Slashdot Mirror


Xbox360 Pricing, 2 Models at Launch

Tom writes "According to news in the LA Times, Microsoft will release two Xbox 360 packages when the console is launched later this year. The basic package will retail for $299 and will not include a hard disk, nor will it include a wireless controller, instead shipping with a wired pad. The second package will retail for $399 and will include a 20 Gb hard disk, wireless controller, wireless headset, Ethernet cable and remote control. No release date has been revealed, but a mid to late November date is expected."

621 comments

  1. I've solved which of the next gen systems to buy by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm just going to buy all three and retire.

  2. UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'd put money on us Brits having to pay £299 and £399, with the usual inflated prices.

    1. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      I hope us Euro country buyers also get the same numbers.

    2. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by indie1982 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well this has just flashed up on the BBC News latest news ticker...

      "Microsoft says price of new Xbox 360 games console will start at £210"

    3. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope so. You Britainers have to pay for extra shipping. You expect something for nothing?

    4. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by indie1982 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In fact, here's the info!

    5. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope so. You Britainers have to pay for extra shipping. You expect something for nothing?

      I figured it to be VAT and import taxes.

    6. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by ash.connor · · Score: 1

      £280 for the top tier model isn't too bad. So IGN reports http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/642/642656p1.html

    7. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Average for a next gen console at launch.

      But still, if Microsoft want to shaft Sony they need to bring it in at £179 or so.

    8. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by wackybrit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That'd be cheaper than the US price though. The US price for the basic one comes out at £195, so it's only a £14 premium at the end of the day.

    9. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realise that they'll be made in China, not the US? The US makes nothing anymore. Well, pollution maybe.

    10. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by kahei · · Score: 4, Funny


      You think the USA makes stuff! That's adorable! Hold that pose while I fetch my digital camera! Oh, wait, there's one in my mobile :)

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    11. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If we don't make anything, how the fuck do we make pollution?

    12. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by wheany · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're evil.

    13. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touche

    14. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already said prices will be £209 and £279

      Remember, VAT is included in our prices, in the US... tax is not included.

    15. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by bitchell · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Gas Guzzling Cars in there 100's of Millions.

    16. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Microsoft says price of new Xbox 360 games console will start at £210"

      Isn't that just a straight $ to £ conversion at the current exchange rate, rather than the likely UK retail price?

      Or does it specifically say it'll cost £209? (which seems like too odd a figure to be real).

    17. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Behlal · · Score: 1

      Are you actually aware of the current exchange rate? A quick glance at http://www.xe.com/ucc/ would tell you that the $299 price tag is more like £165.26. Therefore, £210 is a £45 ($81.41) difference.

      For reference, as of today (17th Aug 2005) the exchange rate is 1 GBP = 1.80906 USD.

    18. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by doctor_no · · Score: 3, Informative

      Once again Europe pays more. 299EUR($369)/£209.99($377) for the base version and 299EUR($491)/£279($506) for the "Value pack".:

      Source:
      Joystiq.com

      Along with the announcement of $299 and $399 pricing levels for the Xbox 360 in the US, Microsoft has revealed European recommended retail prices for the two consoles and accessories. Not surprisingly us Europeans are getting shafted. Instead of £165/242 and £220/323 respectively (what US dudes will pay), EU prices are £209.99/299.99 and £279.99/399.99 for the basic and extra pack. That's £45/58 and £60/77 more! With such an inspired simulateous worldwide release day it'd have been nice if everyone paid the same price.

      Along with announcing the console prices in Leipzig, Germany today, Microsoft revealed how much the accessories are gonna cost ya'. Here's a rundown:

      Hard Drive (20 GB) - £69.99/99.99 (aren't there 120GB PC drives available for less than this?)
      Memory Unit (64 MB) - £22.99/34.99
      Headset - £14.99/19.99
      Wireless Controller - £32.99/34.99
      Rechargeable battery pack - £9.99/14.99 (lasts for 25 hours of wires free power)
      Wireless Networking Adapter - £59.99/79.99 (eek!)
      Universal Media Remote - £19.99/29.99
      SCART AV Cable - £17.99/24.99
      VGA HD AV Cable - £19.99/29.99 (very useful if you have a PC screen)

      http://www.joystiq.com/entry/1234000173054784/

    19. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worth the extra money to live in Europe and not have to listen to whining Americans cnuts.

    20. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Blod · · Score: 1

      In UK you have to pay £280 (premium) and £210 for normal version. Which is still higher price than US or other european countries.

      Somebody metioned VAT and transportation costs. This could be the truth, but how can you explain such high difference between UK and other EU countries? What is important to remember is fact, that MS is going to send much less X360 to Europe. By making price higher, they *could* avoid problems with lack of hardware.

    21. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by dhovis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As far as I understand it, European prices usually include VAT, whereas American prices do not include sales tax (the closest equivelent we have to VAT).

      So to do a direct comparison, you need to factor in that most Americans will pay additional sales tax (6-8% is typical), though sales taxes are all at the state or local level in the US, and some states have no sales tax.

      You also need to account for the fact that most of these items are made in China or Taiwan and are shipped by sea. The shipping distance is greater to Europe than to the US, and that adds to the cost.

      So don't just convert currency and say you're getting ripped off, I'd be willing to bet that it evens out.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    22. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by bigalsenior · · Score: 0

      of course were going to have to pay more but after all af the years of doing so do you really think we give a shit anymore

    23. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by davidj0228 · · Score: 1

      smart Americans shop online to avoid the aforementioned state sales tax issue

    24. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Wofser · · Score: 1

      No big difference between UK and EU. The big package cost 400Euro/280£. 400Euro=272£ so its 8£ more in the UK.

    25. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Different countries have different VATs here and they don't sell them at a lower price in the ones with lower VATs. Seems to me the markup roughly equals the most expensive VAT in the Union so lower prices where there are lower VATs would be feasible.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    26. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Bobartig · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean criminal? Pretty much every state with sales tax requires you to declare purchases made elsewhere without sales tax on your federal return. I take it for granted that nobody does this, but still, if you're going to break a law to save a few percent and call it smart, I'm going to propose the brilliant solution of stealing one outright.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    27. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Blod · · Score: 1

      8£ is ~47PLN, and that's about 15 beers (0.5L). Now, say this isn't a big difference.

    28. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      The US exported about $800 billion worth of goods last year. In the same period China exported about $500 billion worth of goods, while Japan exported about $550 billion. Of course the US slaves out the dirty work to people around the globe (where they hilariously gloat, as if they're in a superior position), herself largely dedicated to large capital goods.

    29. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by fermion · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that computer hardware is never in the US until it is shipped to the US retailer. If we assume that the factory is in china, shipping to the US and shipping to the UK is about the same deal. Likewise distributing through the EU and US should be about the same. If you discount the attempt to price the product differenty thoughout the EU, which costs lawyer money.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    30. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame Microsoft for higher prices in Europe. Look at your own economic policies... VAT and high import tariffs, among others You see, there are consequences to high taxes, and you are experiencing them now.

    31. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by doctor_no · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To say the hike in the extra money that Europe pays for their system is due to VAT or sales tax in a weak one. Europe pays over a 20% premimum over the US for pretty much the exact same hardware. There is no state that has anywhere near a 20% sales tax, and if sales tax was such a big issue there are numerous online sites that you can purchace from to avoid sales tax.

      Not to mention the original Xbox was lauched in the UK for £300 and then dropped to £199 a month later.

      Also, to argue that XB360 is more expensive because its built in China/Taiwan is also ridiculous. Pretty much everything is built in China/Taiwan anyways. There is a well established infrastructure to bring goods from Asia to Europe efficiently.

    32. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a question, so do the retailers all pay the same price for the system then? I just moved to Germany from the US, so I'm not very well informed about how this all works, but it seems that retailers who sell it for the suggested price in lower VAT countries would make out a lot better than in the higher VAT countries. For instance, does a German retailer who sells an Xbox for 299 euros(with a 16% VAT) make more money than a French one who sells for the same price(an almost 20% VAT)?

    33. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by joggle · · Score: 1
      Even so, you still save on paying county and city level sales taxes. In Colorado, the state sales tax is 2.9%. If I were to purchase a product in my local city (Boulder) the total sales tax would be about 8.5%. So I would still be saving 5.6% of the cost and still be legal.

      The downside is I wouldn't be supporting the purchase and maintenance of open space (where I believe approx. 1/5 of city sales tax goes in Boulder), various charities the city supports, etc.

    34. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      I'd say that it's more likely Microsoft is trying to protect themselves a bit from USD v JPY v EUR currency issues.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    35. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong - In Denmark the sales tax or MOMS is 25%

    36. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by owenb · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that there's a very high chance that camera in your mobile was made in the USA?

    37. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by i+wanted+another+nam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The government already takes 23% of my income out of every check. I have to pay fees every year just for the "privilege" of owning and driving a motor vehicle. I pay insane taxes on cigarettes and gas. I pay taxes on my phone line and my cable television. If you want to call me a criminal because I want to avoid paying a 6 percent sales tax, you can do that. I work my ass off for that money, and if the government has a problem with that, they can kick me the fuck out.

      --
      The image is a dream, the beauty is real. Can you see the difference?
    38. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly talking about US State that has above 20% sales tax.

    39. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by swimin · · Score: 1

      In my state we have an option to declare that we have no idea how much sales tax we should pay for online purchases and pay something like $40.

    40. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

      > The shipping distance is greater to Europe than to the US, and that adds to the cost.

      Shipping costs from China to Europe for a pair of sneakers is far than $1 .....

    41. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Most video games seem to be manufactured in the USA (at least the ones for sale here) if the packaging is to be believed. But yeah, it's not a lot of shit and some kinds of items (clothes come to mind) have become VERY hard to just walk into a store and purchase something that was made here. Even harder if you're looking for clothes made here of non-imported fabrics.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    42. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Go tell that to IBM, Motorolla, TI, Intel, AMD

    43. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by smcallah · · Score: 0

      They won't be kicking you the fuck out.

      They'll be forcing you to pay AND locking you the fuck up. So then you'll be stuck in the country.

      Most people work their asses off for their money. What makes you an exception to having to pay the taxes that everyone else does?

      If you want to avoid paying sales tax, move to a state that doesn't have one. You can move to states that don't have an income tax either. If you're that worried about the tax.

      But don't imply that anyone that pays the tax is not working their ass off for the money.

    44. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 0

      In all these discussions it seems the issue of having to build a completely different video output system (PAL) for a relatively small market is probably one of the issues that end up making European consoles cost more. I don't recall anybody posting an acknowledgement of that in any thread complaining about the price gaps.

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
    45. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by payndz · · Score: 1
      So, if these prices are accurate, an absolute bare-bones UK system (console + a memory card) will cost you £209.99 + £22.99 = £232.98. Which is a fair amount in itself. Then you need a game. Which if what various gaming people have been hinting is true, will be nearer the 50 quid mark than the current 40. So now we're up to £282.97. Just to play one game.

      Then, we start moving into "Yeah, but to play Game X you really need the hard drive", and "I'm sorry, sir, but we don't sell the base console, we only sell 'value' packs" territory.

      Y'know, I think I can wait a year. Or two. Or three. Hell, I only got a PS2 last year, so maybe I can wait four - and I won't be paying £50 a game by then either.

      Unless MS decides that it's time to take the Steam route to eliminate the second-hand market in the meantime...

      --
      You must think in Russian.
    46. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also need to account for the fact that most of these items are made in China or Taiwan and are shipped by sea. The shipping distance is greater to Europe than to the US, and that adds to the cost.

      Well, the actual fuel costs may be higher, but Europe and South-East Asia have extremely efficient ports. A Singapore -> Rotterdam Mainport line should be cheaper than one to the US west coast. Either way, the oceanic transport costs probably a few cents per XBox. So total distance probably isn't it. Local transport costs with trucks and all may actually be more expensive in Europe, so that combined with higher margins demanded from stores, higher tax, localisation costs and more wealthy people may very well combine into a perfectly reasonable explanation.

      Still, why the UK is more expensive than the rest of Europe...

    47. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kudos, you missed the point. None of these manufacture even 10% of their (hardware) production in the US of A.

    48. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Okay, maybe not very much stuff in actually made in the U.S., but quite a good deal of consumer electronics, media, software, etc. are designed in the U.S.

      I have no problem with overseas production of chips designed by a U.S. company that ends up with 90% of the resulting profits.

    49. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by empvirus · · Score: 1

      Fortunately to avoid sales tax for me, living in Washington state, all I have to do is cross the border into Oregon and buy whatever from there. I live in northern Washington, so for me to make such a trip, it'd have to be worth all the gas.

      --
      Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
    50. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by KrunZ · · Score: 1

      if the government has a problem with that, they can kick me the fuck out.
      And where do you want to go?

      Where I live I pay 60% tax on the last dollar I earn. I pay 25% sales tax. One gallon of gas cost nearly 6 dollars. Cars have 200% sales tax and on top of that we still pay around 300 dollars a year in car-tax.

      But... I get free healthcare and free education.

    51. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work my ass off for that money, and if the government has a problem with that, they can kick me the fuck out.

      Working hard? This is your boss. Stop working your ass off by posting on slashdot and get back to doing some real work.

    52. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Nice anonymous post and nice to see you can pull numbers out of your ass.

      Sure a lot of the components might be purchased over seas on a lot of things, but not everything. I have friends who work for some of these companies in my local fucking town making things people use every day so don't give me that crap.

      I'm sure when Intel designs a chip they're like "hmm lets just buy the core cpu from china because it'll be cheaper"

      Oh yeah and I'm sure that's 90% of the reason those companies buy things from other countries (price) see I can pull numbers out of my ass too.

      give me a fucking break.

    53. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or your state could do something like Michigan where they allow you to pay an ammount based on your yearly earning if you can't itemize your purchases. Since I don't save every freaking receipt and stuff I just pay the $16 and feel good about myself. Since that comes out to less than the tax on $300 and I purchase much much more than that.

    54. Re:UK buyers screwed again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the usual tax whine. Dude, we all pay taxes, and your 23% is small change compared to some. The roads you drive your vehicle on, they didn't just spring into existence. Phone taxes pay for that horrible service called 911. Go fuck yourself.

  3. Removable Hard Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there was going to be a removable hard drive anyway, I personally would opt to buy the cheap system and then get the hard drive addon without all the extraneous accessories that will be used sparingly.

    1. Re:Removable Hard Drive by R.D.Olivaw · · Score: 1

      " If there was going to be a removable hard drive anyway, I personally would opt to buy the cheap system and then get the hard drive addon without all the extraneous accessories that will be used sparingly."
      Where I live, if I decide to buy the HD and the wireless controller, it would already cost more than 100$ so an extra 100$ for all the extras doesn't look too steep. On the other hand, the xbox does not feature on my to-buy list. I hope Sony comes up with a similar deal.

    2. Re:Removable Hard Drive by KingVance · · Score: 0

      RTFA...

      The 299 system comes with nothing.

      The 399 system comes with HDD, wireless controller, wireless headset, et al

      But, for a whopping 99 dollars, you can buy the HDD addon.

      W00t! You saved a whole dollar!

      For the low low price of one dollar, you can have wirless functionality. How exactly would you use those accessories sparingly?

      399 system is definitely worth it...cheapass

    3. Re:Removable Hard Drive by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      Calm down Bill Gates. You WANT to make money, remember?

  4. This is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't see what's new about this, the decision has been known for quite some time and the LA Times is not an "official" soruce any more than the dozen of other artices we've seen about this.

    Who am I kidding, this is /. the story will get duped before the day is over

    1. Re:This is news how? by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, this story is a dupe of a story from last week.

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    2. Re:This is news how? by badasscat · · Score: 1

      I don't see what's new about this, the decision has been known for quite some time and the LA Times is not an "official" soruce any more than the dozen of other artices we've seen about this.

      You don't see what's new about an official announcement vs. uninformed speculation?

  5. well, that will probably be bad by realmolo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the "cheap" model doesn't have a hard drive, that means that developers aren't going to use the thing in their games.

    I assume you'll still be able to use it for saving games, but what about multiplayer stuff? Are new levels going to go on the memory card? And didn't I read something about MS using HUGE memory cards for the Xbox 360? Like, 1Gigabyte cards or something?

    I'm just surprised they would split the market like that. But they're MS, they're crazy.

    1. Re:well, that will probably be bad by staed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Isn't it possible that games will save your progress to a harddrive if one is present and if not it will save to a memory stick? Wouldn't be too hard to implement.

    2. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Holi · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you read that they would have 1 gig memory cards. The Xbox 360 peripherials paga says that they will be 64 megs.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Surt · · Score: 1

      Presumably that's even hidden from developers by an API. It would be stupid not to.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Steve525 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the "cheap" model doesn't have a hard drive, that means that developers aren't going to use the thing in their games.

      Bingo! The hardrive on the original Xbox was rarely used well anyway. A few games took advantage of it, but most games were released on multiple systems, and therefore didn't. The reality is, only a few games really needed it. By adding a hardrive, Microsoft thought they were adding a component that would make the XBox significantly better than the PS2. Instead they added a component that just made it a lot more expensive to build. (And unlike the other components in the console, a hardrive's price doesn't drop over time. Capacities go up, but prices don't go down). To avoid hemoraging money again, Microsoft needed to drop the hardrive from the Xbox 360. To maintain compatibility with the original, though, they needed to at least make it an option.

      I'm just surprised they would split the market like that.

      Perhaps, but as you and I said, developers aren't going to use the hardrive. People who just want to play Xbox 360 (not Xbox 1) games will be able to get by just fine with the base model. People who want extras, (downloadable content, Xbox 1 compatibility, probably some media options), will need the upgraded version. Many people don't care about these extras, so why should they pay for hardware to do it?

    5. Re:well, that will probably be bad by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You say games won't use it, but the fact is that the XBox could make them use it whether they're aware of it or not. The simplest example would be if it cached content as it was read from the disc so it didn't have to be reloaded each time. A second example would be if it acted like an ultra large memory card for saving games. Another example were if it were used to "hibernate" a game so someone could walk away and pick up where they left off the day before.


      Then there are games which could use it. For example, to download patches, extra levels and so forth.


      Then there is MS touting the box as a multimedia hub (although in reality it was more like a dumb terminal). A HD could mean that it could rip songs, movies etc. to disk and play them on demand. And MS could sell video on demand - films, shows, trailers and so on, as well as distributing firmware updates, patches and more on it.


      It seems pretty strange that they're going to piss this all away which is what they're doing.

    6. Re:well, that will probably be bad by h2d2 · · Score: 1
      Capacities go up, but prices don't go down

      Are you high? Because if you are not, I must be in heaven paying only $80 for a 160GB drive, when according to your "theory" you must have paid out of your ass for a similar size drive.

      In short, hard drive prices do go down, a lot. Especially considering that MS never upgraded the Xbox drive from the tiny 10GB hard drive it originally came with, it wasn't a significant cost.

      --
      Mozilla stole tabs from NetCaptor. So what? Right?
    7. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Nitar · · Score: 1

      Instead they added a component that just made it a lot more expensive to build. (And unlike the other components in the console, a hardrive's price doesn't drop over time. Capacities go up, but prices don't go down).

      Actually, prices drop on hard drives all the time. Not only that, they drop significantly in price over time. Just over 2 years ago I bought a 120gb drive from newegg for $133. The exact same item (which they still stock) is now $75. That's almost 50% in about 2 years. Keep in mind that those are retail prices.

      Microsoft is including a 20gb hard drive with the XBox 360 'fully loaded' bundle. Keep in mind that the prices I mentioned earlier were for a drive 100gb larger than what Microsoft is using. Also, the prices I mentioned were consumer prices. Microsoft will be putting them in the system for a whole lot cheaper. It's hardly going to cause them to "hemorage money" as you put it. Did you happen to see how much they are selling the drive if you buy it separately? It's $99, they're going to make a profit if anyone buys the drive as an add on. They are giving people a huge incentive to buy the $399 version.

      Perhaps, but as you and I said, developers aren't going to use the hardrive.

      I agree with you about that games themselves will work with either XBox. However, to say that developers won't be using the hard drive is going a little too far.

      People who want extras, (downloadable content, Xbox 1 compatibility, probably some media options), will need the upgraded version. Many people don't care about these extras, so why should they pay for hardware to do it?

      I highly doubt all of the downloadable content that was being touted at E3 this year means that people don't care about it. Most of the folks that I know that have an XBox love XBox Live and the content that is provided. The only complaint I've heard is that they wish there was more of it. You are right that there are also going to be a lot of people it doesn't matter for. The people who care about downloading new levels and new games will be buying the XBox with the hard drive. Those who don't will buy the core version.

      To the original poster, I don't really see a reason why it as a problem for there to be two versions.
    8. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Miaowara_Tomokato · · Score: 1

      Don't pay $80 for a 160 GB HD. If you have a Fry's in the area, they have recently carried a 200 GB HD for $80, with a $30 or $40 rebate.

    9. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Steve525 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In short, hard drive prices do go down, a lot. Especially considering that MS never upgraded the Xbox drive from the tiny 10GB hard drive it originally came with, it wasn't a significant cost.

      You are confusing the cost per one unit (MB), when it is really the cost per the unit that matters. One a certain capacity minimum is reached, the hardrive doesn't get a whole lot cheaper. It costs nearly as much to make a 10 GB drive as a 160GB, since much of the cost is the assembly, mechanics, and electronics which are the same on both units.

      Look at the web page you linked to. Until the mid-90's hard drives were expensive, period. In say 1997, a hard drive costs $330 (2.1 GB). In 2004, a hard drive costs $250 (250 GB). The price didn't change a lot, but the capacity went up (by 100x). Granted, there are lower capacity hardrives that are cheaper, but you see my point (I hope).

      Sure, you and I might be able to buy a few really cheap 10 GB hard drives off ebay, or from a surplus shop, but with the volumes Microsoft needs, they can't.

    10. Re:well, that will probably be bad by beanball75 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What he meant is that hard drive prices have a floor. Cost per megabyte does go down, but overhead for manufacturing a hard drive doesn't.

      Using Newegg as an example, we have a WD 40GB internal HD for $51.00.

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16822140118

      And a WD 80GB internal HD for $51.50.

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16822144102

      In the $50-60 range you will see 80GB and 40GB drives intermixed.

      Manufacturers also tend to stop making drives no one buys like a 10GB internal drive. The price on a hypothetical 10GB drive would probably be so close to $50 that no sane person would buy one unless they had some capatibility problem.

    11. Re:well, that will probably be bad by alvinrod · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Any idea if Microsoft will be using regular HDs, or if they're going to have some sort of proprietary type that you can't just buy in a store?

      For $100 I can get a 200GB HD that really could turn an Xbox 360 into a media center. 20 GB just isn't going to do it for me.

      A hard drive actually has a lot more value to me than the rest of the stuff. Don't want to bother with batteries or charge times for a wireless controller. Don't need an ethernet cable since I already have some, can get them cheaper elsewhere, or make one if I really have to. I hope the remote control isn't required for DVD playback, which just gives me more reason to hack the sucker, but if it is I'll just use a DVD player. The wireless headset doesn't really do much for me either since if I mod/hack the box I probably won't be able to play Live.

      On the other hand they could just as easily use some type of HD that I can't just go out and buy. Which means I'll probably be stuck paying $50 (or more!) for a hard drive that's maybe worth $20. If this is the case I don't forsee myself getting an Xbox 360 until there are some major price cuts.

      I know I don't speak for all of us, but for some of us, the HD is probably the least useless part of the package.

    12. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Troed · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has said again and again that games MUST NOT rely on a hard drive being present on the Xbox 360. Also, unlike on the Xbox, all savegames must be small enough to fit on the (64 Megabyte) memory cards.

      source

    13. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      Any idea if Microsoft will be using regular HDs, or if they're going to have some sort of proprietary type that you can't just buy in a store?

      We are talking about a company who is using hardware security mechanisms to lock-out 3rd party accessory makers http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/10/ 2113252&tid=211&tid=109&tid=10&tid=137/.

      What do you think?

      Yes, they are going to gouge on the HD price as much as they can. I predict that there will eventually be a large HD option with software for a media center - but it won't be cheap.

    14. Re:well, that will probably be bad by ect5150 · · Score: 1

      And unlike the other components in the console, a hardrive's price doesn't drop over time. Capacities go up, but prices don't go down

      What in the world are you talking about? Of course HDD prices have dropped over time. Is getting a 20 gig drive now the same cost as it used to be 8 years ago? No...

      --
      I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.
    15. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Saige · · Score: 1

      The original Xbox does have such a cache on the HD, so it would make sense that the 360 would also have one if the HD is present.

      And all the other things you mention (except perhaps the 'hibernate') will definitely make use of the HD. In fact, I doubt non-HD owners will be able to make use of downloadable content.

      I still hate that they're doing this. They went from a HD that everyone could depend on being there, with the first Xbox, to something that's as useful as the PS2 HD (i.e. a waste of money and hardware).

      They've taken it away from the few developers that made use of it. (it's how Halo 2 avoided load times, and I'm sure Halo 3 won't have such a nice feature now)

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    16. Re:well, that will probably be bad by SuzanneA · · Score: 1

      Memory card sizes are often stated in megabits by most of the media - its how Sony and Nintendo have always stated them. Microsoft claims 64MB, which is 1Gb. Thats probably where the confusion has come from.

    17. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Holi · · Score: 1

      Actually wouldn't 64MB be 512Mb.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    18. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Dinny · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh but Halo sells system. I think they might try to use Halo to sell more harddrives. It's certainly going to have downloadable content and push the 360 to limits. Why not go that extra step and require a hard drive. It would sell a lot of hard drives.

    19. Re:well, that will probably be bad by cmacb · · Score: 1

      "Any idea if Microsoft will be using regular HDs, or if they're going to have some sort of proprietary type that you can't just buy in a store?"

      Don't even joke about that. Of COURSE they will use a standard hard drive. Otherwise what are us folk who want to have a Microsoft subsidized Linux box going to do??!!

    20. Re:well, that will probably be bad by pangolin+jr. · · Score: 1

      Unlike the XBOX, the XBOX 360's hard drive is external so it's essentially an add-on. Anyone with the "cheap model" can buy a hard drive for it later or upgrade to a larger hard drive in the future.

      That being said I still think it is a bad idea to sell a model without a hard drive because developers can't be guaranteed that a hard drive is available. This will limit certain uses of it. Any hard drive features can't be vital to the games ability to run, it can only be used to enhance it.

      I'd prefer it if the "cheap model" at least contain a hard drive even if it is smaller than the one provided in the other model.

