Slashdot Mirror


Outsourcing To Rural America

An anonymous reader writes "News.com is running a story about Rural Sourcing, a company attempting to make outsourcing to rural America as cost effective as sending jobs to India."

887 comments

  1. People in the blue states by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Treat them like ignorant foreigners, so why not?

    1. Re:People in the blue states by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      You are right. We should be outsourcing to rural New York, Oregon, California, New England, and Maryland....

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    2. Re:People in the blue states by reso · · Score: 1

      Insightful?

      Jeez. I'm real sorry i don't live in a state that voted in the same candidate that has given the U.S. the highest national debt ever.

      Please don't complain about economic problems and the underpaid U.S. workers -- you got what was important to you --your moral high-ground. Instead of trying to stop guys from kissing each other next election, you might want to consider the economy for a few seconds.

      --


  2. The Difference by techsoldaten · · Score: 5, Funny

    The difference between offshoring to India and insourcing to rural areas?

    Indians speak better English.

    M

    1. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indians speak better English.

      So sayeth the man who has never contacted Compaq tech support.

    2. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jokes aside,

      They also better educated ...

    3. Re:The Difference by Craptastic+Weasel · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually some of the software they will be supporting is already in beta.

      Ok thats a little harsh, but hey it's friday, and I have got karma to burn, baby.

    4. Re:The Difference by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Having lived in Tennessee and Alabama for several years at a time, I must say this post is not funny. It's informative. There were people there that I simply could not understand, even after asking them to repeat themselves 5 times.

    5. Re:The Difference by halfbakedleek · · Score: 1

      When someone says 'outsourcing', is 'outsourcing to India' the first/only thing that comes to mind?

      In a company meeting, someone mentioned a client outsourcing a portion of their IT function. I thought it was unlikely that they were outsourcing it to India, since the client is a small-ish midwestern bank, but rather that they were outsourcing it to a local 'IT Solutions' firm instead of hiring a sysAdmin.

    6. Re:The Difference by JWW · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some of us in the rural midwest speak perfectly good english.

      You can't always say that about the urban northeast ;-)

    7. Re:The Difference by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Compared to... New York? Hey youzz guyzzz got a problem with your computer?
      Or maybe Southern California. Dude your system has some seriously bad karma going on.

      Yea what ever. If you look at the school system ratings you will find that best schools tend to be in the more rural states. Here is the top ten by % of students that graduate. Only one state New Jersey could be called urban.

      1 NEW JERSEY 87%
      2 NORTH DAKOTA 86%
      3 UTAH 86%
      4 IOWA 85%
      5 NEBRASKA 84%
      6 SOUTH DAKOTA 83%
      7 WEST VIRGINIA 83%
      8 MONTANA 81%
      9 WISCONSIN 81%
      10 MINNESOTA 80%

      The big urban states of California and New York are ranked 35th and 39th.

      My home state is at the bottom of the list. Why? Our schools suck. Too many retired people that do not want to pay for good schools because "they already paid for their kids to go to school". Well when they get the snot beat out of them by roaming gangs of drop outs we will see. When will people learn that you will pay for schools or for prisons.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:The Difference by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Some of us in the rural midwest speak perfectly good english.

      You meant you "speak English perfectly well," right?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    9. Re:The Difference by friendscallmelenny · · Score: 1
      I'm from North Carolina (the least backward Carolina!) and my wife could not understand many of my relatives for the first year of my marriage. She was convinced my young cousins had speech impediments.

      I had an aunt that worked for Piedmont Airlines as a reservationist. When Piedmont was bought out by US Air they sent all the phone people to speech training classes.

    10. Re:The Difference by TamMan2000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you look at the school system ratings you will find that best schools tend to be in the more rural states. Here is the top ten by % of students that graduate. Only one state New Jersey could be called urban.

      Graduating a higher percentage doesn't mean better schools. In fact, it could mean lower standards...

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    11. Re:The Difference by aceat64 · · Score: 1

      "They also better educated..." If only I could get +5 self-restraint for not making fun of you...

    12. Re:The Difference by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      When will people learn that you will pay for schools or for prisons.

      Compared to now, where we pay for bad schools AND bad prisons?

      Gee, maybe these people just don't want to pay the government to mismanage either?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    13. Re:The Difference by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      No - but he said that in a way that almost everyone could understand :)

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    14. Re:The Difference by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Or better inputs (students) to begin with.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    15. Re:The Difference by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Having lived in Tennessee and Alabama for several years at a time, I must say this post is not funny. It's informative. There were people there that I simply could not understand, even after asking them to repeat themselves 5 times."

      Well, in our defense...our schools are a bit remiss in not teaching ebonics...and it does make it hard for us to talk to some of you NE urbanites...

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:The Difference by ThePlague · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if this will work in written form, but your post reminds me of a joke.

      Air France was beginning to fly out of Atlanta. They trained their employees for months to properly say "Air France" when they answered the phone (so that it does not rhyme with "dance"). It took months, but eventually the local accent was removed.

      The first day of service, the Georgian answering the phone says "Air France" perfectly, but then continues "Canna hep ya?"

    17. Re:The Difference by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Informative

      His sentence is correct as it stands.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    18. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "They also better educated..." If only I could get +5 self-restraint for not making fun of you...

      Don't blame him - his teleprompter quit.

    19. Re:The Difference by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Or lack of meaningful alternatives.

      M

    20. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nope. Many of those same states also tend to have high ACT/SAT scores too. The schools are certainly not the giant kid warehouses that you'll find in many metro areas. It's not uncommon to have teachers that not only taught your older siblings, but probably taught or went to school with your parents (depending on the subject, with the same books - our algebra teacher didn't want to get new books. The 20-30 year old ones were still in good shape and had harder problems than any of the new ones). The good ones will use this knowledge to make sure the students do not slack off. If you don't pass a grade, they have no problem keeping you at that grade level until you do. There was a new kid from the east coast one year. He was 17, but had just been passed along from grade to grade. Once he got to our school, the teachers moved him back a grade level until he was actually competent with the subject matter. Sure, he was 6 years older than everyone else in the class, but for the first time anyone gave a damn that he actually learned something in school. Not to mention that in many rural areas, the students have a good motivation to study hard: not a lot of jobs.

      I never knew of anyone at home that couldn't read or write. It was unthinkable. I'm in a metro area now were at least 1/4 of the population is illiterate - and that's not counting the illegal immigrants.

    21. Re:The Difference by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Or less total population.

    22. Re:The Difference by sevensharpnine · · Score: 1

      North Dakota, my home state, might not be a great place to outsource to. It pains me to say it, but unless something happens soon, it will turn into one giant retirement home. A good USA Today article hereoutlines the problems with the state: it has the highest percentage of high-school grads, the highest percentage of students going to college, and the highest dollar-per-student spending in higher-ed, but it doesn't have enough jobs to hold them. People, like me, are fleeing the state for job opportunities. It's the only state with a declining population in the last few years. Living in North Dakota is a daunting prospect for many; you might have a degree, and a good job, but there are few other work opportunities. The prospect of losing your job in a market that rarely hires people of your discipline is scary. In the bigger cities (towns, really), it's not too bad, but in the largely rural areas, there's just not enough professional work.

      In a desperate attempt to hold on the college grads, the state has been offering to pay lump sums to get people to stay in the state (last I heard, it was a few hundred dollars to high-school grads--coupled with an emotional plea about the future of the state). Before I left, people were talking about raising the payout, and even the possibility of state-funded incentives for mortgages and such (although I don't know if that ever materialized).

      To be fair, I think it would be a good place to outsource to right now. The state has a low cost of living and many cities have very friendly business-oriented incentives to bring business in. But the long-term prospect is scary. Educated people are leaving in droves, and most don't return. The town I left was projecting to double or possibly triple their retirement-home capacity within the next fifteen to twenty years. Many kids move away, and the average age keeps getting higher. Attracting outsourcing work might very well be the state's last-ditch effort to modernize the economy.

      --
      "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." -Voltaire
    23. Re:The Difference by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Iowa will welcome you at the door, then.

      The upper midwest has a lot to offer young people - everything except jobs. If this kind of thing can gain a foothold, and we can offer these kind of jobs, then we can take back our states from the elderly.

      Just as a side note, Fargo seems to have a pretty good business climate. The banking software that we use was and is developed there.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    24. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey you insensitive clod, the east coast has hick towns too .....

    25. Re:The Difference by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      Another list is here.

    26. Re:The Difference by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, that's an interesting question. Let me give you what might be a relevant example.

      Some years ago, an auto parts manufacturing company that I did a lot of contract systems development for moved from Illinois' second largest city (Rockford, some sixty miles from Chicago) out to a completely rural area a hundred and twenty-odd miles even further away from Chicago. I mean, I had to drive out there a few times to upgrade some equipment and I was amazed at just how rural it was. I passed farmland, cows, grain silos ... and suddenly, there was this big manufacturing plant stuck in the middle of nowhere. Across the street was a grain storage operation, and next door was a tractor dealer. Interestingly, most of the workers were women: farm housewives for the most part that otherwise would have been sitting at home watching TV. They made less that comparable city workers but the cost of living was much less so that balanced out. These folks were highly motivated, and the company got much higher quality employees than they would have found anywhere near a big city, paid substantially less in property taxes. The company did spend a lot of money providing training for these people (some of the positions were pretty high-tech) but it paid off in a big way. In fact, one time I was there I heard an announcement over the PA system, "Notice to all employess ... there will not be any overtime this weekend." The chorus of "awwws" was deafening. The only drawback, I suppose, was the increased transport costs but since this outfit shipped parts worldwide it wasn't an issue.

      And believe me ... the Indians do not speak better English. At least not the ones I usually get on tech support lines. Not even close.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    27. Re:The Difference by Tacky+the+Penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can tell you from experience that our rural school is much better than the urban school our children used to attend. For instance, instead of doing everything they could do to avoid helping my son who has asparager's, the rural school (Pine River) is doing everything possible to help him -- and he's thriving. I just can't say enough good things about them. I wish I had gone there as a kid.

      By the way, accusing the rural schools of having lower standards is silly. The gummint works hard to keep standards uniform -- for better of for worse.

      In summary, the test sample I have seen supports the claim that rural schools are better. Your mileage may vary.

    28. Re:The Difference by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Graduating a higher percentage doesn't mean better schools. In fact, it could mean lower standards...

      Yeah California and New York have high education standards hehe.
      The mods take down the guy who posted facts (here they are btw) http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/cr_31_tabl e_2.htm
      and mod +5 the guy with the "but, but..." retort that has absoultly no basis in fact. I'll ofcourse now be modded down for pointing this out. I love it

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    29. Re:The Difference by coopaq · · Score: 0
      Some of us in the rural midwest speak perfectly good english.

      You can't always say that about the urban northeast ;-)

      And they said racism was dead.

      Nope. Just a lot more sublte.

    30. Re:The Difference by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      My post, while not indicating the parent was wrong (I don't think it should have been modded down), is entirely based in fact. It proposes (not claims as fact) an alternative explanation, which (in fact) would cause the result of the parent.

      And Cali and NY do have pretty high standards, if you stay out of the cities...

      In fact, small urban populations are a common thread among the states listed by the parent of my post.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    31. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true, we do speak better english.

      We often ignore those that choose not to live in LA, NY or Chigago where housing is cha-ching $$$. Not only is it cheaper to live in a small place, it leads to a better life. 20 minutes to work -- maybe.

      We are often locked into the crock of going to great lengths to be in the office it is sick.

      Information Tech workers need not show at all and for those diciplined - put out and done go to the office. Beat the car depreciation, poor air quality, over-priced lunches, expensive cloths, and get the job done in style.

      Work at home. Do it all the time, for the right people it is heaven.

    32. Re:The Difference by ashot · · Score: 3, Informative


      no, his/her sentence is correct, if you wanted to use well it would be:

      speaks English perfectly well

      as well is an adverb that should modify a verb, whereas in his sentence, good, an adjective, modifies the noun English.

      --
      -ashot
    33. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Red State illiterates will be a better deal than motivated Indians. This will go far...

    34. Re:The Difference by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

      Depends where you live, in Northern NJ, most of the schools are in-town public schools, so you were only going to school with the people in your town, and most likely less than 500 in most but there were a few here or there with more.

      The high-school I went to was part of a regional school district composing of two high-schools and the elementary and middle school of the other township, however the high-school I went to was in-town and it probably could have saved taxpayers a whole lot of money combining the two high-schools into one.

      My education there seemed alright, but like many New Jersey schools, the math dept. was severly lacking. My 9th grade Algerbra teacher sucked ass. I think the only reason they highered him was because he knew how to coach football, and the football team also sucked ass, regardless of his coaching, they always have.

    35. Re:The Difference by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, as my Dad used to say, "It's the life if you can handle it." Problem is, a lot of people can't.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    36. Re:The Difference by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Having moved around many times while in the school system, my vote is for parental involvment. That makes a bigger difference in school performance than funding, federal funds, or anything else.

      In most states if a child skips, parents are called. In Nebraska, you can almost certainly count on the parent taking action. In some states so many parents don't care that they're talking about having to fine parents, take other actions if the children don't attend school.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    37. Re:The Difference by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      That's sort of what I was talking about. I once heard on the radio that Iowa teachers taking credit for good students was like Iowa farmers taking credit for good crops - the real credit lies in the soil from which the students/crops spring.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    38. Re:The Difference by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I really do not care about being modded one way or the other. To get modded up you just have to say. Microsoft/SCO are evil. Which I do tend to agree with seems like such a waste of effort. I have Karma to burn anyway:) Anyway as the retort well does he have any facts to back up the lower standards claim?
      Some one did post some other numbers that showed Mass as the "smartest" state. Which I can believe since they have MIT and Harvard and a lot of other really good colleges not to mention a large number of high tech companies. My data was to show that the less urban states did a very good job of providing education through high school.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    39. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't take it personally, actuall do. You see it was these areas that just voted GWB back in - demonstrating to USA and the world that even in the slums of Calcutta there are more intellegent people with higher levels self respect.

    40. Re:The Difference by Kesh · · Score: 1
      I grew up in Appalachia, and I agree that some folks there are almost impossible to understand. Mostly just rural dialects, just like some urban areas have their own dialects.

      However, if you really want to hear the English language mangled, come to Hawaii. I dare you to translate pidgin English if you've never heard it before. ;)

    41. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Englander's are not a race you stupid fuck.

      P.S. Whoever told you that racism was dead needs to get off the pipe.

    42. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like the English teachers weren't any good either...

    43. Re:The Difference by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 0

      In my school district in St. Louis if you skip elementary school the cops come looking for you at home and take you to school. This happened back in the day.

    44. Re:The Difference by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 0

      They found the larger the percentage of students taking the SAT in a state, the lower the average SAT. In the 10 states with the highest SAT scores, an average of 8 percent of their high school students took the SAT, while 69 percent of students took the test in the 10 lowest scoring states. In short: the state SAT averages are meaningless. Plus, they want to teach creationism in all those hillbilly states. -proud to score 174 points higher than Pres. Bush on the SAT and raised in a VERY liberal suburban school district in Missouri.

    45. Re:The Difference by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Indians speak better English.

      Hindustanis may have better *grammar* than hicks, but they're still a bit
      harder to understand, as a result of the accent (unless the hicks are from
      rural Virginia or Texas, in which case they're about equal).

      The worst accents for English though are from people whose native language
      is tonal and doesn't make a big deal about consonants (e.g., Korean). The
      good thing about an accent from India is that they have the whole consonant
      thing down pat. In fact, it's the vowels they screw up mostly, and vowels
      are less critical to English than consonants. We even have a couple of
      domestic accents in the US that mangle the vowels pretty badly, such as
      Texas (err, Take-sus), where vowels are many long that would be short
      elsewhere.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    46. Re:The Difference by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      Consider a post following this one:

      "Here's the top 20 from the latest US census.
      3. Colorado - 35.7%
      9. Minnesota - 30.5%
      13. Kansas - 29.1%
      17. Illinois - 27.3%
      18. Nebraska - 27.1%"

      I have included all of the states which might claim to be part of the "midwest" and fail to see either Iowa or North Dakota. Of farming states which might be like Iowa or ND, Minnesota, Kansas and Nebraska (although this may not correctly characterize MN or KS, which have large industrial sectors) do make the list while Iowa and ND fail to do so. Why?
      U. Iowa and Iowa State U. are good universities; Iowa also has some good private universities. I am surprised to find that Iowa is not in the top 20.

    47. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Im convinced school reputaion does not make you smart nor does money. I've seen smart people come from bad schools, and I have seen stupid people come from high reputation schools. Reading and learning on your own and interacting with other smart people, asking good questions, makes you smart. The answers lie within, not in the big ivory towers. Thowing all the government money in the world to an unmotivated student will produce nothing but high paid administrators. Ramanujan, Einstein, Newton ect. The schools they graduated from weren't special. The way I see it, the problem with schools today is motivation, students don't see the relavance of what thier learning because they can't apply it to thier day to day lives.

    48. Re:The Difference by Bandit0013 · · Score: 1

      You know, I spent time in Omaha recently on company business. "Rural" state but also one of the major tech support areas in the US. Why? Because midwesterners have the easiests accents to understand across the board.

    49. Re:The Difference by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      What list is that?

      If you're talking about retention of graduates - its tough in Iowa. For the last 20 years we've been educating our kids and shipping them out of state to fuel the economies elsewhere.

      My comment was in reference to the state getting older (in his case ND, in my case Iowa). I think that Iowa is the "second oldest state" in the union behind Florida (maybe the third during the winter months when all the old people go to Arizona). Both ND and IA need something to start retaining those kids that we educate to help our state instead of others.

      Reading through this subject, there are a good number of people who have moved from small towns and rural areas that would go back given the chance. Right now that chance doesn't really exist, but if a rural outsourcing trend picks up it would create those kind of jobs in rural areas.

      As a side note, much of southern and western MN is a farming area - and is more like IA and ND in those areas. The twin cities probably distort the overall picture for the state. You'd probably see the same for Missouri and Kansas if you removed Kansas City and St. Louis from consideration.

      Rural towns are fighting to survive right now, and if we can lure one of these outfits - even a small one employing only 10 or so people - it would be a great shot in the arm for our local economy.

      As a side note - if you know of any company wishing to set up an outsourcing shop in real rural America, shoot me an e-mail and I'll get you in touch with our economic development outfit - we want you!

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    50. Re:The Difference by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      No, when people say they are outsourcing *development*, it's to India or Eastern Europe.

    51. Re:The Difference by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      The twin cities probably distort the overall picture for the state. You'd probably see the same for Missouri and Kansas if you removed Kansas City and St. Louis from consideration.
      I would generally agree with you. Each of these states has a top 50 city, Minneapolis, Minnesota and Wichita, Kansas. The two largest privately held companies in the U.S. are located in MN (Cargill) and KS (Koch) with revenues of $48B and $40B respectively. However, ...

      The twin cities probably distort the overall picture
      Hormel has its headquarters and R&D in Austin, Minnesota, the Mayo Clinic is headquartered in Rochester, Minnesota, Cargill started in Austin, Minnesota and is headquartered in Minnesota, etc. Of course, Minnesota has large companies in the twin cities (e.g. 3M is headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota.)

      see the same for ... Kansas if you removed Kansas City
      The largest city in Kansas is Wichita (not Kansas City). The aircraft industry in Wichita (e.g. Boeing, Raytheon (Beech), Cessna & Learjet) is a big employer in Wichita and Koch is headquartered there.

      My guess is that the rural areas in MN and KS are seeing a population decline; I am too lazy to actually check. Other than "spillover" from large urban areas (e.g. Las Vegas), I suspect rural areas are losing population all over the U.S.; does anyone know if this is true in upstate NY?

    52. Re:The Difference by jdbartlett.com · · Score: 1

      Agreed. In fact, Minneapolis (a Midwestern city) was recently declared the most literate city in the USA. Not really rural, being such a major city, but still in the Midwest.

    53. Re:The Difference by mjeppsen · · Score: 1

      I live in Arkansas you insensitive clod!

    54. Re:The Difference by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Oh, I was talking about those other rural areas.

      Why did you assume I was referencing Arkansas, home state of the General Wesley Clark?

      M

    55. Re:The Difference by mjeppsen · · Score: 1

      Why did you assume I was referencing Arkansas, home state of the General Wesley Clark?

      Arkansas is considered rural. You didn't specify any particular rural area in your post.
      Arkansans are often the butt of language jokes. See: "Ya'll".
      I was attempting a joke.

    56. Re:The Difference by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Arkansas is a diverse state that cannot be called primarily rural - it's like a fountain for modern cosmopolitan ideas and great political thinkers. Maya Angelou, Glen Campbell, Kevin McReynolds, Wesley Clark and Bill Clinton all came from there and shaped the world with their thoughts.

      The time I spent in Little Rock and Pine Bluff was in the company of some very intellectually honest and sophisticated people. Average folks on the street were well-read, interested in complex affairs in the world around them, and never said "Y'All" even once during the 7 years I lived there.

      On the one hand, I don't want to argue with a local about their hometown, you certainly are closer to the situation that I. On the other hand, I really suggest you look around and try to learn a little bit more about where you live.

      Other places are rural. I met mountain men who ain't never done no learnin' and got no goodn' speakses 'bout 'em. They ain't never seen a phone much less done got one for the goodness. They Pa mighta hada truck, and they got it once he died, but now they done walk the mule for staples since Clelbert's gaserinery got washed down the mudslide. Mm-hmm.

      M

    57. Re:The Difference by mjeppsen · · Score: 1

      Arkansas is a diverse state that cannot be called primarily rural - it's like a fountain for modern cosmopolitan ideas and great political thinkers. Maya Angelou, Glen Campbell, Kevin McReynolds, Wesley Clark and Bill Clinton all came from there and shaped the world with their thoughts.

      For starters, Google "define:rural"
      Arkansas has a thriving farming economy, has many "remote" areas, and besides a few large cities is NOT a population center. Hence the "rural" designation.
      I think what you are doing is associating "rural" with "backward". I'm well aware of the accomplishments of Arkansas favored sons, and as equally aware of the corporate successes that hail from The Natural State. Intelligent people being born in Arkansas doesn't prove or disprove that Arkansas is "rural".

      On the other hand, I really suggest you look around and try to learn a little bit more about where you live.

      So that I know more about the smart, forward-thinkers that live in Pine Bluff and L.R.? No thanks, I done been learned about my state. Methinks that if you have never heard the term "Ya'll" used in casual conversation, perhaps YOU are the one that needs to study Arkansas.

    58. Re:The Difference by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      What is the problem then?

      If rural means an area lacking a large population center, you have nothing to worry about. There is nothing to be offended by.

      If rural connotes backwardness, then my argument stands up. Arkansas is a forward-thinking state that has produced some great Americans and cannot be considered rural.

      This is a difference in terms, nothing more.

      M

  3. Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    So rather than "Tank you vor calling Cisco, dis is Singh, how may I help you?" I'll hear "Thanks fer callin' Cis-coe, this is Billy-Joe Jim-Bob, what's yer malfunction?"

    It's a joke, lighten up.

    1. Re:Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless their based Pennsylvania in which case you'll hear "Tis a fine malfunction ye have there, English"

    2. Re:Uhhh... by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Troll

      Some folk'll never eat a skunk
      But then again, some folk'll...
      Like Cletus
      The slack-jawed yokel. ...
      Most folk'll never lose a toe
      And then again, some folk'll...
      Like Cletus
      The slack-jawed yokel. ...
      Some folk'll not maintain your hub
      And then again, some folk'll...
      Like Cletus
      The slack-jawed yokel.

    3. Re:Uhhh... by Abm0raz · · Score: 3, Funny

      As a Pennsylvania resident, I resemble that remark. We're sick of yins jaggovs talkin' poop about us, n'at. Yins need taught a lesson.

      Now I'm headin' dahntahn to da sowside. Gonna pound sum Ahrns and watch Cow-er and Da Stillers whup sum more arse this weekend.

      -Ab

      --
      Nothing fails quite like prayer.
    4. Re:Uhhh... by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      Great, four US workers for one indian, how's that for effciency.

    5. Re:Uhhh... by Eclipce · · Score: 0

      The real question is, which one is more understandable? I think the latter, but that may have something to do with where I was born. ;)

    6. Re:Uhhh... by TJPile · · Score: 1

      Yinz goin' dahtahn in the bonaville?

    7. Re:Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's awsome. For some reason I can picture Slim Pickens saying that....

    8. Re:Uhhh... by x4A6D74 · · Score: 1

      It's definitely clear from your dialect that you're not just a PA resident, but a Pittsburgh resident ... having grown up just outside of Pgh but having relatives in Philly (and NJ, 5 miles outside of Philly), and now attending university in Indiana, I can say with certainty that Pittsburgh-ese is a unique dialect of Hick. Nowhere else have I heard of a bird called an "iggle," nor have I heard "yins" (or "yuns," or "y(i|u)ns guys"). I also, until first grade, didn't know who George "Warshington" was ... I'd heard of a guy named Washington, but this "warshing" business was pretty new. --0x4a6d74

    9. Re:Uhhh... by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 3, Informative

      Phillyspeak:

      Water is pronounced "wooder"

      With is pronounced "wit" ex: Gimme' 2 eggs wit scrapple

      Beautiful is pronounced "Beauty Full"

      Curb is pronounced "curve"

      "The Eagles" are "da' Iggles"

      "I'm goin down the shore this weekend" - Trip to Wildwood beach

      "Up the mountains" - Trip to the Pocanos

      Schuylkill is pronouced the "School Kill"

      "Widges" means With Us - ex: Yo, we're goin to the bar ... you commn' widges?

      Arthritis is pronounced "Author-Ritus"

      ACME is pronounced "Ack-A-Me"

      Bagel is pronounced "Beg'll"

      Meet You is "Meetcha"

      Vowels is pronounced Vails

    10. Re:Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really isn't a joke. That is what you will hear.
      As an IT worker in a rural-sourced company, that's darn tootin' close to what I hear when I call our helpdesk.

      Rural-sourcing should scare the hell out of city-slickers, too. They can pay us 1/2 what you get paid and we'll take it because to us it is good money. We can pay the trailer bills with that kinda cash and never be late again.
      Guess what, we're also educated. We can and will do you job just as well as you ever did. I'll have another slice of your pie, thank you kindly sir.

    11. Re:Uhhh... by Fnord · · Score: 1

      My mother was from Philly. Its pretty much a Jersey accent only whinier.

  4. Count me in. by JavaLord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll move from Manhattan to somewhere in hicksville for a job in no time. Fresh air, no subways, no bums. I'm down. Where do I sign up?

    1. Re:Count me in. by meabolex · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the cost of living is WAAAY less than Manhattan. Hell, living reasonably in Queens is probably somewhere between 3-4 times more expensive than living similarly out in southern rural areas.

      --
      FORTUNE FAVORS IRONY
    2. Re:Count me in. by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      Here you go. Just click the Registration Change link.

    3. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just head to sykes in Manhattan. Not that Manhattan. Manhattan, Kansas! The good news: freshmen still stay the same age.

    4. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bums here in the country are called rednecks. And there definitely are still here...

    5. Re:Count me in. by superpulpsicle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's the part I never quite understood about companies that want to be built in downtown areas.

      The commute sucks cause everyone has to drive to a subway station first. Then take a subway as the 2nd part of commute.

      Even if you want to drive, chances are you won't find parking.

      The office lease is far more expensive in the center of a city than some suburbs.

      The network speed is the same.

      The company may be in some skyscraper building sharing it with 50 companies. That means your company is on the 20th floor. Management gets all the window office, and everyone else cubes.

    6. Re:Count me in. by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 1

      no bums

      You're complaining about homeless in Manhattan???

      Man... You'd better not consider relocating to DC.

    7. Re:Count me in. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, there are TONS of tech opportunities outside of New York City. Almost everybody who does tech related stuff here in NYC is here because they want to be.

      In fact, outside of finance, there's a lot more tech stuff going up in Boston, down in DC, then there's RTP in N. Carolina, and places like Austin, TX. Many of these places have much lower cost of living options than Manhattan, though perhaps none are as cheap as really living out in the middle of bumfuck.

      The more of you haters leave, the more of NYC for me to enjoy.

      Also - your complaints illustrate that you aren't a true New Yorker. If you were, you'd know that we barely have any bums and we have gorgeous subways compared to the way things were 15 or 20 years ago. And the air isn't so terrible outside of midtown - I go for a stroll in Central Park several times a week, and it's a truly beautiful place with plenty of fresh air. No, not the same as going out into the middle of nowhere, but I try to get out of the city for real countryside as often as possible anyway.

    8. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the part I never quite understood about companies that want to be built in downtown areas.
      ...
      The company may be in some skyscraper building sharing it with 50 companies. That means your company is on the 20th floor. Management gets all the window office, and everyone else cubes.

      You just answered your own question. Who do you think is making the decision to locate in the downtown skyscraper? The CEO of course. He's getting a nice window office, and probably chauffeur service.

    9. Re:Count me in. by lildogie · · Score: 1

      > I never quite understood about companies that want to be built in downtown areas.
      > ...
      > Management gets all the window office[s] ...

      I think you answered your own question.

    10. Re:Count me in. by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Man... You'd better not consider relocating to DC.

      Uh? You mean those smelly-yet-picturesque folks sleeping in bus stops? I was told those were secret service agents in disguise.

      /clueless tourist

      --
      No sig
    11. Re:Count me in. by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      There are places outside of Manhattan that can have better window views than what is available in the city.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    12. Re:Count me in. by danzona · · Score: 1

      That's the part I never quite understood about companies that want to be built in downtown areas.

      By consolidating a million jobs into a small physical area - downtown Chicago for example - workers are drawn in from all over the world because of the perception that there are tremendous opportunities.

      Compare this with the number of workers running out of a beautiful place like Tucson, Arizona because they perceive that there are few opportunities.

    13. Re:Count me in. by macklin01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed!

      As stated below, the cost of living is fantastic. I grew up in Nebraska, and it's amazing what kind of a beautiful home and acreage you can get for $250,000. By contrast, it's amazing what you can't get for $1,000,000 in California.

      Also, this is a good thing (TM) for the region. The rural areas have been in decline for many decades, as agriculture has become so efficient that it can't support too many more people. So economic opportunity has been pretty poor. This has caused demographic problems, as the educated youth move to other regions where there are better (or existent) job opportunities. There isn't much call for research scientists in Wahoo, Nebraska.

      This is also good for the corps. relocating there. Not only is the work ethic a strong aspect of the Middle American culture, but the years of lacking opportunity might make for more motivated employees.

      Of course, then there's the reduced cost of labor, the lower utility rates, gasoline doesn't cost $2.50 a gallon, and lower tax rates. Not a bad package. -- Paul

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    14. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll move from Manhattan to somewhere in hicksville for a job in no time. Fresh air, no subways, no bums. I'm down. Where do I sign up?

      Uh huh. How much time have you spent in hicksville? There's a reason why the population is declining in rural areas -- people move out as a) its boring as hell and b) there's no jobs there.

    15. Re:Count me in. by cmowire · · Score: 1

      Closer access to all of the useful services of a city -- like the offices of the companies you work with, service offices, temporary services, etc. The network speed may not be the same for heavy-duty networks. I'm betting that a OC-192 is much easier to get in Silicon Valley than in rural Tenesee.

      And also a lot of people who do relatively specilized tasks tend to like being near a cluster of businesses. Even really odd things like being a medical specialist in a town with a single factory in it, where if the factory is shut down, you aren't going to have any business.

      It's also a sense of prestige.

      Oh yeah, and the afforementioned CEO-gets-a-nice-window-suite advantage. ;)

    16. Re:Count me in. by mikeswi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Greetings from Georgia.

      Actually, we call "bums" "homeless" or "vagrants".

      There are less of them, because the population is not as dense and because we tend to try putting them to work instead of propping them up forever. A lot of field and construction laborers are homeless men picked up on a corner and driven in the back of the boss's pickup truck to the job site. That doesn't happen up north because of all the labor unions.

      Rednecks typically work for a living, either at manual labor or one or two steps removed from it. They're usually the ones driving the pickup truck that carry the homeless to a job site. A lot of rednecks own small businesses, usually something to do with farming or construction. They have 2 or 3 kids, watch wrestling, football and nascar and drive pickup trucks. Rednecks tend to be conservative and listen to country music.

    17. Re:Count me in. by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 1
      There's a lot of good office space outside of downtown, too, at least for a smaller company (though large buildings exist as well). Most of the space is old, so there's a greater buildout cost, and maybe some problems (i.e., old building layouts might not meet current desires). I don't think it's that bad, though. I like old buildings.

      I think you get most of the advantages of the city that way, without the disadvantages of a downtown. And you get better access employees in the city, who are often reluctant to work in the suburbs.

      Of course, this fits a certain demographic. It's not as prestigious as a downtown office, or as modern as a suburban office, and city employees fit a particular demographic. These work well for certain companies, and aren't as important to others. Popular for graphic design companies and little web development shops. Used to be great for light industry, but many of them have moved out; I think that's a shame. I'd really like to see mixed use city neighborhoods take off more than they have; I think it's better for everyone. It's also the antithesis of the suburbs.

    18. Re:Count me in. by misleb · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Simple. "Downtown" is central. As much of a pain as it might be to get downtown, it can be much more difficult to get from one suburb to another. Public transportation usually isn't even an option in this case. Also, don't forget about how many potential employees live in the city.

      That said, there is a trend, at least in the Chicago metro area for companies to put offices in suburbs. They got big high rises in the middle of nowhere. ANd i'll tell you... they SUCK as far as location goes. The only things they have going for them is a cheaper leases and parking. A reverse commute can be just as nasty and, again, public transporation is not an option. It is a car or nothing. It is also more difficult to carpool becuase the chances of a friend going to work in the same area as you is slim.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    19. Re:Count me in. by SiW · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a reason why the population is declining in rural areas -- people move out as a) its boring as hell and b) there's no jobs there.

      Yeah, but the crank is great!

    20. Re:Count me in. by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

      I'm posting this from Hicksville. It's only about a one hour train ride from Manhattan.

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    21. Re:Count me in. by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Typically downtown areas are centrally located which means that if your main concern is to attract "talent" from across a metro region, you have a good chance to make it possible for everyone to get to you.

      Second, I think there is a certain amount of cachet from being located downtown.

      Third, there are lots of good places to eat lunch.

      I used to work for a company in downtown Seattle that was pretty much like what you are describing. Management got the good window view of Elliot Bay and everyone else got cubes. Plus, I had to drive 30 minutes and then take a boat to work which took another 30 minutes. That said, I loved working downtown.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    22. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The problem is that if you move to place where there's one tech company for a job with that company, it's pretty hard to change jobs, since it requires moving out of the area.

      While this concept is good (and as someone from Arkansas, I'm all for it!), areas with a diverse employment eco-system are always going to be more attractive than areas with employment monocultures.

      Yup, that's enough buzzwords for one day....

    23. Re:Count me in. by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

      Depends a lot on what you want out of life. I grew up in NYC and have since moved west (after tours in FL and TX). I miss the more "mature" attitide and cosmopolitan nature of the city life. Is it enough for me to move back? Not right now, I got a great life, and a house that would cost millions in NY --and I laugh at what the people here call "traffic". The downside is that it is cowboy country and the city is a 5x5 block of buildings maybe at most 20 stories high. Not just country music and every other car being a pickup^H^H^H^H truck with a gun rack or at least a painted one in the window, but their attitudes towards those different "folk". There is a higher degree of racism (at least as I see it) and people aren't as "worldy"...save the "transplants" from the East or West coast, very few people have seldom been out of their our county, let alone the US. It just seems that their views and experiences are much narrower and such are the offerings in many of these places.

      As the saying goes, the grass is alwasy greener on the the other side. Well there are some things to be said about concrete.

      --
      "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
    24. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were, you'd know that we barely have any bums

      Bullshit. I see them almost everyday on the upper east side of all places, and I see them EVERYDAY at Penn station. You are totally full of shit and anyone who is in NYC regularly knows it.

      and we have gorgeous subways compared to the way things were 15 or 20 years ago.

      I ride the E, the 6, sometimes the A and the 7. They all suck. Seriously, the subways look like were made in the 30's, and they smell like assjuice.

      And the air isn't so terrible outside of midtown

      Also - your complaints illustrate that you aren't a true New Yorker

      I'm not, if by "New Yorker" you mean born and raised in New York state (I'm from NJ) but I'm in NYC Monday through Friday, and I'm convinced it's the worst place on Earth. There is probably less poverty in Iraq. It probably smells better in a monkey cage at the zoo

      I'm sure I'm cutting years off my life by working in this shithole. The more of you haters leave, the more of NYC for me to enjoy.

      You can have it. The only reason I come here is that I have a great job, with a good company with people who know what the fuck they are doing. A rare thing to find in the tech world. :)

    25. Re:Count me in. by jfruhlinger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's the part I never quite understood about companies that want to be built in downtown areas. The commute sucks cause everyone has to drive to a subway station first. Then take a subway as the 2nd part of commute.

      And THAT'S why oil costs so damn much and Americans are so damn fat, everybody!

      Hey, you know those buildings that the subway passes by on its way downtown? The ones that are within walking distance of the subway stops? People live in those buildings, and they don't need to drive to the subway station. In fact, often they don't need to own a car at all!

      Does the phrase "transit-oriented development" mean anything to you? No, I didn't think it did.

      jf

    26. Re:Count me in. by El · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Depends on your priorities. Drugs, whores, and bookies are much easier to find downtown than in the 'burbs. As are good restaurants and other forms of entertainment.

      Now, if I was starting a company, what would be most important to me would be locating where the overhead is the lowest, but that's just me. The other advantage of setting up shop in a cow pasture somewhere is employee lock-in. Basically, if somebody wants to quit, they have to sell their house and move to find a new job, unlike, say, the Silicon Valley, where you can find another job in the same field right down the street. Which, ultimately, is why companies get located in population centers -- 'cause that's where the pool of potential employees is.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    27. Re:Count me in. by fupeg · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of a place called Silicon Valley? Here, the companies are spread out, with business parks mixed in with subdevelopments and strip malls. We've got Apple in Cupertino, Google and Yahoo in Mountain View, AMD in Sunnyvale, Oracle in Redwood Shores, just to name a few. There is a lot of public transit, but it is a complete alternative to using a car. No driving to a train station then riding it into town. Of course houses are crazy expensive in the area, but that's another topic. Maybe other places will follow the trend of Silicon Valley, like in Virginia and New Jersey.

    28. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you're trolling... but

      If you have such a great system of putting homeless people to work then why are they still homeless?

      That doesn't happen up north because of all the labor unions.

      Sure it does. I live in a suburb outside new york, and there's a corner nearby where you see all sorts of laborers gather each morning waiting for the contractors who come by needing workers for the day.

      We don't "prop them up forever" as you mentioned. Some homeless people in NY have untreated mental or drug or alcohol problems; it'd be difficult to employ them as day laborers without first treating their ailments. So what you see as "propping them up", we see as treating the less fortunate of our population.

    29. Re:Count me in. by FCAdcock · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's boring as hell? not even close.

      In the country you can do the things you'd get arrested for in the city.

      Ever blow up your old tv instead of just throwing it away? How about doing 150mph on a dirt road?

      We also get to do a lot of the things y'all pay tons of money for when y'all come visit us, for free. Do you know what it costs to rent a 4-wheeler and go ATV riding? it's pretty bad. We grew up doing it. You like horses? There is a horse farm behind my house.

      And then there's the food. I have a garden with fresh vegtables in the spring and summer. We hunt wild animals in the fall-spring. And we have two things y'all only with you could have: Biscuts and Waffle Houses...

      Probably my favorite part of living inthe south/rural area is the fact that instead of living in an apartment, I have 2 acres of land. My neighbors never keep me awake at night. I don't have to park and then walk to my house. And I actually own oxygen producers (trees).

      Come visit the south, if you can get past the idiots, you should actually love it. There's nothing better than southern girls in the summer...

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    30. Re:Count me in. by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Some of us live next to the subways. Companies in suburban areas are a pain because you have to drive to them, which means you need a car, insurance, and somewhere to park it, or you have to deal with shuttle busses.

      I agree that downtown isn't worth it, but edges of cities are far better than suburbs in some areas. It depends on where the good employees are likely to live in the area.

    31. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't understand the enjoyment of being downtown... ...you might be a redneck.

    32. Re:Count me in. by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      Companies that build in urban areas usually do so because there are a lot of customers in the city itself, and a lot of potential employees living in the city and surrounding suburbs. As business in the area grows, offices that do not deal directly with customers can be moved (or created) in the suburbs to allow for easy meetings between the two. Cities also tend to be very near important things like airports, which can come in handy when dealing with out-of-town clients.

    33. Re:Count me in. by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      Tuscon, along with the whole southwest border region, has also had one hell of a drought for five years. Is military spending there down?

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    34. Re:Count me in. by DaveJay · · Score: 1

      For years, I've wanted to do something like this, only I wanted to do it in Pullman (the Chicago city, look it up if you're not familiar). It was once a planned industrial community, so it'd be perfect for making a self-contained campus, but it's on the far south side and housing is (relatively) cheap. Plus, it's close to IIT. Wouldn't be AS cheap as going rural, but if you owned the buildings and rented cheaply to your workers, you could develop a great reputation as "the place" to go after college to establish your skills and credibility, before you go on to a better-paying job elsewhere.

      Or not. I live in California now, anyway. ;)

    35. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably mor like 10-15 times more expensive. I just bought my Mom a nice home in little hometown in NE (pop 850) for $45000. I have no doubt it would cost 10 times that in a coast city.

    36. Re:Count me in. by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      You know people always think that but the truth is that the cost of living is not nearly different enough to make up for the lower salaries. Just as an example. Salaries in a rural city like Little Rock are 50% of salaries in New York. And while the cost of housing may also be 50%, the cost of other necessities (food, gas, electric, etc.) is closer to 10% cheaper and non-essentials like cars, electronics, etc. are almost the same.

    37. Re:Count me in. by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      If they have some sort of ailment, then they are probably on the lower-quality end of the human gene pool (unless they are elderly). In which case, why are we trying to keep them running? They've obviously been chosen by evolution to leave the gene pool, why should we try to give them a normal life so that they can reproduce and such? Kind of an off-the-wall question, but it always comes to mind when I see people being treated for degenerative diseases and similar problems early on in their lives. Like people who are mentally retarded, why should they be allowed to reproduce? They obviously have some disorder that needs to be removed from the gene pool.

    38. Re:Count me in. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      SHHHHH!!!

      Nobody knows about Pullman, not even Chicago yuppies. You can still buy a home there for less than...

      oh damn. Here come the people with the trust funds... now the places are worth 500,000 dollars ... now 600K... 700K... 1 million...

      you think I'm kidding? Condos in UPTOWN are going for 550K now. This is insane.

    39. Re:Count me in. by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

      This is called the Macro-city effect. As face to face communications becomes less prevalent.. it is easier for professionals to find a plot of land somewhere and live far away from the city. As long as they are with 2 or 3 hours of a major airport... they can hop on to a flight when they need a real face to face.

      Kinda cool. The challenge will be land prices in the future.. both for agriculture and residential use.

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    40. Re:Count me in. by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Forget DC. I am in Santa Monica on business and I am amazed at the number of homeless. There are far more than I have ever seen in Manhattan.

    41. Re:Count me in. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      well, her in Detroit, there are no potential employees living in the city.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    42. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have believed you if you hadn't said you ride the 6 and complain about it being old. The 6 line has brand new clean trains. And the bums per capita in New York is far less than most large cities. Admit it. How long has it been since you worked in NY?

    43. Re:Count me in. by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      Hehe. I'm from Long Island too. When I first met my friend's girlfriend who lives way out by Buffalo she tried to describe quite how middle-of-nowhere her town was with "I'm an hour west of hicksville."

      Seeing my confused look ("Queens?") my friend quietly said "Sweetie, Hicksville is an actual town on Long Island..." =)

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    44. Re:Count me in. by Yazheirx · · Score: 1

      Hey, you know those buildings that the subway passes by on its way downtown? The ones that are within walking distance of the subway stops? People live in those buildings, and they don't need to drive to the subway station. In fact, often they don't need to own a car at all!

      All they need is 400K to 5 million dollars (Chicago prices) to live in a place large enough to have a spouse and a child or two with out fear of getting mugged on the way to the subway or El.

      --
      More of my thoughts
    45. Re:Count me in. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " Not to mention that the cost of living is WAAAY less than Manhattan."

      You've got that right. If you drop $250K-$350K for a brand new, built from scratch house in Little Rock...you'll get a small mansion with a large yard. Taxes are quite reasonable there...and if you move outside LR...cost of living drops at an almost exponential rate. Avg. regular apt. a few years back was like $250/mo or a little more. Cost of living has gone up a little in Little Rock over the past 8 or so years...due mostly to lots of fairly wealthy people either moving in, or native people getting wealthy.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    46. Re:Count me in. by EvilNTUser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention that in civilized countries, "downtown" is a pleasant place to live, with lots of services and jobs close to popular apartments for both families and singles. No need for everyone to live in huge monotonous suburbs with one car per family member.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    47. Re:Count me in. by relapse98 · · Score: 1
    48. Re:Count me in. by Skater · · Score: 1

      Have you priced those buildings?

      Elsewhere on /. I see posts that say I should work to live - fine, I agree with that. Except I don't want to spend all my money on a home that's even more overpriced than my current place.

      --RJ

    49. Re:Count me in. by sugam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is what is wrong with america.

      I work in the suburbs and HATE it. I HAVE to drive to work, there are no restaurants, there are no bars, there are no young people, I have to deal with traffic, I have to deal with sprawl and I have to deal with strip malls. Its terrible.

      MY ideal, wake up, get ready walk to the subway station take it to work. I'm there in 20 minutes without having to drive, and I got to read the newspaper (or a book) on they way in. Work and have a fantastic lunch in the thousands of restaurants around the city that I can WALK to. After work, WALK to a happy hour place with my co-workers, have dinner and some drinks, and take a taxi home. I can also walk to the hundreds of retail stores so If I need a new pair of jeans, i'm not stuck with just macy's. I can go umpteen different shows, concerts, restaurants, coffee shops everything is close and easy to get to.

      Now dont think that I'm one of those people that hate driving. I LOVE to drive, I hate HAVING to drive. Suburbs are evil, I applaud companies that stay in the cities.

      --
      read my blog
    50. Re:Count me in. by herdingcats · · Score: 1

      I'm also in Manhattan. Would I abandon my overpriced one-bedroom apartment in Hell's Kitchen for my three-bedroom lakeside cabin in the Adirondacks (okay, so I either thought ahead or I'm just plain lucky) to do more or less the same work with insanely less expense? Well, yeah.

      Of course, I'd miss the music and preaching and human urine on the subways as much as the next guy, but you can't have everything.

      That said, yeah, I actually _like_ The City, with all its good and bad, even though I'm a native Southerner. However, last time I checked, you really don't tumble off the end of the earth at the municipal border.

      Hell, from what I hear, they've even got broadband outside major metro areas now. Go figure.

    51. Re:Count me in. by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I don't have to park and then walk to my house."

      I don't have to park ... ever.

      You see, in the city, we can do without cars. How long does it take you to drive to the grocery store? I can WALK to it in thirty seconds.

      Never mind not needing a car, I usually don't even need a subway.

