Slashdot Mirror


Batch-o-Moz: Firefox, Thunderbird, Suite Released

bluephone writes "Today Mozilla.org has unleashed a triple threat; Firefox 1.0PR, Thunderbird 0.8, and Mozilla Suite 1.7.3. Wow. Lots of news in all three fronts. so, for your release notes, sys-requirements, what's new, and download links, here you go. Firefox, Thunderbird, and Mozilla Suite. Enjoy."

766 comments

  1. your mission, should you choose to accept it ... by spiny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is to convert an I.E. / outlook user to Mozilla / Thunderbird today ...

    go on, you know it makes sense - if anything it'll make the internet faster without all the outlook generated spam flying around.

    --

    Fry: heh, Yakov Smirnoff said it
    Leela: No he didn't.
  2. /. no match for moznews by TintinX · · Score: 3, Informative

    Warning: mysql_pconnect(): Too many connections in /web/virtuals/mozillanews.org/db_config.inc.php3 on line 2 Database is not availiable

    1. Re:/. no match for moznews by bmj · · Score: 1

      You can get around it by just going to the Mozilla homepage. It seems to only be the news page that's hosed. I downloaded both apps just fine.

      --
      Whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must be silent. --Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:/. no match for moznews by gingerTabs · · Score: 1

      just hit refresh, worked for me

    3. Re:/. no match for moznews by bonniot · · Score: 1

      Use the pages on mozilla.org: Firefox, Thunderbird.

    4. Re:/. no match for moznews by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      They check to see where you are linking from and try to avoid the slashdotting. Just cut and paste the URL from the address box back into the address box and hit return. :-)

    5. Re:/. no match for moznews by Myen · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of bugzilla.mozilla.org. They don't allow /., and has a message to tell you so.

      Mozillanews.org (which isn't part of mozilla.org) is just plain slashdotted. Wish the person who did the article used the nyud.net:8090 mirroring thing...

    6. Re:/. no match for moznews by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

      That's what you get for running IIS! Oh, wait...

  3. Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by Gopal.V · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Now I can finally say "It's 1.0" :)

    Seriously it's a hard job convincing people that it's stable when the developers are still putting Zero Point releases , especially at work. 1.1 Sounds a LOT more stable than 9.0 ... to some people at least.

    Take back the Web ! ("Rediscover the web" sucks...)
    1. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by whatsup_will · · Score: 1

      and better yet, porn sites with rss feed will be happy that people can view porn faster

    2. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's not 1.0, it's 0.10 a.k.a. 1.0 Preview Release 1... 1.0 final will come in november 2004.

    3. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by falconed · · Score: 1
      Odd, when you click the link for the Firefox 1.0PR release notes, you get the release notes for 0.9. Anybody know the diff between .10 and .9?

      Noticed that Thunderbird now includes RSS Integration... yay! Now all I need is SynCE support...

      --
      USE='clever' emerge -u sig
    4. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by Oxy+the+moron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds a LOT more stable than 9.0 ... to some people at least.

      Errm.... I think you mean 0.9. :)

      In all seriousness, though, I always have the same problem when trying to convince friends/co-workers to go open source. For example, most of my co-workers wouldn't get within 50 feet of the Mono project until it hit 1.0. Then, as if by magic, they all started picking up and using it. Don't know what's so magical about "1.0+" but it's certainly there.

      Congrats, Firefox team!

      --

      Proudly supporting the Libertarian Party.

    5. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by Schwartzboy · · Score: 1

      1.1 Sounds a LOT more stable than 9.0
      ...if you read from right to left? (Yes, I know what you mean. I'm being an ass, but I agree with what you're trying to say. I expect to get several converts today who have been waiting for Firefox to "stabilize", actually. )

      Seriously, I was thrilled this morning when I loaded up my browser, still pointing to the Firefox home page because I've never bothered to change the defaults. Noticed the 4.5 MB Windows download instead of 4.7 or whatever 0.93 was, clicked it just to see what had caused the change. Loved seeing "1.0" in the file name, though since it's labeled as a "preview release" that may still deter some people. Other than the slight changes to a couple of the icons and the "Subscribe to RSS feed" button in the bottom right-hand corner of the window, though, I'm not noticing a lot of differences.

      I have to say, though, the RSS icon is much nicer than the "hey, download a newer version of the browser! It's the SAME FRIGGIN' VERSION you're running now" icon that hasn't gone away since I installed 0.91 or something.

      --
      "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
    6. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by _undan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it'd be nice if they weren't still officially in point releases, but at least they're being honest and making sure that when they finally hit 1.0 Final, it won't be full of show-stopping bugs.

      I'd rather them hold off and release a product that I can give to clients knowing that it's not going to crash and take their bookmarks with them.

    7. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by Yolegoman · · Score: 1

      Same here. Yet, 1.0 PR, imo, is not the magical 1.0. I'll still wait for the "real" release before pimping FireFox.

    8. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by Bohnanza · · Score: 1
      Don't know what's so magical about "1.0+"

      Maybe the fact that it's the actual release version and not a beta test version?

      --

      -----

      Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.

    9. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck? No wonder Firefox sucks so much.

    10. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      0.10 - 0.9 = - 0.8

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    11. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by p4ul13 · · Score: 1
      the difference is .8

      =)

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    12. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by MvD_Moscow · · Score: 1
      If you want SunCE support in Thunderbird, you have to file a bug in bugzilla. There is no other way! What's the chance that the TB devs will see your posts? File the damn thing and the Devs will find out about your wish.

      http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ (copy and paste into address bar)

    13. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by ThatDamnMurphyGuy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the RSS support has a quirk or two in the mix, especially when it comes to viewing the content of each RSS item. I've abandon RSS in Thunderbird already due to it.

      When viewing email, it's safest to choose View ->
      Message Body As -> Plain Text. This keeps viewing unknown emails rather safe sans/HTML/image bugs/cookies.

      Unfortunately, this setting is not account specific, it's global. So now, my RSS feeds show nothing in the preview window unless I switch back to View -> Message Body As -> Simple HTML

      Bummer.

    14. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      How about the fact that its just a version number? At our office we refuse to use 1.0 versions of almost anything because they're just beta versions that needed to get out the door.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    15. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by cjellibebi · · Score: 1
      >Odd, when you click the link for the Firefox 1.0PR release notes, you get the release notes for 0.9. Anybody know the diff between .10 and .9?

      You can find the release notes for Firefox 0.10 (aka 1.0PR AKA "Greenlane") here - http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/releases/0 .10.html. The MozillaNews link got the wrong page for the release notes, but thankfully, the Firefox Homepage gets the right link.

    16. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Don't know what's so magical about "1.0+" but it's certainly there.

      Dunno. I generally won't *touch* a 1.0 release unless I know it's been through
      at least a year's worth of 0.x releases first. (For example, I had no qualms
      about Mozilla 1.0.) Frankly, I'm usually suspicious of anything .0, whether
      it's 1.0 or 12.0 -- I usually hold out for the .2 release. For example, I
      went from Mandrake 8.2 to 9.2 and am not touching 10.x until 10.2 comes out.
      This isn't a new trend either; DOS 5.0 and 6.0 both had serious bugs.

      Some OSS projects buck this trend, doing conservative development and bug
      fixing on the old tree for a while before promoting it to the next X.0.
      Mozilla tends to work that way. But in general, anything.0 is anathematic.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    17. Re:Firefox 1.0 - Yay !! by bob65 · · Score: 1
      Don't know what's so magical about "1.0+" but it's certainly there.

      For some applications, 1.0 signals a sort of "backward-compatibility freeze". In other words, anything after 1.0 strives to be compatible with 1.0, while that may not be true for 1.0. Also, there is usually a longer than usual feature freeze some while before 1.0 (usually 9.0 or so), so that *may* help make 1.0 more stable. I don't know how mozilla development works though.

  4. Killed already? by intheory · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not Found
    The requested URL /pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/0.10/Firefox Setup 1.0PR.exe was not found on this server. Apache/2.0.49 (Gentoo/Linux) Server at ftp.mozilla.org Port 80

    Anyone got a torrent up?

    1. Re:Killed already? by Ianoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mozilla.org is running Gentoo?

    2. Re:Killed already? by Myen · · Score: 1

      You're hitting one of the mirrors that don't have the file yet. Try again from the ftp.mozilla.org URL.

      (ftp.mozilla.org maps to a bunch of mirror sites, DNS.)

    3. Re:Killed already? by dstutz · · Score: 1

      you got a problem with that? ;)

    4. Re:Killed already? by bucklesl · · Score: 1
      Mozilla.org is running Gentoo?
      # curl -I http://www.mozilla.org
      Server: Apache/1.3.27 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) PHP/4.1.2

      # curl -I http://ftp.mozilla.org
      Server: Apache/2.0.49 (Gentoo/Linux)
      --
      help fill in hidden movie endings @ End of the Credits
    5. Re:Killed already? by aonaran · · Score: 2, Informative
    6. Re:Killed already? by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      No, I use Gentoo myself, I was just surprised to see it in a "production server" setting.

    7. Re:Killed already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually ftp.mozilla.org isn't a mozilla.org server - the name points to a bunch of mirrors. The different mirrors run on different systems. It's the one at indiana.edu that's running Gentoo.

    8. Re:Killed already? by aonaran · · Score: 1
  5. Holy Shiat by pHatidic · · Score: 0
    Firefox 1.0PR, Thunderbird 0.8, and Mozilla Suite 1.7.3

    I feel like there should be some obvious joke about hand lotion to be come up with here but I just can't quite grasp it. Someone give me a hand here.

    1. Re:Holy Shiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Firefox 1.0PR, Thunderbird 0.8, and Mozilla Suite 1.7.3 are in a bar and they look over and see Jesus.

      So they all buy him a pint and send it over.

      Jesus drinks the three pints and then comes over.

      He says thank you to Firefox 1.0PR, who then improves to Firefox 1.0

      He says thank you to Thunderbird 0.8, who then improves to Thunderbird 0.9

      He says thank you to Mozilla Suite 1.7.3, who then disappears.

    2. Re:Holy Shiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You talk about a joke involving hand lotion and someone giving you a hand? Surely you must be jesting...

    3. Re:Holy Shiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU ARE DENSE.

  6. take part in the initiative to spread the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:take part in the initiative to spread the news by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      Funny that, the second link kills Konqueror 3.2 flat every time.

    2. Re:take part in the initiative to spread the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather join the society to stop the demeaning of the word "rape" personally.

    3. Re:take part in the initiative to spread the news by SimplexO · · Score: 1

      and the newly acquired

      http://www.firefox.com/

      and

      http://firefox.com/ (redirect to http://spreadfirefox.com/)

    4. Re:take part in the initiative to spread the news by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      Funny yes. Works just fine for me.

      Konq v. 3.2.0 on MDK 10.0

      It's probably something with your particular setup, not anything in Konqueror. It is quality software: perhaps not as nice as FireFox, but still good.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    5. Re:take part in the initiative to spread the news by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      Oh, I like Konq, I use it exclusively. I was going to check if it worked on Konq 3.3 before filing a bug report.

  7. Installed easily enough by cs02rm0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It said my adblock version was out of date, asked if I wanted it to go and update it for me... yes please :)

    WebDeveloper toolbar seems fine.

    1. Re:Installed easily enough by cs02rm0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No sign of the slashcode rendering bug either.

    2. Re:Installed easily enough by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Hmm, this works for you? I don't know what I'm doing wrong, but Firefox auto-update has never worked for me in any capacity. For instance I've tried going somewhere with Flash content, and it just tells me that no suitable plugins were found. What's up with that?

    3. Re:Installed easily enough by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Im getting it here. Same as all previous versions.

  8. not upgrading firefox yet... by acroyear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    more than half of my extensions, even if they really are compatible with firefox 1.0, still say they're only good for 0.9.x+, not 0.9+, which means that firefox 1.0 won't install and use them.

    biggest pain in the ass -- firefox won't let the user override an extension's compatibility setting.

    I can only hope they all change their settings soon...

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
    1. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by urmensch · · Score: 1

      Maybe they will upgrade compatibility when firefox goes 1.0 final

    2. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by igrp · · Score: 4, Informative
      I am experiencing the same problem. You might find the Show Old Extensions plugin helpful (homepage is down, link goes to a mirror). It allows you to access old extensions' options dialogues, and to manually enable/disable them.

      HTH.

    3. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by TintinX · · Score: 1

      Have to admit...

      All-In-One-Gestures now disabled
      ChromEdit now disabled
      IEView now disabled (but hopefully needed less anyway)

    4. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by almostmanda · · Score: 1

      Yeah, isn't it kinda the point of a pre-release to fix little stuff like this?

    5. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      about:config

      Type extension in the filter and change extensions.disabledObsolete to false.

    6. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by almostmanda · · Score: 1

      Many of mine upgraded by themselves. I hunted around and found compatible versions on update.mozilla.org for some that didn't update manually. Still looking for Googlebar and BugMeNot.

    7. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      fuck !!!!!

      my all in one gestures is broken. WTF ?!!

      update this shit already.. maybe I should go back to 0.9.x

    8. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by sharkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not yet on the Mozilla FTP server, but you can get it from here. Just installed it with 1.0PR.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    9. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by ShadeARG · · Score: 3, Informative

      The about:config setting extensions.disabledObsolete seems to default to true. Try setting this to false instead.

    10. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This doesn't help

    11. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by almostmanda · · Score: 1

      hooray! my hero!

    12. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by acroyear · · Score: 1

      after upgrading, only 2 of mine are still dead: "Down Them All!" (creates a dialog that allows one to set filters and download any and all links, like if you were looking at a page of thumbnails or mp3 links and wanted them all), and "ieview".

      i'll live, though I hope downthemall gets fixed soon...

      --
      "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
      -- Joe
    13. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by Denyer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Setting "app.extensions.version" to something like 0.9 works for the rest [where Firefox functionality hasn't changed which would normally break the extension, of course.] =)

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    14. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of show-stopper bugs here.

      Ctrl-N doesn't work. A lot of menu items doesn't work.
      Some of my old setting doesn't work (middle-click tab to close)
      etc..

      The most buggy firefox yet. Wow.

      This is not a troll, if it works for you, good for you.

    15. Re:not upgrading firefox yet... by mlmll · · Score: 1

      Another useful link "Updating extensions, using old ones on new builds" HTH, too (it did for me :)

  9. still the same name ?? by phreakv6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always thought the names were gonna change as usual when firefox reached the 1.0pre release.. something like firewolf or fire-extinguisher :))

    --
    fifteen jugglers, five believers
    1. Re:still the same name ?? by MyHair · · Score: 0

      It will be changed to Wolf's Rain.

    2. Re:still the same name ?? by AtrN · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmmm, firewolf.... I like it. Over the last couple of months I've taken to calling the whole Mozilla soup as Thunderfox.

    3. Re:still the same name ?? by mute47 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mine happens to be called Mozilla Spacebird right now... Just install Firesomething and get it out of your system :D

      --
      Don't mind me, I'm just carping the diem...
    4. Re:still the same name ?? by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      Since they're all animals why not Mozilla Zoo (as compared with Mozilla Suite)?

      --
      Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
    5. Re:still the same name ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: Thundercougarfalconbird.

    6. Re:still the same name ?? by ChoyLeeFut · · Score: 1
      I always thought the names were gonna change as usual when firefox reached the 1.0pre release.. something like firewolf or fire-extinguisher

      How about WolfFox? Or WolfExtinguisher?

      Firezilla...?

      MoFo......?

      --

      The postman hits! The postman hits! You have mail.

    7. Re:still the same name ?? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      I'm running "Mozilla Moondog" right now. Actually that's a pretty cool name, much better than yesterday's "Wateremu".

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    8. Re:still the same name ?? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      I installed Firesomething at home, set all the modifiers to words like
      "Fire", "Fear", "Death", "Pain", and so on, and set all the noun words to
      weapons and stuff. So now I browse with things like FearBlayde, QuickKnife,
      PowerLance, BrazenAxe, DeathCannon, PainHalberd, LightningSword, ...

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  10. Some themes are still uncompatible? by jsveiga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All the themes I was using with 0.9.3 (on WinXP) are not compatible with 1.0PR, and that includes the neat Noia 2.0.

    I wonder if it's really a compatibility problem, or a bug.

    1. Re:Some themes are still uncompatible? by Oncogene · · Score: 1

      I'm using Noia 2.0 right now (on Firefox 1.0).

      --

      - - - - - - -
      "All hail the glory of the Hypnotoad."
    2. Re:Some themes are still uncompatible? by jsveiga · · Score: 1

      Oops. Too early.

      After uninstalling/reinstalling Noia for the 4th time, it finally loaded.

      strange...

    3. Re:Some themes are still uncompatible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't even get the Noia theme to install in 0.9.3 (Linux).

    4. Re:Some themes are still uncompatible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad that theming FF is one of the first things we do after installation. The default theme has got to be one of the silliest, immature, novice-y themes I've ever seen on a browser. FF is such a great browser it's a shame that it looks awful in its default config....

    5. Re:Some themes are still uncompatible? by mph · · Score: 1

      That's unpossible!

  11. Focus problems with Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Love Firefox, but I wish they'd fix the bugs.

    I am still stuck at Firefox 0.8 under Linux with Enlightenment due to serious focus problems with the recent releases.. And I do not want to be left behind!

    I open everything in new windows and usually close them using the keyboard. That does not work if the focus is wrong, etc. Mouse-centric folk won't notice this much but it is a killer for me.

    I think this is the bug and it looks like it is being ignored:

    252178

    1. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by dema · · Score: 1

      Hah, that links to the oh so kind message...

      Sorry, links to Bugzilla from Slashdot are disabled.

      There's one way to avoid being slashdotted (:

    2. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I've noticed serious keyboard focus problems myself. For me, it mostly comes into play when there is more than one tab open. The focus will be in a different tab than the one I want. One workaround is to focus on the location bar (Alt+D or Ctrl+L) before trying to close the current tab. That usually resolves the problem for me.

    3. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by Gollum · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like a window manager problem to me. If your window manager does not give focus to the windows in the order that you like, configure it to, or choose a different one that does.

      That's why there are so many window managers ;-)

    4. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by Val314 · · Score: 1

      if this is important to you, set the Flag
      blocking-aviary1.0 to "?" (not "+") in Bugzilla.

      if its important enough to the devs they may grant the blocking and it'll get fixed for 1.0 final

    5. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 4, Informative

      The focus problems are partly mandated by the javascript standards :-(

      Basically, javascript assumes you always use windows-style focus and completely ignores the existence of focus-under-mouse (what I use in Windows too, by the way. tweakui can do this).

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    6. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They check the referer-header, so either install an extension or proxy that fakes it apropriately or use cut-and-paste.

    7. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are so many window managers to show that they are _not_ the cause of this problem. Focus handling is broken in Gecko, not in Firefox or Mozilla, and of course not all window managers. I have this problem with afterstep (fvwm clone), 4DWm, CDE (both MWM descendants) and twm. An obvious sign of the browser at fault is if you just start typing and another browser window updates its status bar to "type ahead find stopped".

    8. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your window manager does not give focus to the windows in the order that you like, configure it to, or choose a different one that does.

      You must have missed the part about focus being pretty decent (though not perfect) in 0.8 but being terrible in subsequent releases.

      In fact, you sound like an Enlightenment basher who did not even look at the cited bug.

    9. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      tweakui can do this

      It does it poorly, IMO. I use the XP tweakui focus-follows-mouse setting at work, and it has problems giving focus to application dialogue boxes. (explicitly needing the user to mouse over the dialogue box) Annoying.

    10. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Does turning on "prevent focus stealing" help?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    11. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by Malc · · Score: 1

      More annoying are apps like Visual Studio .Net and the MSDN library. Moving the mouse over them pops them to the foreground. I've given up on the X-Mouse because of this.

    12. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by omicronish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I open everything in new windows and usually close them using the keyboard. That does not work if the focus is wrong, etc. Mouse-centric folk won't notice this much but it is a killer for me.

      Believe it or not, the focus problems became annoying enough that I've switched back to IE. Yes, they are that annoying. And no, it doesn't matter if it doesn't happen to you; the fact is, when I use Firefox, I spend a lot of time doing unnecessary clicks on the pages in Firefox to ensure the focus is in the right place. It was bad enough with a mouse, but 10 times worse on my laptop with its touchpad.

      For now I'll run IE with a proxy to block ads (gotta have adblock-equivalent functionality). I don't run with administrator privileges on Windows, and I've secured file system permissions fairly well, so hopefully spyware will have a difficult time entering my computer.

      This isn't saying I'm permanently turning away from Firefox; if they would fix those keyboard problems and others I'd be glad to switch back. But in its current state, I respectfully refuse.

    13. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      More annoying are apps like Visual Studio .Net and the MSDN library. Moving the mouse over them pops them to the foreground

      Photoshop also does this under certain conditions, and it is incredibly annoying. I'm not really surprised though -- their X-mouse is as broken as their virtual desktop support, leading inexperienced users to believe the concept is flawed, when in reality it's simply a flawed implementation.

    14. Re:Focus problems with Firefox by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > focus problems are partly mandated by the javascript standards

      A page's Javascript should only even be active when that tab is selected. It
      *certainly* shouldn't be able to steal focus away from another tab.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  12. Remember by GarfBond · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is only the Firefox 1.0 Preview Release. It isn't the final 1.0 by any means, though it should be feature complete. It's certainly the most polished one I've seen; I've been using nightlies for a little while now and they've been great so far.

    There's also a new community marketing effort at SpreadFirefox.com, and one of their first goals is 1 million downloads in 10 days. Come on Slashdot, spread the word, we can do it!

    1. Re:Remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Preview Release"?

      Oh joy.

      Not content with the confusion created by "Release Candidates", now those fine people at mozilla.org bring you a new refinement to the already-exquisite torture of "trying to work out which version is meant to be an actual release".

      For fsck's sake, you people, this isn't all that hard. Is it good enough to be a Release? Yes? Then make it a sodding release! No? Then don't call it "1.0"! Don't know? Assume "No". But for the love of Kylie, stop this insane, market-losing blathering about.

      This has been a public-service rant. Thank you.

    2. Re:Remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It isn't the final 1.0 by any means, though it should be feature complete.

      They said the same thing about 0.9, and that turned out to be wrong.

  13. Spread Firefox by listening+to+triplej · · Score: 5, Informative

    In addition to the release of new versions of Firefox, Thunderbird, and Mozilla suite, the Mozilla Foundation have launched a new marketing campign titled Spread Firefox.

    The goal is to see 1,000,000 downloads achieved in the first 10 days!

    Get downloading Slashdot.

    1. Re:Spread Firefox by value_added · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you ask me, the number of downloads would explode if someone wrote a Firefox extension to correct for Slashdot's new IT colour-scheme.

      Ok, so you didn't. But if you did ...

    2. Re:Spread Firefox by oojah · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ok, so you were being funny, but view slashdot in light mode and you won't get any nasty colour schemes or other cruft.

      I wouldn't have it any other way.

      Cheers,

      Roger

      --
      Do you have any better hostages?
    3. Re:Spread Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You need:

      Defuglify Slashdot

    4. Re:Spread Firefox by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      It is incredible how high the ration between the number of complaints about the new color schemes and how much the slashdot editors care about this...

      I bet they will invent something like "protect your eyes, subscribe today, new improved color schemes for subscribers only".

      To tell the truth, I was using the other days an old computer, 800x600 at 60Hz and the it color scheme made more sense. Perhaps this is what CmdrTaco is using...

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    5. Re:Spread Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, how do you look at any computer monitor at 60hz without noticing the blinding flickering?

    6. Re:Spread Firefox by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      i get a lot of pain killers pills for the headache and I'm fine ;)

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    7. Re:Spread Firefox by brokenvoice · · Score: 1

      Don't forget their other campaign: Ignore Camino.

    8. Re:Spread Firefox by value_added · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he has brown desktop wallpaper?

      Your comment about the number of complaints about the colour scheme being inversely proportional to the expressed interest of slashdot editors could simply be due to the distinct possibility that they all wear yellow-tinted glasses. My opthamlogist told me that aside from the Way Kewl factor, they're excellent for reducing glare. Maybe they work as well on us complaining trolls. ;-)

    9. Re:Spread Firefox by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Which is the only way to go if you occasionally read /. from your PDA. I turned it on for that reason, and kept it because /. stopped annoying me with horrid color schemes.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:Spread Firefox by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      I would be happy if they could just render slashdot like it is rendered in Konqueror and IE!
      I've always hated the Netscape look of slashdot, and can't for the world understand how they have overlooked that font bug this long.

    11. Re:Spread Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not hard to do. You just need to add the correct information into userContent.css and you can affect the style yourself. They also added a new -moz- style that will allow you to style pages on a specific url without affecting other sites (That's new for 0.10 I believe)

    12. Re:Spread Firefox by ricotest · · Score: 1

      Wow, unreable light mode where you get bold headings and plain posts with virtually no spacing inbetween. And you lose the (fairly good) main page styles and (variably good) subpage styles completely.

      Some of us want an IT section that looks like it wasn't picked by a florist, but don't want to lose ALL of the styles across the entire site.

      Would be sure neat if Slashdot editors either actually listened to these comments, or made a poll to settle it once and for all.

    13. Re:Spread Firefox by legirons · · Score: 1

      "If you ask me, the number of downloads would explode if someone wrote a Firefox extension to correct for Slashdot's new IT colour-scheme."

      As if that hadn't already happened...

    14. Re:Spread Firefox by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > if someone wrote a Firefox extension to correct for Slashdot's new IT
      > colour-scheme

      1. Install the thEmacs GTK theme.
      2. In Firefox, open the prefs, click the "Fonts and Colors" button.
      3. Check "Use system colors" and Select "always use my colors". Hit Ok.
      4. ???
      5. No more unpleasant color schemes, on *any* site.

      I haven't browsed with page colors enabled since I gave up Navigator 4.08.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    15. Re:Spread Firefox by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      ##############
      # This is a Privoxy filter. Add it to your filters file.
      # slashdot-dethemer: Restore soothing green light.
      # The one with the # sign removes JUST the IT scheme
      # while the one without it removes all theming.
      # Switch the # to switch filters.
      ##############
      FILTER: slashdot-dethemer Remove themes.
      #s|//it\.slashdot\.org|//slashdot.org|ig
      s|//[a-z]+\.slashdot\.org|//slashdot.org|ig

      --
      Not a sentence!
    16. Re:Spread Firefox by oojah · · Score: 1

      What can I say, I like the way it works for me. I've had it that way since I got my account.

      More customisability would definitely be a plus though.

      Cheers,

      Roger

      --
      Do you have any better hostages?
    17. Re:Spread Firefox by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      I thought someone had created an extension for Firefox that de-uglified the it.slashdot colourscheme.

      Don't ask me where it is though. Someone invariably posts it on any discussion at it.slashdot...

      I reckon that the developers got bored and did a bit of crack when they were tasked with coming up with that colour scheme... honestly...

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  14. Thank you Mozilla by adpe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thank you for making a wonderful browser. Thank you for gaining market share and thank you for stopping this non-standard-compilant IE madness. Image a world where all browsers have to follow Microsofts web standards to have all pages displayed correctly. One or two years ago, I thought exactly this would happen, but with Mozilla and Opera being such great products, websites are now W3C compilant with little IE tweaks. Thank you oh so very much.

    1. Re:Thank you Mozilla by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      [...] to have all pages displayed correctly.

      Except this one :(

  15. Nope, its version 0.10! by zyche · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The 1.0 final release won't be out for another month or so"

    "The version number for this release is 0.10PR. For those who still count in decimal, 0.10 is larger than 0.9, despite what you were taught in school."

    RTFA

    1. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by bint · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, i just downloaded it and the about box says "version 1.0 Preview Release" ... but now I can't RTFA due to /.. Curiously enough, the string at the bottom says "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Firefox/0.10"

    2. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm. To which FA do you refer? Everything I see (including the FireFox home page and FireFox's own "About" help) says it is "version 1.0 Preview Release".

      ITFB (Install the fucking browser).

    3. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem is, many people (myself included) read 0.9.1 as 0.91, which clearly IS higher than 0.10.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      In other news, there are 10 types of people in this world. Those who know binary, and those who don't. :)

    5. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old, but still dam funny.

    6. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by Khomar · · Score: 1

      Which is also, it seems, the reason why most of the extensions no longer work. They think 0.9 is larger than 0.10 too.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    7. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by MvD_Moscow · · Score: 3, Informative
      87 out of the 155 extensions on update.mozilla.org are compatible with Firefox PR. I wouldn't call that most. And that's just update.mozilla.org, they are dead slow on updating extensions. Use a mirror like:

      http://www.extensionsmirror.nl

      They have a lot of unofficial repacks which work great.Also check out this link: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=1052 22

      Hope that helped!

    8. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by Khomar · · Score: 1

      I'll check that out. Thanks!

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    9. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This really isn't curious at all, but it's a little confusing. The situation, as I understand it, is this:

      What we have here is a beta for Firefox 1.0. But the term "beta" isn't used, because Firefox has never used terms like "alpha" and "beta" in the past, and they were concerned that it would make it sound less complete, or less stable than it really is. Instead, they chose the official name to be 1.0 Preview Release.

