Slashdot Mirror


Fox Considering a Return of "Family Guy"

wo1verin3 writes: "USA Today is reporting that all is not lost and due to exceptionally strong DVD sales Family Guy may return with as many as 35 new episodes! A DVD set of the show's first 28 episodes, released in April, has sold nearly 1 million copies, making it this year's top-selling TV show and the No. 4 television title ever, according to Video Store magazine."

694 comments

  1. woohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    woo hoo :)

    1. Re:woohoo by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a Simpsons quote there.

      I believe the appropiate term in this case would be "This is freakin awesome!"

      --
      Sigs are for losers
    2. Re:woohoo by welthqa · · Score: 1

      This is one of the happiest moments of my life. The only happier one will be if it does come back on.
      Now if only there was some way to raise from the dead Harry Goz. I want my sealab2021 back too.

      --


      100% Pure Evil With The Look And Feel Of Wholesome Goodness
    3. Re:woohoo by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you mean "Giggidy Giggidy!" ?

    4. Re:woohoo by SiaFhir · · Score: 1

      ...or, "Swehehehet"

    5. Re:woohoo by tbase · · Score: 1

      Don't listen to them- I totally said Whoo Hoo! When I read this. In fact, I busted a gut laughing when I saw your post, just after sent a message to my bud about this with that as the subject :-)

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    6. Re:woohoo by Ronin_Bic · · Score: 1

      sealab is gone??

    7. Re:woohoo by welthqa · · Score: 1

      it is because Capt'n Murphy is dead in RL. I don't know how they will replace him.

      --


      100% Pure Evil With The Look And Feel Of Wholesome Goodness
  2. Family Guy.. by BrainsVolpe · · Score: 1

    All I can say is that I hope this go through and that it doesn't suck if it comes back...

    1. Re:Family Guy.. by GaelenBurns · · Score: 2, Funny

      Come on... The Family Guy is freakin' sweet!

    2. Re:Family Guy.. by calebtucker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Everyone can thank me. I told the fox network executives that my kid was dying and his last wish was to have another season of Family Guy.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    3. Re:Family Guy.. by rmaniac · · Score: 3, Funny

      But.. they look like pepperoni

    4. Re:Family Guy.. by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

      mmmmmhuh....mmmmhuh......mmmmmmmhuh.....

      Criminal: Do you do anything else?

      mmmmmhuh....mmmmhuh......mmmmmmmhuh.....

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    5. Re:Family Guy.. by dwillden · · Score: 5, Funny
      Everyone can thank me. I told the fox network executives that my kid was dying and his last wish was to have another season of Family Guy.
      So please, everybody forwards this post on to at least 10 friends. Fox is tracking this post and will donate one additional episode for every ten thousand forwards.
      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    6. Re:Family Guy.. by Kentamanos · · Score: 1

      Paraphrase I know...

      Lois: Brian and Greg Gumble are brothers.

      Peter: Just because they're black we can't learn from them?

    7. Re:Family Guy.. by glenebob · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow! No wonder people do drugs!

    8. Re:Family Guy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about coincidence. I happen to be watching that same episode as I'm reading the comments.

    9. Re:Family Guy.. by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      *amazed to here something good has come out of this incredibly bad day*

      I enjoy Family Guy for its spot-on grasp of the sense of humor of its target demographic. There was always something to make me laugh out loud at least three times an episode.

      There is truly some genius in that show. Same for (IMHO) The Oblongs. Or perhaps it is just my twisted sense of humor.

      The scene in Family Guy S2E14 "Let's Go To The Hop", where Lois and Peter are slipping into their BDSM gear while dicussing the problems facing kids today may well be the funniest thing I have ever seen in animation. And, *laughing* I'm pretty sure done by someone who knew what they were talking about at the time.

      YMMV.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    10. Re:Family Guy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must disagree, the scene in the episode in which Peter gets in touch with his feminine side, and then "suckles" Stewie is the funniest thing I have EVER seen in my life. :)

    11. Re:Family Guy.. by Spamlent+Green · · Score: 1

      I think you mean 'wicked awesome'

    12. Re:Family Guy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to agree on that one. I'm not one to laugh out loud when I'm alone, but that one really stuck with me. And the look on Stewie's face...

    13. Re:Family Guy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All i have to say is FUCK YEAH

    14. Re:Family Guy.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome Stewie, our new overlord.

      Oh.. wait.. Blast I quoted the wrong show.

  3. Stewie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Stewie Lives :)

    1. Re:Stewie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frodo Lives!

      Darth Vader is Luke's Father!

    2. Re:Stewie by Comatose51 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Victory is ours!

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    3. Re:Stewie by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Stewie lives, but his campaign for governor didn't work out.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:Stewie by noisehole · · Score: 1

      the broccoli must die!

  4. Best Move Ever... by JuJue · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All I gotta say is...its about damn time

    1. Re:Best Move Ever... by notoriousE · · Score: 1

      For real! I just about crapped my pants when I saw this article! Stewie will have his wrath on your pathetic adult mind!

      --


      And then there was E
    2. Re:Best Move Ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Forget Family Guy, bring back Futurama!

      Fry: How did I get Leela to love me? I've got to figure it out.
      Hermes: Maybe you're just a fantastic lover, Fry.
      Amy: No.

  5. Better Than The Simpsons? by Slider451 · · Score: 1

    Never got into this show. How is it better than the Simpsons or King of the Hill?

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    1. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by miketang16 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've obviously never watched it then... Family Guy is levels upon levels above King of the Hill, and in my opinion actually better than the Simpsons too. It mixes an awesome blend of 'stupid' humor with underlying intelligent themes.

      --
      -------
      "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
      -- George Orwell
    2. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fucking hilarious. Some jokes are contrived and drag on, but otherwise it has been consistently funny for the first three seasons.

      IMO

    3. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's funnier. Far, far funnier than King of the Hill, and averaging funnier than recent seasons of the Simpsons.

    4. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Andorion · · Score: 4, Informative

      Family guy has more witty comedy packed into a half hour than any other show I've seen... it's offensive at times (Stewie often plots to kill his mom, and unlike Homer who's funny because of his ignorant, Peter is ignorant and often often *mean*). Still, if that sort of humor doesn't bother you there are some real gems in each episode, real "laugh out loud" moments, which is rare nowadays.

      ~Berj

    5. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by IncredibleCrisis · · Score: 1

      It's not fifteen years old, and riding on the coattails of its golden age stuff.

    6. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by macshune · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's also good because it's one of the only times in life when you get rewarded for watching shitloads of tv shows and commercials during the 70s, 80s & 90s (as in, you get the jokes:).

    7. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by ericspinder · · Score: 1

      You need to watch it on Adult Swim (Cartoon Network) at 11:30 pm. It was an orginal, just like "The Simpson's" was... Like on the recent Simpson's" Holloween special Homer became Death. To paraphrase from South Park "Family Guy did it".

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    8. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      King of the HILL?! Sure, asking how much better it is than then Simpsons (well, the last few seasons anyway) is a fair question. But King of the Hill?! Fam. Guy is a million times funnier.

    9. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Heh, but Family Guy did rip off the Simpsons a lot. Remember the gag when Peter was trying to eat popcorn and the bird kept grabbing it? That's stright up simpsons rip-off, homer did the same exact gag. There's a lot of stuff like that, especially a lot of the simple gags.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    10. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Family Guy actually utilizes the same basic premise behind the Simpsons, and borrows quite a bit from the show:
      - a show about a family with 3 kids
      - the father is a moron
      - the wife is usually the sane/careful one
      - setting is in a fictional American town, although in Family Guy, we at least know the state (Rhode Island)
      - the children are a boy, girl, and a baby
      - the father spends a lot of time at the bar

      There's a few others. The biggest differences in the two have to deal with the fact that the family pet (Brian, a walking, talking, alcoholic mutt) is personified, as well as the baby (Stewie, who has napoleonic tendencies) Needless to say, I've enjoyed both shows enough to consider myself a big fan of each.

      --
      Sigs are for losers
    11. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Kentamanos · · Score: 5, Informative

      The show is very clever. Some of the things they parody are brilliant.

      Ever seen the episode where Stewie says "I know what it takes to be cool" and then imagines himself doing an Elton John "Rocket Man" spoken word exactly like the one William Shatner did?

      Ever seen the episode with the National Gun Association? They talk about how child gun safety is a top priority. They then show a video with a kid talking to a puppet gun (Petey the Pistol, I believe). Petey says he gets lonely and wants the kid to hold him. He also says "when you squeeze me, I make the bad people go away". Insanely funny...

      I know I'm not doing these two scenes in particular justice, but the show really is great. Find a friend who has the DVDs and give them a watch or check out the episodes on Adult Swim.

    12. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "...setting is in a fictional American town, although in Family Guy, we at least know the state (Rhode Island)"

      The Simpsons are set in Oregon, more here...
      http://www.portlandtribune.com/archview.c gi?id=123 92
      http://www.portlandtribune.com/archview.cgi?id =126 27
      http://www.portlandtribune.com/archview.cgi?id =126 25

      There used to be a map on the Portland Tribune site about it.

      Matt is from Portland although I argue that the Springfield vs. Shelbyville rivalry comes from Eugene and Springfield, but it might come from Portland and Vancouver Wa or Eastside vs Westside.

    13. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by critter_hunter · · Score: 3, Funny

      So the only way to get rewarded of wasting most of your youth is to be able to get some jokes while you waste away more of your life.. woop dee fucking doo!

      ...

      ... is what I would say if I wasn't wasting *my* youth on Slashdot ;)

      --
      Karma: Could be worse (could be raining)
    14. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by MurphyZero · · Score: 1
      The Simpsons are set in Oregon, more here...
      Simpsons have gone out of their way to confuse the state issue. In the "Behind the Laughter" the narrator specifically mentions "this Northern Kentucky family" But since this was the story of the 'actors' behind the Simpsons (Homer's idea to create a show based on his family), that doesn't necessarily mean that the Simpsons is set in Northern Kentucky, keeping the confusion alive
      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    15. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Noren · · Score: 4, Funny
      Some tidbits:
      Brian: Hola! Um...me, me llamo es Brian. Ahh, uh, um lets see, uh, nosotros queremos ir con ustedes.
      Mexican: Hey, that was pretty good! But actually when you said, "Me llamo es Brian," you don't need the "es." Just, "Me llamo Brian."
      Brian{relieved}: Oh, you speak English!
      Mexican: No, just that first speech and this one explaining it.
      Brian{confused}: You...you're kidding right?
      Mexican: Que?

      (Evil genius toddler attempting to phone home)
      Stewie: Hello, operator, hello? Oh that's right, you have to dial in the numbers these...hmmm, I should know this, oh yes, 867-5309, that's it! No wait, that's not right...DAMN YOU TOMMY TWOTONE! *sigh* Well, I guess there's only one way to find out... 111-1111, Lois? ... DAMN! 111-1112, Lois? ... DAMN! 111-1113, Lois? ... DAMN! {commercial break}

    16. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by TheFlamingoKing · · Score: 1
      King of the Hill is only truly funny if you live in Texas.

      -

    17. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Corbin+Dallas · · Score: 1

      woop dee fucking doo!

      Woop Dee Fuck Yourself. Family Guy had tons of references to earlier pop culture, but that's not all there is... duh. Just watch it... or don't. I don't care.

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
    18. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by linuxpyro · · Score: 1

      The Simpsons hasn't been as good as it used to be in the last few years, so lately Family Guy does have an edge over it, in my opinion. But I still watch The Simpsons, and it is unique. I don't think anything will really replace it.

      --
      Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
    19. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the best this show has to offer? No wonder it got cancelled.

    20. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Kentamanos · · Score: 1

      On Rottentomatoes (movie website mainly), the discussion about Simpsons vs. Family Guy (and sometimes Southpark gets thrown in) comes up often.

      In the end, most rational people agree that the volume of work in the Simpsons gives it the edge. It's easy to forget the past.

      The writing in Southpark (especially the last couple of seaons) and the writing in Family Guy are superior to recent Simpsons activity though.

    21. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by r00zky · · Score: 1

      How is it better than the Simpsons
      Maybe they draw characters without diabetes?

      --
      I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
    22. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by philthedrill · · Score: 3, Funny

      Matt is from Portland although I argue that the Springfield vs. Shelbyville rivalry comes from Eugene and Springfield

      That may make sense. There was an episode of Futurama which had a spoof of the Iron Chef, and in the beginning, Bender was a robo (Robot Hobo):

      Hobo: Welcome to Bumbase Alpha, the biggest hobo jungle in the quadrant.
      Bender: I've seen bigger. Oh wait, I'm thinking of Eugene, Oregon.

    23. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Kentamanos · · Score: 1

      Read the end of his comment. I'm pretty sure he was joking :).

    24. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Overdrive_SS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think I watched that episode last night(I was programming at the same time, so I wasn't particularly glued to the screen) but I believe both of your examples are in the same episode. Oh, and the Simpsons are still better, you just have to watch the right seasons.

    25. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      That was so funny, especially since Eugene has a huge hobo population during the summer.

      Read a piece about it about 15 years ago in the Register Guard (Eugene's paper) seems that hobos regularly rain to Arizona and Florida for the winter, then come back up north for the summers. Eugene has a large rail capacity and thus it's Grand Central Station for the Western Crested Hobo.

    26. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by p4ul13 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It should also be noted that King of the Hill has rarely been funny. C'mon who really watches that?

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    27. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by bigfatdonny · · Score: 1

      Heh...heh...heh...you, you remember...you know...that time?

      Dork.

    28. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      They gave the area code once, it placed the simpons in misouri.

    29. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by jchernia · · Score: 2, Funny

      The beauty of the Family Guy was it was so unapologetically low brow. (Chris and Peter are looking at a whale) Chris: Dad, what's a blowhole for? Peter: I'll tell you what it's NOT for, and then you'll know why I can never go back to Sea World.

    30. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Kentamanos · · Score: 1

      You're right. When I stop and think about it, they are in the same episode. I've seen everything from Seasons 1-3, but apparently that one is fresh on the mind.

      I agree Simpsons are better over their respective lifetimes, but I'd take the last X number of Family Guy episoders over the last X number of Simpsons episodes where X = number of Family Guy episodes :).

    31. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Corbin+Dallas · · Score: 1

      Hmm... you might be right. Guess I've still got that knee-jerk reaction to possible Family Guy negatives, much like Peter's nervous twitch when he asked Feebee Diamond out to the prom.

      Uhh, err, sorry about that. I'll take you off my foe list critter_hunter. :-)

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
    32. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      King of the Hill is a cartoon, but it's treated like a standard sitcom. You could film it with real people and without rewriting the script. Compare that to the Simpsons or Family Guy - both will break away to show impossible things happening. The advantage of cartoons is that it's no harder to draw in a spoof of Home Alone 14 than it is to draw Homer eating donuts. With film and actors, that sort of thing doesn't happen -- though it could, Saturday night live, Mad TV, even late-night talk shows do it.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    33. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by nosredna · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've always been of the opinion that the jokes that drag on and on for considerably longer than sanity might dictate are done that way for a reason. Watch Adam West talking about Taffee in 'E Peterbus Unum' It's worth a little laugh, but it drags on until it's not funny, then drags on even longer until it's actually funny again. Same thing with the 'Wasted Talent' when Peter falls and hurts his knee. Then you laugh even harder when he does it again later in the episode.

    34. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      he said Missouri actually

    35. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      When three children you have, all the time at bar you spend.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    36. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by xSauronx · · Score: 2, Funny
      *lois knocks on quagmires door*

      *quagmire opens door*
      Quagmire: Hey Lois, excuse me for pointing!

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    37. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      no.

    38. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Your+Login+Here · · Score: 1

      You could film it with real people and without rewriting the script

      Of course then the actors would start complainging about how much screen time they're getting, they would have to start doing Boomhauer-centric episodes to keep some of the actors happy, and Luanne would have left the show to pursue her movie carreer.

      And people are shocked by the popularity of reality TV.

      Also keep in mind that if they used real actors Bobby would be done highschool by now (or at least close to.. I don't know his exact age).

    39. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by interociter · · Score: 4, Funny
      It's the humor of repetition. If you do something funny once, it's funny. A second time is less funny. The third time establishes a deliberate pattern, which is funny. 4, 5 and 6 are far less funny because you're milking it. The seventh time is comic gold because you've established that you are deliberately taking it way beyond the point where it would be funny, which is funny. Don't do 8. Just don't. You know who does 8? Paul Reiser.

      Specific example: In the Simpsons episode where Sideshow Bob is out of prison on work release, and he keeps stepping on rakes. The longer it goes, the funnier it is. The third time the bit is repeated, he keeps stepping on one rake after another, which is hilarious.

      Caveat: If what you're doing isn't funny, no amount of repetition will save you. Case in point: "You like-a the juice?"

      Final point: there's very little that's less funny than someone talking in technical terms about why something is funny.

      --
      Interociter
      -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
    40. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guys: Did you enjoy your snow cone Peter?
      Peter: The first one was good, but that yellow one tasted like...hey! you guys are jerks!

    41. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by agrippa_cash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OK, I cannot let people disparage King of the Hill any longer. It is a good show that is funnier when you know the characters. Stewie is funny but has no depth, watch Bobby Hill for a season and you will think he is damn funny too. I liked the Family Guy quite a bit, but it never approached the Simpsons at their best. And to those people why say Family Guy was a subtile show: There is a difference between subtile and obscure (and the difference itself is neither). Family Guy was too uneven to be great, and the total lack of a coherent universe around them was funny, but quickly became, as Stewie would say "Old Hat". But, yes it was better than most other shows.

    42. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by bash_jeremy · · Score: 1

      Brian: Hola! Um...me, me llamo es Brian. Ahh, uh, um lets see, uh, nosotros queremos ir con ustedes.
      Mexican: Hey, that was pretty good! But actually when you said, "Me llamo es Brian," you don't need the "es." Just, "Me llamo Brian."
      Brian{relieved}: Oh, you speak English!
      Mexican: No, just that first speech and this one explaining it.
      Brian{confused}: You...you're kidding right?
      Mexican: Que?


      It's funny, except it was stolen from Home Alone 1.

    43. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Lazlo+Nibble · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree with the other responders to this message: TFG is much, much wittier than The Simpsons. They're also less afraid to go for the cheap shot, and the musical bits just knock me on my ass. (Don't get me started on those flaccid "Evita" takeoffs on The Simpsons the other day -- yecccch!)

      Most significantly to me, Family Guy doesn't succumb to a sitcom-ish last-two-minutes-of-the-episode personal-redemption jones. The Simpsons seems to be constitutionally incapable of wrapping things up on a mean-spirited note. Nobody ever "learns a valuable lesson" on The Family Guy; it's kinda like Seinfeld or Curb Your Enthusiasm in that sense.

      It's obviously a matter of personal taste, but if you haven't seen The Family Guy you should at least give it a shot. When it first aired I dumped it after a couple of episodes because the whole "Stewie killing Lois" thing was way too overwrought for me, but after jumping back in for the Adult Swim airings I realized just how good a show it is. Arguably it's the most tightly-written network comedy in recent memory.

      (I would leave King of the Hill out of the discussion, because it's a completely different kind of show -- much more grounded and less reliant on pop-culture references and flights of whimsy and "wackiness" than TFG or Simpsons, or even your average network sitcom.)

    44. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by bash_jeremy · · Score: 1

      Oh wait, what the hell am I thinking? That was something else. :(

    45. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      "Excuse me, would you like to taste my smoked meat log?"

      God, that gets me every time!
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    46. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      No one remembers, but on one episode, they actually referred to them as a "Northern Kentucky Family".

    47. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      I think I've seen this on another show before, maybe the simpsons?

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    48. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Peter on a bus headed for the Women's Retreat:

      "OK, I'll be Charlie, and you can all be my angels". Then pointing to a less-attractive woman, "except you. You be Bosley".

    49. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by theperplepigg · · Score: 1

      636 is eastern missouri, nowhere near the actual springfield, mo. the other/original area code for springfield in that episode was 939 - Puerto Rico. This makes me doubt the validity of these area codes as real clues. ;)

      --
      -- Every time you kill a kitten, God masturbates.
    50. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember - guns don't kill people: dangerous minorities do!

    51. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by slaker · · Score: 1

      King of the Hill is justification for giving Texas back to Mexico.
      As if George Bush isn't a good enough reason.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    52. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by jerkychew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even funnier is the fact that I modded this as "funny".

    53. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by illuminatedwax · · Score: 1

      Really, when Family Guy started out, it really was a sort of copy of the Simpsons...but then after a while, it switched around and Simpsons began sort of copying Family Guy's gags and style.

      Now we have an entire story from Treehouse of Horror that completely steals the plot line from an episode of Family Guy. What's worse is that the Family Guy episode was about 50x funnier.

      --Stephen

      --
      Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    54. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by mkldev · · Score: 1
      Yes, but Springfield isn't in northern Kentucky. It's just shy of halfway up the state....

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    55. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by ejdmoo · · Score: 1

      Wrong again...it was a joke, as was the whole episode, that pretended the Simpsons were actors. "But don't believe me. Observe this commerical!"

      http://www.snpp.com/guides/lisa-3.html#3.2.2

    56. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually they used both. He said Kentucky during the original airing, but when they aired it as a rerun they said Missouri.

      Now that's subtle humor.

    57. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I always found the humor in the Simpons to be much more subtle and sophisticated than Family Guy. There are a ton of hidden jokes in the Simpons that they don't draw attention to, whereas Family Guy beats you over the head with them.

      One of my favorites was Marge going to the party store to buy some stuff. The store was called "Donner's Party Supply" and there was a sign in the window that said "Winter Madness Sale." Family Guy has to put out their sophisticated humor front-and-center. As a result, I find the Simpons something you can watch multiple times and still manage to pick up something new, while with Family Guy when you've seen it once, you've seen it all.

    58. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by djroute66 · · Score: 1

      Or the time Peter was fighting the Chicken who gave him a bum gift certificate. At first it was just funny. Then got stupid pretty quick. But after it developed it was frickin' hilarious.

    59. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by NeoMoose · · Score: 1

      Never got into this show. How is it better than the Simpsons or King of the Hill?

      That's very simple. The Simpsons has grown stale and King of the Hill has ALWAYS sucked.

    60. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      Peter to Lois: Are you pregnant?

      Lois: No.

      Peter: Good. *shoves Lois down the stairs*

      Me: *gives himself a hernia laughing*

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    61. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Eisenstein · · Score: 0

      So the only way to get rewarded of wasting most of your youth is to be able to get some jokes while you waste away more of your life. Yeah, it is great, isn't it? The perfect show for the average Slashdotter.

    62. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by jgkastra · · Score: 1

      TFG is much, much wittier than The Simpsons.

      Well, as Reading Digest says, "Brevity is...wit."

    63. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      King of the Hill and Family Guy are two completely different things. Comparing them is like comparing Apples to Oranges.

      Comparing Family Guy and The Simpsons is like comparing Fujis to Jona Gold. They are simialar in many ways. The families are almost complete copies of each other in terms of numbers. Brian is almost a knockoff of Homer Simpson.

      But again, they kinda go in a different direction. Family Guy goes for the more offensive side of things. It's almost like combining The Simpsons and South Park.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    64. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      This would explain the vast array of terrain available in Springfield. We know that it borders the ocean. We also know that it has a virtually unclimbable mountain called "Mount Sprinfield".

      The Sherpas and AppleBars were a really nice touch ;-)

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    65. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      It would have been funnier if the "Itchy and Scratchy" episode featured the same gag ... Save Scratchy would ultimately die some grizzly death from protruding nails or something like that.

      BTW, I consider Terrance & Phillip a psuedo-knockoff of the Itchy & Scratchy concept of the Simpsons.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    66. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      The early episodes of Simpsons were awesome. I remember how I watched and taped every episede, and then wathced the tapes. Then it started to suck. I stopped wathing the new episodes on tape, then I stopped taping them. Then I stopped watching the show altogether. The later episodes of the Simpsons are pure, 100% crap. They should have stopped the series while it was still good.

      I would say that Family Guy is right up there with the early episodes of Simpsons. Both are funny, but in different ways. King of The Hill? It's crap. Pure and simple.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    67. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Oh, and the Simpsons are still better, you just have to watch the right seasons.


