Slashdot Mirror


Israeli Army Frowns on D&D

Big Rob found us a gem of a story about the Israeli Army frowning on D&D players. Apparently '18-year-olds who tell recruiters they play the popular fantasy game are automatically given low security clearance.' I especially enjoyed the pictures of D&D players with swords, as generally the only thing in my hand during D&D is soda and/or swiss cake rolls. I'm thinking that a few generals should meet up with Jack Chick and have a good long discussion about the evils of role playing.

984 comments

  1. IDF has smart people working for them ... by YankeeInExile · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I do not mean to cast aspersions on D and D players, but if IDF says that people who indulge in fantasy games, as a statistical group, have personality traits that make them a lower security risk, then I am inclined to believe them.

    After all, these people have some of the best clinical and occupational psychologists in the world working for them.

    One possible characteristic not mentioned in TFA was: People who role-play might be more inclined to game the system - definitely not a desirable personality trait to have in personnel deployed in sensitive positions.

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    1. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think you meant "higher" security risk.

    2. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... personality traits that make them a lower security risk...

      I'll assume you meant to say, higher security risk.

      Also, I believe you have an excellent point. I and a bunch of my friends have been avid Mage players for a few years now. (Much better game, IMHO, check it out at http://www.white-wolf.com.) Anyways, one of my friends joined the army a few years ago, entering the intelligence branch. They eventually took away his security clearence because of some of the stuff he was analyzing about his unit.

    3. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by idontgno · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Wow.

      but if IDF says that people who indulge in fantasy games, as a statistical group, have personality traits that make them a lower security risk, then I am inclined to believe them.

      "They're really smart. They must know what they're talking about."

      One possible characteristic not mentioned in TFA was: People who role-play might be more inclined to game the system - definitely not a desirable personality trait to have in personnel deployed in sensitive positions.

      WTF? "Game the system"? If you play D&D you realize that "gaming the system" gets you in Shitsville with the game referee (the much maligned "Dungeon Master"). So if anything, D&D players are LESS inclined to "game the system".

      I can't decide if you're an innocent clueless asshat or a troll. And I'm a fairly discerning reader. So hats off to you!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by dsginter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed. Dig for the video (I won't be rude enough to link to a single copy). You'll find yourself laughing because the typical D&D person does fall into one of these categories many times.

      A good laugh, if anything.

      --
      More
    5. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...except that they're given a lower security clearance, not considered a lower risk. (This results in being barred from sensitive positions, as noted in TFA.)

    6. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by YankeeInExile · · Score: 0

      Blockquoth the Anonymous Coward:

      I think you meant "higher" security risk.
      D'oh! Yeah -- of course I meant higher
      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    7. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 1, Funny

      One possible characteristic not mentioned in TFA was: People who role-play might be more inclined to game the system - definitely not a desirable personality trait to have in personnel deployed in sensitive positions.

      How do you game the system in D&D? Shaved dice? Counterfeit hit charts?

      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    8. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      haha... your funny. This is nothing more then ignorance.
      The numbers they cite where pointless. How many people would not qualify for high clearence if ALL recruits went to see the psychiatrist? who knows.

      Another case where someone who does something different has to experience bigitory. Personally, I would welcome some good open studies on role-players. The few that where done(that I know of) never found in results worth reporting.
      I say this as someone who has play role-playing games since '76*.

      *I loath to put out how long I have been playing, because I hate those 'I've been playing for x years therefore I am right' types. I do feel that disclosure is neccessary for context in this discussion.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      After all, these people have some of the best clinical and occupational psychologists in the world working for them.

      And they also have the common bias of military types: anything too creative is scary and dangerous.

    10. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I do not mean to cast aspersions on D and D players, but if IDF says that people who indulge in fantasy games, as a statistical group, have personality traits that make them a lower security risk, then I am inclined to believe them. After all, these people have some of the best clinical and occupational psychologists in the world working for them.

      Something carried on 60 minutes (take with whativer size grain of salw you wish) One other thing you may wish to consider, few of the radical-right, orhtodox jews, serve in combat rolls in the IDF. Why? Because they're religious scholars and exempt from such duty. Yet, they are usually the ones howling the loudest about how it's their promised land and establish these lovely settlements in whatever speck of land the palestinians have left. You can usually tell, when you see some footage on TV, these people are heavily armed and ready to die for their house on the pile of rocks they claimed for themselves. They also tend to have larger families and are expected to control the majority of the electorate in a country where the armed forces are mostly composed of the secular or moderate jews.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    11. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You game the system by gaming the dungeon master.

      I've fast talked/threatened my dungeon master into letting me to throw two more extra dice every time I generate stats for a new character and pick the best three results. How? It was easy: "I don't like this character and when the next scenario begins, I'll just jump off the cliff. I'll do that until I get the stats/race/name/weapons I want". In his mind, letting me to use extra dice was a "compromise". ;-)

    12. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wow, do you know a single thing about Israel? Israel is a secular government in a country that happens to have many jews. Many of the prominent figures in the government are jewish, it's even refered to as a jewish state, however the government is very secular. The best proof of this is the numerous Palestinians in Israeli territory (not in the west bank or gaza) who do not complain of religious discrimination of any kind.
      Furthermore, the very religious in Israel tend not to serve in the army (or at least try not to)- these are the people who are the most likely to take issue with the characters in D&D (and even then, it's not likely)

    13. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by prgrmr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm guessing that the IDF pshrinks found that D&D gamers tend to be more indivualistic. Being in the military is, by necessity, to be part of a team and the team has to come first, thereby presenting an inherant conflict of interest which may present itself at some very inopportune moment.

    14. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "game the system"?

      Are you calling D&D players spys? Yet the TFA says "The game indicates a weak personality", not a very desirable spy attribute.

      Once again it looks like another group is trying to target the game and draws strange unfounded conclusions.

      Besides, we all know that video games are causing all of lifes problems, not D&D this year.

    15. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by rainman_bc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but if IDF says that people who indulge in fantasy games, as a statistical group, have personality traits that make them a lower security risk, then I am inclined to believe them.

      There was a point in time where ECT in mental institutions was commonplace because it was endorsed by the American Psychology Association.

      Today, we know that ECT only helps certain cases of clinical depression, and is used only in extreme cases when no other solution exists.

      If you go further back with the same association, they used to perform labotamies. Do you think that practice is done today?

      We need to be critical of experts. You cannot always agree with experts.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    16. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      About half my group (in a Q cleared section of Los Alamos National Lab) play D&D. But by nature scientists are geeks.

    17. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by DurendalMac · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, just think of what would happen if they ran at an enemy shouting "LIGHTNING BOLT! LIGHTNING BOLT!" and throwing balls of tinfoil...

      Probably redundant by now, but oh well.

    18. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by NoTheory · · Score: 1

      This is a bad filter for competence. The reason why it's such a bad metric for filtering, is because D&D is simply one instance of a class of behaviors. D&D is a fictional abstracted game system, and it's not at all clear how this differs from... well any other game, particularly given the richness present in any modern video game you want to pick up. They're all deviations/abstractions on reality.

      As that is the case, it seems to me that if you're going to claim that D&D players are unhinged from reality, that the American DOD's interest in training simulators and other games is extremely confused (this is of course assuming that the US DOD and the IDF have similar feelings on simulated training).

      The other conclusion is that the IDF isn't making sense.

      --
      There are lives at stake here!
    19. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Xugumad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Last time I heard of anyone applying for a high clearance job, part of the interview process was talking to a psychiatrist...

    20. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it matter? American Democracy is nothing more than 8 year swings of alternating fascism and communism.

    21. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      I never have for a clearance. Of course "high clearance" is relative.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    22. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Then your DM was a weenie. One of my players tried to pull that once. He had a nice time watching TV while the rest played the rest of the session after he offed a character that wasn't "maxed out" to his satisfaction.

      Had he done it a second time, he'd have found his seat taken come the 3rd session.

    23. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One possible characteristic not mentioned in TFA was: People who role-play might be more inclined to game the system - definitely not a desirable personality trait to have in personnel deployed in sensitive positions.

      I see some issues here. How many politicians "game the system", yet have never played D&D? Ted Kennedy probably never played, but he's one of the masters, you have to be if you can drive drunk, drown a girl and not lose your licence and face a few year's hard time like he should have. The same goes for car salespeople. Lawyers.

      Also, IDF has a big name attached to them, but that doesn't make their claims necessarily true.

      I can't say much as I've never played a collector card game or RPG.

    24. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing there's nothing self-serving in that reply.

    25. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      It's referred to as "Min-Maxing" and is particularly bad in systems with a Merits/Flaws, Advantages/Disadvantages, etc... system.

      You do the number crunching and figure out where you can put your lowest score that it will effect you the least (this usually ends up in CHA in my D&D experience), and the highest where it will do you the most good. Skills, etc.. are handled the same way.

    26. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After all, these people have some of the best clinical and occupational psychologists in the world working for them.

      Give me a fucking break. "They are wise, therefore they can do no wrong".

      One very important point about statistics: You can always set the premise before gathering the data, and then find statistics to back up your premise.

      The IDF works with some of the worst relgious zealots in the world. I think this is the primary reason for discouraging D&D-- the game deals with religious ideas which are foreign. That is forbidden among many fundamentalists.

      This is certainly the situation among many fundamentalist Christian communities in the US. You're from Redding, so I assume you would know this.

      Don't get me wrong. Isreal has a right to survive and defend itself, but the ruling bodies of Isreal are filled with religious zealots. Zealots cannot be trusted-- no matter the religion.

    27. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      There was a point in time where ECT in mental institutions was commonplace because it was endorsed by the American Psychology Association.

      Still is, both common, and endorsed by the APA.

      Today, we know that ECT only helps certain cases of clinical depression, and is used only in extreme cases when no other solution exists.

      Define "we".

      Truth is, not only is it still common, it can be done to an *involuntarily* committed patient, against their expressed will. There's still enough whack-job psychiatrists out there who think it works (it doesn't), and the rest of 'em all just turn a blind eye to it.

    28. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by chrish · · Score: 1

      Of course not... they don't carry much treasure, and they don't give very many experience points.

      --
      - chrish
    29. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      The manner that the APA endoreses ECT is a tad different than the days of "One Flew over the Cuckoo's Next" according to a Psych Prof from SFU. She said that it's used in really quick, sort controlled bursts to aid clinical depression. Apparently the dose is much lighter and more controlled, and much shorter than before.

      I meant "we" as a society...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    30. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by northcat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why do slashdotters take everything remotely saying something other than praising "geeks" as an insult? The Israeli army is saying that *Israelis* who play D&D (probably in a way that's done only in Israel) are not very good for the army. They're not saying that slashdotters have small penises.

    31. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by oGMo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We need to be critical of experts. You cannot always agree with experts.

      The problem is that the experts, in most cases, aren't. They may be well-studied, but the more you focus on studying something, generally the less experience and up-to-date knowledge you have on it.

      It's like a theory of academic relativity, or something.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    32. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by northcat · · Score: 1

      RTFA. It says they are bad because "They're detached from reality and suscepitble to influence" (emphasis mine). Almost the opposite of what you say. They're bad because they are impressionable.

    33. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by northcat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You cannot always agree with experts.

      But everyone on slashdot seems to think that you should always disagree with experts.

    34. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Being in the military is, by necessity, to be part of a team and the team has to come first,

      D&D, and most other role-playing games are exactly the embodiment of this. They are about teams achieving things, and it is not uncommon for one member to make a personal (or ultimate) sacrifice so that the team can achieve their goal. What they seldom have however, is a strict hierachy. This is a good thing in that the team learns to work together through willing co-operation and pooling creativity and knowledge. In practice, this is not how a [modern Western] military unit operates. Instead, they condition soldiers to obey orders and not question.

      If there is any basis for the Israeli army's bias other than ignorance, then it is the creativity and ability to think away from the official point of view that is the "problem."

      Just too many D&D'ers must ask themselves what is the alignment of my army, and come up with the answer Lawful Evil.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    35. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Punboy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      *Higher security risk They recieve lower security clearance, meaning they are a higher risk for exposing secrets.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    36. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      "t, thereby presenting an inherant conflict of interest which may present itself at some very inopportune moment."

      I think it might also have to do with the D&D players letting the decision to attack depend on their D20 ;)

    37. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Tassach · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's why I prefer a points-based system for character generation (like GURPS) rather than a roll-the-dice approach. Since everyone starts with the same number of points, you don't have anyone to blame but yourself if you don't wind up with a character you want to play.

      Sure, you can build an unrealistic combat monster this way, but a good GM will penalize players that do that by putting them in situations where they need non-combat skills to succede.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    38. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by muntjac · · Score: 1

      this attitude boggles my mind. you apparently have more faith in psychology than common sense. how can it be seen as anything but ridiculous to screen entrants based on something so obviously trivial as a game they play?

      "IDF has smart people working for them," so by all means lets all throw common sense out the window and give up our individual identities to be judged based on some superficial nonsense.

    39. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This is a bad filter for competence

      I would go so far as to suggest, this is a good filter for competence. Unfortunately, it filters it out.

      D&Ders have spent many hours at roleplay and small team tactics and teamwork, as well as in noticing small details in their surroundings. This is something that is not usually taught in high school.

      The ability to roleplay (thinking in someone else's shoes) is essential to being able to think in terms of what your enemy might do to you. It improves the survivability of both you and your team.

      Roleplay also helps you to map your behaviours into what is expected of you for the position you play on the team (point, CO, 2i/c etc.) By roleplaying your position well, you will help your team to function better. By being able to take on another person's role in the team quickly, you will give the team flexibility and survivability.

      Then again if all you want is to recruit is a bunch of orcs to play "catch the bullet" or "kill what I point at" or "let none pass" (hey I thought YOU killed the guard), well then, the filter might be working just as designed.

      Today's modernized armies have such a superior tech advantage over their immediate enemies, their commanders are probably relying on it to ensure sufficient survivability of their troops.

      I'm sure the Romans felt the same way.

    40. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by MattGWU · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but if they're elves they are less vulerable to mind-affecting stuff like that, and if the candidate has a high Will save, they're probably not much of a risk, unless they blow a roll somewhere.

      --
      "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
    41. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by starwed · · Score: 1

      the more you focus on studying something, generally the less experience and up-to-date knowledge you have on it.

      Ah, I see, the only people you can trust on a subject are those who have barely studied it at all...

      It's like a theory of homeopathic expertise, or something

    42. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just too many D&D'ers must ask themselves what is the alignment of my army, and come up with the answer Lawful Evil.

      That's right. The military would certainly reject me on the grounds that I am Chaotic Evil, and just as likely to fire on my comrades as the enemy --- discriminating bastards.

    43. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had my car's alignment checked the other day. It's Chaotic Evil.

    44. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually you got it backwards. it's the anti religious left wing zealots controlling israel..
      the religious ones have no power whatsoever.
      that's why that country is in such shape.
      i won't go into a 100 page explanation but that's how that coutry works.

    45. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by nidarus · · Score: 1
      In practice, this is not how a [modern Western] military unit operates. Instead, they condition soldiers to obey orders and not question.
      Oh come on, do you even know how Israeli soldiers are trained, or are you just relying on your political views of Israel? The IDF prides itself on being a "small and smart" army - that's obviously disputable, but it certainly not an "army of drones" strategy. Now, if you have any concrete examples to the contrary (regarding the training of the soldiers), I would like to hear them, but for now, it just seems that you're making this up (or heavily extrapolating).
    46. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had such an interview, and I can tell you that the interview is not exactly a careful psychological analysis.

    47. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      I've only seen things on the news, and some of the settlements are pretty close to full-blown towns, but some of the others look more like discarded trailer homes dragged in by mule.

      Then again, some people will do anything for manifest destiny.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    48. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Then again, some people will do anything for manifest destiny.

      Indeed. Early settlers in the plains states dug out holes and built their roofs and walls of sod.

      From what I gather from BBC articles, it's pretty expensive living in Israel, so tossing up a caravan on a pile of rocks and defending it with an uzi is what some people are driven to.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    49. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by operagost · · Score: 1
      FINGER OF DEATH! *poke* *poke*

      Damn, he must have saved. Hope my "Protection from Evil" works.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    50. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by sharp-bang · · Score: 1

      After all, these people have some of the best clinical and occupational psychologists in the world working for them.

      Maybe, but that doesn't mean that any of them were consulted with respect to this decision.

      --
      #!
    51. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by operagost · · Score: 0, Troll
      The IDF works with some of the worst relgious zealots in the world. I think this is the primary reason for discouraging D&D-- the game deals with religious ideas which are foreign. That is forbidden among many fundamentalists.
      Mister, they del with foreign religious idealogues every day. They're called "Muslims." Ever heard of them? They're the ones bombing the cafes.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    52. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by graywolf001 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I agree too. The military are well known for being rational.
      In fact, why stop there?
      Next, they should refuse to give you a license for having played Burnout
      (They should also pay you in kmart vouchers if you admit to ever having gambled in your life)

    53. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I'd call a modern army "Lawful Neutral"... that is, it follows orders and doesn't much care if those orders help people (good) or help the army's members only(evil).

    54. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Ralconte · · Score: 1

      Meh ... more likely some old guy high up in the brass found that it was based on mythology, Western mythology to top it all off, and decided to descriminate. The last thing any military wants from recruits is ideas "outside the box".

      Creativity, teamwork are all nice, in any field. But I'll bet any boss is going to critical of someone who talks like "My elf has 127 hp, with a power rating of ... and so I can take on a group of 10 orcs, no problem"

    55. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Point Buy in D&D?

    56. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Palestinian's "speck of land" is really to the east. It's called Jordan

      Yes. Lets just brush aside that you're calling for ethnic cleansing of millions of people from their homes because you've ordained that they should live in Jordan just because they're the same race.

      The Israelis have offered large chunks

      The old "Barak's Generous Offer" myth rears its ugly head again. Here's a map that really drives its generosity home.

      Now can we get back to discussing role playing and whether or not that makes you a security risk?

    57. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Are you calling D&D players spys? Yet the TFA says "The game indicates a weak personality", not a very desirable spy attribute.


      Actually, that's a good trait in a spy and a bad trait in an itteligence officer (which is what I think you mean) or person with access to senstive materials. Why?

      An intelligence officer (i.e. a professinal who recruits and runs agents for their government) wants to get somene they can control in order to gain information. A wek personality would be someone who is easier to convince and influnece to do what you want. People who feel they aren't getting recognition they deserve or have rich fantasy lifes where they are soem sort of important person would be fertile grounds for recruitment.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    58. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's probably because D&D has a system that has multiple gods. Just the thought of that would make any fundamentalist burst into tears, or try to shoot you, depending on his state of mind at the time

    59. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Tassach · · Score: 1
      Like Point Buy in D&D?
      Well, the only version of AD&D I've played was 1st edition, which had no provision for buying points. I've looked at (but haven't played with) the 3.5 rules, and they look pretty lame and restrictive to me compared to GURPS.
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    60. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      the USA will win the War On Terror because our priesthood favors Helm.

    61. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by drxenos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you tried with with me, you would have found your self playing alone. Jump off a cliff because you didn't get the stats you wanted? Fine, your character is dead and you are done.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    62. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... your best character was a Paladin?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    63. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      But everyone on slashdot seems to think that you should always disagree with experts.
      Not true. It's OK to agree with experts who say what you already believe. Bonus points for attributing to an expert something that he didn't actually say.
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    64. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American Democracy is nothing more than 8 year swings of alternating fascism and communism. ...and this relates to the IDF (Israelies) exactly how?

    65. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Thangodin · · Score: 1

      They may have smart people working for them, but any strongly hierarchical system will end up with blind spots that originate at the top and are perpetuated throughout the system. The psychologists do what they're told, same as anyone else. They find what they're told to look for.

      Military, Intelligence, and police forces usually don't have the tightest grip on reality themselves. Most police forces still believe in lie detectors, and many consult psychics. The CIA gave us MK-Ultra, remote viewing, and the tin foil hat, and to this day the U.S. military is paying soldiers to sit in a room and try to think their way through a wall. They probably picked this up from the KGB, who were the largest wholesale distributers of woo-woo science on the planet. The psychological tests the IDF is using probably falls into this category. If they actually worked, there would be no such thing as double agents...

    66. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      The CIA looks for individuals with weak personalities to double cross their governments for intelligence gathering.

      A weak personality could leak and become a double agent.

    67. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Etherael · · Score: 1
      Check your assumptions perhaps;

      * The IDF has a bunch of clever people working for them. (probably true)

      By all reports available it's a highly efficient organisation, tested time and again at getting the job it's been assigned to do done, that being ensuring the military superiority of Israel in it's immediate geographical area.

      Note that this implies nothing with regards to using their criteria as an accurate judge of character, the ideal subject for a modern abbatoir is a fat and docile cow, that doesn't mean an intelligent human is somehow less 'worthy' in general, than said fat and docile cow. I'll let you draw your own conclusions with regards to the ideal specimen for the military.

      Most other assumptions on the subject, based on the above, are likely false. for the D&D players, I wouldn't take it to heart, I'd be more of the opinion that it's like someone in the rank sewer field of politics approaching you and saying you're not cut out for their line of work, how could you possibly find that insulting?

      To each their own. :)

    68. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      Kennedy didn't "game the system". He used it the way it was meant to be used. Poor people might try to game the system, but rich men simply use the system as-is.

      Perhaps you were unaware that "the system", for all of human history, has been created by wealthy rulers for the benefit of wealthy rulers? Instances where this appeared not to be true were merely brief transitional periods between differing sets of wealthy rulers.

    69. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      I meant "we" as a society...

      "We" as a society know nothing about this. We only know what a very few psychiatrists tell us. Most of them are keeping their lips tightly shut on this subject, mostly for fear of opening up a massive issue of bad publicity regarding the subject.

      In private, most psychiatrists will tell you that those who still believe in ECT are nothing more than barbarians.

      I mean, seriously, being involuntarily subjected to ECT for *depression*? Anyone who thinks that strapping someone down against their will and shooting electricity through them will *improve* their morale is more in need of psychiatric help than the patient is.

    70. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by dclydew · · Score: 1

      That's when Cthulhu comes from the watery depths and eats them. Then they get to make a new, non-twinkie character.

      Any player who pulls min/max simply has a spinless (or foolish) DM.

      Ratatosk, Squirrel of Discord
      Chatterer of The Words of Eris
      Muncher of The ChaoAcorn
      POEE of The Great Googlie Mooglie Cabal

      I pity the dumbass that thinks that I'm detached from reality.

      --
      Get a life, not a lifestyle. - Hikem Bey
    71. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdotters have small penises.

      Seems we have a new #7, Top Ten Reasons why I have not signed up to be a slashdotter.

      Thank you.

      AC

    72. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by gelfling · · Score: 1

      I tend to think they saw adults prancing around in costumes and telling each other they really WERE all the strange and fanciful characters they claimed to be, what was tipped them off.

    73. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by RichardX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, from TFA:
      "They're detached from reality and suscepitble to influence," the army says. "Also, many of them read Slashdot, and we find those ones have especially small genitalia."

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    74. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see some issues here. How many politicians "game the system", yet have never played D&D? Ted Kennedy probably never played, but he's one of the masters, you have to be if you can drive drunk, drown a girl and not lose your licence and face a few year's hard time like he should have. The same goes for car salespeople. Lawyers.

      Who is this Ted Kennedy? Is he someone in the Bush White House? Yeah, I can see how if he's one of them he'd be of questionable moral and ethical character.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    75. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Zwets · · Score: 1
      But everyone on slashdot seems to think that you should always disagree with experts.
      Well duh, that's just a special case of General Slashotivity: always disagree with everything (especially with this)!
      --
      One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say. - Will Duran
    76. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. the Palestinians don't complain about religious discrimination. They just complain about being targeted by Israeli helicopters, their children being shot by the IDF while sitting in school or simply crossing the road. The also complain about their land being stolen at gunpoint by colonizers and they complain about not being allowed to travel on roads built on their land which are the exclusive use of right-wing gun wielding Jews.

    77. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by kloidster · · Score: 1

      Making somebody homeless because you can't afford housing somewhere else is not justified.

      On the flip-side, having no job, no home, being put in jail without a reason, having no human rights or dignity, or perhaps having at least one person you know of getting shot (and possibly dying as a result) is what might drive a person to do something totally insane - like commit a suicide attack...

      Both acts are criminal no matter what the circumstances.

      It's silly that an article like this makes its way into /. The people who approve the articles like these should know better than to bring something where there are sensitivities on both sides of the fence.

    78. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

      I can't say much as I've never played a collector card game or RPG.

      Who the hell let this joker in? Hey buddy, read the top of the page, it says 'news for nerds'. Who do you think you are, comming in here and talking trash like that? Now beat it, or I'll PK you with my 3rd level drow ninja/assassin.

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    79. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The manner that the APA endoreses ECT is a tad different than the days of "One Flew over the Cuckoo's Next" according to a Psych Prof from SFU. She said that it's used in really quick, sort controlled bursts to aid clinical depression. Apparently the dose is much lighter and more controlled, and much shorter than before.

      It still causes brain damage, just like APA-endorsed antipsychotics.

    80. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now, if you have any concrete examples to the contrary (regarding the training of the soldiers), I would like to hear them, but for now, it just seems that you're making this up (or heavily extrapolating).

      As with many things, a lot of it comes down to your own view, reflected in the choice of words. It's like the difference between cult and religion depending on which side you're on.

      And with Army induction, you could call it training or brainwashing according to your opinion.

      First off - killing. This is not something that comes naturally to the vast majority of people. It takes an extraordinary amount of pressue for most people to go as far as murder. To bring these people to the point at which they will kill requires extensive conditioning. My source for this was a talk given by a US Marine in a documentary in which he cited casualty statistics from WWII and modern psychological testing that came out with about 2/100 people being "natural killers." Clearly something radical has been done to the completed soldiers if they are now nearly all capable of killing (not that there may not be psychological trauma afterwards).

      Now as to the actual techniques of how this is achieved, I'll offer the following examples. Note that this is only an outline of techniques that on "the other side" would be considered brainwashing.

      Firstly, links to existing social values must be severed.
      Secondly, links to the new social values must replace them.

      Common techniques used by cults, professional interrogators, etc. that are in common with the army are as follows:
      • restricted communication with family and friends
      • detachment: sleeping away from home / placed in strange environment
      • fatigue and discomfort, physical punishment
      • peer group pressure: suppressing doubt and resistance to new ideas by exploiting the need to belong.
      • disinhibition - encouraging child-like obedience by orchestrating child-like behaviour
      • ritual
      • communal eating / travel / work
      • lack of privacy
      • lack of control over own actions / routine
      • lack of information about schedule / routine
      • strictly enforced reward and punishment system for obediance
      • verbal abuse : including enforcing a willingness to accept it
      • dress code: removing individuality by demanding conformity to the group dress code.

      Hopefully, it can be seen how these support the above goals of bringing the recruits personal values into line with the army's and fostering dependance. Of course, the graduate of this, will see it as pride in the army, serving a greater cause or simply having endured it and "become a man." Of course, regardless of whatever has been gained, the recruit has traded in some measure of his own ability to measure the value of things and accepted the value system of the organization. As I said at the start of this, whether you want to regard it as brainwashing or training, is up to you. If you consider however, that psychologically, the exact same process and attitude change is gone through by an Al-Quaeda soldier in Afghanistan (by incidentally, the US Army trained Osama bin Laden) just as with a US marine, then you might feel a certain cognitive dissonance if you think of them as different. In both cases, recruits come to obey the orders and beliefs without questioning them.

      I remember a kid who was half-way through boot camp, telling me gleefully how he was on whatever his jargon term was for latrine duty. He took pride in enduring the punishment - doing it by hand! He was one of the best examples of the effectiveness of these techniques I'd ever met. He was boasting about having to scoop out shit with his bare hands.

      Oh come on, do you even know how Israeli soldiers are trained, or are you just relying on your political views of Israel?

      You know nothing about my political views at the time of posting, so please spare me irrelevant and baseless personal

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    81. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by ch1a · · Score: 1

      Actually, if all soldiers did was throw balls of tinfoil at one another, the world would probably be a better place.

      So perhaps we should be promoting D&D players instead. For the good of humanity!

      --

      --Just because you can doesn't mean you should--
    82. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... That simply means that the subject is in fact, a LARP-er.

      Preclude all hope for salvation, ye who turn down that dark path.

    83. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We need to be critical of experts. You cannot always agree with experts.

      More importantly, you need to think critically before deciding that someone is in fact an "expert". Experts, by definition, know what they are talking about. When supposed "experts" disagree, it can be a hint that some or all are less qualified than you previously believed. There's certainly room for debate in many topics, but these are incredibly fundamental disagreements. The most likely reason is that, as in the software world, "professional" != "expert".

    84. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ..but the IDF is worried that the little velvet dice bags hanging off of their belts might get snagged on things and cause problems.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    85. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by marksilverman · · Score: 1

      haha... your funny.
      The numbers they cite where pointless.
      Another case where someone who does something different has to experience bigitory.
      The few that where done(that I know of) never found in results worth reporting.
      I say this as someone who has play role-playing games since '76*.

      Wow! That post must set a record. What's the deal, You get modded up for each typo? Sorry if I'm being bigitory, perhaps English is not your first language.

    86. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by mikael · · Score: 1

      The enemy would turn around slowly, and reply "I'm a tank! chug chug chug ... Boom!"

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    87. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I just tell my d&d players to assign 80 points among their ability scores, with a maximum of 18 and a minimum of 6.

      That way, the players can get the character they want, and I dont have to worry too much about unbalanced characters.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    88. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Quothz · · Score: 1

      D&D, and most other role-playing games are exactly the embodiment of this. They are about teams achieving things, and it is not uncommon for one member to make a personal (or ultimate) sacrifice so that the team can achieve their goal. Er, I think this is sort of what they're talking about when they say "detached from reality". The loss of a D&D character is neither a personal nor ultimate sacrifice. It's just part of the game, y'know? I play D&D, and have had a (U.S.) clearance. I'm inclined to disagree with the premise they're working from, but I can see the other side of it.

    89. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Retric · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I always found high CHA to be a vary useful stat. I mean with random encounter tables it's nice to be able to avoid fights. It's also useful when dealing with NPC's like town guards where you want info and can't just kill them.

      Then again it depends on the DM. I found people started to try and min / max with me until I started changing things up. Most people had to go from getting lost in the woods one day to tracking down a band of con artists the next to get over the need for "great" stat's. A few nights with little to no combat where they guy with 18/85 STR is feeling useless because he only knows how to swing heavy things tends to make people grow out of the whole MIN / MAX mentality.

      After a while I found people started to try and cover the widest range of skills as a group they could. I mean it's much more fun to have a warrior who wants to role play buying a new weapon because, as a blacksmith, he feels he should know something about how much work it takes to make a quality pike vs. a long sword vs someone who is jus wants to kill everything so he can get as much EXP he can as fast as he can. Hell, one of the most memorable nights revolved around a short-lived bard who would only eat things he knew how to cook.

      Then again most D&D people I knew in HS were either drama queens or stuck on fart jokes so I can see how they can get stuck in the whole Min-Max camp.

    90. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      CHA is only an unimportant statistic in powergames. I had a DM let me run a minotaur in an otherwise human party once, I at least went through the effort of creating a backstory and whatnot, and then proceeded to make everyone run away from me in fear most of the time, any town officials/guards' first instinct was to gut me and ask questions later, et cetera. So long as I made rational decisions I usually got through them. I was the young one in the party and so I was generally abused but never killed :)

      Even neverwinter nights was good enough to frustrate minmaxing. Having a low CHA in that game was a real drag. A good DM will definitely put you in situations where you need someone attractive in your party. In general if your whole party has a low cha and wisdom scores people in towns should have a strong distrust of you (more than they will for any other wandering band of armed lunatics, even) because you're ugly and you smell funny and you are a crappy conversationalist.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    91. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Well, you're right. D&D playing probably has a statistically small relationship to people's psychological well-being and if anyone's detached from reality it's probably the Israeli top-brass that are basing policy on this.
      But I still think the little statistical blip is in the direction of D&D being good for team-spirit, anyway. ;)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    92. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by mickyflynn · · Score: 1

      except they said that they are less trustworthy with secrets.

    93. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      It's silly that an article like this makes its way into /. The people who approve the articles like these should know better than to bring something where there are sensitivities on both sides of the fence.

      You're right. Let's never discuss this, or any other possibly inflammatory issue again

    94. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      People who role-play might be more inclined to game the system - definitely not a desirable personality trait to have in personnel deployed in sensitive positions.
      Leaving aside that they might be total and utter spods, and just a little bit silly.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    95. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      The God of Duty? Don't you mean Tempus or Tyr?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    96. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power Word: Kill

    97. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need the proper balance.

    98. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The problem with CHA is that it interferes with roleplaying, when you want to rollplay instead. Here I am, talking with the town guard (played by the DM) and all I can think is, "I wish I could just make a diplomacy roll instead of actually knowing what I'm supposed to say to talk myself out of trouble." It's hard to roleplay a character with a higher CHA than yourself.

      I'm a crappy conversationist, and I game to escape that! D'oh!

    99. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel does not just "happen" to have many Jews.

    100. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by domc · · Score: 1

      Why does Israel have a 'right to survive and defend' itself? An illegal occupying force does not have any right to continue their illegal activities.

      Palestine has a 'right to survive and defend' itself against an illegal occupation.

      Same thing goes for the current illegal occupation of Iraq. Do US soldiers have a 'right to survive and defend' themselves, when it is they whom are breaking international law?

      It is Iraq which has the 'right to survive and defend' itself.

      If tomorrow China invaded the US, would anybody beside the Chinese be talking about a 'right to survive and defend' themselves as they slaughtered the US population?

      Would you, as a US citizen feel that China had rights, or would you be rightfully defending yourself against an illegal occupation by any means that you had available to you?

      domc

    101. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by grungefade · · Score: 0

      Of course, because they dont want you dying for yourself. They want you to die for the team. If you die for yourself they loose their +2 vitality points.

    102. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Straight from the article: "They're detached from reality and suscepitble to influence," the army says. soooo....pretty much the exact opposite of what you said.

    103. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Dr.Zap · · Score: 1

      It really isn't anything wrong with the fact that they play D&D, just that they feel they should put it on thier resume that sends up the flags.

    104. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      After all, these people have some of the best clinical and occupational psychologists in the world working for them.

      Working for, and being headed by, are two very different things. I'm sure we've all seen our fair share of politicians with access to highly trained people in the scientific comunity who, despite that access, are able to maintain an incredible level of bias and ignorance on scientific matters.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    105. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Ravenscall · · Score: 0

      These are the same people that think they have a divine right to the land they live on?

      Who is disconnected from reality?

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
    106. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?
      Religous zealots?!
      What the hell are you talking about?! Where do you get your info?!
      Where do you come off saying ignorant BS like that?!

      The U.S. is MUCH more religeous than Israel.
      Do you know that the IDF accepts gays to its ranks?
      Did you know that Israel has women fighters in its ranks?
      Do you know that the IDF has Arabs, Druze, Christians fighting alongside Jews?

      I'm amazed over and over with you guys -
      Being ignorant is OK - But at least shut the f*ck up!!!

    107. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Ravenscall · · Score: 0

      These are the same "Intelligent" people that believe God told them 4,000 odd years ago that they have a divine mandate to live there?

      Who is disconnected from reality?

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
    108. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering the propensity for current IDF soldiers to shoot Palestinian civilians (under the blessing of the same command structure that condemns D&D players), you should be DIS-inclined to believe anything the IDF says.

      America isn't the only so-called civilized place with rightwingnuts who feel threatened by seculars and people who treat myths as myths and not as "historical documents". If anyone here is the risk, it's the guy who actually believes in things like demons and angels, as opposed to the player of a fantasy game who treats them as game elements.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    109. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Remember those noises it makes? It's diabolical laughter.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    110. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what - you are dead right!
      I'm so tired or people simply refusing to believe large governments or organisations who obviously have the intelligence and manpower to be right in a way "we" do not. Yes - Sadam did have WMD's and the US govt was spot on, yes - refuge children were thrown overboard a few years back, The aust. gov't was right - and dammit the Jews are all a lower caste of human who need to be wiped out... Hitler was right....

      oh wait, maybe I need to check up my cynicism...

    111. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D&D is a munchkin game where finding nice little ways to stack multipliers, work around GM ideas and generally be a prick is the norm....

      and you'd do well to ban anyone who is into Warhammer or its 40K varient's chaos armies too...

    112. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by kloidster · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I'm glad at least one person has the guts to agree with me.

    113. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      A number of my players in our regular DnD campaign are ex-Australian Army. I know quite a few people in gaming circles who are ex-speical forces from a number of countries and who currently work at the Australian Department of Defense. One of the common characteristics they have is an excelent understanding of tactics and strategy (which are different) and all excelled in manouevers.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    114. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Helm's the only lawful neutral god I could think of, sorry

    115. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by mcb · · Score: 1

      Tyr is lawful good, I wouldn't call the US army that...

      If you've ever read the Avatar series, Helm clearly shows his lawful neutral nature by not taking sides and simply following orders (from Ao), even though it led to the death of many of his fellow gods. Seems pretty close to most armies.

    116. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Could be worse, you could be chaotic neutral. YOu might decide it is more amusing to fire on your side, their side, yourself, no-one, the ground, grow petunias, etc...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    117. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Especially since 'expert' often means 'ex' as in former, and 'spurt' as in drip under pressure.

    118. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by MobyTurbo · · Score: 1
      few of the radical-right, orhtodox jews, serve in combat rolls in the IDF. Why? Because they're religious scholars and exempt from such duty. Yet, they are usually the ones howling the loudest about how it's their promised land
      You're confusing the Religious Zionists, who *do* serve in the army and attend Hesder yeshiva, and happen to be Modern Orthodox, with the "ultra" Orthodox who dress funny but aren't rigid Zionists and who's Rabbis have made rulings that land can be traded if and only if it saves lives.

      The question was, did giving land to Arafat save lives? That was debatable. Hopefully the new regime will be better, but I remain sceptical (but not doctrinaire) of the ability of a holocaust denier (Abbas) who's pledged to not fight his brothers in Hamas to be a true moderate.

    119. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by MobyTurbo · · Score: 1
      There was a point in time where ECT in mental institutions was commonplace because it was endorsed by the American Psychology Association.

      Today, we know that ECT only helps certain cases of clinical depression, and is used only in extreme cases when no other solution exists.

      If you go further back with the same association, they used to perform labotamies.

      Excellent post. Just want to add that lobotomies became popular due to the inventor of the proceedure getting a Nobel Prize in medicine for his "cure" for mental illness, and the popularity of the "icepick lobotomy" that could be performed by non-surgeons with local anasthesia (the patient would be forced to report how the proceedure was going to determine if enough brain damage had been done.)
    120. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by IronChef · · Score: 1

      D&D, and most other role-playing games are exactly the embodiment of this. They are about teams achieving things...

      Man, you must have had a great group with no backstabbing, self-centered halflings... or demented, unhelpful LG human clerics. Burn in hell, Kurt the Kleric, and your virtual clone, Eric the Cleric.

      The Ranger: "Kurt! Help, I need healing. I'm freaking dying over here!"
      Kurt the Kleric: "You aren't hurt that bad."

      or...

      DM: "Your ally lays still, bleeding out into the dirt."
      The Party: "Kurt, heal him! There is still time to save him."
      Kurt the Kleric: "No, I want his armor."

      Priceless.

    121. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Mister, they del with foreign religious idealogues every day. They're called "Muslims."

      So their solution to dealing with foreign religious idealogues is to become religious idealogues. There will be no end to that war.

      Thanks for stating your opinion. At least now we know you are incapable of telling the difference between the every-day Muslim and a terrorist.

    122. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      you son of a bastage!

      No, english is my first language, I just stopped caring.

      I should get points for using the correct spelling of 'cite'.

      me speak bad english! That's unpossible.

      Also I have a slight apraxia, and was beaten by an english teacher in the first grade.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    123. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by baudbarf · · Score: 1

      Here, here!

      --
      You can run but you can't hide, except, apparently, along the Afghan-Pakistani border.
    124. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Golias · · Score: 1

      The problem with that system is that you end up with strong fighters who are almost always complete idiots, clever wizards who can't lift their familiars of the ground without a system of pullies, and rogues who either build around a charisma of 18 (for deception skills) or 6 (because they don't care about what others think of them.)

      The whole idea of rolling multiple dice was to generate a "bell curve" distribution, so any ability over 15 was considered rare and exceptional. Over time, ability generation systems have become considerably more "munchkin friendly."

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    125. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You should try "Savage Worlds". Best damn system I have every played. Fun as hell, fast, and none of that skill minutia that infects other system. GURPS I'm looking at you...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    126. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by dilg · · Score: 1
      What was your level of clearance?

      My brother got High Security clearance in the Navy a couple years ago. The military spent months interviewing anyone who knew him from the cradle and beyond.

    127. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      This was for working at GCHQ (loosely the British equivalent of the NSA), and I think they were looking to clear them up to "Top Secret". This also meant full background checks, including interviews with people that know you, accounting for where you'd been in the last 10 or so years, that sort of thing.

    128. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      Same could be said for FPS gamers, or RTS gamers.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    129. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting
      WTF? "Game the system"? If you play D&D you realize that "gaming the system" gets you in Shitsville with the game referee (the much maligned "Dungeon Master"). So if anything, D&D players are LESS inclined to "game the system".
      Sorry, that doesn't follow. D&D players, or in my case Magic: the Gathering (and other CCGs) players, gain a better understanding of operational relationships are are able to "game the system", or play within the rules to get what you want.

      Such people are less desirable in an inflexible military system and more valuable in specialised operations.

    130. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by CoolGopher · · Score: 1
      Being in the military is, by necessity, to be part of a team and the team has to come first, D&D, and most other role-playing games are exactly the embodiment of this.

      You've obviously never sat in on one of our games. Backstabbing, plotting, scheming, and counter-scheming are all an integral part of the game. And it's all done in character! I still laugh my head off at the time when the cleric was knocked unconscious in a really bad situation involving lots of undeads, woke up just in time to have a chance to save himself only to discover that the thief had appropriated his holy mace under the pretext that the cleric obviously wasn't going to make it anyway, and the thief had more use of it!

      Not to mention when the druid jumped into a trap pit we'd dug to heal a monster we'd almost managed to kill, leaving the rest of the party to fend for themselves in that battle. Of course, she ended up nearly getting torn to shreds by said monster after she'd healed it, and she sobbed lots when we killed the monster to save her (well, save her and more importantly, us).

      Best one though was when the paladin started cutting down a tree to use as part of an ambush. The druid went wild and clocked the paladin with a stone from her sling, knocking him unconscious. She really was more in tune with nature than people, she really was =)

      Still, D&D is nothing compared to when we're playing Vampire. The only reason the coterie stays together is because of careful manipulations by the GM. I'd tell you about some of the more interesting plots I have in motion at the moment, but I know at least two of the group read /., so I won't :-P

    131. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by wealthychef · · Score: 1
      I'm guessing that the IDF pshrinks found that D&D gamers tend to be more indivualistic. Being in the military is, by necessity, to be part of a team

      To repeat an earlier post of mine, the article does not say that the Israeli army does not want D&D players, so your argument is irrelevant. It says they are not granted security clearances as easily. This is a different issue. I don't see a good reason for it. It implies that D&D players are not as good at keeping secrets. Upon reflection, I wonder how you can really design a good test for this criterion?

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    132. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so the missing hard disks were for backing up the D&D characters :)

    133. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Makoss · · Score: 1

      Which, if you ever have read a transcript of, you will find to be potentially the most chilling and disturbing thing you've ever read.

      There is nothing that makes me squeamish, except the destruction of the mind (i.e. head injuries). Ugh.

      --
      Building a better backup.
      Zettabyte Storage
    134. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If these folks actually have the "best clinical and occupational psychologists", then why is that the Israelis do not understand the psychology of suicide bombers and the root cause of such thinking ? Sounds like they need to focus on disgruntled Palestinians and not youth playing D&D.

    135. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you meant to say "Hear, hear!"?

    136. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Well, it seems that my players are very mature then, none of them have more than two scores above 16, they have well rounded characters overall...

      Helps that all of us knew of (and hated) munchkin players and DMs

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    137. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      Every team needs a Face Man.

    138. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      But then again every team needs a Murdock and a Mr. T and a Hannibal, too. Amy was even a crucial element in a few episodes.

    139. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      But sometimes you want to have an Aragorn AND a Samwise. One dude got all boxcars, and the other one got alot of snakeyes. But Rudy's still a star, and Viggo will never be half the man Legolas is.

    140. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      One of those priority traits may be simply "lack of physical stamina." If you played D&D instead of Football in high school, you might not be as good a soldier. Or salesman. Even though you'd think roleplaying would make for improved sales technique, statistics do not bear it out.

    141. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kennedy was convicted and sentenced, and served his sentence. George W. Bush, on the other hand, had Daddy cover his drunk driving arrest up. The only difference is that GWB didn't have to drive over a causeway once he got off Walker's Point.

    142. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by freshman_a · · Score: 1


      it can be done to an *involuntarily* committed patient, against their expressed will

      uh, no. patients need to sign a consent form in order for ECT to be performed.