    21. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Phisbut · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Don't even joke about that. Of COURSE they will use a standard hard drive. Otherwise what are us folk who want to have a Microsoft subsidized Linux box going to do??!!

      And don't forget to read the whole EULA before buying an Xbox harddrive, because they might try to pull a Hotmail on you and claim ownership to anything and everything you store on it. Ever read the Hotmail terms of service?

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    22. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Bingo! We have a winner. Halo 3 (and Oblivion, to a lesser extent) will sell hard drives like candy.

      The big thing is also being able to play Halo, and Halo 2 on your shiny new X360, can't do that either without the hd. The stripped package is nothing more than MS finding a way to say they launched at $299. It's not gonna fly.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    23. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Criterion · · Score: 1

      No, not "MUST NOT" but that to reach the broadest audience it would be best to be usable without the hd. Guess what? That's not gonna fly. There WILL be games that require the hd (at least to play optimally and use all features.. if not flat out have to have it). This will be used to sell more hd's to people that cheaped out at the start, and get even MORE money from then over time than the people that bought the full bundle from the start. Don't know about you, but I don't care to render my original XBox library useless by cheaping out at the start (hd is required for backwards compatability).

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    24. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Laurance · · Score: 1

      I think that this will just go to reinforce the idea that the money will be made in the upgrades. The hard drive used buy the Xbox 360, I am sure, will be somthing unstandardized that only the 360 can use and Microsoft will charge a bundle for it.

      It is terrible that the $299 version does not even offer a hard drive. I have done a foogle search on 20GB hard drives and found that their are some availabe for as low as $30(USD).

    25. Re:well, that will probably be bad by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't actually have an xbox but most people I know that have one use their hard drive to archive games onto it so that they don't need to go look for games to play them. And yeah, where did they find a 20GB hard drive for $99.99? I just saw a 300GB hard drive on sale for $109.99 a couple minutes ago.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    26. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Steve525 · · Score: 0, Troll

      You say games won't use it, but the fact is that the XBox could make them use it whether they're aware of it or not. The simplest example would be if it cached content as it was read from the disc so it didn't have to be reloaded each time. A second example would be if it acted like an ultra large memory card for saving games. Another example were if it were used to "hibernate" a game so someone could walk away and pick up where they left off the day before.

      All of this is nice, but not required (or even all that important) to make a good game. If you don't believe me, then why didn't the Xbox outsell the PS2?

      Then there are games which could use it. For example, to download patches, extra levels and so forth.

      Also, nice, but not required.

      A HD could mean that it could rip songs, movies etc. to disk and play them on demand. And MS could sell video on demand - films, shows, trailers and so on, as well as distributing firmware updates, patches and more on it.

      Yes, and if you want these features you're going to have to shell out for a hard drive. (In fact, you might eventually be able to choose the size based on your needs).

      Nothing you list is required for a good gaming experience; they are all nice extras. Many people would rather save $100 than have these extras, so why make them spend it. Now, you could say that Microsoft should include it all (or at least the hard drive) at the lower price point. Nice idea, but Microsoft has made the (probably wise) decision that there is only so much money they are willing to loose on each console sale.

    27. Re:well, that will probably be bad by imsoclever · · Score: 1

      Thats not the point though. This means that developers will be hesitant to include any interesting features that require a hard drive, which means that it will pretty much serve just as a giant memory card.

    28. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Troed · · Score: 1

      Do you have a source for that? The "MUST NOT" part is allegedly from developer documentation so any other info is of course very interesting.

    29. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Criterion · · Score: 1

      You just don't get it. The hd looks to be either a 2.5" or 1.8" form factor. You most certainly won't find one of those for $30.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    30. Re:well, that will probably be bad by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, XBox Live Silver is now free- I suspect that smaller amounts of data (game saves and the like) will be available through Live. Log in to your account from a friends house and play co-op on a game from one of your own saves without carrying a card (or XBox) with you. Play your unlocked Dead or Alive content too- I think I remember seeing something along the lines of personally customizable textures from a PC, that would all need some sort of Live connection for multiplayer stuff anyways, why not use it again to solve a no hard drive issue?

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    31. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Eugene · · Score: 1

      what he meant, is there's a buttom price for HDD. the cheapest/lowest capacity model of HDD always cost about the same, which is roughly $50 or so for the 3.5" models, probably $60-70 for the 2.5" models. and since console ships with those lowest capacity drives, over time your cost is always the same.. it won't go down much, if at all.

      20GB 2.5" HD cost ~$65 right now, but in 3 years, you won't be able to buy 20GB HD at a cheaper price, rather you can buy a 60GB HD at $65.

    32. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Laurance · · Score: 1

      They should have made an external firewire opinion. That would have save some cash for the end user.

    33. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Saige · · Score: 1

      I get the impression that the 360's HD won't offer the same speed as the one in the Xbox, meaning that using it for gameplay just isn't going to work out nearly as well. The 360's HD doesn't appear to be designed for games to use during play.

      It's more "Loading" screens for all of us...

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    34. Re:well, that will probably be bad by DrXym · · Score: 1
      The XBox didn't outsell the PS2 for a number of reasons - that the PS2 already had a massive catalogue of titles, the XBox was more expensive for quite a while, the box looked ugly, the controller was clunky and well, it's Microsoft we're talking about here. In its favour it had better graphics, but in very few games did it actually matter that much.


      Now is a HD essential to gaming? No I suppose not if a Gamecube is all you want out of your device. But if you're sick of loading times, or wish that a game got extra content, or that you got bug fixes then yes it.


      Personally I'd want a HD simply because I want my next console live up to the hype and be useful for other things. A console with a HD that could play music & movies would be a fantastic device, or allow me to do casual web browsing. I'm personally that neither MS nor Sony went that extra inch and made the thing a PVR. I expect we'll see kits that do enable such functionality - assuming the thing has a harddrive.

    35. Re:well, that will probably be bad by dreadlock9 · · Score: 1

      On the current xbox, the hard drive is used to store updates to the dashboard and some games you play online. When the Halo 2 1.1 update came out, you could not play online unless you downloaded it.

      With the Xbox 360, what happens when people find cheats for Live games and a lot of people don't have a hard drive to store patches on? Would the developers choose to let the online experience degrade, or lock out people that cannot store the updates?

    36. Re:well, that will probably be bad by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Sony has never used bits, only bytes. Nintendo is the one that always stated ROM sizes in bits.

    37. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Allison+Geode · · Score: 1

      is there any word on what the differences between xbox live silver and higher level versions (I assume gold, maybe platinum?) might include? if silver is free, what do I get for paying?

    38. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is the case (and it sounds pretty plausible), then why aren't we getting 120 gig drives along the XB360, instead of 20?

    39. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      5. What is Xbox Live Silver?

      The Xbox Live Silver service means you can connect your Xbox 360 console to a broadband Internet connection and get functionality right out of the box without having to pay any amount of money.

      With Xbox Live Silver you can:
      Create an online Gamer Profile
      Access the Xbox Live Marketplace
      Engage in voice and text messaging
      Talk to a single friend at a time using voice chat
      Receive video messages from Gold level members
      Access massively multiplayer online games (additional fees may apply)

      6. What is Xbox Live Gold?

      The Xbox Live Gold is similar to the current paid Xbox Live service. The Xbox Live Gold service delivers the complete online connection package. With Xbox Live Gold you have all the features of Silver level, and additionally:

      Play multiplayer games online
      Video chat
      Multiplayer online tournaments
      Participate in Xbox Live online programming, such as Game with Fame, Play and Win, and Prime Time activities.

      7. I heard that the Xbox Live Silver service will allow me to play multiplayer games online on weekends. Is that true?

      Yes and No. It is not true that Xbox Live Silver users will be able to play multiplayer games like Xbox Live Gold members every weekend. However, Microsoft plans to allow Silver users to play multiplayer games online on special weekends similar to when HBO has free programming weekends.

      see http://features.teamxbox.com/xbox/1245/Xbox-360-FA Qs/p4/ for the full FAQ...

      google is your friend

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    40. Re:well, that will probably be bad by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what if you want to use it as a cache??

    41. Re:well, that will probably be bad by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      " a hardrive's price doesn't drop over time. Capacities go up, but prices don't go down)"

      Why do you think MS is going with only 20GB? If it cost the same to include 160GB then they would, they must be getting those for extremely cheap.

    42. Re:well, that will probably be bad by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      That is BS. They're going to include a network adapter (built into cost of unit), sell you multiplayer games, and then go and charge you to play your own game on top of that....

    43. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought that the mem cards were 1 gigabit in size.

    44. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piracy. They don't want people to be able to hold 10-20 games on their HDD straight out of the box.

    45. Re:well, that will probably be bad by asb · · Score: 1

      A HD could mean that it could rip songs, movies etc. to disk and play them on demand.

      Do you seriously think hardware made by Microsoft (or Sony) could ever be used for making copies of digital content? The 3rd generation consoles will be so locked down with DRM that you are lucky if you are able to view your own "legal" media with it.

      --
      Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    46. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      and that is different from the "classic" XBox how?

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    47. Re:well, that will probably be bad by hobbesx · · Score: 1
      They're going to include a network adapter (built into cost of unit)

      What does this have to do with the cost of running the service?


      sell you multiplayer games, and then go and charge you to play your own game on top of that....

      See: http://www.gamestop.com/product.asp?product_id=644 859

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    48. Re:well, that will probably be bad by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Do you seriously think hardware made by Microsoft (or Sony) could ever be used for making copies of digital content?


      Why not? Sony sells MP3 players which ship with ripping software. Microsoft makes WMP which rips software. Both even fetch the track and album title from online!


      What's the difference between a PC doing it and a console doing it? In some ways the console is arguably more secure since it is for all practical purposes tamper proof. The ripper could water mark the file with the box's MAC address or use a proprietary file format to prevent people sharing music. On top of that both MS & Sony could sell music tracks for use on the device and even stream radio channels etc. MS sell a "Media Center" version of XP which allows you to rip TV and radio.


      The same for video. Let the thing be able to rip the main movie off a DVD and play it back. Where is the material harm to the studios? Doesn't Microsoft already licence its WMP codecs to Archos and others who do just this already?


      The fact is that if I have a console, just sitting there next to my TV or hifi and the thing *could* rip and play songs & movies, then I see no reason that it shouldn't. MS have crippled this box so it's a dumb terminal to a windows media PC, when it is quite capable of streaming and ripping media in its own right. That just stinks.

    49. Re:well, that will probably be bad by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Microsoft makes WMP which rips software


      Doh I meant music.

    50. Re:well, that will probably be bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve525, I think you are smart and can write well.... honestly. I just thought you should know. No, I am NOT hitting on you. Unless you are a bear.

    51. Re:well, that will probably be bad by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      I seem to be able to play TONS of PC games online without paying a service charge, PLUS I didn't have to buy the hardware from the same people makin/liscensing the software.

  6. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by akhomerun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    haven't heard of memory sticks for the xbox?

    Tell me, have you seen the front of the console??? The Memory Slots are RIGHT THERE!!

    I'd say the $399 deal is pretty good considering it comes with just about everything, and given the fact that you can't buy a laptop hard drive yourself for under $70

  7. Not a bad deal by fewnorms · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, a 100 dollars will get you a 20 Gb hard disk, wireless controller, wireless headset, Ethernet cable and remote control? Not a bad deal. I do wonder how many people would actually get the "no hard disk" version.
    On the other hand, it's still an expensive piece of kit, and odds are the version without a hard disk will still have the connectors on the inside, happily protected by "warranty void when opened".

    --
    Veni, Vidi, Velcro!
    1. Re:Not a bad deal by calibanDNS · · Score: 2, Informative

      odds are the version without a hard disk will still have the connectors on the inside, happily protected by "warranty void when opened".

      As I understand it, all models of the XBox 360 will support an external removeable hard drive; the $399 version just ships with said hard drive. If you get the $299 version you'll still be able to buy the hard drive add-on seperately without voiding the warranty or even opening the 360.

    2. Re:Not a bad deal by Caspian · · Score: 0

      No one will fucking buy the $299 version. This is ridiculous. This is just so they can say "our console starts at $299!", but in reality, you'll have to slap down $400+ to get a 'real' Xbox.

      --
      With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    3. Re:Not a bad deal by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I guess I was thinking the opposite. To me it sounds like getting $50 worth of stuff for $100.

      For that, couldn't they at least make it a 120 GB HD so people can use it for more stuff? Let's face it, 20 GB is overboard for saving games, but not enough if its supposed to be some sort of media center.

    4. Re:Not a bad deal by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the point is you'll probably pay $150 for a $50 drive, instead of being able to install any extra drives you have lying around.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    5. Re:Not a bad deal by blankoboy · · Score: 1

      Not a bad deal? We were all thinking that everything was going to be included for $299. This is typical MS bullcrap IMO.

    6. Re:Not a bad deal by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, a 100 dollars will get you a 20 Gb hard disk, wireless controller, wireless headset, Ethernet cable and remote control? Not a bad deal. I do wonder how many people would actually get the "no hard disk" version.

      I'm sure they've had some psychologist work on that. That way, you draw the attention away from the $400 price tag and towards all the extras you get for $100. Same way burger joints typically have an "extreme" burger to make the "big" menu seem more "normal". It works wonders. I know many people that are that way, you make them pick the "good" deal in a set of bad deals, and they're happy with making a good deal.

      I particularly remember one time I was with my mom buying an appliance for me, and she insisted on getting a 150$ more expensive one because she was getting $40 off, and it had absolutely no value to me over the cheaper one. Somehow that was a better deal than buying the cheaper one at retail price. I call it $110 down the toilat. I think the historic quote is this one:

      "It is not because of the few thousand francs which would have to be spent to put a roof over the third-class carriages or to upholster the third-class seats that some company or other has open carriages with wooden benches. What the company is trying to do is to prevent the passengers who can pay the second class fare from traveling third class; it hits the poor, not because it wants to hurt them, but to frighten the rich. And it is again for the same reason that the companies, having proved almost cruel to the third-class passengers and mean to the second-class ones, become lavish in dealing with first-class passengers. Having refused the poor what is necessary, they give the rich what is superfluous." - Jules Dupuit, 1849

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:Not a bad deal by MustardMan · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not a bad deal? For 400 bucks it should at least come with fucking wifi.

    8. Re:Not a bad deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An removable hard drive alone as an update will you cost you $100.00.
      see http://www.pro-g.co.uk/news/nid/1307/

    9. Re:Not a bad deal by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      "Same way burger joints typically have an "extreme" burger to make the "big" menu seem more "normal"."

      Good point. This is how drink sizes have changed in the fast food industry. Once the current small size in most places was the only size. Then came a bigger size, introduced as large. Then came a bigger size, now called large, the one before called medium, and first one small.

      Then came yet another bigger size, which is now large, the large is now medium, the medium is now small, and the small is now the kids size at some places.

      Sorry for the off topic analogy.

    10. Re:Not a bad deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, it's still an expensive piece of kit, and odds are the version without a hard disk will still have the connectors on the inside, happily protected by "warranty void when opened".

      Actually, the hard drive is meant to be a removable attachment, so there will be an expansion slot on the $300 model if you want to buy one later.

    11. Re:Not a bad deal by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      I can remember something similar with customer studies. Given several choices, people often seem to identify one as the one they hate. Even if they are all good choices. So sometimes we'd leave a choice in that we didn't think was very good to give people something to vent on. Made discussing the other product options go much smoother and kept the engineers from having their feelings hurt. Even seem to help normalize data. If they didn't vent on the sucky choice, well, they just weren't into giving us feedback.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    12. Re:Not a bad deal by Jack+Sparrow · · Score: 1

      So, a 100 dollars will get you a 20 Gb hard disk, wireless controller, wireless headset, Ethernet cable and remote control? Not a bad deal. I do wonder how many people would actually get the "no hard disk" version.

      Actually, it is only extra $60. You will need to get at least a memory card with the core system, right? And they cost $40

    13. Re:Not a bad deal by yakitori · · Score: 1

      Let's not fail to mention about the availability of the value edition of the XBox 360. Weren't the value editions of the PSP hard to come by when it was released? Not to mention a number of stores (EB and Gamespot in particular) will only offer their special sets that comes with 3 games, strategy guide, and whatever else they can toss into it. Would the cost of those sets $599?

    14. Re:Not a bad deal by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      If I can put my own HDD in the cheaper XBox, I'd rather do that, because I can stick something in there that's bigger, faster, and more useful than their 20GB drive.

      I hate wireless controllers. I can probably buy the headset for like $20.

      I can make my own ethernet cable for about a dollar's worth of parts.

      I already have 5 @#$()&* remote controls on top of my TV. I'll be glad to not have another one.

      Oh, wait, it's an MS product. I'm not going to buy it for any amount of money.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    15. Re:Not a bad deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I particularly remember one time I was with my mom buying an appliance for me, and she insisted on getting a 150$ more expensive one because she was getting $40 off, and it had absolutely no value to me over the cheaper one. Somehow that was a better deal than buying the cheaper one at retail price. I call it $110 down the toilat.

      Maybe the cheaper version couldn't legally be sold as a toilet?

    16. Re:Not a bad deal by japhmi · · Score: 1

      I do wonder how many people would actually get the "no hard disk" version.

      Grandparents.

      At least, mine would. Then I'd have to buy the hard drive later (the other stuff I could care less about / already have). They'd probably charge over $100 for the HD.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    17. Re:Not a bad deal by AdamInParadise · · Score: 1

      This is called "Goldilock pricing," it has been studied and it is extremely effective.

      Regards,

      --
      Nobox: Only simple products.
    18. Re:Not a bad deal by Bobartig · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember a time when I was at [some fast food chain, probably McDonalds], and they had no small drink! It was Medium, Large, and Biggie-Extra-Value-Super-Fun-Size. On top of that, the Medium was the same size as the Large I was expecting. It was like I'd just eaten some teacake in wonderland and everything was fscked up.

      Your burger analogy is from Wendys. They noticed almost nobody ordered the Classic Triple, and removed it from the menu. Directly following this, they noticed a steep decline in Classic Double sales. So they brought it back, and Double sales went back to normal. Somehow it legitimizes the "medium" purchase when there's an "absurdedly large" one that you're not getting. Its like ordering 2 x 1/4 lb patties with bacon, cheese, and fries the size of your head is showing restraint. (note: this is what i grew up snarfing as a teenager ;P ) That 3rd 1/4 lb patty would just be nonsense!

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    19. Re:Not a bad deal by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Who is "We"? I know that, for MONTHS now, speculation has been that a base model will be $299, and a bundle will be $360. How is this so much worse than that? Just that you didn't know what was included in the bundle and found out it's something you gotta have, oh, and it's $40 more than was speculated? Big whooping deal.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    20. Re:Not a bad deal by ddefenba · · Score: 1

      My mother suffers from the same syndrome. My father has said for years he's "going broke saving money".

      --
      "Play Outside on Sunny Days." - Nintendo's Shigeru Miyamoto
    21. Re:Not a bad deal by Tokah · · Score: 1

      I own a few wireless Xbox controller, they work pretty well for Halo and Halo2. They're a lot more sensitive though, so if you use one be sure to dial your look sensitivity down a point or three.

    22. Re:Not a bad deal by Criterion · · Score: 1

      "Oh, wait, it's an MS product. I'm not going to buy it for any amount of money."

      Likely I hate MS as much or more than you do, and will not let their steaming pile of shit OS anywhere near my pc, but I gotta admit. They do make fun toys :). Plus, it helps to keep my PC Windows Free(tm), as then I do not need it to play games (most of my gaming is done through dosbox, if it isn't a native Linux game).

      I'll let you borrow my strategy.. buy they Xbox, MS loses money on every one. Then just do NOT buy games new, buy them used, then MS does not get a cut. Voila. Anti-MS gaming using MS toys.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    23. Re:Not a bad deal by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Seeing how a standard 3.5" form factor hd will NOT fit into the space the small form factor drive will go in, no. Unless you've got some 2.5" or 1.8" form factor drives (I'm not sure which it is..) it's kinda pointless to complain about that. Oh, btw, this size drive is NOT cheap.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    24. Re:Not a bad deal by Criterion · · Score: 1

      For $100 I call it a deal. Small form factor drives are not cheap. A 60GB 1.8" is $200ish.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    25. Re:Not a bad deal by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The PSP was sold in only one version in the US, the "sandard" package was only available in Japan.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    26. Re:Not a bad deal by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I was thinking 3.5" drives. Are they really using 1.8" drives? I didn't see that in TFA, though it does say "20GB detachable hard drive".

    27. Re:Not a bad deal by fani · · Score: 0

      Not really.
      20GB HDD = ~ $30
      wireless controller = ~ $35
      wireless headset = ~ $15
      Ethernet cable = ~ $5
      Remote control = ~ $20

      Total = ~ $105

      You're paying about 95% of that cost. It is a bad deal.
      IMHO, releasing different versions of the console is plain silly. Might as well buy a PC in that case.
      The whole reason for a console so its a std. architecture and everyone has the same specs.

    28. Re:Not a bad deal by zod1025 · · Score: 1
      buy they Xbox, MS loses money on every one. Then just do NOT buy games new, buy them used, then MS does not get a cut.

      That just hands them the mindshare they so desperately crave. Just say no.

      --

      -ZOD-
    29. Re:Not a bad deal by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      20GB laptop drives (2.5") are cheap.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    30. Re:Not a bad deal by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Right because it's so easy to buy a Dell or eMachines for 400 bucks with 3 3.2GHz PPC chips inside, plus the latest generation video card.

    31. Re:Not a bad deal by BaudKarma · · Score: 1

      You can have lots of fun by trying to order a small drink at the drivethrough. They'll repeat your order back, but call it a medium drink. Tell them you want a small drink, not a medium. They'll tell you that medium is their smallest size. You can improvise from there.

      --
      It's the land of the brave, and the home of the free
      Where the less you know, the better off you'll be.
    32. Re:Not a bad deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Down with the first estate!

    33. Re:Not a bad deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This explains fanboy-ism.

      Man, I love my PS2 and Gamecube is innovative (and Nintendo makes profits!) but I fucking hate XBox, M$ is teh d3vi7.

      [and then the mirror folks who rationalize the XBox and PS2 but hate Nintendo for being kiddie]

      Meanwhile the game market is bigger than ever.

    34. Re:Not a bad deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "an expensive piece of kit"

      almost exactly how I'd phrase it...

    35. Re:Not a bad deal by Babbster · · Score: 1

      They're using 2.5" drives.

    36. Re:Not a bad deal by douceur · · Score: 1

      Nonetheless, in today's console market, that is a good deal. $300 is common for a new console. Add up the accessories you're getting, and an extra $100 is not bad.

    37. Re:Not a bad deal by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      I worked at Mcdonald's and one of the first things you get taught once you have to server customers is to ask 'Medium, Big?' when people ask for a drink (we don't have any bigger sizes here in the Netherlands), and conveniently leaving 'Small' out :

      The thought behind it is a cheap psychological trick : People don't tend to downgrade (definitely not with other people around them) as it tends to make them look like a cheapskate.
      I really disliked this policy, as I think they should serve people what they want and not push them to more expensive items : so there have been times when I 'rewarded' the 'brave' people (who just stuck to ordering what they initially wanted) with an occasional free upgrade to a medium soda, for the same price.

    38. Re:Not a bad deal by Swanktastic · · Score: 1

      Another typical trick is to move people towards middle choices when the customer doesn't have a strict feeling of what they want to do. For example, when Non-Profits send out a card asking people to donate money to their organization, they typically have 4 choices, a low, mid, high, and write-in. For example, $5, $45, $100, and _______. Most respondents will choose the middle value.

      If the middle value is moved up to $50, the respondents tend to still mark the middle value, resulting in a greater average donation. The perfectly rational person would write in the exact value they feel comfortable donating, but we actually tend to be guided by the reference points that are set by the suggested values.

      There's a famous study where people are asked to tell what amount consumers would pay for various products. Before responding, they're asked to think about the last four digits of their Social Security number. What's interesting is that people with higher last-four Social Security numbers are willing to pay more for the products than those with lower last-four SS numbers. The study is stasticically significant at pretty high levels (in the 90's IIRC).

      It makes you realize that the prices we're willing to accept are somewhat arbitrary. A $50 tie doesn't seem as expensive if you've just bought a $400 suit. On the other hand, if a salesperson had tried to sell you the tie first and then the suit, you might balk at both prices. Pretty much everyone in marketing is aware of the principles involved, so they probably didn't have psychologists working on the pricing. But, I do completely agree with you that the $399 model seems much more reasonable when compared to the $299 model.

  8. Still no game? by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

    Why do these game systems still refuse to be released with a game included?

    On a different topic, how many games are going to feature a sticker stating that it "Requires X-Box hard drive"?

    Hopefully MS will allow gamers to upgrade the product.

    1. Re:Still no game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because not everyone will want the same game. I mean there must be someone who got an X-Box who didn't want Halo, surely?

      The shops will do bundle deals, adding an extra $50-100 for some games. Usually the worst ones they can't shift.

    2. Re:Still no game? by akhomerun · · Score: 1

      it's pretty obvious that none of you here have even looked at pictures of the console. the hard drive is basically a removeable laptop drive that sticks out of the top of the console. of course you'll be able to buy one.

    3. Re:Still no game? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Why do these game systems still refuse to be released with a game included?

      If they are trying to lose money on every system to make up for it in game licences, then it doesn't make sense to include a game. It's an extra development expense to make a game that doesn't need to be spent, especially as most games don't have universal appeal.

      I'm sure Sam's Club or Walmart will have an inexpensive bundle, and you can chose whether to buy the bundle or not.

    4. Re:Still no game? by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      True I hadn't seen any photos. So I thought I'd have a quick look.

      Seems like a good, practical idea.

    5. Re:Still no game? by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      People may have bought an xbox not wanting halo, but they eventually played it somewhere and bought it.

    6. Re:Still no game? by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 1

      What they need to do is bundle some XBox1 games with it, along with some demos, etc. Example, throw Halo/Halo2/both and a demo of Halo 3 onto a single disc and toss it into the package. As a non Xbox owner I would be slightly more inclined to pick a 360 up if it had some bundled older games with it, but as is, no way I'm buying one.

  9. failure by skatephat420 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What better way to make no one want to buy your system than to release two different systems off the bat. If they were smart they would hold off because there just isn't a market for a new system right now. I think I'll wait and get the final version, you know, when they are ready.

    Expectations are the mother of all sorrow

    1. Re:failure by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Final system? Ha ha, what's that? They'll have a new one on the market every 3-4 years, without a doubt.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    2. Re:failure by Nitar · · Score: 1
      If they were smart they would hold off because there just isn't a market for a new system right now.


