Slashdot Mirror


Worst Buy

Cutriss writes "Steve Lynch of Hypothermia has been running a consumer awareness page following of an Internet pricing disagreement between Best Buy and over 2000 angry customers, where Best Buy refused to honor a web-only sale price of a GeForce4 Ti 4600 for $129.99, at a "Special pre-order price". The situation has escalated further - Rod Hill, Store Manager for Best Buy #513 in Tucker/Dekalb County, GA, had a customer arrested on Friday of last week, citing Fraud and Criminal Trespassing. Hill informed police that Abraham Cherian, an Indian American, was trying to rip off the store, the same store that had conceded to give another customer his video card as requested 10 days earlier. Best Buy is now apparently red-flagging inquiring troublemak^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcustomers who attempt to obtain their purchased cards from Best Buy locations." FWIW, if the description of what happened is accurate, Best Buy has entered into a binding contract to sell the cards at the advertised price, and if they don't want to honor it, the people affected should take them to court (or contact their local Attorney General's office, which is what they appear to be doing). It's Best Buy's obligation to make sure their prices are accurate.

881 comments

  1. Kodak and others by 56ker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You'd think after the Kodak fiasco & another online vendor got the price of an X-Box wrong - and in both cases the customer got it (eventually) at the advertised price they'd just cave in and avoid the bad publicity!

    1. Re:Kodak and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I Remember reading about this in 'Maximum PC' a month or two ago; Best Buy's stand then was that it was an error/typo and not a legally binding contract -- they said that they would not honor the price... seems that some of the stores have been honoring the price, unbeknownst to corporate management...

    2. Re:Kodak and others by phyxeld · · Score: 1

      *sigh*
      Some companies just can't seem to understand that pissing off large groups of consumers is a really bad idea.
      It's really not that difficult a concept when you think about it...
      Here's a tip guys: Having customers publicly arrested is a bad idea.

      --
      __
      Choose mnemonic identifiers. If you can't remember what mnemonic means, you've got a problem. - Larry Wall
    3. Re:Kodak and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Northlake Ga (Store #513)
      4145 Lavista Rd northlake Square
      Tucker, GA 30084
      Phone: 770-939-7660

      Call and ask for Rod Hill service is so good their you can talk to him personally. He started getting bitchy with me and after a long and informational conversation. I mentioned to him that it was legal to record phone conversations in my state as long as one party knew the recording was going on and I was fully aware the whole time that it was being recorded. Expect mp3's soon

    4. Re:Kodak and others by dorsey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A friend of mine came across a typo on the BestBuy website once. They were listing 5-port ethernet switches for $0.01. He ordered 10 of them, as did a coworker of his. Neither actually expected to get the switches, but a week later, my friend got his switches, and his credit card was only charged a dime!

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    5. Re:Kodak and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Here's a tip guys: Having customers publicly arrested is a bad idea.

      Especially when their store magically blows up next week.

    6. Re:Kodak and others by EvilAlien · · Score: 1

      This happened to me with a 19" monitor and an online retailer (I can't remember their URL or even name... it was back when 19" monitors were about $500-600, and I picked it up for just under $400). They'd made an error in the pricing for the monitor, which involved approximately $150-200 in savings. The were gracious enough to simply complete their end of the order for myself and others who had ordered. I still regret only ordering one.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    7. Re:Kodak and others by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      A friend of mine came across a typo on the BestBuy website once. They were listing 5-port ethernet switches for $0.01. He ordered 10 of them, as did a coworker of his.

      I used to work at Best Buy...you'd occasionally see stuff tagged in the store at a penny because it had been on clearance for so long that they just wanted to get rid of the product. I have some cell-phone battery packs somewhere at home that I bought that way for use in projects (nothing like getting 40 NiMH cells for 8 :-) ).

      It was a fairly cool company back in '94 (when I started there), but it started losing sometime in '97 or '98. I quit in mid-'99. After a "customer-no-service" incident about a year and a half ago, I haven't been back since. Spend your "toy budget" at Circuit City or PC Club instead...that's what I've done.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:Kodak and others by dorsey · · Score: 1

      I used to work at Best Buy...you'd occasionally see stuff tagged in the store at a penny because it had been on clearance for so long that they just wanted to get rid of the product.

      This was definatly not a case of a item on clearence. It was only listed at a penny on the website for about half an hour. After that, the price went back up to $60 (the price had already been corrected by the time I was told about it).

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    9. Re:Kodak and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.bestbuysux.org -nocebo

    10. Re:Kodak and others by flatrock · · Score: 1, Troll

      2000 orders * $200 each = $400000

      They can afford some bad press for nearly half a million dollars. I also don't think that a lot of their customers are going to be that upset with them for trying to not honor the price. It was obviously an error. The reason problem seems to be arising from them honoring the price to some customers, and then not honoring it for others. It kind of makes sence to give people the boards at that price if it were just a few, because it it isn't worth the bad press and upset customers. When you're talking about $400000, it makes more sence to live with a little bad press. If this was a smaller retailer a mistake like this could easily put them out of business. It doesn't make sense that people should be able to lose their jobs and that kind of money over a misprint of a price, even if it wasn't caught immediately.

    11. Re:Kodak and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that ebonics math? These Best Buy only has $45.88 in each card (as stated in consumer pricing and wholesale discount disclosure D2-5386S11)

      So even if they do honor the correct price they will make money. 99.9% of the stuff made is dirt cheap yet it has between 300-1000% markups. Dont belive me do the checking your self its all there public record.

    12. Re:Kodak and others by bmw · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember that little amazon.com fiasco a while back? A particular hardware company (I don't recall the name) that sells their products through amazon.com made an error in their pricing. Of course, a multitude of people discovered this and word quickly spread over IRC and other mediums. People immediately began purchasing large amounts of hardware at extremely low prices (we're talking a gig of RAM for $30 or so). I was fortunate enough to become aware of this error during the time period when it was going on and just happened to have a bit of money in my bank account. So I thought to myself "What the heck, this is a great opportunity to possibly get some really cheap hardware." and went ahead and placed an order for 2 256mb DIMMs of PC133 RAM for only $20. A few minutes after placing my order I received the standard email confirmation including the quoted price. At this point I was fairly sure that something good would come of this, though I was worried about how many other people had placed similar (and far more ridiculous) orders. A few days later I received another email including an apology from the hardware manufacturer that had made the error, as well as a $15 certificate (paid for by that manufacturer) good for anything on amazon.com. While I was a bit bummed that I didn't get the RAM, I was pretty happy with this since I really didn't expect to get my order, as it would have surely put the company out of business to honor all of them. Instead I ended up with a very good Albert Einstein book (Ideas and Opinions - I highly recommend it), which I ordered around midnight on the day my certificate was set to expire ;).

      Naturally, not everyone who placed orders during this little event got gift certificates. The reason, of course, is that quite a few people placed orders that were just outrageous, while the order I placed seemed very legit. A word of advice to anyone who comes across something like this: Make your order believable!

    13. Re:Kodak and others by Computer! · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      They can afford some bad press for nearly half a million dollars.

      Not quite. According to their financials, they're a US$5BIL company. Half a million, that they probably spend on their company Christmas party. On the other hand, how many /. readers have seen this site? How many others? Half a million, maybe? I'm sure Best Buy is willing to pay a dollar per to make us like them again. Unfortunately, they won't get that chance. Lesson: don't piss off your customers just because you made a mistake.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    14. Re:Kodak and others by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      Spend your "toy budget" at Circuit City or PC Club instead...that's what I've done.

      I agree about PC Club (bought my last machine from them), but aren't we still mad at Circuit City for the DIVX (the crippled DVD, not the codec) fiasco?

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    15. Re:Kodak and others by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Spend your "toy budget" at Circuit City or PC Club instead...that's what I've done.

      I agree about PC Club (bought my last machine from them), but aren't we still mad at Circuit City for the DIVX (the crippled DVD, not the codec) fiasco?

      Maybe it's just me, but I suspect that the Apex AD600A more than makes up for Divx. It's the perfect tool for giving the MPAA a big "fsck you people in the neck." :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    16. Re:Kodak and others by Zeio · · Score: 5, Informative

      The worst part of this all is that the "new" price of $399 is horrible. They are also trying to shirk with a $30 coupon. Link below.

      Here are a few links to show you how to find a deal on this card, Vision Tek part number 30001522 :

      Pricewatch Search for 30001522

      Tip on searching Pricewatch (my favorite); the url format is: [http://brook.pricewatch.com/search/search.asp?cri teria=item_criteria_here]

      Streetprices Search for 30001522

      Pricegrabber Search, I don't like Price-grabber, but its here to show that even a crappy Shylock engine is better than Worst Buy ©(TM)®.

      BEST BUY charged with FRAUD:
      Best Buy & HRS Credit Insurance Fraud to their customers. Big Ripoff Scam!

      Story also covered here:
      http://www.theinquirer.net/10020202.htm

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/24005.html

      http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/19176/

      http://courses.wcupa.edu/jredingt/BestBuy.htm

      http://www.hardocp.com/

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/24041 . tml Worst Buy Highway Robbery Inc. Trying to give only $30 bucks for mistake.

      http://hypothermia.gamershardware.com/

      http://hypothermia.gamershardware.com/articles/bes tbuy_gf4deal.html

      http://hypothermia.gamershardware.com/articles/bb_ arrest.html

      http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/4/24/11357/3033 .

      I have had horrible experience with them as well. I won't even go into it, but they tried to do something fraudulent and were obstinate about owning up to it.

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    17. Re:Kodak and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Better yet, give the weasely little SOB a call at home:

      Robert Hill
      Card 2035 Carthage Rd
      Tucker, GA 30084-6038
      (770) 938-2378

      Now WHAT was the URL of that company that'll send a few pounds of dog shit to any given address you like?

    18. Re:Kodak and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now WHAT was the URL of that company that'll send a few pounds of dog shit to any given address you like?

      Just send it yourself.

    19. Re:Kodak and others by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      From your links, I don't see this as a "terrible price" at $400 (I rounded up). Most of the searcehs you linked to had the bulk of the entries at $350 or above. Take into account that you have to pay shipping, and then wait for the damn card to come in the mail when you're buying online. Paying an extra $35 (most would be at least $365 incl shipping) in order to get the card right now, here, at this very moment is not that bad when compared to other things.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    20. Re:Kodak and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheapest was $335, assume 20 for overnight, okay, 355, and you don't get a PFY store manager trying to throw you in jail.

      I have deprecated stores like Fry's and Best Thief. They are full of idiots, they are rude, you pay to underwrite their stupid existences.

      The only other time I feel like killing people is talking to AT&T's cable modem service representatives and trying to explain that I have God amounts of experience with computer hardware and networking.

      I am sick of mediocrity. I would rather pay etailers, small Chinese Taiwan shops, and fuck these Ingram distributors and all the other screwballs in the middle.

      I run the IT stuff here in addition to my other duties, I only go to retailers as an emergency, the rest of the stuff is ordered from CDW, AFTER I check Pricewatch and make CDW match the lowest price.

      I also live in the Bay Area, most of the Chinese e-tailers are based around here, so I can often find the right price and run over to Fremont and pick it up, but, I dont mind waiting a day or two to save me the trouble of having to go anywhere at all.

      Death to Best Buy. Death to Retailers. Death to COMPUSA. Death to Fry's. Death to all of them. They should learn how to run more like Home Depot and Target, not quippy rude fat fucks like the pigs who used to be in Babbage's and Egghead.

    21. Re:Kodak and others by battlemarch · · Score: 1

      Actually, it should be 2000 orders * (cost of card - $129) = ? I have a hard time believing the cards wholesale at $329 or more.

      --
      Oh, come, come, come. Without a monster or two, it's hardly a quest... merely a gaggle of friends wandering about. - Owl
    22. Re:Kodak and others by corian · · Score: 1


      > Neither actually expected to get the switches, but a week later, my friend got his switches, and his credit card was only charged a dime!

      free shipping? huh!

    23. Re:Kodak and others by flatrock · · Score: 2

      You have a good point. The "cost of card" should include the total cost they spend buying the cards from distributers wharehousing, shipping, advertising, and selling the card, but the number is probably considerably less than $329. They are also losing some potential customers who would have purchased the cards at retail, but no longer need the card.

    24. Re:Kodak and others by flatrock · · Score: 2

      There's no way VisionTek can manufacture those cards for that price. Where is this "consumer pricing and wholesale discount disclosure D2-5386S11?" From Hypothermia's web site it doesn't even look like Best Buy has responded to the AG yet. Why would they be releasing the wholesale price? I'd be happy to check the public record if you'd like to point me in the right direction, but until I see some proof, I don't believe that number is even close to credible.

    25. Re:Kodak and others by einer · · Score: 1

      fwiw: "Shylock" (in addition to being a character in a Bill Shakespeare play) is a derogatory term found insulting by most jewish people. Just fyi.

    26. Re:Kodak and others by Zeio · · Score: 1

      Puleeeeze. That's like black people getting mad at Mark Twain for the "N" word.

      More critical treatment of the play, The Merchant of Venice, show that Shakespeare supported Shylock in an ethical sense, and that he was not wrong for demanding the pound of flesh.

      You are wrong to think I have not read The Merchant of Venice, and that I do not understand what it means.

      And, you are supporting a Stereotype - YOU. I think Shylock is a cheap ass (although he never broke any laws, in fact, Bassanio did by not fulfilling his end of the agreement).

      YOU are the one who correlates being a cheap ass Shylock to being Jewish. I resent the insinuation that I do the same, as I am an ardent supporter of the nation of Israel (and its largely secular and western culture) and am familiar with Judaism.

      Shylock was a successful moneylender who is much maligned over the practice of moneylenders such as himself of charging interest. He lends the 3000 ducats Bassanio needs to court Portia and hopefully, pay off his debts to Antonio. There is however a catch; if the debt is not repaid, Antonio as security will forfeit one pound of his flesh. It is Shylock who is responsible for the immortal lines, "If you prick us, do we not bleed? if you tickle us, do we not laugh? if you poison us, do we not die? and if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?" (Act III, Scene I, Lines 63-72).

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    27. Re:Kodak and others by einer · · Score: 2

      Ahem...

      I never implied that you hadn't read the Merchant of Venice. I implied that it was possible that you didn't understand what the word 'Shylock' meant. I don't equate being cheap with being Jewish and I resent your implication as much as, I'm sure, you resented my perceived insinuation that you do. I didn't call you an anti-semite, I didn't insinuate that you correlate 'being a cheap ass Shylock to being Jewish.' What you read into my reply was a gross misinterpretation. Please re-read my post with a less cynical eye. I was attempting to correct, what I perceived to be, a mis-spoken, unintentionaly insensitive comment. Maybe the word 'Shylock' is not derogatory where you are, but it is most definately a perjorative here, connoting as much spite and intolerance as the word 'kike' or 'nigger.'

      From m-w.com

      Main Entry: shylock

      Pronunciation: 'shI-"läk

      Function: noun

      1 capitalized : the Jewish usurer and antagonist of Antonio in Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice

      2 : an extortionate creditor : Loan Shark

      Andrew

    28. Re:Kodak and others by Zeio · · Score: 0, Troll

      I choose meaning two in reference to Best Buy.

      Look, don't go looking for things to be offended by, or point it out. I am offended by lots of things, like communists and socialists, but I would never point it out to them. I live and work with people who spout rhetoric which is anti-constitutional and deconstructive of the principles of what I believe in; but I choose to be successful and pursue my own dream rather than try and teach them the "meaning of life," whatever that is - because its subjective anyway.

      I hate politically correct. Everything is no holds barred. That's my attitude. Everything and anything one says could be construed as being offensive; I refuse to allow myself to care.

      I wanted to paint a grim image of Best Buy; I wanted to use strong words. Reflecting on the Merchant of Venice and when Shylock asked Antonio for his pound of flesh, I realize that Best Buy is even lower! Shylock is too kind of a term for Best Buy - at least Shylock had contractual terms to ask for the payment of his debt.

      I have never been offended by a word in particular, that is like trying to ban the use of the work, let's say, Fuck (on TV and Radio). It doesn't work, it still gets used, probably more so because its taboo. I suggest that when reading posts, especially wading through the quagmire that is the comment section on Slashdot, that you not be offended by words, especially when the use of them was not and is not intended to be anti-Semitic or racist in any way.

      And finally, about the works kyke and the "N" word. Kyke is derived from a word meaning circle; this is a reference to the kipah or yarmulke. The "N" word, which I dare not say, because this incite the most irrational response, its rooted in a word meaning black, and is used in parlance in ghettos everyday to have more meanings that the word SMURF.

      Let forget about it all, but I would suggest you take the Politically Correct hat off, it is annoying.

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    29. Re:Kodak and others by DrDave · · Score: 0
      This is the same Best Buy that used the city of Richfield, Minnesota to confiscate an auto dealership's property and 12 other businesses and about 60 homes (affordable) to build their new world headquarters.

      http://www.ci.richfield.mn.us/officials/Commission s/hra_agendas/0618%20agenda/01hra046.htm

      --
      Is this a rhetorical question?
    30. Re:Kodak and others by einer · · Score: 2

      Couldn't care less about political correctness. (As an aside, I live with a school teacher who loathes the word 'retarded'. I refuse to stop using this word, as it accurately describes the condition of my ignition timing, and the learning ability of some people.) Initially, I pointed out, and I thought quite clearly, that you used a word that could be interpreted to be a racially motivated slight. I attached no ethical value to that statement. I didn't call you a bigot.

      Everything and anything one says could be construed as being offensive; I refuse to allow myself to care.


      A person who didn't allow themselves to care wouldn't bother with a reply, no? Well, that is neither here nor there.

      It's forgotten, but I would suggest that you take the Overly Defensive hat off, it is annoying.

    31. Re:Kodak and others by Zeio · · Score: 1

      I'm actually enjoying this thread now. I get the feeling you may not be an enemy. I took off my overly defensive hat. ;p

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
  2. Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm guessing they have a disclaimer on their web site. "We reserve the right to cancel sales in the event of errors" or somewhat. Don't know if it'll hold up in court, but it seems somewhat reasonable to me. It's not like they took the money and didn't give it back. Although I guess it would make a difference if the credit card was charged, and that would be the equivalent of money actually changing hands.

    1. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.bestbuy.com/infoCenter/Policies/Deliver y.asp#2

      Best Buy may, at its own discretion, limit or cancel quantities purchased per person, per household or per order. These restrictions may include orders placed by the same BestBuy.com account, credit card, and also orders which use the same billing and/or shipping address. Notification will be sent to the e-mail and/or billing address provided should such change occur. We reserve the right to limit the quantities sold, including the right to limit or prohibit sales to dealers.

      Prices and availability are subject to change without notice. Errors will be corrected where discovered, and Best Buy reserves the right to revoke any stated offer and to correct any errors, inaccuracies or omissions including after an order has been submitted and whether or not the order has been confirmed and your credit card charged. If your credit card has already been charged for the purchase and your order is cancelled, BestBuy.com will issue a credit to your credit card account in the amount of the charge. Individual bank policies will dictate when this amount is credited to your account.

      While Best Buy takes steps to ensure the accuracy and completeness of product and third-party services provided, please refer to the originator of information for details, for example the manufacturer for complete product details.

    2. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even so, that's no excuse for the whole "arresting" fiasco.

    3. Re:Disclaimer? by jmauro · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Putting a disclaimer on a page doesn't either make it true or enforcable. Many things can override silly disclaimers. (Like laws conserning advertising fairness). They're usually there to scare people off from actually following through when harmed. Because if it's in a disclaimer, it must be true.

    4. Re:Disclaimer? by MaxwellStreet · · Score: 2

      An advertisement (wherever placed) is legally considered an "invitation to make an offer" - and is not considered an enforceable contract.

      It's bad press, but errors in advertising are not legally enforceable.

      As for having the guy arrested, we really don't know how this fellow was behaving.

      If it were my store, and he was creating a disturbance and acting threatening, I'd imagine that I'd call the police too.

      Of course, if it were my store, I'd honor the offer for fear of bad publicity, and charge it back to corporate headquarters or whatever. The price difference cannot be worth the bad blood that this is going to generate.

    5. Re:Disclaimer? by macrom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure they have a disclaimer, but is the disclaimer legal? They're basically telling you that they can change the price of a product at any time, regardless of when the purchase was made. That sounds rather fishy to me. One would think that Best Buy has a decent legal team, but if it's anything like the team of people in their stores...well, most people here know what I mean.

      So the question now (probably) becomes : Does Best Buy really have the right to arbitrarily change the price on any item you purchase, just because the disclaimer says so?

    6. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actualy its exactly as if they took the money and dint give it back.
      from my understanding.. they have NOT refunded the credit cards that have been charged.

    7. Re:Disclaimer? by Sokie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the main problem is that they honored the price for some people. IANAL, but it seems like once they did that, they lost the right to refuse to honor it for everyone who ordered before it was corrected. If they had just held firm to begin with and promptly refunded customers their money, then the people complaining wouldn't have much of a leg to stand on.

      It's arbitraty discrimination about who does and doesn't get a card that may get them in trouble here.

      --Sokie

      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
    8. Re:Disclaimer? by ADRA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It says it will cancel the order, not jack up the price and still force you to buy it. The difference is VERY important. The worst that can happen is that you have to re-order the product at the higher price.

      --
      Bye!
    9. Re:Disclaimer? by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Yep. The only thing you can do in the case of 'False Advertising' is get a Cease & Desist order to stop the advertising, but you don't get to sue their pants off.

      I think that if it was a typo, and they can prove it (i.e., records of what the price was supposed to be and someone in data entry f'ed it up), then all of you whining that you want your $129 video card need to smack yourself in the forehead and pay up if you really want one.

      If a store manager or other higher level employee (maybe even clerks, I'm not sure how they fit in) tells you that that is the price, that is a lot different. It is no longer an advertisement, but an offer for a contract. If you accept and agree to pay that price, then yes, you are entitled to your very cheap video card. Just because you say the advertisement somewhere and click 'ok' doesn't mean you're entitled to that price.

      --
      What?
    10. Re:Disclaimer? by K_E_Morr · · Score: 1

      I would think the law governing prices as marked in a store would follow to a website. If a clerk mismarks a product and you buy it, they can't (legally) chase you down and make you either a) give it back, or b) pay more for it. It seems to me that if his credit card was charged then the deal was done disclaimer or not. (It doesn't help them that, in my eyes, the have THE worst help I have ever dealt with in my life)
      "Not my department"
      "I'm going on break now"
      "No you can't have the floor model or a raincheck, come back in 2 days and we'll have more"
      And so on

    11. Re:Disclaimer? by GungaDan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      From the Best Buy disclaimer: "Notification will be sent to the e-mail and/or billing address provided should such change occur."

      Anybody know if they sent notification to these people as stated (by e-mail or postal mail)? I would think that a nail in the disclaimer's coffin if they didn't.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    12. Re:Disclaimer? by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 2

      If they charge your credit card, they sure as heck are accepting your offer to buy the product at the listed price. How should they be allowed to back out of a deal after money has already changed hands?

    13. Re:Disclaimer? by arkanes · · Score: 2

      I placed an order for one via the website, and got an email saying they had canceled the order, a coupon for a discount on future orders, and no money changed hands - since it was a preorder, they don't charge until they ship. I'm not sure of the policy with physical stores, but if any of them allowed people to PAY in advance, at the listed price, I'd say they're pooched.

    14. Re:Disclaimer? by Peyna · · Score: 2

      In that case they shouldn't be allowed to back out of the deal. But that contract is only with one specific person. They don't have to sell it to everyone else for the same price if they change it before making contracts with other people. Otherwise raising or lowering prices on any product at any time would be illegal =]

      --
      What?
    15. Re:Disclaimer? by FedeB · · Score: 1

      Once you agreed to do the operation they have to give what they promised otherwise the will be breaking what was agreed by both at the time you preordered the card, and the same way the would sue you in case you dont pay, you can sue them, and of course win, if they dont fulfill their part.

    16. Re:Disclaimer? by drunkmonk · · Score: 2, Informative

      One would think that Best Buy has a decent legal team, but if it's anything like the team of people in their stores...

      A LOT of companies have disclaimers and things like that that are illegal (and I don't know if this one is or not) but nobody finds that out unless someone challenges it. Thus they save paying out tons of money to people that decide not to try to sue because of the stated policy.

      It's sleazy, but what isn't?

    17. Re:Disclaimer? by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      In the past, and I believe its still this way, whenever you order something your card shouldn't be charged until its ready to ship. Back in the olden days (early 90's) I'd see this stated as a law in Computer Shopper's advice section on mail order, web sites should have to follow the same thing, I think, but IANAL. So the card probably wouldn't be charged right away when you buy something on a website that has an incorrect price.

    18. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um problem with that --- they put holds on funds on peoples cards --- bingo, acceptance of offer, thus a binding contract.

    19. Re:Disclaimer? by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      we really don't know how this fellow was behaving
      Well considering I have yet to be near the Best Buy computer help desk dealie and not see/hear someone completely losing their shit and cursing the employees out, I wouldn't be surprised if he got a little irate, though the police report does make it sound like simply asking a question got him arrested. Seriously, Best Buy is like the worst store known to man IMHO.
    20. Re:Disclaimer? by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      Have people claimed that their credit card was charged? I do lots of ordering over the web, sometimes ordering stuff that hasn't been released yet, and from what I've seen most companies don't charge until it ships.

    21. Re:Disclaimer? by mshiltonj · · Score: 1

      Prices and availability are subject to change without notice. Errors will be corrected where discovered, and Best Buy reserves the right to revoke any stated offer and to correct any errors, inaccuracies or omissions including after an order has been submitted and whether or not the order has been confirmed and your credit card charged.

      You gotta love corporations.

      They have legions of lawyers to pummel whatever they percieve as a threat, yet still manage to couch every statement they make with disclaimer text like this or obtuse legal agreements, that amount to changing this:

      [statement by corporation]

      into:

      We announce [statement by corporation] but we do not mean it, and we are not responsible for anything that might happen because of it.

      Does every American now need to have a law degree now before crawling out of bed?

    22. Re:Disclaimer? by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 1

      I had ordered one (after reading about the price on a previous Slashdot article). I did receive a notification email explaining the error and apologizing for the inconvenience.

      I gave up and assumed it was a lost cause. I have to dig through my home account and see if I saved the email.

      To be honest, I had expected the response I received. Now that I read the lies and other stunts they are pulling and the abuse they are giving customers, I'm annoyed. The fact that they are caving in for some customers also makes me want to try to get the card. The "Why should they get it and not me?" attitude. ;)

    23. Re:Disclaimer? by pehowell · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe according to VISA/MASTERCARD rules and regulations as long as they ship within 30 days of actually charging you, everything is cool. If it's backordered over 30, then they have to provide you with a refund unless you authorize something else. They have a huge book of rules that all merchants accepting their cards must follow.

