Slashdot Mirror


Rave Reviews for Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger

druid_getafix writes "The first mass market reviews of Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger are trickling in with a big thumbs up for the release. Walt Mossberg of the WSJ says 'Tiger Leaps Out in Front' but complains about slowness of some applications - notably Mail. David Pogue of NYT says 'But with apologies to Mac-bashers everywhere, Spotlight changes everything. Tiger is the classiest version of Mac OS X ever and, by many measures, the most secure, stable and satisfying consumer operating system prowling the earth.' In related news Mossberg also covers the rising incidence of spam/virii in the Windows world and says '...consider dumping Windows altogether and switching to Apple's Macintosh...'. Previous reviews of Tiger were covered on /. earlier."

1,088 comments

  1. Test of the NYT article by zeux · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Text of the NYT article. Mod this one up, no karma whoring here.

    From Apple, a Tiger to Put in Your Mac

    IF anyone considers tomorrow a special day at all, it's probably because it's Friday, or because "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" movie opens, or because it's Uma Thurman's birthday.

    But for one particular group of 25 million computer owners, April 29 is a much bigger deal. It's the day Apple releases Mac OS X 10.4, nicknamed Tiger - the latest version of the software suite that makes up the Macintosh operating system.

    Ordinarily, of course, reading about operating systems is about as much fun as a seminar on tax policy. Very few people line up at 5 a.m. to be the first to upgrade the software in their microwaves, cellphones or cars.

    But Mac OS X has recently become interesting even to people outside the Cult of Macintosh. The more Microsoft Windows is bogged down by viruses, spyware and disruptive security updates, the more miserable life becomes - and the more the long-suffering Windows majority begins to investigate virus-free, spyware-free alternatives like Mac OS X.

    One nice thing about Windows, though, is that Microsoft sics a new version on its customers only once every few years. (Windows XP, for example, made its debut in 2001. The next version is scheduled for 2006.) Apple has asked its faithful followers to upgrade Mac OS X about every year, at $130 a pop (or free with a new Mac). What could Tiger offer that could justify yet another expenditure?

    Apple's Tiger Web site lists over 200 new features. Not all of them are, ahem, likely to set off a mass exodus to the Macintosh. Will anyone upgrade to Tiger because, for example, "you can easily find any glyph by typing its Unicode ID"?

    Still, there are a few humdingers in that list. The most important is Spotlight, which is like Google for your hard drive. As you type into the Spotlight box in your menu bar, a tidy menu instantly drops down. It lists every file, folder, program, e-mail message, address book or calendar entry, photograph, PDF document and even font that contains what you typed, regardless of its name or folder location. This isn't just a fast Find command. It's an enhancement that's so deep, convenient and powerful, it threatens to reduce the 20-year-old Mac/Windows system of nested folders to irrelevance. Why burrow around in folders when you can open any file or program with a couple of keystrokes?

    Out of the box, for example, tapping Command and the space bar highlights the Spotlight box. So if you hit Command-Space and type "Schw," the list shows every message Arnold Schwarzenegger sent to you by e-mail, every appointment you've got with him and, of course, his address book entry. It's all organized neatly by category; a quick click or keystroke opens the item you want.

    You can also save a Spotlight search as a "smart folder," a self-updating folder that always contains stuff that matches certain criteria - for example, all documents created in the last week containing the phrase "wombat mating habits."

    Unfortunately, Spotlight can't "see inside" many programs other than Apple's, although that will change as software companies upgrade their wares. For example, Spotlight can search the contents of Word, Excel and PowerPoint files, but doesn't yet see the messages in Microsoft's Entourage e-mail program.

    The second most heavily hyped Tiger feature is called Dashboard. It's a constellation of gorgeous miniprograms that appear or disappear en masse when you touch a selected key. They include real-time stock tickers, weather forecasts and airline flight information, along with a calculator, dictionary, Yellow Pages and other doodads. They're handy enough, and they appear with a dazzling rippling effect that turns your screen into the surface of a Zen pond. But Dashboard isn't a Tiger exclusive; the shareware program Konfabulator, available for Windows and older Mac OS versions, does pretty much the same thing.

    On the other hand, som

    1. Re:Test of the NYT article by Karellen+!-P · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I did find it tremendously annoying that the multimedia part of the article requires you to have Real or WMP but not Quicktime.

    2. Re:Test of the NYT article by kimba · · Score: 4, Informative

      David Pogue should disclose that he is a popular author of Apple books. I don't disagree with what he says, and I am an Apple fan, but if you have a major interest in Apple you should probably disclose it when writing neutral articles for the NYT.

    3. Re:Test of the NYT article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Should he also disclose that Apple recently kicked all of his books (as well as the rest of his publisher's books) out of their stores?
      If you're trying to invent a bias, you should mention a negative as well as positive influence too in the sake of 'neutrality'.... meh.

    4. Re:Test of the NYT article by Feoh · · Score: 1

      The point is that your operating system's search feature doesn't do what Spotlight (or for fans of Quicksilver which has been around for a good while did before it) does.

      If it were just a filesystem searcher, it wouldn't be getting hyped nearly so much, but the idea here is that for every program that collects data (It doesn't even have to use the filesystem for storage, either) a Spotlight search will pick it up.

      For example current search functions likely wouldn't search MS Office docs, because they're binary, while Spotlight would.

    5. Re:Test of the NYT article by martinX · · Score: 1

      He also writes books on opera (the annoying stuff, not the browser), magic and music. And Windows XP.

      And is a talented public speaker.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    6. Re:Test of the NYT article by kimba · · Score: 1

      So... his publisher Pogue Press is an imprint of O'Reilly. Since when is O'Reilly barred from Applestores?

    7. Re:Test of the NYT article by AnonymousCowheart · · Score: 1

      Likewise, I couldn't get mplayer to play it, but the linux version of real would play it.
      Here is the link:
      http://www.nytimes.com/video/src/2005/04/27/techno logy/highbandwidth/realmedia/20050427_pogue_VIDEO_ HI.rpm

    8. Re:Test of the NYT article by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IF anyone considers tomorrow a special day at all, it's probably because it's Friday, or because "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" movie opens, or because it's Uma Thurman's birthday.

      It's also the birthday of former Japanese Emperor Hirohito, now known as "Midori no Hi" or "Green Day" (no relation to the band). It's an important national holiday as it kicks off "Golden Week," which consists of three other national holidays including Japan's national day and Boy's Day. So, if you were thinking of visiting an Onsen or going to Izu Peninsula this week, you should rethink your plan. Those kinds of places will be really crowded but downtown Tokyo should be nearly vacant. Except, of course, the crowd that should be gathering around the Apple Store in Ginza.

      Just in case you were interested.

    9. Re:Test of the NYT article by Momoru · · Score: 0, Troll

      I do agree with the article that Mac's updates are a little pricey. What are essentially small enhancements and bug fixes get sold as an all new operating system. If you started with just OS X 10.0, you've had to spend almost $500 just to get to this point. I would rather Apple wait for an OS upgrade every 2 years or so with major differences, and roll the small stuff like a new desktop search to us free.

    10. Re:Test of the NYT article by word+munger · · Score: 1

      I would prefer they just give us every upgrade for free!! Wouldn't that be cool? Seriously, few people have actually spent that much money coming from 10.0, because nearly everyone has upgraded their computer during that time frame, and the new OS came free. Personally I think I only paid full price for one upgrade -- Jaguar. If I buy Tiger, that will be two, but I haven't decided whether it's worth it. Spotlight seems nice, but I've got my HD pretty well organized anyway, so I may not need to bother.

    11. Re:Test of the NYT article by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      And if you started with Windows 2000 you'd be paying around as much (~500 USD) as OSX unless you're smart and get an OEM version or try upgrading. And with OSX you can install the OS on up to (I believe) 5 computers legally, unlike Windows XP which forces you to buy a new copy for each one.

      Each release has more to it than one feature, it's just that in this case Spotlight and a few other small ones are just the big noticeable ones. Kind of like Windows XP's GUI and wireless support were the only "obvious" changes from 2000 (yet a lot of other stuff changed in the background).

      But I think Apple said that after Tiger they're going to slow down a bit.

    12. Re:Test of the NYT article by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This point has been run into the ground by now but I guess some people still don't get it. If you started with 10.0, you have to pay $130 to get to this point. No one is forced to upgrade. If you don't consider the enhancements being offered to be worth the cost, don't upgrade. Panther will work just as well tomorrow as it did yesterday.

    13. Re:Test of the NYT article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...current search functions likely wouldn't search MS Office docs...

      Bad example - the MS indexing service does search office formats. The idea behind this is correct though - Spotlight searches rule.

    14. Re:Test of the NYT article by Feoh · · Score: 1

      Point well taken. Thanks for noticing though that I was merely flailing for a binary format which wouldn't come up with a bog standard filesystem text search :)

      Other potentially better examples - mail in a SQL database that doesn't back-end to flat text? Description / keywords fields in various binary image formats, your IM 'buddies' list, etc.

    15. Re:Test of the NYT article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, who gives a shit? It's just one dumb proprietary format over another.

    16. Re:Test of the NYT article by pogueNYT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you're right. My "Macs for Dummies" book IS published by Wiley, and it WAS removed from all Apple stores this week. And yes, it's true, that I wrote a book on Mac OS X--and two of them on Windows XP (Home and Pro). --pogue

    17. Re:Test of the NYT article by Krioni · · Score: 1
      Wrong. Oh, I see you're modded "Troll." How about just dumb? Apple released a security update for 10.2.8 in January 2005, when it was over a year old:

      Security Update for 10.2.8

      Idiot.

      --
      Lose essential liberties to get temporary safety = get only hassles and security theater.
    18. Re:Test of the NYT article by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      So you created a slashdot user account...just so you could reply to a minor comment buried in a article containing a short review you did of Tiger.

      And not even to disagree with the comment, but affirm it.

      Wacky.

  2. Voice recognition by suso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the whole voice recognition without having to configure it for your voice is pretty slick. I want a Mac.

    1. Re:Voice recognition by zorander · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope. Their CPU sales went up 40% last year without you. They don't need you or your demographic to be successful. Premium price for a premium product. Besides, the mini isn't a real part of their product line (kind of out of place, imo). Start with the iMac and factor out the price of a 20" LCD and you'll find that things make a little bit more sense.

      As a geek, you want a beige box that you can plug into your existing system. Apple doesn't want people to be using apples that don't look like apples, ergo it's not going to make as much sense to do it that way.

    2. Re:Voice recognition by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh Christ, this old chestnut again. Take all the parts you bought for 0.5 a Mini and make it fit in a chassis 2 inches high, 6 inches wide and 6 inches deep. Yes, size counts. A Cappucino PC comes closest and costs much more than a Mini.

    3. Re:Voice recognition by Mikey-San · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As do I, but I really thing Apple need to do something about getting a cheap machine out. I can build my own for half the price of a Mac mini, and until they can match that they won't be getting any of my money, and I'm sticking with Windows.

      ROFLCOPTER. "Apple need to sell a cheap [$250] computer."

      An upgrade to Windows XP Professional is $200 alone. How much computer can you buy for that last $50? Sorry, but if you're going to complain that a $500 isn't cheap enough, I'm going to say you're a biased troll who thinks pirating an OS makes a computer cheaper for comparison purposes. You can't call something cheaper if you're stealing part of it.

      "Man, that $2000 PowerBook is too expensive. If they had a $1000 laptop, I'd buy one, but NOT SOONER NO OMG."

      "Man, that $1000 iBook is too expensive, but if they had a $700 Mac, I'd buy it. NOT SOONER, though!"

      "Man, that eMac isn't cheap enough for me. I can build my own computer for $10 and a pack of paper clips. Wake me when they sell an AFFORDABLE computer."

      "What? They're charging $500 for a computer?! Too bad they don't have a $250 computer, or I'd buy one."

      Pattern here?

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    4. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminder to microcomputer lamers: you are ASSEMBLING your own system, not building it, unless you build the processor.

    5. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1995? called and wants their os/2 warp back...

    6. Re:Voice recognition by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can only build a machine cheaper if your time is worthless.

      I need someone to do some yard work can I hire you for $1 a day? That is your going computer assembly rate. So it won't be much of a difference.

      You do reaize that in order to put even a nano-itx board into a mac mini chassis, you can't have a cd-rom drive right?

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    7. Re:Voice recognition by Holi · · Score: 1

      They had that in OS 9, I used to say things like "Computer launch browser." and up would pop IE. That is hardly innovation.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    8. Re:Voice recognition by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      I think the whole voice recognition without having to configure it for your voice is pretty slick. I want a Mac.

      The stuff in MacOS X Panther is great fun too - I've just switched it on for a laugh (System Preferences, Speech, Speech Recognition), and it works quite well.

      Although I just asked it to switch to Mail and it started iMovie instead. I'm not sure if it's faulty speech recognition or it's just trying to annoy me.

      "Computer, tell me a joke..."

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    9. Re:Voice recognition by boaworm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Apple is obviously not interested in competing with all this crap'n'cheap PC storese and hardware floating around. Why can't people figure that out ?

      Furthermore, I've actually spent less money on computer hardware since I bought my Power Mac, simply because I was suddenly so happy with it, and felt no need to constantly change stuff.

      I threw my last Windows/PC years ago, running Linux/OpenBSD on my servers, and OS X on laptops/workstation. I dont miss this fuzz about crappy drivers, PSUs that goes black, noice, having to install a shitload of free/shareware just to be able to do something.

      Simply put, I value my time, so I save money (and adrenaline) on my Mac's. If you dont mind all the crap that goes with cheap PC hardware, Apple is simply not for you, so dont "whine" about not being able to buy a cheap Mac.

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    10. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Remember, people ASSEMBLE houses, they don't build them, unless they grew the trees and forged the nails themselves.

    11. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An upgrade to Windows XP Professional is $200 alone.

      That's comparing apples to limos. The correct comparison is between OS X and Windows XP Home, which costs less than $80 if you shop around.

    12. Re:Voice recognition by neoform · · Score: 1, Funny

      Try saying this to it:

      "Let's recognize speech!"

      now, unless you properly enunciate every word, it might hear "Let's wreck a nice beach." ..

      speech recognition is nowhere near done yet.. ;)

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    13. Re:Voice recognition by schtum · · Score: 0, Troll

      I dont miss this fuzz about crappy drivers, PSUs that goes black, noice...

      No ice? Unix-based computers have built-in ice machines? Wow, I'm making the switch today!

    14. Re:Voice recognition by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I had that in OS/2 Warp v4 back in 96. Speech Recognition becanse available on windows around 97/98.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    15. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope. a well trained copy of IBM viavoice kicks the crap out of anything tiger has in it.

      Voice rec has not moved foreward cince 1984 when I built a VRec board for my KIM-1 from the schematics and articles in BYTE magazine.

      Ahh, when computer magazines were useful, computer users had a clue and things were fun .... now my only outlet is linux and BSD for the fun.

    16. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that a Mac Mini isn't just $500.

      (I'm in Canada, so prices are upsized here).

      I was just seriously looking into a Mac Mini, as my desktop just blew it's PSU and fried the motherboard.

      Mac Mini: $750 for the 80G model. Superdrive: $130. Third Party 1G SODIMM: $260. That's about $1175 for a useable Mac. And that's five year old technology, running on a 4800RPM laptop drive, and with only Firewire 400 (not 800) for external drives.

      I found I could upgrade to an Athlon 64 Shuttle box with 1G of ram and a 300G 7200 RPM SATA drive for less than the cost of a useful Mac Mini. (And before you go on about my time, Best Buy has a similarly equipped Shuttle box for $1150 on store shelves).

      But "that's not fair"? I already own leftover hardware from my other PC that died (DVD burner, modern video card) which would effectively be useless if I bought a Mini. One of the hidden costs of a Mac is that all of your existing PC hardware may as well be thrown out, as it's useless now.

      I appreciate that the Macs are cheaper now, but the Mac Mini is not as much of a bargain as it appears to be. Certainly not for what you get. I *wanted* to be able to justify the purchase of one, but it's simply too much money right now to get a useful system compared to a PC upgrade.

    17. Re:Voice recognition by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

      Yes, size counts.

      Not to me it doesn't.

      The problem is the lack of choice, sure the mini is great value for money compared to other small pc's, but I don't want a small PC.
      Stick a mac with the mini's specs in a beige box for half the price, and they would sell like crazy.

    18. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "An upgrade to Windows XP Professional is $200 alone."

      Yes the origional poster is an idiot but that line above suggests you caught a whiff of what it was smoking.

      Full version of Windows XP Professional is $12 Canadian. Heck free if you only want the bits and not physical media. All legal too.

      You have heard of software licensing programs right?

      Many schools extend them for all students and faculty and many corps see the small additioanl chargs and say "what the hey lets add that rider".

      Oh yes Apple doesn't have comparable ones becuase it is not big enough to care about big customers, their staff or children and parents. Thinking of playing the "well I do not belong to part of that privliged club" card? Don't because in a city of 12.3 million people more than 6.8 of them are elligible just by having kids in school. Add in corportate clauses and the number goes even higher.

      Sorry all you Apple supporters for the sarcasm above (Apple not supporting education should be an obvious sign of sarcasm and their educational licensing is actually pretty good) but when people start trying to justify Windows XP costing $200 (yes even MS themselves) a bit of bile rises up in me. List price is for suckers or early adopters.

    19. Re:Voice recognition by Nosferax · · Score: 0

      Er... no... Mac OS X includes a bunch of server services unlike XP Home wich is crippled. The correct comparaison is with XP Pro. You can't even use Remote Desktop on a XP Home pc.

      --
      Remember... A boomerang IS NOT the best way to deliver a bomb.
    20. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A very successful loan broker once said there are those who constantly hunt around for the cheapest rates and they play multiple agents to get the best rates. These types of people are not worth his time because they are catered to by brokers who do not offer any service except the best rates. His services include prompt replies to emails/voice mails and actually answers his phone and takes the time to visit his (potential) customers.

      You sound like one of those types of people. Apple doesn't want your money because your attitude costs them much more than your business is worth.

    21. Re:Voice recognition by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Speakable Items? It doesn't work as well as they say, and is really only a gimmick. But it is a cool gimmick.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    22. Re:Voice recognition by pohl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Simon Says for the NeXT, 1992.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    23. Re:Voice recognition by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Mini works like any other Mac. I think it's missing a microphone but I don't know about the others. I use a Mac Mini and it works great! I don't have a subset of features or anything. I can rip CD's, burn DVD's, it recognizes my USB drives, Firewire drives, my iPod, I can even rip video off my camcorder. All this with my existing monitor.

    24. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there is a pattern but you've missed it. The pattern is that while Apple continues to produce lower priced computers, there continue to be people that will not buy them until they are as cheap or cheaper than the cheapest x86 box they can find.

    25. Re:Voice recognition by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      If we're throwing dates around, the Mac OS had it in 1993

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    26. Re:Voice recognition by macthulhu · · Score: 1
      Right on Mikey-San.

      Look, I realize people want high end product at low end prices... But seriously. Apple does their own R&D and makes sure that their OS actually works with the hardware they're selling you. Those two factors alone should more than make up for the price difference. That argument is some tired shit. Seriously... get a job, or pick up a cheaper hobby.

      --

      Someday a real rain is gonna come...

    27. Re:Voice recognition by gklnx · · Score: 0

      [tinhat on] These are non-issues. Apple is DYING, man, DYING. It's going to die any day now. Who's gonna support your Mac when Apple dies? [tinhat off]

    28. Re:Voice recognition by rokzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the whole point of the Mac voice control is that it DOESN'T NEED ANY TRAINING.

      of course a "well trained" system will be better. jeez...

      the Mac voice control isn't about, say, replacing typing (that will never work properly anyway). it's about commands. that's why it works so well - there are a limited number of words and phrases, though still some flexibility with precise phrasing.

      the best use imo is the things like "home phone for Joe Bloggs" which will access the Address Book and display in huge font the home number. dismiss it with "ok" or "thank you" etc.

      another good one is to select a file and say "mail this to Joe Bloggs" which open mail, starts a message to Joe and attatches the file. it's good because it actually saves time as opposed to a lot of voice control stuff which ends up taking LONGER than to just do it manually.

    29. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you throw the same hardware on a PC, it would be more expensive too.

    30. Re:Voice recognition by coolfrood · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you are unaware of this. Apple doesn't seem to be immune to crappy hardware. That said, I'm waiting for the iMac update to buy a new iMac.

    31. Re:Voice recognition by kapowaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      The question is, just how accurate is the speech recognition? I work for a company that sells many different text-to-speech and speech recognition packages, of which Scansoft's Dragon NaturallySpeaking is the most popular. It's a ~£400 product though (for Windows) and with good reason; after training (and assuming you have a PC up to spec and a decent microphone/headset) it has a very high accuracy rate for recognition; essential if you're dictating a 500,000 word essay and don't want to correct 10,000 incorrectly interpreted words.

      The sort of speech recognition software bundled with operating systems in the past have traditionally been of a very substandard quality, and with limited scope for training to improve (the idea that you can use it immediately without *any* speech rec training worries me immensely, as people have sufficient variety in accents that regional differences could mean the product works or doesn't - maybe it works best if you're from South California?).

      Still, like I say, I'd be very interested to see how good Tiger's support is. Apple has been making leaps and bounds with its accessibility support (which SR is essentially a component of, even if they're not marketing it as such) so an SR component of the OS with OS-level integration and commercial quality accuracy would make Tiger *the* killer accessible OS. If it isn't already, that is.

    32. Re:Voice recognition by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This pattern is real, but it exists not because would-be Mac owners are stand-offish about parting with money, but because PC prices have dropped, and dropped faster than Mac prices.

      The problem, of course, is that people look at the cost of the hardware alone, and not the cost of the OS, upgrades, and applications and the value of the security and usability advantages provided by Apple. Windows piracy (and Windows applications piracy) probably hurts Apple more than it hurts Microsoft.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    33. Re:Voice recognition by deacon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You can only build a machine cheaper if your time is worthless.

      A common error in economics.

      Your time is only worth something if someone is PAYING you for it.

      Unless you have other paying work you could or want to be doing instead of building a computer, the time you spend on the computer is worth exactly zero in money terms.

      Oh, and if you use Fedora Core 3, and follow Stanton Finley's setup guide, you end up with a great OS, that was both free and Free, (you don't have to steal it.)

      Use the setup guide to install apt and Synaptic, and you will have a system which is insanely easy to update and install software on.

    34. Re:Voice recognition by fribhey · · Score: 0

      yeah but by the time you pay for windows XP, antivirus software, firewall, and anitspyware software your computer costs MORE then a mac mini.

      --
      / http://suffocate.us
      / http://johngrayson.com
    35. Re:Voice recognition by fribhey · · Score: 0

      also, there's no way you can build a PC at half the price of a mac mini with software comparable to imovie, idvd, and garageband

      --
      / http://suffocate.us
      / http://johngrayson.com
    36. Re:Voice recognition by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Not to me it doesn't."

      But that's the thing...when you start discussing alternatives to the Mac Mini, you are implying that the features of the Mini, including its size, are a consideration. You're paying a premium for the small size, as you would pay a premium for the small size of a laptop. The Mini (and other SFF PC's) are a distinct line of products than regular towers.

      It's the equivalent of comparing a compact car to a pickup truck, when your needs can only be met in the first place by a pickup truck. In which case, you should have been comparing various truck lines to one another in the first place.

    37. Re:Voice recognition by znu · · Score: 1

      Apple was doing this with System 7.1 on the Quadra AV models in 1993.

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    38. Re:Voice recognition by Seoulstriker · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      A common error in economics. Your time is only worth something if someone is PAYING you for it.

      Wrong, time is worth whatever value you give to it. If you would rather spend time fishing than building a computer, the time you spend building a computer is lost where you could have been spending it on a much more valuable activity, such as fishing. Just because money isn't involved doesn't mean that time is worthless.

      And this time is actually worth something in money terms! If you would rather spend time fishing instead of getting a hundred dollars (for whatever reason, luck), then the time you spent fishing is worth at least one hundred dollars.

      --
      I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
    39. Re:Voice recognition by Marlor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mac Mini: $750 for the 80G model. Superdrive: $130. Third Party 1G SODIMM: $260. That's about $1175 for a useable Mac. And that's five year old technology, running on a 4800RPM laptop drive, and with only Firewire 400 (not 800) for external drives.

      The Mac mini takes ordinary DDR RAM, not SODIMMs. I picked up a 1G stick for under AU$150 on the weekend. You can get a 5400 RPM laptop drive for pretty cheap as well, but I grabbed a 7200 RPM Hitachi Travelstar for AU$220, and put the existing drive in an external USB2 HDD enclosure (cost: AU$11). I have no need for a Superdrive, as I'll use my PC for burning DVDs.

      The Mac mini is a great bedroom PC. It's quiet, small, and unobtrusive. If I want to take it to work, I can just chuck it in my bag. Plus, it runs OS X, which I am still impressed by. For around AU$1200 I have a souped-up mini-computer, an 80GB external HDD, and a spare 256MB RAM stick, which has been put to good use in my parent's PC.

      Maybe it's still a little expensive for a second PC, but considering how happy I am with it, the Mac mini seems like a cheap gadget when compared to the my $AU600 PDA. Furthermore, most people would not need to soup up the Mac mini, and would only need the base model with a RAM upgrade to 512MB.

    40. Re:Voice recognition by thogard · · Score: 1

      But their sales figures for the mini mac prove that they didn't understand the market because they have to custom build nearly every mini mac that goes out the door.

      Apple could change that 40% to 400% if they would bring out a mini mac ][ that is bigger and uses a standard 3.5" disk and a reasonable DVD drive and two memory slots. That alone would allow them major inroads into a much larger market of people who are buying one mini mac now but are holding off till they get their act together.

      Of course I'm waiting for them to fix the mouse buttons on their lap tops before I buy anymore of them. They are a nice product but welcome to the 1990's guys.

    41. Re:Voice recognition by Frobozz0 · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling Apple did it right, but we'll find out soon enough. I suspect that, aside from Keith Richards impersonations, it should work as a navigation mechanism. For dictation-- well, I guess we'll see.

      --
      "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
    42. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The Mac mini is a great bedroom PC. It's quiet, small, and unobtrusive.

      With Tiger's new "private browsing" feature it's an even better bedroom PC (nudge-nudge, wink-wink, know-what-I-mean).

    43. Re:Voice recognition by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

      In which case, you should have been comparing various truck lines to one another in the first place.

      So, exactly what Apple should I compare to a 199 euro AMD Sempron 2300+, 256MB RAM, 40GB HD, DVD-ROM. Or to a 650 euro Athlon64 3200+, 512 MB, Geforce FX5700 128MB, 160GB 7200 rpm S-ATA HD, NEC Dual-layer DVD+/-RW. (all prices include 19% VAT).

      That's my point, there is no comparison, the choice is just too limited. you either buy an expensive low-end SFF mini, or an expensive high-end G5. There is no non-SFF version of the mini, there is no mid-range tower.

    44. Re:Voice recognition by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      And if you freelance for $80/hr or are self employed for $120/hr, that time you spend building a computer or buying one is worth how much?

      It's far easier to go to the store, buy a mac, open it, download updates, install productivity apps then your running in under 5 hours.

      Piecing out parts, assembling, installing the OS, configuring takes well over 5 hours and can take most of 2 days becuase if you build it, you're most likely to tinker with it to see what your computer does.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    45. Re:Voice recognition by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

      Yep. People want things cheap.

      I just got a PowerEdge 420SC from Dell for $238 bucks after rebate. It is fast, runs Linux great. She just said, not five minutes ago "I was really tired of that apple shit.".

      So if I add a cheap flat panel or LCD to the mix, we are talking $538 bucks. Apple's price doesn't jive unless you include the price of an expensive OS.

      So when can I buy my Macintosh without an OS? :-)

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    46. Re:Voice recognition by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1
      OS/2's integrated speech recognition was more than a handful of commands. It was full dictation/control for any app that didn't take over the input channels, whether that app was speech enabled or not.

      Not quite the same thing as the 1993 "Apple's speech recognition is voice-command oriented, i.e. not intended for dictation." which required customization of the OS to work.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    47. Re:Voice recognition by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I'd compare them to the eMac, not that it's going to give you the best bang for your euro compared to the systems you have listed.

    48. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to make speach recognition to work perfectly. And IMHO it's more than a gimmick when it comes to disabled people. That matters.

    49. Re:Voice recognition by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is why Microsoft didn't have proper piracy protection until XP. Up until XP came out, they felt the competition was still a threat. Linux wasn't quite on the horizon (for Microsoft as a desktop threat), and Motorola had nearly killed Apple.

      Of course, the competition is more of a threat now than any time since the early 90s, but that's a pretty new development.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    50. Re:Voice recognition by juiceCake · · Score: 1

      Put it together in the evening, during off hours. It's not like you're making $120/hour 24/7. What if you enjoy putting things together like that? It hardly takes 5 hours (though mileage varies so it's entirely subjective). It took me 15 mintues to price out the parts via the Internet. 1/2 hour to assemble. 1/2 hour for OS install. Various times for applications installation (Adobe/Macromedia/Mozilla). Futhermore, you know exactly what you have, furthermore, time is not wasted on repairs should something go wrong with the Apple for example. That said, I've never had anything go wrong with the PCs or Apples I've used. Others have. Mileage varies.

    51. Re:Voice recognition by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Do this for kicks.

      With voice recognition on, say

      Knock, knock.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    52. Re:Voice recognition by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      ...and up would pop IE. That is hardly innovation.

      That's because you didn't configure it to launch Firefox or something similar. ^_^;

    53. Re:Voice recognition by juiceCake · · Score: 1

      "Wrong, time is worth whatever value you give to it."

      And therefore it can't be wrong since, as you rightly state, it's subjective. If you'd rather spend time building a computer than fishing the time you'd spend fishing is lost when you could have been spending it on a much more valuable activity, like building a computer that helps you make money and saving a lot of money in building it as compared to buying a packaged system.

    54. Re:Voice recognition by daver969 · · Score: 1

      speech recognition is nowhere near done yet..

      ...in humans. If you had said "let's recognize speech" to me in casual conversation, i'd say about 50-50 chance i'd interpret it either way.

    55. Re:Voice recognition by wchanley · · Score: 1

      Sigh.

      Hasn't the BYOPC (non) critique been put to bed a few thousand times already?

      Want to build your own? The Mac isn't for you. It hasn't ever been for you, and it probably won't ever BE for you.

      Neither are hardware offerings from Dell, Gateway, HP or any of dozens of other computer manufacturers who make piles of money selling boxes to the non-geeky, non-BYOPC, non-Slashdot trolling crowd.

      The ability to build your own isn't a compelling advantage for ANY platform, regardless of hardware, or the OS or the apps you run on it. The availability of cheap components with which to build your own for "half the cost of a mini" isn't something the vast overwhelming majority of users care about (or will EVER care about). It's all sorts of lovely that it exists as an option for you, but you're a part of a teeny tiny minority of computer users out there and it doesn't make any sense for Apple to waste time and money trying to capture you as a customer. It probably never will.

      The Mac mini is for the casual internet user who spends most of her time on her computer using a web browser, email and instant messaging. Maybe she got an iPod as a gift last year and adores it. She's not a hardcore gamer, and doesn't care a whit about the hardware specs of her current Windows box. Ideally, she's already got a USB keyboard and mouse that will travel with her to the Mac. If not, these are cheap and plentiful and will work well with her new Mac. Presumably, she's already using a VGA display that will migrate to the Mac as well.

      If that doesn't remotely describe you or your needs, that's okay. But it's not a damming failure of the mini, no matter how often you'll troll the point around here.

    56. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Windows user who has a retail copy of a Windows OS, or anyone who uses Linux, can indeed get that $250 computer. But you can't buy a new Mac at a discount without the OS.

    57. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as someone who is doing video production work, Mac's just work better so the gains in productivity I get by buying a Mac far outweigh the savings of building a Windows or Linux machine myself (which I have done and have edited video on.)

      Plus I'd just rather be working, which is something I love, than dinking around with computers trying to make it all work--which is something I loved doing for years, but now it is just not important to me anymore.

      It is all totally subjective.

    58. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You either don't know what you're talking about or you're trying to troll. I can set up an x86 machine for $500 that would absolutely wipe the floor with any equivalently price Mac.

    59. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, I have to agree, what are these people thinking. If someone offered me a cheap ass hacked together piece of PC crap I would throw it out.

      I work and IT I have always paid $1500+ even when I was a very poor college student, now I keep new machines around $2500 without blinking an eye. Good hardware and software are king, if it makes me more productive the price is nothing and I can make that money in no time, and OS X allows you to be productive. For a time I was stuck using XP and I wasted so much time with workflow and waiting for the thing to do something, even if it is just a few seconds here in there it adds up fast.

      Anyone who has that much time to build a cheap PC, thier time must not be worth much to them.

    60. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've either never built your own machine, or you're not very good at it. Building a custom machine is invaluable both in terms of future customizability as well as creating a system that meets your exact needs.

      BTW, my going rate is $50 an hour for building a computer. If you want me to do yardwork for you, then I suggest you go stick it.

    61. Re:Voice recognition by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it's the computer that does the terrible knock-knock jokes. And they really are truly awful...

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    62. Re:Voice recognition by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I did that in System 7 back around '94(?) on the first generation power macs at school.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    63. Re:Voice recognition by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      So does this XP Home include file encryption support? No. Does it support participation in NT Domains? Nope. Active Directory Domains? No.

      Can you effectively use it has a webserver without additional software? No.

      So you're telling me that XP Home edition stacks up to OS X when OS X includes all of those features and more? Damn, you should tell the CIA and NSA right away to stop using OS X eh?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    64. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are building them because it is something you enjoy than that is great for you. But every machine factory built Mac I have purchased has met every current and future need right out of the box. That is just the way I like to do it, I buy it right up front loaded, and I do not have to mess with it for years.

      So, if your going rate is $50 an hour than surely the system price must add up pretty quick.

    65. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a lot of Mac users, I use multi-button mice on my desktop systems, but I will weep with agony the day that Apple makes the wrong-headed decision to ruin their laptops by splitting the single trackpad button into two.

      When working on my iBook, I click on things by whipping my index finger across the trackpad and blindly stabbing at the broad area beneath it with my right thumb. If I want to right-click, my left pinky just rests on the Ctrl button. Simple, elegant, and instinctive. Once you get used to it, it's actually better than plugging in a mouse.

      On my Dell laptop, I never even bother with the trackpad, because that fucking two-button arrangement makes it almost unusable. I tote a mouse around with me on the occasions when I need to use the PC at all (which has become less and less often over the years.)

    66. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The technology behind Speech Manager is pretty old. Speech recognition and text to speech have been around even in System 7 (that was in early 90's and 7 major upgrades ago). It was too bad that Apple was distracted by major issues (staying alive for one) that they never really get the technology fully developed and into critical mass. There are other old technologies like Inkwell that are just waiting to be fully exploited. Hopefully, now that Apple's market share goes up and Mac OS X is years ahead of the competition and mature, Apple would go back to their old portfolios and develop some of their great ideas some more.

    67. Re:Voice recognition by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Mac OS X includes speech commands, not speech-to-text. You can't dictate to your Mac using the built-in software. So don't compare it to anything you talked about here; it's a different kind of solution.

      That said, speech commands work amazingly well. You can click a file in the Finder and say "Mail this to (name from your address book)," and it opens up a Mail window with that address, the file attached, ready for you to type or just click "Send."

      That's cool. That's really cool. No question. But you know what really blows me away? About two weeks ago, without really thinking about it, I did it while brushing my teeth. Seriously. I was sitting at my computer at home early in the morning, still half asleep, with my toothbrush in my mouth. I mumbled "Send the latest blah-blah file to person-so-n-so," which I have set up to trigger a Spotlight search to find the most recent copy of a specific file and e-mail it to the named contact. (I have to do this often enough it was worth automating.) I said this with my toothbrush in my mouth, with a mouth full of Crest. And it understood me.

      Honestly, it kinda freaked me out a little. It was a very "Open the pod bay doors, Hal" moment.

      (Just for fun, I tried it again, and it didn't work. I guess I was able to mumble it just right the first time, totally by random chance. Got lucky. Still a pretty funny moment.)

    68. Re:Voice recognition by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm a college student, I don't have a lot of money, but I got plenty of time. Macs are expensive, and you can get a hell of a lot of PC for $500. Besides, if you are smart about picking out components and know what you are doing when it comes it Windows (and Linux), you're talking about a couple days worth of time to pick everything out, order it, assemble it, and install everything. Then you have a low maintance, working computer for atleast a couple of years. Though, I must admit I like to twink and upgrade, so I'm always messing with my computer.

    69. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      The problem is that a Mac Mini isn't just $500.

      (I'm in Canada, so prices are upsized here).


      Yes, it is $500 US Dollars for the low-end mini.

      I don't give a fuck if the high-end model costs 750 Loonies. The real price for it in real money is $599.

      I would never consider upgrading to the ($99) superdrive. If I really needed to burn DVD's (and I don't), I would go with an external firewire-based dual-layer burner which I could stow away in a drawer when it's not in use.

      It doesn't use SODIMM. It uses regular commodity DDR. $150 gets you a GB out on thah internets.

      So that's $649 for a fucking sweet system, which runs whisper quiet, looks good in the media room, and takes up less than a quarter of the space your shitty "Shuttle box" takes up.

      One of the hidden costs of a Mac is that all of your existing PC hardware may as well be thrown out, as it's useless now.

      Never heard of eBay, fucktard?

      I appreciate that the Macs are cheaper now, but the Mac Mini is not as much of a bargain as it appears to be. Certainly not for what you get. I *wanted* to be able to justify the purchase of one, but it's simply too much money right now to get a useful system compared to a PC upgrade.

      Well, a lot of Canadians are pretty poor, especially in Quebec. Maybe someday, with a little bit more US aid pouring into your country (there's already a shitload, by the way) you can afford a good computer. I'm sure you can find a way to be productive with the lump of turd you bought in the meanwhile.

      Cheers!

    70. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, I would much rather spend the $1400 on a dual-G5 tower than that cheap POS

      I wish I could buy a dual G5 tower for $1400 (which is about 3 euros) but somehow apple wants more money from EU customers than from US customers, probably because we have a working economy. I'd rather pay the US prices after exchange rates, especially since a US dollar isn't worth the paper it's printed on. In fact, lots of poor people over here buy US dollars instead of toilet paper, because it's cheaper.

    71. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when can I buy my Macintosh without an OS? :-)

      What kind of idiot are you?

      The OS is the best thing about the Macintosh.

      Without it, the mini is just another computer... granted, a beautiful, elegant, and quiet space-saving computer, but nothing to turn cartwheels about.

    72. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word to ya mutha.

      The only bitch I have with OSX is that it didn't come with a few network tools that do come with OSX server. But since it's BSD, I can add the ones on freshmeat or sourceforge if I need.

      The only other bitch is that XCode w/ the frameworks is nowhere as easy to code with as kdevelop/qt is.

      I spent the money and it was seriously worth it.

    73. Re:Voice recognition by zorander · · Score: 1

      All laptops released by them in nearly the last 2 years have w-enabled trackpads. Rest two fingers on the pad when you click and it's a "right click" (ctrl-click). Combine this with two-finger scrolling and I'd rather have my trackpad than a mouse. This is my first mac and it took me a while to appreciate the 1-button approach, but now that I've gotten used to it, it doesn't bother me at all.

      For some computers you need to install a hacked mouse driver to activate the features. It took all of 30 seconds and I haven't looked back.

    74. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem, of course, is that people look at the cost of the hardware alone, and not the cost of the OS, upgrades, and applications and the value of the security and usability advantages provided by Ap

      Not even. A lot of people boasted that they got a deal at Dell or Gateway for $399 and neglect to mention that they upgraded the hardware for more memory, graphic card, etc.. For a lot of people, the base price is the one that sticks in their mind, not the total price, because they are so proud of getting "the best deal".

      It is similar to buying a car. Most people won't add the cost of extra accessories to their car price. Dell is very successful because of this.

    75. Re:Voice recognition by zorander · · Score: 1

      When I said it "wasn't a real part of their product line" I was referring to the fact that buying a mini, monitor, keyboard, and mouse requires spending more than you would on an iMac. This basically means that they're encouraging you to use your own hardware (they are). It's unlike apple to allow users to compromise the "apple style" like this by plugging in an ordinary beige monitor. The mini is meant to be the next step in switching for an iPod user on Windows or a new gadget for the devoted fanboy. I don't see it targeted as a primary computer for any serious user.

    76. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hasn't the BYOPC (non) critique been put to bed a few thousand times already?

      We are going to shoot for tens of thousand times and we still have a long way to go. So, carry on!

    77. Re:Voice recognition by timeOday · · Score: 3, Funny
      I mumbled "Send the latest blah-blah file to person-so-n-so,"... And it understood me.

      Honestly, it kinda freaked me out a little. It was a very "Open the pod bay doors, Hal" moment.

      So you're saying OS-X recognizes the commands, but refuses to carry them out?
    78. Re:Voice recognition by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      20" iMac $1,899.00
      Samsung 213T-Black / 21-Inch / 1600 x 1200 UXGA / Black / DVI / LCD Monitor $589.99
      $1,899.00
      - $589.99
      ---------
      $1,309.01

      $1,309.01 seems a little over priced to me for the iMac (without the monitor cost) with only 256MB of memory and a weak 64MB video card. I could build a much better x86 system for that price. Heck I could build a better x86 system including a good 17" LCD for less than the iMac minus the iMac 20" LCD cost.

      I don't think most/all Mac buyers get a Mac because of cost. It seems silly every time I hear a Mac fan try to compare the cost of a Mac vs. the cost of a comparable x86. The x86 is a commodity while the Mac is not. They will never be equal in price unless Apple gets a much larger portion of the personal computer market.

      If you like a Mac just buy one and don't worry about justifying the price tag to anyone, it is your money after all.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    79. Re:Voice recognition by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      Point taken. I seem to recall a story, though, where Apple had initially thought that current MAC users would adopt them and were surprised that so many PC users did. Though, that would be kinda odd given that they can use standard PC kb's, mice, and monitors. You are right, it isn't typical.

    80. Re:Voice recognition by timeOday · · Score: 1
      A very successful loan broker once said there are those who constantly hunt around for the cheapest rates and they play multiple agents to get the best rates.
      I can't tell whether you are arguing for or against buying an Apple. My job as a consumer is not to make brokers and other commission-based salespeople "successful." It is to get the best deal for myself.
    81. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hmmm... guess you're American then.

      As a New Zealander, I've tried and tried to use Panther's voice command recognition (mainly for chess playing ;), and the damn thing just won't recognise my voice.

      Doesn't matter how clearly I speak, whether slow or fast, it won't recognise simple commands, or it gets them wrong.

      Stupid computer OS. If they are going to have it, maybe they should make it so it can recognise clear English from anywhere?

      (I'm a damn sight more understandable than a Texan accent, or some Brooklyn guy in real life :)

    82. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the biggest load of horse shit I've ever heard.

      Mac OS 9 or OS X 10.1 was a threat? Give me a fucking break! Macintoshes were for "artsy fartsy" people who didn't do "real work" back then. Now they're hip and cool and everybody is interested in them because, hunh, you CAN seem to do work on them and everyone who uses them says they don't suck.

      No, the real reason they put Activation in XP is because they could get away with it, not because they were scared of competition. More like, the competition was so dead, they could ram Activation down people's throats and nobody could do anything about it. Thus, increasing profits because Grandpa Pirate couldn't borrow his neighbor's CD anymore.

      I would also argue that Microsoft only got around to even being able to technologically support such a thing as Activation until Windows 2000. Once the foundation for writing apps that didn't randomly fuck up and require you to reinstall every month was laid, then they figured they could do this Activation thing and not get people too pissed at them, because they didn't have to reinstall Windows as often.

    83. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the last thing you Europeans invented? The World War?

    84. Re:Voice recognition by ColMustard · · Score: 1

      Only the zealots claim that a Mac is cheaper. Most of us realize that x86 hardware is a commodity, and that you will obviously be paying more for Apple hardware. The point I like to bring up, though, is that the price gap is usually a lot smaller nowadays than many people realize. Most people buy Macs for the software (whether they realize it or not), and I consider the difference well worth it. But that's just me.

      --
      Moof.
    85. Re:Voice recognition by ColMustard · · Score: 1
      A common error in economics. Your time is only worth something if someone is PAYING you for it.
      That's a load of crap. I don't get paid by spending time with my kids. I don't get paid by helping the wife with yard work. So that time is worth nothing? Perhaps my time is worth nothing to you, but it's worth an awful lot to me--far beyond any dollar amount you could put on it.

      So when am I supposed to build a computer? When I'm supposed to be at my desk job or when I want to spend time with my kids? Right. My time isn't worthless, thanks.
      --
      Moof.
    86. Re:Voice recognition by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Funny
      Here's a good one if you want to confuse a voice dictation system. In Burbank, CA, there is a street named Pass avenue, and it includes an overpass that passes over the freeway. If you were to travel that on a certain major Jewish holidy, you would "pass over Pass overpass over Passover".

      Good luck getting that recognized by today's speech recognition systems!

    87. Re:Voice recognition by jcr · · Score: 1

      The question is, just how accurate is the speech recognition?

      It's very good, provided that you have the right microphone. The built-in mic on the powerbooks and the iMac line all work pretty well.

      I have had varying degrees of success with different USB microphones. The gain curve seems to be the crucial factor.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    88. Re:Voice recognition by Skibbering · · Score: 5, Funny

      I turned off Speech Recognition on my Mac - it was freaking me out when it started responding to voices on the TV. No lie! A typical conversation:

      TV: "...we don't have the time..."
      Mac: "It's seven thirty two".

      Ok, it's not exactly riveting dialogue, but still.. You KNOW you're getting neurotic when your household appliances are having conversations and you start feeling left out.

    89. Re:Voice recognition by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      The correct term is beleaguered Apple .

      Learn it, love it, use it.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    90. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a ridiculous, uninformed comment. In a situation like this, the value of your time is totally quantifiable, and nowhere near "worthless".

      Eg. Apple's computer that I thought about buying: $1500

      Comparable PC that I have to put together: $1200

      Time to build computer: 2 hours.

      Resulting value of my time: $150/hr.

      Now, I know I don't make anywhere near $150/hr for my job, so it's well worth it for me to do this myself.

    91. Re:Voice recognition by AnonymousKev · · Score: 1
      >> Yes, size counts.

      >Not to me it doesn't.

      So your other computer is a UNIVAC? :)

      --
      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997
      (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
    92. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      As a New Zealander, I've tried and tried to use Panther's voice command recognition (mainly for chess playing ;), and the damn thing just won't recognise my voice.

      That seems perfectly reasonable to me. When I was there I couldn't understand anybody either.

    93. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Darn, no mod points right now. But crap, that was funny...

    94. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering there are fewer people in Australia and New Zealand combined than there are in greater Los Angeles, I'd say ... um ... no.

    95. Re:Voice recognition by cowscows · · Score: 1

      When I still lived with my parents, I'd write little scripts that just said things with the text to speech, so you could have very limited (if not predictable) conversations with the computer. I'd name them things that my family members would say a lot, and since the computer was sitting out in a common area, it responded to people who weren't expecting the computer to enter their conversations. I guess it was fun.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    96. Re:Voice recognition by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      What? You pc user just don't "get it". It's not about the hardware but the software that run on it and how it integrates so well and "just works".

      Why should I do sys admin crap at home? I work in IT so I'm not the least bit interested with futzing around with software/hardware to get to work.

      If you install linux on a mac, the "advantage" is gone.

      All of you "AMD" and "P4" fanboys can go to hell for all I care. I don't give a damn about hardware other than the fact that it runs the software I want. An X86 machine will "not" run the software I want to run nor with will come with the ports I want as standard. I don't give a fuck about printer ports, serial ports, floppy drives or any other "legacy" hardware. This is the 21st century people. Get with the times already.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    97. Re:Voice recognition by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Two words: Opportunity cost. I'm surprised you don't seem to be aware of this, since you seem to imply you know a lot about economics.

      In any case, there appears to be a claim here that Mac is more expensive "because it's possible to build your own computer cheaper", at least in principle. But this is ONLY true IF you are capable of building your own (and have some time to waste on it), these conditions don't apply to 90% of the population. Would you claim that my mom could save money by building her own computer? I hardly think so, she just doesn't know how. She could pay someone to do it, sure, but then she can only 'gain' if she can find someone willing to do computer technician work for free, i.e. a person who values their time as worthless. Maybe if she's lucky she'll find someone to do that, but can the entire population all find free technicians? Fat chance.

    98. Re:Voice recognition by Warhaven · · Score: 1

      You also have to ask yourself, "Can I get a QUALITY computer for sub $500, and not some computer that uses fans fashioned from blocks of wood by an 8-year-old in Thailand?"

      Yes, I'm sure you can build a PC for $250.00, but will it last for more than a year? Can it integrate nicely in a car? Will the $250.00 PC have the horsepower to run Microsoft's latest operating system (Longhorn), or even last-year's games (UT2004, et al)?

      The mini is nicely equipped for its price. It can run the latest rendition of OS X and applications with ease and with enough horsepower to spare for NwN and other semi-intensive games.

      It also looks nice. With a sub-$500 PC (or PCs in general), you hide it under your desk in your room or office. With a Mini (or Macs in general), you have it in your livingroom for people to see.

    99. Re:Voice recognition by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Then you have a low maintance, working computer for atleast a couple of years.

      If everything goes well, yes.

      And only a couple days worth of time?

      I could kill a day just trying to pick out optical drives (figure out what I want, find the cheapsest place I trust, try to decide it that's really what I want, place the order, check hourly to see if its shipped, then hit tracking site for shipping company every hour to see where my drives are, sepnd time looking out window for delivery truck...).

      And don't forget to include the cost of pizza, coffee and Mt. Dew consumed during the process. That could pay for a Mac Mini right there.

    100. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That's the biggest load of horse shit I've ever heard."

      Not surprising, since your interpretation of the post appears to be inverted in meaning.

    101. Re:Voice recognition by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Heck, I'm Canadian, and I can only get it to work when I put on my best American accent, and speak fairly slowly to it. Americans just don't speak quite right it seems, and everybody else has to adapt. I do like the integrated spell checker in every cocoa text field, though :)

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    102. Re:Voice recognition by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      I *do* mind all the crap that goes with cheap PC hardware, so I buy rather expensive, but still cheaper than mac, quality hardware.

      I did switch to a powerbook-g4, that widescreen, titanium thingie, a couple of years ago so that I could use OSX instead of windows.

      Best OS I've ever used.
      Hard to use for PIC-development and electronic-circuit simulations though.

      Eight months later, I sold it and bought a thinkpad for the money.
      I couldn't get used to the keyboard and trackpad/glidepad/whateveritscalled.
      I've owned five laptops over the years, three thinkpads, and I will never again buy one thats only equiped with such a device.
      When apple introduces a laptop with a trackpoint and a high quality keyboard, I will change back to mac.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    103. Re:Voice recognition by tricorn · · Score: 1

      The 20" iMac screen is widescreen at 100dpi, and it is absolutely gorgeous. At least do a comparison with a widescreen LCD monitor. That "weak 64MB video card" is perfectly adequate for most people - contrary to popular opinion on slashdot, most people use their computers for things other than high-powered gaming.

      I'd really like to see the system you can build for so cheap that takes up zero space beyond the display. That's one of the things people are paying for. They're also paying for the ability to run Mac OSX. Yes, 256MB of memory is a bit small (but my Mom hasn't really noticed it). It's also cheap and easy to fix (double it for $40, quadruple it for $140 - I'm going to use the original 256MB from my Dad's machine to double my Mom's).

    104. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're making a mistake in assuming that cheap hardware is problem-prone. That may have been a certainty years ago, but today it's not. Ohhh, scary hardware is out to get me, that's why I haven't ever had a hardware-related crash in the past four years. Sure.

    105. Re:Voice recognition by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      you're right,

      But I think it's a case of horses for courses.

      My father's just changed jobs and the office supplied IT systems have been moved out of his study, so he's starting from scratch with home IT.

      Mac Mini didn't rate consideration.

      a 17" iMac however is going to fit the bill very nicely indeed.

