Slashdot Mirror


Orwellian Tech Support

alteran writes "Here's a very well-written piece on what goes on inside a tech-support call center. Makes working for Initech seem good. Sorry about the forced ad-viewing - it only last about 10 seconds, and the article is worth it."

853 comments

  1. Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "We don't support that"
    We're not here to help fix your computer. We just want to get you off the phone. A tech-support slave tells his hellish tale.

    Editor's note: All names have been changed.

    - - - - - - - - - - - -
    By Kyle Killen

    Feb. 23, 2004 | Class officially started three hours ago, but our instructor has not yet arrived. This is not uncommon. By now many of my classmates have begun to bring cards, magazines and DVDs to pass the time. "The Matrix" is playing on someone's laptop and has attracted a small crowd in the back of the room. The fact that we're being paid largely to sit around and entertain ourselves has been the source of lots of jokes and smiles, but in the back of our minds we can't help but be concerned.

    Several people confess that they've never done more with a computer than check their e-mail. Others admit they haven't even gotten that far. An impromptu contest develops to see exactly who knows the least. There are lots of contenders. I'm listening to them battle for the crown of incompetence as I'm dealt a new hand of cards when a frightening thought occurs to me. Our clueless bunch is now part of the technical-support staff for one of the world's top three computer manufacturers, and in seven days we're going to be taking your calls.

    - - - - - - - - - - - -

    Ken is standing in the aisle, tethered to his cube by the spiraled umbilical of his headset, holding an unlit cigarette, and yelling. Ken is always yelling, and that's why we love him. Lots of us jot down Ken's more memorable tirades and compare notes on our breaks. Now, standing near my cube, screaming in the urgent and gravelly tones of a mid-40s chain smoker trapped in a non-smoking building, Ken tells a customer, "Quit whining and go get a damn screwdriver. I don't have time for this bullshit."

    None of us is sure how he gets away with it, especially considering that Ken saves his real anger for dealing with management. His conversations with the higher-ups all end with Ken screaming, "This is bullshit! Total bullshit!" and hanging up.

    We all understand why Ken is angry. We've been tech-support representatives for six weeks and already a third of our training class has left. A new crop of techs hit the floor last week, and two of them are already gone. It might be tempting to believe that the customers are driving the techs away, that they just can't take the stress of dealing with endless complaints and callers driven to near madness by interminable holds. But the callers just want answers. Ken, and those of us who are left, are angry because for the most part we don't have them.

    When we pick up the phone we're lying. We don't really work for the company we say we work for. Because of the expense of housing and running a technical support operation, many computer manufacturers choose to outsource the work. We work for one such outsourcer, though you'd never know it just to talk to us. To the customer on the other end of the line the distinction, while important, is invisible.

    Outsourcers are paid by the computer manufacturer based on the number of calls they handle. The more calls we take, the more the outsourcer is paid. So naturally everything that happens in this vast carpeted warehouse of cubicles is done with an eye toward speed. Our managers stress something called "average call time," which is simply the average amount of time a tech spends on each call. They want us to be under 12 minutes. Our phones monitor our ability to reach this magic number as well as the total number of calls we take, the number of times we ask for help, how much time we take between calls, even the amount of time we spend in the restroom. In short, your phone is always watching you.

    Twelve minutes can sometimes be difficult even if you know what you're doing. It is impossible if you don't have a clue. The stress of always being on the clock without really knowing how to do your job has already claimed a third of my classmates, and from the looks of the bulging vei

    1. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Funny
      Q: how many tech support personnell does it take to screw in a light bulb?

      A: i have a copy of the light bulb here at my desk and it works fine for me. are you familiar with the use of light bulb? okay, can you tell me which version of light bulb you are running - it should say either 60w or 100w on the top rounded surface of the the bulb itself. so, to check the version number you will need to remove the fixture if you have one. is the light bulb installed in a ceiling-mounted fixture light or is it for a desktop style lamp? okay?

      right, it appears as if you have the correct version of light bulb. there are a number of possible reasons why you are experiencing this problem. first, however, i need you to explain the nature of the darkness. is the darkness intermittent? is it partial or total? are there other light bulbs in your work environment that are displaying the same problem? are there other problems aside from the darkness?

      let's start with the simplest possible solution first. if you have a desklamp or other exposed-bulb installation, could you check to see if the appliance is plugged in. to do this, locate the black power cord at the bottom of the lamp or other installation and follow it to the end. you should find a plug connected to a socket on the wall approximately ten to fifteen centimeters above the floor.

      if you are using a ceiling or other permanent installation we'll have to test the switch. first, locate the switch. it should be attached to the wall and be from 1.25 to 1.75 meters above the floor. switches are usually located adjacent to doorways. now, toggle the switch up and down. is the darkness persisting?

      hm. is your installation battery operated? like a flashlight? is your installation on a timer or motion detector? is this a refrigerator light bulb? have you tried opening and closing the door? is the bulb florescent rather than incandescant? has it had time to warm up?

      okay, it appears as if the bulb will need to be changed. i'm going to give you an incident number. someone from physical plant will be by within ten working days to change your light bulb. please give him your incident number.

    2. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Did this really need to be posted? I'm all for avoiding the useless NYT logins whenever possible, for example, but Salon is a web-only publication and it doesn't hurt anyone to sit through a harmless ad.

    3. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by darkscorp · · Score: 5, Funny
      I personally enjoyed the description of different tech support workers:

      A punter is someone who gets rid of problems by giving them to someone else. Punters tell customers that their problem is not really with their computer, but with their software, their printer, their phone lines, solar flares, whatever they can make sound believable. Then a punter will look at the piece of paper hanging above their phone and read you those four magic words. We don't support that. If you want your problem fixed, a punter will tell you, you'll have to call someone else.

      Karen is part of a growing group called givers. Like punters, they don't really solve any problems, but instead of just asking you to call someone else, givers want you to have a parting gift. They'll listen to your problem and then randomly choose a piece of hardware to send you. Of course it won't solve anything, but givers have discovered that people usually calm down and start agreeing as soon as they think you're sending them something to fix the problem. And by the time they get the new part and discover it has no effect, they'll call back and someone else will have to figure out how to deal with them. Givers are really just punters with style, and they find their tactic very satisfying. Karen and her ilk get to spend all day playing Santa.

      Ted is someone I don't speak to. Ted is a formatter. Ted, and those like him, have only one solution to their customers' problems. Erase everything on the computer's hard drive and start over from scratch. While this can be effective for solving all sorts of software troubles, it's like amputating someone's leg to fix an ingrown toenail. The solution is usually worse than the problem. Most times Ted doesn't actually follow through with his plan. The entire strategy is just a bluff. Most people will balk at the proposition of losing everything and decide they can live with whatever problem they've called to complain about. At the very least they'll decide to hang up, back up their data, and call back -- at which point they'll become someone else's problem.

      This could be a fun quiz addition for e-mode.com: Which Tech Support Staffer Are You?

      I think I am a "Santa"
    4. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather login to NYTimes than watch an annoying ad on Salon.

    5. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hehe.... that was pretty funny.

      I read the entire post and never noticed.

    6. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Punter just means "consumer". I don't know the derivation.

      HTH

    7. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And in a tiny little way, slashdot kills the quality of information published on the web by removing the advertising revenue from the site which actually authored the material.

      Free information is useless if it's dead.

    8. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by cynicalmoose · · Score: 4, Informative

      A punt is a boat used on the Thames and the Cam (at Oxford and Cambridge), propelled by a pole. Hence to "punt" is to push around.
      A punter now means a consumer, but previously meant gambler, especially horse racing.

      --
      Exercise your right not to vote. thinkoutside.org
    9. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by m0nk3ym1nd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Was this full-length quote posted with permission of Salon.com? It was certainly done without attribution. Adding injury to insult, this unattributed posting has potentially deprived Salon of income, of which it does *not* enjoy an overabundance. The article is only available to Salon Premium members (I'm one) who pay a modest annual fee to view the usually top-notch content. If this is how we treat out friends....

    10. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Register has published glossary of its jargon It defines punter as
      Originally a term for a person who went to racecourses and put bets on nags (horses) in the hope they might come in and win and save their individual financial bacon, the term is now, in Britain, extended to anyone who makes a bet on anything, whatever - such as whether their PCs will work. A punter in Britain is not, as one of our readers pointed out applies in his country, a Canadian kind of boat.
      .

      A reckless, novelty seeking consumer, perhaps?

      Hear, of course, it's just someone who punts (kicks) their problem over to someone else.

    11. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I figured punter was refering to football. As in 4th down and 70 yards. Time to fall back and punt.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    12. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Savatte · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Q: How many protestors does it take to change a light bulb?

      A: None. Protestors can't change anything.

    13. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two. The hard part is getting them in there.

    14. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by K8Fan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Same here. I pay for Salon - I find it worthwhile, I read it every day, and it comes with an insane number of additional freebies - like a subscription to Wired. And it's not as if you're locked out of reading for free what I pay for. You just have to pay by watching an ad.

      I don't have the mod points I had yesterday, or I'd have modded the parent down. Sorry, but that's just not right. And it makes Slashdot readers look like a mob of freeloaders.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    15. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by pnutjam · · Score: 2

      Punter is a reference to American Style football where one kicks (punts) the ball when it is too close to your goal-line and the other side gets the ball on the next down.

    16. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by EyeSavedLatin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmm, why not just surf over to Salon to read this article? Salon.com is the only site I've ever paid for content. And I've found it totally worth it - the writing is top notch, and you're not going to find that in one of 100 +5 mods here. Overall their stories and reviews are great, their books coverage (my favorite part) is outstanding and news coverage is up to date about issues that people actually care about. Any news outlet that wants to chage for a premium service appealing to intelligent people would be wise to look at Salon's model. My 2 cents.

    17. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by djh101010 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...and yet, there are people (myself included) who are at this time poking around some site called salon.com, which I was previously unaware of. They might even get a subscriber or ten out of this, who knows.

    18. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by SamSim · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ken fixes their trouble whether they like it or not, regardless of how long it takes him, and when he hangs up the problem is solved. He's even received several thankful e-mails from callers who've endured his drill instructor's approach and finally gotten a much-needed solution.

      Something about this article said "bogus" to me most of the way through and this clinches it. Ken gave out his email address to the caller? Increasing his average call time by valuable seconds? Why?

    19. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Pxtl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe that punter referred to the American context of punting - that is, in football, when the ball is kicked back to the other team because they do not believe they can score a touchdown in this down, so instead will so instead will simply let the other team have the ball as far away as possible.

      Its a good analogy - "I can't do anything with this, so you take it and get it as far away from me as possible".

    20. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A punt is a boat used on the Thames and the Cam (at Oxford and Cambridge)

      Nonono, not the Thames. Okay, it's the Thames before it flows into Oxford, and it's the Thames after it flows out of Oxford, but while it's flowing through Oxford it's the Cherwell.

      Don't ask me why, I don't make the rules. :p

    21. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without attribution? It was labelled as a fucking mirror of the fucking article, which is on fucking Salon. How more obvious do you want it to be?

      As for depriving Salon of income, Salon is slashdotted. I couldn't have watched their fucking ad if I'd wanted to. That poster permitted me to read the article when otherwise I wouldn't have been able to. I'll go and watch the fucking ad later when they're not slashdotted any more; in the meantime, please stop bitching about something that isn't hurting anyone.

    22. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I get email addresses all the time, it's their work address. I've had anything from payment histories, account balances, and even the history of comments on their computer emailed to me.

      If you've ever worked in tech support, this is 100% true, even the guy who doesn't help anyone but has the best call times gets promoted part.

      --
      Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    23. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by The+Electric+Messiah · · Score: 4, Informative

      This article is spot-on. Typically there's a single blanket email address for customer complaints and compliments. Usually it gets forwarded to a manager.

      --
      "Bold as Love"
    24. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he was one of the few that actually fixed calls? Meaning he actually cares enough?

      Alternately, with the way tracking works in most cases, if a client emails the manager/whatever with a kudo's - it will eventually find it's way to the right Ken.

      From teh sounds of it, scenario 2 is more likely. Oh, and if you think it's bs, you've never worked a helpdesk before. I've worked in 2, and have visited (to assist with traning etc) many others. They are as widely varied as they come. The first one I worked at had an 80% first call resolution rate. This meant that you held forever, but when you actually talked to someone, 8 times out of 10, your problem was fixed. Another desk that I went to that claimed a 85% resolution rate considered "resolution" to be reffering it to the right place - their mandate was to have the client off the phone in 5 minutes.

      The first one hired geeks, technical people etc. The second in the example hired call center people and gave them minimal computer training.

      The one I'm at now falls in between, not total techie, not total call center, one twist of management will send this place one way or the other (hint: helpdesks CANNOT survive in the middle).

    25. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I shouldn't be too suprised that slashdotters don't know much about football. In football you get 4 chances to go 10 yds (excluding penalties and the such). After those 4 chances the ball is turned over to the other team. If after 3 chances you don't want to risk turning the ball over too close to your own end zone and you are not close enough to kick a field goal you can punt the ball on the 4th down and the opposing team gets the ball wherever it lands or is caught (and if they catch the ball they have the option of advancing it).

    26. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nope, you're wrong too: the Cherwell is a different river that flows into the Isis - which is what the Thames is called when it goes through Oxford.

      Latin Thamesis, truncated to Thames by some people and Isis by the others.

    27. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Curtman · · Score: 2, Funny

      To me punter will always be a file transfer protocol from my beloved Commodore days.

    28. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by thestarz · · Score: 0, Funny

      To "punt" is also a term used in baseball. It means to hit the ball very softly so it lands shortly in front of you. You then try to make it to first base before anyone can reach the point where the ball landed. Because the ball only goes a short distance there is no chance that someone from the opposing team will catch it, scoring a point.

      --

      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    29. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Can't really blame them for not knowing football - besides the nerd angle, US football is a US sport. Of course, I follow CFL rules where things work a little different from what you described.

    30. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by kfg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, however, this is an American article and is thus using the American definition of punt.

      The term punt comes from American football, where one kicks, or "punts" the ball downfield when deliberately handing control of the ball to the other side, thus making the opposing team have more ground to make up toward the goal.

      Such deliberate exchanges of ball control are part of the rules of American football, so punting is a stategic choice.

      In colloquial usage to punt means either to do something essentially random and see what happens, or to "kick" the problem to someone else, leading to the common American phrase, "When in doubt, punt."

      KFG

    31. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by kfg · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. The term you are thinking of is "bunt."

      KFG

    32. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In New Zealand, to "punt" means to gamble money on horses.

    33. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by the+arbiter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Only here only Slashdot, news for NERDS who don't know anything about sports. It's "bunt", not "punt". Fuck.

      --
      Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
    34. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And it makes Slashdot readers look like a mob of freeloaders.

      slashdot's readers ARE a bunch of freeloaders (oss, gpl, etc.)

    35. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Rhys · · Score: 1

      I "watched" the ad. That is, I tried to. Mozilla didn't like it. Not that it would have mattered anyway, I'd tabbed to other work to let the ad run it's 10 second course.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    36. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Bazzargh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which Tech Support Staffer Are You?

      I think I am a "Santa"


      You're sacked. I on the other hand am Rudolf the "who knows?" Reindeer.

    37. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1
      attention british people: please define "punter".

      You say its an American article and thus using the American definition. Look again at the sig (emphasis mine).

    38. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by thestarz · · Score: 0

      Well, you may be correct however I've heard it refered to as "punt". No doubt it changed forms at some point. Words have a tendancy to do that.

      --

      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    39. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > I don't have the mod points I had yesterday, or I'd have modded the parent down. Sorry, but that's just not right. And it makes Slashdot readers look like a mob of freeloaders.

      I don't know how to break this to you, but...

    40. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      It sounds awfully unreliable. First, there's always a chace that your delicate data will be harmed by the onset of a good hard kick. Then there's the issue of aiming. Will it actually fly between the uprights?

    41. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Wrong game. You "bunt" in baseball, and "punt" in football.

    42. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, it signifies that the article was writen in Tuscon, Arizona. In context, the writer was clearly using the American defintion of punt, and thus punter.

      Your milage at The Reg may vary.

      I perhaps composed my post somewhat poorly, not explicitly pointing out that I was supplying the defintion of "punt" to those who were not British, or otherwise not American, who might misapply the British definition to the article, where it would make little sense, implicitly recognizing that although the article might well be written by Americans and for Americans the web is, nonetheless World Wide.

      Thus, because England and America are two countries seperated by a common language, and English being the lingua franca of the web, confusion is oft the result, especially to those for whom neither English nor American are their first language.

      If my attempt to clarify only added to the confusion it was not deliberately intended to do so.

      KFG

    43. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Chilling, but not really Orwellian. It's more Heller-esque.

      In an Orwellian world, you're damned no matter what. In a Heller-esque world, you're only damned so far as you follow the written rules -- if you trump those and follow the ACTUAL rules, you can succeed quite well. Loni is a Milo Minderbinder.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    44. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by kfg · · Score: 4, Informative

      And I have heard the act of floating slightly above the ground refered to as "hoovering."

      Sometimes people just get mixed up over words that sound very similar.

      Bunt is derived from butt, to hit lightly. It is possible that it is a portmanteua word with punt, but there is no actual evidence that this is the case.

      Punt means to drop a ball from the hands and kick it. It does not carry the explicit meaning of to do so lightly, in fact generally opposite is the case.

      These are both also technical terms of sport, and their meanings have been rigidly defined in the rule books for over 100 years.

      KFG

    45. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Dictator+For+Life · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Something about this article said "bogus" to me

      Negative. This article is absolutely accurate.

      I don't know if other outsource companies do this, but Stream uses the title "mentor" for its second-level people (the tech support guy's tech support).

      I worked at Stream, and I can personally confirm that it is completely accurate in describing what life is like there. The metric for success is NOT "Did you solve problems for the customers today?" but rather "How many calls did you take today?" Nothing else matters. It was particularly bad in our group, because The Customer was really fastidious about checking over our shoulders. This meant that punters would be caught much quicker than average, but it also meant that we had two sets of almost mutually contradictory objectives: "Solve Problems!" and "Get off that phone NOW!!"

      Perhaps the most revealing story I can tell is the one about the staff meeting where our manager's boss was meeting with our manager and every tech on our team. Our manager was standing behind the Boss when a tech asked a Yes-or-No question of the Boss. Our manager immediately started wagging his head "No" and frowning, as though he thought it was a stupid question. In the next instant, the Boss said "Yes" and proceeded to expand on that answer. Almost simultaneously, our manager switched from a frowning "No" to a smiling "Sure!", wagging his head up and down instead.

      It was one of the most amazing brown-nosing performances I've ever witnessed.

      I can't tell you how happy I am not to be trapped in that dead-end job anymore, but if I absolutely had no other choice, I'd do it again. There's a lot of pressure, but no one ever asks you to take work home or work extra hours.

      --

      DFL

      Never send a human to do a machine's job.

    46. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1
      Wrong game. You "bunt" in baseball, and "punt" in football.
      You mean soccer?
    47. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by kfg · · Score: 1

      Ok, taking further chance at being punted around I'll take a crack at clarifying the British usage of "punter."

      Punters, as per the above definition, were disreputalbe warf dwellers. Uneducated, unwashed, unmoralled, and unethical. Pub dwellers, gamblers, cutthroats, defrauders, etc.

      Punter means essentially the same thing as "riffraff." Riff; a disreputable person. Raff: a huddled mass of people, see also "raft" to tie several boats together so as to form one unit.

      It has nothing to do with the act of poling a punt or being pushed around. It's simply a derogatory term for the lower classes.

      KFG

    48. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by martyros · · Score: 1

      Well, I watched the ad three times, but wasn't able to access the site. I think they'll generate enough revenue from people who click-through and at least try it, to cover the few how read this now-modded-to-zero post.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    49. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Stackis · · Score: 1

      can you spell m-i-s-s-i-s-s-i-p-p-i?

      --

      "Look where we worship" -- Jim Morrison
    50. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Clubber+Lang · · Score: 2, Funny

      4th and 70? That's field goal range man... why the hell would you punt??

      --
      Actuaries - making accountants look interesting since 1949
    51. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1
      it makes Slashdot readers look like a mob of freeloaders.

      Yup, that about sums it up.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    52. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by einTier · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Knowing that many Slashdotters aren't familiar with the rules of American football, and non-Americans possibly more so, I'd just like to add the following.

      Punting usually happens on fourth down. You have four downs to move the ball ten yards. If you cannot, the opposing team gets the ball where it lies. Also, typically the same players do not play offense and defense. So, by punting, you are essentially saying, "I've done all I can with it, this is no longer my problem." You are deliberately getting rid of the ball (problem) and handing it off to someone else.

      Also, punting often puts you in a better situation, as it gives the other team a much less favorible field position than almost any other kind of turnover. If you simply must turn the ball over, or are seriously concerned that you will, this is the best way to do it.

      Last, being American, I've never heard it used in the sense of "doing something completely random". It's almost always referred to in the sense of "getting rid of the problem by giving it to someone else", usually someone you don't like or don't know well or is in a different division (hence, not on "your team"). If you were giving it to a peer or co-worker, you'd probably use the term "hand off", which is how the quarterback (the player who initally takes possesion of the ball and controls the play) transfers the ball to the running back (usually a fast runner, used to move the ball forward by running it) on his team.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    53. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by chollowayss · · Score: 1

      I think either actually. football, soccer... american football, whatever. Anything where a ball is dropped from the hands and kicked before it reaches the ground. So really, I guess you could punt in baseball as well, if you really wanted to.

      --

      "The next generation of interesting software will be made on a Macintosh, not an IBM PC." -Bill Gates
    54. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by normal_guy · · Score: 3, Funny

      You need to accept cookies. That didn't solve the problem? You may need to reformat your computer.

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    55. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      Technically, they can.

    56. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Kagato · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like stream too. I would like to blame them for the problem, but companies like HP/Compaq and IBM monitor and make test calls. They know exactly what the score is.

      I worked at a call center that lost a contract to stream. The computer maker knew we were better than stream, in fact their own call QA person said we scored better than any other center, including internal centers that delt with high end business customers. But it's all about money. In our case, we could get under 12 minute calls, but weren't extracting enough $35 non-supported help fees.

    57. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      All this amount of self-promotion and whining, it makes Salon employees look like a mob of desperate beggers.

    58. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by rixstep · · Score: 1

      Totally brilliant. Thanks to the parent for putting it over here; thanks to the author for writing it; thanks to /. for bringing the topic to the public's attention.

    59. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A punt is a boat used on the Thames and the Cam (at Oxford and Cambridge)

      For those not in the know, it's definitely worth the trip to just watch the tourists with their punts and poles. Sometimes they go out two boats at a time and collide - and when they do, watching the frozen expressions on their faces as the boats get nearer and nearer - it's worth the price of the trip!

    60. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by letdownjournals · · Score: 1

      I don't know who this guy "Anonymous Coward" is, but he certtainly likes to stir up trouble...!

    61. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by kortex · · Score: 1
      Thanks for lessening my frustration with Salon's "Day Pass, Register or Die" site...

      I swear I have worked for the company this guy is writing about. Amazing that this is so widespread and continuing for so many years..

      1995 AUGUST - I'm employed by Unisys as outsourced tech support for Microsofts new Windows 95. Three months later the results from 6 partner companies are tallied. Who was number one in Cust satisfaction and resolution? Unisys' team was. Who had the average _longest_ call times - Unisys. Who did Microsoft cut as a partner in Dec of 95 (putting 350 techs back onto the street)? You guessed right. Unisys.

      I guess my point is: This isn't really a new trend - but it is a very accurate view into this particular little bubble of corporate despair. The only thing overlooked is lately the trend has been not only to outsource, but to outsource to India. And from my experience, english isn't necessarily a job requirement for these folks. So add another whole 'nother level of frustration for the customer in this loathsome situation when you have to ask them to repeat everything they say one, two or even three times.

      How to escape? Service is more important than software. Service is more important than hardware. Service is more important than damned near anything. For several years now, I base my vendor decisions on that precept and I find I'm reasonably satisified with things. You just have to be willing to do lots and lots of research.

      --
      -- kortex "Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts"
    62. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by karnal · · Score: 1

      4th and 70?

      Holy crap, your team sucks :)

      --
      Karnal
    63. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      I had to enable cookies, shut down my firewall and even try IE. I still could not get to the Salon site. I welcomed the copy of the article, and SALON can just stuff it. I would not have even looked at their site twice anyway.

    64. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a pretty rare punt that does fly through the uprights. We like to call that a "field goal."

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    65. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Only for vinateri, and only if it's a game-winning kick.

      -Chris

    66. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To paraphrase the BOFH -- you don't just win. Anyone can win. You demoralize.

      Scuze me, I have to turn over my excuse calendar.

    67. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 'British' English a punter is a customer of an (at least partially) dodgy trade, therefore punter makes total sense in relation to this article.

    68. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > the common American phrase, "When in doubt, punt."

      Do you know what "common" means? I have never heard that phrase in my entire life.

    69. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      I fear I'm a Ken. Years of calmly explaining to the lUsers at my school that no, the monitor cable is unplugged or no, I didn't break your keyboard (there's a guy who insisted on using Dvorak and never changed back afterwards) have done horrible things to my cute fluffy tech brain. Nowadays if I tell someone they need to reformat their hard drive, it's not cos I want to get them off the phone but because I hate them and all their kind. Die users! DIE!
      Ahem. I am fully aware that the above may qualify me for institutionalisation or, even worse, loss of karma...

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    70. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by hesiod · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      > You mean soccer?

      No, he does not. Duh.

    71. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by hesiod · · Score: 2, Funny

      > there's always a chace that your delicate data will be harmed by the onset of a good hard kick.

      It was a Commodore. Most times, a kick is how you fix the computer.

    72. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > it doesn't hurt anyone to sit through a harmless ad.

      No, but many of us are refused access to the article even after putting up with their annoying flash crap.

    73. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Free information is useless if it's dead.

      Well, thank God for us that information can't die, wanker.

      To rephrase someone else's sig, "You shouldn't anthropomorphize information -- it doesn't like that."

      My own sig is slightly appropriate, although not a whole lot:

    74. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you know, the "ad viewing" feature at Salon.com does NOT work. Like most other people, I view the ad and then find that the article will NEVER load.
      I e-mailed Salon.com about this repeatedly more than a year ago. I received nothing but contemptuous derision. Eventually I e-mailed the salon.com head of consumer services, who sneered at me and told me he was putting me in his kill file for pointing out that salon.com's "ad vieweing" feature doesn't work.
      I strongly encourage EVERYONE to repeatedly post premium Slaon content in the clear until Salon.com stops treating prospective customers like human garbage and fixes the chronically borken ad viewing feature, which does NOT work.

    75. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

      Yes! Thank-you! Catch-22 is a much better comparison than 1984.

    76. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1
      Yes, however, this is an American article and is thus using the American definition of punt.

      In this article, the punters are the ones being punted by the punters. Simple, eh?

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    77. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by kfg · · Score: 1

      I have never heard that phrase in my entire life.

      Until now.

      KFG

    78. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, welcome to the Information Age people. Copyrights have become meaningless with the advent of technology that allows infinite duplication at zero cost.

      Man, I can't wait until all the whiners are long gone so human civilization can continue advancing...

    79. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by DeputySpade · · Score: 2, Funny

      4th and 70?

      Holy crap, your team sucks :)


      My team is the Bears. It's a wonder they still have the ball.

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    80. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 1
      In colloquial usage to punt means either to do something essentially random and see what happens, or to "kick" the problem to someone else, leading to the common American phrase, "When in doubt, punt."

      In some engineering communities (such as MIT), "punt" can also mean just to quit, without necessarily punting "to" someone. For instance, "The last problem on the homework was taking too long, so I just punted."

    81. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      um salon is slashdotted to hell when i got here. its the same as any other slashdotted article.

      becuase they got you to pay for something the rest can get for free, whoes the sucker now?


      information wants to be free dude!

    82. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by kfg · · Score: 1

      The article did not refer to the customers as punters. It refered to the suppliers who evaded responsibility for handling the customers as punters.

      KFG

    83. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And John Madden says, "BOOM!"

      Got it?

    84. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean drop-kicking?

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    85. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Fuzzy+Bo · · Score: 1

      Oh, what a silly bunt! bau2.uibk.ac.at/sg/python/Scripts/ TheTravelAgentSketch.html

    86. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you spell m-i-s-s-i-s-s-i-p-p-i?

      E-m dash e-y-e dash e-s-s dash e-s-s dash e-y-e dash e-s-s dash e-s-s dash e-y-e dash p-e-e dash p-e-e dash e-y-e.

    87. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by theCobolGuy · · Score: 1

      I did tech support at a company that shall remain nameless. The article is true 100%.

      The last assignment I was on the software had major problems; it wouldn't do what it was advertised to do. We had to convince the customer that the problem was with their PC or Mac and we could not tell them it was a bug in the software.

      The caller everybody hated was when you told them to go to "Start, Settings, Control Panel..." and he would come back with "Where's the Start button?" The tech would put the guy on hold and yell out to the other techs "I've got him back!" I think he was a 90-year old from Tampa. I always told him to go find a 16-year old, explain the problem to the kid and the kid would be able to fix it in three minutes. He never did. He kept calling back, and kept being passed around from tech to tech. We gave up a long time ago explaining to him that it was in the lower right corner of his screen, and, yes, he did have Windows.

      Another time I think there was an outage of that ISP in a certain area (New Mexico, I think). The queues were overflowing with callers on hold. Some tech went into an empty cube, logged on and deleted all the calls! The queues would, of course, fill up a few minutes later, and the tech would do delete them again. This went on for a good part of the night. The next day the phones had been modified to make us log on with a password.

      Once I got my A+ cert, I started fixing problems the customers didn't know they had and my call times were still great.

      Doing that was great experience, but I am glad that I am no longer doing that.

      --
      Swedish Meatball
    88. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by clem.dickey · · Score: 1

      >> it makes Slashdot readers look like a mob of freeloaders.

      >I don't know how to break this to you, but...

      They say that "truth is an absolute defense against libel." If it is also an absolute defense against copyright infringement, then the original poster may be home free. ;-)

    89. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      Damn dude, you should have been logged in! I need good people for my friends list... Mod Parent Up...

    90. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by tdwebste · · Score: 1

      I have got zero karma. Kind of like the Ken.

      Corporate Tech support is a little different. The basic rule here is to monitor the client's system so that Tech support knows the problem before the client calls. This works great for Tech support, because they either quickly describ the problem to the client, or just sit on the phone an baby sit, giving them a constant status. Corporate clients seem to like baby sitters a lot, because they don't measure the time of the call. They measure the time from when they notice a problem to a solution. But the very nature of humans means if someone if on the other end making you feel good, you lose track of time. So onless the client diligent it does not get reported a problem, long time outage.

      As an operations admin, I use these tech support guys to the fullest. My workers for free. After a little "training" they make sure I get notified BEFORE management, giving me time to fix my mistakes. Management doesn't really need to know I made a mistake do they? And my loyal tech support guys, will gladly screw some else.

    91. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by TheGrayArea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This story is great. Man, there are some serious parallels to what I saw working support at MS. Punting was a really big thing in support there especially amoung the contract guys.
      We also had the "bullshit" guy who'd curse his customers but could fix anything. I once heard him trying to get a guy to hit his F8 key at the right time to go into safe mode saying "dude, hit the F8 key!! Bang on that sucker like your beating off on a picture of Pamela Anderson". The guy got into safe mode.
      He got fired about 6 months later when they started recording his calls. They got one of him talking to another guy there about which female managers they'd like to have sex with. Heck of a way to go.

      --

      This space for rent.
    92. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      wow, I'm retarded and didn't realize that this article was ripped off... please have mercy... :)

    93. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by TheGrayArea · · Score: 1

      I was at MS back in the day when Pro level VB calls were outsourced to Stream. We'd get all the escallations from the stuff they couldn't/wouldn't solve. Some of the "solutions" were insane. There was one group that would get the customer's to delete all *.ocx and *.oca files and a few dlls to try and resolve the issue. The end result was that this trashed VB and half of your windows apps and you had to reinstall.
      We actually hired some of the Stream guys to come in after their contract was cancelled. They told us great stories like one guy who'd transfer customer's he didn't like to a Chinese restaurant down the street.

      --

      This space for rent.
    94. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it makes Slashdot readers look like a mob of freeloaders.

      Slashdot readers are a mod of freeloaders. The real problem is thinking there's a problem being a freeloader. Let the Man deal with the problems of large groups of individuals bucking the System and not abiding by ancient rules of conduct like Law and Order. Alas, egoism prevails and Power is desired by all! Whoo-whoo!

    95. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dick!

    96. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      It also means the same in Rugby though there it describes more the style of kick. A punt is when you drop the ball from your hands and kick it before it hits the ground. The other kind of "kicking from hand" in Rugby is the drop kick in which the ball is dropped from the hand and kicked on the half-volley, i.e. it has bounced once on the ground. Skilled drop kickers, however, such as Johnny Wilkinson, the Newcastle and England fly-half, tend to kick ball at the moment (or just a miniscule fraction of a second after) it hits the ground, to improve accuracy.

      The tactical uses of punts and drop kicks are far beyond a short slashdot comment, let alone the offside rules which apply in such situations, which still make my head hurt after playing and watching Rugby for 35 years :-)

      The laws of the game are here if you are desparate to know

      I'm pretty sure that there's a drop-kick in Gridiron football as well but the only time I've seen it used was in the football game in the MASH film. Although I have a half vague memory of seeing it on a Monday night game once.

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    97. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post really made my day. I worked for this company for 4 years (2 years departed) and you really put tech support in perspective. I started as a tech, moved to mentor and then was a supervisor. At the beginning I loved my job, but as time progressed and the outsourcer was bought out by a major Canadian company, times changed and I became just like Ken. Most of the people we hired did not even own a computer. Many did not speak english. When the customer service jobs left the facility, all the customer service agents became instant techs. After nearly 4 years of busting my ass to keep my stats and accomplish all my work and the work of other lazy incompitent supervisors for fear of not getting my monthly bonus I chose to call it quits as well. Just like Ken, I realized unemployment beat working for these Id10t's Thanks again for the article. It was loads of chuckles. BTW, I pitty techs still trying to help people out there. Make it easy on yourselves and become givers. The customer will at least still appreciate you.

    98. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't bogus. Almost every company has a support@company.com general email address. A customer can very easily send thank you emails to those who helped them, without ever knowing the tech's personal address.

    99. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i work for a m$ outsource and i have said f*&@ average handle time and i FIX the ISSUE

    100. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Wifebert · · Score: 1

      I agree this article is accurate. I worked for AST doing tech support right before they outsourced to Stream. My friends still there told of the call tme pressure.

      Because of that job, I hate talking on the phone and do not go through the drive through unless I have to. I like the human interaction.

    101. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by megalonzerg · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      I have talked to all these people before on the phone. (Were you doing support for HP?) I always thought these were ignorant people putting something over on their bosses to keep their jobs. Now I find out their ignorance is actually created, fostered and rewarded BY their bosses.

      Thank you for this wonderful work. Besides being informative, it is pure poetry to read. I hope you do a lot of writing and a lot of people get to read it.

      - megalonzerg

    102. Re:Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also work tech support (for a large banking firm), and what surprised me is how much of this is true in an environment that makes its money based on the uptime of the customers we support.

      Management is greedy, they will justify their existence to no-end, even if it means costing the company money... but I digress, the reality is -- a helpdesk like the one described in this article would close us tomorrow, so some of the industry requires knowledgeable people or at least a unit who NEEDS to resolve the issue... onbviously, not all support is created equal. A large OEM PC manufacturer can get away with hosing their customers with lousy support easier than a multi national bank that needs to follow strict government regulations.

      Even with that being said, the existence of poorly trained and skilled techs exists on all levels of support, due in part to employee-protective labor laws and abused HR policies. I'd hope India, with less regulation on their workforce, may actually be able to terminate poor-performance employees. Unfortunately, what you need for performance entirely rests in the support philosophy of the company providing the support. This is where the problem lies.

  2. A disgruntled worker!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    What are the odds of that? I bet you can find the same for almost any position, big or small.

    1. Re:A disgruntled worker!? by millahtime · · Score: 1

      "A disgruntled worker!?"

      A disgruntled worker what??? Never... in my life have I met a disgruntled tech support rep. Oh, wait. I forgot. I mean never in my life have I ever met a NONdisgruntled tech support worker. I did it for 3 years. omg, to handle the stress and anger 90% of the workers smoked.

    2. Re:A disgruntled worker!? by kfg · · Score: 1

      This is true, however, certain positions, for various reasons, are more prone to create disgruntlment in a larger number of workers than is average. This is because some jobs suck. Some jobs suck moronically, i.e. without logical reason. These last seem to cause the most disgruntlement in the largest number of workers.

      Your challenge, Mr. Phelps, should you choose to accept it, is to find a gruntled tech support worker.

      This karma shall self-destrutct in 5 seconds.

      KFG

    3. Re:A disgruntled worker!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying that the article is fiction?

      How many tech support call centers have you worked in?

  3. Forced ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I didn't see any forced ad viewing?

    Maybe that has something to do with me using a well configured Firefox...

    1. Re:Forced ad? by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Funny

      I didn't see any forced ad viewing?

      Seems like the first two paragraphs is all the article-reading you can stand...

    2. Re:Forced ad? by irokitt · · Score: 4, Funny

      My "well configured Firefox" didn't stop the ads. So I guess you only read 2 paragraphs, huh? Don't feel bad, you still did better than most Slashdot readers do.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    3. Re:Forced ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops, my mistake. I think it's Slate that owned/was owned by MS. Mod me to oblivion.

    4. Re:Forced ad? by LMacG · · Score: 1

      > Oh well, Salon is (was?) owned by MS, they don't need the money. :)

      You're thinking of Slate.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    5. Re:Forced ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Slate, not Salon.

      But Salon sucks too, so they don't need your money after all.

    6. Re:Forced ad? by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1

      I suppose your statement is vacuously true, considering the server is slashdotted..

    7. Re:Forced ad? by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you don't have that silly flash/java crap enabled, hitting cancel skips right past any ads that might have been there :)

    8. Re:Forced ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I didn't see any forced ad viewing?"

      I had a look, but the advert page timed out after 2 minutes, so perhaps there's nothing but bare wires where their advert server should be?

  4. You can't get parts from India... by LostCluster · · Score: 1, Interesting

    One thing I've noticed recently is whenever I get connected to a foriegn-accented call center, all they can do is read the manual to me. If I actually have a broken part, they have to send me back to the USA to speak to someone authorized to get the part, usually by requiring me to call another number altogether.

    I guess we shouldn't be too scared of tech support being sent offshore... those aren't the knowlegable people anyway, so they're not exactly taking our job.

    1. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You Are Being Flamed Because

      [ ] You posted a Religious Thread
      [ ] You posted a accusation with no proof
      [ ] You posted a thread containing 1337 talk
      [ ] You posted a me > u thread
      [ ] you posted a worthless offensive thread
      [ ] You continued a long, stupid thread
      [ ] You committed crimes against pork biproducts
      [ ] You posted a "YOU ALL SUCK" message
      [ ] You haven't read the FAQ
      [x] You don't know which forum to post in
      [ ] You just plain suck
      [ ] You posted false information
      [x] You posted something totally uninteresting
      [ ] You doubleposted
      [ ] YOU POSTED A MESSAGE ALL WRITTEN IN CAPS
      [ ] You posted racist crap
      [ ] I don't like your tone of voice
      [ ] You are not civilized enough to post in these forums
      [ ] Yuo mispeled evry sengle wurd.
      [ ] Your parents are related
      [ ] You and your wife are related
      [ ] You dated my sister
      [ ] You dated my brother
      [ ] You made love to my dog

      In Punishment, You Must:

      [ ] Give up your AOL Internet account
      [x] STFU & GTFO
      [ ] Jump into a bathtub while holding your monitor
      [ ] Actually post something relevant
      [ ] Read the f****** FAQ
      [ ] Call Bush and inform him he sucks
      [ ] Go to your room with no supper
      [x] Apologize to everybody on this forum
      [ ] Go stand in the middle of a Highway
      [ ] Recite the Greek alphabet backwards
      [ ] Take a bath in bleach
      [ ] Drink out of a spitoon
      [x] Eat my ass
      [ ] Grind a rail on your sack
      [ ] All of the above

      In Closing, I'd Like to Say:

      [ ] 1 R 1337
      [x] Pwned
      [ ] GG no re
      [x] Blow me
      [ ] Get a life
      [ ] Me > u
      [ ] Never post again
      [ ] I pity your dog
      [ ] Go to hell
      [ ] Your IQ must be 7
      [ ] Take your s*** somewhere else
      [ ] STFU & GTFO
      [ ] Learn to post or f*** off
      [ ] Go jump into some industrial equipment
      [ ] STFU botter
      [ ] All of the above

    2. Re:You can't get parts from India... by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I guess we shouldn't be too scared of tech support being sent offshore... those aren't the knowlegable people anyway, so they're not exactly taking our job.

      You are looking at the whole situation from a very narrow perspective. Even though you consider yourself a knowledgable person (which btw I highly doubt), there are lots of american people who are losing their bread and butter because of call center jobs being transfered to India.

      And just because the job doesn't require toomuch knowledge doesn't make it any less important. The jobs and the money they generate contribute to the american economy. So your argument that it's not a worrying factor, is mute.

      The irony is I am an indian. The sad fact is quite a lot of the indians who work at call centers in india are in fact technology graduates and masters, and quite knowledgable. But they choose those jobs, simply because it pays their rent. And the lack of a familiar accent to american consumers is bring them a bad name.

      So the situation is not working in anybody's favour, neither the american worker's who lost the jobs,nor the indian techies who gained them. I guess the only winner is corporate america.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    3. Re:You can't get parts from India... by espo812 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So the situation is not working in anybody's favour
      I question this assertion. Read on.
      neither the american worker's who lost the jobs
      Who can either reeducate to get a better job, or who can transition into another job (our economy is expanding you know.)
      nor the indian techies who gained them
      I guess those Indians who are now able to pay their rent aren't gaining anything? As you said "But they choose those jobs, simply because it pays their rent."
      I guess the only winner is corporate america.
      Nay, the American consumers and Indian laborers gain. We, American consumers, can now purchase products cheaper. Everyone wins off that. And, as was perviously stated, Indians can now pay their rent working at a job of their choosing. So, who loses on this deal?
      --

      espo
    4. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Diego_27182818 · · Score: 1
      Play Frustration: The Trivia Game

      I thought your sig was particularly funny. Given the context of the discussion, I half expected to be trivia relating to tech support ;)
      --
      Warning, cape does not enable user to fly
    5. Re:You can't get parts from India... by caluml · · Score: 1

      I have no idea who LostCluster is, but what was Even though you consider yourself a knowledgable person (which btw I highly doubt) all about? Pointless troll.

    6. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about me, who gets to spend that extra money on something else that I actually need?

    7. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One thing I've noticed recently is whenever I get connected to a foriegn-accented call center, all they can do is read the manual to me.

      You got a manual? So much stuff these days comes with a manual.

      When I bought a 486 from Gateway2000 back in 1990 or so, it came with nearly 15 pounds of printed documentation.

    8. Re:You can't get parts from India... by avdp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The american consumer does not win in the long term. At best, it's a very short term gain. Sure he can buy something a bit cheaper today, but if the trend continues*, his own job will be going to India (or wherever) and he won't be able to buy anything tommorow (for lack of income), regardless on how cheap it is.

      The American economy may be expanding, but it's not expanding nearly as fast as India's or China's. The American economy is not creating jobs nearly as fast as it's loosing them.

      * manufacturing is all but gone from this country, and services are also leaving. From IT (programming jobs and tech support) to accounting no job is safe from an Indian worker earning a 10th of what his american counterpart makes. There is only a need for so many doctor (even that they can do remotely these days) or burger flippers.

    9. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, who loses on this deal?
      At the very least, the consumer trying to get tech support loses. The support is supposedly lousy (and tech support in general is pretty lousy, so it has to be worse than that. There's also a weird cultural thing going on when people from India are suddenly acting like they're in the US and trying to speak with US accents, taking on fake favorite sports teams, etc. Is that really a good thing for India?

      The economic picture is more fuzzy, but at the very least it's taking money away from US cities and sending it to India. That's not really in the interests of the United States, but it is in the interests of the Big Corps. The lipservice is of course that this all benefits the consumers, as if that makes up for everything. Gee, wow I can get the computer for $3 less because super-corp decided to outsource to India. Frankly I'm tired of all this malarchy about how everything benefits the consumer. Does extra cheap widgets from Super-Corp really make your life any better?

      --
      AccountKiller
    10. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And the lack of a familiar accent to american consumers is bring them a bad name.

      No -- what brings them the bad name is their inability to exhibit critical thinking skills and do anything beyond read from a script that's totally outside the realm of the experienced problem.

      For example, I have a Netgear FVS318 (several, actually). It would randomly reboot itself, and when it came back up there would be no network connectivity (LAN and WAN were both hosed). The only solution was to reset it (paperclip in the back of the machine)

      I call tech support, get India (the guy didn't have a "fake" American name even) and he suggests that I fix the problem by resetting the device. HELLO!!! DOOFUS!!! Did you listen? When I described the problem I said I had to reset it! What does resetting the device when I'm on the phone with you do that it didn't do the other 37 times I had the problem?

      THAT is what gives Indians a bad name.

    11. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Dravik · · Score: 1

      It should be mentioned that although manufacturing jobs have been dropping in this country for the last 40 years the actual manfacture of goods has been increasing every year. I believe this is generally called efficiency improvment.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    12. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Sevn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. I'm stealing and using that.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    13. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Kenja · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Who can either reeducate to get a better job, or who can transition into another job (our economy is expanding you know.)"
      So we should take out MORE student loans, go deeper into debt, lose more years of our life to train for another job that can just be outsourced like the last? Whats more, if the job market is expanding, how come there are fewer jobs? I've not seen ONE source that claims there are more jobs now then there where four years ago that is not scewing the results. What few new jobs there are, are all in the service industry. These are not the types of jobs we need for a strong economy unless you want nothing but CEOs and janators.

      "We, American consumers, can now purchase products cheaper."
      No we cant. All this is doing is lowering the cost to the company, thus earning the CEO and other managment more money. Prices are NOT going down because of this, proffits are going up.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    14. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Skapare · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You've certainly identified the real culprit here. Even before corporations started setting up shop in India to hire people for lower wages (which are probably great wages in India), it was very typical for corporations to misuse, or not even use at all, the advanced skills many people have. It seems they are doing exactly the same thing in India.

      There was a situation a few years ago when I lived in Dallas. There was a woman who I met who was wanting to learn more about Unix. Turns out she was being hired on an H-1B visa by Texas Instruments to be a Unix systems administrator. But she seemed to be a smart person so I asked her more about herself and found out she had a master's degree in CS, and the only experience she had with Unix is having logged in as a student user to a Linux machine a few times. So why would an American corporation hire someone obviously well qualified for more advanced work into a lower level job (run around and fix Sun desktops for engineers) she had no experience in? Obviously for cheaper wages (which, despite claims to the contrary, is easy to get away with using H-1B) is one of the reasons. But they probably could have her doing the more advanced work at the lower wages, too, so why not? Corporations also try to keep people down; maybe managers are afraid of being replaced by people that know more. But this has been a common practice for decades, to underutilize people's skills. It didn't change even with H-1B, and it won't change with outsourcing in India.

      I can't blame any Indians (or Chinese, or Russians, or anyone else) for wanting to find better work for better pay than they have been getting before. The real blame goes to corporate executives who just try to screw people over, whether American or Indian ... all for profit. People in America are trying to recover their own jobs, and it's quite obvious the only way to do that is a change of government, since the corporations themselves are obviously not doing it (and aren't expected to, since their loyalty is strictly to their shareholders). The saddest part of this situation is that it will breed some hatred for India and Indians that is not due, and may take years to erase.

      What I'd really like to see happen is that Indians get together and form all new companies that better respect people than the companies in America run by greedy fat cat scrooges, and end up not only putting everyone in India to work, but also end up coming to America and displacing these crappy companies we have here.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    15. Re:You can't get parts from India... by avdp · · Score: 1

      Efficiency is part of the equation without a doubt (as an IT worker at a US manufacturer, my job is essentially to eliminate manufacturing jobs through automation). But it's hardly the big picture. Go to any store (walmart) and looks for the "made in the USA" products. You can probably count them on one hand.

    16. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So your argument that it's not a worrying factor, is mute."
      You don't even know the difference between 'moot' and 'mute', why should I think that you know what you're talking about at all?

    17. Re:You can't get parts from India... by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The American economy may be expanding, [...] The American economy is not creating jobs nearly as fast as it's loosing them.

      You can't have it both ways. Either the economy is expanding (net job increase) or it's not (net job decrease or stagnation).

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    18. Re:You can't get parts from India... by ThisIsFred · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The irony is I am an indian. The sad fact is quite a lot of the indians who work at call centers in india are in fact technology graduates and masters, and quite knowledgable. But they choose those jobs, simply because it pays their rent. And the lack of a familiar accent to american consumers is bring them a bad name.

      Sorry, no offense intended to Indians, but I have a difficult time understanding the accent. Some accents I just have trouble with. But that really isn't the issue for me. The issue is that phone tech support can only fill the role of a live FAQ list. Seriously, the bulk of tech support questions could be covered by a few beginner's computing courses and a small handy reference.

      I'm sure the Indian call center staffers are intelligent and knowledgeable. The problem is that these big mail-order PC mega-corps dumped product at ultra-low prices and killed off the little local computer shops. Those places were actually the first line of tech support for these companies, and it didn't cost the mail-order companies one red cent. Plus walk-in or on-site was a more efficient way to solve problems, since the customer didn't have to sit there for hours and describe things to a support rep. My former customers (I no longer do PC repair) were more than happy to pay me money to fix a warrantied computer so they didn't have to call their vendor's tech support lines.