      Yeah, the first few seasons. None of the later crap they have been airing recently.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    68. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Although the concept of a regular guy becoming Death isn't all that new. Everything is ripped off from someone, somewhere.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    69. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      True, but even the Simpsons ripped stuff off. It's not as if every episode of that show is totally new and has a completely original plot.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    70. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      King of the Hill is only really funny if you live in Texas, have lived in Texas in the past, or know people that live/have lived in Texas that can explain to you why it's funny.

      What will really freak you out is when you start to understand what Boomhauer is saying. I know people like that.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    71. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by hatchet · · Score: 1

      you can compare apples to oranges...
      I can even compare apples to a train or space ship.

    72. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Family Guy... so good it got CANCELLED!

    73. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by anethema · · Score: 1

      There must be a lot of texans because I dont live there, and have never lived there, and just as you said, its VERY not funny. It just seems like some show, always trying to teach some moral at the end.
      I have watched a good few episodes because it just happens here that there is one 1/2 hour period between shows i like in which king of the hill is the only thing on. I have seen maybe 20 eps and have never so much as chuckled during any period of it.
      So enough texans must be around to keep it in fox's primetime lineup, because I dont see how else it would be there.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    74. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, hey man, just wanted to leave you a note saying I really liked what you said, I so got every "hidden" joke in your post, like how perfectly "Paul Reiser" fits the role of someone who would "do 8", hehehe. Anyway, yeah, I'm just really stoned and thought it was really cool/interesting to see a brain that thinks a lot like mine ;-)

    75. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      It always buged me he didn't start with 000-0000, 000-0001

    76. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Peter is ignorant and often often *mean*).
      What the hell does mean mean? The cambridge dictionary says: 1. express 2. not generous 3. not kind 4. violent 5. good. Ah, the english language...
    77. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by miketang16 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Brian is almost a knockoff of Homer Simpson.

      Uh, yea... if Homor went to Brown and was very intelligent. The only similarity is the alcoholism.

      --
      -------
      "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
      -- George Orwell
    78. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by noims · · Score: 1

      Final point: there's very little that's less funny than someone talking in technical terms about why something is funny.

      Funny you should say that <ahem>. Last night I was thinking exactly the opposite while watching Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl. The sketch where Graham Chapman is lecturing on the history of the jape is hillarious.

      I suppose it just goes to show anything can be funny

      Noims
      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world. This is just a tribute.
    79. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's simply because "zero zero zero - zero zero zero zero zero" was slower to say than "one one one - one one one one", hence the punch was funnier since he had time to try three numbers for the joke punch (instead of maybe two, if streching it).

      And also, don't forget even Stewie makes mistakes. ;-)

      My prefered scene is when he's teaching that girl to speak "english", and he goes "This is what it should sound like, and this is what you sound like", and then he uses one one of those "Moo!" cans. Hilarious, I was almost pissing in my pants. ^_^

    80. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by BLAMM! · · Score: 1

      Family Guy actually utilizes the same basic premise behind the Simpsons, and borrows quite a bit from the show:
      - a show about a family with 3 kids
      - the father is a moron
      - the wife is usually the sane/careful one
      - setting is in a fictional American town, although in Family Guy, we at least know the state (Rhode Island)
      - the children are a boy, girl, and a baby
      - the father spends a lot of time at the bar


      You just described the average american family. Perhaps *that's* what *both* shows were imitating?

    81. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      It's even more hilarious when the family Guy does have some moral at the end, because it's usually some horrible horrible thing.

      I'm specifically thinking of the time that they all move to the Deep South, and don't get along, but eventually have their life saved by the Southerners, and Peter closes the episode with the dubious moral 'I think the lesson here is, it doesn't really matter where you're from, as long as we're all the same religion.'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    82. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Spamlent+Green · · Score: 1

      I think King of the Hill is hilarious, and I've only spent a few miserable hours in Texas.

      However, I will say being from New England makes the Family Guy that much funnier (or should I say, makes it wicked funny). The vernacular and numerous cheap shots at Rhode Islanders were great.

    83. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 1

      True, but the old "someone lost an 'I'/eye at Bingo" joke doesn't seem that old.

    84. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      What epsiode was the puerto rico area code in?

    85. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrance and Phillip are the South Park of South Park. It portrays South Park as it is perceived by people who have never actually watched it, so just see it as the equivalant of a bunch of fart jokes.

    86. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by theperplepigg · · Score: 1

      The episode where the town was split into 2 area codes, Homer became mayor of New Springfield, and the Who played on a wall of garbage. The original area code was 939, the new area code was 636.

      --
      -- Every time you kill a kitten, God masturbates.
    87. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by interociter · · Score: 1

      Damn! That would have been brilliant! Scratchy keeps stepping on rakes, and the third time the tines go right through his foot. Scratchy screams, and Itchy hits him several times with a rake, ripping him to small leaf-like pieces. Then Itchy rakes all the little pieces into a pile, which he sets on fire. Finally, Itchy and his son stand back to watch the burning "leaves" in a heartwarming Norman Rockwell moment.

      --
      Interociter
      -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
    88. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by tarsus · · Score: 1

      "...setting is in a fictional American town, although in Family Guy, we at least know the state (Rhode Island)"

      and the town as well they reference numerous times per episode.

      www.planet-familyguy.com/info/quahog.asp

    89. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Final point: there's very little that's less funny than someone talking in technical terms about why something is funny.

      HAW HAW! THATZ FUNNY BECUZ THE PREZIDENT STUCK A
      CIGAR IN SUM GIRLZ COOTER!!1

    90. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Wandering+Idiot · · Score: 1

      King of the Hill is hilarious, but it's a different kind of humor than in say, the Simpsons. It's fairly deadpan, and develops from knowing the characters (and knowing people at least somewhat like them in real life- I suspect living somewhere in the South helps with this). The previous poster was correct in saying that it never breaks the rules of reality , but despite this, the Halloween episode where Luanne was engaged to the pork king is one of the most bizarre things I've ever seen on TV. And the two-parter where they went to Japan, Hank's father tried to assault the Emperor, and Bobby became a Dance Dance Revolution master was priceless...

    91. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by ryen · · Score: 0

      Brian is almost a knockoff of Homer Simpson.
      I've never heard that comparison. The Peter Griffin/Homer Simpson similarities are obvious tho:
      Both...
      - are.. well.. dumbasses.
      - drink heavily
      - have meaningless jobs
      - have senial fathers
      - both married to women who just seem to know more about everything.
      any other similarities are welcome!

    92. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he only looks out for himself, and ruins his kids in the process.

    93. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      that's a good point about age. For adults, it's not an issue (did anyone notice Seinfeld getting older?). I don't remember the Married ... With Children teenagers getting much older, but for a Bart or Bobby, ... they're no Gary Coleman.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    94. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Wrong again...it was a joke, as was the whole episode, that pretended the Simpsons were actors. "But don't believe me. Observe this commerical!""

      You guys fell for an interesting joke. They changed the state several times depending on when and where it was aired. I had a feeling it would spur debates like this.

  6. Woo Hoo! by dolo666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love the Family Guy! Does that make me sick?
    I feel like I just heard they brought Futurama back.
    Oh now I feel sad now...

    1. Re:Woo Hoo! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      i like it too.

      but i also like adultswim cartoons :).

      family guy is just so "didn't see that coming", and it does it well too. no rules whatsoever :)

      i'm a big fan of futurama too though...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Woo Hoo! by CoolMoDee · · Score: 1

      They are bringing futurama back. 16 new episodes are Cartoon Network :-D

      --
      Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
    3. Re:Woo Hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Barney (Rubble) was the idiot.

    4. Re:Woo Hoo! by CrowScape · · Score: 2, Informative

      But they aren't "new" new episodes, they are episodes that are new to Cartoon Network.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    5. Re:Woo Hoo! by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1

      I realize that this may be considered heresy on slashdot (hence the fact that I'm posting anonymous), but I honestly HATED...

      [shrug] There's one in every crowd. :-P

    6. Re:Woo Hoo! by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      they aren't "new" new episodes

      I disagree. From the article

      "20th Century Fox is considering a plan to resume production of Family Guy"

      but it also adds

      "Fox Television Entertainment Group chairman Sandy Grushow said a decision is expected soon"

      so it doesn't appear final.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    7. Re:Woo Hoo! by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      bah! a dope is me. reading at +3 I didn't see post you were actually replying to. To me it looked as though you were saying the Family Guy episodes weren't "new" new.

      Sorry, Sorry, I'll get back in my cage now.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
  7. Yay by iammaxus · · Score: 1

    finally they have responded to user demand. This is a great show and I'm glad to see it might just be coming back.

  8. Pick a day, any day... by ericspinder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love that show, I saw every epoisode on Fox that I could catch, and I watch ever one that I can on adult swim. As I remember it fox keep moving the show from night to night. Sometimes showing it sometimes not, it really didn't make a log of sense. It was one of those shows that you couldn't depend it being on. I am glad that Fox is reconsidering.

    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    1. Re:Pick a day, any day... by Doomstalk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fox loves to do this. Especially with shows they air around the same time as The Simpsons, which is by far their most popular show. They like to use those slots to show off whatever new series they feel like hawking that week, causing the musical slots effect you're talking about. That and football games that go into overtime generally mean the kiss of death for whatever show is unlucky enough to be there. The sad part is that they kill great shows to promote ones with far less lasting power.

    2. Re:Pick a day, any day... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100%. It's the only reason I stopped watching it. It was too hard to keep up with. I don't have TiVo but I'm sure the TiVo CPU would have melted trying to keep up with the Family Guy viewing times.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Pick a day, any day... by xalres · · Score: 5, Informative

      From what I heard from when Seth Green was on Love Line. It was a huge fan success with a fanatical following but there was one guy way way WAY up the ladder at Fox that just didn't get the show and didn't like it. He made the decision to switch the times around and drop airings from the schedule at random (a surefire way to get a ratings drop if you want a show pulled).

      How do you like that eh? The best show on television with a huge fanbase pulled because of one ass-hat at the top. That's Hollywood for you. But hey, at least we have gems like American Idol and Joe Millionaire (1 and 2) to fill the quality TV gap left by Family Guy. I hope that exec gets slapped and sterilized.

      --
      If whales learn how to use weapons we're all screwed!
    4. Re:Pick a day, any day... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      As I remember it fox keep moving the show from night to night. Sometimes showing it sometimes not, it really didn't make a log of sense. It was one of those shows that you couldn't depend it being on.

      Kinda like the problem with Futurama. Odd times of the year for its season, seldom shown during football season. 7:00 sunday is tough because sports always preempt it. And yes, the ratings were not there, perhaps because we never knew if it was really going to be on or not.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    5. Re:Pick a day, any day... by AugstWest · · Score: 1

      I am not clever enough for a witty sig, sorry. Also, don't spell good[well].

      Fabulous.

      Now tell the one that doesn't suck.

    6. Re:Pick a day, any day... by puck71 · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I'll have to scour my Loveline archives to see if I have that episode recorded...I seem to remember hearing about it too. It was discussed a lot since Adam is a HUGE fan of the show (as well as the voice of death in most of the episodes).

    7. Re:Pick a day, any day... by egarland · · Score: 1

      Someone, please! Every single football game runs at least 30 minues over. What braindead moron decided they should schedule 30 minutes less than the game takes and screw up every single show that comes after. Schedule it for 30 minutes more and make some filler you can show if it runs short.

      --
      set softtabstop=4 shiftwidth=4 expandtab nocp worlddomination
    8. Re:Pick a day, any day... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Yep, all those damn conservatives in hollywood mucking up the works ;-)

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    9. Re:Pick a day, any day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't the holy grail of mega-multi-channel TV meant to be that overruns on sporting events wouldn't fuck up the rest of the schedule - because they'd be on their own channel!!

      Of course this is a schedulers nightmare because the whole 'put baywatch on after the game' trick falls apart. Schedulers are bastards.

      Two shows the BBC did this to were Larry Sanders and Seinfeld. Both shown in the 'somewhere after newsnight' slot on BBC2 - effectively meaning they started anywhere between 11:30PM and 1AM. For anyone in the UK without Sky this was their only chance to see both shows.

    10. Re:Pick a day, any day... by Mawen · · Score: 1

      The sad part is that they kill great shows to promote ones with far less lasting power.

      I remember when they killed Space: Above and Beyond this way. The Chigs were right... abandon all hope [in FOX executives].

    11. Re:Pick a day, any day... by larryj · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the exact same thing happened to 'News Radio' on NBC. One exec "didn't get it" and the show got canned. Of course, it wasn't the same without Phil Hartman anyway.

      --
      What if the Hokey-Pokey really is what it's all about?
    12. Re:Pick a day, any day... by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      Seth Green - my first thought was "oh, a Greg the Bunny reference". Wow - he's been shat on twice by Fox.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    13. Re:Pick a day, any day... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I don't know how they got any ratings at all, since they didn't show it most of the time. You can't get viewership on a show if you never air it. At least Adult Swim is letting me see all of those episodes that were pre-empted or otherwise lost in the shuffle.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    14. Re:Pick a day, any day... by xalres · · Score: 1

      I miss that show! The "Aiight-blah" episode is still my favorite.

      --
      If whales learn how to use weapons we're all screwed!
    15. Re:Pick a day, any day... by Alekzander · · Score: 1

      Very true. It seemed to me as I watched the show that someone somewhere (conspiracy theorists of the world, unite!) was trying to kill the show. It was very similar to what happened to another great show, Newsradio, which moved from night to night, was sometimes on, sometimes not, until it was dead in the water. Then, like Newsradio, it developed a significant following once in syndication.

      --
      Those who would impede freedom, impede life.
    16. Re:Pick a day, any day... by xalres · · Score: 1

      It was pretty recent, no more than a few weeks ago.

      --
      If whales learn how to use weapons we're all screwed!
    17. Re:Pick a day, any day... by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      IIRC, it was Norm MacDonald in the "Death is a bitch" episode.

    18. Re:Pick a day, any day... by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      LOL. I still use the term A-i-git.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    19. Re:Pick a day, any day... by puck71 · · Score: 1

      Norm was the voice of death in the first episode he appeared in, but Adam took over after that.

  9. The question is by BizDiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what kind of "restrictions" are they gonna place on it?

    The show got cancelled more because of controversy than lack of ratings. It's good to see Fox selling out on this due to response (whoddathunkit? Fox?), but I hate for the Family Guy people to sell out too.

    In some ways it was good that it went out on top; Look at the Simpsons now; yech.

    1. Re:The question is by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >> The show got cancelled more because of
      >> controversy than lack of ratings.

      Actually according to the article it was ratings dwindling. I mean if SouthPark can air on TV, Family Guy should have nothing to worry about. This is Fox after all.

    2. Re:The question is by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      The simpsons is still pretty good... sometimes at least. That episode they sued themselves over, that one in particular was funny and edgy.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:The question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the end of its' last season, the show was averaging under 5 million viewers. Those numbers are pathetic, even for FOX.

    4. Re:The question is by kmcg83 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In some ways it was good that it went out on top; Look at the Simpsons now; yech.

      Yeah, but the Simpsons has been on for 14 seasons. And up to around 9 or 10 they were awesome. I mean, I think that the best Simpsons came around 3-4 and 8-9, so it's not like they had a really short shelf life.

      The family guy, on the other hand, was cut short when there really was no sign of it slowing down. They had only gone for a couple seasons before they were taken off the air. They might have "gone out on top", but that doesn't mean that they didn't have anywhere to go from there. And I, for one, am interested to see what else might come of this.

    5. Re:The question is by CrowScape · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except South Park is cable, Family Guy is network. There is a massive difference. Cable channels can take far greater risks as they generally cater to niche audiences. So if Comedy Central alienates the "moral majority" with an episode about a gay dog, it doesn't hurt them much because the audience that was offended probably wasn't watching Comedy Central anyway.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    6. Re:The question is by crashnbur · · Score: 1
      I always thought that the right thing to do, and the perfect way for the Simpsons to end, would be for Stewie to appear in an episode (the final episode) of the Simpsons, and he and Maggie can team up to blow up Springfield, Stewie's first step toward world domination (also revealing that Maggie's been plotting for years inspired by Bart's rebelliousness and Lisa's genius). Then I suppose as they migrate back toward Quahog, something could happen to Maggie (she gets hit by a bus, she's taken to a foster home, Stewie kills her a la "Porphyria's Lover") and in any case, the Simpsons are dead and "Family Guy" takes over the 8:00 Sunday slot.

      Okay, you can ignore the plotting part, but I thought since I first saw "Family Guy" that it should replace the Simpsons in that slot on Sunday nights, since it is essentially a modernized and funnier version of Matt Groening's overdone masterpiece.

    7. Re:The question is by Belgand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, beyond that they have different FCC limitations. For some insane reason it was ruled that the FCC can effectively censor broadcast television. Cable, however, falls outside of these bounds and thus is free to do pretty much whatever they want as far as I'm aware. I may be wrong, but there's nothing stopping a cable channel from showing hardcore fetish porn aside from sponsor and viewer complaints (guess which they care about more).

    8. Re:The question is by MrDickey · · Score: 1

      I think the fox network actually has good reason to place some restrictions on family guy. If you have seen the unaired "Wish upon a Weinstein" episode on DVD, you could see how airing that episode would get a TV network in a *lot* of trouble.

      --
      I hate my sig
    9. Re:The question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Contrary to popular belief, Family Guy was not cancelled because of controversy. If that had been the case they would have simply said "you can't do that" and there were relatively few times this happened. MacFarlane wouldn't consider doing the show if they wouldn't give him freedom to be edgy.

      As someone else mentioned, it was bad scheduling on the part of Fox that killed the show. It was shuffled to nearly every day of the week throughout its life and sometimes would be shown at a different time without warning, so viewers started disappearing.

      I fell in love with this show from the first episode, but I only saw it occasionally because I never knew if it would be on or not. I usually ended up having to check the TV listings just to find out when it would be each week.

    10. Re:The question is by cnkeller · · Score: 1
      Cable, however, falls outside of these bounds and thus is free to do pretty much whatever they want as far as I'm aware.

      I was just wondering how sure you were. I happen to watch Howard Stern on E!. Yeah, yeah, he's a loser, but at times, a funny loser. They bleep or obscure quite a bit. I always wondered why? It shouldn't the the audience or advertisers, after all what else do you expect on Stern? I just assumed they were afraid of running afoul of various FCC limitations.

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    11. Re:The question is by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Not true. The FCC regulates cable just as they regulate broadcast. They simply don't get involved until someone complains. Believe it or not, no one complained to the FCC when South Park said "shit" a hundred times.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    12. Re:The question is by ultramk · · Score: 1

      I may be wrong, but there's nothing stopping a cable channel from showing hardcore fetish porn aside from sponsor and viewer complaints (guess which they care about more).

      Please tell me more about this fascinating concept of hardcore fetish porn.

      -m

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    13. Re:The question is by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 4, Funny
      BREAKING NEWS!!!
      Guy on Slashdot proves that not everyone can come up with good plot ideas for popular television shows. Further reinforces the long-known truth that people don't have the ability to evaluate their own ideas in a reasonable manner.

      Maggie and Stewie blowing up Springfield? Yeah....

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    14. Re:The question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    15. Re:The question is by Intocabile · · Score: 1

      If you had listened to the DVD commentary you would have known that the episode was approved by two rabbis. There was nothing wrong with that episode.

    16. Re:The question is by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 2, Funny

      Marge: Homer, I don't want guns in my house! Don't
      you remember when Maggie shot Mr. Burns?
      Homer: I thought Smithers did it.
      Lisa: That would've made a lot more sense . . .

      Simpsons - 5F01

    17. Re:The question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As compared to FOX which has nice wholesome shows
      like Temptation Island, Joe Millionarie, Celebrity
      Boxing, Who Wants to Marry a Multimillionaire, etc.

      Obligitory Simpsons Quote: I can't believe FOX is now
      a hardcore porn channel. The change was so gradual I didn't
      even notice it.

    18. Re:The question is by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      What's really ironic is they ruled that you can say "fuck" as an adjective as long as you're not describing the sexual act.

      Someone (some fucking rapper I think) used the word "fucking" a couple weeks ago as an expletive to describe some award he got, and the FCC ruled that it was not a fine-able offense because it was used as an expression, which "kids use all the time these days."

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    19. Re:The question is by Bloomy · · Score: 0

      That was Bono from U2. Happened at the Golden Globes back in January. The FCC didn't announce their decision until October, though.

    20. Re:The question is by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1

      exactly. That the difference between a show like The Shield and Nip/tuck and your average Law and Order or ER clones. On a Cable network your audience is streamlined and very distinct. Networks need advertisers more so they're trying to bring in everyone. Even networks with with specific demos (WB, UPN) can't afford to pull some of the stuff that would be easy to push on FX or Spike or something...

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    21. Re:The question is by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      It's because you have to *pay* and *suscribe* to cable - broadcast is... you know... broadcasted. It's free, and anyone can pick it up.

      Same thing with the radio - can't swear on the radio, becasue it's a free, open medium, not requiring a payment (and by inference, an understanding that you may be purchasing lewd programming???). But, you can buy CD's with swearing on them (tipper gore aside).

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    22. Re:The question is by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      That's kinda interesting. The Simpsons started when Fox had little or no expectations for most of their shows ;-)

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    23. Re:The question is by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Howso? It had been my understanding that the FCC only had the right to regulate broadcast media that was actually broadcast using the airwaves. Since cable went over cable it was not subject to FCC regulation, but merely the self-regulation of being deathly afraid of offending anyone.

    24. Re:The question is by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that never made much sense to me either. Although at least watching obscured naked people is a slight increase over listening to naked people on the radio.

      Likewise the recent Joe Schmo Show on Spike TV had no end of cheap games involving nudity and at one point tried to get two of the female "contestants" to get topless for the ratings. What's the point? Knowing that someone else is getting to see someone naked? Do people prefer knowing that the nudity they desire is being kept from them? Doesn't make any bit of sense, but I suspect it's still the network's self-imposed standards and the fact that advertisers might actually pull out despite being willing to advertise as long as you're just being teased.

    25. Re:The question is by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      That would be a logical conclusion to draw, but that's not how it worked. FCC were so stringent against cable that they, at one point, were banned from airing network programing at the same time the networks were airing it. Basically the FCC got into regulating the cable industry in order to ensure the dominance of the airwaves over cable.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    26. Re:The question is by zonix · · Score: 1

      Now, I can actually imagine Tom Tucker delivering this breaking news. :-)

      Now all we need is to end it with the unforgettable: "Now back to Diane being a bitch. Diane?"

      z
      --
      What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    27. Re:The question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. It was a joke. Kudos on the comedy karma though.

    28. Re:The question is by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Hmm... so how do they regulate it exactly? I know with radio and such there is an FCC fine when you violate the established regulations. Yet, I also know that the FCC tends to only step in when there is a complaint.

      Do they merely have some sort of regulatory authority over cable, but not often exercise it or what? What about the operation of premium cable channels and their comparative lack of standards compliance (not to mention that HBO is increasingly showing that people greatly prefer not to have dumbed-down censored crap)?

      More importantly, where would one go to get further information on this subject?

      As for the FCC trying to force the dominance of broadcast... man are they fighting a losing battle. I can't believe how regressive that is. I don't think I've watched any network television other than the Simpsons in years. I mean, Family Guy and Futurama as well, but never any of this prime-time crap.

    29. Re:The question is by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      They aren't fighting that battle anymore, it's just what they did when cable companies were first coming online. The FCC regulations for content seem to have equalized across the mediums, at least in practice. I'm not quite up with current standards, only the history. But fines are SOP, and an extreme measure can be a revokation of a broadcasting license.

      For more information you can visit the FCC website (www.fcc.gov) or check out books on the history of broadcasting. Most of my knowledge is coming from the handful of college courses I've taken on the subject.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
  10. Freakin' sweet... by Miguelito · · Score: 1

    Glad to know my enjoyment of the DVD sets may have contributed to the show coming back.