      Now, for the purposes of identification for extension and theme compatibility it was given the internal version number 0.10. So Firefox 0.10 is Firefox 1.0PR, and is a beta for Firefox 1.0.

    10. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by Malc · · Score: 1

      Yes, it would help if they were consistent with the format of the version number and wrote it as something like 0.10.0. Then the relationshop with 0.9.3 is more apparent, or at least to us software developers.

    11. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by swatoa · · Score: 1

      Haha, you said relationshop

    12. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by entrigant · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a problem with your ability to read, and not a problem with the firefox version numbering scheme. +4 Informative wth *grumble*

    13. Re:Nope, its version 0.10! by Chemicalscum · · Score: 1
      Well I just downoaded:

      firefox-1.0PR-i686-linux-gtk2+xft-installer.tar.gz Destroy the American Empire save the World!

  16. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I did one this week-end.

    The guy (in his 50's) had dramatic pop-up and scumware problems. I pointed him to mozilla + adaware, thinking that, he would not care, because it is not IE.

    Boy I was wrong. He was over-enthusiast. He downloaded it as fast as possible, and now is not using ie anymore.

    I am really impressed, as it is the first time I convert someone over 30.

    Pop-up blocking, annoyance killing is *the* selling point of firefox. I didn't knew how fucked was ie browsing until I talked with this guy. The web was becoming useless for him, and he was driven crazy by frustration.

  17. Might this spell an end... by TintinX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... to the Slashdot rendering problems I have with 0.9?
    My poor F5 key is getting worn...

    Sadly, I think it's an Old Skool Slashdot issue. Will anyone ever drag my favorite site out of 1996 and introduce it to some lovely CSS-P?

    Yours, in hope...

    1. Re:Might this spell an end... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Informative

      So its YOU thats causing all the errors on slashdot doubling the server load!

      To fix the screen without redownloading, just increase, then decrease the font size (hold down [ctrl] + mouse wheel up then down).

      Its a PITA that there is a problem in the first place, but thats the way it is.

      btw, has anyone else noticed popups coming from slash (work machine is IE6 on xp sp1) Not even noticed it at home (firefox .9.1).

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Might this spell an end... by edremy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I have to admit I find it ironic that the premier "Open Source rules, MS drools!" site works perfectly in IE and needs 2-3 refreshes to even manage to render poorly in Firefox. Black on black text and margin errors and blank screens, oh my.

      There's nothing like being unable to read the latest IE bashing thread because Firefox can't render the /. page.

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    3. Re:Might this spell an end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's only because Slashdot is the most poorly coded piece of shit since.... well, Microsoft! :-)

    4. Re:Might this spell an end... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      .. to the Slashdot rendering problems I have with 0.9?

      You may be talking about this bug:
      http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id= 217527

      That one is unfortunately only fixed on the Firefox trunk. :-/ (which means it will come in a post-1.0 Firefox release, like Firefox 1.1 or so)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:Might this spell an end... by RPoet · · Score: 1

      You don't have to reload the page to fix the rendering. Just force a re-rendering by zooming out, then in again (ctrl+minus, ctrl+plus). Saves you bandwidth and is faster.

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    6. Re:Might this spell an end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone please explain this bug? I've been using firefox for many months on many platforms, and have never noticed any rendering problems on slashdot.

    7. Re:Might this spell an end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does this come from? I have never ever had any problems with firefox on slashdot - and I'm always here instead of working so I should know...

    8. Re:Might this spell an end... by fossa · · Score: 1

      Here ya go: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slashdot/. Now, if only slashdot would use it. Can you say "bandwidth savings"?

    9. Re:Might this spell an end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Using the new release now, still busted.

    10. Re:Might this spell an end... by thenextpresident · · Score: 3, Informative

      I find it funny that I have NEVER had this problem with Firefox. Never, not once. I honestly have no idea what people are referring to. /. has never rendered poorly via Firefox.

      --
      Jason Lotito
    11. Re:Might this spell an end... by Artega+VH · · Score: 1

      Seriously this has been covered multiple times in just about every firefox related story...

      Quickly increase and then decrease your text size.. (or decrease then increase)..

      So.. ctrl+, ctrl-.. or for mac users (like myself) Command+, Command- (i still think of it as "open apple" though).

      --
      groklaw, wired and slashdot. The holy trinity of work based time wasting.
    12. Re:Might this spell an end... by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      btw, has anyone else noticed popups coming from slash (work machine is IE6 on xp sp1) Not even noticed it at home (firefox .9.1).

      Yeah, I notice it at work, usually when submitting comments. Can't see them at home, of course, I'm using SP2.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    13. Re:Might this spell an end... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's sporadic to me. Viewing at school with arelease from much earlier in the year (too lazy to upgrade and whatnot on my account) I see no problems.

      However, using some of the newer Trunk builds (starting afew months ago) I began to see these rendering problems just as this thread of convos describes. Aviary builds don't seem to manifest this, or if they do, not nearly as often

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    14. Re:Might this spell an end... by worf_mo · · Score: 1

      Will anyone ever drag my favorite site out of 1996 and introduce it to some lovely CSS-P?

      Someone already did the hard work.

      Now try to convince your favourite site's editors to apply the necessary changes.

    15. Re:Might this spell an end... by JayJay.br · · Score: 1

      Actually, it has already been fixed on the 'trunk' (bug 217527 - not linked 'cause bugzilla doesn't like it), but it has not yet made it to the release.

      For more info, take a look at The Burning Edge's Bigger Picture

    16. Re:Might this spell an end... by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      I use firefox 0.9 and I have these problems (once per day at least.)

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    17. Re:Might this spell an end... by KjetilK · · Score: 1
      Eh, I guess it is me causing the doubled server load... ;-)

      But seriously, Slashdot should fix their broken HTML, it is just incredibly lame. Browser writers shouldn't have to spend time on debugging other people's broken pages, I'm pretty sure this hadn't happened if Slashdot had been valid XHTML+CSS.

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    18. Re:Might this spell an end... by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'd never even heard of this problem until now.

    19. Re:Might this spell an end... by Mant · · Score: 1

      works perfectly in IE and needs 2-3 refreshes to even manage to render poorly in Firefox. Black on black text and margin errors and blank screens, oh my.

      That sounds like something of an exageration to me. I browse /. in Firefox all the time, it sometimes needs one refresh to be fine. I've seen a few others complain about the margin errors, but never the other stuff.

    20. Re:Might this spell an end... by The+Mgt · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to another comment I've just read it's caused by inline iframes in some of the ads, so perhaps if you're blocking the ads you won't see the problem.

    21. Re:Might this spell an end... by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      Whatta it Firefox isn't any better? Bummer.. Pisses me off too that Mozilla sometimes draws slash article texts at 100% width. Oh well.. At least the load times for the browser will be smaller.

      --
      Store with salt
    22. Re:Might this spell an end... by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my slashdot browsing experience to me.

      In the 1.0 pr now and it still has the same problem. Sometimes one refresh fixes it, sometimes it takes 2 or 3, but now I'll try the text size thing.

      I attribute it to having the browser sized down in the corner of my screen about 600 px wide. Still, pretty lame that it happens about every other thread I open up in a new tab.

    23. Re:Might this spell an end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't help that Slashdot's HTML is a pile of invalid shit, and that tables are used for its layout. But that will never change.

      I always find it funny that the site that bitches and moans about standards refuses to adhere to them when it suits their interests. In this case, complete laziness and apathy.

    24. Re:Might this spell an end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I block all ads and still get the problem a -lot-. Technically, I may be missing the iframes, which I shall have to investigate some time.

    25. Re:Might this spell an end... by Nafai7 · · Score: 1

      0.9.2, same thing. I've never had it render /. wrong.

    26. Re:Might this spell an end... by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 1

      "...needs 2-3 refreshes to even manage to render poorly in Firefox. Black on black text and margin errors and blank screens..."

      Since, most of my time using FireFox until very recently was scanning slashdot - I wonder about where you are attributing blame is valid. I have seen none of those problems on either FF or an older version of Mozilla that I use routinely.

      However, I suspect the core difference is that I connect to the web from a Linux machine.

    27. Re:Might this spell an end... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Yes I've been getting popups from Slashdot.. at first I thought I got some spyware somehow.. IE 6 (work)

    28. Re:Might this spell an end... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      We go through this everytime we talk about bugs in programs. Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean the bug doesn't exist.

      Mods: It's not informative to say "I've never seen that bug!"

    29. Re:Might this spell an end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Never *ever* seen a render problem with firefox and slashdot. A few months of checking slashdot multiple times daily.

      Sounds like you have other computer issues.

    30. Re:Might this spell an end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      btw, has anyone else noticed popups coming from slash (work machine is IE6 on xp sp1) Not even noticed it at home (firefox .9.1).

      Probably just spyware. Run ad-aware, switch to Firefox.

    31. Re:Might this spell an end... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Silly AC, shut up!

      I'm very confident my system is clean tyvm.

      Its just a bloody popup advert.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    32. Re:Might this spell an end... by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1

      I'm on Opera (I've tried Firefox, but can't get used to it!) and very occasionally I get an error message popping up saying it couldn't connect to the advertising server. This is normally the square banner that is around the summary text - with it missing, this could be a source of rendering problems possibly?

    33. Re:Might this spell an end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mods: It's not informative to say "I've never seen that bug!"

      Yes it is. The fact that this bug doesn't occur for everyone suggests that there's something else influencing the bug, and therefore it is possible to eliminate the occurences of the bug even in existing releases. People who are not yet using Firefox, but are considering it, may be turned off by posts describing these bugs, but upon discovering that the bugs aren't guaranteed to occur, might still consider Firefox an option, and might also want to read further to find out whatever information they can in order to ascertain what the real problem is.

      Bottom line: The posts saying "Firefox has a bug" and the posts saying "I've never seen that bug" are informative.

    34. Re:Might this spell an end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using Firefox since 0.8 and have never seen this issue either (and browsing /. almost daily).

      I'd be curious to know if there wasn't some type of Xft/Freetype issue going on?

    35. Re:Might this spell an end... by omicronish · · Score: 1

      I find it funny that I have NEVER had this problem with Firefox. Never, not once. I honestly have no idea what people are referring to. /. has never rendered poorly via Firefox.

      Yeah, maybe you've never had this problem, but some people take it a step further and basically state that the problem doesn't exist because they've never seen it. I'm not saying that you're doing it, but to those that do, it's annoying. And yeah, I've had that problem before in Firefox. The funny thing is that I didn't see it for a while either, but it mysteriously developed one day and decided to stay.

  18. Firefox by ryg0r · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I work for Solutions First in Australia, and all we recommend to our customers for their spyware problems are FireFox and Spybot SD, and the little known TDS-3 for more serious issues.

    The mozilla suite have literaly changed the face of the internet for me. Not just pop up stoppers, or tabbed browsing, or it being free. It just cooler, something that IE won't have. How can MS compete with a name like Firefox? Or Thunderbird

    --
    Karma whoring .sigs don't work
    1. Re:Firefox by ryg0r · · Score: 0

      I hate replying to my own post, but the URL is http://solutionsfirst.com.au

      --
      Karma whoring .sigs don't work
    2. Re:Firefox by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm still waiting for user education to catch up. If I here one more person ask "Where did the Internet go?" when I remove the IE icon ...

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Firefox by legirons · · Score: 1

      "I'm still waiting for user education to catch up. If I here one more person ask "Where did the Internet go?" when I remove the IE icon ..."

      No need to remove the IE icon... nobody cares whether it's an e or whether it's a * or whether its a @, so long as it's what they recognise. (visual recognition being important for icons and all that).

      Some people might even install the IE-style toolbar and widgets, but then who would know that it was Mozilla?

    4. Re:Firefox by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > How can MS compete with a name like Firefox? Or Thunderbird

      If they wanted the "cool name" factor, their marketing department wouldn't
      have *any* trouble doing better than "Firefox" or "Thunderbird". However,
      MS doesn't really *want* that image. They're trying to be corporate and
      respectable and stuff, so "Explorer" is just about as wacky and out-there
      as they want to go with a product name. If anything, they'll probably
      rename it "Microsoft Internet" one of these releases.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  19. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather wait for 1.0.

  20. Finally... by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The one thing I was waiting for in Thunderbird. Putting all your POP3 accounts into one main folder.

    I couldn't believe they didn't have this feature earlier and when I switched over from Outlook Express I was severely disappointed that I had to look through two different folders for new mail.

    Hopefully they'll upgrade the spam filter as well... because as far as I can tell it doesn't work too great, or maybe I'm just stupid.

    1. Re:Finally... by whatsup_will · · Score: 2

      just stupid, as the program learns from the stupidy to input into it, if u are really stupid, it lets u read all of the spam

    2. Re:Finally... by oneiron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like the seperate folders for each pop3 account... I think it's good that they provide the option, though...

    3. Re:Finally... by shic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thunderbird spam filtering didn't meet my needs either - but SpamPal in combination with Thunderbird works fantastically. I'm using the service (Beta) Spampal build - I've had no problems so far.

    4. Re:Finally... by Tyrell+Hawthorne · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hopefully they'll upgrade the spam filter as well... because as far as I can tell it doesn't work too great, or maybe I'm just stupid.

      As I understand it, the Thunderbird spam filter is bayesian. This means that you have to teach it. To begin with it won't be very good, but as you mark your email as spam or non-spam it learns what both types look like. Given the right stimuli, this can work very well.
    5. Re:Finally... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I have been teaching it but on its own, it still isn't very good. The problem is that a lot of spam has been throwing in invalid tags into the middle of every word. A spam scanner should make a note of it then remove them before doing a scan. Keyword obfuscation (zero for O, etc) seems to render the scanner somewhat useless too.

      A custom filter reading only the subject line seems to be doing OK, far better than the built-in "learning" filter does.

    6. Re:Finally... by darien · · Score: 1

      I was severely disappointed that I had to look through two different folders for new mail.

      I was disappointed too, so I set up a filter to move all my mail into a central mailbox as it arrived. *shrug*

      But yeah, I agree with you on the spam filter - I've been using TB for 3+ months and it's still not as good as POPfile or SpamBayes were after a few weeks.

    7. Re:Finally... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      The problem is that if you want to filter after rules (sorting out mailinglists, ect), you cant apply such a filter to the "end"-folder, but only to the different incoming- folders. Which leads to much "which rule is where" confusion....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    8. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that a lot of spam has been throwing in invalid tags into the middle of every word. A spam scanner should make a note of it then remove them before doing a scan. Keyword obfuscation (zero for O, etc) seems to render the scanner somewhat useless too.

      All of these things make the mail easier to identify as spam. Removing them prior to classification would be a mistake. Check out some of Paul Graham's articles on Baysian spam filtering. He discusses the tricks that spammers use to get around filters, and how Baysian classification typically negates (or should negate) these efforts.

      I don't know what to tell you about Thunderbird's filtering. It works great for me.

    9. Re:Finally... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for Mozilla Mail to be more responsive to the mouse.

      Start with the focus on another pane/window. Click on a message to select it, immediately shift-click on a message 3 or 4 down to select multiple messages... wait 2 seconds while the UI catches up and watch it clear your selection.

      Worse, do the same thing and then mark multiple messages as junk. Watch it move all but one or two to the junk folder, or watch it move random messages to the junk folder.

      (This with 1Gb of RAM and a P4M 1.6GHz CPU... I'm *not* starved for power here...)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    10. Re:Finally... by Psychochild · · Score: 1

      One thing that really helped me is that you also have to mark your good messages as "Not Junk Mail". Highlight all the messages in a folder of known good mail, right click on any of them, select "Mark" > "As Not Junk". Once you do that, the spam filter becomes MUCH better.

      It's annoying that they don't explain this. The fact that there's a "junk" button but no "not junk" button is one of my biggest complaints about the UI. It doesn't let you know that you need to mark messages as not junk in order to really get the filter to work well.

      Hope this helps someone.

      Have fun,

      --
      Brian "Psychochild" Green
      MMO developer's blog
    11. Re:Finally... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Thunderbird spam filtering didn't meet my needs either

      Heck, Thunderbird's filtering doesn't meet my needs even for non-spam mail.
      But then, I use Gnus, so I don't think I'm really part of the target market
      for Thunderbird. That'd be like trying to sell a kayak as a replacement for
      a submarine, because it's leaner and meaner and easier to learn to operate
      and has "all the features most people really need".

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    12. Re:Finally... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > As I understand it, the Thunderbird spam filter is bayesian.

      Yes, that's right. I'm not sure whether it's completely naive, or whether
      it attempts to compensate for basic bayesian-filter-evasion techniques.

      > Given the right stimuli, this can work very well.

      It gets *way* too many false positives. Bayesian filters in general have
      this problem. You end up having to go looking through the spam filter to
      find the real messages that got there by mistake -- at which point, the
      filter is doing you no practical good at *all*. A filter that only catches
      half of the spam but never gets a false positive is in practice much better.

      I filter based on character set (it's a truism that anything I can't read
      isn't worth my time to look at to see if it's spam or not), which by itself
      filters out about a third of my spam. (Almost a quarter of the spam I get
      is GB2312 alone.) Then on top of that I run regular expression filters to
      remove certain other perpetual classes of spam (e.g., P@Xi1 and \/i@gra),
      plus filters to take out the easy-to-filter stuff (e.g. Columbus Streetmail,
      Hermess Newsletter, and anything else that comes several times a day and
      follows a reliable pattern). After all that is said and done, about 20%
      of my spam lands in my inbox, and I go through that 20% manually.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    13. Re:Finally... by shic · · Score: 1

      Hmmm - maybe - I use thunderbird for my 'occasional use' home machine - where the only real problem is spam (a noise which out-numbers signal 1000 to 1. Thunderbird folks make a big song and dance about the Bayesian filter - but in my experience it has been useless. Ideally I'd run a dedicated mail serve for home - but to be honest - I just can't be bothered. Spam-pal with thunderbird impressed me as it works pretty well with little or no configuration. This combination is something I'd feel confident to recommend anyone to try without expecting to be asked to hand-hold every step of the way.

  21. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Yolegoman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally, I wish to wait until FireFox has a standard 1.0 release before converting a user to it. Yes, you did say Mozilla, but I prefer FireFox.

    Even though FireFox @ 0.9 is better than IE @ 6.0, Service Pack 2, I've decided to wait until it has a stable, 1.0 release to "convert" users. Doesn't seem like I will have to wait that much longer. The only reason I do this is because there are a few bugs, imo, that are confusing, to say the least. I can work around them, but at least with my friends using IE, it's not my fault if something goes wrong.

    As for Mozilla Thunderbird... even though it isn't 1.0, I haven't had ANY problems with it. Converting my mom to that was simple enough. I just told her it didn't boot you offline like AOL. :)

    Seriously, AOL sux. My mom is really happy with Thunderbird. It downloads her email, she reads the email, the end. No calendars, headline news, advertisements, etc. It gets the job done, and quite efficiently.

    So: I accept the mission. But I won't carry it out... yet.

  22. Triple threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Should this not read "triple treat"?

    1. Re:Triple threat? by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      maybe it's just meant to be as a threat to M$ ,
      after all, mozilla's browser and mail client
      do work (and work securely), unlike the wannabe
      projects from M$.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    2. Re:Triple threat? by soda · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not necessarily. Microsoft should feel threatened by these releases.. :)

    3. Re:Triple threat? by digime · · Score: 1

      Both apply, but I think the author meant "Triple threat", as in this is a cage match with MS.

    4. Re:Triple threat? by Jaguar777 · · Score: 1

      Should this not read "triple treat"?

      triple threat

      A person who is adept in three areas, as in She's a triple threat on the editorial staffshe can edit, write, and design pages. This term comes from football, where it signifies a player who is good at running, passing, and kicking.

      --
      Maybe you should educate the morons of tomorrow so they'll stop believing the leaders of tomorrow. - Dogbert
  23. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by falconed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IE is no match for Firefox, but IMHO (and as much as I love it) Thunderbird still needs to catch up to Outlook. Outlook 2003 just has more features and a better interface. Major things I'm waiting on before switching to Thunderbird at work are integration with SynCE and the Novell Connector.

    --
    USE='clever' emerge -u sig
  24. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by atheken · · Score: 4, Informative

    These are generally the only two apps I need to suggest for PC users having problems. One other app that just makes people happy is PDFCreator (pdfcreator.sf.net) which adds a PDF printer to your system printer folder - great if you don't want to shell out $100 for acrobat.

  25. Firefox 1.1 by Ianoo · · Score: 1

    I hope they integrate the bookmark sorting extension into Firefox 1.1, since it doesn't appear to be in 1.0. I hate to be pedantic, but bookmark sorting really is useful and rather important for many people, and whilst I know Firefox goes with the attitude that as little as possible superfluous functionality should be included as possible and left to extensions, many users can't be bothered to install them, and besides, sorting bookmarks ranks up there with "Printing" for me.

    1. Re:Firefox 1.1 by Ianoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      COMMENT RETRACTED. There appears to be a "Sort by Name" option on the right click menu. Firefox is now the perfect browser!

    2. Re:Firefox 1.1 by magnetik79 · · Score: 1

      yeah I was dying for this option too! so very, very glad to see it now in this 1.0PR!

  26. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by evslin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a bench technician for a local ISP just outside of Omaha. 90% of my job is cleaning pron dialers/browser hijacks/etc off people's computers, mostly through Ad-Aware and AVG. Think as soon as Firefox goes to 1.0 I'll start throwing that in there too on the grounds (and rightly so) that it's more secure than Internet Explorer.

    Doing my part!

  27. Getting There by ewanrg · · Score: 5, Interesting
    When I got my new computer, our support staff was too "busy" to setup my system, and I've been using Firefox and Thunderbird ever since. Amazing how you can redefine policy if you're willing to do a bit of work yourself :-)

    However, two things that have kept me from making a greater push into converting folks have been Thunderbird's buggy LDAP support (our company email directory is LDAP) and the lack of a central calendar. Yes, I use the calendar add-on, and am aware of the stand-alone product, but until it can talk with our Exchange server, the conversion process will be painful. I was willing to do it because I prefer having the same system at work as at home (where I run Linux). Most folks here aren't going to be quite as motivated...

    Obligatory Plug - Please read my online novel

  28. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
    I honestly don't think I known any IE users anymore other than a person who runs a website and uses it intentionally to view the site in the "most common configuration". It'll be a bit longer before they can switch over.

    Parents, check. Friends, check. Heck, even my neighbors use Firefox.

    Hunh. It'll be interesting to watch the browser numbers. Most of the people I know are pretty internet savvy or know someone who is savvy. The rest (like my SO and roommate) run various *nix or OSX.

    --
    Evan "Konqueror for me, personally"

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  29. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by madfgurtbn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pop-up blocking, annoyance killing is *the* selling point of firefox.

    Be sure to show newbies how to use tabs and find-as-you-type! IE will soon be blocking popups.

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  30. Slashdot Bug Fixed? by KAMiKAZOW · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Has the Slashdot bug been fixed in the 1.7 branch?
    http://www.robert.to/mozilla/mozbug.html

    Currently I use a trunk nightly, because it's fixed there.

    1. Re:Slashdot Bug Fixed? by nologin · · Score: 2, Informative
      The problem appears only when they serve up some of those broken ads that use an inline iframe which completely screws up the layout of the page.

      It seems that Firefox doesn't render these iframes properly.

  31. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by isecore · · Score: 1

    Did this with my father. He's 55. Now he's preaching the FireFox-gospel to everyone he meets.

    No, he's not a techie/nerd/geek. He's just an average joe with a new cool thing.

    --
    I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
  32. Big thanks to the Firebird Team! by bbzzdd · · Score: 1

    I switched back and forth from Firefox to IE during the Pheonix/Fire(bird|fox) betas and I have to say there's zero incentive to use IE at this time. Firefox is just plain leaner and meaner. IE's lack of extensions is just the killer.

    Thanks to the Firebird team for keeping at it all this time. I will be the first to admit that I thought it was impossible to dethrone IE when Firebird was announced. Thanks for proving me wrong. Great work guys.

    1. Re:Big thanks to the Firebird Team! by kdark1701 · · Score: 1

      "IE's lack of extensions is just the killer." Whaqt are you talking about? IE has plenty of extensions. Xupiter, Comet Cursor are two excellent examples.

  33. md5sums? by jaxdahl · · Score: 0

    I did some poking around but can't find md5sums for the new versions -- anyone know where they are?

    1. Re:md5sums? by tsager · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are none... :-/

      Working on it: bug 159999

    2. Re:md5sums? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for the informative reply.

  34. Nope ... too late by JamesR2 · · Score: 1

    XP+SP2 is good enough compared to the pain of plugins and sites that still don't run right in anything but IE. Sorry.

    1. Re:Nope ... too late by syrinx · · Score: 1

      What sites are these? People keep saying this but I haven't encountered any site that "only works in IE" for years.

      (Plugins on Firefox still need work though... sometimes I have no problems, but occasionally it just messes up completely)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    2. Re:Nope ... too late by Tassach · · Score: 1

      Several of my credit cards require IE to pay the bill online. Even hacking the user-agent string doesn't work because they use some nasty jscript garbage that only works in IE.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    3. Re:Nope ... too late by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      What sites are these? People keep saying this but I haven't encountered any site that "only works in IE" for years.

      this one? (It's a link to download the Oxfam album in aid of Darfur; apparently only IE users may contribute).

      You're broadly right, though. This is pretty much the only site I've seen in at least a year that doesn't render in the mighty 'fox.

      (Incidentally, I mailed the site admin to tell them my woes, and was told "I am sorry that the service is not of use to you because Firefox is unfortunately not a compatible browser." So there you have it: Firefox isn't compatible! That's me told! Dang those standards-supporting Mozilla folk!)

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    4. Re:Nope ... too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.flipdog.com

      Now try changing your user string agent and see what happens to the site. Also view in IE for comparison.

    5. Re:Nope ... too late by Odd+John · · Score: 1

      The only page I've found that won't work in Firefox is www.hotmail.com. But it only dies because my Firefox options are set to disable javascript. When I turn javascript on hotmail runs fine in Firefox.

    6. Re:Nope ... too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the Microsoft DRM stuff fails to work without (Windows) ActiveX, annoyingly. So they just block you if you're not using IE on Windows.

    7. Re:Nope ... too late by kgbspy · · Score: 1

      www.allmusic.com - quite a popular site, too. There was an awful lot of angst amongst Firefox users when AMG redesigned their site (an extension was even developed by one user to neaten up the new, non-standards-compliant site), but as of a week or so ago it just plain doesn't work in Firefox.

      Still, not nearly enough to make me want to stop using FF.

      --
      ~
      ~
      ~
      -- INSERT --
    8. Re:Nope ... too late by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      Aye, I suspected something stupid like that. Daft logic - "if you use Firefox you must be planing to use Winamp". Daft. Still, their loss. It's just a pity "they" in this case is a charity (Oxfam) and a cause (Darfur) I support.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
  35. Firefox: Location filed - Enter does not work by Spoing · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is an odd bug...stumped me.

    Situation: If you type in an address in Firefox -- about:plugins, yahoo.com (with or without http:// and www.) -- and hit enter, nothing happens.

    That's right the *enter key* is ignored.

    Also happens for the search field.

    Details: Windows 98 system. RC1 and other recient 9.x releases. Firefox was removed and reinstalled multiple times to avoid this. Works fine on all other systems I've encountered (Win XP, 2000, and Fedora Linux). I found one person who also experienced this, though they were planing the uninstall/reinistall tactic and did not report the results.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    1. Re:Firefox: Location filed - Enter does not work by pspmikek · · Score: 1

      Stupid question.

      Are any other windows open or up at the time?

      If you have the file dialog open for some reason in some other window, enter won't work in other browser windows.

    2. Re:Firefox: Location filed - Enter does not work by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I've seen that. For me it seems to happen when I close all windows but one, and that one window left open is e.g. a flash window carrying a baseball box score thing. If I then open a new window using the FF icon, it won't respond until I close both the flash window and the new FF window, and open a third new FF window.

      Haven't checked if this is an every time thing, but it happens reasonably regularly.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    3. Re:Firefox: Location filed - Enter does not work by Spoing · · Score: 0
      1. Are any other windows open or up at the time?

      Nope -- unless one is being loaded at boot time. I've removed Firefox, reinstalled it, *rebooted*, and the enter key is ignored.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    4. Re:Firefox: Location filed - Enter does not work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had a similar problem. Check in the task manager(ctrl+alt+del) and see if you dont have an instance of firefox running. Usually I have to kill that instance then restart firefox and then firefox works as normal.

    5. Re:Firefox: Location filed - Enter does not work by xutopia · · Score: 1
      Doh!

      That is because you have to press the Any key first!

    6. Re:Firefox: Location filed - Enter does not work by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      I've had similar things happen under xp. Type in an address and hit enter and nothing happens. I find it more frequently when I cut and paste a url and hit enter. SOmetimes I have to delete the last couple letters in the url and type them in again and it works. I've also found that sometimes it is hesitating before responding and if I sit there for 20 seconds it will eventually go to the url.

      But I don't run into it that often, so I haven't worried about it too much.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    7. Re:Firefox: Location filed - Enter does not work by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      I've seen that bug in Netscape 7 - on Mac OS 9!