      There's still enough whack-job psychiatrists out there who think it works (it doesn't)

      actually, it's been shown to work in many cases, maybe not 100%, but it works a lot of the times.

      my girlfriend is a counselor in a psychiatric hospital. she has helped administer ECT and has seen it work.

      learn before you post.

    143. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw one yesterday. He was evicting an orphanage from the house they rented from him.

    144. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by tooba · · Score: 1

      By what logic is Israel occupying Palestine illegally? Were it not for the fact that Israel was attacked by forgein armies with the aim to destroy them, they would still be living within their original borders. Is it wrong for them to seize land that they found to be a defensive necessity in the face of aggressive invaders? And what Palestine is being occupied? Last I checked, there had never been an independent Palestinian state.

      Don't get me wrong. I do believe that a Palestinian state is in the cards somewhere down the line. I just question the logic of your statements. You seem to have the argument backwards. If China were to invade the U.S. it would have been up to the U.S. to make sure it had a strong army with which to protect its "right" to survive.

      You seem to be quick to jump to using the term "illegal occupation." Saying something is illegal connotes that it has broken some law. As far as I know, no international law has been broken by the United State's occupation of Iraq. And, while some countries have decried Israel's actions regarding Palestine, its quite far fetched to call it illegal. You may consider it immoral, unjust, or likewise undesireable, but that does not make it illegal.

      Which brings me to another point- no state has a "right to survive." It is more like an obligation. If a given state fails to ensure its survival, it will disappear. Likewise, if a state fails to defend itself in the face of an invading army, it will be destroyed.

      The fact is, the world does not turn on human desires. The strong will survive, or, more accurately, those that do not survive will be considered weak by those that surpass them. If Israel wants to decide to not give confidental secrets to those who play D&D, fine. That's their prerogative.


      Tryba

    145. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      CCGs are not roleplaying games, so your post is irrelevent.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    146. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've been playing since 76? Do you still live in your mom's basement? Time to grow up.

    147. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by lymph · · Score: 1
      I was under the impression that you roll 4d6 and pick the highest 3 to get an ability score. And if you roll under 10, you reroll so your character isn't weak.

      7th Lvl - STR 10, DEX 18, CON 14 INT 14, WIS 13, CHA 19...is this an example of an unbalanced char?

    148. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D&D3E promotes bell curve characters by making the attribute point cost nonlinear.

      If I remember correctly ...

      Minimum starts at 8
      9-14 cost 1 point each
      15-16 cost 2 points each
      17-18 cost 3 points each
      Maximum is 18
      Racial modifiers act on top of that.

      The problem I see with this is that it promotes characters that are too median in every attribute. With the exception of a wizard or druid, every character is made with a 14 in every stat other than Charisma.

    149. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've only used 3e rules in NwN but I can vouch that all my stats were pretty much 14's, although I usually had one or two stats 12's so I could get a 16 in intelligence (nothing beats a few extra skillpoints/level, esp for a ranger/mage)

    150. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are in fact testicles, and yes, them getting snagged on things could cause problems.

    151. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by The+Desert+Palooka · · Score: 1

      "
      *restricted communication with family and friends
      *detachment: sleeping away from home / placed in strange environment
      etc...
      "

      Sounds like the office...

    152. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 1
      The problem with that system is that you end up with strong fighters who are almost always complete idiots, clever wizards who can't lift their familiars of the ground without a system of pullies, and rogues who either build around a charisma of 18 (for deception skills)

      You sound like you're describing the cast of 8-bit Theater. :-)

    153. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by domc · · Score: 1

      Look up the many UN resolutions against Israel -- which normally only the US vetoes.

      Look up the UN Secretary General's comments about the illegal US invasion of Iraq.

      Look back through history at the many atrocities the US, UK, Israel, etc have committed against the peoples of this world.

      domc

      BTW, '...If China were to invade the U.S. it would have been up to the U.S. to make sure it had a strong army with which to protect its "right" to survive.'

      Your logic says that people don't have a right to survive if they don't have an army to protect them. By that logic, we would have the right to invade any country that doesn't have an army that can stand up to ours? You must be a Bush supporter...

    154. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Only if you got a really crappy GM with NO imagination.
      Unless by 'game the system' you really mean cheat.
      In my game we had untill recently a guy who as a matter of reflex built characters who had at least one impossible seeming ability. Most recently it was an ranger(archer choices) with a plus to hit that was about two to three times what you would expect for his level. He simply looked at his roles and planed ahead min/maxing for that. His other abilities and stats were normal to slightly (approx 1/2 level) behind.
      The reason he WAS in our group is he graduated with a degree in economics and just got hired by some department of something in DC. And considering how well he crunched the numbers for his characters I sincerly hope he gets to help with the economy at some point.
      To get back to my point, early on I found out if an arrow could hit it, it'd take massive damage fast and compensated a good portion of the time (not always, no fun playing a grand master archer or whatever if he never gets to show his stuff).
      He's a big reason how they survived so long.
      Now I can see where a petty, braindead, asshole gm might penalize him for his cleverness somehow. But I refuse to be that kind of gm.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    155. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      They(3.5) aren't as broad in scope as GURPS, but they do have the advantage not being so generic.
      GURPS can feel like your bassically doing the same two rolls over and over again. (so can almost any game though, it's just a tad easier in GURPS)
      I guess my point here is that D&D has a clear feel to it, a unique flavor if you will, that GURPS lacks outside the specific world books.
      GURPS is a jack of all trades, master of none. D&D 3.5 is great for it's genre, Tolkienish fantasy. But you'll notice how much re-working d20 needs to work for star wars or it's spy genre, and the fit sometimes feels akward even still.
      FWIW GURPS and (A)D&D are the two game systems I've consistantly collected over the years (two decades plus) and have probably spent a couple grand on each system while spending less a tenth that on all other systems.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    156. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Any Gm that can't handle anything but a narrow range of characters and has to kill off anyone trying to play a character they LIKE has no imagination.
      I've played with min/maxers (been one, been a pure rollist, etc. gm'd all the above, etc.)
      The trick for a gm is to make the game FUN, or at least make it possible to be fun.
      If the player can legitimately create a really good character without cheating and enjoys such a character, let him play it, it's the gm's fault if that alone is enough to wreck the game.
      Gamming is about fun, everyone want's a 'cool' character and newbies are most prone to think it's a min'maxed character. Now usually they'll grow out of it and start looking for characters that are interesting. But sometimes that's a character who in some way is outstanding. The trick for the gm is to give the character a chance to shine, just not at the expense of the rest of the party. Hopefully each character gets that chance.
      A friend of mine I've been playing with for about two years just left for DC to accept a government job after getting his degree in economics. He's always played a somewhat min/maxed character, in part because that's what cool for him, but in part because NOT juggling the numbers would be alien to him I suspect. So sometimes they got to meet dangers out in the open where he could shoot first (ranger/archer) and quite often had over a +30 to hit (I LOOKED for cheating on his char sheet, I looked for some glitch in his numbers, never do that with a numbers guy unless you are one, he was legit) at level 14.
      I also have a guy with >30 ac while wearing NO armour. So occasionally he deals with magic just as the archer can get bum-rushed in a small inn.
      Or sometimes vice/versa. If you play at times to thier strengths and at times to thier weaknesses it's fun because sometimes they have to work thier asses off and sometimes they hand the enemy thier asses without getting up from dinner.
      It about fun. You just have to have the imagination to gm (most people do, but need practice) and perserverance to learn to use it rather than blame the player for 'wrecking' the game. This is where most have trouble, I sure did at first not having any CLUE how to handle a party thinking of something I didn't. Remember the player deosn't usually want to wreck your game, he want's to have fun and is depending on your help not anger with what they want to do.
      Yes it's harder to GM someone with a char that's the same old borring char we've all seen a thousand times, but IMNSHO it's worth it.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    157. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      You hit the tricky part(IMHO) right on the head, Charisma and social skills are particualarly difficult.
      The trick with being a gm is how to balance the role playing part with the skill roles here.
      I've generally let the player lead it a bit in that if they really want to try and just roleplay it I minimize the rolling, If the player (or me I sometimes admit) are dealing with an unfamiliar situation I sub a roll for the actuall knowledge but keep the roleplaying in to get the gist or angle being used.
      It's never just a 'bluff roll to see the guard lets you through'. But roll-playing to see if it's "i'm to important to stop or check on' or 'me? I'm just a messenger' or what have you and use that to guide the meaning (and limit) of the rolls results.
      If the unarmored halfling pulls a 'I'm just a harmless waif' routing he's far more likely to pull it off with a good roll than the platemail wearing half-orc fighter, who might pull off the 'duh high I'm err dahht is I'm errr.. Oh yeah snorttles, dahh king say i go dere, fight enemies hard if they comes here' routine though that would likely get the elf stared at quick walked to the local loony bin.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    158. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      As a GM (DM), I find players who bully other players/GMs to not be the people I want to invite round to my house to play games with.
      If a player REALLY wants to play Mr-String-Of-18s, sure let them ... once ...
      "You have been hit by 23 poison darts. save against each or die."
      "The Contessa is interested in hearing about your tales of adventure ... please recite me a story ... no, not roll your CHA, I'll take it into account. tell the story."
      "the Inquisitors have become interested in your freakishly inhuman abilities. "

      A GM who can't come up with an unreasonable way of killing/capturing/disabling an unreasonable player needs to work more on his 5k1llz.

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
    159. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, the background check were intense. What I was saying is that I never had to talk to a psychologist, as the gp was saying.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    160. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Live by rules from a group of scocialpathic egos?

      What a great idea for a game!

    161. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      For 7th level, its not too unbalanced.

      However, if someone tried to get those scores for a first level character, I would ask them to reroll

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    162. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by tooba · · Score: 1

      No, I did not say that people dont have a right to survive- I said that a state as an entity does not have an innate right to survive. Yes, that means that without an army, a state has no power to ensure its continued existance.

      And no, I am not a Bush supporter. I am an adamant Bush detractor. I did not support the Iraq invasion, but I also do not believe that the state of affairs right now is illegal. The sad fact is, the US has put Iraq into a position where it cannot support its own weight, and the occupation, however undesirable, is necessary for the best case (in both Iraq and the US's interest) outcome.

      I simply took issue with your logic. I understand that the UN has filed resolutions agains Israel, but I also understand that Israel will have resolutions against it no matter what they do. The fact is, they exist in a region where a sizeable number of nations, some of which control a large amount of oil and therefore sway with other countries, want to see Israel disappear. Remember, the world's anti-semitism has been proven again and again.

      And yes, as far as innate rules of the universe go, having an army does give one the "right" to invade a country that does not have an army. I'm confused by the way you use the word "right," though. I would say that a state as an entity has no God (or whatever) given rights.

      Additionally, your list of countries that have committed atrocities against humanity is far too short. It would probably be easier to come up with a list of those that have committed none. You cannot tell me that Iraq and the Palestinians have a clean history.


      Tryba

    163. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by sionki · · Score: 1

      I guess it would also be applicable to ask these recruits if they ever played "Make Believe" as a child. I have enjoyed many a good game of D&D in my life and do not consider myself apt to detach myself from reality or looking to "game" the system to my advantage. I do think that it taught me to think "Out of the Box" and how to Run through scenerios before committing to an action. By the way, I was in the service for 10 years with a very high Top Secret Security Clearance and received several awards for my "Problem Resolution" skills.

    164. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first map on the second link is a lie. It takes the vast amounts of land that were unpopulated and calls it "Palestinian Land".

    165. Re:IDF has smart people working for them ... by adamisklingon · · Score: 1

      actually, no. The orthodox jews-the "scholars", don't serve in the military, but most of them don't acknowledge israel's existance, either, as lon gas the messiah hasn't come. the "heavily armed" ones--the ones in settlments in palestinian territories however, do serve in the military, and are proud of it. you've mixed two very different schools of thought in judaism and in israeli society.

  2. D&D Out, Marijuana In??? by lecithin · · Score: 1


    "We have discovered that some of them are simply detached from reality," a security source told Ynetnews.

    And treating soldiers with marijuana will help?

    http://www.hightimes.com/ht/news/content.php?bid=2 9&aid=24 :)

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:D&D Out, Marijuana In??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup, pot is great for helping one sleep and chasing away the bad feelings. 'Course it also encourages free thinking which most military services (and govts) don't approve of...

    2. Re:D&D Out, Marijuana In??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused. When I read those personal ads about the swinger couple who is D&D Free, I didn't think it had anything to do with dragons!

    3. Re:D&D Out, Marijuana In??? by ptlis · · Score: 1

      It worked for the Hashishins.

      --
      There's mischief and malarkies but no queers or yids or darkies within this bastard's carnival, this vicious cabaret.
    4. Re:D&D Out, Marijuana In??? by Byzantine · · Score: 1

      Pot encourages free thinking? Please. Pull the other one, it has bells on. Potheads are the most congregational bunch of sheep I've ever seen in my life. That their ovine tendencies are slightly askew with regard to the mainstream norm does not invalidate the point.

    5. Re:D&D Out, Marijuana In??? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I could see how a big-ass smoke grenade, lobbed over to the other side, might help your soldiers.

    6. Re:D&D Out, Marijuana In??? by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 1

      Yeah, all those rock stars and rappers and gangsters and poets and physicists are a real bunch of sheep alright, especially compared to a Ford-truck drivin' mesh-hat wearin' Budweiser-drinkin' rugged individualist such as yourself.

      Or are you just so stupid that you don't know it?

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    7. Re:D&D Out, Marijuana In??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would imagine you don't know a lot of dope smokers, then. The ones I know range from college students to gas station attendants to network administrators to professional athletes to CEOs.

      I'd bet you don't know that many. Maybe you're the sheep for sucking on DARE's tit.

    8. Re:D&D Out, Marijuana In??? by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      Your demonstrably-incorrect generalisation, in line with the ridiculous 'Drugs War' propaganda of your country, has surely persuaded us all of your own individualist free-thinking though!

    9. Re:D&D Out, Marijuana In??? by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 1

      I forgot to add:

      ...slashdot-postin'...

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    10. Re:D&D Out, Marijuana In??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Potheads are the most congregational bunch of sheep I've ever seen in my life.

      I wonder if they all belong to the same church. Maybe he meant confrontational.

  3. I like D&D by ect5150 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like D&D. But after seeing some of those pics (before the slashdot effect), I frown on it too!

    --
    I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.
    1. Re:I like D&D by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Yes, but pics of a typical D&D session don't make such good art. There are exceptions, of course.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    2. Re:I like D&D by scalis · · Score: 1

      Pictures? I like this video from their training camp a whole lot better.... http://gprime.net/video.php/magicmissile

      --

      True ravers don't need drugs
    3. Re:I like D&D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just wondering where the pamphlet about the evils of Christian priesthood can be found. I mean, first they lure kids into their occult ceremonies by telling them they'll burn forever if the don't attend, then they get the kids to pledge their loyalty to a half-man, half-god abomination and engage in rituals where they actually consume said abomination's blood and body. If you're really dedicated, you can eventually become a priest and take part in the organized child molestation events.

    4. Re:I like D&D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, from the wacko Jesus-freak? Yeah, lets all drink his cool-aid!!!

  4. It Could Be Worse by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think the IDF is going a little overboard, here. I mean, it's just D&D; it's not like they're going around eating cheeseburgers and shellfish, or something crazy like that.

    Heck, you'd think they'd get a leg up for it--for example, as D&D precludes any and all contact with females, they run no risk of sexual transgression whatsoever!

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:It Could Be Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cheeseburgers and shellfish? I like my shellfish ON cheeseburgers. Pass me another bacon swiss shrimpburger, please.

    2. Re:It Could Be Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm...you must have a limited circle of friends. Our weekly D&D session has 3 women of 7 players, 4 of 8 if you count my 6 month old daughter who seems desparate to get ahold of all the dice and character sheets lately...and for some reason we play the tanks in the party!

    3. Re:It Could Be Worse by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This sounds like nothing more than a new version of the old "roleplayers are unstable" line. Whaddya want to bet that some recruiting officer watched Tom Hanks' early movie Monsters and Mazes and thought "Oh boy, those roleplayers must be nuts".

      This movie has to be, despite being horribly scripted and acted, one of the most damaging things done to roleplaying. What's really funny is that Hanks' real-life counterpart didn't go nuts, but in fact had a gay liason and made up the story.

      I've had a very Fundie Christian relative who started blabbing off about how roleplaying was letting Satan into your heart with all that magic and fantastical creatures (geez... anybody read the Bible lately). I've seen articles saying my hobby is Satanic.

      Are there fucked-up roleplayers? You bet. I've played with one real whacko who used to keep a list of the right and wrong things his players did, and when it hit five wrongs, he'd have his character try to kill their's. But you're going to find lunatics in any walk of life, whether hobby or occupation.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:It Could Be Worse by marcop · · Score: 1

      Well, sometimes, they can be rather crazy.

      {yes, site is a porn site, just right-click/save-as}

    5. Re:It Could Be Worse by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Are there fucked-up roleplayers? You bet. ...But you're going to find lunatics in any walk of life, whether hobby or occupation.

      Especially people who are so overzealous about religion that they can't deal with a little make-believe.

    6. Re:It Could Be Worse by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Especially people who are so overzealous about religion that they can't deal with a little make-believe.

      Well, this is the same calibre of people who find pro-gay messages in Sponge Bob and Teletubbies. I've known quite a few roleplayers in fairly fundementalist churches who have had to abandon their hobby after being pressured or outright threatened with being given the boot. I think it's sad, and I do get mad that a perfectly reasonable and enjoyable recreational hobby is so misunderstood and maligned.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:It Could Be Worse by Jason+Ford · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've had a very Fundie Christian relative who started blabbing off about how roleplaying was letting Satan into your heart with all that magic and fantastical creatures.

      In his autobiography 'Black Boy', Richard Wright recalls his grandmother's attitude towards his writing. She believed that fiction was the work of the Devil. Paraphrasing: 'You writin' down things that ain' true. Tha's the Devil's work, boy.' (My apologies to Richard Wright for my crude approximation of his characteristic style.)

      Things are getting a little better as time goes on, I hope.

      --
      I did not become a vegetarian for my health, I did it for the health of the chickens. --Isaac Bashevis Singer
    8. Re:It Could Be Worse by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 2, Insightful
      hyperbole 1. Rhet. A figure of speech consisting in exaggerated or extravagant statement, used to express strong feeling or produce a strong impression, and not intended to be understood literally.

      Can't a guy poke fun at idiotic stereotypes without somebody actually thinking I seriously believe that all people who play D&D are male and will never feel the warmth of a woman's touch?

      Seriously, are you really that incapable of parsing written English? Do I need to start add little disclaimers to everything I write?

      DISCLAIMER: although the author (AAiP) questions your critical reading skills, under no circumstances does he mean to suggest that you are unintelligent, too literal, foolish, ugly, simple-minded, easily-duped, gullible, dense, or otherwise sub-par in any respect. For the purposes of this and future interactions, AAiP will assume that your social and intellecual traits are within one standard deviation of the mean, based on humanity as a whole, excepting those cases where your social and intellectual skills are substantially higher than said mean. Though one could infer that the tone of this disclaimer is decidedly snide, AAiP assures you that it really isn't. He just wants to make sure he's being absolutely, positively, perfectly crystal clear on this, beyond any suggestion of an inkling of a hint of a trace of a shadow of a doubt. Really. You're swell.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    9. Re:It Could Be Worse by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      Things are getting a little better as time goes on, I hope.

      I dunno. The new generation of kids don't seem to like anything that you don't pop a CD into and have a game controller attached to. Table top RPGs seem to be faltering. I still have a few old friends who I have been playing with for years, and I run a PBEM. The Internet has been the real salvation of the RPG, but the class table-top game is looking pretty weak.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:It Could Be Worse by MBGMorden · · Score: 1
      Tell me about it. When I was young I was forced by my mother to give up Magic: The Gathering because she thought it was Satanist. I had one friend who's GURPS materials were all burnt by his parents and another whose parents forced him to give up on D&D and M:TG in favor of Christian religiously themed CCG's and RPG's.

      It's all a bit ridiculous really. I still consider myself a Christian but the extremist viewpoints have pushed me towards simply practicing my faith outside of an organized group.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    11. Re:It Could Be Worse by cynyr · · Score: 1

      see theres this funny thing about the group I play with i guess..... of the 6 PC's 3 are women, and 3 are men.... we just got done with a mini campain set in that same world, i was a black dragon and had a pet nymph that was yes a PC and another member of the group....so i guess my groups is just weird

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    12. Re:It Could Be Worse by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

      The kids really seem to be into the card based games, so the end may not be as nigh as one might think.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    13. Re:It Could Be Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, wait, wait -- are you saying the sounds those miniatures made when I threw them in the fire *weren't* really screams of agony?

    14. Re:It Could Be Worse by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      Well, I guess we'll see. It does seem that video game RPGs have become sufficiently intricate and reactive that in some ways they can emulate the complexities and depth of table-top gaming.

      I myself much prefer table top games, and even PBEMs because of the interaction of the players. The roleplaying I enjoy is a social event.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    15. Re:It Could Be Worse by asscore · · Score: 0

      You think thats fucked up. I personally know a person who THINKS (in real life) that he is a dungeon master. He has been arrested multiple times for brandishing a sword in public. He thinks he can call invisible dragons to his aid. He calls himself a sage or elf, or some other imaginary damn thing. I dont blame this on satan tho.... just the fact that he's prolly INSANE.

    16. Re:It Could Be Worse by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Too bad that disclaimer won't fit in the sig line, eh?

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    17. Re:It Could Be Worse by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The new generation of kids don't seem to like anything that you don't pop a CD into and have a game controller attached to."

      You're generalizing. Video games are very popular, but so are collectable card games, comics, tabletop roleplaying, miniatures gaming (D&D Minis are HOT on eBay right now, and kids are buying most of them for "warbands"), etc.

      I suggest you think of kids as very small adults, and then imagine the generalization, "these adults these days aren't interested in any OS that doesn't have a "Start" button."

    18. Re:It Could Be Worse by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of christian religions that don't have these wacky paranoid ideas, and understand that having an imagination is okay, and that they can trust their parishioners to understand what's real and what's fantasy.

      I was raised in the United Church of Christ, and while I don't practice much anymore, they were always an accepting group.

    19. Re:It Could Be Worse by operagost · · Score: 1
      I don't see how one black grandma represents all fundamentalist Christians. There is no prohibition against writing fiction in the Bible, whatsoever. Writing a story is not "bearing false witness" unless you claim it's true. The closest is the prohibition against making graven images, so in theory she might have an argument if he was painting portraits.

      In fact, Jesus often used parables, and others wrote them down. So is Jesus or the Gospel writer the sinner?

      What does this have to do with the IDF anyway, which is mostly composed of Jews, both ethnic and religious?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    20. Re:It Could Be Worse by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's what Christianity is: willful, self-imposed blindness, known to the faithful as "True Faith". It's turning a blind eye to the evils that underlie the belief, and believing, on faith, things that are not and cannot be true.

      As a person married to a Catholic, I find the above generalization ludicrous, and of the same kind of rudimentary thinking as that which leads people to say roleplayers are devil-worshipping lunatics. Whatever Christianity's sources (and it's a lot more complex than simply an offshoot of Judaism), there are a lot of good Christians out there, and to malign them because of those who act badly is pretty fallacious.

      Consider a short list of the utter lies Christians forced down the world's throat! Papal Infalibility: "The Pope is never Wrong! If you argue, you'll meet the Pope's soldiers.",

      As I suspected, you actually have not the foggiest idea what Papal Infallability is. It is not a general notion where ever word a Pope utters is undeniable truth. It only applies when a Pope is speaking ex cathedra. Now I totally disagree with all of this, because I'm an atheist and I think the Church's theological teachings are bunk, but I think it's always important to actually understand what you disagree with. What you've done, though you clearly hate Christianity, is throw up a rather classic Protestant distortion of a basic tenet of Papal theology and authority.

      Or to put it in simpler terms, you are spreading a lie.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    21. Re:It Could Be Worse by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Well I'm not trying to malign Christianity in general. One of the guys I roleplay with is reasonably devout, and I know of a number of individuals who are roleplayers and regular church-goers. It's that particular breed of Puritanical fags-and-satanists-in-every-corner kind of Christian I'm referring to. The kind that might even call you non-Christian because you don't believe precisely as they do.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    22. Re:It Could Be Worse by Jason+Ford · · Score: 1

      I don't see how one black grandma represents all fundamentalist Christians.

      Good, because she doesn't. You should notice I wrote, "She believed that fiction was the work of the Devil", and not, "Fundamentalist Christians believed that fiction was the work of the Devil." My point is that you don't hear too many people making this claim nowadays.

      There is no prohibition against writing fiction in the Bible, whatsoever.

      Granted. But where did I make that claim? Or were you responding to someone else's post?

      In fact, Jesus often used parables, and others wrote them down. So is Jesus or the Gospel writer the sinner?

      I'm afraid that Richard Wright's grandmother is long dead, so we won't be able to ask her this question. (Well, at least not in this life, anyway.)

      What does this have to do with the IDF anyway, which is mostly composed of Jews, both ethnic and religious?

      Absolutely nothing. You're pretty sharp today. My reply was a response to the grandparent's post. If you'd like, he and I could take the conversation offline. I should note, however, that my reply is currently at '+5, Interesting', so at least some people found this more interesting than they found it offtopic.

      --
      I did not become a vegetarian for my health, I did it for the health of the chickens. --Isaac Bashevis Singer
    23. Re:It Could Be Worse by Etherael · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, just from reading here for a really long time now and seeing the continuous christian comments and such, am I to conclude that in America, being christian is actually "cool"? Here in Australia it's a step back or forward from a slap in the face depending on your individual situation I suppose, but of almost everyone I know it's several steps *past* a slap in the face to be called a "christian". It really has that foaming at the mouth whacky fundamentalist with crazed eyes stigma over here.

    24. Re:It Could Be Worse by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1
      Christian religiously themed CCG's and RPG's.


      Such as D&D?

      You have to wonder if all those people ever actually read the New Testament. Most of the magic in the game is based on biblical events and refrences. At least the divine stuff.

      D&D is a combination of christian doctrine, medival folklore, Tolkien's works, and mixes of other things.
    25. Re:It Could Be Worse by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

      Of course, in the U.S. playing D&D means you can read a Chart, use a table, use a map, and maybe even draw one, and given that level of education you really should be college ;-].

      But, the real truth is not that D&D was the work of Satan, but that AD&D 2nd ed. was a plot to stear impressionable young people into the horrors of Accounting, or tax consultanting.

    26. Re:It Could Be Worse by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't see how one black grandma represents all fundamentalist Christians. There is no prohibition against writing fiction in the Bible, whatsoever. Writing a story is not "bearing false witness" unless you claim it's true. The closest is the prohibition against making graven images, so in theory she might have an argument if he was painting portraits.

      I don't think anybody is saying that she does represent the sum total of Fundementalist Christianity. However, you have to admit, there are a number of Christian groups out there, particularly of the more conservative, fundementalist nature, who have some pretty strong opinions on things like roleplaying. Jack Chick isn't some sort of isolate, though he, like the grandma mentioned, may be closer to the far end of the spectrum.

      In fact, Jesus often used parables, and others wrote them down. So is Jesus or the Gospel writer the sinner?

      I think the old joke about how Jesus would be treated if he were alive today is applicable here.

      What does this have to do with the IDF anyway, which is mostly composed of Jews, both ethnic and religious?

      Mainly the fact that it appears that the IDF has some prejudices against roleplayers that don't seem to be founded on fact, and resemble prejudices among some Christian groups here in North America.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    27. Re:It Could Be Worse by thomasa · · Score: 1

      Steve Earle says that a Pistol is the Devil's Right hand.

    28. Re:It Could Be Worse by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      "Christian" generally means a follower/believer of Jesus Christ. So it's applied generally to all sorts of people who claim to follow Christ, regardless of how that manifests in their actions or religious practices.

      Are you saying that there are no moderate christians in australia? Or is it just that you call people protestants, or catholics, or presbyterians (etc.) and only call people "christian" if they were really psycho fundamentalist?

    29. Re:It Could Be Worse by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You have to admit, tinky winky or whoever looks and acts pretty gay. And, if the people who are writing the show are well-rounded individuals, then maybe they actually are thinking about the potential for representing diversity in their characters for some reason other than just not having them all look the same - which would be mandated by the pressure of "market research" anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:It Could Be Worse by Etherael · · Score: 1

      I could just be hugely sheltered, but definitely in my immediate circle of friends and associates, noone talks about religion at all unless it's to poke fun at the religious people, people are either weak or strong atheist, or more often agnostic as far as I'm aware. Generally if someone actually admitted they were religious in any of the circles I'm aware of it'd be asking for a bit of a ribbing at the least, and the more devout they were the more ostracised they'd be until they were just dismissed out of hand as thoroughly crazy.

    31. Re:It Could Be Worse by wtrmute · · Score: 1

      Damn, that's sad.

      So you say that people are ostracized if they don't think like the norm of the group... Where have I seen that before?

      And you actually want to be associated with that kind of people?

    32. Re:It Could Be Worse by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Yup, you're hugely sheltered.

      There are lots of people who consider themselves religious but aren't nutjobs - my family for example. They believe the bible is partially historical, but mostly a moral guide not meant to be taken literally.

      If you / your friends ridicule religious people simply because they're religious, then you're just as bigoted as the fundamentalists.

    33. Re:It Could Be Worse by Etherael · · Score: 1
      I don't mind, as I consider what they're being ostracised for personally to be an offense against rational objective thought, it's more complex than they're disowned for thinking different, that's almost irrelevant.

      Anyway, I didn't even want to really get into the discussion in terms of right and wrong true and false, I don't believe there's any value in organised religion at all and nothing but a rational argument, which can't exist by the nature of religion, can dissuade me from that belief.

      I was just curious with regards to social stigma in America, the "it's cool to be christian" attitude strikes me as so absurdly foreign I was actually having a bit of trouble coming to grips with it, but based on the repsonses I've received so far I'm led to believe that this is indeed the case.

    34. Re:It Could Be Worse by Jason+Ford · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember hearing that the Catholic Church banned the use of the fork as an eating utensil after its invention.

      From http://www.bartcop.com/0159.htm:

      "[Sam Waterston] said the fork wasn't invented until the 1400's, and it was immediately banned by the Catholic Church as, 'a tool of the devil.'"

      (I'm sorry that I couldn't find a more reputable source.)

      --
      I did not become a vegetarian for my health, I did it for the health of the chickens. --Isaac Bashevis Singer
    35. Re:It Could Be Worse by Etherael · · Score: 1

      Noone goes out of their way to ridicule the religious on principle, that would be a hallmark of insecurity, the only mention it gets in passing is a general reference to mental instability as a hallmark of the religious, but certainly irrational proselytizing (if that's not a tautology) to anyone I know is tantamount to asking for a "fuck you", sure.

    36. Re:It Could Be Worse by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Can't a guy poke fun at idiotic stereotypes without somebody actually thinking I seriously believe that all people who play D&D are male and will never feel the warmth of a woman's touch?

      *poke* I touch myself? I wonder if it was warm?

      :)

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    37. Re:It Could Be Worse by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "You're swell."

      are you coming on to me?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    38. Re:It Could Be Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are you saying that there are no moderate christians in australia?

      You mean there's something moderate in Funny Talking Upside Down Land? I thought they had twelve-gallon cans of beer which they heated on the barbie and then dipped their penises in before making love to their women (or their kangaroos, whichever is closer).

    39. Re:It Could Be Worse by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Personally I haven't found much in the current realm of RPGs that really interests me. Looking over my bookshelves I realize that everything I like is at least a generation or two old. Most of the major RPG companies are dead no more FASA or West End Games, TSR is now just a part of WOTC. It's a new world and unless you like D20 a lot of it is gone.

      Maybe it's just because I'm a holdout, but I find very little to get excited about in the current role-playing market.

    40. Re:It Could Be Worse by Deinesh · · Score: 1

      I've played with one real whacko who used to keep a list of the right and wrong things his players did, and when it hit five wrongs, he'd have his character try to kill their's.
      GOod thing he is getting his aggression out on D&D, otherwise, the fifth time you returned the movie you borrowed from him - LATE...

    41. Re:It Could Be Worse by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      The pro-gay message in Spongebob isn't in the show -- it's in a pledge linked to by some Spongebob promo materials: basically, 'I won't be an ass to anyone just because they're a different race, religeon, or sexual orientation'

      Take a look.

    42. Re:It Could Be Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever Christianity's sources (and it's a lot more complex than simply an offshoot of Judaism), there are a lot of good Christians out there, and to malign them because of those who act badly is pretty fallacious.

      Can't I malign them for their free choice of faith? They choose to join an order that defies reason, intellectual honesty, and basic human decency. They choose to worship a God whose sacred text commands them to kill on His dark whim. They choose to enforce blind faith over reason: to deny the evidence of their senses; and to perpetuate the myth of their faith for personal gain. If I can't malign that, what can I malign?

      Look at who we're talking about. This is an organization that as of less than 50 years ago, commanded voters to vote the way the Church ordered. This is an organization viewed women as men's property: to this day there are Christians who will argue that women must be forced to be subservient to men! This is a faith that as of 50 years ago believed that homosexuals were unnatural, and lobotomized them with misguided hormone treatments. Even today, in an era of (relative) peace and enlightment, I've been told that gays are "of the devil", by a man who was clearly ready to grab a queer-bashing bat. Sadly, these people aren't radicals: there's clear support in their scriptures to back all of these odious beliefs. In short, it's not the people: it's the religion. This is what Christianity is all about; and their own writings prove it! Some Christians remain fundamental about it; others must choose reject aspects of their faith in order to appease their conscience.

      However, all Christians are taught to reject reason, and embrace faith in it's place. There is NO evidence of their teachings: there is a lot against it. Yet they are taught, and teach others, to obey blindly, as a fundamental tenent of their religious teachings. That's a danger in our society to the present day, and it's no less true today than in the Dark Ages.

      For centuries, they've been fighting hard against the teachings of science, whenever the apparent facts contradict their comfortable lies. Christians argued against lightning rods, because that was tampering with the Holy Wrath of God. They tried to block dissection of human cadavers, because then we might learn that humans are fantastically complicated machines, not ephemera who live and die by the Breath of God Incarnate. There are cases of Christians in medical school who can't count the correct number of ribs on a human body because of their religious pre-conceptions. Right now, today, there are fundamentalist Christians trying to argue that evolution should not be taught in schools, or that their deliberate lies should be taught simultaneously with honest scientific discovery.

      Worst of all, they get to use my tax dollars to spread these lies: as of several years ago, Catholic schools are treated as legitimately as schools whose purpose is learning, rather than blind religious indoctrination. Other religions are pressing for the same rights; and it's just going to get worse, not better.

      Do you think the student who has been brainwashed in one of these schools will ever learn to see the bloody history of his dark Church with an unbiased eye? I don't see how it's possible.

      If the boy is taught that The Voice of God is good, and lack of faith is bad, then he may well end up like my friend's sister: unable to credit the evidence of her eyes; still strugling to believe what she was taught to believe all her life, even when she knows deep down it's not true. He'll bow to Christ the King; just as my friend's sister bowed to the king who brought her people famine and death.

      As I suspected, you actually have not the foggiest idea what Papal Infallability is. It is not a general notion where ever word a Pope utters is undeniable truth. It only applies when a Pope is speaking ex cathedra

      Oh, did I miss an obscure point of Catholic dogma? How t

    43. Re:It Could Be Worse by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Pretty much everyone, male or female, that reads Slashdot has a habit of touching themselves. With extreme frequency.

      Actually, come to think of it, I've never met anyone who doesn't, though lots of people say they don't.

      I'm of course completely aware that that's not what you meant, but go back and read it. You have to admit that it sounds pretty funny.

      I'll leave it at that.

    44. Re:It Could Be Worse by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      THAT explains it. We just lost a player to some government dept of something or other, seems he got a degree in Economics (close enough to acounting for me). (see some of my other posts about how the guy had a 14/1 ranger/rouge with a +#something to hit with his +2 longbow)
      I dunno which is more appropriate, but as someone who has played since 1.0 in 1980 I consider your lack of an insightfull or at least funny mod indicative of the youth of the current mods not mention an injustice.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    45. Re:It Could Be Worse by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      As a long time gamer let me confirm that yes your group is quite wierd.
      I've rarely seen anything in a game that wierd.
      though the whole dragon nymph thing is getting old.
      Imagine women gamming. How wierd can you get. That is outside of someones little sister playing for three games because she has a crush on one of the players, or her brother needed a another player and talked her into it. Though last time I saw that happen the guys 'little sister' was a 22 year old of outstanding err.. stats (19com..if you don't know that 7th stat you haven't gamed old school AD&D), unfortunately it wasn't me she was chasing.
      Serously though, odd campains like that start happening for the odd change up when your group's been gaming for a few years, especially if the group formed mainly from experienced gamers.
      We've done that sort of thing a few times.
      an interesting system to play mixed power level characters in is paladium's rifts. You can have two first level chars where one can take out marine regiment and the other one can't take a 50meter walk without getting winded.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    46. Re:It Could Be Worse by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      Why is that?

      Christianity is based upon the accepted historical fact that there was a guy called Jesus who lived in Israel about 2000 years ago. It's accepted by Jews, muslims etc that he was executed, but yet, a few days later his followers, who previously had been to scared to go outside, were standing in the temple proclaiming that Jesus had risen from the dead, and they were prepared to die for their belief. Now I don't know about you, but I've met too many people walking around who've been dead for 36 hours or so after being flogged, crucifed and stabbed with a spear. Now we can't say that this is all completely proven in a scientific sense, but what we can say is that the evidence for Jesus rising from the dead is good enough to stand in most courts of law.

      Jesus fulfilled over 200 prophecies from the old Jewish Bible, including many that predicted his death on the cross hundreds of years before it happened.

      This kind of thing doesn't just happen every day, and there are no really credible alternative explainations, so your left with acknowledging that Jesus was who he said he was, that is, the son of God.

      Of course, what you do with that knowledge is a different thing. You can ignore it and hope that God didn't really mean the things He said; that the God who created the universe 15 billion years ago was lying to us, or you can believe the words of the only man ever for whom there is no body. He said that we can become right with the God of the universe by simply accepting that Jesus was the scapegoat for all our sins, and by responding in love. No matter what you've done or who you are, Jesus paid the price of justice that God demanded and bought your life with his suffering.

      Why is this important? Because it means that righteousness is a gift and not something we cannot earn and boast about. Jesus reserved almost all of his critisism for the religious people of his day who wore their adherence to the rules as a badge, to the extent that the rules were more important than what they pointed to. They looked down on "sinners" like prostitutes and tax collectors, but those were the people Jesus spent time with. Today it might be drug dealers, pimps, prostitutes and other undesirables.

      Anyway, call me crazy if you like, but I say that trusting in Jesus makes life better. Someone who is close to Jesus will be full of love, joy (gladness of heart), peace, longsuffering (patience, having an even temper), gentleness (excellence in character, showing kindness), goodness (being good toward others), faithfulness, meekness (which is having no self interest) and temperance (self-control).

      Clearly anyone who has those kind of personality traits is someone best avoided!

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    47. Re:It Could Be Worse by Altus · · Score: 1



      I wonder about that. I have a friend that works with a lot of highschool and middle school age kids and according to him role playing games (primarily 3ird edition D&D) are becoming more mainstream amongst kids these days. Not quite mainstream enough to be considered common but far more than when we were that age.

      I suspect this might be a combination of WOtC owning D&D and making giving it a more out of the box game feel. Also, I suspect the popularity of the Lord of the Rings trilogy has brought this kind of fantasy thinking further into the mainstream.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    48. Re:It Could Be Worse by Altus · · Score: 1


      GURPs forever! Steve Jackson for president!

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    49. Re:It Could Be Worse by Discopete · · Score: 1
      The group I game with (Dm and Player) consists of 2 that will play anything put in front from, 1 who is just learning (but he's got a bent mind to begin with), 1 who knows nothing but 2nd ADnD Cleric (no speciality), 1 who thinks he knows everything and then quite often proves it (with regard to ADnD) and 1 who just is.

      I adamantly refuse to play or dm the new WoTC DnD (I also refuse to associate TSR with WoTC) I tried it once, never again.


      Perhaps I'm also a hold-out, but I must agree that there is very little to get excited about.

    50. Re:It Could Be Worse by superyooser · · Score: 1
      Dr. Dobson: Setting the Record Straight
      In truth, this tale has very little to do with SpongeBob himself, and everything to do with the media's ability to obscure the facts and to direct lies and scorn toward those of us who care about defending children.
    51. Re:It Could Be Worse by Etherael · · Score: 1
      Christianity is based upon the accepted historical fact that there was a guy called Jesus who lived in Israel about 2000 years ago. It's accepted by Jews, muslims etc that he was executed, but yet, a few days later his followers, who previously had been to scared to go outside, were standing in the temple proclaiming that Jesus had risen from the dead, and they were prepared to die for their belief.

      Not disputing it.

      Now I don't know about you, but I've met too many people walking around who've been dead for 36 hours or so after being flogged, crucifed and stabbed with a spear. Now we can't say that this is all completely proven in a scientific sense, but what we can say is that the evidence for Jesus rising from the dead is good enough to stand in most courts of law.

      That's a pretty big jump from the above, a pack of self proclaimed religious fanatics bearing witness to supernatural events that just happen to concur with their original but insubstantiated beliefs means just about nothing to me, if you don't have the resurrection, you don't have anything, and that's what I disagree with. There's no rational evidence for the resurrection beyond the eyewitness accounts of aforementioned religious fanatics two thousand years removed from the present day, that's a hell of a line of chinese whispers to go through in order to establish a fact.

      I'm not a lawyer, you may be right about the court of law thing, but there's no archeological or forensic evidence to support the resurrection, and the eye witness accounts are highly suspect to anyone who could honestly consider themselves rational.

      Jesus fulfilled over 200 prophecies from the old Jewish Bible, including many that predicted his death on the cross hundreds of years before it happened.

      Which you'd also have to denote some kind of objective significance to in order to make it mean anything at all, there's no reason to do so, ergo, it does not.

      This kind of thing doesn't just happen every day, and there are no really credible alternative explainations, so your left with acknowledging that Jesus was who he said he was, that is, the son of God.

      I can think of a credible explanation, just off the top of my head, he was a fraud and followed by a pack of religious fanatics, here's another one, he was a spiritually enlightened mortal followed by a pack of religious fanatics, here's another one, the story from back then is now so convoluted as to be meaningless.

      There are a great many alternate explanations that make a lot more sense according to occam's razor than that he was the son of the god of the jews and was risen from the dead by divine intervention.

      Of course, what you do with that knowledge is a different thing. You can ignore it and hope that God didn't really mean the things He said; that the God who created the universe 15 billion years ago was lying to us, or you can believe the words of the only man ever for whom there is no body. He said that we can become right with the God of the universe by simply accepting that Jesus was the scapegoat for all our sins, and by responding in love. No matter what you've done or who you are, Jesus paid the price of justice that God demanded and bought your life with his suffering.

      Why is this important? Because it means that righteousness is a gift and not something we cannot earn and boast about. Jesus reserved almost all of his critisism for the religious people of his day who wore their adherence to the rules as a badge, to the extent that the rules were more important than what they pointed to. They looked down on "sinners" like prostitutes and tax collectors, but those were the people Jesus spent time with. Today it might be drug dealers, pimps, prostitutes and other undesirables.

      This particular aspect of your religion I find downright offensive, nothing matters that you do on the planet, you could be a child molesting serial killer with a penchant for buggery, and as long as you ac

    52. Re:It Could Be Worse by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      Anyway, call me crazy if you like, but I say that trusting in Jesus makes life better.

      Except that there's ABSOLUTELY no proof that *ANY* of that happened except a book that may or may not be true, thats been proven to have sections redacted (reincarnation anyone?), and of course the bible fan club which couldn't know any more about the whole situation then anyone else. If this was *ANY* other topic you would demand proof, but somehow when someone brings up god a standard of proof ("no proof required") applies.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    53. Re:It Could Be Worse by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely correct about the resurrection: Christianity lives and dies by the truth of that event, and the only evidence that it occured are the 500 eyewitnesses that would have been known to many of the early Christians, and those who had been in fear for their lives, but were suddenly given unheard of conviction, strength and power.

      I can think of a credible explanation, just off the top of my head, he was a fraud and followed by a pack of religious fanatics Those were 10 a penny back then and none of those groups survive today. Killing the leader of a movement is usually a pretty good way to stop those things.

      he was a spiritually enlightened mortal followed by a pack of religious fanatics

      He never claimed to be such a man. He claimed to be the Jewish Messiah, the son of God, and He was either a nut or telling the truth. He said he would be killed and rise again, but his followers didn't understand. It wasn't what they expected the Messiah to be. They wanted him to be powerful and to free the Jews from Roman oppression, like all the other Messiah wannabes promised. Jesus was different and spent all his time royally pissing of the religious types by telling them that following God is not a box ticking exercise.

      the story from back then is now so convoluted as to be meaningless We have far more, and better copies of the early Christian writings that other contemporary histories like Tacitus and Josephus. These books were not mass produced but copied by hand by scribes who faced serious punishment for errors or even death for deliberate changes, and the many copies we have are all in agreement. Furthermore, the dead sea scrolls includes a full copy of Issiah which predates Jesus and is still identical to the copies that are made today, to the extent that someone able to read the Jewish torah today, is able to read the text in those ancient scrolls as well.