    --
    - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
  11. Hmmmmm by ziggy_zero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe they could save us all a little time and release them straight to DVD instead of on TV first....If I remember correctly part of the reason they got cancelled was they gave it a shitty timeslot so nobody watched it.

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
    1. Re:Hmmmmm by dvdave · · Score: 1

      I agree. I think it was on at least three different nights, finally ending up on Thursday where it (big surprise) died. They'll probably do something similar and put it on Friday at 9pm where it will last a few weeks, being allowed low numbers because no one watches tv on Friday, and be pulled by the following sweeps period.

      I'd have thought Comedy Central (contracts aside) could have picked it up. Maybe it was budget reasons, but I see FG as a great match with South Park or most of their other 10pm shows.

    2. Re:Hmmmmm by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Futurama was(is?) treated this way too. Being ommitted, due to American Football matches, being placed in random time slots and 3 weeks ago I had King of the Hill start 10 minutes before the end of the Futuram episode!?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    3. Re:Hmmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except Futurama sucked ass and was about as funny as the Simpsons never was.

    4. Re:Hmmmmm by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly part of the reason they got cancelled was they gave it a shitty timeslot so nobody watched it.

      Even a shitty timeslot would have been better than the musical timeslot that it got.

      I think it was on, when the high tide of the Themes coincided with the low tide in Guam, except on the week of the odd numbered full moon.

      Point being, that as soon as I got used to catching it at a certain timeslot, they'd move it.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  12. Yeah baby! by FaasNat · · Score: 1, Funny

    As Quagmire would say, "Awright!"

    --
    There's never enough when you have too little
    1. Re:Yeah baby! by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

      Giggiddy Giggiddy Giggiddy....

      Quagmire Rules!

      Holy Freeking CRAP Lois!

      So does Peter Griffin!!!!

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    2. Re:Yeah baby! by osxuser-02 · · Score: 1

      Gigity, Gigity, Gigity.

      "Does this look like a Q to you?"

      moves hip

      "How 'bout now?"

      --

      I went to college for this?...

    3. Re:Yeah baby! by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 1

      A guy in several of my courses at college CONSTANTLY does that. It ceased being funny after the 100th time.

      "time to program your robot"
      "OOOHhhh RIGHT....gigity gigity gigity"

      So, now I just make fun of him, and do impressions of it all the time. Whenever he walks by, I'm like "OOOhhh Right!" and he gets all pissed off. Funny thing is, he still does it in class.

  13. Who cares...I mean yay! by xaqar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I've watched this show a few times, and I have found it absolutely unfunny. What am I missing, slashdot?

    1. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 4, Funny

      A sense of humor?

      --
      evil adrian
    2. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by CheeseMonkey · · Score: 1

      A funny bone?

      --
      Nothing to see here.
    3. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A low-brow sense of humour.

    4. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A sense of humor.

      That was too easy.

    5. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A penis.

    6. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've watched this show a few times, and I have found it absolutely unfunny. What am I missing, slashdot?

      A sense of humor

    7. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something to look at when you're talking to 'em.

    8. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by Nuge · · Score: 0

      A soul?

    9. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There, now you can say "B35+ Tr01l 3v4r!" and pretend that was your intention.

    10. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

      You, my friend are missing a dark sense of humour!

      Somewhere out there, there is a dark sense of humor that is missing it's body.

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    11. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      Misogyny.

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    12. Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by gosand · · Score: 1
      I've watched this show a few times, and I have found it absolutely unfunny. What am I missing, slashdot?

      A sense of humor?

      Nahh, I wouldn't say that. I have seen some funny parts in this show, but it just doesn't do it for me. And before you think "he doesn't get it", I do. I just don't think it is that funny or clever. Sure, I laughed a few times, but I just don't care about anything in that show. I know, it is just a cartoon, but they still have to do some kind of character development. Futurama did this from the first episode, almost in a creepy way. It was like there wasn't any "break-in" episodes, it just hit the ground running. The Simpsons has pretty much grown-up, and can still (surprisingly) make me laugh in every episode. I find that I like the re-runs of episodes better than the first time I see them, but I am not sure why.

      That is my over-analysis of The Family Guy. The simple analysis is I just don't care about it, and the humor is too straightforward. It seems like it is just a couple of one-liners that they built an episode around. Ho-hum.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  14. Can anyone tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the "banned episode" is about? too lazy to google ;-)

    1. Re:Can anyone tell me by The+Night+Watchman · · Score: 4, Informative

      what the "banned episode" is about? too lazy to google ;-)

      It's called "When You Wish Upon a Weinstein", and it's about Peter getting into financial trouble and making a wish for a Jew to come save him, because he thinks all Jewish people are financial geniuses. I thought it was relatively tame compared to some of the other things they've done, particularly the "Special People's Games" episode. In any case, the episode is available on DVD Volume 2, and it's a joy to watch.

      ---

      --
      "Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of"-TMBG
    2. Re:Can anyone tell me by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      It certainly wasn't the raciest episode ever, it just dealt with Jewish stereotypes about being good with money, smart, etc. Peter uses the word "Jew" quite a bit so that might be the reason why it ended up getting banned. In the commentary on the DVD even Seth admits he was surprised it didn't get to air.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    3. Re:Can anyone tell me by SlamMan · · Score: 0

      Yup, and since Comedy Central aired it, we should have nothing to worry about when it comes to what else they'll air. Hell, they aired the Christopher Reeves South Park episode.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    4. Re:Can anyone tell me by Doomstalk · · Score: 1

      Cartoon Network aired it, not Comedy Central.

    5. Re:Can anyone tell me by use_compress · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even when they played it on Cartoon Network, it wasn't completely uncensored. They changed Peter's line "Even though they killed my lord," to "I don't think they killed my lord."

    6. Re:Can anyone tell me by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      There's a difference - South Park "airs" on cable, while Fox will air Family Guy (and did previously) on the _actual_ "air". Broadcast TV is still subject to heavier censorship than the cable channels, each of which enforces their own version of "morality" the way they see fit, with their own code or "S&P" (Standards (hah!) and Practices).

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    7. Re:Can anyone tell me by nosredna · · Score: 1

      The Weinstein Episode is among the less offensive (at least of the actually offensive ones, since most are pretty tame by my standards) episodes they made. The worst moments (in addition to 'Ready, Willing, and Disabled' mentioned in parent) are the end of 'The Son Also Draws' (season 1), where much of the family rattles off a set of stereotypes about Indians (American), Mexicans, Swedes, and Canadians (although they disclaim all but the last one with an old NBC 'The More You Know' ad); 'Dammit Janet' (season 2) where Stewie gets naked at a daycare and climbs in with a little girl; 'And the Wiener Is' (season 3), all about Chris' massive penis. Most of the episodes are just funny, but those are offensive and funny at the same time. Maybe the censors just didn't like the depiction of Optimus Prime as a Jew.

    8. Re:Can anyone tell me by wastedimage · · Score: 1

      Its coming on CN soon..I think the ad said 20 something check your tivos

    9. Re:Can anyone tell me by sdcharle · · Score: 1

      They had a bumper after the musical number saying 'we changed a lyric', but didn't say which one. I guessed that was the one, it really wasn't hard to figure out...

    10. Re:Can anyone tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm coming to the conclusion that every group that complains about being stereo-typed has a group cult hero whose primary talent is sterotyping their own group.

      Blacks: Chris Rock, Jesse Jackson ;-)
      Jews: Woody Allen
      Rednecks: Jeff Foxworthy, King of the Hill

      etc....

      I kinda like "Tough Crowd" on Comedy Central because they get stuff back out into the open.

  15. So hands up who bought it :-) by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

    I did. Although it looks a bit odd when projected to 6' across :-)

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:So hands up who bought it :-) by Kentamanos · · Score: 1

      I bought Seasons 1-2, and Season 3.

      Damn funny show

    2. Re:So hands up who bought it :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I guess you should go and buy a proper projector and a good line doubler.

  16. There is a Santy Claus by Alric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a proud owner of both volumes, I can say, "FINALLY!" In my opinion, Family Guy is one of the smartest, most subtle shows ever on Television.

    Maybe the audience over the commercial sponsors for once. That would be awesome.

    1. Re:There is a Santy Claus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not quite, Farscape is coming back...

      http://www.watchfarscape.com/news/article.php?ne ws id=463

      I'm a big fan of Family Guy and Futurama as well and would be happy if both came back, but Farscape is better than both (its the only tv show I have every episode on DVD || divx (some DVD's havn't been released yet))

    2. Re:There is a Santy Claus by arthurs_sidekick · · Score: 1

      Subtle? Is this the same show where Peter turns to Brian (the dog) in a bar and says, "Wait a minute! You can talk?" followed by a good ten-second no-action whatsoever pause? /me damns Tommy Tutone.

      --
      "Oh, I hope he doesn't give us halyatchkies," said Heinrich.
    3. Re:There is a Santy Claus by smart.id · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree with you that Family Guy is one of the smartest shows on television, but it is in no way subtle. Do you call the Kool-Aid Guy busting through a wall and yelling "OH YEAH!" subtle?

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
    4. Re:There is a Santy Claus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, that's one incident in one episode. Your point ?

    5. Re:There is a Santy Claus by mekkab · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you call the Kool-Aid Guy busting through a wall and yelling "OH YEAH!" subtle?


      Yes.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    6. Re:There is a Santy Claus by BoogieGod · · Score: 1

      Nope, that wasn't subtle. And for the record, neither was this. But when you have devotion like this, you have to know you're doing something right.

    7. Re:There is a Santy Claus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, come on. You're posting on a board where some gimp claimed the cross and angel wings on Neo as he died was 'subtle religious imagery'.

      Too many people just don't know what subtle actually means, so they use it as a synonym for 'good'.

      (P.S: I love Family Guy more than any other cartoon, but it's not subtle by any means)

    8. Re:There is a Santy Claus by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      Being English, I didn't get this reference at all.
      And I thought the Kool-Aid Guy might have been Jim Jones ;)

    9. Re:There is a Santy Claus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough*

      The thing that made Family Guy great was its very unsubtlety. Here we had a show that actually made a few unapologetic observations.

      Take your uneducated English verbiage and piss on the wall elsewhere.

    10. Re:There is a Santy Claus by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      I agree with you that Family Guy is one of the smartest shows on television, but it is in no way subtle. Do you call the Kool-Aid Guy busting through a wall and yelling "OH YEAH!" subtle?
      Let alone the best Family Guy line _ever_: Chris (to twinkie) "I'm gonna turn you into poo!"
      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    11. Re:There is a Santy Claus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Being English, I didn't get this reference at all.

      Ok. There's these Kook-Aid TV ads where the Kool-Aid guy always says "Oh yeah".

      In the episode, everybody was going "Oh no!", "Oh no!" and so forth - cut to the Kool-Aid man going through the wall and yelling "Oh Yeah!" like in his ads.

      That's not much of a joke, but the "Oh No!" vs "Oh Yeah!" and the complete disconnection between people hearing a verdict and a Kool-Aid ad was enough to make me laugh out loud (and the way he backed off through the wall again, all surprised that nobody went "Oh Yeah!" with him). ^_^

    12. Re:There is a Santy Claus by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      Let alone the best Family Guy line _ever_: Chris (to twinkie) "I'm gonna turn you into poo!"

      Chris: Hey Meg, guess what word I'm thinking of now, and it's definitely NOT "kitties".
      Meg: It's kitties.
      Chris: GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!!

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    13. Re:There is a Santy Claus by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      Neo died?

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    14. Re:There is a Santy Claus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sorry to spring that one on you, but it's much better that you find out this way rather than squirm and writhe your way through 2 godawful hours (and you get to stay $10 richer, too).

    15. Re:There is a Santy Claus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, I know, you're a feminist, and I think that's adorable, but this is grown-up time, and I'M THE MAN.

      Random Guy: Whaddya say to a few drinks at the bar?
      Other Random Guy: I'd say Sharon's gonna have another black eye to explain to the neighbours!

      Or Bill Gates using his Windows-logo flashlight to call a helicopter to come pick him up...

  17. Ahem. by Mukaikubo · · Score: 1

    Dear Diary: It's my birthday!

    Seriously, with Farscape's return and this, all on the same day... wow. Just wow. A day I hope to remember for months.

    1. Re:Ahem. by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      Captain's log, stardate November 18th... point two. I may have failed to uphold Brannigan's Law, but I did make it with a hot alien babe and did buy the Family Guy DVD... and isn't that what Mankind has dreamt of ever since they first looked up at the stars?

      o_0

      Kif, I am asking you a question, dammit.

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  18. Blah, bring back Futurama by kaltkalt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Futurama was smarter, funnier, and provided lots of could-be "prior art" for future patent lawsuit defenses.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    1. Re:Blah, bring back Futurama by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

      Futurama was also ten times as expensive, whereas Family Guy is probably just about within Cartoon Networks budget, now the Adult Swim is a proven success.

  19. Wow, back on Fox? by trp642 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I figured they'd end up on UPN with Buffy and the gang...

    Chris Griffin: Where do you think you go when you die?
    Southern boy: I learned from church that if you're good you go to heaven but if you're bad, you go to a place where the dead believe they're still living and they pray for death but death won't come.
    Chris Griffin: UPN?

    1. Re:Wow, back on Fox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure it was a Southern boy? :)

  20. stewie for president !! by mAIsE · · Score: 0

    "nothing says obey me like a bloody head on a post !!"

  21. What is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a flying fuck? Since when did Slashdot become "TV Guide"?

    Honestly!

    It's not like the show is has anything to do with technology or anything that would interest nerds. Good god.

    Plus it sucks.

    1. Re:What is this shit? by mrshowtime · · Score: 1

      Family guy has more nerd references per square inch than ANY other show ever on t.v. ! It even beats out the simpsons!

      --
      "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    2. Re:What is this shit? by The+Night+Watchman · · Score: 1

      I'd say the Family Guy fanbase consists of enough of a geek demographic as to make it worth mentioning.

      --
      "Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of"-TMBG
    3. Re:What is this shit? by BW_Nuprin · · Score: 1

      Nerds love TV! What kind of nerd doesn't like TV, especially while programming? In fact... I doubt this AC is a nerd at all! And besides, kinda blatent flamebait isn't it?

    4. Re:What is this shit? by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      No, that distinction goes to Futurama, which has jokes that require you to have a basic understanding of quantum mechanics. Family Guy is up there, though.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    5. Re:What is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually like to keep the TV off while coding. Though, later when I'm lounging in front of the TV, I think about programming ideas.

  22. FireFly by michrech · · Score: 1

    The next show Fox needs to bring back is FireFly. I loved that show..

    Especially, that one time, where the captain was standing over this evil killer guy, and he was like "If I let you go, you half to leave me alone, and the evil guy was like "I'll hunt you with my last breath", and the captain guy kicked him and he flew back into this, like, jet intake on his space craft and got all killed.

    Yea. That was awesome!

    (Seriously, I really did like that show.. =])

    --
    bork bork bork!
    1. Re:FireFly by guidryp · · Score: 1

      Honestly I loved that scene. Much like Han solo blasting greedo. Lets you know how smugglers stay alive (by not being stupid). But didn't like Firefly. I watch almost any sci-fi and was a buffy fan so I had hopes Joss would pull a winner here, but I just couldn't get into the whole western thing.

    2. Re:FireFly by MysticGlyph · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was the scene that made me want to watch Firefly every friday night. When he kicked him into the engine I stood up laughing and telling my wife this is the best friggin sci-fi show on tv! I have a buddy in the special effects industry who actually worked on effects shots for Firefly. He's not allowed to say anything but from subtle hints I garnered that Firefly probably ain't dead, which leads me to believe that either SciFi channel will be picking it up, or at the verry least a DVD with unreleased episodes (maybe even an entire unseen season)! is in the works ...Keeping my fingers crossed ...jeez I loved that show.

      --
      Try my new smokable Sig, ...Sig-erette.
    3. Re:FireFly by JDevers · · Score: 1

      There were three (maybe four??) unreleased episodes that were "released" unto the web a few months after cancellation. They were obviously VHS rips, but the quality was OK. I'm sure you could still find copies on Ed2k as I doubt they will ever be released unfortunately...

    4. Re:FireFly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Much like Han solo blasting greedo

      Don't tell me you've never seen the edition where Greedo shoots first!!!

    5. Re:FireFly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      All the episodes of Firefly, including the unaired ones and a slew of extras will be on the upcoming DVD release, Dec. 12th. And..they're filming a movie. Filming starts in Australia around Easter with a tentative release of fall 2004. I agree it was the best television I've seen in years, and that's from someone who quit watching TV five years ago. I just happened to check out Firefly via download due to a post here.

    6. Re:FireFly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The three unaired episodes will be airing here in Canada on Space starting Nov. 24

      There is also supposed to be a DVD set out will all the episodes (including the unaired ones). I think it's supposed to be out by Christmas.

    7. Re:FireFly by tb3 · · Score: 1

      Those eps start airing on Space Channel in Canada in a week or two. Even at its lamest, Space kicks SciFi channel's ass.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    8. Re:FireFly by JDevers · · Score: 1

      From everything I've heard, I'll have to agree.

      SciFi was really crappy at first, hit its stride a few years later and then outright died a few years after that. I almost never watch it now...

    9. Re:FireFly by goat_of_wisdom · · Score: 1

      I'm going to buy it the day it goes on sale. Maybe if enough of us buy the Firefly DVDs they'll bring that back, too.

    10. Re:FireFly by MysticGlyph · · Score: 1

      But I'm telling you that there is a very good chance that they will be released. My friend could'nt just come out and say he was working on new episodes as he is bound by a non-disclosure agreement, but he eluded to the fact that IF he was working on fresh effects shots for Firefly that they MIGHT be released on Sci-fi channel or as a collection to be released on DVD. All I know for a FACT is that some kind of new life is in the works for the show.

      --
      Try my new smokable Sig, ...Sig-erette.
  23. bogus nielsen ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just proves that the Nielsen's rating system is bogus and flawed

    1. Re:bogus nielsen ratings by Vrallis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That reminds me....I have my Nielsen rating 'diary' due back to them this week. Time to go hunting through the TV guide for all the stuff I like, but haven't watched recently (Futurama and Family Guy, for example...I have all the DVDs anyway, and VCDs for the stuff that hasn't been released yet)

      First Farscape, now Family Guy...Now I just need to hear about Futurama returning, and I'll be set!

  24. Do I care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Stuff that matters?"

    What, pray, is this crap doing on the front page of Slashdot?

    1. Re:Do I care? by mek2600 · · Score: 1

      Look at the replies this story is getting on slashdot. That might help you realize that Family Guy really is "stuff that matters".

      You think most people give a fuck about SCO anymore?

  25. FOX = morons by glassesmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How annoying, first they cancel the show despite the LARGEST viewer response of any cancelled program. Then they leave it cancelled just long enough so it will suck by the time they put it back on the air. And then they claim it was a "late-bloomer". Fact is they realized they fsck'd up when they looked at the DVD sales and some exec wanted an explaination.

    Fox Television Entertainment Group chairman Sandy Grushow said a decision is expected soon and called the series a late-blooming phenomenon that may have aired before its time.
    1. Re:FOX = morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Firefly, right?

    2. Re:FOX = morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what you get when the pres of FOX is a woman.....

    3. Re:FOX = morons by bconway · · Score: 1

      The Firefly first season boxed set is due out December 9th. If you want Fox to listen, speak with your wallet. Clearly, it works.

      --
      Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    4. Re:FOX = morons by rlthomps-1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fox Television Entertainment Group chairman Sandy Grushow said a decision is expected soon...

      In english, "we really screwed the pooch on this one and are currently kissing seth MacFarland's ass to try to get him to come back to do more episodes. If he says yes, then we'll shove them out the door as soon as possible"

      I wish they would add "market droid" to the google translation service.

    5. Re:FOX = morons by oiper · · Score: 1

      Just a here here! to FOX = morons. "Late-bloomer".... Some people have to have money FORCED AT THEM, and they'll whine all the way to the bank.

      --
      What do I have to do to get a sig around here?! www.bearscanfly.org
    6. Re:FOX = morons by isolenz · · Score: 1

      Seth McFarland is still employed by fox, actually, there was very good suspition that a new show that he was creating (American dad, do a google search for it) was going to air as early as sept. of next year, although with all this happening now, I wouldn't be suprised to see American dad get dropped in turn of family guy getting picked back up.

    7. Re:FOX = morons by mek2600 · · Score: 1

      I think Fox was really the late bloomer. The fact that they're fixing their problem (of canceling FG in the first place) shows they have some sense in them.

      I think the hamster just fell off the wheel. Now that it's back on they seem to be fixing their mistakes.

    8. Re:FOX = morons by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way, Refs and network execs have always been in the same category. Once the call is made, there is no going back.

      I think there are serious and profound problems with the nielson rating system that keeps suckie programs on TV and under-rates excellent programs. I don't know if their sample is too small or too dumb.

      Despite the Orwellian overtones, I think the Cable Guides could provide a larger and more accurate sample of what people are watching. Take $5/month off the bill and they will track your viewing habits on digital cable box. You get to help decide what stays on and what doesn't.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    9. Re:FOX = morons by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1

      Actually, they were just waiting around, trying to make Brian, the talking dog, "more proactive" and more like "the original dog from hell". And of course firing any writers that questioned them in the process...

    10. Re:FOX = morons by Suiren · · Score: 1

      I can't believe they called it a "late-bloomer"! That show was always the best. I think it's almost as good as the Simpsons (not much can beat the Simpsons). And yes they did take it off the air but at least they put it on Cartoon Network. We weren't completely deprived.

  26. all i can say is by lrdviperscorpian · · Score: 1

    Allllll Riiiight !!!!

  27. Great... by gooman · · Score: 1

    Now bring back Futurama and all will be forgiven.
    In the meantime, thank goodness for Cartoon Network and DVD's.

    --
    "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
  28. Ha ha ha by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    I love that show, it makes me laugh.
    Aaaaa ha ha ha...ha ha ha...ha ha ha...ha ha ha...ha ha ha...Ha ha ha ...ha ha ha...ha ha ha...ha ha ha..ha ha ha..Ha ha ha ...ha ha ha...ha ha ha...ha ha ha..ha ha...ah

  29. That's great by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    But what about Futurama?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  30. Best news... by miketang16 · · Score: 1

    This is the best news I've seen on Slashdot in a looong time. Now, if we can just bring back Futurama as well.

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
    1. Re:Best news... by vex24 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Ah, I finally scrolled down far enough to find the comment I was going to write.

      So how long will Katey Sagal's series last without John Ritter? Like 5 more episodes? Futurama has untapped potential, and is targetted at the right market; young male geeks with too much disposable income.

      --

      People shape laws. Not the other way around.

  31. KROQ by blackmonday · · Score: 1

    Here in LA Kevin and Bean, the morning guys on KROQ radio pretty much saved the show TWICE. Listeners rallied around the show and good things happened. Unfortunately, they cancelled it anyway. It's good to see it may be coming back.

    My favorite episode is where the dad gets cash for "slavery reparations", and the brother spends the money to make his house look like Pee Wee's Playhouse, complete with Chairy and Globe-y.

    1. Re:KROQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how does a shitty radio station 'save' a TV show, twice no less?

      You fucking suck at the internet.

  32. Funny, I was thinking by vslashg · · Score: 1

    Sweet! Eheheheheheheheh!

  33. A Dead Lois? by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1

    Blast! Damn you, woman!

  34. Highly Uneven Re:Who cares...I mean yay! by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    I can believe that. There were a lot of duds.

    But give it a chance. Once in a while there's a brilliant episode. Like the one that ends with Brian and a dying elderly friend experiencing a speeded-up virtual-reality life together. Weird, SF-ish, and oddly touching.

  35. bout time!!! by aberant · · Score: 1

    as Quagmire would say... giggadee giggadee...gig-gah-deeee!!!

    1. Re:bout time!!! by (startx) · · Score: 1

      heh, oh yeeeeaah!

    2. Re:bout time!!! by karnal · · Score: 1

      awwwwl-riiight!

      "Does this look like a Q to you?"

      --
      Karnal
  36. Bring back Futurama, you cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and Cow and Chicken.

    1. Re:Bring back Futurama, you cunts by jrf83317 · · Score: 1

      Cow and Chicken WAS GREAT!!!!