      So, I have two views on this. I'd like to see some of these mail-order companies endure a harsh consumer backlash. On the other hand, I'm kind of glad to see consumers put the screws to these big mail-order companies, and force them to keep their support promises. Along with this, Indians have job opportunities that otherwise might not have existed.

      I'm begging for a flaming here, but I'm not too worried about the Americans; When the average Indian can start a business in one day but paying $20 for a S&U Tax permit, and actually expect to make a living, then we can compare US jobs to Indians jobs.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    19. Re:You can't get parts from India... by joshmccormack · · Score: 2, Informative

      Who can either reeducate to get a better job, or who can transition into another job (our economy is expanding you know.)

      The recovery is considered a jobless one. And whether the economy is improving or not, being out of work stinks, and intangible improvements to the economy do not put food on the table or pay the rent. ...and Indian laborers gain.
      Maybe. I'm not necessarily saying there is no merit to offshoring, but keep in mind that other countries don't have the worker protections the US does (minimum wage, work hours, etc). Some might be as good or better, but no guarantee.

      And it looks like economies would benefit by higher income jobs, but globalization can do some wild stuff to economies, including making economies dependent on the global economy, rather than self sufficient.

    20. Re:You can't get parts from India... by leshert · · Score: 1

      You're missing a big point here.

      Before outsourcing: employ n knowledgeable technical support workers, who in total field c calls per day, of which c*k require the full extent of their knowledge (k < 1.0), and c*(1-k) do not (i.e., can be handled on-script).

      After outsourcing: employ some number of offshore technical support workers < n, who don't have to have as much technical knowledge, but can handle the on-script calls. Now you need some less than n knowledgeable support workers, since you're only handing c*k calls, and you're using the offshore support center to screen out the rest.

      Now, your n knowledgeable support workers are competing for less than n jobs, which means you can even decrease the amount you pay them: more supply and less demand leads to lower prices.

      I'm not saying this is a good outcome, or even what will really happen, but it's the logic that the purseholders are using.

    21. Re:You can't get parts from India... by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      If profits are going up, that means the company can afford to at least keep the prices the same, right?

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    22. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Lozzer · · Score: 1

      Economy expanding usually refers to something like GDP increasing. This can happen without creating jobs.

      --
      Special Relativity: The person in the other queue thinks yours is moving faster.
    23. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      So the situation is not working in anybody's favour, neither the american worker's who lost the jobs,nor the indian techies who gained them. I guess the only winner is corporate america.

      Short term, 'til they discover that there aren't enough Americans around with high-paying jobs to buy their product...and then they'll discover that India and and China or wherever aren't interested in our products, only our jobs and our $$$.

    24. Re:You can't get parts from India... by __aanebg9627 · · Score: 1

      There are more jobs in America than there were four years ago. However, jobs have grown at the slowest rate since the Hoover administration (that's the Great Depression, for the history-challenged).

    25. Re:You can't get parts from India... by djrogers · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So we should take out MORE student loans, go deeper into debt, lose more years of our life to train for another job that can just be outsourced like the last?
      If you went to college and got a degree just to work in a call center, you have far bigger problems in front of you than outsourcing....
      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    26. Re:You can't get parts from India... by mi · · Score: 0, Troll
      The american consumer does not win in the long term. At best, it's a very short term gain.

      What sheer stupidity! And "Insightful" no less...

      his own job will be going to India (or wherever) and he won't be able to buy anything tommorow (for lack of income), regardless on how cheap it is.

      Yea, we are all doomed, doomed! Unless we close the borders and stop importing things and services.

      no job is safe from an Indian worker earning a 10th of what his american counterpart makes
      I, for one, welcome the chance the Indian workers get from this situation. However, your understanding of economics is too weak to seriously argue about the prospects for employment in different parts of the world economy.

      "Globalization is the spice of life."

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    27. Re:You can't get parts from India... by GrigorPDX · · Score: 1

      I guess we shouldn't be too scared of tech support being sent offshore... those aren't the knowlegable people anyway, so they're not exactly taking our job.


      Ah, but they are. Why pay for a competent knowledge worker when the customers ignorantly tolerate an unacceptably low level of service from an under-trained offshore manual-reciting dude with a troubleshooting flowchart who works for 60 cents an hour? How long do you think it's going to be before they figure out it's cheaper to give the manual-reciter a part number list and a link to the parts warehouse than it is to pay for someone who actually knows what the hell he or she is talking about? "What's that? The part we sent didn't fix the problem? Well send it back to us (at your expense, of course) and we'll send you another one."

      As long as the average consumer continues to buy from companies with such pathetic customer service - which seems to be just about all of them these days - our jobs are most definitely in danger.

      (Still waiting on the slashdotted server so I can RTFA)
    28. Re:You can't get parts from India... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Really now? Exactly how much cheaper is it now because Dell or Microsoft has their support centers in far flung countries (i'll disparage no one by calling them thirld-world)?

      Last I checked WindowsXP still cost more than Windows 3.11, and OfficeXP was still in the stratosphere...

      ---
      Chris

    29. Re:You can't get parts from India... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      And the average pay of the new jobs that are being created in the US is down about 15-20%. That can not continue.

    30. Re:You can't get parts from India... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      you have to ask yourself why this is so? We perfected the shovel 100 years ago, and to make them now, we make them at a loss. So we go on to make more complicated things, like dialysis machines, CAT scanners, aircraft and ships. Fiber optics and other complex high-tech gear that other countries just aren't suited for building yet. Why should we dedicate manpower to steel production when it's better suited for building complex machines (other than the possible DDOS of not having steel readily available).

      Well, that and the american consumer has gotten used to the disposable goods economy. Cars, Electronics... We have made things so easy to make, that it's better to throw them away when they break, then to get new ones. False economy, at times, yes, but truth nonetheless.

      Witness Saran Cutting Sheets. It's easier to throw out a sheet after cutting dinner on it, than it is to bleach/wash a cutting board.

      -Chris

    31. Re:You can't get parts from India... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I'd like to take this moment to comment on great tech support. Promise Technology. Got me a quick RMA (next day shipping, my treat) on failed hardware. Total of 1fax, and 5 minutes of my time.

      Anyhow, what most people are missing is that this ISN'T sending money to india. It's all about putting more money into the pockets of big money in the U.S. It is *ENTIRELY* about shafting the American/European worker. You think that $30K tech support job is all going to India or Pakistan or China? Hell no. Try $10K. Where's the rest go? The bottom line. Better ####s for wall street, bigger golden parachute.

      And we WANT to put our social security money into a system so corrupt?

    32. Re:You can't get parts from India... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      What lines of work do you feel are safe from outsourcing?

    33. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Kenja · · Score: 0, Redundant
      I for one liked the old Usenet flame form that was going around about eight years ago. THe one with "Liar for Jesus" as a check box. Ah well, once more in Italian

      Caro:

      [ ] Idiota senza speranza [ ] Cretino [ ] Pirata
      [ ] Signor "Anch'io" [ ] Pervertito [ ] Pseudo Esperto
      [ ] Rompicoglioni [ ] Sfigato [ ] Lamer
      [ ] Troll [ ] Mostro [ ] Truffatore
      [ ] Utonto [ ] Bambinetto [ ] Postatore di Off-Topic
      [ ] Novizio smarrito [ ] Paranoico [ ] Inondatore di gruppi
      [ ] Spammer [ ] Fanatico [ ] Preadolescente
      [ ] Imbroglione [ ] Fallito [ ] Altro:_________________
      [ ] Tutto quanto sopra

      Sei stato reputato oggetto di flame perche:

      [ ] Non hai letto le FAQ
      [ ] Non sai cosa sia la NETIQUETTE
      [ ] Hai spedito files binari in un ng dove non e permesso
      [ ] Hai spedito un messaggio di prova in un ng che non e it.test
      [ ] Hai spedito un messaggio chiedendo di siti pirata
      [ ] Hai quotato un INTERO messaggio nella tua risposta
      [ ] Hai continuato un lungo, stupido thread
      [ ] Hai parlato a lungo di un argomento del cazzo
      [ ] Hai cominciato un off?topic
      [ ] Hai continuato un off?topic
      [ ] Hai postato un articolo del tipo: "fate tutti cagare"
      [ ] Hai spedito lo stesso messaggio piu di 5 volte consecutive
      [ ] Hai spedito un messaggio che diceva "NON VALETE UN CAZZO"
      [ ] Hai spedito banalita mostruose
      [ ] Hai detto "Anch'io" / "Sono d'accordo" quotando tutto il post precedente
      [ ] Hai spedito messaggi pubblicitari (spam) dove non e' permesso
      [ ] Il tuo provider e il peggiore sulla piazza
      [ ] Hai un nome/nickname/alias veramente ridicolo
      [ ] Hai una signature ingombrante ed inutile
      [ ] Hai spedito una idiotissima catena di Sant'Antonio
      [ ] Hai iniziato un crosspost inutile
      [ ] Hai spedito qualcosa in MaIuScOlE pensando che sia figo
      [ ] Non hai fatto nulla di specifico, ma il tuo agire sembra comunque cosi schifoso che ti sei meritato una bella flame a prescindere
      [ ] Non vali un cazzo
      [ ] Altro: _______________
      [ ] Tutto quanto sopra

      Come atto di contrizione devi:

      [ ] Disdire il tuo abbonamento a Internet
      [ ] Dire a tua madre che sei stato cattivo e che meriti una punizione
      [ ] Saltare in una vasca da bagno piena con il monitor acceso in braccio
      [ ] Spedire (finalmente) qualcosa di interessante
      [ ] Leggere le FAQ
      [ ] Essere l'ospite d'onore per un mese in it.fan.culo
      [ ] Altro: _____________________
      [ ] Tutto quanto sopra

      Concludendo, vorrei dirti:

      [ ] Informati prima di postare
      [ ] Levati dalle palle
      [ ] Non spedire piu nulla
      [ ] Invecchia di almeno 10 anni prima di spedire altro
      [ ] Provo pieta per i tuoi familiari
      [ ] Se tu avessi un cervello non sapresti come usarlo
      [ ] Vai all'inferno
      [ ] Vaffanculo, patetico coglione
      [ ] Vaffanculo, sfigato di merda
      [ ] Dacci un taglio
      [ ] Altro: ____________________
      [ ] Tutto quanto sopra

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    34. Re:You can't get parts from India... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Or the statement: I am NOT hanging up this phone until you give me an RMA number. No, I will not send one more email or fill out one more web form. Run down to your little RMA guy sitting next to the coffee machine and get me a number. ... fine, I'll be sending the damn thing back, getting the credit card to cancel the transaction, and you can work things out. <click>

      Not that this is limited to Indians... Plenty of American support lines can't do something so simple... <sigh>

      Whatever happened to "the customer is always right?"

    35. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You cannot even begin to imagine how big this H1B scam is my friend.
      Have you heard about these "Consultants" that will hire Indian(and other) programmers for your projects? These guys will get you a job regardless of your skill or experience. If you are an Indian recently graduated (in US or wherever), they will FABRICATE a resume according to the skills of the job required. I've seen people put "4 years exp in .NET" (sic) when they've only recently finished their MS. Some guys are smart and/or hardworking and once they get a job they manage to stick to it. But I have seen people thrown out in a few weeks because they did'nt know shit.
      That is why although consultants will take anything from 20-40% of the programmers salary they treat them like SHIT. While they wait for a job its not uncommon to see the consultants "helping" out by making 5-6 guys stay in a 2 room apartment. They search for ANY job and turn up one day and say "Ok you have an interview for a job about J2EE tomorrow, read all u can about it". One girl recently got thrown out in two weeks from AmEx. She had "eight years of experience".
      My cousin however, came here on a dependant Visa, got a job through a consultant(who got her an H1B),worked on 34K $ for a year or two by making sure she knew all that was required by the job. (She does not know what a Mac is or even Sun or AMD)
      I have yet to see ONE case where an H1B programmer was genuinely needed. Theres only one aim for companies when they hire H1B's : all for profit.
      For the record: I am Indian. And I will be desperate enough for a job when I graduate to go through a consultant.
      But I too do not like the hatred developing towards Indians in the US tech community. I would like to get hired because I am much better than an average American programmer, not because I work cheap. But I will work cheap if the job is really to my liking !
      Indian companies(ie based in India) have never done anything innovative in CS although many Indians have done well in American Universities and companies.(just start photoshop and see the credits for example). I do not think there will be innovation from Indian unless the local market develops. Most companies in India doing good work are branches of US/Western companies.(Intel, STMIcro, TI, MS ,Oracle etc)

    36. Re:You can't get parts from India... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Right, because all these countries want "made in " instead of "Made in "... oh wait... odds are that same mobo I just paid $100 is available for $15 in Taiwan...

    37. Re:You can't get parts from India... by ralatalo · · Score: 1

      Technical Support (and Customer Support ) have a huge turn over. It's a burnout job if you let it get to you, and if you're helpless it WILL get to you faster.

      Doing Technical Support when you get new interesting, one of a kind of problems is fun and chalanging.

      Doing Technical Support where you hold the customer's hand while you walk the customer though something that you have just done for the previous dozen callers, sucks.

      Doing Technical/Customer support where you can only tell the customer that you're sorry will just tear you apart.

    38. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Corporate America is the loser but only in the long run.

      Short run they can make their products and support them cheaper, so they make more money.

      Long run, American's will make less and they corporation will need to lower their prices to stay in the market. The corporation will also look to hire for more senior positions but they will have to hire from outside for these positions because they don't have the call center to screen/groom employees as an entry point. Or, alternatively they will outsource higher and higher levels of management and research as they really have a more difficult time filling the positions within the US and it makes more and more sense to move the jobs elsewhere. During this time the price they need to sell their product for keeps dropping.

    39. Re:You can't get parts from India... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>Sure he can buy something a bit cheaper today, but if the trend continues*, his own job will be going to India (or wherever) and he won't be able to buy anything tommorow (for lack of income), regardless on how cheap it is.

      Amen brother. Amen.

      When the mass populace begins to grok this then I think thigs will begin to change and the jobs will come home. I only hope that folks wake up before it's too late.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    40. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking sand-nigger.

    41. Re:You can't get parts from India... by ebuck · · Score: 1

      I agree, and remember this:

      The American economy is expanding at a rate lower than that of the American work force.

      So yes, there are more jobs this year, but there's also even more people fighting for them.

    42. Re:You can't get parts from India... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Actually it can, lets say you have a huge factory that kicks out 1000 airplanes a year (enough to be a meaningful part of GDP, say 10%). One day this bright kid figures out that if you switch the order from putting wings on while you attach the engines you could produce 1100 planes a year, same people puting wings on and putting engines on, they just work at the same time and you added 10% to production. You just expanded national GDP by 1% without a single new job, although you might want to give the kid a promotion. That's measured by productivity, and it has grown immensly in several segments (retail and finance have been huge beneficiaries of technology). Rather than having people keep track of and count shares or cans of corn a computer does it.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    43. Re:You can't get parts from India... by AeroIllini · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is only a need for so many doctor (even that they can do remotely these days) or burger flippers.

      Have you seen the kitchen of a McDonald's lately? The griddle they cook the burgers on folds in half like a waffle iron to cook both sides at once, so the patties take less time to cook (I imagine other fast-food places will follow suit, if they haven't already). The burgers don't need to be flipped. Even the American bastion of lowest-common-denominator-ism, the noble McDonald's burger-flipper, is now defunct. What is the world coming to, when even our stereotypes are becoming obsolete?

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    44. Re:You can't get parts from India... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Door to door sales, and plastics kid, plastics. On a more serious note, tech support was generally tough to get an answer from long before it was outsourced to India, since the goal was shorter call times. One job that might come into vouge is personal tech support. I knew plenty of people who scored beer money doing the occasional tech job, and have seen more than a few rent a geek operations start up, and remain in business. I would think that Joe user might be interested in paying a reasonable fee for higher quality tech support.
      One company that has always had tip top support is Bloomberg, I can't remember ever waiting on hold with them, and the staff fixes the problem even when problem exists between keyboard and chair. Of course at the prices they get, you better get something other than the script, if you work there keep up the great work.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    45. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure he can buy something a bit cheaper today, but if the trend continues*, his own job will be going to India (or wherever) and he won't be able to buy anything tommorow (for lack of income), regardless on how cheap it is.

      This is the same logic that resulted in the prediction that the earth's population would reach infinity around 2040. The job migration will be stopped as wages in [India] approach wages in [US]. Equality happens.

    46. Re:You can't get parts from India... by meatpopcicle · · Score: 1

      STOP the plunder by the pirate sector!

      --
      "You're on my side and the dark side, like Lando Calrissian?" --Gimpy, Undergrads
    47. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      typical libertarian dogma ;)

    48. Re:You can't get parts from India... by avdp · · Score: 1

      well, feel free to actually provide an ARGUMENT against mine. Or personal attacks will do fine as well.

    49. Re:You can't get parts from India... by avdp · · Score: 1

      To think foreign countries are unable to produce complex machines (like CAT scanners, etc) is very naive (if not arrogant) considering that a very very large portion of every electronic is made in countries like Taiwan, China, Korea and Japan (and other).

      I doubt the any CAT scanners is made in the US. Perhaps assembled in the US still, but it has nothing to do with the quality of the labor force.

      I suspect the only reason a company like Boeing does not build its planes abroad is a certain sense of patriotism (plus whatever government/legal pressure they probably get from keeping the operations in the US).

    50. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Harder. Indians are by definition Aryan
      and speak the Indo-European language Hindi/Sanskrit. Same language family as
      English and old German.

    51. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Xyrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure a lot of people have read Alan Greenspan's comments about how outsourcing will be good in the long run. Maybe I'm a little thick here, but this doesn't seem logical. Here are the facts as I see them:

      1. Companies outsource to increase profitability.
      2. Companies choose to layoff a majority of the workers, as re-education costs time and money.
      3. The market becomes saturated with unemployed skilled workers, as most companies have outsourced their positions.
      4. The unemployed skilled workers can not re-educate themselves, as they have little money to do so (most will try to keep their families fed instead).
      5. As more and more jobs are outsourced, unemployment rises.
      6. Consumer buying plummets as a result of less people earning money.
      7. The US economy grinds to a halt.

      This seems pretty obvious. The only way I see massive outsourcing being a benefit in the long term is if the cost of living in these countries rises faster than our economy slows down. Eventually a balance would be achieved, but at cost?

      Companies, at least nowadays, really could care less about the workers. It's all about the cash flow. And they will take whatever steps to keep their pockets overflowing with green.

      The American worker can not compete with someone who does the same job at a fraction of the cost. Even if the lower cost worker makes an occasional mistake, it is still worth it to the big company.

      We need a level playing field. And a lot better referees.

      ~X
      Random Quote: "It's easy to find an opening when your opponent is all asshole."

      --
      ~X~
    52. Re:You can't get parts from India... by avdp · · Score: 1

      Then it will move to Phillipines (already happening actually), then some other poor country, then another. There are plenty of poorer countries to last my lifetime, and my kids. That's maybe as far as I really care.

      I understand the earth will survive this, that's not really my concern.

    53. Re:You can't get parts from India... by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

      > You can't have it both ways. Either the economy is expanding (net job increase) or it's not (net job decrease or stagnation).

      Sure you can have both :
      - the economy is expanding, production is going up.
      - net job decrease

      It's very possible with an increased productivity.

      It is also a very dangereous tendency.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
    54. Re:You can't get parts from India... by swankypimp · · Score: 1

      I'm curious: in your experience, how many Indians have the stereotypical Indian accent? I went to college with a number of Indian exchange students and many of them had an English/British accent. Is one's accent determined by ancestry, economic class, or something else?

      --

      --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
    55. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      It's not the accent that throws me off, it's the "Thank you come again!" at the end of every call that freaks me out.

    56. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Actually most of that gain is artificial and is produced as a byproduct of GM and other manufacturers spamming the market. They say 'wow production is sky high' yet the demand isn't there. Read up on the subject and you'll see what I'm talking about.

    57. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Yeah sure, Japan and other asian countries *make* (as in manufacture) these high tech electronics, but who do you think develops and designs them? They do their fair share, sure, but alot of that design is American. I've got a few friends that work at prototyping factores and they mainly prototype US designs for fiber routers, etc.

    58. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      While you're right that efficiency and productivity is increasing, with certain manufacturing techniques, it's nebulous at best to actually measure.

      Technologies like flow manufacturing don't measure productivity in the classic sense. You can't say Bob built 2 more machines than yesterday, therefore he's more productive. You can, however, say Bob's line was flowing smoothly and it produced 2 more machines than yesterday. Then again without overhead (and building-to-order which is what flow is good at) productivity doesn't really matter at all. What matters is building specific units to order. If you get it right and make it on time, productivity is completely irrelevant.

    59. Re:You can't get parts from India... by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      It's not a question of effort. It's a shortcoming of my hearing. This has no bearing on the historical roots of the language.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    60. Re:You can't get parts from India... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      You're exactly right, I think most of the productivity gains have come from areas that were easy to mechinize (like finance and accounting which have been going to computers for decades) or where workers just work longer hours.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    61. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      technically, if you look at the 24month statistical avg of both the gdp and the job market recovery. then you compare *that* to the avg human poll/questionare in the last 2yrs, you COULD "have it both ways". the 1st shows efficiency and sacrifice, (in that order). the 2nd shows cost cutting and a low end of the totem pole view. there are many out there who have had to lose jobs and have been forced to take offers at 1/5 of their prior $. just so the ceo of hp/c*mpaq could justify his bonus.

    62. Re:You can't get parts from India... by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      Who can either reeducate to get a better job

      The problem is, we already had the better job.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    63. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Neoporcupine · · Score: 1

      > Does extra cheap widgets from Super-Corp really make your life any better?

      Don't fool yourself, nothing will be any cheaper. The share holders will make more money. "What the market can bare" is the cry of the all pervasive evil marketers.

    64. Re:You can't get parts from India... by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You want to claim to me that a country like Jamaica or Haiti is capable of supporting the infrastructure to build fiber-optic routers and CAT scanners and be competitive on the open market? Not today. 10 years, maybe 5 from now, yes. Fact: There are many countries (hint: not the G8) who are incapable of maintaining significant industry and being competitive in the world economy. No arrogance involved.

      As for Boeing, when your major customer is the U.S. government, you tend to do whatever they say...

      Cheers.

    65. Re:You can't get parts from India... by avdp · · Score: 1

      If you read the grand-parent you'd know we were talking about manufacturing jobs. The grand-parent made the (false) assertion that advanced technology can only be manufactured here.

    66. Re:You can't get parts from India... by deepvoid · · Score: 1

      : Who can either reeducate to get a better job, or who can transition into another job (our economy is expanding you know.)

      It isn't so simple. Getting reeducated in what? Computer science, electrical engineering, biotech; all of these are being outsourced as well, and not just at the bottom level, but all the way to the PhD level. When an entire field of study is made unavailable due to a lack of jobs, the country as a whole suffers from a complete lack of expertise in coming years. Why buy the latest software development system, if there will never be a paying opportunity to use it. For that matter, who will have money to buy anything if nobody has a job. The economic figures show an expanding economy, but only when corporate profits are taken into account. If you exclude corporate figures, which are predominantly external to this country, your get that dismal sinking feeling. The economy is degrading at a horrific rate, and is only being supported by the low price of products coming entirely from outside the US. How many people do you know who are out of work? If you take the number of people you know, even remotely, determine the percentage which are unemployerd due to outsourcing, the number will be larger than you expect.

      All around, corporations should be required to comply with all of the laws an individual must follow, and one of those is multi-nationals. An indiviual cannot work against the financial or military success of its parent nation without serious repurcusions, it's called treason. A multinational corporation, has no such restriction, they may sell weapons to whomever they want, as long as they are not on a short list of outright enemies. They can send jobs anywhere, and destroy an economy with a single selfish action. Entire wars have been fought to increase thier profits, with no military or financial advantage to the countries waging the war. If the really want to have the advantage of being "incorporated", ie: made flesh, they need to have the consequenses as well.

      --
      Fast machines, powerfull AI, impulsive invention,... All I lack is a good espresso machine!
    67. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Oh. Yeah. I knew that.

      *whistles and tries to play it off*

    68. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And soon no one will be able to afford a burger either.

    69. Re:You can't get parts from India... by avdp · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that EVERY country in the world could, and surely Jamaica and Haiti would be examples of countries that couldn't. Just that there are PLENTY or countries that can and do TODAY - and they're not all G8 either.

    70. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      Speaking of sigs, that warning is supposed to come from a superman cape, not batman. Batman can't fly to begin with, so it's not funny that way. It's not a very worthwhile book anyway.

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    71. Re:You can't get parts from India... by Lozzer · · Score: 1

      Were you replying to the grandparent there? Because you just reiterated what I said. However, you used language that made it appear that you thought the opposite.

      --
      Special Relativity: The person in the other queue thinks yours is moving faster.
    72. Re:You can't get parts from India... by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1
      is mute

      you mean, "moot".

      just being helpful :>

    73. Re:You can't get parts from India... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      What I meant was that productivity increases can increase GDP without changing the number of people employed. Case in point the past two years, in which employment has declined but GDP has increased.
      However, historically adding technology only really boosted productivity in a few selected industries. Over the last decade the big improvments in productivity have come in tech, retail, and finance. I've heard that Wal~Mart accounts for several percent of national productivity increases. I think it's easy to point to a big server that manages most of the information tracking in trading, to show how 10 people can do many times the work (measured in shares traded) that 10 people did in the 1970s in stock market trading (a few manage the server, which takes the orders rather than having people do all of that work). I added my speculation (in agreement with you) that an important part of productivity gains are longer hours by the same employees (who are measured as officially working the same hours).

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  5. Similar to my experiences... by M-2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I worked for a while for Stream International in Oregon, and I know people that worked for them in Dallas.

    And yeah, it was a grab-train-dump situation for the first week, and then you got tossed out on the floor.

    I got let go, and no one ever told me why. But the training and experience I got there - supporting Netscape 1.2 and 2.0 - was invaluable in getting my foot in the door at other places. It was a hell of a meatgrinder for me, but I lived...

    1. Re:Similar to my experiences... by barakn · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Stream employees in Kalispell, MT, knew why they were let go. Stream closed up shop there and moved to Canada.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    2. Re:Similar to my experiences... by dildatron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's interesting. I worked for a company that outsourced to stream (beaverton, or). You guys were tier 1 basically, and we handeled the calls that Stream couldn't solve. As the article mentioned, I found a lot of punters that just wanted to dump the customer on to me, but I would largely refuse if they had not done there were. After a while I began to recognize the major punters who just didn't care (Terry, I am looking at you, wherever you are).

      I was hard to blaim the lowly stream employees though, I knew they were graded heavily on call time (we were not), and I knew they were making crap wages. To them it was just a paycheck.

      Nothin has changed. The company I used to work for lost Stream and outsourced to another company outside the US, which I hear is even worse (but cheaper).

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    3. Re:Similar to my experiences... by M-2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was the location I was at - Beaverton, OR. And yeah, we were Tier 1. And god help anyone who needed to go to Tier 2 because we didn't have any real contact points for it...

    4. Re:Similar to my experiences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still work for Stream, in Beaverton, OR. Been here 3 years. This article is definitely written about Stream International, but I don't think it's the Beaverton site. And I think they're describing the HP support team. Luckily, the team I work for is nothing like this. Our client wants problems solved and doesn't care about "Average Handle Times" Posting anonymously for obvious reasons.

    5. Re:Similar to my experiences... by thomkt · · Score: 1

      I was on the Netscape team at Stream as well, a bit latter then you I'd guess. 4.0 had just came out, and support for 3.0 was dying.

      I was able to get one of the coveted email support positions, and was one of the last people on the team.

      Glad to know that there were other survivors.

      I'd guess the guy who wrote this article was also from Stream, given the support locations he mentioned.

    6. Re:Similar to my experiences... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Our client wants problems solved and doesn't care about "Average Handle Times"

      Could you please tell us who that client is?

    7. Re:Similar to my experiences... by dildatron · · Score: 1

      And I should have mentioned in my previous post that the main reason Stream couldn't solve a lot of problems wasn't the people, it was their really crappy training, and poor resources. We had very good training (I spent a solid month in training, and we had update trainings all the time). Stream just didn't have good training (too much money... if their employees weren't on the phone, they weren't making money).

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    8. Re:Similar to my experiences... by gentoo_moo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I worked for Stream in Memphis supporting a major Comupter vendor. Ack! The first day of class one of the soon-to-be techs asked "Where is the start button". I actually made it a year and a half at that place. My buddy worked there with me. I remember him asking a customer if he had "De-ionized his Frabulator yet?".

      The place was a meat factory and one of the most wretched places to work. When the phone wasn't monitoring you, this arrogant bastige at the front desk was checking the breakroom every 5 minutes asking what you were doing or your 'Team Leader' was listening in on your calls and critiquing you.

      We also had the "Average Call Time" but it was 15 minutes. Stream's answer to keeping the call time down was "Get themto start formatting thier drive and have them call back when they were ready for the next step..." WTF!

      Anyway, it's closed now. Has been for about 2 years I suppose. It was definately a learning experience. I learned I would never do helpdesk again. You helpdesk guys and gals are a tough bunch. Kudos to you. I think I'll sit at my desk and put my phone on Night Mode while I fill out my TPS report.

    9. Re:Similar to my experiences... by An+Onimous+Cow+Herd · · Score: 5, Funny

      wow - another Streamer!

      I've worked for Stream in N.Ireland, Dallas and Holland - and i can confirm the lack of training. Problem-solving was never emphasised, rather reduce call times and meet targets. I've supported over 7 major contracts for various manufacturers - and the absolute worst case scenario was 8 hours training in a product we were totally unfamiliar with, then thrown onto the phones. Talk about being thrown to the wolves!
      However, i can safely say that the experience i gained with Stream has benefited me in my career change to the legal profession, where i can bullshit and bluff with the best of them!

    10. Re:Similar to my experiences... by M-2 · · Score: 1

      I bow to your immense ability to spin crap into gold thread.

    11. Re:Similar to my experiences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well, I really can't, but we're a network hardware vendor not named Linksys or Cisco. :)

    12. Re:Similar to my experiences... by Sinistar2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When Symantec support (Eugene, OR) outsourced its legacy product support, that support went to Stream in Beaverton. I got picked to go train the new hires. By the end of the one week training session, I was still trying to convince a few of them that they would, at some point, have to learn how to edit the Windows registry (they had all had one week of Windows training before I arrived).

      While I had one or two people in the group experienced with computers, some were paralegals or people who were laid off from manufacturing jobs. Their re-education was woefully inadequate, and I can only imagine how frustrating it must have been for the customers.

      I should mention, however, that this was in '94, so I have no idea what the process or hiring pool is like these days.

    13. Re:Similar to my experiences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was with NSC in IL for a few years. USR moved Sportster support to Stream after us. Any SITELers from the East Coast? I wanna have some wordws with you about Palm support!

      - DRFSR

    14. Re:Similar to my experiences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's odd. Sykes choose to import techies from Canada.

    15. Re:Similar to my experiences... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Which *WILL* end up killing any brand loyalty your ex-company once had.

      Personally, I don't care if your black, pink, purple, indian or polka-dotted. If you can't understand the words coming out of my mouth, you don't get my business.

    16. Re:Similar to my experiences... by blacknight84 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tons of Stream people. Right now I work at ECE in oregon, who took over alot of Stream's contracts including Symantec (that's what I support now). And I could really see pretty much everything that article was talking about going on here. Hell, I watched as alot of the less capable people in my Traning class were thrown to the phones and get eatten alive by customers who wanted answers. I watch as techs who get through 40 calls a day at 5 minutes a call (expected time is 20) get praised when you know all the techs are doing is giving the customers a place to look for the problem and telling the customers to fix it themselves. I can't count how many times I get a customer say "I wish I had gotten you the first time I call". ECE has a quaterly Biz. report they make all the employies watch that is nothing but a joke. A really sick sad joke (89% turnover rate at the ECE facility in Tampa). But truly the worst thing about this is the fact that ECE earns $20 per Symantec Contact they take. And then they turn around and charge the consumer another 29.95 for support. So everytime I bill the person that calls for support ECE makes half my days pay. I imagine this is alot like what hell will be.

      --
      True words seem paradoxical.
    17. Re:Similar to my experiences... by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Moved up to Canada you say? ;^)

      Yeah, I work for Stream in Ontario, Canada, very large desktop contract, and they lie like crazy to you during training. But I'm not all that surprised. It's a decent job to have as a part-timer, and they (thankfully) don't care all that much about Average Handle Time (average time / call) here, especially if you can get a good CSAT (customer satisfaction survey) rating at the end of the day.

      I figure it depends on the company that does the outsourcing and the company that's outsourcing to them. In our contract, we try as much as we can to keep people at our site and away from the India site... I've had more angry customers because of something they've done wrong than from any other cause.

      Another thing was a bit after we were bought by Solectron, we started having MASSIVE turnover and were horribly, horribly understaffed (and the fact that this was happening in the middle of August when the Blaster worm had just started didn't help). That's fixed itself since then (and perhaps because there's rumours we might be "divested" from Solectron), but it does show that mergers are almost never good for the people actually doing the work (and by extension their customers).

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    18. Re:Similar to my experiences... by Enoch+Zembecowicz · · Score: 1

      I worked at the Stream site on Oregon for quite some time. Originally it started out as a good job, as long as you knew what you were doing you could get away with pretty much anything as long as you were actually working most of the time (crude jokes, etc). The company's mascot was one of those yellow "Bendy" things that Archie McPhee sells. All manner of bendies were made, bondage bendy, aborted fetus bendy (in a jar of water), Jesus bendy (crucified), and Stat Nazi Bendie (wore a German SA uniform and sat on top of the phone system monitor). At about the time when technical minded people stopped working there and more office-type people started streaming in HR started getting complaints about all the different humorous things throughout the office and made people get rid of them. The only reason for staying there (being able to do whatever you want) was gone, and I got out.

      --
      "Who's going to believe a talking head?" - Herbert West
    19. Re:Similar to my experiences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Large desktop contract...

      I'm guesing HP/Compaq in London. I'm on the other contract there and we're all about AHT right now.

      The thing about this article that made no sense to me was the QA aspect. The article was most definately exaggerated to go along with the general feeling computer users have about tech support (dumbasses, not helpful). I don't see how anyone who berated customers and swore on the phone (Ken) could work at respected call center for long.

    20. Re:Similar to my experiences... by Elimtevir · · Score: 1

      For me working with a spin off of Symantec still in Eugene OR i have a better experiance, Even wit an emphasis on time and number of calls, We tend to solve 80% of the calls first time and most of the others require a bit of time so a call back (free for the most part, to finish it up.

      Granted new techs tend to extend the time to fix, but with three weeks or so on software training and most techs over a year exp, I've seen little trouble in our office. Most if the Call Stats are ignored by the Techs anyway, I tend to just solve the problem and stats be damned. GOt uped to QA for my trouble as well, so seems to be working, AH! but time will tell what happens to us in the future.... But The article seems to be a BOFH snark-quest...
      I would refer folkes to: http://www.ernestcline.com/airwolf/techsup.htm

    21. Re:Similar to my experiences... by JayBlalock · · Score: 1
      Another ex-Streamer here. (Dallas) Got laid off last April, shortly before the Trinity site went away.

      I actually have nothing whatsoever to contribute to this discussion (didn't the article say it ALL?) but figured I might as well chime in with the other alum.

      I actually lasted 2 years, and only got fired because the entire center was going the way of the Titanic. I look back on it fondly, actually. One I learned the ropes, I discovered I could do pretty much anything so long as my AHT was low. So you could find me kicked back with my feet on the desk, Fark on the brower, a couple AIM convos going, with Pink Floyd playing. Hard to knock getting paid to surf.

      And the nice part was that I wasn't an evil tech. I was actually good enough that I could do my job AND deliver a call time well under the required. Which ensured that I never, ever got bothered for anything I did in my cube. Hell, I probably could've come to work naked and no one would've risked making me mad.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    22. Re:Similar to my experiences... by DanteKy · · Score: 1

      Give it time. That will change.

    23. Re:Similar to my experiences... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      You might be correct ;^)

      And I have seen one person like Ken in my time here, but I don't think he lasted long.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  6. eh???? by freerecords · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Here's a very well-written piece on what goes on inside a tech-support call center."

    Things go on inside tech-support centers?!? I thought they just put everyone on hold!

    --
    tim
    1. Re:eh???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how else can be finish our round of quake!

  7. Initech looking good? by whiteranger99x · · Score: 0, Funny

    Makes working for Initech seem good.

    "PC Load letter? What the fuck does THAT mean?!"

    Oh and don't forget the cover sheet for those TPS Reports :P

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
    1. Re:Initech looking good? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yea? Well, I'm suffering from a case of the Mondays...

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    2. Re:Initech looking good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey MP....Watch out fer yer cornhole, man.

    3. Re:Initech looking good? by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I believe you'd get your ass kicked sayin somethin like that man." :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    4. Re:Initech looking good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means you're out of paper. :)

  8. Nothing new here... Carry on. by stephenisu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's all true. I used to work for a certain government contracted tech support call center in Lawrence KS. Some of the people there couldn't operate a calculator, let alone a computer. Oddly enough, that's how HR liked it. If you put an idiot with a script in front of them on the phone, they may piss off people, but they are less likely to do any real damage. As apposed to the guy who thinks he knows what he is doing, and magically get's IE uninstalled on a win98 machine and all hell breaks loose (had to see it to believe it).

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    1. Re:Nothing new here... Carry on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As apposed to the guy who thinks he knows what he is doing, and magically get's IE uninstalled on a win98 machine and all hell breaks loose (had to see it to believe it).

      Well, thats the guy who knows just enough to be dangerous. Most computer users go through that stage - some just stay there longer than others.

    2. Re:Nothing new here... Carry on. by headonfire · · Score: 1

      it's not nice to talk about us that way.

      we.. know.. where.. you.. live.

  9. Worked in a call center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I originally worked for mindspring, they found that they got a better class of techs, who responded well on the phone when given a decent work environment; cut forward to 2 years later after the merger with earthlink. The new motto was low call times, let them call back. Costs rose, the work environment stunk, and most of the support personnel developed attitudes, not to mention that management developed a sweep everything under the rug attitude. Unfortunately call center phone support is getting to the point of burger flipping and telemarketing. A lot of friends complain that they know more about the product then the support personnel they are calling (some are semi-computer literate artists)

    1. Re:Worked in a call center by millahtime · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I worked at another ISP with similar problems. We were Voyager.net and then merged to Corecomm. After the merger it was no longer fun to work there. In turn a lot of good people left. There was a general lack of caring. In general there were more call backs, less satisfied customers and longer times on the phones overall.

      It actually proved to be more costly to have a cheap work enviornment that wasn't a fun place to work.

    2. Re:Worked in a call center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yep, I worked for Earthlick for about 6 monthe in '96, part time. The place would wear a hole in your soul. They had an LED message board showing the queue and hold times. They would go from green to yellow to orange to red according to pre-set values. When they went orange, the "leads" or supervisors would jump up and start trying to rally people to work faster.

      Then they started offering bonuses for "calls-per-hour". I wrote a dollar-sign on the little orange "Rls" (hangup) button on the phone because the more times I pressed that button, the more I got paid. I make a cha-ching sound each time I hit it. Got a big ol' bonus for it. They asked how I got so much faster and I told them it was because I stopped giving a shit. When told that wasn't what they were after, I reminded them that they were paying extra for it.

      Favorite lines:
      1) It's an operating system problem, call Microsoft

      2) Those modems are known to be flaky, call US Robotics for a firmware upgrade

      3) I can hear static on your phone line, call the phone company. You can't hear it? Yeah, it's typically on only one side of the line that's coming *from* your house, that's why you didn't know.

      4) Yes, we are aware of a problem at that POP, there's a tech team there now, try it again in about 30 minutes.

      Fun with Phones:

      1) Call tech support yourself and solve many of your own problems in 3 seconds or less, receive bonus. (It helps to work the very early shift so there's a greater chance of ringing your own phone).

      2) Your supervisor can see they you're on an "inside" call so make sure you call the 800 number.

      3) If you call in and you don't get yourself, make sure you get your co-workers on board to solve each other's problems - CHA CHING!

      4) This doesn't work because supervisors montitor calls.

      5) But your phone can only be monitored by one other phone at a time so go to an empty cubicle across the building and let it monitor your phone. Place a piece of paper under the handset so the phone sits in the cradle without hanging up. Enjoy the show as your supervisor calls in the phone guy and they keep glancing over at you. Ask them what's wrong and watch them squirm.
      ----------
      And in the end all they do is create more calls which they try frantically to take which creates even more calls - your never get ahead and you piss off all your customers.

      The salon article talks about outsourced tech support but Earthlick was screwing itself with this attitude in-house.
      ----------

    3. Re:Worked in a call center by Grandmaster+Mort · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I used to work for MindSpring too back in the day when we actually had a decent number of techs that knew how to fix the customers' actual problems. I was one of those techs who knew what the hell was going on, and thus I got to train newbie techs after they were done with their official "newbie training". Since the Eartlink "merger" (aka hostile takeover), corporate policy when down the shitter and slamming phone calls became the highest priority so that we could handle the incoming call volume. What they fail to realize is that slamming calls doesn't fix the phone queue since customers will call back in trying to get their problem fixed since the previous tech just gave them some bullshit troubleshooting steps and let them go to try it on their own. You see, if you actually fix the customer's problem, then they don't call back until they get a new problem (which usually isn't that often at all). "Just remember to kick phone butt every chance you get!" - Kwito Alas, most of the call centers between both MSPG and ELNK have been closed down because the phone calls are being outsourced to India, the Phillipines, and Jamaica. I just hope that ELNK customers realize what shitty service they have and dump their POS ISP.

      --
      si vis pacem, para bellum..."if you wish peace, prepare for war"
    4. Re:Worked in a call center by vDave420 · · Score: 1
      Sounds exactly like when I worked at a non-PC-oriented call center.

      North American Mortgage Company, a large lender (at the time) throughout the US, had God-Aweful support!!

      Everything you describe, from the LED board, to the techniques used to inflate stats (self-induced calls, self monitoring of calls, etc) were EXACTLY things I used to see or do there to benefit my OWN rediculous stats.

      Thee had multiple queues for various customers, that ranged (in usage) from constant usage to a few calls per hour/day.
      All the queue programming (which queues took what priority for which reps) was done on the *phones themselves*, and (Hahaha) they handed out a photocopy of the "initial setup instructions" when the system was created.
      Basically it was like: ##User#Ext#Queue#Priority##Queue#priority## etc...
      Since (for example) queue 1234 was the "common" queue and queue 420 was the "slow" queue, simply enterring "1234#3##420#1" would place you at "priority 3" for the main queue (basically a backup at that point, as all priority 1 & 2s had to be on a call first to route one to me) guarantee a nice, slow day of calls, producing 1 or 2 calls per hour or day. Since weights of averages were discarded (did you make 1 call at 60 seconds per call, or 1,000 calls at 60 seconds per call), this worked nicely. =)

      Nobody there seemed to care that individual "time-based" stats were being averaged, then re-averaged repeatedly without proper weighting! After bringing this up repeatedly, and getting just "shrugs" from non-math-ies, I just exploited it to not have to do any real work. =)

      --
      The pig browse. With Google. Sigh is to the chicken. Chicken is fool. Giggle. The DailyWTF giggle.
    5. Re:Worked in a call center by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1
      I worked in C/S for a major Mortgage Company and moved over into Training/Mngt. A staff with any brains knows how you did it, but they may not have cared. I was on top of all the little scams because I had a hand in developing most of them.

      Our software told us total number of calls, av length of calls, total time online vs. breaks vs. ACW, etc etc... If Mngt at that company hadn't figured all that out, they probably won't ever...

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    6. Re:Worked in a call center by tmortn · · Score: 1

      That merger tore the soul out of Mindspring. I had the best tech support experience back when there were a local isp in Atlanta. Installed a generic modem from some mom and pop custom shop that had a driver that was dumbed up. This was before I knew much more than how to turn the damn computer on. Wound up Spending more than 2 hours on the phone with a tech who finally resolved the problem using me as his eyes. It was a series of problems that would have caused an endless circle in todays tech support.

      Mindspring died when the Earthlink elements ate it from the inside out after the merger and all hope of resurrection was lost when they bought out Charles Brewer. Scary thing is, by most indications they are still as good as it gets on the national ISP scene.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  10. Yeah... by herrvinny · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm listening to them battle for the crown of incompetence as I'm dealt a new hand of cards when a frightening thought occurs to me. Our clueless bunch is now part of the technical-support staff for one of the world's top three computer manufacturers, and in seven days we're going to be taking your calls.

    Dell's support line was like this when I called them last summer... Hopefully now that Dell is moving call centers back home again, better service is just around the corner.

    1. Re:Yeah... by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The fact that Dell is one of the top 3 computer makers and that this call center is setting up to take over for calls that have to be handled elsewhere right now, leads me to start thinking that this call center will be where your calls to Dell are going to be routed soon...

    2. Re:Yeah... by irokitt · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought that only *special* customers got access to the English-speaking tech support, and the rest of us (err, the rest of you-I built my own box) have to slug it out with Ashok the incompetent until further notice.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    3. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No reason to assume that. Without doubt, the worst tech support i have received has been home grown. Which is saying something, giving the offshore support i've had the 'pleasure' of needing in the last couple of years.

    4. Re:Yeah... by gordguide · · Score: 2, Informative

      " ... Hopefully now that Dell is moving call centers back home again, better service is just around the corner. ..."

      Hopefully this isn't your personal computer we're talking about. One of the cool things that happen when you actually read the news articles is you learn what the story is about. Tech Support for Dell is moving away from India for Corporate/Enterprise clients only. Consumers still go to Banaglore.

    5. Re:Yeah... by PiVNeRT · · Score: 1

      Don't set your hopes too high. As a former Senior Dell Enterprise Tech (the title they give to anyone working 2nd or 3rd shifts) I can tell you that 99.5% of Client Tech support is still outsource. Although complaints have caused Dell to move 50% of their Client support back to the US, you still are talking to someone w/o a vested interest in fixing your problem.

      However, the Enterprise groups REQUIRE you to have at least 1 Certification. Techs are generally well paid and given much more freedoms on the job. generally they perform better too as they are told to screw the ACT, (resulting in LONG hold times) and fix the problem on the first try. They are even told to dispatch $300-$1K in parts per call. Dell has learned that if a client gets pissed and leaves it only lost $500-$1K. But if an enterprise customer even THINKS we are ignoring them they could be out a quarterly $1M-$2M.

      You see the problem is that there are so many client systems out there, that Dell can't afford to send everyone parts to fix their problem. The "primary focus" of a client tech is that magic 12 minute Average Call Time(ACT). That is why their AVERAGE problem takes 5 calls and 3 different dispatched of "suspect" parts. (As a client you cannot send more than 3 parts MAX.)

      So unless your company has 50+ employees and buys Workstations, Servers and On-Site-Setup, your probably still gonna get screwed by their tech when your systems break.

    6. Re:Yeah... by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      Yes actually, it was. I lost track of the number of times I got bounced around the phone tree. Sucks for me, I guess....

    7. Re:Yeah... by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

      HA! I've worked for the company that handles Dell's tech support in the states (actually, it's the same company that runs the call center Dell was using in India.) Don't get your hopes up. Just like in the article call time is the most important thing. Things like politeness, product knowledge, and customer satisfaction are way down the list on the call monitoring scoresheets, if they are there at all.

    8. Re:Yeah... by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      You sure? I thought they were moving the business and government support back to the states. Home user support is staying off-shore.

    9. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a right to demand a american tech support agent. If they refuse say you are going to cancel or return the item.

      I am Bellsouth Tier II tech and when my customers complain to me about there oem support in India I tell them to demand an american.

  11. 2 cents by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I ordered DSL, it had to be MSN. It never worked. But even as the Tech Support guys (in India) could not find the problem in their database (and therefor could not solve the issue, I just bailed on DSL for cable), they where polite and actually spent lots (LOTS) of time with me. Now the Comcast guys, they suck, tried to stick me with a "premium" install service charge even though all they did was drop off a box and a disc (my wife, the barracuda took care of them).

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:2 cents by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, you got the premium install from Comcast it seems. The only difference between their premium install and their standard one is the software-for-the-clueless package they give you on that CD.

    2. Re:2 cents by Anonymovs+Coward · · Score: 2

      Maybe the article only describes what US call centres are like. I've had pretty good experience with support staff from India (I could make out from their accents, and even smalltalked with them a bit sometimes). So that's another reason apart from cost to migrate the support jobs...

    3. Re:2 cents by jsmyth · · Score: 5, Informative
      Maybe the article only describes what US call centres are like.

      Heehee. I worked over two years in European tech support - based in Ireland - for one of the big three (at that time), and it was all true! One difference - in my section, we had laptops, so using laplink and a serial cable we could install games on our machines. Got rid of the frustration. But not the big brother attitude of the omnipresent phone stats and supervisors...

      --
      jer

      We may be human, but we're still animals
      - Steve Vai
    4. Re:2 cents by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You married a fish? Guess you never get to complain about her being cold... Comcast has awful tech support, a draconian AUP and no. fucking. clue. They are oversubscribing their loops (while vehemently denying it) and they will come to no good end, mark my words.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:2 cents by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      You married a fish?

      Yes, and she has sharp teeth. I shall forward her your address...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    6. Re:2 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was premium because you got a disk...

    7. Re:2 cents by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Comcast has awful tech support, a draconian AUP and no. fucking. clue. They are oversubscribing their loops (while vehemently denying it) and they will come to no good end, mark my words.

      You're kidding, right? They're slashing their operating costs by shafting customers who have no where else to turn, no way of proving they're getting shafted, and no recourse of action against getting shafted other that to not have cable modems, and you think this will end badly for them?

