Slashdot Mirror


Attacks On US Continued Reports

I'm still having problems getting news from most normal sites, and we are just barely holding up. Both world trade towers have collapsed after hijaacked planes crashed into them. New Yorkers are asked to give blood. Pentagon has collapsed after similiar crash. A pilot of another hijaacked plane crashed in a PA field rather then hitting another target in Pitt (unconfirmed). Military is at the highest alert. US Embassy in Oslo evacuated, all israeli embassies evacuated. 2 Flights to LAX lost radio contact. 3 other planes down. London evacuating. Camp David crash is false. Bin Laden threatened about 2 months ago. Many many many dead. Many other cities evacuating and shutting down.

808 comments

  1. CNN Slowly Coming Back by bahtama · · Score: 5, Informative
    This may have been already posted, but CNN is slowly making its way back online, just give it some time to load, it is still very sporadic. Although the BBC [bbc.co.uk] is the best one for news so far.

    http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/worldtrade.crash/ index.html [cnn.com]

    Here it is from CNN, only a synopsis right now.

    NEW YORK (CNN) -- Terrorists struck the United States Tuesday morning in harrowing, widespread attacks that included at least three commercial jet crashes into significant buildings.

    In the first attack, a plane smashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center in Manhattan shortly before 9 a.m., followed by another plane into the second tower about 20 minutes later. Both towers later collapsed. Sources told CNN that one of the planes was an American Airlines Boeing 767 that had been hijacked after take-off from Boston.

    About an hour later, a plane crashed into the Pentagon in Washington, part of which later collapsed.

    Sources say a second plane was heading toward the Pentagon; F-16 jets were in the air monitoring it.

    The Pentagon, the White House, the State Department, the Justice Department, the Capitol, the CIA and all other government buildings in Washington evacuated.

    In the first ever national ground stop of aircraft, all flights nationwide have been stopped at their departure airports.

    All international flights were diverted to Canada.

    Israel has evacuated all its missions around the world.

    President Bush cancelled an appearance in Florida to return to Washington, calling the crashes "apparent terrorist attacks" and "a national tragedy."

    In Chicago, the Sears Tower was evacuated; United Nations in New York evacuated.

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta was evacuated.

    The New York Port Authority said it had closed all bridges and tunnels into the city.

    New York's Bellevue Hospital was designated command central for handling the catastrophe. Several hospitals have already reported receiving victims with burns and head injuries.

    Large plane crashed 80 miles south of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, but it was unknown if this crash was connected to terrorist attacks.

    U.S. stock markets were closed after the New York attacks.

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

    1. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1, Troll

      Actually, there were 3 planes hitting the towers. The third plane to hit the second tower low is what caused that tower to collapse. I'm not sure what caused the collapse of the other tower.

    2. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The plane in PA was hijacked, someone with a cellphone on the plane called 911... today's date

    3. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way was there a third plane. The collapse was caused by secondary explosions caused by fires spreading in the towers coupled with structural stress. The buildings needed to be complete simply to hold up their enormous weight. With gaping holes in them, naturally they would collapse as stress broke supports. Don't rumormonger, have facts.

    4. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by Bistromat · · Score: 1

      you're wrong, i'm sorry. i watched the tower collapse. there were only 2 aircraft.

    5. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by rw2 · · Score: 2

      We're covering this on Poliglut at this
      link. Photos and links being updated every few minutes.

    6. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      This is very very bad. Terrorists warnings were issued last week th the state department. This is tragic and very sad.

      The country is executing a full scale evacuation NATIONAL emergency plan. This is without a doubt the worst terrorist incident ever.

      I don't care what anyone says to me. There is no understanding or sympathizing with any group for this. There is no need for terrorism like this to get a point across. I don't give a fuck how much your people have suffered, even americans dont deserve this for a moment. (This is just a general rant BTW).

      Anyways.. if I see anothe rperson saying we had this coming I will be very sad.

      Jeremy

    7. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      Seconded. This type of massacre is not the way to earn my sympathy or catch my ear. I will fully support any US retaliation in regards to this matter, which will hopefully involve a US special forces raid and the responsible parties rotting away in prison until they die.

      There is no excuse for the cold-blooded murder of thousands of innocent, ignorant people. You can be sure many of the dead did not even know why they were going to die. Senseless slaughter only fills me with rage towards the murderers.

    8. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Daily Telegraph in London is still up:

      "THOUSANDS are feared dead after terrorists launched an astonishing and brutal attack on America, demolishing the twin towers of New York's World Trade Centre and striking at the heart of the US military machine."

    9. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by dongkiru · · Score: 1

      The news I heard on the way to work said that the fire chief in NY "believes" that the second explosion in the second building was caused by a bomb that was placed there before. He also "believes" that there was a bomb on the first plane that also exploded shortly after colliding with the first building.

      They say many firefighters were lost in the second explosion.

      The person in charge of the Trade Center said that there's usually about 10,000 people in each tower around the time the first plane hit. How long did it take before the buildings collapsed?

    10. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend and I are trying to post as much as we can on out own site: downside. I suggest other like minded individuals cross post the news onto their sites, as many of the recognised sites aren't holding up to well.

      Cheers,

      Nils and Greg

    11. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by FFFish · · Score: 2

      First plane: American Airlines, Flight 11, Boston=>LA, 92 on board.

      Second: UA, 175, Boston=>LA, ?.

      Third (Pentagon): AA, 77, Dulles=>LA, 64.

      Four: UA, 93, Newark=>SF, ?.

      Five: UA, Camp David.

      Six: (PA crash),

      Seven: (CO crash?), UA?, 175, =>LA?

      Many planes still in the air, none currently threatened.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    12. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

      This type of massacre is not the way to earn my sympathy or catch my ear.

      Exactly. Even if the group behind this ever had a chance of making friendly with the US, they have lost that chance now. They've gained nothing but the hatred of the American people. They've raillied (american) public support for military action against themselves, something that once would have been difficult.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    13. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by thetman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      where did you hear this? do you have a link?

    14. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by mpe · · Score: 2

      Actually, there were 3 planes hitting the towers. The third plane to hit the second tower low is what caused that tower to collapse. I'm not sure what caused the collapse of the other tower.

      No 3rd plane. Both towers appear to have collapsed in the same way. Weakening of the structure over several floors due to impact and fire, these floors collapse, resulting in the top of the building crushing the remainder of the structure.

    15. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by ReTay · · Score: 1

      It was on CNN today. I am monitoring TV and the statement matched that exactly. The passanger locked himself in a bathroom and dialed 911.

    16. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      Saw the same report on one of the networks just a moment ago (either Jennings or Brokaw)

      Amid all of the emotions I've had all day about this, the thought of some dude locking himself in the lav to call 911 on his cell just struck me strangely funny. No, I don't think it is funny in the least that a hundred or so people died in that crash (as well as the probably tens of thousands in the WTC), just the mental image of some paniced yuppie in a suit in the toilet on his cellphone during his last moments on earth ...

    17. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by mgblst · · Score: 1

      you are an idiot. There is no excuse for these acts of terrorism, but dont you think that this is the last straw for these people. The ones who did this are probable sick of being ignored while you drink you coffee, play on your computer. They are no longer trying to get your attention. They are blaming you for ignoring their plight.

      Your lack of ability to understand the real situation is perhaps understandable given the attrocities done today, but many more people have died, but they are not americans, so i guess they dont count as much!

    18. Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bin Ladens days r numbered

  2. DFLP claim false by merlin_jim · · Score: 2, Informative

    DFLP has said that they are not responsible. The TV station confirmed that the call they received this morning was anonymous. High level DFLP officials are in contact with the US gov't, and according to ABC are offering to cooperate fully.

    --
    I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    1. Re:DFLP claim false by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the anti-MS league... well they needed to do something.. .Bush wasnt going to do anything the PA plane was supposed to land on Redmond. think it blue screened in mid air

    2. Re:DFLP claim false by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mabe it was the anti dcma people? From what i can see, while i am very sorry for the loss of innocent life. i have absolutly no pity for the US as a whole.. US has been bulling people around for most of existance, DCMA, Canadian softwood tarrif(this put me out of work),etc,etc,etc.. im personally surprised that it took so long for somone for finally whoop their ass. they are simply getting what they deserve.. a proverb i think would fit well here is a nail standing up will eventualy get hammered down.. or keep sticking you neck out you will get your head cut off.

  3. a meta slashdotting! by Karmageddon · · Score: 3, Funny
    Update We're having server problems. Sorry.

    I think you're being slashdotted :)

  4. say goodbye to civil liberties.... by isotope23 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    wanna bet we get a suspension of our
    "inalienable" rights?????

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    1. Re:say goodbye to civil liberties.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And rightly so. The rights are not inalienable but are subject to the good of the whole. So long as the reasons are rational, I'm personally willing to give up my rights in periods of crisis. It'd be bullshit if this was some concocted crisis, but I doubt even a halfwitted goth kid could deny that this is some serious bad mojo. The goal of society is to protect the people first, to protect your rights second.

      -Exitus Acta Probate, Pax Paritur-

    2. Re:say goodbye to civil liberties.... by syphax08 · · Score: 1

      this is neither the time nor the place, and your selfishness is disgusting.

    3. Re:say goodbye to civil liberties.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this is even a greater fear than terrorist bombs. Certainly, actions taken to ensure security at this moment are all welcome and appropriate. But, recent history has shown that each time something like this happens we also loose a little more freedom permanantly. We loose freedom to travel without "showing papers", we loose freedoms to communicate unobserved, we loose freedom promised in the Constitution.

      Let's hope that cooler heads prevail and this isn't the end of freedom in the U.S.

      cryotek

    4. Re:say goodbye to civil liberties.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up you stupid turd... a national crisis warrants protection of the population. I for one will be happy if you can't travel without papers for the time being...

    5. Re:say goodbye to civil liberties.... by glitch! · · Score: 2, Funny

      wanna bet we get a suspension of our "inalienable" rights?????

      I think the solution to this kind of attack is to short-circuit the kidnap/hijack attempt before it gets going. Some years ago, I have resolved to practice what I preach.

      I am not in the practice of picking up hitchhikers, but if I did, and he threatened me, I have resolved to harm him permanently. Preferably with less harm to me, but if I have to hit a concrete overpass column at 80 mph, so be it.

      While the danger of a hijacking is exceedingly small, I am a pilot, and would sooner crash into a hill or lake than allow someone to force me to harm even more people.

      I have told my wife that if I am ever kidnapped, or held with threat of violence (same thing, I guess), she should assume I will not survive the incident, and concentrate on killing the kidnappers. Call in the snipers. And if I am not bound and gagged, I will be the loudest one there, shouting "KILL THEM! KILL THEM!".

      Kidnappers, terrorists, and the like only succeed because of the miserable cowards negotiate with them, and allow them to use violence as if it were currency.

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    6. Re:say goodbye to civil liberties.... by fnorgby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "this is neither the time nor the place, and your selfishness is disgusting."

      Your obtuseness is even more disgusting. Compromising our way of life, which our government has shown its eagerness to perpetrate upon us, is just what terrorists want to have happen.

      It's perfectly reasonable to be shocked and horrified at the tragedy and STILL REMAIN VIGILANT against further government intrusion.

      Do not presume to tell me when I can and cannot protect my rights.

    7. Re:say goodbye to civil liberties.... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      wanna bet we get a suspension of our
      "inalienable" rights?????


      "Inalienable" means that these rights cannot _legitimately_ be taken away; any restriction on these rights is by definition illegitimate, and resistance to their limitation is legitimate. It is the natural created order of things. (Practically speaking, if a government takes away your rights, they're gone, kiss your bum goodbye!) This was the moral justification for rebellion against England in 1776.


      But yes, we will probably find some more restrictions of our liberties, and an increase in our overseas meddling. All lovers of liberty should be concerned (it is not selfish to be so concerned). War is the health of the state, and the state just got a boost.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    8. Re:say goodbye to civil liberties.... by isotope23 · · Score: 1

      Gee, sounds like you would have fit right
      in with the sheep in Nazi germany.......

      "Papieren Bitte!"

      Once this kind of crap starts, IT WILL NEVER
      stop.......

      --
      Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    9. Re:say goodbye to civil liberties.... by mccready · · Score: 1
      While the danger of a hijacking is exceedingly small, I am a pilot, and would sooner crash into a hill or lake than allow someone to force me to harm even more people.


      You seem to imply that the airline pilots were in control of the airplanes that crashed into the world trade center and pentagon. At best, they were probably asked to fly to the new york airport and then moved to the back of the plane or executed, at which point the terrorists would have taken over and flown by sight. Assuming the pentagon was hit by a dulles flight, you could probably navigate by sight immediately after takeoff.

      Flying a plane you don't intend to land really isn't hard at all.
    10. Re:say goodbye to civil liberties.... by davecb · · Score: 1
      Actually I expect the opposite: same kind of reaction as in Canada after the October Crisis of 1970 or in the the U.S. after the last several wars.

      Our American Cousins have a tradition of taking action, solving their problems and then putting their lives and country back together. It might have to do with their first president rejecting the crown and going home after the revolutionary war...

      --dave
      [Canada declared martial law in October 1970 after an internal terrorist attack on Pierre Laporte, Quebec's labour and immigration minister and James Cross, Britain's trade commissioner. About a month later, those who had kidnapped and killed Laporte were arrested, and the innocent victims of the martial law period were reimbursed.

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
  5. over here by psych031337 · · Score: 5, Informative

    We (members of the german army) have been put on alert, people are being revoked from holiday, all system/material checked, no talk policy.

    --
    +++ath0
    1. Re:over here by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 4, Funny

      But typing is ok, it seems? :)

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    2. Re:over here by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      no talk policy



      So of course I jumped up and posted it on slashdot!

    3. Re:over here by psych031337 · · Score: 1

      But typing is ok, it seems? :)


      The facts of alerting, holiday revoking and that is public. The no talk policy is on what material with what personnel and equipment is going where to accomplish what.

      You can't hide an army in high alert. But you can hide their primary goals and targets, and I am not going to go deeper on this.

      We we're allowed to call family to inform them about not coming home. The comment post I did was the digital equivalent of that.
      --
      +++ath0
    4. Re:over here by Sixpack · · Score: 1

      I've heard from anonymous sources that we're at atleast Defcon 3 right now.

    5. Re:over here by nwetters · · Score: 1

      All UK Government facilities have gone to 'Orange'.

    6. Re:over here by cyberdonny · · Score: 2

      Well, the Defense Minister does it too, so where's the problem?

  6. American Airlines confirms 2 planes lost by Randy+Rathbun · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is what is on their webpage:

    AMERICAN CONFIRMS TWO AIRCRAFT LOST

    FORT WORTH, Texas ? American Airlines confirmed today that it lost two aircraft in tragic incidents this morning. American said the flights were Flight 11, a Boeing 767 en route from Boston to Los Angeles with 81 passengers, nine flight attendants and two pilots; and Flight 77, a Boeing 757 operating from Washington Dulles to Los Angeles with 58 passengers, four flight attendants and two pilots.

    Because of the heightened security due to the nature of today?s events, American said it is working closely with U.S. government authorities and will not release more information at this time.

    The government has shut down the entire air traffic system in the United States. American, TWA and American Eagle will not operate.

    "We are horrified by these tragic events," said Donald J. Carty, chairman and CEO of American Airlines. "Our thoughts and prayers go out to the families of all involved."

    Media calls should be directed to the FBI. Customers who wish to receive information about relatives should call American?s response number at 1-800-245-0999.

    Updated information about this morning's incident in New York will be available here as soon as it is verified. Check back frequently and refresh your browser often to make sure you have the most current information.

  7. Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by weslocke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Granted exploding planes aren't exactly the best transport system for biological agents, but with the number of people compressed into relatively small places, a good number of which will soon be travelling back to their home areas soon...

    The possibilty of secondary attacks to that end are just frightening as hell.

    --

    'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    1. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by isotope23 · · Score: 1

      I have been wondering the same thing,

      if they were "smart" terrorists a little anthrax
      in NY would go a long way......

      --
      Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    2. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      When the first tower went down, it was unclear at first what happened.... All you could see was a cloud... that was what I feared it was a massive boi/chem cloud. It looks like it was just dust and debries from the tower collapsing now, but still, it's a real fear. I'm not far from there now in New Jersey...

    3. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by mokyar · · Score: 1

      Negative...
      CNN homepage says
      The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta was evacuated. CDC was preparing terrorism teams in case they become necessary.

    4. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not really, they would have used it instead, it would be much more devastating. They are after terror and trying to send a message that we are vulnerable. We have a cure for anthrax, although not enough to go around yet.

      More attacks are certainly possible... we have to bury these people. I don't even care if a specific terrorist group claims they are not responsible.... that is still a terrorist group with the option open to them. We can't let this stand.

      AE

    5. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by weslocke · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Currently there is no evidence of biological weapons. That's also from the CDC in Atlanta who are operating from quite a distance initially, and at a definite time loss in getting to the site.

      I was more thinking of a secondary 'payload' used to attack the inevitable crowd that tries to get as close as possible to the tragedy sites. After all, short of New Years Eve how would you get that many people clustered together?

      Just paranoia I fully imagine. But The Stand left an impression, I'm just saying.

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    6. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my first thought, actually. First news I heard of the disaster was that paper from the towers was being found three miles away from the towers. Three miles! Thats just blast dispersion...add in the fact that everyone who was in the area will soon be in a hospital, around others, being shuttled around.

      I almost retched when I realized how serious this shit would be if the terrorists were smart. And yes, they're after terror. I'd personally be scared if I started coughing up bits of my lungs.

      -Exitus Acta Probate, Pax Paritur-

    7. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
      Absolutely.

      I live in a place of significance to the US's position in the world (Silicon Valley) where there aren't many big targets.

      Think like a terrorist for a minute, and ask yourself how you would attack the SV if you wanted to.

      I'd have stayed home today, but I don't know where I'd go to be safe...

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    8. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by haizi_23 · · Score: 1

      i almost wretched when i watched the second building collapse on tv, and then looked out the window (i'm near astor place in manhattan) and saw it vanish in a cloud of smoke. my first thought was: if that was a nuke, we'll all be melting in a few minutes.

    9. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by prsabc · · Score: 1

      "Smart"? Hopefully the terrorist had half a brain and realized the extinction of the human race or something that would kill near the equivilant of WWI is not a good agenda...

    10. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      It really did seem like something out of DeLillo's _White Noise_.

      Someone on ABC made the stupidly obvious point about this being a suicide mission.

      --
      Dan
    11. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by Tool+Man · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't think that the bio/chem attacks are too likely for this sort of scenario. Think about it... terrorism is a tool of the weak, and the media plays a huge part. Sort of the "if a tree falls in the forest" sort of thing, so video impact is everything. You can't beat having one plane hit, so that everyone is watching when the second one comes in. Stealthy attacks can't compare.

    12. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by collar · · Score: 1

      I wouldnt be worried about that, simply because it is hard enough to bring the necessary equipment on board a plane to try and hijack it, let alone bring chemical weapons as well. Any biological agent of a useful size to cause infection would likely be detected by sniffer dogs and other protections at the airport.

      I dont think the terrorists would take the additional risk, epecially since their actions have unfortunately proved the devastation that can be caused by flying a commercial airline flight into buildings.

    13. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by TCaptain · · Score: 1

      If these people had even HALF of a functionning brain they wouldn't have tried something like this...



      I despair that there are people out there who can think acts like these are a GOOD thing. This is just sick

      --
      "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
    14. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

      Think like a terrorist for a minute, and ask yourself how you would attack the SV if you wanted to

      With an EMP device of some sort I'd imagine.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    15. Re:Anyone else worried about biological/viral? by dragonfly_blue · · Score: 1

      Except Anthrax isn't communicable from human-to-human, at least not through the respiratory system.

      --
      Free music from Jack Merlot.
  8. latest by forsaken33 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Latest on the news is that the Palestinians have condemmned the attack, attention has shifted to Bin Laden who has in fact threatened us a while ago. Estimates on ABC were in the 50-60,000 dead at the world trade center alone. Pentagon they wer saying like 5,000? its all guesses right now.

    --
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe =UTF-8&q=. amusing....
    1. Re:latest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I saw some footage on a Canadian channel (CTV Network) showing footage of people celebrating in the middle east. The clip ended with an identifier saying it came from Reuters in Jerusalem.

      Sickening

    2. Re:latest by mikeage · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's correct. I saw it as well... in the so-called "East Jerusalem", many of the same people who yell "Death to the Jews" also yell "Death to America". That's right, they don't just hate Israelis, they hate us, too... wonderful.

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    3. Re:latest by M.+Piedlourd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just a correction, 50.000 to 60.000 at the late WTC are worst-case casualties, not fatalities. No one knows, of course, how many have been killed, certainly many thousands, but most news sources say no more than 5.000 are dead and no more than 25.000 wounded. These numbers are sure to increase; may God, Allahw akg all the rest help us all.

    4. Re:latest by pclinger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are 50,000 workers at the WTO. I don't see how 60,000 can die from this unfortunate disaster (include the plaines you add another 150 or so).

      This is a national tragedy, I think I speak for all of us when we say that our thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families.

      --
      /. editors made it impossible to link to file:///c:/con/con in my sig. Please just type it in
    5. Re:latest by Perrin-GoldenEyes · · Score: 1

      News here in Baltimore was reporting thousands of people in the West Bank celebrating. People passing out candy. This makes me want to be sick. When Palistinians are reported killed on the news, I think most Americans are saddened by it. To have those people cheering over something that probably involves tens of thousands of deaths is mind-numbing. I'm not sure whether I want to cry or shoot them. Of course, that's not a whole lot better, but it's hard not to be emotional after something like this. I'm still waiting to find out whether my brother's girlfriend, who goes to NYU and was in the world trade center subway station this morning got out okay. He hasn't heard from her. I'm not a particularly religious person, but right now about all I can do is pray.

      --
      -Perrin.
      Now I want you to go in that bag and find my lightsaber. It's the one that says bad mother-fscker on it.
    6. Re:latest by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 2

      Ever seen the plaza right outside the WTO? Not to mention a lot of people go to some of the cafes for breakfast and such. I'm not saying 10,000, but it could have happened.

      Fortunately, I don't think it will be quite that many.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    7. Re:latest by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2
      There are 50,000 workers at the WTO. I don't see how 60,000 can die from this unfortunate disaster


      Perhaps from a surrounding building when the towers collapsed?

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    8. Re:latest by jhoffoss · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      If you didn't already know this, you need to pull your American head out of your American ass and realize that our (American's) shit does not smell like roses and the majority of the world does not like America or what we have done for/to the world.

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    9. Re:latest by mikeage · · Score: 2

      I don't like most of what we do either, but attacking the World Trade Center, and the pentagon, is plain and simply unacceptable.

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    10. Re:latest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bull.

      America's the last superpower, and there are some countries that can't stand us--but there are just as many that count us as valued allies, and just as many that are actually fairly neutral about us.

      Don't make me wrattle off a list of the things America's done for the world. "Ending Imperialism" is one that just about everyone on the world should remember.

    11. Re:latest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The director of the World Trade Center said that the towers only hold about 10,000 people each on a typical workday, with 5000 visitors spread across the entire day. Therefore 50,000 casualties seems a bit high.

    12. Re:latest by jhoffoss · · Score: 2

      I agree totally; I did not make my previous comment to imply or insinuate in any way that ANYONE deserves this, and I apologize if you took it that way. This is a heinous act and do not look forward to seeing what we do in retaliation to whoever did this. Eye for an eye will not work. But that's what will happen.

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    13. Re:latest by Snootch · · Score: 1

      About the partying Middle East - remember what makes good news. From the sound of some of the frothy-mouthed hatred going on here (and I'm not accusing you), there are people around here who would party if something similar happened over there.

      My hopes & prayers too for your brother's girlfriend.

    14. Re:latest by jhoffoss · · Score: 2
      I don't deny we've done good, I don't deny many countries count us as allies. That does not, however, imply that a country's citizens love/like/are indifferent to Americans. Take a trip to any larger European/Middle-Eastern/Asian city to see what I mean.


      Yes, we've done good, improved the world, all that. We've also destroyed some country's local culture (or are in the process), stepped on toes, all that. That doesn't mean we are loved or hated simply for this. That is what I was talking about. You talk to half the people in the US, backwater towns, whatever, and everyone assumes we walk on water. Most every person on /. knows this not to be true, though.

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    15. Re:latest by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

      they hate us, too... wonderful.

      Maybe its because they're tired of having the Israelis kill they're people with the complete backing of the U.S. Or maybe they're just assholes.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    16. Re:latest by ReTay · · Score: 1

      It would not have been me before today, however I will be happy when we KNOW who did it and they are punished. I don't care who it was obviously someone needs a lesson.

    17. Re:latest by Perrin-GoldenEyes · · Score: 1

      My brother's gf was in the area and is okay, though extremely shaken. That's what I hear through my mother anyway.

      Before today, I really don't think that Americans would react remotely similarly if something like this happened over there. As I said in my first post, I think most Americans are largely saddened by the violence in the Middle East. After today, I'm not so sure. To be completely honest, I don't think I would have complained much if police started shooting into that crowd of celebrators. On one level, I think that would be horrible. But on another, the idea of large groups of people celebrating over this is totally unthinkable, and I feel like they aught to be severely punished for being so...well...I guess evil is the only word I can think of to describe it.

      --
      -Perrin.
      Now I want you to go in that bag and find my lightsaber. It's the one that says bad mother-fscker on it.
    18. Re:latest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with all your posts. When I saw the coverage, I thought "good for them." Why should they like us? They don't have much reason too. But I thought it clever for the news to broadcast that little bit of anti-americanism, it gives the Americans someone to hate and blame since the doers are dead. And we all know, we have to blame someone.

    19. Re:latest by kot · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping it's less. I spoke to a friend who
      worked on the 70th floor, and she got out, though
      barely in time.

    20. Re:latest by Snootch · · Score: 1

      My brother's gf was in the area and is okay, though extremely shaken. That's what I hear through my mother anyway.
      I am so glad to hear that. I was worrying myself...strange, that. Even when you know there are several thousand who definitely died, you still worry about individuals the moment you know of one...anyway, I am very glad she's safe.

      Before today, I really don't think that Americans would react remotely similarly if something like this happened over there. As I said in my first post, I think most Americans are largely saddened by the violence in the Middle East
      I think that the keyword here is most. Just because an anti-american government wouldn't stop the celebrations doesn't mean that the demographics are necessarily very different. I should imagine that most Arabs would be as shocked as we are, perhaps more, as evidence points to some of them last time I checked...

      To be completely honest, I don't think I would have complained much if police started shooting into that crowd of celebrators
      Now I'll use this as a microcosm of what would happen if we went to war - imagine that they had. Imagine that they had completely levelled the street. Now think of how many innocent people's families would have to go through what you so nearly did with your brother's girlfriend. Along the path to war lies destruction and grief, and there are innocents on both sides.

  9. The Pittsburgh Crash by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Was a 747 jet bound for San Fran. Prayers for those lives lost, and families with loss on this day of infamy.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:The Pittsburgh Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, change your sig. Please.

    2. Re:The Pittsburgh Crash by caryw · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet that it was the handy-work of our F-16's.

    3. Re:The Pittsburgh Crash by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      Yeah i agree. The scrambled fighters probably had shoot to kill orders. That's terrible.

    4. Re:The Pittsburgh Crash by Heem · · Score: 1

      I'm sure of it. That plane supposedly was headed for california.. I'm sure it was shot down.

      --
      Don't Tread on Me
    5. Re:The Pittsburgh Crash by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2
      An unconfirmed report said that it appeared the pilot flew the jet into the ground, missing the target. So either the terrorist was unable to control the aircraft, or a very brave man at the controls tried to save as many lives as he could in his final moments. We may never know.


      Very hard to type while wiping tears from one's eyes.

    6. Re:The Pittsburgh Crash by tzanger · · Score: 2

      The scrambled fighters probably had shoot to kill orders. That's terrible.

      No it's not, it's commendable. What would you prefer, that the terrorists have control over the plane and kill hundreds if not thousands?

      It's one hell of a tough decision but I commend it.

    7. Re:The Pittsburgh Crash by Sniser · · Score: 1

      Why? You have problems with DEATH?. Tell you what, people DIE every day, LIFEFORMS DIE every day. DEATH is a pretty common thing, and LIFE would be meaningless without DEATH. So your denial regarding DEATH and PAIN also negates LIFE at the same time.

      And nevermind DEATH, LIFE also gets BORN all the time.

      Let's celebrate the LIVES of the victims, not mourn their DEATHS.

    8. Re:The Pittsburgh Crash by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Cockpit Voice Recorders will tell the tale of what happened on the 4 planes that went down.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    9. Re:The Pittsburgh Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plane was witnessed to be flying erratically before it flew into the ground.

      If the US Air Force had taken the plane down it would have been shouted from the roof tops to help bolster the moral of the country.

      I tend to believe that the passengers and/or flight crew figured it out and the plane went down during the struggle to regain control. Or it was intentionally flown into the ground by the passengers or crew.

      Until proven otherwise the passengers and crew of this aircraft are HEROs in my mind.

    10. Re:The Pittsburgh Crash by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      I'm not condeming the action. It had to occur. I'm saying its terrible that the pilot had to pull the trigger and kill ppl to save ppl. This is nothing to commend. It was simply necessary. Its a tradgedy. Its terrible.

  10. The really eerie thing is... by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...what today's date is.

    911...(9/11/01)

    1. Re:The really eerie thing is... by clark625 · · Score: 2

      Okay, this is a flame--so feel free to mod it as such. But I'm disappointed in the moderators that would rate the above comment as "funny" and not something "insightful" or "interesting". I can't think of one "funny" thing in relation to this disaster.

      --
      Long, cute, or funny Sigs are just another form of over compensation, used by geeks, nerdz, etc.
    2. Re:The really eerie thing is... by macdaddy · · Score: 2

      I disagree with the funny rating. It's not very funny. Honestly I think today would be a good day for the "funny" moderation option to be disabled.

    3. Re:The really eerie thing is... by Drey · · Score: 1

      Today is also the midpoint between September 5th and 17th -- which, in 1978, was when the Camp David Accord were signed, to bring peace between Egypt and Israel and attempt to get the other Middle East nations to join in the peace process.

    4. Re:The really eerie thing is... by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      It may be redundant, but I don't care... I definitely agree. Funny does not apply.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    5. Re:The really eerie thing is... by tubs · · Score: 1
      Surely it depends on what the context of funny is ...


      Funny "Strange" or Funny "Ha Ha"


      Maybe they should change the "Funny" tag to "Humourous" to avoid that confusion.

      --

      try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

    6. Re:The really eerie thing is... by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 1

      You mean: 11.09.2001 (sorry, european dateformat)

      But: 11+9+2+1= 23


      People on slashdot should be illuminated by this coincidence :-(

      --
      ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
    7. Re:The really eerie thing is... by Datafage · · Score: 2

      Explain please?

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

    8. Re:The really eerie thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      simple arithmetic fnord relating to the rule of fnord fives.

      fnord

  11. what does this tell us by rnd() · · Score: 5, Insightful

    about the ability of our internet infrastructure to handle the demand in cases of crisis?

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

    1. Re:what does this tell us by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 2

      Moderate parent up please... my thoughts exactly.

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    2. Re:what does this tell us by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      It's all that blasted JavaScript and images. http://www.freerepublic.com/ kept running throughout the disaster.

      Not that I'm in perfect agreement with all Free Republic stands for, mind, but their image-free "no fancy toys just the news" model works real well in a crisis.

      The Internet, though, seems to have held up well - I don't see any slowdowns, just news sites slowed to unusability.

      D

    3. Re:what does this tell us by markbthomas · · Score: 1

      The internet is doing fine. It's the news websites that are going down. My surfing of other sites is giving me no problems, and my traceroutes are getting to the news sites' front doors in normal time (2.5 ms from here to bbc.co.uk).

    4. Re:what does this tell us by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1

      Remember that the internet was ment to withstand a nuclear attack in its original conception -

      Today there was so much traffic that we couldn't even resolve many, many sites.

    5. Re:what does this tell us by komet · · Score: 2

      The Internet infrastructure is doing just fine. It's just all those fancy content management systems which are getting overloaded.

      --
      Any technology which is distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced.
    6. Re:what does this tell us by mskfisher · · Score: 1

      Yes - I've been checking http://www.internettrafficreport.com/ , and the network is holding up fine.
      I'm hoping that the news sources take this incident to heart and make sure their servers are ironclad, and make sure their pipes are huge.

      --
      0x0D 0x0A
    7. Re:what does this tell us by malfunct · · Score: 1

      What this does prove is that Radio, TV and other broadcast media are not going to go away. Are any of the Radio stations down due to too much traffic?

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    8. Re:what does this tell us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but the ones in NY are down cause their antennae were on the WTC.

    9. Re:what does this tell us by elfkicker · · Score: 1

      Hell, I live in Jersey City (right across the Hudson River) and am one of the few with no cable. I can't get anything on broadcast except CBS and Telemundo. Cell service is basically dead. Hardlines seem reliable, but some neighbors have been getting busy circuits.

      Internet is going strong except for the obvious sites.

    10. Re:what does this tell us by Enzondio · · Score: 1

      I tend to think that the reason that site stayed up would have to do more with the fact that the major news sites are being pounded thousands of times harder.

    11. Re:what does this tell us by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Interesting

      well msnbc.com is still up and fast too, having switched to a "high-traffic" minimalist mode.

      It appears only Microsoft can handle the big things.

    12. Re:what does this tell us by Heem · · Score: 1

      major problem is that everyone wants to see video, BUT due to all kinds of DMCA and other bullshit that we talk about on here on any other day, I cant SAVE the video to my PC and show my co-workers, or watch it again. I have to stream the whole thing again. STUPID.

      --
      Don't Tread on Me
    13. Re:what does this tell us by mpe · · Score: 2

      I'm hoping that the news sources take this incident to heart and make sure their servers are ironclad, and make sure their pipes are huge.

      Also that they either make their pages as "lightweight" as possible or have alternative lightweight versions...

    14. Re:what does this tell us by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      cnn.com, now back online, is going for the barebones look today too. One image per page, nothing else but text. There is zero content that isn't related to today's events. And there aren't any ads!

      I'm sure in a few hours when the excitment dies down cnn will be back online, full force, with ads, javascripts, and all that we expect of a corporate news site.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    15. Re:what does this tell us by aozilla · · Score: 2

      The internet is up and running fine. It's a large portion of the web that's down. What we need to do is build a web infrastructure similar to the internet infrastructure. Something like freenet would be a great start.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    16. Re:what does this tell us by cornflux · · Score: 1

      abcnews.com has been doing just fine. they switched to "light" mode way before everyone else.

    17. Re:what does this tell us by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      what does this tell us about the ability of our internet infrastructure to handle the demand in cases of crisis?

      As other posters have noted, this isn't an infrastructure problem; it's a site bandwidth problem. Specifically, this event is unlike most news events. Let's say this has caused a ten-times increase in traffic, whist most major stories only double the traffic.

      If you are CNN.com, and you get an average traffic of 50Mbps. You could get a 100Mbps line, and be able to handle 99% of events, or you could get a 500Mbps line and handle 100% of events. The additional cost of bandwidth wouldn't be justified by that 1%-of-stories benefit.

      Well, that's how I see it. They might be connected to a phat backbone, and pay by the megabyte. If that's the case, my point remains true, just for servers, instead of bandwidth. 100%-of-average overcapacity facility is easier to justify to the bosses than 1,000%-of-average overcapacity handling.