      Different strokes for different folks and all that shit.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    52. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And still lots of heroin!

    53. Re:Count me in. by furball · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Concentrated business areas mean there are easy access to other businesses nearby. For my organization the fact that one of our possible software vendors being only 3 blocks away mean that we can walk a meeting and resolve issues. Don't underestimate the value of face to face meetings. Closer is better.

      The commute doesn't suck if you also live in the area. The general philosophy of zoning in the US is atrociously bad. By zoning large commercial areas away from large residential areas you create traffic. By putting businesses around residential areas you solve this. Doesn't anyone play SimCity?

      I happen to live 1 block away from work. Where I live in Chicago, I'm 2 blocks from 2 movie theaters, 3 blocks from major shopping, 1 block from groceries, pharmacy, dental services is downstairs in my building, dry cleanings in the same building. I live in the city. I work in the city. My dependency on public transportation or even my own car is minimal. What I need in a day to day living is entirely accessible via my two feet within 10 minutes. The longest walk in my month is to get my comic books which is less than 2 miles.

      That's the value of city living.

    54. Re:Count me in. by RailRide · · Score: 1
      Now, if I was starting a company, what would be most important to me would be locating where the overhead is the lowest, but that's just me. The other advantage of setting up shop in a cow pasture somewhere is employee lock-in. Basically, if somebody wants to quit, they have to sell their house and move to find a new job, unlike, say, the Silicon Valley, where you can find another job in the same field right down the street.

      (emphasis mine)

      Maybe more CEO's will adopt this model. The employees will then be double screwed when they eventually get outsourced or downsized :)

      (sorry, somebody had to shoot for the funny)

      ---PCJ

    55. Re:Count me in. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      And...MOST cities in the US don't have subways or busses that run everywhere. Cities that themselves are very spread out. Unlike many places in Europe, businesses and people are not all close together, and it is just impractical to try to depend on mass transit for living. Grocery store is a few miles away..how do you haul a week or more's grocieries that far on a bus or bike? Job is 4 to 50 miles away...again, not practical for mass transit. Even in small cities like Little Rock...downtown is pretty much ONLY business office buildings, there really is no places for human occupancy. No apts, down there.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    56. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that the cost of living is WAAAY less than Manhattan. Hell, living reasonably in Queens is probably somewhere between 3-4 times more expensive than living similarly out in southern rural areas.

      Errr, no one said you'd be getting the same salary or benefits! And you can't really quit, because there is no other employer for miles!

    57. Re:Count me in. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I see them almost everyday on the upper east side of all places, and I see them EVERYDAY at Penn station. You are totally full of shit and anyone who is in NYC regularly knows it.

      Did you read the rest of my sentence? I can't be bothered to respond to people who reply to partial setences. Compared to 15 or 20 years ago, there are far fewer homeless people on the streets of New York. Don't tell me I'm full of shit, I first moved to New York in 1992 (though I visited before that), but my friends who've lived here their whole lives confirm this to me. If you weren't here in the 80s, or even the early 90s, then you don't know what you are talking about.

      I ride the E, the 6, sometimes the A and the 7. They all suck. Seriously, the subways look like were made in the 30's, and they smell like assjuice.

      Did you ride the subways back in the 80s? Have you been shot at on the subway? No? Then it's gorgeous compared to what it used to be. And the cars on many lines have been updated and replaced in the last 5 or 6 years.

      There is probably less poverty in Iraq. It probably smells better in a monkey cage at the zoo


      You think the poverty rate is lower in New York than in Iraq? Where the fuck are you hanging out, the South Bronx? Hell, even Harlem is nothing like it used to be, I find myself up in the 160s and 170s frequently, and I often go out for food in that area, and it's relatively safe even for a whitey like myself.

      Almost every neighborhood in Manhattan (south of 100th St.) that used to be shitty and poor has been gentrified immensely in the last 10 years, from the meatpacking district to Hell's Kitchen to the Lower East Side. Places rapidly become trendy and cool and get expensive and the fancy boutiques and so on follow. And the neighborhoods that used to be nice now start at a million bucks to live in. Yeah, all those stupid squalid poor fucks in their million dollar apartments.

      Get real, asswipe. You are letting your personal dislike for the city make you spew pure factual falsehoods.

    58. Re:Count me in. by phuturephunk · · Score: 1

      Why in gods name would you want to move from the city to The Island?..

    59. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get bent

    60. Re:Count me in. by ljavelin · · Score: 1

      That's the part I never quite understood about companies that want to be built in downtown areas. The commute sucks cause everyone has to drive to a subway station first. Then take a subway as the 2nd part of commute.

      Um, I walk to the subway, as do 90% of my coworkers. I do own a car, but I only put on about 3000 miles a year.

      There are a couple people I work with who drive to the subway, but that's because they live way out in the middle of nowhere (mostly 'cause their spouses work 30 miles in the opposite direction)

      Plus, we're in the city, so we can easily go run errands during lunch, or visit the Dr's office, or visit a friend, or the library, or post office, or even have a decent (and cheap) lunch in one of 25 nearby lunch spots. Or lunch in the park. Sooo many option!

      So I don't see what's so bad. It's much better than where I used to work - a 25 minute drive each way (assuming no accidents or snow on the road), a cafeteria that had really crappy food, and the only place to eat outside of work was called "Mobil" and had 'dogs for a dollar.

    61. Re:Count me in. by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just using this Salary Calculator here are some examples of what you would need to make if you were to move from Queens where you made $100K:

      Little Rock - $73,660
      Albuquerque - $83,996
      Durham, NC - $86,865
      New Orleans - $88,257
      Billings, MT - $71,391

      They come up with these by measureing five categories: housing costs (33%), utilities (8%), consumables (16%), transportation (10%), and other services (33%). Most of the savings you see are because of housing cost differences. I did rent for these comparisons because most people living in a large city like New York and don't own.

    62. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got that right. If you drop $250K-$350K for a brand new, built from scratch house in Little Rock...you'll get a small mansion with a large yard.

      But on the downside, your mansion and yard are in Little Rock.

    63. Re:Count me in. by El · · Score: 1

      Ah yes... I used to work in Downtown Seattle too, right next to the Kingdome. My office window was on the back alley, so I had a great view of the dumpsters and crackheads. Parking cost $6/day. Also, if you left work after dark, lots of people would try to sell you, uh, things on your way to your car.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    64. Re:Count me in. by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      Holy Crap!

      I grew up in Fremont, which is just down the road from Wahoo. Talk about the land of no opportunity!

    65. Re:Count me in. by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      Bah. And give up that thick, noxious odor of ox-urine in the subways? And the constant traffic jams in midtown? And the annoying hipster dipshit kids that have invaded the Williamsburg and Astoria like locusts?

      Actually, I've lived in NYC for about six years, now, and I'm hooked on it. If I leave for more than about five days at a time, I get really homesick for it. This is probably a mental illness (or masochism), but I can't help it.

      And there are a hell of a lot of great things that cannot be duplicated, anywhere:

      1) cocktails in Bryant Park on a Summer evening;
      2) walking across the Brooklyn bridge to have pizza at Grimaldi's in Dumbo;
      3) being able to buy food, booze, cigarettes, jimmy hats, clothes, furniture, or just about anything else at ANY hour of day or night, even on holidays.
      4) crusing down the FDR Drive, along the river, on a full-moon night;
      5) the view from the top of the Empire State Building--holy shit, man!
      6) walking into singles' bars in ANY OTHER CITY IN ANY OTHER CITY IN THE WORLD (LA, San Fran, Houston, Peoria, London, Beijing) and being automatically cooler than everybody else.

      I could go on and on, but you get the point. This place is awesome.

    66. Re:Count me in. by ljavelin · · Score: 1

      The problem with the U.S. (rural america or not) is the lack of educated labor.

      You see, if you move to a place, you need to hire educated people. In the US, the large educated labor pools are in the city - but it costs a lot of money to operate a business in the city.

      If you move to rural areas, the labor pool is much much smaller - so you have to recruit people in (which costs $).

      However, areas like India and China have vast educated labor pools. Sure, their English isn't American English. But then again, most skilled labor isn't focused on telephone personalities. And their labor is pennies on the dollar - much lower than even the cheapest rural American labor.

      Will some jobs move to rural america? Sure, they have been for years. Will they increase? Not when compared to the overall elmination of American jobs.

    67. Re:Count me in. by colin_n · · Score: 1

      You may find it hard to believe, but some people value more than just their network speed. And actually, larger cities are more efficient places to set up MANs (Metropolitan Area Networks), and to meet with your customers. I moved to Houston from NYC. We waste an inordinate amount of time by commuting to / from work (people dont live close to their work) as well as to and from business meetings. The reasons that cities came about still exist, and it is all about being in proximity to your customers. Why am I in Houston anyway? My customers are here therefore I am.

      --

      --------- I have no signature
    68. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being someone who has lived in a rural area all my life (and commuted into KC for the last 14 years), I can say the downside of this is the massive influx of "coasterly" types into the area. These are RED areas, remember, and lots of people in rural areas find people from the coasts "amusing" (at best) and highly offensive (at worst). The feeling fades eventually, but only if the outsider makes an effort to fit in. Don't expect to come from NYC or LA and treat the natives like crap. You might end up getting run over by a justifiably pissed-off yokul in his Chevy truck.

    69. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we have a beautiful bricked Olympic Park, a decent subway system, and a thriving downtown, and a glitzy Buckhead.

    70. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing better than southern girls in the summer...

      Except for the herpes, of course.

    71. Re:Count me in. by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, if you left work after dark, lots of people would try to sell you, uh, things on your way to your car.

      That's why people live and work in cities. Try getting that kind of convenience in a rural area.

    72. Re:Count me in. by provolt · · Score: 1

      What are your skills? I know of quite a few companies in the midwest looking for people with the right skills.

    73. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well all I need now is about 2 million dollars so I can get one of those average places to live. Count me in!

    74. Re:Count me in. by over_exposed · · Score: 1

      Don't forget more mail/shipping/courier options and faster service!

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    75. Re:Count me in. by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      good call. studying TOD in class now...

    76. Re:Count me in. by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Wow no labor unions in Georgia. Amazing. I guess it's great for the construction industry though. They can exploit the homeless and don't have to bother with paying them a decent salary or insurance or anything. You guys sure are lucky. When one of your construction guys loses a finger or an arm the company doesn't have to pay them shit. No insurance, no benefits, below minimum wages, what a great way to run your state.

      You guys have found a great way to solve the homeless problem. COngratulations. I guess all those religious family values you guys are famous for don't conflict with exploitation of the poor and desparate for profit.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    77. Re:Count me in. by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      And cheap living. A friend of mine makes about 80k as an admin mogul, and this is a very decent living in the SF Bay Area. He and his wife are looking to buy a house soon, and will probably spend about $500,000. Go anywhere else and you can buy a goddamn mansion for about $100,000.

      Sure, the night life might suck, but if I could live in a rural area making what I am now, I would very seriously consider buying cowboy boots and becoming a rifle enthusiast.

    78. Re:Count me in. by jdray · · Score: 1

      If you look at the Oregon campuses of Intel, they're all named things like "Jones Farm" and "Ronler Acres" because they used to be farmland, and not so many years ago. It wasn't too long ago that Jones Farm (the furthest out) was almost entirely surrounded by agriculture. Now it's surrounded by housing developments. And Intel's not the only one with campuses out there; several high-tech companies make their homes there.

      And about the commute, it sucked six years ago when I was working out there, and I hear it's worse now. A fifteen mile trip took the better part of an hour most days, and three hours coming home on holiday weekends. Our light rail system went in and alleviated some of the problem temporarily, but the glut rebounded. Now I work in the heart of downtown Portland and live in a close-in neighborhood. The commute by bus is about fifteen minutes, by carpool about ten. I can leave the building to go get lunch at any number of restaurants, wander by the bookstore, maybe stop and visit with the gal at the flower stand, all on my lunch hour. When I was out at The Farm, it took ten minutes to get to your car and another ten minutes to drive to wherever you might want to have lunch. The lines were always long for crappy suburban food that you gobbled down as quickly as you could, and the return commute was the same as the outbound leg. Lunchtime became a review of last night's leftovers in the breakroom microwave and eating at your desk while surfing the net.

      I'll take the downtown experience any day of the week.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    79. Re:Count me in. by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Dude! No high speed internet... NONE and because there is very little profit to be made supplying it to small populations it becomes NONE... EVER.

      Fuck that.

    80. Re:Count me in. by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I have lived in both and country living sucks. You need to drive everywhere. The entire town shuts down at five so you have to blow your lunch hour doing business. Everybody knows your business all the time. No decent food unless you like hamburgers enough to eat them every day. More churches then bars and no nightclubs. NO culture to speak of. No art, no symphonies, no jazz, no concerts, no decent bookstores. No stores carry what you need and you have to order everything you can't get at the walmart. Rural folks are like the stepford nightmare. Everybody thinks alike, looks alike, talks alike, dresses alike, eat's alike and drinks alike. Nonstop conformity and boredom.

      Rural living sucks. I hated every moment of it. If you want to get away from a big city at least go to a collage town. There you tend to have better food and at least some culture. You will have at least one collage radio station which will play music that is not top 40 or country. You are more likely to run into people who have open minds. Hell you might even run into a black person or god forbid a foreigner once in a while too.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    81. Re:Count me in. by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Do y'all not know what a garden is up there? Or where meat comes from?

      We don't HAVE to go to the grocery store here. Just out to the back yard...

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    82. Re:Count me in. by mikeswi · · Score: 1

      Sorry, were you replying to a different post?

      I didn't say there were not unions. They're here, they just don't obstruct things the way they do elsewhere.

      I didn't say people weren't paid decent salary. They're paid whatever the fair wage is for whatever work they're doing.

      Temporary workers usually don't have benefits like insurance or profit sharing. That's nationwide, not specific to the south. Sorry to interrupt your southbashing.

      This has nothing to do with religion and I am atheist myself. Sorry to interrupt your biblebashing. But since you brought it up, what's wrong with employing the poor and desperate? They want work, so they're put to work. Where's the problem here?

    83. Re:Count me in. by fiter · · Score: 1

      It's called societal/cultural evolution. We are able to supercede natural selection thanks to this. (note: evolution does not choose, it is the result) If you want you can never see a doctor if you break your arm, become sick, etc. Oh, don't use soap or other non-behavioral forms of sanitation to prevent disease because that plays a very large part in natural selection. Picking and choosing just because you don't have the more extreme problems is hypocritical at best.

    84. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can come here to Arkansas. I promise we don't bite. The cost of living is low here, most people make minimum wage, that is, unless your doing something lucrative like farming or truck driving. Most people go to Walmart to buy thier stuff because its the cheapest place in town and the workers are friendly.

    85. Re:Count me in. by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      But if you get into real rural areas, you'll see the cost of housing drop another 50%. I'll bet that I pay less for a mortgage in a year than someone in a city like New York or San Fransisco will pay for rent in two months.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    86. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having grown up in rural America, I have to disagree. The local "culture" consists of driving up and down "the strip" while getting trashed.

      That's what they do there: get trashed, because there's nothing else to do.

      And the food? You must be joking. You couldn't find a dozen people in rural America that know what a vegetable is. The few that do believe that proper preparation involves boiling it to tasteless blob. No spices allowed, except salt and pepper.

      No, I'm pretty happy to be coastal. Surfing, mountain biking, music, theater. People actually turn off their televisions when you visit. Fresh food delivered from local farms outside of town. I haven't missed "the country" once.

    87. Re:Count me in. by Raven_Stark · · Score: 1

      I used to be able to walk to the grocery store in 30 seconds, but only if my crack head neighbors were too stoned to hit me up for money. The lack of privacy was dehumanizing; why not just invite the neighborhood to come watch you take a dump or whatever, they'll know anyway. As you say, differnet strokes for different folks, but I prefer to stoke in private.

      Now I love living in the sticks. I can play my mp3s as loudly as I want and no one gives a damn. I can throw 50 pounds of KNO3 on the BBQ and again, no one gives a damn. I'm building an ugly old robot which can be seen from the road, but no one complains. I suspect I could strip off all my clothes and go apeshit in the front yard and no one would call the cops or say a word. Yet, I could go to any neighbor's house and get help if I needed it. Many here poke fun at all the "redneck's" pickup trucks and gun racks, but they are mostly damn fine people. And they actually use their freaking pickup trucks unlike the city idiots who drive those stupid gas guzzling 4x4's with 4 square feet of bed space to impress the Joneses, goddamn that is moronic.

      Still, if you can stand the perpetual anal probe that is suburban life then more power to you if you want to move to the big city. Here in Florida, the burbs fill what used to be lovely cattle ranches and woodlands. Each person has this stupid ass postage stamp of a yard with the next pink cookie cutter house maybe 10 feet away. They aren't allowed to *do* anything with their yard except make it look pretty with a bunch of useless plants. Heaven forbid anyone raise a chicken or grow a squash. No, they just make what was useful land useless. They usually can't even put up a fense for privacy. Why they don't simply buy a condo downtown is beyond me.

      --
      http://www.marxist.com/
    88. Re:Count me in. by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "I didn't say there were not unions. They're here, they just don't obstruct things the way they do elsewhere."

      So you have unions but they don't look out for the welfare of their union members.

      "I didn't say people weren't paid decent salary. They're paid whatever the fair wage is for whatever work they're doing."

      So you pick up homeless people off the street and then pay them the same amount that you would pay one of your regular crew or a union member.

      "But since you brought it up, what's wrong with employing the poor and desperate? They want work, so they're put to work. Where's the problem here?"

      There is nothing wrong with "emplyoying" the poor. There is a lot wrong with picking them up for the day, paying them chicken shit, not providing them any benefits, not covering them under your accident policy and then discarding them at the end of the day when you are done with them.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    89. Re:Count me in. by evilquaker · · Score: 1
      How long does it take you to drive to the grocery store? I can WALK to it in thirty seconds.

      Let me guess... you live in an apartment above a grocery store and below another grocery store.

      --
      To within half a percent, pi seconds is a nanocentury. -- Tom Duff
    90. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect I could strip off all my clothes and go apeshit in the front yard and no one would call the cops or say a word.

      Yeah, yeah, we can do that in downtown Santa Cruz, too. So what?

    91. Re:Count me in. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      That's the part I never quite understood about companies that want to be built in downtown areas

      Sometimes, your major customers/clients have an office downtown as well. It's much easier walking across the street for a meeting/demo/presentation, than driving in from the suburbs.
      Our company recently did this. Moved a bunch of people from the burbs right to the middle of downtown. Result? They can interface with their clients at a moments notice, rather than blow an hour driving roundtrip. And for a $40M client, you want to be right there.

    92. Re:Count me in. by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      There ain't a lot that you can do in this town
      You drive down to the lake and then you turn back around
      You go to school and you learn to read and write
      So you can walk into the county bank and sign away your life
      I work at the fillin' station on the interstate
      Pumpin' gasoline and countin' out of state plates
      They ask me how far into Memphis son, and where's the nearest beer
      And they don't even know that there's a town around here

      Someday I'm finally gonna let go
      'Cause I know there's a better way
      And I wanna know what's over that rainbow
      I'm gonna get out of here someday

      Now my brother went to college cause he played football
      I'm still hangin' round cause I'm a little bit small
      I got me a 67 Chevy, she's low and sleek and black
      Someday I'll put her on that interstate and never look back

      -- Steve Earle

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    93. Re:Count me in. by Damek · · Score: 1

      Um, no. I don't know what city you're talking about, but here in New York the city was *not* designed for living where you work and walking to work. There are apartments everywhere, but the ones in Downtown and Midtown are very expensive, and the more livable ones are all in bulk areas farther away from the main work areas. Chances are most people work in either midtown or downtown, and then live somewhere in upper Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn or the Bronx. Nobody lives in Staten Island.

      I'd love transit-oriented development, but it didn't happen here. Trains (at least) are a must, unless you're lucky enough to live at least 45 minutes walking distance from where you work - and even that's stretching it... who wants to walk 45 minutes to and from work every day when the train is right there?

    94. Re:Count me in. by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      does this mean people living in God's Country will quit looking for validation of their trading culture and weather for lower cost of living? I'm getting ready to have a fit at the next person who wants to tell me that they've got a place they like for cheap. Fine. I'm happy that you're happy, but I don't care for the implication that I'm crazy to buy a $.5M 3+ bedroom bungalow. If I was willing to make the same choice as you, I would have done so already. I'm very happy with my choice and I don't care about yours, so quit complaining that you'd like to live in the same city as me if only it wasn't so expensive... it is, so get over it. Be happy with what you've got, or make the necessary changes.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    95. Re:Count me in. by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Yeah but how far do you have to drive to get to work? What are the salaries like? How many jobs are actually available in that area? If a company decides to move a plant or call center there wouldn't it raise the land values in the area? That would be great if you already live there but not for people who want to move there. I live in a pretty rural part of New York that is only an hour north of the city. My mortgage is way lower but it is offset somewhat by the cost of commuting (both time and money).

    96. Re:Count me in. by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      But then aren't we just ensuring our own demise? If because of societal/cultural evolution we allow the recessive genes to thrive and propagate, what is to prevent these recessive genes from gaining ground with each passing generation? And instead of existing in 1% of the population, these recessive genes may exist in 10% of the population after maybe 5 generations. Then, the likelyhood of giving birth to a child with defects is much higher. How is society better off at that point? Maybe medical science can fix these problems, but we won't necessarily be able to fix them all.

      Unintentionally breaking an arm is governed under a different set of rules. Evolution of our genes are actually mutations that are successes and failures. Some of the mutations add capabilities to the human system (perhaps after one mutation our liver is now able to clean a new toxin out of our blood stream). But in the process of trying to evolve to add capabilities, we fail several times and detract capabilties from the human system or even damage the human system. It is like blindly throwing darts. If you throw 1, the chance that you will hit a bull's eye (a successful mutation) is pretty small. If you throw 100, the chance that you will hit a bull's eye is larger. However, any dart that does not hit the bull's eye is an unsuccessful mutation that does not add capabilities to the human system (or worse, detracts capabilties - as is the case with many degenerative diseases that we know of today). The way this evolution succeeds is that any positive mutation will inherently allow the human to live a longer, better life that will ultimately result in more reproduction. And any negative mutation will inherently keep the human living a shorter, worse life that will ultimately result in less (or no) reproduction. Thereby, the positive mutations are allowed to continue and propagate while the negative mutations are weeded from the gene pool.

      Breaking an arm is entirely based on your physical environment and not your genes (unless some gene mutation results in weaker, more brittle bones). If a rock simply happens to fall off a hill side and snap your arm in half, that is not evolution. The only type of "natural selection" (if you want to call these coincidences so) that would occur here is that humans would stop living in dangerous areas. However, if you break your arm because you jumped off a cliff (as a direct result of being ignorant of the effects of such an action), then you might be able to call that evolution since you are weeding out the "dumb" people.

    97. Re:Count me in. by macklin01 · · Score: 1

      Whoa, whoa, whoa! Slow down there, buddy!

      I said that you or anybody is crazy to spend that much on a home. I dream of owning a home at some point, too. If it costs that much to do so, then I'll save and plan for it. That's the reality of life in southern California and many other places.

      people living in God's Country will quit looking for validation of their trading culture and weather for lower cost of living?

      This is actually pretty demeaning to those in other regions. There's a good deal more going on culturally away from the coasts than many realize. (City orchestras, University theatres, visiting operas, art galleries, and hell, this thing called "the Internet" and DVD purchases can bring culture just about anywhere.) And nobody called it "God's country" here.

      ...so quit complaining that you'd like to live in the same city as me if only it wasn't so expensive... it is, so get over it. Be happy with what you've got, or make the necessary changes.

      You've actually made a deduction that doesn't follow from the post: I haven't made any such statements. In fact, you're exactly wrong: I live in Orange County, and while I detest some of the factors that have lead to the outrageous land prices, I am doing something about it: I'm attending graduate school and getting the education to do what I want to do and afford the lifestyle I want.

      But thank you for your vitriolic post. We can all use a little of that on a Friday evening. -- Paul

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    98. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *groan* I previewed post, and yet I still missed this:

      I never said that you or anybody is crazy to spend that much on a home. I dream of owning a home at some point, too. If it costs that much to do so, then I'll save and plan for it. That's the reality of life in southern California and many other places.

    99. Re:Count me in. by Botty · · Score: 1

      MMmmmm pi(e)truck.

      (Look at the ^H's ;) )

    100. Re:Count me in. by mlilback · · Score: 1

      I did that six months ago, moving my software company, too. Went from a $2400/month 1-bedroom in Manhattan to a $700/month 3-bedroom in rural Texas. Took a 1/3 paycut and used the money to hire two employees and things are working out great. The business stuff is still run in NYC, but all the programming happens down here.

      Prices are a lot lower, and I'm old enough that I don't mind the slower pace. However, it does suck being in a red state with a large evangelical population. (I think this town of 20K has more churches than Manhattan.)

      The thing I miss the most is the ability to take a cab or the subway home instead of having to worry about drinking and driving. After twelve years of public transportation, it is taking a while to get used to driving everywhere.

      And if there are any Cocoa developers out there willing to relocate to hicksville, I'll likely be hiring soon.

    101. Re:Count me in. by Mandomania · · Score: 1

      You mean the ones that I can't afford to live in? Are those the ones you're talking about?

      When I worked on Wall St., I lived across the river in Jersey City because that's where I could afford to live, not because I wanted to live there. And even then, I had to either drive or take a cab to the ferry stop because I wasn't about to risk leaving my bike chained up all day.

      Lord knows no one wants to live in Jersey City :).

    102. Re:Count me in. by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Those problems are because you (apparently) live in the 'burbs. Not all cities are livable, but I'm much happier living in Chicago than I was out in the suburbs. I take the El to work, it's within walking distance. No driving, no traffic jams. I put on my headphones, or study, or play GBA, and I'm at work before I know it.

      Last year I had a contract out in Schaumburg. Talk about a pain in the ass commute! I probably wasted 3 hours a day sitting in traffic. No, I'm much happier working downtown.. lots of places to eat lunch, great views, the hustle and bustle.. I love it. :)

    103. Re:Count me in. by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Condos in UPTOWN are going for 550K now.

      Oh, come on. A friend of mine just bought a very nice two bedroom condo in Uptown recently for < 300. Or are you trying to influence your property value? ;)

    104. Re:Count me in. by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Nebraska, and it's amazing what kind of a beautiful home and acreage you can get for $250,000.

      On the downside, you have to live in Nebraska..

      I'll be here all week, try the salmon!

    105. Re:Count me in. by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      I walk two blocks and do ok. Even if I did need to drive to a neighboring community, time is not an issue - I could hold a job 60 miles away and the commute would be 1 hour (hardly what I would call a murderous drive). As far as jobs go - I'd like to see a rural outsourcing outfit move a even a small office into out community.

      You are right that if an outfit put in even a 100 person call center, it would overwhelm our (small town) infrastructure. On the other hand, an outfit bringing in only 10 positions would be a great for our local economy and would make a great deal of difference to our community.

      As far as land values go - we've got two components to that. Housing values are currently rather low, but land values for good farmland are high (1970's high) - it would take quite an expansion in the area to bump the values beyond the agricultural component.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    106. Re:Count me in. by uncoolcentral · · Score: 1
      Yep. You said it. I moved to an Appalachian college town over a decade ago. The money isn't city-good, but it goes a long, L O N G way. It was also nice to get a sweet secluded house with a huge pool, huge hot tub, orchard, terraced gardens, pond, horse shoe pits and etc. three miles from work for about $100k. I'd have to get a HUGE raise to consider moving back to the city... and then it would only be temporary.

      IBM offered me twice the money for a gig in NYC a few years ago. I turned them down b/c of the compensation.
      "But it's twice what you make now?!?"
      "Yeah, but it would cost me twice as much to keep the same standard of living in NYC..."

      My company uses in-house support. (Nice to have the support in the same building as all the servers etc.) (Also nice to have a big college right down the road for a regular stream of [educated] employees too.)

    107. Re:Count me in. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Why don't you move to Manhattan (Kansas)?

    108. Re:Count me in. by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      "Come visit the south, if you can get past the idiots, you should actually love it. There's nothing better than southern girls in the summer..."

      At 100 degrees, 100% humidity.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    109. Re:Count me in. by mikeswi · · Score: 1

      > So you have unions but they don't look out for the welfare of their union members.

      No, in fact they serve their purpose, managing labor relations. What they do not do is go on strike when kickbacks are not paid and they do not interfere with a contractor's ability to use temporary workers. Unions hate it when someone employs a non-union worker. They don't get their cut and they make trouble about it.

      > So you pick up homeless people off the street and then pay them the same amount that you would pay one of your regular crew or a union member.

      Glad you're getting it. I wasn't the employer but I was the job site manager for a company. The people picked up at Montgomery Square in the morning got the same wages per hour as a permanent worker, plus a ride to and from work.

      > There is nothing wrong with "emplyoying" the poor. There is a lot wrong with picking them up for the day, paying them chicken shit, not providing them any benefits, not covering them under your accident policy and then discarding them at the end of the day when you are done with them.

      They're paid whatever the going wage is for whatever work they're doing. That is determined by the local market, not by the worker's address.

      They ARE covered for job-related accidents by the company liability policy (at least where I worked). If they were injured, the boss paid the doctor's bill. Normal health insurance was not provided. If they wanted that, they could apply for a permanent job.

      > and then discarding them at the end of the day when you are done with them.

      That was up to them. If they wanted to come back, they'd arrange to be in the same spot the next day. If they wanted a permanent job, they were hired if they did a good job.

      I don't understand your objections. They wanted to work, so they were put to work. Would you rather they stayed on the street with no money at all?

    110. Re:Count me in. by zardoz342 · · Score: 1

      Welpers, I live in a ~1200 population town in SW Washington (State) about 30 minutes from Olympia (State Capitol) and we get 1.5 Mbps down / 768 Mbps up ADSL for $40/month, and this IS one tiny timber town, so some places DO have decent net access even with small populations, also house prices are about 1/4 what they are in 'the city', and Seattle is a 2 hour drive away when I need the 'city fix'. Just my 00000010 Cents :)

    111. Re:Count me in. by mikeswi · · Score: 1

      > They ARE covered for job-related accidents by the company liability policy (at least where I worked). If they were injured, the boss paid the doctor's bill.

      Strike that. The boss didn't pay personally, but his company's insurance did.

    112. Re:Count me in. by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      One stipulation: I want broadband. Real broadband. As in 3megs or higher.

      And A starbucks, and more shopping than Wal-Mart. And good schools. And to not get shot at when I drive through town with my "He's not my president" sticker on my car. And to not be burned at the stake for not attending church. And to not be lumped in with the Xian fundies that live there.

      Wait... I can't get any of those things right now, and I live in the suburbs!

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    113. Re:Count me in. by anvilmark · · Score: 1

      ~20k population town here. 3Mbps down/756 Kbps up. $45/month.

      Rural isn't as primitive as it used to be.

    114. Re:Count me in. by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      We're already ensured of our demise. You will die, I will die. We'll all die.

      What I've extracted is that you place maximum "reproduction" as an imperative. Not everyone agrees.

      Perhaps you're right. Perhaps killing off the people you suggest will help you reach that ideal. Why does essentially no one else care about your particular analyses? Because they don't share your ideals.

      Evolution is not heading anywhere. It's just a meandering based on mutation/natural selection. Giving it some sort of telos is completely your own operation; not part of some essence inherent to it.

    115. Re:Count me in. by Saeger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I grew up in a medium-small town, but have lived in the big apple for about 10 years. I don't know about you, but I definitely feel like I have more privacy in the city as a STRANGER among strangers VS a small town where everybody's business is known.

      It's quite liberating to be able to be car-free in the city. The suburban "american dream" with a status-symbol car and a useless lawn is BS. We need to counter that spawl with smarter New Urbanism.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    116. Re:Count me in. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      "transit-oriented development"...


      means that the garages in your new gated subdivision in the country are able to acommodate 2 of the largest SUV in manufacture today!

    117. Re:Count me in. by ppz003 · · Score: 1

      Also, if you left work after dark, lots of people would try to sell you, uh, things on your way to your car.

      That's why people live and work in cities. Try getting that kind of convenience in a rural area.


      Try getting high speed internet or even dialup that doesn't disconnect when the trees shake in the wind. I'm hoping for that BPL to come through soon!

      btw, I'm currently connected at 16.8 kbps ... :'(

    118. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love working downtown. I walk to the subway station and arrive at work in 20 minutes. Sometimes I do my grocery shopping on my lunch break.

    119. Re:Count me in. by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I don't believe one word you are saying. Not one.

      The idea that you would pay homeless people to work at a construction site with full insurance coverage and the same pay as regular employees is ridiculus. You are lying plain and simple.

      Oh and unions that don't strike are not looking out for their members. Unions that don't object to non union people working in their shops are not looking out for their members.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    120. Re:Count me in. by lostguy · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never worked in Manhattan in the summer.

      *Sproing*

      It's all worth it for the eye candy.

    121. Re:Count me in. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "But on the downside, your mansion and yard are in Little Rock."

      Yeah...that clean air, beautiful scenery, great looking women who care what they look like, and good quality of life is a real drag. If you have a bad attitude or superiority complex...just stay where you are. If you have a good attitude and want to be nice to people.....c'mon down.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    122. Re:Count me in. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I work in one of thoes offices in the middle of nowhere, but it is in Australia. The beach is 100m from my door and work is ten minutes away. I moved her after I got the job, before that it was a 2hr round trip by car. I worked in the city for about 10 yrs that was also a 2hr round trip, 3hrs by car! Personally I wonder why they even bother having a space for every employee since half of them work at least a few days from home. OTOH: You can plop a call center anywhere and locals can be trained to work there, but a software house will need to gather it's workers from a larger area since they can't just train someone and expect them to be productive after morning tea. ie: The average worker's commute time is proportional to the skill level of the job.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    123. Re:Count me in. by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1
      I think the point is that what you are describing is a result of *very* poor (or more likely, non-existent) urban planning. A real city should consist of medium- to high-density areas so that public transportation is cost-effective and people can afford to live relatively close to where they work and purchase services.

      The price of this poor urban planning is sprawl, a completely unhealthy reliance on cars (unhealthy both environmentally, economically, and politically), and social decay.

    124. Re:Count me in. by mikeswi · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry that you think that. The fact is that we paid anyone willing to work the same wages, irregardless of their address, or lack thereof. I don't work there anymore, so I can't produce the financial records from 1994-96 but I assure you that what I said is true.

      > Oh and unions that don't strike are not looking out for their members. Unions that don't object to non union people working in their shops are not looking out for their members.

      I can't even imagine what would lead someone to say something like that. Unions don't strike when there is no need to strike. Or maybe you were approving of illegal kickbacks to shop bosses and mafia?

      As for the 2nd sentence, the union that objects to non-union labor is looking out for their own bank account, not their members. They don't like the loss of influence or the loss of dues-paying members when someone hires non-union labor. So where they have too much influence, they make artificial problems for those employers who do. That is why it is a very good thing all around that they do not have so much influence down here.

      The fact of the matter is, even if every single union-member construction worker on planet earth were hired, there still would not be enough workers for the construction and farm jobs in the south. If the people running those businesses didn't find workers wherever they were available, it would slow those projects and hurt the national and regional economies.

      I still don't understand where your objection is to hiring people who desperately need money. The goal of any responsible society is to help people on the street come off the street. The goal is not to make their lives on the street more pleasant. Maybe where you live people treat the homeless as slaves or irritatants or as a never-ending source of federal money. Here, we try to help them come off the streets so that they can take care of themselves.

    125. Re:Count me in. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      You've got that right. If you drop $250K-$350K for a brand new, built from scratch house in Little Rock...you'll get a small mansion with a large yard. Taxes are quite reasonable there...and if you move outside LR...cost of living drops at an almost exponential rate. Avg. regular apt. a few years back was like $250/mo or a little more.

      Noy to mention the world;s biggest double wide down by the river; and some really great bar b que.
      LR needs a better airport though to really compete = flights are tough to get.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    126. Re:Count me in. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Forget DC. I am in Santa Monica on business and I am amazed at the number of homeless. There are far more than I have ever seen in Manhattan.

      Better weather

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    127. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just buy some quality panniers for your bicycle.
      This summer I hauled about 25 Kilos of camping equipment, food, and clothes 2300 kilometers.

      It should be possible to transport groceries on your bike. A trailer for your bicycle is also a nice option, maybe better than panniers too, it can easily haul a LOT of stuff.

    128. Re:Count me in. by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

      This is what is wrong with america.

      Don't you think it's a little extreme to say that you're dislike of you're commute is a fundamental flaw with America?

      I live in central Baltimore. Nothing in my neigborhood is a few steps away, except crack dealers and a couple liquor stores with plexiglass windows. It is, however, a 10 minute drive to where I work (which is on the edge of the city, but within city limits). I'm not a big fan of city life, but I deal with it because I like having a short commute and cheap rent.

      That may change in a year or two when I'm ready to buy a house - I may be willing to trade my commute for ease of parking, neigbors who don't want to rob me, and a nice patch of green in the back.

      Not everyone dislikes the suburbs, and many people prefer them. The fact that people who want to live in cities can, and people who want to live in suburbs can, is part of what I like, not dislike, about America.

    129. Re:Count me in. by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "I still don't understand where your objection is to hiring people who desperately need money."

      I have no objection to hiring desparate people. Note however that your mythical company did not hire these people. I am sure every homeless person would love nothing better then to be offered a job and some benefits so they can feed their families and put a roof over their head. Instead your mythical company preferred to pick them up at the street corner and drop them off at the end of the day.

      Why?

      If they paid them the same and geve them the same benefits and covered them under the same unsurance why not hire them? There must be a reason to pick up homeless people and drop them off when your regular employees come to the work site on their own?

      Think about it. Think hard. There must be some advantage to your mythical company to pick up day laborers and not offer them jobs.

      Like I said I don't believe you for one second that a construction company would pay a day laborer the same pay or offer them the same benefits. Normally they pick up illegals and homeless so they can pay them below minimum wage and because they don't have to offer them insurance if they get hurt.

      It's also clear you hate unions and don't really understand what they are about. Unions are there to protect the employees. This means striking when you feel they are threatened and trying preventing employees from hiring non union employees.

      "Here, we try to help them come off the streets so that they can take care of themselves."

      If that's the way you want to define the word "exploitation" then suit yourself.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    130. Re:Count me in. by fiter · · Score: 1

      I agree my breaking an arm example wasn't the best, but in nature you'd be selected out anyway because you are weaker. That's the crap shot you take along with the mutations.

      The theory here is that we will either treat all the newly defected children or we can eliminate that harmful gene through genetic modification. Then again, it seems society has a few qualms with the later. If society can't fix them, then they'll be selected out of the gene pool anyway.

      I'm curious. Would you consider Steven Hawking unfit and thus say he shouldn't [have been/] be cared after?

    131. Re:Count me in. by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
      That is so incredibly short-sighted. I mean, what about when next year's better (bigger) models come out?

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

    132. Re:Count me in. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The general philosophy of zoning in the US is atrociously bad. By zoning large commercial areas away from large residential areas you create traffic. By putting businesses around residential areas you solve this.

      No, that doesn't work either. That's the way it is here in the Phoenix metro area, and we have tons of traffic.

      I think the idea of zoning commercial and residential areas apart was to create traffic along corridors which could be built with large highways to make the traffic flow efficient. Of course, we all know how well that worked out...

      Also, the idea of zoning industrial and the other types apart makes sense: keep the ugly industrial crap away from everything else. No one wants to live next to a chemical plant.

      However, mixing the commercial and residential doesn't really work either. Here in Phoenix, nearly the whole area (except stupid Snobs... er, I mean Scottsdale) is designed on a 1-mile grid system, where large boulevards are spaced along this grid, running north-south or east-west. Generally (esp. in the newer areas), commercial areas, including strip malls, offices, etc., are located along the boulevards, and especially at the intersections. Residential areas are typically located on the insides of these 1-square-mile blocks.

      It has its advantages, like not having to drive very far to get to a supermarket or drug store. However, most people don't work at supermarkets and gas stations; they work in large companies, or in areas that are more heavily commercial, so they end up driving a lot (and I mean a lot--this city is very spread out).

      Now, if you're smart, it's not hard to find a house near where you work (unlike many cities). For instance, I work at a huge megacorp, and my house is literally 2 miles away. However, what happens if I take a different job with a company that's in another part of the metro area? I'm back to the morning commute. Or, what if I have a girlfriend/wife? The chances of your live-in working in the same area are fairly slim. My girlfriend works north of downtown, so she has a 30-45 minute commute. She'd love to find a job near home, but that's easier said than done.

      I really don't have a solution for this mess. NYC with its high density seems pretty cool, however it's not exactly family friendly in Manhattan, and the cost of living is astronomical. You could live somewhere farther away like Staten Island, but then you've got that pesky commute again.

      If society really wanted to make a city where people didn't need cars, could have nice, safe, and affordable housing, and could have families, things would have to be completely different from how they are now. Perhaps lots of high-rises with very large apartments, lots of public transit, large underground structures... but then this seems to create exhorbitant costs of living that working-class people can't afford, bringing back all the problems we have now. I think if anyplace creates an idea city, it'll be China; they have the labor and economy to build it, and they have a government that can control it and set the prices instead of allowing "market forces" to raise them to ridiculous levels like we have here.

    133. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the rest of my sentence? I can't be bothered to respond to people who reply

      You just were bothered though, and you proved it by replying. Typical New Yorker. Says one thing and does another, doesn't stand for anything.

      to partial setences. Compared to 15 or 20 years ago, there are far fewer homeless people on the streets of New York. Don't tell me I'm full of shit,
      You are, I see them everyday. Also, re-read your orginal statement and get some english lessons. Your qualifier about 15-20 years ago only applied to the subways.

      15-20 years ago really doesn't matter anyway, if NYC still sucks now, who cares how much it sucked back then?

      I first moved to New York in 1992 (though I visited before that), but my friends who've lived here their whole lives confirm this to me. If you weren't here in the 80s, or even the early 90s, then you don't know what you are talking about.

      Uhh, I'm there now. Admitted pre 2002 I would only visit/party in the city. I know what I'm talking about because I spend everyday commuting there, and it's crap. I'd gladly live in bumblefuck rather than have to commute to that shithole.

      Did you ride the subways back in the 80s?

      No, but that has nothing to do with the fact that it's still a shithole today

      Have you been shot at on the subway? No?

      Is that how you judge if your subway experence has been good? If you haven't had an attempt on your life? That just goes to show what a craphole the city is.

      You think the poverty rate is lower in New York than in Iraq? Where the fuck are you hanging out, the South Bronx? Hell, even Harlem is nothing like it used to be, I find myself up in the 160s and 170s frequently, and I often go out for food in that area, and it's relatively safe even for a whitey like myself.

      There are Bums everywhere in NYC. Seriously. Even the "classy" sections of Manhattan have them.

      Get real, asswipe. You are letting your personal dislike for the city make you spew pure factual falsehoods.

      There is a great deal of poverty everywhere in NYC, the subways smell horrible, are not clean and many are outdated. The MTA is corrupt, and the air quality in the city blows goats. I'd gladly leave for greener pastures (Or my native NJ) If I could find a work environment as good as my own. I don't think I've been to a worse place on earth.

    134. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allow me to paraphrase:

      *BLAHBLAHBLAH* I am a member of the poor underclass of New York and I hate my life *BLAHBLAHBLAH*

      Shut the fuck up you piece of human trash. When we want your opinion we'll give it to you.

      - The Rest of New York City

    135. Re:Count me in. by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Sure, why should Hawking get special treatment? Everyone is governed under the same evolution rules. Just because he happens to be a bit more intelligent doesn't mean he gets to cut line.

  5. Good For America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hurray! As part of the Bush initiative to grow the job market in America, skilled, college educated professionals can now make as much money as their counterparts in third-world countries!

    America - I love this place!

    1. Re:Good For America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe these are the "better jobs" that he was talking about having laid off factory workers do. Great... so what am I (with a masters in CS) going to go to community college to learn how to do?

    2. Re:Good For America! by tazan · · Score: 1

      Seeing as how both major parties are for free trade and the equalization of the standard of living in all counties I don't see how you can blame this on Bush.

    3. Re:Good For America! by raile · · Score: 1

      Let's see, these jobs will be going from Blue states to Red states. Hmmmmm......

      Well, if it works out, it sounds like a win-win to me: those who supported Kerry's plan to keep jobs from moving overseas got their wish, and those who voted for Bush get to continue to screw those who didn't.

      (FYI, I'm a Blue living in a Red state)

    4. Re:Good For America! by New+Breeze · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but you can move to a rural area in the US, try moving to India. I moved from the Baltimore/DC area this year, and I got three times the house I could have afforded back there. Plus a laid back community instead of the uptight 'everyone must paint their homes one of the three approved colors' BS that was common there. People raise families here on 40k a year, you can't even keep a roof over your head on the coast for that, unless you're rooming with 3 other people.

      And don't kid yourself, about the only thing I don't have is a wide choice of brick and mortar shopping for PC stuff, and the bookstores around here don't have a ton of software books on the shelves. Since I bought most of that online for better prices before, it just means I can't waste time browsing on the weekend.

    5. Re:Good For America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to stereotype. There a lot of moderate Democrats, moderate Republicans who voted Democrat in 2004, and moderate independents who voted Democrat in 2004 out there. And I'd bet good money that most of them earn at least 50k.

    6. Re:Good For America! by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      killed, college educated professionals can now make as much money as their counterparts in third-world countries!

      See I wouldn't mind so much living in Montana or Tennesse or out in the Midwest somewhere as long I can get broadband. Even if I make half of what I'm making working a tech Job in the SF Bay Area at least in the Mid-west I could buy a house with it. Here I can barely pay my rent.

      Although, the whole being black and gay* thing might be a bit of a problem...

      *Ok I'm not really gay...

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    7. Re:Good For America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can blame it on him because he could have done sothing about it and didn't

    8. Re:Good For America! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      "(FYI, I'm a Blue living in a Red state)"

      And I'm a red living in a blue state.
      Other than local family obligations I've often wanted to move. I visited my wife's great aunt in Wilsie Kansas a couple months back and aside from how damn flat it was I though the people were nicer, the weather pleasent, and the going easy, except for the lack of high tech (I am a tech addict, working at one of the highest teck firms in the industry). Move some of the R&D out there and I'll consider following.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    9. Re:Good For America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Let's see, these jobs will be going from Blue states to Red states.

      I say they should go for it. Let's see how red they remain when they start attracting a diverse and educated workforce. Georgia went to Bush ... did Atlanta? How'd Raleigh-Duram vote compared to the rest of North Carolina?

    10. Re:Good For America! by passion · · Score: 1

      Precisely... this nation isn't so red after all. Remember - land doesn't vote, people do. Notice that the blue areas are generally centered around the bigger cities? Not the farm-land, where people learn about politics in the churches, instead of from the news...

      --
      - passion
    11. Re:Good For America! by akajerry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ironically, the BJP party lost to the Congress party in the last Indian election because the BJP party's slogan of a "bright shining India" didn't resonate all that well with the rural Indians who haven't actually seen all that much benefit from the tech boom in India.