      I'm sure Microsoft has done plenty of their own research on this. Not to mention the fact that new systems come out as the current generation begins to look primitive. About every 4 years.

      What kind of information are you using to draw your conclusions?
    3. Re:failure by Criterion · · Score: 1

      No market for a new system? Are you mad? People are chomping at the bit for a new system to be released. They are not two different systems, one just comes with more stuff, like the little hd, ready to be plugged into the slot, and the other you must buy the hd (and all the other stuff) seperate.

      Oh wait, I meant to say that one is in a configuration such that it is fully usable, and the other is to allow MS to say they released at $299.

      Either way, the choice is easy for me. I (as do most people I'm guessing) require backwards compatibility so I can play Halo on my shiny new hardware. Therefore I get the one with the hd. Easy.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    4. Re:failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! The only people really chomping at the bit are the Bling Generation people. Thank god I missed that one by a year or two. I play games...and the fksing consoles out now with the exception of the PS2 look great still. Sony should be releasing first imo because of how archaitch thier graphics look. Xbox & Gamecube still look beautiful in the right hands of certain developers.

    5. Re:failure by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Even if they were going to do 2 versions, I'm surprised they didn't release just the expensive one first to simplify the launch and gouge all the suckers, then an "XBox lite" for the masses a few months later.

    6. Re:failure by zoomzit · · Score: 2, Insightful
      $400? Ugh. They need to do something about pricing.

      I just wonder how many gamers are in my situation. Right now my computer is a little dated, and when I think about it, I could easily dump $400 into my computer to make it better performer for games while retaining all of its other useful functions. On the other hand, I could buy the Xbox 360 with that $400 for games and still be saddled with a dog of a PC.

      Why wouldn't I update my PC instead of getting the Xbox 360? I could get a damn sweet graphics card with that sort of cash.

      Xbox 360s and PS3s should not try to be all things to all people. They should do games very well, and leave the rest of the "convergence" crap to the computers. It's just a bad deal for the consoles to run up against the PCs. It's especially bad for MS, who is ultimately putting their xboxes against the windows OSs.

    7. Re:failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should update your PC instead. The only games that will probably be worth getting on the 360 will be on the PC earlier (like Elder Scrolls 4).

    8. Re:failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've already come out and said they were going to release an upgraded version like every year didn't they?

    9. Re:failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of information are you using?

      Of course they've done their research but that doesn't mean they are right.

      Are you ready to spend $400 on a new system because you're not happy with the way your current system looks?

      I think the current gen systems could last another year or two except maybe the PS2(I give it a year).

      Oh wait what about the research Nintendo and Sony put into this?

      Did you forget that they do research too?

      Both of them have been in the game longer than MS and they both seem to think next year is the right time.

      Who is right? I guess we'll just have to wait and see. The end of next year is the right time for me. I'm still happy with what I've got. I don't think that will change in the next ~4 months so I very highly doubt I will lay down that much cash on the 360.

    10. Re:failure by Felonious+Ham · · Score: 1
      Xbox 360s and PS3s should not try to be all things to all people. They should do games very well, and leave the rest of the "convergence" crap to the computers.

      Because, simply, I spend enough time in front of the computer as it is. A mouse and keyboard might be the badassedest setup for playing your hardcore FPS, but it's also isolating (and as I said, I just spent 8 hours in front of my terminal). My favorite aspect of console gaming is that the whole "family" can be in the same room, bashing each others' brains out.

      And as for the PC functions, I have XBMC running on my XBox v1, and can say playing media by way of the TV and stereo is a much more pleasurable experience than staring at a terminal (that I just spent 8 hours in front of).

    11. Re:failure by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      And miss potential buyers during the holliday season?

    12. Re:failure by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that the style of games for the XBox are pretty much the same crap you've already been playing on your PC for the past 7 years.

      What gets me is that they're trying to impress people with killer graphics on amazing hardware yet none of it seems any better than current gen games on my PC which is (using made up fanyboy numbers) about 10-15x slower than the 360 and PS3?? HAH what a joke!

      The pre-rendered CRAP that Sony showed looks only slightly better (if even that) than Battlefield 2 running on my 3ghz machine with a gig of ram and the PS3 is suppose to be what? 10x faster than that or so? (using those made up fanboy numbers again)

      I think I'd rather spend $400 bucks upgrading my PC.

    13. Re:failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'My favorite aspect of console gaming is that the whole "family" can be in the same room, bashing each others' brains out.'

      In social gaming the game and system is secondary... with good friends you'll have as much fun on an N64 as on the new1337wed xbox reacharound.

      Plus, if you don't like your monitor, perhaps you need to investigate the tv-out socket on the back of your PC? You can hook it up to your stereo's speakers too.

  10. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by andyic3 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but it's great for pirates. A pirate can buy the cheap one, add a hard drive, mod chip (if one is released), then play their games. They won't be playing them online anyway.

  11. Cutting it close on the release date by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they want a successful launch then they really need this thing out well before Thanksgiving. And they'd better have the retail channel well stocked for Black Friday (the day after Thanksgiving). Any production snafus or delays are going to kill holiday sales and create a bunch of unhappy customers.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Cutting it close on the release date by Dal+Platinum · · Score: 1

      If they want a successful launch, then they should probably wait. It's too soon.

      Sony's 'soon' release date is probably putting the shits up MS, so they are going to try to be clever and jump the gun.

      Meanwhile, Sony will be laughing and saying something like 'hahaha, silly Americans jump gun, we not release for another year. eat our collective ass'

      I'm not a zealot either way, I have a PS2 and an XBOX, although I only bought the Xbox for media centre use, and I'm not sure if MS are taking that part of their sales into consideration.

    2. Re:Cutting it close on the release date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know "Black Friday" is a myth. It may kick off the holiday shopping season, but retail sales increase steadily all throughout December and peak the weekend before Christmas Day.

    3. Re:Cutting it close on the release date by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      A myth? Have you ever been to the store that morning? I was at best buy 2 years ago and the place was so full of people.. The mall was insane. Myth about the whole "Sales go into the black" maybe, but the shopping is CRAZY.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    4. Re:Cutting it close on the release date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought "SNAFU" meant that fucked up is the normal situation, not that the normal situation gets fucked up by something...?

  12. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My Xbox didn't come with an Ethernet cable either, and it works perfectly fine on Live.

    And yes, if you've been paying *any* attention at all, the Xbox 360 will have memory card slots. They're very, very visible on the front of the console.

  13. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by calibanDNS · · Score: 5, Informative
    It even lacks Live capability since it lacks Ethernet.


    The $299 version doesn't ship with an ethernet CABLE, it still has an ethernet jack on the box though.
  14. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Nairoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, it makes sense - when people complain about the price of the "deluxe" package, it can be pointed out that the "standard" package is cheaper.

    A potential customer looks at the price of the standard package, then looks at the price of the deluxe one... "So I get all this stuff for a little bit more money? Ring me up!"

    Plus it'll look nice in the catalogue... "Xbox 360, only $299!". Joe Average buys it for his kids, as it's "cheaper than those other consoles", not knowing it's about as useful as a brick without a hard drive.

    --
    Just another harmless drunk
  15. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by tgrimley · · Score: 1, Funny

    Have you seen the front of the console???

    the memory sticks go in the controllers..

  16. Just like SEGA by glowimperial · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Confusing consumers with multiple hardwares hasn't worked well for other companies in the past. Especially since the $299 360 is basically a doorstop. And if you say want a second controller and a game, you the functional version is gonna cost you $500 easy, on the first day.

    1. Re:Just like SEGA by sehryan · · Score: 1

      Add in the fact that compatibility with current XBox games is sketchy at best, and you will be *required* to buy at least one game. So it is a high cost for folks new to the system as well as those who are already XBox owners. So much for the built-in loyalty discount (a la PS1 to PS2).

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    2. Re:Just like SEGA by MSFanBoi · · Score: 1

      How is $500 different from any other generation of console. Only this time it INCLUDES wireless, hard drive, headset etc... Not a bad deal, do the math on getting a PS2 equiped the same.

    3. Re:Just like SEGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft has the resources to make the mistakes that Sega did and keep going.

      I like options and look forward to seeing how it turns out. I'll be sticking with the $0 option.

    4. Re:Just like SEGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny, do you have some advance information on which xbox games are going to work? last i read, everyone was still waiting to see exactly what games would work. it could be just the top20 or it could be 200 games. no one knows as microsoft has made no announcements other than the original statement that only guaranteed the top sellers work.

    5. Re:Just like SEGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not, people just have short tempers, short memories, and seem to be short on brains in general.

    6. Re:Just like SEGA by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Confusing consumers with multiple hardwares hasn't worked well for other companies in the past. Especially since the $299 360 is basically a doorstop. And if you say want a second controller and a game, you the functional version is gonna cost you $500 easy, on the first day."

      Oh geez, this is getting irritating. Folks, I know we all hate Microsoft and all and we hope and hope and hope they fail, but it really is causing people to spew some strange comments.

      Sega screwed up by offering multiple bits of HARDWARE, like the Saturn and the 32X, not by offering different packages at different prices. What Microsoft is doing is more akin to the strategies used by Sega and Nintendo both for the Genesis, SNES, and NES systems. Remember the 'Core' system that only came with one controller and a game? They also sold them with 2 controllers and a pack in game for more money. BTW, all three of those systems were quite successful.

      Doorstop, yeah. No HD or a wireless controller is going to seriously inhibit gaming on that thing. Right.

      Folks, I know it's fun to hate Microsoft and all, but aren't we scraping the bottom of the barrel for doom and gloom predictions?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Just like SEGA by GTRacer · · Score: 1
      What Microsoft is doing is more akin to the strategies used by Sega and Nintendo both for the Genesis, SNES, and NES systems. Remember the 'Core' system that only came with one controller and a game? They also sold them with 2 controllers and a pack in game for more money. BTW, all three of those systems were quite successful.

      I'm not sure that's right. The HDD makes a much bigger difference than one controller or two. If devs can choose whether or not to code for it, then it will fracture the market. If they can't, what's the point of the thing?

      While I'm indifferent to MS as a console-maker, it's at times like this I'm glad Sony's waiting until MS and Nintendo's dust settles before launch.

      Hopefully they will learn from the grievous mistakes of the PS2 launch...

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    8. Re:Just like SEGA by glowimperial · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm more than willing to accept your crisisism of my post, but I'm sorry, I'm not a Microsoft basher. I'm actually one of those people that thinks Windows isn't a bad OS, and uses a number of MS programs on a daily basis.

      I do think it's a mistake to sell the 360 without a HD. How is little Johnny going to save his game? I'd consider a gaming system without a built in save game solution to be a doorstop, at this point. I could care less about the wireless controller, and I think selling a platform without 2 controllers is a much more (and apparently industry standard) serious issue. And if I recall correctly, NES, SNES and Genesis all shipped with 2 controllers in the basic system.

      I'd also consider it a misstep to ship a system without a game. How many million more NES's sold because of the popularity of Super Mario Brothers?

    9. Re:Just like SEGA by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      I think the big difference is that Sega made mistakes and got out to focus on what they did well. Sega is still alive and probably a lot more profitable. Microsoft (if the OS chronicles give us any clues) will make the mistakes and try to stay in the game just because they are Microsoft. Only with the consoles they don't enjoy even the thought of a monopoly.

      Of the current generation I like Xbox best. But of the next generation I don't think I will be so willing to even give Xbox 360 a fair shake.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    10. Re:Just like SEGA by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Well, sketchy may apply to some, but as long as you have the hd model (which is required for backwards compatability anyways) I guarantee that Halo and Halo 2 will work. I would be very surprised if any top tier game was incompatable.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    11. Re:Just like SEGA by Criterion · · Score: 1

      I agree the hd is key. I'm also sure that any games that require it will have either a bundle with it, or a coupon to use on the hd. Either way, Halo and Halo 2 (yes, old, original XBox games) will sell many, many hd upgrades. The market cannot "fracture" as there is nothing keeping a user from buying a hd if he wants/needs it. I'm guessing games that do not take advantage of the hd when available for advanced features are going to be few and far between.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    12. Re:Just like SEGA by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I'm more than willing to accept your crisisism of my post, but I'm sorry, I'm not a Microsoft basher. I'm actually one of those people that thinks Windows isn't a bad OS, and uses a number of MS programs on a daily basis."

      I apologize for my err'd assumption. Unfortunately, every XBOX 360 thread lately has been a pitchfork party over how badly it'll fail supported by really dumb rationalizations. It wasn't cool of me to lump you into that.

      "I do think it's a mistake to sell the 360 without a HD. How is little Johnny going to save his game?"

      Yeah this problem has existed since the original Playstation. The Saturn and the 3DO had the right idea: Internal memory. I also think selling it without the HD will make it even less useful. But given that the original XBOX barely used the HD, I'm not exactly crying over it.

      "And if I recall correctly, NES, SNES and Genesis all shipped with 2 controllers in the basic system."

      No, they didn't. The 'core' system was simply the system, power supply, RF adapter, and a controller. As for no-pack in game, this has been a standard gotcha for years. It may be a misstep, but Sony is going to make the same misstep. I'd normally say Nintendo would make that mistake, too, but they're offering the download service for their classic games. So... Heh. Personally, if I were interested in getting an XBOX 360, I'd MUCH rather have the $299 version. I don't care about the wireless controller. I don't care about the headset. I don't care about hard drive. I don't care about it being a media machine. Etc. I do care about saving $100. Frankly, I find the $299 price too high to begin with. Niether Sony nor MS are getting my business at their launches. I'm not shelling out that much money for the most fragile version of their systems while the selection of games it at it's worst.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:Just like SEGA by Osty · · Score: 2, Informative

      The market cannot "fracture" as there is nothing keeping a user from buying a hd if he wants/needs it. I'm guessing games that do not take advantage of the hd when available for advanced features are going to be few and far between.

      Tell that to Sony about their PS2 HD upgrade. Oh, wait, only two games took advantage of it, and it was so poorly received that the PSTwo redesign removed support for the HD entirely. Now the real question here is what do you mean when you say 'take advantage'? If you mean games can use it to save state if the hard drive is available, then of course that'll happen. If you mean games will use it to make your gaming experience better (caching on the hd to reduce or eliminate DVD load times, allowing for multiplayer patches, etc), then I really doubt that will happen. As an example, take Halo 2. It's designed in such a way that once you start the game you'll never see another load screen (talking single player here, not multiplayer where you'll certainly see load screens before each match). It can only do this because the Xbox 1 has a built-in hard drive that Bungie could rely upon. No built-in hard drive, no loading-free gameplay regardless of whether or not you bought the HD upgrade. It's that simple.

    14. Re:Just like SEGA by Saige · · Score: 1

      I believe that will not be any games out there that require use of the HD. And it may well be that there won't be any games that use it whatsoever, and it's limited to storing downloadable content, save games, music, etc.

      In other words, getting rid of the advantage it presented in the first Xbox, and instead emulating Sony's wildly successful PS2 HD strategy.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    15. Re:Just like SEGA by drjenk · · Score: 1

      They never said there won't be ability to save a game with no HD, they just said it won't include a HD. I'm sure there is an alternative way to save a game that will come with EVERY console, like a small flash device or something. I'm thinking the HD will just be for additional content, music etc. If you want to store that stuff, you'll have to buy a HD. I don't see it as a big problem.

    16. Re:Just like SEGA by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Confusing consumers with multiple hardwares hasn't worked well for other companies in the past.

      Like the Nintendo Entertainment System, which came out with a "basic" package with the deck, 2 controllers, and Super Mario Bros., an "intermediate" package that added on a light gun and Duck Hunt, and a "deluxe" package that added on R.O.B. the Robotic Operating Buddy and Gyromite?

      Yeah, the NES was a huge failure, he says sarcastically.

      (And yet, there is an element of truth to your statement -- because the baseline for the system was the "basic" package, very few titles were ever released that used the Zapper, and only one other R.O.B. title saw the light of day. I imagine we can expect something similar with regards to the 360 Deluxe's bonus devices.)

    17. Re:Just like SEGA by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      I think I read somewhere that the XBOX 360 has a USB port and that games can be saved to those USB flash drives. I cannot tell you that is precisely true, but if it is, then it potentially means not having to buy a memory card at launch. Boy, imagine if Microsoft followed a standard for once. Imagine if MS actually followed a standard AND Slashdot actually posted a pat-MS-on-the-back story about it. Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    18. Re:Just like SEGA by glowimperial · · Score: 1

      I grew up surrounded by disturbingly rich kids, so I probably have more light gun and R.O.B. experience than most. I think MS has much bigger plans for the HD in the XBOX 360 than NES ever had for those white elephants.

      Although I a case could be made for a console without networking and HD capability, I bet MS is betting a lot of their ability to take customers away from Sony on their XBOX Live service and the added HD. Nintendo never linked their success to the popularity of the light gun or the R.O.B. (wow, that Robot was a worthless piece of junk, you didn't need it to play Gyromite, which was a good game, and was probably under appreciated because people thought they had to have the robot to play it.)

      Apples and oranges...

    19. Re:Just like SEGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that we (fans) have been bragging for the past few months about the $300 price tag and the god damn hard drive and wireless controllers is enough to make me pissed off over the fact that I now have to pay $400 for all of that and it's STILL not the complete package that they've been hyping this entire time. They STILL want to release updates for the fucking thing over the next few years. Which means even more money if we want those features even tho they'll never get used by fucking developers because there is no reason to program for a feature that nobody has.

      Microsoft basically lied to us all about what we were getting for our money and you're sticking up for them?

      The fact that the hard drive won't be sold in the basic package and the fact that most people will be buying the basic package because most people can't afford much more than $300 (and you still got games and other shit to get also dont forget) means that the hard drive won't be taken advantage of much.. They're basically shooting them selves in the foot.

    20. Re:Just like SEGA by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft basically lied to us all about what we were getting for our money and you're sticking up for them?"

      Before I answer anything else I want to be really clear: I am not sticking up for Microsoft. My issue with the other post wasn't that MS was being dissed, it's that what he said was incorrect. Sorry, but I'm not participating in a tarring and feathering for the wrong reasons.

      As for the rest of your comment:

      "The fact that we (fans) have been bragging for the past few months about the $300 price tag and the god damn hard drive and wireless controllers is enough to make me pissed off over the fact that I now have to pay $400 for all of that and it's STILL not the complete package that they've been hyping this entire time."

      Your problem is not with Microsoft, it's with the fans. MS never ever EVER said it would be $299 with a hard drive.

      " They STILL want to release updates for the fucking thing over the next few years."

      So? If you were prepared to buy it before they said they were considering making an HD-DVD version, why are you suddenly allergic to it now? Oh no, you won't be able to play HD DVDs, whoop-de-fuck. If HD-DVD support is what is really tickling your fancy, why would you care in the slightest what's going on in the XBOX camp? Microsoft was very clear that the XBOX 360 at launch was going to use DVD-9. This has been clear and acceptable for months.

      "Which means even more money if we want those features even tho they'll never get used by fucking developers because there is no reason to program for a feature that nobody has."

      Err okay. Seems like your problem here is self solving. The features will be worthless, therefore it's not an issue that a more expensive version with these features will appear later. Again, I don't understand your attitude here. The specs for the XBOX 360 haven't gone down since it was originally announced back at E3. It was cool back then, but now it's not?

      "...means that the hard drive won't be taken advantage of much."

      Like the original XBOX. Whoop-de-fuck. Alternatively, it's cheaper and has less to break. Meanwhile, the XBOX 360 has standard USB ports that can be used to talk to memory sticks etc. Don't remember that little article about using the XBOX with an iPod? The developers know that the XBOX may have access to several megabytes of non volatile storage. They can work with it.

      "They're basically shooting them selves in the foot."

      They made an affordable verison of the system. Oh those bastards.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    21. Re:Just like SEGA by empvirus · · Score: 1

      I bought a SNES back when they were new, and they only came with one controller. The Nintendo 64 and Gamecube also came with just one controller at the start. All without a game. A bit later after the system has been around (like some odd months) they start releasing these "economy packs" if you will, including a second controller and/or game(s).

      --
      Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
    22. Re:Just like SEGA by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      No, they didn't. The 'core' system was simply the system, power supply, RF adapter, and a controller. As for no-pack in game, this has been a standard gotcha for years. It may be a misstep, but Sony is going to make the same misstep. I'd normally say Nintendo would make that mistake, too, but they're offering the download service for their classic games.

      Uh....yeah they did. All three systems lauched with two controllers and a game in the core system. "Basic packs" (single controller, game/nogame) came later on in the lifecycle (1 year later). This is really a bizarre comment- not only is it factually wrong, but how is any of this a misstep for sony or nintendo?

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    23. Re:Just like SEGA by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do think it's a mistake to sell the 360 without a HD. How is little Johnny going to save his game? I'd consider a gaming system without a built in save game solution to be a doorstop, at this point

      I have no intention whatsoever of buying a 360, but c'mon, this is silly - "little Johnny" will just be able to use a memory card, like the PS1, PS2, Xbox, and Cube have been doing for years with no problem.

      I really fail to see how having to do that would render the system a doorstop.

    24. Re:Just like SEGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't say they launched with core systems. Reread the post he was responding to.

    25. Re:Just like SEGA by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      The specs for the XBOX 360 haven't gone down since it was originally announced back at E3. It was cool back then, but now it's not?

      Wrong:

      Offering the greatest value in entertainment today, Microsoft detailed more key platform experiences that come standard with every Xbox 360 system:

      • Detachable and expandable 20GB hard drive to download demos and trailers along with new game levels, maps, weapons, vehicles, skins, community-created content, and more to rip music for playback and to listen to custom playlists in every game.
      • A wireless controller with Microsoft-patented wireless technology.

      (Emphasis mine)

      And this is still on their freakin' site.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    26. Re:Just like SEGA by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      You're reaching pretty hard to be mad at M$.

      "Detachable and expandable 20GB hard drive..."

      Detachable implies it can run without it. Gee, whiz, they're selling it cheaper so you can choose which size you want later. Those bastards!

      "A wireless controller with Microsoft-patented wireless technology."

      This cracks me up. The HD is understandable. But the wirless controller? It's a controller... without wires. That's the big feature of it. This will have 0 effect on the games. I mentioned the HD was understandable. Fuziness over whether or not most users will have an HD will undoubtedly have consequences with the decisions the game developers make. But the wirless controller? Gee whiz, get a grip.

      Microsoft is still selling this stuff, it's just not as cheap as you imagined it'd be. That's not MS's fault. They tried to give you a choice in the matter and bitch bitch bitch. Frankly, if I were at all interested in the XBOX 360, I'd be ecstatic. I will not pay $400 for a system. I don't care about wireless controllers and the hard-drive is an expensive gimmick. I'd be happy they trimmed the fat to provide a cheaper system, not shaking my pitchforks in anger. Then again, I don't go out of my way to attract karma by bashing M$.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    27. Re:Just like SEGA by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      Who said I was mad at Microsoft?

      I was simply pointing out that something you said in your post was incorrect. They said back at E3 that every Xbox would include a 20GB hard drive and a wireless controller. This statement is demonstratively false.

      I could care less about karma. And why are you insulting Microsoft bashers when you continue to use the ridiculously cliched "M$" moniker?

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    28. Re:Just like SEGA by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Who said I was mad at Microsoft?"

      I took a gamble that you were the AC that replied to me.

      "This statement is demonstratively false."

      Don't get me wrong, I see what you're saying, but I still don't understand the uppity'ness of the a version without a hard drive when it's detachable. Given that it's detachable AND HD's can fail, it's a reasonable assumption that the machine is being developed so that it can operate without the HD. I'll say again: MS never promised a $299 machine with the 20 gig drive.

      "And why are you insulting Microsoft bashers when you continue to use the ridiculously cliched "M$" moniker?"

      Every time I point out that people are waving their pitchforks at MS for the wrong reason, there's some git that tries to say "well you're an MS fan boy." I'm not. I don't care about the XBOX. I was hoping that saying M$ would draw some attention to the fact that I don't think highly of that company. In other words, I was trying to cut that little argument off at the head. I guess I just can't win.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    29. Re:Just like SEGA by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      I took a gamble that you were the AC that replied to me.

      While some play silly games with the anonymous account, I only say things that I stand strongly enough to put my anonymous Internet handle on! ;-)

      Don't get me wrong, I see what you're saying, but I still don't understand the uppity'ness of the a version without a hard drive when it's detachable. Given that it's detachable AND HD's can fail, it's a reasonable assumption that the machine is being developed so that it can operate without the HD. I'll say again: MS never promised a $299 machine with the 20 gig drive.

      True, but just because something is removable doesn't mean that it can't be made a requirement. I mean, controllers are detachable, and they can fail, but they are still a requirement to play games. Like I said, people's main concern with making the Xbox fully functional without a hard drive is that it means it won't be used by developers.

      And you are right, they never promised the Xbox would be $299. But they did promise that every one of them would come with a hard drive and wireless controllers (

      Every time I point out that people are waving their pitchforks at MS for the wrong reason, there's some git that tries to say "well you're an MS fan boy." I'm not. I don't care about the XBOX. I was hoping that saying M$ would draw some attention to the fact that I don't think highly of that company. In other words, I was trying to cut that little argument off at the head. I guess I just can't win.

      It's the old, "having an argument on the internet is like..." bit. You really can't win :-)

      Honestly, I was surprised by your reaction to my post. I've seen you post before and I think you are extremely level headed individual who posts pretty intelligent stuff, especially for the games section. I can understand being annoyed at people who are crying over the $399 pricetag, because Microsoft never said how much the system would cost. I don't see, however, one can excuse Microsoft for completely reversing themselves on what the standard hardware configuration for the Xbox 360 would be.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    30. Re:Just like SEGA by tepples · · Score: 1

      And it may well be that there won't be any games that use it whatsoever, and it's limited to storing downloadable content, save games, music, etc.

      What happens when a save file is bigger than 8 MB (the typical size of an "expanded" memory card), or it needs to be written to so often that the 10,000 writes per sector limitation on cheap flash memory is eventually exceeded? I seem to remember that some Xbox game (was it Blinx: The Time Sweeper?) made extensive use of the HD for storing previous "ghost runs" of a level.

  17. So.. entry level or luxury? by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems rather polar.. you either get bargain basement or everything they can cram into it.. and no in betweens?

    What If you don't want wireless? What if you play rpg's for hours on end and want the comfort your control won't run out of batteries, but still want a hard drive and ethernet?

