princess turning into 3 different characters for no apparent reason sounds like a good time. Hell, she might even get naked and lez out, I don't have to tell you that would be sweet. You know he would make Yoda one funky motherfucker too. He would probably use that weird midget and his formica table instead of a puppet or a computer, which would rock. And you know he would squeeze that weird ass cowboy in there somewhere. God knows what he would do with Darth Vader when he shows up, probably would use some sort of talking camel or some such oddness.

      Or maybe not. Depends on what drugs you are on that day.

      ft

    6. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      In an interview with Spielberg about the new Indiana Jones movie to be made, he mentioned that he had asked Lucas multiple times to let him direct one of the Star Wars movies. Lucas has constantly turned him down.
      Come on Lucas! Hand it over to THE MAN!
      [cluebat]*thwack*

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    7. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by ckelly5 · · Score: 1

      umm, all three Indiana Jones movies?

    8. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spielb e rg, imbecile, unless you mean to imply he's a t u rd.

    9. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by Dacmot · · Score: 1

      NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

      Are you nuts? Did you see A.I.? Did you see how Speilberg massacred the ending with and extra 30min of flimsy pseudo aliens?

      How about getting enthusiastic talented people who won't write/direct/produce to get more 5 year olds to see a movie they won't remember anyway?

    10. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God no. Spielberg is a fucking abomination.

    11. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irvin Kirshner. Spielberg sucks. Irvin Kirshner directed the best Star Wars movie. I would have loved to have seen him do episode 3.

    12. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

      Yes he did....and Lucas passed him up on it...DUMB move!

      Lucas is great at concepts and excellent at bringing his vision to life.

      He should:
      1. Write the conceptual story line of 7,8,9...Characters, motivations, plot points, over all story and back story...in short write himself 3 novels that tell the story of 7-9 (Yes I too would love to see the thrawn Trilogy Filmed, but I don't think thats what Lucas wants here)

      2. Once done work with a REAL talented Known good screen writer(s) with proven results to develop a high quality script. Actually honestly if they were willing to do it Joss Whendon and/or Kevin Smith wouldn't be bad ideas.

      3. Hand the directing job over to a another director, but stay involved in the production of movies technical aspects, Thats what Lucas is good at...Speilbergh, Chris Carter, or Kevin Smith would be good choices here.

      4. Concentrate on story, NOT whizbang, and integrate back story more fully...there are still hanging questions in the Star Wars Trilogy that have never been resolved related to questions involved in the backstory.

      5. Stop using the same tired old plot devices, they have been very repeatitive throughout the series now.

      6. Live up to Fan expectation, there have been persistent rumors about various things in the Star Wars Community for years. Confirm them rather than shadow or ignore them.

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    13. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1
      But let speilberg take a whack.

      I agree. Let me propose that the first whack be directed squarely at Jar Jar Binks with a light saber, within the first five seconds of the movie.

      That should arouse exhilarant approval from the Star Wars fans and increase box office receipts to record levels. Who wouldn't pay to see the demise of our favorite bashing boy?

      --
      Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    14. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      You may already be aware of this, but David Lynch was actually going to originally direct Return of the Jedi. I believe he turned it down to work on Dune (though I am probably wrong). Would have been very interesting...

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    15. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you see A.I.? Did you see how Speilberg massacred the ending with and extra 30min of flimsy pseudo aliens?


      No, some of saw what really happened. :D

      (I admit the ending threw me for a loop when I first saw it. But after I rewatched the film and understood it, it is one of my favorite endings ever.)

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    16. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by Loualbano2 · · Score: 1

      Actually I did not know that.

      That would have been some shit.

      ft

    17. Re:Didn't Spielberg express interest in directing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, how could someone watch it twice? Torture chamber I reckon, and "one of [your] favorite endings ever" means "damn glad I could stop watching the worst put together movie since Boxing Helena".

  51. The Hidden Fortress by duffbeer703 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you have a chance, look at the special features where Lucas tries to explain how basically every scene from Star Wars was copied from Kurosawa's Hidden Fortress.

    Except for the laser guns, it's the same story in the same film. Even the music is similar.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:The Hidden Fortress by geekoid · · Score: 1

      interesting, but I ahve watched both right after another and didn't find them all the similiar, at least down the the details.

      Where are these special features?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:The Hidden Fortress by agrippa_cash · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the Special Features, but Lucas' may be paying homage to Kurosawa by overstating Hidden Fortress' influence.

      Some elements are taken certainly (Princess, Peasants/Robots), but Star Wars is no more a remake of HF than Kill Bill is a remake of The Bride Wore Black. It is even less of one now that I think of it.

      SW fans will almost certainly like HF, but don't look for Greedo.

    3. Re:The Hidden Fortress by Trespass · · Score: 1

      ANH seemed to me a movie very explicitly about other movies. Watch 'Triumph of the Will' and you'll never see the ceremony at the end of ANH quite the same again.

    4. Re:The Hidden Fortress by still+cynical · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Star Wars music can't be copied from The Hidden Fortress, John Williams put a huge amount of sweat and effort into copying it from Holst's The Planets. Don't believe me? Listen to Mars, see if it sounds familiar.

      --
      Ignorance is the root of all evil.
    5. Re:The Hidden Fortress by gamlidek · · Score: 1

      Greedo? GREEDO?? Shame, shame, shame.

      --
      "In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice, they are not."
    6. Re:The Hidden Fortress by pyros · · Score: 1

      I hate arguing with people who can't admit Williams has ripped off stuff for some of his more memorable movie tunes. One guy citing his music degree as proof that the theme from Jaws isn't a ripoff of Dvorak. I had to just shake my head in disbelief and leave him to wallow in his ignorance after that.

    7. Re:The Hidden Fortress by blamanj · · Score: 1

      Listen to Venus as well. Not as blatant as Mars, but Leia's theme is derivative, too.

    8. Re:The Hidden Fortress by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      You must have been asleep or doing other things. There are so many scenes and plot elements that are identical between the two movies...

      I'm not knocking Star Wars at all, its a great movie. But listening to Lucas trying to explain away dozens of plot similarities was absolutely hilarious.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    9. Re:The Hidden Fortress by Jerf · · Score: 1

      If "Star Wars" is a rip-off of "Mars" (and I presume you mean the main title theme?), then what isn't? I mean, just because you have a song which is martial and warlike doesn't mean that it was "ripped off" from a random previous song that was meant to sound martial and warlike. (By those standards, Mars is a rip off of any number of other tunes.)

      We like to bitch about software patents (and IMHO rightly so) but musicians have it even worse: There are only so many ways to make a martial, warlike song. If you insist on interpreting things broadly like this, everything is a "rip off"... in which case, who cares?

      I defy you to submit an original song for Star Wars that isn't, by the same standards, a "rip off" of some other song from the millions of hours of composed and recorded music.

      The reality is that the tonalities, the harmonies, the basic instrumentations have all been done, and unless you want people to just stop writing new music, you're doing modern composers a serious disservice to accuse them of "ripping something off". Unless the huge chunks of the exact harmony or melody are ripped off wholesale (neither of which apply in this case), you really shouldn't accuse anybody of ripping anything off.

      I've dabbled with composition, but a sum total of perhaps 10 people have ever heard most of it. (It's tolerable, but nothing great.) Nevertheless, I've heard my melodies and harmonies, which I know I wrote from scratch, in other pieces of a more popular variety, some of which I know were written years after my pieces. That's just the nature of music. (I know I wasn't ripped off!)

    10. Re:The Hidden Fortress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My favourite part is when, even though Princess Yukihime does reveal the location of the Rebel base the Death Castle fires it's SuperArrow at Edo...

    11. Re:The Hidden Fortress by RussianBeard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, the similarities to The Hidden Fortress are often pointed out, but there's stuff in ANH that looks like it was lifted straight out of other Kurosawa, too. For example, the cantina scene (Obi-wan lops off an arm, which you then see center frame) bears more than a strong resemblance to the scene in Yojimbo where Mifune's character takes a guys arm off. Later, in the same film (Yojimbo), there's a shot of Mifune popping up a floorboard that looks like Han Solo rising out of the smuggling compartments on the Millenium Falcon.

      I'm probably reading too much into trivial aspects, but it always felt to me like Lucas borrowed more from Kurosawa's cinematic style than his stories. Frankly, if he'd picked up on Kurosawa's ability to write, we'd have been blessed with better movies.

    12. Re:The Hidden Fortress by BrodeCo · · Score: 1

      Naw, it's the Imperial Theme ("Darth Vader's tune") that is obviously heavily influenced by Mars.

    13. Re:The Hidden Fortress by babbage · · Score: 1

      The parallels in ANH to Japanese cinema, especially "Hidden Fortress" and "Seven Samurai", are obvious, but that's not the only source of inspiration Lucas turned to. There's also a lot of imagery & themes taken from American Westerns, particularly John Ford's The Searchers.

      The plot of ANH basically replicates this one, with the most obvious difference being that John Wayne's character has elements of both Luke Skywalker & Han Solo (but then, early drafts of ANH supposedly had these as one character as well). But then you've got the swaggering cowboy (Solo), a mute Indian sidekick (Chewbacca), a murdered family (the shot of Luke's burned out home is nearly identical to one in Searchers, down to the charred skeletons in the yard), etc.

      ANH also has overtones of "The Magnificent Seven", but then that movie itself is a remake of "Seven Samurai", so it's debatable whether or not you can use that example.

      It's interesting to note how both Lucas, and 20 years later, Tarantino, have played homage to both American westerns and Japanese sword movies, while recasting them as, respectively, camp sci-fi and camp crime dramas. I'm already wondering what the next grand cross-pollinator is going to come up with in another couple of decades :-)

    14. Re:The Hidden Fortress by dcam · · Score: 1

      I'm already wondering what the next grand cross-pollinator is going to come up with in another couple of decades

      Sci-Fi? Coen brothers?

      --
      meh
    15. Re:The Hidden Fortress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe it's me, but that one always reminded me of "Let the Medicine Go Down" in Mary Poppins.

    16. Re:The Hidden Fortress by Sailor+Coruscant · · Score: 1

      George Lucas originally wanted to use classical music for the soundtrack to Star Wars. Particularly, the planets. However, Steven Spielberg introduced him to John Williams who suggested doing a full symphonic score for the film. I'm certain that John listened to George's suggestions with regards to the feel of the music.

    17. Re:The Hidden Fortress by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Heh. Seriously, I always thought the theme from Jaws was Dvorak. I love the New World Symphony. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  52. Wookie Say.. by Red+Dane · · Score: 1

    WAAUUUUGGGH! HRRGGGGOOOOAAAH!

    Chewie, no more beggin strips okay?

    Maybe Luke will fall down the center of Bespin again, idiot tatooine moisture farmers :P

  53. Dear God let Lucas die first.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... or if that's a bit strong, maybe just a stroke that would keep him from butchering the sequels as he has the prequels (and the 'special editions')...

    Imagine if Coppola tried to do 'Godfather 4'.. I would have to kill him...

    1. Re:Dear God let Lucas die first.... by strictfoo · · Score: 1

      Imagine if Coppola tried to do 'Godfather 4'.. I would have to kill him...

      Couldn't be any worse than Godfather 3.

      Coppola needs to be shot for Godfather 3 - absolutely tainted my perception of the first two movies. Just horrible.

      --
      I've just signed legislation that'll outlaw Russia forever. We'll begin bombing in five minutes.
    2. Re:Dear God let Lucas die first.... by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Imagine if Coppola tried to do 'Godfather 4'.. I would have to kill him...

      Do us all a favor and invent a time machine, so you can go back and kill him before he makes Godfather 3.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  54. Of course, since when has Lucas been consistent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Episode 3 is any thing like the first two, he'll be the most consistent director at producing overhyped trash!

  55. Arrggh!!!! by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

    Somebody stop this man!

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  56. Re:You're fired! by nacturation · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The fact that you are asked to sign an NDA is fair game. After all, what if you refuse to sign? You could safely say that "I've refused to sign an NDA saying that I won't discuss anything regarding the making of episodes seven, eight, and nine."

    On the other hand, if you do sign it is it legal for them to add into the NDA that you are not allowed to disclose the fact that you've even signed an NDA? You could always then say "Before I sign this, hang on a sec..." [send email to news site before NDA is applicable] "Okay, I'm ready to sign now..."

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  57. Hmm by rDx666 · · Score: 1

    There is lots of possibility for a good set of movies here, simply because they don't eventually tie into episodes 4,5,6. By turning up the creativity meter, coupled with the new freedom, Lucas can direct something good. But if it's done superficially....let's not go into that. I think the main problem with episodes 1,2,3 was that Lucas tried too hard to imitate the style of 4,5,and 6 and at the same time include "modernized" elements (like Jar Jar). It will be interesting to see just what the storyline is. Episode 4 5 6 built up to an epic scale that I would like to see continue. Lucas should shed the old-scifi of Star Wars so far and roughen it up some more (like in the many cool Star Wars novels). Although I don't think they will base 7 8 9 on books...I can almost smell the canon/non-canon flame wars and moaning...

  58. Supposed to be 9 anyway... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 4, Informative

    There were supposed to be 9 chapters anyway, at least thats what the original intention was.

    I don't know when the idea got popularized that there were going to be only 6 movies.

    At this point tho, I think there are many who have a firm belief that there are only the original 3, and I for one can't blame them.

    1. Re:Supposed to be 9 anyway... by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1
      I don't know when the idea got popularized that there were going to be only 6 movies.

      Lucas himself said that he wouldn't do 7-9.

      --
      Why?
    2. Re:Supposed to be 9 anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea that there were only going to be 6 movies got popularized when George Lucas said as much. He said that his original story had 9 chapters, but that he would only make the prequels and not the sequels. I guess he changed his mind.

    3. Re:Supposed to be 9 anyway... by Hobadee · · Score: 1

      Exactly, a trilogy of trilogies. Heck, Lucas already knows what he's gonna do for them, I donno why he doesn't want to do them. I have a StarWars comic book which is basically the script for one of episodes 7-9 (donno which one, cant find it at the moment). Assumming that the comic book I have is based of what Lucas wants for episodes 7-9, it looks freaking awesome. And by freaking awesome I mean totally cool. Some more proof that the scripts are already written - In the game "Rouge Squadron" they have a level in which you fight the "World Devastators". These "World Devastators" are also in the comic book I have, and look/do exactly the same thing.

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    4. Re:Supposed to be 9 anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The rough storylines in the last 3 were condensed to make ROTJ.

      Personally I think that when the old cast gathered for commentary tracks on the new DVD, ol' George saw the potential.

      I can see Hamill playing an aging Jedi Master, dispensing knowledge and mirroring Alec's role from ANH. But I can't see Harrison playing a senile Han Solo who can't remember where he put his hydrospanners.

      Finally, what's the point? Unless you take Thrawn's trilogy and adapt them (which would be fookin kewl) Lucas would have to rely on his corny serial structure, resurrecting Sidious somehow, taking on new disposable apprentices for each of the new 3 flicks, and culminating in a final Boss battle.

      But yeah, rumor has it that Spielberg wants to direct them. That would make all the pain go away.

    5. Re:Supposed to be 9 anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rouge Squadron? As sponsored by Max Factor no doubt...

      It's ROGUE Squadron.

    6. Re:Supposed to be 9 anyway... by 14erCleaner · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't know when the idea got popularized that there were going to be only 6 movies.

      Check out this September 2001 quote from Rotten Tomatoes:

      In an interview with French TV magazine Télé 7 Jour, "Star Wars" creator George Lucas said that he had no intentions of creating a third trilogy to his popular franchise, even though that's what he had originally intended to do.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    7. Re:Supposed to be 9 anyway... by RedFive · · Score: 1

      In the 'Makings of the Empire Strikes Back' book that I bought back in 1980, George Lucas says the Star Wars Trilogy is the middle of a nine part epic.

      The man said it himself

      --
      RedFive jedi_knight111@hotmail.com
    8. Re:Supposed to be 9 anyway... by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      I don't know when the idea got popularized that there were going to be only 6 movies.

      Yes, it was just wishful thinking...

    9. Re:Supposed to be 9 anyway... by turpie · · Score: 1

      GL's original plan was 9 films.
      Then he changed his mind and wrapped up the series in ROTJ by killing off Vader/Anakin. I remember him saying that there was no longer a reason to make eps7-9 because he had finished off the story in ep6 instead.

  59. Carrie Fisher in Bikini's by frankmu · · Score: 3, Funny

    hmm she was hot 20 years ago, but that was 20 years ago. will she be up to the task again?

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    1. Re:Carrie Fisher in Bikini's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carrie Fisher has gained about 60 pounds, in part a result of depression after her husband left her for another guy.

    2. Re:Carrie Fisher in Bikini's by StrongBow67 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They'd also have to de-carbon-freeze Mark Hamill and his acting career. I did like Corvette Summer though.

    3. Re:Carrie Fisher in Bikini's by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      But she can shed those pounds if she got back on the C and H trains!

    4. Re:Carrie Fisher in Bikini's by rudge68 · · Score: 1

      Please no - there has already been one Jabba....

    5. Re:Carrie Fisher in Bikini's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe McGreevey's wife could play the part instead...

    6. Re:Carrie Fisher in Bikini's by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      Ha, I remember watching an outerlimits episode he was in. He still can't act.

    7. Re:Carrie Fisher in Bikini's by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Well, that's what you get from dumping me. I asked Princess Leia a hundred times if she wanted to make out with me when I was a 8 year old kid. But, nah, she had to run for this other guy...

    8. Re:Carrie Fisher in Bikini's by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Leia goes on to be the galactic version of Hillary Clinton. She doesn't have to be sexy for that.

      Lucas said he wanted his characters aged for episodes 7-9.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  60. What I would like to see in 7, 8, and 9.... by Savet+Hegar · · Score: 1

    Is the story line covering the invasion of the Yuuzan Vong. Though I doubt they could summarize the entire saga into 3 movies. They have trouble fitting one book into one movie....let alone 10+ books into one movie.

    Of course...this would only be good if they can capture the ideology behind the Vong and their unique 'religion'. I suspect if this storyline were taken, it would be more episode 1 and 2 crap of too much special effects and not enough plot/story.

    --
    Mod points are pointless when you browse at -1.
    1. Re:What I would like to see in 7, 8, and 9.... by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

      UGH...that whole storyline turned my off to star wars books...

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  61. I heard years and years ago by Trikenstein · · Score: 1
    About the time Return of the Jedi was coming out or had been out for a bit, that Lucas had plans for 3 trilogy's.
    IIRC, after the success of the first two, he started outlining the trilogy of trilogy's.

    Can't recall where I read, saw, heard, this but I recall hearing it.

  62. Timothy Zahn's trilogy would be awesome! by Thrymm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Grand Admiral Thrawn would be awesome to watch. The storly line of this trilogy was well thought out and written well. Of course the main participants of Luke and the gang came in and saved the day like they do in most of the post Episode 6 novels, they would have to get others to play their parts since they are all way too old. The guy who played Chewbacca has a clause in his contract that he must be in any sequels after RotJ, I believe I read that on starwars.com but could be mistaken.

    1. Re:Timothy Zahn's trilogy would be awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would be cool, those books were as good as the originals. Long live the dark fleet!

  63. grand admiral thrawn by ShakuniMama · · Score: 1

    I hope the stories are lifted straight from Timothy Zahn's trilogy on the New Republic's new nemesis... Grand Admiral Thrawn.

    1. Re:Grand Admiral Thrawn by narcc · · Score: 2, Funny

      These aren't the sequels you're looking for...
      He can go about his business...

    2. Re:Grand Admiral Thrawn by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Too bad we don't have Grand Admiral Thrawn on our side. He could glance at Lucas' movies and know exactly what his weakness is and stop him.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Grand Admiral Thrawn by Goobermunch · · Score: 1

      But Thrawn's ability to evaluate a culture only functions when he can look at works of art. That means he can't help us. --AC

    4. Re:Grand Admiral Thrawn by nfras · · Score: 1

      He has already used his anti-force squirrels (I forget what they are called) on Lucas. That was why he went over to the Dark Side and made The Phantom Mince and Attack of the Clowns.