      If I wanted another desktop for myself I'd snaffle the mini up in a moment because I, like all other "Switchers" already have the extra gear needed.

      In my office we long ago stopped buying machines with keyboard, monitors and mice.

      This let us buy more powerfull machines on the same budget, it also let us have much better quality monitors and mice than the lowest cost garbage which comes with most "package deals".

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    106. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watch dragonball z on my terebi it's kawaii ^________________^

    107. Re:Voice recognition by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      The 20" iMac screen is widescreen at 100dpi, and it is absolutely gorgeous.
      OK, here is an Acer AL203WD / 20-Inch WIDE / 16ms / 1680 x 1050 / Silver and Black / DVI LCD Monitor w/ Speakers wide screen monitor for the same price I listed. LCD monitors are not that much money any more. This LCD has: Pixel Pitch:0.258 mm, Contrast Ratio:600:1, Response Time:16 ms, Maximum Resolution:1680 x 1050. What are the specs on the 20" iMac LCD? Even if you add $200 to the LCD price I quoted, that still puts the 20" iMac at $1,100+ for a very wimpy system.
      That "weak 64MB video card" is perfectly adequate for most people
      For $1,100+ for the base iMac without the monitor, Apple had better deliver a better video card than a 3 year old 64 MB POS. And they should certainly put at least 512MB of memory in the system. Mac OS X is pretty sluggish with only 256MB as all modern OS are IMO.
      I'd really like to see the system you can build for so cheap that takes up zero space beyond the display. That's one of the things people are paying for.
      Oh, because you have surveyed all these "people" and asked them? A typical mid-tower doesn't take up much space at all. An just about any cheap computer desk you can buy has a compartment to to put the mid-tower in so it is out of the way and not seen.
      They're also paying for the ability to run Mac OSX.
      Really? It seems only 2%-3% of consumers want to pay a premium to run Mac OS X.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    108. Re:Voice recognition by andrewski · · Score: 0

      Dude, give myself or any other competent geek the parts and 20 minutes tops. The OS installation takes 35 minutes, and pow - the machine is built and ready in one hour.

      How much do you make an hour? $300? $400?

    109. Re:Voice recognition by andrewski · · Score: 0

      I must say that it's not possible to make the equivalent of a Mac Mini or any other Mac with an Intel compatible processor.

    110. Re:Voice recognition by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      I work with kiwis all the time, the accent takes a bit of getting used to even for humans. For example you'd probably pronouce deck and dick the same way while in American English there'd be quite a difference.

    111. Re:Voice recognition by tricorn · · Score: 1

      That looks like an excellent monitor, with somewhat better specs than the Apple monitor (brightness and contrast) (the Apple 20" Cinema Display is basically the same monitor that is built in to the 20" iMac G5 - costs $799).

      Why would I need to survey "all of these people"? It is certainly "one of the things people are paying for", and it is certainly "one of the things Apple is charging extra for". That's like saying that I have to survey every person who buys a laptop to see if they are buying it because it is portable before I can list it being portable as one of the things that people pay extra for it being a laptop.

      Why had "Apple better deliver a better video card"? It isn't needed for most people! If you think you need more video capability, then you're right, you shouldn't buy an iMac.

      If you don't want Mac OSX, then again, you shouldn't buy an iMac. It isn't worth it to you. For people who do buy the iMac or other Apple computers, that is one of the things that make the price worth it. Obviously, or they wouldn't be buying it. Very few people would buy a Mac just to run Linux or BSD on it. Linus would, but he's not quite your typical computer user.

    112. Re:Voice recognition by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      How can you double it for 40$? I thought you had to use ECC memory on Macs?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    113. Re:Voice recognition by tricorn · · Score: 1

      RAMJET 256MB for iMac G5 for $39, 512 MB for $69, 1G for $139, 2x1G for $275.

    114. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the biggest passenger airplane in the world ?
      Or modern civilisation, too bad the US un-invented that.

    115. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you meant to say was, "Good luck getting that recognized by today's speech-recognition systems without sounding like a psychotic android."

    116. Re:Voice recognition by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, nowhere on that page does it say it's ECC. I've seen several ads for cheap RAM for the Mac that don't mention that important point.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    117. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although born and bred near The Black Country I was bought up by london raised parents and educated in a posh university. I'll admit to having an accent, but its more BBC than Slade.

      Apple's speech recognition technology blows.

      Most of the time its not even close. Without a training system, or at the very least a regional dialect selector you have to put your best Cupertino accent on... much to the amusement of my girlfriend when I try it out.

    118. Re:Voice recognition by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about Paul Donahue? I took his fundamentals of mortgage orgination class (which met NC's education requirement). It was awesome. I've since left the career, but I still remember his insight and inspiration.

    119. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paging Doctor 'Iggins. Doctor 'Enry 'Iggins.

    120. Re:Voice recognition by tricorn · · Score: 1

      From the Apple developer notes about RAM on the iMac G5:

      Important: DIMMs with any of the following features are not supported in the computer: registers or buffers, PLLs, ECC, parity, or EDO RAM.
    121. Re:Voice recognition by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Huh. I didn't know that. Thanks for the link!

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    122. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You're right -- it's possible to make a much better computer much cheaper.

  3. W00t, guess i'll go get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    unless there's a torrent..

    1. Re:W00t, guess i'll go get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      unless there's a torrent..

      Here you go: Mac OS X Tiger GM XiSO

  4. Java 5? by Undertaker43017 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is Java 5 in the final version of Tiger?

    If not when will Apple be releasing it?

    1. Re:Java 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not in there and "soon" is the answer.

    2. Re:Java 5? by qwertphobia · · Score: 5, Informative

      Java 5 is not included with the operating system, but 1.4.2 is included.

      Java 5 will be provided as a separate installer, so that folks can upgrade when they're ready.

      --
      Never ask for directions from a two-headed tourist! -Big Bird
    3. Re:Java 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Java 5? That's Java 1.5.0, yes? No, wait, I mean that's Java2 1.5.0?

      Does it run on SunOS 2.10? Sorry, I mean, Solaris 10?

    4. Re:Java 5? by zorander · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, no. They don't want to break existing java apps so AFAIK, they're holding off on the release, doing it separately so the developers have a little time with java and tiger to update their products, then releasing it via automatic update in a few months.

    5. Re:Java 5? by ABaumann · · Score: 5, Informative

      No news as to when Java 1.5 (I refuse to call it Java 5 - see more) will be out. However, Apple has said that Tiger will be required for Java 1.5 (ie they're not gonna make it compatible with Panther) Early reviews of 10.4 Beta have said that a beta version of Java 1.5 is there, but seeing as apple hasn't mentioned anything, I'd be surprised to see it on an actual 10.4 disk. Summary: Java Tiger on Mac Tiger? If not now then soon. More: As for the name Java 5... Java 1.0 was Java 1.0. When they came out with Java 1.2, they called it Java 2 Then they had Java 2 versions 1.3, 1.4, etc. Now they have Java 5. Come on people! I don't care what your versioning conventions are, I just care that you have some.

    6. Re:Java 5? by Undertaker43017 · · Score: 1

      Well I'm ready now, actually the project I work on moved to Java 5 a month ago, and has started using Java 5 features.

      I originally figured no big deal since Tiger is out in a month and Java 5 was in the later previews of Tiger, so surely it will be in the final, but no. Worse there doesn't seem to be a date for release, just soon...

    7. Re:Java 5? by Undertaker43017 · · Score: 1

      You haven't been around Sun's "name games" very long, have you? Try figuring out Solaris versions some time...

    8. Re:Java 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I always forget to change it to text mode...

      No news as to when Java 1.5 (I refuse to call it Java 5 - see more) will be out. However, Apple has said that Tiger will be required for Java 1.5 (ie they're not gonna make it compatible with Panther)

      Early reviews of 10.4 Beta have said that a beta version of Java 1.5 is there, but seeing as apple hasn't mentioned anything, I'd be surprised to see it on an actual 10.4 disk.

      Summary: Java Tiger on Mac Tiger? If not now then soon.

      More: As for the name Java 5...

      Java 1.0 was Java 1.0.
      When they came out with Java 1.2, they called it Java 2
      Then they had Java 2 versions 1.3, 1.4, etc.
      Now they have Java 5.

      Come on people! I don't care what your versioning conventions are, I just care that you have some.

    9. Re:Java 5? by SiO2 · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether it is true, but macslash is reporting that Java 5 is not included in Tiger and that it will be available for download at a later date.

      SiO2

    10. Re:Java 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is coming from Sun, it should be no surprised their version numbers are fucked up. Look at what they did with SunOS/Solaris versioning.

      "Sun: We put the "Wtf?" in versioning."

    11. Re:Java 5? by Speare · · Score: 1

      Funny to see someone balk at the "Java 1.5 == Java 5" moniker, while using an operating system that is just as schizophrenic about marketing and version numbers. They shoehorn major releases into point releases just so they don't fuck up their "OS X" goldmine. Tiger should be Mac OS XIV (or at least Mac OS XIII), but that's about as sexy as Pope Benedict in a tiger-print leotard.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    12. Re:Java 5? by pizpot · · Score: 1

      ie) I blindly upgraded my OS not thinking whether or not it was ready for my stuff. Boo hoo.

    13. Re:Java 5? by Undertaker43017 · · Score: 1

      I haven't upgraded yet, purchased yes, upgraded no. Now I won't be upgrading for a while, since I won't be able to do development on it, until Java 5 is available. So for now it's Terminal.app and X11 to a Linux server.

      I didn't make the choice to go Java 5, my management did. My choice is to develop on OS X, but on this project that has become impossible, for reasons outside of my control.

    14. Re:Java 5? by bushidocoder · · Score: 1

      Sun wants it called Java 5 instead of 1.5 to compete with .NET 2.0 - pure marketing-speak.

    15. Re:Java 5? by mcd7756 · · Score: 1
      Here's what Sun says:
      Both version numbers "1.5.0" and "5.0" are used to identify this release of the Java 2 Platform Standard Edition. Version "5.0" is the product version, while "1.5.0" is the developer version. The number "5.0" is used to better reflect the level of maturity, stability, scalability and security of the J2SE.
      The number "5.0" was arrived at by dropping the leading "1." from "1.5.0". Where you might have expected to see 1.5.0, it is now 5.0 (and where it was 1.5, it is now 5).

      For the rest of the discussion, see http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/relnotes/versi on-5.0.html

      Of course, last year at JavaOne, the Sun presenters tended to just roll their eyes when about the naming convention.

      --
      Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them? --Abraham Lincoln
    16. Re:Java 5? by CptNerd · · Score: 1
      The number "5.0" was arrived at by dropping the leading "1." from "1.5.0". Where you might have expected to see 1.5.0, it is now 5.0 (and where it was 1.5, it is now 5).

      Reminds me of the old Procter and Bergman (Firesign Theater members) album, "TV or Not TV", where they explain the currency devaluation:

      "What was five is two, what was two is one, what was one is nothing..."

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    17. Re:Java 5? by jargoone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes. Java 5 (Java 1.5.0 (Java2 1.5.0)) runs on Solaris 10 (SunOS 2.10), which also provides the Sun (C) Java (TM) Desktop System, which incidentally, has nothing to do with Java 5 (Java 1.5.0 (Java2 1.5.0)).

      Got all that?

    18. Re:Java 5? by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1

      Ouch... I wish I had not read that... NASTY man. Just nasty.

    19. Re:Java 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Java 5 is alive!

    20. Re:Java 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have been FIVE developer previews for Java 5 for Tiger, so, they're working on it pretty hard.

    21. Re:Java 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      no idea -- but xcode2 comes with gcc 4.0. :-D

    22. Re:Java 5? by macpeep · · Score: 1

      It's not Java 5. It's Java 2 Standard Edition 5.0.

      But I agree it's ridiculous. :)

    23. Re:Java 5? by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      Not impossible. Just expensive. Java 1.5 release candidates have been available to ADC Select members for several months. My company has a membership, and FC1, the version that's up there now, works great.

      $500/year.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    24. Re:Java 5? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Maybe everybody should just do the Microsoft and either use the year or no number at all.

      Next up, MS will drop the "beta" monicker from it first releases.

    25. Re:Java 5? by studentAtTheOnlyTech · · Score: 1

      Anyone noticed any connection between OS X Tiger and Java 1.5.0 Tiger? Why both tigers? Shouldnt all tigers come together and mate with each otehr to form MacOS X Tiger Java edition?

    26. Re:Java 5? by Undertaker43017 · · Score: 1

      Thanks

    27. Re:Java 5? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      Solaris 10 (SunOS 2.10)

      It's more confusing than that. Solaris 10 would've been Solaris 2.10 if they hadn't decided to give up the "2." prefix in Solaris 7...

      ...and, in either case, unless they've changed the versioning scheme, the OS component of Solaris 10 is SunOS 5.10 (the major version number of SunOS changed when they went to SVR4).

      Sun (C) Java (TM) Desktop System, which incidentally, has nothing to do with Java 5

      Just out of curiosity, what does the Java Desktop System have to do with Java, other than being offered by the same company that created Java?

  5. How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some people were waiting on Tiger's release to find out. Does AltiVec handle the CoreImage stuff alright?

    1. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure CoreImage requires a 64 MB video card.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by varmittang · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think all those Core stuff will got to what is capable on the Mac in question. If the video card can handle it, it will go to the video card, otherwise it will use the CPU to render. It is something along this line, that the system with choose which one to use when you install Tiger. I'm sure someone else can add or better explain it.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    3. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by Professor+S.+Brown · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anything with a G4 will support CoreImage. The CPU will do the grunt work if your GPU isn't capable. The CPU doing the work isn't as bad as it sounds though, a mini's G4 will actually outperform some of the lower-end CI capable chips.

      --
      Shitram Brown, PhD
      Professor of Mathematics
    4. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by lurch_mojoff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure I had enough of this CoreImage_on_a_Mac mini!

      I don't see anyone in their right mind using mini for hadcore image or video manipulation! No one!

      And as far as iLife'06 will utilise CoreImage the performance of the mini will be just fine - not too much of realtime effects but enough to make a christmass DVD to send to your grandma.

      It is the other innovations in Tiger (i.e. Spotlight, Automator, etc.) that are to make a difference, not the ripple in Dashboard!

    5. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by Squozen · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're wrong. CoreImage will use a capable GPU if you have one, otherwise it will run on the CPU. Same deal if you're running a firebreathing dual-G5 with an FX5200 graphics card - Core Image will take the fastest route to getting the job done.

    6. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by for_usenet · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think the limit is on the video memory - I think what Core Image needs to be hardware accelerated by the GPU is a card with programmable hardware shaders (which most likely coincides with the video RAM level you mentioned). I believe this is on par with "DirectX 9 compatible" cards on XP.

      The other thing to note is that even if hardware acceleration isn't possible, Apple has optimized their low-level system libraries to provide a suitable (though not as high-performance) substitute. I have the last non-white/non-silver powerbook, and upgraded it to a G4 550, from a G3 500. The speed increase in things that were purely floating point were about 10%, as you'd expect from the bump in CPU speed. But for things that used Altivec (ripping in iTunes and some image processing stuf), the speed increase was anywhere from 25-33%.

      I'm curious to see how Tiger will run on this machine. I suspect that it will probably be the last release that officially supports this machine, but heck, it's 5 years old already, and by the time the next release rolls out, I SHOULD get a new PB ;-)

    7. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by rogerbo · · Score: 4, Informative

      well you're wrong. A lot of Vj's (including me) are interested in
      using the mac mini for onstage use for realtime video software because it's so small.

      Stuff like Grid, Arkaos and Modul8 will run fine on a mini.

      And for a home user a mac mini should be fine for editing and rendering home videos with DV. New versions of those will have core image filters which we want to use.

    8. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Informative

      The mini handles it all absolutely fine. It can render every single effect, but some of them are a little slow - the ripple effect has been manually turned off by apple because it runs at about 10fps. Two effects are slower than that, others are much much faster, but the mini can render every one of them fine.

    9. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      the ripple effect has been manually turned off by apple

      Yeah. They came 'round to my house yesterday but I wasn't home so they left a note saying they'd be back again in the morning. "Yeah sure," I thought, but sure enough, there they were! And not only did they turn off the ripple effect, but there was a leaky faucet they tightened up for me on their way out.

    10. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by nerdsv650 · · Score: 1

      None of my code uses the AltiVec stuff so I can't say, but the Mini runs just fine with Tiger. I assume this comes as no surprise to anyone. I do like the new compiler .

      -michael

    11. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So some guy asks a question and that's modded 'interesting'?? No information was contributed here. Jeeze. Some of these mods seem to be randomly clicking on stuff.

    12. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by Dink+Paisy · · Score: 1
      "firebreathing dual-G5"?

      What's that, when you stand behind an Apple X-Serve?

      --

      Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
      whoever rebukes a wicked man incurs abuse.
      --Proverbs 9:7
    13. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why there are both "Interesting" and "Informative." I love how you complain that something modded "Interesting" contributed no information. "This was modded Insightful? Where's the joke?! I know I didn't laugh."

    14. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same deal if you're running a firebreathing dual-G5

      Oh no, not another Apple product that will catch on fire!

    15. Re:How are Mac Minis with Tiger? by Ravnsgaard · · Score: 1

      VJ? You should really check out Quartz Composer, which comes with Tigers dev tools. It's really a cool tool for building 3D visualitingalingy stuff and it's not that hard to work with. ..and oh, it's native core image, so you'll get great performance. It also hooks into videofeeds and audio, so there's no excusse. ..and it's free with Tiger!

  6. Rising incidence of what now? by wheany · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mossberg also covers the rising incidence of what exactly? Spam I understand, but there's some other word there that I do not recognize.

    1. Re:Rising incidence of what now? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Virii the Laten plural of virus used in scientific english(computer science, bioligy etc). Its actualy present in my dictionary and is acceptable in normal english(UK, i don't know about US english) .

      It is fine to use it in this context

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Rising incidence of what now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virii the Laten plural of virus used in scientific english(computer science, bioligy etc). Its actualy present in my dictionary and is acceptable in normal english(UK, i don't know about US english) .

      Naturally we trust the classical knowledge of someone who can't even spell "Latin".

      Have a clue, free of charge: there is no Latin plural of "virus". If there were, it would probably be either "viri" or "virus". "Virii" could only be the plural of "virius".

      If it's present in your dictionary, then it is either listed as "non-standard", or your dictionary is wrong. Presence in a dictionary means that people use it; it doesn't mean it's acceptable in technical contexts.

      BTW, no, it isn't acceptable in UK English either. But I wouldn't expect you to know that - you also can't spell "it's" or "actually", or use correct punctuation and capitalisation, and you also seem to have trouble remembering to put a verb in every sentence.

    3. Re:Rising incidence of what now? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      haahha you dont have a sense of humor do you..

      that was a joke btw , just to stop other people with temper problems who dont "get it" having near heart attacks .

      Calm down its only a typO and not hurting you .
      http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.ht ml btw there is the origion

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    4. Re:Rising incidence of what now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have modded you down but there is not yet a "-1, Flat Wrong" moderation.

      There is nothing remotely Latin about "virii". It is never used in "scientific" writing, and especially never in biology. It is not used in edited computer science writing either, and is basically only used informally on the Web.

    5. Re:Rising incidence of what now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its was a joke . Its in reference to the old "boxen" is the correct term joke , I got it.

    6. Re:Rising incidence of what now? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      um hate responding to myself , but i just noticed why im getting so many correction.
      I accidently deleted a line
      so carry on trolls about me being a slightly absent minded/bad speller blah blah yawn.
      it should read

      Virii the Laten plural of virus used in scientific english(computer science, bioligy etc). Its actualy present in my dictionary(Biggus-dicus University presses english-Latin Dictionary) and is acceptable in normal english(UK, i don't know about US english) .

      It is fine to use it in this context

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  7. Which Karma Whore are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Which fanboy are you?
    1. Windows

      You wear wraparound sunglasses, even indoors. You wish your mother would let you ride a motorbike. You tell your friends you're pulling in $50,000 a year and $2,000 a month "playing the stock market" but in reality you're only bringing in half that and your dividends from MSFT havn't been good in years. Your non computing friends all turn to you for help; you only charge $30 an hour. Your collegues talk about you behind your back. Your workplace nickname is likely to be "The Asshole". Unlike the Linux fanboys, you actually try to pick up dates in bars but women laugh at you.
    2. Apple

      You think you're so cool you hurt. You have mirrors on every wall in your "loft apartment", which is really a grimy little apartment next to a guy who plays Guns 'n Roses at 3am. All of your furniture is from Ikea. You sometimes think that changing your name to "Steve" would be "pretty cool". When you go to bars you only drink Miller Lite. No body ever asks you for help with their computers because they know you don't know anything but OS X, even if you do tell them you "run Unix" now. Your friends openly laugh at you.
    3. Linspire

      You regularly give $10 bills to homeless guys because you have too much money. Computers baffle you, but you enjoy looking at pictures of naked women. You don't know what Linux is, but you continually bugged the IT guy at work about your computer so he installed Linspire on your machine.
    4. Umbongo

      You shop at GAP. You probably used to use a Mac. When you saw the multiracial image used as a desktop picture and heard that this operating system came from the same country as Nelson Mandela, you knew it was for you. You meet with your friends in fair-trade coffee houses and talk about the eventual overthrow of evil corporations such as Microsoft and Starbucks. Like the Linspire user, you have very little real knowlege when it comes to computers but you would never use your computer to look at pictures of women degrading themselves.
    5. Gentoy

      You've been "into computers" for ohh, one or two years now and fancy yourself as "a bit of a hacker". Wouldn't know C from C++, or even Perl for that matter. Older Gentoy users may be building their homes from matchsticks. You've explained to all your friends that your matchstick house will have an "optimised floorplan". They've tried to tell you that your house violates every known building code and law in your area, but you've ignored them so far because you can't read those complicated regulatory documents.
    6. Linux From Scratch

      Much like the Gentoy user but you'd also be into sadomasochistic sex if you could get it. You're not just building a house from matchsticks, you're planing to grow the trees to make the matchsticks. You've cleared some land but don't know what to do next because you havn't read the books you've got, so you've posted to alt.arborists.newbie asking for help. It's been three days so far and no one has replied. You remain hopeful.
    1. Re:Which Karma Whore are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's another one:

      Fedora/RedCrap

      You own a Lada because you despise Ford. When you go to the shops, you buy vanilla flavour ice cream, cheese and tomato pizzas, and lemonade. You laugh at anyone who buys anything else.

    2. Re:Which Karma Whore are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Debian:

      Everything you own is at least 20 years old, and you stick with it because "it works". If you need something new, you buy it from an antique shop. Your computer is a 386 with 8MB of RAM. You laugh at anyone who has anything faster, calling them 'lame'. The council are about to demolish your house, but you refuse to move.

    3. Re:Which Karma Whore are you? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Funny

      8. Emacs
      Your devotion to the One True Editor is such that you (secretly) don't care what manner of kernel/windowing system you use to light off to run brilliant stuff like Gnus, ECB, or ERC.
      You like the substance of the GPL, even if you fall short of the full-on reactionary "ethical" style that some are capable of achieving.
      You wonder why the OS can't be as unobtrusive as the BIOS, and just serve Emacs quietly.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    4. Re:Which Karma Whore are you? by meringuoid · · Score: 1, Funny
      Hmm. I'm currently on Gentoo, but, based on that writeup... maybe I should try LFS. I'm not into the matchsticks stuff, but, er...

      ...

      ... ;-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:Which Karma Whore are you? by rob10405 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, I haven't laughed so hard at a post in a long time. Here's my spin on the Windows Fanboys I've met: Windows Fanboy- You used to work at Best Buy and you drive (**insert small foreign car model**) that you just installed your own oddly shape spoiler on. You refuse to spend any money on software, and everything installed on your machine is either cracked or pirated. Your currently working on your MCSE, but those damn TestKing cheat sheets are so expensive!!! You cruise high school parking lots searching for young girls that you can fool into thinking you have a future.

    6. Re:Which Karma Whore are you? by nazzdeq · · Score: 0

      Apple OS X X. You ARE cool, you drive a 530 BMW and live in a 4000 + sq. ft house with swimming pool, jacuzzi, outdoor barbecue and plasma displays everywhere. You've been a Unix user for 20 years and are sick of all the Linux distros with crappy interfaces and kids that think KDE is really kewl. The only Windows you have are floor to ceiling.

    7. Re:Which Karma Whore are you? by grunherz · · Score: 1

      All of your furniture is from Ikea.

      Hey! Only some of my furniture comes from Ikea.

      It's a long drive to New Jersey.

      --
      Four weeks, Twenty papers, that's two dollars ... plus tip.
    8. Re:Which Karma Whore are you? by duerra · · Score: 1
      Ammendment to the Apple description....

      Apple

      You think you're so cool you hurt. You have mirrors on every wall in your "loft apartment", which is really a grimy little apartment next to a guy who plays Guns 'n Roses at 3am. All of your furniture is from Ikea. You sometimes think that changing your name to "Steve" would be "pretty cool". When you go to bars you only drink Miller Lite. No body ever asks you for help with their computers because they know you don't know anything but OS X, even if you do tell them you "run Unix" now. Your friends openly laugh at you. There's a high probability that you're homosexual - or at the very least, metrosexual

    9. Re:Which Karma Whore are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't look now, but you can run Emacs standalone on a Linux kernel

      http://www.informatimago.com/linux/emacs-on-user-m ode-linux.html

    10. Re:Which Karma Whore are you? by sv0f · · Score: 3, Funny

      Leave the humor to the funny people.

  8. I for one... by earthbound+kid · · Score: 5, Funny

    welco... AHHH!! *mauled to death by a tiger for using a slashdot cliche*

    1. Re:I for one... by TrippTDF · · Score: 2, Funny

      Using cliches on Slashdot... it's a TRAP!

    2. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new kilrathi overlords. :-)

    3. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find the mental image of Admr. Ackbar unspeakably hilarious right now. Not sure why. Perhaps because he's on slashdot.

    4. Re:I for one... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Funny
      Everytime you use a cliche, God kills a kitten.

      Well the kittens got fed up.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  9. Pity by DenDave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pity, I haven't got my copy yet. Can't wait... Spotlight will definetly change everything.. I wish we had this functionality on our windows network. Usually colleagues have a habit of making emssy files and storing things all over the shop, if we could search on meta data that would really help. From what I can tell so far, spotlight means you no longer care where things are, they simply exist and the context becomes the "path"... Truly innovating and definetly worth my money.

    --
    -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    1. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truly innovating

      Um, no.

      Innovating means "making something new".

      Desktop search systems, even ones as powerful as Spotlight appears to be, are nothing new.

      Therefore, Apple are not innovating. They're writing cool software that does a lot of things better than anyone else. But they're not innovating.

    2. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot light will definately change everything. To all the Microsoft fans out there espousing Microsoft's plans to provide the same but better -- remember, when Longhorn comes out in 200x Apple will already had the experience and have one of their continual updates (which not only patch security but increases usability) to make spotlight better still. Apple won the race and will be ahead for a long time. FLAME ON!!!

    3. Re:Pity by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Spotlight is "locate" with something like fam automatically updating a database when a file's name or metadata is changed. The gnu findutils have been on *nix systems- including OS X for a long time, and have been available under Win32 for as long. Windows also has had what's called "indexing service" since Win2K, and "Microsoft Fast Find" as part of Ms Office for a while. All of those things are file indxing systems like spotlight. All Apple did to "innovate" was to make the interface a little prettier and tie it in to Finder/Explorer/the file system API a little more tightly. It certainly doesn't "change everything", since I still plan to use locate from the terminal on OS X, like I've been doing since 10.2.

      Anyway, to get that functionality on your windows network, turn indexing service on - it's off by default. Then define some usage guidelines and distribute them to your users. The reason they can't all work together in a coherent way is that they don't have a coherent plan. Solving the problem with an index is not solving the problem, it's working around the problem. :)

    4. Re:Pity by utexaspunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Usually colleagues have a habit of making emssy files and storing things all over the shop

      unfortunately, spotlight won't help you find your files if you name them dyslexically...

    5. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me a single Desktop operating system that has incremental, in-content & metadata search.

      The main innovation in Spotlight is searching as you type, not waiting until pressing enter. This allows the user to refine the search on-the-fly, which is a big usability improvement. OK, incremental search is not new. But system-wide incremental search? Now this is a new feature.

    6. Re:Pity by TuringTest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Spotlight is not "locate", is a combination of locate, grep and Firefox search-as-you-type.

      The main innovation in Spotlight is incremental searching, not waiting until pressing enter. This allows the user to refine the search on-the-fly, which is a big usability improvement. OK, incremental search is not new. But system-wide incremental search? Now this is a new feature.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    7. Re:Pity by dhart · · Score: 1

      Ever consider a Google Search Appliance (like the Google Mini) at your workplace?

    8. Re:Pity by cloudmaster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The main innovation in Spotlight is incremental searching, not waiting until pressing enter



      s/onSubmit/onKeyPress/

      Boy, what will those fellows at Cupertino think of next? I personally dislike things that search as I type - I know what I'm searchign for, and I can press "return" when I've typed it. Searching on the first few letters is just a waste of processing time, esp when I misspell something.

      And from what I've read, it doesn't involve grep. It doesn't search filecontents, just metadata (which most of the OS X users I know don't even use). Windows Indexing Service, however, *does* search file contents, and was introduced in Windows 2000. You know, 5 years ago? Using that little NTFS thing that allows file metadata?

      Apple may have put a fancy interface on it, but that's all of the innovating they did on this one. They have done some cool stuff, but Spotlight is not up there with the "most amazing".
    9. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spotlight is far superior to add-on desktop search programs available for Microsoft Windows from Google and others, because it doesn't have to constantly "index" the hard disk, looking for new files while the disk spins constantly.

      Since it is built deeply into the operating system, Spotlight learns about each new file as soon as it is created, saved or downloaded.

    10. Re:Pity by acidblue · · Score: 1

      Though the comment of "dyslexically" is probably a joke, Spotlight will still help you find your files no matter what you name them. Spotlight stores the metadata also, so files can be found by normal file attributes (type, date, size, name etc.) and by it's content. That is the sweet part!

    11. Re:Pity by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      Ha, but fancy interfaces is all what using computers is about! Not for system programmers, but system programmers are not "users". Many system-use enhancements come for very simple technical problems. The hard problem is getting the user mental model right.

      Searching on the first few letters is just a waste of processing time, esp when I misspell something.
      And how is it a waste of time with respect to misspelling the whole word and then having to type the whole thing again? That time is not wasted, it is providing feedback to the user so that she realizes her mistake as soon as possible!

      Learn it once for all: thanks to Moore's Law, user mind processing time is far more precious than computer processing time.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    12. Re:Pity by TuringTest · · Score: 3, Informative

      And for finding content, according to the article "Spotlight even finds words inside Adobe's PDF files" and inside e-mail.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    13. Re:Pity by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I haven't used it, so I don't know how fast it is. If the results are truly instant, that'd be dandy. If the results show up like the network browsing results - you know, a few, then a few more, and some more - it'll just be a pain in the butt.

      I'm saying I'd like it to be selectable. I often see all those extra results as a distracting waste of time in other apps that do the same thing, but do agree that some feedback is nice. Of course, the letters that appear in the textbox as the user types count as "feedback" too... :)

      I'm not knocking Apple for the pretty UI, though. It's a Good Thing. I'm knocking the press and users who claim that it's the most un-friggin-believable super cool new awesome enhacement ever, when it's just a simple UI tweak that's been used many times before.

      Thanks for the note about contents of some files being indexed, though I wonder if that's limited to recognized/specific file types, or all files in general...

    14. Re:Pity by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Spotlight will definetly change everything.

      The new Spotlight feature in Apple (and Spotlight-like feature in Longhorn) sound interesting, but I'm not sure they'll turn out to be as big as the NYTimes reviewer thinks.

      Okay, so they're basically really fast search engines that can search a variety of formats. But this talk of this search engine replacing the whole file structure itself reminds me of the annoyance of MS's "My Documents," "My Music," etc.

      I hate these kind of "features" because I do video editing and use several hard drives. So the physical location of a file is important to me. If I have 20GB left on one drive and 200GB on another, I need to be able to specify which drive I want to put my new files on. So the idea that I would just say "Oh, I'll just throw it into the OS without any regard for where it actually puts it because I can always just do a quick search for it" is ridiculous. The file structure isn't just there for FINDING documents.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    15. Re:Pity by KirkH · · Score: 1

      It is much more than a simple 'UI tweak'. You don't get it. Go read some more about it. It does include grep-like content searching -- and it truly is instant. Plus, can locate/find search inside individual emails? PDF files? Word files? instantly?

      You're not giving it enough credit. Try it, then trash it if you feel like it.

    16. Re:Pity by jbravo556 · · Score: 4, Informative
      And from what I've read, it doesn't involve grep. It doesn't search filecontents, just metadata (which most of the OS X users I know don't even use).
      Actually, it does search file contents. The API provided for developers encourage them to build their spotlight plugin to search everything in their proprietary files, meta data and contents.
    17. Re:Pity by the+web · · Score: 1

      I am sticking with QuickSilver. After a week of using it, SpotLight is ultra slow compared to QS. It doesn't develop intelligience like QuickSilver either. Where, I type C A L, and iCal comes up first, I scroll down and pick Calculator. The next time I type C A L, calculator comes up first... I haven't tried the main Spotlight window very much however, I just used it for the quick referencing. But your point rang true with me. As far as spotlight is concerned, your entire file system could be in a one tier directory. It does change the organization philosophy.

      --
      __
      Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
    18. Re:Pity by nerdsv650 · · Score: 1

      I've found spotlight to be of little use to me at home where I have all Macs as I tend to keep all my material pretty well organized. I am however thinking of writing an importer for my weather station app's data files and seeing if spotlight then starts to make sense.

      Unfortunately I don't work in a Mac workplace so here where it would do wonders on all the PDF docs that go around (even schematics) I'm stuck with nothing. Hmm, a FreeBSD version of spotlight anyone? I actually like spotlight so much that I've considered buying a Mini on my own buck to keep at the office. Sigh, it's just money.

      -michael

    19. Re:Pity by cirisme · · Score: 1
      I'm knocking the press and users who claim that it's the most un-friggin-believable super cool new awesome enhacement ever, when it's just a simple UI tweak that's been used many times before.

      We all know that spotlight isn't the best thing since sliced bread, it's (essentially) grep with a database and a few other niceties. That isn't the groundbreaking part. The groundbreaking part is they tied those pieces together in a nice UI so that everybody could use it.

      Even though Microsoft introduced indexed search to Windows a while back, it takes special parameters to get to it. Apple, on the other hand, made it easy to use and a huge part of the system. Nothing terribly interesting technically, but the users and the press love that.

      Personally, I think the best thing Microsoft could have done would have been to create a simple patch to go with SP2 that would make searching use the index. Sure, it would have lacked niceties like being integrated with other programs or with the OS. But tt wouldn't be too hard, and it would have been a competitive edge over Apple so when Tiger rolled out they could say, "We've already been doing this!" But, I guess that would have eaten into Longhorn. I would think, though, that it'd be better to eat into your own OS than let a competitor do it, but that's just my two cents.

    20. Re:Pity by badriram · · Score: 1

      System wide incremental search, you mean like MSN Desktop search. Which does do a terrrific job. However what spotlght does do different is MetaData that it can attach to files and it searches it. This is what most other search engines do not do

    21. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple won the race and will be ahead for a long time. FLAME ON!!!

      And that is why Apple's OS has 98% of the computer market!

      Oh, wait a minute...

      It is just a search function, get over yourselves.

    22. Re:Pity by Queer+Boy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have transposition syndrome, you nisensitive cldo!

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    23. Re:Pity by Vroem · · Score: 1
      The main innovation in Spotlight is incremental searching


      I think he was trying to say something about "smart folders".

      From the Spotlight page:
      Organically Organized Thanks to the speed and flexibility of Spotlight, you will discover countless new ways to organize your files. Take the results of a search and save it as a Smart Folder that automatically updates as you add or remove documents from your Mac. Smart Folders contain files grouped together based on search criteria instead of physical location, so the same file can appear in multiple Smart Folders without moving from its original saved location on your system. No need to duplicate, shift or update files: Spotlight Smart Folders keep everything organized for you.
    24. Re:Pity by zonx+lebaam · · Score: 1
      But system-wide incremental search? Now this is a new feature.

      It isn't for those for whom EMACS *is* their OS ...

    25. Re:Pity by conigs · · Score: 1

      Spotlight doesn't just search metadata. It will find words in the file contents. For example, I searched for 'Emily'using spotlight... It found a photoshop file that was 4 years old that had the word Emily in a text layer. I'd say it's pretty damn good.

      --
      Slashdot: where repeating an article in a post is "+5 Insightful"
    26. Re:Pity by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's more than that. I've kinda given up on explaining why, though. Let me explain with an example.

      A year ago, my friend George e-mailed me a funny picture of an elephant walking through snow. (It had snowed at a zoo. The picture was funny.) The other day, I wanted to see that picture, but I couldn't remember where I'd put it, or even if I'd put it anywhere at all.

      I tried Spotlighting "elephant" and "snow," but the photo was probably named DCS1003 or something, and I never got around to annotating it with a caption or anything. So that didn't help.

      Then I tried searching for George's e-mail address. That didn't help either, because George has sent me thousands of e-mails.

      So I typed the following query into Spotlight: "George kind:image".

      Poof. There was the picture. Spotlight knew to associate the picture with George because he's the one who e-mailed it to me. So it found it.

      (This whole example was totally made up. But I just tested it on my Mac, and it really does what I said it does. George is not his real name, but part about the elephant is true.)

    27. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Emacs is not a Desktop, is it? :-)

    28. Re:Pity by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy, but I wonder if your computing needs are different from mine. Or Aunt Tillie's.

      Just because this feature isn't useful to YOU doesn't mean it's not going to be useful to, um, not you.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    29. Re:Pity by ender- · · Score: 1

      Since it is built deeply into the operating system, Spotlight learns about each new file as soon as it is created, saved or downloaded.

      Copernic also has this feature as of version 1.5. It can index on-the-fly when using NT/2K/XP. If you are using Outlook, it will also index your emails on-the-fly. It supports Thunderbird, but sadly doesn't do the on-the-fly indexing.

      Not to knock Spotlight as I haven't tried it, but there are other systems that can do on-the-fly indexing.

      Ender-

    30. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm seriously beginning to think that you're Steve Jobs. That's exactly the kind of example he'd give at a keynote. Someone joked about it yesterday, but...

    31. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it does, i was looking for a message i got from my mom, so used spotlight. It found it immediately. But one of the other search results it found intrigued me: it was a PDF version of my dissertation. I double clicked it, and Preview opened up, right on the page with that particular word in it....highlighted and all.... I'm surprised on how it works, i mean it's a single word in a 200 page PDF file and i only finished installing Tiger 20 minutes ago!! Truly impressive!

    32. Re:Pity by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 3, Funny

      Steve would have used Bertrand instead of George, and he would have said "Boom" instead of "Poof."

      I'm clearly not Steve Jobs. ;-)

    33. Re:Pity by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      find can't do that? I use this to find content in email all the time:
      grep 'john doe' `find ~/Maildir -type f`

      The idea of keeping indexed content in a database is not a new idea. Locate did it with just filenames decades ago. I've personally done it using MySQL's full-text indexes to manage a large document repository. This document repository even has a nice web-based GUI that will do "grep-like searches" in the database for content and document names. It gets the text out of several well-known document types, including PDFs. It updates when files are added It allows searching meta data, file contents, and file names. It has a pretty GUI based on user feedback. Whooptie-shit, it took a few weeks to develop. I guess I deserve a /. story and a whole bunch of zealots loving me for my innovation.

      Spotlight is just a simple UI on a commonly used programming idiom. Generate a database with some keys that correspond to words in a document, use a hashing algorithm to get about O(1) search times, repeat search on every key press.

      Holy cow! That's amazing! A GUI for something that programmers have been doing for years! All bow to the almighty Apple.

      It's cool, and they're the first to do it "this way" on "that OS", and the first to make it easy for dummies, but revolutionary it's not. If you think it is, *you* don't get it.

    34. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it has been my experience that most mac users are like that. I have yet to see a mac user's "desktop" that was organized. Usually they are so crowded I have to move files off of files to find what I am looking for. No wonder mac users need such a search, they can't find anything any other way.

    35. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could be just trying to conseal your identity. You seem to know more about Apple then the your average Apple worker. Or it could be the two people I know at Apple are oblivious and don't read their memo's :p

    36. Re:Pity by abulafia · · Score: 4, Funny
      George is not his real name, but part about the elephant is true.)

      Damn, all my bar-room conversations end up that way.

      --
      I forget what 8 was for.
    37. Re:Pity by javaxman · · Score: 1
      I'm clearly not Steve Jobs. ;-)

      You'd better not be Steve. If you are Steve, dude, you need to spend less time posting on slashdot !

      Oh, and hey, I used to work at NeXT, know OS X, Objective-C and Java backwards and forwards, and I'm looking for a good gig, hook me up! ;-)

    38. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're actually phil shiller

    39. Re:Pity by telbij · · Score: 1
      Spotlight is just a simple UI on a commonly used programming idiom. Generate a database with some keys that correspond to words in a document, use a hashing algorithm to get about O(1) search times, repeat search on every key press.

      Please stop pretending like you know what you're talking about when you are just pulling things out of your ass. This sort of misguided (and hypocritical) backlash against such well-known phenomena as Apple's marketing and fanboy zealotry makes you look not only ignorant, but also a tad envious. Why? Because you're just blindly assuming that Spotlight is some vanilla database that any programmer could have whipped up. You also make clear your distaste for user interface design, which is really just an extension of your distaste for anyone who isn't a hacker.

      Instead of just spouting off the first generic abstraction that you think might approximate Spotlight, riddle me this: What operating system has an integrated, extensible index for every major type of file and database on the system? Sure, you threw something together that approximates the high-level idea in an extremely generic fashion with a no-doubt brilliantly intuitive web-based interface that rivals those produced by the slickest GUI dev kits, but there's a hell of a lot of room for innovation between an idea and the final implementation. If you're just trying to say that no single concept in Spotlight is innovative, then you are pointlessly correct. There are no original ideas in computer science any more, just combinations of old ideas with incremental improvements.

      Saying that Spotlight is just like find + grep is like saying a car is an explosion, some gears, and a wheel (the automobile wasn't revolutionary, it's just a rehash of old technology!). I use find and egrep with the best of 'em, but let me be the first to say that memorizing enough of find's syntax to use it efficiently for all scenarios is a major mindshare investment. If you actually go and read the tech specs for Spotlight and gave an honest attempt to conceptualize what's involved, there's no way you could consider it trivial.

      Remember, the goal of an operating system is not to be clever or earn hacker respect... the measure of innovation is its utility to its users. If Spotlight saves time in a way that other OSes don't, then its innovative. The fact that you can pick apart a high-level concept and tell a nice story about how a feature doesn't benefit CLI wizards has very little bearing on what makes a good OS feature. It says more about your opinion of Apple than it does about the technology.

      Oh, and BTW, I really don't care much about the search feature of Spotlight, I'm looking forward to the quick application launching...

    40. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George is not his real name, but part about the elephant is true.

      There's a joke somewhere in there...

    41. Re:Pity by Angostura · · Score: 1

      So locate understands application-specific metadata, does it?

    42. Re:Pity by synx · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with you! I'd also like to point out there IS a CLI to spotlight. If you read the 200 features page at apple.com you will see the name of the command on the lower right hand side.

      One thing I really hate about 'hacker' type is the denigration of all things GUI. The unspoken subtext is "GUIs are inefficient, only lusers use them, they aren't as powerful as CLIs, they are easy to write anyways". Of course good luck using a CLI that does CAD or provide the features of FCP (Final cut pro, video editing s/w).

      The final bit of arrogance is the indication that a good GUI is "no big deal". This is so incredibly insulting to those who spent a lifetime engineering superior user interfaces to make human computer interaction less buggy! I for one respect good UI designers, because there sure aren't many of them (goddamn does KDE and GNOME look like butt. While they may have good graphic artists, that is NOT the same as good user interface designers).

      The whole hacker superiority is so backwards and is definitely limiting the extent of the computer revolution. At this point in our usage of computers, they are viewed more of a hassle than a benefit, and I don't see many people trying to make that better!

      Ok, enough!

    43. Re:Pity by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      The real innovation is that the OS controls and doesn't require that a program be run continuously to do the indexing. Instead, as soon as you save the file, it's indexed.

      I don't know if I'd count that as revolutionary, but it's a very cool feature that will save thousands of Mac users a lot of time. I'd call that important, surely.

      Yes, you can do it with mySQL but only with data you control. You can't have all Word documents created in the computer indexed automatically without writing a user interface to do it. In this regard, the Apple approach is way superior to what you've done.

      I might also add that the GUI was a revolutionary development because it made it possible for dummies to use computers. Helping dummies is underrated as a technological and economic achievement.

      D

    44. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You seem to know more about Apple then the your average Apple worker.

      No, he doesn't. You are being trolled.

    45. Re:Pity by telbij · · Score: 1

      I for one respect good UI designers, because there sure aren't many of them (goddamn does KDE and GNOME look like butt. While they may have good graphic artists, that is NOT the same as good user interface designers).

      Haven't used 'em a lot, but you gotta admit they are a lot better than the used to be. The problem is that it's hard to get past a certain point without some kind of singular vision.

      I don't want to sound like Apple can do no wrong though. For years I kind of looked the other way about the OS X Finder because I liked some of the new features, but it finally hit me that the whole folder/window/browser metaphor has been mangled beyond recognition. Not only that, I don't really think OS X overall has an amazing UI, but what it lacks in greatness it makes up for in overall consistency plus some really nice details.

    46. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Phil can't use computers. He might hurt himself.

      Steve gives him soft blocks to play with whenever he's been good, though.

    47. Re:Pity by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Fast app launcing? Prelinking has been around for a long time, too. ;)

      Nice strawman regarding your *assumption* about my feelings about user interface design, but this has nothing to do with that. Apple subscribes to the "simplicity is better" school of design, which works fine in their target market. They do a damned good job of it. I don't particularly like it for my uses, but that's because it doesn't work well with my particular usage patterns. I support several users who are on OS X systems, and that's fine for them. I'm actually very interested in interface design, and I'm not talking about pretty icons. Interface design is a major part of each and every program I develop, both for my own personal use and for public consumption.

      For the record, I read the docs when I started in on this. Uninformed opinions suck. And, for the record, I could give half a shit about "hacker respect". I use vim and a command line because they're the most efficient tools for the tasks that *I* use them for. I've put the time in to learning them, and it pays off. I'd be a fool to expect all of my users to do the same, though. For lots of them, GUI tools really are better. And there are some situations where I prefer a GUI. I'm not a sadist. Heck, I run X most of the time (which might contradict the sadism part, in some circles). :)

      I think you read my posts and figured I was one of those 31337 kidz that pushed a CLI over a GUI at all costs, because only super geeks should use computers, and then only at a text console. That's straight up wrong. A good interface is mandatory for a good program, and often that means a good GUI. Apple does a good GUI for their target market, and spotlight is a really good GUI on top of the search features it provides. But the praise is all directed at the least impressive part - the technology behind spotlight. That's just a simple database tied in with the file system.

      My point? The technology just isn't amazing. The application of the technology and the UI they used to apply it deserves some credit, but the general concept is old news.

      BTW, I didn't say that Spotlight's just find and grep - I said that find and grep can search contents of files in response to someone who said it was impossible. I said that Spotlight's just an enhanced version of locate with strong integration with the OS. Call it an understatement if you like, but don't call it wrong. I fact, I don't believe that I was wrong about anything or "pulled anything out of my ass"

      To answer your riddle, BeOS. It's not real popular now, what with the whole "company sold all assets years ago" thing, but it had indexed metadata built right in to the filesystem - years ago. BFS is cool.

      Oh, and the automobile is just a carriage with an engine turning the wheels. The assembly line was the real revolution. ;) (yes, I'm kidding)

    48. Re:Pity by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I am more efficient with a CLI because the kind of work I do is not well assisted by a GUI. This does not make me superior to anyone. Different people learn differently and work differently, and should therefore use tools that they're most comfortable with. I wholeheartedly recommend Win32 for most of my users (and OS X for several others), because it's the best tool for them. That does not make them inferior (though, not learning to effectively use their environment of choice might bump them down a notch).

      Also, I did not denigrate the GUI or any UI devleopment (command line tools have to take user interface into account, too, possibly more so than GUI apps in some cases). In fact, I stated that the tech was not impressive, and granted that the GUI was the only innovative part.

    49. Re:Pity by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      BFS did automatic indexing of metadata at the filesystem level. :)

      The MySQL/web example was just to illustrate a prior implementation of a similar backend concept. It's relevent because the only access to the files is through the web interface, which auto-updates. If all of your files were stored in the repository, it'd index them all. Spotlight's repository is the hard drive (minus excluded ranges). The *concept* is similar, though Apple's implementation is obviously more polished and does more than is easily done with HTML. :) I'm not comparing my GUI skillz with those in Cupertino at all, just illustrating that the general idea isn't breathtaking.

      A Reiser4 plugin could do the same thing at the filesystem level on Linux (is anyone listening - write that plugin), indexing everything on the system in a database. Hooray for filesystems with plugin capability! Speaking of which, I haven't heard how Spotlight will behave with files modified in terminal sessions - that much I'm very interested in.

      And I like the GUI on spotlight. The highlighted files in the finder view are nifty, the "saved searches represented as folders" idea is cool, and the tight integration is great. That feature is not driving my purchase of the upgrade, though - the new driver support is. :)

    50. Re:Pity by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Just for fun, find all the messages he sent containing image attachments with grep:

      for F in `grep -lr george ~/Maildir`; do grep -i 'mime.*: image/' $F; done

      Basically. (files a maildir shouldn't have spaces or other weird chars, so the shell splitting will work fine). Spotlight's certainly much easier and quicker than that, though - and not all greps have the recursive option. :)

    51. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fine ... except George's e-mail address is loismustdie@yahoo.com. I was able to search for "George" because he's in my Address Book, and Spotlight knows that.

    52. Re:Pity by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      sure... you got it right, very smart. It's also why McDonald's has the best food in the world, and Wal-Mart is the favorite place for people to work...

      "people are sheep" != "shepherds are superior"

    53. Re:Pity by telbij · · Score: 1
      Nice strawman regarding your *assumption* about my feelings about user interface design, but this has nothing to do with that.

      Thanks, I thought so too.

      I said that Spotlight's just an enhanced version of locate with strong integration with the OS. Call it an understatement if you like, but don't call it wrong.

      I'll call it the understatement of the year then. I mean, it's totally legit to say "Spotlight doesn't interest me much", but you really make the backend sound like a hack which I admit is debatable, but far from a foregone conclusion. Consider:

      • Depth: If they are indexing from more sources than have ever been indexed before in an OS search (which seems like it might be true), doesn't that deserve some credit? It may be the extension of a old idea, but if it reaches farther then I still call it innovative.
      • Optimization: Again, I haven't used Tiger yet, but it seems like indexing from so many sources and instant search results would require quite a bit of optimization. I can't comment on how well Spotlight scales, but neither do you, but wouldn't you agree that if it scales well to a full 200GB HD it's pretty impressive?
      • Extensibility: An API for adding Spotlight support to your apps seems to go a little beyond the raw database idea. I know, I know, APIs are perhaps the most common thing in OSes, but I think it indicates a certain level of polish on the whole concept.
      • Interface: Okay, so you made brief mention that the interface is good. But look at how far reaching it is. I mean, it's in the menu bar, it highlights screen visually, it has CLI tools, it's in file dialogs, etc. That's not just a matter of building an application with a good interface, I suspect it takes serious engineering throughout the operating system.

      I don't have any guarantees on any of those qualities, but the information I've gotten so far seems to indicate that they are quite likely. And if that's the case, the engineering aspect of it all is impressive. Maybe there's nothing jaw-dropping by itself, but plugging that into the OS doesn't seem trivial to me.