      This particular aspect of your religion I find downright offensive, nothing matters that you do on the planet, you could be a child molesting serial killer with a penchant for buggery, and as long as you accept Jesus Christ as your saviour, you'll be in the eternal grace of god.

      Alternately, you can refuse this and be cast into a fiery pit of damnation for all eternity, regardless of how virtuous you have behaved in your life. I don't see how christians can seriously consider this to be "the good news". If it really was true, and for all the reasons above, I find that on the highly unlikely side of unlikely, it'd be a cruel sick cosmic joke.


      You're not alone in finding this bit hard to swallow and somewhat outragous, but the bit you missed is that everyone deserves to go to hell, regardless of how good they appear to be. You, me, vicars, the Pope, presidents and drug dealers. No one can be made righteous by their own efforts and we all need Gods rescue plan, because all He really want is for us to love Him, and our sin simply stops us doing that.

      It's not a licence to do what you want and then turn to Jesus later, because God is not a petty traffic cop. He knows what is in your heart and mind and there's no way to trick him. The good news is that, as St Paul puts it, "While we were still sinners, Christ died for us".

      Faithfulness is truthfulness in other translations. Longsuffering is patience and meekness means putting other peoples interests before your own.

      Lastly, I didn't say faith was a virtue, but faithfulness is. Besides, you put faith in things every day. Right now your putting faith in the chair you're sitting on to hold your weight, and in the screen your looking at to reproduce accurately what I wrote. You're putting faith in thousands of scientists you never met for the operation of your computer etc. If you went around doubting everything you saw you'd not get very far.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    54. Re:It Could Be Worse by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      nonsense. There is no absolute proof of anything so we all put faith is stuff every day. Your chair for example. Before you sat on it you had faith that it would take your weight.

      hats been proven to have sections redacted (reincarnation anyone?) What are you talking about?

      Come back when you've spent time actually trying to prove that the Bible is false, or even substantially different from the very early writings when people reading them would have known some of the key characters in person and could have asked them whether these things were true.

      By the way, that's how science works. I state that something is true and you have to prove it is false. Belief in God may require faith but the consistancy of the Bible can be challenged, and has withstood better minds than yours for thousands of years. In the end it comes down to this. Are you so proud and arrogant that you can say for certain that there is nothing about the universe you cannot explain? That is as much a position of faith as mine, and somewhat less sturdy, unless you can create a new universe and prove me wrong.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    55. Re:It Could Be Worse by Etherael · · Score: 1
      Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof, there is no non religious historical account of the resurrection of christ at all, the beliefs and opinions of a pack of religious fanatics are irrelevant with regards to the facts. The truth is, though, there's very little that could do an adequate job of presenting the case for christianity today without some form of clear divine intervention for all to see.

      To ask people to believe that they're going to hell unless they accept the questionable actions of a questionable person two thousand years ago is so many steps beyond absurd as to be totally stark raving mad. Especially considering that there are *many* situations where it's simply not possible for the evidence for christianity, even if you really consider it to be worth the medium it's transmitted by, to be presented to the entire audience of those who are supposed to be burdened with the terrible task of accepting his salvation. The unborn, people in cultures where christianity has absolutely zero penetration, those subjects of cultures actively hostile to christian proselytizing, etc etc etc. It's morally offensive to imagine that all of those people are going to hell because they haven't heard the "good news"

      That being said, about the only thing that would convince me personally of the resurrection of christ would be something akin to dating of the blood on the spear of destiny, if such could be scientically proven to be his blood, followed by physical evidence of his later living existence, which I doubt is likely to surface any time soon. On that point, I believe we'll simply have to agree to disagree.

      You're not alone in finding this bit hard to swallow and somewhat outragous, but the bit you missed is that everyone deserves to go to hell, regardless of how good they appear to be. You, me, vicars, the Pope, presidents and drug dealers. No one can be made righteous by their own efforts and we all need Gods rescue plan, because all He really want is for us to love Him, and our sin simply stops us doing that.

      Are you trolling here, perhaps? It seems absurd to say this directly after pointing out how Jesus preached that following god was not a box ticking exercise. That's exactly what it is according to the definition you provide, scare some poor bastard with the thought of eternal damnation into accepting original sin and a saviour to boot. For someone who didn't take their beliefs particularily seriously, it could almost be a Monty Python sketch.

      Christian: Brother there is terrible news! Your forebears have sinned against our all loving god and the sin has been vengefully carried down throughout the generations of mankind unto you, and you are doomed to eternal suffering in a lake of fire!

      Human: Oh, Bugger! That's rather scary.

      Christian: Yes! It is, isn't it? BUT! I bring good news, our lord Jesus Christ, the son of god, died for your sins two thousand years ago and provided the sacrificial lamb for the aforementioned all loving god, all you need do is accept his sacrifice and you shall be elevated to the kingdom of heaven on your passing and spared the eternal torment of hell.

      Human: Oh well, that's very nice then, I'll take that.

      Christian: Brilliant, pleasure doing business with you, now, mind you, you really have to *believe* everything I just told you, you can't just pretend, but keep that up and we'll all be fine! Have a nice life and hopefully I'll see you on the other side!

      Human: Fantastic! Any other conditions?

      Christian: Hmmm? Oh, no, Just belief and acceptance of our lord's sacrifice will do fine, try being a nice chap if you can but it doesn't really matter, the faith part is what does the trick.

      Human: Great! Won't interfere with my plans for global domination at all then, I'm off to massacre some infidels.

      You're putting faith in thousands of scientists you never met for the operation of your computer etc. If you went around dou

    56. Re:It Could Be Worse by wtrmute · · Score: 1

      Of course you wouldn't mind. It isn't directed at you, after all, since you do think like them ;)

      Americans are actually very religious, but depending on which social group you look at, there are going to be a greater or smaller number of orthodox Christians, Wicca, atheists, or what-have-you. Most Christians are usually located on the suburbs, the home of Middle Class.

      As for something being absurdly foreign, not everyone thinks like you :) I used to have difficulty imagining a History teacher (or worse, a History professor) who isn't a Communist, but they are the overwhelming majority in the same USA. Hell, perhaps they're the majority in Australia, too -- sometimes, you all seem suspiciously alike. Maybe it has to do with being English colonies.

    57. Re:It Could Be Worse by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      OK, OK. Nice sketch, apart from the global domination line, and I know that GWB's plan, but I think he could do with reading a little wider.

      I'm gonna change tack here slightly because it's clear that trying to argue for Jesus with someone who isn't even all that keen on the concept of God is not easy ground.

      I'd like to explain my motives for this conversation, and it's not to beat you into submission or to allow me to say "told-you-so" or anything.

      When I look around at the world and see crime and pain and suffering, much of it inflicted in cruel and imaginative ways by people on other people, I can't help but feel deep in my soul how wrong that is. That somehow life was never meant to be like that, and if only everyone could recognise within themselves what life was supposed to be about then the world would be a much nicer place. Why do we have compassion for people we've never met, when a truly rational perspective would be that the more people get killed, the more space and resources there are for me and my relatives? The recent tsunami provoked an enourmous outpouring of generosity and compassion for our fellow men, but why should we care if we are just animals driven by a competative erge to spread our own genes?

      In a world without meaning, where do our common values and sense of right and wrong come from?

      Do you believe we have free will? If we are just biological machines as some biologists would claim, then is free will merely a figment of our imagination?

      I say no. When I look out at the universe and wonder about how it all began all those billions of years ago, and then think about how small and insignificant we are, I'm left to wonder how it is that we can choose how we live this short time we spend on this planet. For me I look out and I see the glory and power of an omnipotent God, and then I look close and I see how amazing it is that He created all the universe so that He could give us the freedom to choose to love Him, or to reject Him. How much must God love us and how important each and every one of must be to Him, for Him to go to such lengths to create beings that would love Him the way he loves us. Freely.

      THAT is why I expend effort trying to introduce you to your maker. He loves you for all your flaws and He would gain great pleasure from you returning that love. I act out of love for God and try to do what would please Him, because what pleases Him also pleases me. I also act out of love for you too, because even though I have no idea who you are, I'd love for you to feel the joy, wonder and awe that I feel today, but that I didn't feel just over a year ago before I decided to put aside my pride in my own intelectual abilities, and decided to find out where faith led.

      Now I know you're going to say I'm a nut, but if there were more nuts like me around the world would be a better place, and that in itself is kinda interesting, if the world makes any sense.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    58. Re:It Could Be Worse by Etherael · · Score: 1
      Cooperation is genetically beneficial, if you really want to take the tack that we are just a fleshy bipedal virus, you could still claim cooperation as a trait of fitness and sympathy and compassion as side effects of cooperation, things that make you a better cooperator.

      I'm agnostic, I know the scientific explanations for the universe and our being here, I know the theories on god or a higher power or intelligent design, I think there's perhaps even areas of intersection between what would be considered religious ideas and the science of genesis, what caused the big bang, was the entire evolution of the universe guided from that point toward a particular point by an extremely advanced "snooker shot" from a celestial being taking a hands off approach to population management? Who knows, not me, I can't conclusively say one way or the other, but certain theories, that being, most modern major religions are responsible for grossly distorting scientific fact to suit their own purposes, and thus, are specifically offensive to objective reason, that, my rational mind will not allow me to tolerate.

      To ask me to put aside reason is akin to asking me to start down the slippery slope to walking out into the middle of the road to play in traffic because I may find the experience enlightening, or sample arsenic because it has a fruity zest. I realise you probably believe I'm exaggerating to a large degree here, but as soon as you discard objective reason, you have very little else to stop you from doing as such beyond god's commandments, which we've already established aren't terribly important to christendom anyway, not so much a code as a guideline, to put it in pirate lingo. Also, if you discard reason, you've no way at all of establishing between the reasons you claim are crackpot or disingenuous, buddhism, hinduism, islam, and the one you've chosen as your path, christianity.

      I don't see how you can reconcile this in your own mind, it appears to me you see misery and search for a pleasant myth to cover it all up and make everything ok, and take the one that appears the easiest to follow and the most culturally convenient for you with regards to your geopolitical station, correct me if I'm wrong, by all means.

    59. Re:It Could Be Worse by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing against reason per say, and I am a software engineer by trade and a physicist by training so I know and understand about reason in scientific terms.

      If you look at Genesis it is important to realise that it is not really saying that the universe was literally created in six days. We can tell this because the structure of the book is that of an jewish form of poetry and certain things are mentioned symbolic numbers of times. What Genesis is saying is that God created the universe and that He created it so we could live in it. That makes it dramatically different to all the contemporary creation myths and so the start of Genesis can be understood as a story designed to debunk those other myths. Personally I am a evolutionary creationist (look it up in wikipedia), so I believe pretty much in your cosmic snooker shot, and so I see God reveals himself through the wonders of science and through spiritual means in parallel.

      All I am saying about reason is that it has it's limits and that some things are fundamentally unprovable, like the origin of the universe. That is where I think faith must begin. I found that when I reached that crunch point that I was scared to let go of the security of rational thought, but at the same time I was deeply frustrated that I couldn't prove the existance of God one way or the other, and I knew that my fear of losing face or of becoming one of those christian weirdo's was stopping me looking for the answer.

      the one that appears the easiest to follow and the most culturally convenient for you with regards to your geopolitical station

      I live in the UK, and I suspect it is much like Australia where agnosticsicm or even just willful ignorance is the culturally acceptable thing to do. Actually having an opinion on religion makes you some kind of nut, so it's not easy.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    60. Re:It Could Be Worse by Etherael · · Score: 1
      That is where I think faith must begin. I found that when I reached that crunch point that I was scared to let go of the security of rational thought, but at the same time I was deeply frustrated that I couldn't prove the existance of God one way or the other, and I knew that my fear of losing face or of becoming one of those christian weirdo's was stopping me looking for the answer.

      I don't understand why you took the leap of faith to begin with, a sense of hopelessness at the thought that what appears to be rational does not appear to be complete, thus you must fall back on the irrational to provide you with a complete understanding of the universe? Why would you really be deeply frustrated that the existence of god cannot be proven one way or the other?

      Invisible pink unicorn argument applies to this as well as all other faith based issues in the universe, it's all well and good until you start trying to pass it off as rational, verifiable, objective fact. In fact, explicitly, according to fideism, and to lesser degrees according to each seperate branch of christianity, if christianity was demonstrably true it would remove the entire point of grace through faith, since no faith is required for what one is personally aware of having followed the scientific method to categorical positive conclusion.

      That argument alone denies rationality, it's what makes the entire idea of rational debate on christianity impossible, because at some point in time there must be faith in order for there to be christianity.

      I live in the UK, and I suspect it is much like Australia where agnosticsicm or even just willful ignorance is the culturally acceptable thing to do. Actually having an opinion on religion makes you some kind of nut, so it's not easy.

      I think you can fairly clearly see I do have an opinion on religion, there's not much in relation to it that I haven't already considered, every facet you care to mention, of all major religions, and quite a few that aren't particularily major, I've gone over and examined carefully, continuously discarding that which was regarded as fact as offered by those who followed it. What I don't quite understand is how precisely you can admittedly surrender your reason and adopt faith on an issue such as this, is it out of a desire for completeness? A savage belief that there must be something more than what we currently see because otherwise it'd be too unbearable to contemplate, or am I still missing something?

    61. Re:It Could Be Worse by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia is great isn't it? I too found the fideism page and found it to be largely in line with my beliefs to the extent that I often describe myself as a fideist. It's like the babelfish disproving the existance of God by proving his existance. Proof denies faith.

      What I don't quite understand is how precisely you can admittedly surrender your reason and adopt faith on an issue such as this, is it out of a desire for completeness? A savage belief that there must be something more than what we currently see because otherwise it'd be too unbearable to contemplate

      Good question. I think that the reason I went looking for God lies in the sense of dissatisfaction with the possibility of this being it. If there is no God then we have no free will, there is no absolute morality, love is just a chemical inbalance and evil people will face no judgement. The universe is a cruel and unfeeling place governed by a random set of laws and chaos theory, where we are no more important than grains of interstellar dust. Finally, there is no life after death and our lives are meaningless, and so are everyone elses. When people die, it's not just them moving on, it's that their personality simply ceases to be and there is nothing left. If there is no God, then what is stopping us from fullfilling our darkest desires, and why should we consider the hopes and fears of anyone else. In my view, atheism can easily lead to sadism, or at least heavy hedonism. When I think of things like that I get a sense of what it must be like to be in the Total Perspective Vortex, and yes I do find that almost unbearable.

      The Invisible Pink Unicorn argument is quite compelling except for one thing. Faith in an IPU does not change millions of people lives for the better.

      When you look at the happiness or otherwise of those people who live like there is no God and for their own gain and pleasure, celebrities, certain high profile sports stars and the super rich, it is amazing to see how many have a wretched private lives. People like Howard Hughes and Maroline Monroe spring to mind, who live the life many of us dream of, yet are deeply unhappy in all their wealth. On the other hand look at the lives of people who live for God and by the words of the sermon on the mount.

      * Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. (Verse 3)
      * Blessed are the meek: for they shall posses the land. (Verse 4)
      * Blessed are they who mourn: for they shall be comforted. (Verse 5)
      * Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after justice: for they shall have their fill. (Verse 6)
      * Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy. (Verse 7)
      * Blessed are the clean of heart: for they shall see God. (Verse 8)
      * Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God. (Verse 9)
      * Blessed are they that suffer persecution for justice' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. (Verse 10)

      People like Mother Teresa and countless missionaries and care workers who sacrfice their own wellbeing for others live lives full of joy and satisfaction, despite not having all the things that people desire.

      If Jesus' words were not true and there was no God, then why would fullfilling all our earthly desires simply make us miserable, and not having them make us joyous? I think this testifies to the inhuman wisdom and truth of Jesus' words.

      Why did I choose to set aside reason in this question? Because I wanted the joy that these people have, and in less that 12 hours after I took my leap of faith I had it in bucket loads, and I still have it today, over a year on.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    62. Re:It Could Be Worse by Etherael · · Score: 1
      Good question. I think that the reason I went looking for God lies in the sense of dissatisfaction with the possibility of this being it. If there is no God then we have no free will, there is no absolute morality, love is just a chemical inbalance and evil people will face no judgement. The universe is a cruel and unfeeling place governed by a random set of laws and chaos theory, where we are no more important than grains of interstellar dust. Finally, there is no life after death and our lives are meaningless, and so are everyone elses. When people die, it's not just them moving on, it's that their personality simply ceases to be and there is nothing left. If there is no God, then what is stopping us from fullfilling our darkest desires, and why should we consider the hopes and fears of anyone else. In my view, atheism can easily lead to sadism, or at least heavy hedonism. When I think of things like that I get a sense of what it must be like to be in the Total Perspective Vortex, and yes I do find that almost unbearable.

      To say that there needs to be god in order for there to be free will, I do not understand, how can you then equate all the conditions of your supposed existence to reality as it stands if people don't have free will? I don't understand what god has to do with free will, at all.

      Your arguments for the justice of god are convincing only if you consider christianity and religon in general to be the only basis of morality, this is demonstrably false, there are many atheists that are not immoral, the very fact that the majority of the most popular arguments *against* christianity are based around the idea that it constructs a universe that we're all placed in as a cruel sick joke for a petty universal traffic cops self esteem boosting technique.

      Natural justice applies, independant of god's supposed law and rule, the evil reap what they sow in a large amount of cases bearing the wrath of those they seek to victimise, not because god wills it, but because humans have a self preservation and propagation instinct.

      The universe cannot simultaneously be cruel and unfeeling, it is of course unfeeling as it is not a corporeal identity, this is not such a terrible thing, the laws of the universe are not random, they are linked to one another in quite specific ways, gravity effects momentum, heat effects energy, light effects perception, etc etc etc. Why do you need to be bestowed with more importance than interstellar dust by a god you freely admit cannot be proven to *even exist* beyond faith. Is it not your task to achieve your own significance, be satisfied with your own existence, and share that significance with those you love and care for, is *that* not the path to happiness?

      Love need not be explained scientifically, or religiously, if it is just a chemical imbalance, and yet you choose to accept it, does that make it any less significant than if it were a gift from the IPU/god? I don't see why it should, in fact, I would argue that it makes it more significant, if it's hard reality rather than based on accepted myth that must be approached through blind faith or not at all.

      When people die, if they die, do you suppose any of this truly matters to them when they're actually dead? If they cease to exist in entirety, which is of course up for debate, they would have no opinion one way or another. If you accept that when people die, they are dead, and that is all, what better motivation could you possibly have than to make the very best you possibly could out of this life you currently live in? Rather than skulking around miserly accepting the terrible state which you've been browbeaten as accepting as an anathema by the admission of original sin and other associated church trappings in guilt, in hope of escaping the more heinous fate of hell by surrendering your rational thought to the blind faith of the ages, as much as attaining the supposed bliss of heaven by doing likewise.

      That which stops us from fulfilling our darkest desires, assuming that we

  5. Roll the dice... by Pugflop · · Score: 5, Funny

    My level 12 Galil with plumbum bullets strike down the level 4 suicide bomber. 100EXP and 12GP. :D

    1. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      12GP

      More likely you get zilch and are out your bullets.

    2. Re:Roll the dice... by fluffy666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Forgive my inexperience, but how does anyone get the Suicide Bomber class past level 1?

    3. Re:Roll the dice... by nurd68 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I got him first with my +1 to hit master crafted Barett M82A1...

    4. Re:Roll the dice... by rco3 · · Score: 0

      DAMN! and me with no mod points!

      Very nice, sir. Very nice.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    5. Re:Roll the dice... by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Funny

      By getting women and kids to carry their bombs for them.

    6. Re:Roll the dice... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      My level 12 Galil with plumbum bullets strike down the level 4 suicide bomber. 100EXP and 12GP. :D

      Yeah, but don't forget you have to roll 2d6 for damage from stone-throwing bystanders.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    7. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't forget retards!

      (yes, Hamas and al Qaeda are both guilty of this)

    8. Re:Roll the dice... by Apreche · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a prestige class. First you need a few levels of religious fanatic (paladin). Then you have to gain a few levels of suicide bomber before you actually gain the extroadinary ability of suicide bomb. And since it's D+D you can always get a raise dead or resurrection to do it again.

      Is anyone else bothered that all the pictures are of LARPers and not actual D+D? I think this shows the general misconception of what D+D is. If you are unsure of what D+D is really like I have a video for you.

      "attack the darkness"

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    9. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      preparing for the act.
      Strapping TNT to the stray cats, etc.

    10. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking character level. Suicide Bomber is a prestige class.

      Oh, god...kill me...

    11. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't. You see, the guild leader is a low-level cleric with a lot of ranks in Bluff, and can cast "Charm Person". "No, really, death is FUN"....

    12. Re:Roll the dice... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      True Ressurrection.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    13. Re:Roll the dice... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      True Resurrection
      Clr 9

      Yea, there can't be too many of them...

    14. Re:Roll the dice... by krypt0s · · Score: 1

      Kinda reminds me of the time the Legend of the Five Rings CCG printed an "experienced martyr" card. Not very good at your job, are you?

      --
      This is not the sig you're looking for.
    15. Re:Roll the dice... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Ba ba ba ba, bum ba bah bum baaaa!

    16. Re:Roll the dice... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      That probably applies to every single suicide bomber-- anyone who wants to blow up a pizza parlor or a night club filled with innocent civilians has some severe mental retardation.

      Same can be said for many people in the Israeli military as well.

    17. Re:Roll the dice... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      The best version I've seen of that bit is on the Summoner PS2 game...

    18. Re:Roll the dice... by evilmousse · · Score: 1


      equip them with +5 boxcutters and...

      (oh this could go so wrong..)

    19. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Another method is to carry the stick of dynamite in their ass to avoid detection--well, at least until guards learn to suspect people who walk funny.

    20. Re:Roll the dice... by briaman · · Score: 1
      Forgive my inexperience, but how does anyone get the Suicide Bomber class past level 1?
      I know. It's a miracle!
      --

      ==========
      Error in module creativity.dll : Unable to create witty comment.
      Abort / Retry / Ignore ?

    21. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That probably applies to every single suicide bomber-- anyone who wants to blow up a pizza parlor or a night club filled with innocent civilians has some severe mental retardation.

      Not really. That'd be psychological versus developmental.

    22. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civilians, yes. But please don't use the term "innocent".

    23. Re:Roll the dice... by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      Forgive my inexperience, but how does anyone get the Suicide Bomber class past level 1?

      Must be those crazy 3rd ed. rules. Back in my day the suicide bomber would start at level 0 and level 1 would be the highest they could ever attain.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    24. Re:Roll the dice... by ajakk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So when a four year old girl is killed by a suicide bomber, she was not innocent?

    25. Re:Roll the dice... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Why not? What did the people in the nightclub do?

    26. Re:Roll the dice... by DirtyAlex · · Score: 1

      FilePlanet sucks, but the queues for the file aint too long.

      http://www.fileplanet.com/86368/80000/fileinfo/Sum moner-Geeks-Movie-(.avi)

    27. Re:Roll the dice... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      This one is way better:

      http://www.fantasyfrontiers.com/product.php?prod uc tid=16489&cat=0&page=1
      I can't reccomend it enough.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    28. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course the US government and several states also execute the mentally challenged

    29. Re:Roll the dice... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      no mod points either, but I did nearly pee myself and give myself away (reading /.) to the rest of the office peons laughing at that comment! LOL

    30. Re:Roll the dice... by Saeger · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Call me cold, but putting everything else aside, it's better that a retard die than a productive member of society. *gasp!*

      I'm no cleansing nazi (godwin!), but if someone had a gun to my head and forced me to choose between the suicide bombing of 100 "average" people, or 200 mental retards, I'd choose the latter. *gasp!* Not until the ratio got up to around 20:1 would I rationally favor the murder of the normal group. *GASP!!!* (At this point my empathy for the familys of the larger retard group outweighs the rational reasons for the smaller group of productive people to continue living.)

      It's nice to pretend that everyone has an equal right to life-- even to the point of selfishly keeping your vegetable relatives alive -- but it's not that simple.

      (not posting anonymously)

      I'm sure somebody's just appalled by my line of thinking. :)

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    31. Re:Roll the dice... by MKalus · · Score: 1

      What's your definition of "Innocent"?

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    32. Re:Roll the dice... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I would pick the 100 average people unless the nation were in some kind of serious trouble in which we would need the maximum available population of the able-minded. I don't think someone with downs syndrome or whatever is less of a human than any of the rest of us. They are less of a thinker and while I do value intelligence I don't think that's what makes someone a good person.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they are not gay and married

    34. Re:Roll the dice... by Rangsk · · Score: 1

      I don't think you really thought this through. Who, exactly, makes the value judgement for who is more "worthy" of life than others? Since you've already Godwined this thread, I might as well mention the Nazis - remember that they had all kinds of propoganda that claimed scientists had proven that Jews and Blacks were inferior to the Arian race.

      I am, however, not comparing you to a Nazi. There were many other social pressures and reasons that the Holocaust happened, and many do not apply to what you're saying.

      You did say, however, that you would prefer that 1900 "retards" die rather than 100 "normal" people, if you could choose (I'm taking these numbers since you said that it wasn't until the ratio was 20:1 that you'd start to reconsider, which seems to be an odd ratio - would you prefer 1.9 billion "retards" over 100 million "normal" people?). What's your definition of a "retard" and what's your definition of a "normal" person? Do we use "scientific" analysis to figure this out? Intuition? Maybe if we just don't like the way the person acts? Would an "idiot savant" be considered retarded? How about someone who's depressed? A crippled person in a wheelchair, a blind person, deaf, dumb? Someone with a terminal disease? What about a 5 year old child who seems to be "retarded" but later in life it turns out to be a late bloomer? How long do we wait before deciding that someone is retarded? Do we pull the plug on someone who's in a coma? How long do they have to be in it before we decide to kill them? 1 year? 10 years? 50 years? I could go on and on about this, but I think I've shown my point.

      I mean, really, there's nothing rational at all about your argument if you think about it without such a closed-minded agenda of being anti-PC.

      --
      "Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose." --Douglas Adams
    35. Re:Roll the dice... by WoBIX · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Einstein considered mentally retarded during his early childhood?

    36. Re:Roll the dice... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      A four year old qualifies as innocent by any definition.

      If you don't believe that a four year old is innocent, you need to be locked away for life or worse.

    37. Re:Roll the dice... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      " Civilians, yes. But please don't use the term "innocent"."

      Why? Have they been proven guilty?

    38. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're choosing 200 retarded people over 100 average people over your one self.

    39. Re:Roll the dice... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Throws dice at someone.

      *whap*
      "Ow!"

      Now that, my friend, is called "Hit Dice".

    40. Re:Roll the dice... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      You make it sound as if there's actually some merit to suicide bombing - as if it's an honorable task that needs to be done, and that the only moral injustice here is that retards are being made to do it.

      What makes a productive member of society? Buying power? There used to be a time in America when a society was much more than a culture, when a productive member of society used to be called a "citizen". A citizen is someone that has a profound respect for the lives of the people around them. A citizen is someone who wants the best for others and will do their damnedest to help that person succeed in the event that the person is unable to help themselves. A citizen has an internal compass that helps them make decisions that are morally and ethically upright.

      Those retards are likely quite innocient, as many retards tend to be. They're uncorrupted by the lies of extremism, and quite certainly have the kindness and love of a 5 year old. Not one retard is worth the lives of 100 murderous miscreants who have no problem dying if it means the death of their children's wives and enemies in a coffee shop down the street.

      You are the problem with America, sir. It is your attitude which perpetuates the destruction of any semblance of social decency and citizen virtue.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    41. Re:Roll the dice... by SirKron · · Score: 1

      They made their saving throw. 1/20 will make 2nd level!

    42. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, used too; see Atkins v. Virginia.

    43. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully the guy holding the gun would pull the trigger anyway, making it 201 dead retards.

    44. Re:Roll the dice... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of these really huge dice we've seen from time to time at the local gamming shop chain.
      We've talking d6's pips the size of dime or nickles, d4's that could lame an elephant (think caltrop) and so on.
      We called the dammage dice, because if you got hit with them you were most definately damaged.
      Then about six months ago they got in 'nerf' style damage dice..... :)

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    45. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Wasn't Einstein considered mentally retarded during his early childhood?

      Yahh, frequently by Slashdotters in their permanent early childhood. Now, speaking of the mentally retarded...

    46. Re:Roll the dice... by WoBIX · · Score: 1

      Apparently you haven't read anything biographical on the man.

      We realize you're not retarded, just stupid.

    47. Re:Roll the dice... by MKalus · · Score: 1

      No,

      I do not believe that a four year old is innocent. We all are guilty of something. Just because a four year old might not be abel to apprehend this fact (or understand it) doesn't make it any different.

      After all, if you commit a crime, even though you don't know that what you do is breaking the law, you are still as guilty as if you had known it and done it.

      Now there are ways to give you "credit" for not knowing something, but that doesn't change the matter of the fact.

      But please, tell me why *I* should be locked away for life because of this believe?

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    48. Re:Roll the dice... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      But please, tell me why *I* should be locked away for life because of this believe?

      I do not believe that a four year old is innocent.

      Then you, Mr. Michael Kalus of Edmonton, Alberta; are out of step with the rest of civilization.
      You seem to think it's ok to kill a 4 year old, which makes you are a horrible person.

      Children cannot do anything to make them guilty enough to deserve death by any means-- by a Palestinian suicide bomber, Israeli bulldozer or the American military.

      A person who purposely kills innocent children is a murderer of the worst sort, and should be killed or locked away to protect the civilized people.

      However, since you used your real name to state this horrible opinion in a public forum, I hope your reputation is scarred for the rest of your life. The internet has a long memory, and the name "Michael Kalus" will forever be associated with your sympathy of suicide bombers and child killers.

    49. Re:Roll the dice... by MKalus · · Score: 1
      Then you, Mr. Michael Kalus of Edmonton, Alberta; are out of step with the rest of civilization.
      You seem to think it's ok to kill a 4 year old, which makes you are a horrible person.


      How did we get from "Not Innocent" to "It's okay to kill a four year old boy"?

      Children cannot do anything to make them guilty enough to deserve death by any means-- by a Palestinian suicide bomber, Israeli bulldozer or the American military.


      Ah? So when exactly does one stop being a child and become "worthy" of "deserving death by any means"?

      A person who purposely kills innocent children is a murderer of the worst sort, and should be killed or locked away to protect the civilized people.


      My objection was to your use of the word "innocent" that is what I am objecting with. But let me turn your argument around.

      According to you it is perfectly fine to kill and maime people that are "adult" (what is an adult still has to be defined in this discussion), only kids deserve all the protection they can get, once they are not a "4 year old" anymore (5? 6?) it is okay to have them killed.

      Children cannot do anything to make them guilty enough to deserve death by any means-- by a Palestinian suicide bomber, Israeli bulldozer or the American military.


      See, this is were we differ. I do not draw the line at ANY imagined "line" as you draw it up. I am way more to the point that NOBODY deserves an untimely death.

      A person who purposely kills innocent children is a murderer of the worst sort, and should be killed or locked away to protect the civilized people.


      What now? Locked away or killed? Make up your mind, just a couple of paragraphs up you were stipulating that only kids don't deserve death, everybody else is fair game.

      However, since you used your real name to state this horrible opinion in a public forum, I hope your reputation is scarred for the rest of your life. The internet has a long memory, and the name "Michael Kalus" will forever be associated with your sympathy of suicide bombers and child killers.


      Meanwhile you are hiding behind an pseudonym, afraid of being hold to your own words. That's really mature of you.

      BTW, while you're at it, why don't you go ahead and post my home address and phone number(s)? You obviously seem to want to take that personally, I can't wait for all your loony friends to show up at my door.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    50. Re:Roll the dice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The topic:

      So when a four year old girl is killed by a suicide bomber, she was not innocent?

      Your response:

      What's your definition of "Innocent".

      Honestly, someone I cared about was killed by a suicide bomber, and you came up with that response, I'd beat the living shit out of you. I'm sure the cops would cheer me on.

    51. Re:Roll the dice... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      What do you think this is? A moral discussion of WHEN someone becomes non-innocent, and can therefore become a legitimate target for suicide bombers? It is ALWAYS wrong to kill innocent civilians-- it is ESPECIALLY wrong to target those innocents, regardless of age.

      And to be honest, I have no indention of posting your address. My only goal was to make a Google search of "Michael Kalus" attached to your response here. I'm sure most people will be as offended as I am.

    52. Re:Roll the dice... by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Only if they lack as much of a brain as you do.

      I do not believe that anybody is innocent, not me, not you. If you truly believe this I suggest you go back praying and stop shooting your mouth of in the Forum.

      Innocent or not, has nothing to do with the fact if a person deserves to die or not. It seems to be you who thinks he can decide when someone has "lost" his or her innocence and is "free to be blown up." My how might you have to feel.

      And as for your Google attempt, go on, do your worst, if someone reads the entire discussion all they can do is laugh at you how feebel and childish you are, no wonder nobody wants to play with you.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    53. Re:Roll the dice... by MKalus · · Score: 1
      Honestly, someone I cared about was killed by a suicide bomber, and you came up with that response, I'd beat the living shit out of you. I'm sure the cops would cheer me on.


      Good for you.

      Now let's first correct your grammar, it has to be:

      "Honestly, if someone I cared about was killed by a suicide bomber, and you came up with that response, I'd beat the living shit out of you. I'm sure the cops would cheer me on."

      Now on to your hatemongering: If someone you know would have died in a suicide attack you most likely would not want to debate the meaning of innocence.

      But this is a hypothetical discussion not one of personal grieve.

      The keyword here is PERSONAL grieve. A death is ALWAYS a personal tragedy, rarely (if ever) one of global / far reaching / earth shattering consequences.

      The concept of "innocence" is the same thing. It implies something that is "pure" "precious" and needs to be protected by all means.

      Problem with this is: From an evolutionary standpoint it doesn't matter, life has no meaning in and on itself, sure, offspring is precious for the parents as it guarantees our genetic survivial, but in our most primal characteristics it is better if the "other one" dies off, hence more food and chances of survival for our own offspring.

      What you two noobs need to learn is to differentiate between your personal emotions when it comes to your own family (and friends) and to a scenario.

      And hey, if you want to punch me: Come on, I am sure you're smart and can find my address, come on and try your best.

      Until then: Think first, then type.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  6. That's nothing - by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    Wait 'til you hear what they do to recruits who admit they read Slashdot!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:That's nothing - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the high rate of Anti-semitism here, I would hope it is quite harsh.

  7. There's a good reason by CSMastermind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Think about it. D&D attracts imaginitive players who are able to think for themselves. Now does that seem like people you want in your Army? I ship out to Marine boot camp Aug. 1st and people have told me over and over again that when I get there...I shouldn't stand out. D&D players are different...and normally very smart. In an army you want drones who can think for themselves but will never question orders. Why do you think the great dictators killed teachers???

    1. Re:There's a good reason by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      Why are you joining the Marines? If you think you're 'different' and 'very smart', then you're probably going to have a very difficult 4+ years....

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    2. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Think about it. D&D attracts imaginitive players
      >who are able to think for themselves.

      D&D attracts people who need umpteen rule books to define their lives.

    3. Re:There's a good reason by deft · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Think about it. D&D attracts imaginitive players who are able to think for themselves. Now does that seem like people you want in your Army?"

      If you are going to make broad generalizations about D&D players, I'll go ahead and say are you sure you want a bunch of pasty white never been outside dice rollers carrying around guns in a battlefield not taking orders because they are "thinking for themselves?".

      Nope, but dont worry, this former D&D player was all state, all conference, MVP, etc in HS and college waterpolo. Not all D&D players are your typical generalization. Nor are all of them imaginative.

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    4. Re:There's a good reason by LordEd · · Score: 1

      Why do you think the great dictators killed teachers???

      Because they played too many video games?

      ---------------
      Heads +1 funny, tails -1 OT

    5. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't say he was a D&D player, he didn't say he was "very smart" and he didn't say he was "different". Try reading it again.

    6. Re:There's a good reason by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      He could always go Recon.

      Time to hit the weight room and the pool...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is pitifully obvious you are a D and D player.

      Funny, almost every D and D player I know is a lackey, a follower. To equate following orders with not thinking for themselves shows your immaturity. Good luck in the Army dude, you'll need it.

    8. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not all D&D players are your typical generalization.

      that's why it's called a generalization and not an absolute, numb nuts.

    9. Re:There's a good reason by Himring · · Score: 1



      Erm, hated homework?...

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    10. Re:There's a good reason by Stalyn · · Score: 1

      cause he's tired of rolling dice to do some killing... he's a real warrior.

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    11. Re:There's a good reason by northcat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh please. You're giving too much credit to gamers. The Israeli army frowns upon them because the players are *impressionable*. Almost the opposite of what you said. The players easily adapt to the fantasy world of D&D, so their beliefs can be changed easily than others.

    12. Re:There's a good reason by CSMastermind · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oringinally Posted by: Reducer2001
      Why are you joining the Marines? If you think you're 'different' and 'very smart', then you're probably going to have a very difficult 4+ years....

      I'm not all that different and I'm not even going to say I'm smart. As for why I'm going into the Marines? There's alot of reasons.

      One, I think it will be good for me. I'm a high school senior, varsity soccer player, and all and all what you would call a computer nerd. I'm not that strong physically, nor do I pretend to know my way around firearms. When I'm in the Marines I have a feeling that will change.

      Two, they're paying for my college. I'm a reservist for 4 years and then active duty for the next for. While in the reserves the Marines will pay for me to go to college (I've been accepted into Carnegie Mellon and Case Western but I haven't chosen yet).

      Thrid? Because for 18 years of my life I really haven't done anything to protect the freedom that I'm lucky enough to have. Throughout history fellow Americans have sacrificed and even given their lives to protect this country. I felt it was my time to do something.

    13. Re:There's a good reason by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Think about it. D&D attracts imaginitive players who are able to think for themselves. Now does that seem like people you want in your Army?

      That's exactly the sort of people you want in your army. Clueless nimrods who can't function if the expected parameters are altered are exactly what they should be trying to avoid.

      I ship out to Marine boot camp Aug. 1st and people have told me over and over again that when I get there...I shouldn't stand out. D&D players are different...and normally very smart.

      You assume that being smart will make you stand out in the military. Well, sorry to burst your bubble but the military has a LOT of smart people, and chances are your intelligence won't stand out as much as you think. Anyone who says "don't let on that you're smart" is really saying "don't spout off trying to be a know-it-all". Keeping your mouth shut and your eyes open (particularly when in boot camp) is the wisest course. Once you've been in a while you'll figure out when it's appropriate to offer your "smarts". Nobody (particularly drill sergeants) likes a wise-ass.

      In an army you want drones who can think for themselves but will never question orders.

      You got a lot to learn about the nature of the US military. Your description fits the old Soviet military, but not ours. In an army you want people who can understand an objective and modify an operational plan of the fly as the situation changes. Soldiers who stop and look at their commanding officer every time they run into an unexpected obstacle are worthless. I suspect you'll get quite an eye-opening education on this come 2005AUG01, courtesy of the US Marine Corps.

      Why do you think the great dictators killed teachers???

      Which "great dictators"? Name a dictator that had an effective army full of mindless, uneducated "drones". Name an effective army that wasn't backed by a solid educational system. Killing teachers is a move to solidify a political position, not to create an ignorant pool of cannon fodder.

      As for the IDF automatically lowering RPG-ers security clearances, I think they're idiots. I spent 4 years in the US Army as a SIGINT analyst, and I'd say that fully half the people I worked with played role playing games. I wonder, do they think that D&D is "bad" and that hex-map war games are good? At what point does pretending you're Rommel the general become OK, vs. playing Skorzeny the commando? Is it the level of abstraction? Is it the medieval fantasy aspect of D&D? Perhaps it has to do with the fact that most people entering the IDF are there for compulsory service. I knew a lot of D&D dorks in high school who would never be a good fit for military service. The thing is, those of us dorks who were a good fit would have been stuck as truck drivers or something under an IDF-style rule. I think the IDF is tossing out the baby with the bathwater here, but hey, it's their stupid army.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:There's a good reason by halofan_sd · · Score: 0

      Just what is "imaginitive" about playing a game following rules in a rulebook?

    15. Re:There's a good reason by dspacemonkey · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.

      Armies tend not to want people prone to drifting off into fantasy-land.

      Today I am invincible Steve, master of ninja
      and
      Today I am James Bond, master spy
      tend to make you dead and susceptible to a sting by a foreign power respectively. I would have thought that that counts for a lot more than any desire for drones.

    16. Re:There's a good reason by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1
      In an army you want drones who can think for themselves but will never question orders. Why do you think the great dictators killed teachers???
      I think you are misunderstanding what the IDF is saying. In fact, it appears that most of the posters have done the same. A postion for dumb grunts is exactly where the IDF wants these people. TFA says they'll have lower security clearance, likely meaning they'll have jobs where the potentional for exposure to sensitive intelligence is nil. Being cannon fodder doesn't require a high security clearance.

      I think their psychological research is refuse. They're intentionally leaving out a segment of the population that likely has higher-than-average intelligence and a willingness to learn new skills. These are exactly the type of people that should occupy posts that require complex skills.
      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    17. Re:There's a good reason by dynamo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because you pick up a weapon and follow orders doesn't necessarily mean you are defending freedom. In fact you sign away a huge portion of your existing freedom when you agreed to try.

      Remember that you are still responsible for actions you take that are illegal or immoral, even when you are ordered to do so. There seems to be a lot of that going around lately.

    18. Re:There's a good reason by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      All I can say is good luck and godspeed.

      I was going to enlist at one time, but couldn't due to my (prescribed) use of antidepressants for a short time (around the same time I was talking to a recruiter).

    19. Re:There's a good reason by Achra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a former Marine, I can't resist. :) I joined out of highschool for similar reasons. I notice that they're still pushing that giant falsehood: Pay for college. :) Unless things have dramatically changed, the GI bill for reservists amounts to about an extra $100-200 per month in addition to the (aprox) $200 you receive for your drill weekend. I know I couldn't have done college on $300-400 a month. The Real GI bill that "pays for college" (at least used to be, I understand things may change during wartime).. You would pay in a certain amount of every check for 4 years of active duty, and then it would "mature" into $30,000 of college tuition. Aside from the fact that this is wartime, so you won't be spending any time in the "reserves" anyways. But these parts aside, and on to the reason I wrote this reply! While you are in bootcamp, don't take anything personally. All the goofy stuff is for a reason, the way they make you carry a glass of juice in the messhall (Live grenade, coming through!), etc, etc, etc.. It all pops up later in training and makes sense. (Turns out that when you throw a grenade it's one hand over the top, just like with the glass). Even IT (Incentive Training) isn't a punishment so much as a method to get a bunch of squishy recruits turned into marines in as short a period as possible. Enjoy bootcamp, you'll get 8 hours sleep every night (except the crucible, which is no big deal).. As Marines will tell you, that's the most sleep they received during their entire enlistment. :) Good luck, try not to stick out (But nobody tries to stick out.. :) and don't take any part of it personally.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    20. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Too bad they succeeded in misleading you that way. Now you'll have to sacrifice your life for Texaco and Haliburton. Hopefully the board of directors and the shareholders will appreciate it.

      As to them paying for your school, I've always said - "it's much better to have a big student loan but to stay alive rather than become a piece of smoked ham fighting for the wrong cause"

    21. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HS and college waterpolo.

      How do you keep the horse from drowning?

    22. Re:There's a good reason by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      The players easily adapt to the fantasy world of D&D, so their beliefs can be changed easily than others.

      Assuming that this were true, then it would be a plus for the army trainers. It would make it easier to condition normal people to kill others and obey orders contrary to their own interests. That's what half of military training is about.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    23. Re:There's a good reason by swimmar132 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hah. Water polo's not wimpy. It's gay as hell, with your underwater grabbing and "hole sets" and wings and balls and speedos.

    24. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being smart has nothing to do with being noticed, having common sense does - and being smart doesn't neccesarily mean you have that either. I was probably smarter than most of the people in my platoon - 6 weeks into training one of the drill sergaents says to me "Are you in my platoon?". Once you get your head shaved and wear the same clothes they can hardly tell you apart anyway, so if you do what you are told you're fine. But inevitably you will always have a couple fuckwits who do something stupid and their names stick on the tips of the wrong toungs.

      But in all honesty that's natural selection at work. It's pretty easy to give advice, and I'm sure everyone there has heard it, it's only the idiots who ignore it that make things harder on themselves. Well I'm sure he'll figure that out eventually in the military - it's an invaluable experience for learning about people save nothing else.

    25. Re:There's a good reason by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on joining, and good luck with it. Don't let the anti-military folks get you down.

    26. Re:There's a good reason by northcat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, military training is not about making people impressionable. Part of it is making people *unimpressionable*. What you are saying is that the soldiers being impressionable eases the job of the trainers. But it's ok, the trainers do a pretty good job of making even the most stubborn person a good soldier anyway. Being impressionable is a HUGE trade off (did I use the phrase correctly?).