  37. Best news I've heard all week... by danielrm26 · · Score: 1

    The baby with the English accent is pure comic genius; the way they combine the mature cynic and infant mentality is utterly amazing. I just don't see anything (even Simpsons or Futurama) that compares with the high points on that show.

    I am particularly fond of the scene where he tells Peter to excuse him so he can go find something to strike him with. Classic.

    --
    dmiessler.com -- grep understanding knowledge
  38. EXACTLY. Fox mismanaged those shows... by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 1

    they kept switching the night, and wondered why people didn't watch it. And they put Futurama on at 7 on Sundays, and then ran football late without showing a re run!
    I really liked Family Guy, and it made me laugh more than anything but, Futurama is the show I will miss the most. It was really shaping up to be excellent.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
  39. Some Sanity FINALLY! by mrshowtime · · Score: 0, Troll

    I hated Family Guy when it first came out. I thought it was a Simpsons rip off, which is the farthest thing from the truth. Family Guy is one of the best written shows EVER. The only thing that comes close is the first 6 seasons of the Simpsons. People who hate Family Guy need to watch ALL of the episodes. Family Guy's humor takes a while to get used to, but once you do, there is no going back. Futurama fans are going to be pist off if FG returns, but too bad. Family Guy should have not been cancelled in the first place. If it returns, it will be the first show to return after two cancellations. Family guy was hobbled by poor scheduling (it was up against fucking friends and Survivor!) If it returns, it needs to be put on AFTER the simpsons. After one season it will become painfully apparent who is the (now) better show and may finally lay the simpsons down to it's well deserved eternal slumber.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  40. Why Family Guy? by OECD · · Score: 0

    OK, I get Harry Potter. I get The Simpsons. But why do geeks love Family Guy? Is it a Stewie thing?

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    1. Re:Why Family Guy? by Mikeytsi · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh, I don't know,... Maybe because it's FUNNY?

      --
      I've been called a "Fucking Dick" by better people than you.
    2. Re:Why Family Guy? by nacturation · · Score: 1, Insightful

      OK, I get Harry Potter. I get The Simpsons. But why do geeks love Family Guy? Is it a Stewie thing?
      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.


      Yes, I quoted your sig. But that's the exact reason. For most people (and likely Fox execs) The Family Guy is pure flamebait. Ever see that episode with the "Diamonds are forever" commercial? 'Nuff said! However, if you're not an overly sensitive person, most of the humor there is a veritable goldmine! Others have said it, but it's worth repeating that TFG has at least triple the wit of any other show packed into its 22 minutes, and I'm being conservative.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:Why Family Guy? by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Let me try present this little equation for you:
      Family Guy == (The Simpsons)^2
      Family Guy is an outrageously funny and fairly original show. It achieves a near-perfect blend of "stupid" humor, "intelligent" humor, and "wacky" humor. It's one of the few shows that is truly LOL funny. It is slightly "controversial" at times, but not so blatantly insulting as South Park. Also, it does incorporate a *lot* of pop/sub-culture and geek humor.
    4. Re:Why Family Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bad equation, 0^2 is equal to family guy, which clearly this is not.
      the simpsons were good 12 years ago, they were ok 10 years ago, they were getting old 8 years ago. they completely suck now.
      family guy is muuuuch more entertaining :)
      the simpsons nowadays just insults your intelligence. the episodes are just so insane because of how freaking LONG its been running for...

    5. Re:Why Family Guy? by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Speaking of overly sensitive, my favorite Family Guy quote is
      "Why, that's outragous! I've got to do something!"
      "There's nothing you CAN do"
      "Well, I guess I'll just have to develop a sense of humor, then"

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    6. Re:Why Family Guy? by Teknogeek · · Score: 1

      Any prime-time show that manages to incorporate an Oscar Wilde reference is worth keeping.

      "How shall I put this...in an attic somewhere, there's a portrait of you getting prettier."

      --
      I mod down anyone who uses M$ in their posts. I like to live on the edge.
    7. Re:Why Family Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My philosphy is that everytime I mention something like "The Simpsons," I am always refering to the high-point of the series. Same with musicians and actors/actresses.

      Like if I said "Marilyn Monroe is hot," you should infer that I meant Ms. Monroe in her prime, not her current dried-out and decayed corpse.

    8. Re:Why Family Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I get Harry Potter. I get The Simpsons. But why do geeks love Family Guy? Is it a Stewie thing?

      Perhaps the fact that you "get Harry Potter".
      Disqualifies you from GETTING Family Guy.

      Grow up, and break the shackles.

    9. Re:Why Family Guy? by Kentamanos · · Score: 1

      I posted this in another thread, but maybe you'll like this equation better:

      Last X episodes of Family Guy > Last X episodes of The Simpsons

      Where X = Number of Family Guy episodes

    10. Re:Why Family Guy? by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Actually the diamonds parody ad was around on the internet. I'm told by friends that it pre-dates Family Guy, but I'm not certain. Anyhow, the Family Guy version was much, much better simply because it was far classier and well... it had sound and motion.

    11. Re:Why Family Guy? by Durandal64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The one failing of the show, I think, is that sometimes they just can't let go of a joke. I remember the sequence when Peter go into a brawl with a giant chicken ... it went on for a good 3-5 minutes. That's entirely too long for a simple humorous interlude. There was also the letter that Stewie wrote Brian after he'd left for England to live on the set of that English show. It took over a minute to read the thing, and it just lost its humor after 15 seconds anyway. There are tons of other examples of what should be small interludes being dragged out to fill 30 seconds or more throughout the series, but the rest of the show is hilarious enough to make up for it. Whenever God makes an appearance, it's always funny.

      MEG: I wish God would just kill me now!
      [Camera goes to Heaven, with God pointing a sniper rifle at Meg's head. Then a phone rings.]
      GOD: Hello? ... Kaaaaaaaren!

    12. Re:Why Family Guy? by ditto999999999999999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My GOD!!! That chicken sketch was the most action packed cartoon scene I have ever seen. Right near the end when Peter says, "Chicken, gave me a bad coupon...", and it starts up again... Just thinking about that makes me laugh but I digress. I think that is one of Family Guys strengths. They keep going with stuff, and it really has an effect on me.

      Ditto

    13. Re:Why Family Guy? by agallagh42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know it doesn't follow the theme of this thread, but my favourite quote is one of Stewie's:

      "Now make yourself useful and wipe my butt. Circular motion, one finger, and DON'T YOU LOOK AT ME!!!"

      :)

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    14. Re:Why Family Guy? by DJTodd242 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find it interesting that in the Simpsons DVD commentaries, (I beleive it was) Al Jean took a number of shots at Family Guy for ripping off thier style of nonsensical cut aways. After hearing that I went back to re-watch a few FG's and man he was right. Good show, but in retrospect somewhat derivative.

    15. Re:Why Family Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y2K? Are you selling chicken or sex jelly?

    16. Re:Why Family Guy? by pediddle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... or when Peter banged his shin and sat for a good thirty seconds going "ssstt, aaahhhh, ssstt, aaahhhh". Except, I disagree with you -- moments like that are hilarious! It just shows how much balls the producers had that they would allow 30 seconds of what was essentially dead air.

    17. Re:Why Family Guy? by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 2, Funny
      I mod down anyone who uses M$ in their posts. I like to live on the edge.

      So you'd mod yourself down if only you could moderate discussions to which you've posted?

    18. Re:Why Family Guy? by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      Simple. Deep down, all us geeks are misogynistic, alcoholic dogs.

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    19. Re:Why Family Guy? by eatdave13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dude, that was an awesome scene. The fact that it was so obviously just to take up time made it twice as funny.

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    20. Re:Why Family Guy? by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      Couldn't have said it better myself.

      Sorry, but a welfare mom's values just aren't something I'm interested in analyzing or absorbing.

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    21. Re:Why Family Guy? by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Dude! What about the raccoon in the Deep South episode?

      I thought they had killed it, and then they brought it back and it was brilliant!

      Overusing a joke = bad.

      Overusing a joke, understanding that it was over used, and using it one more time = funny.

      ~Wx

      --
      sig?
    22. Re:Why Family Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The diamond one was a classic.

      My favorite one and one I thought was gonna get them in trouble was the one with a jew and palestinian with identical features except for the funny head gears and the guy says that he cant tell them apart, that they look the same to him!
      I was stunned they were still on the air next week!

      >TFG has at least triple the wit of any other >show packed into its 22 minutes, and I'm being >conservative.

      And those capsules or flashbacks they did really helped pack it in. You know how you watch a Simpsons and the first ten minutes usually never have anything to do with the last 10 and how its hard for them to 'turn on a dime' with their storylines?
      Family Guy could just skip any time consuming segue with a sidebar joke when htey felt like it and then continue the storyline as if nothing happened.
      You can have a linear storyline but pepper it with
      jokes which didnt interfere with it or even have anything in common with it.

      Its not like they had to write anything much to lead into or out of the diamond comercial.

      So it definitely is the writing but the way the show was set-up, you could fit in a lot more jokes that didnt need a build up. That I believe made it that in the 20mins they could

      zeke

    23. Re:Why Family Guy? by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Uhh... like the Simpsons weren't somehow derivative of half a billion different movies, TV shows, and musical groups. Derivative because of nonsensical interludes? Hello! Monty Python, anyone?

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    24. Re:Why Family Guy? by DaAdder · · Score: 1

      Actually I find this something that the Family Guy people has understood completely and manages to pull off extremely well.

      At first these interludes seem on the bizarre side but the more 'FG' you consume, the better these little side activities become.

      The racoon from the deep south episode is mentioned in a nother post and is a very good example of this.

      Family Guy is hands down the funnies cartoon ever produced. Bar none.

      Peace :)

    25. Re:Why Family Guy? by arevos · · Score: 1

      So, you haven't read it?

    26. Re:Why Family Guy? by Excen · · Score: 1

      ...it went on for a good 3-5 minutes. That's entirely too long for a simple humorous interlude.

      Not for the target demographic of the show, and not for the people who were stoned watching that scene. Not to say that I know from experience, but. . .

      --
      "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    27. Re:Why Family Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, When you wish upon a Winstein was never aired, as it was "offensive" to Catholics. After seeing it on the Session 2 DVD, I don't know what the fuss was. Then again, I am neither Jewish or Catholic, so maybe it's something I missed.

    28. Re:Why Family Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the first book while I was waiting for a flight. Utter pap. I had the second book with me; it is still on my bookshelf in fact. I havn't read it as I can think of a thousand or so other books that I'd rather read instead.

    29. Re:Why Family Guy? by splatter · · Score: 1

      Plus it was just so real. Anyone that as a kid or adult has banged their shin on something has had that same experience.
      Thats what made it funny to me.

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
    30. Re:Why Family Guy? by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      It just shows how much balls the producers had that they would allow 30 seconds of what was essentially dead air.

      Sideshow Bob. Rake Scene.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    31. Re:Why Family Guy? by Cunk · · Score: 1

      That style has been adopted by a host of shows. The Critic, Malcolm in the Middle, Scrubs, and probably plenty of others that I haven't seen (what's the one with the skinny lawyer chick?).

      Maybe it's derivative but it's funny and it works. The Simpsons started it but now the masses have it.

      --

      I am the inventor of the hilarious refrigerator alarm.
    32. Re:Why Family Guy? by arevos · · Score: 1

      I liked it :)

  41. The ANSWER is... by StandardCell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (from the USA Today article) "...new episodes could end up going directly to Cartoon Network."

    That would solve the controversy problem since Cartoon Network is a cable channel.

    1. Re:The ANSWER is... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      not so sure about that. i haven't really seen anything controversial on cartoon network.

      correct me if i'm wrong, but even the adult swim seems very mild compared to most of the anime one can get at the video store.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    2. Re:The ANSWER is... by nullard · · Score: 1

      There are three shows that I watch on TV: The Family Guy, The Simpsons, and Futurama. Is there an "Adult Swim Only" cable package? Hell, that's the only time I'm ever near a TV anyway.

      --


      t'nera semordnilap
    3. Re:The ANSWER is... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      They don't show crazy extreme animation (either sexual or violent) because it doesn't appeal to a mainstream audience. They clearly show a screen before every Adult Swim episode saying that the shows are meant for children 14 and up. I'm sure they have some guidelines, but being cable they have more freedom than a big network. This week on Family Guy there's a scene where Peter and Louis are having a romantic dinner at home. Louis says "Peter, I'm not wearing any panties". He replies "It's ok, we can throw that chair out." Funny stuff and certainly adult humor, but not graphic enough to get many complaints.

      -B

    4. Re:The ANSWER is... by pla · · Score: 1

      correct me if i'm wrong, but even the adult swim seems very mild compared to most of the anime one can get at the video store.

      Sure, if you mean H like La Blue Girl, or violence like Fist of the North Star... But compared to standard broadcast TV? Or more relevantly, compared to the standard American cartoon drivel with singing and dancing mice and happy bunnies and themes that even an 8YO finds below their level?

      Broadcast stations like FOX need to worry about the FCC spanking them. Cable channels only need to worry about going too far in the direction of tastelessness such that it offends their audience. Comedy Central appears to have realized that "too far" doesn't exist, and Cartoon Network has, to its credit, at least distinguished itself in focusing on adult-oriented cartoons (and at least for Adult Swim, they seem to limit the censorship to a tolerable level).

    5. Re:The ANSWER is... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      i agree that crazy extreme animation would not get them the viewership they need, but the original poster stated that since they are on a cable chanel they might get away with more.

      the line that you mention, while being very funny, doesn't seem like it couldn't have been said in an episode of "friends". (i apologize in advance for relating the two:)

      i understand there are issues such as censorship and general aversion to cartoon sex acts, but it would be nice of cartoon network to break out of the mold and show some feature length anime (once a week, let's say) during adult swim. (stuff like metropolis, or jin-roh the wolf brigade)

      that way they could be taking advantage of their cable chanel status and bring something somewhat controversial on air.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    6. Re:The ANSWER is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jin-Roh SUCKS.

    7. Re:The ANSWER is... by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      So I guess you missed FLCL ;)

    8. Re:The ANSWER is... by hibiki_r · · Score: 1
      It's worse that being mild: They typically censor many of their anime series for violence, sex and random gore. For example, in 'Knights of the Zodiac', their censored version of Saint Seiya, They go as far as butchering dialogue to make the series more acceptable for the 'American Public'. 'He's dying' becomes 'He's losing his powers', blood is changed from red to brown/green, etc. Even Futurama is censored somwhat: it seems that 'sweet zombie Jesus' is too offensive for them.

      A few weeks ago CN aired a Family guy episode that supposedly was not allowed on TV by Fox, but I still wouldn't keep my hopes up for uncensored, original content.

    9. Re:The ANSWER is... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That would solve the controversy problem since Cartoon Network is a cable channel

      They are a cable channel that cuts the Professor on Futurama when he says "sweet zombie Jesus", at a time that is supposed to be only adults watching. I wouldn't look to them for controversial programming.

    10. Re:The ANSWER is... by tipsymonkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They are a cable channel that cuts the Professor on Futurama when he says "sweet zombie Jesus", at a time that is supposed to be only adults watching. I wouldn't look to them for controversial programming. They also cut out the "although they killed our Lord" from the Wish Upon a Weinstein episode. And the Osama Bin Laden references are cut of adult swim and the dvd.

    11. Re:The ANSWER is... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      i agree with you. i am yet to see anything controversial on cartoon network that couldn't be shown on broadcast tv.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    12. Re:The ANSWER is... by rnelsonee · · Score: 1
      This is true. Since they are currently on after 11:00, they get away with a lot. The only edit I've found is when they recently showed the "banned" [from FOX] episode where Peter looks for a Jewish person to become his accountant. The only edit is the end of a song, where Peter says in a song "even though they killed my lord" to "I don't think they killed my lord" -- and Cartoon Network even informed viewers that they changed the lyrical content.

      Even though FG might show at 9:00 on Cartoon Network, I'm sure MacFarlane will have as much, if not more, license than before. Very good news for us fans :)

    13. Re:The ANSWER is... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      They typically censor many of their anime series for violence, sex and random gore. For example, in 'Knights of the Zodiac', their censored version of Saint Seiya, They go as far as butchering dialogue to make the series more acceptable for the 'American Public'

      I guess that's what the DVD's are for. At this stage in the game, i'd just be glad anime and other adult cartoons are actually being shown regularly on a national mainstream cable channel.

      However bad it may have been in the past, it's getting better, though. In (for example) the later episodes of Dragonball Z on CN, I recall seeing red blood, and "die", "death", "kill", etc. many a time- and this on a show that's marketed to hell and back for teens and preteens.

      It should be noted, too, that the actual translation and dubbing is not done by CN, but rather by an outside studio- like Funimation, Ocean, ZRO Limit, etc.

      but I still wouldn't keep my hopes up for uncensored, original content.

      Just for the record, CN aired all of Gundam Wing uncut about 3 or 4 years ago, in part of the same time slot that Adult Swim currently occupies.

    14. Re:The ANSWER is... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      Showing feature length movies would be awesome. The problem is that movies take up a big chunk of air time. They would have to give the movies crappy spots or bump a lot of high rated shows. I would love for them to show movies from 4 to 7am and advertise that you should Tivo it.

      -B

    15. Re:The ANSWER is... by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      (and at least for Adult Swim, they seem to limit the censorship to a tolerable level).

      Good news, everyone. They bleep out the "Jesus" in "Sweet Zombie Jesus". Oh, wait. Those aren't good news at all. If anyone needs me, I'll be in the shouting room.

      With my last breath, I curse Zoidberg!

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    16. Re:The ANSWER is... by adamanthaea · · Score: 3, Informative

      They also cut out the "although they killed our Lord" from the Wish Upon a Weinstein episode. And the Osama Bin Laden references are cut of adult swim and the dvd. The Osama references were cut at the request of the creator. Apparently, he was almost killed on 9/11 and thus had it pulled. I think it's a shame, because that bit was really freaking funny, but it's harder to get pissed at that cut than at a lot I've seen.

    17. Re:The ANSWER is... by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      ROFL I never saw that one. PLEASE PLEASE PUHLEEEEEASE BRING FAMILY GUY BACK!

      Hey lameness filter, ya don't suppose I wanted to shout eh?

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    18. Re:The ANSWER is... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I've found that beeps actually make things funnier. It's like bleeping the kids on South Park.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    19. Re:The ANSWER is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's nice to know the creator is such a thin skinned loser that he can't swallow his own medicine. Fine to be edgy, politically incorrect, and hurt other people, but, once it hits too close to home flip the switch on the old editing machine. If anything that cut makes me more pissed.

    20. Re:The ANSWER is... by xXunderdogXx · · Score: 1

      And if anyone needs me I'll bein the angry dome!

    21. Re:The ANSWER is... by Gid1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not strictly accurate: http://www.bupipedream.com/091903/release/r1.htm

      Despite his close-call experience on 9/11, MacFarlane regrets that "Rhode to Rhode Island" was cut from the DVD because it contains an Osama bin Laden joke - made well before 9/11/01.

      Also, http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/429/429628p7.htm l:

      IGNFF: What was the issue about the Osama Bin Laden joke, which made it to air originally, was excised from the re-air, and was excised from the disc?
      MACFARLANE: Yeah, again, that was one that the more I field this question, the more I think it should have been on. I was kind of neutral. They said, "Listen, we think we might cut this out," and I said, "Well, I don't know." [...] Yeah, my argument was, "Well, look. I missed that flight by 10 minutes and I'm okay with putting it on." I don't know. There were two arguments. There was the argument that, well, you know, it's an interesting piece of entertainment history and it was made two years before this happened, which I tend to agree with. It's just - take it for what it is.
    22. Re:The ANSWER is... by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      How? Who knew who Osama Bin Laden was before 9/11?

    23. Re:The ANSWER is... by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Showing feature length movies would be awesome. The problem is that movies take up a big chunk of air time. They would have to give the movies crappy spots or bump a lot of high rated shows. I would love for them to show movies from 4 to 7am and advertise that you should Tivo it.

      They've done it before, and even gone overboard with it. I've seen the new Scooby Doo movies advertised before, and they once held a bizarre Iron Giant marathon where they showed The Iron Giant about 9 times back to back.

  42. Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by ucsckevin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    relatively short network run may have helped DVD sales, Video Store's Judith McCourt says. "It really speaks to something that had a following, was cut off network TV, and people said, 'What did I miss?' "

    I don't think people are saying "hmm, I think I'll check out the family guy." Consumers of the DVD were fans of the show. It sounds like no one wants to admit that fox made a mistake when they cancelled it. Also I wonder if they make the same turn around when they see the strong Firefly DVD sales

    1. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Firefly sucked compared to what it replaced. Dark Angel was better. WAY better then Firefly. My wife even watched it and she's not the scifi freak I am. Oh how I miss seeing max kick some booty and look hot at the same time (Jessica Alba).

      --

      Gorkman

    2. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree with you more. The last episode set the next season up so perfectly (Max being true to her character and fighting society as a whole by taking a stand), then fox just yanks it. I wonder how much money it would cost to run a TV network now that evrything is digital, maybe setup a system like Transgaming(makers of winex) where subscribers(in this case donators) get to vote on which shows to revive, maybe charge $10 per vote, unlimite votes a slong as you have the money. If enough people got together, you could bring back great shows like Dark Angel and The Invisible Man, maybe even Lexx(though 4 seasons is a good run for a show like that, theres only so much you can do with a small crew like that).

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    3. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by Ibanez · · Score: 1

      Would YOU want to admit that your company made that big of a mistake? One question that no one I know ever gets tired of asking or hearing: How the HELL did they even think about canceling Family Guy, much less actually do it!?

      My girlfriend got me the third season for my bday, and I forced my mom to watch it. Needless to say, after the first one, she wasn't moving. I think she got more of the jokes than me, her being older and understanding some of the more obscure references.

      Its actually quite funny when you watch the show, because two questions when seperate are not worthy of notice, but together make an odd pair....

      1. How did they even manage to get the show on the air in the first place ( Honestly, the show is VERY vulgar...never seen anything like it on a national TV channel). Hell, its vulgarity is almost a slightly less blatant South Park. Same jokes, just not so obvious...

      2. How did they ever take it off once they started it?

      Blake

    4. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1

      Dark Angel seemed to loose a lot of it's momentum after 9/11 when they put aside a lot of the post-terrorist-corrupt-police-state back plot.

      It was still a pretty good show in spite of this, but for me it lost a lot.

    5. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by Anenga · · Score: 1

      You are aware that Firefly is being made into a motion picture Movie and that the series will be returning to FOX with all of it's original cast, right? If not, Merry Christmas.

    6. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by dmachleid · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I think we should coordinate a mass buying of Firefly DVDs: every geek coast to coast should pre-order thru amzn or some such, so that these disks don't even stop in the warehouse!

      I'm personaly offended that shows like "charmed" continue to polute our culture while works of art like firefly are consigend to anonymity!

      --
      9:48pm up 426 day(s), 6:01, 16 users, load average: 220.60, 138.45, 63.50
    7. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by ucsckevin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not to be rude, but it's not like the makers of Firefly are some children's charity. They'll do fine just on their own.

      Fox has got you in the palm of their hand if you think the firefly release is like some indie band from your college town that you want to help promote.

      I like firefly a lot (fyi)

    8. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by Blackhalo · · Score: 1

      Why thank you. I had grown to love this show, with all the different plot elements, character development, and some kick ass lowish budget action. I only saw it on broadcast TV once, (who knows what insane timeslot it was in) but managed to find all of the shown episodes on bit torrent. Note to TV execs, if I had not seen these, post cancelation, I would never have considerd buying them on DVD. Now, the DVD is a must have for me. Don't kill the goose that lays the golden egg by litigating torrent sites. As fun and convienent as DivX/Xvid torrents are, nothing seems to beat having a hard copy on DVD.

      --
      "There is nothing to do it. But to do it." -Floyd Pepper
    9. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by sfe_software · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think people are saying "hmm, I think I'll check out the family guy." Consumers of the DVD were fans of the show.