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    18. Re:what does this tell us by Moofie · · Score: 2

      Yeah, except for the radio and TV stations with their antennae on top of the World Trade Center. Betcha they're not faring too well.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    19. Re:what does this tell us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and ms's heavy traffic servers run on Sun

  12. AOL working great! by jkasyan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    http://my.aol.com/news/news_special.psp?newsid=wor ldtrade

    1. Re:AOL working great! by sacherjj · · Score: 1

      Possibly because no one will trust AOL with the news they provide?

    2. Re:AOL working great! by Genom · · Score: 2

      AOL owns CNN now...(through Time Warner)

      People trust CNN, for the most part.

  13. United Airlines web site by Targetman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://www.ual.com/Response/PressReleases/0,11641, -1_,00.html

    Unite's link. flight 93 is the Pa plane, flight 175 is missing.

    --
    I didn't do it, and if I did, you can't prove it. Bart Simpson
    1. Re:United Airlines web site by technos · · Score: 2

      UA is now reporting flight 175 as crashed.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
  14. Report of another hijacking out of Pittsburgh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just heard a news report that a United flight out of Pittsburgh is confirmed to have been hijacked.

    Also a 767 from Boston to LA (flight 175) is out of radio contact and officials are "worried".

  15. Pentagon news (good) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to NPR, the Pentagon has *not* collapsed, and although there have been significant casualties, the section that was hit was a new section that had many vacant offices.

    1. Re:Pentagon news (good) by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      I have a direct line to certain officials involved in this... for those interested in details:

      The outer facing of corridor 5 has fallen. It was a mostly empty section and the fire is mostly under control. Many casualties, but no deaths confirmed yet.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    2. Re:Pentagon news (good) by /dev/zero · · Score: 1

      Not a new section. It is the south side of the E Ring (there are five rings A-E from the center). The Pentagon is undergoing significtant refurbishment, section by section. Fortunately, much of the affected area is under renovation.


      It looks like there was some blow-through to the D Ring. Current reports are that the aircraft was a Boeing 757. They impacted near the center of the South Entrance. It appears that maybe a 50-meter width of the E Ring has collapsed. Can't see through the smoke to determine whether any of the D Ring is down.



      Gordon.

      --

      He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom.
      -- J.R.R. Tolkien
    3. Re:Pentagon news (good) by Da+Masta · · Score: 1

      Many casualties, but no deaths confirmed yet.

      Do you mean to say that many people have surely died, but none are confirmed, or should I redefine my definition of "casualty" to be injuries, not just deaths?

    4. Re:Pentagon news (good) by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      Casualty means an injury, not necessarily a death... I used to have the same misconception about the definition, took me a while to get it straightened out...

      Lots of other people seem to have it too, I've been hearing the two terms used interchangeably today...

      To set the record straight:

      Main Entry: casualty
      Pronunciation: 'ka-zh&l-tE, 'kazh-w&l-, 'ka-zh&-w&l-
      Function: noun
      Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
      Date: 15th century
      1 archaic : CHANCE, FORTUNE
      2 : serious or fatal accident : DISASTER
      3 a : a military person lost through death, wounds, injury, sickness, internment, or capture or through being missing in action b : a person or thing injured, lost, or destroyed : VICTIM

      Casualty therefore is anyone who could be considered injured seriously enough to be out of action for a while, but still alive. When reporting casualty figures, those deceased are usually listed seperately to differentiate between the two.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  16. i am in times square by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Troll

    i am in times square now i work at 5 world trade i was late for work today and obviously never made it i can not locate all of my coworkers i am emailing and phoning all cell networks seem to be flooded or down please everyone, pass this to EVERYONE: PRAY AND DONATE BLOOD PRAY AND DONATE BLOOD

    tell everyone: PRAY AND DONATE BLOOD PASS THIS ON

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i am in times square by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      it is very scary people i know are probably dead i work at 5 world trade and was late for work and never made it in.... alll subways down, wtc collapse oh my god... please, pass this to everyone: pray, pray, pray... donate blood, donate blood, donate blood... pass it to everyone thisd is bigger than pearl harbor
      please, send it to EVERYONE: PRAY AND DONATE BLOOD THANK YOU FOR YOUR THOUGHTS

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:i am in times square by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were a praying man my prayers would go out to you and your coworkers; as I am not I can only join with you in your sorrow.

    3. Re:i am in times square by imipak · · Score: 2
      The net seems to be holding up pretty well, considering there's a major IX on 55 Broadway (I believe?) - traceroutes are going round the houses a little, but apart from the major news sites being knocked down for an hour or so, it seems to be coping pretty well.

      At the risk of stating the obvious, if you're in the area, stay off the phone unless it's a vital call.

    4. Re:i am in times square by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have some compassion for a person who is seeing an absolutely horrific situation. This is not an easy time for anyone and we're all trying to cope in the best way possible. Don't let the terrorist mentality filter down. We need to keep our heads and not let them win.

    5. Re:i am in times square by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god, you got schooled. I'm not continuing this, if moderators can't figure out what a lamer he is in times of tragedy, I'm not gonna bother with it. You should both fuck off and die, I know people who worked in those buildings.

    6. Re:i am in times square by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would donate blood, but they won't accept it calling me 'high risk'

    7. Re:i am in times square by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      i just got back from st clare's and they are turning away hundreds of people who are trying to donate because they don't have the equipment, can you believe that? so anyone in the tristate area or elsewhere, just please donate blood and pray. there are no subway systems so everyone is walking uptown, midtown is full of thousands of people trailing uptown. please donate blood.

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    8. Re:i am in times square by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      btw, i was very upset when i posted this, i'm not trolling or karma whoring. i am still crying. i see the cap letters to donate blood in the main text of the topic, so that is all i care about. you may take me down to -100 karma, i could care less about that crap. i don't care, i just want people to donate blood and pray. thank you. i am sincere. this is the scariest thing that has ever happened to me.

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  17. Unconfirmed: another plane lost, headed for DC by TDScott · · Score: 1, Redundant
    It's unconfirmed at time of posting, but some newswires have been reporting another plane hijakced/missing and heading towards DC.

    Please remember this is not confirmed.

    1. Re:Unconfirmed: another plane lost, headed for DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is, I feel sorry for any poor buggers on board. The second that thing is believed to threaten the U.S. capitol in anyway, it'll be just so much smoking wreckage.

      -Exitus Acta Probate, Pax Paritur-

  18. Just thought I'd share this. by Coolumbus · · Score: 1, Interesting
    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb."

    Quote by Nostradamus

    See:

    http://www.ed.brocku.ca/~nmarshal/nostradamus.htm

    Scary if you ask me.

    --

    --
    Slashdot signature: 'Laugh assist to nerd'

    1. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by PeterMiller · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, not only does this not mean anything, but please....today is not the day to bring this up. Please mod down.

    2. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by bonneyrwk · · Score: 1

      NOT!!

      --
      new to linux, but would like to learn as much as i can :)
    3. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's to making vague predictions with VERY broad terms.

      Granted, that's creepy :)

    4. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly does NYC qualify as the "City of God"?

    5. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, folks, shaken by the blast, the nutcases are coming out of the woodwork.

    6. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who in the world considers New York City to be "the City of God"? Idiot.

    7. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      I there was anything to this bullshit, then it would give us the interpretation before not after the fact, alright?

      For example something like: "attack on the world trade center this year" is useful while "two brothers torn apart by Chaos" is utter crap, which fits on some world event or another in just about any year.

    8. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Drey · · Score: 1

      Um ... City of God is DC, Twin Brothers are the WTC towers, fortress is America, great (cough, cough) leader is Bush. Making prophecy fit the situation is easy.

    9. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NY = city of God?

      1. That's probably Jerusalem

      2. Manhattan seems pretty close to hell to me.

    10. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Nostrodamus managed to predict the other World Wars, why wouldn't he get this one too? I don't see any reason to ignore him just because you're a little scared.

    11. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Planesdragon · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Sheesh. Parent is hardly a troll. Nostradamus's prophecies are *always* vauge, and the quoted one is errie.

      "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb."

      Two brothers = Word Trade Center, falling, *right before* the Pentagon ("fortress") was attacked.
      This goes from "interesting" to "damn scary" if one of three things happens: George W either declares war or dies, or Osama Bin Laden is captured and blamed for this.

    12. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

      New York the 'city of God'? I don't think so.

      --
      **>>BELCH
    13. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is DC City of God?!?!?!?! What crack are you smoking?!?!?!?

    14. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Drey · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's easy; the Religious Reich that damn near control the Republican Party and help Bush make bad decisions regarding stem cell research. See? Making prophecy fit a situation is easy.

    15. Re:Just thought I'd share this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same crack he bought from God on a corner in DC, of course.

  19. Donate Blood Now! by MousePotato · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We are turning our business into an emergency blood donation center for the red cross. I ask that anyone who has a business that has a large amount of free space to donate it as an emergency center for the ARC to setup at.

    If you cannot do that please just go and donate blood. It is desperately needed for the hundreds if not thousands injured today.

    1. Re:Donate Blood Now! by DigiDarkCloud · · Score: 1

      Canadian Blood Services tells me they're helping out too. Fellow canucks: look at www.bloodservices.ca or call 1-888-2-DONATE and help.

      --
      SIG: 11
  20. Update: Military readiness by merlin_jim · · Score: 3, Informative

    The US military is on alert. For security reasons I can't post more details, but the 82nd airborne division has been told to suit up and according to one report one unit is already in the air, though they're not sure where they'll be landing yet. Speculation is that they'll land at a known friendly base in the middle east and then decide where to go from there.

    Obviously, I can't reveal my source for this, but its a close relative who is 'in the know'.

    --
    I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    1. Re:Update: Military readiness by dogzilla · · Score: 1

      Hey - I have an idea: if you have this kind of information, why don't you shut the f*ck up about it, instead of posting it on a world-accessible bulletin board.

      You absolute, complete, utter moron.

      --
      The crimes of eBay are a disgrace to it's pig latin heritage!
    2. Re:Update: Military readiness by Rev+Snow · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Loose lips sink ships, shit for brains!

      I sure hope your ``source'' doesn't suffer for your inability to keep confidential information.

    3. Re:Update: Military readiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats bullshit. 82 Airborne in Ft. Bragg has NOT left the ground. Right now, were on standby, if that. Threatcon Delta as of this posting. (12:33 pm)

    4. Re:Update: Military readiness by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

      Don't post shit about the military's activities here! You've just told the world there's a plane over the Atlantic that needs to be shot down.

      Look, folks, if somehow you stumble across privileged information regarding troop movements, please keep it to yourselves. You don't know who in the world is reading this.

      Getting modded +5 for possibly putting lives in jeapordy is a travesty.

    5. Re:Update: Military readiness by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      For those responding with flames about this, this information is public knowledge. If I know it, then the great enemy (whoever it turns out to be) certainly knew it before I did. Now details on where they're going, etc. I would of course not give out (not that I have those details). Understand, a family member is on that plane. I don't want it hurt anymore than anyone else does.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    6. Re:Update: Military readiness by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      Someone's posting disinformation. Kudos to whichever of you it is.

    7. Re:Update: Military readiness by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry though, because it's most likely misinformation.

      http://slashdot.org/~merlin_jim/

      This guy always has an "inside connection".
      He's also, imho, full of excrement.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  21. Military Alert by batboy78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All bases in the Colorado Springs area including NORAD, and US Space Command are on Threatcon Charlie, not the highest state of alert, but close, all bases have been closed to the public, this is going to get ugly. Where the hell is President Bush? Is there going to be a war?

    1. Re:Military Alert by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      The President is enroute (or already back) to the DC area. However, I wouldn't be surprised if gets on ground at a more secure location (as the White House has been evacuated). Possibly one of the nuclear command posts.

    2. Re:Military Alert by The_Steel_General · · Score: 2, Funny
      Please note that Threatcon Charlie is an indicator of expected terrorist activity, not military alert. Just working from memory here, but it indicates a significant threat of terrorist attack. Threatcon Delta is higher and suggests that an attack is imminent.

      TSG

    3. Re:Military Alert by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Historically there's a trend towards life-taking attacks on the US leading to war, yes.

      However, one death lead to 'the great war' (WW1 - 'great'??? sheesh).

      Promise me one thing, in the USA, please:
      For the whole world's sake don't counter-strike until you know exactly who's responsible, and only counter-strike exactly those people.

      i.e. Don't blame all Arabs for the craziness of one radical faction.

      THL
      (Brit who's related to Arabs - Palestinians, in fact)

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
    4. Re:Military Alert by Dop · · Score: 1

      Bush is in Airforce One which I expect is the safest place for him to be and he'll probably stay there for quite some time.

    5. Re:Military Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A war against who?? There is no one country or government responsible.

    6. Re:Military Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there going to be a war?

      Yes.

    7. Re:Military Alert by batboy78 · · Score: 1

      Yes you are correct Charlie is an attack has occurred and more is expected. But with Colorado Springs being a good terrorist target with NORAD and Space Command headquarters, all bases here are in high state of security.

    8. Re:Military Alert by haizi_23 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'm worried that there will be a big, ugly backlash in this country. Detroit, where I'm from has a large Arab population, and the tension between white blue-collar detroiters, arabs, and blacks is palpable enough without this shit happening.

      I also think an act like this can only be calculated to push us into a war, so I hope we don't take the bait.

    9. Re:Military Alert by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I know I am going to get hit big time with negative moderation, but this needs to be said.
      Most Arabs ARE TO BLAME!!! NONE OF THE ARABS HAVE MADE ANY REAL ATTEMPTS TO BRING IN ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS OR ANY OTHER TERROSIT GROUPS. The ARABS have supported Palestian even thought they HAVE DONE NOTHING TO STOP THE BOMBING IN ISREAL!!!
      IF AN ARAB KNOWS KEY INFORMATION (NAMES, LOCATIONS, ETC.) OF A TERRORIST (PERSON OR GROUP) AND DOES NOTHING, THEY ARE JUST AS GUILTY OF ANY ACTS OF TERRORISM THAT TERROSIT (PERSON OR GROUP) COMMITS BECAUSE THEY DID NOT SAY ANYTHING TO PREVENT IT.
      This is why Palestian, and any other arab country that does nothing, is guilty of Terrorism!
      Guilty by Association!!!!!

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    10. Re:Military Alert by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100%!!!!

    11. Re:Military Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (WW1 - 'great'??? sheesh).


      great (grt)
      adj. greater, greatest
      1. Very large in size.
    12. Re:Military Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, you are assuming a great deal. You are clearly over-generalizing (by your use of the word "Arab"). You assume all people of a religion/culuture/collective of countries (call it what you will) support this action. Has anybody considered any other alternatives, or is this now a bandwagon? What about the fact that Bush has been pissing of China for some time. What about macedonia?

      Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.

      Posted by a Racist-hating non-arab

    13. Re:Military Alert by jmccay · · Score: 1

      China DOESN'T have the ability to do this. There are only a few organizations that have the ability to do this.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    14. Re:Military Alert by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      congratulations...

      you are following the path the perpetrators of these acts intend you to follow. their motive is to stir up hatred amongst men and to strengthen existing divisions.

      so every arab to you is now a terrorist, or at least a terrorist sympathiser. no doubt you want them punished. why not round up all the arabs in the US and intern them? sure, why not all muslims?

      And bomb afghanistan, libya too, ah, why not iran and yemen aswell? that'll should quieten them and make the extremists think twice about terrorism!

      shouldn't it?

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    15. Re:Military Alert by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      oh yes,

      how do we even know the perpetrators were middle-east extremists? The US does not lack for home-grown extremists.

      --paulj

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    16. Re:Military Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arafat must be messing his pants - every time the Israelis won a battle, he was closer to winning the war, with the world deciding that the Israelis were the bad guys.

      But if this attack was by self-appointed spokesmen for the Palestinians, his cause was set back tremendously. All Palestinians will be hurt, along with their cause.

      Meanwhile, the Israelis will be able to coordinate an attack with the U.S. - without world opposition.

      Huge setback for the Palestinians.

    17. Re:Military Alert by toriver · · Score: 1

      Ah, the guilt by association of course extends to the CIA which RAINED many of these terrorists back when the Taliban et al were "good guys" in the fight agains K0mm0n1sm?

    18. Re:Military Alert by tzanger · · Score: 2

      Promise me one thing, in the USA, please: For the whole world's sake don't counter-strike until you know exactly who's responsible, and only counter-strike exactly those people.

      Amen. President Bush has already shown more reserve with this than Clinton did with OKC. I'm no big fan of either, but I'm hoping he continues to play this slow and steady until they can find who's responsible.

    19. Re:Military Alert by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

      How can you make such a broad generalization as "arab people"?

      I mean, white people (i'm assuming by your arogant-white-guy aditude that you are an arogant white guy) have done some pretty horrible things throughout history. So would it be OK to say "any white country that does nothing is guilty of Terrorism"?

      Thats the aditude of the terrorists that did this.
      You are no better than them, but I won't condem ALL white people because you are a jackass. Wake up!

      (i would quote the parent post but its quite lengthy and I don't want to make the page that much longer for this crap. Read the parent post if interested.)

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    20. Re:Military Alert by ReTay · · Score: 1

      As an American I would say that is acceptable with two qualifiers.
      One that EVERYBODY who obstructs the efforts to investigate pursue capture and return all responsible people two the United States is counted as people responsible. Two you understand if we don't give a sh*t about anybody else's opinion about how they will be executed.

    21. Re:Military Alert by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I normal would just ignore this, but I feel I have to clarify myself for the completely clueless. I know I will get hit with negative moderation, but this still needs to be said.
      You are forgetting one thing. The arab countries have been supporting each other--EVEN THE COUNTRIES THAT KNOWINGLY HARBOR TERROISTS! That is WHY I say any Arab that knows of terrorist activities before they happen and doesn't report them is guilty of that same action. The same applies to people of any race. Even now the people of Palestian are celebrating--dancing in the streets and everything! The Arab countries HAVE NOT MADE ANY REAL ATTEMPTS TO TAKE CARE OF THE TERRORISTS HIDING IN THEIR COUNTRIES! Do you understand that at all? That means they are supporting them at the most, and at the least, they are not against them. Forget what the leaders of these countries say. Actions speak louder than words, and the actions of the Arab countries to remove terrorist in their countries have been little or nothing. That is why I say the ARAB countries are to blame.
      This would be the same for the US, Britian, India, Russia, China, Japan, etc. We arrest people we know are going to commit terrorist attacks--when we know they are going to do so.
      By the fact that Palestian has NOT made any real attempts to bring in the terrorist who are bombing Isreal, Palestian is showing that they support such ativity and have no problems with it!!!
      You obviously didn't read my whole post. I bet you stopped readding after I said the Arabs are to blame. I would feel the same way about any country or group of people--regaurdless or nationality, race, religion, or sex. Action speaks louder than words, and the Arab countryies have done nothing to slow, or stop, the terrorist attacks commited by terrorist organizations hiding in their countries! I really hope you get a clue. The facts are obvious. If this was a white group, such as the KKK, and one of their members knew about a racial crime that was about to be commited, you'd expect that if that person who knew before hand about the crime would inform the local athorites, and if this person didn't you would assume they are just as guilty as the person who actually committed the crime because they could have prevented it. You would beleive this even more if the person celebrated, or joked about, the crime.
      You are the one who needs to wake up!

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    22. Re:Military Alert by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

      To quote your original post:
      Most Arabs ARE TO BLAME!!!

      Not "most arab nations" but "most arabs".

      Imagine you are an arab living in the U.S.. You love America, and you are saddened by the attacks.

      None of that will be taken into account when people direct their anger over this event toward you. Millions of Americans, just like jmccay, will hate you simply because you are arab.

      I wouldn't be surprised if race riots break out in the next few days. A local junior college here in sunny northern california is littered with anti-arab papers. One car even had "Bomb Isreal" [?!wtf!?] written on the back window.

      Your guilty-by-association aditude will help foster this atmosphere of hate. I hope you're proud of yourself.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    23. Re:Military Alert by jmccay · · Score: 1

      Some of those inocent Arabs were and still are sleeper cells for terrorists such as OBL.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    24. Re:Military Alert by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      Do you have any facts to back that up?

      Though I doubt it was them, I'm pretty sure China could have pulled this off.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    25. Re:Military Alert by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      Some of those inocent Arabs were and still are sleeper cells for terrorists such as OBL.

      Sure, so by your logic we should round them all up and put them in camps?

      Maybe you missed history class, but the U.S. tried that with Japaneese Americans during WWII, as did others around the same time. It was as ignorant a plan then as it is now.

      Taking away certain goups of american citizen's freedom would make your own freedom worthless and false.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    26. Re:Military Alert by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I know my history, and I know about the Japanesee Americans. I didn't say put them in internment camps. I consider Arab Americans just plain Americans.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    27. Re:Military Alert by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      I consider Arab Americans just plain Americans.

      Just a few posts ago you said "Most Arabs ARE TO BLAME!!!".

      So you consider them "plain americans" but you also hold "most" of them accountable?

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    28. Re:Military Alert by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I said Arabs. I didn't say ARAB Americans. Their is a difference.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    29. Re:Military Alert by jmccay · · Score: 1

      Don't bother replying to my previous message because I not going to bother to read your posts any more. You obviously can't read very well. Your mind is more closed than mine was when I was angry at what happened.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    30. Re:Military Alert by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I will spell this out so you can understand it. I said most Arabs are to blame. I consider Arab American's just plain American's. Therefore, I don't count them in the Arabs I think are to blame because I think they are American, and as americans would also be upset at this attack. Also as Americans, I would think they would be mad at the lack of any real responce to terrorist attacks made by people that hide in these arab countries. Verbally condemning an attack is meanlingless--it's just showmenship with no real intensions of doing anything about the terrorists within the borders of their countries. Some of the Arab respounces were just to try and keep America from attacking them for funding, supporting, and/or housing Osama bin Laden (spelling).

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    31. Re:Military Alert by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      By the fact that Palestian has NOT made any real attempts to bring in the terrorist who are bombing Isreal, Palestian is showing that they support such ativity and have no problems with it!!!

      And by the fact that Isreal and the U.S. have made no real attempts to stop the terrorism against the palestinians (excuse my spelling, as usual :/ ) they are showing that they support such activity and have no problem with it! And by giving huge financial support to the Israeli military, the U.S. is taking sides and joining into their war! This is not a war like we've seen before, but it is certainly a war. And the countless foreign civilians the U.S. has killed and assisted in killing over the years are no less innocent than the people who died in the WTC bombing.

      What these terrorists have done is clearly wrong, it is clearly immoral, there is no question about that. But the things the U.S. has done overseas are equally wrong and immoral. I'd imagine that these people are fighting back the only way they can; I mean they can't exactly launch missile strikes at us like we do at them.

      Take the feelings of pain and sorrow you feel after seeing hijacked airplanes crashing into america's proudest cities, and imagine what the people of, say, Kosovo felt when there were missiles raining down from the sky, hitting schools and hospitials along with anything else. And not just for a few hours, their crisis lasted for weeks. The bombs kept coming, they're friends and family kept dying.

      American's would like to believe that the U.S. represents a "beacon of freedom" (as W. put it) and in many places it certainly does. But the fact is, in many other places around the world the U.S. represents coldblooded slaughter of women and children.

      It's simple to dismiss the terrorists as madmen, but are the nations of people (such as egypt, one of the 'moderate' states) who applaud their efforts all madmen too? I don't think so. I think those people out in the streets are just oridnary people, like you and me, who just know the U.S. as the most well funded international terrorists in the world.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  22. Report of another hijacking out of Pittsburgh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just heard a news report that a United flight out of Pittsburgh is confirmed to have been hijacked.

    Also a 767 from Boston to LA (flight 175) is out of radio contact and officials are "worried".

  23. over here part II by psych031337 · · Score: 1

    Also here in europe a lot of the news sites are down, especially heute.de (german).

    DoS Attack or just a /. effect because all the people wanted info at the same time ?

    All israeli instituions and building have been ranked high security here in Germany.

    Be very very scared. This is fodder for a World War.

    --
    +++ath0
  24. Unconfirmed by finkployd · · Score: 4, Informative

    A pilot of another hijaacked plane crashed in a PA field rather then hitting another target in Pitt.

    I reported that in #slashdot. It is what I hard from my roommate who heard it from her ex-bf who is a coast guard pilot. I cannot vouch for it being true, it comes from no official news source (as of this writing). I've also heard that it may have been shot down.

    Finkployd
    my prayers are with the victims and their families.

    1. Re:Unconfirmed by batboy78 · · Score: 1

      I also heard something on the local news that there are two missing planes in Houston, does anyone in Texas have conformation on this?

    2. Re:Unconfirmed by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      Nope. I'm in Dallas. My in-laws are babysitting the kids at home, and I've asked to be notified if anything happens in the metroplex (in which case I'm headed home). Pray folks!

    3. Re:Unconfirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard that the flight from Newark to SF was the
      one that crashed near Pittsburgh. Apparently a
      passenger on the plane used their cell phone to
      call 911, as a 911 dispatch center somewhere in
      rural PA has reported that they received the call.
      It is believed that the intended target was in
      fact DC. There is no word as to why the plane
      crashed, but of course there is speculation that
      it was shot down.

    4. Re:Unconfirmed by wishus · · Score: 3, Informative

      I heard on the radio that the USAF shot it down because they determined it was hijacked and headed for the DC area.

    5. Re:Unconfirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speculation that this flight might have been shot down by F-14s. Purely speculation tho.

      I have never felt so enraged about world politics. I pray that those responsible for the wtc and petagon attacks are brought to justice.

  25. "London Evacuating" by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's not quite true; I am currently sat in an office pretty much in the centre of London (spitting distance from Trafalgar Square).

    Canary Wharf and the London Stock Exchange have been evacuated, there are rumours of Heathrow (the nearest large airport) being shut down, and I'd be surprised if most of the City (the financial district, and original City of London) hasn't been evacuated, but the rest of us are still here.

    (Of course, there's nothing nearby worth targetting, unless you really hate the theatre, or shops - Oxford Street is very close by, though...)

    Coincidently, it's my birthday today; guess I won't be forgetting this one in a hurry.

    Cheers,

    Tim

    1. Re:"London Evacuating" by imipak · · Score: 2
      A friend tells me Lloyds of London has been evacuated (world insurance centre, along with Frankfurt and... the World Trade Centre.)

      I can't post any more. Words fail me.

    2. Re:"London Evacuating" by dylan_- · · Score: 1
      We got an email sent to all staff where I work (in the City):

      'A message from the City of London Police:

      There is no intelligence to say the City of London is at risk from attack as in New York and Washington.'

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    3. Re:"London Evacuating" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the City (London) is just fine - business as usual. we've been told that we can go home if we want. no one I knew wanted.

      Tom

    4. Re:"London Evacuating" by uk_greg · · Score: 1

      Bad luck about it being your birthday. Mine is April 19th, which is when Waco occurred, and then the OKC bombing a few years later. These dates tend to crop up over and over as extremists tend to commemorate them with additional acts of violence.

      To echo an earlier message - PRAY AND GIVE BLOOD.

    5. Re:"London Evacuating" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Space Shuttle blew up on my birthday. I haven't forgotten that either. My good wishes go with everyone concerned.

    6. Re:"London Evacuating" by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      Bugger. I wanted to be evacuated from my office (on the edge of the City), so I could go to the pub!

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    7. Re:"London Evacuating" by Porag_Spliffing · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      It is my wife's birthday today also, we were just sitting down for a drink on an Amsterdam terace when we heard the news. Do you also know the coup (Sweet little pinochet) in Chilli was on 11.9.73

      Have a good Birthday anyway !
      an exciled Brit.

      --
      Maybe you live in interesting times
    8. Re:"London Evacuating" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is something foremost going on at the RAF bases, there has been sorties of Tornado's and Harriers taking to the skies for what I presume are patrols. The magnitude of these actions are still reverberating around the world, it's no wonder governments are feeling on edge and therefore high alert.

      My heart felt sympathies to all those involved and the American people. This has truly saddened my soul, a very sad day indeed.

      James,
      Great Britain.

    9. Re:"London Evacuating" by dazed-n-confused · · Score: 2

      Sounds like bollocks to me. I work in the City of London (just 5 minutes' walk from the Bank of England), just travelled home by suburban rail, saw no unusual crowds or anything along the way. Maybe some "targets" emptied; maybe some offices closed early; but London Evacuating? Nope.

    10. Re:"London Evacuating" by TwP · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true Brit! Was just in London this past week, and I am happy to be home in Colorado now. However, there is a nice pub near Trafalgar Square called "The Sherlock Holmes" with a nice ale by the same name.

    11. Re:"London Evacuating" by JohnKFisher · · Score: 1

      There was no intelligence that NYC and VA (pentagon's not in DC, people) were at risk from attack either.

      --

      John Kenneth Fisher
      Table of malContents
  26. Is this true? by stikves · · Score: 1

    Netscape.com says White House has also been attacked on their front page. but the thier story page does not contain this. It this true?

    1. Re:Is this true? by TGK · · Score: 2

      No it is not as far as I know, true. Fires have been reported on the National Mall including the OLD Executive Office Building (which is easily confused by those not familiar with Washington's building names with the White House).

      I've heard that the WTC has collapsed from several sources and that the Pentagon has undergone a similar structural failure as well. any confirmation on these? Images?

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    2. Re:Is this true? by hippietim · · Score: 1

      The Whitehouse has been evacuated, not attacked.

    3. Re:Is this true? by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 2

      There was one story reporting an "unrelated fire" in the White House. Sounds implausible though.

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    4. Re:Is this true? by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      According to CTV, the Pentagon's west wing collapsed. They haven't shown any images other than billowing smoke around the Pentagon, though.

      Both towers of the World Trade Centre have definitely collapsed. That made the TV. Many times repeatedly.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  27. Confirming that... by TDScott · · Score: 2
    Newswires also reporting that pretty much every tall building in the Western world is being evacuated, including Canary Wharf, London and the London Stock Exchange.

    Spurious reports of a crash into Chicago are at this time believed to be false.

    (Disclaimer: IANANS - I Am Not A News Service)

    1. Re:Confirming that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Chicago, and to my knowledge, there have been no incidents whatsoever here. They are evacuating most of the larger buildings (Wrigley Center, Sears Tower, etc), but that's it.

  28. Connected with the raids on the Islamic datafarms? by x-empt · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Could this all be connected with the raids on the data farms in texas this past week?

    I think our govt knew about this stuff a few weeks in advance. Coverup continues.

    --
    Ever need an online dictionary?
  29. blood drive by Mattygfunk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hospitals are reportedly desperate for blood donations. If in the affected states please consider donating if it is practical where you are.

  30. Los Angeles update... by Zaphod+B · · Score: 2, Troll

    People are evacuating large buildings in droves in Los Angeles - Century City towers, downtown towers, all government buildings are closed to non-essential employees, and the Reagan Library is closed because no tourists were there and the two retired librarians wanted to go home.


    People around here are all just evacuating to make themselves look important.

    --
    Zaphod B
    When duplication is outlawed, only outlaws will have /bin/cp
    1. Re:Los Angeles update... by plover · · Score: 1
      I'm not leaving the building I'm in. I'm just in shell-shock right now, and figuring the one place I don't want to be is Kabul, Afghanistan, in about 12 hours.


      Whatever rocks George is missing in his head, I just know he's going to make up for it by proving the US has the biggest guns. It wouldn't surprise me if he pulls out the green glowing weapons and lets the entire Taliban go ask Allah if they were right.


      John

      --
      John
    2. Re:Los Angeles update... by caffeinated_bunsen · · Score: 1

      That's precisely what has me scared shitless. I'm just hoping that Bush and company can keep a level head through this, and not just start the traditional military dick-waving contest.

      --

      Bugrit! Millenium hand and shrimp!
    3. Re:Los Angeles update... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what would you do?
      hold a peace conference?
      that works...

    4. Re:Los Angeles update... by Chakat · · Score: 1
      Heard the same stuff. LAX area is all fscked up, just general shock, confusion, anger. Though the evacuations in many places aren't bad ideas, there's still a rumor of a missing plane as of ~9:45 PDT.

      I'm just nervous because I live about a mile from LAX, it's gonna be chaos going home today.

      May god have mercy on the souls of those who perished today, and may the assholes who did this be forced to suffer a slow, whithering, painful death.

      --

      If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

    5. Re:Los Angeles update... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only problem is when we do it halfheartedly and kill half their country, leading to retaliation. we should take the whole thing. a society with religion instead of brains is never a good thing.

  31. Opinions on response by SpookyFish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For Americans (and truly all free nations), this has shaken our country to the very core and IMHO brings into question the ability to live our lives with the freedom we've always enjoyed.

    I believe retailation in the highest order is needed, but with religious zealots willing to carry out kamakazi attacks, I fear there will be two more for every one we kill.

    How do we preserve / return to our way of life?

    1. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuke Mecca!

    2. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      killem all and let god sort them out

    3. Re:Opinions on response by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      A few things: - Tell Sharon he has a free reign to deal with the Palestinians (who I've read are celebrating in Nablus over this) - Make Afghanistan a parking lot - Take out Iraq, Iran, and Syria Nuff said!

    4. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not assume that this was a religious attack this early. After all, we do have anti-globalization anarchists just as interested in disrupting the normal operations of the US.

    5. Re:Opinions on response by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      I believe retailation in the highest order is needed, but with religious zealots willing to carry out kamakazi attacks, I fear there will be two more for every one we kill.

      It's tempting to believe that, but remember a couple of things. First, the amount of terrorism reduced dramatically after the US bombed Khadafi in the 80s. These people are fundamentally cowards. and 2) there aren't that many terrorists that can carry out missions like this. It was incredibly well coordinated. You don't have to cut off many heads to keep things like this from happening.

      This requires a HUGE payback.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    6. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well best option Fuel Air exposives. Seal all boarders. Find the militias and get those yahoos to start passing out the large caliber firearms. Make it very clear that for ever attack we take out a major city with religious significance with warning (give the friendly/ambililant people time to get out)

    7. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's time that we drop the PC bullshit and retaliate. We're entirely too worried about what everyone else thinks about us. We need to retaliate like we can, not like what the UN thinks we SHOULD. Nukes should not be off limits. Citizens of countries who condone this type of action are not innocents, they are as guilty as the rest for not rising up.

      Palistine should be invaded and occupied. Afghanistan and Iraq should be destroyed, and America needs to assert it's power as the worlds only super power. Nations who defy us need to be put into place. Period.

    8. Re:Opinions on response by The_Steel_General · · Score: 1
      Twelve years ago, people expected that nuclear fire was going to rain down from the sky any second. We knew that, if that happened, it would mean death to the human race, not just the personal, individual sort of death that we all must expect anyway. It had been that way for decades, with the fear sometimes more, sometimes less.

      "Our way of life" got along pretty well, though.

      There will be changes, I expect -- some good, some bad. We can each try to be a force that struggles for improvement in What Happens Next. Decide what you want the future to be, and work towards it.

      TSG

    9. Re:Opinions on response by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      excellent idea!!!

      that should ensure even more Anti-US ill-feelings are stirred up amongst Arabs, and guarantee more support for Arab extremists leading to ever-increasing circle of terrorist violence -> retaliation -> terrorist violence.. etc.

      Dear God/$DEITY, please let the US be measured, rational and enlightened in response to this terrible act of terrorism, for the alternative is surely a road to darker days for this world.

      --paulj

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    10. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And it's precisely this sort of amazingly arrogant assumption by americans of godlike power over the world that has brought this situation into being. This type of response will inevitably produce an escalation of hostilities, up to and including a global war, and if that happens, *EVERYBODY* loses. Grow up.