      Heck, that's a winning strategy in today's market! Customer satisfaction is utterly irrelevant in the world of utility companies.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    8. Re:2 cents by UnassumingLocalGuy · · Score: 1

      my wife, the barracuda

      You married a car? Well, at least you made one hell of a good choice.

      --
      "Hu, ho, ho-ah-oh-oh-oh. Hu, ho ho-ah-oh-oh-oh. Mario Paint! Whoaaa!"
    9. Re:2 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When I ordered DSL, it had to be MSN.

      Were you by any chance going through Qwest? They will flat-out lie to you. They have a contract with Microsoft to encourage customers to use MSN. They are required by law to let you use a different DSL provider, although they will charge $40+ per month just for the phone line (which you already pay for with your usual phone service).

    10. Re:2 cents by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      To be fair, not all MSN tech support is outsorced to India (yet), and with DSL, it will always be a line provisioning problem, if you want to actually get a DSL problem fixed, call your TelCo and tell them to "flip the switch" (they hate that) all MSN gave you was an email address and some useless software. Good job on the move to cable, I have never had a single issue with Comcast myself, but YMMV.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
  12. What's funny is... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've never had any of these supposed problems when calling any computer manufacturer's tech support lines. Is it how I somehow command the attention of the phone monkeys on the other end? Do they somehow become knowledgable or magically able to forward me to tier 2 if it says "Ayanami" on the caller ID?

    I highly suspect this is a bogus/fluff article: you know, an amaglamation of a bunch of interviews and war stories about the worst call center conditions imaginable.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:What's funny is... by M-2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If I got a call on the line that indicated it was from Ayanami Rei, I'd give her the best damn service available.

      Because, you know, if I didn't, she might come step on me with EVA-00. And that would suck.

    2. Re:What's funny is... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I will attempt to help back up the article with a resounding "yes, a call center is meant to take a lot of calls, not solve problems".

      See, I work in a generic call center. We do our own support here for member accounts (non-technical) and we attempt to bring in farmed work from other businesses. When the management goes to talk to companies, they automatically reject anyone who says they want quality numbers. They come armed only with quantity. Average call times are to be under two and a half minutes and full time reps are required to take over 200 calls per day lest they be put on the chopping block.

      There's two benefits to this approach: 1) management can claim a high quality call center to prosepective outsourcers based on the fact that we take a lot of calls and 2) H.R. can keep average salaries low by firing people who are not meeting quality standards and unrealistic quantity standards. Effectively, the only way to make these mutually exclusive goals is to remain as generic and unhelpful as possible. I was once told flat out by a caller that I'm "really good at saying nothing in as many words as possible". Trying to solve a person's problem inevitably leads to complexity which slows down call times which leads to a meeting with a manager.

      Don't blame me though... I'm just a code monkey now, nobody listens to me.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    3. Re:What's funny is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm not a regular poster here.

      but I spent 2 years as a phone tech on MSN contracts. the company was called Envisionet.

      the article is not far from the mark.

      our training was better. but that was about it.

      I started on MSN dialup.

      the attitude was take the call, be polite, make your records, give a single fix, have them reboot and try to connect. and do all this in 6 minutes or less.

      when I was put on the MSN broadband contract (just 2 weeks before California's MSN broadband supplier went bankrupt) we had call times of 12-15 minutes. it was pure heaven to be able to actually fix something. (yes, I'm an experienced computer tech. been in this business since the days of the Apple II (not Plus, not e,just II ))

      but for the average call center technician? they really only have phone answering training. not actual support training.

      Corwin

    4. Re:What's funny is... by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      Sorry to say it, but I experienced EXACTLY identical situations working at a major phone company as tech support/sales. The whole story was a disturbing and somewhat depressing case of Deja Vu.

    5. Re:What's funny is... by egomaniac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The article is an accurate description of some call centers. The (very large and well-known) company that I work for outsources its tech support to Houston and India, and we have had a ridiculous number of complaints from our customers regarding the poor quality of our tech support. Everything I have heard here fits with what that article described.

      We have been working hard on turning the situation around, with some success. My wife ran into a problem with her account a while back, and in light of this I decided that I would try to play customer rather than just getting the responsible engineer to fix it. The people I talked to were helpful, courteous, and didn't have a frickin' clue how to solve the problem. The standard response was "we changed something about your account, but it won't have any effect for a few hours. Check then, and call back if you're still having a problem."

      I went through that three times before I just had a coworker fix it. Sounds an awful lot like the experiences described in the article.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    6. Re:What's funny is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's really sad is, I worked at one of those call centers right out of HS, and there were a bunch of people who had been there for 5 years or more who still didn't know shit. They were pumping out 80+ calls a day, not solving anybody's problem, and didn't care. And this was an in-house call-center. I got out fast.

  13. Orwellian? by CaptainAlbert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Orwellian? In what way?

    I'd have said Kafka-esque, perhaps.

    --
    These sigs are more interesting tha
    1. Re:Orwellian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Since you asked: in the way that grabs people's attention and stirs up privacy concerns.

    2. Re:Orwellian? by Bish.dk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Orwellian? In what way?

      Perhaps it was this quote that made the submitter think of "1984":

      Our phones monitor our ability to reach this magic number as well as the total number of calls we take, the number of times we ask for help, how much time we take between calls, even the amount of time we spend in the restroom. In short, your phone is always watching you.

    3. Re:Orwellian? by mrdogi · · Score: 1

      I'd say Orwellian in that Big Brother (telephone) is always watching you.

    4. Re:Orwellian? by ISPTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Having just read 1984 again since it is bandied about so dang often, I'd have to agree the Orwellian aspect of the situation isn't there.

      Don't just use the phrase and assume you know what it means. (I'm not referring to Cpt Albert, but the Orwell comment) Read the book Michael.

      Tech Support managers that emphasize low call volume is where any industry should go to research bad examples of "Management"

      Take a subjective topic like anything someone would call for technical support and try to apply "METRICS" to it to be able to grade employees. So it's my fault if the customer is a moron and I still want/try to help them? No thanks.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    5. Re:Orwellian? by sphealey · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Orwellian? In what way?
      1984 is not Orwell's only work. Read Down and Out in Paris and London and Politics and the English Language for starters.

      Admittedly, "Orwellian" is most often applied directly the 1984, but not always or exclusively.

      sPh

    6. Re:Orwellian? by John_Sauter · · Score: 2, Informative
      Orwellian also in describing a disconnect between what is expected of you, and what you are told (in the training video) is expected of you.

      On a higher level, Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-four exaggerated the effects of loss of privacy to send a warning, and the message has taken root. The author of this piece likewise wishes to send a message about the foolishness of paying for technical support based on the number of calls handled per day, without any quality metric. I hope the necessary people read this story.
      John Sauter (J_Sauter@Empire.Net)

    7. Re:Orwellian? by SharkJumper · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I'm thinking Dostoevsky, in the Notes from the Underground sense.

      SharkJumper

    8. Re:Orwellian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Oceania, telescreen watches you!

    9. Re:Orwellian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Convergys:

      1) breaks are when they tell you they are (and they changed weekly). If you had an emergency break then you were docked from your score sheet which ended up hurting you at "raise" time.

      2) schedules were horrible. I worked a 1600 to 1730 start window. Any thirty minute interval in there I was to start. It was usually 1730 to 0200. This could change weekly. Trying to get vacation was like pulling teeth. I was told "I didn't walk through my college graduation so you don't have to either. Request denied."

      3) computers were monitored to see if you were surfing the web. That included surfing the web looking for mapquest for a customer on the phone that had no idea where the modem drop off point was.

      4) phones were monitored. You were clocked on when you logged in and out for breaks, meetings, in and out. The time on the phone was consistently 3 minutes off the time on the punch clock. I am convinced it was to create a stressful/confusing situation for the employees and force them to lose about a half hour of "own time" daily.

      5) stupid applications were forced upon the employees. Ones that were difficult for 99% of the people to understand (I wasn't included in that). It created hassles for call times just so that they could have another excuse to fire you.

      6) training was good but the emphasis was on "get them off the phone." Whether that meant sending to T2 or getting them so frustrated w/you that they either hung up or asked THREE TIMES for a "supervisor" (no other word would suffice, ie manager).

      7) Good people were let go because they were a "raise" risk. God forbid you ever have a "good agent" move up in the ranks. That would mean that you would have more of a clue than anyone else.

      Yes, I was "let go". I am not really bitter. My supervisor knew my hatred of the place. I was actually waiting for it so that I could concentrate another 8 hours a day on finding a new job.

    10. Re:Orwellian? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      When I was working as at an outsourced call center for Dell, after taking a terrible call that involved some bad level 2 support, I curled up under my desk and turned in to a giant beetle.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    11. Re:Orwellian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admittedly, "Orwellian" is most often applied directly the 1984, but not always or exclusively.

      There's also a little book called Animal Farm some people might remember.

    12. Re:Orwellian? by orac2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I cried when they took Ken the Screamer away to make him into horse glue.

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    13. Re:Orwellian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never actually -read- Orwell, have you? Or studied English?

    14. Re:Orwellian? by danila · · Score: 1

      Take a subjective topic like anything someone would call for technical support and try to apply "METRICS" to it to be able to grade employees.
      It's a fallacy of a capitalism-driven economy that everything should be measured. I would recommend a different approach. Create a corporate culture of helping customers. Get good employees. Pay them well and create good working conditions. Let the only metric be the percentage of problems solved for the customer and let it be shared by a group of employees. Encourage mutual support where the more knowledgeable employee would help others handle the issues. Solicit customer feedback. Interview stuff regularly to find out who is trying to cheat the system instead of helping the customers.

      Develop a brand. Turn the customer support from a cost-centre into the quality that helps sell more computers.

      I don't think I will buy more Samsung products (that that is possible) or anything from a small shop I was a frequent customer of (this one is extremely unlikely), after they made me wait 2+ months for a replacement HDD covered by the warranty (still don't know when I will have it).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  14. Clueless? No surprise by mytec · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked doing tech support at an ISP some years ago. Once I gained more knowledge I moved on to bigger and better things. It cannot be easy to hold on to talented tech support persons for the relatively low pay they receive vs the stress of dealing with irate customers and the pressure of keeping call times down. Most probably move on like I did.

    1. Re:Clueless? No surprise by PoitNarf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I couldn't agree more. I was working for Vonage earlier this year. Most of the people in my training class were from technical schools that weren't very good. Very few people there actually had a BA/BS in Comp Sci or other computer related degree. I only lasted there for about 2 1/2 full working days after the training was over. It just wasn't worth it dealing with cursing customers and only getting paid around $12/hr. At least I learned a thing or two about VoIP from the training. Since then, I have been infinitly more patient when calling my ISP tech support. They need all the friendly callers they can get.

      --

      "0101100101? It's just jibberish. *looks in mirror, gasps* 1010011010@!? AHHHHHH!!"
  15. depends on the company by Em+Emalb · · Score: 4, Informative

    some are all about speed, some are about quality.

    Why is this news?

    Yeah, mod it flamebait, but you thought the same thing.

    Some companies give bad tech support. News at 11.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  16. Re:Name Called Out By The High Tech Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, our support contract doesn't cover attacks by the high-tech machine. Have you tried rebooting ? Have you re-installed Windows with the CDROM that came with the computer ?

  17. For anyone too lazy to read the entire article. by bad+enema · · Score: 5, Funny

    The last three words does suffice pretty well.

    "Bullshit. Total bullshit."

    And we wonder why computer illiterate people always come to directly to the geek in their life for help whenever something goes wrong.

    1. Re:For anyone too lazy to read the entire article. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      And yet, how often does said geek receive money, food, sex, or return expertise for (sometimes) hours of work and expertise?

      I'll bet doctors get a lot of the same. "Say, Fred, my arm's been hurting and I figured that while you were here..."

    2. Re:For anyone too lazy to read the entire article. by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 5, Funny

      I get laid everytime I fix my wife's PC :)

      Unfortunately for me, she runs Linux. /ba-da boom!

      --
      There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
    3. Re:For anyone too lazy to read the entire article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lady I helped basically install a brand new computer and transfer all her files to the new computer from the old one over the course of 8 hours for only a measly $200 actually called me at home the other day. She lives 150 miles from me. She swindled my mother-in-law (her friend) into giving her my ph# so she could get her computer fixed. Get this: She actually wanted to know how to get her speakers working again. Mind you, the first time I fixed 'em it was because the volume was turned all the way down and the plugs in the back (color coded!) were not plugged in correctly.

      I swear, if you can't MATCH UP FUCKING COLORS then you don't deserve to operate a calculator, let alone a brand new computer!

    4. Re:For anyone too lazy to read the entire article. by waters · · Score: 1

      > I get laid everytime I fix my wife's PC :)
      > Unfortunately for me, she runs Linux. /ba-da boom!

      If that's not the perfect reason to switch from Linux to Windows...

      There's a switch-commercial here...

    5. Re:For anyone too lazy to read the entire article. by Diaspar · · Score: 2, Funny

      wow, you scored with your wife, what an accomplishment


      (the above was meant sarcastically)

    6. Re:For anyone too lazy to read the entire article. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sheesh. I'll be on the lookout for the personals ad:

      "MWM seeks SF for good times. Must have unpatched copy of XP Home. No smokers."

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    7. Re:For anyone too lazy to read the entire article. by liquidsin · · Score: 4, Funny

      I had the "blowjobs for tech support" clause going with an ex. Of course, I was smart enough to install Win ME on her system, whereas you seem to be an idiot ;)

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    8. Re:For anyone too lazy to read the entire article. by TGK · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're clearly not married.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    9. Re:For anyone too lazy to read the entire article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to install some Windows games for her with Wine, and she'll likely wear your dick away.

  18. Never had bad tech support calls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No seriously, I haven't. I've had people who were obviously reading off a flow chart of possible solutions, but never been palmed off with bad information.

    Ok, so maybe it's be cause I'm technically competent so I don't phone up with the usual cup-holder problems, I only phone up when I know something's broken, and I can usually get fasttracked to a higher level of tech support by telling them I know what I'm talking about. Dell were incredibly good about this and even flagged it as a note on my record.

    On a sidenote: Format and reinstall is the biggest cop-out ever. Guy that do this are the biggest muppets I know in tech support - McDonalds staff usually have a better handle on what they're dealing with...

    1. Re:Never had bad tech support calls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've never had bad or good call experiences, i just and listen to classical music for a couple of hours.

    2. Re:Never had bad tech support calls... by Benwick · · Score: 1

      You're amazingly lucky. I'm not in the slightest bit a computer idiot, and I always end up calling tech support as a last resort. Then I spend the next hour or so detailling all the ways in which I already tested the problem, while they read me all the answers in the built-in troubleshooter in Windows, whose solutions tend to be fairly obvious to geeks (and unworthy of the cell phone bill to call tech support). And if I dare mention that I'm actually using Linux (dual boot, really) they immediately tell me "oh, we don't support Linux." Not supporting Linux, frankly, is kind of understandable, but the way they jump to tell you and rush to hang up the phone is rather telling...!

      My last bad experience was with Earthlink about three nights ago... 'round midnight when I came home and needed to send an e-mail. The internet connection had simply vanished--except it worked on a different computer when plugged into the cable modem. After much hardware fooling-around (all the hardware, thankfully, was working just fine), the only explanation I could conceive for the problem was that they had locked out my MAC address somehow. Five minutes into the online chat conversation (and yes, after several ridiculous Windows Troubleshooter explanations, and a transfer to a "more knowledgeable" tech), I got a cut-and-paste note saying there are service outtages in certain areas. I pointed out that that did not explain the problem since I was, in fact, chatting to them over the Internet using my Earthlink connection (and there was no reported outtage in my city). ...Maybe, I thought, they'd locked me out because I downloaded too much... Fifteen minutes of explaining later, I got exactly the same note about service outtages pasted into the chat. I politely told them thanks for nothing and exited. I wound up trying crazy things like MAC address spoofing via SMAC, which, I note, didn't work.

      But the connection worked again the following morning. I noted the next day that my slightly late ISP check payment cleared around 6 pm the night the service went down. [Cr/H]ackers may be interested to note, then, the discrepancy here--the computer I almost always connect through was locked out, apparently, but the other one worked fine...! I still have no real idea what the problem was, only theories. It may have been totally unrelated to the bill. And it may be that you can buy a cable modem, fool around wiht some settings, plug into the wall plug in your apartment, and surf away...

      But my point, in fact, is that the so-called Tech Support proved to be much more frustrating than the problem. I quite like Earthlink as an ISP (excellent newsgroups). But if I had never tried reaching them, and had just sat reading a book, I would have been a lot happier.

      Moral of the story: they should tell tech support people to simply say "go to bed".

    3. Re:Never had bad tech support calls... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      I don't know.

      I had a bad hinge on my notebook that caused my video to kick out when I had the thing open at the wrong angle.

      He wondered if I should reinstall Windows.

      I wanted to cry. I had worked at a company like the story had mentioned(Only somewhat more saner) and I had never even heard of things that happen in stereotypical tech support calls happen.

      Until then. It made me want to cry.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  19. Violation of copyright laws by sphealey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And your justification for gross violation of copyright laws is what exactly? Salon.com is a paid-subscription site with limited public access. Its content is NOT under a Creative Commons or GPL license. You have no right to copy an article in bulk from Salon to another site.

    sPh

    1. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Score: -1, Needs to get laid)

    2. Re:Violation of copyright laws by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, I don't think that the story submitter had the right to get the link to the story accepted. Dammit, Slashdot editors *normally* don't allow links to stories that require jumping through hoops to read, but they grandfather news sources in. At one point, the NYT didn't require registration, so they got in. At one point, Salon wasn't a pain in the ass to read, and so it got in.

      I'd like to see Salon and the NYT removed from the "special pass" list.

    3. Re:Violation of copyright laws by TheSunborn · · Score: 0, Troll

      That the site is slashdotted.

    4. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why are you complaining specifically about Salon, when every other article linked to on slashdot gets the same thing done to it? The NYT requires free registration, nut no one seems to mind it when text is copied (except maybe the lawyers).

      Now, Salon needs the money and they do get some for each advertisement shown. On the other hand the site does seem kind of slow at the moment though, so even Salon gets slowed down by slashdotting. Anyway, I read the article yesterday, so I already watched my ad (sorry Salon, I'm a cheap, poor, bastard).

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:Violation of copyright laws by bigkahunafish · · Score: 2, Funny

      well, better get talking to RIAA, or SCO, maybe they will be on your side....

      --
      Eat a Chicken, You know you want to.
    6. Re:Violation of copyright laws by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Seriously, if by now you don't yet know how the Internet works...
      I can't understand that people are so against those ten-second adds : Seriously : Afterwards, you can read the article, free of costs : And it only 'costed' you ten seconds (the ten seconds i most of the times use to empty my trashcan, close all remainder tabs, or whatever comes close to not having to stare at a commercial message for the whole ten seconds.

      Seriously, if you're so against 'jumping through these hoops' : We have not told you to actually click every link that gets posted on here.
      Same goes, for the NY Times : THey have great articles at times, and registering with my register/spam-email account is totally worth it.

    7. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And your justification for gross violation of copyright laws is what exactly?

      You must live in the Corporate States of America or one of its Partners. Maybe you aren't bombing enough violators lately?

    8. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hoop-jumping or not, it was an interesting story and I'd hate to have missed it.

      I think most of us are up to enduring an ad or two for something of this quality. If not, the story warned you and you're not forced to follow the link.

    9. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You have no right to copy an article in bulk from Salon to another site.

      Then what gives you the right to read what he copied? Terrorist!!!

    10. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a noble stand, but one made in vain. Already the parrent has been modded up. Salon.com is a paid-subscription site with limited public access, though even the RIAA would tell you in a perfect world copyright would allow such use. But it's not a perfect world, it's Slashdot, and instead of being modded down, the AC is modded up.

    11. Re:Violation of copyright laws by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      someone modded this up? sigh.

      i hope salon is happy, because even with the obvoius copyright infridgement, they just made a lot of money today. People see how good the articles are, and they pay for it. Before you go whining about copyrights, how bout you ask salon.com how many new accounts they had yesterday, and how many they had in the last hour.

      --
      Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    12. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I tried to read the article but was unable to access it via salon's site.. thanks anonymous coward for posting the article :D

    13. Re:Violation of copyright laws by kfg · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, the law, in its wisdom, has recognized the likelyhood of such, anticipated the act, and provided a rememdy.

      KFG

    14. Re:Violation of copyright laws by rueger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Salon site would not load the story after I had watched the ad. If their system does not function reliably I feel less compulsion to worry about this re-posting.

      I watched ad, I done my time, now I want to read the article.

      Or maybe I should have called Salon tech support????

    15. Re:Violation of copyright laws by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      The same for me. I watched the ad, with sound and all, to get a "Free Day Pass", which supposedly means you can read articles for a day, but when I clicked the link to read the article, it was the same small piece of the article all over again.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    16. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Enteebee · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Quit whining and go get a damn screwdriver. I don't have time for this bullshit."

    17. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Spyffe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And your justification for gross violation of copyright laws is what exactly?
      And Salon's restriction of the flow of information is a God-given right? Get off your high horse.

      Information can't be bought or sold. They still have it if you get it, so they don't lose anything except the ability to restrict what you think and say.

      Copyright is the biggest scam since organized religion.

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
    18. Re:Violation of copyright laws by sqlgeek · · Score: 1
      Yes, and then you'd have eliminated a disturbing proportion of quality reporting that is available on the internet. If a disproportionate number of news stories link back to the ny times or salon, then my friend, that is because they are just that good. The articles are always labeled, and you can simply skip the posts that originate in one of these sites.


      Simple, no?


      Scott

    19. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      I had to turn off pop-up blocking to get it to go on to the article. Stuck here at work using IE with the google toolbar.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    20. Re:Violation of copyright laws by cellocgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't understand that people are so against those ten-second adds : Seriously : Afterwards, you can read the article, free of costs
      Except that I have blocked a pile of cookies from sites like "adclick.net," "clickseeker.net" etc. One of these random cookies is the one Salon uses to track their visitors. Damned if I'm going to sort thru my cookieblock file to figure out which one it is.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    21. Re:Violation of copyright laws by cybergrue · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see Salon and the NYT removed from the "special pass" list.
      Thre is a partner code for NYT that bypasses the registration, however the submission system does not seem to be able to automatically convert the NYT urs to this format. If anyone knows how to do this, please post how to do it here. I know it involves something more complicated then applying &PARTNER=SLASHDOT to the end of the URL.

    22. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't understand that people are so against those ten-second adds

      Why the fuck am I paying for high-speed access if the idiots running the websites are gonna INTENTIONALLY slow them down?

      I say fuck 'em: You wanna mess around with delays and forced viewing ads and other crap like that, deal with the fact that we are gonna find ways around it.
      Even if that way is to shun your ad-ridden sites.

      I used to check IGN everyday, then they sold their soul to the advertising and registration branch of hell, now I close down the window as soon as I realise that I've inadvertantly followed a link to their pages. It beats having to cope with whatever horrible advertising scheme they are about to spew at me. Will it be flash animations over the text? Forced full page ad views? Or the mother of all insults: Ads with FUCKING LOUD NOISES suddenly blasting out of my speakers? Don't know, don't wanna know.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    23. Re:Violation of copyright laws by sphealey · · Score: 1
      And Salon's restriction of the flow of information is a God-given right? Get off your high horse.

      Information can't be bought or sold. They still have it if you get it, so they don't lose anything except the ability to restrict what you think and say.

      And you are free to make that argument to your elected representative. I may or may not support you in that: we are currently in an era of "too much control" over copyrights, but IMHO there does need to be some (socially-constructed) set of restrictions/permissions to allow creative people to benefit from their work, while not stifling creativity.

      However, at the moment that is not where the law stands. And I don't see this as being a "Martin Luther King" issue either, so references to civil disobedience will have to be very well thought-out.

      sPh

    24. Re:Violation of copyright laws by WOSSquee · · Score: 1

      http://premium.salon.com/daypass/index.jsp

    25. Re:Violation of copyright laws by aborchers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Answer me this:

      Where would that information you're whining about Salon "restricting" be if Salon hadn't been there to develop and publish it?

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    26. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Blue+Stone · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      The ad wouldn't load for me at all. Don't know why.
      I was grateful someone posted the story here.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    27. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      You're new here, aren't you?

      *grin* (couldn't resist)

      You're right, of course. They should have posted a link to google's cache and let THEM do the copyright infringing.

    28. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I just read this over lunch, thought it was funny and decided to share it with my colleague. It would not let him read it (although it DID let him view the adverisement; imagine that!). Probably has to do with their method of authenticating who has viewed the ad; we both hide behind the same firewall with NAT.

      salon.com is incompetent; fuck 'em!

    29. Re:Violation of copyright laws by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Same goes, for the NY Times : THey have great articles at times, and registering with my register/spam-email account is totally worth it.

      Right. And if your privacy concerns are so acute that you can't register for a website, you shouldn't be using the world wide web to get your news in the first place. Their weblogs are probably far more useful in tracking you than some stupid username.

      In fact, when I worked for an online newspaper provider, I would generally have mine the logs when we needed more information on a user. Example: somebody posted a death threat to a reporter using our forums. His username pointed to a yahoo account, no use there. Luckily, I was able to trace his account's last login back to one of our reverse cache servers, and get his IP address from the logs. His local PD used this info to contact his ISP, and they tracked him down pretty good.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    30. Re:Violation of copyright laws by holizz · · Score: 1

      If they didn't want it copying they should have put better DRM on their website...

    31. Re:Violation of copyright laws by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      It's a good time to go for coffee, or to hit the head if you've already had your coffee.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    32. Re:Violation of copyright laws by realdpk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh, well, considering that salon is DOWN right now, what's the problem here? I just watched their silly GE ad, and then I click to go on to the article and their site is refusing connections. Salon just got a dime for free from me! :)

    33. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Spyffe · · Score: 1
      Maybe some volunteer would have interviewed the protagonist of the story and posted the interview on Slashdot or some other free site.

      Perhaps no-one would have.

      Simply putting in effort to do something, no matter how cool or difficult it is, doesn't give you the right to prevent others from doing it again, no matter how easy it may be afterward.

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
    34. Re:Violation of copyright laws by skooba · · Score: 2

      i am cookie-paranoid, so i won't let salon.com set a cookie. it therefore will not let me read the article via the force-ad. see! i am not paranoid; the cookies really are out to get me!

    35. Re:Violation of copyright laws by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's that good? Take any NYT article with a grain of salt. Who knows what other priorities exist in their newsroom? NYT editors consider some things to be more important than getting the story right, such as promoting minorities. Sorry, but it's true.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    36. Re:Violation of copyright laws by aborchers · · Score: 1
      Simply putting in effort to do something, no matter how cool or difficult it is, doesn't give you the right to prevent others from doing it again, no matter how easy it may be afterward.


      AC didn't put in the effort to do anything again, and wouldn't have infringed copyright if he had. Restricting, as in censoring, the free flow of information and copying and pasting someone else's commercial work are two very different things.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    37. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Wokan · · Score: 1

      I'm glad he copied it. I tried going through their free pass commercial and it consistently refused to continue on through to the article.

      I really must remember not to visit Salon.com ever again.

    38. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Yakko · · Score: 1
      The ad wasn't even 10 seconds. Simply clicking to view the flash content (supposing you use Flash click-to-view), then clicking "enter Salon Premium" got me in. It's the click-through that matters to them.

      I have my own NYT login, and have never received spam because of them.

      If you make your browser's cookies only last the session, then you should be opted out of all that tracking trash, too. Sure, it's a jump through a few hoops, but it works for me. I remain untracked, they get their ad revenue and demographic info.

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    39. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And you are free to make that argument to your elected representative.

      Fundamental problem for the "little guy": the way to the ears of the elected representatives usually leads through their pockets.

    40. Re:Violation of copyright laws by IchBinDasWalross · · Score: 0

      When they say you need a free day pass, someone will undoubtedly have posted it in the comments. That's what I check first. NYT is no problem for me, but Salon is annoying. RTFC.

      --
      Mod "Overrated" instead of replying "I disagree with you," you coward.
    41. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's content.ultramercial or ultramercial.com.

    42. Re:Violation of copyright laws by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Please, they get my undivided, but non-caring attention for 30+ seconds, yet the still plaster ads inline throughout the entire fucking post. So one ad is somehow more valuable than the HUNDREDS they could otherwise subject me to as a non-paying member? They drove numbers of people away with this crap. As a once prolific salon.com reader, I now refuse to read them unless my slashbox shows an article that might interest me. They burnt a customer that could have meant lots of ad-impressions.

      It's a PITA. It's nagware to get people to pay to view the site (and is the site truly ad-free afterwards? as a nonpaying user I have no idea).

    43. Re:Violation of copyright laws by hesiod · · Score: 2, Informative

      > most of us are up to enduring an ad or two for something of this quality. If not, the story warned you

      Yeah, except they get paid for showing the ad, and some of us can't actually see the rest of the article. After going to their "sponsor ad," the link is broken.

    44. Re:Violation of copyright laws by kableh · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are no ads if you subscribe. I understand your gripes (I only allow through cookies explicitly), but this article is worth a read.

      Drifting OT, Salon usually runs deals where if you subscribe you get a free magazine subscription or two also. I got a year of Wired free, for example, and 6 months of Mother Jones free when I signed up a friend. Good stuff!

    45. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Talinom · · Score: 1

      [Begin SCO Logic]
      So shouldn't Salon sue each and every Slashdot user for having illegal access to their IP? Should it determine which users read it and only sue them? Perhaps it should sue Slashdot directly for not removing the offending IP (fortunately we KNOW where and what it is)? Should Slashdot start an indemnification program for users who did RTFA? Should all users say they didn't RTFA even if they did?
      [End SCO Logic]

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    46. Re:Violation of copyright laws by ScottKin · · Score: 0, Informative

      How do you expect actual companies like IGN to make money to pay for servers, T3's and OC12's, support staff, web designers, network admins, advertizing people, game reviewers and everyone else who runs a business?

      ADVERTIZING

      Most sites like IGN and GameSpy allow you to purchase something called a "subscription" (as in "buying a subscription to Slashdot) that will allow you to bypass those annoying Adverts. If you don't want to pay for access to such sites and don't want to deal with Ads, then the answer is very simple: Don't go there, or find another outlet for the news & info that site provides that doesn't use irritating Ads & pop-ups/pop-unders.

      Welcome to the New Internet - it's been here since the 1990's. Get used to it or go to some geek-boy's homebrew gaming website that carries nearly the same info you'll find in IGN, but with cute little animated GIFs of Pikachu all over the place.

      Your Choice.

      --ScottKin

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
    47. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Let's put it this way.

      Is Ken Lay in jail for stealing tens of billions of dollars? Doesn't seem so. How about Rush Limbaugh, who sent his maid out to buy drugs by the thousands? Not a chance.

      However, Slashdot pulls a post about Scientology's OT3 "Xenu is an alien" theology, even though they broke no laws.

      Ah, I read today that John Ashcroft (Attorney General, anointed by Judge Clarence Thomas) is going to keep prosecuting Scott Ritter, chief American weapons inspector for Iraq, for something involving that faked kiddie porn charge that was leveled against the ex-Marine after he told everyone that Bush was lying about WMD's. Pure vengeance, pure evil, pure abuse of law to punish those who speak truth to corrupt power.

      Here I see that RIAA has hired thugs to wear black windbreakers with the letters "RIAA" emblazoned across the back. They are raiding flea markets and "busting" people. The first recorded use of corporate private law enforcement on the streets.

      With all this, who cares about breaking the law about "intellectual property". It's an article, it's on the Internet, it's free. That's how the Internet works. That is how file transfer technology works. Deal.

      Stupid laws, and rich bastards who can break any law they like with impunity weaken respect for the law. Enron didn't care. Thousands of CEOs who are looting the nation don't care. Why should we?

      The only ethics anyone with cash cares about is: if I can get away with it, screw legal. Obedience is for suckers without lawyers.

      Why should we care either?

    48. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Vess+V. · · Score: 1

      -1? Huh?

    49. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Salon's restriction of the flow of information is a God-given right?

      No, it's a right given by society, to promote growth of the public domain. They have a legitimate expectation of being able to control the scarcity of their original works. They, quite reasonably, based their business model around it.

      When arseholes copy it about with no regard for copyright, it undermines their ability to control the scarcity, and therefore their ability to profit from it. Without profit, they can't pay the writers. Without the writers, we don't get the articles.

      Sure, they could have chosen a different business model. But they didn't. Sure, other organizations are abusing copyright by extending it to stupid lengths of time and putting onerous restrictions on fair use. They are not.

      Information can't be bought or sold.

      What a stupid statement, of course it can. Ever dial directory enquiries to find out somebody's phone number? Your ideology is blinding you to basic facts.

      They still have it if you get it, so they don't lose anything except the ability to restrict what you think and say.

      What a crock of shit. They have lost the ability to control the scarcity of the resource. They aren't trying to control what we think and say. They are using the rights given to them by society to make a living.

      If you disagree, convince society to give up copyright. That will let the people who have legitimately based their livelihoods around it make the transition without putting them out of a job in the process.

    50. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Bush+Pig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Here I see that RIAA has hired thugs to wear black windbreakers with the letters "RIAA" emblazoned across the back. They are raiding flea markets and "busting" people. The first recorded use of corporate private law enforcement on the streets.

      It's not, actually. Early last century, many US companies used Pinkerton's agents armed with pick handles as strike-breakers.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    51. Re:Violation of copyright laws by spun · · Score: 1

      Thanks, Bush Pig, for mentioning that. I was going to post that in response, but thought I would check what you had posted on the off chance we had the same thought. Funny, what with all the well thought out ideas in the grandparent post, we would focus on a little detail like that. Oh wait! Pinkerton's KILLED PEOPLE. Guess it's not a little detail. Even with RIAA hiring private goons, we haven't fallen back to those bad old days, yet. But let's not forget, lest we do.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    52. Re:Violation of copyright laws by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

      It's not about the privacy : Hell, the only guaranteed privacy I can get with the computer is by not being connected to the Net.
      I was more aiming at the various sellouts of email databases, and maybe, by giving my 'normal' email address to such sites, it will be filled with Penis Enlargement offers in no-time ;)

    53. Re:Violation of copyright laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very insightful, smudgepot. Too bad you can't spell 'advertising.' And capitalize it in all the wrong places. And are generally a complete cockmonger.

      Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
      Aw, Yip yip yip yip yip yip yip yip
      Mum mum mum mum mum mum
      Get a job
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na
      Every morning about this time
      she get me out of my bed
      a-crying get a job.
      After breakfast, everyday,
      she throws the want ads right my way
      And never fails to say,
      Get a job
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
      Yip yip yip yip yip yip yip yip
      Mum mum mum mum mum mum
      Get a job
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na
      And when I get the paper
      I read it through and through
      And my girl never fails to say
      If there is any work for me,
      And when I go back to the house
      I hear the woman's mouth
      Preaching and a crying,
      Tell me that I'm lying 'bout a job
      That I never could find.
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
      Yip yip yip yip yip yip yip yip
      Mum mum mum mum mum mum
      Get a job
      Sha na na na, sha na na na na

  20. This call may be monitored... by lutefish · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For the time being, I'm the guy doing the monitoring. Recorded calls, live calls, I shudder to think how many I've listened to in the past months. And we do indeed listen to them (whilst existing in that impossible state of forced-web-browsing-boredom) with at least one ear. Occasionally I get callers fired, largely for fun, but sometimes because they're rubbish. Of course, this is telemarketing, not tech support, and the government (UK) have reasonably strict laws on what will and won't hack it. Same third-party, outsourced set up. Perhaps some sort of regulatory/accountability / government-in-your-backyard intervention is required?

    --
    Amor omnia vincit. Occasionally.
    1. Re:This call may be monitored... by NarcolepticPenguin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Holy crap. You get _callers_ fired? Heres hoping I never get routed to your call center...

    2. Re:This call may be monitored... by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      He did say it was telemarketing, so yes he could get callers fired.

      I was once the system admin for the call-recording servers at a financial services company. I know the pain that the call center employees went through. Luckily, they weren't outsourced, so more than just the call time mattered. Compliance/adherence and quality mattered a great deal.

      Mind you, that company was more like Initech than any other company I've worked for, and I'm glad to be out of there.

    3. Re:This call may be monitored... by Evil-G · · Score: 1

      In telemarketing, the caller is the employee, so firing the caller would make more sense than firing the called party.

  21. Tech support via phone is irrelevant anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in their right mind would call someone on the phone in an attempt to get the computer working??

    Try to tell someone how to tie their shoelaces over the phone. It will never work!

    "We don't support that", they say, and why the hell do people pay for such a "support"?

  22. obligatory dead troll link by enrico_suave · · Score: 5, Funny

    Internet Help Desk skit (it's in quicktime)

    It's mildly amusing, but there is grains of truth in the humor...

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    1. Re:obligatory dead troll link by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      That was hilarious... I was laughing my head off. The sad thing about it, though, is it's mostly true.

    2. Re:obligatory dead troll link by swankypimp · · Score: 1

      Funny stuff. As a tech line monkey, I've always liked Ernie Cline's Tech Support monologue. "The Internet is my bitch... I speak its language: I'm like f**king Tron."

      --

      --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
  23. Very, very familiar. by Murmer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I used to work at a Prominent Canadian ISP, and this sounds very familiar.

    If you're a big fan of "root causes", well, the root cause of crappy tech support is the business model. The people who work there get paid per hour, but the actual company, or in this case "branch-of-other-company-via-internal-billing" gets paid per call that comes into the building. Therefore somebody who is needs three or four calls to fix a problem, rather than just one, is three or four more times as profitable to the company as one who calls once.

    In this environment, the ideal setup is about 95% braindead scriptreaders who can cheaply solve the great majority of problems given a flowchart and three or four tries and a tiny handful of people who handle the real problems from the persistent clients. But if you're actually good, and you want to keep your job, you have to play by Management's playbook.

    There's an optimal point somewhere where the cheapness of tech-support expenses is balanced against the cost of losing clients, and I promise you, some very smart people have worked out those numbers.

    Seriously, that's why consumer net access is so cheap, in both senses of the word, these days.

    --
    Mike Hoye
    1. Re:Very, very familiar. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I could happily live with no tech support -- there are a few ISPs that do this. You can cancel or order an account, and that's all they purport to do. They give you a slip of paper with the information you need, and if you have trouble configuring your email client, well, that's your problem. Of course, it means that you don't have to pay for the tech support that you never use anyway.

    2. Re:Very, very familiar. by ISPTech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The funny part of this one for me is when you have a V.P of your company that has your product and needs help and you don't have anyone with a Clue to help them. Watch your manager squirm then.

      If anyone is in this position, suggest to your upper management to call the support line and try to get help with something.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Very, very familiar. by cybergrue · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a friend who worked at annother major Canadian ISP (in house). Anyway, he left shortly after management had the idea that tech support should be a 'cost recovery centre.' No I am not making this up, the tech support workers were asked to hawk other things after the call was resolved and before they hung up. At first, it was upgrades to service (dial up to DSL) This was sort of a joke as basically the only people who hadn't upgraded already could not as DSL was not avaliable in their area. Later the ISP started selling other equipment, like software and hardware (hubs, routers, etc.). This was a further joke as the ISP did not support the items they were selling.

    4. Re:Very, very familiar. by CrashPoint · · Score: 1
      Sprint PCS started doing this about six months ago. Everyone you talk to, whether they're in billing or one of the various tech-support queues, is required to pitch long-distance service and additional crap that doesn't work.


      They emphasize that more than they do the actual fixing of problems, and it's already taking its toll in both customer relations and the ability of the average tech (as good techs get pissed off and leave, and the newbies get drilled on salesmanship instead of problem-solving).


      Fortunately I managed to weasel out of that requirement by getting over to another department where the upselling bullshit isn't required.

    5. Re:Very, very familiar. by TALlama · · Score: 1

      Alright, so why don't the computer makers (the people employing these call centers) write a little bit more into their contracts:
      <legalese>Whenever a tech hangs up on a customer, the customer is asked to say if (1) their problem was not solved (2) the tech gave them some 'do this and call back' advice (new part, new sw, etc) or (3) the problem is solved.</legalese>
      The call center gets paid based on how many problems get solved, and they get nothing for the other two.
      This seems so simple that there has to be some reason it's not happening.

      --

      - The Amazina Llama

    6. Re:Very, very familiar. by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

      I'll buy this if all impediments to me switching providers in a day are removed. For dial-up Internet, I'll take a no tech support service so long as it's providing nothing but access (no email, Web hosting or suchlike) and I pay by the day or by the minute. That way, if your service breaks I can just try another provider and forget about you.

  24. "Who will be left to buy anything?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody. Capitalism has failed.

    Now, we could go back to market economy, but do you think it will ever happen?

  25. Mozilla Ad-blocking by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Allow cookies from cache.ultramercial.com

    Adblock cache.ultramercial.com/*
    Adblock salon.com/Creatives/*

    That flags the cookie you've seen the ad, and next time you get a nice clean page that says click here to continue.

    Also on Salon, the ads are pathed to /Creatives. Your not missing out on ads people - your missing out on creativity. This site bugs me, I thought cool the finally have text ads - but they turned out to be GIF's!

    1. Re:Mozilla Ad-blocking by julesh · · Score: 1

      Creative is a common word in the "ad biz" that refers to a design for an advert.

  26. Not all that enlightening by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought it was fairly well known that call centers are all a numbers game. Management wants minimum call duration and maximum calls per employee; they're not really interested in solved problems.

    The more calls you can handle, the fewer people you need (and all the associated overhead costs) and the more profit you make. It's really that simple.

    Employees who actually take the time to help people get bad numbers and ultimately get canned, even if they're good at helping people. The successful employees figure out how to crank through their calls ASAP, as well as how to game the system so that they can sneak idle time without appearing to ignore calls in queue.

    It's essentially the rules associated with factory work applied to answering the phone.

    1. Re:Not all that enlightening by MCZapf · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to the article, it's even worse than that. The people with ultra-short call time averages - those who basically just hang up on people - are promoted. Repeatedly.

    2. Re:Not all that enlightening by eggoeater · · Score: 1

      That may be the case for Tech call centers or out-sourced call centers but not ALL call centers. I work in a very large call center in a major financial corporation. We have top notch customer service. Yes, they look at average call time but not at the individual level. They grade the reps by how much time they spend on the phone, not the number of calls or the average length of those calls.

      My job as a programmer is to use technology to bring the AHT (average handling time) down as much as possible any way we can.

      Right now I'm working on a project that would lower the AHT for 5% of the calls by 3-5 seconds. That may seem miniscule but at our call volume, that could save half a million dollars a year. Unfortunatly I don't get a cut but I'm also not going to get laid-off anytime soon.
      ----
      Thank you for holding, My sig will be with you in a moment...

    3. Re:Not all that enlightening by Mateito · · Score: 0

      I worked at Sun back in the "good old days" (ok.. not so long ago.. around 1997) when the call center were actually people with a clue. Sure, we had a database of problems (sunsolve internal) which solved around half the problems. The rest went to various front-end engineers.. some who new Veritas Volume Manger, some who knew solstice backup. Stuff we couldn't get our heads around went up to second level. It was a good training ground. Plenty of people who started there are now doing second or third level support, or even pre-sales stuff. We had a manager who had just done a "call center management" course, and either decided through incompetance or management degree to turn our front end engineers into call centre employees. More than half the good people left in the first month. (I was gone maybe two months later to another position within the company). Last I heard was that the call center had become a bunch of call-logging script readers. I don't know what happened to the team leader... hopefully they made her a manager somewhere, but given that she was acutally very very good at her job and often stood up for her people, I somehow doubt it.

    4. Re:Not all that enlightening by Jardine · · Score: 1

      I thought it was fairly well known that call centers are all a numbers game. Management wants minimum call duration and maximum calls per employee; they're not really interested in solved problems.

      Not all call centres are like that. Almost all of the contracts the call centre I work in has are by the minute rather than by the call. The problem in this situation is that they're all little shitty contracts with not enough calls to staff even 1 person per contract. So you end up with agents working 8-12 projects at once. At the moment I'm support for 11 different companies. The total number of companies I've supported over the past couple years is over 30.

      Call times don't really matter unless there are calls waiting (we can only drop a certain percentage of calls). The company makes more money the more minutes we're on the phone.

  27. Re:Oversea tech support by jalbro · · Score: 4, Informative


    "The reason they got so much hell from corporate customers is that they have dedicated IT professionals who've already done all the testing and can't afford two hours on the phone to get some replacement hardware sent out. The IT dept will simply switch to a new vendor if that kind of crap persists."

    Actually, larger firms can get a deal with Dell where an in-house tech can order parts under warranty on a website. I would go nuts if my company didn't have that option.

    -Jeff

  28. Nothing new...... by jsimon12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is this even a story? This is nothing new, first level tech support has ALWAYS been like this. When I was fresh outta school in the early 90's and worked tech support this was the status quo, and low and behold it still is the status quo 15 years later.

    1. Re:Nothing new...... by lambent · · Score: 1

      This is news for the reason that people find it interesting.

      Why is your comment insightful? If things have always been this way (for 15 years), then obviously everyone knows this. You should obviously have been modded as -1 Redundant.

      Why did you bother even reading and commenting if it doesn't interest you?

    2. Re:Nothing new...... by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      It's news because not everyone has worked that kind of job. Most of the people here on /. also know enough about their computers to never have to call that sort of line.

      It's important to be reminded that normal users out there have a hard time with their computers. The user interfaces that they're given aren't necessarily the best or easiest to use, there's a lot of things that salespeople sell them that they don't need and add to the complexity of their machines, and all they want to do is read their email.

  29. Re:Sounds like someone has a case of the Mondays. by mrscorpio · · Score: 0

    I beg to differ, pal.

    Go watch your DVD again.

    Chris

  30. Quote by savagedome · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A friend of mine who works for tech support summarized it very nicely. According to him 'Working in tech support is like living an unreality that when a client opens up an issue with the support, they imagine that a group of people in a room is working devotedly to their specific problem. And I live this for every single client'.

  31. I worked as a telemarketer... by PhilippeT · · Score: 0

    and quit about 1 week in.

    They didnt want me to go since i was the highest seller. They actualy begged me to stay.

    I could not stand calling up people and asking if they wanted life insurance on their sears card... i it so many freeking widows/widowers made me mad that they had such an old crappy setup.

    --
    A psychopath can't tell the difference between right and wrong. A sociopath knows the difference - he just doesn't care.
  32. Re:this will fix it by ubiquitin · · Score: 1

    Just don't forget the cover sheet on your TPS report.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
  33. I call bullshit by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If this anecdotal tale is actually true, and the whole idea is to make the call length as short as possible, and their are no reprocussions to providing bad support - why not just hang up on the caller after one second? Why even bother talking to the user at all? Sounds like someone just wants us to view a 5 second ad, because the article is "worth it".

    1. Re:I call bullshit by zero+time+ghost · · Score: 1

      It's not that simple. You have to strike a balance between keeping your client happy (the company who outsourced their tech support to you) and keeping the call length down. The QA department listens to random phone calls for this reason.

      I was lousy at this, because I like to solve problems. But I saw plenty of guys get promoted for playing the numbers game.

    2. Re:I call bullshit by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree with you. You DO need to strike a balance. This sensational fictional article doesn't mention this at all. This is my point. I don't know why I would get marked as a 'troll' for pointing this out.

    3. Re:I call bullshit by mnemoth_54 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, your wrong. I've worked in a few of these places, and for the outsourced operations this is always how it is. In-house is a completely different story, your employer wants you to fix it. Outsourcing, you're there to take calls.

      The problem is, as mentioed earlier, their busisness model. No one seems to have developed a resonable and equitable way to pay outsourcers, because the per call method simply does not work.

      Usually the drive to run businesses this way comes from execs with profit sharing, they get their money and leave before the client is completely pissed, and their resumes look like waves of profitability!

      I worked at a company w/ an oustource division, that hired an exec that had just finished pulling this stunt on another company. When i got their, our segment was unprofitable (as support should be), in 3 months we had our first $1 million month, followed by a 2$mil and then $4mil. Folowed by a pissed client, and exec jumping ship, and the downward spiral to loosing the client and the profits.

      The exec? He moved on to his next job and showed off the exponential profit growth that this company had under his fine direction!

    4. Re:I call bullshit by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Well then please answer my question: why not just hang up on the caller immediately? Your average call time will be 1 second, and apparently (accouding to the article) there are no repercussions to doing this.

      Could it be that the article *gasp* SENSATIONALIZED this in order to get page views???

    5. Re:I call bullshit by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      why not just hang up on the caller after one second?

      Too obvious...

      Either the supervisor of the call center or perhaps even the client paying for the call center would eventually catch on. (e.g. the client starts hearing about complaints and does some spot checking.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    6. Re:I call bullshit by egburr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The customer has to hang up first. You can't hang up until the customer does. It's monitored.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    7. Re:I call bullshit by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. You mean that customer satisfaction plays some role as well? Funny how the "article" didn't mention this at all.

      I agree with the premise of keeping call lengths down. Otherwise the users will try to get the tech to answer every possible tech question they may have while they are on the line.

    8. Re:I call bullshit by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I don't know why this would be. According to this article the ENTIRE GOAL is to get the customer off the phone. Customer service has no place, according to this.

    9. Re:I call bullshit by mnemoth_54 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because you have to run the scam for at least a few months to make profits. Call logs are the metrics the whole contract hinges on. There are customer satisfation surveys, done by the client at random, if every call just automaticly hung up even after 20 minutes, the client would know whats up very quickly.

      compare it to the cheating that goes on with the seti client. They can only realisticly detect cheats that do the work in a ridiculusly shot period of time. The rest, that claims reasonable time for the work done. Beyond that your left with random sampling and statistics.