      The vast majority of the tech jobs are in the cities in India for the same reason they are in the cities in the US. 1) The cities have better infrastructure by virtue of the simple fact that it's more cost effective to roll out new infrastructure where the population density is higher. 2) If you're a growing business and need to hire 3000 new employees you can't do that in a town of 10,000. 3) And if you need to hire for a very specific skill set you want to do that in an area that has a high concentration of that skill set. 4) If you're a technology professional and you're looking for a job, particularly in a slow economy, you go to where there are the most number of opportunities, the cities, less you find yourself relocating every time you change jobs.

      The rural US does have significantly better infrastructure than rural India, but still the closer you are to a major city the better the infrastructure. But how do you hire technology workers by the thousands in rural Arkansas. So replace the "inconvenience" expense of distance, language and culture for India with the "inconvenience" expense of having to manage a highly distributed work force.

      In retrospect, I'm not at all surprised the tech boom didn't help rural India that much. Most Indian tech companies completely ignore the Indian domestic market because there still isn't one to speak of. Compares to the US, European and Middle Eastern markets the Indian market is still insignificantly small and can't nearly support the pricing levels that the international markets can. $30/hr might seem cheap to a US CIO, but it's not at all cheap to an Indian CIO.

      As a result there isn't a lot of innovation going on inside India to develop products and services at a price point appropriate to the domestic Indian consumer or business. WWII and the rebuilding of Europe helped the US a lot on its path to becoming an economic superpower, but for the most part the US economy was built to satisfy a strong US domestic market; the same was true for Japan. That's not a justification for protectionism; it's just a lot easier to break new ground with innovative products in your own backyard before you try to sell them to the rest of the world.

      The US should really start worrying the day India figures out how to tap into its own domestic market of over a billion people and starts innovating. And at the same time the US need to remember that innovation is what made America strong not economics protectionism.

    12. Re:Good For America! by EXrider · · Score: 1

      Right on man, I did the same thing. Found a nice house at an affordable price. I live on the edge of a small town right on the other side of the state border line; I used to live in Ohio with my parents in a suburban area. I moved 25 miles away from that shit-hole city, I pay waaay lower taxes than I would've there, we have way nicer schools, almost every high school graduate here gets a college scholarship (payed by the riverboat gambling), the crime rate is lower, I don't have to worry about stuff being stolen out of my garage anymore, I leave my vehicles unlocked at night. I have cable TV and internet access (albeit slower than most cable, but way faster than dialup).

      There's plenty of entertainment here, I live right down the road from riverboat casinos (who I thank for the low taxes and nice schools), and there's a ski slope right down the road, and a handful variety of nice restaurants and bars. My neighborhood is built around a man made lake, there's a private beach and a golf course. I don't mind the rednecks sprinkled around here, they're a hell of a lot nicer than the gang members, and wanabe mini-thugs back home.

      Now if I could only find a job here closer to home, there's a few large companies, I haven't really tried yet. I drive 80 miles a day to and from work, my co-workers think I'm crazy, but it's worth it to me to live in the nice country instead of the shithole suburbs. I should stop elaborating now, I don't want tons of people moving here and turning it into the fucked up place I moved away from!

      --
      grep -iw skynet /etc/services
    13. Re:Good For America! by killjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A large influx of younger tech workers will probably turn those red states blue. It's already happening in Montana where the influx of people resulted in the election of a democratic governor and a 50/50 split in the state senate. Also states like new mexico and alabama were really close this year.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    14. Re:Good For America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If ICT accounts for 11% or so of a companies expenditure, why is it that outsourcing of the other 89% not happening? Narrow thinking?

      Rural Outsourcing has failed because managers are impatient - the want the big boom - India all at once, or Hicksville - all at once. They also like the fact, money in big cities, can buy themselves out of a hole, mostly.

      Crazy hourly rates in the big smoke, and a failure to deal with these costs is more to the point - too backward to adopt remote - work at home policy, or put it out on the net for tender.
      Rural outsourcing will work, as soon as city centric work attitudes die out.

      Organic growth is the most profitable. Walmart HQ is proof. Eventually, the smart ones will move to lower cost bases.

  6. any time by chris_morgan47 · · Score: 1

    i'd gladly sell my expensive detroit suburb house and move to west virginia for this. in a minute.

    1. Re:any time by Metzli · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I was born-and-raised in the rural Midwest and the only reason I'm not there now is because there aren't too many Unix Sysadmin jobs up there.

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    2. Re:any time by TykeClone · · Score: 5, Insightful
      There are probably more people like you out there than most people would think. If this kind of thing took off, it would provide a decent job market for people like you and me who want to remain in rural areas. It's not the kind of life for everyone (but don't tell those people too much - I don't want it to get crowded).

      Like you, I am from the rural midwest, but was blessed with the opportunity to move back to my hometown and run a good sized network.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    3. Re:any time by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on! Rural is one thing, but West Virginia?!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:any time by boodaman · · Score: 1

      Ditto!! If I could have a couple dozen acres and a decent house within 10-15 minutes drive of my job, I'd sell my current place and move in a heartbeat.

    5. Re:any time by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Just move to downtown, you can get a house for a dollar :)

    6. Re:any time by AnonymousKev · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'll speak very slowly: Wrong Turn was not a documentary.

      --
      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997
      (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
    7. Re:any time by 0racle · · Score: 1

      You'll go back within a year. Personally I hate rural towns.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    8. Re:any time by datasetgo · · Score: 1

      Hey now - It's wild, wonderful and really - where else can you date your cousin in peace? ;-)

      [I'm originally from WV so I can say that.]

    9. Re:any time by gui_tarzan2000 · · Score: 1
      It also depends on where the rural area is. In Michigan, our rural lifestyle is poluted by the larger city lifestyle because we're so close to them. It's still loads better than living in the cities but it's nothing like living in rural Iowa/Nebraska or the southern states would be.

      I do admit though that in our experience the people in the southern small towns are a lot more friendly than here in the north. Once we get north of Kentucky attitudes start coming back big-time. I prefer the politeness of the southern folk. Maybe it would be different if I lived there, I don't know...

      --
      Have you hugged your penguin today?
    10. Re:any time by jbeverage · · Score: 1

      I'm currently working in West Virginia as a software developer and things are great here. Pay is good, people are nice, and the standard of living is awesome. Born, raised, and working in West Virginia and I couldn't be happier.

    11. Re:any time by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Alabamma. (I'm from Mississippi. We've got laws aginst it.)

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    12. Re:any time by shagrat · · Score: 0

      Not a chance. Clean air, no traffic, land, and nice people.I'd do it in a heartbeat.

    13. Re:any time by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What's Wrong Turn?

      Incidentally, my previous post is from the "it's funny, laugh" department.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    14. Re:any time by AnonymousKev · · Score: 1
      Wrong Turn is a movie from 2003 about horribly inbred West Virginian cannibals who fed on lost tourists. Judging from the large number of cars in their yard, they ate several times a day. It was very, v..e..r..y bad. The "heeww-heeeeeeww" laugh made by one of the cannibals was the high point of the film.

      It's odd that our original posts didn't bump into each other as they left their department :)

      --
      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997
      (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
    15. Re:any time by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Maybe you live on the north side of Detroit. Bloomfield Hills is extremely expensive. Try the west and south sides (well, suburbs) of Detroit - they are fairly inexpensive (although climbing fast) and there is still plenty of country-style land (a few acres here and there with 100 yards between your front door and the next guy's). And the commute is probably 35 minutes to downtown Detroit. The only problem with southeast Michigan is it is expanding like a freight train out of hell. So land is being gobbled up all over the place, new people are moving in all the time, and pollution and local government corruption is on the rise.

      Or you could just move downtown and buy a whole city block for $1.

  7. Well, as long as they speak English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so I can understand them, I'm all for it.

    1. Re:Well, as long as they speak English by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      We's speakz good English out heyre in da sticks. Ya'll shuld come on out and sit fer a spel.

      Since I'm from a small backwoods town I can make jokes like this... the rest of you are insensitive clods.

  8. Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by rackhamh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Somewhat appropriate for an article about rural America.

    1. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Metzli · · Score: 1

      You're right, nothing to see, unless you're interested in fresh air, starry nights, and that absolute quiet that exists out in the prairie. Crap, now I'm making myself homesick....

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    2. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by vasqzr · · Score: 0, Redundant



      Dey took ar jobs!!

    3. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      unless you're interested in fresh air, starry nights, and that absolute quiet

      Every time I visit Wisconsin, I'm amazed at how clear the sky is at night. In Chicago, I don't even notice the fact that the sky is ALWAYS a hazy, night gray. To see it black and dotted with stars is a breath-taking sight. Let's see now... there's Orion, the Dippers...

    4. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite things about the blackout of '03 was standing on a roof in midtown Manhattan and watching a bunch of life-long New Yorkers go crazy at seeing stars.

      All in all though, I consider myself very much a city boy, and I'm happy that I have landed a NYC. That said, this is somewhat good news, for if I am forced to move to keep my job I'd far rather stay in America. (not bashing the rest of the world, its just those language barriers and being near family/friends things)

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    5. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by rewt66 · · Score: 1
      Right. In particular, you can't see the air.

      How can you live in a place that has transparent air? How do you even breathe?

  9. Oh great by prostoalex · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can stop worrying about my job going to India and start worrying about my job going to Indiana.

    1. Re:Oh great by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The difference? You can follow your job to Indiana. Even better is that rural areas have lower costs of living, thus making $50,000/yr a very good wage to have.

      Honestly, this isn't anything new. In Wisconsin, we had several big companies move (American Family Insurance, Lands End, etc.) because they could run their operations far cheaper while still being within driving distance of Chicago. It's really a win-win situation for everyone.

    2. Re:Oh great by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least it's easier to follow your job there. In my opinion, this is a wonderful alternative.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Oh great by timts · · Score: 1

      I was in iowa, I love that place!!! comparing to iowa, indiana is not suburb...

    4. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the folks who have to move to Wisconsin. It seems to me it's only a win for the corporation.

    5. Re:Oh great by tepples · · Score: 1

      And I can finally stop female-dogging on Slashdot about the lack of jobs in my family's geographic area, because I live in northeast Indiana. Praise the Lord!

    6. Re:Oh great by cmowire · · Score: 1

      And, even better, the employees have the same sort of legal rights and responsibilities as everybody else.

      Which means that abusive office practices aren't as big of a problem for the employees, the employer worries a little less about blatant problems that the police won't touch without a bribe, securities fraud, information leaks, etc.

    7. Re:Oh great by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      It's not really a "win-win" situation for everyone. Sure you can follow your job to hicksville, USA, but why would you want to? There's a reason cost of living is so cheap... it's because there's nothing to do there, and the quality of life is decreased. It's better, of course, than losing your job to someone in India, but a lesser of 2 evils is still an evil.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    8. Re:Oh great by call.me.pete · · Score: 1

      Yes, city-dwellers can sell their over-priced home in a great place like New York, Boston, SF, etc. for enough to buy a palace in Nebraska, Georgia, or Wisconsin. But what you can't get in those rural areas:

      • world-class physicians, hospitals, and other healthcare providers
      • a varied selection of cultural institutions like libraries, universities, movie theatres, museums, ballet, venues for classical and popular music, dance, etc etc
      • endless choices of retail outlets for any kind of shopping, including any kind of specialty shopping (but not Walmart)
      • diverse communities where anyone can find their niche and feel comfortable, even if they are not part of the majority groups that dominate rural areas
      • no need to drive hundreds of miles every week to go about your normal business

      Frankly, I'd rather live in a modest little overpriced house near Boston than a mansion in Kansas. Thank you very much.

    9. Re:Oh great by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Shh... Don't tell them - they'll come and spoil Iowa.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    10. Re:Oh great by AnonymousKev · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And I can finally stop female-dogging ...

      Look, I'm all for reducing the amount of profanity in the course of normal conversation, but if you mean bitch, then say bitch. Otherwise, use another, perfectly valid, word such as complain, gripe, whine, or even speaking in an extremely negative manner. Creating a klunky euphemism is just, well, klunky.

      --
      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997
      (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
    11. Re:Oh great by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      That should probably read, "Except for the folks who have to move to Wisconsin but don't want to leave the city..."

      Personally, I despise cities and refuse to live in one. If I ever get the chance to have a job I like at a good company while living in a rural area, I'll jump at the chance.

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    12. Re:Oh great by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even better is that rural areas have lower costs of living, thus making $50,000/yr a very good wage to have.

      Of course, those same jobs that paid $50,000 in the big city are only going to be offered for $40,000 in the rural areas.

      Sure, you'll be able to afford more housing for the buck, but lifestyle items (cars, DVDs, even most food products) cost about the same all over the country. You could actually end up with less buying power by following a job out to greener pastures.

    13. Re:Oh great by cmowire · · Score: 1

      Not entirely, and not necessarily for that reason.

      Part of the reason for the high cost of living in the big urban cores of the US is not just because there's nothing to do there, but also because there's a lot of demand for everybody in that place.

      If you put a large enough population of college educated folks in a hicksville, USA town, you start to have some of the trappings that they expect. Especially if there's already a universty or other similar construction nearby.

      No, the part that makes it evil is more that if the one business who really invested in a small town leaves the town for some reason, you have no choice but to move. Which doesn't apply to a big-city based company quite as much.

    14. Re:Oh great by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Bah. Small towns aren't all so bad -- I'd still be in Chico, CA (where I went to school) if the market for tech jobs there hadn't been so abysmal. (My best job prospect there was writing financial software in C++ for the rest of my life, or continuing to do contract work at fairly low rates for local non-tech companies -- no, thanks).

      Compared to the traffic and unfriendliness [mostly -- I'm in Austin now, and folks are friendly 'nuff here] of the larger cities, I think there's a quite strong argument to be made for living in rural areas -- especially if the "no jobs there!" objection goes away.

    15. Re:Oh great by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      You do realize that Madison, Wisconsin was selected the "Best Place to Live" by Money Magazine? It generally shows up at the top of such charts (e.g.: Best Places to Live) Part of the reason these are the best places to live is that we have access to much of the same stuff as the city, but at lower cost. Yes, we've got StarBucks, Borders, Barnes & Noble, Malls, great ethnic foods, Marshall Fields, nice diner restaurants, technology stores coming out of the wazoo, etc., etc., etc.

    16. Re:Oh great by syrion · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm a little confused about where, exactly, you are thinking about. I'm a North Carolinian (from the rural back-country), and, well, none of it really applies.
      • Though you're not likely to find a small town with "world-class" healthcare providers, I live in a town of 200 within 50 miles of two pretty decent large hospitals, and within the helicopter radius of more. (Remember, since there is a lower population density, a hospital can serve a larger area.) In addition, private practice doctors really aren't that much different in small towns.
      • Local libraries and other cultural things do tend to suck. However, you can use interlibrary loan and the like to get items you want, and, in my case, Charlotte and Asheville both offer decent cultural experiences.
      • Shopping can be surprisingly varied. People come from all over the world to the furniture outlets in Morganton, North Carolina, for instance. Broyhill and the like. There are also good stationers' shops that I know of, some decent bookstores (though Barnes & Noble have killed most of them), and so forth. In addition, as always, there are cities of respectable size within an hour's travel.
      • In the South, at least, the minority population is significant. North Carolina is about 23% African-American, I believe. Don't judge the region by stereotypes, either; the communities are more integrated and comfortable than you might think.
      • No need to get stuck in traffic jams trying to get places, either. It takes 20 minutes to drive 20 miles, not an hour. You can get from my hometown to Charlotte in 45-60 minutes.
      The quality of life can be quite high in the country; don't underestimate it.
    17. Re:Oh great by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      You're not listening. EVERYTHING is cheaper. I actually know of rural people who have a LOT more tech stuff than their city counterparts. Plus they have lots of land, large houses, easy driving access to restaurants, 2+ cars (usually a car + truck, or minivan + car), etc.

      Wisconsinites have a pretty good life, let me tell you.

    18. Re:Oh great by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Food? No way. I went to Jacksonville, NC this summer and was amazed that I couldn't find a loaf of bread under $1. I'm from PA, and even the premium brands are only about $0.89. Couldn't find it in NC.

    19. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yeah...Indiana is soooo out there in the sticks, dude. Do you know that Indianapolis is the second-largest city in the nation area-wise? Get your head out of your ass, cock-sucking tea-bagger.

    20. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Doctor Jones you don't really have a job beside reading slash dot :)

    21. Re:Oh great by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I think you pretty well summed it up. I'd only like to add one point about Health Care. Your average doctor in many rural areas is actually quite a bit better than your average city ***k-up doctor. They take the time to listen, and actually care about properly treating you. City doctors tend to be far too busy to do the same (with the exception of some private practices.)

      As "world-class doctors", most of those are located at Universities anyway. You know, like the University of Wisconsin or the Mayo Clinic of Minnesota.

      People so often fool themselves into thinking that life in the country has got to suck. It only sucks if you really like living in an apartment, walking to your destination, and having things open 24x7.

    22. Re:Oh great by lyle_hanson · · Score: 1

      I'm won't disagree that New York, Boston, SF, etc. are great places, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that the only places that you can find the benefits you bullet-pointed are a handful of cities on either coast. It's not as if the whole rest of the country falls under the "rural" umbrella. I'm most familiar with the midwest, and you might be surprised to hear that we have "real" cities here too, with the benefit of lower cost of living in a lot of places, and also close proximity to a lot of natural beauty.

      --
      :q!
    23. Re:Oh great by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

      Even better is that rural areas have lower costs of living, thus making $50,000/yr a very good wage to have.

      Yes, but the company isn't going to move you to Indianna, and keep paying you 50k. They're going to move you to Indianna and pay you 40k, or 35k. The whole point it offshoring is being able to pay people less because of lower living standards.

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    24. Re:Oh great by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      It's not only the lack of things to do that sucks, but there's also the lack of other jobs issue. One of my previous employers moved the majority of IT work to Indianapolis because Gartner told them that there would be almost no competition for IT jobs there, so they would be able to cut existing salaries, cut raises, and hire new workers at rock-bottom salaries. Of course, the plan backfired when 90% of the IT staff quit shortly after the plan was announced, but the execs went through with it all and have been paying for the decision ever since...

    25. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The above was true for me, I came back to a town of less than 30k people, it's the largest town around here for about 40 miles, enough that I'd call it a rural area. The town hosts a large state university, so there are a lot of well educated people around, and lots of things to do because of it. I have a 5 minute commute to work, bought a couple of acres and a house at a really great price, and work at a small company where everyone has a master's degree or better. There are lots of small tech companies here because of the university, and it's a very friendly community. It's been an ideal situation for me.

    26. Re:Oh great by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand. $50,000 in rural areas is a lot like $85,000+ in cities. If you're making $50,000 in the city, then you may find a better life in the rural areas anyway.

    27. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I currently live (West Oakland - i.e. ghetto in the SF Bay Area) you're gonna pay about $2.50-$3 for a regular loaf of bread at the cheapo mega market. Occasionally you'll find the super-cheap bread on sale getting close to a dollar - but that's some scary freaking bread.

    28. Re:Oh great by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      I appreciate your attempt to defend Wisconsin - I like it, which is why I'm still here - and I even appreciate your efforts to talk up Madison - my g.f. lives there, so I'm hoping to relocate there soon. Nonetheless, no one with any knowledge of the city would consider Madison "rural."

      Sure, plenty of people from around the country (most of whom don't even know where Wisconsin is, aside from somewhere in the part you fly over to get to the "real" states) think Madison is rural, but it's got a couple hundred thousand people and a notably high average income. It also happens to have the highest number of restaurants per capita of any city in the nation.

      More importantly, it's staunchly liberal (if you're from WI, you must have heard the term People's Republic of Madison, right?), which isn't exactly a hallmark of rural America. It even comes complete with USSResque propaganda on billboards (picture a KMFDM-video-style black and white drawing of an African American man looking bravely up and to the left in front of a red background featuring a star-in-circle of slightly darker red...with the caption WORK! in big, block letters...)

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    29. Re:Oh great by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      That is a problem, and has been a problem for people I know who have moved to Louisville, KY. Even though Louisville does have quite a bit to do (Theatre, Arts, Churchill Downs, the Riverbats, etc.), it still isn't the same to someone who is used to a city the size of New York or L.A.

      On the other hand, if you are into outdoor activities and don't care if about not having access to Broadway, a place like Louisville has a lot better cost of living.

      There are also places like Southern Illinois, where any sort of business would be welcome. Right now the biggest employers are Southern Illinois University (if you are lucky enough to be in Carbondale, the Federal Prison in Marion (Pete Rose got to stay there for awhile), State Prisons, and the Casino boat in Metropolis. A call center could create a lot jobs, plus for those forced to relocate, St. Louis is only a couple hours away, and Chicago is 5 or 6 hours up I-57.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    30. Re:Oh great by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I, in fact, do like having things open 24x7.
      The catch to that is that my org in the corp I work for is global. We have sites in the US, Canada, China (TW), and the Phillipines. Since my life is 24x7, I want my workd to be 24x7. If I relocate and my live becomes 5 9's then I suppose I'd be fine with smallville. (Still need broadband though).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    31. Re:Oh great by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      More importantly, it's staunchly liberal (if you're from WI, you must have heard the term People's Republic of Madison, right?), which isn't exactly a hallmark of rural America.

      Yes, I'm well aware of that fact. It's quite annoying that most of the state is conservative, but Dane county decides elections.

      OTOH, people can do what I did: Live in an outlying area, and travel to Madison as needed. My actual home is near the Wisconsin Dells area, which isn't too bad of a drive to Madison. Although, since we got a StarBucks, a Big Mikes (best subs ANYWHERE! Only in Wisconsin!), and a SuperWalmart (two, actually) in my area, I haven't seen as much need to go to Madison. :-)

    32. Re:Oh great by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Odd as it may sound, it's often easier getting DSL and Cable in rural areas. I have quite a good DSL plan in my Wisconsin home. And my town is only about 10,000 strong!

    33. Re:Oh great by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      Well, Dane and Milwaukee...Milwaukee county is nowhere near as extreme as Dane, but it still votes reliably Democrat every election.

      You're right on about the subs, though...Big Mike's puts every other sub chain to shame. Not even close.

      (Now, if only I could manage to get a job in the Madison area, I could do my own "outskirts of the city" thing...)

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    34. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget our progressive tax system. Earning twice as much money might cost you 4x extra in tax.

    35. Re:Oh great by Mark+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Western Wisconsin is pretty close to the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). Of course, southern Minnesota is even closer, and last I looked, IBM had operations in Rochester, MN. Hence, there is at least one local exceptions to your "rural != good health care" point, with at least one major tech company already there.

      You have a definite point about diversity, though. In much of southern Minnesota, "diversity" mostly means "Swedes and Norwegians living together in harmony". As for the rest, it varies from place to place.

      I'm not entirely sure why the tech economy is so centered on SF & Boston, though, given the high cost of living there. Even moving to smaller cities elsewhere in the country could reduce costs.

    36. Re:Oh great by kaiser423 · · Score: 1

      You consider Jacksonvilles, NC out in the boonies? You city folk amaze me. Boonies is in the dakotas, wyoming, montana, new mexico (where I live). Where you can drive 90 for five hours and not see a single light.

    37. Re:Oh great by Mark+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Boston rolls up its sidewalks fairly early, unless by "things" you mean "bars". When I first moved here, I lived in Davis Square, and the Store 24 was required by local ordinance to close at midnight and not reopen until morning (apparently the law existed in order to prevent late-night armed robbery), leading me to refer to it as "Store 16", as that was how many hours each day it was actually open. It would also be nice if the T ran later.

      I get the impression that if you *really* need a city to be mostly functional 24x7 (esp. a decent transit system), that pretty much limits you to NYC.

    38. Re:Oh great by Old+Telco+Guy · · Score: 1
      And don't forget the best part... when they let your ass go for not working 80 hours a week for 20 hours pay, you'll be stranded in bumblefu&% nowhere, where the only company that employs anyone at more than fruitpicker wages is the one that just fired you!

      Aye, English. Will ye break fast with us? We have no economy, but by golly damn we have "values"!

    39. Re:Oh great by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      Whatcha worried 'bout? Pickups are cheaper 'n' Porsches.

      Like you're gonna be able to drive that little upside-down bathtub on the highways of Oklahoma... Sheeya right.

    40. Re:Oh great by archen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, you'll be able to afford more housing for the buck, but lifestyle items (cars, DVDs, even most food products

      That really depends on what you buy. While it is true that a car will be relativly more expensive with a lower cost of living, you must also factor in that insurance rates are consideably higher, and fuel is probably more expensive than rual areas. Also parking costs are either non existant or trivial. For the rest of the stuff, they purchasing power just does not offset how much you save in cost of living - unless you have very expensive taists or buy a LOT of shit.

      Probably the only thing to REALLY watch out for is debt. Moving from the big city with a lot of debt is not going to help much if you cut your pay. Suddenly college loans are the same, but you can't contribute as much money back. Unless of course you are aquiring debt because you happen to live in the city...

    41. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but lifestyle items (cars, DVDs, even most food products) cost about the same all over

      Who cares? You get yourself a truck and a gun rack, you buy tons of canned food, or better yet, can it yourself from stuff out of the garden, then with your free cash, don't waste it on DVDs and crap, stockpile guns and ammo, and upgrade the ole still out back. You'll still have some cash left over.

    42. Re:Oh great by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never been to Georgia. I live 18mi NE of Atlanta. I have:
      World class physicians (Emory, CDC, Piedmont, Scottish Rite's)
      Atlanta Symphony
      Museums (Woodruff Arts Museum to name one)
      Extremely varied communities
      I work in the burbs to and my job is about half-way between me and downtown.

    43. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You can follow your job to Indiana.

      As long as you are a heterosexual white Christian. Otherwise, living in Indiana will suck for you.

    44. Re:Oh great by nairbv · · Score: 1

      I think I can, I might, and I would prefer to, follow my job to India, than to move to rural america.

      I'm not worried about outsourcing either way though.

    45. Re:Oh great by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Try to factor in quality of life... What are those 50k$ of use when you live in a city full of pollution? Better have 40k$, live modestly and have quality of life. If there is one thing I learnt from my mom, it was: "Be happy with what you have." If more people followed that advice, we would have more happy people and a lot less burnt out employees.

    46. Re:Oh great by Beek · · Score: 1

      >There's a reason cost of living is so cheap... it's because there's nothing to do there, and the quality of life is decreased.

      The great thing about living in Hicksville is that there aren't people like you who believe that bullshit. HOLLA!

    47. Re:Oh great by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Please report the truth. The acceptable house brand bread at Safeway is two loaves for $2.50 about every other week. I will note that it hasn't been 2 for 2 dollars for about a year.

    48. Re:Oh great by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 1

      You didn't think Bush wants to project jobs in BLUE STATES, do you? Move to a Red State, reject evolution and get a job!

      --
      Think global, act loco
    49. Re:Oh great by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      No way, jacksonville is HUGE compared to where I live. Trust me, I'm in the woods. What I'm trying to say is that food prices vary widely. They're not almost all the same price countrywide.

    50. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't been to Indy, Beech Grove, Bloomington, anywhere..

    51. Re:Oh great by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      lifestyle items (cars, DVDs, even most food products) cost about the same all over the country

      Local and state sales taxes vary and are often higher in more urban states. For this reason (plus vehicle regestration, auto insurance, etc.), cars may not cost about the same all over the country.
      I have found food costs to vary widely (within the US and in foreign countries). Food in Germany is very reasonable (wrt cost). Food costs in CA are fairly high compared with those in the middle of the country (i.e. the red states - I hate the fact that the state in which I live is a red state; I thought we got rid of those commies a long time age).

    52. Re:Oh great by heck · · Score: 1
      I did.

      Moved to Indiana from Colorado. Colorado's job market still sucks, although friends are telling me the coroner did return the body and the body may be off life support now.

      Ya wanna know something? Don't regret the move. Miss skiing, but I can go visit my grandmother or my in-laws when I want the mountains. The companies here have a much more family friendly attitude; in fact the entire area is much more family oriented. As a guy with two small kids I'm happy as hell. My daughter has said to me several times she likes it here better.

      Yes, there are companies that still believe people should go home at night and on weekends. Companies that believe you should take two hours off for a parent teacher conference (and, yes, you have to make the two hours up later, but they have no problem with the concept of "he's stepping out for a while") Companies that believe in vacation time. Don't get me wrong, same company is looking at outsourcing some things to India, and we're all keeping an eye on that (right now they're saying "key development stays here, no exceptions, we're not stupid enough to outsource that" but we'll wait and see)

      I'm doing Java, WebSphere, blah blah - same stuff I would be doing if I was in Colorado.

      PS. One of the best sushi places I've ever eaten at is here. And I lived in California for 5 years. Yeah, I don't have the selection of ethnic foods I used to have, but I have found one of everything - a good Gyro place, several Indian restaurants, etc. etc. And Denver ethnic foods sucked, quite frankly. There were more in Boulder, and scattered pockets around Denver - but you were looking at a drive of 30 minutes to an hour for some types of food, if you could find a decent restaurant.

    53. Re:Oh great by Etyenne · · Score: 1

      I don't believe the everything-is-cheaper-in-rural-area hype. I am from a very rual area, and commodities (food, lifestyle items, etc) cost the same indeed. Service (like restaurant) tend to cost a little bit more at equal quality (less competition). Utility cost exactly the same, and you probably spend more on long-distance. And it is impossible to live without at *least* one car per household, and more probably two if both parent work. Plus you put a lot more mileage on your vehicule.

      That being said, mortgage is the dealbreaker. I am from the province of Québec, Canada. In the rural area where I come from, you can get a nice house with a *lot* of land for about 45K$ CDN. Same house near a bigger city like Québec City would cost around 120K$ CDN, and around a metropolitan area such as Montreal would cost no less than 180K$ CDN in the suburb.

      When you pay three or four time less for your mortgage, you can afford a little dent in your salary and pay a bit more for certain things, and yet come out winner. You do the math.

      (And in case you come up with the "mortgage is equity !" line, let me remind you the insane interest you are paying is not)

      --
      :wq
    54. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be able to sometime soon, if this gets put on the ballot. Doesn't seem like too bad an idea, pay for better roads (with funds that should be coming from the federal govt., but are not because OK pays more in gas taxes than it receives in hwy funds) with an additional gas tax. Reduce the number of accidents, be nicer on cars, and make walking a more attractive alternative for all the lardos in the state.

    55. Re:Oh great by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      I just checked here and found that my salary would be equivalent to $167,364 in San Jose, CA. I would need to double my salary to live in San Jose as I live now.

    56. Re:Oh great by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      What are those 50k$ of use when you live in a city full of pollution?

      You might focus on the pollution in cities; I focus on the culture.

      I'd rather live in a place where I can go to a different museum, bar, film, restaurant, concert, or park every single day of the year and still not run out of options than to live in a place where "a night on the town" consists of picking up a case of beer at the Wal-Mart, heading down to the quarry to drink all night, and then heading to Denny's for breakfast. (Not that all rural places are like that.)

    57. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Aldi--sixty-nine cents per loaf of wheat or rye bread--white loaves are 3 for a dollar. Whole-grain is $1.69...

  10. Wahoo! by DaHat · · Score: 5, Funny

    South Dakota gladly welcomes it's new in-sourcing overlords!

    One hopes this expands my job prospects here... not that it matters too much, I love my job.

    1. Re:Wahoo! by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Citibank, EROS, Daktronics, Polaris, what more do you want?

    2. Re:Wahoo! by macklin01 · · Score: 1

      And you're in luck if you go a bit south. Wahoo is the capital of Saunders County, Nebraska (and about 20 miles from where I grew up.) :) -- Paul

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    3. Re:Wahoo! by DaHat · · Score: 1

      One must also not forget Sencore and Lodgenet.

      But to answer your question... more, we want more!

    4. Re:Wahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it improves job prospects, I'll move back.

    5. Re:Wahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One hopes this expands my job prospects here... not that it matters too much, I love my job.

      Your boss reads slashdot too, doesn't he?

  11. Rural America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    For those of you unfamiliar with America's urban population densities, here's a map of the areas they are discussing. The rural areas are marked in Green and labeled "Jesusland".

  12. Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    it will be good news for American techies-at least the ones in rural communities and those willing to move there

    But will they be able to survive without pizza deliveries?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Metzli · · Score: 1

      Actually, the delivery guys will drive out farther than you think. Ten miles isn't that unusual and, unlike the city, it only take about 10 minutes to traverse that distance.

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    2. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      "If you build it, they will come."

      That wasn't baseball players - that was the pizza delivery guys they were talking about.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    3. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by CommanderData · · Score: 4, Funny

      But will they be able to survive without pizza deliveries?

      No, they will not. But of course that means there will be even more rural jobs, as thousands of pizza delivery people migrate from NYC to service the IT boomtowns of the south :)

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    4. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by mbrinkm · · Score: 1

      What makes you think pizza doesn't get delivered in rural America?

      I live in a town of ~400 people - no less than 5 different pizza places deliver to me.

      --
      "Don't worry about people stealing an idea. If it's original, you will have to ram it down their throats." --Howard Aike
    5. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by pilgrim23 · · Score: 5, Funny

      120 miles to Starbucks, 210 miles to Frys. Your neighbor in the cubicle next door keeps grousing about Sorgum Prices (whatever that is) and their dating prospects at the next Grange dance. The big local news is the John Deere dealership is expanding, and Billy Joe Bob's sister (yeah the one with THOSE teeth) is makin moon eyes at you when she visits at lunch. Makes me want to point my pickup truck towards Cupertino and GET OUT OF THERE!

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    6. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I was thinking about places like Condon or Fossil Oregon- where the nearest pizza delivery joint is 50 miles away in The Dalles- and yet they're theoretically a good candidate for exactly this type of revolution because they've got wind farms to provide electricity REAL local, and Oregon Department of Transportation has teamed up with Verizon to get fiber to every cattle ranch....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Get over it. Rural is not all that rural anymore. Most places will have pizza delivery, Chinese food, and Walmart. A large number of farmers are on line, have satellite TV and have been using GPS for years. What tends to be lacking is in some areas broadband and no you will not have 85 pizza places to choose from. I for one would love to move to a small rural town with clean air, not crowds, and home prices that are only in the 5 figure range.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by tazan · · Score: 1

      Yep, we have pizza delivery. We have Taco Bell, MacDonalds, and Sonic and a Walmart super center. We even have broadband. The main differnece is the payments on my 5 bedroom house are less than my former coworkers pay in property tax on theirs.

    9. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > 120 miles to Starbucks, 210 miles to Frys.

      80ms to Lou Malnati's Chicago Style Pizza. 70ms to Newegg.

      Some things are made of bits. For everything else, there's UPS and FedEx.

    10. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      in rural southern accent: IT bumtown

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    11. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by idiotnot · · Score: 1

      Yep. I live outside a town of 16k, and there's three local pizza joints (all very good), and a Dominos. I think only Dominos delivers, but the quality of the pizza at one of the other places makes it my first choice a lot of the time, even if I have to hop in the car for ten minutes.

      The town also has a McDonalds, and a Subway.

      This is true in lots of places. But people don't get out enough to realize it.

      What you *do* miss, however, are the sit-down chain places. No TGIFriday's. No Ruby Tuesday. No Bennigan's, etc. etc.

    12. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      If you had RTFA'd- you'd know that they were talking SIGNIFICANTLY more rural than that- by a couple of orders of magnitude (the CEO of this corp is from a town of 640....I guess they probably don't count pigs....)

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    13. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      Hell, I live in the heart of a middle-to-major metropolitan area (Milwaukee, WI), and I can't get a damn pizza delivered.

      (For anyone who knows the city, by "heart" I mean a couple blocks awaye from Chase and Oklahoma)

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    14. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by UWC · · Score: 1

      I for one would love to move to a small rural town with clean air, not crowds, and home prices that are only in the 5 figure range.

      These days it's going to be hard to find a good-sized house anywhere for 5 figures, unless it can be hauled in on a couple of flatbeds (some of those somehow have over 2000 square feet). Low-to-mid 100s would probably work in some areas and probably many rural ones. House price inflation has been insane in the last few years. The upside of that is that you'll most likely make a decent profit if you decide to sell your house a few years down the road.

    15. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you look hard enough I'll bet you could find a house in the 4 digit range. Well assuming you can afford the $35/month house payment.
      • Two story
      • 3 bedroom(s)
      • 1 bath
      • Approximately 1134 sq. ft.
      • Electric heating
      • 1 car garage
      • Approximately 1 acre(s)
      • Public sewer service
      • Public water supply
      • $7,500
    16. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "Most places will have pizza delivery, Chinese food, and Walmart."

      I've made the mistake of sampling what passes for pizza and Chinese food in some of the banjo-swinging states. And don't even get me started about Wal-Mart.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    17. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's pretty neat actually. As long as the roof is intact (or maybe 50% of it is) and the water runs, then you could buy your own house! I'm sure the inside is a disgusting disaster, but if you plunk another $1000 or so, you could probably fix up the bathroom and a bedroom so they are comfortable.

      If not, the stuff in the $50k to $60k range probably aren't bad. :)

    18. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by jrumney · · Score: 1
      120 miles to Starbucks

      If such a place exists, I want to move there now!

    19. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1
      I've often wondered how many of the people on this thread will make comments like this, and others about how rural places are so horrible, have never been to those places, or lived there for any amount of time.

      I've lived in large cities, small towns, and everything in between. I'd take those rural places over the smog, congestion, and ultra high cost of living any day of the week. The world does not revolve around those places. Sorry.


      PS: I'm not so much replying directory to the parent, as I am all the posts of this type that will no doubt follow.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    20. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is that the rural area I grew up in never had anything as nice as pizza deliveries or broadband or cable TV- and never will either thanks to some over zealous Mennonites. But the original comment was due to a large ammount of disdain for what I've seen of city life since; many of these people who were born and raised in the cities couldn't find water in a thunderstorm if it wasn't treated with chemicals, pressurized for them, and comming out of a tap....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    21. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by katharsis83 · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a resident of the CA Bay Area, I'd love to move to a place with home prices that are only in the 6 figure range.

    22. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by mordors9 · · Score: 1

      As one of the looked down upon members of rural America, can I ask: if my local chinese restaurant is owned and entirely staffed by chinese people that barely speak english, how is our chinese restaurant less than yours. And the locally owned pizzerias are owned by real italian people. One of them is owned by a gentleman from Naples, another from Palermo. I have bad news for you, the immigrants of this country spread all through our country. They all did not stop at the water's edge.

    23. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most places will have pizza delivery, Chinese food, and Walmart.

      Unfortunately that's also all they will have, and the pizza and the Chinese food will both really suck. Especially the Chinese food. Walmart is Walmart, so, though it also sucks, it's not any worse than Walmarts in more populated areas.

      Home prices are a red herring. You can always cash out your equity on your $600k coastal home, and you walk with all of that fat paycheck you earn in the city.

    24. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      All very true. I'm originally from Wichita, Kansas... so I'm from a somewhat urban area. But everywhere I've lived, even the most rural area had at least one pizza delivery place and the like. However, I've never lived in Mennonite country, so I can't speak to that. ;)

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    25. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      looks like Yet another clueless coaster. Everything has to be better in the city. Of course they also feel that making comments like Banjo swinging states also seems to be okay. While I do not live in a rural area I am also not a city dweller. My point is that rural America is not Hooterville anymore. The people there have CNN and most of the same access to information as the people in the "big city" and tend to be a lot more polite from the evidence I have seen here.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    26. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      No broadband, no NardofDoom. It's bad enough living the backwater I live in now, with no free, legal WiFi within 5 miles.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    27. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      Most places will have pizza delivery, Chinese food, and Walmart./i?

      Yeah, but will the chinese food be so hot it makes your eyeballs bleed? Only place I've been able to find that is LA (and maybe Sichuan, but that's a long way to move).

    28. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I moved from Chicago burbs way into the Michigan weeds; we have the BEST chinese food here I have ever had, anywhere except maybe San Francisco....
      Walmart is coming; a new super-superstore, but it is not needed; the local "big" stores are pretty good, cable modem and wireless everywhere (the farmer up the road did it!), and the wealthy farmers have all the newest gadgets...

    29. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      ...people migrate from NYC to service the IT boomtowns of the south :)
      Hey! Atlanta has enough sprawl as it is; we don't need any more!
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    30. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you're there when you see on the local news that "Bubba lost everything during the tornado." Which comprised his trailer and half a dozen cars that wouldn't run anyway. This area is only 30 miles from the nearest Starbucks and about 15 from a Cafe that has live music.

      It's not as bad as you think.

      In fact, where else can you race a modded lawnmower at 40 mph around a dirt track, fish, hunt, and enjoy the fresh air? - Oh wait, this is ./

    31. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Most places will have pizza delivery, Chinese food, and Walmart. Well, pizza makes you fat (though I know it is the staple diet of enough /.'ers). The "Chinese food" is not really Chinese food. They are simply selling what a bunch of Americans with no taste will buy, and they always make it more fatty and oily than it should be. As for Walmart, who cares??? Don't you have any real stores? I've lived in both rural and urban areas. I find it scary living in places like Centre County, PA and seeing the arrival of a new Red Lobster make the front page news (true story).

    32. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "As one of the looked down upon members of rural America, can I ask: if my local chinese restaurant is owned and entirely staffed by chinese people that barely speak english, how is our chinese restaurant less than yours. And the locally owned pizzerias are owned by real italian people."

      Easy: lack of competition. When you're the only Chinese restaurant in town, you don't have to be as good as the Chinese place that's in proximity to ten other Chinese places fighting for the same business. If you're located in a town where it's tough to get a reservation at the Applebee's on a Friday night, "good enough" is just fine for the locals who don't know any better.

      Make no mistake; on the road I've discovered some real gems in the international food arena run by immigrants such as those you describe. However, my extensive and frequent travels to the small-town midwest have shown me that mediocrity is the culinary standard.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
  13. The other kinds of Indians by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why contract with South Asians when you can contract with businesses run by good old American Indians? I'm sure somebody on the reservation could help you admin your Apache server.

    1. Re:The other kinds of Indians by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to bet they can get better pay and job security running casinos...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:The other kinds of Indians by big-giant-head · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the self proclaimed slashdot rep from oklahoma, I would like to announce that Oklahoma gladly welcomes our Rural Insourcing Overlords.

      Dell just located a 700 person call center here and plans to double it's size...... Come on over...

      --

      So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
    3. Re:The other kinds of Indians by dupper · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? The spirit of sacred Bear has been corrupted. They'd never work in tech.

    4. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      tepples: I'll trade you 30 beads and a pouch of tobacco for the services of your most experienced PHP warrior.

      Chief: hmmm ... let us celebrate our alliance with smoking of peace pipe.

    5. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Homology · · Score: 1
      Why contract with South Asians when you can contract with businesses run by good old American Indians? I'm sure somebody on the reservation could help you admin your Apache server.

      Of course, after committing genocide and stealing their land I'm sure that low paid jobs are a fair compensation.

    6. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to the really swell job we're doing now, right? It wasn't until this past September that the federal government realized that "No Child Left Behind" included kids on the reservation, and bothered to send someone out to take a look at the schools.

    7. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always love how people get so emotional over the American Indians. As if they were the one and only conquered people. I don't see anybody yelling at the Italians because the Romans at one point conquered their ancestors. Veni, Vidi, Vici, Tace!

    8. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why should we care about their kids? If they want to be their own government then let them worry about their kids. If they want their kids to get a good education then move out of the reservation. It is nice of us to let them continue living on their ancestral lands. Take a look at history and let me know when another conquered people got treated so well?

    9. Re:The other kinds of Indians by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Well, nobody will be yelling at the Americans either, once they've been conquered and subjugated.

    10. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, a lot of fledgling Indian telcos being run by tribal members and tribal governments do exist. They benefit from not having to pay state taxes on their land, and I think they avoid paying other state taxes. There are also many government grant benefits offered to startup American Indian businesses.

    11. Re:The other kinds of Indians by woodsrunner · · Score: 1, Informative

      Rape, murder, and pillaging occurred in every war and military action of the time - not that it was a very nice thing to do, but back then "might makes right" was a valid statement. Isn't that what we're doing today, only instead of smallpox blankets we got bombs and bullets laced with Plutonium?

    12. Re:The other kinds of Indians by DaddyDonMynack · · Score: 1

      Gee, and you wonder why nobody comes to visit you....

    13. Re:The other kinds of Indians by PenchantToLurk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh dear. Out-house-sourcing.

    14. Re:The other kinds of Indians by cmowire · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the bigger point is that you are more than welcome to sue the ghosts of Infantry's pasts for delivering government-supported beatdowns and the ghosts of many now-dead politicians for their bad decisions. But your ability to compensate for past offenses decreases over time because everybody who was actually hurt as well as anybody related to decisions made is dead. Somebody probably got away with murdering one of my ancestors back in history. If I walk past their descendent now, am I entitled to any sort of compensation? Will I even be able to know that they killed my ancestor long ago?

    15. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...100s of square miles of free tribal land is enough...

      Good one.

    16. Re:The other kinds of Indians by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Well, the bombs are primarly for destroying their military framework: weapons caches, factories, tanks, etc. It's their fault that they purposely hide weapons inside of hospitals, schools, mosques, etc. I don't think anyone today would argue that we drop bombs solely for the sake of killing people. We drop bombs because we are trying to neutralize the military threat in the area ... whether that be a tank or some guy carrying an AK 47.

      As for the bullets laced with plutonium: please explain. I've never heard of this. Although, I find it hard to believe that a bullet laced with plutonium is any worse than a bullet that has just pierced your lung or heart. So why go to the effort of lacing them with plutonium?

    17. Re:The other kinds of Indians by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      I never thought this post was flamebait either, mods can you please be more digigent with those points please. Just mod fairly please, this poster does have a point.

    18. Re:The other kinds of Indians by ksheff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They don't even have to do that. A tribe north of where I used to live was paying it's members $1000 per adult and $250 per kid every month. Just for living inside the county. For the area that was a nice wage and if they were ambitious, they could get a job at the casino. Most didn't, so it was staffed mainly by caucasians.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    19. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Homology · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So, why should the Indians be treated any different? Just because they were so weak militarily and behind the times in military technology doesn't mean they deserve protection from the rest of the world. They simply get what the rest of the world, or whoever conquers them, decides that they should get.

      And US citizens wonder why so many want to kill you, at whatever cost to themselves...

    20. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can try to conquer the physical country of America but you would never really get rid of Americanism. It has spread throughout the globe and there is no way of pulling it back.

    21. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hate to tell you but it wasn't the current Americans that did these things. Most of the population's ancestors didn't even live in this country at the time.

      And I can tell you that Muslim extremists don't care about the plight of the Native American. They hate us because we stick our nose into what they think should be their own business.

    22. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't lacking for money. A couple friends of mine from college grew up on a couple of the poorest Indian reservations in the US. There were maybe 100 kids in the entire high school (8-12), but they had an indoor Olympic sized swimming pool courtesy of the Feds. If some of other parts of the schools look ragged, it's not due to lack of funding. It's because they beat the shit out everything.

    23. Re:The other kinds of Indians by tarmithius · · Score: 1

      It is depleted uranium not plutonium. They are mainly used to peirce armor.
      Read this for more

    24. Re:The other kinds of Indians by bleckywelcky · · Score: 0, Troll

      How is it not free? We conquered them, so it's ours now. Just because they used it before doesn't entitle them to the land. Whoever can protect the land and claim rights to it at the same time owns the land. We conquered the land and took control of it and then willfully on our own accord decided to give them portions of our land for their own personal use without asking for anything in return. That is free.