      It's a terrible atrocity, and those responsible must be brought to justice, but automatically assuming it's those horrible uncivilised middle-eastern types may well be a tragic mistake. Even if it does turn out to be the work of people from that part of the world, casually talking about sterilising entire countries in retaliation is a bigger obscenity that the current day's events.

      Anyway, I think you'll find that Palestine has already been invaded and occupied.

    11. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the one hand a measured, rational response would be very good. It'd also be nice if this led to a lessening of tensions.

      However, there can only be one course of action taken when the choice is us or them. This could become one of those choices. If your relegion dictates your hate, polite political manuvoring won't set it to rest.

      Suicide bombers can't bomb us if they're dead before they strike.

    12. Re:Opinions on response by sharkbrother · · Score: 1

      truth at last. if there was a scoreboard for souls, then how many for hiroshima, sudan, somalia, vietnam, granada, cuba. the us has probably suffered a retaliation and is now preparing for a retaliation, which will be followed by a retaliation.

      thank I'm in africa.

      --
      I need t-shirts printed. I need trumpet lessons.
    13. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe retailation in the highest order is needed, but with religious zealots willing to carry out kamakazi attacks, I fear there will be two more for every one we kill.

      How do we preserve / return to our way of life?


      Very simple. Drop a few nuclear bombs on the middle east. If you don't hate the U.S., get out now while you still can.

      Sorry, but I just saw these nuts dancing in the streets in Palestine. People over there may hate the U.S., but when was the last time they saw US dancing in the streets when some of their people are blown apart?

      If this is in the name of their God and religion, then I don't care who I offend -- these people are have a fucked up God.

    14. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is infact wrong... terror attacks *ON* US Territories raised a 120% since the attack of Iraq!!!

    15. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think these "anti-globaliation anarchists", the crackpots who are opposed to the DMCA and whatnot, probably have a clearer head than to use terrorism on innocent people in planes and in the pentagon, than just attacking the trade center directly.

    16. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Americans (and truly all free nations), this has shaken our country to the very core and IMHO brings into question the ability to live our lives with the freedom we've always enjoyed.

      If we can ensure that EVERYONE enjoys the freedoms we do then we can solve the problem. However, when we enjoy freedoms at the expense of others, the repressed will have to painfully teach us to change.

      I believe retailation in the highest order is needed, but with religious zealots willing to carry out kamakazi attacks, I fear there will be two more for every one we kill.
      We have already supported the killing of many more "religious zealots" then casualties of terrorism.

      Retaliation is hardly a step towards world peace.

    17. Re:Opinions on response by festers · · Score: 1

      We start by stopping the cycle of violence.

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    18. Re:Opinions on response by Danse · · Score: 2

      the crackpots who are opposed to the DMCA


      I'm opposed to the DMCA, does that make me a crackpot in your view?

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    19. Re:Opinions on response by Snootch · · Score: 1

      Drop a few nuclear bombs on the middle east.
      Hmm...that would work. No really. I mean, who would mind dying slowly and painfully from cancer after the retaliation? And who cares about whose who didn't do anything...I mean, one you've bumped of a few thousand, a few million is just a couple more zeroes...

      Anyway, from the sound of this post, you'd be dancing quick as anything is we retaliated...
      "But Miss, Miss, they started it!" - maybe they did (remember that nobody even knows at the moment), maybe they didn't. Anyway, whether or not they did, that kind of thing is how wars start. Do you really want a war? If so, volunteer for the army. For preference, 101st Cannon-fodder Division.

    20. Re:Opinions on response by Mr_Dew · · Score: 1

      1) I think to say that our freedoms and way of life are endangered is exaggeration at this point. I cried this morning for the hundreds or even thousands of people trapped in the twin towers of the world trade center when they were destroyed. I hurt thinking about the people who narrowly escaped and the families of those who died - the trauma for them will last the rest of their lives. This is the most awful thing that anyone can be asked to deal with.

      But many, many people around the world have dealt with such tragedies in my lifetime. The Oklahoma City bombing. The earthquake in India. Every day is like this in the Gaza strip, is it not?

      I look outside my window and the sun is shining. There is nothing in my city that makes an attractive target. Airlines will fly again. I do not believe that the American government will propose any draconian measures to control and prevent terrorist acts. You don't preserve freedom by removing it.

      Panic is not going to help a situation this serious. Reason and compassion will.

      2) Retaliation is escalating the violence.
      This is the exact opposite of what we want to do here.

      When two individual people fight, sometimes it can resolve their inability to relate to each other in a backward sort of way. I made a good friend once by punching him out. Afterwards, once our anger was vented, we were able to laugh about the fact that I almost dislocated my thumb with the punch and his face was swelling. On the basis of that laughter we realized we could be friends instead of enemies.

      I don't believe that this can ever happen between groups, be it gangs, religions, or nations. All of the individuals did not start the fight. Innocent members will be hurt. There may be no personal context in which to laugh. And the fight can live on in the group memory as an unresolved anger.

      I hope our leaders are brave enough to address the source of the violence today instead of adding to it.

      There are many areas of tension and instability in the world - Israel and Palestine, Afghanistan, various African nations, Bosnia. There are also "virtual" instabilities between international political movements and bodies such as WIPO, the World Bank, etc.

      In failing to cultivate peace through diplomatic means before we are attacked, we allow suffering to breed unrest. What would we ourselves do if rendered powerless, hungry, afraid? We would eventually strike out in an attempt to gain attention and control of our lives.

      Today we have been given a taste of what the rest of the world lives with. We should use it to right our perspective and unearth our sympathy.

      It does not matter who was right and who was wrong. It matters that we and other people around the world are no longer at peace. First find peace.

      Helping an enemy will turn them from being an enemy. Let us understand the conditions that have bred this violence and help to end those conditions.

      Violence will only beget more violence.

    21. Re:Opinions on response by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Care to enlighten us on how to do that, Sparky? Turn the other cheek DOES NOT WORK on the international scale.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    22. Re:Opinions on response by SpookyFish · · Score: 2

      This is an eloquent and insightful response. I agree with your first point, and likewise believe that draconian measures are very unlikely. Taking steps to make people feel safe is an important part of freedom, however, and a key difference between our society and that of the Gaza strip.

      I must respectfully disagree with the second point. I am personally agnostic and would likely be atheist were it not for the incredibly deep-rooted faith in some people I have known. Whether the source is brainwashing or the unknown, there are fanatics with this strength of belief that tells them the American way of life is evil. I have little faith that diplomatic means can change these beliefs and know no answer other than eliminating their ability to carry out these attacks.

    23. Re:Opinions on response by kot · · Score: 1

      Agreed. And in any case, what else is there to do?
      Doing nothing is not any better....

    24. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we all know how well South Africa govns.

      A good friends of mine are recently from Johannasburg so do not tell me I don't have a clue.

    25. Re:Opinions on response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, then if it is an Islamic splinter group let us find the appropriate justice in the Koran.

      And if you've never read the Koran passages on criminal punishment I'll just say the US doesn't have enough Nukes in inventory to carry out the perscribed punishment.

  32. also by waspleg · · Score: 1

    national guard and marines are at ready all government buildings practically everywhere have been evacuated teh NYSE is down all air traffic has been shut down both in the US and Canada, israel has evacuated their embassies, there are car bomb reports from everywhere

    this is world war 3 people, i'm sure everyone is just waiting around to see who to invade

  33. nwes sites by crazyprogrammer · · Score: 1

    news sites that are inaccessable right now(to me anyway) are

    dailynews.yahoo.com
    www.reuters.com
    www.ap.org

    I think it would be a good idea to use lynx or some text browser so as not to put as much strain on the slashdot servers. Slashdot is the only site that is carrying this story that I can actually access right now.

    May there now be a moment of silence for those who perished in this terrible tragedy........
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    --
    "the fax machine is nothing but a waffle iron with a phone attached to it." - Grandpa Simpson
    1. Re:nwes sites by damiam · · Score: 1

      Google is working, and it's got a link to a cached copy of CNN.com on its front page.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  34. UA175 boston to LA reported down, but not where by jmarca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    CNN reports second boston to LA flight, this one united 175 (as opposed to american 11 that hit the WTC) is down. Did *not* give any further details.

    jem

  35. One news site still running strong is... by Walker+Evans · · Score: 2, Informative

    Portal Of Evil News

    www.poenews.com

    --
    Shameless Self Promotion : Webhosting at Blender Networks.
  36. Racism by danjerdanjel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hmmm... Think about the racial paranoia that is going to stem from this tragic event.

    People, unfortunately, look for excuses to target any group, and blame their woes on them. Whether they be economic (as is typical), or, in this case, terrorist. The Jewish people have long been scapegoats for Europe's woes. Even recently, with the Pauline Hanson issue, here in au, in years past, where migrants were blamed for the countries environmental and economic problems.

    Now. A group has already been selected, pretty much by default and with no actual basis in fact (yet). People of Middle Eastern background.

    Unfortunately, there will be ramifications.

    --
    - - -
    giftedu ;)
    1. Re:Racism by fnorgby · · Score: 3, Funny

      YES YES YES.
      People, remember that middle easterners were automatically blamed for the OK City federal building. This turned out to be one of our own.

      RESERVE JUDGEMENT until the facts are in.

    2. Re:Racism by reimero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As ABC News reminded us, we had the same reaction to the Oklahoma City bombing, immediately blaming militant Arabs. Turned out to be one of our own. On the other hand, who has the resources to pull off an attack like this one? Osama bin Laden is one of the few who does, but he's not the only one. I'm just at a loss to think of who else it might have been. But yes, before we blame people from the Middle East, we should examine all the facts.

      --

      ----------

      Something clever
    3. Re:Racism by blayd · · Score: 1

      Well, at this point the tactics used in these attacks come right of the Muslim extremist handbook. Note that I didn't say that is was definitely Muslim extremists, or that other groups may be involved, but suicide bombings of civilian targets is pretty much the signature of people like Ben Laden et all.

      --

      :wq
    4. Re:Racism by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Well, considering that Osama Bin Laden did bomb The world trade center just 8 years ago, that does make him a strong suspect. We shouldn't jump to conclusions, of course, but Bin Laden is suspect because he's tried to destroy these exact same buildings before. Not because people are 'racist'. If someone did somthing before, it is easier to believe that they will do it again.

      Like they said on NPR- this is the new face of war.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    5. Re:Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't think I will ever get on an airliner that contains more than three guys with a towel on their heads. Sometimes, your ass is more important than your political correctness...

    6. Re:Racism by sv0f · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmmm... Think about the racial paranoia that is going to stem from this tragic event.

      A group has already been selected, pretty much by default and with no actual basis in fact (yet). People of Middle Eastern background.

      I was born in Chicago but am of Asian Indian descent.

      I remember how Arabic people were hassled during the Iran hostage crisis. I was in 4th grade then. My dad explained how the US supported the Shah, and how when he was deposed, his Iranian supporters were also forced to leave. We were pretty poor and lived in a crappy apartment complex in south Chicago. Two such Iranian families moved in during the crisis, each with little girls a few years younger than I was. They were harassed mercilessly at school -- the students did not understand that they were "on our side", so to speak.

      I was a college student travelling Europe with a white friend when the World Trade Center was bombed a decade or so ago. We were pretty grubby as we went through customs at JFK airport in New York City upon our return. I was "randomly" picked out of line and directed to a secure area for detailed searching of my luggage. I noticed the other folks in the area were all of Middle Eastern or Indian descent. They had been "randomly" selected as well. I explained to the customs official that there was no need to search me, that I was natural-born US citizen, and flashed my passport. To no avail. By the time they finished with me, I had missed my connecting flight.

      I remember the hysteria in the first two days following the Oklahoma City bombing, the automatic susipicion that the terrorists were Arabs. But this died down quickly.

      I too worry that Arabs, even US citizens of Arab descent, will suffer in the aftermath of this tragedy. I'm not a member of that group, and have only experienced what I've detailed above, which is no big deal. I think it's important that we treat these people in the US fairly. This seems obvious as I write it, but maybe it's not.

      On the other hand, the scale of this tragedy might change things altogether. The number of people that died at Oklahoma City is comparable to the number that die when a large commerical airliner go down. We can comprehend such numbers. But 10,000 people or more may have died today. That's 20% of the number of soldiers we lost in the Vietnam War, if my memory is correct. The average US citizen may not respond to this terrorist action as they have to those in times past.

    7. Re:Racism by Panaflex · · Score: 2

      8 plane tickets, 4 cell phones, and a few guns.

      It's not about resources, dude. It's about fanatacism. People with a deep conviction in voilence are extremly dangerous. It only took a few guys to take out the OK building.

      And there is no political or civil remedy. Sorry congress.. adding fire alarms to the titanic won't work this time.

      pan
      no nyuck nyuck today..

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    8. Re:Racism by Moofie · · Score: 2

      No, the group that has been selected (Mr. Bin Laden's) is one that:

      a) has threatened, in the last few weeks, major terrorist action in the US.
      b) Is known to have been training people to fly passenger jets.
      c) Hates everybody who doesn't look like him.

      Circumstantial evidence, to be sure. But I don't give a DAMN what race the guy is...I do care that he's a psychopath. You can try to make this a race issue, but it simply is not. Just ask the (foolish) fellow who rode up to a crowd on a corner in Washington, DC, expressed his support for the terrorists, was briefly questioned by the police, and allowed to go on his way. Show me THAT sort of thing happening in, say, Afghanistan. Not bloody likely.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually people are saying this comes right out of a Tom Clancy book.

  37. Perspective by underwhelm · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    Let's keep the truly remarkable thing in mind abou this: we heard about it on Slashdot first. Great job, guys.

    --

    I don't need large brains to have a good time.

    1. Re:Perspective by Toony · · Score: 1

      here here to that!! This is the only site I've been able to hear about this stuff on.

    2. Re:Perspective by JabXVI · · Score: 1

      I second that. The updates Slashdotters are giving on this story are great.

      Thanks, Rob, for posting articles about this, and to everybody else for keeping us informed.

    3. Re:Perspective by ryanvm · · Score: 2
      Let's keep the truly remarkable thing in mind abou this: we heard about it on Slashdot first. Great job, guys.

      You moron. The only reason you heard it here first is because you've got your head buried in your ass. There are current events in the world outside of the DMCA, DeCSS, etc.

      Maybe Slashdot shouldn't be your sole source for news, eh?

    4. Re:Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You MUST be joking. I was watching TV at 6:30am MST when I heard about this. Slashdot may be where YOU first heard about this, but the rest of the world that doesn't live in front of a computer 24/7 saw the whole thing live, probably before you were even awake.

    5. Re:Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the first plane hit the North tower at 6:48 MST. If you knew about it 18 minutes in advance you should have warned everyone.

    6. Re:Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking arse licking gimp.

  38. Just talked to someone who was on the 81st floor by jjn1056 · · Score: 5, Informative

    He got out. Maybe many other have. there are almost 40-500 thousand people in those buildings.

    If you are in NYC, get off the phone lines NOW, and give blood.

    --
    Peace, or Not?
  39. Keep speding our money on the WoD. by hex1848 · · Score: 1

    This just makes me sick, we spend countless dollars fighting a lost war, and we let fucken terrorists into our own country, killing thousands of innocent people. keep all our special forces in columbia, it seems to be keeping our children safe.

    1. Re:Keep speding our money on the WoD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errr you know for a fact that these terrorists came from outside the US? McVeigh didn't.

      Two planes from the same airline taking off from separate airports hit the same target with pinpoint accuracy within 20 minutes of each other? You need people on the inside for that sort of job. Who would suspect good honest Americans working for good honest AA?

    2. Re:Keep speding our money on the WoD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense but your a moron, theres less then 200 Special Forces in South America, oh yeah out of 30000+ guys. Your talking 12 hours to recall them too.

    3. Re:Keep speding our money on the WoD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as much as I think the whole WoD situation is wrong, the two have nothing to do with eachother. I don't know why you brought it up.

  40. New item on eBay by TRS-80 · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:New item on eBay by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      And people are bidding on it!

      D

    2. Re:New item on eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To their credit, Ebay has pulled the item...

    3. Re:New item on eBay by hippietim · · Score: 1

      That just isn't funny. Whoever posted that is an asshole. Those bidding are fucking low life individuals too.

    4. Re:New item on eBay by blayd · · Score: 1

      I sincerely hope that whoever posted that auction is beaten until he/she/it is incoherent.

      At this point in time, it is neither funny nor appropriate. Real lives have been lost in this tragedy. Innocent lives. I fail to see any humor in that.

      --

      :wq
    5. Re:New item on eBay by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      Of course, the item has now been delisted. Thankfully.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    6. Re:New item on eBay by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry. This kind of stuff may be funny in time, but it's not funny right now. There are thousands of lost lives, many more thousands of injured people. Right now, Americans are upset and tasting blood. There are people in many other countries who are downright afraid of what actions President Bush will take. There is just no room for humor here right now.


      I'm not sure who has less class: the poster, or the one who modded up as funny.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    7. Re:New item on eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No It is funny... very very very funny... we never THINK life is important... of course not important for the Palestinians, nor the Chinese, nor the Japanese, nor the North Korian. They all could be killed and being laught at... "let's go bomb them" right! Yeah... we are justic American!!! But one day you may see your child get shot while laughting!

    8. Re:New item on eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. There is always time for humour. Everywhere is the place for humour.

      I cannot think of a single event in my lifetime that is as tragic as this one. At times like this, the depression kills. Laughter helps the human condition cope.

  41. Quicktime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone running MacOS or Windows, go get Quicktime and watch the coverage on the BBC World stream.

    1. Re:Quicktime by vila · · Score: 1

      There are links on Adirondackpark.com for the BBC World and Bloomberg Television.

  42. This is by wbav · · Score: 1

    A great attack on the US. But if you react with blame or violence out of fear or frustration at the first person you see, rather than getting all the facts, then the terrorists have won. I plead with all of you, think before you post or talk.

    --

    =================
    Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
    1. Re:This is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [agreed.]

    2. Re:This is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True enough, a good sentiment. Aquire, discriminate, point, shoot. Did a bunch of time as a contractor to the boys in Langley. Far as I'm concerned, step one is to revoke their charter.

  43. What today really is by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The anniversary of the signing of the Camp David Accords. One jet has crashed at Andrews AFB near Camp David. It's also almost 60 years since Pearl Harbor. This is our generations Day of Infamy.


    Whomever has done this has awakened the giant. We will not rest until we run them down and expose their evil and folly to the world.


    I may be a frequent critic of W., but today, I'm behind him 100% and want the culprits brought to justice and their abbetors, likewise.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:What today really is by BombTechnician · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Whoever did this will rue the day that this idea came to their mind.

      we will kick their collective asses so hard they will be destroyed.

      Where do i sign up?

      --

      If you see me running, try and keep up
      There's a good chance I don't know what the hell I'm talking about
    2. Re:What today really is by cheesyfru · · Score: 1

      The camp david story is false -- no planes have crashed into it.

    3. Re:What today really is by weslocke · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Earlier I heard an aide to Mayor Guiliani(sp?) being asked by a CNN correspondant what he thought as he looked at the ruins of the towers. He gave the expected reply of it being a tragedy, and the mayor is deeply saddened, etc, etc...

      I was expecting someone to say "I'm thinking that someone's going to damned pay."

      But if they're not saying it, I can guarantee that a lot of people are thinking it.

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    4. Re:What today really is by asbestos_diaper · · Score: 0

      No plane crashed near Camp David. That is a false report.

      --

      Visit me online.

    5. Re:What today really is by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Shock ... then grief ... then anger ...


      Count on it.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    6. Re:What today really is by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2

      And the date is "911". 09/11/01.

    7. Re:What today really is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want some Bloody Vengance! I really hope this whole situation wont be allowed to pass over without retribution.

      We dont have any accurate counts of how many were killed today.. But most would say the people who died today were innocent.

      Whats that Metallica album name? Kill 'em All!

    8. Re:What today really is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How many innocent children did the US murder in Hiroshima and Nagasaki ?


      How many more will you kill because of this ?

    9. Re:What today really is by imipak · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      > I may be a frequent critic of W., but today, I'm behind him 100%

      "My country right or wrong" is an understandable first response; but I just hope you realise that bombing the crap out of Eygptian babyfood factories (as you did after the African bombings) is NOT the way forward.

    10. Re:What today really is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [agrees.]

    11. Re:What today really is by __donald_ball__ · · Score: 1

      The anniversary of the signing of the Camp David Accords.

      That is not true.

    12. Re:What today really is by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      As a strange coincidence, today is the anniversary of the discovery of the island of manhattan. (1609)

    13. Re:What today really is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WE didnt do that CLINTON did!!!!!! HE made that decision AGAINST his advisors.

      GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT!!!!

    14. Re:What today really is by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

      Shock ... then grief ... then anger...

      ...to continue...

      then hatred.... then unity...

      Seriously, this event puts 99% of american's in the same camp. Everyone seems to "support W" on this. Tragedy brings us together as a nation, for better or for worse. And if the U.S. is successfull is exacting some sort of revenge, the credit will undoubtedly fall (at least somehwhat) to GWB.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  44. prays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my prayers are with those that were where the attacks took place.

  45. Canada Status by gbr · · Score: 2, Informative

    All Canadian Airports are shutdown, except for flights that are already in the air. They are providing landing for those planes.

    The Canadian/US border is closed.

    Canadian Military is on alert, and miltary police are in key locations.

    Toronto Stock Exchange is closed.

    1. Re:Canada Status by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      Last I checked (about 10 minutes ago) the border was still open. I'm a Canadian citizen, working in the US (Buffalo, NY) and I've been calling every 1/2 hour or so to check if the Peace Bridge is still open, since we keep getting false news reports that it's been closed.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  46. White House evacuated, but NOT destroyed by TDScott · · Score: 3, Informative
    At time of writing, the White House is still intact, despite a misleading header on Netscape.com. It's been evacuated (and thus 'hit' as in 'hindered'), but has NOT been destroyed.

    (Disclaimer: IANANS - I Am Not A News Service)

  47. Maps of the World Trade Center by UnBlinking · · Score: 1

    If you are concerned that you may have friends in the area, unfortunately the Port Authority of NY and NJ site ( http://www.panynj.gov/ ) now reports:

    "All facilities are closed due to a state of emergency."

    However, see this inside page at the Port Authority:

    http://www.panynj.gov/wtc/wtcfram.HTM

    Directions appear here:

    http://www.panynj.gov/wtc/directions2.htm

    "The World Trade Center is located in lower Manhattan, stretching from Church Street on the east to West Street on the west, and from Liberty Street on the south to Vesey Street on the north."

    Best vicinity map:

    http://www.panynj.gov/wtc/wtcareamap7-00.gif

    Other interior maps:

    http://www.panynj.gov/wtc/mallmapframe.html

    GS http://www.unblinking.com/

  48. Lots of Info at Yahoo by bahtama · · Score: 2
    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

  49. hang on, I saw this one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you just have to send that dude back in time a few days and he can sort it all out.

  50. Rights by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Insightful
    We go through airport security to protect us. Well, I guess our rights being trounced on did nothing to protect us. The metal detectors in government buildings did nothing to keep those planes out.

    Maybe the next time, people will question, "are having our rights trampled on really giving us security?"

    1. Re:Rights by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, I guess our rights being trounced on did nothing to protect us.


      Well, to be fair, we can't say how many potential terrorist hijaakings were never carried out because the potential perpetrators figured they wouldn't get away with it.


      Having said that, a more effective way of avoiding terrorism would be foreign policies that don't treat other countries as if they exist merely to serve our commercial needs.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Rights by 7dragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      EXACTLY!
      Our rights have been trampled AND WE PUT UP WITH IT.

      Who wants to make a bet that martial law and THE SUSPENSION OF OUR CONSTITUTION will be attempted.

      Although, I believe that even during the Civil War, Lincoln's suspension of the Constitution was illegal.

      But, if you don't have a 2nd Amendment protecting your firearms ownership, who the hell can stop it.

      More police! They'll protect us...
      ...NOT!

    3. Re:Rights by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      Just in case you're claiming that being allowed to bring guns to work or on a plane would have helped, how?

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Rights by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

      You 'guess' wrong. You're an idiot. There could well have been pilots involved, who could very easily have infiltrated over time. Chances are also very high that hundreds of simultaneous hijack attempts took place, knowing full well that only a few would ultimately succeed.

      The 'rights' that you're sniveling so self-righteously about were earned and fought for by others, and will have to be earned and fought for time and again.

      Don't even pretend to have the slightest idea what 'freedom' and 'liberty' and 'rights' really cost. When you are called upon to pay, THEN you will begin to know.

      --
      **>>BELCH
    5. Re:Rights by 7dragon · · Score: 1

      He didn't say that so why are you putting words in his mouth?

      But since you bring it up; No carrying firearms onto the plane do not necessarily decrease the possibility of a terrorist attack, but responsible, even minded people would have a better chance of disarming, disrupting or defeating an attempted hijaaking with an appropriate tool such as a firearm rather than an unevenly matched tool such as a spoon or fork.

    6. Re:Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You idiot. One problem illustrated by these attaacks is that airport security is too lax. And why? Because people don't want the "bother" of real security. Well that's going to change now and it's a good thing. It's unfortunate that we require a tragedy to get this idea through peoples' heads (although clearly not through the thick numb skulls of people like you). I am a fan of liberty, privacy, and rights, but when I want the PRIVILEGE of travelling on a vehicle that, if taken over, can become a weapon of terrible magnitude, I for one am willing to momentarily give up some of my rights to privacy.

    7. Re:Rights by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      When someone dies in a car crash despite having their seat belt on, car companies don't throw up their hands and say, "Well, clearly these seatbelt things are useless, someone still died! Take them all out".

      Airport security and metal detectors in buildings do serve a purpose, to deter criminal activity, and hopefully catch people in the act. No security system in the world can be made to handle every concievable possibility or threat. That does not mean, however, that we should just abandon all security and leave ourselves open to attacks from every minor or not-as-serious threat.

    8. Re:Rights by Savant · · Score: 1

      Folks, your security was lax anyway. Speaking to a colleague who passed through Kennedy Airport only about 2 weeks back (coming from UK), he mentioned that US security was surprisingly lax compared to European airports, with many electronic gadgets he had with him including a laptop remaining unchecked. It's still possible it could happen over here, but there's a lower chance the better the security is. Allowing every man and his dog to carry firearms onto planes is *not* going to help.

    9. Re:Rights by David+Hume · · Score: 2

      We go through airport security to protect us. Well, I guess our rights being trounced on did nothing to protect us. The metal detectors in government buildings did nothing to keep those planes out.

      Maybe the next time, people will question, "are having our rights trampled on really giving us security?"


      Realistically, that is not the conclusion the vast majority of people are going to come to. I suspect you know that, and are afraid, with very good reason, of the result

      The vast majority of people are going to conclude that obviously metal detectors at airports, etc., are NOT enough. That if, in the interest of safety, searching all luggage, body searches, hell, cavity searches are necessary, then so be it. And if you don't like it? You don't have to fly.

      Please understand, I am neither advocating nor endorsing that view. I am making a factual prediction. Expect American society to be a LOT more security conscious, a lot more closed, and for civil liberties to suffer.

    10. Re:Rights by philthpig · · Score: 1

      you goddamned idiot

      we are obviously free enough to get into airports, hijack planes and kill hundreds of peole. i suppose you think we need the freedom to carry guns everywhere to protect ourselves from the planes.

      fuck you.

    11. Re:Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may actually have that backwards. Ironically, it would be the compromise of security in consideration of our rights that allowed this to happen. That's the problem, one that is difficult to resolve. It's the price of living in a relatively free society; freedom and security are often at odds. Gains on one side come at the expense of the other. If you lock your door at night, then you should be able to understand this at some level. To put this in a /. context, this would come under Network Administration 101.

    12. Re:Rights by mr.fonEtIks · · Score: 1

      One could blame Affirmative Action for making it easier for these people to get piloting jobs. Just accuse an airline for not having enough [insert nationality here] pilots and they will buckle to keep from being sued.

      I just love what we Americans are doing to ourselves!

    13. Re:Rights by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Which people would they be? There is no evidence of who did this yet. Don't go jumping to racist conclusions, that's all I'm saying.

    14. Re:Rights by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the fact that as private companies, the Airlines can certainly impose a wide range of security restrictions on their customers. Nothing in the Constitution prevents someone from saying "I'll gladly do business with anyone who willingly submits to a full cavity body search".

      Hell, there's whole subsets of prostitution with that exact business model!

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    15. Re:Rights by Tog+Neve · · Score: 1

      Sure terrorism on aircraft may decrease by allowing the common folks to carry thier firearms on board. However, there would be increases in incidents on board the air crafts involving firearms. Could even be increase in hijackings just like carjackings. Some punks wanting to take a joy ride in a 747 and the hell with everyone else. You must also remember that the airlines are not public transportation. These are private airlines and do not belong to the government for them to control. It was the airlines that established the FAA and requested it. They do not want people onboard with weapons. It is them that would look bad and lose money and business if more things started to happen.

    16. Re:Rights by 7dragon · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd say they look pretty bad right now...

    17. Re:Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm disabled and many times at the airports they do not check me at all, although they do run my bags through the X-ray. I find this disturbing, but some airlines insist on just letting me through even when I say it's okay for me to walk through with non-disabled people.

      One time I was in a hurry, and I hand carried a Cisco 2501 (boxed) into the plane before realizing that no one had stopped me to check the box. Just think about it - metal casing, electronics... add a battery and some platic explosives and I've got a bomb!

      So you may say that you felt your rights were trampled on during security checks. But in that way, my rights were not trampled on and I felt pretty damned frightened.

      Many times, I ignore the security people urging me to bypass the metal detectors, and just walk through the detectors in hopes that they'll perform due dilligence on other disabled people.

      But whenever I'm in the plane and see another suspicious looking person with a limp or something, I can't help but wonder if he's got a gun or something, since I myself could easily sneak one on board.

    18. Re:Rights by pallex · · Score: 1

      "lax compared to European airports, with many electronic gadgets he had with him including a laptop remaining unchecked."

      I`ve flown from UK -> Denmark many times recently. You can take what you want onto the plane (regarding electronic devices). You can use them on the plane, except for phones and anything which transmits radio signals.
      Basically you *could* use even those as long as the stewardesses dont catch you! Thats one thing
      that could change (if it was considered relevant).

      But we still have metal detectors and passport checks, even between 2 European countries (probably because the UK isnt signed up to the Schengen agreement). Sounds like the US is more like the UK train system - you just turn up, get a ticket, and get on, with no checking.

      Of course, the US would need no extra security in the planes, if preventing hijacking is the priority - simply lock the pilots into the cabin before take-off and make it impossible for them to open the door until after the plane has landed (i guess you could have an emergency fire exit via a cockpit window or something)

  51. From AP by Utter · · Score: 1

    This news was originally in Swedish (blame my poor english):
    "Palestinian groups are celebrating. The news agency AP reports that palestinian groups in Nablos on Westbank are celebrating the attack."

  52. Re:fp - mev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid motherfucker. People are dead and you're worried about first post? I hope you lose some loved ones in a terrorist attack someday.

  53. Wow by phoon12 · · Score: 1

    Denis Leary said that after his generation saw JFK shot on live TV, they were afraid to change the channel for the next 20 years. Now we have ours...

  54. The Internet is failing to support this event by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I'm writing this just after the towers have collapsed. CNN is the hero of the day, switching to low bandwidth text/html with one image and getting the news out. Newsmax is just barely keeping up. MSNBC is showing an IIS error page, FoxNews is unavailable, as is ABCNews, Yahoo DailyNews, the BBC, the Washington Post, and many other big sites. The Washington Times isn't even carrying this story yet. Slashdot looked to be the early clearing house, but they went into 'server trouble' yet again, and noone can post right now, or log in (to turn off all those stupid icons that are sucking bandwidth). Mozilla crashed on me, Netscape 4 under Classic (OSX) is doing OK, but having DNS trouble and IE still can't figure out what my proxy is about. At work here, we had a DirectTV setup a while ago, so I tried to get that reauthorized so we can watch the news (no, nothing but advertising on the free signal) and the telemarketer couldn't find our access card or setup an account with my credit card because the phone number at work isn't my home phone. My friend Brian went out to RadioShack and bought a TV antenna, and we were plugged into the events of the day, at last, by *broadcast*. That antiquated 70-year old technology we're all so eager to see get replaced in 5 years is the only thing working. Some how NBC is still broadcasting. I guess they have backup antennas that weren't on the World Trade Center. They even have men on the street reporting, although that guy needs to get away from the school where the bomb is. We won't call him a wimp for running like hell - we'll call him smart. That crazy guy's report is making it all the way up here to a little valley in New Hampshire like clockwork. Now that's a mature system. The point of all this is that while computers and the Internet are fun and all, we're kidding ourselves if we think it's ready to become our national infrastructure. The nature of today's event is almost strictly broadcast but show me an easy way to tune into the mbone today. ("The What?" lots of readers say). Some will call me a luddite, but I love technology as much as the next geek, so call me a pragmatist instead. We have alot of work to do if we want this baby we call the Internet to really support our society.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:The Internet is failing to support this event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "*broadcast*. That antiquated 70-year old technology we're all so eager to see get replaced in 5 years is the only thing working"

      Dont nkow where you get that, I guess you are talking about the switch to HDTV or DTV in 2006.
      But you are wrong the switch will still include broadcast in fact that is what it is all about, they will be broadcasting HDTV in 2006 so broadcast TV is not going anywhere.
      People tend to make this stuff up or what?

    2. Re:The Internet is failing to support this event by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The issue isn't one of analog vs. digital, it's of mature systems vs. new ones. Systems just takes a while to get right, and it's important to see the system as being separate by different from the technology itself. I'd love high quality and high reliability, but in a time like this we need reliability over quality. Just one of those pesky engineering tradeoffs.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  55. Re:i beleve... by WeedMonkey · · Score: 1

    "They bombed our innocents, so I think we should, uh, bomb their innocents! Yeah!"

    Oh, what a sensible reaction.

  56. Stay off the phone!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telecommunication systems NATIONWIDE are straining under the tremendous load. Emergency response teams are having difficulty with communications systems.

    Emergency crews need communications much more than anyone else right now.

    PLEASE AVOID THE USE OF THE TELEPHONE OR CELL PHONE, AND ADVISE OTHERS TO DO THE SAME!!!!!!!!!!!

  57. September 11th by aoihai · · Score: 1

    There are reports that this attack is a commemoration of the signing of the camp david accords. Which were worked out from September 5th to 17th (the 11th is the average date).

    --
    You were eaten by a grue.
  58. The Path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We are all screaming for blood, demanding massive retaliation.

    That is exactly what "they" have been doing as their people are killed.

    I'm not against retaliation, just before we start down the path, we should realize whose path it is, and where it goes.

    1. Re:The Path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are you referring to by "they", pray tell?

      Coward indeed...

  59. Good summary/snippets page by gimbo · · Score: 2

    This page has a good summary list of news snippets from various sources, and it's updated fairly regularly:

    http://www.gweep.net/~leaf/wtc.txt

  60. Mirror...Kinda by mkelley · · Score: 1

    I have a copy of what CNN is running on their site with some information from Fox. mkelley.net. Please be gentle my server isn't that strong.

    --

    m.kelley
    life is like a freeway, if you don't look you could miss it.
  61. This has some long-term implications by Joff_NZ · · Score: 1

    This is going to lend a lot of weight to the argument for less privacy for individuals..

    Also, some photos here

    --
    The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
  62. Canada closes airports, border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Confirmed here in canada we've closed all airports. No planes will be flying in north america.