      It seems that you might not have understood the bad effects of a soldier being impressionable, so I'll try to explain. First of all, he can cheat his country. Not stealing the plans to a secret underground volcanic weapon, but something smaller. Then his opinions might get modified easily, and he might lose some of his support for the cause his country is fighting for. His mind might become fluctuated (damn, I really don't know English) by what he sees in the battlefield. And an impressionable mind often implies a weak mind, which sucks for a soldier. (Plus, the other guy who replied to me does a pretty good job of explaining too.)

    27. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You know, his post is well-written and articulated. Do you really think he needs to be lectured by a jackass like yourself?

    28. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Think about it. D&D attracts imaginitive players who are able to think for themselves.

      Aren't we taking this a bit far? I've played D&D in my time, but I wouldn't brag about it as if it's some sort of big deal. I knew some very good D&D player that I wouldn't hire to walk my dog.

    29. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well written, but not very convincing.

    30. Re:There's a good reason by EinarH · · Score: 1
      Well, I think you are right, but also that you are a bit outdated and the IDF reaction is wrong.

      Before, the standard thinking about soldiers/privates was that it didn't mattered if they were stupid or had "lower intelligence than the average" because all an Army wanted them to to was to follow orders from above anyway (simplified explanation but yo get the point).

      Today, the large scale tank battle with fixed position against a defined enemy is not that likely. In stead more smaller conflicts against smaller but more sophisticated enemies is expected. For Isralel, think; Egypt, Iran, Syria etc. but also al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hizbolla. So most armies are moving towards more indepentant soldiers that are able to make better choices in difficult environments. Back in the cold war days you should shoot the enemy and that's it.
      Now you might have to cooperate with other groups/units/countries/enemies, decide if the plan from above is possible, decide if it's worth it(friendly fire/collateral damage), come up with unconventional solutions etc etc. The whole battle field is different.

      So my guess is that filtering out D&D players is not that smart in the long term, since some of those folks might be better decision makers than the average, they might be higher educated and can also be better at understanding complex scenarios.

      So why is IDF doing this. Some possible explanations:

      1. The IDF psychologists are not updated on who they should de-select. Either because they are a bit conservative on who they should sort out or because the IDF fucked up the whole thing.
      2. IDF really don't want independant thinkers because they mess up with the "normal" chain of command and "the traditional way of doings things here". Change is bad. D&D'ers are liberal-communist-hippies. TM.
      3. D&D'ers* are more prone to disobeying orders that they belive are unethical. Such as occupying Palestinian land and other stuff that Israel do. If this is the reason it speaks voloumes about IDF and Israel.
      4. I'm a clueless guy. D&D'ers are evil and will hurt Israel.

      *BTW I really hate D&D. It's lame.

      BTW 2. The advice about standing out is also misleading. You should stand out. But in a postitive, not negative way.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    31. Re:There's a good reason by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      D&D players are different...and normally very smart.

      I would be very suprised if this were true.

    32. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree with you on this one. I don't know of any D&D players personally that LARP (which seems to be the big disturbing factor here for the army... I think) but personally I just play as an outlet for my creativity. However, you always get those amusing moments in gameplay when someone does something suiting to their character's stats but they didn't intentionally do AS their character (friend decided to say he went to look around inside a burning building instead of just look inside the building through the open door. Much burning ensued).

    33. Re:There's a good reason by carn1fex · · Score: 1

      ah oh Oh! YES! OH!- ahh shit. Just when i thought someone on slashdot arrived with a real resume of pure testosterone to give us all some credibility.. water polo??! One of my friends in college was on the varsity water polo team.. he was a fat guy named rob and he had one eye and he was about as athletic as a walrus.

      --

      ---------

      No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

    34. Re:There's a good reason by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Way to compliment yourself. When I hear someone is a D&D player the first thing I think are the phrases "severe family and emotional problems" and "divorced from reality."

      Every person Ive known who was seriously into D&D has had just that, severe emotional problems. In college I was dating this gorgeous chick who was big into D&D, MUDs, LOTR, etc. It was a novelty for about a month... then it became appartent she was a complete basketcase using MUDs to only spend a few hours a day in this reality. Id ask her how her day went and shed blather on about the dragons in her games or something... She met another D&D addict and started dating him at the same time I was pressuring her to back off the MUDs and concentrate on things like paying the rent... you know what they say about getting inbetween people and their addictions.

      Second story, I was hiring my replacement at my last sysadmin job ts a university research lab. The decision came down to a qualified guy, and a less qualified guy. The less qualified guy got the job due to some nepo/favoritism. First thing he does after I make his accounts is install MUD clients and ask "do you play DND?" I knew he was toast right there. After a months training, last thing I do on the last minute of my last day is run a L0 backup (the user accounts are worth hundreds of thousands if not millions). First thing the guy does the next morning, erase all the user accounts. Suprisingly they overlooked the ordeal, but after two months he was gone just the same.

      I have had several other friends as well who had pretty bad problems, who played D&D. I think D&D attracts emotional problems like GTA attracts those violence nuts.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    35. Re:There's a good reason by TrentC · · Score: 1

      Not all D&D players are your typical generalization. Nor are all of them imaginative.

      Just ask every drow who's an outcast from his/her people, and not really evil, dual scimitars and all.

    36. Re:There's a good reason by sconeu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dun Malg is correct. I'm having this same debate over on another board, with someone who is convinced that the US Military is all about robotically following orders.

      Current US doctrine calls for highly trained professional warriors. You don't get that with "Obey any and all dumb orders and don't think". They *WANT* people who show initiative. I've been a defense contractor for 20 years, and without exception, the people I've dealt with -- from E-1s up to 2-stars -- have been intelligent, capable people.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    37. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a lot to learn about life. Good luck.

    38. Re:There's a good reason by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      When I hear someone is a D&D player the first thing I think are the phrases "severe family and emotional problems" and "divorced from reality."

      When I hear someone say "When I hear someone is a D&D player the first thing I think are the phrases 'severe family and emotional problems' and 'divorced from reality'," the first thing I think are the phrases "severe recto-cranial inversion" and "learned theology from Chick tracts".

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    39. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "After a months training, last thing I do on the last minute of my last day is run a L0 backup (the user accounts are worth hundreds of thousands if not millions)."

      Must not be a lot of data if you can back it up in a minute, though. What is it? Cayman Island bank account numbers?

    40. Re:There's a good reason by DavidBlewett · · Score: 1

      Under the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) in the US military, you are not required to obey an order that is either illegal or immoral. Doing so is your choice and you alone are responsible for it.

    41. Re:There's a good reason by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      Must not be a lot of data if you can back it up in a minute, though. What is it? Cayman Island bank account numbers?

      Actually, the backups at the time took about 9 hours... What I meant, and what I suspect you already know I meant, was, that I started the backups before I left, and they proceded to run until the early morning.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    42. Re:There's a good reason by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      Thats very nice and all but this article is about giving the role players "lower security" clearance. They can still be conditioned to kill others as you say. They just won't know the classified intelligence behind it.

      Easily impressionable goes both ways, enemy spy's can use them for intel.

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
    43. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name a dictator that had an effective army full of mindless, uneducated "drones". Name an effective army that wasn't backed by a solid educational system.

      Ghengis Khan.

      He was an illiterate nomad who lead a large band of illiterate nomads to conquer essentially all of Asia within a single lifetime. He eventually conquered educated people as well, but his army certainly wasn't "backed by a solid educational system". He conquered more land than just about anyone else in history.

      He was a dictator: his credo was "join, or die!". If he didn't trust you, you didn't get the first choice.
      --
      AC

    44. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm assuming you want answers, so...

      Being impressionable is a HUGE trade off (did I use the phrase correctly?).

      I don't think so. I think you wanted "turn off", which would mean that they would not like that trait.

      "Trade off" is when you accept something bad in order to improve the overall situation.

      Suppose you have four people deciding on the color of a flag. Half want red, the other half want blue. As a trade off, they choose to have half the flag red and half blue.

      It's accepting something you don't want in order to get a partially acceptable result as opposed to an unacceptable result.

      His mind might become fluctuated (damn, I really don't know English) by what he sees in the battlefield.

      Fluctuated does mean to change, but it really means to cycle. So someone who was fluctuating would be cycling between various ideas.

      I think the word you're looking for is "fragile" but I'm not sure, implying that his state of mind becomes even weaker and more prone to accepting what an outside influence suggests.

    45. Re:There's a good reason by Arroc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Your description fits the old Soviet military, but not ours.
      wow, I'm impressed. did you think of that all by yourself?
      In an army you want people who can understand an objective and modify an operational plan of the fly as the situation changes. Soldiers who stop and look at their commanding officer every time they run into an unexpected obstacle are worthless. ...and you keep proving exaclty his point.
      Name an effective army that wasn't backed by a solid educational system.
      The US Army is pretty effective, I wouldn't call the educational system solid.

    46. Re:There's a good reason by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      But it's ok, the trainers do a pretty good job of making even the most stubborn person a good soldier anyway.

      Hmmm. I think you are right in this. If someone were unimpressionable then this would be less of a disadvantage for the army trainers, who have time, resources and unrestricted control over the recruits, than it normally would be for an enemy faction that were limited to the odd pamphlet or pretty girl in a bar.

      Still, the point I was making was primarily that the military's problem is not a recruit being impressionable, they want this. The problem is, as you point out, the recruit remaining impressionable after he's already been pressed into the shape the army wants him.

      Just to bring this back to the news article itself though, I don't think a D&D'er would be any more "impressionable" than average. It depends what you mean by impressionable.

      If you're saying it means easily convinced of another's argument, then I would disagree as the role-player is used to playing and discarding different world-views / character types. This would at first make you think they would be quick to take on a different set of beliefs, but in fact they are more used to (a) detaching themselves from these roles-beliefs and (b) comparing these roles and choosing which is most suitable. That objectivity hinders others from trapping you in their own world-view.

      Of course, this ability would be called too "impressionable" by an army where they wanted a recruit to adhere to a role best for them and not for the recruit. I think the biggest risk to the army for soldiers being impressionable today, is not an enemy nation, but currently peace campaigners and economists. I mean - how is a thinking soldier supposed to maintain the belief that he is fighting for freedom when he reads about Haliburton oil contracts and the rest of it? If all soldiers were "impressionable" then we might get into a few fewer wars.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    47. Re:There's a good reason by drxenos · · Score: 1

      Anecdotal evidence is proof of nothing. There have been millions of people over the years who have played D&D or other RPGs. You cite two examples. This is not even a statistical blip. I have known a lot of people how have played these games in my 3+ decades, and all but a couple are well adjusted (whatever that means) people with good jobs and families.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    48. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "D&D players are different...and normally very smart."

      I don't buy this. I've played AD&D, and all AD&D players have going for 'em is imagination. To be sure, there are some bright people playing D&D, but there are some idiots as well. I think nerdy roleplayers tell themselves that roleplayers are smart to make themselves feel better. Any damn dipshit can sit around staring out windows and daydreaming about swords as much as yer average genius.

      Consider some play I had as DM:
      DM: You chase the child into the forest. You have been following his trail for some time when - oh no! - you are attacked by tree goblins!
      Players: Tree goblins?!
      DM: They scamper about the branches above your heads, throwing nuts and branches at you. But you can see the metal gleam of the knives they carry. Their beady eyes and sharp teeth glisten. They are massing for a serious attack!
      Player 1: I get out my sword!
      Player 2: I ready my bow!
      Player 3: *looking in his spell book*
      Player 4: I CLIMB A TREE!
      DM: You ... What?
      Player 4: I climb a tree!
      DM: You know these are tree goblins, right? They live in the trees normally.
      Player 4: I'll get a better view of the battle from high up. And the goblins won't be able to approach me without me seeing.
      DM: (takes deep breath) Ok.. Make a dex check...

      Well, player 4 was beaten within a few points of her life by the nimble tree goblins, at which point she fell out of the tree. According to the falling rules she took enough damage to render heself dead (not just unconcious).

      Smart? Not so much.

    49. Re:There's a good reason by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, even if you learn about some of this stuff from popular mechanics (which means you don't really know shit) you know about all kinds of crazy high-tech crap the U.S. military is preparing to hang on soldiers. This OICW project (I forget what the weapon's final designation ended up being) is off the hook, there's the walker systems to allow people to carry gigantic backpacks (useful when everyone is carrying around a fully automatic carbine with a high ROF and a 20mm semiautomatic cannon on the bottom of it)... The individual U.S. soldier is going to be more dangerous than anyone else's, at least for a while.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    50. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the ARTICLE DAMNITT! and whoever modded you up to five obviously didn't. The article explicitly states that they are still allowed into the military, but are not given high security clearance. This is because they have been found to be disconnected from reality, and susceptible to influence. Which is practically the opposite of what you're saying. By your statements, they certainly WOULD want D&D players in high security positions, because they can be intelligent and original.

    51. Re:There's a good reason by SlowEmotionReplay · · Score: 1

      "Nor are all of them imaginative"!
      Oooh, I disagree!
      You make me so angry, I...I...uh...
      Attack with my sword! }: (

    52. Re:There's a good reason by lgw · · Score: 1

      Good luck in the Marines and ... thanks! It can't be said enough: thank you to everyone who volunteers to serve, but especially to the Marines who in recent conflicts have been the most in harm's way. I hope you enjoy improvising, adapting, and overcoming!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    53. Re:There's a good reason by lgw · · Score: 1

      It's funny, but somehow that's not surprising to me - it sort of fits my image of him. An actor? Into role-playing games? Go figure. :)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    54. Re:There's a good reason by lgw · · Score: 1

      Just what is "imaginitive" about playing a game following rules in a rulebook?

      If the gameplay is any good at all, you'll encounter situations not covered by the rulebook constantly.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    55. Re:There's a good reason by ManeeshBrash · · Score: 1

      "I'm not that strong physically," Go to the gym There are also a lot of safer ways to pay your way through college. As for protecting freedoms. Wars at the moment are being fought to distract people from the fact that peoples freedoms are being taken away.

    56. Re:There's a good reason by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Thats the thing. I didnt say *EVERY* D&D player has emotional problems. I said I think that D&D attracts people with these problems in larger quantities then other hobbies. And I stand by that claim.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    57. Re:There's a good reason by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Nor are all of them imaginative.

      Right up until the point where they get a chance to min/max their character, at which points they make the expression 'creative accounting' look truely inadequate...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    58. Re:There's a good reason by smurf975 · · Score: 1

      Why do you think the great dictators killed teachers???

      Which "great dictators"? Name a dictator that had an effective army full of mindless, uneducated "drones". Name an effective army that wasn't backed by a solid educational system. Killing teachers is a move to solidify a political position, not to create an ignorant pool of cannon fodder.

      With effective army do you mean local or global? As I have a very long list of local powers and their uneducated masses (soldiers)..

      However global (or even intern nations) powers until now have some kind of educated people. Relativly speaking.
      --
      -- I don't buy it, I grow it.
    59. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummmm, walruses are astoundingly athletic... especially in the water...

    60. Re:There's a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when you play baseball you just make up the rules as you go?

      Tackle baseball?

      Yeah, you'd be fun to play games with.

      All games are in a framework with a scoring system. Otherwise they would be no fun to play.

    61. Re:There's a good reason by humina · · Score: 1
      The military wants people to adapt to the orders given. They do not however want them to analyze the motives for the war in the first place. That would lead to insubordination. They want an officer to say "these orders tell us to go through this huge enemy camp in order to make this supply delivery. I'm gonna disobey orders and go around the camp so that we are all alive to make the delivery". They do not want the officer to say "How does carpet bombing this mostly civilian region help those civilians again?"

      Which "great dictators"? Name a dictator that had an effective army full of mindless, uneducated "drones". Name an effective army that wasn't backed by a solid educational system. Killing teachers is a move to solidify a political position, not to create an ignorant pool of cannon fodder.

      Well the obvious response of hittler come to mind. He was not great in his vision for the world, but the Nazi's sure were great at controlling public opinion through intense propaganda machines. The people's intense political position helped hittler go on a huge killing spree. His army worked pretty well because the people in the army did not question the motives for going to war. The Nazi army was very effective at killing because they did not question their orders' motives. I'm sure they were educated enough to make smart tactical decisions.

      Teaching an army about moral behavior does not help the military kill people. Militarys have varying goals, but the means are always the same: killing people. Whether the military is there to secure the peace, liberate or save it's people, push back invaders... the means of the military remain the same. Force (killing).

      In regard to the military looking down on D&D players, I don't really care. Maybe D&D players make bad killers.

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    62. Re:There's a good reason by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I think that's just about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Impressionable? All kids are impressionable. Do you think armies should frown upon people who spend more then eight seconds combing their hair, or those who spend hours looking for the "right pair of genes". Do you also think the same of those who read fiction? Explain why that's any different.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    63. Re:There's a good reason by runderwo · · Score: 1
      I spent 4 years in the US Army as a SIGINT analyst
      Lucky. My entire time here I've had to deal with analyzing one SIGSEGV after another...
    64. Re:There's a good reason by efuseekay · · Score: 1

      >> The players easily adapt to the fantasy world of D&D, so their beliefs can be changed easily than others.

      Eh, how does this follow? Adaptiblity != Gullibility.

      In the real world, we call it "flexibility". Good role players can play several characters at once, and imagine the amount of *thinking* one required to do that. In fact, good role players are more akin to authors, who has to go into the shoes of their characters when writing novels.

      I would think that D+D players will probably make very good Mossad members!

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    65. Re:There's a good reason by deft · · Score: 1

      He's also forgetting that the black statue outside the coliseum in LA depicting the perfect body, is modeled from Terry Schroeder, the hole set (center in basketball) for the US Olympic team. You ever see a real polo player and you'll see the widest lats you've ever seen. I'm pretty damn big and the 'center'

      Just because your friend was big didnt make him out of shape (he could very well have been though)... take a look at the offensive line of a football team and you'll call them fat, right before they break you in half and eat you as a snack.

      I happen to be 6/5, 240, set records at my school for scoring, ran a marathon, and preferred what I seem to remember as chaotic neutral so I could f with people.

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    66. Re:There's a good reason by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's just a ploy to get the Enemy to think these lowly-classified people are worthless and thus underestimate them so that they might be able to catch spies, etc.?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    67. Re:There's a good reason by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

      You say "impressionable," I say, "highly adaptive." There's always more than one way to look at a situation.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    68. Re:There's a good reason by Cederic · · Score: 1


      His post is also naive - he seems to think the Marines will give him a chance to defend the freedoms he has.

      So yes, he does need to be lectured.

      ~Cederic

    69. Re:There's a good reason by drsquare · · Score: 1

      So in other words, you're a big fat bastard who plays a homosexual's sport and nerd board games?

      Also I thought the statue of the 'perfect body' was that one by Michaelangelo hundreds of years ago?

    70. Re:There's a good reason by drxenos · · Score: 1

      But how can you make that assertion when you have met only two? Using that logic, you can make any claim.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    71. Re:There's a good reason by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      I haven't "only met two". I've known, to date, 6 D&D'ers, 5 of whom have emotional problems. I just chose two stories to tell. Yes I know its not a scientific sample, yes I know its not absolute proof. I don't see you questioning on the guy who says that D&D guys are "creative and intelligent?" you seem to have accepted that premise on even less proof.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  8. Activates "anti-troll" shield... by BTWR · · Score: 1
    **Activates "anti-troll" shield against off-topic anti-Israel rants***

    Activated! Your idiotic rants now effortlessly bounce off me!

    1. Re:Activates "anti-troll" shield... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sends

      BTWR$echo "God gave Palestine to Israel... it's in the bible people" > /dev/null

  9. D&D or LARP? by tsanth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Judging from the article, it seems that the IDF is frowning upon LARPers, not D&Ders per se.

    At least, that's what I get from all the pictures and quotations like "[soon] hundreds of fans are expected to meet in a forest in the southern part of Israel for a two-day game of pure fantasy."

    1. Re:D&D or LARP? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      Apparently, the journalists in question or the IDF is unable to distinguish between your garden variety role players and LARPers.

      Nevermind the whole can of worms opened up by the fact that D&D is just so 80's. There are generations of games that have come and gone to supplant D&D.

      Someone is stuck in the 70's.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:D&D or LARP? by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Funny
      "[soon] hundreds of fans are expected to meet in a forest in the southern part of Israel for a two-day game of pure fantasy."
      That's no way to refer to the peace talks!
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:D&D or LARP? by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      Its a persistant thing. Just because it is new doesn't mean that it is better (will this statement get me thrown out of geekdom?). I am asuming that the writer has lumped D&D and AD&D together, but as far as things go it is a pretty enduring system. Very straightforward in its basics, with lots of room for expansion.
      Though as a gamer it pains me to not seen a line drawn between regular gamers and LARPers... Between them and the SCA folks, they make reular tabletop gamers look downright normal (though lacking in hiegenics and weight control issues (when you are 240lb and everyone else at the table can truely call you tiny, thats an issue)).

    4. Re:D&D or LARP? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      I've been roleplaying for nearly 23 years now, and I've never had the least bit of inclination to put on armor and hunt for make-believe monsters in the woods, or beat the shit out of some guy with a bamboo stick.

      I have a friend that regularly goes to SCA events. The only reason he does this is that he hopes to get laid. He had a pretty good story about four lesbian SCAers in a tent who ran around naked.

      Hmmm... Where was that application form?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:D&D or LARP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote: "hundreds of fans are expected to meet in a forest in the southern part of Israel for a two-day game of pure fantasy."

      Actually they're all gonna pretend they have had sex. Well I guess that could be considered a fantasy.

    6. Re:D&D or LARP? by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      The only time that I even dress up at all is when I go hunting my favorite species, Man. Somehow I find it hard to imagine any military service having issues with me practicing shooting and small unit tactics (good old paintball).

    7. Re:D&D or LARP? by corporatemutantninja · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Not to be terribly prejudicial, but that would make a little more sense. I mean, those SCA guys are just weeeeeeeeird.

      No, seriously, it has always struck me as rather odd that guys who sit around and collaboratively make up stories, be it about dragons or spaceships or spies, are considered weird, and yet guys who sit around memorizing and arguing passionately about statistics for rich athletes who they've never met and never will is considered perfectly normal. The athletes may be real but it's still fantasy to live vicariously through them. I think going out and PLAYING sports with my buddies is better than either, but for some reason being a sports fanatic is normal and RPGing is strange. I don't get it.

      --
      Actually, I was trying to be Insightful, not Funny.
    8. Re:D&D or LARP? by nidarus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, it's the fault of the people who translated the original (Hebrew) article. The original piece mentioned RD&D, or "Real D&D", which is a general Israeli term for LARPs.

    9. Re:D&D or LARP? by dswensen · · Score: 1

      Judging from the article, it seems that the IDF is frowning upon LARPers...

      And really, who doesn't?

    10. Re:D&D or LARP? by ChewbaccaD · · Score: 1

      I've never had the least bit of inclination to... beat the shit out of some guy with a bamboo stick I have, but it usually has far more to do with my lousy commute than it does with any tabletop gaming :)

    11. Re:D&D or LARP? by ChewbaccaD · · Score: 1

      silly typo... I've never had the least bit of inclination to... beat the shit out of some guy with a bamboo stick. I have, but it usually has far more to do with my lousy commute than it does with any tabletop gaming :)

    12. Re:D&D or LARP? by c0dedude · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, fine. We all know LARPers are huge fucking losers.

      --
      Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    13. Re:D&D or LARP? by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      I don't get it either. Society is very selective about which activities are considered okay and which ones are not. (cf. alcohol consumption, smoking, WWF, video games)

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    14. Re:D&D or LARP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you've been lied to. It was four *gay* SCAdians in a tent who ran around naked. If your buddy gets laid in the SCA, its by a chick with Fred Flinstone feet, or by another guy.

    15. Re:D&D or LARP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, plenty of sex in SCA events, and plenty of hot chicks, too. Of course, there are some really ugly people there as well, but that's normal in the USA (SCA = USA, mostly).

    16. Re:D&D or LARP? by Talahamut · · Score: 1

      ...and yet guys who sit around memorizing and arguing passionately about statistics for rich athletes who they've never met and never will is considered perfectly normal.

      Nope, those guys are considered world-class annoying dorks too...

    17. Re:D&D or LARP? by henrybrice · · Score: 1

      And the article is wrong in another point - it isn't that they all get low security clearence, but that they are sent to an army psycologist (which many people are before going into IDF, it's quite standard) who will then decide whether or not this person is mentaly unsuitable. Aparently less than 50% of those referred had any change in the security clearence, and most of them in was a very small difference. I go to a school full or LARPers, and many of them went into or are in the midst of going into high-security-clearence jobs.

  10. Looking for a few good men? by ackthpt · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    "They're detached from reality and suscepitble to influence," the army says.

    After following a lot of the news regarding reprisals against palestinians and realizing the IDF acts with a higher degree of autonomy than US forces, I've wondered who-the-heck's influencing them. I've known a considerable variety of people who have played D&D and/or been active in the SCA (The Society for Creative Anachronism) and find most are no more delusional that your average baseball fan, stamp collector or technology geek. I rather expect it's more along the lines of these people really not being easily subverted, unlike some ultra patriot who will do whatever a commanding officer says, even it would strike the man-on-the-street as an outrage.

    To launch Air To Ground missiles into civilian areas, which may harm innocent bystanders, plow people's homes because they live too close to the egyptian border and enforce some kind of colonial marshall law in a ghetto takes a special personality, quite likely someone who can be easily broken down and then built up into a new unquestioning soldier, rather than someone who can think for themselves and consider 'hey, this isn't right'

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Looking for a few good men? by BTWR · · Score: 1
      To launch Air To Ground missiles into civilian areas, which may harm innocent bystanders

      Glad to see someone is talking out against Qassam rockets (you know... the rockets fired at civilians that have so far killed 3 infants and one of their fathers)

    2. Re:Looking for a few good men? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Glad to see someone is talking out against Qassam rockets [bbc.co.uk] (you know... the rockets fired at civilians that have so far killed 3 infants and one of their fathers)

      I don't rely exclusively upon US news sources and listen to the BBC regularly. I'm constantly disappointed when I hear of these iniquities, yet most people in my home town are rather convinced that the palestinians somehow deserved it. Sad... Small wonder there are so many volunteers to strap bombs to their bodies and die for their people. It's all that's left to a desperate people. (I don't justify it, but I understand their point of view. Peace begins with justice and there's been too little of it.)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Looking for a few good men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly people like BTWR are much to self righteous to be reasoned with.

      Hence the suicide bombers.

    4. Re:Looking for a few good men? by BTWR · · Score: 1
      interesting how when people have differing opinions, instead of debating them on facts and logic, they simply ramble with saying like they're "much to [sic] self righteous to be reasoned with."

      Must be easier to avoid reasoning with someone by typing that they can't be reasoned with...

    5. Re:Looking for a few good men? by incabulos · · Score: 1

      Ditto. The cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy in labeling those who make and launch Qassam rockets as terrorists, while the IDF blow up crowds of innocent palestinians with their own rockets on a regular basis is mind-boggling.

      I cant imagine how mentally damaged and dysfunctional the average IDF soldier must be to endose and carry out atrocities like this.. Its no small wonder their generals are screening out independant thinkers in favour of people more easily moulded into mindless unquestioning killing machines.

    6. Re:Looking for a few good men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to what I like to call "bill oreilly" syndrome. I am really embarrassed to be a US citizen right now. I am sorry for the things we are doing. I wish my vote really did make a difference, but I'm afraid it doesn't. There are just too many religious freaks in this country. On the other side, there are too many religous freaks running the "Islam" side of things. Lets all learn a lesson and point the missiles at the churches.... just an idea.

    7. Re:Looking for a few good men? by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Not actually "Air To Ground missiles", seing as they are ground-launched, but nice try. Oh, and how many innocent civilians have Israeli missiles killed? A lot more than 4, that's for sure.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    8. Re:Looking for a few good men? by BTWR · · Score: 1
      Quit your whining...

      I wish my vote really did make a difference, but I'm afraid it doesn't

      It did count. Your vote (I assume for Kerry) counted. You just didn't win. One side has to lose every election. That's how it works.

      There are just too many religious freaks in this country

      What a beacon of thinking and tolerance you practice...

      For the record, I voted for Kerry. My vote counted the same as every other American's. We lost. That's life.

    9. Re:Looking for a few good men? by BTWR · · Score: 1
      Nice deflection. But... I'll bite. Quassam rocket casualties: 100% civilians, 0% military targets (and civilians ARE the targets). Israeli strikes: big percentage targetted at terrorists. Yes, accidental civilian deaths occur (and never at civilians, despite what your radical websites would have you believe...)

      Have you ever seen Hamas apologize when they hit a baby? Never. An Israeli soldier who kills a baby palestinian can and will be jailed.

    10. Re:Looking for a few good men? by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      Deflection? Me? Are you for real? The OP was clearly talking about Israeli helicopters firing missiles into builtup areas, and you pretended to believe that in fact it was talking about terrorist rocket attacks on Israeli civilians. I was just returning the thread to the original point, so where do you get off accusing me of deflection?

      Have you ever seen Hamas apologize when they hit a baby? Never. An Israeli soldier who kills a baby palestinian can and will be jailed.

      Rubbish. There have been a few prosecutions for the more extreme examples, but this is not routine, as you imply. Or - just to take one example - can you tell me which Israeli soldier was jailed for killing 3 year old Burhan al-Himuni in December 2001?

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not condoning terrorism, and Israel has the right to defend its citizens. But its methods are so incredibly blunt, the enormous number of noncombatants killed is just sickening. Israel has lost any claim to the moral high ground.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  11. yeah right by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

    Those aren't D&D players, they're leaked pics from Israeli military training and they don't want to admit it. Blaming it on D&D, where's the love?

    1. Re:yeah right by Cassius105 · · Score: 1

      Im a D&D player and i admit im weird :)

  12. I Agree by SenFo · · Score: 1

    Sorry to makek fun of some the regulars, but every D&D player I've ever met is weird. I don't even want to work with them.

    1. Re:I Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Agreed! I know quite a few.. they are very anti social, they are fat, they look funny, and they SMELL REAL BAD. Not someone you'd like to be around for too long.

    2. Re:I Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My roommate plays D&D. He doesn't wear deodorant.

  13. I wouldn't trust 'em either. by Peldor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Players are always trying to peek behind the DM's screen so they can see what's coming up next. Cheating on the dice rolls, making up munchkin characters, sneaking a look at the monster manual, etc. Untrustworthy, the whole lot of em.

    1. Re:I wouldn't trust 'em either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oblig PA Link.
      Would you trust that group in combat?

    2. Re:I wouldn't trust 'em either. by Max_Wells_SH · · Score: 1

      Players are always trying to peek behind the DM's screen so they can see what's coming up next. Cheating on the dice rolls, making up munchkin characters, sneaking a look at the monster manual, etc. Untrustworthy, the whole lot of em. Exactly. It's bad enough in a session when a player spies the loot first and feeds his supposed comrades to the orc patrol so he can have it to himself--or just backstabs them in the middle of the night. Now I would want these kinds of situations in real-life combat? Even that aside, could you imagine fighting in an actual war with D&D players? Non-stop complaining about the "unfair" PKing! Count me out. I applaud the Israeli Army's clear-headed position--if only I could say the same for my GM.

      --
      I read Slashdot for the articles.
  14. ha by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "which entails directing the game and controlling the labyrinth, "

    somebody watched 1 too many bad tv 'movies' in the 70's.

    plus, those wherre pictures of LARPers.... freaks. ;)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  15. Scary by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

    I think there are certain things that should be warning signs... I like Star Trek, if I sign up to be in the navy and say that, they might laugh... if I show up at the navy dressed in full costume, they have something to worry about, and probably shouldn't give me any position with any access (read security clearence) as I'm probably not the most mentally stable person... don't you think that's pruedent?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like Star Trek, if I sign up to be in the navy and say that, they might laugh... if I show up at the navy dressed in full costume, they have something to worry about

      Nooo, only if you show up as yellow-shirt. Or if it's crotch-less.

    2. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean yellow shirt before TNG time or yellow shirt during/after TNG time?

    3. Re:Scary by lgw · · Score: 1

      That's really the point I think. It's not so much people who play D&D I wouldn't trust, but people who volunteer that information in what's basically a job interview ... that's messed up. :)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  16. occupational psychologists ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    occupational?

    double-entendre there? maybe?

  17. +1 smartbomb by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is a bomb an "edged weapon"? Maybe the IDF just doesn't want clerics to know they have a better chance "to hit" with a guided missile than with a war hammer, mace or morningstar.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:+1 smartbomb by mrmagos · · Score: 1
      No, it is a type of ammunition that is bludgeoning, fired from an Exotic weapon. I don't know about you, but I can think of much better ways to spend a feat. Plus, it's generally a bad idea to fire one of those off at close range, unless you're the type that likes to drop Meteor Swarm on your party. ;)

      --
      If it's free, it's for me!

      --
      Never start vast projects with half-vast ideas.
    2. Re:+1 smartbomb by fizban · · Score: 2, Funny

      I saw the words bomb and clerics and could only think of one thing...

      One...Two...Five!

      Three Sir!

      Three!

      --

      +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

    3. Re:+1 smartbomb by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised we haven't had more jokes about unholy handgrenades. Which part of "Thou Shall Not Kill" is so hard to understand (except the medieval lisp of "y" -> "th")?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:+1 smartbomb by cynyr · · Score: 1

      not to admit to anything.... but that sounds like a magic missle

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  18. Maybe /. eds should start reading FARK by blair1q · · Score: 1

    because damn... the same story was posted there a long time ago (and why aren't links to it working?)

    1. Re:Maybe /. eds should start reading FARK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thread#1392670

      from 11AM today.

    2. Re:Maybe /. eds should start reading FARK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding, both stories posted by CmdrTaco are from Fark.

  19. Nooo! by Cassius105 · · Score: 1

    My dreams of joining the IDF are shattered!

    *crys*

    1. Re:Nooo! by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Thus your dreams of getting hot american teenage girls who visit Israel are also shattered.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    2. Re:Nooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but if you in fact are a D&D player, your dreams of becoming a decent human being are shattered as well! (As well as your late night dreams of ever touching a naked woman)

  20. The IDF Should Employ Me by PepeGSay · · Score: 1

    My level 71 thief can get all the "security clearance" I need. I'll send my level 72 Ogre in with my level 74 Mage and work out that whole middle east issue with a few rolls of the dice.

  21. I especially enjoyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    the Jack Chick pictures of girls playing D&D.

    1. Re:I especially enjoyed by CSMastermind · · Score: 1

      Most of the times I've played there's been girls there. Someone we know from school or a girlfreind who's curious.

    2. Re:I especially enjoyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I mean, the guy thinks God talks to him on a regular basis and that there is an international satanist conspiracy. Ok, I can let that slide. But girls playing D&D? He's clearly dillusional.

    3. Re:I especially enjoyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are female D&D players. My girlfrind and I trade off being DM for our group ( 3 guys, 2 girls ). Female players are usually better roleplayers anyway. Not to be sterotypical, but most girls I know are not into Hack'n'Slash RPGs.

      Miles Teg

  22. Personality faults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    have personality traits that make them a lower security risk

    Surely you mean more of a security risk?

    I'd also argue that people who indulge in fantasy games have a tendency to be morally rigid and idealistic -- a bad trait in a soldier.

  23. Isn't there a policy... by Shamanin · · Score: 1

    of don't ask don't tell!

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  24. qsl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, you know, if they are D&D players, they are security risks.

    First girl to show a little skin, and your entire North Atlantic operations become a blustered marriage proposal.

    Can you imagine what secrets would be divulged if you let them get to third base?

    1. Re:qsl by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      So that explains the whole Robert Novak/Valerie Plame thing . . . Robert must be quite the sexy beast.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  25. I bet it's an independent thought thing by nurd68 · · Score: 1

    I find that gamers are much better at independent thought and analysis, and are, in general, much more creative than non-gamers. (This is not a 100% correlation. Indeed, many gamers are complete weenies. However, a former employer hired several people out of my gaming group and was specifically asking me for more of them, because they were engineers, programmers and technicians who could come up with more inventive solutions, so it does hold some water). Anyway, this is often contrary to military and security needs.

    1. Re:I bet it's an independent thought thing by deft · · Score: 1

      "However, a former employer hired several people out of my gaming group and was specifically asking me for more of them, because they were engineers, programmers and technicians"

      I'm sure your former employer was looking for engineers, programmers, and technicians that happneed to be in a group (D&D players) that he could tap for the skills he needed, not the other way around. I doubt D&D played any part in it.

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    2. Re:I bet it's an independent thought thing by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      >> I find that gamers are much better at independent thought and analysis

      You haven't been to your local card/comic shop or GameStop in a while, have you?

  26. But... but... by Xaroth · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't want to be in the Army any more! I want to be Debbie!

    (Attn: Read the Jack Chick tract before modding this offtopic.)

    1. Re:But... but... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I which I could mod you funny.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  27. Heh. Should I turn myself in now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty funny. Of my dozen-or-so junior high/high school D&D friends, there are now two lieutenant colonels, one captain (he signed up very late in life), and three more of us with DOD security clearances out in the real world. All USA, I should say; D&D has never come up in any of my investigations...

  28. I used D&D to control my parents' minds. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    I had a collection of 1980s Dragon Magazines. One of them had an editorial about a brochure that had been circulating, that advertised Dungeons & Dragons as an excellent way to learn hypnotism, control your parents minds, and force them to buy you more D&D books. The editorial did a little digging, and discovered who had published the brochure, but I've forgotten.

    The weird thing about it, is to think that people would go out of their way to make D&D look bad. I mean, if you think it's bad, that's your deal, but wtf do you get from villainizing it? It was strange to my 12 year old mind.

    Anyway. Adults who are into live action roleplayers are detached from reality. That's the goal. Maybe the Israeli army is onto something.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:I used D&D to control my parents' minds. by rcastro0 · · Score: 1

      (...)Dungeons & Dragons as an excellent way to learn hypnotism, control your parents minds, and force them to buy you more D&D books.

      Wow, I knew about Pokemon -- D&D too ?

      --
      Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
    2. Re:I used D&D to control my parents' minds. by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      The weird thing about it, is to think that people would go out of their way to make D&D look bad. I mean, if you think it's bad, that's your deal, but wtf do you get from villainizing it? It was strange to my 12 year old mind.

      Anyway. Adults who are into live action roleplayers are detached from reality.


      Put 2 and 2 together. You yourself do not; but if you look at many other people's reactions over LARPers--and if I may take this to the far end of the hostility scale, fursuiters--look at the villainizing that happens. These people are in their own world; and when we go into that world and are disturbed by what we see, we somehow extend our disapproval of their activities into ad hominem attacks against their characters, when they have done nothing to harm us. I think it's the detatchment from reality that we criticize subconsciously.

  29. d n d by dmf415 · · Score: 1

    I roll the dice .......
    i have just inflicted 7 hit points of damage upon you , aa haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

  30. D&D Players by elecngnr · · Score: 1

    I do not understand what their problem is. D&D players are a productive bunch of people who are driven, goal orientated.........ohhh, I have to finish this later, it is my fighter/wizard/theif's turn to attack the dragon. I use my +5 Sword of....

    --
    Having done so much with so little for so long, I now can do anything with nothing at all.
  31. I put on my Wizard hat and Robe! by Gorbie · · Score: 1

    HARRRRR!!!

    1. Re:I put on my Wizard hat and Robe! by Gorbie · · Score: 1

      http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/bloodninja.ph p

      Just in case you didn't get it...

    2. Re:I put on my Wizard hat and Robe! by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 1

      Bastard. You made me spit my drink on my keyboard!

    3. Re:I put on my Wizard hat and Robe! by Gorbie · · Score: 1

      :D

      http://www.adamchance.com/funny.htm

      is a better link ;)

  32. Real swords? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If I interviewed people who thougth D&D was played with real swords, I'd downgrade their security clearance too - because I wouldn't think they were bright enough to trust with secrets.

    1. Re:Real swords? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If I interviewed someone that thought D&D was played with real swords, I'd ask to see his biceps and battle scars.

      Real swords are heavy and SHARP.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  33. You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
    If you play D&D you realize that "gaming the system" gets you in Shitsville with the game referee (the much maligned "Dungeon Master"). So if anything, D&D players are LESS inclined to "game the system".

    Gaming the system means thinking out-of-box. Believe me, you don't want that in a soldier.

    1. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bullshit. US military doctrine is built on soldiers who are flexible, able, and motivated. They don't want to see it in bootcamp, or expressed in ways deemed harmful to the unit. But they count on the fact they'll see it expressed in ways harmful to the enemy.

    2. Re:You got it wrong by code_nerd · · Score: 1

      A platoon of guys like Bobby Shaftoe would be a dangerous thing indeed (for the enemy).

    3. Re:You got it wrong by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What the hell do you know, you clown? Some crap you read in a 1987 issue of TIME magazine about why US soldiers are superior to those of the downtrodden zombie-like communist horde?

      I don't have much to contribute to this site in the critique obscure code, but I did play D&D, AD&D, Gamma World, GURPS, and cyberpunk 2020. Furthermore I spent 2 years in the Headquarters company of the 2/75th Airborne Ranger regiment in Ft. Lewis WA as a mortar gunner.

      All military doctrine is built on absolute discipline, and the better the unit the more severe the discipline. Do you think truck drivers are subjected to the same discipline as SEALS? No, because 1) they would die 2) their jobs don't require it. Good combat units have as much or more rigorous discipline than bootcamp, and the only flexibility allowed is in the 2 minute warmup prior to an 8 mile run. If somebody has a neat new idea, here's the procedure: you mention it to your immediate superior, get laughed at and/or disciplined, and then proceed in doing things the tried and tested way. For the love of god, I tell you these guys still spend half an hour every day polishing their non-waterproof boots because the officers don't trust any footwear that's seen less than 30 years of war.

      I was gonna add: if the Israeli army doesn't want weirdos who have a skewed sense of reality in their ranks, then they probably shouldn't accept fundamentalist religious types who believe the earth is 6000 years old or that god will send you to hell for all eternity for eating a goat, what with cloven hooves being unclean and all.

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    4. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appearently, I know more history than you. Perhaps the reason you were ridiculed and discounted is because YOUR ideas are stupid.

      Needless to say there are countless examples which would support the argument.

    5. Re:You got it wrong by martyn+s · · Score: 3, Funny

      WTF? First of all, goats are kosher. Second of all, an animal MUST have cloven hooves to be Kosher. If it doesn't have cloven hooves it CAN'T be eaten.

    6. Re:You got it wrong by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      Flamebaiting aside, the article does not say that the Israeli army does not want D&D players. It says they are not granted security clearances as easily. This is a different issue and one I agree with you about. I don't see a good reason for it. It implies that D&D players are not as good at keeping secrets. Upon reflection, I wonder how you can really design a good test for this criterion?

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    7. Re:You got it wrong by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shh ... you'll ruin his happy ignorance.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:You got it wrong by Zeinfeld · · Score: 0, Troll
      Bullshit. US military doctrine is built on soldiers who are flexible, able, and motivated. They don't want to see it in bootcamp, or expressed in ways deemed harmful to the unit. But they count on the fact they'll see it expressed in ways harmful to the enemy.

      They want very particular types of initiative, in particular the initiative to take command of a situation when necessary. What they do not want is people who question authority.

      If the US army was such a terrifically well run organization they would not have ended up turning the Iraqi prison camps into torture chambers. Either there is a serious discipline problem or the senior officers gave illegal orders that the soldiers had a duty to refuse. That little fiasco is one of the reasons why there are car bombs going off every day and the insurgency is increasing. It is also on of the reasons why recruitment is 25% under target.

      D&D probably does make someone unsuited to military service, but so what? It probably means that they are better adjusted as a person. The Israeli army has been performing a brutal occupation of the West Bank and Gaza for over thirty years. Refusing to serve in such an army is a moral duty.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    9. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      but I guess the non-brutal, loving members of Hezbollah probably roll play all the time. "ok ali - roll this 20 sided dice to see how many children you killed on the bus you just suicide bombed"

    10. Re:You got it wrong by Proaxiom · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If the US army was such a terrifically well run organization they would not have ended up turning the Iraqi prison camps into torture chambers. Either there is a serious discipline problem or the senior officers gave illegal orders that the soldiers had a duty to refuse.

      I work with a retired Air Force Captain who has the same perspective. As he explains it, either the officers ordered the troops to mistreat the prisoners, or they didn't have control of their troops. Neither is excusable for an officer in the armed forces.

      The corollary being that the soldiers who are taking the blame for it are, in a way, scapegoats, because the liability goes up the chain and somebody is getting away with it.

      They want very particular types of initiative, in particular the initiative to take command of a situation when necessary. What they do not want is people who question authority.

      I did some research a while back on the differences between eastern and western military doctrine in World War II. One of the keys was the the Soviets, for various reasons, allowed very little command flexibility in their ranks. Operations were planned to extremely minute details and all subordinates were expected to stick to the plan no matter what (one big reason was they had poor communications infrastructure to change the plan dynamically).