      --
      You call me a pedant? I prefer the term "correct"
  64. seriously by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 3, Funny

    he could shit in a bucket and hopeless sw geeks would fight each other for it

    1. Re:seriously by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Now THAT sounds like a movie!!!

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:seriously by Spackler · · Score: 1

      And he thus named the bucket, Episode I, The Phantom Menace.

    3. Re:seriously by nutbarpsycho · · Score: 1

      and then they'd all complain that it was just a shit in a bucket. I don't think I'll ever understand those people.

    4. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now THAT'S funny. Wish I had mod.

    5. Re:seriously by cain · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where is this bucket? I can't find it on eBay. Link please....

    6. Re:seriously by avisdream · · Score: 1

      This is modded as "Funny"...must be because there's no "Disturbingly True"...

    7. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? A sith with a bucket? Move over!!!

      Hey wait a sec... that's no sith! It's dark and evil looking, though. :/

    8. Re:seriously by Mazem · · Score: 1

      At a Star Trek convention John de Lancie (Q), who had the flu at the time, jokingly auctioned off his half-full glass of water. It went for $60, and the winner drank it immediately.

  65. whoop-dee-doo by cyberwitz · · Score: 1

    A long time ago ... when Lucas was relevant

    --
    [This sig left intentionally blank.]
  66. Whatever... it's all about the cash. by LilMikey · · Score: 1

    After seeing "The Hulk" and "Daredevil" Lucas though "hey, my ignorant slop doesn't look half bad. I can make money off that."

    Seriously, this man should be sued for robbing the world of what could've been extremely valuable pieces of culture that positively influenced the lives of youths as much as the original did decades ago. I don't really care if he's coming out with 3 more. In my eyes, there will only ever be 3 starwars movies.

    --
    LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  67. What about the Books? by MasterPlaid · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that Lucas could run into lots of trouble with sequels conflicting with the enormous, convoluted, and in places, self-contradictory universe of the Star Wars Books. Of course, the solution I propose is to use the Trhawn series as the scripts for the sequels. Does anythone think that this could actually happen?

    1. Re:What about the Books? by bookemdano63 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think he will abandon the books mythos all together and not worry about conflicts.
      I think this is a real shame because there were so many great characters in the books. I like that spidery-type guy who could spin brain cells.

  68. Let Zahn write the screenplays by espace · · Score: 1

    If ep 7-9 are based off of Timothy Zahn's books, they would have some potential. Although if Lucas got his fingers into the screenplay's there would be some issues.

    In defense of Jar Jar: he serves a great role. He's the mascot... I believe every anime I've watched has a mascot... but they were not saying, "Mesa gonna die, massa?"

    1. Re:Let Zahn write the screenplays by matthewcharlesgoeden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No doubt. The Zahn triology is clearly head and shoulders above anything else written in the Star Wars realm.

      Lucas had better base the movies from it; or else I AM GONNA . . . .
      pay the 12 bucks to watch just like everyone else.

      (wimpering sound)

    2. Re:Let Zahn write the screenplays by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I long to see the Heir to the Empire series on the big screen. Just as cool would be the Dark Empire comic series (although the ending would need to be revamped because Empire's End sucked in the most disappointing way), which would be perfect as an animated film with the style heavily reliant on the art by the original guy (Cam Kennedy, right?). I can just picture an opening shot of the Emperor's ungodly huge starship orbiting Byss. *drool*

      Unfortunately, the strength of Heir to the Empire was in the drama, but everyone expects a Star Wars movie to be action packed, so the series would get butchered.

    3. Re:Let Zahn write the screenplays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If ep 7-9 are based off of Timothy Zahn's books, they would have some potential. Although if Lucas got his fingers into the screenplay's there would be some issues."

      No. Zahn had great ideas and the tone was great, but a lot of the stuff didn't mesh. For instance, Luke Skywalker was still a wimp. Still searching for a new master to learn from, 5 years after the destruction of the Second Death Star. Now compare that to Luke in Tom Veitch's "Dark Empire" comic series, which had been written years before the first Zahn book but had been placed on the backburner at Marvel Epic before it migrated to Dark Horse Comics. In Dark Empire, Luke is perhaps the most powerful Jedi Master ever. He destroys an AT-AT by deflecting its blaster bolts with his lightsabre. Yet he detects that there's still someone more powerful than him steeped in the dark side of the Force. He discovers the Emperor still lives, and has been moving his essence to clone bodies. The comic explained that Emperor Palpatine was so powerful in the Dark Side (he is a living embodiment of it - like La Magra in Blade) that it literally eats away at human flesh - thus explaining his appearance in Return of the Jedi. Luke then decides to become Palpatine's Sith Apprentice and tries to destroy the Dark Side of the Force from within. Awesome stuff. Too bad the third part of the storyline (Empire's End) was weak.

      Now compare that with Zahn's stuff. Weak Luke. Mad crazy clone Jedi Master C'baoth, who was nothing more in essence than an evil Obi Wan Kenobi (yes, he wasn't literally, but their characters were opposite sides of the coin).

      Grand Admiral Thrawn. The best, bar none. He's only slightly lower than the Clone Emperor in Dark Empire.

      Mara Jade (Skywalker). Awesome. Its too bad that Lucas later nullified the idea of the Emperor's Hand by subscribing to the Sith "Rule of 2" presented in the prequels.

      The Noghri. Good stuff.

      Talon Karde. Good.

      Winter. The *REAL* Princess Leia. Also good. Fingers crossed that Lucas will actually honor Zahn's idea and show her as Bail Organa's real daughter in Episode III, although he already has way too much to try to cram into the movie as it is.

      The Wayland Storage Facility/Mt. Tantis and the Cloning project. Null-and-void thanks to Episode II.

      Now, combine this stuff and you have a great basis for sequels. However, considering the age of Mark Hamill and Harrison Ford, expect Episodes VII - IX to take place well over 20 years after Return of the Jedi. Lucas wants Luke to be close to what Obi Wan Kenobi was like in the original film (Episode IV).

      The Lynxpro

    4. Re:Let Zahn write the screenplays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucas wants Luke to be close to what Obi Wan Kenobi was like in the original film

      I take it you don't mean 'played by a decent actor'?

  69. I guess it's ok, since someone else will do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess he had said that "he" wouldn't make the sequels...

    And I guess we could use someone else in the director's chair. Say... Spielberg? Robert Zemeckis?

    1. Re:I guess it's ok, since someone else will do it by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 1

      I nominate Tim Burton, personally.

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
  70. Possiblity: by ricotest · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    According to fan site Theforce.net, employees at Lucas's company Industrial Light and Magic have all been made to sign non-disclosure agreements to promise not to talk about the possibility of episode's seven, eight and nine being made.

    Okay so Lucas is keeping his options open, but this seems like hype-building to me. He's going to have to announce the films as soon as they hit production, after all.

    Pretty pointless considering the vast majority of movie-goers of this generation wouldn't care about a new set of Star Wars films. Bland plot, extremely good CGI, overall unenjoyable. The only real hope is that eps 7-9 would be free of the constraint to match the story up with those coming later. Lucas is pretty much free to cover any ground he wants (assuming he'll ignore the books) and produce a more enjoyable set of films.

  71. There goes the EU... by t1nman33 · · Score: 1

    Expanded Universe, not European Union. :)

    Now, the same thing happened when the new Star Wars novels came out, since there had already been a hypothetical "Post-Jedi" timeline established by the old Star Wars Marvel comic. And Lucas has been very clear on saying that anything not in the movies is only a "what if" rather than official Star Wars canon. I mean, he's had no problem tromping all over stuff that WAS canon (Han shooting first, etc.), so I guess wiping out years of speculative storytelling is no big deal.

    Unless he were to use some of the existing EU storylines in new movies...hey, you think Bothans would make good plush toys?

    --
    --- Where's my car, and why are these grass stains on my pants?
  72. Re:You're fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And once he's given in to making 7, 8 and 9, why stop?

  73. Re:You're fired! by escher · · Score: 1

    Maybe if they made a zillion and one Jar Jar clones and then kill off each one in a horrible, ungodly painful manner? I'd watch three movies of that.

  74. There's somebody you should talk to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you say "Jar Jar" you lose a testicle.

  75. GAAAAH! by genner · · Score: 1

    You know it's going to happen but it still hurts seeing it in print like this.

    1. Re:GAAAAH! by genner · · Score: 1

      sobb...I'm...sob..I'm om...just have to remember the good times..those orginal movies where great...back before.....before...SOB!...JARJAR...WAAAA!

  76. Re:Great! Warning spoiler by justsomebody · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, SW1,2,3 fucked up story line in such matter that not even one more movie and reedited 4,5,6 couldn't bring it back.

    In parts 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 (or 7,8,9) you can expect that final truth will be revealed, Luke is in fact illegitimate son of Christel and Steven Carrington (here is the surprise twist that Lucas was carrefully preparing for last few years, Steven is supposed to be gay, but Lucas will show that all the facts were run by money play in Dinasty) and 3PI0 gets killed with can opener from sundays commercial. Oh, yeah Ewoks that were cut from part 6 are now replaced by alieans who resined their role in Alien vs. Predator sequel (Thay are fed up that they loose every time, and wait with thrill to replace Ewoks in now completely new "Aliens dance").

    --
    Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
  77. To paraphrase the Emperor... by the_skywise · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Young fool... only now do you begin to understand..."

    "And now, young Skywalker... you will watch more of my movies!"

    BAAAZAPZAPZAPZAPZAPZAPZAP!!! "Jar Jar appears in Episode 8 as leader of Naboo!", "Han Solo was never freed from the caronite in Empire, that was his clone!" "Boba Fett ISN'T DEAD!!!"

    AUUUUUGHHH!!!

    FATHER! PLEASE!

    1. Re:To paraphrase the Emperor... by Anonymous+Commando · · Score: 1
      Boba Fett ISN'T DEAD!!!

      Actually, in the Expanded Universe (short stories, books, comics, etc.), Boba Fett isn't dead. Just thought you'd like to know.

      (Yes, I know - I'm a hopeless SW fanboy)

      --
      Corporate Jenga: You take a blockhead from the bottom and you put him on top...
  78. NJO by jorenko · · Score: 1

    Any and all new Star Wars content should be scrictly limited to an NJO (mini?)series.

  79. Critiques of the movie aside.... by StressGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The storyline is kinda left wide open. I mean if Anakin was supposed to bring balance to the force, wouldn't that imply the between Luke and Lea, one becomes Jedi and the other Sith?

    I'm wondering if not having all your original parts ultimately makes you more vulnerable to the dark side as well? - which would imply that Luke would ultimately turn to the dark side (presumably after training Lea).

    Might explain why Dooku did not kill Anakin outright but instead severed his arm and could imply that Vader cut off Luke's hand by design as well. ....oh well, just musing.....

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Critiques of the movie aside.... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      My theory is...

      In Eps 1 and 2, you see there are scores of Jedi. A LOT of them, and more young kids in training.

      It is even said that they no longer could use teh force effectively to foresee events and whatnot.

      The "lawn had become overgrown," if you will.

      And Anakin was the lawn mower. By the time he was done, the number of Jedi was practically non-existant, and foce-sensitive beings were dwindled down to a small few.

    2. Re:Critiques of the movie aside.... by Autumnmist · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your questions are all answered in the Star Wars books, which, by the way, are far better than any of the movies.

      The source and workings of the Force is explained in the most recent series, the New Jedi Order (much better and more shocking than its humdrum title appears) -- NJO features the New Republic nearly being annihilated by a race of aliens, the Yuuzhan Vong, who are not affected by The Force.

      --
      --- "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Ben Kenobi, 'Return of the Jedi'
    3. Re:Critiques of the movie aside.... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > which would imply that Luke would ultimately turn to the dark side
      > (presumably after training Lea).

      Anyone who's actually met a real, live female would know it's gotta be Leia who would turn out to be a Sith. Men are from Mars, Women are Evil, ya know. :)

      Also, to anyone who thinks the published books represent what Lucas would do with the series really doesn't get it. Lucas doesn't care about the books - only the movies are 'canon' in the Star Wars universe. Well, that and the money they bring in for Lucas.

    4. Re:Critiques of the movie aside.... by mesmartyoudumb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Normally I don't let the ultra Star Wars Dork side of me out, but you have blasphemed!

      Before Anakin, The Jedi council reigned supreme, there were thousands of "light" Jedi, Whom were trained by Yoda in Jedi Academies.

      I don't know what Obi Wan and Quigon Jin were thinking when they said "Anikin will bring balance to the force", Because well..the scales were tipped heavily in their favor. They hadn't even seen a Sith in hundreds of years.

      Anakin brought balance alright, He became Darth Vader, the most powerful jedi ever, In fact - He, with the help of Bohba Fett, killed Jedi by the thousands.

      He killed everyone but Obi wan and Yoda, Leaving 2 Jedi and 2 Sith. There can never be more than 2 of each now, This is why ObiWan died, And why Yoda died; To keep the balance. Master and Apprentice.

      Stop laughing..I'm cool in real life, honest! :(

      --
      "Comedy's a dead art form. Now tragedy, that's funny."
    5. Re:Critiques of the movie aside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While your post is well thought out and reasoned, I still can't get over that "Dooku" name! MAN!

    6. Re:Critiques of the movie aside.... by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

      So with Yoda's Death I see the passing of Master to Luke...however who is the apprentice? Leia?
      I suppose however we never see any of this she barely ever takes any account of her Jedi side in later books based in the Star Wars Universe.

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    7. Re:Critiques of the movie aside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm wondering if not having all your original parts ultimately makes you more vulnerable to the dark side

      Mmmm'kay. But men have more "original part" to begin with don't they? I would understanding chopping that part off, however; it truly is the source of all evil. :-D

    8. Re:Critiques of the movie aside.... by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 0

      "I don't know what Obi Wan and Quigon Jin were thinking when they said "Anikin will bring balance to the force", Because well..the scales were tipped heavily in their favor. They hadn't even seen a Sith in hundreds of years."

      No, I think Lucas meant that Anakin restores balance to the force by throwing the Emperor to his death at the end of ROTJ.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    9. Re:Critiques of the movie aside.... by Mant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Normally I don't let the ultra Star Wars Dork side of me out,

      It shows, becuase boy are you wrong. Watch as I out dork you :)

      Anakin brought balance alright, He became Darth Vader, the most powerful jedi ever, In fact - He, with the help of Bohba Fett, killed Jedi by the thousands.

      We haven't seen episode 3 yet, but nothing suggests he becomes the most powerful Jedi ever. Maybe he would have been, but he falls in the lava, becomes half machine and turns Sith (maybe not in that order). While he is a Jedi he isn't more powerful than, say, Yoda, and Obi Wan beats him, although when we see the fight that be partly through luck.

      While the Empire crushes the Jedi, it isn't like Darth Vader goes around and kills them all personally, or anything suggests Boba Fett helps. Based on what we have seen of Fetts vs Jedi, I can't see him as much use.

      He killed everyone but Obi wan and Yoda, Leaving 2 Jedi and 2 Sith. There can never be more than 2 of each now, This is why ObiWan died, And why Yoda died; To keep the balance. Master and Apprentice.

      OK, the last is just complete bunk. At the end of Jedi, there are no Sith at all, and 1 Jedi. Nothing suggests Luke can't find and train a bunch of people to be Jedi. Nothing at all suggests only two ever.

    10. Re:Critiques of the movie aside.... by x-kaos · · Score: 1

      Anakin did bring balance to the Force in ROTJ, didn't he? In the end HE killed the Palpatine when it really counted. He came through and was the balance Quigon and Obi Wan were going on about it just took him seeing his son suffer before he let it come out. So yea, I call that bringing balance :) Or maybe I'm reaching! Let me know what you think!

    11. Re:Critiques of the movie aside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The storyline is kinda left wide open. I mean if Anakin was supposed to bring balance to the force, wouldn't that imply the between Luke and Lea, one becomes Jedi and the other Sith?

      Hmmm... a bad-assed Princess Liea, changes into Bondage Queen Liea in a dark leather outfit which reveals all the naughty bits!

  80. Irvin Kershner by slashd'oh · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're referring to: Irvin Kershner

  81. Grand Admiral Thrawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hope that Lucas brings in Grand Admiral Thrawn from the trilogy written by Timothy Zahn. As I understand, Zahn was the one given permission to write the story of what happened after the destruction of the death star.

    Then again, Lucas and the 'right thing' are two ideas which just don't seem to go together very well.

  82. I wonder by TCaM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how they are going to work in the Space Pepsi.

  83. In a word, Marketing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep in mind that they're not totally clueless up there at Skywalker Ranch. It's quite possible that they read the forums (including Slashdot), they've seen the preliminary edits for Revenge of the Sith, observed the dilution of the brand, heard straight from George Lucas that Lucas isn't giving up control, and reasonably believe that the franchise is in decline.

    The NDAs can kill two birds with one stone. Not only do the rumors re-ignite fan speculation and interest, it prevents employees from confirming or denying that there is future work to be done.

    Believe it or not, some of us have already written off the francise. "Since Lucas is directing Revenge of the Sith, they might as well call it Return of the Suckage." The best way to get us faithless to start talking about Star Wars again is to offer the tantalizing prospect of a new trilogy that does not make the same mistakes of the first one.

    See? They even managed to sucker me into posting a Star Wars comment. The power of the Force...

  84. all pr0tman's gritz are belong down my pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for great yoda!

  85. It's ok to cry... by Lovedumplingx · · Score: 0

    ...just let it all out.

  86. The search for more money by fluor2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The search for more money

    1. Re:The search for more money by DraKKon · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that Lucas was going to Make Spaceballs 2?

      (Spaceballs 2: The Search For More Money)

      --
      "It's not like your minds are as open as the source you love..." - Me to the majority of Slashdot.
    2. Re:The Search for More Money by lewp · · Score: 1

      Now there's a movie that could use a sequel!

      --
      Game... blouses.
  87. Honestly... by SightlessMind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I didn't mind episodes 1 & 2 or the 2nd and 3rd matrix movies. You just have to be honest with yourself before you go in the theatre. Accept that the acting and plot may be horrible, and wait patiently for the special effects and fight scenes. It seems that half the purpose of the movie is to have something to talk about whether it be good or bad.

  88. Re:Funny...(don't fool yourself) by gosand · · Score: 1
    Funny how a couple hundred million can make someone change their minds :) On the otherside its all just rumors until the cameras start rolling....

    I'll bet that he would try to get this deal inked before his next stinker hits the theaters. I didn't see EPII in theaters, and I won't go see EPIII either. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice... can't get fooled again. It was (barely) worth a DVD rental. But it was only about 1 hour long, what with all the fast-forwarding.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  89. Jar-Jar by Cyrgo · · Score: 0

    I'm not worried about Jar-Jar, his abscence in ep. 4, 5, and 6 may be easily explained: he could have been in Alderaan during the blast.

    What worries me is that Lucas will certainly create a new insufferable character for 7, 8, and 9. Maybe Jar-Jar had a grandson? :-p

    I wonder if Lucas will call Mark Hamill, Carrie Fischer, and/or Harrison Ford back?

    1. Re:Jar-Jar by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      Mark and Carrie still do the fanfest circuit thing, so i'd count on them particpating if asked. Ford said in an interview years ago that he'd at least cameo in it.

    2. Re:Jar-Jar by Crash+McBang · · Score: 2, Funny

      Behold the Unholy Union of Clan Binks and Clan Fett, Jar-Jar Fett!
      Or is it Boba Binks?

      I'm tired.

      --
      To put a witty saying into 120 characters, jst rmv ll th vwls.
  90. ha-ha by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

    for years, i've known that Lucas would never let his best money-maker die.

    and i'm also betting that there will be more star wars movies made after Lucas dies.

    after all, star trek didn't die with Roddenberry...

    1. Re:ha-ha by kalidasa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and i'm also betting that there will be more star wars movies made after Lucas dies. after all, star trek didn't die with Roddenberry...

      You haven't watched Enterprise much, have you?

      Hey, someone had to say it...

    2. Re:ha-ha by White+Roses · · Score: 1
      after all, star trek didn't die with Roddenberry...

      Yeah it did. They're basically just beating a dead horse now. Some would argue that horse was dead before Voyager . . . some before DS9.

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
    3. Re:ha-ha by taustin · · Score: 1

      Nosferatu don't count as dead, despite not excatly being dead, either.