    International flights enroute to north america will be landing here in Halfiax. Emergency measures organization has taken over authority here in the city; the police and security will be reporting to them. Seems likely government buildings and such will be evacuated (our naval dockyards would make an inviting target to inbound terrorists). Radio has mentioned a dozen planes have already landed and as much as 50 more expected to arrive.

    Also reports the US-Canada border may be closed and closing. Not sure on that one.

  63. News from Maryland by strredwolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the latest from Maryland, which is "right next door" to DC:

    * Maryland is tightening security all throught the state.
    * AMTRAK Baltimore Penn Station is shut down.
    * BWI Airport is accepting landings only, no flights out.
    * All schools are closing, and Annapolis's (state capital) MD State Circle (state capital) is closed to all but emergency traffic.
    * State Police are asking folks to limit phone use, both landline and cell.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:News from Maryland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maryland is shut down, I work at Johns Hopkins Hospital. They are freaking, the hospital is in state of emergency mode. And if you are trying to get into Baltimore, you need ID, the military is stopping everyone.

  64. Our Prayers Go Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    May angels greet the dead in paradise and watch over the wounded, their families, and the rest of us.

  65. mirror everthing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm at akamai and we are running cnn right now, I don't know how much longer it will be up so mirror everything you can get your hands on

  66. Taliban Press Conference by mmThe1 · · Score: 1


    I just heard on TV that the Taliban is going to hold a Press Conference shortly.

    Also reported is the claim of a French Newspaper Editor that Osama Bin Laden warned beforehand of the attacks.

  67. Paris air defences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The french military has rolled out several mobile air defence batteries on the edges of the capitol. The soldats guarding them are not having much humour. Very scary.

  68. Early Warnings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US had 1 too many warnings, that the security is lacking, one could remember the excecution of Tim McVeigh not long ago. I am just praying to GOD we will not have a World War 3. If US want to react to this, how would they?

  69. Salon is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.salon.com still has the AP snippets.

  70. Hysteria by FFFish · · Score: 5, Informative

    PLEASE Please please try to avoid getting hysterical about this. I'm finding message boards filled with frothing hatred, wanting bloody revenge against entire countries.

    Don't escalate this into war. There are no winners if it goes to war. We'll all just end up discovering that the terrosits do nukes. Some major American city will be vapourized in re-retaliation.

    And get in touch with your State and Federal representatives. Protest any movement toward restricting your personal freedoms -- because they are going to lock you down. Protest any over-aggression -- because you will pay when the terrorists re-retaliate.

    Time is NOT of the essence! Insist that things move carefully and cautiously. The world is in a delicate situation for the next few months. Treat it like a fragile, crystal bowl... and don't drop it.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Hysteria by GreyyGuy · · Score: 1

      The same things were said in emotion after the Oklahoma bombing, and that turned out to be an American.

    2. Re:Hysteria by M.+Silver · · Score: 2

      I'm finding message boards filled with frothing hatred, wanting bloody revenge against entire countries.

      Not just countries. There was a caller on one of the stations I flipped past (DirecTV swore it was the Senate channel, but nobody was doing their regular programming, excepting the Weather Channel, whose weatherfolks are probably saying "And the weather on the East Coast looks like... oh, who cares, nobody there is watching *me* anyway") explaining that we should get all the Muslims out of the US. Now, maybe she was completely clueless and didn't realize that not all of them are here on visas, y'know? Heck, all the Muslims I know were born here.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    3. Re:Hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was not just a terrorist attack, it is an act of war. I believe that a war like response is necessary.

    4. Re:Hysteria by tringstad · · Score: 2
      I'd agree with you that people need to stop getting hysterical about this, as it hinders clear and intelligent thinking. But as for not escalating this into a war, I'm not sure that's a good idea.

      If it is possible to _prove_ that a certain country is responsible for this, it will be practically necessary to put a hurting on them, or there could potentially be far worse problems down the line. Just like dealing with the bullies in High School.

      First off, if nothing were done in retaliation, then you are sending a clear signal to the terrorists that they can get away with it, and they'll likely progress onto worse behavior. Secondly, other would-be terrorist groups would see that the first group got away with what happened, and would be encouraged to try it themselves.

      No, there won't be any winners. But the goverment is going to be under a lot of pressure to be sure that there aren't anymore incidents like this, and serious retaliation is likely going to be the best answer. The most important thing is to be sure that we retaliate against the right people.

      And as for protesting any movement toward restricting your personal freedoms, I couldn't agree more. However, it's too bad most people don't care enough to even vote.

      -Tommy

      --
      "I got a half gallon of Jack, and 2 dozen Ant Traps. I'm about to get wild." -me
    5. Re:Hysteria by Col.+Panic · · Score: 2
      Be realistic. They - whoever "they" are - have destroyed the WTC and part of the Pentagon. That means war - seriously. Bush said we will "hunt down" those responsible and he meant it, to be sure.

      I am somewhat pacifistic in nature, but these are acts of war and will be met accordingly.

    6. Re:Hysteria by YKnot · · Score: 2

      Please do not let the situation escalate. I have read numerous messages which express fear of exactly this: World War III. Please keep calm. I know that this is hard to do and I would like to express that, although I certainly can not put myself into the situation of an American citizen, I am honestly terrified and deeply shocked. PLEASE do not react in a way to put the world at risk.

    7. Re:Hysteria by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Acts of war are committed by one nation-state against another. We the ashen-faced know well who the "another" was, but is there a nation-state responsible for these attacks? This probably means organized violence in response, but not war.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    8. Re:Hysteria by Omnifarious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only way to prevent attacks like this is to be a nice country, and to make sure that anybody who ever does something like this is shortly in very serious pain. We haven't done much of the first, and should possibly rethink how we deal with the world. The second is absolutely necessary for our continued freedom.

      As Teddy Roosevelt said "Walk softly and carry a big stick."

    9. Re:Hysteria by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Terrorists generally use "retalliation" as an excuse. Do you honestly believe that they would *not* attack if left unmolested?

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    10. Re:Hysteria by mblase · · Score: 2

      Man is the only animal that deals in that atrocity of atrocities, War.

      And, at the opposite extreme of the evolutionary scale, army ants. Your point?

    11. Re:Hysteria by debrain · · Score: 2

      Yes, I'm sure that killing hundreds if not thousands of a repressed society that knowingly breeds fanatics would only breed more suicidal fanatics. Fanatics and freedom and security: choose two. The price of freedom is eternal vigilence - in this we will see the price of freedom, and the choice of the democratic countries to undermine that freedom and return to a draconian culture for the sake of security. (Fanatics are a constant here; few, if any, real actions have been taken to prevent fanatics.)

    12. Re:Hysteria by SirKron · · Score: 1

      True there are no winners in a war, except if we totally kick ass like we did in Desert Storm.

      From this moment on acts of terrorism should no longer be a judicial process but be considered exactly what they are, acts of war.

    13. Re:Hysteria by tringstad · · Score: 1

      Well put.

      --
      "I got a half gallon of Jack, and 2 dozen Ant Traps. I'm about to get wild." -me
    14. Re:Hysteria by jsnorman · · Score: 1

      "Turn the other cheek" is something we will be hearing for a long time from Europe and peace activists here in the U.S. "Take your time, don't overreact..." Or, "that is exactly what the terrorist wants" etc. etc. etc.

      So, what do you want to do? Nothing? Or perhaps we will find a handful of terrorists that we can prove responsible, extradite them to some neutral country, try them and lock them up.

      Then this will happen again, and again, and again, for the next hundred years -- UNLESS WE DO SOMETHING TO STOP IT NOW.

      So, what should we do?

      It is clear to me that any organization or country that announces a policy of Jihad against the United States (or any of our allies for that matter) is at WAR with the U.S. by their own admission. It matters not at all that they have or have not taken action (or for that matter whether we can prove it); an organization or country that has announced Jihad against the U.S. MUST BE ELIMINATED IN ITS ENTIRETY. There can be NO survivors of these organizations. PERIOD.

      Flame away ... but remember what happened in World War I, II, etc. We have to end this NOW.

    15. Re:Hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was "speak softly", not "walk softly"

    16. Re:Hysteria by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1
      Actually it was my .sig and it was abbreviated by the character limit. It was Twain who said:
      Man is the only animal that deals in that atrocity of atrocities, War. He is the only one that gathers his brethren about him and goes forth in cold blood and calm pulse to exterminate his kind. He is the only animal that for sordid wages will march out...and help to slaughter strangers of his own species who have done him no harm and with whom he has no quarrel. ..And in the intervals between campaigns he washes the blood off his hands and works for "the universal brotherhood of man"--with his mouth. - What Is Man?

      My .sig ended at "exterminate his kind." Back to the old one, I guess. Anyway, the point (to me) is that we should consider the atrocity only humans can inflict. Considering our intellect and self-appointed superiority as a species on this planet, it is ironic that we are capable of such acts.

  71. Fullscreen stream from N24 / Germany by g.a.g · · Score: 1

    I'm getting (all the time, full-screen capable) video from n24broadband.de. Now it's more analysis, but they have a synopsis every 15 minutes or so. This is amazing - they seem to be the only ones to hold up admirably. Of course, having only installed everything a few weeks ago helps... (get their stock while they're cheap!)

    --
    Hurricane Application Group, Dept of Meteorology Control, Ministry of Proactive Defense
  72. Didn't tom clancy write about this? by MikeLRoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't remember which book of his it was, but it started with a plane hitting the capitol building, and ended with biological attacks against the US.

    Thank goodness i'm canadian.

    --
    -Michael Roy Some people are like Slinkies. Not really useful, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down
    1. Re:Didn't tom clancy write about this? by xTown · · Score: 1
      "Debt of Honor" ended with a Japanese pilot slamming a 747 into the Capitol; "Executive Orders" began in the immediate aftermath of that attack and dealt with a subsequent BioWar against the US.


      Airliners, it is sadly true, make extremely effective weapons. A single SAM hit will not take one out, and it would take a few Sparrowhawks to do the job. Or so I've heard.

    2. Re:Didn't tom clancy write about this? by mqatrombone · · Score: 1

      Yep, he sure did. CNN even got him on the phone for their coverage this morning. He had a really good point, too: this was extremely well thought out and executed. I'm still not convinced it was a terroist attack. Like Clancy says in his more recent books, terrorism is a darwinian process, and the smart ones know better than to mess with the US military.

      --
      If 76 Trombones really led the big parade, why did they have anyone else in it?
    3. Re:Didn't tom clancy write about this? by IIH · · Score: 2

      I don't remember which book of his it was, but it started with a plane hitting the capitol building,

      It was called Executive Orders and the comparasion between today and the first chapter of the book is frightening.

      (First chapter is about a passagner plane from Japan being hijacked and blown up in captiol building.)

      --
      Exigo spamos et dona ferentes
  73. World Trade Live Account by CritterNYC · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can see where the towers of the trade center used to be from my bedroom on 14th St. I saw just after the second plane hit and just after the 1st tower fell. I watched the 2nd tower fall. One of my friends is still missing. I'm trying to keep myself busy. You can see pictures on my site.

    I'd estimate the death toll at betwen 20 and 50 thousand here. I believe approximately 40 thousand people work in the entire world trade complex and the attacks seem to be timed for just when everyone got work. I used to work in Tower 2, 15th Floor.

    I'll try and get a webcam up, too.

    1. Re:World Trade Live Account by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      Mirrored on my mirror page if your page gets too busy. I'm trying to mirror more sites about this. Please pass me any URLs to live video that I can put on our Real Media server.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  74. Even in the midsts of all this tragedy... by the_ph0x` · · Score: 1
    --

    ---
    ps -aux | grep mind
  75. Domain squatter works quickly by Len · · Score: 1

    Whoever owns the domain www.worldtradecenter.com has already put up a page saying "Domain available as memorial or for some other suitable purpose".

    Thanks to DanielV for pointing this out.

  76. An Act of War by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thank God we have a Texan in the white house who will know how to handle this. There is only one appropriate response to this: All out war. Some country either sponsored this, or allowed terrorists to live in their country (e.g., Afghanistan). Same thing, as far as I'm concerned. That country needs to be immediately taught what happens when you fuck with the United State of America.

    The full might and power of the US must be demonstrated to ensure this NEVER happens again. At least full invasion force, and in my current mood I'm not sure I'm even ruling out a nuclear response.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:An Act of War by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      Amen dude! When Ronald Reagan was President nobody *dared* to mess with us. We did not play nice with terrorists then. Same thing now.

    2. Re:An Act of War by jmarca · · Score: 1

      Shut up moron.

      I'm thinking too bad there is an imbecile in the white house because now he is going to flail about like a chicken with its head cut off.

    3. Re:An Act of War by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2
      There is only one appropriate response to this: All out war.[...]I'm not sure I'm even ruling out a nuclear response.

      Honestly, I tend to agree. But as with capital punishment, we need to make absolutely certain we know who to make war ON.

      The idea of turning terrorist-sponsoring countries into a gigantic glass parking lot with nukes does have some appeal, but remember that even in fairly radical countries there are going to be plenty of innocent populations that had nothing to do with terrorism.

      Personally, I think what's needed is something a bit more surgical than nukes. What needs to be destroyed is the political structure that fosters and supports the popularity of cowardly terrorist actions through propoganda and other cultural manipulation. That means particular individuals and organizations, and THEIR attendant facilities, with as little damage as possible to the potentially-sympathetic innocent, who will hopefully be left to take over where the radical freaks once ruled. If we just bomb the crap out of the whole area, we're just going to make MORE desperate enemies with plenty of popular support among survivors of our attacks who otherwise might have been sympathetic to us.

      There are also concerns on the domestic front - If all-out war pops out, will we see a repeat of WW-II era policies? "Loose lips sink ships"? (Better do something about that Internet thing!) Internment camps for USA citizens of IranIraqAfghjaniPakistani descent? Even more corporate welfare to suppliers of military supplies, such as munitions (which, I remind readers, includes cryptography and other "intellectual property" which has already spawned several out-of-control laws in the US).

      In short, what *I* hope happens is a well-conducted, very careful investigation to identify the organizations responsible for these acts, and careful, deliberate, surgical, but firm, thorough, and final wiping off of the face of the earth of those specific organizations....

    4. Re:An Act of War by townmouse · · Score: 1
      All out war. Some country either sponsored this, or allowed terrorists to live in their country (e.g., Afghanistan). Same thing, as far as I'm concerned. That country needs to be immediately taught what happens when you fuck with the United State of America.
      And you would endorse the same action over the Oklahoma City bombing?
      --
      Ask me if I've been required to disclose any crypto keys.
    5. Re:An Act of War by quartz · · Score: 2

      Now that would be a regrettable mistake. If the news sites are correct, these people are Islamic terrorists. They have nothing to lose and death does not scare them. They are organized and your war is not going to stop them. Before your military can find an annihilate them, they can and will do a lot more damage to American cities. War would only kill innocents, it won't touch terrorists the slightest bit.

    6. Re:An Act of War by John+F.+Ketamine · · Score: 1

      And what happens if the country that harbored such a criminal happens to be the good old US of A? Does your logic still hold? THINK!

      --
      "Upgrade your grey matter, 'cause one day it may matter." --Deltron Zero
    7. Re:An Act of War by ocie · · Score: 2

      McVeigh lived in the US, should we nuke ourselves?

      --
      JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    8. Re:An Act of War by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      i thought this was an excellent comment, till i realised the comment was not ironic and that you are actually serious.

      nukes? invade afghanistan? ???

      don't pour petrol on a burning fire.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    9. Re:An Act of War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      it will happen anyway, better hunt them down asap.

    10. Re:An Act of War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More american ppl died during each year of Reagan and Both bushes, then did during the ENTIRE time of clinton. Something to think about.

    11. Re:An Act of War by starman97 · · Score: 1

      Nope Gw's been packed of to Lousiana for a vacation while Cheny takes care of business..

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
  77. Re:i beleve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, frequently you do.

    And you wonder why so many people hate "America"?

  78. Latest CNN story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NEW YORK (CNN) -- Terrorists struck the United States Tuesday morning in harrowing, widespread attacks that included at least three commercial jet crashes into significant buildings.

    In the first attack, a plane hit the north tower of the World Trade Center in Manhattan shortly before 9 a.m., followed by another plane into the second tower about 20 minutes later. Both towers later collapsed.

    About an hour later, a plane crashed into the Pentagon, part of which later collapsed.

    American Airlines told CNN that it lost two planes in "tragic accidents:" Flight 11 from Boston with 81 passengers and 11 crew aboard and Flight 77 from Washington Dulles airport with 58 passengers and six crew aboard. Both planes were en route to Los Angeles

    United Airlines Flight 93 airliner headed from Newark, New Jersey, to San Francisco, crashed near Somerset, Pennsylvania -- police said initial reports indicated no survivors. United also confirmed the crash of Flight 175 from Boston to Los Angeles.

    The Pentagon, the White House, the State Department, the Justice Department, the Capitol, the CIA and all other government buildings in Washington evacuated.

    President Bush cancelled an appearance in Florida to return to Washington, calling the crashes "apparent terrorist attacks" and "a national tragedy."

    In the first ever national ground stop of aircraft, all flights nationwide have been stopped at their departure airports.

    All international flights were diverted to Canada.

    In New York, more than 10,000 rescue personnel rushed to the scene. The entire downtown area of Manhattan was evacuated as far north as Rockefeller Center, according to an official at an emergency command post.

    Israel has evacuated all its missions around the world.

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta was evacuated. CDC was preparing bioterrorism teams in case they become necessary.

    Philadelphia landmarks were also evacuated.

    In Chicago, the Sears Tower was evacuated; United Nations in New York evacuated.

    The New York Port Authority said it had closed all bridges and tunnels into the city.

    U.S. stock markets were closed after the New York attacks.

  79. Webcam showing Pentagon building burning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.camcentral.com/camviewer.asp?script=sta te&item=WashingtonDC&page=1&id=7464

  80. Re:Death to Muslim fanatics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Matthew,

    This is not the time for such insensitive and frankly irresponble posting. It is attitudes like this that cause things to get worse.

    If you have personally lost during this then my feelings go out to you....

    AC

  81. SkyNews holding up well by byoon · · Score: 1
  82. well.. aside from today being 911 (9/11/01)... by Negative_Earth · · Score: 0

    nothing really major, aside from a British mandate of Palistine and the overthrow of Elected government in Chile with US support.

    History Today, 9/11

    --
    [insert humourous sig here]
  83. A state of war, but with whom ? by beanerspace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's clear, by now, that we're in a state of war. But unlike Perl Harbor, where the enemy was easily identifiable, we now must figure out who's responsible.

    I've always felt terrorists were chicken-shits. I've got friends and relatives who work both in the Trade Center, and the Pentagon. Regular family people. Moms with kids in school. Dads who surf about /. Little kids on field trips.

    Terrorist == Cowards

  84. Local site with info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deseret News has been updating their site, and I have had no problem getting in. www.desnews.com

  85. HANGUP IF YOU'RE ON A DIALUP IN MARYLAND!!! by strredwolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    State police have asked folks to limit phone usage in the state of Maryland. Please limit your useage, and tune into local TV stations (2, 11, 13) for more information.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  86. New York site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to www.newyork.com.

    It's up and has a synopsis of everything so far. Being update fairly quickly as well from local Fox News.

  87. Awakening the sleeping giant by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 1, Redundant
    This will clearly wind up being this generation's Pearl Harbor.

    I'm glad Timothy McVeigh's not alive to see it.

    1. Re:Awakening the sleeping giant by John+F.+Ketamine · · Score: 1

      I'm glad Timothy McVeigh's not alive to see it.

      Now, that is an insightful comment. MOD UP!

      --
      "Upgrade your grey matter, 'cause one day it may matter." --Deltron Zero
  88. Taleban, Arafat condemn by riggwelter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Reported on CBS MarketWatch: the Taleban ambassador to Pakistan has condemned this.

    I'm watching BBC News 24, and Arafat has also condemned this, saying he was deeply shocked.

    --
    Listening for the sound of the coming rain...
    1. Re:Taleban, Arafat condemn by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      And you believe them?!?! Frankly, Mr. Arafat should be checking his 6, I would think the IDF may have something for him. As for the Taleban... they are a cancer on this planet. I'll leave it to your imagination what needs to happen to a cancer.

    2. Re:Taleban, Arafat condemn by Quixote · · Score: 1
      Of course the Taleban will "condemn" this. The people who are to blame for this incident are (in order of responsibility):
      • Osama Bin Laden: only he has the kind of terrorist muscle to pull such a stunt off
      • Taleban "Government": by harboring OBL, they are protecting him and his ilk
      • Government of Pakistan: they keep Taleban in power; they circumvent UN resolutions and keep pumping arms and money into Afghanistan

      The US should bomb the Taleban beyond the stone age (they are already in the stone age there). Next, the US should arrest and try the dictator of Pakistan, General Musharraf, for the Taleban are his brainchild.
    3. Re:Taleban, Arafat condemn by kot · · Score: 1

      Did you see the reports of palestinians dancing in the streets?
      What is Arafat supposed to say? He wants America to help him.

  89. San Francisco news. by juuri · · Score: 3, Informative

    * One plane on the way to SF is down near Pittsburg (Flight 193)

    * TransAmerica building closed.

    * Public buildings closed.

    * Schools closed.

    * Police in a high state of alert.

    * Bridges ARE open.

    * Public Transit IS open.

    * All airports are of course closed.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
    1. Re:San Francisco news. by Fatal0E · · Score: 1

      which city are you talking about?

  90. Most Useful Site by j_tynefield · · Score: 1

    The most useful, concise, and ( for now ) responsive sites I've found is Strategic Forecasting ( http://www.stratfor.com ).

    ..taco

  91. wake the sleeping giant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan had to learn the hard way after attacking us. Perhaps now others will learn. You mess with the bull you get the horns. We'll turn the middle east into glass with out nukes! Good bye middle east!

  92. Inside Job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be nigh on impossible to hijack 2 AA jets at the same time and score direct hits on both trade centre buildings?

    Looking from the outside I can envisage it would be very easy of 'friends' of McVeigh infiltrating the airline industry...think about that before necessarily jumping to conclusions about Palestinians/Libyans/Iraqis/Afgans/Irish/Basques/W hatever.

    My thoughts are with you all.

  93. Cancelled Blood Drive Here... by Conesus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd donate blood of course, but unfortunatly, at my high school, they have just put in a lock-down for the day, and have cancelled the blood drive that was happening from the beginning of this morning.

    Just consider the irony.

    --

    Don't eat your soul to fill your belly.
    conesus.com
  94. Something like this foretold by Tom Clancy? by Hertog · · Score: 1

    I can't get the image out of my mind that this is very simmilar to Executive Orders by Tom Clancy..

    Think I heard that military went to Delta?

    Damn, US-Asians, I wish you all the best in the coming times!

    --
    -=- I heard rumours about an OS called "Social Life", heard of it? Is it stable? -=-
  95. Today is 9-11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or 911. coincidence?

  96. September 11 = S11? by gribbly · · Score: 1

    One of the first things that struck me as a I watched the CNN coverage was the date - September 11th.

    In Australia there was a very large protest in Melbourne called S11 on September 11th, 2000.

    It was one of the global anti-WTO protests -- this one coincided with the Global Economic Forum, and it's stated aim was to disrupt the meeting (mission accomplished, AFAIK). I'm not sure whether S11 took place in other places in the world.

    The "official" site is here.

    Frankly I think it's probably just a co-incidence. The chief target (World Trade Center) suits the politics, but taking the lives of two planeloads of innocent people (condolences where appropriate -- I can't think of anything more horrible) does not.

    grib.

    --
    maybe
  97. You sick bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you say something like this when tens of thousands of people have died???!

    1. Re:You sick bastard by TRS-80 · · Score: 1
      Hey! I didn't put the item up for auction - it was just MLP, and a comment on how long it takes for jokes to be generated about tragic events.

      Seriously, this is a damn sucky and tragic event :-(

  98. KAMIKAZE by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

    It's modern time kamikaze.

    Imperial Japan only hit the shore 50 years ago -
    and this time finally at the heart of the America.

    50 years after, there will be some silly "pearl harbor"-like movie.

  99. Pentagon hit again by benspionage · · Score: 0

    Another aircraft (a Jumbo) has just hit the Pentagon

  100. US embassy in Stockholm closed by bringert · · Score: 1

    [from http://www.dn.se, translated from swedish]

    The american embassy in Stockholm was closed earlier today after the terrorist attacks in the USA. The embassy has turned to the swedish police for additional security.

    - As any american, as any human being, you are very ... when you see the World Trade Center coming down, says Viktor Sidabras, press secrectary of the american embassy.

    He won't speculate as to who is responsible for theses acts of terror.

    - As president Bush said in his speech we will hunt down and catch those responsible for this, he says.

    Viktor Sidabras believes that the US embassy will open again tomorrow, Tuesday.

    [end of DN story]

    According to swedish TV there are roadblocks around the embassy.

  101. Say a prayer... by cmpgn · · Score: 1

    ...for the loss of life and loved ones, but also for the impending loss of personal freedoms and liberties.

  102. Check www.google.com frontpage by Kingpin · · Score: 1


    Link to cache from there.

    --
    Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
    Geocrawler error message.
  103. Pictures by Gnight · · Score: 1

    Again, pictures can be found here

    This is mostly of the WTC in New York, and is not meant to be off topic, but the other thread is getting overloaded :(

    here is the URL again:

    http://www.arctic.org/~trockij/wtc/

  104. Re:Microsoft to Rebuild the Towers by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

    You think this is funny!?

  105. attn moderators. by imipak · · Score: 2

    PLEASE, mod up parent; this is spot on.

  106. Chicago OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No attacks in Chicago just to clarify, but all of downtown has been evacuated...everything is closed....

    people, do whatever you can to help, give blood, donate whatever you can...this is insanity...

    I pray that those responsible pay.......and if that sentence about Arabs celebrating is true, well whatever god you worship help your pitiful souls because no one, no country, no matter how much you might hate them, deserves this.

  107. WHO NEEDS ALIENS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs aliens to attack us, when we have TERRORISTS!

  108. 'Star Wars' defence system anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said

  109. United Airlines crash by FFFish · · Score: 2

    United Airlines 757 has crashed. This is the one that was "missing," not the Pennsylvania plane. Looks to be in Colorado. :-(

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  110. Funding for agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone want to reasses their opinion about whether or not the NSA is equipped to deal with current threats? It looks like we were caught unaware this morning.

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/09/08/0121 25 0&mode=thread

  111. pics mirrored by -=Izzy=- · · Score: 1

    I have some pics of the incident here

    i will post more as i get them in.

  112. Dooms Day Plane by Overdrive_SS · · Score: 1

    Apparently they are putting George W on the Dooms Day plane. A plane they designed for the President in case of a nuclear attack. He can command the military forces and stay in the air for extended periods of time, is what they are saying. That is all I could pick up from the news.

    1. Re:Dooms Day Plane by Slynkie · · Score: 1

      I thought Air Force One was supposed to be capable of controlling the country, and staying up for long periods of time, etc??

      I still can't believe this is happening...

      And as much as I can't stand Dubya, I sure hope to hell that he stays safe.

  113. Chicago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm here in Chicago and I go to work at 9:30.
    Basically NORTHBOUND Lake shore drive out of downtown was bumper to bumper at 9:30 am (usually it's empty (I work south of the city and have to pass through as all the major expressways go there). The John Hancock, Merchandise Mart, Sears Tower, and all major buildings downtown are being evacuated. Any bet that missing plane going from Boston to LA is going to try to go down here? Seems logical as we are in the middle of the route and are a major trade center.

  114. The end of privacy in America. by Netlurker · · Score: 1

    The actions reported so far are a horrible tragedy, and unfortunately not the last in all probability. But a more ominous tragedy will follow soon behind, this is the end of privacy in America. We have watched Europe implement vastly sweeping regulation over encryption and other privacy technologies, now watch the US legislators jump into action over the next few weeks.

  115. does anyone remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that palistenian fsck on CNN serveral weeks ago who said that America was going to pay for Israils aggression?

    It was a man-in-the-street (actually, man-at-a-protest) type of interview. Obviously these guys are clued into some sort of propaganda machine that the US intelligence agency seemed to have overlooked.

    ...and that silly fsck in the whitehouse wants to build a missle shield...

  116. Not quite 60 years ago .. by kd5biv · · Score: 1

    "September 11, 2001 .. a date which will live in infamy .."

    --


    73 de N5VB (ex-KD5BIV) AR SK
  117. Howard Stern Is Still broadcasting. by JK+Flip+Flop · · Score: 1

    Howard is still on (he probably can't leave) he is in the center of it all so its a great new source at the moment.

    1. Re:Howard Stern Is Still broadcasting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in Chicago...WCKG is simulcasting CBS2 News because the Prudential building has been evacuated.

  118. Bad Geography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has now become known that the planes were actually heading for Redmond. Someone somewhere is going to make sure that his henchmen are better map readers and will *not* use PocketPC-based map-programmes in the future.

  119. Another by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 1

    Ananova has been online and reliable all afternoon (British time).

    -Stephen

  120. It gets eerier: by symplegades · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The UN 4 Kids site: What is the International Day of Peace? The International Day of Peace is observed each year on the opening day of the regular session of the United Nations General Assembly.

    According to the Boston Metro, today is International Peace Day.

    -Rene

    --

    See you on the playa.

  121. livecam from manhattan... by ferkelparade · · Score: 1

    ...at Bionicsonics

    This might sound cynical, but I'm pretty happy whoever did this decided to go for symbolic rather than effective attacks (destroying WTC and the Pentagon as symbols of perceived US supremacy)...imagine these planes hitting nuclear power plants...

    --
    frotz grue
  122. Mexico by zpengo · · Score: 2

    Border with Mexico was just shut down.

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  123. News From Tokyo --- by chrispy666 · · Score: 1

    I just came to tokyo 3 days ago.... we had a terrible typhoon yesterday. and Because of this NYC attack, Japan authorities decided to shutdown Narita Airport, and secure all tall buildings in Tokyo and Yokohama, I'm watching TV right now, and the anchorman is just reading a LOOOOONG list of japanese banks and services present in the US that are being shutdown. This is bad ....

    --
    Music is the language of the heart, the sound of the soul. -Joe Satriani
  124. MIRROR site with PICS and VIDEO by ender- · · Score: 2

    http://www.spack.nu/wtc

    here is a mirror with pics that seem to have been taken from a digital camera.

    As well as video of a plane hitting a tower and one of the towers collapsing.

    I wish my server luck...

    ender-

  125. More on Taleban/Bin-Laden by riggwelter · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Taleban have said that Osama Bin-Laden could not have been involved in this (BBC News 24)

    Remember that groups with an interest here are at some point going to be queuing up to claim responsibility (the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine already have - CBS MarketWatch) so use a small pinch of salt for that one...

    --
    Listening for the sound of the coming rain...
    1. Re:More on Taleban/Bin-Laden by naasking · · Score: 1

      Remember that groups with an interest here are at some point going to be queuing up to claim responsibility (the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine already have - CBS MarketWatch)

      Whoever does won't be around for much longer.

  126. over here part III by psych031337 · · Score: 1

    probably last comment from me today...

    German military is in high alert as reported, divisions are currently moving out to protect the capital Berlin and the Bundestag (read: german White House) located there.

    This is damn serious. Additionally equipment and materials are in the process of being turned over to other NATO forces.

    --
    +++ath0
  127. I hope... by joss · · Score: 2

    There will be a lot of pressure for punitive revenge attacks against suspected parties.

    Doubtless this will happen, it is inconceivable that the US will allow this to go unpunished. For instance, after the attacks on several US embassies in Africa, the US bombed one of the only two pharmaceutical factories in Sudan on faulty intelligence info. Unfortunately it turned out that this factory was legitimate and this just led to the death of many innocent workers, plus many further deaths as a result of a lack of medicine.

    When these revenge attacks occur, more innocent civilians will die. I just hope that Americans remember that the bombing of innocent civilians is wrong even when they are foreigners. I don't hold out much hope of this - when the revenge bombing occurs, I expect it will be greeted with jubliation, even though there will be a tenuous connection at best between those who die and those responsible for the atrocities in New York and Washington. It is appropriate to feel anger towards those responsible for the murder of innocents, but don't let that anger reduce you to "their" level.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  128. Getting news - audi stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm getting a solid Audio Stream from WNYC. New York's NPR station.

    http://www.wnyc.org/audioindex/wnycam.asx

    I'm uptown from the NYC attack. It is quite surreal. The smoke and debris are viewable all over the city. There is little or no transportation. People are walking everywhere.

    As I walked down Park Ave I could see the plume of smoke and in the foreground seemingly floating above the grey shadows, an American Flag.

  129. Good news site by ccaroon · · Score: 1

    http://www.nandotimes.com &

    http://www.nandotimes.com/special_reports/terror is m/

  130. Canada shut down by huh_ · · Score: 1

    Canadian airlines have been shut down too. And the Sears tower in Toronto has also been shut down.

  131. Nostradamus says... by the_ph0x` · · Score: 1

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while
    the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb", "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning"

    - Nostradamus 1654

    --

    ---
    ps -aux | grep mind
    1. Re:Nostradamus says... by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      Oh fuck off you ignorant bastard. Show some respect. Don't be a fuckwit all your life.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  132. what's disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "CNN showing footage of arabs celebrating."

    how FUCKED UP is that -- even look at it from their side -- say you hate the fact that we provide support for israel to slaughter and treat them terribly -- no one CELEBRATES.

    im talking to a girl i know online right now. she cant get in touch with her best friend or mom. both were in the vicinity. how could someone possibly celebrate this.

    no matter how much you hate the united states, our 'barbaric' celebrations and holidays dont come anywhere near sheer joy at mass killing.

    1. Re:what's disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not many people know or care when Palestinians die. Your corporatised media is so scared of being seen as being pro-Palestinian that you never see it. In the meantime, US foreign policy supports Israel almost unconditionally in its attempts to keep Palestinian discontent quiet. You're suddenly surprised that some Palestinians rejoice that the US suddenly finds out what indiscriminate killing is like from the dying end? Somehow, I'm not.

  133. Aircraft Carriers by Overdrive_SS · · Score: 1

    They also reported that they are deploying an aircraft carrier to New York and one as close to DC as they can to supply air cover. I couldn't catch the names of the carriers dispatched.

  134. Philadelphia, PA shutting down by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    In a scene probably being duplicated in other so-far-untouched major U.S. cities, most of the businesses in downtown Philadelphia, especially the ones in tall buildings, are closing or are already closed.

    All city public and parochial schools are closing at noon local time, which has just passed as I write this.

    Most people you pass on the street look furious, nauseous, or both.

    The Liberty Bell and Independence Mall historical areas are shut down tight.

    Mass transit has everything on the street and tracks that it can manage right now to get people home quickly.

    This is like something out of a God damned nightmare. I can only hope retribution is swift, violent, and preferably nuclear-- 'no-first-use' declaration be damned.

    ~Philly

  135. Not "hysteria", "state of emergency" by mblase · · Score: 2

    Of *course* they're going to lock us down. Airports are halted across the country, transportation at the attack sites is paralyzed, and communication there is impossible. Right now, don't expect to fly anywhere anytime soon. This isn't an attack on personal freedom; it's practical safety measures. The first plane that hit the WTC was going from Boston to Los Angeles; another plane could come from *anywhere*.

    The terrorists won't "re-retaliate" for a long, long time -- they know we're on alert now, any more "sneak attacks" would be futile. The thing to do now is make sure no more planes can be used as bombs, then find out who's responsible, and then DEMAND that he be dealt with. Right now, I don't give a crap if his host country wants to extradite him or not. If a government is going to protect whoever's responsible for this, then they're complicit, and they're inviting war. Not hysteria; a practial and well-earned response.