      The Netscape codebase was on Mozilla 1.3 or something? Hard to believe this is still in firefox and that it affects other platforms.

      The only solution I found back then was to delete the user.js pref file.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    8. Re:Firefox: Location filed - Enter does not work by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Have you tried starting with a fresh profile? Firefox's uninstallation leaves the profile in place (in the documents and settings folder), and, unless you manually remove it, any problems with your profile will carry across an uninstall/reinstall cycle.

    9. Re:Firefox: Location filed - Enter does not work by omicronish · · Score: 1

      Situation: If you type in an address in Firefox -- about:plugins, yahoo.com (with or without http:// and www.) -- and hit enter, nothing happens.

      Just wanted to let you know that you're not alone. I've encountered that problem before, and a variety of other incredibly annoying keyboard problems. It seems like Firefox places the keyboard focus on odd controls in a lot of instances, causing keyboard input to have no effect. This especially occurs when ctrl+tabbing through tabs.

      If there's a Firefox dev out there reading this, pretty please fix these problems! It will be part of the polish and will be what brings me back to Firefox!

  36. Yes, PLEASE FIX THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I open everything in new windows and usually close them using the keyboard. That does not work if the focus is wrong, etc. Mouse-centric folk won't notice this much but it is a killer for me.

    Agreed, I run across it all the time myself. I use tabs, and other tabs are always stealing the focus as I'm typing. This can be a serious security issue because this will often happen as I'm typing in username/passwords and I'll realize that I've typed my password into some other tab and submitted it when I pressed [return].

    1. Re:Yes, PLEASE FIX THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There are extensions that prevent tabs from stealing focus.

    2. Re:Yes, PLEASE FIX THIS by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with extensions--they let the Firefox developers pass the buck to third parties, instead of fixing bugs that really should be resolved in the main codebase.

    3. Re:Yes, PLEASE FIX THIS by almightyjustin · · Score: 1

      That's http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245502 and different from the bug the parent is describing.

      --

      Omnes arx vestrum sunt adiuncta nobis.

  37. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

    I'd actually recommend turning off tabs, just because the newbies will probably be less likely to use Firefox if they have to deal with tabs since it's something different than they're used to.

    Many not-quite-computer-literate people will get very frustrated if any little thing changes, and something like that would probably be enough to send a bunch of them back to IE.

    Plus, tabs suck. New windows 4 lyfe! ;)

  38. Speed by DarkSarin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just downloaded the new version, and all I can say is WOW!

    Previously, startup times were less than that of IE, now I can honestly say that there is no noticeable difference. It also found /. as soon as the browser was opened, no waiting (previously, on the same connection, there was always some delay--and yes, I know network conditions make a huge difference for this).

    If I can show this to people and say, "hey, look, it even starts faster than IE!"--then they will be impressed!

    Kudos to the moz team!

    --
    "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    1. Re:Speed by Nafai7 · · Score: 1

      I experienced the same thing! I honestly don't know how they got it to launch so quick, especially since they don't pre-load a buncha stuff like IE does.

    2. Re:Speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not sure what you're trying to say here:
      Previously, startup times were less than that of IE, now I can honestly say that there is no noticeable difference.

      It was previously better than IE (less time = more goodness) and now is the same? That's a regression. I guessed you simply meant to say "previously, startup times were more than that of IE". But then I read your next paragraph:

      If I can show this to people and say, "hey, look, it even starts faster than IE!"--then they will be impressed!

      How is "no noticeable difference" the same as faster? Which is it? Or are you anticipating it becoming faster yet? I really don't know.

  39. Today's releases of Firefox and Thunderbird? by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 1

    Today's releases of Firefox and Thunderbird seem to have been taken off the FTP server. I downloaded them at home this morning at 7am EST but they are currently (~9am EST) AWOL. I hope they're setting up mirrors and/or bittorrent feeds.

    Damien

  40. Still no MSI package by upside · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For my computer at home I prefer a straight binary with no installer crap, but for corporate deployment a multiuser-friendly MSI package is a must. It's the only thing I miss in FireFox. The point is to deploy FF from a server and have it working for low privilege users without them having to do any work.

    There are some hacks about but I haven't managed to get it working in a satisfactory manner. I'd deploy it across the entire organisation (100 or so PCs) at the drop of a hat if I had a working MSI package. It's a school, too, so many accounts and users per machine.

    --
    I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    1. Re:Still no MSI package by MagicFab · · Score: 3, Informative

      I recently asked the MoFo for information on mass deployments of FF and this is part of the answer: "[...] Misson Desktop Control [...] assists IS departments dynamically customise preferences. Further Firefox 1.0 will also come packagae with a MSI installer."

      --
      Notepad specialist & FAT administrator, group training available
    2. Re:Still no MSI package by bwalling · · Score: 1
      On top of that, check out this blurb from the Thunderbird page:
      Upgraders: DO NOT install Mozilla Thunderbird into a directory containing program files from a previous version. Overwriting files from a previous release WILL cause problems. To re-use the directory of a previous install, the directory must be deleted and recreated, emptied, moved, or renamed. You should not file bugs in Bugzilla if you choose to ignore this step. The program directory does not contain profile information; any existing accounts, account settings, options, e-mail, and news messages will remain intact. This release does not require changes to your profile to function properly.


      That's pretty lousy.
    3. Re:Still no MSI package by b.e.n.n.y_b.o.y_1234 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I created an MSI for Firefox 0.8 using WinInstallLE and deployed throughout my organisation using Group Policy. However it's a bit of a pain to do each time there's an upgrade, and add in all the necessary customisations etc (such as homepage, proxy settings, set as default browser etc).
      It's even harder now, as the profiles directory has changed from Phoenix to Firefox, so it would require writing a script to migrate the users existing settings to the new location.

      Ben.

    4. Re:Still no MSI package by b.e.n.n.y_b.o.y_1234 · · Score: 1

      I also asked the TB devs about this many months ago and was told the same thing about Mission Control Desktop. However my requests for more information about it (such as where I could get it, or even just read about it!) were ignored.
      So I just built an MSI package and wrote a script to automate profile creation at install time with all our custom settings in.

    5. Re:Still no MSI package by jaxon6 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've created ff and tb msi releases. Available at
      http://biomicro.mit.edu/people/patpaul/mozilla -msi .html
      I've had good luck with them, as have other sysadmins, who email me when the version on the page doesn't match the latest version.

      --
      Do you see the sig? Do you have it in your sights? Why yes, Miss Moneypenny...
    6. Re:Still no MSI package by njko · · Score: 1

      A good Msi including language support and configured extensions. then i would install in every computer in my company.

      --
      \n.\n
    7. Re:Still no MSI package by ptlis · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Why not make an MSI package? I worked at a school for a year or so and I used the InstallShield AdminStudio trial version to make MSI packages for The GIMP and a whole load of other FOSS software to roll out across the Campus (~350 machines excluding administration). Being as this is /. i'm sure somebody in the know will point you to a FOSS solution but this was the best solution we had.

      --
      There's mischief and malarkies but no queers or yids or darkies within this bastard's carnival, this vicious cabaret.
    8. Re:Still no MSI package by phoenix12345 · · Score: 1

      Corporate deployment is key to widespread adoption. It'll be good for the companies because they'll have fewer spyware/trojan horse/virus problems. But it'll also be the first time many nontechies will see FireFox, leading more of them to use it at home. Even though most slashdotters use it, we're only a small piece of the browser market.

  41. Eeewww!! by gstoddart · · Score: 1
    The one thing I was waiting for in Thunderbird. Putting all your POP3 accounts into one main folder.


    Why the heck would I want that? The same way I don't want the big honkin' PST file of doom that Outlook wants to give me, I want to be able to separate out the e-mail from various sources.

    I suspect you might be in a minority as far as people wanting that feature goes.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Eeewww!! by GnuAge · · Score: 1
      • I want to be able to separate out the e-mail from various sources.


      Well you can always sort your email by accounts if that is handy, even if all you email is in one Inbox.

      I've accumulated something like 9 POP3 accounts over the years and in Moz Mail each one had its own Inbox, Drafts, Templates, Sent & Trash folder, so to keep them all expanded (so I didn't have to click on the account and click on the Inbox to read my mail), I had to scroll down to check all my accounts, and even further if I wanted to have my own mail 'sort & store' folders. Plus, I had to click on 9 separate Inboxes to see my mail.

      I used to try a complex system of filters to dump everything in a single Inbox. It was a pain to set up and didn't always work. Plus I had all those useless folders, including the 'Local Folders' folders. I just ended up using Outlook Express, Kmail or Evolution, depending on OS.

      The 'all in one folder' option is also available in the Mozilla 1.8PR branch, by the way. It works pretty well, but one caveat. If you store your email on the server for a time, disable the "Leave on Server: Until I Delete Or Remove From The Inbox" option, or you'll find your mail removed from the server prematurely when you reorganize your mail folders.

      • I suspect you might be in a minority as far as people wanting that feature goes.


      I wouldn't be too sure of that. Microsoft extensively tests for UI, and they obviously concluded that most people would prefer a single Inbox. But even if it is a minority of actual Mozilla/Thunderbird users, it is a fairly substantial minority, and for those that want it, its not really negotiable. It is long since past time that this feature was available, IMO.
  42. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I would have agreed with you several months back about Outlook having better features and whatnot, Outlook, for no apparent reason (good ol' MS software), started having a mysterious problem with passwords which meant I couldn't access any of my emails on any of my accounts. Having used Thunderbird in it's early releases, I wasn't too keen about swapping back to it, but I had no other choice (well, apart from webmail, but then I can't tell whenever I recieve emails, which is always a pain).
    After swapping back, I had realised that Thunderbird had improved greatly and I'm very glad that Outlook b0rked up, otherwise I'd probably still be using it now.

    Thunderbird probably does have a lot of features that Outlook doesn't have (or at least didn't appear to have), but I'm perfectly happy with the features Thunderbird does have and I don't require anything extra from it. It's interface looks much better than Outlooks boring GUI and it's junk mail filter is also extremely accurate, IMO - having marked around 98% of my junk emails as junk emails, with only 1 or 2 false positives in the whole time I've used it.

    Anyway, you mustn't forget that features shouldn't be the only reason to swap over.. Outlook does have severe security issues that need to be addressed (anyone have a link to that bug where people aren't supposed to start emails with a certain word, because it makes Outlook think the rest of the email is actually a file? HAH!). Yeah, Thunderbird might have security issues too, but I seel much safer with TB than OL.

    My 2c.

  43. 0.9 0.10? by citizenc · · Score: 1

    But isn't that wrong?

  44. Pop up windows in tabs by milgr · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I prefer to not popup most popups, but the ones that I want should show up in tabs instead of new windows.

    Galeon let me have all popups show up in new tabs.
    Firefox 0.9.3 blocks some popups, has some pop up in tabs, and others in windows.

    Will this issue be fixed?

    Unfortunately I do need popups for an application at work which is at a well defined web address. That application must use two different ways to popup windows. Some show up in new tabs, some in new windows in Firfox. In Galeon they all showed up in new tabs.

    --
    Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
    1. Re:Pop up windows in tabs by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      "but the ones that I want should show up in tabs instead of new windows"

      Considering that IE doesn't have tabs AT ALL, I find this an odd requirement of yours. Maybe it's just the way you worded it.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    2. Re:Pop up windows in tabs by mr_null · · Score: 1

      Get "TabBrowser Extensions" for Firefox. Can set it for only one window, and to open everything in tabs.
      http://white.sakura.ne.jp/~piro/xul/_tabextensions .html.en

    3. Re:Pop up windows in tabs by milgr · · Score: 1
      "but the ones that I want should show up in tabs instead of new windows"

      Considering that IE doesn't have tabs AT ALL, I find this an odd requirement of yours. Maybe it's just the way you worded it.

      I'm not coming from IE, but Galeon. I avoid using IE most of the time. But then, IE doesn't work on Linux, and I almost never run Windows.
      --
      Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
    4. Re:Pop up windows in tabs by milgr · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

      That is just what I was looking for. I moved from Galeon to Firefox because Fedora stopped supporting Galeon. But, Firefox had inferior popup blocking support.

      I tried out the tabextensions. They do everything I want them to do!

      --
      Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
    5. Re:Pop up windows in tabs by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the random tab vs. new window for popups is an oversight. You should post that bug/feature request on their web site

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  45. MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by jvmatthe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The links to MozillaNews are dead currently, so I can't check, but here goes my biggest complaint with Mozilla/Firefox. If you know how I can do what I want, by the way, please reply so I can start using Firefox more efficiently.

    Sure, it may render pages on all platforms exactly the same, and give the same Javascript behavior. That's great, and I appreciate it.

    But what is really getting me down is that I cannot, to my knowledge, browse using keyboard navigation on MacOS X like I can on both Windows and Linux. I use Find-as-You-Type and navigation among links with the Tab key all the time on Linux and Windows, but when I start using my Powerbook I have to give most of that up and use the touchpad.

    For example, in the administration portion of a website that I work on, if I'd like to be able to make a new entry into the database, I can do it all without a mouse on Windows or Linux. I tab among the text entry boxes, dropdown boxes, and buttons and do my work. I can get to another tab and grab some text or a link, and then back to the tab where I'm doing data entry and paste the retreived information. All without the mouse.

    Unless there is something big I'm missing, you absolutely cannot do this on MacOS X with the same efficiency.

    I now work from time to time on all three major platforms: Windows, MacOS X, and Linux. While I like various parts of all three, I have to say that I find the keyboard accessibility of GNOME and Mozilla on Linux preferable to anything on the other two. Then again, Linux is also where I've spent the most time, but it sure was easier to find the keystrokes and customization options I wanted there than it is on Windows (and, so far, MacOS X).

    Incidentally, I have also tried Safari (has the Option-Tab keystroke for navigating a page like I want, but even with Saft it doesn't have good Find-as-You-Type) and Camino (same problems as Firefox) and Mozilla (same as Camino and Firefox) all without any luck. Oh well.

    1. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      Alas, this is the reason that I also use Safari. I just downloaded the new one and it suffers teh same problem *sigh*

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    2. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox > Preferences > Advanced > Accessibility > USE FIND AS YOU TYPE

      System Preferences > Keyboard > Mouse > Keyboard Shortcuts > TURN ON FULL KEYBOARD ACCESS

    3. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by cerenyx · · Score: 1

      Just to add to this, on a slightly related note:

      I understand that in Firefox Ctrl-Tab allows you to tab between tabs, in a one-way fashion. However, both Safari and Camino under Mac OS X allow you to move between yours tabs in both directions:

      Safari uses Apple-Shift-Left/Right Arrow, and Camino uses Apple-Option-Left/Right Arrow.

      It would be great if someone added this feature into Firefox; I'm one of those users who use the keyboard primarily to do almost everything.

    4. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by jvmatthe · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that this allows you to tab among links in a page using Mozilla, Firefox, or Camino? Because I have had those on since I got my Powerbook, and it doesn't help a bit. Is there some other keystroke, besides Tab that allows you to navigate links in a page? If you know otherwise, then perhaps you could elaborate...

    5. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by jvmatthe · · Score: 1

      I don't know about other Mac keyboards, but on my Powerbook I can Fn+Ctrl+Up (i.e. PgUp) and Fn+Ctrl+Down (i.e. PgDn) and navigate tabs both directions on Firefox. Does that help?

    6. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by SiliconRedox · · Score: 1

      ctrl-tab for tabbed navigation, command-tilde for window cycling. There is still the problem of not being able to tab into a combo-box, though.

    7. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Autofill. That's the only reason I use Safari on my Mac. If there was an autofill extension for Firefox that linked to my vcard in Address Book, I'd switch and never look back.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    8. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by kgerich · · Score: 3, Informative
      You can tab to controls in the content area on Mac using these instructions:
      1. Type about:config in the URL bar.
      2. In the Filter field, type tabfocus.
      3. Double-click on the accessibility.tabfocus preference.
      4. Change the value to 7.
      You might have to restart the browser.
    9. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by daeley · · Score: 1

      In Firefox on Mac OS X, Ctrl-Tab goes one way, and Ctrl-Shift-Tab goes the other.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    10. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      Yes, another nice Safari feature. Apple certainly did a good job.

      While we're on the subject, working Emacs keybindings in the browser (just like mail and everything else). Not that I like Emacs as an editor, but it nice to have teh same commands work in the borwser, in the shell and in mail messages.

      I did just figure out how to hack these into Firefox as I was googling for a solution to the other problem, but damn! Address book integration. I forgot about that...

      These guys from Apple want me hooked!

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    11. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by P-Nuts · · Score: 1

      And what about Mac mouse navigation? On Windows and Linux Firefox, middle-clicking a link brings up a new tab, but this doesn't work on Mac. Also, there's a strange baby window that appears with Exposé and can't be gotten rid of. These faults are annoying enough to prevent my using it on my Mac. Sure, I know about Camino and Safari, but it would be less taxing on my mind if I could use the same browser on any platform, and I regularly use all three platforms.

    12. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by jvmatthe · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Way up. Appears to work, even without a browser restart.

      Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

      Now I can send in gmail without the mouse. And, post this reply without using the mouse.

    13. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by JohnGalt00 · · Score: 1

      You can use the same browser on all three platforms: firefox. Camino is so close to firefox that I don't notice. Additionally, both firefox and camino support middle button newtabs.

    14. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by mios · · Score: 1

      That's amazing that you knew this ... but how the /hell/ did you figure that out?
      Firefox has been my default browser for long time, but I had no idea ... is there some über reference to about:config or user.js that I don't know about? Thanks.

    15. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by mactari · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is great news. Firefox is now, finally, after years of searching, *the* killer-browser it is on other platforms. It's almost enough I wish I'd kept up with /. after I dropped programming for a living -- to have the points to mod this up.

      There are now really only two and a half places Firefox loses to any other OS X browser:
      1.) Speed. Safari still kicks arse there, and on a 500 MHz G3 iBook, that makes a difference.
      2.) Spell-check in textboxes like Omniweb, though I'm betting that's plug-in fixable if it hasn't been done already
      2.5.) Omniweb has very nice thumbnails for each tab that shows the tab's page looks like. That's really more useful than I ever thought it could be.

      That said, this makes Firefox my daily browser now on my G4 iMac. Was playing with Camino a bit, as it allowed tabbing to select drop-downs, but now we've got it all, minus what's above, in one place. Phew!

      --

      It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
    16. Re:MacOS X Keyboard Navigation? by bsmoor01 · · Score: 1

      It was a tip in this month's mac world. The same thing was infurating me, as well.

  46. Best news... by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


    Hey, this is the best news I have heard since we found out the crazy Russian guy was wrong when he said the internet was going to down a couple weeks ago!

    Until I found out that his prophecy must be tru, because it tells me I can't download Firefox when I try!!!

  47. Odd Firefox behavior by Schwartzboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've never has the problem you describe on either of my Win98 machines , but then I haven't been home yet to install RC1 on them either. I have, however, gotten the follwing message and some variants after closing some tabs after opening several at once:

    "TypeError: arrViewNodes[j].contentWindow has no properties"

    I can consistently reproduce it by opening a new tab that's blank & then closing after a few seconds or a few minutes without loading anything into it. This is on a WinXP Pro machine (no SP2, thank you very much) with an RC1 install that's less than an hour old.

    --
    "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
  48. Mirror by otter42 · · Score: 2

    I just converted. Yaay! Mirror, to save their poor souls.

    Firefox
    Thunderbird

    However, I don't suggest updating right away if you like how your current firefox is customized. None of my cool extensions or themes made the switch. I especially miss tabbrowser extensions.

    --
    www.eissq.com/BandP.html Ball and Plate System. Amuse your friends. Crush your enemies.
  49. At last! Professionalism! by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mozilla.org renders buggily in Konqueror. So much for 100%-compatible HTML.

    Seriously though, it's been a long time coming, and 'Firefox 1.0' sounds a far more serious product than 'Firefox 0.9.3' or whatever - the latter sounds very much like an amateurish effort, while the former sounds sleek and professional - maybe now I can convince a few more upper-management types at my college to switch over to FF, if we were to slap a Netscape-esque skin on it (I have a dislike for the new default theme in Firefox) as the admins have been bitching for a while now about how much spyware crap they have to clean off the machines at the end of every day. I'm sure they've asked before, but "We'd like to replace Internet Explorer with Firefox Nought-point-Nine-point-Three" is just going to sound to the management like the network guys just hashed it up in an afternoon.

    --
    Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
  50. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ah, here's the link to that bug.

    And in true MS style, the solution is... not to use that word at the start of email messages.

  51. RSS feature doesn't work on Slashdot.org by ewg · · Score: 4, Informative
    The RSS detection feature doesn't work on Slashdot. There needs to be a link element, something like:
    <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS feed" href="http://slashdot.org/slashdot.rdf"/>
    Then this new release of Firefox will display an RSS icon in the status bar, from which the user can create special "feed" bookmarks.
    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
    1. Re:RSS feature doesn't work on Slashdot.org by falconed · · Score: 1

      I just installed firefox 1.0PR and came back to this page. One of the first differences I noticed was the RSS button in the bottom right. When clicked, it says "Subscribe to Slashdot RSS..." and lets you save a "live" bookmark anywhere you would save a normal bookmark. When I pulled up the live bookmark, it shows up as a folder, the contents of which are titles/links to each of the stories currently on slashdot. Pretty f'ing cool, although I'm still looking forward to trying out the new RSS reader in Thunderbird.

      --
      USE='clever' emerge -u sig
    2. Re:RSS feature doesn't work on Slashdot.org by AGTiny · · Score: 1

      They just added it. :) I did the same on my website, pretty cool stuff.

    3. Re:RSS feature doesn't work on Slashdot.org by cs02rm0 · · Score: 1

      It works for me?

      Look here
      (Apologies for the dodgy colours - I'm stuck on a 2k machine so I saved the screenie with MS Paint :s)

    4. Re:RSS feature doesn't work on Slashdot.org by ewg · · Score: 5, Informative
      It seems to be working for some Slashdot users, but not others:
      When registered, logged-in users check the Light box, to apply the minimalist skin to Slashdot, there's no RSS link. (Workaround: revert to standard skin.)
      That's why I thought Slashdot wasn't supporting it. Here's hoping it's added to the Light skin soon.
      --
      org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  52. Save tabs? by Kokuyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When will firefox allow me to save my tab settings? Or have I just missed the function? That's what keeps me with Opera. Opera remembers the tabs I used last time so I don't have to reopen every single messageboard everytime I go online.

    Another thing is the speed under linux... Is there a way to make that thing load quicker? I don't like to wait a dozen seconds just for the browser to appear.

    1. Re:Save tabs? by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 2, Informative

      One solution to your "saved" idea is to add a folder to your "bookmarks toolbar" folder. Place your favorites into it; upon startup, merely click on that folder, and choose "open in tabs".

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    2. Re:Save tabs? by Kurrurrin · · Score: 1

      You could just bookmark all those MBs and place them in one bookmark folder. When you go to that bookmark folder, you'll see at the bottom of the drop down "Open in tabs". That will open all of the bookmarks there in their own tabs. Enjoy.

      --
      -Doug
    3. Re:Save tabs? by MagicFab · · Score: 1

      Tools > Opions > General | Home Page > Use Current Pages

      --
      Notepad specialist & FAT administrator, group training available
    4. Re:Save tabs? by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Install TabBrowser Extensions. It has the save features (among other really nice enhancements)

      --
      You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    5. Re:Save tabs? by matlhDam · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Session Saver extension will do what you want, I think.

    6. Re:Save tabs? by kk2796 · · Score: 1

      I think you miss the point. With Opera, I can be browsing 20 different sites, and have an "Oh Crap, I'm going to miss the bus!" moment. Whether I just close Opera, log off, close all porgrams, or even power cycle; the next time I come back to the computer, Opera will let me pick up where I left off. No extra steps, no saving, no extensions to download and install, no bookmarks or bookmark folders to fiddle with, nothing like that. Just turn Opera off, and turn it back on, and *bam*, there's where you left off... I think that's the functionality the poster is referring to - does Mozilla have anything similar?

    7. Re:Save tabs? by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      TBE was good, but it got really bloated IMHO. i use Session Saver and miniT at the mo'. (both working in the new release). does what i need alright.

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    8. Re:Save tabs? by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes I did miss the point. And no, FF doesn't have that. Could probably make an extension for it, though... but personally, after suffering years of IE usage trauma, most users might not see the difference between such an extension and the typical IE Hijack unless it's done right.

      Eh, mebbie I'll get bored this weekend and see if I can throw something together (if it doesn't already exist), because it sounds like a fun one.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    9. Re:Save tabs? by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      Does TabBrowser extensions work properly with the new version of Firefox? At work I have 0.8 and it works they way I configured it--when I click on a link, it opens in a new window. On my home computer, I've tried each of the 0.9 releases and TBE didn't work with any of them, insisting on opening links in the same window.

    10. Re:Save tabs? by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
      Dunno, as I desire the opposite configuration. :)

      There's a whole slew of Options in the Tab Tabbrowser Extension Preferences under the Advanced Tabbrowsing tab.

      The default settings have all new windows opening in tabs, IIRC, and you can uncheck them to make it work as new windows.

      --
      You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    11. Re:Save tabs? by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      Whoops. I made a typo. I meant that I want all links and bookmarks to open in new tabs. But my copy of 0.9.whatever insists on opening links and bookmarks in the existing tab.

    12. Re:Save tabs? by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

      Tabbrowser Preferences --> Features --> Lock That should do ya fine

      --
      You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  53. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    IE is already blocking tabs on my office system. And you know what? I still think Firefox has enough killer features to make IE an also-ran.

  54. niggles by agentforsythe · · Score: 1
    I exclusively use firefox on linux... but still miss a couple of things from IE.

    • Pressing ctrl + D on firefox focuses the address bar, but doesn't highlight the text.
    • Backspace doesn't go 'back'
    Nothing at all major... but I still find myself using those shortcuts, and finding they don't work as expected.

    I certainly don't miss pop-ups, spyware and general bugginess though.
    1. Re:niggles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Pressing ctrl + D on firefox focuses the address bar, but doesn't highlight the text.

      Try ctrl + L

    2. Re:niggles by agentforsythe · · Score: 1

      ooooh

      you just made one geek very happy.

      Thanks

    3. Re:niggles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backspace does go back for me, using Firefox 1.0PR and Fedora Core 2. I don't think it's new to 1.0 either, it's always worked for me.

    4. Re:niggles by Random+Web+Developer · · Score: 1

      # Pressing ctrl + D on firefox focuses the address bar, but doesn't highlight the text.

      You are using it on linux, highlighting would overwrite urls that might have been copied by selecting them and middle click would paste the wrong url

      # Backspace doesn't go 'back'

      it's even better than backspace, you can press alt and the forward or back arrow, so you can go forward too

      --
      Artists against online scams http://www.aa419.org/
    5. Re:niggles by ratpack91 · · Score: 1

      alt-D works as well.

    6. Re:niggles by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > ctrl + D on firefox focuses the address bar, but doesn't highlight the text.

      What you want is Ctrl + L.

      > Backspace doesn't go 'back'

      And, more generally, there's no easy UI for remapping the keyboard shortcuts.
      There should be.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  55. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Kernkraft400 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The link to PDFCreator you gave is a dead site, try the Sourceforge project page instead... http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/

  56. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by CaptnMArk · · Score: 0

    I agree with no-tabs.

    I also prefer new windows. Now, how to lobby for desktop-global bookmarks sidebar....

    (there is one thing where tabs are great: browsing pr0n... something like tab slideshow might be nice)

  57. link handling in Linux / KDE? by BigGerman · · Score: 4, Informative
    One of the major, major annoyances for me is inability to open mailto: urls in Firefox using Thunderbird and vise versa (http links in Thunderbird in Firefox).
    Yes, I googled and yes there is a solution involving a shell script(s) and installing arcane extention in 'Fox, but:
    This solution does not work for me; and overall, the shell script thing will be an immeditate turn off for someone converting from Windows (where by the way, Fox and Bird integrate perfectly including even XP login screen).

    So does anyone know if there was any progress on this front with the new releases?

    1. Re:link handling in Linux / KDE? by Sunspire · · Score: 1

      It seems to be working fine for me with the new versions. Thunderbird 0.8 asked me if it was to be set as the default mail application, I said yes and now mailto: links open up in Thunderbird. It supposedly uses the GNOME "preferred applications" framework, so your mileage may vary under other desktops.

      Links from Thunderbird open up in Firefox 1.0PR just fine too. Previously there was all sorts of problems, for me it only worked once and after that the damn profile manager dialog would pop up. But it all seems to be sorted out now.

      --
      It's like deja vu all over again.
    2. Re:link handling in Linux / KDE? by altstadt · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is no need for shell scripts, but it is annoying that it doesn't work out of the box on Linux the same way it does on Windows.

      Shut down Firefox and Thunderbird. Replace foo below with the appropriate random characters for the directory names on your system. Make sure each command is all on one line. Fix up any extra spaces added by /.