    4. Re:ha-ha by Mazem · · Score: 1

      The whole of DS9 and the last seasons of TNG, arguably the best seasons of Star Trek, were made after Roddenberry's death.

  91. Re:You're fired! by juanfe · · Score: 1

    That's not how NDAs work. You sign an NDA saying that you acknowledge that you'll hear stuff that's private and that you agree not to disclose it outside of the circle of people who are bound by the agreement. Anyone who wrote an NDA with the specifics of what is not to be discussed would be a fool.

    --
    ***Foucault is watching you..***
  92. Re:Great! Warning spoiler by XO · · Score: 1

    What do you mean they fucked up the story line? They follow the story perfectly, except for the mitochondrians thing, which apparently got dumped anyway. So, that was some heretical speaking about the faith of the Force. Or some crap like that.

    What got fucked up is just the fact that Ep 1 sucked. The story line was fine, the whole movie blew ass chunks, though.

    At least Jar Jar grew up, though he still has a really annoying voice. bleah. I hope he dies at the hands of Darth Sidious or even better Lord Vader, in Ep 3.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  93. Lots of hype but.... by Aceto3for5 · · Score: 1

    I hear they are just gonna take about 10 hours of In-Game footage from Star Wars Galaxies and splice in some explosions and gold bikini's here and there.

  94. Re:You're fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Maybe if they made a zillion and one Jar Jar clones and then kill off each one in a horrible, ungodly painful manner?

    What like in the back of a Volkswagon?
  95. Hi$ Rea$oning by red+floyd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Luca$ ha$ excellent rea$on$ for making $uch a trilogy. After all, he ha$ $uch a large $tory to tell....

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    1. Re:Hi$ Rea$oning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      H€¥, $tar War$ i$ popu£ar a££ ov€r th€ wor£d.

      You know Lucas would run this joke into the ground, why should we be any better? :p

    2. Re:Hi$ Rea$oning by Maxime+Lefrancois · · Score: 1

      That was brilliant, seriously, good job.

    3. Re:Hi$ Rea$oning by kahei · · Score: 1

      ¥es.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    4. Re:Hi$ Rea$oning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ¥$

      8-P

  96. Give it more time by Thieron · · Score: 1

    He should wait another 15 years until people are clamoring for more Star Wars and have forgetten the leasons of the past. This way he'll also have time to put out the Ultimate Special Editions of the Original Trilogy with all new Jar Jar scenes and the new Super Special Remastered Editions of the Prequels in the Super 18 disk combo pack with your very own Jar Jar.

  97. *sigh* by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Not interested.

    You know what would make me interested? If Lucas could only spend $10 million per movie. Why? Because then he'd have to think more about how to make them interesting. Maybe with a challenge, he'd be forced to do something interesting.

    So why do I feel this way? I have the Back to the Future triology on DVD. Somewhere in that DVD, they mention that in the original script getting the DeLorean back to the future would have resulted to a little journey to the testing of a nuclear bomb in the desert side of the USA. Unfortunately, they had no budget for doing that kind of set, so they kept it in Hill Valley. Hence, the lightning strike idea was born. I'm hoping (crossed fingers here) that if Lucas were to actually hit some of these limitations instead of having his original ideas be 'possible' with all the neato technology they have at ILM, he'd have to revise his ideas a few times and something interesting would be born.

    This is not a guarantee, of course, but I'd at least have interest in another trilogy if he had SOME kind of hurdle to overcome.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:*sigh* by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      YOu may have inadvertently hit upon the reason the first couple of star wars movies were actually good. The first one, if you recall, was a low-budget film. I mean, sure, he had backing and all, but not enough to make the movie he wanted to make (or so he said after it was made. After ESB he said *that* was the movie he wanted to make, and i hear he's disowned it since then).

      But in all the Making Of... documentaries, you always hear "We wanted to so *this and this* but we didn't have enough money, so we did *this* instead".

      By the time it was time to make ROTJ, he was rolling in so much money he could do whatever he wanted, and that movie was much more about showing off what he could do if he had enough money to begin with, and thus began the decline of the franchise.

      Good observation, I think. Thank you. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:*sigh* by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Good observation, I think. Thank you. ;)"

      Appreciated. :)

      I firmly believe this is why X-Files was so interesing to people. Left a lot to the imagination. I hate to think what that show would have been had they had a more extensive budget.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  98. Burned-out Mark Hamill will be perfect by AntonVoyl · · Score: 5, Funny
    for the role of burned-out Luke Skywalker. They can build the whole trilogy around him as antagonist!

    Carrie Fisher can play the harpy Leia. Billy Dee Williams and Harrison Ford will make great smugglers in dotage. This could be really dark. . .

    --

    sig semper tyrannis!
    1. Re:Burned-out Mark Hamill will be perfect by holiggan · · Score: 1

      too dark, too good, too obvious :D I think that Lucas would follow the "less obvious" route and simply rewrite all that we know about the Star Wars universe in the post-RotJ years...

      --
      "A sysadmin is a cross between a detective, a police officer, a gardener, a doctor and a fireman"
    2. Re:Burned-out Mark Hamill will be perfect by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Grumpy Old Spacemen? They already did that one--it was called "Space Cowboys".

      Chris Mattern

  99. Heir To The Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I woul love to see Tiomthy Zahn's _Heir To The Empire_ trilogy translated to film. I started reading the book(s) with a healthy degree of skepticism and was pleasantly surprised at how good they were. I thought Zahn did a great job of creating new stuff and remaning faithful to the old stuff.

    The only reservation I have is in the casting of actors for these new films. I rather see a cast of relative unknowns (like the first go-round) than to have everything utterly destroyed by having Ben Affleck play Han and Kate Hudson playing Leia.

    Bring back Billie Dee as Lando, though!

  100. No one cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you shouldn't either.

    Slashdot: Rumors for retards, stuff to rant about.

  101. More proof... by jeff13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. that my childhood is being "re-invisioned" then resold to children today.

    The poor kids... all they get are hand-me-downs.

    Thank goodness for Harry Potter.

  102. Based on existing novels? by DrEnter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please, oh please, Mr. Lucas, tell me you would base these on one or more of the existing series of Star Wars novels set in that timeframe, many of which were well written and thought out. I wouldn't presume to recommend anything specific, as I've only read a few (good and bad), but there is a lot of worthwhile material out there. It would be a tremendous disservice to both those authors and your fans to disregard or ignore it!

  103. Only in your mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the amount of tickets sold for the first 2 movies, you're in the minority.

    Admit it, the only reason you don't like them is because posters on /. told you not to like it.

    bunch of mindless sheep.

  104. and in the final scence by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 1

    you'll see George Lucas masturbate into a giant pile of cash,

  105. Says who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There were supposed to be 9 chapters anyway, at least thats what the original intention was. I don't know when the idea got popularized that there were going to be only 6 movies.

    Says who? Got a reference for this claim?

    As an aside, I was looking at my "Star Wars Annual Number 1" I recently re-discovered in my attic. There's a cute paragraph in there about how it is rumoured that Lucas *may* be considering making a second film.

    1. Re:Says who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go back to the early interviews with Lucas, it is definitely stated there will be nine movies(some sort of "making of SW" documentary.

      Later, he might have recanted, but the idea was there.

      So this is all non news. Welcome to 80% of /. content.

  106. But this is GOOD news!!! by Zaranne · · Score: 1

    Cuz it keeps all the little Star Wars Fansites going for a few more years. We were all beginning to wonder what was going to happen to us after Episode 3.

    Now, I can STILL get all those sex-crazed Star Wars geeks to come over to the Filth Forum at http://phatooine.net/

    This is cause to celebrate...bring on the dancing girls!

    --
    So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
  107. 9 Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    9 Star Wars movies? Wouldn't Lucas be dead by the time they're all finished?

    1. Re:9 Star Wars by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't Lucas be dead by the time they're all finished?

      Only if we are lucky.

  108. Just the DVD release? by Tokens · · Score: 1

    I wonder if these three new films are actually the DVD-release of the first three episodes. From what I have heard they certainly look to be totally different films from the original release.

  109. Its all about the money.... by Thieron · · Score: 1

    If he can put out movies like the Prequels and make hundreds of millions why not put out 3 more. I'm sure the writing and directing must be so tiring for him but....

    The only hope is that he really does decide that he can't handle the workload of making hundreds of millions on the most basic writing anyone could come up with and have someone else write and direct it.

    If you want an idea of what Lucas thinks of the art of filmmaking (and basically what he has managed to build his entire empire, hee hee, off of). Check out this from an interview with Gary Kurtz, a producer on Star Wars and Empire.
    http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/376/376873p1.htm l

    In reference to Lucas' changes in going from Amaerican Graffitti to Empire.

    "I think the most unfortunate thing that happened was the fact that Indiana Jones came along, and Raiders of the Lost Ark had come out in between. George and I had many, many discussions about that, but it boiled down to the fact that he became convinced that all the audience was interested in was the roller-coaster ride, and so the story and the script didn't matter anymore."

  110. Admiral Thrawn on the Big Screen!!! by Carcass666 · · Score: 1

    Knowing Lucas, he's probably getting ready to cast Ben Affleck or Leonardo Di'Caprio as Thrawn.

    1. Re:Admiral Thrawn on the Big Screen!!! by Kippesoep · · Score: 1

      OMG. That actually sent shivers down my spine, and not in a good way. Thrawn is (IMHO) quite possibly the best character in any of the SW books. Who would be up to the task of portraying him?

  111. Before you do that, you'd better ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    let Greedo shoot first.

    You don't want to appear less than heroic.

  112. Natalie Portman by gulfan · · Score: 2, Funny

    As long as Natalie Portman is casted into it somehow, as say, Leia's daughter and wears a Bikini I'm sure it'll be a box office hit.

  113. All Digital Actors by piett134 · · Score: 1

    Lucas likes to shake things up, maybe this will be the first sequels where the main actors have been replaced with all CG copies of themselves :)

  114. Should you be surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People blast Kerry for flip flops? Lucas flip flops on episodes 7-9 more!

  115. Duke Nukem Forever has an NDA too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just because there's an NDA... doesn't mean there will ever be a product.

    1. Re:Duke Nukem Forever has an NDA too by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      No one is denying that DNF is being made. GL has flat out said, "No 7,8,9, so bug off, you fucking fanboys, get a life...after Episode III comes out of course"

      I do believe that is a direct quote.

      --Joey

  116. thelogic is compelling by Madcapjack · · Score: 1

    6 bad movies must be better than 3!

  117. Re:You're fired! by jasonbw · · Score: 1

    well, he's already 60, so eventually he'll get old and feeble and start thinking of crappy ideas like making greedo shoot first and-

    oh crap.

  118. Wait... this is old news by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
    Remember that it was mentioned a year ago that Peter Mayhew's (Chewbacca) contract also had the NDA in it. I'm sure everyone's has it in it - including people who would never come back (Jake Lloyd, Terrance Stamp, etc.).

    This is legal CYA. That's it. Maybe he will do 7-9, maybe he won't. The NDA cannot be taken, however, as an indicator that he will.

    Unbunch your panties, fanboys and Lucas-hatas alike, and go find something else worth discussing.

  119. sign the petition by holmengraa · · Score: 1

    to have peter jackson make them

  120. YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we'll finally get to see Jar Jar return as the new master of the dark side.

  121. Re:You're fired! by Selfbain · · Score: 1

    He should make all three movies as he normally would and splice in shots at random times showing Jar Jar being horribly tortured. It would probably balance into a watchable film.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
  122. Why do you all get so worked up about this? by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

    I've enjoyed every single Star Ward movie I've seen, including the new ones. If you re-watch the original movies, then watch the new ones, they're all very much along the same vein. Simple, clear storylines; mostly predictable plot; silly alien characters and situations; and some nice special effects.

    Am I alone in this?

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:Why do you all get so worked up about this? by east+coast · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you re-watch the original movies, then watch the new ones, they're all very much along the same vein. Simple, clear storylines; mostly predictable plot; silly alien characters and situations; and some nice special effects.

      Aside from JarJar Binks I think I know what the real downfall of the Star Wars series is...

      It's people who are now in their early 30s trying to relive the "magic" of their youth through, what was at the time, the biggest thing in their life. Now that they're older and the silliness isn't what they grew up on they think it's just idiotic. Star Wars was to my generation (I'm 31) what Shrek or Harry Potter is today to 8-12 year olds. If they make another Potter film in 2019 you're going to hear the same thing from the 30-something crowd about how it was different for them and the new films are only meant to appeal to the young crowd.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Why do you all get so worked up about this? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Moderate +1 for brutal honesty.

      Seriously though I couldn't agree more. A lot of people here suffer from the "good 'ole days" syndrome, for these people their was no way that the new movies could live up to the expectations. I think it's also why so many fanboys are upset with AVP, which I though was a good movie.

      I've been trying to figure out what to call these people. The ones that are so upset by the fact that "the new movies are ruining my memories or childhood", "are destroying our culture" and "Han shoots first" Maybe these people should be called Fanboy-Purists. The attitude that anything that would in anyway ruin the original must be heresy.

      Repeat after me: "It is only a movie"
      You don't need to see it no one is pulling a Clockwork Orange thing here and forcing you to watch it.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    3. Re:Why do you all get so worked up about this? by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes and no. On a personal level, if one is truly objective about it, the new movies aren't much worse (or are nearly as good as) the original trilogy. Except that Star Wars (Episode IV, A New Hope, whatever) completely rearranged my four-year-old mind in a way that no movie since has matched. Of course, the prequels could never have reproduced that magic for me. And in the interim, I grew up and began to expect intelligent dialogue, good acting, and sensible stories. The prequels can't cut it on my current standards. But if I let myself regress, I like the prequels for what they are: good, clean fun.

      But some things about the prequels are inexcusable: the racial stereotyping, the misuse of fine actors (hey, Alec Guiness was better as Obi Wan than Liam Neason was as Qui Gon, but Neason is as fine an actor as Guiness was), and the midichlorians thing.

      And on a larger, cultural level, the prequels fall far short of the original trilogy. Star Wars imitated World War II movies (bad guys with english accents and vaguely nazi-like uniforms, an evil empire intent on tyranny and murder of innocents, stormtroopers, dogfights, impossible odds against the heroes) and thus more easily captured the imaginations of adults at the time as well as children. The whole original trilogy mirrored our cultural experience not only fresh in history but rife with parallels to the Cold War and the Evil Empire. Star Wars also came at a time when, as a nation, we needed to heal ourselves from the divisiveness of the late 60s and early 70s, and one way to heal was by recalling past glories. The prequels aren't rooted in anything, except Flash Gordon serials. Those serials were the direct precursor to TV, and TV culture is focused on immediate, short term consumer exploitation. Those serials don't reflect anything more than materialism. And that's all the prequels reflect as a result.

      So, yeah, on a superficial level, the prequels are no better or worse than the original trilogy, but on a deeper level, the prequels lack a significant connection to our cultural history, which was something that the original trilogy did have. In that sense, the prequels are much worse than the original trilogy.

    4. Re:Why do you all get so worked up about this? by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      whole original trilogy mirrored our cultural experience not only fresh in history but rife with parallels to the Cold War and the Evil Empire

      the prequels lack a significant connection to our cultural history


      Using the WWII metaphor, the Episodes I, II, & III might mirror the slow errosion of democracy into an empire. That seems to be a common consensus about the US

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    5. Re:Why do you all get so worked up about this? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      for these people their was no way that the new movies could live up to the expectations.

      Actually that is a very good third point, trying to replace the faces of the past with new faces. Sir Alec Guinness will always be Obi-Wan to me. Many series suffer once a core actor is replaced and in the case episode 1-3 there was simply no other way. I doubt Mark Hamill will be back either. Star Wars 77 is over. People are not going to embrace someone taking over for a prime time Hans Solo.

      I think it's also why so many fanboys are upset with AVP, which I though was a good movie.

      Not to go too far off topic but I felt it was good too. But, alas, I was rooting for the alien. Without getting into a big discussion about it I will say that as good as it was I was hoping for better but expecting less. But part of the difference is that the alien and the predator are timeless. Unless you're a big Sigorney Weaver fan the alien series doesn't have to age as badly as what Star Wars did because of the fact that the alien isn't an actor, it's a concept.

      The attitude that anything that would in anyway ruin the original must be heresy. Repeat after me: "It is only a movie"

      I can understand why they don't want to have to deal with it but yeah, they need to get over it. Being a big H.P. Lovecraft fan I can relate. I cringe anytime that Lovecraft's name is associated with a film. But I can accept that people are basically here to ruin life for me.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  123. Re:You're fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What some companies seem to do nowdays is have a preliminary NDA.

    Basically, they first make you sign something that says you will not discuss the terms of the 'real' NDA, then they present it to you.

  124. Bad luke - Bad! by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, if there is a sequel - I want the original actors - and I want to see Luke follow the same path as Anakin.

    *THAT* would be worth seeing.

    After all, anyone who paid any attention to what Yoda said in Empire knows that Luke is trending to the dark side. Heck, it is even shown in ROTJ. About the only "light side" thing he does is refuse to strike down Vader. Everything else really seems to go against Yoda's philosopy.

    Having Han and Leia fighting against Luke would be interesting... provided that the other luke... LUCAS stayed out of it.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:Bad luke - Bad! by BakaHoushi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I've read a comic of Star Wars that shows a few things:

      1. The Emperor is not dead. He can come back after death by entering a new host body (He admits it's painful and unleasant, but such is the cost of supposed "immortality."
      2. Luke DOES fall to the Dark Side, but it is quite brief and is pulled back by his JEDI sister. (Yes, Leia becomes a Jedi... as do her kids, I believe)

  125. Call me a cynic but... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    ...the whole Star Wars movie filming saga would be equivalent to JRR Tolkein writing "The Two Towers" first, then (due to popular demand) going off and writing "Fellowship Of The Ring" and then being indecisive about writing "The Return Of The King" to finish the stories off!

    Surely Star Trek serves a classic example of what happens when you end up jumping back and forth to the beginning and end of events in a particular universe - ulitmately, money rules over cohesion of historical events until the whole mythology is totally messed up.

    Episodes 4,5 & 6 are absolute classics and relate the story of a particular thread of events in the Star Wars universe - yes, after finishing "Return Of The Jedi", Lucas might have gone on into a subsequent film or trilogy about post-Darth Vader events - but I think he's already proven, as Rick Berman and Brannon Braga have with "Enterprise", that trying to write a prequel to fit into the existing accepted mythology is virtually impossible.

    Lucas should put Star Wars down now and go off and retire with the money he has.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Call me a cynic but... by Colazar · · Score: 1
      You're basically right, but what's funny is that what you describe is what Tolkien actually *did*. After publishing LotR, he went back and got the prequel ready for publication--that being the Silmarillion. And I believe that he'd even started working on a sequel to LotR, due to public acclaim, before deciding that it just wouldn't work.

      Of course, one big difference is that Tolkien had his prequel finished to a large extent before the Lord of the Rings was ever published, so that it fit seamlessly. Tolkien's attention to detail was amazing, though.

      --
      He decided to just watch the government, and kind of scale it down to size, and run his life that way. --Laurie Anderson
  126. Is the new trilogy really THAT bad..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Honestly - is the new trilogy so bad after all? It is different, true, because of the different time. The original trilogy happens during the Imperial reign, and the Galaxy has actually gone backwards a bit. While the new trilogy has the Republic still somewhat in it's glory days and the Galaxy is culturally much more advanced. I myself somehow enjoy all those magnificent costumes, palaces and all.

    The story isn't that awesome, agreed, but really, is the original either? I feel a big reason for complaining is that the complainers themselves aren't the same people anymore. I imagine many here are between 30 and 40 - still somewhat young when SW came out. The younger have probly saw them quite long ago too. I just think that the feeling you get from a sci-fi movie at the age of 30 is quite different from what you'd get if you were 15, and that may well be a reason many dislike the new movies.

    1. Re:Is the new trilogy really THAT bad..? by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      There's the other side of that coin. Lucas was younger then, too. A 30-something has more in common with younsters, teens and adults (4-30ish)than does a 60-something.

      Now he's aged too much to connect with younsters, teens and young adults (18-28)

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  127. Table scraps... by remin8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...why must we feed off the table scraps of George Lucas?! WHY?!!!!

    I'll tell you! Because we all want a lightsaber and an X-Wing!