      The west, in contrast, had less detailed plans, and relied on their officers adapting their tactics to the facts on the ground as they appeared.

    11. Re:You got it wrong by M1FCJ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Erm, you don't join to the Israeli army, you get drafted in. It's not a matter of they want you or not, if you live in Israel and a Jew, you will end up in the army and will keep rank and title for the rest of your life, as a reserve.

    12. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry, I disagree.

      While discipline IS essential, absolute discipline is not. Possibly the most important thing for an elite unit is being smart and adaptable. If you receive an order to destroy an enemy observation post so a surprise attack can occur, but find a machine gun nest with a good field of fire, it may be more important to destroy that first. You need to be smart to realize that is more important, and adaptable to change your plans to cope with it. If you blindly follow your orders, more people are going to die.

      Smart + Adaptable > absolute discipline

      If absolute discipline were all that was required of an elite unit, why would intelligence be a requirement for those elite units? Want to join the SEALs, Marine Force Recon, FAST Battalion or Green Berets? You better be able to score well on general intelligence tests and on practical tests within your field. If discipline was the be-all end-all of elite units then they would be full of people who couldn't think their way out of a wet paper bag.

      BTW - While I was at the SEAL training facility in Virginia, they didn't worry about polished boots. They didn't worry about having their utilities pressed. They didn't worry about their appearance. They worried about what their job was and how to be ready for it.

      I played D&D, AD&D, Top Secret, Gamma World, Boot Hill, Top Secret SI and Robotech. I also MUDed way too many hours.

      I was also a Marine Rifleman. I served with the Fleet Antiterrorism Security Team (FAST) Co. Have achievement medals from the Marines and the Army (Joint Operation). Was a squad leader and a platoon sergeant and a company gunnery sergeant; and I wanted people who could think on their own in my squad/platoon/company.

      Also, the Marines doctrine was based on mission accomplishment and not absolute discipline. So your statement of "all military doctrine" kind of goes out the window.

    13. Re:You got it wrong by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 4, Insightful

      was gonna add: if the Israeli army doesn't want weirdos who have a skewed sense of reality in their ranks, then they probably shouldn't accept fundamentalist religious types who believe the earth is 6000 years old or that god will send you to hell for all eternity for eating a goat, what with cloven hooves being unclean and all.

      Funny you should mention that. Orthodox are not subject to the draft.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    14. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US Armys training is an international joke.

      I guess thats why they are called in all over the world to train other nations forces? I guess thats why in every war involving our troops vs other troops we have had less casualties? You are seriously mistaken if you think soldiers in North Korea, Iran, Bulgaria, or Brazil are given the same level of training as US special forces.

    15. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Um... No. Ultra-Orthodox people get an extension of release from Draft, much as some students in universitites do. The fact that it is indefinite, is a different issue. Orthodox men serve in the military. Orthodox -women- are not subject to draft, unless they want to be.

      --To the post above concerning religious fanatics--

      A) if we didn't eat cloven hooves, we'd all be vegetarian.
      B) it is a known issue in the army that Orthodox boys and girls do not make good soldiers. The reason, however, is that they learn too much independent thought, and are encouraged to constantly question the system. If you are so ignorant of Judaism that you confuse the simplest and most commonly known rules of it, however, I can't expect you to figure out other elementaries.

    16. Re:You got it wrong by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

      Um... No. Ultra-Orthodox people get an extension of release from Draft, much as some students in universitites do.

      Good point. There is a distinction between orthodox and ultra-orthodox I missed.

      The fact that it is indefinite, is a different issue.

      If an extension is indefinate, that person is not subject to the draft. Same idea with women, if you can choose not to enter the military, you are not subject to a draft. Let's not quibble with indefinate extensions.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    17. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You don't have a clue. US military doctrine is built on soldiers who are robots and do not think. The US Armys training is an international joke. Your soldiers are given assault rifles that do not fire fully-automatic because they are deemed inadequetly trained to be responsible for managing their ammo, ffs.


      I've always enjoyed people who know nothing about the military talking serious shit. The US Army trains its soldiers to function within tight parameters, but rewards improvisation when needed. In Army parlance this is often known as "taking the initiative".

      Indeed three round burst has been deemed standard on the M16A2 due to ammo management issues, especially in the hands of non-combat support troops (although in reality all troops are now combat capable.. just ask the 88m's getting their asses shot off). What you've left out is that we've seen more combat in the US military in the last 30 years than any other military with the possible exception of the now defunct Soviet Union, and a castrated '16 is what works.

      Any standard soldier in pretty much any other first world nation army is trained to the equivalant of your special forces. Christ, Canadian Militia units aka weekend warriors go over to train with your soldiers and mop the floor with them on excercise.


      Wrong. Canadian military units with the ONE EXCEPTION of JTF-2 are pathetic. Drop some 25th ID action on that candy Canadian ass and you'll have moose stew before sundown. My personal favorite is William Tell '96, where the Canadian Air Force domainated for much the same reason our reserve forces down here used to dominate such "contests": while line units are out KILLING PEOPLE or on ACTIVE DEPLOYMENT, the brave troopers of Canuckistan are busy in garrison masturbating to the motions to satisfy the EXACT REQUIREMENTS of the next GAME errr contest.

      Don't even get me started on the Europeans.

      Christ, Canadian Militia units aka weekend warriors go over to train with your soldiers and mop the floor with them on excercise.


      Cite? This sounds like another acute case of short-dicked Canadian syndrome to me. I know some folks in Candian Army up in Edmonton, and they even admit they're a fucking joke over a few beers.
    18. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason, however, is that they learn too much independent thought, and are encouraged to constantly question the system. If you are so ignorant of Judaism that you confuse the simplest and most commonly known rules of it, however, I can't expect you to figure out other elementaries.

      Yeah, sure... whatever.

    19. Re:You got it wrong by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 0, Troll

      I sure did. What I meant was, if the valiant Sons of Moses are confronted by a Swedish-made anti-Muslim bacon-and-egg-sandwich minefield, they will be forced to retreat in disarray, since if they accidentally eat any ham then the benevolent, all knowing and merciful Lord will transmit them into lakes of burning brimstone for all eternity, where they will be tormented by demons with pointy sticks.

      Goat-sandwiches are cool with God tho, since goats chew the "cud" (whatever the hell that is.)

      Interestingly, I see that eating whalemeat will earn you a one-way ticket to eternal flaming hotness since whales are mammals that don't chew the cud. I bet a bunch of folks a few hundred years ago showed up real surprised at the gates of hell and said "WTF do you mean whales are mammals? I thought it was a fish!"

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    20. Re:You got it wrong by ivrcti · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry, you're confusing self discipline in personal details with conformation to doctrinal procedures. As an avid D&D player in High School, a West Point grad and an ex M1 officer, I can tell you that if you can't think on your feet and figure out a new way to skin the cat, you won't survive long in mobile armored warfare, let alone dismounted urban warfare.

      Recognize also the level you were working at and your particular unit. You didn't get to see how creative your battalion commander had to get to handle his missions with the incredibly lean Ranger force.

      If you still doubt me, go back to some of the officers you admired most and ask them about operational and tactical flexibility. Get comfortable, you'll be there a while.

    21. Re:You got it wrong by Guysdrinkingbeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.
      - General George Patton Jr

      --
      Great people don't need people to complete them, great people complete other people. -- Matthew Pawlikowski.
    22. Re:You got it wrong by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      Goat-sandwiches are cool with God tho, since goats chew the "cud" (whatever the hell that is.)
      It's sort of their owen puke. It's marginally better than what rabbits do.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    23. Re:You got it wrong by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      if we didn't eat cloven hooves, we'd all be vegetarian.
      WTF? Because horses have cloven hooves. Oh, and so do chickens, ducks and geese. And crocobloodydiles, and hipposoddingpotamuses. And camels. Then there's kangaroos, and what about animals with no feet at all, such as snakes and wichiti grubs?
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    24. Re:You got it wrong by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 1

      Yeah I forgot Robotech, that was an awesome game. Gladiator mechs rule, but they looked kind of fat, so I used Excaliburs.

      Now to your post: the reason high scores on aptitude tests are required for elite units is not because they show that you're a smart person. Rather they show that you're not a total dumbass. The kind of dumbass who should never be trusted with large amounts of explosives in politically sensitive areas (eg. the catastrophe at Desert One, where a nameless dumbass ordered a well-disciplined soldier to fire a rocket at a fuel truck, thus turning a "top-secret nighttime desert rendezvous point" into a "bunch of dudes brightly illuminated by furious 200-foot flames visible for hundreds of miles in all directions" right before another dumbass flew his helicopter directly into the back of a parked transport plane, which destroyed our fighting reputation in the middle east for a decade but at least we got the 160th SOAR out of it)

      And if you think that "Smart + Adaptable > absolute discipline" in the mind of any general, you're mad. Leaders wants troops who can be ordered to run headlong across an open field under machine gun and artillery fire without so much as a "Are you fucking nuts!?!" in reply. If you're telling a hundred guys (or maybe a thousand) how to do something more complex than any dozen football games and chess matches combined with the full knowledge of all parties that mistakes will cost lives (and maybe your plan itself even requires it), you don't want no backseat drivers or anyone second guessing or doubting or doing their own thing. Ever see a roomful of Ph.D's** trying to get something done?

      Discipline is the most reliable predictor of mission accomplishment. Smarts are better than dumb, but the ability to stick unswervingly to the plan, even at the cost of your life, is paramount, no question. There's plenty of great soldiers who can hardly read, but there's no such thing as a good soldier who thinks his own personal judgement can ever outweigh his orders. That's why it's a plausible defense for soldiers who participate in massacres and torture to say that they were just following orders.


      **-without a rigorous pecking order

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    25. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said that if we did not eat animals that have cloven hooves, and, since the laws of kosher prohibit eating animals that do not have cloven hooves (and some animals that do) we would therefore be forbiden to eat all meat. I would think that the sentence was clear enough.

    26. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are seriously mistaken if you think soldiers in North Korea, Iran, Bulgaria, or Brazil are given the same level of training as US special forces.

      Hold on there. GP is being a jerk, I have military friends who are very much competent, but read his statement again:

      Any standard soldier in pretty much any other first world nation army is trained to the equivalant of your special forces

      MAYBE Brazil qualifies as first world. As for the rest...

    27. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, sir, it wasn't.

      BTW, my religion prohibits me from eating potato chips. Mashed potato is fine, but I'm not allowed to eat fried potato slices.

      Please respect me.

    28. Re:You got it wrong by hey! · · Score: 1

      Interesting post.

      Of course you want discipline, you want to make sure that if your strategy says a unit is going to be at place X at time Y doing Z, you don't want somebody coming up with a better idea. Probably the reason I'd never make a decent soldier -- too much ADHD.

      But I wonder if you might not be be exaggerating the evils of thinking on your feet just a bit. So, you have a battle plan that's gone to hell, and a squad that's being lead by a senior sargeant with twenty years of training under his belt. Is he really supposed to sit on his ass and wait for orders from on high?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    29. Re:You got it wrong by johnalex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back when I was an undergraduate, a History professor had this saying taped to his door:

      "The reason the American Army is so good at war is that war is chaos, and the American military practices chaos on a daily basis." - From a World War II German Army War Manual

      --
      JA
      http://www.johnalex.org/
    30. Re:You got it wrong by Swamii · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, your post is ignorant on so many levels, where do I begin..

      For starters, Jews don't believe in a hell. In Scripture God lays out some foods that are healthy and others that are unhealthy. If we break that law, we are not going to the lakes of burning brimstone; your Christian religionist leaders invented that one.

      Perhaps coincidentally, virtually all the unhealthy foods God mentions are all scientifically proven as unhealthy. A vast majority of the dietary laws are against the eating of scavengers, vultures, bottom-feeders; food that has proven to be unhealthy for humans to eat. There are a few (such as pig) that people eat today, but perhaps the modern farm-raised pigs of today are different from the wild pigs of Biblical times.

      Chewing the cud: read about it in a science book. It's a way animals, such as cows, digest plants in the most efficient way nature can get them, by regurgitating the food and chewing it, breaking it down so the body can extract more nutrients. It's really an amazing part of nature. And despite biblical man's lack of scientific knowledge, we now know that most animals that chew the cud are indeed healthy for humans to consume because of the science behind chewing the cud.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    31. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I probably would. Your own respect, however, is in doubt.

    32. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you're probably right. I wouldn't give myself a whole lot of respect if I chose my food according to unjustified arbitrary rules invented by a mystical being that didn't actually exist.

      If the laws from the sky said:

      "Thou shalt not eat haggis, because, from the description, it sounds horrible"

      That'd be different.

    33. Re:You got it wrong by BawbBitchen · · Score: 1

      You don't have a clue. US military doctrine is built on soldiers who are robots and do not think. The US Armys training is an international joke. Your soldiers are given assault rifles that do not fire fully-automatic because they are deemed inadequetly trained to be responsible for managing their ammo, ffs.

      You are clueless. An automatic weapon rides up as you fire it and it gets off target. The M16 is very very accurate weapon in the hands of a properly trained soldier. There is no reason for having an automatic mode on it. The 3 round burst in the M16A2 model is perfect for suppressive fire without getting off target, or wasting ammo. The selector level on an AK47 goes from safe, to auto, to semi-auto. The reason it goes to auto 1st is that you cannot hit the broadside of a barn with it from 100 meters, and the user of the weapon is a undiscipline peasant. The US Marines qualify at 800 meters on the M16 and the Army at 300 meters.

      As to the rest of your load of shit, having been in the Army (1st SF) I can tell you we handed the heads to many other nations troops when training and running OPFOR.

      "de oppresso libre"

    34. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I totally agree with you on that. Except, since I think He -does- exist, that's all moot.

    35. Re:You got it wrong by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      but I guess the non-brutal, loving members of Hezbollah probably roll play all the time. "ok ali - roll this 20 sided dice to see how many children you killed on the bus you just suicide bombed"

      I have heard the same type of language from both the IRA and the UVF in Northern Ireland. Remember that Dire Straights line 'two men think their Jesus, one of 'em must be wrong'. When you have two groups of people who think that there is no alternative but to anahilate the other the answer is not to decide which side to join.

      An occupying force that confiscates land to build settlements is intending to annex the occupied territory, building settlements is an act of aggression, not self defense. The one constant in the middle east is that you can rely on both sides in any conflict to act idiotically.

      That is why it is such a bad idea for the US to have built permanent military bases in Iraq, no good is going to come of that. The idea seems to be to try to force the interim government to sign a permanent lease as was done in Cuba and the Philipeans.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    36. Re:You got it wrong by Golias · · Score: 3, Informative

      Part of it has to do with lack of refrigeration.

      Pork doesn't keep very well in hot Israeli climates. Also, salting meat (to remove blood) helps preserve it.

      Furthermore, pigs spread disease. The flu, for example, usually evolves in bird populations, but usually can't be transmitted from birds to humans. It can, however, be passed from birds to pigs, and then a pig with a flu virus can pass it to humans.

      So, if there were no pig farming, we probably would not need to bother with flu shots every year.

      (For the record: I'm not Jewish, just interested in the history of Hebrew law. It is one of the half-dozen-or-so oldest sets of laws we have on record, after all.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    37. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leaders wants troops who can be ordered to run headlong across an open field under machine gun and artillery fire without so much as a "Are you fucking nuts!?!" in reply.

      If you think the way to accomplish that is with discipline and regimentation, then you have absolutely no clue about military history whatsoever.

      What gets a soldier to rush headlong into certain death is a sense of duty. No matter how push-ups you make a person do, he's not going to volunteer to suffer and die unless he is the sort of person who will choose death over allowing others to suffer and die in his place.

      Buy a drink for just about any war veteran and he will proudly tell you that he never gave a fuck about his orders or the politics or the overall mission, but he did some downright crazy things for the sake of his buddies who were standing next to him, getting shot at along with him.

    38. Re:You got it wrong by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 1

      I agree with you %100.

      But the post I replied to said that flexibility and smart troops were the cornerstone of US Military doctrine, and the reason I strongly disagreed was because, while I read similar things and believed them before joining the Army, it became overwhelmingly clear to me by empirical observation that stone cold discipline, not initiative or smarts or anything else, is the core characteristic that US doctrine requires of it's adherents. Pretty much like every army in the world since the beginning of time, I might add.

      I've never heard of a sergeant or officer anywhere in the world who insisted on having smart troops. But all the good leaders are fanatic about arbitrarily-close-to-total discipline. I knew a guy who served under a sergeant major who had lead an infantry squad (6-12 men) in combat patrols in the jungles of Vietnam for 4 YEARS and never, EVER lost a SINGLE MAN. Dozens were wounded, himself 5 times, but every one of them was safer in his care in the midst of a savage close-quarters war than they were driving down the street of their hometown on a Friday night. He was reportedly totally nuts about having everything exactly as he ordered it, and it was, because he was know to check things (such as weapons, rations, shoelaces, or toilet paper) at odd times, like 2AM on wednesday morning or Christmas eve.

      That's the kind of guy who makes the rules in the Army, and that's why I shined my cowhide boots daily and refrained from putting my hands in my pockets on a snowy night without complaining (much).

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    39. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you want discipline, you want to make sure that if your strategy says a unit is going to be at place X at time Y doing Z, you don't want somebody coming up with a better idea

      That's why communications and technology is referred to as a "force multiplier" in the US military. If an officer can look at an active tracking map and see that unit X ran off in another direction, an then can talk to the commander of that unit and find out WTF is going on, it offers vastly greater flexibility.

      In the first Gulf War, the Iraqi army left the front which faced the desert almost completely undefended, because it was simply accepted that there was no way in hell that armor and infantry units from a foreign nation could hope to find their way across that desert. The US, toting along hand-held GPS devices, crossed it easily, and mulched the small force that was in place there.

    40. Re:You got it wrong by humina · · Score: 1
      Well I agree that the fish rots from the head down. The blame unfortunately falls from the tail up in today's corporate culture. "The product didn't work! Fire the engineer and give a raise to the boss." or "The boss destroyed the company. Give her a huge severance package and let her lead the world bank."

      Any references to actual people are totally on accident.

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    41. Re:You got it wrong by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      You're off your nut. Canadian troops have had a huge active deployment rate. We had well over half our forces operating at all times throughout the conflicts in Yugoslavia, and in the last decade we've had troops in El Salvador, Cambodia, the Israeli-Arab border, Angola, Mozambique, Rwanda-Uganda, the Sahara, Somalia and Afganistan.

      And as for the europeans, yeah, quite a lot of them are better trained as well. The British, the French, any of the nordic countries except the Swiss, they all train their troops better, and train them to be resourceful and take inititive. The US training procedures for non-special forces units are specifically designed to turn soldiers into predictable super-specialized drones. And the training periods are very short. I'm sure you're a very proud to be an American, and your soldiers are very brave and have very nice expensive equipment, but that's just a fact. None of which is intended to take away from the training your special forces recieve, they are a very different breed.

      Yeah, there are regiments here in Canada that don't see a whole lot of duty, but there are others that are constantly recruiting and training because most of their soldiers are overseas.

      And as for citing an example, the PLF out of Halifax regularly go down to Vermont and mop the floor with your troops during excercise. Probably all that practice they got in Yugoslavia and Afganistan.

      The problem with the Canadian military is that there aren't enough of them and their toys aren't as nice. But the forces we have are trained a hell of a lot more than average training stateside.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    42. Re:You got it wrong by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information, I wasn't aware of that.

      <shameless plug> Since you're interested in Hebraic Law, I encourage you to visit my blog, I post regularly on some topics that you might find interesting.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    43. Re:You got it wrong by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      You're right about the weapon rising up on fully automatic. Canadian military doctrine says you shouldn't use fully automatic fire with a C7 (an M16 with full auto) at a range greater than 50 meters.

      However, when you're clearing houses or russian style trenches, you should be throwing a grenade and following up with a full auto spray when you whip around the corner. And if you're unfortunate enough to lose your section, you won't be laying down 3 round taps, you'll be grabbing your dead buddies ammo, laying down full auto suppresive fire, and whenever you see someone stick their head up, you take them out with a double tap.

      You also use full auto when you're engaging aircraft and light skin vehicles. Following a tracer to a helicopter with 3 round bursts is not as effective.

      The M16 is designed the way it is for one reason. Because US military doctrine says that its soldiers can't be trusted not to panic, waste all their ammo and get blown apart. Don't get pissed at me, it's right in the manuals.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    44. Re:You got it wrong by Tuross · · Score: 1

      either the officers ordered the troops to mistreat the prisoners, or they didn't have control of their troops.

      Option 3 - liberals and other anti-war wankers had a field day with Macromedia Director et al.

      --
      Matt
      1. Read Slashdot
      2. ???
      3. Profit
    45. Re:You got it wrong by jamiethehutt · · Score: 1

      There are a few (such as pig) that people eat today, but perhaps the modern farm-raised pigs of today are different from the wild pigs of Biblical times.
      No pigs are the same now as they were then, in fact pigs then may well of been healthier because they wont of been intensively farmed. What IS different is our knowledge of bacteria, if your a religious leader trying your best to help your people life a healthy, happy and successful life several thousand years ago a pig (that rolls around in mud) probably doesn't seem healthy. It just made sense.

    46. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The corollary being that the soldiers who are taking the blame for it are, in a way, scapegoats, because the liability goes up the chain and somebody is getting away with it.

      Regardless if the soldiers "just following orders" like the Nuremberg trial guys, or "out of control" as your other alternative suggests, this is no excuse, though.

      They're not just scapegoats. What they did is wrong either way.

    47. Re:You got it wrong by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 1

      Hey you're right, there is no "Jewish Hell," just a bad place called Ghenna where bad folks go when they die for a couple of months. That's very fine! I've always thought that the silliest part of the Christian religion is the idea that an all-loving, all powerful, all knowing and good god would send people off to eternal torment, its and obvious contradiction to me, and contradictions are necessarily false. Except for the circumcision part, I may just convert!
      Thanks, sorry about the misunderstanding. I assumed that the christians got hell from the Jews, since they got most of their ideas there. The more I look , the more it seems like they got their GOOD ideas from the hebrews, and the bad ones are mostly their own. I henceforth heartily approve of the Jewish religion!

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    48. Re:You got it wrong by nutshell42 · · Score: 1

      And the US military answers with staged court martials because if they revealed how the pictures were doctored we would learn that the pictures of the Iraqi elections were done the same way =)

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    49. Re:You got it wrong by bXTr · · Score: 1

      For starters, Jews don't believe in a hell. In Scripture God lays out some foods that are healthy and others that are unhealthy. If we break that law, we are not going to the lakes of burning brimstone; your Christian religionist leaders invented that one.
      Actually, there is no *Christian* hell, either. That's entirely out of the heads of John Milton and/or Dante Alighieri. Satan's alive and well on planet Earth, or so I've been told.
      --
      It's a very dark ride.
    50. Re:You got it wrong by Tuross · · Score: 1

      And it would lead us back to the moon landing.

      --
      Matt
      1. Read Slashdot
      2. ???
      3. Profit
    51. Re:You got it wrong by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      The thing is, that the army knows that discipline can never be absolute, that's why they stress it. The also take for granted independent thinking, but that doesn't need to be stressed. It's like physically, they know soldiers will be required to walk and run for long distances with heavy burdens, so they train for that. However, they also know that soldiers will be required to sit around and do nothing for long stretches, but they don't feel as much need to train for that, since it comes more naturally.

    52. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you are a Jew, you are certainly welcome to not think there is a hell.

      Many Christians do not think there is a hell.

      But you are simply wrong if you are suggesting that orthodox Jews to not believe in a hell.

      No, not lakes of fire - though some did and do - but orthodox Jews do believe in an afterlife, and they do believe in a differentiation of destination based on how you lived your life.

      This was well established among Jews even 2000 years ago.

      Modern day orthodox Judaism is very hellenized.

    53. Re:You got it wrong by Maniakes · · Score: 1

      I came across this quote a while back, supposedly from a Russian military document:

      "One of the serious problems in planning against American doctrine that the Americans do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine."

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    54. Re:You got it wrong by HunterZ · · Score: 1

      It really, REALLY rubs me the wrong way when people claim that science has "proved" something, as anyone who is a scientist will tell you is not possible under the Scientific Method.

      --
      Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    55. Re:You got it wrong by Dravik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is NOT I repeat NOT a plausible defense to say you were just following orders. In every brief on the subject, starting with one in the first weeks of basic training, US solider is told he has a duty to follow all legal orders. He is told in the same brief that it is also his duty to disobey and prevent others from obeying an illegal order.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    56. Re:You got it wrong by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      And there we have the difference between the Army and the Marines! ;)

      He's right, though. It's one thing for the elite forces to recruit intelligent soldiers. It's another thing entirely when you look at the pool they recruit FROM. Orrin points it out better a couple lines above this, but in the military, almost all commanders want obedience over initiative and second-guessing. It IS the military, after all, the greatest bastion of assininity in the world.

    57. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless if the soldiers "just following orders" like the Nuremberg trial guys,

      I believe that the ruling wasn't applied to the soldiers, only the senior officers who had the power to stop it. The rationale was that the soldiers would have just been shot, or punished, and someone else would have been ordered to do it, but those who had control had the power to stop the killings.

    58. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Military runs with the rules set in opposition. And they do encourage the seizing of initiative, so long as the person is demonstratibly correct. "If you're not doing it better, you better be doing it 'right'."

      The fact that manuver warfare is based around the ability for the commander in the thick of it pounce immediately on what they senses as an opportunity without calling back for instruction on how to act is a complete refutation of his argument. Yes, the US military is more restrictive than a civilian life. But they use the cultural imporance of seizing opportunities as they present themselves as the foundation of how to wage a successful war. Notice how effective it has been against forces that depend on centralized control.

      Carlos Hathcock was an elite soldier, but he didn't have all the fancy patches. Same with Sgt York. And Hugh Thompson. And many others I could name, and thousands I couldn't. I could recount audacious plans, the new methods of fighting war, projecting power, spontanious combinations of different ideas, colorful American officers and storied units. But really, US military history is just LOUSY with them. You can't throw a rock without hitting brilliant examples of the people who define the ideals.

    59. Re:You got it wrong by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      Perhaps coincidentally, virtually all the unhealthy foods God mentions are all scientifically proven as unhealthy.
      How about a link to one of those "scientific proofs"?
    60. Re:You got it wrong by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      As to the rest of your load of shit, having been in the Army (1st SF) I can tell you we handed the heads to many other nations troops when training and running OPFOR.


      And I have heard several stories where soldiers from other militaries whipped the asses of US troops. Like when some Finnish troops went to Norway for some arctic-warfare training with American and Norwegian troops. As it turned out, only Finns and Norwegians did any actual combat-training. US troops just sat in their tents and tried to stay alive in the cold.

      Or how US Troops routinely rolled down the hills with their Bradleys (which were too heavy and clumsy for the mountain-roads) in Bosnia, and Finnish soldiers had to save their sorry asses with their smaller wheeled APC's.

      I have heard similar stories from German Bundeswehr, where the Germans were less than impressed by actions of US Army in joint exercises.

      Of course, there are the numerous cases where US Troops have distinguished themselves by killing friendly soldiers... They seem to be particularly good at this. They have now started to train the troops in Iraq to differentiate between friendly forces from the insurgents. British troops have loaned them personnel, equipment and British flags so they can learn the difference between British soldier and an insurgent.

      Yes, there are lots of fine soldiers in US Military. No, they are not some uber-soldiers that mop the floor with everyone else. Sure, overall the US Military is the strongest in the world (with all that money, it better be). But their individual soldiers are not really any better than soldiers in other militaries.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    61. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any of the nordic countries except the Swiss

      Yeah, damn those incompetent Swiss nordic countries!

      You don't know where Switzerland is on a map, or which the nordic countries are, do you?

    62. Re:You got it wrong by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      Jesus mentioned hell, but the word he used was the name of the ever smouldering rubbish tip outside the city walls. It's entirely possible to conclude that what he mean was that people found to be unrightious before the LORD are simply discarded and cease to be.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    63. Re:You got it wrong by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      Can someone explain to me why kangaroos aren't kosher? They're not mentioned one way or the other in Leviticus. Now even though the ancient Israelites hadn't heard of kangaroos, you'd think God would have (what with him being omniscient and all that) in which case it's odd that he didn't mention them. If you were cynical, you might conclude that it was all made up by some dude who'd caught a bit too much sun on the old bonce.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    64. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oi Vey! To say the least!

      The quick response is to STFW (search the fscking web), or STFU (shut the fsck up). The calmer answer is: kangaroos are not ruminants.

    65. Re:You got it wrong by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Modern day orthodox Judaism is very hellenized.

      Sad but true, orthodox Judaism is quite the wild tangent from the original faith in Yahweh.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    66. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really funny you should mention that. Actually more than half of the combat troups are religious (orthodox jews)

    67. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The quich respose in FOAD. The calmer answer is: neither are chickens.

    68. Re:You got it wrong by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 0

      Math is a natural science, and all us mathematicians do is prove stuff. Absolutely, apodictic truth is our goal, which I admit is not really possible with sciences based on empirical observation, but as my man Kurt Godel says, just this is the present situation doesn't mean science will be pursued in this manner in the future.

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    69. Re:You got it wrong by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 0

      That, my man, is what you call a "fig leaf" which pukes like Rumsfeld foist on the press when the troops are criticized for doing exactly as they are told. Their SOLDIERS, not lawyers, how the hell are they supposed to know what a lawful order is, when dozens of lawyers getting $400+/hour can't? Lets not be naive when discussing war and crime please.

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    70. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>However, they also know that soldiers will be required to sit around and do nothing for long stretches, but they don't feel as much need to train for that, since it comes more naturally.

      Which is why you hear stories of soldiers sitting around the Green Zone in Iraq, getting drunk because they don't quite know what else to do with their free time.

    71. Re:You got it wrong by cwspain · · Score: 1
      Goat-sandwiches are cool with God tho
      But not with cheese. Meat and dairy together is not kosher.
      --
      He who reflects on another man`s want of breeding, shows he wants it as much himself --Julius Caesar, per Plutarch
    72. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But chickens are birds, and as such are a different catagory.

      Or did you not read the whole pointless "vegitarian" arguement above us?

    73. Re:You got it wrong by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Actually, pigs are not healthy, even today. The American Cancer Society has linked the meat of pork to certain cancel developments due to the way pigs digest food; the food becomes part of the pigs flesh faster than virtually all mammals.

      Also, see this reply to my original post that describes some examples of why pigs would have been even worse to eat in biblical times. At least in modern day pigs are raised on farms and fed rather healthy food.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    74. Re:You got it wrong by srmalloy · · Score: 1
      The Military runs with the rules set in opposition. And they do encourage the seizing of initiative, so long as the person is demonstratibly correct. "If you're not doing it better, you better be doing it 'right'."

      That's not entirely true, either. Failing miserably while adhering strictly to established doctrine while a readily-identifiable but unorthodox solution existed is as unacceptable as getting too fast and loose with the rules. A lack of initiative will get you dumped on as hard as having too much.

    75. Re:You got it wrong by frankenbox · · Score: 1

      Lotsa me buddies in the good ol' US of A Army played D&D. Rather have them back me up than the drunks who hung out intil 2 am at the bars drinking green beer...... (;

    76. Re:You got it wrong by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Pigs will eat anything - which causes them to be used to consume human fecal matter in some societies without "modern" sanitation.

      By creating a food cycle where humans and pigs consume from each other, it sets up the dynamics for diseases - worms being the most obvious.

      In fairly recent times, scientists have figured out that influenza (flu) is a combination of human, duck, and pig DNA - because in Asia it is common for the three groups to live in close proximity and interact. The domesticated ducks carry the flu, and then spread it to migrating birds - then a year later, that new strain shows up around the world.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
    77. Re:You got it wrong by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Wow, I had no idea. Thanks for that information, very valuable the next time I'm arguing for kosher laws. :-)

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    78. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But not with cheese. Meat and dairy together is not kosher.
      Is it true that the reason is to stop people eating calves cooked in their mothers' milk? If so, am I the only one who fids the rule just a little bit broad in scope?
  34. Right by Erwos · · Score: 1

    "I'm thinking that a few generals should meet up with Jack Chick and have a good long discussion about the evils of role playing."

    Because, as you know, the _Jewish_ generals of the IDF really give a crap about what some psychotic _Christian_ thinks about D&D and religion.

    But, blah blah, cue the anti-Israel rants, however OT they may be.

    -DMZ

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    1. Re:Right by wk633 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The biggest supporters for the state of Isreal are radical Christians, who see it as a neccessary precursor to the rapture.

      Not that they'd neccessarily agree on much in one-on-one dialog :-)

    2. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But, blah blah, cue the anti-Israel rants, however OT they may be.

      Funny, haven't seen a single one. Sorry, you|they aren't a victim as much as you try to look like one. At least you didn't use the (usual) A-S word.....

    3. Re:Right by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
      Because, as you know, the _Jewish_ generals of the IDF really give a crap about what some psychotic _Christian_ thinks about D&D and religion.

      Not to mention that Chick is so anti-everything-that-isn't-fundimentalist-christia n that he just might try to kill the generals and get killed himself, by the generals.

      Hmm... maybe they should meet...

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    4. Re:Right by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The biggest supporters for the state of Isreal are radical Christians, who see it as a neccessary precursor to the rapture.
      I think the Jewish diaspora might be the biggest supporters. Dunno.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Never get between a slashdotter and his antichristian rant!

    6. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only anti israel rants will be because of the abuse of palestine and its peoples , not because the military have some odd ideas about people who play RPGs

    7. Re:Right by TalMaximus · · Score: 1

      This seems to me to be a bit off-topic but eh oh well.

      see it as a neccessary precursor to the rapture

      That wouldn't be the only reason. Biblical teachings illustrate how Israel is still God's chosen country because of the promises he made to Abraham. An illustration that exemplifies how Christians long for Israel to be treated can be seen in the Old Testament when David (annointed king-to-be) was being hunted down by Saul (king at the moment). Even though David had several opportunites to harm Saul, he did not raise his hand against Saul because Saul was still God's annointed. Basically its out of respect for God's annointing of the country that Chrisitians desire to minister to it and support it.

      That doesn't mean we don't care about the misgivings within Israel and that we don't try to remind them of the truths in Scripture, but we do not want to see our country raise its proverbial arm against God's annointed.

      1 Samuel 24:6
      He said to his men, "The LORD forbid that I should do such a thing to my master, the LORD's anointed, or lift my hand against him; for he is the anointed of the LORD ."

    8. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Bzzzt. Wrong.

      There is no precursor to the Rapture - the entire point is that no precondition is necessary, we could be taken and sadly, many of you left behind without a hope. If you know the truth and don't act on it before the Rapture, you have no chance.

      This is eternity, folks. You choose - smoking or non-smoking for eternity. You can accept the Lord Jesus Christ's free gift of salvation, He paid the price for my sin, your sin, everyone's sin. But only if you ACCEPT the gift can you RECEIVE the gift.

      Just pray, from your deepest heart, and cover these points:
      - admit you're a sinner
      - admit you cannot change that
      - accept the Lord Jesus Christ as your Saviour and Lord
      - accept His gift of salvation
      - ask forgiveness for the totality of sins you've committed
      - acknowledge that the Lord Jesus Christ died, was buried for three days, and rose again as proof of the resurrection.

      If you do that and REALLY mean it, you are saved. Some that call themselves Christians (Catholics, Mormons, Jehovah Witness) will tell you that is not sufficient. The Bible says otherwise. You need to pick - put your trust in humans (the pope, the mormon apostles and prophet, the watchtower); or put your trust in God.

    9. Re:Right by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1
      There is no precursor to the Rapture - the entire point is that no precondition is necessary, we could be taken and sadly, many of you left behind without a hope. If you know the truth and don't act on it before the Rapture, you have no chance.
      Uh, your "Bzzzt. Wrong." should not be directed at grandparent poster. He's not saying that he thinks the rapture has preconditions. He's saying that there are radical Christians who believe so, and that is a fact. You may be a radical Christian who does not believe so, but that still does not disprove his statement.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    10. Re:Right by wk633 · · Score: 1

      And while you're at it, don't forget to sign up all your friends to http://www.raptureletters.com/

      They'll thank you for it later. Really, they will.

    11. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bevets?

    12. Re:Right by Laser+Lou · · Score: 1
      The biggest supporters for the state of Isreal are radical Christians, who see it as a neccessary precursor to the rapture


      I guess some people confuse having a desire for the state of Israel to live in peace with this.

      --
      No data, no cry
    13. Re:Right by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I would hope, in a world as religously fractured and at times as intolerant as can be imagined, that a major super power would be supporting Israel for something other than religious reasons.

      Make no mistake, I support the existence of Israel, but as a non-Christian, I find this sort of theological motivation more than a little frightening.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    14. Re:Right by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Very well said. Good to hear some spiritual truth in the midst of all the atheism and worldy humanism posted on this site.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    15. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Nice to see that even the educated of our society are blantantly ignorant. Religion is the one true remaining evil in this world. Period.

    16. Re:Right by Hyperspac · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think the Jewish diaspora might be the biggest supporters. Dunno.

      Insightful but incorrect.

    17. Re:Right by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      I knew about that, but that doesn't mean the diaspora does not support Israel just as much. I guess you're right, though. Most Hebrews do not carry their pro-Israel views to being anti-Palestinian, while it seems that many fundamentalist Christians do so.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    18. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicely said, Mr. Stalin.

    19. Re:Right by Hyperspac · · Score: 0

      A lot of people do seem to be surprised to find that out thought. It wasn't that I was trying to discredit what you said, just that to often the people dismiss the actual for the obvious.

  35. In your hand, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "generally the only thing in my hand during D&D is soda and/or swiss cake rolls"

    What a beautiful metaphor for your penis.

  36. Don't overreact! by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

    The article says, "We have discovered that some of them are simply detached from reality," a security source told Ynetnews.

    Anyone who has played that game knows people who are in fact detached from reality. Of course, that's not everyone but they probably don't have time to do a bunch of research on every recruit to see if that person is safe or not for high security work.

    --
    Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
  37. X-Files said it perfectly by Chairboy · · Score: 1

    In Jose Chung's 'From Outer Space' (the episode with the smoking alien):

    Jose: Aren't you worried?
    Video Guy: I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.

  38. 73h by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 1

    Most soldiers who play Dungeons and Dragons simply do not admit to it while they are in teh [sic] army, he says.

    I wonder what they do to those who say "teh" in proper speech. : )

    --
    All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
    1. Re:73h by pklong · · Score: 1

      Well I don't know, but being the army they do have access to machine guns ;)

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

  39. Of course by wschalle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    A DnD player whose character is a chaotic good elf or some such would be averse to slaughtering palestinians and driving tanks over their homes, thus unsuitable for a leadership or "sensitive" position.

    Not sure why this belongs on slashdot...

  40. Only D&D? by ecalkin · · Score: 1

    What i found interesting was that they didn't talk about role playing games (RPGs), just D&D. The 'live-action' D&D may be what's spooking them.

    eric

  41. My favorite quote... by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

    "The army is not indifferent to the unique hobby and is trying to locate soldiers who in their free time dress up as witches and play in forests."

    roflmao

    --
    Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
  42. yuh-gi-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, they prefer to have the guys with the keys to the nukes play yuh-gi-oh instead.

  43. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by bluprint · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um...no. Dungeons and Dragons is the direct precursor to AD&D. It was played with pencil/paper just like AD&D, except with simpler rules, but basically the same. Further, most gamers generically say "D&D", even when really referring to "AD&D".

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
  44. D&D players are creative thinkers by CdXiminez · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since D&D players are above-average intelligence and creative thinkers, they probably make less obedient soldiers and might question orders and the purpose of military action. Also, they realize that the world doesn't have to be the way it is.

    1. Re:D&D players are creative thinkers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, and they're not the least prejudiced or inclined to make sweeping, evidence-free statements about people they disgree with, either. You know, people like soldiers and such.

      The bigotry of Leftist nerds is only surpassed by their blind ignorance...

    2. Re:D&D players are creative thinkers by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      "Leftist nerds"??? What the hell is that? Let me guess, everyone in your myopic worldview who doesn't adhere strictly to your beliefs and prejudices is a "Leftist". Is that right?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  45. I'd think they would want them... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It seems kind of strange. Back in my D&D days, most of the game in our groups was about combat. Lots of work on strategy, using the resources at hand, layout of the battlefield, etc, to keep your character alive and obtain your objective. Plenty of practice thinking like that is something I'd think would be desirable in a military recruit.

    Apparently I must be mentally unbalanced though, so don't trust my judgment on that one. I'm all detached from reality and stuff.

  46. ypu missed the point by geekoid · · Score: 1

    cause they would kill Jack Chick, and really, how is that a bad thing?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  47. Games Help to Think Unconventionally by Spencerian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fallacious thinking on behalf of Israel military people. I wonder if a county whose identity is rooted so strongly in a state-sponsored faith can see outside of the box as the United States has in accepting almost any religion, yet taking no direct preference in any one.

    (This isn't a jab at the Jewish faith at all. I'm about to join the Catholic faith myself, but the question is there, as I'll explain.)

    There are a few studies that show positives with game playing. At heart, a proper game based on reality or fantasy settings in an Earth-like setting is a simulation. Sims teach with low costs and reduce or eliminate the expenses needed in live training. Twitch games aid in dexterity and coordination, of course.

    And the US Army believes that a good sim of their work is also not only a fun game, but a great recruiting tool.

    While board games like D&D itself may not show an immediate dividend to fighting a war, consider that any game helps plot strategy, conserve resources, and deal consequence.

    Game playing may help a soldier think "outside of the box" in a combat situation where unusual solutions with conventional weapons and tactics may prove worthwhile. It seems that the Israeli Army may decide to stick to convention.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:Games Help to Think Unconventionally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be amazed how often being a soldier is not about 'thinking outside the box'. In addition, armies have dealt with a ton of sticky situations before and have guideline procedures for most of them.

    2. Re:Games Help to Think Unconventionally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > United States has in accepting almost any religion

      Please, oh please, can I come to the alternate reality you live in?

    3. Re:Games Help to Think Unconventionally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a lot of gay people too, right? Yeah right, right.

    4. Re:Games Help to Think Unconventionally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> United States has in accepting almost any religion

      >Please, oh please, can I come to the alternate reality you live in?

      You beat me to responding to this. My response was going to be simply:

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    5. Re:Games Help to Think Unconventionally by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Is Judaism the state-sponsered faith of Israel, or is Israel tha faith-sponsered state of Judaism?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    6. Re:Games Help to Think Unconventionally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >United States has in accepting almost any religion

      Please, oh please, can I come to the alternate reality you live in?
      Of course you may. Anyone is allowed to come to the United States.

      (ooh, recursive irony!)

  48. Other forms of reality detachment by wk633 · · Score: 1

    Wonder if they ask people if they read fiction or go to movies...

  49. Weird... by Jethro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this only shows one side of the story.

    They do ask you about your hobbies when you go through recruitment (at 16 years old). They may assume that people who play fantasy games are a 'security risk', but they definitely recognize that kids who play complex rule-based cooporative games in their teens /do/ have some valuable qualities, too.

    The Israeli army tends to know how to assign people to jobs they'd be good at. And use the rest for cannon fodder. Or, in my case, tell them to just stay home if it's all the same.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:Weird... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 1

      The Israeli army tends to know how to assign people to jobs they'd be good at.

      So what's the army's problem then? All they have to do is assign D&D players as executioners. It stands to reason that anyone who goes out and plays with a sword as a hobby will probably become pretty good at wielding it.

      --
      I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
    2. Re:Weird... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Good point, except that the Israeli army doesn't use /swords/ for executions.

      Actually, the Israeli army doesn't perform executions (assasinations, yes, but playing D&D doesn't make you a good helicopter pilot). The State of Israel only ever executed one person, and I believe he was hanged.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    3. Re:Weird... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 1

      How about longbow snipers, then? ;)

      --
      I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  50. The Israeli Army, If You'll Recall by autosentry · · Score: 1

    . . . Gave us the UZI! A fabulously ineffective weapon crucial to the Shadowrun RPG and various bad action movies. Who's to say who's in touch with reality?

    --
    Monster Zero is the reason we cannot live on the surface, but must live forever live underground like this.
    1. Re:The Israeli Army, If You'll Recall by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
      What do you mean the UZI was crucial to Shadowrun? In all my games the players used Ingram Smartguns (which were based off of the MAC-10).

      As it is, once Die Hard came around, everybody in those bad action movies started using the MP5 anyway.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    2. Re:The Israeli Army, If You'll Recall by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Gave us the UZI! A fabulously ineffective weapon...

      Maybe ineffective in the hands of the gangsta hood down the street but let's not forget they were a very well circulated weapon during the six day war not to mention they're still used in many areas of professional security today.

      Granted, it's not a MP5 but I'd still like to own one. It's better than my SWD M11/9.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  51. Data Point by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    I was in the US Army.

    TS/SBI. Airborne. Served in the Balkins.

    Played D&D as a teen. Recently started playing again.

    Honorably discharged. Never created a security risk.

    For whatever that's worth.

    -Peter

    1. Re:Data Point by Mindjiver · · Score: 1

      Where in the D&D universe is the Balkins?