      The technology just isn't amazing. The application of the technology and the UI they used to apply it deserves some credit

      Here you've lost me. You seem to be taking an extremely narrow view of technology as a high-level, but generic concept like 'database'. Come on... what isn't a database? I mean you can apply this tactic to any user-level tech you want to discredit. Eg: what's so great about the Web? It's just stateless anonymous FTP with a document viewer attached. Or: What's the big deal with protected memory? It's just memory bounds checking, who hasn't done that before?

      'Technology' doesn't begin an end with a convenient conceptual unit. To make a fair judgement you have to consider the whole implementation. Of course we need to be able to slice 'technology' at some abstraction level to avoid talking about everything down to the circuits, but Spotlight extends conceptually much higher and lower than 'database', so judging it that way seems extremely shortsighted.

      I think you read my posts and figured I was one of those 31337 kidz that pushed a CLI over a GUI at all costs

      Actually I thought you were a competent programmer with a bad case of Apple-hate. Now I realize you don't hate Apple; I'm guessing you're just sick of the fanboys.

    54. Re:Pity by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Alright - you took the time to use bold and bullet points. So, I'll concede that the impetus behind the main post was a bit of irritation over the Apple fanboys getting excited every time Apple does anything, whether it's truly innovative or not. I certainly don't hate Apple - I'm typing this with Firefox running under Jaguar on a Dual G4 machine. :)

      Spotlight's implementation is cool. The integration is really neat. Generating a hashing algorithm that will scale well to handle the indexing of the all those English-based file contents without lots of hash collisions (and the associated slowdown in search speed) is a notable feat - if they did that.

      The realtime updating isn't terribly amazing - they control the portal to file access, so updating the database with the contents of a file at creation/edit time is not a grand feat. I did that once on a smaller scale (the repository indexes about 75GB). BFS did that in the 90's (though I don't think it indexed file contents - just metadata). Windows did that in 2001. I guess I'm not impressed at the idea because, if I was working on a system-wide search system, I'd definitely investigate using hooks to the filesystem to keep an index up to date, and I expect people who get paid more than me to do this for a living to be more creative than me. I wouldn't have thought to call it spotlight and to shine a spotlight on the files found, but that doesn't count as innovation - that's fluff. :)

      I honestly think that the main reason this hasn't been done before is one of lack of cheap storage space or lack of spare processor power - and lack of a coherent UI spec on Win32. The idea is pretty obvious, and so it irritates me when people say it's some kind of amazing innovation. The implementation of the UI is very good. I'm also fairly impressed with the search syntax. So I guess they did implement it about as creatively as one can expect, but it's just not knocking my socks off.

      And yes, I'm defining the separation between the idea and the implementation as whatever best fits my argument. :)

    55. Re:Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, that's pretty cool then. And my grep thing was more of a joke - I don't expect anyone but a reasonably experienced *nix user to come up with that. Certainly I don't expect Grandma to know it - but I'd bet she could use spotlight...

    56. Re:Pity by DenDave · · Score: 1

      sure Desktop search systems.. but can you please direct me to one as fast, complete and efficient as Spotlight? One that is as transparent and easy to implement throughout the platform? Please don't forget to publish the API as well. Thanks

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
  10. How do the judge so fast?!? by scsirob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm always amazed how people seem to be able to judge the quality of an operating system within just a couple of hours. I can't imagine that you can really tell if productivity and/or stability have improved within a couple of hours.

    So how do they review the OS?

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by kevin_conaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Aesthetics and responsiveness of widgets? Application load times?

    2. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by Brento · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm always amazed how people seem to be able to judge the quality of an operating system within just a couple of hours.

      Journalists, especially high-profile ones like Mossberg, get preview versions of new gear long before the rest of us specifically so they can review it. They sign non-disclosure agreements to make sure the technology doesn't get into The Wrong Hands, and the vendors generally know the journalists will behave because the journalists have their entire career invested in it. If Mossberg tried to distribute pirated versions of Tiger ahead of the release date, Apple would stop giving him advance copies, and he'd lose prestige as a journalist.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    3. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err..,well TFA says they had review copies for the last 3 weeks. D'you think that could be it?

    4. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by ewieling · · Score: 1

      If it looks pretty and doesn't crash then it's "great".

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    5. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by teslatug · · Score: 1

      Well, if the previous OS's would crash in two hours, then one that doesn't is already more stable. Once OS's start taking longer to crash, more time will be needed to judge their stability.

    6. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by Peldor · · Score: 2, Funny
      Steve Jobs said it's better.

      Are you questioning our great benevolent provider Jobs, citizen?

    7. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by someonehasmyname · · Score: 3, Informative

      Somehow my preorder showed up yesterday, so I backed up all my stuff last night to an external firewire hd. Then I booted off my Tiger cd, formatted my hard drive, and did a fresh install of Tiger.

      Once Tiger was running I still had to install a few drivers, such as my Unitor 8, and Delta 410.

      After that, I reinstalled all my necessary apps like Logic Pro 7 and various soft-synths (Vanguard, Atmosphere, Stylus RMX, etc.) and started beating the hell out of this system.

      After a few hours without any problems I concluded that, for my purposes, Tiger kicks ass.

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    8. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That said, we often don't get time to properly review it.

      I remember reviewing for GameSpot (back in the dot-com days), receiving a game and having 1 week to write a review. You may be thinking "One week, so what?" but you've got to paint a picture of the game accurately enough that it answers a key question for the consumer: "Should I buy this thing or not?" I remember a few times I gave low review score to certain magazines on games that should've been higher (Twisted Metal 1, why did I rate you so poorly) and gave high scores to games that didn't deserve it (look up "Crazy Ivan").

      It's pretty much the same for OS software.

    9. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually that's all it takes.

      Back in the day when I used OS/2 as my primary, a co-worker was scorn because he was using Windows 95. BTW I worked at IBM at the time. When ask why, he simply said, "Windows 95 works. And I do work on my computer." Hold off on the Windows 95 bashing please. Basically when someone sits down in front of their computer and they want to do some work, they want to be able to do it that instance, not jerk around for 15 minutes trying to find or configure things to get to that point.

      So it's almost like anything else in the sales world. You have less than 5 seconds to grab the audience attention, after that the sale is gone forever.

      So your statement: " I'm always amazed how people seem to be able to judge the quality of an operating system within just a couple of hours" is actually pretty foolish.

    10. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Well, you can get infected with viruses and spyware in only a few minutes on a Windows OS and unlike Windows, if something works or doesn't work on a Mac, it will remain that way forever, it is not going to change, so 2 hours is a pretty long time.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    11. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      From TFA, talking about upgrading:

      "In my tests, on three different Macs during the past couple of weeks, Tiger performed generally well. Installation took about an hour and went smoothly in each case. None of the computers ever crashed, and every program I tested worked fine, despite the change in operating-system versions."

    12. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I just have too much faith...

      I just downloaded the the torrent, wiped my iPod, restored the tiger image, booted to the iPod, and installed.

      Backups are for girls.

      I trust Apple too much.

      It took Spotlight a few hours to index everything, a little bit for mail to import, but damn, Tiger kicks ass.

      Just to be clear, I didn't want to wait any longer for my Amazon preorder.

    13. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by elbobo · · Score: 1

      You know you didn't have to do that, right? OS X has a built in "Archive install" that does exactly that backup process for you. It pulls all your data, settings and programs aside, wipes off the old Panther install, installs Tiger, then places all your data, settings and programs back in place.

      It's absolutely painless and I've never seen it fail once. All that effort you went through, that's Windows-think. You don't need to go through that process in Mac land ;)

    14. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW thanks for the anecdote. Not because I'm doing anything similar, but just so I can consider it likely for Logic Pro 7 to work with Tiger - I have an order pending for both.

      The strange thing is, it seems that the estimated build time for Logic Pro 7 is the longest and is holding back my order until the middle of next month...

    15. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      Well, that really depends on how much s/he cared about their data/settings, and how sure s/he was that the Archive install wouldn't screw up half-way through.

      Having said that, I would probably use the Archive install - just after I've backed up my data myself :-).

      It's absolutely painless and I've never seen it fail once.

      Ah, Engineer's Induction :-)

      A friend and I once spent a day trying to install Jaguar onto a vanilla Mac. It's not always foolproof.

    16. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by JThundley · · Score: 1

      I'm always amazed how people seem to be able to judge the quality of an operating system within just a couple of hours.

      You can judge some operating systems after using them for two hours. Especially when they get infected in the first 20 minutes ;)

    17. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, Apple gives them a lot of money up front, a sheet which outlines what they want the reviewers to say/hype, and let them write the review up on their complementary Mac running the latest OS.

      Then afterwards Apple reviews the review, and in addition to the regular amount they shell out for a good review, they will give out bonuses for hawking their other services and iProducts.

      If it works them paying the tech editor of NBC to hawk the ipod, it also works for them to pay off and bribe the reviewers.

    18. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by douglasq · · Score: 1

      A friend and I once spent a day trying to install Jaguar onto a vanilla Mac. It's not always foolproof.

      I remember the fruit colored iMacs. Which one was vanilla?

      --
      "Form should follow function...unless it's just plain ugly."
    19. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

      I decided to go the painful route because I've been upgrading Logic installs on this Mac since Jaguar; from 'platinum 5.5' to 'platinum 6' to 'pro 6' to 'pro 7' and Logic is sort of weird now...

      It was still in /Applications with a 'Logic 6 Pro' folder and all it's settings in that folder, but Logic 7 was looking for all it's settings in their new location, /Library.

      Plus, this is my first Mac and I've installed a lot of random crap over the past two years and figured it wouldn't be a bad idea to clean up a lot of that shit...

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    20. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats simple. You use XP all day and macs by night. You receive Tiger in the post a play with if for a few hours. You get back to work and are constantly pressing Alt-Space (macs might not have a right-mouse button, but they do have a useful Cmd button, ps this is how you activate Spotlight without leave in the keyboard) and F12 (dashboard) as if their supposed to do something useful. Thats a quality UI. Its second nature before you're even sure if you like it.

    21. Re:How do the judge so fast?!? by elbobo · · Score: 1

      Makes sense. Sometimes it's nice to have that break away from the cluster of crap that builds up over time. Was just prodding you to see if you knew about "archive install" really ;) People seem to skip over it, due to expecting things to fuck up like in the Windows world.

  11. Gloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    My god is it a great time to be a Mac user.

    Apple Tech
    NeXT Tech
    Dual G5
    iPod/iTunes/iTMS
    OpenGL
    unix Layer
    and my copy of Tiger is riding around in a FedEx van at this very moment.

    Everything I've ever wanted in a computer system is a few hours away from becoming reality.

    1. Re:Gloat by kayak334 · · Score: 1

      How about, "It's a great time to be a computer user"? There are a million great applications out there right now that make everyone's live a lot easier. I find it sad how Apple users tie their well-being to their Operating System. It's like it's somehow incorporated into their soul. Perhaps that's why they respond so harshly to any sort of criticism towards their beloved OS.

      Personally, when a new version of my favorite Linux distro comes out, I don't automatically love it and have a great cheery day with my friends at the coffee shop.

    2. Re:Gloat by littlemichael · · Score: 1

      its just an OS, guys. i like linux, i like os x, and i like (as much as i hate to say it) win xp. they all have their own pros and cons. having said all that, my copy of tiger still hasn't shipped yet. dang it.

    3. Re:Gloat by JSRockit · · Score: 1

      I wished I felt the same way, but when you are in the market for a new Apple laptop and your choice is between the iBook (priced decent, but lacking specs) and the PowerBook (priced horribly and lacking specs)...it doesn't make me feel too good. The G4 is outdated, the FSB is pathetic, and the screen resolutions are last generation. It seems that Apple is having another processor disaster with IBM just like they did (still have) with Moto...a whole lot of over-promising and under-delivering.

      --
      I must be wakewalking through dreams.
    4. Re:Gloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, the poor little mac user who couldn't figure out how to use Linux has his little pink panties in a knot!

  12. Please, cut the hype... by slavemowgli · · Score: 0, Troll

    From the NYT guy:

    "[...] and, by many measures, the most secure, [...] operating system prowling the earth."

    Hum. I like OSX just as much as anybody here does, but please, let's stay with verifiable facts instead of hype, OK? Even if you're working for the NY Times.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hyperbole? in the media?
      because that would NEVER happen on slashdot...

    2. Re:Please, cut the hype... by millahtime · · Score: 1

      If you don't think tiger is the most secure out of the box them what out of the box is more secure?

      .. and openbsd doesn't count.

    3. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Loco3KGT · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, dude, you can't do that.

      you can't take a quote, edit it to death to remove the point of the sentence, and then call it hype. "consumer" was the key freakin point in that sentence and you just said "haha no. I shall rewrite this to mean something else and then call them liars!"

      Can you show me another consumer desktop OS that's as stable, secure, and satisfying? It ain't Linux, Linux isn't 'consumer' enough. No more than a Ford F-850 is a 'consumer' truck.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    4. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If you don't think tiger is the most secure out of the box them what out of the box is more secure?

      The original statement didn't contain any wording indicating "out of the box". That was something that you added. While true that Apple ships OS X secure out of the box that doesn't make it the most secure operating system. Which is what the OP you are responding to had a problem with.

      and openbsd doesn't count.

      Why not?

    5. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not?

      Because people use Mac OS X.

    6. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Aldric · · Score: 1

      Because Apple zealots have to stick their fingers in their ears and sing loudly whenever a valid argument against their beloved OS is made. It goes something like if (OS_X > WINDOWS) OS_X = BEST_OS. They find the existence of the Linux and BSD distros a threat to their smug sense of superiority.

    7. Re:Please, cut the hype... by node+3 · · Score: 1

      I like [...] the NY Times.

      Huh? Make up your mind. Do you like them, or are you critical them when you improperly quote them with mal-placed ellipses?

    8. Re:Please, cut the hype... by mattmentecky · · Score: 1

      Hmm, actually, I think the point the grandparent post was making was that (consumer or not doesnt matter) that Tiger is just being released today, and even if the reporter even did have a pre-release, what tests did he do? What evidence does he have that it is the most secure? In general, time (in addition to testing) is the best measure of what is secure/stable/best, and in this case Tiger just hasnt had that opportunity to live up to scrutiny, which I believe was the posters point.

    9. Re:Please, cut the hype... by zpok · · Score: 1

      CONSUMER OS, not BSD distro's...

      If you fail to see the difference between BSD and OS X from a consumer's standpoint, you're the real zealot.

      Nobody here is saying OS X is the bestest there is for every purpose imaginable, period, especially not when compared to what's practically a sister OS, but the consumer space is very different from your average distro space.

      You're just putting things out of context until they work for you. Which is btw the thing that's so tiring of zealots of any creed or color, whether technically inclined or not.

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    10. Re:Please, cut the hype... by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Um, put it back in context without deleting the other qualifications. That would be "most secure, stable and satisfying consumer operating system." Name another "consumer operating system" that is more "secure, stable, and satisfying."

      Of course "satisfying" leaves a lot open to personal interpretation, but I would be that most consumers would include things like ease of use, consistency of the interface, documentation, availablity of common third-party apps, and so on. While I own a couple macs, I still use Linux as my primary desktop (it's faster than my aging G4) and Windows for some work stuff.

      Let me put it this way: what computer / OS would you be most comfortable setting up for a non-technical parent / grandparent? While I personally like Linux, I certainly wouldn't set it up for my father-in-law... And his existing Windows box is a constant battle with viruses, spyware, etc. (he gets really frustrated with it.) I'm seriously considering setting him up with a Mac Mini.

    11. Re:Please, cut the hype... by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      you can't take a quote, edit it to death to remove the point of the sentence, and then call it hype. "consumer" was the key freakin point in that sentence and you just said "haha no. I shall rewrite this to mean something else and then call them liars!"

      Its called Journalism.

    12. Re:Please, cut the hype... by strider44 · · Score: 1

      Well I wouldn't say debian, slackware or gentoo (or even fedora) linux is consumer enough, but I would say that Mandrake, Xandros, Linspire and Ubuntu are (though admittedly I haven't used Xandros or Linspire, they are just from reports I have heard).

      *shrug* They're easier to use than Windows XP at least. But if it passes that test then you could easily say that linux is as stable and secure and probably as satisfying. Don't bother though, those words are as relative as speed. I like both macs and linux.

      (wow that post was pretty much an uncertain waste of typing power)

    13. Re:Please, cut the hype... by PriceIke · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know, I think my Commodore 128 is pretty secure and satisfying, nobody's tried to hack me yet. I guess it crashes now and then ..

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    14. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's "poor journalism".

      But unfortunately, few cares nowadays if what they're reading is good or bad journalism. :-(

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    15. Re:Please, cut the hype... by CatOne · · Score: 1

      Take an external firewire hard drive that's not formatted as FAT32, plug it into a Linux box, and what happens?

      In my experience, in every case, NOTHING.

      I have to go dig into /dev/ and see volumes and manually run mkfs. As compared to Windows or OS X where you get a dialog.

    16. Re:Please, cut the hype... by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Quoting from your post history...

      I [...] often [...] get [...] turned on [...] by [...] goatse.

      Now, I'm checking if that's entirely within context, but initial reactions from some random people around me suggest that it's a striking comment from you.

      (actually, I imagine a calendar and clock on the wall behind you randomly changing with each cut)

    17. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Palshife · · Score: 1

      You totally missed the point.

      "[...] I like [...] verifiable facts [...] [and horsecocks] for the NY Times."

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    18. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take an external firewire hard drive that's not formatted as FAT32, plug it into a Linux box, and what happens?

      In my experience, in every case, NOTHING.

      I have to go dig into /dev/ and see volumes and manually run mkfs. As compared to Windows or OS X where you get a dialog.


      Oh, SHIT! You're right! No dialog box for a critical system function like mounting non-FAT external firewire hard drives! Linux isn't usable by consumers! But as soon as that gets fixed, look out Apple!

      And all the difficulty I had getting my PowerBook to print to a printer on another subnet was my fault, I'm sure. Never mind the fact that the lovely dialog box only pretended to have correctly installed my printers; the fact that there WAS a dialog means that OSX is consumer-ready.

      Somebody remind me; what's the pseudo-html code for "sarcasm mode OFF"?

    19. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about? I'm a consumer. I like Linux. A lot of people on Slashdot are consumers and like Linux. So, if by "consumer" you really mean "someone so inept with computers that they can't deal with anything other than a one-click interface," then say so.

    20. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's </SARCASM>. HTH. HAND.

    21. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Eric604 · · Score: 1

      You are only a subset, he meant ALL consumers of an OS.

    22. Re:Please, cut the hype... by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      The linux box, assuming the kernel was compiled correctly, which it is on most distros, will support hot usb plugging AND fat32 out of the (box).
      Mount it, and write to it.
      What do you mean mkfs? I thought you just said it was FAT32? Do you want to mount or format the disk?

      Hell I can plug a microsoft mouse into linux and it picks it up instantly.
      Windows wants to install a HID driver for it...

    23. Re:Please, cut the hype... by strider44 · · Score: 1

      we are talking consumer here, with the inference of it being "mum and dad". In my personal case, my mum doesn't actually have an external firewire hard drive.

      Unfortunately for your argument in my personal case I do have a firewire hard drive. Plug it into my linux box and an icon comes up for the hard drive. Whether you've just stuffed up your linux installation or you're using an enterprise distro such as Debian, that's your fault. Looking at your argument you might just not know what you're talking about ("manually run mkfs" - do you want to format it as FAT32? You don't need to), so you should most definitely be using something like Mandrake, Xandros, Linspire or Ubuntu (the last one being the distro I use on my desktop computer at the moment).

      What's with the thing saying "not formatted as FAT32" anyway? Linux can support all hard drive formats I know of except write support for NTFS. That is politics on Microsoft's part, not fault on Linux's. Windows XP however can only support a total of one hard drive format that is not FAT32.

    24. Re:Please, cut the hype... by CatOne · · Score: 1

      Not FAT32. No OS installed. In my case, I've plugged in fibre attached RAID devices, and had to spend an hour trying to figure out how to format the thing. A Firewire drive, sans OS, would be the same way.

    25. Re:Please, cut the hype... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you show me another consumer desktop OS that's as stable, secure, and satisfying?

      Windows XP Professional

  13. Mine has shipped by rokzy · · Score: 1

    should be here soon. (as a student it cost me less than 60 quid.)

    has anyone heard of any issues with doing a simple upgrade instead of clean install or archive and install?

    1. Re:Mine has shipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me to ask such a stupid question but how do you have this price? I'm in France and see nothing on their web site for the students...

    2. Re:Mine has shipped by nkh · · Score: 1

      That's OK I found it. The price is 88.50 for the students like me, I can buy it now :)

    3. Re:Mine has shipped by dafz1 · · Score: 1

      The inside Apple Tech rep I talk to says, "Always do a clean install of a . release."

      I tried an upgrade with Jaguar, and that was a huge mistake. I gave up after a day of trying to get things working again and did a clean install. Even though I support 50+ Macs, each one gets a clean install(time to do Netboot?) with a . release. I don't like "archive and install" either, especially on machines with small hard drives.

    4. Re:Mine has shipped by torpor · · Score: 1


      i upgraded from panther to tiger 2 weeks ago, and it looks like it went completely fine .. the only issue i had was that my cinergy T2 (DVB-T receiver) drivers stopped working, but a quick hack of the code and a custom personal build of the driver source later, and wham .. no problems, watchin' telly just fine again.

      i wish Apple would update the Dashboard page already, c'mon! i wanna bloat my box with widgets, yo!! :)

      one thing is for sure, tiger is faster on my box (17" powerbook) than panther was, and it sure 'feels' smoother, courtesy of CoreImage and all that .. can't wait to get a bit more intimate with Quartz Composer and see what can be done in that department.. or maybe just wait a week or two and see what other hackers come up with.

      so i'd say, no sweat with the upgrade path. just do it.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    5. Re:Mine has shipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an 1ghz iBook G4 that I had done a clean install of Panther a month ago and installed Tiger directly over the top when I received it yesterday. It works [i]beautifully[/i]. My roomate has a 1.2ghz Powerbook that's Panther installation dates back to the reciept of the machine over a year and half ago, and Tiger runs like shit on it. It broke everything. Connecting Firewire devices gives him Apple's Screen of Death (I didn't know it even existed . . . the screen goes black and white and says shit in a whole bunch of languages), Expose is broke, his widgets don't work, Spotlight is slow as hell, networking busted . . . wiping his drive and reinstalling clean fixed all of this. Just something to keep in mind.

  14. You forgot one -- VM/370 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    7. VM/370; you're a genius with many years of experience. You've seen crummy junk like Windows, Unix and Mac and stick to the one proven to work system with a 38 year history of excellence.

  15. Expose - Slowness by DJPenguin · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've had Tiger on my 17" powerbook for a few days now - it's actually installed on my iPod so I can dual boot.

    One thing I have noticed so far is that Expose seems a lot less fluid than in Panther. Has anyone else noticed this, or am I going mad? The difference is noticable even with only a couple of windows on the desktop.

    Other than that it seems nice. My Vodafone 3G card works, and most apps that I have tried. The only thing I can't get working yet is OpenVPN - as the TUN/TAP driver isn't ported yet.

    1. Re:Expose - Slowness by HeelToe · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use gvpe with this tun/tap driver and it works quite well:

      http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~nissler/tuntap/

      Could you just grab the source and build it under Tiger?

    2. Re:Expose - Slowness by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

      That's the driver I'm using. I emailed the authour and he says that he'll be able to release a Tiger version next week when he gets the DVD.

      I did try compiling it myself just now, but it failed horribly. I have a feeling it's because the xnu module I used from opendarwin.org is from the wrong branch or something.

    3. Re:Expose - Slowness by mmkkbb · · Score: 5, Funny

      One thing I have noticed so far is that Expose seems a lot less fluid than in Panther.

      Well, iPods don't have the best graphics accelerator, so that's probably your difference.

      *gets coat*

      --
      -mkb
    4. Re:Expose - Slowness by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

      Walked straight into that one, didn't I!

      I actually did wonder if it was something to do with having it running off the iPod - as the machine does feel somewhat slower loading apps. But of course Expose won't be hitting disk (I would hope)

    5. Re:Expose - Slowness by Exitar · · Score: 1

      Its an official version (shipped early) or it's a beta?

    6. Re:Expose - Slowness by Jackdaw+Rookery · · Score: 1

      Anicdotal and pointless, but Expose works perfect on my 1GHZ 15 PB with Tiger installed. Perhaps it is due to you running Tiger off your iPod...

    7. Re:Expose - Slowness by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      I'll take a look at it once I get Tiger installed - mine's an up-to-date order, so it may not be here immediately - I may also have to wait a bit if I can't immediately find out how to do a fresh install from that disc rather than upgrade.

      I've been participating in testing a newer version of the driver after submitting some patches that help with bringing the tap interface down once it's closed. gvpe handles data link level traffic (ethernet) rather than network level traffic (ip), so it uses the tap driver instead of the tun driver.

    8. Re:Expose - Slowness by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      It could be swapping.

      --
      -mkb
    9. Re:Expose - Slowness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you tell me what build number you are using? (About this Mac --> More Info --> Software:

      Should look like Mac OS X 10.4 (8AXXX)

      Thanx!

    10. Re:Expose - Slowness by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

      I will have to take a look at gvpe, as I've not seen it before. OpenVPN works and works well for my particular needs though.

      I did spend the last couple of days trying to get Openswan / IPsec working with Tiger's built in VPN support. Got it half working, in that it works OK until my Powerbook is behind a firewall doing NAT.

      Apparently I need all sorts of weird and wonderful patches and options to support NAT traversal, whereas OpenVPN "Just Works"(tm)

    11. Re:Expose - Slowness by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      Without advertising it too heavily, gvpe supports many different mechanisms for tunneling, including dns tunneling.

    12. Re:Expose - Slowness by zorander · · Score: 1

      Perhaps expose is less smooth because you're running off of an iPod and expose needs to grab something off of the hard disk? I'd imagine the powersave/spindown on an iPod is a bit more ambitious than your pb.

    13. Re:Expose - Slowness by lokedhs · · Score: 1

      This is something I noticed in some of the It sounds just like you're not getting the OpenGL acceleration. What kind of hardware do you have?

    14. Re:Expose - Slowness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what a pointless post. It's like saying "this new OS is spiffy, I installed it on my tape backup, but it's kind of slow..." Of course it's frigging slow! The iPod's data capabilities are really limited to storage and access of things like email, documents and whatnot. No one has ever recommended running full screen movies or whole programs off the iPod, let alone an entire OS. Damn. As I recall, the iPod has a 4200 rpm hard drive, anyone know what the seek time is on it?

    15. Re:Expose - Slowness by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      I've always suspected the tool that flips screen spanning on in my iBook might have something to do with it.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    16. Re:Expose - Slowness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its an official version (shipped early) or it's a beta?

      Yes

    17. Re:Expose - Slowness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I have noticed so far is that Expose seems a lot less fluid than in Panther.

      Nope, that is one of the typical symptoms of an Apple update.

    18. Re:Expose - Slowness by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

      I've seen recommendations NOT to install an OS on an iPod and boot off it regularly because it's not designed for the heavy disk activity long-term (heat dissipation, wear&tear, etc.)

      Although it's definitely nice to be able to do so (boot off another device easily) on a Mac.

    19. Re:Expose - Slowness by avocade · · Score: 1

      It seems they have turned off Quartz 2D Extreme by default (check for yourself with Quartz Debug in Developer Tools), probably because of graphical glitches and some rumored kernel panics. It should be turned on in a future update.

      --
      avocade.com
      In a free and open internet, who needs Windows
    20. Re:Expose - Slowness by pavon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have to concur with the swapping comment. I have found very little in OS X that is CPU bound. However, even running a G5 (with panther) Expose becomes quite choppy if I have too many things loaded into memory (even if there are not alot of windows open). It could be that Tiger uses more memory, and thus you have having to swap out memory when you zoom expose, where you didn't in Panther. Also, swapping might take longer with an external harddrive, although you are already using a 2.5" drives in your laptop which are fairly slow compared to 3.5".

    21. Re:Expose - Slowness by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      I'm just guessing here but it's probably related to Quartz 2D and lack of VRAM. Your system might be shuttling several copies of the windows onto the videocard while doing the Expose effect instead of leaving them all in RAM while doing some of the effects on the CPU as it did in Panther.

      Check out these pics.
      http://ars.ord.cachenetworks.com/images/tiger/quar tz-10.0-4.png

      Notice in the Panther shot there's a bit of Quartz 2D done in RAM before the result is shuttled off to the video card. I can't explain this near as well as the MAN.

      Check "The devils in the details" here http://arstechnica.com/reviews/os/macosx-10.4.ars/ 14

      -Don.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  16. Fantastic by Digital+Warfare · · Score: 0

    I honestly can't wait to grab my copy. I genuinly excited !
    Never before I have used such an Elegant but powerful OS that just works without much effort
    Lets just hope it doesn't get too popular, then we might start seeing Spyware, Viruses etc targeted against Mac, Although, everyone hates Gates so why bother switching platform ?

    --
    "Sweet llamas of the Bahamas !"
    1. Re:Fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Lets just hope it doesn't get too popular, then we might start seeing Spyware, Viruses etc targeted against Mac"

      If at this late date you still think that is true, you are simply fucking dense. See also Apache v IIS.

  17. You forgot something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reality Distortion Field.

    1. Re:You forgot something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What in that list of items is 'not real?'

    2. Re:You forgot something by databyss · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you meant to say iReality...

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    3. Re:You forgot something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dual G5s, for starters (yes, prototypes exist, but you can't buy one). Other than that, half of the rest are already available on PC, and have been for years.

    4. Re:You forgot something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Dual G5 is a computer with two PPC 970s in it.

      "Other than that, half of the rest are already available on PC, and have been for years."

      Talk about RDF...

    5. Re:You forgot something by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      He's talking about dual processor G5s, not Dual Core G5s...

    6. Re:You forgot something by PureCreditor · · Score: 1

      > Reality Distortion Field.

      I believe that's formally known as "Microsoft Ad Campaign."

    7. Re:You forgot something by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Dual G5's don't exist?

      Somebody better walk down to my datacenter and explain that to the Xserves I installed a year ago.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    8. Re:You forgot something by Scyblade · · Score: 1

      Apple-flavored Kool-aid. (Getting Tiger today)

    9. Re:You forgot something by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Um...I've had a dual G5 1.8 GHz for over a year now.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    10. Re:You forgot something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relativistically, isn't it only observable by another, not the self? ;-)

  18. Excellent. by unixbugs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I, for one, welcome our new Feline overlords.

    As a long time Slackware and FreeBSD user, I'm just waiting for a good check to come in so I can get a Mac. My problem is that I'm afraid I'll find it so cool and so much better that I will drop my beloved OS's and lose interest.

    As far as Microsoft is concerned, well, they kissed my ass years ago when I dropped out around Windows 98. If there is ever a chance for Mac's to become more affordable I do not see a future for Microsoft. They can't sue us for NOT using their shit. Heh.

    --
    You are about to give someone a piece of your mind, something which you can ill afford...
    1. Re:Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >They can't sue us for NOT using their shit.
      They'll find a way.

    2. Re:Excellent. by millahtime · · Score: 1

      They can't sue us for NOT using their shit.

      The the good old US of A they probubally could sue you for not using their stuff. They may not win but could you afford it? They have 50 billion in the bank. That can buy you a lot of lawyers, judges and politicians.

    3. Re:Excellent. by doon · · Score: 1
      As a long time Slackware and FreeBSD user, I'm just waiting for a good check to come in so I can get a Mac. My problem is that I'm afraid I'll find it so cool and so much better that I will drop my beloved OS's and lose interest.

      I am the same as you, longtime slack and FreeBSD user. My main day to day computer is now a 17"AL powerbook. My x86 PCS at home all still run Slackware or FreeBSD (well and an OpenBSD firewall), and I find myself using them more in server roles. I do find myself using the powerbook most of the time though. I can write code, do my e-mail, export my displays from other computers around my house to it, etc. Also the reason I like it so much is that now that I am older and have less time to mess with stuff. The OS just works on a portable. Whereas sometimes getting Slack or the lastest version on FreeBSD to work on a laptop was an adventure.

      So i guess after my ramblings, I like MacOSX, I love my powerbook, I don't see myself replacing my FreeBSD based Server farms with XServes anytime soon. So my desktop is now OSX, but my server and older laptops are still Slack/BSD

      --
      To E-mail me, replace the first period in my domain with an @
    4. Re:Excellent. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I actually came at it from the other end. I bought some Xservers to replace Gentoo Linux servers handling email and our domain. In the bundle they recommended we purchase an iBook to manage the equipment with.

      Now, you will pry my Macs away from me when you can pull them from my cold, dead hands. Seriously, when you have to support 200 users, and you stop having to manually restart MySQL replication to pass directory info, it's a good thing. Being able to tell the helpdesk guys "just create the new account yourself" is nice too.

      Now, we still have a pile of Linux boxen for firewalling, dialup servers, and other core functions. So I still am one with the Penguin. In your case, you really aren't abandoning BSD, Darwin is BSD. Your are just switching distros.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a long time Slackware and FreeBSD user, I'm just waiting for a good check to come in so I can get a Mac. My problem is that I'm afraid I'll find it so cool and so much better that I will drop my beloved OS's and lose interest.

      Don't fear that. I've replaced my FreeBSD desktop machine with a Mac Mini a month ago and did not regret it yet. Yeah, you'll be using a machine and an OS built and sold by people that do not deserve much sympathy, actually. When I see Steve Jobs sueing left and right and all the NDA-nonsense around Tiger, I do not feel very good giving money to them.

      On the other hand, Mac OS X is build around a lot of Open Source software and what it really needs is more people coming from a Open Source background. So, come on! We need you. Linux and *BSD are coming along nicely meanwhile. Come over and fight the evil side from within! And compared to Microsoft Apple is still the better half of the evil side and more often than not OS X feels just good and not at all that closed. There's hope yet.

  19. No Tiger in Tiger by kherr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Java 5 (Tiger) is not included in Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger). But Apple's got it under development and I'd suspect there'll be a Java update to Java 5 within a short period. Apple's been making test builds available to developers.

    1. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Apple should make them available to developers that want to risk the "beta" nature of the 1.5 JDK.

      After all, why do I want to pony up $600 for Apple's developer program when I'm really interested in Java development? (Now that 1.5 no longer depends on a beta OS release?)

      Apple is doing well, but as Java is a big part of my needs, and having 1.5 available becomes more important, I'd at least like to have the option to start working with it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    2. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by Undertaker43017 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I like my Mac, but now, until Apple releases Java 5, I will have to move to a Linux machine for development.

    3. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by robbieduncan · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a Java 5 (or 1.5 or whatever it's called) preview available to developers if they have the correct level of access. I believe it's only open to Select and Premier developers at the moment.

    4. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by Undertaker43017 · · Score: 1

      So I pay ~$100 for Tiger, which is required to run Java 5. Then I pay ~$500 for a beta version of Java 5!

      Apple should be allowing free access to beta versions of Java. If I want to run beta sw, that should be my choice.

      I really wish Sun would step to the plate and start offering Java for OS X, because Apple has proven that Java is not a priority for them.

    5. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      That was my point - why should I have to pay $500 for Java 1.5 beta? Since Tiger's released, allow me to play with the beta. Who knows, I might even help in finding bugs. (Considering my work involves multi-threading and the new concurrent package, odds are high I might find a bug or two).

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    6. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by robbieduncan · · Score: 1

      It says at Apple's Java FAQ the Java 1.5 requires a beta version of Tiger. As that Tiger version is only available to seed key holders it makes sense that the Java Preview is only available to seed key holders too. Once Tiger is officially available (tomorrow) the Preview Release may well be opened up to non-paying developers. Also note that this is Preview Release 7. It's not necessarily of beta quality yet. I imagine release 1 was very alpha!

      So in summary: wait till Tiger is officially available to bitch about a lack of software on it!

    7. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Since Tiger's released"

      There is the misunderstanding. Tiger (MacOS X 10.4) is officially released tomorrow. As of right now, technically the only people who have it are accidental early deliveries and developers who've *already* paid $500 and are reportedly getting Java 1.5 beta for no additional charge.

      Once MacOS X 10.4 *is* actually released, then you might have a valid complaint, but even then I'd give them a couple of days, at least. They're probably kind of busy right now.

    8. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, Apple mostly has been pretty good with Java support. That they're slow with this one is exceptional.

      And I'm saying this as someone who doesn't even like Java, especially pre-1.5; the worst of both worlds wrt. static and dynamic typing. With generics, you can finally at least avoid potentially failing type narrowing casts.

    9. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is another phrase for Apple's Preview Release, it's called Final Candidate, not Alpha. I fully expect Apple to offer Java 1.5 to Tiger users via the software update feature within two weeks. They've been working on the Beta for almost a year.

      Everybody, just relax, take a dep breath. It's all good.

    10. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      "Java 5 (Tiger) is not included in Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger)."

      Damn, I really wanted to see Tiger on Tiger action.

      I suppose I'll just have to settle for the Discovery channel...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    11. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by robbieduncan · · Score: 1

      It's available now that Tiger is available http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/java2se50re lease1.html

      Happy?

    12. Re:No Tiger in Tiger by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I'll have to hop out and pick up tiger....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  20. Ummmm... by Seoulstriker · · Score: 1

    Tiger still hasn't been released yet, and so we know that these reviewers have advanced copies to review. I'd imaigne that they would have it in their possession at least since golden master was declared.

    --
    I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
    1. Re:Ummmm... by Ageless · · Score: 1

      Tiger was accidentally (maybe) released earlier this week. Thousands of people already have fully legit retail copies of it.

  21. Sounds great, get it out there! by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple, now raking in profits from its iPod, should seriously consider lowering their prices on their high-end machines to gain market share. Currently APPL is trading at $36.35 +0.40 (1.11%) a share and the stock has gone up consistenty since 2003 when it was around $10 a share. Now is the time for them to make some moves.
    If Tiger indeed blows away XP, so they should try to advertise it more, get it out to as many people as possible in order to increase their popularity and inspire more people to use and develop Apple software. If everyone had a better alternative to Windows for say just a fraction more in price, people would start buying it. The iPod has already convinced people Apple is a good brand, all they need is a price incentive to switch to Apple PCs.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by pentae · · Score: 1

      Didnt Apple just release new changes to the G5, they are coming out cheaper and with a minimum of 2 x G5 Processors?

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/ 27/145241&tid=174&tid=3

    2. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If Tiger indeed blows away XP

      Good G*d, man, in grasping the Tiger's tail let's not lose our grasp of Reality.

      OS X may be better than Redmond.*, but 95% of computer users and corporations would rather have a better OS ~that they can install on their current hardware~.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    3. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand... they're not in the same market as Microsoft. Apple primarily makes money off of hardware and are targeting a small but profiting corner of the market.

      Why sell twice the machines at half the price ? That's double the amount of work for the same profit.

      --
      Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    4. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why sell twice the machines at half the price ? That's double the amount of work for the same profit.
      Why? Simply to gain market share and get the word out there to the average PC user that there IS a better alternative to Windows. I guess they can also rest on their Laurels, but the world would be a better place with more Apples.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    5. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by jbrw · · Score: 1

      As someone else pointed out, their CPU sales went up ~40% last year, which is a nice number. Probably best to maintain similar growth for a few years, rather than a going for a one-off surge by subsidising the CPUs with iPod profits...

      Assuming, ofcourse, that they could ramp up production sufficiently in the first place.

    6. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Peldor · · Score: 1
      But as everyone knows, Apple doesn't make PCs. They make Macs.

      That's a bigger hurdle than you think.

    7. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Momoru · · Score: 4, Informative

      Currently APPL is trading at $36.35 +0.40 (1.11%) a share and the stock has gone up consistenty since 2003 when it was around $10 a share.

      It should be mentioned that these prices are not comparable directly since Apple split their stock. The current pre-split price is over $70, so its a 7 times gain, not just a 3 times.

    8. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by L.Bob.Rife · · Score: 1

      Why sell twice the machines at half the price ? That's double the amount of work for the same profit.

      Marketshare.

      A larger percentage of the market can mean more than a linear increase in profit.

    9. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why sell twice the machines at half the price ? That's double the amount of work for the same profit.

      oh my... how to say this nicely... umm... you're a moron. Half the price and you're selling at a loss.

    10. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by plopez · · Score: 1

      that they can install on their current hardware

      I beg to differ. I will predict that when Longhorn comes out you will need 64 bits for it to run reasonably well. Tiger, on the other hand, seems to be running fine on existing hardware. ANd anecdotal evidence suggest each upgrade to OSX has been more efficient and faster, even on old hardware.

      I find that when I do a complete accounting that my iBook is the least expensive computer I have ever owned (no need for add-ons or constant cleanup/tweaking at my normal bill rate of $40/hr.). The reasons most people stick with Windows is not rational, it is emotional or they do not do a complete accounting of TCO.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    11. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by sammy+baby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's some evidence to suggest that they're headed in this direction already. The last time their Powerbook line got a bump, they also got a mild price cut. Their Cinema Displays also just had a mild price cut, bringing their average cost from "an arm and a leg" to "a hand and everything below the knee."

      Of course, once their sales hit a certain level, their incentive to keep dropping prices goes away, and there's only so much growth a company like Apple can reasonably expect to support in a given period. So, in other words, ignore me completely.

    12. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by syphax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It sure would be nice if Macs were more affordable.

      But Apple seems to be of the opinion that they can maximize profits by maintaining good margins with relatively small market share, rather than trying to increase market share substantially with much lower margins (at least for computers- portable music players is a totally different story; Apple seems to be able to command pretty good margins *and* high market share; good for them).

      It's too bad, b/c the world could use more Macs, but it's a sane strategy. Apple has picked their niche and is nailing it. It'd be insane for them to try to challenge Dell and/or MS head-on; they'd get crushed (again).

      That said, I will watch the evolution of the Mac Mini, presumably poised to be the (cliched) household digital hub, with much interest.

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    13. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Apple has managed to stay in business for 25 years. They have managed to turn a profit for the last 5 years. This is especially good performance given the nosedive the technology industry has been during the same period.

      I dare say they know what they are doing. That's like saying Daimler Benz should drop the price on their high end cars to compete with GM.

      They aren't even in the same Market.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    14. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by water-and-sewer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OS X may be better than Redmond.*, but 95% of computer users and corporations would rather have a better OS ~that they can install on their current hardware~.

      Not true. That's true for geeks like us. Most people have absolutely no what an operating system IS, and upgrade their lifestyle by buying a new computer. I am currently finishing a masters degree with a bunch of people that complain they need a new computer, because "this one just doesn't work anymore." They're using P4s and Windows 2000, and are going to upgrade to XP, not aware you don't have to get rid of your existing hardware. For that matter, they could speed up their machines by simply reformating all the spyware off and starting with a fresh system, but no. They're going to Dell.com to pick out a "better" machine.
      Thank God for those people. I get lots of good quality, 1 year old hardware from them for cheap. Not my fault they didn't take the time to learn about their computers.

      --
      If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
    15. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Realistically, the only machine that's overpriced is the PowerMac, particularly the uniprocessor version (1.8Ghz, 600Mhz FSB, 256MB RAM, 80GB Hard disk, no monitor, $50 graphics card (FX5200) and all for $1500+). The dual processor versions, as well as having two G5s, also have extremely fast FSBs (1Ghz in the top-end model).

      However every other part of the market is nicely catered for:

      You've got the Mac Mini starting at $500, the eMac starting at $850, and for people who like a bit of style, the iMac starting at $1300. You can add an extra $75 to all of these to upgrade to 512MB of RAM, but otherwise that's it. The software bundle is quite respectable, and if AppleWorks doesn't do it for you, you can get iWork for another $80.

      For the overall quality of the system you get, that's pretty decent.

      All those systems are rubbish for games of course, but Macs aren't made for gamers. One thing I'd like that change is the graphics card in the low-end MacMini and eMac models, the Radeon 9200. Core Image doesn't support it, but does support the Geforece FX5200 which is only about $15 dearer in retail.

      The fact is, that for the first time in some while, Apple actually has a fairly decent spread of hardware for all the major markets. The low-end PowerMac's a bit of a joke, but that's the only issue in an otherwise respectable store.

      As for iPod sales, that markets going to turn down pretty soon (that kind of growth isn't sustainable), and I suspect it's already subsidising the iTMS. Apple Corp. doesn't take chances: why do you think it's still not dead after 25 years of dying? Further, they've a huge internal R&D department which most likely sucks up a large amount of cash earning through hardware as well as software; they don't see the economies of scale that Microsoft does.

    16. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      That's like saying Daimler Benz should drop the price on their high end cars to compete with GM.
      That may be true if there were only 2 car manufacturers in the world, but alas, there are not. Apple could easily produce less-expensive Macs in the hopes to gain new users, and eventually, helping the masses with a better overall OS and computing experience.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    17. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by bushidocoder · · Score: 1
      Your argument is based on the theory that the cost of Windows stays the same.

      Repeat after me - APPLE CAN NEVER WIN THE MARKET SHARE WAR. Its impossible. Microsoft can literally operate for 10 years without bringing in a single dollar of revenue at current operating costs based on their cash in reserve - granted, they never would because the shareholders want their money, but the point is if Apple ever started beating desktop Window sales in price, the cost of Windows will drop substantially. XP paid for itself years ago, and right now every sale is a somewhat marginal cost of support and overhead and almost pure profit. If Apple drops to a zero profit sale point, Microsoft can technically pay users to use Windows - if MS subsidized the cost of PC sales by 100 dollars and threw in Windows for free (exactly what they did to break into the Smartphone market) they could run Apple under the table and then raise prices in several years after Apple's reserves are depleted. I'm not sure of Microsoft's exact financials, but I suspect even if they did subsidize the cost of PCs, they could still be profitable overall based on server and office sales. In fact, the surest sign that Microsoft is unafraid of the current positioning of Tiger and OpenOffice is the fact that the price of Windows and Office hasn't dipped yet.

      BMW will never steal Hyundai's market by underselling them - BMW beats Hyundai by making BMWs.

    18. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Now, remove "Apple" and "Macs" and replace the name with some other manufacturer and product line. Hmmm. You can insert just about everyone from HP to Linspire and get the same meaning.

      For all your complaints, we are talking about a difference of $100 at most for between Apple's offerings and equivilent products. That's the difference between being a cheapass and buying what you really want in mose cases.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    19. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      The car analogy is bad, there are several really good car manufacturers, but only 3 widely-used operating systems.
      It is just a question of marketing and advertising. Show an ad with a new G5 and show all of its capabilities in the ad, not just some abstract view of how it will change the world, or break away from the clones.
      From Apple.com: "Professionals need superior tools to produce designs, music, high-definition video or the next scientific breakthrough. The new Power Mac G5 line extends as far as you require. Two 64-bit G5 processors reaching top speeds of 2.7GHz, room for up to 8GB of main memory, pro performance graphics cards and ultrahigh-bandwidth system architecture will give you more results than systems costing twice as much. Dual processing starts at $1999." (TOO EXPENSIVE for most people, start this at $1200 and maybe you will gain market share) I guarantee you people would be lining up to buy these G5s if they would just drop the price a bit.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    20. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by aclarke · · Score: 1
      BTW, it's not Daimler Benz, but DaimlerChrysler. A company which makes vehicles like the $14,000 Dodge Neon and the similarly priced (on the low end) PT Cruiser.

      GM, on the other hand, sells vehicles like the almost $50k Volvo S80 and the $75,000 Cadillac XLR, which certainly is aimed to compete with the Mercedes Benz SL. So while you could say that Mercedes-Benz and Saturn aren't really in the same market, Dodge & Buick certainly are.

    21. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by ballookey · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, just 3 times. After a split, all prices are adjusted for the split. Back in 2003 Apple was in the 20's, but in order to make meaningful evaluations, they adjusted that number after the split. Otherwise, relative comparisons would be a nightmare.

    22. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    23. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Momoru · · Score: 1

      ah you are right, though if you go back to january 03, it was at low 14's, and right before the split it was almost at 80, so you still could have made around 600% profit!

    24. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your analogy would be correct if 95% of the population were driving GM cars. As for me, I drive a Honda, and I'd take it over a Benz any day.

    25. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by drew · · Score: 1

      this may be an issue for corporate users, but most home users, apple's real target market, usually only upgrade their version of windows when they buy a new computer. so to most home windows users, upgrading to moc os x would be little different from upgrading to windows longhorn.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    26. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Why do they need to gain marketshare?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    27. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Uh, have you heard of the Mac mini? It's pretty inexpensive.

      Oh, you meant that you want to spend less money when you buy a dual G5! Right, now I understand.

      Don't hold your breath.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    28. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Apple, now raking in profits from its iPod, should seriously consider lowering their prices on their high-end machines to gain market share.

      It's not the high-end machines that Apple could gain market share with, as the Mac Faithful will still buy dual-G5 towers and 30" Cinema Displays whether they're $2000 or $3500.

      It's the entry-level hardware that Apple should be cutting prices on to attract new Mac users. Et voila, Mac mini!

      I do wonder why there has been so little mainstream marketing for OS X since 10.0 came out years ago, as that is clearly one of the biggest advantages Apple has over Microsoft right now. Longhorn won't ship for years, and a lot of people will be buying new computers in the meantime. Why isn't Apple pursing this market share more aggressively?

    29. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by SilicaiMan · · Score: 1
      Currently APPL is trading at $36.35

      No. APPL is trading at $0.01.

    30. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Guarantee? That word means something specific. That means that you're willing to be financially liable if you're wrong.

      Now, call me crazy, but I'm guessing that it costs Apple a bit more than $1200 to make a dual-processor G5 system. See, unlike Dell, Apple has to actually pay engineers and designers. And software people.

      Apple does not need marketshare to survive, and prosper.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    31. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by jafac · · Score: 1

      No.

      I believe that their high-end machines are defineatley appropriately priced.

      The dual 2ghz G5 I bought a year and a half ago for $2000 was the best $2000 I ever spent in my whole entire life. I will be beating on that poor thing 10 years from now. The equivalently priced PC from any vendor is crap.

      Their flatscreens are way overpriced - but nobody's forced to buy one (except on an iMac).

      Apple needs to lower it's prices on it's iMac line, and frankly the Mini is overpriced (considering the low RAM and crappy slow hard drive).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    32. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by glockNine · · Score: 1

      A larger percentage of the market can mean more than a linear increase in profit.

      Or a more than linear decrease in profit if you miscalculate and overestimate the demand for your product.

      That said, I think that many people want a computer that Just Works(TM). If word starts to get around that Macs easy an unintimidating for novice users, than demand for Macs could rise very quickly. As of now, most computer users have no idea what Apple or Linux is, so there is potentially a huge market for Apple.

    33. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by CaptDeuce · · Score: 1

      Apple, now raking in profits from its iPod, should seriously consider lowering their prices on their high-end machines to gain market share. Currently APPL is trading at $36.35 ...

      There's a few problems with your suggestion:

      • There's no conceivable advantage for Apple -- or most any other company -- to cut prices on their low volume, high margin, professional hardware. It is extremely unlikely that any resulting increase in market share would ever offset the loss in profits, even in the long term.
      • Based on collective features, Macs are already very competitively priced. This is easily demonstrated by configuring a Mac at the Apple store and try to match the configuration on Dell's site. The price difference is typically small and will favor Macs more than some people may think. A major reason for this is that most Mac model base configurations have more standard features though this too changes over time. For instance, at various times, SCSI, FireWire, Wi-Fi, DVI were were standard on many or all Macs before they were on Wintel boxen.

      • By themselves, modest price changes for hardware -- which is essentially what you are suggesting -- are fairly irrelevant to much, if any, changes in desktop computer market share. This is because there is no one "desktop computer market", just a multitude of niche markets. Of course some niches are larger than others.

      • Apple's biggest market share is in publishing, graphics, video, etc. These market segments already use the high-end machines where modest price changes are irrelevant to market share. Much more significant is cost/performance changes which stimulates hardware upgrades.

      • Again, in the professional machine niche, hardware cost is almost irrelevant; switching software would potentially be much more costly. Considering that the enterprise market is "the big one", the changeover costs for software are likely to be huge, especially when you consider that the most common bundle of software is called Office.

      The iPod has already convinced people Apple is a good brand, all they need is a price incentive to switch to Apple PCs.