      Firefox: echo 'user_pref("network.protocol-handler.app.mailto", "/usr/bin/thunderbird");' >> ~/.mozilla/firefox/default.foo/user.js Thunderbird: echo 'user_pref("network.protocol-handler.app.http", "/usr/bin/firefox");' >> ~/.thunderbird/default.foo/user.js

      Note that this has only been tested for Firefox 0.9.3 and Thunderbird 0.7.3. YMMV.

    3. Re:link handling in Linux / KDE? by Christianfreak · · Score: 1

      I'm using Fedora, and when I installed Firefox via apt, the shell script it uses just works.

      Desktop Linux really needs a unified place for specifying what application handles what mimetypes or protocols. Something somewhere between the current /etc/magic file and the Window's registry. I think it would solve several problems including this one.

      This stuff doesn't happen on Windows with Firefox. Actually things seem to work correctly in Gnome too but that might be a Fedora/Redhat thing. At anyrate I'm using BlackBox and I don't have a problem with the shell script.

    4. Re:link handling in Linux / KDE? by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Desktop Linux really needs a unified place for specifying what application handles what mimetypes or protocols.

      Something like this?

      I like visiting the freedesktop.org specs page, it makes me feel like the linux desktop is finally standardizing.

    5. Re:link handling in Linux / KDE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also find GNOME to handle this well with its preferred programs settings.

      I've tried it with both Firefox/Thunderbird and Firefox/Mutt.

  58. posting the links on slashdot... by not_a_product_id · · Score: 1
    ... is a pretty good start.

    I was veryglad to see a new Thunderbird version. Roll on TB1.0!

    --

    ---
    We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

  59. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by 3terrabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh come on...
    Friends don't let friends use IE.

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  60. Huh?? by FJ · · Score: 1, Interesting
    This is from the Firefox web site.

    The Firefox 1.0 Preview Release has been released. The 1.0 final release won't be out for another month or so, and as such, the version number for this release is 0.10PR. For those who still count in decimal, 0.10 is larger than 0.9, despite what you were taught in school. Check out the Release Notes, the System Requirements, and follow the links below to download a copy now!

    How is 0.10 larger than 0.9? The last time I checked, 9 tenths is larger than 1 tenth. Granted my math skills are rusty, but that doesn't sound right.

    1. Re:Huh?? by Astatine · · Score: 1

      Just in case you're not joking... ;-)

      The "0.9" and "0.10" there aren't single decimal numbers, they're major and minor version numbers -- separate numbers that are (as per tradition) separated by a dot. So minor version 10 is greater than minor version 9 :)

    2. Re:Huh?? by Robmonster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Think of it as "Zero point eight" , "Zero point nine", "Zero point ten" and so on.

      Much the same numbering system as used by ATI's Catalyst Drivers.

      --
      I have no sig yet I must scream.
    3. Re:Huh?? by penwing · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, 0.9.3 wouldn't pass as a suitable maths answer. It's not maths, it's versioning - it is 0.10 not one tenth to 2 decimal places.

    4. Re:Huh?? by sremick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      0.10 is larger than 0.9 because it's not decimal. The period is simply a separator.

      You should know that Mozilla doesn't consider them to be decimal when you have Mozilla 1.7.3 out also. If you saw 1.7.3 and 1.10.2 which would you think was newer?

      This is common practice for MANY projects.

    5. Re:Huh?? by jdaily · · Score: 1

      How is 0.10 larger than 0.9? The last time I checked, 9 tenths is larger than 1 tenth.

      Indeed, but 9 tenths is smaller than 10 tenths.

      The key phrase from the web site was For those who still count in decimal; for those who could in "versional", 0.10 > 0.9.

    6. Re:Huh?? by norkakn · · Score: 1

      We are nerds, right? why not use HEX? Version 0.A

    7. Re:Huh?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there's no such thing as "half a version", so periods as separators are completely unambiguous. There are, however alpha releases, signified by 'a' and beta releases signified by 'b', so hex would be ambiguous.

    8. Re:Huh?? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      So... I guess you don't pay attention to Linux kernel version numbering. Oh well.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    9. Re:Huh?? by mistersooreams · · Score: 1

      Because "nought point ten" is bigger than "nought point nine". It's hard to recognise jokes without the magic "5, Funny" isn't it?

    10. Re:Huh?? by norkakn · · Score: 1

      oh come on 0.A.Fa is totally readable

      Next you'll be telling me that 2'b00, 2'b01: a ? c : 1; is hard to read

      yeash.. people these days (-:

  61. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Trigun · · Score: 1

    You shouldn't. the new version removes a lot of sluggishness from the startup and page rendering. The 8 meg download and one minute install is more than worth it.

  62. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    I don't think there's a need (or way) to disable tabs in Firefox. Maybe with an extension. However, if you don't middle click on links, and left click in the Bookmark menu, etc, (in other words -- how IE users would use Firefox) I wonder if you'll ever see tabs in Firefox?

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  63. Mandrakelinux packages available by G�tz · · Score: 1
    As with the last versions, I've built packages for Mandrakelinux 10.0 for mozilla-firefox and mozilla-thunderbird. They are in my urpmi repository.

    Versions for 10.1 and source packages are in the Cooker Contribs.

    1. Re:Mandrakelinux packages available by russint · · Score: 1

      Anyone know when fedora rpms will be out?

      --
      ^^
  64. Did it by TrentL · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend's family is getting high-speed internet access installed today. I forwarded her the Firefox homepage. She's pretty open to using Firefox on my own computer, so I think there's a good chance she'll get her parents to use it. I have a hunch her dad is fed up with all the IE-related crap.

  65. Not My Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a new Firefox user (thanks in most part to Slashdot), in fact I have version 0.9.3 and I have never had the problems you have stated, at least in the past month that I've been using this non-IE browser. Because of it's features and security I've convinced others to use it as well, and most of them (and me) really liked IE before seeing what else was available.

  66. nooooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefox 1.0PR broke my Firesomething plugin! Whatever will I do without Mozilla Superyak?

  67. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
    "(anyone have a link to that bug where people aren't supposed to start emails with a certain word, because it makes Outlook think the rest of the email is actually a file? HAH!)"

    Sounds like the uuencode bug. Found it here.

  68. Broken Additions by tilleyrw · · Score: 1

    I was running StumbleUpon and the Google toolbar for Firefox 0.9.3 and informed they were broken upon installing 1.0PR.

    Did they find it necessary to brake APIs between 0.9.3 and the current version? The automatic update checker in Firefox can't fird updates for those two toolbars.

    --
    This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
  69. Link to Mozilla mirrors by bach37 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here ya go!

  70. Re:0.9 0.10? by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1

    No, it's not. It's just different semantics.
    The dot does not play the decimal point role, it's just a number separator.
    The complete release "number" is not a math (floating point) number, it's composed by some integer numbers, and sometime letters, separated by the dot.

  71. New features by numatrix · · Score: 4, Informative
    0.10 is listed as a 'Technology Preview' so there's actually lots of new interesting bits thrown in. From the release notes:
    • Live Bookmarks

      You can now subscribe to and read RSS feeds in your Bookmarks. When you visit a page that advertises a RSS feed by using a <link> tag, an (RSS) icon will appear in the status bar. Click it to view a list of feeds the page is offering. Click one to subscribe - this adds a Bookmark Folder that contains all the recent posts from the feed.

    • Improved Find

      Find is easier and more powerful now with our new Find toolbar. The Find toolbar (which shows at the bottom of the browser window) automatically highlights text in the page as you type and has a useful highlight feature.

    • Managing Annoyances and Protecting Security

      You can now open blocked popups, and the Extension install system now blocks all attempts to install software from sites other than update.mozilla.org. Users can add other sites to a list that allows them to offer software, but software is never automatically installed. In addition to these steps, several other measures have been taken to prevent phishing attacks and to highlight when a page is being viewed over a secure connection.

    • Better Bookmarks

      Numerous improvements to bookmarks including more reliable presentation of Site icons, and a split pane view in the Bookmarks window.

    • Strong Encryption For Passwords Available

      Passwords saved with the Password Manager can now be more easily encrypted with strong encryption by creating a "Master Password". If you create a Master Password, you are prompted once per session to enter the Master Password so that Password Manager can automatically fill in site logins. A useful feature for people who share computers with others and want improved security.

    • Improved Compatibility for IE users

      Undetectable document.all support for site compatibility and improved compatibility for keyboard accelerators further smooth the transition for IE users

    • Better System Integration for GNOME users

      You can now configure Firefox as your Default Browser on GNOME, and Firefox will adhere to your GNOME settings for edit field key bindings, etc.

    • And a horde of other bug fixes...
    1. Re:New features by balster+neb · · Score: 1

      A much better list of new features in this preview release can be found here. Nice screenshots included.

      A more detailed list of changes can be found here.

      Overall, I'm pretty excited that this new release actually has new features, and is not simply a more polished and stable 0.9. The new find toolbar will greatly improve the usability of type-ahead find, and the 'LiveBookmarks' feature is promising.

      Also of note, there is a new 'Information Toolbar' that appears in the top area notifying the user if a popup has been blocked. It's an idea pinched from IE6 SP2, but a good one. It's also used to notify the user if an extension installation failed.

      Having the adress bar get a padlock icon and turn yellow when on an encrypted site is also a welcome change. This kind of feature would hugely enhance the 'Secure Browser' image firefox is trying to sell.

      Am I switching yet? No, I'm going to wait up to a few days till the extensions I use (adblock, dictionary search, image zoom and a few others) are updated. Can't wait

    2. Re:New features by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Have they fixed the memory hog bug yet?

      Here's how it works... Mozilla will use up all memory that you give it. Seems to be coded to use up to 1/3 of physical memory.

      Back when I had 512MB on this machine, it would limit itself to 175-200MB. Then I added another 256MB... Mozilla proceeded to gobble up 300MB.

      Just dropped in *another* 256MB (now have 1GB). Mozilla now regularly eats up 400-450MB if I have multiple browser windows open with multiple tabs. Especially if I use it for a few days (I reboot about every two weeks on this WinXP box).

      Horrid, piggish behavior.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    3. Re:New features by ricotest · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forward to all of these features (although the first PR I tried didn't save any of my passwords of 'don't show this dialog again' settings, so I reverted to 0.9.3) - however, this is especially cool:

      Numerous improvements to bookmarks including more reliable presentation of Site icons...

      I'm sure I'm not the only one to have built up a nice links bar full of icons and suddenly have them all get replaced with the generic one every so often.

  72. some website still dont work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    websites that dont work with fierfox

    http://www.orange.co.in

    http://www.bplmobile.com/

  73. It's been done by forsythe450 · · Score: 1
    Some folks at UW - Platteville have already rewritten the slashdot using CSS. It even renders correctly in Firefox. I wonder how difficult it would be to convert the live site...

    Check it out at http://www.uwplatt.edu/web/webstandards/slashdot.h tml

    --
    Did you ride the short bus? http://sh.ortb.us
  74. /. is first on this one by Siener · · Score: 1

    For a change, slashdot really got the scoop here. The release notes aren't even updated yet.

    So far I have noticed a few new features. Search as you type now shows more info and has extra options. There is also a RSS button at the bottom right of the status bar for any page that has a RSS feed. Clicking on it creates a "Live Bookmark".

    Anybody else notice other new features I missed?

    Only negative thing so far is that my favourite extension (DownloadWith) no longer works ... but I suspect that will be fixed soon.

    1. Re:/. is first on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they did. Check the comment right before yours. They just didn't update the main releases index.

  75. without adblock is worthless by njko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i installed 1.0PR few seconds ago and i missing adblock already

    --
    \n.\n
    1. Re:without adblock is worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've just upgraded AdBlock with no problems.

    2. Re:without adblock is worthless by njko · · Score: 1

      i had trouble, but i could do it
      now i want my find as i type only for links

      --
      \n.\n
    3. Re:without adblock is worthless by Kurrurrin · · Score: 1

      There is an update for adblock. Just go to Tools > Extensions and select adblock, then click update. Easy as that.

      --
      -Doug
    4. Re:without adblock is worthless by njko · · Score: 1

      -not a valid install package- was the response to "Tools > Extensions and select adblock, then click update" i retry and worked.

      --
      \n.\n
    5. Re:without adblock is worthless by caseih · · Score: 1

      Privoxy works well in this area and as an added bonus works for all my browsers, whether I'm using galeon, firefox, or IE. With privoxy, I've never had a reason to use adblock.

  76. one feature I would have liked by mshultz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anybody know how to make Thunderbird only display messages on an IMAP server that have not been marked as deleted?

    I use Thunderbird on my laptop and Outlook on my desktop (have to use it there), and frequently I end up with quite a few messages in my inbox (most of which are deleted) by the time I check my mail again using Thunderbird. There has to be a better solution besides purging all my deleted messages before using Thunderbird every time-- since sometimes I screw up and need to recover deleted messages...

    I've looked in the View-Messages-Customize menu option, but there doesn't seem to be a field for the message's IMAP deletion status- any ideas?

    1. Re:one feature I would have liked by forsythe450 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I switched from OE to Thunderbird a few months ago and it handles IMAP accounts much better.

      The best solution I can think of for your problem is to move messages into a Trash folder rather than deleting them in Outlook. Thunderbird does this automatically when you delete a message if you set it up under server settings. I believe you'll have to do it manually with Outlook, but it should accomplish what you're looking for.

      --
      Did you ride the short bus? http://sh.ortb.us
  77. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    IE will soon be blocking popups.

    It already does. SP2 added that capability. Of course, the Google toolbar had been blocking them too. I was running Norton Internet Security which also had a popup blocker. Now I run Admuncher which blows Adblock away. The point is, popup/ad blocking isn't the selling point you may think it is. It's all about the tabs. But you can install the Avant browser which adds tabs to IE so tabs aren't that big a deal either really. I guess the smaller size might be a selling point to people with really old systems.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
  78. Music by Neward+Rylet · · Score: 1
    Firefox, Thunderbird, Suite Released

    Sounds like something Wagner would do.
  79. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Val314 · · Score: 1

    if Thunderbird could *fully* replace outlook (not Express)...

  80. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by dubbayu_d_40 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Openoffice exports to pdf.

  81. webmail by bytesmythe · · Score: 4, Funny

    The main thing that keeps me from using any PC-based email clients is the fact that I LOVE webmail.

    Hell, I'm just waiting for someone to come up with a web-based browser. I'd switch in a heartbeat!

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
    1. Re:webmail by Back_in_black · · Score: 0

      a web-based browser

      dammit, yes...a groundbreaking idea!

    2. Re:webmail by eleknader · · Score: 1

      Take a look at this :)

    3. Re:webmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hell, I'm just waiting for someone to come up with a web-based browser. I'd switch in a heartbeat!"

      Howabout some of these?

    4. Re:webmail by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I'm working on one, but like many webmail apps, for security reasons, it doesn't render HTML.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:webmail by bytesmythe · · Score: 1

      Ha!!! I wish I could mod that up. :)

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
  82. Firefox is getting big. by SinaSa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    O.K so I know I'm replying late and I will probably be missed by the mods but who cares.

    Firefox is getting big. I'm in Australia, so I know our Law & Order episodes are behind you in the Americas, but a few nights ago watching an episode of SVU I saw one of the detectives pull open her laptop, and run a google search. As soon as she did it, I noticed she was using Firefox for win32!

    If it's getting used in show props as a realistic tool, it means people in non-nerd industries are looking at it. That means its getting really big!

    --
    --
    The last digit of pi is four.
  83. Slashdot rendering warrants "MAJOR BUG" status(?) by Not+Public · · Score: 5, Interesting

    check it out.. the rendering of the left column of Slashdot has been corrected in this release,
    as noted under "Major Bug Fixes" #217527

    I don't know how I feel about that
    or what that says about the prominence of /.
    or what that says about the priorities of the moz devs
    ...I'm so conflicted.

  84. Favicons? by TrentL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know this is a minor point, but will they ever get favicons working correctly? These are the icons that appear next to your bookmarks. They're very useful when they actually work.

    1. Re:Favicons? by Sunspire · · Score: 1

      They seem to be fixed in 1.0PR:

      - The favicons are now stored in the bookmarks file. Previously if the browser crashed the favicons would disappear (as they were stored in the browser cache), not so anymore. This also means that with a little editing you can assign custom favicons to sites that don't usually have an icon.
      - Favicons no longer get assigned to the wrong bookmarks.

      That fixes about all the issues I had with them.

      --
      It's like deja vu all over again.
    2. Re:Favicons? by jimwelch · · Score: 0

      My favorite bug too.
      The whole purpose of a GUI is to use grahics and get rid of text when not needed.

      --
      Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
    3. Re:Favicons? by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1
      I know this is a minor point, but will they ever get favicons working correctly?

      It is not only corrected (as stated in the release notes), but I can also confirm that it now works.

      However, for the layout bug affecting Slashdot...

    4. Re:Favicons? by TrentL · · Score: 1

      Awesome. I wasn't going to upgrade just yet, but now I think I will.

  85. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 0, Redundant

    yes, but OO.o is not the only app out there.

    Anyway, try the extendedPDF macro for OpenOffice - if you want something more like the Acrobat plugin for Word.

  86. Still no system address book support on OS X by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, Thunderbird is useless to me on OS X until it can use the system address book.

    I can't find it at the moment, but there is a long-standing bug about this issue with lots of votes. What it comes down to is that Thunderbird has an address querying interface that is used for LDAP, and the OS X address book is queryable, but no one has connected the dots yet. :(

  87. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    funny thing is that this is one of the reasons i started going out with my girlfriend, because she used mozilla (though I have since converted her to firefox) and hated IE.

    yeah, I find the anti-microsoft sentiment attractive, so what?

  88. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Right.. download OOo, convert all current documents, JUST to create a PDF?

    or

    download a simple PDF creater drinter driver, whcih works with *ANY* program that can print

    Come on, I know you like Open Office, but if your dont want to be marked redundant, give the answer to the RIGHT question.

    --
    Have a nice day!
  89. It works if you use FTP instead of HTTP by cyxxon · · Score: 1

    It might be that you tried (as I did first) the link http://ftp.mozilla.org/... - which does not work.

    I do not know how they set up the http interface (?) to their ftp server, but try using ftp instead. For me it did the trick. Someplace else I read it might be because using http for this enables the mozilla mirroring system, and the file might not yet be on all the mirrors...

    Try it here.

  90. Re:you dont even need to install... its plain zip by EnglishTim · · Score: 0

    Does your parents know you're using the internet unattended?

    Don't you have some homework to do?

  91. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by galaga79 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to think PDF Creator was fantastic, but when I tried deploying in the office it had problems I hadn't encoutered in my limited use of it.

    The worst of these was in the save dialog where if you clicked on a directory shortcut - to jump to a directory - it would save over the shortcut instead of opening the directory. The sad thing is I reported this bug over two months ago, and it still hasn't got fixed.

    In the end I went with the free but non-open source alternative of CutePDF

  92. mozilla browser vs firefox by raffe · · Score: 1

    Whats is the differecne between the mozilla browser (not suite!) and firefox?
    Except differnt gui what else?

    1. Re:mozilla browser vs firefox by keeleysam · · Score: 2, Informative

      The regular Mozilla is MUCH more stable. What i do fro myself and my users, is download the FULL Mozilla 1.7 package, and install the browser only. This way, mailto: links will go to my Gmail account (I have the Gmail Notifier), and for people that use Outlook, their mailto: link work too. I really don't like Firefox, as it isnt stable for me, and the GUI looks like a Jelly-Bean IE.

      --
      Nothing for you to see here, Please move along.
  93. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by geordie_loz · · Score: 0

    you can set to open links by default in new windows or tabs (i think). but as you say, tabs are hidden, except for the "Open Bookmarks in Tabs".. which is one of the cool features, enabling a whole collection of bookmarks to be loaded in one.

  94. written from 1.0pr by 241comp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, I'm writing this from 1.0pr and I must say that it's pretty decent. It does seem to have rather serious problems with Terminal Services though. The only theme that is half-way usable via WTS is the default. All the button backgrounds are black and with some themes, all the menus are black with black text. Ugh - please, someone think of us TS users!

  95. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by ceeam · · Score: 2

    People can live without that. Now, mouse gestures...!

  96. Mozilla are paying $500 bug bounty!!!!!!!! by pflodo · · Score: 1

    When an Open Source organisation can give away money for each security bug and not go broke you might even be able to convince the bean counters in _your_ organisation from a pure security viewpoint...
    First Security Bug Bounty Payments Awarded

    I wonder if Microsoft will match the bounty...they could of course easily afford it, even though there would be a queue to collect money for IE security bugs.

  97. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by baeksu · · Score: 1

    yes yes, IE sucks. But what I really would want is for Mozilla to reach the same level of usability as Opera.

    I switched from Opera to Mozilla recently mostly because Opera wasn't free, and I got tired of using illegal serials to get rid of that damn banner.

    There's a lot of things done better in Mozilla through extensions. I love the ad-blocking filters and the cookie control, but there's just some small things that many times make me want to go back to that big 'O'.

    The tabbed browsing isn't really working so well (or maybe I'm too dumb to figure it out). For one, am I really forced to press ctrl to stop links from opening in a new window? And those links that use a new window, there's really no way to keep them in tabs? So after some surfing I end up with one main window with lotsa tabs and a few seperate windows with single tabs. That is not very user-friendly.

    It's these little things that annoyed me at the beginning. I'm sure for those coming from IE-land it's all just improvements, but I couldn't help wonder how unorganized (and fugly, really) Mozilla still is. It is improving all the time, and that is probably the main reason I decided to invest my time in using it. I really hope that Mozilla will soon start competing against other properly developed browsers and not just the sad IE-experience.

    --
    Gnome: A never ending quest to make unix friendly to people who don't want unix and excruciating for those that do.
  98. This is fixed in the gecko trunk plus a workaround by oldosadmin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey, it's fixed in the trunk. I believe the fix will be in 1.0 final.

    Until then, just resize the font on the page when it renders badly... and boom! fixed!

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
  99. Thunderbird RSS reader, where? by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1
    Thunderbird now features a built in RSS reader which allows you to easily subscribe to and read news and weblogs that support RSS.

    Maybe it has one, but it is so well hidden that I can't find it!

    BTW Firefox also has an RSS reader, not counting the Sage extension...

    1. Re:Thunderbird RSS reader, where? by Sunspire · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You've got add it yourself. Choose Tools->Account settings->Add Account->RSS News & Blogs.

      I think that's just stupid, there's no excuse for not including this "account" by default. There's not even anything you can configure in the Add Account step, you've just got to confirm it.

      On the other hand they still include crap like "Local Folders", even though there's a million dupes in Bugzilla with pleas to get rid of it. I mean what the heck are you even supposed to do with those? The only reason they can't be removed, as explained to me by a developer, is because Thunderbird depends on them for many background tasks even if you never store a single message in them. Nice job of separating the backend from the interface there...

      Though I bitch, I still love Thunderbird. The UI is getting a bit bloated though (I mean do you really need a Javascript console in a mail application, what a waste of a menu entry position)

      --
      It's like deja vu all over again.
    2. Re:Thunderbird RSS reader, where? by thegnu · · Score: 0

      I mean what the heck are you even supposed to do with those?

      If you configure Thunderbird to use your AOL email account, you still don't download the messages. You also can't write to the server, so you need a place to store your messages locally.

      Maybe they should remove it by default and have an option to add it. Or have the local folders visible/invisible in View menu. But there is at least 1 valid reason for it.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    3. Re:Thunderbird RSS reader, where? by rdnk · · Score: 1
      You've got add it yourself. Choose Tools->Account settings->Add Account->RSS News & Blogs.

      Great that TB now includes RSS reader, I've always thought the email/news-reader application is the more correct place for reading the feeds. What does everyone think, is the Thunderbird or the Firefox the right place for reading RSS feeds?

      OTOH, I'm testing the Firefox RSS reader as well, but I don't like the way the bookmarks sidebar eats the space from the main window. Much better place for it seems to be the Bookmarks toolbar.

      We'll see...

  100. Re:This is fixed in the gecko trunk plus a workaro by edremy · · Score: 1

    Until then, just resize the font on the page when it renders badly... and boom! fixed!

    Umm, no. This fixes some of the more obvious errors, but not the complete blank screens and black-on-black text persist through all sorts of changes.

    Someone needs to give Taco a boot to the head every day until he fixes this.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  101. textzoom.override.enable ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone get a Dialog box popping up everytime you launch a new window, "textzoom.override.enable" with the only option "ok"

    I've searched about:config with no luck. Disabled all extentions too..

  102. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    With the new additions to Thunderbird I can finally convert over to it from Outlook. *However* make sure you set aside a good few hours for this task if you're like me and have many many emails.

    At present the import wizard is attempting to umm... import my stuff from Outlook, but I'm guessing it's not liking my 37k+ emails too much - one hour in and the progress bar isn't even at 1/4.

    Oh and a gripe about the latest Firefox - it's acting a bit 'odd' with compatible extensions and themes. Attempting to install the updates I get "invalid jar bla bla bla." After a few attempts it typically works, but that's more of an annoyance than is really necessary.

    After all this is done I guess I'll check out Mozilla Suite. Any views on this package?

  103. A workaround... by spinlocked · · Score: 1
    Rather than reloading 2 or 3 times, do:
    <ctrl>- <ctrl>+
    Reducing then enlarging the font size seems to give 0.9.3 the kick it needs to render the page properly. Well, it works for me anyway...

    Haven't had it happen yet in 1.0PR, so fingers crossed.
    --
    # init 5
    Connection closed.


    Oh... ...bugger.
  104. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by jonhaug · · Score: 1

    I am really impressed, as it is the first time I convert someone over 30.

    In some sense, I think the 20-50 are the most difficult to convert, because they think that any criticism against Microsoft is an offense to their manhood.

    Those above 50, on the other hand, do connect their choices like that.

    (Just a guess. :-))

  105. Thunderbird... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since I got a Gmail account I open Tbird maybe three times a week to see if I forgot to forward anything important to it...

    The main problem I have in converting people to Tbird is that it has no support for outlook, Yahoo or MSN. And yes, I am aware there are programs to do it, but having to say "Well, NO it doesnt check yahoo, but you can download and configure this other little program to make it work" really doesn't present it in a flattering light.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:Thunderbird... by arafel · · Score: 1

      Are there other mail programs that check both Yahoo and MSN?

      Not entirely sure what you meant by "no support for outlook". :-)

    2. Re:Thunderbird... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Oops, meant Hotmail (Serves me right for posting early in the morning)

      And not mail programs, per se, but you can download "helper" apps that query Hotmail MSN and Yahoo and present the mail to thunderbird via a mini POP3 server (hotmail Popper at www.boolean.ca is one such)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:Thunderbird... by arafel · · Score: 1

      Yep, I gathered that - I was just wondering which mail programs could actually collect mail from both of those sources without any helpers? There has to be one that can do it in order for Thunderbird to come off badly, you see. :-)

      You could always write extensions to query the mail servers... I doubt the Thunderbird authors would include Hotmail/Yahoo into the main code base, simply because it's going to be too fragile. (Disclaimer: I'm not a Thunderbird author.)

    4. Re:Thunderbird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I used to use those, but they never quite worked right (every once in awhile they would stop deleting mail from the server when they were done, so I'd end up with new dupes whenver it checked the server.) But that was all before I abandoned my hotmail and yahoo accounts to the spam demons.

    5. Re:Thunderbird... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Well fragility aside, I'm under the impression it's not added in due to possible legality issues.

      As for which other programs work, I'm not sure. Outlook in all it's flavors, of course, and maybe Eudora?
      Really the way I see it, there just has to be one mail program (outlook) which comes on everyone's computer that can do it in order for Tbird to come off badly

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    6. Re:Thunderbird... by arafel · · Score: 1

      Don't really see why it would be illegal to access your own webmail

      Outlook can access Yahoo webmail? When did it start being able to do that...?

    7. Re:Thunderbird... by ceplinboston · · Score: 1

      Is it just me (or am I spoiled from Linux and KMail) but it seems to me that TB whenever I have to try it (getting into Windows wilderness) sucks roaylly. Especially working offline/online makes me cry every other time I try it (and I thought offline IMAP in KMail is experimental). Just today I removed all remnants of TB from my wife's Win computer and switched to putty with mutt, isync, leafnode, and slrn, because the instability of TB was just something I did not want to fight with.

      Moreover, when trying to find a bug on bugzilla, I found bugs which seemed rather severe to me (potentially loosing mail) and there was not much development on them in last three years!! Wov! And I thought that there are too many bugs for KMail.

      No, thanks.

      Matej

    8. Re:Thunderbird... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      It's not the access, its the fact that hotmail uses nonstandard HTTP mail methods (from what i gather) that would have to be reverse-engineered to make it work, and most likely would have to be continually re-worked much the same way Trillian does to keep in line with changes in the system. This is from reading the Thunderbird forums and the question gets posed quite often (I'm surprised there ISN"T an extension yet, but apparently no one who's interested has the skill)

      And, my mistake on Yahoo, I forgot they made you pay for POP rather than HTTP access a la hotmail

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  106. Installed --and now it won't start by khendron · · Score: 1

    I just installed Firefox 1.0PR on two of my W2K computers. Now Firefox will not start on either system. Instead I get the error "Java plug-in for Netscape Navigator should not be used in Microsoft Internet Explorer. Please use Java plug-in for Microsoft Internet Explorer instead."