    No one's talking about locking the entire country down with martial law yet, if that's what you're worried about. But some restrictions are very necessary, and anyone with a sense of the big picture should be all for it.

    1. Re:Not "hysteria", "state of emergency" by Ripat · · Score: 1

      Well, temporary safety restrictions are not the problem.

      The problem comes when people start to think about ways to make sure that this will not happen again. It would be very easy to go to far.

    2. Re:Not "hysteria", "state of emergency" by FFFish · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm talking about personal freedoms lockdown -- goodbye encryption, goodbye privacy. This is the administration's opportunity to make some giant strides in the anti-freedom direction they've taken over the past decade.

      Re: terrorist retaliation -- point is, they will retaliate, and will up the ante each time. Last time, it was a car bomb under the WTC. This time, the destruction of the WTC. Next, a nuke in the heart of NYC.

      It's necessary to think long-term. The terrorist organizations will wait a decade if they need to. Time is immaterial.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  136. Re:The Pittsburgh Crash UPDATE by ackthpt · · Score: 2
    38 passengers, 7 crew, Flight 93 from Newark to SFO.


    God be with them.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  137. I don't care who you are.... by Achernar · · Score: 1

    ... but you DO NOT do this to the American people.

    I truly believe that no one in the world really understands the capacity of this country to make war and to completely, totally, and irreversibly give you a new bodily orifice.

    I'm sure that a lot of people agree with me on this one - we need to not be the country of wussies we usually are with this. This situation demands swift and severe response from us in any way possible. We've known for a while that something like this was on the way, but we've never stopped to think about how we would respond.

    *IF* Bin Laden is responsible, he needs to go. We've known where he is, he's very vocal about what he says he wants to do to our country and our people, and we think he's just blowing smoke up our ass. This should show that people who say things like this and have the resources to pull it off should be taken seriously and dealt with pre-emptively *before* we face a day of reckoning like this. Keep in mind that what I say here is valid only *if* he's responsible, even though I think we should still be scared of him.

    The people who have done this to our people and our country deserve slow death on public television. This deserves retaliation, *not* diplomacy.

    I'm open to criticism of my opinion, and maybe I'm just speaking out of good old American rage, but when all this was occurring, I began to think that I'm surprised no one set off a nuke in the middle of all this in one or more major cities.

    >

    The last words of mankind will *not* be, "The secret name of God is...," but, "What does *this* button do?

    1. Re:I don't care who you are.... by N3P1u5U17r4 · · Score: 0

      Retaliation on a large scale is trouble. Can anyone say WW3???

      There are no winners here. Retaliation will only make things worse.

      --
      You're Just Jealous Because The Voices Are Talking To Me.
    2. Re:I don't care who you are.... by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      How arrogant to single out Americans as those who shouldn't have to deal with something like this, and even more so is using the country's capacity for retribution as the basis for your argument.

      This sort of thing happens all over the world; lives are lost on a massive scale every day. We should all be horrified if something like this happened to anyone; not just Americans. And definitely not just because the country can "give you a new bodily orifice."

  138. Palestinians in West Bank celebrate attacks on U.S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Palestinians in West Bank celebrate attacks on U.S.

    By Amos Harel, Ha'aretz Correspondent and Agencies


    Palestinians across the West Bank on Tuesday celebrated the series ofaircraft attacks on New York and Washington. There were scenes of celebration in the West Bank cities of Nablus, Tul Karm, Bethlehem and the Balata refugee camp.


    While Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat condemned the attacks which levelled the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City and struck the Pentagon in Washington, hundreds of Palestinians distributed sweets in Nablus.


    "I feel I am in a dream. I never believed that one day the United States would come to pay a price for its support to Israel," said Mustafa, a 24-year-old Palestinian gunman.


    Several dozen Palestinian youths gathered in East Jerusalem to celebrate as well, honking out wedding tunes on their car horns. "We are so happy thatAmerica was hit. America is against us in supporting Israel," Suleiman, one of the demonstrators, said.

    In Nablus, motorists honked their horns and gunmen fired into the air from assault rifles to cheer on the attacks which unfolded in the space of a few hours.

  139. Cell phones down by The+Fast+Choker · · Score: 1

    Many cell phones are down in the NY-NJ area since the WTC was the transmitter/receiver for many of them.

    Also, cell phone service in DC area has been shut down due to the fear of cell phone activated bombs.

    Trying to help keep a heads up in this grim situation.

    --


    nWo 4 Life
  140. ITEM: USA has lots of enemies by T.Hobbes · · Score: 1

    Bin Laden can't and shouldn't be automatically blamed for every terrorist act against the US. He may have been involved - but it's been three hours since the whole pile of shit began, and you can't know yet who or what organization did this. Jumping to conclusions is unproductive, unhelpful, prejudicial and leads to the sort of thing which happend today (not, let it be clear, that anything could ever justify these acts).

  141. FALSE REPORT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a false report!!!

    As of 12:10PM EDT there has been only ONE hit at the Pentagon.

  142. NOT a quote from Nostradamus by gregor_b_dramkin · · Score: 1

    If he had bothered to read the context, the original poster would realize that the author of the quote was the author of the webpage. The point was to show how vague the prophecies are and how they are subject to ipso facto interperation:

    here's the context from the webpage

    If I make say a thousand prophecies that are fairly abstract for example:

    In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb

    Well let us analyse this.
    [snip]

    Note the 'I' in the first sentence.

    --
    You can never equivocate too much.
  143. Where is Bush?: by joecool12321 · · Score: 1
    President Bush is returning from a flight to Florida. He is calling it "apparent terrorist attack" and ordered a full scale investigation.


    This attack is the most deadly attack on the U.S. mainland in modern history.


    All government buildings in Washington are closed. All "tall buildings" are being evacuated. All commercial flights are grounded. (anyone have info on commuter or small-engine flights?)


    All planes appear to have been hijacked, one from Boston and one from Washington.


    That is all I know from reputable sources. It appears there may have been futher explostions, but whether they were seperate attacks or not is unclear.


    "There was no advance warning of this," the official said on condition of anonymity. (Reuters)

    I find that hard to believe. I'm still waiting to hear from friends -- all circuts are busy both on land and cell lines.

    --Joey

    1. Re:Where is Bush?: by deanj · · Score: 1

      That statement from Bush was almost immediately after the hits on the towers, and came after he was visiting school children in Florida. He gave a statement, and then headed for Air Force on, to go to Washington.

    2. Re:Where is Bush?: by LazloHollyfeld · · Score: 1

      W just landed in Shreveport Louisiana. The time is 12:42pm...

    3. Re:Where is Bush?: by Kez · · Score: 1

      >He is calling it "apparent terrorist attack"

      He also called it a "terrible tourist attack"?

      Are you still sure you want him in power?

    4. Re:Where is Bush?: by lunatik17 · · Score: 2

      He just landed here at Offut Air Force Base in Bellevue, NE just outside of Omaha. Dunno if he plans on staying here or moving on to somewhere else.

      --

      Here's my DeCSS mirror, where's yours?

  144. wtca.org - was this server housed in the wtca? by markymark.net · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if this server was housed inside the World Trade Centre?

    Was there webcams inside? is there any footage from them?

  145. Attack on the free world by kiwaiti · · Score: 1
    Throughout Europe, governments have expressed their shock and compassion with the victims and their families.

    The attacks are considered a declaration of war to all the free world, denying the very base of humanity.

    We are all with you.

    Kiwaiti

    --
    Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
  146. robots.cnn.com by [amorphis] · · Score: 1

    robots.cnn.com is up and responsive with the latest info

  147. Hmmm by zpengo · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's times like this that make me glad we have a Republican and a Texan in the White House. If there's ass to be kicked, he'll see to it.

    I would hate to see Al Gore's response to this.

    --


    Got Rhinos?
    1. Re:Hmmm by nagora · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Ah, the good old Republican response: talk shit.

      The problem is that Bush will kick the first ass he sees and the real criminals will be ignored. Fat lot of help that is.

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:Hmmm by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
      Like it or not, the majority of the people Texas has executed were actually guilty of the crime for which they were put to death.


      Both Republicans and Democrats talk shit, but at least we now have a president who is willing to walk the walk.

    3. Re:Hmmm by starman97 · · Score: 1

      Kindof would suck to be in the minority of those who were executed for crimes they did NOT commit eh??

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
  148. Them or US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vote them

  149. Simply awful by TrollMan+5000 · · Score: 1

    My brother works in Brooklyn and had a good view of the towers. After hearing the first impact, his entire office (Bear Stearns) went to see what went on. Then the whole office got to see the second crash, and the subsequent collapses.

    I have family in NYC, and thankfully they are alright. Phone service is sporadic, all bridges and tunnels have been shut down, as well as the entire NYC subway system. My brother and brother-in-law are stranded in Manhattan.

  150. Is there anything significant about the date? by SnicklesTheElf · · Score: 1

    When was the previous Bin Laden attack? Is it some sort of religious day? Specific year?

  151. Terrorism Calendar of Significant Dates by UnBlinking · · Score: 1
    "The Calendar of Significant Dates is compiled from data from the U.S. Department of State and other sources."

    http://www.terrorism.com/calendar/September.html

    Since this page is almost impossibly slow to load just now, perhaps relevant excerpts:

    09/09/1993
    Middle East
    PLO-Israeli Mutual Recognition
    The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Israel signed a mutual recognition agreement.

    09/13/1993
    Middle East
    Israeli-PLO Peace Pact
    Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) signed a peace agreement in Washington, D.C. outlining a plan for Palestinian self-rule in the Israeli-occupied territories.

    GS http://www.unblinking.com

    1. Re:Terrorism Calendar of Significant Dates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Today was the day the camp david peace accord was signed in 1978

  152. From Red Cross website (1-800-GIVE-LIFE) by seregine · · Score: 1

    Apologies to Red Cross for copying from their website: (http://www.redcross.org/news/ds/0109wtc/010911wtc _02.html)

    Red Cross Responds to World Trade Center, Pentagon and Pittsburgh Plane Crashes

    Security atop buildings near the White House in Washington DC stand ready for any possible attacks.
    September 11, 2001 -- Two aircraft collided into the upper floors of the World Trade Center towers Tuesday morning (Sept. 11), and black smoke poured out of two gaping holes in the buildings. Both towers collapsed a short while after the explosions.
    There was no immediate word on injuries or fatalities in the World Trade Center disasters, which happened around 9 a.m.

    Shortly thereafter, a plane reportedly collided into the Pentagon in Arlington, Va.
    Yet another plan crashed outside Pittsburgh, about an hour after the Pentagon crash. It is still unclear if this crash is related to the others.
    The Federal Aviation Administration has reportedly shut down all airports in the nation.
    CNN reported that the FBI is investing reports that the planes were hijacked. One of the planes was reportedly an American Airlines 767.
    The American Red Cross has immediately responded to the disasters. Details are sketchy as to what has actually occurred, but the Red Cross has activated its Aviation Incident Response (AIR) Team to respond in New York City, and trained disaster workers from the American Red Cross of Greater New York and the National Capitol Chapter in Washington, D.C. are providing relief in the affected areas.
    80,000 blood donations in the American Red Cross blood inventory are ready to ship to affected areas and will ensure that patients' lives are saved. Donors who wish to give blood in the coming days to replenish the nation's blood supply are encouraged to call 1-800-GIVE-LIFE to make an appointment.
    In the wake of these traumatic events lies a wide path of catastrophic physical and psychological destruction in which countless victims will require assistance. In addition to meeting the physical needs of the affected regions, the American Red Cross will be providing crisis mental health counseling.
    The Red Cross AIR Team has been activated and is responding in New York City and Boston, where one of the flights that struck the World Trade Center originated. Made up of leadership teams from all Red Cross disaster relief functions, the AIR Team responds when activated through the Aviation Disaster Family Assistance Act of 1996. This act charged the National Transportation Safety Board with designating an organization to provide for the emotional needs of victims, family members and rescue workers. NTSB selected the American Red Cross because of our nationally recognized mental health counseling program.
    A representative from the Keystone Chapter in Johnston, Pa., (the chapter closest to the plane crash outside Pittsburgh), said that a disaster action team has been mobilized. Additionally, meals are being prepared to be distributed to relief workers and victims at the scene.

  153. why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well usa needs to ask itself why is this happening in the usa and not in england or some other european country. could it be that usa is terrorising korea, iran, iraq and other countries and that they are simple revenging for deads of thousands of their own people that usa causes every year.

  154. "Thousands of Palestinians celebrating" by Augusto · · Score: 1

    Can you belive this ?!?!?!

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/2001 0911/aponline114906_000.htm

    > - Thousands of Palestinians celebrated Tuesday's terror attacks in the United States, chanting "God is Great" and distributing candy to passers-by, even as their leader, Yasser Arafat, said he was horrified.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  155. Official Afganistan Government Website by nwetters · · Score: 1

    If they're going to say anything, it'll appear here.

  156. I'm sorry.... by metlin · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm sorry to say this, but in many ways US deserves this 100%

    You see, when Pakistan attacked India, or when Palestines bombed Israel, your govt. was talking about bilateral talks and all that crap.

    Now I'd like to see how you ppl would "talk it out".

    When terrorist nations like Pakistan and Afghanistan are housing a million terrorist groups like Hizbul Mujahideen, Lakshar-e-Taiba etc, and when these guys openly bombed New Delhi, the US Govt self righteously proclaimed that it has "faith" in Pakistan and other fundamentalist countries, and it would contain further such incidents.

    Infact, despite a lot of evidence, US refuses to declare Pakistan and a host of other nations as terrorist nations.

    I'd like to see you people "talk it out." I really would.

    And hey, if any of the moderators think of this as a troll, I'm very sorry. You are just being hypocritical.

    Remember this - a lot of countries - esp. India and Israel did the mistake of letting "freedom" movements out of hands that blew into enormous explosions right on their faces. Just ensure that this does not happen to you. Please.

    Thank you.

  157. UK Foreign Office emergency phone number. by jonathan_atkinson · · Score: 1

    It's a London number. If you are worried about friends or family, you should call

    0201 008 0000

    May god bless those affected.

    --jon

    --
    Cleanstick.org: Dumb weblog about nothing
  158. My thoughts.. by Coleco · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Every American should think about the following:

    What horrors would one had to commit to provoke such an attack? Don't assume a true heart of evil in those terrorists. Even with my less-than-exhastive knowledge of US foreign policy, such acts don't seem entirely unforeseen.

    Which brings me to my next point:

    Do the comments by former important NATO dude et Al.. seem somewhat blaise and unsurprised? Why is this? I see two cases, either they've been preparing for this sort of attack for quite some time and it final happen regardless of the safeguards .. or .. these attempts have been happening unbeknownst to public and the security agencies have been sticking their fingers in a dam that's about to collapse..

    Which brings me to my final point..

    I certainly hope that this is the end and not the beginning. The US is a prideful and patriotic country. If the president and military leaders value the safety and lives of their people, perhaps compassion and sober reflection for the innocents thus killed is in order, and not prideful, vengeful crys of bloodlust.

    1. Re:My thoughts.. by bonneyrwk · · Score: 1

      Who could EVER justify an attack like this.... They should hunt down the people responsible and destroy them!

      --
      new to linux, but would like to learn as much as i can :)
    2. Re:My thoughts.. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      I'm waiting for major US cities to become fortresses; as the US realises that they are no longer impenetrable, air defence systems and rapid-deployment strike systems will slowly become the norm for Washington, New York, SF, etc.

      Missle-defence? Maybe ... but we need a way to defend ourselves against people on the inside too.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:My thoughts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What horrors would one had to commit to provoke such an attack? Don't assume a true heart of evil in those terrorists. Even with my less-than-exhastive knowledge of US foreign policy, such acts don't seem entirely unforeseen.

      Oh.. not much more than thwarting a madman's 'Divine Inspiration' to overthrow Saddam Hussein and form "The NEw Islaam" by setting up camp in Saudi Arabia... Jackass.

  159. No. by einhverfr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Biological and chemical terrorism is something which is a bit of a boogey-man. We will probably never see a devestating attack using these means because they are simply too costly. However, the threat of a threat could be effective (in other words a claim is more important than the reality).

    Now, there are a few things that have occurred to me about these events:

    1: The planes must have been flown by the terrorists into the buildings. I have a hard time believing that a pilot of an airliner would be at the helm and be a part of such an attack.

    2: This is an attack which would have been very difficult for a small organization to pull off. A large support organization would have been necessary for the necessary piloting expertise and intellegence work. Although this could have been state-sponsored, there is no reason at this time to think that it was.

    3: One cannot adequately protect against suicide terrorists. There are too many otherwise inocuous items which can be, under the right circumstances, lethal weapons. The only defense against suicide terrorists is attack the morale of their organizations.

    The reason why I suspect that this attack originated in the Middle East is that they are the only region of the world which a) has suffered enough at the hands of Europe and America to create that sort of response and b) has the resources at their disposal for such an attack. (Yes, I have studied my Middle East history, and a should point out that Britain was probably more a part of the problem than the US, but the US has been the present main player in the region).

    IMO, we will eventually have to adopt a different policy toward the OPEC nations which aims to foster their economic independence (and live with the higher oil prices) or come to terms with the fact that low oil prices will be bought with human lives. Terrorism is expensive both in lives of supporters and in material resources, and this attack indicates that we as a country (America) have not adequately targeted the morale and/or finances of the terrorist organizations.

    Don't get me wrong. I think that terrorism should be fully prosecuted etc. and I think that people who use innocent victims as weapons against a larger enemy deserve no respect, I think that, for the sake of security, we need to create a comprehensive plan which aims not only at attacking the actual terrorists, but also reducing the support they have from economically powerful people by responding to some of the root economical realities which have fostered terrorism in many areas of the world (but especially the Middle East).

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:No. by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 2
      1: The planes must have been flown by the terrorists into the buildings. I have a hard time believing that a pilot of an airliner would be at the helm and be a part of such an attack

      Two commercial pilots have been reported to have crashed their planes deliberately in recent years - those of SilkAir flight MI-185 on 19th December 1997 and of EgyptAir flight 990 on 31st October 1999 (both still disputed).

    2. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I have studied my Middle East history, and a should point out that Britain was probably more a part of the problem than the US...

      As a Brit, I tend to blame the French. But it's so refreshing to find an American who has studied any history, I won't make a big thing of it.

    3. Re:No. by hklingon · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to popular economists now-- oil isn't the issue at all. OPEC oil tycoons actually have huge investments in American corporations and benefit indirectly from the sales of their oil. They don't actually see much profit at all from selling the oil, but from industry that flourishes here from that oil, and any other investments they have.

      In other words, using their oil to ensure our strong economy helps ensure the growth of their investments is more profitable than strictly making money from oil. This is why oil prices tend to go up in times of economic downturn in the US.

    4. Re:No. by mpe · · Score: 2

      A large support organization would have been necessary for the necessary piloting expertise

      Apparently little to no piloting expertise would have been needed to hit the WTC.

    5. Re:No. by einhverfr · · Score: 2

      It is not an issue of the very rich, IMO but rather of the middle class or upper middle class. Most terrorism against the US seems to come out of the Middle East, and I believe that there are real economic and historical reasons why this is the case. I feel that if we are to effectively combat that threat, then those root causes need to be addressed.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    6. Re:No. by Moofie · · Score: 2

      Finding examples of suicidal airline pilots is one thing. Finding examples of four, simultaneously suicidal, pilots on American carriers is, well, ridiculous. The planes must have been hijacked, the pilots removed, and the terrorists drove the planes into an Earth-shattering kaboom.

      Of course, they don't even KNOW what an Earth-shattering kaboom is...but I'll wager that the US Military is going to educate them very very soon.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:No. by jesser · · Score: 2

      Biological and chemical terrorism is something which is a bit of a boogey-man. We will probably never see a devestating attack using these means because they are simply too costly.

      But you admitted yourself that the group that crashed planes into buildings today was probably a large organization. Why wouldn't they want to use biological warfare? It may cost more than hijacking a plane, but it can also directly affect a much larger number of people.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    8. Re:No. by rew · · Score: 1

      Finding examples of four, simultaneously suicidal, pilots on American carriers is, well, ridiculous.

      Agreed. And you can't walk into the cockpit and put a gun to the pilot's head and say: "Please fly me into the WTC tower, as low as you can... ".

      The hijacker will have had to walk into the cockpit, kill two pilots, and sit at the 'wheel' himself. Possibly the "lockable door" to the cockpit provides enough privacy for a lone hijacker to do his deed. An occasional shot through the door would keep people from breaking it down.

      If the pilot of the PA plane had heard about the WTC, and found someone on HIS plane coming into the cockpit, my brother suggests that the best reaction is: shut off all motors, pull up the nose, untill the plane stalls. At that point in time there is likely not enough time to switch pilots, and recover the plane.

      Note that the pilot brave enough to do this is in fact committing suicide, albeit just say 5 minutes before an otherwise certain death.

      Roger.

    9. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be surprised if it were a stock market
      scam.

    10. Re:No. by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 2

      Sure - I was just saying that it's unreasonable to claim that a commercial pilot would never do something like that.

  160. To quote a Japanese Admiral...(I believe) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe we have awoken a sleeping giant....

    This will unite America like nothing else. People may say we are egocentric and that this like this happen. But this strike was against civilian and military targets. If you make the American people worry about where they live, we will demand of our government to remove that threat. It is not world opinion that motivates most Americans, it is her people.

    To sum this up, Americans are very pissed. Somebody has to pay.

    TS

  161. Fuck your online rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't find the article, but /. recently posted an article about the richardson, tx isp that was raided due to suspicion of ties to Hamas. There was a huge outcry. I would like to say that if the FBI reads your email and discovers that you like handjobs from your brother you might be embarassed, but I think that any concerns you have pale in comparasion to the death of thousands. The internet is not a private exchange, it is a public place. Act accordingly and stop your bitching.

  162. NSA by souleman · · Score: 1

    Why didn't the NSA know about this? What ever happend to Carnivore?
    .
    .
    .
    Or did they know?

  163. Close Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My step father was on the way to the towers for a meeting. He was 10 blocks away when he saw the first crash.

    He wrecked his rental car into a parked car while watching.

    What will the insurance company's do about this one?

    Are we all gonna feel the $$$ of this tragedy???

    When is the Big texan who runs this boat...gonna step up...and shoot the damn planes left....that are still in the air....THOSE NEED TO COME DOWN...before a close call...becomes a wakeup call.

  164. Stock market crashed today by mblase · · Score: 2

    *ba-ding bing*

    In a more Slashdotty vein, the CNN, MSNBC, and ABCNews web sites were all submitted to a relentless DDOS attack this morning, and it appears the people coordinating them are getting more and more creative....

    (Sorry. Humor helps me cope.)

    1. Re:Stock market crashed today by weslocke · · Score: 1

      Oh my god... this just snuck up before I realized what it was. This is a horrible situation, but thank you for giving an unexpected laugh.

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
  165. Regarding the Port Authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work there, their entire staff is in the 70's and 80's floors of one of the second tower that fell. the Porth Authority is utterly destroyed as a organization, I hope many made it out alive but it doesnt look good at all

  166. They Have Awakened a Sleeping Giant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The last country that awoke this sleeping giant
    paid a terrible price. I fear today's tragedy is
    only the begining. I think you could measure the life expectency of the Taliban as well as Bin Laden in hours. If you live in Kabul, I suggest you put your head between your legs and kiss your ass good bye!!!

  167. friends/relatives by Mattygfunk · · Score: 1

    Do we have a hotline to call for information on friend and relatives in the area?

    1. Re:friends/relatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Red Cross has a hotline setup at:
      212 299 0134 or 1800 932 8555

  168. Rumour by mwillems · · Score: 2

    London evacuating? I have heard that nowhere else.

    Michael

    --

    ---
    BDOS ERR ON A:>
    1. Re:Rumour by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

      I heard on BBC news that they evacuated the sotck exchange in London. They have not mentioned anything else...

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  169. Canada send it's deepest sympathies and support. by canning · · Score: 2
    Because we are so physically close to the United States it's so hard not to be effected by the events that are happening and has happened today. Our company has large office in New York, New Jersey and all across North America and we are praying that everyone is those offices are unharmed. We are getting very little information about our employee's whereabouts.

    The subway platforms are packed with people trying to leave the city. The mood is very sombre and some are in tears.

    Again, I think I can speak for every Canadian when I send our deepest sympathies .

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
  170. How could modern building collapse like that? by imipak · · Score: 2
    Anyone know about construction details of the WTC? How the hell could they collapse?? Clearly it was the fire that caused it... surely it would have been fire-rated to, like, NOT collapse in the event of a fire?? Anyone shed any light on this?

    BTW, big thanks to Slashdot: Taco, you did the right thing.

    1. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by nick255 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it was the fire which caused the collapse but the loss of structural integrity of being deliberatly hit by a big plane, probably full of fuel so causing a big explosion.

    2. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would guess that the buildings were not built to the spec that would allow them to absord the brunt of a full-flight jumbo jet smacking into them. Not to mention, the extra explosions that were reported were very likely bombs either pushed in through the planes, or put their earlier for explosion at the critical points in the building.

      I really don't see why it would be hard to understand a building collapsing when AIRPLANES ARE SMACKING INTO IT!

    3. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. For starters, a 767 type plane is a lot of plane to be hitting a building. Especially at a few hundred mph. I'm sure it took out a few load bearing members in the building. Plus, the fire. It was a raging inferno. Even metal doesn't hold up well to fires like that.

      Once the top half of the building gave way, the rest of the building jsut couldn't take it.

    4. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by Johnny+Starrock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most buildings arn't developed to withstand aircraft impacts. The WTC was a concrete re-enforced building. The initial impact would have stripped away a good deal of the concrete, and then the fire did the rest.

      As an aside, my brain has ceased functioning on any comprehensible emotional level. How do you cope?

      --

      end communication
    5. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by reimero · · Score: 1

      I'm not a demolitions or architecture expert, but as I understand it, the key to demolishing any building is to weaken it from within. A commercial airliner with any decent amount of fuel on board can provide a pretty huge explosion (aviation fuel is extremely flammable) and they hit several floors down. Given that the planes penetrated at high speed and that there were several floors above, it's understandable that the explosion took out the internal supports, destabilizing everything above the explosion as well as several floors below the explosion. After that, what remained of the supports simply couldn't sustain the weight of the remaining floors and the building collapsed. In some regards it's actually fortunate that it collapsed as slowly as it did so at least some people could get out.

      --

      ----------

      Something clever
    6. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy big plane.. huge hole supports that remained where damaged only a matter of time before it came down

    7. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and this was a Boston/LA flight LOADED with fuel...

    8. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by syates21 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe for a damn second that the plane crashes caused those building to collapse.

      If you watch the video of the second tower falling, it looks just about like when they do a planned demolition of a large building.

      I have to believe there was some other type of explosive "assisting" there.

      Note that you don't see near the level of damage at the Pentagon, where presumably it would be much harder to plant explosives and the like.

    9. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by JohnKFisher · · Score: 1

      I'm hearing some speculation that it may have been a secondary explosion UNDER the building that finished it off.... Speculation, yes, but makes this that much more coordinated.

      --

      John Kenneth Fisher
      Table of malContents
    10. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by gordon_schumway · · Score: 1

      A minor point:

      Aviation fuel is used in piston engine planes, i.e. propeller driven. It is lighter than gasoline and thus more flammable.

      Jet fuel is kerosene. It is heavier than gasoline and thus less flammable.

      --

      Ha! I kill me!

    11. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by mpe · · Score: 2

      Anyone know about construction details of the WTC? How the hell could they collapse?? Clearly it was the fire that caused it... surely it would have been fire-rated to, like, NOT collapse in the event of a fire??

      The initial impact and explosion caused damage right through the the building. Seriously weakining many floors.

    12. Re:How could modern building collapse like that? by mudshark · · Score: 1
      The WTC was unusual in super-skyscraper construction. Since the modern skyscraper era began in the 1880s, the standard approach has been to build a steel frame to support the static and live loads of the structure. The outer walls became merely the skin over the skeleton.


      In the WTC, the outer walls were structurally vital. They comprised a series of palisade-like columns tied together as an exoskeleton, and supported a significant portion of the buildings themselves.


      As the upper floors collapsed, the shock loads were transmitted down through the exoskeleton and the whole shebang came down. A "traditional" skyscraper might not have collapsed as utterly as the WTC towers did. But it's all armchair conjecture at this point. Few major buildings are designed to be rammed by commercial aircraft and remain standing.

      --
      In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
    13. Re: How could modern building collapse like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is mentioning another important effect: Heat destroys the integrity of concrete. As concrete is cooked at high temperature it turns brittle and begins to fracture. The stresses of the impact, the heat of the fire, the misalignment of the buildings weight, etc all played a part.

  171. Chickens come back to roost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a U.S. citzen and I left the U.S. a
    few weeks ago as I felt it was arrogant,
    bully, racist and facist. By leaving I had
    given up hope the U.S. would change as there would be justice for all the wrong that is
    done; the death, poverty, hate, suffering
    the U.S. has spread. Here I am now safe in
    Canada saying "This is what I was afraid of"

    Texas aint the biggest anymore

  172. Please shut up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The truly fucking remarkable thing about this is that a concerted terrorist effort involving multiple hijackings and bombs has killed tens of thousands of Americans in an act that will probably motivate acts of war. Perspective! Jesus Christ, the only perspective here is that MOST people don't know that freaking Slashdot exists.

  173. Update. by juuri · · Score: 2

    * SF is now on a stage 2 alert.

    * Pacific stock exchange closed.

    * Hiway 4 closed to tanker accident.

    * No traffic near Oakland airport.

    * CalTrans ordered all employees off bridges.

    * Extra police security on all bridges and security on public transit.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  174. Universities Closing by xZAQx · · Score: 1

    My college (Youngstown State) as well as the University of Akron (where my girlfriend goes) have been closed as a result of this event.
    Update:

    My girlfriend now reports that the University of Akron is being evacuated, as the Polymer Science building is a large supplier of the nation's polymer needs. All hell seems to breaking loose; very surreal

    --

    We dance to all the wrong songs.
    --Refused.
    1. Re:Universities Closing by Electrawn · · Score: 1

      Western Illinois University is closed as well. You can probably assume every University will be closed today.

  175. As far as the phone lines go....... by Delpino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The company I work for does satellite phones, and we are currently activating lots of them for the emergency response groups in New York and DC. Still, do please try to keep off the ground lines.

    --
    Waiting for a time when I can finally say, this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way -Phish
  176. MOD ME DOWN!!! - THIS IS A FALSE REPORT by benspionage · · Score: 1


    The Pentagon has NOT been hit again. The report was denied in the time frame I posted it.

  177. Re:How many people? by d3ltaspy · · Score: 1

    There were probably more people than that...

    The whole thing was too syncronized...

    There were around 50,000 people in the World Trade Center at the time... That's prety close to how many people died in Vietnam...

    Only 2-3000 people died in Pearl Harbor... How many died today ??? Way more...

  178. Did the Lloigor get out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was hard to tell from the pictures.

  179. MSNBC going down is why slashdot posts this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is typical of a bunch of geeks: The only reason why this story and the one before it were posted is because they couldn't get to MSNBC and other news sites. I think someone needs to get a life.

  180. check The London Times .. Palestinians celebrating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.thetimes.co.uk is still up... they have a story, the Palestinians are throwing candy in the air and celebrating the attack.

  181. BBC by President+Gas · · Score: 1

    It seems that the "BBC World Live!" for Quicktime is working well.

    --
    I would really like you to be on my side but the side you show me isn't what I had in mind -Judybats
  182. UK Information Line by AltoClef · · Score: 1

    For any UK readers worried about family in lower Manhattan or en route to the US, the Foreign Office have issued this helpline number:

    020 7008 0000

    No guarantee as to its accuracy. Someone I know who tried it just now said it wasn't working.

  183. How many dead? by loosenut · · Score: 1

    Many many many dead.

    Don't turn this into a sensationist media extravaganza. By implying that the nation is in chaos, you are giving the terroists exactly what they want. The psychological element of terrorist attacks are potentially a lot more powerful than the actual physical attack.

    Yes, this a tradgedy, but we don't exactly have rivers of blood flowing through the streets of every city.

  184. Don't Forget Usenet by Seanasy · · Score: 1

    Updates to clari.usa.top are coming fairly frequently. There's a timeline of events.

    1. Re:Don't Forget Usenet by Seanasy · · Score: 1

      Slashdot seems to be screwing up the URLs for news. Here's plain text URLs.

      news:clari.usa.top
      news:Aattacks-timelineURAux_BSB%40clari.net
  185. My Real Fear by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    My real fear is that the US government will wildly overreact to this. You think security was annoying to go through at airports before? And if you look at all Arabic, prepare for a body-cavity search before they let you on a plane - okay, not really, but there are a lot of folks with misguided anger.

    Let us try to keep in mind that most people of Arabic descent and most people living in Middle-Eastern countries are not terrorists. The Slashdot community doesn't seem too bad on this one, but I have talked with several friends and co-workers who appear a bit more reactionary.

    BinLauden on the other hand, I say send in the SEALs!

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  186. Short memories - remember Oklahoma by PeterMiller · · Score: 1

    All the same ideas were put forward a few years ago when the Federal building was bombed.

    "It's Saddam!" "It's Palestine!" "It's Bin Lauden" ......."It was one of us????"

    So until someone offical stands up and says; "Hi, it was me and here is proof." and the US gov says "Yup, they did it, we are going to bomb them into yesterday." I'm not blaming anyone.

    However, it's probably Lybia...they have been to quiet.

  187. Continuous Video Feed by marcop · · Score: 2

    I have been watching a continuous video feed for the past hour from http://www.sky.com/skynews/home/

    BTW, they www.sky.com runs Solaris. So does washingtonpost.com - which was one of the few sites that was up. I don't promote Solaris - but it is interesting.

  188. military base in california! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've got unconfirmed reports of a plane down at Camp Pendleton in San Diego county....

  189. Re:Microsoft to Rebuild the Towers by SGDarkKnight · · Score: 1

    how the hell can you guys troll me for this, If you heard the press release by MS you would be thankful for what bill gates said. he told the news basicly this; "if people think that they can attack the strongest county in the world and get away with it, they're wrong. Microsoft will rebuild the World Trade Centers" - in no way did i even slightly imply that this was fuckin funny, so to hell with any of you that think that my first post was even slightly sarcastic, because it was nowhere near that.

    --

    ...A no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool...
  190. GO TO WORK!!! by jafac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a terrorist attack.

    Its main purpose was to strike fear into the hearts of Americans, and to cause our economy to collapse. If everyone is afraid, then the economy WILL collapse.

    The emergency workers are busy. The military is obviously busy. Go to work and conduct your business as well as possible. Unless you are working in one of the obviously dangerous areas.
    They only beat us if we let our fear win.

    I'm not a soldier. I'm not a fireman or paramedic. I'm not a police man. But I'm going to work today, and I'm testing software, and I'm making sure that my little cog in the big machine keeps turning.

    Now, we're going to see what kind of a leader dubbya is. I have very grave doubts about his ability to deal with this situation rationally - think martial law - think more raids in Iraq - think more raids in Afghanistan. Think Arab Americans being rounded up (I'm sorry, but you know this will happen). There isn't much we can do about those things other than keep a cool head, and do your job as best as you can.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:GO TO WORK!!! by redbird · · Score: 1

      Well, while people should go to work, DON'T go to work if where you work is a likely target. Most people should be fine (my university has closed down for the day, which I think is a dumb move since we can certainly keep on learning regardless of terrorist), though, and need to continue on, re this post.