      Apple has already done this. It's called the Mac mini.

      --
      "Where's my other sock?" - A. Einstein
    34. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

      By "95% of computer users and corporations", I meant 95% of the market, which means... Redmondows.

      Thank God for those people. I get lots of good quality, 1 year old hardware from them for cheap. Not my fault they didn't take the time to learn about their computers.

      Wotta bonanza! Can you hook me up with this silly yuppy consumerist trash? ;o)

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    35. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by bushidocoder · · Score: 1
      I think they could use some price changes, but they need to be careful - Dropping the price of G5 workstations will just prompt a change in price in x64 workstations and an increase in XP marketing.

      Where I think Apple needs to drop prices is in its Powerbook line (I'm not just saying that because I want one) - maybe between 5 and 10%. One of the more subtle things the iPod has done is to give Apple the perception of being the master of the mobile lifestyle and that's a place they can beat out Dell and HP.

      If I were in a position of power at Apple, I would merge the iBook and the Powerbook lines - keep the iBook as-is for the most part, but give it the brushed metal exterior that is universally loved and offer a 64mb graphics card version. Apple's lower cost laptops should be able to ride on the Powerbook's name and stop being thought of as some ignored bastard child.

      Break into the PVR market, not by releasing your own PVR which is probably a loss game, but rather by finding a partner like Tivo and forcing them to treat Apple's as first class citizens.

      Run a marketing campaign "A powerbook in every bag". Consumers like laptops better than desktops, and most studies show that the Powerbook is the best perceived value in the laptop market.

      Steal Microsoft's tablet pc idea - Tablet PC is honestly a fantastic system and MS should be given credit for its implementation. Steal the idea. BillG can't force it down people's throats, but Steve Jobs can sell a tablet powerbook and by reviving the old Newton trademark, probably convince people that Apple was the real innovator in this space.

      Find a way to integrate with either the Nintendo Revolution or the PS3 - The Xbox2 will beat both of them to market, but both of them will probably beat Longhorn to market. If you can get onboard with streaming music from iTunes on your pc to your console you can in a single move reverse years of (accurate) perceptions about Apple's relationships with gaming. I know you don't like playing games personally, Steve, but games grossed more than box office did last year - stop ignoring them.

      Lastly, stop suing people. Seriously. There's no need to be a fraction as paranoid as you guys are. You're like North Korea with better haircuts.

    36. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by anonicon · · Score: 1

      "For all your complaints, we are talking about a difference of $100 at most for between Apple's offerings and equivilent products."

      Hhahaahahahahahahhaaa. You're really serious, aren't you?

      Keep drinking that Kool-Aid.

      Chuck

    37. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by rsborg · · Score: 1
      Why sell twice the machines at half the price ? That's double the amount of work for the same profit.

      Worse... its more like double the work for the same revenue. With fixed overhead, that means either much less profit or worse: net loss. My wife's MBA class stressed this motto:

      When in doubt, raise the price
      Apparently, that (generally) works for good reason.
      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    38. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by mrklin · · Score: 1

      No, you still do not get it. What you see as $14 stock price now was $28 pre-split then. So the price is still ~3x ($28 2003 -> $80 2005) and your profit ~2x. Everything is split adjusted.

    39. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are only a handful of PC companies with a larger market share than Apple - some of them haven't turned a profit in a while. To be sure Apple's relative market share is small compared to all of them combined, but profits are not combined across companies in a market sector..

      Gateway and the IBM PC operation spring to mind as having attained higher share over the last few years, but unprofitably.

    40. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Momoru · · Score: 1

      no... look here. The price in Jan 03 was 14.36, the split adjusted price is 7.18 .

    41. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GM, on the other hand, sells vehicles like the almost $50k Volvo S80 and the $75,000 Cadillac XLR, which certainly is aimed to compete with the Mercedes Benz SL. So while you could say that Mercedes-Benz and Saturn aren't really in the same market, Dodge & Buick certainly are.

      GM doesn't sell Volvos. Ford does.

    42. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with that claim. Care to back yourself up with some numbers demonstrating how that isn't true?

      The important thing to remember is "equivilent products". Building an x86 box yourself doesn't count.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    43. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by dr00g911 · · Score: 1

      Might be 'arm and a leg' prices, but looking into the 23" aluminum cased Cinema Display in front of me, I can honestly say that it's worth every penny of the $2k I spent for it, and the nicest monitor I've ever worked on (with the exception of the Apple 30").

      Most people who buy LCDs these days couldn't give a shit about accurate color. I'm not one of those people, and I'm a very very happy guy with spot on color fidelity and non-tired eyes at the end of the day.

    44. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      Actually, that would likely drive the price of the stock down. One of the reasons analysts give for downgrading the stock recently is that Apple is selling more low-end, low-cost (and thus, low-margin) items. Take a look at this article from a few days ago, particularly the first bullet item. Analysts are unhappy because even though Apple is selling more iPods, they are selling more of the cheaper, low-margin items. Not to mention, total iPod revenue is down. So, selling lower cost items is not necessarily going to drive up market share. It could just eat into sales of the more profitable stuff without leading to growth.

      Not to say the analysts are right and Apple is purusing a bad stragey, but it is not always a good direction to go.

    45. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by MasonMcD · · Score: 1

      Well, if all the gomers out there are right and you can get a kick ass machine for some pocket lint and paperclips, *and* OS X server has no per-seat licensing *and* there's no product activation, why not get a test bed set up, whip up some java-based workflows, or drag and drop with Apple's new automator tool, roll it out a bit at a time (secretaries first, then marketing, then accounting, then blah blah blah) and just keep some Windows boxen around for legacy stuff.

    46. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      Yeah: I wouldn't say that the monitors are overpriced, rather that I just can't justify the expense. Still, there's some disconnect when Apple says, "look! A cheap computer that runs great! Now go somewhere else for a monitor."

    47. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Not if you use, oh, any stock tracker, where it annotates the split price vs. the price at the time. Apple's stock has completely skyrocketed, why the insistence that it hasn't? Did you have a tip to buy and pass it up? :-)

    48. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by TheJakeR · · Score: 1

      FYI: Volvo is owned by Ford, not GM.

      WRT Daimler Benz vs. Daimler Chrysler, I beleive that EvilTwinSkippy was referring only to cars bearing the Mercedes Benz logo, not to all cars manufactured by the parent company. His comparison is valid in that light.

      These comparisons are wavering between hardware and software. Apple is in both industries, and we should be making distinct analogies for each.

      In the hardware industry, the car analogy is very good. Dell is like GM or DaimlerChrysler -- huge, lots of variety, covering the whole market. HP, IBM/Lenovo, Fujitsu/Siemens, etc. match roughly with Ford, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan. You can spend a little, or you can spend a lot, and for the most part you get what you pay for. Apple is like BMW. For their low-end model, you spend a fair amount of money, and you get something quite good. For their high-end model, you spend a lot, and you get a very, very good machine.

      In the operating system industry, there are really only two competitors: Microsoft and Apple. I don't mean to disregard Linux and its brethren, but mentioning it would be like mentioning Bugatti in a discussion of US car market share. :-)

      -Jake

    49. Re:Sounds great, get it out there! by aclarke · · Score: 1
      Hmm, good point on the Volvo/Ford connection. I'm not sure what I was smoking there. I must have gotten mixed up with Saab for a moment.

      Yeah, overall I agree with the person's post in that there's no reason for Apple to feel obligated to compete across the market. I also re-read the original post and noticed that it mentioned that Mercedes shouldn't drop the price on their HIGH END cars to compete with GM, so I'm an idiot and my response was completely pointless.

  22. Virii doesn't make you look clever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...incidence of spam/virii in the Windows world...

    The plural of virus is viruses.

    Writing "virri" doesn't make you look clever, educated people will laugh at you.

    1. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when does using wikipedia make you educated.

      Correcting other people's spelling in an argument is something that you only do when you have no meaningful response.

    2. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Writing "virri" doesn't make you look clever, educated people will laugh at you.

      And you used a comma instead of a colon. Ha ha ha!

    3. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by Chucker23N · · Score: 1

      Indeed, "virri" won't make you look clever at all.

      But there's still nothing wrong with using "virii" as plural for "virus", as the Wikipedia article you link to says itself.

    4. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by boarder8925 · · Score: 1
      And you used a comma instead of a colon.
      Actually, a semicolon was needed there. Using a colon would've said why he wouldn't look clever, and the second half doesn't make much sense.
    5. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by Chucker23N · · Score: 1

      You mean "semi-colon".

      SCNR

    6. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for it being the plural of 'virius' instead of 'virus', of course.

    7. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Writing "virri" doesn't make you look clever, educated people will laugh at you.

      Yeah, I'd say you're right on that one.

    8. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cactus::Cacti
      Virus::Virii

      Close enough, don't bitch about silly things like that. I use virii in common speech when I discuss it, so what is wrong with typing it?

      Google was once just a name, now it's a verb etc due to it's now accepted meaning as a verb (i.e. "to search").

      In fact, if you look up the word "word" in a decent dictionary you'll note that it is any spoken or otherwise communicated utterence, symbol, or series of symbols that conveys a meaning.

    9. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      Cactus::Cacti
      Virus::Virii


      That's what kills me. This little analogy doesn't even work! If cactus becomes cacti, then virus become viri, not virii! The fact is, using a Latin plural is stupid for virus (even if you use it when you say it) becaus in Latin virus doesn't even decline; the Latin plural of virus is still virus.

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    10. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let me guess: if you were in a bar on your own, you'd order a martinus, right?

      Ah, old jokes...I'm working towards becoming one.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    11. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Viruses" doesn't make you look clever either. Virus has no plural.

      Learn to speak plain Latin or shut your face.

    12. Re:Virii doesn't make you look clever. by Chucker23N · · Score: 1

      No. "viri" is aleady plural for something else. RTFWPA.

  23. Is there really a reason to switch? by sehryan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would love to make the switch, but I am not sure I could justify it. I know it is all subjective, but what is a good reason to switch away from WinXP? Looking for real reasons to switch, not trolls or flames.

    For reference, I don't have problems with virii, my system never crashes, and all of my main programs (mainly design programs from Adobe and Macromedia) run very nicely. So what would I gain from switching?

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    1. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      how much effort does it take you to keep your system clean/crash free? Im in the same boat at work (write windows apps, kind of have to run windows for that). I have linux/windows at home. For me, its just "something new" that i want to try. Hopefully i can save 500 bones in the next few months.

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    2. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by zpok · · Score: 4, Informative

      Initially, you'd be less productive (say one week, tops) and afterwards you'll probably be a lot more productive.

      That's the top one reason I always keep hearing from multimedia professionals who've switched. What makes them more productive? Workflow management, which seems to be easier in OS X, better handling of files and more freedom and consistency in setting up the perfect work environment. This includes scanning, printing and all color-proofing issues.

      For some things it's the difference between one click versus four. For some things it's simply features not available on Windows.

      And today it's a lot easier to set keyboard shortcuts just the way you want them and adapt your workflow to your taste. So switching has for the most part become trivial.

      I'd say coupled with the cross platform apps you use, there's at least not a compelling reason not to switch. If you personally would gain a lot by switching is another issue.

      I know, a pretty wooly answer. In the end it's down to your preferences and way of working. Best talk with fellow designers, see what they think about it, and see if what they say applies to your situation.

      DON'T ask the geeks here at /. they'll bog you down with arguments that have nothing to do with your reality ;-)

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    3. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Jackdaw+Rookery · · Score: 1

      Why are you asking?

      If WinXP works for you, great. Stick with it and go about your day happy. The fact you are asking shows there is something making you consider a change - even if it is just curiosity.

      Know yourself, why you are asking, before posting to ./ or you're sailing close to flame and troll land.

    4. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by snowdropper · · Score: 1

      I was using software from those same companies on my PC before I got my mac. I did meticulous research into this purchase, because as a student at the time it was a lot of money (still is) - I had heard all about the 'workflow' advantages... and thought yeah whatever, Flash is Flash right? Wrong. Your workflow really does benefit from the OSX environment. That alone is enough reason to switch in my opinion. The software from these companies does differ slightly between platforms, and I must say that I like the way OSX handles windows etc, and expose helps a hell of a lot. Core Image should boost the working experience even more.

      In short, go to an Apple store, and try it out. Ring ahead and ask if they can put your software on a machine for you to check out. Then decide for yourself.

    5. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by nordicfrost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, the main reason I use Macs and MacOS isn'nt blazing speed differences and OMG!!! It just works!!! statments. although I have yet to install a driver to get something om my PowerBook to work. I don't know how they do it, but most things seem to not need a driver or use a preinstalled driver of some sort.

      I use Macs because they make me efficient. I feel more comfortable sith a Mac and lots and lots of nifty solutions make it a better platform for me. An example: When I work in Photoshop, all I need to do in order to view all the open pictures is to take the mouse in the lower right corner. Expose kicks in and I can see every picture I'm working on. If I want to see all the open apps and switch to another, mous in the lower left corner. Another example; everything is drag'n'drop. I'm composing an email and need a picture from a website? Just drag the pic from safari over in the email totally seamlessly. And both the email client and safari are preinstalled. Easy-peasy.

      There is so much to tell, but just try it. If it is good for you use it. If not, don't.

    6. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by yodaj007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you don't switch, I'll call you a dumb poopie-head.

      --
      These aren't the sigs you're looking for.
    7. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

      There is no reason to switch if what you have works for you and you have no problems, as you state. If, furthermore, it costs you little effort to keep it that way, you're golden.

      Now consider this scenario: in 1-2 years when it is time to get new hardware, or new design software, you are going to be switching anyway. That is the time to consider will you switch to Mac OS X 10.5, or to Longhorn (if it is out, windows XP second edition if it is not)?

    8. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by _|()|\| · · Score: 2, Informative
      I would love to make the switch, but I am not sure I could justify it. I know it is all subjective, but what is a good reason to switch away from WinXP?

      I can't tell you why to switch, although the fact that you "would love to" is probably a start.

      I got an iBook G4 at home, because I was intrigued by OS X, and because it was actually competitive on features and price for its part of the market. I bought it shortly before I became more interested in digital photography, and iPhoto has been a nice bonus. No regrets, so far.

      I got an iMac G5 at work, because I've increasingly been doing Unix development, and it was cumbersome working on a Linux box via SSH and SMB. I seriously considered switching from Windows to Linux, but there was a comfort level with OS X that I've never quite reached with Linux. Also, I wanted a new computer, and I thought it would be easier to get a 20" iMac approved than a desktop and comparable monitor.

      I haven't completely switched, but I wouldn't be surprised if I never buy another PC. I'm seriously considering a Power Mac G5 at home. Depending on how much we spend on our next house, it may sit next to a 30" Apple Cinema Display.

    9. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Snocone · · Score: 1

      For reference, I don't have problems with virii, my system never crashes, and all of my main programs (mainly design programs from Adobe and Macromedia) run very nicely. So what would I gain from switching?

      That you can tie internal functions of Adobe and Macromedia and most other professional applications into workflow scripts using the applications' AppleScript dictionaries in ways that just aren't possible using any non-AppleScript technology would strike any true geek as a compelling reason to be using OS X, my friend.

    10. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so you know, drag and drop like you mentioned (browser to mailer) is available in Windows too (for half a decade, at least).

    11. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Another example; everything is drag'n'drop. I'm composing an email and need a picture from a website? Just drag the pic from safari over in the email totally seamlessly.

      Just checked, and the same happens here at work with IE and Outlook. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    12. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by nordicfrost · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We use Groupwise at work, doesn't work there. But there's something interesing about your statement. You didn't know it until now. In the Mac world, there's this wierd feeling you get that "this probably works" and you try it. Usually it works. It is difficult to explain, but the global drag and drop feature is so thightly integrated that one tend to use it. In Windows, it works in some situations and not others. I don't have the time to find out what apps / situations that can have DND to make them more efficient. In Mac, you just do it.
      Sorry for the bad explanation, but the feeling is difficult to describe.

    13. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by PureCreditor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > DON'T ask the geeks here at /. they'll bog you down with arguments that have nothing to do with your reality ;-)

      Totally agreed. They will claim KDE and Gnome is the holy grail of desktop computing. Sorry to disappoint you, but it's a far cry from Aqua. KDE and Gnome still requires the console for more than trivial tasks. Aqua, on the other hand, manages to hide the BSD-beast that's doing the crunch work.

      as a point of reference, I majored in CompSci, and have used a variety of Win, Mac, Unix/Linux.

      Windows - Grandma-usable GUI, and grandma-crashable kernel

      Unix/Linux - Super powerful, and only gurus can appreciate its GUI. Most the Linux desktops I've seen are covered with - (1) a web browser, (2) xmms, (3) a huge console.

      Mac - best of both worlds

    14. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Informative

      So what would I gain from switching?

      I use Adobe and Macromedia applications regularly on both systems. First, you need to make sure your particular applications are well supported on the mac, or it is a non-starter. Adobe has several projects where they have mostly abandoned the mac.

      Asssuming you do not use any of these the main advantages are:

      Better GUI - UI elements have better feedback and make a lot more sense. (buttons pulse and when the system is working stay lit so you the system registered the click. Windows UI elements don't provide feedback and leave you guessing. Also, dialogue boxes don't say "Cancel/OK" most have useful titles.

      System Services - in any native app with 1-3 clicks I can lookup a word or acronym online, translate it to another language, spell check a selection or document, grammar check a selection or document, look it up in a thesuarus, make a graph of data, run a script on it, speak text aloud, etc. You can download these services or they can be offered by applications or the OS.

      Freeware - There is a pile of real and useful freeware on OS X. No really, good, free software from linux as well as mac native applications are made and distributed for free. The free dev tools have prompted thousands of developers to write useful free applications that are in some cases better than anything (even commercial offerings) available on Windows.

      I use a number of OS's each day, but i gravitate to OS X as my default because I can get more done with less frustration. I'm not sure how serious you are, or if you would prefer OS X. Some people get very used to doing things one particular way and the time and effort required to get used to doing things differently is just too much for them. Good luck!

    15. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      The best advice is to go use it yourself. Find a public library or university computer lab you can use and sit down and use an mac for a couple of hours. I'm a windows user, but whenever I'm on campus I use macs (mainly because they are usually free! It amazes me to see people standing in line to use a windows machine to write a paper when the macs are half open). There are things I like about osx, there are things I don't like about it. If you don't have any issues with windows, then there probably really isn't any reason to switch. If I have money left at the end of the summer, I'll probalby get a mac mini, but it is ore just gadget lust than anything else (I'm having enough trouble messing around with Linux on an old computer, so I don't really know why I would need a mac!).

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    16. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Stanza · · Score: 2, Informative
      Initially, you'd be less productive (say one week, tops) and afterwards you'll probably be a lot more productive.

      I'd say you're stretching it just a tad too much. I took me about a month to get used to OS X, and that's coming from a unix background. And I'm still learning lots of little things that make people frustrated because they automagically think they already know what they are doing.


      Yes, productivity will go down, for a short while. It'll take about a week to get comfortable, a couple weeks to get where you already are, and then there will lots of little details that bug you because little things aren't the same.

    17. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by dr00g911 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of people will make this into a religious debate -- which I'm guilty of from time to time -- but it's really just a matter of personal taste.

      I have Macs and Win boxes in both my home and work offices. I've got a Debian box at home as well.

      There are very specific tasks that work better on the PC in my opinion. For me, those tasks are games and Maya. This is coming from an artist's perspective primarily, a coder's perspective second and gamer's third.

      Everything else, I use my Macs for because they just 'feel' right. It feels like I'm drawing with my left hand to use Photoshop under Windows with an identical interface and mostly identical key commands. Mouse acceleration curves feel funky, and I loathe -- nay -- LOATHE the fact that the majority of apps I use have to have a second desktop behind them (that gray background you get when 'maximized'). I like seeing my desktop. I like having a palette monitor that's got my email client in the non-palette space. I like the Mac's implementation of drag & drop. I like the lack of reliance on the second mouse button to do everyday tasks.

      Quark Xpress 6+ is flaky on any platform at any speed, however type is significantly more manageable and supported on the Mac.

      BBEdit is reason enough to buy a Mac, all by itself if you're a coder. It's rocked my world for years (network-wide find & replace from circa '95 -- maybe earlier) and just keeps getting better.

      Don't even get me started about Windows and CMYK support, professional level color management, search functionality ("find" was practically instant across all drives and servers BEFORE spotlight -- now we have instant filename, content and context-sensitive metadata). Coupled with 45 minutes on my 3ghz P4 to search just my frigging C: and D: drives.

      Once you get yourself immersed in the Mac, it fits like a tailored suit -- there's an astounding amount of tiny bits of polish and subtle features that have been cloned to the Win side by someone who didn't understand the meaning of elegance or subtlety (see the Longhorn 'Glass' demo that's surfacing for a prime example).

      Anyhow, at home I choose my relatively slow 17" flat panel iMac G4 over my screaming and fully loaded gaming and Maya PC for almost every task because I'm more productive and happier. YMMV.

    18. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      And as a addon-question, what about a small business/corporation? Are there any central management tools?

      --
      Sig it.
    19. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by circusboy · · Score: 1

      probably nothing,

      historical note for reference, my first machine was an apple IIe, and then a long break of using other people's computers, (at work, house, whatever) Unix (AIX), Macs and Amigas in College, PCs with various flavors of windows at various jobs, (won a PC at Siggraph one year,) but when I eventually decided to buy a machine, it was for my own creative work. (at the time video/photo/music, creative stuff...) I wanted to buy a machine that had good creative software available for it, and could easily connect to the various peripherals that those endeavors required. so I bought a Mac. (secondary reason was because I didn't want my job to think that they could tell me to take work home with me, but that is beside the point, and these days no longer valid.)

      The primary thing that keeps me on a macintosh, and the thing that makes me shudder when I sit at a machine running something else, is familiarity. I suspect that this would be true for anyone reading this website. you get used to things. I have noticed that there are a fair number of people here who for one reason or another use more than one OS, and all of them have their favorite, (a frequent remark is along the lines of "I use %s at work and %s to get any work done", anOS, anotherOS ) I figure most people have the same experience with their method of working, whatever the context. (talk to a carpenter about saws someday.)

      there are some simple little things that I like about the mac UI that are things that have not changed since the beginning, the title bar for instance, as opposed to the task bar. On an apple, the big bold bit of type in the top left tells me the application, there is an apple there, but "you are working in Photoshop." if I look at the task bar on a windows machine, to me it says "you are working in Windows"

      This is a small thing, but it is of subtleties like this that the experience of working on a mac becomes "doing things" rather than "working" and to me, that is all the difference in the world.

      But, if you are used to windows and are successful with it, the cost, (in terms of changing habits rather than money) may very well not be worth it. It was for me, but YMMV. having said all that, I tend to do much of my text editing these days in a terminal version of emacs, (not the carbon or X one.) so please take this with an appropriately sized grain of salt.

      Thank you for flying the friendly skies, do come again.

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    20. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by lunadog · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think it is really a question of taste, and what you want to do.

      I have a G5 Powerbook at work, and I am pretty disappointed with the performance. Partly the problem is the lack of RAM (256Mb) but it should be possible to run a laptop with this..

      So.. here are my experiences:

      1) I have to use M$ Office for my work, and the native OSX implementation of Office is a pile of **** (thanks M$!)..

      2) It is also far from simple to install OpenOffice.org,

      3) The X-Server solution (darwin) is a real pig (I would rather use Cygwin quite honestly, the amount of extra overheads it uses).

      4) The way Macs keep applications open after the window has been closed is also very irritating since it guzzles RAM like there is no tomorrow...

      5) This is to say nothing of the irritation of getting right click to work with a single mouse button...

      6) Oh.. Also wxWindows/wxPython is not up to Linux/Windows levels of stability yet, and the built in python implementation is really weird (there is a dodgy workaround to get graphical python apps to appear by using a different python binary).

      If you are into Medya stuff, and like flashy GUIs then sure, try the Mac, I am sure your productivity will improve. Otherwise, use Windoze or Linux..

      The hardware is cool, and the fact it is so standardised makes driver problems very infrequent. But I am really so close to ditching OSX and installing Debian or Ubuntu... My work laptop is nowhere near as sweet as my desktop at home running Debian sid, and it is all down to the resource drain thar is OSX IMHO.

    21. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      I don't know how they do it, but most things seem to not need a driver or use a preinstalled driver of some sort.

      Because by default they include 2GB of every driver they could possibly find installed already.

      If you click "advanced options" in the installer program, you can see and and deselect it (along with 1.5 GB of asian fonts) if you're starved for disk space.

    22. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by flatland_skier · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI...I am an Apple VAR so your millage may vary.

      I would say, that for the small business, Tiger is a super choice.

      Maybe not on the desktop but as an office server. The hype has been going to the Client version, but OS X server should really be a hit.

      Why? Support for native windows ACL's! You will no longer be limited to the Posix User, Group, Everyone permissions. Easy of setup. There is one interface to control all of the Apple supported Services( AFP, SMB, Web, Application Server, Mail ). XGrid...XSan.... the list goes on.

    23. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you why I switched from Win XP to the Mac for my every day machine about a year ago - I sat down to work on a spreadsheet for a proposal that had to go out in an hour. As I started to type, my screen was taken over by an advertisment for some DVD. Antispyware software, anti-virus software, and a firewall - and still that crap gets through (even without using IE) and distrupts my work. That was the last straw - I went out and bought a mac that week, and haven't been bothered by spyware, adware, or viruses since.

    24. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by zpok · · Score: 1

      I agree with you wholeheartedly based on your comments. A mousepad with one button is hell, for instance. Although I'm very sure there are lots of non-designers who could benefit from switching as well, you don't seem to be one of them.

      BUT do yourself a favor and install more ram. OS X needs it. It'll make a world of difference. It's no use griping about it. And it's not a lost investment even if you install Debian.

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    25. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by IcePop456 · · Score: 1

      I would love to switch to OS X, but I'm not changing hardware.

      If they released an Intel/x86 version of OS X I would immediately give it a try. Otherwise I'm sticking with WinXP SP2 because it works nicely. Linux is missing too many drivers and the "easy" factor. My computer is a tool not a project.

    26. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by zpok · · Score: 1

      It really really depends. I have no problem switching to windows for instance (not that I like it) and can set up work flows that work as good as windows allows me to.

      I do think I'm more into GUI's than you are, and I've read OS X is a very particular brand of UNIX. There are only so many ways to do things with GUI's, but with the guts and grits of UNIX I'm sure there's lots of adapting to do. I am however way out of my debt here...

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    27. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Initially, you'd be less productive (say one week, tops) and afterwards you'll probably be a lot more productive.

      To add to what the parent is saying:

      IMO this will start exactly when you purchase a two-button mouse for your Mac.

      And you can take that as funny, but as for giving advice to anyone who has been using Windows for the past 5 years and is planning on switching to a Mac, I'm serious. I tried to make myself use the one button mouse for a few weeks and then I went out and bought a nice MS scroll wheel laser light one and OS X stopped feeling akward and everything fell into place.

      Everything in OS X has support for right click so you might as well take advantage of it.

      And for work flow and stability... There are a few nags and oddities, but after a while you start saying to yourself "This makes a whole lot more sense this way instead of what I used to do!"

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    28. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are probably getting more advice than you can handle but here is the one thing that really helped me when I switched: Find a mac user in your area to ask questions. The first day I had my Mac I didn't know how to switch it off! I called my friend and sheepishly asked for advice. I think I called two more times that day. Now I take calls to help out other newbies. Pay it forward.

      As a mac lover I do have to say that if you are not having problems with your XP machine and you are productive, why switch? It will cost you time, money and some initial grief/confusion. If it ain't broke...

    29. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by sootman · · Score: 1

      I'm in a similar boat. I use mostly Adobe apps, and some Macromedia, and am equally at home & happy in w2k (hate XP) and OS X. There are things I like and dislike about both OSs but when I'm in one I use what works and ignore what doesn't.

      However, the UNIXness of OS X is a big plus for me. I have a native bash CLI in OS X *and* it's integrated with the OS. So not only does it beat the pants off Cygwin (no special shell to launch, no 'cygdrive' abstractions, etc.) but it goes above and beyond with features like drag and drop. I can type 'scp ', drag a file from the desktop to the window, and then finish with the remote server info. I can type 'open .' and a Finder window pops open of my PWD. And so on and so on.

      I used to strongly prefer Win9x to OS 8/9. I liked w2k more than early OS Xs. But OS X got better with each release, and Windows got worse. For example, when I open my wireless iBook, the menubar scrolls to tell me it has joined a network that I've previously told it is OK. No hassles. In XP, I get several annoying prompts--"wireless networks are available!" "hey, I just joined one!", or maybe "I won't join this network because it's insecure! even though you said it was OK before!"--that stay open annoyingly for quite a while. If I click 'close', it steals focus from my current app. And then another pops up. Or plug in a USB drive, or a USB keyboard. Windows takes two minutes to run through five permutations of the New Hardware wizard. OS X just waits a couple seconds, recognizes it, and you can use it, no fuss. The OSs are like that now: a bunch of little annoying things in Windows, and a bunch of nice little things in OS X.

      But then again, the professional apps I use, I use at work. I wouldn't switch if it meant I had to buy new copies of Studio MX and Creative Suite with my own money. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    30. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by klang · · Score: 1

      ..well, it also happened on my PowerBook Duo 230, running System 7.1 .. we are talking 1992, here... drag'n'drop is not a new feature on Macs.

      Just for fun, try doing the drag'n'drop thing with two different applications (not both from Microsoft) .. drag'n'drop works for all applications on a Mac ... hell, you can even select a few minutes of a QuickTime movie and drop it anywhere you want!

    31. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My computer is a tool not a project.

      That's an ironic statement coming from someone unwilling to ditch Windows. Many have said that the best part of Mac OS X is that it lets your computer be a tool. It just works, and it gets out of your way.

    32. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...what is a good reason to switch away from WinXP?..."
      How about free, high-quality development tools like XCode? Or having Java, Perl, and Python available by default on any OS X system you want to work or deploy on?

      Beyond that, follow some of the links in Apple's reasons to switch and see if anything appeals to you.

      I'll be the first to admit you can't always get Windows out of your life; I still make my living writing code for the platform. But I've found that learning to write Cocoa-based OS X applications that conform to Apple's design documents have improved the way I look at the GUIs I design for Windows apps. Learning alternate platforms always opens your eyes to new ways of solving problems.

      Don't switch; just add something new to what you already know.
    33. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 15inch powerbook and for me it's not the big things. It's not the speed (I can get a faster x86 for the same money I know) it's the little things.

      After I had the machine for a couple of weeks I turned expose on. That is probably the single best GUI inhancement I've seen. You have to use it for a while and it becomes second nature.

      The same goes for the dock. Love it or hate it, it's not meant to be a start bar. It's meant to do exactly what it does. I spend 90% of my time in programs I have open, not needing quick access to programs to open. On my mac I'm 3 clicks from my applications and 2 more plus a few mouse movements to pick the one I want. Windows with the start menu is much the same really. The doc shows applications that are open and files/windows that are minimized to it. Everything else is open, so it's not there taking up space. Combined with expose and the dock really does come into it's own.

      There are thousands of other little things, the integration of Mail, Addressbook, bluetooth, iCal etc is fantastic and it's just there. I've actually moved people who'd been using Outlook then switched to Entourage when they got a mac to Mail etc and they loved it. It did everything Oulook/Entourage did and more from thier point of view. It's all down to the fact that they didn't have to hunt for features, everything they actually wanted to do was there and they could easily find it.

      I like the networking, It works very well for our environment. We have a lot of laptop users with macs, they join the wireless network find the share they want and mount it. Then when they're done they unmount it. It's much harder to try and explain that the mapped drive wont be there outside the office and why. I've also installed NFS on a few machines and now when I join our network I get the mounts automatically.

      For me the switch was worth it for the comfort and increase in productivity. The it just works factor only increases both.

      For the record I'm also a lead programer, so it wouldn't be a streach to say I do know more than a little bit about computers. My windows machines rarely crash, and I know more than enough to avoid virus and malware infections.

    34. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      If you want to switch, switch. If you don't, don't.

      My Windows machine spontaneously rebooted itself one too many times. I turned it off and ordered a Powerbook (having had good luck with Macs in the past). Never goin' back.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    35. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but to be fair, that's not Microsoft's problem, that's the third-party software developers problem.

      All the Microsoft applications support drag&drop how it should be supported, even creating 'clippings' (Mac term; I don't know what they are called in Windows) on the desktop if you drag there. The problem is that almost *no* third party applications make use of drag&drop, even though all the APIs for it are exposed for them to use whenever they feel like.

      Part of the Mac culture is that *all* the software is of a more consistant quality. You can be assured that your $10 shareware application supports drag&drop as easily as your $400 office suite. I don't know if that's because MacOS attracts better programmers, or because Apple's development tools are so much easier to use, but that's pretty much the facts.

      Additionally, Mac users tend to pick applications based on which have better GUIs... you very rarely see this behavior on Windows, where people will use abominations like Trillian and proclaim it the best thing ever.

    36. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Proteus · · Score: 1
      but what is a good reason to switch away from WinXP?

      As a recent switcher, I can tell you what my motivations were: take 'em or leave 'em, I suppose.

      1. Security
        Yeah, WinXP can be made pretty secure. But, OSX has a better security model, a more-secure default install, and sensibly simple security controls. The BSD-base lets you tweak to a great degree, but the frontend lets you manage things well enough. A great example of this is the software installation process: if software needs to put files in sensitive areas, OSX will require you to enter your password -- even if you're already logged into and Administrator-like account. Also, in order to keep your WinXP box virus-free, you have to invest in AntiViral software (costs at least the performance hit); not so on OSX.
      2. Simplicity
        I don't mean my-grandma-can-use-it, though that's certainly true. I'm a developer. The simplicity is there at the top level, so you needn't learn great detail abou things you don't care about. The complexity is documented, but abstracted so it disappears until you want it. The elegance of the user experience is fantastic. Compare uninstalling apps under windows (Start, Control Panel, Add/Remove programs, Select, Click Uninstall, follow the wizard, hope the producer spent enough time on the uninstall script) with doing under Mac (drag to trash. At worst case, enter your password to remove unneeded libraries).
      3. Flexibility
        The Mac is PowerPC hardware running a BSD-based core. This means I get all the advantages of a Unix core (and CLI) and all the advantages of the best GUI around. I can work most efficiently by moving between those environments depending on the task at hand. Also, OSX gives you most of the advantages of running Unix, but with much superior hardware support (YMMV, I suppose). To cap it off, I can still run Linux, and for little more than the cost of XP Pro, I can get Virtual PC including a copy of XP Pro. Can your PC run Linux, OSX and Windows? Great for testing.

        And then, there's the icing: with Mac-on-Linux, I can run OSX under Linux, Windows under Linux (VMWare), or even Windows under OSX (VPC) under Linux (MOL).

      4. Cost
        Upgrading WinXP is around $200 per machine. Upgrading OSX is $129 for one box, but $199 for a 5-pack. Do the math. Add to that, the "in-the-box" software with OSX is more valuable than what comes with Windows. Caveat emptor: the first Mac you buy can be a little costly, since you'll have to re-buy some software you might use, like MS-Office. However, the cost for Mac software isn't generally more than PC software, and using fink and DarwinPorts, many free and open-source Unix apps are available as well.

      I'm not one who thinks XP is crap. I use it at work, and though my OS of choice has been Linux, XP has been quite serviceable. The more I use OSX, though, the more I realize that Windows seems to have borrowed a lot from Apple's OSen -- and often borrowed it poorly.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    37. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 1

      #1 Problem, you don't have enough RAM!
      #2 Problem, you don't have enough RAM!
      #3 Problem, Dude, you dont' have enough RAM!

      I've got two PowerBooks and a PowerMac, all three have at least a Gig of RAM and they all run rather fast and reliably.

      Office X 2004 runs great! It's better then the latest Windows Office 2003. If it's crashing on you it may be the lack of RAM or some corrupted Office X files.

      Always run the latest *PATCHED* version of any software, especially Office X. The reason for the patches is to fix bugs and improve stability!

      If you are running Panther, you should have Journaling turned on and periodically running the Repair Permissions and Repair Disk within the Disk Utility.

      Also, DON'T BUY CHEAP RAM!!! Apple hardware is notoriously picky about the RAM it uses. Buy something cheap and slightly out of spec and you will have intermittent problems crashing and kernel dumps.

      I would recommend a quality RAM supplier like Crucial Memory - http://crucial.com/ http://crucial.com/mac/index.asp -- Hey, they even have an Apple page just for us!

      I've been buying RAM from Crucial for years and years, never ever had a problem with their RAM.

    38. Re: Is there really a reason to switch? by gidds · · Score: 1
      I have the reverse perspective -- I've had my Mac for several years (never owned a PC), and it's still running Mac OS X 10.2, which is still fine for me. OTOH, it's been a while since I used a PC much, so when I recently started a new job and I had to use a PC (XP), I noticed lots of things which really annoy me.

      Obviously, being a work PC, there's a lot of home-use type stuff which I haven't used. But even with just Notes, JBuilder, ClearCase, and a couple of other apps, there are still tons of little things which I miss.

      A few examples: in the OS X, there's a single keystroke to close the current window/pane/tab (Cmd+W) -- in XP, it varies; sometimes, there's no shortcut at all. (Ditto Find again, and umpteen other common functions.) In OS X, if you have some highlighted text, pressing right arrow will leave the cursor at the end of it; on XP, sometimes it leaves it one character from the left of the selection. In OS X, pressing the down arrow on a single-line text field takes you to the very end; in XP, sometimes a Ctrl+combination will do the job, and other times you can't. In OS X, almost all multi-line text fields will use the system spellchecker, underlining unrecognised words &c if set to do so. (For example, it's doing so right now as I type this in Safari.) Whereas in XP, some apps have their own spellcheckers, each with its own dictionaries, keystrokes, options, &c; others have none at all. Even with ClearType turned on, I find XP text gritty and harder to read than the nice smooth elegant Mac fonts -- where everything, including menus, captions, labels, &c are all smoothed, as are icons, buttons, and everything else.

      Now, taken singly, each of these points probably sounds petty and unimportant. But there are hundreds of these annoyances. And what they add up to is clumsiness, awkwardness, the feeling that it's getting in the way all the time. I hate to reuse a catchphrase, but it's true: Mac OS X just works -- it does what you expect, it's consistent, it gets out of your way and lets you get on with things.

      Of course, it has many pretty major features, too. But don't underestimate the little things.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    39. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      It sucks that when ever anyone notes problems they had with OS X or Apple they get modded as troll.
      As others here have said - do yourself a favor and get more RAM. It will make a huge difference.
      We have a Powerbook G4 here at the office with 256MB of RAM and I was amazed at how bad it performs. Mostly because I am used to using machines with 512MB or 1GB of RAM.
      This applies for XP as well, you really do lose performance running XP in 256MB of RAM. Both operating systems hit their sweet spot at 1GB in my opinion (I should note I'm a heavy multitasker and run a lot of apps concurrently).

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    40. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Most the Linux desktops I've seen are covered with - (1) a web browser, (2) xmms, (3) a huge console.

      And most OSX desktops I've seen are Full Screen Photoshop. That doesn't mean a thing.

    41. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      and then there will lots of little details that bug you because little things aren't the same.

      Oh man.. is that the truth. The thing that drives me nuts is OSX's bizarre keyboard shortcuts. In every other OS, I can click on a file, and hit Delete.. and it'll move it to the trash. Under OSX I have to hit Apple-Delete. Why? It's not like the Delete key does anything.. why add the extra modifier there?

      Home and End keys in OSX always do the *last* thing you'd want to ever do... they're so useless that noone uses them.

      The other thing that bugs me is how many F-keys Apple steals on its powerbooks. There's an F-key (F7) to switch between "clone video" and "multimonitor"! Why?! Are there people out there that toggle between these modes so often they need to reserve a key for it?

      In fact, on the newest powerbooks F1 through F10 are stolen. So even Expose isn't a single keypress (except for ShowDesktop) anymore.

      Gone are the days when MacOS was actually well thought-out. Now it's just pretty (even that isn't completely true anymore.. Aqua looks so dated and ugly to me now.. as passe as the first iMacs) usability and consistency has really gone right out the window.

    42. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's funny- I have this 'same' feeling on Windows: "I know this isn't gonna work.."

    43. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      In the Mac world, there's this wierd feeling you get that "this probably works" and you try it. Usually it works. It is difficult to explain, but the global drag and drop feature is so thightly integrated that one tend to use it.

      I think I can explain this really well. Do you know people that compulsively select text in the web page with their mouse while they read it? I'm one of those people... :-) Anyway, I discovered by accident one day that if you select text in a webpage, then click and drag it onto the desktop, OS X actually makes a text document for you, out of the bit of text you dragged off the web-page... Global drag and drop is pervasive... You just have to really delve into it and push the limits and usually what you're trying to do will work. It's kinda creepy.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    44. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Squozen · · Score: 1

      If you're happy with WinXP, either don't switch, or get a Mac mini and a KVM switch to experiment with OS X. Reasons for doing so? Well, you haven't stated what you DO with your PC, but Macs are great for development, graphics, audio, net tasks, pretty much everything except extreme high-end gaming.. which the PC can do.

      I only use my PC for a couple of non-Mac-compatible games now, the Mac does the rest.

    45. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by Squozen · · Score: 1

      From Microsoft's site:

      System Requirements for Office 2004 Professional Edition

      System Requirements
      Hardware: 700 MHz native* PowerPC G3, G4 or G5 processor
      Operating System: Mac OS X version 10.2.8-10.3; Mac OS X version 10.3 is required for the Power Mac G5
      Memory: 512 MB of RAM

    46. Re:Is there really a reason to switch? by shrik3 · · Score: 1
      Partly the problem is the lack of RAM (256Mb) but it should be possible to run a laptop with this..
      You wouldn't run Gnome or KDE with 256MB of memory, would you? So why on earth do you expect OSX to work smoothly with 256MB?
      4) The way Macs keep applications open after the window has been closed is also very irritating since it guzzles RAM like there is no tomorrow...
      Actually the OSX swapping algorithm is pretty smart, you wouldn't even notice the small amount of RAM if the laptop HD wasn't so slow. Compare this to the seconds of tedious disk crunching on Windows (Even with a gig of ram it still decides to swap things out of RAM, can't fathom why)
      5) This is to say nothing of the irritation of getting right click to work with a single mouse button...
      You don't need to right click in OSX, that's why the default mouses all have oly one button. And if you really really need that context menu, holding down the mouse button for a second works just fine.
  24. slow mail? by _|()|\| · · Score: 1

    I switched from Eudora 5.2 for Windows to Mail.app in 10.3 (thanks, Eudora Mailbox Cleaner), and I'm generally pleased. However, I'm on a lot of mailing lists at work, and it already takes a few seconds to open some of my mailboxes on a 1.8GHz iMac G5. I was hoping for some improvement in 10.4.

    1. Re:slow mail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, on my 800Mhz iBook, tiger's mail feels noticeably faster than it did on panther.

    2. Re:slow mail? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Mail is much much faster in Tiger... It uses Spotlight searches to display emails now instead of it's own database system.

    3. Re:slow mail? by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      If you think 10.3 is slow its a good thing you didn't switch in 10.2. Apple Mail has serious performance issues and, without a redesign, I"m not sure how much can be done.

      1. IMAP public folders -- where I work is a Microsoft environment. We ditched sendmail years ago in favor of Exchange (never mind the three month email outage which followed). I access my email via IMAP and the biggest performance issue here is it traversing the entire available directory structure. A large organization with ridiculous amounts of public folders.

      This pretty much killed Apple Mail in 10.2 -- it would not respond while getting a read count for the bazillion folders I never even look at. In 10.3 they managed to background this check: it still happens but is pre-empted by actually trying to use Apple Mail.

      2. IMAP -- folder size. What will still kill Apple Mail in 10.3 is the size of the folders. I get a ridiculous amount of email (technically not spam) and have server-side filtering to get it in the right folder. The problem is responsiveness, Apple Mail (even in 10.3) becomes completely unresponsive -- perhaps total hangs? who wants to wait half an hour to find out? -- and has to be force quit.

      I'm not sure of the folder sizes, but the whole thing is usually under 50MB. My solution? I move mail to local folders. This is a (minor) problem in that they are then obviously only available from my desktop system and I found that my initial plan of keeping it separated into years was not aggressive enough, and then discovered that moving mail older than 30 days at the beginning of each month wasn't aggressive enough. Currently I'm at no older than two weeks, more or less.

      I know the problem for number 1 and they addressed that in 10.3. I'm not sure what the issue with number 2 is (yes, IMAP isn't the best way to go, but there are people like me who have the option of using Apple Mail or using my WinXP box). My fear is that it is fundamental limitations in IMAP and insurmountable.

      MAPI (exchange client) isn't feasible for anyone other than MS and MS is keeping it that way. Interestingly enough, one way MS is fighting OS X is by not providing an exchange client. The last exchange client for the mac was Outlook 2001 which is OS 9, corrupts its install fairly routinely and -- is OS 9. Ack!

      Both Entourage and Apple Mail advertise Exchange support -- both do it through IMAP kludges. And Entourage is so buggy as to be worthless in an exchange environment which leaves Apple Mail or Windows.

      thoromyr

    4. Re:slow mail? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      As that guy who "reads your email" for a living, the problem isn't your email client. You are either accessing your mail over a slow link, on a slow server, or you REALLY need to cut down on the crap in your mailboxes.

      -Sean

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:slow mail? by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      I've been using Entourage for POP, since switching. I haven't run into any issues. I've got the latest updates for 2004 installed btw. What kind of bugs does Entourage have, or is this only when you are trying to get mail from Exchange?

  25. no reg NYT link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    A link to the NYT article that doesn't need registration.

    When pointing to the NYT, can you please use the New York Times Link Generator! Links are the whole point of the web! While cutting-and-pasting the text is possible it's a bit of a kludge IMHO.

  26. Why can't they test unix for what it is? by cybrthng · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Does it run Oracle? Can i run JDeveloper? How stable is JDK 1.5 and Eclipse? Does JDK 1.5 even work?

    How much memory can my 64bit system use on a 32bit os?

    How stable is the new GCC 4.0?

    It seems to me only have one major vendor for most of its hardware lines that is why OSX is able to be stable and clean.. if they STILL have performance problems why do they continue to push outdated hardware and expensive prices?

    1. Re:Why can't they test unix for what it is? by Chucker23N · · Score: 4, Informative

      It runs Oracle.

      Java 1.5 isn't available yet, but will be soon.

      64-bit memory addressing is available for 64-bit backend processes. As the PowerPC can handle 32-bit and 64-bit at the same time, there's no performance cut at all.

      I wasn't able to test the final GCC 4.0 yet.

      I don't know what you mean by performance problems, outdated hardware and expensive prices.

  27. Slowness by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Walt Mossberg of the WSJ says 'Tiger Leaps Out in Front' but complains about slowness of some applications - notably Mail.

    In all fairness, I've not used OSX before but back when the Classic and IIc reigned supreme the common complaint about the Mac was that it was too underpowered for the Operating System and the applications. Hell, my 7mhz Amiga felt zippier and responded quicker than the IIc.

    Even in the Windows world, iTunes runs rather slow, has limited features (including the annoying "feature" of getting itself and my iPod completely out of sync with "consolidate" being the only, drastic, tool to resolve this) and takes up an inane amount of memory. Hardly a good impression of what to expect from Apple.

    Sadly, these two things (including the fact that I'll be effectivily throwing away all the money I've currently invested in my PC) sour my desire to immediately switch to Apple.

    However, when we all shift to BTX and I've got no choice but to replace every part of my computer then I have no doubt that I'll make the jump.

    This won't be for a couple of years and i think there might be others who will wait until they find that the only way to move forward is replace so much of their PC that switching to Apple entirely isn't so much of a big deal.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Slowness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even in the Windows world, iTunes runs rather slow, has limited features (including the annoying "feature" of getting itself and my iPod completely out of sync with "consolidate" being the only, drastic, tool to resolve this) and takes up an inane amount of memory.

      Well, you're not a fanboy, so you're not looking for the right things. First off, how does it look? You know, an Apple fanboy can tell how insanely great any app is within seconds, just by checking out its graphics. They are much more artistic than us regular folk -- they think different.

    2. Re:Slowness by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      Make the jump. I use Windows and Mac OS X every single day, so I have a good sense of comparison.

      The Mac is like sitting a pleasant garden. There's a bug here and there, and maybe the landscaping could be tweaked, but it smells nice and is a relaxing place to work.

      Windows is a noisy junkyard. There's many layers of trash, and the owners keep piling on new layers of crap on top of the rickety lower levels. You can get work done, but you hate every second of it.

    3. Re:Slowness by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

      I like your analogy, I might have to steal it because I feel exactly the same way. Even booting it up irritates me--so much so that I've purchased mac versions of my games if available, and stopped playing the rest. That's something, because I believe it is the lack of games on mac and linux that prevent the vast majority of windows users from switching to a more useful and/or lower cost alternative. (I know about Cegeda, I bought wineX 3.0)

    4. Re:Slowness by pknoll · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...in the Windows world, iTunes runs rather slow, has limited features ... and takes up an inane amount of memory

      For what it's worth, I don't find that to be true of iTunes on OS X. Not knowing what you mean by "limited features", I can't address that, but having used iTunes on both Windows and OS X, I can say that OS X is the better environment to run it in. Which shouldn't be surprising to anyone.

    5. Re:Slowness by acidblue · · Score: 1
      Yes, the Windows version of iTunes is rather sloooow. But, the Mac version is incredibly fast. It takes less than 1 second to load on my Dual 1.8. So, it's really not an issue.

      Now Windows Media Player is a piece of junk on the Mac, go figure. Yet, obviously it snappy on XP.

      So, you can't compare it that way.

    6. Re:Slowness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you were trying to run the Mac OS on an Apple IIc, no wonder it was slow!

    7. Re:Slowness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even in the Windows world, iTunes runs rather slow, has limited features .... and takes up an inane amount of memory. Hardly a good impression of what to expect from Apple.

      You will be happy to know that Apple has successfully duplicated this Apple Experience(TM) for OSX, so that you do have a good impression of what to expect from Apple!

    8. Re:Slowness by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      Try booting in a corporate environment that runs a massive startup script, and has "no unauthorized users" and "fill in your timecard daily" dialogs popup that have to be manually dismissed so you can't turn on the PC and wander down to the cafeteria while it limps toward what passes for usability.

      Feel free to use the analogy. I get so tired of the automotive ones.

  28. port to x86? by NotThatKindOfDoctor · · Score: 0

    Would it be difficult to port Tiger to the amd64 platform, i686, or other architectures? It is based on FreeBSD, correct? It is clear that Apple is able to beat MS on the desktop. I just don't know why they won't compete head on. I would consider buying tiger for my group if I didn't have to buy all new hardware with it.

    1. Re:port to x86? by rafleming · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're an idiot.

    2. Re:port to x86? by paiute · · Score: 1

      Jesus Beer-Guzzling Christ, how many times does this question have to be asked and answered? Please, Slashdot, consider deleting the account of anyone who brings up this grizzled chestnut.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    3. Re:port to x86? by NotThatKindOfDoctor · · Score: 0

      I guess I'm not the only idiot still talking about this: http://osnews.com/story.php?news_id=10419 I just don't understand why if so many people, i.e. potential Mac customers (read above posts) complain about expensive hardware that Apple doesn't do something to reach that market. The Mac Mini has severe limitations in upgrading possibilities and the performance doesn't compare to what you can get for the same price using a different processor.

    4. Re:port to x86? by Chucker23N · · Score: 2, Informative

      The FreeBSD personality makes up a small component of the entire OS; the kernel is Mach-based (although not quite a Microkernel), and most of the rest has nothing to do with FreeBSD (or any other OS, for that matter) whatsoever.

      A bit of a write-up on the Mac OS X architecture: http://www.kernelthread.com/mac/osx/

    5. Re:port to x86? by paiute · · Score: 1

      From the linked article:

      But when a new PC is bought, and the buyer could choose the OS, and if he chooses MacOS X something different will happen:

      1. Apple's market share grows up (percentage)
      2. Microsoft's market share decreases (percentage)
      3. Apple gets money for the license (Microsoft gets nothing)

      If this scenario occurred the market would truly be shaken, and for 18 months whoever bought a new computer could choose between a brand new MacOS X Tiger, or a 64 bit version of plain old Windows XP (originally released in 2001).