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by calibanDNS · · Score: 2, Informative

      What if you play rpg's for hours on end and want the comfort your control won't run out of batteries, but still want a hard drive and ethernet?

      Then you buy the external hard drive as an add-on (it's a removable, external drive) and buy an ethernet CABLE. Note that both versions will have an ethernet jack, the $399 version just also includes an ethernet cable.

    2. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by Metal_Demon · · Score: 2, Informative
      "What If you don't want wireless? What if you play rpg's for hours on end and want the comfort your control won't run out of batteries, but still want a hard drive and ethernet?"

      You plug in the wireless controller...(you can play wired with the wireless controller).

      --
      Trust Your Technolust
    3. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      oh my.. you telling me this console will have EXTERNAL hard drives? is this independent of model?.. in other words the deluxe version comes with external too? If this is the case they'll NEVER detect a moded xbox! They shafted themselves!

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    4. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think the additional drive is really a cartridge-like unit, not necessarily external, though maybe externally accessible.

    5. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

      This seems rather polar.. you either get bargain basement or everything they can cram into it.. and no in betweens?

      Considering there is only a 100 dollar difference between the two, seems reasonable. This is a game console, not a Dell...

      I personally wish they only had one model. That's one of the things I always liked about consoles. I like walking in and not having to worry about which model I buy. I like the biggest decision to be color. That's the point of console gaming, in my opinion. If I wanted choices, I'd stick to PC.

      And as I've mentioned before, Xbox was the only one last generation that didn't have any significantly different hardware configurations, and it's one thing I liked about them. I guess they aren't so good at learning from the mistakes of others, which isn't surprising. It's always easier to learn from your own.

    6. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      well.. considering the useful $100 extra package comes out to $400, i could conceivably buy a DELL for the money and have a pc for the price.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    7. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by adnausium · · Score: 1

      i read somewhere (in one of the hundreds of xbox 360 articles) that the wireless can be charged while playing.

      --
      Don't ya hate it when the correct spelling of your favorite screen name is taken?
    8. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by jargoone · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, come on. He was looking for any conceivable reason to bitch, and you had to go and take it away from him. That wasn't very nice of you.

    9. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      As for myself, I'm looking forward to the $50 original recipe XBoxes that are inevitably going to flood the market after the release of the 360. I always buy one generation behind. Not the 'leet-est way to go but most economical. I still play my $50 Dreamcast. 'nuff said.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    10. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      How many different hardware configurations were there for the gamecube?

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    11. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

      How many different hardware configurations were there for the gamecube?

      Only one version was sold, obviously, but the addition of the broadband (as well as dial-up) adapters created what amounted to two installed bases, those with networking and those without. Same with the PS2...the addition of the HDD kit and ethernet adapters created multiple versions in the hands of end users. To my knowledge there are no major hardware additions to the Xbox, as it was already a complete system as sold at launch.

    12. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Xbox was the only one last generation that didn't have any significantly different hardware configurations, and it's one thing I liked about them.

      Apart from color, what where the different hardware configurations of the Gamecube?

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    13. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by Saige · · Score: 1

      If you have the charging kit and battery pack, you can just connect the charger to the controller and keep playing. The battery will charge while you play (albeit at a slower pace than if you weren't playing).

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    14. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by Criterion · · Score: 1

      The wireless controller comes with a cord, and will give you ample warning that it's time to plug in for a recharge.. which can be done seamlessly while still playing your game.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    15. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Course the $400 console would totally waste anything you could get from any pc maker, much less Dell, much less their value models, and given that you obviously already have a computer, I don't see your point.

      I kinda like the thought that my console is a super computer.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    16. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Models produced before May 2004 had the Digital A/V out connector. Those produced after May 2004, the Digital A/V out was removed to cut costs.

    17. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to burst your bubble but there were two gamecube versions. Models produced before May 2004 had the Digital A/V out connector. Those produced after May 2004, the Digital A/V out was removed to cut costs.

      Nintendo did a similar thing with the NES (removed composite video out on top loader). For the SNES, Nintendo removed S-video output capabilities.

    18. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you are totally wrong. A decent computer will waste any of the upcoming consoles for average applications. See the Anandtech article for example.
      It seems that you have fallen for the console makers' propaganda if you honestly believe that a ps3 or xbox 360 is a "super computer."

    19. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

      A decent computer will waste any of the upcoming consoles for average applications.

      Except that a 400 dollar Dell (which is the kind of computer we were talking about here) will NOT waste any of the upcoming consoles for playing games. Which some people still want to do on these things. :)

    20. Re:So.. entry level or luxury? by radish · · Score: 1

      It's a small enclosure which attaches to the side of the unit, via, I imagine, a non-standard connector. I fail to see what the attachment method of the HDD has to do with detecting mod chips.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  18. Actual LA Times link by a16 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are stories being allowed where the author links to his own website, which just references an original article elsewhere so that the author can gain ad impressions?

    The actual link to the original story is here.

    1. Re:Actual LA Times link by menor · · Score: 1

      Because the LA Times requires registration?

    2. Re:Actual LA Times link by bangzilla · · Score: 1

      Well, notwithstanding that this is waaaaaays off topic: The reason is that it doesn't matter from where the news submission comes, as long as it is accurate and interesting (insightful etc...).

      --
      Rich people are eccentric. Poor people are strange. Me, I'd be happy with odd.
    3. Re:Actual LA Times link by sweeney37 · · Score: 2, Informative

      not to mention that Major Nelson has confirmed it on his blog.

      Mike

    4. Re:Actual LA Times link by a16 · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. Did you bother to click the link?

    5. Re:Actual LA Times link by a16 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I completely agree, except in this case the summary itself even says how it is originally from the LA Times article, and yet the link still goes to this guys site which includes nothing new or interesting other than a copy of what is said in the original piece (with less information).

    6. Re:Actual LA Times link by menor · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      "The story you requested is available only to registered members."

      I hate having to register on a site just to read the news.

    7. Re:Actual LA Times link by rmezzari · · Score: 1

      It asks for registration... :(

      --
      "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds !"
    8. Re:Actual LA Times link by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Because it is the proper thing to do. This guy went to the LA Times, registered and got the article. He then posted it on his site and then someone from /. who likes this guy's site got the information from him. It would be appropriate to go directly to his site, since his site helped bring the article to /.

      Is it possible someone else submitted this story with a direct link to the LA times, sure, but this is the one that got posted.

      This happens many times throughout history in printed and digital media. Go find a book (i.e. psychology) and they will reference a quote in another book which is a quote from another source. Again, it is proper to site the place that *YOU* found the information from - not to just ignore it.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    9. Re:Actual LA Times link by bitflip · · Score: 1

      I used to mind this, but I've since changed my opinion. Sure, the LA Times did most of the work, and wouldn't mind the revenue.

      However, sending readers to the little site helps out the little guy. It gets him/her some immediate revenue, and a little exposure. Maybe deserved, maybe not - but it is a chance for people to see for themselves, where otherwise something worthwhile might've been lost in the noise. There's a lot of babble here at slashdot against big corps getting bigger (maybe you buy into that, maybe not) - sending readers to a small site seems consistent with the overall theme.

      Its not as if the origins of the story were obscured; it's quite easy to follow the links if you're really interested.

    10. Re:Actual LA Times link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look at the submitter's website address and look at the linked article address. yup, one and the same. so it's not like he used someone else's site. he used his *own* in a blatant attempt at getting more hits to his page.

    11. Re:Actual LA Times link by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      Haven't heard anything from Dr. Bellows or Roger Healy, though...

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
  19. Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by cyberlotnet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To sell a version without harddrive would be stupid

    1. Used for saved games
    2. Free parts XBOX Live needs hard drive to save content

    They would be killing 2 of the most important aspects of the gaming system if they did this.

    1. Developers would be unable to rely on the ability of a customer to save games, customers would be turned off and annoyed once they figured this out

    2. XBOX Live argueably one the reasons the XBOX was so successfull in the first place would be neutered which would directly harm there marketshare and continued dominance in the consule online market

    1. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by Vo0k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, So the customers go buy $299 XBOX and a week later $99 hard-drive extension, $49 wireless controller+headset and $69 ethernet extension. And developers just release games with notice "This game requires hard drive".

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    2. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by belgar · · Score: 1

      I would guess that, for the Live data, MS will probably have server-side storage set aside for each user, if they are hard-drive-challenged.
       
      The machine without a HD is still ass, but it does provide an alternative. And why wouldn't they include game save storage space, at least in the form of something solid-state and built-in? That is so 90s.
       
        Gah. I'll stick with my 200GB modded original xboxes, thanks.....

      --
      What does it mean to wake out of a dream
      and be wearing someone else's shorts?
      BNL, Born on a Pirate Ship (1998)
    3. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Au contraire... selling a version without a harddrive is brilliant, if Microsoft encourages the sale and use of large Flash memory cards.

      The 8MB flash memory cards for PS2s and Nintendos are a joke. I can buy a 1GB SD or CF card for $60 and haul it practically anywhere without having to baby it. Why on earth shouldn't I be able to save my games and keep my persistent, and according to Microsoft's plans, purchased Xbox Live content on an flash card that I can haul with me to my friend's house, my second home, or where ever...

      Selling a version without a harddrive will force developers to use the flash memory card for persistent storage. That is exactly the way that the system should work. Sure, if you want the Xbox 360 to serve as a media center, it'd be nice to have a hard drive for storage, but what if I already have network accessible storage and want to use Windows Media Connect and the ginormous hard drive on my computer to store the media instead?

      Frankly, those are only the most obvious reasons why a harddrive is superfluous for any of my purposes. I look forward to not having to pay for one. The lack of a wireless controller may be a quibble, but we shall see.

    4. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by p0rnking · · Score: 1

      I remember reading (can't remember where though), that M$ told game developers to develop their games to take advantage of the harddrive, but the games must also must work without one.

    5. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by p0rnking · · Score: 2, Informative

      Found it.
      According to Microsoft's J Allard (who ever he is?), is quoted as saying in the September issue of Game Informer: "We've said [to developers], 'Hey look, don't bank on the hard drive always being there,' ... 'There may be a scenario in the future where we don't want to have a hard drive, and in that case, we have to make sure that the games that you've created are accessible to the broadest possible audience.'"

    6. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backwards compatibility requires "profiles" of the original games - the most popular games would have profiles available on the release date on the disk, with future profiles available via Live...

      So no disk no backwards compatibilty ??

    7. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by TheBlackSwordsman · · Score: 1
      This is not a rumor. It's a fact. Back when the story broke about Sony selling a hard drive for the PS3 separately, I pointed out that Microsoft was going to do the same thing with the 360. I was shouted down and told that my comment was based on a "really old rumor".

      Well, it ain't a rumor. If you don't believe the submitted link, maybe you'll believe GameSpot?

      From my link:

      Today, Microsoft laid down new facts about its upcoming console at the Games Convention in Leipzig, and they sounded awfully familiar to analyst predictions and forum posters' speculations.

      Microsoft announced that the Xbox 360 will be released in two SKUs, the "Xbox 360 Core System" and the "Xbox 360." The two products will be sold at $299 and $399, respectively. The two systems break down as follows:

      Xbox 360 Core System - $299 (299 Euros, 209 GBP)
      Xbox 360 console
      Wired controller
      Detachable faceplate
      Xbox Live Silver membership
      Standard AV cables

      Xbox 360 - $399 (399 Euros, 279 GBP)
      Xbox 360 console
      20GB detachable hard drive
      Wireless controller
      Wireless Xbox Live headset
      High-definition AV cables
      Ethernet cable
      Xbox 360 Media Remote Control (limited time)
      Detachable faceplate
      Xbox Live Silver membership

      Gee, sounds like more than a "rumor" to me.

    8. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by Mant · · Score: 1

      Yeah that worked so well for Sony...

      The one area the XBox kicked the crap out of the other consoles was online gaming. Everyone had the hard drive, everyone had the network connector, everyone with Live had the headset.

      So all the games could take advantage of it because they knew what the customer had. They could offer updates to online games becuase they knew everyone could take advanage of it.

      If the choice is make a game for all XBox 360s, or a better game for only the hard drives, well 99% of developers will go for 1.

    9. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by geekdreams · · Score: 1

      J Allard is chief designer of the Xbox 360.

      --
      ^ obsolete.
    10. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      And developers just release games with notice "This game requires hard drive".

      Marketing will then scream that profits will be lower unless the game is sold at a slightly higher price. (High enough to get more profit, not so high as to kill sales)

      Then, people who have the higher priced XBOX will be pissed off that games aimed at their hardware cost more.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    11. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by SeaEye420 · · Score: 1
      everyone with Live had the headset.
      Really? I'm pretty sure the last time I played Halo2 about 3/4 of the people had no headset(or at least didn't have it plugged in). A lot of the people just play with the 3 month free card that comes with H2, and they love to play team-based game types. So you end up on a team with 3 people that you can't communicate with!
      --
      Wort Wort Wort!
    12. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by marvold · · Score: 1

      Yeah, don't get caught up in rumors. Er, wait, Microsoft has officially announced this. I suspect customers will be as turned off by the lack of the hard drive as they were for the PS2. It's not like memory cards are strange new beasts.

    13. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      " To sell a version without harddrive would be stupid"

      And nothing stupid ever happens?

      "Used for saved games"

      Even the current Xbox uses memory cards.

      "Free parts XBOX Live needs hard drive to save content"

      The majority of Xbox owners don't have Live.

      "Developers would be unable to rely on the ability of a customer to save games, customers would be turned off and annoyed once they figured this out"

      And this is why the N64 trounced the PlayStation.

      "XBOX Live argueably one the reasons the XBOX was so successfull in the first place would be neutered"

      The majority of Xbox owners do not have Xbox live.

      "which would directly harm there marketshare and continued dominance in the consule online market"

      The PS2, without a hard drive, is the current leader in online console gaming.

    14. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Okay, so the game will run, but with some (essential?) features missing. I can already see this in TES: Oblivion. In Morrowind you would drop an item at arbitrary location and it would remain there forever. You could kill a guy in the beginning of the game, and come back a month later, after becoming the Nerevarine, and he would still have the same common black pants and chitin dagger he had when you killed him (or that you placed on his corpse back then). The savegames quite rapidly grew in size as they contained more and more of the "changed" world. If an NPC fell off a platform, he would remain under that platform to the end. If you picked a gold coin from the table, it wouldn't reappear. And there were MILLIONS of such items.
      Now, likely, "disk" Oblivion players will observe the same behaviour. For "diskless" ones, non-essential dropped items will keep vanishing after a period of time, like in Diablo. Whoa, hurry up to that town and back, or the corpse vanishes and the loot is lost! Live in dream world like in GTA, where whatever you lose from your sight is gone forever...

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    15. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like the stupidest idea ever.

      They're doing everything possible to drive up development costs. I'm willing to bet $60 is the average price of games for the system with $80 being the high end.

      Let's see developers for the 360 now have to:

      1) learn how to program games using multiple processors (not exactly common in the gaming world at this point)

      2) Program games to take advantage of a hard drive, but make them work with out it also because it might not exist. I'm sure all games will have to be able to save and do other crap using the hard drive, memory carts, usb and whatever other junk they come up with by the time it comes out.

      3) Program ALL games to support High Def 1080p, 720p, 420p, 1080i etc etc... Plus make them work on non-high def TV's. Are they going to support the lower resolutions like 420p?

      I'm sure the list goes on and on.

      I mean shit, only rich people are going to be able to afford all this crap. Did they forget that there are more poor people in this world than rich people?

    16. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by Babbster · · Score: 1
      Live in dream world like in GTA, where whatever you lose from your sight is gone forever...

      Actually, I would consider GTA far more realistic in this respect. If a person dies at your feet in real life (let's not encourage real-life killing! :) ) and you walk away without emptying his pockets of cash, that money (and, hopefully, the body) is going to be long gone when you come back a month later. It's only in a dream world that bodies would lie around indefinitely, untouched...

    17. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS2, without a hard drive, is the current leader in online console gaming.

      That right there friends, is what makes this post AN OBVIOUS TROLL.

    18. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Somehow that didn't deter developers in the times of Amiga from writing games "1MB RAM required", so all A500 users had to buy extension cards to use new state-of-the-art games. If the game is expected to be "sweet" enough, developers will use any means and resources available to make it so. The game will be sold at slightly higher price but only because it IS better than the rest. Or (as Microsoft expects) the game will be able to run without the extended hardware but with essential features missing. (Imagine car racing, where the race freezes from time to time, displaying "Loading", or some Counter Strike clone that works offline and you play against bots, or game being limited to two savegames (and requiring you to wipe saves from all other games) just due to savegame size.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    19. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Let's see, I made two claims in my supposed troll.

      First, I said the PS2 doens't have an HDD. While it is true that one can get an HDD for some models of the PS2, effectively the only game that uses the HDD is the game that comes with it. On top of that, with the introduction of the series 70000 PS2s (a/k/a "PStwo"), there are PS2s that are incapable of having an HDD connected to it. The HDD is effectivley a red herring and may as well not exist for the vast majority of PS2 owners, even those who play online (wich is why the series 70000 doesn't support HDD connectivity).

      As for who is the leader in online play, about a year ago there were two PlayStation 2s online for every Xbox Live subscriber. And while the 2:1 ratio may not still hold true today, if you're playing a console online, odds are that console is a PS2.

      So I'm a troll for pointing out that what is supposedly the Xbox's strongest trait is still more popular on their chief competitor's platform? Or for pointing out that this is true without any benefit of a hard drive?

      Putting HDDs in consoles today continues to be little more than a gimmick, and is treated as such by both hardware manufacturers and game publishers. Deal with it.

    20. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      1. Used for saved games
      2. Free parts XBOX Live needs hard drive to save content

      Both of which can be done on a memory card. MS has already said that the hard drive won't be required for Live.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    21. Re:Don't get caught up in pre-release rumors by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      Somehow that didn't deter developers in the times of Amiga from writing games "1MB RAM required", so all A500 users had to buy extension cards to use new state-of-the-art games

      That wasn't a console.

      Console players are not as used to system requirements as computer users are.

      Computer users face those requirements every time they purchase a software item.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
  20. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by zoomba · · Score: 1

    Bah, go ahead and mod my original down... My reading comprehension skills are at an all-time low today :P

  21. Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by denis-The-menace · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Theses days you can't buy anything smaller than a 60/80GB unless it's used.

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    1. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by Name+Anonymous · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can still get 20GB laptop drives easily. Also 1.8" drives come in 20GB size. Also, for OEM purchases, a disk manufacturer will make whatever the OEM wants (if it is technically feasible).

    2. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by ChrisF79 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ebay.

      --
      Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    3. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by fwitness · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is known as the "dirty little secret" of HDDs, that MS learned a bit too late. HDDs do not get cheaper anymore, they just get bigger. I suspect that this is probably going to be a laptop 2.5" HDD though, which you can stil buy in smaller sizes. For now...

      --
      -- I have fans? Wow.
    4. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by alta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Remember that story last year when someone thought it was newsworthy that Intel was stopping production of the P2-266? In light of that, I think 20gig drives should be easy to come buy, especially with all the mp3 players with them.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    5. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by thegoogler · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually, seagate's "U" series still has 20gb drives, and im farely sure western digital still sells them too. they wont be in your local $COMPUMART on the front shelf, but most online stores still sell them if you know how to use the search function :P

    6. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by yeremein · · Score: 1

      Also, for OEM purchases, a disk manufacturer will make whatever the OEM wants (if it is technically feasible).

      Yup, and the 20GB drive will be an 80GB drive with three heads missing. Or perhaps just disabled in the firmware. ;)

    7. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by Otter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, I figured they were salvaging them from $50 iBooks from the Henrico County schools...

    8. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is known as the "dirty little secret" of HDDs, that MS learned a bit too late. HDDs do not get cheaper anymore, they just get bigger.

      I bet you that the 20 GB hard drive Microsoft is putting in these things is signficantly cheaper today than it was two years ago.

    9. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by crow · · Score: 1

      I remember not long ago one drive manufacturer was making a big deal out of lower-capacity drives that were exactly the same as the higher-capacity models, only with a single platter and a single head. The advantages, besides lower cost, are lower power and lower failure rate.

      Of course, in most cases, the drive capacity is rounded down to the next marketable number, and the firmware denies the existence of the extra space. That's why they're an even 20GB, instead of 22.4GB or whatever they really are.

    10. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Theses days you can't buy anything smaller than a 60/80GB unless it's used.

      If you're willing to buy a couple of million units of something "obsolete" you can have just about anything that you want. Ford would happily start making Model-Ts again if someone was going to buy five million of the things.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    11. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      The manufacturer just tests one side of a platter

    12. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by Anm · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can get one right here.

      Anm

    13. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by TMonks · · Score: 1

      They are probably getting them here.
      Seriously though, maybe they are using notebook drives to save space. I think they are still available in 20GB...
      If not, they are probably just having one of the hard drive manufacturers make them especially for them. They are MS, after all.

      --
      I, for one, welcome our new karma-whore sig writing overlords
    14. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by Secrity · · Score: 1

      "Ford would happily start making Model-Ts again if someone was going to buy five million of the things.

      It would take a full analysis to determine if the original materials are still available to determine if Ford (or anybody) would be capable of making Model T's again. Another problem is that it would be illegal to sell a new or close replica Model T in the US and many/most other countries due to automobile emission and safety laws.

    15. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by hobbesx · · Score: 2, Funny
      They are probably getting them here [ebay.com]


      That would explain all the "R U 133T @ ebay? Make $4,000 / week!!one1" signs posted on the side of the road in the Redmond/Bellevue area.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    16. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      60/80GB with a 20gb firmware, exactly how the old XBOX hard drives were larger with a firmware that identifies them as a smaller drive.

    17. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct for 5 million units, but for short runs of 5000, I think there is a loophole regarding emissions. It may no longer be there, but I remember some of the body styles North American automakers used in Nascar were limited runs or some sort of deal that let them not meet emissions standards at the time.

    18. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      That's only if you want to drive it on public roads.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    19. Re:Where the hell are they getting 20GB drives? by Keeper · · Score: 1

      They're (supposedly) using 1.8" drives, which don't typically have the kind of capacity a normal desktop drive would have.

  22. How unfortunate by ChozCunningham · · Score: 1

    I've been very happy with my original XBox to date, and was looking forward to it's sequel, expecting a more refined Xbox Live experience, and another painless funbox. Now, with innovative games seeming to be an exclusive property of the Nintendo DS handheld, and this piecemeal marketing strategy of the XB360, I'm pretty un-enthused these days about the next-gen of home consoles. That's sad.

  23. Halo by rlp · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's a lot of money to play Halo. My resident expert on consoles (my daughter) tells me that people buy the Xbox primarily for the Halo series of games. Also, that the current incarnation of the machine has serious stability / quality problems.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Halo by Gulthek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You might want better info.

      I own an XBox, but not either of the Halos.

      It has never crashed.

      Many people I know own an XBox for XBox Media Center.

      I own it for the games. (Splinter Cell and Ninja Gaiden especially.) Most of which use the system's true 5.1 surround sound support.

    2. Re:Halo by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      My resident expert on consoles (my daughter) tells me that people buy the Xbox primarily for the Halo series of games.

      A lot of people have an Xbox because of better sound/graphics than the PS2.

    3. Re:Halo by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      My Xbox has crashed, but only with Phantasy Star Online, becuase Sonic Team are the best coders ever. (Not as bad as the Gamecube version of course, I gather on that one, other people can remotley crash your game and trash your savefile, as well as the game occasionally crashing of its own accord).

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    4. Re:Halo by FuckTheModerators · · Score: 1

      I'll second Gulthek's response.
      My XBox has never crashed, I've played Halo and, god forbid, I didn't like it.
      And the one program I use most on it is XBox Media Center.

    5. Re:Halo by stubear · · Score: 1

      Then your daughter is a resident idiot, not an expert. You are more than welcome to quote me on that. The only problems I've ever had with my XBOX are with a handful of games. Morrowwind and GTA (all three) tend to get dirty disc errors very infrequently but it can be annoying when it happens. Pitfall had problems from the start. I've played from three different discs on multiple XBOX systems and all three have had serious problems being read. This leads me to believe the game was improperly burned to the disc or there's a problem with the game code itself.

      As for the Halo comment, I have Halo 1 and 2 and am looking forward to the XBOX 360 and Halo 3 but I also got the XBOX because I knew the games would be more than your average anime crap the Japanese keep pushing out the door for the PS2 consoles. While I agree that the women in this genre of art are typically quite attractive, I don't get my jollies ogling them on the TV. I have a wide mix of FPS/TPS, RTS, platformer and RPG games. I'm looking forward to the crop of WWII inspired flight sims Heroes of the Pacific, Blazing Angels: Squadrons of WWII, and Battlestations: Midway. Starcraft: Ghost, if it's ever released, will do so on the XBOX or XBOX 360. I'm looking forward to playing a TPS based in the Starcraft world. XBOX games, when they are on the XBOX and PS2, are typically better than their PS2 counterparts and I've only found the occasional GC version rated as being better by the online reviewers. In short, the XBOX is far more than Halo/ Halo 2 despite them being a revolutionary game with large levels and no load screens except between missions and extremely fun to boot.

    6. Re:Halo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't just the best.. They are the bestest! Only they will ignore the obvious fact that their portal system is completely fsck'd.. Stand too close to that mountain and.. What? Where did it go? I was looking straight at it!

    7. Re:Halo by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      You can crash the Xbox with the first Hunter: The Reckoning by playing two player, and activating a permanent rune simultaeneously. This is bugged, and results in the rune being infinite. Find an accuracy rune, do this to it, and run the accuracy stat bar on your character way off the screen, then go shoot a zombie. Locks the thing solid, with jammed looping audio and everything (no BSOD though, sadly, that would've been even equally entertaining).

    8. Re:Halo by wgaryhas · · Score: 1

      the Xbox has crashed plenty of times for me when playing KOTOR2. (granted there were between 50 and 60 creatures in the room decloaking as I was electrocuting all of them.)

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
    9. Re:Halo by Itchyeyes · · Score: 1

      That's because KOTOR2, while a good game, is buggy as hell. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Xbox hardware.

    10. Re:Halo by cr_nucleus · · Score: 1

      I own an XBox, but not either of the Halos.

      Man, i might be wrong, but i don't suppose you would be most of the xbox owners.

      It has never crashed.

      That's a fact, none of my official games ever crashed. Homebrews can be a bit different though :)

      Many people I know own an XBox for XBox Media Center.

      I have it installed as well, and so i know what a hassle it is to mod and install all of this. We are definitely talking about a minority of xbox owners here.