    24. Re:Disclaimer? by timothy_m_smith · · Score: 1

      The thing is that many of these scenarios it is not the legal challenge that wins it, but rather the PR challenge. United Airlines had a pricing mistake where it was selling tickets to places like Paris for $0 plus taxes. (see this story - point number 5) At first United refused to honor the fares, but as the bad PR built, they decided to honor the fares anyway. I wouldn't be suprised if these Best Buy customers are just hoping to make enough bad press that BBY will honor the prices after all.

    25. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they have the right to change the price! Just like you have the right not to buy from them. The only reason they ever cave-in is to avoid negative publicity. What's sleazy about that? If you send me an email and say you'll sale me your new dvd+rw for $50.00 don't you think you would say 'I meant $500'??

      You \.'s are dumb.

    26. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US law requires that a mail order seller NOT charge a credit card until the order is actually shipped. If Best Buy charges the card, then they must have already shipped the order--and therefore can't really cancel it now, can they--or they've already broken the law.

      There's the proof that their disclaimer is hot air.

    27. Re:Disclaimer? by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      Actaully in california once the transaction thru your CC has gone thru they are legally bound to honor the contract. You as the card holder and Visa reserve the right to cancel a completed transaction. There is no way BestBuy COULD have canceled or altered a signed transaction and have it legally binding.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    28. Re:Disclaimer? by flatrock · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you read the letter from the AG which is on the web page, it seems like the issue isn't them canceling all the orders. It seems like the issue is that they are honoring the price for some people and not for others. It seems like that MAY be illegal, and least in some cases.

      Does Best Buy really have the right to arbitrarily change the price on any item you purchase, just because the disclaimer says so?

      Is anyone really stating that they are arbitrarily doing this? Someone made an error. They don't want to have to honor erroreous prices, which in this case would cost them over half a million dollars for the 2000 customers that placed orders. They are also canceling before the products were shipped.

    29. Re:Disclaimer? by CathedralRulz · · Score: 1
      That disclaimer is perfectly legal and makes sense.

      People ought to be reasonable here. That so many /.'ers here are bitching about this shows how they are just a bunch of whiny assholes.

    30. Re:Disclaimer? by amuro98 · · Score: 2

      They can say whatever they want, doesn't make it enforceable.

      Once you click that "Submit" button, you are agreeing to buy Product X at Price Y.

      Once the website says "Order accepted", they're aggreeing to sell you Product X at Price Y.

      What Best Buy is essentially doing is chasing you down as you leave the store, and snatching your(!) purchase out of your hands saying "We decided not to sell it to you."

      Personally, I hope Best Buy gets burned really badly by this. It's not like this is the first time a website has screwed up their pricing database, and whenever there was a disupte, the customers won - every time.

    31. Re:Disclaimer? by amuro98 · · Score: 2

      No, Best Buy is just being stupid.

      In this case, the customers and Best Buy have signed a contract regarding the sale of the video card at a specified price. Best Buy could certainly say "Oops, we screwed up, would you mind cancelling your order?" but the customers are under no obligation to do so.

      BTW, this applies to person-to-person sales as well. A friend of mine accidentally listed an item on eBay for way too little money (eg. $10 instead of $100.) He tried to cancel the auction, but it had already ended, and he had to honor the contract to sell the item to the winner at the price he bid.

      Mistakes happen. The best thing Best Buy could have done was to just silently honor the orders while correcting the listing on their website. By trying to reneg on the orders, Best Buy is begging to be dragged into court as the defendent in a class action lawsuit. Should be a very quick case as there's been plenty of other cases of this type involving other stupid companies. In each case, the company lost, BTW. IANAL, but that's a pretty clear and easy precedent...

    32. Re:Disclaimer? by bastion_xx · · Score: 1

      It's a little different when you make a purchase at a store vs. the 'net. Until they ship the product to you, it's still an order, no matter if you hit the "submit" button or not.


      I'd say it is similar to someone in the store writing up a sales order for price $x, then having the front register deny it based on the wrong price. I love getting deals too, but this is just a group of people trying to get a product based on a couple/few stores honoring an obviously whacked price.

    33. Re:Disclaimer? by LadyLucky · · Score: 2

      Dont know about the US, but in NZ, if they have advertised a price, then the retailer must honour it, even in the case they have put up an "oops we stuffed up" sign. I was an underling at a large retail store when i was younger, and had to let several products be sold at far below what they were intended.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    34. Re:Disclaimer? by Computer! · · Score: 2

      Fucking-ay right! I am so sick of legal vultures taking their 20% off the top of the American economy. It seems like oversimplfication, but if people would just do the right thing, we wouldn't need to hire a lawyer to sue the lawyers that write bullshit like that.

      Please mod parent up.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    35. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >they are honoring the price for some people and
      >not for others. It seems like that MAY be
      >illegal, and least in some cases.

      In particular, if they are honoring the price
      for white people and not for non-white people,
      you're damn right it's illegal.

      Taken to the right venue, illegal enough to end
      up dissolving the company's right to operate.

    36. Re:Disclaimer? by jmccay · · Score: 1

      There is one sure way to avoid this happening. Don't buy online. IANAL, but when you buy it in the store, you end up with a receit. That receit is the proof of the sale agreement between yourself and the merchant. It is a legal contract, at least when you use a credit card, in which they cannot change the amount they charge you at a later date (I am not sure about other forms of payment). That would be legal, and further you could contact your credit card company and notify them of it--you'd probably need to send a photo copy of your signed credit card receit.
      The roblem with online shopping is you really don't have that same receit. Sure the put a screen up with all the items and how much they cost, but do you have a hard copy of that screen? Probably not. Even if you did, it would be a hard sell to remove the doubt that someone didn't just create the screen.
      I almost never shop online for a several reason, and this is one of them. You really don't have a "signed contractual" agreement between the merchant and yourself that you can later show as proof of the agreed upon price--in this case the price of the graphics card.
      Until online shopping comes up with a method to garentee some sort of "receit" (in hard copy/paper form) that can act in this same way, you will not have a lot of power in these disputes.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    37. Re:Disclaimer? by ozium100 · · Score: 2, Informative

      > I haven't seen anyone reply to this in quite this way, but that is NOT what the TOS was at the time this whole thing started. They were not that specific as to take it all the way to "even if your credit card has been charged". That was not in the TOS prior to this fiasco. That sentence in the original TOS stopped at "innacuracies or ommissions including after an order has been submitted." That is where it stopped. None of the rest of that paragraph was in the original TOS. Just so you know. Thanks. Oz

    38. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yeah, I take a LOT of offense to that statement.
      I happen to work for BB and while I have plenty of gripes with them, the people there (for the most part, there are jackasses everywhere) try really hard to actually do right by the customer.

      You start to wonder why when you see how big a bunch of jerks people can be sometimes.

      Like now for example, you basicly just said I am worthless in my job.

      How would you like it if, after a long day at work, you came home to find me saying that you suck at your job and do not know anything?

      Gross generalizations won't get you anywhere.
      And you wonder why people treat you like crap in stores. You are probably one of those guys that comes into the store acting like they are better than everyone. Then oddly enough you get treated poorly....I wonder why.

      As for the cards, EVERYONE, and I mean EVERYONE who ordered that KNEW something was wrong, they KNEW nobody in their right mind would sell it for that price, yet you see people ordering two or more, why?

      Because they KNEW it would get revoked and they KNEW that they'd be able to go in and start climbing down peoples throats demanding a pricematch.

      btw, I have been privy to a few of these people when they have come back in to the store, and all but one came up with an attitude, and all but one decided to forego discussion and skip straight to "You OWE me! I want my card and I want it know, I won't be happy until I get it.".

      Also do the math, if they were to honor the web-price they would lose $442,000.

      Where do you think that money will come from?
      Labor....in other words, I would get to pay because a bunch of people want to take advantage of something they knew was in error.

      Yeah, find it hard to justify.

      To further break it down, $442,000 divided by 450 stores, that's $982 per store. That is the average weekly cost of labor for my entire dept. that means people like me find it harder to make ends meet over this crap.

      Even if it wasn't me. I have placed pre-orders like this before, and they have sometimes been cancelled, sometimes not, I never fought it though because I KNEW that it was a ridiculous price.

      Anyway, just my $0.02
      Thanks for the insult and good luck to the greedy jerks amongst us. I hope the framerates are worth it.

    39. Re:Disclaimer? by einer · · Score: 2

      I often wondered how much disclaimers actually meant. A good Reductio ad absurdum argument seems to disprove the validity of disclaimers. If a disclaimer can relieve the responsibility of telling the truth, then any outrageous claim can be made without fear, so long as there is a disclaimer. For example,

      "If you sleep with me you will be taken to plains of libidinous pleasure hitherto unkown to you."

      Disclaimer: "These claims are unsubstantiated. In fact, claims to the contrary have been substantiated on numerous occasions, including one incident that involved a giraffe stuffed with whipped cream and a cactus bloom."

      Any takers? ;)

    40. Re:Disclaimer? by letxa2000 · · Score: 2
      Just because you say the advertisement somewhere and click 'ok' doesn't mean you're entitled to that price.

      I may be mistaken, IANAL, but the BestBuy thing wasn't an advertisement. It was listed in their online store. Users saw the offer, accepted it by adding it to their basket and submitting their order with their credit card number, and the order was acknowledged.

      It would be different if they had a banner ad on some site that said "$129" but upon arriving at BestBuy.com it appeared as $299 in the shopping basket.

      But here we're talking about a price that was listed on their site. Their site takes the place of a traditional salesperson making the offer. Your submitting the order takes the place of walking to checkout with the item, and their confirmation email takes the place of a printed receipt as you walk out the door.

      The price was not so low as to be unreasonable (10 cents, a dollar). The price was confirmed by not only showing the price ($129) but also showing the savings ($200). The price was confirmed by calling a store twice. Email confirmations were received. You can't say that the affected people are trying to get stuff "for free." That's not true. They are trying to pay $129 (definitely not free) for a product that was offered by BestBuy, and which they accepted.

      Yes, BestBuy screwed up. Probably it was unintentional. It's probably going to cost them half a mil plus bad PR. Tough luck; that's the downside of being a multi-billion corporation with locations in most of the states of the country. And perhaps they'll hire an extra person to verify data entry in their online store database in the future. If I were them I would have two people capturing prices separately, have them captured into two fields in the database, and only list the item online if the two prices were the same.

      In any case, the PR damage is done. I've always had a pretty warm fuzzy feeling when shopping at BestBuy. I'm in the market for a laptop within the next month and while I previously planned to just pick it up at BestBuy, I will now definitely comparison shop at Circuit City, CompUSA, and a couple of other local electronics stores. And I'll probably buy it at the competition even if it's an extra hundred bucks or so.

      Major corporations need to learn REAL FAST, right or wrong, they can no longer piss off their customers. Welcome to the Information Age.

    41. Re:Disclaimer? by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      They accepted the payment. Consumers have rights, and just because some guy sticks something on a web site does not make it a binding contract and even if it were it wouldn't make it a legally enforceable contract. You have rights, some company can't just expunge those with a URL somewhere, that goes double if they accept credit card payment. Besides, they had a customer arrested and charged with tresspass. This is a *disgrace*. Where does it say "we reserve the right to haul you off to jail on a false charge of fraud if you dare to ask for the product you ordered". Are you asleep at the keyboard?

    42. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, give me a fucking break. you can't be serious.

    43. Re:Disclaimer? by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      Is anyone really stating that they are arbitrarily doing this?

      I'll state that they are arbitrarily changing their prices.

      Rod Hill, Store Manager for Best Buy #513 in Tucker/Dekalb County, GA, had a customer arrested on Friday of last week, citing Fraud and Criminal Trespassing . Hill informed police that Abraham Cherian, an Indian American, was trying to rip off the store, the same store that had conceded to give another customer his video card as requested 10 days earlier.

      They are arbitrarily changing their prices.

      Apparently, one person (minimum) got it at the good price. Over 2,000 other customers were discriminated against. Damn, I wish I had been one of them. Not so much for the money, but to be a part of the legal bitchslap that Best Buy has coming. Nobody really wants their company to make CNN in the same breath as "class-action." A price was offered. 2K+ people bought it at that price, (probably) most of them were charged that price, and at least one person recieved it for that price. If it were an error, they need to take the loss and drive on. Bait & Switch is illegal everywhere except fishing. Best Buy needs to be slapped hard- hard enough that they would have saved money by honoring the price that people bought at. Hell, hard enough that the board decides that they would have saved money by honoring the price that people bought at.

      That's the key point here. It's not about geeks getting cheap components, it's about huge companies being financially convinced that they probably ought to obey the law some of the time. I don't care if the money they lose is in punitive damages or in fines (but it had better also be in meeting their price), but it needs to be enough money to make every board member certain to never allow abuse like this again, not to mention enough for other companies to learn something from the lesson of Best Buy.

      As for our friend Rod Hill, I'd say that Cherian has an open and shut case against both him personally and Best Buy. I hope Hill liked owning his own house. Hell, I hope he liked living in his own house. Read the police report in the link. If Hill's store actually honored the low price 10 days earlier, he's going to be lucky to stay out of jail for what he did to Cherian. Add the fact that Cherian's an Indian American and you can even make it into a "hate crime." I wonder if the customer that Hill chose to honor the price for was white? I don't like twisting laws like that, but if Cherian has a lawyer who is even barely literate, that's the kind of crap that Hill is going to face. Best Buy, too, for tolerating this sort of behavior from management. So much easier to honor your contracts, folks.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    44. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a large outdoor equipment store. Our rules for price tags work like this: If the price marked is more than the price in the computer, we give the cheaper price. If the price on the tag is less than the price in the computer because we didn't put a new sticker on it, we honor the cheaper price. Fuck BB for not honoring the price on their website. Fuck you for bitching about the money your store will lose. Bitch to your company web division to not fuck up anymore.

    45. Re:Disclaimer? by amuro98 · · Score: 2

      I consider the "Submit" button on the website equivelant to signing the credit card receipt - which, if you ever read it, says that you are agreeing to pay the amount indicated.

      If the store says it costs $X, but charges your card something else, that's illegal.

      If the store says it costs $X, and you sign the form/authorize the charge to your card, the store can't suddenly say "Nope, we changed our mind!"

      It's a contract. You can't just go breaking contracts willy-nilly - I don't care if you're joe-sixpack or a Megacorp. That's the nifty thing about the law...it applies equally to everyone.

    46. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >As for our friend Rod Hill, I'd say that Cherian
      >has an open and shut case against both him
      >personally and Best Buy.

      I've asked Best Buy to look into whether making false statements to a Georgia peace officer is a felony. Forget the boycott. This is a hate crime, and Hill should be behind bars.

      To me, that's the core issue of this case.

    47. Re:Disclaimer? by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 1

      That's funny I used to work at an outdoor store too. Ramsey Outdoor actually, the one on the Sopranos. Anyway we used to have a problem with people stealing tag-guns and switching pricetags. The way we could catch them rather than a mistake or old tag was to have merchandise and department codes.
      Actually it was rather easy to catch crooks because they would do it with multiple items and often drastically change the prices on rather expensive items. IE. They would retag a 200 dollar tent for 50. Whereas our mistake might be a $20 latern marked at $10. If we screwed up an advertised price we would honor it until we ran out of stock as we would a normal sale item.
      Treat customers well and they will be customers for life.

    48. Re:Disclaimer? by ScottKin · · Score: 1

      It's so entertaining to read posts on /. - where the supposedly "intellectual elite" who are smart enough to use *nix OS's, and they can't even spell a simple word like "receipt"...even more so when they use cute constructs lile "IANAL". He even spelled "contractual" correctly, but totally whiffled on "receit"

      may-b they're just 2 31337 to spel rite.

      ScottKin - doing as James Tiberius Kirk said: "...I'm LAUGHING at the 'Superior Intellect'..."

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
    49. Re:Disclaimer? by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      I've asked Best Buy to look into whether making false statements to a Georgia peace officer is a felony. Forget the boycott. This is a hate crime, and Hill should be behind bars.

      I'm with you, but I really don't like the classification of "hate crimes." Why shouldn't committing crimes against other people be worthy of punishment? Why should there be a sentencing differential based on the relative color of the perp's skin and the victims? Is a couple of rednecks beating a homosexual to death actually worse than their beating another redneck to death? Oh. Bad example. It actually is a bigger loss to society. But how about most other crimes? All the hate crime label does is officially charge the defendant with being retarded. Duh.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    50. Re:Disclaimer? by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      this is NOT bait& switch. That's where a company says, here's this great thing for say $100, when you come in to get it, they say, we're all out of that, but how about you buy this instead, it costs 10 times as much, and isn't as good, but you want it anyways. This is just a typo in the system, including the billing system. It wasn't done on purpose and nobody was forced to buy the card at $400, they had a choice to either take the refund and go away or order it at the higher price. I personally agree with Best Buy on the "We don't have to honor this price." The part I don't agree with is them giving it to some people and not others. Other than that they're totally in their right, even if it does give them a little bad PR.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    51. Re:Disclaimer? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      He tried to cancel the auction, but it had already ended, and he had to honor the contract to sell the item to the winner at the price he bid.

      That was dumb. He should have used another account or had one of his friends (i.e., you) get the winning bid. He'd have been out the cost of the auction, a couple of bucks.

      But hell yeah, Best Buy is being stupid. Between the bad press and the upcoming lawsuits, it's gonna cost them way more than the measly half million simply honoring the sales would have.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    52. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Albany we have a Best Buy and a CompUSA.

      Believe me when I tell you that no matter how weak you might think Best Buy is, the CompUSA in this neck of the woods is really a bottom feeder. I'd go mail order before buying from them. Other parts of the country may have different stories to tell.

    53. Re:Disclaimer? by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      You're right. This is worse than bait & switch. After calling the customer service number multiple times to confirm the price, ordering it,being charged for it and recieving confirmations, the store cancelled people's orders and failed to refund their money. They didn't even bother use a separate product to charge the higher price for.

      Other than that they're totally in their right? Other than what, discriminating? It's okay to do the right thing for some of your customers? The main "other than that" problem I have isn't the after sale lying and arresting- those are crimes. The main problem is that after customers made every effort possible to verfy the low price and then ordered it, Best Buy took their money. A transaction had taken place. The money was out of people's cards. You have to honor a price if you have already taken that price as payment.

      Rather than taking a mistake (miscalculation? It was too organised to be a typo) in stride, Best Buy decided to rectify it with a bigger mistake. There's no point in having customer service people if they don't have access to information that the customers don't. If the CS reps at the phone bank were simply looking at the same web site the customers were looking at, then Best Buy deserved to take a bath on this one. If upper management were smart enough to see that they were committed and gone along with what they had to do, none of this would have happened. Now they're really committed. Their store managers are lying, racist cretins and they have no company wide policy on discrimination. That's a bad spot to be in. They've generated hatred where it wouldn't have occurred to anyone to get upset.

      If they had done it right, geeks would be telling this story for years- They posted this great deal, realized what had happened, and took it down. I ordered just in time. Lots of guys were pissed that they didn't order soon enough. Now not only are geeks going to be talking about it for years, but civil liberties groups will be, too. I want to see the TIME with Rod Hill's picture on the cover. That'll go over real well at the next board meeting.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    54. Re:Disclaimer? by Romancer · · Score: 2

      "This is just a typo in the system, including the billing system. It wasn't done on purpose and nobody was forced to buy the card at $400, they had a choice to either take the refund and go away or order it at the higher price."

      They were not given refunds, Best Buy still has most of the people's money that have not called their credit card companies and requested a "denial of payment" to that transaction from Best Buy.

      It's more than a bait and switch, it's a "Give me your money and I'll give you this product, oh wait, no, I'll give you nothing, oh wait, I'll give you the option of nothing, or being arrested, oh wait, I'll give you a class action laws.... oh wait, I'm fired."

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    55. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the folks at Hypothermia, they updated the disclaimer after the fact. They apparently have a mirror of both versions -- check out the site linked in the main story for details.

    56. Re:Disclaimer? by Romancer · · Score: 2

      The police report is not for disorderly conduct or harassment, they arrested him because they had "red flagged" the "video card customers" that came in to be arrested.

      He walked in and asked why he didn;t get his card, they called the cops and he was arrested for asking a question, after the cops found out what exactly Best Buy was pulling, they let him go.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    57. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actaully accepted a job at CompUSA that was supposed to be out of the store (i.e. on site repair work). I had been out of work for several month, I needed to pay my bills!

      My second day on the job I learned I would be spending a minimum of 4 months in the store. Now, had the position been presented as such it wouldn't have bothered me at all. It was not however. I was told I would do the 5 day CompSTAR training program and be out on my merry way.

      BZZZT! Wrong!

      My two days there convinced me that 1) noone in the store cares about anything, customers or the store and 2) they are VERY BADLY managed across the board.

      Of course it's my fault for taking the job, I should have known how it would be from shopping there in the past. The clue-meter for everyone working there is always reading zero!

    58. Re:Disclaimer? by Roblimo · · Score: 2

      A few years back I ordered a laptop from Dell through their Web site, then got a call from one of their people telling me the price was wrong, it was $135 (more or less) higher than shown on the site. I cancelled the order -- and they didn't make it easy, let me tell you.

      Since then I've bought three computers for my wife and myself. None of these purchases have been from Dell.

      I have nothing against Dell; they can run their business however they like. But I am not going to buy from them, ever.

      - Robin

    59. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, i dont know how things work in the US, but afaik over here in the UK they'd be perfectly entitled to not sell at an advertised price. afaik an advertisement does not constitute an agreement (which is why adverts often say something like "E&OE" - errors and omissions excepted or some such like).

      obviously once you place your order or agree to the price in writing or verbally then they have entered a binding agreement but until that their is no agreement between 2 parties to honour. their is legislation covering misleading advertising to stop people saying one thing and knowing it not to be true.

      of course, i'm no lawyer, but thats my understanding of things...

      ph.

    60. Re:Disclaimer? by LordNyuknyuk · · Score: 1

      Similar system here in .AU where (I believe) that if an item is advertised at a certain price, and is then found to be an error after an order has been made (ie the item has been scanned at a checkout, or purchased online), the first item is offered for FREE and then each subsequent item is offered at the lower price. However, this is mainly for supermarkets, but not having a Best Buy type arrangement this could well apply to such a place, unless they are exempted.

      --
      My other .sig is a Mercedes | Your innocence is treasure your innocence is death your innocence is all
    61. Re:Disclaimer? by flatrock · · Score: 2

      That may very well be true in the case of the guy the one manager had arrested. If it is true, then in that case, that manager should be in serious trouble.

      I strongly doubt that racisim was the issue in most of the cases. It's more likely some of the managers decided to honor the price to keep some customres happy, then the policy came down from higher up in Best Buy not to honor the price.

    62. Re:Disclaimer? by flatrock · · Score: 2

      They were not given refunds, Best Buy still has most of the people's money that have not called their credit card companies and requested a "denial of payment" to that transaction from Best Buy.

      I saw that it looked liked people didn't see their refunds show up instantly on their credit cards, but that may simply be an issue with how the credit card companies process refunds.

      Look at the receipts posted on the Hypothermia's web page. Those people paid for thier cards when they got them. I don't think they'd be doing that if they hadn't gotten their refunds. If Best Buy actually canceled the orders and didn't refund the money, there'd be a lot more legal allegations flying around, and they be in serious trouble with the credit card companies as well.

    63. Re:Disclaimer? by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      Is that how it works?

      Best Buy HQ: We just lost $500,000!

      Best Buy VP: Hm. We must find somewhere to make that money back...

      Best Buy HQ: We have an idea.

      Store XQ53R Manager: Hey you, stock boy, give us a dollar, eh?

      Nah. It doesn't work like that.

    64. Re:Disclaimer? by Romancer · · Score: 2

      The receipts on the page are from rainchecks and people who did get their orders canceled, a couple friends of mine only got their money back only after 6 business days after they filed for a refund through their credit card companies.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    65. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when a merchant put disclaimer, it is intended to scare those consumer who are fussy. Although, I believe that it is not appropriate from the point of view that they(merchant) can change the price as they like. But with current situation, Best Buy has in fact charge them, so there is already an contract agreeement that they will sell it to you. Worse comes to worse, if there is price error, they could simply offer alternatives or something else and not to call cops! Now, not only they will hurt their reputation, they would lose money too.

    66. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I -won't- buy online from some retailers.

      At least if I go into the store, they can't screw me so easily. I hate the idea of ordering something online, and then discovering days later that the etailer has either changed or cancelled all or part of my order.

    67. Re:Disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BEst bUY sure isn't being reasonable, so why should the customers?

  3. Cowboys and Indians by dattaway · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The Indian was arrested and..."

    The police report seems to have an old fashioned Western approach to law and order.

    1. Re:Cowboys and Indians by Sunkist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      not that it matters much but doesn't NATIVE AMERICAN refer to the "Indian" part of the "cowboys and indians" mentioned here. So in this case, maybe Indian American means someone from India.

      in all, it is just stooopid that ethinicity plays any part b/c labels are not what is at point here.

      --
      No, Vern. They just let him in.
    2. Re:Cowboys and Indians by dattaway · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would expect the incident report would refer to the "suspect" by his name, after all they have identified him, right? Instead, they make repeated comments to his skin color as if that has any bearing to the case.

      "He's not white, so he must be guilty your honor!"

      I'm "white," but I do like it when officers that are required to uphold the law know what are important facts from the details. Sometimes police scare me. That guy shouldn't have made it past the interviews for a "security guard," not to mention a police officer. Sounds racist to me if I have seen it.

    3. Re:Cowboys and Indians by ADRA · · Score: 2

      Actually, it is aboriginal, but who cares anyway, oh...

      --
      Bye!
    4. Re:Cowboys and Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they arrest any "darkies" too?

    5. Re:Cowboys and Indians by Hooptie · · Score: 1

      ITYM
      White Oppressors and Indigenous American Peoples

      THT, HAND.
      Hooptie

      --
      "Heavens, it appears that my weewee has been stricken with rigor mortis!" -- Stewie Griffin
    6. Re:Cowboys and Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may be required or encouraged to identify details such as race and gender, for use as evidence in case of additional factors such as racial discrimination.

      As always, IANAL

    7. Re:Cowboys and Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sounds racist to me if I have seen it."

      And you sound stupid and pompous to me.
      Thereby I deny you the right to do anything (including voting) that might affect MY future.
      Get lost fucking idiot - this country is full of stupidity as it is ..