      If you did no work, they know what's up instantly, if you do half assed work they have to get about 3-6 months worth of poor satisfation surveys before you have a trustworthy statistical analysis. Even then they'll usually give the client a chance to improve, so as not to incur the expense of switching to another provider.

      Bottom line, statistical analysis of quality lags far behind that of quantity. The client doesn't know they're getting fleeced for at least a few months, as long as you'r doing something.

    10. Re:I call bullshit by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

      I work with a girl who used to work as a (*gasp*) telemarketer. She told me that her calls were monitored and she would have been immediately fired if she hung up before the person on the other end:

      (a) said the word "No" *three* times
      or
      (b) hung up first.

      I imagine these "techs" have similar rules.

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
    11. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because all calls must be logged. You don't get credit for the call if you don't record the callers information in the magic database.

    12. Re:I call bullshit by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. So customer satisfaction plays some role here. I didn't see that mentioned in the "article".

    13. Re:I call bullshit by Beaker74 · · Score: 1

      It's not that hard. When I worked for a *major* DSL provider, well, I mean I worked for a company that had a contract to do tech support for a *major* DSL provider. It would be insanely easy to trick a customer into hanging up.. Just have them pull the DSL filter out of the wall with the phone they were using connected to it.

      Not that I did that, but I know techs that would use that ploy to get a customer off the line.

      Average Handle Times were about 19 minutes I believe.

    14. Re:I call bullshit by mnemoth_54 · · Score: 1

      Yes it does play some role, not as big as it should, but a very small role.

      If you really think this article is so sensationalized, go sit through two weeks of paid training on your next vacation. Looking at it from the inside, you won't think the article overly sensational anymore.

      And yes I realise that two weeks of vacation is all most people get a year, and working at one of these places is hardly a vacation, but my point is from the inside it is obvious quality is of little to no concern to management.

    15. Re:I call bullshit by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1

      You don't do it ALL the time! Just hit the release button twice when you disconnect that last call. It's imperceivable to someone monitoring and appears to be an anamoly if they track Total Talk Time for each call.

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
  34. burn out problems by millahtime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are burn out and high turn over rates at tech support centers. Recieving those calls all day is draining (I did it). The average time someone does tech support is like 9 months. That is no a whole lot of experience. So, those on the other end usually don't have a lot of experience doing tech support.

    1. Re:burn out problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true. And you wonder why there's such a high turnaround at Decision One(formerly Bell Atlantic - basically a tech support outsourcing company). I worked there TWICE and still have my santiy. thankfully, I'm doing QA now, long away from the customer frustrations.

  35. Seven monitors?!? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 0

    Dude, I want seven monitors.

  36. Or, in other words... by AvantLegion · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...Problem Exists Between Bulb And Ladder.

    1. Re:Or, in other words... by Necrobruiser · · Score: 1, Funny

      LOSE is the opposite of WIN
      LOOSE is the opposite of TIGHT
      It's really not that hard, people...


      Don't be such a looser! :)

      --
      "I planned within my means and got a fixed rate mortgage, so where's MY bailout?" -cafepress
    2. Re:Or, in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He's not, he's being quite a tight-ass about it.. :p

  37. What's the big deal with NYT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Create an account with false info, or Googlize your link to get in. It's really not a big deal.

  38. My days as a tech junkie by otter42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This reminds me of my days as a TSR for a major printing company. I worked for a total of 4 months, and went three of them without any training, except for the obligitory phone training. People there were and still are scared to go to bathroom because the phone will record how many minutes they're away. Some TSR's get breaks by just answering and "accidentally" hitting the hang up button, convieniently located just next to the pick up one.

    Others just told customers the printer was defective and needed to be replaced and sent them a new one. (Now you know why it's so easy to get that printer replaced!)

    And for the printers that really needed to be replaced, that really had major defects, it was a big no-no to even mention that this might be a common problems.

    You see, tech support is all about image. The company doesn't want to give good tech support. It just wants the customers to not think badly about it.

    P.S.: To be fair, the TS was nowhere near as bad as described in the article, but I was only in the (comparitively) highly-trained laser printer dept. The ink-jets were shipped out to India a LONG time ago.

    --
    www.eissq.com/BandP.html Ball and Plate System. Amuse your friends. Crush your enemies.
    1. Re:My days as a tech junkie by Cynikal · · Score: 1

      "P.S.: To be fair, the TS was nowhere near as bad as described in the article"

      well you only worked there for 4 months.. my first 4 months we fine too, in fact i enjoyed my job for at least the first 6 months... once you get closer to a year, or 2, or 4, well i can only repeat what one poster wrote how it will wear a hole in your soul. it drains you, you have draconian rules, support policies, and call stats on one side, and screaming pissed off callers on the other, none of which is your fault, and basically your job is to be dumped on all day, having the life sqeezed out of you from both sides.

      after being laid off, i now only make half of what i did before, strugling to make ends meet, and yet im happier and heathier now than i ever was in that job. things taste better, i have more energy, and i rediscovered my lost ability to smile again. i dont see it as being laid off so much as being paroled early for good behaviour.

    2. Re:My days as a tech junkie by otter42 · · Score: 1

      Well, my section of the TS dept was kinda weird. We did no work. It was foreign language support and I could spend almost all day without answering a single call.

      So my problem wasn't having my soul sucked out, it was having it "bored" out.

      Now the Spanish side, though... Those people jump through the roof when you mention the words "Wrap up."

      GRAMMAR NAZI SOAPBOX: (Sheesh! My grammar, spelling, diction, and style were horrible on the original post. How in the heck did it get rated up??! If I had mod-points, I'd rate myself down just because of stupidity.)

      --
      www.eissq.com/BandP.html Ball and Plate System. Amuse your friends. Crush your enemies.
    3. Re:My days as a tech junkie by Cynikal · · Score: 1

      ah then you had my dream job. i always had email to talk with my gf all day, so i was never bored, even on slow days, not like i saw many slow days.

      i could tell you about the nice 3 month long hell we went through with a constant queue of 60+ ppl waiting, and our employer refused to hire on new techs.

    4. Re:My days as a tech junkie by dbIII · · Score: 4, Funny
      This reminds me of my days as a TSR for a major printing company.
      They terminated you and you stayed resident? Such loyalty would be completely unheard of now.
  39. Support is demanding and expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I worked my way up a call center for an ERP software manufacturer into consulting. Many of my peers did the same thing. We came out of those experiences with great expertise. We ended up knowing more about the software than the developers and more about the hardware than the vendors. That's why we now are all making a comfortable living outside of support.

    I came up through an original support staff of under 6 all the way through a 100+ org with sophisticated call tracking and metrics and high levels of customer satisfaction. Our customers were deploying and implementing production manufacturing systems. They simply could not get up and running without our support. And they were paying 5-figures + just for support, so there was a real incentive and resource base to make quality support happen. Despite that there were times when our customers got less than the best level of support. I'd hate to think what support is like in low margin, high volume businesses.

    For the technically adept, support becomes a physiological challenge. Customers yell and curse at you. Jobs are on the line. Halted production runs can stop an entire shop floor. Big money is on the line. Even when you know what you are doing, it's hard not to take this personally. It is no longer a technical challenge, but a psychological one. Those that can't cope with this reality burn out, those that can become rich as consultants.

    Even in the best of support orgs, with all the financial resources, support is still the bottom of the totem poll in most companies. Too little respect is afforded the support staff by other departments (but those few in the know, actually find the broad knowledge from the support group). Support is seen as a beginning, not an endgame for their most talented people. The writing is on the wall once you start to become an internal consultant to the sales and development departments. You will be leaving support and taking your knowledge and mentoring skills to greener pastures.

    In my experience, for complicated software I've found that a support group can utilize as many resources as the sales or development group. How many companies do you know that put as much resources into support as into the other groups? In support, like everything else, you get what you pay for. Even when a company realizes the value of support, the best people eventually go elsewhere. Until these issues get resolved, support will remain in its generally shabby shape.

    1. Re:Support is demanding and expensive by michael_cain · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And they were paying 5-figures + just for support, so there was a real incentive and resource base to make quality support happen. Despite that there were times when our customers got less than the best level of support. I'd hate to think what support is like in low margin, high volume businesses.

      Exactly. So it is not surprising that the support service for products that are generally sold by being the least-cost box available is a DISASTER. I bought a Gateway box for $399. With one exception, it has worked just fine. I suspect that if I ever make a call to tech support, Gateway ends up losing money. The one time I had a problem, their Web site actually had useful information that allowed me to recover gracefully -- much better information than I think I would have gotten from the call center.

    2. Re:Support is demanding and expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We ended up knowing more about the software than the developers and more about the hardware than the vendors.

      Keep telling yourself that. Maybe we should replace the developers with you and see how much you really know.

  40. What the REAL measure should be by Rathian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is really screwed up. Since when does abusing your customers become good practice?

    Perhaps I am nieve or just old fashioned but whatever happened to CUSTOMER SATISFACTION. Support like this is an abuse of customers, how much are customers willing to take before they simply go elsewhere?

    If I receive bad support from a company when I need it - I will remember that incident when it comes time to make my next purchase. If I receive good support, then I am not only going to likely be a repeat buyer, but I am also likely to recommend that company's product to others.

    1. Re:What the REAL measure should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the market is what happened to 'customer satisfaction'. Customers have demonstrated that they are perfectly happy to put up with lousy service if the percieve that they are saving a bit of money. (c.f. bigbox retailers vs. small places with staff that actually know something about what they sell).

      In other words, people are not willing to pay for good service, so they don't get it. Unfortunately, this means that just because you as an individual may be willing to pay for this, you may not have the option if the majority of your peers are not.

      pretty simple, huh?

    2. Re:What the REAL measure should be by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps I am nieve or just old fashioned but whatever happened to CUSTOMER SATISFACTION.

      That died when the stock market and big corporations became the norm and drove the local mom-and-pop stores out of business.

      Companies exist to make money for their stock-holders. By and large, the stock holders really don't give a dirty rat tail as to the how that money is made. Ethics be damned and the last rat on the ship gets stuck holding the worthless stock when it all comes crashing down.

      Oh, and since the mega-stores ran the local mom-and-pop places out of business - where is the "elsewhere" that the consumer is supposed to now turn to?

      Definitely something to ponder as you do your daily shopping. Do I go to Wal*Mart / Lowe's / Home Depot and deal with the faceless corporation, or do I support a local mom-and-pop operation?

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    3. Re:What the REAL measure should be by fltsimbuff · · Score: 1

      You get what you pay for. One metric I have heard where I work is that it costs about $11 per call to the company that is taking tech support calls. With Many thousands of calls per day, and charging low rates for Internet access that barely leaves anything for Tech support, they cannot afford to pay enough to hire people with credentials...

      Most have just Some customer service experience, and are trained for maybe 2 weeks onsite. Part of the reason is the high turnover rate. It is a very stressful job. Having to meet certain times, and quality standards, and speak to people who (sometimes) chew you out because they are angry at the company. People don't usually work there long, so you get new people a lot.

      Anyone there for more than a couple of months is usually good enough to help out. I have been doing it for 2 and 1/2 years now, with a Dialup ISP, then with a DSL ISP. I do all I can to help out, and luckily, my call center at least recognizes Satisfaction and QA stats over call times when necessary.

      Don't knock it 'till you've tried it.

    4. Re:What the REAL measure should be by Kpau · · Score: 1

      Customer satisfaction vanished the instant management schools started teaching that the primary purpose of business is to MAXIMIZE SHAREHOLDER VALUE rather than MAKE A GREAT PRODUCT THAT CUSTOMERS LOVE TO BUY. Customers have lifespans beyond one quarter-year... shareholders don't.

    5. Re:What the REAL measure should be by stwrtpj · · Score: 1
      That died when the stock market and big corporations became the norm and drove the local mom-and-pop stores out of business.

      Hit the nail on the head. This implies that you get better service from smaller companies, and this is absolutely right.

      Case and point: I recently purchased a new PC from a small company called Penguin Computing. Really nice 2.5GHz Intel Xeon system, all SCSI, RH9 preinstalled. Only when I got the system, the Iomega Jaz drive didn't work. I had the problem resolved in only 3 business days. Here's how it went:

      Day 1: call tech support, get a LIVE HUMAN BEING without the need to go through a menu. Do some troubleshooting, decide to try a different disk.

      Day 2: Received new disk via FedEx overnight (yes, you read that right). Tried it out, didn't work, called support again. Again got a real live human being who I did NOT have to explain the whole problem to all over again. More troubleshooting, decides the drive is defective, sends a new one.

      Day 3: New drive received via, again, FedEx overnight. Replace drive, works like a champ. Get an email from customer service later in the day that says here's the RMA for the defective drive and, oh by the way, we'll have FedEx come to your door to pick up the defective drive for return.

      I almost didn't want to tell anyone about this company for fear they'll get so successful that they'll become yet another monolithic supermegacorp and their support will turn lousy. I guess I'll just have to enjoy it while it lasts.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    6. Re:What the REAL measure should be by hudsucker · · Score: 1
      That is exactly what I was wondering.

      Why would any reputable company outsource their support with this type of contract? They have to know that the situation in the article would be the result, and therefore their customer satisfaction is going to go down the tubes. This is almost as dumb a management move as suing your customers.

      You would think they would set up the contract to at least include some sort of customer satisfaction survey SLA (service level agreement).

      Back when we used Token Ring cards, we tried them from two different companies. One company was probably the top name in NICs, but their tech support was abysmal. I vowed never to buy any product from that company ever again.

      The other company was less well known (let's just say that their name started with O and rhymes with telecom), but their tech support was fantastic -- whenever I called, it seemed like I received a call back from an engineer within an hour. OK, maybe that is exaggerating, but I remember that they always were able to solve my problem within a few hours. So you can better believe that I always bought from that company, even though they were more expensive.

      The point is that quality tech support is or should be marketable. People who know will give you business and maybe even pay more just to get good tech support. And bad tech support is only makes business sense if you have no desire for repeat customers.

    7. Re:What the REAL measure should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since...

      http://www.customerssuck.com/

  41. Punter by pilotofficerprune · · Score: 4, Informative

    A gambler. (One who "punts" money on the horses.) A customer of goods or services. These days the term is applied so broadly it can refer to any member of the great British public: anyone who is in the market for goods, services or help. "It's what the punters want," is an excuse for pandering to the lowest common denomenator.

    1. Re:Punter by radish · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Also specifically used to refer to a client of a prostitute.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Punter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this article, the word "punter" is referencing American Football. When a team fails to get the required yardage, the kicker "punts" the ball across the field to the opposing team. It's essentially passing off what you can't, or don't want to deal with.

    3. Re:Punter by Opie812 · · Score: 0

      An interesting definition, but clearly incorrect in the context of the article.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
  42. Re:Sounds like someone has a case of the Mondays. by stratjakt · · Score: 0
    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  43. The Mail-Merge Couch by stuffduff · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back when Microsoft Office was pretty new, Bill Gates was touring the facility and in one of the call centers, he discovered a couch in the center of the room. When he asked about the couch, he was told that it was the Mail-Merge couch; because when anyone needed help with Mail-Merge, they would be on the phone for a long time.

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
    1. Re:The Mail-Merge Couch by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      So true. I just wrote an export script to send some of our product's GIS data to a file for mail merge. I promptly discovered that, between Office 2000 (which I use) and Office XP, Microsoft COMPLETELY changed how mail merge worked, and my solution was no longer the easy way to do it. In fact, during testing every single one of our QA staff managed to do it wrong. And since they're also the ones who take the calls, I gotta fix it.

      Luckily, I was just scratching out this function for a demo and have time to revamp it before release. But it does set me back at least a day while I research the various versions of Office to make sure our solution is backwards compatible. And all I'm doing is making a comma delimited list!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:The Mail-Merge Couch by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Microsoft used to have really good tech support. I've known people in the late '80s to sit on the phone for over an hour with a technican, learning about some intricacy of MSDOS or how Windows starts up.

      They also used to include really good documentation. It fell to pot with Win3.1 and got worse with Win95, but it began to improve again in the late 90's... even if you have to pay extra for it.

    3. Re:The Mail-Merge Couch by stuffduff · · Score: 1
      I remember running into issues with early versions of QuickBasic, and C++ in which I had to prove that there was a problem in the language before I could even get to bust out of the screeners and talk to a techie. But there were some great techies out there, and some of them would actually address the problem in the code while I was on the phone. I'd get a dll in e-mail and test the fix before I even got off the phone.

      Now you have to purchase a support plan before you can even pick up the phone. Fortunately, there's Google Groups.

      --
      "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  44. And you wonder... by Amigori · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...why offshoring has become so popular. Americans don't want these jobs, effectively the janitors of the computer world. And honestly, I'd rather spend my nights improving my spanish with the mexicans cleaning Walmart or [insert large chain retailer] than spending 8 hours under the watchful eye of the telecomm system. At least mopping floors has some physical exercise and your not stuck in cubicle world and less stress too.

    The high turnover rate of employment is cause of concern for me. However, it won't end until people realize that the job is horrible and shouldn't go after it because of the money. $8/hr to flip burgers at McDonalds or $9/hr to get screamed at, both by management and the caller, and have to worry how to get "customers" off the phone as quickly as possible, I'd take burger-flippin' any day. I may come home smelling like french fries, but a quick shower will fix that and that extra dollar just isn't worth it to me.

    Amigori

    --
    "The quality of life is determined by its activites."--Aristotle
    1. Re:And you wonder... by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but I'd like to know what part of the country you live in where McDonald's pays $8/hour. I know shift managers that make $6.75. Minimum wage is $5.75 last I checked (even though the poverty line is like $8.60 or something like that).

      Just curious.

    2. Re:And you wonder... by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      I was in louisville, kentucky about 3-4 years ago, and they were offering 9 an hour.

    3. Re:And you wonder... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      What dumbass called this post a troll? I feel the same way. Would rather mop floors than work tech support.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    4. Re:And you wonder... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      You shoulda got in on the janitorial gravy train years ago. I know someone who has been a janitor at a major aerospace corp for mumblety-mumble years, and she makes $26/hour plus OT and major benefits (such as a substantial co-pay for buying a new car, I shit you not). And the best part is that she can leave work at work. There's no take-home stress. (Plus she looks half her age, probably from all that regular exercise.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:And you wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least mopping floors has some physical exercise and your not stuck in cubicle world and less stress too.

      Plus you dont have to learn stuff like "grammar".

    6. Re:And you wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at McDonalds. The smell doesn't come off with a shower, or with two. It didn't come off at all until a couple of weeks after I quit.

      Do they really pay $9/hour now? I was getting $3/hour in the early '80s. Canadian. It was the "youth minimum wage" or some bullshit like that - as if I made any less money for the corporate masters than an adult would.

      Not that it matters - even at $9 they'd be making an ungodly amount of money off of you for helping to feed the Amazon to cattle and pollute your customers' with their renderings.

      Telemarketing, tech support, fast food are all about the same. Janitorial work is pretty noble though (except at McDonalds - the only thing better than feeding reprocessed rain forest soil n' sunlight to fat bastards is cleaning it up when they puke it all over the bathroom - ah memories).

    7. Re:And you wonder... by lubricated · · Score: 1

      in my state minimum wage is above $7.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
  45. HP email support is really good by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been having some outstanding support from HP lately. I just bought a laptop from them last month, and had a number of questions for them regarding upgrades and repartitioning my hard drive to dual boot linux and windows. I'm very impressed and glad that I went with HP.

    - Their technicians have responded within 24 hours (usually within 2 hours) to all my emails.

    - They provided useful information without a load of sales pitch and other BS (minimal indemnification and warnings where prudent and necessary)

    - The replies were in good English using complete sentences and proper technical document style and language.

    - They told me up front they don't support linux (reasonable because there's so many distros and different ways to configure linux; I'd have expected REAL linux support if they were selling/endorsing a particular distro, of course), yet their techs went ahead and gave assistance with setting up the partitions for dual-booting anyway! (I wasn't just wiping the drive, but needed to re-size the partition so I could avoid having to reinstall, configure, and tweak all the WinXP stuff, and they were very helpful and responsive to my requests for information.)

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:HP email support is really good by elviscious · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the email support is the only good part of working at an HP call center.

      I used to work for MCI, which was the outsourcer for HP. We support the HP Pavillion computers, and most of the HP Deskjets. Eventually got a lot of the photosmart printers too.

      All that was great, but unfortunately what this guy describes is exactly the experience that I went through at MCI.

      What I hated the most about working there was excatly this guys problem. Solving problems did not matter at all. The only things that matter were if you got the guys serial number, model, referred him to the HP website, and thanked him for calling. The overall monitoring process was worth 100 points. I believe 5 of those were for solving the guys problem.

      I don't know how many times I would sit there and yell at my supervisors about how this was just plain ridiculous. But they didn't care. Not only was the company, and the call center responsible for getting answering a huge number of calls, but the supervisors needed to make sure that the ACL (average call length) and the monitor scores were as high (or in the case of call times, low) as they could possibly be.

      I don't know how many people I saw that would send out a new power cable to fix a printer that wouldn't was smearing ink.

      Ahhh, good times were had by all

  46. /equip tinfoil beanie by Puggles · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Sorry about the forced ad-viewing - it only last about 10 seconds, and the article is worth it."

    alteran is obviously the owner of the advertisement! It's a consipracy!

    --

    Pereant, inquit, qui ante nos nostra dixerunt.
    "Confound those who have said our remarks before us."
  47. A good experience with Dell... by tcopeland · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...I called their tech support last week and ended up with a guy in Panama whose English was fine. He had me run some hard drive diagnostics and figured out that it had some errors, so he had a new one shipped to me and I got it two days later.

    The whole call only took about 5 minutes, and now my laptop is happy again. Good times.

    1. Re:A good experience with Dell... by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even a stopped clock is right twice everyday.

      --
      There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
    2. Re:A good experience with Dell... by friendscallmelenny · · Score: 1

      This is should be modded indicative not informative. This comment is why TS stays the way it is. Your hard drive was probably fine. They send you a new one, get you off the phone and you are happy, just like the article says.

    3. Re:A good experience with Dell... by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      Even a stopped clock is right twice everyday.
      Not if it's a digital clock.
      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    4. Re:A good experience with Dell... by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      I guess you didn't get one of the interns. :)

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    5. Re:A good experience with Dell... by fltsimbuff · · Score: 1

      Dell's support is mostly awful... I work for an unnamed ISP doing DSL support... Both me, as well as other agents have had to call Dell on a customer's behalf, because Dell was just sending them back to us. One agent was speaking to Dell, and it took them 15 minutes and 3 different Dell techies before he convinced someone that a known OS issue that is actually in the MS KB, was actually an OS issue. After the Dell agent did the necessary steps, they ran into another error that even we know results from the Local area connection under XP being Disabled in the network settings, but the techie immediately blamed the ISP.

      Not to mention you can usually barely understand what they are saying, most of them are in India.

    6. Re:A good experience with Dell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you got a giver. Glad it wasn't a punter, eh?

    7. Re:A good experience with Dell... by Grimster · · Score: 1

      So someone used a combination "giver" and "formatter" technique on you?

      Give the harddrive, which requires the format. Customer happy, problem solved.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
    8. Re:A good experience with Dell... by tcopeland · · Score: 1

      > So someone used a combination "giver"
      > and "formatter" technique on you?

      Touche!

    9. Re:A good experience with Dell... by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 1

      Touche' ;)

      --
      There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
  48. They're not all this bad. by soluzar22 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not by a long way are all of the tech support call centres this bad. I have a buddy who works in one, and I myself once undertook the training to work for the same one. Which one? Not telling, sorry... suffice it to say that they're pretty big. It only took them a week or so to decide that we were not compatible. My fault. I have a smart mouth when it comes to tech issues, y' know?

    Anyway, they weren't all hardcore geeks, but they were all computer literate, the guys in my induction group. The instructor was a distinctly non-techie type of chap, but they called in the real techies for some sessions. The suit was only to educate us in the fine art of customer service, and company policy. Don't judge all call centres by this article, please. T

  49. The not so simple solution by Joe+U · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tech support is horrible because the customers are letting it get horrible.

    Complain. Often, constantly, daily. Write letters, not email, call every day.

    Tie up their support phone lines to the point where nothing gets done. Tie up their sales lines as well.

    Demand to speak to the president of the company.

    File complaints with every consumer group you can find.

    Write to magazines, tell them how horrible the support is, tell them you hate the products.

    If the company has 12,000 unresolved complaints filed with the BBB in a 2 month period, what do you think will happen to their customer service?

    More important to them, what do you think will happen to their stock price?

    1. Re:The not so simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the problem with the first tactic is that outsourced customer support firms get paid by the call. they want you to call back every day.

      if you want solutions, go through corporate channels as you suggested. pick an email address off their sales site and rant that way. send snail mail to their R&D departments.

      most importantly is log your displeasure with the BBB.

    2. Re:The not so simple solution by Dr.+Mojura · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Man, I wish I had as much free time as you do. Next time I have a problem with customer service, I'll give you their info, and let you handle the process ;-)

      Seriously though, while I agree that this form of action is the only really effective way to make a change, most people (myself included) I doubt have the patience/time to coerce the company to change their policies. It's much easier to complain to the point where you get your answer/result, and then leave it at that. Sad, I know...

      --
      "Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion." - Democritus
    3. Re:The not so simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, if you don't like the tech-support a company provides...

      DON'T BUY FROM THAT COMPANY.

      *Then* write to them about how their tech-support sucks and why that's the reason you went with another vendor.

      Corporations don't give a damn about customer satisfaction. They care about the bottom line. They'll only worry about the former when it hurts the latter.

    4. Re:The not so simple solution by Cynikal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i used to work for a call center that got its bussiness from a large isp here in canada. signed an NDA, cant mention names.

      basically the way it worked was you call me, i WANTED to help you, but the help you need would take 15+ minutes of my time. people who did not maintain an average call time of 10 minutes get let go. Now, i may try to be a nice guy and help as many people as i can, but having income and feeding my family is just a tad more important to me than your adsl connection. Now the script thats provided is designed to work in a certain amount of time, as well as the huge list of things we wont support. i had a choice, go with the not so helpful and make you call more often script, or go with my own learned knowledge of troubleshooting and get you working as best i can.

      at the end of the month, buddy who doesnt know that much, but follows the script to the letter, pisses people off (but since he followed procedures, his ass is covered), wastes a bunch of callers' time.. well he gets an award at the end of the month cause his call times ae so low. I on the other hand who spent the month bending over backwards (helping you find that mac address to your router instead of having you call the manufacturer, then call us back and waste more of your time) well i get a warning letter that if my stats dont improve, i will be let go...

      the people you talk to on the other end of the phone are people too, and its not their fault that they have to be so unhelpful. in alot of cases they arent ignorant unhelpful bastards, they're just told that customer satisfaction and first call resolution takes a back seat to call times and call volume handled.

      i tried playing the game for a while, but i never felt right comming home knowing that i really didnt HELP many people at all. so i went back to trying to help as much as possible, but found it impossible to maintain a low call time average while actually doing something for the customer. in the end i was let go because i "did not fit the company's bussiness profile" even though i did recieve several citations when an extreemely satisfied customer would write in praising my professionalism.

      bitch and whine all you want, you're still not gonna be heard.. and that guy you talked to once a long time ago who went above and beyond? well go down to the ei office and you might meet up with him again.

    5. Re:The not so simple solution by dsplat · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are variations on this that do work wonders. One rule of thumb I read years ago is that a satisfied customer refers 5 people to you, a dissatisfied customer refers 20 people away. Most of the businesses I encounter don't fall far enough into either category for me to care. For the few that do, I tell my friends, my family, and everyone else who asks. Think about it every time you recommend something to someone. Say things like, "Definitely try X, I absolutely love mine. And stay away from Y, they suck, and here's why."

      Also, there are times when having the free time is worthwhile. If you are dealing with some place with a local office, call. If they hang up, show up in person to ask them why they hung up. It really scares people when you show up at their office and ask to speak to the manager about an employee who hung up on you a hour ago.

      There are other things you can do. Right now, telemarketting is illegal in the US except for charities, surveys, political campaigns and people you are already doing business with. That's easy enough. I tell the charities that they shouldn't expect another dime from me until they haven't called for two years. I lie on surveys. And I'm really good at saying, "As a matter of fact, if I don't do business with you, you aren't allowed to call me, so I'd like to cancel my account. Can you process that for me right now?" So far the politicians aren't bothering me much.

      --
      The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
    6. Re:The not so simple solution by fltsimbuff · · Score: 1

      Not how it works at all... Call centers have certain performance metrics to maintin, therefore they opt to meet those to keep their client's business rather than to try and make a "quick buck" at the expense of the account.

    7. Re:The not so simple solution by matt_morgan · · Score: 1

      The better, easier way is to buy white-box computers. Support sucks so bad these days there is no reason to buy a Dell, Gateway, HP/Compaq, whatever. Save 20% buying a computer with no support, instead. That'll send a message to the big manufacturers.

    8. Re:The not so simple solution by smooge · · Score: 1

      Having seen this at a large corporation:

      1) Their customer service staff will be canned because it will help show something is being done.

      2) Their stock price will go up because layoffs are good.

      3) You will get put in the crank list of a lot of magazines because you have hurt their possible advertisers.

      --
      -- SJS smooge at smoogespace dot com
    9. Re:The not so simple solution by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      Tech support is horrible because the customers are letting it get horrible.

      Complain. Often, constantly, daily. Write letters, not email, call every day.
      ...
      Write to magazines, tell them how horrible the support is, tell them you hate the products.


      If you're going to put that much work into solving the problem, there is imho a better option: learn your equipment well enough to fix it yourself. What you've described is no small effort, and I for one think it would be better spent becoming self-reliant than by bitching at some faceless company.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    10. Re:The not so simple solution by CrashPoint · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Re: "Tech support is horrible because the customers are letting it get horrible."

      Not merely "letting". Customers are actively making it horrible.

      Re: Complain. Often, constantly, daily. Write letters, not email, call every day.

      Letters and phone calls are as easy to ignore as emails, and less likely to be seen in the first place.

      Re: "Tie up their support phone lines to the point where nothing gets done."

      Yes, because your chance to rave fruitlessly at yet another phone lackey is so much more important than the other guy's chance to actually get his problem solved. Fuck the next guy on hold, you need the illusion of being in control, and you need it now, dammit!

      Re: "Tie up their sales lines as well"

      Sit on hold for 15+ minutes to talk to someone who'll transfer me to tech in 15 seconds? Yeah, that's stickin' it to The Man all right.

      Re: "Demand to speak to the president of the company."

      (laughs hysterically for five minutes)

      No matter how many times I hear it, it's still funny when someone thinks they're going to accomplish something with a ludicrous demand like that. Why not save time and just say, "Hello. I am an egotistical cretin with an overblown sense of my own importance. Please feel free to marginalize and ignore me."?

      Re: "File complaints with every consumer group you can find."

      At last, a tactic with a somewhat reasonable chance at eventual success. I knew you'd hit on one eventually.

      Re: "Write to magazines, tell them how horrible the support is, tell them you hate the products."

      A given magazine typically publishes one, perhaps two, such letters in a month. Better make yours really good, unless you're blowing the editor or something.

      Re: "If the company has 12,000 unresolved complaints filed with the BBB in a 2 month period, what do you think will happen to their customer service?"

      Here's what will happen: They'll find a few scapegoats, make a haphazard round or two of random firings, pick a new (and equally meaningless) internal slogan, shuffle around departmental responsibilities a trifling amount, and then congratulate themselves on their l337 consumer-relations skillz. In other words, nothing.

      Re: "More important to them, what do you think will happen to their stock price?"

      Still nothing. Investors care about how much scratch the company makes, not how long its customers spend on hold. And very few of them see a connection between the two.

    11. Re:The not so simple solution by AVee · · Score: 1

      Tech support is horrible because the customers are letting it get horrible.

      Excuse me? I've had several ISP's over the last year, the first one (dail-in) got some calls, all fixed within about 3 minutes. These guys just knew the answers to questions. The next ISP has been called very often, the reason is simple, stuf simply didn't work. The last one hasn't been called in the year i'm their customer, same simple reason, stuff simply works...

      It's really that simple, don't sell crap. That will keep people away from your helpdesk more than anything else.

    12. Re:The not so simple solution by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Some accounts at outsourced call centers this really does work - but for companies who could care less (Dell for instance - since they own most of the market) it really doesn't do any good unless the responce to bad tech support is overwhelming.

      And when you work in a call center that can handle over 20,000 calls per day it would have to be very very very overwhelming.

    13. Re:The not so simple solution by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Demand to speak to the president of the company.

      Yes sir, I'll transfer you right to the president of the company, right after these monkeys fly out of my butt.

      Do you really expect a tech support rep to be able (or allowed) to transfer you to the president of the company? If you really want to have a chance to talk to the prez, find the corporate office number and navigate your way through it. Tech support won't be able to transfer you there no matter how much you want it.

    14. Re:The not so simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sister worked at an Internet bill paying firm. They have an entire group in their call center which is called the "President's Office." When an irate customer demands to speak to the "president of the company", they are simply routed to this department which is staffed with regular support techs trained to give the illusion that the customer is speaking to the president or at least the president's assistant.

      Amazing.

    15. Re:The not so simple solution by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. Of course they are not going to transfer you to the president of the company. The important thing is that you make it known that you are extremely dissatisfied. And the idea is not to have just one person complaining, it's to have lots of people complaining, over and over and over.

      Eventually, it does make a difference.

      By the way, these were examples, not a rulebook. Do you always take everything that literally, or do you run a customer service center?

    16. Re:The not so simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The important thing is that you make it known that you are extremely dissatisfied."

      And guess what, they don't give a shit or can't do shit. You are wasting your time.

      "Eventually, it does make a difference."

      Nonsense.

    17. Re:The not so simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you usually let people walk all over you?

  50. I remember when... by trveler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back in '92 I called MS tech support with a windows com port problem. The guy I got actually knew what he was talking about, diagnosed it in under 2 minutes. I still remember how he would say "hmmm.... baddah baddah baddah...." while he was typing on his keyboard. Anyway, he even called me back on the east coast and read me a "debug" script to nail down the "floating com port" problem.

    What I wouldn't give for those days....

    --
    ... is whot bwings os tugevza tsuzay.
    1. Re:I remember when... by afgates · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ah I remember that Debug Script. Back in da' day for Windows 3.11 support we used that bad boy all the time. These were in the days of prePnP so we would have to move mice and modems and sound cards (oh my!) to resolve various interrupt conflicts. The great part of this script was teaching a customer how to use Debug. For many it was their first time to see what memory actually looked like, and a glimpse on how their computer actually thought. They felt empowered. I went and dug up this old script for posterity.

      Build a file com.txt

      E40:0
      F8 03 F8 02 E8 03 E8 02
      q

      run Debug com.txt, shake with one pentium math error and enjoy.

    2. Re:I remember when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Back in the really old days, savvy Microsoft customers would place their support calls in the evening.

      All the people who tried to economize on His Billness's time would have left for the day, and callers would get tech support from Bill Gates.

      This is the New Mexico era I'm talking about here.

    3. Re:I remember when... by bodland · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was there baby! Win 3.1 team in 1995 with Softmart in Madison. The only DOS support was there too. They ended up with 95, I did that too. We were good. Sykes and Kean's cust sat numbers sucked compared to ours...

    4. Re:I remember when... by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

      Back in, oh, December 2003 I was diagnosing a problem with Windows NT SBS 4 (not 4.5). We called Microsoft to open a ticket, and were told they needed to hunt down the person who could still support NT SBS. We got someone in the phone, in his house, who said he would call us back in 15 minutes after he got some coffee. He knew his stuff forwards and backwards, our problem was resolved in about thirty minutes. It came down to "have you tried just deleting the file?".

  51. Re:Oversea tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously only Indians will be left to buy anything.

  52. Horribly Untrue by Pizzop · · Score: 0

    I've worked for this, and honestly this isn't even close to the experience I had. Of course there is a few bad eggs who were punters (no givers, since we only did DSL support), and even a few people who would just randomly drop calls. But I (and almost all of my coworkers) worked to get the customer's problem fixed.

  53. Welcome to the Internet Help Desk by hayne · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you haven't seen it already, go to the Three Dead Trolls in a Baggie web site and watch their "Welcome to the Internet Help Desk" video.

  54. Lol by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Everytime I think I need to invest in anger management, someone shows me I'm not that bad. Thanks for the laugh "fuckwit"! Great stuff.

    1. Re:Lol by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      Didnt I tell you to fucking die?
      No?
      Well fucking die.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  55. The joys of being a formatter... by Channard · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... since that's what the company I used to work for Tech Support had us doing (thankfully, my current employers are a world away from that). Before any return could be authorised, you had to advise the end user to reimage, or there was no return. If you hadn't done this - and the users couldn't lie since the reimage gave out a number we could check on - no return. But here's where it got really sneaky. Not only did people who didn't buy an extended warrantee for their home PC have to spend 50p - 1.00 a minute on the phone, but they also got no reimage disc. So to get their PCs returned, they needed to reimage, but couldn't reimage without a disc. I doubt this was legal, but we ended up advising users that they had to buy an extended warrantee to get a reimage disc. Or pay 50 pounds for a reimage disc! For a disc which cost maybe 50p tops to make. There are so many tips and tricks the article only skims the surface. Rings a lot of bells for me though.

  56. Re:Sounds like someone has a case of the Mondays. by Perl_Monk · · Score: 0

    Okay, first of all it IS "Initech" with an "I".

    Here is an auction for the Bill Lumberg coffee mug!, just in case you would want one on your desk...

    -
    Vidi Vici Veni!

  57. Tried this for a summer.. frustrating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked tech support for a summer. The most frustrating part was having people saying, "Come on, Bob, you're a professional, you should know these things" when in fact 1) I'm getting paid $7 an hour and 2) the question he's asking is totally out of our "scope".

    Not to mention, our retention rate was much worse than for the class in the article. 12 of us started training, 6 made it out (after 3 weeks), and when I left after 10 weeks there was no one else in my group left.

  58. The second mantra... by Channard · · Score: 2, Informative

    .. which isn't as important as the first, or when I wasn't working in my now non-crappy job, is 'it's a training issue'. Quite useful.

  59. Re: Sweet, Blessed Violation of copyright laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks so much for the repost. Salon is crap for making anyone jump through flaming hoops of crap to get to their advertisement-supported content. While nothing is worth that crap, this article was well worth the few moments you may spend in purgatory for violating crappy intellectual property laws.

  60. Retail sales are just like this... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I got trained for two days at Minneapolis' CompUSA. Then I was thrown out on the floor. At first, I had to read the boxes, just like your current favorites at Best Buy and Fry's. After awhile I remembered the crap on the sides of the box, so I could give a convincing run down of features.

    Soon, manglement decided that since they couldn't get the onhand inventory to match, they would give several of us cordless phones and have us field the 'pricing and availability' calls to the store. This was running around the store and checking to see if the product was actually there, and actually 9.95 - on top of trying to help people who had decided to physically come to the store and perhaps buy something.

    The best part was when you were telling someone about an expensive piece of hardware and some call comes in (we weren't allowed to ignore calls) for the price of a printer cable, or if we have the '20 CDs for 20 bucks' deal in.

    I had one guy go off and scream at me, to which I responded, "Please go back there and talk to Rick. He's the boss. I am doing the job(S) he gave me. Tell him he's a fucking moron." He responded, "YOU'RE THE FUCKING MORON" and stormed out.

    I tried to tell the boss what bad service this was causing, and he said, "You need to try harder." Grrr.

    About three weeks later, the phones disappeared, and I was back to software. And hardware!

    At this time, I didn't own a computer of any sort, as they were unattainable on my hourly rate. And here I am trying to sell them. Ugh. I gave up my fakery and lies. I became a 'troublemaker'. If I didn't know if software did a certain something, I would crack the box and read the manual (this was discouraged) even if it was for my own education. If someone wanted a telphone, fax machine, or sound card, I told them that the 'extended warranty' was a ripoff.

    I became well versed in the Mac line we carried, and sold a lot of them because I liked them, and they were easy for the customer to demo themselves.

    People seemed to like my honesty. And I learned more about selling, and sold more than lots of smarmy 'say-anythings' there, because I only sold the stuff I knew, and liked. Of course, I quit not long after for other reasons. After that, I was well on my way to knowing my stuff, and built my first computer out of Salvation Army parts.

    Oh, lots of retail stories came out of that evil place...

  61. Having recently been outsourced by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the IT dept of a very large phone manufacturer to an even larger outsourcing company, I can reveal that my job is now no longer to fix problems and design solutions to help my colleagues, it is instead, to make money at the expense of my former colleagues.

    Unlike the article, we do currently actually fix the problems, but guess what. Now 60% of fixes have to be within 24 hours, so what do you do with troublesome customers? Ticket goes on "waiting for customer" immediately, call them back at lunchtime, three calls and it gets closed. The metrics look good.

    That Apache upgrade? Not part of baseline break/fix. Now costs you money and 3 days of my time (how much per hour?) as we update the OS, apache rev, modules. Oh, it broke your application? But you approved the change managment and we don't support homegrown applications.

    Grid computing. Yum. $100/month/machine for supporting workstations becomes $1,000/month/machine as the desktops are migrated to *clustered* servers in the machine room. And you thought it was such a good idea before the outsourcing, at least they aren't on your budget, I wonder is it corporate who're taking the financial hit as the numbers of supported servers rockets?

    Out of hours support? I'm off at 5 mate. Hourly rates double in the evening and double again at the weekend. And they start in 3 digits. What? You want a production system upgraded at the weekend? Oh you need a DBA and Financials administrator as well? And that 100Gb restore which is taking 10 hours? You get billed for every second which is out of baseline hours.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Having recently been outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, but what the fuck are you talking about exactly? Not one of your paragraphs makes any sense. Maybe you should take a little bit of all this money you're apparently making, and invest in some English lessons?

  62. Internet Help Desk by pilgrim23 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There is a comedy routine put out by a fellow named "Wes" from the group "Three Dead Trolls in a Baggie" (No I am NOT kiding, that IS their name!) called "Internet Help Desk". FUNNY! and it says about the same thing this article does. Several sites for it are out there so I won't post a single one to get slash dotted. You can Google for it. If you have difficulties with that, Please call the Help Desk.

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  63. That Loni fellow, by John+Courtland · · Score: 1
    seems like he's well on the way to becoming a bona fide BOFH:
    Loni is a punter...

    ...Punters tell customers that their problem is not really with their computer, but with their software, their printer, their phone lines, solar flares, whatever they can make sound believable. Then a punter will look at the piece of paper hanging above their phone and read you those four magic words.
    Compare to this from http://bofh.ntk.net/Bastard1.html:
    A user rings

    "Do you know why the system is slow?" they ask

    "It's probably something to do with..." I look up today's excuse ".. clock speed"
    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  64. The worst by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The worst part of this whole setup is the poor, clueless end-user, who actually thinks tech support knows what they're doing.

    I work in the repair department at a large electronics store. One of my duties (other than actually repairing or upgrading computers) is "inspecting" equipment such as wireless routers to make sure that we aren't getting scammed. It burns me up when someone brings in their 3rd unit in as many days, saying, "wow, what's wrong with you guys? I've been on the phone with D-Link all day, and this is the third bad unit I've gotten". I just want to yell out, "no sir, you've been on the phone with an outsourced guy in Manilla who may or may not have ever even seen a picture of your product, and he says it's faulty because his only concern is getting you off the phone in less than fifteen minutes."

    I had a young woman come in the other day with some random Gateway desktop that looked like a CRT iMac knock-off (an all-in-one design where the mainboard and drives were installed in a section below the monitor). She plunks it down on my desk, and says, "The guy at Gateway's tech support says it needs a new video card." I took one look at this obviously completely integrated computer, and said (without thinking), "Are you sure he said that?" "Of course he said that," I thought immediately afterward, "he's tech support. He has no idea what that product even looks like. He doesn't know that the video is integrated." Just for grins I opened it up, on the off chance that there was some ghetto six-inch VGA cable that ran to an actual card. Interestingly, there actually was, but it ran from a proprietary pinout that allowed video to flow up to the monitor to a DB-15 connection on the motherboard, and power to flow down from the single AC jack that was located in the monitor . I showed the connection to the woman, then showed her a couple of video cards, and explained why they were wrong and what she could do (basically nothing, as she was outside of warranty). The funny part about the whole thing was that it looked like it was actually the CRT that was damaged, as it was exhibiting that "missing one part of the color spectrum" bit that is more often than not a CRT defect.

    It's a shame, but I don't know of any consumer computer manufacturer that has what I would call "good" tech support anymore, with the exception of Apple (and then you only get 90 days unless you spring for Applecare).

    1. Re:The worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get 1 year of AppleCare, but after 90 days you have to pay for software support. Calls that are determined to be hardware problems are still free.

    2. Re:The worst by megan_of_wutai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Erm... it's just as likely to be a broken cable, when that happens. Although perhaps less with an integrated POS like that where the cable hasn't seem much knocking, could always have been a dry joint.

      The likelihood of broken cable vs broken electron gun seems, from experience, to be weighted towards the cable in such instances of one colour failure.

    3. Re:The worst by EricWright · · Score: 1
      It's a shame, but I don't know of any consumer computer manufacturer that has what I would call "good" tech support anymore, with the exception of Apple (and then you only get 90 days unless you spring for Applecare).
      That's not true... Every piece of apple branded hardware I've bought from apple has come with a one year warranty (ibook, airport card and assorted cables). You only get 90 days on third party parts (like my d-link bluetooth adapter), but that's all the OEM gives. You don't expect Apple to extend another manufacturer's warranty, do you?
    4. Re:The worst by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, I don't expect them to give out extended warranties. I was referring to technical support, which Apple considers a different thing.

      You get 1 year of actual warranty against defect. But if a user needs tech support, they get 90 days (unless the poster above is correct about it being one year if the problem is hardware related).

      So your iBook has 1 year of warranty. But if for some weird-ass reason your software update isn't working properly, you only have 90 days of support from apple for that particular aspect (unless it happens to be something relating to a failure of your NIC, for example).

      Tech support isn't something most /.ers ever really have to use, but it something that a lot of the non-techy world does occasionally need; unfortunately, most of the time it's piss poor.

    5. Re:The worst by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 1

      I did reseat the cable and clean the contacts of the weird-ass connector, just to make sure, but even if it had been the cable I would've had to get bootleg and splice some crap to fix it. While I'd happily try it for my sister's machine, that's not something I'll do in a professional environment.

      Picture the mainboard, sitting under an RF shield, with just a male pin connector sticking up (the connector looks similar to a section of an ISA card connection). This connection jacks into the CRT portion of the computer when you lower it onto the top and screw them together. The Power Supply is in the CRT portion. On the underside of this male pin connection is an ATX-style connector (it looked slightly different) that runs to the mobo, a couple of 4-pin molexes for the drives, and the floppy connection. The DB-15 connection jacks into the mainboard, runs as a standard cable for about 4", then breaks out into the individual conductors, which are tied up into this connection. So the connection transfers power from the PSU in the monitor, down to the mainboard and drives, and from a DB-15 on the mainboard up into the monitor. A poor design, since it could have lent itself to cable degradation, but from the standpoint of someone who's not going to break out a soldering iron to "repair" a device that I then have to warranty, it's not something that I could replace. The sad part is that because of the assembly of the unit, I couldn't power it while running VGA to an outboard monitor to test the functionality without cutting into the case, so really had my hands tied behind my back on that one.

    6. Re:The worst by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      The funny part about the whole thing was that it looked like it was actually the CRT that was damaged, as it was exhibiting that "missing one part of the color spectrum" bit that is more often than not a CRT defect.

      Actually, that's usually fixable in about five minutes by anyone with soldering skills and no fear of high voltage. Very, very common problem on certain legacy Apple monitors (OEM'd from Mitsubishi or Hitachi, IIRC), and a great way to get a halfway-decent monitor for free, because nobody wants to deal with fixing them. If she comes back, send her to a local television repair shop -- they usually see this kind of thing a lot, and should be able to fix it fairly cheaply.

      Of course, it *is* a Gateway AIO, which makes it basically useless anyway...

      p

  65. No Popup if you have subscribed by grungeman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is not popup ad if you have subscribed to Salon, which really does not cost the world. I am in Germany and I figured that subscribing to Salon would be my little contribution to keep the critical media in the US alive. And they need critical media more than ever over there.

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
  66. Re:Oversea tech support by Fastolfe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If we farm all of our jobs out to India, who will be left to buy anything?

    Indians, of course.

    Globalization will balance everything out in the long run, but the first few hundred years are going to piss a lot of people off.

    The USA is increasingly catering to companies and those that own them, at the expense of the individual. Taken to an extreme perspective, the USA might be seen as a land of corporations surrounded by a sea of poverty, an extreme polarization of wealth.

    Fortunately there are a few things that can't really be moved overseas (today, at least). Things like person-to-person service, sales, government, construction. Well, and lawyers. And crime. As other jobs dry up and move to less wealthy nations, these industries will probably boom. But in the end salaries will balance out just about everywhere. The only way you might outperform local salary averages is if your position requires physical proximity, and many don't, nowadays.

    What can you do? Buy some stock.

  67. I have a tale myself by wizman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The one I worked for was a bit different. Small Internet Providers throughout the country contracted us to handle their technical support for them. Since many of these were "mom and pop" operations with just a few hundred customers in one city, they relied heavily on maintaining that local image. As a result, we were NEVER, EVER allowed to give any indication that we were not located in the area the person was calling from. I remember talking to customers of a Florida ISP about how nice the weather is, when in fact I'm sitting in Toledo, Ohio (hint to the company's identity?) in a snowstorm. If we were asked for our location, we had to respond that we were not permitted to give out details on our location due to security concerns. I had to give that line a few times a day.