      --
      -- Gordon Worley
  191. some publicity stunt by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    Warner Home Video have announced the release of three volumes of the classic BBC sci-fi series Dr Who, all due for release on 11th September 2001. - First is Doctor Who: The Robots Of Death

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  192. It's not a "fire" by mblase · · Score: 2

    "Fire" damage didn't do it. If you didn't see the video of the second impact, a Boeing 737 large enough to carry 60-70 people smashed right into the side of it, and an explosion came out the other side. That's going to cause a *lot* of internal structural damage. And once the top floors start to collapse, their weight and force punches right through the floors below.

    Building codes aren't designed with events like this in mind, I'm afraid.

    1. Re:It's not a "fire" by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Boeing 737 is large enough to carry *several hundred* people. These are the jets that fly the Transalantic. They're *big*

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  193. You're Behind W Now? Well That's just great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Dubya who had no Middle East Policy, who has supported the use of USA-made fighters, gunships and tanks against the Palestinian civilians, who gives Bin Laden fuel for his hatred, just like his father George Herbert did, over the edge when the WTC was first car-bombed.

    First we had a collapse of USA foreign policy. Now we have a collapse of the peace that lasted from WWII until today. This is what happens when our courts appoint drugged-out idiots to run our country. You are absolutely crazy to feel that what has happend in any sense validates Dubya. It is his support of military force against innocent Palestinians that drove Bin Laden to this, just as his father's support of military force against the Iraqui's fueled Bin Laden's hatred a decade ago.

    There is only one way to make this stop. We must seize control of our government back from the conspirators who now run it and to begin a policy of fair treatment of others, the world around, starting in Palestine and putting an end to the Israeli war against the Palestinian people in their own 'country'.

  194. Try websites of non-american newspapers/TV channel by lythari · · Score: 2

    The Sydney Morning Herald has info and pictures. And the site also hasn't been /.ed.

  195. Re:Hysteria - Pacifist bullshit by Abdul2112 · · Score: 1

    Precisely the kind of roll-over pacifist crap that got us in this position in the first place.

  196. Three weeks ago, we were warned... by Ric0chet · · Score: 1

    ...by Osama Bin Laden that there would be an "unprecedented attack on US interests".

    According to the Washington Post, the Palestinian Democratic Party is denying any role in the attack...

    --


    How you see the world is how the world sees you.
  197. best source for news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.timesofindia.com/articlelist.asp?parent _key=296589292&catkey=1811284689

    comprehensive updates, and its up!

  198. Toronto by Chetna · · Score: 1

    Downtown Toronto is being evacuated and shut down; the CN tower, the U.S. consulate, all slowly stopping. People are going home early from work, traffic has stopped. Pearson is allowing no flights to leave, and all flights for America are being routed here. Mostly, we're just shocked that this happened and people aren't able to work during such a tragedy.

  199. The Siege? by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

    Will these terrorist attacks continue and get worse, resulting in the government declaring martial law, whereupon the Army will take over N.Y.C. and other nearby cities? This is a very scary situation we're in. And just to think I had planned a trip to N.Y. last week (I live in Los Angeles), but cancelled at the last moment.

  200. Re:Just talked to someone who was on the 81st floo by almightyjustin · · Score: 1

    That's 40-50 thousand, not 40-500 thousand. Small difference.

    --

    Omnes arx vestrum sunt adiuncta nobis.

  201. History repeats itself? by NoInfo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The last time something this big happened, someone ended up getting nuked.

  202. google has cached some news on front page by dd · · Score: 1

    google has cached the cnn story on its front page.

  203. hotline for people with relatives in the US by Mattygfunk · · Score: 1

    if in AUSTRALIA you can call 1300 555 135 for information on friends and relatives.

  204. WHAT IS THE TARGET?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no issue at this point with ALL OUT war. Nuclear force is acceptable. But where is the target????????

    1. Re:WHAT IS THE TARGET?? by Snootch · · Score: 1

      I have no issue at this point with ALL OUT war.

      Well, in which case I'd assume that you've already volunteered for cannon-fodder duty then...

      Nuclear force is acceptable.

      Really? Again, would you enjoy being poisoned by the radiation (and don't think you wouldn't get any, most of the people with the resources to do this could get their hands on a nuke)?

      But where is the target????????

      Oh, why not just ask around? It seems that half of the /. population has already gathered convincing enough evidence to decide who it was, or at least I must assume that they have, and are proudly announcing it to the world. I'm not sure we'd have enough nukes for them all...

  205. Terrorists just going easy? by MattW · · Score: 3, Informative

    And you think what, that terrorists could have nuked this time, and were just going easy wiping out the WTC?

    First of all, there's no one to go to war with. You can expect, however, that if it turns out a nation is harboring terrorists against justice, action will be taken.

    Second of all, unless we are isolationists again, we're going to piss someone off somewhere. It is the unenviable consequence of world leadership. Not retaliating is not protection against further attacks. If we identify a perpetrator, there will be awful consequences.

    Certainly, we must be cautious. We should take things slowly. Any response should be well-considered and deliberate...but not pacifistic.

    Also, for those of you who live with an arabian population, or any other population likely to be targetted by irrational retaliation, don't let others take their anger out on other Americans, regardless of their ethnic origins. Arabian-Americans are Americans, too.

  206. Whoops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inapropriate Slashdot Quote of the Day:

    "Do you smell something burning or is it me?"

  207. Pilots and Guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the pilots of those planes were armed with guns, then this wouldn't have happened. The police and the government can't protect us. We have to protect ourselves. Think about it.

  208. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  209. Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


    Bin Laden warned of "unprecedented" attack

    London - Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden warned three weeks ago that he and his
    followers would carry out an unprecedented attack on US interests for its support of
    Israel, an Arab journalist with access to him said on Tuesday.

    Abdel-Bari Atwan, editor of the London-based al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper said
    Islamic fundamentalists led by bin Laden was "almost certainly" behind the attack of
    the World Trade Center in New York.

    "It is most likely the work of Islamic fundamentalists. Osama bin Laden warned three
    weeks ago that he would attack American interests in an unprecedented attack, a
    very big one," Atwan told said.

    "Personally we received information that he planned very, very big attacks against
    American interests. We received several warnings like this. We did not take it so
    seriously, preferring to see what would happen before reporting it."

    Atwan has interviewed bin Laden and maintains close contacts with his followers.

    Two planes crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center as office workers
    began work on Tuesday morning, causing the south tower to collapse, eyewitnesses
    said.

    In Washington, another plane crashed next to the Pentagon, a US official said.
    Eyewitnesses said the building was being evacuated. The White House and State
    Department were also evacuated.

    A Palestinian group claimed responsibility, Abu Dhabi television said. President
    George W Bush called it an "apparent terrorist attack," and pledged the US
    government would "hunt down" those responsible. - Reuters

    Published on the Web by IOL on 2001-09-11 16:47:02

  210. worldtradecenter.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking for information, I went to www.worldtradecenter.com.

    All that appears is a message saying "this domain available for memorial or other purpose".

    Looked up the domain at register.com.

    It was last updated YESTERDAY.

  211. My favorite part so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The first (public) words out of George W Bush's mouth: "I have consulted with the Vice-President."

    That was the statement I heard brodcast twice this morning, anyway--possibly it was edited.

    1. Re:My favorite part so far by PeterMiller · · Score: 1

      At least he didn't say; "I've already consulted my bible"

  212. Yahoo's up by hearingaid · · Score: 2
    from Reuters on Yahoo!:
    Tuesday September 11 11:12 AM ET

    Massive Attacks Destroy World Trade Center, Hit Pentagon

    Photos
    Reuters Photo
    Audio/Video World Trade Center Hit By Planes (Reuters)

    By Alan Elsner, National Correspondent

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Three hijacked planes crashed into major U.S. landmarks on Tuesday, destroying both of New York's mighty twin towers, hitting the Pentagon (news - web sites) in Washington and plunging the United States into unprecedented chaos and panic.

    Loss of life was expected to be catastrophic from the collapse of the giant towers of the World Trade Center where many thousands of people work. The two enormous edifices both fell in a huge cloud of smoke and fire two hours after the initial impacts.

    New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani (news - web sites) said there had been a ''tremendous number of lives lost'' in the attacks on his city.

    Another plane crashed near Pittsburgh. It was not clear if this was another attempted hijacking.

    Hospitals in New York were overwhelmed with patients as a massive cloud billowed into the blue skies over Manhattan where the city skyline had been dramatically and permanently altered.

    ``Hundreds of people are burned from head to toe,'' said Dr. Steven Stern at St. Vincent's Hospital in the Greenwich Village neighborhood of lower Manhattan.

    ``The whole of lower Manhattan is coated in half an inch of dust,'' Reuters reporter Daniel Sternoff said.

    BUSH CUTS SHORT VISIT

    President Bush (news - web sites) cut short a visit to Florida and rushed back to Washington to face the greatest crisis of his young presidency.

    He called the deliberate aerial assaults an ``apparent terrorist attack'', and ordered a full-scale investigation. Early speculation about the source of the attack centered on Saudi-born guerrilla leader Osama Bin-Laden.

    It was the most dramatic and deadly attack on the U.S. mainland in modern history. The attacks forced the evacuation of all government buildings in Washington, including the White House and other tall buildings around the country, cut cell phone communications on the East Coast and grounded all commercial planes in the United States.

    Early reports said all three planes used in the attacks were hijacked, one of them from Boston and one from Washington. It was not immediately known who flew the planes and what happened to them.

    The day of horror began around 9 a.m. in New York when the first plane plowed into the south tower of New York's World Trade Center, as thousands of workers were streaming into the building to begin their day.

    It opened a huge hole near the top of the building. Two hours later, the whole building in which thousands of people collapsed on itself in a huge cloud of smoke and fire.

    TV stations caught the second plane plowing into the second of the twin towers, exploding in a fire ball a few minutes after the first impact. That building caved in about an hour after the first.

    Shortly afterward, a third plane crashed into or near the Pentagon in Washington, throwing people off their feet inside the building and setting off a massive fire.

    --

    my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  213. Not helpful language by imipak · · Score: 2, Insightful
    CNN showing footage of arabs celebrating.

    This is what frightens me about the US response. On past performance, there's a tendency to keep the great American moron^w public happy by randomly attacking Muslims, or Arabs. The people celebrating are Palestinians, who been on the end of activity that, were it performed by any other nation, would be condemned as warcrimes. Israel routinely kills non-combatant civilians in retaliation for attacks. This is not the way to stop people who already hate your guts, stop hating you! There is NO MILITARY SOLUTION to this.

    Those of you (Americans) who try to be thoughtful about this, /PLEASE/ try to avoid knee-jerk "It's the ay-rabs!" jingoism. I realise that revenge must be the first thought in many people's minds. Try to remember, the people who did this WERE ON THE PLANES and they're ALREADY DEAD. Modulo Bin Laden or whoever.

    Now, offing him would get my support...

    1. Re:Not helpful language by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Their culture is NOT like ours.

      They've been immersed in war for a couple generations. Their civilians are killed in terrorist attacks all the time. They believe that kamikaze revenge is a ticket to heaven.

      Don't attack them for their cultural differences. Just because you see some of them celebrating for the camera, doesn't mean they're bad people. Not the man-in-the-street civilian, at any rate.

      The people who planned and executed the attack, on the other hand...

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    2. Re:Not helpful language by dogzilla · · Score: 1

      I don't give a f*ck what their culture or past is, frankly. Bottom line - people here died, and they CELEBRATED IN THE STREETS. Americans do not run into the streets to celebrate the death of 30,000 Palestinians, Iraquis, Afghanis, Saudis, Egyptians, Syrians, or anyone else.

      Anyone who does that is, almost by definition, less than human. A human (in the Herbert sense) is pretty much obligated to remove such an obvious danger to other humans.

      I realize it's currently in vogue to put Americans down as fat, backwater idiots, but the truth is we're nothing of the sort. We are proud, resourceful, hard-working, and really really good at holding a grudge.

      As far as I'm concerned, our first words to Israel should be "Let loose the dogs of war." I think maybe a few Centurion tanks would be effective at putting an end to those celebrations.

      --
      The crimes of eBay are a disgrace to it's pig latin heritage!
    3. Re:Not helpful language by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      > Don't attack them for their cultural differences. Just because you see some of them celebrating for the camera, doesn't mean they're bad people.

      You celebrate the death of thousands of innocents, then you're bad. I don't care about your culture; it's wrong. Part of morality (as dictated by Betham, Kant, Rand, Jesus, Budda) is understanding that we're all human and that murder is wrong.

    4. Re:Not helpful language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. nobody stops members of the Israeli public from attacking Israeli Arabs and Palestinians at random. Nobody stops the IDF from killing innocent Palestinians. Nobody stops some gloating settlers when they openly rejoice in Arab deaths. Why should Israel be given an even freer hand than usual to screw even more Palestinians over than before?

  214. more pics and video here by -=Izzy=- · · Score: 1

    i have set up a mirror of more pics and video of the crash here

  215. Image archive by FuryG3 · · Score: 1

    I'm starting an image archive of the events (I'm blatently taking them from the news sites). Just an attempt to mirror some of the pictures to take the load off of the servers. http://warpenguin.com. Pls mirror.

  216. The FBI by vandemar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if this could have been averted if the FBI put their resources into preventing terrorism instead of things like Carnivore, and arresting Russian programmers. Granted Carnivore is supposed to prevent things like these, but terrorists that have the ability to coordinate an attack of this scale won't be using conventional email to communicate anyway. I hope they don't try to use this to outlaw encryption.

  217. I Hope Bush Doesn't Respond... by cburley · · Score: 1
    ...by bombing an aspirin factory and killing the innocent Sudanese inside. That sort of thing can give potential terrorists even more excuses to attack a nation that allows a President who takes such actions to remain in office.

    --
    Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  218. asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're so fucking full of shit. Going through metal detectors does not take away any of your rights, it's perfectly reasonable. So don't complain. They've saved countless lives already through prevention, so you should thank god everyday for those metal detectors. But instead you pretend this is the "evil government" or something, trying to take away your rights. This terrorist attack was so well coordinated, it would have been close to impossible to do anything about it, so don't you fucking dare blame others for it. Asshole.

  219. Not hysteria - rage by Redline · · Score: 1

    Be serious. This is an act of war. The WTC is gone! More people were killed today than in the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

    And the above post's sentiment of "let's play nice now or someone will get hurt" is ridiculous. It is a little too late for that. Many innocent Americans lost their lives today in a cowardly attack on this country. I hope that the perpetrators (whoever they are) find US vengeance to be swift, merciless, and complete.

  220. Re:Canada Status (not true?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am in Vancouver, BC.

    I hear all border crossings are open.
    I haven't seen MP's.

    (besides, they put soldiers on the street, not MP's)

  221. Washington Post Q&A by ll1234 · · Score: 1

    The Washington Post (one of the few news sites I'm able to access) is running several Q&A sessions with reporters/experts. One chat[1] is finished and a few more are scheduled for today.
    ;
    [1]: http://discuss.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/zforum/01 /freemedia_kaiser091101.htm

  222. Call to arms - this is war. by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    Actually, there were 3 planes hitting the towers.

    I've been to the World Trade Center dozens of times. I know (knew?) people who worked there. I can't believe they're gone. I'm watching CNN, ABC, NBC and CBS all at once on my antique TV set collection, and it's all so surreal.

    I'm a Canadian computer geek with military radar and electronics experience working for a huge American defense contractor. I've held IATA airport security clearance.

    I fear World War III is following. I'm willing to help. I'm willing.

    Allow me to take a moment to voice my solidarity with the people of the United States, the American government and even President Bush.

    This is war.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Call to arms - this is war. by Chris+Hind · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you're a moron. I hope you die soon.

      --
      nal 11
    2. Re:Call to arms - this is war. by tzanger · · Score: 2

      I fear World War III is following. I'm willing to help. I'm willing.

      You scare me.

      War is not good, no matter when, no matter who the enemy. Do not be so willing to pull the planet into war.

      I pray that if the US does declare war, that it be kept to the US and its enemy. I do not want a third world war. So far this is an internal US matter. Keep my country out of it.

    3. Re:Call to arms - this is war. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      War with who?

      You declare war on contries. I SERIOUSLY doubt a country would touch this with a 10km pole. The retaliation would be... unpleasant. All we've got is a theoretical group of terrorists. You can hunt them down, burn them out, bring them up on charges, and have them executed. But you cannot declare war on them. Individuals just don't rate "war".

      There are lots of Very Angry (and scared) people on our planet right now. Doing anything else is just going to be pouring gas on the fire.

      Now I wouldn't be to surprised if Dubya cancels the executive order forbidding assasinations over this, and has whoever is found responsible hunted down and killed. But that's not war.

      I won't be surprised if the CIA has it's budget doubled over this (the only way to stop something like this is to see it coming and head it off).

      I won't be surprised if there are quite a few stupid citizens of my country (USA) who decide to take their anger/fear/frustration out on the nearest follower of Islam... heck on anyone who LOOKS like they might worship Allah.

      I won't be surprised if this isn't the end of it.
      I pray that the storm has passed, but I'm waiting to see what else "they" have planned.

      The world gets a little shittier every day. What's gonna happen tomorrow?

      --Mark

    4. Re:Call to arms - this is war. by TomV · · Score: 1
      So far this is an internal US matter. Keep my country out of it.


      If only this were the case. NOT because of any animosity for the US, where I am still trying to find friends and family who might have been on Manhattan, but because, atrocity though it is, that would at least be a limited situation.


      This is the WORLD Trade Centre - the victims will include North and South Americans, Europeans, Africans, Asians, Australasians. Every country involved in International Trade will almost certainly have lost people.


      In the first instance, yes, this was an attack on the USA. But it's also a clearly intended attack on civilisation itself by those who would have the world ruled by the most ruthless and bloodthirsty, at whim.


      The Trade Towers attack said 'this is against the global culture'. The Pentagon attack said 'this is war'. Alaric's sack of Rome comes unpleasantly to mind.
      TomV

  223. The army had known about it? by boky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unconfirmed yet, but it seems that here in Europe (Slovenia) people have been hearing US army planes flying above their heads all day long (before the attacks).

    Call me paranoid, but I think the army knew.

    --
    boky
  224. you're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I visited that website a few hours ago and it said "Domain for sale, contact ...."

    it has just been changed very recently

    don't start shit son

  225. Killing fellow country-men by PanDuh · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it occurred to the retarded villains who committed this hideous act that they might have blown up a bunch of their own country-men. I know for a fact that there is a sizable population of Palestinian and Middle Eastern immigrants living and working in NYC. :(

    1. Re:Killing fellow country-men by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      The hijackers sacrificed their lives for their cause. I'm sure they had no moral qualms sacrificing the lives of their countrymen, as well.

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    2. Re:Killing fellow country-men by beardcz · · Score: 1

      It occurred to McVeigh...

      Let's not be hasty about pointing fingers, according to BBC and others the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine is NOT (repeat NOT) claiming responsibility (the first call was apparenly anonymous, anyone could call the media and claim that they did it).

      --
      No sig for me - too lazy to fill one in...
    3. Re:Killing fellow country-men by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

      I know for a fact that there is a sizable population of Palestinian and Middle Eastern immigrants living and working in NYC. :(

      First off, they probably consider any of their people living in the evil-empire-usa traitors to the cause.
      Second, these guys are suicide bombers (i'm guessing here, but someone had to fly those planes so I think its a safe guess) anyway. I'm sure they think they are shedding blood for some magical entity like 'god' or something and a few of their own people mixed into the carnage probably doesn't even bother them.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    4. Re:Killing fellow country-men by mpe · · Score: 2

      The hijackers sacrificed their lives for their cause

      Quite likely the planes were being flown by the hijackers, since it's likely that the air crews would have ditched the planes, in both New York and Washington.
      Little appears to have been made of the plane crashing in Pittsburg though...

    5. Re:Killing fellow country-men by ReTay · · Score: 1

      CNN Reports that a "senior intelligence official" was said to say there are significant indications that bin lauden's people were involved. Also that he has been training his people to fly passenger jets.

    6. Re:Killing fellow country-men by plumby · · Score: 1

      They had similar certainty after Oklahoma. I'm not saying that it wasn't Bin Laden, but it's very dangerous to jump to conclusions.

  226. Terrorist DDOS attacks as well, or what? by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2
    I'm still having problems getting news from most normal sites, and we are just barely holding up.

    Is this just sheer volume of normal interest, or is the implication here that there's some sort of DOS going on?

    I hope not. I really DON'T want any "Emergency Executive Orders" dropping draconian regulations on the 'net in the USA...

  227. Slashdot Quote of the Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was this intentional?

    QOTD: "Do you smell something burning or is it me?" -- Joan of Arc

  228. don't mod sh*t funny when this is happening by cybrthng · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    jeezus christ slashdot makes me FUCKEN SICK to my stomach when something is humerous in a VERY NON HUMOROUS EVENT

    1. Re:don't mod sh*t funny when this is happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chill out - humour is even more needed in times of crisis

  229. Video of collapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://mfile.akamai.com/920/rm/thepost.download.ak amai.com/920/msnbc/ms091101-4v.rm?obj=v0004

  230. Alternate live news source by emc3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those of you (like myself) who don't have a TV or radio in your cube, and who are bemoaning that there's not enough bandwidth for CNN to serve the entire country simultaneously, try CNET Radio. No pictures, but good radio coverage.



    Some good news -- the FAA has just reported that *all* commercial aircraft are now accounted for (there were about 50 in question), and have reported no problems, and are en route to nearby airports.


    --

    Ernest MacDougal Campbell III
    geek ramblings
  231. Try here by stx23 · · Score: 1

    robots.cnn.com And now I have to put something here because the postercompression filter sucks.

  232. Canada Status by xXunderdogXx · · Score: 1

    I am from Newfoundland Canada, and our airports are the destination for many re-routed flights. Goose-Bay Labrador is expected to DOUBLE its population because it is a small city with a very large airport.

    As for St. John's (where I am) we have gotten at least a dozen planes and we are expecting more. I'm considering going to the airport to volunteer for any help I can.

    -underdog

  233. Re:Racism - Bin-Laden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it comes naturally that you blame somone by default, when he has been thretening of duing just this for awhile.

  234. Not just racism by JokerBoy3 · · Score: 1

    The Palestinians have claimed responsibility for this attack. They are celebrating in the streets. Check out this news story:

    http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2001/09/11/arafat /i ndex.html

    They have stood up and declared themselves to be the enemy. Bad things will happen to them. The US troops are already on their way. If they thought the Israelis were treating them bad before, they haven't seen anything yet.

    1. Re:Not just racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read it again. It says that Arafat, their leader, is horrified.

      Just because some of the people have been brainwashed does not mean that they, nor their nation, is responsible.

    2. Re:Not just racism by JokerBoy3 · · Score: 1

      Its easy for Arafat to put on a "public face" while the people show the real feelings of the palestinians about their attack.

    3. Re:Not just racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palestinian Society doesn't work like that. Arafat speaks for his people.

  235. Weak airport security in the USA. by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
    I've been flying more often than usual for the past year, about every other month, and each time I've noticed that airport security has gotten more and more complacent -- at O'hare and Midway I routinely board with my spyderco and leatherman in my carry on, and I've only ever once been challenged in 20 some flights, and that was while catching a short prop flight from Virginia to Pittsburg...


    Just about year ago I boarded a flight from Detroit to Chicago with not just my usual sharp objects, but also a power screwdriver, set of Motorola trunking radios and their charger, and assorted spare batteries, all in my carry-on. Didn't get a second glance from security.


    Those days are over.

  236. Interesting about today's date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's interesting that today's date is Sept 11 or

    911

    Hmmm!

  237. Decent news source.. by duckie13 · · Score: 1

    I think this was posted in the last story, but I've found it to be an OK up-to-the-minute source..

    http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/newsfinder/default .asp?siteid=mktw

    Just watching that go by every minute, and seeing the events go on is just disgusting..I've been nauseous all morning just seeing everything happen little by little..yuck.

    --
    "My days are less enjoyable because of people." ~ Johnny the Homicidal Maniac
  238. Signifigance of today? by MWoody · · Score: 2

    I can't find any signifigance of today's date, as a possible explanation. The Oklahoma City bombing was the anniversary of Waco or somesuch; perhaps there is a similar connection here?

    "Today in history" sites:
    http://dir.yahoo.com/Arts/Humanities/History/Thi s_ Day_in_History/

    I can't find a good list of common Palestinian holidays, though...

    Here's the biggest list I could find (from http://www.scopesys.com/anyday/ )

    1609 Henry Hudson discovers Manhattan island
    1709 English, Dutch & Austrians defeat French in Battle of Malplaquet
    1773 Benjamin Franklin writes "There never was a good war or bad peace."
    1777 Battle of Brandywine, Pa; Americans lose to British
    1786 Annapolis Convention to determine interstate commerce
    1789 Alexander Hamilton appointed Secretary of the Treasury
    1814 Battle of Lake Champlain, NY; Americans defeat British
    1839 1st Canadian track & field meet held (Caer Howell Grounds)
    1850 "Swedish Nightingale" Jenny Lind gives 1st US concert
    1852 Olympia Columbian is 1st newspaper published north of Columbia R
    1853 1st electric telegraph in use, Merchant's Exchange to Pt Lobos
    1875 1st newspaper cartoon strip
    1881 Triple landslides bury Elm Switz
    1885 Moses Hopkins, named minister to Liberia
    1886 Mayflower (US) beats Galatea (England) in 7th America's Cup
    1889 Start of the Sherlock Holmes adventure "The Crooked Man" (BG)
    1893 Bronx Gas & Electric Company opens on Frisby & Tremont Ave
    1910 1st commercially successful electric bus line opens (Hollywood)
    1912 Phila A's Eddie Collins steals 6 bases in 1 game
    1918 Boston Red Sox beat Chicago Cubs, 4 games to 2 in 15th World Series
    1919 US marines invade Honduras
    1922 British mandate of Palestine begins
    1923 After a single, Red Sox Howard Ehmke retires the next 27 Yanks
    1923 The ZR-1 (biggest active dirigible) flies over NY's tallest skyscraper, the Woolworth Tower
    1926 Aloha Tower dedicated in Honolulu
    1926 US defeats France for their 7th straight Davis Cup championship
    1926 Yanks' Bob Meusel ties record with 3 sacrifice flies
    1927 Babe Ruth hits 50th of 60 homers
    1928 1st TV drama-WGY's The Queens Messenger
    1929 SF Mayor Rolph inaugurates new pedestrian traffic light system
    1930 Stomboli volcano (Sicily) throws 2-ton basaltic rocks 2 miles
    1935 US captures Davis Cup for 7th straight year
    1936 A's pitcher Horace Lisenbee gives up 26 hits in a game
    1936 FDR dedicates Boulder Dam, now known as Hoover Dam
    1941 Charles Lindbergh, charges "the British, the Jewish & the Roosevelt administration" are trying to get the US into WW II
    1941 FDR orders any Axis ship found in American waters be shot on sight
    1944 FDR & Churchill meet in Canada at the 2nd Quebec Conference
    1946 1st mobile long-distance car-to-car telephone conversation
    1950 1st typesetting machine to dispense with metal type exhibited
    1950 33 die in a train crash in Coshocton Ohio
    1950 Dick Tracy TV show sparks uproar concerning violence
    1951 Florence Chadwick becomes 1st woman to swim the English Channel from England to France. It takes 16 hours & 19 minutes
    1952 West German Chancellor Adenauer signs a reparation pact for Jews
    1954 1st Miss America TV broadcast
    1956 Cincinnati Red Frank Robinson ties rookie record with his 38th HR
    1959 Elroy Face's 22 game win streak ends as Dodgers beat Pirates 5-4
    1959 Oriole Jerry Walker pitches 16 inn beating White Sox 1-0
    1960 The 17th Olympic games close in Rome
    1961 Bob Dylan's 1st NY performance
    1962 Beatles cut "Love Me Do" & "PS I Love You"
    1964 George Harrison forms Mornyork Ltd music publishing company
    1964 Gillette's 20 year contract with MSG & ABC to televise fights for free ends as Dick Tiger defeats Don Fullmer at the Cleve Auditorium
    1965 Beatles' "Help!," album goes #1 & stays #1 for 9 weeks
    1966 Johnny Miller became the 1st Yank to hit a HR on his 1st at bat
    1967 US Surveyor 5 makes 1st chemical analysis of lunar material
    1972 BART begins service with a 26-mi (42-km) line from Oakland to Fremont
    1973 Chile's President, Salvador Allende, deposed in a military coup
    1974 Cards beat Mets, 4-3, in 25 (7h4m), record 202 plate appearances, Felix Milan & John Milner come to bat 12 times each
    1976 Evonne Goolagong loses her 4th straight US Open Final (Evert wins)
    1977 Guillermo Vilas beats Jimmy O'Connors wins US Open
    1977 TV's Rhoda gets divorced
    1982 Chris Evert 6th US open title defeats Hana Mandlikava
    1983 Franco Harris becomes 3rd NFL to rush 11,000 yards
    1985 Intl Cometary Explorer (ISEE 3) passes Giacobini-Zinner by 7900 km
    1985 Pete Rose of the Cin Reds gets career hit 4,192 off Eric Show of San Diego Padres, eclipsing Ty Cobb's record
    1986 Dow Jones Industrial Avg suffered biggest 1-day decline ever, plummeting 86.61 points to 1,792.89. 237.57 million shares traded
    1988 Sports Aid-jogging to feed the world
    1989 Drexel formally pleads guilty to security fraud
    1989 KSO-AM in Des Moines Iowa changes call letters to KGGO
    1991 "La Toya: Growing Up in the Jackson Family" goes on sale
    1991 14 die in a Continental Express commuter plane crash near Houston
    ---

    1. Re:Signifigance of today? by kindbud · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Today is the anniversary of the Camp David Accords.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:Signifigance of today? by JohnKFisher · · Score: 1

      I assume I will be corrected if i am wrong, but wasn;t today the anniversary of the Camp David accords???? That would help explain why Camp David was a target.

      --

      John Kenneth Fisher
      Table of malContents
  239. Amazing, CNN has BEST web design in war! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN's web design is normally like any typical
    bloated corporate site -- lame, full of crap you
    don't need, hard to view on some browsers... but
    now with USA attack the design is actually freaking AWESOME! You can view it great in mozilla, lynx, emacs w3, palm pilots, teletypes,
    freaking ANYthing!

  240. Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by tino_sup · · Score: 1

    Here are emergency contact numbers for the airlines with planes down.
    American Airlines - 800-245-0999
    United Airlines - 800-923-8555

    --
    I am me...I think
  241. The price by ajs · · Score: 2

    Most of us in the U.S. say, rather glibly, that we're willing to "pay the price" for our freedom. Well, tragic though it was, here it is. If we lived in a police state, this would not be possible. Then again, I don't think there would be much of a country left.

    Many have called for a "response". Our responses are, of course, already under way and I have faith that no matter how much I may push back against the expanding power of our TLAs and millitary, they are more than able to flush out the culprits for this attack, and remove their threat. If not, our tax dollars are ill-spent.

    However, if we sacrifice one shred of our heritage of freedom because of this, then no matter how much we "respond", we've already lost. In times of peace, it's easy to stand up for our freedom. Today, it takes something more, and I ask all of you to rise to the occasion.

    Defend the rights of those who will be attacked because they share skin color with those claiming responsibility. Don't give up fights for our freedom on the Net. Cherish your privacy and even your anonymity. If we can keep level heads through this, we will prove ourselves worthy of our nation and the sacrifice of those before us.

  242. 377th Military Support Command Activated by GMontag · · Score: 2

    News from WTOP FM, Manassas/Washington DC

    All members of 377th told to report for duty.

    VA National Guard Mobilized

    There are dead at the Pentagon. NONE OF THE CHILDREN IN THE PENTAGON DAYCARE WERE HARMED (thank G_d).

    Nothing new on 2nd suspected hijacked airplane in DC area (I heard the F-16's flying around out here, south of and very near Dulles Intl., I work very close to the NRO HQ). Been up here on the 4th floor of my building looking ;-)

    Thretcon B is now in effect in the Military Distrect of Washington/National Capital Region.

    Verizon is asking all people to stay off of ANY phone (wireless or landline) in the DC area.

  243. In Berlin by MichazB · · Score: 1

    Berlin has closed all roads in the vicinity of the government quarters. The U.S. embassy is heavily guarded. Chancellor Schröder has called up the national security council. Also watch http://www.indymedia.org when it is back on-line.

  244. first tower collapse video by mosch · · Score: 2
    1. Re:first tower collapse video by Philippe · · Score: 1

      Mirrored at http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/biol/legendre/wtc/

      (Stupid lameness filter!)

  245. What are you smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the immortal words of Benjamin Franklin. They that can give up an essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin, 1759

  246. Excuse me? by Snootch · · Score: 1

    Let's keep the truly remarkable thing in mind about this: we heard about it on Slashdot first. Great job, guys.

    The truly remarkable thing is that someone can get news of such a huge disaster and comment that they heard it on /. first. A sense of perspective would be nice...

  247. CISCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet it was CISCO.... they tried to slashdot the entire net to prove that the net needs their new 10GB routers to handle a large amount of traffic

  248. the pentagon has not collapsed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but it is indeed burning.

    see the washingtonpost webcam
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/mmedia/webc am s/eyeondc.htm

  249. Canada by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

    Well I am incanada. I was watching the towers come down live. This is nuts, up here in the toronto area, the down town core has been cleared of peple. We up here are scared like those in the states. I am only 2 hr from NY so its not hard to see them hitting us here eather. Think about the CN tower. The world trade center is a icon line the CN tower is, so it is scary to think about this, but they may hit it. Just a messed thought going on around my programing firm

    my 2 cents plus 2 more

  250. Sure by underwhelm · · Score: 1

    But everyone knows all that already. At least what I said was news. Life goes on, and I'm already tired of hearing people talk on and on about how nobody knows anything new and meanwhile they're getting paid to speculate, conjecture and fill time.

    That Slashdot once again survived an unintentional DDos attack in a time of crisis, that the major news sites could not, is worthwhile information. People are coming to Slashdot to share information. What a feat.

    --

    I don't need large brains to have a good time.

    1. Re:Sure by cyberdonny · · Score: 1
      That Slashdot once again survived an unintentional DDos attack in a time of crisis, that the major news sites could not, is worthwhile information.

      Well, "survived", kinda. Yes, the main page could be read, but no comments, no old articles, no nothing. Whatever link you clicked on, you get sent back to the main page.

  251. Tell Me This Isn't Unsettling by ZeneTungsten · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb" "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning" -- Nostradamus 1654 I'm pretty sure this is word for word, feel free to double check.

    1. Re:Tell Me This Isn't Unsettling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is horribly chilling...any chance you could get a source on this?

      Posting anon, just because...

    2. Re:Tell Me This Isn't Unsettling by ZeneTungsten · · Score: 1

      Trying to...if anyone can help with a link, please do so.

    3. Re:Tell Me This Isn't Unsettling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Jerusalem the city of God?

  252. And then there was this: by denan · · Score: 1

    When you think you've seen it all:

    People Celebrating the attack

  253. cross country flight = big fuel load by jmarca · · Score: 1

    My wife made the observation that a cross country flight has a lot of fuel, makes a big impact. So hopefully that means that all local flights are safe(r).