    25. Re:The other kinds of Indians by buysse · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually, it's depleted uranium. Not as toxic as plutonium, but still not exactly pixie dust.

      It's used by the military for an unusual property -- when DU munitions strike armor or metal, they basically vaporize themselves in a heat flash, allowing DU shells to cut through tank armor.

      Unfortunately for anyone nearby, or living in the nation being attacked, when the DU vaporizes, it leaves an extremely fine radioactive dust in the air, which then settles and pollutes the area, as well as being inhaled by anyone nearby.

      Radiation levels in many parts of Iraq are way above normal background, and since the first Gulf War, the incidence of birth defects has risen dramatically. You can google for references yourself.

      --
      -30-
    26. Re:The other kinds of Indians by bleckywelcky · · Score: 3, Insightful


      I don't wonder why, I know why: they want what we have.

    27. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Wateshay · · Score: 1

      I've long held that every former slave owner should take half of their net worth and split it up among all of their former slaves.

      Seems like a similar tack would make sense for the Indians. Andrew Jackson should personally apologize to every single Indian run off of their land.

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    28. Re:The other kinds of Indians by uberdave · · Score: 1

      I'm sure many a Greek, Babylonian, and Roman thought the same way.

    29. Re:The other kinds of Indians by General+Alcazar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cool! I'll be by soon to shoot you and take your land. You might mind, but I don't care! Fuck you, you fucking fuck! It'll be mine soon, 'cuz whoever has the most guns wins! I'll also kill your whole family, just for kicks. Yeehaw!

    30. Re:The other kinds of Indians by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      I notice that people who make these type of statements tend to be in dominant positions of power.

      I'm willing to bet U.S. citizens will be singing a different tune in 300 years when the United States has lost its position as a superpower, and they're getting pushed around by a stronger country (China, maybe?).

    31. Re:The other kinds of Indians by ahodgson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell yeah. I want the land those damned Saxons stole from my Briton ancestors. Although, I'm torn, because I also want the land my Viking ancestors stole from everyone else and then lost again. It's so confusing.

    32. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except its not radioactive. The dust is bad because its a heavy metal, which has nothing to do with radiation.

    33. Re:The other kinds of Indians by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Um, how is this modded insightful while I was modded a troll?

      Either way, if you were a sovereign nation, go right ahead. But you aren't, and we have rules inside of our own sovereign nation to govern how people interact. I'm sorry if you if you can't see the difference, but it is a very simple concept. A nation != a person.

    34. Re:The other kinds of Indians by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      I don't think anyone today would argue that we drop bombs solely for the sake of killing people

      If we did - you'd know it and there wouldn't be any argument whether or not we were trying to do so.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    35. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Koatdus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'd be willing to bet they can get better pay and job security running casinos.


      I live in the State of Washington where indian casinos are all over the place. I have to say that the casinos don't help the average indian very much.

      The tribal elders get a nice kick back from the big gaming companys ( Trump, etc.) but that doesn't pull the average indian up any. They may get a yearly profit sharing check but that just means that they can have a plasma screen and DirectTV in the single-wide. Few of the actual members of the tribe get good jobs out of the deal. You will see a few dealers that are indians and the pit boss may be an indian but those are not jobs with a future. Not jobs that are going to create a strong middle class in the tribe. Not jobs that are going get their kids interested in collage.

      I rarely gamble in them as I find them depressing.

      I think that the tribes would do much better for their people if they could get some kind of high tech industry to set up on their land. Some of them own very valuable land like big lots in the middle of Tacoma. (small city to the south)

      If the tribal elders could convice Dell or Google or Gateway or Intel or someone like that to lease a building and hire/train/educate the members of the tribe in exchage for a sweetheart deal they would be doing a lot more good for their people then just setting up another casino.

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
    36. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Is there a reason that American Indians can't just enter the mainstream work force?

      If there aren't jobs on the Rez, why not move away? You know, like everybody else who doesn't find opportunity knocking on their door?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    37. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You come on by. You'd be wise not to let me see you coming, though.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    38. Re:The other kinds of Indians by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      on that note i helped my dad move his gun cabinets today....he has 14 semi-automatic rifles, 6 shotguns, 2 assault rifles, 4 pistols and about 4000 rounds of ammo...

      so you'll be here when? ;)

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    39. Re:The other kinds of Indians by cjsnell · · Score: 1

      Radiation levels in many parts of Iraq are way above normal background, and since the first Gulf War, the incidence of birth defects has risen dramatically. You can google for references yourself.

      I'm sure that none of these birth defects were caused by the Iraq's mass-torching of Kuwaiti oil wells, right?

    40. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to rape his wife and daughters... Oh, and burn hid house... All that while he is watching and before you blow his brains against the wall. Make sure daughters and wife live. Killing them is having mercy. If you conquer land, do it right ;-)

    41. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Simonetta · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Before America, many of the native tribes of North America lived in fear of constant raids from the other tribes. Now the native Americans have a blue passport that assures them safe passage nearly anywhere in the world. Before America, the natives spoke a language of the tribe and maybe the language of next tribe over the hills. Maybe a few hundred people spoke this language, maybe a few thousand. Now most native Americans speak and understand English, which is understood by a billion people throughout the world. Many natives also speak a ancient tribal language also.

      Before America, when a native child got sick, the father will pray and chant with the medicine man to the Great Spirit. More often than not, the child would die. Now when a native child gets sick, the father and the medicine man chant to the Great Spirit. Or they do until the mother gets pissed off and makes him take the child to the reservation hospital. Usually the child recovers fully.

      Yes, the land was taken. Yes there were massacres. Yes there was cultural desolation. Yes there were new diseases and ruthless intoxicants introduced that there was no defence against.

      But the worst is over. The massacres and cultural destruction will not happen again. Native American tribal values and traditions can rise again and become a valued and trusted part of all North American society. Native Nations populations will grow up to and beyond the levels before the Europeans arrived.

      All this can happen, should the people of the tribal nations wish for it to happen and work to make it happen.

    42. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THey don't move away because there is a lot of money to be made from being "disadvantaged".

      Ditto Australian/Kiwi abo's and mauri's... they could go to college, get educated and get good jobs... but it's easier to just drink booze and complain about how "white settlers" have taken all "their" land and "their" spiritual rights.

      Of course, they don't actually want "their" land and "their" rights back, they want cash, and lots of it, and lots of it every year...

    43. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Homology · · Score: 1
      I don't wonder why, I know why: they want what we have.

      You are downright scary in your ignorance. They want to be left alone, including when they democratically elect a democratic government.

      Please don't put USA as a good example of how to conduct fair elections: When stuff like election fraud hits Slashdot frontpage it's pretty serious....

    44. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's used by the military for an unusual property -- when DU munitions strike armor or metal, they basically vaporize themselves in a heat flash, allowing DU shells to cut through tank armor.

      Absolute bollocks. They use DU simply because it's the most dense material available on a cost effective basis.

    45. Re:The other kinds of Indians by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      .he has 14 semi-automatic rifles, 6 shotguns, 2 assault rifles, 4 pistols and about 4000 rounds of ammo...

      This kind of attitude always makes me laugh. Short of having an agency like the Secret Service protecting you around the clock, all that firepower would be pretty much meaningless if anyone reasonably intelligent wanted you dead & had no scruples about how to accomplish it. You'd never even get a chance to find out who killed you.

    46. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Dog's_Breakfast · · Score: 1

      Actually, DU (which us U238) is slightly radioactive. But only a little. You are right in that the harm to human health is mainly caused by the fact that it is a toxic heavy metal. Breathing uranium dust is definitely not good for you.

    47. Re:The other kinds of Indians by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1


      Um, ok, so you missed the point, let me draw it out for you:

      1) Riches.
      2) Freedom.

      The elections are just tools for obtaining 1) and 2). If everyone in the USA could be independently wealthy and have every freedom they wanted without voting, do you think they would care about the elections? No. Our voter turnout would drop to less than 5% - only people who cared about politics for the sake of politics would vote. You are downright scary in your ignorance.

    48. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If there aren't jobs on the Rez, why not move away?


      It's easy for you to say that -- you can move to any other town or state, and still remain in your own culture. Imagine if the situation was reversed, and you lived in a little pocket of European American culture, and 99.9% of the rest of the country was Native American. Would you still find moving away to be such an easy option?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    49. Re:The other kinds of Indians by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea. However, the only places where you'll find significant numbers of slaves and slave owners today are a few third world regions. Mostly Islamic influenced parts of the world, incidentally.

    50. Re:The other kinds of Indians by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      when DU munitions strike armor or metal, they basically vaporize themselves in a heat flash, allowing DU shells to cut through tank armor.

      No. It's just a denser metal and as a result the projectile hits harder and does more damage.

      Have I been trolled here?? It's hard to believe such an ignorant idiotic idea could be posted on Slashdot and really be meant.

    51. Re:The other kinds of Indians by spectecjr · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's used by the military for an unusual property -- when DU munitions strike armor or metal, they basically vaporize themselves in a heat flash, allowing DU shells to cut through tank armor.

      Actually, the reason why they went through tank armor was because, by volume, they're the heaviest thing you can throw at the enemy. High mass, small impact zone = massive penetrating power. Thus they can cut through armor not because they're on fire, but because they're bullets which are 15% heavier than lead, and about 63 times harder.

      The uranium burning is useful inside the tank, after the shell has been penetrated, where it burns like potassium and takes out whatever's inside. The burning doesn't help with the penetration as much as the density and hardness.

      But don't just take my word for it. Read this:

      How Stuff Works - Bunker Buster Bombs

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    52. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Wateshay · · Score: 1

      Yeah.

      Of course, I meant my comment more as a joke than anything else. You see, all of the former slave owners in the U.S. are dead now. So are all of the former slaves.

      Andrew Jackson is dead, too.

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    53. Re:The other kinds of Indians by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet in 300 years we'll have gotten past the whole 'Nation' thing and we'll be prosperous and there will be plenty for everyone. It's likely said prosperity will have been spurred by freedom. Reference 'The Federation' as depicted in Star Trek TNG as one possible scenario. (not the Original 'Cold War' Star Trek, tho)

      Why would people be frippering around about race and 'nation' in three hundred years? How quaint.

    54. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Homology · · Score: 1

      US citizens like you scares me (as an otherwise USA friendly European ally). You scare most of the world as well with your blatant ignorance due to US corporate media. Yeah, likes of of you are very scary.

    55. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Wow.
      Just... wow.

      OK, I don't know where you went to school or what they taught you, but do you know what they had before we fucked the middle east over?

      Iraq had a Christian prime minister. Openly Christian. Back then, they didn't kill people for practicing their faith. Women equal rights with men, and could hold jobs, vote, and even run for office.

      And then we had the UN start sanctioning Iraq. We set off political and religious turmoil in the region that would burn for decades just to try and counter Saddam's growing influence (not to mention that WE put the bastard there in the first place). Now fundie Muslims are in power, and everyone around the world is worse for it.

      As for your "do you think they would care" bit of WTFery, take a real hard look at Bush's elite "base" as he calls them. I bet every one of those rich business owners were quite free to go and vote, and most certainly they voted for Bush this year.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    56. Re:The other kinds of Indians by DakotaK · · Score: 1

      That was quite possibly the funniest thing I've heard all month. /me golf claps

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    57. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what, buddy, when settlers moved in and poisoned/drove off the locals, they were people too. Hell, there wasn't even a "nation" here until the declaration of independence.

    58. Re:The other kinds of Indians by really? · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Left "my" country when I was just over 17. Knew nobody in the new world. Learned the lanuage and cultutre, went to Uni., etc. No problem.
      After a while I went to Japan; yet another "alien" culture. Learned the language and some of the culture, worked, etc. No problem.
      I am not special and nowhere near unique; there are millions of people who do this kind of stuff all the time ...

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    59. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      A: Happens every year. Heck, the dead voting in Louisiana is a running joke. We're just getting more uptight about it, which hopefully means that the problems will be fixed.
      B: Happens just about everywhere else too, if you look close enough. Heck, yeah, put it out in public, makes sure that people don't get to trust the system too much, making sure that oversight is maintained.
      C: We want to be left alone too. Have you read what the islamofacists ultimatly want? They want nothing less than a global muslim theocracy.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    60. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      That's what family is for! ;)

      Hatfields and McCoys anybody?

      Besides, they convicted Peterson. Plenty of "reasonably intelligent people" have attempted murder, and either fouled it up and got caught, or did it and got caught.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    61. Re:The other kinds of Indians by corbettw · · Score: 1

      I've long held that every former slave owner should take half of their net worth and split it up among all of their former slaves.

      Sounds like a great idea. Next time you meet a former slave owner, or a former slave for that matter, go ahead and get started on it.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    62. Re:The other kinds of Indians by corbettw · · Score: 1

      They want to be left alone, including when they democratically elect a democratic government.

      Bwa-ha-ha!!! That's got to be the funniest thing I've read today. 'Cause ya know, respecting the democratically elected government of Saudi Arabia was one of Al Qaeda's demands.

      Please don't put USA as a good example of how to conduct fair elections: When stuff like election fraud hits Slashdot frontpage it's pretty serious....

      Oh my God, you're on a roll! You need to get signed up to work on Saturday Night Live, they need your talent! Holding /. of all things as the penultimate standard of journalism. That's just great.

      Thanks for making my day a little brighter with your clever humor.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    63. Re:The other kinds of Indians by winwar · · Score: 1

      Or poor nutrition/health from diverting funds from "oil for food" programs to other military related activities...

    64. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Moofie · · Score: 1

      If I want the advantages living outside my insular culture offers, yeah, I sure would.

      I'd move anywhere in the world I could find good work. I like meeting people with different experiences than mine, and finding out that, you know what? They're pretty much just like me, when you get right down to it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    65. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If a nation wasn't strong enough to protect themselves, then they lost - plain and simple. So, why should the Indians be treated any different?" Just because they were so weak militarily and behind the times in military technology doesn't mean they deserve protection from the rest of the world. They simply get what the rest of the world, or whoever conquers them, decides that they should get."

      So by this logic should we quit prosecuting muggers, rapists and murderers? If their victims were to weak too defend themselves then should the victims just have to grin and bear it, and move on with life without any sort of recorse? Should the attacker not have to atone at all for what they did? Are those the ideals that phrases like 'with liberty and justice for all' conjure up?

      It's true no-one can go back and undo what's already been done. I just think it's interesting
      how people can take such a hard stance when it's the other person whose been screwed over.

    66. Re:The other kinds of Indians by jtev · · Score: 1

      Yep, and we stole all the best parts from them, put it in a great big cultural blenter, and drank the pure essence of being a bad-assed center culture.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    67. Re:The other kinds of Indians by jtev · · Score: 1

      You're right, it's actualy the SPEED of the DU round that causes it to vaporoize. They pack a hell of a lot of propelant behind it, and No, it's not gunpowder.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    68. Re:The other kinds of Indians by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who served in Gulf War I who told me that soldiers would find the 'head' of DU rounds out in the desert, and some brought them back to camp as souvineers. This was before they found out they were depleted uranium. His telling me this made me believe that the 'round' would hit a target and not vaporize. I may be wrong, or it may be that it only vaporizes if it hits it's target.

      The fact that soldiers were carrying these things around and some even tried to bring them home shows how some of the 'Gulf War Syndrome' problems may have started.

    69. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I always love how people get so emotional over the American Indians. As if they were the one and only conquered people."

      I always love how people get so emotional over 9/11. As if the American people were the one and only nation to be attacked by terrorists.

    70. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why are americans angry if they do the work cheaply in india and china?

      If americans are up to it they can do it dirt cheap and no one will go to china. They simply get what they deserve.

    71. Re:The other kinds of Indians by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I agree. You do treat those you conquer well. Oh, when are you bringing back slavery? Because as long as you treat them better then any other slaves in history it's okay :)

    72. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same situation... I don't know who to sue to right these ancestral slights. I've considered suing latter-day Norwegians (for slaughtering my British ancestors) and Brits (for prejudicial behaviour when my Viking ancestors came calling) .... oh dear. I could wind up suing myself. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    73. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Trent05 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure many a Greek, Babylonian, and Roman thought the same way.

      Wow, great point!! As long as you ignore the fact there is a global economy, we have a great education system* to keep it going, and as pissed off as people are at the US, I can't think of anyone other than some extremist wackos that'd want to physically harm us.

      *Our education system isn't the best, but I'd never say it was due to lack of resources. I wish the planet had the libraries, public television, and other free resources we have. I wish the people here would realize what they had and took greater advantage of it.

      --


      --
      The Marines: The few, the proud, the not very bright. - Slashdot tagline 04/21/05
    74. Re:The other kinds of Indians by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I'm willing to bet in 300 years we'll have gotten past the whole 'Nation' thing and we'll be prosperous and there will be plenty for everyone. It's likely said prosperity will have been spurred by freedom. Reference 'The Federation' as depicted in Star Trek TNG as one possible scenario. (not the Original 'Cold War' Star Trek, tho)

      It'd take a pretty massive shift in the fundamental philosophy of US culture for it to evolve into "The Federation".

    75. Re:The other kinds of Indians by cammoblammo · · Score: 1
      Given the fact you can't spell Maori or Aborigine, I'll assume you don't know any.

      I've lived in both New Zealand and Australia, and know, or have known, a lot of each. Yes, there are those who sit down and whinge all day, wishing they they had a fairer deal and blaming the injustices of the past (and the present) for it.

      I also know a lot of Pakehas/White Fellas (in fact, I am one myself) who sit down and whinge all day, wishing they they had a fairer deal and blaming the injustices of the past (and the present) for it.

      And of course, I know a lot of all three races who are quite hard working and industrious. Now most Maori I know are still upset that the Pakeha Government has no intention of ever honouring the Treaty of Waitangi. And many Aborigines I know feel the injustice of having their land ripped off them, told that it should never have happened, and are forced to watch while it still happens regardless.

      Most Aborigines I know, and there are a lot around where I live, would happily give every cent they own in order to be able to reconnect with their land.

      Granted, all of these races have problems, but so do ours. They might drink a bit more and brawl a bit in public, but hey, white fellas send their children to church for sex and throw their old people into prison because they're not wanted.

      These issues aren't quite as black and white as you seem to think.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    76. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How bout the Jews? Some cracker cooked a few and they get a country in their "ancestral lands", far more of your tax dollar per year than any greasy injun, and a nuclear bomb.

      Those native americans who weren't killed from the mere exposure to the diseased carcass of the white man were rounded up and shot.

    77. Re:The other kinds of Indians by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      Yeah, he has way too much in the way of firearms. Hes always collected things and never used them. He has a black powder rifle as well that hes taken out hunting maybe 3 times. Some pieces are limited edition, never been fired pieces.

      A couple are very very old(that he was given or bought). An AK-47 and a mossberg shotgun with a collapsable stock (with a fair amount of ammo for both) were too good a deal to pass up at the price (like $600 for all of it).

      He hunts, and one of my brothers goes with him. Theres probably 5 rifles from his stock that they choose from to use though. He also keeps a shotgun loaded in his bedroom; but thankfully hasn't needed to use it, and hopefull never will.

      2 of the hunting rifles were to repay a debt froma friend, who borrowed some money and realized he wouldn't be able to pay it back in a reasonable amount of time; so he paid in guns...only in the south :)

      2 pistols were gifts, and another is a small .38 semi i think that he keeps at work for when hes there by himself. The other shotguns he used years ago for duck hunting or some such, but not much since; most of the rifles never get touched (even an AR-15 he had built; we still don't know why he bothered; and I doubt he's even checked the action on the AK he bought)

      When he buys *anything* (as in TP , light bulbs, or candy) he gets it in bulk, which explains at least 2000 rounds of 7.62mm ammo alone; which is probably more than he'll ever use in his lifetime. The shotgun ammo likely won't ever be used; but his hunting ammo will over time since that *is* something he does regularly during the season; though Im not into guns too much so I cant recall what rifles he uses to hunt with.

      I doubt hed ever fire at someone if they were attacking him when he was armed; wouldn't want the risk; I guess it just makes him *feel* more secure.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    78. Re:The other kinds of Indians by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Assuming these shells are fired with the same amount of propellant as a normal bullet, it will not vaporize. A bullet needs to be going pretty fast to vaporize. Especially a U-depleted shell.

      The power of U-depleted bullets come from its mass: they are denser. Why is this a good thing?

      E = .5mv^2.

      As the energy components drops off exponentially, the mass remains constant.

      For example:

      Two bullets impact an object at 200 m/s. One is a depleted round, one is not.

      Mass of depleted round: 200 mg
      Mass of regular round: 100 mg

      Energy at impact of depleted round: 4000000 j.
      Energy at impact of regular round: 2000000 j.

      These numbers are (slightly) off, and nevermind the units (it's too early for latin prefixes), but it gets the point across. Look up the atomic weights of Uranium and Lead, Ratio U/L, see how much more energy U has than L.

      There's nothing special about U-depleted bullets that they should vaporize on impact anymore than a normal bullet. Uranium might be more brittle than lead, and shatter on impact, but vaporize?

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    79. Re:The other kinds of Indians by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      Or, perhaps, it will take a major breakdown of the stereotypes of folks like you, who refer to a 'US culture' as this 'evile thing' endangering the whole world.

      The countless people struggling to get across the border into the US and participate in the free economy here are testimony enough. Spreading the 'US form of government' is not a colonial undertaking.

      But I am certain that for people of a certain age and disposition (and those who choose to remain arrested at that age philosophically), it's more comforting to believe in homespun parodies and stereotypes (the 'ugly american', 'big business', 'evile fundie republican') than it is to grow up, recognize the truth, and live in the real world. I know *I* grew out of that shit radical/liberal mindset.

      It's certainly more rewarding in a visceral sense to run around ranting 'Anti-Bush' bullshit than to think. Just like it was in the 'Anti-Reagan' days. Enjoy your subculture. Prepare to look back on yourself as having been a stupid fuck twenty years from now.

    80. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      >I am not special and nowhere near unique; there are millions of people who do this kind of stuff all the time ...

      Yes, there are.
      Out of 8 billions, there are millions like you (I would say 20-30m) which means that people like you are a tiny minority.

      > Learned the lanuage and cultutre, went to Uni., etc.

      It'd be interesting if you englightened us on how you paid for your Uni while in a foreign country. Maybe American Indians could follow your recipe!

    81. Re:The other kinds of Indians by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      How about I come round and conquer you ? Maybe once I've beaten the crap out of you and raped your partner I'll let you sleep in the dog kennel.

    82. Re:The other kinds of Indians by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      When you're asleep.

    83. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It'd be interesting if you englightened us on how you paid for your Uni while in a foreign country. Maybe American Indians could follow your recipe!

      While the lazy won't find scholarships, they are out there. I know a couple who are independent from their parents. Since they fall under a low income bracket, one gets to go to Uni for free, the other gets paid to get her education. A kid from Malaysia gets free tuition from a company he will be working for. Good grades and research - that's how you get scholarships.

    84. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      double it's size

      "its".

    85. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "democratically elected government of Saudi Arabia"?

      Are you retarted? Do you truely have no clue?

      1) Saudia Arabia is not, and has never been a democracy. It's a fucking feodal monarchy.

      2) Al Qaida wants a religious government there. They don't like the corrupt monarchy. The USA supports this impopular and corrupt regime because they have oil.

      The Saudi government is a dictatorship. This does not make Al-Quaida right in their reasons to oppose them. But that doesn't make the Saudi gov't right either.

      Fucking retard.

    86. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any reason the rich parasites that support Bush can't just work instead of focus on concentrating assets in their hands?

      Personally, I find it far less objectionable for a tribe to have some broad based ownership of tribal lands than the type of sick concentration of assets we see in secular American society.

    87. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a rural white American that moved to Silicon Valley to find work, I was in no sense greeted by "my" culture.

      I _can_ understand why Native Americans don't want to move among outsiders-is is really hard.

    88. Re:The other kinds of Indians by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Greece, Rome, and Babylon also had great economies and educational systems. They fell. The US will also fall one day. Rome lasted for 2000 years. The US is only 228 years old, a punk teenager as far as empires go (and apparently has the attitude to match).

    89. Re:The other kinds of Indians by corbettw · · Score: 1

      The Saudi government is a dictatorship.

      Really? Are you sure, Mr. Coward? If you're so smart, can you do me a favor? Next time you want to give out lessons on important stuff, can you include a definition of "sarcasm". I'm a little hazy on the meaning of that term, though I do see an awful lot of it around here.

      Thanks bunches.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    90. Re:The other kinds of Indians by jtev · · Score: 1

      The whole shell doesn't vaporize, it does vaporize the armor it hits. Also tank rounds are fired at a higher velocity than medium caliber rounds. Both large cal, and medium cal are made from DU for their armor peircing.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    91. Re:The other kinds of Indians by really? · · Score: 1

      OK, perhaps there aren't too many people like me, but, there are plenty.

      As for how I paid for Uni, I worked. While many of my colleagues were taking five courses at a time I was taking only four and working almost full time. Did this three semesters a year - technically, trimesters, I guess - and ended up taking more overall courses.
      There have been many semesters where I spent, basically, 9 to 17 at the Uni and 23 to 7 at work during the week, and 24 hours at work on weekends. When I finished, double major, I went on a trip around the world instead of rushing to get a job and pay off my loans, as many of my colleagues had to do. Sure, a lot of people had more fun in Uni than I did, but he who laughs last ...

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    92. Re:The other kinds of Indians by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Or, perhaps, it will take a major breakdown of the stereotypes of folks like you, who refer to a 'US culture' as this 'evile thing' endangering the whole world.

      Not as much as the stereotypes you project on the rest of the world, it seems.

      I hadn't even considered the things you are talking about, I was thinking merely of the selfish, "win at all costs", "every man for himself", "fuck you if you disagree with me", "our way is the only way", "no compromises" attitudes that the typical American embodies.

      I repeat, it would take a fundamental shift in current American culture and philosophy to produce "The Federation". "The Federation" may represent the "American Dream", perhaps even the way some Americans like to perceive themselves, but it certainly doesn't reflect current American society, or anything like it. Certainly, the US isn't going to product a society free of poverty and want, and the elimination of any desire or need for material wealth on its current path (the hallmarks of "The Federation").

      But, hey, maybe that "fundamental shift" could come from a world-shattering conflict and a dogma-shattering meeting with an advanced alien species.

    93. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The culturally conservative attitude that keeps tribal people on reservations, despite the severe economic disadvantages, has also preserved their cultures (and the environments in which they develop) for thousands of generations. A thousand years from now, the USA blip very well might be more forgotten than hunting mammoths. What goes around, comes around, and the USA has certainly pushed a lot around, which we're now seeing come home to roost.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    94. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Moofie · · Score: 1

      There is no virtue in preserving a culture for its own sake. Culture is valuable only insofar as it advances the interests of its adherents. Cultures that do not do that should, naturally, go by the wayside.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    95. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I guess you missed the part where American tribal culture has kept its human carriers alive, and mostly thriving, for thousands of generations. Culture preserves itself, riding the gene pool to perpetuate the meme pool. The alcohol, welfare, pity and other depradations are recent additions to tribal culture. Hardly a natural end, or even stagnation, of tribal culture - it's just the kinder, gentler genocide that enlists culture in its own slower selfdestruction.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    96. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Moofie · · Score: 1

      But if the culture is not robust against alcohol, welfare, and pity (none of which are intrinsically fatal), then it is not robust enough to preserve itself.

      If the native culture is thriving, then there's no problem. If it's not, there's still no problem, as its adherents will be assimilated into the mainstream culture, or not, according to their own preferences.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    97. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It still exists, and does thrive in many places, and in many ways. FWIW, there are reportedly more people alive today with tribal ancestry than ever before, though native ecology would hardly call that "success" without reckoning the cost, especially in sustainability to future generations. There is much value in a culture that can sustain the genocide and continuing oppositions, including the vampiric welfare state, though it buckles under heavy opposition. As America ages, and more sown problems are reaped, we will do well to learn from these tribal cultures, and their resilience. Unless we continue to destroy them to insignificance, and disappearance. Assimilation works both ways, when it works well.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    98. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Moofie · · Score: 1

      So, again...what's the problem?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    99. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the conquest, it's you breaking treaties that means they're owed restitution.

    100. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, why should the Indians be treated any different? Just because they were so weak militarily and behind the times in military technology doesn't mean they deserve protection from the rest of the world. They simply get what the rest of the world, or whoever conquers them, decides that they should get. And US citizens wonder why so many want to kill you, at whatever cost to themselves...

      Do you think if the Indians won, they would have given the white man affermative action?

    101. Re:The other kinds of Indians by syn3rg · · Score: 1

      My Great-Grandfather left the "Rez" because he didn't want that life for his children. I'm sure it was hard, but he had ambition. Since then the family has done well for themselves -- without playing the "race card".

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    102. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Moofie · · Score: 1

      The question is not how many people CHOOSE to do this. The question is how many people are FREE to do this, and that number is much larger.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  14. Inconvenience factor by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Rural Sourcing's fees are about the same as the overall cost of using an Indian outsourcer, she said--if you consider factors such as communication costs, travel expenses and inconvenience.

    What I'd like to know is how much money the "inconvenience" factor counts for . . . Sounds like a catch-all category for costs that is used to magiacally make rural sourcing as cheap as outsourcing to India.

    1. Re:Inconvenience factor by Kogase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then there's the added PR benefit of hiring Americans rather than Indians. Of course, it still doesn't help Americans who are worth a damn, but it's all about the PR...

    2. Re:Inconvenience factor by winkydink · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's referred to as a "soft cost". They can be very difficult to quantify, so, yes, there is probably some fudging of the number to make it work. However, the "inconvenience factor" as well as cultural differences are two of the items you will see on almost every outsourcing pros & cons list.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    3. Re:Inconvenience factor by Quikah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have been on several projects which involved business units on the other side of the world. There are times when you basically lose a day because you find something in the morning that needs the other team to fix. This can be mitigated by forcing one team or the other to shift their work schedule, but this can cause other problems for the team who are forced to change.

      Also if you are dealing with hardware it is a lot easier to get something overnighted in country than having to deal with customs.

      --
      Q.
    4. Re:Inconvenience factor by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      as cultural differences are two of the items you will see on almost every outsourcing pros & cons list. and there's no cultural differences between a former farm hand from Alambama and an investment banker from NYC. No sir...

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    5. Re:Inconvenience factor by winkydink · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that's how outsourcing relationships work. Investment bankers talk directly to farm workers. Perhaps comparing the cultural differences between Manhattan IT workers and Arkansas IT workers? Hmmm?

      A classic example that I've heard in more than one outsourcing pros & cons presentation. Indian outsourcers will do exactly what you say. As soon as you tell them to go, they'll put resources on the project and hammer the bits until it's done. What they will not do, because it is much more of an American cultural thing, is challenge your original direction, even if it is a stupid idea and there's a better way to do it.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    6. Re:Inconvenience factor by angryelephant · · Score: 1

      I can attest to this. I work out of San Diego. Three of the other centers I work with on my project on a regular basis are spread around Europe. Just getting a reply on an email takes overnight. Getting actual work done involves open some sort of trackable item (ie create an error in the database, create a change request, etc.) instead of just walking down to the cube down the hall.

      Keep in mind this isn't outsourced work; it is just different centers of the same corporation.

    7. Re:Inconvenience factor by The+FooMiester · · Score: 1

      Scranton, Pennsylvania has been getting these "wonderful" call center jobs for some time now. Cigna, Fleet, RCN, various telemarketing firms . . .

      They pay crap. They know where people stand out here, and exactly how much they'll work for. They've done studies. How else do you come up with rates like $9.07/hr

      I'm tired of it all.

      --
      The previous has been a secret message to my comrades.
  15. WHITE IS RIGHT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The end of the article:

    If White is right, it will be good news for American techies-at least the ones in rural communities and those willing to move there.

    If White is right? Interesting choice of words for an article about rural sourcing vs india. ;)

    1. Re:WHITE IS RIGHT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why capitalization matters. Since White is capitalized, we can clearly see that they are speaking of a specific person.

    2. Re:WHITE IS RIGHT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still funny you nitpicking homo

    3. Re:WHITE IS RIGHT! by gears5665 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the word you want is pedantic.

    4. Re:WHITE IS RIGHT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is still funny you pedantic homo.

    5. Re:WHITE IS RIGHT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      k, fixed thx.

  16. Just what we need... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yet another language barrier to surmount.

    At least the guys in Mumbai are *trying* to enunciate.

    (I grew up somewhere that has a native accent thicker than Brooklyn's, and currently live in North Carolina, so I have a legal right to make these jokes)

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    1. Re:Just what we need... by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they were talking about midwest rural - you know, the kind of people that actually can be understood by most Americans.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:Just what we need... by filtur · · Score: 1
      I grew up somewhere that has a native accent thicker than Brooklyn...

      Boston?
      Is the monitor plugged into the video caaad?

    3. Re:Just what we need... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Hawai'i.

      You can't even mimick Hawai'ian style pidgin with creative spelling... you just have to hear it for yourself.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  17. Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by darth_MALL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not according to This. It appears the 'rural' states aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.

    this post intended to be humerous and or ironic. please treat as such.

    1. Re:Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by kesler · · Score: 0

      Are you going to disparage the red states?
      I say mod parent up..

    2. Re:Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by Metzli · · Score: 1

      That graph reminds me of the motto when I live in Arkansas, "Thank God for Mississippi."

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    3. Re:Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by Drachemorder · · Score: 1

      Funny, we have a saying like that here in Mississippi: "Thank God for Arkansas."

    4. Re:Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by cmpalmer · · Score: 4, Informative

      While I understand the attempt at humor, it should be noted (to the humor and research impaired) that the data is this graph is completely made up...

      http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/stateiq.as p

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
    5. Re:Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, we have a saying like that here in Mississippi: "Thank God for Arkansas."

      For being something to aspire to? Remember, Mississippi is or nearly dead last in most performance indicators. Arkansas is bad, just not quite as bad Mississippi.

    6. Re:Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I dn't remember taking an IQ test when I voted... How can this be true?

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    7. Re:Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by smyle · · Score: 1
      ...and in an effort to show how superior the writer was, they got the two-letter abbreviation for Kansas wrong.

      (intended with as much humor and irony as the parent)

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    8. Re:Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, 2 morons modded this 'Interesting'.

    9. Re:Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by totipotentsoul · · Score: 1

      Try these two then: http://www2.hawaii.edu/~bergen/bush.html http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/20263/ come on, hoax or not, do you really think it could be false that the average level of education is higher in Massachusetts and New York than Alabama and Mississippi? People in rural states aren't inherently ignorant, just ignorant.

      --
      The best posts are both flamebait and informative.
    10. Re:Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a related note can be found this.

  18. Home sweet home! by graveyardduckx · · Score: 0

    So there is hope for South Carolina!

    1. Re:Home sweet home! by meabolex · · Score: 1

      *Looks around*

      Where?

      --
      FORTUNE FAVORS IRONY
  19. Dont see how this would work... by Kenja · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the prices I've seen listed, it would be illigal to employ Americans (or even Amerucuns) for anything even close to the same amount.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Dont see how this would work... by Vicsun · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are supposedly also taking into account communication costs, travel expenses and inconveniences.

    2. Re:Dont see how this would work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA - the additional communication costs etc. Wages aren't everything (although the article is weak on exactly how those costs scale with team size).

      However, your point is still valid. Where can I get 20 IIT graduates in the US for any cost? OK, Sun, Microsoft, HP, and Google don't count.

    3. Re:Dont see how this would work... by Kenja · · Score: 1
      "They are supposedly also taking into account communication costs, travel expenses and inconveniences."

      Fair enough, however when you take all those things into acount and add managability and quality control outsourceing NEVER looked good. The reason that outsourcing is "hot" right now is because the higher ups in a company can use it for a short term drop in costs yielding a quick boost in stock price. The long term benifits of it are nonexistant. So even if everything else is factored in, you just cant beat 10$ a day per programmer (a price I saw quoted for outsourced work to some third world hell hole).

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:Dont see how this would work... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think the idea is to pay Americans the same wage as Indians. I think the idea is to have the same effective cost per employee. The fact that Indians are half-way around the world tends to result in a lot of hidden costs. These hidden costs add up and make an Indian worker just as expensive as a cheap American worker.

    5. Re:Dont see how this would work... by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what you aren't factoring in is the cost of lost customers due to shitty foreign tech support. When Dell moved tech support overseas customers were incensed at the horrible english of the foreign workers and Dell foresaw a huge impact on repeat business. So they moved the tech support back to the US, and people stopped complaining.

    6. Re:Dont see how this would work... by hagbard5235 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually... the idea is to get the same cost per unit output. No one in business really cares how much they pay their employees (or at least no one with any brains). What they care about is what they have to pay per unit output. If hiring a rural-american to costs $30/hour, and they produce 10 widgets/hour, and hiring an Indian costs $5/hour and they produce 1 widget/hour, you'd have to be incredibly dim to hire the Indian ($5/widget) vs the rural-american ($3/widget). It's all about costs and productivity.

      Outsourcing can incur serious productivity losses due to time differences, distance, coordination difficulties etc.

      What's really killing a lot of states is business unfriendly laws and taxes. If you add costs to employeeing someone through taxes and regulation, then they either have to take a lower wage (thus bringing costs back down to parity) or have greater productivity (thus bringing cost/widget back in line). A lot of states seem to completely fail to realized this.

    7. Re:Dont see how this would work... by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      True plus imagine what you could hire college students for. Especially if they were able to take calls in their house/dorm during certain hours of the day. Most already have at least a waorking knowledge of computers and speak at least passable english.

  20. Hacking inthe heartland by amightywind · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I landed in the Kansas City area after the bubble burst in Boston. Living costs are quite modest here, and it is a pleasant place to live. The hacking is the same. That does not stop my company from outsourcing to India though. Slavery is very attractive to business.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Hacking inthe heartland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get back to work before I inform Mr. S___t about your post! :)

    2. Re:Hacking inthe heartland by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kansas City is not rural. It may be a shade smaller than Boston, but if you've gotta drive more than 10-15 minutes to see farmland, you're not in a rural area. KC spans 2 friggin' states, has professional sports teams, and more than 1 Wal-Mart. Rural areas generally do none of those things.

    3. Re:Hacking inthe heartland by slumpy · · Score: 1

      WOOOOOOOO.....Kansas City!!!!! Uh, that's where I live, so I gotta give a "props" post.

      --
      http://www.commaecho.com
    4. Re:Hacking inthe heartland by JollyFinn · · Score: 1

      Yes kansas city is VERY rural, it doesn't even have triple only over double the population of capital of european union ...

      --
      Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
    5. Re:Hacking inthe heartland by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      But if you drive for 15 minutes in any other direction, you're still in a city, right? I probably should've said "~15 minutes in any direction puts you in amid fields" to make that properly explicit. :)

      And who grows hay in KC? Surely that's wheat or something? That land has gotta have more value than just a few alfalfa bales per year... ;)

    6. Re:Hacking inthe heartland by amightywind · · Score: 1

      Dude, there have an ultimate Walmart just a few miles from me in Overland Park. Talk about the good life.

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
    7. Re:Hacking inthe heartland by raile · · Score: 1

      Yes, Kansas City most definitely has its rural areas. Even Johnson County -- supposedly one of the 10th wealthiest counties in the nation (at least was at one time) -- has plenty of rural zones in it. Go take a drive around 151st and Anticoch sometime. A nice dichotomy of 3000 sq. ft. houses and the farms they're swallowing up as Overland Park marches southward.

  21. What's better? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

    Tech support that doesn't speak English or tech support that doesn't speak English?

    Ye'll get a complimentary bottle of genuine moonshine with that new LCD monitor if ye buy it today.

    1. Re:What's better? by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I believe you mean "tech support what don't speak English."

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    2. Re:What's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "genuine moonshine with that new LCD monitor if ye buy it today"

      Yes, the character we all love to hate, a shakespearean southern hick.

    3. Re:What's better? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Yes, the character we all love to hate, a shakespearean southern hick.

      In fact, some claim that people living around the Globe Theatre in Shakespeare's time spoke with what sounds like an American southern accent.

  22. manuel castells arguably predicted this by mqx · · Score: 5, Interesting


    In his trilogy on "the information age", manuel castells looked at the evolving and future structure of current society. One of his suggestions, which I remember clearly, is to forget looking at first, second and third world as being rigidly defined around countries (i.e. the idea that some are "first", others are "second", etc).

    He suggests that the world is really becoming a patchwork of first, second and third - so that even so called advanced countries (on average) have third world areas, and even third world countries have first world areas. When you look at it this way, then it shouldn't be surprising about "outsourcing" from advanced economic zones (e.g. SF) to third world zones (e.g. places in the deep south).

    Either way, I found this conceptual idea of his to be a very powerful one.

    1. Re:manuel castells arguably predicted this by benhocking · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have not read the book, but it does sound interesting. However, comparing "places in the deep south" to third world countries either (a) overestimates poverty in the deep south (depth and breadth), (b) underestimates poverty in third world countries, or (c) both. I'm not saying poverty doesn't exist in the U.S. - it definitely does - but it does not compare to poverty in third world countries!

      --
      Ben Hocking
      Need a professional organizer?
    2. Re:manuel castells arguably predicted this by gears5665 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      yeah, but I don't want to employ/reward those Bush-voting welfare-stealing southerners with my consumer dollars.

      I don't mind outsourcing to Ireland or England (as was done in the 80s). These countries share my social values.

      India doesn't. The South doesn't. China Doesn't.

      Let them rot.

    3. Re:manuel castells arguably predicted this by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      Except in most "first-world" countries, there are legal barriers to the development of 2nd or 3rd-world areas within their bounds. It would be illegal anywhere in the US to employ someone for the same amount as in Bangladesh. And our minimum wage laws aren't even that high! Some European countries have legal minimum wages set at the equivalent of US $30/hour! There are plenty of other things, like liability rules, minimum insurance levels, safety regulations, etc that would make the employment practices of a third world country simply impossible in an advanced country.

      Think about it for a minute. San Francisco is the most expensive city to live in the the US, and the price level of goods only 20% above the national average. The difference between San Francisco and Kansas is worlds away from the difference between either and any third world country. The average person in LA probably makes $40,000 a year, the average person in Alabama makes something like $20,000 a year, and I just looked it up and the number for average person in Afghanistan is $700. That just doesn't compare.

    4. Re:manuel castells arguably predicted this by UWC · · Score: 1

      With a few exceptions (e.g. some Appalachian areas which not only are amazingly poverty-stricken but also seem to utilize some vestiges of Middle English), you're right. I've been all over much of the Southeast (born and raised in Tennessee, though near Nashville), which seems to be getting the most bashing in this discussion, and while I've definitely run across various seemingly backwards areas, none have been conspicuously missing essentials. Cars might be older, but they're still cars. People will have electricity, food, and shelter, even if they're not necessarily to the standards that many would want. I think mass media and more reliable roads and vehicles have helped. Rural areas are no longer totally isolated, geographically or informationally. Like I said, they may not be cosmopolitan, but they're certainly not "third world."

      I have to admit that I've not been to Mississippi or Arkansas, though. (Whee, hypocrisy at work! Though it's true that I've not been there.)

      I'd also like to note that "redneck," "hillbilly," and other stereotypes are not limited to this chunk of the country. My limited experience in the eastern midwest has turned up substantial evidence that redneckism is not geographially bound, though accents may vary.

      Also, "y'all" is much more practical for disambiguating between singular and plural forms of "you" than midwest forms such as "y'ins," which I can only assume is derived from "you ones."

    5. Re:manuel castells arguably predicted this by UWC · · Score: 1

      So... you base business decisions on but a few percentage points of differing opinion? There were many states whose electoral votes went to Kerry by only a couple points. Same with these apparently reprehensible states that gave their votes to Bush. If you look at county-by-county results in much of the south, there were many that swung away from Bush, and many that didn't. Broad generalizations based on the opinions of a slim majority, while apparently effective in politics, strikes me as pretty stupid when applied to general life. Take Texas for example. It was one of the biggest Bush wins with something like 65% of the vote going to Bush, yet there seems to be a pretty big tech industry in cities like Austin.

      Or you might have been sarcastic, I don't know. It seems somewhat contrived to propose business boycotts of India, China, and, hey, let's throw a slightly more conservative chunk of the US in there, too.

    6. Re:manuel castells arguably predicted this by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      but it does not compare to poverty in third world countries

      Another 4 years of Dubya, and it will!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    7. Re:manuel castells arguably predicted this by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Take a look at some indian reservations in the southwest and north west. There you will see third world conditions.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    8. Re:manuel castells arguably predicted this by mqx · · Score: 1


      Firstly, I used "places in the deep south" figuratively, not literally. I'm not even an American, I've only been there a few times, so I was searching for a stereotype that would convey my meaning. Don't read my argument as being literal - I wasn't actually comparing in detail.

      Secondly, I agree that it is doubtful whether the arid poverty of some third world countries will ever be present in a first world country, at least now, but don't discount it for the future: plenty of sci-fi and social circumstances could lead to a society where there is a nasty gap between the rich and the poor, even in a so-called first world country.

      Thirdly, I don't profess to explain the ideas of Manuel Castells anywhere near as well as he does: his works are amazing for the grounding in actual deal and evidence (in this respect, he reminds me of Noam Chomsky). I suggest you read his works, because like you said "I have not read the book, but it does sound interesting", and like I said, I can't explain them as well.

    9. Re:manuel castells arguably predicted this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I make a guess? I guess that you are white and fat.

    10. Re:manuel castells arguably predicted this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can I make a guess? I guess that you are white and fat.
      ...because when you're a starving, swollen-belly kid in Somalia, the first thing that comes to your mind is social studies and economic analysis.
  23. Funny, that... by Kronovohr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While in a manner of speaking I'm all for this, it's already been done to death.

    Throughout the last 100-someodd years, the rest of the US has looked to the South as "cheap labor" -- most of the factories that've closed here paid just at or barely above minimum wage, with no option for any real pay raises, and offer conditions that no state in the North would accept. Perhaps this is just a return to that trend. I can only hope that the trend of severe employee abuse won't carry over.

    1. Re:Funny, that... by Sammy76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. Besides, the costs in India/China etc are lower because people are, by and large restricted to their countries of birth because of social ties and immigration laws. Thus, when a huge wage disparity exists betweens two countries for identical work, corporations can exploit this inequality for a signifigant period of time until migration and expectations in the cheaper country even out the cost.

      Here in the US, people will just move to wherever the jobs are. There are no political restrictions on this, and they are still less than a 6 hour plane flight from friends and family. Rural costs will quickly adapt to metropolitan costs. Plus, this plan will probably just lead to urban sprawl, with the rural areas tapping into the largest city for labor and encouraging a slow migration of the urban areas to the new sites.

    2. Re:Funny, that... by jdcook · · Score: 0

      The flip side of that is the South has marketed itself as a source of cheap labor. It has not invested in the education of its citizens. It has doled out huge tax incentives to manufacturers. And it is closer and closer to being tthird-worlded every day. The North transfers a lot of money in the form of federal taxes/spending to the South. When will they learn some self-reliance?

      --
      Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
    3. Re:Funny, that... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Throughout the last 100-someodd years, the rest of the US has looked to the South as "cheap labor" -- most of the factories that've closed here paid just at or barely above minimum wage, with no option for any real pay raises, and offer conditions that no state in the North would accept.