    WTF?

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    1. Re:Installed --and now it won't start by pspmikek · · Score: 1

      Interesting. It sounds like you have your browser configured to pretend it is internet explorer? Java doesn't like that....

      did you install it over an existing firefox?

      Did it migrate settings from another browser?

    2. Re:Installed --and now it won't start by khendron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Figured out the problem. It was the User Agent Switcher plug-in. It was set to IE, which caused FF to get bongled when loading the java plug-in.

      To fix: go into prefs.js and set the general.useragent.override to an empty string. This will allow FF to start.

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    3. Re:Installed --and now it won't start by permaculture · · Score: 1

      I installed 1.0PR, it wouldn't appear when run, so I reverted to v0.9. Now It won't install adblock or any other extensions.

      Anyone else got the same symptoms?

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
  107. Source ? by Tom · · Score: 1

    Where do I get the Firefox source? I need to compile it for a specific environment here where the builds don't work. But the only mention of source on the firefox page is "cvs". Not that I couldn't check it out, but they could at least tell me how the trunk and the 2 modules are CALLED instead of just vaguely referencing them. Argh.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:Source ? by Tom · · Score: 1

      Answering my own question, thanks to searching, random luck and a guy at the forums, the source is here:

      http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/r el eases/0.10/

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  108. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by tolan-b · · Score: 5, Informative

    I disagree. Whenever I introduce someone (mostly people who only use their computer when they have to) to Firefox, I always tae a minut or two to explain tabbed browsing, and turn off auto-scroll so they can middle click to open links in a new tab.

    So far they've all raved about tabbed browsing once they've used FF for a bit.

  109. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which confusing bugs are you thinking of?

  110. What about 10.3? by Daniel+Ellard · · Score: 1
    The system requirements for these packages lists MacOS 10.1 and 10.2, but doesn't mention 10.3. Are there any glitches with 10.3? Why isn't it on the blessed list?

    --
    Disclaimer: I work for a company, but I don't speak for them.
  111. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Red+Alastor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, there is a way. It is called the Single Window extension. Makes link unable to open new windows by themselves (open in tabs, as you wished) but *you* can still right click and chose to open in a new window.

    --
    Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
  112. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll second CutePDF. It's been good quality and I haven't noticed bugs. I deployed it on a couple machines here at work, although the boss doesn't like it because we standardized on Adobe Acrobat (which I'll admit has more features) and he doesn't want to support two applications (CutePDF needs no support - it just works). So instead, the departments just send us all their documents because they don't want to pay for an Adobe license :P

  113. Re:0.9 0.10? by noselasd · · Score: 1

    Over here comma is used as a separator, I usually don't think
    of 0.9 as a decimal number ;)

  114. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1
    There's a lot of things done better in Mozilla through extensions.

    Too bad that upgrading Firefox to this release means throwing all your extensions away. They're not compatible.

    For one, am I really forced to press ctrl to stop links from opening in a new window?

    Middle clicking will open links in a new tab.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
  115. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...desktop-global bookmarks sidebar....

    Already there in both XP and KDE. However, you need to use the native browser :(

    XP:
    1) Right-click on your main taskbar.
    2) Click "New Toolbar"
    3) Point it to your "Favourites" folder
    4) Done (Oups, requires IE ;-)

    KDE supports this via a native applet for Konqueror (beats Firefox on Linux I think).

  116. s/Does/Do/ by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    Whoops.

  117. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

    I find explaining in detail all the spyware stuff that was installed via IE.

    Most common in the machines I have fixed is Horse Dialler and varitions of.

    The people whos machine I have fixed, still use modem and are able to equate the damage to real world money on their phone bill.

    One of them had over 300 euros to a number in Nigeria which was most likely the dialer program. They had been arguing with their phone provider for some time claiming they never called the number.

  118. Firefox search bar by oojah · · Score: 1

    I use Mozilla by preference. One of the reasons I don't use Firefox is the search toolbar - in my opinion there is no need for a seperate toolbar.

    Is there any way to have Firefox do searches from the url bar like in Mozilla?

    Cheers,

    Roger

    --
    Do you have any better hostages?
    1. Re:Firefox search bar by Sunspire · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep. By default when you enter something in the url bar that is not a site it will do a "I'm feeling lucky" search on Google.

      If you don't want this and prefer to get the full Google results instead, open the url about:config. Type "keyword.URL" into the filter box, and change the value to "http://www.google.com/search?btnG=Google+Search&q =" (there's no space in there, Slashdot inserts it). That should do the trick. You can of course change the url to be whatever search engine you prefer.

      Another neat trick is setting up keywords. By creating a bookmark and adding a keyword to it, the %s part of a bookmark will be replaced with whatever is in the url bar at the moment. That way you can set up custom searches for IMDB, Google Groups, Google News, Wikipedia, etc. After that, searching Wikipedia as an example is as easy as entering "w sometopic" in the url bar. I've got a whole slew of keywords for doing online translations between different languages, dictionary lookups etc.

      --
      It's like deja vu all over again.
    2. Re:Firefox search bar by oojah · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      Fantastic, that works nicely.

      Keywords are indeed neat. Another feature I can't live without :)

      Cheers,

      Roger

      --
      Do you have any better hostages?
    3. Re:Firefox search bar by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      fyi, there is "hide searchbar" plugin and it is compatible with 1.0

    4. Re:Firefox search bar by oojah · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I've misunderstood, but why would I need to do that? I can't comment on versions 1.0PR but I've just customised the toolbars and dragged the searchbar away from the toolbar and into the toolbar "palette" thing.

      Does that make sense?

      Cheers,

      Roger

      --
      Do you have any better hostages?
  119. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

    Hi my name's Chris and I've been using Internet Explorer for 2 years.

    --
    Nothing costs nothing
  120. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by jd142 · · Score: 1

    As a 36 year old, I resent the implication that we're all old fogeys. ;)

  121. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

    And THEN, convert every single web site out there that runs ASP.NET and/or exclusively fro the IE browser.

    (Don't get me wrong, I and all my family run Firefox, and I've already converted two in my workplace)

    --
    Sig it.
  122. Too many moving parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, let's see, you need a service pack, three proglets and a third-party browser modification, all of which you have to keep updated, all of which you must be concerned over for future compatibility with future Windows and IE mods OR you can download Firefox/Mozilla and have none of those concerns? Seems like an easy answer to me: my time should be spent using my computer not fighting to update it.

    1. Re:Too many moving parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "my time should be spent using my computer not fighting to update it." Sounds like just the reason many people (not slashdot readers) avoid linux like the plague...

    2. Re:Too many moving parts by moultano · · Score: 1

      Exactly

    3. Re:Too many moving parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you ever touched linux? I haven't done a single update on my linux system besides the auto-update it did when I first installed. This is since I bought a new computer a few months ago. On Windows I had to sit through 5+ reboots with separate update downloads (so many things must be downloaded seperately), and have had to download+install+reboot for at least 3-5 more updates since then.

      For games I'm stuck with Windows, but for real security and getting real work done, it's all about linux. SOOO many fewer hassles than windows, and so many more choices.

    4. Re:Too many moving parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you only need one of the three.

      XP SP2 adds an ad blocker
      Google Toolbar adds an ad blocker
      Admuncher adds an ad blocker

      English not your first language, or you just don't take to reading?

    5. Re:Too many moving parts by pivo · · Score: 1

      to update fedora: "yum update"

      boy, that was a struggle.

    6. Re:Too many moving parts by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that Gecko provides proper PNG support, as well as better / according-to-standards CSS support.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    7. Re:Too many moving parts by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > my time should be spent using my computer not fighting to update it

      Yes, and we all know how easy it is to get the latest Firefox binary releases
      running on a Gnome1 system. All you need is GTK2. And the five or six libs
      that requires. And the things they require, including newer versions of some
      core C libraries that are incompatible with the rest of your system... why do
      you think I'm still using SeaMonkey/Navigator at work? At home I have the
      luxury of doing things like spending fifteen hours updating to a newer version
      of my distribution and getting that configured into a usable state, then
      fiddling endlessly for two weeks to *try* to get Gnome2 up to the standard
      of functionality of Gnome1, only to find out that's really totally impossible.
      At work, I really don't have time for that.

      None of this is Mozilla.org's fault, mind you (except maybe the part about
      there being no prebuilt Firefox binaries for Gnome1), but it's a pain anyway.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    8. Re:Too many moving parts by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      Right, like the sorority-sister-with-a-Compaq is going to remember to open up a console, switch to root, and type 'yum update' with any regularity.

      XP has it right with its auto-update stuff. Fortunately, so do most desktop distros (e.g. Linspire).

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    9. Re:Too many moving parts by pivo · · Score: 1

      oh, then she could just click the update notification icon at button at the screen. Linux is now easier to update than windows, and you ususally don't need to reboot.

    10. Re:Too many moving parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same people that won't run Windows update because "I don't want anyone installing anything on my PC!" With Fedora it's simple, with Windows it's intrusive. You can't have it both ways.

    11. Re:Too many moving parts by Draknor · · Score: 1

      So, uh, you run IE on your Gnome1 system instead?

      The GP was comparing running Firefox vs IE/Avant/XP SP2/Ad-blocker software, on Windows. Clearly, Firefox is easier to install & use. The fact that Firefox binary releases don't work well on a Gnome1 system is completely irrelevant.

      At least you were nice enough to not completely blame Mozilla.org :)

    12. Re:Too many moving parts by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > So, uh, you run IE on your Gnome1 system instead?

      No, silly, I'm using SeaMonkey.

      > The GP was comparing running Firefox vs IE/Avant/XP SP2/Ad-blocker software,
      > on Windows.

      Yes, but I was pointing out that Windows isn't the only system you ever have
      to fight to update. I loathe Windows, don't get me wrong, but I prefer to
      criticize it for things it does wrong that the competition gets right.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  123. Aspx by Skrekkur · · Score: 1

    This seems to be nice step in firefox development, but some evil aspx sites, refuse to work properly even now. Still even if one has to use IE from time to time, Firefox is definetly worth it ;)

    1. Re:Aspx by Skrekkur · · Score: 1

      I might add that asp and aspx that dont work in firefox work in opera :/

  124. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IE doesn't block all the pop ups. I've got some spy ware on my system at work (i inherited it) that AdAware can't remove. This bugger is allowing some of the pop ups through. I'm glad to be seeing only 2 or 3 pop ups a day now instead of the 20 - 30.

  125. It's definately better but.... by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    The GUI lacks harmonisation, some buttons slab when you move the pointer over, some change color, and some don't do anything at all but are still clickable, I'm not sure about these red dots while images load, the HTTPS yellow navigation bar is novel but lacks clarity, and seems to stay yellow for a while during the loading of a second website.

    Lots of work to do to pull all these new featues into one good looking browser.

    But it's nice to have mozilla update working :)

  126. Enable "Find as you type" by bahwi · · Score: 1

    And you'll never have to click "Edit->Find" again or even Ctrl-F. You just start typing and it starts searching. I've been using this feature for awhile. Got a build for my P4 from http://www.moox.ws/tech/mozilla/ The end-user in my likes the Mozilla of it, and the geek in me loves the P4 optimizations of it. =)

    1. Re:Enable "Find as you type" by Sunspire · · Score: 1

      To add to this, to really get most out of the feature use following keyboard shortcuts:

      / (slash): Starts the find as you type feature, if you haven't enabled it to be active all the time in the options.

      ' (apostrophe): Starts find as you type, but only searches links. This is incredibly useful for very fast keyboard browsing.

      control-g: Highlight and jump to the next match.

      --
      It's like deja vu all over again.
    2. Re:Enable "Find as you type" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      control-g: Highlight and jump to the next match.

      F3 also does this. Add shift to the keystrokes and the search goes backwards. (Shift+Ctrl+G and Shift+F3)

  127. My FF & TB Experience thus far by airjrdn · · Score: 1

    I've been using TB for a short time and converted my Mother over also.

    I'd been using PopFile with OE and to be honest, it was better at determining what was junk mail and what wasn't. I'm hoping TB gets better over more time.

    I'm using a nightly build so I can have one inbox for multiple accounts, and I'm sure it hasn't been full tested, but so far some other things I'm not crazy about are:

    Date sorting doesn't seem to work correctly

    Upon starting I often get a message about the folder not being done processing yet (and I haven't clicked anything)

    Junk mail classification isn't overly great after a couple months of training..PopFile seemed to get better faster

    Can't search subject & body in one search

    Need 3rd party backup/restore


    Firefox

    I really like it once I get it tweaked, I've had to put together a step by step process to get it that way, too bad I can't simply bundle those steps together and automate them

    Need 3rd party backup/restore

    Some sites still don't render quite right

    It bombs MUCH more than IE did :( Note that this is on a clean XP install and the only application that bombs

    Need a "New Tab From Clipboard" button

    Copy/Paste in the address bar seems not to work sometimes..haven't nailed this one down yet

    Using Squirrelmail, IE put me at the beginning of the box w/the domain name following. FF puts me at the end of the domain name where I have to hit HOME then type in my username

    I know these are mostly minor annoyances, but still, they bug me nonetheless.

  128. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by carlos_benj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd actually recommend turning off tabs, just because the newbies will probably be less likely to use Firefox if they have to deal with tabs since it's something different than they're used to.

    So far, everyone I've shown tabs to was at least intrigued if not downright ecstatic.

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  129. Thanks much! by Rooktoven · · Score: 1

    Command line ftp lead me to a mirror that hadn't been updated.

    --

    Acquiescence leads to obliteration
  130. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Spoing · · Score: 4, Interesting
    1. I am really impressed, as it is the first time I convert someone over 30.

    I've had no problem with my parents (both almost 70). Here's what I did;

    1. Watched what sites they would go to in IE.
    2. Asked them if there were any others.
    3. Installed Firefox (actually, the older version when it was named Phoenix!).
    4. Loaded the sites they visit in bookmarks.
    5. Set the default home page to load all of those sites in tabs.

      A bonus was pointing out that popup blocking is included.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  131. mickey mouse. by vena · · Score: 5, Insightful

    first, i love firefox, it's a wonderful product.

    but i still have to uninstall before upgrading on many of the machines here, and it's ridiculous now to call this a 1.0PR with that problem still around.

    also, from the release notes:

    It should not be necessary to create a new profile when you upgrade from a previous version of Firefox providing you do disable all extensions from the prior version before upgrading. To do this, open the old version and open Tools > Options and click the Extensions panel. Click on each of the extensions listed and choose Disable Extension. Click OK to close the Options window. Now it is safe to install Firefox.

    if you know this is the case, mister firefox, why the hell does your installer not do it for me?

    you want mass adoption, but you continue with this mickey mouse crap of not being able to handle upgrades in any sort of efficient manor. i'm sorry, but you won't see mass adoption like that, and i'm afraid you've already gained the reputation.

    1. Re:mickey mouse. by BigJimSlade · · Score: 3, Informative

      if you know this is the case, mister firefox, why the hell does your installer not do it for me?

      My installer on Windows *did* do this for me. I completely forgot to disable my extensions, but it told me X, Y, and Z extensions were not going to work and would be disabled automatically. Maybe that snippit from the release notes was just blindly pasted in from a previous release?

    2. Re:mickey mouse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I just upgraded from 0.9.3 and it did exactly what you said it should do. It disabled the extensions which would have problems, looked for extension updates, installed them and then ran. Very cool. (I'm on Windows though, I donno what will happen on Linux)

    3. Re:mickey mouse. by vena · · Score: 1

      that's great, and on your advice i rolled back a few test boxes and tried it out.

      unfortunately, it seems to have a similar problem as overwriting a previous installation - it works at random.

      so apparently it *is* in the release notes for a reason.

  132. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    How is IE blocking tabs?

    Concerning pop-up blocking, one concerning thing is that Microsoft has documented a way for the server to detect whether a particular pop-up has been blocked. Some more sites might try to restrict content unless you allow pop-ups.

    Adblock and Flashblock are nice though. While a lot of features can be put into IE, the problem is the software used to implement it is either more trouble, cost money or bloated, whereas tiny, no-cost extensions for the Mozilla core can do the job better.

  133. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Adam9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recently started working at the Support Desk at school, and sometimes there are some obscure problems with MSIE that we just can't work out over the phone. We usually have them install Firefox, and sometimes I have people install Thunderbird if their other mail client is giving them problems (or if they want good spam filtering).

    I haven't had any calls yet this year of people having problems with Firefox.

    Did I mention that Adaware is our savior here too?

  134. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Speaking as a 39 year old geek, I'll have you know not all of us old geezers are totally tech-phobic. In-between our Geritol and AARP meetings, we still find time to send out an electric mail or two over one of these new-fangled adding machines.

    I remember when we used to send messages with a slide rule. Of course I'd have an onion on my belt while doing it, which was the style at the time. They didn't have white onions because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones...

    --
    He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
  135. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by werwerf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I did this summer. Have "evangelized" (do you say it that way) all my family with great results.

    I started to do it to avoid all the "son, what's that window that appears on my PC?" calls from my mom, but the side effects are just great: faster navigation, more secure PC, less hanging... And for free! :)

    ---
    there was a SIG here.
    it is gone now.

  136. Yahoo.com works by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    it works here. but the about:plugin doesn't.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    1. Re:Yahoo.com works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try about:plugins

  137. cool, but also Evolution 2.0 & gnome 2.8 today by grusapa · · Score: 1

    Evolution 2.0 http://www.novell.com/products/evolution/ and gnome 2.8 its in debian sid :)

  138. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by baeksu · · Score: 1

    Thank you. That's annoyance fixed, several to go...

    --
    Gnome: A never ending quest to make unix friendly to people who don't want unix and excruciating for those that do.
  139. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by philwx · · Score: 0

    Tabs rule! For side by side comparison of information there is no equal.

  140. Ggo and vote for this bug by eldacan · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124750

  141. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    You might have to wait a little bit for that "stable" 1.0 release. I've been using 0.9x for quite a while, but since installing 1.0 I haven't even been able to get Firefox to launch! I'll head over to their support page and see what's going on, but this isn't a good sign...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  142. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by iabervon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember to go to about:config and set "keyword:confusing_bugs" to false.

  143. How to advocate tabbed browsing by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Be sure to show newbies how to use tabs and find-as-you-type! IE will soon be blocking popups.

    Most people have a hard time "getting" tabbed browsing -- what it is, and why it's so amazing -- because the idea of tabs is pretty abstract if you haven't used them before. So relate it to something the average Joe Windows has used: tabs in MS Excel workbooks. I recently switched my (non-techie) sister to Firefox for increased security, and when I tried to show her tabbed browsing, her eyes completely glazed over. Then it hit her -- "it's like having tabs for the different sheets in an Excel workbook!" -- and she instantly thought it was the coolest thing since sliced bread. (Even the Ctrl-PgUp/PgDn shortcut keys are the same.)

    Cheers,
    IT

    --

    Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

    1. Re:How to advocate tabbed browsing by bmalia · · Score: 1

      All too familiar with that glazed over look. I'll have to remember that MS Excel analogy!

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    2. Re:How to advocate tabbed browsing by kcb93x · · Score: 1

      Most understand it...I explain it like this:

      I open one of my sites, like a news site for example (I show them as I do this) and I can scroll down and when I see a cool article, I just middle-click on it, and it starts to load it in the background. It lets me keep everything organized - all the pages from one site are in one window, plus it's faster than opening a new window.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:How to advocate tabbed browsing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then it hit her -- "it's like having tabs for the different sheets in an Excel workbook!" -- and she instantly thought it was the coolest thing since sliced bread.

      But-but-but how can it be similar to tabs in Excel? Excel's tabs are at the bottom of the screen, and Firefox's tabs are at the top! That's like totally different!

      (Sounds silly? Not when you consider that I had my grandmother on the phone the other day in a panic because she'd "done something" in Word and suddenly it had a gray bit around the text... yup, she couldn't cope with the difference between Normal and Page Layout view.)

  144. Old feature - Save Link To Disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened to the Save Link To Disk option?

    I still use 0.7 on my laptop because it makes saving multiple links so much quicker. I don't have to open up each page in a new tab, then click save link as, then close the tab.

  145. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that I'd ever go back, but when I did use IE, the google toolbar worked great for blocking popups. At the same time, I don't know how I would have lived without it.

    Also, I believe the new version of IE that ships with XP SP2 was supposed to have a popup blocker. I've never actually bothered testing for myself though.

    To me, The selling point of firefox is in the extensions. There are all kinds of great things you can add to the browser. To name a couple, I love mouse gestures and I love being able to right click on words and do a search or looup a definition. Tabs are tons easier to deal with than sepperate windows as well.

    Now if only /. would display properly...

  146. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by sat1308 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok I'm 15 and I've been using Firefox for like an year now.

    I have IE 6 on my computer too but I never use it. I've already converted three of my friends to Firefox, they aren't power users or anything, they don't know jack about computers...

    On the other when I tried to convince my Dad (he's a web-developer, 44 yrs)to switch to Firefox, he's like no way (!) - Firefox is still in beta and unreliable, unstable blah blah blah... (BTW, this was before he had used it)

    I showed him all the cool features like find as you type, google search built-in to the toolbar, tabbed browsing, popup blocker, adblock...the works.

    I really can't see why my dad doesn't use firefox. I showed one of my relatives Firefox too, but he wasn't too interested - even though he had reformatted his HDD twice or thrice cuz of spyware and scum coming in thru IE. So yes converting someone over 30 is damn hard even if they despise spyware.

    I'd like to hear from fellow slashdotters if they've faced similar problems in converting people to firefox.

    Really, the state of computer literacy, at least in India (my friends in the US say its equally bad there) is really appalling, and I'm talking about well-educated,smart people not the poor people. I mean look at my Dad he's really smart, he graduated from the top colleges in India and still never bothered to install a firewall on our computer even though we have ADSL, doesn't want to use stuff like Firefox...

    Basically converting people to firefox or linux is hard for two reasons - people are averse to change and mainly because most people are stupid.

    P.S - I know somebody in my family who put a folder named 'sex' on the fucking Desktop, it had loads of porn, about a gig, and he has two kids (10 & 13).

  147. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by jordand · · Score: 5, Informative

    and turn off auto-scroll so they can middle click to open links in a new tab.

    Just FYI, you don't need to disable auto-scroll. The middle click is context sensitive, and will open tabs on links.

    --
    .sigh
  148. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by rabbit994 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    SP2 also isn't mass deployed at least to those I talked to. I'm on Windows XP (I'm gamer leave me alone) and I haven't deployed SP2. Many people I know have passed on SP2 because they have heard bad things (mainly) or don't want to download it (just adding excuses). Everyone I know runs Firefox, Firebird or something similar. (I know for fact I have a few Firebird .7 still out there)

    Lately, more and more screen shots I've seen on people desktops and of internet have included firefox in some form. I've also converted people who install Avant to their system. Avant is great but can be unstable and when I can give them a browser who doesn't do ActiveX and isn't some hack for already screwed up browser, I'm happy. Firefox is making leaps and bounds and it's user base is growing. Microsoft knows it. Why else would SP2 include some "security" updates? Also, why run Admuncher or Adblock which is eating additional RAM and is just more shit to go wrong?

    Real question is.... Have you converted today?

  149. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by vgaphil · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You can export files into PDF with OpenOffice too.

    --
    A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
  150. Re:Slashdot rendering warrants "MAJOR BUG" status( by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it just means that the Slashdot bug is a symptom of a larger problem?

    --

    The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
    --Aristotle
  151. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    I'm 45. I've been using Free software for 20 years.

    What is this "Microsoft" of which you speak?

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  152. Sunbird has a new Build by spin2cool · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The calendar project (aka Sunbird) got a new build the other day too. It's still in 2.0, but is very stable in my experience, and features are being added rapidly. http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/

    1. Re:Sunbird has a new Build by spin2cool · · Score: 1

      Err... meant to say it's in its 0.2 build. My bad.

  153. University of Guelph now using Firefox by deviantonline · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Went back to school yesterday and to my delight discovered that the University of Guelph is now running Firefox on its computer systems!

  154. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Database is not availiable", whatever that means.

  155. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

    I try and try, but my "friends" think outlook/IE are the greatest pieces of software ever.

    Maybe when their system gets infected by a bug or their credit card number stolen because of those app's huge security holes, maybe they'll switch...

    --
    100% Insightful
  156. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by hackwrench · · Score: 2, Informative

    Download a bho remover http://www.computing.net/windowsme/wwwboard/forum/ 43535.html use msconfig, look in task manager, or use sysinternal's procexp, and you should be able to remove it yourself http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/procexp .shtml

    Startup Control Panel
    http://www.mlin.net/StartupCPL.shtml

  157. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by bryanp · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a 36 year old, I resent the implication that we're all old fogeys. ;)

    As someone who will be 36 in 16 days I have to remind you of something. We are now old enough to legally date women half our age.

    Oh, and in six more years we can buy them drinks. ^_~

    --
    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
  158. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may want to check out CutePDF Writer. Works Fantastic! http://www.acrosoftware.com/Products/CutePDF/write r.asp

  159. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been on the mission for quite a while already. My current list of confirmed converts includes 2 sisters, 1 brother, 1 cousin, 2 ~40-year-old friends of my brother, and an unidentified number or friends (been recommending Firefox to them and eventually many of them have changed, but I can't say for sure if it was because of my recommendations). No complaints yet, and my cousin (who's nearing 40 himself) said that Firefox felt a bit odd at first, but now that he got to used to it, it wipes the floor with IE anytime.

  160. converting by horrens · · Score: 1

    I have been steadily converting people over to firefox, all the computers that I have been fixing get firefox and thunderbird, everyone is happy sofar the biggerst problem I had was with my gf, we had a big fight over me not wanting her using ie on my computer, but the next day she took a closer look at it and now wouldn't want to use anything else the bigges selling point for her was the skins

  161. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by DCheesi · · Score: 1

    Pop-up blocking, annoyance killing is *the* selling point of firefox. I didn't knew how fucked was ie browsing until I talked with this guy. The web was becoming useless for him, and he was driven crazy by frustration.

    Unfortunately, it's no longer completely effective; the browser-spammers have learned how to get around the popup blocker. I've had more popups in the last week than I have since switching to Firefox months ago.

  162. Re:Slashdot rendering warrants "MAJOR BUG" status( by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The larger problem is that so many sites are still in the stone ages of html 3.2.

    Ouch.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  163. just updated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on my linux desktop machine - workin great so far.

    off to rtfa now and see whats added..

  164. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by avdp · · Score: 1

    ASP.NET is a server-side scripting language. There is no reason why it would cause a web page not to work with Firefox (other than the usual poor web developer syndrome that is not really language specific).

  165. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by kwandar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd love to convert a couple of people to Thunderbird at our office, but there is a problem.

    Unfortunately they can't read those stupid "winmail.dat" files that Outlook loves to send out.

    If anyone has a suggestion to allow Thunderbird to automatically read/open these stupid winmail.dat files, I guarantee two new converts, AT LEAST!!!

  166. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by cornjones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OT I know but since we are talking about it. I have a map in MS streets and maps that I want to print really really big. I would like to export a pdf of size 200x160 or whatever that comes out to. I have tried w/ the full acrobat and w/ pdf reader and both croak when dealing w/ that size.

    Anybody have a suggestion for one that can handle it?

    thx
    ej

  167. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "IE will soon be blocking popups."

    Yes, but for how long?

    As far as advertisers are concerned, pop-up blocking in Mozilla and Firefox is a blip on the radar, but any attempt by IE to do the same, because of its market share, will likely be broken within a week.

    Besides, blocking pop-ups is one thing. Using the Adblock extention in Firefox to nuke banner and Flash ads on the side is something else, something I simply don't see IE doing (market pressures from advertisers and Macromedia would stop that if nothing else).

  168. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hah yeah, I know several computer science students who are incredibly offended by linux because they're "too stupid to use it".

    I don't think for a moment they're actually too stupid to use it, they're just too impatient to learn a new system. They'd be having the exact same problem if they had used linux for 15 years and then tried to switch to windows. They're so used to being Mr. Expert at computers they can't take being a newbie and relying on others for help.

  169. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by danharan · · Score: 1

    No tabs? You have a point that it's confusing to add new stuff for people, but in this case there's a clear benefit to using tabs.

    Explain that you can be reading a page and continue reading while the next link loads in another tab. Reference/background articles, picture galleries... tailor the example for the person - I used a google image search of a good-looking singer for a woman who had a crush on him. Worked like a charm!

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  170. Re:Still no MSI package - other Enterprise issues by mgpeter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On most Windows networks that utilize MSI installers Firefox will not work anyway - the reason, Roaming profiles.

    Currently no mozilla based browser will work "automatically" with roaming profiles. What happens is that a user will create his profile on one computer, move to another, then Firefox (Mozilla, Netscape, etc) will continually ask for a profile since it does not find the one that was created previously.

    This is a major stumbling block for Enterprise acceptance of FireFox. Currently you can get around this by specifying a profile in the command line that launches firefox (make a batch file), but unfortunately every user that uses a computer will use the same profile. (Unless you have an extremely fast network and server which can sufficiently serve 100+ profiles at the same time).