    --

    "Initial success, or total failure!"
    remin8.com
  128. hype for ep III by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    This is just a slick way to garner hype for episode 3.

    If they can make money at it... they probably will film it. Just take control away from George. They guy is not the wellspring of originality.

  129. mod parent up! by macshune · · Score: 1

    >They should just give Lucas a money printer and save some time!

    Parent can see things before they happen. He can help you. Mod him up!

  130. Jar-Jar Binks by btsdev · · Score: 1

    But how are they going to get Jar-Jar into the story so long after Episode 3? : /

    1. Re:Jar-Jar Binks by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Someone reads the tea leaves and realizes where the Republc is headed. So, as part of an emergency move freeze certain key senators (Jar-Jar among them), they a discovered and revived.

      Then someone realizes that it was Jar-Jar Binks that recommended that Palpatine be given dictatorial powers (paving the way from senator to emperor) the New Republic puts Jar--JAr on trial for treason or war crimes or somesuch.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  131. Remake Episodes 4, 5 and 6??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been over 25 years since the original Star Wars movie came out. I've had this hunch for awhile now that Lucas may just remake the original three movies, perhaps telling the story through the eyes of Darth Vader. Then, perhaps, he'd continue on with 7, 8 and 9.

    The stated reason is that the technology had improved to the point that it was worth remaking them, as well as presenting them from a new perspective.

    Of course, the real reason is that there's money to be made!

  132. I don't think so by maxpublic · · Score: 1

    The only reason I rented ep 2 on video was to watch the luscious Natalie Portman. Since eps 7, 8, and 9 won't have this little hottie in them strutting her stuff, what exactly is supposed to be the draw?

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    1. Re:I don't think so by Monkey · · Score: 1

      eps 7, 8, and 9 won't have this little hottie in them strutting her stuff

      Say it's not so! The rumor I heard was that we'd finally get to see this actress naked and petrified. If this isn't the case, I don't know what the hell I'm going to do with this bowl of hot grits I've been saving all this time!

  133. What does Jar Jar have to say? by unixsavant · · Score: 3, Funny

    Meesa thought it couldnt get any worse... Meesa was wrong...

  134. A Very Star Wars Christmas by DarthStrydre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Has everyone forgotten the horrid episode IV-and-a-half, also known as 'Star Wars Holiday Special'?
    Episode I was definitely not the first sub-par installment (in our chronology at least).

    I also vaguely remember the two 'Ewok Adventures' I used to watch as a kid, and enjoyed, though at the time I was not yet old enough to be a good critic. When are these three bastard children going to be re-released?

    1. Re:A Very Star Wars Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Has everyone forgotten the horrid episode IV-and-a-half, also known as 'Star Wars Holiday Special'?

      You insensitive clod! I almost had that completely repressed!

    2. Re:A Very Star Wars Christmas by neurojab · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the "Star Wars" holiday special... George Lucas thought he burned all the remaining copies of that, the pile of putrid filth that it is. Apparently gets quite pissed off when you mention it to him.

      I dare you to watch the whole thing in one sitting.

      The Ewok movies weren't THAT bad. They're a notch or two below "episode one", but still can't be fairly compared to the holiday special. In any case, George Lucas hasn't completely disowned those, so I'd bet that we'll at least see them on DVD in a few years.

    3. Re:A Very Star Wars Christmas by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Has everyone forgotten the horrid episode IV-and-a-half, also known as 'Star Wars Holiday Special'? Episode I was definitely not the first sub-par installment (in our chronology at least).

      AAAAAAAAARGH! I had literally forgotten all about it! I vividly remember each and every time I saw Ep IV, V, and VI in the theater, but it took several minutes of perusing this site before the horror came flooding back. I remember being utterly appalled when I watched it, and I was only nine. Thank you SO much for bringing back this horrible repressed memory.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:A Very Star Wars Christmas by dave-tx · · Score: 1
      I remember being utterly appalled when I watched it, and I was only nine.

      Man, I was just thinking the same thing. I was also nine at the time, and remember thinking "this is the dumbest fucking thing I've ever wasted two hours watching", although not quite in those words.

      Seriously though, it does take a massive feat of dumbness to make such an impression on a nine-year-old. Kudos to Lucas for that, I suppose.

      --

      >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

    5. Re:A Very Star Wars Christmas by jlechem · · Score: 1

      Actually it was announced the ewok movies are coming out on DVD. I don't recall the exact source but it seemed legit. The holiday special with the coked out her mind carrie fisher and bea arthur can rest in the special seat in hell it deserves.

      --
      Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
    6. Re:A Very Star Wars Christmas by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Holiday Special is readily available on eBay.

      --
      resigned
    7. Re:A Very Star Wars Christmas by Loligo · · Score: 1

      >Ah yes, the "Star Wars" holiday special...

      >I dare you to watch the whole thing in one sitting.

      I'd say there isn't enough Jack Daniels in the world, but there was that weekend where I woke up with Amy...

      Bring on the singing Bea Arthurs.

      -l

    8. Re:A Very Star Wars Christmas by Loligo · · Score: 1

      Weird, I thought I replied to the parent of this one.

      Ohwell.

      Mybad.

      Whatever.

    9. Re:A Very Star Wars Christmas by Jardine · · Score: 1

      I also vaguely remember the two 'Ewok Adventures' I used to watch as a kid, and enjoyed, though at the time I was not yet old enough to be a good critic.

      I remember a scene in a movie involving a hang glider in a cave and Ewoks in the cave with it. Until I rewatched ROTJ at an age where I could remember exactly what was happening, I would have sworn that scene was in ROTJ. Then I figured it was just from some 80s movie with a creature that looked similar to an Ewok or it could have been a scene that took place in the cartoon. I had no idea the two movies you've mentioned existed.

      Does anyone recall seeing the scene I mentioned in either of the above movies?

    10. Re:A Very Star Wars Christmas by jaraxle · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's from the Ewok movie involving the two children (a whole family? did the mother and father die?) who befriend the Ewoks. I think they were trying to escape a pterodactyl-ish monster in the scene that you're talking about...

      ~jaraxle

  135. Storyline (Warning: Contains Spoilers!) by Devi0s · · Score: 1

    Luke, after receiving the award for his heroism, abruptly looses public adoration and affection when Lea announces her plans of a tour with Britney Spears and Jessica Simpson.

    Luke quickly becomes starved for public attention and acts out in the form of a vicious cocaine addition and public acts of beastiality with Chewy at intergalactic S&M clubs.

    Han Solo conducts an intervention with Luke in which Luke enters rehab and is slowly cured of his addictions... or so they all think. Luke is really just pretending to be cured to get close to Lea.

    He starts a fan club of for the new sensation, The Coshmos. This allows him to get close enough that he eventually is able to take Lea out with a sniper rifle he purchases from Jason Bourne in Bourne Revolutions.

    They are still working on the ending, but I think that G.I. Joe talks about the dangers of Heroin addictions and says something about knowing being half the battle...

    --
    - Have you ever noticed that the more you learn about technology, the more stupid you sound trying to explain it?
  136. I can see it before me... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    In one scene, a character named Greedy, played by George Lucas himself, will shoot a character called Hastwo Scriptoo first...
    The movie will end up among the most watched movies of the year and everyone will hate it.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  137. Aha! by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1

    You've caught on to his moviemaking method!

  138. Well whoopty f*cking wow! by JacquesItch · · Score: 1

    So, Lucas is going to squeeze out three more turds for the fanboys.

    JacquesItch

  139. Its never going to happen by CrimeDoggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is no need to worry over how Lucas will ruin 3 more Star Wars films; it will never happen. First, the NDA stuff is a rumor that has been around for a while, and is just there to protect some IP. Second, Lucas is too old to want to devote another solid 10 years to the single topic of SW films. Third, Lucas has said in public that he wants to do more stuff in TV next. Fourth, there is no story. Its now clear that ROTJ ends the story arc that Lucas wanted to tell. Fifth, and last, is that there is way too much SW Universe crap put there (30+ novels) that fill up from the day after ROTJ to 20+ years beyond. Yes, I know that they are not "canon" unless Lucas writes them, but there is way too much out there and way to much money invested to then have some new movies come out and change it all. Can you imagine the fan backlash if all the stuff the novels created was then just made into "fan-fiction?" Get real.

    1. Re:Its never going to happen by nagora · · Score: 1
      Can you imagine the fan backlash if all the stuff the novels created was then just made into "fan-fiction?" Get real.

      The "fans" that are interested in non-cannon novel cash-ins whether Star Wars or Star Trek number about 400 (total weight: 200000lbs). The fact that they go to conventions and write anal newsletters doesn't change the fact that no one outside of their tiny circle gives a shit what they think. If there's money in it the studio will do it; they only licenced the books to make cash - no one in charge will even have read them. Losing those 400 tickets won't make the difference.

      BTW, I'd rather not have another three movies if they're going to be at the current level of quality.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  140. I have the movies' names by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 1

    Thanks to an anonymous source I'll call "G.L." deep within Skywalker Ranch, let me be the first to reveal to the world the names of Episodes VII, VIII, and IX:

    * Star Wars: Reloaded
    * Star Wars: Revolutions
    * Star Wars: Electric Boogaloo

  141. Wait, was that sarcasm? by Lethyos · · Score: 1
    His work on the last couple movies has been outstanding. I hope he keeps directing them himself. May the force be with him!

    On Slashdot, it's hard to distinguish if you're a bitter, sarcastic viewer and a die-hard, intensely loyal George Lucas fanboy when you talk like that.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Wait, was that sarcasm? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > > His work on the last couple movies has been outstanding. I hope he keeps directing them himself. May the force be with him!
      >
      > On Slashdot, it's hard to distinguish if you're a bitter, sarcastic viewer and a die-hard, intensely loyal George Lucas fanboy when you talk like that.

      ...there's a difference? :)

  142. J.K. Rowling on George Lucas by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Being the HP geek that I am, I immediately thought of JK Rowling's recent rather hilarious comment about George Lucas:

    Q: Will there be a book about Harry's Mum and Dad, about how they became friends and how they died?

    A: So it would be "Harry Potter: Episode One". [Laughter]. No, but a lot of people have asked that. It is all George Lucas's fault. You won't need a prequel; by the time I am finished, you will know enough. I think it would be shamelessly exploitative to do that. I am sure that Mr Lucas is doing it only for artistic reasons, but in my case I think that by the time you have had the seven books you will know everything you need to know for the story.

    "Artist reasons" -- LOL. I love JKR.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:J.K. Rowling on George Lucas by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1
      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:J.K. Rowling on George Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Being the HP geek that I am, I immediately thought of JK Rowling's recent rather hilarious comment about George Lucas...Artist reasons" -- LOL. I love JKR"

      As if she's all high and mightier than Lucas. Its been out in the public since the late 70s that Lucas envisioned the Star Wars saga to consist of AT LEAST 9 films. He had first said 12, and then scaled it back to 9. At the beginning of the Prequels, he pared that down to 6 because he didn't think he had it in him to do 6 more Star Wars movies. So the whole idea of extra Star Wars movies in addition to the original 3 is not something new so JKR has nothing to scoff at. Lord knows that she wouldn't even have this successful series without Star Wars being out before it.

      The Lynxpro

    3. Re:J.K. Rowling on George Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, J.K. Rowling can't write for toffee. Go read some Alan Garner and see where she stole all her ideas from.

    4. Re:J.K. Rowling on George Lucas by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1
      As if she's all high and mightier than Lucas. Its been out in the public since the late 70s that Lucas envisioned the Star Wars saga to consist of AT LEAST 9 films. He had first said 12, and then scaled it back to 9. At the beginning of the Prequels, he pared that down to 6 because he didn't think he had it in him to do 6 more Star Wars movies. So the whole idea of extra Star Wars movies in addition to the original 3 is not something new so JKR has nothing to scoff at.

      Oh, please. I was there, you were clearly not. George Lucas did NOT conceive of Star Wars as more than one film. And he NEVER has mentioned 12 (WTF?). After Star Wars came out, he announced that he was going to do nine movies and renamed the original to "episode 4". Later on, he decided not to do the sequels, but just the prequels.

      Lord knows that she wouldn't even have this successful series without Star Wars being out before it.

      Now you have truly gone off the deep end into insanity. Are you seriously suggesting that George Lucas invented fantasy??

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:J.K. Rowling on George Lucas by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I am sure that Mr Lucas is doing it only for artistic reasons

      Damn, that's the coldest back-handed complement I've heard in a while. Nice.

      And here I thought she was just a sell-out who liked to sue little fangirls.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  143. No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you mother wants her broomstick back when you are done playing with it.

  144. *yawn*,,, I knew it all along by ejamie · · Score: 1

    This makes perfect sense to me. Over the last few years, Lucas hasn't wanted to take the focus off the current franchise (eps 1,2,3), by setting expectations about an additional three movies. Now that the current franchise is running out (episode III releases May 2005), it is time to think about the future roadmap ($) of the star wars franchise. From a marketing perspective, I'm sure it is better to treat the whole series as three separate franchises, instead of a huge nine-movie sequence. (Was it just me who was bored of Star Trek because there seemed there would be no end in sight for their movies?) I've always thought once Episode 3 releases, there will be a big collective, "now what?" from the audience. Isn't episode 3 going to be a pretty big downer? ("Vader kills everyone, now go re-watch episodes 4,5,6") Next year would be perfect time to announce the final trilogy. :-) . . . That said, I hope Lucas does film the final three episodes. I'd like to see it set in Luke Skywalker's later years (50 yrs old+). The awesome part about this would be that Lucas could use some of the same actors for the final trilogy!!! (introducing newer younger characters too of course). In short, provide an entire movie timeline into the history of, rise to fame, and final glory of Luke Skywalker. Now *that* would be cool. *wipes tear from eye*

    --
    Hey! Stop copying my sig!!! Stop copying my sig!!! Stop copying my sig!!! Stop copying my sig!!!
  145. Episodes 7-9 and the wisdom of youth by AnonymousKev · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Way back in 1978, when my best friend and I were young Star Wars geeks, we read an issue of Starlog that mentioned Lucas wanted to do "a trilogy of trilogies". We thought Episodes 1-3 would be so cool: civil war, the origin of Darth Vadar, what's not to like? (Mind you, this was even before RotJ came out.)

    I still remember him saying.

    "But what are they going to do with Episodes 7-9? It's like,
    'And they rebuilt the Republic -- The End.'"

    Forgetting for a moment that Lucas just doesn't have the ability to direct these movies anymore. I try to think what could be done with 7-9 and I keep coming back to my friend's quote.

    --
    Anonymous Kev
    Proudly posting as AC since 1997
    (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
    1. Re:Episodes 7-9 and the wisdom of youth by n8_f · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It sounds like you should read the Timothy Zahn books. I only read a few Star Wars books, but these were far and away the best. I really hoped they would be 7-9, but they are set 5 years or so after RotJ, so by now you would have to get other actors. I suppose it could work (I really wouldn't mind with Luke), but I really wanted to see Harrison Ford as Han Solo again.

      To answer your question directly, however, you just need a bit more context. The Empire suffered a great defeat at the end of RotJ, but they still have a lot of resources. Think of after the fall of the Soviet Union. Ukraine and a bunch of other countries became independent, but Russia still has the bulk of the power.

      Or even better yet, look at Nazi Germany after WWII. There are all kinds of books and films about plots by Nazis trying to resurrect the Third Reich. That is basically what these books are about. An extremely intelligent and cunning general, who was basically held back by the Empire bureaucracy, still has an Imperial Star Destroyer, a small fleet, and a plan to push the Republic back off the top of the hill. I can't remember them very well now, but I remember liking them as much as the original movies. Trust me, you are much better reading these than seeing 1-3. I think Timothy Zahn should write books for 1-3 and we can just ignore those movies.

  146. The Search for More Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I heard that Lucas decided to steal the title for the yet-to-be-made sequel to Spaceballs

  147. Starwars? What about Spaceballs! :( by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd rather see a sequel to Mel Brook's Spaceballs.

    Anyway, Yogurt promised! "Spaceballs II: The search for more money!"

    After all, who can dismiss a wonderful parody like this:
    Lord Helmet: I'm your father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roomate.
    Lone Starr: And what does that make us?
    Lord Helmet: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

    1. Re:Starwars? What about Spaceballs! :( by ScottForbes · · Score: 1

      I thought it was Spaceballs III: The Search for Spaceballs II.

  148. *yawn*,,, I knew it all along... by ejamie · · Score: 1

    This makes perfect sense to me.

    Over the last few years, Lucas hasn't wanted to take the focus off the current franchise (eps 1,2,3), by setting expectations about an additional three movies.

    Now that the current franchise is running out (episode III releases May 2005), it is time to think about the future roadmap ($) of the star wars franchise.

    From a marketing perspective, I'm sure it is better to treat the whole series as three separate franchises, instead of a huge nine-movie sequence. (Was it just me who was bored of Star Trek because there seemed there would be no end in sight for their movies?)

    I've always thought once Episode 3 releases, there will be a big collective, "now what?" from the audience. Isn't episode 3 going to be a pretty big downer? ("Vader kills everyone, now go re-watch episodes 4,5,6")

    Next year would be perfect time to announce the final trilogy. :-)

    . . .

    That said, I hope Lucas does film the final three episodes.

    I'd like to see it set in Luke Skywalker's later years (50 yrs old+). The awesome part about this would be that Lucas could use some of the same actors for the final trilogy!!! (introducing newer younger characters too of course).

    In short, provide an entire movie timeline into the history of, rise to fame, and final glory of Luke Skywalker. Now *that* would be cool.

    *wipes tear from eye*

    --
    Hey! Stop copying my sig!!! Stop copying my sig!!! Stop copying my sig!!! Stop copying my sig!!!
  149. DS9 by Thrymm · · Score: 1

    I know quite a few people couldnt stand this series. I actually felt it had a very good plot line with the Cardassians and the Dominion however. Sure it was based around a space station in the middle of nowhere, but they did many shows which were not aboard it. Rick Berman did an awesome job with it.

    1. Re:DS9 by White+Roses · · Score: 1
      I found it to be a little hit or miss. And not engaging enough for me to program my VCR (at the time) to record it, as I did with TNG. I watched it when it was handy, and I kept track of when it was on. Voyager, I didn't keep track of, and Enterprise I am just short of keeping track of so I can avoid it entirely.

      Not a reflection on the acting pools for any of these shows, as I think they've always done a good casting job, but the story lines have become re-hash after re-hash. Just have T'Pol jump the shark already.

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
  150. Post-RotJ is like a bad traffic accident by Yonder+Way · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You don't want to look, but you have to.

    Seriously, George, if you're reading this, share some control with some of your trusted friends. Episodes I & II were so terribly bad. If you do VII-IX, please for the love of Yoda get your good buddy Steven Spielberg on the project and let him deal with the actors.

  151. Re:Philip Kaufman by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1
    Kaufman's contribution (before he died)

    I don't think you have the right Kaufman. this guy is still very much alive, and released an Ashley Judd movie (messy) just this year.

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  152. I already know the title for Episode VII by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 4, Funny

    The movie will be called Star Wars: Episode VII: The Blatant Grab For Cash

    --
    Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
    1. Re:I already know the title for Episode VII by Gleng · · Score: 1

      Ah, so it's a story of economic difficulties in the fledgling New Republic?

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    2. Re:I already know the title for Episode VII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, "Episode VII: Theatre Full of Virgins."

  153. So in the sequels is... by GreenCrackBaby · · Score: 1

    Is Greedo still alive, and shown having a beer with Han while they share a joke about that trick Han played on the Cantina owner so many years ago?

    --

    "The market alone cannot provide sufficient constraints on corporation's penchant to cause harm." -- Joel Bakan
  154. Lucas's great moral... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Cripples are evil.

  155. Mark Hamill by jeepee · · Score: 1

    Mark Hamill must be crossing his fingers now....

    Is he dead?

    1. Re:Mark Hamill by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

      Actually he doesn't need Star Wars he has actually had a very successful post stars career. Look at all the Voice work he has done. He had a huge run as the Joker in the Batman animated series. He is hurting in no way at all, for work...and with Star Wars Residuals...ha his Great Great grand children are set for life.