    We also had to be crafty. Although some "premium" customers had dedicated phone numbers so that we could find out which ISP they were calling for, many of the individual ISP's calls were routed to a common toll free number, so we'd have no idea as to which of the hundreds of ISP's we do support for the caller is from. We answer the call generically ("Tech Support, how may I assist you?") and usually asked for the customer's e-mail address for an indication of which ISP they were with. The domain name would give away the ISP. Unfortunately, people often did not give the domain name, or had offsite e-mail accounts. Since we couldn't give away that we were not with "their ISP", I couldn't flat out ask. I'd have to narrow it down by area code, and then search between ISP's in that area to find out who they were with -- often taking 10-15 minutes.

    I remember one time management signed a deal and gave the call center side a chance to prepare. It was a HUGE customer - larger than all of our other ISP's combined. One night, on my shift, they simply forwarded the tech support number over to us. We went from an average 3 minute call queue time to well over an hour. We did not have the staff to handle the calls, and had no information at all about the specifics of the ISP -- dialup numbers, e-mail servers, etc. It was days before we even had the correct info to give customers. In the meantime, we just had to go with it.

    And finally, we had no training program at all, so the company tried to hire people from an outsourcer in the area who had already been through their hideous training program. We paid a dollar an hour more, so it was usually pretty easy to do. Unfortunately, we supported dialup customers, and the company we stole people from supported cable modems, so new hirees usually knew nothing of dialup.

    I lasted about six months there surprisingly. When I started it was a small operation with only a dozen or so techs. By the time I left, they had on average 30-40 people per shift. We grew so fast that they had to temporarily build a room in the warehouse and put up folding tables to make room for the new call center people. I'm sure they are much bigger by now, but probably still working out of the warehouse.

    1. Re:I have a tale myself by PugMajere · · Score: 1

      Well, the *other* company in Toledo is Convergys, right?

      Not sure what the place you worked at is called, but I know someone that works at Convergys.

  68. It's NOT only overseas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The scripting is bad, the fact that they can't operate outside the script is abhorrant."

    I've got news for all of you. It's not just overseas tech support who are "not knowledgeable" and rely strictly on pre-written steps and scripts to resolve problems. It's just about every tech support of a large company I've dealt with, in Canada and the US.

    My ISP "Sympatico" has this problem. My dealings with McAfee tech support results in the same thing. No matter what you tell them, they step you through the same ridiculous "newbie" steps regardless of what you tell them you've done or discovered already. In fact, McAfee described to me 5 or 6 steps to take which basically could have been summarized as "completely uninstall the software and then re-install it"--Somethign I had already done and told them so!

  69. Using the wrong metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Obviously, they're using the wrong metric.

    Support is being paid for by manufacturers as a necessary cost of doing business so that customer satisfaction remains high enough to:

    - prevent them from being sued
    - get repeat business from satisfied customers

    So they have to balance costs with customer satisfaction.

    Rather than allowing their support contractors to use strict call times as measurement, they should be doing follow-up customer satisfaction surveying in some percentage (1%?) of the cases, and weighting that more heavily than call time.

    In fact, quite a bit of this follow-up surveying is done, but apparently not by whomever this author was working for (unless he was distorting the facts to make a punchier article, heavens forbid).

    If this is in fact going on, it's clear that the fault is with the managers who are using the wrong metric to determine success. This is easily changed.

  70. Re:Oversea tech support by cthrall · · Score: 1

    Called IBM Rational tech support 'cause the site didn't explain how to upgrade from older Purify to latest Purify. Get shunted to India. "Open a browser and go to h t t p colon slash slash..."

    I was punted (RTFA) to the same freakin' website I came from...what a joke. Eventually I found a more specific number, mostly by randomly jabbing at my phone with a dialing wand while in phone menu hell.

  71. It's the "Kens" that make the job worth it by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have a "Ken" at my current support job. Sometimes I overhear the conversations and I laugh to the point of tears and suffocation. He has what I call "Tech Support Tourettes" and uses the mute button on his headset to great effect.

    Whenever I start to get frustrated with calls, I simply take a five second break and listen in on "Ken". He is the office stress reliever and we have a pool going around on when he is going to kick the bucket. I think that is the only reason the company keeps him, as mental health for the rest of us.

    My most memorable incident recalls a customer who had the unfortunate luck of calling in to "Ken" to complain and make legal threats. Sharp as ever, "Ken" transferred him to our "Legal Department" (we don't have one that I know of) at extension 600. Funny thing is, our extensions only go to the mid 500's, so no one was going to answer the call and the guy would wait on hold potentially forever.

    Did I mention he deals exclusively with Macs? I can't imagine what would happen if moved to PC support. Probably could replace his chair with a coffin.

    1. Re:It's the "Kens" that make the job worth it by Grimster · · Score: 1

      Our "Ken" was named John, and this was at a small mom&pop local PC store I worked in the late 90's.

      His mantra was "educate the customer" but he should have added "whether they like it or not" he'd sometimes spend hours with a customer teaching them why their system screwed up and what they did to screw it up, whether they wanted to hear the lecture or not, I've even heard him say (something like) "look I can't help you if you won't listen to what I'm telling you else this will just happen again".

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
  72. luckily not all tech support is like this by muckdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For some companies that service niche markets like ours does this is not the case. We have less than 10 full time tech support people but the average experience they have working for this company is likely 5-6 years. The difference is that customers pay (a lot actually) for the support but are happy to pay it. Also the tech support people here are actually paid reasonable salaries. While this model works for niche markets I don't think it would work for larger markets like say Dell laptop support, expect to continue getting crappy support there.

  73. You married a fish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *no text*

  74. Re:I used to love this when I was on a helpdesk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Where'd you copy that from?

    Here?

  75. How? by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do the American consumers gain? What prices have went down because of outsourcing to India/China? What is now cheaper?

    1. Re:How? by exhilaration · · Score: 0, Troll

      Aren't Dells like under $400 now? I paid $3200 in the summer of 1997 for a top of the line Gateway (PII 266). Now I can get a top of the line 3+ Ghz PC from Dell for under $500.

    2. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I can get a top of the line 3+ Ghz PC from Dell for under $500

      Wow, you can get a 3.4GHz P4 Extreme Edition system with 1 GB of RAM, 500GB Serial ATA HD, a RADEON 9800 PRO with 256MB of RAM, with a Gigabit Ethernet card for under $500?

      Amazing!

    3. Re:How? by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can't get a top of the line system for 500...

    4. Re:How? by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1

      The price of computers hasn't really changed since 1978. A Top of Line system is around $3000, Middle tier about $1500-$2200, and cheap shit is always available for under $1000. The only thing that changes is what you get for that money. It just so happens that software and hardware have improved faster than the demands placed on a system by an "average" user have - systems haven't gotten cheaper, they've gotten better faster than you have.

  76. This is not Great Britian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    "punt", from American football, "to give up on a failed offensive drive and kick the ball to the other team"

    1. Re:This is not Great Britian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a rugby term originally.

    2. Re:This is not Great Britian by julesh · · Score: 4, Funny



      Yep, that's still Warwick Castle. I think I'm definitely in Great Britain.

    3. Re:This is not Great Britian by babyrat · · Score: 1

      "punt", from American football, "to give up on a failed offensive drive and kick the ball to the other team"



      "American Football" - Football historians, those who have studied the game and its origins, place the game's beginnings in rugby, an English game played with many similarities to football. Rugby began in eighteen twenty-three at the famous Rugby Boys' School in England. (from here )

      Punting is definitely prevalent in Rugby...so, we are back to Great Britain.

    4. Re:This is not Great Britian by benja · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, this is not Great Britain, this is Slashdot, which is internal... internatina... intranationa... oh fuck, it's all-American anyway. (See also here for how to filter out uninformed comments like the one you replied to.)

    5. Re:This is not Great Britian by mvdw · · Score: 1

      Q. Why do the Irish nickname their currency the "punt"?

      A. Because it rhymes with "Bank Manager".

  77. Article image by dryan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do they have a picture of some bloke phoning a sex line next to the article.

    1. Re:Article image by Grimster · · Score: 1

      Haha no mod points but this is definitely +1 Funny because I loaded the image again and laughed.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
  78. Now it all makes sense.. by bobdotorg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Karen is part of a growing group called givers.

    When looked at in a tech support experience sort of way, the whole Goatse Giver / Receiver model seems apt, as a long drawn out episode with tech support will often lead to one feeling like the receiver.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  79. Worse than Initech? by AaronGTurner · · Score: 1

    Makes working for Initech seem good. "Well, I'm
    going to have to... disagree with you there".

    By the way - have you done those TPS reports yet?

  80. Wow, this is the industry I helped create? by dinkle123 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't this interesting, I created one of the first predictive dialers in the industry and created call and data transfer for MCI in the 80's.. I wonder what horrible things the software I create today will be used for?

    --
    Don't Try to Outweird me, I get stranger things than you with my breakfast cereal every morning
  81. I don't get it. Dell is famous for crap support an by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I don't get it. Dell is famous for crap support and yet people keep buying from them. Don't respond with "dell gave me great support" I am not talking about you. I am talking to the people that keep coming back to have their asskicked.

    I always hear it from people that tech support doesn't help at all. Then why do you buy from those companies and not from some local shop were you get support in person? Cause dell offers phone tech support. ARGH.

    Personally I rarely use tech support in fact the only calls in a years time were to my isp to get a new password. Simple stuff and still it took a good ten minutes.

    Outsourced tech support is known to be crap. They get paid per call not by satisfied customer. Anyone with a single braincell can then figure out what kinda personal they want. It is also easy to figure out the kinda callers they desire. Idiots that can be made to call time and time again but for short calls.

    Until people start voting with their dollars and take their business elsewhere companies like dell will see nothing wrong and keep outsourcing their tech support with the same pay per call contracts.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  82. Re:Oversea tech support by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

    Before you go nuts on the Indian "support" centers, remember that they're just doing what they're paid to do. Your US based Head Office is demanding exactly what they are giving. They will have had "negative feedback" about accents and off-shore outsourcing, so HQ has probably told them to be appear more localized (read pretend to be American).

    I hate dealing with them as well*, however SlashGeeks are not the typical end user. Most people will have even less knowledge than these guys, and *need* to go through each step. Having said that, the entrapment bullshit you speak of is pretty shitty.

    *I purposely mess up the scripts, when dealing with telecoms, pizza shops, tech lines, etc. I'm a person and so are they - fuck the corporate mindlessness.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  83. ok gotta rat em out, I used to work for this place by hellraizr · · Score: 5, Informative
    no love for them, gotta do it. THIS COMPANY IS CALLED *THE ANSWER GROUP*. they are based out of north lauderdale FL (right out side ft lauderdale). website is http://www.tag2.com. although I have no idea why it goes to a hughes network site, check out the whois info on the domain, my claims will be backed up.

    just to give my fellow slashdotters an idea of what working for this company is like:

    they employ over 5,000 of the worst possbile computer illiterates I've ever seen. most have never even seen the inside of a computer. they specificly say during interview "We do not prefer experience or certifications. we will give any one with computer knowledge a job but prefer that *we* train you"

    they pay $11/hr WHILE logged into the phone, minimum wage when not logged in (which btw will be most of the time).

    security is soo tight there all employees are run through a metal detector coming AND going from the complex (would say building but there are 6 of them). I asked once why they did this they responded "to protect the employees from the employees" referring to a couple times people started shooting guns in the call center.

    This company is evil incarnate. the place is a total sweat shop. 3-400,000 sq ft per building of cubicles. it's soo disorienting navigating the cubicle farm you have to go by the signs posted.

    Oh and everything the article said about the place is true. yes they are one of the largest support providers, they do compaq, HP and IBM, plus bellsouth/comcast, directv, and a bunch of others. All they care about is getting you off the phone in 12 minutes (thats what the dead giveaway was, totall company policy, if you spend 15 minutes you have 3 supervisors breathing down your neck). they will even go so far as you find a reason to manually disconnect @ 13 minutes telling you to call back again.

    ATTN Florida Slashdotters: Can someone back me up on this place, I know someone else has to have worked there. I can't possibly describe how bad this place really is since I only worked there 4 days, but man it did ring some bells.

    Oh btw, here's the whois info:

    Registrant:
    TAG (TAG6-DOM)
    7562 Southgate Blvd
    NORTH LAUDERDALE, FL 33068
    US

    Domain Name: TAG2.COM

    Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
    Nunez, Juan (JN8854) jnunez@TAG2.COM
    TAG
    7562 SOUTHGATE BLVD
    N LAUDERDALE, FL 33068-1362
    US
    (954) 724-6745 fax: (954) 726-0015

    Record expires on 08-May-2008.
    Record created on 07-May-1996.
    Database last updated on 23-Feb-2004 12:07:40 EST.
    Domain servers in listed order:

    CMTU.MT.NS.ELS-GMS.ATT.NET 12.127.16.69
    CBRU.BR.NS.ELS-GMS.ATT.NET 199.191.128.105

  84. BOFH by thomasdelbert · · Score: 1

    Why does this article remind me of the BOFH?

    --
    ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
  85. Similar Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a related story here:

    The Hell That Is Tech Support

  86. OK, but WHAT TO DO about it? by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    This only confirms what many of us have long suspected. Companies promise tech support but, these days, simply don't deliver.

    Any idea what to DO about it?

    How do I "vote with my dollars" when everyone is doing the same thing?

    The worst part is, I'm convinced that computer hardware and software has become less usable, and that this is part of the reason. In the old days, the need to deliver tech support provided some market discipline. If the stuff didn't work, support costs went up. But now, companies are essentially not paying for the real cost of proper tech support... and have lost the disincentive that used to inhibit the release of badly-designed products.

    1. Re:OK, but WHAT TO DO about it? by Badly+Configured · · Score: 1

      Solving the customers' problems isn't the only purpose for having a technical support line. Tech support is one of the few ways in which manufacturers can learn about problems with their products. Product quality used to be measured as the percentage returning for warranty repair. Now that most of the problems are caused by software, and not by physical failure, the number of support calls is a better metric. Product features that cause most support calls will be imporved first. Thus, it might be worth calling even if you don't get the help you wanted.

  87. Anger rating system. by rattler14 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me, or should articles like this include an anger rating system from 0 (happy child running through the meadow) to 10 (about to go ripshit in the streets of boston after someone totalled your car during rush hour traffic, preventing you from going back to your unloving wife and kids). Seriously though, after reading this article, I felt like the only just thing to do in this world would be to take down these operations, SWAT style.

    A rating would help prevent readers like myself from getting this huge adrenaline rush right before going back to the lab and running experiments requiring patience, not the ability to throw large blunt objects at retarded management.

    grumble grumble... i feel better now :)

    --
    my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
  88. Re:Sounds like someone has a case of the Mondays. by broberds · · Score: 2, Informative
    Initech is the horrible company depicted in "Office Space", a movie which should be required reading at Star Fleet Academy.

    --
    -- To Err is human, to Ignignokt divine.
  89. What's the solution? How can we take their money? by caliban02 · · Score: 1

    To me, whenever I hear stories like this, the first thing I think is: "if this sucks so much, how can I compete?"

    If something sucks in the world, it's pretty likely that there's a way to start a company and compete with them, and win. (I won't accept bad tech support as a universal constant, like death and taxes)

    I'm sure there are a few of you out there who are unemployed, (or looking for a better job) entrepreneurial, and smart, who could come up with a way to make money in this market where the competition is obviously not satisfying the demand. What kind of company would you create to compete with these terrible out-sourced call-centers? Let me hear your ideas!

  90. Comparing notes by deathofcats · · Score: 1

    Are there any websites where people can compare notes about lousy tech support?

    1. Re:Comparing notes by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      I don't know that this fits the bill totally, but the people here often have stories similar to this one, and do talk about various company's problems(sometimes - depends on whether they work for the company or not). Tech Support Comedy

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  91. Tech Support Nightmares by rholliday · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If only it were always this easy. :) I work the worst form of tech support possible: one where you interact personally with the users.

    We have Student ITS at our school, where we have to fix every little thing wrong with every crappy computer any student on campus sees fit to drop off. If I never see another stick of EDO RAM it'll be too soon ... but I digress.

    As disgusted as I am dealing with users, I'm more disgusted with this company and their "Mantra." I actually like to fix people's problems, and while formatting a computer can be so much fun, and relieve a lot of stress, dealing with the fallout wouldn't be worth "tricking" a user into it to get something done faster. Besides, I'm the one who has to sit through re-installing XP ...

    --
    Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
  92. Re:Oversea tech support by K8Fan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The scripting is bad, the fact that they can't operate outside the script is abhorrant.

    You can tell when they're reading off the script. The worst is whn they've been beaten down so throughly (i.e. "well trained") that they are completely unable to depart from the script. Of course that's viewing the situation charitably - the alternative is that they were that way to start with.

    I refer to these people as "MeatBots".

    New MeatBot TM ! It's a robot - made of meat!

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  93. I was a punter. by michael+path · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Up until about 5 years ago, I was a punter like that outlined in the story. It was highly encouraged.

    The Metrics in use favored talk time, quality, then solve rate. Solving the problem was never the preferred resolution.

    I spent 30 minutes on the phone with a highly foreign support rep who pronounced Ohio like 'Oreo'. My satisfaction with the entire call (not necessarily just the rep) was quite low. I will never buy another product from this company unless under some duress.

    What I wonder is why technical support is such an administrative afterthough for a product. Good support seems paramount in ensuring a repeat customer. I've heard several customer services paradigms, as well as actual statistics, supporting the case that it's easier and less expensive to keep existing customers than to advertise and attract new ones.

    Yes, I realize outsourcing is cheaper. Yes, I realize it's even cheaper to those to whom English is often a second language. However, I'd like to talk to some sort of peer while I'm on the phone, as I'd feel more comfortable with the support experience.

    Since this is a hardware part that I will probably replace within 3 years for the better/faster/same priced combo, I am confident that purchase won't be made from the same company.

    -m.

  94. Karma Whore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Karma Whore. Mod down.

  95. Price, Quality or Service by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    No, the answer is not to patronize those with Crappy service. But from the looks of it, service doesn't really matter much to most people here. People don't want to pay for good service, so they get cheap service and complain that it is CRAPPY.

    Price, Quality and Service. You can have only two of the three.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  96. Today only, free access courtesy of Slashdot by Thornae · · Score: 1

    Morality of reposting from Salon aside, my brain read the whole article in Ed Norton's "Fight Club" Narrator voice - you know, the "He was wearing his cornflower blue tie" one.
    Try it. It's spookily apt.

    --
    |>
    Here be Dragons
  97. Funny this. Almost the same happened to me. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Informative
    Had a seagate raptor disk die on me and a LCD develop a bad sub-pixel. Yet no trouble getting them replaced. The HD was replaced in a few minutes. Took the guy in the shop time to find a new one. No problem with explaining. Said that it was dead with not even the motor spinning up and I got a new one.

    The LCD was harder as I had to convince the staff that they had said any pixel problems was enough to get it changed and any pixel problem includes an always on red sub pixel. But got it changed.

    Yet almost all people I meet say that they prefer to buy name brands because of the warranty and phone support. Both are crap but it probably gives them a nice fuzzy feeling.

    I buy from shops and although I have needed it so far for computers it is far easier to demand to see the manager in person then it is over a phone line.

    So I got exactly one question for you. Was this the last time you bought from this company or did you vote with your dollars and say "Yes sir thank you sir can you waste my time again SIR!"

    Since the call center people work for the call center, and not the company, they have no incentive or access to institutional knowledge - you know when you tell someone about a certain model and they don't have to look everything up?

    WRONG Since people keep buying from companies with lousy support these companies have no incentive to improve tech support. The problem isn't the techs the problem is the customers who keep accepting this crap.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  98. Bad experience with Qwest by snapman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This story is absolutely true. I'm sure this will come as a shock to those who have dealt with Qwest, but I feel I must share my story...

    <rant>

    We recently dropped our long distance carrier from our phone line. The phone line is a shared ADSL line. The change goes through, and my DSL disappears. WTF?

    I call my ISP, and they talk to my DSL provider (which is not Qwest). They determine within minutes that the circuit is open at Qwest's end, and that I need to call Qwest and get them to fix it.

    Sighing heavily, I wait 45 minutes on hold to talk to Qwest DSL tech support. I describe my problem, and they ask if I have done anything to the line recently. Decent question to ask, so I tell them about dropping our LD carrier. He puts me on hold, then conferences me in with a DSL salesman. A DSL salesman! "We don't do have anything to do with someone else's DSL!" the salesman tells me. "You'll have to talk to your ISP again." They transfer me to repair, and repair says there is nothing wrong with my line. My phone line that is. "That's not the problem!" I say. "Well, it's not our problem."

    So I call my ISP back, and they say the problem is still at Qwest's end. They can't provide DSL service over an open circuit. I still need to get Qwest on the phone. They tell me to have Qwest conference me in with them. Trying to be patient, I call Qwest again...

    After another 45 minutes on hold, I get someone who is even more clueless than the previous person. I tell him my problem, and he wants to look me up in their DSL database. "But I am not a Qwest DSL customer!" I tell him. He looks me up anyway. "I can't find you in the database," he says. Really. I just told you that. Heasks what operating system I'm using. WTF? I ask him to conference in my ISP so that they can describe what's going on. Frequent repetitions of this request are met with a huge amount of resistance. "I can talk to someone here about your problem," he says. "Fine," I say, talk to someone else and put me on hold again.

    "We don't support other provider's DSL," he returns with after 5 minutes on hold. "That's not the problem!" I plea. "It's not our problem," he says, and transfers me to repair, who claims they don't have anything to do with DSL. Angry, I hang up, and call my ISP back. "Help me please!"

    A few days go by. My ISP and DSL provider escalate this help call within their own systems and get a Qwest person with a clue on the case. Within a few hours, they determine that Qwest miswired my line after we dropped our LD carrier. WTF? Within a few minutes of determining this, my DSL service is back on.

    "It's not our problem." No one at Qwest even made the slightest effort to try to delve deeper into my problem, they just wanted to get me off the phone as quickly as possible. Today's tech support is getting more and more useless. If you don't have an inside person in the system, you don't stand a chance of getting your problem fixed these days.

    </rant>

    --
    "What luck for the rulers that men do not think." Adolf Hitler
    1. Re:Bad experience with Qwest by fermion · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      The telcos were having terrible trouble getting thier DSL stuff in. A more cynical person would say they did not want some other company running services over thier copper.

      I moved apartments a few years ago. I wanted the DSL to move with me. It should not have been a big deal, nor required any change other than moving wires within my building. The telco, on the other hand, thought differently. It took them months to tell me that they could not get the circuit hooked up. They would tell me it was in the queue, or techs were working on it, or all sorts of other BS. In the end I think there was a bug in thier database, and since they never formally disconected the 'previous' service, they could not connect the 'new' service. In the end I just cancelled the service and found went to another provider. They made me wait a month to fully disconect, but i got it done. The sad thing is that if the techs were just honest and admitted that they computers were screwed up, we would have saved 3 months and i would have let them keep me as a customer.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:Bad experience with Qwest by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've got one... my DSL service was pretty spotty (as in five minutes on, ten minutes off). I tracked the problem down to Telus's DNS servers not responding rather than an actual problem with the connection. Okay, so I called Telus and told them all about it. After convincing the tech guy that a DNS server is actually something that they have, he told me that no one else was having problems so it must be my fault. Oh, and since I was running Linux, he couldn't help me.

      A week later my service was pretty much non-existent. The script I had written to send Telus an e-mail every time the DNS server went down :) couldn't even find a clear spot to send. So I called tech support again.

      First I got this fancy voice recognition system. It even had a name... Amy or something. Apparently it thinks "you've got to be kidding" means "transfer me to sales! I'd like to buy something!" Anyway, after convincing the computer that I'd like to talk to tech support, I spent TWO HOURS on hold being assured that there were some problems in Edmonton but Calgary was perfectly fine. Finally, the tech support guy told me that they were upgrading the wire centre in my area because they had more DSL accounts than it could handle. Calling back a week later gave pretty much the same result, except that on-hold times were a bit longer.

      The third time I called I got a real live person (after a two hour wait). I guess "Amy" had a nervous breakdown. This call answerer listened to my rant then told me that the wire centre story was BS and that the problem was really Telus' systems couldn't handle the load from the Windows virus going around at the time. Her DSL at home was down too, and had been for the last couple of weeks and she lived in a completely different part of the city. I still don't know who was right, but the second story seems a lot more likely. So it seems the tech support guys weren't only incompetent, they were actively lying to me. I very nearly switched to Shaw (the only other viable alternative for high speed Internet) but not being a cable subscriber their DSL fee is rather high.

    3. Re:Bad experience with Qwest by Karth · · Score: 1

      I can explain the whole problem really easily. There's two parts of qwest: Qwest the ISP, and Qwest the DSL line provider. If you are another ISP's customer, and are talking to qwest the ISP, you are screwed. They will either switch you to qwest for your ISP, or tell you to go screw yourself.

      I worked at qwest for a year and a half doing tech. Sucks, but that's what they do. you would think they'd give you the number to call qwest the line provider, but no, they want to do it the hard way.

    4. Re:Bad experience with Qwest by roca · · Score: 1

      I got a similar DSL runaround between my ISP and my phone company. My DSL mysteriously cut out, the ISP blamed the phone company, and the phone company said that we lived too far from the central office to be supported (despite the fact that the service had worked fine for months).

      Fortunately I learned of a magical solution, at least in New York: The New York Public Utilities Commission. I filed a complaint at their Web site and within a week I had a phone company repair man at my house and the DSL back on. Plus both the ISP and the phone company called me multiple times to make sure I was satisfied.

    5. Re:Bad experience with Qwest by Ancil · · Score: 1
      Just a quick note. I had, essentially, the same run-around from Pacific Bell. Twice -- same problem, different addresses. Many of these telco's will absolutely blow you off in an effort to get you to switch to "their" ISP.

      The first time, I spent almost two weeks going nowhere. Eventually, I was so mad that I filed formal complaints with both the FCC and the California Public Utilities Commission.

      You have no idea how quickly this will turn the company around. 99.99% of troublesome customers will not bother getting government regulators involved. The company will bend over backwards to make your problem go away. They want the PUC's statistics to show that they're solving all their customers' complaints, so they can continue to ignore or steal from the vast majority of their customers.

      I'm not kidding. Someone from Pacific Bell called me three times while I was out of town. She wanted to know how they could fix the problem. She was polite, for goodness sake. They flew a fucking technician up from LA, because none were available. I thought I was in the Twilight Zone.

      The important thing to do when dealing with Cable and/or Phone companies is, log every phone call you make, including time/date, whom you talked to, etc. I did this from the get-go the second time, and it was enormously helpful.

    6. Re:Bad experience with Qwest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the same problems with qwest tech support. They're not QUITE as bad as the company in the article but they're pretty much just script / cue card drones. I will say though that level 2 tech support from qwest is pretty decent and competent. Though you have to drag your ass through interminable hold times at both levels and flex your social engineering skills to get there.

    7. Re:Bad experience with Qwest by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      Thats DSL for you. It wasn't a miswire, it was the dreaded "DSL Deprovisioning" subscription... This has been known to happen to *dial up* customers, who use qwest, because someone who had that phone number *years* ago, just cancelled their dsl... which deprovisions that phone # for *any* type of service billed through qwest on that line. Go qwest, Go DSL...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
  99. Re:What's the solution? How can we take their mone by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

    The problem is that good tech support costs money, and when they see your shiny new product that costs 10-20% more on the shelf next to the one with tech support that sucks, the customer isn't thinking he'll need tech support, much less about the relative merits of yours versus theirs.

  100. Re:Oversea tech support by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Interesting
    when they keep trying to trick people into stating something that would void their warranty.

    Many moons ago, I had a laptop with a failed floppy drive. I tried calling the tech support center, explained that I had failed hardware, and it was still under warranty. The person there said she would transfer me to the right department, would I please hold. Pretty soon I was disconnected.

    Tried it again. Same result.

    So the 3rd time, I said "I have some failed hardware, I need an estimate how much it would be to fix it."

    This time I got through to a technician, and when he asked me what the problem was, I explained, and then mentioned as an aside, "Oh, and it's still under warranty!"

    Maybe they were just having problems with their phone system... makes you wonder.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  101. Tech Support Experiences by emtboy9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like so many of you out in the world of IS/IT, I too started in the 2nd layer of hell, Technical Support.

    The problem, in my experience, and highlighted in this article, is the corporate love of outsourcing. Using my own experience as example, I started some years ago working for a particular linux based company doing tech support. At the time I started, the in-house support people handled phone support for corporate customers, and web-based support for non-corporate customers (i.e. those who didnt pay for a specific contract). The phone support was handled by an outsource "Partner" who had call centers on both coasts.

    When I first started, the level of customer satisfaction for support was abyssmal. Being the "in house experts" we were drafted to monitor calls and offer critique to the outsource company. In the end, nothing we could do worked, and their treatment of our customers was so bad, we finally dropped them like a bad habit, and brought all support in-house.

    Now, flash forward a year later, and the dirty word is mentioned again. So, in a nutshell, after the team I was on turned support completely around, from a low 30% satisfaction rate to nearly 95%, they turn around and ship our jobs off to another oursource company in a different country, and we were mostly out of jobs.

    And same thing happened. Customer satisfaction fell through the floor.

    So, the moral of this story is: outsourcing something that is customer facing like Support is a Bad Thing[tm]. Like the article stated, oursource techs dont really care one way or another (or those that do care are quickly replaced with ones who dont) and the company is just out for low call times and high volume. Techs who are actually employed by the company they represent are much better workers, and provide much better support to customers. Why? because for the most part, outsource techs are just hired guns who could care less about the company whose calls they are taking, while in-house techs have a certain pride in their work, knowing that when they look good, the company looks good, stays in business, gives chance for promotion, etc etc...

    And again, thats just from my personal experience on both sides of the fence.

    --
    "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
    1. Re:Tech Support Experiences by Duke+of+Scarborough · · Score: 1

      I don't think that outsourcing is a bad thing by itself. What matters is the way you manage it.

      If you pay your contractor based on the number of phone calls guess what you'll get: large number of short phone calls, possibly repeat calls of the same customer. The call centre will not have any reason to solve problems - they'll have all reasons to hang up faster.

      So, if you want customer satisfaction, you should pay your call centre based on the number of happy customers. The problem is, it's not easy to measure and control, and you may end up paying for this as much as you've saved by outsourcing.

      What I don't understand is why the managers who outsource tech. support can't do things the right way.

    2. Re:Tech Support Experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as the tech support is outsourced in the USA

  102. Re:Oversea tech support by Alex+Reynolds · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, but you have to pay for it and do all the work.

    Let's recap this little transaction for our readers:

    [1] Dell reduces costs by getting rid of first-tier support or moving it overseas
    [2] Dell charges you or your company a fee to enroll in this program
    [3] You do all the technical support (testing, troubleshooting, etc.) thus saving Dell on per-call communication costs
    [4] Dell pockets the savings from #1, #2, and #3

    Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?

    -Alex

  103. Re:Oversea tech support by akb · · Score: 1

    What does the fact that they are Indian have to do with whether or not they read from a script? The Salon article demonstrates pretty well that the US has plenty of underinformed support drones that will do whatever they are instructed to do for money.

  104. Pretty accurate piece... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked in Apple Tech Support in Austin ten years ago, and with the exception of "evil Charles," I think I knew 90's versions of everybody mentioned in the article. They didn't press us as much to get off the phone quickly in those days, but other than that, it doesn't look like things have changed much...

  105. Dell Laptop Monitor Support & AT&T Broadba by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    DELL Now I dont't know where the support for Dell is located, but here is my experience. A laptop I bought for my dad, which he uses regularly experienced a LCD malfunction.

    How do I know it was a hardware failure? Because the picture was screwed before it even booted the OS. Nevertheless, I checked teh BIOS - then checked for windows drivers, etc. Found no Problems!

    Called Dell as this was a new computer less than 4 months old. And has been sitting in the same location the entire time. After 1 hour on the phone with tech support (mind you I explained all that I had done right away), with them having me jump through all sorts of hoops, they finally told me to send it in - NO SH!T . Why the hell should I be checking windows anyway, when the monitor is screwed b4 it ever SEES windows. What A Waste.

    Now for AT&T Broadband

    Ping on Unreal Tournament kept creeping to well over 10,000 ms (LOL), anyway I can monitor my network stats in UT and see that I had over 50% packet loss.

    Verified this by running a traceroute to random servers and web addresses.

    Always got ping timeouts for one particular router on AT&T's network.

    Called customer support, we all know what happens next (clear your cache? do you have enough ram? Have you updated windows? Power cycle the modem) In the Entire time I have been on the net, none of these have EVER been the problem.

    To make a long story short (because this is pissing me off just to write about it), THREE months later after at least six phone calls and over three hours on the phone, 3 tech visits to my home - leaning cables, measuring signal strength, etc. the problem was finally fixed.

    What was the problem you ask? THEY HAD A PROBLEM WITH ONE OF THEIR ROUTERS and this was only fixed because I had a super nice Technician visit my house, give me his PERSONAL CELL number and promise to keep on them.

    WELL DUH! I told them that 3 months earlier, geez I'm no genius, can they even have enough sense to check on something someone tells them - especially when they appear to have some computer knowledge (mind you I talked to Tier 2 support several times as well)

    I should've known that they were clueless when I asked how to view my MAC address in windows 2000. I just upgraded from 98, and didn't know much. I asked the Tech about it they said winipcfg, I said that that didn't work under 2000 (of course its ipconfig). Anyway, the Tech said he would ask his supervisor - who got on the phone and said that I didn't need it anyway. Mind you at this time AT&T broadband restricted access to cable modems by MAC addresses. I explained that I needed it for a new NIC (computer) that I had purchased, he further claimed I didn't need the MAC address, since I had allready been using the service. I told him I had a new computer (with a different NIC of Course)

    anyway, to make a long story short, I pulled a NIC out of my previous computer, accessed the internet and found my answer. Was up and running on the new NIC in under 5 minutes. Time on the phone with tech support 1 hour. NOT having to go through this sh1t ever again PRICELESS

  106. Not our call center by Blackknight · · Score: 1, Informative

    I work for a web hosting company, www.liquidweb.com, and we actually provide GOOD support.

    When you call us you're talking to a bunch of Linux geeks that actually know what we're doing. Whether it's upgrading your server's kernel or fixing Apache issues, we do it all.

  107. Worst tech support in the universe: UPS by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you ever have a problem with their desktop shipping software (that nobody on earth has any useful doc for) their first suggestion is ALWAYS to reinstall... Even if you've already done that, even if you know you accepted the defaults they specified...

    Their next step is ALWAYS to send you another CD-ROM of the software, even if you have two copies of the same version and neither gets you anywhere. This is their "get off the phone" move, because they don't offer a download or FTP site... Instead, you must ALWAYS have it shipped to you, even if it is going to cost your business a large amount of money.

    Actual Quote from Manager: "Sir, we can't afford the bandwidth to allow people to download a 650 mb CD-ROM from our web-site! We'd go broke!"
    Me: "I zipped the entire contents of the CD into a 12 mb file..."
    Manager: "The size is irrlevant, I simply cannot offer you any further support until you install from the new CD-ROM we're sending you."

    This might be my favorite Slashdot story every... There've been tech support hell-tales before, but this is an intellgent dissection of the problem. A dreadfully wondeful story.

    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:Worst tech support in the universe: UPS by BoltInMyEar · · Score: 1

      That's surprising to hear. I've called UPS a number of times for help with their WorldShip app, and it's always been a pleasant experience with a tech who knows his/her stuff. They've even stayed on the phone upwards of half an hour when multiple reboots of our 200MHz Win95 computer were necessary, and didn't once hang up or complain.

    2. Re:Worst tech support in the universe: UPS by nmos · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but just try getting BOTH the UPS and FedEx software to coexist on the same computer.

  108. wow... by Sharkus · · Score: 1

    ...reading that makes me feel proud that I'm actually able to answer peoples tech problems, regardless of how long it takes. must be something to do with working for a small company and not some massive beast. I get many people who will call, after weeks of problems and when asked why this is the first contact, they mostly say they did not want to bother us! umm, dude, we'd be out of a job if you did not call? I think they are also suprised when they get hold of a human being and not some automated system. Then they actually speak to a true tech who knows the product and not some PFY sitting in front of a database of common problems, Yeah, there are times when I "do a Ken" but it can't be that bad, would not be hear 10 years on if it was!

  109. A Very Different Environment by howlinmonkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I manage a small callcenter (5 people) who take calls for support on products we sell. This is a little different because we aren't the manufacturer, or an outsourced arm of the manufacturer. We are the endpoint of the distribution channel.

    Our goals are reduced visits by field engineers who typically bill $$$$ to be onsite to solve what is frequently a simple problem. Our calls aren't timed, and we do pretty much whatever it takes to solve the problem. Today, we talked a customer thru configuring Zone Alarm correctly so they can use our product. Sure it took over half an hour, most of our calls do. But the important point is that the customer was happy when we were done.

    I have been here 4 years now, and don't have the absolute gut level hatred of my job that I hear from many support people. I am posting this because I want you to know that not all support centers are awful dens of customer dissatisfaction. Some of us do actually do our jobs.

    1. Re:A Very Different Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my company, the IS department manages a call center of a half dozen people. The customers are other employees. So the primary goal is to solve problems so people can get back to work. While I have never had occassion to utilize their trouble-shooting skills, I have heard they are very capable. The employees actually get bonuses for getting certified (as a result, most of tech support has studied, taken, and passed certification exams).

    2. Re:A Very Different Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 questions:

      where are you located

      and

      are they hiring?

  110. Re:Oversea tech support by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    Globalization will balance everything out in the long run, but the first few hundred years are going to piss a lot of people off.

    I have to disagree. Its balancing out jobs, but that balance is not being passed on. Cars are built in Mexico, but they are not costing any less, in fact their price is still going up.

  111. We are getting *exactly* what we wanted... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... cheap rates.

    Our annual telephony costs are over 7 digits per year, easy... and getting any form of tech support, despite being a rather large account, is damned near impossible. The reason?

    Everyone wanted 10 cents per minute. Then 9. Then 8. Then 5. Then 4. If a telco doesn't offer it, everybody dumps them.

    Think they can offer any support at those rates? They can't - anyone with any experience costs too much, and is retired out. We get left with "script kiddie" tech supports, who don't understand what an T3 is, let alone know what the loss of one means. At this point, our tech support for AT&T now consists of a call to our sales rep, followed by a call to a VP - and let them deal with it, because it's the best they can do.

    So, don't bitch - we're all getting *exactly* what we asked for.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    1. Re:We are getting *exactly* what we wanted... by LookSharp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everyone wanted 10 cents per minute. Then 9. Then 8. Then 5. Then 4. If a telco doesn't offer it, everybody dumps them.

      Two questions:

      Who needs support for long-distance phone service?

      And how many "infrastructure improvements" did the Telcos make back when they were charging us 26 cents a minute?

      I pay $23 a month, plus fee, plus charge, plus tax, plus levy, plus surcharge, just to have a dialtone on a phone I use MAYBE 15 times a month. The only reason I have it and don't go VOIP is that my DSL connection is contingent upon having a dialtone through the same carrier. Which sucks.

    2. Re:We are getting *exactly* what we wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your analology could easily be applied to capitalism in general.

    3. Re:We are getting *exactly* what we wanted... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Add to that -- it's what the shareholders want, and what the CEO wants -- their cut of the pie comes first and foremost. Personally I think those create more of the shitty support problem than the ever-lowering prices model does.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:We are getting *exactly* what we wanted... by mrsteele · · Score: 1

      And how does my telephone company relate to tech support?

      Sure, I want cheap long-distance. That shouldn't have any effect on my computer repair.

      If you're say that our desire for cheap computers led to this, then you might be on to something!

    5. Re:We are getting *exactly* what we wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't - anyone with any experience costs too much, and is retired out. We get left with "script kiddie" tech supports, who don't understand what an T3 is, let alone know what the loss of one means.

      Not true. Especially in the current market we are dealing with today. There are plenty of people available that know what a T3 is. The posts to this thread reflect that vey well. The issue is the business model on which the outsourced call center is based.

      I've worked as a network/systems admin/engineer making pretty decent money. I've also recently worked in a call center answering calls for TWC. The description given of the typical call center is right on track- Average Call Time, or Average Handle Time. It's strictly about taking the most calls possible, while staying within the boundaries deemed acceptable by management. There is no real desire by the call center management to actually train the reps. They pay lip service to quality and serving the customer. They could care less about doing things better.

      It's not about the employees. It's about money. Granted, there are some pretty clueless people working the phones. There's also quite a few that are far from stupid.

  112. The disbelief is simply astonishing by subjectstorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm reading some of the responses to this article, and one thing that stands out is the large number of people who cry out "It isn't real! It isn't true!"

    I'm curious - from what well of wisdom does your disbelief spring?

    I've worked for Wal-Mart, a tech-support firm, and for my state government. I can tell you in no uncertain terms that the sort of business practices described in this article are not relegated simply to tech support; they permeate corporate culture. They are very, very real.

    Considering the almost universally crappy service at McDonald's, transfer/machine hell on automated "help" lines, incomprehensible and unethical billing practices by phone companies, undisguised hostility and ingnorance in goverment offices, chronic understaffing and undertraining in department stores, spam, and a host of other noxious and common business practices . . . well, i'm just tempted to ask you, "What the hell kind of bubble have you been living in?"

    Good service in any business arena is the exception and not the rule. If this is not the case where you live, please send me an application to your gated community. I want to move there as soon as possible.

    --
    ** Chigusaaa!!! You're the coolest girl in the WORLD!!! **
    1. Re:The disbelief is simply astonishing by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Which is why I NOTICE any company that provides good to great support, or an above average product. I tell everyone about them who want's my opinion on products. I am very up-front about my recommendations.

      For instance, people ask me about inkjet printers. I tell them Epson. Then I list the reasons.

      1. Warrenty(1 year) You do need a CC to use this - only downside I have run into.
      Their warrenty covers their own mess ups, and covers you if you buy 3rd party ink and it gumms up the printhead. Their solution? Next Day Air you a replacement printer(refurbished - sorry no more new for used, but the refurbished ones work in my experiance). You UPS back the broken printer in the same box, they pay for shipping.

      That is the reason I keep using Epson printers. Oh, the printers are nice - and $130 for an inkjet isn't bad. But it's the knowledge that when the inkjet messes up I can get it fixed that keeps me coming back. I've used HP, Cannon, Lexmark, Olivetti and they all eventually have problems. The ink cloggs is the most common, but sometimes the printhead dies. So I like knowing I will at least get a year or more out of an inkjet. Heck, my Lexmark lasted 3 months and died(well $10 at office max, what did I expect?)

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    2. Re:The disbelief is simply astonishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm reading some of the responses to this article, and one thing that stands out is the large number of people who cry out "It isn't real! It isn't true!"
      That's what you get for reading at a -1 threshold: trolls, trolls, and more trolls.

      BTW, how do you know they "cry out"? Can you actually hear them? I don't hear anybody crying, but my ears are not what they used to be.

    3. Re:The disbelief is simply astonishing by danila · · Score: 1

      If this is not the case where you live, please send me an application to your gated community.

      Finland, may be? Other than a few sucky teachers, everybody was simply excellent. Hotel stuff, waiters, sales clerks, register clerks, administrative clerks, bus drivers, taxi drivers, fast-food employees, doctors, nurses, post-office clerks, everyone. And I mean it. People seemed to love you just for coming to their store/office/hospital/bank/etc. And all that in great English. Yes, the country is psomewhat]expensive and the taxes are [relatively] high, but ultimately it's the quality of life that matters, not how much you have in your bank account.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    4. Re:The disbelief is simply astonishing by lubricated · · Score: 1

      inkjets are all pieces of crap a good laser is the way to go. If you want color go to kinko's and use their color laser for the few times you really need it. Inkjets are a complete waste of plastic.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    5. Re:The disbelief is simply astonishing by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      I still think the whole "McDonald's/fast food has crappy service" thing is largely self-inflicted (by the customers). I work at one. Granted, not every McDonald's employee is thrilled to be there 100% of the time, but still...

      A woman dropped something, napkin/straw/ketchup packet/whatever, on the floor. One of our employees, in street clothes at the time, went to pick it up for her. She stopped the employee, saying, "No dear, that's what they're here for."

      I can't tell you how many times people have come in and tried to order things from the "99 cent" menu. (McDonald's, BTW, is the one with the Dollar Menu.) Or tried to order a Whopper. Seriously, if you're going to a restaurant, make sure you know which one you're in.

      Ever seen a Playplace in the middle of lunch on the weekends? Odds are it's a mess. You know what though? If you show up with your kids, and you proceed to completely trash the table you're at as well as the floor within a 3-foot radius, are you going to clean it up? Do you tell your children to maybe not throw food on the floor? Of course not. You look around and think, "Gee, this place is a dump."

      And that doesn't even count the customers who are just out and out stupid. Some old man came in and thought the lobby was completely trashed. Just beyond belief, the worst kept restaurant he'd ever seen. As I recall, there was a straw wrapper on the floor. One. In the whole lobby.

      Contrast this with the guy who decided to complain to a manager that someone was sweeping the floor near where he was eating. He thought this was incredibly unsanitary, since it kicked up dust which must somehow have landed on his food, and suggested that we not clean the store while it is open! I'm waiting for him and the other guy to meet somewhere sometime so they can have at each other.

      Oh, and let's not forget the people who think McDonald's has so much money that they're somehow entitled to something extra. And I'm not even talking about the teenagers who steal straw dispensers or deface the washrooms. I'm talking about adults. In one case, one came in (in spanking clean clothes, mind you) and announced quite loudly in front of a line of customers in lobby that he had just gone through the drive-thru and had food dumped all over him. There was one fatal flaw in his plan: the store has no drive-thru.

      Bloody hell, if you want to be waited on hand and foot, in a place the customers treat like someone else's house, go to a sit down restaurant and spend 45-90 minutes and $25-40 on the two of you.

      If you want to go somewhere where you can trash the place and treat the employees like they're high-school dropouts (when in fact they're 16 and still in school), damned to a life of 50 cents an hour over minimum wage, by all means, go to a McDonalds. You'll be out of there in 20 minutes at a cost of $10-12.

  113. And you were worried about India? by dave420-2 · · Score: 1
    I mean, seriously. How anyone can have a single argument against the quality of Indian tech support when this goes on in the US?

    I can't wait for more tech support to be farmed out to teams who actually help, as opposed to those who say they do, but are watching their call log.

  114. Actually the article isnt going far enough by Bruha · · Score: 1

    A company I wont mention has made a system that can read what you say in several languages then present to the tech support person what is basically compared to a ranked google search with percentages of revelance attached to each subject. The tech support person is supposed to read the highest ranked one verbatim to the customer. Of course "We dont support that" probably comes 50 times more than a real answer.

    This is the reason I dont buy my computers I build them.. I teach those around me who I build computers for the basics of adding and removing stuff if needed and how usb and the connector color coding works. They're largely on their own past that but I do encourage them to grab a few dummies books if it's too hard.

    Sadly my mother is too damn lazy to even read one she just calls me. Maybe I should say "I dont support that"

    hmmmm

  115. Same experience here by grungeman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had problem with my office jet some months ago. The printer gave an error saying that the cardridge was not inserted correctly. So I bought a new cardridge, but the same error occured. I was really pissed, because the OfficeJet had just received a fax but could not print it, so I even could not switch it off without losing the fax. When I called HP tech support, they not only solved my problem within minutes (wash the cardridge with water and soap and insert it again), but a few days later I found a new cardridge in my mail. Oh, and I had a professional tech support from HP that helped me setting up an Itanium machine. That support was superb.

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
  116. Bad article, but here's the jist... by ValourX · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A paid subscription site, eh? Information should always be free, especially if it's useful. In this instance I question the usefulness of this article because it doesn't offer a better solution. I'm glad I didn't pay for this article. I looked at some of the other Salon articles that were recommended at the end, and they were so rife with over-descriptive, drippy purple prose that it made my teeth hurt. This is really bad writing by people who think that they're really good writers. Bad writing affects me physically; I will never return to salon.com and I'm sure it's no skin off their nose. But back to the topic... honestly, isn't it obvious that "free" phone support is useless? This is nothing new; it's been this way since the dawn of tech support. Even some of the paid support is useless unless you're on a premium support contract with someone big like IBM, Sun, or HP. In those instances you end up with skilled technicans who know what they're doing and in appropriate circumstances have access to service manuals and other important tools that you can't get to otherwise. For home users, nothing beats community support. All of us here should know that already, and we should be passing this knowledge (along with links to good forums and lists) to those who don't know. -Jem

    1. Re:Bad article, but here's the jist... by decepty · · Score: 1
      For home users, nothing beats community support. All of us here should know that already, and we should be passing this knowledge (along with links to good forums and lists) to those who don't know
      I have a presonal relationship with my Tech Support guy... His name is Mr. Google. He answers all my questions really well, and my friend's questions too! Plus, he does it all without complaining... Seriously, why outsource your help desk people to India when Mr. Google works for free?
      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
  117. why a drug screening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd rather hired a skilled pot smoking tech than a clean one with no tech skills...

    Pot smoking tech: "Whoa dude, that computer problem is totally bogusss!"

    No skill clean tech: "What's a computer?"

  118. Tech support sucks by stryc9 · · Score: 1
    I was a tech support rep for a large canadian ISP. Although we actually worked for the ISP (not outsourced) the atmosphere was about the same. The only difference was that they not only liked those that got off the phone fast, they liked the polite, happy, more customer service types the best. In fact, as I was leaving they lowered the pay rate of the techies and hired some of the customer service reps to work in the tech department. They would much rather like the customer to hang up happy (and fast) than have a tech that actually knew what he/she was doing. And you wonder why everyone bitches about techies?

    Another thing that really hit home with me was the second tier support positions. These people are supposed to be knowledgeable beyond that of the average tier 1 techie... but they are not.

    I hate inexperienced techs... I hate damn script readers... but companies love them because polite people who can read a script are cheaper by a large margin than actually tech-enabled geeks.