    Another complaint I hear from fellow Adminstrators is the fact that you can easily "lock down" Internet Explorer by using Group Policies through Active Directory. Example, you can easily change the home page of every user by simply creating a policy object and applying it to an Active Directory User Container that includes all of your users. To do this with Firefox would take hours (if not days) depending on the number of installations.

  171. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by magefile · · Score: 1

    I did this for my family after our Windows computer wouldn't even boot b/c of spyware (I don't use that computer, or it wouldn't have gotten that far). You can still get to IE through the file-folder interface, but I've removed all its shortcuts. And AOL still uses it, so I've convinced everyone to use AOL for email only (yeah, I know, but since they won't switch ...).

    I also did this at a neighbor's house; he was having virus problems, and was happy to try Firefox, when I told him that it would keep his computer cleaner. I will be making another house call today (different family), and they say IE won't even start, so that's an almost sure convert right there.

  172. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by tntguy · · Score: 4, Informative

    C'mon, go the extra step and link it! :-) And the homepage is here.

  173. Killing Ad ware by kwandar · · Score: 1

    I've found that Spybot Search and Destroy" is actually better than Adaware, though I make no guarantees, and often use both.

    I'd suggest giving it a try as well, though, for those persistent problems.

  174. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by jfengel · · Score: 1

    Hey, thanks! I didn't realize that I could turn that off. I'd been using middle-click but if I missed the link, it autoscrolled. That makes my day.

  175. Any way to save tabs when you exit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to convert me to firefox all you have to do is point me at some way to get firefox to save my opened tabs when i exit (or when it crashes) so i can resume where i left off...

    I can do it in IE and Opera.... but i can't find a firefox plugin for it...

  176. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by GreyPoopon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    is to convert an I.E. / outlook user to Mozilla / Thunderbird today ...

    I've already converted a bunch of them at work. Microsoft made it really easy for me what with all the ActiveX exploits, lack of features updates, etc. The process is always the same:

    COWORKER: My computer is really slow all of the sudden.
    ME: Have you checked for spyware lately? Run Ad-aware and Spybot lately?
    COWORKER: OK...
    ... 30 minutes later ...
    COWORKER: Wow, there sure were a lot of nasties on there. I've removed them all and things are running much faster. Thanks for the tip!

    ... The next day ...

    COWORKER: My PC was slow again this morning, so I ran Ad-aware and Spybot again. They found all sorts of new stuff. Is there any way to keep this from happening?
    ME: There's three ways:

    1. Stay off the internet
    2. Completely customize your security settings on IE for internet zones to disable ActiveX for anything not in your trusted sites list and live with the fact the lots of sites break when they see you have IE and ActiveX doesn't work.
    3. Install Firefox and use that for all your internet browsing and just reserve IE for the local intranet and the few web sites that don't work properly with Firefox.

    COWORKER: Oh, option 3 sounds good. I'll install it right now.

    The good thing is, my upgrade today to Firefox PR1.0 seems to work on a lot of sites that weren't working with Mozilla, so it's only going to get better. However, the realist in me says that once Firefox really takes off, we can look forward to people finding security exploits in it too.

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  177. PR on the main page? by HungSquirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one who is bothered by the fact that Mozilla has placed a potentially unstable preview release on their main page, and made people have to search around to get the stable older release? You don't win converts by feeding them potentially buggy software and giving them a bad impression of it when it crashes.

    --
    $ whatis themeaningoflife
    themeaningoflife: not found
    1. Re:PR on the main page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This PR release is more stable and less buggy than any version before it. So no, I'm not bothered. That old stable release isn't as good as 1.0PR and any Firefox developer will admit as much.

      Kudos to the devs for all the great new features.

  178. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by iceperson · · Score: 1

    I love tabs too but nothing compares to dual screen goodness. How people function with a single monitor is just beyond me.

  179. Simply the best argument for open source by mredar · · Score: 1

    Firefox is the single best argument for open source projects I've found. This browser kicks ass!!!! I've been able to convert quite a few people off IE and onto Firefox--once they saw the speed of FF and the tab & search features. Many of these people tried netscape or mozilla but were dissatified with the performance, Firefox addressed that and kicks IE's butt!!

    When people say open source doesn't work, I show them Firefox!

    Thanks to all the people who work on this excellent browser!

  180. Mozilla vs. Firefox and Thunderbird? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    So there's new Firefox, and updated Mozilla. Are the browsers the same? (In the past, the answer was No, and I assume it's still no.) Which one should I pick?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  181. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by pklinken · · Score: 0

    You will be out of a job soon, watch it!

  182. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by kwandar · · Score: 1

    Yes - and with Outlook you get all those nifty winmail.dat files too! Argh!

    Outlook is big, slow, and bulky - and the interface isn't anything that thrills me. I personally find it kind of confusing.

    I am slowly changing our office over but unfortunately I need a way to deal with Outlook generated winmail.dat files. If Thunerbird ever manages to provide that, I'm set and Outlook is out of here!

  183. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Programmer_In_Traini · · Score: 1

    I don't think its about the tabs or the popups but the cookie / spyware blocking.

    I did a major clean-up on client's computer last week. The computer was totally cluttered with junk, spy daemons (demons :p), viruses ... all the fun stuff you know...

    I installed the ad-aware, avg and firefox trio and didn't hear a single word ever since. Ok ... its been only last week but given where they browse ... 1 week is significative :)

    ad-aware is there for the safety because it isn't even cleaning a thing now.

    --
    If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
  184. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    In my experience, it also has problems with .lnk files. I had people in the office emailing around shortcuts and it gave Thunderbird fits.

  185. So, have they fixed the installer yet? by Run4yourlives · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Considering it's version 1.0, can we upgrade this PR to the vanilla 1.0 when it comes out, or will I have to uninstall it again?

    This is a major shortfall for any real deployment: read other that my personal pc.

    1. Re:So, have they fixed the installer yet? by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

      Yeah, or you install over the old one, and it leaves all the previous "Add/Remove Program" entries.

      Also, if you elect not to install shortcuts, it still creates an empty folder in your Start Menu.

      --
      #include <sig.h>
  186. Several security holes fixed by hweimer · · Score: 1

    As with every new Mozilla release, several security issues have been fixed, including some problems leading to remote code execution. Sadly, there has been no advisory so far.

    A list of the fixes can be found here. Note that this list is probably incomplete.

    --
    OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
  187. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Phisbut · · Score: 2, Informative
    There's a lot of things done better in Mozilla through extensions.

    For one, am I really forced to press ctrl to stop links from opening in a new window? And those links that use a new window, there's really no way to keep them in tabs?

    I recommend the Mouse Gestures extension. I always open my links in a tab with gestures. That's the only thing I missed when I switched from the big O, but wouldn't switch back now.

    --
    After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
    - The Tao of Programming
  188. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by lord_humungous · · Score: 1

    I switched my sister-in-law's browser over to firefox from IE6 while I was doing regular maintenance on her computer( a POS Dell running XP home). A few days later I heard from my mom that my sister-in-law just couldn't believe how much faster her computer was running. I thought this was odd - I had installed XP SP2 and defragged the HD but I hadn't noticed any great speed increase when I was playing with it.

    After talking to her about it I finally got the translation. It seems "My computer is so much faster" = "I can browse the internet a lot faster now". Heh.

    Thunderbird will have to wait though. I installed 0.7.3 on my system the other day and wasn't too impressed. I'll give it another try when 1.0 final comes out.

  189. Thunderbird question by d_jedi · · Score: 1

    Does the new Thunderbird have support for multi-part and yEnc-encoded binary newsgroup postings?

    I tried Thunderbird a while back, when I switched to Firefox, and was underwhelmed with the functionality... even Outlook Express is better in this regard!

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
    1. Re:Thunderbird question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Does the new Thunderbird have support for multi-part and yEnc-encoded binary newsgroup postings?"

      No and it doesn't look like anyone is working on it.

    2. Re:Thunderbird question by d_jedi · · Score: 1

      Wow. I just reported the bug.. turns out that they've known about this flaw (first reported to bugzilla) in November of 2000! Yikes!

      So much for open source being more flexible, etc. etc.

      --
      I am the maverick of Slashdot
  190. Re:Slashdot rendering warrants "MAJOR BUG" status( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The larger problem is that many sites don't validate to any W3C standard (*cough*slashdot*cough). How should Firefox render them? It just "guesses," and it doesn't always work out well.

  191. the world wide web is too much with us... by johnjay · · Score: 1

    The phrase "spreadfirefox" made me immediately think of "spreadingsantorum". Maybe I'm too puerile to promote Mozilla.

  192. Firefox just gets better and better by ZipR · · Score: 1

    Some nice new features in the new release. The search kicks ass. So does the yellow bar for secure pages.

  193. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

    Well, there's a type of person rumored to exist, that belongs to a group known as the "unwashed masses". These individuals don't really care about computers or technology much, and use their computers much like they would use a television set or a toaster oven.

    I only know a few of these types; they don't really like Firefox nor hate it, they just don't care, so they'll likely keep using MSIE since it's always there for them.

    The biggest downside is that we are vastly outnumbered by these people, even if we'd rather not associated with them often, so most companies and such will continue to cater to them. As a collective, they are the "customer" who the companies want to support. So those of us who don't want to join this collective get screwed.

    It's unfortunate, too, but that's just the way it is. Most people just Don't Care(TM).

    -Z

  194. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Other options:

    • Use OpenOffice.org 'Export to PDF' feature
    • Print to file, then run ps2pdf (psutils available in Cygwin, too!)
    • Etc..
  195. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How about converting 208 students taking a first year chemistry course? I'm a sessional lecturer for that course and my notes won't print properly in InternetExplorer, so I have required that the students download Mozilla or FireFox.

  196. Intial Thoughts... by hendridm · · Score: 1

    I just upgraded to Firefox 1.0PR from Firefox 0.9.3. The new find interface (Control-F) takes a bit of getting used to, but it's not too bad. I might eventually even like it. When I visited a site with Flash, it prompted me to install the plugin and provided a wizard to do so. I thought that was a big improvement for novice users (even though it installed version 6 instead of 7). Also, for sites that are RSS-capable, it has a nifty little icon in the lower right-hand corner. If you click it, you can "subscribe" to the RSS link. It then puts an RSS feed in your favorites menu. Very neat. Slashdot even supports it! Doesn't look like the Slashdot rendering bug has been fixed yet, though. Since the Firefox team doesn't seem to care, perhaps the Slashcode authors could a hack to fix this? Yeah, I know you shouldn't have to, but I imagine a great deal of Slashdotters use Fox and it's quite annoying.

    For those who don't know, there is a simple hack to fix the Slashdot rendering problem:

    1. Create a new button in your "Bookmarks Toolbar Folder" called "Fix Slashdot Rendering" or something.
    2. For the URL, put this:
    javascript:document.getElementsByTagName(%2 2body%2 2)[0].style.display='none';document.getElementsByT agName(%22body%22)[0].style.display='block';void(0 );

    NOTE: You'll need to remove the extra spaces Slashcode produces.

    Anytime Slashdot renders incorrectly, just click this newly created button on your button bar and it will fix it.

    Cheers!

    1. Re:Intial Thoughts... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 3, Informative

      Doesn't look like the Slashdot rendering bug has been fixed yet, though. Since the Firefox team doesn't seem to care, perhaps the Slashcode authors could a hack to fix this?
      They do care, it's been fixed in the trunk. Not sure if this will make it to 1.0 release though.

  197. Re:Slashdot rendering warrants "MAJOR BUG" status( by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 2, Informative
    check it out.. the rendering of the left column of Slashdot has been corrected in this release

    Unfortunately, no. It has been corrected in the trunk, but Firefox 1.0PR is not using the latest version, it aims for "stability" :-(

  198. Re:Slashdot rendering warrants "MAJOR BUG" status( by Not+Public · · Score: 1

    and the funny thing is, the instant i booted the new version- guess what bug i saw?

  199. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Phisbut · · Score: 1
    I've had more popups in the last week than I have since switching to Firefox months ago.

    For educational purposes, could you point me to a page where there is an unrequested advertisement popup that Firefox doesn't block?

    --
    After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
    - The Tao of Programming
  200. It's covered because it's still broken. by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yes, there are different ways to force Mozilla or Firefox to redraw. That doesn't mean that something isn't still broken, and if it's the browser, then the browser ought to fix it.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  201. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by badriram · · Score: 1

    And all of you dont know the difference between Outlook and Outlook Express.

    Outlook: Microsoft's Flagship PIM/Email Desktop software part of Office
    Outlook Express: Microsoft's Free Email/News Client
    I use outlook 2k3 and trust me thunderbird does not have all the features i want, evolution kinda does....

  202. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by jsebrech · · Score: 1

    Thank you. That's annoyance fixed, several to go...

    What are the other ones?

  203. Just one?? :) by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    I switched over an entire development team of 15 to the Firefox/Thunderbird combo.

    Come on now...pay it forward :)

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  204. Question: What's new in 1.7.3? by bziman · · Score: 1
    I can never seem to find a list of changes since the previous point release -- I'm at 1.7.1. What's been fixed between 1.7.1 and 1.7.3 that would make it worth my time to update? Have they fixed the stupid annoying memory leak / quick launch issues? Have they got the e-mail headers to scroll with the message body? Really, those are the only issues I have with Mozilla, and they've been there since before 1.0.

    -brian

    1. Re:Question: What's new in 1.7.3? by HSpirit · · Score: 1

      The list is here - as is typical in a point-point release, they're all security fixes only.

      (My favourite comment is:

      The "send page" function can overrun the heap on very long links. With compelling content that people will want to forward to all their friends and the right link this could be used to execute arbitrary code.
      )
    2. Re:Question: What's new in 1.7.3? by bziman · · Score: 1
      I'd imagine that there are other non-security changes, too, but this is certainly better information than what I had before, so thanks very much.

      --brian

  205. Dammit! by sockonafish · · Score: 1

    No love for OS X!

    Not Found

    The requested URL /pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/0.10/Firefox 1.0PR.dmg.gz was not found on this server.

    Apache/2.0.49 (Gentoo/Linux) Server at ftp.mozilla.org Port 80

    1. Re:Dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also in windows sorry to say - whahappened?

  206. Re:Image rendering problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find that Firefox on RedHat and Win2000 sometimes doesn't display images in web pages. It quite consistently doesn't show the map images in MapQuest. I have to Right-Click -> View Image in order to see the map. I don't have any extensions.

    I thought it was a quirk of my Linux setup (half-upgraded from RH9 to FC1) but then I noticed it on Windows partition. And Firefox running on WinXP at my work computer.

    Also, I've never seen this with Mozilla proper, just Firefox. Weird since they both use Gecko?

    Fix it please!!

  207. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
    So?

    I was replying to the comment about switching people you know. I replied that I don't know anybody who uses IE.

    Sure, lots of people use IE. Lots of people speak Chinese. Lots of people don't have a phone. I don't know any. Thus, if someone said "Let everybody know about this great thing called a phone", it wouldn't apply to me; everybody I know has one.

    It's not some sort of great announcement, it's simply a shrug of a comment. You're right... Most people just Don't Care(TM), and I'm one of them. I'm happy with KDE on SUSE, and I've been happy with various *nix since the 80s. Never had much reason to switch.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  208. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by MyHair · · Score: 1
    • Print to file, then run ps2pdf (psutils available in Cygwin, too!)


    You can use redmon (redirect monitor) from the Ghostscript project to automate that in the windows printer. Redmon lets you crate local ports (e.g. RPT1:) and filter the print data through other programs such as gs, ps2pdf or some of the included filters. (I love redfile...want to print to file but not have to enter a filename? Use filter redfile outfile%04d.prn and have numbered sequential outputs like outfile0000.prn, outfile0001.prn, etc..)
  209. Admuncher costs money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all admuncher costs money. And I don't know if you've used adblock but how can it possibly "blow" adblock away? It sounds like your full of hot air because adblock works extremely well by any measure and blocks everything under the sun, all for FREE. All things being equal the Free version "blows away" the commercial payware version. Plus there are a tons of great extensions for Firefox that you'll simply never see for IE. Also as the other person mentioned, why would I want a billion 3rd party programs running just to shore up a crappy browser?

    Secondly Avant being based on IE still has the same security problems. Sorry but it is NOT safe to use IE anymore. Why do you think our own government even warned against it? Firefox isn't perfect and just with any piece of software it WILL have security problems. But it is more than an order of magnitude safer to use than IE ever will be. That's what you get when you weld in an insecure web browser to the core of your operating system.

    You can dress up a turd all you want, in the end its still gonna be a turd.

  210. Re:onions by dimario · · Score: 3, Funny

    You were lucky enough to have onions, all we had back in those days were tulip bulbs! Try shampooing your hair with one of those, and *then* you'll know the true meaning of hardship.

    Plus I never figured out how to enter all those #*&^! European diacritis on the slide rule (even the German models we used at the time for some reason didn't have them)

  211. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by orangesquid · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to things like ^a, ^e, and ^u for beginning, end, and kill? Is there any way to get these back in the new firefox?

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  212. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As someone who will be 36 in 16 days I have to remind you of something. We are now old enough to legally date women half our age.

    You've been missing out for years. Some states have 16 as the age of consent. Of course they have to be 18 before you can make films.

  213. Wouldn't it be nice if... by heffrey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Quoting from the Thunderbird release notes:

    Important: if the account already has messages in the Inbox or other folders, you should copy or move these messages into Local Folders before setting the account to use the Global Inbox. If you don't copy or move the messages into Local Folders and you set the account to use the Global Inbox, the account will no longer be displayed in the folders pane and you will not be able to access those messages unless you go back and undo the Global Inbox setting. Also, if you have set up any filters that filter mail into this account, you should disable/delete them or change the destination folder.

    Why doesn't the program do this for you automatically? That's the sort of attention to detail and user experience that would really help.

    I know these are pre-release versions so maybe such features will be added for version 1.0.

  214. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by MadChicken · · Score: 2, Informative

    He's a web developer and doesn't use Firefox? Yikes.

    Here's how to convert Web developers. Point them to this page:

    http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/ (Especially the complexspiral one)

    Go there in Firefox/Moz and in IE at the same time. Ask them to compare, and just stand back.

    --
    SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
  215. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

    Real humor goes unoticed on slashdot

    --
    Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  216. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I showed one of my relatives Firefox too, but he wasn't too interested - even though he had reformatted his HDD twice or thrice cuz of spyware and scum coming in thru IE.

    That's the key. "I warned you that your system turned to crap because you were using IE. I suggested you use Firefox. You declined. Now your system has turned to crap again. I can't justify coming over every six months to rescue you from IE. I understand that LocalBusinessName has technicians available at reasonable rates. Call me when you're willing to switch."

    Either way you spend less time repairing computers for free; you win either way.

  217. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Hyrle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm going to add myself to the list of help desk technicians here advocating Mozilla. I work as an escalation technician for a third-party company who provides support for MSN users, and I would have to say a good 75% of my calls involve browser-hijacking spyware. By the time people come to me, their IE is usually so hosed that it's almost less time-consuming for the customer to reinstall Windows. Spybot S&D, AdAware and other similar programs are the only things that keep me from going aboslutely insane as well. "No spyware" is not the only reason to use Mozilla, but it sure is a compelling one. I use the Mozilla suite as my default browser and love it. With Quick Launch enabled, the first browser window comes up faster than IE's - my only beef with Firefox being that the first window often took a while. I've never been one to care for tabbed browsing (just so used to using alt-tab to switch between browser windows) but it certainly takes less RAM to have 10 mozilla windows open than 10 IE windows. I use IE very little anymore - just for Windows Updates and sites which decide to be buggy with Mozilla for whatever reason. These sites are getting fewer and fewer as Mozilla gets better. So take it from a guy who works for MSN - Mozilla is the browser of the future. Without some major security overhauls to IE, it just won't be able to compete.

  218. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    It seems kind of appropriate to have a folder full of porn called "sex" on the fucking desktop.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  219. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by tyroney · · Score: 1

    I doubt that was their bug. IE used to do the exact same thing a version or so ago. It's due to the inplementatin of shortcuts being at an abstracted rather than a more transparent level.

  220. Great quote by rd_syringe · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Ok I'm 15 and I've been using Firefox for like an year now.." - 80% of Slashdot

    1. Re:Great quote by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Except this guy.

      He used to wear an onion on his belt.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    2. Re:Great quote by NeoChaosX · · Score: 1

      > "Ok I'm 15 and I've been using Firefox for like an year now.." - 80% of Slashdot

      I take offense to this. I've been using Firefox for a year, and I'm 19. :P

      --
      One man's selflessness is another man's annoyance.
  221. There WAS one for v.8... by thegnu · · Score: 1, Informative

    Look at the older extensions and hit the guy up for the source code. Or kidnap his family and make him make you the plugin for v1.0.

    It was called Enhanced Tab Browsing or something like that.

    It isn't responsibility of the Firefox developers to update all plugins, since they are unsupported by mozilla.org. Any plugin they choose to endorse they pretty much have to provide support for.

    But find out where to request features, and request the heck out of it.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  222. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 1

    The Google toolbar's popup blocking is pretty good, but mail.com manages to thwart it on their homepage (it blocks most of them, but they slip in a pop-under). I never got around to digging into the source to figure out what they're doing, but whatever it is, it doesn't work in Firefox. No idea about XP SP2.

  223. Touchpad doesn't work with FF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My only gripe (but a huge one for me since I am on the laptop a lot) is the inability to use my touchpad to go BACK to the last page. I am able to scroll up and down using the side of the touchpad but am unable to use the top to go back a page. If that problem can be fixed, I would be hooked (more than I already am). ;-)

    Latitude D600

  224. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can ctrl+tab between tabs too. I got used to it pretty fast

  225. Favicons in the taskbar by Guillermito · · Score: 1

    Now... If only Mozilla could display favicons in the taskbar as Konqueror does.

    See bug 82130 in Bugzilla

    http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8213 0

    (don't bother to make it a proper link since bugzilla doesn't allow referrers from Slashdot)

  226. Firefox is not the solution by monkeyGrease · · Score: 1

    However, the realist in me says that once Firefox really takes off, we can look forward to people finding security exploits in it too.

    Firefox alone is not the solution. It is part of the solution. So is Konqueror. Diversity of implementations of acceptable standards is the solution. Many browsers with one standard to rule them all. So even IE could be part of the solution if it followed acceptable standards.

  227. I may be wrong, but... by thegnu · · Score: 0

    0.9 is their feature-freeze version. So they're not really adding any features to speak of. Possibly pretty little colors and different keystrokes, but it's essentially the same.

    So I think it's as stable or more stable than previous versions. There IS that 0.0001% chance though. SHAME on them.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  228. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Kernkraft400 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry, I'm just too damn lazy! Plus I use an extension to Firefoz which automatically converts any links / emails to hyperlinks for me.

    Have a look at http://www.beggarchooser.com/firefox/ (*ahem* http://www.beggarchooser.com/firefox/) - converts text links to genuine, bona fide hyperlinks.

  229. The problem by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    What's weird is that this issue seems almost random. What happens is that table of links on the left side of the page overlaps into the content in the middle. I see it most often on the front page when listing stories.

    It's been a complaint for a long time now, yet still no change. It's either Firefox's rendering or it's Slashdot's poor HTML coding (and for all its standards-compliance bitching, we know how standards-compliant this site is, *cough*).

    1. Re:The problem by mopslik · · Score: 2

      It's been a complaint for a long time now, yet still no change.

      ...which is sad, considering that A List Apart has had a solution posted for nearly a year now.

      Or maybe it was tried to no avail. Beats me.

  230. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    There's a bug with it (in linux at least), though. If you have something in your selection buffer, as soon as you release the mouse in autoscroll, you end up bouncing (or trying to be bounced if the cut buffer is not a URI) to whatever site was in the cut buffer.

  231. What I really want by hawkbug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I really want is a Mozilla Suite like application that includes firefox and thunderbird in it. The regular Mozilla combo pack sucks in my opinion because of the nonstandard gui attached to it that's very slow to open, etc. I love the guis in thunderbird and firefox, but I can't figure out how to integrate the profiles for both apps into one like Mozilla suite has. There would be no stopping Mozilla if they would simply do that.

  232. the older the better by danZenie · · Score: 1

    i find that trying to convert an older person is much easier than trying to convert the younger ones. for the most part older people tend to have this aura of respect for IT geeks, while the youngers tend to have this "yeah, yeah, i know, i know" attitude. whenever i give an older person a piece of IT advice it is taken as a Bible verse. Try that with the kiddies.

    --
    You need people like me so you can point your fuckin fingers and say, "That's the bad guy." So what that make you? Good?
  233. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by sharkey · · Score: 1

    XP Service Pack 2 may fix this for you. Opera, Firefox and IE 6 all bitched about shortcuts to folders on a DFS when saving prior to SP2.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  234. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    You forgot to add that nickels had pictures of bees on them. "Give me 5 bees for a quarter" I'd say...

  235. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has documented a way? What? I've been detecting whether the popups I create actually exist or not for quite a while - you just check to see if the window exists and if it's been closed. That's basic JavaScript.

    BTW, no, I don't generate unrequested popups - this is for site navigation, etc, where it's actually useful to the users who click "show popup", for example. :)

  236. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

    Actually, my current mission is to find a valid link for this. The ones provided on mozilla.org are all broken for Windows. (the link is http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/rel eases/0.10/Firefox%20Setup%201.0PR.exe )

  237. didn't work for me out of the box by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

    On a win2k box with Firefox 0.9.3 and some extensions like adblock and firesomething, I installed 1.0PR in separate folder and when I opened it up no buttons or menus would work, my bookmarks gone. After a couple clicks on stuff the whole app would lock up. After a couple of resintallaions and reboots I decided to rename my Mozilla preferences folder and now it works. I don't know what was preventing it from working but this is how I got it work. Backwards compatability isn't 100%. :(

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  238. The new Find toolbar rocks by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Man, it is worth the download just for the Find toolbar.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  239. lack of mailto and http handling is a FEATURE by crimethinker · · Score: 1
    One of the major, major annoyances for me is inability to open mailto: urls in Firefox using Thunderbird and vise versa (http links in Thunderbird in Firefox).

    Your complaint was my dream come true; I got tired of web bugs in spam, links that used javascript to disguise that they were mailto: a harvesting address, etc. I ditched IE and Outlook forever, even at work, and used Netscape. Unfortunately, there is still "too much" integration between the components of NS, and so I settled on Firefox for browsing, and Sylpheed-Claws for mail. I have to copy mail addresses and switch to my mail client, or copy a link and switch to my browser, but now I don't get hit with the latest e-mail virus du jour, web bugs don't work, and I'm quite satisfied with the trade-offs.

    Now, rather than arguing that my view is better than yours, I'll say this: isn't is wonderful to have a CHOICE? If you want http and mailto between your mail and browser, choose Mozilla or start hacking away in the FF and Thunderbird code. I don't want such a thing, and so I choose different programs. If Sylpheed-Claws begins supporting http in my e-mail, I'll either find a new client, freeze my version, or even begin a fork of the project. We all have the choice, and that is why Open Source is, IMHO, the best option for all of us.

    Finally, I can't let this go without a security bashing on Microsoft. If Outlook couldn't render HTML, how many of these damn don't-need-to-open-attachment-to-spread-virus viruses and worms would have been stopped cold? Given that Outlook and IE's incestuous coupling has helped spread worms and viruses, is that really a feature we should be copying?

    -paul

    --
    Pistol caliber is like religion: everyone has their favourite, and theirs is the only right choice.
    1. Re:lack of mailto and http handling is a FEATURE by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1

      If Sylpheed-Claws begins supporting http in my e-mail

      I too use Sylpheed-Claws, and it's a nice client IMO. There's an extension that uses the Dillo web browser as a plugin to SC to render incoming HTML e-mail (except images I think) if you require it, but I agree it's very nice that there's a client that doesn't support it out of the box!

      I use the Dillo plugin as sometimes somebody decides to send an HTML only e-mail (and they get a form e-mail back asking them not to do it again!) - you just click on the icon to the right of the preview area if you want to read the HTML part of the message.

      On a sidenote, I don't recommend upgrading to 0.9.12a (0.9.12 worked fine) - there's an annoying bug that causes a segfault when moving messages without a Message-ID header. It's been fixed in CVS however.

  240. Brokened :( by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Anyone else wonder why several plug ins broke with this update? I can't see many new features but seems alot of breakage for the sake of it..

    Other wise it's just another update to the fox. We'll all love it, it'll run well and have 1-2 new features we'll find in a few hours. Everyone will insult IE and get modded +5 funny and.. well we'll carry on as normal :)

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Brokened :( by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

      I think it's due to this being v1.0 (or 0.10) and the last 3-4 versions were just defined as "0.9" so plugins for 0.9.0 still worked through 0.9.3

      It's the same problem when moving from 0.8, you can often just fix it by changing the version number in the .xpi file, or sometimes I found try installing the extension twice (install, quit, install, quit, then it works!)