      --
      I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
    2. Re:Data Point by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware there was a "the D&D universe".

      Anyway, I was in the the Balkins, not a character I played.

      -Peter

    3. Re:Data Point by rickbrodie · · Score: 1
      Served in the Balkins
      With such poor spelling, they probably didn't see you as much of a risk :)
    4. Re:Data Point by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Funny

      I never have gotten the hang of vowels.

      I should have been born an ancient Hebrew.

      -Peter

    5. Re:Data Point by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Oh, I get it, I misspelled Balkans. Ha! You pointed out my spelling mistake. LOL! Where's a mod when you need one!

      -Peter

  52. That's Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had to pretend I was gay to get kicked out of the military. I'd much rather have just played a board game.

  53. Frowning on D&D by [cx] · · Score: 1

    Imagine what they think of World of Warcraft!

    A side note about the D&D, it would be funny if they went out on patrols roleplaying a rogue and a mage.

    "Gadzooks, Gremai, it looks like we stumbled upon some low level Palestinian Knights."

    1. Re:Frowning on D&D by darthv506 · · Score: 1

      I don't think generals would put up with the long waits in Queue that have been plaguing most servers since the last "emergency patch" 2 weeks ago ;)

  54. detached from reality? by Didjeridoo · · Score: 1

    I think my lightning bolts disagree! Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt!

  55. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    WoTC started calling both 3rd/3.5 editons just Dungeons and Dragons.

  56. Next TV Watchers, Book readers, /.ers by rcastro0 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why does the IDF believe the game is so dangerous?
    "These people have a tendency to be influenced by external factors which could cloud their judgment, a military official says. They may be detached from reality(...)


    You watching TV ? What is that, holly-fricking-wood liberals ? You outa here ! What book is that, son ? So you say its fiction, like it only exists in your head ? I see. You have been promoted to toillet cleaner, second class. Slashwhat? Look at me! Im talking to you. Stop typing and stand up right away! What do you think you are doing, writing, reading and being influenced by these international techno-babble freaks ?

    --
    Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
  57. Re:Uzi 9mm by markdowling · · Score: 1

    Terminator T-101 picked one, good enough for me :)

  58. Detached from Reality and Susceptible to Influence by windowpain · · Score: 1

    So I guess the IDF must take those renaissance faire people and ride them out of their recruiting offices on a rail!

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
  59. Hah! by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From TFA:

    Ynetnews has learned that 18-year-olds who tell recruiters they play the popular fantasy game are automatically given low security clearance.

    "They're detached from reality and suscepitble to influence," the army says.


    So, if you're "detached from reality," or as some people call it, "creative," you're subject to "influence"? So no Israeli soldier has an original thought, ever?

    No wonder the country is in such a fucked up situation...

    1. Re:Hah! by Have+Blue · · Score: 0, Troll

      Frontline grunts aren't supposed to have original thoughts- they're supposed to follow orders and perform their assigned functions. Original thought is for officers and politicians.

    2. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have Blue
      Original thought is for officers and politicians

      what? what kind of politicians have you got?

  60. In the USA by wk633 · · Score: 1

    Soldiers have to lie about being gay.

  61. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by SmokeHalo · · Score: 1

    From TFA:
    The game focuses on the results of decisions made by the players as determined by the roll of the dice. In a more "active" version of the game, players leave the table and go out, dressed as the characters they assume for the game

    In the beginning, there was D&D. Then came AD&D. The roots of the game are entirely dice- and paper-oriented. (Plus they have those cute little miniatures, which make great projectiles when you're mad at someone.)

    --
    I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  62. HOLY DRAFT DODGING, BATMAN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the days of John Wayne and Sylvester Stallone, you had to go to Canada or Mexico to dodge the draft. Or enter college.

    Now, you just have to play Baldur's Gate and Temple of Elemental Evil.

    That is bitchin' sweeeeeet! I'm totally not going to Iraq, now. Sign me up for some barracks gang bangs, and I'll do my duty and call it an excellent experience. Go Army!! Yut Yut!

    1. Re:HOLY DRAFT DODGING, BATMAN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It just said that they don't put them sensitive areas. It means they put them on the front line.

  63. The head of the IDF then said... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny
    "snif... snif... NERDS!"

    before he hefted a beer keg over his head while all his frends chanted "ogre, ogre, ogre".

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  64. *did* succeed in making D&D look bad by HBI · · Score: 1

    They forced the removal of the demons and devils (re-naming, actually, but same difference) and a few other alterations.

    Chick was distributing these little tracts back in the 1980s too. I saw my copy back in 1987 or so. Hilarious. Seeing it on the web brought back memories.

    I threw it out then. I still have my 1ed AD&D stuff, tho. With the demons and devils.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:*did* succeed in making D&D look bad by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      Chick is a lunatic, pure and simple. He does have hsi following among the Gawd-addicts out there, though. The Fundementalists have long hated roleplaying. I grew up in a Jehovah's Witness family, and my brother, my best friend and I all got into gaming. We didn't do any D&D, mainly because we thought the rules really sucked, but did play Twilight 2000, which was a post-WWIII military game. No magic, no monsters, just moving around a bombed-out Eastern Europe and stealing tanks and shooting enemy soldiers.

      Any rate, we got a stern talking to, and when we tried to defend ourselves by saying that we weren't playing D&D, they just couldn't or wouldn't understand. If it involved anything other than six-sided dice, it must be the Devil's work. Me and my brother both high-tailed it out of that sect in the end, which in my opinion has produced more nuts than any roleplaying game ever will. My best friend stayed on and gave up the hobby. I still roleplay, particularly Rifts (even though the system sucks), and my character is battling demons and godlings, casting spells and drawing pentagrams, and I don't care. No worse than reading a fantasy novel.

      It's not like I actually believe any of it, and anyone who starts to think what they're playing is real was probably wonky long before.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:*did* succeed in making D&D look bad by mark-t · · Score: 1
      I'm a Christian.

      I even consider myself to be a fundamentalist Christian.

      However, I also happen to love playing D&D... I have ever since I was first introduced to the game when I was in high school, over 20 years ago now.

      In that time, I have never once seen anyone "flip out" over the game, or think they could "cast a real spell", or in any other way start to diffuse reality and fantasy that Chick seems to believe is a natural consequence of playing the game. I don't doubt this has happened, personally, but I think it's the exception and not the rule.

      Chick is an example of an overreactionary person that misrepresents the rest of us that certainly don't wish to compromise our beliefs, but don't want to simply cut ourselves off from the rest of the world in the process. D&D is fun, and as harmless as, for example, reading a good book, going to a movie, or perhaps more appropriately, little children playing "cops and robbers". D&D is ultimately only a slightly more organized method of playing "let's pretend", and adults have no less of a need to be able to get away from the real world and fantasize a little bit than children do.

      Chick may well believe I'm going to hell because I play D&D, but the reality is he doesn't control my destiny, and fortunately for me, he never will.

    3. Re:*did* succeed in making D&D look bad by lgw · · Score: 1

      I can still remember having a D&D convention in a church, just to mollify the parents, at the height of the hysteria. What strange days those were.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:*did* succeed in making D&D look bad by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      nooooo they didn't. 3rd edition has them all listed by class: Demons Balors Quasits Devils Pit Fiends Imps etc. There's even a nice little blurb describing the nine circles of the Inferno and the Abyss, too -- for those poor dumb DMs who run characters powerful enough to conquer Hell.

  65. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by bluprint · · Score: 1

    Didn't know that, thanks. It's been a while for me, but I remember when "Advanced D&D" was just another book in the D&D rules set. Then D&D was dropped, and it was all called AD&D (2nd edition?). I haven't played since the change you mention happened.

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
  66. The IDF's personnel problems by Animats · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The IDF has some major internal problems right now. The leftist solders don't want to go into Palestinian refugee camps. The rightist soldiers don't want to go into illegal Jewish settlements. Those factional problems are bigger than the D&D issue.

    1. Re:The IDF's personnel problems by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      The IDF has some major internal problems right now. The leftist solders don't want to go into Palestinian refugee camps. The rightist soldiers don't want to go into illegal Jewish settlements. Those factional problems are bigger than the D&D issue.

      So now is the perfect opportunity to find some scapegoat.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:The IDF's personnel problems by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

      That's easy to solve. Make a contingent of leftist soldiers and a contingent of rightist solders and keep them both separate in place or time. Just a logistic problem...

      --
      There you are, staring at me again.
  67. Re:I think I've ascertained who you are. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what am I?

    Rubber?

  68. Israeli D&D by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 0, Troll

    DM:"This is the evil wizard's castle".
    Player:"No it isn't, G-d promised it to us 5000 years ago. It's our castle and he's a terrorist".

    All players start off with 13 billion GP a year.

    --
    Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
  69. Role playing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And what makes you think that playing role playing games is NOT a sign of a weak personality? Are you an expert on the human mind or what?

    As far as I can see, role playing essentially consists of creating an alter ago for yourself and acting out. Why would anyone do that unless they were unhappy with their real personality and also deeply unable to cope with the reality (with the opposite sex, in particular)? To me that spells a weak personality.

    1. Re:Role playing by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And yet every actor and actress roleplays. Many authors roleplay, at least acting out what happens in their novels in their mind. In theory, elected representatives should roleplay in considering how a given piece of legislature will affect various different constituents.

      Roleplaying is a normal everyday occurrence, its part of learning about anyone who isn't yourself or any job you don't currently do (like the Model United Nations groups in High School).

      The only difference here is that these people wield maces and fireballs in their fantasy world instead of bayonets and bazookas. I have to wonder if these people had chosen to play an Avalon Hill wargame, if they'd have been given higher clearances.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:Role playing by PhotoJim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Children role play constantly and have a ton of fun doing it. I doubt many children are unhappy with their personality (that seems a predominantly adult trait). As for their ability to cope with reality, perhaps they don't to an adult level but they certainly do. (Children are being abducted to act as soldiers for the armed resistance occurring in Uganda, and they cope as well as can be expected with it.) That an adult would seek escape occasionally seems entirely natural to me. I suppose all women who read Harlequin romances are weak, unhappy people by your reckoning.

    3. Re:Role playing by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      Everyone who writes fiction about people, I would add to that list. Damn weak-personalitied losers, the lot of them.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    4. Re:Role playing by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      I suppose all women who read Harlequin romances are weak, unhappy people by your reckoning.


      Now that you mention it, yes!
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    5. Re:Role playing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, my and my wife role-play all the time, does that make us less security concious? I think not!!

      Honey, do you want to be the dog or the fire-hydrant tonight?

  70. Prestige Class by roberto0 · · Score: 1

    Actually, Suicide Bomber is a Prestige Class you can earn at any level. The main requirements are a very low WIS and 5 ranks in Disguise and Concealment.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, simulate.
  71. Bad translation! by ohad_l · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IDF is only specifically concerned with RD&D players - that is LARPers. By the way, their specific claim is that they are detached from reality... however, in Atuda - an IDF project that allows one to delay his recruitment and get a scollarship to complete a degree before being drafted - one of the popular majors is mathematics. :)

    --
    If it weren't for fog, the world would run at a really crappy framerate.
  72. Does World of Warcraft count? City of Heroes? by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    ...and any other possible computer game with roleplaying elements. Dungeon Siege? Jesus. There are some big sellers here. If, statistically speaking, they wish to include the dumb-jock element (who tend to love watching and playing sports and loathe anything remotely resembling an RPG, or even a computer, for that matter) and disenfranchise the smart-creative-gamer element (who tend to not be a huge fan of sports and love imaginative gaming stuff), be my guest. I would just love to see who is the more innovative problem-solver in battle if all they have are people who only know how to brute-force a problem.

    1. Re:Does World of Warcraft count? City of Heroes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, none of that counts. D & D is the only RPG... You're such a nerd...

  73. SCA, not D&D by J.R.+Random · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've never seen D&D players do the "dress up with shields and swords" thing. Those pictures look like they're of a meeting of the Society for Creative Anachronism, or some other group of similar ilk. But four nerds sitting at a table with dice and paper maps wouldn't be so photogenic.

    1. Re:SCA, not D&D by Ioldanach · · Score: 2, Informative
      Those pictures look like they're of a meeting of the Society for Creative Anachronism, or some other group of similar ilk

      They don't look like the SCA, actually. The armor requirements in SCA are fairly strict, and they shouldn't be playing without head protection. The morning star in one picture is not SCA-legal, as it is an entangling weapon. The weapons pictured appear to be of the foam-covered type, which the SCA does use in its youth combat program, however as I said, other factors preclude this. (Adult combat uses rattan, a spongy type of wood also seen in some furniture.)

      Since they name D&D regularly in the article, the players probably referred to themselves that way, though they're actually doing a LARP variant of D&D.

    2. Re:SCA, not D&D by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      They are LARPERS not SCA. I'm the senischal of the Shire of Beit Aryeh (the SCA group that covers Israel) and I've never seen any of those people before. The sca in Israel is quite new and pretty small (about 15-25 people) but Role playing games both larp and table top are quite popular in Israel.

      I belive larpers are generally warned before they get their draft notice to down play the fact that they are gamers before they go in.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
  74. Typically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you start all characters a about level 3. Then get them a little work out doing some minor animal cruelty, and by the time they've talked themselves through a few checkpoints, or climed a few fences (overcoming an obstical counts even if you don't kill it), level 4 is pretty reasonable.

  75. With apologies to the Dead Alewives by Chagatai · · Score: 1
    "Galstaff. You are in a small room. The dark stench of mildew eminates from the prison walls."

    I cast magic missile.

    [Rolls dice]

    "A suicide bomber inflicts major damage to you, draining you of 10HP. You are dead."

    How could that happen? I had Mordechai's Magical Watchdog.

    "No, you didn't. You had a 15 year-old basset hound with three legs and a severe case of diahhrea. The suicide bomber took you out with a Pipe Bomb of Hurting +2. You are dead."

    [sob]... where are the Cheetos?

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:With apologies to the Dead Alewives by johndiii · · Score: 1

      The IDF probably doesn't want people who attack the darkness. :-)

      --
      Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
  76. D&D People do not play well with normal people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's all face the facts here. People who are into roleplaying and stuff like D&D are not to be concidered as "normal" people. They are weird. They are often fat. They look funny. THEY SMELL! Putting these crazy anti social people together will regular human beings is a bad idea, especially in a millitary scenario.

  77. Profiling on the wrong level. by krypt0s · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I take serious issue with the blanket classification being applied in this case. What it appears they have missed is that within almost all gaming communities, more than one archetype of players exists. Players almost always fall into the "power gamer" or "casual gamer" category.

    The people I think they are attempting to target are the casual gamers. These are the people who obsess over what color their character's eyes are, what they're wearing, etc. If that's what makes them happy, then more power to them. However, if the Israeli military feels this type of person is less attached to reality and thus a liability, then I could see a justification in the actions they have taken.

    Power gamers, on the other hand, are concerned with winning. That is what drives them. They don't care if their "character" is represented by a detailed miniature, or a piece of pocket lint. Making optimal decisions and maximizing their chances of success are key. I would think the military would want to target these people for recruitment. Instead, they are being lumped together under the same label as the casual gamers.

    I suppose I take issue with the actions themselves being singled out and not the motivations behind the people taking the actions.

    --
    This is not the sig you're looking for.
  78. What about movies, books, and any fiction? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    They're detached from reality and suscepitble to influence

    I wonder if they give low security clearance to kids who like movies, books, or any other kind of fiction? Consuming those involves being "detached from reality." What about actors? What about intelligence analysts who pose "what if" questions about their enemy's actions?

  79. It wasn't a problem in is US Army in the 80's by eaddict · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was in a combat engineering group (ariborne!), had secret clearance, and was in charge of many men and equipment. My squad would often play D&D or other RPGs during down time. I think it helped us to think outside the box and come up with unique solutions to the problems presented to us during military exercises. In fact, it got so the whole platoon used to play Squad Leader (and other board games) along with my squad.

    I think it has to do more with being creative and maybe anti-establishment. My squad (and I) would often ruffle brass when we did something that worked and worked well BUT wasn't by the book.

    Oh well, that was 20 years ago. Now the US Army just wants bodies...

    --
    "If you are on fire you can just stop, drop, and roll. If you fall into Lava you are just dead." - my 5yr old daughter
    1. Re:It wasn't a problem in is US Army in the 80's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My squad would often play D&D or other RPGs during down time.

      I hear they are having a hard time with RPGs in Iraq. Especially RPG-7.

    2. Re:It wasn't a problem in is US Army in the 80's by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh well, that was 20 years ago. Now the US Army just wants bodies...

      No, they still want motivated and intelligent volunteers. This is the IDF we're talking about, not the US Army. The last time the Army thought they could save money by sending idiots into battle with full-auto weapons, we lost a war.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    3. Re:It wasn't a problem in is US Army in the 80's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We haven't lost; the President told us "Mission accomplished".

    4. Re:It wasn't a problem in is US Army in the 80's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      We haven't lost; the President told us "Mission accomplished".

      He was talking about Vietnam. You know during a draft when any man who had all his limbs and could be shown which end the bullet came out was considered "military material". With a volunetary military you can at least reject the real idiots.

    5. Re:It wasn't a problem in is US Army in the 80's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it helped us to think outside the box

      In Israel, the box thinks outside of us.

  80. gg by aleatory_story · · Score: 1

    "Lightning Bolt! Lightning Bolt! Sleep!!!" You don't want him in the military?

    --
    Whatever you may be sure of, be sure of this: that you are dreadfully like other people. - James Russell Lowell
  81. Don't Ask Don't Tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long is it until D&D players start lobbying for a don't ask don't tell policy like the US has on homosexuals?

  82. Whats next, Star Trek fans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure long time fans of the Star Trek franchise are on their radar now. Especially after Trekkies and Trekkies 2.

  83. Too idealistic for military life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, that's the party line and, I admit, it's true to some extent.

    What the US military has done is simply to extend the boundaries of the box whereas the personality traits of a D&D (or any other role) player accepts no limits. Most role players and geeks in general are just way too idealistic for military life.

    1. Re:Too idealistic for military life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Offers training that develops it. Duh. There are at least two dudes who got their legs blown off who fought like hell to go back to their friends in Iraq. One of whom on completion of a close quarters combat course to the guy from the media, he's not worried about another landmine, it only be half as bad next time.

      Seriously, losing a leg, then deciding to take a close quarters combat course and return to the war zone is a pretty non-linear solution.

      What's amazing is that the US has a military tradition of out of the box thinking that goes back to War of Independance. We have our failings to be sure, but a lack creative military solutions has NEVER been one of them.

    2. Re:Too idealistic for military life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's amazing is that the US has a military tradition of out of the box thinking that goes back to War of Independance. We have our failings to be sure, but a lack creative military solutions has NEVER been one of them.

      Uh... "creative military solutions" are generally called "terrorism" i.e. "thinking outside the box", not playing by the other guy's rules, etc.

    3. Re:Too idealistic for military life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorism isn't a military solution to anything. It's political.

      And it has it's failings. For instance it's predicated on the assumption that those being attacked by terrorists are unwilling to be more unreasonable than the terrorists. Which at some point won't be true. Whitness the campaign of genocide waged against Native Americans. If you think people have changed a lot in the past century and a half, you're wrong.

      But you're right in that most of them are considered poor sportsmanship until they become standard practice.

    4. Re:Too idealistic for military life by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 2, Insightful

      News flash, the indians were fighting the Americans as well. It wasn't totally one sided, but the tech gap and population gap eventually made sure that the Americans finished on top of the heathen savages.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    5. Re:Too idealistic for military life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the British started it, the Americans finished it, and at the end, it was completely one side, and brutal far past any concept of justice, reason, or decency. That said, I live (quite comfortably) in that wake. In Seattle no less. Good for me, bad for them, I'm just glad some of the culture has managed to survive into the present day.

      But the point remains, a society's reason has it's limits, and the war with the nations of native americans wasn't even about survival of the nation. And the Islamists inability to understand the disconnect between our ability and unwillingness to dig out the black hats is something of a fatal flaw. Cleaning up radioactive dust might even be a low skill high paying job that a lot of people would find attractive.

    6. Re:Too idealistic for military life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I still read Slashdot at 0. Comments like yours.

      Bin Laden and his buddies wanted US influence out of Saudi Arabia, so he blew up our two biggest buildings and killed a few thousand innocent Americans.

      We responded (against the objections of many who saw it as a totally "black hat" move) by flat-out conquering two entire nations (so far) which were friendly to Bin Ladin's cause.

      In the wake of it, we are rebuilding both countries as democracies, and are saber-rattling about a couple others in the region.

      Because of the attack on 9/11, our influence in the Middle East has expanded, rather than declined. It had the exact opposite effect of what was intended. It was a fatal miscalculation.

      Think of it, if Bin Laden simply had King Saud and a few other Saudi royals assassinated on that September morning, would Americans have given a shit? Maybe a little, but not enough to go to war over it. Then the remaining (anti-American) members of the royal family would have taken over, and we would have been shown the door. A solid victory.

      One can only conclude that the reality is one of two possibilities:

      1. Bin Ladin simply didn't know any better, and grossly misunderstood how America would react.

      or

      2. Bin Ladin is not actually interested in removing Western influence from Saudi Arabia, because he derives his political power from being in a state of perpetual war with the greatest superpower on Earth. Take western influence out of the Middle East, and he doesn't get to play warlord anymore.

    7. Re:Too idealistic for military life by Aexia · · Score: 1

      We responded (against the objections of many who saw it as a totally "black hat" move) by flat-out conquering two entire nations (so far) which were friendly to Bin Ladin's cause.

      Iraq wasn't friendly to Bin Laden's cause. Saddam was a secularist that Bin Laden wanted to see removed. Saddam cracked down hard on fundamentalists. They were the people he gassed.

      Because of the attack on 9/11, our influence in the Middle East has expanded, rather than declined. It had the exact opposite effect of what was intended. It was a fatal miscalculation.

      You're joking right? America/Bush has acted exactly how OBL wanted us to. America is hated by the entire Muslim world now. Half our army is bogged down in Iraq. Afghanistan is ruled by druglords. Iraq will be controlled by Islamic fundamentalists in a couple years. And Bin Laden himself still roams freely.

      Explain the "fatal miscalculation".

    8. Re:Too idealistic for military life by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      Quite right. Today's creative military solutions involve shooting civilians while rocking out to death metal music piped in from the nearest tank. It's a creative approach to reducing levels of combat related stress by making GI's think they're playing a shoot 'em up.

      Genius.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    9. Re:Too idealistic for military life by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      or

      3) Bin laden is playing alonger term game where he counted on a violent reaction that would prove to moderate muslims that yes, America really IS the great satan. He believes that eventually his brand of radical militant fundamentalism will grow in strength to the point that America is forced to withdraw from the middle east. After all, it worked in Vietnam.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    10. Re:Too idealistic for military life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could always go back to exterminating them wholesale and raping the women who survive. Or just completely obliterate their cities from afar and get back on with our lives.

    11. Re:Too idealistic for military life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardly, an ideal solution. A massive chunk of Vietnam's population died waiting for the American people, who never understood the war, to put a stop to it.

      I'm guessing you're what... 15. Try cracking a book some time.

  84. That's not D&D, it's the SCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    D&D players sit around a table and roll dice, and write information on forms.

    SCA members get dressed up in medieval clothing and have feasts, do battle in armor, brew beer and wine, do nice calligraphy & illumination, and so on. Basically, they re-enact life in medieval times, omitting plagues and other hardships.

    1. Re:That's not D&D, it's the SCA by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      SCA members get dressed up in medieval clothing and have feasts, do battle in armor, brew beer and wine, do nice calligraphy & illumination, and so on. Basically, they re-enact life in medieval times, omitting plagues and other hardships.

      And virtually anything else that resembles reality in Medieval society.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:That's not D&D, it's the SCA by dclydew · · Score: 1

      Yep, thats why they aren't a true Historical "Reenactment" Society, but an Historical Recreation Society.

      The swords and fights and brewing and leather and all that other stuff is the trappings around a 30some year old cult to the ideals of Chivalric Honor and Courtly Love. It's a 30some year old hippie fest, where many people value honor and their word over anything else. It a great big game with 13,000 total strangers that would be more than happy to pick up a weapon and play at my side.

      It's a 30some year old Cult to Dionysus and if you don't believe me... come to Pennsic and hang out near the lake. If Vlad's isn't a Dionysian Ritual, then I'll eat lutefisk.

      Ratatosk, Squirrel of Discord
      Chatterer of the Words of Eris
      Muncher of the ChaoAcorn
      POEE of The Great Googlie Mooglie Cabal

      AKA
      Lord Lewys ap Deykin,
      Warder of The Marche of Tirnewydd
      Rapier Champion of the Barony of the Middle Marches

      --
      Get a life, not a lifestyle. - Hikem Bey
    3. Re:That's not D&D, it's the SCA by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "..where many people value honor and their word over anything else."
      HAHAHAH...noooo
      they value the ability of the kiss ass more then anything else.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  85. Dungeons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I don't think the ban is against fantasy role playing...just that far too many Israelis childhood memories of dungeons were about real dungeons, and real dragons.

    Into anonymous coward mode I go.

  86. Did Jonathon Pollard play D&D? by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 1

    Just think, if he did, these kind of measures could have stopped lots of American secrets going to the USSR.

    --
    Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
  87. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Informative

    I you want the rules, minus the character creation and some of the names of the items/spells/creatures, you can go to http://opengamingfoundation.org/ and download the 3.5 Edition SRD for no charge.

  88. Worse than Don't Ask Don't Tell by sahonen · · Score: 1

    Not allowed in the army because you have an imagination? I guess they just want a bunch of unthinking drones to fill the ranks. I'm glad I'm not going to be in the Israeli army any time soon.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  89. Stands to reason.... by Himring · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sometimes common sense, like, works and stuff. After 9/11 the Israelies were telling the U.S. that it was nuts to body search 80 year old, white caucasian grandmas from Chicago and allow the 6-foot muslim to walk on by in airports. Which one, really, is more likely to be a terrorist?

    Howard Hughes and the CIA only hired Mormons for the longest as they had proven to have the highest, personal, integrity.

    And if you're concerned about someone trying to "see what they shouldn't see" then don't hire an AD&D player (D&D? -- that's what was out before AD&D when I was a kid) or a slashdotter.

    This stuff ain't rocket science folks....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:Stands to reason.... by Trespass · · Score: 1

      'Common sense' can get you killed.

      1.) I don't think Howard Hughes and the CIA knew enough Mormons, nor do I think either has a good track record for sane decisions.

      2.) Which is more likely to get tricked into carrying a bomb onto a plane?

    2. Re:Stands to reason.... by bstadil · · Score: 1
      Howard Hughes and the CIA only hired Mormons for the longest as they had proven to have the highest, personal, integrity.

      They must have fallen off the wagon since then. H^H SCO / Canopy

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
  90. Maybe They Don't Want Them Suspetible to by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    female foreigners. Cheap joke, but I had to go for it.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  91. Scott Kurtz's take on JTC by SendBot · · Score: 1

    Scott Kurtz (creator of PVP comics) made a very funny comic in 2000 as a rebuttal to JTC's comic. His writeup is worth reading, but if you're in a hurry or just not in the mood just scroll down for the comic.

    http://www.pvponline.com/rants_jesus.php3

  92. You pompous ass! by rafael_es_son · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And who do you think occupational and clinical psychologists respond to, you pompous ass? I weep at popular idolization of state-sanctioned authority.

    --
    HAD
  93. What they really mean is too strong a personality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The military mortification process will not work on people who have an internal escape mechanism of the strength of that which is created by D&D players. Mortification is the process the military uses to breakdown ones personality and remodel it into their hierarchical command based model. This is done in boot camp to make nice obedient soldiers. People they can not remodel are risky to them. There is good and bad in this. Those who are most apt to resist the process are equally divided among the most talented and most pathetic people in the world. The psychological tests seeks to reveal which type these people our and track them accordingly. The sad reality is that for the most part the military wants psychologically malleable people. While they will make exceptions for the brains in the DD groups they most certainly do not want the people who use the game to escape reality as they can not remodel them so they cannot trust them and the reason they like to play the game means they are more vulnerable to manipulation.

  94. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by cybergrue · · Score: 1
    AD&D no longer exists.
    A few years back, Wizards of the Coast (who bought out TSR, and were then bought out by Hasbro) released a new version of the rules. At the same time, they reverted the system to the old name; Dungeons and Dragons (D&D). Version numbers are now added to the name, so it became D&D3e, for the 3rd editition of the rules. As they released an 'update' to the rules just over a year ago, the most up to date version is called D&D3.5

    A short history of D&D can be found here

    And the official home page for D&D can be found here

  95. Actually.. by Eesh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, in one of my pre-recruitment interviews I told the interviewer that I read Slashdot and he was enthusiastic because he did too. :) That was an interview by technical people for a technical job, though, not the generic screening interviews that all Israeli teenagers do. (Recruitment is mandatory in Israel)

    However, it should be noted that this was news to me, as I know quite a few people who played or still play D&D and other RPGs (I did, too) and served in highly classified jobs (Like myself).

    Also, a prominent Israeli portal posted this caricature about the issue.

    The guy on the dragon is saying (Very loosely translated) "I won't go anywhere but Golani", which is an elite unit.

    And for the Slashdot crowd, the artist (Miki Mottes) was once the Sysop of a major Israeli BBS.

    1. Re:Actually.. by SkinnyPapa · · Score: 1

      In my "generic screening interview" a few months ago, I told the interviewer I read Slashdot and play CS. Luckily, so did he. But they won't let my intrests and my CS skills (not Counter-Strike this time, but Computer Science) stop them from recruiting me to the infantry...

    2. Re:Actually.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Golani? Elite? You must be one of those disconnected D&D players, right? :-)

    3. Re:Actually.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elite... I had a friend in High School (Engineering school of Tel Aviv university) who dropped out of academic reserve and joined Golani. Elitism is in the eye of the beholder.

  96. And this is news? by William_Lee · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ehrm...And who exactly doesn't frown on D&D, other than sadistic DMs and the dicerollers who love them?

    Elmar, a level 12 half elf thief walks into a college party:

    Rolling 20 sided die, possible outcomes:

    1-15 Every girl there that happens to notice Elmar laughs and shakes their head sadly - Charisma -3

    16-18 Other partygoers dump beer on nerd taunting him unmercifully - Defense -3

    19 Jocks perform +5 super atomic wedgie on Elmar grievously injuring him

    20 It is dark in the closet you are locked in. You are likely to be eaten by a GRUE.

  97. Is Jack Chick gonna get /.'ed? by ZephyrQ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Imagine the irony!

    Call it the --Revenge of the Geeks--!

    Right now, I'm sure they are freaking out...

    1. Re:Is Jack Chick gonna get /.'ed? by zombiestomper · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just think of all the souls he'll save BEFORE the slashdot effect kicks in.

      Aside from that, Black Leaf in the Chick tract is a hottie and Elfstar/Debbie should be played by Uma in Dark Dungeons: The Movie.

    2. Re:Is Jack Chick gonna get /.'ed? by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 2, Funny

      Best not annoy him too much, or he'll publish a tract about how Slashdot is the work of the Devil.

      I wonder if he has an opinion on the BSD Daemon?

      -Stephen

    3. Re:Is Jack Chick gonna get /.'ed? by Sux2BU · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who clicked on the link just to /. him?

    4. Re:Is Jack Chick gonna get /.'ed? by Ghostx13 · · Score: 1

      Not that anyone doesn't know this already, but I'm pretty sure Jack Chick is Satan.

    5. Re:Is Jack Chick gonna get /.'ed? by ZephyrQ · · Score: 1

      Nope, not satan...

      Just a Tool....

    6. Re:Is Jack Chick gonna get /.'ed? by Digz · · Score: 1
      Meet Jack Chick

      Just in case you wanted to know what he looked like.

      --
      SYS 64738
    7. Re:Is Jack Chick gonna get /.'ed? by Digz · · Score: 1
      ..and this time I'll fix the URL.. :)

      Meet Jack Chick

      --
      SYS 64738
    8. Re:Is Jack Chick gonna get /.'ed? by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      No. How many times did you push F5? Ooooh, all those large graphic files... slower than hell... his server's suffering ^_^

  98. Sweeping Generalizations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oohh... I want to play too.

    You know every person I've ever seen who posts messages that say they think D&D players are weird has been an idiot (and a bad speller too...)

    Then again... I've only seen one!

  99. Obligatory Spacemoose references by n1ywb · · Score: 1
    SSSS SSSS I'm a SEA SERPENT!

    And in honor of the MAGNIFICENT Jack Chick: The Antlers of the Damned!

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
    1. Re:Obligatory Spacemoose references by n1ywb · · Score: 1

      I repeat, in honor of the MAGNIFICENT Jack Chick: The Antlers of the Damned!

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
  100. Gotta love the editorial comments... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

    I especially enjoyed the pictures of D&D players with swords, as generally the only thing in my hand during D&D is soda and/or swiss cake rolls.

    Yes, and that is why you are fat sitting at home and these guys are joining the IDF and killing people.

  101. Jonathon Pollard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean: going to Israel, then being traded by the Israelis to the Russians.
    Pollard was a spy for the Israelis.

    1. Re:Jonathon Pollard by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 1

      I know, but they ended up in the USSR, didn't they?

      --
      Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
    2. Re:Jonathon Pollard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, they did, but to go back to your original post:

      from Seymour Hersh's article on him in the New Yorker:

      Pollard's bragging and storytelling didn't prevent his immediate supervisors from recognizing his competence as an analyst. He was given many opportunities for promotion, but at least one of them he sabotaged. In the early nineteen-eighties, Lieutenant Commander David G. Muller, Jr., who ran an analytical section at Suitland, had an opening on his staff and summoned Pollard for an interview. "I had respect for him," Muller recalled recently. "He knew a lot about Navy hardware and a lot about the Middle East." An early-Monday-morning interview was set up. "Jay blew in the first thing Monday," Muller recounted. "He looked as if he hadn't slept or shaved. He proceeded to tell me that on Friday evening his then fiancee, Anne Henderson, had been kidnapped by I.R.A. operatives in Washington, and he'd spent the weekend chasing the kidnappers." Pollard said that he had managed to rescue his fiancee "only in the wee hours of Monday morning" -- just before his appointment. Of course, Pollard did not get the job, Muller said, but he still wishes that he had warned others. "I ought to have gone to the security people," Muller, who is retired, told me, "and said, 'Hey, this guy's a wacko.' "

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/576453/post s

  102. Depends on the level by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For privates? No, independant thought is not prized. You want people that will do their job, as they are ordered to, without question. The same is not true of officers. Even NCOs, but certianly anyone above Sergeant needs to be able to think, and the higher the rank, the more true that is.

    1. Re:Depends on the level by lgw · · Score: 2, Informative

      The more modern the army, the more the private needs to think. We discovered in Iraq that a sergeant in our army has as much authority and decision-making responsibility as a colonel in the region, and a private as much as an officer.

      Don't confuse discipline - respecting the authority of the chain of command and military custom - with lack of initiative. The modern military prizes initiative: complete the objective you're assigned without complaint, but think of the best way to do so based on your training and experience. To quote a marine sergeant writing a summary of action in Fallujah:

      All Marines must exercise initiative during combat. Squad leaders must design training techniques in order to stress initiative. Marines must be able to look around, assess what his squad or partner is doing, feed off it, and act in order to support them. Initiative based training is paramount.

      And also:

      Being a good combat leader sometimes means stepping back and allowing the Marines to do their jobs. Platoon commanders must allow squad leaders to lead their squads, squad leaders must allow element leaders to lead their elements, and element leaders must allow their Marines to take initiative.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  103. LARP != D&D by polter · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is it just me, or was it obvious that they're not talking about D&D, Live Action Role Playing is quite different.

    I've done both, BTW, I'm just saying, and I'm in security, so Bah!

    1. Re:LARP != D&D by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or was it obvious that they're not talking about D&D, Live Action Role Playing is quite different.

      I hate to admit it, being a big fan of role playing both pen and paper and MMORPGs, but the LARP people freak me out a bit too.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:LARP != D&D by dclydew · · Score: 1

      That's just cause you haven't been to one of my Cthulhu Live games....

      Muhahahahahahahahahahahah *ahem* ahahahahahahaha

      --
      Get a life, not a lifestyle. - Hikem Bey
    3. Re:LARP != D&D by east+coast · · Score: 1

      That's just cause you haven't been to one of my Cthulhu Live games....

      Cthulhu Live? Oh it's much more than a game to me. }:)

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  104. Indeed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I first played the summer of 1974 with photocopied rules. One of the group from back then did airborne and eventually ranger training. The last time I saw him, was in Time magazine giving chocolates to kids in Lebenon.

    Then again, most of us spent time with the works from SPI and Avalon Hill, so take this for whatever it's worth.

  105. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Bah! Screw D&D. I'm trying to move my players over to Fudge, a lightweight system that doesn't bog you down in rules.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  106. Bringing Christians and Jews together since 1974 by zombiestomper · · Score: 1

    That is all.

    BTW- Black Leaf in the Chick tract is a hottie.

  107. It's everywhere and everytime the same... by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According my observations on my friends and myself several decades ago, D&D style role-players are more (if not completely) resistant to propaganda, brain-washing and military drill. The real problem of recruiters with new recruits is, security clearance in military is not about trust, but about thought control. They trust no one. So they can't give security clearance to someone who's mind they can't control.

    Let me comment some headers of TFA:

    'Simply detached from reality'

    Does mean subject is mentally independent from factual perception, able to create experience according his own intentions. That allows him potentially diverge from lined propaganda. Note, the military propaganda is also somewhat "detached from reality", but other, organized and controlled way.

    'The game indicates a weak personality'

    "Strong personality" in military sense is someone who obeys all commands unquestionably and is capable to force them out to the lower levels. Higher intellect, which is often a characteristic for D&D players, is not a bonus for performing something that "does not make sense to do" in critical situation. Actually, in D&D all good players are very picky about what does make sense to do in dangerous conditions. Sometimes, simply stand and fight is not an option in dungeon and players already know about it.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
    1. Re:It's everywhere and everytime the same... by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

      I agree: "There's only one reality and it's what I tell you."
      And not only could a D&D player resist indoctrination, they could possibly just role-play their indoctrination.
      Once you have a 'wizard' personae , just make an 'indoctrinated soldier' personae , for your dealings with superiors,
      and play that out, but in real-life. Then after some atrocity, they real personae tells all on 60-minutes...

      It would be really funny if someone said they they've had tougher DM's than their Drill Instructor.

  108. Ideal soldiers! by Vlijmen+Fileer · · Score: 1

    Quote: "They're detached from reality and suscepitble to influence," the army says.
    I thought these were in fact basic necessities for a person to be admitted to any army? - They are characteristics of a truly moldable person, perfect to go out and kill without questioning!

  109. Jack Chick by etheriel · · Score: 5, Funny

    +1 Slashdotting Jack Chick

    1. Re: Jack Chick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, Jack Chick is an ignorant ass.

  110. The intel community is *full* of geeks! by Jurph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're only hurting themselves here. I worked in a building with no windows a few years back, and the cubicle decorations were typical geek couture: Star Wars, Star Trek, Tolkien, Dilbert, Far Side, math puns, archaic computer hardware, and whiteboards crammed with crazy doodles. You'd be an idiot to think there weren't dungeon-masters there!

    Everyone in the building had a high security clearance, and the vast majority of them were "free thinkers." The traits that made them most valuable in D&D also made them great analysts:

    - quick lateral thinkers
    - work well on small teams ("parties")
    - open to new or contradictory data ("plot twists"/"betrayals")
    - efficient min-maxers
    - logical approach to difficult situations

    I know if I ever go back to that kind of work, there'll be plenty of Elvish Paladins and Dwarven Mages and so forth. I wouldn't have it any other way!

  111. Perhaps it's a delusional thing. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the IDF has determined that people with a rich fantasy life are easier to subvert. Not that I really agree with this. I just think that people who are into RPGs can let reality get away from them.

    For example, when I was stationed at Langley back in the mid 80's, there was a 1Lt in my unit who was "Warload of Quux" - or somesuch - by night. During the day, his actual duties tended to interfere with his imaginary life - which was much more important to him.

    Last I heard, he got a bad OER, left the military, and now sells used cars in Hampton, VA.

    And still does the RPG thing at his trailer park.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  112. the WHOLE WORLD frowns at Isralie Army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    biggest breaker of UN treaties on this planet, holds nuke weapons without any oversight or regulation and is busy building a Berlin wall MKII

    just the kind of people i couldn't give a shit about

  113. no, that hold zero water by geekoid · · Score: 1

    It just means you hang out with creative smart people who happen to have the same hobby.

    Yes I game, no this isn't anti-gamer.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  114. YHBT. YHL. FOAD. by Safety+Cap · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Ynetnews" is written much like another "news" site I know: an outrageous headline, some carefully omitted facts, and a long enough article so that the majority (read: ADD) of readers get the "facts" the author intended, instead of the actual truth. That truth is buried at the bottom (probably to avoid litigation due to libel) of the article, natch.

    According to the actual facts, if you say you play D&D (not "D and D," dumbass), you are "evaluated." Note that evaluation is not always performed by a Psychologist, ("usually" != always). And then

    More than half of the soldiers sent for evaluation receive low security clearances ~.

    Note that they didn't say that the people who are evaluated are only the ones who admit to playing D&D; surely there are other reasons that could make one eligible for "evaluation." In fact, they could have ONLY ONE GUY who admitted to playing D&D, got evaluated and received a low security clearance, and their entire article could be true.

    One last thing: a real news site's editors would stamp out something like

    Most soldiers who play Dungeons and Dragons simply do not admit to it while they are in teh [sic] army, he says.

    So my guess is "Ynetnews" subscribes to the same story editing that /. does: queue's getting big, this one sounds good, post it, is it a dupe? who cares; just pass the gin 'n' juice.

    --
    Yeah, right.
  115. yes, it does sound like by geekoid · · Score: 1

    people I'd want in certian aspects of my army...those aspect are generally high clearence.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  116. chick.com slashdotted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hahahahah! Where's your Jesus now?!

  117. From TFA by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    " Most soldiers who play Dungeons and Dragons simply do not admit to it while they are in teh army, he says. "

    In other news, Israeli reporters like to play teh Counter-strike!! Pwned!!!

  118. Now THAT'S funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "D&D attracts imaginitive players who are able to think for themselves."

    This statement is funny. I mean. REALLY funny.

  119. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tthe Jack Chick site is /.ed

    good job.

  120. Really? by cliveholloway · · Score: 0, Troll

    I always thought AD&D was just D&D for people with a short attention span.

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  121. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by bhima · · Score: 1

    No! No! No! In the beginning there was only the void, then there was chainmail... :)

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  122. Darque Dungeon by laddhebert · · Score: 1
    http://www.epsilonminus.com/darquedungeon/

    Enjoy.

    /lh

    --
    Don't Panic.
  123. They sent me for an evaluation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I told that f*&#ing shrink that there was no way anybody could beat my DC25 + Wisdom modifier for influence. They still kicked me out.

  124. Just the wrong kind of "RPG", I guess.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The kind that they lob into Palestinian villages are still perfectly OK, right?

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  125. Tissue or Kleenex? by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    I have no idea if it's just a bad translation, or if they just really have no clue that there are other fantasy role playing games other than Dungeons and Dragons, so they're using it as a generic term.

    Also, just because you have folks who are dressed up and have foam weapons, it's not necessarily a LARP. There's also the category 'Live Action Wargamers', who fight, but don't go for that whole character development type stuff. Darkon, Markland, Dagorhir and to some degree, the SCA come to mind. (but the SCAdians will probably take offense to that).

    LARPs tend to be less about combat... stuff like NERO and Archaea.

    (I have no idea where Amtgard falls, as the only times I've seen their members, they were swinging pretty soft.. and they were using PVC cores, which would break quickly in most wargames, but that might not be all groups)

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Tissue or Kleenex? by nidarus · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have no idea if it's just a bad translation, or if they just really have no clue that there are other fantasy role playing games other than Dungeons and Dragons, so they're using it as a generic term.
      Both, more or less. Israelis often use the term RD&D to describe LARPs, and the translators decided to drop the "R".
    2. Re:Tissue or Kleenex? by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      Oh, I wouldn't take offence at calling the SCA's martial side 'Live Action Wargaming,' and I'm a SCAdian. It's probably a fair description. We do more than that (e.g. historical brewing, music, cooking, clothing and so on), but the fighting could be called a form of wargaming.

  126. Chick's going to go after us!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I bet he's going after /. next.

    Damn us godless barbarians who're interfering with god's work.

    1. Re:Chick's going to go after us!!! by malex23 · · Score: 1

      Cindy: What are you reading, Bobby?
      Bobby: I'm just checking for new posts on Slashdot.
      Cindy: But don't you realize that Cowbody Neil is a agent of Satan?
      Insubstantal Demons: Don't listen to her, Bobby! Download more Bittorrent files instead!

  127. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by Aeonite · · Score: 2, Informative

    The D&D and AD&D split happened when Gygax and Arneson couldn't agree on a royalty dispute. AD&D and D&D became separate rule sets. AD&D then became AD&D 2nd Edition. And when it came time for a new edition, they looked at the name and decided to drop the 'Advanced' and just call it D&D 3rd Edition, since all those old disputes had long since been worked out. And now, of course, it's 3.5.