      I have to disagree. All of the textile plants that I've worked in that shut down, had people doing unskilled labor for $12-$15/hour, which is an outrageous amount of money in small, Southern towns.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:Funny, that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the flip side of THAT is that for 150 years, the South has not been the preferred destination of industry. In order to get industry, which brings jobs, which brings income (which brings Federal tax income), the Southern states do, in fact, get down on their knees to the likes of Mercedes, Saturn, etc., and polish the old bishop with a tax break or two. No tax break, no industry, no jobs. No jobs, no Federal taxes paid, no food on the table. You do the math.

      If you, in the North, really resent the money you send South in the form of Federal taxes, perhaps you can console yourself with the superior standard of living that you enjoy. Then you can consider the fact that much of this financial trouble and lack of industry (and, to be honest, lack of quality education) is a continuing aftershock from the post-Civil-war Reconstruction. Perhaps, while you're blaming the stupid rednecks for being stupid rednecks, you can also blame the carpetbaggers and scalawags who, despite the best intentions of President Lincoln, treated the post-war South as a conquered nation rather than a wayward child returned home. We treated post-war Germany better than we treated the Deep South. The effects are still showing, like it or not. Oh, sure, Atlanta's been rebuilt, but the economic damage done hasn't fully healed.

  24. Hope by Talian · · Score: 1

    As a network/security engineer from Arkansas who had to move to get a job, this gives me hope. Not in the immediate, but its good to see things spread out, and some tech hit the rural south. Hopefully better things to come eventually.

  25. Send em to Ohio by randomErr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Send those jobs to Toledo. Our government is into massive deficit spending.

    We need work!!!!!!!!!!

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Send em to Ohio by RailGunner · · Score: 1
      So quit electing Carty Finkbeiner then.

      And for the rest of you slashdotters - Help this guy get a job - buy Libbey Glass! Or buy a Jeep. Jeep's still open there, isn't it?

      /native of Toledo... moved to Texas

    2. Re:Send em to Ohio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you should have asked before the election. Can you wait another four years?

  26. It's a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a well known hoax that started in 2000 with Gore and that was updated in 2004 with Kerry's name. People seem to believe anything they see on the internet.

    1. Re:It's a hoax by darth_MALL · · Score: 1

      *ahem* - "this post intended to be humerous and or ironic. please treat as such." - Please see link in sig.

  27. Joy by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    So now techies are going to start learning to speak redneck instead of hindi?

    Anyway, I think this is better than having things outsourced to India. It is governed under American law so I feel more comfortable with them having sensitive data than someone in India, they are fluent in English (well, thats debatable) and American customs and nuances, and keeping those jobs on this side of the pond helps our economy.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Joy by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I'm not real sure that US law is any more protective of the privacy of US citizens that Hindi law is. Sometimes it seems it would be hard to be less protective. (There are actual laws on the books, but there isn't any enforcement provision. This means that anyone who feels like it can break them without worrying, but if they want to stick it to you, they've got an easy handle.)

      Many times US law seems to be actually significantly LESS protective of individual rights than no law at all. Not (usually)in the direct statement of the law, but rather in the way it is used and enforced.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Joy by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      So now techies are going to start learning to speak redneck instead of hindi?

      I can see it now:

      "Get off my line!"

      "Hey! How's your...modem..."

      "Yeeehaaa! Yer mailbox is full!

      Just what we need. Tech support by Leonard, Bubba, Billy Ray and the Coot. Redneck Rampage goes hi-tech.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:Joy by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      So now techies are going to start learning to speak redneck instead of hindi?

      That sounds alright by me.

  28. English by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    But I live in England you insensitive clod!

    Seriously, there will always be less advanced areas of any country where folks will work for less than in the big cities.
    The worst part about all this outsourcing, especially for certain things, is that the new lower paid employees do not have the local knowledge required to handle clients. Sure, some things can be handled extremely well, but theres a great swath of things that simply don't work.

    I'm not talking specifically about the language barrier, though that obviously is a part of it, I'm talking about people not understanding basic country specific details.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  29. Re:Rural America? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1, Troll

    No, land of the fundamentalist Christians. They all used to be Democrats!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  30. New call-center hold music. by Kenja · · Score: 3, Funny
    Some folks'lll never eat a skunk
    But then again, some folks'll
    Like Cletus, the slack-jawed yokel

    Most folks'll never lose a toe
    But then again, some folks'll
    Like Cletus, the slack-jawed yokel

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:New call-center hold music. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      Cletus in the call center: I could call my ma from in here...

      HEY MA! GET OFF THE DANG ROOF!

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    2. Re:New call-center hold music. by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Boy, you'd better not put people on hold long with that music. That's what, 20 seconds at most (generous; I sang it at 16 seconds for both verses), so three repetitions per minute? Yikes, you'd damn well better like Cletus!

      Get's 'em off that there phoner thingee, I reckon.

    3. Re:New call-center hold music. by Kenja · · Score: 1
      "Boy, you'd better not put people on hold long with that music. That's what, 20 seconds at most (generous; I sang it at 16 seconds for both verses), so three repetitions per minute?"

      Well, there should be about 20min of banjo solos thrown in.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:New call-center hold music. by noslayer33 · · Score: 1
      Or perhaps the ever popular Stan Rogers "White collar hollar" (cue chain gang)
      "Well, I rise up every morning at a quarter to eight.
      Some woman who's my wife tells me not to be late
      I kiss the kids goodbye, I can't remember their names.
      And week after week, it's always the same..

      And it's Ho, boys, can't you code it, and program it right
      Nothing ever happens in the life of mine
      I'm hauling up the data on the Xerox line...
  31. The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 1

    "...as sending jobs to India."

    *smacks head against wall*

    Sure. Let's keep ALL work in the US - I mean, if outsourcing IT work is bad, why is outsourcing say banana production good? surely if outsourcing IT work is wrong because "it sends jobs overseas" then ALL work which does this is wrong?

    So all the jobs which are more cheaply done overseas would then be done more expensively in the US (and they would be more expensive, because they're *already* done in the cheapest and most efficient locations, which means, when appropriate, overseas), and so everything they make costs more, which means we all have less real wealth, since bananas now cost say a dollar a piece, which means there is, in the larger picture, less money to invest in making more money in the future, so the annual growth rate is lowered, and so we all find our year-in year-out living standards rising more slowly than they otherwise would, and there are that many fewer jobs pretty much everywhere in the economy, since it's growing more slowly, because if you make one sector cost more, all the sectors which depend on it cost more, and all the sectors depending on them cost more, and so on and so on.

    But hey, we've got to protect ourselves, right? and that means keeping jobs at home.

    --
    Toby

    1. Re:The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      YOU try growin' a banana tree in Pennsylvania.

    2. Re:The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by bearwayne · · Score: 1

      if outsourcing IT work is bad, why is outsourcing say banana production good?

      Uh, maybe bananas require specific environmental conditions that mostly exist in other countries (e.g. the Central American ones) whereas IT only requires technology infrastructure that can be built pretty much anywhere.

    3. Re:The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Some people, such as yourself, care about the long term. Other people, such as protectionists, care about the short term. The long term reality is that standards of living between here and India will eventually even out, but many people here want to maintain our advantage for as long as we can.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by The+Great+Stormrider · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that you've never had to deal with someone working tech support from India then, have you? Last time I checked ya don't have to talk to someone from India to buy a bannana

    5. Re:The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The long term reality is that standards of living between here and India will eventually even out, but many people here want to maintain our advantage for as long as we can.

      WRONG! The standards of living may even out on a statistical basis, but they will never even out on any level of reality. The reason for that is that savings obtained through outsourcing are not passed on to consumers, they are hoarded by the managerial staff in the corporation. Your idea of equalization through outsourcing is just as absurd as communism, and for the same reason...human nature.

    6. Re:The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1) You ignored the point of the article: moving jobs to rural areas is as cheap as sending them to India. In other words, there is an economic incentive to keep them here.

      (2) Software is not like growing bananas. What people want is to keep the good jobs (intellectually stimulating and well-paid) here. What is happening is that the US is sending all the good jobs overseas. Unemployed workers will take boring, poorly-paid jobs. The world will begin to look to India rather than the US for technology. The lower paying jobs means the country has less ability to turn the tide back because money for education is reduced. It moves the US towards becoming a third-world nation.

      (3) Sometimes the benefit of saving $0.20 at Walmart does not offset the loss of a job. If you do the math a little better it's easy to see that there are situations where you are worse off when moving jobs overseas. This isn't true of *all* jobs, just some of them. Instead of the argument of averages ("on average, moving jobs overseas is good"), you should be more particular and begin to ask the more nuanced question ("on average, moving jobs overseas is good, but there are cases when that is not true. Which jobs are those?")

    7. Re:The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Actually, no, I'm not wrong. Outsourcing is a balance of trade issue. If you outsource to India, you have to pay their salaries. This causes a flow of money from the U.S. to India. They acquire more money, we spend ours. If that continues, sooner or later they have more money than we do. This, of course, is assuming the balance of trade is otherwise zero. It's not; if I recall, the U.S.'s balance of trade is negative to begin with, so outsourcing merely accelerates the decline.

      I didn't intend to say anything about managers vs. workers; I was referring to the economy as a whole. I'm sorry you misunderstood.

      Also, I didn't say anything about the absolute standard of living, either -- I am not claiming that we'll end up living in mud huts or something. Rather, I'm only referring to the relative standard of living. It's much more likely that India's will get better than that ours would get worse. This is, of course, because outsourcing does increase efficiency, which increases total wealth -- it's not a zero sum game.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 1

      > Exactly. Some people, such as yourself, care
      > about the long term. Other people, such as
      > protectionists, care about the short term.

      My view is that the protectionists don't understand what it is that they preach. If they did, they wouldn't; and if they do understand, and they still preach, then they are putting their own *personal* self-interest ahead of the good of the nation and the people.

      What's agonizing about this is that so many people think that what's being done is right, and so support them! the selfish leading the blind.

      --
      Toby

    9. Re:The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 1

      A company has a given amount of money.

      It's goal is to spend this finite amount of money in the ways which maximize profit.

      Now, as you say, dealing with Indian IT support can be a PITA. But the company, by providing IT support in this way, has made a choice; it has saved money by deciding to provide lower quality IT support. The money saved is used elsewhere - spent on something which provides a greater return than it would have, had it been spent on providing better IT support.

      Now, you may object to lower quality IT support. But you don't, for example, object to the silent reduction in the prices of the services or goods offered by the company who's support you are using.

      You, personally, make a choice, considering all that you know about this company, and decide whether or not to use it's services, or the services of a competitor.

      Which one matters more to you?

      If IT support is a major issue for consumers, something which really matters, then money will tend to be spent on it, since it will really affect customer choices.

      However, if, say, the retail price of the services or goods has more effect, then money will be liberated from less important areas (such as IT support) and spent there, since it is more effective.

      Ideally, *everything* a company does would be of the highest quality.

      However, resources are finite and prioritization must occur. The free market is the best - and indeed, only viable - mechanism for allocating resources efficiently.

      --
      Toby

    10. Re:The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      they are putting their own *personal* self-interest ahead of the good of the nation and the people.
      Rational self-interest is the foundation of economics. Whether this is rational or not depends on the individual. For example, take Social Security -- old people support it, because it helps them; young people are against it, because it hurts them. I'm sure you're against it, since it hurts the nation as a whole. Does that mean you hate* old people for supporting it?

      *or some other weaker negative emotion
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:The fallacy of "sending jobs overseas" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...putting their own *personal* self-interest ahead of the good of..."

      Business people and politicians do this all the time.

      AC

  32. TCO by neomagi · · Score: 1

    a lot of small companies have been doing this for a long time. having lived in the midwest, california and most places in between, i tend to find that both the work ethic and quality of performance is higher in rural areas. of course there are always exception to this rule, such as IT. if you think about it, what else are folks in the midwest going to do during the summer, but go to work. no reason to call in sick to go hang out at the beech or go skiing.

    1. Re:TCO by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      f you think about it, what else are folks in the midwest going to do during the summer, but go to work. no reason to call in sick to go hang out at the beech or go skiing.

      You misspelled "winter" - the summers are actually not too bad.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  33. Farmsourcing by mszeto · · Score: 1

    I just saw a lecture about outsourcing in one of my grad courses, and the guest lecturer mentioned farmsourcing as a trend that was thought to be as cost effective as sending it overseas.

    Maybe they'll come up with a term for sending your company to Canada too! Northsourcing?

    1. Re:Farmsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sending work to Canada would be called "oot-sourcing," eh?

  34. Definite Selling Points by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've sold my company's services simply by pointing out that my rates (in Indiana) are much cheaper than similar firms in New York, California, or even nearby Chicago.

    You want to pay $150+ an hour for a Chicago guy to do the same thing that we'll do for $75 an hour?

    This can bite you when they find another firm offering $50/hour. At some point, it's just not cost effective to run a business that cheap... not to mention that you'll have a harder time finding qualified employees to work for so little.

    If I could make the salary of a comparable California worker, but live in Indiana, I'd be doing very well.

    1. Re:Definite Selling Points by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      This will definitely make it harder to find employees. Indiana business leaders are always bitching about what they call a "brain drain". Basically most graduates of Indiana University and Purdue end up leaving the state to find jobs. Some of them leave because there are no jobs in their field to be found in the state, and others like myself leave because the offers from Indiana companies are way way lower than those from Chicago based companies. The cost of living in the suburbs here is a little higher than Indianapolis, but the salaries are a night and day difference. Companies located in rural areas (yes, this includes Indy) are going to have to pay more if they want to ensure a good supply of employees once the job market bounces back. I don't think this will work out to be the slave labor corporate utopia that some people seem to think it will be.

    2. Re:Definite Selling Points by jdepons · · Score: 1

      I worked in rural wisconsin for 2 years, and honestly never met anybody smarter than myself! I think the talent pool is limited enough in rural amaerica that there isn't much to worry about. India on the other hand is a worry. I think it's worry sum because they can treat their workers like crap. If you base your company out of india, you do not have to abide by the same worker/human rights as companies do in the us. Businesses based in india can think "who cares if the workers all get cancer, we made a crap load of money." and there is nothing legaly wrong about it. jd

    3. Re:Definite Selling Points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could make the salary of a comparable California worker, but live in Indiana, I'd be doing very well.

      But in the end ... you'll still be living in Indiana. Having grown up there (outside of Lebanon, just NW of Indy) its a hellhole I don't even like flying over.

  35. decentralized outsourcing by man_ls · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see more businesses supporting work-from-home.

    Things like, call centers, could easily be distributed. VPN (or Internet)-based helpdesk app for support, paid per call handled. While you're "logged in", calls to the company PBX line for helpdesk are forwarded to a random selection of your phone numbers.

    With people being able to do their jobs with lower overhead (transportation costs, etc.) wages can be lower, meaning (1) more profit for corporation and (2) because less of the wage is tied up in overhead, higher useable income for the worker, despite having a lower absolute wage.

    1. Re:decentralized outsourcing by Kphrak · · Score: 1

      Things like, call centers, could easily be distributed. VPN (or Internet)-based helpdesk app for support, paid per call handled. While you're "logged in", calls to the company PBX line for helpdesk are forwarded to a random selection of your phone numbers.

      Won't work, for two reasons.

      1. Corporations don't trust the call center worker much farther than they can throw Mt. Everest, and therefore are afraid that (s)he might be screwing around at home instead of being busy. My place of work (not a call center) won't allow anyone but managers to work from home. My wife's call center did not allow employees to do anything when calls were not coming in. You couldn't read a magazine in slack hours, etc; you could only read the "official guidelines" (i.e. boring rules written in legalese). They're also randomly monitored -- "this call may be recorded for quality assurance".

      2. The home is often a noisy, unprofessional place. The dogs barking or birds squawking in the background, screaming kids, the dishwasher...the list goes on and on. In addition, most call center people are not "IT professionals". They're assembly-line workers -- they are trained to do a very specific job from a script, and if anything deviates from this pattern, they call a supervisor. This doesn't work too well if the worker is at home.

      3. Wages are already low enough. Call center workers are making absolute minimum wage, or maybe a couple dollars more than that, which invalidates any cost savings argument.

      It would be nice to have VPN play a greater part in work, but I doubt the call center mentality (the two I used in my examples are Livebridge and ACS, formerly CyberRep -- both in Portland, OR) is geared to handle this. Livebridge, in particular, is little different from a slave camp, and should be avoided at all costs.

      --

      There's no sig like this sig anywhere near this sig, so this must be the sig.
  36. It has already been done. by fsandford · · Score: 0

    Me thinks Wal-Mart has already capitalized on this theory.

  37. Creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Creative Labs, while they have outsourced overseas their development labs, their tech support is in a tiny town called Stillwater, Oklahoma. They pay their employees only slightly above minimum wage. So, rural outsourcing probably saved them quite a bit of money.

    1. Re:Creative by crow23 · · Score: 1

      Stillwater is exactly backwoods. It's home to a fairly http://www.okstate.edu/large state university and supposedly has one of the highest rates of PhDs in the nation because of the university. I think this Rural Source is looking to even smaller towns.

  38. Ob Troll by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe it wasn't a good idea to do this with that ballot-counting contract...

    I keed!

  39. Wow by robyannetta · · Score: 2, Funny
    An actual attempt to keep jobs in America. Oh shit, chest pain...!!

    &$#%^% NO CARRIER

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  40. Could be a good idea by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've considered opening a call center in my hometown in Indiana on a number of occassions. It just makes more sense than sending the jobs to India.

  41. I done did it to myself by g0hare · · Score: 1

    I live in a good-size college town with major growing pains (traffic), I commute OUT of it into the sticks every day. It's the same 45 minutes on the road, but instead of being stuck in a traffic jam 45 minutes to go 8 miles, I drive nonstop on two-lane highways through farm country. I get great bennies and flex, I'm home to see my kids, although the pay isn't great it's been worth it so far.

    --
    Vote Quimby!
  42. Re: minds me of a joke by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

    After getting nailed by a Daisy Cutter, Osama made his way to the pearly gates. There, he is greeted by George Washington. "How dare you attack the nation I helped conceive!" yells Mr. Washington, slapping Osama in the face.

    Patrick Henry comes up from behind. "You wanted to end the Americans' liberty, so they gave you death!" Henry punches Osama on the nose.

    James Madison comes up next, and says "This is why I allowed the Federal government to provide for the common defense!" He drops a large weight on Osama's knee.

    Osama is subject to similar beatings from John Randolph of Roanoke, James Monroe, and 65 other people who have the same love for liberty and America.

    As he writhes on the ground, Thomas Jefferson picks him up to hurl him back toward the gate where he is to be judged.

    As Osama awaits his journey to his final very hot destination, he screams "This is not what I was promised!"

    An angel replies "I told you there would be 72 Virginians waiting for you, idiot. What did you think I said?"

    --

    - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  43. Something tells me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They must have rural sourced that website, with its obviously dithered gifs, imagemaps, and lame stock photography.

  44. Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is just something else for the Liberals to complain about.

    "You can't outsource to rural areas!! What about the poor urban areas that need the money."

    I can see it already...

  45. Another two cents... by robyannetta · · Score: 2, Funny

    What would Brian Boitano do?

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  46. Old news... by mikeylebeau · · Score: 1

    Hasn't this been done for a long time? I used to work for PayPal and they had the majority of their non-technical work done in Omaha.

  47. Why not? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
    And for all y'all "Oh, but I could never live in rural America. It's so boring! There's nothing to do! No culture out there..." types.

    Silicon Valley or Silicon Alley: Get paid $80K, pay 28% federal tax plus 9-10% state/city tax. House costs $500K-$1M.

    East Buttfuck, Wyoming: Get paid $50K. Pay 25% federal tax plus 0.0% state tax. House costs $60K-$100K.

    If you've saved enough money for a down payment in the People's Republic of Kalifornia, you can buy a house for cash in rural America. And if you've been there long enough that you actually own your house in the People's Republic of Kalifornia, you can sell it, buy a house and a Ferrari, and have change left over for a fucking Porsche in rural America. That's right.

    Wanna visit the opera? Hop in the Ferrari on Friday after work, tear up the asphalt (long live long straight highways featuring speed limits defined only by the words "reasonable and prudent" -- it's like the American Autobahn!), party your ass off all weekend, and come home on Sunday.

    One look at the horrible things he's done to a Ferrari should make any self-respecting geek aspire to make John Romero our bitch. The best part about rural America isn't that a middle-class IT geek can enjoy such a lifestyle -- it's that he or she can pay for it on the interest and tax savings alone.

    Who is John Galt? When you leave a high-tax state for rural America, you are.

    1. Re:Why not? by Kenja · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "If you've saved enough money for a down payment in the People's Republic of Kalifornia, you can buy a house for cash in rural America."

      But then you'd own a house in rural America. There is a reason they cost less, fewer people want them. Simple economics.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Why not? by multimed · · Score: 1

      True. But do you buy a house to sell it or do you buy a house for shelter, confort and even enjoyment.

      --
      Vote Quimby.
    3. Re:Why not? by Kenja · · Score: 1
      "True. But do you buy a house to sell it or do you buy a house for shelter, confort and even enjoyment."

      The later, thats why I wont buy a house thats not in a costal state. My brain needs culture and my mouth needs sea food.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard the standard of living is even lower in West Buttfuck.

    5. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear you there. That's why I own a home just a few miles inland in New Hampshire. Access to the seacoast, seafood, Boston, multiple states. It's about the best place I can imagine to be. Of course you gotta PAY for it. That's the only downfall.

    6. Re:Why not? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that you get to drive a million fucking miles every time you need to go to the store. Plus, the stores in rural places don't carry anything, so you have to do all your shopping by catalog. Oh, and if you want that Ferrari there is no dealer to buy it from or get it serviced at. Hey, you'd be doing good to even find a place to get a volkwagen serviced in most rural areas.

      And you get to have uneducated bumkins for neighbors who leave non-running cars on blocks in the front lawn.

      Where can I sign up? (Not!)

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    7. Re:Why not? by cduffy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a middle way, too.

      Austin, Texas: Get paid $55K (if you could find a $50K job in East Buttfuck). Pay 25% federal tax plus 0.0% state tax. House costs $100K-$250K.

      It's still a huge improvement over thte PRK financially, and you still get to live somewhere with interesting people (who aren't rednecks or rabid Bush supporters) and interesting things to do.

      Plus, by moving here, you're increasing land values, and making my ($120K) house worth more. So everybody wins! :)

    8. Re:Why not? by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      "Plus, the stores in rural places don't carry anything, so you have to do all your shopping by catalog."

      City stores aren't much better. There's nothing like an extreme lack of space to hamper selection. I live in Washington DC, where we have one Best Buy and one Kmart. Just about every other store in town in some sort of specialty shoppe with a poor selection and high prices. The only notable exceptions are the usually clothing chains and a wealth of huge bookstores. I do the majority of my shopping via the web or trips to VA/MD because when I need specialty electronics, video games that aren't AAA titles, or clothes that don't cost way too much to beat up, I just can't get that stuff in the city.

    9. Re:Why not? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      The stores you are talking about in VA/MD are still considered part of the DC "metro area". If you really lived in a rural area (like rural Oklahoma), those resources wouldn't be available at all.

      Where I lived, it was multiple hours drive just to get to any store that sold shirts that weren't T-shirts or western shirts (an example). There was *no* store in town that sold electronics more complicated than a flashlight. My parents still live there. They do not have broadband internet available at all. Cable TV is not available. There is no cell phone coverage there. There is only 1 ISP that is not a long distance call which is over 50$ per month. It is owned by an indian tribe and is very unreliable. You can only view 2 TV stations via over the air broadcasting. There is no PBS station and no NPR station. So, if you're living there you'd better like right wing talk radio and country music because that is the only programming available except for religious programming.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    10. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Not to mention the fact that you get to drive a million fucking miles every time you need to go to the store.

      When you have a Ferrari, a million fucking miles of driving (on twisty two-lane blacktop without another soul in sight for 20 miles in front of you or behind you) is a feature, not a bug!

    11. Re:Why not? by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      Yes, but where is the *friggin* broadband??? I *need* broadband. I can't *get* broadband in rural America, even if there's an OC-13 in my frickin' backyard.

      I don't care that it's cheaper to live there. I care that I need a phat pipe to telecommute and to order stuff I can't get in East Buttfuck. And, no, I will not shop at Wal-Mart.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  48. Another Example of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting lucky in Kentucky!

  49. CNN Headline News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I know where Timothy gets his text for the posts from! He just copies the ticker on the bottom of CNN headline news!

  50. New Mexico by donbrock · · Score: 0
    Rural Sourcing's president, has set up two facilities in Arkansas, has another center coming on line in New Mexico in January, and is in talks to open yet another facility in North Carolina.

    YeeHaw! I'm going back home to New Mexico.

  51. Re:Rural America? by strict3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, land of the fundamentalist Christians. They all used to be Democrats!

    Yes, it's true, they used to be democrats, 40 or 50 years ago. But now that the Dems make their left wing social platform such a large part of their platform, they're becoming republicans.
    They're tired of hearing that America sucks and that people who still hold onto the idea of morals and values are a bunch of bigoted idiots.

    People who mock those in rural areas really need to get an f'en clue. Most of the idiots on the coasts have hardly been outside their metro areas, and when they do leave it's just to go to some other city. The people you mock are the most honest, real, hard working people in this country.

    --
    "If a frog had side pockets, he'd carry a hand gun" - Dan Rather
  52. Already Happening by Qwest94 · · Score: 1

    A large multinational law firm has "outsourced" many of its backoffice functions to West Virginia.

    http://www.news-register.net/business/story/102020 2004_biz01.asp

    --
    --Spooky Action At A Distance
  53. Wonderful! by gabbarbhai · · Score: 1

    Despite being an (East) Indian, I'd welcome this if it helps change the mindsets of the so called 'red states' a bit..

  54. I'd welcome this in my town by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I live in a small town of about 600 people. A small shop like this (even just 10 workers and a single support person) would make a big positive difference in our local economy.

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  55. This is also known as ... by FlunkedFlank · · Score: 1

    ... "Red State Outsourcing"

  56. qualification questionare by Vague+but+True · · Score: 1
    Here's a list of qualifications for the new position in hickville.

    1. Do you own a gun?
    1a. How many do you own.
    2. Do you drive a pick-up truck or a camero?
    2a. Is the primary color Bondo?
    3. Do you have more than 3 teeth?
    3a. In your mouth?
    4. Do you recognize the first day of deer-season as a holiday?
    4a. And duck-season?
    5. Are you married to a close relative?
    5a. Do you wish you were married to a close relative?

    Yes, I'm from the country. No, not all of these apply to me

    --

    I'm not a doctor, but I play one in bed.

    1. Re:qualification questionare by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      1. yes
      a1. 17
      2. both
      2a. heck no.
      3. all of them
      3a. yes
      4. yes
      4a. no
      5. no
      5a. no

      and yes, I'm from Mississippi.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
  57. Re:English, no, 'stralian. by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

    Largely agree. I'm in rural Australia, working for a manuf/export agribusiness with $500m ann turnover. Our IT dept is in transition to being outsourced - to a company comprising recent ex-employees. (We get made redundant on the back of a contract to supply..)

    Much of what we do couldn't be sent elsewhere just because you have to know the local situations, and there's not enough work in any single project that offshoring economies would overcome the overheads. That said, we occasionally subcontract devt to people we've previously dealt with, where-ever they are at the time. (one was in England for a while)

    In the meantime, my house and yard cost 20% of what it would in the nearest capitol city, I see many trees out my window, and our town does have pizza deliveries :-)

    --
    -- All your bass are below two Hz
  58. Hmm.... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    *looks to the right, sees trees and a two-lane highway*

    *looks to the left, sees trees and a creek*

    Go ahead, bring the jobs out here!

  59. Canada, eh? by BadMrMojo · · Score: 1
  60. It's not delivery by tepples · · Score: 1

    But will they be able to survive without pizza deliveries?

    If you have a freezer and a standard oven, you can cook a pizzeria-quality pizza in about the same amount of time it takes to get one delivered. It's not delivery; it's Wal-Mart Great Value.

    1. Re:It's not delivery by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      um, it takes 8:30 to cook a pizza at 410f. It takes 30:00+ to deliver it... Yes, I worked for a Papa Johns for a few years. Where? Ridgeland Mississippi. We've got everything you have in the big cities other than smog, subways, and crime. Plus trees and wildlife...

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
  61. Face the facts! by asliarun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Face the facts. If you say that India is a outsourcing success story, look at the reasons why. On average, goods in India, barring housing and cars, cost only 20% (or less) of what it costs here in USA. On top of it, the standards of a good life and luxury are far lower than in the US.

    In California, you call yourself middle-class if you have a 0.5 mil house, a boat, 2 cars etc. In India, most middle class folks consider a car with a boot as a luxury car (i'm not joking, Hyundai Accent, Ford Ikon, Fiat Siena etc. are considered high-end luxury cars). Even a person driving a small hatch-back considers himself/herself as having acheived something. This is why the big multinationals can afford to pay 10% of what they pay in the US, and still manage to retain a happy workforce!

    Add to that, an abundance of intelligent, hard-working, English speaking people, extremely willing to slog for 12 hours a day so that they can save enough over 3-5 years to afford a Maruti Suzuki 800 (yes, it's a ~780 cc car), who can compete with that? Yes, there's still issues, such as infrastructure, accents, timezone differences, etc. and lots of bad apples in the workforce too, but it still doesnt overpower the cost advantage.

    It's a bit like how the x86 architecture took over the computer world. People assumed initially, and rightly too, that x86 was inefficient and too cheap. What they didn't count on was that as x86 sold more and more, it also innovated and improved, and very soon, offered a double-whammy cost AND performance advantage over the other proprietary systems. Again, people pad up the costs by factoring communication cost, travel cost etc. What they don't realize is that these costs are firstly, marginal, and secondly, reducing over time.

    The cost of living in the midwest or in rural America might be somewhat less than the metros or the coasts, but it cannot compete with the cost advantage offered by countries like India, Taiwan, China etc.

    IMHO, rural america can compete effectively with other IT companies. Only, they need to sing a different song. They have to be flexible and play on their natural strengths and not on their weaknesses. For example, if a lot of techies in the small towns and villages got together, formed a virtual company or organization, and offered standardized software solutions to local businesses and institutions, there is NO way that the big city businesses or another country could compete with them. Don't compete on cost, compete on value.

    1. Re:Face the facts! by MSBob · · Score: 1
      The fact that you mention Taiwan in the same breath as India or China is quite interesting. You realize that Taiwan has a higher per capita GDP than most EU countries and a purchasing power parity about equal with that of the United Kingdom?

      Mentioning Taiwan as a source of cheap labour makes it sound like you know very little about this particular subject and you are simply making stuff up.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    2. Re:Face the facts! by asliarun · · Score: 1

      Ok, i was wrong about Taiwan. However, you're extrapolating this one incorrect fact to say that i know very little about this subject? I guess that ad hominem tu quoque type of negations are just too easily made. I was speaking on generalities here, not picking nits as you're doing. I'm also not claiming to be a macro-economic expert. However, i still stand by the basic point of my argument that rural america should compete on factors other than cost, because cost is simply NOT their primary strength.

    3. Re:Face the facts! by asliarun · · Score: 2, Informative

      1/5 = 20%. Are you saying something different?

      I agree that i was not entirely accurate in my figures. I do know that a person in India can have a decent meal in an average restaurant for about Rs. 50 (~$1), can buy a coke for Rs. 10 (20 cents), can buy decent shirts and trousers for about Rs. 500 each ($10). Yes, these figures vary according to quality, location, brand, etc. but it's still way cheaper than in the USA. For example, a movie ticket in a good theater costs about Rs. 50 - Rs. 100. That's $1-$2!

      Yes, certain things are expensive, like white goods for example. However, even these items are becoming cheaper, and not more expensive. Another thing is that the aspiration level is also much lower in India. A 25" TV is considered as an expensive, with 21" being status quo. Plasma and LCD is only affordable for politicians and government servants who take bribes.

    4. Re:Face the facts! by militiaMan · · Score: 0

      Sorry. What was I thinking.

  62. I worked in Watauga Texas by netsavior · · Score: 1

    In a mini-mall writing code... we just sold the software for a couple million... I guess rural sourcing works

    1. Re:I worked in Watauga Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like watauga is rural.... I grew up there and sure there are no skyscrapers but it is north ft worth metro-mess :P

  63. The difference between India and rural US... by aquarian · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In India, we get that country's best and brightest doing our tech support -- the equivalent of our best universities' students, looking not only for good jobs, but hands-on experience with users for a future career in IT.

    But in the US, we wind up with the dregs of society. I'm sorry to say it, but it's true. Our best and brightest do not need to take tech support jobs, nor do they remain in places like rural Mississippi.

    So if you're wondering where those errors on your credit report come from, originating from typos and common misspellings...

    1. Re:The difference between India and rural US... by cmowire · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, that's not necessarily the case.

      The thing to remember is that the best-and-brightest of India -- the IIT grads -- do not stay in India, most of them are able to grab green cards and work for even more in the US than they could in India.

      The current outsourcing population in India is the second tier. Which is still pretty decent, but there's a limited supply of them and eventually they will price themselves out of the market.

      The problem in India is that there's no good third tier. You either have at least bachleurs degree and probably a masters degree, or you are almost illiterate. This isn't any sort of bell-curve intellectual gap, it's mostly that the public pre-college education in India is awful. And there's a lot of waste there -- kids who might become great thinkers but because they are culturally expected to be lower class, they are. I used to think that a good way to disrupt the social order there would be to educate the poor, but it's a much more complicated problem than that.

      In the US, at least you still have a good population of folks to send to community college.

    2. Re:The difference between India and rural US... by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Our best and brightest do not need to take tech support jobs, nor do they remain in places like rural Mississippi.

      Given the opportunity, I'm sure that you'll find some that would like to stay in Mississippi (or Iowa!). Is the problem of them leaving the rurual areas the desire to move to the city (for some it is) or a lack of opportunity for them (for almost all this would be the case)?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    3. Re:The difference between India and rural US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, at least you still have a good population of folks to send to community college.

      It's sounds to me like you're dissing community college. I've taken classes at one before, and have been at a major university for 3 years now, and I can say that in some cases the quality at the community college was far better than this particular university. Also I spent time in a few different small rural schools, and finished high school at a large suburban high school, in my experience the rural education was far beyond the quality of the city public schools.

      I really don't think university life is for everyone, the trade schools and community colleges fill an important gap IMO, not to mention that the community colleges are often in touch with the local business community and offer courses which will help the locals develop skills which the businesses in their area think are important.

    4. Re:The difference between India and rural US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any facts/studies to back up your claim about the third tier not existing?
      In the absence of any studies i would think the ratios are pretty much same as America's. I have heard that actually the schooling system in India is much more competetive/competent than the US. And the simple fact is there are 3 times as many Indians as Americans.
      Bottomline, the India factor will now always be there, barring major surprises

    5. Re:The difference between India and rural US... by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      You're right, but keep in mind that simply because of their *huge* population even a small improvement in education/living standards can have a huge impact in absolute numbes. It's like what is going on in China right now; only a relatively small percentage of the population can consume on a level even approaching Western terms, but the collecive size of the market just grows at an insane rate because there's over a billion people! Don't get me wrong, it will definitely be quite a while yet before India can draw from a labour pool -- or China boast a consumer market -- comparable that of the US, but the day will come.

  64. ready to leave the valley by mpechner · · Score: 1

    Setup somewhere with more pleasant weather than the south and you'll get people willing to leave the SF Bay area.

    Look into the Seattle Area.

    We just want:

    • Fair pay. i.e paid enough to afford a house.
    • Fair work. No sweat shops.
    • Interesting work. Why waste talent on mudane tasks.

    I live in the SF Bay area because of the variety of work I get to do. I'm willing to leave and even earn less if I can buy a house and not live paycheck to paycheck.

    1. Re:ready to leave the valley by cduffy · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to leave and even earn less if I can buy a house and not live paycheck to paycheck.

      I've said this before: Considered Austin, TX?

      "Paid enough to afford a house" is damn little here. I just bought one, and the cash component of my pay (at the startup [yup, interesting work] that I'm at) is just 4000 more than a year's rent (alone, no other expenses) cost there.

  65. Southern Techies... by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 1

    You mean tech support that speaks broken English with a thick accent, or tech support that talk down right suthurn.
    Seriously though, I've met plenty of highly skilled technical people who sound like traditional "rednecks". As strange as that sounds. Television has given everyone the impression that if you have a southern accent, you're the classic redneck hick that prizes his bass boat more than his family and home. "Saw that tornadee' We culd'a been kilt or even worse, lost our satee'lite dish." Every culture and part of the country have them, it's just that the news crews in the southeast love to find these people to interview after a natural disaster. Really, can you hold it against them, they're funny!
    I'm from Alabama, don't get offended.

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  66. Pundits by Sai+Babu · · Score: 1

    Were telling us how wonderful telecommuting would be.
    How could the wise futurists fails to see that:
    If you can do your job form anywhere, so can anyone else!

  67. Not so good idea as one would think... by slimyrubber · · Score: 1

    Sure there will be increase in jobs in those rural areas.. but wouldnt the standard of living drop reasonably too? For businesses to move small jobs to rural areas it has to cost as low as moving them to india or other developing countries. The wages they give against the amount of work is incredibly low. I cant see how this is a positive step for local economy.

    Plus I'hd rather have india take all those jobs. Everyone needs a chance to grow and taking away already established jobs from india is a severe backlash to its economy.

    --
    [ I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance ] -- Isaac Asimov
  68. Outsource to the trailer park boys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Low overhead!

  69. Re:Rural America? by skadork · · Score: 0

    Damn straight.

    Hank Williams will kick Fred Durst's, marilyn mansons, eminem's, and tupac's ass any day of the week.

    less government, more guns.

    --
    doug
    -a.thought.crushed.my.mind-
  70. Re:Rural America? by HiThere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've lived in rural and I've lived in cities. I prefer cities. Rural people do, indeed, *tend* to be honest and real hard working. There are good reasons for this. They also tend to be bigoted and intolerant of strangers. (And there are good reasons for this.)

    City people *tend* to be different along those axii, and there are reasons for that. Good, logical reasons. (Like they encounter new people and ideas more frequently.)

    I like and admire honesty. I try to be honest. This doesn't cause me to admire bigotry. And I find bigotry too high a price to pay for achieving honesty. (Also an unnecessary price.)

    As for hard working...people who are desperate will work themselves to death. That's no moral good. People who are working for themselves will work quite hard for years on end. That may or may not be a moral good, but it's also enlightened self interest. People who are being taken advantage of will slack off whenever the slave master isn't looking. And I consider THIS to be a moral good.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  71. Re:Rural America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank God you said it!!!!

  72. OT: Manhattan... by maynard · · Score: 1

    ...Rocks! But it's too intense for me to want to live there 24/7. The crazy cost of living and tiny apartments I can accept, the amazing diversity of arts, entertainment and restaurants I could gush over till the sun goes nova, but the constant noise and adrenalin rush would leave me a grey-haired empty shell of a man within only a few years. I'll take nice slow Boston, thanks. *Phew!* :) --M

  73. Good This is the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to get the democrats in the the white house. Let all the democrats techies move to rural America and watch that map turn Blue.

  74. Needs catsup by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

    ballot-COUNTING contract?!? I thought you said a ballot-EATING contract!!

    Mmmmm...tastes like Democracy...

  75. Two Cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is trying to make it legal to work your employees into the fucking ground, in order to cut down on their breeding (people are less likely to have the energy to breed when they've pulled a 18 hour work day). Give it another 4 years. It'll be better to outsource to Montana, because you can still prosecute them (using American law) for corporate espionage.

    On this very same topic, didn't france have some kind of fucking revolution or something, because of this very situation? Best of times, age of reason, or some shit like that...

  76. Rural moving... by achacha · · Score: 1

    Lots of companies do this already. They set up large headquarters in some far rural area that is maybe few hours away from the main office and keep all the non-business people there. If need be they can always drive/train to the main office. It makes sense, and many people working for the rural office tend to migrate to rural areas and actually afford buying a house which is really tough if you are in a metropolis or a high density area.

    Pay may be less, but so is the cost of living.

  77. red states? by sPaKr · · Score: 0, Troll

    the inhabinates in the Red States might not be the brights and easily controlled via fear and religion. But can we really expect them to live on pennies on the dollar? When shopping at WalMart is shopping at the ritzy store I doubt it a community will be built in that cost/price/wage structor.

  78. inconvenience by BigGar' · · Score: 1

    Rural Sourcing's fees are about the same as the overall cost of using an Indian outsourcer, she said--if you consider factors such as communication costs, travel expenses and inconvenience.

    I wonder if that's anything like the inconvenience of being out of a job?

    --


    Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
  79. Call Centers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has already been happening for years, the company I work for has customer call centers across the country. Originall they were near their corporate sites, in Chicago & New York. They began opening more to handle the call volume and opened two more in Oklahoma and Nebraska. It did not take too long for upper management to decide to shutdown the Chicago and New York sites when they saw the new sites were cheaper to staff.

    Why pay people $12 an hour in Chicago to answer phones when people will do it for $7 an hour elsewhere in the country?

  80. Amarillo has good friendly tech folks. by StormyWeather · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My two passions are literature and IT. I also live in Amarillo, TX. I know it is fun to bash on midwest/southern people for being ignorant, but I feel it is that the south has always been more agriculture based than the North due to the longer growing season etc. When I was growing up I worked on a ranch throwing hay, mucking stalls, branding cattle, and doctoring animals. This obviously put me at a bit of a disadvantage skill wise from kids that worked at their dads office, but I believe I have a better work ethic than most of those folks because I know what I could be doing instead.

    I challenge anyone in the country to call Amarillo people and not be able to understand what they are saying. In fact the most annoying thing I have heard about our accents in Texas is that we talk slower. Our tech support department where I work is one of the finest I have ever seen because of this. If you are trying to describe something then speaking slowly (no matter how annoying it is) is better than rattling off something so fast the person on the other end of the phone can't jot it down.

  81. Jobs to the Red States! w00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, let's send jobs requiring education and intelligence to the ignorant, selfish, materialistic, bigoted dumbasses to voted for Bush.

  82. I live there and I do IT already by GweeDo · · Score: 1

    I know this might be hard to believe but I live in a town of 2000 people and work as a Sys Admin/DBA for a company here (in Plainville, KS). We aren't a bunch of "hicks"). I don't speak like a readneck like many posts have already implied and I don't feel like I make turd for salary (put cost of living into effect and I make more than YOU!). So, please people don't be idiots and assume we are all what the movies make us out to be.

  83. Better window views? by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

    Like, say, San Francisco? Oh, wait...

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    1. Re:Better window views? by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Same view, same price. I was thinking of any town (heck - any small city) where you can look out and see a tree or grass. Maybe a small pond.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:Better window views? by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      Better view, IMHO, but I'm partial to Mt. Tam and the coast around Bolinas.

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    3. Re:Better window views? by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      To each his own. I like walking to work and being able to see stars at night.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    4. Re:Better window views? by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      It does happen here, just not often. I recall one sparkling clear night in Mill Valley where there were so many stars, it was more like being in the high mountains.

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    5. Re:Better window views? by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      It's amazing how many stars that there are if you get away from city lights.

      I live in a (very) small town and can see stars at night. My folks live 1 mile away (outside of town), and it's astounding how many more stars can be seen there than at my house.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  84. Foghorn Leghorn Google Translator? by robdeadtech · · Score: 1

    What we need is a Foghorn Leghorn proxy! Too bad there isn't a Google Translator...

    --
    Heil Sig! -Rob
  85. Which one speaks english? by thundergeek · · Score: 1

    So instead of trying to explain your problem to a guy who can't speak or read english, your gonna have to explain your problemto a guy who can't speak or read english?

    Hmm, makes no sense. But I see why it would be cost effective.

  86. rural has one syllable too many by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1

    I'd really prefer they call this "sidesourcing" as it keeps with the theme and has a more general implication.

  87. Great.... by frizzr · · Score: 1

    Being from rural Arkansas originally, I think it is ironic that I intentionally went into a field that I knew would require me to move to a large(r) city, and now....

    I just hope I can remember the two or three Brooks and Dunn songs that I learned by heart while there.

  88. Re:What's the big deal? by symbolic · · Score: 1


    I thought it was common knowledge that rural America is the hotbed of education and intellectual acuity needed for today's technology.

    Joking aside, if Sun and Microsoft keep up their push for "graphic programmers" (ala the 'visual' stuff), anyone with a brain can draw boxes and connect the dots.

    Next up: Medicine.

  89. Edumaction by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    I thought the reason outsourcing went to India was that they had high educational standards.

    For example, they don't get taught that dinosaur fossils are actually demon bones or that the world began about 10,000 years ago (both real beliefs in many fundie communities).

    "Yeah, I was surfing and my computer locked up."
    "Lemme see. Well, 'cording to our records you are a heathen. The Lord has seized up your browser."
    "What?"
    "Get down on your knees and beg forgiveness from the Lord and if your heart is true your IP shall be restored! Pray! Pray for all you're worth, boy!"

    Actually, I think it's a good idea, if somewhat revealing. Congratulations, parts of America are now ALMOST as low wage as third world countries. Mission Accomplished.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  90. This is why Bush won. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While waving your position papers and lecturing Americans that they'll just have to accept outsourcing, you Democrats lost Billy Bob.

    Better luck next time. Losers.

  91. Why not Appalachia?? by adachan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a topic which has been brought up on /. before, however, I think it is important as the US dollar is currently tanking. I always hear about sending jobs to China and India, but really, why not West Virginia.

    I am orignially from a medium town in WV. It is rather poor, but there is a University , we have highways and a small airport. Columbus, Cincinatti, Lexington, Pittsburgh, and a number or cities in North Carolina are not that far away.

    We have all the same stores in the Mall that bigger cities do, and we can get stuff shipped from newegg.com just as fast as anyone else. There are virtually NO taxes and the air is relatively clean. There is a low crime rate, you can build a mansion for the same price as a shack in larger cities, and you can camp in your back yard (literally depending on where you live). The water tastes good out of the faucet, the education system is decent (low numbers of students per teacher as well). You can even invest your money in the same stock market as people in larger metropolitian areas if you are so inclined.

    Sure you will make less money per hour, but who cares....In the end you will have more. I say tax the shit out of companies that outsource to other countries and even better make them pay American minimum wages to workers there. After all they are working for an American company, dont they deserve to make at least an American wage?

  92. Happy Medium by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

    Another thing to realize is that there aren't just two choices: Extreme Urban or Hick Town.

    I live in Huntsville, Alabama which has a thriving high tech industry and it is a medium sized southern town with lots of suburbs and few big city amenities: nice restaurants, sports (albeit minor league), colleges, a symphony, an opera company, a nice art gallery, a club scene (albeit not a great one), libraries, book stores, etc. We also have very little traffic, nice neighborhoods, good schools, cheap houses, and low property taxes. Broadband internet is available from 2 or 3 different sources anywhere in the city.

    If you want to live "in the country", you can buy a 100 acre farm within about a 20 minute commute to any business in the city. Or you can buy a 3000 square foot house on a nice treed lot for around $200K (or less).