      --
      #include <sig.h>
  241. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by cloudmaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "I don't use firefox because it's unstable." "I prefer IE." Are these the same person? Web developers, expecially. I use firefox to develop web sites, and then add in whatever "fixes" are required to make IE behave like a standards-compliant browser. Most of the time, this saves me lots of time. Sometimes it saves only a little. If for no other reason, there's an actual useful javascript error console and debugger (much like most netscape browsers)! Have you ever tried debugging javascript errors in IE? It's a nightmare.

  242. I'm still using Opera by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    Mozilla's a great project, but I'm still using the lighter, faster browser with half the download size. Tabbed browsing? Opera did that first. Mouse gestures? Opera did that first. All of the major features people ooh and aww over in Firebird existed in Opera first and were copied. And my Opera takes up WAY less memory and is way more responsive. And I don't need to know XUL to customize my toolbars *exactly* how I want. :) I've got every single button in tiny size running down the left side of my screen, with tabs and the addressbar running along the bottom. My transfers window is in a sidebar on the right side of my screen.

    1. Re:I'm still using Opera by Jugalator · · Score: 1
      Mozilla's a great project, but I'm still using the lighter, faster browser with half the download size. Tabbed browsing? Opera did that first. Mouse gestures? Opera did that first. All of the major features people ooh and aww over in Firebird existed in Opera first and were copied. And my Opera takes up WAY less memory and is way more responsive. And I don't need to know XUL to customize my toolbars *exactly* how I want. :) I've got every single button in tiny size running down the left side of my screen, with tabs and the addressbar running along the bottom. My transfers window is in a sidebar on the right side of my screen.

      ... and best of all, you don't have to download an extension like this. :-P

      Seriously, I find both browsers good, but for the above reason and because I favor open source software when it comes to stuff that have very much to do with internet security (like browsers), I'm going for Firefox. But I agree Opera has a rich feature set and an innovative team of designers behind it. However, I can't say I care much who was first about what feature. As long as a browser has the features I need, I'm happy. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:I'm still using Opera by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

      And Opera has that WAY cool banner ad.
      Unless, of course you pay for it... or crack it.

  243. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Hooded+One · · Score: 3, Informative

    Firefox was finally fixed to use the proper GTK2 keybindings by bug 257405. (No link, b.m.o blocks them from Slashdot) So for example, Ctrl-A finally selects all. If you don't like it, I think you're supposed to change your GTK prefs to use emacs-style, or use a GTK1 build which still has the old configuration.

    Personally, I prefer shortcuts that actually make sense and match every other GUI app in existence.

  244. Amazing... by junk · · Score: 1

    I grabbed all three about 30 minutes ago on one machine and now all the links are broken. Wonder if it sucks to be all the slow people who didn't get it or if it's about to suck to be one of the quick who did. Mozilla should have the bandwidth to sustain all of us. Wonder why they'd have done that... /me gets out box of tinfoil hats for sale
    i'm gonna make a killing!

  245. Re:This is fixed in the gecko trunk plus a workaro by juhaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey, it's fixed in the trunk. I believe the fix will be in 1.0 final.

    Not necessarily so, it doesn't block 1.0 so it's not guaranteed to be fixed in it, it might be but last comments in the bug suggest there still might be some regressions so it won't go into big release like 1.0 if they're not absolutely sure it won't break anything else.

    So it's not automatically in until the next branch, whenever that is. 1.1?

  246. um? by thegnu · · Score: 1, Informative

    I know you're not flaming or anything but here's my take. ///Some sites still don't render quite right///
    I think that while it's kind of annoying, it's the web designer using IE-specific tags creating the website (for the most part).

    I worked with a company who had a paysite and they had the worst html I've ever seen. No doctype header, no meta tags other than keywords, and loads and loads of sloppy html and nested tables.

    I designed them a site using some CSS and cleaned up their code and got rid of some tables and they never used it.

    My brother has also been struggling with his boss who designed some pages in Adobe's web design software, and had tables upon tables with different amounts of columns per row. ///It bombs MUCH more than IE did///
    I've had the opposite experience, but I believe you. I've also noticed that when IE bombs, ALL IE windows bomb, Explorer bombs.

    Keep in mind whenever you use a pre-v1 release of a product, you're liable to experience problems and your problems will be better resolved reporting them to the development team.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
    1. Re:um? by airjrdn · · Score: 1

      Thanks for taking me seriously.

      I've reported a few problems to SF projects, but they've almost all gone un-replied to. I'm a software developer myself, so I tend to only report actual bugs, not useage annoyances.

      What I find strange is the idea that OS projects have many more eyes & programmers yet bugs reported often get no replies...not just mine, just the many I read in their respective forums.

      The other thing is, (and again, I'm not trolling here) OS projects seem never to make it to v1.0, so that makes it tough for people to take OSS seriously.

      Regarding IE, I've seen the IE crashes all IE thing too many times as well, but it helps if you go to Folders-Options and check the box stating to "Launch folder windows in a separate process". Hope that helps you out some.

  247. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by MadChicken · · Score: 1

    The server side controls render to some pretty lame non-standard HTML... so yeah there is reason. Especially since they render different HTML to IE or "other" visitors.

    There's a company that is selling drop-in replacements that render to proper XHTML.

    --
    SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
  248. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
    Thats a bug with Windows, not with PDFCreator.

    I admit it, I was once a Microsoft beta tester, Windows 98. I found and reported this bug, and they refused to fix it.

  249. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still haven't figured out why this isn't part of the core program. Why claim to have tabbed browsing when you have to download an extension to make links actually open in tabs. And last I checked there was still no session management for 0.9 Opera all the way for me, tabbed browsing right out of the box.

  250. Just installed it by erotic_pie · · Score: 0

    I have been using firefox since the 0.7 days I just got admin rights on my local machine at work last week and just installed it a few minutes ago here :-) hell I'm posting from it right now

  251. What's changed since 0.9.3 for me: by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

    1. 1.0PR doesn't seem to work with Neomail's cookies anymore. I guess I'll have to wait until 1.0 final, or switch to Horde....

    2. "x" Extension doesn't work anymore :-(

    3. www.x10.com popunders are no longer prevented when you leave their site, although the popup when you enter the site is blocked still.

    4. Secure sites turn the address bar yellow.

    Luckily the stupid "popup message bar" thing can be turned off, but as is normal with Firefox, Christ knows how you turn it back on again, without editted a shedload of hidden XML files!

    --
    #include <sig.h>
  252. Re:Mirror - Torrent by aonaran · · Score: 2, Informative
  253. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by orangesquid · · Score: 1

    Aha... I tend to like standardization, too, just not on my own computer ;)

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  254. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I honestly don't think I known any IE users anymore

    Wow!

    Your social circle must be incredibly small!

  255. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1

    The good thing is, my upgrade today to Firefox PR1.0 seems to work on a lot of sites that weren't working with Mozilla

    This might have been to the document.all object (originally in IE) that Firefox now supports/emulates or whatever (no, I haven't checked it yet!). If sites have code to detect the object to determine if it's IE, as many do, then they hopefully won't be able to tell.

  256. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by superyooser · · Score: 4, Informative
    Ad-Aware doesn't cut it. Spybot Search & Destroy finds things that Ad-Aware doesn't. For systems that are seriously 0wn3d, you need Spybot. Also, HijackThis, which runs in seconds, is great for getting rid of insidious components that software sneaks on your computer.

    I use all three of these programs. No one program finds everything. Oh, and also use a virus scanner, of course.

  257. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always just ignored those files. Is there actually anything usefull in there?

  258. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, if you go to "about:config" and type in "bugs" in the filter, all the bugs are filtered out.

    Bugg free browser at 0.9/0.1Pre :)

  259. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by kcb93x · · Score: 1

    Tabs ON dual monitors...oh god, I don't know how I ever worked without them.....

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  260. what the hell by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

    I just upgraded, and the slashdot frame is still rendered wrong. Is this some sort of conspiracy or something ?!

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  261. Re: Slashdot rendering.... by thegnu · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have NEVER had a rendering problem using FF at Slashdot. Ever. On 3 different systems. I need to ask my brother if he has. Just for the record, are there regular /.ers who haven't had the problem ever?

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  262. COW ORKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is a "COWORKER"? For that matter, what is "Orking" and why do cows need it doing to them? Ahhh, I get it, you mean a "colleague"! If you're going to use that appalling term, at least hyphenate it: "co-worker". In a few years time the likes of you will be referring to each other as "CO-PRODUCTION-UNITS", or maybe "CO-MY-EMPLOYERS-PROPERTY-MODULES". You're people, with a life, right? (well maybe not as this is /. afterall). Huh! COWORKERS, my arse!

  263. Zips by Ironsides · · Score: 1

    I'm glad they finally brought back the zips of the packages that don't require install. Me and a couple of people I know like to be able to have a fresh browser for things that we can delete imediately afterwards. Like for sites that require cookies and we want to delete the cookies afterwards.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    1. Re:Zips by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      You mean german shizer porn?

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  264. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

    He's probably referring to the Validator widgets.

    The validation is done through javascript depending on the browser User-Agent. I've had numerous experiences where validation works perfectly in IE, but not at all in Firefox/Netscape.

  265. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Wakkow · · Score: 2, Informative

    I find Ctrl+PgUp and Ctrl+PgDn much more efficient.

  266. RTFI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Run The Fscking Installer!

  267. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Malc · · Score: 1

    Bollocks it is. It's a bug with PDFCreator. I don't know why it just doesn't use the standard common dialogs, e.g. ::GetSaveFileName(...). I really like PDFCreator, but I intensely dislike its dialogs.

  268. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
    is to convert an I.E. / outlook user to Mozilla / Thunderbird today ...

    Funnily enough, I'm reading this story at work while providing technical advice (amongst other queries) to our customers.

    I've just accepted this mission, and I believe, suceeded. I took a call from a customer who had bought a new PC and was looking for some advice on getting her broadband connection up and running with it - having given the advice, I went into the "after-support" support, explaining the dangers on the internet and the benefits of using Firefox.

    To cut a long story short - having downloaded and used Firefox, and guided her through tabbed browsing and my other favourite Moz features - she is now a very happy Firefox user.

    --

    Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  269. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Dr.+Shim · · Score: 1

    You are making this sound like a big deal! All I needed to do, in order to convert 90% of all office computers here, was to install Service Pack 2. I must say, SP2 works like magic... I couldn't have converted everyone without it!

    --
    People discover the meaning of life between getting piss drunk and the following hangover.
  270. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by fizban · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only thing that bugs me about the ctrl+tab functionality, is that it doesn't mirror the alt+tab functionality of windows, where if you do an alt+tab to move to another window, release the alt button, then do another alt+tab you'll be back at the window you started with, i.e. it puts recently viewed windows next in your traversal list.

    In Mozilla/Firefox, you have to cycle through all your open tabs to get back to the start. Releasing the ctrl button doesn't put the previously visited tabs next in your list of traversal.

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  271. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Daengbo · · Score: 1

    I am 36, and I have legally dayed women half my age, and legally bought them drinks, but then I'm well-known for this already.

    In short, I am not old... yet.

    And I use Epiphany instead of Moz or FF, but that's just me. FF hangs often on my Debian box.

  272. Outlook and Pictures by enkil76 · · Score: 1

    I have always wanted to stop using Outlook actually in fact Windows. However, Outlook has the email option to resize the pictures without needing to create a new picture. So far I cant find any other email app to do this function. Can the community help me?

  273. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

    I recently started doing help desk type work at a university (technically, I only work in a small part of the university, but its still the same thing). On my own desktop, I use FireFox, and have been recommending it to the students whenever they complain about spyware/adware. So far, in the 6 weeks I've been here, I've had one convert and will probably get more.
    As for Ad-Aware, Spybot S&D, Hijack This!, if it weren't for these tools, I would never get anything done. Thank <insert diety here> that we actually have centrally managed anti-virus software on all of the laptops and desktops I support, otherwise I'd have probably scaled the tallest tower with a rifle by now.

    --
    Necessity is the mother of invention.
    Laziness is the father.
  274. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by almightyjustin · · Score: 1

    It's planned, see http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 which Bugzilla won't allow to be directly linked from Slashdot.

    --

    Omnes arx vestrum sunt adiuncta nobis.

  275. Re:Still no MSI package - other Enterprise issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are talking about? I have been rolling out FF with roaming profiles since version .6. FF puts its config settings including bookmarks into the C:\Documents and Settings\Username\Application Data\Firefox directory. With roaming profiles, everything from the Username on down is synced up with the server copy. Upon logout, any files changed will be copied back to the server. There must be some issue with your network because roaming profiles work fine for me.

  276. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, you're such a stud...and need to grow up.

  277. Dammit, Mozilla still won't display some images! by writertype · · Score: 1
    I don't know whether it's a formatting problem on the part of the web page (which, in my IMO, a browser should try to compensate for) or it's a bug. Anyway, I just get blank spaces when I try to pull up Extremetech, for example. I did a clean install, although I did not delete the directory and start over.

    Anyone else have this problem?

  278. Re:Image rendering problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I find that Firefox on RedHat and Win2000 sometimes doesn't display images in web pages.

    Do you have HTTP Referer turned off? Some servers won't send images if they don't receive the proper Referer header. Open about:config and check network.http.sendRefererHeader. Make sure it's set to 2.

  279. Re:Check that, I mean FireFox by writertype · · Score: 1

    Sorry, everything in the previous message still applies.

  280. Working Torrent by thedillybar · · Score: 1

    The working torrent is here.

  281. Re:Working WINDOWS Torrent by thedillybar · · Score: 1

    Woops, that's the working WINDOWS torrent.

  282. It only partially works. by numbski · · Score: 1

    The RSS feed never updates. I've let it run for 2 hours now, and it's still not grabbed the latest rss.

    This is incredibly confusing, and there's nothing in the Prefs to set how often it pulls the rss feed. ???

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  283. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For educational purposes, could you point me to a page where there is an unrequested advertisement popup that Firefox doesn't block?

    www.ngemu.com

    Intermittently loads something called "advertising loading window" in a new tab when you follow a link; the tab remains empty and no popups appear, but it's the closest I can think of to what you're asking for.

  284. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by crisco · · Score: 1
    Depending on what kind of web development work you father is doing, the Web Developer extension might be a lifesaver.

    And if firefox is still beta, Mozilla has been in release for a while (although it is slower).

    --

    Bleh!

  285. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Z-MaxX · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Heh, I was about to say, "But he *did* link it!" until I realized that the simple-but-oh-so-convenient Firefox extension called "Linkification" had seamlessly made the plain-text url into a hyperlink for me. :)

    --
    Dr Superlove 300ml. I use my powers for awesome
  286. Ah, clearing the cache worked by writertype · · Score: 1

    Why, I don't know. But it did...

  287. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Oh, and in six more years we can buy them drinks.

    36 / 2 = 18
    18 + 6 = 24

    Aren't you 3 years off? (5-6 years if you're in Canada)

  288. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

    Perhaps. But the same bug exists/existed in the standard dialog. At least something similar... If you "Save As.." with a recommended filename, and double click on a link/shortcut, it changes the file name to the name of the shortcut. Doubleclick again, and it follows the shortcut STLL WITH THE SHORTCUTS NAME.

  289. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
    For educational purposes, could you point me to a page where there is an unrequested advertisement popup that Firefox doesn't block?

    At the risk of "me-tooing", I'll second that, having noticed the same effect recently but not thought to bookmark the offending page at the time.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  290. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by FLEB · · Score: 1

    I suppose you could kludge this by having something periodically eyeball your bookmarks.html file, and barf out a bunch of URL shortcuts into a directory.

    Wouldn't be too hard.

    --
    Information wants to be free.
    Entertainment wants to be paid.
    You just want to be cheap.
  291. Just gotta say.... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

    Works great with a few minor problems. Namely, Googlebar, Firesomething, and Downloadwith were disabled upon installation due to incompatibility.

    WTF is with that? I thought the new extension system introduced a few versions ago was supposed to stop this crap.

    Firesomething isn't a priority, cos it's just there to be goofy, and I haven't used DLwith in a while, but the Googlebar is used multiple times a day, so I need that.

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  292. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I am really impressed, as it is the first time I convert someone over 30."

    Did you also circumcise him?

  293. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by isomeme · · Score: 1

    Oh, that rocks so hard! Thanks for pointing this out; it answers my last objection to the tabbed-browsing concept.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  294. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did just that only yesterday. My dad had emailed me with an Outlook problem, and I had responded with a possible solution to the problem. The solution had not worked, so I recommended a couple of other options, mostly involving uninstalling/reinstalling, with the final option being "install Thunderbird". I concluded the email with a bit of an anti-Microsoft rant, which I usually don't get into (I'm a big fan of their business and developer products, I just get frustrated with what they do to their consumer products). The email I received from my dad yesterday informed me that he had made the switch. Cool.

  295. it's pretty ironic by beebz · · Score: 1

    that i read the other replies to this "informative" post in firefox with the sidebar overlapping them.

  296. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

    I really like thunderbird, but if I'm reading a good thread in slashdot and I want to buy some herbal viagra, I can't just right click on my email and "open in new browser tab" That's why I still use the full mozilla suite.

  297. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Felonious+Ham · · Score: 1

    Lotus Notes 6 doesn't recognize Windows directory shortcuts either. I think this an issue with any widget kit that does not bind to Windows native widgets or use native dialogs (I beleive Notes has its own gui toolkit).

  298. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by doombob · · Score: 1

    you are awesome, I've been trying to figure out how to tab between tabs on the keyboard, but i'm too lazy to read the help files. Thanks.

  299. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    36 / 2 = 18
    18 + 6 = 24
    Aren't you 3 years off? (5-6 years if you're in Canada)


    36 + 6 = 42
    42 / 2 = 21

    No, he's not 3 years off. He'll need to be 42 before he can legally buy a drink for a woman half his age.

  300. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    36/2 = 18

    36 + 6 = 42
    42/2 = 21

  301. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by steveha · · Score: 1

    the realist in me says that once Firefox really takes off, we can look forward to people finding security exploits in it too.

    But it will still be better.

    Internet Explorer is designed to install software on your computer (or else Windows Update wouldn't use it). Firefox is just an application and doesn't have the ability to install software. This, alone, makes a huge difference for spyware.

    Firefox does have the ability to install Firefox extensions, which are little scripts that can make Firefox do things. We will need to be vigilant to make sure that there isn't any script-based spyware.

    However, I don't think you can get Firefox to install an extension without popping up a dialog box asking for permission, so it's still better than IE.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  302. Firefox 0.10 Breaking extensions by D+H+NG · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunately, many extensions check for Firefox versions higher than a certain for compatibility. This new Firefox broke more than half of the extensions installed in my previous version.

  303. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by KB1GHC · · Score: 1

    Thunderbird does have excellent spam filters. and it also prevents spammers from knowing that your still checking your email by preventing remote images and scripts.

  304. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Malc · · Score: 1

    It's a bug in the caller. There's an option called OFN_NODEREFERENCELINKS. Furthermore, if the behaviour of the dialog isn't desirable then the caller can specify a hook function. Thus I stand by my statement that it's a bug in caller.

  305. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by ricotest · · Score: 1

    This is awesome. If IE is still unusable when it hits version 7, we'll have a covert group of techies and admins installing Firefox on computers around the globe. If IE is usable, customers won't complain, and we still don't get viruses and spyware. It's win-win!

    (Except for CSS support and proprietary extensions, that is.)

  306. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by ricotest · · Score: 1

    Use a different word such as "start" or "commence."

    Oh, and if Outlook doesn't like the colour yellow I should use lilac or something? These idiots have no respect for the English language!!

  307. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    operamail.com creates a pop-up. On Firefox. I did a double-take when I got that.

  308. ME TOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care what other retarded-ass things javascript is SUPPOSED to let you do, firefox should NEVER let windows steal the focus. This happens all the time when I'm opening windows to read various webmail accounts. Now I've gotten to where I have to wait ~30 seconds to make sure the pages have loaded, otherwise in the middle of typing my password another tab will steal the focus and have my pass being typed into the visible username field in that tab. VERY SERIOUS BUG. maybe fixed in .10, anyone know?

  309. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    I converted one last weekend.

    They are very happy with it, and have had no problems changing over so far.

    Their only concern was that they might lose their bookmarks, but the install prog copied them across perfectly.

  310. Extentions by KB1GHC · · Score: 1

    a word of warning if your planning on upgrading Firefox, some .9 extentions don't work with 1.0

    Ones i found don't work:
    * Allow Right Click
    * BugMeNot
    * Down Them All
    * Googlebar
    (and maybe a few i forgot)
    some update automaticly, but sometimes you need to go to http://update.mozilla.org/extensions/ and do it manually.

    but i like the "find in page" bar they have now, and the built in RSS notifier, it also has better integration to ThunderBird

    Thanks Mozilla! Great browser! and a great mail client!

    1. Re:Extentions by zev1983 · · Score: 1

      Firesomething and Chatzilla also do not work. I feel naked without my LightningBunny...

  311. Re:Slashdot rendering warrants "MAJOR BUG" status( by ricotest · · Score: 1

    It's a major bug because Mozilla can't handle large amounts of nested tables. Slashdot is just the best example for it. I would agree that its priority is probably influenced by public image - most geeks switching are going to use Slashdot, and Firefox not rendering that is a lot worse than not rendering MSN. As the browser's market changes such priority adjustments might phase out.

  312. default off for cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will there be a "default off" for cookies, with some EASY way to enable cookies when you get to sites that you actually want cookies on? Currently I have it prompt for cookies and I almost always hit deny, and I still hit deny for some sites then later find I need cookies for that site. The only way I've found to re-enable cookies is to go searching through the HUGE list of exceptions for one of the URLs the site might be setting cookies from (ie: is it slashdot.org, www.slashdot.org, it.slashdot.org, etc.).

    On several occasions I've given up on finding the blocked cookie and had to remove all exceptions to get a site to work.

    I know it might not be easy, but there needs to be a much simpler way of handling cookies. It should be as easy as a toolbar cookie button that gets clicked and unclicked to allow/disallow cookies that page tried to set (or maybe cookies from *.domain.com, whichever is easiest or works most consistently).

    (i know there has been an extension in the past that added a cookie toolbar button, but it's behavior was not very useful)

  313. Re:Still no MSI package - other Enterprise issues by omicronish · · Score: 1

    Currently no mozilla based browser will work "automatically" with roaming profiles. What happens is that a user will create his profile on one computer, move to another, then Firefox (Mozilla, Netscape, etc) will continually ask for a profile since it does not find the one that was created previously.

    You might want to recheck, since I currently have Firefox working with roaming profiles and don't recall any difficulties in doing so. The profiles are stored in the Application Data\Firefox directory of a user's profile, so it should work. With that said, their usage of roaming profiles is bad in that they store the Internet cache in Application Data\Firefox instead of Local Settings\Application Data\Firefox. What this means is that with a 50 MB cache, logging on and logging off means resynchronizing 50 MB of data with the domain server. This is 50 MB of unnecessary traffic in the worst case when the client needs to copy the cache back to the server, and is unacceptable in a large domain with roaming profiles.

    Another complaint I hear from fellow Adminstrators is the fact that you can easily "lock down" Internet Explorer by using Group Policies through Active Directory. Example, you can easily change the home page of every user by simply creating a policy object and applying it to an Active Directory User Container that includes all of your users. To do this with Firefox would take hours (if not days) depending on the number of installations.

    Yes, this is needed. The lack of Group Policies for Firefox meant that I had to edit the Javascript files that determined Firefox settings manually. The act of editing wasn't that bad, since settings were decently documented. What was lacking was documentation regarding what each of the files themselves did. I literally found 3 or 4 .js files with settings in various places in the Firefox folder, and to this day, I have no idea what the difference between each is. Compare this with IE SP2 (pre-SP2 IE control via Group Policy was worthless because they didn't expose enough settings), where all security settings can be set by simply clicking checkboxes or selecting items in a listbox.

    And the nice thing with IE group policy is that I can change settings and reapply to everyone as you mentioned. Reapplying Firefox settings right now would basically require reinstalling Firefox, which isn't bad with MSI support, but might be a pain otherwise (I created my own MSI so I don't know about the latter case).

  314. 4 Extentions that should be bundled with Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefox is great, but extentions make it better. Here are 4 extentions that (IMHO) should come bundled with every Firefox.

    Tabbrowser Preferences
    http://www.pryan.org/mozilla/site/The OneKEA/tabpre fs/
    Provides a comprehensive UI for changing a number of the hidden tabbed browsing preferences in Firefox

    Linkification
    http://www.beggarchooser.com/fire fox/
    Linkification - Allows Firefox to view plain-text URLs and e-mail addresses as actual links

    Paste and Go
    http://tecwizards.de/mozilla/
    This extension lets you paste an URL from the clipboard into the address bar and load it as a single step

    Targetalert
    http://www.bolinfest.com/targetaler t/
    Provides visual cues for the destinations of hyperlinks.

  315. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefoz!

    it's the Fonzi reborn!

  316. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    Please tell me how! I'm stuck here at work forced to use IE/Outlook, and desperately want something else. There are multiple "web applications" that I have to use, such as time card, employee portal, collaboration, etc, that require the use of Internet Exploder. So while I can browse Slashdot comfortably with Firefox, I still have to use IE for everything internal.

    And the mail situation isn't much better. I have to use Outlook Calendar, so Outlook has to stay around. And I've also discovered that Exchange manages to lose a lot of emails and attachements if I don't use Outlook. I have no idea but I guess there's stuff that Exchange won't serve out to IMAP. After two years of this they finally enabled the webdav for Exchange, but unfortunately I need to go through the IE-only employee portal to access it.

    Sigh. One year ago today I was happily using Konqueror, KMail and KDE under FreeBSD at work. But I guess our CTO read too much PC World, because now the use of Windows, IE and Outlook are mandatory. Hell, we've even been commanded to replace the RTOS in one of our products with WinXPe...

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  317. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by asa · · Score: 1

    You can find all the tools you need (and if you can't then help us build them) at the new Firefox community marketing websote, SpreadFirefox.com

    We don't have the marketing budget the other guys have so we depend on word of mouth (and word of blog) to turn people on to Firefox. Help us spread the word at SpreadFirefox.com.

    --Asa

  318. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
    If sites have code to detect the object to determine if it's IE, as many do, then they hopefully won't be able to tell.

    Even without detection, just the existence of the object makes things tons better. I just tested it today on a web scenario that I wrote for our corporate internet. I designed the thing specifically for Internet Explorer because I didn't have time to do enough research to replace some of the IE-specific code with standards-compliant code that was both elegant and performed well. During my test today, I only found ONE thing that wasn't working, and I'm pretty sure I can fix it quickly.

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  319. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd like to hear from fellow slashdotters if they've faced similar problems in converting people to firefox.

    Maybe you should stop trying to convert them. They treat you this way because you're more annoying than the neighbor trying to get them to join Amway. This isn't a religion, so stop trying to peddle Firefox like it's the Watchtower or something...

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  320. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    I am really impressed, as it is the first time I convert someone over 30.

    I'm impressed as hell. I'm forty and I'm still trying to figure out this new fangled mouse thingy...

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  321. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But since it is displaying instantly, and its a web browser, that functionality wouldn't quite make sense. Treat it like text fields. Ctrl+Tab over, Ctrl+Shift+Tab back. Or as someone else has mentioned, Ctrl+PgUp and Ctrl+PgDown.

  322. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by AssProphet · · Score: 1

    Boy I was wrong. He was over-enthusiast. He downloaded it as fast as possible

    wow it sounds like his connection speed was over-enthusiast too!

  323. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HOLY SHAZAM BATMAN, thanks for the middle click information!

  324. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Kethinov · · Score: 1

    There are browser extensions for IE such as Avant that give it all the features Firefox has. This has, unfortunately, stifled my progress in switching people off IE. It seems these people don't think web standards matter. They use IE because "the websites they go to are more likely to work" which is a symptom of web designers designing solely for IE users. That, and these people only go to "websites they can trust." If you ever want to see some disgusting MS / IE apologist threads, go to the Ars Technica Battlefront forum. It's pretty sad there.

    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  325. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by jonasj · · Score: 2, Informative
    you have to cycle through all your open tabs to get back to the start.
    no, you don't: ctrl+shift+tab selects the previous tab.
    --
    You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
  326. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by DrMorris · · Score: 1

    Sad but true... there is no official GTK 1.x build anymore. The source doesn't even compile cleanly with the old GTK libs (as a quick try with 0.9 revealed for me).

  327. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by severoon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, ctrl+shift+tab reverses the order of tab traversal. Or, you could use the earlier suggestion someone had of using ctrl+pgup and ctrl+pgdn.

    Come on, man...this is firefox! Nothing is impossible! :-)

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  328. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by asa · · Score: 1

    We'll stay ahead of the pop-up creators until pop-ups are a thing of the past. We've just taken another fix (post RC) that blocks the last of the known major category of pop-ups. We can beat them.

    --Asa

  329. Re:Still no MSI package - other Enterprise issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For example, you can easily change the home page of every user by simply creating a policy object and applying it to an Active Directory User Container that includes all of your users."

    And don't we just love looking at the company home-page for the millionth time when we want to start at Google?

  330. Killer Extension idea: Macros by cmeans · · Score: 1
    Has anyone seen an extension for FireFox that provides either a Key/Mouse stroke recorder, and/or simple Macros?