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    2. Re:Mark Hamill by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      Try watching Cartoon Network one of these days. You'll find some people seem to be in EVERY show in some way shape or form on that network. Mark Hammil is one of them (He even appeared as a CG character in an episode of Johnny Bravo because, as a director said, "kids love those computer effects these days."). Another is something like Phil Lammar or something like that, who plays Samurai Jack, Hermes of Futurama, and about 9 billion other roles.

      Good ol' Mark doesn't exactly need work. He's set for a good long time.

  156. So would this make Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the longest non-adult movie series ever, or has star trek topped it? I mean, even police academy doesn't have 9 movies.

    1. Re:So would this make Star Wars by ckelly5 · · Score: 1

      star trek actually has 10 movies currently (Nemesis was also known as Star Trek X.

      and Police Academy 8 comes out in 2006

    2. Re:So would this make Star Wars by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

      I think I read that Bond was the longest, followed by Star Trek.

  157. Use the Force, Luke! by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    loads blaster...presses firmly to temple

    Storm Trooper1: What have we got here then?
    Storm Trooper2: It appears to be a case of suicide.
    Storm Trooper1: His head's crushed in, surely he couldn't use the Force against himself like that!
    Storm Trooper2: No, he made a positive comment regarding the first 2 episodes and was pummeled by a mob wearing 'Die Jar Jar' shirts.
    Storm Trooper1: Yep, suicide alright

    Honestly, I think George Lucas was watching Spaceballs and got to the part where Yogurt says the secret is 'Moichandising!' and saw they light.

    "May da schwarz be wit you!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  158. The key difference between SW and ST as I see it.. by Toxygen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is that with Star Trek, it's no longer being guided by the man with the original vision, it's a couple of Roddenberry's lackeys and you can plainly see that they don't fully understand what he wanted Star Trek to be. (Although I will say that despite being in the obvious minority here, I really do enjoy Enterprise)

    Star Wars however, only has Lucas to blame. It's as if it works better without a beginning or an end, like we'd rather look out the window into the story instead of walking down the street to see what's on the next block. It's like he's trying to come up with more story instead of letting it flow naturally, almost like his own creation doesn't make sense to him, and that is why I think the new ones don't appeal to us like the old ones did.

  159. Re:Philip Kaufman by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    well just replace write with bought.

    you know, like how tv execs buy shows from europe and bill them as theirs.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  160. Oh no... by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

    Plan 9 from outer space! :-)

  161. Is that him at the bank? by zipwow · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article has a picture of him laughing, but doesn't say whether it was actually taken at the bank? Can anyone confirm?

    -Zipwow

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
    1. Re:Is that him at the bank? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, it was on the way to the bank.

  162. episode titles by prockcore · · Score: 1

    I propose the following titles:

    A New Hope for Income
    The Finance Department Strikes Back
    Return of the Money Grubber

  163. All is not lost by Louis+Savain · · Score: 1

    One of the great things that Star Wars has over Star Trek is that Lucas uses a lot of robots in his films whereas smart robots are almost non-existent (except for Data and Nomad). Enterprise should have been filled with all sorts of robots.

    I think it is about time that somebody does a major sci-fi movie from the robot's point of view. Also I would like to see a lot more attention spent on the villain. The nice thing about the old Star Wars was that Darth Vader was much more prominent in the screeplay. He was really cool.

    1. Re:All is not lost by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1
      I think it is about time that somebody does a major sci-fi movie from the robot's point of view.

      You mean like Millenium Man? Or, according to some interpretations, Blade Runner?

    2. Re:All is not lost by Louis+Savain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Millenium Man was a disaster, a stupid and annoying movie, IMO. I did not like A.I. either. Now Blade Runner was cool, especially the robot played by Rutger Hauer. However, I am not really interested in human-looking robots per se. I am more interested in their philosophy and motivation. In I, Robot, for example, we saw a little bit of the machines's (Viki) mind and rationale. Same thing in Blade Runner.

      It would be cool to have a robot who did not know he was one, go on a hate-filled rampage against other robots, only to find out later that he/she is a robot as well. Can a machine have remorse? Would it self-destruct like Star Trek's Nomad?

    3. Re:All is not lost by lidocaineus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, Blade Runner touched on that very subject in a very impressive fashion; just because it didn't spell it out for you doesn't mean you couldn't interpret it in that exact way.

  164. Comicbook Guy... by midifarm · · Score: 1
    I can't do that to myself. Yes, there are things that I thought could've improved with the two prequels, but I also go into these movies with the same eyes of the child that went to the first trilogy in the theater. I don't go looking for faults. I don't go looking for nitpicking details of a Trekker. I just want to enjoy myself and I have, so far. It's that fact that so many people have become jaded and have transmuted into the Comicbook guy.

    Peace

  165. Why???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone told Lucas that movies don't HAVE to come in 3???

  166. Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic that a... uh... wait.

  167. Jedi knight.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Maybe they will follow Kyle from Jedi knight... could be really cool to see someone fist fighting a huge monster :D

    But then isn't the star wars universe already fully mapped in books and various spin off things?

    --
    I like muppets.
  168. Whatever he makes... by Mignon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Recent experience suggests that it will be a piece of sith.

    1. Re:Whatever he makes... by mihalis · · Score: 1

      These aren't the sequels you're after

      You don't need to see his scripts

      I find your lack of directorial skills ... disturbing.

      This thread is as if millions of voices cried out in terror, and then just kept on...

  169. AT-ATs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think Lucas stole the AT-ATs from Tolkein.

    I heard a different story; I don't know if it is true.

    I was riding on a BART train in the San Francisco area, and we were going past a port area, where cargo ships get loaded and unloaded. There are large container cranes there, that lift container boxes on and off ships. The cranes look very much like AT-ATs; they are even a light grey color (or dirty white, something like that). The person standing next to me said "George Lucas got the idea for the AT-ATs from those." He could have been an employee of Lucasfilm, whose headquarters is north of San Francisco. (He could also have been some random guy who didn't really know anything.)

    That's assuming that Lucas invented the AT-ATs at all, too. He could have told his prop guys "make some kind of really cool tanks to attack the Rebels" and they came up with the AT-ATs. I doubt we will ever know.

    Factor in budget and expectations, Clones literally tops the list as worst movie ever made.

    Oh, behave. Phantom Menace was a far worse movie, and neither of them deserves a place in the Bottom 100 list. Are you saying AotC was a worse movie than Manos the Hands of Fate? Or are you just saying AotC was the worst Star Wars movie?

  170. Never gonna happen.... by phamNewan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...because he has always taken the profit from the last to finance the next one. Episode III will be almost a break even at best. Figure a production cost of $150 million, and that is about what its domestic gross will be give or take $25 million.

    He has trashed the franchise so badly be making drawn out, boring movies that even Jar-Jar wouldn't watch the next one.

    Call me a troll, but I really liked 4-6, but I did not enjoy 1, and I detested 2. It is not because I am older either. My 7 year old would rather watch IV than any other one.

    Perhaps the saddest thing of all is that Genndy Tartakovsky made the 25 minute long animated Clone Wars and it was better and more gripping in every way. Episode 19 was the best two minutes of Star Wars ever made. Lucus just doesn't have it anymore. Simple as that.

  171. Wow, something to look forward to... by nologin · · Score: 1
    The end of the saga, Star Wars Episode IX: Jar Jar Binks Owns All Your Base, sometime in May 2014...

    You never know what they can do with that carbonite freezer...

    There is one thing stronger than "The Force". It's called a copyright... Because it lives on after you die.

  172. Who cares? by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And why is it an international "law" that IT geeks have to be into Sci-fi?

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    --
    Scott

    ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  173. Imagine a... by bayerwerke · · Score: 1



    (something important seems to be missing from your comment ... like the body or the subject!)

  174. In other news.... by Shagz · · Score: 1

    ...thousands of religious fanatics "head to the hills" screaming such things as "The End(tm) is near" and "The Evil One walks among us!" Theologians mention that "this latest Lucas development really has us worried."

  175. How to Watch PM and AotC by Fade_to_Blah · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not necessarily in this order: 1. Buy extra large coke. 2. Buy pint of Jack Daniels 3. Mix ingredients. 4. Drink half during previews. The movie turns out halfway descent, and you pass out just in time to miss the "love story" of AotC.

  176. The Opening Sequence by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    with the two abandoned samurai in HF is directly ripped off by the sequence where R2D2 and C3P0 are walking away from the escape pod. Yep. There is no denying it.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  177. Three that don't stand the test of time? by Bonewalker · · Score: 1
    So far, we've got three movies which don't stand the test of time (the orignal three)

    Dude, what are you talking about? By what standard are you measuring them?

    Let's see, they changed the way we think about sequels, they were all in the top 10 grossing movies of all time at the time they came out, they were re-released 20 years after there intitial release and made millions, they set the standard for special effects in movies...

    I just can't see what yardstick you are using to measure the 'test of time', but you seriously ought to reconsider this statement. These movies will be around for several more decades before their shine begins to fade. That is standing the test of time, if you ask me.

    1. Re:Three that don't stand the test of time? by scowling · · Score: 1

      By what standard? By my standard. I find them embarassingly dated.

      Popularity is no gauge of quality. That's the argumentum ad numerum fallacy.

      For me, their shine faded in the mid-80s.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    2. Re:Three that don't stand the test of time? by Bonewalker · · Score: 1
      Ah, but not everything I mentioned was based on the popularity of the movies, now was it?

      The list of technical ground-breaking work they did while working on the original trilogy is very long. The directing and writing of ESB was particularly good, and it also went against the grain and ended on a less than upbeat note. Do these things count for nothing?

      Sounds to me like you are just hyper-critical. Sure, the new movies are a serious let-down, but there is no need to knock the first three based on the last two's failures.

    3. Re:Three that don't stand the test of time? by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      That may be your opinion. I personally still think that the first 3 are great movies, although the 2 prequels kind of put me off of Star Wars entirely.

      I don't think the old movies look dated, either. In fact, I find them refreshingly free of not-quite-right CGI effects.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    4. Re:Three that don't stand the test of time? by scowling · · Score: 1

      And now, two cases argumentum ad hominem; the criticism must be unsound because I am a critical person, and my criticism of the first three movies is suspect because of my crtiicism of the most recent two.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    5. Re:Three that don't stand the test of time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While popularity is not a guage of quality, a movie that remains popular for a long period in time has by definition, stood the test of time.

      I don't think the fallacy applies in this case.

    6. Re:Three that don't stand the test of time? by scowling · · Score: 1

      Nope. I don't see it that way; that is, I don't accept your definition of that aphorism.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    7. Re:Three that don't stand the test of time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just shut the fuck up. Wow, you're all contrary to what most people think. Give some real reasoning as to why you feel they do not stand the test of time.

      And at the moment you are just saying they don't stand the test of you.

    8. Re:Three that don't stand the test of time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Popularity is no gauge of quality"

      Neither is your opinion.

  178. my take on it anonymously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im happy

    i want more special fx extravaganzas to make fun of.

  179. Comics or Book? by Hiro2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it would be really cool if he did the story with Thrawn or some stuff from the X-Wing Saga. The Thrawn saga was amazing because Timothy Zahn did a great job with the story.

    But I would also love to see the return of the emporer and luke turning to the dark side. I loved the comic. But I don't think you could make 3 movies out of it :(

  180. AT-ATs -- Port of Oakland cranes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You can judge for yourselves.

    They DO look amazingly similar to AT-ATs.

    1. Re:AT-ATs -- Port of Oakland cranes by Blic · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Except that that picture is of *new* cranes arriving from China, which was in 2000 or 2002, which makes it about 20 years too late. That doesn't mean older cranes couldn't have influenced Lucas - the Port of Oakland is (AFAIK) the largest on the West Coast and has been handling those giant container ships since the 60s, so there were no doubt cranes of some kind.

      Maybe some of these are older?

      More pics of cranes

  181. What? You never heard of remakes??? by dacap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know the movie biz - if there's a buck to be made, they'll find a way to make it - making a remake of a bad movie is a tried and true formula for it. And I ask you - how many remakes turn out as good or better than the original?

    --
    English -- gotta love it! / The engineers refuse to refuse the rocket until the refuse is removed from the launch pad.
    1. Re:What? You never heard of remakes??? by Matthew+Schultheis · · Score: 1

      The Ocean's 11 remake was perhaps better than the original.

  182. The Aftermath by BakaHoushi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, just because the Empire fell doesn't mean things were all happy and cheery in the New Republic. The Empire fell, true, but it was not out. The Remnant Forces (as they came to be known) became quite prevalent and the Sith did begin to return, as did the Jedi. Thus, I see a sequel as a likely possibility.

    However, on the other hand, I don't see Lucas directing as the best of ideas. I WOULd like to see Lucas make the OUTLINE for the series. I'd like to see him shape the overall plot. But for the tiny details, for the dialogue, and for other such things... I'd much see... well, a lot of other people doing that.

    And may the Force be with us. Please.

  183. Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money by chiph · · Score: 1

    Dude, I think you're onto something there...

    Mel will have to find a replacement for John Candy. That'll be tough.

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mel will have to find a replacement for John Candy. That'll be tough.

      Will Sasso?

    2. Re:Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money by CrashPoint · · Score: 1

      First one to suggest Jack Black gets a good sharp kick in the throat.

    3. Re:Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad John Candy wasn't a doped up nut like Chris Farley, because I'd nominate Rush Limbaugh.

      Hey-oooooooo!!! I just flew in from Tatooine and boy are my arms tired. Drum roll. Just kidding folks.

    4. Re:Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Mel will have to find a replacement for John Candy. That'll be tough.

      Most actors today aren't half the man he was...

      Chris Mattern

  184. Better than that! by Duhavid · · Score: 1

    All the roles played by Peter Sellers. Now dont bother me with the fact that he is dead, just get it done!

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  185. Why is this news? by McNihil · · Score: 0

    It was clear already from the begining of this "saga" that 4,5,6 would be done first because they were technicaly the easist to do (visually.) 1,2,3 was next and when finaly technology made it possible 7,8,9 would be done.

    Whether them being good story or not doesn't really matter. These movies are done for "kidds."

  186. $urpri$e, $urpri$e, $urpri$e by anonthor · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna have a heart attack and die, I am so $urpri$ed! Hmmm...Movies still making lots of money for minimal brain work. I think I keep making more sequels. Just hope the screenplay doesn't screw up the Timothy Zahn novels that are the true 7th, 8th, and 9th episodes.

  187. More objective rankings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ANH: Ass
    ESB: Ass
    ROTJ: Ass
    TPM: Ass
    AOTC: Ass

    There's not a single movie in the entire series that compares favorably even to Jean-Luc Godard's juvenilia.

    I'm sorry, but the entire Star Wars franchise is just one more gruesomely tasteless example of American bad taste and imperialist/hegemonist dementia. Stormtroopers? Clones? Yes, indeed. Star Wars is a self-portrait of Nazi Germany, drawn by America.

    1. Re:More objective rankings by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      Lighten up, Francis.

  188. Chewie possibly making a return too? by Jugalator · · Score: 1
    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  189. Would love to see some Zahn stuff by adzoox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would love to see some of the books turned into movies. I've only listened to a few of them on audio CD, but I think they are better. It just took Lucas to lay the general universe down.

    I would love to see the rise of the republic back to glory but now they have to fight a new threat - rogue terrorists who benefitted from the Empire's 30 year dominance.

    More bounty hunter action.

    I would also like to see more technical history added in. Like; how to construct a lightsaber, what crystal is used to power it, is it a telescoping antenna?

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  190. As many as 12 at one point. by CryptoEngineer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The notion of 9 films (3 trilogies) has been around since before The Empire Strikes Back was released. At one point, an article in Analog stated that there were plans for 12 films, but I've never seen this claim repeated.

    At the very first screening I went to, the 'Episode 4' title was missing. This was added as soon as it was obvious Lucas had a hit on his hands.

    1. Re:As many as 12 at one point. by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Episode IV subtitle wasn't part of the orginal release, it was added years later.

    2. Re:As many as 12 at one point. by Xcruciate · · Score: 1

      I have always thought that the story was a trilogy of trilogies. I have heard of this since the ANH came out in 1977. Can't remember where I read this, but I was always sure that the story was broken up into three trilogies with "Star Wars" starting the second trilogy.

      --
      It's like "looking busy" at your employment - it's actually easier to do real work than to fake it. - bmo
    3. Re:As many as 12 at one point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that is incorrect. The Episode IV subtitle was added either shortly before, or as part of the films re-release which occured within one year of the films original opening in May of 1977.

    4. Re:As many as 12 at one point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too remember reading references (not in Analog magazine though) about 12 films. I thought I read it in one of the very early "Poster Monthly"'s.

      Ah, the very first screenings. . .

      Where Luke has to throw the grappling hook TWICE, because it missed on the first throw. THEN the door starts to open at the bottom with the stormtroopers peeking underneath, THEN Leia yells "They're coming through!!!", Luke throws for the SECOND time, and it catches.

      Talk about an audience on the edge of their seat! We thought the movie was over, the tension was high. Why Lucas pulled that out, I'll never know, but I certainly wish he'd have put it back in.

      I'll trade Greedo shooting first, for Luke missing with the grappling hook, anyday!

    5. Re:As many as 12 at one point. by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      In some theaters Star Wars played more than 52 weeks. You can't re-release a film that is still in distribution. The renaming first appeared when Star Wars was re-released between V and VI.

  191. I thought the Zahn books were merely OK by Troy+Baer · · Score: 1
    Maybe I'm the only person who feel this way, but I always thought Zahn's Star Wwars books read like he was playing the old West End Star Wars RPG and writing down what happened. The idea of a lifeform that suppresses Force abilities doesn't quite compute for me either. (OTOH, don't get me started on the "mitichlorians" horse-hockey from TPM...)

    The Truce at Bakura was probably my favorite of the post-RotJ books, although the Dark Horse comic miniseries Dark Empire was a lot of fun too.

    --Troy

    --
    "My life's work has been to prompt others... and be forgotten." --Cyrano de Bergerac
  192. Don't Think so by sbowles · · Score: 1
    Half of the problem with Episodes 1-3 was that we all knew how they were going to end.

    If Lucas does plan on doing Episodes 7-9, IMHO he should set them in a time beyond that which has been covered by the post Episode 6 novels. This would remove the constraints of pedantic FanBoys and their novels ("Thrawn's skin is not the right hue of blue!") and would allow for an opportunity to truly create something.

    That said ... if Lucas is too involved, he still might blow it ;^)

    --
    You sly dog: you got me monologuing! - Syndrome
  193. I know a few people who are VERY interested! by Bronz · · Score: 1


    http://imdb.com/name/nm0000434
    http://imdb.com/ name/nm0000402
    http://imdb.com/name/nm0300879

  194. MOD PARENT DOWN by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    So far, we've got three movies which don't stand the test of time (the orignal three)

    That would be why we're still talking about them 27 years later?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by scowling · · Score: 1

      We still talk about the Apple II, as well. What's your point?

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you should mention the Apple II. The Mac was not partiularly successful when it first came out. The only reason that Apple was able to continue on and eventually produce things like the iPod is that Apple II sales kept them afloat. Without it you'd probably hear as much about Apple these days as you would The Digital Group. So don't knock the Apple II.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by scowling · · Score: 1

      I wasn't knocking the Apple II. I was giving a counter-example to your analogy. Simply because we continue to talk about something is no indication that it has withstood the test of time.

      Jeez. I think the original SW movies are overrated. This isn't flamebait. It's just an opinion.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    4. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Define the "test of time" and demonstrate how the movie "Star Wars" has failed to pass it.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  195. Actually by samael · · Score: 1

    According to the IMDB it's:

    ANH: 8.8
    ESB: 8.7
    ROTJ: 8.1
    AOTK: 7.1
    TPM: 6.5

    1. Re:Actually by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Problem is, IMDB skews high on most movies - since the only folks who take the time to rate them are the ones who actually like them. The only real difference between this and the ratings I posted is that ESB is rated higher even than the first Star Wars in the reviews I've seen. Note that my own opinion is actually closer to the IMDB ratings - but then I'm a sappy fan trying to recover my lost youth. I'd go with 8/9/7/6/7 (4/5/6/1/2).

  196. Re:Philip Kaufman by SamSeaborn · · Score: 1
    > Kaufman's contribution (before he died)

    I don't think you have the right Kaufman. this guy is still very much alive, and released an Ashley Judd movie (messy) just this year.