      And you, what would you choose?


      I have never bought a PC. Can I go down to Comp USA and get one of those new PCs where I get to choose the operating system? You know, the ones for which Microsoft "gets nothing"?

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    6. Re:port to x86? by typhoonius · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the FreeBSD part is a "kernel within a kernel" (kind of like the executive in Windows NT). And of course, there actually is an x86 port of the whole mess. It doesn't come with the GUI jazz, but if you slap on GNUStep, you've basically got a NeXT box, which ain't a bad start.

      As for Apple entering the x86 arena full-force, don't look forward to it. I don't think Apple is eager to compete in the same razor-thin margin market that even IBM couldn't turn a profit on. Competing with Dell is dumb. Competing with Microsoft is dumb too; I'd rather see Apple relegated to perpetual niche status than perpetual death status like Be was or NeXT nearly was.

      And the hardware's pretty nice in its own right too.

    7. Re:port to x86? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Would it be difficult to port Tiger to the amd64 platform, i686, or other architectures?

      No.

      NeXT question?

    8. Re:port to x86? by ICECommander · · Score: 1

      You mean to say your an idiot.

      --
      All your Sybase are belong to us.
    9. Re:port to x86? by bani · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What has hardware manufacturing got to do with entering the x86 arena? Even microsoft doesn't make PCs. They make operating systems.

      Apple could sell OSX for x86, and benefit from the cutthroat pricing of x86 hardware, and the incredible choice of peripherals -- instead of the elitist pricing of mac hardware and the incredible lack of peripherals.

      Apple is already competing with microsoft. Selling OSX for x86 would change nothing (except let OSX leverage hardware it doesnt currently have access to).

  29. Oracle 10g on Mac OS X by TheOldBear · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Caution: Do not stare into laser with remaining eye.
  30. Gilbert and Sullivan! by adavies42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the NYT article:

    The Safari browser now subscribes to R.S.S. news feeds,
    And its "private browsing" mode conceals the tracks of online deeds.
    There are archives now, and log files, when you send or get a fax;
    You can make the pointer bigger on those Jumbotron-screened Macs.
    You can start a full-screen slide show from some photos on demand;
    And the voice that reads the screen aloud can lend the blind a hand.
    There's a password-phrase suggestor meant to make yours more secure,
    And the Grapher module draws equations simple and obscure.
    Then the Automator program is a geeky software clerk -
    You just choose the steps you want performed, and it does all the work.
    There's a lot of miscellany, lots of spit-and-polish stuff,
    But it works and doesn't slow you down - and these days, that's enough.

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
    1. Re:Gilbert and Sullivan! by roror · · Score: 1

      Hats off my friend. If I had mod points and if I could, I'd mod you +5 insightful.

    2. Re:Gilbert and Sullivan! by Palshife · · Score: 1

      GODLIKE.

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    3. Re:Gilbert and Sullivan! by carou · · Score: 1

      Then the Automator program is a geeky software clerk -
      You just choose the steps you want performed, and it does all the work.


      G&S would never have written that, it only rhymes in American...

      But good work otherwise!

    4. Re:Gilbert and Sullivan! by brettper · · Score: 1

      It's called assonance

      And no, it's doesn't mean sounding like an ass

    5. Re:Gilbert and Sullivan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, there's nothing better than attempting to read through some thrown-together tech-inspired doggerel early in the morning. This almost makes me wish I wasn't an English major.

  31. Folders by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    Why burrow around in folders when you can open any file or program with a couple of keystrokes?

    Quite frankly, whilst I like the idea of this, I also like the idea of nicely categorised folders and sub-folders containing all the relevant information on a particular subject.

    Searching is only useful if you know what you are looking for. If you want to see the associated documents for a project it's far easier to delve into the project name and then check out the various folders for the plans, test scripts, risks and issues logs and other information.

    So yes, search is great, but it isn't going to mean that people can abandon structured storage overnight. Or any time soon.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Folders by ka-klick · · Score: 1

      Then smart folders are for you!
      Just like in iTunes and iPhoto you can now create smart folders that "contain" the files that meet a criteria you've specified (including internal contents) no matter where they are actually stored on the disk. If you haven't used mart folders (on iTunes they call them Smart Playlists) they are really powerful and usually do a better job of organizing than creating playlists by hand.

      --

      MSRP - Tax, Title & Licence Extra Your Milage May Vary

    2. Re:Folders by OfficerNoGun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you're missing the point. Instead of putting all of the files for project A in a folder called project A, you could tag the file with the term Project A (assuming that the term isnt already contained in the document). But say that the documents is for project A, and is some sort of invoice. With the traditional folder structure you would have to put it either in a Project A folder or an invoice folder. Folders limit you to one indentifier at a time (or at least a heirarchy of indentifiers) With spotlight you could instanly call up all invoices, all project A documents, all project A invoices, etc.

    3. Re:Folders by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I will dissolve my structured storage wholeheartedly. Smart folders will be my directory structure. Fear will keep the local files in line.

      It will be a lot easier to just add the project information into the metadata than rely on a fixed directory structure. For example, if I want to view files related to projects A, B, and C then I can just search for all three. If I want them conviently grouped, I'll create a smart folder. When I don't care if they are grouped anymore, smart folder is gone.

      Sure it's going to take some adjustment and I'm not going to lump everything together. Although...there's no reason why different filetypes need to be separated. Hmm, I think the degree of my file lumping will be determined by smart folder details.

      If I could say, group all jpg files that have resolutions of (1024x768, 1280x1024, etc) that would be fantastic. If I can store metadata (like theme, mood, etc) in jpg files without using iPhoto (I don't like to mix my photographs with my desktop wallpaper) then it would be even better.

    4. Re:Folders by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      Then smart folders are for you!

      Problem is I'm still not convinced. I've got a project folder here with 12 sub-folders, 30 sub-sub folders and over 500 different files with different filename and types.

      Making a formula that correctly "contains" all those files sounds like a bit of a nightmare to set up and maintain.

      Having said that, Smart Playlists on iTunes is neat but woefully underpowered and inflexible. For example I can't get a smart playlist that is "(trance OR ambient OR chillout) AND rating>=4".

      Hopefully smart folders are a bit more powerful :)

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    5. Re:Folders by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 1
      Having said that, Smart Playlists on iTunes is neat but woefully underpowered and inflexible. For example I can't get a smart playlist that is "(trance OR ambient OR chillout) AND rating>=4".

      Combine Smart Playlists to achieve this. First create "playlist 1" that matches ANY (Genre is trance OR ambient OR chillout). Then create a second that matches ALL (is in "playlist 1" AND rating >=4).

      Requires extra playlists to build up the terms of your CNF formula, but it works.

      The GUI for creating Smart Folders / Saved Searches, unfortunately, does not have the combining power (there's no "is in smart folder X" option), so you can only have disjunction or conjunctions. This is very annoying. Fortunately, you can edit the .plist of the saved search to create any query you want, including nested ORs and ANDs. I think Apple just couldn't think of a good clean GUI for nesting conjunctions & disjunctions, which admittedly is a tough problem.

      --
      four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
    6. Re:Folders by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      Brilliant. Thanks for the tip. Will give it a go.

      Given that its possible to modify the logic at a lower level (so to speak) in Smart Folders, I wonder if there might be the same way to do this with Smart Playlists. You never know.

      Something for me to go play with :)

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    7. Re:Folders by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 3, Informative

      It will be a lot easier to just add the project information into the metadata than rely on a fixed directory structure.

      Um. I really don't want you to buy Tiger and then be disappointed.

      Spotlight isn't a general-purpose annotation system. In order for you to apply metadata to files, you have to have three things. First, a file format that supports metadata. (Metadata is actually stored inside files.) Two, an application that supports adding metadata. And finally, you have to have a Spotlight importer that extracts the metadata.

      Example: Adobe has not yet shipped (for some bafflingly reason) their importers for their file formats. These importers will be able to read XMP metadata and store it in Spotlight. But right now, they're not available. So if you want to add Spotlight-savvy metadata to an InDesign file, you are completely out of luck. It can't be done, no way, no how.

      Spotlight is great. I love Spotlight. Spotlight has changed the way I work. But if you go into it hoping that Spotlight is gonna do a whole bunch of things that it's just not equipped to do right now, you're going to be pissed. And I don't want you to be pissed.

      Now, that said, you can group all JPEG files together based on width and height criteria. That works fine. And you can use Spotlight comments to store free-form, unstructured metadata. But don't hope that Spotlight is a general-purpose file annotation system. It's not. At least not in this release.

    8. Re:Folders by trans_err · · Score: 1

      Spotlight allows for even more refined searches than jpg of certain resolution-- you can dig into color profiles, dpi, etc.. Its a really incredible system, and its open nature will allow developers to add more and more serch options.

    9. Re:Folders by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I wasn't expecting Spotlight to create any metadata, just to read the metadata I already have. Although comments will be handy, I didn't know about that.

      I know that it looks into word docs, but does it look at word doc metadata (file, properties). Right now my word docs have category, keywords, and comments in metadata that aren't really taken advantage of. As a librarian I am all about metadata usage. I have used partial solutions for sorting and categorizing using my file's metadata for years, spotlight looks like it will combine all of my efforts into one slick package.

      Sweet.

    10. Re:Folders by SandSpider · · Score: 1

      Spotlight isn't a general-purpose annotation system. In order for you to apply metadata to files, you have to have three things. First, a file format that supports metadata. (Metadata is actually stored inside files.) Two, an application that supports adding metadata. And finally, you have to have a Spotlight importer that extracts the metadata.

      I don't think that's entirely true. Take a look at the Ars Technica review of Tiger, the page linked is actually about the arbitrarily extensible metadata information.

      The example given is making a text file, then applying random attributes like 'color' or 'name' to it, with data associated to those attributes. It's pretty slick.

      And it's possible that you're thinking of something more specific than this, but I believe this will fulfill the parent post's requirements for a general-purpose automatic filing system based on metadata information.

      =Brian

      --
      There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    11. Re:Folders by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      I know that it looks into word docs, but does it look at word doc metadata (file, properties).

      Yes, it does. You'll be pleased.

    12. Re:Folders by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      Yes, we did add extended attributes to Darwin in version 8. But our Spotlight importers do not look for them.

      In theory, you could write your own importer that would extract key-value pairs from extended attributes and add them to the metadata store, but there are some significant technical problems with that. It's got to do with the way we define the Spotlight schema --importers define their own attributes; importers can't create new attributes at run-time.

    13. Re:Folders by SandSpider · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I see. Well, that's a bit of a shame. I suppose it's a good opportunity for a third-party developer. In the meantime, I I'll have to peruse the importer documentation and see what it'll take to get at least a scheme of my own up and running. Not quite as dynamic as I had hoped, but nothing that can't at least be improved by a bit of planning.

      =Brian

      --
      There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    14. Re:Folders by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      Seriously: Keep your expectations low. The 10.4 release of Spotlight is designed to be a search tool, not a database. User-design schemas are not supported. Schemas are tied to importers, which in turn are tied to file types in a one-to-many relationship. (One importer can handle more than one file type, but mdimport only calls one importer for each file.)

    15. Re:Folders by SandSpider · · Score: 1

      Okay, expectations sufficiently lowered. I think I get an idea of why Adobe hasn't rushed to announce their XMP importer, though. Since the idea behind XMP is to allow users to custom-define their metadata, the best that Adobe could do is to release an importer for a default set of metadata information, rather than the whole XMP shebang. Of course, you would know more than I on the subject, but I can see adobe focusing more on their CS 2 Browser rather than spending development time on a limited-purpose Tiger addition.

      Very disappointing, but hopefully I'll hardly notice when I start using Tiger seriously.

      =Brian

      --
      There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
  32. Here ya go by pastpolls · · Score: 1

    Yes, Yes, it's pretty stable... have had no problems 4-8GB depending on the systen 4.0 has given me no problems. I don't see and performance problems, but it is all in the system you configure.

  33. Re:So what's really new?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word: Spotlight.

  34. spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 0

    I'm tired of reviews which spent all the time saying how great spothlight and dashboard is. And sure, they are great, but I'm sure there ARE more things in Tiger. Spothlight isn't exactly a killer app for people like which spend 100% of the time in a command shell (yes, I know there's a spotligh command-line equivalent) and running vim. If spotlight and dashboard is everything Tigert has, it's way more deceiving than Longhorn.

    And dashboard is everything but a killer app - I already tried gdesklets and I just do NOT need to have a widget telling me the weather, I've windows in my house, thanks. Neither I need a stock tracker, or a currency converter, and much less a calculator or a calendar or a fligh tracker or a world clock (Why on earth would 99.9% of the global population want to know what time is in other part of the world?)

    So why not Apple die-hard-fans stop talking about all that bullshit and start talking about launchd, and all those REAL features which are really interesting?

    1. Re:spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you're spending 100% of your time in a command shell running, why do you even need a real computer? just get yourself a nice dumb terminal and be done with it.

    2. Re:spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by cbv · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would 99.9% of the global population want to know what time is in other part of the world?

      Some may be too lazy to "calculate" the time difference. And others simply do not know how.

      I for one do have business partners all over the world and not only am I too lazy to do the math and but also too cheap to buy a couple of clocks, one for each time zone.

    3. Re:spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by zpok · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I just do NOT need to have a widget telling me the weather, I've windows in my house, thanks. Neither I need a stock tracker, or a currency converter, and much less a calculator or a calendar or a fligh tracker or a world clock (Why on earth would 99.9% of the global population want to know what time is in other part of the world?) "

      Um, some of us have lives that take us beyond those grimy windows? I LOVE the flight tracker, world clock and currency converter. To me these will be the three top most useful utilities. Having them in one environment instead of two browser windows and the calculator is not a trivial thing, however stupid that sounds.

      Apart from that, I agree, there's a lot more to be enthusiastic about.

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    4. Re:spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      I work in media. Some of us are talking about switching to Mac because of smart system apps like Dashboard. All of us need a world clock from time to time, even more often do we need currency / unit calc but most of all: Dashboard can give us the ultimate monitoring system for news media. We have a web based system for tracking news and it would only take a day or so to integrate this with Dashboard.

      This comes in addition to all the other spiffy MacOS stuff.

    5. Re:spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your logical error is in assuming that you're indicative of Mac users (or even users of any platform).

      Obviously you're not, as you spend 100% of your time in the shell.

      I'll go out on a limb and say that the other 99.9% of us use the GUI. For me, Spotlight is going to be interesting, Automator will be potentially great, gcc4.0 will be amazing and the Core data services will change my world.

      And I'm not representative either. I develop games as a hobby, so gcc4.0 makes my list of new toys but would make few other people's lists I suspect.

      But end users will soon feel the effect of the Core data services, in image-processing apps, in rapid development of new apps (they should spring up around all over the place) and in a consistent expectation of the interface and how it works.

      I don't see Dashboard as being of great value to me. But then I don't use Expose either. But I know a lot of people who do, and they'll probably get great value out of Dashboard. It's not just weather and time, after all, but any service people want.

      Calm down a bit, realise that the majority of users don't work like you do, and respect their excitement in getting new toys to play with.

    6. Re:spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay I'll answer your questions point by point:

      and I just do NOT need to have a widget telling me the weather

      While it's easy enough to argue for something that gives the current temperature, the widget also happens to give you a forecast, which is useful if you want to be prepared for some time other than say, right now. So, unless you have Windows in your house that can also show you the future....

      Neither I need a stock tracker

      I realize that you don't own any stock, and admittedly, neither do I. It would be pretty stupid for Apple to leave out a feature because of the fact that the two of us don't have much use for it.

      or a currency converter

      I'm going to Mexico for my Honeymoon next month, and I'll be glad of the ability to use this feature. (And, just to to be thorough, it will also be useful to know the weather conditions around the Riviera Maya for the first week of June.)

      much less a calculator or a calendar

      I wasn't aware that we were dealing with a Math Genius here. The rest of us happen to find lots of uses for a calculator, not to mention have appointments that a calendar might be useful for. Again, just because Stephen Hawking here doesn't need it, doesn't mean the rest of us won't find it useful.

      or a fligh tracker

      Have you ever waited an extra hour or four for a plane that was late? If you have, you'll be excited about this feature.

      or a world clock (Why on earth would 99.9% of the global population want to know what time is in other part of the world?)

      Um... because we're a global community in this day and age? My best friend from high school lives in Germany, because her husband is stationed there. I can barely keep track of whether or not my parents in Indiana are currently an hour behind us or matched up, let alone what the time difference between here and Germany happens to be.

      In short, it's really nice to have all of this at my fingertips.

    7. Re:spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a Mac 10.3 user, and I do not see a single reason to pay the $129 yearly tax to Jobs.

      There isn't a single reason to upgrade.

      Spotlight - who cares? I have kept my files organized for 10+ years. I know where my data is.

      Dashboard - I want a clean desktop. I didn't want stock tickers beeping at me during the dot-com bubble, and I don't want it now. If I want a stock quote, the weather, &c., I'll fire up a web browser.

      iChat video conferencing - it's useless in the real world. There is no way that you would get 4 colleagues or friends together who not only all have Macintoshes, but who all have G5s and 10.4!

      This release is a service pack at best. Can you imagine the outrage if Microsoft charged $130 each year for an operating system upgrade?

    8. Re:spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. I agree if you spend all your time in the command line, spotlight doesn't do a damn thing for you, but if you are someone like me, who manages photos, MS Office documents, tons of email, etc (ie a long time average user with a big back catalog) Spotlight is a godsend. I've been using it for exactly 3 days (hooray for the idiots at MacMall who shipped early!) and it's already changing the way I think about my data... much like itunes changed the way I think about my music library. I don't remember the titles of all the thousands of emails and files on my system so I always had to spend way too much time setting up meticulous filing systems. Now I don't think I need to care any more. I can type in a phrase I remember in a document or email, or a few keywords and boom, I have access to it. And this is with 2 1000 gig drives connected. Granted it took almost 36 hours to index the drives initially, but now everytime I save something it is instantly indexed. For most normal people and especially for small businesses I think this will be a big deal. I actually could care less about dashboard (most of the widgets I already have as menu widgets where they are more useful and accessible), but spotlight is revolutionary and will be more-so once it is widely deployed.

    9. Re:spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Wow, I want your magic powers. I want to be able to look out the window at 9AM and know what the high temperature will be at 4PM. That would rock, so I don't have to go to weather.yahoo.com every morning.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    10. Re:spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Good for you. Have a cookie.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    11. Re:spothlight...dashobard...who cares?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why on earth would 99.9% of the global population want to know what time is in other part of the world?

      'Cause 99.9% of the global population has friends, family or co-workers who don't live in the same time zone as them.

  35. FedEx? LOSER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and my copy of Tiger is riding around in a FedEx van at this very moment"

    Funny, mine is riding around bittorrent at the moment.

  36. Nested Folders by hey · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The NYT article says:

    It's an enhancement that's so deep, convenient and powerful, it threatens to reduce the 20-year-old Mac/Windows system of nested folders to irrelevance.

    Er, of course, it was Unix that had nested folders first. Also I was just thinking... I think it would be a pretty horrible world if users just put all their stuff in the same folder - with no attempts to categorize things. That would make for some very horrible folders. Hey, something like some people's inboxes, I suppose.

    Unlike desktop search tools that encourage people not to organgize - how about tools that make it easy to organize. Eg easy symlinks.
    1. Re:Nested Folders by Chucker23N · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, because we all know using Unix at home was very common 20 years ago.

      20 years ago, most home computer file systems /weren't/ hierarchical. The article is perfectly accurate.

      "Unlike desktop search tools that encourage people not to organgize - how about tools that make it easy to organize. Eg easy symlinks."

      Um, symlinks have to do with Metadata *how*?

    2. Re:Nested Folders by lexarius · · Score: 1

      I think Aliases fill the role of easy symlinks, even if they aren't real symlinks. I can make an alias, move the original file, and the alias still works. And if you not only know what a symlink is but know of a reason you might want one, then ln is still your friend.

    3. Re:Nested Folders by luiss · · Score: 1

      You're not getting the point of Spotlight. Look at the spotlight demo on Apple's site. Notice that the search is almost instantanous and that spotlight categorizes the search results! You don't need subfolders/symlinks etc to oranize because spotlight presents you the results in an organized fashion.

    4. Re:Nested Folders by koehn · · Score: 1

      I think you've just about answered your own question. People don't want to waste their time organizing everything -- that's why they bought a computer.

      I know I'll still tend to keep my stuff organized in folders, but for my wife (a pretty typical user) I know Spotlight's a godsend. Hell, it's a godsend for me too, and I'll tell you why: Spotlight lets me quickly find anything my computer knows about a topic. I don't always remember if that photo is in iPhoto, or an email message, or wherever. I installed Tiger last night, and after indexing my machine (which took about an hour, with the Dev tools installed), it was immediately apparent that Spotlight is really a life-changing event.

      And yes, spotlight is available from the command line: mdfind for search, mdls to list metadata for a file, mdutil for turning Spotlight on/off for a particular volume, etc.

    5. Re:Nested Folders by typhoonius · · Score: 1

      I think the trend is for the computer to organize your file hierarchy for you. Look at iTunes and iPhoto; you don't interact with the files directly, you work with them through the application and the database it keeps and through any associated devices (in this case, a digital music player or digital camera respectively). The applications name and sort your files for you, and you don't have to be directly aware of it if you don't want to.

      This has some advantages. The obvious one is that the program keeps track of metadata for you, so you can find your data based on what it is instead of what it's named or where it is. You also get a robust, specialized interface for each function; Microsoft sort of tried to do this in XP by bolting things onto Windows Explorer (thumbnail/slideshow views for pictures, artist/album column types for music, etc.), but that (arguably) just made the file manager sloppy and unwieldy. Of course, there isn't a special manager for every file you could possibly have, but I think this is generally the direction we're moving in (Spotlight's supposed to be an iTunes for your entire operating system, but I'd have to use it to judge for myself).

      The next biggest advantage is that you're offloading some mundane, repetitive thing (organizing your files) to the computer, where it belongs (it's better at it, after all). I think Apple's been making a lot of strides in this area; Automator, for instance, brings the power of scripting to the layman in a way even AppleScript couldn't. File paths are a somewhat arcane concept; you have to build and maintain a mental model of your file system. This isn't an incredibly draining task, but nonetheless, it's one better suited for a computer, so us human types can do what we're better at, which is creating all these files to begin with.

    6. Re:Nested Folders by cowscows · · Score: 1

      I think it's a matter of just the amount of information we're dealing with nowadays. Back when I was on my MacLC with a 40 Meg drive, I was very careful with what I saved, and where I put it. I had files inside folders inside folders inside folders, all carefully organized, and hardly ever changing. Now I've got a 150gig drive, and I download enough data to fill my LC's harddrive at least three times over pretty much each and every day.

      Broadband has made it really easy for me to constantly be adding stuff to my computer, software/files get more complex and harder to categorize, and so I've just ended up dumping most things into a temp folder, and then organizing it every few months. Not ideal, but reality.

      Good ol' fashioned organization and Spotlight are two different solutions to the same problem. Nothing wrong with a little choice. I don't see how the existence of spotlight will make life any more difficult for someone who consistently keeps their stuff organized already.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    7. Re:Nested Folders by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      The system of putting everything in one folder is called a "minidisk", and was still common on IBM VM/XA and VM/CMS systems a few years ago. Our IBM rep used to try to convince us that virtual piles of unnested minidisks were an ideal way to manage our files. After all, it worked so well on our physical desktops.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  37. what a load... by ericbrow · · Score: 1, Insightful
    This post reminds me of Pres. Bush's "town hall" meetings. This is just an orgy love fest without any real critical comments being made at all.

    This is not to be intreperted as M$ is number one. I question any article that's all flowers and hugs.

    1. Re:what a load... by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1

      Just wait until tomorrow where there will be at least an article that Tiger actually arrives, maybe some more reactionary articles later to something else. I'm kind of amazed this much hoopla is thrown for an upgrade. With Tiger, OS X remains basically the same. A couple things are changed or are faster and everyone here treats it as the second coming. I'm many times more interested in how Longhorn ends up because it's supposed to be a bigger change from XP than Tiger is from Jaguar. It's supposed to be as big of a change as Windows 95.

    2. Re:what a load... by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft are dropping features from Longhorn faster than an epileptic juggler on fire whose being attacked by ninjas. Who are also on fire. And they're all in a tall building during an earthquake. And the building's on fire as well.

    3. Re:what a load... by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1

      I'm reserving my judgement until Longhorn is on the shelves as to how it'll actually turn out. No use in wild speculation this far from the release date.

    4. Re:what a load... by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      OK, I'll bite.

      I think it's lame that the 2 hit new features are shameless ripoffs of existing shareware apps. Dashboard is to Konfabulator as Spotlight is to Launchbar. They may have some improvement over the original, but who could say with a straight face that they didn't get the idea from these shareware developers? Right down to Dashboard apps being called "Widgets", just like in Konfabulator. Was it really that hard to think up their own name for them? If they're creative enough to come up with the best OS around, can't they at least come up with their own name for them? Bill Gates at least called his version of the trash can the "recycle bin". And original ideas are like Kryptonite to him.

      Second, the WSJ reviewer notes occasionally odd slowdowns in his tests. What's happening is that he's run out of RAM and that's disk paging he's discovered. Which makes me wonder whether how well I can run Tiger. I have 768MB of RAM, a respectable amount, and running Safari and iTunes at the same time is easily enough to eat it all up, sending me to annoying disk-paging territory. Apple's apps are so fast because they gobble up as much RAM as they can. I switched away from Safari and iTunes, and I haven't had the problem since. How much RAM do you think Dashboard going to need?

      There, there's your critical rant. Of course I am still going to buy the damn thing.

  38. Re:It is viruses by varmittang · · Score: 1

    Actually, I believe it is virii. But since English people everywhere started spelling it viruses because it felt more natural spoken and written than virii. So viruses is becoming the norm now.

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  39. Rising incidence of parasitical software... by ites · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Another slashdot user predicted this something like a year and a half ago.

    "What percentage of Windows PCs are 0wn3d by one or other parasite?
    By multiple parasites? By spammers working with crackers working
    with corrupt web site designers and pornographers? Enough, I think
    to ensure that within a short time - say 6 to 12 months - we will
    hit infection levels of 50% and more. The vast majority of home
    PCs, happily connected to the Internet, will be hit, and a large
    proportion of office PCs, insufficiently secured and protected,
    will also succumb."

    This was written in September 2003. And it's just starting to hit the general consciousness now?

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:Rising incidence of parasitical software... by ites · · Score: 1

      Guilty as charged. Changing userids every few years makes one humble. I think ites is the 4th or 5th one so far.

      --
      Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    2. Re:Rising incidence of parasitical software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, i didn't understand it that way

  40. ah, calm down... by aendeuryu · · Score: 5, Funny

    The plural of virus is viruses.
    Writing "virri" doesn't make you look clever, educated people will laugh at you.


    Speak for yourself. Not all of us trot out our soapboxen for such little things.

  41. this guy calls himself a writer? by seven+of+five · · Score: 1
    Spotlight is far superior to add-on desktop search programs available for Microsoft Windows from Google and others, because it doesn't have to constantly "index" the hard disk, looking for new files while the disk spins constantly.


    And where was the copy editor?

    Yes, Tiger sounds very spiffy.
  42. Re:it like to crash alot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "windows xp x64 hasnt crashed once at winhec"

    That's pretty typical of Windows. Especially before you actually load it on a computer.

  43. Re:Need the G5 by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

    Well, I'd like to give it a try. Where do I download the source code?

  44. I don't understand nobody's talking about by HawkingMattress · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Their new automator framework, which let applications send streams of objects to each other and have them propose interfaces to interact with.
    (Well that's how it seems to work at least). It looks like the equivalent of unix pipes for desktop apps.
    Something i've been waiting for for years.

    1. Re:I don't understand nobody's talking about by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      Something i've been waiting for for years.

      Too bad you don't use KDE then, or you'd have been enjoying this feature for the past 5 years.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    2. Re:I don't understand nobody's talking about by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Hey, you aren't alone! Second to Spotlight I am drooling over the little robot buddy of Automator. I have specifically saved a few tasks that would normally be time consuming to try him out on.

      My system is backed up, my copy of Tiger is on some fedex ramp, I'm ready to go!

    3. Re:I don't understand nobody's talking about by rdc_uk · · Score: 1

      "Too bad you don't use KDE then, or you'd have been enjoying this feature for the past 5 years."

      Pffffh...

      You should actually go and LOOK at automator; watch the example video, then go back to your linked page, before comparing the two.

      Note the lack of needing to understand what "void refresh()" means in order to use Automator.

      Honestly, a little empathy would do the average "linux-power-user" a world of good; granny don't do void

    4. Re:I don't understand nobody's talking about by been42 · · Score: 1
      What Automator looks like to me is nothing but a system for building small AppleScripts using a series of menus. My dad just switched to Apple, and I've been writing little AppleScripts to let him do little things (like moving the files he leaves on the Desktop into the correct directories), and it looks like now I'm going to be replaced by Automator. I look forward to it.

      I think it's a big step toward an ultimate goal of an operating system that helps you use your applications, instead of an OS that gets in your way when you're trying to get work done, e.g. my dad doesn't want to worry about where he needs to save a song he downloaded, he just wants iTunes to play the song. He's a lot like me (and you too, I suspect). If he can spend 5 minutes in Automator to save 2 minutes of moving files every day, he will.

    5. Re:I don't understand nobody's talking about by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 3, Informative

      I hate to tell you this, but both of y'all got it wrong. We're learning a lot about our marketing here, and one of the things we're learning is that while ordinary people get Automator instantly, computer nerds don't. They tend to overthink it.

      The fundamental object in Automator is the action. Think of an action like an old-fashioned Unix command-line utility like "sort" or "uniq." Each one has an input and an output, kind of like "stdin" and "stdout" but more discriminating.

      Using Automator, you string together actions to create workflows. Workflows are kind of like pipelines. You start with one that generates some kind of output, then pass that output to another action, then to another, then to another.

      Example: Let's say you have ten pictures on your desktop, and you want to resize them all and add metadata like a copyright notice, something that's common to all 10. You go to Automator and start with the "Get selected Finder items" action, then click on the "Scale images" action, then click in the "Add Spotlight comments to Finder items" action. When you select the files and run the workflow, it does what you want.

      A more complex, real-world example. I use InCopy a lot. One of the things I always have to do is take an InCopy document, map styles to XML tags, export the document as XML, then run the resulting XML file through a little utility to strip out some InCopy weirdness that Adobe inserts. This is a fairly manually intensive process. I automated a chunk of it with an AppleScript about eighteen months ago when InCopy 3 first came out, but I still had to do the fiddly stuff by hand. Last fall, I created an Automator workflow that would let me call that AppleScript ("Run AppleScript" is an Automator action), then pass the output on to a pipeline of actions that processed it in just the way I needed. I now use that workflow several times every day.

      Like I said, normal people get it pretty quickly. Geeks seem to try to overthink it, to think about it in terms of object models and scripting.

    6. Re:I don't understand nobody's talking about by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Their new automator framework, which let applications send streams of objects to each other and have them propose interfaces to interact with.

      Dude, automator just rocks for pr0n! It even has a built in action that downloads all linked images from the current web page in Safari, and imports them into an iPhoto album automatically!

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  45. I'm upset that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Apple won't release Quicktime 7 for Windows on the same day... They're just releasing the Mac version. Why? YOU'RE KILLING US APPLE! Release Quicktime 7 for Windows simultaneously!

    1. Re:I'm upset that... by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      Why should they? If you want it that bad, switch. I switched a couple of months ago, and grow to love my PowerBook more and more each day. I wish I could replace my work Dell D800 with a PowerBook.

    2. Re:I'm upset that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha! Revenge for all those games that came out late for the mac!

  46. Looking forward to Automator, Dashboard, and iChat by amichalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone is a buzz about Spotloght and it is no doubt going to be great, but I am also looking forward to improving productivity with Automator.

    As with lots of scripting languages, sometimes it is just plain faster to brute force what you are doing than sit down, recall a language syntax and function set, write a script, give it a test, and then run it. What I see as cool about Automator is that it makes building a script so freaking easy and fast and since you can call scripts with scripts, you can build a nice function library of scripts to make the process even faster.

    I am also digging on Dashboard. At first I didn't like the idea of a second desktop that is different than the first, and I will have to try before I agree that it makes sense to keep these on a different desktop, but I love the idea of the small applets (I used Konfabulator breifly) for small tasks like weather, itunes, stock tickers, and calculator. That they take minimal system memory means I will be more apt to keep them open and within easy reach without having to launch the applicaiton.

    Lastly, I am totally excited about iChat AV supporting up to four people (including me) in a video chat. It just looks so cool to see three people sitting around the virtual room like that and this feature is making me finally break down and buy the iSight. It looks like the best autofocusing camera available for $150.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  47. Build Number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone confirm the build number of the actual shipped version - is it indeed 8A428 or something later?

    Can get this from "About this Mac", "More Info", then Software on the left pane.

    Cheers!

    1. Re:Build Number by Chucker23N · · Score: 1

      Yes, this has been confirmed a while ago.

      Btw, going to "About this Mac" and clicking on the version number also reveals the build number; the System Profiler isn't needed.

  48. Re:So what's really new?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one word --- Spotlight

    detaching the location of the file from file system organization is a huge leap conceptially. A real "quantum leap" -- seemingly small but makes a world of difference.

  49. How's this for a little verification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From here:

    "Dave had some surprises up his sleeve as well. You'll remember that I said he was using a ThinkPad (running Windows!). I asked him about that, and he told us that many of the computer security folks back at FBI HQ use Macs running OS X, since those machines can do just about anything: run software for Mac, Unix, or Windows, using either a GUI or the command line. And they're secure out of the box. In the field, however, they don't have as much money to spend, so they have to stretch their dollars by buying WinTel-based hardware. Are you listening, Apple? The FBI wants to buy your stuff. Talk to them!"

  50. Re:It is viruses by Jackdaw+Rookery · · Score: 1

    In an effort to end your insanity - the Oxford English Dictionary entry:

    Virus

    Etymology: a. L. virus slimy liquid, poison, offensive odour or taste. Hence also Fr., Sp., Pg. virus.
    1 Venom, such as is emitted by a poisonous animal. Also fig.

    2 Path. a A morbid principle or poisonous substance produced in the body as the result of some disease, esp. one capable of being introduced into other persons or animals by inoculations or otherwise and of developing the same disease in them. Now superseded by the next sense.

    b Pl. viruses.

    An infectious organism that is usu. submicroscopic, can multiply only inside certain living host cells (in many cases causing disease) and is now understood to be a non-cellular structure lacking any intrinsic metabolism and usually comprising a DNA or RNA core inside a protein coat (see also quot. 1977). [ Formerly referred to as filterable viruses, their first distinguishing characteristic being the ability to pass through filters that retained bacteria. ]

  51. Re:So what's really new?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well in that case, you obviously didn't actually read the list of new features.

  52. Re:Voice recognition - OPEN THE *** POD BAY DOORS! by Marbleless · · Score: 0

    OK, so who is the first MacVictim going to be? :)

    --
    --I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
  53. corollary by circusboy · · Score: 0

    "inside the RDF you get to hear everyone else scream..."

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  54. The best virus protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is to make your OS incompatible with 95% of other computers.

    To create the most stable operating system: control all hardware that goes in.

    1. Re:The best virus protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ... is to make your OS incompatible with 95% of other computers.

      ah, so that's how linux does it. they were even so forward looking as too make different flavors of linux incomatible with each other too.

    2. Re:The best virus protection by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      You know d00d, Mac OSX and Linux are just flavours of UNIX and Linux runs on anything from routers and cell phones, to desktops and mainframes. According to IBM marketing, Linux is the most used OS ever and runs on more than 2 billion devices. That is more than 4 times the market share of MS Windows. Despite all those billions of devices running Linux, there is not a single working Linux virus out there. The difference is in the design.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  55. Greatest Invention in the History of Mankind Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Tiger is the classiest version of Mac OS X ever and, by many measures, the most secure, stable and satisfying consumer operating system prowling the earth

    It sounds like he ran the article through the new hyperbolic chamber.

  56. Re:Anybody compiled it for the PC yet? by Chucker23N · · Score: 1

    Why don't you moron get off your hardware-specific ass and get a Mac? ;-)

    No operating system stands any chance against Microsoft Windows while on the same hardware platform as Microsoft Windows, unless it's completely free as in free beer (e.g. Linux).

    Mac OS X is already heavily subsidized with Apple's hardware and other sales, yet $129 is still too expensive for the average home user to consider. No, people just buy a new computer when they want a new operating system -- or they pirate it.

  57. When will Tiger ship with new Mac hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple's website still lists Panther as shipping with new Macs.

    1. Re:When will Tiger ship with new Mac hardware? by Colol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Beginning April 29th, upgrade discs will probably be stuffed into retail stock. I've never purchased a computer from the Apple Store Online, so I don't know if they do the same.

      Preinstalled, probably a week or two from Friday.

    2. Re:When will Tiger ship with new Mac hardware? by Steve+Fuller · · Score: 1

      Well, Tiger is shipping on the newest Mac hardware already.

      Just ordered a 2.7 GHz system, and it included a link to the Tiger Online Seminar.

      I haven't heard anything about when it will be available on the older Macs.

  58. My #1 reason by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
    I find the interfaces to be better under Mac OS. In particular, I use both the Windows and Mac versions of Photoshop on a regular basis, and the Windows version is just... clunky. It could just be me, but I have always despised the MDI approach to interfaces. Even with the base window fully expanded, I feel trapped in a box. Give me freeform windows floating where I want them to. Add Expose to this, and it's so easy to jump around different windows and different programs.

    There's just a plethora of little reasons too numerous list here.

  59. Re:Need the G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    OK, I'll play along...

    You're gonna do what with source code to an operating system you don't have? Cross-compile it on your VAX?

  60. Jesus called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said he doesn't exist and certainly isn't God, and it's about damn time you took some fucking responsibility for your actions instead of trying to blame "God" for everything that goes wrong in your life, you damn fuckup.

    1. Re:Jesus called by beef+curtains · · Score: 1

      Let's review: "Jesus called He said he doesn't exist..."

      So, in summary, you say you're receiving phonecalls from someone who you also say doesn't exist...would that make you schizophrenic, delusional, or just high?

      --
      Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
    2. Re:Jesus called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All three. At least I know mine are drug induced delusions though, which gives me a better grip on reality than most bible bashers.

    3. Re:Jesus called by MasterOfUniverse · · Score: 1
      So, in summary, you say you're receiving phonecalls from someone who you also say doesn't exist...would that make you schizophrenic, delusional, or just high?

      No, I'm just a liar ;)

      --
      "There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people."--Howard Zinn
    4. Re:Jesus called by MetaMarty · · Score: 1

      No you're missing the whole point. Jesus called and said he didn't exist. It's not the original poster who claims Jesus doesn't exist, but Jesus himself. You also forgot to mention what Jesus said on the phone. He said you shouldn't blame God on what goes wrong in your life. Your review should at least mention this.

    5. Re:Jesus called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one bible basher, eschew drug induction, lest it sober me up.
      Life is an account from which we withdraw at a fixed rate. These runs on the bank are t3h st00p3d.

    6. Re:Jesus called by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 1

      Well, you know... It's really hard to parade fiction around as fact without omitting really important details like that. So cut the Bible thumpers a little slack, they have a tough job.

  61. Re:Sure... by zpok · · Score: 1

    Beating a dead horse, but still... You have any idea which computer (and processor) Linus uses nowadays?

    Hint: it's not AMD.

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  62. Pshaw by SubtleNuance · · Score: 3, Informative

    Want meta-data search (spotlight) on GNU/Linux? Try installing Beagle.

    From Beagle's webpage; "Beagle is a search tool that ransacks your personal information space to find whatever you're looking for. Beagle can search in many different domains:

    documents
    emails
    web history
    IM/IRC conversations
    source code
    images
    music files
    applications ...and much more

    Have a look at uber hacker Nat Friedman's videos of hot Beagle Action.

    In short, beware teh Gnome.

    1. Re:Pshaw by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      You may also find Dashboard interesting...

    2. Re:Pshaw by GaryPatterson · · Score: 4, Informative

      So can it search for relationships between files? Not just metadata, content of filename, but stuff like "show me the emails with the picture of the dog that I sent to members of my family"?

      SpotLight is not just metadata plus content. It's also about relationships between objects. You can create relationships by dragging objects about (say a picture of a dog onto an email to family members) and SpotLight remembers them in detail (the dog metadata in the image is then in a relationship with the people in the email address fields, as well as the email itself and any objects inside it).

      This seems like a new thing to me.

    3. Re:Pshaw by Compenguin · · Score: 1

      (Nat's) Dashboard is beagle

    4. Re:Pshaw by Unxmaal · · Score: 2, Informative

      "You can create relationships by dragging objects about (say a picture of a dog onto an email to family members) and SpotLight remembers them in detail (the dog metadata in the image is then in a relationship with the people in the email address fields, as well as the email itself and any objects inside it)."

      No, you can't.

      That's a potential future of Spotlight, but not a current capability.

      --
      http://unxmaal.com
    5. Re:Pshaw by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      From the Web site:

      The most recent version of Beagle is 0.0.9, which was released on April 7, 2005.

      Giving your product a version number with two zeros in front of it really goes a long way toward inspiring customer confidence, you know?

      Also from the Web site:

      This page will take you through the steps involved in obtaining and installing Beagle. user: Nono just forget it, it's impossible anyway and if you DO get it to work you whole day is wasted already so you should not even try unless you want to waste your time.

      You guys can't seriously be telling me this is Linux' answer to Spotlight, can you?

  63. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by zoomba · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did you just honestly use Enlightenment .17 in an argument? Isn't that like saying "Game X sure is great, but hell, Duke Nukem Forever will blow it away" ?

  64. Who's stalking Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you all know, the first thing to do when you're being stalked by an ugly mob with redcurrants is to -- release The Tiger!

  65. Re:it like to crash alot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    acutally if you check out the stream archive of bill's keynote they are running lightwave 3D 64 bit on xpx64 and its runs extremely smooth.

  66. you should buy a lottery ticket by toby · · Score: 2, Informative
    The only way to answer your question, is you should spend some time evaluating OS X. If the applications you need daily simply aren't available for it, then that's a dealbreaker.

    Just about all diehard Windows users I've shown OS X & Mac to are completely won over by it in a matter of minutes or hours. The user experience is rewarding, productive and ... fun! After seeing Tiger's "RSS Visualiser" screensaver - one of the most trivial features - one guy here decided on the spot to sell all his PCs.

    For a software developer, OS X is particularly compelling.

    --
    you had me at #!
  67. Re:So what's really new?? by acidblue · · Score: 1
    You are actually saying that you did not read this list?

    Over 200 New Features

    Those are new. I mean, you don't find anything "new" in there? C'mon! XCode 2, Spotlight, Automater, iSync capabilities, GCC 4.0, on and on.

  68. Image ops on powermac 1 ghz g4 by acomj · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a dual 1 ghz power mac. I have a lot of ram 1.5 gig, and manipulate images in photoshop 7. Without core image acceleration its very good, especially with some of my larger images which can by 100 megs each. The only time the wait is anoying is when i'm using genuin fractals "degrain" filters which are slow (20-30 seconds) but work very well.

    It even edits video ok. All without the core image.

    My understanding of core image api is if the machine can't send the operations to the unsupported video card it just uses the main processor. minis have 1.2-1.4 ghz so they should work prety well for any image task thrown at it.

    A g5 would improve things for anyone really into hardcore editing..

    1. Re:Image ops on powermac 1 ghz g4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this has WHAT to do with Mac Minis, you nitwit?

    2. Re:Image ops on powermac 1 ghz g4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac minis will run CoreImage in software, just as he said. The whole Mac mini CoreImage malarkey is ridiculous.

    3. Re:Image ops on powermac 1 ghz g4 by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have a lot of ram 1.5 gig, and manipulate images in photoshop 7. Without core image acceleration its very good, especially with some of my larger images which can by 100 megs each.

      Neat, when did Photoshop 7 get real-time, non-destructive effects? I don't even have them in Photoshop 8.

      My understanding of core image api is if the machine can't send the operations to the unsupported video card it just uses the main processor. minis have 1.2-1.4 ghz so they should work prety well for any image task thrown at it.

      All CoreImage units are written to take advantage of the new QuartzExtreme layer. About three quarters of those are written to degrade to AltiVec if you don't have a supported GPU. About a third of the CoreImage units run fine under software rendering. If you have a Mac with a G4 that supports QuartzExtreme but doesn't have a GPU for CoreImage you'll only be missing out on a few effects. Most notably the ripple effect.

      The ripple effect makes my nipples hard.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    4. Re:Image ops on powermac 1 ghz g4 by object88 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The ripple effect makes my nipples hard.

      Jean-Louis Gassee? Is that you?

    5. Re:Image ops on powermac 1 ghz g4 by aarku · · Score: 1

      Photoshop has absolutely nothing to do with Core Image. It doesn't use it, and according to Adobe never will. Applications do not magically start using it.

  69. Please do... by Marthisdil · · Score: 0

    ...consider dumping Windows altogether and switching to Apple's Macintosh..

    Please - by all means, let 100 million people switch from MS to Apple. Then the virus, spyware, adware, and trojan authors will have targets sufficient of their time and energy, and then the world will see how idiotic people are for saying "...is more secure, stable..."

    1. Re:Please do... by unconfused1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When are you people going to stop chanting the inaccurate 'popularity' mantra? Windows' insecurity and number of viruses/worms/adware/spyware/etc that target it are because of how tremendously susceptible it is to having such things created and implemented against it. Read the bulletings from SecurityFocus and CERT...you will find quickly that those insecurities in Windows are often caused by improper implementations of their own technologies. Making a claim that it is all about how many people use a specific operating system that makes an OS a target is unfounded. It is the insecurity of the system in the first place that taunts the virus writers...a large user base is just the bonus.

  70. WHAT THE HELL by jcoleman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am the only one who's totally pissed off that not only is there a MICROSOFT ad on this article (probably appearing on others, but this one especially) but it HONKS A HORN AT FULL VOLUME? What is wrong with SlashDot?

    Coleman

    PS It scared the crap out of me.

    1. Re:WHAT THE HELL by klang · · Score: 1

      what are those "ads" you talk about? ..getfirefox.com, then adblock

    2. Re:WHAT THE HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod me redundant. What Ads?

    3. Re:WHAT THE HELL by Goo.cc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking as a subscriber, no.

    4. Re:WHAT THE HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.alterslash.org

      Slashdot, with all the crap pruned out.

    5. Re:WHAT THE HELL by dr00g911 · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who uses Pith Helmet in Safari, no.

      Flash, 'troll bridge' or layer ads on the site = ad block, no exceptions.

    6. Re:WHAT THE HELL by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      Speaking as an AdBlock user, no.

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
  71. Spotlight has a shortcomming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the files you don't even remember?

    I already had some nice moments stumbling upon some old letters to my ex-girl, or some old video I made, while searching for something. These are things I just come to read or watch because for some unexplainable reason they've made it to my monitor! =)

    Spotlight only searches for what you ask, and once someone get used to it, the fun of folder exploring will definitely go away...

    1. Re:Spotlight has a shortcomming! by graphicsguy · · Score: 1

      So now you will stumble onto forgotten items as unexpected search results rather than unexpected files in a directory traversal. So I think we still have conservation of fun.

  72. Proper comparison by lar3ry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hardly XP Home.

    Apple has got this one right. There is NO "OS X Light." There's just one O/S to serve them all...

    OS X comes with web server (Apache), SSH server (where's that in XP anything?), a SQL database, and many other things that you can't get without XP Professional or even Win2000/2003 Server.

    Now, most of those "advanced" services are turned off by default, but they are there if you want to use them, and don't cost anything (other than the space they take up) if you don't ever configure them.

    I think Microsoft's OS strategy sucks, because it generalizes: I need Win2003 Server Standard Edition--or is it Enterprise Edition?--to get some of the services I need, but need XP (Home,Professional) to get the desktop bubblegum that my kids want. I can't pick and choose--Microsoft does it for me and I don't get a say in their selections!

    Of course, you can always get freeware/shareware or commercial add-ons, but that ups the price of the OS.

    So... the proper comparison is OS X would be to purchase XP Professional with bits of Windows 2003 Server (total cost, mucho dinero!).

    Who wants to bet that Microsoft will continue this silly strategy with Longhorn? I can see it now: Longhorn Home, Longhorn Professional, Longhorn Advanced Server, Longhorn Lite, Longhorn Media Edition, Longhorn Tablet Edition, Longhorn Pocket Edition... And what will developers target? (This requires Longhorn Home, with some bits of Longhorn Server, but is incompatible with the display driver in Longhorn Tablet...)

    --
    "May I have ten thousand marbles, please?"
    1. Re:Proper comparison by metallic · · Score: 0, Troll

      Or you could just download Apache 2.x for Windows, install Cygwin and get an SSH server, and download either MySQL or PostgreSQL for a database server. All for free and all will run on Windows XP Home.

      --
      Karma: Positive. Mostly effected by cowbell.
    2. Re:Proper comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Or you could just download Apache 2.x for Windows, install Cygwin and get an SSH server, and download either MySQL or PostgreSQL for a database server. All for free and all will run on Windows XP Home.


      Yeah, 'cause that's just as good as what OS X offers.

    3. Re:Proper comparison by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I know the OS is great but what about your basic "office" applications? Word processing, spreadsheet, presentation, database. I hate to buy Microsoft Office or any other office suite when Open Office is good and free but I hear that it sucks big time on the Mac due to UI issues.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    4. Re:Proper comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OS X comes with web server (Apache), SSH server (where's that in XP anything?), a SQL database, and many other things that you can't get without XP Professional or even Win2000/2003 Server.

      A devil's advocate might ask why a typical home user needs a web server, SSH server, and SQL server, unused and taking up space on their hard drive.

    5. Re:Proper comparison by BronxBomber · · Score: 1

      "So... the proper comparison is OS X would be to purchase XP Professional with bits of Windows 2003 Server (total cost, mucho dinero!)."

      This is comparing apples to oranges. Why do you need to run WinServer 2003 (Standard, Enterprise, or otherwise) on the same network that you need to provide your kids with their "desktop bubblegum"? Its the wrong tool for the problem.
      But lets just say for sake of argument that you are (or do need to).

      Knowing the average intelligence of the average user is below average, how feasible is it for this user to "pick and choose" what services they want out of your utopian single OS solution?

      You can "choose" to run any OS software implementations (Postgres, MySQL, Apache, etc) on your barebones Win2K3 server if you so choose. Or dont buy any of it and pick a Linux flavor. There's your choice!

      If you really want your kids to run IIS 5.1 on the same box their using to chat up AOL chatrooms then go ahead and spend the extra 50 bucks on XP Pro, but seriously, besides that - do you need to sit there and puzzle over the "myriad of differences" between Home and XP?

      Oh wait, but maybe you want to run a DNS server off your kid's XP Pro box. Thats a fun project.

      yet another /. inconsistency - MS provides me with too many choices and generalizations! MS doesnt give me enough options!

      --
      ...both interiorlly, and exteriorlly.
    6. Re:Proper comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      powerpoint replacement: keynote (much nicer)

      word replacement: document or whatever they called it.. i haven't actually used it yet.

      excel replacement: uhhh.. idunno, openoffice?

      office 2k4 for osx is much better than the previous version, although it's still kind of a hog. there's also a TON of free/cheap apps to replace the functionality of virtually anything. check out http://www.macupdate.com/

    7. Re:Proper comparison by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      http://www.neooffice.org/

      It's a Java/Aqua version of OpenOffice. It works, but it's not entirely perfect yet. The main missing feature in my opinion is using the standard Aqua interface for the main toolbars, etc.

      The menus are already Aqua. :)

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    8. Re:Proper comparison by MattHaffner · · Score: 1

      Other poster has the "Aqua"-fied version being worked on to give a more native feel, but you can run OOo in X11 already. It's no different than running it on most other Unix boxen then.