    This, to me, would be a great & killer Extension. There are a number of sites where I have to click the same buttons, drop downs, check boxes etc., just to get to a particular place...having the ability to replay those actions on a particular page would be a great time saver...

    Though some of the functionality might be restricted depending upon the quality of the site in question, it seems like this shouldn't be too hard to do...for someone who has that kind of time :)

    Taking this a step further, would be to use the Extension to scrape a site for key information that could be tied into something else (another Extension?), or maybe just a simpler page.

  331. Upgrade incompatibility by IamSorrow · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but everytime they release a newer version, it breaks most of the extensions I have installed and then I have to either fix them or wait for new releases, this is getting tiring. If you are going to release an upgraded product at least have the curtosey to insure that it is downwardly compatable with prior extensions, and give a little lead time to the developers of the extensions so that they can have newer versions at the ready.

    This will be the second time in 2 months that I will have to reconfigure Firefox to my liking, I would be willing to give up some of the customization that I am able to do if only for a stable upgrade path

  332. Performance... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
    If anybody is interested, I have a little non-scientific feedback on performance, if anybody is interested. I compared to IE running on the same computer. Initially opening a web page under Firefox seems slightly slower than IE, maybe 1/4 second. Total page rendering time seems to be about the same, experienced over several sites. I also ran the thing on a monster web scenario that I developed that does some heavy computation using Javascript, and Firefox literally blew IE out of the water. The site sends to the browser three list boxes of information with several hundred items each. The items are related, so javascript builds a relationship matrix, and then when you choose an item (or multiple items) in one listbox, it narrows the choices to related items in the other boxes. On both browsers, the second of javascript that builds the matrix is enough to generate the "javascript is slowing down your machine message." However, Firefox completed the rendering in 15 seconds as compared to nearly 25 for IE. But my favorite performance improvement is over what happens when I choose an item in one of the boxes. On IE, the browser freezes for about 3.5 seconds while calculates the related items and rebuilds the other boxes. Refreshing the entries back to their default takes nearly 9 seconds. On Firefox, clicking on an item in one box updates the other boxes almost instantaneously -- I couldn't even measure it. And the refresh procedure takes less than half a second.

    As I said, these results aren't scientific -- no controls, not enough samples, etc. But they are convincing enough to me that I may suggest that some of the people here use Firefox on the intranet as well.

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  333. and Tabbrowser Preferences by real_smiff · · Score: 1
    oops, i forgot to mention you also need

    Tabbrowser Preferences

    yeah it's three extensions instead of 1 but seems to work better for me.. anyway.

    i need a text file of addresses just to keep track of all the latest download sites for these extensions! arg.

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  334. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by severoon · · Score: 1

    Why not also consider "disambiguate the phase of the world line signifying the completion of a previous entity or action from the phase representing the commencement of a new entity or action"? Just a thought...I mean, if that's what you gotta do to keep emails from improperly being recognized as attachments, then that's what you gotta do, right?

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  335. Tack on Process Explorer... by SeinJunkie · · Score: 2, Informative


    In conjuntion with HijackThis, I use Process Explorer when supporting our customers. It's really invaluable for Killing Processes or Process Trees of spyware like Bubba.wintools that continually regenerate all of its files and registry entries if they are running.

    It's sad that we went from caring about how cookies affect our privacy to frantically trying to keep our computers free of extremely persistant little programs that are free to do whatever they want with your data.

  336. Actual Emails from Today by digime · · Score: 1

    My sister-in-law emailed me about all the spyware on her laptop, making it unusable. After some links to Ad Aware and Spybot....

    Me: You need to quit using Internet Explorer on your laptop to prevent getting more scumware than you already have. Get Firefox. http://www.mozilla.org

    Her: ...I did download Firefox and have it running instead of IE.

    1 point for OSS, but here I come for the win...

    Me: Of course you could put all this behind you and never have to worry again by installing Linux and not using Windows. I have a CD that boots Mandrake (without doing anything to your hard drive) directly from the CD-ROM drive. That way you can try it without deleting Windows. If everything works like you want it to, you can install it to the hard drive. Something to think about.

    We'll see how that turns out. I've done my part: http://www.spreadfirefox.com/

  337. Sunbird? by rulethirty · · Score: 1

    Anyone hear or know when will Sunbird be wrapped into this?

    (I understand it is a bit behind in development but should probably be at least an option in the bundle installation.)

  338. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by jonadab · · Score: 1

    > Thunderbird still needs to catch up to Outlook.

    Two words: Pegasus Mail.

    No, not open source, but it's $0, easier to use than Outlook, more featureful,
    and approximately eleventy hillion jillion times more secure. (Not only does
    it not spread worms without user intervention, it roughly triples the number of
    steps required for a user to execute an executable attachment of any kind,
    and one of the steps involves a scary-looking warning dialog box with the
    word "Virus" in the title. I've seen people get trojans from Mozilla Mail,
    but there is not a single documented case of this ever happening to anyone
    with Pegasus Mail.) I have most of my non-geek family using it. It's great.

    Personally, I use Gnus, but you can't tell most non-geeks to use that.
    Well, you technically *can* tell them to, but it's not a good idea.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  339. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by jonadab · · Score: 1

    What are the winmail.dat files, and what is their purpose, and what should
    the mailreader do with them? I don't recall ever seeing one...

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  340. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Piquan · · Score: 1

    Depending on what kind of web development work you father is doing, the Web Developer extension might be a lifesaver.

    Not to mention the DevEdge Sidebar. I use the MultiBar... all the references for web pages in one convenient, easy-to-reference table. It's what convinced a friend of mine to embrace the Mozilla.

  341. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by wx327 · · Score: 4, Informative
    winmail.dat files are generated by outlook. Sometimes attachments are also encoded in a winmail.dat file, which makes it really difficult for someone in an office running Lotus Notes to read.

    More about it here: http://www.gpc.edu/~jbenson/resource/winmail.htm

    I used WMDecode from http://www.biblet.com/ to decode some attachments my coworker received from someone outside the firm in a winmail.dat file.

  342. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you could use Opera, which behaves like that by default.

  343. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by nile_list · · Score: 1

    I love you Asa :-) Browsing /. with 1.0PR now. Unfortunately, I ran into one of the ugly format bugs that pop up every so often.. sigh.

    --
    Gnash Gnash Gnash
  344. Live Bookmarks - What were they thinking? by MarsF · · Score: 1

    Just tried out the Live Bookmarks feature in 1.0PR. I don't know who came up with this idea, but I think they missed some basic usability testing before including this feature. Here are just a few observations from a half-day of use:

    • Biggest problem of all, after loading up just two of my feeds I noticed that only about 1/4 of a headline is visible in the bookmark side-bar. If I expand the bar enough to see the whole headline I only have a quarter screen left for content. Moving the bookmark bar to the bottom wouldn't help that much, as I could only see a handfull of headlines at a time. Putting the folders in the Bookmarks toolbar doesn't help because the headlines are truncated to 50 or so characters, with no tooltip to view the complete headline when I roll over them.
    • If I have multiple feeds for one site how do I group them together? (C-Net and The Register both have about 10 feeds)
    • How do I tell which headlines are new? Or which headlines I have read?
    • Where do I set the update interval for my Live Bookmarks? Or the amount of time to retain an article? Or how many articles to show in the list?
    • How do I create a blogroll? Export my OPML file?
    • Why doesn't the RSS button include the option to subscribe to a feed using my default RSS Reader? Not everyone uses the Firefox RSS reader, and I think it is a poor option to force on the user.
    • Why doesn't the RSS button indicate the source of a feed? When I am on the Security sub-page of C-Net will hitting the RSS button subscribe me to the RSS feed just for C-Net Security, or for the aggregated C-Net feed?
    • What about article summaries?
    • How are the addition of article comments and/or updates handled or indicated?
    • The final nail in the coffin for me is that it actually slows down my feed reading by several thousand orders of magnitude compared to my normal reader (SharpReader). The user does not have the ability to take in an overview of all the feed data. What if I have 2000 unread articles in 50 feeds? How does the Live Bookmark scheme handle that?

    If you are an RSS freak stuck using Windows and haven't tried out SharpReader, I would highly recommend it. It is simple (read: no chrome), powerful, and it works. I also find that it handles bulk feed reading better than any other aggregator out there. I'm just waiting for the GTK# version or a good wxAnything version to come out so I can use it on Linux. As for Live Bookmarks, I am sad to say that it is the first feature for Firefox where I feel that it should have been left on the drawing table.

    Mars

  345. Thunderbird adoption problem by Trogre · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One problem with migration to Thunderbird from Outlook, apart from calendaring, is the ability to download Hotmail, MSN, AOL, or Yahoo! web mail. Mozilla doesn't do this.

    Not that I think it's a necessarily useful or even sensible feature, but the point is that a lot of other people do.

    On more than one occasion I have tried to encourage someone to switch to a less bug-ridden mail client only to be met with "But how do I check my hotmail?"

    Therefore, I'd like to see this feature introduced, not for functionality, but as a migration incentive.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  346. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, to be fifteen and to consider a gig of porn "loads"...

  347. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 36 and I already can legally buy drinks for women half my age.

  348. OT: battlefield survival by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

    sig: Kerry's own After Action report validates the accounts of the Swift Boat Vets

    Hint: If you're wounded and want to retreat, consider dropping any heavy weapons before you start running. Otherwise, you appear to be an opponent searching for a vantage point to fire rockets, instead of a non-combatant fleeing for safety.

    USMC in Iraq this year continue to follow the rule of firing on enemy with weapons, regardless of them being injured.

  349. TB spam filter rocks! by rdnk · · Score: 1

    Yeah, like is said in the other replies already, you have to teach the ham likewise the spam. But when it learns it's stuff, it works like charm! For example, my email forwarding operator http://www.iki.fi/ is currently testing spamassassin, and it marks the messages it thinks is spam with a *SPAM** in the subject. Well, it works fairly well, but it doesn't catch them all, some come into my inbox unmarked, but Thunderbird does catch them!

    And I've yet to see it miss a single message, or incorrectly marking it as a "Junk". Truly magnificent piece of software.

  350. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by dotlively · · Score: 1

    ASP.NET does tend to send different HTML to what MS terms "downlevel" browsers (everything other than IE and Netscape). For example, panels are rendered as DIVs for IE but tables for Opera/FireFox. It also renders things like Bold=True as CSS font-weight: bold; for IE but as tags for Opera/FireFox. You can get around this with a page directive clienttarget=Uplevel, which will specify that it always get rendered for "IE," meaning CSS and DIVs rather than tables and deprecated tags.

    I think there's also a problem with the client-side scripting generated by validator controls not working in anything but IE, but I never use them and instead just write my own javascript and server-side validation that I know will work in just about everything (I check sites in Opera, FireFox, Mozilla, IE, Avant Browser, MyIE2, Sleipnir, OffByOne, Netscape 4.7, Netscape 7, and Links).

    Relying on ASP.NET to do all the dirty work and generate all your HTML, formatting, and javascript probably will cause some nasty cross-browser issues, but if you are diligent then you can make a perfectly standards-compliant, valid, cross-browser, gracefully degradable web site with ASP.NET

  351. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Hooded+One · · Score: 1

    I knew about the lack of official GTK1 builds, but I didn't know that they were more or less busted. I was just going by the bug comments there, but I suppose those were referring only to SeaMonkey in that case.

  352. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Threni · · Score: 1

    I just downloaded this new firefox and it hangs on my athlon xp 2700 win 2k machine. tedious.

  353. I wish it was easier to file a bug report.... by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

    As I've just been to a website, which I refreshed a couple of times, then suddenly Firefox thought all my bookmarks were that site!

    Even viewing the properties of other bookmarks showed the properties of that site (which was also bookmarked).

    Maybe they should have a bug forum, which didn't require registration, where you could just file bugs, without having to go through the rules of Bugzilla.

    --
    #include <sig.h>
  354. Re:Still no MSI package - other Enterprise issues by Zirnike · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Example, you can easily change the home page of every user by simply creating a policy object and applying it to an Active Directory User"

    Solution: Don't Do That.

    Sheesh... The only reasonable reason for setting everyone's home page to the same thing (eliminating the point of a home page) is to prevent the browser from being hijacked and pointing to a porn site... And you might notice that's not a problem with Firefox.

    General rule: If it doesn't cause you any grief, and it makes the lives of the people who are trying to work with the program harder, and there's no legitimate reason to do it, don't do it. I can see locking down certain aspects of a computer. Some things that should never be locked down are instalation of utilities (WinZIP or equivilent, for example, or calculators, or unit converters) (if you're running on XP, this changes from merely bad practice to downright evil... Just lock down the system directory to prevent overwrites, but with XP, you can roll back even that), user preferances (desktop, font colors, and other things that people rely on changing for usability), time setting (this used to be a problem for me. The computer lost hours per day, and I didn't have access to set the time or load a utility that would allow automatic time syncronization), etc. All these make a computer less useful as a tool, reducing efficiency.

    (yes, this is a big pet peeve of mine. I had to spend 3 months trying to get permission to install software I needed)

    --
    I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
  355. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by abirdman · · Score: 1

    I just tried that, and my version of Thunderbird opens the link from an email in another window. Not as nice as having the option to open another tab, but at least you don't lose your place in the /. thread. I have to admit, I have started right-clicking every link, no matter what program it's displaying in, in order to open it in a new tab. Of course, this doesn't work in IE at work. It's such a good feature, it's become a habit.

    --
    Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
  356. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by avdp · · Score: 1

    My misunderstanding. When you (and him) say "ASP.NET" you're really talking specifically about WebForms. There is nothing inherently IE specific with ASP.NET, only with the crappy webforms in VS.NET (yes, I know, webforms are a core new feature of ASP.NET). I use ASP.NET without the webforms - I wouldn't touch them, and in my opinion, no respectable web developer would either.

  357. problems with search bar by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    the tweak that enables a longer search bar beside the address bar no longer works.

    Before, the tweak involves adding the following lines to userChrome.css:

    #search-container {
    -moz-box-flex: 100 !important;
    }

    Now, the bar's location does seem to change (left anchor), but the width is just the same.

    This happens on both windows and linux versions.

  358. Firefox e-mail link handling by Roark+Meets+Dent · · Score: 1

    I have Mozilla set as my default e-mail app in Windows, but when I click on mailto: hyperlink in Firefox, it always says "starting MS Word as default e-mail editor"!!! What gives?

    1. Re:Firefox e-mail link handling by brycen · · Score: 1

      Turns out Mozilla misregisters itself as the email client. Check http://bugzilla.mozilla.org for details. Use "Start Menu->Run" and enter "mailto:" to convince yourself it is not Firefox's problem.

    2. Re:Firefox e-mail link handling by Roark+Meets+Dent · · Score: 1

      I can't find it on bugzilla, probably searching wrong way. is there a fix?

  359. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1

    Ah. So is it an [almost] complete emulation of document.all?

    If so that could become useful, although it does tend towards the idea of not fixing the root of the problem! I assumed when I saw the changelog that it was just that the object now existed to "trick" any scripts that tested for its existance.

    e.g. you see a lot of scripts along the lines of:

    if (document.all) {
    // make the site function
    }

  360. Please share with your fellow web workers. by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I'm not the only one who wants to know:

    How the heck did you get the client to accept the 25 seconds of delay they probably see? I haven't had a client that would accept more than one, maybe two seconds of JavaScript-induced delay since the days when 28.8 was catching on. I'd really love to hear how I can make my client *love* the three second delay we have in our online ad layout engine (massive logical checks to ensure all generated documents comply with the CI and all those stupid EU laws concerning advertising, matrix built on load). Then at least they would stop whining while building more and more rules into it.

    --
    Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
    1. Re:Please share with your fellow web workers. by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      How the heck did you get the client to accept the 25 seconds of delay they probably see?

      It was actually quite easy. I explained to them the alternative interface that would not require a 25 second delay. I also gave them the option of purchasing new desktop machines at a cost of $10,000 each. The truth is, however, that when I first set this thing up, it ran quickly because there was a reasonable amount of data involved. When they started entering all kinds of data that I knew they'd never use, I warned them about what the consequences would be. I also periodically make the content "I wonder how much of that detail ever gets used..." to remind them that they've been warned.

      I haven't had a client that would accept more than one, maybe two seconds of JavaScript-induced delay since the days when 28.8 was catching on.

      The truth is that they aren't happy about the delay, but there's not much chance to improve it without a major revamp to the interface. Revamping the interface always seems to get the lower priority on the project list, and since they are the ones who set the priorities, they can't really point the finger at me.

      But yeah, a 25 second delay for anything on the client side should be considered unacceptable. There is some new technology available here for web development that would allow me to perform some of these checks on the server side with much better performance, but nobody wants to devote the time and resources to change platforms.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  361. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by tntguy · · Score: 1

    Get a rope.

  362. KeyBinding Help by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    So I'm running Firefox 1.0PR and find that my key bindings are drifting away from my emacs favorites.

    Now, when I start typing control characters in a text box, like this one here, weird things happen, like Ctrl-B makes my sidebar go away, etc.

    Is there a way to get around this nicely?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  363. No it's not lousy at all... by Phil+John · · Score: 1

    ...Thunderbird and Firefox are still preview software, things change & problems occur, that's why it's not a 1.0 release yet - we often forget that seeing as they are so useful and hardly ever crash/lose data etc. and are already at a much higher level than anything Microsoft can throw out.

    Now, if there are still problems like this after the 1.0 release then by all means flame away.

    --
    I am NaN
  364. I only ever get that error by Phil+John · · Score: 1

    when I'm on dialup. My ADSL connection is down at the moment due to a cock up at BT's end and so I'm relegated to a 56k dialup account at the moment and all of a sudden the problem that I assumed went away is back with avengance. I've seen it so far 20+ times today whereas I've seen it 2 times in the last year on broadband...wierd.

    --
    I am NaN
  365. Re:onions by changa · · Score: 1

    Tulip Bulb?

    Luxury!

  366. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Yolegoman · · Score: 1

    While I haven't seen this in version .93, in earlier versions, if you selected "Tools -> Options", almost every time option window would let you change options, all right, but after you were all done, it would not let you click "OK" and close the window. I had to ctr alt del to get out of FireFox. While a minor bug, it left me with doubts about the program. And seeing as if anything can go wrong, my mom will make it happen, I would rather have the program as stable as possible before having her use it, as I will be the one providing all tech support.

  367. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by dcam · · Score: 1

    You need two hands for that. ctrl+tab leaves the left hand to click links.

    --
    meh
  368. Re:Slashdot rendering warrants "MAJOR BUG" status( by jesser · · Score: 1

    I listed it as a "major bug fix" in the changelog I created. That does not mean that it was treated as a "major bug" before it was fixed, only that I thought it was a notable fix (at least for the kinds of people who would read a changelog).

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  369. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by digitect · · Score: 1

    Heh, nice reply. Speaking as a 37 year old, I almost tripped over my walker I was laughing so hard.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
  370. Re:Slashdot rendering warrants "MAJOR BUG" status( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else get this when clicking on the link? Copying and pasting the URL works fine...

    Sorry, links to Bugzilla from Slashdot are disabled.

  371. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

    Go to about:config and set middlemouse.contentLoadUrl to false.

  372. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by NeoChaosX · · Score: 1

    I've tried converting people I know, with some sucesses and some failures.

    In my family, I've managed to get my father and year-younger brother to convert. They're both scared of potential security threats, so when I told them Firefox didn't have the security holes of IE, they immediately switched. My 13-year-old younger brother is like many other failed conversions, unfortunately - he has refused to use Firefox simply because NeoPets once didn't display properly in FF. He's also a cynical, stubborn brat who calls Firefox spyware because it's a free program and wants to get under my skin, so I've considered the little runt a hopeless case. My mother hasn't tried it yet, although I installed the program on her system last time I visited her (she lives about 100 miles away) and I hope she'll notice. She runs IE 5.5 though and hasn't had any major spyware problems yet.

    As far my friends go, I have two who have used Firefox for awhile, and are loving it. I also have a guy who's sitting on the fence, and a Mac user friend who uses Safari. Ironically, I have a die-hard open-source-loving Linux friend who refuses to use Firefox since it's not out of beta yet.

    So yeah, my sucess/failure rate for conversion has been about 50/50. Not too bad considering how uninformed most people are about alternative browsers (or the existence thereof).

    --
    One man's selflessness is another man's annoyance.
  373. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by TheShadowHawk · · Score: 1

    hey! that's my sig!. :)

    --
    Friends don't let Friends use Internet Explorer.
  374. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by snilloc · · Score: 1
    Drudgereport.com sometimes (unreliably) produces a popup when a link is followed, even if it is opened in a new tab. I suspect though, that the javascript considers this "requested".

    And what's up with the floaty thing on netscape.com ? Not a true popup, but very annoying.

  375. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an admin for a network of about 350 users. Converting them to Firefox is generally no problem because I just switch browsers and change the icon and label and they just are happy. Why do I change the icon and label? Because the words "Internet Explorer" are sort of like "Kleenex". They expect the thing that shows them the internet to be "Internet Explorer". If you call it "Firefox", they don't know what it is. I install Thunderbird where I can. I say "where I can" because the two major problems I have in "selling" Thunderbird are the lack of a complete shareable calendar. By "complete", I mean that it handles meetings and groups and sends out reminder emails and all that. I have one department that is using the Sunbird calendar against webdav and like it fine, but they don't do meetings, etc. I can't get the HR or Sales types to use Thunderbird without a full-featured calendar. The second thing is that they want the address book and calendar to sync to their Blackberrys! Given those objections, they go right on using Outlook in spite of all warnings and I go right on spending a lot of time fixing "The location where your mail is delivered has changed" and "The mail server failed to respond" and all those other things that Outlook does so well. (It's odd that you can get "The mail server failed to respond" and open up a "Command Prompt" window and telnet to port 110 on the mail server and it slams back instantly with a banner. Duh...) So it's broken.. no one cares..it has a calendar and it syncs with a Blackberry.. Sigh..

  376. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Daengbo · · Score: 1

    I'm just young for my age...

  377. Cookies are no longer Delicious Delicacies by scurvy_lubber · · Score: 1

    They're now called "pieces of information stored by web pages on your computer". I liked the delicacies better. Luckily there's an extension to fix it!

  378. Re:you dont even need to install... its plain zip by upside · · Score: 1

    cos you know shit about install and deployment business and mumble about msi

    Ummm... You obviously are well acquainted with Microsoft server products and Active Directory. Read up on IntelliMirror/GPO-based deployment and SMS, then tell me who's the n00b.

    --
    I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
  379. Minor annoyance by RC_Car · · Score: 1

    It drives me nuts that there still isn't an option to turn off the alert on completed downloads (that shows up near the taskbar in Windows). It's annoying when I go to download something, go into a game, and then when the download is complete and that alert comes up it breaks me out of the game.

    I know I can go into about:config and turn the key "browser.download.manager.showAlertOnComplete" to false, but I'd like to see an option for it in the downloads section.

    Another annoyance I found is that it seems to block all of the popups on Gmail now, even if the site has loaded completely unless you put gmail.google.com into your allowed popups. I guess that isn't a big deal, but interesting to note.

  380. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Threni · · Score: 1

    Same here. Firefox just hangs upon loading. Nice one. Back to the previous version for me.

  381. Re:Still no MSI package - other Enterprise issues by cbo100 · · Score: 1

    ""Example, you can easily change the home page of every user by simply creating a policy object and applying it to an Active Directory User"
    Solution: Don't Do That."

    Yes I think locking down the home page was a bad example, better examples of group policy use were the other settings like security, etc. that IE exposes through the group policy. Even the proxy settings, try explaining to hundreds of users how to set proxy settings.

    Adding group policy support to an application is dead simple -

    - you just make a text based policy template containing all the settings you want to expose,

    - admins import that into the group policy manager,

    - it reveals a bunch of check boxes or text boxes for each option,

    - the admin applies the policy

    - the windows PCs pick up the settings and apply them into the registry,

    - the next time firefox is run it just needs to call a few APIs to check the settings and it is done.

    I had a prototype of this working for an application I used to work on in a matter of hours. If open source wants to be excepted in the enterprise they must support this. (I won't even go into how this is done on a linux machine as I have no idea)

  382. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
    Nope - I should make that, however "Of all the people whose browser habits I know, all of them use something other than IE". OSX is popular here on the west coast, with Safari accounting for quite a few.

    Out of curiosity, I'm now going to ask my cast what they use when we meet for rehearsals. That's a good range of skilled to non-skilled users, ages and backgrounds.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  383. too much time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that you all have too much time on your hands bitching about which browser to use.

    All of you who have problems with IE should try clicking "no" to those IE-addon install windows. Or, just cut down on your porn, and delete obvious spam.

    And you forget that alternative browsers are safe from this only because they are the minority. Convert too many, and you'll find you'll create the problems you're running from.

    g

  384. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by srcosmo · · Score: 1
    I've had many problems with Firefox hanging while doing Ctrl+Tab / Ctrl+Shift+Tab. It occurs mostly under Win98, but also XP as well.

    Has this happened to anyone else?

    --
    free speach
    Did you mean: free speech
  385. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

    What's the ".prn" stand for? pr0n?

    ND

    --
    This statement is forty-five characters long.
  386. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

    Do you, by chance, know of any spyware removal tools that do not need to be installed to be run? It's been a while but I seem to remember having to install Spybot & Ad-aware. I'm looking for something I can throw on a cd, just pop it in and run it. No installing required.

    ND

    --
    This statement is forty-five characters long.
  387. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by superyooser · · Score: 1
    HijackThis is a single file (183 kB) and doesn't need to be installed, but it's not as comprehensive as Spybot or Ad-aware. It scans the popular trouble spots on a Windows computer.
    The different sections of hijacking possibilities have been separated into these groups:
    R - Registry, StartPage/SearchPage changes
    R0 - Changed registry value
    R1 - Created registry value
    R2 - Created registry key
    R3 - Created extra registry value where only one should be
    F - IniFiles, autoloading entries
    F0 - Changed inifile value
    F1 - Created inifile value
    F2 - Changed inifile value, mapped to Registry
    F3 - Created inifile value, mapped to Registry
    N - Netscape/Mozilla StartPage/SearchPage changes
    N1 - Change in prefs.js of Netscape 4.x
    N2 - Change in prefs.js of Netscape 6
    N3 - Change in prefs.js of Netscape 7
    N4 - Change in prefs.js of Mozilla
    O - Other, several sections which represent:
    O1 - Hijack of auto.search.msn.com with Hosts file
    O2 - Enumeration of existing MSIE BHO's
    O3 - Enumeration of existing MSIE toolbars
    O4 - Enumeration of suspicious autoloading Registry entries
    O5 - Blocking of loading Internet Options in Control Panel
    O6 - Disabling of 'Internet Options' Main tab with Policies
    O7 - Disabling of Regedit with Policies
    O8 - Extra MSIE context menu items
    O9 - Extra 'Tools' menuitems and buttons
    O10 - Breaking of Internet access by New.Net or WebHancer
    O11 - Extra options in MSIE 'Advanced' settings tab
    O12 - MSIE plugins for file extensions or MIME types
    O13 - Hijack of default URL prefixes
    O14 - Changing of IERESET.INF
    O15 - Trusted Zone Autoadd
    O16 - Download Program Files item
    O17 - Domain hijack
    O18 - Enumeration of existing protocols and filters
    O19 - User stylesheet hijack
    O20 - AppInit_DLLs autorun Registry value
    O21 - ShellServiceObjectDelayLoad (SSODL) autorun Registry key
    O22 - SharedTaskScheduler autorun Registry key
  388. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    download OOo, convert all current documents, JUST to create a PDF?

    Umm, who said anything about that?

    Just open the file with openoffice, and click 'print'.

  389. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need two hands for that. ctrl+tab leaves the left hand to click links

    Umm, yeah, right.. is *that* what you're calling it now?

    "No mom, I can't unlock the door, I'm clicking links!"

  390. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by dcam · · Score: 1

    Speak for yourself. I personally don't surf the web for porn. I'm more interested in IT news, and using it as in information resource for programming.

    --
    meh
  391. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
    Hahaha!

    P.S. Don't sue me for copyright infringement.

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  392. Re:Mirror - Torrent by aonaran · · Score: 1
  393. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by TheShadowHawk · · Score: 1

    That's okay. I'm not an American. ;)

    --
    Friends don't let Friends use Internet Explorer.
  394. I'll wait for 1.0 by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    I'll wait for 1.0

    Though it never used to be the case, with the last couple of releases you have to redo all of your extensions and with the last couple of releases redoing the extensions has never gone smoothly.

  395. Re:you dont even need to install... its plain zip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are retarded.

  396. Automatic session saving by fractaltiger · · Score: 1

    Automatic saving is possible!
    Get the Sessionsaver extension (currently 0.2)
    http://extensionroom.mozdev.org/more-info/se ssions aver

    and it will ask you for a group name every time you quit --which is annoying for a default behavior, but you can click the checkmark box to do this autosave for you without requiring a name. Voila, your sessions will save seamlessly.

    --
    "Wireless : LAN :: Laptop : Desktop"
  397. Re:your mission, should you choose to accept it .. by Kamping_kaiser · · Score: 1

    The way to convert your parents is to rockup and install linux and FF on their PC. no MSIE for them...