    11. Re:Halo by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      Quite a few of the earlier xbox consoles used Thompson DVD drives. These are horrible. They can't read CD-Rs at all, and they can't even read many cdrws. Plus they get disk read errors a lot. When playing Halo 2, mine freezes for second at a time when choosing a profile, changing game options, and other times in the menu. Of course, I've had my GCN dvd drive stop working too. Pretty much all consoles have had problems reading game media.

    12. Re:Halo by usernotfound · · Score: 2, Insightful

      surround sound? i've had maybe 7 or 8 people bring their xbox over to my apartment to hook it up to my HDTV and surround sound. aparently NOBODY had any clue they have to buy something else to get surround sound. atleast the PS2 has a built in optical connector. that's true support: not having to buy something else.

      --
      You call it excessive, I call it ambitious.
    13. Re:Halo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god! Paying $20 for Optical digital audio AND Component video connectors! The HUMANITY.

      Christ, the Component dongle for PS2 alone costs more...

  24. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    >The starter package for the 360 is just a complete joke.

    You're assuming that everyone who will buy a 360 is an online gaming uber geek. MS may well want to target the sleek model at normal human beings who could be persuaded to get due to it having a lot MORE features than your average DVD player.

    i suppose you also think that two slice toasters are "dumb" when there are four sliced bsd powered models available.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  25. Now I wonder how soon... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    ...till we see games "This game doesn't work with XBOX 360 Basic. XBOX 360 Extended version required."

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Now I wonder how soon... by Khuffie · · Score: 1
      http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3142883

      As a side effect, with the possible exception of certain massively multiplayer online games, no Xbox 360 game will explicitly require use of the hard drive. Microsoft says no other aspect of the next-generation experience will be hampered without a hard drive; Xbox Live as a whole will function as usual, though it's likely downloadable content (and any music or photos you store digitally) would easily exceed the 64MB Memory Unit.

  26. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, in other words, bait and switch.

    --
    ... I'm addicted to placebos
  27. HD not as integral as most people put it out to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the current gen xboxes, i'd reckon most consumers barely fill up 100mb so of their HD. Your saves can always be 'saved' on the memory cards.

    Given the pricing, the $399 version is a no brainer. Decent after market accessories (controllers, headsets, and remote controls that don't suck) are already are priced around $20+ each for these things.

  28. Link to real article by larsoncc · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Link to real article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the la times must be the most boring newspaper ever. all their stories are exactly the same!


      The story you requested is available only to registered members.

      Registration is FREE and offers great benefits.

      Click here to register if you are not a registered member of latimes.com.

      Classifieds and Marketplace do NOT require registration.


      goddamn, hire some writers or something.

  29. how lame is this by jgionet · · Score: 1

    why on gods good earth would they release a model without a HD? Having a hard drive in it is the BEST thing for a console. Even sony realized this with ths Playstation and Nintendo will eventually wakeup and realise the same thing. I for one won't be buying the non-hd model as I find it to be a waste of money.

    1. Re:how lame is this by Trepalium · · Score: 2, Informative

      The same Sony that removed the hard drive bay from the new slim PS2s? Frankly, unless you were playing FFXI, the PS2 hard drive was practically useless. The only people who ever really made use of a hard drive in their PS2 were people using HDLoader/HDAdvance to load PS2 games onto it and run them off there.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
  30. Pricing by kent,+knower+of+all · · Score: 1


    Considering what one's buying, I think the price points are about $100 too high. Not that I'll be buying either one, but I think that the prices should be closer to:

    $199 for starter system
    $299 for complete system

    1. Re:Pricing by menor · · Score: 1

      They're waiting to drop the prices until the PS3 comes out, so they look like they're giving more for less (or equal).

    2. Re:Pricing by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      Welcome to 2005, things cost more now. $199? Thats how much the gas costs for Microsoft to ship it to your EBX.

      /Except back to school deals at Dell! Computers for cheap cheap cheap. blech.

    3. Re:Pricing by kent,+knower+of+all · · Score: 1


      It wasn't that long ago that Walmart's out-the-door price for a complete desktop PC was $199. Complete with O/S.

      They raised the price to $299 (adding $100 of additional profit) when they realized that they simply couldn't keep them on the shelves at the lower price.

      The point is, the MS box is a complete cookie-cutter operation. Certainly they can be profitably built and sold for far less than the boxes that Walmart was selling.

    4. Re:Pricing by Dominatus · · Score: 1

      Umm...how so?

      The XBox contains a powerful CPU and a very powerful GPU. Both of these cost money in research, development and production. The cost of an Xbox is not just the cost of its parts. You need to pay your engineers too.

      In the days where an expensive GPU costs 500 dollars an expensive CPUs cost over 1000 dollars, comparing the new Xbox to a PC with probably integrated graphics, or at most a GeForce2 and a low end CPU is ridiculous. It's like saying Why cant Alienware sell their machines for $299 like walmart?"

    5. Re:Pricing by dyefade · · Score: 1

      Do you think Microsoft haven't already thought about it? They're not (unlike you!) just some guy going "...hmmm, I think the XBox should be $299 for the basic system and $399 for the complete one..."

      Market forces will have major impact on the pricing of the system, and not least of those (as others have repeated), the release timing and projected price of the PS3.

      While everyone's opinion matters, how can you just say "MS are wrong", when they will surely have spent a small fortune (by other standards) just deciding how much to charge.

    6. Re:Pricing by Criterion · · Score: 1

      It may be a cookie-cutter unit, but the ingredients to make this particular cookie are expensive indeed. Rather, I should say, when you find a triple core PowerPC processor computer, with a next gen (not currently available) GPU available at Wally World for $299, let us all know, cause we'll ALL be there.

      This thing literally smokes any pc or mac made today.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  31. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Nairoz · · Score: 1

    In other words, sell as many consoles as possible... the trick is, people still need to buy games for them.

    --
    Just another harmless drunk
  32. DUMB idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If history has shown us anything about consoles, it's that developers won't utilize a hardware feature unless it's in EVERY SINGLE CONSOLE. I'd expect limited use of the hard drive ... saved games only? Whee.

  33. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by akhomerun · · Score: 2, Informative

    the memory sticks go in the controllers..

    no, seriously, the memory sticks go in the console.

    The Xbox 360

    The Xbox 360 Controller (left)

  34. Xbox is now dead by mrshowtime · · Score: 0, Troll

    I thought I was hearing good things about the 360. I though Microsoft was actually going to have a huge advantage via using Xbox live to download new content, levels, games, etc, but now that's gone. I was hearing all sorts of cool things about being able to design your own games/levels and being able to share via Xbox live. That's gone too...

    I don't see how saving essentially $10, or less, now by omitting the harddrive and then charging a $100 more to get it, will drive sales. Has Microsoft forgotten that a $399.99 system will not sell, even in 2005. Also M$ has forgotten that the a-holes at the game stores will jack up the price of the system by putting everything into "packs" so that $399 system will end up costing $599 if you want one anytime soon.

    I keep on hearing that M$ is going to use solid state memory. If so, I don't see how it could be any cheaper than a hard drive.

    I don't understand why M$ seems to be pulling their punches, they only have $40 BILLION dollars in the bank.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    1. Re:Xbox is now dead by SeekerDarksteel · · Score: 1

      Has Microsoft forgotten that a $399.99 system will not sell, even in 2005.

      It won't? Damn, I should ask you for the numbers to next weeks lottery drawing. While we're at it, who's going to win the Superbowl this year?

      No, but seriously, you're basing this on what now? A single console? Released several years ago? Not exactly a mountain of evidence for your claim.

      --
      The laws of probability forbid it!
    2. Re:Xbox is now dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When have people EVER bought a console for $400? EVER? You cock.

    3. Re:Xbox is now dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. $400 for a new system, more with any games... you'd be looking atleast $460 + tax out the door. I think the true hardcore XBox gamers wouldn't have an issue with this, but the parents of the kids who want one, etc, etc.. wouldn't be spending that much on it. Most college students who are trying to live in an apartment and make ends meet (who can't get mommy and daddy's money).. that's nearly a whole months rent.

      If Microsoft was able to sell the XBox 360 for $299, you'd be looking $360 +tax which is a little bit easier to swollow. Remember what age group is the biggest player of video games dollar wise... it's the same as the college age/just got out of college age groups. And those people don't have alot of $$ and are most like trying to pay back loans.

    4. Re:Xbox is now dead by phxbadash · · Score: 1

      OR....instead of selling the 20 gb hard-drive for $100 they will sell a larger one than the standard 20GB, so that anyone who wants to buy the bigger HD right from the start pay $299 for the console and pick up the larger hard to go with it.

    5. Re:Xbox is now dead by SeekerDarksteel · · Score: 1

      Sega Saturn. Alright, more than "several years", but meh.

      --
      The laws of probability forbid it!
    6. Re:Xbox is now dead by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Sega Saturn. Alright, more than "several years", but meh.

      Also 3DO, Philips CDi, and Neo Geo AES. No console has ever sold well at a launch price above $300.

      Of course, if you factor inflation into the mix, different story. But $300 is a psychological barrier, not really a financial one (most people who can afford $300 can afford $400 just as well).

      I'm not sure if MS is smart or not with this, though, because it's allowing them to stay below that psychological barrier with the cheap model while still offering a higher-end model that is presumably more profitable (or at least less unprofitable). But, at the same time, it has convinced me and at least a few other people to hold off, wait until the price drops, and wait until they give up on segmenting the market (which they will eventually). I'm no longer interested in picking up a system at launch - their original Xbox power supply problems had almost convinced me to wait anyway and this pushed me over the edge.

    7. Re:Xbox is now dead by Why's_This_Fish_So_B · · Score: 1

      No, buy the HD-less one, wait for one of a dozen techie sites to 'reveal' that the HDD of the more expensive one is actually just a standard notebook drive, install your own (larger) drive and copy a disk image onto it.

      As for me, nuts to XBox; I'm not buying a new console until I can get one with one or another of the HD DVDs (blue or red ray) as the drive.

  35. Another assault on the working poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reserving usability for the rich, leaving the poor without headsets - leaving them with lower scores in the games, leaving the poor out of clans that extensively use voice communication. It's clear that Microsoft is classist.

  36. IGN has more info by fixmyship · · Score: 3, Informative

    The IGN article has more info on the differences in the two versions. http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/642/642656p1.html/

    1. Re:IGN has more info by sriram_2001 · · Score: 2, Informative
  37. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by op12 · · Score: 0, Troll

    At this rate you'll have to by 3 versions of each of the 3 consoles before you retire...and possibly more!

  38. Ignoring the inherant dangers... by HaloZero · · Score: 1, Insightful

    From being a first-adopter of this technology, what games will be available at release? I could almost see this being a system where it's game development will fall horribly short, just because the hardware is being rushed out the door. The sooner the Xbox360 is placed on the market, the faster software developers will have to force their code through QA and proper testing to try and make the retail launch date. Anyone remember KotoR for Xbox? Not the best example, but it didn't have to be. That game had so many little glitches and bugs, that if you turned around a corner too fast, it took a dump in your lap. Hope you saved within ten footsteps! That, or have absolutely no titles on the shelves next to the console, which is kinda primo retarted when you think about it.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:Ignoring the inherant dangers... by BackInIraq · · Score: 2, Funny

      That, or have absolutely no titles on the shelves next to the console, which is kinda primo retarted when you think about it.

      All these young whippersnappers whining about launch titles...back in my day, you were lucky if there were ANY launch titles, dammit. You bought the console, took it home, hooked it to the TV, and waited. And you liked it, dammit! Just kept the damn thing dusted, because you knew the titles would come out someday.

      Okay, maybe that's a little over the top. But am I the only one who remembers the days of single-digit launch titles? Where you counted yourself lucky to have MULTIPLE launch titles?

      Maybe I'm just old :).

    2. Re:Ignoring the inherant dangers... by Saeul · · Score: 1

      Knights of the Old Republic (Xbox) only died on me a couple of times. The more important "feature" of KOTOR was that it would ONLY save to the xbox hard drive. The save files were too big (even one) to save on the xbox memory card.

      While I'll easily stipulate that it was unnecessary to have a save file that was that large, something tells me that Bioware found it convenient.

    3. Re:Ignoring the inherant dangers... by fowlerserpent · · Score: 1

      KotOR was released long after the Xbox launched. Perhaps it was rushed, but it has nothing to do with the Xbox launch being rushed.

    4. Re:Ignoring the inherant dangers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah let's forget about the problems in the original playstation where you had to turn the first gen upside down to get it to play through videos. the first gen ps2 also is plagued with the Disc Read Errors. quite a large number of various versions have problems reading either the blue or silver games and you can find tons of message board posts claiming you should turn the ps2 on it's side or put duct tape on the top of the blue discs.

      and strange, i've never had any problems with KotoR on the xbox.

    5. Re:Ignoring the inherant dangers... by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 1

      Nice try spreading the FUD:

      1) XBox launch date: November 8th, 2001.
      2) KOTOR release date: July 16th, 2003.

      Almost 2 years after the XBox launch. Knights may have been buggy, but it was most definitely not a launch title.

      Further, Knights didn't crash in the way you described. I've played hundreds of hours of it (beaten it on both the light and dark side), and while it wasn't perfect, the engine didn't just crash randomly.

      The only serious showstopper bug that everyone can agree upon involved wearing the invisibility belt, and then entering a scripted conversation. The character with which you were speaking would often fail his saving throw vs. your invisibility, and would not continue the conversation, forcing players to restart.

      The XBox launch had its faults (lack of must-play titles, uncomfortable controllers, no third-party peripherals, shitty thompson DVD drives), as did KOTOR, but the one has little to do with the other.

      --
      Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    6. Re:Ignoring the inherant dangers... by wgaryhas · · Score: 1

      It isn't a saving throw, it was an opposed skill check between one character's stealth and the other character's awareness.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
    7. Re:Ignoring the inherant dangers... by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the clarification.

      --
      Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    8. Re:Ignoring the inherant dangers... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      KOTOR made like a laptop hibernating and the save file was just a dump of RAM.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    9. Re:Ignoring the inherant dangers... by tulak_horde · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clearing that up. I don't remember KOTOR 1 ever freezing or crashing on me, but I did have some problems wit KOTOR 2 after I'd put many hours into it.

    10. Re:Ignoring the inherant dangers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm just old :).

      Nah, we remember the PSP launch just fine.

    11. Re:Ignoring the inherant dangers... by wgaryhas · · Score: 1

      you're welcome

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
  39. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

    You might want to go look at the pictures of the console at the official XBox 360 website. There are two slots on the front of the console labled "Memory Unit A" and "Memory Unit B". I think it's safe to assume that that these two slots will be used for memory sticks.

  40. Wireless controllers by Winterblink · · Score: 1

    I'm largely leaning towards the PS3 for the next-gen consoles, but one of the features that always caught my attention with the 360 was the wireless controllers. I know the PS3 will support the same thing, but Microsoft made such a big hoo-hah about this during their unveiling I figured it would be a standard feature at launch, for any package.

    It's pretty disappointing they're making people shell out another hundred bucks to buy a launch package that includes a wireless controller (presumably they can be bought separate, but good luck finding one at launch).

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:Wireless controllers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wireless = control lag. End of story, unless you want to prove that a transmit/receive sequence is faster than electricity down a wire.

      Thought not ;-)

    2. Re:Wireless controllers by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Given there's lots of talk about the PS3 being an expensive console, and that it will be worth it because it will have a 10 year lifecycle (I'm assuming that's in the same way the PS one is just hitting it's end of lifecycle), I wouldn't bank on the PS3 coming any cheaper...

  41. It just works by Jakhel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since there will be different versions of the XBox 360, does that mean that console game makers will now be putting "system requirements" on console games?

    Wasn't one of the main reasons people said they preferred console games to PC games because they didn't have to worry about their system being able to handle running the game? Because it "just works"? Now console gamers have to be mindful of system requirements as well.

    1. Re:It just works by Shadarr · · Score: 1

      There have been games in the recent generation that had system requirements: Crystal Chronicles and the GBA/link cable, various online games that required a network adapter and in some cases an external harddrive. Any of the EyeToy games. I doubt that a lot of games will require the HDD, and certainly nobody is going to require the headset. More likely games will work on both systems but it will run faster (with caching) or have free updates if you have a HDD.

    2. Re:It just works by green453 · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone calling this two different versions of the same console? In reality, there aren't two different versions, there are two different accessory packages. Think back to the days when you could buy a NES or Genesis with two different sets of accessories. One would be the "core" (budget) version and included only a controller. If you spent more, you could get an accessory package with some other goodies. It wasn't market segmentation then and it isn't market segmentation now. Even if the HDD is made a requirement for some games, it still isn't market segmentation, it is just a required accessory such as the memory expansion pack for the N64. It's a bit overzealous to claim that requiring a certain accessory will fragment the market and make the console unusable. THe memory expansion pack on the N64 is the perfect example certainly didn't have this effect, but it did increase the playability of the console. Anyway, just my two cents.

    3. Re:It just works by nburatovich · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Console game system requirements are nothing new. The N64 had a RAM Expansion Pack that was required for some features in certain games. In Perfect Dark, for example, one could not even play the single player scenario without the RAM expansion. I'm sure this was a reason, albeit a smaller one, why Perfect Dark never sold as well as Goldeneye despite its notable improvements, marketing hype, and acclaim.

      The case with the Xbox 2 "Plus" model (my name, not theirs) is somewhat different. What the Plus model offers are more accessories than required parts. You don't need a wireless controller, a wireless headset, or a patch cable to play single-player games right now. These are extras targeted to the multiplayer crowd, or more specifically, to the Xbox Live crowd. The lack of a hard drive in the base model is really the only drawback, but as many have noted, its uses are primarily relegated to game saves or custom soundtracks. Only a few developers such as Bungie have taken advantage of the hard drive in the Xbox to do things like better level-loading.

      What MS has done here is marketing, and I believe good marketing at that. Rather than sell a single unit with a bunch of premium accessories for $400, a price I believe the console market would find hard to accept, they have given consumers a choice depending on what they want and can afford. I would not be surprised if at some point down the line they sold the accessories that come with the $400 unit as an "Accessory Pack" upgrade for people who have the $300 unit, given that the HD is detachable. Consider: Xbox Live will be free on weekends to non-subscribers. Surely many owners of the $300 unit will have a patch cable and a broadband connection and will check it out sometime. I think MS is counting on downloadable content and the multiplayer experience to sell the accessories in the $400 unit to people who go for the $300 unit early on.

    4. Re:It just works by lilmofo · · Score: 1

      If game developers attempt to leverage the differences between the various flavors, then I think you're right. But I think they'll make a concerted effort to run the other way. I seriously doubt that you'll see many (if *any*) games that absolutely require a hard drive. Its presence may enhance your game playing experience (downloadable content, integration of legally obtained digital music [wink, wink], etc.) but it won't preclude you from just playing the game. Besides, any developer creating a game for both Xbox 360 and PS3 would be crazy to base his design around the use of a hard drive. And the rest of the differences between the proposed models shouldn't have any effect on game play (wireless controller, wireless headset, etc.)

  42. Same Mistake by Antimatter3009 · · Score: 1

    When Sony announced that their basic console would not ship with an HD everyone jumped on them because developers would be less inclined to use functionality that not everyone would have. The original Xbox had a huge advantage in this because developers could always expect the HD to be present, and therefore would use it well, whereas the PS2's HD was barely ever used because not everyone had one. I really think both of them are misstepping by having more than one version of their console. If I want to worry about my hardware I go to my computer. I expect all my console games to just work. Really, of the big three this gen, Nintendo is the only one doing things right so far (and this is coming from someone who owns an Xbox and PS2, but no Gamecube).

  43. This is what you get... by Bogtha · · Score: 1

    This is what you get when you let a computer company like Microsoft build a console instead of an appliance company like Sony.

    This kind of schism will not bother those of us who are used to dealing with computers and their various configurations, but it will alienate everyone who expects their console to be an appliance that Just Works[tm].

    The only reason people put up with the myriad configurations computers can come in is because a) requirements vary drastically and b) it's the way it's always been. Neither of these are true in the case of gaming consoles.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    1. Re:This is what you get... by radish · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting comment given that the original Xbox had a HDD and ethernet built in from day 1, whilst the PS2 had them both as additional "upgrades" (of varying success). I see this move by MS with the 360 as somewhat backwards, but they're just repeating a mistake Sony already made.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  44. Marketing responsible? by OK+PC · · Score: 1

    The only point of the basic package is so they can say "look we made the $299 price mark!" But without a hard drive, they've pretty much shot themselves in the foot. The proper console is $399, hard drive is not standard, so Sony must be laughing all the way to the bank. Which is a shame because I actually thought Microsoft were going to do something special

    --
    Did you get that thing I sent ya?
  45. Official Pricing by cmarks03 · · Score: 1

    Just saw this while reading the page /. linked to. This is official. http://www.pro-g.co.uk/news/nid/1307/ $299 for core package. $399 for better package.

    --
    Peace, Chris
    1. Re:Official Pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just linked to the same fucking page as the article, moron.

    2. Re:Official Pricing by cmarks03 · · Score: 1

      If you look closely, it's a different page. Read more closely and register Mr. Anonymous Coward.

      --
      Peace, Chris
  46. so wait. by bk_veggie · · Score: 1

    if both my friend and i buy the 'cheap' model, we can't play two player games at eachothers house, because it only has one controller input? Brilliant!

  47. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by payndz · · Score: 1
    I'm just going to buy all three and retire.

    I'm afraid that to afford all three on launch day (plus a game/memory card for each) you'll have to use every last penny in your retirement fund. Hope you enjoy supermarket own-brand beans!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  48. Sony... by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why M$ seems to be pulling their punches, they only have $40 BILLION dollars in the bank.

    You say that as if Sony didn't also have a massive war chest for just such a situation

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  49. Target market? Playstation owners by belgar · · Score: 1

    I'm a little slow on the uptake on this one, but the more I think about it (and after seeing a pic of the topside of the wireless controller), the more I realize this machine is made to capture the mindshare of current playstation owners -- not satisfy current xbox owners.
     
    Look at a few of the features that are different from the original xbox:

    - Memory card slots in the front (which I hate seeing there -- I'd pay $100 for a model that *didn't* have these on the front of the box)

    - FOUR trigger buttons instead of two

    - OPTIONAL hard drive

    These are all "features" that PS 1/2 owners are used to. More familiarity, lower barrier to entry for switchers, blah blah.
     

    --
    What does it mean to wake out of a dream
    and be wearing someone else's shorts?
    BNL, Born on a Pirate Ship (1998)
    1. Re:Target market? Playstation owners by British · · Score: 1

      Where's the trigger buttons on my PS2 controller? It seems every game console had nice true analog buttons except for the PS2. Those analog triggers make for nice gas & brake pedals.

      I don't see what the fuss is about. The NES I believe had a 3-tier package system, (light gun + exercise pad + maybe ROB?), and nobody complained.

    2. Re:Target market? Playstation owners by Dhaos · · Score: 1

      About the light gun, exercise pad, and ROB...

      Exactly how many games ever got made to make use of those?

      Very few. Very very few.

      Aside from that, most people, I think, envision the harddrive as being more functional than any of those addons- if its useless, why bother to get it at all?

      --
      It's not what you know, or even who you know- It's how many people recognize your damn .sig
    3. Re:Target market? Playstation owners by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      You confuse analog trigger buttons, with regular push buttons.

      The analog buttons on the XBox (as on the Dreamcast, N64, and Gamecube) make for awesome brake/gas pedals.

    4. Re:Target market? Playstation owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remind me again of how the N64 had an analog button? I'm sure that the Z-button was just a regular button. Nintendo even made a big deal over GCN's "Innovative" analog triggers.

  50. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Trigun · · Score: 1

    Considering the last Xbox branded Ethernet cable that I saw was $35 dollars CDN for a 5 metre cable, they should be able to knock down the price a bit more.

  51. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought you needed a Monster Cable Xbox Ethernet Cable to get the most out of Live. Your bits simply don't flow as smoothly through brand-X cables.

  52. Stupid! by dr.banes · · Score: 1

    Dumbest idea I've ever heard of. This will just cause confusion, and at launch thats not a good thing. I'd rather see a $350.00 version at launch with everything included. Then 6 mos-1yr down the line release a 249.00-299.00 stripped down version.If one thing Sony has right is consistency and a much better advertising/PR firm than M$.

  53. Dumbest thing MS can do by ahhell · · Score: 1

    Does none of these companies look at the past mistakes of other companies? Christsake....360 with no hard drive is just going to be a fancy PS2. Someone needs to kick the all marketing guys at MS in balls repeatedly. I'd be first in line. What dumbasses!!!

  54. Go PS3! by ActionAL · · Score: 1

    Don't buy a XBOX360 you crazies! We need to purchase the PS3 in order to make sure Microsoft is utterly slaughtered in this next gen video game system competition.

    1. Re:Go PS3! by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      Why?

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    2. Re:Go PS3! by Criterion · · Score: 1

      I got no problem buying my "toys" from MS. They make good toys. I don't trust them with my pc so I keep 'em outta there, but they can make my toys.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  55. Wait, so... by dividedsky319 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So lets see here...

    Two different versions... And the more expensive version doesn't even come with a wireless adapter... that's another HUNDRED bucks.

    Baaaaaaad move on Microsoft's part. Out of fear that their games won't sell as well, publishers are going to have to design their games to not need the hard drive... either that, or everyone without a hard drive is going to have an expensive paperweight when games still require the hard drive.

    This is going to lead to a fragmentation of the Xbox owning public, which is a bad thing for everybody... the consumer, and the gaming companies.

  56. It's the new fad: Tiger on Xbox360 by TsukasaZero · · Score: 0

    Who's with me?

  57. mod parent down by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1

    The Xbox360, as well as the Xbox before it, will have memory sticks. While the hard drive is nice, it is not "key" to the Xbox. Also, he states that it lacks Ethernet, which is untrue. The article simply states that the more expensive version of the Xbox360 will include an Ethernet CABLE packaged with it.

    --
    Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
  58. Pricing FYI by AnotherEscobar · · Score: 1
    For our Australian friends, thats...

    • 388.665 AUD for the basic unit
    • 518.653 AUD for the more advanced one
    • And no, there are no plans to ship with Pokie software
    1. Re:Pricing FYI by Blurredplacebo · · Score: 1

      mod parent up

      cheers muchly for this info $518 for the proper system is far less than i was expecting

    2. Re:Pricing FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that he's got the cents out to three decimal places, I wouldn't count on his prices. They appear to just be currency conversions.

      If I were you, I'd still expect to pay more than the US price for the console.