    So D&D begat AD&D begat AD&D 2nd Edition begat D&D 3rd Edition, which is really AD&D 3rd Edition, sorta kinda.

    So D&D is not just the precursor any more. The name has come full circle.

  128. Role play by mikewhittaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe it's the role-playing aspect that they don't like - putting yourself in someone else's shoes.

    Heaven forbid that a grunt might think back to being a schoolkid him/her self and not pull the trigger on a child who strayed off a path.

  129. I find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with your sentiment.

    But I find that anybody who uses the word "immature" is usually under 20. At some level.

    1. Re:I find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I find that anybody who uses the word "immature" is usually under 20. At some level.

      I find that anyone over 18 (3d6) before modifiers is usually cheating. At some level.

  130. Makes sense by Serveert · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not to be mean but some of you trekkie / D&D types are really scary. Don't get me wrong, I love to program, but I get scared when I see your long greasy hair/cowboy hat/D&D attire.

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    1. Re:Makes sense by dclydew · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, we feel the same way about you... freak.

      --
      Get a life, not a lifestyle. - Hikem Bey
  131. these guys should meet by tehwebguy · · Score: 0

    i'm sure there's a jack thompson quote somewhere that would help them support their reason for doing this haha

    --
    -- lol pwned
  132. US Military doesn't seem to share the opinion by Simulant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm almost certain I told my recruiter (US Air Force) that I played D&D. In fact when I joined, I had a weekly game going on at the rec center across the street from the recruiter's office, with military players involved. I most definitely told told the recruiter I smoked pot (but was quitting, which I did for four years).

    They gave me a TS SCI clearance. Also, the Army hired me years later and gave me a Secret... (or they tried... I quit before it came through, nearly two years later. Still, I had a interim secret clearance for that period)

    On the other hand... If anyone had ever stuck a gun in my hand and told me to shoot someone, I'd have probably deserted.

  133. Nope by Swamii · · Score: 1
    One quicky: not to be a spelling Nazi, but it's "Israel", not "Isreal".

    To address what you mentioned about radical Christians supporting Israel: you are wrong in that it is only radical Christians; almost all Protestant churches now openly proclaim support for Israel. Also, this support is not contigent on Christian end-time beliefs, as some progressives would have you believe.

    • We support Israel because Jews are brothers in faith.
    • Jews worship the same God as Christians. Christians happen to believe Jesus was the Biblical Messiah, whereas Jews are still searching for the Messiah.
    • Christians agree with Jews that the Tenach (Jewish Scriptures) is inspired by God, is absolute truth, and is part of Christian Scripture.
    • Christians believe that the spirit of radical Islam around the world is conspiring against Jews and Christians, so we have a common defense against it as well as sympathy for Israel under the constant bombardment of radical Islamic terror.
    • Jesus himself was a Jew, born in Israel of a mother and father descended from the tribe of Judah (through which a majority of Jews today trace their descendence).
    • Jesus mentioned that he loved his people and he longed to gather them together in Jerusalem.
    • In the New Testament, a Jew named Paul writes that anyone who believes in the Messiah (Jesus) is grafted into Israel. In a sense, we are spiritual brothers with the Jews.
    • Scripture says that the people of Israel are God's people for eternity, not the Church nor Christians.
    • We believe that the land of Israel belongs to the people of Israel.
    • Finally, in Scripture, David wrote in the Psalms that God will bless those that bless Israel.


    Hope that gives you a better knowledge of why we support Israel and the Jewish people.
    --
    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    1. Re:Nope by bloggins02 · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does this guy sound just as silly and insane as Islamic Extremists?

    2. Re:Nope by wk633 · · Score: 1

      Ya. And that's pretty much why you support Islam as well, right? Brothers in faith?

    3. Re:Nope by kenji_watanabe · · Score: 1

      Jews worship the same God as Christians Not to be picky, but if your a monotheist, and person X calls God Adonai and person Y calls God Allah, isn't it still the same entity?

    4. Re:Nope by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Early Judaism did not profess that there were no other gods, just that theirs was the best and that they should not worship the other ones. So if some other religion worships one god, but he sounds really different from the Jewish God, then maybe he's actually a different and lesser god.

      While the monotheistic religions have ironed out this kink by saying that they worship the only God, it frequently seems as if they are still driven by their original I-have-the-best-God values.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:Nope by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      The thing that so many of these weirdos forget is that people who believe literally in every word of the Bible are radical Christians. Most Christians do not believe every single word of the Bible. They stay out of this kind of idiotic debate, so the radical Christians wind up thinking that it's just a matter of them, the Christian majority, vs the heathens.

      But it isn't.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:Nope by wk633 · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered about that song "Our God is a Mighty God", which would kind of indicate 'other Gods'.

    7. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably just has more rhythm to it than "God is mighty".

    8. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all Christians think the same way.

      Jews (as a race) are *not* brothers in faith with Christians. Neither does Judaism as a faith structure count, for rejection of Jesus as the Messiah is rejection of the whole thing.

      Jews do *not* worship the same God. If you reject the Son, you reject the Father.

      (Some) Jews believe that the Rabbinical writings are on par with the rest of Jewish Scripture.

      I'm less inclined to speak on behalf of a Muslim, so I'll skip the next point.

      Jesus' Jewish heritage was never in question. Genetic heritage does not equate to spiritual heritage.

      Who exactly is Jesus' people? Those who follow him.

      Yes, some were grafted in, and others were cut off. It becomes very difficult to rationalize Paul's efforts in proselytizing the Jews if those efforts were entirely unnecessary.

      I know no one reads AC postings (I should just create an account instead of lurking), but not all Christians are de facto on the pro-Israel bandwagon. Theological differences at this level (who is the *true* Israel? the church is ...) *do* have significant influence on one's eschatology. A dispensational theologian is far more likely to agree with the PP, than say, a covenental theologian. For the most part, this post is more or less a historical majority view, while the parent is a more or a less recent majority view.

      I could build a case for Christian support of all Muslim nations based on similar arguments as above (Jesus was a prophet, monotheistic worship, common genetic ancestry shared with Abraham).

    9. Re:Nope by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Being a Jew myself who believes in the Messiah, Jesus, I can tell you that almost every Jew and Gentile I meet who visits a church or a synagogue believes that the Bible is the inspired word of God. So I contend with your first point, but it's a moot point regardless.

      It's definitely not a matter of Christians vs. heathens, although some polticians and religionists want to make it like that. After all, we who call ourselves followers of Jesus are often just as evil and sinful as those who don't.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    10. Re:Nope by Swamii · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, Islam denounces the Tenach (Old Testament) as a lie, changed by Jews. Because of this they are not our spiritual brothers in faith as the Jews are.

      Quickie lesson:

      Abraham in the Bible had 2 sons: Isaac, who is the father of modern day Jews, and Ishmael, who is the father of modern day Arabs. Jewish & Christian Scripture agree that God annointed Isaac, and therefore his descendants (the Jews) are God's people.

      Islam tells us that the conniving Jews lied and changed the Bible so that Isaac got annointed, when it was supposedly Ishmael that was annointed by God, and therefore his descendants (the Arabs) are God's people.

      Additionally, the Qu'uran commands Muslims not to associate with Jews and Christians because they are bound together in their common faiths.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    11. Re:Nope by wk633 · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      Quickie return lesson. My God didn't annoint anyone, and doesn't have a 'chosen people'. We're all his children.

    12. Re:Nope by Swamii · · Score: 1

      I would argue that anyone who follows God becomes a child of God.

      As Paul says in the New Testament, those who believe in Christ are grafted into Israel, thereby inheriting all the blessings and promises God gave to Abraham and his descendants.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    13. Re:Nope by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Dispensationalism and replacement theology is a lie invented by 4th & 5th century Catholics as a means to glorify the Catholic Church and condemn the Jews and force their conversion to the Catholic faith. See my blog for more information.

      That said, I want to address the points you made.

      I agree with you on the Judaism point. Judaism (modern day yes, but even during Jesus' time) definitely is not the original faith in Yahweh. The faith in Yahweh was perverted by corrupt Rabbanites who polluted the faith with an abundance of rites and rituals.

      Yes, modern-day Pharisees (a sect of Judaism) believe that rabbinic writings (the 3 volumes of Talmud) are Scripture. As I mentioned in my previous point, this is a preversion of the original faith in Yahweh and is definitely false. I tend more to agree with Karaite views of Judaism than Rabbanite views.

      Your point about genetic heritage, I can only hope you realize how important it was from a spiritual and prophetic standpoint that Jesus was born out of the tribe of Judah. Over 700 prophecies in the Tenach that the Messiah will come "from the rod of Jesse, root of Judah, from the line of David", in particular, it was very significant that the Messiah come from the scepter tribe, Judah, whom according to Yahweh, the kings of Israel must be born from.

      I agree with your point that those who follow Jesus are God's people. As I cited Paul, we are grafted into the commonwealth of Israel by our faith in the Messiah, thereby inheriting the blessings and promises given to Abraham. That said, Jews are still blind to the Messiah and therefore lost, but they are still our brothers in faith.

      When rabbis asked Jesus why he came, he said "I came for none but the lost sheep of Israel".

      Who is the true Israel? Simple, the people of Israel. God didn't change, nor did Jesus come to invent a new religion. God is the same, his people is Israel for all eternity (mentioned numerous times in the Tenach) and by the Scriptural Messiah, we are grafted into God's people, Israel.

      Please visit my blog, I speak much about Israel, Judaism, and Christianity, and I'd love to hear your input on some of these topics. http://judahgabriel.blogspot.com

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    14. Re:Nope by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Adonai and Allah are generic titles for God. By that alone, you could make the argument we are worshipping the same God.

      Now if someone were to say to me, "I believe in God/Allah/Adonai" I wouldn't know if we are believing in the same entity. If he instead said, "I believe in Yahweh" then I would know we believe in the same entity. See my blog post here for more information on the name of God.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    15. Re:Nope by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1
      Being a Jew myself who believes in the Messiah, Jesus, I can tell you that almost every Jew and Gentile I meet who visits a church or a synagogue believes that the Bible is the inspired word of God.
      I don't doubt that. The criterion you have supplied means that your experience does not necessarily speak to my first point.
      It's definitely not a matter of Christians vs. heathens, although some polticians and religionists want to make it like that.
      I oversimplified and distracted. I was attempting to discuss why you spoke as if you are a radical Christian ("silly & insane as Islamic extremists") but do not believe yourself to be so. All the people that you speak to that you consider to be Jews and Christians also believe that the Torah or Bible is the inspired word of God. So you do not think that you are out of the mainstream, but you are.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    16. Re:Nope by Swamii · · Score: 1

      If I'm silly and insane for believing in God & Scripture, then lock me up, I'm guilty. :-)

      I agree with you that I am out of the mainstream world though. It has never been popular to believe in God. Putting it simply, the world doesn't like things that aren't worldly and humanistic.

      I'm blessed & fortunate to be part of the vocal minority who believe in God and reject the rampant, ubiquitous humanism and materialism around us.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    17. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few things for you to think about. I am not trying to flame, or to criticize your religious beleifs.

      Jews worship the same God as Christians.
      As do Muslims.

      Christians believe that the spirit of radical Islam around the world is conspiring against Jews and Christians
      That's a very broad generalization. I know many Christians and Jews who would not agree with you. True, there are radical sects that want to destroy Jews and Americans, but most Muslims just want to live in peace, like us.

      We believe that the land of Israel belongs to the people of Israel.
      Genetic testing has revealed that the Palestinians and the semetic Jews have common ancestors. They are all the people of Israel (some of them just call it "Palestine").

      But in any case, as a Jew myself, I welcome your support of our people. History shows that we sure need it when we can get it ;-) But please don't let that support manifest itself as blanket approval of the actions of the (mostly secular) Israeli government and IDF.

    18. Re:Nope by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Well, then we're all on the same page :)

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    19. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm blessed & fortunate to be part of the vocal minority who believe in God

      I don't know where you're posting from, but here in America, that is certainly not the case.

    20. Re:Nope by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Additionally, the Qu'uran commands Muslims not to associate with Jews and Christians because they are bound together in their common faiths."

      well then quit strapping bombs on and associating with us already...sheeesh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as you leave our oil alone!

    22. Re:Nope by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Well, one could argue that Islamic extremists do not represent mainstream Islam, although by the news headlines it sometimes seems that way.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    23. Re:Nope by Swamii · · Score: 1

      I would argue that going to church and calling yourself a Christian does not necessarily make you a believer in God.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    24. Re:Nope by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your insight, very interesting. I'd like to address a few points you made.

      While Muslims follow Allah (which is a generic title of "God"), one has to wonder, are they really following after Yahweh, God of Israel? They claim much of what's written in the OT by God is a lie, fabricated by Jewish rabbis over the centuries, they denounce many of the prophets in the Tenach, if everything of Yahweh's is a lie to them, it's almost as if they are following another god altogether.

      As far as Islam goes, I don't mean to bash all Muslims, which is the reason I said "radical Islam". Much of radical Islam wants to destroy Israel as well as followers of Christ.

      Of course Palestinians and Jews have common ancestry -- Abraham was the father of Isaac (progenitor father of Jacob/Israel and all modern day Jews) as well as the father of Ishmael, progenitor of modern day Arabs. God gave the land to Jacob, whom God renamed "Israel". Who are Jacob's decendants? We, the Jewish people, are Jacob's descendants, as well as the Israelites who were scattered and now lost in the gentile nations after Solomon's reign. To say Arabs are the people of Israel is factually wrong; Arabs (including Palestinians) are people of Ishmael, not Israel.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    25. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't trust anyone who believes in imaginary invisible "friends."

      Especially when they do so cause a book told them to.

    26. Re:Nope by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, anti-Jewishness among Muslims and pro-Jewishness among those of Christian faiths is a relatively recent development.

      For centuries Jews and Christians were given special, protected status under Muslim law. In many cases they were allowed to govern their own communities and live by their own laws. They are considered "believers" by Muslims, as opposed, say, to followers of the Hindu faith, who are NOT considered believers and may be dealt with in whatever way Muslim rulers see fit. During the middle ages and even as late as the 1800s it was usually better to be a Jew under a Muslim ruler than a Christian one, though there were exceptions on both sides--some particularly mean Muslim rulers and a few uncommonly tolerant Christian rulers.

    27. Re:Nope by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      I'm blessed & fortunate to be part of the vocal minority who believe in God and reject the rampant, ubiquitous humanism and materialism around us.

      As a secular humanist, I also reject the rampant materialism ,but I can't see that humanism is ubiquitous as well. Not sure why it would be a bad thing, either - except of course, it doesn't exalt the desires of a hypothetical being above the needs of real people. Well, nothing's perfect.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    28. Re:Nope by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Jesus wasn't and isn't imaginery; any history book confirms that Jesus did in fact walk this earth, Jewish historians such as Josephus confirm his existence, as well as the rabbis who wrote Talmud (this despite both sources not believing in him as the messiah).

      Any history book confirms Jesus did exist; it's more a matter of whether you want to ignore him or acknowledge him.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
  134. Is it just me? by Meest · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I then only one that see's a bunch of soldiers with rocks yelling

    Soldier = "LIGHTNING BOLT!!! LIGHTNING BOLT!!"

    Enemy in big homemade suit = "RAWGRAWGRAWRG"

    Soldier = "LIGHTNING BOLT!!! LIGHTNING BOLT!!"

  135. You're right. But wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Your description fits the old Soviet military, but not ours."

    Simply not true. Our army and the soviet's army have a lot more in common than you think.

    Ask the Nazi's what they thought of the soviet army.

  136. Hmmm by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    D&D. Runequest. Warhammer. Heroquest. Everquest. Lineage. Worlds of Warcraft Battlefield 1941? Dark Ages of Camelot The Sims Online? There are a LOT of "fantasy" reality games out there and they are only increasing. Having played D&D and Everquest, let me tell you the folks playing everquest are a lot farther out from reality (some spending 60+ hours a week in game) than the average D&D Player (6 hours a week, maybe less). Some D&D players are spacy- some are hard headed realists. Some movie buffs are spacy- some just like movies a lot. It sounds like the DFF is sterotyping a huge group of people based on a part of it's population.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  137. Nail, meet hammer. by Da+VinMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think you hit the nail on the head. I wish I had mod points for your post.

    Being impressionable and in a sensitive position means you are ripe for the harvest in a counter intelligence situation. You will be much easier to convert to the opposition's cause as it will be much easier to have you see the issue from their point of view and develop sympathy for their position.

    A flexible mindset isn't automatically an overly flexible mindset; it's just that much more prone to changes over time. A changed mindset and set of beliefs can manifest as treason.

    So, in a way, the IDF is doing those soldiers a favor. They protecting Israel from an increased likelihood of treason, and they're protecting those soldiers from themselves.

    Yeah, it's kind of a control freak thing, but it *is* a military organization.

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
    1. Re:Nail, meet hammer. by Duckman5 · · Score: 1
      impressionable
      adj : easily impressed or influenced;

      adaptable
      adj : capable of adapting (of becoming or being made suitable) to a particular situation or use;
      I think the you and the grandparent seem to be confusing these two words. They have very different meanings. A person who plays a role playing game is "adaptable." They can take a situation of which they have no actual experience and use what they know to deal with it. I've never lived in a world of magic and armored warfare, but I managed to adapt to playing D&D back in high school. What I did not do, however, was take that information and run around during my daily life believing anyone could be a mage capable of casting "magic missile" on me. Someone who does that does not do that as a result of playing D&D, they do that as a result of being crazy.
    2. Re:Nail, meet hammer. by northcat · · Score: 1

      No, we did mean Impressionable and that's the whole point. TFA says they are "suscepitble to influence" and that's we meant too. Please the other comments on this thread and TFA for an explanation as to why.

    3. Re:Nail, meet hammer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I did not do, however, was take that information and run around during my daily life believing anyone could be a mage capable of casting "magic missile" on me.

      You've mistaken their meaning.

      The IDF does not claim that D&D players are delusional. They aren't saying that players have problems distinguishing between reality and fantasy. Well, okay, they do say that a little, but it's not the main point.

      What they are trying to say is that D&D players are more easily swayed. That they are not so hard-nosed as others. That they are less inclined to give automatic respect to military authority. That they are more willing to listen to someone who is feeding them a hard-luck story, a romantic tale, or a conspiracy theory.

      This is what allegedly makes them more of a security risk.

      In other words, although the Geek class may have a +2 to INT, the D&D Player subclass has a -3 penalty to Save vs. Spells.

    4. Re:Nail, meet hammer. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could provide the studies that show that you are doing anything but spouting bullshit.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Nail, meet hammer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you could provide the studies that show that you are doing anything but spouting bullshit.

      Hey, I didn't claim it was actually true. I personally think the IDF is full of crap on this.

      But if you're going to comment on the article, it's worth pointing out that the IDF is not actually worried about its troops who think 'magic missile' is for real.

      What they are worried about is that some foreign agent could exploit soldiers who are gamers.

      Appealing to people's romantic instincts, idealism, or sense of adventure is a very popular way to conduct espionage. Examples: the methods of the famous spy Mata Hari, the way that the Mossad (and/or CIA) abducted Mordechai Vanunu, the apparent motivations for Robert Hanssen to betray the US for years with little financial reward.

      On the other hand, pure greed is probably an even better way to turn people. (Example: Aldrich Ames) And addiction to alcohol, hard drugs, or gambling is probably high risk factor as well. I doubt that the IDF screens so aggressively for these.

    6. Re:Nail, meet hammer. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      What they are worried about is that some foreign agent could exploit soldiers who are gamers.

      Oh, I'm sure they're worried about it. I think they are full of shit. I've played with a lot of personality types, from the compliant and easily swayed to the rule-lawyering bore to the latent psychotic munchkin who isn't satisfied until his character has a weapon on every inch of the surface of his body.

      In other words, what we're seeing here is an idiotic overgeneralization of a hobby that attracts a lot of different kinds of people. This is no different than all those ultra-Fundie Christians that run around saying gamers are servants of the devil.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  138. From TFA: by menace3society · · Score: 1
    "It's not a game of winners and losers," Matan says, "but rather entry into another world with stories and plot changes."

    Perhaps that's the reason? They're worried that the soldiers will try and cooperate with the enemies to maximize the richness of their war stories?

    In all seriousness, D&D with its levels and experience points, encourages the mindset that advancement/promotion merely comes from working hard, and that everyone does it eventually. Not to mention the fact that in D&D one gets experience points from 1) Killing things ("Why can't I be a seargeant? I killed thirteen terrorists last month!") or 2) Collecting loot. Now, I'm the number two directive of the IDF (after national defense etc) is "Don't piss off the palestinians, neighboring Arabs, and other countries any more than you absolutely have to." You can see how wanton killing and plundering would violate this.

  139. Aight... by bloggins02 · · Score: 2, Funny
  140. Idea! by tsanth · · Score: 1

    Perhaps someone should make a sports-based RPG, like playing basketball or football or football with a bunch of dice-rolling.

    ...or has this already been done?

    1. Re:Idea! by brother_b · · Score: 1

      It's called Blitzball in Final Fantasy X. It's a sports game that is played as turn-based with a "die roll" for randomization with the pre-existing stats.

    2. Re:Idea! by mabinogi · · Score: 1
      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  141. Obsolete by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

    People still play D&D? I thought it was all just a joke for nerds that lived in the '80s.

    --
    // This is not a sig.
  142. The Trilogy by blechx · · Score: 2, Funny

    The game has also increased in popularity due to the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy. Yeah, before 1955 D&D wasnt NEARLY as popular...

  143. Maybe the low clearance is based on stupidity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once word of this spreads, anyone who does volunteer that they play D&D is probably too stupid to trust with state secrets anyway.

  144. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by starwed · · Score: 1

    Or try the HTML version. (Much nicer formatting.)

  145. Israel does this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only they give their retards uniforms and call them recruits. ^_^

  146. I don't know about you but ... by KSobby · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you but I certainly don't want the guy next to me in the fox-hole rolling for initiative before deciding to fire. Besides, the pointy wizard's hats stick out of the top of most fox-holes.

    --
    "It's difficult to meditate on amphetamines." - Joe Walsh
  147. Put Them on the Group W bench by sfjoe · · Score: 4, Funny


    "I went over to the sargent, said, "Sargeant, you got a lot a damn gall to ask me if I've rehabilitated myself, I mean, I mean, I mean that just, I'm sittin' here on the bench, I mean I'm sittin here on the Group W bench 'cause you want to know if I'm moral enough join the army, burn women, kids, houses and villages after bein' a litterbug." He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send you fingerprints off to Washington."

    --
    It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
  148. And the Clinical Psychologists... by carcajou · · Score: 1

    make them role play...ain't it a funny world!

  149. it's LARPing not D&D(bad translation) by proind · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article (at least the original one in Hebrew) doesn't talk about D&D but about LARPing (apparently it was mistranslated). Also these people are not automatically discarded but go through a psychological evaluation to decide whether they might pose a problem. The article mentions that about 50% of these people don't receive a security clearance, which means that 50% of them do get it. The problem with the other 50% being that they have trouble distinguishing between reality and fantasy (this decided after a thorough psychological evaluation and not just because the army doesn't like the games they play). Obviously the IDF believes that LARPing might be a symptom of a psychological problem but not necessarily the problem itself.

    --
    When Geiger counters are outlawed, only mutants will have Geiger counters
    1. Re:it's LARPing not D&D(bad translation) by dclydew · · Score: 1

      Well said! Wish I could mod you up....

      --
      Get a life, not a lifestyle. - Hikem Bey
  150. You = Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Now the US Army just wants bodies...

    Of course the article was about the Israeli Army, but don't let facts get in the way of your ideology.

    1. Re:You = Dumbass by gibbsjoh · · Score: 1

      Why post as AC?

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
  151. Great! Can I avoid the draft, too? by aGuyNamedJoe · · Score: 1

    I think we need to import this idea to the US. Imagine if you couldn't be drafted or join the military if you'd played D&D...

    "Poor kid, he played D&D at 15, now he can't get a free ticket to Iraq!"

  152. Great by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Id be more worried about recruits who have been directly affected by suicide attacks because it just fuels the circle of violence and ends up with them sniping kids or running people over in bulldozers. no way do i trust an 18 year old (or most other people for that matter) with a gun and raging hormones who has seen his best friend, girl friend or parents blown up, to act responsibly and professionally and without bias and in the situation that Israel and Palestine are in one soldier can do way too much damage, same goes for the other side but hey.

    Not trying to thread-jack, just think they need to get their priorities straight.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  153. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by Tassach · · Score: 1

    If you want lightweight rules, try GURPS lite, available as a free download from your buddies at Steve Jackson games.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  154. Ah. by tsanth · · Score: 1

    I was actually thinking of a pen-and-paper game, but thanks for reminding me--it's been a while since I last played FFX.

  155. On the other hand... by orzetto · · Score: 1

    Just remember that you know that lobotomy and ECT don't work because some experts told you.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    1. Re:On the other hand... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Casual observation could have just as easily proven that lobotomy and ECT were ineffectively used.

      Those were just the first examples, and the most heinous that come to mind. My argument is simply that you cannot appeal to academics alone, for they so often disagree amongst themselves, and are always trying to disprove each other.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  156. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    I was never terribly impressed with GURPs. I like Fudge a lot better. It can be very rules light, and I've even got to the stage where I don't even use attributes any more.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  157. OT/Sig: Yellow Ribbon Magnets by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

    Your current sig:
    Yellow ribbon magnets on cars- true patriotism or just a fad? Support the troops, acknowledge the lies behind the war.

    With a cousin in Regular Army (meaning that he's in for life), I opted for the blue ribbon. Its message: "Bring Home Our Troops". I only wish they'd designed it with the message in boldface instead of wimpy italics.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  158. A world of make-believe... by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, if you want to bring up playing around with fantasies...

    Um, let's say someone believes that his country has a right to occupy a piece of land because 3000 or so years ago his ancestor obediently offered up his son to be a human sacrifice because a voice he heard in his head told him to. The voice in his head later rescinded its instructions to kill the guy's son, because he showed that he would value the approval of the voice in his head over that of a little boy one of his wives dropped off for him. This of course showed that human sacrifice was a-okay with the people of time, of course, but that's a talk for another time.

    Okay, and then we have the guy who obtained great favor with his voice in his head when he offered up his virgin daughter to the mob for rape and/or murder if the would leave the three guys (who he suspected to be angels) alone.

    Then we another guy who listened to the voice in HIS head which told him to clear town with his family because the voice was fixing to burn everyone alive because they were pissing the voice off. A wife looked back as they were leaving, the guy says, and was turned into a box of Morton's salt. At least that's what he told her kin when they asked where the hell she was.

    Then we have the guy who heard a voice telling him to build a boat, put two of everything in it, and wait out a world flood which later no one else remembers happening, like, say, the Chinese, having been around for 4000 years or more.

    That's reality-based community, not like them D&D fantasists.

    You wouldn't want people who had strange ideas about reality in the ranks of your specialist armed forces.

    1. Re:A world of make-believe... by jobcello · · Score: 1, Informative

      Chinese and many other civilizations have flood stories.
      Check out what wikipedia has on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah's_Ark
      Truth is stranger than fiction.

    2. Re:A world of make-believe... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      " Chinese and many other civilizations have flood stories. "

      But they don't believe it really happened. They call their stories "stories".

      And their stories don't mention that they were wiped out and replaced by the family of some guy from the middle east.

    3. Re:A world of make-believe... by Random832 · · Score: 1

      Aren't the second and third ones you listed the same guy?

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    4. Re:A world of make-believe... by alienmole · · Score: 1

      You made my day. Of course, it could be argued that the IDF is excluding people who have room in their brains for fantasies other than the officially approved fantasy. Naturally, they can't state the real reason for granting them a lower security clearance is that they feel threatened by such people's capacity for ideas and questioning official lines of thought, and that they want to marginalize them because of that.

      On the subject of the flood, though, the wikipedia article referenced by another poster points out the widely-accepted idea that "the near-universality of the story in all cultures and times makes it much more likely that it originated in an actual, historical event." That doesn't mean the myth of Noah's ark has any basis in reality, that could simply be the mythologizing of a major flood event.

      One interesting candidate for a flood event which I didn't notice in Wikipedia's Noah article is the eruption of the Toba supervolcano. Wikipedia has a separate article about the Toba catastrophe theory. The eruption of that supervolcano about 75,000 years ago would have created a tsunami which would have made the recent tsunami pale in comparison.

      Genetic evidence seems to confirm a major die-off of humans around this time. That could certainly explain the widespread flood myths. The fantastical aspects of those stories need no explanation; creative humans interpreted the event in ways that the Israeli army would not approve of, if those interpretations weren't a fait accompli that are already embedded in accepted fantasies, and which are sometimes used to justify their army's existence and mission.

    5. Re:A world of make-believe... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Most Jews in Israeli are secular. Just saying.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:A world of make-believe... by ApostateApostle · · Score: 1

      "Then we have the guy who heard a voice telling him to build a boat, put two of everything in it, and wait out a world flood which later no one else remembers happening, like, say, the Chinese, having been around for 4000 years or more."

      Of course the Chinese don't have records of it, godless red communists don't float! ;P

    7. Re:A world of make-believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same event, different guy. There were two "righteous" guys in the city at the time. One was a "prophet" who told the other (the one who "entertained strangers") to pack up and leave town with him.

    8. Re:A world of make-believe... by capoccia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ and a brother of James,to those who have been called, who are loved in God the Father and kept for Jesus Christ:

      Mercy, peace and love be yours in abundance.

      Dear friends, although I was very eager to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt compelled to write and urge you to contend for the faith that the Lord has once for all entrusted to us, his people. For certain individuals whose condemnation was written about long ago have secretly slipped in among you. They are ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord.

      Though you already know all this, I want to remind you that the Lord at one time delivered his people out of Egypt, but later destroyed those who did not believe. And the angels who did not keep their positions of authority but abandoned their proper dwelling--these he has kept in darkness, bound with everlasting chains for judgment on the great Day. In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.

      In the very same way, on the strength of their dreams these ungodly people pollute their own bodies, reject authority and heap abuse on celestial beings. But even the archangel Michael, when he was disputing with the devil about the body of Moses, did not himself dare to condemn him for slander but said, "The Lord rebuke you!" Yet these people speak abusively against whatever they do not understand; and what things they do understand by instinct, like unreasoning animals--these are the very things that destroy them.

      Woe to them! They have taken the way of Cain; they have rushed for profit into Balaam's error; they have been destroyed in Korah's rebellion.

      These people are blemishes at your love feasts, eating with you without the slightest qualm--shepherds who feed only themselves. They are clouds without rain, blown along by the wind; autumn trees, without fruit and uprooted--twice dead. They are wild waves of the sea, foaming up their shame; wandering stars, for whom blackest darkness has been reserved forever.

      Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about them: "See, the Lord is coming with thousands upon thousands of his holy ones to judge everyone, and to convict all the ungodly of all the ungodly acts they have done in an ungodly way, and of all the defiant words ungodly sinners have spoken against him." These people are grumblers and faultfinders; they follow their own evil desires; they boast about themselves and flatter others for their own advantage.

      But, dear friends, remember what the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ foretold. They said to you, "In the last times there will be scoffers who will follow their own ungodly desires." These are the people who divide you, who follow mere natural instincts and do not have the Spirit.

      But you, dear friends, by building yourselves up in your most holy faith and praying in the Holy Spirit, keep yourselves in God's love as you wait for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ to bring you to eternal life.

      Be merciful to those who doubt; save others by snatching them from the fire; to others show mercy, mixed with fear--hating even the clothing stained by corrupted flesh.

      To him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

  159. If D&D is bad by dammy · · Score: 1

    If IDF thinks D&D are bad, what do they think of MMORPGers?

    Dammy
    No one touches my Dark Ages of Camelot, no one gets hurt!

  160. What the hell.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. is D&D?

    1. Re:What the hell.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A game for virgins and homos.

  161. Re:You're right. But wrong. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Your description fits the old Soviet military, but not ours."

    Simply not true. Our army and the soviet's army have a lot more in common than you think.

    Hey, I'm not saying that the Red Army had a single strategy of "send wave after wave of cannon fodder until the enemy collapses" (though they did use this tactic on occasion in WW2). All I'm saying is that the Red Army did not value the same degree of "individual initiative" the US Army does. The fact of the matter is that the Red Army expected the officers and mid- to senior-grade NCOs to direct the actions of the privates and junior NCOs, and they were expected to obey. This is basically true of any army, but the Red Army took it to the extreme that (say) if their officers were killed, a motorized rifle platoon would often be at a loss to continue until they could get the company commander to assign an officer to them to relay orders. The divide between the "head" and the "body" was a lot wider, mostly because the filled the lower ranks with conscripts fulfilling their compulsory service.

    Ask the Nazi's what they thought of the soviet army.

    The Nazi high command mostly thought they were crazy hordes of untrained peasants, and that whatever skill they appeared to have in night fighting or camouflage was due to the "natural cunning of the slav" rather than training. Their asessment was, naturally, in error. My grandfather, a private in the Wehrmacht at Stalingrad, did not concur with this sentiment.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  162. The cloak of by Gene303 · · Score: 0

    invincibility may not work on suicide bombers, and that is perhaps one of the concerns that the military may have.

    --
    im a hippie
  163. TFA contradicts itself by Caiwyn · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the article:

    Ynetnews has learned that 18-year-olds who tell recruiters they play the popular fantasy game are automatically given low security clearance.

    Then, later:

    "One of the tests we do, either by asking soldiers directly or through information provided us, is to ask whether they take part in the game," he says. "If a soldier answers in the affirmative, he is sent to a professional for an evaluation, usually a psychologist."

    More than half of the soldiers sent for evaluation receive low security clearances, thus preventing them from serving in sensitive IDF positions, he says.


    Half of the soldiers being given low security clearances after being sent for psychological evaluation isn't the same thing as "automatic." Which one is it, Ynet?

    1. Re:TFA contradicts itself by rkaa · · Score: 1

      Parameters are simply missing here. It does not say that ALL the soldiers sent for evaluation were sent there because they answered yes to taking part in games. That would actually be very unlikely. There is such a fine plethora of contemporary character disorders. I mean.. if 100 people were sent for evaluation all in all; 50 gamers and 50 psychopaths... and then the 50 psychos passed the clearance but the 50 gamers failed... etc. You get the drift.

  164. Slashdot on the ball again! by The_Incubator · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I read about this elsewhere on Monday.

    Remember *NEW*s For Nerds?

    Only thing left to do is dupe it tomorrow.

    Nick

  165. dice by obzidian · · Score: 1

    I bet it is hard to find kosher disc anyway... sigh.

    --
    Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    1. Re:dice by obzidian · · Score: 1

      that's dice. -ahem- Just wrote a final. Brain hurts. Shouldn't be /.ing with low brain.

      --
      Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  166. Playing D & D will get one kicked out of the a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome.
    I for one welcome our dungeon master overlords.

  167. The article is NOT accurate - Hebrew story on RD&a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly, something got lost in translation.
    The original article in Hebrew talks about RD&D Players. I personally know a person who said he plays RD&D and was called to a 2nd meeting with a psychologist. The psychologist explained him that he's been called just to verify that he's mentally 'ok'. But you don't get classified automatically.

  168. Don't worry - it's reciprocated by Attaturk · · Score: 1


    Don't worry - D&D players feel the same way about the IDF. =P Seriously though, I always thought that all the numbers and stats floating around in D&D were probably helpful to intellectual development. With absolutely nothing to back up my case (much like TFA) I'd tend to believe that D&D veterans actually have an intellectual edge over people that simply run around a track or kick a ball around a field throughout their education. And if they are smarter then perhaps they really do frown upon the IDF. ;-)

  169. Howdy :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IDF knows what it's doing, as an Israeli that "did his time" in the army, I've meet a few d&d players... i can say that about 90% of them were out of touch with reality, so i have to agree with the IDF decision... plain and simple

  170. Israel? by Steve+B · · Score: 1

    I'd expect this sort of stupidity in a country that has the luxury of indulging fat-and-happy bureaucracy, but not so much in a tiny country surrounded by a sea of people who want them all dead.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    1. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are dumb right-wing religious assholes.... what else can you expect?

  171. Not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't want people to question legal and competent orders. Whitness Hugh Thompson. There are of course other examples new and old, but I like this one.

    What they do is an interesting, and pretty clever. They set the rules in opposition in such a way as to leverage the advantages of the culture to enhance the doctrine of manuver warfare. Some of that has disadvantages. Notice in Abu Grabe that you had people who formed their little groups, and people who dissented and got the information out. And the inventiveness with which they pursued their ends in that goofy little community. Well,... that's self evident. Naked Iraqi pyramids just wouldn't have occured to me. That said, it's not so unbelievable. Everyone knows the story of the Berkley experiment involving grad students as prison guards and prisoners. In a way, it just reminds how dark nearly all of us are deep down inside where the lizard lives. We would expect roughly 4% of all POW's under control of US forces to have that kind of experience historically speaking. Which is actually pretty good, historically speaking. Again, it's just one of the many things that could have been prevented by better planning, but on some level, was always inevitable.

    1. Re:Not true. by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 1

      Stanford.

      --
      The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
  172. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by drxenos · · Score: 2, Informative

    AD&D wasn't just another book. It was an entire line of rulebooks. AD&D was derived from D&D, but had more complicated rules and options. The main different I remember is that in D&D character races were also classes (you played an Elf class). With AD&D, the were separate (You could play an Elf whose is of the fighter class). When WoTC bought TSR and created the 3rd edition, they dropped the advanced from the name. I have pretty much every rulebook since the original "whitebox" and can readily see firsthand D&D's changes throughout the years.

    --


    Anonymous Cowards suck.
  173. Jordan != Palestine by DrunkClam · · Score: 0

    Palestine == Palestine. Palestinian land was occupied and settled by the Israelies after the '67 war inspite of international law. Add to that that the IDF doesn't allow Palestinians free travel in their OWN country, that they want to the Palestinians to give up arable land for waste dumps and you see how the indiginous Palestinians get shafted by Israeli settlers.

  174. Ah ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like there is a good career for you in the US Army, son!

  175. I think soap is the real issue here... by Cheirdal · · Score: 1

    Anyone that has walked into a gaming shop where there were multiple gamers knows the gamer stench. Unwashed, greasy teenagers are easier for the enemies to detect and that detracts from their soldiering.

  176. Is there another side to this? by thrashor · · Score: 1

    Maybe getting turned down for military service or being religated to a low clearance desk job is not such a bad thing?

    --
    i just want to play go
    1. Re:Is there another side to this? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      no, they mean low clearance as in a front-line grunt, high-clearence means more important work in a nice building.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Is there another side to this? by thrashor · · Score: 1

      Ah! I have a colleague who never tells anyone that he plays RPGs on a weekly basis, as he is worried that it will impact his career progression. Maybe he is onto something?

      --
      i just want to play go
    3. Re:Is there another side to this? by dick+johnson · · Score: 1

      Hardly.

      Do you think American Delta Force soldiers, Green Berets, Seals or Rangers have desk jobs? You can get in ANY of those units without at least a Secret Security clearance.

      I would hardly suggest that any of those folks are manning desks.

      --
      - dj
    4. Re:Is there another side to this? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      No it means high clearance people have a _choice_ of going into a special team or a desk job, while low clearance people have less choice.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    5. Re:Is there another side to this? by dick+johnson · · Score: 1

      Actually, it doesn't.

      Not to go into specific detail. But I know a little something about this subject. Most folks who apply to get into these units have little choice in whether they are actually accepted and able to serve with these units.

      The Rangers, for example, have something like a 80 percent washout rate for the three Active Duty Ranger Battalions. In other words, for every 10 men who apply to serve with an Army Ranger Battalion, only two of those folks will actually be in a Ranger unit 12 months down the road.

      Getting a high security clearance has little to do with how 'smart' someone is. Basically, you need to have a clean criminal record, no unpaid debts and not have a history of cavorting with known criminals and terrorists.

      Yes you have to be intelligent to be able to serve in one of these units. But you also have to be pretty physically tough. I know lots of folks who fit the first bill (being smart). But not many who are smart and tough. Hence, the high washout rate.

      --
      - dj
  177. Don't worry - it's spread more... by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    I've seen the same thing. In fact, me and my girlfriend were having a conversation about this last night, but not about D&D. Her sister's kids are really into pokemon. They've memorized extensive lists of monsters, their abilities and stats, and how they compare to each other. They make up their own pokemon-like games spontaneously.

    The core mechanics and memes of roleplaying games have exploded in popularity among kids these days, just in a different more socially acceptable form. I can't prove it, but I think it'll have a great effect on the intellectual developments of kids. They're motivated, by the competition of playing the game and the cooperation/competition of trading cards, to learn new skills such as memorizing many statistics and relationships, assessing the strength of an opponent, predicting the outcome of a confrontation/interaction, assesing the trustability of a trading partner, building trust relationships, basics of a barter economy... The list goes on!

    And it's all the child of D&D.

  178. Exactly what aspects do they disagree with by darth_borehd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder what it is about D&D they object to. Is it the fantasy aspects of it? What about roleplayers who the Star Wars RPG or a modern based RPG like Spycraft? Are they in the same group? Also, do they object to the time and devotion given to the game or the fact they are playing an imaginary character? If so, what about all-strategy games like Warhammer? It would seem to me that wargamers might actually be looked upon favorably in the military due their familiarity with strategy.

    1. Re:Exactly what aspects do they disagree with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the correlation; People whose minds lead them to the need for this kind of diversion, tend to be the same kinds of people who aren't single-mindedly devoted to killing Arabs.

  179. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by bluprint · · Score: 1

    It's been a while. The last I played was the AD&D 3rd edition. I had no idea they reverted the name back to plain old D&D.

    Wasn't there, in one of the earlier rule sets of D&D, a series of rule books like "Basic", "Medium", "Advanced"? I seem to remember the first one was Basic, and I also seem to remember the advanced book, there may have been more than one in between.

    In any case, I thought that the way D&D was set up a while back, was that there was a series of rule books, each book covering the character development rules for a set of levels, like "Basic" might have been for levels 1-6 or 1-10, something like that, then after that level you used a different book in the series to define the character development/progress.

    Maybe I'm just making that up...but I'm pretty sure I remember it being set up something like that when I started playing in the med to late 80's.

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
  180. bit of nitpicking by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    first, rpg is russian for ruchnoy protivotankovy granatomet - portable antitank-grenade launcher. such things are called bazookas in usa, as far as i know.

    second, do you really think, palestinian villages own tanks? because shaped charges are only used for penetrating armor, they are practically useless against people.

    --
    Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    1. Re:bit of nitpicking by drxenos · · Score: 1

      Well, no, they are called RPGs in the USA: rocket propelled grenades.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
  181. Loophole!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you know the truth and don't act on it before the Rapture, you have no chance.

    So, ignorance is bliss!

  182. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by drxenos · · Score: 1

    Ah, I see your confusion now. Yes, there were boxed sets like that (there were 5--Basic, intermediate, expert, master, and immortal I like was the progression). They were all D&D. But I can see your confusion think the progression led to advanced. It doesn't.

    --


    Anonymous Cowards suck.
  183. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by bluprint · · Score: 1

    Just did some googling (since I couldn't find my DM/Players guide right now), the last rule set I played with (and own the books for) was AD&D 2nd edition, I've been saying 3rd ed., but that was incorrect

    Also read up more, and I guess we were playing with the D&D books after the split occured where you had Basic and Expert, as opposed to the AD&D set. I guess I've just gotten that confused with the word "advanced", thinking that "advanced" was another of those books in the Basic/Expert series.

    http://www.lyberty.com/encyc/articles/d_and_d.html

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
  184. Make sure you know what you're talking about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, most of those crazy settlers did serve in the army. They hang around with weapons given to them by the IDF for self defence and they take (too) active part in the defence of their towns (we call them by a different name in Hebrew, but the contempt does not translate well).

    They also control a lot of the army. They are now what the Kibutz and Labour people used to be when Israel was established - the idealistic crowd that carries the load. More and more of the officers in the IDF are thir dudes.

    That said, I've been a field-inteligence officer in the IDF, and have played D&D for years as a child. I didn't tell it to my recruiters, but it wouldn't have mattered back then - some other military-head (again, the contempt in the word 'Falafel' does not translate right) was in command.

    Lastly, I don't have a Slashdot account, so my name is Yosef.

    1. Re:Make sure you know what you're talking about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in the 3rd cavalry in the army, spent 14 months in Iraq, fought in many cities, the worst being Najaf, and I feel that the majority of D&D kids are harmless, HOWEVER, I would not want a majority of the D&D kids I see day in and day out at college in my squad. I'm not trying to offend anyone, and I'm sure there are players out their who don't fall into the category that I see at school...but the one's I SEE, i highly doubt they'd even make it through basic. I really don't have to worry because most of them are too lazy to do anything other than watch anime' and eat doritos, but I guess as long as they aren't in magical fantasy land on a day to day basis, and can do their jobs, be personable, and don't upset the moral of the soldiers around them, then let em' roll.
      When I was in highschool the kids that played D&D didn't dress, act, or look a whole lot different from a every other kid, but since I've gone back to school I've seen things have changed with the younger generation. The kids I see look upset, weak, and anti-social to put it mildly. And all 3 of those things will work real hard against you in the military, from the Air-Force to the Marines, soldiers have to be "On the level."
      My name is Jaren, and I'm an army of one hahaha

    2. Re:Make sure you know what you're talking about. by mcb · · Score: 1

      My group was similar to yours in high school... everyone was pretty normal. I think the difference is, at college, the only people you know who play D&D are the weirdos who do it in public or talk about it all the time.