    8. Re:Cowboys and Indians by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      I'm white, too. But southern police scare me a lot. It's kind of a shock to hear of someone described as anything other than suspect or perpetrator. Rod Hill, on the other hand, was called complainant Rod Hill (got to love the literacy rate among hick cops) and witness (General Manager) Rod Hill. Cherian was simply Indian male. I'm sorry, but unless you're here as a tourist or on a temporary visa, you're an American. Not Indian- American, Italian- American or Martian- American, but American. A lot more of an American than your average Dekalb County flatfoot.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    9. Re:Cowboys and Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're from South Carolina, right?

    10. Re:Cowboys and Indians by Romancer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How "American" can you get?

      The "Indians" were here first, and the only reason they weren't called "Americans" was because some white guy couldn't read a map or take a look around him to see that he wasn't in India.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    11. Re:Cowboys and Indians by toiletsalmon · · Score: 0

      [sarcasm]
      Let that be a lesson to all you Native Americans. All three of you! Any damn "injun" comming around trying to get "rep-ar-ations" of any kind in this here part of town will get his come uppance! Quicker n a jack rabbit humping a carrot hole come first of spring! Wheeeeee Doggies!

      Hey, maybe he really wanted that electronic stuff so he could build a bom...never mind...It's not even worth it anymore...
      [/sarcasm]

    12. Re:Cowboys and Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, in this case Indian American most certainly refers to a person who has his roots in India. His name suggests that he is from Kerala in south india.
      He's probably a second generation American

  4. Sigh. by juuri · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hill informed police that Abraham Cherian, an Indian American

    ... and what exactly does that last part matter for?

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
    1. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "trying to rip off the store, the same store that had conceded to give another customer his video card as requested 10 days earlier"

      To show the discriminatory practices. Dumbass.

    2. Re:Sigh. by KingKire64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you read further down on the page you will read this is a possible instance of descrimination

      I have attempted to call Mr. Hill all morning to ask what criteria must be met to actually have the original price honored. Do you have to be Male? Female? Black? White? Does it matter that the first person to get the correct price at this very same store was a White Male, and the person turned away today happened to be dark skinned of Indian Nationality?? Well, we won't know, because if you go into the store to ask...you will be ARRESTED.

      --
      "All I can tell the "lesser of two evils" folks is that if they keep voting for evil, they'll keep getting evil."-Lp.org
    3. Re:Sigh. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      michael informed Slashdot that Cutriss, insert a pointless racial segue here, was trying to submit a story, the same story that ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H ^H^H^H^H

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    4. Re:Sigh. by chadm1967 · · Score: 1

      I agree! Why does it matter that he's an Indian American?

    5. Re:Sigh. by God!+Awful · · Score: 1

      Hill informed police that Abraham Cherian, an Indian American

      ... and what exactly does that last part matter for?

      My thoughts exactly. All that did was make the author seem like a whining idiot with an axe to grind. And I wonder if the subsequent line was meant to subliminally convince us that there was racism afoot:

      Best Buy is now apparently red-flagging inquiring troublemakers

      -a
    6. Re:Sigh. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Because they gave the product to the white guys, and called the cops on the brown guy. That makes it pretty fucking relevant.

    7. Re:Sigh. by arkanes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having worked in retail, this actually sounds ALOT like someone who came into the store, got refused the price, and then proceeded to be really loud and annoying, probably refusing to leave, until the manager called the police. People who do this often throw down any sort of minority card they can. It's possible this is a genuine case of discrimination, of course, but purely from the quotes in the article it sounds more like an annoying, abrasive, disruptive customer.

    8. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I metamoderate... and I mark every troll and offtopic UNFAIR

      Yeah, well I Moderate. I'll be keeping an eye out for you, and soon, you won't be able to metamoderate

    9. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [snip] Upon my arrival, I spoke with complainant Rod Hill (General Manager) who stated that unknown indian male came in the store with a website generated receipt to purchase a $399 item for the price of $129.99. [/snip]

      hmm unknown = American?

    10. Re:Sigh. by m3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The guy who this happened to went into a little more detail on Kuro5hin about what happened. According to him he was never rude at all. He asked for the manager, and then was lead to a backroom to wait. He thought it was so that the other managers could confer with one another to see if they would honor the price match or not, but instead it was jsut to keep him from leaving the store until the cops came. I know I won't be stepping in a Best Buy in Tucker, Georgia anytime soon.

    11. Re:Sigh. by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      I won't be stepping into any Best Buy, anywhere, anytime soon.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    12. Re:Sigh. by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      and what exactly does that last part matter for?

      Very likely it matters for identification. "The guy in the blue shirt is the one that's causing the trouble, officer." "The Indian guy is causing the trouble, officer." If he's the only Indian or the only guy in a blue shirt, the police know who to grab and haul out.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    13. Re:Sigh. by Carbonite · · Score: 1

      It might be relevant if ALL the white guys got the product and ALL the brown guys got the cops called on them. This isn't the case here. Are you sure no minorities received the product? Did any other minorities get arrested?

      Stop the damn racism rhetoric for a minute! Best Buy is an equal oppurtunity scammer. Some people got lucky and received the product, many didn't. Be smart and don't shop there.

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    14. Re:Sigh. by agent0range_ · · Score: 1

      Would they even bother mentioning race if he were white?

      Hill informed police that Abraham Lincon, a White American...

      Likely not. I'm sure they could argue that it was not meant to be there to imply anything about the character of Mr. Cherian, but why state it at all?

    15. Re:Sigh. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      It's not just about Best Buy, it's about how he was treated at that Best Buy and why. I'm not one to go off about racism lightly, but it still exists, and is still a factor in society, your denial of that fact notwithstanding. And, in cases like this, racism doesn't have to be an explicit ideology or creed of racial superiority, but the fact that some (white) people will get the benefit of the doubt while others will be treated with suspicion from the outset.

    16. Re:Sigh. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Having worked in retail, this actually sounds ALOT like someone who came into the store, got refused the price, and then proceeded to be really loud and annoying, probably refusing to leave, until the manager called the police.
      Retailers are so used to think that they a **ENTITLED** to screw their customers scot-free; you have to rattle their cage once in a while. A friend of mine bought some porn videos from a porn store, and wanted to return one; when be bought it, the store clerk simply forgot to stamp the receipt with the "UNREFUNDABLE" stamp.

      When we showed-up, the first thing the clerk did was take the receipt and stamp it with the "UNREFUNDABLE" stamp. I immediately started to yell and shout that they were a bunch of fuckers to screw their customers like that. The store was full of customers. The manager came and I shouted at him how his employee was screwing us. He then shouted back at me and I just shouted louder.

      My friend, an oriental, could not believe I would be shouting like that in a store!!!

      The manager then told me to leave; when I said "NO", he threatened to call the cops, I then shouted back "fine, call the cops, and I'll show them how the fuck you are screwing your customers". Now, the customers were silently starting to go out of the store.

      Nothing like emptying the store of customers to scare a store manager shitless! He relented and finally refunded my friend for his pr0n movie. I then made sure to say very loudly "it's too bad that you have to shout to get decent service".

    17. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yeah what the hell?
      blatant racial profiling has started to become the norm of things these days.

  5. oh shit! by paradesign · · Score: 3, Funny

    now best buy will be dual /.ed. both their site and their stores!

    --
    I want 2D games back.
    1. Re:oh shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, this "^H" stuff isn't even funny. Why do people still do this? It's dumb.

  6. Nothing better to do? by rizzmanix · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Anyone that spends this much time and effort trying to get away with buying something for what was a pricing mistake is really troubled.

    1. Re:Nothing better to do? by Phoenix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If it were a typo, I'd have to agree with you. But quoting a "$200 savings" along with the listed price, which just happens to match the average pricewatch price on that card, isn't a typo.

      Besides, there is one other thing to consider here...people have PAID for the card at that price. Even if it were a honest typo, Best Buy (or any other company) is obliged to give the option to either use the money towards the proper purchase price, give a refund or give store credit. They only have rights to your money in exchange for goods or services rendered.

      After all how would you feel if you paid your hard earned money for something that you aren't getting and when you asked for your money, you were told to "sod off"? I don't know about you, but I'd be rather miffed

      --
      -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
    2. Re:Nothing better to do? by ADRA · · Score: 2

      I can imagine this being concidered only a typo if the $200 savings text was automatically generated from a backend server. If there is a database with the regular retail and the sale price, if the $200 came from subtracting one from the other, then it is just a typo.

      Now, how far does a typo go before it is a liability? If the web server sends bad bits? Yes it is a typo because it distributes the media, not the content, now does the database count as a content source or a media producer? If it was the former, I don't think I could concider the mis-pricing to be a typo. It would be a corporate goof, but not a typo.

      --
      Bye!
    3. Re:Nothing better to do? by talon77 · · Score: 1

      quoting a $200 savings isn't a typo? WHERE have you ever seen a geforce4-ti4600 for $339? if it was legit, it would be at LEAST 250 savings.. maybe even 300.

      This was an obvious mistake, and a bunch of criminals are taking screen shots of the mistake and trying to get something for nothing. Its BS.

    4. Re:Nothing better to do? by gdyas · · Score: 2

      Besides, there is one other thing to consider here...people have PAID for the card at that price. Even if it were a honest typo, Best Buy (or any other company) is obliged to give the option to either use the money towards the proper purchase price, give a refund or give store credit. They only have rights to your money in exchange for goods or services rendered.


      In fact, it's easy to argue that regardless of the price itself being a mistake initially, when Best Buy took the money for promising to ship the item, their action validated that price and bound them to complete their end of the bargain. They are bound to deliver the item, and if they choose not to or try to alter the terms of the sale, are in a highly actionable position under the law.

      --

      The only tool you've got against psychosis is experience.

    5. Re:Nothing better to do? by Phoenix · · Score: 1

      Where have I seen a GeForce4 TI 4600 for $339?

      www.pricewatch.com

      PNY brand, Micro-Pro Inc, $317 +12 S&H
      EVGA brand, Legend Micro, $323 +9-18 S&H
      Vision Tek, Comp-U-Plus, $339 +14.95 Second Day

      Need I go on?

      --
      -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
    6. Re:Nothing better to do? by Phoenix · · Score: 1

      Oh and by the way...

      The problem wan't only Best Buy not giving the card at that price, but Best buy not giving refunds of the money that was spent.

      So if Best Buy wasn't giving the card, nor was it giving the money back...who was the "bunch of criminals" that was "trying to get something for nothing" hmm?

      --
      -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
    7. Re:Nothing better to do? by axxter · · Score: 1

      Ok to start INAL but some points in support.

      Whether someone agrees to sell you something at the price they advertised or not is not illegal (at least under the law here and in most places with legal systems based on Britains). Not suplying goods payed for.

      As my father (AL) explained it to me a price is an invitation to enter into a sales contract, while the sale itself is (implicitly or explicitly) a contract. While advertising at a price you won't supply might get you in trouble with your industry body/consumer rights body/advertising authority it is not ilegal. Reusing to suply goods paid for is a breach of the sales contract and would be subject to damages just as any other breach of contract.

  7. Wow by mnemon1c · · Score: 1

    I worked for Best Buy for 5 and a half years. I have never heard of anything like this before. Best Buy should just suck it up and honor the price. It is their mistake. I have seen several customers arrested before, but not for asking for what is reightfully thiers!

    --
    Ah, the last peanut -- overflowing with the oil and salt of its departed brothers. -Homer
    1. Re:Wow by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I have seen several customers arrested before, but not for asking for what is reightfully [sic] thiers [sic]!

      They've had customers arrested for comparison shopping.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    2. Re:Wow by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wow, that's a scary story!

      I worked for BestBuy for about 60 days many years ago, and was told on a Saturday evening to be sure to bring a white shirt to work on Sunday.

      Sunday morning I was given a micro-cassette recorder and was told to change into the white shirt and head off to a local competitor (H.H. Gregg's) to record all the prices on equipment that we sold at BestBuy as well.

      Then when I got back, I had to fill out a form of all the items I had seen, compare our prices to their prices, and if necessary print up new signs with prices that matched our competitor.

      Kind of sad that they would arrest someone for doing something that they pay their employees to do!

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Excuse me for posting as an AC. but I already modded some and do not want those points to be wasted.

      Here is the follow-up on the Bets Buy comparative shopping story. Mr. Kahlow sued and lost. Not sure if he appealed the verdict or not. And anyone knows if Best Buy's policy regarding comparative shooping has been changed or not?

      Annamite

    4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The store in my town had the display, with the 129 price tag, and no units.

      they sold out before they realized what was wrong, evidently.

    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      K-Mart does this.

      Wal-Mart does this.

      Every major retail chain does this.

      they don't let you record prices so you can't be competitive, but they record your prices to be competitive. They know you may get in trouble, they don't care.

      And you would only get arrested if you refused to leave. If you refuse to leave, when asked, you are guilty of tresspass, and should be prosecuted for it. You have no right to be in a store, it is private property.

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope BB does this crap all the time. I worked for them for 4 1/2 years. They wouldn't give a penny to someone getting screwed for the longest time. Even more so on the service center side where peoples laptops would get damaged and they would not compensate. BB is the evil of all evils of retail. Did you know they have a "Allaince" with MS? Yep in fact MS bought a ton of their stock when they signed the deal..

      Idea Box is the devil.

    7. Re:Wow by anjrober · · Score: 1

      i'm stunned by this. just yesterday I was in BB buying a TV and recording tons of info on my iPaq. The response of the clerk to me recording info on my iPaq was, "wow, that's one of the new ones." This lead to a classic geekfest conversation. My girlfriend got bored and started looking at CDs when we started talking about ST vs. BattleStar Galactica (who was more annoying Wesley or the fluffy robot dog). I wonder, was it really BB saying you can't do this or that or was it this guy being an ass. BB store officials might be jerks but most of the people working there are semi-geeky kids. I'm still completely stunned that BB would try and prevent me from recording prices. If they actually tried to stop me, I think I might have to be arrested as well. WTF.

    8. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His court loss doesn't excuse their sleaziness.

    9. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And you would only get arrested if you refused to leave. If you refuse to leave, when asked, you are guilty of tresspass, and should be prosecuted for it. You have no right to be in a store, it is private property.

      In that case, perhaps managers should just politely ask anyone who they think can't pay for items to leave? Or perhaps managers who don't like Indian Americans should be allowed to ask them to leave, selectively?

      That's why BY LAW you have to put policies like this up on a sign. Otherwise its discrimination and ILLEGAL.

      Cheerio.

    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you would only get arrested if you refused to leave. If you refuse to leave, when asked, you are guilty of tresspass, and should be prosecuted for it. You have no right to be in a store, it is private property.

      Ah, trespassing! Racists use the same kind of logic to justify keeping out black people from their stores. How one could be guilty of trespass in semi-public place never ceases to amaze me. Just because they ask you to leave doesn't mean you should be punished for refusing. There has to be more reason than that to warrant conviction.

    11. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Home Depot does this, we have a guy for our store that one of his jobs is to go across the street to record prices at Lowe's, BB arresting people for that is gay

  8. My legal-sense is tingling! by cliffy2000 · · Score: 1

    Alright. I see two lawsuits here:
    #1) Class-action lawsuit against Best Buy for fraud and misleading the consumer. Compensatory damages for monies lost. Sounds fair.
    #2) False imprisonment! There seems to be grounds for a suit here. And there's of course, the whole racial bias thing going on. Which is 'orrible as is. I see damages for emotional distress. It'd be quickly settled with the right firm... maybe in the range of 200... considering its high profile.

    1. Re:My legal-sense is tingling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racial bias? Just because someone is a minority does not make every wrong done against them racial bias. When we wake the fuck up and realize that, then we can move on with improving race relations in the US.

    2. Re:My legal-sense is tingling! by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but no on #2. Technically, best buy isn't imprisoning anyone (although that would be kind of neat).

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    3. Re:My legal-sense is tingling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as they asked him to leave, and he refused, he was guilty of criminal trespass, regardless of what the store was guilty of.

      If I steal your wallet, and you see it on my table through the window, this does not give you the right to break into my house. You need to get a police man, tell them about it, and hopefully it is still in plain view when you return with the police officer.

      He wasn't falsely imprisoned. I think a judge would probably not convict, but that is why we have court systems. The police aren't there to determine the subtelties of the case or extenuating circumstances, judges and juries are.

    4. Re:My legal-sense is tingling! by amuro98 · · Score: 2

      Problem is, the legal system tends to assume you're guilty until proven innocent if accused of certain things. Being racist is one of them.

      Yes, the race card is a cheap way to put another zero on your settlement, but it's proven to be effective. I fully expect the guy to take Best Buy *and* the police to court for harrassment, false arrest because he's [fill in ethnicity here.]

      It is then on Best Buy to prove that they haven't treated him any differentally than other customers (but have they had any Whites arrested?)

      And you know as soon as someone starts calling for various ethnic groups to boycott Best Buy due to their racist treatment, things are REALLY going to get bad for Best Buy...

    5. Re:My legal-sense is tingling! by rworne · · Score: 1
      Just as an interesting side-note. Regardless on who is at fault here:

      The manager of the store gave a description of the customer to the police (sounds reasonable to me for someone in the manager's position). Additionally, the quotes you are seeing about "Indian-American"s are from the police report, and if you read the thread about this on [H]ardOCP, you will find out that the arresting officers were both African-American.

      Just thought I'd point that out, since there are wild accusations flying around here about another WASP conspiracy.

      As a disclaimer, I am also one of the 2000 affected by this pricing issue. But I don't whine about it.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    6. Re:My legal-sense is tingling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh goodie, another sue-happy loser....
      Just what this country needs....

    7. Re:My legal-sense is tingling! by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      It is then on Best Buy to prove that they haven't treated him any differentally than other customers (but have they had any Whites arrested?)

      Ah, but they did treat him differently then other customers. Ten days earlier, that same store chose to honor the same price to another customer. I hope Rod Hill liked owning his own house.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    8. Re:My legal-sense is tingling! by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >I hope Rod Hill liked owning his own house.

      Even if Cherian sues and LOSES, Hill might be out
      cold.

      Wonder if Rod even knows how famous (infamous?)
      he has just become?

      The way I see it, Cherian doesn't even have to sue. The State of Georgia should prosecute Hill. He shouldn't have lied to the police. Period. Who does he think he is, Bill Clinton?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  9. Sickening by sc_demandred · · Score: 2, Funny

    It wasn't enough that we killed their children, stole their land, gave them diseases, slaughtered their food sources, raped their women, and destroyed their once-proud culture, now we won't even let them play Medal of Honor.

    --

    The hooligans are loose! The hooligans are loose! What if they become ruffians? -- Bill Hicks

    1. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we", "them"/"their"?

      yeah. Get over it, it was 500 years ago.

      S

    2. Re:Sickening by Peyna · · Score: 2

      An 'Indian American' would be a United States Citizen/Otherwise who is from India. You're thinking of so-called 'Native Americans', who may or may not be the original inhabitants of the land which we call America. I believe there have been many remains found which do not show connection to 'Native Americans' and predate all 'Native American' bones, etc. that have been found. This leads me to believe that they were't necessarily the first either.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A native is someone who is born there. So "Native Americans" is accurate for them even if they weren't the first to be there. Anyone born in America could technically be called Native American, in fact... but that's another story.

    4. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When most people say 'Native American' they are referring to the supposed fact that they were the native inhabitants of the land. I don't believe 'American Indian' to be an accurate title either, since they weren't really Indians. I guess I need to ask someone of that decent what they prefer to be called, if anything at all.

      Another interesting thing: some evidence shows that they are descendents of people from India. I guess that would make them Indians after all! =]

    5. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never killed any children, stole anyone's land, slaughtered anyone's recources, raped any women or destroyed any culture. Maybe you have but don't talk for me you unfunny stupid fuck.

    6. Re:Sickening by darnellmc · · Score: 1

      Interesting, celebrate the supposed discovery of the land for over 500 years and even call it a Holiday, but when confronted with how the land was STOLEN, the response is "get over it". Spoken like a true coward!

    7. Re:Sickening by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      The real difference here is that they completely killed off their precursors. The Europeans (ie. "whitey") only killed of a bunch of them and stole their land, etc.

    8. Re:Sickening by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Any remains found that predate the European arrivals would be considered "Native Americans" by the accepted definition of the term. You can only question if the remains belonged to a specific tribe/ethnic group, i.e. "These bones are the remains of a Puyallup."

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    9. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its called tough s**t All the land in the world was taken from somebody at one time or another.

      Tree Hugging hippies never did anything accept provide decient pot.

    10. Re:Sickening by mr.+roboto · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apu: Today, I am no longer an Indian living in America. I am an Indian-American.
      Lisa: You know, in a way, all Americans are immigrants. Except, of course Native Americans.
      Homer: Yeah, Native Americans like us.
      Lisa: No, I mean American Indians.
      Apu: Like me.

    11. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What proof do you have they completely killed off their precursors? If they were the first groups to arrive there wasn't anyone to kill off nor has there been ANY evidence to the contrary.

      Stick to the facts

    12. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No person formed with the Earth jackass. Land has been owned by many groups, countries, people over thousands of years. The groups of people that the Europeans took the land from 500 years ago fought wars amongst themselves for land as well. Do you think they were all smiling and hugging bunny rabbits before the dreaded white man landed? Grow up.

    13. Re:Sickening by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      In the western US there have been a number of archeological sites showing that the Native Americans did indeed have precursors who lived in the area prior to them. Different cultures, different physiological characteristics, the whole works. Look it up.

    14. Re:Sickening by demonbug · · Score: 1

      ummm.... I think you are thinking of Native Americans. An Indian American would be someone from India, in which case it wasn't US that did all that, it was those stinking Brits...

    15. Re:Sickening by nexex · · Score: 1

      thank god we have the PC patrol were ever we go. we wouldnt want to offend anyone now would we? Im not white, Im European-Amerian. I find being called white is a racist label...

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
    16. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Aztecs slaughtering of rival tribes is legendary.

    17. Re:Sickening by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      who is "we"? i didnt do shit

    18. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being part cherokee I have to say "get over it". It's done and that's that. There are more important things to worry about than crimes from both sides over a century ago.

    19. Re:Sickening by damipoo · · Score: 1

      What twisted sense of humour could rate your comment +4?

      Although I personally consider your comment to be funny... I think it is really inapropriate.

    20. Re:Sickening by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      So-called 'native americans' are also immigrants. All depends on how far your willing to dig back into history.

    21. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      After they sold "us" said land, then decided that no one owned it to be sold, so they still had rights to it... i.e. defrauded "us".

      After they attacked settlements on "their" land, that they sold "us" (see above).

      After they raped, tortued, kidnapped, and otherwise terrorized "our" families.

      It was an ugly time, and no one is perfect, no one is the good guy. "They" just lost the ugly fight.

    22. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, prove to me which way the footprints on the "bearing strait" went. Nobody has proven anything. Native Americans are the original peoples, the FIRST peoples of what is now called "America". If you weren't among the first, you are an immigrant. You are an immigrant if someone was already living in the space once you got there.

    23. Re:Sickening by darnellmc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If you are cherokee can you say "Dawes Act"? Your people are due millions, possibly a billion plus and there are legal battles going on right now over this.

      Native Americans were suppose to be receiving royalties for land for many years and did not receive a dime. And it all relates back to what happend 500 years ago.

      Don't beleive me? Check out this page and see on the lower right side of the page where a caption says "LONG OVERDUE? Will Uncle Sam pay billions to Native Americans", you can see the video for yourself.

      Seems that the government would have loved for you to get over this ;o) .

    24. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must have smoked away your spelling areas too

    25. Re:Sickening by micq · · Score: 1
      It wasn't enough that we killed their children, stole their land, gave them diseases, slaughtered their food sources, raped their women, and destroyed their once-proud culture, now we won't even let them play Medal of Honor.

      I'm not sure what you were trying to say, but I wasn't around for any of that, and I doubt you were either... Kind of like saying we enslaved the blacks, taking their freedom... I wasn't there for that, either.

    26. Re:Sickening by mdw2 · · Score: 1

      Yep, and after we got done doing that, we trudged back across the middle east, the baltics, eastern and western europe, and the atlantic ocean, to come back here and do the same thing to the natives of north america, man we were busy.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    27. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm .. should we charge every fucking non-white person for all the discoveries and advancements in medicine and standards of living we made available to everyone ?

    28. Re:Sickening by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wasn't around when my employer merged with another company and then liquidated their assets, but I have no difficulties saying "we" did it. There's an institutional "we" by which institutions and organizations can accumulate liabilities and responsibility even though all the individuals involved have changed over.

    29. Re:Sickening by winse · · Score: 1

      Interestingly that is the sentiment that should be shared by the world. When one speaks of someone elses grandmother doing wrong to an ancestor I believe you have nearly the proper response....the completion of the sentiment would be toward those who instill hate in the next generation "No one did sh@# to me"

      --
      this sig is deprecated
    30. Re:Sickening by Peyna · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      It's more cultural sensitivity than politically correctness. United Statesians tend to forget the rest of the world exists, and most of it did so long before the United States. It is important to recognize cultural differences and to respect them.

      I consider myself a citizen of the United States of America. I have ancestors from Europe, but I am not a 'European-American' anymore than anyone is an Indian-American or African-American. I am as American as a Canadian and Mexican and Brazilian.

      Besides, we're all human in the end, (unless we're non-human animals). My point is that labels such as these are pointless and only lead to more bigotry and hatred as they tend to create divides. Yes it is important to recognize where you came from and your ancestors, but it is more important to realize that your ancestors, where they lived, and their ancestors are NOT what defines you. You are what defines you. Ethnical classifications are becoming more and more moot anyway, due to extensive interbreeding, etc. I for one, wish that the need to even keep track of ethnicity on any form would be done away with all together.

      --
      What?
    31. Re:Sickening by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      a number of archeological sites showing that the Native Americans did indeed have precursors who lived in the area prior to them.

      Yeah right. Then where are their casinos?

    32. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, we're all human in the end, (unless we're non-human animals). My point is that labels such as these are pointless and only lead to more bigotry and hatred as they tend to create divides.

      Your heart believes...

      United Statesians tend to forget the rest of the world exists, and most of it did so long before the United States.

      but your mind does not.

      Don't worry your mind will always follow your heart.

      Or is it the other way around?

    33. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as a non-white, SURE!

      Gimme!Gimme!Gimme!

    34. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "who is "we"? i didnt do shit"

      Yeah. It's not "we" when there's something to be shameful about. But it becomes "we" when there's something to get out of it.

      People fucking suck! (Myself included.)

    35. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who is "we"? i didnt do shit

      Keep it up and you'll be a wealthy man.

    36. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born here. That makes me a bonafide non-immigrant.