  59. Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I have the choice of either getting a system which I need to spend more money on to uncripple or one that comes with a bunch of junk I won't use.

  60. Why not allow us to use our own external HDD's? by blankoboy · · Score: 1

    Why are we bullied into paying $100US to get the add on HDD plus other crap? Why doesn't the high and mighty allow us to use an external USB 2.0 HDD or our own? Many of us surely have HDD's laying around that could be used. The Xbox360 has the USB2.0 ports.... So, this will be 3 or possibly 4 iterations of the XB360? 1. XB360 doorstop $299 2. XB360 deluxe (the one we thought were all getting) $399 3. XB360 doorstop w/ bolt on HD DVD drive cos they didn't get it right the 1st time $399 4. XB360 deluxe + HD DVD $499 ??? I will stick with my PC for now thanks. Having enough fun already and I don't need to shell out a motherload of $$$.

    1. Re:Why not allow us to use our own external HDD's? by cornface · · Score: 0

      The obvious answer is so they don't have to worry about supporting people's bargain basement gimp hardware that they've had laying on a shelf in the garage for six years or has weird compatibility problems they couldn't anticipate.

      Also, to make more money.

  61. Well, if some random newspaper speculated it... by batkiwi · · Score: 0

    ...it MUST be true.

    Where do they get this shit?

    1. Re:Well, if some random newspaper speculated it... by boarder · · Score: 1

      Gee, I don't know where they got it...

      Maybe it was from the official press release that MS said would be put out today? Everyone who follows console gaming knew that this morning at 9:30am EST MS would be announcing the pricing of the system. I could link you to IGN, Kotaku, Joystiq, LA Times, etc. I won't, though, because I'm lazy.

      Here's the thing: most newspapers don't just "speculate" things they print. If they do, then they say that some analyst predicts it. This isn't saying that. This is saying the official price is out. And, actually, the originally linked article didn't even say that; it said that LA Times said that (why the /. editors allowed a post from some guy linking to his own website that generates ad revenue and then just says the LA Times says something, I'll never know). If you read the link, at the bottom there is a link to the official press release info.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
  62. And Sony will (most likely) ... by vlad_petric · · Score: 1
    just cut the price of PS2 to 99$.

    Moral: don't just write off the current leader of the market yet.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:And Sony will (most likely) ... by KillShill · · Score: 1

      and it would still be overpriced.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  63. individual unit sale by parasite · · Score: 0

    The two Xbox 360 package may not be what the consumers want -- I mean who buys videos with a friend ? And a bit pricey at $299, but the thing is none of this matters nor needs to be debated. You can be CERTAIN that Ebay sellers will buy these suckers in bulk, at a discount, and then resell individual units for as little as $160. A smattering more for the convenience of being able to buy one X-box. Now the only thing to worry about is the LAWSUITS sure to ensue when Microsoft decides they have violated their seller agreement by not selling two Xboxen together. *sigh*

  64. They'll have me taking a look at it by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I don't like MS. It's OS Family is a risk to man and mouse in every corporate enviroment and their monopoly in OSes has been holding back IT innovation for years. Day in and day out I have to deal with trouble caused by MS Windows 'insecurity by design'.
    However, the Windows Family does have a reputation as a gaming OS. I use it to play WoW (my current iBook is to weak for large crowds and Transgaming is to much fuss).
    Yet this XBox has one thing I've been desperately missing on consoles: Hassle free VGA support. That's why I will check it out.
    But since the Nintendo Revoultion is gonna be something like twice as powerfull I'll wait for that one before making any buying decisions.
    It's like everybody said: Maybe if MS can get their hardware as predictable as Apple has theirs and keep a grip on their computer gaming stronghold at the same time they might even stay the 400 pound gorilla they are right now. And - imagine that - build good products too!

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  65. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is this: If not everyone's console comes with a hard drive, not every game will use it. In fact, I worry that a majority of developers will avoid implementing features that the kids and the price conscious will not be able to access. Why build HD access into a game where 50%+ can't use it, and therefore don't buy the game? It's shooting yourself in the foot right from the getgo. Can you think of any other console add-on that turned out to be anything more than a sideshow?

  66. PPC Linux by christurkel · · Score: 1

    Personally I'm excited at this. I wonder how it will take PPC Linux to be ported to it?

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    1. Re:PPC Linux by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      I'm slightly more interested in PS3. Not because of technical superiority; the new Xbox seems like a more conventional multiproc machine, versus the new fancy Cell arch, so the 360 is more likely easier to program for at this point. On the other hand, the PS3 seems a lot more Linux friendly; there's already Cell code in the vanilla kernel sources, contributed by IBM, and the PS3 is reputed to have Linux on the hard drive.

      I think buying a PS3 will send a better message about interest in Linux, than buying anything Microsoft. Of course Sony is not the most Linux-friendly company around, but in this case they are much better than Microsoft.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  67. No Suprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't feel like digging it up, but I'm pretty sure I recall the 360 folks telling developers to design their games as if there were no hard drive. At that point, I was already sure a version without a HD was in the plans, despite thinking it is a horrible move.

  68. M$ already sells memory sticks by solomonrex · · Score: 1

    No one cares because of the hard drive, but there's another way to look at this:

    Their core demographic is the lan party boys who already have like 3 extra hard drives laying around, propping up their couch in the garage. They'll just purchase this, pop a hard drive in and buy a special wireless NFL controller. They already have a headset.

  69. Remember when DualShock came out? by LanMan04 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Something similar happened when the original DualShock controllers came out for the original PlayStation. I remember picking up Ape Escape, and seeing the big warning on the back "THIS GAME REQUIRES A DUALSHOCK CONTROLLER" on the back. I figured it out, but then again I also read Slashdot.

    If M$ has ONE thing different between the systems (like HD vs no HD), then maybe people will be able to tell whether a game will work or not. Add more required unknowns (Headset? Broadband?) and the whole thing will go to hell.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:Remember when DualShock came out? by satoshi1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The DualShock is a controller, though. It costs, what, $30 at most?

    2. Re:Remember when DualShock came out? by jsantos · · Score: 1

      If M$ has ONE thing different between the systems (like HD vs no HD), then maybe people will be able to tell whether a game will work or not. Add more required unknowns (Headset? Broadband?) and the whole thing will go to hell.


      Or they could sell all the extras in one package. Actually I think the games will just have extras if you have the required piece of hardware, the same way nowadays you can play Live if you have broadband.
      --
      This signature intentionally left blank
  70. Ethernet cable by zdzichu · · Score: 1

    OMG, what a deal! They give one meter of cat5 with two rj45!

    --
    :wq
  71. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by guruevi · · Score: 1

    That is the package you will buy to run Linux (LiveCD) on and you will put your own 500G HD in it and connect your ethernet with a wireless USB adaptor! Microsoft thinks about us, hackers that want to run Linux on XBox

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  72. Forget XBox by TarryTops · · Score: 0, Troll

    and get yourself PSP or the Playstation 3 http://www.ps3land.com/.

    --
    Java Oracle Linux Enthusiast
  73. versions by rayde · · Score: 1
    with rumors of different "versions" of the Xbox 360 being released in the future, i'm hoping that they continue to be just different "packages", rather than actually fundamentally different. For example, if someone can only buy the $299 model, they can always buy those add-ons to give them the same functionality of the $399 model later.

    my worry is if they release a HD-DVD capable model in the future... will those who bought the early generation xbox 360's be restricted in their game selection, or will there be some type of upgrade path available? or will Microsoft be strict and say that no games can use the HD-DVD functionaly, only movies?

  74. From the article: by guruevi · · Score: 1

    The many peripherals will retail for the following: * Faceplate ($19.99, 19.99 Euros, 14.99 GBP) * Hard Drive (20 GB) ($99.99, 99.99 Euros, 69.99 GBP) * Memory Unit (64 MB) ($39.99, 34.99 Euros, 22.99 GBP) * Wireless Networking Adapter ($99.99, 79.99 Euros, 59.99 GBP) * Wireless Controller ($49.99, 44.99 Euros, 32.99 GBP) * Play and Charge Kit ($19.99, 19.99 Euros, 14.99 GBP) * Rechargeable Battery Pack ($11.99, 14.99 Euros, 9.99 GBP) * Controller ($39.99, 34.99 Euros, 24.99 GBP) * Headset ($19.99, 19.99 Euros, 14.99 GBP) * Universal Media Remote ($29.99, 29.99 Euros, 19.99 GBP) * Component HD AV Cable ($39.99, 29.99 Euros, 19.99 GBP) * S-Video AV Cable (US) ($29.99) * SCART AV Cable (Europe) (24.99 Euros, 17.99 GBP) * VGA HD AV Cable ($39.99, 29.99 Euros, 19.99 GBP) $100 for a 20G HD!!!!! They still have to get rid of those pesky drives from the original XBox??

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  75. Stability issues by solomonrex · · Score: 1

    No, his daughter meant it's unstable when placed on a small entertainment center. It'll tip the shelf over.

    And seriously, all I hear from the programmer guys around here is about Halo, Halo 2, etc. And Madden. They are the best-sellers.

  76. Re: extended game play by Eric+Coleman · · Score: 1

    What If you don't want wireless? What if you play rpg's for hours on end and want the comfort your control won't run out of batteries,...

    Wireless controllers could save your life! Don't you know that people die from playing video games for more than 36 hours? Or what if you're playing a flight simulator and you get a blood clot in your leg from sitting still for 2 hours and it travels to your brain! And you die! Oh my god your brain!

    On a more serious note, the whole enchilada does seem a bit expensive to me. Given that the price per gigabyte these days is down to around $0.48USD for the largest models, I wouldn't want to pay more than $10 for a 20GB hard drive. Either way, both packages seem rather sour to me.

  77. Here's a thought... by Turken · · Score: 1

    Since the higher priced system is already "giving" $200 worth of accesories for only $100 more, why can't they just give $100 worth of accessories (the hard drive) for $0, and not create this massive split?

    Sure, you wouldn't get the wireless controller with your launch package, but I'm sure that many people would go and buy at least one more to have with the system. It worked for Nintendo with their wavebird controllers.

  78. Wireless Controllers Worth Any Price by davemabe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would pay $1000 to get rid of the mess of cables that I have with my current Xbox. What a mess!

    1. Re:Wireless Controllers Worth Any Price by radish · · Score: 1

      Well lucky you - for just $40 each you can get the excellent Logitech wireless controllers. I figured I just saved you $840. You're welcome!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Wireless Controllers Worth Any Price by Criterion · · Score: 1

      The cables in the front got nada to do with the cables in the back.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    3. Re:Wireless Controllers Worth Any Price by radish · · Score: 1

      I suggest you re-read the grandparent's subject line.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  79. Cable Conundrum by Heffenfeffer · · Score: 1
    Something I've noticed is that the 360 may not have a standard AV cable (I presume, since the 'Core' package has Standard AV cable (Composite?) as a feature.) I don't have a component-capable TV, and I imagine a lot of folks still don't. Heck, these days I see a large amount of composite->RF adapters out there.

    Thus, I imagine that folks are going to have to add $30 (the cheapest cable price I've seen so far) to the premium package's $400 if they own an old TV. Ach, these new consoles and their price gouging. Remember back when a game and two controllers were included in the package?

    1. Re:Cable Conundrum by Criterion · · Score: 1

      I am guessing that standard cables are included and the hd cables are added. I know the optional svid cables on the original had the standard cables built into them (all in one cable set) so I'm guessing it will be similar. They know they would piss alot of people off if they tried a scam like that.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  80. Because it doesn't make sense. by Corngood · · Score: 1

    People don't all want to play the same games, that's why DVD players don't come with media. They could include a coupon or something, but then we're really just talking about the price of the console.

    1. Re:Because it doesn't make sense. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Actually most consoles on sale come with one or two free games, and a lot of DVDs come with free DVDs (albeit crappy ones).

      When the PSP is released next month, the deal I get for preordering comes with 2 free games for example.

  81. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by tgrimley · · Score: 1

    "haven't heard of memory sticks for the xbox? Tell me, have you seen the front of the console??? The Memory Slots are RIGHT THERE!!" XBOX != XBOX 360

  82. DVD playback disabled on "basic" model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, without the remote, does this mean that the "basic" model Xbox 360 will have DVD playback disabled?

    Recall that the original Xbox had no DVD playback without the optional remote.

    1. Re:DVD playback disabled on "basic" model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still play DVDs and control them with the Xbox 360 controller (wired or not)

  83. What will they be called? by doublem · · Score: 1

    XBOX Home and XBOX Professional?

    I guess the Home edition won't be able to run most games reliably, or will run them with limited to no network support.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  84. Compatibility only for the plus system then ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since compatibility to Xbox1 was something that was said to be ongoing (most likely through downloads over the Live network), and the reliance of several Xbox1 titles of having a harddisk available, can we assume now that only the Xbox2++ (or Xbox360) will be compatible with XBox1 games, while the Xbox2-- (or Xbox359) will not be.. ?

    1. Re:Compatibility only for the plus system then ? by Criterion · · Score: 1

      The model with the hd will be a requirement for backwards compatibility. You wanna play Halo/Halo2? Don't even think twice. Get the bundle.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  85. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by turtled · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll get Nintendo Revolution (yep, I'm a fanboy). What I do like so far is that they have said virtually nothing; they are quietly learning from the other 2. On the other hand, Sony and M$ have over promised, built expectations and are figuring ways to under-deliver (such as M$'s backward compatabilies issues)

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
  86. HDD experience vs no HDD experience? by blankoboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So now we know that MS has taken us a step back in the 'next generation' of Xbox. We no longer have the HDD by defauult as we did with the first Xbox.

    Apparently developers are not coding games to 'require' the HDD but I'm guessing it will be used for caching to allow for faster load times.


    This begs the question, what will the gaming experience be like for a player who has the standard 'core' XB360 versus the person who paid MS an extra $100?


    Will the cheapskate player have a lesser game experience due to longer load times? What will happen in multiplayer games? Will the person who obviously has more $$ to line Bill's pockets get all the good weapons before the player who is less wealthy (thus giving the advantage to the rich player)?


    Next generation? More like, Next "iteration". Thanks so Microsoft. Ugh....

    1. Re:HDD experience vs no HDD experience? by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

      The answer is obvious. Game developers will make sure that those players with no hard drive notice the difference as little as possible, so that their game will hit the larger audience. This is basically guaranteeing that the X-Box 360 hard drive support in games is going to be almost useless aside from X-Box Live! content. And THAT means that the people who shelled out the extra $100 for the big package basically got screwed out of $100...

    2. Re:HDD experience vs no HDD experience? by blankoboy · · Score: 1

      I think that this is just wishful thinking on your part. The vast amounts of data for these 'next gen' games will definitely require adequate caching (HDD) for the load times to be fast enough.

    3. Re:HDD experience vs no HDD experience? by Criterion · · Score: 1

      I'm absolutely certain there WILL be games that require the hd. If you don't get one, there will be game/hd bundles available.

      I can also see that some games that are written to optionally take advantage of the hd will likely run faster/smoother in some places, perhaps loading levels faster, etc. This of course will be nulled in some way in multiplayer games, at least when played over Live, likely by the server code to keep all players on equal ground.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    4. Re:HDD experience vs no HDD experience? by Criterion · · Score: 1

      You're being a bit overly optimistic I think. For one thing, the hd will be REQUIRED for backwards compatibility. That, in itself, is worth well over $100 for me. There will be games that require the hd (who hasn't seen games from previous generation consoles that say "This game requires blah-blah optional hardware."), and there will be game/hd bundles available (or preferably, just coupons in said games for money off hd upgrade). I rekon Halo 3 will require the hd. Guess hd sales will go up next spring lol. Some games coming out will have MASSIVE levels (think Oblivion), and I personally can't see that running as transparently if there is no hd there.. longer load times for levels, etc.

      The crux of the whole matter is, the $299 package is nothing more than marketing, so MS can say they launched at $299. Nothing more. Sales will be slow on that model, and it likely won't last long until the only option is the model with the hd.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  87. am I the only one by ptrangerv8 · · Score: 1

    that noticed this is 299 Euro's?

    I'm curious to see what the US price will be..

  88. read the LA Times article: Microsoft Corp. said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-rup17.2aug17 ,1,6590232.story?ctrack=1&cset=true

    "Microsoft Corp. said its next-generation Xbox 360 game console would cost $299 to $399 when the device is launched this holiday season."

    The LA Times isn't theinquirer.net.

  89. Thank you Microsoft for your love of the UK by hattig · · Score: 1

    Low end: 209.99 United Kingdom Pounds = 380.016 United States Dollars

    I suppose that is only $323 when you take the VAT off though. Only $23 more than the US.

    High end: 279.99 United Kingdom Pounds = 506.648 United States Dollars

    which is $431 once VAT is removed.

  90. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

    The hard drive most likely will be used for what it is currently used for on the current xbox, music and saved games (also modding). I have known a few people who didn't see the point in having the hard drive because they could save the games on a memory stick and they don't keep music on their xbox.

  91. Actually by goldcd · · Score: 1

    the HD is in a little module that just clips on the side - the idea being that if you're going around to a friends you can just take that and the game with you for all your config stuff.
    The HD isn't some capacity monster because, it wouldn't be used, it would cost more, it's not a standard 3.5" like the XB1's. (I assume 1.8"). Earlier reports (I've no idea if they're true) are to be believed, MS are going to launch an iPod like device that can be clipped on the side that'll allow you to play your stored music whilst out and about as well - nice idea.

    1. Re:Actually by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Ohhh, not heard that before. That sounds cool :). Just take my hd and plug it into my buddies X360, not worrying about transferring stuff to and from the memory card, etc.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  92. $100 is expensive for all that. by Zangief · · Score: 1

    A wireless controller of first quality TODAY (the Wavebird) is worth $20. A Hard Disk is worth what? $40?

    The headset another $10. I can't believe they are counting the Ethernet cable in the offer. That should be free.

    MS will make a lot of money from this "offer"

    1. Re:$100 is expensive for all that. by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      Wireless HEADSET's today, for XBOX, cost around $70.

      If you get your information straight, you'd see that $100 for the extra's is not so bad, mostly due to the wireless headset.

    2. Re:$100 is expensive for all that. by McZiggz · · Score: 1

      gosh some people will never be pleased The first wavebird sold for like $50 when it came out The logitech wireless headset out now sells for $60-$80 an ethernet cable from BestBuy (where most console users would buy one) is a good $15 and a $40gb HDD is @ least $40 consumers could expect to pay roughly $200 retail for all that stuff. $100 is not that bad @all. However its rediculously stupid that M$ is even selling this as a seperate "option". Just release your console for $399 fully loaded and be done with it. This crap about optional hard drives really pisses me off.

    3. Re:$100 is expensive for all that. by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Don't get pissed off. It's just a marketing scam so MS can say they released the XB360 at $299. Ignore that option if it doesn't suit you (because believe me, you're far from alone.. I would suggest the $299 sales will be dire) and move on to some crazy fast console goodness :). Just pretend they never said it and get on with life.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  93. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by coopex · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
  94. Link is broken - here is the good link by BraceletWinner · · Score: 1
  95. Xbox backwardds compatibility by doctor_no · · Score: 1

    So I'm assuming XBox backwards compatibility is out for the Xbox360 then (at least for the $299 version). You would need to spend an extra $100 to get that feature (even though a Xbox goes for around $149 these days).

    I wish Microsoft was a little more upfront about all this. Instead of showing the wireless XB360 w/ HDD at E3, they could've showed a wired version too without a HDD. Since the original Xbox lauched for $299 with a HDD, people, such as myself, immeditely belived it would come with a HDD at that price-point. At E3 they made it sound like it would come standard, Sony was at least up front about this possibilty from the begining.

  96. Anybody else sorely disappointed in Live? by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    I doubt I'll be renewing it when my year is up (on the Xbox OR 360).

    Reguardless of what they advertise, it seems like a buncha swearing 14 year olds.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Anybody else sorely disappointed in Live? by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Yea, Live is terrible. I actually turned off voice communication in the Live dashboard, which made it slightly tolerable. I would say its the cesspool of the online gaming world, but then again, most of it seems to be a cesspool lately.

    2. Re:Anybody else sorely disappointed in Live? by rufo · · Score: 1

      How is the rest of online gaming any different?

      Seriously...

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
  97. For $400... by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

    ...Get a computer!! or the latest fancy video card

    --
    I got nothin'
    1. Re:For $400... by Criterion · · Score: 1

      HELL no. Then I would be forced to use Windows on my computer to play games. I'd rather buy a dedicated piece of hardware from MS to use as a toy than be forced to run that unholy piece of steaming crap on my pc. My plan is the same as with the Xbox, buy hardware new, because MS takes a loss on each one, then buy as many games as possible used, so they don't get another cut from the game sale. My plan has served me well so far, so no need to change it.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    2. Re:For $400... by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      So, your plan is to purchase a console and games that you obviously enjoy in a way that makes the M$ lose money, so that they don't make a next gen console since it is no longer profitable..... If you really don't like M$ products just don't buy them.

      --
      I got nothin'
  98. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by xonics · · Score: 2, Insightful

    whilst everyone has mentioned the ethernet and memory card aspects, i'd just like to take a moment and point something out:

    "unless they plan on selling memory sticks, which I haven't heard anything on yet"

    he's actually right...hold on squire, hear me out...they are not releasing 'memory sticks' because it doesn't use 'memory sticks' they use their own memory card. Why would they want to help Sony by using their 'memory sticks'?

    Incidently, yes the HD is key to the XBox, but not the 360.

    I think the starter package is just what is required, the softcore gamers don't want all the fancy pants wireless stuff, they just want to buy their kids the 'latest thing' without going overboard on price. I think MS have it right with this setup.

    --
    If you were me, then I'd be you, oh look breasts
  99. No Patching! by Shook18 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone is concerned about developers not being able to utilize the hard drive in the system, but think about it: half-assed games will not be able to be patched at a later date, which is a HUGE upside to the whole thing. Games will be fully finished by release day, not by "a few months later"!

  100. Mobile battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm... this looks interesting.

    Play and Charge Kit ($19.99, 19.99 Euros, 14.99 GBP)
    Rechargeable Battery Pack ($11.99, 14.99 Euros, 9.99 GBP)

  101. Usual ripoff outside of USA by dan+the+person · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft's next generation console, the Xbox 360, will cost $299 (£209) when it goes on sale at Christmas."

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4160076.stm

    299.00 USD = 165.302 GBP = 26% markup in UK

    BUT, US price is excluding sales tax?

    UK VAT = 17.5% so they are only ripping off UK customers by 8.5%

  102. Backwards compatitibility becomes more important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Become some Xbox 1 games use the HDD to cache data (and to download multiplayer maps), especially the hugely popular Halo 2 , a lot more of the $400 version will be sold, especially right at launch, as current Halo 2-playing Xbox owners line up to buy it.

  103. Lowest common denominator = most profit. by LordJezo · · Score: 1

    Why would game companies make something for people who can't play it if going for the lowest common denominator of console systems would yield the most profit? If they make a game for the non hard drive system both groups of users will get to play it and they get more sales. Hard drive games would reduce their market share, and companies usually don't like that with huge blockbuster console games.

    Addons always fail.. Sega-CD, Nintendo 64 Memory Pack.. they always end up being niche products.

  104. Beaver Prices by The+Patient · · Score: 1
    For those in the Great White North, the base unit is $399.99 and the whizbang model is $499.99 (the additional items with which it comes would cost about $300 separately).

    Prices on other doodads:

    20GB Hard Drive: $129.99
    64MB Memory Unit: $49.99
    Wireless Controller: $59.99
    Play & Charge Kit: $29.99
    Rechargeable Battery Pack: $14.99
    Wireless Networking Adapter: $129.99
    Headset: $29.99
    Universal Media Remote: $39.99
    S-Video AV Cable: $39.99
    VGA HD AV Cable: $49.99

  105. It's The Better Deal! by PRES_00 · · Score: 1
    According to IGN, this will be the better deal:

    Taking into account that a memory card ($39.99 U.S./?34.99/£22.99) is required for saving games, a headset ($19.99 U.S./?19.99/£14.99) is necessary for Xbox Live play, a second controller sells for $39.99 (?34.99/£24.99), and a remote goes for $29.99 (?29.99/£19.99), totaling $130, the premium price appears the better deal. The above tally doesn't include a MS HD, which costs an additional $99 (totaling $229).

  106. Conundrum Concluded by Heffenfeffer · · Score: 1

    I retract my earlier statement about the AV cables - after doing a little research, the Premium cable is compatible with composite TV's.

  107. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    299 is sub-200? All they are including is an ethernet cable...I'm pretty sure one of those can be found cheaper somewhere else...assuming you're not going to use the wireless addon anyways

  108. Revolution by eqisow · · Score: 1, Troll

    Awesome, now I know two things. How much money I'll be saving with my Revolution, and that I won't be missing a damn thing.

    I mean at first I was buying a Revolution on principle... because I strongly dislike M$ and I loathe Sony. (not to mention Nintendo makes kick-ass games, and their entire back catalog downloadable) Now, it turns out they're fucking up their consoles anyway. The main advantage of consoles has always been hardware continuity... and $400? Rediculous.

    The Revolution might have a little less power, but at least they don't always overpromise and underdeliver. :)

    1. Re:Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rediculous indeed.

    2. Re:Revolution by jinzumkei · · Score: 2, Funny

      Buying a console just on principle? Not into the whole "informed purchase" are you?

    3. Re:Revolution by DarkDigger · · Score: 1

      Why isn't that informed? He's fully informed about the practices of Microsoft and Sony and he wants to support Nintendo as a result. The difference is that his priorities don't lie solely with graphics, and he has an interest in promoting better corporate conduct.

  109. Re:well... and backwards compat.? by burrhead · · Score: 1

    This decision will have to affect backwards compatibility to some extent. I'm assuming you will have to have the HD to play older games now? Some big question marks now...

    --
    no sleepy!
  110. Just off the press... by CrashRoX · · Score: 1

    The Xbox360 title will now be changed to xbox180. The HD-dvd drive will be replaced with an original xbox standard DVD rom. Wireless control will be replaced with an original standard xbox wired controller. 20 gig HD will be removed entirely. Launch date titles will include solitaire, minesweeper and Pac-man. Other retail titles include: demo versions of GTA5, Halo3 and GrandTourismo95, which are scheduled for release by summer of 2006.

    Isn't the whole XBOX360 release starting to sound like the Vista release? Just a flashy (better graphic engine) version of the original Xbox/Windows XP.