      I also suspect (like with Futurama, though to a lesser extent here) that the type of people who would allow a Nielson box in their homes are not the type of people who watch Family Guy. I also suspect that this is why we see so many "millionaire" shows, and Judge this and Jerry that...

      It's a biased system in the first place, in that there is (I suspect) a rather narrow class of people that would participate in Nielson ratings (and answer Arbitron's unsolicited phone surveys, etc).

      That's my theory anyway...

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    10. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well I have good news then. Tivo is selling ratings. That means geeks are enjoying an unsually strong instance of influencing TV.

    11. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by ImpTech · · Score: 1

      Well I think its true that most of the Family Guy DVD sales and Cartoon Network viewers were already fans of the show, somehow I don't think Firefly is going to get even remotely the same kind of reception. Firstly, they didn't air more than a handful of episodes, so how big could the fanbase possibly be? Further, the fanbase is going to be strictly scifi types, which I suspect are nowheres near as plentiful as the Family Guy faithful. I mean, EVERY guy I knew at college knew about and worshiped Family Guy, from virtually all majors. In fact, it turned out my realtor was a big fan. I think Family Guy just had a more universal appeal than Firefly ever could have.

      I, for one, didn't even like Firefly, and if you can't even win over people like me, you're not winning over the more mainstream audience, and you'll never see the same kind of out-of-woodwork support Family Guy has experienced.

    12. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      I hope this isn't an ominous sign (and I doubt it is, since I am insignificant in the grand scheme of things), but what's Firefly?

    13. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by mshiltonj · · Score: 1

      Also I wonder if they make the same turn around when they see the strong Firefly DVD sales

      You took the words right out my mouth. I *so* hope that is the case. Firefly was an awesome show.

      Did you catch this /. story? Joss Whedon's Firefly Coming To The Big Screen. In the linked story, it says that Universal bought the rights to the show.

    14. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but DA really strapped on the skis for the big jump after the first season. Destroying Manticore was their plotline mistake. Yeah, at first it was kind of nice to see someone get out of the "being hunted by the government" plot without milking it too much, but everything past that point fell into a fairly simple pattern.

      TV GUIDE
      "Dark Angel"
      Tonight on Dark Angel, Max must find a genetically mutated monster from Manticore that escaped from the set of the X-Files. Also, Logan (learns how||forgets how) to walk.

      And I really liked the first season, too. :(

    15. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it did have Repetitive Plot Syndrom(tm), but so did Lexx during its second season, and it got much better after that. I think with a little time to adjust they could of done some great things. The episode 'Meow' (Max going into heat) really shows how well the directing was -- Obviously a ratings grabbing episode for sweeps month, but instead of having the entire episode based around sex, they focused on how undesirable it was for her to have those cravings. Verry well done IMO.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  43. Holler at me - extra footage by kberg108 · · Score: 0

    that rocks. As anyone else noticed extra footage in the Adultswim reruns? I noticed some things I didn't remember from the same episode that I saw on FOX. I could be totally wrong.

    --
    I like things that are sweet and not things that are lame. --
    1. Re:Holler at me - extra footage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peter: Sometimes is appropriate to swear...
      (flashback)
      Judge: Do you swear to tell the truth?
      Peter: I do, you bastard.

  44. Sorry by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry, I accidentally hit Submit instead of Preview. Here's another story on topic. (Please don't troll, it's an unmoderated forum.) The question is, why does Fox consider a return of Family Guy, a show about an average drunk Joe "General Public" Sixpack family, instead of the best science fiction show ever invented? Don't they want the support of intelligent geek/nerd/Slashdot community anymore? I don't understand. Could some "insider" comment on this issue?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Babylon 5 was the best science fiction show ever invented.

    2. Re:Sorry by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      From the number of posts here, I'd say they have the support of the slashdot community just for bringing back Family Guy... and I'd tend to agree, it's a damned funny show. It's not like the shows are mutually exclusive.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
  45. Favorite Moment by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    I love it when Stewie goes into daydreaming about doing the song "Rocketman" just like william shatner and of course all the Shatner references!! Especially when they killed shatner and a guy in a red Trek uniform said" who would've guessed that."

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  46. These need to come out on DVD. Now. by MsGeek · · Score: 2
    • The Twisted Tales of Felix The Cat.
    • MTV's Downtown.
    • MTV Oddities: The Maxx.
    • The entire Beavis and Butt-Head series.
    And most importantly...
    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:These need to come out on DVD. Now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was with you up until Daria.

    2. Re:These need to come out on DVD. Now. by cens0r · · Score: 2

      I want sifl-n-olly. The rips on my computer just aren't good enough.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    3. Re:These need to come out on DVD. Now. by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      Don't forgot Chuck Cirino's "Wierd TV"!

      I talked to Chuck by email a couple of months ago, he's working on bringing it back. He's been delayed because the original run's main executive producer, Todd Stevens (who produces 'Friends'), is busy over at NBC...

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    4. Re:These need to come out on DVD. Now. by maggotbrain_777 · · Score: 1

      Nice. the sex pistols still have some relevance. New time. same tune.

  47. Do I care? by purplejacket · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Stuff that matters?"

    What, pray, is this <censored/> doing on the front page of Slashdot?

    Just thought I'd echo the other guy's comment.

  48. Bloody Hell by Jareeedo · · Score: 3, Funny

    What the DEUCE!? That's bloody marvelous! Family guy is a virtual cornucopia of matriarchal matricide. Does anyone know for certain if Stewie's accent is modeled after a South African or some form of British? I guess I'm not worldly enough to tell ;-)

    1. Re:Bloody Hell by glassesmonkey · · Score: 1

      Get the making of Family Guy... it explains it all. I think it is DVD extras or something, (I got it off a torrent).. MacFarlane (Image/Spawn guy) tells all about Stewie and the origin of his affect and temperment.

    2. Re:Bloody Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Todd McFarlane != Seth McFarlane

    3. Re:Bloody Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seth MacFarlane (the creator) said that Stewie was based on Rex Harrison, who was Professor Higgins in My Fair Lady. I can definitely see that.

      ~Scotty B.

    4. Re:Bloody Hell by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Stewie was played by Rick Myal (sp?) who is a Brit.

      He was also Eddy in the (excellent) Bottom that ran for any years on the BBC. Something to get off DC and no mistake.

      --
      Beep beep.
    5. Re:Bloody Hell by freeweed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh. Dude, Seth MacFarlane is not the creator of Spawn / co-founder of Image Comics.

      That's Todd MacFarlane you're thinking of :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    6. Re:Bloody Hell by Jareeedo · · Score: 1

      Very cool. Btw, it sounds like you're talking about Todd MacFarlane, who is the Image/Spawn guy. Seth MacFarlane is the Family Guy ..guy. I'm going to look for that making-of.

    7. Re:Bloody Hell by _generica · · Score: 1

      what are you, nuts ???
      Rik Mayall was never the voice of stewie.

      Stewie is voiced by the creator of the show, Seth MacFarlane. He even won an emmy in 2000 for the voice of stewie.

      What drugs are you on ?

    8. Re:Bloody Hell by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Stewie is an "evil parody" of a famous british actor, whose name escapes me right now. I believe there are more than a couple interviews in which Seth is asked this question.

    9. Re:Bloody Hell by monkeymonster · · Score: 1

      BZZZZTTT - wrong answer.

      Stewie was voiced by series creator Seth MacFarlane (who also voiced Peter & Brian). Listening to him switch voices on the commentary track was pretty cool!

      I wish (P)Rick Mayal was doing more US - available work. Loved the Young Ones & one episode I caught on Bravo a couple years back of some series he did. If you mean that Rick Mayal. Seems like there might have been another...

    10. Re:Bloody Hell by Corbin+Dallas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seth MacFarlane was responsible for over a dozen voices, including Stewie. He also, like, created it and stuff.

      Can I have my free cookie now?

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
    11. Re:Bloody Hell by Accipiter · · Score: 1

      Did you see the episode where they play on the My Fair Lady storyline? Stewie attempts to teach the new 3 year-old girl next door proper English.

      "The life of the wife is ended by the knife!"

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  49. Yes!! by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

    So who's gonna start the online petition first?

    Seriously, Family Guy was the best thing to hit FOX since The Simpsons... I am still curious as to why they cut it in the first place, never actually got a straight answer but I would asume that it was due to it's... strong presentation.

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  50. More like GENTLE NIGERIANS AGAINST AIDS by frogsarefriendly · · Score: 0

    Remember, when you see GNAA, think gentle Nigerians in their quest to end AIDS!

  51. Not that hard to be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never got into this show. How is it better than the Simpsons or King of the Hill?

    The Simpsons haven't been funny in 5 years and KoTH has never been funny.

    1. Re:Not that hard to be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KoTH was funny when it was still Beavis & Butthead, but even then it was only slightly funnier than a trainwreck.

  52. Fair and balanced by not_bio · · Score: 1

    It is refreshing to have Fox take time out from their Fair and Balanced broadcasting to bring back a show as cool as this.

  53. Ok but I hope some changes are taken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could someone give the family guy other personality besides the "Im a Homer Simpson clone"? the same goes for the 2 uninteresting kids (can they sent them away to college or something?) need personalities as well and the talking dog definetily must go, whose idea was that ? just leave the mom, the family guy doing something besides being Homer Simpson , the egomaniac/genius/homicidal baby and the media/entertainment spoofs and you have a show.

  54. well, that's great. by perrin5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That sets a precident.

    everybody, go buy the Firefly DVD set as soon as it's out.

    --
    hmmmm?
    1. Re:well, that's great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what a "precedent." A product becomes immensly popular and suddenly the company that created it starts making more of it. Everybody, go out and buy your favorite goods and start the revolution. Is this really that surprising? It's the same phenomenon as a sequel. Hopefully it doesn't produce the crap that's usually associated with sequels, but as long as all the writers come back they should be in good shape.

  55. A sign you've been on Slashdot too long by Atario · · Score: 1

    You refer to the wishes of fans of a show as "user demand".

    You'll be ok, just get some coffee in you...er, out of you...

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:A sign you've been on Slashdot too long by iammaxus · · Score: 1

      actually i was more just jumping at the oppurtuninty at posting at a virgin (read no comments) story. I didnt really think, just wanted that first spot. Shit, i have been on /. too long.... But what do you mean, how is that not user demand?

    2. Re:A sign you've been on Slashdot too long by Atario · · Score: 1

      Well...not to put too fine a point on it, but generally fans of a show are not referred to as "users" of the show, the way they are with software.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    3. Re:A sign you've been on Slashdot too long by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Well...not to put too fine a point on it

      There's a little birdhouse in your soul, isn't there?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  56. Yessssssss! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally maybe Fox finally realized that the Simpsons have lost it over the past few years.

  57. Victory is ours! by Predathar · · Score: 1

    So glad to hear about this. This, along with Buffy and Angel made up my week's worth of television, now I am down to only Angel (although this season is GREAT so far imho).

    Way to go FOX, bring it back, don't hesitate!

  58. There IS a God!!!!! by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

    Family Guy is, hands down, my favorite tv show of all times.

    1. Re:There IS a God!!!!! by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

      HALLELUJAH!! How many times I've said that FOX was CrAzY for canceling The Family Guy (TFG). I watch it religiously on the Cartoon channel during Adult Swim. WE LOVE IT!

  59. Giggidy-Giggidy-Giggidy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Allllriiiight!

    1. Re:Giggidy-Giggidy-Giggidy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hold old are you?
      16.
      18? You're first!
      Mom!
      I like where this is going...Alllriiiiight.

  60. A blessing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have missed this show for quite some time. Remember the New Year's day episode? Priceless!!

  61. Awesome! by Adam_Trask · · Score: 1
    There is God...i know now.

    Or, there are morons who can learn from their mistakes.

    Either way, can't complain.

    1. Re:Awesome! by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      But, As you know, we of the christian faith believe that there is a God, but that he must let the world think that he doesn't exist, until he can find a way to control the raging spirit that dwells within him!

      duh dah da duh dah!

  62. What they don't know... by whitefox · · Score: 1

    What they don't know is I can now return all 1M copies I bought and exchange them for Buffy, Angle, Dark Angel, Raiders, Hot Beach Bunnies. What a great way to screw with their statistics! :)

  63. Firefly's next! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    One can hope :)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  64. Ohhhhh yes.... by SARSpatient · · Score: 1

    The DVD sales and Cartoon network ratings must have spoken! This calls for some music! Oh, oh, oh, wait. Play that "sad walking away music" from the Incredible Hulk.

  65. YES! Thank God someone agrees with me. (n/t) by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Dummy text to get past lamness filter Blaaaa

  66. This show is about as subtle and clever.. by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 1

    as a 3 stooges bit.

    It suffers from the same crappiness that some Simpsons episodes (esp. newer) suffer from - no subtlety. The best Simpsons episodes have witty humor that's not just plain old slapstick.

    1. Re:This show is about as subtle and clever.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, wrong answer. Just because a show contains slapstick doesn't mean that's all it has. Family Guy had it all. There were obvious sight gags of course, but it had enough obscure references to satisfy even the most hardened MST3K fan. (Note: I said hardened. Not bitter and jealous.) I've watched every episode countless times but still, just once in a while, I'll catch something new, even something small like a tiny sign in the background I never noticed before. There are all kinds of jokes coming at you and just because many of them are easy to spot doesn't mean the show has no subtelty. It has it where appropriate.

      That said, Simpsons hasn't been funny for at least five years. And trying to compare old school Simpsons to Family Guy is riduclous because they were totally different styled. Nowadays it seems like Simpsons just wishes it was Family Guy and they try to force the show into a style of humor that just doesn't work best with it. Characters have become bizarre caricatures of their former selves. This style of humor just doesn't work in the Simpsons and it ruined a great show. It's right at home in Family Guy though.

  67. News for Nerds ? by EmCeeHawking · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is not Firefly, this is not Farscape, this is not Star Trek. As far as I'm able to tell, it is a short-lived cartoon that I nobody I know had heard about until today.

    Could someone please explain to me how this possibly qualifies as important enough to make the front page of Slashdot ?

    1. Re:News for Nerds ? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      This is not Firefly, this is not Farscape, this is not Star Trek. As far as I'm able to tell, it is a short-lived cartoon that I nobody I know had heard about until today.

      Yep it is a cartoon and very well done, IMO. When it comes to Fox standards the length of a runnning means nothing. To some people it ranks up there with Farscape and Star Trek. The only thing I can suggest is that you watch an episode for yourself and make your own decision. Just be ready for some cynical humour.

      Of course you are open to your taste.

      Family Guy

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  68. A shame by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

    That you have to have high sales to be worth of TV air. What about quality? I knew that Family Guy would be a worthy heir of the simpsons as soon as I saw the 1st episode. Whatever happened to giving someone a chance to prove himself? This is like the vicious circle Job needs Experience, Need Experience for Job.

    --
    Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  69. Agreed; and don't forget these either by Atario · · Score: 2
    • The complete Aeon Flux
    • The complete Liquid Television
    • All the Spike & Mike festivals
    • Max Headroom
    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:Agreed; and don't forget these either by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2

      I'd like to add the SIfl and Olly show. Really funny in a stupid sort of way, but thats why it was best aired at 3am when that humor works best.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:Agreed; and don't forget these either by Atario · · Score: 1

      Agh! You're right! And I totally, wrongfully, forgot the companion show, "Super Adventure Team". Dysfunctional Thunderbirds are Go!

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    3. Re:Agreed; and don't forget these either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the complete The Maxx.

      And if you like spike and mike, check out http://www.animationshow.com/ too . . .

    4. Re:Agreed; and don't forget these either by iantri · · Score: 1

      You can watch Max Headroom, at least, on TechTV, just in case you didn't know.

    5. Re:Agreed; and don't forget these either by acxr+is+wasted · · Score: 1

      Aww you are absolutely right about Liquid TV. There is no show I miss more than that! Does anyone remember the "BIG IF"? And Dogboy? How about "the Naked Truth" on stick figure theatre? I never saw the last one.. I need closure! One short I remember quite vividly but can't figure out what it was called. It was, I believe, set to Vivaldi's four seasons, and had a dry voice reading off words from the dictionary ("accede.. accelerate.. archive..")

      --
      "Come on, let's go drink till we can't feel feelings anymore."
    6. Re:Agreed; and don't forget these either by acxr+is+wasted · · Score: 1

      Chester: "Heh. Eh. Heh. Robot.. took my sandwich."

      'nuff said

      --
      "Come on, let's go drink till we can't feel feelings anymore."
    7. Re:Agreed; and don't forget these either by llin · · Score: 1

      In case anyone isn't aware, Season 3 (unaired) of the Sifl and Olly show is available online: http://www.sifl-n-olly.com/merch/.

      The rest, sadly, is still unavailable except via P2P/VHS (I guess MTV controls the rights for those).

  70. That splooshing song you here... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
    ...is that sound of million fan boys having sudden explosive orgasms.

    With Farscape returning, maybe we do have some control over this behemoth called television.

    Now the just need to announce a reality show where they put the network execs who greenlighted past reality shows on a jungle island and let frustrated TV veiwers hunt them with bow and arrows...

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

  71. Care to speak English? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    And explain how matricide can NOT be matriarchal? Or are you just throwing around big words you don't know the meanings of to sound important? Since thins is /. I would guess the latter.

    1. Re:Care to speak English? by Jareeedo · · Score: 1

      Wow...Someone needs their diaper changed.

    2. Re:Care to speak English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "brunes69, meet humor."
      "Humor, this is brunes69."

      Now that the introductions are out of the way, maybe you two have some catching up to do.
      Also, you may want to go ahead and pull your head out of your ass.

    3. Re:Care to speak English? by Senator_B · · Score: 1

      That may be a stewie quote. its certainly something he would say.

  72. Woo! by macgyvr64 · · Score: 1

    Yeah America's great isn't it? Except for the south.

  73. All 3 DVD's by rf0 · · Score: 1

    Well I've got all 3 seasons on DVD and can bring a smile even on the worse days. However more would be cool.

  74. His chin disturbs me by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I'm a fan of the show but is it just me or does it look like he has balls hanging off of his chin?

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:His chin disturbs me by NamShubCMX · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's actually a (very funny) joke about this in an episode (the episode with the "special people olympics")

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    2. Re:His chin disturbs me by interociter · · Score: 1

      They addressed that once. Peter grabs at his chin and says "What the hell? What are these doing up here?" (or words to that effect). Then he pulls his chin off and stuffs it/them down his pants. Not the classiest gag, but still funny.

      --
      Interociter
      -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
  75. the best news by jevring · · Score: 1

    this is the best news I've heard in a long time.
    If they do it, I'll (try) to never say a bad word about fox again.
    the 3 pal dvd-boxes were some of my most used purchases.

    --
    Move sig!
  76. Re:At least the BSD mascot troll lost out by crzfire · · Score: 1

    actually shes in her early 20s. I was at that con and I was working for a company that worked closly with FreeBSD and got introduced to her. she was actually pretty cool

    --
    life sucks, then you die
  77. Good cartoons are quite rare nowadays by zeux · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When I was younger (12 to 15 years ago) we had great cartoons on TV in France.

    They were really interesting and informative. For instance we had a cartoon called 'Les mysterieuses cites d'or' (something like 'The mysterious gold cities'). It was a story in about 30 episodes that took place in South America in the 16th or 17th century.

    Through this cartoon I learned lots of things on Incas and other cultures. It was really cool and after each episode they put a very short film with real facts explaining something that appeared in the cartoon just before (a culture fact, etc).

    Nowadays cartoons seems to use more and more slang and violence. I think that's a pity...

    What kind of cartoons did you have in USA 20 years ago ?

    1. Re:Good cartoons are quite rare nowadays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Good cartoons are quite rare nowadays by LucidityZero · · Score: 1

      I remember watching that show in Holland as a kid! That show was just phenominal! Every few years I make an attempt to track them down on video or DVD, but so far I haven't had too much luck... I did hear about a year ago (last time I did that search) that they were showing the show again somewhere in Canada... I hope to find all the episodes on DVD someday...

      --
      Sig.i>
  78. This news makes me so happy.... by switcha · · Score: 1

    I could F'n cry.

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    1. Re:This news makes me so happy.... by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

      It's "Laugh and Cry" but of course it sounds cool cause stewie is saying it.

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    2. Re:This news makes me so happy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The line was laugh and cry. FYI.

    3. Re:This news makes me so happy.... by dacetone · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's both. Watching older episodes with CC on shows 'F'n cry'. Later episodes show 'Laugh and Cry' I have no idea why.

      --
      Just follow the day, and reach fo
  79. There is a God! by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    "And he's so deliciously evil! ... Gotta get me some of that!"

  80. List of characters is not the difference by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So they have similar characters. Big deal. The difference is in the style. Family Guy used the 'flashback' joke a LOT, as in: "Oh, they don't let Peter rent from the video store anymore because he kept recording over the tapes. {cut to scene of opening of 'citizen kane', which goes staticy for a second and then it's Peter on a couch, obviously being filmed with a home video camera, saying "It's a freakin sled, okay! Rosebud is a freakin' sled! There, now I just saved you from wasting two boring pointless hours of your life.", and then the movie continues.}

    The Simpsons generally tried to stick to the story, and use the plot for the humor, while Family Guy was usually funny *despite* the plot, because the humor was in fast, small snippets.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    1. Re:List of characters is not the difference by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 1

      "So they have similar characters. Big deal."

      I know, but I was referring to the basic premise behind the show- the characters, setting, etc.

      You're right about the style. I agree that Family Guy pulls it off better, due to quick, funny jabs at pop-culture.

      Some of my favorite scenes include Peter and Brian at the brewery (with heavy reference to Charlie and the Chocolate Factory), as well the backgound on why Joe became handicapped after fighting the Grinch.

      --
      Sigs are for losers
    2. Re:List of characters is not the difference by ConsistentChaos · · Score: 0

      I think the line was "two long boobless hours", actually.

    3. Re:List of characters is not the difference by RickoniX · · Score: 1

      Although in another episode they called his paralysis ironic, then showed a scene where a bunch of criminals essentially piled on him and beat him crippled

      --
      Geekleak.com - Silly name, serious geeks
    4. Re:List of characters is not the difference by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      I agree that Family Guy pulls it off better

      I didn't say that. I said the styles are different, and the humor comes from different parts. One uses the quick tangents as the source of humor, and the other uses the mainline story. I actually slightly prefer the Simpsons' style, and the only reason Family Guy was more interesting was because Simpsons' was on for so long already and starting to run down. Compare second or third season Simpsons to second or third season Family Guy and I would prefer Simpsons (but only slightly. They were both good.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  81. A Riddle by macgyvr64 · · Score: 1

    Peter: Ok, here's another riddle. A woman has two children. A homicidal murderer tells her she can only keep one. Which one does she let him kill?
    Brian: That's... that's not a riddle. That's... that's just terrible.
    Peter: Wrong, the ugly one!

  82. Special Unit 2: SU2 by The+UberDork · · Score: 0

    Boy I wish UPN would get in the DVD release game! I'd love a set of SU2 DVD's ... since we are on the topic of great shows cancelled before their time.

  83. top DVD sets that have to come out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So nimrod execs can realize they made a HUGE mistake.

    5.-Batman Beyond (damn you Pokemon!)

    4.-Firefly

    3.-Daria (Proof that intelligent people dont watch
    TV as much as they should, otherwise we wouldnt have "reality" shows.)

    2.-Futurama (further proof)

    1.-Star trek: (just to throw it on the face of the guy who cancelled star trek and then throw it on the faces of the execs who cancelled futurama)

    Almost off topic:

    Did you guys knew there are rumors execs are considering Tv series for "star wars" (cartoons and live action!) And .. "the matrix?".

    if those two get green ligthed and then some moron cancels them.... I would have to buy a lot of dvds I guess.

  84. stewie sounds noble british by caveat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    South Africans have a distinctly different sound, even though they describe themselves as "sounding a bit British" - like canadians and americans. Stewie sounds rather well-bred, and acts the part; the ep with the girl who speaks Cockney is classic for this..."Ugh, she doesn't speak the language so much as murder it."

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:stewie sounds noble british by Nerull · · Score: 1

      I havn't seen that episode, but supposidly he is modeled after Professor Higgins from Pygmalion/My Fair Lady. From your description, that episode is most certianly a parody of that story, as Higgins says the same thing about Eliza's speach (also cockney). Higgins was most definatly upper class british.