  185. Automatic Low Security Clearance? by torklugnutz · · Score: 1

    God, they should at least give them a d20 to roll with to decide security clearance.

    --
    Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
  186. Call of Cthulhu by east+coast · · Score: 1

    Just wait till this schmuck runs in to the Call of Cthulhu fans. He's going to have a real fun time with that.

    But, who knows, if you give him to us for a few days in a sound proof room he might come out agreeing with us... nevermind the bruises and cuts (and the odd way he twitches), please.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:Call of Cthulhu by dclydew · · Score: 1

      Muhahahahaha....

      No Sir, That's a Dark Young of Shurb-Niggurath, Sir. What was that Sir? Yes, Sir, those are 20 foot tentacles. Yes Sir, this would be a good time for you to roll for sanity.

      No, you failed... sorry Sir.

      --
      Get a life, not a lifestyle. - Hikem Bey
  187. I was going to make a comment... by Admiral+Justin · · Score: 1

    Clear, concise, and full of factual information and such.

    But I failed my Charisma check.

    Sorry guys, you miss out on some great writing.

    --
    You will be baked, and there will be cake.
  188. IDF has the right of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll just say it straight a lot of D&D players have flake tendancies.

    people who play D&D esp the hardcore types tend towards flakiness.

    I don't understand why people are clamouring about getting so deep in the arm as it is. I mean you join .. you do your thing you leave when you can.

  189. Great by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Now anyone who complains about this will be labeled an antisemite.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  190. D&Ders are emotionally unstable & mental c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and in other news the sky is blue.

    You nerds can't get pussy now you can get Navy ass either!!!

  191. Evolution in action :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being in the military in Israel is risky. Low security often means less important, low risk jobs. Ergo, Israel are breeding more rpgers.

  192. Re:Poses some interesting questions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You left Arafat off of your list of monsters...

  193. Discrimination by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    I do not mean to cast aspersions on D and D players, but if IDF says that people who indulge in fantasy games, as a statistical group, have personality traits that make them a lower security risk, then I am inclined to believe them.

    If you look at the ratio of black people in the US prison system to whites, and compare that to the ratio in the general population, you might say that African-Americans are more prone to crime, and thus shouldn't be trusted. How is one statement any less Predjudice than the other?

    Oh, and since you post to Slashdot, you don't mind if the police search your house for pirated software, since slashdot posters are more prone to participate in piracy, do you?

    "I am an equal oppurtunity cynic, I hate everyone equally"

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  194. Amusing if true, given my clearance by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Me and a bunch of friends were some of the original game add-on designers at SFU for AD&D (heck, I've still got stuff that Gary Gygax signed, and a bunch of the original versions of the books), and I ended up holding a SECRET clearance in the Canadian Armed Forces.

    I suggest that this stunt will result in a 1D4 roll for self-inflicted damage to the Isreali Army, as RPG players are frequently better able to compartmentalize information learned with a higher classification and only release that which is appropriate, as well as how to deal with semi-conflicting rules sets to preserve the intention of security.

    But, hey, what do I know - I was only Acting Security Officer for the whole Pacific Region ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  195. Actually, that Jack Chick comic convinced me... by TheGuano · · Score: 1

    D&D I can do without. Diablo RPG? OK, similar subject matter, satan's in the title, fine. But is it unChristian to futuristic role playing games like Warhammer? I know now that Magic is bad, but what about Pokemon? Oh god. Please don't say WoW is off limits! I WOULD JUST HANG MYSELF.

  196. Chaotics of the world, don't unite! by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    The military would certainly reject me on the grounds that I am Chaotic Evil, and just as likely to fire on my comrades as the enemy --- discriminating bastards.

    Chaotic neutral is the best alingment to be. I might shoot an enemy. I might throw a greande into a friend's tent. I might help an nun cross a busy street. I might quit the army to become a nun. Who knows? I sure as hell don't. It will be as much as a suprise to me as everyone else...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  197. In Related News... by sgt_getraer · · Score: 1

    Recruits who are fans of 'Ozzy' Osbourne are automatically given low security clearance as well, while those who enjoy the "Heavy Metal" band Judas Priest are automatically put on suicide watch.

    Where is the Israeli army getting their youth culture intelligence... 1982?

  198. Everyone needs their head examined. by dclydew · · Score: 1

    It would appear to me that the Israeli army isn't saying "All D&D players are X and shouldn't be given clearance". It does semm that they are saying "If you fail this psychological check, then we're not letting you near sensitive stuff."

    I've been a gamer for a long, long time. Vampire, Mage, Werewolf, D&D, Call of Cthulhu and Cthulhu Live, even some old Grups. Honestly, I have to say that , to me, sombunal gamers shouldn't be near any weapons... ever.

    RPG's and LARPS attract intelligent, quick witted, imaginative and resourcful people. That makes up about 20% of most gamers. Gaming also attracts the socialy inept, the clinically depressed, boarderline psychopaths, and a host of rather odd people. Of course, those same sets of people also play online games, card games, etc etc etc.

    The Israeli army isn't doing itself any favors by focusing on D&D, they'd be much better off getting everyone's head examined (Dear Gods, they need their heads examined for actually permitting the government to have a mandatory draft to begin with.)

    Ratatosk, Squirrel of Discord
    Chatterer of the Words of Eris
    Muncher of The ChaoAcorn
    POEE of The Great Googlie-Mooglie Cabal

    I'm not detached from reality, I'm just customizing it.

    --
    Get a life, not a lifestyle. - Hikem Bey
  199. Um, they're Jews by randomErr · · Score: 1

    Hey guys,

    It's part of their religion. They see D&D as one of the highest forms of witchcraft. Read the first five chapter of Christian bible, the laws of Moses:

    Exodus 20:3-5 Thou shalt have no other gods before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness [of any thing] that [is] in heaven above, or that [is] in the earth beneath, or that [is] in the water under the earth: thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God [am] a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth [generation] of them that hate me.(The Ten Commandments)
    Exodus 22:18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
    Deuteronomy 18:10-11 There shall not be found among you [any one] that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, [or] that useth divination, [or] an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.

    Beyond the Book of Law there is:
    1 Samuel 15:23 For rebellion [is as] the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness [is as] iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from [being] king.
    2 Chronicles 33:6 And he caused his children to pass through the fire in the valley of the son of Hinnom: also he observed times, and used enchantments, and used witchcraft, and dealt with a familiar spirit, and with wizards: he wrought much evil in the sight of the LORD, to provoke him to anger.

    Before you start piling on, why not at least understand their mindset.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Um, they're Jews by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I can find plenty of things in the Holy Stone Tablets of Moradin that contradict all those quotations.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:Um, they're Jews by east+coast · · Score: 1

      They see D&D as one of the highest forms of witchcraft.

      Highest form of witchcraft? Damn, i've been getting ripped off.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  200. um... lower security risk?? by jxyama · · Score: 1

    you do realize "lower security risk" would merit higher security clearance? i think you meant to say "lower security clearance," like in the summary.

  201. D&D by charlie763 · · Score: 1

    Was anyone else readig the cartoon and waiting for the erotica to begin?

    --
    Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
  202. IDF doesn't have smart people working for them ... by bergwitz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After all, these people have some of the best clinical and occupational psychologists in the world working for them.

    Really? Doesn't seem so to me. Some possible theories why the IDF is skeptical of roleplayers (TFA says D&D, but seem to refer to RPGs and LARPs in general):

    - RPGs do have a bad image due to some Christian fundamentalists spreading FUD. The same Christians are avid supporters of Israel and Zionism so maybe the IDF actually believed these guys.

    - there's a higher percentage of left-leaning among roleplayers than among the general population. This may also be the case in Israel. Beeing a roleplayer thus makes you more likely to be exposed to leftists. This is indeed a security issue.

    - roleplayers are more individualistic and creative and thus less likely to accept orders without questioning.

    - the IDF are prejudiced. Psychologists have a tendency to view everything trough psychologist-glasses. This makes "escapism" a bad thing.

    - some idiot deceided this some years ago and nobody has corrected it since due to hiearchy issues.

    - the IDF are idiots

    Probably a combination of some of the above.

    --
    Evolution is just a scientific theory. Creationism is not.
  203. Clarification by ovanklot · · Score: 1

    Just so it's clear, the article is talking about RD&D (the kind you play fully costumed) and not D&D (the kind you play with paper and dice).

    --
    "Programming is life, the rest is mere details"
  204. Yeehah, slashdot Jack Chick! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Maybe now he'll do one of those tract comix on how reading Slashdot will send you straight to Hell! I can see it now: "Satan has mod points"

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  205. The Israeli army missed a few... by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    They should also include players of Evercrack and the Sims.

    -ted

  206. Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just what the Iraqis used to think.

  207. Makes you Think by SumDog · · Score: 1

    I've read some of the comments and aparently there were some mistranslations. Anyway, after a psychoogical evaluation, many of these people who play a game similar to D&D (not D&D itself) are given low security clearance cause they don't have a clear sense of reality.

    Now think about all those RPG players in your dorm rooms. I'm not sure about you guys, but I knew quite a few who were in the lobby playng EVERY NIGHT and they never took a shower. Man they smelled bad.

    Not all RPG players were like that, but there was a good percentile that really did have troulbe escaping that fantasy world.

  208. fp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, in one of my pre-recruitment interviews I told the interviewer that I read Slashdot and he was enthusiastic because he did too. :)

    During the interview, did you cut the interviewer off with a "Frist Psot!"? That would be pretty funny, in an annoying sort of way.

  209. Beware eating the uncloven fish! by BayBlade · · Score: 1

    Better you stick to the cloven chicken. Err. Umm. I mean... Hmm.
    What's cloven?
    Oh I know! Pig! Stick to pig! That's kosher!

    Sarcasm aside, goats really are kosher.

    --

    The key difference between a Programmer and a Senior Programmer is that one of them is Mexican.

    1. Re:Beware eating the uncloven fish! by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      I once walked into a Kosher deli and asked for a Ham & Cheese sandwich. They just gave me a funny look when I questioned why they couldn't make it.

      Things changed now - that same Deli is still run by the family but they will now serve me my ham and cheese (or roast beef & cheddar).

    2. Re:Beware eating the uncloven fish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Puto gringo!

  210. You hit a home run, my brother! by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    OK, maybe creative type people aren't so grounded in reality, but religious wackos are way, WAY worse. Take a look at most of the problems in the world today - almost all of them are caused, or made worse, by religious fanaticism.

    -ted

  211. I'd vote with the fundamentalist Christians by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    I dunno, talk to members of the Jewish diaspora that aren't Orthodox and are under 60, and you'd be shocked at the utter lack of support for the state of Israel. It is definitely higher than the atheists that they share their other political beliefs with, but it isn't that pro-Israel...

    The American "Christian Zionists" seem to be much more pro-Israel than any other group...

    Not happy about it, just observing it...

    Alex

    1. Re:I'd vote with the fundamentalist Christians by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Temper that down to "aren't Conservative and are under the age of 60" and I'd agree with you. Conservative, meaning not Reform, not politically.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:I'd vote with the fundamentalist Christians by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Christian crazies are the main reason the Republican party supports Israel. Jews are the main reason why the Democrats support Israel.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  212. The lesson from this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is don't lose wars.

    1. Re:The lesson from this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especally not ones you start.

  213. Not automatic by slasho81 · · Score: 2, Informative

    As for the IDF automatically lowering RPG-ers security clearances,

    RTFA. The IDF does not automatically lowers the security clearance of recruits who proclaim they play D&D. These recruits are sent to a psychological evaluation. More than half of these are found to have psychological traits that are not wanted in high security clearance positions.

  214. 'Let he who has the d20, cast the first stone' by TiggertheMad · · Score: 0

    Interesting line of though: Lets start spreading counter propaganda supporting RPGs...

    Crisitianity: Multiple crusades into the middle east to purge the 'heathens' from the holy land.
    Dungeons and Dragons: Multiple crusades to AM/PM to get fresh bags of 'Cheetos'.

    Crisitianity: The Inquisition, where thousands of innocent people were rounded up to be tortured and killed in faux witch hunts.
    Dungeons and Dragons: Alingment quizes, where thousands of hours were wasted discussing the phillosophical ramifications about wither Han Solo was Chaotic Good or Chaotic Neutral.

    Crisitianity: Failed to take a moral stand against the actions of the Nazi party as they killed millions of Jews.
    Dungeons and Dragons: Failed to take a stand againts gamers who don't bathe enough. No Jews have died to date, however one Saul Rosenberg of South Beach Florida once had to stand in a small elevator for four and a half minutes with a smelly gamer.

    Crisitianity: Failed to take a strong stand against sexual crimes performed by Catholic priests for decades, often involving children.
    Dungeons and Dragons: Failed to take a strong stand aginst childish sexual antics during post adventure drinking binges where the 'dwarf tries to pat the serving wench on the bum.'

    While neither group is perfect, I think that this proves, scientifically and without any shaddow of a doubt, that Cristians are clearly morally inferrior to Gamers. QED.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  215. Well duh by retro128 · · Score: 1

    Would you really want THESE guys in charge of national security?

    --
    -R
  216. Testament by festers · · Score: 1

    If they were playing Testament instead of just straight D&D, I'm sure they wouldn't be running into any problems. :)

    --


    -------
    "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
  217. Hmmm by Matt+The+Sheep · · Score: 1

    "...and labels them problematic in regard to their draft status." So if you want to draft dodge, make sure you come to your interview in tinfoil armour, tell your recruiter that you play 46 hours of D&D a week, your real name is Bjorn Stronginthearm, and roll the dice before you answer any of their questions.

  218. Don't Pigs have cloven hooves? by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    Well, don't they, unless i don't know what cloven means, I aasume they would never eat horses????

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:Don't Pigs have cloven hooves? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      Cloven means split. Kosher animals other than birds and fish, which have different rules must have split hooves, and chew the cud(are herbivores like cattle, sheep , and goats). Pigs have split hooves, but don't chew the cud. That is why pork isn't kosher. Horses and donkeys are herbivores, but don't have split hooves, so they aren't kosher.

      --
      How ya like dat?
  219. yay swiss rolls! by lycium · · Score: 1

    swiss rolls rock, especially if you're a student with a sweet tooth ;)

  220. FMJ by mickyflynn · · Score: 1

    "The marine corps doesn't want mindless drones who cant think for themselves. the marine corps wants killers." -- Full Metal Jacket.

  221. This reminds me by ReeferCpe · · Score: 1

    Lightning Bolt Lightning Bolt Lightning Bolt!!!!!

  222. Damn, I didn't get invited to join a coven... by guidryp · · Score: 1

    Geez if people actually believed this strip I would think it would make them want to play more DnD. DnD as training to be a real witch and get magic powers. Sign me up!. Scary last frame with the "good guys" at the bonfire.

    I miss playing AD&D. I would still play if life didn't get in the way. Have to settle for the occaisional CRPG binge now and then.

  223. Re:I still don't get the min/max thing... by lymph · · Score: 1

    I thought the idea was to put your highest score in the spot where it'll benefit your class most (i.e. 18 goes to CHA for a sorcerer). That way your character is above average, which is what a charater is supposed to be anyway. That's why they adventure and not farm. I have a half-elf sorceress w/STR 10 CHA 18, which means she's really hot, but has average strength (for an adventurer, not a housewife) is that MIN/MAX'ing? Are you supposed to place the abilities in the order you roll them? Cause there's like 3-4 different ways to roll out a char in the DM guide. (I'm gonna get so flamed for this post)

  224. Weak Personality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But my dwarven cleric never misses his will save!!

  225. In other news by daVinci1980 · · Score: 1

    In other news, women frown on D&D, by disallowing players access to their sensitive areas...

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
  226. Getting a security clearance is a little strange by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
    Kinda reminds me of this line from the end of "Alice's Restaurant"
    I went over to the sargent, said, "Sargeant, you got a lot a damn gall to ask me if I've rehabilitated myself, I mean, I mean, I mean that just, I'm sittin' here on the bench, I mean I'm sittin here on the Group W bench 'cause you want to know if I'm moral enough join the army, burn women, kids, houses and villages after bein' a litterbug?" He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send you fingerprints off to Washington."
    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
  227. But the advantage ... by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1

    ... of having the right D&D player as a solider is that he'll only take half damage if he's shot!

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    1. Re:But the advantage ... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Rules lawyer!

      *lol*

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  228. Re-read your dogma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, that's what you said, and it's dead wrong. The kashrut are far more complex than you portray. A properly slain chicken, for example, (if properly raised and properly prepared) is kosher.

    Chickens are neither vegetables, minerals, or blue-green algae, THEREFORE THEY ARE ANIMALS. And THEY DO NOT HAVE CLOVEN HOOVES.

    Doofus.

    1. Re:Re-read your dogma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the jewish-hebrew meaning of the word, fowl are not considered animals, and fall in a different category.

    2. Re:Re-read your dogma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yup, that's what you said, and it's dead wrong.
      Nope, he didn't even say that. He may have thought it, but what he wrote is there to see: "if we didn't eat cloven hooves we'd be vegetarian". Which is total bollocks.
    3. Re:Re-read your dogma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In the jewish-hebrew meaning of the word, fowl are not considered animals, and fall in a different category.
      And I was supposed to know that the AC who posted the original "it's cloven hooves or lentils and tofu" statement was using the words in that context? It's not as if I could see his cock or anything.
  229. Re:You're right. But wrong. by wronski · · Score: 1

    Much (but not all) of the 'shut up and blindly follow any orders' attitude on the part of the Red Army came from the political imperative of keeping down the only force that could conceivably threaten the power of the communist party. Hence the political officers, who could on occasion overrule the regular officers.

    After the initial shock of the invasion the soldiers in the red army became very effective, parlty because in the desperate times with national survival at stake some of the totalitarian bullshit was swept aside. The political officers lost their primacy, for instance, during the 1942 nazi offensive, IIRC. And the individual soldiers either learned to think on their own, or got killed.

    It got to a point that, when the war was nearly over, Stalin was quite alarmed (the red army and its commanders, e.g., Zhukov*, being very and deservingly popular), and moved quickly to reassert the political control over the army.


    ____________________
    * All postwar soviet leaders felt threatned by Zhukov`s popularity. After the war he was sent to a far-off command where he could pose no threat to Stalin. he was briefly back in the center of power under Khrushchev, before being kicked out of the central comitee. He made one last public apearence with Brejhnev. The response was so overwhelming (people were clapping and banging on the table, yelling his name) he was sent back to retirement almost imediatly.

  230. not sure it's a bad idea. by dynamo_mikey · · Score: 1

    I've played D&D or some other RPG (here in the US) most of my 31 years, and I for one think it's probably a good idea. I've known A LOT of creepy gamers of high school age aspiring to and then enlisting in the marines. These aren't stable people, they usually don't have a lot of friends, have some messed up social habits, and have a love for guns and weapons that quickly makes me uncomfortable. I can only guess at their motivation for military service, but I'm pretty confident it's not primarily to better ones character and earn money for college.

    Since the service in Israel is compulsory, I wonder if there is an statictically high rate of D&D players there that don't conform well to military service.

    I did know a lot of Israelis that played on MUDs.

    -dynamo

  231. Done and done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *sigh* No need to yell or call names.

    The laws of kashrut are operating under the assumption that chickens (and all birds), as well as fish (and several other submembers of the Kingdom Animalia), are to be considered as different creatures than the rest of the animals. Just like how some people who consider themselves vegetarian will still eat eggs, drink milk, and have chicken and fish.

    So, we can go into semantics all you want, but my original point (that we are limited to "animals" of cloven hoof) is still true (under a non-English, non-Darwinian definition of animal).

    1. Re:Done and done. by henrybrice · · Score: 1

      In fact, it isn't just about cloven hooves, they must have cloven hooves and be ruminants. Fish must have scales and fins (therefore catfish and sharks are out) and birds have a specific list... Insects are specific too, but very few people know exactly whet the names refer to, plus most people don't want to eat them anyway...

  232. US = Exact Opposite by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    The Defense Language Institute has without any doubt the highest concentration of role players (including, disturbingly, LARPers) of any place I have ever even HEARD of barring a gaming convention.

    These are people who, if pass, almost always get Top Secret clearances.

    The good news is: LARPers seem to be really good at failure.

  233. I played role playing games by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    I have problems associating with reality, see my profile (Space Pirate from 4096 AD). :)

    I played D&D, AD&D, Traveller, Marvel Super Heros, and a few others.

    I scored high on the ASVAB tests well within the top 8% of the scores. I went into US Army ROTC classes and almost enlisted in 1986-1987. College was too stressful for me, and my mental illness took over, and I withdrew. If it hadn't, I'd be in the Gulf War as an Officer.

    I held US Army Top Secret clearance when I worked as a Federal Contractor. I was able to do the job, though I did still suffer from the mental illnesses, I was not prone to violence or anything like that.

    I lost track of most of the people I played Role Playing Games with. A few are still my friends, and one was my best friend and the Game Master of many games we had. He killed himself in 1999, not over the game, but over real life situations he faced. He was deep in debt, divorced, his mother was dying of cancer, he lost his job, unemployment ran out, he couldn't find work, he became an alchaholic, etc. The only thing that kept him sane at times was playing RPGs.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  234. Actually.. by slashmojo · · Score: 2, Informative
    if you live in Israel and a Jew, you will end up in the army

    Actually you don't have to be jewish to get drafted into the israeli army, you just have to be an israeli citizen.. there are in fact besides jews also arabs, druze, bedouin, moslems, christians and even vietnamese in the israeli army!

  235. Of course, they're still going to hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the Christians seem' supportive of Israel now, don't think for a minute it is based on any perceived similarity or solidarity of beliefs. Probe a Christian long enough, and he'll tell you he still thinks all the Jews are going to hell for "killing Jesus".

    Current Christian support for Israel has more to do with an intense fear and/or hatred of Islam, and Israel is in the good guy slot purely by virtue of being not Islamic. If Islam were erased tomorrow, most of these kindly Christians would happilly restore the Warsaw ghettos.

    1. Re:Of course, they're still going to hell... by Swamii · · Score: 1

      Probe a Christian long enough, and he'll tell you he still thinks all the Jews are going to hell for "killing Jesus".

      An ignorant Christian perhaps, sadly that is true.

      However, any Christian who blames someone for killing Christ totally misunderstands the purpose of Christ: to die for our sins. It doesn't matter whether Romans or Jews killed him, because his purpose was to be the sacrifice Lamb. No more need for blood sacrifices when the perfect Passover lamb of God has sacrificed himself for us so that we can live.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    2. Re:Of course, they're still going to hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And at the same time they deny Roman culpability ... interesting.

      God killed Jesus. That was the plan all along. Jesus did not die at the hands of his own people in order to condemn them, rather precisely the opposite.

      I'll have to agree with Swamii, but it's very difficult to defend Christianity when other Christians are trying *so hard* to misrepresent it ...

    3. Re:Of course, they're still going to hell... by Swamii · · Score: 1

      That was the plan all along. Jesus did not die at the hands of his own people in order to condemn them, rather precisely the opposite.

      Well said. It's amazing yet sad so many Christians totally miss this crucial bit of their faith.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
  236. dude by geekoid · · Score: 1

    cooks get a Secret Clearence. not exactly hard to gte.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:dude by Simulant · · Score: 1

      True... but I wasn't a cook. I was in a Network Operations & Security Center. (you could hardly tell the difference some days)

      Personally, I think it's the IDF that has problems distinguishing fantasy from reality:

      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a /2 005/03/09/international/i121224S64.DTL

    2. Re:dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's the trade-secret recipes you can learn. Like Army-style mashed potatoes (hint: grenades are NOT involved). And Great-Grandma's Best Gravy Ever. And how to get just the right amount of sauce out of an MRE.

  237. Detached from reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "They're detached from reality and susceptible to influence," the army says.

    People who believe they're God's favorites and have a divine right to occupy a miserable little stretch of desert obviously have a problem with reality as well.

  238. In 18 months you will be dying by geekoid · · Score: 1

    in a desert to protect our freedoms from no one.

    You want to protect our freedoms? you want to do your share? become pollitically involved. Are most basic rights are underfire on capital hill right now.

    In a world where a teenager is arrested because he wrote a story about zombies invading a high school, radio people are being effectivly censored, the FCC fines people for being 'indecent' without a clear definition of what that is, where the fine for saying something some jackhole doesn't like is the same as illegal human experimentation, I think we have bigger problems against are freedooms then any terrorist could do.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  239. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by lgw · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it was confusing even at the time. There was also, in addition to the "Basic D&D" and "Advanced D&D" lines of books/boxed sets, a "D&D" book that was an introduction to either (it had a blue and white cover IIRC), and only covered through some low character level. This was after the original D&D "Greyhawk" books (pocket games format books), which followed the "Chainmail" book that started it all.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  240. A different perspective by sstidman · · Score: 1

    I found this interesting comment at the bottom of the article that puts a bit of a different perspective on the issue:


    20. Would you guys stick to the subject?

    I'd like to first ask you all to read the whole article. It specifically says "In a more active version of the game" (Namely, RD&D).

    Also, remember that you are reading a TRANSLATION! As someone who has read the article in Hebrew and English I can tell you that it's not a very good translation, either, as the Hebrew version mentions LARPing and RD&D specifically, with traditional D&D only mentioned as background on the game.

    As for the subject at hand, I happen to know some LARPers here in Israel (In fact, I think I may know the people interviewed here...) but haven't heard of any problems with the IDF thus far. Obviously the very thought is ridiculous, you can't just generally say "LARPers are a bunch of lunatics". I'd admit that many of them are, but no more than other people enlisting.

    Elad Droree , Ramat Hasharon, IL (03.09.05)

    --
    Send/track messages to 100K people: www.xPressAlert.com
  241. You forgot one by soft_guy · · Score: 1


    Insanity

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:You forgot one by Swamii · · Score: 1

      People can label me, call me names, insult me; it doesn't matter because through Jesus Christ I have freedom from the wrong things I've done. I can tell you that a guilt-free conscience is priceless, and no one can determine how much freedom from sin and addictions is worth; all the insults in the world cannot take away that happiness I've found because of Christ.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    2. Re:You forgot one by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      I love how the Christian crazies always claim that they are so persecuted for thier beliefs. Nevermind that they are vast majority of the US, the majority of the world's population, etc. I can't count the number of times some Chrstian crazy has told me that god is going to "strike me blind" or various other veiled threats because I don't go their church (cult).

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    3. Re:You forgot one by Swamii · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of ignorant people out there who call themselves Christians. No, God is not going to strike you blind; if he did that to all sinful people then we'd all be blind, including myself.

      Also, going to church doesn't make you a Christian. I haven't been to a church regularly in about 10 years because of similar people you mention.

      That said, I haven't thrown the baby out with the bathwater; while there is plenty wrong in the various Christian religions (see my blog), I still know that Jesus is the messiah.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
  242. SInce the majority by geekoid · · Score: 1

    of computer gamers are adult, his statment is kind of meaningless.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  243. Imagination is the enemy of atrocity by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    Not to single out the Israelis in this regard--apt students though they have proven--for the world round you will find that the security services are populated with a certain ideal: minds as flat as the desert, imaginations empty as spent shell casings.

    The ideal, of course, in the modern Western state is the bureaucratic killing mind. Somebody like Eichmann, who, as Hannah Arendt told us in Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, wept the day he was given the order to begin the destruction of German Jews...and then doggedly went to work. A touch of sentiment. The hankie. And then the killing work.

    We see much the same thing in Washington and Iraq now: bureaucratic detail men, the kind for whom the life and death of entire peoples are merely different standard forms to be filed accordingly, or as in the case of the uncounted Iraqi civilian dead who are their responsibility, corpses not even to be flattered with numbers. Thinking spoils slaughter. Dispassion gets it done.

    This is not to say that D&D is any guide to moral imagination. To the contrary: a fantasy life based on killing orcs might, given the right temperament and conditions, actually prove useful to some military applications. But D&D is a test of another essential quality, which is itself the enemy of the bureaucratic killing mind: you project your self into an Other, and that's the beginning of empathy. You inhabit another life, and you care for it. And you can't trust that impulse in the people to whom you assign the terrible work of colonialism.

  244. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by lgw · · Score: 1
    The geneology was:
    • Chainmail
    • The "D&D Boxed set" - 1974
    • The "Greyhawk" books (three small-format rules books) - 1975
    • "Advanced D&D" - 1977-79 for the core books
    • "D&D Basic Set" 2nd edition (only had rules for low-level characters) - 1978
    • "D&D Basic/Expert/..." Boxed set 3rd edition expanded the basic rules set into a seperate and paralled rules set alongside AD&D) - 1981-86
    • "Ravenloft" a dungeon module so successful it soawns the idea of "campaign settings" as a way to sell more rules books - 1983
    • "Unearthed Arcanum" the only rules expansion for AD&D (other than books of monsters) - 1985
    • "2nd Edition AD&D" core books published in 1989, but many more books published for the next 10 years
    • "3rd Edition D&D" the "A" was dropped, but this was the 3rd edition of AD&D, as opposed to the 1981 3rd edition of Basic D&D - 2000
    • "D&D v3.5" released in 2003

    Of course, many RPGers veered off into competing rules systems, or just rolled their own over the years.
    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  245. no by geekoid · · Score: 1

    that's being insane.

    Chaotic Neutral means you strive for neutrality outside of the law.

    Sure, you might shoot your own people, but not 'just because it might balance out something.'

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  246. D&D reject by humina · · Score: 1

    I really hope the US military rejects people that play D&D. That would be great. That way if there is a draft I can say "I play D&D" instead of lying and telling them I'm gay. Come on US military... D&D is EVIL. Paper + dice = worst soldiers ever.

    --
    check out the best blog ever:
    http://oehlberg.com
  247. In my communist D&D group... by donothingsuccessfull · · Score: 1

    ...we screen out members of the IDF.
    Probably redundant... I can't be bothered RTFComments

  248. Wait, so You Were in the POG? by DoubleZer08 · · Score: 0, Troll

    You were in an HQ unit, not a line unit. I don't put half as much credibility behind what you just said because you cited your Pencil Operations Group status.

    --
    Joseph Burlas Owner/Director, USA The Braxas Corporation
    1. Re:Wait, so You Were in the POG? by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 0

      WTF do you know? Mortars and snipers are attached to the headquarters unit in every ranger battalion. I'll just add that since there was always top brass walking down the hallways, these soldiers were held to an even higher standard than those in the line companies.

      I get your point tho, we also had cooks and clerks and intel guys attached to our company, who were definately not infantrymen, but I submit that they too were better infantry than your average airborne troop as well.

      Furthermore, the guy with the most confirmed kills in the Somalia battle of Mogadishu was a cook with vengeance in his heart and a M249 SAW in his hands. A superior (and friend) of mine was in intel, he lost a testicle there. He also did hand to hand training with men who competed in the Ultimate Fighting Championship and won. Why don't you ask a line infantryman what they think of soldiers from the HQ company.

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
  249. Re:the only thing in my hand during D&D is sod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In any case, I thought that the way D&D was set up a while back, was that there was a series of rule books, each book covering the character development rules for a set of levels, like "Basic" might have been for levels 1-6 or 1-10, something like that, then after that level you used a different book in the series to define the character development/progress.

    In the 1980s, D&D did have additional rule sets for higher level characters. But this was separate from AD&D.

    Please follow these links. They may jog your memory:
  250. So Do I by emoticon · · Score: 0

    Cause DnD Sucks

    --
    -Emoticon
  251. Re: Sig by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Dammit, why weren't you the PREVIEW button?

    I was, once. Talk about a shitty job...

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  252. D&D has smart players ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I do not mean to cast aspersions on D and D players, but if IDF says that people who indulge in fantasy games,

    I do not mean to cast aspersions on the IDF, but I suspect all the D&D players I knew in college (Stanford) are smarter than a bunch of policy-makers in the army.

    My guess is that some army guy just didn't want the IDF to be seen as a bunch of geeks.

  253. Oh well... by TheRealStubot · · Score: 1

    So much for the Tel Aviv Gencon next year...

    --
    "I'd rather win in an ugly car than lose in a pretty car" - Jari Lahdenpera
  254. Sounds like... by Watersharer · · Score: 1

    [quote]"It's not a game of winners and losers...but rather an entry into another world with stories and plot changes"[/quote]

    Sounds suspiciously like the Bush administration.

    --
    Only tyrants and oppressors need fear a well armed populace.
  255. A Note From an Israeli.. by ailaG · · Score: 0

    Who also served in the IDF.

    1. Don't give that much "weight" to that new law. Our army tends to be stupid and has many illogical rules that nobody really cares about.
    There's a rule, or at least everybody says there is one, that says that if you close the top button of your uniform's shirt, it means that you're suicidal. I'm not sure whether it's a real law or not, but hey - I wouldn't be surprised.
    Still, nobody really cares about that.

    2. Yes, as people mentioned, it's RD&D (LARP) , not all D&D. If they'd ban all D&D players then half (or more) of the people in the base I served in would have to turn their uniforms in and go home :)
    (and it's an important base)

    just FYI
    Galia

    or maybe "sergeant galia"?
    well, technically it's "staff sergeant galia", which is one level above sergeant, but that title sounds bad. oh well, i'm only sergeant if they call me in .. there's an arrangement here where your base can make you re-join for a couple of weeks each year after you've finished your service.
    but i'm a girl. they hardly bother to call us in.
    enough offtopic, me go now.

    --
    -= ailaG =-
  256. ROTFLMAO by ailaG · · Score: 0

    Our army has some of the best clinical etc... LOL, It's nice to know that we look that serious on the outside.

    Well, when I was about to join (it's mandatory, pretty much) they sent me to their "mental health dept." due to a small reason that is quite common. They almost didn't let me in because of that. It may be a very common issue, but everyone else knows that they should just lie about it, so the army thinks that it's a rare one.
    Well, I went in and some 19-year-old kid chatted with me a bit, then asked me if I wanted to commit suicide, I said no and they let me join.

    Same thing happened with my security clearance. "Do you drink?" "No." "Drugs?" "No." "Are you sure?" "Yes" "alright, you're in" (and I know of two people who used to take drugs, both got into the intelligence force)

    So please, don't count on the IDF for being smart or rational.
    Plus, if they ban D&D they'll miss out on many of the smart people, including those who are sent to college before their army service so that they could give better service. They all play D&D, almost.

    (as other posts say, the article referred to RD&D, not all D&D)

    --
    -= ailaG =-
  257. Oblig futurama by Fryboy · · Score: 1

    Somebody call a Doctor!
    This man is over-gasped!

  258. This story is COMPLETE CRAP by ExtraT · · Score: 1

    I'm an ex-IDF soldier, and I'm telling you this: This story is COMPLETE CRAP. There is no basis to it. If there were, half of Israeli soldiers would be the ones frowned upon. D&D is extremely popular in Israel (at least it was 8 years ago), and nobody makes a secret out of it - coz there is no need.

  259. its the 80s Satanic panic all over again!!!! run r by Robocoastie · · Score: 1

    run run for your lives Israelis! The 80's satanic panic has hit your shore somehow.

  260. Kill! Kill! Kill! by dkalley · · Score: 1


    "And friends, somewhere in Washington enshrined in some little folder, is a study in black and white of my fingerprints. And the only reason I'm singing you this song now is cause you may know somebody in a similar situation, or you may be in a similar situation, and if your in a situation like that there's only one thing you can do and that's walk into the shrink where ever you are, just walk in say 'Shrink, You can get anything you want, at Alice's restaurant.' And walk out."

    Couldn't resist following that up!

  261. HI BONCH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  262. Stupid Generalization by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

    If you've played D&D with enough people, you know that as a result of playing D&D with some people you're less likely to trust them with complex, difficult, important things.

    If you've ever inadvertently mentioned that you play D&D to people who match the "living in parents' basement" archetype, you know that some of the most visible D&D players in the world are not exactly discreet people who should be trusted with sensitive information.

    When I was growing up, the father of one of the neighborhood kids, who used to do (and maybe still does?) covert work and now mostly does high-level analysis, wargames, etc., for military intelligence would run a game for a bunch of us in the neighborhood. He created an incredibly detailed and self-consistent world, and adapted it on the fly to accomodate the most stupid and brilliantly clever things we tried to do within it to keep the experience engaging enough that we could play his campaign for months on end, with pre-adolescent to adolescent attention spans.

    Maybe these traits improve the likelyhood that someone could get away with doing something deceptive long enough to really do damage to a security-sensitive operation, but what is the cost of excluding them? Role-players, especially DMs and such, tend to be extremely good at working with scenarios that are untestable, which describes many security-sensitive operations. When you're preparing for a raid into hostile territory, something the IDF does a lot of, you need lots of people who can put themselves in that situation during the planning phase, and who can then think on their feet when the plan goes out the window the moment people start shooting.

    Sure, maybe these people have personalities less well suited for being gate guards at your secure facilities, but they have cultivated on their own time operational skills that would take years of training and experience to develop otherwise, and with the short careers typical in military service, that's not a viable option.

  263. Re:I think I've ascertained who you are. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "How appropriate, you fight like a cow!"

  264. Re:I still don't get the min/max thing... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

    Min Maxing is pretty much choosing everything about your character to maximize the positives and minimize the negatives.
    You start with stats then compare every class/race combo to see what gets you the best numbers for everything important in that combo without undully screwing anything else.
    Choosing where to put your 18 and where to put your 9 so it make sense for the 1/2 orc ranger you've decided to play is just using some brains.
    Also what you said about character is reminesent of one of the two big schools of thought on "HEROS" in rpgs and fiction.
    Is a hero someone who lived up to his heroic potential, or a normal person forced into situations that gave him the oportunity to become a hero.
    You can take the aproach that there's something about hero's that make them hero's or that the difference between your farmer and your hero is that the hero did something the farmer didn't or took an opourtunity the farmer could/would not.
    Is hero born to greatness, or doese he sieze it? Doese he meet his fate or make it?
    Not shure how to explain it clearly. Except through these sorts of questions and perspectives.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  265. Re:I still don't get the min/max thing... by lymph · · Score: 0
    Hmmmm...good postulation. Socrates made his fate, but was not born to greatness. Achilles was fated, but born to greatness. Both have been remebered for thousands of years, but which is the hero? Thought or action. Yin/Yang...

    Anyway, I've only played D&D 3rd edition 5 times...and never AD&D, 2nd edition, or 1st edition. I have a lot of the books (1st - 3rd edition - stuff from 1977 on...WTF is THAC0?) but have never had the opportunity to play much. The guys I knew when I was young wouldn't let me play, and the people I know now won't let me play either, no room in the quest and all. I know the PM and the DM almost by heart, but have never really played that much. So I'm not sure how people really play.

    I am just wondering what you mean by "choosing everything about your character to maximize the positives and minimize the negatives". Aren't you supposed to do that when assigning your ability scores anyway? Sorry if this is a redundant question.

    A geek among geeks but never one of them...odd john.

  266. Mother rapers, father stabbers. Father rapers! by wiredog · · Score: 1
    And the biggest meanest nastiest father raper of them all said "What'd ya get, kid?" "I got fined $50 and had to pick up the garbage" "What'd ya get arrested for" and I said "Litterin'"

    And they all moved away from me on the Group W bench.

  267. Re:You're right. But wrong. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    Much (but not all) of the 'shut up and blindly follow any orders' attitude on the part of the Red Army came from the political imperative of keeping down the only force that could conceivably threaten the power of the communist party. Hence the political officers, who could on occasion overrule the regular officers. After the initial shock of the invasion the soldiers in the red army became very effective, parlty because in the desperate times with national survival at stake some of the totalitarian bullshit was swept aside.

    Oh yes, naturally most of that bullcrap would get swept aside in real combat. Mostly what I'm getting at is that the Soviet training and doctrine, specifically that of the cold war era, almost without exception mandated the "smart head, dumb body" approach, as opposed to the US military's emphasis on "individual initiative". Even then it was indeed mostly a political maneuver intended to ensure that the military didn't "get any ideas" rather than a rational approach to conducting modern warfare.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  268. w00t by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Ah, someone to debate alignment with!

    A chaotic neutral is someone who values individuality and personal freedoms (chaotic) and has no bias toward good or evil. Since their morals aren't strongly alinged to good or evil, they might commit acts that fall under either catagory in the name of self-interest. Any impulsive or selfish personality could fall under this category. They have no desire to spread woe or promote the greater good, simply to be allowed to do whatever they wish.

    Now, someone who was mentally ill could certainly fit this patern, but there is a whole sub-topic of alingment and sanity. It could be argued that anything with a basically human mind that was chaotic evil would be homcidial and deranged. Many serial killers would certainly fit the category. However, I would say that the reason one acts out an alingment is moot in the discussion of what alingment a person is.

    You mention the phrase, 'striving for neutrality'. That sounds like a out of the book description of neutrality, which I don't buy. Nobody goes around saying, 'Hmmm, the forces of good are getting to strong, let's throw in with evil today'. I mean, really, how does one 'strive for neutrality' in the spectrum of good and evil?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  269. My reasons by superyooser · · Score: 1
    It's not just the rapture. Here are my "religious" (and there are many non-religious) reasons for supporting Israel:
    Genesis 12:1-3,7-8, 13:14-18, 15:7,18-21, 17:8, 35:10-12, Exodus 3:8, 6:4,8, Numbers 33:50-53,55-56, 34:1-12, Deuteronomy 1:8, 11:21,24,31, 17:14-15, 26:1-9, 30:3-7, 34:4, Joshua 21:43, 2 Chronicles 20:7, Psalms 105:9-12, 122:6, Isaiah 11:11-12, 40:1-2, 62:6-7, Jeremiah 25:5, 31:8-11, Ezekiel 37:11-14, Joel 3:18-21, Amos 9:14-15, Luke 1:54-55, Acts 7:5, Romans 4:13,16, 9:1-5, 11:17-28, Galatians 3:16-17
    You can look up some of those here, but don't try more than a few at a time.
  270. Thank you by superyooser · · Score: 1

    I'm always happy to see other Christians on here supporting Israel. You may want to follow my journal.

  271. Err... by TxdoHawk · · Score: 1

    I know the shot at him was just a joke, but I'd rather Jack Chick be locked in a closet. There's something even more frightening than him out there, people in power that are stupid enough to listen to him. Don't give him ideas.

  272. Re:I still don't get the min/max thing... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

    True min/maxing is not just making smart choices about assigning stats. It means the final numbers are ALL that matter, you don't care if it's a dwarven fighter or a elf druid or whatever. You don't pick any skills that don't 100% support a maxed out char or pick anything to make your character fully formed (as in no roll playing elements).
    The reality is everyone doese this to some small degree. It's obnoxious when it passes a certain threshold, that threshold varies from person to person. Think of it a line from totaly random (or totaly driven by concept/story) character to one who's creation is total driven by the final numbers. You should try to create a character with SOME versimilitude, some concept beyond really good fighter, or very powerfull mage.
    But my tolerance for min/maxing or stat crunching is fairly high, as long as the player is trying to create a character that's fun to play and not just trying to 'win' it's cool.
    THAC0 is To Hit Armor Class 0. Once apon a time (that phrase had to show up somewhere here:) lower armor classes were better, you started at 10 and anything that made it harder to hit you lowered this. Small shields were a -1 to ac and so on.
    Now each class had different starting odds on hitting an ac of 0 (middle of the range, which went from -10 to +10) that got better with level advancement, which also varied from class to class. Fighter classes generaly got better each level or nearly every level whereas mages were something like every 4 or 5 levels. Next you had to add in all the various modifiers, such as magic and exceptional stat bonuses. Once all these were added to gether you got what you needed to roll to hit an AC of 0, thus your calculated THAC0. since the number you needed to hit varied 1:1 with the targets AC this number and a single addition/subtraction told you what you needed to hit any particular critter 99% of the time. Whereas if you stopped and added everything up each time (gee I'm 17 strength that's +3 and my sword is +1 and....) it'd slow the game down durring battles to a borring crawl. When THAC0 was introduced it bassically codified and simplified what most players were already doing, prefiguring anything they could before play to speed up mechanics so they could focus on the fun.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  273. Really? You sure? by kikta · · Score: 1
    Why are you joining the Marines? If you think you're 'different' and 'very smart', then you're probably going to have a very difficult 4+ years....

    Hrm... aside from the fact that he never said that, I consider myself "different" and "very smart." And the Marine Corps made an officer out of me. I've been in over eight years (combining NROTC and active duty) and I'm very happy. In fact, I've thrived and I've seen others like me thrive time and again.

    So next time make sure you know what the hell you're talking about before you spout off. Thanks.
  274. Reference 1 by Muchsake · · Score: 1

    Why is slashdot linking to porn. Inocent minors might click that chick link.