  111. Decisions by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    While the hard drive is nothing special (really I could buy a 300 GB HD for real cheap) with the other stuff it comes with: Wireless controller, headset (something i probably don't use, but hey) would probably make it worth it. The ethernet cable kind of gave me a laugh, but I could see how the common masses would say "Hey thats cool". Especially since a decent ethernet cable costs around 10-15$....I make my cables (its fun knowing how to do that) so it costs me around 50 cents to make a good cat 5e cable....twist the ends and have it be a x-over cable :D

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  112. Too early, too soon by duniyadnd · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that this is just the "First generation" of the xbox 360. Later models will feature the HD-DVD, and mayhaps some games will be made on that format, never know. I'm just going to wait till the guy next door buys and I invite myself over.

  113. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know from years of experience arguing with my parents over which computers they should buy (because they refused to let me build one at half the cost..) that they will:

    look at the price of the deluxe package first, and THEN they will see the cheap one and say "I save $100 for skipping out on these parts? Ring me up!"

  114. Accessories by Thomas+DM · · Score: 1

    More details regarding the included accessories with both models and the exact pricing can be found here.

  115. Missed Opportunity by WebGangsta · · Score: 1
    Thought I had it nailed when it was first announced.

    There's no reason for MSFT to sell the complete package for $399 when they could leverage marketing and sell it for $360.

    Even if they wanted to keep $100 difference between the two units, they could have sold the base unit for $249 or $259. *THAT* would also force Sony's hand to bring the PS3 to market at a non-$299 price or risk being undersold from the get-go. Of course, that means that there would be no wiggle room for discounting the X360 when the PS3 is released.

  116. Go w/ the $299 by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    You can just mod it and get a bigger HD than f'n 20 Gb for $100

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  117. Re:You speekeee Engrish? by bitchell · · Score: 1

    Who said anything about me being an English speaker??

  118. Two Points by marcybots · · Score: 1

    1) very few non-hard drive xbox 360s will be produced
    2) the non-hard drive xbox 360s will be discontinued within a year of release.

    the hard driveless xbox 360 is a marketing ploy

  119. No HD no backwards compatability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As they were supposed to use patches downloaded to the hd, without it I cant see how they can get it to work.
      OK this wont bother some people but as the ps2 showed backeards compatability is a great feature to have.

    MS just found another way to get money out of people.

  120. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Savage650 · · Score: 1
    the memory sticks go in the controllers.

    Um, no .. that was the Dreamcast. They called it "VMU" (Visual Memory Unit?). The modules had a tiny CPU, a smallish LCD matrix display and a few buttons. Thus, you could (in Theory) run mini-games on them (Tamagotchi anyone?)

  121. Stupid Stupid Stupid! by Profcrab · · Score: 1

    Gone is one advantage that Microsoft looked like they were going to have over Sony, shipping the Xbox 360 with a hard drive as standard equipment. Now the developers are not going to program the games to use the hard drive. This will bring down the level of features that will be offered in a game. So, what will Xbox have over PS3? Nothing by the looks of it. They will get a small marketing jump by being first out but the PS3 will crush the 360 by virtue of its massive PS2 catalog alone.

    The Xbox came out with a major feature that helped them make some in roads in the market. They offered a hard drive that developers could use to reduce the load times. It was a value to the consumer because it did not increase the price of the system. Consumers, in general, do not purchase peripherals for game systems beyond an extra controller. I think Microsoft is seriously overestimating their foothold in the console market and this decision is going to cost them alot.

  122. XBOX 360 Preorders! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XBox360Preorders.com - sign up and get notified of each new preorder. WalMart.com is taking them beginning tomorrow morning.

  123. Check out the peripheral prices! by Funk_dat69 · · Score: 1

    Ign has some more info:
    http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/642/642647p1.html

    Looks pricey!

    $50 for the wireless controller and then $12 more for the damn battery, and what's the $20 Play and Charge kit?

    Does that mean you could spend up to $82 per controller for all the bells and whistles?? Yikes!

    --
    FUNK!
  124. don't make your pocket cry by llamaxing · · Score: 1

    What it comes down to is whether or not the second deal is worth it to you. Ask yourself what your priorities are. Can you afford it, and if so, do you plan on playing FFXI or even Halo 2 on the 360? Do wires get on your nerves? Do you have broadband or plan on getting it? If you answered "no" to two of those questions, then you're better off with the cheaper version. And besides, it's going to be the same Xbox; they aren't going to change some specs for the guys who bought the more expensive package. In fact, that's all it is -- a package. An Xbox, and peripherals. If you feel you don't need the stuff now but will eventually, just go and buy it.

  125. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  126. Dumb, just dumb. by veganopolis · · Score: 1

    No you cannot have my 300$, and no I will not give you a little less only to upgrade later.

    This is like people buying a sports car just so they can look cool. The car doesn't actually get them anywhere faster, but it sure looks flashy!

    I remember some of the older systems that tried crap like this. They were too expensive and they flopped too.

  127. This is sounding really expensive, really fast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, MS is pushing the premium more than the Core. There will be mostly the premium packages than the core packages.

    Second, if you want to play old XBox games, you have to get the HD. I guess that's why MS said during E3 that the 360 is "mostly" backwards-compatible. If you don't have the HD, you don't play XBox games.

    Third, wireless Internet is an additional $99. So that $400 premium box just became $500.

    Fourth, games are $60.

    I guess Bill nees to build a study room for his kids, and need more money...

    And why does it cost $50 to put a 20GB HD into the xbox? You can get 100GB drives for $50 nowadays!

  128. Official press release on Xbox.com by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Informative
    No need to hear from third parties about this. The official announcement regarding tiered pricing is on the Xbox site. Here's the text:

    Microsoft Announces Xbox 360 Price for Europe and North America: Starts at $299.99 U.S./299.99/£209.99

    Feature-packed system brings high-definition gaming to the masses this holiday season.

    LEIPZIG, Germany -- Aug. 17, 2005 -- Ending weeks of speculation about which upcoming video game platform will give gamers the most bang for their buck, today at the German Games Convention, Microsoft Corp. revealed that consumers can get their hands on Xbox 360(TM) -- the most powerful and feature-packed next-generation video game and entertainment system -- for as little as $299.99 U.S./299.99/£209.99 starting this holiday season. For gamers who want to experience the ultimate digital entertainment thrill ride, Microsoft also announced a model with hundreds of dollars worth of accessories for $399.99 U.S./399.99/£279.99, giving consumers the definitive entertainment experience at an unbelievable value right out of the box.

    The Xbox 360 and Xbox 360 Core System -- along with an impressive lineup of high-definition game titles from the world's best publishers and developers -- will make their debut in North America, Europe and Japan in time for this Christmas holiday, several months ahead of the competition. Although details for the Japan launch will be addressed at the Tokyo Game Show in September, the unprecedented three-region launch signifies an industry first. The Xbox 360 platform will deliver the most powerful console, the best games, the next generation of the Xbox Live® service, and amazing digital entertainment experiences never seen in console entertainment. "The sheer entertainment value of Xbox 360 cannot be overstated," said Robbie Bach, chief Xbox officer for Microsoft. "While the system has the muscle to power awe-inspiring graphics, audio and online play, it's also got the intelligence to serve as a one-of-a-kind entertainment device that plays CDs, DVDs, MP3s and digital content from an array of devices, including portable music players and digital cameras."

    With its built-in Ethernet port and free Silver level of service right out of the box, Xbox 360 also connects players to Xbox Live, the premier global online console games and entertainment network. With Xbox Live, gamers can chat with friends online, build and share gamer profiles, send and receive text and voice messages, and access Xbox Live Marketplace for new content such as game demos, trailers and casual games from Xbox Live Arcade. Subscribers to the Gold level of service will also enjoy access to online multiplayer gaming in their favorite games, as well as great promotional programs such as worldwide tournaments, the chance to play online with their favorite celebrities, and opportunities to win big prizes.

    For gamers who want the ultimate experience (and the best value) right out of the box, Microsoft will offer the $399.99 U.S./399.99/£279.99 Xbox 360 console. This premium edition -- distinguished by signature metallic detailing on the console itself -- comes fully loaded for the ultimate gaming experience, with components and accessories that would cost more than $200 if sold separately:

    • Xbox 360 console. Sexy styling that packs a punch -- three powerful core processors are poised to pump out 720p/1080i output, 16x9 cinematic aspect ratio, anti-aliasing for smooth textures, full surround sound and DVD playback right out of the box.
    • Xbox 360 Hard Drive (20 GB). 20 GB and detachable, the hard drive allows gamers to store their games, music, downloaded trailers, levels, demos and community-created content from Xbox Live Marketplace.
    • Xbox 360 Wireless Controller. Hassle-free high-performance precision wireless gaming features the Xbox® Guide Button for q
    1. Re:Official press release on Xbox.com by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Game over. Microsoft just fucked this generation up. Everything that makes their system appealing over the competition is now an "extra". Everything that they've been hammering into the ground as an advantage is now an optional extra. Everything that got me excited about the system now costs extra.

      No thanks.

    2. Re:Official press release on Xbox.com by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      With the exception of the hard drive, all of the listed peripherals were "extra" on the original Xbox also.

    3. Re:Official press release on Xbox.com by Keeper · · Score: 1

      I could care less what the original xbox came with. A harddrive and wireless controller were supposed to be standard equipment this generation. When they first started showing this stuff, the first words out of my mouth were "it's about fucking time!"

      Instead, "standard" is a machine you can't save games to and have to fiddle around back to plug a controller into. It's a step backwards. And how much do you want to bet that the cable won't reach my couch?

      $300 is the right pricepoint. It just isn't the right equipment. To get the right equipment, I have to lay out an extra $100 and get a bunch of crap I don't want.

      Instead of getting one when it comes out, I'll now be waiting to see what Sony does next. Getting your target audience to take a wait-and-see attitude is NOT a good stratedgy.

    4. Re:Official press release on Xbox.com by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      Instead, "standard" is a machine you can't save games to and have to fiddle around back to plug a controller into.

      You only have to plug a controller once.

      And how much do you want to bet that the cable won't reach my couch?

      The cord is 9 feet long.

      Getting your target audience to take a wait-and-see attitude is NOT a good stratedgy.

      Agreed. Sony can take one of two routes now--price at $400 and say it's the same as the Xbox because the $300 doesn't count. Or Sony can price it at $300 with a hard drive and wireless controller.

    5. Re:Official press release on Xbox.com by Keeper · · Score: 1

      The cord is 9 feet long.

      Which means that after it goes around the legs of my cofee table, it won't reach half of the seats on my couch.

      You only have to plug a controller once.

      Unless you tug on it too hard and yank it out, because the cord is too damn short.

      Agreed. Sony can take one of two routes now--price at $400 and say it's the same as the Xbox because the $300 doesn't count. Or Sony can price it at $300 with a hard drive and wireless controller.

      I honestly don't expect Sony to price their unit at $300. But at the same time, I know that with a base unit price of $400 I'm willing to wait to find out.

  129. Look at these prices! The gouging! MY EYES! ARGH! by larsoncc · · Score: 1

    Have you guys seen this article at GameSpot??

    So, for $99, you can buy the hard drive seperately? Uh... NO. That's a $30 profit, easy, not even buying in bulk!

    The wireless networking adapter is another $99? Uh, looks like I'd be going wired for this version of the XBox.

    $50 for a controller? Are they out of their skulls? Controllers, even near LAUNCH, retail at $35, best! The S controller is $25 for the XBox!

    $20 for a headset that's $5 for the regular XBox? $30 to $40 for cables that should be half that, at best?

    Hell, even the memory card is $40. You've got to be kidding me!

  130. Real price of the XB360 base model is $340 by doctor_no · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People that buy the $300 version of the XB360 will need a memoery card since that version has no HDD and people will need to save games and logon to Xbox Live!.

    Microsoft today announced the pricing of the Xbox 360 Memory Unit (64 MB)to be $40. So in reality people that buy even the base model will need to really spend $340 for the system. Since next-gen games are going to be released at $59.99, at the bare minimum the consumer will need to spend at least $400 to be able to enjoy the system. In reality the XB360 "value pack" only really cost $60 more.

    Being that the Playstation 3 will allow users to use standard memory like SD/Compact Flash/MemoryStick (Sony has learned from their mistakes), I wish MS wouldn't lock consumers into their overpriced memory units.

  131. As long as I can save games on the HD, then fine by Retired+Replicant · · Score: 1

    I just don't want to have to mess around with stupid memory cards. All games on the 360 should be required to support saving games on the HD.

  132. Morrowind Oblivion by AmishMoshr · · Score: 1

    This may be slightly off topic, but I remember reading the Bethesda wasn't going to release Oblivion on the PS3 because of the lack of a harddrive on the standard model. Since this also appears to be the case with the XBOX 360, will this make any difference? Or, will, as people have posted already, will this lead to 'system requirements' on video game boxes?

    1. Re:Morrowind Oblivion by Criterion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm guessing Oblivion (as well as Halo 3) will require a hd. System requirement on console game boxes is not a new thing :).

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  133. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by tgrimley · · Score: 1

    from xbox.com's description of the default controllers:

            * Six analog buttons with 256 levels of sensitivity
            * Two analog pressure-point triggers
            * Two vibration feedback motors
            * One eight-way directional pad
            * Two menu navigation buttons
            * Two expansion slots for memory cards or other accessories (sold separately)
            * One 9.8 foot cable with inline release

  134. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  135. launch titles by mckwant · · Score: 1

    There's a link here:

    http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3142257

    The list may not be accurate, and is certianly yawn inducing, IMHO, but it appears there will be several firstgen nextgen titles available.

    Me? I'll be waiting for the second round of console price cuts, just like always.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  136. Less reliance on patches? by 503 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People have complained about buggy games that were rushed to market only to be patched later. If developers can't count on the presence of a hard drive, which is critical for patches, will they have to spend more time on testing because deploying bug fixes may no longer be possible across all systems?

    As someone who would rather wait for a stable release than deal with patches, this could be a good thing.

  137. Math by conigs · · Score: 1

    Hate to break it to you, but 64MB translates to 512Mb.... 8 bits in 1 byte... But then that's assuming that the spec sheet is using proper multipliers (1024^2, not 1000^2) for the M prefix.

    --
    Slashdot: where repeating an article in a post is "+5 Insightful"
    1. Re:Math by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Hate to break it to you, but the M prefix in Megabyte actually really stands for 1000^2 rather than 1024^2 (or 2^20). Both the SI and the IEC define the Mega as one million bytes. (Wikipedia mentions that in usage, Mega could mean 1,000,000 or 1,024,000 or 1,048,576, but since it can mean anything, "proper multipliers" is hard to define, and the standards say it's 1000^2).

      The 1024^2 unit you are looking for is the mebibyte.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    2. Re:Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is actually irrelevant, since either way 64MB is 512Mb...

    3. Re:Math by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Get off your mebibyte usage. Noone uses it. 1,048,576 is what is meant by 1 MB as reported by your computer OS. As it is defined by American companies (for our purposes the orignators are the only ones that count which are IBM, Apple, Microsoft, and AT&T), SI units don't matter.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  138. Bad Move... by Mark+Gillespie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bad move. Developers will have to code for the lowest common dominator, the XBox basic, as they are interested in selling to the largest market possible. The result of this, is that games are crippled for the lesser system, and not taking advantage of the premium models HDD. The best thing Sony could do, would be to make HDD standard on ALL PS3's from the word go. Developers could then be assured all PS3 have HDD storage, and code their games to take advantage of this. This bad decision, and the decision to go with the inferior DVD-HD format could be the nail in the coffin for XBox360 before it's even born..

  139. who cares by Smobien · · Score: 1

    I'll be getting a PS3 along with the rest of the world.

  140. Availability by DCstewieG · · Score: 1

    I think it will be interesting to see ratios of $299/$399 packages when they end up in retail. I think MS would be wise to make the high-end version make up at least half of those available.

  141. Man, that's a kick in the fanboy's nuts... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    People like this guy have been ranting in slashdot comments for weeks about how there wasn't going to be a no-hard-drive version at launch. After all the rest of os have been flamed, modded down, and accused of being Sony fanboys for rationally suggesting otherwise. Why aren't there any posts rubbing this in?

    Hah! We told you so!

  142. No Hard Drive, No Backwards Compatibility by Skeetskeetskeet · · Score: 1

    New Electronic Gaming Monthly talks to one of the 360 developers, and he stated that you need the removable hard drive to have backwards compatibility with XBox games on the 360. I guess you have to download some special codeset to work in tandem with the 360 in order for the games to work. He also said the 360 would be released with a hard drive, but I guess now there will be two versions out... And the hits just keep on coming!

    --
    Yeah, my karma sucks....but so do the mods.
  143. Not that surprising... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 0

    Shotgun, check. Foot, check.... ...it still remains to be seen if Nintendo's going to blow it as badly as the other two ;)

    --
    "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
  144. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by magicsquid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's good thinking on your part, however the gaming general public has no such memory of any over promises.

    Does this ring a bell? "The PlayStation 2 will be able to render Toy Story quality graphics in real time."

    Can it actually do that? Obviously not. Does the general public remember that quote? No they don't, and they don't care now. Those same people were the ones that were frothing in ecstasy at the thought of that power when Sony made the proclamation. Sony built up the hype and then when they under-delivered the public just didn't care, so why should Sony be concerned about over-hyping their product now?

    --


    "Chances of RHIC-induced Armageddon are exceedingly rare, but... you never know." - MIT Physicist Bob Jaffe
  145. Begging to be modded by Danuvius · · Score: 1
    According to news in the LA Times, Microsoft will release two Xbox 360 packages when the console is launched later this year. The basic package will retail for $299 and will not include a hard disk, nor will it include a wireless controller, instead shipping with a wired pad.

    The second package will retail for $399 and will include a 20 Gb hard disk, wireless controller, wireless headset, Ethernet cable and remote control. No release date has been revealed, but a mid to late November date is expected.
    OR!! Save a hundred bucks which then you can spend to pay for half-to-most of the cost of modding and adding in a 200+ GB hard drive.

    That innovative Microsoft... really... *rolls eyes*
    --
    Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
  146. Please clarify one section of quote. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would the rich be frightened because someone who could afford second class would choose to fly third class? This makes no sense, except for feelgood bashing.

    1. Re:Please clarify one section of quote. by limon.verde · · Score: 1
      The point is that they want to deter the rich from choosing the option meant for the poor. They want the rich "afraid" of traveling third class. That way they can completely separate the markets and charge the rich as much as they want without having passengers downgrade.

      Replace Third Class with Celeron, First and Second with Pentium and passengers with users if it makes the analogy clearer.

  147. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    WTF crack are you smoking? how is MS's backwards compatibilities issues under-delivering? no one even really believed they could do it at all, and when the announced it, they said they could only guarantee the top games to work at launch and others to be added later. they never ruled out the possibility of say 40% working at launch.

    seems you like to jump on the overreaction bandwagon too much. life must be really depressing for you.

  148. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by rasty · · Score: 2, Funny

    What I do like so far is that they have said virtually nothing; they are quietly learning from the other 2. On the other hand, Sony and M$ have over promised

    They named their next system "Revolution" and you say they're not over promising?

  149. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  150. Re:I find it funny by Criterion · · Score: 1

    I find it funny that alot of you people actually think these are standard sized pc hard drives.

    Newsflash: They're not.

    --
    We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  151. 3rd Party Manufacturers Make This a Dumb Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides the issues of higher production costs for the manufacturer (two different packages, different assembly lines, etc.) and higher costs for the retailers (have to stock two different SKUs and hope that you order the proper quantities of each), third-party manufacturers make this a really bad idea. I guarantee that on launch day, someone like Pelican will have all of the additional Xbox accessories on the shelves in a $50 bundle. The result? Very few of the higher priced Xbox packages will sell and retailers will be stuck with product they can't move which occupies valuable real estate in their stores.

  152. Re:You speekeee Engrish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the point in being a grammer and spelling Nazi? Some people can spell ok, some people can't. So?

  153. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me, have you seen the front of the console??? The Memory Slots are RIGHT THERE!!

    Yeah, and for $299 they come EMPTY!

  154. Re: extended game play by Criterion · · Score: 1

    "Given that the price per gigabyte these days is down to around $0.48USD for the largest models, I wouldn't want to pay more than $10 for a 20GB hard drive."

    You've obviously not priced small form factor drives lately... or ever.

    --
    We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  155. Actually, the best analogy is by jbellis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "just like the PS2 HDD"

    nobody developed for it because nobody had it, and nobody bought it because nobody developped for it.

    it's possible that 360+HDD will be worth developing for if MS can get enough people to buy it early enough... good luck.

    1. Re:Actually, the best analogy is by Ryan+Monster · · Score: 1

      I seriously don't see a problem with devs enabling certain added features if a HDD is detected. I'm not sure this concern is really a valid one. In fact, if it's promoted right, it might drive sales of the beefier Xbox360's to play the game with all the yummy features.

      --
      Change your name to Homer Junior! Your friends can call you Hoju
  156. Was Xbox, not PS2 by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 5, Informative
    Does this ring a bell? "The PlayStation 2 will be able to render Toy Story quality graphics in real time."

    Yeah that rings a bell. But not from history.

    The quote you are thinking of referred to the Xbox launch, not the Playstation 2 launch. Billy G himself said it:

    Gates said the 3-D chips in the Xbox would be three times faster than anything on the market and offer nearly unlimited graphical visuals. "We're approaching the level of detail seen in Toy Story 2," he said, referring to the computer-generated kids film from Disney/Pixar.

    The original Wired article.

    Somehow people keep repeating this quote as a Sony quote. I don't know why. I don't blame you - its very common.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Was Xbox, not PS2 by magicsquid · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. I'm not sure where I picked that up as a Sony quote, but I haven't been able to find it now that I'm searching for it. Nice catch. I'd mod you up if I could.

      --


      "Chances of RHIC-induced Armageddon are exceedingly rare, but... you never know." - MIT Physicist Bob Jaffe
    2. Re:Was Xbox, not PS2 by ad0gg · · Score: 4, Informative
      " The new microprocessor will allow users to handle nearly 50 times more 3-D image data compared with Sega Enterprises Ltd.'s (7964) Dreamcast game console. It will also let users produce game characters comparable in image quality to Walt Disney's Toy Story. "
      Link

      Sony was claiming Toy Story quality graphics with psx2 before it launched. Hence the phrase.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    3. Re:Was Xbox, not PS2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't know ive played tekken 5 and it looks better than toy story .. I think you should watch the movie and see how simple it really was.. also they said comparable .. which i think is fair .. it was still ahead of the pc at the time.

    4. Re:Was Xbox, not PS2 by RipTides9x · · Score: 1

      Actually, the original quote was about "Toy Story", and like everything else Mr. Gates does, he appropriated the original quote added the 2 on it to innovate. The actual prize goes to the CEO of Nvidia himself, Jen-Hsun Huang, who said it before the release of Geforce3 line of cards around 2001. Since then its been re-quoted and mis-quoted time and time again to the point it's impossible to find a good reference on google.

      I can see where Billy G would use it since he did partner with Nvidia on the first Xbox. But over at Beyond 3D we've been asking "Are we there yet?(re: Toy Story Graphics)" with each new generation of Nvidia graphics chips for quite a number of years now.

      Somehow people keep repeating this quote as a Bill Gates quote. I don't know why. I don't blame you - its very common.

    5. Re:Was Xbox, not PS2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nihon Keizai Shimbun is not Sony

    6. Re:Was Xbox, not PS2 by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Sony was claiming Toy Story quality graphics with psx2 before it launched. Hence the phrase.

      You neglected to quote the beginning of that excerpt:

      The Nihon Keizai Shimbun reported early Monday morning that the new PlayStation which confirms many of the most recent fervent rumors and all of our sources will produce movie-like cinematics comparable to the image quality seen in Pixar's Toy Story, and that it integrates the use of music, movie, and game media on one console.

      The "Nihon Keizai Shimbun" is not Sony. Find me a Sony quote.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  157. Re:f1rst p0st!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you kidding me?

  158. I don't see this as a huge problem by drjenk · · Score: 1

    More than likely, there is some alternative storage included by default to allow for saved games, like a large flash device. This would be something every developer can code for and assume is there for game saves (and for backward compatibility with certain "popular" games). If you want to rip music, download extra content, etc, you'll have to buy the HD. Simple to me. The only downside I see, is that no game would now include the ability to play ripped music, because they can't assume you have the HD. But the 360 may be getting around this by being able to autonimously play music apart from the games? Would require some sort of mixer setting to be able to adjust comparitive volumes...we shall see.

    1. Re:I don't see this as a huge problem by Brantano · · Score: 1

      I had to sign up to get in on this thread. Adding a hard drive to a console launch wouldnt be that expensive. They wouldnt need large drives, add a 2-10gig HD (very cheap) to the launch consoles then release bigger hard drives later on. This way, all games can be encoded with HD saves and content in mind, and whoever needs a bigger HD will upgrade.

  159. Why not make the amount of RAM optional too? by Jagasian · · Score: 1

    Why not make the optical drive optional? Why not make the amount of RAM optional too? Same with the CPU speed. Wait a second, that sounds allot like a PC. Microsoft made a big mistake on this one. They should have stuck with a fixed platform. Users and developers would appreciate it in the long run.

  160. Modded when? by sinner6 · · Score: 1

    Anyone care to guess how long until modchips for XBox 360 hit the streets? I say 6 months.

  161. Re:You speekeee Engrish? by wilbz · · Score: 1

    What's the point in being a grammar and spelling Nazi?

    Poor grammar or spelling makes you look less intelligent, thereby reducing the perceived validity of your point.

  162. Re:I find it funny by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

    Newsflash laptop 20gig drives aren't $99 either. And these aren't pccard sized drives.

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  163. Call me crazy but I see by REALLYTANGY · · Score: 1

    This is a great marketing decision, think about it... 1. If they continue to hammer that you "need to have a hard drive", for music, videos, Tivo like functions and D/L content, those are legitimate reasons. Not to mention that the HD is portable and massive so in the long how much are you going to save in memory cards?!?! 2. You keep the price sweet and inviting, lets get real, casual gamers (as will parents) will look down on nearly $5-6 hundred with a few games. On the other hand how many PS2's/Xbox's sold for that same exact price 4-5 years ago?! I have an inclination that some thing along the following is going to happen.... 1. In time for the PS3 release, MSFT is going to make sure that the "bundle package" in all it's glory sells for less then the PS3.... and/or 2. In time for the PS3 release, MSFT will be prepared to ship the 2nd generation consoles...AKA the 360 along the lines of built in WiFi, HDDVD drive, larger HD...