    In regards to the dell comments... I have usually been able to bear with the accent problems and that, that is until my last dealings with them. I had a workstation with something wrong with the video card. The machine had hung, the user reset the tower and after that there was lines all over the screen during post and when hitting F8 to select safe mode (the only way windows would start) the text would all be wrong... like the wrong letters here and there. Since this was happening BEFORE windows loaded it was IMPOSSIBLE that this had ANYTHING to do with video drivers. Try explaining THAT to a script reading idiot across a language barrier!! Two calls and two hours later I finally got them to get me a new damn video card.

    --
    www.madeofwinandawesome.com
  119. Amusing but ultimatly... by yoshi_mon · · Score: 3, Informative

    A sensasional artical than it is factual. Now I don't doubt that many of the issues raised in call centers ring true, been there done that, there are a few things that I personally have seen that need to be taken into consideration.

    First of all, it's average call time. While most of my experiance has to do with ISP support there are still a lot of parallels. Say you get a 30 min call, then a 5 min call, then a 10 min call. Right there your at 15 mins ACT. Not great but if your trying to actually solve problems rather than "punt" or "give" the call away it's a respectable ACT to have. Now how do you know that 15 mins is a respectable call time if it's 3 mins over your 12 min limit? Next point...

    Any good call center has peer review and then the big client review. (I don't touch on client review here but suffice to say there are often frantic scrambles down to the "floor" from the boardroom to tell tech X that he better do a good job on this call, time be dammed!) Peer review is typically a weekly thing that every manager has to submit to their "Account Manger" every week. Plug into the call queue and listen though a call. Not the most fun but it really does need to be done to ensure that people have a clue what they are talking about. (This is assuming you as the manager actually have a clue, but I digress.) Many times this job is left to the managers lackys, sometimes called "Team Leads", but the important thing is that it gets done by someone who has a good understanding of what to listen for in a call. You then can use this data with the statistics on call times and such to get a real picture of how a tech is dealing with calls. Only looking at the #'s leads to...

    The drive to get as many calls as humanly possable, problem solving be dammed. And yeah, it's there and will be until the clients (The people who outsource their support needs.) realize that paying by call instead of "resolutions" is a truely asinine way of doing things. However, since many companys have yet to realize this you will have call centers gouging at the trough of calls/money. So often what is done by clever managers is to strike a balance of techs who do both, those "turn and burn" calls and those who actually try to fix problems. It is far from a perfect solution as those who don't fix anything tend to leave the customers in a very upset state for those that do actually try and fix things, or even worse the punters manage to make the problem worse before ending the call. But it's a way to actually keep the gravy train running while still being able to keep most of the angry customers from writing scathing letters to the powers that might actually cancel your contract.

    I could go on but I think everyone should get the idea by now. Hopefully one of these days the people who outsource their support will get a clue and use that magic word resolution rather than trying to just look at #'s but for right now it's at best a frog in the blender mix of both kinda deal.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    1. Re:Amusing but ultimatly... by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      What your missing here is that this article is about a outsourced call center. They really do (typically) get paid by the call, and not by the quality of the service they provide.

      That's the whole problem with this particular shop. They use average call time as the be-all-end-all statistic because it's 1:1 with the amount of money they make as a call center. If you spend 30 minutes on ANY call, your in trouble because that's time that could have been spent completeing 2 or even 3 additional calls. It's not really average call time they are interested in, but customer thoroughput.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    2. Re:Amusing but ultimatly... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      A sensasional artical than it is factual

      I'd like to know what experience you back this claim up with. This article pretty much sums up my 2 year experience at Stream International word for word. Except we called it AHT (average handle time) - which was talk time plus wrap. In my experience to get the low 14-13 minute calls you can have maybe one or two long calls that entire day...

      I had two breaks of 15 minutes each - the state only requires 10 minutes each - the reason why I know this is because Stream would send out emails

      Also - at Stream if you went over the required AHT on an individual call someone would drop by your desk to find out what was going on.

      And for client review there's a trick they use for that too - the first year Stream would always do the best they could (not worry about aht, solve problems get customer satisfaction up) then they move in a SDM (service delivery manager) who is a closer and gets the results talked about in this article. Once a contract is locked into a company like Stream its kinda hard to move. So they keep the metrics just good enough to justify leaving things the way they are.

      But... almost every contract I saw come and go at Stream came or went to one of our competitors. Some contracts I had heard have been to more than one outsourcer too...

    3. Re:Amusing but ultimatly... by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Well, since I posted with my real UID rather than as an AC I'm a bit loath to say who my actual employer was. (Friggen NDA and all that.)

      However, without directly giving it away I can say that they are one of the big boys when it comes to call center outsourcing. Handeling contracts from such companys as: SBC, Dell, Gateway, Palm, and AT&T just to name a few.

      And also in response to both yourself and the other person who replied to me, don't be under the impression that I feel that call center work is very good. I've witnessed the "Kens" of the call call callcenter. Witnessed shameless political moveups from being on the floor, to TL, to Level 2 tech's (IE Mentors from the artical), to actual managment.

      My personal fav guy who me and my friends would always talk about was John. (Name changed to protect the guilty.) John would, to use my vernacular, turn and burn calls with such shameless efficiency that his ACT was anywhere between 2-3 mins during any given week. He had this method, and you really almost had to hear it to believe it, of turning any problem around such that it made the caller just want to get off the phone with him because they just knew he was not going to do anything. When I was made TL (One of the guys who "drops by" your cube if your call goes over 10 mins, yeah heh.) I would always shudder when I had to peer review him. His scores where dreadful but nobody cared since he was part of the mix that made money. Never mind that if you actually wanted to solve someones problem and their case # reflected that John had been there they were likely to be rather irate after his ministrations but oh well.

      Anyway, good points as well all around I think in this thread. I think it all goes back to the actual account contract specs as to what level of service you will see in a call center. Co's that actually seemed to care seeming made the metrics reasonable and backed it up with good traning. Others, and I'm guessing they truely just didn't care if their customers got any real support at all; which is scary, might just have well put the calls on hold and then had someone tell them, "Sorry! Your screwed, hahaha! "

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  120. Re:Sounds like someone has a case of the Mondays. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    It was on Comedy Central the other day, hell it's always on.. I remember noticing, watching the "Jump to Conclusions" scene that the company was spelled "Inotech" on his ID badge..

    It could have very well been an in-joke, that the company name is spelled different in different scenes.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  121. And the solution is..... by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    I support about 500 boxes: a lot to some, few to others, it's all relative. Most of them are Dells. Tech support from Dell varies from excellent to non-existant; it just depends. I've had support orders submitted that never ever got a reply (for a dead system) even though I have the email confirmations to prove they were submitted (That's happened with orders as well.) On the other hand, I've had a new power supply on my desk within a day. I have a test bench and I usually know precisely what is wrong before I contact them, but many times I have to fight them: a blown hard drive and I have to go thru all these diags.

    Given all these issues we've grown to simply not expect any competent tech support. PCs are a commodity item. We buy them dozens at a time. If one breaks, it's far easier to replace it and use the broken one for parts. I don't care if it is under warranty. It is FASTER and LESS EXPENSIVE to just replace it.

    Yes, that has implications for the land fill. I appreciate that issue. But when MTBF menas sometime TODAY, I simply cannot afford to believe tech support even exists.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  122. THE ANSWER GROUP SUCKS FAT COCK by addaboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to work there. it is the worst of all employers. the article is dead on and I'm also convinced that they're talking abot TAG. I worked there myself for three months. It is the shittiest company in the world.

  123. Re:Nothing new here... BULL*$@# ! by mnmlst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you put an idiot with a script in front of them on the phone, they may piss off people, but they are less likely to do any real damage.

    I actually read the article and found it positively HORRIFYING. Since I am around sysadmins all the time, I forget what it's like to be some gullible consumer running Windows XP Home Edition.

    How about some Hippocratic Oath action here? You know, "First, do no harm." The Formatters who fail to fully disclose that consumers are going to lose their family's digital photo albums, video clips of newborns, and contact information for friends and family worldwide are lacking in redeeming human value. If you are a Formatter, please find a new line of work- TODAY.

    Call ME gullible, but given our reasonably wide-open markets for building, selling, and supporting PC's, I would think the companies using these "Support Centers" will suffer for their callous disregard for their customers. What's worse is that these practices end up staining all of us in Information Technology as uncaring a-holes. In the future, those PC customers will move on to technologies that they can handle on their own. Hell, they might just buy Apples or some extremely dumbed-down desktop Linux. Just try explaining where "Desktop" is located in Windows Explorer to the average consumer if you think Windows is "simple and intuitive". And the Desktop is the first thing seen after logon!

    --
    In principio erat Verbum.
  124. You get what you pay for. by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    People complain about tech support, but aren't willing to pay for it.

    The company I work for has excellent, and I mean excellent, tech support.

    But it thousands of dollars per year.

    How good tech support do you expect, when you buy a $399 computer or a $29 software package.

  125. Apple's Tech Support by thenextpresident · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is interesting, as this is the opposite of Apple's tech support. My girl friend had a problem with bad memory in her new eMac, causing the screen to "snap", or flicker. Replacing the RAM did the trick.

    However, she was very happy with the technical support people who she said were very helpful, and rather smart. She's very much into computers, and so knows bad tech support when she hears it (she introduced me to Linux, for example), and was very much pleased with Apple's tech support.

    She tells me she almost enjoyed the fact that she got to call tech support, made her feel so much better about getting a Mac.

    --
    Jason Lotito
    1. Re:Apple's Tech Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently had to phone Apple's support line regarding manufacturing problems with a new iBook G4. I was generally impressed with the organisation of the service and the people I talked to, and I got satisfaction pretty quickly, though it took some convincing for some aspects.

      Now, I must point out that I shouldn't have had to call - I paid a bunch of money for a machine that was in crappy shape - bad case, bad components, nearly everything had to be replaced and it's still not as good as it should be. Build quality has dropped drastically on these things compared to the iBook G3s (notwithstanding motherboard and video cable problems on some of those).

      But the tech support was good, and I'd encourage anyone with a recent Mac that doesn't seem to be up to snuff (particularly wrt to the case parts) to call and talk to Apple about it. I put it off because I was dreading the call, and it turned out to be just fine.

  126. Please. 50% truth, 50% Bullshit. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    This makes sense if you think about it. If you install some sort of aftermarket sound card and fry your motherboard, we can hardly be held responsible for that.

    Really? How?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Please. 50% truth, 50% Bullshit. by Karth · · Score: 1

      Because in my 7 years of doing tech, I can tell you that ~15% of the generic home users who buy a new sound card go home, pop open the case, and jam the card in with the machine turned on. Opps. Not the manufacturer's fault.

      another ~10% don't plug it all the way in, and then expect you to fix it for them.

      Another ~5% snap some component off the motherboard, or break the motherboard while jamming the card in. They expect you to replace the board for free.

      How are ANY of these scenarios the fault of the people who made the computer?

    2. Re:Please. 50% truth, 50% Bullshit. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      I don't buy it. Machine on or off. And snapping parts off the mother board? Are we talking about an eMachine? Is your name Ken?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:Please. 50% truth, 50% Bullshit. by Karth · · Score: 1

      My name is Nate. What do you do that you haven't dealt with this crap? are you an execeptionally smart end user? an exceptionally lucky tech?

      Remember, tech support only hears about stuff when it goes wrong, so my perception of end users is more than a little tainted, but this stuff does happen, and people like my grandmother, my mom, my dad, and my aunts and uncles do it, just like the rest of the population.

      You don't seriously think they understand how delicate some of the components are on a motherboard? If the box says you can install it in 15 minutes, that must mean you can open the box and slap it in any which way. That's how some people (just enough to cause a lot of calls) think about this stuff.

  127. Plagarist by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You ripped me off. Word for word.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=87052&cid=75 59 755

    Plagarist. I don't mind being copied, translated and quoted, but you passed this off as your own, and that's plagarism. Have you ripped off anything else I've written?

    1. Re:Plagarist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no

    2. Re:Plagarist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone get "We can't find a comment with that ID (7559) in this discussion (87052).", remember to cut out the space.

    3. Re:Plagarist by scumbucketisaplagiar · · Score: 1

      Here are some more examples:

      original copy
      original copy

      Doesn't look like he's got anything personal against you

  128. Tech Support Nightmare Site for Compaq Computers by netglen · · Score: 1
    Here is a backlash anti-Compaq website showing the shortfalls of Compaq's Tech Support. There are several really good posted articles from technicians that had to support Tier-1 Compaq calls. If you have the time it worth browsing through some of the stories.

    Compaqsucks.com : Compaqs Really Suck!

    Here is a example posting of the tech support hell from a Compaq tech support tech.

    Tech from Site 38
    I'm a Compaq technician; not really I work for Sykes Corp., which contracts to Compaq. Most customers don't understand why they get the support they get. Most techs want to help out but the restrictions that Compaq imposes stops us from helping.

    One restriction that Compaq imposes is a time limit. You may call and ask if we have a time limit and we'll answer "no, we don't have a time limit", as we are required to say. When I first started out, we had twelve to fifteen minutes to solve your problem, which can be done if it's a simple question. (I.e. how much RAM can I put in the machine) Then about four months later the time length moved again to ten through twelve minutes to solve and if you had to rebooted the system three times then your times up. Well, guess what... the time limits have moved again. Currently the limit is from six to ten minutes to solve your problem. Currently the only way to get complex machine corrected is to QR the machine whether it needs it or not. Wait... Hold on a bit... I know what you're going to say and I AGREE WITH YOU. A lot of problems can be fixed without doing the QR..... Here's the catch 22 for us the techs.... If we don't get you off the phone in the current time limit when we will be written up or later fired if it keeps happening (PERIOD). For an incentive, we the techs get paid more money if we get you off the phones faster. Yes this is the first time that I've gone to work for a company to deceive people about Compaq's problems.

    Another restriction that Compaq imposes takes place in giving support to the customer. According to Compaq, we are under no condition to tell people about the major problems with different systems. If you read the tech's (from site 58) information when you could see what I'm talking about. Also if you get a computer that will not work and it's out of the box or about every component has been replaced, we can not tell you to take it back even if we thinks it's a Lemon. If we tell you the customer to take it back to the store and Compaq is monitoring the call they will call Sykes and tell Sykes to remove that tech from their employment. So what do you think Sykes will do... fire an honest tech or jeopardize losing the contract? So what do we have to say is that we (Compaq) will get the computer fixed. Now for the fun part is that out of box monitor or printer not working we can replace it...But what we can't tell you is that it will be replaced with a refurbished component...Yes someone old rebuild piece of equipment in exchange for your new monitor or printer. I have finally got it all figured out. We are not here for customer support but for customer management... Do you remember during the Gulf war when all the American people in Iraq were forced to stay at military site so that we wouldn't bomb those sites? Well Compaq must have thought it was a great idea because they're using the same tactics. And we the techs are there to protect from any customer from getting to them but instead of oil or weapons we're protecting Compaq's money. We the tech are the human wall set up by Compaq.

    Not only do we have to deal with Compaq but we have to deal with Sykes too. Some of the internal operations disable us from help you. After our initial training, we start receiving less and less training. All of the software that comes with the computer old and new, we have had no training unless we have the program a home or check it out after hours. Many techs have requested formal training on a program that people uses a lot but all requests for trainin

  129. One word... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Seeing Charles' name pop up on your phone will make your heart sink. If you try to explain your problem, "I have a customer whose modem is..."

    He'll interrupt with, "Tell them we can't support the system unless it's in its original condition."

    Compaq.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:One word... by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Hehehe. The article also talks about the "Not working? Format and reinstall" kind of support. A Compaq laptop a relative had didn't even come with a Windows CD, just a quick restore CD that wiped everything. I can easily imagine their support recommending its use in various interesting flavors - if the only way to reinstall anything is to wipe out everything and restore disk image from CD.

      (Win98 started to chomp mud on that laptop a year later. Was extremely hesitant to even think of trying their support if the hardware and software was that crappy. Ended up renouncing Microsoft's EULA and reinstalling Win98SE from my own CD. Apparently not had a single major problem after that.)

      (And speaking of tech support, I hope I will never ever need to reinstall Windows for any of the relatives. =)

  130. Why bother? by Koryu · · Score: 1

    Before I buy something either expensive and/or potentially problematic (video capture hardware used to be a very good example), I check out the web site of the company in question. The main thing I look for is the support pages. I'm looking for a public forum. 1. It gives me a hint at potential problems I might face if I buy this product. 2. Any problems I (might) come across often already have a solution that someone else figured out. If that solution is to return the product and buy similar product X, I know where to move on. If the solution is a configuration tweak or a driver download, then I might just brave it anyway. Call center? What's that?

  131. Easy solution for quality control of tech support by toonrmeusa · · Score: 1

    At the end of the call, it clicks you over to a phone bank at the contracting company (Dell or whatever). "On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being abysmal and 5 being great, please rate your experience with this call." Beep! "Thank you. Your rating has been recorded." Along with the time of the call, and the call center employee number. The computer at the phone bank records the time of the call and the rating, and using some formula specified in the contract, the amount paid to the contractor is calculated.

    --
    Toon toon! Black and white army!
  132. Man that sounds just like Scream International by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    errr I mean Stream. Well on second thought maybe I don't. Gives me the screaming mimi's just thinking about it.

  133. Clean water performs better by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 5, Funny

    Water Technologies from GE

    Helping conserve one of our most precious natural resources.

    See what's possible

    There. Was that so painful? If you're going to plagerize the article, you might as well plagerize the ad too!

    --
    Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
  134. Re:Dell Laptop Monitor Support & AT&T Broa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now for AT&T Broadband

    One of the main reasons I've stayed with Speakeasy is that they have excellent support and uptime. Course it costs a lot more -- $80 for 4 dedicated IPs over a covad line versus the $20-30 for cable or Qwest's DSL.

    I think the difference is that they can let the morons (not saying that you are) go to the cable and Qwest DSL and they can handle the more professional user. Thus they can dedicate resources to solving real problems versus answering calls about how to close the cup holder.

    Plus the whole idea of broadband internet access where one person could screw up your neighborhood's connection is a little frightening.

  135. accents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >> that the lack of a familiar accent to american consumers is bring them a bad name.

    About accents... it occurs to me that some people probably respond poorly to indian accents on the tech-support line for one or more of these three reasons:

    1)They are racist.
    2)They hear a non-american answer the phone and think that an outsourced employee is less able than a non-outsourced one.
    3)They hear a non-american answer the phone and think of the negative economic connotations associated with outsourcing.


    Any way you lose, except on payday.


    It reminds me of the culture at a HelpDesk I worked at. Many people who called up were rude, and although some were just naturally jerks, more than a few seemed to think that all helpdesk people are Bastard Operator-types who have bloated egos and no social skills or desire to help anyone.


    I have no point. Not even on top of my head.

    1. Re:accents by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      No, it's just that when I do business in America, I find it entirely appropriate to staff the phone lines with people fluent in the majority language, English. Good luck getting decent Spanish or French language support if you live in the U.S. I know the company I did support for had French, German, Italian and Spanish as well as english on one floor. Our Chinese speakers had good enough english skills that our customers never had issues communicating with them, nor with our Indian team members. Good luck saying that about Microsoft or Dell.

      The problem with supporting customers in America is one of languages. Having one person who can barely understand the language talking to another person who can barely understand the language is the height of stupidity service-wise, but apparently perfect for the bottom-line.

      God, I love this country.

      As to your "Bastard Operator" point, I agree, many of my customers had this very antagonistic attitude coming in, bitching and moaning... "Yup, yup, yup. I understand your pain. Now why don't you slow down, tell me exactly what is going wrong, and we'll get your sorted out split-time..." seemed to calm even the worst of them down.

      Even the "I want to talk to your manager types"...
      "Well what's that gonna do, you get to bitch and moan at him, while I'm stuck here with no details unable to work on your problem..." types. Then again, I actually had a clue about the product I was working on (not to imply that you didn't...)

      In the end, every customer wants to be treated as a paying customer, the guys who writes your paycheck, even if it's only a fraction of a penny. Give them the time they deserve, and they'll be your customer for life. Brand loyalty is dead in America simply because the corps have lost sight of this.

      Good day!

    2. Re:accents by ALpaca2500 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      About accents... it occurs to me that some people probably respond poorly to indian accents on the tech-support line for one or more of these three reasons:

      1)They are racist.
      2)They hear a non-american answer the phone and think that an outsourced employee is less able than a non-outsourced one.
      3)They hear a non-american answer the phone and think of the negative economic connotations associated with outsourcing.

      4) I can't understand a goddamn word they're saying.

      doesnt have anything to do with race or expertise. but if i can't understand what they say, how can they help me?

    3. Re:accents by SacredNaCl · · Score: 1

      About accents... it occurs to me that some people probably respond poorly to indian accents on the tech-support line for one or more of these three reasons:

      1)They are racist.
      2)They hear a non-american answer the phone and think that an outsourced employee is less able than a non-outsourced one.
      3)They hear a non-american answer the phone and think of the negative economic connotations associated with outsourcing.

      4) I can't understand a goddamn word they're saying.


      I had a problem getting DSL hooked up with the major telco here, no line sync, hardware problem on telcos end... I called repair & support, they transferred me to India via VoIP. It's not that the guy on the other end was clueless, he may or may not have been, but I had to repeat everything to him 4 times, he had to repeat everything to me 3-4 times just to be able to make out anything. Now it's hard enough to understand some of these accents, but when it's done in a highly compressed format on top of it that is choppy -- and I know that is a bottom line decision -- it's impossible.

      The impression this left with me was highly negative. My opinion of the local telco is still in the dumps. My impression of Indian tech support is right up there with Compaq. My impression of VoIP's abilities is now pretty low as well. They had one shot to make that first impression a good one and they blew it.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  136. Freelance tech support by mandie · · Score: 1

    As companies functioning on small margins seem unwilling to pay for competent tech support, the trick seems to be convincing customers to do it on their own. The best plan I can see is for several dozen of us to band together, become a Dell/HP/etc. certified shop so we can dispense parts and take calls at an hourly (quarter-hourly?) rate. If we charge about $60/hr, the people with simple questions only get stuck for $15, while those requiring the time pay more.

    The small matter of getting consumers to pay for independent support or buy support contracts, on the other hand... I got nothin.

    --
    Grüß Gott aus Bayern!
  137. Re:Tech Support Nightmare Site for Compaq Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, I don't know if the info here relates to home user support or corporate support but... I've been working with Compaq hardware for over 10 years (in the corporate workplace) I would rank Compaq as among the top 3 companies for support. I call an 800 number and usually get a warm body with actual in depth knowledge of the hardware i am calling about. I've always been impressed with them. HP on the hand, totally blows. again, in talking about corp. support, not end user.

  138. Well said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe your shorts are too tight.

  139. Orwellian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like, how? I was expecting this to be about spyware. This isn't Orwellian; it's just sad.

  140. Tech Support? We don't need no steenkeen... by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Funny
    I used to do tech support back in the day when it wasn't off-shored and quality mattered quite a bit. I worked for a Major Graphics Software Company, (not MS or Adobe) and it was a trip.

    I disliked that job. I didn't hate it, like the Two Guys stint I wrote about last month, but it was not a great experience.

    The management was bumbling and just on the edge of mean - always sitting on us to get times down. But, it was Back In The Day, so I had GREAT stock options, so I put up with it for THREE YEARS.

    The worst part were the customers, for me. Some were nice, and I liked them, but some were complete IDIOTS.

    Here's a few conversations I remember:

    Me: So, you're getting a what error?
    Caller: Ah got me a tap negative ONE error, and then nuthin happens.
    Me: Type one? Sounds like it's a problem with your extensions - some kind of conflict.
    Caller: Oh? Wull, lemme check that out raaaht now...
    (The sound of the reciever clattering on the table and footsteps across a wooden floor. The sound of furniture moving. The sound of more furniture moving. Fottsteps coming back tothe phone)
    Caller: Why it CAIN'T be an extensheeyuns problem.
    Me: Really? How do you figure?
    Caller: Wull, ever-thang's plugged in JES' FINE!!!

    Another fine user of our product:

    Caller: Hi! My name's JIM! Who're YOU?
    Me: Ralph. How can I help you Jim?
    Caller: Well, my (program) won't fucking WORK! (puffs from a cigarette)
    Me: Bummer. You're using it for what purpose there Jim?
    Caller: I'm the webmaster of the Bluebird Trailer Court. I'm tryin to set up a way that we call all get onto the web and order supplies for our, ummm, homes without any kind of time wastin' - so like if someone runs out of Propane, they just get on the web and bingo: everything is done all automatic like.
    Me: That's a pretty sophisticated job, Jim.
    Caller: DAMN FUCKIN STRAIGHT! AND YOUR GODDAMN SOFTWARE AIN'T FUCKIN' WORKIN! (swills something from a bottle, and smokes some more.)
    Me: I understand Jim, and I'm here to help you. Where you located? What's your serial number? (We do the business part of the call) Wow. Texas? You must be hot there this time of year.
    Jim: It ain't the heat, it's the damn humidity (slap of skin. Truck roars by... I'm getting the impression he's sitting there crushing mosquitoes, drinking whiskey -his speech is beginning to slur as he gets louder and louder; in his underwear - because it's an oven where he is, and lives in the trailer next to the Highway - judging by all the traffic noise. A vision of HELL - a trailer park in southern Texas...)
    and DAMN it's humid here today!
    Me: Bummer Jim. so, let's see ... how does it not work?
    Jim: It doesn't do what I want it to.
    Me: Are you in front of it now?
    Jim: YEP! AND IT'S DOING IT AGAIN!!!!
    Me: What? I thought it didn't work...
    Jim: It works - IT JUST DON'T WORK RIGHT! DAMMIT! (swills more booze smokes more cigarette...)
    Me: OK OK - quit the app and do EXACTLY as I tell you...

    Of course, he didn't and all he did was get completely shitfaced drunk and go through a pack of Merits. Eventually he started hitting his computer. At that point, I couldn't stop stifling my laughter, and put him on hold. I conference called him in with another tech, because Jim was a LOSER beyond loser. We were both hitting the mute button because we were laughing hysterically at this nincompoop. It devolved to something like this:

    Jim: SEE? THERE!!! IT DID IT AGAIN! I'm tellin ya this fucking thing is CURSED!!!!
    Me: I'm sorry Jim, I didn't see anything - we're on the telephone. Tell me what you saw.
    Jim: OH RIGHT! uuuuh Well, IT' DIDN'T WORK AGAIN! DAMMIT! And (hits computer) this damned Compaq is a piece of CRAP. I friggin HATE this thing.
    Me: I'm not sure it's the computer, and while I know you're using a very old PC, we do make the same software for Macintosh, if you do cross over to Mac. So either way, you can use this program and not lose your work.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  141. geek support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >> And we wonder why computer illiterate people always come to directly to the geek in their life for help whenever something goes wrong.

    I don't find that surprising at all. People want things to be easy, and what's easier than having someone smart do it for you?

    What surprises me is that we still have not formed a geeky union for the purpose of denying the PHBs and cheerleaders our *ahem* services until we get the *ahem* services that we desire.

    1. Re:geek support by cableshaft · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but before I fix a computer for any PHBs or cheerleaders, I always make certain the PHB gives me a good rimjob and the cheerleader gives me some juicy stock tips beforehand.

      --
      Creator of the popular web game Proximity
  142. IBM's Secret Long-term Business Plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Manufacture, Sell, And Service Mainframes At Nice Fat Profit

    2) Invent Killer Micros

    3) Watch Killer Micros Cluster Up And Kill Other Mainframe Manufacturers

    4) Watch Killer Micros Get Dirt Cheap And Kill Killer Micro Manufacturers

    5) Manufacture, Sell, And Service Mainframes^W Consolidated Enterprise Servers At Nice Fat Profit

  143. Who makes up these names? by Sandor+at+the+Zoo · · Score: 1
    At the beginning of the article:

    Editor's note: All names have been changed.

    Later in the article:

    Loni is a great guy.

    Loni?

    Who makes up these names? Couldn't they at least come up with a gender-matching name? Did Salon outsource the picking of names to some country where it's unclear that "Loni" is a girl's name?

    1. Re:Who makes up these names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Orwell what? It's grammatical affirmative action gone stupidly awry. All the "great guys" in the story can't be men. It's Salon.

  144. Re:Oversea tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And actually, our hardware support is all Dell certified, and we have a parts for most recent GX models in stock. But we've got almost 10,000 systems, and a lot of smaller companies don't have this luxury. I can see a torrent of companies with even a couple of hundred machines leaving if they had to deal with this all the time.

  145. That's because we keep undercutting each other. by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    While some of us demand the whole home run for our services, others will settle for a damn smile and five minutes of female company.

    Assholes, aren't they?

  146. Homestar Runner... by emilng · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  147. Re:Nothing new here... BULL*$@# ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you are a Formatter, please find a new line of work- TODAY.

    You obviously have never called tech support. I refuse, to this day, to call Windows tech support lines for anything. That's because, in the early days of Windows (3.1 to win95) every damned problem came down to re-installing Windows. I hear it's better now but I'm not gonna try it.

    Say what you will, I think this entire idiotic non-support tech support model, along with its casual contempt for the customer and the customer's data, was pioneered by Microsoft.

  148. 'pay while you hold' tech support by dargaud · · Score: 1
    I just moved back to Europe. Chose a random ADSL provider and ran into trouble installing it. (The install went great as I didn't touch their CD). The service was incredibly crappy, lines dropping every 10 minutes for 2~3 minutes, sometimes for several hours at less than 2kbps...

    I call tech support and was greeted by the following message: "Thank you for your call, you will be charged 60 cents a minutes for your call". Including the 20 minutes I spent holding before I hung up fuming.

    I guess that's the worse way to make money I've ever seen, but my parents were all surprised to hear about 800 free numbers in the US. Hell of a business plan: make a crappy product and charge customers for holding.

    I wrote them by email and 45 days later got an very generic answer in the form: "Make sure your modem is plugged in properly". What a joke. Stay away from free.fr at all cost.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:'pay while you hold' tech support by mabu · · Score: 1

      Stay away from free.fr at all cost.

      I'm not going to make a joke about this... I'm not going to make a joke about this... I will not measure the viscosity of the irony therein... no way.

  149. And people wonder... by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    ...why I build my own computers. If I had an office with 500 people, I'd still build my own computers.

    If there was a standard board and configuration for laptops that I could build myself, then I'd have a new laptop. Until then I'll get by without one. Is there one? Haven't checked recently. That would be cool.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  150. HK-47 from KOTOR... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...would call them meatbags :)

  151. Uninstall IE from 98? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did that _on purpose_ and it took me awhile. Let me shake this idiot's hand!

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  152. Support Ed Foster!!! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Informative


    AT & T Universal Card: Companies are not only using Indians to do jobs that were done by Americans. Companies are using Indians to further abuse their customers. I talked with one Indian woman at AT & T Universal Credit Card customer support who told me that she had no way to contact anyone but her Indian manager, and that the Indian manager had no way to contact anyone at AT & T. So, there is no way to resolve any legitimate problem. The logic seems to be, "Why should we hire Americans to abuse our customers? We should get Indians to do all the ugly jobs."

    ECS (Elitegroup) Motherboards: One of the answers is to call the technical support for a product before you ever buy the product. I wish I had done that before buying and testing 8 L7VTA V1 motherboards from ECS. I found that the ECS technical support line is a recording that says something like, "All of our customer support personnel are busy helping other customers. Please call back at a later time." There is no opportunity to leave a message. If you don't believe me, try it yourself: 510-226-7333 option 4 for technical support. Only one of the 8 motherboards works as advertised, and ECS will do nothing about it; they don't answer email either.

    Support Ed Foster: Maybe the only person who is doing anything about this is Ed Foster. Here are the companies in the GripeLog Hall of Shame: 1: Dell, 2: Microsoft 3: VeriSign 4: Intuit 5: Symantec 6: Network Associates 7: HP 8: Cisco.

    I've personally been abused by Microsoft, Symantec, Cisco, and Intuit. I have no desire to repeat that ugly experience. So, I try to stay away from anything they do. In my experience, they are not companies that sell computer software and hardware, and are sometimes abusive. They are abuse companies that also sell software and hardware. The world of computing would have been a far better place if Bill Gates had had a caring childhood. The world of computing would be a far worse place if we didn't have good leaders like Linus Torvalds.

    1. Re:Support Ed Foster!!! by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Oh I wish I had read this before getting involved with ECS. 2 dead mobos later, (one of which literally caught on fire), and I'm in ECS hell, with way too much money spent on said product. Stick to tyan, brothers...

      As an aside, I'm whoring for Promise Technology. 5 minutes and 1 fax (credit card RMA form for cross-ship), and I had a replacement card shipped to me next day (my dime on shipping, they offered free ground shipping on replacement warranteed cards). All I had to do was box up the bad card. $20 total. Top notch. Considering it saved $1000s in irreplaceable photographs... <sigh>

  153. Re:Oversea tech support by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

    1. As stated, corporate customers DON'T WANT first tier support. They employee people who are more knowledgeable than first tier support.

    2. The fee comes out of the IT department's training budget because Dell requires "training" before permitting you to order your own parts.

    3. You troubleshoot PC problems as a matter of course; often they're fixable. Even hardware problems can be fixed by using spare parts lying around.

    4. Dell passes the savings on to their customers. It's called "competition" and whoever submits the lowest bids to the big companies gets the contract.

    ------------

    If I ever want to feel like I've been cheated, I look at my company's financials and then look at my paycheck.

  154. salon violates me, i violate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    salon's silly daypass system has *never* worked for me. typically i get through all the ads, whatever they are, only to be punted right back to their frontpage again and asked if i'd like to view an ad for the free daypass. i'd do that gladly if i actually got to READ THE ARTICLE afterwards, but since i don't - i'm overjoyed that there are slashdot AC's willing to break their stupid copy prot^H^H^H^H^Hright.

  155. Re:Oversea tech support by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

    But in the end salaries will balance out just about everywhere.

    Wow, I doubt that. First off, there are billions of people earning a lot less than the compartively low paid knowledge workers in countries like India. Some are qualified to take fight for those offshored jobs, others will be - maybe in a year, maybe in 10 years, but they'll be there to compete.

    Plus, it's not like these jobs that go offshore go directly to someone at a lower rate. They go to a company that fills those positions. And I guarantee you they keep as much as they can.

    So what does this really mean? It means people who want jobs being shipped out of the US will work for much less than it looks like they are now.

    The only way you might outperform local salary averages is if your position requires physical proximity, and many don't, nowadays.

    What can you do? Buy some stock.


    Good advice. Buy stock and if you want real job security, do something that would be really difficult to send overseas.

  156. All BS? None? What? Either way, reinstall! by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 2, Funny

    Based on the last line of the story, I had to wonder if the whole thing was made up!

    But, I recall one of my best friends being trained to handle support at [name withheld, but a hugemongous PC company in Texas] in the early-mid 90s. If the user had an actual problem, as opposed to simply not being able to figure out an app, the first two things my friend was taught to try were:

    1) reboot the computer
    2) if that doesn't fix it, reinstall Windows.

    And he wasn't kidding me - that was how he approached his home system, afterwards, as well.

    He didn't stay in support very long, either.

  157. I've been trolled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >>Americans don't want these jobs

    So, I guess I'm not American, huh? I must have misunderstood the relationship between the geography I learned in school and what's on my birth certificate.

    >>$8/hr to flip burgers at McDonalds

    When the f*k did Mcdonalds raise their pay to $8/hr??

    >>$9/hr to get screamed at

    Wow, $9 per hour? my first tech support job only paid 8. And I didn't even quit when I discovered that my temp agency was internally listing my pay as $10 (as in, I was supposed to get $10/hr instead of $8) because I didn't think p'o.ing my first serious employer was good strategy.

    >>I'd take burger-flippin' any day. I may come home smelling like french fries, but a quick shower will fix that and that extra dollar just isn't worth it to me.

    You and I must be very different people. I feel exactly the opposite, I'd rather deal with frustrated people than be dirty, smelly, spattered with hot oil, and go home with legs aching from standing all day. After Mcdonalds one needs a shower. After tech support, usually all I need is beer or comedy or excersize.

  158. I'm just lucky I never got a Stream call center... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    because otherwise the endpoint of that 1-800 number would have been a smoking crater. I'd be a shame if I accidentally killed you; you seem nice enough.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  159. Re:Nothing new here... BULL*$@# ! by mnmlst · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While MS may have pioneered this approach in the tech field, most companies should not be in a position to emulate this callous disregard. After all, MS has long enjoyed monopoly power but hardly anyone can talk of most (any?) PC makers having monopoly power. It seems like such lousy service is not something these PC makers should be able to get away with providing. On the other hand, MS can barely warm over Windows 95 again, throw in a few features, recommend business buyers NOT purchase the product, and foist it on consumers as "Windows Millenium Edition" (not to be confused with the millenium edition of Windows NT known as Windows 2000). Now THAT's monopoly power.

    BTW, Neal Stephenson hit this nail on the head in his essay "In the Beginning was the command line" seen here. In the essay, he predicted a future MS operating system would consist of logging on and just seeing one button to click. Voila, I give you "Luna" in XP (years later).

    --
    In principio erat Verbum.
  160. Blame the business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a tech support survivor of nearly two years. I finally got out of that rat race and went back to school, and I have never looked back.

    Coming out of it, I really think you need to blame the business model. I worked on several different contracts, and the one thing that struck me in common was that businesses all saw support as an afterthought. Something they have to provide, but rather wouldn't. One major OEM I worked for had as a mandatory part of our call script that we would direct people to online self help at the end of our call. Clearly they were trying to push people to less expensive support alternatives.

    It's funny, because I worked for one of the "better" outsourcers (Sykes Enterprises). We were actually given fairly decent hands on training and had management that, while still definitely management, at least cared enough to put a human face to things, and to explain -why- we had to do things the way we did. And they were jerks on AHT (Average Handle Time) as long as you actually got issues resolved and kept the ACW (time between calls filling out notes) down. And for this, my company had difficulty holding onto contracts because we would be outbid by lower cost competitors promising higher callflow per buck. Businesses clearly cared a lot more for lowest price than highest quality. And even with a relatively decent employer, the job was still extremely high pressure.

    I was fortunate because I came in already knowing a lot, but you can't possibly know enough in this industry. You have no idea just how -obscure- computer trouble can be until you've worked the phones, and this is exponentionally compounded by trying to piece together what's going on from customers who don't know the vocabularly of computerspeek, let alone how to construct sentances with it - all they know is it's broken, and they need it fixed yesterday so they can finish their master's thesis. It's a bit like trying to perform brain surgery blindfolded while wearing oven mits, except even then you can actually touch what you're working on.

    As computers and electronics get more complicated -and- cheaper this is only going to get worse. Tech support -is- an expenditure - there is no direct profit involved to the manufacturers and service providers - only indirect benefits of customer retention/loyalty. We're already seeing this to a certain extent, and I forsee it becoming more prevalent - two tier support. You can get free support with underpayed, undertrained phone jockeys who may or may not fix the issue reading from their scripts, or you can call a fee based line, pay $2.00 a minute and get someone who actually knows what they're talking about. I think the days of high quality free support are numbered if they haven't passed already.

    Like I said, I left, and I'm never looking back.

  161. I almost worked there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got hired, put off my show up date a couple of times, and finally had to not take the job due to a scheduling thing. Did you ever know that Black chick named Mika? She's was a hotty, nice ass on the girl. I wouldn't have minded jumping on that Asian chick, Shannon, as well. She had that Valley Girl stuck-upness to her, but I bet she could fuck like a beast.

  162. Absolutely by G27+Radio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I worked briefly in a call center several years back. I got called into the manager's office because my average call time was too long. I pointed out that my average for successfully closed calls was higher than anyone else there, and that my average call times were only slightly higher than average for the call center.

    His response was basically, "Yes, that's very nice and all, but you need to lower your average call time." The next day I was getting really frustrated about my call times and just said to myself "Fuck it, this job sucks." So I sat there for a couple minutes just hitting the hang-up button every time a call was routed to me until the queue was empty.

    A week later I was called back into the manager's office. I thought to myself, "OK, this is it. Today I get fired." Instead I was congratulated on my much improved call times, given a cheesey award and told that I was being put in line for a minor promotion.

    I quit and found another job a couple weeks later.

    1. Re:Absolutely by gregarican · · Score: 1
      I was an IT Manager of a larger call center several years ago. I know of agents who tried to pad their stats by disconnecting customers as you mentioned. But what I find amazing is that some call centers don't invest time and money in call monitoring technology.

      There are many automated solutions that record agent conversations against their scheduled work times. Then supervisors can play back the conversations in order to help mentor and provide feedback. That in turn helps increase the knowledge level of call center agents, even amidst huge attrition rates.

      But then again those call centers solely interested in making a buck with no attention to customer care probably wouldn't spend money or branch out into these areas. A shame...

    2. Re:Absolutely by swb · · Score: 1

      Some of it can also be used to improve work, but usually its not.

      It's used by call center line management to justify their performance, or to bully employees. The latter is the worst -- show weak "numbers" to the employees, withhold performance pay, your costs are lower, you get a bigger bonus.

    3. Re:Absolutely by G27+Radio · · Score: 1

      But what I find amazing is that some call centers don't invest time and money in call monitoring technology.

      It's funny you should mention it, because my story is from over 10 years ago, and even then they had the technology installed to monitor individual call lengths. But even though the data was in the system, management probably only printed out the totals and averages for everyone. There was an old Okidata dot matrix printer connected to the phone system that would print out the reports once a week. It was slow, it jammed, it was loud, it was right next to people taking calls, and it was generally annoying. They probably avoided printing detailed reports for those reasons. They also had some kind of serial-connected terminal to it where they could look up the details as well as see our real-time stats. But in the end, they didn't end up noticing me or anyone else dropping the calls. As I mentioned in my last post, I didn't stay there much longer after that. If I had, and continued to purposely mass-drop calls, maybe eventually they would've caught on.

      For QA, though, management had to monitor live calls--recording absolutely everything back in those days was still cost prohibitive.

  163. the globalization dance by shrubya · · Score: 1
    Its balancing out jobs, but that balance is not being passed on. Cars are built in Mexico, but they are not costing any less

    Amazing, isn't it? Yep, the point of moving jobs to other countries is to pass the savings along to investors, not consumers. Eventually they'll equalize the wages in 1st and 3rd world countries. So instead of you earning $40000 per year and Jose earning $400 per year, in the future you both get $4000 per year. The remaining $32400 goes to dividends and executive bonuses. Enjoy!

  164. 5 Reasons to Build Your Own Machine by MagnaMark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reading this story reminds me why I build my own computers. I order all the components online. Typically the parts comes with a 1 or 3 yr manufacturer's warranty. And as long as you order from a reputable business with a reputation for good support, such as NewEgg, you're set.

    Other advantages of this approach:

    (1) You can save a fair amount of money.

    True, you can get a celeron-based machine for $300 from WalMart, but who knows what corners they're cutting? A lot of the quality of a computer is based on motherboard, type of memory, HDD speed, and other factors that are deemphasized by sellers who focus on CPU speed and HDD size.

    (2) You can better customize your components to match your needs: gaming, digital video, entertainment center, whatever. You end up with a higher quality computer for less money.

    (3) You don't have to deal with any tech support malarchy.

    (4) When (not if) your computer breaks, you get to trouble shoot the problem yourself. In the process, you gain a betterunderstanding of your computer. It can be a great learning process. And, the problem-solving aspect can be fun.

    (5) You don't have to replace an entire computer to upgrade it. Adding a new video card or more memory might be all you need. My computer is continually evolving.

    The big problem is that, as far as I know, this approach is not feasible for laptops, only desktops. If you need a laptop, you might have to end up dealing with big sellers and their tech support.

  165. MOD DOWN - BLATANT ADVERTISEMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like a cheap attempt at free advertising. you could have gotten your point across without mentioning your company's name & URL

  166. hrmm... by underworld · · Score: 1

    I tried to get to the article. The "ad" certainly played fine, but the article appears to be slashdotted.

    What's worse? This at the bottom of the error message:

    North American Help Desk (800) 943-8397
    European Help Desk +32 2 529-1230

    I'm afraid this might let me experience the article first hand....

  167. Don't disagree, but... by clary · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...I have so far found nothing, repeat nothing on the internet to coax me to open up my wallet and spend money to view it. If it is on the internet and worth seeing, somebody has the equivalent for free, and Google knows how to find it.

    In fact, with very limited exceptions such as Slashdot, I will not even go through a registration process. I have emailed the NYT to tell them that I did not find their content compelling enough to convince me to register to view it. (They were justifiably unimpressed, and offered to sell me a paper subscription. ;-)

    I do read all kinds of sites with banner ads. Who knows, maybe someday one will look so interesting that I will click it!

    --

    "Rub her feet." -- L.L.

  168. Average call answer time by edxwelch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to install phone systems for a German company and there was built in software that recorded all sorts of statistics. However the average answer time of the switchboard operator wasn't recorded. I found out later the reason was because of the strong unions in Germany there is a law preventing this type of information being recorded.

    1. Re:Average call answer time by frost22 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course not.

      Call centers and tech support work different here.

      First one you rarely see scripting. People get actually trained, usually in house.

      As for the unions, its not even a union thing. Employee monitoring tech by law is subject to agreement by the cpmpany's employee council - and they rarely do. So you usually end up with compromises like team based statistics, anonymized user data and such.

      --
      ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  169. There are sometimes ways.. by Channard · · Score: 1

    Even if your call centre cares enough to do something about you repeatedly hanging up - I never found out if my next to last job did - there are sometimes tricks. The call centre job I was in had a phone system so crappy that just hitting a certain button combination (I can't remember which) would crash the phone, disconnecting the call without anyone being any wiser. Nice.

  170. Re:Oversea tech support by Alex+Reynolds · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Quick response:

    Dell should provide this service free of charge, and shouldn't require "training" costs for anyone involved if they're not going to bother paying for staff on their own end.

    Dell does not generally pass savings on to customers. If anything, Dell's prices have remained as high as any other name-brand vendor, even in quantity. They are the largest PC vendor in the world, have the most efficient supply chain and should automatically be able to provide lower costs, service issues aside.

    If you really want to feel cheated, think about how your employer is kicking back money to Dell (or whomever, for services that Dell should be paying for) and how that comes out of your paycheck.

  171. Re:Oversea tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Globalization will balance everything out in the long run, but the first few hundred years are going to piss a lot of people off.

    If globalization took a few hundred years, it wouldn't annoy anyone. It is changes that happen quickly enough that you don't have time to adjust to them that are causing people heartburn.

    In the end, it all boils down to what economists call comparative advantage. The explanation is pretty simple. If there are two countries, A and B. A makes a widget for $10 and a doohickey for $10. B can make a widget for $12 and a doohickey for $15. Country B will make widgets and country A will make doohickeys because B is more efficient at making widgets.

    Now, as for globalization, you have to take everything that gets produced. Sadly for those people looking for someone to give them a job, labor is not what we do efficiently in the US. That's partly the result of our relative wealth and partly because of shortsighted laws that make hiring someone in this country more expensive than it has to be. We can provide capital to the process. If you don't have capital, well, you are going to have to find something else to produce. Specialized expertise can be a money-maker, but you have to know something and you have to be able to sell it.

    There are an awful lot of people around who aren't prepared to sell their skills. Yes, I'm a software engineer. Yes, a couple of years ago, I was downsized at the same time that my company was hiring in India, China and several other places with cheap labor. Yes, I've had to look for work then. Yes, I've had to look since. I haven't taken a pay cut yet for two reasons. First, I wasn't overpriced during the telecom/dotCom bubble. Second, I'm pretty good at selling my skills. It isn't solely about what tech skills you have. Its about showing an employer that you know how to make money or save money using them. If I can save you a million dollars a year for the next five years doing something that you're going to need to pay me and two other guys $200K for over the next 6 months, that'll get me into your office. If I can present a business case you can believe, that'll get me a job.

  172. exaggerated? unfair description of top vendors? by big!theory · · Score: 2, Informative
    I subscribe to salon so i've the read the whole article ad-free.

    Although i hate bad tech support as much as the next guy, i thought the article was over-the-top. it sounds like tech-support stereotyping. the author has been permitted to omit identifying information. I wonder if salon really did due diligence on this piece.

    The writer says he works for one of the top three computer manufacturers. Presumably he's talking about PCs. Who would that be? Dell, HP, IBM?

    I've dealt with Dell. Sorry, they are simply not nearly that bad. I'd say the same for HP, although they are less competent than Dell. I've dealt with IBM on the server side. They are far better than the writer describes. Some posters seem to think he is talking about Indian tech support. The writer never said that, and all the names are English/American. I have generally found Indian tech support to be really bad, but they haven't been able to authorize replacement parts. That has always been done by usa-based Level 2 support. At the writer's company, they regularly authorize replacements (see "givers" in the article).

    An interesting article, I conclude, but not to be taken literally. It is an encapsulation of all that is wrong with tech support. But not a fair representation of Dell, HP, or IBM support. BTW, the Salon website is really dragging today. I've been getting timeouts. The Slashdot Effect strikes again!

  173. Meh. by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    Colour blindness?

  174. Re:Tech Support Nightmare Site for Compaq Computer by Karth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Corporate support vs. user support is a whole different ball game. Corpies usually have several things going for them:

    It's an IT tech calling, not joe user.

    When they call, they have their corp support contract info in front of them.

    They didn't do something stupid to the machine, like, say, jam a pen in the power supply fan to get it to stop buzzing.

    This makes it real easy to go "oh, ok, it broke, you need an RMA, did you do anything like drop it kick it spill water on it etc" they say "nope, just died", you go, ok rma. Thanks!

    That's corp support, in a nutshell. Every once in a while you get a big issue, but it usually affects a lot more people than just one, so you fix 50 computers at once, not just joe user's screwed up mouse port.