    2. Re:stewie sounds noble british by Flower · · Score: 1
      Obligatory quote: (sung to the tune Rain In Spain from My Fair Lady)

      Stewie: And where's the knife?

      Cockney Girl: In the wife. In the wife!

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    3. Re:stewie sounds noble british by op51n · · Score: 1

      Plus the Cockney girl, is called Eliza.
      From memory (not very good) It was Eliza Hinkley or something similair.

    4. Re:stewie sounds noble british by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      actually it was more along the lines of "she doesn't speak the language so much as chew it up and spit it out". I only remember that because it made milk shoot out my nose.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    5. Re:stewie sounds noble british by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      Haha, you just reminded me of (roughly) this line too, also from that episode:

      "I didn't think she was born, but more like she congealed in a gutter somewhere."

      Fucking hilarious.

  85. Re:Profit Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Post same worn-out joke
    2. Get modded up, somehow.
    3. ????
    4. Profit!

  86. Daria sucked, dude. by Selecter · · Score: 0

    12 to 15 yr ols girls were the target for that crap and thats the only poeple who ever watched it.

  87. Seth McFarlane==Genius!! by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    His work especially family guy was so very very good! He started out doing "Johny Bravo" episodes and any Johnny Bravo Episode that is written by Seth has a lot of innuendo and humour that they are almost on par with family guy.

    The man is hopefully going to be the next Matt Groineig or "Matt and Trey from southpark fame".

    If I see a Johnny Bravo episode written by Seth I will watch the whole thing through.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  88. Not that incredible by kantai · · Score: 1

    Family Guy was not that incredible. The shwos were all very repetetive, each episode had Peter screwing something up, having a flashback, stewie attempting to murder the mom and then the problem being fixed. EVERY single episode. I'm not saying it isnt funny, it's just not incredible. Ranked after Futurama and Simpsons, but still decent.

  89. Bring them together. by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

    I don't know anything about the series, except for having seen it. :) Who made it and will they be able to assemble the team again for the project?
    We all know that when people work well together magic happens and the sum of their work is greater than the total of what each has put into it.
    You cannot expect to get the same result with different people as we have seen on the Simpsons where it was easy to see where Conan O'Brien left and the time it took to bring back the same quality(although some will say that it never did but don't listen to those old school hardcore dudes)... I am starting to ramble, cu :)

  90. Re:EXACTLY. Fox mismanaged those shows... by bugsmalli · · Score: 1

    Well, I never watched it on fox but I catch a show everynight at 10:00 pm central on Cartoon Network. I agree, Futurama is one of the best shows ever!!!

  91. Great news! by zonix · · Score: 1

    This is great news, indeed!!!

    Not so long ago I read that Seth was also about to do a direct-to-DVD Family Guy movie. Perhaps FOX changed their minds and wanted whole season instead?

    Seth's previous comments from an interview:

    "It's all come down to the budget right now. We're hashing it out [...] It would be a direct-to-DVD project."

    But wait, there's more. This might still be on the rumor stage, but something about FOX having Seth create another series. Do a Google search! In short:

    This series focuses on a family consisting of Stan, a right-leaning C.I.A. agent; his wife; their two kids, including a liberal daughter; a housebound alien named Roger; and a French-speaking goldfish. Like "Family Guy," MacFarlane plans to provide several of the character voices.

    It sounds weird, I know. :-)

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  92. Cartoon Network envy by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    >gave it a shitty timeslot so nobody watched it.

    Which timeslot? I remember being moved at least twice.

    Also, let's toss in Futurama while we're at it.

    All the cartoon network did is take these gems and give them a consistant timeslot and *gasp* did some advertising. Now Rupert Murdoch et al are all scracting their heads at how much money CN is making and why dreck like "King of the Hill" isn't the cash cow it used to be.

    I think you're right, I'd rather just buy the DVD than deal with FoxVision - where the shows you expect to see aren't there! Here, have some football instead.

    Hell, if Cartoon Network had Fox-like money they'd be doing this too and with Futurama.

    (above message from a Tivo owner and I still couldnt record Futurama because of football, for shame Fox)

    1. Re:Cartoon Network envy by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I would add "The Critic" to this list as well. I thought it was freakin hilarious. Someone must have agreed because it went through three generations before it finally got killed for good.

      ABC then Fox then Comedy Central.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    2. Re:Cartoon Network envy by screwballicus · · Score: 1


      I think you're right, I'd rather just buy the DVD than deal with FoxVision


      This is a common question regarding musicians, but not as common a one when applied to shows:

      Can anyone inform on which better profits the original creators: DVD sales or a station picking up reruns? I realise this is perhaps oversimplistic, and if it is, please expand as necessary on how so.

      I'm completely oblivious to how financial compensation and royalties to the artists are paid in each of these cases, and oblivious to finance in general for that matter. But obviously if the various routes to the episodes are all the same to me, I'd like to know which is best for the artists in the end.

  93. Got it backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please explain to me why you are reading/posting on this site. Its not slashdots fault you either live under a rock or are a young child.

  94. /me does the happy dance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone at Fox finally got hit with a clue stick.

    Let's hope they got hit hard enough that they don't revive FG only to stick it in the 7pm Sunday football-season-timeslot-of-death.

    How about killing unfunny dreck like King of the Hill or Malcolm in the Middle, instead?

  95. Fox needs something to replace the Simpsons by mmkay76 · · Score: 1

    or can the Simpsons last forever?

  96. Favorite Quagmire quote ... by zonix · · Score: 1

    "I felt guilty once but she woke up half way through".

    That's just so Quagmire! :-)

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    1. Re:Favorite Quagmire quote ... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      No, no, no...

      The best Quagmire quote has got to be:

      (Door bell rings)
      random girl:Hello?
      Quagmire:how old are you?
      random girl:16
      Quagmire:What 18? ok your first.
      random girl:MOM!
      Quagmire:your mom too? GIGIDY GIGIDY GI GI DY!

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    2. Re:Favorite Quagmire quote ... by zonix · · Score: 1

      Unless that part is censored on the new DVD's, he actually says "I like where this is going!", not "Your mom too?". :-)

      But that's nothing, how a bout this one:

      Quagmire: I don't know fellas, I think there's potential in this crowd! Heh.

      He approches a woman at the other end of the bar.

      Quagmire: Hey, honey! Why don't you turn around and show me the lower East Side!

      (The 'honey' turns around and answers...)

      Woman: Sure!

      (...in a gruff, manly voice.)

      Quagmire: Whoa! Transvestite! Back off! Wait a sec, pre-op or post-op?

      Tranny: Pre-op.

      Quagmire: Whoa! Transvestite! Back off!

      z
      --
      What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  97. Family Guy is comming back... hopefully by chrispyman · · Score: 1

    Id agree with everyone else that Fox really screwed up by canceling the show. Perhaps they just now realized that the DVD is selling like hotcakes and that its getting good ratings on Adult Swim. Either way, it was probably a combination of the ever-changing Fox timeslot and the controversy of the show that got Fox to cancel it in the first place.

  98. Peter Griffin != Homer Simpson by jameskojiro · · Score: 1, Funny

    Homer Simpson (Proper Noun) A lovable buffoon that is nice to his family, he may mess up, but always does what is right in the end. see also (do'h, doughnuts)

    Peter Griffin (Proper Noun) A total jackass who probably should be locked up cause he is a danger to himself and others. Often sadistic, he completely ignores his wife at times unless he wants to make nookie. He is caulous and mean and would hesitate to sell you out in a second. Despite all this he is really freeking funny. see also (sadistic, masochisim, dark, cynical)

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  99. no no no it's Allllllll-right! by caveat · · Score: 1

    Giggity giggity giggity!

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  100. Family Guy Rules by Spl0it · · Score: 1

    Victory is ours!
    bring back FAMILY GUY!

    --

    No, this is
  101. Re:YAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, no... god hates us all. don't kid yourself.

  102. That Does it!!!!! I am Buying Season 2 on DVD ! by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    I already own Season 1, if me buying Season 2 is the straw that breaks the camels back and causes another season to be made I am gonna do it!!!

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  103. Giggity Giggity Giggity! by pergamon · · Score: 1

    Heh-Allll Rrrriiiight...

  104. Not quite by theantix · · Score: 1

    I imagine that there are a lot of people out there like me... I watched the show a few times on FOX when it first came out, and thought it was crude and stupid and never gave it a second thought. But after seeing a bunch of the reruns on cable I've grown to be a huge fan of the show.

    --
    501 Not Implemented
  105. Here's the plan... by mog007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Fox does re-air Family Guy, we perform a slashdotting of their airwaves.

    All of slashdot can tune to Fox when they show Family Guy, and ha! We crash the Fox broadcasting tower... or just the part that tallys the ratings. We get the buffer to overflow and aha! Family Guy sticks around longer than the Simpsons.

    1. Re:Here's the plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if they have a Beowulf cluster of those towers you insensitive clod?!?

  106. Futurama, dammit!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ok, Family Guy was funny, kinda, in a "more clever than most crap on tv, but still pretty base, 'fart-joke-y' and uninteresting." Never really dug it myself, but to each their own.

    OTOH... **Futurama** was smart, insightful, intelligent, hysterical... and suffered from the same mismanagement / incorrect time slot / juggling / etc... try giving it a REAL chance, in a REAL time slot!

    Oh. Wait. Juvenile offensive humor. Never mind - that explains why Fox "executives" are reconsidering Family Guy.

    1. Re:Futurama, dammit!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Futurama sucked, it was like the simpsons.. now

      The simpsons suck too, but they were awesome a long time ago, futurama just sucked from the get-go

      Family guy has real satirical humor, its laugh-out-loud "my stomach hurts" smart humor.. Futurama is "ha-ha a robot thats an ass".. the humor wasnt smart and all the characters were blah

    2. Re:Futurama, dammit!! by Jackmon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you sure you're talking about the same shows as everyone else?!?

      I like the Family Guy a lot. But how can you possibly be a big fan of it and not love the Simpsons or Futurama? The Simpsons did go through a dry spell, but it's been pretty good lately. And Futurama's had a few episodes that weren't quite as good as the others, but overall the writing and animation is brilliant.

      Maybe I should have asked this at the get-go but are you just a troll?

    3. Re:Futurama, dammit!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BITE MY SHINY METAL ASS

  107. This is even on topic! by rufo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There was a Family Guy episode with some radio making Soviet Russia jokes - I don't remember the details. It's in the first DVD set.

    --
    My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    1. Re:This is even on topic! by clbyjack81 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "There was a Family Guy episode with some radio making Soviet Russia jokes - I don't remember the details"

      Peter makes a deal with the mob to get a new car. When he is showing it to Lois for the first time they get in and turn on the radio. Over the speakers comes, "In Soviet Russia, car drives you!"

      --
      Cole's Axiom: The sum of the intelligence on the planet is a constant. The population is growing.
  108. Will it have more shots of Lois... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naked?
    8-\

  109. FIREFLY! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 3, Informative

    The sad part is that they kill great shows to promote ones with far less lasting power.

    Indeed. *cough* Firefly *cough*...

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:FIREFLY! by Doverite · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't get the big deal about firefly it was a patent rip off of Farscape. All they did was get rid of the aliens for various humans and shuffle the personality quirks. Think about it.

      --
      You can legislate morally you can't legislate morality
    2. Re:FIREFLY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..well, this jsut goes to show what you even know about Firefly - there was never even a single alien in the whole show, idiot.

      It was *nothing* like Farscape, whatsoever. No similiarity, and no comparison.

    3. Re:FIREFLY! by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't get the big deal about firefly it was a patent rip off of Farscape.

      Lessee...

      Living spacecraft? Nope.
      Muppets? Nope.
      Aliens? Nope.
      Stranded, confused human in a strange alien civilisation? Nope.
      Screeching noise passing as intro music? Nope.

      Maybe the other way around...

      Pilot that plays with toy dinosaurs to pass the time during spaflight? Nope.
      Shameless western feel? Nope.
      Cute geek girl? Nope.
      Outlaw badass captain? Nope.

      Yeah...exactly alike.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:FIREFLY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really did try to like Firefly, but the whole over the top western motif was distracting. Some of the back story was interesting, but they didn't do much to advance it to a serial. Kinda like B5 the first couple of seasons; little nuggets of info about some greater plot, but all of the episodes wrapped up neatly in an hour.

    5. Re:FIREFLY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All they did was get rid of the aliens for various humans and shuffle the personality quirks. Think about it." "..well, this jsut goes to show what you even know about Firefly - there was never even a single alien in the whole show, idiot." I see you two agree on one point.

    6. Re:FIREFLY! by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      You forgot Futurama too.

    7. Re:FIREFLY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you got it. Firefly is (was) "shameless". It didn't care what it looked like, so long as the point got across. Firefly imitated everything shamelessly, and the imitations were mixed in for a unique feel.

      Western, Horror, SciFi, Action, Star Trek-like, Soap Opera, Teen drama, Sit-Com, Police Drama, Thriller, Mystery, etc. in only 14 episodes.

    8. Re:FIREFLY! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Firefly was one of my favorite shows. I think it's really cool that you're discussing Firefly and have a quote from the song in your sig.

      I hope they bring it back, especially in the correct order.

      You can get all Family Guy episodes from Kazaa. I'm stoked they're thinking about making new episodes, they just better put them somewhere and stick to the schedule which includes pre-empting baseball/football/hockey/basketball/ stickball/fuckball because I really don't care about all those balls.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    9. Re:FIREFLY! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I really don't care about all those balls.

      Yeah, I really wish that no caring about who threw the ball the most that day wouldn't make us second class TV viewing public.

      I mean, if Nasa can have its own 24h mission controll channel when there's a shuttle up, why couldn't they have a special extra channel in wich to air their stupid ball and preacher specials?

      Hell, there are specialty sports channel, have the sports on there! Make 'em non-pay-per-view when its the series or something.

      Or don't advertise shows to be airing when there's sport. Don't schedule new shows when there's sports, place reruns or infomertials there, stuff no one will miss!

      Of course, all of those would imply respect for the viewers, wich the networks execs clearly do not have.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    10. Re:FIREFLY! by egarland · · Score: 1

      I agree! I watched almost every Farscape and in the end, I have to say, it sucked at the end. The writing just went to hell and after they got rid of the plant chick it wasn't much worth watching. Firefly had good writing good music and was fun to watch. I loved the part where the captain was telling the assassins what to tell their boss and the guy wouldn't cooperate so he just kicked him into the intake of the engine grabbed the next guy, and started saying the same thing to him. Damn funny moment.

      I also liked the part in the pilot where the reavers are coming and the alliance marshal is holding the doctor's sister hostage and the captain just walks in, shoots him, and tosses him out the back. I like it when people take a typical TV show setup that we are used to seing turn into a long drawn out dramatc moment and just ending it cleverly. Like the bridge scene in My Big Fat Greek Wedding. It was just nice, they moved past all the stupid artificial melodrama that is in most movies and into the real melodrama that inevitably comes after.

      --
      set softtabstop=4 shiftwidth=4 expandtab nocp worlddomination
    11. Re:FIREFLY! by op51n · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it was funny, and better written. And didn't have shitty puppets and toilet humour... I never got Farscape. Tried to, since it was so much better than Star Trek and it's clones, but FireFly was the one that got me.

    12. Re:FIREFLY! by DaAdder · · Score: 1

      Actually, western-in-space has to be one of the least appealing themes a SciFi show could adapt in my taste (sort of like if you take a popular franchise and take it BACK in time as much as possible instead of forward, remove a lot of the interesting futuristic technologies that we've come to like instead of introducing new ones (*couch* Enterprise *cough*)), and yet somehow, firefly managed to enthrall me to no end.

      Quite a feat.

      I was extremely sad to see this show go, it showed great promise for the future.

      Who didn't shiver when men in the blue rubber gloves were hinted at now and again???? :)

    13. Re:FIREFLY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right that Western-in-space is hard to pull-off, but Firefly was one step worse than that. It was a "Southern" in space. Some of us are extremely glad that the south lost the civil war, and Firefly's demonization of the victorious 'alliance' (was that the name they used?) aka the United States really turned me off.

    14. Re:FIREFLY! by SB5 · · Score: 1

      Firefly has more in common with Star Wars than Farscape, how could he confuse the two?

      Pilot that plays with toy dinosaurs to pass the time during spaflight? No, but I would like to point out the Dejarik game with Chewie and C-3PO
      Shameless western feel? Yes, give Luke a horse instead of an X-wing, a gun instead of a lightsaber, and it starts to turn into a western, even the Cantina screams of a cliche dive bar in a Western.
      Cute geek girl? Does Natalie Portman count? She's cute, and geeks like her!
      Outlaw badass captain? Han Solo is THEE Badass outlaw captain.

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    15. Re:FIREFLY! by Wandering+Idiot · · Score: 1

      You're right that Western-in-space is hard to pull-off, but Firefly was one step worse than that. It was a "Southern" in space. Some of us are extremely glad that the south lost the civil war, and Firefly's demonization of the victorious 'alliance' (was that the name they used?) aka the United States really turned me off.

      I'm black, and I loved Firefly. And there was no slavery issue to put the Independents (or whatever they were called) in the moral wrong in the war. And the Alliance was, if I remember, fighting to control formerly independent colonies, not keeping together a prexisting political entity.

      So, in short, STFU. And if you refuse to watch shows for reasons of political correctness, what the hell are you doing in a Family Guy thread?

    16. Re:FIREFLY! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Shameless western feel? Yes, give Luke a horse instead of an X-wing, a gun instead of a lightsaber, and it starts to turn into a western, even the Cantina screams of a cliche dive bar in a Western.


      Ah! Much easier than that!
      Picture Han Solo...now picture him with a cowboy hat. that's right, he's dressed exactly like a cowboy, minus the hat. Funny huh? : )

      Cute geek girl? Does Natalie Portman count?

      Nope, that's beautifull princess...not the same thing.

      Pilot that plays with toy dinosaurs to pass the time during spaflight? No, but I would like to point out the Dejarik game with Chewie and C-3PO

      Again, not really. One is a lonely childish act spawned out of pure boredom, the other is a social game of wits and strategy...

      But the whole "captain with his own ship, smuggling and transporting passagers wanted by the evil authorities while dressed like a cowboy minus the hat" applies to both though : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  110. Mod parent up by Bobulusman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Family Guy was ok, but I felt like I needed ADD just to keep up with how much they randomly changed topics.

    Now, Futurama, that was a show to savor. You had such a good mix of comedy and drama. You had story arcs, plot, character development, and most scifi inside-jokes than anyone could catch. Just look at "Jurassic Bark": Dolemite references and an ending that genuinely make me tear up, something that a television show has never make me do before.

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    1. Re:Mod parent up by mek2600 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah but for the millions of us with ADD there is no better way to take advantage of the affliction than by watching Family Guy. I never thought I'd say this, but Fox rules.

    2. Re:Mod parent up by glenebob · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speak faster please. My mind wondered after the

    3. Re:Mod parent up by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Family Guy had moments of pure comedic gold...along with an endless supply of fart and gross out jokes. I mean the episode where Stewie mind controlled Chris and attempted to purchase power tools while being panhandled. Priceless. The scene immediatly after where Peter tries to seduce Luke Perry. Vile.

      Futurama certainly delved into the potty humor on occasion as well, but they knew when to go easy on the cheap humor.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  111. $Neilson? by RedA$$edMonkey · · Score: 1

    So if we all go out and buy a million copies of Firefly on DVD and all the other promising shows that those dumbfucks canceled they'll bring them back too?

  112. Futurama Futurama Futurama!!!!! by Jackmon · · Score: 1

    Futurama...

    And I even like the Family Guy. But Dammit, more Futurama!!!!

    Futurama.

  113. BS&P. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I remember this lovely episode of Millenium, "Somehow Satan Got Behind Me", on of the too-few works of Darin Morgan. There's a segment in it about a Broadcast Standards and Practices censor driven mad by a little dancing devil. The guy's a hoot.

    Censor: Unacceptable. If you are going to show a pile of dung, it must be dried dung, not moist.

    Censor: No, it doesn't matter that aliens from out of space have no genitalia---they still have groins, and they shouldn't be kicked there. It is unacceptable, revise for cut!

    Censor: You will not get away with this! The final scene is gratuitously violent! Aliens would not carry an Uzi! They are a superior race and they would not carry or utilize automatic weapons! I will not approve this! I am Broadcast Standards and Practices!

    Heck, you can even get the episode off ed2k. (The show doesn't air much anymore; most of it was apparently crap.)

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:BS&P. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* Stupid Slashdot. The link is

      ed2k://|file|Millennium 2x21 - Somehow, Satan Got Behind Me [zr] .avi|261216256|106DB7BC0CBA7DBECCA22DF8FF70C73D|/

  114. *sniff* by jr87 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    just so Happy!!! ^_^ :'-)

  115. Favorite stewie quotes by Bigmell · · Score: 5, Funny

    My favorite quotes, cant remember them exactly but i'll try...

    Meg: Happy Birthday Stewie! You want some ice cream?

    Stewie: yes, but NO SPRINKLES! For every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you.
    -----------
    Mom: You look as happy as when you were born

    Stewie: But of course, that was my victory day, the fruition of my deeply laid plans to escape from that curse-ed ovarian bastille. (looks at mother who has his mind control device) Return the device woman!

    -----------
    Stewie: Excellent! The weather machine is nearly completed! What do you say to that broccoli? (broccoli just sits there)... STOP MOCKING ME!
    -----------
    Mom: Stewie, why dont you play in the other room.
    Stewie: Why dont you BURN IN HELL!
    -----------
    Stewie: (in diaper) I say, am I to spend the entire day wallowing around in my own feces?
    -----------
    Stewie: (Captured in airport trying to escape by security guard) Damn you! You're one of them arent you? What are they paying you? I'll double it! I'll give you whatever you want! Money! Women! (looks at him precariously) Men?
    -----------
    Stewie: (to Mom) Ohhh blast you and your estrogenical treachery!
    -----------
    Stewie: Well well Mother... We meet again!
    Mom: Stewie I thought I tucked you in an hour ago?
    Stewie: Not tightly enough it would seem! And now you contemptible harpy I shall end your oppressive reign of matriarchal tyranny.
    ------------
    Stewie: (to mom) Damn you vile woman! You've impeded my work since the day I escaped from your wretched womb.

    Im sure there are lots more :)

    1. Re:Favorite stewie quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her name is not "Mom," it's Lois, and she's hot.

    2. Re:Favorite stewie quotes by LazyBoy · · Score: 1

      Well, let me consult my agent -- Mr. Irving R. POINTYSTICK!

      --

      If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

    3. Re:Favorite stewie quotes by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 2, Funny
      Don't forget Stewie teething. It's my favorite Stewie dialog. I only saw it once many years ago, but it goes something like this.

      closeup of stewie's mouth. A tooth pops up through the gums.
      Tooth 1 : I declare this mouth in the name of incisor.
      Another tooth pops through the gums
      Tooth 1 : Ach, bicuspid! My Nemesis!
      Tooth 2 : Incisor! I shall kill you now.
      teeth wriggle for a few seconds, making no progress on their death wishes
      Tooth 2 : Oh well. On the count of three, bite the tongue.

    4. Re:Favorite stewie quotes by fiftyfly · · Score: 2, Funny
      Im sure there are lots more :)
      Well for my money the best stewie line ever was more of a visual.
      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    5. Re:Favorite stewie quotes by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

      STEWIE: What the deuce are you looking at? It is a tuna fish sandwich and nothing else.

      Cannon retracts into tuna fish sandwich

      I love the kid. No evil, just differently motivated.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    6. Re:Favorite stewie quotes by Accipiter · · Score: 1

      Same episode, when Stewie is complaining of the pain of teething and Peter gives him some Whiskey to dull it out.

      Peter: "There, how's that feel?"
      Stewie: "Well it's it's... it's DELIGHTFUL."

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    7. Re:Favorite stewie quotes by eoyount · · Score: 1

      My favorite line was right before that...

      "Agh, good God, man! One can only imagine what foul regions that finger has erstwhile probed!"