    37. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't enough that we killed their children, stole their land, gave them diseases, slaughtered their food sources, raped their women, and destroyed their once-proud culture, now we won't even let them play Medal of Honor.

      Yes, we do get re-runs of sick Hollywood movies out here in India (to explain the diseases and the children part), but trust me, the food sources are just as fine. Tandoori chicken still rocks!
    38. Re:Sickening by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      "Kennewick Man" would challenge your assumption.

    39. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      United Statesians tend to forget the rest of the world exists, and most of it did so long before the United States.


      You are clearly a total fucking idiot.
    40. Re:Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right! There is no segregation in the USA, and Amerindians certainly aren't festooned in reservations of otherwise barren land with no access to these "advancements"! Way to go, Whitey Whiterson!

    41. Re:Sickening by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      Well shit. If the fact that you didn't get modded up 'Funny' doesn't demonstrate that the mods on /. are screwed, I don't know what would prove that.

    42. Re:Sickening by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Well shit. If the fact that you didn't get modded up 'Funny' doesn't demonstrate that the mods on /. are screwed, I don't know what would prove that.

      :-)

  10. Are you sure? by Bob+Zer+Fish · · Score: 1

    In the UK, at least, there are little pieces of text which say 'E&OE.', which means that even if the advert is wrong, they don't have to sell it at that price. As soon as you agree a price, then it is (afaik) a legally binding contract. For this reason, if they advertise something at a price, they don't necessarly have to honour the price, although most bigger companies will. I was wondering about what would happen if they took the money from your bank account, and then told you that the product was now unavailable for resale. Then, they gave the money back (i.e. refund).I would have thought that this was breach of contract, and hence you could take legal action. However, is legal action really worth it? Legal expenses alone will probably out-weigh the money you might gain. I would have thought that the copany could refuse to sell the products though. (esp. in UK). I'm not confident with US law though. Ny experts? (I'm sure most US magazines will tell you your rights)

    1. Re:Are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errors and Ommisions Exempt

      For any non UK people who dont know what E&OE stands for.

    2. Re:Are you sure? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      IANAL, so I can't provide any insight on laws regarding what the company is allowed to do, but I can tell you that, in the US, legal action may be worth it because of the class action lawsuit, which allows legal costs to be shared by all the parties claiming damages. Spread legal costs over about 1000 or more people, and it becomes trivial. Besides, sometimes things like this are worth fighting for (even at expense) because they prevent other companies from doing the same thing in the future.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    3. Re:Are you sure? by Shambhu · · Score: 1

      E&OE doesn't have anything to do with whether they have to sell at an advertised price or not. It's merely a statement limiting their liability in general : Equity and Owner's Equity. You'll have to ask a lawyer or an accountant for a better explanation.

      -S

      --
      Rome wasn't bilked in a day.
    4. Re:Are you sure? by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2

      hmmm.. i thought it meant "Errors & Omissions Excepting".

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  11. IANAL yada yada... by GutBomb · · Score: 1

    Best Buy Did have a disclaimer. Also I am sure the message boards at anandtech have kept the messages from when this first happened. There were a deluge of "lets go for it, and when they don't honor the price, sue thier pants off"

    when people go in with that intent, it will not stand up in court.

  12. Now is a good time to boycott Best Buy... by Maddog_Delphi97 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It seems that since Best Buy is essentially a racist corporation bent on squeezing profits using unethical bait-and-switch tactics, we must respond by boycotting Best Buy.

    I also remember somewhere Microsoft owns about ten percent of Best Buy... can anyone confirm or deny this?

    1. Re:Now is a good time to boycott Best Buy... by macrom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If anything, I would say the author's reference that the man was an Indian American is racist. Why does it matter? We don't know how this guy was carrying on -- he could have threatened to destroy stuff in the store, threatened the manager and/or store associates. Hell, he could have even been approaching customers in an attempt to turn them away. All of these things could get you arrested at a store in America regardless of the country you were born in.

      If you're gonna boycott Best Buy, do it because of something more legitimate than an article claiming the arrest of this guy is racist.

    2. Re:Now is a good time to boycott Best Buy... by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      If you look at the links, the police report repeatedly mentions he is Indian. This is probably why the poster mentioned it as well.

  13. Well . . by G00F · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is about $200+ difference, not to mention, if they say it is 129, then that is what they sell it as. No false advertising you know.

    Best buy has done stuff like this before, where they accidently show on the website a monorot for like 150$, and they fix the error when it comes to billing the customers credit card.

    So now, it seams both sides are being a little more aggressive. And yes, I would be one of them had I seen that card going for that cheap.

    --
    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    1. Re:Well . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      First off, Best Buy labeled the $129 price as being $200 off of the original price which seemed reasonable. They also DID NOT fix the pricing error before credit cards were charged. Several of my friends that got in on this had their cards charged. Not just authorized, but charged. It wasn't until about a week and a half went by that they got their money back and an email from Best Buy.

  14. Hahaha, what a fucking blunder by soybean · · Score: 1

    They're going to hell for this one. Back in the day of the bubble, they would be paying people to buy these cards, now they are arresting people for buying the cards at the advertized price.

    1. Re:Hahaha, what a fucking blunder by slide-rule · · Score: 1, Funny
      OT, but in response to your signature line:
      Fuck off spelling fascists. Get off my internet. I have no patience for you. Is spelling the only thing you know?

      We know grammar too. You need either a comma or a hyphen in your first sentence. Lemme suggest either:

      Fuck off, spelling fascists. . .

      or

      Fuck off-spelling fascists. . .

      depending on what you meant. (Sorry, man, but opportunity presented itself. ;)

    2. Re:Hahaha, what a fucking blunder by soybean · · Score: 1

      No, it's ok. I actually don't mind grammer pointers. People don't get that compulsive about grammer like they do about spelling. It's just the folks that are obsesed spelling that piss me off.

  15. What's even more disturbing... by Deltan · · Score: 5, Informative

    They seem to do this intentionally. This isn't the first time Best Buy has misguided customers on its website. They purposely mark a product with the wrong price to get everyone's pre-order dollars and then don't ship it and call it a "typo". They then proceed to either refund you or give you a "discounted price" for their "mistake" which is no where near the original price advertised on their website.

    It is some kind of cheap ploy to get people to use their website for all of their purchases. This is all to common with e-tailers these days. I for one sincerely hope that Steve and Hypothermia take Best Buy to the cleaners over this one.

    1. Re:What's even more disturbing... by Dick+Click · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am interested in your suggestion that Best Buy does this on purpose. I have not heard of any other dimilar cases involving Best Buy. Incidentally, the practice of the "door crasher" special is common in the retail electronics industry, buy typically, on an ad, somewhere in small print are the words "first 10 customers". I find this somewhat underhanded and sneaky too.

    2. Re:What's even more disturbing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They seem to do this intentionally. This isn't the first time Best Buy has misguided customers on its website. They purposely mark a product with the wrong price to get everyone's pre-order dollars and then don't ship it and call it a "typo".

      I wonder if this happens more frequently around the end of their fiscal quarters. It could be a way of increasing booked revenue for a quarter to make the results seem better.

      Of course, this is essentially a Ponzi scheme where they have to keep this up every quarter thereafter or their results will suddenly drop because they won't have anything to offset the returns.

    3. Re:What's even more disturbing... by Deltan · · Score: 2

      Check out Steve's article. I think he makes reference to this not being the first time.

      Also, if you have time on your hands, HardOCP brings its users the best bang for the buck deals on its page. More often than not, these end up being typos and are more than happy to get the referred traffic from Kyle at HardOCP. Not only best buy but other online computer e-tailers. Thank god for reseller ratings. It's a shame the search function doesn't work on his site. I'm too lazy to browse through his archives either. But.. it's all there.

    4. Re:What's even more disturbing... by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Yes but it's not good business practice in the long run to make all your customers angry with you so I really doubt they're doing this deliberately as a long-term strategy. As to their explanation that it's a "typo" - why don't you believe them. I've seen spelling and grammatical errors in "professionally designed webpages" by people who should know better than to proof read their pages first! The odd error is to be expected now and then as it's people inputting the data and they tend to make mistakes.

    5. Re:What's even more disturbing... by Deltan · · Score: 2

      If you read the Hypothermia article. He said he called -twice- and confirmed the price over the phone. Then they reject it?

      Once is a typo, twice is a fluke, three times is intentional.

    6. Re:What's even more disturbing... by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      it's called "bait and switch", and it's no different that a gas station with sign's that say $.59/gal, and then tell you it's $1.59 when you're done. They can't force you to pay the higher price, and they have to change the advertised price when notified of the mistake.

    7. Re:What's even more disturbing... by dimator · · Score: 1

      it's called "bait and switch"

      I remember on Growing Pains, Mike Seaver was doing that at his first job, and his dad got pretty upset with him.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    8. Re:What's even more disturbing... by enjo13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing is, the data-entry mistake could have occured higher up the chain. The people that they called simply have access to the price listed in the best buy system.

      So... if the typo occured when the price was actually listed, then you could call the customer reps 600 times and they would all give you the same price.

      What is more interesting to me is that this did seem like some kind of specially designed promotion. I don't know if the 200 dollar off quote is something that is generated by their pricing system (its not uncommon for the suggested retail price and the offering price to be compared and presented to the reps for sale purposes) or if it was part of a really botched promotional campaign that best buy realized was a big mistake, just to late. That to me is the meat of the question.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    9. Re:What's even more disturbing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They pull that shit in Tennessee, the AG will have their ass. They fine the hell out of companies left and right for that. I didn't get my toy for the cheap price but the company lost *WAY* more than the price difference and the ahole manager got fired.

    10. Re:What's even more disturbing... by ekidder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I once tried to buy a digital camera from Best Buy. I was spending decently phat l00t for it -- something like $850. When I placed my order, they swore before Man and God that it would be at my doorstep in a week.
      Two weeks later, I called them. They apologized profusely, but it seemed they were out of stock and it was backordered. I told them to cancel my order and I would get it somewhere else. They refused because they could not cancel an order that was on backorder.
      I said 'Fine' and told them that my credit card company (AmEx) would be informed, along with the Better Business Bureau, and possibly the FTC if I could find a relevant statute.
      My order found itself canceled. I ordered the camera directly from Casio and got it in two days.
      Bastards.

    11. Re:What's even more disturbing... by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      Well, it's not quite the same situation here. He hadn't yet received the product. I dunno if that makes a legal difference, but it's one thing to cancel a deal and another to change the terms thereof and force the customer to accept the new ones.

      Regardless, I hope Best Buy pays through the nose for this one.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    12. Re:What's even more disturbing... by VFVTHUNTER · · Score: 2

      No no no.

      Once is happenstance.
      Twice is coincidence.
      Three times is enemy action.

    13. Re:What's even more disturbing... by Romancer · · Score: 1

      Compaq has just pulled this bait and switch to get business:


      Two weeks ago (Friday April 12 2002) compaq offered the Viewsonic 19" LCD monitor VG191 for a sale price of $805 after a 20% weeklong promotional coupon on their monitor selection.

      Compaq is now weaseling out of LCD monitor orders: Everyone who ordered a Viewsonic VG191 19" LCD flatpanel monitor for $805 from Compaq.com two weeks ago will have their orders cancelled. Compaq decided not to fulfill anyone's order at that price, claiming that the product was unavailable even though viewsponics replacement model is still available for purchase on their website for $350 more ($280 more after 20% discount). They are attempting to pull a classic bait-and-switch, encouraging people to purchase the newer more expensive model at full price.


      I do NOT want this to become common practice, please complain if something like this happens to you, all of will suffer if we let this become an acceptable business practice.

      "Encouraging" link text quoted below, in case linked site removes page:

      "

      From: Compaq.com
      Sent: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:26:30 -0500
      Subject: Compaq Order

      Dear {removed},

      We really appreciate your order that was placed on 4/12/2002.

      However, we regret that the VG191B is indefinitely not available. We
      would like to fulfill your order with the Viewsonic VX900, which is a
      new model of the Viewsonic 19" LCD family. We will honor the price of
      $999.99, however the 20% discount is not applicable to this order.

      The VX900 is a two tone, silver and black monitor with identical
      specifications, it has the same SuperClear MVA technology with
      OptiSynch Analog/Digital capability. The VX900 has in addition
      multimedia capability with 2 x 3 watts speakers with a microphone.
      Attached is a document, which compares the two monitors and/or spec
      sheets

      I understand your current selection is your first choice. The
      following options are available to you:

      Change your selection, or

      Cancel your order.

      Unless we hear from you by April 26, 2002, federal
      regulations require that your order be cancelled, as Compaq will be
      unable to ship your order as entered.

      Please feel free to contact me via email if you wish to make a change
      which may assist in the processing of your order. Thank you for
      choosing Compaq for your technology needs.

      Sincerely,

      {name removed}
      NAOPS

      Your Account ID is {removed}
      Check this order's status at the Compaq.com website:
      www.smb.compaq.com

      Select Order Status

      "

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  16. oh really? by Rombuu · · Score: 1, Troll

    FWIW, if the description of what happened is accurate, Best Buy has entered into a binding contract to sell the cards at the advertised price, and if they don't want to honor it, the people affected should take them to court (or contact their local Attorney General's office, which is what they appear to be doing). It's Best Buy's obligation to make sure their prices are accurate.

    Oh yeah? What state did you pass the bar in again?

    I read this whole thing and it was obviousy a typographical error and these people are trying to get something for nothing. Best Buy should have continued to tell them all to get stuffed.

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
    1. Re:oh really? by hendridm · · Score: 0, Troll

      Agreed. And what fool is going to go to court for $130 anyway?

      Nice try, cheapskates, but everyone makes mistakes.

      And regarding the "Worst Buy" headline. Granted, their store isn't the best store in the world, but in many communities it's the only store of its kind.

    2. Re:oh really? by Viking+Coder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When does this cross the line to bait-and-switch, which is illegal?

      I think it's a pretty fine line, not a blatant misunderstanding on the part of the poster. Don't be so critical - there's a real issue at stake, here.

      Or, to sum up Best Buy's mistake in Fortune Cookie wisdom :

      Measure twice, cut once.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    3. Re:oh really? by Loraque · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The only part that makes this stink is how the website was actually touting the $200 savings. THAT, to a reasonable person, would imply that they knew the card was worth at least $329, which is still a good price for it currently.

      I really don't know where people get this "Advertised price = binding contract" crap. It never was and never will be. What you DO get, is customer dis-satisfaction by making "mistakes" like this. That does indeed have a price tag attached, and the company would have to evaluate the financial impact of that dis-satisfaction against paying out for the pre-orders.

      I think BB may have underestimated the internet (shock) on this issue. Factor in some store managers caving in, and now they have a huge problem.

      They should have just kept up the stonewall from the beginning, and it would have been no different than errors in their print ads. Now that they have caved a little, they probably need to go all the way.

    4. Re:oh really? by scottdj · · Score: 4, Informative
      I suggest you re-read the hypothermia web page. The wording of the original Best Buy offer on the Best Buy web site made it very clear that this was an intentional pricing sale, not a typo.

      In case you missed it, here is the quote from hypothermia about the original web offer:

      Here's a strange one... we found an Advertisement at BestBuy.com yesterday that proclaimed "VisionTek GeForce4 Ti4600 for Special Pre-Order Price of $129.00..the savings is a $200.00 Value". Normally a "typo" or mistake would be something to the effect of a misplaced decimal point or an accidental wrong price. It usually doesn't consist of adding terms like Special Pre-Order Price and savings is a $200.00 Value, ( since it sounds reasonable $129.00 + $200.00 savings for a card announced that day with no real set price yet ) all over the advertisement. So we did the right thing and CALLED. BestBuy.com confirmed the price of $129.00 twice, at which time they gave us the $200.00 value / saving quotes.

      --
      Type something, will you? We're paying for this stuff!
    5. Re:oh really? by TimButterfield · · Score: 1

      If I understand this correctly, here are a couple of rough analogies:

      1) You buy a vehicle, sign the papers, start the loan and then get told you have pay more before taking delivery.

      2) You go through a store checkout, pay for your items, get your receipt and then have to pay more to leave the store.

      IANAL, yada, yada, but...

      It is one thing to have a typo and not sell based on the quoted price. It is quite another to sell based on a price and then, after the completing the sale (i.e., collecting the purchase price money), claim the price was not correct and that more is required. While the former may be a legitimate mistake, the later appears to be fraud.

    6. Re:oh really? by Phanatic1a · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're on crack.

      If the price read "129.99" instead of "329.99," that's a typo.

      "SPECIAL PRE-ORDER! 129.99 $200 SAVINGS!!" is most obviously not a typo.

      In addition, if it's a typo, then you don't honor it. You don't honor it for some people, turn other people away, and have other people arrested for trying to get what they ordered at the price they ordered it at.

      I used to work at Incredible Universe, an electronics store where the television department alone was roughly the size of a Best Buy. All the ones that made money were bought out by Fry's, and I was at one of the ones that made money. The way it was always explained to me was that we actually weren't responsible for the physical price tags on the items on the self; people could switch those, alter those, and so forth. We also weren't responsible for misprints or out-of-stocks on the newspaper ads; the ads are run for the whole country, and so long as one of the stores has the item in stock, it's a legal ad and not bait-and-switch. Misprints, of course, are the responsibility of the printer.

      So people'd buy an item, take it to the register, and the clerk'd scan the UPC. We were responsible for the price the item scans at the register, and if it was wrong, tough titty, we'd have to sell it anyway. We'd change the price in the system pretty damned fast, but we'd at least have to sell it to that guy.

    7. Re:oh really? by Matey-O · · Score: 2
      Measure twice, cut once.
      Swear like a sailor.
      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    8. Re:oh really? by dschuetz · · Score: 2

      I read this whole thing and it was obviousy a typographical error and these people are trying to get something for nothing.

      Most times, if there's a typo (like in a flyer), they'll put a sign at the door to the store, alerting customers to the typo. But I suspect that the first X people who get through before they detect the typo get a good deal. I think (but am not sure) that law generally states, essentially, that the price on the item is the price you have to honor, even if it ends up being grossly wrong. By posting a notice in the store, they're changing the flyer, and correcting the error.

      Furthermore, from the web page referenced here, it doesn't seem like it's a typo. If the ad said "$129, regularly $399, save $20", then it might be arguable that the price was supposed to be $379. But it was "$129, reg $399, save $200", so the math actually worked out. It's possible, maybe, that someone misread a memo saying "knock $20 off the price" as "knock $200 off the price," and then everything got FUBAR at that point as they updated the ad and db to match their reading of the memo. But, as I said before, I think the first few people to get in before the error is caught could be given the opportunity to be, well, lucky.

      And, personally, if I were at a store and something like this happened to me, how I respond would depend entirely on how I'd been treated at that store on other occasions. If they've treated me well, answered my questions, given me good service, etc., then I'd be perfectly happy to agree with them that "oops, wow, that's a doosy, okay, I won't buy it then." But, if they're jerks, with bad stocking practices, harrassment at the door when you leave (like they always ask for your receipt when you go out), etc., then, dammit, I'm looking out for myself just as they're looking out for themselves. They wouldn't alert me to an error in their favor, so why should I alert them to an error in mine?

      But, yes, though IJAG (I'm just a geek -- let's all drop the IANALs already! :) ), it seems to me that the poster is right. By accepting a credit card at the advertised price, and by actually charging the card and printing out a receipt, they're bound to give you the item. The receipt proves that, at this instant in time, you actually, legally OWN the piece of merchandise in question. They just have to grab it for you from the stockroom.

      Or something like that.

      (me, I avoid Best Buy entirely by shopping at Circuit City and Amazon.)

    9. Re:oh really? by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1
      Measure with a micrometer...

      Mark with chalk...

      Cut with an axe...

    10. Re:oh really? by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      And regarding the "Worst Buy" headline. Granted, their store isn't the best store in the world, but in many communities it's the only store of its kind.

      That doesn't mean it's not the worst buy. In fact, it guarantees it.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    11. Re:oh really? by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      It might be a typo if the online catalog was automatically generated, and the $200-off was activated by a checkbox. I don't use BestBuy, but some online sites do sometimes have identical discounts on multiple items...

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    12. Re:oh really? by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      "SPECIAL PRE-ORDER! 129.99 $200 SAVINGS!!" is most obviously not a typo.

      It makes it harder to swallow, but it is still concievable that it was a data entry typo. If the prices on the flyer/website were driven from a database, including a "$SAVINGS = $PRICE - $SALEPRICE" calculation, a single typo on the sale price could be the root cause.

    13. Re:oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or as I was always quoted when I was growing up "Zweimal schnitt, noch zu kurz." (Twice cut, still too short).

    14. Re:oh really? by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      Have you ever ordered anything online? With all the orders I've placed, I've never gotten the receipt at the time of the sale, it always came with the item. And they should never charge the card until they're ready to ship. You don't own squat just because you've placed an order. And an order confirmation is not a receipt. I think the receipts he is showing on the websites are from people who went to the store and got BB to pricematch.

    15. Re:oh really? by Rombuu · · Score: 1

      SPECIAL PRE-ORDER! 129.99 $200 SAVINGS!!" is most obviously not a typo

      So you really think they meant to sell these things for a rediculously low price? If so, why weren't they happy about these people trying to buy them?

      --

      DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
    16. Re:oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what's a really good idea? Reading the article before posting. When the website blatantly screams "$200 savings" at you, it's probably not a typo.

    17. Re:oh really? by fuzzydonkey · · Score: 1

      Steve Lynch called Best Buy (repeatedly) to confirm the $129.99 price. They did, it was no typo.

    18. Re:oh really? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Nice try, cheapskates, but everyone makes mistakes.

      Yes, and then they have to face the consequences of those mistakes.

      BB din't just advertise a price, they accepted payment at that price. That's binding.

      Granted, their store isn't the best store in the world, but in many communities it's the only store of its kind.

      The joy of big-box retailers...eliminate any competition, then you get to do what you want.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    19. Re:oh really? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      The fun part is in states where there are laws regarding the price tag on the product.

      they HAVE to sell you at an advertised or priced amount whatever is lower. this is enforceable by law in Michigan along with several other consumer protection laws. (like if they dont take your $50.00 or $100.00 for payment you DONT HAVE TO PAY as it is refusal of payment.. that works great at gas stations.)

      you need to lobby your state government to adopt consumer protection laws that make it illegal for scumbag businesses like best buy to play the bait and switch game (This obviousally is bait and switch)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    20. Re:oh really? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "In addition, if it's a typo, then you don't honor it."

      That may be how things work on the internet, but not in the real world. Heck, it wasn't too long ago that I got a Gravis Xperience gamepad at a Best Buy for the price of a Gamepad Pro because the demo was mispriced. See, in the real world saying "Oh, that was a typo, pay up" is a quick way to lose customers.

    21. Re:oh really? by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2

      Sure. But you've got to choose between honoring it for everybody who chose to buy based on that price, or refusing to honor it for everybody who chose to buy at that price.

      You don't get to honor the typo price for some folks and refuse to honor it for others. Of course, what you're actually going to choose depends on your cost/benefit analysis; honoring a price on a TV that's $10 below cost, for 4 people who are standing in your store waving ads is a no-brainer. Honoring a price on a video card that's $100 below your cost for 3,000 people who saw an ad on the net is less clear.

    22. Re:oh really? by gothamNY · · Score: 1

      Focusing on the verbiage of the web site is silly. It's not as if these are static pages -- they are dynamically generated. Had the pre-order sale price been inserted as "$329" instead of "199" the text surrounding it would change to say "SPECIAL PRE-ORDER! 329! $80 SAVINGS." I don't believe it was a bait-and-switch tactic as much as some poor schmo making a mistake when entering the sale price into the system.

      I don't agree with the tactics they chose to follow afterwards, but I do believe the price listed was made in error (obviously they wouldn't sell the card below cost).

    23. Re:oh really? by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2

      but I do believe the price listed was made in error

      What about the phone conversations with actual humans confirming the price? Error?

      obviously they wouldn't sell the card below cost

      Obviously you don't know what you're talking about.

      Keep in mind this was back ~1993-1997, so equations may have changed since then, but here's some personal experience:

      We frequently sold computers and selected peripherals at below cost. Margin was so thin on computers anyway, the store would pocket maybe $30 on a $2,000 computer. If you could get the guy in the store by selling a computer $100 below cost, and then sell him a $60 surge protector, $30 worth of floppy disks, a $5 mouse pad, a $50 game to play on it, and a $99 4-year extended warranty, you'd be well well ahead compared to having him sit at home and ignore your ad advertising your computer at a price that was $20 above cost.

    24. Re:oh really? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
      But it was "$129, reg $399, save $200", so the math actually worked out.

      I don't know what math you use, but in my math, 129 + 200 = 329 and 399 - 200 = 199.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    25. Re:oh really? by Zeio · · Score: 2

      I had a similar Problem with Buy.COM and there was a class action lawsuit and 3 years later I got a $60 coupon for my troubles. I would have liked to have gotten a $50 Hitachi monitor for th $163 dollars they promised it for.

      It has been committed in history FORVER, here:
      http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&frame=right& th=5c9f98e92d07422b&seekm=36C0A7EF.7AF4%40uclink4. berkeley.edu#link1

      I have had horrible experience with them as well. I won't even go into it, but they tried to do something fraudulent and were obstinate about owning up to it.

      The worst part of this all is that the "new" price of $399 is horrible.

      Here are a few links to show you how to find a deal on this card, Vision Tek part number 30001522 :

      Pricewatch Search for 30001522

      Tip on searching Pricewatch (my favorite); the url format is: [http://brook.pricewatch.com/search/search.asp?cri teria=item_criteria_here]

      Streetprices Search for 30001522

      Pricegrabber Search, I don't like Price-grabber, but its here to show that even a crappy Shylock engine is better than Worst Buy ©(TM)®.

      BEST BUY charged with FRAUD:
      Best Buy & HRS Credit Insurance Fraud to their customers. Big Ripoff Scam!

      Story also covered here:
      http://www.theinquirer.net/10020202.htm

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/24005.html

      http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/19176/

      http://courses.wcupa.edu/jredingt/BestBuy.htm

      http://www.hardocp.com/

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/24041 . tml Worst Buy Highway Robbery Inc. Trying to give only $30 bucks for mistake.

      http://hypothermia.gamershardware.com/

      http://hypothermia.gamershardware.com/articles/bes tbuy_gf4deal.html

      http://hypothermia.gamershardware.com/articles/bb_ arrest.html

      http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/4/24/11357/3033 .

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    26. Re:oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A reasonable person would understand that nobody is going to take $200 off of something priced at $329. After all, why would they sell a card at about half their cost? To lose money?

    27. Re:oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CORRECTION for the previous post.
      500 dollar monitor at the time.