  175. Is this journalism? by mi · · Score: 1
    All names have been changed

    Of course, they have. Because we are afraid to back up our words with any claims of fact. The story reads like a piece of satire -- pointed, bitter, and funny. But its claim to be factual is greatly blunted, by reluctance to name the contracting company and the PC manufacturer involved.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  176. My personal experience by venomix · · Score: 1

    I worked with tech support for a while between high school and the university, and I'll say it's the worst thing I've ever done. I worked at a steel factory for a while and that was much better.

    First of all, a lot of the people I worked with had really no experience of fixing computer problems, and the management were even worse. All they looked at was the number of logs you had written and how much pause time you had in the phone system.

    Regarding the work itself it was rather ok as long as you helped people with their technical problems, although about 50% of the calls were from angry customers yelling about that their computer has been in service for 2 days longer than it should be, or that the same error still was there after a repair etc... And taking those calls when you had no chance at all to really do anything about the problem was the worst thing of it all. Beeing polite to people who yell at you and call you names, telling them that you will hurry up the process as much as you can when you know you won't do anything about it anyway, because you can't.

    I wouldn't recommend my worst enemy to work with tech support.

  177. No more Salon free pass articles please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their 1-day-pass subscription server has been shut down to prevent the Slashdot crowd from getting 1-day passes. It's not Slashdotted, it's refusing connections - shut down.

    Way to Salon-whore, guys.

  178. May I have your first name please? by bodland · · Score: 1

    (site ./ed)

    I did phones, for a large software maker's new and legacy operating system. You might be familiar with them..This was back in the heady days of 1995 (get it 95?) I had 8 weeks of traiing on the products, 6 hours on phones, two hours off. Took between 15 and 30 calls per day. I can say that the experience was good. The management was very keen to keep the culture fun and customer statisfaction high.

    The people who worked at Softmart Inc. formerly SPC Software's technical support call center, (Office Writer) Softmart purchased SPC's call center to provide helpdesk support for software customers. It soon became one of the leading outsourced partners for technical support.

    For a brief time between 1993 and 1997 this organization and it's managers created one of the best call centers in the world and it was a fine organization to work for. We had loads of fun, learned a lot in my two years there I had over 8 weeks of 40 hour per week training.

    We had mentors, knowlege exchanges, games, contests, KB's, smorgasboards, happyhours at nearby Babes...mmmm nachos and beer...full bennies and plenty of challenge and rubber band and nerf gun fights. And we helped a lot of people. I owe a lot to the experience I gained there. It was one of the funnest jobs I had.

    When a company is run well by smart motivated people good things can happen. Unfortunately the division was sold by the folks back east and as usual the new owners turned the call center into a death march.

    Typical.

  179. Re:Apple by ISPTech · · Score: 1

    Actually for computers you get 1 year and then get applecare. It's well worth it though. Applecare doesn't screw around with you and they speak proper English.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  180. Some outsourced support is Great! by _LMark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I realize that many people have bad experiences with Indian and Pakistani tech support, but I just want to note that I had difficulties setting up a Netgear wireless base station/router to play well with a Linux firewall/router running NAT. Now clearly this is not a standard setup for home users and was in fact clearly noted as unsupported, however, I called to resolve 2 separate issues with (clearly) Indian tech support. Both times the person I spoke with was extremely knowledgeable and went out of their way to get me running. I haven't run into many American support staff who could help me with any technical questions, especially with non officially supported set ups.

    Not trying to flame, just to put a little balance into the picture. "Americanized" foreign call centers seem disingenuous to me, however, if outsourcing SOME support results in skilled support staff being affordable, I'm OK with that. It just seems that the dialogue about outsourcing needs to be balanced with by recognizing where it can be a good thing rather than automatically cry that the sky is falling.

    I know, I know, why be reasonable when we can freak out and spread lots of FUD. I am on /. for godsakes...

    --
    'the Internet is right.'
  181. Historical context by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Sure he can buy something a bit cheaper today, but if the trend continues*, his own job will be going to India (or wherever) and he won't be able to buy anything tommorow (for lack of income), regardless on how cheap it is.

    Doubtful. You do realize that people have been making this shortsighted, Luddite argument for hundreds of years? Ever since the original Luddites broke mechanical looms when they feared that those looms would take their jobs?

    Well, they were part right, as are you: those looms DID take their jobs. However, they got BETTER jobs that were then available because less of the country's labor was busy making things that could be done by machine. And if they were too dense to get the better jobs, their kids certainly did.

    The point is this: offshoring jobs, or replacing humans with machines, is a natural part of the labor cycle. At some point, many jobs become commodity, either because they are unnecessary, become too easy, or because too many people can do them. As the world economy changes, certain jobs go from being expert work to non-expert work, ultimately to machine work. You don't complain because a compiler stole the job of an assembly coder, do you?

    Note that the US has maintained its status as an economic powerhouse over the last 60+ years by constantly evolving its labor market. People argued your same argument 40 years ago that manufacturing jobs shouldn't have been mechanized or offshored. They were, and no permanant unemployment resulted. But what if we hadn't offshored those industries? America would be nothing, economically, today.

    Bottom line, you can't fight economic trends. You can postpone them and make things worse through an isolationist economy, but you can't change them.

    The American economy may be expanding, but it's not expanding nearly as fast as India's or China's. The American economy is not creating jobs nearly as fast as it's loosing them.

    As to the first part,it's guaranteed, because China and India are not developed economies. As such, pretty much every Asian economy (other than Japan) has grown faster than America in the last decade. As to the second part, care to substantiate? Outside of the recent recession, that's blatantly false, to which employment statistics will testify. Net American jobs have increased in the last 10 years.

    manufacturing is all but gone from this country

    Yes, just as it's gone from all of the first world, nearly. Manufacturing jobs don't pay much. Americans don't want them. Americans have better jobs.

    and services are also leaving

    And new ones are generated every day. So what?

    From IT (programming jobs and tech support) to accounting no job is safe from an Indian worker earning a 10th of what his american counterpart makes.

    Sure there is. Learn to do something that an uneducated Indian worker CAN'T DO! Look, with all the advantages we have from growing up in America, if there is nothing you can do better than someone from a third world country, you don't deserve a job.

    There is only a need for so many doctor (even that they can do remotely these days) or burger flippers.

    Really? How many people go to India for burgers or to see their doctor? Because if that's your argument, it's not about offshoring, because those jobs can't be offshored. That's about racism. You know what I call an Indian with US citizenship living in America? An American. And you should too.

    1. Re:Historical context by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      How many people go to India for burgers...?

      Not many, I would imagine, considering the sacred position of cows there.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:Historical context by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      Not many, I would imagine, considering the sacred position of cows there.

      Nice. ;) You know, when you're 16, drunk, and bored, an affected Indian accent and a call to the Burger King customer service line can provide hours of entertainment.

    3. Re:Historical context by genner · · Score: 1

      "Sure there is. Learn to do something that an uneducated Indian worker CAN'T DO! Look, with all the advantages we have from growing up in America, if there is nothing you can do better than someone from a third world country, you don't deserve a job." The problem is most companies don't care if we can do it better they just want it cheaper. This creates higher stock prices and more bonus money for ceo's and members of the board. The companies then go bankrupt as people wont buy inferior products. The board walks away with the money made off the stock and we loose our jobs. The bottom line is outsourceing countries are being used irresponsibly to the determint of the U.S. economy.

    4. Re:Historical context by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>You don't complain because a compiler stole the job of an assembly coder, do you?

      No. But any assembly coder worht his salt would have been able to learn C or COBOL back in the day. He still has his local job available to him.

      These days those programming jobs are moving far far away.

      This isn't meant to be a personal attack, but could you please, in your wisdom, tell us what a guy is supposed to do when his whole industry moves to India or China?

      And please don't just say retrain. Retrain in what.... and who should pay for it. And pay his mortgage and his kid's schooling while he retrains and gets a new entry level job in something 'better'.

      Please keep in mind that this isn't just happening to 1 guy, but 10's of thousands.

      Oh yeah, did the 'retrain and get a better job' theory work for all those poor souls who lost their manufacturing jobs in the 70's 80's and 90's? Using this as an example, personally I'm afraid for my future.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    5. Re:Historical context by avdp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The point about burgers and doctors is that (in my doomsday scenario) those would be the ONLY jobs left in the US (for practical reasons, nothing to do with racism). Enough jobs to employ just a small fraction of the US population.

      When manufacturing jobs went abroad, everybody said - fine, we'll be a service based industry. But service jobs are leaving too. So, please tell me, what else is there? I do hope that someday that "better job" you describe will make itself evident.

      There is an arrogant view (just below the surface in your post) that Americans are smarter than foreigner and therefore we'll always be one step ahead in terms of skills and jobs. As a foreigner (now living in the US) I don't buy it. There is no reason that every single service job in the US can't be moved to India (or wherever). It just will take a little time to implement.

    6. Re:Historical context by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      When manufacturing jobs went abroad, everybody said - fine, we'll be a service based industry. But service jobs are leaving too. So, please tell me, what else is there? I do hope that someday that "better job" you describe will make itself evident.

      Constant innovation. America was an industrial powerhouse in the 50's. However, virtually none of the top jobs from that time are performed currently in the US. That's what makes a dominant economy - constant innovation, with a versatile workforce that can pick up new things faster than the rest of the world. You can't look at things statically - we've continually lost industries to overseas for the last 50-100 years, yet our economy hasn't suffered in the least from it. In fact, we've benefitted, because we do things the rest of the world can't...yet. But we have to keep one step ahead to justify the premiums in terms of salary etc. that American workers command.

      There is an arrogant view (just below the surface in your post) that Americans are smarter than foreigner and therefore we'll always be one step ahead in terms of skills and jobs.

      I assure you, I believe nothing of the sort. As Americans, we have the benefit of being raised in the world's strongest economy and an amazing university system. That is an incredible advantage, and a competent American should be able to utilize it. If a foreigner without those benefits produces work of higher quality or on par with that from American workers, he deserves the job.

      As a foreigner (now living in the US) I don't buy it. There is no reason that every single service job in the US can't be moved to India (or wherever). It just will take a little time to implement.

      Quite right, but apply my above analysis - by that time, America will have moved on to something else that we excel at. And if we stop doing that, we don't deserve the high salaries we make. Basically, if America doesn't continue to be a dominant economy, its standard of living will drop. Just as happens everywhere else in the world. It's basic economics, and should come as no surprise. And believe me, I don't subscribe to any nationalist theories. America continues to do one thing truly well, and that is its University system that acts as a "brain drain" for the rest of the world. Heck, you are a foreigner living in the US...and you're reading slashdot, so I assume you're technically trained. We got you didn't we?

      Also note, that there may come a time where most of the world has moved on to become developed economies. However, realize that this brings as many (or more, likely) consumers to the table compared to competitors for jobs. So economics isn't a zero-sum game here - it's possible to make things better for everyone. In fact, the more jobs move to India, the better the Indian economy gets, increasing wages, and decreasing the motivation to move more jobs. If anything, we live in a temprorary time during which Indian technical training has risen faster than wages, something that will iron itself out in a few years.

      I truly believe that only the poorly skilled have anything to worry about long-term.

    7. Re:Historical context by avdp · · Score: 1

      Another thing I generally don't buy, is that the university system is any better here than abroad. And I've experience several of them. In fact I find it rather mediocre at best over here. But maybe that's another topic for another day.

      But I like your general optimism that about constant innovation. You've got the right attitude. Time will tell if it stays true.

    8. Re:Historical context by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 1

      The point about burgers and doctors is that (in my doomsday scenario) those would be the ONLY jobs left in the US (for practical reasons, nothing to do with racism).

      You left out infrastructure jobs: electricians, plumbers, ditch-diggers, etc....

      It's AWFULLY hard to unclog a pipe over the phone! (or to import a road.)

      --
      What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
    9. Re:Historical context by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      You assume that previous trends will continue. Certainly, many of the things we take for granted today will be 100% automated in the future. What job do you propose I should start training for, when that day comes?

      The only one that comes to mind, is as a wealthy investor in robotics manufacturers.

    10. Re:Historical context by avdp · · Score: 1

      Yep. All of those. But if there is nobody that can afford to build houses, you won't need quite as many. Also teachers - but with a very high unemployment rate local tax revenue takes a serious dip and so the school district won't be able to pay a whole lot of them... Same with roads.

      That's the point I am trying to get across - sure there is a category of workers that are seemingly safe, but with both manufacturing and service jobs going abroad and no middle class to speak of, it seems this country won't be doing very well.

      I know it's a doomsday scenario. Hopefully the trend will slow or stop. We will see.

    11. Re:Historical context by danheskett · · Score: 1

      In regards to the US University system - there is a college or university in the US for just about every type of person.

      It's funny. In the UK, they are considering charging a fairly low tuition for state college education. On NPR they had an interview with an angry college-age protestor, who complained that if the government instituted this onerous tutition law that higher education in the UK would become like that in the US, where "only the upper classes can afford to go".

      It was with full irony borne that the commentator noted that a far larger percentage of students went on to college in the US - across all economic classes.

      Why is this? Because in many countries - including many European ones - college is just for the top students. It is the exclusive home of the cream of the cream of the students.

      In the US, even fully mediocre students go on to college. In fact, there are colleges designed for poor students.

      The point being, that the range of colleges in the US is very wide. We have absolutely cutting-edge, highly rated, competitive, innovative, awe inspiring educational facilities - think RIT, RPI, John Hopkins, etc. And we also have mediocre state run institutions.

      All in all, there is something for just about everyone.

    12. Re:Historical context by avdp · · Score: 1

      Well, I understand there are a handful of top notch schools that definetely rank on a worldwide basis. But I would suggest they are definetely the exception rather than the rule. They probably represent less than 5% of the higher education capacity in this country (yes, I made that number up, it's just a wild guess).

      For most people, the state run systems ARE the only choice both financially but certainly being able to get in (those few top notch schools have very few spots).

      I prefer to judge the higher education system based on what the vast majority of people attend. Not what the select few get to attend.

      College in Europe (which is where I come from) is NOT for the top students. If fact it's close to free (despite of the English complaining - I heard that NPR piece too) and remarkably easy to get in (often a HS diploma is all you need). BUT - and that's where they differenciate themselves from the US system - much harder to graduate from. In general, there is no grade inflation problem in Europe, let me tell you. In this country it's VERY easy to cruise through and get your diploma with very little delay and a B average. An A average takes a little bit more effort, but barely. That's been my experience of the higher education system in this country, and I don't consider myself exceptionally bright either.

      As far "popularity" of US School, I think this has more to do with the fact that 1) it's in the US and the US is powerful nation and 2) English is the universal language. That definetely was my reason. I venture to say that a top notch university in Poland (for example) is not likely to attract many if any foreign students.

  182. They forgot the speech police part of it. by Gldm · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm not sure if it was the same at whatever computer manufacturer the article writer worked at, but when I was at a major ISP, we were randomly monitored on our calls, and then "coached back" on them. One of the rules they beat into your head in training (ours was about 3-4 weeks and we were at least competent on things that were our problems) was you are not allowed to use any negative words such as no, don't, not, can't, etc . Oh and you have to use positive words. And no monotone, you have to sound interested. And be sure to ask the customer's name and use it at least 3 times. And be sure and thank them when they do what you ask them to. All this part of the job was scored by an outsourcing company that would recieve 6 randomly recorded calls per tech per month to rate.

    This made the job just a teensy bit more difficult when a customer is demanding you stop sending them porn popups and you have no way to say it's not coming from us and we have nothing to do with it, because you're not allowed to say no. Instead you have to try and quickly come up with some hippie bullshit that's "phrased positively" like "These popups are used to generate advertising revenue and usually come from the website you're reading, or sometimes from software that has been installed on your computer. We only provide the internet connection so the popups come from other sources." Which always results in a customer going into a screaming rage about how they never had this with AOL and they never installed anything that does this etc.

    Oh, the other fun one was that while trying to keep your call under 10 minutes, solving a problem or getting a customer to believe it's someone else's support they need to talk to ("But my computer is fine, it's the internet that's broken!") you have to document all your calls and everything you've done on them in a form which is saved so people can later look up what you did. Most techs heavily skimped on this to save time, which meant whoever had to reference their sheets later when the customer calls in for the 4th time that day screaming about slow downloads has no idea what the problem is or what the last tech tried to do to troubleshoot it.

    And yes, I did solve all the problems, even the lady who had a BIOS with bad power management that would cause her HP to shut down anytime the USB ports recieved too much traffic, like when using the USB port on the modem, who had already called HP 4 times recieved a replacement computer twice from best buy, etc. I called her back when I found out the problem by searching on my lunch break and had her reconnect on ethernet. Then I told her to call HP and tell them she wanted a BIOS update (I had her write it down) and here's the technical articles explaining what's going on and why it's their fault.

    Yeah my times were crap, barely below the cutoff levels. But after 2 months I tried to stab myself so I'd have an excuse not to go into work, so I decided it was better to quit. Back to job searching again.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  183. Re:Sounds like someone has a case of the Mondays. by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you posted a link where it's spelled with an "O" in the user comments, and that person isn't even sure "...inotech, or something ending in 'tech'"

    It's Initech. Sorry.

    Chris

  184. Why is everyone bitching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    about indian call centers here? Isnt the article about american ones? or did I miss something?

  185. Re:Sounds like someone has a case of the Mondays. by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

    Here's a nice image for you: http://www.aquanuke.com/item-3388284024.asp

    Chris

  186. Why does this obviously-bad situation persist? by Urban+Garlic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, hopelessly naive question:

    It seems that the root of the problem described in the article is that the contract with the company pays for calls completed, not problems solved. That company's customers are apparently enraged at their treatment. To the naive reader, it seems as though the contracting company could save money and improve customer relations at the same time by rewriting their phone-support contract to reward the call center based on actual problems solved.

    All you guys from the real world, why doesn't this happen? Is it actually impossible to measure? Has anyone ever tried it?

    --
    2*3*3*3*3*11*251
  187. Re:Sounds like someone has a case of the Mondays. by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, but I'm going to go with the coffee mug, which is the same as the sign in front of the building.

    Which is why I told you to watch your DVD again.

    Chris

  188. Sounds familiar by mdw2 · · Score: 1

    As a former tech support representative for a very large national phone company that does DSL I have to say it's basically all true.

    Though my training was 2 weeks of genuine training. There were 4 trainers AFAIK, 3 of them were horrid, and the one I had actually new quite abit about why things actually failed and tried to make sure the class LEARNED something, I was happy about that. I ended up being the first person to ace the training test (?? that's just weird) and there was one person in my class who I counted as intelligent in addition to myself.

    Once I got out on the floor taking calls, I realized that among the few hundred call takers and the supervisors who we were supposed to ask for help, there were 2 other people on the floor who i considered to have deeper knowledge than I, one was a tech agent, and another was a supervisor. It is a sad state of affairs when you have supervisors coming to you to ask for the answer to someone elses question.

    The only redeeming part of that job was to hear the sigh of relief when your response to the fact that they're running linux or bsd was "oh, what kernel version?" instead of "is that windows or mac?"

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  189. Good Old Fashioned Testing by DotDotSlasher · · Score: 1

    It seems that the real problem here is the all-important calls-handled number. This is the only statistic that the parent company (the unnamed one that contracted with the tech-support company) cares about.
    Obviously, what's also important is how well real problems are solved. So, I would suggest the parent company occasionally have a shill call in with a bogus problem. The caller knows what the problem is, but goes through the motions to determine how well tech supports handles customers and how problems are solved. The results of a few tests like this would be more important than some bogus "Take 2 minutes to tell us how our customer service department did" survey.
    Similar techniques should be used in airport security so the workers know that sometimes people will come through with a some item that should be flagged.
    Good testing is hard but worthwhile.

  190. Help the profitable callers, abuse the rest... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think there are a number of reasons for this. First of all, most people don't look at service when they buy, they just look at price. You can have the best support in the world, but if nobody buys your product because it costs more, the company dies.

    Companies have also realized that some customers are way more profitable than others. That's why Dell gives consumer customers cheap outsourced Indian techs, and corporate Optiplex/Latitude customers US support. If Joe Smith decides not to buy his next $399 Dimension from you, big deal. If Fortune 500 company decides not to buy several million worth of servers from you, that's a problem.

    Stores that sell extended warrenties also win when manufacturer warrenties suck. It seems worth an extra hundred or two hundred bucks to be able to walk into a store and walk out with a brand new PC instead of arguing with someone for 3 days so they can wait 2 weeks for them to send you out a part you have to replace yourself (which can be a big deal if you are an average user). These can be a big profit center for stores, so the stores kind of win when manufacturer support is suck.

  191. This is all predicted by rpillala · · Score: 3, Informative

    You all should read The Electronic Sweatshop by Barbara Garson. Basically, in a company decisions are moved up the hierarchy so that people at low levels can be easily trained, paid less, and easily replaced. In that order. Ideally no training would be required, cutting the employee replacement cost even further. You see this obviously at McDonald's but less obviously in fields like social work, and more slowly in education.

    The book itself is mostly conversations with people in jobs of this kind, or anecdotal records of those people. There's very little preaching by the author, if any.

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/01 40121455/103-0830543-8955814?v=glance

    Ravi

    --
    When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  192. That was so true.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I used to have a job at an unnamed ISP with a reputation for good tech support which had merged with a second ISP who had a reputation for TERRIBLE support. Aside from some horror stories from my friends who used this second ISP, I have some personal experience--

    Although I didn't work the phones personally, I did have the opportunity to spend a few hours riding tandam with random support people-- they'd plug an extra pair of headphones into their phones and you just sat and listened to the exchanges...

    I could NOT believe how horrible these tech support people are. I actually listened to one of them lecture a customer about how having DSL was a "privilege" and they should feel lucky to even be considered for the service-- never mind the fact that this person had stayed home several days in a row and the installer never showed up. Fast calls they were willing to help, but anything that looked like it was going to take more than a couple minutes they blew off.

    There was a giant LED "stock ticker" in the room that spewed out statistics.. I don't know exactly what they meant, but I got the impression it was the high-tech equivalent of the big fat dude pounding on the drums in those Trojan slave ships. You could hear the desperation and frustration in the caller's voices.. It was not a happy day for me.

  193. Whatever happened to the other video? by antdude · · Score: 1

    It used to be http://www.deadtroll.com/index2.html?/video/hellde skcable.html~content ... this one was a re-enactment with him training a newbie on helpdesk. It was working on 2/10/2004 according to my history list.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  194. Clean water, brought to you by GE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company responsible for all those PCBs in the Hudson river......

  195. Problem with DSL ... by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    in my area is that VERIIZON owns the lines, Verizon here SUCKS. Any DSL provider has to use Verizons lines, I have DSL at my office (because I couldn't get cable, or rather would have to shell out $2000 to install equipment in our office building) and that was once out for almost 2 weeks due to a faulty Pair. They initially blamed Covad for a faulty DSLAM. However, they actually had to put our number on another physical pair because they couldn't figure out the problem.

    Had the same type of Problem with Verizon when installing Frame Relay (remote office, no DSL no Cable available), they had to install new cabling, then said the new cabling was faulty, ad infinitum - took 3 months beyond the contract date to install (the contract install date was 3 months from the day we executed the signed documents)

    AT&T Broadband was 3 years ago, I couldn't get DSL in the area so I HAD to go cable. Plus DSL has a higher latency and I love my games.

    Comcast cable here has been rock solid, and even upped our downstream to 3mbps (I know that's due to the increased pressure from DSL prices), but it's fast as hell. Now maybe not many people in my neighborhood have Cable yet, but until they get it Imma enjoy my fat pipe. Haven't had to call customer support - so they may very well suck (Going on 1 year).

    Actually I did call support, but that was because a gardening contractor had cut my cable.

    1. Re:Problem with DSL ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      charter tech support isnt bad.

      i called them to inform that a mail server had the wrong time, so emails would appear way off (had a client upset that we didnt email back, even thouhg we had)

      and they fixed the problem,. not bad because it had to go from a tech support person on up the chain to get to the real admins.

  196. Re:Tech Support Nightmare Site for Compaq Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no offense, but the site Compaqsucks.com is loaded with clubies and your general assortment of idiots that in all honesty, should not be allowed to own or operate a computer.

  197. Choice quotes.... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some quotes from the guy I mentioed in the cubicle next to me:

    "...are you fucking retarded?"

    "I am sorry, I can't fix stupidity."

    "Yeah, it's the email chip. Maybe someone at the factory replaced it with an idiot chip."

    "Of course it works, it's a god damn Mac."

    "You're annoying me, I am cancelling your warranty."

    That's all that comes to mind right now.

    1. Re:Choice quotes.... by Grimster · · Score: 1

      Whoa this dude is my hero and he sounds just like my old buddy John haha great times.

      The funniest was this lady who insisted whoever helped her was rude, usually while they were loading her PC FOR HER into her car. She came back several times with a "bad pc" we could find nothing wrong with it. She told my assistant that the owner was rude to her (our owner was nothing but sugar and honey to customers, sometimes it made me sick he'd tell them WHATEVER they wanted to hear regardless of the facts, but you couldn't have made him get rude if you smacked him then pissed on him). Then she told John I was rude, then she told the owner Chris was rude, typically shedding some tears in the process (really creepy).

      We finally gave her a new machine, took hers, reformatted it and sold it as new to someone else (ugh some of the crap we did under orders). She never had a problem with the new one, and the guy who bought her old one never had a problem either.

      She brought me a big plate of homemade peanut butter fudge for Xmas, everyone else was too scared to eat it, I half expected it to be laced with something, I ate it anyway. I survived.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
  198. Interesting article. Thanks for posting it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I laughed. I cried.

    And the really sad part is that I
    found the whole thing believable.
    Coporations today are so far
    removed from reality, that they
    actually consider keeping their
    customers happy a burden, rather
    than something they should do to
    improve their business. It's a
    real shame.

    j
    --------------
    I kept getting a "connection refused"
    error, when trying to watch the stupid
    ad, so I couldn't read the article on
    salon.com

  199. How about an updater? by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work with a guy whose answer to any problem he can't or doesn't want to solve is to tell the user to go to Windows Update and install all the updates and call back when they are done. I've heard him do this even on problems where an email has been sent out with the exact instructions on how to resolve an easily resolvable known issue. It's brilliant though, because it usually takes the user so long to do that chances are when they call back he's either gone or doesn't answer the phone and someone else has to deal with it. And who is going to argue that patching security flaws is a bad thing, even if it doesn't solve their problems.

  200. tech support personality mods by mabu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure many here know what I'm talking about. Having done tech support for many years, I noticed that I started to develop a certain tone in my voice, a subtle condescending ring to statements when I would try to help a customer, for example, who claimed to have a problem, and noted there was an 'error message' but didn't think the actual error message was worth remembering. In these situations, it's SO hard to not just want to call the customer a complete idiot. Many help desk people have this recurring frustration which eventually leads to the classic "computer nerd arrogance". What can you do about it? I noticed that I started carrying this tone into other conversations and it was getting very annoying. Unfortunately, the condescending approach to dealing with many problem users ended up being very effective in making them aware that much of these problems could be solved themselves and that they weren't paying attention.

    Eventually I got away from having to do so much tech support but to this day, I'm aware that my personality is affected by years of dealing with idiots who refused to even pay attention to the problem as it was clearly described to them.

    If you're in this field, you need to be aware that this subtle personality mod can happen. It's driven home when you see skits like SNL's "Nick Burns, your company's computer guy."

  201. Is Email support any better? by Jaycatt · · Score: 1

    Aside from the phone technical support, a lot of companies try to get you to use email support as an option. Does this actually work better than phone support? I would imagine it's just easier to delete emails and remove the problem of pesky customers than it is on the phone. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

    --
    "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
    1. Re:Is Email support any better? by diggitzz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I used to work for a company that did a majority of the tech support via email. There were two of us who did the support, one guy in the morning, and me in the afternoon. More than 3/4 of his email responses were to the effect of "Clear your browser cache and delete the cookies, and thanks for using our software!"

      So, he'd leave at lunch with a vast majority of the questions "answered", and I'd get slowed up for two reasons: 1) actually answering new questions that came in and 2) re-answering the questions he'd "answered" when the customers wrote back in the afternoon.

      Guess who was promoted?

      --
      -=[You cannot consistently judge this statement to be true.]=-
  202. Re:2 cents and 2 more by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
    I had a problem with Excel resizing my spreadsheets after patching Windows. None of the patches touched Excel so I did not have a clue as to how to fix the problem. Changed the system and Excel wanked.

    Called Microsoft's pay-for-support service; $35 until the problem's fixed. Two and half hours later we figured out that Microsoft had changed the font metrics on Arial. Excel computes cell sizes based on Arial font metrics. When Arial changed, so did my print areas. The tech was obviously Indian, obviously smart and curious enough to spend the 2 hours it took to figure out what was going on. I didn't care about the $35 to find out in what mystical way Microsoft screwed up - I just wanted to know what had changed so I could undo it.

    Contrast that to estamps.com. Free tech support and worth every penny. Software crashes my printer taking the postage with it and all the tech can say is "tough." They don't have much competition right now so they can get away with it but that will change.

  203. Re:Nothing new here... BULL*$@# ! by Dalcius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I would think the companies using these "Support Centers" will suffer for their callous disregard for their customers."

    Most computer users that I know think computer mayhem is just normal. Most folks just want it to work and don't want to put in any more effort than the minimum to continue on with life.

    Taking it a little further, most folks just want things to work in general. The less hassle, the better, and companies know this. At the end of the day, people take the path of least resistance.

    I generally think people are too used to being screwed over to hold the company accountable or they're just too apathetic. That's why these draconian contracts and bad service are the norm. Until people stop giving these companies their money, this is the problem we'll have.

    Cheers

    --
    ~Dalcius
    Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
  204. Tech Support for some large company (true story) by crawdaddy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I got hired on doing tech support for (one of?) the largest software companies in the world. The only call center for this department of theirs is in Austin. If anyone knows who I'm talking about, say it, for I am fearful of their wrath. I'm not fond of getting LEGAL WARNINGS AT MY HOME ADDRESS FOR SOMETHING I DID ONLINE (HINT HINT).

    The training was decent, when the instructor was able to speak over the people in the back of the class talking. Usually that was only when the people in the back of the class were sleeping. We were told to try and keep a 7-minute average call time, which was impossible because the databases to search for registered customers were slow as hell (especially since they ran off the software developed by the company we were supporting...HINT HINT). If a customer wasn't in the database, we had to add them, which was even slower. Then we had to search on the intranet's knowledge base (KB), which, by the way, was slow, until we found the problem. We were told specifically not to say anything that wasn't in the KB and that if we were smart, the only words coming out of our mouths would either be from a script from training or a script from the KB. This included denying knowledge of pending lawsuits against said company for fraud, much less denying knowledge of the Attorney General looking into unethical business practices, etc. Thankfully, I was fired on the third day because I opened up a DOS prompt to ping a user. Sure, I had to save a file called dos.bat onto the desktop that contained the line "cmd" in it to get to the prompt, but even so, I was never told that going to a DOS prompt was an offense punishable by termination.

    I wasn't sad to go, though. So many calls were related to the previously mentioned class action suit against the company or the problem that inspired the lawsuit that I wanted to wash my hands each time I finished a call. The official policy was that if the user hadn't purchased an extended warranty (possibly needed 2-3 if they had purchased their product long enough in the past), then they would have to send in their product and pay a $100 repair fee because a faulty part in the product finally failed completely and, even though the company was aware that many products were shipped with said faulty products, they still charged the customers. They also did not recall the products or even acknowledge that there was any kind of specific problem. We were simply told to alert the user that they needed to send the machine in and our repair center would take care of the rest.

  205. you're the problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wait wait wait...

    Now, you're happy because you talked to someone who told you to CLEAN THE DIRTY PRINT CARTRIGE?

    my time is worth more than that, I would have cleaned it myself BEFORE calling tech support.

    that's why tech support is so worthless -- it's designed to help people who can't wipe their own ass ^H^H^H print cartidge.

    sign

  206. Ad-Viewing? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    What ad-viewing?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  207. Or you could actually subscribe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's what I did. Salon is totally worth the $30 or whatever it was I paid. In fact, it's the only online content I've ever voluntarily paid for.

  208. Motivation of outsourcing companies. by Tekoneiric · · Score: 2, Informative

    Up till last November, I worked for an outsource company. The problem with these companies is that their not motivated to fix people, just make money off the call volume. They want their techs to rush and get the customer off as much as possible. They also will hire as few people as they can get away with to do the job and cross-cue people between contracts without the clients knowing. On my last contract, it was more like working directly for the client rather than the outsource company because of how the client interfaced with the techs and that the outsource company expected it to turn into a bigger contract, which didn't happen. They ended up closing the call center where I worked because the parent company wanted to reduce the number of call centers in the US. Basically the parent company bought the outsource company to raid them of profits thru the economic downturn. I heard recently that they want to sell the company now. It's all about the money...

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  209. Excellent luck with Applecare by BostonPilot · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I just wanted to put in a "job well done" plug for Applecare. Of course, Applecare costs a non-trivial amount ($350 or so, depending on the computer). I guess it's a question of you get what you pay for.

    First of all, the wait times are typically 2-5 minutes. I wish I could turn off the background music so that I could just leave it on speakerphone until it gets transferred, but 2-5 minutes a couple times a year strikes me as okay.

    Secondly, the TS specialists seem to know their stuff. They seem to have been well trained. I've been getting people in Austin... anyone know whether they are Apple empolyees or whether it is outsourced? I'd guess they are Apple employees, but I don't know for sure.

    In any case, I called them twice recently. The first call was because the email application started croaking a lot (once or twice a day). The technical support specialist was very knowledgeable, spent quite a bit of time with me discussing what it might be, etc. He actually listened to my theory that it was related to the junk-mail rules engine, pointed out how I could reset the rules engine, and that in fact seemed to solve the problem. It's nice when tech support will actually listen to your theories :-)

    The other call was because my laptop hard drive started making bad noises. I felt like they might have made me go through more steps than absolutely necessary (OS reinstall, disk-erase/OS reinstall) than absolutely necessary, but the trouble shooting they wanted me to do was not unreasonable. Also, they (after some persuading) were willing to send me a drive and let me replace it, rather than have to send them the laptop for a week (it's my everything-including-work computer, so it's tough to let it go for even a day, nevermind a week).

    All in all, I've never felt like they wasted my time, the stuff they ask me to try makes sense, and ultimately I've had my problems solved with a reasonable minimum of fuss.

    Applecare is not exactly cheap, but given that I tend to keep my Macs for 4-5 years, it's not an outrageous expense. I think other computer manufacturers could win some points with their customers by being more like Apple.

    1. Re:Excellent luck with Applecare by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Informative
      Of course, Applecare costs a non-trivial amount ($350 or so, depending on the computer). I guess it's a question of you get what you pay for.

      It's not a bad investment with their laptops, especially useful when you consider how much longer people hold on to Macs than do so with PCs, as you have said.

      They seem to have been well trained. I've been getting people in Austin... anyone know whether they are Apple empolyees or whether it is outsourced?

      The ones in Austin are actual employees. I've met a few, and I've also driven by there on trips to the main post office and seen the little Apple icons on the signs in front of the buildings.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  210. Wow. by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    Man, I didn't believe you until I copy pasted the link and saw it for myself.
    How pathetic.

  211. Good article by cove209 · · Score: 1

    I did 5 years of inhouse tech support and didn't see the level of abuse as detailed in the article but I have seen all these methods used at least once. I copied the article and saved it, please don't tell salon

  212. That's why 411 hangs up so fast by Uksi · · Score: 1

    A lot of people are mentioning the "numbers game."

    This may explain why when I call 411 on my cell phone, most of the time the reps hang up (redirect to the phone number) after I tell them "Yes, that's the one." As I'm opening my mouth to say "Can I have the exact address?", I hear the automatic "We are now placing a call to ..."

  213. Uh, at Sykes they do! by chadjg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The parent post said they don't ask you to work extra hours. Not at my old shop!

    A company Sykes had a contract with paid for butts-in-seats, not calls taken so the rampant absenteeism was killing the eend of year totals for the account. Guess who had to do overtime to make it up?

    A person who hasn't done this job before would say great, but that extra hour per day isn't worth it when you're almost homicidal at the end of the day on a normal schedule.

    And yes, at one time I could recite the entire fdisk menu and the restore sequence from memory. Damn e-machiens.

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  214. Proustian by Incognitius · · Score: 1

    Orwellian is wrong. Kafkaesque is apt. But I'd suggest "Proustian" as a more relevant literary analogy.

    Cites the OED:
    "A. POWELL Infants of Spring viii. 123 A lack of interest for individuals in what might be called the Proustian sense was perhaps characteristic, too, of the whole of the Arts Society."

  215. Re:Oversea tech support by trill+hellboinker · · Score: 1

    I can vouch for this - it's what we use. I can put down just about any ol crap on Dell's warranty parts form and the next day, out comes a tech with a part. Of course, this assumes that I've diagnosed it correctly. The only times I've ever had to tech support is when the tech didn't show or something like that.

    --
    Don't cry over spilt milk. It just makes it salty for the cat.
  216. 10-second ads by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
    Lots of cookies to filter, one of them to allow. That could be allowable, it's to be configured only once. But much more serious problem is their complete and blatant lack of support for non-graphics non-javascript browsers. For reading larger amount of texts I prefer Links, as I way too often do things over a terminal, and the console is more comfortable to read. Also, for the users of mobile devices who are connected over GPRS, graphics-loaded pages are expensive and slow.

    Remember that not everyone can use (or likes to use) GUI and that not everyone is on broadband.

  217. You can complain, or you can fix it. by djh101010 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We've all dealt with bad tech support. Many of us have had to _be_ tech support in a bad environment. It's not fun for us, it's not fun for the customer, and it's hard to keep good people in that kind of an environment.

    Rather than just whine about it, get yourself into a position to do something about it. I like digging into interesting calls, so I got a reputation for being kind of a Sherlock Holmes kind of character - the cool, interesting calls got conferenced to me. After a while, the "cool interesting calls" kept having the same questions over and over and over.

    I made a webpage with the most frequent problems our users had, and easy tests to check for them, with links of what to do to fix them. One test, for instance, uses Javascript to display the user's system time in a window on the webpage. This actually checks 3 things - are we a "trusted site", do they have javascript enabled, and is their clock accurate (check that year, guys) - any of which being wrong will prevent the user from using our financial data site.

    Make it easy - "Can you see the big red star? How about the small blue star?" First is served unencrypted, second has 128-bit or better encryption on it. If they can see one but not the other, "click here". If you can't see either, "click over here", that sort of thing.

    The number of BS calls I got from the first & second-level folks has dropped dramatically since I set this up - every once in a while I add another test (it's up to 7 or 8 now), and it's used a lot.

    Give the poor bastards in the call center the tools to fix it well _and_ quickly, and even the most pointy-haired of bosses should recognize that that's a good thing. Push it with a call-time reduction slant if they're that sort of boss, or if they actually give a spit about customers, use the customer-sat side of the argument. Or, you can just keep complaining about it...

  218. do you want fries with that? by decsnake · · Score: 1

    regular or supersize?

    1. Re:do you want fries with that? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      The green-card program will take care of those jobs because 'no american wants them.'

    2. Re:do you want fries with that? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      That should have been the blue-card program. Nothing wrong with the green-card program.

      opps.

    3. Re:do you want fries with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'm suprised McDonalds (et al) haven't moved more to mechanization in preparing their products. Beef patties can be stacked and 'dealt' by a machine onto individual griddles, and dumped down a chute to land on the bun(s). Then the condoments are squirted on, and the top of the bun lowered into place. The whole thing gets wrapped in paper, and slid down a chute into a bag ot onto a tray. Total human contact: 0%. (Except the people who load the machines.)

      It's gotta be cheaper, no?

  219. nobody should want these jobs... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    I guess that places like this would pay you to drop cow manure on customers' cars - it would after all be only slightly more destructive and slightly less helpful than their tech support. If there is money in the job, someone (whether in the US or elsewhere) will do these jobs and do them "well" (badly, but according to the company's desire). In some cases, after all, these are jobs of the "new economy" (the modern version of "getting a silk purse out of a sow's ear") and may be some of the few jobs available; in addition, they provide valuable training in the growing field of jobs (such as Enron accountant) where one can make lots of money while (or by) screwing your customers, investors, and/or employees. The incentives for people to take these jobs exist, so the fact that someone will do these jobs is unsurprising.

    The more relevant question is "Why is doing a bad job at a task (and hurting your paid customers) profitable?"

  220. Just subscribe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, you can just subscribe to Salon, too. It's like $3 a month (cheaper than a paper magazine, and with about 10 times more content), and with that comes special access to PDA/cellphone-formatted content, and PDF downloads of all content, with no ads on any of it.

    If you like Salon, just freakin' subscribe already.

  221. Re:Very smart people & numbers by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
    You say smart people have worked out what the optimum point between cost of tech support and losing clients is. I don't think so.

    What actually happens is alot of random guesses at what that point might be, and an evolutionary process whereby wrong guesses are punished by going out of business.

    Also, getting people to call back multiple times to rack up the number of calls at the expense of actually solving problems is an inneficient use of resources. Sure it lets the call company quote a price per call that is cheaper than the inhouse price per call, but think of the wasted time. Obviously, tech support should be focused on the goal of solving problems rather than getting the customer off the phone.

    If I were running a company and wanted to outsource tech support, I would require that each call get a ticket number, and that no ticket could be closed without the customer's permission. That way the call center would at least have an incentive to try to help the customer. However, measures would have to be taken to ensure that techs ( who would presumably be graded according to number of tickets closed ) didn't just punt anyone with a difficult problem. You might give the customer the opportunity to key in their ticket number when they call and also the opportunity to stay on hold for the same tech they talked to before, or just be assigned a random tech. Punting would still happen ( such as near the end of a shift, or in hopes that the customer would choose to get a random support tech, but this would help somewhat with punting.

    Customers are probably the best ones to police the quality of tech support actually provided by a call center outsourcer. If they were asked to rate the quality of service after each call from 1 to 9 where 1 is awful and 9 is adequate then quality could be assured. The calling center could be paid according to the following formula: NominalPricePerCall * NumberOfCallsTaken * ( AVG( Customer rating ) - 5 ). This would give irate customers the power to punish effectively costing the support company money.

    But this is not perfect either. The common case would be that the person is politely punted ( or tricked into beginning the formatting process ) and calls back having rated the first person highly only to find out from the random person they were assigned that they have deleted all their files. Now the customer rates the innocent tech who is stuck with the call badly out of anger rather than calling back and waiting on hold for an hour to put the blame on the person who deserves it. You could have the customer rate the resolution of a ticket rather than rate per call, but then you'd have punters benefiting from the problem solving skills of people who actually solve problems.

    The best solution might be to force a ticket to be handled all the way to completion by one tech so that the rating system is fair, but then you will have customers on hold for long periods.

    And of course all this costs money. If customers get fed up enough with bad tech support then they will buy from somewhere else.

    That's not likely though, because as bad as computer software/hardware can be, if it works for 80% of the people who buy it without them ever calling tech support, then by being slightly cheaper, that company will most likely garner 80% of market share over a competitor with better ( more expensive ) tech support. The minimal level of support that most companies give is the level that will not cause them to raise prices perceptably for the customer. So basically customers are left complaining about worthless almost-free support.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  222. Things are so bad that I don't use tech support by YllabianBitPipe · · Score: 1

    When I have a problem I go to the company's website first, then do a google search. Most times the problem has shown up on some user forum (Macfixit comes to mind) and someone else has a solution. I don't bother with tech support. I have nothing but time wasting experiences from them. Usually their answers revolve around "turn the product off for ten seconds, then turn it back on again" bullshit. If a product is so far gone it's not working and it's out of warrant, I buy a replacement rathern than deal with incompetent tech support ... and the replacement comes from a different company. Just like everything else in life, companies don't stand behind their products when they go bad. They're handing more and more of the "service" to the consumer themselves.

  223. Re:Oversea tech support by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    Negative, I am a meat popsicle.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  224. Re:Oversea tech support by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

    You're looking at decades when I'm talking about centuries. One might even suggest that the rising prices in Mexico are an example of this "evening out" trend in action.

    As it becomes cheaper to move things across borders (cars, knowledge), borders will cease to be an obstacle to trade (e.g. in cars and knowledge). This trend is only going to continue, it's not going to reverse. Take it to its logical conclusion and you find a world where all things that don't require proximity are fair game for those that aren't proximate.

  225. Wonderful... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    The first page of posts are arguing about the meaning of "punter".

    Christ, /. nerdies, get a life!

    Is it possible somebody might actually have something to relate about the ARTICLE (not that anybody actually read it of course, even though it was posted - this IS /., after all, I mean, c'mon, really, READ THE ARTICLE? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!)?

    Or the sorry state of tech support - in fact, customer support in general - in this country?

    Or are we just jacking off?

    I used to do support for a Bank of America in-house-developed cash management package for Fortune 1000 treasury managers. I actually tried to do my job. I once spent seven-and-a-half hours straight on the phone recovering a customer's data (they never backed up, natch) for a month when they lost it. Got a written letter of commendation from the customer.

    So what happened? Due to idiocy on the part of the Bank's managers, the package was trashed, everybody was laid off, and I got fired for blowing up at my supervisor (no unemployment, thanks).

    What does it all mean? (In the words of Mr. Miracle, "Don't mean sheeiiitttt!") It means corporate America could care less about its employees, its customers, or anything else except the individual manager's own income and authority.

    Which is a direct result of human nature.

    So I guess we just accept it. 'Cause it ain't gonna change. Ever.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  226. brilliant article by Krafty+Koder · · Score: 1
    Brilliant article. Thanks salon and /.
    I couldn't help feeling , when reading it, that there's a film script in there somewhere. All the different characters - the punters, the "santas" , charles, ken "total bullshit", the managers - were very memorable and very well described.

    Any film script based on this wouldn't be anything like "Office Space". It would be much more relentless, much more castigating, and much more pressurized. Alienation , pressure, stress and moments of humour thrown in.

    Think the adrenalin, energy, and mania of Boiler Room, meets the characters,humour and alienation of Office Space, in union with the sheer unadulterated white-collar anger of Falling Down.

  227. Sounds like a business plan to me by edremy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "For $25, I'll make that company know you're pissed!"

    Hey, it's better than selling pet food on the Internet.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  228. Stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is normal for Stream. I dealt with their people many times. Fortuantely I was on a reseller line and did not have to deal with tier one. Still, the scenario described in the article was quite accurate. What is worse, the Charlies of the world get recognition, while the REAL tech support people who take the TIME to fix the problem correctly the FIRST time, get punted.
    Management, IF it can be called that, are really a bunch of useless individuals, by and large. To paraphrase someone like H.L. Mencken, "Those who Can..Do! Those who Cannot, Manage."
    Just wait until you get Bubba Habib on the support line. He is a Charlie wannabe.

    To ALL you PC and peripheral manufacturers. LISTEN UP. This bullshit mentality you have concerning Support teams HAS TO STOP. We, as consumers, WILL find out who's products work best, and purchase those products. You who make shitty products will fade away. You will sit and wonder what caused your unemployment, but it is really two things, shitty products and Shittier support. Fuck you very much.

  229. Promotion based on how unhelpful you are? by Psyrg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That system is nuts.

    To make an analogy, the way these help desks currently promote their operators is like some sort of military promotion based upon how many bulletes a soldier has fired. It simply does not make sense.

    Why don't they add some sort of system where by the customer can rate the call? This could mean that unhelpful calls do not count towards your call statistics, and thus only useful people like Ken would get promotion.

  230. Century? Japan only took 25 years by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Japan went from abject poverty at the end of WWII to being a level competitor to the USA by 1970. the Yen went to throw-way currency to on par with the dollar in the same period. When India and China throw way the last remnants of their socialist straight-jackets, they could reach world levels in less than a generation.

    1. Re:Century? Japan only took 25 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the japanese are industrious and smart. The indians are mediocre and too consumed of religion.

  231. He forgot one important tech support type by heinzkeinz · · Score: 1

    He forgot one important tech support type: the CMOS drainer.

    'Hmmm, sir, it seems like the best solution is for you to drain your CMOS. Do that, and call back in 40 mins if it's still not working.'

  232. A Call Center by Any Other Name... by Macblaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work at a telemarketing firm. Yes it meant that i hated myself, but college is expensive, but the money can be really really good if you make commission.

    Our employment video showed a happy cheerful place where people were genuinely interested in a new credit card, or some entertainment club, or identity theft protection. Every person had their own cubical, with computer and phone, and the entire call center looked like some upscale human resources department.

    My call center was dirty. Dirty isnt really a strong enough word to describe it, but lets just say that people got excited when they had the little moist towelettes to wipe down the keyboards, which had years of god only knows what encrusted on the keys. The fabric on the chairs were stained horribly, like someone's pet had gotten loose and had some fun.

    You would go in around 9:00, put on the headset, and log into the computer, which were running Windows 98 with some specialized dialer software. A name would flash on screen. The instant that name popped up, the person had already said "Hello" at least once. Meaning, no time to attempt to figure out pronunciation... "Hello, Mr. Fhqwhgads please."
    Assuming that you are close enough to the proper pronucniation that they dont slam the phone down in disgust, you must seek permission to continue. This is required by law. How is this circumvented? The magic word is "okay".

    Never, ever, ever, ever ask a question without phrasing it so that the last word is "okay". That is one of the fundamentals. "I'm calling from *******, and i know you're probably busy, but i just want to take a quick moment of your time, okay?" If they dont say "no" or something similar immediatly following that, then you have legal permission to continue. You start your schpeil. The trick is to say it as quickly as possible, outline benefits, and explain to this person who is already way over their head in debt why they want a new credit card just because of the balance transfers. The script itself is like a choose your own adventure. For early interrupts, there are a series of retorts for you to choose from. You must respond to early interrupts. Once you have outlined benefits, you use a line similar to "i know this is a great deal that can really help you out, so after a quick confirmation and approval, we can have this card out to you in a few weeks, okay?" If they say they are not interested here, you must use no less than 2 second efforts, which outline other benefits that you didnt mention before. Long before you actually get to go through with the second efforts, the "customer" has already hung up, but this is of no concern to the managers, who walk around the room listing in on each "Tele-Service Representitive"'s calls.