    Weird -- I distinctly remember reading about the guy would wrote the opening and closing scenes of Raiders, died, and his widow faught and won a co-something credit. Could've sworn that was Kaufman. I wonder what I'm thinking of ...

    SLL

  197. Hand It Over by Exos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since Lucas continues to deny that he's going to do all 9 films that he originally envisioned, one can only hope that there might be a slim chance that he would giveup his throne and let another filmmaker finish off the last three.

    Spielberg, Jackson, or Fincher would be nice.

    Hopefully Lucas will get a clue and redeem himself with The Revenge of the Sith, although apparently he's already back in the cutting room after screening it to a bunch of "close" friends.

    It's really tragic, because he pushes ILM incredibly hard and uses them as a source of inspiration to refine and make changes to things he hasn't decided on. In the end, a bunch of work from ILM goes either goes unnoticed, or gets exposed in the confines of a short-sighted story element, reducing the effectiveness of the visuals.

    I just hope the whole "surfing on a bed of lava" ending turns out better than it sounds.

    Oops.

    Maybe Indy 4 will be good enough to remove the predictably bad taste leftover from EP3.

    1. Re:Hand It Over by Down8 · · Score: 1

      Spielberg would fuck it up just as bad - he's in league with the ppl who remake their old movies to be PC and thus crappy. Can't wait to see Indy jones using reverse psychology in place of a whip.

      -bZj

      --
      .sig
  198. Re:You're fired! by StDave · · Score: 1

    splice in shots at random times showing Jar Jar being horribly tortured.

    produced by Lucas, directed by Mel Gibson...

    The Passion of Jar-Jar.

    "Whysa yousa forsake me-sa?"

  199. Due credit by Morkano · · Score: 1
    While I can't find the original post for proper attribution, the following was suggested as a title for Episode III, but might be even more appropriate to 7, 8, and 9 as a whole:

    Dead Horse, Meet Mr. Stick

    I believe this came from the article wherein Episode III's title was released, but who knows...
    That would be from "identity0", in the Better Titles for Star Wars Episode 3? poll.
    --
    Victory or awesome!
  200. Link to Spielberg story by mariox19 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "I've asked him. He won't let me do one." These are the sad words of Steven Spielberg regarding his requests to direct Star Wars being turned down. For years, the director has begged George Lucas for a shot.

    "I wanted to do one 15 years ago, and he didn'twant me to do it. I understand why - Star Wars is George's baby." He mentioned he's still very interested in helming a story that takes place in a galaxy, far, far away.

    The above quote can be found here. It can also be found at this page hosted by the BBC.

    There is also another quote by Spielberg on Lucas which I remember but cannot locate. Spielberg said something about Lucas's editing skills to the effect of: "I would allow George carte blanche to edit any one of my movies." It's a compliment to his editing skills, but sort of a left handed compliment when you think what that might imply about the rest of Lucas's movie making skills.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  201. Here we go again. by jetkust · · Score: 1

    Uh, isn't a copy supposed to actually resemble the origional?

  202. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how a post titled Interesting can be rated funny!

  203. moo-lah by ncurses · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Make three cool movies
    2. wait a long time
    3. make six shitty movies
    4. profit!

    --
    Help! I'm being repressed!
    1. Re:moo-lah by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      5. Rework the three cool movies making them less cool
      6. Release at Cinema
      7. profit!
      8. Release on VHS
      9. profit!
      10. Rework them some more making them junk
      11. Hype up release on DVD
      12. Release on DVD and sucker people into buying them
      13. profit!

  204. Actually, you can buy the Ewok movies from Amazon by SageMadHatter · · Score: 1

    The Ewok Adventure and Ewoks: The Battle for Endor Personally, I still have the recordings from when they use to be played in the Disney channel. I love to watch those movies as a kid. I'm scared to find out what I may think of them today, were I was to watch them again :)

  205. Re:Philip Kaufman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weird -- I distinctly remember reading about the guy would wrote the opening and closing scenes of Raiders, died, and his widow faught and won a co-something credit.

    The secret to this is that it is possible to read about something and for it to still not be true. Takes some people a lot of getting used to, hence the constantly regurgitated crap on message boards.

  206. Re:Great! Warning spoiler by justsomebody · · Score: 1

    What do you mean they fucked up the story line?

    Here's one
    3pi0 and r2d2 don't know who Darth Vader is at begging of Ep. 4. I guess there was some tin-can brainwashing aka. "attack of the sunday commercial tin can opener" involved here.

    and more such mistakes you can find if you read /. articles about SW

    What got fucked up is just the fact that Ep 1 sucked

    And Ep. 2 was no better

    I hope he dies at the hands of Darth Sidious or even better Lord Vader, in Ep 3

    I think that I remember about Jar Jar being present in newly remaked 4,5,6. Which makes Lucas a real artist with moto "Take a good movie, make it over-FX-ed and stupid, repeat job with result except that 'Take a good movie' doesn't apply anymore because that movie already sucks"

    --
    Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
  207. I was hoping i could... by falken0905 · · Score: 0

    I'm an OLD geek who saw the original trilogy in the theaters when they were released. Yes, back when there was only one screen and they had ushers in cute little uniforms. And popcorn popped right at the theater. I was hoping that sometime after next May i could die in peace knowing the saga was *finally* over .

  208. Episode VII "Opening Starfield Text" by Sabu+mark · · Score: 5, Funny

    EPISODE VII
    A CURIOUS MALADY

    Soon after the dubiously abrupt collapse of the Empire, the Galaxy finds itself confronting a new threat. Emboldened by their decisive victory at the Battle of Endor, militant EWOKS are wreaking terror on several helpless star systems, whose colossal battleships and armored troops are of no more avail against the Ewoks' invincible logs and pointy sticks than the Empire's Walkers and Stormtroopers proved to be.

    To resist the Ewok juggernaut, General HAN SOLO has volunteered to lead the armies of the Foboombah system, but his leadership has not proven valuable, since the Ewoks don't use blasters and he inexplicably refuses to fire the first shot. Nor can LUKE SKYWALKER be of assistance. Not only is he forbidden to instruct a new generation of Jedi, on account of his master's deathbed edict that "the last of the Jedi will [he] be," but he is also battling depression and hallucinations of ghosts who tell him profound-sounding things that usually turn out to be total bull a few years later.

    Meanwhile, Princess LEIA SKYWALKER-SOLO-CALRISSIAN is leading a diplomatic mission to Naboo, to ask for assistance from the only race with a military track record that matches that of the undefeated Ewoks; only the GUNGAN arsenal of slingshots and superballs is sufficiently primitive to stand a chance against the Ewoks' own weaponry. And Captain WEDGE ANTILLES prepares to attack the Ewoks on the Forest Moon itself, accompanied by two Jawas and a malfunctioning R2 unit, on the principle that the victory always, without fail, goes to the smallest party involved....

    --

    What Would Jesus Do
    (for a Klondike bar)?
    1. Re:Episode VII "Opening Starfield Text" by valintin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Their only hope is to unearth secret hiding place where Darth Vader put the carbonite block containing the body of the legendary General Jar-Jar Binks.

    2. Re:Episode VII "Opening Starfield Text" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 5 years ago I designed a star wars roleplaying game campaign along a similar theme... a member of our group got his (human) character stranded on Endor (I think we didn't rescue him because we didn't like him...). He went insane and led the Ewoks on a Dune-style crusade.

      I still have my sketches of cobbled-together Ewok suicide ships and battlecruisers.

  209. Star Wars!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey i have always wondered why more women arn't running for president...i mean the first woman president is almost garanteed to be imortalized on some sort of dollar bill or at least the one dollor coin. If i was a woman i would run for president just on that off chance..i guess Hilary will probably get it...just imagin in the future you will pay for gas at 3 Hillarys and a carbon credit per gallon..what has this to with star wars you may be asking....well George Lucus sucks thats what.

    stendec@gmail.com

  210. Not Anything Surprising by illumina+us · · Score: 1

    Seeing as how all 9 episodes where conceived at once and simply written down on paper at different times this seems hardly surprising and hinting that the denials of sequels were nothing more than marketing ploys.

    --
    -illumina+us "I put on my robe and wizard hat..."
  211. They're called "freedom fighters", asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least George Lucas hasn't killed anyone, while money to UNICEF regularly goes into aid that's then diverted in-country by murdering dictators.

    Anybody to whom to UN gives money is, by definition, a good sort. This is confirmed by the UN High Commission on Human rights: Both Syria AND Libya agree that all of these so-called "dictators" are actually nice guys, who just happen to be forced by circumstances (usually it's the US that makes them do it) to murder a few hundred thousand folks who might like to vote against them, if there were any elections. Elections are a Western hegemonist-colonialist white-people thing anyway. All those natural, instinctive third world people with their colorful native garb and intuitive wisdom don't need that stuff. They don't need food either; that's why frankencrops are SOOO EVIL.

    People in the Third World have natural rhythm, too. They're better than we are. That's why we're responsible for anything insane, stupid, or self-destructive that they might happen to do: Obviously nobody would do anything evil without good reason, right? I mean, except for Americans. They always do evil things without good reason. But that's different. Why is it different? Because I'm your mother and I say so. Shut up. If you don't agree with me, you're a racist. You must be a racist if you don't understand that those poor third world people just can't help themselves. Only a racist would think that non-white folks might be capable of working out their own problems without handouts from UNICEF. Right?

  212. Whoa! Wait a minute! by Whatthehellever · · Score: 1

    Let's stop and analyze this for a moment. EP3 may not suck that much after all (As long as Jar Jar is left out of it). After all, we KNOW how it's going to end.

    The beginning of "A New Hope" opened with a downer. Vader and his team of bell-bottomed troops overtook the ship carrying Leia and kidnapped her.

    We called that a "good movie".

    EP5 ended with a downer (Oh god, he's going into an argument we saw in Kevin Smith's "Clerks".) as Luke lost a hand, found out Vader was his father and the whole nine years...

    Now, with EP3, we KNOW how it ends. Another downer. Who cares what the script is like, we'll all go see it for "closure" and complete the whole Disney_Circle_Of_Life thingy.

    On a personal note, I'd like to see Jar Jar's car break down somewhere and he decides to check the fuel level by striking a match and peeking down the gas-hole.

    --

    ---
    IMHO, of course.
    May the SOURCE be with you.
  213. George Lucas, Master of Timing by DCheesi · · Score: 1

    Oh, great! When people wanted a sequel trilogy, he refused to consider it. Now that everyone wishes he would just stop, he decides to continue!

  214. He said he was going to make them, really, he did! by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    Years ago! I posted about this some time ago, but sadly I'm not a paid subscriber so I can't provide a link to my post form some time ago. That said, I'll retell it in an abbreviated version.

    Many years ago GL and company were traveling the country promoting a new Star Wars movie. I seem to recall it being ROTJ. I remeber there being a band playing music and GL up ther eon the bandshell in downtown along with a couple of people dressed up like Jawas with him. (Not to mention that I had just been up at the local Mall and had my picture taken with Chewie and Vader.) So anyhow, the point being that I remember Gl saying he was going to do a total of 9 films, each one 3 years apart, over 21 years. Obviously that didn't happen. And if only I could provide some hard evidence other than a distinct childhood memory. Maybe I just fabricated teh whole experience as a dream. But for me, I know! He said he was going to make them. Just never did and dashed the hopes of a littel kid. Oh well...

  215. Where's all those? by DMNT · · Score: 1

    I watched on my vacation all published SW movies with my girlfriend who has never watched them all. During that I thought what's different between the old episodes and the new ones. I remember I've seen episodes like 10 times each in my childhood, my (and my brother's and sister's) favorite movie was the Return of the Jedi.

    Lines like that were one part that was present in the original trilogy, but not found in Episodes I and II. Short snappy comments, like Finnish couple that has been married to each other for 40 years talking to each other.

    How did R2D2 and C-3PO talk to each other? Leia and Han Solo? The movie lived by their relations. There was some try with Anakin and Queen Amidala, but that was all quite expectable and straightforward.

    What I'd like to see in next episode is the living characters, their snappy way of commenting each other and evolving characters in the movie. Little things that together build the feel of Star Wars movie.

    --
    ?SYNTAX ERROR
    1. Re:Where's all those? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget Lucas's most important contribution to filming that he has never duplicated, for any reason whatsoever.

      Casting for the very first star wars movie wasn't done based on individuals reading lines. He took groups of actors, stuck them together to play out the scenes, and then hired the one that worked the best with each other. He casted for chemistry and team effort rather than raw acting ability.

      That's why we got hung with such acting virtuosos as Mark Hamil and Carrie Fisher. (Just to be true, Carrie Fisher did wind up doing a decent job with her role in the later movies, as well as she could anyway. Until ROTJ, she was a kickin'ass and taking down the names chick. Then they turned her into a soft, warm, and fuzzy woman)

      Harrison Ford is probably the only actor in the whole thing that was worth a shit. (James Earl Jones was already well-established in his career, wasn't he? If not, then he's the other actor worth a shit that came out of it.)

      (Oh yeah, Billy Dee Williams rocks my world, but he was picked for that movie because he was a name, and they made enough off the first one to attract names. In fact, there was even talk of replacing Mark Hamill, which probably would have been a good move considering how he worked out to be just as pompous an ass as Lucas himself in the third movie)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  216. OK people, let's just get out all the permutations by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 4, Funny

    *ahem*

    Interesting how a post titled funny can be rated insightful!

    Interesting how a post titled insightful can be rated funny!

    Funny how a post titled insightful can be interesting!

    Funny how a post titled interesting can be insightful!

    Insightful how a post titled funny can be interesting!

    Insightful how...

    Oh, never mind. My soul has already been destroyed by this pointless, unfunny, whorish beaten-dead-horse of a post! I hope you're happy.

    *sniff*

  217. NO NO NO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ANH: good
    ESB: excellent
    ROTJ: awful
    TPM: awful
    AOTC: awful

    actually I don't even remember what the last two were about, so I guess I should say so awful you will forget what they are about.

    stendec@gmail.com

    1. Re:NO NO NO!!! by XO · · Score: 1

      The only thing I remember about ESB is snow.. and more snow.. and.. hmm..

      snow.

      Whomever thinks that Boba Fett is the ultimate badass is really out there. Boba Fett didn't do a damn thing in any of the movies. He had more scenes in AOTC than in the other three combined.. and that's just presuming that Boba Fett is Jango Fett's kid, and not his grandkid.

      I think this whole "Boba Fett is awesome" deal might've started when the original Boba Fett action figure was recalled because of the shooting rocket deal that could potentially poke kids eyes out.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    2. Re:NO NO NO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I fully agree with you about Boba Fett - the only time you even HEAR his NAME is in RotJ, and only really then if you know what you're listening for. He was a bit-part, made more important in the new trilogy to either a) pander to fans or b) avoid coming up with yet another new character. My bet is on a, because coming up with new characters is not hard, but making them likeable (*coughjar* *coughjar*) is.

      But ESB is not bad - there's not as much action, but there is:
      • Luke's growing ability with the force, both untutored on Hoth and tutored by Yoda (and Yoda's so cool he deserves his own bullet point, but I will resist the urge)
      • More background on the nature of the force and the Jedi 'religion' (or whatever)
      • Bizarre incestuous sexual tension and a hint of another Skywalker
      • A fairly mediocre duel actionwise that is nonetheless far more emotionally engaging than the visually superb fight with Darth Maul (not just because of the retarded conclusion)
      • An ending to the movie that doesn't feel like a television sitcom.


      Also, I'd just like to say anyone who hates RotJ because of the Ewoks is suffering from the same teenage boy delusion that claims Nintendo makes a kiddie console. Usually these are the same people who rate a movie based on it's special effects...
    3. Re:NO NO NO!!! by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I think it's the whole "masked man" phenomenom. As soon as Vader was demasked, everyone thought he was a pussy dissapointment. Same thing with Jango/Boba Fett.

      Everyone says Lucas ruined Star Wars. But Lucas CREATED Star Wars. It's not like he's Rick Berman riding Gene Roddenberry's corpse and running the franchise into utter stupidity.

      At some point, Lucas' vision diverged from the obsessed Star Wars geek crowd. They had too much time to stew and write their own poorly written scripts. They all had time to create their own idiotic foggy ideas about what things should be like.

      I'll give everyone the outrageous stupidity of Jar-Jar Binks. But Phantom Menace has some profound implications about how free societies can be taken over by their own best intentions.

      Many people absoluetly HATED the movie "Elizabeth". I absoluetly LOVED it. It dealt with politics and changing the world (for better or worse) with something OTHER than a gun.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    4. Re:NO NO NO!!! by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I never was really impressed with Boba Fett, since all he did in ESB was fire a few blaster shots at Luke and take a bit of an unusual path to track the Falcon. Other than that, he just said stupid annoying things. I think the reason he's considered a bad ass is because Vader has to caution him especially "No disintegrations".

      In fact, Boba Fett turned into a clumsy buffoon in ROTJ, so it's not like he ever got good.

      Jango Fett, on the other hand, is quite a badass, and his fight with Obi-Wan is probably the best thing in the new movies and easily stands alongside Luke's first lightsaber duel with Vader as an epic battle of superhero vs super villain. They were playing for keeps, and it's a hell of a battle.

      Hard to believe Jango got taken out so easily by a simple amateurish charge by a determined Jedi, but he was probably still recovering from his fight with Obi-Wan.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    5. Re:NO NO NO!!! by XO · · Score: 1

      I'm certain that there was a bit to pandering to the fans, but .. really.. I don't know if it was the original plan to use Boba Fett's daddy (or granddaddy? did they ever say his son is Boba?) to create the clones.. though everyone knew of the general idea of the clone wars.. but pretty ingenious, if it hadn't been the original plan (maybe boba was supposed to have a larger part in the original movies, but the finances weren't there.. or something?), to recycle characters, and have it mean so much more.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    6. Re:NO NO NO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if it was the original plan to use Boba Fett's daddy (or granddaddy? did they ever say his son is Boba?) to create the clones

      I doubt it... much like I doubt the origin of the force was intended to be "midichlorians", or that Anakin created C3PO.

    7. Re:NO NO NO!!! by XO · · Score: 1

      In the case of Anakin building C3PO, and the case of all the clones being based on Mr. Fett.. well, that just all works out for the better anyway.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  218. WWOWD (What Would Obi-Wan Do)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    George Lucas: "When last we met I was but a learner. Now I am the master."

    Obi-Wan: "Only a master of evil, George!"

    (George strikes Obi-Wan down and proceeds to release the "Double Secret Probation Special Editions" for Episodes 0-XV. Meanwhile the fans scream as if they just learned Darth Vader was their father.)

  219. Reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NDA's were signed because the initial development of the properties (7, 8, & 9) is not being preformed 'in house'. The communications between the ILM/LS teams and a 'new' creative team is being guarded is all this attributed to. From what I can tell--and it's not a whole lot at this point--this means our 'big' boss is taking a more hands-off approach to the initial development of 7, 8, & 9 (feasibility, technologies, $$$ issues, the normal stuff, etc.). Also, it's important to note that this is definitely not a guarantee of more SW to come; there are a lot of NDA's signed around here for projects that never take off. Since we seem to be so fond of anonymity around here ;) take this FWIW: 'sketchy insight' from an anonymous coward.

  220. Elephantine prior art... by Cassander · · Score: 1

    >I almost fell on my butt when I saw the giant
    >elephants in Return Of The King. "You mean
    >Lucas stole the AT-ATs from Tolkien??" I had
    >always thought the idea of elephant-like
    >walking tanks was brilliant, turns out he stole
    >that too.

    Tolkein didn't exactly come up with it himself, either....

    A couple links from google for your reading pleasure:

    http://www.pass.to/HannaVisioN/hannibal.htm

    http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0770041.html

    --
    Knowledge != Intelligence
  221. I don't blame him by Ucklak · · Score: 1

    As much as we bitch about how much these prequels suck, there is an audience that actually enjoys them.

    I (we) hate them with a passion but today's 8 year olds love them and Jar Jar too. Yes they do.

    Lucas might have ruined our childhood but he's giving a new childhood memorable sequences. And believe it or not, today's kids really don't like our version.

    I about choked when a 12 year old told me that Star Wars (Episode IV) looked old and Phantom Menace was better.

    Lucas is actually pretty smart in realizing how to capitalize on his new audience because we're suckers for paying for it anyway. With 10 years more of movie making for this story line, there will be yet another audience.