      They gave me a $50 or $60 check.

      Jeeze, I'm falling asleep;

    28. Re:oh really? by hendridm · · Score: 1

      > Yes, and then they have to face the consequences of those mistakes.

      Agreed, but everyone makes mistakes and I'm sure people here wouldn't appreciate it if they owned a business and were targetted as the root of all retail evils for making a marketing mistake. Then again, apparently I'm the troll here so don't listen to me.

      > The joy of big-box retailers...eliminate any competition, then you get to do what you want.

      My point was that they are often the only electronics retailer in/near a smaller community. It's like Walmart building in piddly towns. Yes, they remove the "little guy", but who gives a shit. It's still quality (relatively speaking anyway). If you don't like what you see at Best Buy, go online geeks. Best Buy is nice for things I need quickly, or for some things that often aren't that much cheaper online.

    29. Re:oh really? by brianber · · Score: 1

      Were did you find this out? That would work great the next time I get home on leave. $12 in gas, no 20's, just 50's and higher. "I'm sorry sir, I can't accept any bill larger than a 20." YIPPEEE!

    30. Re:oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an old urban legend - nobody has to break your $10,000 bill except the Federal Reserve. The only case where it might apply is something like a old fashioned gas station where you pump first, pay later.

    31. Re:oh really? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Here's the catch....

      Make them refuse your 50, have them call the police. the police informs the moron behind the counter.. they grumble and accept your 50 anyways to avoid giving you free gas... and you promise the clerk that you will do this forever, and "see you next week!"

      It doesn't get you free gas, but it teaches a lesson to the idiots that run gas stations... they HAVE TO BY LAW accept legal tender. (Money)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    32. Re:oh really? by Kryptic+Knight · · Score: 1


      British law works quite well :
      • You can go to a shop and see a product and its price.
      • You can then take that product (or a token representing its sale) to the checkout.
      • You then 'make an offer to buy' the item at the price marked.
      • The seller then decides if they want to accept your offer to buy or decline it and suggest a new price. Note this lets the price go both up and down.

      One point however is that there are SEVERE penalties enacted against operations that can be shown to purposely misplace items either in advertising or on 'shelf prices' in order to lure customers to the checkout.

      However once they have accepted your purchase, they cannot back out of it. I've taken CarphoneWarehouse (a major UK mobile telephone reseller) to task over the webpricing of a handset on a 'pay as you go' policy and got them to back down. Lucky for me I had taken an 'offline copy' and also a static image of the page indicating the offer and emailed it to them when they started to disagree with me on the price.. which strangely changed after I first informed them of the problem.
      --
      --- This meme is memory intensive
  17. The police sided with the customer. by Hamshrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not that bad... the police sided with the guy, saying the manager shouldn't have done that. Seems like they're doing just what they should, in this case. Best Buy are being assholes about it, and they're getting slapped for it. No news here.

    --
    - Free tabletop fantasy gaming! Grey Lotus
    1. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whoopie do for the customer.

      Firstly, when he wants to get a job, a loan, anything, most of those forms always ask "Have you ever been arrested?" - now he has to write "Yes" and an accompanaying letter to explain it each time.

      Secondly, the couple of hours he would have had to spend with the police, the distress and the fear and the ensuing publicity that mentions his name, etc, are other issues.

      And also it seems that the same store honoured the deal 10 days before for a white customer, whilst he is a native american, so there could be claims for racial discrimination against Best Buy.

      Best Buy had better hope they get away with under $20,000 in costs, compensation and damage repair for this blunder.

      And the government needs to put some laws into place regarding online selling - there are going to be mistakes of course so it needs to deal with these fairly for both the customer and the company. If a company repeatedly does this, then it should be done under bait and switch laws, or whatever is suitable.

    2. Re:The police sided with the customer. by hagardtroll · · Score: 1

      Best Buy was a subject of a documentary (60 minutes or something like that.) because they kicked someone out of their store for comparison shopping. He had brought in a laptop and was entering the prices into a spreadsheet. He wanted to compare prices on certain products to other retailers. He sued, won the case then lost the case on appeal. That was a couple of years ago. I haven't darkened their doors since.

    3. Re:The police sided with the customer. by wizkid · · Score: 1


      As do I.
      My last experience with best buy was when they ran me around for an hour to do a price match on a cell phone. After getting bounced around for an hour, they said they wouldn't honor the deal because it was a cell phone, and they couldn't confirm the $50 rebate advertised in the paper that was in front of them. They treated my like a moron through the whole ordeal.

      That's the last time I'll ever go into that store. I show my apprieciation for good service with my $$$. Best Buy(NOT) will never see any more of my hard earned income. I recommend everyone to stay away from them.

      --
      I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
    4. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      usually those are "have you been CONVICTED of a crime" not just arrested

    5. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Unless he can get a false arrest suit through. But yeah, you can't sue for defamation or whatever just because you were arrested (if they had reason enough to justify you being arrested). Unless you're a minor, the media and everyone is free to tell the story of your arrest and why you were arrested. They just can't say that you actually committed the crime. They can say things like 'allegedly', etc. The media is usually very careful about these sort of things. If he is acquitted, then it's not on his record, and while people might remember it, they can't use it to keep from hiring him, deny services, etc.

      --
      What?
    6. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      [grouse]

      This may not have been intentional. My experience with Best Buy is that their stores are staffed by the least intelligent 16-year-olds they can hire. Additional requirements for employment there are a bad attitude, arrogance, and membership in a high-school A/V Club.

      [/grouse]

    7. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police sided with him? Arresting him for doing nothing illegal is siding against him! They may have said something after the fact, but I don't think you can be arrested for asking about valid receipt.

    8. Re:The police sided with the customer. by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Please don't compare the high school A/V club with Best Buy. We have standards you know.

    9. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Shadarr · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the States, but when I took a writing course (in Canada) we were told that saying "allegedly" is no protection, and if the person wanted to sue the paper they would probably win. What we were taught was that you describe the crime, with the police description of the suspect (if they have one) and then say John Doe has been arrested or charged, as the case may be. You can only say "John Doe broke into Radio Shack" after he's been convicted.

    10. Re:The police sided with the customer. by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's not that bad... the police sided with the guy, saying the manager shouldn't have done that. Seems like they're doing just what they should, in this case.

      Uh no. They didn't need to cuff him. That was completely unnecessary.

      You cuff someone if they're dangerous. He was being completely calm, and the cops could see that. So putting him in cuffs was definitely going overboard.

      Once, when I was in my early teens (but I was 6' tall) I punched a sign in a park in Lakeport, CA. A cop (and member of the SWAT team) cuffed me and put me in the front of the car without sliding the seat back; So I was bent over in the FRONT seat with my hands behind my back, bent over so far that my face was about a foot from the dash, because I would otherwise not fit into the car.

      Now, I want to tell you that this cop is a bad cop; He's known for predjudice, and for getting into the pants of someone's underage daughter. The guy's in his thirties, mind you, AND A COP. So one hopes that he's atypical...

      What's the point of all this crap? He had no right to treat me that way, especially since I did no damage to the sign (of course he claimed that I was the cause of a 2" crack in the wooden sign, which was BEHIND a piece of plexiglass) but he did anyway, and he got away with it. Don't start making excuses and allowances for cops because some of them are DEFINITELY bad guys. This asshole was one of them, and he's still a cop.

      We should hold our peace officers to a higher standard of behavior than anyone else in our society. Otherwise, the entire law enforcement system becomes one that is founded on hypocrisy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:The police sided with the customer. by wizkid · · Score: 1


      The High school kids were NOT the problem. The Management AXXHOLEs were the problem.

      The high school kids at least tried to help. Some of them did at least.

      There not the reason I believe everyone should boycott Best Buy. Management there SUCKS!!!

      --
      I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
    12. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no.

      It is standard police procedure to handcuff _anyone_ who is arrested, no matter how calm they may be.

      Your bad experience has noting to do with this.

    13. Re:The police sided with the customer. by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      "We should hold our peace officers to a higher standard of behavior than anyone else in our society. Otherwise, the entire law enforcement system becomes one that is founded on hypocrisy. "

      I am not defending jerk cops(I have had my fair share of run-ins with them), but as a society we demand a lot from this fairly low wage job. We want someone who will risk his/her life daily protecting us from scum(murders, thiefs, etc...), but then be completely cordial when WE interact with them. The problem is that I don't think those two personalities can co-exist in the same person.

    14. Re:The police sided with the customer. by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      I'm a tv production major here in the USA (I didn't do too well in my media law class; too much boring memorization; besides I focus on production, not writing news stories); but from what I remember you are correct; we were told that saying 'allegedly' is no protection - still a good idea, but it's no less damaging to John Doe's reputation to have allegedly committed a crime as to actually have done it. Of course; you have to say something and the chances of getting sued are somewhat remote; but simply saying 'allegedly' isn't a huge help if you are sued.

    15. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Firstly, when he wants to get a job, a loan, anything, most of those forms always ask "Have you ever been arrested?" - now he has to write "Yes" and an accompanaying letter to explain it each time.

      He said, "Kid, we only got one question. Have you ever been arrested?"

      And I proceeded to tell him the story of the Best Buy incident, with full orchestration and five part harmony and stuff like that and all the phenome... - and he stopped me right there and said, "Kid, did you ever go to court?"

      And I proceeded to tell him the story of the Best Buy ad and the twenty seven gazillion polygons per second with the textures and blitters and the paragraph beside the ad, explainin' what each feature was, and he stopped me right there and said, "Kid, I want you to go and sit down on that bench that says Group B. Now, kid!"

      And I, I walked over to the, to the bench there, and there is, Group B's where they put you if you may not be moral enough to join the company after committing your special crime, and there was all kinds of mean nasty ugly looking people on the bench there. Shoplifters. Receipt forgers. Receipt lifters! Receipt lifters sitting right there on the bench next to me! And they was mean and nasty and ugly and horrible crime-type guys sitting on the bench next to me. And the meanest, ugliest, nastiest one, the meanest receipt lifter of them all, was coming over to me and he was mean 'n' ugly 'n' nasty 'n' horrible and all kind of things and he sat down next to me and said, "Kid, whad'ya get?" I said, "I didn't get nothing, I had to pay $50 and didn't get the Geforce." He said, "What were you arrested for, kid?" And I said, "Defrauding a corporation." And they all moved away from me on the bench there, and the hairy eyeball and all kinds of mean nasty things, till I said, "And refusing to leave the store." And they all came back, shook my hand, and we had a great time on the bench, talkin about crime, shop forging, receipt lifting, all kinds of groovy things that we was talking about on the bench. And everything was fine, we was smoking cigarettes and all kinds of things, until the HR director came over, had some paper in his hand, held it up and said:

      "Kids, this-piece-of-paper's-got-47-words-37-sentences-58 -words-we-wanna- know-details-of-the-crime-time-of-the-crime-and-an y-other-kind-of-thing- you-gotta-say-pertaining-to-and-about-the-crime-I- want-to-know-arresting- officer's-name-and-any-other-kind-of-thing-you-got ta-say",
      and talked for forty-five minutes and nobody understood a word that he said, but we had fun filling out the forms and playing with the pencils on the bench there, and I filled out the incident with the four part harmony, and wrote it down there, just like it was, and everything was fine and I put down the pencil, and I turned over the piece of paper, and there, there on the other side, in the middle of the other side, away from everything else on the other side, in parentheses, capital letters, quotated, read the following words:
      ("KID, HAVE YOU REHABILITATED YOURSELF?")

      I went over to the HR director, said, "Director, you got a lot a damn gall to ask me if I've rehabilitated myself, I mean, I mean, I mean that just, I'm sittin' here on the bench, I mean I'm sittin here on the Group B bench 'cause you want to know if I'm moral enough join your company, fake accounting reports, forge requisitions, and lie to customers, after bein' arrested for trying to trick Best Buy about a video card price." He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Corporate."

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    16. Re:The police sided with the customer. by rworne · · Score: 1
      "Allegedly" never helled out Richard Jewel(sp?) the security guard hung out to dry by the media after the Atlanta Olympic bombing.

      Shortly after the FBI started looking into him, one of the stations put up a "hack and slash" job of out of context quotes (I'm going from memory here, but these quotes are pretty close): "here is the shed where he goes hunting with his doberman dogs" cut to another interview: "...yes he owns guns, lots of guns..." cut again, etc. They showed that only once--later there was more detail and he didn't look anywhere near as bad as portrayed in that first report.

      After this guy was smeared he tried to clear his name, the media fought back, and he lost.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    17. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please stay where you are. The copyright police will be there to arrest you for your DMCA violation. We don't give a damn if it's parody or fair use. That's Alice's Restaraunt, and you used it without paying! You're under arrest!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    18. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Skapare · · Score: 4, Informative

      However, there are some especially sensitive jobs for which merely an ARREST is flagged. The fact of being arrested generally doesn't disqualify one for such jobs, but if you fail to reveal it when asked, that's lying, perjury, and in some cases (applying for government jobs involving security and secrecy) possibly even a felony. When you do put down "YES" then you will be asked to explain the circumstances. While this is certainly not something that would be a problem, the fact of having to do this, possibly the rest of your life, can be a hindrance. And in some cases you can be improperly discriminated against if the employer finds it more convenient to hire someone slightly less qualified than you just because they won't have to check and validate the arrest record (if they have to ask for ARREST instead of CONVICTION for highly sensitive jobs, they surely have to followup and verify). Fortunately most jobs don't fall into these categories.

      Mr Cherian should have a lawyer pursue an action to have his arrest expunged so he can then legally say "NO" in the few cases an arrest might be asked about ... and then file suit naming the Best Buy store, the Best Buy company, and the store manager Rod Hill, to cover all legal expenses to set things straight. There is even the possibility of pursuing criminal action against the store manager for false arrest (the lawyer needs to advise on that).

      In the mean time, be sure to do searches on the bestbuy.com web site for terms like "arrest", "ripoff", "rod hill", "consumer terrorism", etc. They do log these things.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    19. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Skapare · · Score: 2

      The arresting officers and the detective handling the case are different people. It is normally NOT the job of the officers to make judgement calls like that. The case is then handed over to the detective who has to followup and determine what is appropriate. The police department is NOT liable in this case as long as the officers did their job (they did as far as I know) and especially when someone else (e.g. the store manager) was demanding the arrest and willing to file the charges. Mr. Cherian's beef is with the web site, the store, and the manager, the latter two mostly for the arrest. I do believe the store was in its legal rights to NOT honor the web site price. The fact that they have apparently honored it with others could have been an error on the part of some store employees, or it possibly could be racial discrimination (but there would have to be more of a pattern to it than this to make it stick in court).

      Be sure to take a friend the next time you shop at Best Buy. Better yet, take a lot of friends.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    20. Re:The police sided with the customer. by coyote-san · · Score: 2

      What do you mean "he lost?" IIRC he reached "out of court settlements" with confidentiality clauses with the media outfits he sued. That tells me that the media folded because they saw they were going to lose. If he folded the suits would have either been dropped, dismissed, or settled for some token amount.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    21. Re:The police sided with the customer. by frost22 · · Score: 2
      You cuff someone if they're dangerous. He was being completely calm, and the cops could see that. So putting him in cuffs was definitely going overboard.
      Huh ? Aren't we talking about the U.S.of A. ? The land where they arrest any pickpocket with a SWAT team ? Where handcuffs are mandatory ? Where people accused of obscure nonviolent bookkeeping crimes are forced to enter the court not only in handcuffs but barbarically chained at their feet ? Where a parking or speeding ticket can get you incarcarated, if you happen to be in the wrong place ? Where killing an unarmed law abiding citizen with 37 bullets results in an aquittal for all 4 involved cops, including a friendly pat on their back by the involved authorities ?

      Tell me, according to which standards is that "overboard" ?

      --
      ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
    22. Re:The police sided with the customer. by rworne · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right. Jewell did settle with NBC, the one case I remembered (and talked about above) was where he sued the city newspaper, and the Geogia Supreme court refused to hear the case. Anyhow, my point is that when the suspicion was no longer on him, the media was like: "oops, my bad" and he was left to pick up the pieces. Apparently, he was a hero for his actions in Atlanta, but now his name is forever tied with that event, and in a bad way. Part of the blame goes to him for accepting a settlement (usually confidential, and also without accepting blame/guilt). Still, whether a saint or a scumbag, he didn't deserve that treatment just so that news outlets can get their scoop.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    23. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is standard police procedure to handcuff _anyone_ who is arrested, no matter how calm they may be.

      Bullshit. It's completely arbitrary. I was at a protest at the nuclear test site in Mercury, Nevada, when Daniel Ellsberg and a woman associated with the Green party in Germany were both arrested for trespass. The cops cuffed the woman, who gave them some lip about being the only one cuffed. With typical cop logic, they cuffed Ellsberg, too. Nothing worse than government authority backed up with guns.

    24. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he is acquitted, then it's not on his record, and while people might remember it, they can't use it to keep from hiring him, deny services, etc.

      Maybe not on your planet, but down here, any HR officer who can't find some legally justifiable reason for not hiring any arbitrarily chosen person simply doesn't understand his job.

    25. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in some cases you can be improperly discriminated against if the employer finds it more convenient to hire someone slightly less qualified than you just because they won't have to check and validate the arrest record (if they have to ask for ARREST instead of CONVICTION for highly sensitive jobs, they surely have to followup and verify).

      More likely, having heard the explanation, they'll simply pass you over in favor of a more docile applicant. Many businesses don't like the idea of hiring anyone with balls enough to demand their rights, however politely.

    26. Re:The police sided with the customer. by Skapare · · Score: 2

      This certainly can be true. In one case I believe I did not receive a job offer because I asked for specific details about the stock option plan. My mistake was asking in such a way that gave away that I knew how these things worked (and didn't want to get ripped off by ending up with only about $5000 worth of options at the end of 5 years). A lot of businesses tend to prefer to hire "happy consumer" types (the kind they can push around).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  18. MaxPC by blankmange · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember reading about this in MaximumPC a month or two ago; Best Buy's stand then was that it was an error/typo and not a legally binding contract -- they said that they would not honor the price... seems that some of the stores have been honoring the price, unbeknownst to corporate management..

    --
    ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    1. Re:MaxPC by dissy · · Score: 1

      heh

      My signature on the credit card recept was also a typo and thus not a valid contract.. So its now not fraud to have the bank reverse the charges?

      Use their logic aginst them.

  19. Other Best Buy stories by Wells2k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work for an educational institution, and one of the doctors that I work for recently had an experience at the local Best Buy.

    He had just bought a harddrive and taken it home, only to find that inside the sealed box was a can of tuna. This is something so utterly rediculous, he decided to back up his case. He called the tuna manufacturer and found that the code stamped on the bottom of the can showed that the can had been shipped to the same county as the manufacturer of the harddrive.

    So now it is time to go to the store and try to get a replacement. Of course, everyone knows the story. The manager refused to honor the story, even when presented with this amount of evidence.

    The next step was for our doctor in question to go to a bigger regional manager and tell the story. When this manager heard the information about the problem and had looked up the purchasing history of this doctor, he immediately had a new harddrive waiting for the doctor.

    I have left quite a bit out of this story, including the bit about where the police were almost called and where the doctor notes to the first manager that he makes more in a month than the manager does in a year, but you get the idea.

    1. Re:Other Best Buy stories by JThaddeus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been boycotting Best Buy for over a year now. I my case, my wife and I bought a over-the-range microwave oven and hood with a 3 year in-home warranty (afterall, you don't want to have to uninstall it to get it fixed). When it broke, they refused to honor the in-home warranty. When we took it to the store, they kept it one week before returning it saying that they didn't fix them, a 3d party did. Then the closest 3d party they could find was in the next town over, 15 miles from out home. He also wouldn't come to the house and kept the microwave over a week. Since then I have heard numerous stories from locals with similar beefs over computers and other appliances. These days, I go to Circut City or Sears.

      --
      "Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
    2. Re:Other Best Buy stories by abh · · Score: 1

      I have left quite a bit out of this story, including the bit about where the police were almost called and where the doctor notes to the first manager that he makes more in a month than the manager does in a year...

      So what? The only thing that statement was likely to do was to further aggravate the already-unhappy manager...

    3. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Wells2k · · Score: 1

      So what? The only thing that statement was likely to do was to further aggravate the already-unhappy manager...

      I think that was the idea. He tends to blow his top pretty quick, which explains why the cops were almost called...

    4. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Peyna · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Sears has always had better customer service and warrantys than just about every place. Especially on their 'Craftsman' line of products. Lifetime warrantys, wheeeeeee...

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Other Best Buy stories by gfxguy · · Score: 1
      ...and where the doctor notes to the first manager that he makes more in a month than the manager does in a year, but you get the idea.


      Yes, that's the way to get a manager to be sympathetic to your problem...

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    6. Re:Other Best Buy stories by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

      It's true. My father, a mechanic, once left a (rather large) screwdriver in the track of a bulldozer. He only noticed it was there after the machine had trampled it. The handle was all broken, and the shaft was quite bent.

      Took it to the local Sears, and they didn't even ask what happened to it, but replaced it with a brand new, equivalent, screwdriver.

      As a result, he buys most of his tools there, now.

      S

    7. Re:Other Best Buy stories by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Several times I've gone in with an obviously abused tool, and replaced it without a problem. Once, my father took in a 3/8 ratchet that had most of the gear teeth stripped. While the clerk was ringing up the replacement, he just asked how big of a pry bar he was using. It was only a 3 ft pipe. I don't see the abuse. :)

    8. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      He had just bought a harddrive and taken it home, only to find that inside the sealed box was a can of tuna

      Is he a gynacologyst? I could see why he might be offended.

    9. Re:Other Best Buy stories by mscout1 · · Score: 0

      Especially on their 'Craftsman' line of products. Lifetime warrantys, wheeeeeee...


      Only for non-power tools. I tried to get my Craftsman hedge-trimmers replaced. They would not even fix it.

      --
      ------- I saw a VW Beatle the other day. The vanity Plates said "FEATURE"
    10. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      My neighboor just bought a new HP computer, a UPS, anti-virus, scanner, etc... - whatever he was talked into by the sales person. His money, not mine.

      But when they were looking at the receipt later, they noticed a charge for a $10 gift card. After calling BB, he was told that the card had part of the balance spent the same night he bought the computer, and part the next day.

      He explained that he did not buy the card, and why would he spend ~$1700 and buy a $20 card and use part of it later that day? He was told that the cashier must have accidentally rang one up - don't they have to activate them with an amount and stuff?

      I need to ask him what became of it. He said at one point the manager said something about other people complaining of the same thing, and basically one cashier doing this on a regular basis.

      I only go in BestBuy when absolutely necessary - and usually that is to look at an item before buying it online.

    11. Re:Other Best Buy stories by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      The point is that someone that makes that much money doesn't need to steal a $20 gift card. Maybe someone that makes as much as the manager or less might go through the trouble, but a doctor most likely would not.

    12. Re:Other Best Buy stories by tdrury · · Score: 2

      Perhaps they do now, but that wasn't always the case. When my parents were first married, my father got cancer and couldn't work for many months. They called all their creditors and asked for permission to defer payments for a few months until my Dad returned to work. All agreed except Sears. From that day no one in my family has ever purchased from Sears and that was probably 40 years ago. Sears pissed off enough customers that in the mid 80's they had to file chapter 7 (11?) re-org. My family had a nice little party that day. Boycotting does, on occasion, work.

    13. Re:Other Best Buy stories by rehannan · · Score: 2

      Craftsman hand-tools are guaranteed forever, not for life. That means you don't have to show a receipt or anything. Just take the defective tool in and they give you a new one (same model or something similar).

    14. Re:Other Best Buy stories by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      This sounds like an example of the manufacturer's incompetence, not Best Buy's. The can of tuna was inside the sealed box before it ever appeared in a Best Buy store.

      It sure is awful swell that the guy in this particular case ended up getting what was coming to him, but he's a highly paid professional who spends lots of money at Best Buy. Is there any doubt that an infrequent Best Buy shopper making minimum wage would have had much less success?

    15. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I bought Serious Sam from them -- and when I got home with the box, the jewel case in the sealed box was actually a Dr Dre CD, with a CD-R super-glued to it, and a big note that said "FUCK BEST BUY" glued down on it. Needless to say, they were unwilling to exchange this product.

      Now, I insist any box I am purchasing be opened at time of purchase by the clerk to verify the contents, because I do not wish to be stuck with another pig in a poke.

    16. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Skapare · · Score: 2

      Several years ago, there was a case that made the TV news about a gang of employees at the Best Buy located at LBJ and Midway in Dallas who were finally caught, after apparently more than a year of adding items to customer credit cards, often ringing them up again separately for the theft part. I don't think they had gift cards back then, else these guys would probably have used that scam, too. I don't know that the store management would have been in on this, but considering the low pay the employees and management make at these stores, you can expect more of these kinds of things. This is one of the reasons I don't buy things at BestBuy or at Frys.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    17. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is actually all to common--I used to work at a best buy where over half of the floor staff was fired because they had been replacing prod in boxes with dummy wieghts or whatever and re sealing boxes/cd cases (cds were often replaced with aol cds...) with the sealing machine...

    18. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nifty Sears story...I was in my project room (uh, toolshed) up in CT and was alerted to the presence of a rabid raccoon in the shed glaring at me, so I got a Craftsman pipe wrench off the pegboard and swung. Looking back, I think I got a limit break or something.

      Then the threads wouldn't twist properly, so I brought it to Sears a couple of days later with matted hair and blood on it, and asked for a return. They actually called the police, but gave me a new one when everything was sorted out.

      The choice quote was the dispatch officer, who said: "Who in their right mind would return the murder weapon to a Sears!?!"

    19. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Sears spun their Homelife stores off just a year before the chain went bankrupt, taking many consumers money for ordered furniature with it, including mine. Sears still owned stock in Homelife, but protested that they had no obligation to Homelife customers. It's pretty clear to me that Sears knew what was up and spun the Homelife bit off to avoid getting dirty.

      I will never do business with any Sears affiliated business again, and if a jaywalker is anyone known to be a Sears corporation employee, I won't brake.

      I got 2/3 of my money back, but still lost 2 grand to those bastards. I'm sure I'm not the only hosed customer that will badmouth Sears every time it's brought up in conversation for the rest of my life.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    20. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Two words - Winona Ryder

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    21. Re:Other Best Buy stories by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      Oh, come on, how many hard drive manufacturer's(don't mind my spelling) also sell tuna!!!!!

      "IBM tuna- more crunchy!" "Maxtor tuna lumps, the best spinning tuna ever!"