      --
      To understand recursion,
      you must first understand recursion.
    8. Re:Favorite stewie quotes by rnelsonee · · Score: 1

      I installed a random quote generator on my site and filled it up with a few hundred Family Guy quotes. I've caught people simply refreshing the page over and over...

  116. Facial anatomy by Shoten · · Score: 1

    Will he ever get an answer to the classic question:

    "Why are my balls on my face?"

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Facial anatomy by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      he did! it was in an episode whose title i cannot recal, someone back me up here. it went something like this:

      "what are these doing up here"

      am i right? or was i high?

    2. Re:Facial anatomy by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      shit, shoulda previewed

      again, it went:

      * feels at chin *
      "what are these doing up here?"
      * grabs chin, shoves down pants *

  117. better yet... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    eheheheh sweeet.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  118. A TV classic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funniest animated show since "The Critic" Woo hoo! My sides are achin' just thinking about. (cough)

  119. Eh? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Family guy had a gay dog too.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Eh? by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the various episodes with the gay dog were not about the gay dog, nor did it end with the message "it's ok to be gay." Still, South Park is still on the air while Family Guy was cancled.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
  120. Best news ever... by tizen · · Score: 1

    Oh my god, this is the best news ever, had I known that there was a possibility for new episodes based on DVD sales I would of bought 3 or 4 copies... -tiz

  121. peter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'its about friggin time, lois'

  122. #4 ever? by p4r4d0x · · Score: 1

    Anyone know what the top 3 were?

  123. Another obligatory FG quote by daVinci1980 · · Score: 1

    News Correspondant Takanawa: Hold on, due to an anonymous tip, we are going to the house of the real arsonist.
    Fire breathing beatle: Goood. Gooood.

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
  124. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  125. Daria, without butchered soundtrack by Hecatonchires · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whenever they release something for Daria, they don't include the amazing soundtrack/BGM that set the emotional level of each scene.

    I'm in to buy all 5 seasons and the movie if its done right.

    --

    Yay me!

  126. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up you moron. Don't waste everyone's time posting garbage like this.

  127. modus operandii by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

    I get the distinct impression the people who get shows on the air don't have anything to do with what stays on air. There's no point in finding new talent if you're going to crush it under your bootheel by cancelling it and not letting it go to another station.

    Unless thats the whole point.

    *shakes fist*

    --

    Yay me!

  128. Meh by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

    I'd rather a spinoff 'Tales of the Slayer' type show - short story arcs of heroism etc, with quick nasty brutal violent deaths.

    Mmm, maybe I need to interact with other people in a more positive social environment.

    --

    Yay me!

  129. waiting till someone invents the thinglonger... by dmnic · · Score: 2, Funny

    then we can use it to turn on the what-if machine!

  130. rtfa by boarder · · Score: 1

    As the article clearly stated, not every show with a cult following can be brought back, and for good reason.

    The cast of Family Guy is all created, so it can just "be drawn back into existence." The cast of Firefly has gone on to other projects (or at least have tried to). There's a chance not all of them will want to return, a chance some of them can't return due to other commitments, a chance their physical appearance has changed too much, etc.

    The show is recent enough, though, that an attempt to return isn't TOO out of the question; but I wouldn't hold my breath. I liked that show a lot, and I'm not much into scifi.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
    1. Re:rtfa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell kind of comment is that? The character's aren't all voiced by a single person -- and even if they were, what if that single person wasn't interested in returning?

      The same restrictions apply -- nobody's really willing to listen to a Peter Griffin who sounds liked a warmed over Fred Flinstone.

      Dammnit, you made me lose my mod points. Fuck you, you fucking fuck.

    2. Re:rtfa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Fuck you, you fucking fuck.

      Wow, now THAT is what I call an "Applied Monty Python" reference! (i.e. "Fuck the fucking fuckers")

    3. Re:rtfa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, considering the creator of the show (Seth McFarlane) does three of the main characters himself (Brian, Peter, Stewie), you just have to work on the rest. The hardest to get would probably be Seth Green (Chris plus others) and Mila Kunis (Meg plus others), but after listening to Seth Green's commentary on the DVD's, I think he was having enough fun that he'd want to do it. And I'm sure Mila could squeeze in time between That 70's Show episodes.

      I think part of the brilliance of Family Guy is that so many of the characters ARE voiced by just a few people (check imdb).

      Hmmm...might be trickier to get Patrick Warburton back, but hey, maybe he's game too.

  131. "Rick" did not play "Eddy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rik Mayall played Richard Richard (aka Richie) you silly begger. Adrian Edmondson played Edward Hitler (aka Eddie).

  132. Firefly DVDs by CeramicNuts · · Score: 1
    We're less than 30 days until the Firefly DVDs hit the shelves ... then, of course the movie ... and the inevitable and triumphal return to TV!

    If you're a Firefly fan, you should check out this guy's website. He just finished 2 DVDs of commentary on the show for his Masters degree project.

  133. yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watch family guy just about everday on Adult Swim. I never knew it was such a big success though, noone I know seems to have ever heard about it. Sweet news..

  134. STEWIE!!! by glenebob · · Score: 1

    I'd be happy with a radio show of Stewie just saying stuff. Anything. Can't get enough of that evil little bastard.

    Better yet, the Stewie and Brian show. Who needs Howard Stern?

    1. Re:STEWIE!!! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Hey, Stewie's not evil. He's just ... differently motivated!

      I'd definitely go for a Stewie show. The rest of the characters are pretty much a waste of time except as subjects for Stewie's plots. They _really_ need to concentrate more on Stewie this time around.

      "Yes, I _would_ like some ice cream. But NO SPRINKLES! For every sprinkle I find ... I SHALL KILL YOU!"
      - Stewie

    2. Re:STEWIE!!! by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      The rest of the characters are pretty much a waste of time except as subjects for Stewie's plots.

      you LIE. megan is my ideal girl, i swear. she's perfect.

  135. here's to hard drinking dogs ... by freecell_wizard · · Score: 1

    I love it when Brian the dog says stuff like "Make me a vodka stinger with a whiskey back, and step on it!" :-p I'm zipping through the DVDs fast and loving it. Far better than any Simpsons past season 7 (IMO the old Simpson episode guide ends about when the series gets bad). I'm chuckling thinking about when they inherit the mansion and Stewie tormets the servants, especially when he orders two of them to fight to the death for his amusement *lol*

    1. Re:here's to hard drinking dogs ... by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Fetch me an ice cream. And none of those damn sprinkles! For every sprinkle I find, I KILL YOU.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    2. Re:here's to hard drinking dogs ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Do they play the cool Star Trek hand-to-hand combat music?

      The Simpsons had a great scene in their "Homer Averagenaut" episode. Barney and Homer are made to fight with the whole Star Trek getup. One trainer comments to another "I bet twenty quantros on the newcomer".

      Hilarious stuff!!!!

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  136. Re:Buck Fush: +1, Patriotic by mek2600 · · Score: 1

    Actually, the important question is (was) "will they ever bring back Family Guy". Now that that one's been answered we can move on to the less important question like the one you mentioned.

  137. Adult Swim new linup? by i_m_sane · · Score: 1

    I keep seeing these ads for a new line up on adult swim, with shows that in my opinion do not match FG.

    Has anyone else heard about these?

    --
    Adam Sane sanity is a dirty job, but somebody has to do it.
  138. WOOHOO by Namaseit · · Score: 1

    CAN I GET A HELL YEAH!!

    --
    75% of all statistics are made up!
  139. Family Guy King of the Hill by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 1

    How is King of the Hill still on the air and Family Guy not? I've never once heard someone cheer when King of the Hill starts, mostly i just hear groans. But Family Guy is guaranteed to bring enjoyment simply at the start of the title song.

  140. On the subject of cool shows fox killed... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    I miss Fastlane, which lasted all of a season on FOX, and I was really disappointed when I found out it had been cancelled. It had cool special effects, good music, and decent plots. It was total escapist TV, but it was GOOD escapist TV. Like Futurama, Family Guy, Greg the Bunny, and a ton of other FOX shows, they moved it around and took it off and on until everyone forgot about it.

  141. Swing and a miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nope, that one wasn't even remotely funny. go back to whacking off to thehun.net, you failed karma whore you

  142. Contact Fox and Tell them to Bring it Back by JT_Palmer · · Score: 1

    Here is the contact E-Mail askfox@foxinc.com ================== Bring Back the Best Animated Cartoon!!!! (after the Simpsons, of course)

  143. FOR BEST RESULTS REMOVE HEAD FROM ASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why am I willing to bet that you have a bowel movement about twice a week?

  144. Someone from Fox go poke the assholes at SciFi by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

    If Fox (fucking Fox ) can figure out that they made a mistake and bring back Family Guy after cancelling it, then maybe, just maybe, the SciFi idiots can finally pay for the fifth season of Farscape they promised.

    I've bought each and every boxed season set of Farscape so far... where's my goddamn fix?

    --
    This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
    1. Re:Someone from Fox go poke the assholes at SciFi by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

      And so I browse at 1 and see mentions of Farscape coming back after all... missed the slashdot story because it was on my birthday.

      The universe plays some funny goddamn tricks on me.

      happy birthday to me!

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
    2. Re:Someone from Fox go poke the assholes at SciFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's my birthday a few hours, and a friend of mine has hers the day after. If I wasn't getting so damn old I'd be yelling 'hoooray for birthdays' right now.

    3. Re:Someone from Fox go poke the assholes at SciFi by Hassman · · Score: 1

      See, there is a difference:
      Famliy Guy - Good, fresh TV show.
      Farscape - shit.

      That was a hard concept, so let's review:
      Family Guy = Good
      Farscape = the shit i poop out after eating taco bell.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    4. Re:Someone from Fox go poke the assholes at SciFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I inspected your taco bell shit, and apart from a surprisingly close resemblance to your mother, I couldn't find anything as original or interesting as Farscape.

    5. Re:Someone from Fox go poke the assholes at SciFi by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Yea, this is coming from the guy who probalby thought that crystal pepsi was god's gift to humanity. Your thoughts and ideas are null and void my friend.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    6. Re:Someone from Fox go poke the assholes at SciFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you seem pretty practiced at making an idiot of yourself... any pointers? I mean, ad hominem attacks only work when you have some clue about the person you're attacking...

      Do you apply your logic-less 'thought' process to things like watching Farscape as well? If so, it's easy to see why you don't like it.

  145. YES!!!! by Palin · · Score: 1

    Yes! I was just watching Family Guy last night on Adult Swim and was thinking that new episodes would be so cool!

    --
    Palin...
  146. DVD availability gives you a vote by geekee · · Score: 1

    The availability of tv series on dvd has a nice side effect in that by buying the dvd, you're casting a vote with your money that you like the show, which probably translates a lot better into profit than if you simply watched the show on tv (and the ads). Therefore, a smaller segment of the population can now keep a show going if they're willing to buy it on dvd. This works particularly well for cartoons, since you don't need to worry about aging actors as much (only voices). As more people purchase DVR's and stop watching ads, this may make the television market more like the radio market in the sense that show producers will use broadcast tv to sample a show to the public in an effort to sell dvds, much like music producers use radio airplay to get people to buy cds.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  147. Extending the logic... by TastelessGarbage · · Score: 1
    I'd like to see the response if The Tick (cartoon, not Warburton & co.) was ever released on DVD. I know, everyone has moved on to other projects, but when *is* this going to become available?

    Yeah, I know I can download it, but a hi-res version would certainly sell.

    --------------------

    --
    That ain't liver; that's beef kidney!
    1. Re:Extending the logic... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      The Tick ROCKED. This would make an excellent addition to Adult Swim!!!!

      My favorite episode is when they follow the normally useless Sewer-Shark into his realm. Here he is all powerful and the Tick's powers fail him.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  148. YHBT. YHL. HAND. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  149. mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because he's made of only genuine interociter parts!

  150. Fuck You Fox! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fucked it all up.
    Family Guy is dead.
    You can't fucking resurrect it simply because it will make YOU more cash.

    1. Re:Fuck You Fox! by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Bull shit. It ain't dead. I watch it every day on Cartoon Network. There is talk of a movie deal that the execs at Cartoon Network are working for ... it's golden.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    2. Re:Fuck You Fox! by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I think Peter and the rest of the 'Family Guy' gang would be perfectly happy whorring for cash. That what makes them the perfect show for Fox ;-)

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  151. Banned Episode by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    it's about Peter getting into financial trouble and making a wish for a Jew to come save him, because he thinks all Jewish people are financial geniuses. I thought it was relatively tame compared to some of the other things they've done, particularly the "Special People's Games" episode.

    How many studios are owned by "special people"?
    How many by jews?

    Also applies to the number of movies about how the nazis killed Jews as opposed to the number of movies about how the nazis killed gypsies: Not many gypsie movie makers...

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Banned Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Jews" don't own the major studios, the shareholders do. Perhaps you meant "run", but that'd be a stretch too. I'm guessing you're just an antisemitic shit head.

    2. Re:Banned Episode by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      Also applies to the number of movies about how the nazis killed Jews as opposed to the number of movies about how the nazis killed gypsies: Not many gypsie movie makers...

      So you are trying to logically conclude that "The Jews" censored the family guy based upon your "data" point that there are more Jewish/Holocaust movies (that YOU know about, at least) vs. Gypsy/Holocaust movies?

      Oh wait, it must be true. Seth Green is a Jew, and he does the voice for Chris. Yeah, and he plays Scott Evil. Yeah, another proof that Jews are trying to control the world, and put laser beams on sharks to boot.

    3. Re:Banned Episode by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      How many studios are owned by "special people"?
      How many by jews?


      Can you name even one of these nefarious Jew-controlled TV studios?

      Of course not. You're too "special".

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    4. Re:Banned Episode by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      So you are trying to logically conclude that "The Jews" censored the family guy based upon your "data" point that there are more Jewish/Holocaust movies (that YOU know about, at least) vs. Gypsy/Holocaust movies?

      Your grasp of logic is obviously etherial at best. You missed my point entirely and went into a very predictable troll. Don't.

      Oh wait, it must be true. Seth Green is a Jew

      Fascinating, yet totally unrellevant.

      Yeah, and he plays Scott Evil. Yeah, another proof that Jews are trying to control the world

      Whatever you say...

      and put laser beams on sharks to boot.

      Now come on! Everyone wants to do that, why are you making this laser shark issue a religion/race issue? You have problems man.

      Now back to my point, because even though you have demonstrated in your post an severe lack of intelligence, I'll still clarify, just in case your dim wittedness is light and can let this notion penetrate through your deep layers of prefabricated troll reflexes.

      The person I was responding too pointed out that a show about how Peter Griffin has preconcieved notions about persons of the jewish race/religion and their supposed inate facility with economics was censored, while a show that was equally offensive to people with handicaps wasn't. This confused him. I helpfully pointed out that for censorship to be applied, someone in a position of power must make a decision to use that power to actively censor the product in question. In this case, there are far more people in positions of power in the entertainment industry that are likely to take personnal offense at jest mentioning jews than there are that would at jest mentioning people with handicaps.

      Of course, you do not posses the emotional and intellectual capacities required to understand this, all you are able to do is launch yourself in an fit about what people other than me might have said at some point that sounded vaguely like what I said. Your inability to actually understand what I wrote was sad. You, and the innumerrable masses of people like you, should learn to think before you talk/type. Of course, you would first have to learn to think...baby steps I guess.

      In the mean time, keep quiet.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Banned Episode by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Can you name even one of these nefarious Jew-controlled TV studios?

      Warner Bros.

      Of course not. You're too "special".

      Well, you are the one that reads, and quotes, the word "owned", and then translates that into "nefarious controll"...

      I am special: I can actually talk about sensitive subjects without relying on what I've been told to think by others, a rare gift.
      And unlike you, my dull friend, I can talk about them without being blinded by emotionally potent oversimplifications.

      If you think that there are no owners of TV studios that are of jewish denominations, you are simply ignorant. A bit of research can solve that.

      On the other hand, if you believe that people in positions of power never misuse that power for small minded and short sighted reasons, than you are an idiot...I'm affraid that's much harder to solve.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  152. Let us not forget The State by Dragon218 · · Score: 1

    This was one of the best shows on MTV... EVER!

    --

    "It's the little touches that make a future solid enough to be destroyed" --William S. Bourroughs
  153. *GASP* by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    does this mean fox will stop cancelling quality shows now?

  154. haha awesome by syrinx · · Score: 1

    "Oh my God, Brian, there's a message in my Alpha-Bits! It says 'Oooooooo'!"

    "Peter, those are Cheerios."

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  155. from the article: by AnonymousCowheart · · Score: 1

    "called the series a late-blooming phenomenon that may have aired before its time"
    Might just be the people I've talked to, but I've never met someone whose watched the show, and didn't think it was hilarious! The thing that people always say is "why was it cancelled?"

  156. They better....or I'll get sarcastic! by DrDoombender · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or has TV been a major dissapointment these last few years. Family Guy has been one of those gems that has actually brought me back to the tv (or PC in the case of the DVDS). I think it would be a huge mistake for Fox not to give the green light for more eps. In either case here are my favorite episodes:

    1) And the weiner is
    2) The thin white line
    3) Brian does hollywood
    4) Peter Griffin: Husband, father....brother?
    5) He's too sexy for his fat
    6) E Peterbus unum
    7) Family Guy viewer mail #1
    8) If I'm dyin, I'm lyin
    9) I am peter hear me roar
    10) Da Boom

    but anyway, let's face it there are lots more
    funny eps. of family guy (and some lame one's too). All I know is that the brand of humor that Chris McFarlan brings is a welcomed change to humdrum tv.

  157. Fuck this queerness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When 90% of the jokes are WACKY CUTAWAYS to things that have absolutely no bearing at all on the overall storyline and aren't even funny to begin with (as soon as someone says "this is worse than that time I..." you know exactly what's coming and the actual cutaway becomes redundant), that's not a TV show anymore, what you've got there is a steaming pile of shit.

  158. what's your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  159. "Family Guy" Movie?! by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 1
    I went to IMDB to look up some Family Guy stuff, and tripped over this alleged Family Guy Movie. No other data tho.

    Crispin
    ----
    Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
    Chief Scientist, Immunix Inc.

  160. Note: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get porn on cable.

  161. Victory is mine! by Rockenreno · · Score: 1

    Well, it looks like FOX has finally began to rue the day they took Family Guy off the air. Hopefully we will once again be viewing Stewie's childlike antics and crazy schemes. good... good...

    --

    Forecast for tomorrow: A few sprinklings of genius with a chance of DOOM!
  162. Fox doesn't deserve Family Guy by emkman · · Score: 1

    It was one of the funniest cartoons ever, and they dicked it around. Cancelled it, brought it back. Now its on tuesdays, no now its wednesdays. You could barely catch an episode. And then they wouldnt air When You Wish Upon a Weinstein season finale because it was too offensive. Cartoon Network aired it though. Screw Fox. Bring the new episodes right to Cartoon Network where they belong. The only downside is people without cable will miss out. But I still think its the right thing to do.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
    1. Re:Fox doesn't deserve Family Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only downside is people without cable will miss out.

      Thats what Usenet is for, silly.

  163. Gasp!? by GooberToo · · Score: 1

    What, you mean the rating system they used was completely worthless? What? You mean that Fox destroyed their own show? What? You mean that in spite of Fox being incompetent, they've had absolutely wonderful shows? What? You mean Futurama? Family Guy? didn't suck?

    The executives at Fox are brain dead.

    P.S. For the record, I tried watching that horrible show called Firefly. On the rare occation that I was able to watch it, in spite of Fox's best efforts, I must say, the show was horrible! I'm sorry, but cowboys in space is stupid. Seems I stand corrected. Fox actually did something right! Go figure.

    I know some people went crazy over that show...why? Help me out here? Everything I saw was bad writing, bad stories, and hoakie anachronisms in space. I really enjoy good sci-fi. And generally, I can watch just about anything. Will someone please fill me in on what they thought was good about that horrible show? Please? I feel like I'm missing something....but my brain says I'm not.

  164. Die Family Guy DIEEEE! by Teahouse · · Score: 0, Troll

    It seems to today
    All you see
    Are crappy shows on Fox
    That are not TV

    So where the hell are those
    Special programs
    We used to watch all the time?

    Regurgitate the Family Guy
    They rip off the Simpsons
    Wonder which producer
    Is sucking Rupert Murdoch's
    big ol fly

    The suck-y Fam-ily GUY!!!!

    This show is like a vampire. No one seems to be able to put the friggin wooden steak into it's heart! Cancelled Futurama and The Critic, but someone there LOVES this stale piece of crap.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
    1. Re:Die Family Guy DIEEEE! by Teahouse · · Score: 1

      I guess there are a lot of losers who believe that, I was modded down by you guys because I think the show stinks. How petulant.

      --
      "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  165. My favorite Stewie line was... by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

    Stewie was dealing with a bully from the neighborhood in his own megalomaniacal way, capturing the bully and tying him up in the basement.

    Lois looks down the stairs...

    "Stewie, what are you doing down there?"

    "We're playing house, Mother..."

    "But why is that boy all tied up?"

    "Um... Roman Polanski's house."

    Now that's funny.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  166. Oh please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reruns are much better than the new shows, even
    if you watch them several times (the reruns that is).

    1. Re:Oh please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old episodes were good, what I was trying to say is they ran out of ideas, every episode for the past 5 years has basically been the same. Theres nothing exciting or new

  167. Was no one else enraged by the BS? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    To quote the article:
    But ratings faded, and the show ended with a whimper early last year.


    Didn't this article enrage anyone else? Ok, perhaps enrage is a bit strong of a word... but it sure chaps my hide when networks say total bullshit like this.

    Ratings faded? What the hell are they talking about? Everyone I know and over heard speaking about Family Guy loved it. I've never heard anyone say they didn't like it, if they had seen it and actually watched a full episode or two.

    The people they get to define their "ratings" really piss me off. Trailer park, white trash, Rossane Barr watching morons are the aparent demographic of Fox and most other networks. I know I'm not saying anything new to anyone here... but it still pisses me off. They cancle all the good shows (John Doe, Fire Fly, Family Guy, etc...) but they leave the dross on TV? I mean really... who the F*ck wants to watch stupid shows like "The OC" or "A minute with Stan Hooper" or... wait! Better yet, lets watch "Joe Millionaire."

    F*ck you Fox. I'm going to go set my Tivo so I can skip your commercials and watch the few shows I do watch ('70's show!) on your network, all the while, I will be laughing like a pirate, because I am leeching off your bread and butter while not giving any payback. Yes... I will be essentially pirating your shows, because I don't watch your commericials to fund more stupid, mindless, moronic shows.

    HO HO HAR! And a bottle of RUM matey! I feel righteous in my TIVOISTAISM! Stick it to the man!

    Ok, I'm done now... but seriously. Who the hell are the demographic audenience that Fox uses to gauge whether a show is good or not? Because it sure as hell isn't *educated* white or black America.

    1. Re:Was no one else enraged by the BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've never heard anyone say they didn't like it, if they had seen it and actually watched a full episode or two.
      I've seen every episode (not much else on at 10:30) and I think it's fucking terrible. All your friends must be idiots.
  168. No, no! by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    Buy a futurama DVD!

    Oh wait we all already have them.

    --
    Everything seemed to be going so nice
    'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
  169. I now believe that... by prabhath · · Score: 1

    there is a god :) my favorite scene is definetely when Peter hits the golf ball into the china shop and the bull is standing there as everything gets destroyed!! "wait, i know what you're thinking.." ah, what perfection!

  170. Re: Your KID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this was a joke, but once again, a fine example of adults perceiving cartoons as "kids fare".

  171. Re:Buck Fush: +1, Patriotic by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    MAKE THE PIE HIGHER
    by George W. Bush

    I think we all agree, the past is over.
    This is still a dangerous world.
    It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mental losses.

    Rarely is the question asked Is our children learning?
    Will the highways of the internet become more few?

    How many hands have I shaked?
    They misunderestimate me.
    I am a pitbull on the pantleg of opportunity.

    I know that the human being and the fish can coexist.
    Families is where our nation finds hope, where our wings take dream.
    Put food on your family!
    Knock down the tollbooth!
    Vulcanize Society!
    Make the pie higher! Make the pie higher!