    I just hope that Sky Captain and The World of Tomorrow is better.

    --
    if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    1. Re:I don't blame him by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I really don't care what 12 year olds think.

      What's more important, however, is the movies' gross incomes. I don't have a link, but I recall Ep. 2 drawing in far less money than Ep. 1 did, even though it cost at least as much to make. Its gross was quite disappointing compared to blockbusters like Spider-Man.

      What this means is that, while there are plenty of suckers out there who will watch new Star Wars movies no matter how bad they suck, there's enough discriminating viewers out there who are checking with reviews, ratings, friends, etc. that it's making a huge impact on these movies' bottom lines. If this trend is followed, with the prequels sucking really hard and people becoming more and more wary of them, Ep. 3 may do very poorly at the box office (like the recent Catwoman). So poorly, in fact, that it may not even be economical to bother producing Episodes 7-9.

      If Lucas were really smart, he'd admit to himself that he sucks at writing screenplays and dialog, and get an expert to do it like he did with Empire Strikes Back. But this seems very unlikely to happen.

    2. Re:I don't blame him by jokell82 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't have a link, but I recall Ep. 2 drawing in far less money than Ep. 1 did, even though it cost at least as much to make. Its gross was quite disappointing compared to blockbusters like Spider-Man

      You're right that it didn't make as much as Episode 1 (or nearly as much as A New Hope). But Episode 2 is the 17th highest grossing film of all time. Kind of hard to be disappointed by that. I'm sure DVD sells weren't too shabby either.

      My source

      If Lucas were really smart, he'd admit to himself that he sucks at writing screenplays and dialog, and get an expert to do it like he did with Empire Strikes Back. But this seems very unlikely to happen.

      TOTAL agreement there.

      --
      I dunno who it is
      but it prolly is fhqwhgads.
    3. Re:I don't blame him by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much the two (Ep 1 & 2) cost to make? That would provide better insight into how profitable they were.

      This list is a little bogus, however: it's comparing movies that earned money in completely different decades, and not accounting for inflation. Ep1 is only barely below the original Star Wars, but the latter was released 20 years earlier, when it didn't cost nearly $8 to watch a movie. If this list could be corrected with inflation data (which would be extremely difficult because the "lifetime sales" includes VHS and DVD sales as well over a long period of time, over which inflation has steadily risen), a very different picture would emerge of which movies were truly the most popular.

    4. Re:I don't blame him by jokell82 · · Score: 1

      If adjusted for inflation, Gone with the Wind would be the highest grossing movie of all time, with A New Hope being second.

      --
      I dunno who it is
      but it prolly is fhqwhgads.
  222. Let someone else direct. by Maul · · Score: 1

    Sure, go ahead. Just let someone else write and direct them. There are a lot of great ideas in Episodes 1 and 2, but for some reason Lucas couldn't carry them through to be movies on par with the originals.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  223. No, we wouldn't! by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    I think that's a silly argument. If they were brilliantly written and directed, people would LOVE that and be relieved. We're not as smarmy and critical as you make us out to be. We're just disappointed in some shitty prequel movies.

  224. Canonical Reference by notcreative · · Score: 4, Funny

    CBG: Last night's episode of Itchy & Scratchy was the Worst Episode Ever. Rest assured, I was on the internet within moments, registering my disgust throughout the world.

    BART: Hey man, what gives you the right to complain?

    CBG: As a loyal fan, I feel they owe me.

    Bart: They've given you hours of entertainment for free. How could they possibly owe you? If anything, you owe them.

    CBG: (pause) Worst. Episode. Ever.

    1. Re:Canonical Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only read here and never post but that was hilarious! Thank You!

  225. Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How a post titled...

    forget it

  226. Re:Philip Kaufman by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
    The secret to this is that it is possible to read about something and for it to still not be true

    If it's on the internet, it MUST be true!

  227. Princess Leia said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Into the garbage chute, flyboy!"

  228. Three Words: Grand Admiral Thrawn. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 0

    Lucas' interest in making the sequels could be good news. It could represent the only chance that the excellent Timothy Zahn novels be adapted into the screenplays. We can always hope he could exhibit common sense and let a more capable writer handle the task.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  229. duh - money grubbing wh8re by Down8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Lucas has lost all relation to any art or insight in his sifi adventure. He is solely in the business to make money on crappy movies. So, even tho there wasn't any 7/8/9, he's gonna do it, just b/c he wants to make money of his former insight form ppl who don't car that his new stuff sucks. Lucky for me, I didn't think his old stuff was that great to begin with.

    -bZj

    --
    .sig
  230. Hrmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 more opportunities to destroy the franchise and completely outweigh the good with the bad....

  231. "Restless Soul of the Dagger" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found myself thinking "huh?" once or twice in the first paragraph. Look at Heinlein's first paragraphs: It's instantly clear what's happening (at least on a very narrow, tactical level: You know who just hit who; "why" can wait). It's crucial to draw the reader in at that point, and at that point, it's like you're buttonholing a stranger on the subway: It's up to you to get him interested. Once he's hooked, you can make greater demands, but that first paragraph has to go down real easy.

    A shadow snaked across Rone's face, giving his eyes a brief respite from the punishing rays of the sun. The tears welling up in his eyes only helped to focus the rays, stinging his eyes and forcing him to cover them with his bloody forearm. ...

    Too much redundant noise. The tears aren't likely to be welling out of his armpit, are they? Why so much about the sun? The sun's incidental. You're keeping the focus on peripheral stuff, while the action is happening sotto voce, in subordinate clauses.

    Ain't gonna work that way. You've got the elements of a solid, workable first scene here, which is cool. All that's wrong is structure, not content. I suggest something like the following:

    First paragraph is one line, in quotation marks: Torg yelling at Rone about the tools. The whole scene happens in the context of the dynamic between those two, and the yelling establishes that (or, rather, as much of that as the reader wants to know at this point).

    Rone protests, backs away, catches his foot on the blue thing, falls on his ass.

    Torg comes at Rone. Rone tries to scoot away, Torg kicks at Rone, Rone notices the blue thing, etc.

    Now you've got the two kids yanking at the blue thing, their respective characters and the relationship between them are provisionally established, and most importantly, the reader's not sitting there saying "what the fuck?". For all the volume of authorial chitchat in your version, the reader still doesn't have any clear picture of the action. How did Rone end up on the ground? Was he facing toward Torg, or running away? Not significant to the plot, but significant to let the reader get his bearings. As it is, the reader is mighty confused. If that's what you want, well, you're just plain wrong (Heinlein and Larry Niven have sold millions of books, and you're still self-publishing on a blog, so please consider the possibility that they know more than you about how to make a story work). Opening scenes are a solved problem. But it's your book. If you don't want anybody to read it, that's your business.

    You've clearly done more homework than the average amateur author: You've got a clear conflict, you're starting out with action instead of a history lesson or misguided pseudo-poetics, you're not attempting a "heroic voice" (it's hard to do that voice well; the likes of you and me are wise to leave it to Tolkien), and you're moving along quickly to plot mechanics (at least, it seems clear to me from the first page that the Blue Thing is the lever that sets the whole deal in motion). You've also wisely avoided the cardinal sin of amateurs: Overly-precise description. They always want you to know the exact dimensions of every room, and exactly how many windows there are, and it's all just a bunch of crap getting in the way.

    (Oh, and where are they, by the way? A village, I assume, but you might clarify that. Oh, and WTF is with "snaked", for the shadow? I'm not getting that at all. I'd advise you not to be too clever and sophisticated with language. Keep it simple, keep the focus on the story. And if you find yourself trying to do two different things with the same sentence, back up, decide which of the two things is more important, and write two sentences in the appropriate order -- or maybe sneak one of the two ideas in in a more appropriate space in the previous line, previous paragraph, whatever -- or better yet, one of the two ideas frequently turns out to be superfluous anyway.)

    1. Re:"Restless Soul of the Dagger" by Bonewalker · · Score: 1
      Well, thank you, AC. This is a good, solid critique that I can't get from friends and family.

      Your observations are good and you clearly put your time into really reading the story, so I appreciate your investment.

      I will take the best parts and make myself a better writer.

      Curious, though, about what you thought of the rest of the story, or if you only read the first chapter or so?

      Thanks.

    2. Re:"Restless Soul of the Dagger" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Of course, you know what free advice is worth... :)

      Curious, though, about what you thought of the rest of the story, or if you only read the first chapter or so?

      The stuff I discussed was as far as I got before I got wrapped up in bombarding you with free advice.

  232. NDA - Never Doubt Advertising by BrynM · · Score: 1

    Geek: Will there be more Star Wars Movies?
    Jr. Engineer: I can't tell you that. Lucas made us sign NDAs pertaining to Episodes 7-9.
    Geek: Didn't you just break your NDA by telling me you have an NDA?
    Jr. Engineer: Doh!
    Pink slip with cash bonus is left on Jr. Engineer's desk the next morning signed "Thanks for the plug and renewing the speculation, but rules are rules. - George"

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  233. What Lucas *should* do by popo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not withstanding Lucas' seemingly awesome ability to f*ck things up... this should come as pretty great news. Why? Because hopefully Lucas will do two things:

    1) Hire directors and stay out of the director's chair himself. Lucas is a far better visionary than he is a director. When he gets to close to the director's chair we get cutesy sh*t that even kids think is gay.

    2) Draw from any of the truly great (non George Lucas) Star Wars fiction that exists. Let's face it: Timothy Zahn writes better Star Wars than Lucas ever did. Hell, even the Star Wars comic series (Marvel) was better written than anything by Lucas.

    Bottom line: Lucas should paint in big strokes. He's got a great talent for epic space opera. He's got a lousy talent for actualizing it.

    ______
    Judge a man by his wallet

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  234. So? by jemenake · · Score: 1

    This means nothing. All the article really says is that everybody at ILM has had to sign an agreement not to talk about the possibility of more episodes.

    Provided that George Lucas, himself, has had to agree not to discuss the possibility as well, then I have to ask: Isn't this what we've all been hoping for all this time? I, for one, have been praying to my god every night that I wouldn't hear George Lucas talk about any more episodes. - Joe

  235. Obligatory Star Wars Quote by scoser · · Score: 2, Funny
    Me: "No, that's not true, that's impossible!"

    Lucas: "Search your feelings, you know it to be true."

    Me: "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!"

  236. I USED TO like Star Wars. by Theovon · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The original three movies were great. I would watch them over and over again. Then episodes 1 and 2 came out and it ruined the whole thing for me. The new movies were so bad that they tained the whole Star Wars experience for me, and now I can't stand to watch even the old ones.

    So, what's Lucas up to this time? It's hard to ruin it any more than he already has!

  237. I am genuinely looking forward to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a lot of very predictable whines and jokes on here from very jaded cynical geeks who think it makes them seem cool and hip to bash star wars.
    I was 7 when SW came out. It changed movies forever. There was NO sfx before star wars, no attempt to do movies with a backstory or universe the wy he did. He worked from outisde the traditionl hollywood system and basically changed the movie industry forever.
    He also put a lot of money into video games very early on. The guy is practically a walking advert for how pushing the technological envelope is a good thing. He is, in many way a geek hero.
    Yet suddenly everyone hates the guy.
    For those ranting about GL, I have one thing to say:
    Doom III.
    Why is it that carmack is a l33t dood, and doom 3 is just as cool and fresh and exciting and in no way a cynical cash in of the same game done again and again, whereas the new star wars films are somehow some kind of betrayal?
    I sense double standards in the force....

    Im not saying the last 2 movies are works of high art, but is the world a better place because george lucas is in it? hell yes. Its about time we cut the guy some slack. He totally transformed the entertainmnet industry. he has earned the right to leave some crummy dialog in his films.

  238. Re:He said he was going to make them, really, he d by taradfong · · Score: 1

    You're not the only one that heard this...it's a pretty well-known rumor

    --
    Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  239. Yeah, I know... by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    I figured I should put one "truth" in there to make the whole thing more legitimate.

    Honestly, I'm kind of happy he's going to do it... But I'm also afraid that he's going to keep sucking...

  240. Yes but... by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    We will still be assaulted by the unavoidable media that will surround it. The only thing worse than the first prequel itself was the onslaught of marketing that it came oozing in on.

  241. Crazy Theory by taradfong · · Score: 1

    Supposedly, Episodes I-III were delayed until the technology existed to do the creature animations. I remember hearing Jurassic Park was in some ways a test of that technology.

    Ok, so what's the next frontier? My guess is, 100% digital actors. That is, you could actually have the original Han Solo (or even Alec Guiness!) in a 2010 movie using a digital composite of his 1977 footage. I guess Spiderman II already did more of this than most viewers realized even for close up shots.

    I'm taking a wild stab here, but I think the ability to pull this off is arriving quicker than GL expected, and he wants to use Epidsodes 7-9 to be the breakthrough movie, just as Episodes 4-6 were for model/motion photography and 1-3 were for organic CGI.

    --
    Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  242. 3 out of 9? by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

    Well, then. If the ratio of good SW movies to bad SW movies decreases to only 3 out of 9, will anybody care about the franchise at all?

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  243. God Damn Them All by abb3w · · Score: 1
    whatever would fans have to complain about?

    Harry Potter Numbers 4, 5, 6, and 7.

    Fantastic Four, Iron Man.

    X-Men 3, Spiderman 3.

    The non-existence of a Farscape movie; the ineptitude of the production of the Farscape movie when it exists.

    The Hobbit (for existing, if done without Jackson; for taking forever, if done with Jackson).

    King Kong.

    Oh, and I have over a decade worth of complaining left on the existance of the Vintar "I, Robot" movie and the non-existance of an Ellison "I, Robot" movie.

    That get us to 2014 yet?

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  244. How to win a job as Director for a LucasFilm by yuud · · Score: 4, Funny

    scene: George Lucas and a horde of head-bobbing clones are all seated around a table.
    (you, a dashing job applicant, walk in, head bobbing already like some dashboard toy)

    George: Hi there!
    You: Yes.
    George (flicking through CV): so, it says here that you have no experience with the film industry at all--
    You: Yes!
    George:-- but I see here listed under hobbies that you are completely malleable, have no free will and enjoy words starting with Y?
    You: Yes!
    George (stroking fat-neck hiding beard, then punches this question out with a keen gaze and pointed finger): Hrm, so tell me your greatest skill!
    You: Yes!
    George (leaning back to crowd of yes-men): We gotta hire this guy.
    Crowd of goons: Yes! (with head bobbing)
    One goon trying to impress: Ya-huh! (George's scowl wipes the smile off his face)
    You: Yes!

  245. How about both? by hellfire · · Score: 1

    How about a SW fan who mailed $50 to UNICEF last year and went to the midnight show of episode I AND II with his best friend?

    Yanno I have no problem with not liking SW, but frankly I'm insulted by your sweeping bullshit generalizations. My favorite charity happens to be UNICEF and my favorite movies of all time are the original trilogy.

    Judging the movies is just fine. Judging the fans makes YOU smell like the ass of a baboon.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:How about both? by scowling · · Score: 1

      And you are the evidence that somewhere, in some farm in middle America, there exists a chicken with teeth.

      Except that the chicken's knee-jerk reaction is more impressive.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    2. Re:How about both? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up! The author described with great elegance and wit the exact thoughts I had about the grandparent's post. I love how people try to "disprove" other peoples statistically natured claims by giving themself as one of a few counterexamples.

  246. No, no, no! You've all been fooled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will start with episode X, XI, and XII, and only THEN will you see VII, VIII, and IX.

  247. Mea Culpa by Louis+Savain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're right, although I don't think that was the main subject of the movie. But then again, I may be wrong again. Blade Runner touched on so many things, it's hard to unravel them and isolate the most important.

    1. Re:Mea Culpa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What does it mean to be human?" is the main subject of the movie.

  248. Desensitized are you, bad films, these are not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point I want to make, is the majority of posters, who no longer think of the SW franchise as one of the best (ruining childhood dreams, etc.) are simply desensitized to the whole experience.

    Let's look at some arguments.

    How old were you in 1977 when Star Wars first came out? And how excited did you feel?

    I was 13 and thought it was the greatest movie ever made. Why? The "why" is an exercise in film making analysis.

    - Up until SW (1977), no other science fiction, space based film had made a profit, so it was risking to do one. This is why it took Lucas a while to find a studio that would give him money to do it.
    - Up until SW (1977), no other film had used the kind of special effect that Lucas wanted/needed/produced. Lucas has even admited himself that he couldn't do everything he wanted, hence the re-vamped SE versions.
    - Therefore, the audience (that's you and me back in 1977) were presented with something that had never ben done before successfully.
    - The special effects were out of this world, they made you feel like you were 'there'. There are many elements that made SW great, and they were al either new, or a re-emergence of old ideas.

    The rest is history really. Yes, most people didn't like ESB, but really liked ROTJ. But lets look deeper at what else was going on.

    - Lucas established Industrial Light and Magic.
    - A LOT of other studios start renting the talent at ILM for their own movies.
    - The ground-breaking special affects are now being used everywhere.
    - The audience is now "used to it".

    Go back and think about Terminator 2, then flash forward to Matrix. Each movie had ground breaking special effects. Each movie was awesome.

    Now let's go back and review an original copy of SW. Looks pretty campy now doesn't it? Why did it look so much better 27 years ago? Because it was new, and we were young. The newness has worn off; the original now looks like any other movie, with nothing special about it.

    It's kind of like buying a brand new car, the very first one ever to have anti-lock brakes, air-bags, automatic seat-belts, A/C, adjustable seats, blah, blah, blah. Then,20 years later, all cars have the same accessories, so looking back at your 20 year old ground breaking car, it looks kind of dull now, doesn't it?

    Now, ask almost any person under the age of 13 what they thought of Episode I, or even II. I know some kids who pick those over any other movie out there. Those two movies are THE BEST ever, in their opinion.

    So who's right?

    Second case, plotlines.

    We've all become so accustomed to outlandish and far-fetched plotlines, as well as complex, devious, subvertive, sexual, and make-my-brain-hurt plotlines, that we expect every movie that comes -after- to be -better- than the last. Helloooo, wake up.

    Let's go back to SW (1977), and how great you thought it was, but now looking back, it was wooden, stiff, no plot, etc. Well, it certainly was a big hit 27 years ago? What changed?

    What changed was -your- social perceptions. SW (1977) is still the same great movie it used to be. Watch it through the eyes of a 10 year old.

    In fact, I find the plotlines in the last two Episodes, to be deeper and more complex than the original three movies. Yes, there is more to it. But you can't expect "Matrix meets Star Trek, battling Aliens against Predators in the biohazard world of DOOM 3 on the third Deathstar". C'mon, get a clue.

    Reality versus Fantasy.

    Yes, SW was fantasy, bear with this argument for a moment. "The Matrix", was the first movie that -used a plotline- to blur the distinction between reality and fantasy. They used fantasy in order to help explain reality; they made reality look like a "mind game" and used the fantasy to explain it.

    All other movies like "T2", use fantasy in unreal ways to support plotlines. They tried to make certain affect look real, but part of still knew that in "our world" it was just impossible (at

    1. Re:Desensitized are you, bad films, these are not. by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      I wish you hadn't posted anonyously because I'd mark you "friend." You've summed up a lot of what I've been saying repeatedly to the whiners since Episode 1 came out. I went into the theater expecting only to be taken back to the world I'd known and loved when I was a kid and the movie delivered better than I expected. The lightsaber battle of Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan against Darth Maul was intense and felt epic and dangerous the way the fights between Luke and Vader did in the originals. It was a revelation to see the "swamp Jedi" finally in his real surroundings as part of the coucil, to see the inner workings of the Jedi, to see how bogged down and ineffectual the Republic had become that we'd heard so much about, to see a slightly uppity Obi-Wan Kenobi having that fateful argument with Yoda about continuing Anakin's training, and the quaint coincidence of R2 coming from Luke's mother's home planet and 3PO coming from Luke's father's home planet. In short, I was blown away--here it all was, the fabled backstory I had always imagined in a vague sort of way. Yes, the film was flawed; it ran a tad long, was a little chatty at points and could have benefitted from a little less Jar-Jar, but I've never been able to relate to the nonstop whining.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  249. We don't have nearly enough Futurama quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fool me 7 times, shame on you. Fool me 8 or more times, shame on me.