      It's not like hundreds of companies send their very different products to Mr. Box Co. to get their stuff packaged. Yes, similar stuff, but please don't try and say tuna and hard drives get packaged next to each other.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    22. Re:Other Best Buy stories by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      "The choice quote was the dispatch officer, who said: "Who in their right mind would return the murder weapon to a Sears!?!" "

      OJ

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    23. Re:Other Best Buy stories by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      3 words-
      videotape showed innocence

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    24. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fry's employees aren't allowed to make two charges to the same card at the same register for this reason. Fry's is generally paranoid about employee theft.

    25. Re:Other Best Buy stories by kenthu · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the time I got home from Blockbuster and found, in the video case, recordings of the Batman cartoon TV show instead of the actual movie I had rented.

      When I returned the next day to get the actual movie, I was accused of stealing the movie, since I hadn't called the store right away when I found the mistake! "Our workers are trained to check every video before it goes out to see if it's rewinded."

      I got my money back after some hassling, but I wonder what the outcome usually is when it's your word against theirs.

    26. Re:Other Best Buy stories by Suture · · Score: 1

      I've bought DVDs there before (but no more) and actually had the shrink wrapped cases be empty when I got home. This happened twice, one time after being called a liar and theif, they finally honored it and gave me a new one, but the other time (different location) they didn't replace it. I called corporate and sent email about both incidents, but never got any help from them either. I decided they were not worth the risk when others reported similar or worse things. There are better places to buy stuff.

      --
      The worst thing about censorship is ***END TRANSMISSION***
  20. I didn't know my rights by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

    I ordered the card via the website, got a return notification for my order, along with a confirmation number, and everything. About a week later I received an e-mail saying that all online orders for this item were cancelled.

    Two weeks later they sent another email saying that they were providing me with a $20 online credit for future Best Buy purchases... I took it-- if I hadn't, I could have taken them to court to get my card.

    ::cry::

    1. Re:I didn't know my rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      An automatically generated invoice should not be taken as acceptance of your order in my opinion.

      However taking the money out of your credit card should be.

      I just think that the law needs clarifying.

      And you get $20 now, you didn't give a lawyer a nice graphics card in 4 years time...

  21. Bad Buy by umm+qasr · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Best Buy advertising then refusing to sell the GF4 at the low price is actually quite old news. The arrest of the Indian American is actually new. We know Best Buy should honour the low price, but as any company would, they tried to get out of it. Steve @ Hypothermia (and HardOCP) has done alot of work, and indirectly (&directly) got many people their GF4's at the low price, Good Job!

    If what has been reported is true about the Indian American being arrested for trying to get his GF4 at the low price. That is a whole new story. Reading up at Hypothermia and the HardOCP Forums it seems so. After some of my experiences at Best Buy, and all this nonsense over the GF4 they are definately on My List. This story about arresting a guy over what happened is just the icing on the cake.

    What exactly happened still seems a bit unclear, and we should probably what for Best Buy's response, but it really doesn't surprise me that Best Buy acted this way. Their company cultrue seems to foster turning employees into assholes. IMHO, of course.

    1. Re:Bad Buy by shren · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Their company cultrue seems to foster turning employees into assholes.

      You'd be an asshole too if you worked register there. I have never been in a best buy where each register didn't have at least two people waiting in line. I've stopped shopping there since twice they've had register wait times of over 15 minutes or more.

      You'd think that they'd know how bad that is for thier buisness - half of what I bought in Best Buy was impulse buys. You make me wait that long and the impulse fades - I set my 'best buy' on the counter and go see a movie instead.

      --
      Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
    2. Re:Bad Buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's an American Indian, not an Indian American. there's a big difference. Teepees, not dots.

    3. Re:Bad Buy by bobKali · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this is really a case of someone being arrested for trying to redeem his receipt, or if this is a case of someone printing out the sample receipts posted on Hypothermia and trying to use those to commit fraud.

    4. Re:Bad Buy by Blackwulf · · Score: 2

      I have never been in a best buy where each register didn't have at least two people waiting in line. I've stopped shopping there since twice they've had register wait times of over 15 minutes or more.

      Actually, I've had the distinct pleasure of waiting 15 minutes in a line that then CLOSED - and they moved us all to a line that did NOT accept credit cards. I was told to either go to the back of another line or leave the premesis by a manager.

    5. Re:Bad Buy by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
      You'd be an asshole too if you worked register there. I have never been in a best buy where each register didn't have at least two people waiting in line. I've stopped shopping there since twice they've had register wait times of over 15 minutes or more.

      That's the one thing I hate most about Best Buy. I'm surprised you only had two people waiting in line. Of course it seems like when I go in, the line isn't so bad, but by the time I reach the checkout lines they're all three or four deep, and at least one has a problem that needs a manager.

      But refusing to sell an item at a "typo" price less than cost isn't as bad as trying to create their own video format with heavy encryption, requiring a phone line, and with a 48-hour viewing window price that's more than most video rental stores. As for the phone droids called up to confirm the price, they were probably looking at the same database, or even the same web page. That kind of phone droid is one level below your average nationwide ISP tech support desk, and we all know how smart those are.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    6. Re:Bad Buy by nadaou · · Score: 1
      > The arrest of the Indian American is actually new.

      > If what has been reported is true about the Indian American being arrested



      His name is Abraham Cherian, whitey.

      Why the hell is this even mentioned in the slashdot write-up???

      Is the original poster insinuating Rod Hill, the BestBuy manager, is racist as well as not too bright in the customer relations dept; or just think the most important thing he can say about a man is his family's heritage?

      [stomping on stupidity is more important than breaking the /. blackout. This is a recursive statement.]

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    7. Re:Bad Buy by nadaou · · Score: 1

      Sorry, make that Cherian Abraham.

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    8. Re:Bad Buy by cneo · · Score: 1

      I can confirm this. I used to work at best buy and after working there and severly wondering if my Jedi skills of persuasion should be used for selling such "service plans"... I one day walked into a neigboring Best Buy only to be lied, hassled, and then pushed by an employee. Since I worked in the same computer department I knew he didnt know what he was talking about, so I contested his "all knowing" best buy knowledge and then proved him wrong via *pointing to box*. Then he spewed unkind remarks and then when I tried to get him to help me with another product, I was pushed. Then I had him called the manager who further hassled me as if I had done otherwise.

      Best Buy manager told me that they use Blue in the store, because it has the best subliminal effect (relax and feel good) on the consumer and their layout was all part of a way to draw the consumer in. Speaking to my friend, I realize best buy is a nice place to be... and then shaking my head, I realized the brain washing that had occurred.

      Best Buy is like Frys, they just hide the cattle herding and incompetant employees better.

  22. I ordered one of the cards.... by telstar · · Score: 3, Informative

    To make up for their screw-up, BestBuy sent everybody a $30 gift-certificate. Obviously, it's not a GF4, but it seemed like a good attempt to correct an obvious misprint.

    1. Re:I ordered one of the cards.... by Peyna · · Score: 2

      They still owe me about $50 for a rebate I sent in nearly a year ago, any chance I'm ever going to get that check in the mail? And what I can do to get them to send it to me?

      --
      What?
    2. Re:I ordered one of the cards.... by Tower · · Score: 1

      True, I along with a few friend who had ordered with the low price up there all received an e-mail certificate for $30 off an online order (with some restrictions)...

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    3. Re:I ordered one of the cards.... by coldmist · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the $30 coupon originated from Cheetah Mail, an online direct marketing company. So, now they sold your information to a marketing company as well.

      The $30 "gift-certificate" (actually a "coupon") also had a few extra strings attached.

      What a nice way to "make up for their screw-up."

      Also, if you used it, then you forfeit your ability to enter into any class-action lawsuit, or complain in any way after that, or receive any part of a settlement or compromise that could happen at a later date.

      --
      Don't steal. The government hates competition.
    4. Re:I ordered one of the cards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Best Buy's gift certificates are suceptible to error as well. I received one as a gift, and tried several times to redeem it at a local store. The manager not only refused to honor the card, but insisted that it must have been stolen.

      I don't shop there any more.

    5. Re:I ordered one of the cards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the guy above only got $20... More inequality.

    6. Re:I ordered one of the cards.... by isoteareth · · Score: 1

      I don't recall the email or any other notice telling me I was giving up those options.

    7. Re:I ordered one of the cards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you knew anythign about anything you would realize that direct marketing is used in multiple different ways.

      Ever gotten one of thei Preffered Customer Coupons?
      How do you think they get all of those out?

      :shock: they go through a direct marketing firm who;s JOB is to send out heavy volumes of mail.

      That in no way implies a sale of any personal information on ANYONES behalf.

      Hate to interject something and stupid as logic here....

    8. Re:I ordered one of the cards.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they wanted to sell your information to a marketing company, they would just do that and skip the $30 part.

  23. Didn't Best Buy do this once before? by Zenjive · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if it was BestBuy or a different chain superstore, but I seem to remember something about a mis-priced computer product making a big stink about a year ago.

    If I am correct and it was Best Buy, there's more to this than a simple typo in an ad!

    --


    A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with. - Tennessee Williams
    1. Re:Didn't Best Buy do this once before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right. 2 typos in one year is a SCAM CONSPIRACY.

    2. Re:Didn't Best Buy do this once before? by demonbug · · Score: 1

      I think that was hard drives at Amzon or something. They were selling them for like $20 instead of $200. That time it was an obvious typo, but teh general reaction was pretty much the same. No $30 coupon from them, however.

  24. Email response by ajs · · Score: 5, Informative

    Still waiting for mine! ;-)

    --

    From: onlinestore@bestbuy.com
    To: <ajs@ajs.com>
    Subject: BestBuy.com Backorder Notice
    Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 05:32:13 -0600
    Message-ID: <EC0250S603avN3qljWw0001d1ed@ec0250s603.xbby.co m>

    Dear Aaron Sherman,

    Thank you for shopping at BestBuy.com!

    Unfortunately, the following item(s) are still unavailable to be shipped, but we hope to be able to ship this item(s) to you soon.

    If you prefer to cancel this item from your order, please contact our Customer Care representatives at onlinestore@bestbuy.com or call our Online Store help center toll-free at 1-888-BESTBUY (1-888-237-8289).

    We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

    ORDER NUMBER: 213****
    Order Date: Feb 6, 2002
    Credit Card Used: ****************

    Item Description Type Qty Web Price Total Status

    VisionTek Xtasy GeForce4 Ti 46 --- 1 $129.99 $129.99 On Backorder

    [................] SNIP!

    1. Re:Email response by seann · · Score: 1

      they email you the credit card number?
      Pain..

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    2. Re:Email response by ajs · · Score: 2

      No, but they do email the last four digits. I'm not sure I'm happy with that, but it's better than sending the whole thing.

    3. Re:Email response by mavjop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't hold your breath.

      I ordered the Star Trek movies box set from Best Buy at a low-ish (but not unbelievable) price, absolutely in good faith. As the release date approached, all seemed fine. When it passed, the thing changed to "Backorder". I kept checking back to see if the status had changed, and then one day they sent me an e-mail saying _they_ had decided to cancel my order because it had been on backorder too long (hey, now! I was prepared to wait! They shouldn't be cancelling my order because it was taking too long). I checked their web site the same day, and they'd increased the price significantly.

      I had no option to reinstate my order at the same price and wait again (I even called and requested this). What was particularly fishy was the fact that the "we've cancelled your backordered item" mail went out on or around the same day that they jacked up the price.

      Regards,
      sj

    4. Re:Email response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last four digits are a checksum anyways. Doubt there's anything to worry about there...

    5. Re:Email response by seann · · Score: 1

      last four digits, totaly acceptable.

      I almost pissed my pants when I saw that "credit card number:"

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  25. They made a mistake on their website .. by roguerez · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    .. and within minutes the news about the mistake was propagated throughout Usenet.

    Hundreds, if not thousands, of people were placing orders KNOWING that the price was a mistake. Look up the archives in Google to see for yourself.

    People tried to abuse a mistake on the part of Best Buy. They gambled and lost, but apperantly have a problem with that. I suspect these are the same people that stick lower price tags on products in shops as well, before taking them to the checkout..

    1. Re:They made a mistake on their website .. by indros13 · · Score: 1
      I agree 100%. The internet makes it so easy to take advantage of a misprint. Obviously, if the price looks too good to be true, it probably is.


      I had an issue like this once on a website for a CPU/mobo combo. I selected the mobo and then added the cpu, but it didn't add any more price! Rather than be a dick about it and demand my ultra cheap combo, I called the customer service and asked them if the price was accurate. Obviously, it wasn't.


      We all make mistakes, even corporations. Just because Best Buy makes umpteen million dollars a year doesn't mean we all have the right to rip them off when they make a mistake. They're even being generous enough to give away gift certificates to people who tried to take advantage of them. Sounds like Best Buy is pretty reasonable.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    2. Re:They made a mistake on their website .. by YourFavoriteBandSux · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of people didn't read the posts. Here's the part you didn't read: we found an Advertisement at BestBuy.com yesterday that proclaimed "VisionTek GeForce4 Ti4600 for Special Pre-Order Price of $129.00..the savings is a $200.00 Value". Normally a "typo" or mistake would be something to the effect of a misplaced decimal point or an accidental wrong price. It usually doesn't consist of adding terms like Special Pre-Order Price and savings is a $200.00 Value, ( since it sounds reasonable $129.00 + $200.00 savings for a card announced that day with no real set price yet ) all over the advertisement. So we did the right thing and CALLED. BestBuy.com confirmed the price of $129.00 twice, at which time they gave us the $200.00 value / saving quotes. That sound like a typo to you?

      --


      ---
      Two rights don't make a wrong, but three rights make a left. -Me
    3. Re:They made a mistake on their website .. by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      It's LAW that we're talking about here - not what you think other people KNOW. Can you *prove* that people KNOW the price as a mistake? Or is it just a guess, however educated it is?

      With your reasoning, I can also say the store KNOW the price is wrong, they just put it there anyway to lure potential buyers. The store gambles and lost. What's the difference?

      People who stick lower price tags on products are criminals - but if the people *from the store* put the price there at the first place, it's a totally different story.

    4. Re:They made a mistake on their website .. by MikeTheYak · · Score: 2

      No, it sounds like they copied the price from the wrong product. Still a legitimate mistake. And I say that as one of the folks that got ordered one of those puppies at $129.00. The law is flexible enough that merchants won't get hammered for mistakes like this. Now, if I had placed the order and paid $129.00, I would be howling for a lawyer. Best Buy screwed up, and they tried to make it right with a bajillion $30 gift certificates. As a consumer, I don't think I have a legitimate complaint about that. Of course, none of this has anything to do with the behavior of Mr. Hill, which I find inexcusable.

    5. Re:They made a mistake on their website .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then since that mistakes seems to happen a lot lately (see other posts above) Then Shit Buy should start paying for it don't you think?

    6. Re:They made a mistake on their website .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where'd you get your law certificate from? Harvard? Princeton? There's no law obligating Best Buy or anyone else to fucking sell you anything AT ALL. If they felt like it, they could tell you to fuck off and it would still be OK. Why the fuck do you think they should sell you a $400 card for $120? Because some fucktard said so?

  26. -1 bad taste by I.T.R.A.R.K. · · Score: 0
    "Hill informed police that Abraham Cherian, an Indian American, was trying to rip off the store...

    Are you insinuating something, Michael?
    Quit trying to play the race card. No one gives a flying fuck what race/nationality/sexual preference/whatever the guy is/has. "Indian American" has nothing to do with the reason they had his ass hauled off. The manager made a judgement call. He felt someone was trying to rip off the store, so he did something about it. Plain and simple.

    "...the same store that had conceded to give another customer his video card as requested 10 days earlier.

    The same store, perhaps. But was the manager notified the first time it happened? Selling one video card at a marked down price is one thing. But when people start coming out of the woodwork, employees start to notice that something isn't right.

    --

    "Adequacy.org: Where congenital stupidity is not an option, but a requirement."

  27. From the BestBuy Website: by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 1

    Here is the text:

    Errors on Our Site
    Prices and availability are subject to change without notice. Errors will be corrected where discovered, and Best Buy reserves the right to revoke any stated offer and to correct any errors, inaccuracies or omissions including after an order has been submitted and whether or not the order has been confirmed and your credit card charged. If your credit card has already been charged for the purchase and your order is cancelled, BestBuy.com will issue a credit to your credit card account in the amount of the charge. Individual bank policies will dictate when this amount is credited to your account.

    While Best Buy takes steps to ensure the accuracy and completeness of product and third-party services provided, please refer to the originator of information for details, for example the manufacturer for complete product details.


    I find it a bit embarrassing that every time a corporation makes an honest mistake, many Slashdot readers begin to chant "BOYCOTT!" Just because they didn't get some goody at an exceptional loss for the company. You can ALWAYS get your money back if you order with a credit card.

    1. Re:From the BestBuy Website: by JDAustin · · Score: 0

      FYI, this TOS was changed AFTER the price error.

    2. Re:From the BestBuy Website: by sheldon · · Score: 2

      Well there we go. Best Buy has a disclaimer that addresses this issue.

      Unless someone can prove that they advertised the product fraudulently, it seems like this issue is closed.

      I will point out that Best Buy in their infancy did have some problems with fraudulent advertising, and was fined several times by different government agencies in Minnesota. But that's been at least 15 years ago, and those were back when they frequently advertised things for cheap and then took them off the sales floor so as to say they were out of stock. That's called Bait and Switch, and is illegal.

    3. Re:From the BestBuy Website: by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. There's a million great reasons to boycott Best Buy without having to use this situation.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    4. Re:From the BestBuy Website: by GLX · · Score: 1

      There's nothing that says that this disclaimer wasn't posted the day after they found out about the problem to CTA.

      Anyone able to find an older version from WayBack or the Google cache? I can't.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    5. Re:From the BestBuy Website: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would normally save their asses, but this part of their "disclaimer" was added weeks after the initial mistake that was made. Steve @ Hypothermia has a before-and-after of the entire disclaimer/terms of service.

    6. Re:From the BestBuy Website: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was not a fuckin honest mistake. Start reading the freakin info that are so conveniently given to you.

    7. Re:From the BestBuy Website: by geekoid · · Score: 2

      and if I had a disclaimer saying I was not resposible for anybody I killed that was wearing a blue shirt, would it be legal?

      Plus they honored it, for some people, and had a guy arrested for bogus reasons.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:From the BestBuy Website: by sheldon · · Score: 2

      Do you seriously consider a pricing mistake to be the equivalent of murder?

      Weird.

    9. Re:From the BestBuy Website: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Do you seriously consider a pricing mistake to
      >be the equivalent of murder?

      Knowingly making false statements to police
      in order to have someone arrested, then knowingly making further false statements when confronted by those police, *does* start to tread on first-degree felony with aggravating factors ground.

      So in the sense that the store manager might get
      20 years to life before this is all said and done, the answer to your question might be "yes."

  28. Sorry.... by Grape+Smuggler · · Score: 0

    But if someone actually thought they would get a GeForce card for $125, then they get what they deserve.

    I personally would have assumed it was a typo, and left it at that. And if Best Buy would not sell the card for $125, who cares? Are you any worse off?

    There have got to be better things to get pissed off about.

  29. Boycott...? by smithmc · · Score: 1

    I would suggest a boycott, but somehow I get the impression that not too many /.ers buy their gear from Best Buy, huh?

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    1. Re:Boycott...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm sure it'll be wildly sucessful, just like the slashdot blackout.

  30. What Best Buy needs to consider by dlgree1 · · Score: 1

    BestBuy needs to think about the future. The people in charge need to realize that in the long run they will make more money by not pissing customers off. My guess would be that none of those 2000 people will ever regularly shop at BestBuy again. However, if they just sold the cards at the advertised price they would have gained 2000 happy customers who would, using word of mouth, tell others to shop there. This would make BestBuy more money in the long run.

    1. Re:What Best Buy needs to consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make a very valid point.

      I had a similar experience with Duracell. I had a Cinncinati Microwave radar detector, battery operated, start to fail and make odd noises. On inspection, I noticed the batteries had died and leaked acid, ruining the unit. I don't know if the Passport radar detector was supposed to notify of weak batteries or what, but I immediately threw out the batteries (lest they eat my car carpet). A few weeks later, I happended to remember the incident, went to Duracell's web site, and dropped a trite note, not expecting anything.

      Mind you this was back in '97 or so, and the web wasn't that big a deal for companies. You can imagine my surprise when a Duracell rep called, asked how much my unit was worth, and sent me a check for $300 and a bunch of coupons for free batteries.

      I HAVE told his story to many people, mainly /. types, and I have ALWAYS bought Duracell batteries since....

    2. Re:What Best Buy needs to consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      K I cannot be certainbut a bunch of people who call BB employees assholes and generally don't shop there anyways probably won't make of an impact on their business.

      Considering the market segment this affected I doubt it will affect BB much at all.

  31. Buy Comp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy Comp has done the same thing. I remember back in 1999 they had posted Hitachi 19inch monitors for a crazy low price (its been so long i forget the exact figures). It was so low that that monitor got flagged as the best selling monitor on their site, and then they didn't honor the selling price when it came to shipping time.

  32. Re:JEWS by Jacer · · Score: 1

    you're, it's a contraction for you are, your is poessive example: you're an idiot

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  33. WRONG by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's Best Buy's obligation to make sure their prices are accurate.

    Once again, Michael posts bullshit that is totally wrong.

    Stores are not legally responsible to honor typographical errors. Period. If there is some intentional fraud, then prove that. Otherwise, these people should grow up and live in the real world.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:WRONG by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're incorrect. IANAL, but I have talked with some, and here in GA, they are required BY LAW to honor that price, period.

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    2. Re:WRONG by JabXVI · · Score: 1

      Read the article. This is not merely a typographical error; they were called and confirmed the price.

    3. Re:WRONG by terrymr · · Score: 2

      Based on script interpretation of contract law you are right. However most jurisdictions criminal codes prohibit advertising of false prices. It is very hard in this case for best buy to escape liability because of a mistake as they confirmed the price to many people before changing their mind.

    4. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The usage accepted by you maybe. You might want to look up the work "native" in a dictionary of some sort.

    5. Re:WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a retail chain (in the corporate office), and I can tell you that although in store signs do not have to be honored, if we fuck up and print the incorrect price in our newspaper ads we legally have to honor it. Tough luck for us, but it has happened and we lose money because of it. Someone is supposed to review promos and ads to make sure that there aren't any fuckups before they go into print.

    6. Re:wrong by Computer! · · Score: 2

      It would be abuse of process, malicious prosecution, and defamation.

      Uh, excuse me? They had a man fucking arrested for showing a receipt to a clerk. Ever been arrested before? It sucks, even if you actually did something to deserve it. When you're falsely arrested, it's humiliating and infuriating. I think they should sue the police for arresting a citizen with no evidence or warrant while they're at it.

      Also, there's no such thing as "malicious prosecution" in a civil case. And, by "abuse of process" do you mean barratry? IANAL, but I sure hope you aren't either.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    7. Re:wrong by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2
      No, I am not a lawyer.

      False arrest is if the police arrests you with no basis (wrong person, or they were pissed off). It is hard charge to bring against the police as much of it is discressionary and you have to show an abuse of discression.


      See the definition for for malicious prosection. Then read a piece from the Colorado bar on litigating an abuse of process claim.

      And no, I am not a lawyer, but I am obviously better versed in the law than you.

    8. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you might want to look up "Native American" in a dictionary of some sort...

  34. Better Business Bureau? by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Has anyone who's gotten stiffed from Best Buy called the BBB?

    Hmmm ... 2000+ calls may do something about the problem.

    --
    Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
    1. Re:Better Business Bureau? by 9633 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I'm trying to get them to have best buy.com removed from their online program because they are not following the rules.

    2. Re:Better Business Bureau? by dmuth · · Score: 2
      Has anyone who's gotten stiffed from Best Buy called the BBB?

      Hmmm ... 2000+ calls may do something about the problem.

      Actually, it'd probally be much quicker/efficient to file a complaint online. I've done it before against companies that have sent me spam, and have actually gotten responses out of the BBB.
    3. Re:Better Business Bureau? by SkywalkerOS8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the linked page you'll see the "saga" that Steve has gone through with the BBB. They are nothing but an organization that collects large "dues" from corporations and does nothing about complaints. The BBB contact that Steve spoke with outright lied about people getting the cards at $129 even AFTER being confronted with undeniable evidence! Its been a real eyeopener for a lot of people.

    4. Re:Better Business Bureau? by rapid+prototype · · Score: 1

      i have had great success in getting the BBB to get my money refunded from scam sites.

      -rp

    5. Re:Better Business Bureau? by terradyn · · Score: 1

      The BBB is so bogged down with complaints that I doubt even 2000+ people would make much of a difference. What they are able to do is put companies on a list. How many people actually go to the BBB and check out this list before purchasing at an establishment? I really don't think the BBB is the way to go. Legal pressure is the only thing I can see working. Also, would the people that keep saying it's a typographical error actually read the page. A typo would be one or two characters, not an entire sentence about the exact savings off the list price.

    6. Re:Better Business Bureau? by SkywalkerOS8 · · Score: 1

      Was it a large corporation that paid large "dues"? If it wasn't, then I'm not surprised the BBB was on your side. Concerning Best Buy, they aren't about to "bite a hand that feeds them".

    7. Re:Better Business Bureau? by Eric+Green · · Score: 2
      The Better Business Bureau is a scam set up by business interests in order to head off stiffer consumer protection laws. The notion is that they can claim that businesses are self-regulating and thus do not need to be policed for fraud, misrepresentation, and failure to provide the paid-for goods and services.

      The way the BBB operates is that if you make a complaint about a business who is a BBB member, they contact that member and ask about that complaint. All that is necessary is that the member say "Yes, we've satisfied that customer," and the complaint is removed from the BBB's records. Note that no proof is required, and the customer is never contacted to see whether he was indeed satisfied -- all that's necessary is that little one-sentence lie from the BBB member.

      If you make a complaint about a company that is NOT a member, on the other hand, the BBB contacts said company and states that they have a complaint, and asks if said company wishes to become a BBB member. If the company does not, the complaint remains on the BBB's records. If the company does join the BBB, they are allowed to have the complaint dismissed by simply saying "Oh yeah, we satisfied that customer."

      So not only is the BBB a scam, it's also a racketeering operation too, that threatens companies with blacklisting if there's even a single dissatisfied customer (no matter how stupid) if the company refuses to join. No consumer advocate worth his beans trusts the BBB to do anything other than stand up for its aying members.

      --
      Send mail here if you want to reach me.
    8. Re:Better Business Bureau? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this is incorrect.
      I had two complaints filed with the BBB with two different companies. In both cases the two companies were very responsive in solving my complaint (while before to contact the BBB they ignored me for months).
      After the whole issue was solved the BBB contacted me to know if my issues were solved or if I wished to persue a better solution. (I was happy so the complaint was removed).