    The managers are the ones who can convince Neil Armstrong that he never walked on the moon. They speak fast, and they speak clear. Using a form of mind control that is perfected from years of being a telemarketer, when most people normally get 6 sales a day, these guys made 12. They throw around the word "okay" like nobody's business, because they know that the mind's first instinct when it hears "okay?" is to respond with "okay."

    Being a telemarketer wasnt about finding people who actually need a service, and making it available to them. The right person for the deal is whoever you are talking to, and its your job to make them realize that.

    It was a stressful job, and one that i hope ill never have to go back to again. Getting an ulcer by age 18 should say something about a job. Besides, being a male prostitute would be far less dirty. Maybe the moral of this story is that the concept of the telephone is out dated. I can type faster than i talk anyway...

  233. Dell is so bad you can game their system. by raygundan · · Score: 1

    Last year, I bought a 512MB CF Card on sale from Dell for about $80. They lost the order altogether-- no record in their system of my number. So I asked them to place the order again at the sale price, but they wouldn't without proof.

    So I hung up and called back. Tried the business number. Bounced around between reps a little, and ended up with a "giver." Apparently unable to even check pricing information, the tech actually had *me* look up the price online. She then credited the difference in price to a *previous order* (so that she had a credit card number to hang it on) and told me to re-order the card from their website.

    As is traditional for Dell, the card went back on sale a few days later. I ordered it, and ended up getting the card and making a $20 profit.

    The reps are so confused and without information you can tell them nearly anything. They don't care, and just want you gone. It's amazing anyone is still even bothering to offer support-- utterly worthless. But at least you can get your revenge by getting some of your wasted time back in the form of money and free stuff.

  234. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this article is about a US call center, outsourced within the US. so shut your trap. thank you.

  235. 10 minute call limit = lousy support, 'mkay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading that article makes me realize things aren't so bad in my corner of the tech support world. I manage a small support center for a software company. We aren't under contract but actually work directly for the company. We don't enforce any kind of time limit on calls. We encourage techs to try to keep call times down but don't penalize or reward based on call times. The emphasis in on actually trying to understand and resolve a customer's problem to the point that they do not have to call back. It seems to me the 10-minute limit, combined with outsourcing to companies who are paid per call, is the factor which skews the incentive system so badly as to create the opposite of good technical support. Our department does have its problems and limits (disrespected by other departments, no accountability from the developers means bugs never get fixed or even looked at, lack of resources means we cannot provide support for everything we want to, no time for training or very in-depth troubleshooting, etc.), but employee turnover is actually not bad (some people have been here over 5 years) and our customers often give us glowing praise and thanks. It seems that other companies have set the bar so low on tech support that people are very pleasantly stunned when they get a human being on the phone who effectively helps them solve a problem in just a few minutes.

  236. Re:Nothing new here... BULL*$@# ! by neonduckshoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First I'd like to say that I agree with everything you've said. But... I am compelled to play devil's advocate for a moment. If you have no concept of how a computer works, and how data is stored...perhaps that is not the medium on which you should be keeping your most treasured family memorabilia. Similarly, if you have no concept that running VHS cassettes throw a chipper/shredder makes it so the moving pictures of grandma are gone forever...home movies are not for you.

  237. Re:Taken care of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you did mod someone down in this thread as soon as you posted here your mod points would have been rescinded. If you had read the moderation guidelines you'd know that.

  238. Re:I don't get it. Dell is famous for crap support by edremy · · Score: 1
    They're cheap and nobody else is any better.

    As far as I can tell, the American consumer makes buying decisions on exactly two things

    1. Price. Cheaper is always better.
    2. Prestige. There's no other way to explain Prada handbags and Mercedes SUVs.

    Yes, there are exceptions, but Service doesn't seem to ever enter the equation, with the occasional Nordstrom's being the exception to prove the rule.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  239. Re:Nothing new here... BULL*$@# ! by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gosh...I hope you don't work in tech support.

    I wish more new users knew to reject the formatter, but most don't and then they wonder where their e-mail is at. Responding that users should know better is almost as bad as the formatter telling them that reformatting will fix everything.

    --

    Gorkman

  240. Re:Nothing new here... BULL*$@# ! by neonduckshoe · · Score: 1

    I'm not letting the formatter off the hook; I actually find that behavior to be abhorent. I'm simply stating that this is a consequence of putting complete faith in a technology you don't understand...

  241. Programming job market isn't bad by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Interesting
    No. But any assembly coder worht his salt would have been able to learn C or COBOL back in the day. He still has his local job available to him.

    Right. Just like any GOOD programmer today, whose job is in danger of being outsourced, can learn SOME skill that hasn't been filled by millions of people from third world nations. It will always be that way, and it's why only the more underskilled have to worry about job loss on a protracted basis.

    This isn't meant to be a personal attack, but could you please, in your wisdom, tell us what a guy is supposed to do when his whole industry moves to India or China?

    And please don't just say retrain.

    Hey, no offense taken, and I don't mean the following as an attack either, but...sorry, retrain or become better at what you (by which I mean a general audience 'you') actually do. And the whole industry isn't moving. Companies are hiring skilled college grads, and nearly every job I'm looking at requires programming experience. And they're not based in Bangalore, either. Much of the problem is that a lot of programmers here only know how to program, and more and more this level of programming is being outsourced.

    I would say your problem is NOT Indians - it's skilled Americans in other fields who can program just as well. People similar to me who program better - I'm an adequate, not great, coder, but I will soon have a Ph.D. in chemistry. These days, programming is good for accenting a skill set, but isn't sufficient alone. In other words, the people in demand are scientists who program well, finance people who program well, etc. But it's not people who are expert at standard CS group theory algorithms and the like, because it's expected that a programmer can pick that up if they need it. My advice to people majoring in CS is this: double major in finance or a phyisical/life science. You will have to beat companies, American companies, away with a stick.

    Oh yeah, did the 'retrain and get a better job' theory work for all those poor souls who lost their manufacturing jobs in the 70's 80's and 90's? Using this as an example, personally I'm afraid for my future.

    I'm glad you bring that up. And are all those "poor souls" currently unemployed? No. They're not. Because they, for the most part, successfully retrained. And certainly our economy is better for it.

    Also, don't be afraid for your future if you're competent. For what it's worth, the times during which a person would enter the work force and perform a single job for 40 years are long dead. Technical fields change so fast that, if you don't keep up, you're an irrelevant dinosaur. And I mean that inclusively - if *I* don't keep up with my field, I will likewise become a relic. That's the way it is these days, and that excitement and novelty is why we choose the fields we do, I expect.

    Let's put it this way. Lots of people bitch and moan about outsourcing, but what's the alternative? Make sure that menial labor is done in the US? Make sure that we can't compete with other countries? I mean, when you put this in historical context, it's ridiculous. Labor markets evolve. We have to deal with it, or become unemployed. Hate to be harsh, but that's the way it is.

    1. Re:Programming job market isn't bad by Coltman · · Score: 1

      I would have to say that A mod of + 2 is too low because you are absolutly right. This is a dynamic field and one has to be ready to be more dynamic than ever to keep up...to a point. A person can only be so dynamic before burnout happens. Stability is needed at some point.

      This statement bothers me:
      Much of the problem is that a lot of programmers here only know how to program, and more and more this level of programming is being outsourced

      I think that you are backwards in that lots of people know how to write programs but do not know how to program. And it is the programmers that are keeping the jobs here. And the writing of code that is being outsourced.

      I personally am not afraid of losing anything I have been working towards what I am doing since I was 6 years old. Love what I do and will continue to learn and keep doing what I do until the day I just am not allowed to do it anymore.

      --
      - my $.02? - you can't have it...it's all I have!!
    2. Re:Programming job market isn't bad by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1
      Make sure that menial labor is done in the US?

      (note: the tone is done in jest, but the questions are real)

      Why not? Why is it better for some brownskin to be sewing your clothes for $.10 an hour than some Amurcan?

      Make sure that we can't compete with other countries?

      Sure we can. Put all those homeless and welfare people to work! By working for American Corporations at less than $.50/hr we'll not only bring jobs back to America, but we'll reduce unemployment and get rid of welfare!

      Labor markets evolve.

      I guess. But what I see happening is this: corps move overseas to save money and then charge the same amount for their product/service to a bunch of people who don't have a job anymore. This seems like an unsustainable cycle. Not to go off on a tangent, but all the extra profits go into making the rich richer and screwing the health of the country's economy.

      The thing is: Why can those people live on those salaries? Because the cost of living is so much less. Why? Because food, services, housing, etc. cost much less (the wages of the people producing them are much less). Why can't we live on the same salary? Because things are more expensive here, due to the wages of the Americans making the product/service being higher. So, if Americans aren't getting paid high salaries to produce these products, how can companies keep charging Americans high prices for them? It seems like we'll just be funneling most of the US currency to big corporations that take it in from Americans but give (very little of) it back out overseas.

  242. Anyone surprised support jobs are moving to India? by teutonic_leech · · Score: 1

    I haven't read all the responses on this thread, but I couldn't help but wonder - is anyone surprised that tech support jobs are moving to India? I've had my share of stints with customer support personnel who I wound up educating (and I felt like an idiot afterward) - up to the point that I just don't call customer support anymore. Unless it's a small company of course where I know who's doing tech support and I can drive down the street and kick his hiny if necessary ;-)

    But all violent urges when dealing with tech support personnel aside - if that greedy attitude is the standard out here in the U.S. - then we shouldn't complain about those jobs wandering off to India. I'd rather have some guy with a 7/11 accent answer my call and try to help me out then to simply have my time blatantly wasted. That's the problem in this country, everyone is so busy finding ways to undercut the next guy and putting one's hand into someone else's pocket - it just goes down the line until the lowest bitter is someone is Mombay (formerly Bombay).

    We all thought that pure greed and lack of integrity is commonly accepted now and that's just the law of the land. Well, guess what? There are repercussions to all actions (good or bad) and maybe you doing a crappy job today or some company just focusing on the bottom-line will cause a snowball effect in the long run. Can't find a job for over six months now? Maybe it's that type of mentality that caused the dotcom bubble to burst in the first place. And obviously, reading reports such as this, people have still not learned their lesson, and it's 'business as usual'. Corporate America is a piece of turde - I'd probably feel better working as a male actor in p0rn movies than to live through one day as depicted in this article.

  243. wpi slang... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've also seen it used to mean give up.

    round here, "punting" a class means you've given up all hope of passing. typically implying that one stops attending and doesn't bother with the final.

  244. Good story about IBM tech support... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    I recently received from my work an old IBM NetStation Type 8361 (110) that I wanted to figure out how to get going under Linux. Doing a little googling and research, I found out that this was possible, but that to get it fully functioning, you had to download and install a special server daemon that IBM supplied. The FAQ/HOW-TO I found listed some links, but they were 404'ed. Searching on IBM's site would bring up info on current NetStation models, but nothing on the older stuff. I decided to try to see if their tech support would help.

    Now, in my experience, most of the time when you ask companies about an old and outdated product, they just say "sorry, not supported anymore". Doubly so if you didn't buy it from them, or got it used somehow. Especially if it is a rather niche market that didn't bear out (ie, enterprise-wide network diskless workstations from the late 90's). I expected just such a response from IBM - that, or they wouldn't tell me because I didn't have a service contract or something with them.

    Imagine my surprise when a few days later I got an email stating where the software, and all of the documentation (PDF format) was located at - for two different service updates. The software consisted of a tar.gz file and an ISO of TurboLinux 7.0 (though supposedly the installer for the software will work for other distros of the period as well - but you still need the TL distro because it downloads some piece from it when installing). I have yet to try it out, but I am surprised I got a response at all!

    Now I am praying I will get something close to that support when I receive a Virtuality HMD I got off of eBay (now, this is a loooongshot) - hopefully cyberminds.uk will help, plus I am hoping to get some support from polhemus on an old ISA tracking card and sensor that is coming with the HMD (I don't think I am getting the transmitter for the tracker - so I am hoping to dig one up some other way).

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  245. Re:Nothing new here... BULL*$@# ! by taernim · · Score: 1

    Formatters are too lazy to actually work to get things done. Similarly, I would have read the rest of your comment, but...

    --
    "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
  246. Re:Who is behind UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, this post brings back fond memories of my own days doing technical support for UPS. I was a punk 18 year old kid and no one knew the wiser.

    In actuality UPS technical support is usually handled by the outsourcing company MicroAge (they do some AT&T too). There were three facilities at one point, and let me tell you something that we verified: Technical support from Santa Monica sucks. Hard. Bad. They are the worst. Neveda was second, and Arizona was best. Which went first? Arizona of course.

    Well, signed an NDA, no names. I remember once getting a completely irate man in his 50's screaming at me and crying that he was sick of our BS and wanted a real person live on site in an hour.

    I looked up his problem log. Sure enough, the techies in Cali *knew* what his problem was but didn't want to sacrifice call time. So instead of dialing in and just fixing it (a 10 minute process) they escalated it to onsite repair, which would be a 5 hour delay.

    Meanwhile, this guy is shipping hundreds of parcels and is frozen solid. I look to see why onsite never showed: they rejected it (and they totally have this right) on grounds that one of the call centers could do it quicker.

    So I explained to him what happened, and struck a deal with him. If he gave me 10 minutes I would fix it, if I went over, I'd have onsite out there even if I had to drive myself.

    Took 15 minutes. He joked with me about it, asked for my manager, and I got a nice little "Customer Satisfaction Award."

    Of all of my tech work experience though, MicroAge was the best - they focused on their call evaluation system instead of the calltime. We could flux between 20 minutes and 1 hour calls without any raised eyebrows. 3 hours and they just felt sorry for you. Of course, people under 20 who scored high on evaluations moved along much faster.

    I liked the system.

    -A Coward

  247. Re:Oversea tech support by Explet1ve! · · Score: 1
    Actually, the whole globalization trend will suffer an abrupt reversal in the next few years (at the latest by 2010).

    Globalization is made possible by cheap energy, because labor costs are so much higher than the energy costs of shipping products around the globe (I'm talking about goods, not services here).

    However, we are rapidly approaching global peak output in oil, as more and more countries go from oil exporters to oil importers, and everyone leans more and more on OPEC to produce the oil.

    Oil production will peak very soon and then decline by 3% a year. This will cause a radical realignment of our economic systems, and local products will trump global products just due to the energy it takes for shipping.

    Don't believe? Just enter in "peak oil" in google, there are dozens of websites devoted to this. Many of these websites contain articles written by retired oil scientists which warn of the peak in oil production by 2010, 2020 if we are really lucky.

    Facts:

    Fact: US oil discoveries peaked in 1930
    Fact: US production peaking in 1970
    Fact: World oil discoveries peaked in 1964
    Fact: World oil production will peak (or has already peaked) any day now
    Fact: We used to pump 50 barrels of oil for every 1 barrel of oil energy equivalent invested
    Fact: We now pump 5 barrels of oil for every 1 barrel of oil energy equivalent invested
    Fact: The last major oil field discovery was in the 1970s
    Fact: Natural gas will also peak, but lag gasoline peak
    Fact: There is no substitute for oil that either 1) won't take a long time to bring on line 2) won't pollute horribly

    So, if suddenly sneakers made in China cost $300 because of the shipping costs, suddenly US made sneakers costing $100 look pretty good.

    80% of the people who bother to read this post will say "This is total bullshit -- we will never run out of oil, there's plenty of it left" -- What are you basing your beliefs on? That it has always been there, so it will always be here? Oil companies paint a rosy picture otherwise their stocks will crash, the government does the same to prevent a panic, and the main media doesn't want to spread anything the suggests the coming doom of multinational corporations. How many McDonald's hamburgers will you be able to eat if they cost $50 a piece?

    World oil reserves have been pegged at 2000 Gbarrels for many decades. Suddenly, recently, the USGS changed it to 3000 Gb. Was there some incredible new find? (We have pumped about 900 Gb since the beginning of time, we have about 1100 Gb left in the ground) No, the revised numbers reflect DEMAND in oil. In other words, the USGS changed the estimate of reserves so that they can continue to say "we have X years of oil left".

  248. Just like the country asshats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who dont know what vegitarian means. I hate to order in them taco bells driving south on I95 to florida. Does "fish" sound like a plant to you or do chicken/caviar/ribs ? You are a meatbot too pal.

  249. (OT- sig) I think the answer is BOTH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people doing stupid things to the environment aren't selective - thus things dumped into one part may end up near me someday. More likely, of course, is that the people who felt free to dump their waste somewhere else will feel free to dump it near me.

    The environment is like freedom - none of it is free if it is under attack anywhere, because if bad things (loss of freedom or environment) could happen somewhere, they can also happen where you are. If people have the power to do bad things elsewhere, there is the potential/likelihood that they will be able to use that power where you live.

    I may be misinterpreting - the "developers want houses in the woods - environmentalists already have them" things has also been around awhile...

  250. Re:Tech Support for some large company (true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    The only call center for this department of theirs is in Austin.

    I know someone who used to work there, supporting a rather popular hardware product of theirs that people try to run free operating systems on. (I always thought it was rather foolish of them to include moving parts in this product.) A few months ago she got a job with the school district working with "special" students. I told her that she should be happy because she was now working with a higher class of customers.

  251. My experiences at Sympatico by elfguy00 · · Score: 1

    I worked for a Sympatico outsourcer and while not as bad as this article, I saw very similar things. What drives people away is not the calls but the targets. Average call time must be as low as possible, you have to follow pre-written scripts even if you know it's not going to solve the problem, if you don't know it's better to tell them it's not supported than to call and wait on hold for the second tech support line.

  252. Oh Boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just bought a laptop from them last month,"

    Sucker.

    HP Laptops were lame. Compaqs were worse. Ironically, now that they're combined, you get a product that is much worse than either combined.

    These new laptops combine bulkiness and weight with an astouding lack of speed and poor battery life. I'll bet that you couldn't hit that particular combination purely by chance.

    I guess that's called "Synergy".

  253. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You will get put in the crank list of a lot of magazines"

    Why will that be bad? Does it go on my "permanent record"?

  254. Re:What's the solution? How can we take their mone by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    The best market opportunity that exists right now is to create your own local shop which provides highly competent charge-by-the-hour technical support for other company's products and services.

    People haul their PC's into your shop, or you send your knowledgeable support people out to people's homes. If you fix the problem, then you charge the customer based on time spent helping them. If you don't fix the problem, the customer pays nothing. Therefore you have built-in motivation right there to track both time-efficiency AND problem resolution, with problem resolution being of primary importance.

    The face-to-face/hands-on/in-person aspect to this is very important, as the reality of technical support is that it's just not possible to do it over the phone and rely on uneducated customers to do the actual work. You have to get someone knowledgeable on the actual problem, dealing with it directly.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  255. True about dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I always hear it from people that tech support doesn't help at all. Then why do you buy from those companies and not from some local shop were you get support in person? Cause dell offers phone tech support. ARGH."

    My sister bought a dell. Wouldn't boot one night, so she was on the phone for a god-damned hour. They had her remove the fucking motherboard. This from a woman who could hurt herself with a phillip's head.

    At the end of the call, they said she needed a new motherboard, she must have burned it out (???), and that it would be $350.

    Wow.

    She bought another computer and gave me the old one. What was clear was:

    a) In putting it back together, my sister seemed to be less competent than the dell tech support.

    b) more to the point, it was obvious in 10 seconds the hard drive had crashed. It wouldn't even come ready. This should have been obvious except the most clueless and tech support I guess.

    c) I put in a cheapie HD I had (80G), and now I have a perfectly competent server in the basement.

    So you can see I'm ambivalent about Dell tech support.

  256. It is bad for india by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the ability for a company to move quickly and easily from one country to another takes away the only real powers workers have: Unions and the strike. Something everyone in the US seems to forget is people died for the 40 hour work week. In the past, when people tried to unionize and stike they were dealt with brutally. The violence against them generated sympathy and helped their cause. Now, the company just leaves. No violence, no messy protests, no flashy news stories. Just a dead town. That's why you're not hearing about any great labor movements in India even though they treat their workers like dirt.

    Global capitalism screws everyone except the capitalists.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  257. ME AM DUBM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Who needs support for long-distance phone service?"

    People who pay 7 figures, ie call centers, large companies.

    Please try to read before parading your ignorance.

    1. Re:ME AM DUBM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, what's reading?

      I work at a company with 6 call centers. Yes we have to manage 2 or 3 telco vendors, but WHO NEEDS SUPPORT FOR LONG DISTANCE SERVICE?

    2. Re:ME AM DUBM! by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Uh huh, my neighbor washes toilets for a company that makes rockets. That doesn't make him an rocket scientist. You either, for that matter.

      LD Tech Support and circuit inventory management. Eat me.
      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  258. Re:Nothing new here... BULL*$@# ! by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

    If you are a Formatter, please find a new line of work- TODAY.

    easier said than done. One day I was working as a sys-admin at a software company the next I was working at Stream. I survived for two years - the entire time I was looking for a new job. Finally a friend recomended me at another call center that pays more. If he hadn't I'd probably still be working there. Frankly I had no-where else to go. No savings, no place of my own etc.

    I would think the companies using these "Support Centers" will suffer for their callous disregard for their customers.

    you would but you'd be wrong. Sure Dell, Gateway, HP might become disgusted with the performance of a certian call center, but they'll just move to another. Again - while I was at Stream we picked up more than one contract from Sykes, ACS and the like from more than one disgrunteled company.

    Oddly enough the pattern is the same for each contract - spend the first year making the client happy - around then start imposing draconian rules. For example (and I'm not making this up) fixing complex problems in a certian very famous graphics program made by a company in san jose in 14 minutes with 15 seconds to wrap your notes. You start saying things like "you're windows is broken" and "there's really nothing we can do here".

    Ever wonder why HP techs try to sell support solutions on every call? They will be fired if they don't. You lose most all your points on a call monitoring - you could be the most brilliant tech on earth and be fired for not trying to sell extended contracts.

    Really though if it wasn't for stream I wouldn't have got the job I have now since they wanted call center support. I've got 10,000+ calls of that.

  259. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spot on! This is exactly right. I was laid off in November of 2001 because of massive budget cutbacks. Who did they keep? The foreigners. All of us americans were laid off, while they (for the most part) stayed on. It is hard not to be angry at these people, even when I was friends with many of them, and knew it wasn't because of them.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Skapare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I certainly encourage you and everyone else to focus your anger on the companies, corporate executives, and their stockholders, who are always trying to screw people over just for profits. Indians are just as much victims of this, if not more so. If these companies could find a way to do absolutely everything in a foreign country ultra cheap, or even on Mars, they would. And don't forget that Bush, Cheney, and many Republicans are in bed with these corporations. Use your vote in 2004 wisely.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  260. Not Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell's support is not like this.

    Dell uses quality metrics to measure support services - NOT just quantity. The bonus for every employee in the company (not just the support/call center people) is tied to these quality metrics.

  261. Tech support, not wat it used to be by enrayged · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work at Gateway before thier stocks got flushed down the toilet. I worked at the call center in Rio Rancho, started there about a month after they opened (was part of the second class of techs to hit the floor) and watched our call center go through many stages. When I first started there, we were all about getting everyones problems fixed the first time every time. Call time was important but if you were solving problems, without messing around, then there wasn't any problems. THey were focused on quality not quantity. The year I started Gateway was named #1 by pc magazine for tech support. Everyone was proud and excited to be working for such a company. It was not uncommon to spend the entire day with one client to get certian problems fixed (was rare and only for strange and unique circumstances but it did happen).

    Slowly and gradually, things started getting worse and worse. I was gradual enough that we didnt actually notice it at first... basically the frog in boiling water. They started getting tighter and tighter on calltimes, slowly lowering the maximum time. The reason we were given was that before we were running more like a help desk than a tech support call center. I personally didnt see much of a difference, both set up to help people with thier problems. We of course didnt support everything, no 3rd party hardware or software. But they slowly started limiting our scope of support.

    Then Ted Waitt stepped down and Jeff Weitzen was named CEO. Talk about going to hell in a hand basket. I dont think it was personally Weitzen's fault, but I could be wrong. All of a sudden we werent a call center, we were a cost center, as we cost money to operate instead of generating revenue for the company. They set up pay support lines for the more obscure stuff and stuff we normally didnt handle. They gave everyone scripts to follow. A lot of us had been there 2-3 years at that point and knew these systems inside and out and could fix problems faster than tier flowsheets allowd us. However, if we didnt follow these guidelines we were punished. Written up, yelled at, etc. By this time I was working laptops, and we had a max call time of about 7 and a half minutes. I think standard desktop support was at about 12 or 13, cant quite remember. I was also working with home networking (anyone remember hpna cards?) so I had a little repreive.

    They came up with the great idea of lets have tech support sell people stuff when they finish thier calls. I thought that was a totally bogus idea as before if they needed something like more memory or a bigger hard drive we would just transfer them over to the sales dept. for a quick and easy commisioned sale. Now they were expecting us to sell stuff to people that didnt need it. We didnt get commision, but we had numbers to hit. Now as most of you know, Tech support people dont always make good sales people. I was only able to sell extended warranties when the 1 year (used to be 3 year) warranties were over, and the occasional memory upgrade and hard drive, if it was justified that they really could use one. My manager would get on to me about more sales. I told him that I felt cheap and dirty making sales, as these people trusted us much more than sales, as sales people are there to make a sale and nothing more, but we were there to help them. He said, exactly. They are more open to sales from you because they arent expecting a sale from you. You should be pushing everything you can at them. Well of course that didnt go over very well with me, but at the same time they did a restructuring of the que's

    With the que restructure, I now sat idle for hours at a time as I was one of about 12 people in all of gateway (at least in the US) that was still on the home networking que. (The rest were smart enough to get out... at about the time that Gateway outsourced thier IT department) So, I wouldnt take any other calls unless the other ques were hopelessly backed up, but that was rare as if you didnt have wicked fast calltimes you

  262. take off your blinders by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, the ad in question (some flash monstrosity flogging GE's water purification tech. I guess they want us to forget they also make nuclear weapons? *shrug*) crashes my browser like a three ton male cow with BSE being dropped from the top of the empire state building onto a porcelain establishment. So i've watched their fucking advert twice, vainly hoping that I'd get to read the content. No such luck, and I even happen to be using a gui browser with flash. So thanks to the efforts of a fellow slasher/ette I can read the article.


    Just think, if I was blind and using a braille device, that kind person's effort would be the only think letting me read the article. Forced delay ads authored in a proprietary plugin environment are almost criminally stupid given the recent legislation regarding web accessibility.

    Oh, and feel sorry for commercial entities trying to make old-tech biz models survive in the digital realm? Hahahahahaha. Fuck them and their cretinous, heavy-handed attempts to make the web like teevee. The net was such a nice place until the suits showed up to whore it out.

  263. Re:2 cents and 2 more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the tech was lucky, he got a whole $13 of that $35.

  264. I think you misunderstood. by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    I understand that other haven't worked tech support and that normal people have problems with computers. My point is this isn't new news, check google, people were saying tech support was crap just like this 10-15 years ago.

    1. Re:I think you misunderstood. by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is the sort of thing that people just google for. Few of us sit around and wonder if tech support was so crappy 15 years ago, though I agree that you're right. It's news because somebody wrote a good story about it. :)

  265. National TechTeam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another winner of a company, HQ in Southfield Michigan. 2nd level support? A bald middle aged cocksucker selling pot on the side, a bunch of affirmative action types that couldn't find their fucking asses with both hands and a fucking mirror, and a 'project manager' that was sucking the dope dealer's dick when she wasn't fucking shit up. Absolutely the worst place ever to work, but a godsend to the hundreds of otherwise unemployable convicts/criminals/cocksuckers/motherfuckers/cunts that they foisted upon their CORPORATE HELP DESK customers as 'trained computer professionals.'

  266. Phone companies are always fun... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    Two apartments ago, my roomates and I wanted to get DSL. We called Verizon, give them our phone number, and the operator "hmms" for a while and then asks "Do you have fiber on the line?"

    I had to resist the urge to go "HOW THE HECK SHOULD I KNOW, YOU'RE THE FREAKIN PHONE COMPANY?

    Not to mention that to someone who doesn't know anything about networking, the word fiber makes one think of breakfast cereals that induce pooping.

  267. Fun with call distribution software running on NT by netnerd.caffinated · · Score: 2, Funny

    I used to work for an undisclosed ISP in Australia.
    Whilst working there, we got a new call/distribution/PABX system which used TAPI & run on NT, so we could watch the queues from software on our desktop.
    It didn't take long to figure out that if you DoS attacked the NT box, the whole queueing system would go down! no more calls! it took them bout 4 months to fix it ..

    --


    You tried your best, & you failed miserably,
    The lesson is:
    Never Try
  268. Your missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason tech support is so bad is that a certain percentage of users will just give up and buy another computer. It works fine as long as all the vendors work the same

  269. Keep this in mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm whoring for Promise Technology"

    Well, I want you to repeat something:

    "RAID 0 means I don't give a shit about my data"

    repeat

    "RAID 0 means I don't give a shit about my data"

    Raid 0 is only useful in a 0+1 configuration. a 0 configuration says "Please destroy my data".

    1. Re:Keep this in mind... by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use the Supertrak SX6000 in a raid 5 configuration. Stupid moron (me), never backed up the RAID config on the controller. So when the controller failed, I thought I was out 100+ GB of data.

      Turns out that Promise stores array information on the disks themselves, so if you plug them back in order (disk0 on raid ide0, etc.) it boots the array just fine. My scream of joy nearly blew the roof off (after spending 3 days getting LVM working with SuSE 8.2 and the pti_st.o Promise Driver... fucking SuSE installer...

      Needless to say, I'm continually dumbfounded by the inclusion of RAID 0... <sigh>

      Mmm... 0+1, 4 disks to get reliable fast performance that I could have gotten by buying Seagate Cheetah's and SCSI... for the same price. yeah. :-)

  270. ClientLogic by torklugnutz · · Score: 1

    I worked for these guys in Vegas, on the Dell campaign. It was almost as if I'd written the article myself. Our call times were set at 17.5 minutes though. I don't think I ever hit that. I can remember one time, talking to some sexy sounding lady on the phone for 3 hours. I sat on the phone with her and chatted while her hard drive formatted. (this was back in the Win98 days when format/reinstall was more viable than in today's carefree world of system restore) The trick I learned for getting call times down was to hang up on the customer and call them back, since only incoming calls were part of the average.
    I'd never do that job again. It was soul sucking. Money wasn't bad, $10 an hour, but it wasn't great. Benefits were decent. I got my wisdom teeth pulled. I even got my little "Dell Certified Technician" diploma.
    The big thing with punting and giving, where I worked was that calls were monitored. My friend got fired for sending out a set of speakers without going through the whole set of TS webpages Dell had set up. We had an "ownership" policy. Once you get a call, you own it. If that means you have to call them back later, or tomorrow, or whatever, that was your job. Like I said, call-backs didn't hurt your time. The last thing was the rate of first-call resolution. It was said to be really bad if you had a customer call back within a day of you punting them. However, the whole tracking system for that broke, never to be fixed in my 6 months of working there. So, it was a vacant threat that some people (the ones with the low call times and big bonuses) took advantage of.
    Having worked on the other side of the phone, and currently working as an onsite tech, I kind of know how to deal with the schmucks on the other end. I never say that I'm a tech or that I used to be one of them. I just wait for them to start trying to give me the run around, then I lay into them. So far, it's worked all but once, when a tech put me back into the tech support queue.

    --
    Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
  271. Call Center Mecca by Ranger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tulsa, Oklahoma is a call center mecca. It also has the second worst job market after San Jose, CA. Among Tulsa's 80 call center firms are DecisionOne, West, US Cellular, Cingular, Metris, Dollar, Thrifty, and Avis. They can be extremely unpleasant places to work. Most are outsourcers for other major companies, so it doesn't do the workers any good to unionize. The primary company would pull the contract. These jobs pay from $7 to $12/hour. Most are in the $8-9/hr range. Call center jobs have notoriously high turnovers. Employee careers are measured in weeks, possibly months. With the economy sucking so bad, they can be measured in years now.

    Oklahoma is like a third world country. So big ass companies don't outsource your low paying shit jobs to India or China send them to Oklahoma. They have more high school edumacated people than West Virginia, Arkansas, and Missippi combined! And the cost of doing business is low.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  272. Problem with tech support by stove · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fundamental problem with tech support is that:
    1. The people who call in, by and large, are not computer literate nor very good at troubleshooting. (Troubleshooting in this case being the ability to reduce the problem to "when I do X, Y happens") So they are frustrating to work with. Problems that, were you at their PC, would be solved in seconds take 12 minutes.
    2. No one with any level of skill or communication ability wants to work on the phones, because users tend to not be computer literate nor good at troubleshooting.
    3. Users with a level of technical ability and skill don't want to call in for support, because they know they'll hit a script reader who won't be able to solve their problem. So they check on the Internet or ask friends to solve their problems. So the only users who call are less experienced users, which brings us back to point 1.

    How to break this cycle? I'm not sure. I will point out the computers seems to be a rare instance where an untrained person is expected to be able to perform sometimes complicated operations only by voice instruction. Would you call the manufacturer of your transmission for help "over the phone" in installing it in your car? Of course not - it's understood this is a complicated operation that needs to be performed by a professional in order for things to work correctly. At minimum someone who can actually touch and see the work that needs to be done.
    I will also point out that the companies who have historically had good support (Cisco, among others) tend to have users that don't fall into category 1.

    --
    Ack!
  273. Maybe you deserve it... by thedji · · Score: 1

    If you're _calling_ a telemarketing line, I hope you do get fired.

    --
    ... and then there were none
  274. Uni's by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Another thing I generally don't buy, is that the university system is any better here than abroad. And I've experience several of them. In fact I find it rather mediocre at best over here. But maybe that's another topic for another day.

    I expect it is a subjective topic, but by most usual metrics including the popular rankings, it's stunning. Of the top 50 in the world, I think 45+ are in the US - and the rest are in Britain. Note that 50 or so years ago, this was most certainly not true, as both England and Germany among others had great universities. That said, many Asian nations are on the way up (though I believe Japan is a bit stagnant), but watch out for India, China, and Korea.

    But between America's commitment to funding research and the system by which technology is transferred between Universities and private sector, it's amazing.

    Now as for more aesthetic considerations, that's a different story. But as support for the industrial and research sectors, the top American universities have no peers in the world. And I don't say that to boast, as I really don't care all that much.

    I'm not *just* making this up (no, really!), I've read about significant concern in Europe regarding the deterioration of their University system, in part from underfunding.

    Put another way, what the hell *else* is keeping America on top? I think we'll all agree it's not the intellect of the populace on average, and it sure as hell isn't the public school system (ie, high school), as that's a joke. I can't think of anything but America's funding of the sciences, primarily.


    But I like your general optimism that about constant innovation. You've got the right attitude. Time will tell if it stays true.

    Time will certainly be the determiner there - but unlike most Americans on here, I wouldn't be at all displeased to see other nations enter the first world, as I'm comfortable with my skills and abilities. The more, the merrier, as far as economies go.

    Where you from originally, incidentally?

    1. Re:Uni's by avdp · · Score: 1

      Belgium

  275. Jeeeeeeez! by thedji · · Score: 1

    I suppose you pay for your movies and music too?

    ;)

    --
    ... and then there were none
    1. Re:Jeeeeeeez! by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      I suppose you pay for your movies and music too?

      I've seen over 100 films in the theater this year, own over one thousand legit DVDs and several thousand legit CDs. But I also had 13,000 mp3s on Napster and Audiogalaxy when they were at their peak, and have a huge library of home-recorded VHS tapes. I'm on both sides of the fence.

      But the difference is that Salon (unlike the Wall Street Journal) makes their material available for "free" access to everyone, for the low price of viewing an ad. Add on Salon's positive coverage of open source software, their policy of making all their archive articles available (unlike most newspaper web sites) and other factors - it just seems like a rather shitty thing to do to them. That's really the guiding moral principle here - you don't shit on your friends, especially when they are struggling to make it. They get paid based on how many people see that ad, and posting the full text was a shitty thing to do.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  276. Re:Tech Support for some large company (true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhhh... the what fun it was doing.. DUM BAH DUM... XBOX SUPPORT!!!

  277. 3dfx support by 3dfxoldtimer · · Score: 1

    I had the chance to work at one of the rare exceptions, I'm sure some had a bad experiences, it's inevitable but we were complemented by industry reviewers on more than one occasion for our support. We had a free 800 number and actually did a decent job of providing solutions. On top of that our department was reasonably fun. How many people can say that in cubicle land? Our secret? NO CALL TIME QOUTAS!! Sure we cared how many calls you took but in the end the big stat was available/unavailable time. Didn't matter if their was a slight pause in the call que giving you a break, didn't matter if it took 40 minutes to solve a problem, just don't spend 3hrs sitting in the can. But then our company was in the buisness of selling video cards and getting it to work so you wouldn't take it back to Fry's and exchange it. If only we could have remained competitive with Nvidia. :) Part of the reason we were able to exist in such a land of milk and honey was because the 3dfx support was a better organised and larger version of the already good STB support we did before merging with 3dfx. We were able to solve most problems... That is... Unless you were running that damn "such n such" motherboard with the freaking (insert cheap-ass brand) AGP chipset, and you've got the DAMN WRONG chipset drivers loaded in windows, because like a MORON! you decided to just move your hard drive to the new mother board WITHOUT reinstalling (it used to really matter more, honest). And now you call us wondering why you can't get 200fps like the gamer-website-reviewer goofs who were over clocking their systems to the point of "BULLSHIT, TOTAL BULLSHIT" cause "god knows" if they get just another 10fps they might Out-Frag the other guy .... sigh, that place was fun.

  278. Re:Worked in a call center-Howdy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Howdy from a former Voyager.net customer. Small upstairs walkup in Broad Ripple not far from a school in Indy. I would be the guy who left my payment at your door after hours. Pleasent tech support, although I never really needed tech support (billing was another matter :) I rode thru all the name changes until I left for broadband (back to dialup, bad economy).

  279. cure your ignorance, mallrebel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    corpsec: look up Pinkertons. google for Union Busting or Railroad Strikes.

    also, your rationale is puerile.

    let's see YOU run a solvent news-site, punkass.

  280. Re:I don't get it. Dell is famous for crap support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it. Dell is famous for crap support and yet people keep buying from them. Don't respond with "dell gave me great support" I am not talking about you. I am talking to the people that keep coming back to have their asskicked.

    My company often bought from Dell because that was the mandate of the client. And for good reason, actually, as the client had a Dell support contract, and anytime one of the machines got fucked up, Dell had a person onsite within 4 hours. Period. That's one hell of a support contract.

    I have no doubt Dell's phone support sucks, but then when I was working for this company, I never needed the phone support. If the hardware was fucked and I knew it, I rang the number, said get somebody here, and somebody was there, usually with a whole new system as a drop in replacement. Within 4 hours.

  281. Depends where you are by achurch · · Score: 1

    Good service in any business arena is the exception and not the rule.

    I wouldn't be so quick to state a blanket rule; I think a large part of the problem is related to (American/Western?) culture. I live in Japan, and though I rarely have occasion to deal with tech support in particular, I have almost never experienced situations such as you or the article describe, whether at McDonald's, at the local government office, or on the phone--everyone I speak with is polite and helpful. I still have vague memories of US support lines, so I can understand (and laugh morbidly at) stories like this, but if not, I'd be completely baffled.

    (Disclaimer: I am fluent in Japanese.)

  282. Business model? by abb3w · · Score: 1

    The problem is, as mentioed earlier, their busisness model. No one seems to have developed a resonable and equitable way to pay outsourcers, because the per call method simply does not work.

    I've noticed better quality customer service from places that assign issue ticket ID numbers. IE:

    Tech: Welcome to TIC tech support; can I have your user ID?

    Caller: mst3k@TIC.net

    Tech: [Clickety] Right. You last called us two days ago about a networking problem. Is that still the issue?

    Caller: No, that's not it. This is something new.

    Tech: Well, let's see what we can do.
    [Time passes]
    Well, since you don't have a dead chicken handy to wave over the computer, you can pick one up at your local butcher's shop. If that doesn't work, call us back and refer to ticket ID number [clickety] 123456789A.

    Caller: Uh, chicken.... right.
    [Click]

    Tech: Oh, damn. I hope he doesn't get one from KFC...

    So, if you can come up with a way that pays them per ticket, rather than per call, you might have better results. This system too can be gamed-- such as by techs opening new tickets each time regardless. This can be worked around: tickets considered closed if caller doesn't call back in 30 days on the issue; ticket considered open if the caller references it; ISP pays outsourcer for closed tickets, with an increasing but asymptotic scale ($1, $1.50, $1.75, $1.88, $1.93...) depending on how many calls it takes to fix it.

    There's better solutions, no doubt, but I DON'T COME UP WITH THEM FOR A LIVING, and certainly not before my morning coffee. I have, however, read a few articles on outsourcing, and they all agree: you will get what you say you're paying for. So if ISPs want better service departments, they can come up with a way to pay for solutions rather than phone calls.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  283. Re:ok gotta rat em out, I used to work for this pl by peekitty · · Score: 1

    Sounds about right to me. I went there for an interview and walked out 10 minutes into the "pitch." The metal detector and X-ray belt (bought at an airline liquidation no doubt) should have been a giveway. They had a room full of applicants and some scumbag was explaining the pay scale and benefits, and I just couldn't believe the level of suckitude. It's easy to see why the employees might like a little gunplay. It would have been far less entertaining if I was hungry though...

    FWIW, my current employer gets a constant stream of applicants that are former or current TAG employees, they always claim that they were in the IT department but don't have the skills to back that up.

  284. Re:Oversea tech support by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

    1. No one provides services free of charge. You pay for them somewhere. When Gateway unbundled their free lifetime tech support, the price of their systems dropped by over $100.

    2. As I said, if Dell DID NOT pass their savings on to customers, they'd be out of business when someone else started undercutting them. This may be changing as they become a de facto monopoly in the business PC market. (I haven't been involved in purchasing PCs for about two years so will not push this point too strongly.)

    3. If I REALLY want to feel cheated I can look at the biggest kleptocracy in the world (the US government) but I digress.

  285. A message from the Secretary General by danila · · Score: 1

    "And these people call our socialist economy inefficient and oriented not towards creating actual results, but the impression of results only."

    Leonid Brezhnev, the Secretary General of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, after RTFA.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  286. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We don't support that"
    We're not here to help fix your computer. We just want to get you off the phone. A tech-support slave tells his hellish tale.

    Editor's note: All names have been changed.

    - - - - - - - - - - - -
    By Kyle Killen

    Feb. 23, 2004 | Class officially started three hours ago, but our instructor has not yet arrived. This is not uncommon. By now many of my classmates have begun to bring cards, magazines and DVDs to pass the time. "The Matrix" is playing on someone's laptop and has attracted a small crowd in the back of the room. The fact that we're being paid largely to sit around and entertain ourselves has been the source of lots of jokes and smiles, but in the back of our minds we can't help but be concerned.

    Several people confess that they've never done more with a computer than check their e-mail. Others admit they haven't even gotten that far. An impromptu contest develops to see exactly who knows the least. There are lots of contenders. I'm listening to them battle for the crown of incompetence as I'm dealt a new hand of cards when a frightening thought occurs to me. Our clueless bunch is now part of the technical-support staff for one of the world's top three computer manufacturers, and in seven days we're going to be taking your calls.

    - - - - - - - - - - - -

    Ken is standing in the aisle, tethered to his cube by the spiraled umbilical of his headset, holding an unlit cigarette, and yelling. Ken is always yelling, and that's why we love him. Lots of us jot down Ken's more memorable tirades and compare notes on our breaks. Now, standing near my cube, screaming in the urgent and gravelly tones of a mid-40s chain smoker trapped in a non-smoking building, Ken tells a customer, "Quit whining and go get a damn screwdriver. I don't have time for this bullshit."

    None of us is sure how he gets away with it, especially considering that Ken saves his real anger for dealing with management. His conversations with the higher-ups all end with Ken screaming, "This is bullshit! Total bullshit!" and hanging up.

    We all understand why Ken is angry. We've been tech-support representatives for six weeks and already a third of our training class has left. A new crop of techs hit the floor last week, and two of them are already gone. It might be tempting to believe that the customers are driving the techs away, that they just can't take the stress of dealing with endless complaints and callers driven to near madness by interminable holds. But the callers just want answers. Ken, and those of us who are left, are angry because for the most part we don't have them.

    When we pick up the phone we're lying. We don't really work for the company we say we work for. Because of the expense of housing and running a technical support operation, many computer manufacturers choose to outsource the work. We work for one such outsourcer, though you'd never know it just to talk to us. To the customer on the other end of the line the distinction, while important, is invisible.

    Outsourcers are paid by the computer manufacturer based on the number of calls they handle. The more calls we take, the more the outsourcer is paid. So naturally everything that happens in this vast carpeted warehouse of cubicles is done with an eye toward speed. Our managers stress something called "average call time," which is simply the average amount of time a tech spends on each call. They want us to be under 12 minutes. Our phones monitor our ability to reach this magic number as well as the total number of calls we take, the number of times we ask for help, how much time we take between calls, even the amount of time we spend in the restroom. In short, your phone is always watching you.

    Twelve minutes can sometimes be difficult even if you know what you're doing. It is impossible if you don't have a clue. The stress of always being on the clock without really knowing how to do your job has already claimed a third of my classmates, and from the looks of the bulging vei

  287. Re:Taken care of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sure she is aware of that. This is Slashdot, a news site for nerds. Nerds know how to use a proxy, etc.

  288. Small world! by Dictator+For+Life · · Score: 1

    AST was the Stream group of which I was a part. There were some good people in the group, but there were a lot of punters and idiots, too.

    --

    DFL

    Never send a human to do a machine's job.

  289. Re:Tech Support for some large company (true story by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

    *ahem*...according to the NDA I signed with them (I think I did anyway)...I am to say "No comment."

  290. Re:ok gotta rat em out, I used to work for this pl by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

    Yes. All he says is true. I live in Coral Spgings and I had 2 roommates who worked there and they told me the same things. The metal detector and the minimum wage thing, I know about firsthand since I went there to apply for a job this afternoon. They are really my bottom choice but I need the experience to get a job somewhere else.

  291. Re:ok gotta rat em out, I used to work for this pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know all about TAG, unfortunately. I don't work there, but I have to deal with them every day. I work for another call center that shares a client with TAG. EVERY SINGLE DAY I read notes on customer's accounts where TAG agents do the dumbest things. For example: we have a modem that you can use the URL launchmodem to access the interface for. I've seen TAG agents try to use that URL with THE COMPLETELY WRONG MODEM, and then send a technician out to replace a defective modem! By the time people get to me, they're usually pissed at TAGs incompetence (though its all the same company to them)

    While I'm at it... not everyone that does Tech Support cares about making money for the company. I could care less what my stats look like. My sup's ask me why my call times are high, and I tell them to look at my Customer Satisfaction survey. I might have an Average Call Time of 25 minutes, but my CSAT survey average is 97%.
    The other day, I got a call from a customer who needed some help getting LiveUpdate to work with our service. I helped them do it.... its no more than 5 quick clicks to fix. Guess what? I got yelled at. Why? Because we don't support it. My response was "I can help them. I know how. Why should I have to tell them to call Symantec, who charges $30 an incident, when I can make them extremely happy in under 5 minutes?" The answer I got: We don't want to be held liable for any damage caused by trying to fix an unsupported issue. (!!!)

  292. Re:this will fix it by Bombcar · · Score: 1

    Why does http://www.caughron.com/ not work in Mozilla under Gentoo?

    C'mon, a liberally educated graduate should be able to do better.

    Oh, yeah, for +5 troll, the troll mod had to come BEFORE the last +1 mod, otherwise it would be +4.

    And yes, I am a smart @$$.

    heheheheheheh

  293. Two Answers. by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

    > Who needs support for long-distance phone service?

    I'm not talking about the LD service in your house. I'm talking about trouble reporting and feature management. You know, you need to change the DNIS on one of your groups. Or, one of your voice Ts goes spotty, and you want to frog it with one of your internet Ts... since TCP is a little more forgiving to spotty outages. Or, your center blows up, and you need to re-route all inbound traffic to another location. Dumb things like these need people with a clue, and they are time-sensitive.

    > And how many "infrastructure improvements" did the Telcos make back when they were charging us 26 cents a minute?

    Well, I know at the AT&T bunker to the south of us, they used to fly their cable routes every other day, to help make sure their stuff wouldn't get backhoed. Little things like that, which are now gone, do cost money.

    OTOH, if you're talking about feature creep... that's a whole different matter.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  294. Re:ok gotta rat em out, I used to work for this pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an ex-tagger....

    They're not looking for guns or knives. They're looking for cellphones and floppy disks. No antivirus system on most machines, you know. A disgruntled employee could do major damage, and the minimum wage thing keeps most of their employees disgruntled.

    Personally, I didn't mind it. I fixed problems whenever I could. I had customers who'd spend ten minutes trying to convince me to format their machines...

    It all depends on your work ethic and your TL's work ethic. My POV is that if I don't fix it, the next guy they reach will just break things worse. And if somebody's willing to learn, I'm willing to teach them. My team leaders generally didn't care enough to stop me.

    Of course a friend of mine managed to get four-minute average call times by unplugging his phone and waiting for people to hang up when they got dead air.

    Posted AC for...reasons

  295. Re: Light bulb by philharhamica · · Score: 1

    Answer: Electrocute the ladder and throw the light bulb away. If the ladder is female it does not need time to warm up.

    --
    scottiebear