    9. Re:Proper comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you use an open source OS? And please explain to me how freeware ups the cost of the OS (I can see several potential lines of argument here, but I don't buy into any of them)?

    10. Re:Proper comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And an angelic advocate would reply by pointing out that hard drive space costs less than a dollar a gig these days, so you might as well ship a "kitchen sink" OS to everybody who buys it and let the user decide what services they want to switch on.

    11. Re:Proper comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serve them all? Don't you mean

      "One OS to rule them all..." ;)

    12. Re:Proper comparison by jafac · · Score: 1

      OS X comes with web server (Apache), SSH server (where's that in XP anything?),

      RDP. XP (Pro) comes with Remote Desktop built-in. Apple's Remote Admin app leaves a bit to be desired, not much better than VNC IMO. On the bright side, I can RDP my windows machine from my Mac. And Virtual PC is nice and snappy (when I'm Remote Desktopping my XP machine via VPC).

      Although, I wish RDP would support hosing apps without forcing the entire windows desktop on the user.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    13. Re:Proper comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's Remote Admin app leaves a bit to be desired, not much better than VNC IMO.

      Sure, if all you're interested in is remote control. But Apple Remote Desktop kicks some serious ass when it comes to rolling out updates to multiple Macs, reporting, and all kinds of other nitty-gritty, repetitive admin work.

    14. Re:Proper comparison by anonicon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "OS X comes with web server (Apache), SSH server (where's that in XP anything?), a SQL database, and many other things that you can't get without XP Professional or even Win2000/2003 Server."

      You can get them all for free. Use Google, you may have heard of it.

      "I think Microsoft's OS strategy sucks"

      I think Apple sucks because you have to pay an obscene premium for old, was new-one-to-two-years-ago hardware (plus $249 for AppleCare) if you want to use OS X.

      OS X is terrific. The CPUs and FSB are also terrific, although it's hard to tell if IBM is beginning to "pull a Motorola" now. Everything else in those PCs are Apple scamming their Macolytes. Microsoft sucks in many ways too, no doubt, but I'd rather pay the $100 Microsoft tax for WinXP Home than pay the much worse Apple tax.

      Of course, YMMV.

    15. Re:Proper comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...Or you could just download Apache 2.x for Windows, install Cygwin and get an SSH server, and download either MySQL or PostgreSQL for a database server...."

      If Billy boy knew you were using FLOSS products on *his* OS, he'd come yank your EULA away. Also, Apache does not recommend running the Windblows port for anything that faces the front lines. Its more for use in a "trusted" environment.

    16. Re:Proper comparison by chochos · · Score: 1
      There's just one O/S to serve them all...

      And in the Spotlight find them.

    17. Re:Proper comparison by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      Broadband + web server + DynDNS = self-hosted website.

      There's plenty of people that might like to be able to host their own website. If you want to put up a website for family members and your broadband provider supports servers (may require a "business" account) it isn't terribly difficult to make one. You can also with a little bit of reading set up a fully dynamic company website hosted from your back office.

      If say you're in a dorm in college with a publicly accessible IP you can run your blog or gaming news site or whatever from the Mac mini under your desk without needing to be a security guru or really needing all that much experience.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    18. Re:Proper comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point out a flaw in a MacUser's argument, get modded troll!

      I guess that just points out how irrational and illogical mac users are, which explains many of their arguments.

    19. Re:Proper comparison by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      Although, I wish RDP would support hosing apps
      Apparently you've never used RDP...
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    20. Re:Proper comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the same "advocates" generally call windows "bloated"... hmm.

    21. Re:Proper comparison by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      "OS X comes with web server (Apache), SSH server (where's that in XP anything?), a SQL database, and many other things that you can't get without XP Professional or even Win2000/2003 Server."

      apache costs how much?
      openssh costs how much?
      mysql costs how much?

      All of which run on windows, either natively, or using cygwin.

      Making these things seem "exclusive" to the Mac world is trolling imo.

    22. Re:Proper comparison by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      The complaint with the UI OO.org for mac os x isn't that it's any worse than the OO UI on other platforms, but that it's exactly the same.

      Mixing GUI metaphors can be really annoying for any sort of serious workflow.

    23. Re:Proper comparison by SeaFox · · Score: 1
      Who wants to bet that Microsoft will continue this silly strategy with Longhorn? I can see it now: Longhorn Home, Longhorn Professional, Longhorn Advanced Server, Longhorn Lite, Longhorn Media Edition, Longhorn Tablet Edition, Longhorn Pocket Edition... And what will developers target? (This requires Longhorn Home, with some bits of Longhorn Server, but is incompatible with the display driver in Longhorn Tablet...)

      The variations have been known for a little while and can be found here.

    24. Re:Proper comparison by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Of course you have to look at what is said to "suck" about it.

      When running on a Mac, if it doesn't look like a Mac app and act like a Mac app, it sucks. But with the same look/feel/action on any other system it would fit right in.

      I'm notot saying the interface is the only problem, that just seems to be what you hear the most about.

    25. Re:Proper comparison by studentAtTheOnlyTech · · Score: 1

      wait! Is there really OS X Tablet or Pocket edition? That would be fantastic though to see apple icons in the dock jumping all over the PDA screen taking up the entire screen.

    26. Re:Proper comparison by bani · · Score: 1

      this is why apple should adopt Qt as an official framework, and work to get it tightly integrated with aqua. Why? Because it makes it simple to port applications from other platforms -- one of the things which is killing ports like openoffice atm.

      Right now you can use Qt, but it requires xdarwin and it does not integrate with aqua, no way no how . not to mention the heavy lifting required by xdarwin (which also hurts performance).

  73. How is Spotlight any different.. by d_jedi · · Score: 1
    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
    1. Re:How is Spotlight any different.. by k2r · · Score: 1

      If I got it right: It isn't just a fulltext-search on your data but it searches file metadata.
      Any application can provide a kind of a simple plugin - invisible for the user - that enables spotlight to analyze this applications exotic data, too.

      k2r

    2. Re:How is Spotlight any different.. by lachlan76 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's built in at the filesystem level, and as a result files are indexed immediately when they are modified, rather than at the next search pass.

      Spotlight also has a plugin architecture so that developers can add new file format parsers.

    3. Re:How is Spotlight any different.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTTOMH,

      1. Spotlight indexes your files incrementally as they are created and saved. Google Desktop Search crushes your performance at regular intervals to build its index, adding at least one additional read-from-disk operation per byte to the system load.

      2. Spotlight has the same look-and-feel as the rest of the OS. GDS has its own l&f.

      3. Spotlight can be called up instantaneously by typing Command-Space. GDS requires a browser.

      4. Spotlight works on my PowerMac. I had to uninstall GDS from my Dell because of performance reasons, and it doesn't work at all on my PowerMac.

    4. Re:How is Spotlight any different.. by Wabin · · Score: 1

      different FROM! different FROM! (or if you are more British than American, different TO!) Grammar on /.: a waste of my time, I know.

      --
      Most exciting phrase in science: not "Eureka!" but "Hmm... That's funny..." -Asimov (abridged for \. limits)
    5. Re:How is Spotlight any different.. by peebeejay · · Score: 1

      You are my friend, but we fight a losing battle.

  74. Re:So what's really new?? by circusboy · · Score: 2, Informative
    the biggest things that have changed in the OS are really below the surface.

    for the developer, I think CoreData, CoreImage, CoreVideo...

    the thing there is that when developers take advantage of this, you will need to upgrade to use the neat new features in those new applications that take advantage of them.

    CoreAudio, from panther, made creating audio plug-ins (for logic, live, etc.) relatively easy to build functions that work in a variety of applications as they are based on the architecture of the OS rather than the plug-in architecture of a particular application. (apologies for the sentence structure...)

    I would love to see the ability to create image filters that could be used in a variety of manipulation programs, ( btw, is the CoreSet available to darwin?) and have it then be possible to generate a simple image manipulation framework that relied entirely on CoreImage/Video units.

    having tried demos recently (of live and logic), it makes it easier to choose the application based on its core usability, rather than the presence of a particular reverb. the Audio Units work the same in both environments. Shake already does something similar, its composite trees are based on nodes, which are themselves based on command line modules, now move that thought out to the OS level, and make it available to every application.

    ...is it just me or does this seem like small tools and pipes...

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  75. hah by curbion · · Score: 1

    I've got Virii in my boxen , I don't belive someone else remembers that toon . I would post a link but i can't find it . CheerIii for the nostalgii

    --
    Im a robot your a robot , That however is a row-boat
  76. Re:So what's really new?? by robbieduncan · · Score: 1

    So Spotlight, CoreImage and CoreData APIs are nothing? Whilst only SpotLight is immediately visible to an end user the underlying API changes will make it much easier to develop for.

    No one is forcing you to upgrade. If you don't want it don't buy it. Just don't come whining when some cool new app requires Tiger.

  77. and that would be total suicide for Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If Mac OS X could be installed to any computer, yeah people would buy it. But Apple makes all their money in the hardware. If nobody's buying the hardware, they lose a HUUUUGE amount of their profit, and I seriously doubt software sales could ever make up for it.

    Also, if Apple did it, they would be more or less forced to do it so that you could dual-boot the system between Windows and OS X (and even if they didn't, people would bitchandmoan and buy programs to make it do that anyway). Then if Windows and OS X are on the same computer, and you are suchandsuch software developer who is probably used to devloping for Windows, there's zero incentive to make an app for OS X, since people can just reboot to get Windows up.

    So that leaves Apple with...an iPod and an OS nobody makes software for or buys the hardware for. Nice buisness model.

    (for the record, my name is normally Bizitmap, not an anonymous coward, but I'm not on the computer which has my password in autocomplete, and I kinda forgot what it was =3 )

  78. Homer Simpson must be writing reviews now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any one here seen the Simpsons episode starting with Homer trying to squeeze an orange with his chin to make orange juice? At the same time he is watching on TV a commercial for an oranges squeezing machine advertised as revolusionary because it allows people to stop squeezing oranges with their chin! Homer obviously buys one.
    Anyway, my point is that this "revolutionary" new feature from apple makes me think of Homer. Do actually any of you have such great trouble finding lost files that you require such a search function?
    I mean whats the point in using a search engine if you already need to know what to look for? If you know what to look for you probably also know were to look for, unless you are in the habit of systematically randomly distributing your files!

    1. Re:Homer Simpson must be writing reviews now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Some people have more advanced search needs than where they put their Sailor Moon vore slash fanfic...

      Dunce...

    2. Re:Homer Simpson must be writing reviews now by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      I have to agree, it looks like there's some great stuff in Tiger, but I just can't seem to care about file searching. I've been accumulating files and data for well over 20 years now, and I never find myself looking for files I can't find.

      I guess this is a great boon for the disorganized though.

      I, personally, think the Dashboard and Automator stuff is much more interesting than Spotlight, but Spotlight seems to get all the attention.

  79. So to sum up.... by ZipR · · Score: 1

    It's Greeeeaaaaaaatttttt!

    1. Re:So to sum up.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clean out your office cause you're fucking fired.

  80. Re:What a suprise! by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Well, clearly, you have never used one, but it is all your loss, not ours...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  81. Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mini isn't "supposed" to be a high end workstation...

    Hell for ~300 more you could buy a friggin G5 (1500)
    or a powerbook (not an ibook...a POWERbook.) or the high end ibook with a superdrive...

    Mini is supposed to be a cheap ass Mac Box to compete with a cheap ass WinBox.

    And all your old stuff isn't useless..Check to see if your Video Card has mac drivers for it (Nvidia / ATI have used the same chipsets bi-platform before so its possible) On the DVD burner just buy a external USB/FireWire case for it (~40-60) and it'll work just fine.

    1. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mini isn't "supposed" to be a high end workstation...

      But for the cost of a Mini, I can get something performing at the level of a decent workstation. Following the GP's example, I priced up a mac mini and amd64 box from the store around here:

      Mac Mini 80GB. 749.00
      Samsung 1GB. . 185.00
      Subtotal . . . 934.00
      PST (Ontario) ..74.72
      GST (Canada) . .65.38
      Grand Total .1,074.10

      Here's the AMD box with basically the same stuff (I already have an excessive number of optical drives and a video card, so I don't need to include those in my cost):

      Shuttle SN95G5 . .390.00
      Athlon 64 3200+. .244.00
      512MB x2 DDR400. .108.00
      WD 250GB 7200RPM. 172.00
      Subtotal. . . . . 914.00
      PST (Ontario) . . .73.12
      GST (Canada) . . . 63.98
      Grand Total. . .1,051.10

      (Since I already have a video card and software for the PC...)

      The Mini *isn't* "a cheap ass" box. For anyone that already has a PC with a video card and CD drive, it's at the same price level as a well-performing PC box that would be suitable for a professional.

      Since I already own all the software I need for Windows, I need to pay for it all *again* in order to switch to the mac. And there are no discounts of any sort on OSX (I can get an Edu WinXP Pro license for free from my University).

      (OT: Formatting tables in slashcode is brutal...)

  82. Every silver cloud has a grey lining by subl33t · · Score: 1

    "...spotlight means you no longer care where things are, they simply exist and the context becomes the "path"..." ...which is soooo much easier than putting something where it BELONGS!

    For the sarcasm impaired the above comment was sarcasm.

    What happens if (when) 'spotlight' throws a gear and can't properly search for context and the users have dropped their files where-ever the hell the wanted to?

    The problem with newer OS's is that they're simple enough for any f**king idiot to use.

    Newslfash! Computers aren't simple! They are immensely complex. Modern OS's are TOO easy for anyone to pick up use. And when these simple users get their data munged or lost they'll blame the OS vendor rather than take responsibility for their own ignorance.

  83. But which karma whore is the parent's originator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    7. Slashdot smartass
    You probably use SuSE or Mandrake, which increases your productivity some 300% over that of any given competing product, or rather would if you wouldn't waste your time copy'n'pasting (yes, X supports it at long last!) stupid second-hand cliches from some lame website into slashdot. You hang around and wait until you get "Score:5, Funny", then you go to the bathroom and jerk off.

  84. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by Zemplar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As always, it depends on the work you do. For me, it's either Windows or Mac to get the hardware support for one of my machines (every other machine is a *nix) slide scanners and other 'strange' hardware I really need to use. OF COURSE I'd prefer the Mac over the Windows machine anyday! So then, if you take your hardware costs coupled WITH software costs the Mac breaks even to a dreadful Windows box when you account for ALL the requried software to be as productive. For example, a antivirus subscription, firewall, spyware removal, good defragger, good backup, and many others...

  85. Re:Looking forward to Automator, Dashboard, and iC by evilplushtoy · · Score: 1

    Just a note about iChat AV and its ability to do a 4 person chat. They don't advertise this, but apparently you need a G5 to initiate the chats. If your Mac is anything less, like a notebook or the Mini, you're S.O.L.

  86. Re:Sure... by PaisteUser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You betcha... when it runs on an AMD processor. I would love to, but since Apple refuses to look at other hardware than what they have on their machines it isn't going to happen.

    You have to give credit to Apple for one thing though, by controlling the hardware that the software runs on, they can pretty much guarentee a good end-user expirience, less possible combinations of hardware to worry about, and makes it possible to include every piece of hardware that apple approves in the O/S. It makes the development cycle alot shorter when you only have one platform with specific hardware to worry about. Granted it's a different way of doing things then every other O/S and computer on the market, but it works for people who know that the product they by will never have driver problems, you just have to pay a little bit more for that quality assurance.

    --
    root@allevil:~#
  87. The petty annoyances by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Usng both a Windows2K (was using XP for a while as well) computer and a Mac day to day, I can list some little things that annoy me on Windows that are solved by the Mac:

    Lots of windows? Taskbar has two modes, neither of whcih work very well - either fold your icons together and make it really a bother to get to, or have the taskbar go to multiple lines. Expose is just SO much better a way of dealing with finding multiple windows.

    Macs don't ever hide menu items just because you've not used them for a while.

    Ever had a Windows Window no respond to you because a modal dialgue has popped up somewhere and that window is now obscuring it? Well, I have and Macs do not have that problem due to a much more intelligent way of handlind modal popups (it's embedded in the window that spawned it).

    Config files for every app that are really text and editible (or removable) by hand.

    UNIX utilities as first-class members of the OS and not something that clings to life within the system. Yeah I'm looking at you Cygwin!

    Usable simple text editing app (TextEdit). Both Wordpad and Notepad have unique issues that means you can't just automatically use one or the other (why do you think they are both still there). Heck in Tiger you can just use TextEdit for 99% of your word processing since it reads/writes Word files and supports things like tables.

    Everything supports save as PDF through printing interface. No need to use Acrobat.

    A home directory that reallly is in one place!!! You don't have to search the whole hard drive to REALLY back up all your app settings. They are all under ~/Library.

    When people talk about being more productive on a Mac, these are the kinds of things they mean. It's all the little annoyances that are part of using Windows day to day... you don't notice them after a while but each one makes you just a tiny bit slower and interrupts your workflow. In my experience Macs have a better sustained throughput for humans. Sure if you're just sitting there typing a letter one may not be faster than the other, but it's when you have to stop typing and make transitions when your odds of being interrupted are lower on Mac.

    And for less subtle reasons - Spotlight? Dashboard? Automator? These are pretty compelling reasons all on thier own, especially if you can write code at all. And if you can't then Automator should be even more compelling.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The petty annoyances by fermion · · Score: 1
      Ever had a Windows Window no respond to you because a modal dialgue has popped up somewhere and that window is now obscuring it? Well, I have and Macs do not have that problem due to a much more intelligent way of handlind modal popups (it's embedded in the window that spawned it).

      I stil have occasional issues with modal popups. Mostly to do with full screen video and something in the background wanting attention. It is not a major annoyance, but I do watch movies while crunching something in the background.

      I do aggree that one biggie over MS Windows is text edit. It is small and full featured. No need to load MS Word or OO.org. I think the problem with MS Windows is that MS want everyone to buy MS Word, so the OS level editors are crap.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:The petty annoyances by AlinuxNCSU · · Score: 1
      Usable simple text editing app (TextEdit). Both Wordpad and Notepad have unique issues that means you can't just automatically use one or the other (why do you think they are both still there). Heck in Tiger you can just use TextEdit for 99% of your word processing since it reads/writes Word files and supports things like tables.

      Whoa there! I'm sorry for going off-topic, but TextEdit supports tables?!? Are you sure?

      I love my PowerBook, but the one thing that bothers me about it is the lack of a decent editor, requiring me to load up Word whenever I want to type anything remotely complicated.

      As far as I know, TextEdit doesn't do margins, headers, footers, pagebreaks, or footnotes, to say nothing of tables. I would be very interested in knowing if TextEdit can do anything like that. In that respect, I consider WordPad (and it's predecessor Write) superior to TextEdit.

      I'm not asking for something as full featured as Word. But when I can't even set my margins...

      -Alinux

    3. Re:The petty annoyances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TextEdit supports Tables and Lists in Tiger.

    4. Re:The petty annoyances by philml · · Score: 1

      Ever had a Windows Window no respond to you because a modal dialgue has popped up somewhere and that window is now obscuring it? Well, I have and Macs do not have that problem

      Oh how I wish this was the case. I love my Mac, and this is the thing that annoys me most. Application modal dialogues exist all over the place (many Apple apps). Switch to a different program and then go back to the other -- often you can't. You can't click the program's window and activate it as the modal dialog exists, but you can't see it to click it! And Exposé won't show it. Try messing around with the "Do you want to save?" dialogs when you quit apps to see what I mean. A real pain in the neck, and I really hope Apple has sorted it in Tiger.

      On the other hand, if this is my biggest complaint about the Apple UI (which it is), that's great! I could talk for much longer about Windows... amazing how one of the richest companies in the world just doesn't get it...

    5. Re:The petty annoyances by teridon · · Score: 1
      UNIX utilities as first-class members of the OS and not something that clings to life within the system. Yeah I'm looking at you Cygwin!

      I love my Mac at work, but I use Win2k at home. Have you tried Windows Services for UNIX? Intertix used alot of OpenBSD code in SFU, and they say it runs natively rather than through a system call emulator. However, there are not as many UNIX utilities available for SFU as for cygwin. Some additional tools are available in the Tool Warehouse

      Everything supports save as PDF through printing interface. No need to use Acrobat.

      I love being able to save anything to PDF, but it bugs me that Preview doesn't seem to let you fill in PDF forms. Also, you can't edit PDFs in Preview; but hey, I guess it's "free".

      --
      I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
    6. Re:The petty annoyances by trendyhendy · · Score: 1

      Table support is new in the Tiger version.

  88. Re:It is viruses by TyrionEagle · · Score: 1
    Wikipedia defines Virii as "frequently perceived to be founded on a misunderstanding of Latin plurals such as radii". Also the following should help.

    The word virus never had a plural form in Latin. In antiquity the word had not yet acquired its current meaning. It denoted something like toxicity; venom; a poisonous, deleterious, or unpleasant agent or principle; or poison in the abstract or general sense. Nouns denoting countable entities (e.g. book) pluralize; noncountable entities (e.g. air, mood, valor) pluralize only under special circumstances. The term virus in antiquity appears to have belonged to the latter category, hence the nonexistence of plural forms. [June 1999 issue of ASM News by the American Society for Microbiology]
    --
    -- I like the cut of your thinking, young man. - me.
  89. I would start recommending them today by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Beige box for slightly less than the price of an x86 whitebox, that runs Linux just fine and can never run MS-Windows nor x86 exploits.

    Hmm.

    This is too good to be true. Where's the catch?

    Probably here: Apple can see no profitable reason to do it. I'll bet that a substantial number of Mac Minis now run Linux, and that if Apple dropped the price of an entry-level machine even further by selling a non-tiny one, they might wind up in the embarrassing situation of having more Macs running Linux than OS X. Never mind having t0t4l 0\/\/n3r5h!p of the desktop hardware market, we're gonna dummy-spit on 3... 2... 1...

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  90. You're absolutely right by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Automator is also the one I'm waiting for.
    Speaking of pipes, did you notice that the automator is actually holding a pipe?
    Nobody is mentioning the new H.264 codec either, which is gonna do wonders for pr0n.
    And then, of course, speaking of pr0n, can you imagine the possibilites with virtual folders?
    But I'm getting ahead of myself.
    Can't wait for my copy to arrive tomorrow!

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:You're absolutely right by Colol · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Automator icon's always kinda freaked me out since Apple released it to the features page. Maybe it's just me, but it looks like the roboto's going to flip out any moment and whack someone with that pipe. I can see him smacking it against his hand as he walks down the street looking for trouble.

      Back to the other topic at hand, Automator is very cool. Sure, you could accomplish almost everything it does with AppleScript, but this is certainly a better general audience approach. Once developers start writing their own Automator actions, then we'll really see utility take off.

  91. The trouble with Tiger by acomj · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Don't get me wrong, Tiger seems like a great operating upgrade. I think its a little steep at 130$ but probably worth it.
    My problem with it is that it fragments the new mac users more than 10.3 did. Here is why.

    They give the developer new tools/frameworks for easier better application development. These are great. HOWEVER, if you a developer choose to use those new features your software ONLY works on 10.4 (tiger) not on 10.3. core data for example
    . Also it looks like apple won't make java 1.5 work on older versions of the mac OS, meaning they won't work on older versions the the OS either. This further fragmenting apples small market share, adding frustration to developers and software purchasers alike. You have to code with the older frameworks or compel your users to update. This is a not required but "strongly compelled upgrade"

    1. Re:The trouble with Tiger by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      You can, of course, elect NOT to use those features.

      Newer versions of the OS employing new technology is not a new thing. I still remember the Holy war between 68k and PowerPC. I remember the hubub over the introduction of OpenTransport. And the Jihad that was the move to OS/X, then 10.2, then 10.3.

      Frankly, Mac users are more flexible than you give them credit.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:The trouble with Tiger by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When we rolled out Panther, there were many new features that would only work in 10.3. I think it took about three months for developers to start using those features with confidence.

      And the momentum behind Tiger is considerably higher than it was behind the previous release.

      Expect adoption of Tiger to happen very quickly.

  92. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    Why are you comparing a dual 2.3GHz G5 to a dual 1.8GHz Opteron? These architectures, at least compared to a P4, are far more similar than dissimilar.

    How much is a dual 2.2GHz Opteron? Or a 2.4GHz Opteron?

    Where can you find such a good deal on such an Opteron?

  93. I agree an easy symlink tool would be interesting by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really like Spotlight, and I have to say that counter to your assessment that something needs to be built that will make things easier to organize that there are a lot of people that will never care and just dump documents somewhere.

    However I do agree that for those that seek a cleaner path, a tool that made the creation of symlinks much easier for normal people would be cool. To some extent Smart Folders in spotlight and other systems fill this role in that a smart folder is sort of like getting a directory with links to all of the files from one subject. But I think you might end up with results not quite exactly what you want at times - like too many files or perhaps missing a few. So a tool that let you build a set of symlinks using spotlight as a base might be pretty interesting and has the possibility of eliminating the need for photo management apps for many people.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  94. Re:But which karma whore is the parent's originato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the earlier post.

  95. why i switched by k2enemy · · Score: 1

    i just ordered a 15" powerbook, which will be my first mac (although i use them quite often away from home). aside from the usual benefits like "it just works", my main reason for switching is bsd.

    for the past ten years, i've always used two computers, one with windows for a productive work environment + compatability and another with linux for programming and fun.

    now with an apple on the way, i hope to get both of those in one machine.

  96. Re:Looking forward to Automator, Dashboard, and iC by amichalo · · Score: 1

    Just a note about iChat AV and its ability to do a 4 person chat. They don't advertise this, but apparently you need a G5 to initiate the chats. If your Mac is anything less, like a notebook or the Mini, you're S.O.L.

    How do you know this? Is there a webpage you can point me to? I have a PowerBook so this is disturbing to read.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  97. Re:It is viruses by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Well, there are lots of people who believe in gods and evil spirits. The bottom line being that what you believe, isn't related to reality. Belief and truth are not the same thing. Actually, belief pretty much means that something is not true. Viri is a Latin word, you can go look it up yourself.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  98. apple and engineers just don't mix by augiAUDIO · · Score: 0

    I'm an engineer with degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering. The problem with Macs is that they're not friendly to the scientific community. Essential programs like AutoCAD, most finite element programs and circuit simulation programs are just not available to Macs. Thats why no one in the engineering field gives Macs much attention.

  99. Interface for the blind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the more important things in Tiger is that it has an interface for the blind (VoiceOver) built into the OS.

    Now at first you might think "so what" but consider this. To get a voiced interface in Windows that the blind can use you must buy one of two add on products WindowEyes or Jaws. The retail price for either of these products is $850.00 for Jaws and $760.00 wor WindowEyes (WindowEyes will breaks under WindowsXP SP2.)

    So consider this, for less that the price of either one of these products, and I've used both and neither one is a good as Apple's built in solution, you could BUY a new MacMini and get the screen reader built in. That's right folk you could get a NEW COMPUTER and the screenreader for less than the cost of the screenreading software alone under windows.

    I predict here and now that Microsoft will buy one of the two screen readers for windows and bundle it with Windows. The makers other screen reader will promptly go out of business.

    1. Re:Interface for the blind by gkearney · · Score: 1

      Good points.

    2. Re:Interface for the blind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod the AC up.
      (and, i'm a different AC, btw)

      iirc, Apple actually did a survey for Voice Over about a year or so ago.

      Since OS X debuted there have been basic tech for visually impaired built in. Most of it was pretty much an extension of what existed in the Classic OS. But, for VoiceOver, vs what shipped with Jaguar and Panther, Apple does have a good solution worth talking up.

      I remember finding out about the prices of screen readers years back and thought that they were robbing the blind. But, I guess the market is small and perhaps the prices are justifiabie for Windows users.
      Now there's options.

  100. Re:Greatest Invention in the History of Mankind Ev by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    It sounds like he ran the article through the new hyperbolic chamber.

    Is that where you can do a whole year's worth of product testing in a single day?

    Nah, never mind. Who wants to employ a reviewer who turns into King Kong at full moons?

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  101. Steve Jobs Quote.... by kajoob · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jobs quoted in TODAY's WSJ...

    Market share is "a lot less important than it once was," Mr. Jobs says. "I'm not sure it matters."

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
  102. You forgot Poland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...er...Multics. Multics was the first to have hierarchial directories. Of course, if you strictly use the name "folder," then Mac was the first, but since a folder is just a silly name for a directory, Multics, the Great-Great-Great-Grandfather of Mac OS X, was the first.

    1. Re:You forgot Poland by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      Multics was the first to have hierarchial directories.

      +5, Informative. For those curious about Multics, see multicians.org.

  103. Hate to point out that... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...Apache, OpenSSHd and PostgreSQL all run just fine on XP Home. $0 each, simple to install and configure.

    A Mac Mini RRPs for about AUD$799 here sans screen and with OS X bundled. I'll ring them tomorrow and find out if and how much for one without OS X. I can build a near-equivalent x86 whitebox (40GB HDD, 256MB RAM) for about AUD$450. If I could buy a naked PowerPC box of any physical size from Apple for about $550, I would be recommending them to customers like there was no tomorrow. Runs Linux but not x86 cracks, doesn't run Windows. Paradise.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Hate to point out that... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      The point is that you have to INSTALL it.

      It takes 3+ hours to configure XP out of the box into a workable OS.

      It takes me about 1 hour for a Mac. Download MySQL, Eclipse, updates, configure apache and I'm running.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    2. Re:Hate to point out that... by juiceCake · · Score: 1

      Mileage obviously varies. The same amount of time you list of OS X is the same amount of time for XP for me.

    3. Re:Hate to point out that... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      I hate to point out that XP Home is crippled compared to OS X when dealing with MSFT Servers in a networked environment. Panther and Tiger support participation in an Active Directory or NT domain whereas XP home does not. Panther and Tiger support Home folder encryption whereas XP does not. OS X has more user levels than XP Home.

      You seem to think that OS X is the equivalent of the Home edition of XP and yet the CIA and NSA would disagree with you.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    4. Re:Hate to point out that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to download MySQL on OS X. PostgreSQL is already installed and waiting there for you. :)

      (cue the Postgres vs. MySQL flamewar...)

    5. Re:Hate to point out that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "....Apache, OpenSSHd and PostgreSQL all run just fine on XP Home..."

      But it is a violation of Mircosofts EULA to have more than 10 people connect to your box concurrently with XP home/Pro version. Not a problem at home but at the office or web hosting... buck up. Or use a none control-freak OS.

  104. Re:Anybody compiled it for the PC yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "$129 is still too expensive for the average home user to consider"

    I forked over $199 for a family pack so I can upgrade five of my Macs to 10.4 (the others are "classic" Macs running OS 7-9). And I'll still keep my XP machine mostly blocked from the Internet to keep crap off my network.

  105. Amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the money burning a hole in my pocket. But its not burning so hot that I'll buy a G4 with a 167mhz FSB for $2,500. Particularly when I can get a roughly equal notebook for significantly less from several other vendors.

    I keep tell the apple fanboys that the Powerbook lineup is old and CREAKY at this point, but they all say the same thing "Its fast enough for me". As if that help.

  106. Do you live somewhere with weather? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Ok, that was a little smarmy but...

    I already tried gdesklets and I just do NOT need to have a widget telling me the weather, I've windows in my house, thanks.

    Well I live in Colorado and the weather is something to be aware of even if you have a window - if you're going on a trip longer than fifteen minutes it's helpful to have an idea of the weather when you go out. Like yesterday when it was sunny and warm out and then BOOM - spring blizzard.

    Also the weather is handy to have easily at hand when planning things like dinners or nights to go out.

    So the weather is one of the first things going my my Dashboard! That and a calculator and a simple calendar.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  107. Re:But which karma whore is the parent's originato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well done, thats the very first post. If Mr "You're just a cut & paste" up there would care to check, he'll notice there are spelling and grammer corrections in later versions. That's because I keep it upto date.

    Why yes though, I do use Mandrake. Before that, I used Redhat. Both work about as well as any other Linux distribution I.e. not very well. Your point?

  108. Too bad CISCO VPN does not work with it by Danathar · · Score: 1

    Evidentally there is enough of "under the hood" changes to the kernel network API's that CISCO's VPN client is incompatible. CISCO is working on it reportedly but it will not be out before the end of May. This is a MAJOR show stopper for Tiger deployment where I work.

    1. Re:Too bad CISCO VPN does not work with it by lmsig · · Score: 1

      yea, but do you really need it the day it comes out where you work? The end of may is not that far away.

      --
      .plan!! what plan?
    2. Re:Too bad CISCO VPN does not work with it by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Oh I can wait....it's just fustrating that beta versions of Tiger have been out long enough that they (CISCO) should have it done by now (in my opinion)

    3. Re:Too bad CISCO VPN does not work with it by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Evidentally there is enough of "under the hood" changes to the kernel network API's that CISCO's VPN client is incompatible. CISCO is working on it reportedly but it will not be out before the end of May. This is a MAJOR show stopper for Tiger deployment where I work.

      Hmm, that is odd. Look at this blurb from the Tiger features pages, "Mac OS X Tiger includes a built-in VPN client that supports the Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol over Internet Protocol Security (L2TP/IPSec) and Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP), and is compatible with most popular VPN servers, including those from Cisco and Microsoft."

      Have you tried the built in VPN features in Tiger? I was hoping I could ditch the Cisco VPN client altogether.

    4. Re:Too bad CISCO VPN does not work with it by Danathar · · Score: 1

      You can if you are not using group authentication. Many shops use CISCO with group authentication enabled. The Tiger VPN does not support that.

    5. Re:Too bad CISCO VPN does not work with it by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. Looks like I may not be upgrading for a while. Note, there is a thread on MacSlash that says the Cisco VPN client breaks with the install, but works if you re-install it. You may want to give that a try if you have a machine you are testing with. Unfortunately I have only this one production laptop that can get to the VPN server so I'll wait till someone else gives it a shot. Thanks again.

  109. Mac Viruii, spyware, etc by TheLogster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The reason that there is so little malware for the mac - is beacuse very few people are writing mainstream applications for the OS.

    Windows is still Industry Standard - and all you mac and linux zealots can do nothing to change it (well - not just yet anyway :)

    At the moment, you can't go into PCworld, Game, Staples, etc and buy "Joe's Recipe Database" for *nix (linux or OSX). For the foreseeable future, the world is running Windows.

    It is just one of those things. However, one day Micosoft will make a mistake, and they _will_ lose their domanace over the PC industry. I think it will happen when there is a completly new kind of hardware that is taken up.

    My $0.02

    TheLogster

    1. Re:Mac Viruii, spyware, etc by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1
      "For the foreseeable future, the world is running Windows."

      Hey, it's their funeral...

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    2. Re:Mac Viruii, spyware, etc by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      The reason that there is so little malware for the mac - is beacuse very few people are writing mainstream applications for the OS.

      *shrug*
      So? I don't care why it is, I just care that I don't have to worry about any of that shit. I actually *hope* that mac's market share doesn't go above about 10% so that people aren't inspired to write malware for it.

      At the moment, you can't go into PCworld, Game, Staples, etc and buy "Joe's Recipe Database" for *nix (linux or OSX).

      *shrugs again*
      So far, I've been able to get all the apps I've needed either from Apple or download.com. My inability to buy software and places I don't really think to buy software from in the first place hasn't hurt me.

      Did you have a point?

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    3. Re:Mac Viruii, spyware, etc by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      The reason that there is so little malware for the mac - is beacuse very few people are writing mainstream applications for the OS.

      And the reason the Big Bad Wolf couldn't blow down the brick house was because so few pigs used brick houses. They weren't stronger; surely the wolf could have blown it down if he put his mind to it.

      In other words, your two cents are worthless. An item's popularity has no direct relation to its capabilities. There are quite a few virus writers who would love to be the first to write an actual destructive Mac virus. The fact is, there just aren't enough vulnerabilities for them to do so.

      And why the hell would anyone buy "Joe's Recipe Database"? It's buggy, crashes if you also have "Jill's Doll Database" installed, uses non-standard shortcuts, and requires you to run in admin mode.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    4. Re:Mac Viruii, spyware, etc by bemenaker · · Score: 1

      bring bring, clue phone, its for you security through obscurity != security, never has, never will. gee maybe that is why apple made the jackass who put up the big "bet you can't write a virus" contest a couple months ago take it down the next day.

  110. it's cool for pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check it out.... however it's still a little buggy when doing 2 level crawling... mmh... pr0n.

  111. Re:Sure... by Astatine · · Score: 1

    Offtopic! Irrelevant!

    Linus doesn't use OS X! He uses a Power Mac because they're well built (if expensive) workstations and he felt it was important to have a core developer running on non-x86 hardware...

  112. Jesus called again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He told me he's sorry he created people like you who consistently miss the point. he said he felt bad creating now in hindsight, because everybody calls you "asshat" behind your back. Women think you're creepy, and if you manage to breed, your kids will run away from home by the time they're 9.

    He said he'll make it up by never screwing up so badly before. But he said on the plus side, you're good training for him to throw lighting bolts at.

    1. Re:Jesus called again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you're good training for him to throw lighting bolts at.

      You seem to have your God confused with someone elses. Unless Thor rely is Jesus, which would at least make Christianity slightly interesting.

    2. Re:Jesus called again by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's Zeus who is best known for throwing lightning bolts. Thor was the God of thunder (and lightning?) but he relied more on physical strength and a few magical items to win his battles.

  113. Re:can it run doom 3? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Umm....

    No?

    BZZT! Bad troll, no cookie!

    There's plenty of games in OSX, even newer ones like WoW. There's just no great GPUs because Apple is retarded when it comes to GPUs.

  114. Re:Correcting people anonymously by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 1

    Makes you look like an idiot!

    A) You're so anal & smug that you feel the need to correct someone's innocent mistake, making sure to insult them in the process
    B) And you're realistic enough to know that doing this is not going to make you popular with the /. readers, so you make your post anonymous.

    What's worse? A guy who mistypes a word, while making an otherwise legit post, or someone who feels the need to show their superiority by correcting them, all the while knowing that to do so is both uncool, and a waste of everyones time?

  115. How do you know what is barely used? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The plethora of Mac's gee-whiz features (dashboard, rendezvous, expose, neato startup modes) that barely get used are becoming less and less valuable to me as the Apple hardware continues to lag behind.

    I think that's an unfair statement unless you use a Mac day to day. Some of them look like eye candy but really are not. Rondevouz really is useful if you have two or more computers. I use Expose pretty heavily as it's a great productivity tool. And while I do not yet have dashboard I know how often I turn to the calculator or calendar to know I'll find it handy.

    And while yes you can get a slower older no-name computer for less and put Linux on it so it's usable, it's still a lot of bother. I ran Linux for a long time as well, and still do at work (on one of two computers) where it's either that or Windows. But I really enjoy not having to spend time fiddling with a computer at home and just working on it, that's what Macs excel at.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:How do you know what is barely used? by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      And while yes you can get a slower older no-name computer for less and put Linux on it so it's usable, it's still a lot of bother. I ran Linux for a long time as well, and still do at work (on one of two computers) where it's either that or Windows. But I really enjoy not having to spend time fiddling with a computer at home and just working on it, that's what Macs excel at.

      Amen, brother. That is why I prefer using my Powerbook running 10.3 to my Linux/WinXP desktop. When I don't feel like fighting with my computer to get it to do what I want, I open the lid of the laptop, enter my password (I set it to require a password when waking up) and go. I found when I switched to using a Mac as my main computer that my computing experience changed so now I tell the computer what I want it to do, rather than it telling me what it is going to do. The computer seems to be more an extension of my mind rather than a set of obstacles that I have to overcome to get something done.

  116. Apple upgrades *are* free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I would prefer they just give us every upgrade for free!! "

    They do. I get my free upgrades at that new store... Bit Torrent's or something like that.

  117. But David Pogue says it's ok... by mgibbs · · Score: 1
    My favorite line from the NYT Pogue article:
    A five-Mac license is available for $150 after Amazon rebate, too, although it's worth noting that Mac OS X is not copy-protected and requires no Windows-style activation.

    In other words, feel free to borrow that Tiger CD from your friend and install it on your Mac. If anyone mentions it, just tell them David Pogue said it's ok.

  118. Re:Correcting people anonymously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha, ha.

    Your mom's a whore.

  119. Many fundamental API's introduced by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    CoreImage, CoredData, and Spotlight (the API) are the things you're getting under the covers which are going to make a lot of interesting apps possible.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  120. yes it does run doom3, no hl2 sucks anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks for reading

  121. Holding out for OS 10.9.8 Liger by CaseOfThaMondays · · Score: 5, Funny

    Liger is going to pretty much be my favorite OS. its bred for its skills in stability and magic.

    --
    thats pretty much my best post ever. I spent like 3 hours typing it.
    1. Re:Holding out for OS 10.9.8 Liger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Liger is going to pretty much be my favorite OS. its bred for its skills in stability and magic. "

      funniest comment eva!

  122. Re:IPod hardware quality by nexus987 · · Score: 1

    I dunno. I love my ipod, but it's been in the shop 3 times now. According to the last tech who I talked to (and a few end users who I've met), a LOT of people are having hardware problems with their iPods. I've also heard some friends complaining that their powerbooks have had hardware problems. I'm beginning to suspect that, while their software is really good, their hardware is low-quality stuff made overseas...

  123. Re:can it run doom 3? by thesman · · Score: 2, Informative

    So... you didn't knew there was Doom 3 for Mac?

    Watch out, they're cathing up...

  124. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comparing process clock cycles between x86 chips and powerpc chips is a meaningless exercise. It's how much gets done during each cycle that's important. Much harder to casually measure, so use the machines you are interested in and see how you like their responsiveness in the tasks you like to do.

    Go to the Apple store, play with a computer in your price range. Edit some photos, browse the web, launch some apps, mess around. And then do the same on a comparable system at (Best Buy, Fry's, etc) and see what you think.

    Or go to CompUSA and hit both in one store.

  125. too bad there isn't a .. by torpor · · Score: 1

    Fedex-Tracker Dashboard Widget ..

    Yet.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:too bad there isn't a .. by chiro · · Score: 1
    2. Re:too bad there isn't a .. by stripes · · Score: 1

      There is a FedEx Tracker dashboard widget already. Probably more then one even. No minesweeper that I've been able to find yet.

  126. Beagle/Desklets by WorLord · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is it just me, or do the two most-hyped new applications in Tiger (Dashboard and Spotlight) bear a striking resemblance to two Linux apps that I've been using for some time already (Desklets and Beagle)?

  127. Re:Looking forward to Automator, Dashboard, and iC by dr00g911 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Automator is *really* cool for a 1.0 app.

    On my first demo of it, I created a desktop 'droplet' icon that allows account execs at my shop to drop a job order or update document on an icon, it creates a new email, summarizes the file in the body, attaches the file, sends it to the appropriate people with the correct job number in the subject line, and files it in the sent mail archive specific to which client the job number refers to.

    I did this in three minutes flat on the first day I played with it.

    There's a ton of reliance still on using shell script glue if you're doing super complex stuff, but once more actions (like applescript dictionaries) are available for common apps right in the automator window, people are going to start creating some amazing stuff.

  128. dyslexic names don't matter by so1omon · · Score: 1

    fortunately, yes it will...

    --
    i'm the jedidiahmarkfoster your parents warned you about
  129. Are you stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've windows in my house, thanks

    I hate to have to point out the obvious and I don't make the claim that Dashboard is a tool you need, but do you understand the difference between looking out your fucking window and a weather FORECAST? Unless you're Karnack, you might want to know that showers are expected in the late afternoon. Weather forecasts are different than the current weather.

  130. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by Halo1 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I've seen Tiger on a 1.42 Mac Mini with 512MB RAM. The only thing that worried me is that each instance of a widget in Dashboard took 5-10MB of real memory
    How much of that is shared?
    and about 100MB of virtual memory.
    A default command line program under Panther uses 27MB of virtual memory (including an 8MB stack). A simply GUI app uses 200MB. But I think you are confused due to the connotation that "virtual memory" has under Windows and had under Mac OS classic.

    Virtual memory does not mean "swapped out" memory. It simply means "allocated memory space". As long as you do not actually use this memory, it's free for other programs to use, will not cause any swapping and does not consume any RAM whatsoever.

    use vmmap <pid> to get the memory map of an actual application. At the end, you'll get something like

    ReadOnly portion of Libraries: Total=3252KB resident=3212KB(99%) swapped_out_or_unallocated=40KB(1%)
    Writable regions: Total=17672KB written=8KB(0%) resident=104KB(1%) swapped_out=0KB(0%) unallocated=17568KB(99%)
    All ReadOnly portions can be shared with other applications.
    --
    Donate free food here
  131. too bad the piece of shit won't run on Intel PC's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too bad the piece of shit won't run on Intel PC's...

    too bad i'm a piece of shit, and can't afford Apple hardware...

  132. Spotlight seems not so new either by drhamad · · Score: 1

    After reading the Pogue article (one of my favorite writers), and seeing him mention that Dashboard is like Konfabulator, I must ask this (not having yet used Tiger): Isn't Spotlight pretty much like Launchbar? http://www.obdev.at/products/launchbar/ I'm not saying exactly, but just like Spotlight, LB you type your hotkeys (cmd-space, in my case, just like Spotlight), and just start typing and it'll bring up any file on the hd, any program, any mp3 or document, etc. It doesn't do searching inside of docs though, that's true.

    --
    -Daniel
    1. Re:Spotlight seems not so new either by rokzy · · Score: 1

      >It doesn't do searching inside of docs though, that's true.

      then yes, Spotlight is pretty much like Launchbar. in the same way that Google is pretty much like an old yahoo portal.

    2. Re:Spotlight seems not so new either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LaunchBar can't find metadata.

  133. Aging Panther Installs will Break Tiger Upgrades by Yocto+Yotta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have an 1ghz iBook G4 that I had done a clean install of Panther a month ago and installed Tiger directly over the top when I received it yesterday. It works beautifully. My roomate has a 1.2ghz Powerbook that's Panther installation dates back to the reciept of the machine over a year and half ago, and Tiger runs like shit on it. It broke everything. Connecting Firewire devices gives him Apple's Screen of Death (I didn't know it even existed . . . the screen goes black and white and says shit in a whole bunch of languages), Expose is broke, his widgets don't work, Spotlight is slow as hell, networking busted . . . wiping his drive and reinstalling clean fixed all of this. Just something to keep in mind.

    --
    A B A C A B B
  134. The best OS... by Bullfish · · Score: 1

    few will ever see, let alone use Why is that?

    1. Re:The best OS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they're mindless sheep who just buy what everyone else uses.

      Because they're stupid, cheap, short-sighted dumbfucks, who can't see that a $300 PC that needs constant maintenance and needs to be replaced in about two years is not a better deal than a $500 Mac that needs signficantly less maintenance and won't really start to show its age until it's at least four or five years old.

      Or hardcore gamers who need the latest lame, cookie-cutter FPS the day it's released.

    2. Re:The best OS... by Bullfish · · Score: 1

      I was hoping for something more substantial than a bitter rant

    3. Re:The best OS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      won't really start to show its age until it's at least four or five years old

      Funny, like other Apple products, that no screen laptop was showing its age the day it was released.

      I can see why someone would believe they don't show any signs of age for 4-5 years, no one really releases anything for it and they are already use to the sluggyness of Apple's machines.

  135. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The virtual memory indicator under OSX includes all mapped files and shared libraries. So large portions of that 100MB are shared between the different widgets ( and probablyu safari too ) but are reported multiple times because they are mapped to many virtual addresses ( Even though they only take up the same amount of actual space plus a tiny amount of overhead ).

  136. I'm on a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    using Safari with ads blocked, and I didn't see the M$ junk. wanna switch?

    1. Re:I'm on a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be a stupid reason intself considering that I have the ads blocked using IE on windows.

      If this guy hasn't figured out how to block ads regardless of what OS/Browser he's using, then switching OS and broswer will hardly make a difference.

  137. ACL support? by koehn · · Score: 1

    Anybody know how to use the ACL stuff on an HFS+ volume? I tried 'chmod a+ "foo allow write" bar', but all I get is "Operation not supported". ACLs are a big deal, but not if they're not supported on the standard file system. Do I need to switch to UFS or HFS+ Case-Sensitive?

    1. Re:ACL support? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Ars says:

      For ACLs to work at all, they must be enabled for a particular volume. The Workgroup Manager application in Mac OS X 10.4 Server can do this, but that application is not included with the normal (non-server) version of Tiger. There is a command-line work-around, however. This command will enable ACLs on the boot volume.

      % sudo /usr/sbin/fsaclctl -p / -e

  138. A rave review from Mossberg??? how surprising... by NeedleSurfer · · Score: 1

    No honestly, Tiger will be all good when I get it, I'm sure, and I really like my Mac, but sincerly is that breaking news? Walt Mossberg raving on the Mac, or anything Apple? He is the Turrot of Mac, that's not a big news...

  139. Not the same by clickster · · Score: 1

    Automater is far easier to use than what you're linking to. Automater is accessible to the general user. DCOP requires significantly more computer experience. Still, I didn't know DCOP was there. I'll have to check it out.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  140. Definitely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Definite" means that something has a limit or end, similar to "finite" or "finish." If you can remember what in means to finish something, you can spell "definitely" correctly every time.

  141. Sleeper hit feature - parental controls by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    From reading both stories it seems like a sleeper hit feature with the mass market might be the parental controls it offers. Since you can give your kid a seperate account you can also use that account to specify which web sites they can browse, forward all emails from them to you, limit who they can send emails to and have an email go to you first for aprpoval before it is transmitted if they are not on the list.

    This feature was mentioned in both stores and I had not even noticed it before. But they sure seemed to be impressed by it, enough to mention it right alongside the major new features like spotlight or dashboard.

    Personally I am a little creeeped out but the thought of parents exceting this much control over kids lives - I don't have kids but I'd like to imagine I would allow them more freedom than this. But parents are doing this kind of stuff anyway and I suppose on the plus side for kids parents will never notice when these features have been circumvented or they start talking in code. And any feature that drives kids to be more crafty has to be good as far as I'm concerned... :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Sleeper hit feature - parental controls by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hmmm... do you have kids? From your comments I doubt it. Let me tell you, as the father of 5 yr old twins it is a scary world out there. Much different than when I grew up. There are a bunch of bad people out there that would love to do my kids harm, both online and in the physcial world. It is my responsibility to protect them, but also temper that so as not to be over protective. I appreciate all the help vendors can give, so I can decide what to do. Not the government, not you, but me and my wife.

      On a lighter note... my Tiger shipment is on the FedEx truck for delivery today. Woohoo!

    2. Re:Sleeper hit feature - parental controls by rokzy · · Score: 1

      > Hmmm... do you have kids? From your comments I doubt it.

      wow, nothing gets past you does it?

      he said, "I don't have kids..."

      you either live in a real shit hole or have been watching too much TV... "YOUR KIDS MIGHT DIE ON THE INTERNET, we'll tell you why afer the break..."

    3. Re:Sleeper hit feature - parental controls by strikethree · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I do have kids and I can guarantee you that the world is not any more dangerous than it was 50 years ago, 500 years or even 5000 thousand years ago... except kids are less likely to be eaten by wild animals now. I always hear people saying, "kids nowadays! they are so much more X than when I was their age." or, "Things have changed so much from when I was a kid." Let me clue you in buddy. Sure, there are cycles where things are a little more this or a little more that (or a little less!) but for the most part, people are not changing. The internet did not suddenly create a bunch of sick people hunting down your child. Those people were always there. The internet did not create a whole new class of racists/paedophiles/[insert other dangerous scary type person here].

      It is always the same old song and dance. The more things change, the more things stay the same.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    4. Re:Sleeper hit feature - parental controls by Kludge · · Score: 1

      Parent post is right. The world is not much more dangerous than 50 years ago. For example, NYC recently had the lowest murder rate in more than a century. People who read/watch news have an extremely skewed view of the world. Your kids are far more likely to die in a car accident than by any other means. If you really care about them, don't put them in a car.

    5. Re:Sleeper hit feature - parental controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about the terrorists. Millions of them. They'lll eat you in your sleep! Best to kill them now! Please! GET GUNS! Hide in the BASSMENT! THERE IS TIME! YOU wnat TO! KILL!