      Just my experience.

  35. Damn right! by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's Best Buy's obligation to make sure their prices are accurate.

    This statement is 100% correct. The store manager in Dekalb who had that man arrested should in turn be arrested and sued for false arrest. When I worked for The Home Depot a few years back here in Macon, one of our signs for a 24 foot fiberglass ladder (nice ladder) was priced $100 too low. We honored it without any problems. Why? Two reasons: 1) it was our fault, and 2) it's the law.

    Companies that don't honor advertised prices (whether it was an honest mistake or not) are obligated to sell the merchandise at that price. This is not '$199.95 or best offer', this is '$199.95'.

    --
    Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    1. Re:Damn right! by QuodEratDemonstratum · · Score: 1

      The manager isn't guilty of false arrest - he didn't arrest the customer. He called the police and the police decided to arrest the customer.

    2. Re:Damn right! by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 1

      If he called the police to come arrest a man who is in his store legally, the police are required to remove the man from the premises. The police are not guilty of doing their job; the store owner is guilty of having them arrest the customer.

      Assuming the man wasn't shouting vulgarities or threatening anyone with bodily harm, he was 100% within his rights and within the law. He can fuss and carry-on all day long if he so wants to. You can't argue and say "well he was disrupting the store" without also arguing the manager was doing likewise by not making good on the sale.

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    3. Re:Damn right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...no it's not. A price is an invitation to bargain.....not a binding contract. EVERYWHERE. Get a clue. Most stores honor the price anyway to shut the customer up (i.e. it's not worth the hassle.)

    4. Re:Damn right! by QuodEratDemonstratum · · Score: 1

      You can't argue and say

      I wasn't - I was saying the store isn't guilty of false arrest (a very serious crime). It is clear they were wasting the police officer's time.

    5. Re:Damn right! by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      IT's not the law, whatsoever.

      You sell the ladder because it's good customer relations, and you aren't going to lose your shirt. If you had a thousand people lined up to buy that ladder, you wouldn't sell it.

      A advertised price is not a binding contract. It is advertising.

      Unless best buy can be shown to be comitting deliberate fraudulent advertising... it is a clerical error, and they are not bound to do anything.

    6. Re:Damn right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is called "bait and switch" and it is illegal in most states. Apparently there are some some Attorney Generals offices that agree. Additionally, the fact that some orders have actually been honored leaves Best Buy open to discrimination suits.

    7. Re:Damn right! by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to GA law, and advertised price IS a binding contract because failure to sell an item at that price is false advertisement. It doesn't matter if the price is a misprint or some other form of mistake. The customer sees the price and decides to purchase the item. The damage is doneby then; nothing can take it away. Failure to require the merchant to honor an advertised price (mistake or not) would open up a massive loophole. Merchants could then eggs at $0.12 a dozen and then ring them up at the register as say $1.20. "It was just a misprint."

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    8. Re:Damn right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately what most people dont realize is that you can get kicked out of a store for any reason, whether or not you were being disruptive. The manager called the police, but the police dont have to arrest the man, they could have escorted him from the building. Its ultimately up to the police. Store doesn't like your shoes? They can kick you out. They can legally do that because they are a private institution. Do they do that? Um no not really cause its bad PR but they certainly can.

    9. Re:Damn right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh...no
      How about if i were black- and the manager just happened to not like black folk - could they kick me out then?... of course not - at least not legaly .

      R.I.P your arguement
      Therm

    10. Re:Damn right! by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Somehow I doubt that merchants are required by law to honor misprints.

    11. Re:Damn right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are talking about $100 to correct the error.

      We are talking about $442,000 to correct this error.

      I don't think it's a fair comparison.

    12. Re:Damn right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, you don't call the police and say "hey we have a guy we want you to arrest". The police show up, decide if the man is causing a disturbance, and remove him if neccisary.

      And from the report it sounds more like the police thought they shouldn't have been called, not the man shouldn't have been arrested.

      Because saying he shouldn't have been arrested implies wrongdoing on the behalf of the police dept. but saying they shouldn't have been called only implies wrongdoing on the behalf of BestBuy.

  36. Guess they'll have no more of this for a while... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I quote from the Best Buy site, for a GEForce4 Ti 4600...

    "Not available for delivery at this time. Not available for store pickup."

  37. Best Buy going down hill by billnapier · · Score: 1

    I used to shop at Best Buy alot, because they always had good sales on things I like to purchase (music, videos, electronics, etc.). I couldn't leave there without something in my hands... I had a problem.

    I don't know if its just me or what, but the store quality has declined. I've had rude store employees; I've had stupid store employees; I've been in Best Buy when I've known more about their sales then their employees. And don't get me started on their "Extended Warantee" program (you were just telling me how great this is, and now you're trying to convince me that its crap?)

    It's a shame that there is really no other place to go to get "nice" electronic's at reasonable prices (plz. don't mention Circuit "I make stuff up" City...), at least hear on the Easat Coast.

    So I guess I'm stuck with going to Best Buy and making sure to do my research before hand and not take any crap from their employees.

  38. Out of the woodwork :) by cOdEgUru · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Allright, can I have one minute of fame here ?? please :)

    They even got my name all wrong, it should be Cherian Abraham, not the other way around..sheesh!

    Its true. This all went down last Friday at the Best Buy store at Tucker, GA. I am just gonna repeat what happened word by word. Makes quite an interesting reading. And I would really appreciate if you guys could tell me where I should go from here.

    So I went to BB at Tucker,GA last Friday armed with the receipts, my original and the copies I printed from the site. I was dumb enough to trust BB and I didnt have anyone to take along with me for the ride. I know I should have.

    There was only one card left on the aisle, so I grabbed with a couple of other things (a 80GB HD and a Platinum Audigy) and went to the counter. There was this customer service lady who told me that six or seven people have been trying to PM with the same receipt there and its not possible. She said that the receipt was a fake, the guy who created it is no longer with BB etc. She asked me if I wanted to talk to the manager, so I said yes.

    Out comes the General Manager called Rod, I politely explained why I am there. He asked me to follow him to a separate room. He did not want to discuss further details standing outside, he wanted me to follow him. Neither did he tell me then and there that I should get the heck out of there. I was kinda hesitant at first, but I thought no better of it and followed him. Inside we sat down and started going through the receipts. Then another guy, a sales manager called Paul McKim comes in, and suddenly Rod jumps out and drags him out whispering something. Rod comes back in and we start going through the same shit again. I believed that I would make him see the sense of it if I kept my cool and explained everything . He was giving me all fucked up reasons and all I wanted was a yes or no. He told me "I dont know whether I can pricematch that low, but let me ask my Sales manager".

    15 mins later, cops walk in. Then I knew they were stalling me on all the time, that he was just waiting there, making sure I was there till the cops arrive. Anyway I still kept my cool and explained to them the reason why I was there. Half an hour goes by and I am still alone in the room with the cops talking to them. Cops are all the time outside talking to BB and not even bothering to listen to my story.

    In comes on of the cops, cuffs me (God that hurts) and then tells me that I was cuffed so that I wouldnt hurt anyone. Yeah right!. So here I am cuffed for the first time of my life and humiliated. Then they told me that I was being arrested for Fraud and that I am being taken to the Dekalb Office and a detective would take it up from there on. They brought me out amidst the whole store, but I kept my head high , because I hadnt done anything wrong and I had nothing to worry about.

    Cops took me on a joy ride for half an hour and it was a damn uncomfortable one. Once there, they took me to this holding pen alone and made me wait there. In comes one black lady, who looked far more reasonable and intelligent than all the three cops combined, and she told me that she is going to talk to the BB guy (Paul) first and then myself. I waited there for almost an hour (the whole thing took from 11:30 till 3:30) and then she came in and asked me for my story. I explained her everything. She tells me then that she does not believe BB's story that I forged the receipt. Looks like they first told her that the receipt was a Fraudulent one and that they have proof to that effect, but once we all got to the precinct changed the story saying that they cant prove it anymore. Also they changed the charge from Fraud to Criminal Trespass, though at no time whatsoever they had asked me to leave the store. I work as an Analyst for a firm in Atlanta and I was looking quite respectable in my work clothes. anyway, she told me that BB does not want me as a customer and I told her that I would be happy to take my business elsewhere.

    She told me that they had changed their tactics from "Forging the receipt" to "Trespassing - not leaving the store even when I were asked to". I told her that all the time the General manager Rod, wanted to keep me there so that the cops would come in, and never he asked me to leave the store. She sympathised with me and told me that she ended up warning the guy from BestBuy.

    So here I am Vindicated, Harassed, Ridiculed. Given up ? Hell no! I guess thats one thing you learn when you are a geek.

    1. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Atilla · · Score: 1

      all is well that ends well... even though you didnt get the card, at least this didn't end up in court.

      ...and BB is now on my list of places to not bother spending money at.

      --
      --- sig moved for great justice.
    2. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by hack0rama · · Score: 1


      You gotta sue the hell out of BestBuy for harassing you like this ! It is they who screwed up on price and now they blame customer for fraud ?

    3. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by ryants · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Things I would do if I were you:
      • Have the manager arrested for filing a false police report. See how he likes the cuffs.
      • Sue Best Buy for "damage to your reputation".
      --

      Ryan T. Sammartino
      "Ancora imparo"

    4. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Get a good lawyer and sue them for false arrest.
      Maybe a complaint to civil rights office in your state? Make 'em sorry they did that to you, as they had no cause at all.

    5. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by FatRatBastard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Spread the word far and wide (and honestly). Nothing will hurt more than the bad press Best Buy will recieve. Also, try taking the matter up to corporate. Chances are they'll be none too happy with what was done (and if they don't care then you've only lost some time and effort).

    6. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 2

      I think a false arrest and defamation of charecter (sound it out, my spelling is terrible) law suit would be appropriate. But then again IANAL.

    7. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by jmu1 · · Score: 2

      Get a lawyer. Expensive, yes. Get a webpage up, get a bunch of links to it... Best Buy would hate to have it's site be second on the list at google. That, now that is cheap. Put the two together and you'll be sending the first shot to the vendors from the angered masses of consumers who get screwed on a daily basis. Huzzah!

    8. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by jwbozzy · · Score: 1

      In today's legal system, there ought to be a way you can get some sort of reparations from them for your humiliation and all the crap they put you through. You can obviously prove that you had a legitimate receipt and are due a product. They cannot prove anything about what you did. Then again, they are a huge corporation, and are apparently very imaginative with their statements...

      --
      perl -e 'printf("mmm %x\n", 3735928559)'
    9. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Joshuah · · Score: 1

      cOdEgUru send me an email to voetsek_Eq@yahoo.com I live in the atlanta area and my brother in law is a dekalb officer. also, i have two new geforce ti 4600 cards im selling so ill cut you a deal or something, let me know,

      Voetsek_eq@yahoo.com

    10. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Lonath · · Score: 2

      As many other people have probably told you, don't say anything. Posting on an !corporate website like /. with your story may make it harder to get anywhere.

    11. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Simple solution...

      sue the ever living shit out of them.
      and be sure to get local media involved, name the Rod dude in the lawsuit also. (BB will bail on him if you offer to just sue Rod ouf of existance and make a public spectacle out of him)

      Get a lawyer, preferrably one that has good media ties to get this on the local news.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Mexican · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you say you printed the receipt off the BB site? If so, I wonder if this could be a issue for a federal court - IANAL, blah blah - but if the part of BB that is responsible for the site is in another state, maybe this is something that would be considered to have taken place "in interstate commerce". I once served on a federal grand jury, and the federal prosectors used any link, no matter how tenuous, to haul folks into federal court if the CRIMINAL charges looked like something worthy of federal charges. So you were enticed by something off a out-of-state part of the company(if this is true, and their web site shows a contact address in MN), you try to assert your rights to hold the local representatives of BB to that contract, and you get falsly arrested. While you are shopping for a lawyer, you might want to keep this in mind.

    13. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the store that did this to you?

      Northlake Ga (Store #513)
      4145 Lavista Rd northlake Square
      Tucker, GA 30084
      Phone: 770-939-7660
      Hours: Mon-Sat 10:00am-9:00pm
      Sun 11:00am-6:00pm

    14. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by terradyn · · Score: 1

      I also think you should consult a lawyer. If not, publicity is what we need. Contact the media. You can also create a webpage buy a google adword to it. I'm sure people will donate some money to keep the adword up so everytime someone searches for BestBuy they'll see your story prominently displayed to its right.

    15. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by geekoid · · Score: 2

      get a lawyer.
      Find out if criminal tresspas now on your record, if so demand it be removed or sue.
      Find out if its legal to hand cuff someone before arresting them in your state.
      Find out what your rights are in the specific situation.
      Sue best buy, make it loud and public.

      Law suits are the only way to get large agencys to follow LEGAL preceedure, not just policy procedures. They are also the only way to get corporations to change the way they do things and the ONLY way to hold them accountable.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      IANAL.

      "So I went to BB at Tucker,GA last Friday armed with the receipts, my original and the copies I printed from the site."

      I've never shopped off of their website. Do you get a copy of the receipt e-mailed to you as well? That would come in handy if you still had it.

      "There was this customer service lady who told me that six or seven people have been trying to PM with the same receipt there and its not possible."

      Any way you could find some of these other people so you could confirm each others' story?

      "Looks like they first told her that the receipt was a Fraudulent one and that they have proof to that effect, but once we all got to the precinct changed the story saying that they cant prove it anymore."

      It sounds like the police would currently have the receipt as evidence. Find out if they have it.

      If you were arrested for fraud and the person who had you arrested changed their tune, then that sounds like false arrest, or at the very least libel.

      Find out if the Best Buy folks gave the woman (detective?) you were talking to a sworn statement about asking you to leave. If they did they may have perjured themselves.

      Either way, step 1 of this is to get a lawyer and talk to them. Heck, they may even be coming out of the woodwork to find you as I type. :)

    17. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Lucabrasi · · Score: 1

      Definitely sue them!

      I actually know Cherian (kinda). I bought a DSL modem from him a little over a week ago. Really nice guy, no way he deserves this.

      If ya need a character witness about your business transactions let me know :)

    18. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      You know, it might be interesting to call this Best Buy and ask to speak to Rod. I'm not talking about cussing him out, but pretending to be a member of the press and asking him questions about the incident ("Hi, I'm _____ from Slashdot (like they'd know it's not a real news org) and I'd like to ask you a few questions about the recent arrest of Mr. Abraham. Is it true that you lied to the police?")

    19. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all the way supporting you also. Sue their asses to the ground. Add to what others said racial discrimination. That oughtta get their attention and hurt their pocket a little bit.

    20. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

      Thanks Buddy,

      Maybe I should sent you as the real LucaBrasi and this time maybe you would do some damage instead of getting strangled ;)

      Thanks a lot! I appreciate that. And hey, did you get the modem work yet ?

      And thanks once again.

    21. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Lucabrasi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, strangulation is no fun. :)

      I'll be in NYC Mon, line is already active so I'll let ya know. Powers on fine, I'm sure it's cool.

      Good luck!

    22. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you don't sue I'm going to get SO PISSED OFF at you it isn't funny.

      You need to sue on behalf of every wronged customer on the planet. You need to sue for triple damages based on the humiliation you suffered. You need to sue for wrongful arrest based on the false charges. You need to sue for illegal detainment. You need to sue for them being arrogant assholes.

      If people want to run a public business that's great. But there are laws the govern the operation of public businesses. Therefore those laws must be followed in order to continue running a public business.

      "Disclaimers" and "EULAs" do NOT supercede the law. Just for emphasis, I will repeat it several times. "Disclaimers" and "EULAs" do NOT supercede the law. "Disclaimers" and "EULAs" do NOT supercede the law. "Disclaimers" and "EULAs" do NOT supercede the law. "Disclaimers" and "EULAs" do NOT supercede the law. "Disclaimers" and "EULAs" do NOT supercede the law. "Disclaimers" and "EULAs" do NOT supercede the law. Only a signed waiver can remove someone from their lawful responsibilities and even that may not be enough.

      So how much should you sue for? $1M minimum. Maybe you won't get it... who knows... maybe it'll be $1M in store credit ;) hahaha... but SUE. The story doesn't end here. This will happen to more people than just you. This has happened to more people than just you. This country is shifting into a company-run nation. Business interests come before those of citizens. Hell, we're not even citizens any more... we're "consumers." If that's not an insult to your dignity as a human, I don't know what is!?

      SUE THOSE BASTARDS. You have to. DO NOT SETTLE out of court. DO NOT SIGN any agreements to "keep quiet" in exchange for money. It doesn't matter if the amount you sue for is more than you could have hoped to earn in two lifetimes. The point is to damage THEM, not to reward yourself. A company the size of Best Buy will not feel $90,000. It wouldn't even make their lawyers blink...let alone any of their accountants. Make it hurt to a level that will send a message to Best Buy and all other abusive retailers out there that each time they pull some crap like this, they run a serious risk not only of bad P.R. but of losing a whole lot of money.

      I'll be happy for you and very jealous when you collect your rewards, but the reward is not what you're suing for -- it's the damages. If they are not damaged by this, then you've lost... we've all lost.

      Okay?

      (Am I being too passionate about this? Nah.)

    23. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... Excuse me, but you tried to price match something with a receipt that you KNEW had the wrong price? In fact, that would be almost the same thing as using a fake receipt or advertisement.

    24. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      SUE THEM! They screwed your civil rights.

      Don't let them get away with this.

    25. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Linuxathome · · Score: 1

      Mod this comment up so Cherian can see! IANAL either, but if you can pull this case into Federal court, BB will most likely, try to settle rather than set foot in court. Risky play, especially if the little guy has to foot his lawyer fees for litigation in Federal court, but might be well worth it.

    26. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by gdyas · · Score: 2

      I don't know why, but in my mind this looks like an episode of "In the Heat of the Night".

      "They call me MR. ABRAHAM."

      --

      The only tool you've got against psychosis is experience.

    27. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IMHO you should have talked to a lawyer ASAP. There seem to be multiple crimes and torts here.
      1. False advertising. I urge you and the other victims to file complaints with the FTC. IANAL, but a class action lawsuit may be in order.
      2. Filing a false police report
      3. False arrest
      4. The failure of the police to question you prior to handcuffing and arresting you may also be actionable.
    28. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by krypteia · · Score: 0

      Get a lawyer then sue their ass. They slandered you. Period.

      --
      Spazdot-1 in 10 insightfull articles, and 1 in 10,000 insightfull comments ain't bad.
    29. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Mexican · · Score: 1

      Thanks Linuxathome - after further thought I wanted to elaborate a bit. To clarify, I don't know if Cherian has a strong enough case to merit a criminal prosecution but the key thing is the invocation "in interstate commerce", I think that even on the civil side it does not take much to prove that. On the criminal side on a grand jury, all it took to get an indictment was two criteria beyond that - one, that the case not be frivilous. Second, it has to be interesting - if it's something that would look good on the evening news, that's perfect. Given those two criteria, which do apply here, it seems grand juries were quite happy to accept even far-fetched connections to interstate commerce.
      Slightly OT - on the criminal aspect, grand juries are accused as being rubber stamp grand juries, and that is pretty valid because particularly on the federal side, the evidence was often so obvious - a guy gets caught with 1000 crack rocks in his trunk, well, duh, that is more than enough to send him on to a trial court. I only ever recall one case where we no-billed someone - a very green US Atty. brought a case before us (can't get into details) that was basically a instance of something looking criminal but was simply an omission on the defendant's part - but the USa was trying to get an indictment on everything short of treason. It was a load of BS even us bewildered normal citizens could see. We tore her a new hole for that, even complained to the lead attorney. It took a blatant disregard for the letter of the law for us to reject something - all the other cases resulted in indictments, even with skimpy evidence. Anyway the chances of getting something through a grand jury is not all that hard. It may be tossed out of trial court, but by then the damage is done - the defendant has the stigma of indictment forever. That's just something to keep in mind before pursuing the criminal angle; I would not advocate pursing a criminal charge just for an indictment. But then I was not falsely arrested for asserting my rights.
      Normally you would not get an attorney to back you on a criminal matter but if Cherian can get a refererral to a attorney who is very experienced in federal criminal code, well, all I am saying is in this country pretty much anything you do could be interpreted to violate some federal law somewhere. I mean, we have had federal laws criminalizing the removal of information tags from mattresses...

    30. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Am I being too passionate about this? Nah.)

      Indeed, one of the bigger things about an online forum is that you can get very emotional about it all. While I'd love to get those BB folks fry in hell, it's important to stop and muse about the legal costs involved for a moment.
    31. Re:Out of the woodwork :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the bulk of your post, Score5, but the country isn't just now being transformed into a corporate run enterprise......it's been that way for over one hundred years. I think it was Grover Cleveland who said that the business of America is business and that was in the 1890's.

  39. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was going to post exactly the same thing. Congratulations on being quicker to the draw. I was also going to add that there's one problem with that. At least one of the buyers called and confirmed twice that the offer and prices listed were valid. Any legal experts out there know how this will change things?

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  40. But is this really a surprise? by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 2

    Once again, Michael posts bullshit that is totally wrong.

    Tell it, brother. Of course, Michael was only following the Slashdot mission statement: 'Post bullshit that is usually totally wrong, and make sure it is done in the most misspelled and grammatically incorrect fashion possible'.

    'I'm tired of waltzing for pancakes.' - Gwen Mezzrow

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re:But is this really a surprise? by banuaba · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dumbasses, please read the article. The reason they should have to honor thier price is beacuse the advert said "GeFORCE CARD! 129.99! $200 SAVINGS!" or something to that effect. if the ad had just said Geforce card, 129.99, I'd agree with you, but the inclusion of the 200 savings bit indicates that it isn't a typo, it was intentional.

      --


      Brant

      Argle. Bargle.
  41. Re:JEWS by kcornia · · Score: 1

    Thank god we have Fry's out here on the left coast. I certainly don't go there to get advice on what to buy (their help is very not helpful), but when I know what I want (which is always) Fry's has what I want at good prices generally.

    Hell, I just walked out with Dungeon Seige for 29.99, a full 20 bucks off the price I saw it for elsewhere.

  42. Disclaimers can not supercede state or federal law by bani · · Score: 1

    ... no matter how much best buy would like to think so.

  43. My experience with Best Buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me: I want to complain...
    Manager: You want to complain? Look at these shoes. I only had them three weeks and the heels are worn right through.
    Me: Ugh.
    Manager: If you complain, nothing happens. You might as well not bother. And I'm sick and tired of this office.

  44. Re:My legal-sense is shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have no legal sense. You just made up a bunch of crap..

  45. Wrongful detention? by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 5, Informative

    At this point, I would call the local friendly legal professional. I bet he or she would be very happy to pursue a wrongful detention civil suit against Best Buy and its manager. Lawyers love this sort of case, especially when it's a little guy clearly in the right versus a big retailer. You get the chance to teach BB a lesson, see the manager get his ass fired, and you could get a nice little chunk of change for your trouble.

    And let us know how it goes. BB deserves the smackdown for this one.

    'I'm tired of waltzing for pancakes.' - Gwen Mezzrow

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re:Wrongful detention? by Wanker · · Score: 2

      I'll second this. On something this easy to win, even a good lawyer is likely to want to work on it without any cash up front.

      Best Buy has deep pockets, you have a LOT of support and corroborating evidence, and they get to play the race card.

      Shop around for a good lawyer-- they'll be drooling all over themselves to get a piece of this.

    2. Re:Wrongful detention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd second this too. Heck, just threatening to get the media involved should get some nice goodies.

      Of course, then you're possibly involved in something that grab media attention, drag on for a while, etc. Up to you if it's worth it. But I imagine you could get a fairly substantial cash settlement.

    3. Re:Wrongful detention? by Bilestoad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sometimes it's great to live in the land of lawyers. Talk to one, Cherian. If you don't wind up being offered an apology AND a video card I will be very, very surprised. Oh, and if your legal advisor OKs it, talk to your local newspaper too!

      "General Manager" Rod is going to be very sorry!

    4. Re:Wrongful detention? by LinuxLowRider · · Score: 0

      I totally agree, sue their arses to hell. I'm sure your local legal professional can come up with all kinds of reasons to take them to court.

    5. Re:Wrongful detention? by nick_davison · · Score: 2


      You could always sue for $800,000 in damages for emotional distress ($400 card x the 2000 or so screwed people) and just buy everyone the cards. :)
      </humor>

    6. Re:Wrongful detention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! please do this!

  46. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by tps12 · · Score: 2

    Still don't see that waiving any of BB's rights as stated in the disclaimer. It opens them to "false advertising" charges, but those have always seemed pretty anti-free speech to me. Anyone know if false advertising laws have been tested?

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  47. Why it's not a typo by Wanker · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the Best Buy consumer abuse site (before it gets Slashdotted back to the Stone Age):

    Here's a strange one... we found an Advertisement at BestBuy.com yesterday that proclaimed "VisionTek GeForce4 Ti4600 for Special Pre-Order Price of $129.00..the savings is a $200.00 Value". Normally a "typo" or mistake would be something to the effect of a misplaced decimal point or an accidental wrong price. It usually doesn't consist of adding terms like Special Pre-Order Price and savings is a $200.00 Value, ( since it sounds reasonable $129.00 + $200.00 savings for a card announced that day with no real set price yet ) all over the advertisement. So we did the right thing and CALLED. BestBuy.com confirmed the price of $129.00 twice, at which time they gave us the $200.00 value / saving quotes. After a whole day of ordering, they reneged on the deal and cancelled all orders. The money has yet to be refunded. I have made a sign-up page for all of you that placed orders with Best Buy so that we may get as many people taken care of as possible. I have been in contact with them all day....
    The evidence these folks have collected (scanned receipts, etc.) appears to be pretty damning for Best Buy. It will be interesting to see how badly Best Buy gets thrashed in court or if they just settle up and offer the cards at the price they advertised.

    1. Re:Why it's not a typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have a very good record with consumers.

      Personally, I had a bad experience with them just the other month. I was in the process of moving and went to the local Best Buy (in Phoenix on Camelback) to purchase a fridge. The cashier accidentally charges me $1900 instead of $700. She voided the order and apologized. The next day, I came back to buy a network cable, but the order didn't go through. I called my credit card number and found the $1900 charge was still pending. I explained that the void had been issued and got Best Buy to fax a confirmation, but somewhere between the two of them, the information wasn't being transferred correctly. It took three days of complaining to Best Buy and Bank One higher-ups to get my money back. In the meantime, I had NO money- at the worst possible time as my security deposit was due.