    --
    -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  93. Re:Rural America? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
    But now that the Dems make their left wing social platform such a large part of their platform, they're becoming republicans.
    Huh? I was under the impression that Republicans were supposed to be against social programs.
    ...people who still hold onto the idea of morals and values are a bunch of bigoted idiots.
    I didn't say they were bigoted, or idiots. Apparently you're the one who has a problem with fundamentalist Christians.

    That said, I do believe they have a difficulty in separating morality from religion. Even atheists can be moral. More importantly, the Goverment is certainly allowed (and required) to legislate morality, but prohibited from legislating religion. For example, the issue of gay marriage is really two issues: "should homosexuals be allowed to marry," which is a religious issue and should be left solely to churches (and other religious institutions), and "should homosexuals be allowed to enter into a civil union," which is a moral issue and relevant to Government regulation (since it concerns filing taxes jointly and such).
    The people you mock are the most honest, real, hard working people in this country.
    Number one, I did no such thing! Number two, I don't live in a city. I live in Georgia (in case you didn't know, that qualifies as "Deep South"). I see exactly how honest, real, and hard working rural people are. It's actually no more, and no less, than the people in cities. Incidentally, the Mexican immigrants that Georgia has been inundated with are, in my experience, usually more hard working than either rural or urban white southerners.
    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  94. Deja Vu by fupeg · · Score: 1

    Haven't I been talking about this for a long time? This could be a great thing, if it is sustainable. The key is there being enough technically skilled people in middle America. Working with colleges could work. It will be interesting to see. If there is a good enough supply of skilled workers in these areas, then the economics will do the rest. The only problem could be keeping people in these areas. Just as jobs might flow there, the skilled workers might flow to places that pay better. Nonetheless, having more educated, skilled people in middle America could be a really good thing.

  95. "Outsourcing" always sucks for someone by hellfire · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Now, I'm not going to put up a big fuss about the advantages and disadvantages of any kind of outsourcing, whether you source jobs from india or Tennessee. But I will take exception to several posts here praising the idea of moving to some rural area and getting away from the city.

    I'm not following anyone anywhere damnit. I like where I live. My family likes where they live, and damn a CEO to hell if he doesn't have some small sense of true guilt at the pain he would cause my family if we had to move.

    Mothers and fathers don't always work at the same company, so if you move one parent, the other must follow, or the first one must quit and find a new position. And kids establish a lot of bonds in the school they go to, and uprooting most kids like that is emotionally distressful, no matter how trivial such things are to adults.

    The problem with "outsourcing" is that it's done for only one reason, to cut costs. Sometimes that's good, and sometimes that's bad. And sometimes it hurts people, and sometime's it doesn't. Change always hurts, but let's get some balance and empathy here in the posts.

    Everyone's so excited about this, but this scares me just as much as outsourcing to india. In fact it scares me more, because it's even more tempting and easy for small companies to take advantage of. I don't want to move to the deep south, I hate it there, and I'm presently very pissed at southerners for handing the election to Bush. I'll stay right where I am thank you.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:"Outsourcing" always sucks for someone by Cheirdal · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why would someone give his post a troll modifier? He posted very legitimate concerns about having to move. Who ever handed out the troll modifier is the real troll here. I don't agree with his comments that rural insourcing is a greater threat to America than Indian outsourcing is (I think India outsourcing is a huge threat to the American economy). So on here if someone doesn't agree with your ideas you get a troll modifier?

  96. Speaking from experience... by BRSQUIRRL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I worked at a development shop in Little Rock, Arkansas for a couple of years before getting married and moving to a very large U.S. city (I think it is #4 currently) when my wife was accepted to medical school here, so I think I'm qualified to do a bit of comparison.

    I think that there are a lot of cities in the U.S. in the 100,000 - 200,000 population range that people don't really consider for whatever reason, either as places to live or for corporations. Little Rock, for example, had most of the shopping, dining, etc. of a larger city but without nearly as much pollution and traffic and with a lower cost of living to boot. To respond specifically to some of the comments I've seen in this thread so far: we had Starbucks, pizza delivery, clubs/raves (if that is your thing), a symphony orchestra, and a minor league baseball team (the only thing that I would miss if I moved back would be the professional sports).

    I think there is rural, as in one gas station, one stoplight, and a Sonic...and then there is "rural", as in "not one of the 50 largest cities in the US", and I think businesses would do well to look more closely at the latter.

    1. Re:Speaking from experience... by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      Why only consider small (100,000 - 200,000) sized cities in rural states?
      Here are profiles of the fifty largest cities, which vary in size from 350,000 to 8,000,000. I was going to attempt to pick out the cities which might be considered to be inexpensive and located in rural states; I realized that this was very subjective and just provide the complete list:
      Albuquerque, N.M., Atlanta, Ga., Austin, Tex., Baltimore, Md., Boston, Mass., Charlotte, N.C., Chicago, Ill., Cleveland, Ohio, Colorado Springs, Colo., Columbus, Ohio, Dallas, Tex., Denver, Colo., Detroit, Mich., El Paso, Tex., Fort Worth, Tex., Fresno, Calif., Honolulu, Hawaii, Houston, Tex., Indianapolis, Ind., Jacksonville, Fla., Kansas City, Mo., Las Vegas, Nev., Long Beach, Calif., Los Angeles, Calif., Memphis, Tenn., Mesa, Ariz., Miami, Fla., Milwaukee, Wis., Minneapolis, Minn., Nashville-Davidson, Tenn., New Orleans, La., New York, N.Y., Oakland, Calif., Oklahoma City, Okla., Omaha, Neb., Philadelphia, Pa., Phoenix, Ariz., Portland, Ore., Sacramento, Calif., St. Louis, Mo., San Antonio, Tex., San Diego, Calif., San Francisco, Calif., San Jose, Calif., Seattle, Wash., Tucson, Ariz., Tulsa, Okla., Virginia Beach, Va., Washington, DC, and Wichita, Kans. .

      For many of these cities, housing prices are reduced because rural land is available nearby and more housing can easily be added. (Try that in Seattle.) All (almost all?) of these cities have a national or international airport nearby. These advantages means workers can live well on lower salaries and companies can conduct business conveniently and inexpensively.

    2. Re:Speaking from experience... by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      You know, you finally made me curious enough. I keep seeing Sonic commercials and wondering where the hell they are. These must be national spots.

      I live in Massachusetts. The closest sonic is in either Virginia or Ohio.

      Apparently, the whole Northeast is either too urban or too rural for a Sonic? :\

  97. Re:Hacking in the heartland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Morland, KS and I will say KC is expensive, not modest. $220 a month fetches a two bedroom house with an office, full kitchen, dining and living room along with a two car garage. Oh yeah, the landlord mows the lawn.

    And so everyone knows, they actually send newscasters to Kansas to learn to speak from us, apparently our accent is neutral (some people say "no accent" but that's impossible).

  98. Re:Rural America? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    You are completely wrong. I grew up in rural Oklahoma. The second I turned 18, I got the heck out of there. I now live in an urban area on the west coast. The people in my town were not "real, hard working honest people". They were mostly stupid idiots with no ambition and no imagination. And yes, they were all a bunch of bigoted idiots.

    Having endured these people for many years, I have earned the right to mock them.

    And yes, I am a liberal (especially on social issues) democrat who visits star bucks most every day, an atheist, have an advanced degree, earns a six figure salary as a senior software architect at a high tech company, and I drive a Saab. And I'm a Mac user (and a snob about OS X.)

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  99. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Well, gotta say, Arkansas isn't so bad. Think of the large amount of $$'s in the state. Heard of Wal-Mart? Started and still hq'ed there.

    Acxiom...one of the largest dealers and maintainers of 'people data' started in Conway, and has expanded into Little Rock. Trans-Union relies on them for data needs...so, they do indeed handle a lot of data.

    Alltel is based in Little Rock.

    Steven's corporation and many other financial houses are in AR. So...it isn't quite a po-dunk as you might think. Hell, in Little Rock..seems that most people there are Dr.'s or Lawyers...UAMS has one of the leading eye centers and cancer centers in the world.

    I did find the IT wages were a little low about 10 years ago...especially compared to TX. I'm wondering what bill rates are there? There is a lot of rural left in AR, but, Little Rock is nicely metropolitan. Not as much to do there as where I live now (New Orleans)....but, people are pretty nice...southern friendly...and a good place to raise a family.

    I wonder what their bill rates are there? Cost of living is pretty low...

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  100. This has been coming. by CodeHog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been working with outsourcing for over a year and 1/2 now. We've been talking about how we should move to some rural area with low taxes, property values, and housing costs for a year now. It just makes sense IF you can get quality individuals working for you. And it will happen more frequently as fed up highly talented individuals get tired of the rat race and decide to move somewhere, uh, less rat racy. I know of one person on the team who now works from Idaho after moving from Chicago. Do the math, Idaho cost of living is < Chicago and they experienced no pay decreases! Another person moved from Chicago to rural Wisconsin and kept the same pay. If the company is willing, you'll see a migration from the cities to the small towns over the next few years. I personally think it's great. The 80's and 90's were an era of migration from these rural areas where the jobs had been drying up rapidly (I'm a case in point, couldn't get a job in my hometown doing what I do, still can't). Hopefully that trend will reverse somewhat. America is loosing it's small town / rural heritage and I believe that heritage is part of what made America a great place in the first place.

    --
    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    1. Re:This has been coming. by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Think http://www.titonka.com/TAED.htm Titonka. If we can get even a small shop set up here, it would make a huge difference to our community.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  101. Even closer to home by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    It'd be nice if big-city coastal employers would look even closer to "home" and consider outsourcing to smaller urban areas in the so-called flyover states. Former manufacturing centers in the Midwest (and presumably elsewhere) are full of hard-working, English-speaking, and (yes) highly-qualified potential employees with ready access to broadband connectivity, FedEx offices around the corner, etc. These cities have most of the other benefits of having employees in Silicon Valley or the Big Apple, but at a fraction of the cost of living.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  102. Stream did this before moving to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies like Stream (one of the big tech support sweat shops) did this before moving stuff to India. They came into a small town in Montana, demanded a TON of CORPORATE WELFARE in the form of tax breaks, etc. Then just a couple of years later they shutdown and moved to India.

  103. Ah fer one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welkum y'all skoal-spittin' code-writin' overlords!

  104. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the list! Now I know who else to boycott.

  105. Thinking in Hopi and Navajo languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why contract with South Asians when you can contract with businesses run by good old American Indians?

    This is not as funny as it seems. I often though Hopi would make excellent computer programmers. People who speak Hopi fluently can you tell you that the language does not support ambiguity.

    Navajo is another language that may be good for "thinking like a computer programmer". The language's grammar has something similar to the "type-safety" found in OO languages like C++ and Java. The type-safety comes from the verb-to-noun combinations. This forces speakers to be specific. They can use abstractions, but speaking vaguely is nearly impossible.

    I'm sure somebody on the reservation could help you admin your Apache server.

    Navajo is similar to the Apache language family. They should be able to talk to the Apache server easily.

    1. Re:Thinking in Hopi and Navajo languages by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      So, as long as you have a Hopi customer specifying a program to a Hopi programmer, you're in good shape!

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:Thinking in Hopi and Navajo languages by bondjamesbond · · Score: 1

      I'm being serious when I ask:
      how the HELL did you know that??

    3. Re:Thinking in Hopi and Navajo languages by schtum · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness (okay, half seriousness), this goes a long way in explaining why Native Americans were so easily duped into selling their land. Mastering ambiguity is a prerequisite for business negotiations! I can only imagine how it went:

      White Guy: We will trade you something of indescribable value for a bunch of dirt.
      Native: Wow, it's a deal!
      White Guy: As promised, eight shiny beads!
      Native: What value do these have?
      White Guy: None that I could describe. Now about that dirt ... your village is sitting on it.

  106. I just left Arkansas by thebra · · Score: 1

    to move to DFW area for tech jobs, guess it is time to pack up and move back.

  107. inner bigness by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is exactly what the country needs: "Blue" business/culture centers connecting directly with "Red" labor centers. More intercommunication is the only way to bridge the unsustainably deep divides between Blue/Red communities. American strength in diversity relies also on rural areas, perhaps homogenous internally, but part of the landscape that makes America a microcosm of the world. Why should American globalism rest on a hollow foundation, ignoring the interior solely to harness the exterior?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:inner bigness by greg_barton · · Score: 0

      You've hit the nail on the head.

      But... Keeping red states poor and uninformed is essential to continued right wing dominance of the country. That's why "rural sourcing" will never be allowed to work.

    2. Re:inner bigness by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      When "carphones" become "phonecars", after mobile messaging is fully integrated into pickup trucks, RedneckNet will offer P2P power to the people, integrated with the rest of the country and the world. Gunracks will go global, as rednecks learn that they're everywhere, and have quite a bit of diversity of their own. It's important to remember that their communications progress won't make them more politically "progressive" (in current political terms), but it will offer the chance to counter the monopoly over their imaginations and conversations of the Republican Party's talking points. Once they're dialed into the national conversation platform, the power of the people to reach consensus without mediation by the government will kick in. And the results will likely influence both the rightward consensus of the old isolated communities, and the leftward consensus of the old connected communities, forming a new dynamic balance.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  108. Re:What's the big deal? by over_exposed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Completely off topic... this is in regards to your sig, "Will slashdot ever drag itself into the year 2004 and provide the ability to edit posts?"

    Why would they? There are way too many other issues to sort out first. What happens if I make a post and get modded +5 insightful (Ok, I know it'll never happen, but this is hypothetical), then I decide to edit it into a 5 page GNAA rant? Does it keep the +5 insightful? Does it lose all mod points? Would those mod points go back to the moderator? Way too much stuff to manage for a feature taht will just get abused. Like the box says (paraphrased), if you see a typo, you should have used the preview button!

    --
    "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
  109. Definite Selling Points-Broadband. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, Indianapolis has broadband. Just because you're working in Indiana, doesn't mean that your customers have to be. This could be a contractors dream. Plus Chicago is a short trip from here. So's Ohio, amoung other cities (Crossroads of America don't you know)

    Sincerly: a hoosier.

    1. Re:Definite Selling Points-Broadband. by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the situation I'm in. I'm in northern Indiana with broadband and close enough to drive to Chicago, Detroit, or Indianapolis within a few hours. I can get to a meeting in any of those areas on a day's notice. Since there's usually no need for me to be on-site for my business, I could technically work from anywhere. It's a pretty nice situation.

      My area has a very low cost of living. I bought my first house last year for about $115k. It's just a 3 bedroom ranch with an unfinished basement (oh, the things I will do with that!). In Chicago-land, it would have run about $200k. In Arizona (a fast-growing area), it would push $250k. I can't imagine what it would go for in California.

      Cost of living is a huge factor. Last year, Indiana outsourced a programming project to India - and then opted out of it so they could offer it to in-state contractors first.

  110. Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by TamMan2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bad public schools are a myth. There are, of course, exceptions, but it is not the schools that are bad, but the parents.

    Private schools appear to be better than public schools simply because the parents care enough to pay for what they percieve to be better than what they could get for free. These parents that care take part in their child's education to a much greater extent.

    In my home town there were 4 large public high schools and 1 large private high school, all 5 about the same size (there were perhaps a half dozen small private high schools as well). The public high school in the nice part of town produced 12 national merit scholars the year I graduated, the private high school only produced 4, the other 3 public high schools combined to produce 6. The funding and administrators were the same for all 4 public schools. What could account for the difference in performance? I submit that it was the families. The well to do are more likely to be well educated, the well educated tend to care more about their kids education, those who care about education tend to have kids that do well in school, because they put an emphasis on it at home, they help their kids with their home work.

    Do you honestly think privitization will solve anything?

    Do you think kids who don't do their homework in public school will do it in private school?

    Do you think parents who don't go to public school PTA meetings, will go to private school ones?

    The only thing that will happen when we start sending kids who were failing in public school to private school in large numbers, is that the private schools will suck too.

    -Tamman2000, proud product of Peoria public schools, district 150.

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by Surt · · Score: 1

      Bad public schools are most definitely not a myth. Most of the k-12 schools in georgia are literally falling apart. The teachers are highly incompetent, and the higher ups promote teaching creation in the schools.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact you admit to being from Peoria says something about your character. Also, just because something is true in your home town does not make it true everywhere. Just because both public and private schools suck where you live doesn't make them equal. Try going into Chicago and checking out their public schools some random day. Oh, you won't be able to, because there are armed guards who won't let you in. That sounds like a reassuring place to learn.

    3. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      There are some private schools that take in "high-risk" students on charity-funded grants (or recently, gov't vouchers), so we have a test of how much difference is attributable to the self-selection bias you describe. Private schools still perform better, though not as dramatically (yeah, yeah, should have a source here).

      Beyond that, public schools that operate in areas where strong private or parochial schools exist often perform much better. The performance of the private schools puts a lower limit on how bad the public schools can get before political pressure takes the form of, "do it the way they do it." Suburban public schools have to compete with each other; poorly performing schools slow down new development and that hits the tax base, so they have an incentive to perform.

      The worst thing to happen to public education was the massive consolidation of school districts after WWII. What little competition existed got snuffed out and administrators became far too close to gov't beauracracy and far too removed from the students in their charge. A logical reform would be to break them up again, but privatization seems be more in the current zeitgeist.

      In the end, it is really about competition and institutional incentives to perform. It is possible to do that within a gov't framework and, conversely, possible to botch privatization by providing the poor incentives (witness Amtrak). But a privatized structure makes it much easier to provide proper incentives.

    4. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by HanzoSpam · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think privitization will solve anything?

      Do you think kids who don't do their homework in public school will do it in private school?

      Do you think parents who don't go to public school PTA meetings, will go to private school ones?


      Probably not, but at least the taxpayers won't be stuck with the bill for attempting to educate useless students.

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    5. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      Try going into Chicago and checking out their public schools some random day. Oh, you won't be able to, because there are armed guards who won't let you in. That sounds like a reassuring place to learn.

      Yes, and private schools would have the same problem if they had those students. That was my point.

      The fact you admit to being from Peoria says something about your character.

      What is wrong with admitting I am a Peorian?

      I think you don't know much about Peoria, the south end is BAD. I knew someone who was killed in a gang initiation drive by, and he was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, that doesn't count all the kids who joined gangs I knew who got killed.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    6. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      Bad public schools are most definitely not a myth. Most of the k-12 schools in georgia are literally falling apart. The teachers are highly incompetent...

      That wouldn't be the case if the parents cared.

      and the higher ups promote teaching creation in the schools.

      And the private schools aren't teaching it already?

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    7. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not, but at least the taxpayers won't be stuck with the bill for attempting to educate useless students.

      Where do you think the vouchers come from?

    8. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      There are some private schools that take in "high-risk" students on charity-funded grants (or recently, gov't vouchers), so we have a test of how much difference is attributable to the self-selection bias you describe. Private schools still perform better, though not as dramatically (yeah, yeah, should have a source here). emphasis mine.

      I definitly would buy that, don't need a source... But how would it be if the trend of was carried out to the limit where all of the students now in the public schools are in the private schools?

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    9. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      Probably not, but at least the taxpayers won't be stuck with the bill for attempting to educate useless students.


      No, but we will be stuck with the bill to lock them up when the useless students become useless criminals. Education is way cheaper than incarceration.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    10. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by Surt · · Score: 1

      Actually, the parents do care, but don't have the resources or the legal access to improve the schools.

      And the private schools are teaching it, but I don't think that's a reflection on the poorness of the public schools.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    11. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if we put them to work...or kill them

    12. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      From what I have seen on studies of privatizing education, the suburban schools wouldn't improve all that much; they already face some competition, and the districts are small enough (though probably still larger than optimum) that the community can oversee them reasonably effectively. In fact, opponents of school choice have been known to drum up support by presenting the specter of masses of urban children from broken homes flooding the local district (which is a fallacy, the incoming children will be the most ambitious achievers, not the most problematic). Costs, however, would probably go down because the management would be in a better position to resist many of the stupider conceits promulgated by the teachers' unions. And the "service factor" would improve (in-school daycare, early graduations, more convienient locations by renting commercial space instead constructing special-purpose buildings, instruction over the internet, etc.)

      The big improvement would be in the big urban districts. There is always going to be the bottom 20% who have no interest in learning or whose homes are too broken for any school to make a difference, and the top 10% will self-educate even against tremendous obstacles. It's that middle 70% that can be saved if schools can be privatized or otherwise reformed for real competition.

      I don't know if the utterly stifling, conformist environment, that makes high school such an awful place, will improve. That may be a unavoidable consequence of putting so many teenagers in the same place.

    13. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by antirename · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about the whole creation thing, as I'm not a teacher, but schools in south Georgia (if you live in a city, or even medium sized town) are just holding pens for juvenile criminals. Before I tell this story,let me just say that my teachers were good. I was also AP, in other words taking classes for college credits in high school, so my experience with teachers might not be representative. Anyway, school here is not intended to teach anyone anything, it just keeps the thugs off the street during the day, and that's all. And no, I'm not an old geezer here. But I did wind up in the hospital with a homicide detective busy taking polaroids when I woke up courtesy of those thugs that need an education (they thought I had lost too much blood to make it, so they called homicide to the hospital). The school told the news media that there had been "a minor scuffle between students", and that no one had been seriously injured. The news corrected the story about a week later when my family got pissed about the coverage, but all the school wanted to do was cover it up. Three surgeries later, I disagree on the amount of injury. 7 or 8 on one, you don't win, even if you're Bruce Lee, which I'm not. The thugs involved just wanted to beat someone down to intimidate everyone else, and I looked like an easy target. When it went to court their lawyers tried to claim that their clients should be let off because I had martial arts training and had mananged to break a few bones (ribs, that's all you can really kick for when you have a number of people pounding on you) before the aforementioned thugs ALL piled on top of me. That defense didn't work, a couple (who dindn't get charged as adults) got convicted and expelled, but... Fuck public schools in Georgia. If I ever have kids, I'll do whatever it takes to put them in private school. I'll live on Ramen when I'm 40 if that's what it takes to keep them out of the public school system. Oh yeah, since it was a race crime (I'm white, by the way... who cares as I've already probably already said enough to Google for) the only black detective in the city was given the case. Everyone involved who could be charged as adult, nothing. The detective told the judge in court, with a straight face, that the "records had been lost". The judge wasn't happy, but there wasn't much he could do either. Why do we keep people like this in school? Down south, you have to, or someone will pull the race card (happened in my case with the school board). I personally think that some problems are more associated to income and social status than race, and that some races in this area are lower income, if you look at the statistics. I will note, however, that the school board member who claimed racism was investigated a few years later for letting a crack dealer live with her (I think she got off). I'll also note that all of my attackers managed to get themselves killed in gang-related incidents, except the two that jumped me in the first place. They are in the Federal pen for dealing crack out of a housing project in Atlanta. Is that what you want your kids going to school with? In the same town, they found a 6th grader selling coke. I'll cough up the money for private school if I ever have to, even it means living in a duplex somewhere. I don't want my kids having a cop tell them when they are 15 (my father was military and deployed) "Have a gun? Let me see it. Ok, know how to use it? Good, it's loaded. Ignore Detective so-and-so. Don't worry too much about those death threats to your mother on the answering machine, you need to rest, but sleep with the gun. I'll be back tomorrow when the rest of the pictures get developed". If you can afford to send your kids to something other than the public meat grinder, and you live in south Georgia, none of this is exaggerated or made up. This shit happens, you just don't hear about it.

    14. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by pnuema · · Score: 1
      I can't believe intelligent people actually believe in this "No Child Left Behind" voucher crap. Geez.

      Let me spell this out for you:

      1. The single greatest predictor of academic performance is income level. Speculate why all you want, there it is.

      2. Vouchers only cover a portion of private school tuition. THOSE FUNDS ARE TAKEN AWAY FROM THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHEN A CHILD LEAVES. Public schools are funded per student.

      3. Poor people are the ones most in need of relief in the educational system (see #1). However, they are also the least likely to be able to afford the remainder of private school tuition - the stuff not covered by the voucher - not to mention the added transportation burdens, etc.

      So, what voucher systems do is provide the wealthiest children in a district (i.e. the ones most capable of incurring the extra costs of private school) with a means of taking money away from the children WHO ARE LEFT BEHIND at a failing public school. Its the stupidest thing I have ever heard, and I can't believe intelligent people are still talking like it is a good thing.

      Course, I do live smack in the middle of "Jesusland", so I'm not nearly as incredulous as I should be.

    15. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      For most of your post, I will just say that I hope you are right, but I am a sceptic. Let's just say that I have seen to much corportate stupidity in my day to accept that corporations are inherantly more efficient, or more responsive than government organizations.

      But this part of your post:
      In fact, opponents of school choice have been known to drum up support by presenting the specter of masses of urban children from broken homes flooding the local district (which is a fallacy, the incoming children will be the most ambitious achievers, not the most problematic).

      Could you explain how this condition could exist as anything more than a transient? The way I see it happening (correct me please, if I am wrong), is that in the first year, the top 10% of bad public highschool goes to the private school, and the next year, the top 10% of the remaining go...

      eventually there are so few people left in the public school (or they are all failing so miserably) that the school gets shut down, and they all go to the private school, which then has to deal with all of the kids that were bringing the public school down.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    16. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by HanzoSpam · · Score: 1

      No, but we will be stuck with the bill to lock them up when the useless students become useless criminals. Education is way cheaper than incarceration.

      Since we've already established that that's where the useless students are ending up anyway, what's the point of spending the additional funds pretending we're giving them an education?

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    17. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      Let me tell you a story about corporate mismanagement...
      Dennis Kozlowski, CEO of Tyco International, had Wall Street fooled as he pumped the stock and lived high on the hog at corporate expense. But after a few years, the effects of competition, along with enforcement of ordinary fiduciary malfeasance laws, caught up with him.

      Now let me tell you a story about public school mismanagement...
      Clifford B Janey was superintendent of Rochester Public schools from 1995 to 2002, until the budget was wrecked and he got the boot while the people cheered (admittedly in poor taste). Career ending event? Nope, he got $262,000 severence and, a year later, the $250,000 a year job as superintendent of DC schools!

      That, my friend, is the diference between corporate mismanagement and public school mismangement. It's not just bad students bringing the public schools down.

    18. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      For every Kozlowski they catch, how many do you think get away?

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    19. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      Oh, they don't all get caught, my point is is that, in the public sector, poorly performing executives continue to be promoted. In the private sector, some get caught, but some simply get pushed out and have to live out their remaining days sipping pina coladas in the Caymans, as happened to Gerald Levin, whose merge of T-W with AOL was really, really bad business, but not a criminal act. That may not appeal much to our sense of justice, but it does stop them from doing any more harm.

      There is a reason for this. Corporate CEO's are hired by the board of directors, who themselves are elected by the stockholders. That tends to populate the board with major stockholders, because (a) they vote for themselves, and (b) smaller stockholders vote for those who have an interest improving the value of the stock. That means CEO's are selected by a group of people that have a strong interest in scrutinizing the candidate. Any past "irregularities" will probably be discovered.

      (On a side note, the rise of the mutual funds over the last couple decades has weakened this system. Mutual funds are restricted from participating in boardroom politics, so, as in democracy, poor leaders are elected by stockholders that don't vote. Warren Buffet, however, is free to meddle as much as he wants. By finding companies, owned largely by mutual funds, that need boardroom reform, he has made almost as much money as Bill Gates. In a twisted sort of way, mutual funds' popularity has undermined our public schools: emasculated boardrooms overpay corporate executives, which sucks talent out of the school systems, leaving political players in those jobs, and truly competent businessmen aghast when they discover how schools are run.)

      The process of hiring a superintendent, however, consists of looking at what college he went to and what districts he has previously managed. Schools (as of today) aren't intended to turn a profit so metrics of performance are hard to come by and easily gamed (fudged). Promotions ride more on being politically connected and not spouting off something that might look bad in the papers. (The latter is one reason public schools are so resistant to reform...a superintendent is better off being fired by a reform-hungry electorate than doing something bold & innovative.) So up the ladder they go.

      This is why I say large school districts should be broken up, or even better, privatized. Right now, the community has to vest a tremendous amount of power (and money) in a superintendent for which they have very little information to judge his competency, and little means to oversee his performance. That's a huge mangerial bottleneck. You wouldn't, after looking at a resume, hand $20,000 to someone to buy a car for you. But that is exactly what we do with public schools.

    20. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      Oh, they don't all get caught, my point is is that, in the public sector, poorly performing executives continue to be promoted. In the private sector, some get caught, but some simply get pushed out and have to live out their remaining days sipping pina coladas in the Caymans, as happened to Gerald Levin, whose merge of T-W with AOL was really, really bad business, but not a criminal act. That may not appeal much to our sense of justice, but it does stop them from doing any more harm.

      I can tell you from experience that bad execs at large coorporations do get promoted (in my experience at least as often as they get pushed out).

      There is a reason for this. Corporate CEO's are hired by the board of directors, who themselves are elected by the stockholders. That tends to populate the board with major stockholders, because (a) they vote for themselves, and (b) smaller stockholders vote for those who have an interest improving the value of the stock. That means CEO's are selected by a group of people that have a strong interest in scrutinizing the candidate. Any past "irregularities" will probably be discovered.

      School officials are elected in some places, and in others hired by elected officials who are themselves resposible to the electorate. These people have made just as much a career out of scrutinizing others as has anyone in the corporate world.

      The process of hiring a superintendent, however, consists of looking at what college he went to and what districts he has previously managed. Schools (as of today) aren't intended to turn a profit so metrics of performance are hard to come by and easily gamed (fudged).

      They hire execs by seeing where his MBA is from and looking at past companies he has managed. And you can very easily canablize a companies future for profits on your watch without having it show up on your balance sheets, so the corporate metrics are easily fudged as well.

      Promotions ride more on being politically connected and not spouting off something that might look bad in the papers. (The latter is one reason public schools are so resistant to reform...a superintendent is better off being fired by a reform-hungry electorate than doing something bold & innovative.) So up the ladder they go.

      The exact same thing is true in corporate america, except, instead of getting promoted for not fixing the broken system, they more often get promoted for attempting to fix it and making it worse, or fixing something that wasn't broken.

      This is why I say large school districts should be broken up, or even better, privatized.

      breaking up large districts is fine... but privitization is askinig for trouble.

      Right now, the community has to vest a tremendous amount of power (and money) in a superintendent for which they have very little information to judge his competency, and little means to oversee his performance.

      And having a private entity gets more information how?

      You wouldn't, after looking at a resume, hand $20,000 to someone to buy a car for you. But that is exactly what we do with public schools.

      And it is exactly what we would be doing with private schools, except someone else takes the check...

      I have to ask you one question:
      How many years have you worked for a company with more than 1000 employees? Your optimism about the abilities of private companies seems to indicate a lack of exposure to me...

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    21. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      We seem to differ on matters of fact, and on those, mostly on mattters of degree. Yes some bad execs get promoted in the private sector, but less often and not as far, and they are usually not as bad. Yes corporate performance figures can be fudged, but they are still better than public sector performance metrics. School boards do scrutinize superintendent candidates, but for the wrong things. A privatized school system will have managerial bottlenecks, but less extreme. I'm not claiming perfection in the privatized world, only that it is better than the current system (when properly implemented...no Amtraks here!).

      In the end, I can say it's true, but I can't make you believe it. This is not the sort of thing I can post a link to, "blah blah webpage whatever sez so." A web cite is not credible on this topic, and few print sources are. These are conclusions I have accumulated while maneuvering my career through the minefield and watching with a critical eye over many years. I've explained it the best I can, take it for whatever it is worth.

      If you must know, in my 18 years in engineering, I have been employed by 4 large organiztions of the sort you describe, covering 9 of those years. Plus, as a component supplier, I see quite a bit of the politcial tribulations that go on inside our customers (who are mostly large companies). In the short term it can look like corporate players can beat the system, but market forces are as inexorable as gravity, and my career has seen four company presidents above me, and countless middle management, get canned (deservedly). Having said all that, I perhaps should include the caveat that I avoid getting jobs at organizations that have a pervasively pathological management culture, so my experience may be better than most, but I hope you will excuse me for not wanting to have the experience of an employer's bankruptcy on my resume!

    22. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      We seem to differ on matters of fact, and on those, mostly on mattters of degree.

      Finaly, something we agree on :)

      good day...

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  111. Shells made from depleted uranium by benhocking · · Score: 1

    Shells made from depleted uranium have more penetration power because they are denser. I've never heard of bullets made from plutonium, however, and doubt they exist.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  112. That is extremely insensitive... by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

    to boxes of rocks everywhere:)

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  113. SAP AG Already Doing This by mirio · · Score: 1

    SAP already does something very similar to this with their headquarters in Germany. I've been there several times. I was a little shocked to see that they are not located in Frankfurt or any other large city, they are located in a small town called Waldorf. As best as I could tell, they were the only thing in town. There really doesn't even seem to be a hotel there as we always stay in Hidelburg, which is just a 10-15 minute drive away.

  114. Is Rural America the New Code Name for Prisons ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pardon me, but check out which corporation owns the most prisons, and you will find friendship links leading to the current administration.

    In the meantime, FEMA has all these camps equipped, staffed, and empty.

    Logic would indicate, the closest one could come to outsourced jobs on labor competition is in the prision system and that it could be sold to the public as 'paying back society fine' in real time.

  115. If it was just about being conquered, then you... by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...would have a point. Unfortunately for your argument it isn't.

    It's true that the US and Canada did conquer many tribes and take away a lot of land, but most of the remaining tribes weren't conquered, rather they tended to settle with the US and agreed to a series of treaties. Eventually the US government decided to settle with the tribes uniformly so they could co-exist with the states, while being bound by federal law.

    Now, if I can address you last comment.

    Personally, I think the Indians should feel lucky that we gave them anything at all instead of just assimilating them into our society as just one more ethnic group in the already-growing melting pot.

    If you were an Indian, that statement would probably sound a lot like: Personally, I think the Jews should feel lucky we didn't gas and incinerate them all.

    While saying circumstances could always be worse is technically a valid point, it's appalling and bad form to use it to play down culpability for any atrocity.

  116. Red Neck Technology... by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

    You could always outsource your Oracle work to Donald K. Burleson.

    There's also good job oportunities there, provided you can follos the dress code. Is it just me, or does this guy have a strange obsession with body hair.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  117. Dell did this a few years back..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometime in 2001, Dell moved a call center into my hometown of Twin Falls, ID - saves them a gob on wages (Dell techs start @ $9.76 there) and helps the weak economy around these parts to boot....

  118. All Valid Points, but Misses the Mark by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 1

    While I ENTIRELY agree with your opinion on being compensated for past offenses committed by dead people, I have to point out that it had nothing to do with the US or Canada's policies with Native American people or their sovereignty.

    Lastly, it also has very little to do with many Native Americans complaints with the US or Canadian governments. However, I'm sure you can cite exceptions.

  119. Count me in-Rural Arcologies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now dont think that I'm one of those people that hate driving. I LOVE to drive, I hate HAVING to drive. Suburbs are evil, I applaud companies that stay in the cities."

    http://www.arcosanti.org/theory/arcology/intro.htm l

    Bet you can't wait for arcologies to come on the scene.

    1. Re:Count me in-Rural Arcologies. by sugam · · Score: 1

      Perfect! I'd love to live in SimCity!

      --
      read my blog
  120. Re:The Difference (my experiences) by OoSync · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now, substitue that by income level of families and then we're talking.

    My basic point is that less-well-to-do families have a harder time producing children that do well in school. Economic health is a good indicator for many other problems that less able students face. Lack of proper nutrition, lack of proper materials (i.e., paper, pencils, clothes, shoes, coats, etc.), parents that are less able to spend quality time with the kids, kids from families with a poor social life together, stigmatization from their peers, and families that just resent the kid for ever being born.

    You can quibble with me on details and specific cases, but I've been there and seen all of it in action throughout my life. I was a poor kid, but my mother was smart and loving enough to do the right things to help me get ahead in life. She's now a teacher, teaching many children from the POOREST parts of southeast Georgia.

    Her kids are the poorest economically and educationally. She does her best, but there's no escaping the effects of simply being dirt poor.

    So, in a roundabout way, my point is that comparing performance by economic groups is probably a better way to compare school performance in each state. I don't have the data for this, but maybe I'll look into it.

    My suspicion (and I've been told by others that there is data to back this up, any pointers are helpful to confirm this), is that middle-class and up kids do quite damn good across the nation. Poor kids don't do so good across the nation. Differences in other states can probably be correlated to distribution of incomes among populations across the nation.

    In other words, poor-performing schools and states are more likely to be such because of a larger share of economically poor families (students) to better-off families.

    --

    I always get the shakes before a drop.
  121. Oh great-Incentive to progress. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A call center could create a lot jobs, plus for those forced to relocate, St. Louis is only a couple hours away, and Chicago is 5 or 6 hours up I-57."

    There's another benifit no one's seeing. The incentive to bring broadband to rural areas.

  122. Not conquered....robbed by Kris+Warkentin · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that many of these Indian tribes were not conquered and didn't surrender. They signed treaties which were then broken by the white man.

    --

    In Soviet Russia, hot grits put YOU down THEIR pants.
  123. smoke screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anyone get the feeling the uber rich of the world are majorly screwing the middle-class and trying to make the divide bigger.

    Maybe come next election, the people should vote out all the corporate ho's in congress, senate and the white house. It's time the people get represented, instead of getting shafted. Most of the time projects fail because of bad managers. Who are the bad managers? The guys at the top define the culture and it goes down from there. Those people come from rich families with lots of inherited wealth. So while these idiot asswipes fire a bunch of workers for cheaper workers, they double their own salaries.

    throughout history, it's always been a struggle between the rich and poor. any pretense otherwise is wishful thinking. The uber rich can get richer by farming out the work to other countries. </rant.

  124. As long as it's not exclusively the rural South... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that gets the work. All that money shouldn't go to just one family.

  125. Alabama by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    We also have very little traffic, nice neighborhoods, good schools, cheap houses, and low property taxes.

    ...for the white people that is. From what I hear, if you're not white and Protestant in Alabama, you get to live in the crappy neighborhoods in the crappy houses, are regarded with disdain and disgust by the locals, and are generally blamed for everything that goes wrong.

    At least that's how the stereotype goes here in California. Sometimes I'm skeptical about that, but occasionally someone who lived in the southern states tells me that racism is still fairly overt there. That could be a *huge* disadvantage living in a rural area or anywhere in the South, especially if you don't fit in.

    Is there any truth to that?

    1. Re:Alabama by liam52269 · · Score: 1

      In a word... bulls--t.

      I grew up amongst whites, blacks, Lebanese, Greeks, Vietnamese, Hispanics, etc... Protestants, Catholics, Non-denoms, Jews, Buddhists, etc. etc.... in the same neighborhoods, in the same schools, on the same Little League teams....

      Folks in California should practice what they preach as far as stereotyping goes. Racism isn't anymore overt in the South than it is anywhere else.

      Wise up.

    2. Re:Alabama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was an item on the ballot in Alabama in the last election to get rid of segregation-era language from the State constitution. It failed of course.

      I don't know who you think you are fooling, but Alabama is a racist state. I don't really have any hope of convincing you, but for the other people reading this, do some research. When this guy says "Racism isn't anymore overt in the South than it is anywhere else" - he is lying to you. Google for "alabama segregation amendment", do your due diligence and then make up your own mind.

    3. Re:Alabama by phuturephunk · · Score: 1

      I've split my time pretty equally between living up in the northeast (where I was born) and in Florida (where I spent alot of my formidable years), and I can tell you that I've encountered more overt racist episodes in the 4 1/2 years I've lived back in NY then I did living almost a decade down south. I think the difference is the politeness. People down south seem to respond, no matter what the color, positively in most cases when you're polite and you conduct yourself in a calm manner.

      New York, with it's old ethnic enclaves, full of old, stereotypically set mindsets (think italian neighborhoods especially) are much more suspsicious of darker people. I think it has to do with Title 1 and Title 2 back in the 60's that birthed the Projects and Urban Decay. These people carry a grudge against blacks because they believe that the 'old neighborhood' went to shit because of the migrating blacks from the south in the middle of last century who came to northern industrial cities looking for opportunity. When they were given the cold shoulder by the leadership back then and shoved in the projects, the ensuing decay and rise in crime left a bad taste all around. Is it inherantly their fault? I'd say no, considering any group of people would face the same situation if opportunity was taken away and education was neglected (which is exactly what happened in places like NYC, Philly and Chi-town). This of course will lead to an indigenous population becoming angry at new commers, moreso than people (like southerners) who have lived with blacks in great numbers for a much longer period of time.

      There is a myth about the old 'free states' and that myth, too often held by people from NY, paints some kind of ridiculous utopian picture of the way places like NY are..which is patently false.

      Just sayin..

    4. Re:Alabama by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

      I don't know *anybody* in Alabama that voted against this because they wanted the segregationist language to stay -- they voted against it because there was a huge campaign against a "hidden" education bill that got buried in the wording. Even the hick callers to the local conservative AM radio station wanted the language changed, they just wanted to send a message that you can't mix a popular measure with an unrelated unpopular measure just hoping to get them both voted in.

      Even I voted for it reluctantly, even though I supported both the language change and the education bill, because I am for a re-write of then entire state consitution, which is longest and most amended one in the U.S.

      And for the other Anonymous Coward who said that all Southerners are racist rednecks, I would like to point out that the only time I ever hear the word "nigger" is when I'm listening to hip-hop music, watching movies, or overhearing 70+ year old country hicks talk.

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  126. Re:If it was just about being conquered, then you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are two problems with your Holocaust analogy:

    1 - The people who were punished for what happened to the Jews were actually involved with what happened to the Jews. Most Americans had nothing to do with the conquering of the American Indian and neither did their ancestors.

    2 - In the last century we started to look down on these things a lot more than throughout history. 200 years ago no one would have cared about Milosevic and the serbs, or the Ugandan refugees.

  127. i must be stupid because I like in georgia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There seems to be this undisputed fact that people in southern areas are idiots and "taulk like a mo ron! uh huh" But its not true.

    every hear of ...
    Georgia Tech?
    Emory University?
    Mercer University?
    Auburn University?
    University of Georgia?
    LSU?
    Savannah college of art and design?

    When you stereo type all "southeners" as stupid it shows your own ignorance more than anything else.

    1. Re:i must be stupid because I like in georgia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But its not true.

      You meant "it's", you fucking southern moron.

      Fuck the south. All your "universities" teach you is how to wave the confederate flag, go to nascar, and vote republican.

      And btw, your accent sounds like shit. Learn to talk.

    2. Re:i must be stupid because I like in georgia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLMMFAO!

    3. Re:i must be stupid because I like in georgia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. No I haven't heard of any of these places.

  128. Three of them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm from North Carolina (the least backward Carolina!)

    I know of North Carolina and South Carolina. What's the third one?

  129. I'm Reminded... by jjohnson · · Score: 1

    of something a friend told me. She's a producer for a series of disaster specials on TV (in syndication). She's hates it whenever the disaster she's doing is in the south because every disaster needs scientific experts to explain it, and as she puts it "it doesn't how many PhDs he has, the minute he starts talking about how it's like a chuckhole full of angry hedgehogs in a tornado, all his credibility goes out the window."

    Can you imagine a code review with these people? "Well, this function right here, it's like an Alabama wildcat with big Ns."

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  130. Something Not Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There is a more substantial difference between rural America and China/India. The rural American supports Western values: human rights, democracy, equality of women, and compassion. The Chinese/Indians oppose Western values.

    We should outsource work to only regions or nations that support Western values.

    Note that the Chinese routinely rape and kill Tibetans. Both the Chinese and the Indians support targetted abortions killing female fetuses; the ratio of male to female babies in both India and China is 1.20. The normal ratio is 1.05, which exists in both the USA and Japan.

    God damn the Chinese and the Indians.

  131. The American Clearances by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    The origin of the United States is in the lowland clearances of Scotland which has just been repeated in the heartland of America over the last century -- primarily the last half of the last century.

    What we have now, rather than a yeoman class, are effectively serfs. The difference between India and the US is that they figured out how to keep most of their serfs within extended families due to the fact that the Hindu religion is a lot less hostile to the blood bonds of clan structures than is Christianity. Christianity has essentially focused on destroying clan identity for the benefit of urban elites for the last 2 thousand years, and when it reached Scotland it set off a profound reaction. The Scotch-Irish cleared from their ancestral lands came flooding into the New World to escape their disposession by clan leaders who had been made to so identify with urban elites, that they despised their rural kin.

    Sound familiar?

    It should, its happening again.

    The result is a monetization of social bonds, requiring people to pay for what once they got from their extended families.

    There is no way rural America can compete with India on a cost basis until this fundamental betrayal of the European peoples has been redressed.

    1. Re:The American Clearances by haluness · · Score: 1

      > The Scotch-Irish cleared from their a
      ^^^^^^

      Scott

    2. Re:The American Clearances by arc.light · · Score: 1
    3. Re:The American Clearances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, life would be so much better if I were a crofter who did not have to pay for things that I used to get from my clan.

      Let's see . . . in my current pitiful state, I'd be missing out on such fun things as going to war with vastly superior forces in order to defend my clan leader's stupidity/greed/badly misplaced sense of personal honor. If I survived, I could let him choose who I will marry, and he could kill me without concern if I slightly offend him while eating dinner. I could also work my entire life away on property that I will never own or be able to pass on to my children.

      Nothing like the good old days . . .

      (I hope that was a joke.)

    4. Re:The American Clearances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So instead you get to go to war killing people who have done nothing to you, coming home to a land where no woman wants to marry you(or if she does you are unlikely to have children)-and subject to the whim of a justice system dominated by those professional liars known as attorneys-in a country where many people are deeply in debt-and few pass anything onto their children. Nothing like progress huh?

  132. Why not Appalachia??-Housing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny you should mention Appalachia. I've always felt that one could build a modular home factory of some size into the mountain(s). Good roads going in and out, same with communications. Not a big impact on the landscape. Failing that it would make a great place for warehousing (1).

    (1) Yes people you can stick businesses in the darndest places. Like an abandoned salt mine.

  133. Moving around. . . by jhobbs · · Score: 1

    Well shit. I was born, raised, and went to college in Arkansas, then I moved to Miami so I could find work. Now your telling me my job is going to be outsourced to where I came from? GOD! Life isn't fair. On the upside, I could always move back. I already speak the local language. M R mice. M R not. M R 2! C M E D B D feet? L I B, M R mice.

  134. Edge Cities by extra88 · · Score: 1

    That said, there is a trend, at least in the Chicago metro area for companies to put offices in suburbs.

    They're called edge cities and they're not exactly a new phenomenon.

  135. Woo-hoo! by smyle · · Score: 1
    Hooray for us!

    --probably the only /.er from Westmoreland KS (population 631).

    --

    Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

  136. Savage Nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen to the Savage Nation (a radio program) via the Internet. The audio is streamed. The progran is on now!

    1. Re:Savage Nation by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      Listen to the Savage Nation (a radio program)

      You misspelled "Wiener Nation".

  137. Watch them come from India then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like dotheaded cockroaches to rotten goodness.

  138. Re:If it was just about being conquered, then you. by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 1

    There are two problems with your Holocaust analogy:

    I wasn't making an analogy. I was emphasizing the point that you wouldn't tell a Jew, "Quit griping about the holocaust, when it could have been a lot worse. It could have been complete genocide."

  139. Re:If it was just about being conquered, then you. by Frogbert · · Score: 1

    They were lucky the germans didn't gas them all, but does that mean that they should be grateful? No.