  142. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by popeyethesailor · · Score: 1
    Dude, E17 has come a long way. Have a look at E17 snapshots.

    Also checkout Raster's site.

    Can you imagine a graphics system that runs on PDAs, your computer from 1999, and your shiny new boxes? E17 is just f'ing brilliant.

  143. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    Odd post.

    You seem smart enough, but you mention waiting for a G5 PowerBook for two years. Even those with a cursory knowledge of the Mac world realise that your first year was massively, rose-coloured-glasses optimistic, and your second year was not going to shape up well either.

    So... you didn't use a computer for those two years..? Or were you waiting for a G5 PowerBook at an iBook price and you're unhappy that Apple have failed you in this?

    You also just don't understand memory handling. There's another post with the answer, but really, why would you bring Windows memory handling knowledge into the world of Unix and expect things to make sense?

    Your post seems to boil down to the usual "I want a top Mac for under $200 and if Apple don't make it, they're a complete rip-off." Your system seems to be ideal for you - powerful at an insanely low price. If it does what you want, then you're out on top and good luck to you.

    For my part, I'm happy on my little iBook that does everything I need it to, cost me very little and actually runs better after each major OS X release (as they further optimise for G4/G5 and reduce G3 and earlier code).

  144. Price Point by Rihahn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I keep seeing all of these posts where someone mentions they can get a PC with 'X' ram, 'X' HD, 'X' CPU for 'X' cheaper than a Mac... You can also go buy a $1000 Honda and add all sorts of ground effects, spoilers, lights, and other 'performance' mods and have a pretty quick little car that will beat a BMW 740il soundly... But it's still a Honda. And unless you're stupid, you'll wind up going down the road at the exact same speed as that Beemer. The only difference is that you added all of that stuff to your car, you know every rattle and squeak, tolerate the lousy ride because you can corner like no ones business, have bass that can make your neighbors evaporate, and you can fix any of it easily or upgrade it... Meanwhile the guy with the Beemer has a 10-year warrantee that covers tears in the upholstery and doesn't have to think about the car, he just drives it. He gets to spend his weekends out playing with his kids rather than tweaking a new intake manifold, can drive the car from Denver to L.A. without worrying about the radiator being two sizes too small for the type-R motor that has been shoehorned into the car, and his stock sound system is pretty nice because he doesn't need 3000 watts to overcome the #10 coffee can exhaust system. Of course the average /.'er drives a VW Thing that was hand built by everyone he/she knows, only runs on methanol that he/she makes in the back yard, has the steering wheel on the wrong side, and requires three keys to start. ;)

    1. Re:Price Point by js3 · · Score: 1

      10 year warranty on a computer? Who the hell needs that. I'll take the honda thank you.

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    2. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wonder about these Slashdotters with their "I can put one together cheaper or get one cheaper from Dell" arguments.

      Are all Slashdotters driving around in Hyundais or hand-tuned 1970's Chevys?

      Why is it that a guy will freak out over paying a few hundred more for a Mac, then you find out he quite willingly paid an extra $20,000 for that unnecessarily large and expensive to maintain, fuel, and insure SUV he's got parked in the driveway? It doesn't make any sense.

    3. Re:Price Point by omahajim · · Score: 1
      Of course the average /.'er drives a VW Thing that was hand built by everyone he/she knows, only runs on methanol that he/she makes in the back yard,

      I think the people driving VW Golf/TDI's are running Biodiesel.

    4. Re:Price Point by Rihahn · · Score: 1

      Well, the SUV is there because the .gov will litterally pay you to own it if it's for 'business' and weighs over 6600 pounds. Around the studio here we have everything from *Hard Core* SGI/Sun guys (the types who think using an OS should be like freeclimbing El Capitan) to Mac using artists who seem to think a keyboard is only for Photoshop shortcuts, all the way to the Dell-using financial folks who pinch pennies till they scream. It's all about what you want to do with the hardware.

    5. Re:Price Point by rnelsonee · · Score: 1

      The poster wasn't suggesting a warranty for a computer. The warranty comment was part of the car analogy. An analogous feature for a computer would be the long-term security and performance: with Windows, you need to antivirus patches, upgrade firewalls... etc. more often (and with more effort) than with OS X. I've never had a Windows OS last more than three years without a need for a reinstall, whereas OS X might last longer (I wouldn't know, I've only had a Mac for a month). Either way, it's a valid point.

    6. Re:Price Point by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Nice summary.

      Except for the VW part. I love my Jetta. I tend to think that VWs and Apples have very similar corporate values (or at least marketing tactics). I was one of the first people to have a new Jetta (5 years ago), and it was a great feeling of being "different". Now, however, everywhere you look you see them.

      In some ways, I'd almost prefer that Mac's remain less popular and more elite.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    7. Re:Price Point by idsofmarch · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points that was funny as hell.

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    8. Re:Price Point by FredFnord · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, the guy with the Honda has a car that pretty much spanks the repair record of the BMW so badly that the Honda probably won't go into the shop more than once in those entire first ten years anyway, whereas the BMW will spend, over those same ten years, three dozen times as much time in the shop.

      Hondas (and Acuras) kick ass. Mine is 9 years old, and the only problem I've had with it was a manufacturing defect in the driver's seat.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    9. Re:Price Point by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I own both a Mac and a Hyundai, and for the same reason: they're both more efficient and reliable than the alternatives (a Windows or Linux PC and a used car, respectively).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    10. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you've fucked around with it that much. You're more likeley to have a heavily modded honda blow up than a stock BMW.

    11. Re:Price Point by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Actually, Toyotas and Hyundais are both more reliable than Hondas (or BMWs) these days.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:Price Point by garote · · Score: 1

      Gnahahaa, the way you describe it, it sounds more like it's all about "What you want the hardware to do to you." :)

    13. Re:Price Point by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      "...the only problem I've had with it was a manufacturing defect in the driver's seat."

      Dude, humility is good, but you really shouldn't put yourself down like that...

      (Sorry, it was too good to pass up).

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    14. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell is the parent post insightful? I could buy a top of the line PC and it would whoop the shit out of a top of the line Mac and cost half as much.

    15. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the fact of the matter is that the parts that are cheaper for an x86 machine are primarily cheaper because of competition, not because of some difference in quality. So, quite simply, your analogy doesn't work.

    16. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own both a Mac (okay, three macs, but one of them is my daughters) and a VW thing (type 181). The Macs work great. The VW thing is a project that will never run even as well as a Suzuki Samurai.

    17. Re:Price Point by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      *snrk* God, I wish I'd thought of that before I posted it.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  145. No Entourage? No thanks. by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    I was strongly considering upgrading from Panther to Tiger just for the spotlight feature - finding things is always a chore (although still not as bad as the Windows "Find file " feature which i can start a search, go to lunch, come back, and it is still not finished). But, with 1000s of emails (many containing vital information) in Entourage, and that program not currently supported by the new search feature, there is nothing for me to do but wait.

    1. Re:No Entourage? No thanks. by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's Mac Business Unit said a couple weeks ago that they were going to release an update to Office 2004 "this summer" that will take advantage of new features in Tiger. I don't recall opening up the Entourage database to Spotlight searches being specifically mentioned-- only time will tell.

      ~Philly

    2. Re:No Entourage? No thanks. by yabos · · Score: 1

      Uhh Apple doesn't make Entourage. MS does. It's their responsibility to make a Spotlight plugin to work with their apps.

    3. Re:No Entourage? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was strongly considering upgrading from Panther to Tiger just for the spotlight feature - finding things is always a chore (although still not as bad as the Windows "Find file " feature which i can start a search, go to lunch, come back, and it is still not finished). But, with 1000s of emails (many containing vital information) in Entourage, and that program not currently supported by the new search feature, there is nothing for me to do but wait.

      You're still using that greasy Microsoft Entourage stuff? That's so 2003. You need to use Thunderbird!

      http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/

      You can export all your existing email from Entourage to Thunderbird by dragging your inbox folder to your desktop, thusly creating an .mbox file from it, and moving the .mbox file into ~/Library/Thunderbird/Profiles/default.vfn/Mail/Lo cal Folders

      Thunderbird with the Calendar extension (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/download .html)
      does pretty much anything Entourage does, and it doesn't suffer from that uber irritating problem of shitting it's pants when sending an email to multiple addresses and one of them happens to be invalid.

      It's just better, and it doesn't look gay like Apple's Mail.app

    4. Re:No Entourage? No thanks. by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying its apples fault - I'm saying I won't upgrade my OS if their search feature doesn't work with the email program I happen to use.

    5. Re:No Entourage? No thanks. by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Is there a conduit to sync with a Palm device, tho?

    6. Re:No Entourage? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a conduit to sync with a Palm device, tho?

      Indubitably.

      http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird /extensions/palmsync/palmsync.xpi

    7. Re:No Entourage? No thanks. by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      The problem is that Entourage would have to be rearchitected to store each message in a separate file in order for it to support Spotlight. I don't see that happening.

    8. Re:No Entourage? No thanks. by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's a quote from a Microsoft guy in the Ars Technica Tiger review. They apparently just need to write a Spotlight plugin to add Entourage search capability.

      ~Philly

    9. Re:No Entourage? No thanks. by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's possible, since a Spotlight plugin takes one file as input and produces one set of metadata as output. In order for each message to appear as a separate object to Spotlight, each message would have to be a separate file. Or Apple will have to fix Spotlight.

    10. Re:No Entourage? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you can get your mail out of Entourage and into Apple Mail. I did it and I am glad. Entourage really was a pain!

  146. I submitted this with a better headline. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thread is useless without pics!

  147. Re:Looking forward to Automator, Dashboard, and iC by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    Yes, you need the G5 to initiate the chat, but anyone can be on the other end. And I believe its only if you are doing video chat. I could be wrong though.

  148. Wendys by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    Reports that NY Times writer David Pogue found a severed finger in his copy of the new operating system have not been confirmed, although there is photographic evidence in his video review.

  149. Market Share by Aleman · · Score: 1

    So... if Macs start getting more market share from Tiger, what will the EU do? Would OS X have to be stripped of its most compelling features? I can see it now: Mac OS X Tiger Reduced Productivity Edition, without Spotlight, Quicktime, Dashboard, etc.

  150. Uptime + standy IS A DIFFERENT WORLD! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

    My powerbook gets uptimes of MONTHS. I reboot in the rare, rare event of a security patch that requires it (usually kernel stuff I think). When I want to use the computer, I open it up and it's ready in UNDER 3 seconds, everything running. When I'm done, I just close the lid and the laptop sleeps. I do this a dozen times a day, for MONTHS without a single thing freezing. The notion of rebooting or turning a computer off at night is archaic and obsolite for me.

    Another ease-of-use thing is this: I don't maintain ANYTHING. Patches are automatically checked for daily, and install automatically, on their own. No virii or spyware to worry about. Backups happen automatically to another comp via FTP. OSX defrags ON THE FLY! I don't "do" anything to maintain the comp. I just USE it. Being a programmer/geek/self-employed computer lover, it is so sweet going to this setup after living with Dos 3.22 through Windows XP SP2 and everything in between. I'll shut up now :)

    1. Re:Uptime + standy IS A DIFFERENT WORLD! by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Hey, right click on the input text boxes (like this one on slashdot) and you can select something like Check Spelling While You Type. I'm not entirely sure of the name because I'm posting from work. It's pretty awesome. :-)

  151. Mmmm by copponex · · Score: 1

    I'm a Mac dealer. I use Logic, Pro Tools, but not too much video stuff.

    My laptop (x86_64) gets more plugins in Pro Tools LE than a second generation Dual 2.0 G5, even though the G5 has 1GB versus 512 RAM on my laptop. That's not a fluke - I get faster results on P4s as well. Check out duc.digidesign.com for more information if you're really interested.

  152. Mod parent up by Lord+Grey · · Score: 1

    Someone with points spend them on the parent, please. That is probably one of the best analogies I've read in a long, long while.

    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
    1. Re:Mod parent up by Rihahn · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you. Analogy is a lost art these days.

  153. Spotlight Shortcut by ReadParse · · Score: 1

    Crap, they snagged my shortcut. I use command-space as a Snergy.app shortcut to toggle iTunes play and pause. Now every time I try to start and stop my music I'm going to get a spotlight search box, I guess, unless I can change that shortcut -- I doubt it.

    Well, fortunately, I'm never first in line to upgrade my Mac anyway. It will probably be a few months for me. I should go ahead and change my Synergy shortcut now to start getting used to something new.

    RP

    1. Re:Spotlight Shortcut by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes you can change it - mine is option-space, as Launchbar is too handy as cmd-space. You can even assign it to a F-key.

    2. Re:Spotlight Shortcut by ReblMonkey · · Score: 0

      Indeed; my Spotlight key is F13.

  154. Re:BFD - Apple propaganda by grunherz · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you're suffering with the stock 128MB of ram your 800mhz "flat panel mac" came with.

    In the time it took for you to post this, you could have upgraded the RAM in your hated "flat panel Mac".

    If you don't even know or can't even bother to give us the appropriate designation of the machine you own, or call your machine "slow" without even mentioning how much ram the machine is using, how are we supposed to take your rant seriously?

    --
    Four weeks, Twenty papers, that's two dollars ... plus tip.
  155. Re:Sure... by zpok · · Score: 1

    Not irrelevant (well, of course, this discussion is not very relevant). I reacted on your statement that OS X doesn't run on your favorite processor, so Linux on X86 was the obvious answer. It's not, since lots of people love Power and its siblings, notably to run various flavors of Linux or BSD on them. Among them Linus, and I know very well he doesn't run OS X, I presumed you did as well.

    Therefor, I think it's not fair to judge OS X on the hardware it runs on, or to judge the hardware because it doesn't use your favorite processor. Those are arguments that might make sense to you, but I bet there aren't many people who agree with you.

    This is as far as discussing this goes, what you use and for what reason is of course your choice, but not agreeing with you has nothing to do with fan-boyism whatsoever.

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  156. Re:Aging Panther Installs will Break Tiger Upgrade by ruckerz2k · · Score: 2, Informative

    Agreeed.. Definitely do a clean reinstall, or run Software Update before you go to Tiger if you plan on upgrading.

  157. Freedom from organization BAD for performance? by alispguru · · Score: 1

    I think it would be a pretty horrible world if users just put all their stuff in the same folder - with no attempts to categorize things.

    Don't know if this is true with OS X, but other Un*xes I've used have file system performance go to hell when individual folders have lots of files in them. Spotlight-dependent people may just dump everything in ~/Documents (default destination for lots of applications), then wonder why their system slows to a crawl when they open a document or create a new one.

    I assume Apple has thought of this already and hacked the hell out of the file system for scalable performance on large directories... right?
    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:Freedom from organization BAD for performance? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      Don't know if this is true with OS X, but other Un*xes I've used have file system performance go to hell when individual folders have lots of files in them.

      That's probably more of an issue of the particular on-disk file system type containing the folders. Linear directory searches are probably not going to be very good (although a scheme such as ext2's hash trees might help). Some UN*X file systems use, for example, B-trees for directories, and might work better.

      I assume Apple has thought of this already and hacked the hell out of the file system for scalable performance on large directories... right?

      Apple thought of that before Mac OS was UN*X; HFS uses a B-tree for directory information. ("B-tree", singular; the key is the parent directory "catalog ID" - think i-number - and the file name, so there's one big catalog for the entire file system; folders aren't files, they're just the collection of all nodes with the same parent directory catalog ID. See the HFS Plus Volume Format document.)

  158. i386 by Corson · · Score: 1

    If only Apple considered releasing MacOS X for Intel... (sigh)... I would dump both Windows and Linux.

    1. Re:i386 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and all the other "OS X on Intel" people bought NextStep/x86 when you had the chance, right? What? You didn't? But Apple should bet their business that you would this time around.

  159. Your forgetting one thing by cheesemp · · Score: 1

    I have my PC for years - I just upgrade as I can afford to (which isn't much or often). A Mac can't be kept reasonably update for £100 (~$175) a year - a PC can. If I move completely over to Linux (as I've been planning for about 5 years - damn games) then it would probably cost even less. Don't get me wrong OSX is nice but I can't afford even a quarter of a Mac Mini let alone anything else.

    --
    To Slashdot or not to Slashdot. That is the question (that will cause me to fail an interview)
    1. Re:Your forgetting one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In light of your most recent disclosure, cheesemp, and with all due respect, you're avowed lack of expendable income means that you arn't ANY company's target consumer, and thus a bit of an outlier from the mainstream.

      You also happen to be wrong about upgrades for Macs - at least for the Powermac line - chip upgrades are available from several vendors and memory and hard drive upgrading is on par with Intel/AMD-based machines, though typically with fewer drive bays.

    2. Re:Your forgetting one thing by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 1

      I have my PC for years - I just upgrade as I can afford to (which isn't much or often). A Mac can't be kept reasonably update for £100 (~$175) a year - a PC can. If I move completely over to Linux (as I've been planning for about 5 years - damn games) then it would probably cost even less. Don't get me wrong OSX is nice but I can't afford even a quarter of a Mac Mini let alone anything else.

      That's a red herring, since you don't need to keep a Mac "reasonably update" every year. You buy a Mac, and that machine is good to go for years.

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
    3. Re:Your forgetting one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually you have to change the power supply (XT->AT, AT-ATX, ATX->P4, etc) and/or your motherboard (new CPU won't fit) and/or memory (won't fit in new mobo) and/or videocard (ISA, VLb, PCI, AGP, PCi-X, etc).

      So, NO, you can't "upgrade forever". Every 2-3 years you do replace "the whole machine" (the tower) because too much has changed and you simply can't upgrade it.

    4. Re:Your forgetting one thing by cheesemp · · Score: 1

      Well there's two problem - I couldn't afford a Mac Mini as I said - I can afford the once a year PC upgrade. Yes my budget is that tight - I have enough loans and other debt's to keep me repaying for years (Bought my first house about a year ago).

      The other issue is games - even a Mac gets out of date for games.

      --
      To Slashdot or not to Slashdot. That is the question (that will cause me to fail an interview)
  160. when apple gets games... by generalleoff · · Score: 1

    ...I'll ditch Windows for a MAC. And I think that days coming soon, cuz there is alot of little hints floating around that when you add them up, you get the conclusion that Apple, IBM, and Sony have something up there sleeves.

  161. Re: XGrid by johnrpenner · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Its pretty cool that Apple choose to include XGrid as part of Tiger -- software to distribute complex tasks among a number of networked machines. Before it was only XCode (now updated to v2) that did distributed compiles. But XGrid should lead to more applications designed to take advantage of networked Macs for CPU-intensive operations.

  162. Dashboard use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is the example desklets aren't very interesting. It's like when people ask what the point of Tablet PCs is and they've got the marketing image of execudroids taking notes at meetings. Silly.

    A desklet that would actually be some use is a

    1. Re:Dashboard use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      notification that you hit 'Submit' without finishi

  163. It was poorly organized... by copponex · · Score: 1

    No, I don't expect Apple to do anything they don't want to do. I absolutely respect their vision, and if my grandmother needed a computer, she'd have a Mini in a heartbeat. I have one just because I sell Macs and I use it to keep my familiarity level high.

    I've had various laptops during those years, and my girlfriend still uses the 1.5ghz 15" powerbook that I purchased last fall. But when I put that down and pickup my Athlon 64 laptop, things are just faster in XP and Ubuntu. OpenOffice, Firefox, every game I ever play...

    My point is, people who like technology and are willing to fuss with it a little bit (like me) are really drawn to the Macs, because the operating system is the nicest we've seen. However, the investment in comparably fast hardware is something like 100% more. For me, that doesn't make any sense. The features don't deserve that kind of price tag - I know that's not true for everyone, but it is true for me.

  164. selling alienware for powerbook by Jamapor · · Score: 1

    i'd just like to proudly say that i'm selling my Alienware 51-m laptop and buying a new Powerbook =)

  165. Re:But which karma whore is the parent's originato by kpaul · · Score: 1

    Good lord. That's the funniest one of all. Too bad I'm out of mod points.

  166. Thank you! by copponex · · Score: 1

    Just thanks.

  167. Well I said I didn't by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I did say in my message I did not have kids. I fully admit that my viewpoint might be altered somewhat if I had them. So please don't hold too much against me as I am just saying what I feel from my own experiences as a kid (which as you say have altered over time for kids today). If nothing else I do appreciate parents having the choice to use technology in this way.

    I also am getting Tiger shortly, though I plan to go to Apple store as it's always a fun event. A lot more work than the UPS though!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Well I said I didn't by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      Touche. I'm sorry that I missed your disclaimer, although I still hold to my comments. Life changes when you become a parent.

    2. Re:Well I said I didn't by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      If, when you have kids, the world becomes a scary, evil place entirely full of predators just waiting to leap out at a moment's inattention and grab your kids... ...well, I guess I'm glad I'm not going to have kids, because I like living in the world I'm in right now. That would be the 'reality-based' world, where a kid is more likely to be hit by lightning than be targeted by an internet predator, and the famous '1/3 of all children are sexually molested' statistic is only true if you count 'the time little Jessica accidentally walked in on Uncle George in the bathroom' as sexual molestation. (It's true. They do. Also playing doctor with other kids, that's sexual molestation. And some other pretty outrageous stuff as well.)

      I thank the diety every time I imagine growing up in these times. When I grew up, I ran rampant over three miles of beach and two or three miles of semi-suburban neighborhood, unsupervised, from age 5 on up. And yet, the statistics of crimes against children are LOWER NOW than they were then.

      It's just that we're a bunch of insane paranoiacs now, and, apparently, oddly enough, we weren't then.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  168. Re:BFD - Apple propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What version of OS X is it running?

    I know it's throwing more money at the issue. But, all the successive versions of OS X are noticably faster (yes, even on older hardware). So it might be worth a $170 gamble to see if you can bring your 800MHz machine back to usability.

    Failing that, you should sell it. Someone wants it.

  169. Re:IPod hardware quality by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

    I got my Gen3 iPod last June. I haven't had one problem with it.

    I got my PowerBook 15" 1.67 GHz fully maxed out a couple of months ago. I haven't had a problem with it (although it's only been a couple of months).

    I don't see the quality issues you're talking about.

  170. Re:BFD - Apple propaganda by z-kungfu · · Score: 1

    Yep... the asshat didn't upgrade his RAM, bummer for him. I'll take it off of your hands...

  171. Games are not operating systems. by copponex · · Score: 1

    Do you understand that games aren't operating systems?

    I'm comparing two operating systems and their primary platforms - Darwin on PPC and Linux on x86. I'm saying Linux has all of the features, but no eye candy, so when Enlightenment, or another window manager that's stable with good eye candy arrives, OS X 10.4 will not be so appealing.

    Not so appealing, of course, if you can't imagine looking more than ten minutes into the future.

    1. Re:Games are not operating systems. by zoomba · · Score: 1

      It was a joke... ya know, humor.

      I was playing on the whole bit about how E takes years and years and years to develop and release a new version. It is the WM world equivalent of DNF, something that is long promised to blow the doors off of its arena, but takes forever to materialize.

      Yes, when a WM with such excellent eye candy arrives, 10.4 won't be so appealing since there will be competiton. However, by the time we see E17 released we'll have moved on to 10.7 probably. Yeah, it'll blow a several year old version of OS X away. Much like WinXP blows Win95 away in terms of usability and visual goodies.

      You're comparing something that is out today with something that may not be out for years yet, it's not a fair comparison and my DNF analogy holds up in that regard.

      Plus, it was a joke... laugh :)

  172. Smart Folders by Frobozz0 · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget one of the MOST powerful parts of Spotlight: the ability to make smart folders. Now, if you have a business you're going to want to make sense of some hard folders. But, for everything else you can set up alias folders that are based on criteria that will grab anything associated to that criteria into a smart folder.

    That's the new hotness.

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
  173. You get what you paid for by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    PC prices have dropped, and dropped faster than Mac prices.

    So has the quality, the security...
    Somethings are worth paying good money for, somethings are cheap in more ways than one.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:You get what you paid for by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

      So has the quality, the security...
      Somethings are worth paying good money for, somethings are cheap in more ways than one.


      It's also worth looking at the resale values of Macs vs. windows PC's on eBay. Macs do hold their value much better. That's useful information for somebody who replaces their computers every 3 years or so-- you can recover a lot of the initial cost when you resell it.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  174. yeah, PDF docs are crap by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    I used to deal with PDF technical docs at my last job. We had 18 volumes of user guides and when you had to find the definition of a specific term without knowing how it fit into the scheme of things, searching those 18 volumes was a real chore.

    I've been using Google's desktop search a lot at my current job. It might eventually help with your PDF problems. Currently, it doesn't seem to index PDF content, but their regular websearch does. So perhaps they'll add that functionality in the near future. I'm looking forward to Spotlight in Tiger. I like getting straight to information with Google's search toolbar a lot. Like when I need to find a person's email address, previously, I'd have to open my mail program, re-sort the mail list by name instead of date, then scroll to find the person's name. Now, I just type the person's name in the Google desktop search field, and it retrieves the text of the emails from that person and usually their email address is right there.

    Seth

    1. Re:yeah, PDF docs are crap by Mochatsubo · · Score: 1

      You can index PDF content with Acrobat Professional. It then makes searching a snap.

      -w

    2. Re:yeah, PDF docs are crap by Moofie · · Score: 1

      And Acrobat Professional only costs about as much as a Mac mini!

      OK, so it's only $300 instead of $500.

      I hate Adobe's pricing.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:yeah, PDF docs are crap by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      all pdf searches are, at some level, extracting the text and then indexing that.

      in a real pinch pdftotext -raw can be extremely powerfull if you script it right. (comes in xpdf)

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  175. Re:IPod hardware quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    According to the last tech who I talked to (and a few end users who I've met), a LOT of people are having hardware problems with their iPods

    Define "a lot". Millions of people own iPods. If only 1% are having issues, that's tens of thousands of people with broken iPods. If there were truly a problem, I'd have to believe it would be all over the Mac media.

  176. Mac savvy command line by ekc · · Score: 1

    Someone was telling me Apple has gone through and updated most of the file-handling tools to honour HFS+ meta-data. Is this true? Is there a list someplace of which ones they worked on?

    Also, is there any tool under Tiger that can query for Rendezvous/Bonjour services? I couldn't find anything like that in Panther, though maybe I wasn't looked hard enough.

    1. Re:Mac savvy command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone was telling me Apple has gone through and updated most of the file-handling tools to honour HFS+ meta-data. Is this true?

      Yes, it is true. I did see a list somewhere last week but I don't recall where. But I remember that mv, cp and rsync were on it, and there were several others.

  177. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    Um...yeah. Did you read what you just wrote?

    Why would you wait for 2 years for 'bouncy icons' in the first place?

    Why are you looking at desktop hardware when you've been waiting for a laptop?

    How do you get through a day when you don't even know who you are, or what you want?

    Congrats on your new laptop. I'm sure you won't miss a thing.

  178. Re:Sure... by rikkards · · Score: 0

    I love how my post got modded as flamebait. I was serious. If Apple actually released a version of OSX for X86 I wouldn't think twice about getting rid of Windows.

    I would love to run OSX but I am not about to go and buy a whole new machine just to run a different OS. And this is probably why linux will have a better chance at knocking some of MS usershare over to it than Apple.

  179. Re:BFD - Apple propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're getting tired of the Mac crap, then you should have read enough to know that as a gaming platform, the Mac is only adequate; however, it's an entirely kick-ass productivity machine, and that's what people have been talking about. For email, web, music, graphics, software development, etc., it smokes the competition. Buy a Mac for grown-up stuff, and a console for the kids (or your inner child, if you have one).

    It also must be said that, as a person whose family is at least familiar with pig wrestling, you are probably not representative of Apple's target demographic. Just sayin'...

  180. OpenGL Spec for Tiger? by wazzzup · · Score: 1

    Does anybody have any idea where OpenGL stands in Tiger? Does it meet the 2.0 spec? I know Apple was trying to hire an OpenGL guru a few months back to help tune performance. It would be really nice if they brought OpenGL up to par with Tiger.

  181. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by zoomba · · Score: 1

    I'm aware of all of this. And I love E, it would be my WM of choice if it had kept pace with tech advances. I'm really looking forward to E17 too, but I applied to college, went to college, graduated and got a full time job in the time since it was announced.

    My point (aside from a joke) was that it's not really reasonable comparing a current technology with something that could still be years away from release.

  182. Re:Looking forward to Automator, Dashboard, and iC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SO works at apple, mentioned the same thing. It's because their scaling/shading/etc. ops are just too intensive for the slower hardware. The dumb part is that you can't turn them off.

  183. This is the most common FUD against OSS by Agram · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is true that it takes time to build something and that time is money. Therefore, by building something one can conclude that we are investing money.

    However, what a lot of people fail to realize is that by buying a more expensive machine (a Mini in this case), you have to work to make that extra money as well. And to make the money you have to invest time.

    Therefore, in the end, whether you buy a more expensive piece of equipment or go for a cheaper and then invest some of personal time to bring it to workable state should likely yield comparable amount of investment. Yet, if you build something yourself in an non-restrictive environment you will be ultimately a lot better than simply buying a closed commercial product because you will have the more direct control over the end-product as well as a greater sense of personal attachment with the creation as you have, after all, participated in its conception.

    1. Re:This is the most common FUD against OSS by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      "...what a lot of people fail to realize is that by buying a more expensive machine, you have to work to make that extra money as well."

      But if it takes 10 hours to do something that could be paid for by 1 hour's work, you're losing out on the deal. So really you're advocating a course of action that is only viable for those who are well versed enough with hardware to do the job quickly (and well; doing it wrong takes twice as long).

      "...you will be ultimately a lot better than simply buying a closed commercial product because you will have the more direct control over the end-product..."

      There are different degrees of control; I'd argue that most people consider control to be "does what I want when I want it done with a minimum of fuss". Horses for courses. I view operating systems this way: Linux is for people who like being a sysadmin first, OS X is for people who like being productive first, and Windows is for people who don't like doing anything first ;).

      "...as well as a greater sense of personal attachment with the creation..."

      Why should that be so important? I see where you're coming from (having designed and built many circuits from the ground up I know the satisfaction of making an inanimate box of bits come to life), but a sense of attachment to a tool is bad if it makes you ignore the tool's deficiencies. Besides, I've seen too many people relieved that their computer is working at all to be convinced that investing emotion in what will inevitably be a piece of outdated junk* is somehow beneficial; it certainly isn't reciprocal.

      *Or it will become grandpa's axe.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:This is the most common FUD against OSS by Agram · · Score: 1

      "But if it takes 10 hours to do something that could be paid for by 1 hour's work, you're losing out on the deal. So really you're advocating a course of action that is only viable for those who are well versed enough with hardware to do the job quickly (and well; doing it wrong takes twice as long)."

      Such observations are simply meaningless as they are presented out of the context. To give you an example, one could very well end up having to order a finished product, wait for its delivery and then find out that it is broken and that you need to RMA it, etc. This would inadvertently be a huge loss of time (and therefore money).

      Making comparisons on purely theoretical grounds is useless. It would be more appropriate to simply inferr that at times one or the other approach may yield better results.

      Furthermore, it is important to point out long-term benefits (i.e. OS X will change when Apple wants it to change, possibly breaking everything and even forcing the user to get used to the new interface and therefore demanding a constant learning curve. Linux on the other hand, may not require such drastic adjustments once the user traverses the initial learning curve ).

      "...Linux is for people who like being a sysadmin first, OS X is for people who like being productive first, and Windows is for people who don't like doing anything first..."

      Now, you have to agree that this is stereotyping bollocks. Ultimately everyone wants to be productive, the question is what they consider being productive (hacking, developing, writing, troubleshooting, etc.).

      "Why should that be so important?"

      Well, judging from your comments you may appear to be favoring Apple. If so, you should definitely know all about that (including tool's deficiencies which, by the way, never stopped anyone from at least feeling as productive as they could ever be using the platform of their choice), as Apple has gone through great lengths to establish this imaginary umbilical cord between its product and end-user ;-).

      Ultimately, it is all about what you believe, yet it is unquestionable that the cliche argument of "time demands of OSS platform" is not as valid as one would want you to believe.

  184. Re:Sure... by Clockwurk · · Score: 1

    Linus uses a mac because he was given one for free.

  185. Re:IPod hardware quality by greed · · Score: 1
    I don't see the quality issues you're talking about.

    Try the G3 dual USB iBooks, entire product family.

    Granted, Apple is great at repairing the "Logic Board" issue free, but it is still annoying to be without your lapdog for a week or two every 3-4 months.

  186. $130 for a service pack? by bemenaker · · Score: 0, Troll

    Gee, what kind of sucker pays $130 for a service pack? Let alone someone who already was duped by this already buying Panther? The level of changes and the kind of changes that were made here, on the windows side, is called a Service Pack, and they are FREE!!!!!

    1. Re:$130 for a service pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your argument is old and tired, just like your post.

      snore.

    2. Re:$130 for a service pack? by bemenaker · · Score: 0, Troll

      Prove me wrong, it's true. Learn some about programming and you will understand this

    3. Re:$130 for a service pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So don't buy it if you don't like it. And if you don't buy it, why the hell should you care if someone else prefers Tiger? STFU.

    4. Re:$130 for a service pack? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      I'm afraid I don't have time to prove you wrong, or learn programming. I'm too busy not battling viruses, trojans and spyware, and not waiting for a dog to deliver search results when he's done licking his own balls.

      Wow. Come to think of it, I have tons of time! I think I'll learn how to program!

    5. Re:$130 for a service pack? by bemenaker · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm glad to see Apple supporting their products. I am glad to see they finally have a real operating system, something to match the excellent hardware they have always produced. I am just shocked that all you mac fanboys are so quick to buy a service pack, and not demand this stuff for free. Win XP's SP 2 was this big of an overhaul. Win XP64 is this big of an overhaul, it's free, if you already have XP32. For the record, I use XP, Linux, HP UX, AIX, and VMS daily.

    6. Re:$130 for a service pack? by idsofmarch · · Score: 1

      And, Macs only have a one-button mouse and they're expensive, and Al Gore claimed he invented the internet. See sig.

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    7. Re:$130 for a service pack? by idsofmarch · · Score: 1
      Just a question, was the change from Windows 2000 to Windows XP significant enough to warrant $300 at the time it came out? Why or why not?

      Couldn't it be possible that the Windows system, including Service Packs, is not the only way to develop and promote operating systems and Apple's way is just simply different from the Windows system and therefore you're comparison is flawed?

      How much have you read about Tiger and do you understand that not only are there new features, but also some serious 'under-the-hood' changes?

      Is it just distinctly possible that you don't know anything about Panther or Tiger and are just simply repeating another wonderful internet meme that will go round and round everytime someone mentions Apple?

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    8. Re:$130 for a service pack? by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      So what do you think you're getting in Longhorn? According to your standards, it's just going to be a service pack (and it's rapidly shrinking in scope).

      But then, trolls like you probably pirate it anyway.

      I've got my copy of Tiger here at work, and it's far more than a service pack. You can see a lot of it on Apple's site.

      But then, trolls like you never try to understand anything about the topic of your rantings.

      Spotlight looks very interesting.

      But then, trolls like you probably think it's Google desktop search or that you can get better on a PC.

      Automator looks amazing.

      But then, trolls like you probably only play games and don't understand that people use their computers for anything more.

      Core Data will lead to new apps that are simpler to develop. So will Core Image and Core Video.

      But then, trolls like you couldn't write a line of code if your life depended on it.

      All reports show better performance under Tiger than on previous versions of OS X.

      But then, trolls like you prefer to upgrade your PC rather than expect better performance from your OS upgrades.

      Am I making lots of assumptions about you? Sure. But then, trolls like you probably don't understand the big words, preferring words of one syllable or less. I think it's just nice to vent on some moron with a poor grasp of logic and facts and who can't contain their own massively bloated sense of self-worth.

      Go back to your games, little troll. Go back to your safe little world where nobody who thinks differently exists. Your opinions are valueless, except as sharp relief from the more sensible posts around Slashdot.

    9. Re:$130 for a service pack? by amjith · · Score: 1

      "For the record, I use XP, Linux, HP UX, AIX, and VMS daily"
      WTF should i do???

  187. Biggest Tiger annoyance by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    You will find that Stuffit is no longer included, and that Stuffit has somehow overnight turned into another Realaudio, where you are required to jump through hoops and navigate 3 pages and wait for an email just to download the 'free' version, and that installs a menubar icon, and signs you up for spam. Sweet!

    Admittedly, less software is being packed with Stuffit, and the built-in 'archive' works great. I had to grab the old version when I ran an 'archive and install' from my old restore disc, because there's still some stuff out there that uses it.

    I'm rather disappointed that Stuffit has gone the way of Real, but oh well. Nothing like digging your own grave. I'll be interested in seeing how Stuffit is doing in 6 months.

    It's rather telling that that is my biggest annoyance I've found so far - Tiger rocks.

  188. Re:Need the G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  189. Building a computer with worthless time... by ender- · · Score: 1

    And if you freelance for $80/hr or are self employed for $120/hr, that time you spend building a computer or buying one is worth how much?

    Lets face it. If we were pulling in $80-120/hr, we wouldn't be niggling over a few hundred dollars in the price of a computer.

    People who build their computers seem to fall into two general camps. 1)Those who do it because they enjoy it, and 2) those who do it because they don't have the available cash to drop on an over-priced pre-built system. If they have a little money and some free time, they choose to spend some of that free time building instead of the money to pay someone else to build it.

    I currently fit into both groups. I generally try to get the best deal I can on parts. I don't mind spending my time building the computer because I really enjoy it. Now I am starting to make more money, and I have a baby on the way so it may come to pass in the not to distant future that the exchange rate of my time to the money saved may not be worth it, and I may choose to buy a pre-built system the next time I'm ready to upgrade; but it's hardly fair to say that my time is currently worthless just because I choose to spend some of it building my computers.

    Ender-

    1. Re:Building a computer with worthless time... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I didn't say your time is worthless. That's why I put a price on time.

      There are creative types (who gravitate toward Mac anyway) who create all the time. If they're not getting paid to create something, they do it for their own library which will get reworked into something else later.

      I fall into both camps. I build my own systems and bought a Mac a while ago. I love both but the Mac was ready to go out of the box. Already familiar with OSX, I just had to install updates, Eclipse, MySQL and I was ready to go to produce work for clients.

      I will most likely build a 64-bit system next because I'd like to and will also buy a PowerBook in the near future. It only makes sense to do whatever makes your time worthwhile to you.

      If purchasing a system ready to go in 1 hour is profitiable, then so be it. If spending a weekend building a system is profitable (in the experience account), then so be it. I like building systems but I have more demands on my time now and it becomes a management descision.

      If I can make more money cranking out code, I'm going to do it the fastest way I can. I'm just really gratefull for the Eclipse project so I can be platform agnostic.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  190. liar, liar, pants on fire by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Informative



    I have a G5 Powerbook at work...

    Unless this guy works in the Apple skunkworks, this is highly impossible. Nice try, troll. The rest of his post is suspect as well... The OS X native version of Office sucks?!? Wonder why MS's Mac OS X development team keeps receiving accolades for it...
    Seth

    1. Re:liar, liar, pants on fire by lunadog · · Score: 1

      Ok, I meant G4..

      Happy now?

      OSX office crashes like nothing you've ever seen before without patching.. and even after that it is _slow_.. it has difficulty keeping up with even moderate size documents with embedded diagrams.. So I really don't know what sort of award it deserves..

      The rest was just my experince.. I really wanted to like it.. I bought it specifically because I didn't want to give any more of my money to Redmond, but although I prefer it to WinXP, I was seriously underwhelmed.

  191. Re:IPod hardware quality by klang · · Score: 1

    my iPod is made in China .. the other hardware is probably made there as well .. just next to plant where they make any other electronic product we buy .. The Chineese make it, we buy it.

    Haven't had problems with the iPod .. yet ;-)

  192. Yes, zoomba! by copponex · · Score: 1

    Duke Nukem Forever is much better than World of Warcraft.

  193. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

    The only thing that worried me is that each instance of a widget in Dashboard took 5-10MB of real memory and about 100MB of virtual memory. Any real Mac guru's know what the hell that is about?

    I believe all the 100MBs are the exact same 100MBs, shared among the various widgets.

    Dashboard uses the WebKit, which means that each widget would have the whole Cocoa framework loaded in, and then some.

    But OS X only maps in Cocoa and the rest once. It isn't duplicated in memory for every Cocoa app and Dashboard widget.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  194. Re:IPod hardware quality by Tilmitt · · Score: 1

    "Overseas"? Something being made overseas in no way indicates its quality. I assume you are an American to have made such a statement. American's can make crap just like everyone else.

    --
    This guy are sick.
  195. Apple Strategy by bananahead · · Score: 1
    I have always, in the past, known the answer to this, but there are serious discontinuities occuring in the Apple world that could caluse a shft in strategy. I believe this shift in strategy could bring Micrsosoft to its knees.

    The question: Why doesn't Apple port their OS to Intel hardware?

    The old answer: Because the vast majority of Apple's revenue depends on the MAC, which includes the Apple proprietary hardware. To fuss with this equation would mean taking a risk with the very fabric of the company. Apple does not see the wisdom in this.

    I know there are a few other reasons such as application portability and having to create more of a driver model to the OS, but I have always believed the primary reason is Apple stability.

    Now, given that the excellent iPod now makes up over 30% of Apple's revenue, the release of Tiger, which at first blush (and from my inside knowledge of Longhorn) blows the doors off the future Microsoft offerings, why wouldn't Apple reconsider the option of porting Tiger to the Intel platform? I have heard from a number of people, some informed, some dreamers, some drug influenced, that Apple DOES have an Intel port of Tiger in a back room, and that in fact they have aways created an INtel version of every OS they create.

    Given all of the above, combined with the growing anti-Windows anxiety I keep hearing, I would ask the following question:

    What would be the effect on the Windows market ($15BILLION+ Microsoft revenue stream) if you could order a Dell platform and choose between Windows and Tiger?

    I believe the effect to Microsoft would be immediate and huge. I am not a MAC owner, the last MAC I used was in 1993. However, I am a semi-professional photographer and the MAC is looking better and better to me all the time. In my real life I am an Executive Consultant and have to use Windows because that is what everyone else uses. I am getting VERY close to purchasing a dual-G5, the Tiger OS may push me over the edge. The reason I hesitate? I just am not comfortable with the closed hardware model. If I could put Tiger on my existing six systems at home, I would not hesitiate.

    Apple, are you missing out on an opportunity to win the war here??????

    --
    A most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is if they foul up there's no law against wacking them around a bit.
    1. Re:Apple Strategy by rokzy · · Score: 1

      why bother?

      how many thousands of devices are there that would need drivers? you think all the companies will just decide to help Apple out? you think Apple has the time to do it themselves, even if they could?

      and for what? to run a great OS on crap hardware? even if I could run it on x86, which you can with an emulator, I wouldn't because I love the iBook hardware as much as the software.

      PPC is a better architecture than x86 anyway.

      so porting would be a world of pain and the potential market is tiny: take the small Mac market, take the tiny fraction that wants x86, subtract the large portion that would use linux instead - it would be simpler for Apple to just throw their money into a big pit, at least then they would save on tech support.

    2. Re:Apple Strategy by bananahead · · Score: 1
      You react as a typical MAC user without seeing the world as markets and revenue. I cannot see how the MAC hardware is somehow superior to the INtel platform. Different? Yes. Superior? Who cares? You will find that the MAJORITY of the markets for either OS could care less about the underlying hardware along as it is fast enough and there is plenty of memory. Crap hardware? Exactly what criteria do you use to determine this? I have PC's that have been running for years and years without so much as a hitch. Who cares? Ultimately it is the user experience that really matters, not the hardware.

      PPC is a better architecture? And exactly how does this change your life? Are you one of the 12 remaining assmbly-language programmers still breathing? When I am running Photoshop on a G5 or a 3.5Ghz Intel, how exactly do I tell that one hardware architecture is better than the other?

      Get real pal and welcome to the new century. It's all about the user.

      --
      A most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is if they foul up there's no law against wacking them around a bit.
    3. Re:Apple Strategy by phillymjs · · Score: 2, Informative

      The question: Why doesn't Apple port their OS to Intel hardware?

      Once again time for me to dust off and repost this:
      ----------
      Look, you guys just can't get it through your heads that the reason why OS X works so well is because it runs on such a limited pool of hardware-- this allows the engineers coding OS X to make assumptions THAT CANNOT BE MADE in the x86 world, where a machine could be using one of thousands of motherboards, network cards, graphics cards, sound cards, etc. Windows developers have to code for the lowest common denominator. OS X developers code for specific hardware. Even the version of NeXTStep that ran on Intel hardware ran on a tiny subset of the available PC hardware. If your CD-ROM drive and motherboard weren't on the "supported hardware" list that came with NeXTStep, you were SOL.

      That little fantasy you all have of buying "Mac OS X for x86", running it on some homebuilt shitbox you cobbled together from spare parts, and having it work as well as a G5 runs Panther today will NEVER come to pass. Microsoft has spent twenty years and untold millions trying to achieve that goal, and they still have quite a way to go.

      Do you think Jobs could just snap his fingers one day and a few months later have a product on the shelves that would run perfectly on every PC capable of running XP today? It's impossible. And even if it were possible, you wouldn't buy it. Why? Because Apple uses their software to sell their hardware, so a copy of OS X for x86 would have to be priced to ease the pain of a lost hardware sale-- you'd either do without it and bitterly bitch about the price here on /., or you'd pirate it-- either way, Apple would lose money on it.

      ~Philly

    4. Re:Apple Strategy by bananahead · · Score: 1
      (remaining calm...)

      First of all, I suggested being able to go to Dell and order a box with a choice of OS, not, as you so sweetly put it "in a MAC-biased attitude that reeks of liberalism, a homebuilt shit-box you cobbled together...". Get your head out your two-buttoned ass and think about reality for a minute. Apple doesn't give a shit about your little protected environment and your closed-minded attitude about alternate choices, they care about REVENUE. It really isn't all about you...

      Do I think Jobs could just snap his fingers and a few months later have a version of Tiger that would run on very specific configurations of Dell equipment? Yes, I do. Do I think they could have a serious impact on Microsoft markets and revenue? Yes I do. Do I think they could FINALLY attract a customer base that understood reality and that the Intel hardware platform is probably just as good as the MAC platform? We can only hope.

      --
      A most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is if they foul up there's no law against wacking them around a bit.
    5. Re:Apple Strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let it go. It will never happen.

    6. Re:Apple Strategy by rokzy · · Score: 1

      it changes my life because my completely silent 1.2Ghz PPC iBook blows my deafening 1.6GHz PC out of the water. THAT is the user experience. THAT is why I'm writing this on my "iBook desktop" (iBook + stand + bluetooth keyboard/mouse + wireless connection to speakers) while my PC sits useless, waiting to be given to a family member.

      this is of course the low end. at the high end where raw performance is desired the dual G5s blow the intels out of the water too. so top to bottom PPC is better. THAT is why it is a better architecture.

    7. Re:Apple Strategy by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      First of all, I'd bet the farm that Apple will not make OS X for x86.

      Secondly, even if they do, it won't run on commodity hardware-- it will run on x86-based, Apple-branded boxes only. Because like it or not, the lion's share of Apple's revenue, which funds practically everything else they do, comes from their hardware sales. You're right, Apple DOES care about revenue-- you saw what happened to Apple's revenue when the Mac clones were around in the late 90s, didn't you? (In case you missed it, the company damn near died from the clones.) So if you'll still have to buy a new computer to run OS X (just like you do now), why should Apple go to the trouble of migrating to x86? It'll just piss off developers who will have to update all their Mac products, and existing Mac users, who will have to repurchase all their software again-- who just did that a few years ago when they moved from OS 9 to OS X.

      Finally, Apple and Dell will NEVER strike up any kind of relationship due to the egos of and animosity between their respective CEOs. (Dell only sold iPods for a couple minutes because they didn't have a competing product of their own at the time.) Besides that, no matter how big they are, Dell is still beholden to Microsoft. If Dell pisses off Microsoft, Microsoft could revoke their Windows license tomorrow and put them out of business. Dell only makes a half-assed attempt at offering systems with Linux preloaded, and that's without giving special consideration to the hardware that goes into them. Partnering with Apple to sell Dells running OS X would require a much deeper level of cooperation between the two companies, and I just don't see it happening.

      ~Philly

    8. Re:Apple Strategy by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      It's Mac, not MAC. Mac is an abbreviation of Macintosh.

    9. Re:Apple Strategy by bananahead · · Score: 1
      Believe me when I say this: Dell doesn't give a shit about Microsoft. There is no way Microsoft could revoke their license, change their pricing or any other thing because of the legal decree Micrsoft operates under. IT CANNOT HAPPEN.

      That said, yours is the first rational response I've seen. Thx.

      --
      A most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is if they foul up there's no law against wacking them around a bit.
  196. Yeah right! by chrisnewbie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Tiger is the classiest version of Mac OS X ever and, by many measures, the most secure, stable and satisfying consumer operating system prowling the earth.'

    I have one Mac user and he made his MAc os x crash big time by applying a patch!! talk about stability, he had to go to a MAC shop fot them to run programms and finally re-install everything.
    You cant even ctrl-alt-del or use safemode to restore to a previuosly good config.
    Microsoft may have some bugs but at least they have tools to help you restore your desktop 90 % of the time without having to re-install everything.

    --Mac user will have only one finger in the future--

    1. Re:Yeah right! by bluethundr · · Score: 1

      You cant even ctrl-alt-del or use safemode to restore to a previuosly good config.

      Nothing is worse than a "know it all". No, there's no "safe mode" (yeah, a sign of a "real operating system") but there is "single user mode" just as there is on all *NIX boxes. Command key+s on startup gets you there. If you know what you're doing you can do a lot once you're in single user mode.

      As to no "Ctrl+Alt+Del" even the inventor of that particular convention, (as reported previously here on slashdot) said it was intended to be cumbersome and inconvenient so that you wouldn't hit it incorrectly. He never dreamed that Microsoft would turn it into the convention that it has evolved (devolved?) into.

      --
      Quod scripsi, scripsi.
  197. Re:So what's really new?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? How could you not pay for a search, quicktime, printing, etc upgrade... err.. I mean, new OS release?

    And of course you would never think to go to one of those "evil" sites that allow you to download it for free! By doing that you wouldn't be paying and supporting Apple for a minor up... I mean new OS release!

  198. fuck off and die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you want a Mac without an OS, then go buy your PC shitbox and be happy with it. nobody cares

  199. I'm seeing this, too! by cjsnell · · Score: 2, Informative

    One thing I have noticed so far is that Expose seems a lot less fluid than in Panther. Has anyone else noticed this, or am I going mad? The difference is noticable even with only a couple of windows on the desktop.

    Yes, I absolutely have noticed the slowness. I'm sitting here on my dual G5 2.0GHz with 1.5GB RAM and (what I thought was) a decent graphics card and its definitely a LOT less smooth than in Panther.

    Another thing that I've noticed is a problem with font smoothing on my home machine, a Quicksilver G4 with a GeForce3 card. For some reason, most of my fonts look like total crap. I've tried every permutation of the font smoothing settings but nothing seems to help. Has anyone else seen this problem?

    1. Re:I'm seeing this, too! by cjsnell · · Score: 1


      For comparison, here is a screenshot from my G5, which does not exhibit the problem. The fonts look much clearer on this machine.

    2. Re:I'm seeing this, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er.. the first one looks a lot better on my monitor, a lot easier to read

    3. Re:I'm seeing this, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shit man, that's the *best* i can get fonts to look with my mini on panther. the mini would be perfect if it wasn't for the blurry, headache-inducing, motion-sickness-causing fonts. like your experience, no amount of tweaking can help the terribly fuzzy font effect, which renders the computer all but useless for long-term monitor-viewing. i'm sick and tired of hearing the mac fanboys with their "that's how its supposed to look!" and "get a flat-panel!!" do they understand how completely ridiculous that sounds? to date, i have not found one piece of helpful information regarding the fuzzy font problem on os x. note: tinkertool does not count... shutting off anti-aliasing completely is a hack of major proporations, as the fonts in os x were *designed* to be anti-aliased. removing the anti-aliasing completely literally leaves the fonts a brittle, creaking mess.