  164. "Approaching" isn't the same thing as "equals" by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The quote you give simply doesn't state that the Xbox will be able to do Toy Story graphics.

    (And the reason people keep pushing it as a Sony quote is because when the PS2 was announced you kept getting different people suggesting that it could do that. There's no official quotes because Sony wisely didn't make them, but it isn't a secret that they obviously fed that kind of comparison to the media somehow. There's no way all sorts of places would start making that comparison just out of the blue.)

    --
    There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    1. Re:"Approaching" isn't the same thing as "equals" by RealmRPGer · · Score: 1

      No way? How about because Toy Story was the first (and back then, only, unless I'm mistaken) widespread, popular, and acclaimed 3D Generated movie. I mean, WHAT ELSE was there to compare it to? Nothing! And that's why people compared it to that.

    2. Re:"Approaching" isn't the same thing as "equals" by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      And the reason people keep pushing it as a Sony quote is because when the PS2 was announced you kept getting different people suggesting that it could do that. There's no official quotes because Sony wisely didn't make them, but it isn't a secret that they obviously fed that kind of comparison to the media somehow. There's no way all sorts of places would start making that comparison just out of the blue.

      No, of course not. There's certainly no such thing as unsubstantiated rumour floating around the internet.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  165. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll get Nintendo Revolution (yep, I'm a fanboy). What I do like so far is that they have said virtually nothing; they are quietly learning from the other 2. On the other hand, Sony and M$ have over promised, built expectations and are figuring ways to under-deliver (such as M$'s backward compatabilies issues)

    So far for me it's a tossup between Nintendo Revolution - because they have more of the games that I tend to like and aren't so FPS-oriented - and the PS3 - which seems like a better system than the xBox.

    Note: I currently own a GameCube and an xBox - but only own two titles for the xBox.

    Pretty much for me - if it plays The Sims and it's variants, plus some cool Japanes and Euro games - you got me. Or if they come out with GTA: Seattle then I'll buy a platform that plays that.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  166. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody on slashdot believed perhaps, but Microsoft DID say they would be backwards compatible and have back tracked on that statement several times already.

  167. Re:Halo or Nija Gaiden by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I own it for the games. (Splinter Cell and Ninja Gaiden especially.)

    How is Ninja Gaiden? I'm not that interested in Splinter Cell - too much time in the military myself to be interested in it - but I thought I heard Ninja Gaiden was interesting - why? Also, do you know if it's being ported to or will play on the xBox 360?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  168. Xbox 360 Doomed? by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    Well maybe doomed is too strong, but they really haven't made their lives easier with 2 models at launch. As far as developers are concerned, the hard drive might as well not exist. As others have noted and as has been the case in console history, most developers will not develop for hardware that is not standard on the system. The lack of a hard drive standard on all systems puts them back on level with the PS3. That coupled with questionable backwards compatibility, means that Xbox 360 is a new system going head to head with the PS3. The probability of success drops considerably when looked at that way. How can the 360 out-PS3 the PS3?

    Microsoft knows all of this already, so what must their game plan be? Assuming that despite all of the hype, that the 360 and the PS3 are equally powerful, then how does MS win? Microsoft's greatest strength has been being able to provide developers with the tools they need to make the best of Microsoft platforms. If MS can make the 360 drop dead easy to exploit, then it can do well despite the lack of a standard hard drive. Ease of development was one of the things that propelled the original Playstation to dominance.

    In the end, I think that dropping the standard hd signals a true break with the 1st gen Xbox. MS learned some tough lessons, and now I think they're wiping the board clean and starting over. That may have been the plan from the start. This sounds a bit like the typical Microsoft bets the whole company sort of strategy. Which is not too far from the truth entering a post PC period when MS cannot depend upon shipping more and more copies of Office and Windows. It's funny that Sony's life also depends more and more on a games console as well.

  169. xBox crashing by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I own an XBox, but not either of the Halos.

    It has never crashed.


    My xBox has crashed quite a few times when playing Fable. Very disconcerting.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:xBox crashing by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 1

      Then perhaps it's a problem with the game itself, and not the system? I know that Fable and especially Knights of the Old Republic are not the most stable games out there.

      --
      I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
    2. Re:xBox crashing by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      that's like saying that the Shuttle is totally working, even when it crashes due to wing design or o-ring design.

      sure, the shuttle works, but if it still crashes, blaming it on something else just points out how flaky it is.

      same goes for the xBox.

      now, mind you, you can get the GameCube to flake out too ...

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:xBox crashing by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 1

      That analogy isn't very accurate. ANY computer is capable of crashing assuming that the software is faulty.

      --
      I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
  170. Marketing for the future by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Theory: they are puting out the X360 with a 20 gig HD now, so that they come out with the rumoured 'better' HD down the line, they can ship it with increased capacity and tout the higher capacity as a further improvement.

  171. Bad idea. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1
    If they start to make games that require this, their sales will take a hit, the userbase will get pissed and move elsewhere.

    Pretty much every 360 game has to run with no HD limitation unless it is a subscription service that changes constantly.

    I doubt Bethesda, or especially Bungi would alienate their players. I would imagine the non-HD version will be the biggest seller, and not being able to play Halo 3? Wow, that would go down as being a worse product than the Virtual Boy.

  172. Oozing sarcasm by Scrameustache · · Score: 0

    I do think it's a mistake to sell the 360 without a HD. How is little Johnny going to save his game?

    OMFG!!! I have no fucking clue! He can't! He -just- can't save!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  173. Bait & switch by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    This will let retailers advertise the lower price, which is just at the upper end of what parents are likely to be willing to pay for a game system, and then convince them in the store that they really need the more expensive model: "Do you really want to be tripping over those wires all the time? Or your kid gets excited and yanks the unit off the shelf, and it's an expensive repair (by the way, did I tell you about our extended warranty?) And the kids will need the hard drive and the headset for some of the best games, anyway. You'll end up spending a lot more buying all this stuff as accessories down the road, so why not buy the deluxe package and save money?"

  174. Sony LOVES to sell peripherals. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Playstation 3 will allow users to use standard memory like SD/Compact Flash/MemoryStick (Sony has learned from their mistakes)

    I doupt that very much.
    They LOVE to sell peripherals, and there's plenty of time yet to change their minds and require an official memory card.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Sony LOVES to sell peripherals. by doctor_no · · Score: 1

      Playstation 3 will allow users to use standard memory like SD/Compact Flash/MemoryStick (Sony has learned from their mistakes)

      I doupt that very much.
      They LOVE to sell peripherals, and there's plenty of time yet to change their minds and require an official memory card.


      It's already been announced that Sony will come with standard memory slots:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3
      # Memory Stick standard/Duo and standard/mini slots
      # CompactFlash Type I and II slot
      # SD slot

      http://hardware.gamespot.com/Story-ST-x-1985-x-x-x


      The PlayStation 3 comes with an array of data storage and transfer features. Whereas the PlayStation 2 only supported a memory card and the optional hard drive attachment (for a brief time), the PlayStation 3 supports numerous forms of portable media. The PlayStation 3 has 6 USB 2.0 ports, a memory stick slot, an SD slot, and, in stark contrast to many of Sony's other consumer electronics products, the system actually supports compact flash. Sony even saved a space for a removable 2.5" hard drive.

      Ethernet (RJ45), 6 USB 2.0, CF Slot (Type I, II), SD Slot (Regular, Compact), Memory Stick, Memory Stick Duo, 1 x Optical Audio

    2. Re:Sony LOVES to sell peripherals. by radish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure it will have the slots. But where does it say that's what will be used for saving games? I can easily see that CF etc are only supported for displaying camera images or something like that.

      As has been mentioned, Sony are the kings of add-ons ; they won't miss this opportunity.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Sony LOVES to sell peripherals. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1
      They LOVE to sell peripherals, and there's plenty of time yet to change their minds and require an official memory card.
      It's already been announced that Sony will come with standard memory slots:

      Did you even read what I wrote?
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  175. Re:Halo or Nija Gaiden by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

    I know I'm not the original poster you were asking, but I just wanted to say that Ninja Gaiden is amazing. For my money it's the best 3D action game ever made. The difficulty level is set fairly high (though a lot of people exaggerate it), but the game is thankfully completely fair about it (unlike vaguely similar games like the DMC series). It's easily one of my favorite games of this console generation, and I recommend that absolutely nobody miss it. Assuming you have decent taste in games you'll have a blast with Ninja Gaiden.

    There isn't any information whether it will play on the Xbox360 yet. It should eventually, but we don't know if the backwards compatibility will be far enough alone at launch. But there is a newly upgraded version coming in September, so I would wait for that anyway. It's called Ninja Gaiden Black, and here's a webpage with an awesome trailer for it (specifically grab the HD debut trailer). Not only does it have a lot more content, but the graphics have been improved and it will be more accessible since they added an easier difficulty level for those that couldn't handle the original.

    --
    There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
  176. I've never seen more stupidity by Negativeions101 · · Score: 0

    What the hell is wrong with people? Seriously... Doesn't anyone remember that the original playstation and the Saturn debuted at $499!? Actually, Sega changed the pricing at the last minute to $399 for saturn. My god... the PS2 was more than 299 at launch. I'd be pissed if the 360 or PS3 sold for $299 USD at launch. They could skimp out on quality and have your system stop working properly if you play too many movies on it like the PS2. Get real people.

    --

    I'm not anti-microsoft. I'm anti-bullshit. Which means I'm anti-microsoft.
  177. UK pricing is once again highest by bhunachchicken · · Score: 1

    Accord to this article on Gamesindustry.biz gamers in the UK will be expected to fork out,

    £299 for the "Core System"
    and £399 for the full system.

    If this is right then it means the full system in the UK is a whopping $720!

    Why is it that when they decide to bring the goods over here they just replace the $ with a £?

    1. Re:UK pricing is once again highest by TyrionEagle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but according to this story at SPOnG the straight conversion was Dollars to Euros and the UK will be paying £209.99 and £279.99.

      This is also confirmed by trade magazine MCV.

      And actually, that's what the GI.b story says too.

      --
      -- I like the cut of your thinking, young man. - me.
  178. Deals, deals, deals! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    So, for an extra $100, I get the exact same controller except with no wire, and the smallest hard drive still in production? Where do I sign up?

    Seems like you'd have to be an idiot to buy the more expensive version, unless it's impossible to install a normal hard drive, which seems unlikely since custom hard drives would quite likely double the production costs. How much are wireless controllers going for these days? $40?

    Then again, never underestimate the buying power of idiots...

  179. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

    This is what you said
    ----------------

    haven't heard of memory sticks for the xbox?

    Tell me, have you seen the front of the console??? The Memory Slots are RIGHT THERE!!

  180. Nintendo blow it? by rinks · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Remains to be seen? Profits down 80 percent this year, marquee title (Zelda) pushed back to 06, absolutely no info on the revolution (except some convolted new controller and the ability to buy nostaligia and download it), failure to cater to any audience above 13, and it remains to be seen? What, exactly, remains to be seen?

    --
    My good looks paid for that pool, and my talent filled it with water.
    1. Re:Nintendo blow it? by ottothecow · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nintendo just needs to contract with Rockstar Games and get new versions of GTA with sex that doesnt require anything special to get at. Follow that with some more mature (but tastefull) themed games and you will have the 13-18 audience...who knows what it would take to get past that.

      --
      Bottles.
    2. Re:Nintendo blow it? by koi88 · · Score: 1


      {about Nintendo}: failure to cater to any audience above 13

      I'm 31 and I love my Gamecube.
      And I don't think sex minigames attract a really "mature audience". For sex, I have a girlfriend.

      --

      I don't need a signature.
    3. Re:Nintendo blow it? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      For sex, I have a girlfriend.

      Whoa whoa, watch what you're saying! You're on Slashdot!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:Nintendo blow it? by rinks · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because that was my point, that games for post-teens must have sex in them to be "mature". You know, like Halo or God of War or Burnout 3. And unlike games that require me to talk, shake, or blow on my controller.

      --
      My good looks paid for that pool, and my talent filled it with water.
    5. Re:Nintendo blow it? by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      Exactly, the sex and violence games aren't "mature" really....their pretty juvenile... I'd say an RPG with a deep and meaningful storyline would be alot more mature than GTA

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    6. Re:Nintendo blow it? by mink · · Score: 1

      God of War has sex, so were you listing other games with sex? I'd like to find the hot Burnout 3 action as well as see how much Master Chief has to offer in that department. I hope it is not all him getting it on with Covenent (I have Halo for the PC).

      I'm not saying it's a good thing, but Nintendo is still making a profit. Unless they start operating at a loss for years in a row we dont have anything to worry about.

      As for age and games, blah. I'm 32 and plenty on the PS2 and Gamecube are fun for me (I do not own an Xbox so I can not really comment).

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  181. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

    Except for the fact that the delux package is actually the standard package and the standard package is actually a stripped down version of the regular 360.

    Microsoft told us about the 360 and all the cool features and stuff.

    Then they told us it would cost $300.

    Then they tell us they'll be releasing updated versions over the years so we'll have to re-buy if we want those new features (even though games probably won't support them).

    Then they tell us the 360 is really going to cost $400 for what we thought we were getting for $300, but we can get a stripped down version for $300.

    Except they're turning it all around to make it look like you're actually getting extra features for that $400 when you're not. You're getting the standard console as it was meant to be.

    I'm sure the bad news is just going to keep rolling in.

    What about the fact that developing for all these differences is going to cost money and in turn raise the prices of games??

    People have been saying that $60/game was probably for the high end games or that the price would eventually drop.

    I don't think so(meaning this is my opinion). I think $60 will be the standard price of games with $80 being the high end and the only games costing less than $60 will be the smaller games or games with less budget. (games that didn't sell well, etc etc)

    People who don't have $400 up front for a new console plus money for games and maybe an extra controller or two are going to be screwed in the long run if we actually want those features that are in the "delux" package. It's going to cost a lot more than $100 to upgrade it later on.

    Also don't forget that if you buy the cheaper version you still have to buy memory carts if you want to save games.

    Sigh. This is retarded. I was hoping to get either a PS3 or XBox 360 along with a Revolution (which I'm getting for sure) but now it looks like they're both going to be too expensive for what I want.

    So people who want a working PS3 for a decent price are going to have to wait another 3 years and people who want a 360 with all the standard features and a decent price are going to have to do the exact same thing.

    That sucks.

  182. Re:Look at these prices! The gouging! MY EYES! ARG by radish · · Score: 1

    I think you're missing the fact that the controllers and headsets (at the prices you quote) are wireless. The logitech wireless headset for the current xbox is $70. The logitech wireless controller's are around $40 (and I'm sure MSRP is over $50). The wireless adapter is expensive, sure, but you couls always just get a generic bridge for $50 or so.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  183. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by kruelio · · Score: 1

    Wrong. Xbox 360 Core *will* include an ethernet cable:

    http://www.majornelson.com/2005/08/17/xbox-360-det ails-and-prices

  184. Ohhh the possibilities..... by Malafax · · Score: 1

    You see, the only good thing that comes from my friends being in Korea is they charge the least for things that are fulled MOD'D... "GOD" I love technology, and better yet, I love those that are better at it then me =0)

    --
    While everyone must die, the sad true is that many never actually live.
  185. PS3... by cornface · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm not sure how accurate this is, but saw the link in a fark.com thread.

    Amazon PS3 page.

    Note the price: $299. If that's the case MS really is doomed.

  186. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by ElJefe · · Score: 1

    I hope you're right about Nintendo learning from the other two. I think the biggest thing that they can do to get developers on their side is to give the Revolution a single, powerful processor. Everything I've heard indicates that the Xbox 360 and PS3 are a pain the ass to develop for, since nobody in the gaming industry knows how to write parallel code.

    If Nintendo can jump into this now and promise a console that's easier to develop for and debug on, they'll have a big advantage. However, if they wait two more years, the programming tools and abilities will catch up and they'll lose any advatage they could have had.

  187. Classic Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is likely, that MS will simply ship miniscule amount of $299 model and all the parents with screaming children will be forced to pony up an extra one hundred dollar to avoid a Christmas disaster. Meanwhile, MS can cheerfully hype the fact their product cost less than the competitors.

  188. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by empvirus · · Score: 1

    One big difference with your laptop is that it doesn't need to hook up to a TV, and is completely mobile. That, and I bet you could find a much better than just 20 gigs for 70 bucks.

    --
    Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
  189. This is for piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    xbox360 with nic will require xbox live at startup to try to foil piracy. xbox without won't.

    This would be pretty stupid but i wouldn't put it past ms.

    I'm sure they are really pissed that xbmc can basically remove the need for a media center pc for 129$ or whatever xbox's sell for now.

  190. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by Hellsbells · · Score: 1

    I bought a new 20GB laptop Hard-drive for $AU 45 about a year ago. That's about $US 35.

  191. GameCube / Revolution anyone? by Rocky1138 · · Score: 1

    Sheesh.. The Nintendo lifestyle is looking more attractive by the minute. Aren't they the only ones making games any more? I was the hugest Xbox fan for the first year, then they turned their backs on gamers and went for the money: movie licence games and ports from the PS2. Xbox Live beta was a blast and then 12-year-olds invaded. I gave up and bought a GameCube two years after the Xbox and I've had just about as much fun on that. Right now it's been collecting a lot of dust, though. I just don't have the time to enjoy console games like I used to. I find that if it's not on a PC and I can convince myself that I'm in a working environment to satisfy my guilt of playing when I should be working, it's impossible to get up and go over to the TV and sit down to just play games. :/ Maybe I should see someone about that.

    1. Re:GameCube / Revolution anyone? by TheInternet · · Score: 1

      The Nintendo lifestyle is looking more attractive by the minute. Aren't they the only ones making games any more

      Yep, you're certainly not the only one who feels this way.

          - Scott

      --
      Scott Stevenson
      Tree House Ideas
    2. Re:GameCube / Revolution anyone? by Xabrophazon · · Score: 1

      I bought every single sytem since the SNES launch day (except for the PSP... I don't really see much use for it) and in all honesty, I haven't touched my PS2 in at least 8 months, I only use my Xbox occasionally for Live, but I'm always playing my DS or SP, and my Gamecube get played at least three times a week. I may be a weirdo, but I don't think power equals good games. Of course, one needs a decently powered system to be able to draw graphics, but I don't need my gaming system competing with NASA for the most powerful supercomputer title.

      --
      --- kthxbai
  192. UK pricing is once again highest by Neuticle · · Score: 1

    Because they are holding a 229 year grudge?
    Becasue they are idiots?

    I feel for you, I've always been flabergasted by that $ -> £ conversion. It's not like the pound and dollar are even near equivalent, it's closer to 2:1. It's not like they tried to go from ¥ -> $ (ouch!).

    Does the UK have some sort of video game tax (A VGT to go with your VAT and your Tax-for-the-hell-of-it-tax?

    --
    "Cheeze it!" - Bender
  193. $100 extra for 20 GB? Sounds like the iPod... by jZnat · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but $100 extra for a 20 GB harddrive? I can get one of those for half the price, let alone getting a 160 GB HDD for less than $100 still!

    The Xbox360 better allow "3rd party harddrives", or Microsoft is fucking themselves over. I personally liked ripping music to my Xbox to listen to in sports games, GTA:SA, etc.

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  194. Re:I find it funny by jZnat · · Score: 1

    Laptop drives are usually 2.5". My laptop here sports an 80 GB HDD, and as far as I've seen, the highest capacity on the market in 2.5" drives is usually around 100 GB or 120 GB (possibly). The problem with laptop HDDs is that they have to use significantly less power to be able to extend battery life to the fullest, and for that, they must sacrifice speed and capacity (large capacity => longer read-times and such).

    Now, something like the Xbox 360; I'm sure it can theoretically use a standard 3.5" 133 UltraIDE or SATA/150 drive with no problems, but MS apparently thinks that using the lowest capacity HDD is best. *sigh*

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  195. what is this suxbox bs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey fuck you all what the hell are you doing making fuzz over nothing? isn't it established here already many times that ms will not get support here? so then wtf are you doing yapping away about any ms shit?

  196. 2.5" HDD for $40? by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    Where can you get a (new) 2.5" hard disk for $40, of any capacity? Least I can find is more like $60, and doesn't include an enclosure. You forgot the IR remote and fancier component cable too.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  197. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I see your comic I picture you ripping your ass apart for the camera, I bet my imagination is more acurate then yours.

  198. wired by fixmyship · · Score: 1

    Where do you connect the wired controllers? I can't find any ports for it unless you could use the memory ports.

    1. Re:wired by TyrionEagle · · Score: 1

      I believe they go in the USB ports on the back. So does the wireless network adapter.

      --
      -- I like the cut of your thinking, young man. - me.
  199. Brilliant logic... not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there have been times when I 'rewarded' the 'brave' people (who just stuck to ordering what they initially wanted) with an occasional free upgrade to a medium soda, for the same price.

    So for the people who are adamant about getting exactly what they ordered, you "reward" them by giving them something different from what they ordered? Brilliant logic, there.

    Here's a tip: some people order the small drink because they feel forced to finish all of their food. By giving them a "free" medium drink, you've just forced them to eat more than they wanted.

  200. Re:no way i'm paying another $100 to mister gates by phxbadash · · Score: 1

    good luck hooking that $20 20gb hd up to the xbox360. First, it uses a 2.5 or 1.8 inch hd (ie laptop harddrive) and second we don't even know what connection they are going to use to hook it up in the first place, so there is no saying if you will even be able to hook a standard hd up anyways.

  201. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  202. Footshooting Themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has chosen poorly in this decision. People want standardized consoles with only superficial customization. They want not optional internal components.

  203. Original XBOX spec by *weasel · · Score: 1

    You do realize XBOX1 games had to function perfectly when the HD was full, right?

    That simply because they knew the HD would always be there, didn't mean they always knew it was [i]available[/i]?

    Why do you think so few XBOX1 games used the HD to much affect?

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:Original XBOX spec by *weasel · · Score: 1

      fscking ubb...

      get out of my brain!

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
  204. I hate bad press releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SKUs are used by RETAILERS, not manufacturers. The xbox360 will ship in two EANs (call them GITNs if you want), not SKUs. STORES will assign them two SKUs. I hate people incorrectly using technical terms to try to sound important.

  205. One thing I never understood by Reapman · · Score: 1

    Is why they can't have the hard drive "look" like a memory card to the games. For example, with the PS2 hard drive: games, if not explicitly programmed for it, would act like the hard drive wasn't there. Why they can't in these next gen systems make the games think that the hard drive is in fact a memory card, with just a little bit (ok a lot) more room? I know the technologies between mem cards and hard drives are totally different, but can't they fake the games into thinking it's a card? This way at the very least you would'nt have to worry about swapping memory cards between games, since it would have an internal massive memory card? Probably not explaining myself well bleh..

  206. Not only that by Glith · · Score: 1

    Sony's already announced that the PS3 will have an add-on HD as well.

    Of course, slashdot erupted into applause. "It's so much more flexible" they said.

  207. Noooooooo by OK+PC · · Score: 1

    Someone had to make this: http://x360no.ytmnd.com/

    --
    Did you get that thing I sent ya?
  208. Sector remapping by tepples · · Score: 1

    in most cases, the drive capacity is rounded down to the next marketable number, and the firmware denies the existence of the extra space.

    That's called "error correction". Most drives reserve several tracks for remapping sectors that have become unreliable. Rounding down to the next marketable number lets the manufacturer use more tracks for sector remapping and better error correction on each track to boost MTBF.

  209. Broadband penetration? by tepples · · Score: 1

    the same way nowadays you can play Live if you have broadband.

    So how do I get broadband if my parents live in Anal Sex, Nowhere? If one console offers both dial-up and broadband multiplayer and another console offers only dial-up multiplayer, then the console or games that require broadband will not sell nearly as well in those areas that do not have affordable residential broadband. Examples include places where the monopoly cable company imposes a 3 GB/mo cap, or places where the monopoly telco offers nothing between ISDN and a T1. Specifically, the United States is lagging significantly in broadband penetration. As for the higher network latency of dial-up players screwing up response time of broadband players, not all video game genres are as sensitive to ping times as shooters.

  210. Exercise pad is making a comeback by tepples · · Score: 1

    About the light gun, exercise pad, and ROB... Exactly how many games ever got made to make use of those? Very few. Very very few.

    Granted about the exercise pad and ROB on the NES, but light guns do not work on non-CRT TVs or TVs that run in progressive mode (such as any TV that doubles as an HDTV monitor). Still, the modern exercise pad has a lot going for it: DDR USA, DDR Disney Mix, and DDR Konamix for PS1; DDRMAX, DDRMAX2, DDR Extreme, In The Groove, and DDR Extreme 2 (forthcoming) for PS2; DDR Ultramix, DDR Ultramix 2, and DDR Ultramix 3 (forthcoming) for Xbox; and MC Groovz Dance Craze and DDR Mario Mix (forthcoming) for GameCube. It's too bad that Frequency for PS2 was programmed to recognize only Dual Shock 2 controllers.

  211. Re:Dumbest "Package" Ever by tepples · · Score: 1

    from xbox.com's description of the default controllers: ... Six analog buttons ... Two analog pressure-point triggers ... Two expansion slots for memory cards or other accessories (sold separately)

    This is description for the xb180, not the xb360. The xb360 controllers have four buttons and four triggers like the PlayStation controllers.

  212. Re:I've solved which of the next gen systems to bu by Elranzer · · Score: 1

    The Revolution is, in fact, using the same processor, but a faster one, as the Gamecube: The IBM PowerPC. So developers who have coded for the Gamecube can easily jump into the Revolution.

    The Xbox 360 and PS3 all are changing processors. Xbox was Intel P3 (x86) and Xbox 360 is triple-PowerPC. PS2 was MIPS and the PS3 is IBM Cell.

    So 360 and PS3 developers need to learn something new. Revolution developers will be using the same processors (just faster) but will need to learn to code for that controller, which is probably only going to be as hard as learning how to code for the analog stick or rumble pak like in the past.

    I don't know why people think the Revolution is going to be some underpowered system. The PS3 and Xbox 360 have multi-processors (both based on PowerPC) sure. But I'm a computer guy and even I know that if the Revolution is going to have a single 3.0Ghz+ PowerPC processor and a modern ATI GPU, thst's still more than overkill for a console dedicated for running games. Perhaps it's because the 360 and PS3 will be running media center operating systems underneathe, but Nintendo keeps stating they're building nothing but a games system.

  213. Re:Halo or Nija Gaiden by Gulthek · · Score: 1

    Yes yes, I am all about the Ninja Gaiden Black. Especially since I don't have Live so I missed the two expansion packs.