  250. Funny by oO+Peeping+Tom+Oo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's funny how a post titled insightful can be moderated funny. Let the karma roll in! Everyone! Join the scam!

  251. Intentions change by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 2, Informative
    of course these episodes 7, 8, and 9 will have nothing to do with any of his original intentions. But. Lucas's intentions change all the time. Here's some interesting quotes:

    Spring 1980 SW newsletter(Bantha Tracks):

    "BT: At one point there were going to be twelve Star Wars films.

    GL: I cut that number down to nine because the other three were tangential to the saga. Star Wars was the fourth story in the saga and was to have been called, "Star Wars, Episode Four: A New Hope." But I decided people wouldn't understand the numbering system so we dropped it. For Empire, though we're putting back the number and will call it Episode Five: The Empire Strikes Back. After the third film in this trilogy we'll go back and make the first trilogy, which deals with the young Ben Kenobi and the young Darth Vader.

    BT: What is the third trilogy about?

    GL: It deals with the character that survives Star Wars III and his adventures."

    1995 reprint of the ESB novel:

    GL:"From the onset I conceived Star Wars as a series of six films, or two trilogies."

    But, of course, nothing's set in stone. Even if it was, George would change it.

    And ... BTW ... are the folks at ILM the biggest snitches on the planet or what. They sign a non-disclosure agreement, then tell people that they just signed one. Jeeze, guys. Let us have some mystery in our lives, will ya.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  252. Could someone PLEASE put this out of its misery? by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    As with the Star Trek Franchise, the Star Wars franchise needs to be shot dead for about 10 years. I'm so sick of "trilogy" movies that the first one is usually good, the rest try to suck the life out of the others to the point you can't stand any of them. When Star Trek revived the "originals" back in the late 70's, and then redid the tv version in the 80's, when the original crew ended, and the TV series ended they should have just stopped for about 5 or 6 years. There isn't any originality in scripts anymore :(

  253. Re:Great! Warning spoiler by XO · · Score: 1

    I see lots of people talking about a remade 4,5,6.. i get this funny feeling it's not gonna happen, though.

    Even George isn't that stupid.. unless we're talking about King George the Bush...

    Ep 2 I think was just about as good as any of 4,5,6. Just in the late 70's / early 80's, no one had ever made movies like this before. Now, there's a lot more of them.

    What race of being is a Jar Jar anyway? And how long do they live??

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  254. Oh great... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    Extrapolating from the first trilogy to the second and through to the third I think we'll be having some real competition for "Manos: The Hands of Fate"

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  255. Obi Wan says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of childhood memories suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.

  256. MegaFLOPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've already written Lucas off, completely.

    Business. Expense.

    However, I do find it immensely interesting that the first 3 films did so well. It is obvious that the crew he was working with (namely, Steven Speilburg), as well as the limitations of special effects at the time, propelled the story rather than the CGI. I see a fast-pased video game, with actors just reading their script lines and nodding. Very little acting. At +$10 million an actor, I would certainly be requiring them to actually do their job rather than hone their auctioneer abilities. Lucas has money to burn this time through, however...

    I forsee a total of 6 flops.

    Mega. FLOPS.

  257. female antagonist? by snooo53 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think it would be interesting if they had a female antagonist this time around in the 3rd movie. I can't remember a single female in the other movies with a position in the Empire or with the dark side of the force.

    The thing that scares me though, if Lucas did end up doing that, I can just see him writing a hokey script along the lines of Star trek 8 (first contact)

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
  258. "Great shot, kid! That was one in a million!" by imac_mafia · · Score: 1
    Right on! I, too, wish you weren't posting anonymously. Well-said. I'm sure some of the whiners will pick your post apart and invent all sorts of excuses for believing you're wrong. But you're dead-on! There's something I call a "pleasure capacity." A lot of people who once enjoyed the orginal Star Wars have grown up and, unfortunately, lost their "pleasure capacity." They're too concerned with "being adult", and "being adult" includes picking apart the Star Wars films, whining and complaining, and basically blaming Lucas for their own inability to just let go of their desire to criticize, insult, and pick things apart. And if somebody (like us) is still capable of locking away our jaded, snobby "smarter-than-thou" inner critic and just enjoying the films, then the people who aren't enjoying them feel they have to attack us. Shame on us for enjoying Episodes I and II, right? The only part of your post I question is where you said
    no other science fiction, space based film had made a profit
    Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought 2001: A Space Odyssey turned a decent profit.
    --
    Check out what I'm working on! -- http://smaragd.DaveWard.net/
    1. Re:"Great shot, kid! That was one in a million!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about that, you are correct.

      I remember seeing 2001 between SW and ESB, thus my initial reaction. However, I just now checked the release date of 2001, and it was 1968. My bad.

  259. New Slashdot Poll by ozbird · · Score: 1
    Who should direct StarWars Episodes VII-IX?
    • George Lucas
    • Peter Jackson
    • Steven Spielberg
    • Ridley Scott
    • Quentin Tarrantino
    • Michael Moore
    • CowboyNeal
    1. Re:New Slashdot Poll by mikaw · · Score: 0

      My vote goes to Michael Moore. I would be so cool to finally to see the truth.

    2. Re:New Slashdot Poll by Yogger · · Score: 1

      Peter Jackson. Instead of using midgets, the ewoks will be done using full size wookies and then digitally shrunk.

  260. here's what i don't understand by tropavantgarde · · Score: 1
    ...how did lucas go from making a really rather excellent sci-fi flic earlier in his career (thx-1138) to these pieces of crap he's putting out now? shouldn't a director's films get better as opposed to worse as his career develops?

    oh wait...this is hollywood we're talking about. never mind.

    --

    --A witty sig proves nothing.--

  261. Somebody stop him.... by shoptroll · · Score: 1

    Can anyone say milking the cash cow?

    What next, a remake of the originals to keep them in line with the 3rd trilogy... Followed by a remake of the prequels to fix the inconsistencies between them and the "revised" originals. Followed by a remake of the new trilogy to make them consistent. Followed by a remake of the "revised" originals to make them consistent with the "revised" new trilogy. Followed by....

    I think he's invented the perpetual trilogy...

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  262. Ther Can Be Only One by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

    I watched Star Wars. In 1977.
    Haven't seen any of the sequels, or what Lucas seems to be calling 'Prequels.'
    I feel it would spoil the memory of the original.


    I saw it then, before it was "Part IV". The two sequels I thought boring, the first prequel I saw on DVD, the second I watched half. The original Star Wars had energy, good dialogue and decent acting. The whole concept wasn't original, but didn't pretend to be. It just went downhill from there. Basically, when Luke was the hero it worked. (Though no one could say Hamill was a great actor.) Han as hero was okay, but not very inspiring, after that Vader as hero is just absurd.

    Everyone knows: sequels suck. It's news when they don't.

    1. Re:Ther Can Be Only One by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      It was always part IV.

      It was just called "Star Wars" because when it was made, Lucas didn't know he was going to make more. He didn't even have a story beyond it, or before it. No ideas, nothing. He won't admit it now, but there's probably some footage floating around talking about it.

      He removed Jabba the Hutt's scene from the movie precisely because it was the only scene with him in it, and it didn't make sense to keep in the movie. Later on, when he made ROTJ, he wished he had left the scene in, except that he didn't want Jabba to be human anymore.

      Now, of course, Lucas says "Jabba always was a slug, and we shot the scene with a human as a placekeeper, intending to go back and add Jabba the Slug when we had the technology to do it".

      Gawd I can't stand that man anymore. ;( The only reason even one of those movies was ever any good was because he backed off and let people make it for him. Every other movie he's taken part in making has sucked ass. Even Episode IV, which has always been Episode IV, even when it was in the theater without a sequel in sight (I remember this well because I was the kid in the theater who asked why it was Episode IV and what the other movies were).

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:Ther Can Be Only One by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      It was always part IV.

      I saw it in its first run in 1977. I don't remember "Part IV". So do you have anything beyond your memory to dispute mine?

    3. Re:Ther Can Be Only One by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      No, except that there is plenty of evidence in existing films. Yeah, I know, they can change shit around all they want these days. no arguments about that. The scrolling text always said "Episode IV: A New Hope", even before "Episode V:" was in the works.

      So, no, nothing but my memory against yours, but while I don't knwo about yours, mine is one of those unswayable childhood memories. I cna't remember what I ate that day, but I do remember being the precocious and annoying three-year-old who read "Episode IV" out of the scrolling shit and impressing all the grown-ups. That's a pretty tough memory...

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:Ther Can Be Only One by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      No, except that there is plenty of evidence in existing films.

      We're talking about George "Greedo shot first" Lucas.

      I do remember being the precocious and annoying three-year-old who read "Episode IV"

      I was about 19. But as I remember, the "Part IV" was added shortly after the first release, perhaps when Lucas got some clout with its success. But I could be wrong. The web doesn't go back to that era, the facts are hard to come by.

    5. Re:Ther Can Be Only One by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to grant benefit of the doubt since there are numerous other posters that are even citing when it was added, and the times being cited generally correspond. Hopefully it's not the ol' "repeat it until it becomes fact".

      I do have memories of Star Wars that conflict with my parents' memories of me and Star Wars, and my siblings have been unable to resolve them.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    6. Re:Ther Can Be Only One by catisonh · · Score: 1

      The scrolling text always said "Episode IV: A New Hope", even before "Episode V:" was in the works. Episode IV: A New Hope was added only after TESB came out and Star Wars was rereleased. The original release made no reference to any episode or that it was part of any series of films. Its easy enough to tell that there were going to be other films, if nothing other than the reference to Luke's father being evil, and nothing revealed about it until TESB.

      --
      This post has been filtered for sanity.
    7. Re:Ther Can Be Only One by MaxWilder · · Score: 1

      Star Wars was released in the spring of 1977 without any mention of an episode number or name.

      It was re-released in the fall of the same year with the new "Episode IV: A New Hope", despite the fact that most theatres were still playing the original release.

      Many fans saw the film many times that year and into the next, and the last few times they saw the re-relaesed version without knowing the sub-title was missing from the original.

      NOBODY thought the movie would be popular enough for a sequel when it was originally released in a small handfull of theatres. But when it became a phenomenon, Lucas publicly revealed the fact that it was actually one part of a three trilogy saga.

      He decided to start in the middle because ANH was the most interesting part to Lucas at the time, and remains the most beloved for most of the fans.

  263. Carrie Fisher is still a hot MILF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad Luke iced Jabba the Hut in ROTJ

  264. Good. by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

    Let's hope that it all takes place post NJO novels involving the Yuuzhan Vong. That way they can use the original actors and actresses to reprise their roles from the original films.

  265. You are no mensa member. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The first trilogy was excellent."

    One word: Ewoks :)

  266. Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't funny!

  267. Balance to the Force by symbolset · · Score: 1

    No. In the old Empire, the Jedi Masters dominate the galaxy with the light side of the Force. Annakin brings Balance by helping to annihilate them. The fullfillment of the prophecy is eagerly anticipated by the Jedi Masters because they (and you) don't read the classics and so are unaware of the ironic nature of prophecy.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  268. so my prediction may come true? by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

    I've predicted all throughout the '90's and the--uh .. now's .. anyway--that once Lucas started running out of money, he'd change his mind about not making the 3rd trilogy.

    So .. he's out of money already?

    --
    Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  269. We've gone to plaid by crem_d_genes · · Score: 1

    Oh wait...

  270. The Only Way by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    ...episodes 7, 8, and 9 will not suck is if we can manage to put Lucas off the job long enough for him to die.

  271. But why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't we suffered enough?

    Best,
    Mal the Elder

  272. The droids memories were wiped ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    It's quite literal. Owen Lars orders Luke to wipe their memories in Episode IV. He obviously recognizes C3P0.

    I don't think that part is revision. The droids were ALWAYS meant to be in every episode. It was quite literal that everything happens from the droids perspective.

    Beyond that, I suspect that no one besides a tight circle know who Vader really is. If everyone in the Rebellion knew that Darth Vader was really Anikan Skywalker from Tatooine, do you think it would be a big mystery. No one knows that "the dark lord" (sidious) is really Palpatine. Everything the Sith does is in secret. Why would the pattern change with Vader????

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  273. Somehow I think they'll want to go WAY ahead ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Lucas stated that he wanted the characters from IV-VI to age.

    I personally think that episodes 7-9 will take place when Luke is aged and the Jedi order is largely rebuilt. It will deal with another "new threat" from the Sith and the ultimate victory will be STOPPING them from taking over and wiping them out for good by finally "balancing the force".

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  274. Animated storyboard leaked! by Purifier · · Score: 1
  275. Other problems .... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Zahn went on in great detail about how the sudden exposure to the force drove the clones mad. Well, I think all that was shot out of the water in episode 2. The cloners have a high reputation of putting out good product. And Lucas has made sure to let us know that the clone troopers will become Storm Troopers.

    Anyway, Lucas had previously said he wanted his actors "aged" for episodes 7-9. I personally feel that Luke will be an old man playing the role of Yoda et al in episode 7. New Jedi will be the protagonists along with a new generation of Sith.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Other problems .... by dazilla · · Score: 1

      You have to consider that in the Thrawn Trilogy, they were using an imperfect cloning method, not nearly as refined as the Kamino cloners'. If he wants his actors aged, I guess he could use some of the NJO, but that has much less of a Star Wars feel. I guess the X-Wing series would be good too, as they cover the taking-over of many important areas. However, those books don't focus on the main character (which I guess COULD be a good thing).

    2. Re:Other problems .... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Yes but ...

      They said the clones from the Clone War era were going mad. Not the clones that they were making in 'Heir to the Empire'.

      My understanding is that Boba/Jango Fett was strong in the force but simply untrained. This is what made them such ideal candidates for the Emperor's cloning method. He could jump into their minds more easily.

      Thats why the army that will be defeated is the droid army. Sidious cannot bend a droid army to his will in exclusion to anyone else. THAT is what the war is all about. Creating HIS ARMY and using it to destroy both the business classes and warrior/priestly classes that would oppose his ascension to power.

      Think about it, Droid armies are cheaper to produce than Clone Troopers. Droid fighters are cheaper to produce than Clone Pilots. But Droids can be taken over by clever technicians. The force sensitive clones can only be controlled by a master of the force.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  276. Billiance borrows ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    ... genious steals!!!!

    There is no such thing as "original music". We all stand on the shoulders of giants (or dwarfs in some cases).

    In any case, Williams is the most prolific living composer. His music is amazing and he'll be known as the Mozart of his time.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  277. Dark Force Rising ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    I think this is where the "balance" thing comes from.

    The Jedi train as many as the can while the Sith train only one. They concentrate the power of the darkside and make it more potent.

    I don't think that Anikan brings balance to the force by destroying Sidious. I think Qui-Gon was wrong, it's either Luke or his progeny that will bring the balance by learning how to channel the darkside safely.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  278. Re:You're fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the first rule about Fight Club?

  279. No, no, all the roles will be played by... by AnotherScratchMonkey · · Score: 1

    Eddie Murphy!

  280. Re:OK people, let's just get out all the permutati by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    Jesus fucking christ that was annoying.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  281. Money??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. I've read a few of the comments posted so far and I'm disappointed that everyone is so down on Episodes I and II. I must be among the VERY FEW that actually liked them BOTH! Remember the prequels need to flow SMOOTHLY into the exisitng trilogy! Lucas can not simply re-write the story to make you all happy!

    2. Most of you (at a guess) first saw the first trilogy 20 years or so ago, right!? Well, back then Star Wars was technically amazing for its time. But now, the new Stars Wars, well it's not easy to "impress" us anymore... LTOR was/is technically great, but people EXPECT that these days! So, I believe that the most people are unhappy with the first 2 episodes because it is now missing that "wow" factor which people got from the original 20 years ago!

    3. Making 3 more movies for money? That might be true, but try to remember a few things:
    a. You don't need to watch them!
    b. He will (most likely) be spending his own money to make HIS movies!
    c. You don't need to watch them!

    MV.

  282. A star wars band of brothers? SIGN ME UP by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    I think the box office would explode if that really happened.

    Follow a band of rebels as they fight against the remaining entrenched imperial troops.

    The gritty of Band of Brothers, the action humor of Indiana Jones and the WOW of Star Wars. Oh yeah that could work.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  283. So? Stealing is good, tolkien stole as well by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    I am pretty sure that Tolkien was not the first to come up with idea of elephants in battle to be used as big bow platforms. Check out something we call, "WORLD HISTORY", you will be suprising how many ideas writers have stolen from it.

    There are no orginal ideas left, the only thing left is to steal. It isn't being original that matters anyway. It is how well you tell it. Kinda like sex. Orginallity doesn't count. Skill does.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  284. Total Movies by netux · · Score: 1

    Time for some OLD trivia, from a question asked on the Nickelodion gameshow Double Dare. "Which are the only two characters that will be in all 7 Star Wars Movies?" Ans: R2D2 and C3P0 So yes there has always been an expectation of 7 movise, just long lost trivia.

  285. Sequels because Prequels sucked ? by tarkin · · Score: 1

    Let's all just hope that he changed his mind because he realised that he screwed up the *story* for the prequels and thus made a completely redundant Ep1 and more or less redundant Ep2 in the SW universe.

    Let's hope he enlists the help of Coppola or Spielberg or somebody else direct the sequels so we can all forget the prequels soon.

    Or better yet, Lucas should just talk to Kevin Smith to help write and direct the sequels.

    At least that way a lot of virgin fanboys in their 30's can finally experience the equivalent of non-self-inflicted orgasm(s)

    --
    blaah !
  286. Re:The Hidden Fortress-ripped off music. by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    All Western music is 'ripped off' in that it's all intrinsically based on a set of 12 notes.

    However, it is the way these notes are permuted and increased/decreased in pitch that makes music what it is.

    Music composing is a lot like writing....

    One takes the notes/letters and string them into motives/words. Put a few motives/words together in a noteworthy way and get a leitmotif/phrase. Mix all this stuff up in an interesting way and you can get a complete, extraordinary music score for a set of scenes in a movie like Adventures On Earth from
    E. T. The Extra-Terrestrial (1982) by John Towner Williams (1932 -- ) which I am listening to as I type this.

    On a related note, If Episodes 7-9 are made, they'll have to shoot them like Peter Jackson's LOTR trilogy if there is the remote(?) chance that Williams will still be alive to score them as he has the past 5(soon to be 6?) STAR WARS films. I've heard it said that 'Williams is a hack, etc, etc'. If that is the case, why is he (still?) the most sought after film music composer on the face of this earth? Added to that, look at the longevity of his first *GREAT* (most popular at the time) melody: the sharkmotif from Jaws (1975). Used in three sequels (1978, 1983, 1987), it is still in use today as it is used in (the trailer for) Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid (2004)

    Should he 'pass on', perhaps the producers will give Jason Graves a chance to 'finish up' as he can and has composed in the Williams style with his Sinister March

  287. Hardware Wars by huckamania · · Score: 1

    Someone should make a sequel to that! DV: Oomfh magh desroy Basketball planet! PL: I can't understand what you're saying? 'Closet cases of the nerd kind' stands alone, however.

    1. Re:Hardware Wars by ebonkyre · · Score: 1

      They did release a "Special Edition" with CGI toasters to replace the real ones...

      --
      "Time is an abstract concept devised by carbon-based lifeforms to monitor their ongoing decay." - Thundercleese
  288. MODS: TROLL ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be taken in by this idiot--he has accounts under the names bonch and Overly Critical Guy. He has a history of astroturfing for Microsoft, bashing anything Open Source, using lies and half-truths to get modded up, karma whoring, and the usual trolling (under his bonch account, he got a troll posted to the front page of Slashdot).

    All you have to do to check the veracity of this is to look at the posting history of his two old personnae (linked above) and his current one to figure it out.

    Please do not mod this jerk up--every time you do the Slashdot S/N ratio goes down while bonch/Overly Critical Guy/rd_syringe just laughs at you.

    This has been a public service announcement

  289. It would be a hit if by sparkywonderchicken · · Score: 0

    It followed the adventures of Paris and Nicole as they romped through the new republic.

  290. lucas isn't goin in order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shouldn't he release 10, 11 , and 12 first??/!!!1

  291. Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    This is pretty damn funny:

    Chubby Jedi Parade!!!!

  292. Yoda says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luke, your grandfather, I am.