    4. Re:I'm seeing this, too! by trans_err · · Score: 1

      I saw this after it booted for the first time (notably on the Login screen), but after a reboot and some time working-- I havnt noticed it again.

    5. Re:I'm seeing this, too! by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      You running through VGA or DVI? That could be making a huge difference, especially since some Minis (seems to be no consensus on what proportion of them) put out analog video at a lower voltage than the spec calls for.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  200. in four words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And please explain to me how freeware ups the cost of the OS

    Time.

    Is.

    Money.

    Dickhead.

  201. Raving reviews??? No way!!! Ya kidding me??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did they ever have any other reaction to Apple's announcements? They are always raving, just a raving bunch of creative, sofisticated, exclusive, wankers. Apple fans remind me of my old drill sarg... simply incapable of talking like the rest of us, always screaming on top of their lungs "overaccentuating" every word :) Don't misunderstand me, I like Macs, Macs are great, Herman Miller Aeron Chairs are great, Duncan Taylor Cask Strength single malts are great... but are they so great I would give in to using one proprietary hardware running proprietary OS? No! 'Cause I like variety! This is what America is all about, variety! Macs are unamerican! Buying Macs you're aiding Taliban!

  202. A long running factual error by Mossberg by pojo · · Score: 2, Informative

    This has been stated by Mossberg and not contradicted in at least the first few Google results.

    And the standard delete key on a Mac works like the backspace key, not the delete key, in Windows. Mac desktop keyboards have a second, Windows-type delete key, but Mac laptops lack one.

    This is 50% true. If you hold Function and push backspace, you get the desired forward-delete. There are two problems with this: a) it isn't labeled directly on the keyboard and b) it is ugly to describe. But I assure you it becomes habit very quickly.

  203. Tiger on PearPC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone tried the *cough* piratebay *cough* Tiger release on PearPC? Even after converting the .dmg to .iso it says boot file not found or something.

  204. Re:IPod hardware quality by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Where is this magical non-overseas factory that never makes faulty products?

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  205. boxes change by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    I have a particular PC that has served as my workstation, HTPC (home theater PC) and is currently a file server. I have been using Win XP Pro for all of these purposes. XP Pro is fine for workstations, but not that great for HTPCs or servers. I really needed Media Center for the HTPC and 2k3 for my server.

    A PC often gets retasked during its lifetime. It would be great if you could just flip a few administrative switches and get the behavior you want. Windows will never do this because M$ makes too much money selling differentiated OSes. Linux would be good at this if anyone was willing to expend the effort to come up with these functions in just one distro (or maybe someone has?) Solaris and MacOS are both all inclusive, but they have certain functional gaps.

  206. Bad for QT Pro users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've had Tiger for a week and should warn that while everything seems to work fine, a major problem for some videographers is that QuickTime is upgraded autyomaticaly to QT7, and those with QT6.5Pro are SOL. Your QT6.5Pro license DOESN'T carry over to QT7. You could open the 6.5 app if you archive it. But the hassle is with Safari's pluggin. And once you go through this, you can't reinstall QT6.5 using QT installer.

  207. Developers get beta versions.. by gimpboy · · Score: 1

    And anyone can become a developer.

    I wouldn't be surprised if people like Mossberg forked over the $500 or so to be a "developer". Sure you still have to sign NDA's but you get a couple months or so to see how things are panning out. By a week before the final release you have a good idea of what outstanding bugs and issues were present. You can also read a little and figure out which have been fixed and which are still present. I would imagine this is how many of the people who review these products are able to write good reviews.

    --
    -- john
    1. Re:Developers get beta versions.. by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      I think you're immensely trusting.

      Maybe there's a journalist out there so dilligent. And maybe mossberg is that guy.

      But most of this stuff gets cribbed from the media release, is an unattributed quote from a friend who's an expert, what they heard in the pub, and a couple of days using the OS on the free hardware they scammed apple into sending.

      real work would interfere from real journalism (see earlier reference to pub).

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  208. Re:Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah? well, i can get condoms for free, but do i us e them? No

  209. Mail.app ate my mail by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    I fired up Apple's Mail and although there were counts on my mailboxes, as soon as I clicked on them, the counts disappeared and there was nothing inside. Where did all my archived mail go? Even though I use Gmail mostly nowadays, I need to be able to access old mail for archival purposes. Anyone else see a bug like this when upgrading to Tiger?

    1. Re:Mail.app ate my mail by gkearney · · Score: 2, Informative

      Go into the Mail folder of /Users/[yourusername here]/Library/Mail/Mail Bundles and remove any third party add on you may have.

      Then restart Mail. It will then work. I found that an HTTP Mail bundle I had installed some time ago caused the new Mail app to do this. Once I removed it all was fine.

    2. Re:Mail.app ate my mail by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

      YOU ROCK!

      That was it! I had installed HTTPMail also, some time ago! Thank you!!

  210. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

    How are you measuring that? It's possible that we have a utility that's showing memory usage misleadingly.

    Dashboard clients are little Web Views, which means they rely on Web Kit. Web Kit is a shared framework; it only gets loaded into memory once.

    It's possible that whatever you were using to measure that reported the memory usage of Web Kit once per Dashboard client, which is not correct.

  211. Re:Which is faster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dual G5 would destroy it in 99% of tests.

  212. I have a solution for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It'll run about $500 + tax and shipping and is kind of cute.

  213. Re:BFD - Apple propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I concur. It took Macs 20 minutes to copy 17 MB file. ;P

  214. Its not innovative enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, Spotlight = robust Launchbar, and Dashboard = Konfabulator. This is nothing short of a tweak-fest on the part of the Apple developers going on the business crap that is lacking from the upper management.
    I have NO CLUE why people are raving about this release like its a change from OS 9 to 10.0. Its slow, certain applications crash, and there are networking issues for certain issues. Sure, the propanda machine is running, and this run-up is great and all - but its just a money making release with a number of updates that give a modest gain to market share.
    Longhorn is going to suck more, and for all the window-nites ... OSX is still that... OSX.
    I'm die-hard mac user, don't get me wrong, but this release is just to "refresh" the OS in the same way they refresh hardware lines.

    Its a good operating system, and its pretty and all - but its just not revolutionary in terms of standards of the PREVIOUS OS releases. Not even CLOSE.

  215. Re:So what's really new?? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

    Oh YEAH look at these *new* features!

    Envelope Printing
    System Info Command
    Improved Display Alert
    Calendar Widget
    Disk Utility Improvements
    Document Properties
    Save as HTML
    Scientific Calculator
    Equalizer
    About This Mac
    Font Libraries

    Damn, seems to me that you're just licking the friggin koolaid of Jobs' dick.

  216. not to mention... by jspivack · · Score: 1

    searchable/sortable metadata. I'm not talking about Spotlight; just being able to search for files based on what's in the "comments" field, or by its label; or to be able to sort a detail view by comment or by label. God I miss that here at work...

  217. Re:It is viruses by mcsnee · · Score: 1

    Viri means "men."

    Virus (="slime," the root of the common English word) is a fourth-declension collective noun. Its plural, if it had one, would be virus.

    Use "viruses."

  218. Spam/virii? by generationxyu · · Score: 1
    In related news Mossberg also covers the rising incidence of spam/virii in the Windows world

    I'm not even going to criticize the use of "virii..."

    But this is taking it a bit far, I think. You can't blame an operating system for increased spam. Unless he means popup/spyware spam, this is just unfounded. Sure, OS X's Mail.app has an awesome spam filter, and it's probably better in Tiger, but the reason you're getting it has nothing to do with your OS. I may be an Apple fanboy, but I get more spam than most Windows users I know...

    --
    I mod down pyramid schemes in sigs.
    1. Re:Spam/virii? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You can't blame an operating system for increased spam.

      Sure you can, if the operating system's weak-ass, easily-circumvented security allows a machine to get easily zombied and become an SMTP relay for a spammer. I don't have to look any further than my mailserver logs to see how much of a problem that is. All day long, my machine is refusing connections from machines in the DHCP pools of consumer broadband ISPs who specifically prohibit running servers.

      ~Philly

  219. small facts make you working faster by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    fac 1, eject jumpdrive. I have a jumpdrive, if I opened an Explorer window related with the jumpdrive, my XP box won't allow me to eject the jump drive. On my OS X box, the Finder closes that window and ejects the jumpdrive.

    fact 2, drag document to dock (taskbar). On windows, running tasks are shown on taskbar as icons+title. If you drag and drop a file onto that icon+title, windows will tell you that you are stupid. On OS X, you do the same thing, the document will be opened.

    fact 3, ls is easier to type than dir

    fact 4, press f9, you can find the window you want to work with very quickly. Try f10 and f11 if you don't know that yet.

    fact 5, OS X can mount FTP or other server as if they are local directory.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    1. Re:small facts make you working faster by gyg · · Score: 1
      fact 5, OS X can mount FTP or other server as if they are local directory.

      XP does that too, under "my network places".

  220. Apple has games... by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    Here.

    Sure, they may not be the absolute latest, but unless you're hardcore, they've got enough.

  221. and the obligatory filesystem bug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tiger doesn't play nicely with volumes formatted under the UNIX filesystem (as offered as an option on disk utility). For all those who saw the option and thought 'great, that must be the best choice, after all OS X is really UNIX' (and then found out Apple included it for compatibility with some legacy Sun system or some such). They may not appear at all, or take ages to appear on the desktop. And - again - DON'T REBOOT WITH A DV CAMERA AND FIREWIRE DRIVE ATTACHED. This killed the filesystem on the FW drive(resurrected with DiskWarrior). Actually, it seems to go foobar with a camera and FW drive connected simultaneously at any time (random hangs when accessing volumes, won't capture from the deck while the drive is plugged in, etc.). Camera was Canon DM1, drive Lacie 320 FW800 model FYI. Apparently.

  222. Interestingly, though... by FredFnord · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...it's illegal for you to run Apache, OpenSSHd, and PostgreSQL on your Windows machine. Or, at least, it's illegal for you to actually serve more than one person off of them. The license doesn't let you have multiple people connecting to your machine like that, if I recall correctly.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    1. Re:Interestingly, though... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      The license doesn't let you have multiple people connecting to your machine like that, if I recall correctly.

      You recall incorrectly. Try proving your claims with a link next time.

      The "seat licensing" of Windows has to do with Windows clients logging into Windows servers. They have similar licensing restrictions on SQL Server and IIS.

      It has nothing to do with, and does not restrict you from using, your own third party apps like Apache or PostgreSQL.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  223. well I suppose that's all well and good by ashpool7 · · Score: 1

    if your definition of "handle" is "to not crash and burn." Come on now, I expect Apple's products to "handle" Tiger, even my 400 Mhz G4.

    The real answer is "the Mini does most of the CoreImage effects." Don't pander to people, give it to them straight. The Mini is a very basic Macintosh for people skittish about large investments in unproven (to them) technology. If their only complaint is that the ripple effect doesn't work on their machine, then the Mini has done its job: converting them and making them interested in upgrading.

  224. Re:Looking forward to Automator, Dashboard, and iC by willutah · · Score: 1

    To me, Dashboard looks like a throwback to the Mac System 6 Desk Accessories. Oh the nostalgia. The tile puzzle! What comes around, goes around.

  225. Mail.app crashes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to crash mail.app every few minutes. I think it has something to do with SSL (I use IMAP over SSL, with a self-signed cert). 10.3 popped up a warning each time mail launched, but I can remember 10.2 crashing when SSL was enabled. 10.4's mail crashes either shortly after the warning message, or when it tries to get new mail.

    Hope this one is fixed in 10.4.1 soon.

  226. One O/S to serve them all by objekt · · Score: 1
    There is NO "OS X Light." There's just one O/S to serve them all...

    No, the one to serve them all is OS X Server.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  227. root password in single user mode? by tburt11 · · Score: 1
    Anybody know if Apple fixed single user mode so that it requires the root password?

    I have a handful of macs that I admin, and tho the mac users don't know it, they can get root by simply holding down the "S" key during startup.

    I ordered the upgrade anyway.

  228. Making it Cuss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    While working in tech support for a game company there was obviously little respect for Macs.
    There was one of the early iMacs which was used for testing...rarely.
    Hearing coworkers cussing in their cubicles was never that big of a deal. It happened all of the time. One day, I got off of a call and I heard someone cussing and didn't recognize the voice. It took a few seconds for me to figure out that it sounded familiar. That's when I walked back to the iMac and saw that one of the techs had discovered that you could type cuss words into Simple Text and get the computer to read it out loud.

    I told them about using speakable items and about the choices of voices they could use. It was amazing that those features alone suddenly made the Mac more useful to my coworkers.
    ****
    Sometimes, when I don't feel like reading article online, I cut and paste artcles into a text editor and just have it read to me using Victoria's voice, Though for articles on politics, I just use the Deranged voice. Everything makes more sense then.

  229. Re:So what's really new?? by rwrife · · Score: 1

    Ok, there are a couple features that are probably new...but the rest are worthless little applications, minor updates, and/or freely available tools anyway. Looking over the list I see stuff like GCC (openly available), About This Mac (I would have expected this in MacOS v1.0), AIM Profile Editor (ehh?), PDF Viewer(acrobat not working on MacOS??), Buy Printing Supplies (sounds like bloatware to me)..... If you remove the BS from the list of 200 features you're reduced to: -Spotlight -Development tools freely available elsewhere -Misc bug patches and featuers you'd expect in an OS -Misc features, like stock ticker, that don't belong in an OS but they're including them anyway

  230. Not simple by TuringTest · · Score: 1


    Spotlight is just a simple UI on a commonly used programming idiom.


    You could say that iTunes hasn't anything interesting either, it's just a media player and a database.

    Spothlight is mainly an UI, but it's not simple. Proof is that previously there wasn't any interface that got it right until now. Making good interfaces requires research and a lot of work, just like making good backends. The revolution in Spotlight is not in the backend, but you dismissing the value of a GUI doesn't make it suddenly vanish.

    Maybe you don't (consciously) value easy of use and no learning curve, but most people recognize it when they find it. Good interfaces *are* revolutionary, and Apple has got several of them

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  231. Re:BFD - Apple propaganda by idsofmarch · · Score: 1

    How much memory did that iMac have?

    --
    Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
  232. Re:Looking forward to Automator, Dashboard, and iC by amichalo · · Score: 1

    To me, Dashboard looks like Konfabulator and Sherlock got put in a blender.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  233. Using Virtual PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who need to use some PC programs that don't have Mac ports, there is Virtual PC. Sure, games don't work or run fast but mst software runs reasonably well. It is usable.
    I even read somewhere that MS' Excel actually runs faser in Virtual PC than Excel for Mac does. Though that is probably the only native PC-->Mac port that can make that claim.

  234. Re:Looking forward to Automator, Dashboard, and iC by amichalo · · Score: 1

    The dumb part is that you can't turn them off.

    I guess this is to maintain the "quality" of the app while at the same time, driving CPU sales.

    I agree with you. Let's turn these fatures off for PowerBook users!

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  235. "Virii" by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

    It's "viruses".

    Sheesh.

  236. How do you upgrade a Mac Mini 6"x2.5"? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Its so small it seems quite an ordeal. I like the idea though of a cheaper Mac, but make it big enough to easily upgrade.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:How do you upgrade a Mac Mini 6"x2.5"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can upgrade the RAM. And if you're careful, the laptop HD. And if you can find an optical drive that fits (including the connector), then you could change that too.

      What else would you like to update? The only Macs that have "cards" are the PowerMacs (videocards come to mind).

  237. Re:Looking forward to Automator, Dashboard, and iC by arudloff · · Score: 1
  238. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by copponex · · Score: 1

    Activity Monitor in the Utilites folder. I haven't used vmmap yet to double check.

  239. Apples to Dell comparison by anomaly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love Linux. I've used it on the desktop at home for about 8 years. Linux can't compare with my Powerbook in terms of desktop user experience. My Mac 'just works.'

    The hardware you're talking about has the same capacity hard disk and RAM. There's a 2.3GHz celeron compared to the 1.25 GHz G4. If you're talking about raw GHz, I guess you have Apple beat.

    Video? I'm sure that the included video adapter is superior on the mini. Does your server have a modem? A DVD player, CD burner? Audio in or out? USB? Firewire?

    But Linux has free software! Those free applications push Linux ahead, right?

    Photo management? gPhoto has pretty good camera support - if you're using the right USB drivers. That gets the photos from the camera - now, what about organizing and editing photos? Slideshows with transitions, audio, etc? iPhoto kicks butt here.

    Video editing? First find and configure the firewire card drivers for the chipset you have, then go get what? Cinelerra? Too hard for a linux geek to make work. VirtualDub, Kino? WAAAAY too limited in terms of features and ease of use.

    DVD mastering? Don't get me started...

    Music software? XMMS is pretty handy for playing music, but organizing, sorting? Grip for capturing the data...

    OpenOffice and GAIM on linux are fine tools. NeoOffice and Adium are fine tools on my Mac, and they work almost identically on the Mac.

    The point is that it's POSSIBLE to do these things on linux. On my Mac, it's EASY.

    Write a letter, print it to a remote printer, rip a CD and copy it to a USB or firewire equipped MP3 player, take digital photos, create a slideshow with music, export it to a readily available format (doesn't have to be quicktime, but find something equally easy for the recipient to use.... Compare start-to-finish time on both platforms. My Mac clobbers linux in this.

    Don't get me wrong here I'm a big Linux geek. My Mac makes desktop computing useful and usable.

    Respectfully,
    Anomaly

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
    1. Re:Apples to Dell comparison by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      I think you have a point.
      Nevertheless linux is catching up (slowly but steadily) in some areas, so I want to drop some names...

      Photo management? gPhoto has pretty good camera support - if you're using the right USB drivers. That gets the photos from the camera - now, what about organizing and editing photos? Slideshows with transitions, audio, etc? iPhoto kicks butt here.

      Agree'd, somewhat. But when "slideshows with transitions" and "audio" don't matter (to me they don't) gphoto gets the job done pretty well.

      Video editing? First find and configure the firewire card drivers for the chipset you have, then go get what? Cinelerra? Too hard for a linux geek to make work. VirtualDub, Kino? WAAAAY too limited in terms of features and ease of use.

      You have a point, there appears to be no decent package around.
      Personally I think it's a matter of time until one pops up, though.

      DVD mastering? Don't get me started...

      Another point for you. I've seen some (GUI-)apps in that dept but most were still young. Again, time will fix that - definately.

      Music software? XMMS is pretty handy for playing music, but organizing, sorting? Grip for capturing the data...

      Well, there I must jump in. We have rhythmbox and madman. IHMO both beat itunes hands-down. I'm using madman to feed my ipod - itunes feels crippled in comparison. For ripping just use abcde. You'll never look back.

    2. Re:Apples to Dell comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm. I just bought a Mac Mini (needed something that would run Adobe after effects, wanted to try OS X) and a week later I installed Ubuntu on my old laptop.

      I guess we will just disagree on some things. I can't discuss iPhoto since I don't use it very often, but iMovie vs Kino? Kino wins, hands down, in terms of features. And Kino isn't hard to use. (Kino doesn't support HD video, though, so you have me there. But I don't need HD video, and at this point, neither do most consumers.)

      I don't purchase online music, so Rhythmbox vs iTunes: They're the same. I mean, identical. The only difference I can see is that Rhythmbox will open a separate window to rip a CD. Admittedly, the iTunes online integration is a killer feature for some.

      And all the hardware Just Works on Ubuntu 5.04. NeoOffice won't run the scriptwriting macros I built in OOo. The GIMP Just Works on Ubuntu, meaning I have a decent photo editor (not organizer; editor. I use GIMP to design animated slides that I drop into video with Kino). Plus, I didn't have to install OpenOffice and GIMP as extra components -- Ubuntu installed them by default.

      Can't compare iChat and GAIM, don't use IM.

      And OS X AND Ubuntu AND XP absolutely SUCK at syncing my Palm. This was a pain in the ass to set up on all three operating systems. (I use XP at work.) But I should probably blame Palm here.

      If Linux had a robust motion graphics package, I could have saved $1500 ($500 for the mini, $1000 for After Effects).

      I'm guessing other distributions are maturing in terms of hardware support, too.

      Mac Mini's only killer feature for me is Expose. It's just so wonderfully effective at helping me find an open window. As of tomorrow, you can add Spotlight to that list -- but the next version of Ubuntu will also include integrated search.

      So. I think Mac Mini is a beautiful, powerful device for what I paid for it, and by all means, recommend it for Grandma instead of XP. But Linux is catching up, and very, very quickly. And frankly I think I get better value out-of-the-box with Ubuntu.

    3. Re:Apples to Dell comparison by MonkeySpank · · Score: 1
      We have rhythmbox and madman. IHMO both beat itunes hands-down.
      Kent, rhythmbox is a great start, but it doesn't come close to iTunes for ease of use. You can't even drag-and-drop a bunch of MP3s to create a playlist. And it has almost no out-of-the-box radio stations. And it crashes too easily (e.g. importing an ASF file whilst creating its library...that's probably a GStreamer bug actually). And it has no mini-player option. Having said all that, it's the player I use the most on Linux ;-P
    4. Re:Apples to Dell comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi (Kent@work here),

      yup, rhythmbox has a few shortcomings. But it's under active developement and most flaws will be gone pretty soon (give it 6 months or so).
      I don't understand your point about "out-of-the-box radio stations"? I couldn't care less about presets, it's not hard to find sites that list hundreds of stations in any genre. And usually I only listen to my 3 or 4 favs anyways...

      Well, having said all that, I must repeat that I'm not using rhythmbox anymore but have switched to madman some months ago. Give it a shot.

    5. Re:Apples to Dell comparison by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

      Writing a letter is exactly the same. Open the appliation, write a letter.

      Printing said letter, Control-P versus Comannd-P.

      Rip a CD. Open up Grip and rip it to mp3 or ogg. Open up iTunes and rip it to AAC.

      I don't do any slideshows exported to ogm or avi, but I'm assuming that in fact would take longer. I also have no idea how to do that on a Mac.

      The last one might have me, but there are many things that I can't do on my Mac without PAYING FOR A PROGRAM.

      Free software on a Mac does work well, but sometimes lacks the tight integration with the OS that most Mac users rave about.

      I also have to pay more for most any piece of hardware for a Mac. I can't expand the hardware very easily without buying the horribly expensive G5 series.

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    6. Re:Apples to Dell comparison by anomaly · · Score: 1

      Find print drivers that work for your printer prior to printing - how hard is it to tell how much ink is in the printer? Yes, there are tools that can do that, but it's not standardized or simple.

      Ripping CDs does not take long on Linux - but you DO have to know how to find GRIP and then configure it to use the right encoder to produce the files that you want - knowing the right command line flags because it's not menu-driven.

      Once you've ripped the mp3's, then how do you organize them? iTunes is SIMPLE.

      Exporting the slideshow is trivial on my Mac.

      Mac hardware costs a little more, but not a LOT more. The software that is included with the hardware is worth a lot to me.

      You're right, you have to pay for Mac hardware and software. I call it paying for value.

      My Mac makes it easy to do what I want to do. I love Linux and free software, but it's not trivial to do the things that I want to do with it.

      --
      But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
    7. Re:Apples to Dell comparison by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

      My printer gets configured just fine, and it is as simple to do it as it is to install the programs and drivers I needed for my Canon Pixma ip5000. It takes about 20 minutes to install that. About 5 minutes to setup the printer under CUPS on Core 3.

      Ripping CDs with iTunes makes AAC files. I haven't tried to configure it to do mp3s (not sure if it can or is properly licensed to). With Grip I can encode into whatever format I want, and use those files on my mp3 player. I can't with the Mac.

      Mac hardware is not a little more. My Dell with a 19 inch flat panel was around $509. That is about the cost of the mini. Add another $300 for a flat-panel, and your way out.

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  240. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
    And then do the same on a comparable system at (Best Buy, Fry's, etc) and see what you think.

    Or go to CompUSA and hit both in one store.
    By the way, Fry's sells Macs, and Best Buy is about to start doing so. You can compare in all three stores, not just CompUSA.
    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  241. Apple offers more Open Source unix goodies by Bigbluejerk · · Score: 1

    Has anyone read the Ars Technica review of Tiger by John Siracusa?

    Launchd

    For Tiger, Apple created launchd: one launch daemon to rule them all. Launchd does the job of all of the existing program launching mechanisms, and does it in a way that puts the least possible burden on the programs that it launches. Processes spawned by launchd don't have to worry about "daemonizing" themselves, checking for dependencies, or relaunching or keeping communication handles alive in the case of a crash.

    Launchd can launch programs in response to any of the events listed earlier, and it can do so on behalf of the system or an individual user. It will discover dependencies on its own and launch programs in parallel when possible. This is essential for fast system startup. Mac OS X's older startup items system did the same thing, but it had to be explicitly told the dependencies.

    Launchd supports a messaging protocol to answer questions like, "How many users are connected to this daemon?" and "Have you shut down yet?" Program shutdown is another example of an area where "The Unix Way" is usually deemed "good enough" despite obvious deficiencies. Traditionally, Unix services are shut down by sending a signal to the process, waiting a little while, and then sending a more harsh signal just in case the service refused to shut down. This is barbaric, but necessary because there's no standardized messaging system for Unix daemons. Launchd recognized the need and filled it.

    Apple has developed launchd as an open source project that it hopes will be adopted by the wider Unix community. To the average Unix hacker, launchd probably looks like a reinvention of the wheel. I think it addresses a problem the Unix community doesn't even know that it has. In this way it's much like Mac OS X itself. There was "Unix on the desktop," and then there was Mac OS X. You'd think that alone would have been a big enough wake-up call.

    If I were working on a Unix-based operating system, I'd be borrowing ideas and code from Apple like there's no tomorrow. Apple has certainly been smart enough to pull in the opposite direction, basing a huge part of its OS (particular its server OS) on open source Unix projects. Apple has returned the favor by contributing to many of those projects: FreeBSD, gcc, KHTML/KJS, etc. When Apple comes calling with their own open source Unix creations, I think it's foolish not to pay attention.

    Anyway, enough preaching. What launchd means to Mac OS X is that all the preexisting program launch facilities will slowly be migrated to launchd. This won't happen overnight, or perhaps not even in the next few years, but the groundwork has been laid. There are also plans to extend launchd to handle device events (e.g., plugging in a camera) and to further standardize not just the protocol but the contents of service messages.

    1. Re:Apple offers more Open Source unix goodies by Bigbluejerk · · Score: 1
      The above is actually a quote from the Ars Technica review. I hit "submit" instead of "preview" and Slashdot won't let me edit the orginal post.

      Here's the url for the article:

      http://arstechnica.com/reviews/os/macosx-10.4.ars/
  242. Its not BEEMER asshat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A motorcycle is a beemer.

    A car is a bimmer.

    Yes, I do own one, thanks.

  243. 3 series *is* reliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check CR again. The 3 series has been average to above average in reliability over a period of many years.

  244. Re:A rave review from Mossberg??? how surprising.. by Shag · · Score: 1

    Pogue raving is no suprise either - heck, he writes Mac books.

    Funny you should mention Turrott, though - he apparently gave Tiger a 4/5 rating and has some "Tiger feature of the day" thing going on some site of his. And he claims to have taken a PowerBook with him to WinHEC. :)

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  245. This is why you pirate QT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    No joke.

    QT should be free. MS doesn't charge for WMP. QT might be worth it, but you have to pay extra for MPEG2.

    Ridiculous.

    And they keep updating QT with no consideration for previous licenses. So Apple has essentially said "you're better off pirating".

    I should not have to keep buying QT over and over. Plus, people who are nice enough to give Apple $130 for an OS update should get a QT license for free.

    So Apple is saying "please don't pay, get a keygen. PLEASE!!!!"

  246. Re:Aging Panther Installs will Break Tiger Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I always wipe the drive and do a clean install when doing a major system upgrade. It give me an opportunity to clean house and ensures that I won't inherit any problems from the previous install.

  247. Re:Sure... by zpok · · Score: 1

    Yes, I know. I also know he likes it (but finds it slightly expensive).

    The whole point was: an OS doesn't suck because it doesn't run on AMD and the mac doesn't suck because it doesn't have an AMD processor, regardless of the OS you're running.

    And furthermore, stating that doesn't make you a dribbling fan-boy. At least not in my book.

    More and more you read stuff like "people who use OS such and such are stupid, because it can't make coffee". I just pointed out that yes, it does make coffee, but of another brand and no, people aren't stupid because of their choice of OS or coffee.

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  248. Re:BFD - Apple propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll give you $50 for that useless Mac, Mr. M$ has made me lots of money.

  249. launchd is the shiznit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put a slightly pre-release quality build I got from a torrent site (yeah,yeah, I'm buying it tomorrow night, I just wanted to check it out) on a 1.25GHz Mac mini with 512MB.

    Believe the hype about launchd... I was stunned at how fast that little bastard booted. You barely even see the "Mac OS X" splash screen and progress bar before it's gone and the login screen or desktop appears.

    I'm delighted to hear that Apple will be giving launchd to the FOSS community, because one of my biggest gripes about Linux was how long the systems take to boot up.

  250. One word refutation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NeXT.

  251. performance suggestions by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Informative


    Your experience is out of the oridinary. Here's how MacAddict reviewed Office v.X in 2002--
    The apps install in a minute, they're rock solid, and they're fast. If you need an excuse to move up to Mac OS X, Microsoft Office v. X might just be it.
    Here's Wired's review of Office for Mac OS X--
    ...the Mac version of Office makes the Windows version look like something designed in the last century.
    Since you're using a powerbook, which is what I also am using, I've got two suggestions that might improve your performance in Office-- Install 512mb of ram if you are trying to get by with 256mb. Also, if you've enabled filevault, disable it. I just don't believe your experience is the norm. Hopefully these suggestions will help.

    Seth
    1. Re:performance suggestions by lunadog · · Score: 1

      Thanks.. I will try this..

      Here's hoping!

  252. Ars Technica by podperson · · Score: 1

    Has a far better and more detailed review (warts and all).

    In particular, it looks at UI issues with Spotlight, the implementation of file metadata (think: Copland's any number of forks in a file concept is now working), vast architectural and performance improvements to Quartz 2D, even running in software, etc.

    1. Re:Ars Technica by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      the implementation of file metadata (think: Copland's any number of forks in a file concept is now working)

      Depends on what that Copland concept meant by "fork". Extended attributes are small named chunks of data; they're not arbitrary-size named data streams.

  253. CoreImage can also re-order filters for speed by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1


    CoreImage can also look at what you're doing, and sometimes decide that two filters can be applied simultaneously, instead of applying the first to the whole image, then the second to the whole image.

    That should be faster, because the pixels of the image will only have to be read, processed, and written once, instead of twice.

    This kind of on-the-fly optimization will apply even on G3s without altivec or new graphics cards.

    I expect this depends a great deal on the specific filters involved.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  254. Did you run a clean install with Tiger? by JackAxe · · Score: 1

    That's odd. Mail will quit on me about once every other week if I'm unlucky. I'm still on 10.3, but will be jumping to Tiger this weekend.

    I'm not using SSL though, so I don't have any experience in how it may effect my stability.

  255. Re:IPod hardware quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shhhhh! You might blow the myth that apple hardware is of better quality than the competition!! We've worked hard for years to make people believe that one!

  256. How about "Bumwad"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think "Bumwad" is the best choice of word for BMWs.

  257. GDS also as ha plugin architecture... by StandardsSchmandards · · Score: 1

    GDS also has a plugin architecture with a lot of documentation. Check out http://desktop.google.com/plugins.html for a lot of plugins.

    GDS so far has been extremely fast at indexing new files. It even indexes Outlook email.

    1. Re:GDS also as ha plugin architecture... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Oh ok, I didn't know about that.

      However I doubt that it is as fast as indexing as the file is modified.

  258. He's is right! by JackAxe · · Score: 1

    You can also use "command+option+esc." This is a force-quit, it's kind of like C.A.D.

    You know one person with a Mac. :) Let me guess, he's using either a first rev G4, or Blue&White G3. :) What you have whitnessed is a rarity, unless his Mac is "old," or a lemon. The majority of Macs will maintain themsevles and will not crash when applying a simple patch. This is true for all modern OSX Macintoshes. My PCs run OK, I know my way around them and have used them way longer than Macs, but even with good components, they're still unreliable compared to a Mac and are too easy too break. But this is OS related of course. XP needs help.

    Funny sig BTW, but I use a MX1000 on my G5 and a MX700 on my G4. :) I haven't used a one-button mouse since 1998, so I think I'll probably sprout another finger in the future.

    1. Re:He's is right! by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

      I dont deny that MAC has less bugs than microsoft but it's only because almost nobody uses it so software companies and developpers dont make a lot of software for that particular O.S, you see the same software over and over again, illustrator,quarkexpress,photoshop etc..etc.. The only reason most software works good under MAC is because there is so few of them out there, put it backwards and make MAC the most used O.S and in no time you'll see all kind of shit happening, software crashes and bugs all over the place including viruses, malware and addware. They only have the advantage of being unpopular.

  259. Re:Voice recognition Mod parent up. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
    The grandfather poster was obviously trolling. How could he expect his cheap ass video card to go into such a small form factor.

    External peripherals "are" compatible with the mini.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  260. Re:IPod hardware quality by elemental23 · · Score: 1

    For a good example of this, just look at cars. Someone looking for a quality car would do well to only look at imports and ignore the crap coming out of the US manufacturers.

    --
    I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  261. I had a car like that by OglinTatas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course the average /.'er drives a VW Thing that was hand built by everyone he/she knows, only runs on methanol that he/she makes in the back yard, has the steering wheel on the wrong side, and requires three keys to start.

    It was a used postal jeep, I had rebuilt nearly every part on it. Steering wheel on the wrong side, it started with a screwdriver though (not as secure as the linux analogy you make, so I had to hide an ignition cut out switch--security through obscurity, donchano) I finally got a real job, and bought a vw tdi. Now I burn biodiesel, instead of the methanol you mention.

  262. Why a mini instead of an iBook for vjing? by douglasq · · Score: 1

    I was just curious why the mini would be attractive to a vj when you still need some sort of screen you would need to lug around. Wouldn't an iBook make more sense. I don't vj so, enlighten me.

    --
    "Form should follow function...unless it's just plain ugly."
  263. Re:Which is faster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Apple's marketing department said so, and Apple would *never* rig the tests or fuge the numbers!

  264. Solve by distributing usage guidelines?!?!? by telbij · · Score: 1

    Anyway, to get that functionality on your windows network, turn indexing service on - it's off by default. Then define some usage guidelines and distribute them to your users. The reason they can't all work together in a coherent way is that they don't have a coherent plan. Solving the problem with an index is not solving the problem, it's working around the problem. :)

    So according to you, it's easier and more correct to program your users rather than the operating system? I'm guessing you don't have much in the way of people skills...

  265. Sorry, did mean in Tiger by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I meant to add that was something to be excited about in Tiger - you're right that right now you can't make them and indeed opening a Word documetn that has tables is a horrible mess.

    I'm not sure if the new TextEdit has the other features you were looking for, but it had a few other improvements as well. I would gess the full set (like footnotes) is not there, but you never know...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  266. Re:It is viruses by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

    you would be wrong in this case. I used to believe it was virii but that is a bastarization of latin pluralization and does not follow the common method of plural nouns for words from Latin origin.

  267. Spotlight and SmartFolders look great. by kavi_3 · · Score: 1

    I used to us BeOS on my home system and it had a file system that supported many of the things that Spotlight and SmarFolder seem to do. It is the biggest thing I missed when I had to stop using Be. I can't wait to install Tiger on my Powerbook.

    --
    "Attention Citizens, 2+2 now equals 3.947547175. Please recalibrate your equipment now" --The Computer
  268. Re:So what's really new?? by rwrife · · Score: 1

    And how can Apple get away with bundling all of these "extra" applications. They're using their monopoly of the PPC desktop to push their products like Quicktime, Stock Ticker, Address Book, & iSync which they are using to squeeze the small time software developers/vendors out of the PPC market. Once they've run their competition out of business, they'll start to add features like "Buy Printing Supplies" and force users to spend even more money on Apple products.

  269. Speaking for many of us by lullabud · · Score: 1

    I'm not the only person I know who has started using OS X because of these exact reasons. It's always fantastic to hear people reiterating my thoughts, and giving them great analogies like that. It's awesome, and it's so true. I read another great quote in this same topic that pretty much said "you can't build a PC cheaper unless your time is worthless." I'm one of those guys who bought a Mac so that I wouldn't have to spend so much time in front of my computer. I'm the guy with the BMW, so to speak, who wants to go out and spend time on other things and not even think about the car. I did my time with that. I compiled my custom kernels. I re-installed windows a billion times. I ordered all those cutting-edge parts and tweaked my bios. OC'd my cpu. Did software raid. Lost tons of data. Spent lots of money. Stayed up late at night. I'm done with it, now that I want a computer that I don't have to think about I use my Mac. Anybody who wants to keep using Windows, getting viruses, tweaking kernels, drivers, whatever... they can have it, and I hope they enjoy it. I don't. I did, but I don't anymore. OS X has blended all my needs, and it's worth my money so that I can close up my laptop and go hiking instead of watching the sun set from inside my house while my computer reboots again.

  270. Video Editing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Avidemux. Works great for me.

    Also, Kino, and about a billion others.

  271. Archives by atverd · · Score: 1

    And it looks like it doesn't support indexing for compressed files. I tried zip and gzip. For some reason I thought this should work. Also it doesn't like plain-text files without extension or with unknown extension, but assigning TEXT type with SetFile or renaming to *.txt helps and now I've finally managed to index my precious man pages. "mdfind" instead of "apropos" in command line - ah, what a fun! :)

  272. not a ripoff by hayne · · Score: 1
    I think it's lame that the 2 hit new features are shameless ripoffs of existing shareware apps. Dashboard is to Konfabulator as Spotlight is to Launchbar. They may have some improvement over the original, but who could say with a straight face that they didn't get the idea from these shareware developers?
    Apple didn't ripoff those shareware developers. The Dashboard vs Konfabulator issue has been discussed at length in two articles at Daring Fireball:
    1
    2
    One important point: ideas by themselves aren't worth all that much - implementations are what count.
  273. ...or join the Campaign to get Apple to ship... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...ibFirebird with OS X?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  274. I'm waiting and waiting and waiting to try Mac OS by mattw_watson · · Score: 1

    A Warning to all prospective Mac purchasers in Australia!!!

    The software seems fantastic, way superior to what I'm used to out of XP, the hardware is attractive and (I hope) removes all the bizarre hardware and driver incompatabilities I struggle with, but the company, Apple, seems incapable of helping itself out.

    I ordered a BTO mac mini (1.4GHz, Airport, Superdrive) on Feb 12. 10 weeks later I was told I may have to wait another 3-4 months to get my order!! I settled instead for a stock 1.4GHz (one of 6 to arrive in Australia that week), got it home, excitedly watched it got through the first-boot setup, then the screen went blank - now power, no response, no sound.

    Hoping (and praying) it was the power supply and easily replaced, I returned to the store, but no such luck, it's dead. Since it was within a week, I'm entitled to a new machine, but hey, that could take another 4-6 weeks to turn up, even fast-tracked with Apple.

    So it's in for repair. How many parts are they going to have available considering they haven't got any machines?

    I'm amazed that apple can shoot themselves in the foot so. I was told they have 3000 orders for Mac Minis outstanding in Australia and only 6 Arrived last week. The BTO Dell I ordered a month ago took 5 working days to arrive!

  275. Re:BFD - Apple propaganda by bwags · · Score: 1

    It has 512Megs and still sucks. Everything about it is slow. It opens windows slow, it starts up slow, and runs slow. But actually now it just sits there turned off. No one is interested. Truth hurts.

  276. Is Spotlight Like Quicksilver by Lord+of+the+Fries · · Score: 1

    From what I've read/seen about Spotlight, it sounds like an integrated version of the addon "Quicksilver". Is this the case?

    --
    One man's pink plane is another man's blue plane.
  277. Re:Looking forward to Automator, Dashboard, and iC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a table at the bottom of the info page about ichat AV. Note that Any G4 system can initiate a 1:1 video, or participate in a 4-person video chat. 10 person audio chat? At work, having more than 3 people call into and participate in meetings is difficult to track.

    http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/ichat/

    (Sorry about the AC post--I moderated a couple posts on this topic.)

  278. Re:BFD - Apple propaganda by bwags · · Score: 1

    To be fair, I booted up the computer to see the actual specs. It is running 10.3.7 and has 640Megs of ram. There is about 10gigs of space left on the HD. Tiger-still not interested.

  279. Part of the Ars article was pulled offline!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So I was blissfully reading John Siracusa's (VERY in-depth) article, got past the section on "Video in Tiger", into the following section on Dashboard. I followed a link from there to Apple's website, perused what I wanted to see, then hit the "back" button... and ended up at a blank page. I hit the "back" button again, and found myself at the "Video in Tiger" page. Where the "next" link had been at the bottom of the page, was a "discuss" link in its place.

    I guess there must be a "part 2" of the review coming along at some point.

  280. I {heart} hosts lists... by burning_plastic · · Score: 1


    The title says it all ;->

    (and a little CSS ad-blocking as a back-up_

    ------

    All Your Fish Are Belong To Us

  281. Re:So what's really new?? by tim1724 · · Score: 1

    the biggest things that have changed in the OS are really below the surface.

    for the developer, I think CoreData, CoreImage, CoreVideo...

    the thing there is that when developers take advantage of this, you will need to upgrade to use the neat new features in those new applications that take advantage of them.

    Yes, I think we're going to see a lot of shareware and freeware apps using these new APIs. Commercial software will take a bit longer, depending on the rate of Tiger adoption (companies don't want to lose out on sales due to users still using old versions of the OS) but it looks to me like the Tiger adoption rate will be pretty good.

    CoreAudio, from panther, made creating audio plug-ins (for logic, live, etc.) relatively easy to build functions that work in a variety of applications as they are based on the architecture of the OS rather than the plug-in architecture of a particular application. (apologies for the sentence structure...)

    CoreAudio has been around since before Panther, but Panther is when it really became polished. (And received a lot of attention thanks to the high-profile applications such as GarageBand which started using it after Panther's release.)

    I would love to see the ability to create image filters that could be used in a variety of manipulation programs, ( btw, is the CoreSet available to darwin?) and have it then be possible to generate a simple image manipulation framework that relied entirely on CoreImage/Video units.

    Image Units are just so cool that I'm sure we're going to see a ton of them. Someone needs to write a Photoshop plugin which allows one to use IUs in apps which use the Photoshop API. (I don't think the reverse is possible, as IUs have to be implemented in a fragment language so they can be executed on the GPU.)

    Prepare yourself for the flood of shareware image editing apps using Core Image. Core Image is one of those things which is going to help drive the users to upgrade. (Even if they don't know it yet.)

    I really like the way Apple is building these generic frameworks with good plugin support. It makes developing cool and useful applications much easier, and perhaps more importantly avoids the problem of application-specific plugin formats.. It also helps Apple, as it means more plugins which work in their software (such as Audio Units for GarageBand).

    --
    -- Tim Buchheim
  282. Don't see that here by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I just tried with TextEdit - I typed a few lines, hit Comamnd-Q t quit - the dialoge asking if I want to save comes up. I can then switch between Safari and TextEdit with no trouble - via the dock or just clicking on Windows.

    I could have sworn it has always worked that way, what version of the OS do you have? Perhaps it was addresses in the recent 10.3.9 update?

    I suppose it could behave badly with other apps, but that seems pretty odd... perhaps it's some kind of wierd configuration issue? I'll have to try on my laptop as well.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Don't see that here by philml · · Score: 1

      Well I've got Tiger now and can't get it to repeat...

  283. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by Apotsy · · Score: 1

    In Activity Monitory, go to "View"->"Columns" and enable all the different columns having to do with memory. "Private Memory" (a.k.a. RPVT) is the one that really matters, as that's how much non-shared memory each process is consuming.

  284. Underestimated by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Can microsoft's indexing service find active photoshop layers? Window names?

  285. GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    9. GNU/Linux
    You have heard of this word 'shower' and seen one of these appliances one or two times but as yet have never used one. You call Apple users gay while only having male aquaintances yourself. You were beaten up at school and in all honesty you know you deserved it. You understand memory paging and can discuss the pros and cons of RISC v CISC but do not know how to change a car tyre. You believe every word should be prefixed with "GNU/", "G" or "K" and be a recursive acronym - that would be so teh cool! You mistakenly think your mother loves you.

    1. Re:GNU/Linux by sv0f · · Score: 1

      Get an account and get some Karma.

      Your comic brilliance should not wasted here below everyone's threshold.

  286. So what should I do? Upgrade or archive/install by wandazulu · · Score: 1

    I have a dual g5 that has been rock solid since day 1, so I've never reinstalled panther. I can't really wipe-n-install because I've got several user accounts for my family/friends that would need to be put somewhere before wiping, plus reinstalling programs, etc. That would suck.

    So should I upgrade straight, or use archive-n-install? I get the gist of what archive-n-install does, but is it a real "new" installation with all your programs/accounts preserved?

  287. G3 systems too slow for Tiger? by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    I'm doubtful Tiger out-of-the-box will run as well as Panther on my 700 mhz iBook.

    Mossberg seems to imply as much in his complaints about slowdowns, adding:

    "Apple acknowledges it will need to tweak Tiger to eliminate the delays, and it promises to address the problem within a few months. It might be wise for users with older, slower Mac models to wait until then to upgrade to Tiger."

    Spotlight would help me enormously, but I'm not willing to run key tasks slower in exchange for it (and especially not for "a few months"). Anyone else going to run Tiger on a G3 system?

  288. Dr Seus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    or

    ... everyone else scream, as they gobble the [cock] cream.
    Is this a mac fanboi's dream?
    So it would seem!

  289. Re:So what's really new?? by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    As a hobby, I'm writing a game and so the new dev tools and APIs are going to be great.

    Core Image even has an application (for me) in generating maps for the RPG I'm working on. I need to run a very large version of a blur filter on the interpolated map data, to smooth out jagged features.

    Core Image to the rescue!

  290. So... by MattHaffner · · Score: 1

    ...it's no worse than any other platform. Because aside from OS X, there isn't a modern OS whose apps are encouraged to have UI consistancy.

    And don't fool yourself that M$ Office for OS X is one of those apps. It might look pretty Aquafied, but It still suffers from the inability or unwillingness to use OS X functionality like it was intended. When average-joe free/shareware developer seems to have no trouble utilizing the great dev features included for free.

    Anyway... it's a pretty lame reason not to try OS X out or to try OO out--one way or another. And now we have Pages & Keynote as a third alternative.

    1. Re:So... by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      Oh, I despise Office.

      But still - open office feels kind of nasty to use on OS X, and although Office is pretty bad, it at least presents users with normal open and save dialog boxes.

      OO you suddenly have your menus in the window and a bunch of other windows-y behaviors that feel quite out of place. I use OO and gnumeric on OS X myself, but I don't really feel like recomending them to my dad.

  291. Hate to break it to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but you are talking to a troll. This person does not work for Apple, yet all of the Apple faithful listen to him and mod him up as though he did--without the slightest shred of evidence that he is who he says he is.

    Seriously, someone like him posting some of the things he has posted here on /. (that are factually *wrong*) would have been tracked down and seriously reprimanded at the very least and fired if he continued to carry on like he does.

  292. Sorry to beat this dead horse, but... by anomaly · · Score: 1

    Printer installation and queue management are EASIER under OS X and Windows XP than under Linux. Hands down.

    Interestingly, when I enabled 128 bit WEP at home, linux was easier than OS X, but that is definitely the exception.

    iTunes produces mp3's just fine. All of my music is in mp3 format. Some ripped with grip, most ripped with iTunes. If you don't like mp3, aiff, wav or AAC, find plugins that support LAME, add plugins for ogg or whatever formats you want. There's no reason to think that you couldn't use iTunes to rip the music and then copy it to your mp3 player. Of course, Apple's mp3 player does not support ogg, and apparently never will.

    WRT price comparison, your Dell is missing a BUNCH of hardware that the mini includes. Equip your Dell with similar interfaces, and the cost of the Dell will be close to the mini.

    While I agree that the Gimp is a great image editor, how easy is something as simple as redeye correction? VERY possible, but again, iPhoto makes it trivial. For that matter, it's trivial using Picasa on Windows.

    What about photo collection management? Export to webpage? Creation of slideshows with music? iPhoto makes that easy. Import of photo collections to home movie editing tools? DVD Mastering? All reasonably easy on my Mac. All conceptually possible on linux but non-trivial.

    Please don't misunderstand. I love Linux. I'm wearing a Tux shirt to work at my Fortune 500 company as I post this. (Something that doesn't quite fit with our corporate culture, if you know what I mean.)

    I'm at a point in my life where my time matters to me - it's fun to tinker with things, and linux makes that easy and possible. Mac OS X/iLife is BETTER at a lot of common things, and that makes it worth paying for.

    Respectfully,
    Anomaly

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
  293. Oh well! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    At least it's gone. That;s just the sort of thing that Windows does to me all the time I can't tolerate!

    Enjoy Tiger, I'm installing today myself.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  294. not for most sp2+firewall by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    but if you upgrade to sp2 and turn the firewall came with sp2 on, it doesn't function any more for most computers I worked with. There was one working case I met.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    1. Re:not for most sp2+firewall by gyg · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that external USB hard drives have massive issues with sp2. If I weren't an ODBC addict (SQL queries from a bunch of arbitrary rectangular regions in Excel into another spot in the same Excel file are just cool), I'd switch to oSX right away...

  295. There is "no" os x light? by bani · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wrong.

    Apple has two OS product lines. Targeted differently and priced differently.

    OS X - $129 (equivalent I guess, to XP Home)
    OS X Server - $499 (equivalent to XP Pro).

    So really, apple is doing exactly the same thing microsoft is doing.

  296. Re: XGrid by bani · · Score: 1

    hopefully xcode is no longer the crashy pile of doggie poo it is in panther. hopefully they also improved the UI -- xcode is the most unpleasant IDE i've ever used -- it's worse than kdevelop, and that takes real talent.

  297. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by bani · · Score: 1

    You can put together a dual opteron pretty cheaply. Opteron 250's (2.4ghz smp) are $700 ea. and a good dual opteron mobo will run you $300. If you're willing to do with Opteron 244's (1.8ghz smp) those are $200 ea.

    A case + PS will run you $100 max. The rest you get to blow on memory/disks/etc.

    It's pretty easy to see you can make a rather hefty machine for $2500 with dual 1800 opterons.

    Check out newegg. As a mac user you're simply not used to reasonable prices for hardware. :-)

  298. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    Likewise if you're willing to go with dual 1.8GHz G5s (Apple has a sale section on their store site), you only need to shell out $1,699.

    And a $100 case doesn't do the PowerMac case justice; it's akin to a $200 aluminum Lian case. $900 for the case, mobo, and CPUs alone, an additional $300 for basic ram, hard drive, and video card, brings you up to a bare $1200. The additional difference in price is not nearly as outrageous as a $2,500 system would be.

  299. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by bani · · Score: 1

    I will point out ISPs hate the powermac cases. You can't stack them like you can PCs (they are extremely unstable if you try). In fact with apple, you don't get a choice in the matter. It's dictated for you. Don't like the case? Want a rack case instead? Tough noogies.

    Also, if you're really audacious you can build a quad opteron for under $2500. Does apple even offer a quad CPU system?

  300. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    1: So? How are any of your points relevant to the discussion?

    2: If you want a rackmount case, Apple does sell a rackmount dual G5

    3: You keep comparing 'build' to 'buy'. I suspect even if Apple did offer a quad CPU system, you wouldn't 'buy' because you 'build'.

  301. Re:Poor Memory Handling? by bani · · Score: 1

    1. They're as relevant as yours were.

    2. And what is the price differential vs a non-rackmount dual G5?

    3. Depends on if it was cost competetive or not. I'm actually architecture-agnostic. price/performance is whats important to me, if apple can provide a cost competitive quad cpu system, i'll buy one.