    Good job to slashdot for being one of the better (if not the only) site up and running strong.

    jem

  254. Guys, it's okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just another form of expression -- really just free speech in a way. It's one "symbol" to whoever committed this tragedy that, to them, served some view of "justice". After all, we killed McVeigh. Who are you and I to say that 50,000 dead in the U.S. wasn't "just" -- until you have heard all the facts from the misguided fools who thought it would be. Remember: when death is an O.K. form of expression toward Justice, then you can only call political deaths unwarranted when you have seen the reasons for which they were committed and you, personally, agree that those reasons did not serve a just cause. As of now, you don't know those reasons. So don't diss the most somber tragedy in the peaceable history of our nation -- it's just another form of expression, and as of now, you don't know what it's trying to express or why.

    (I don't mean what I think I mean.)

  255. let's pray and think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people should pray for the dead and do anything they can for the living (donate blood is a good example).

    and people should try to use their mind and understand that by wiping out some 3rd world country (which is very likely to happen - regardless of who is or may be responsible) is
    not the brightest thing to do.

    i may also sound cynical but americans should think of other bombards (iraq, yugoslavia etc). the terrorist attacks in usa has some similarities with the (not so) surgical military attacks, and all of them should be condemned.

    good luck everybody and stay alert for I am afraid that we'll see worst :(

  256. CIVIL LIBERTIES.... by isotope23 · · Score: 1

    They are GOD GIVEN rights, IE you are born with them and they CANNOT be taken away.....

    By your logic, the American revolution was unjust.

    The goal of society is Mutual respect for its citizens. I respect your right to life if you respect mine, etc.

    To try and suspend these rights does EXACTLY what the terrorists are after!

    Better we stop playing policeman to the world.....

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  257. Re:Canada send it's deepest sympathies and support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stuck here in Windsor working for a trucking company. Roads and bridges are shut down, Ontario's main two highways closed as well.

    I was supposed to be in a meeting at Ford world headquarters in Dearborn, MI today. That's been cancelled as well.

    It's amazing how far this act has really reached!

  258. eBay auction mirror by great+shamer · · Score: 1

    I can't seem to get the eBay page up.

    Find a .pdf copy of it here.

    http://www.eswerve.com/slashdot/ebay1.pdf

  259. Umm, NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Emergency crews need communications much more than anyone else right now.

    Ahh... out of the mouths of morons.

    You obviously don't know anything about telecommunications.

    Modern switching equipment will automatically drop 'regular' calls to allow 911 and other emergency calls through. It's not possible to get a busy signal on a 911 call due to telco switches being overloaded.

  260. The planes were full of fuel.... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

    Looking at where those flights were headed -- east coast to west coast, they were all fueled up when they hit their targets. Talk about a mess. Not only did they pick the targets for max psyc damage, but also for max physical damage. I wonder how many managed to get out of the buildings when liquid fire was raining from the upper floors...

  261. Reagan and Terrorists by arfy · · Score: 1

    And what did Reagan do after the car bomb took out, what was it, more than 300 marines?

    Didn't he just pull 'em out?

  262. Encryption by Porag_Spliffing · · Score: 1

    If only Encryption was banned this second perl harbour would never have happened......

    This will be used as an excuse to clamp down even harder on encryption and 'privacy' on the .net

    --
    Maybe you live in interesting times
  263. some palestinian camps are celebrating.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one thing i didn't see in your news report:

    in Israel,
    some palestinian camps (not sure exactly who, sorry) are celebrating this event and are throwing candies (and handing out flags?) in the streets.
    plus shooting in the sky, that is sure and confirmed, but that is usual behaviour in such conditions.
    the palestinian authority is trying to hide it so it won't get to cameras and have said they have nothing to do with it.

    sorry for the part truths, this is all something i semi-heard in the israeli radio (went home from the army when it happened), but i don't know of anything else that i can add.

    just reporting what i heard not trying to get hatred towards anyone.

  264. Very recent pictures of WTC by ssimpson · · Score: 2

    I was at the World Trade Center on Saturday the 8th of September, 2001....It was my first visit to the States from England and I was in awe at the city and WTC.



    Some pictures from the top of and from the outside of the WTC are here: http://www.samsimpson.com/pictures.php?dir=galleri es/newyork/wtc/



    Simply unbelievable :(



    --
    "Mary had a crypto key, she kept it in escrow, and everything that Mary said, the Feds were sure to know."
  265. structural engineering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I heard that the WTC had collapsed, I feared the worst and imagined it keeling over into neighboring buildings. When I finally saw the news footage of the event, I was amazed: it looked like a controlled demolition. The entire thing just cascaded downward as neatly as could be expected under the circumstances. Bravo to the structural engineers who kept this tragedy from being worse than it already is.

  266. Expect a backlash... by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the redundancy. I remember after the WTC and Oklahoma City bombings of reports of attacks against muslims and people of arabic descent, including harassment and mosques being vandalized.

    I won't be surprised to hear organized calls to violence against a group of people as a result of this horrific act -- an attitude no better than that of a terrorist -- though I might be slightly surprised if such calls come from any standing politicians.

    For an example of some rather nasty attitudes on a message board, check here [cnn.com].

    Bleah. I'm a bit nervous because I couldn't get in touch with my sister who lives in Manhattan. My parents reported that she's fine and in Brooklyn, but she's absolutely frantic because she can't contact any of her friends.

  267. Following the money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the organization of this attack, I would not be surprised if part of the reason for hitting the WTC was to cause predictable problems in the US stock market... problems that a terrorist organization could take advantage of to generate funds for their next attack.

    I wonder if anyone has thought to look for suspicious patterns of stock investment and options that may lead back to terrorist front organizations.

  268. Slightly offtopic, but needed to be said by Mtgman · · Score: 2

    I think there are benefits to an event like this(I wish it didn't involve disasters of course) but if you look at cnn and their current home page you will see that they did a MAJOR site re-design to get their page to serve easily over their available bandwidth(which is apparently much too small for their regular pages in a case of emergency). For those who still can't get it to load, it is one .jpg about two inches high and three inches wide and about ten or twelve bullet points.

    This is a change for the better in my opinion, the news sources have themselves to blame for their high-bandwidth sites which obviously can't cut the mustard when the heat is on.

    Steven

    --
    -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
    1. Re:Slightly offtopic, but needed to be said by cmilkosky · · Score: 1
      I have to agree with you. I am very impressed with CNN's decision to limit the content to the important events. Cut off all access to the high bandwidth pages, because what people need is information right now. By making the pages small in size, more people can access them and do it reasonably fast.


      Also worth noting - I'm betting that MSNBC is running Microsoft webservers. Looks like that site is pretty much out of commission. Goes to show that CNN either has a real team of thinkers (RE: switching the site to the important topic only), or just has done great planning. I now think of MSNBC as an entertaining news source only - not an emergency/primary news source. I also wouldn't trust a Microsoft product to run my webserver based on this situation (I'm not trying to start a flame war).... not that I did before.


      Chris

  269. NOT Terrorist DDOS attacks, just excess users. by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
    Sheer volume of normal interest.


    I'm responsible for some massive infrastructure in both Genuity and Exodus colocation, and both sites are seeing a huge traffic load on all 'news' web sites.


    Other non-news web connections seem to be faring fine, the only DDoS is more along the lines of the Slashdot Effect, specific servers are getting many more users than they planned for, and are individually being overloaded.

  270. thanks - great link! by stego · · Score: 1

    real karma for you....

  271. Biological warfare by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    Did they ever explain the small planes that buzzed the white house?

    Fact: Terrorists have been found to have bio weapon efforts. That's not saying that they have the actual weapons, but it means that they were trying to get them.

    Fact: This was an all out attack. If they had them, they used them.

    I packed a suitcase, and am getting several gallons of bottled water. Here in Florida, it'll come in handy in the event of a hurricane, anyway. I'm not bugging out, nor do I plan to... unless people start dying. I'm not alarmist, I don't expect to do anything... my gaming group is coming over tonight as usual. But I will prepare for the worst... if it sounds silly, think how yesterday this would have sounded: "Terrorists will knock down both towers of the World Trade Center, set the Pentagon on fire, and crash four passanger planes within two hours tomorrow morning".

    I knew spending weeks in the woods in Scouts / hunting / the SCA would come in handy. ;) (That's a semi-joke, but it does feel good to know that if I *really* have to, I can do a couple months outside of civilization).

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  272. Nope, Religionism by tswinzig · · Score: 1, Troll

    I personally won't be targetting Middle Easterns in my mind, but rather, whichever religion is at the base of these attacks.

    If your God says it's OK to kill people, your God is fucked up.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:Nope, Religionism by danjerdanjel · · Score: 1

      What about the Crusades? Actually, personally, I see some of the modern branches of christianity to be fairly shocking in terms of morality. However, that is a separate issue that I won't go into as I don't want to be flamed too badly today (thankyou very much).

      In fact, it's not really even Islam that's at fault. Islam, in it's proper form is rather peaceful, really. I don't actually have much experience with it (being more experienced in Asian religions and Judao-Christianity), however.

      However, it's the same issue as with racism. There are always people in every religion that are going to be problematic. Many religions foster a fanatical closed-mind attitude.

      No. I don't know.

      --
      - - -
      giftedu ;)
    2. Re:Nope, Religionism by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      that'll be christianity then won't it?

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    3. Re:Nope, Religionism by jacobito · · Score: 2
      "If your God says it's OK to kill people, your God is fucked up."

      Aaargh, PLEASE be sane. There is nothing peculiar to Islam that sanctions violence. If you insist on thinking along these lines, at least recognize that one of the biggest problems the world faces today is fundamentalism.

      That aside, we don't know who is responsible yet. Let's not point fingers. And when we do find out, let's be sane, let's be calm, let's be mature. No one more deserves to suffer as so many have today.

      -jacob

    4. Re:Nope, Religionism by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      If your God says it's OK to kill people, your God is fucked up.

      Hence the reason the Arabs hate the Israelites: The Israelites invaded Palestine after leaving Egypt (milleniae ago) and killed everybody in name of God. Then the Arabs kicked them out, after the Israelites were enslaved and sent to Ur, Babylon. (Where they learned how to write and made the Old Testament)

      So anyways, the Israelites made it back. Of course the Palestinians want them out. And whenever the Israelites are opposed, they immediately label any such person as anti-semitic and a holocaust-supporting evil nazi person.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    5. Re:Nope, Religionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, both religions have murderous histories, as do their Christian cousins.

  273. Perl Harbor by Fleet+Admiral+Ackbar · · Score: 2
    But unlike Perl Harbor, where the enemy was easily identifiable...


    Larry Wall, riding a camel?

    --
    Carefree highway, let me slip away on you.
  274. New plane crash information by LordCodeman · · Score: 0

    Supposedly the two planes that crashed into each World Trade Center buildings were both from Boston.

    The plane which crashed in Western Pennsylvania was bound from Newark, New Jersey.

    The United Nations is indeed evacuating according to CNN.com, which just seems to have a plain white page with a few lines of black text, and only one graphic.

  275. Umm, no. by schon · · Score: 1

    Precisely the kind of roll-over pacifist crap that got us in this position in the first place.

    Yeah, that's why all those European countries and Canada were all attacked first, right?

    The original poster is correct. Think before you act, and when you do act, do so with tact and diplomacy. Remember Oklahoma City - all the frothing at the mouth about foreign terrorists, and it turned out to be an American.

  276. Re:You're Behind W Now? Well That's just great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, that'll stop the jealousy of those rouge states that want to hurt the US so badly. That will open thier eyes to understanding other religeons as, at the least, acceptable. And that will end all of the US's problems.

    STFU, you're a fucking retard if you blame this on Bush.

    good luck,

  277. 1+1? by dghcasp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dig past the "headline" pages to the "normal" news and find interesting things...

    From the Globe and Mail, a story about how 5 days ago the U.S. banned novelist Salman Rushdie from all air travel in the U.S.::


    On Thursday, the U.S. Federal Aviation Authority in Washington issued an emergency directive banning Mr. Rushdie from all flights in and out of the United States, reflecting a heightened state of alert.


    Same alert? Did they know? Conspiricy theorists, come crawling out of the woodwork...

    Full Story on www.globeandmail.com

  278. Correction!372nd Military Police Command Activated by GMontag · · Score: 2

    372nd Military Police Command Activated (not 377th blablabla)

    Just after first attack, US Military Aircraft were launched in NY and DC with orders to shoot down any hostile looking aircraft.

  279. Friends of McVeigh by Fleet+Admiral+Ackbar · · Score: 2

    Do you mean the US Army, which trained McVeigh and 'lost' his records? Or perhaps you mean the ATF, which evacuated the OKC building... hmm... 24 hours before the bombing.

    --
    Carefree highway, let me slip away on you.
  280. Date Significance of September 11. by bareman · · Score: 1

    It is

    9/11

    or 911 which is the phone # for emergency (at least here in the states).

  281. Related, but cannot send general reply... by Xepherys2 · · Score: 1

    www.defenselink.mil, the official DOD website, is also unreachable.

  282. MERCY Re:Slashdot Quote of the Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will someone del this silly offensive cookie.

    fortune says accidents never happen.

  283. attn moderators by imipak · · Score: 1

    please mod up parent

  284. Re:i beleve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Low tech attacks are hard to nuke. It takes few resources to kill or (beat into unconciousness) an airline pilot. Terrorism isn't vulnerable to military force. True, terrorists can be killed, but the "Men in the Walls" are harder to wipe out than cockroaches.

  285. Read the linked page FIRST!! by NullGrey · · Score: 1

    Before you make a comment about how 'eerie' this is, read the page. You'll see that this is NOT a quote from Nostradomus, but rater an attempt by the author of the webpage to show how if you make enough vague statements, evetually, sometime in the future, it will be "fulfilled". Seems like this has backfired on him this time.

    Here is the quoted text:
    "At this point I would like to introduce to you what I call the "Infinite Monkey's Principle." Let's say that I have aquired an infinite amount of monkeys and an infinite amount of typewritters or word processors (It doesn't matter). Of course, as far as we know that is impossible to do (Unless you buy factory direct from me--send 500 trillion dollars to me (gold bullion only, liquid assets are not negotiable) But I digress... If these Infinite Amount of Monkeys are allowed to bang out whatever they want on the infinite typewriter, one of them will produce the complete works of Shakespear.

    How? Simple if the Monkey's write random garbage but in an infinite amount, eventually because of the simple fact that it is inevitable (simple probability thought shows this).

    How does this apply to Nostradamus? Well I will show you...

    If I make say a thousand prophecies that are fairly abstract for example:

    In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb

    Well let us analyse this. For Example what does City of God mean? It could be Mecca, Medina, Rome, Jeruselum, Salt Lake City, or any holy city depending on your religion. What do I mean by thunder--a storm? War? EarthQuake? lots of stuff can be described by thunder. There are a lot of two brothers on this world (I think the Number runs among the Billions) and fortress edure's what--Besiegement, Famine, etc? What Great Leader? How will he succumb? To what?

    Now let the prophecy rest for a few years. Add a couple thousand more. Eventually, one of them will fit close enought with events that have happened in the future that the prophecy will appear to come true. If you make enough prophecies and are intelligent enough to word them in such a way that they are abstract you become instant future see-er person. For example those psychics you see every year that make predictions for the year 199-whatever generally get one or two out of ten predictions right. It is because they are good guessers and that there is enough of them to make it seem like people can really predict the future.

    I am not discounting the possibility of a sixth sense nor of the supernatural but I would like to state that there is no scientifically proven Psychic person in the world. Ever psychic that says that she or he is a psychic and has been put to the test has failed quite miserably. It is true. There is no discounting that fact.

    Further more, the Scholar's of Nostradomas seem to be taking further and further leaps in logic when they interpret his writings. For example this is a link to a page in which a person claims that Nostredomus prophesised the breakup of Canada. Click here to judge for yourself.

    Further more I was watching a 1970's movie on Nostredamus and it predicted that the Third World War began in 1994 and was well on it's way by 1999. (I am holding my breath. Oh no!). The people who "analyse" the Quatrains simply scan through history until they find an event that seems to fit with the quatrain.

    Perhaps Nostredamus was a futurist. I do not know. Perhaps he suffered some sort of mental illness (hardly unusual in 16th century Europe). Maybe he just had nothing better to do with his time. I do not think though that, faced with the evidence that science has shown, he was a true Psychic who could see the future. Call me a skeptic but I believe the "Phrase Innocent Until Proven otherwise" should be used to regulate any phenomena in Nature. (In this case it would be Scientifically Explainable unless shown otherwise. Or in the Case of Psychics you are not a Psychic unless you can prove beyond reasonable doubt that you have these "powers")

    That is all."

    --
    +-- (Score:-1, Moderator on Power Trip)
  286. Palestinians.... by frost22 · · Score: 1

    Don't blame all Arabs ... (Brit who's related to Arabs - Palestinians, in fact)

    Palestinians right now are celebrating the attack on the streets, in fact. Maybe you can shed light on that.
    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
    1. Re:Palestinians.... by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 2

      I can of course try to shed light on it.

      You see, America _isn't_ loved by everyone.

      The unity provided by
      /the enemy of my enemy is my friend/
      may be a desparate one, but that's because these situations involve desperate people.

      Egyptians are celebrating in the streets too, and Egypt is probably one of the most USA-friendly nations in the Middle East.

      The Americans cheered every blast in the Gulf war. Palestinians who are cheering are no different from those Americans who cheered back then. You cheer when you see your enemy hit.

      And believe it or not, America _is_ viewed as an enemy by many (most, perhaps) in Palestine. That might be something to do with $2B donations of fighter aircraft to Israel, or it might be something to do with something else from the last 53 years.

      Should I stick up a .jpg of a photo my sister took of a tear gas cannister which had "a present from the US" printed on it in English and Hebrew? If you can't see that America continually supporting an oppressive occupying regime makes them an enemy, then you are missing something.

      Every country which has suffered directly or indirectly due to actions from the USA in the past will have _some_ people celebrating, I assure you.
      As I said above, and it looks like it needs repeating, it's nothing more complicated than
      /The enemy of my enemy is my friend/ .

      THL

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
    2. Re:Palestinians.... by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 1

      There was an arms fair ('DSEI') in the UK yesterday. As one might guess, there were also protests outside this fair. There were, I have heard first hand, cheers yesterday as the reports came in:
      "they too were not gloating at the deaths of thousands of individuals , they were cheering a
      strike against the enemy."

      That's in the UK.

      THL

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
  287. The Date by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    Only significant thing about today that I could find that relates:

    9/11/1922 British mandate of Palestine begins

  288. Not an excuse, but rationality beats panic any day by smash_retro · · Score: 1


    Two things to think about.

    I've traveled around the world a bit, and realized that while most people (even in Iraq, Iran, and other parts of the Middle East) hold no particular ill will towards America/Americans, there are still hundreds of thousands millions who rightly view the USA as a state that condones and participates in terrorist activities.

    It's no secret that the US govt. has sent guerillas and trained rebels to meddle in other countries affairs, set up idiotic puppet goverments to protect corporate interests and stifle democracy, bombed civilian targets, (accidentally I hope! but you can never really be sure...) and whatever else that I don't know about and can't think of because it never gets reported.

    Now that doesn't mean that the US govt. is made up of the worst bad guys out there, but it does mean that people have REASONS to hate the US and aren't merely "crazy".

    The second thing to think about is that outside the USA, Australia, Western Europe, the "1st world" et al. People do not have the same moral value system as we do. In countries where people scrape to make a living, human lives are considered somewhat less valuable, and there isn't much thought given to the pain and suffering individuals go through when tragedy strikes. (unless it's your own family, of course)

    There's a non-Western mentality that has to be understood if we want to get to the bottom of who's behind these inconceiveable, unbelievable, horrifying attacks. No one but the most hardened criminals in our common society would ever even participate in something that would kill so many innocent people at once.

    The people who did this have likely known pain and suffering beyond what any reader of this forum would believe. It's the only way they could ever be so heartless as to launch these attacks. To say that the suffering of others is trivial compared to their own.

    It's always a shock to realize that the majority of the world's population don't share your values or morals. It's a lot easier for your average (middle-aged) Chinese, Indian, or African person to accept (but not condone) this kind of event as "just something that happens" because they're used to high mortality rates.

    Enough rambling for now. On one hand I hope they get whoever did this and make them suffer, on the other hand I hope they don't because they'll probably get the wrong guy and hang him as a scapegoat.

  289. PLEASE MOD PARENT DOWN by JohnKFisher · · Score: 1

    can someone mod the parent back DOWN, please, so it's less likely to be noticed? Real smart to ANNOUNCE this, you fucking idiot.

    --

    John Kenneth Fisher
    Table of malContents
  290. Re:Canada send it's deepest sympathies and support by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

    Yes, we are in pain for humanity that this could happen at all. We are looking at the possible beginnings of war that touches us again. We do not want or need that.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  291. Gun Rights by t0qer · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the rest of /. Right now i'm damn glad I live in a country where I can own and firearm and form militia's.

    I know alot of other people feel the same way I do, I just bought 6 bricks of .22 ammo about 15 minutes ago, wasn't quite mayhem at big5, but there was about 8 people at the gun counter, when usually there is no-one there.

    The silicon valley is going to be attacked. No doubt in my mind. I doubt any full scale invasion is going to happen, but from a tactical standpoint, we have several key targets.

    Moffet Field, has lots of tracking hardware.
    MAE West is a major Internet communication Hub.
    Santa Clara county in general has tons of co-location servers, all juicy targets to whoever is doing this.

    I just watch willie brown tell the bay area folks not to panic. Doesn't he know we're living in one of the major communication hubs of the world? Guess not.

    Sorry to take so much bandwidth writing this, my mind is numb right now, so i'm just sorta letting this flow out. My wife has family in NY, so i'm really scared right now. I'm scared for them, my wife, my and her families and friends.

    I'm sorry for the families of the victims. I pray the worst is over.

    Maybe I should look at my 6 month post dot com layoff stint as a plus. I've learned to eat less, I got rid of my addiction free candy and soda courtesy of the dot-coms. I've been working in my backyard, getting healthier.

    I'm sorry slash, go ahead and troll or flame my comment, my mind is numb and i'm too shocked to write anything usefull.

    --toq

  292. video of plane crashing into tower. please mirror by mosch · · Score: 2
  293. Television 1. Internet 0. by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Re:CNN Slowly Coming Back

    it's a good measure of both how dependent we have become upon the internet and how woefully inadequate it still is as a large-scale information outlet for important events [things other than pictures of Movie Star Julia Roberts eating her favorite B&J ice cream].

    From The Register:
    17.40 GMT: It would appear the immediate threat from more terrorist threats is over, although the States has gone into a state of panic. Hundreds of buildings across the US, viewed as possible targets, have been evacuated. All airports have been shut down. Borders shut. The flood of calls into New York has jammed switchboards. Companies are setting staff home early.

    One person put the World Trade Center up for sale on eBay but the sick joke was removed almost immediately. News Web sites have started popping back up as the initial demand lifts and the blame seems to have fallen on notorious terrorist Usama Bin Laden.

    The number of dead and injured remain impossible to predict except that they will probably be in the thousands. Press conferences are due to take place in the next few hours.

    16.37PM GMT Thousands of people are feared dead following suicide plane-crash attacks on the World Trade Center, in New York today.

    Twenty-five thousand people were thought to be working in the twin towers of World Trade Center in New York at the time of the kamikaze assaults. Both of the 110-storey towers collapsed within two hours of the onslaught.

    A third plane has crashed into the Pentagon, Washington, part of which has collapsed, and a fourth plane has crashed south east of Pittsburgh. A fifth plane is reported to be heading towards Washington DC, according to Sky News.

    American Airlines has confirmed that it has lost two planes with a total of 156 people on board, one from Boston and one from Washington DC.

    Up to eight airplanes are said to have been hijacked,
    US air authorities say that three planes are unaccounted for.

    Yasser Arafat has condemned the attacks, but current speculation still puts the blame on Palestianian separatists. All Israeli embassies in the US have been evacuated as has the UK stock exchange. Part of the Pentagon has also collapsed. All civilian planes in the US are grounded.

    Net News
    The incredible spate of terrorist attacks has knocked most the world's news sites off the Internet as people tried to find out the latest news.

    CNN has been offline ever since the news that a second plane had crashed into the World trade Center. The BBC has fared little better, which the site now inaccessible. MSNBC was available for a short while but seems to have disappeared as well following the posting of a video of the second plane crashing.

    [16.50PM GMT: Most news sites have now put up a simple front page with a list of stories in order to bring themselves back online]

    The news that a bomb has gone off just outside the Pentagon and a third explosion near the World Trade Center have only added to the problems. All UK newspaper sites are struggling with demand, working at an incredibly slow rate. Only The Guardian and the FT are offering accessible information as we write.

    The World Trade Centre Association Web site has also vanished, and access to any New York Webcams is impossible. Tony Blair has cancelled his speech at the TUC to fly back to London.

    The only news sites that seem to have weathered the demand so far are the Press Association's Ananova site and Sky TV's Sky.com, although that too is having trouble now. Ananova reckons eight planes in total have been hijacked. All planes in US airspace have been ordered to land as soon as possible.

    It seems that the Internet has failed in its first truly hard test as a news disseminator. The best coverage is coming from the usual TV outlets.

    More as things go on.
    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  294. thoughts from Europe by kievit · · Score: 1

    I hope Bush learns from this that the worst threat on the US is not coming from 'nuclear missiles from rogue states', that anybody wanting to do evil has way more basic methods available. Cancel that silly project, the money can be used to recuperate the cities after this horror day.

    People are calling for revenge. I don't know, which target would you try to hit in revenge? "Terrorism will never win" I read, but if you decide to retaliate with lots of high tech violence, killing again lots of innocent citizens (in Palestine, Afghanistan or whereever you think you should drop your bombs), I think that exactly then terrorism *has* won. Terrorists want war, you should not give them that pleasure. But I have to admit that I do not know an alternative strong answer to the crimes that were committed today.

    These are just my thoughts. I am European, sitting moderately safe (still) in Amsterdam. Maybe if I were American I would have thought something else.

    I am horrified by what I saw, heard and read today. I hardly dare to think about the consequences, whether the world politics are stable enough deal with this catastrophe wisely. I even feel a little silly when I write this, I am only 31 years old, I have only a very naive idea about what 'wisely' means in this case.

    I wish all of you all the best. These are crazy times.

    1. Re: thoughts from Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to paraphrase Dennis Miller:
      "It's been said that killing terrorists brings us down to their level and they win. Really? At least there won't be as many of them at the trophy ceremony."

  295. Re: Airport security by spiro_killglance · · Score: 1
    >One problem illustrated by these attaacks is that airport security is too lax


    Absolutely


    Also, Aircraft security, the pilots cabin should
    be sealed with a code lock, the pilot should have
    guns, and there should be two armed security offices on all planes.
    Aircraft transponders should not be switch-off-able. Ground control
    should have the option to take manual control
    of planes, with a secret pilots override. There
    are hundreds of things that should be improved
    in aircraft security

  296. Tom Clancey's Rising Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever read Tom Clancey's novel, Rising Sun? The similarities are stunning - in that book the President (character Jack Ryan) had the terrorist leader's house bombed (with him in it) with a live video feed to the world as part of the retaliation.

    Did you know that President Bush repealed a law last year that outlawed the hunting and execution of terrorist leaders? I will be watching to see what happens.

    Condolences to all those whom lost loved ones in this horrible tragedy.

  297. structural details from reasonably informed source by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    My brother does construction mgmt for a big real estate company that builds and manages large office towers worldwide. I spoke to him this morning and he explained the situation, as best he can assess it secondhand:

    High-rise buildings are built to control the spread of fires for long enough to allow people to evacuate safely. There is no capability, however, for fighting a truly large fire on a high floor. In modern steel-frame buildings -- and I don't know if the WTC was built recently enough for this to apply -- the steel is coated with a fireproofing material, and the combination of the fireproofing and the sprinkler system is supposed to provide structural integrity for a period of three to five hours. That's supposed to be long enough to evacuate the building safely. After that even the fireproofing is insufficient to keep the steel from heating to a point where it effectively begins to melt, deforming to a point where the building can no longer hold up under its own weight.

    In this case, we weren't even looking at a normal fire. The incident began with a massive, high-speed, intentional impact that sheared off multiple beams, exacerbated by a large explosion from fuel aboard the plane. The initial damage was severe. Furthermore, my brother speculates that the impact likely severed the water pipes that reach the upper floors, leaving water gushing from a single point or a relatively small number of points and rendering the sprinklers largely useless.

    Buildings do survive aircraft impacts, incidentally: A plane flew into the Empire State Building in the Sixties, I think, and obviously it's still standing. Anyway, I don't think it's fair to characterize this as a fire causing a building collapse -- it's more like a very large bomb.

    --

    "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
  298. great post from cypherpunks by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking about the worthlessness of requiring photo ID at airports just a few days ago...and I stumbled on this article...it's timeliness is tremendous.

    http://cryptome.unicast.org/cryptome022401/faa-s ec crit.htm

    To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
    From: daw@cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)
    Newsgroups: isaac.lists.cypherpunks
    Subject: CDR: Re: FAA's new air passenger surveillance system
    Date: 20 Apr 1999 20:14:24 -0700

    In article ,
    Declan McCullagh wrote:
    > Tourist or Terrorist?
    > by Declan McCullagh (declan@wired.com)
    >
    > 3:00 a.m. 20.Apr.99.PDT
    > WASHINGTON -- A US$2.8-billion monitoring system
    > championed by Vice President Gore will
    > use computer profiles to single out airline
    > passengers for investigation and scrutiny.

    Thanks for forwarding this.

    I've actually done a fair amount of research into the FAA's photo ID
    security requirements, and what I've learned has really depressed me.

    What most people don't know is that the FAA regulations which require
    airlines to ask for photo ID don't apply if you aren't checking luggage.
    (Caveats: Only applies to domestic flights. And a few airlines have
    stricter regulations than what's required by law. I last checked about
    6 months ago; if the policy has changed since then, all bets are off.)

    However, there's an education problem -- many airline employees don't
    know this, and in practice you will have a hard time convincing them.
    Sadly, I think the FAA is complicit in this problem -- when I called them,
    they (reluctantly) confirmed over the phone that this is indeed their
    policy once I volunteered that I knew about it, but flat out refused to
    confirm it in written form (!), saying that this information only goes
    to those with a need-to-know.

    But leaving that aside, what's far worse (to my mind) is that most of
    these invasive "security" procedures are of dubious effectiveness. In
    all honesty, I think they would be unlikely to slow down a motivated
    adversary much.

    For kicks, I've done some investigation and testing, and here is some
    analysis on their effectiveness [1]:

    1. Hand-searching carry-on luggage for selectees:
    easily bypassed.

    (Anecdote: Whem I fly as a selectee, the usual procedure is that they
    search my luggage at the gate in advance, then let me roam before
    boarding. This does not require much thought to bypass: show up early,
    stash your bag in a public locker before the search, then retrieve it
    afterwards.)

    (Anecdote: Once, rather than searching my bags immediately, the
    checkin agent put a sticker on ticket that was supposed to alert
    the gate agent not to let me on the plane without searching my bag.
    I was truly impressed: I thought for once their hand-search procedure
    was going to be effective. When I got to the gate, the gate agent
    stared at the sticker for about 30 seconds, clearly not sure what it
    meant, then finally looked at me and waved me through, without the
    search. Maybe it was just a fluke, but I'm skeptical.)

    2. Photo ID requirements:
    laughable.
    (I assume I don't need to mention that if teenagers find it easy to
    obtain fake IDs, presumably would-be terrorists can also get one.)

    3. Profiling:
    I am very skeptical.
    (Suppose I have an ID under a false name. I use it to get a credit
    card under that name, then buy a suit and a round-trip ticket in

    first class. How is the profiling going to pick me out of the
    crowd of business travelers??)

    4. Random bag searches as you pass through the metal detectors:
    probably not very reliable, though surely they help a little.
    (Anecdote: When the security guard at the X-ray detector asked if he
    could search my bag (a random suspicion-less search), I played dumb
    and asked "Do I have to?". He said, warmly, "Oh, are you late for
    your flight?". When I nodded yes, he let me go without searching.
    Friendly guy!)
    (Anecdote: One FAA document had to advise security guards to not pick
    just small bags for the "random" searches. Turns out that some
    guards were avoiding the big bags because they took more effort to
    search.)

    5. The metal detectors & X-ray machines entering the gate:
    actually a pretty good defense, but they can be defeated without too
    much effort.
    (Simple attack: carry a big bulky "laptop" that actually contains
    a pound of nasty explosives. This is pretty hard for the good
    guys to stop with current procedures, sadly...)
    (Anecdote: Ever wonder how they get the beer and other supplies into
    the bars and restaurant near the gate? Lucky Green tells an
    eye-opening story about the time he saw them wheeling these kegs of
    beer around the metal detectors as the guards waved them on. When
    you realize that these are opaque containers that block X-rays, it
    is clear that pretty much anything could potentially be transported
    past the security perimeter in a keg, no questions asked, if you can
    position yourself as the beer-supplier.)

    6. Positive bag matching.
    PBM is seems like it must be a pretty good defense, if you assume the
    terrorist doesn't want to die from his own bomb, and if you apply it to
    every passenger, although even then, it still can be defeated.
    (The attack that seems hard to prevent: The terrorist finds a flight
    with a stopover, boards with a bomb in his carry-on luggage, then gets
    off the plane at the intermediate destination (leaving his carry-ons
    up in the overhead compartment) and never re-boards.)
    (Another weakness: In practice, it's only applied to fliers that "hit"
    in the profile, so adversaries actually have two ways to defeat PBM:
    avoid the profile, or play the stopover trick mentioned above.)

    Notice how the most privacy-invasive security techniques (ID checks,
    profiling, hand-searches, etc.) are also the ones that are the least likely
    to be effective in practice?

    It seems the ineffective techniques (photo ID checks, etc.) are there
    just to reassure the flying public that the FAA "is doing something",
    i.e. perception management (normally called "pulling the wool over your
    eyes") rather than real security. Sadly, it's exactly their privacy-invasive
    nature which makes these techniques work well for perception management,
    so I don't think we'll be rid of this problem soon.

    Another big problem the good guys have is transitive trust. If you pass
    security in Podunk Airport and fly to JF Kennedy, you can then wander around
    the "secure" area and get on another flight from JFK to SFO, without ever
    going through security in JFK -- and if Podunk Air is lax about security,
    you can use them to bypass the strict security in JFK. In other words, the
    security of the US airport system is only as strong as its weakest link.

    I don't envy the position of those responsible for aviation security; if
    the goal truly is to prevent terrorist attacks (not just to project a false
    sense of security, as the cynics would suggest), they have a very hard
    problem on their hands.

    However, I fear that the FAA has struck a terrible balance in their current
    aviation security policy: it is not strict enough to offer real defense, but
    just harsh enough to invade our privacy -- we give up some of our freedom
    when flying, and in return, all we get is "security procedures" that don't
    actually do much to protect us. All this is surely old hat for the grizzled
    cypherpunk, but depressing nonetheless.

    Footnote 1.

    Normally I would be a little reluctant to post this kind of detailed
    information on weaknesses in the aviation security infrastructure --
    while I value my privacy and freedom to travel, the last thing I want to
    happen is for someone to go bomb a plane after reading this post (no
    matter how unlikely that may be in practice).
    Nonetheless, if we as a society are going to make an informed policy
    decision, we can't kid ourselves. We live in a democracy, and the public
    needs to know the flat honest truth.
    It's one thing to sacrifice some privacy if you gain a lot of security
    in return. It's another thing entirely to needlessly sacrifice freedom
    if we gain absolutely no security in return. And I think the evidence
    shows that we have gained nothing in return for the extra restrictions
    on our freedom to travel. The real terrorists surely know this; the flying
    public deserves to know, too.