  140. Rural Sourcing by Wansu · · Score: 1


    I reckin they pay 'em anuff uv a wage ta whur they kin have musterd 'n biskits three 'r four times a week. mmmmmm hmmmmm

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  141. Re:If it was just about being conquered, then you. by hobbesx · · Score: 1
    If you were an Indian...

    I have (from what I am told) a significant enough lineage through a First Nations (Indian) tribe to claim some sort of tribal benefit. To be completely honest, I don't even know what it would be- but I really don't care. I've decided to ignore any sort of claim I might be able to make, for the same reasons mentioned in the parent post. Were the things that were done to the North American Natives terrible? Without a doubt. Was the culture of most of them taken advantage of for the personal gain of settlers at the time? Of course.

    Did those actions warrant compensation? At that time, I think so.

    However, the Crusades slaughtered who knows how many- should people of Anglo descent compensate current descendents of those who were killed? What about victims of the Romans, or (sound of zipping flame suit) the Palestinians?

    How far back in the past do we have to go before people will accept that, at some point, there are terrible, painful, and attrocious things in all of our pasts, and show
    some personal responsibility for their own actions now? That'd go a hell of a lot further than arguing over a friggin' casino. Please, to borrow from Jon: Stop hurting America

    whew... Sorry for the rant, I feel better, and will now continue my lurking...

    --
    This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
    Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
  142. Yes, it is a Smoke Screen by Cryofan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You wrote:

    Anyone get the feeling the uber rich of the world are majorly screwing the middle-class and trying to make the divide bigger.

    Maybe come next election, the people should vote out all the corporate ho's in congress, senate and the white house. It's time the people get represented, instead of getting shafted. Most of the time projects fail because of bad managers. Who are the bad managers? The guys at the top define the culture and it goes down from there. Those people come from rich families with lots of inherited wealth. So while these idiot asswipes fire a bunch of workers for cheaper workers, they double their own salaries.

    throughout history, it's always been a struggle between the rich and poor. any pretense otherwise is wishful thinking. The uber rich can get richer by farming out the work to other countries. /rant.


    I think you have it exactly right. This article no doubt is a product conceived and created in some corporate think tank, designed to be a smoke screen, create some sort of wedge between sets of Americans. Just another foul product of the rightwing propaganda machine, funded by billions of dollars from billionaires and megacorporations. The rightwing propaganda machine consists mainly of think tanks and foundations (Heritage, Cato, American Enterprise Institute, et al.), and has thousands of scholars, writers, media consultants, etc, in its pay.

    What is really sad is that you seem to be the only one here who has seen this article for what it is.

    See my homepage (via my sig) for more on the rightwing propaganda machine.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  143. This has been coming-Rural manufacturing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know in this day and age. You can move so much more away from the cities. About a quarter mile from me is a machine shop. If you look carefully there's other small businesses tucked away. With global communications, and shipping companies like UPS (has a majour hub here), Fedex. I've worked small manufacturing were the building was smaller than a Walmart building, but was quite modern inside. You'd never know just by driving by the building though. Cities are nice, but a bit overrated.

  144. Outsourcing to Rural Australia by Chatz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I worked for an Australian company that with a bit of government funding and support from a major university setup a software engineering course in a rural city (100,000 people?), where they would complete their degree part time while working on real contracts.

    No where else other than the major cities could they hope to get a degree like that in Australia. And having the work experience behind them would have made them highly employable.

    I still believe the idea was good, but starting this just as the bubble burst meant that there was little work and after a couple of years it was closed down.

    There was a lot of difficulty in attracting work to the centre since there were always about their ability being junior engineers. So we had to attract some senior engineers there as well to lead the teams. That was harder than attracting contracts, since we were the only employer in the area looking for those skills. But fundamentally the inability of the company to attract work for itself let alone the training center was its downfall.

    What happened to the people that were there? Many have now moved to the cities to complete their degrees and get work.

    --
    There is folly and foolishness on the one side, and daring and calculation on the other. - Admiral Pellew, Hornblower
  145. Never under estimate the poverty of the 3rd world by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    I keep joking that if I get several more pre-approved credit cards with 10k limits, I'm going to max them all out for cash and skip the country.

    I then fly to some impoverished third world backwater, buy a jeep full of thugs armed with guns, and take over.

    I will then rule like any proper bannana rupublic dictator, holding rigged elections and having my opponents dissapear into the jungle. But I would dig a new town well, and teach all the children how to pirate Mp3s.

    Foreign policy would be a cinch. I'd ask the US to recognise my newly formed country, and support me in power. I'd offer them an unlimited duration military base and cooperation in hunting down terrorists, provided they wern't me. I'd conduct policy based off of the theory of NOT PISSING OFF THE BIGGEST COUNRTY IN THE WORLD, something that the Taliban couldn't seem to quite grip.

    The really spooky thing is, just such a plan might work. The pathetic thing is, the people I would be ruling over actually might be better off under my system of comic tyrany than some of the legitimate governments that exist in the third world.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  146. Real Deals!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    1. * Two story
      * 3 bedroom(s)
      * 1 bath
      * Approximately 1134 sq. ft.
      * Electric heating
      * 1 car garage
      * Approximately 1 acre(s)
      * Public sewer service
      * Public water supply
      * $7,500



    SOLD!!!
  147. Fuck the Fuckin' South by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    Fuck the south. Fuck 'em. We should have let them go when they wanted to leave. But no, we had to kill half a million people so they'd stay part of our special Union. Fighting for the right to keep slaves - yeah, those are states we want to keep.

    And now what do we get? We're the fucking Arrogant Northeast Liberal Elite? How about this for arrogant: the South is the Real America? The Authentic America. Really?

    Cause we fucking founded this country, assholes. Those Founding Fathers you keep going on and on about? All that bullshit about what you think they meant by the Second Amendment giving you the right to keep your assault weapons in the glove compartment because you didn't bother to read the first half of the fucking sentence? Who do you think those wig-wearing lacy-shirt sporting revolutionaries were? They were fucking blue-staters, dickhead. Boston? Philadelphia? New York? Hello? Think there might be a reason all the fucking monuments are up here in our backyard?

    No, No. Get the fuck out. We're not letting you visit the Liberty Bell and fucking Plymouth Rock anymore until you get over your real American selves and start respecting those other nine amendments. Who do you think those fucking stripes on the flag are for? Nine are for fucking blue states. And it would be 10 if those Vermonters had gotten their fucking Subarus together and broken off from New York a little earlier. Get it? We started this shit, so don't get all uppity about how real you are you Johnny-come-lately Oooooh I've been a state for almost a hundred years dickheads. Fuck off.

    Arrogant? You wanna talk about us Northeasterners being fucking arrogant? What's more American than arrogance? Hmmm? Maybe horsies? I don't think so. Arrogance is the fucking cornerstone of what it means to be American. And I wouldn't be so fucking arrogant if I wasn't paying for your fucking bridges, bitch.

    All those Federal taxes you love to hate? It all comes from us and goes to you, so shut up and enjoy your fucking Tennessee Valley Authority electricity and your fancy highways that we paid for. And the next time Florida gets hit by a hurricane you can come crying to us if you want to, but you're the ones who built on a fucking swamp. Let the Spanish keep it, it's a shithole, we said, but you had to have your fucking orange juice.

    The next dickwad who says, It's your money, not the government's money is gonna get their ass kicked. Nine of the ten states that get the most federal fucking dollars and pay the least ... can you guess? Go on, guess. That's right, motherfucker, they're red states. And eight of the ten states that receive the least and pay the most? It's too easy, asshole, they're blue states. It's not your money, assholes, it's fucking our money. What was that Real American Value you were spouting a minute ago? Self reliance? Try this for self reliance: buy your own fucking stop signs, assholes.

    Let's talk about those values for a fucking minute. You and your Southern values can bite my ass because the blue states got the values over you fucking Real Americans every day of the goddamn week. Which state do you think has the lowest divorce rate you marriage-hyping dickwads? Well? Can you guess? It's fucking Massachusetts, the fucking center of t

    1. Re:Fuck the Fuckin' South by haapi · · Score: 1

      An excellent, concise summary, my man. Just wish I could forward to the family mailing list. Though, to be fair, they pretty much all reside in blue states, anyway, so it would be like poking 'em with a stick.

      --
      Well, apparently, you only have to fool the majority of people for a little while.
  148. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by killjoe · · Score: 1

    "but, people are pretty nice...southern friendly..."

    My experience had been that the niceness of the southern people depends on what you look and sound like. If you look and sound like them then they are nice to you. If not then not so much.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  149. Red States outreach program by inc_x · · Score: 1

    Is this an attempt by the Democrats to improve the tech-level of the Red States in the hope that once they actually have somewhat of an economy they will turn blue?

    1. Re:Red States outreach program by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

      well, god fucking forbid they prosper.

      THEY MIGHT GET UPPITY WTF.

      --

      What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  150. Let's think about this... by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

    Pro:
    Smaller timezone difference

    Con:
    Larger cultural difference

    Hmm...

    --
    "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
  151. This is Step In the Right Direction by Cheirdal · · Score: 1

    Keeping American dollars inside of America's economy is a very good thing. The next thing we need to do is to overhaul the much abused H1-B Visa program and severely cut back the number of H1-B visa's given out.

    1. Re:This is Step In the Right Direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.numbersusa.com

      Actually, Congress is going to try to INCREASE the number of H1-B's. Sometimes I wish Congress was rushing back to fulfill Bush's "moral values" mandate... they'd spend less time trying to screw over the rest of us.

  152. eToys in Virginia (PBS Special) by telemonster · · Score: 1

    A while ago there was a show on PBS that featured the eToys warehouse which was built in Blairs, Virginia (Or is it the one in Danville?).

    These people were totally thrilled. In the interviews you could see how dedicated these people were, it was insane. Then the .com popped, as did the towns economy. The trucks weren't rolling thru the town, which ment the mom and pop diners lost out on much of the business. People got laid off, and depression was high.

    I'm not sure which special it was, it might have been the one about Wal-Mart & Ashland Virginia but I'm positive. I just googled and found some references that the warehouse was picked up by K*B Toys, so maybe the people have jobs again. Of course, I think the K&B toys in the local malls are closing, IIRC. Maybe they are going online only. B&M is so 80s.

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  153. Wait, you lost me. by sideshow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry I was busy surfing the chest high waves over at Zuma and enjoying the 70 degree mid November beach weather.

    Wait, why was East Buttfuck, Wyoming better then Southern California again?

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    1. Re:Wait, you lost me. by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      Wyoming; deer hunting, elk hunting, duck hunting, antelope hunting, trout fishing, fishing in general, snomobiling, cross country skiing, down hill skiing, snow boarding, etc, etc.

      You adapt to what is in the area you live. Personally, I spent about five years in Southern Ca, and I found the beaches the least interesting place. Anza Borrego park was much more interesting, as was Cuyamaca State park. And the apples in Julian were a major surprise.

      There is more to do than time to do it whereever you are, if you are paying attention.

      On the main thread, I live out here in Soap Lake Washington, and find rural life entirely acceptable. And the people are, in general, very well informed and far from stupid.

      And as for politics, feel free to send a copy of this paragraph to the Urban Democrat of your choice. The reason we vote Republican is because the Democrats refuse to leave us alone. Leave our guns alone. Let us buy trucks without airbags (I really don't need my head blown out the back window because I dropped the front end into a plow furrow by accident.) Stop destroying our jobs because you want cheaper vacations. (I'm thinking of Slick Willie and his war on mining, logging and ranching.) Stop patronizing us as "flyover country" (would you refer to the Jewish neighborhood as hymie town, or the black neighborhood as n***** town?) And above all, don't call us a bunch of uneducated bible-thumpers. I personally have a doctorate in metallurgical engineering to go with my cranky disposition. There are at least a dozen bachelors degrees and two masters in various engineering professions at work. And I have no idea what the accounting people might have. And our religion does not enter the job except as a sense of general ethics and politeness. So, Democrats, stop whining, come back out to farm country where you used to be strong, find out what you did wrong, and fix it.

    2. Re:Wait, you lost me. by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      Hunting? You mean I get to go out and destroy something beautiful?!? Sign me up! (Not!)

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    3. Re:Wait, you lost me. by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      They are much easier to eat if you shoot them first. Trust me on this.

  154. It's about time! by beaststwo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Why hasn't anyone noticed before that pay in an area is directly tied to housing costs, and therefore you can save money by moving jobs to rural areas? I guess that's why Dr. White will hopefully make the big bucks!

    Now if we can just change a few tax loopholes to make a Government incentive to move to the country instead of over seas? Who knows? We might start another Civil War!

    But really, as jobs move to rural areas, housing prices will increase there, and tech jobs will probably wind up moving from town to town, just as textile jobs used to when I was a kid in Alabama. A town would offer little better deal and the company would move a few miles to take advantage of it. I don't think anybody won in that game, except the lawyers of course.

  155. money is money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're taking less money so you can buy a cheaper house, you're getting screwed. Equity in a coastal house is still equity. You can cash out. The money isn't less real because of the price of houses.

    What's more, coastal housing prices are more stable. Losing value is very rare. The farther you go inland, the more volatile the prices. Kinda like the weather. In contrast I know people who have been sitting on houses in rural America for the better part of a decade, unable to sell them. When they move they have to buy a second home on credit.

  156. Hope this doesn't happen by Recovering+Anonymous · · Score: 0, Troll

    Its bad enough we have to put up with loud mouthed, opinionated, elitist Northern assholes at all but to have them move next door would be totally unacceptable. It would be carpet bagging all over again. Do us all a favor stay were you are and shut up, we all tired of the wise ass cracks about Southerners.

    --
    There's no shame in being a pariah. -Marge Simpson
  157. Already being done... by Gerdia · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of Sykes (www.sykes.com)...?

  158. Der, Stoooooopid American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rural American supports Western values: human rights, democracy, equality of women, and compassion

    Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!
    You should be on television. You are such a whit!

    Equality of women. Ha Ha Ha Ha

    Compassion. From an American. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

    Human Rights (but not for dirty foreigners). Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

    Democracy. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

  159. brain fart by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    Ignore my last line, it should have said:

    Large suburban areas tend to do well also...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  160. I did it recently... by awfar · · Score: 1

    Well, except for the Ferrari... kid's college fund(!)

    Lived in the Chicago 'burbs, but the career sucked and was expensive so I returned to Michigan, in the weeds; a new home on a 300 acre sandy, all-sports lake. In full disclosure, I bought 120 ft. of frontage for $20k 10 years ago but for retirment or speculation. I now have time to pursue an advanced degree (Mich. State, Grand Valley State, Cornerstone, Calvin, WMU all within commute distance) and hobbies (building the home, local ski resort), my kids are happy here and my wife found the best paying job of her career. Family is not nearby.

    I could not have lived here before; I grew up in Michigan and it was desert island, a real backwater. But now it is possible and pleasant because of technology. Kinda weird the first few months; it's so quiet and Dark (I can see the Milky Way and often northern lights very clearly), and the Locals raise quite a ruckus on a Friday night, pissing in the streets after bar closing and pushing stop signs over...

    $2800/year taxes on a $235k home, taxes tied to inflation, sales 6%.

    The stores don't suck too bad; the locals have built quite a supply system, and Best Buy, WalMart, KMart, Meijer, RadioShack is only 10-45 minutes away. Good Chinese food, Pizza just a hop away. And these guys STILL build high performance cars, mud-boggers, snowmobiles, and motorcycles under the shade tree. This happens to be one of the poorest parts of the nation, and it shows.

    Chicago is 3.5 hours away; did the museums this summer. I won't go back there to live, unless there is REAL opportunity, not a 60hr/wk job.

  161. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by bob+beta · · Score: 1

    And you have lots of experience to cite? Or are you just referencing what you heard in the discussion boards on DemocraticUnderground?

  162. Re:It’s your money, not the government's mone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But seriously folks!

  163. In fact... by Amata · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The "media standard" for how American is spoken is based off of the educated midwestern accent.

    1. Re:In fact... by tasidar · · Score: 1

      The "media standard" for how American is spoken is based off of the educated midwestern accent.
      I always thought it was Californian...
      I had no problems being understood in any of the Southern states when I communicated with my normal "Cali" accent.
      I suppose I could thank Hollywood for that though

  164. Re:If they discover technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they would be inclined to learn how to read, OR read something aside from a book of made up fairy tales thousands of years old. With a little luck they might break out of the double digit IQ slump they have always been in.

    Thousands years old books of fairy tales is no means of making any resemblence of an intelligent decision considering all factors carefully.

  165. I need a grammar nazi with mod points!!! by protein+folder · · Score: 1

    Any grammar nazi with mod points, please step this way.

    Somebody mod the parent up, and the grandparent down, because ashot's correct and proverbialcow's not. "Perfectly well english" my ass.

    --
    Your mind is squeezed by a blast of pain!
    1. Re:I need a grammar nazi with mod points!!! by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      Sweet zombie Jesus. When did a 'wink' emoticon become necessary for people to get a joke?

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    2. Re:I need a grammar nazi with mod points!!! by protein+folder · · Score: 1

      I do remember thinking that there was a possibility that your post was supposed to be funny, maybe as some sort of obscure Simpsons quote or something, and I'm sorry I didn't put that disclaimer in my post. ashot and at least one moderator took it seriously, however, so I did also. My beef's not with you but with whoever modded you up +1 Informative.

      --
      Your mind is squeezed by a blast of pain!
    3. Re:I need a grammar nazi with mod points!!! by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      I agree - maybe that guy should go to work in rural America. ;)

      As for a Simpsons' reference, how's this one grab you?

      "Me fail English? That's unpossible!"

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  166. Already there by anvilmark · · Score: 1

    I telecommute for a major tech company. I can work anywhere there's broadband so I decided to move the family to a small town along the Rocky Mountains. I can get anywhere in town within 15 minutes. The snow capped mountains seem so close it's like you could reach out and touch them. I love it. The people are friendly and relaxed. The streets are clean and houses well kept. Way more conservative than attitudes in a metro area, but that suits me fine.

    Not all the amenities I'm used to but you can get pretty much anything over the internet - which keeps me from making those impulse purchases at Frys. :)

    I'm surprised at how bigoted /.ers are, i.e. 'hicks'. Everyone I've talked to in this 'hick' town is reasonably intelligent and articulate. True, the article specifically mentioned the south, but prevailing /. attitude seems to be "rural=trailer trash".

    (I take your reference to hicksville in the spirit intended, btw. I'd love to start up a 'recovery center' here in paradise for city-worn geeks.)

  167. Re:Southern == Racists && Bigots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the KKK can sponser highways and people there use the word "nigger" as freely as they quote their book of fairy tales (Bible) you just *might* have reason to suspect that Racism and Bigotry run nearly unchecked and wild in the South. I have lived in states such as MO, TN, AR, AL, and LA...not only are the tales of inbreeding true but the racism is disgusting.

    Make no mistake...the South is not all just like "Deliverance," but most of it is not too damn far away.

  168. Re:Ya'all reckon whut fer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yee-Haw!
    DALE EARNHARDT!
    YA'ALL see tha thar SEXY PIG ovah YONDA?!

  169. public school teachers' kids in private schools by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    If public schools are adequate, then why do public school teachers send THEIR children to private schools at TWICE the rate (25%) as the general US population (12%)? Washington Times: "Public schools no place for teachers' kids"

    1. Re:public school teachers' kids in private schools by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      If public schools are adequate, then why do public school teachers send THEIR children to private schools at TWICE the rate (25%) as the general US population (12%)? Washington Times: "Public schools no place for teachers' kids"

      I don't have the hard numbers, but what happens when you look only at the rate at which people who graduated college send their kids to private school?

      Also, you are among the many who are missing my point. The problem is the families of kids in public school can bring down the school. The teachers don't want their kids to have to be in a class full of thugs; if the kids that they tought were in private school, the teachers probably wouldn't send their own there either.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  170. Re:A real shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You voted for Bush who will make sure that investment in America will never happens if it's not oil drilling in a fragile wildlife refuge.

    Thanking yourself yet?

  171. Re:holocaust fake google keywords by Michael_Angel · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Using the key words...holocaust fake

    Will find you heck of alot of facts that make the story of the holicost not sound as bad as it has been pushed to be. in fact if you look realy close you will be shocked.

    It angers me how tv messes peoples minds up.
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=holocaus t+fak e&spell=1

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/fake/WA_Sund ay Times_301004.html
    http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/ docs/fake/SWCsmokeF ake.html

    http://www.math.metu.edu.tr/~dpierce/texts/irvin g_ trial.html

    http://www.google.com/search?q=holocaust+fake+ga s& btnG=Search&hl=en&lr=

    Look at both sides one is way heavier and its not very heavy on the victims side. None the less this was war.. but why say what they do and teach it to people as the true history..?!

  172. Re:You HAVE been to Arkansas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know they got a Sonic *everywhere*!

  173. Count me out by Xero_One · · Score: 0

    But since you're moving, can I have your apartment?

  174. If only Slashdot articles came true... by Beek · · Score: 2, Funny

    THIS IS MY DREAM. The only thing that has ever made me doubt my career choice has been my perception that I'd have to live in the city to be a software developer. If I could live in small town Alberta/Saskatchewan and write software, I'd be one step closer to living the dream.

    On that note, if anyone located in rural western Canada is looking for a developer, PLEASE EMAIL ME. MFJasonB-at-gmail.com

    PS - WTF is up with people talking about the suburbs as if they're rural areas?

  175. Re:What's the big deal? by symbolic · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    I have proposed simple solutions to these issues several times. 1. No editing after 10 minutes. 2. If, within that 10- minute period the post is edited, any mod received up to that point points are lost. 3. No need for points to go back to a moderator. Simple stuff.

  176. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by killjoe · · Score: 1

    I am speaking about real life experience. You need me to list the actual things that happened to me?

    --
    evil is as evil does
  177. When? The 50's? by FullCircle · · Score: 1

    I live in Texas, about as far South as it gets and I see more "reverse" discrimination than anything else. The white boys are the trashy ones that can't handle their money, or alternatively, they are the ones who were born into money and don't know shit. There is no middle ground, but in both cases they are assumed to be lazy.

    The only people saying nigger anymore are the wannabe gangstas.

    It gets really old hearing those outdated stereotypes about the south.

    --
    If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
  178. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    people are pretty nice...southern friendly

    People in NYC are just as nice as Atlanta. The southern charm is just a surface thing - there are still snakes that'll rob you blind, they just act nicer.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  179. Why I came down from the hills by koreth · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I grew up in a semi-rural area in the mountains in California. The closest store was an hour and a half walk away. No food delivery, and there were power outages every winter and spring whenever it rained heavily for a few days in a row and a mudslide knocked out the power lines. Now I live in Silicon Valley, and other than visiting my parents or attending family get-togethers, I'm not heading back any time soon.

    For one thing, food. I'm a foodie and I love variety. In addition to burgers and sandwiches, I am walking distance from Philippine, Indian, Mexican, Vietnamese, Chinese, Japanese, Italian, and even Armenian food. If I want to cook something, I'm less than 10 minutes from Chinese, Mexican, Korean, and Indian supermarkets, as well as a couple of American ones and a fresh-produce store that acts as kind of a permanent farmer's market. Can I get a reliable supply of sumac or fenugreek, a durian, or fresh kaffir lime leaves in rural America?

    When a friend of mine who was going to grad school in Indiana came back here, the first thing she did was force me to take her out to eat because she hadn't been able to find Thai food for six months.

    A lot of midsize towns and cities have cineplexes and shopping malls. Catching "Revenge of the Sith" will be no problem anywhere in the country. But I also like to go see more obscure stuff like "Primer" -- hard enough to find even in a big city with lots of art houses. Short of waiting for the DVDs or pirating them over the Internet, I doubt I'd be able to find most of the cult films I've seen in nearby theaters if I lived in a rural area. (One theater in San Jose used to show Hong Kong action films and anime every Tuesday night, though it has since changed owners and now shows Bollywood musicals.)

    For exercise and socializing, I enjoy ballroom dance (the competition-style variety, more like figure skating than like Grandma and Grandpa at your sister's wedding). I am walking distance from a giant ballroom studio that gets a crowd of several hundred people four nights a week, and on any given Saturday night I'm twenty minutes' drive from at least four other ballroom venues, not to mention more salsa clubs than I can count.

    I like meeting people with all sorts of different backgrounds, and this area gives me that in spades. There is no ethnic majority in San Jose. Three of my last four girlfriends grew up in foreign countries (China, Australia, and Vietnam) which suits me fine -- I like hearing a completely different perspective on things I find familiar and commonplace. There are certainly immigrant communities elsewhere in the US, but only on the coasts, and pretty much only in the major urban areas on the coasts, do you find such a varied mix of people from all over the place, all getting along just fine most of the time.

    Yes, the traffic here can be annoying. But that's why we have telecommuting -- I work from home three out of five days most weeks, so my typical commute time is the 10 seconds it takes me to get from my bedroom to my home office.

    The economy here would have to get really bad before I'd consider moving back to a rural area. Urban areas with their melting-pot cultures and abundance of activities that are only economically viable with a certain population density suit me much, much better.

    1. Re:Why I came down from the hills by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      When a friend of mine who was going to grad school in Indiana came back here, the first thing she did was force me to take her out to eat because she hadn't been able to find Thai food for six months.
      Is Bloomington that bad?

      You cannot get real Thai food in the U.S. like that in Thailand; however, around here there are several good Thai restaurants.
      Local Population Mix: White: 75%; Black: 11.5%; American Indian and Alaska Native: 1%; Asian: 4%; Other race: 5%; Two or more races: 3%; Hispanic/Latino: 9.5%.
      Indian, Mexican, Vietnamese, Chinese, Japanese, Italian, and even French, German, Lebanese restaurants are available here, even though I do not live in the urban paradise which is San Jose. (Does Milpitas have its city hall in a shopping mall? It did when I was last there but I guess the elected officials decided it was too hard to park far away and walk to the office.) It is not necessary to live in CA (or even on a coast) to enjoy different cultures. Your comment:
      There are certainly immigrant communities elsewhere in the US, but only on the coasts, and pretty much only in the major urban areas on the coasts, do you find such a varied mix of people from all over the place, all getting along just fine most of the time.
      sounds like a California comment; I say this as a person who lived in California for the first 21 years of his life (and returns fairly often). I realize how provincial ("Limited in perspective; narrow and self-centered.") are (many of) the people in my birth state. (I was at LAX a week ago and the "natives" from LA were very funny.) I have students and colleagues from all over the world. I suspect that I have been to more foreign countries than have you, even though I do not live in San Jose (motto: world's greatest parking lot after Mesa, AZ.).

  180. Oh, please. by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I grew up in moderately rural Pennsylvania. In my late teens I moved to Florida. I moved to Massachusetts. I moved to New York City. I moved to California. I moved to Montana (and brought everyone in my company with me and bought them houses as a perk. :) I've spent considerable time in India, England, Spain, Japan, Korea (south) and China. Also quite a few tropical islands for a few weeks here and there. I speak fluent Korean, bad Japanese, even worse Chinese, decent Spanish and... uh... moderately understandable American, at least if you don't hail from a ghetto or a rez. :)

    A little more about me (there is actually a point to this, please bear with me): I'm 50 now, and I live about 20 miles from a major indian reservation in Montana. In my various travels, I have met many indians (both native Americans and "India"ns), Aussies, English folk, uncounted large numbers of Chinese, ditto South Americans (serious time in Florida, remember), quite a large number of Japanese, and lots of uprooted east coasters on the left coast and vice versa. Southerners up north, and northerners down south. I've been hanging with a girl from Kansas for about ten years.

    You know who the least respectable of the bunch are? The ones who never left home. That's right. The (American) indians I've met in the cities and the schools, those people are smart and interesting and looking to do something with themselves. The indians I've met here, however, are a whole 'nuther kettle of fish. They live off the dole, they drink like camels (if camels drank alchohol) and they don't do squat worth anything to either their little microcosm or American society at large (unless you count providing justificaiton for major amounts of employment in the FBI, the BIA, and several other large government operations.)

    In sharp contrast, the "furrin" folk I've met have been a delight to interact with, both personally and professionally. They, somehow, managed to drag themselves out of their "own cultures" without complete mental collapse, intolerable levels of angst, or having to scuttle back home to get that welfare/dole/tribal-residency check. I have noticed that in many cases, particularly Japanese and Chinese and Korean folk, they tend to turn their living spaces into little cultural "nodes" in a space made up of American culture. Seems to work very well, too - they have a place to go that is culturally "them", and they don't implode like postal workers.

    Now... you seriously think American indians are so involved with their culture, of all things, that they actually are so mentally disabled that they can't get out of an area about the size of a typical large state's county? If that's truly the case, then we should probably just toss the whole rez idea in the trash - because keeping their culture is too expensive for them.

    Now me, I don't think it is the culture, that is, the indian-ness of them. I think it is the welfare "we will reward you if you stay here" approach that we do to them. I think it is the "we will give you more for each baby you pop out" that we do to them. I think it is the "you can put casinos here, while folks outside the rez can't because mommy and daddy government say so" that we do to them. That's right. I don't blame them. I blame people like you, who, in their haste to be all touchy-feely, don't give minorities and the disadvantaged room to compete on an even playing field because you smother them with "aw gee, baby got a boo-boo? Lemme give you a check for that."

    I say, let them have the land. Let them celebrate whatever they think they have to celebrate. But make them compete on an even playing field with everyone else, and pretty soon, you'll see that they are like everyone else. The potential is there. I've seen it, and I am certain of it. First shoot the social workers. Then shoot the lawyers.

    <mutter>freaking psychobabbling social-worker morons...</mutter>

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now me, I don't think it is the culture, that is, the indian-ness of them. I think it is the welfare "we will reward you if you stay here" approach that we do to them."

      Personally I believe that poverty breeds poverty. If a person grows up in an environment where squalor is the norm, what kind of possiblities do you think they're going to envision for themselves? If everyone around you is on welfare and barely getting by, then how realistic are things like college going to seem?

      The Pine Ridge reservation in South Dakota encomposes the two poorest counties in the entire nation. While I can understand where you're coming from with the welfare argument, do you really think taking money away from them is going to get them more motivated?

    2. Re:Oh, please. by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If everyone around you is on welfare and barely getting by, then how realistic are things like college going to seem?

      The welfare needs to be tapered off to zero, especially the "have a baby, get a dollar" welfare programs. Education must be imposed. Actual jobs created - even if they are artificially created - and those that do not work, like the rest of humanity, get to starve. Those that do low quality work, also get to starve, because they get fired.

      Our government is King Turd of Shit Hill when it comes to artificial job creation; "Pork" is the middle name of darned near every senator and congressman in Washington. Surely they could find a way to put some manufacturing into South Dakota, Montana, Arizona, Harlem, Watts, etc. It beats heck out of sending checks there for the welfare mommies to burn while the welfare daddies hawk drugs on the street corners.

      ...do you really think taking money away from them is going to get them more motivated?

      I absolutely do. There is a big difference in the level of motivation infused into someone who is waiting for this month's check to arrive, as compared to someone who is waiting for this month's bills to arrive. The TV goes off, the lights go off, the heat goes off, the water goes off... all very, very unpleasant. Guess what? Time to go to work!

      The "poor baby" approach doesn't work. We know it doesn't work, there isn't a welfare ghetto in the country that has turned into a half-decent success story without "urban renewal", AKA "we're throwing all you lowlives outa here." And all that does is move the problem somewhere else.

      Give a man a fish, he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish, he can feed his family forever. That's one hoary old saw indeed, but it is sharply on the mark.

      Welfare doesn't work.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    3. Re:Oh, please. by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      Poverty tends to breed poverty, but not always. If poor people feel that a class jump is unattainable, then they will doom themselves to stay poor. If somehow they feel that they can actually get ahead based on their own actions and efforts, then they will. Being surrounded by failure tends to discourage this sort of thing, but in some, it's inspiring. Look at how well so many immigrants do who come to the US looking for the american dream. It sounds corny, but thinking positive actually seems to produce financial results (although I'm not sure about thinking positively in every respect -- sometimes it's not your mental attitude that affects the outcome of your situation -- but sometimes it can mean the differnece between trying something else, or giving up.)

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    4. Re:Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First shoot the social workers. Then shoot the lawyers."

      Hey, this is the US. We have PLENTY of weapons AND ammo. No need to be selective :)

    5. Re:Oh, please. by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like you must live between Billings and Hardin... when I lived in MT (20 years ago now), if you lived on that reservation you could not buy life insurance, because you could get someone offed for a measley five bucks, and it happened fairly often. So everyone there was considered too high-risk to insure.

      And I totally agree with you about the welfare system!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Oh, please. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "If a person grows up in an environment where squalor is the norm, what kind of possiblities do you think they're going to envision for themselves?"

      Uh... The kind of life that immigrants envisioned. The kind of life that Bill Cosby envisioned. The kind of life that I envisioned.

      What a butt-load of condesencion you write.

    7. Re:Oh, please. by stinkpad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I live in Lead, South Dakota, near Deadwood. Have seen firsthand the conditions of the "Native Americans" both on and off the res. I concur. Stop the welfare, and give these people a chance to solve their own problems. These are bright, intelligent people. But, welfare handouts seldom do anything other than enable them to fall into a lifestyle that is destructive and degenerative. Go to the Pine Ridge, the Rosebud, or other reservations and SEE what the conditions are. More "free" money is not going to make the lives of the people better, except perhaps enable some to buy a better quality of booze, and a nicer car to trash. All the damn do gooders who sincerely want to help think that they can solve these problems by giving more money.
      To say or imply that people can come to the United States from various third world repressive shitholes in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe, and other parts of the globe, with no or limited english language skills, immigrate to the United States, and within several years be a functioning succsessful and contributing part of our culture, yet think that the Native Americans somehow need more "help" in order to succeed, is to denigrate their entire race. I am sure that there are some exceptions, as I have met and seen a few of them, but, overall, the results of government handouts is a failure.
      As for the rest of this tread, we moved here to get OUT of a big stinking, crime ridden metropolis of 2+ million. Cost of living is so much lower, and a traffic jam is what happens when a herd of deer of flock of wild turkeys need to cross the road... It was a total quality of life improvement, although if you measure the results in dollars, we are now down near poverty level income. It is amazing, however what so little money can do, when you are debt free and don't have a mortgage or car payment. No way I could have a semi retired lifestyle if I was still in the Denver Metro area. For an equivilent lifestyle, I would need to earn many times what I can get by on here, since I would still be trying to pay off a 200K+ mortgage. Instead, we have 3 houses, with 2 of them rented. We have found that living in a rural community gives us a life, and the big city was slavery, where you worked 60+ hours a week, just to pay for the basics. I have also noticed that many who have never been lived in a rural area think that what you have out here are just a bunch of dumb fsck hicks. I have found that a major portion of the residents are well educated, and a large percentage have moved here from the big cities for the same reasons we did. No, we don't have the opera, 12 screen theaters, 500 restraunts and clubs, and large shopping "mauls". But, that is something we didn't really care about since (because of working 60+ hours a week) we didnt have time for, or enjoy anyway. We have instead, clean air & water, no commute, happy safe children, decent neighbors, almost zero stress, bike and hiking trails, downhill and x-c skiing, hunting and fishing, and the time to enjoy it all.

    8. Re:Oh, please. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      Sounds like you must live between Billings and Hardin

      No, I'm up in the northeast, up by Wolf Point and the like. But the environment is similar; the hospital calls Poplar, the tribal seat, the "knife and gun club." The murder rate is excruciating, and the beatings, muggings and family violence level is astonishing. I won't drive through there at night, neither will most other people around here.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    9. Re:Oh, please. by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      Let me ask you this then: What other options do people have? When unemployment on some reservations reaches past 30% to 75%, it's has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with whether they're on welfare - they're on welfare because they have no jobs and no jobs available for them.

      Don't give me that "pull yourself up by your bootstraps, move away from the rez" stuff, because it doesn't work like that. You can't take care of your family, let alone get a better education to get a better job, because you have no money. More than 50% of all Americans live within 50 miles of their birthplace anyway. How much do you think that has to do with employment and educational opportunities?

      If that's truly the case, then we should probably just toss the whole rez idea in the trash - because keeping their culture is too expensive for them.

      Oh, of course, the original purpose of the reservation was to keep the culture intact (as you implied there) and not the government's attempt to starve them off and kill them all.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    10. Re:Oh, please. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      Let me ask you this then

      Instead of asking, why not read my other posts? Especially since I've already answered this question. :)

      Regarding the why of the reservation system, whatever, it's completely irrelevant. We have to deal with what is here, now. Agonizing over the sins of a bunch of racist white guys long, long gone is stupid. The problem now is how to let these people reach some kind of reasonable potential. They've already got the land, and as I said, I'm all for they should keep it if possible. I was fairly obvious, I think, about saying that I did not think that taking the rez away was what was needed.

      You and I disagree completely on moving out to find work. If you have to, you will. The problem here is that they don't have to. Wefare has turned a bad situation into a bad situation with superglue.

      Again, read my other posts in this thread, please.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    11. Re:Oh, please. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, Poplar, I totally forgot about that one. (Wolf Point, most notable for having an annual temperature range from +114F to -72F.) I'm more familiar with the murders, beatings, muggings, and family violence around Billings/Hardin. My sister lived for a year on "Ambulance Row" in Billings ... it was the main drag between the slum on the SE side of town (kinda the dribblings from Hardin that had flowed northward and stuck there) and the hospital. Any hour of the night, you could see at least one ambulance racing up the street. -- I once attended a convention on the edge of that neighbourhood (emphasis on "hood"), and the hotel made a point of warning people NOT to go out alone after dark, and most definitely not to leave the hotel grounds by yourself at ANY hour of the day or night.

      The common factor here? it's another detritus of the welfare state. And if the dole works so well at helping people rise above poverty, why are there so many consecutive generations still "enjoying" its purported social benefits??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:Oh, please. by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      You and I disagree completely on moving out to find work. If you have to, you will. The problem here is that they don't have to. Wefare has turned a bad situation into a bad situation with superglue.

      Well, I don't think welfare is the agent to blame here. Consider some of the people who move off the rez - a lot of them fail (we'll get to why in a moment), so where are they going to go? Like most people, back to their families (who happen to live on the rez). The people who stay and watch their friends or family leave see only very few "make it" (and some who do "make it" want to come back to the rez to try and help their tribe in multiple ways), and see a lot of them fail - what do they see and think? "Well, if they can't do it, then there is no hope for me."

      From Another Post: The "poor baby" approach doesn't work. We know it doesn't work, there isn't a welfare ghetto in the country that has turned into a half-decent success story without "urban renewal", AKA "we're throwing all you lowlives outa here." And all that does is move the problem somewhere else.

      So first you say that they should move off the rez to find jobs, then you say that moving the problem around doesn't work? Do you have a solution that doesn't contradict itself?

      I think the better question is "Why do these people end up failing?" It has nothing to do with the desire to be on welfare 'cause it's easy. It has more to do with the lack of education, the lack of employment opportunities nearby, and the hopelessness of that situation. (I'd like to hear more about the educational "assistance" programs available to Indian students that you mention in another post - have some more info on that?) I think to say that "they want to be that way" is insulting to say the least, and that you're missing out on some of the larger social forces that prevent people from getting out of that cycle of poverty.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    13. Re:Oh, please. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Of course, none of the people but the American indians you've met have been so completely conquered. I agree with your recipe for rehabilitation. But also must realize that culture is dynamic, and modern reservation culture is a product of both centuries of genocide and the "cleanup" work of welfare and other culturally debilitating effects. You probably also realize that American indians are different from the other people you've met with respect to alcohol: they're biochemically less defended against alcoholism, less equipped to exercise willpower even when they're fortunate enough to overcome their debilitated upbringing. I mention these details are not to discourage a program similar in practical engagement to the one you prescribe - I agree that competition and self-reliance build respect today, just as it did among these tribes before their destruction during our history. But rather these details emphasize the need for these changes. You're an energetic leader in a low-population state that includes lots of American indians with whom you interact. What can *you* do to help build momentum towards their social rehabilitation, besides shutting down sympathetic enablers of their welfare trap?

      BTW, I note that Montana gets $1.87 return on every $1 invested in Federal taxes - sixth most welfared state in the country. Numbers 1-7 have large indian populations, and lots of that welfare is spent in those states on indian behalf, by American taxpayers, to non-indians. How can you help get Montana's economy weaned from its interest in raising needy indians to harvest the Federal welfare that keeps them needy?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  181. Getting back to the topic by jte · · Score: 1

    As part of a rural IT company that has done very well serving SMBs (think even smaller) for the past 5 years, I'm suprised I havn't seen a story like this sooner. In my opinion, the rural U.S. is also a place that is begging for business solutions using FOSS technology by a community that's organized enough to do it. Judging from the comments, most of you are too busy talking shit to think about the topic or your jobs.

  182. Good for U.S. and good for business, bad for techs by gone.fishing · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rural outsourcing would help people living in rural areas get jobs. Because business looks at an areas pay scale before they decide what to offer the tech style jobs will be lower in rural America than in the cities and that will probably be good for business.

    The rural techs would "steal" jobs from their urban counterparts and would cheapen the overall value of technical jobs.

    The truth is there are already a lot of underpaid technical types in rural areas. Today you can consider mechanics technical types and people with these analytical skills do live in rural areas.

    I grew up in a small midwestern town. I left. I left because I like computers and I like being well paid. You don't find many computer jobs in small towns and you don't find hardly any decent paying jobs in small towns.

    Still keeping the jobs in the US is a boon to the country and getting rural areas jobs will help with the chronic unemployment in these towns. But there is nothing to stop these folks from gaining experience and moving to the city in search of better pay! If that happens there will be a larger surplus of us tech types in the city and our pay will slide closer to the rural folks. So for me, perhaps it is bad.

  183. Rural schools by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    I've mostly grown up in the Midwest. I spent a few years in the Mississipi school system, and when we moved to Nebraska, they wanted to move me back a year. And jokes about illiterate farmers just isn't true anymore. They're actually some of the toughest people for education going. As for not a lot of jobs, well it's more that there aren't lots of low-skill jobs like factory work. And yes- illiterates are so rare that we would be shocked to find out somebody couldn't read.

    17- back a grade level? 6 years older? Now that's bad. I know I had a tough first year in Nebraska, but how bad was that kid?

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Rural schools by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 0

      you can't judge the whole state based on one school district. Your parents probably moved there BECAUSE that local area had better schools.

    2. Re:Rural schools by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Actually, my district was about third or fourth out of six for education. There were better and worse, but not by much compared to the Mississipi school system.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  184. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All these jobs going to 19th Century shitholes... and some to India too.

  185. Re:holocaust fake google keywords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it tough seeing through the holes in that pointy white hood?

  186. Yes, it does sound like a good spot by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    It sounds like a good deal for outsourcing.
    You have workers who are:
    A: Educated
    B: Available
    C: Hard working
    D: Not too expensive (ND is near the bottom for living expenses).
    E: Safe. One college student went missing. She was on the state news for months.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  187. Re:holocaust fake google keywords by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 1

    I actually read your links, and I was honestly expecting a lot more from you than a few discrepancies that weren't even seriously examined.

    It also angers me how TV and any dogmatic source of information can set a lot of preconceived notions into people's heads, but if you're serious about fighting dogma than you have to do a lot better than this.

    I want you to start with this and use it as a mantra: "Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." With that in mind, I think you should get your BEST arguments and BEST evidence that would back up your theory. Summarize them, and then ask yourself, "Is my summary of my BEST arguments and BEST evidence enough to even get people to listen to my supporting arguments?"

    If the answer is no, then you better keep looking for better evidence. More importantly, don't rely on your own judgment to answer this question, talk to people and get their feedback, especially those who are most critical because they will teach you the most.

    Lastly, try to get them to criticize the logic or the data supporting your argument rather than audacity of your argument. Let them know that audacity and an indignant attitude proves nothing.

    Please, don't send me any more links regarding this subject. If you want to change my opinion, I want to hear it from you. I believe it's necessary to give an opportunity to be heard, but it's also the speaker's duty to summarize their most compelling arguments.

  188. I am sort of in a 'rural outsourcing' mode by MarkWatson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife and I moved from the beach in San Diego to the mountains of Northern Arizona almost 7 years ago. We find the cost of living to be very much lower here (and with wilderness surrounding us for hiking and picnicking, the standard of living much better).

    We both work fewer hours per week and for usually lower pay, and much less stress. Anyway, it works for us.

    The internet and cheap flat rate long distance makes telecommuting possible, but still not as effective as being on site. I try to spend time on consulting, writing and developing a few (very much niche) software products.

  189. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by jtev · · Score: 1

    That's why you should outsource to the Midwest. We're nice and open about things. If we want you dead, you'll be sure of it. You can take us at face value.

    --
    That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
  190. Currency markets could be driving this... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    With the dollar getting CLOBBERED against foreign currency, it is less and less cost effective to move jobs overseas. I believe that we are nearing the point where it is cheaper and easier to move jobs to more rural locations within the US, where people tend to be willing to work for less money than in urban and/or unionized locations.

    Just a thought...

  191. The Company Behind the Curtain by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Rural Sourcing began pitching its services this summer and can boast of five major customers, including a large telecommunications company, White said. She said the companies haven't given their permission to be named publicly.

    Though I don't have any inside information, I'd bet the unnamed company is Verizon.

    Call up their tech support number and you will hear an American on the other end. Several times, I've talked to someone with a southern accent.

    Most of all, it seems the most amaturish support center I've ever called. 9 problems out of 10, I'll get a completely different answer from each support person I talk to. They seem quite determined to pass the buck, giving me any answer they can make up that will require me to call back. You wouldn't believe how many times I've heard some lame answer, that all the problems will be magically fixed "tomorrow", even when they've gone on for weeks. And, of course, they NEVER fail to mark the issue as CLOSED, when they've never solved anything. This screws up the automated phone system, requiring me to call it a "NEW" issue every time I call in about the same thing.

    If you're wondering about the 10th time out of 10, I'll get the exact same response from 4 different people, but they'll all be COMPLETELY wrong.

    Anyhow, I never understood what was happening there, but this story seems to fit perfectly, and explain the issue.

    Of course, I certainly hope I'm wrong, and Verizon support just happens to be terrible. I'm the last person to advocate outsourcing, so I hope REALLY crappy American support isn't the only alternative.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  192. treaties vs. pillaging by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

    There is a big difference between breaking treaties and military conquest. The U.S. and Canada stole land by breaking treaties with the Natives because they either weren't strong enough militarily or weren't totally lacking in morals to do the genocide BleckyWelcky seems to advocate.

    The basic pattern started with the fledgeling US not recognizing the treaties with the Hurons. They were a huge nation and we made a peace treaty with them and gave them the infamous small pox blankets -- the first use of biological weapons. This travesty let us claim stake to the Ohio Valley and open our way to the Great Lakes and manifest destiny.

    In contrast the Vikings came in and generally kicked ass. When a nation can't fully subjegate a people, they go home or make treaties. Just as the English did with the Scots and the US and Canada did with the First Nations people.

    The Euros, despite being technologically advanced could not compete with the Natives militarily until fairly late in the struggle. Heck, even the Vikings didn't have the stones to conquor North America and abandoned that plan pretty much right away.