  172. Return to the Source by ear2ground · · Score: 1

    "Family Guy - The Revolution"

    --
    Subduction leads to orogeny
  173. Family guy Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just to let you know Family guy costs about 1-1.3 million an epsioid.
    But for FOX to put the show on the air the best thing you can do is to buy both dvd sets. That is the only reason why they are considering bringing it back!!!

    1. Re:Family guy Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just to let you know Family guy costs about 1-1.3 million an epsioid.
      What a tragic waste. That's about the same cost as an episode of Futurama. We could be getting 35 new episodes of that instead, but we won't, because Fox is staffed entirely by morons.
    2. Re:Family guy Price by Black+Hitler · · Score: 1

      I think an episode of Futurama costs about $2 million. Or at least that's how much it was costing when they pulled the plug. So that's about 17 1/2 episodes of Futurama, which in all honesty would still be preferable.

    3. Re:Family guy Price by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      I've been looking at how much people pay for things lately, and it's become obvious that the amount of resource the world wastes is staggering, but...

      What could they possibly spend a million dollars on, drawing a cartoon? I know I'm hopelessly naive, but isn't this just a few funny writers, a couple of voice talents and a bunch of animators, along with voice and sound guys? 20 people, if it was an efficient and multitasking group, 50 if they really push the envelope of laziness?

      Figure the ridiculous, that everyone's making a hundred grand, and they do one show a week. Even assuming some heavy (reusable) equipment and physical plant, some legal fees... I can't see how they could they possibly spend a million dollars a month - let alone an episode...

      I'm sure I'm wrong on lots of my assumptions here - I'm just wondering which ones. Where is that million budgeted?

    4. Re:Family guy Price by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1

      Well, for starters, they don't do an episode a week. It takes a lot longer than that to create 22 minutes of animation. Even if we figure that the show goes at half the NTSC fps of ~30, that's still 15*60*22 = 19,800 frames to draw. That takes a lot of people to put together.

      I think that the figure quoted (we all were watching Adult Swim that night, I see) is the whole cost, which means it includes things like the cost of the studio, electricity, data connectivity, sound studio, food, parking, shipping, and telephones. The show is digital ink&paint, I assume, so there are who knows how many high-end workstations, OS licenses (they're probably not on linux), application licenses, file servers, print servers, and they probably have a big expensive machine that spits final frames out to some sort of professional display format.

      So if we assume they put together 22 seasons in one year, that's around $25 million to cover those costs annually. Count the names on the closing credits, plus the costs from the above paragraph, plus licensing costs whenever they use something that requires royalties, plus some other miscellaneous costs, and that is how each episode checks in at over $1 million. And if it still seems high, well, Seth McFarlane deserves big honkin' piles of money for what he's come up with.

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  174. Re: Your KID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uhh it was the plot of a Family Guy episode

  175. I'm a Jew and I wasn't offended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I laughed too cause Family Guy is hilarious

  176. Sigh. by JKConsult · · Score: 1
    For some insane reason it was ruled that the FCC can effectively censor broadcast television.

    I guess I'll take the bait on what I'd call a 50 percent chance of flamebait. The "insane reason" that the FCC is allowed to censor broadcast television is that the frequencies are ours. NBC doesn't own the rights to their frequency. We gave it to them.

    In return for giving it to them, we require some things. We require that they follow "common decency", which, as you'll note, changes. Lucy and Ricky, Rob and Laura, and countless other couples weren't allowed to share a bed because a plurality of people thought that was improper. You couldn't see Al Bundy on the toilet, and for that matter, the toilet flushing on "All In the Family" was controversial. When things become mainstream, usually through the efforts of some or another groundbreaking show getting away with it, everybody is allowed to do it.

    We also require that stations slot a certain amount of time to public service announcements (PSAs). We require time for news, and we require time for matters of national interest, like the State of the Union. We require programs that are suitable for children to watch to be aired when children might be watching.

    If you think requirements like these are "insane", then I'll call you what you are: an idiot. Sure, we all disagree with some of the FCC's rulings. Many of us think that the "7 Dirty Words" that George Carlin referenced are words that every child above the age of 10 has heard. But as bad as primetime TV is, imagine a world with no FCC regulations on what can and can't be aired over public airwaves. The FCC has a very good reason for what they do, even if they're misguided at times.

    1. Re:Sigh. by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      The example you gave about couples not being allowed to share a bed (they could if one couple had a foot on the floor) was NOT an FCC restriction. It was a restriction imposed and enforced by the broadcasters themselves. It is this kind of self-policing that we are sorely missing today.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    2. Re:Sigh. by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Well, part of the problem involved here is that the FCC is not an elected body subject to civilian oversight. Yes, the judicial system gave them this power, but now they're the ones in control. Much the same as most censorship in America (the MPAA ratings for example) it is carried out by people not accountable to the voters and then later enforced typically by private businesses. Occasionally government will legislate based on these decisions as well.

      As for a world without these regulations? Well... look at other forms of media. Actually, let's look at film first. I've noticed the recent trend of Spike tv to show movies uncut (or so they advertise at least) acknowledging that people who want to see the film, want to see it without added censorship. A film starting at 9pm on cable really has no reason to be censored and I suspect that the majority of viewers would prefer that it wasn't.

      Anyhow, other media. What about books? Nobody regulates books (which anyone can check out) and whenever someone tries to remove books from libaries or otherwise regulate them they catch seven different styles of hell. Moving out a little bit further let's look at comics. Many comics companies have since thrown off the shackle of the comics code (IIRC DC and Archie are the only companies that still use it, and DC only for some of the DC Universe stuff) and DC's Vertigo imprint in particular has been revolutionary for the production of work for mature readers. By and large almost all mature readers titles are some of the best work coming out (Sandman, Preacher, Transmetropolitan, 100 Bullets, Fables, and Y:The Last Man are all Vertigo titles). It's simply the matter of being able to handle mature themes, have a bit of blood if needed, show a little skin, and let characters speak like normal people.

      I think the greatest problem here is that some people want the world walled off into a playground for their children and are not willing to accept that the rest of the world simply are not children and do not wish to behave like them.

      The more important issue here though is that the FCC is acting beyond what they probably should. While some of their regulations are reasonable (time alloted for broadcasts of national importance) some other may not be so. The social contract with the FCC you cite might certainly be valid, except it was forced on the population. There is no oversight and no recourse against most of these decisions by the public. We have never given them the right to regulate the airwaves, rather they have taken them and often to use them against our wishes.

    3. Re:Sigh. by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      The problem is by making and distributing your film or book you are not interfering with the distribution of other films or books asside from market forces. Meanwhile, with broadcast, if you decided to put up a tranmitter and start broadcasting your broadcast would physically interfer with other broadcasts in that range in that area. With AM, which is all that there was when the FCC was created, the signals being transmitted could have an impact on a national, if not global, scale. The call for regulation originated with the broadcasters themselves because of the interference that was being produced and it's why an entity such as the FCC is necessary.

      Now, once you recognize radio frequencies as a resource that needs a government entity to manage it, putting in a requirement that broadcasters serve the public interest is not that much furthur off the mark.

      Now, beyond that I agree with you. Congress has no right under the Constitution to delegate its lawmaking authority to another entity. You would think that with the necessity for regulation an amendment could have been crafted with 3/4ths of the states agreeing to it. In addition, with shorter-range airwave broadcasts, such as FM, it might even be possible for the individual states to regulate themselves with only conflicts being handled by the FCC (this would, however, do little for many New England states which would still have to rely on the FCC). With things such as cable CERTAINLY regulation should be up to the individual states (those cable lines are going over public land).

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    4. Re:Sigh. by Belgand · · Score: 1

      I think the problem here is a matter of spectrum utilization being mixed up with content regulation. One is sensible enough to be regulated fairly. The other, however, should not be glommed on as well.

      Content regulation should, at best, be done by the individual publisher. Sadly, even in those cases you get people afraid to offend anyone with anything and losing precious advertising money.

      As for the FCC regulating the airwaves, they've more or less done an adequate job of it. There have been some questionable moves, but they've basically done a pretty good job. Content regulation though is the issue of importance I feel and should be quite clearly be taken away from them.

  177. DarkAngel OT by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Firefly sucked compared to what it replaced. Dark Angel was better. WAY better then Firefly.

    Man, you gotta be drunk!

    You mean the post apocalyptic show where a giant EMP destroyed all electronics/civilisation and EVERYONE has a pager? Computers all over the place? That show?

    Where "old run down technology" is a brand new SUV with mud smudged on it?

    Where they had "original" characters like freakin' Vincent from that 80's Beauty and the Beast show? He looked exactly like him had the same damn personality and the same powers! (Yeah, the beast is really a big softy, REALLY original!)

    And don't forget, cat DNA means you can jump 20 feet in the air! It sure does!

    Oh, and the hot star goes in heat...real classy.

    What else...hey, her borrowed-womd mother looked exactly like her! Even though she had 0 relation to the baby she was carrying (not her egg)!

    Dark Angel was cheap crap. It was the movie Soldier made into a TV show, with a weaker storyline and a hot chick to compensate for the total lack of originality, effort, logic, or good sci-fi. It was a festival of cliches and borrowed ideas, badly executed.

    BUT, The star was hot. Really hot.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:DarkAngel OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that Dark Angel had HIGHER ratings then Firefly?

    2. Re:DarkAngel OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefly was poo. It was Cowboys and Indians in space attempting to look like cowboys and indians. I mean really....wild west wear....on a space ship?? What WERE they thinking? The only reason it got much attention was because Joss Whedon had alot of followers with Buffy. Oh does anyone remember the original Buffy movie? With Paul Reubans, Kristy Swanson and Luke Perry? He wrote that too and it was completely different, to me, then the show was. It also sucked, in it's own way. Granted, Joss did have some successes, but name ONE TV series he has a hand in that is still running? Any? Not including repeats?? Thank you. Also, you don't seem to know much about EMP. EMP CAN destroy electronics...that are in operation. EMP can also be shielded against and also if the designs for the pagers, transmittal towers and the like can and probably are also printed on paper.

      Dark Angel also had..ratings. Maybe not as high as Fox would have liked, but they were higher then what replaced it. Maybe they thought by adding wild west stuff to a scifi series would make it more believable? Yeah right.

  178. Liar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't modify posts in the same thread you comment in.

  179. Bought the DVDs by TechniMyoko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Makes me glad I bought both boxed sets (and the XBOX dvd player kit)

    1. Re:Bought the DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mods on crack. why is this interesting?

  180. Free Tibet! by tarun2701 · · Score: 0

    Demonstrators: Free Tibet. free Tibet. Peter: I'll take it. Hello China? I have something you want but it's gonna cost you. yeah that's right. All the tea. I love this show! My favorite character has to be Stewie. Stewie: You! Cut my bread! [waiter cuts his bread] Stewie: Now cut my milk! Waiter: Uh, sir, it's liquid. Stewie: [slaps him] IDIOT! Freeze it, then CUT it! And if you ever question my authority again, I shall give you diaper duty! And believe me, I will not make it easy on you. The great thing about Stewie is that even though he's bent on world domination he still acts like a baby. Remember the end of the episode "A Road to Europe?" Anyway, another reason FG may have been cancelled: From Eonline.com The series was also the target of an advertiser boycott instigated by MacFarlane's former prep school headmaster, the Reverend Richardson Schell. Schell convinced several advertisers to abandon the 'toon, alleging that it contained anti-Semitic, racist and sexist content. Schell had previously asked MacFarlane to change the cartoon family's surname. Griffin was the same last name as that of Schell's assistant, Elaine Griffin. More than 125,000 fans fired back with their own online petition announcing their intention to boycott the network and its advertisers if the series was canceled, all to no avail. You can see the full article here

  181. Seven dirty words. by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    Shit, Piss, Fuck, Cunt, Cocksucker, Motherfucker, and Tits.

    My god a world where TV stars swore just as bad as mommy and daddy. That would be terrible.

    Despite all the prohibitions of the FCC, people seemingly have been using these words since well before radio. They are making things worse because they make these words seem more taboo then they actually are.

    Seriously, Tits!!!! As in, tits on a cow. Oops, did that make it worse????

    I know that some people object to those words. I myself recoil from them. But deep down I realize that this is simply cultural conditioning. To somehow think that we are above and beyond Shit, Piss, Fuck, Cunt, Cocksucker, Motherfucker, and Tits is kinda silly.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  182. Re:FAMILY GUY - THE EPITOME OF AMERICAN CULTURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

    Sincerely,
    America

  183. Family Guy Bittorrents! by miguel_at_menino.com · · Score: 1

    Where can we get these family guy episodes that everybody's talking about?

    1. Re:Family Guy Bittorrents! by KingDaveRa · · Score: 1

      By visiting your local DVD emporium and purchasing it on DVD.

      Its quite simple.

  184. Obligatory celebration reference... by KilljoyX · · Score: 1

    Am I... Am I supposed to celebrate with my penis?

  185. Good and Bad of Family Guy. by Japanese+Dad · · Score: 1

    Good: As mentioned, when it's on, the laugh-per-minute meter is untouchable. It does blend low and high-culture very well, taking shots at everything and not being pretentious or sleazy. Bad: Frankly, the show can be creepy if you watch quite a few in a row. The stuff between Stewie and Lois is always threatening to cross the line, and the show is very nihilistic overall. If you are a big Simpsons fan, you're going to be annoyed at all of the characters, gags and situations that were lifted wholesale from that show. Unlike the Simpsons, Family Guy never had the chance/desire to give the characters any depth so if the rapidfire gags aren't working, the shows tend to bomb pretty hard.

  186. M*A*S*H by justzisguy · · Score: 1

    That's great news. If FOX can do that for Family Guy, how about the old favorite M*A*S*H?!? Of course they'd have to do it all CGI, but it could happen... :-D

  187. And even funnier.. by wackybrit · · Score: 1

    is that as soon as you posted here, your moderation on that post was deducted!

  188. Re:FAMILY GUY - THE EPITOME OF AMERICAN CULTURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a non-American, I actually find that Family Guy manages to make some intelligent jokes and sly references to modern culture that most Americans shows could only dream of doing.

  189. Potential viewers by ocie · · Score: 1

    With all the DVD copying around, that $1m in sales probably translates to 1 or 2 million potential viewers.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  190. One of the biggest mistakes in TV history, fixed? by billyradcliffe · · Score: 1

    Canceling the Family Guy has to be one of the biggest mistakes in TV history. At the same time, placing it at 8PM on Thursdays up against *FRIENDS* of all shows (which happens to be the #1 rated show as far as viewers go) has to be another one of the biggest mistakes. Even then, it clocked in about 5 million viewers, which is about enough to keep it going, as some other shows FOX kept around had those sort of ratings (I mean come on, 5 million when you're against Friends' 22 million ain't bad).

    Family Guy is, without a doubt, one of the best animated comedies (one of the best comedies, period) that has ever graced television. It is consistently funny, and has a unique style of humor that can't be found in any other show. I happen to work at a video rental store, and whenever we play a Family Guy DVD, most people comment on how great the show is. The majority of those people also have never even seen and/or heard of the show until it came to Cartoon Network. Go figure. I would be extatic if Family Guy came back with new episodes.

  191. Swweet! by minasoko · · Score: 1

    Damn, I'm so late to this thread.
    I had to post to say how excellent Family Guy is. I don't think any other TV show has made me laugh so hard and so consistently.

    It's never been broadcast domestically here in the UK, but all I needed was to see 2 or 3 episodes and I bought all 3 seasons on DVD. If they do commission even 1 more season, I'll be a happy bloke.

    Favourite scene? Too many to remember, but Death cracks me up when he tries to drive home drunk. Goes something like this:

    [Death staggers out of a bar and gets into his car. Takes a deep breath.]

    Death: C'mon Death, you can do this.

    [Pulls out directly into the side of a stationary police patrol car.]

  192. Re:It all makes sense now by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

    My god, man, how many more years of the Korean War do you need? The show lasted four times longer than the actual war in the first place.

    --

    I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  193. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I hope that exec gets slapped and sterilized.

    Personally, I'd prefer if he got sacked.

  194. Scripts by O.M.A.C. · · Score: 0

    Let's just hope that they develop some scripts that are on par with the first season. The last time I saw a new episode of FG, it was pretty much a repetition of old Stewie material. Not that the character isn't funny, but you can't just have Stewie trying to shoot everyone with a laser every show and expect that to be a fan pleasing season of the show. I still watch the old episodes on Cartoon Network, so I have to hope that they bring back an entertaining Family Guy.

    --
    /* It's amazing the damage someone with a stunted sense of humor and mod points can do to your karma. */
  195. Comedy+pathos=good writing by edremy · · Score: 1
    Exactly: I damn near cried at the end of Jurassic Bark. Being able to pull that off in a slapstick comedy is a sign of really good writing.

    Another great example: watch the final episode of Blackadder sometime. You don't even notice the transition from a comedy mostly about farting and eating boiled rats to something truly sad until it's over.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  196. Firefly - how dumb is that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sci-Fi, spaceships, cowboys, regular guns?

    Are you on dope?

    I'll invent a crappy show of the same type, right here. Here we go:

    Pan-dimensionnal beings who wack people on the head for no apparent reason.

    Oh wait...

  197. Lol, here's my favorite by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Beginning of episode (I can never remember which one) stewie is rifling through the fridge, suddenly he see's what he's looking for and says "Great! Sunny-D!". I almost cried I was laughing so hard. It's the little things that make Family Guy a VERY close second to the simpsons. I own both DVD sets and they are awesome, watching McWhateverhisnameis do the voices is hilarious. Plus you cannot beat Mila Kunis (?sp) replacing the original Meg. I wonder why?

  198. Now i feel bad... by putch · · Score: 1

    ...for downloading the dvd rips. gonna go buy the dvd's tonight. perhaps even the futurama dvds (yeah i downloadeds those too).

    this is the best reason i've ever heard to not download!

    --
    just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
  199. OK, that's one ... by ChodaBoy · · Score: 1

    Now if they could just bring back Firefly and Futurama I'd be very happy.

    --
    ChodaBoy
    - The preceding statement is the product of a deranged mind and the sole property of the voices in my head.
  200. Re:Wow, back on Fox?...Nooooo by acerteng · · Score: 1

    Hopefully not Fox...keep it on CN where we can enjoy the show as it was intended...I fear that Fox will force the creators to tone it down...you can't beat scenes in episodes like "Death is a bitch" where Peter tells Death (Norm Macdonald) that he was on the Junior Varsity track team and Death says "I caught Flo Jo"...hilarious albeit morbid...that was the moment I got hooked to FG.

  201. What about Futurama.... by VonSnaggle · · Score: 1

    What about Futurama....

    I would love for Futurama to make a comeback, a better timeslot might help it's ratings also...

    --
    if common sense was common, wouldn't everyone have it?
  202. aired before it's time by ectoraige · · Score: 1

    Fox Television Entertainment Group chairman Sandy Grushow said a decision is expected soon and called the series a late-blooming phenomenon that may have aired before its time.

    And after it's time, but never aired *at* it's scheduled time...

    --
    Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, ybt bss abj. Tb bhgfvqr. Syl n xvgr.
  203. Why on Earth is King Of The Hill still on the air? by Sabu+mark · · Score: 1

    Denis Leary or someone had a bit that went as follows:
    JFK: Dead. Robert F. Kennedy: Dead. Ted Kennedy: Still alive. WHY, GOD, WHY?

    And I can't help but notice:
    Futurama: Canceled. Family Guy: Canceled. King Of The Hill is entering its seventh goddamn season - WHY, GOD, WHY???

    I have never understood why King Of The Hill is still on the air. Watching the Simpsons end and King Of The Hill begin is like leaving Disney World and walking across the street to a wake. Fox is stupid. They don't deserve the new Family Guy episodes. Put them on Comedy Central where the executives know gold when they see it. Here's a time-traveling thought experiment: Put Family Guy between the Simpsons and X-Files on Sundays, and instead move King Of The Hill to a different weeknight every three weeks like they did with Family Guy, and then see whether people even remember King Of The Hill these days, let alone buy a million four-DVD sets of it.

    --

    What Would Jesus Do
    (for a Klondike bar)?
  204. Gynocracy by insanechemist · · Score: 1

    One of the few shows that teaches me new words....

  205. Why would fox keep KOTH over Family Guy by NoTalentAssClown · · Score: 1

    I never understood how King of the Hill was kept in the line up with the frquency it has been while the Family Guy was canceled. King of the Hill is just not funny.

  206. voices by boarder · · Score: 1

    Do you know how little time it actually takes a voice cast member to do a show? Watch the Inside the Actor's Studio with the Simpsons cast... they say they only go in for a few hours a week and never actually work "together." They all have multiple other projects going, and the Simpsons is pretty much a side project (that pays really well).

    Adding the very small time commitment to the fact that there are only about three people who do voices on the show (one of whom is the show's creator, and he does three of the main characters), I don't think it will be very hard to get the show up and running.

    So fuck you, you fucking fuck.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  207. The true reason TFG was cancelled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am by far a huge fan of TFG. Bought both DVD sets the day they came out.

    I hardly ever caught an episode while it was on the air... why? They put it in the worst time slot possible for any growing show.

    I am married. I suspect that I am in the majority demographic that enjoyed the show. "Married" means I live with a woman. "Live with a woman" means I am eternally cursed into watching every new episode of Friends. Since TFG was so damn awesome, they (fox =~ s/o/u/;) thought: "Let's destroy NBC's cash cow with it!!!" And they would have, except for one thing: I would rather not piss of my wife, and still get laid, than watch family guy, and derive her of that template emotional chocolate that has vomitted all over my thursday nights, and thusly close up vagina-town for good.

    Anyways - once I got the DVD's, I watched every episode, I was able to share them with my friends, they got hooked, went out and bought their own copies, and I think that's pretty much how the boom happened.

    ONE OF THE BEST SEQUENCES IN THE WHOLE SERIES WAS:

    Peter comes home from sensitivity training after being forced to go by his boss, Mr. Weed. He is basically acts like a gay nancy now.

    In a bonding moment while stewie is sleeping, he checks to see that noone is around, and then slowly and gently places his nipple in stewies mouth. Stewie gives a suckle, pulls back, pulls a hair out of his mouth, and then realizes what is going on - PURE GENIUS!

    Timing is everything on that show, and they had it down to a science.

  208. Just add FG to the list... by n7ytd · · Score: 1

    ...of the good shows that Fox has had over the years that they replace with crap.

    Futurama
    Married With Children (ok, this one had run its course)
    Andy Richter Controls the Universe (hit and miss here)
    X-Files, of course (yes, yes, I know...)

    It's good to hear that I'm not the only one left on the planet who can't stand the "reality" shows that seem to populate the channel these days.

  209. First three? by Kernull · · Score: 1

    I'll bet this question ahs already been asked, but I didn't see the answer. If Family Guy is No. 4 top seller, then what are the first three?

  210. More quotes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    [At a job interview] Interviewer: So where do you see yourself in five years?
    Peter Griffin: [Thinking to himself "Don't say doing you wife! Don't say doing your wife!"] Doing your, uh, son...

    --------

    Peter Griffin: I'm looking for some toilet training books. Salesman: We have the popular 'everybody poops", or the less popular 'nobody poops but you'. Peter Griffin: Well, you see, we're catholic. . . Salesman: Ah, then you'll want 'you're a naughty, naughty boy, and that's concentrated evil coming out the back of you'.

    -------

    Stewie Griffin: Yay and God said to Abraham, "you will kill your son, Issak", and Abraham said, "I can't hear you, you'll have to speak into the microphone." "Oh I'm sorry, Is this better? Check, check, check... Jerry, pull the high end out, I'm still getting some hiss back here."

    More...

  211. Why no Futurama? I'll tell you why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fox owns the merchandising for The Simpsons and Family Guy. Groening owns the merch rights to Futurama.

    Ergo, no Futurama...

    Just Pointless

  212. Why was it canceled in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seemed like a sure-fire idea: "The Simpsons for fucking retards." What happened?

  213. Monkees throw their poo! by jgoemat · · Score: 1

    Oh my God! I'm drowning!