  299. America is not an innocent nation by paai · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all.

    The WTC may be for western people the symbol of
    wealth and prosperity; for many more people
    it is the symbol of poverty, pollution, child
    labour and colonialism.

    I can mourn the victioms, but I cannot forget
    the facts.

    Paai

    1. Re:America is not an innocent nation by deus_X_machina · · Score: 1

      Oh really? And what nation IS innocent? It's been said that a soldier has the advantage of being able to look his enemy in the eye... but not today. This was an act of pure cowerdace.

      --
      "In a Democracy, people get the kind of government they deserve." -Winston Churchill
    2. Re:America is not an innocent nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying that the country that you live in (the Netherlands) IS an innocent nation?

      Your page says that you are "Married with beautiful wife and father of two beautiful, red-haired daugthers."

      What if they worked at the world trade center in NYC?

      Or better yet, what if they worked at a large building in Amsterdam and some asshole pointed out that the Netherlands is not an innocent nation?

      What is the relevance? People who never hurt anyone died today. And amazing assholes like you imply that we get what we deserve. Fuck you.

  300. Condolances. Regrets. No surprise. by Jeremy+Lee · · Score: 1

    I have been watching my television for slightly over three hours, starting only a few minutes from the first collision. I watched everything. I have tried to imagine the terror and fear of the victims, but cannot.

    Rhetoric and ideology should never overshadow the tragedies of the individual victims, but more than lives have been lost today. The United States seems also to have lost it's ability to reason. Already I hear spokesmen and anchorwomen chanting the words: "Hunt them down". The lust for revenge is staggering. It will grow worse.

    Nothing can be said to assuage the terrible need for vengance. The American people will act, driven by the very same emotions as the terrorists. The cycle will continue.

    The United States is not the target of terrorism because it is a democracy, or because of it's beliefs, or because the terrorists are jealous. If that were so, there are closer and easier targets.

    The US is the target of terrorism because of how it involves itself in the affairs of other countries. Therefore, the first response to this tragedy should be a change in how the US conducts it's foreign policy.

    The US has set itself up as the world's policeman and banker, not it's doctor or engineer. It has deliberately engendered fear, not love. It has a history of projecting it's ideology on other countries through the use of force. It is those factors which have lead to the horror I have seen today.

    If the United States cannot put aside it's pride and apologise to the very people who have just attacked it, if it cannot make amends by loving those who hate it... things will just get worse.

    --
    Jeremy Lee | Orinoco
  301. Re:structural details from reasonably informed sou by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Buildings do survive aircraft impacts, incidentally: A plane flew into the Empire State Building in the Sixties,

    It was the 40's right after WWII. The plane was a B-25 a much smaller plane flying a lot slower.
    Plus the Empire State building has a much larger safty factor in it's design.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  302. Internet is handling this event well. by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
    I'm actually pleasantly suprised by how well the 'internet infrastructure' is working.


    I have big buildouts at Exodus and Genuity, and both sites are seeing problems, but they are isolated to specific high-traffic news sites.


    This is a major news event, and as such, there is a huge overload on major news sites, including sites operated by newspapers, TV, and radio.


    I have trouble loading MSNBC, a bit of difficulty with slashdot, but normal network access to my servers on Exodus, Genuity, Sprint, and other places around the country has not degraded at all.

  303. Re:structural details from reasonably informed sou by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Ah, thanks for the correction. It makes more sense that it happened in the 40s prior to the widespread deployment of radar, etc.

    --

    "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
  304. Chicago by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
    There were some reports of a car bomb on State Street in downtown Chicago, but these were false.


    There have been no incidents in Chicago, just the usual shutdown of government buildings and landmarks.


    Also major shopping malls are closing today.

  305. FUCK ALLAH by joolios · · Score: 1

    She sure needs a rim job.

    1. Re:FUCK ALLAH by buzban · · Score: 1
      now there's a post you can be proud of.

      troglodyte.

  306. Perhaps it's right there... by TopShelf · · Score: 2

    1922 British mandate of Palestine begins

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  307. National Missile Defense in new perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's happened today should atleast put the National Missile Defense programme in a new perpective. Hopefully U.S. politicians will now realize that the greatest threat agains the United States is NOT ballistic nukes, but terrorists using hijacket airplanes or, worse, briefcase nukes, to cause major damage to the countrys infrastructure.

    1. Re:National Missile Defense in new perspective by jake-in-a-box · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that what happened today constitutes, or is even representative, of the "greatest threat?" The fact that this happened is evidence that more must be done to prevent it in the future, but in no way serves as an indicator of the total extent of the threat, what the worst-case scenario might be, and what the sprectrum of threats is.

      It may be far easier to institute tighter security around the staffing and boarding of aircraft than it is to prevent offshore staging of a few nuclear-tipped missiles.

      --
      To hear the gods laugh tell them your plans.
    2. Re:National Missile Defense in new perspective by mpe · · Score: 2

      Hopefully U.S. politicians will now realize that the greatest threat agains the United States is NOT ballistic nukes,

      Even without a missile defence system launching a ballistic missile is effectivly handing a target to the US military.

      but terrorists using hijacket airplanes or, worse, briefcase nukes, to cause major damage to the countrys infrastructure.

      Also rember that bombs (including nukes) can be carried in cars and trucks....

  308. Hijacking is different by Nonesuch · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It doesn't take high technology to hijack an airplane... I wouldn't be suprised if these hijackings were carried out with quite primitive weapons, perhaps as simple as a knife or icepick.


    I do agree that US airport security has become very complacent recently. I've flown many, many times in the past year, often to the east coast, commonly flying with a pocket knife and leatherman multi-tool in my carry-on baggage, only once ever was it even noticed... before boarding a flight to Pittsburg.


    Civil rights must be protected, but there is no right to board an aircraft. If you don't like the tight airport security, take a bus, a train, or drive yourself.

  309. News from Globix in NYC by wbeckler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been getting emails from a friend at Globix, the giant internet exchange in southern Manhattan. Here is the latest news:

    Globix is located on Centre Street south of Canal Street. Businesses south of Canal have been asked to evacuate. The dust from the WTC collapse has forced buildings to shut down their air conditioning. Only a few large computer operations can operate without normal air conditioning, but major exchanges, like the AT&T telephone building and Globix, have backup cooling systems that should hopefully operate in these conditions.

    Globix engineers are taking care of major service problems and trying to prevent potential major problems so they can leave as soon as possible.

    Globix is hooked into the 3 largest backbones that pass through the region, and at least one must still be operating. Email messages originating from Globix are making their way out, but messages sent to Globix are not coming in.

    A telephone call to (212-334-xxxx) from NJ (856-672-xxxx) got through, but no calls to the 718 area code are working. I just received a call from a 212 phone as well.

    My friend at Globix was walking to a class at Sun Microsystems at the World Trade Center when the first plane hit. His view of the collision was obscured, and he was not injured. He commented:

    > I ran down to the woolworth building and stood
    > looking in shock at the North tower, the smoke
    > billowing out of it and the thousands of papers
    > fluttering down against the blue sky. Suddenly
    > I saw something hurtling down the side of the
    > building. It was a man, limbs, tie and suitcoat
    > flailing. several more followed. I turned and
    > slowly walked back towars the sunny, newly
    > renovated park in front of city hall.
    >
    > I heard the second explosion hit, and people
    > began screaming and running past me.
    >
    > As I sit here at my comfortable nest of a
    > workspace, my skin crawls, and I feel sick to
    > my stomach. I have read about events this bad
    > or worse a hundred times in the novels my
    > father derisively terms storybooks, but the
    > reality is completely incomparable. Perhaps he
    > had a point.
    >

    Another friend of mine was in the 70th floor of the second building to get hit, and he made it out alive. I don't yet have the details on that.

    Transportation update (from a Brooklyn friend):
    Subway lines are running off and on, and bridges and tunnels are closed to cars. The W line was still bringing people into Manhattan at 9:30, but that has ceased. The N/R is now running above 14th Street. Pedestrian traffic is allowed on the Brooklyn Bridge and the Manhattan Bridge. People in suits have been streaming over these bridges into Brooklyn all morning.

    Historical Note:
    Today, September 11, is the 28th anniversary of the CIA-led coup that overthrew the democratically elected government headed by Allende in Chile. Why is this relevant? I feel an immense amount of anger towards the people who caused this, and I think the people who caused this are the murderers sitting in Washington D.C. who direct U.S. foreign policy. They recklessly inspire anti-U.S. sentiment in every other country in this world. We ruthlessly bombed civilian targets in Yugoslavia (including water purification sites); we starve the children of Iraq; we blockade Cuba for no good reason; we topple democratically elected socialist governments in order to install pro-U.S. dictatorships. My anger does not direct itself solely towards the government officials who have perpetrated these crimes. I am furious at the millions of Americans who voted for George W. Bush. They are responsible for putting into power a person who is walking all over international agreements about global warming and arms control. And anybody who sits by and pays taxes and watches our imperialistic military and State Department do its dirty work has to take some responsibility for these murders. WAKE UP AMERICA: THIS IS YOUR FAULT. No missile defense shield will protect us from the hate that is justifiably spawned worldwide by our pro-corporate foreign policy.

    Experience of an anarchist:
    When the mail carrier knocked on my door this morning, I was worried that I was about to be taken in by the FBI. If you know what I've been through, you would not think this was a paranoid reaction. There will be a witchhunt following these events, and the U.S. government will probably use it as an excuse to harass activists. Right now the joint anti-terrorism task forces around the country spend most of their money tracking and harassing the anti-corporate activists who have been targeting world financial summits. A good chunk is also spent on the Earth Liberation Front and the Animal Liberation Front, neither of which actually have any members; they are just slogans that autonomous cells apply to their acts of vandalism. Today's events show yet again that money spent on national security does not in fact serve national security, but rather serves the insidious ends of the people controlling this country. Expect there to be calls for more money to fund politically motivated witchhunts against the Left. Expect calls for outlawing consumer use of encryption.

    Finally:
    Eben Moglen, Columbia University Law Professor and general counsel of the FSF once said about the inevitable rise of encrypted communications:

    I don't doubt that there will be downsides. You should accept the truth that harms will be caused, as harms are caused by free speech all the time. But don't let yourself be panicked about this. The world of the twenty-first century will be more free, and will continue to be, as the spooks often say, "a tough neighborhood." Indeed, some bombs will go off; there will be, in Stewart Baker's signature phrase, "some mangled, burnt bodies." You will notice that there are already. But fewer of them will be in Iraqi prisons; none of them will ever again be in a gulag or Lager maintained by a KGB or SS state with a tap on every telephone. And of that you should be very proud, because it is we who will have made it possible.

    1. Re:News from Globix in NYC by townmouse · · Score: 1

      Today, September 11, is the 28th anniversary of the CIA-led coup that overthrew the democratically elected government headed by Allende in Chile. Why is this relevant?

      Probably not relevant to this atatck. At the moment Chileans are pursuing justice through legal means, by suing Kissinger over his alleged assassination of a general who supported Allende.
      --
      Ask me if I've been required to disclose any crypto keys.
  310. Journalistic responsibility and public good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calm down folks. This story is hurried and still very undetermined in fine details. There are obviously some hard facts (towers, pentagon), but we need to worry less about other rumors and respond to the needs at the moment. If prayer or good wishes is all you can do, then do that. If you can give blood, then stop reading this and go do so, the victims can't wait till tomorrow. And even if you're only a small cross-section, if you're just calling a buddy in NY or DC but who you know is safe, get off the phone and let the emergency services and panicked loved ones get through. You can do something by conserving telecommunications assets right now, there's enough chaos without blitzing phones and melting local routers. Go give blood.

  311. Montreal by TCaptain · · Score: 1

    I hear that they are asking offices and businesses to close in downtown Montreal.

    --
    "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
  312. Birthday by Nygard · · Score: 1

    Mine too. I may change it to October 11th.

    --
    "Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped." --Elbert Hubbard (1856-1915)
  313. An odd question by caffeinated_bunsen · · Score: 1

    In the middle of the Pentagon courtyard, there is (or at least was) a hot dog stand called "Ground Zero." Does anybody know if that stand is intact, or is it buried in rubble, or something in between? I haven't been able to find any pictures of the Pentagon to indicate the state of the courtyard, so I can't tell.

    Of course, my concern and condolances go out to all affected by this, but I can't help but wonder what happened at Ground Zero.

    --

    Bugrit! Millenium hand and shrimp!
  314. Actually, autopilot might work by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
    The planes must have been flown by the terrorists into the buildings.

    I was talking to my friend (a CFI, certified flight instructor) and he said that the commercial planes have autopilots that can be programmed for nearly any course desired. Getting 3 or more suicidal pilots is a lot harder than 3 or more suicidal people carrying instructions for how to program an autopilot.

    Also, air traffic control should have been aware when the planes started heading for class B airspace, and scrambled interceptors. They've done it before. Of course, this wouldn't be the first time that plans weren't followed in a crisis.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  315. Douglas Adams says by underwhelm · · Score: 1

    The one thing a person cannot afford to have is a sense of perspective.

    --

    I don't need large brains to have a good time.

  316. re-retaliation? This was their trump card. by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


    I strongly agree with you when you say this is not a time for hysterical responses such as war, etc. Considering that the previous bombing of the World Trade Center (which was admittedly less severe than today's attack) did not escalate things to a state of war, perhaps we (the US) will take a strong, rational approach to eliminating the group responsible for this. Then again, the US is in a dramatically different economic and political situation than we were in 1993.

    As is evidenced by the Bush administration's "screw-em-if-they-don't-agree-with-us" approach to the ABM treaty and Kyoto Protocol, our leadership is probably the least-experienced we've had ever to deal with such an event. As citizens, we'll all need to resist the temptation to fuel the war hawks with spirited demands for revenge.

    I don't expect we have any worry about these terrorists launching a nuclear attack. If they had that capability, today we would have seen it. This isn't a tit-for-tat exchange. Those folks were putting all they had into this assault. They know that with this attack, they've escalated matters to such a level that their organization will be destroyed. They have prompted a global response that would advocate any amount of military action necessary to seek out and punish those responsible. If it takes the US army driving tanks over every square inch of Afganistan (Not that we have evidence that Osama Bin Laden is responsible for this), it would be hard to find any government other than possibly the Taliban who would resist the US doing so. And the Taliban is not exactly poised to impose economic sanctions on the world powers to protest.
  317. omfg by Danse · · Score: 2

    Citizens of countries who condone this type of action are not innocents, they are as guilty as the rest for not rising up.


    You're the worst sort of idiot in this world. Stupid AND violent. Look at what you said and then imagine it being said by someone in the Middle East about America. WE are responsible for the actions of our government. WE are the targets of those whom we have harmed, whether we believe it justified or not. They share your belief that all the people of the country are responsible for the acts of their government and therefore all Americans are legitimate targets.


    Some would like to see our country razed, just as you would like to see their countries razed. It's your kind of thinking that is responsible for such tragedies as today's events. America has perpetrated some pretty serious crimes in this world. People have good reason to hate us in some cases. We're not as innocent as we like to think or as our government would tell us we are. In any case though, massive military retaliation would be idiotic. It will only lead to more destruction on both sides.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    1. Re:omfg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It IS said in the Middle East about the US DAILY but the mantra has worn so that we ignore it.

      Otherwise, sure. Lets roll over and show the world we're weenies. That will sure stop the next guy from flying into a building full of people trying to earn an honest living.

    2. Re:omfg by Danse · · Score: 2

      No. Let's quit trying impose our will on the rest of the damn world. Maybe then they won't have any reason to blow the hell out of us. I don't disagree that the people responsible should be brought to justice. Just that it should be done carefully and without any "collateral damage." We've committed and/or supported many horrible acts as a country. We are responsible for the actions of our government. Yet we somehow think we still hold some sort of moral high ground. If you want to blow the hell out of other countries, fine. But don't fucking make up lame ass reasons for why you're doing it and don't even pretend to be innocent.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  318. Woah tiger by underwhelm · · Score: 2

    CNN, ABCnews, etc were all incapacitated. Even if I were foolish enough to use *them* as my primary news source, I don't visit their sites first. Today, I would have been wasting my time to even try to visit their sites.

    All you get on CNN, Fox and even NPR now is redundant coverage, talking heads and speculation--which is why I don't use them for "news" on a day-to-day basis. Or am I supposed to assume that I need to check the "valid" news sources for terrorist attacks when I wake up every morning?

    I won't respond to your ad hominem attacks, but I stand by my original post: Slashdot has done a great service to its readers by posting this breaking news and remaining accessible through the deluge of information and traffic, as well as for providing their usual discussion services which far exceed the glib "info-poll" applets you see on the established news sources. As far as I'm concerned they've provided the best coverage of this event, from a functional standpoint, available on the web. Its operators should be proud. Call it offtopic, but it's true and we should acknowledge it.

    --

    I don't need large brains to have a good time.

  319. They weren't airtight anymore. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
    How the hell could they collapse??

    Air pressure. A good chunk of the weight of the building is supported by internal air pressure. The buildings have to be nearly airtight anyway because of the difference between the atmospheric pressure between the ground and the top anyway, so they use air pressure to help support the weight.

    Obviously there's a safety factor built in, so a couple of bronken windows wouldn't drop the towers to the ground. But with holes that big, and structural damage from the crashes themselves, they were going to collapse sooner or later.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  320. Time to look at history. by Kibo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Traditionally, Americans have been by far the most vicious and ruthless when it comes to defending their own. I know MY history. It might be worthwhile to note that prominent leaders such as Kissinger, to say nothing of those who's futures hang in the balance, favor painting with a borad brush. It's not just the assholes who hijacked the planes, it's not the assholes who told them to, it's not the assholes who trained them, it's not the assholes who provided the financing, it's not just the assholes who provided shelter, it's not just the assholes who turned a blind eye, it's all of them. When it comes to killing, no one knows how to do it better than Americans, this they will learn.

    When we find the whos, and we will, anything this big leaves a trail, then the time of retribution will be at hand. Believe me, it would be an ignorant if not suicidal move to stand between US and revenge. Right or wrong as it may be, "If you're not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." Notice how quick the Taliban responded, they know what they allowed to happened. They have a dim idea of what the consequences may be. I can only assume that the comparisons to Pearl Harbor, and the eventual fate of Japan translate into their native tongue. It would behoove those who consider themselves enemies of the West to reflect on what happened to the last nation to attack American soil. I, for one, will lose no sleep over any lives lost should we decide to show those who traffic in terror, what it is to fear. They can hijack planes, we can wipe their cities from the face of the earth.

    But hey, we're a representative oligarchy, and in this instance, I'm more than happy to let the rich representatives, who've lost a lot, make a strong point by spilling blood in my name.

    I remember when I was about 10 being on the observation deck of one of the WTC, and looking down at all the people. I remember how impossibly huge those buildings seem. Now, those are gone. Maybe a little kid not so different from me was experiencing that still familiar sense of awe. It seems unlikely that anyone in such a situation would have been able to escape (thankfully many others have, seemingly most). What was their sin? If they can be killed in the name of a "benevolent" diety, then my "corrupt" government has my blessing to proceed with any retribution that can be described as "indescribable."

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  321. Re: Airport security by mpe · · Score: 2

    Aircraft security, the pilots cabin should
    be sealed with a code lock,


    But a lock is only a good as the door it is attached to

    the pilot should have
    guns, and there should be two armed security offices on all planes.


    Bullets and planes are a very dangerous combination. There is a lot of energy involved in the presurisation on an aircraft cabin.

    Ground control
    should have the option to take manual control
    of planes, with a secret pilots override.


    Actually this could well make things more risky. If this kind of override is to be usable it simply can't be kept that secret...

  322. Tom Clancey's Executive Orders by Glove+d'OJ · · Score: 1

    I think that his other book is more to the point...

    From Amazon.com:

    "The American political situation takes a disturbing turn as the President, Congress, and Supreme Court are obliterated when a Japanese terrorist lands a 747 on the Capitol."

    I hope that this is not life imitating art...

  323. Need Blood by schlicker · · Score: 1

    Here in Lincoln Nebraska we are expected to get some of the burn victims. Our St. Elizibeth Hospital boasts as being one of the nation's top burn facilities. Also are city is sending some of our own medical emergency crew to NY to help out. Anyone in Lincoln who can give blood, I urge to do so. We are known here in Lincoln to keep a large surplus of blood on hand for emergencies and the time has come.

  324. Have you ever read `Stranger in a strange land'? by Molf · · Score: 1

    I think you need to, because you obviously don't understand the idea behind humour.

  325. No evacuation in Oslo by KjetilK · · Score: 2

    There was a report about the U.S. Embassy in Oslo on Norwegian TV now, and the embassy has not been evacuated. However, large armed police forces (Norwegian police are normally unarmed) are covering the building.

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  326. Or by zwerf · · Score: 1

    S11 (September 11).

    Nothing implied, just a thought.

    --
    This .sig down for maintenance.
  327. They chose transcontinental flights by pnadeau · · Score: 1

    Maximum fuel on board, for maximum damage?

    --

    --
    Can't buy what I want because it's free.

  328. World Trade Center Victims by alexburke · · Score: 2

    Our sympathies to the relatives of the victims of the World Trade Center collapse.

    Now do the right thing, Mr. Bush -- if Osama bin Laden was behind this, find him and his henchmen and blow them into the next dimension.

  329. Re:You're Behind W Now? Well That's just great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your response indicates that you are a crude, profane, ignorant, self-righteous cretin. Obviously you believe that there is no motive here other than the muslim religion. And you believe that when Dubya refuses to even talk to Arafat that he's not at all condoning what the Israeli government and its military forces are doing to the Palestinians. Clearly, you believe that using profanity and insults somehow validates you and your attitude. You don't happen to be a republican or a Jew, do you?

  330. now that i've cooled down a bit.... by Achernar · · Score: 1

    One of the problems with American society that I've always hated is that we don't seem to give a damn until something happens to us.

    Look at WWII. We didn't care about anything else going on in the world until someone decided to go ahead and plow over one of our military bases (whether or not you think we knew about that is a little irrelevant).

    Instance: the problems in the Middle East. The general U.S. thought is that we should just tell everyone that we don't like what's going on in other parts of the world; if they don't bother us, then it's not really that much of a problem.

    Make no mistake right now; this country is at war. We don't know against whom yet, and we won't find that out for a while, but there's no doubt in my mind that this is an act of war. Now I don't think that we should go around and tell everyone else in the world how they need to act or what we think they should be doing (God, we don't need to be the world's police), but I do think we should be more involved.

    I don't think that there's too many Americans who would argue with us going over to wherever these people are from, killing them, burning their land, and then salting it forever. I'm not necessarily saying that I agree with this, but I do think that retalitation is the right thing to do.

    Take Desert Storm, for instance. There were two ways that we could have handled that situation. We could have said, "Oh, that's OK, doesn't bother us, go ahead and take over Kuwait," or we could have said "You know what? Don't bully people around - you keep this up, and we'll come kick your ass."

    What happened was that we did some kind of half-assed attack where we moved in, showed them that we didn't like what they were doing, and then let them go about their business and continue planning the downfall of their neighboring nations and of America. We should have either left them alone, or completely destroyed their economy and military systems.

    I still think that the US has the unparalleled ability to make war and to do it successfully and decisively.

    I, for the most part, am simply of the opinion that we should not roll over and say, "well, you got us, and we give up, just don't do it again."

    I'm not going to say anything else until we figure out who did this, because my presuppositions are going to get the better of em and I'm going to say something else that is wayyyy too stupid. :)

  331. UA site is a little vague by SilentReproach · · Score: 1

    I'm here in Verona PA, which is about 60 miles from Johnstown PA, where UA says the crash was near. I'm just here on business, but the locals tell me that the crash was actually in a field near Shanksville PA, 20 miles outside of Johnstown.
    Karma seems so worthless today, and information so valuable :-(

    --
    Religion is the opium of the people. Evolution is the opium of scientists.
  332. Not!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot was most certainly NOT first. They just jumped on the bandwagon, and were probably one of the few sites built to handle bandwidth, but not linked to anyone's browser's preinstalled homepage, where everyone clicked to visit cnn.

    Taco's getting a little megalomaniac about it, thinking he's got the scoop, or is the lone reporter braving the dangers in a country of war. None of this is true. I don't think it's possible for TV stations to get slashdotted, case in point.

  333. Re:How many people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2,280 people died at Pearl Harbor. That's about 10,000 families ruined.

    I suspect that today's death toll will be, oh, at least ten times that. I prefer to think of it in terms of how many families will be destroyed or nearly so by the events of the day. About 100,000, at least. Each woman who died was someone's daughter, and someone's mother, and someone's wife, and someone's sister, and someone's friend. Equivalently so for each man who died. Lots of misery for all to share - the price of supporting the Israeli persecution of the Palestinians. It would have been better if we had not allowed the use of our weapons by the Israeli military.

  334. Sources by Benjamin+Shniper · · Score: 2

    Training commercial pilots? What is your source for this information?

    Osama said he would cause devestation in America in response to America's support of Israel. I take it this support will greatly increase for the time being.

    This is a declaration of war. We are at war. As of 4:07 on Tuesday, we don't know who we are at war with. I would venture a guess that an invasion of Afganistan is being considerred, and that Israel will have a temporary Carte Blanche on their actions against the Palestinians.

    But we have lost more people to violence (if we lost half the 50,000 people in the WTC) than we have ever lost in a day of American history before (previous civil war record of 22,000). And more than we lost in many other wars as well.

    I wonder what affect this will have on the economy and the NYSE...

    -Ben

  335. Parent? Flamebait? cmon...tacky, but a good pt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    but definitely not flamebait...did you moderators READ the article(s) the previous poster is talking about? Hello, donations, fundamentalist mideastern terrorist groups? Pull yer heads out, it sounded relevent to me.

  336. And the Emmy goes to: by underwhelm · · Score: 1

    For supporting role in causing the WTC to collapse: *gravity*. Ever play Jenga?

    --

    I don't need large brains to have a good time.

  337. You are SO uneducated about what REALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is going on...I won't bother wasting time trying to explain it to you, Joe-uneducated-click-clickchangethechannelformores oundbytes Sixpack dumbass..it's not about religion, really, it'a about genocide, racism, occupation, and human rights...oh yeah...Islam believes in the SAME GOD fuckwad

  338. Slashdot Strikes Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, we have a fine collection of very able programmers and the like here, how 'bout a little demonstration, aimed at any and all web sites promoting terrorism in all its forms?

    Nothing organized, nothing planned, just give a little back to the society that has nurtured (most of) us.

    Geeks of the Internet, Unite!

  339. Terrorism & Reality by seinethinker · · Score: 1

    I have looked at many comments coming from Americans. I am thoroughly saddened and berieved by the events that have taken place. However, it is not prudent or logical to run around with our heads lopped off like chickens for the slaughter.

    Justice must and will prevail. I do not agree with a war like attitude. I dispise the news broadcasters for mentioning war and Pearl Harbor. This is just not the same as Pearl Harbor. Why rehash history? This is something of a reality shaker. It is time to wake up and realize that we and the world are extremely vulnerable.

    Now more than ever do we need to bond together and work to erradicate hatred, violence and the like.

    I have personally in my 24 years of exsistence have not agreed with our stance on the battle between Israel and Palestine. However, I feel Palestine and Israel are fighting a futile struggle. Neither are accomplishing anything but tearing the land, people, and world apart. So many people are dying and for what???? Land??? Religion???

    Yes, I understand the nature of a cause. I will not condone their bloodshed nor ours. However, if countries are going to affect other countries... there needs to be organizations to resolve these matters... Someone must Police.. Unfortunately, since we have such a foothold... We are one of the Policers and with that comes tremendous burdens...

    Those who do not believe in freedom or civility will react harshly. I won't say we have always made the best decisions. No one is ever perfect. Running a country and making decisions that can affect the world is a stressful task.

    The gluttony and greed of the world never cease to amaze me even as sometimes it takes the shroud of a religious habit.

    --
    Truth like surgery, may hurt, but it cures. - Han Suyin, Chinese Physician and Writer
  340. You've been sucked in well and truly by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    First, know that I have no sympathy for the attackers or any of the people behind them, and although definitely non-violent by nature, would kill any one of them with my bare hands if it would help to reduce the damage. The needs of any one of the many killed or maimed outweigh the needs of one dickhead who thinks he knows how to fix problems by hurting and killing innocent people.
    When it comes to killing, no one knows how to do it better than Americans, this they will learn.

    Yes, I believe it's called ``scorched earth.'' But success with other than overwhemling firepower is harder to come by.

    Think about the fact that these assholes attacked the WTC before the Pentagon. Think about it long and hard. Why?

    Think about the stupid anti-terrorism rules that the USA already has. Think about how much those rules intrude into the lives of Americans, and how little they've done to stop this wretched act of terrorism.

    Think about the BATF filling someone's house with flammable gas and blowing it up, murdering hundreds of poeple inside. Think about the observation that when the Oklahoma building was blown up from the inside with multiple charges, the BATF offices just happened to be empty, but a day-care centre was left full of children.

    Use your collective brains! You speak of the people behind this, but what if the people behind it were really Americans, as happened during World War II? Hitler's Reich would have been impossible without much US finanace and other intervention (e.g. suppression of alternative fuel research in USA by means of patents, promotion of same research in Germany). Pearl Harbour would have been impossible without a great deal of prior US strategy to basically force the Japanese to do something. Don't be a puppet again!

    If your reaction is typical of a US citizen, well, welcome back to the Dark Ages: goodbye, personal freedom (in the name of ``greater common good''); goodbye safety, particularly for any minority; hello, police state; hello fear; hello uncertainty. And this: hello, unfettered control of the world's single most powerful military force.

    Time to look at history, carefully, before you repeat it.

    T h i n k !

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:You've been sucked in well and truly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen.

      Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither freedom nor security.

      Ben Frankin
      (paraphrased)

    2. Re:You've been sucked in well and truly by XarsonX · · Score: 1

      what he was saying i believe will come to pass.
      what he is saying probably is what all americans are saying right now. enough americans to make the retribution come. even if they did nothing to stop pearl harbour and even if it was planned we still got revenge on japan. and the same thing will happen now. we will go after any one related to the act and they will be fucking killed.

      rambling sorry

    3. Re:You've been sucked in well and truly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am glad to know that Most Patriotic Americans DONT agree with you.I hope G. Bush finds these terrorists and executes them on live television.........Texan

  341. Re:Connected with the raids on the Islamic datafar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've thought of that one, as have *many* other people. I think the answer is no, but not because I have a clue. It's just a gut feeling.

  342. They have to be fought for every day. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    What you said indicates that you don't understand the costs and loss of rights. Usually rights are not just taken away in one fell swoop, but rights are eroded over time. Now, to have a license, you must provide your social security number to the state, its to protect the children from deadbeat dads. To cash a check, most banks require finger printing. When you drive your car, you are tracked. When you go to the superbowl, your face is checked against a database.

  343. The basic problem is religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Religion is at the root of a great deal of what is wrong with the world today. The idea that there are invisible things that want us to behave in certain ways - is there anyone who doubts that these attacks were made by islamic fundies?

  344. gallows humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    webcam of missing WTC

    It would be funny if it weren't so sad.

  345. This IS the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This IS the time to think clearly and this horrible incedent, like every horrible incedent in the 20th Century , will be used to strip more freedom away from the sovereign citizens of the US "for their own good".

  346. The Pentegon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NBC just said 800 dead and wounded.

    Why hit where they did on the pentegon? I asked myself this all day. The White House or Capital building make better political targets. So why there?

    My theory, and it is only that but seems to make sense to me.

    After the news of the WTC the emergency planning takes effect and the top brass head for the heliport to be taken away to safety.

    If they wanted to take out the top people the helipad was a very logical target, especially considering the delay between the Pentegon and WTC.

    The military term for taking out the leadership of the enemy is decapitation.

  347. Re:Have you ever read `Stranger in a strange land' by phatlipmojo · · Score: 1

    Either that or some times are just not times for levity.

    --

    Nice things are nicer than nasty ones.
  348. 50/50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see two extremes posted here and both are 50/50 right/wrong.

    It is common legal precedent that harboring a criminal or not reporting criminal activity is in and of itself a crime. A lesser crime than the typical criminal activity though. This aiding and abeiting.

    But a witness that does not come forward is also an entirely different matter than one who covers up after having been discovered. This is obstruction.

    Just like Christianity there are splinter factions in Islam. The true Islamic follows priciples almost identical to true Christianity.

    Also like Christianity has their groups that distort the "religion" to their own ends, such as the white militant groups, Nazism, KKK; Islam also has their fringe groups that use and twist Islam into something it is not.

    Arafat and Osama fall squarely into this latter category for Islam just as David Duke and Al Sharpton does for Christianity (it's far from a "white" thing)

    Everyone should withhold judgement until the true culprits are found. Don't forget that the Middle East was originally blamed for Oklahoma City and many reporters and "experts" ate crow. But the damage had been done and many Americans of MidEast origin endured unforgivable scrutiny.

    1. Re:50/50 by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I live near Boston. They found a vehicle of five suspects with instructions on how to fly a plane in Arabic, and one of the terrorist forgot there bag, in it among the other items was a copy of the koran. This news has been known since yesterday afternoon (Tuesday afternoon) in the New England area.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  349. More likely.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this is retaliation for something that occured in the last couple of weeks (very unlikely since this would have take several months of planning, training the terrorist pilots, etc) then it would more likely be the UN race summit that went down in shambles last week after a faction of psudo Muslim states tried to declare Zionism as racist, and demanding reparations.

    The US and most US allies walked and the summit fell apart.

  350. something strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watching the news coverage of the attack on wpix between 3:10am and 3:25am eastern time.I then noticed the scrolling ticker at the bottom of the screen read "War has been decleared and as a country at war we should exercise diferent options than a country at peace." I am not sure if those were the exact words and those words don't sound strange in times like anyway but it got my attention. Following that the ticker began to read "Arizona Republic of Pheniox." Then the ticker flashed and when it came back I could see more had been Written but I couldn't read it because it only came back briefly. After that I was trying to figure out what the heck the Arizona Republic of Pheniox was when the next ticker started and I noticed it was not in the same font as before. Mabey it was just a quote and someone just cut it off early but I tried to look up the Arizona Rebpublic of Pheniox all over the internet and found nothing. If anyone knows anything about this could you please reply to this post

  351. This attack wasnt hard to do... by okrobot · · Score: 1

    I keep hearing about the difficulty of this attack. In actuality, if you fly at all, you would know, this attack wouldn't be that hard to execute.

    1.Get people into the US (this would not be to hard, as we have people from other countries coming in all the time. Just need people without suspicious pasts. Of course they have to be soo brainwashed that they would kill themselves for the cause.)

    2.Cordinate through Gnutella (Gnutella would make a good communications medium)

    3.Create composite knives out of porcelain, or grab a pen then take over an airplane (flash a sharp weapon rush the cockpit, keep killing until the doors are opened. Kill the pilots (planes aren't that hard to fly once they are flying) change course, your on your way)

    4.Kill, kill, and kill...

    If you look at it, these assholes were willing to die. They exploited weaknesses in some of our systems, but these exploits were far from hard. They deserve no credit for what they have done. It was too simple, and that is what scares me. It equates to a lowly DOS attack. Bastards...

    I send my love to those involved-- stay strong. Our country has failed us, but know it is all too apparent now-- things will change.

    --
    -Those who have a not thorough insight into both the signification and purpose of words, will be under chances.
  352. Sorry Boys and Girls by ender- · · Score: 2

    Sorry, but this mirror is now down...