    Numerically, it was a different story. The Natives ceded a good deal of their territories to the Europeans at first just to trade. Later, to avoid being wiped out by the sheer number of Europeans flooding into their home. The rub lies in how those treaties were constructed and how they were respected.

    If you go over many of the treaties, it becomes fairly obvious that they were a sham. For Example in the Ojibiway's case, the lawyers getting the indians to sign the treaties and deeds claimed to be travelling by canoe hundreds of miles in a day (carrying a buttload of provisions like desks, china and silverware) The distances they documented in these treaties are a big drive to cover in a single day on paved roads. Signatures were blatently forged on deeded sales.

    It's some really shady paperwork that ceded Native lands to whites. Legally there is a mounting case that much of this stolen land could be repatriated in a court of law. And it is slowly beginning to happen. Now you might down play these documents as old papers, but nobody dismisses the US constitution, Ammendments or Bill of Rights on these grounds and they are generally older.

    You might say this happend a long time ago to people who are dead. Regardless, the descendants of these actions have to live with the consequences and while the whites are living the lush life, Native lives are excluded from this "melting pot" exploited and forced to live in third world poverty. Outcasts in their own native land.

    I have spent a bit of time in the North setting up networks for remote fly-in communities. They have some wicked bandwidth and some smart, talented people. Many bands have blatently turned down offers from M$ for free software because they say they don't need Bill Gates.

    As far a shrewd traders, the Oji-Cree could teach a Wall Street player a thing or two. Additionally, they have autonomy and could leapfrog the industrial age to be a dominant nation in the information age. Still that is far off. Places like Pikangikum still claim the highest suicide rate in the world and they are ironically only a few miles from the largest gold reserve in the world. It's a long road, but the native people are a strong underdog.

    1. Re:treaties vs. pillaging by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Right, and those treaties were the only treaties ever broken during that era.

      [/sarcasm]

      My point was that shit hit the fan all the time back then. The world was being explored, civilizations were being conquered, and territories were being claimed. Just because the Indians were steam rolled doesn't mean we should feel sorry for them or that they are entitled to rewards they didn't earn. If they want their land back, they can buy it from me at market rate ... and they can be subject to the same laws of the USA that I am.

      Do you see descendants of the original colonies whining about the various British massacres?

    2. Re:treaties vs. pillaging by Reziac · · Score: 1

      "Do you see descendants of the original colonies whining about the various British massacres? "

      No, but obviously, we should!! After all, it works for everybody else...

      "Title to every parcel of land ultimately goes back to an act of violence." -- Jack Vance

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  193. nope, not quite. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    AS i understand it, its very dense, but also when it heats up, it abalates instead of melting. so when the pointy tip of the bullett hits a target, istead of the point getting mushy with heat, the surface aabaltes away and it gets sharper, thus keeping up with the penetrating plans. the fact that its denser than hel helps too.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  194. What a joke by arfuni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you really think of any of these call centers and server farms are going to stay in the sticks? This has been happening for years. Companies frequently take advantage of tax and free money perks and move on when the new VP or the like convinces enough shareholders or the CEO that slightly more profit could be made elsewhere and then again somewhere and then again somewhere... you get the point. Just ask Kalispell City. Four million in government incentives down the drain, an expensive upgraded infrastructure that no one is going to use, trashed wilderness from the sprawl that popped up and was abandoned, etc.

    1. Re:What a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. That was Stream, right? They got a bunch of corporate welfare in the form of tax breaks, then in a year or two they pulled out and moved on to India.

  195. Fairtax by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    This is one of the major reasons behind Fairtax

    Talk how you will, it'll eliminate the "tax advantage" to outsourcing jobs.

    Reducing the regulatory expenses to opening/operating a business would help too. I'm not talking about eliminating OSHA, but there are lots of spots that governmental interferance increases the cost of doing business.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  196. No, thank you. by foo+fighter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The governments of small midwestern states have been pimping out their citizens to businesses as people who will work long and hard without complaining for minimum wage and few benefits. They turn around and tell those citizens they are working hard to bring quality, high-paying jobs.

    The citizens of these states, especially the "young" people between 18 and 35, have figured this out and are turning their backs on the government of their homes. The past decade has been characterized by a massive outmigration from rural states to Top 50 metropolises. It's a literal brain drain for the communities they leave.

    The community in which I live has a special economic development fund that has been an unmitigated disaster, taking tax dollars from our sales tax and giving it to companies who promise to bring in a certain amount of new jobs. There has been, in practice, no accountability and the jobs have sucked. Firms have closed overnight, taking millions of tax dollars with them and leaving hundreds of citizens unemployed with back pay due they'll never see.

    The largest employers in this village of ~40,000 people are (besides the air force base, hospital and school district) a technical help desk contractor, a hotel reservation phone pool, a airline reservation phone pool, an insurance agency phone pool, and an adult vocational training center. Despite the "success" of most of these businesses starting within the last 5 years, the median wage has stayed flat at around $25,000.

    There are some bright spots. A home that costs ~$150,000 dollars here would set you back ~$2,000,000 in Silicon Valley. Our arts culture here is very strong thanks to the local university, including our excellent volunteer symphony orchestra. I guess that's about it.

    Crime isn't low because of the meth epidemic. I have a buddy on the county's drug enforcement squad and the stories he can tell would make for a terrific Al Pacino movie. Except for our housing costs, our cost of living is comparable to the rest of the nation but the fresh produce isn't as fresh nor as diverse.

    Now a Super Wal*Mart is scheduled to open next year and our "civic leaders" are touting this as another economic development success. The truth is the citizens are tired of working two or three jobs to get in 40 hours a week and enough of a paycheck to support three kids in their 70's era trailer or trashy $600/month apartment.

    I'm lucky to have a great federal government job as a systems administrator. My wife is a dental hygienist with an almost unbelievably fantastic work and pay schedule. We are very lucky.

    But to those who would pimp out my neighbors or "outsource" more shitty jobs to communities like this I say go to hell. If the Indians or Chinese or Mexicans will take this shit they are welcome to it. That's not flamebait or nationalism or anything of the sort. It's the truth.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:No, thank you. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      It's a literal brain drain for the communities they leave.

      Really? There's literally brain matter going down the drain?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  197. Re:Never under estimate the poverty of the 3rd wor by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Remember the saying,

    The best government is rule by a dictator (when the dictator is good), but is also the worst when corrupt.

    Democracy, is merely mediocre. In either case.

    And we're not the biggest country. Canada has more land-mass than we do. We're the MOST POWERFUL COUNTRY IN THE WORLD ;)

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  198. If your going to compare education... by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 1

    ...then wouldn't college degrees be a better metric as far as finding employable people?

    Here's the top 20 from the latest US census.

    1. Washington, D.C. - 44.4%
    2. Maryland - 37.6%
    3. Colorado - 35.7%
    4. Virginia - 34.6%
    5. Massachusetts - 34.3%
    6. Connecticut - 32.6%
    7. New Jersey - 31.4%
    8. Vermont - 30.8%
    9. Minnesota - 30.5%
    10. New Hampshire - 30.1%
    11. Rhode Island - 30.1%
    12. Delaware - 29.5%
    13. Kansas - 29.1%
    14. New York - 28.8%
    15. Washington - 28.3%
    16. California - 27.9%
    17. Illinois - 27.3%
    18. Nebraska - 27.1%
    19. Oregon - 27.1%
    20. Utah - 26.8%

  199. Former Democrat here that totally agrees with you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm also tired of all the rural America mocking the bigoted geekdom here pukes out of their keyboards. As someone who grew up in rural america, where the keys could be left in my car, my house could remain unlocked, where you know and like your neighbors, the list goes on and on,.... And have also lived in the city, where the convenience of transit, shopping, and "culture" is readily available, I can't for the life of me figure out why someone would be so quick to bash his/her fellow American as some out of touch Redneck. Really, this is all so tiring. The whole idea of technology to me is to liberate people from these old worn out ideas of centralization. Cities are great, but I'll take raising my family in rural America any day. Please don't mock me for wanting this. And oh yeah, if Rural Sourcing Takes off, which I think it will, isn't that a good thing for all of us Americans?

  200. Your very short list of grievences... by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 1

    You barely listed anything. Is this all you have?

    1. Leave our guns alone.

    (You mean assault weapons, because I know you're not talking about hunting rifles and hand guns. HOWEVER, I'll give this to you ANYWAY because I support ALL of the constitutional amendments.)

    2. Let us buy trucks without airbags.
    (I give you that. No arguments here.)

    3. Stop destroying our jobs because you want cheaper vacations. I'm thinking of Slick Willie and his war on mining, logging and ranching.

    (WHICH is done on FEDERAL LAND. Are you saying Slick Willie was interfering with your right to FEDERAL HANDOUTS??? BTW, We both know the "cheaper vacation" reason is BS.)

    4. Stop patronizing us.

    (Sure, when you stop painting Californians and New Yorkers what you paint them... )

    5. And above all, don't call us a bunch of uneducated bible-thumpers

    (Sort of redundant with the last one, eh?)

    MY POINT

    For a guy who's as well educated and successful as yourself, you make a pretty shitty list as to how Urban Democrats have infiltrated into your lives. Would you like to take some time to rethink your position on the subject, or will you be working on a revised list with a lot more substance?

    PS, I'm not a Democrat so don't bother attacking my political affiliation, but I am urbanite/suburbanite so feel free to attack where I live (Northern NJ). ...but serious, I hope you reply with an enchanced list or you conceed that no one is "invading in your lives". Most of all, don't give me any bullshit.

    1. Re:Your very short list of grievences... by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      From the top down;
      I do mean hunting rifles. Assault weapons are illegal and have been since 1933. The so-called assault weapons are semi-auto (pull trigger for every single shot.) The "assault weapons ban" banned semi-automatics based on cosmetics. (It looks military, it must be military.) Personally, I am partial to Ruger M-77s, but some people like the stamped metal and plastic look.

      We agree on airbags, so-so idea poorly done, bad outcome. Agreement is possible, an encouraging sign.

      The mining rules apply on Federal AND Private land. The EPA doesn't care. And on the subject of private land, when the government owns 60-80% of the land, and will not sell, your ability to have an economy at all, much less grow it, is pretty constrained. Fortunately, I expect that as the Social Security problems really start to hit, someone will decide to sell much of it off to fund the retirement checks. Then maybe we'll stop building houses on the good farmland that was homesteaded in the 1900s, and build them on the rockpiles that aren't good for anything else. But now, farmland is all you can buy, because Sam won't sell the rockpiles.

      As for logging, in Washington State, the Government, powered by the environmentalist base in Seattle, now effectively controls all land within 300 feet of water. You have to get permission to cut a tree in that band around a stream, or face prosecution. You still get to pay taxes on it though. But we wouldn't want to a vacationing Seattleite to see a stump now, would we?

      I used to live in the Columbia Gorge. The Columbia Gorge Commission is an unelected body based in Portland that was granted, by Federal Law, power to control all scenic aspects of the Gorge from about Maryhill to just outside of Portland, about 120 miles of river. If you live in their zone of control, you have to get permission to paint your house. And they have been known to say no.

      As for the patronizing, just after the election a comment from some Kerry supporter was "All they do out there is pray, go to Walmart, and pray some more." That sounds pretty patronizing to me. And it has been bugging me for a few days. Do you NorthEast urbanites really have that little noton of what is happening out here, or even in Ohio?

      I have another fine example of intruding big city ethics where they don't fit. Seattle decided that it was better to let coyotes eat livestock than to use traps to kill the coyotes. Their sensibilites are more important than our livelihoods you see. (I'm speaking collectively here, my job is at a chemical plant.) But, the law also banned mole and gopher traps. And the moles are a major problem on the West Side. So they started tearing up the suburban lawns, and "threatening property values". That was the actual phrase they used when they tried to repeal just the mole trap part of the ban. That didn't fly in the legislature, so the governor decided he wouldn't enforce the law on the West Side. We are supposed to still follow it though.

      The environmentalists also want to rip out four hydro dams on the Snake River so the fish can be free. Besides the 3,000 MW of power lost, it would end barge shipping to Lewiston, the main way grain from the Palouse and Camas Prairie areas get to market. And the irrigation would pretty much stop too, so there is another bunch of farmers probably going broke.

      Judging from the bad temper on your part, I must have hit close to heart. A long involved list of how people whose idea of nature is limited to the Disney view are having adverse effects on the countryside is not going to fit in a slashdot reply. And when our own Senator Patty Murray (who is from Seattle) is on record saying we rural dwellers should give up jobs at $14-$20 an hour and take jobs in Eco-tourism (minimum wage AND seasonal to boot), one gets to feeling a bit persecuted.

      I don't try to boss people from New Jersey around, and wouldn't dream of telling you how to solve your bear problem. (I may giggle a bit, but I'm sure you'll figure it out in the end.) And I expect the same consideration from you.

    2. Re:Your very short list of grievences... by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 1

      Don't you feel better having made your point and backing it up with specifics?

      To be honest, I can't think much of anything you've said that I really disagree with, and the only reason I replied was because your post came off as a juvenile diatribe against liberals, rather than a legitimate list of grievances.

      IE, You sounded like a whining liberal who missed the irony of your actions.

      To sum up: Try to spend more time presenting your legitimate claims of government interference (zealous enviromental regulation), and avoid the measly and petty grievences (Ban on gun decorations, manditory air-bags, having your demographic insults, and having your demographic insulted) sic.

      You'll come off 1000x more intelligent and people will want to listen to you if you lay off complaining about petty shit.

      Finally, I hate it when the government interferes with anybody's life, and as long as your claims are legitimate, you'll have my ear and support.

  201. Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll come.. probably moving in between you and work making your commute longer and longer and longer...

  202. damn funny stuff by Z3nN3rd · · Score: 1

    Wow. There is some seriously funny stuff on here. Back to topic: 1. Would you move to the boondocks at a pay cut to just have a decent job? 2. What are good jobs to outsource if it were up to you? 3. Crunchy or smooth peanut butter? It seems to me that the internet is helping us all realize an early pipe dream: work anywhere. I know, damn, I didn't mean Bangladesh (that's where my job went and let me move to the BFE). However, I must admit I don't miss rush hour or my kids recitals anymore. I do miss good radio and more than a handful of restaurants. However, I have gotten way better at CS and DoD and Call of Duty. Peace. Out. Gotta go kill some (fill in appropriate group you hate here. I'm with you my brother!)

  203. Oh yeah, Southern California... by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

    Yeah, except that water is 55 degs, maybe 58 in the summer, so watch yourself turn blue without a wetsuit. And the locals better know you if you surf or else your car or yourself will not make it out too well. From Zuma to Santa Barbara, there's only two weeks max out of the year where it's warm enough to go to the beach (let alone the water) without a jacket. And the water generally sucks in many places (especially in the winter rains) due to the pollution.

    Then, there's "it only takes two hours to go from the beach to the snow". Yeah, two hours one way (half a day on the road both ways at the very least) to go ANYWHERE in the most miserable, congested, God forsaken freeway system on the planet. Can't do anything locally, as it's either nothing but private property (read oceans of housing tracts) or public land that's illegal to do anything but look at it (but now requires a parking placard to stop to look at it for federal forests). I hardly go out of town anymore because as soon as I go onto the 101 parking lot, I can feel my life slip away. To go to more interesting places (Pismo (ATVs), Tahoe, Big Sur, Yosemite, LV), it's a multiday experience.

    Also, don't forget this is the People's Republic of Kalifornia, where environmentalists are trying their best to make every human activity illegal except for a few EXTREMELY CROWDED areas (one of a million examples, go to Pismo (Oceano) and fly a kite, see you get fined. Flying parafoils in Oxnard was made illegal, etc.). Never mind the utter hypocracy as they too travel in gas sucking cars and dwell in former wildlife habitat, your ATV is destroying the planet... At any rate, you'll soon have to travel to another state to to actually DO something.

    So yeah, come to SoCal if you like surfing, but get to know the locals first. That's ALL you'll be doing so you better like it, or else learn to love the freeway and spend the rest of your life on it. And yes, I've lived in Ventura County 18 years... So why was SoCal better again?

  204. Montana by lannocc · · Score: 1

    Hey, I think you're the first user on slashdot I've seen that says they're in Montana. I moved to Billings from Seattle two years ago, and it's always refreshing to meet other similary-minded people in this state.

    1. Re:Montana by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Hi. :-)

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  205. Outsource to Okla. It's Like a 3rd World Country by Ranger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tulsa, Oklahoma is a call center mecca. There are 80 plus call centers here. Some are small but most employ hundreds. It's about the only thing left after all the other industries imploded (oil, aviation, telecommunications). These jobs typically pay $8-$10/hr which isn't a bad wage for someone with only a high school education. The work itself is another matter.

    They are cubicle sweathshops. Poor training coupled with the most micromanaged industry in the known Universe creates a highly stressed work environment where employment is measured in months. Turnover is high but they can always turn around and get a job at another call center for a few more months. With so many people out of work from formerly high paying jobs they have a ready supply of desperate workers.

    The best selling point for outsourcing to Oklahoma is that it's like an emerging third world country, but here at home. It's mostly rural with pockets of high technology. The cost of living is low. It's in the central time zone so they only have to get up an hour earlier to take calls from the East coast and stay two hours later to take calls from the West coast. And most people have a high school education. And best of all they speak English even if it has an Okie twang to it.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  206. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Well, I've had plenty of friends from other places come visit me. One in particular, from New Hampshire comes often. She goes on and on about how much nicer people are here...and let me tell ya, she stands out with her accent and all.

    People in the south are nice to people...you just have to act like a nice person. They'll be the first to give you the shirt off their back if you're a nice person. If you come and act superior, or act an ass....they'll also be the first to kick your ass.

    That's what you get from real people. Sure, I'm talking in generalites....there are jerks all over the world...and it is no different here. But, in general, I've found that compared to the extremes in the country...the NE and the West...people here are generally nicer, polite and more respectful than most others. If not, why is it so many from up north want to move here? It can't just be the warmer weather. The live down here is generally more relaxed...better food...and the zest for life is better. We like to work hard and party hard...and enjoy each other more. I was amazed when I lived in Tucson. Down here...when you walk and catch someone's eyes...you smile and generally say hello...etc. When out there I'd do that...they'd actually sometimes have a scowl on their face and ask "what do you want?" That amazed me. I find you can get further in life it you 'nice' people to death rather than be immediately defensive and spiteful...

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  207. umm ... by tofupup · · Score: 1

    "You know who the least respectable of the bunch are?"
    the people who don't pay rent ...
    so when are you going to start paying up pilgrim ...
    i am sure we start seeing some real potential when they all can afford and ivy league education.

    justice isn't something just anyone can afford
    - trading crime for crime : ani d.

    1. Re:umm ... by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      i am sure we start seeing some real potential when they all can afford and ivy league education.

      I live near the Assineboyne and Sioux reservation. Now, I can't speak for other tribes, but these indians have schooling available to them for free. Primary, secondary and yes indeed, college. Ivy league placement? That would depend upon grades achieved. The head of the tribes here the last time I had any dealings with them (it's been about a decade, though) had a master's in one thing, and a PhD in another. I don't remember what, but they were reasonable specializations for someone in a position not unlike a hospital administrator. Running a reservation is no minor undertaking. He was stone awesome to talk to, and he tried really hard to do some good things for those people.

      You were assuming, I think, that educational opportunities are not available to indians. Not so. When you apply the standards of American poor to American indian reservation residents, you're making a (natural) mistake because indian life typically looks like a very poor life. But these people have educational assistance programs available to them that you would be most grateful to get. Do they take advantage of them? Typically, no. But that is a choice, not a lack of opportunity.

      One problem is that many simply never try to take advantage of these programs. Why leave to go study when you can stay home, get free money, and drink and screw like bunnies? Another is problem is that many of those who do manage to wander off the reservation come right back, often without finishing school. If they need glasses, or if they get pregnant, if they need dental work, any little medical bump and fall they might have, or if things aren't going quite right -- then they "run home to mama" where life is 100% free and there is no need to face the world. You can hardly blame them; most people would probably do the same. But the long-term results of these womb-seeking behaviours are already known.

      You asked when "I was going to start paying up." Funny you should ask. The good news (sort of) is that we're all already paying up. The US government funds these support programs, and of course, we know where the US government gets its money, don't we?

      But more specifically, I have reached out in their general direction. My company designed and built a graphics adaptor, and the Assineboyne and Sioux at the time had two wholly-indian companies, Western Electronics and A and S Industries. A and S were mainly making netting for the gulf war, and Western Electronics was making various small electronic gismos. We had them build the adaptor, which was an outboard unit for the early Amiga computers, so it required a case. Western Electronics did the board, A and S did the casing. Everything went swimmingly until there were some production problems; then I learned, a little late in the game, that business law mutates rather completely going from on-rez to off-rez and vice-versa, contracts or no contracts. Feathers flew, but little was accomplished. I wouldn't do business with them again unless things are changed so they have to comply with the same set of laws that the rest of us do. We are talking about business worth under a million bucks, but not way under. To me, that's real money. To them, probably not, but then again, I'm not here to live up to their expectations, to mangle a popular 60's quote.

      As far as I am concerned, right now if I had an opportunity to do business with an indian or an indian business, it would have to be based off the reservation so the playing field is level. But I'd still be willing. They're just as smart and capable as the rest of us are.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  208. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by killjoe · · Score: 1

    Here let me convey to you a conversation that happend to me.

    "You mexican?"
    Nope
    "Puerto Rican?"
    Nope
    "Well what are ye then?"
    (Me getting frustrated) "Eskimo!"
    "Shit I thought them eskimos was white!"

    As for "so many people wanting to move there" unless you live in Florida I'd say not too many. Tell me when your population gets close to NY, NJ, CA, or IL and then I'll believe you.

    Look I am not saying you are not nice, maybe you are but my experience has been that people in the south treat you according to how you look and sound espcially in the small towns. I have walked into bars and stopped all conversation. Yes it actually happened.

    I don't know where you live but the absolute worst place was Oklahoma. I wouldn't live there again no matter what you offered me. What a shithole, redneck, stifling state that one is.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  209. Tippi Tai on My Capatown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ain't come one, but many tine tanies

  210. Everyone is forgetting the #1 rule of outsourcing. by pappy97 · · Score: 1

    Here is the thing:

    If outsourcing costs you a job, you hate it.

    If outsourcing means you get a job or you make money off it, you love it.

    So it doesn't matter if the outsourcing is to Mumbai or Altus, Arkansas. Any techie-type in Silicon Valley will be pissed if they let go in favor of a guy who can be hired for less money. Period.

  211. A Native American asks "oh really"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We're better off?

    That sure seems to be what your post suggests. Short of cloning, I don't see how our people won't be all but extinct in a hundred years or so. And I don't know what languages you speak; I speak English and Spanish. My "ancient tribal languages" exist on reel-to-reel in some anthropologist's office.

    Sure there are those of us who are fortunate enough to have gotten off the rez. Hell some of us even work in IT and goody, our company gets kudos for checking off a little box on their diversity paperwork. And your co-workers tell you how much they liked Dances With Wolves or think the rez is some aboreal hippie paradise.

    I doubt many companies will be outsourcing their IT work to the rez.

    The worst isn't behind us. We're pretty much gone as a people. Want to know something about the Lemhi-Shoshone fifty years from now? Better go web surfing (or the equivalent) or to a museum. There won't be anyone with enough blood quantum to be considered an American Indian.

    If you marry someone from another nation, the goverment won't recognize your children as being Native American anymore if their blood quantum isn't high enough, even if 3/4 of their grandparents are full-blooded Indians but from different nations. Why should the BIA (Bureau of Indian Affairs) get to decide who are salmon eaters and who are not? Shouldn't we decide? Shouldn't our children be considered BOTH their parents' people?

    Most of us are forgotten, still barely scraping by on the rez. You don't have to travel to the third world to see soul-crushing poverty - just visit a rez without a giant casino. You think the racism is gone? Bullshit. Even shitty jobs are hard to come by - on or off the rez. But there sure are plenty of liquor stores and too many of us are downbeaten drunks.

    If you happen to live along a major interstate, then goody for you. Some development company might choose to build a casino. That's if your council isn't greedy and shortsighted enough to string developers along. If the angry infighting doesn't make it impossible to get the project underway. If you grease enough wheels in the state government and get some well-connected lobbyist to bribe enough of your state delegation to help the project along. If some asshat (casino developer, some other paleface carpetbagger, or an Uncle Tom Indian) doesn't rip you off by offering to buy your interest in future casino money for pennies on the dollar while you writhe in poverty.

    You're right that the massacres and cultural destruction won't happen to us anymore. Those jobs have been done. There aren't any values and traditions to revive. And I don't know where you're going to find anyone "Indian enough" to repopulate the land area of US of A to the hundred million or so who lived here before Columbus arrived, much less eclipse it. There are only 2.4 million of us left in all the US states and territories, roughly 2.4% of those living 512 years ago.

    If you're Native American then you're a naive, naive little urban Indian. If not, then you still don't know what the crap you're talking about.

    For the record, there isn't any fucking hospital on my rez. There's a clinic. God help you if you get sick, shot or have a heart attack.

    Now when a native child gets sick, the father and the medicine man chant to the Great Spirit. Or they do until the mother gets pissed off and makes him take the child to the reservation hospital. Usually the child recovers fully.

    Chanting to the Great Spirit with the Medicine Man? WTF? You've been watching too much Walker: Texas Ranger. Native Americans have an infant mortality rate over twice that of whites.

    Even if you have an IHS (Indian Health Service) clinic or hospital nearby, which less than 480,000 of us do, unless your nation is federally recognized you can forget IHS period. 1/3 of Native Americans have no health coverage at all, not even Medicaid. Horses and cattle get better health care than the people on my rez.

  212. Not much better in Toronto, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that most of the big IT companies (and many smaller ones) like to locate their offices in the burbs. When I moved here almost two decades ago, I found the Annex neighbourhood close to downtown much to my liking. Since my specialty at the time was programming close to the metal (mainly C and assembler, I had experience with half a dozen machine architectures), I kept finding myself being steered towards job openings in the suburbs.

    By '98, I had had it with the excruciating loneliness of the long commutes to offices in the middle of nowhere. Quite a few of these places qualified as male ghettoes in which there would always be a few guys who presumed that I would share their sexist attitudes simply because I'm also male. In the late 90's, there were number of outfits designing network gear that were crying out for talent and offering top dollar on tor.jobs from places such as Mississauga, Markham and even Kanata (ex-urb close to Ottawa), and guess who decided that he'd rather try to re-invent himself as a free-lance webmonkey downtown.

    I don't have a car. I don't want a car. If the system requires me to make trade-offs over wasting excessive amounts of differing types of non-renewable resources including my time just for a daily commute, then the system is broken.

  213. Misleading Stats. by beakburke · · Score: 1
    Because the degrees follow the jobs, not vice versa. So ND and IA probably actually graduate a very high percentage of their students (both HS and college) but I'd bet that most of them leave the state since neither state has a top 50 population center. (MN-MPLS, CO-Denver, Illinois-Chicago)

    The largest town in ND is Fargo, populatio of 90k. If you include the whole metro area I think its closer to 160k. But that's why Iowa and ND would struggle retaining younger people. Sure some people enjoy smaller towns and rural areas, but you would loose everyone who wants to live in a big city. Sure Fargo and Cedar Rapids or Ames will grow, but most of the truly small towns keep shrinking.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  214. The income myth by beakburke · · Score: 1
    The problem with income is that you have to control for the correlation between income and motivated parents, income and school funding, income and....

    It's not that income explains education (if it did, why are the kids of immigrants so successful?), it's that income has a positive correlation with traits that DO lead to better education. Or rather parents with high incomes tend to care about thier kids education, they are both more likely to be involved and they can elect to move if they feel their child's school isn't doing a good job.

    It's true that vouchers "take money away from public schools" but they would also be taking away students too. Remember, most states have a funding formula that awards on a per student basis, but all the local funding is usually not distributed that way, it's a simple property tax or sales tax etc. I don't think that private schools should get that money (or have the tax authority to take it) The suggestion AFAIK, is for vouchers to only be a fraction of the "per student" spending. Thus the district is out one student, but only half their funding for that student. How is this bad for the district?

    If you wanted to prove of disprove this, try it in the worst district (ie a place with NOTHING to loose and everything to gain).

    Bottom line, if the kids don't care and the parents don't care, then no amount of funding is going to result in an educated student. Funding (at least to some extent) is a necessary but not sufficent condition for education. Eventually you reach a point where additional funding hits diminishing returns and eventually near zero returns on the dollar. Why not at least let the poor parents and kids who CARE about their education have a chance at a good school? Are you "leaving kids behind"? Sure, but almost all of them wouldn't have been educated under the current system either.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    1. Re:The income myth by HanzoSpam · · Score: 1

      Bottom line, if the kids don't care and the parents don't care, then no amount of funding is going to result in an educated student. Funding (at least to some extent) is a necessary but not sufficent condition for education. Eventually you reach a point where additional funding hits diminishing returns and eventually near zero returns on the dollar. Why not at least let the poor parents and kids who CARE about their education have a chance at a good school? Are you "leaving kids behind"? Sure, but almost all of them wouldn't have been educated under the current system either.

      Finally, someone who gets it!

      Thank you!

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    2. Re:The income myth by pnuema · · Score: 1
      I don't think it is acceptable to leave anyone behind. Just becasue a child is poor and his parents happen to be assholes doesn't mean that he isn't deserving of our help and attention.

      In response to the grandparent...

      Let's follow you logic through. Let's say through vouchers you reduce the population of a school by 10%, but because vouchers only take part of the money away, that funding decreases by 5%. Does a ten percent drop in students mean that building maintenance is 10% less? Can you lay off 10% of your teachers? Anyone that shops at Sams can tell you that the price per unit goes down the more units you have. They can also tell you that if you buy the Tub O Peanut Butter, and the Jar O Peanut Butter which is half the size of the Tub, the price isn't 50% less. So a 10% reduction in students does not automatically translate to a 10% reduction in costs.

      Finally, someone who gets it!

      Please don't confuse the fact that I disagree with you with misunderstanding the situation. I don't think it is acceptable to write off any of America's children, and the fact that you do proves to me that you, like most other neocons I've met, are a dick.

  215. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I live in Arkansas, I have been to New York and, I have to tell you, Your right, New Yorkers are friendly. The ones I have met anyways. The Southern charm that most people think of is really just politeness, it has nothing to do with friendliness as it sometimes gets mistaken. I think the reason is that politeness is just part of the tradition here. Its similar to the Japanese with their politeness if your familiar with that. Its just a defacto standard that people use in their day to day interactions. Of course, in recent years, things are starting to change, especially with the younger generation.

  216. Christian Cowards and Anonymous Cowards by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    Among the first things the priests do when they Christianize a region is convince the "leaders" such as you describe, to replace single combat (or any non-verbal fair contest between individuals) as the last resort in dispute processing with some sort of mob rule. That's how the leaders, who apparently rule by "divine right" or some nonsense can get away with the behavior you describe. Otherwise they would have their heads handed to them in very short order.

    While this is supposed to minimize bloodshed as the last resort in dispute processing, what it actually does is result in, first, bloodfeud and then mass warfare.

    Sadam Hussien, for example, challenged George Bush to a duel before Bush committed US troops to Iraq.

    Bush of course didn't even have to decline.

    I'm sure you, an anymous coward, approve of Bush's course of action, resulting in 100,000 Iraqi deaths and 1000 US deaths for mendacious objectives, regardless of what you will now claim with equal mendacity. I mean after all -- you can say anything and get away with it no matter what you have said elsewhere or will say in the future.

    These are the bad old days.

    1. Re:Christian Cowards and Anonymous Cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that one on one combat must be why so many stone forts were built in pre-Christian Ireland, and it is common knowledge that Alexander the Great conquered Persia all by himself. Scipio did not need his Roman legions. He and Hannibal just met up in Carthage and resolved the entire issue of Mediterranean supremacy in single combat.

      As for Saddam, you are off topic, but I am sure he won all those one on one combat offers from Kuwaiti and Kurdish leaders.

      Rural outsourcing -> Clearances -> Iraq. Yes, it's all so clear now. If it weren't for evil Christianity and the deplorable non-tribalism of the modern world, Bush and Saddam would have had their high noon shootout in Vienna. We could all be living happily in an economically secure and peaceful world, just like ancient Greece and Rome.

      (Baldrson, perhaps you should consider posting as an anonymous coward when wander into the far reaches of La La Land.)

  217. Tam, my man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And Cali and NY do have pretty high standards, if you stay out of the cities..."

    Tam, go out to western new york, just east of buffalo.

    You know how we make fun of the rural south for being a bunch of rednecks with sheriffs to hassle people travelling by? Well, that's kind of an old story, and is mostly not truth these days.

    However, western new york is actually like that even today. New York, once you get out of the city is as backward a place as you can imagine.

    1. Re:Tam, my man by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      I live in upstate NY (finger lakes), I know what it is like here.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  218. getting market value for stolen goods by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

    The point of treaties vs. pillaging post is that a big chunk of land was stolen from natives through either broken treaties or largely through fraudulent land deals.

    If you had a car that you bought from someone who bought it from someone who stole it and forged a title for it, you would more likely be looking at a charge of possessing stolen goods rather than market value for the car.

    I am not claiming that any remaining Huron descendants are going to get back the Ohio Valley, however there are big chunks of Ontario, Minnesota and other places that were stolen through forged deeds. Those should go back to their rightful owners -- the autonomous Nations from whom they were stolen.

  219. rural American vs Slashdotter by kwoff · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'd take a stereotypical rural American over a stereotypical Slashdotter. I come from a very rural area in the midwest, yet I have an advanced degree in physics and program at a UN organization. So I'd like to extend my middle finger to all you insecure, socially-challenged Slashdot weenies who have nothing better to do than snort at how people talk.

  220. Re:holocaust fake google keywords by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

    The only fake in the holocaust was that it was just 6 million jews... there were over 12 million people put to death in the Nazi death camps --the other 6 million+ were Slavs, Catholics, homosexuals, capitalists, communists, gypsies....

    The number six million is a vast understatement.

  221. Europe != Middle East/Persia by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    There are lots of cultures that weren't Christian outside of northern and western Europe and yes they were a lot further along the road toward mass warfare earlier for obvious reasons. Religions from that region still dominate us. The pre-Christian cultural adaptations to mass warfare in northern and western Europe were primarily a response to these other cultures rooted in the middle east hence the Mediterranean -- the Roman Empire being the most conspicuous.

    As for Kuwaiti and Kurdish leaders being unable to take out Saddam with fair contest between individuals -- of course Saddam invoked single combat when it suited him and abjured it when it didn't. You didn't think I was imply Saddam Hussein was genuinely acting as though he were a pre-Christian northern European as opposed to simply manipulating that mythlogy for political purposes did you?

    And you still haven't addressed the fundamental statement -- which still stands -- as to the way clan structures in India enable their programmers to reproduce without anywhere near the costs imposed on US programmers -- even rural US programmers. Every one of the evils of "the bad old days" should be equally applicable to India if your view of clan structures were true across the board. They aren't. There are conditions under which they can be made workable and conditions underwhich they are unworkable.

  222. Why are you an anonymous coward? by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    (Baldrson, perhaps you should consider posting as an anonymous coward when wander into the far reaches of La La Land.)

    Look, anonymous coward, if you think your insult-laden "arguments" can stand up to scrutiny the why don't you stand behind them?

    Come out the closet with you libelous characterizations of my statements. Identify yourself.

    1. Re:Why are you an anonymous coward? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you still haven't addressed the fundamental statement -- which still stands -- as to the way clan structures in India enable their programmers to reproduce without anywhere near the costs imposed on US programmers -- even rural US programmers.


      Please excuse me while I die of laughter.

      I suppose you don't live in India. If you did, you might know that regions in which clan/tribal systems are strongest suffer from the greatest amounts of intra-clan violence, clan on clan violence, and sectarian violence. What do you think India is? A vacation spot filled with people sitting in peaceful lotus poses where you can feel bad about the poor? Or perhaps you think the caste and tribal systems than modern India has worked hard to destroy somehow encouraged upward mobility.

      Perhaps if you explained your 'programming gets passed down through clans' thesis, I might bother to address it. It is not prima facie, so I will treat it like I treat the ravings of any other lunatic. Low programming cost in India is due to lower cost of living, which itself is due to the massive size of India's labor force. 1 billion people who desperately need work creates low cost programming -- not some magical clan system.

      Your assertion that pre-Christian Celtic methods of group warfare only came about due to the influence of Rome is just silly. The Irish Gael didn't evolve in a bubble on Ireland, and the Roman empire never made it that far. Dun Aengus dates to the 100 B.C., a time when the people on Inishmore would never have heard of Rome. Caesar had just been born, and would not begin his conquest of Gaul for another 42 years. Indeed, if it was some outsider they feared, they would not have left the fort open to the sea.

      Finally, I have not libelled you. You libel yourself when you post such rubbish. I merely mock you for my entertainment and the entertainment of others. I need not identify myself so that you may have an easier time stalking me; I do not underestimate the potential sickness of psychotics like you who espouse your kind of tripe. My comments stand on their own; they need no flesh to condemn you in the minds of others. Good day . . .
    2. Re:Why are you an anonymous coward? by Baldrson · · Score: 1
      Finally, I have not libelled you. You libel yourself when you post such rubbish. I merely mock you for my entertainment and the entertainment of others.

      You have repeatedly represented mischaracterizations of my statements as fact. Later you are claiming that some of these mischaracterizations are merely a "mock". That won't wash. I'm sure people like you believe that speech or acts against groups of people, as opposed to individuals, are worthy of extra punishment as "hate". Yet you refuse to identify yourself as an individual.

  223. MOD PARENT UP by selfdiscipline · · Score: 1

    I hope that you are able to surmount all of your difficulties.

    --


    -------
    Incite and flee.
  224. Nope by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    Across the street.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  225. My Mistake: the Boonies are THE BOONIES by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

    I moved back to my hometown of Toledo OH in 1997 from Boston MA. It is THE WORST MISTAKE I ever made in my life. Learn from it.

    Places like Toledo (which includes anything within a 1hr radius from it) are economic dead zones, stuck inside America like little Third World countries. I never in my life had (and have) seen such an old population of tech workers (what few there are, BTW). There's a reason for that. The reason is that a place like Toledo has permanently underemployed population sectors. Those old folks in "young men's jobs" are clinging to their jobs for dear life. They are clinging so desperately since outside that job, there's almost nothing available for years at a time but manual labor paying $6-$10/hr.

    There's a reason housing was (note the past tense) so cheap in places like Toledo. It was cheap since there were no fucking jobs. It was cheap since the people who wanted to sell, really couldn't find qualified buyers.

    This housing situation changed in some perverted mirror of the dotcom boom's effects on the coasts (as well as the credit boom that had apparently struck every bank in America as some sort of good idea -- bleah!). Housing has risen appallingly, even while thousands were and are being tossed out of work. It was only this year 2004 that Toledo's average metro housing finally reflected economic reality and fell 5%. But after years of steep rising, 5% is a nothing decrease. Homes in Toledo are still at least 50% overpriced when compared to the economic strength that can be marshalled here to buy them.

    What I'm seeing here and now is a "renting adjustment". Houses are sitting on the market so long that many "owners" are making the adjustment of renting out their unsalable homes. Just to go by the small sample of what 2 neighbors have done, I'd wager that many of these are due to relocations ... the owners are getting the hell out since the economy's so shitty, but -- what a shock -- they can't sell their homes in the same economy. Rather than take the loss from such a housing bubble, they elected to convert their homes to rentals and then take off for better fiscal climes.

    You may be offered a job in one of these areas. You should strongly consider your future if you do so. That job may collapse under you in only a couple of years, and then where will you be? Yes, that's right: stuck in Loserville USA with a whole bunch of losers who will work for far less money than you will. And it will never get better. Not in a place like Toledo. (Case in point: The only McDonald's in downtown Toledo closed about 4 months ago.)

    To rant a bit to support my thesis: I lost my home and have otherwise contracted my expenses down in size to what I never considered possible before (and I was a spendthrift before, to give you some idea). All the clothes I wear come from Goodwill or the Salvation Army stores. My shoes are bought used for about $4 each. I do my own maintenance on my vehicle (1988 Dodge Dakota), and bring in a mechanic friend who works cheap (he's essentially homeless himself). I eat out probably 12 times a year and never, ever rent movies (I waited until all 3 Matrix movies hit the library -- now, THERE'S willpower). I buy toilet paper in year lots. Etc.

    I'm living such a hand-to-mouth existence (writing this now on a Pentium I, 100MHz, that I obtained in 1995) because I've been saving money. I'm at $18K and still climbing (no mean feat at $14/hr as a field service tech for a bank). (It would be $22K savings, but I've got loans out to friends who have had their own fiscal troubles ... primarily revolving around years of un- and under-employment.)

    The savings are necessary since I'm getting the fuck out of this place and will strike out on my own like I did in my 20s. Moving to Boston in 1990 was the best thing I ever did, and I may return there. I had found that I was undercutting tech workers

    --
    [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  226. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    People in the south are nice to people...you just have to act like a nice person.

    BS. I grew up in the south, and people are just as nasty there as anywhere else, and probably more. It's much, much worse, however, if you happen not to be lily-white.

    Yeah, if you're white and wear an NRA t-shirt, they might be nice to you.

  227. Meanwhile, in the Bizarro universe... by Sunnan · · Score: 1

    "Honey, I'm getting a huge paycut, and we have to move to another state!"

    "That am wonderful news!"

  228. Comic tyranny by Sunnan · · Score: 1
    I would be ruling over actually might be better off under my system of comic tyrany

    You're not the first to think that, unfortunately.
  229. Cost of reproduction vs cost of living by Baldrson · · Score: 0
    Perhaps if you explained your 'programming gets passed down through clans' thesis, I might bother to address it. It is not prima facie, so I will treat it like I treat the ravings of any other lunatic.

    Wired magazine carried the "ravings of a lunatic" named Bryna Siegel who claimed that autism results from assortive mating between people who are predisposed to be "geeks" -- and offered her up as authoritative. Maybe you should call up the public health department and recommend the lot of those guys to the local sanitorium. It seems less plausible that assortive mating has increased at the rates presupposed to support the recent increases in autism given the high degree of immigration over the same time period -- particularly among programming professionals.

    Moreover, there was another way of interpreting what I was saying, which is closer to my meaning:

    A more important metric than cost of living is cost of reproduction. If you measure only cost of living you can end up genociding certain demographies through differential impact of public policies on reproduction. Ignoring these unintended consequences is malign neglect on the part of demographies within the same body politic that benefit from said policies.

  230. Shut Up and get me a SLURPIE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EOM

  231. While we're Bush bashing... by abb3w · · Score: 1
    Another useless factoid. Compare 2004 election results with State-Specific Rates of Mental Retardation in adults 18-64. You may note that the states with the 12 highest rates all went red.

    Of course, this isn't an absolute correlation; Bush also took seven of the twelve states with the lowest rates. I suspect it's mostly due to a regional correlation of both, er, problems. =)

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  232. A real American says "REALLY"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're better off?

    That sure seems to be what your post suggests. Short of cloning, I don't see how our people won't be all but extinct in a hundred years or so.

    I suspect you won't have any pure races in America in 100 years or so. Why are you concerned about being "Pure blooded" Indians? If a German was concerned with only marrying another "Pure Blooded" German you would likely think he was a Nazi.

    And I don't know what languages you speak; I speak English and Spanish. My "ancient tribal languages" exist on reel-to-reel in some anthropologist's office.

    Big deal, I live in America, I speak english. My Grandfathers on both sides spoke something different. I really could care less if they spoke a dead language or not.

    Sure there are those of us who are fortunate enough to have gotten off the rez. Hell some of us even work in IT and goody, our company gets kudos for checking off a little box on their diversity paperwork.

    If the Indians won, do you think they would have given the white man Affermative Action? Is that part of the "Warrior Spirit"?

    And your co-workers tell you how much they liked Dances With Wolves or think the rez is some aboreal hippie paradise.

    Everyone deals with jokes about their upbringing or their race. Don't get oversensative about it.

    I doubt many companies will be outsourcing their IT work to the rez.

    I doubt it too, given the low education of most of the people there.

    The worst isn't behind us. We're pretty much gone as a people.

    And so are white people, but you don't hear them bitching do you? Their reprouction rate is around 1.6 and by 2075 they will be a minority in America. You don't hear that on the news, or anywhere else because if some white dude bitches about that they are then branded a racist.

    Want to know something about the Lemhi-Shoshone fifty years from now? Better go web surfing (or the equivalent) or to a museum. There won't be anyone with enough blood quantum [petitiononline.com] to be considered an American Indian.

    The same thing will be said about WASP's eventually.

    If you marry someone from another nation, the goverment won't recognize your children as being Native American anymore if their blood quantum isn't high enough, even if 3/4 of their grandparents are full-blooded Indians but from different nations. Why should the BIA (Bureau of Indian Affairs) get to decide who are salmon eaters [lemhishoshone.com] and who are not? Shouldn't we decide? Shouldn't our children be considered BOTH their parents' people?

    Their decisions only matter for affermative action and such things. Whats wrong, hasn't the government given you enough already?

    Most of us are forgotten, still barely scraping by on the rez. You don't have to travel to the third world to see soul-crushing poverty - just visit a rez without a giant casino.

    So instead of bitching about it, why don't you go teach some of your IT skills to these people? Or would you rather they suck off the government teat forever?

    You think the racism is gone? Bullshit. Even shitty jobs are hard to come by - on or off the rez.

    Oh give it the fuck up already. Companies love to hire skilled minorities, they get that little checkbox like you mentioned, plus a skilled worker on top of it. Your SHITTY attitude is why jobs are hard to come by.

    But there sure are plenty of liquor stores and too many of us are downbeaten drunks.

    Supply and demand.

    If you happen to live along a major interstate, then goody for you. Some development company might choose to build a casino. That's if your council isn't greedy and shortsighted enough to string developers along. If the angry infighting doesn't make it impossible to get the project underway. If you grease enough wheels in the state government and get some well-connected lobbyist t

  233. You lost, get over it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well this gravy train is fucking over. Take your liberal-bashing, federal-tax-leaching, confederate-flag-waving, holier-than-thou, hypocritical bullshit and shove it up your ass.

    I'd hate to break this to you, but the African American vote is what kept your blue states blue. Otherwise the election would have been an electoral landslide. There are plenty more conservatives in the North than there are liberals in the south. You are the minority my friend, move to Canada if you can't deal with it.

    You bring up the founding fathers when it's convient for your arguement, but do you think they would have wanted gay marriage, welfare, x-ian bashing schools, or affermative action? If the founding fathers were alive and standing next to me today, they would jump through my monitor and whip your pansy, liberal, give-peace-a-chance ass.

    You lost, your party lost, American is a conservative country. Get over it.

  234. Re:Rural America? by strict3 · · Score: 1

    "But now that the Dems make their left wing social platform such a large part of their platform, they're becoming republicans."

    Huh? I was under the impression that Republicans were supposed to be against social programs.


    Yes, they are. My comment makes perfect sense. I wasn't referring to social programs, I was referring to the left's social agenda.

    "The people you mock are the most honest, real, hard working people in this country."

    Number one, I did no such thing!


    My statement was directed to the "idiots on the coasts", not directly to you. I thought I had made this clear, but i guess I didn't. Most of my post was not directed at you.

    --
    "If a frog had side pockets, he'd carry a hand gun" - Dan Rather