      When everything was cleared up, Best Buy refused to acknowledge any blame. They said paying with a debit/credit card meant I assumed the risk of being overcharged. They wouldn't even give me a gift certificate or a free #$*#ing network customer to ensure my customer loyalty.

  48. Unfortunately for you... by bani · · Score: 2

    ...state and federal law do not agree with you.

    the attorney general believes there is a case here.

    1. Re:Unfortunately for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AG for a single state. Big deal. They think there's a case for suing every corporation to make money for their state welfare programs, nothing new there. Remember the class action tobacco suit? ROFL

  49. Implying that now you do? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Which law is it that says they have to honor the order? They refunded your money because they were unable to complete the order. That is generally considered a fair business practice.

    The $20 credit is a bonus, they did not have to do that for ANY reason. That was simply to try to say "Look we messed up, heres 20 bucks off your next purchase."
    They don't owe you jack.

    Wait. Pretend you own a business. pretend you are building computers for someone. You price it out, but leave out a $500 part by accident. You take the guys money, and start building. A day later you realize your mistake. Are you obligated to provide it all to him? No.
    You can give back his money and cancel the transaction.

    1. Re:Implying that now you do? by Ravensfire · · Score: 1

      Bad example.

      Assuming when you took the guys money that the two of you signed a contract, listing out the specs of the computer - you're quite probably stuck.

      Especially if you're dealing with a reader of this site.

      --
      "But we decide which is right, and which is an illusion"
    2. Re:Implying that now you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True:

      You CANNOT, however, just "adjust" your charge to him by $500 dollars because "you know it'll be OK"

      You also definitely SHOULD not, when he comes back to your store and asks for his computer, detain him and attempt to arrest him for fraud. Or if you do, you SHOULD expect to get the living heck sued out of you and have to start looking for a new job. Hopefully one significantly less lucrative to you to teach you that being an a-hole WILL result in you having a miserable life.

    3. Re:Implying that now you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once ANY company has taken your money, they are
      now legally obligated to provide the product. They can only cancel the order if both parties agree. This happened at buy.com a year or so ago. They had a bunch of 19" monitors for dirt cheap and thousands of people ordered them. They actually charged the credit cards of everyone and then did a refund and cancelled the orders. A class action lawsuit was formed and buy.com lost. Once you take someone's money you're obligated to provide a product.

      If they had actually not charged the credit cards until they shipped the product, they would have been able to cancel the order in time and not had legal hassles, but they charged the cards immediately.

      I do not know whether best buy had actually charged peoples credit cards, but if they did, then they are legally bound, and will lose easily in court as there is enough precedents in this matter.

    4. Re:Implying that now you do? by cronik · · Score: 1
      Actually you call the guy up ASAP,and tell him you left off the part then give him the choice of

      a)canceling the order

      b)getting a computer without the part

      c)negotiate a new aggrement (and throw in a discount for the trouble)

      Now if part was on the invoice but you stated the wrong price? Then you are SOL and have to eat the cost. The honor the order bit is in most states civil codes. To sum up California BPC 17500.5 if it didn't say limited quantities then if ANYONE in California got it all all that were denied can get $50 dollars + damages. And that dosent count breach of contract.

      --
      Information wants to be free like speech wants to be free, not like we want beer to be free.
  50. Re: Jumping to conclusions by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 2

    Jumping to conclusions is a popular pasttime at Slashdot. The fact that the store confirmed the price to multiple people, and even actually sold the card at that price (supposedly) to a few pretty much eliminates any possibility that this was a typographical error on the website. You could argue that it was a general pricing error that somehow spread to all of the stores AND was posted to the website, but it certainly was not a typo.

    I also, however, do not believe that Best Buy is legally obligated to honor any price they posted. It's their store, and it seems to me that they can charge whatever they want at any time. (Whether this is morally right or not is irrelevant)

  51. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by enjo13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anti-free speech? Are you NUTS?

    Fraud is not protected speech, period. False advertising is a form of fraud, as it is an attempt to "trick" the buying public by promising goods or services in a misleading way.

    False advertising is very difficult to prove, however. Errors and unintentional ommisions are protected as just that, accidents. In order to win a false advertising suit you have to prove malicious intent.. and that's very very difficult to do.

    I'm not really sure what occured in this case. It seems like Best Buy made a listing error, and then refused to honor. That would put them well within their legal rights.

    --
    Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
  52. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by Ravensfire · · Score: 1

    I don't think there are any false advertising issues here. A price was advertised that was wrong. The error was discovered and corrected. Usually, false advertising covers things like lying about features of a product, the actual product sold and the usual bait and switch scams.

    Also, remember that an advertised price does not constitute an offer.

    -- Ravensfire

    --
    "But we decide which is right, and which is an illusion"
  53. IANAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but, if you are who you say you are, you should talk to a lawyer before talking to anyone else. There's a reason you hear "no comment" in disputes from parties on advice of their lawyer.

  54. Bling bling by kirkb · · Score: 1

    Lawsuit time. Don't worry, it'll never go to court, because the media loves to cover stories like this. You should get a pretty good settlement out of them.

    --
    Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
    1. Re:Bling bling by rhizome · · Score: 2

      The thing is that this would be the perfect opportunity *not* to settle and to get a trial judgement on them.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  55. Slashdot Employees Change Focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot employees, who have long maintained that correct spelling and grammar was optional for their jobs as editors, have announced that they will now act as paralegals. They have acknowledged that they are at least as qualified to dispense legal advice as they are to edit submissions.

  56. If true best buy did break the law. by systemaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Assuming what you said is true, then best buy did break the law. Its called "bait and switch" and that is illegal. Of course the hard part is proving that they intentionally showed the lower price to get people to come and spend more than that. Its more detailed than that, but the point is its illegal(I think in the US). It happend to me with a mail order place, had a duron w/ main board combo advertised in a magazine. I called them, 2 days after getting the mag, and they said the sale was over. and that by the time the magazine gets to peoples hands the sale is usually over...I said the words "sounds like bait and switch, thats illegal" 15 minutes later my stuff was ordered and on the way.

    --
    LinuxWorx
    Spelling errors are intentional as are gramatical error
    1. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by terrymr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've seen the bait and switch there before - I had an ad in my hand which showed a particular product at a large discount. Guess what - no product ... not even a spot on the shelf for it... the next day after the 1 day sale the product in question was on the shelf without a discount. When I asked about it I was told "We just had a delivery". However they declined to show me the paperwork showing they weren't in stock the previous day.

    2. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by seeken · · Score: 1

      Not to defend the ass holes at best buy (who lied to my friend and cost him 150 once) but...

      rain check

      --

      Surfing the net and other cliches...
      (Who Meta-Meta-Moderates the Meta-Moderators?)
    3. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by jvbunte · · Score: 1

      IANAL, however, I used to work for Best Buy and the I can tell you their official response will be "The Ad posting Price $xxx.xx is a guarantee of price, not availability." If you had requested a RAIN CHECK (they are required to give you one unless the ad specifically states "No Rain Checks Available") and that product becomes available at a later date you will get the sale price. It definately skirts the line on Bait and Switch however it is legal.

      --
      I think we'd all enjoy a nice cold beverage. -David Letterman
    4. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by chammel · · Score: 1

      Worst Buy does this bait and switch with their advertised specials as well. If you try to buy one of their advertised specials you will find that they only have 10 for the whole metro area and they sold out 2 days ago. I have been tricked into their store twice now. In nether case I bought anything.

      We as consumers have all the power, just refuse to do business with Best Buy. If they do not change their ways enough customers will bail and they will go out of business.

      --
      Neutrons are slippery little rascals, they can fool you. They can bounce and show up around corners you don't expect.
    5. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by terrymr · · Score: 2

      There were of course "no rain checks available"

    6. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

      I had similar problems on pricewatch with vendors advertising lower prices when the store was closed for the night and then raising them when they were open to accept orders. I thought about applying legal threats to get the advertised price because it was obviously bait and switch. But when it came down to it, I didn't feel like making a large purchase from a company I didn't trust. I mentioned my concern to a rep, when he did nothing to immediately resolve that concern, I hung up and purchased fomr a local store I trust and later reported the bad vendor to the BBB. A company that partakes in bait in switch is no better than the guy selling "As Is" parts from a dark booth at a computer show.

    7. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by spencerogden · · Score: 2

      Another option is to report the vendor to Pricewatch, they are pretty good about making their prices legit. For instance the tighter requirements on disclosing shipping cost they have had for the last 6 moths or so. It used to be that hardly any of the ads had shipping listed and shipping ended up being over $20 on a $100 purchase... for ground.

    8. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip... Failure to disclose accurate shipping prices was one of the main reasons I stopped shopping there. Just looking at the ads, I can see S&H is much better marked. What they ought to do is rank the items by full price (base price + max shipping) this way there would be no room for fooling around.

      Still though, I imagine many of the same vendors that used scum-like business practices to get ranked 1,2,3,4,5... are still among the top ranked vendors. Pricewatch is a great idea, and it's good to see they're weeding out some of the trash, maybe I'll give em another try in a year or two.

    9. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      rain checks almost always (prolly 99% of the time) apply only to in-stock items. that way, they take the item, tag it, and set it in the back room for you to come pick up later. that is what Wal-Mart did back in '98.

    10. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by nolesrule · · Score: 1

      You are confusing rain check with lay away.

      --
      -- nolesrule
    11. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, most of their computer "sale" items have rebates that last only as long as the sale. Even if you get a raincheck, the rebate ends before you see the item.

    12. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can try getting a raincheck, but rainchecks don't extend the rebates that only last a week that Best Buy uses for many of its sales.

    13. Re:If true best buy did break the law. by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      Its called "bait and switch" and that is illegal

      Not really. Bait and Switch is when a company advertises a product they don't have and then switch the consumer to another product. Your example was more like false advertising.

      This was most likely a mistake since it didn't sound like they tried to pawn another product on anyone.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  57. Best Buy = Best Fraud by rossz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Several months ago I my daughter spent her allowance on a game at best buy. When we got it home I installed the game and found it would not run (crashed on startup). This was on my wife's HP Pavilion (about as generic a consumer computer as you can find). I then tried it on my own computer, a bastard, self-built, multi-booting geek box from hell. Same exact problem, failed on startup.

    We went back to the store to exchange it for a different game. No chance. They will not exchange a game unless the media is damage, and then only for another copy of the same game.

    I spent far too long arguing with the manager. I pointed out that they would lose a regular customer over a $30 game. He would not budge.

    I have not been back to that store since then. So as not to disappoint my daughter, I let her buy another game (from a different store, of course) as it would have been cruel to tell her she lost her allowance.

    Unfortunately, this refusal to exchange software is a growing trend. Eventually, I will be forced to pirate all software for testing before I make an actual purchase.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by qurob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This has nothing to do with best buy

      It's like that at almost any store

    2. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by terrymr · · Score: 2

      This is illegal if your state has adopted the uniform commercial code which required that stores make refunds (not exchanges) of defective goods that the customer wasn't able to test before leaving the store - even if it is software.

    3. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by stretch_jc · · Score: 1

      I'd like to say this is uncommon, but after working at a computer store for almost 4 years I'd have to say this situation occurs every few days.

      The problem is that so many people try to run scams where they buy a game, burn it and then try to exchange it as defective. Basicly the way it normally works is to exchange the game for one of the same title, if it fails to install and run properly on a demo machine. If it fails to work we would normally test the new copy to make sure it work before we send them off. If it does the same thing again, normally we'd allow an exchange for a differant title.

      You seem like the kind of customer who drove me nuts while I was in sales (the ones who believes that there could never be a problem in your setup @ home, even though it works for me)

    4. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by ahoehn · · Score: 1

      If companies did accept software exchanges or returns every 14 year old that fancies himself a l33t warez hax0r would buy, copy, and return games. It's a nice idea, but it just wouldn't make sense.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    5. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As already mentioned, this has nothing to do with Best Buy - this is your problem with software that did not run on your PC. The defacto standard of software returns (and I do mean everywhere) is that if it is opened, you can exchange it for the exact same software, but not for any other title. That would have happened anywhere. And to state that a Pavilion is as generic as you can find, that may be true, but did you check compatibility with your Pavilion's components? Check online for a patch the game producer may have posted to correct the error? From what you posted, no you didn't -- it was automatically the store's problem. Dumbass consumer -- bane of the store's existence...

    6. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by Shadarr · · Score: 1

      EB has a 14 day return policy, no questions asked. I was in line behind a middle-aged guy and the clerk was explaining that if his son didn't like the game he could bring it back.

    7. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Electronics Boutique used to have such a policy; 'refund or exchange on any game, so long as all the bits are there, 10 days after purchase, no questions asked.' It was great; you could buy a game, and if it sucked, or you beat it in three days, or whatever, you could return it and get a new one. This was, of course, horribly abused, and is no longer their policy.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    8. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by CaptTrips · · Score: 0

      I recommend Electronics Boutique for all things video gaming related. Not only do you get an unconditional 15-day exchange/refund policy, but also their staff is professional and knowledge. If your a parent that's very important the next time you want to buy your child a game but aren't up to speed on what's the appropriate and not for young-ones.

      --

      grep >= ! == $your
    9. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by br0ck · · Score: 1

      EB Games has a 30 day, no questions asked return policy.

    10. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by Skyshadow · · Score: 2

      Let me get this straight:

      1. He purchased a product at a store.
      2. The product did not work as advertised.

      And what you're saying is that he's out of luck simply because some other people might break the law?

      That's bullshit. For starters, you just can't make your own rules based on the assumption that everyone's a crook -- in this case, refusing to refund money paid for a defective product. And I don't care what you say, if it doesn't work on a normal PC, it's defective in that case.

      Besides this, your typical /. geek arrogence is sickening. You shouldn't have to be overly fluent with computers just to buy a fucking video game. Consumers of computer programs deserve the same protections as any other consumers -- for instance, if you bought a new car that didn't run correctly, you're protected by lemon laws (they have to fix it in a certain amount of time or give you your money back). The same thing applys for all other areas of defective products. Why should software be so different?

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    11. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by Trekologer · · Score: 2

      The store can refuse to accept returns if they say that all sales are final. (or as-is). They can also refust to accept returns of products that you opened (ala the typical no return of software if you opened it).

      However the products that they sell must at least work. The EULA that says that the software has no warrantee or guarantee of fitness or merchantability (legaleeze for "if it doesn't work, screw you") is between you and the publisher. It is not between you and the store. If the store sells you a product that is defective and not disclaimed to be as-is, they are required to do something about it.

      I purchase pratically everything with credit card because of the protections that credit cards give you. You can contest a charge if the product you were sold was defective and the merchant wouldn't remedy the situation, even if you signed the sales slip.

    12. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Unfortunately, this refusal to exchange software is a growing trend. Eventually, I will be forced to pirate all software for testing before I make an actual purchase. "

      Actually, the 'no exchange' policy on software used to be *the standard* for any place that sells games. EB, Software etc, Babbages, Kmart, EVERY PLACE had that policy. I think that's been lifted fairly recently. EB will now let you return games (at least the one by where I live...) Should Best Buy back down on that policy? Yeah, I think they should. And I'm sorry that you had a problem with them. They're worried that people'll buy the game, copy it, and then return it. That's gotten a lot harder to do these days, but I think there's still concern out there. Come to think of it, I think there were legal reasons they had to do that. It's been a few years since I had a job that sold software, anybody remember what I'm talking about?

      On non-software items, Best Buy has a very liberal return policy. You have 30 days to return something (again non-software), satisfaction guaranteed. Plus they'll refund the difference if it goes on sale elsewhere. I found that *extremely* valuable when I bought a video camera. (*Note: This wasn't at Best Buy, it normally would have been, though.) It really sucks when you have too many choices, heh. I just wanted to buy a camera, find out if it did what I wanted, and then find the cheapest price.

      I would personally recommend that you never buy software from Best Buy again, but I wouldn't say boycott the whole store over it. Their software return policy may stink, but there are a ton of other benefits from buying from Best Buy. For example, you can order something from the web and return it to a store if something's wrong with it. That alone makes me more likely to shop there for stuff I need at the office.

      As for what you said about pirating games to see if they work, I wouldn't recommend that. But it is *always* a good policy to download a demo of a game before buying a copy. I realize as an impulse buy that's not always an option, but the problem with PC's as gaming platforms is that they're so varied you never know if it'll work or not. Usually the demo'll give you a good idea if it'll work or not. (Plus you'll find out if the game's any good!) The problem with 'pirating' it is that you not only have a high risk of getting a virus, but if the software doesn't work it's highly probable that's the result of a crack.

      BTW, I just wanted to comment that I appreciate you buying your daughter another game. It really sucks learning a lesson when you're a kid. I think that was a wonderful thing that you did for her.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      This gives me a great idea. I don't know how implementable it is from a technical standpoint, but it's a good idea. My idea is a way for people to buy software, take it home and test its compatability before opening the shrinkwrap.

      Even though most software lists the OS and hardware requirements on the box, most people don't necessarily know what's in their system (especially average Best Buy shoppers). I propose including a floppy disk attached to the outside of the box in a plastic envelope. The floppy disk could run a systems check to say with some certainty whether or not the software will work in a given system.

      As proof of record, the floppy could generate some sort of compatability certificate or a statement saying the software is incompatible with a given computer. If the software is incompatible, the consumer can return the *unopened* software package. Of course, if he opens the package despite failing the compatability test, then that's tea & sugar.

    14. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By chance, you may want to try and figure out what kind of copyright protection they are using on the CD. I know I had a HELL of a time getting Civilization3 to work before I found out it was using copy protection algorithms on the CD to prevent you from booting without the CD in the drive. Problem is, in Win2k, Infogrames' 3rd-party copy protection software wasn't recognizing my CD-drive, and thus, not even booting up, even though I had paid the full $49.95 for the game.

      I had to go to GameCopyWorld to find a ripped version of the main executable just to use my legally paid for game. What a crock!

    15. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      This guy is either a complete moron or a troll who is good at his job. Not for months on slashdot have I seen a troll that is this good.

      Unfortunately, this refusal to exchange software is a growing trend. Eventually, I will be forced to pirate all software for testing before I make an actual purchase.

      This statement is the proof of trollness. It is incredibly obvious to ANYONE who has ever bought a copyable medium that you can not return it, or illegal use copying would be thru the roof. Note: Illegal use copying: making a copy of something to which you do not posess the origional. I'm all for open source and fair use and hate the copy proof CD's, etc. but - This is just COMMON SENSE. You can't buy a CD and rip it and expect to be able to return it.

      Now, in your case, you claim the software didn't work. OK, well, there's not much you can do. It's sold as is. If you don't want to believe that, look on the back of your reciept. Now, granted you had a special case, but they have no way to know that.

      The rest of us deal with this, understanding the implications. I bought the girlfriend a copy of The Sims: Hot Date for christmas, and it didn't work on her 233 Mhz laptop, unlike the Sims and all the other expansion packs (she's a big fan). So, guess what? I built her a computer for her birthday in february. I can't ask them to take it back because it didn't work...

      Now:
      TO BEAT THE SYSTEM:
      Claim the software was defective, and exchange it for the same title. Then, the next day, go in and return the un-opened software that you exchanged the opened, "damaged" software for, using the origional reciept, which you should still have. Or get a friend to do it for you.

      ~z

      --
      sig?
    16. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by Zeio · · Score: 2
      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    17. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by rossz · · Score: 2

      Nice retort. You saved me the trouble of saying it myself. In fact, your statement applies equally to the wanker who called me a troll. Yeah, some people steal software. I don't.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    18. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by rossz · · Score: 2
      BTW, I just wanted to comment that I appreciate you buying your daughter another game. It really sucks learning a lesson when you're a kid. I think that was a wonderful thing that you did for her.

      What could I do? I challenge anyone to look in an eleven year old girl's eyes and say, "The store ripped you off, you lost your allowance, life sucks." Excluding Best Buy managers, since they are professional assholes.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    19. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by rossz · · Score: 2

      I'm not a moron, and I'm not a troll. You, on the other hand are a complete moron AND a troll. Your opening sentence is proof of your trollness. What you say afterwards proves your stupidity.

      For your information, I have purchased copyable medium and returned it, just not at Best Buy.

      Stores generally can not sell NEW merchandise "as-is". There are certain legal requirements pertaining to "fitness of product". If something is adverstised as being able to do something, then it damn well better be able to do it. No, don't bother pulling out a standard EULA (or the back of a recipt). The courts have already said those are overriden by the point-of-sale contract laws.

      Legally, I could have sued and won, economically, it wouldn't make sense to do so over a $30 game. Instead, I eat the $30 and find a business who actually gives a rat's ass about customer satisfaction.

      As for your suggestion to beat the system. Won't work. They mark up the receipt to prevent you from doing exactly that.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    20. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by greening · · Score: 1

      I've never had these kinds of problems with Best Buy. I have had their service plans shoved down my throat before. I am quickly loosing faith in Best Buy though. A friend of mine bought some software from them and one item he purchased was defective (crashed on startup, like you said) and they ran it on a computer there (Best Buy did) and it agian wouldn't install. And they gave him a full refund...

      et al, Glenn Murphy

      --
      Are you telling me that you don't see the connection between government and laughing at people? - Interviewer
    21. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      This statement is the proof of trollness. It is incredibly obvious to ANYONE who has ever bought a copyable medium that you can not return it, or illegal use copying would be thru the roof. Note: Illegal use copying: making a copy of something to which you do not posess the origional. I'm all for open source and fair use and hate the copy proof CD's, etc. but - This is just COMMON SENSE. You can't buy a CD and rip it and expect to be able to return it.
      You're so full of shit, your sideburns are brown.

      HMV will refund your money if you bring back a CD, no questions asked.

    22. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by dswensen · · Score: 2

      One of the software outlets where I live (it's a major one) has a seven-day return policy on all software. I rarely return software, but when I do, they take it back, no muss, no fuss.

      It's actually one of the major reasons I buy from them instead of Best Buy. So, yeah, in some cases, it does have quite a lot to do with Best Buy and how they do business.

    23. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jee-zus. Why is this still a fucking 2? Someone mod this unbearable buffoon down.

    24. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by seann · · Score: 1

      I used to work at Radioshack in Canada(TM), and whenever we'd get a person who wanted to return a piece of computer software, we'd fire it up on a computer, install it, and check if it ran.

      If it ran, we would not take it back. If it did not run, we would take it back.

      That is fair.
      Just not taking it back, is not. If the game had an obvious defect in the disk, we'd swap disks with a new one, send the other for repair.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    25. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by Australian+werewolf · · Score: 1

      O Bin Laden is stupid. Instead of the WTC, he should have crashed the planes into Disneyworld, Hollywood and Redmond.

      People making "funny" sigs like yours make me sick. I happen to live in Redmond, and I don't appreciate you telling the world that you wish my home should have been the target on 9/11.

      If you don't like Microsoft then don't buy their products. If you don't like Hollywood then don't watch their movies. If you don't like Disney, don't go there and don't watch their shit either.

      This may be off topic, but the inflammatory sig deserved it.

    26. Re:Best Buy = Best Fraud by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

      If you don't like my .sig, don't read it.

  58. Buy.com had a similar controversy 3 years ago. by RyanFenton · · Score: 2


    Old, but very similar article on the buy.com story.

    About three years ago, I put in an online purchase for a very nice 19" Hitachi monitor for $165. The normal price for that monitor was some $400 higher. About 1,400 other people did the same thing, and a few even recieved their monitors - but the rest had their orders cancelled.

    Since the company had selectively not honored many purchases, after putting the hold on their customer's money, a class action law suit was launched. About two years later, I revieved a small settlement check. I feel a bit of shame for playing a small role in continuing the litigious trend in the nation - but hopefully more companies will take closer note of their mistakes, so they have to honor fewer accidental low prices.

    Similarly, they had also cancelled between 15,000-19,000 Celeron 300 processors, which was another big part of the story, as many others would likely recall.

    :^)

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Buy.com had a similar controversy 3 years ago. by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 2

      I was in college for that one. A whole bunch of guys on my floor ordered multiple monitors; I think someone might have even actually got a few. I can almost guaranteee you, though, that the Buy.com incident was NOT a mistake. They took in thousands of dollars in orders they had no intention of shipping, and deliberately took their time about refunding the money. Companies like that deserve to be sued out of existence.

  59. Why can't you by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2
    Why can't you sue them for the difference? And in a state with consumer protection laws that provide for 2X/3X damages, you can get that. If punitives are available, you may be able to get more.


    The person who was arrested will get lots of money.

    1. Re:Why can't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and you will pay for that settlement every time you buy something at BB.
      Don't buy anything there ?
      Sure, you will still pay for the insurance rates are going sky-high because of countless litigations.
      You are simply victim of your own stupidity.

  60. Apologise for the error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I apologise for the error in the URL in my last post, the correct url for the BestBuy information is http://hypothermia.gamershardware.com/articles/bes tbuy_gf4deal.html As I stated before, PLEASE read this page before posting.

  61. Granholm in Michigan by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 3, Interesting

    will StaPle their balls to the wall. she has been the biggest advocate for price laws in Michigan since she took office 4 years ago.

    if you are getting screwed and you call her office, in a week that store will have an investigation going on its butt and a lot of the time they get taken to court.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:Granholm in Michigan by cOdEgUru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dude,

      Could you send me her contact info. I would love to talk to a good lawyer and I havent decided on which one yet.

      Thanks

      Cherian

    2. Re:Granholm in Michigan by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      she is the Atourny General...sorry, Just realized that I did not make that clear. :-p

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:Granholm in Michigan by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

      But could I file a complaint to her office, since this happened in Georgia ??

      I am sorry, this is my first civil law suit :)

    4. Re:Granholm in Michigan by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      no, you have to go through your Atourny General's office in Georgia. any on ein Michigan though should fle a compliant.

      and if the Atourny General does nothing, do not vote for him/her next time. it is there job to protect the consumer.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    5. Re:Granholm in Michigan by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

      I live in Michigan.

      That's so very true, she rocks.

      She ESPECIALLY likes going after telemarketers who call you back, after you've told them to add you to their 'do not call' (DNC) list.

      --
      -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
    6. Re:Granholm in Michigan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she is my next gov. thats for sure.

  62. well by mnordstr · · Score: 2

    "It's Best Buy's obligation to make sure their prices are accurate."

    Unless they have said something like we do not take any responsibility of typos in prices, blahblah...

    1. Re:well by GodHead · · Score: 2

      "Unless they have said something like we do not take any responsibility of typos in prices"

      Right! Because no evil, money hungry, souless corporation would ever mis-use the public's ignorance of the legal system like that.

      So... uh, you wanna buy a bridge?

      --
      Just wait till some crappy band steals your nic.
  63. And Malda thinks the user comments are worthless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  64. Re:Wah, wah...I was *humiliated* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhhh, you've had lots of experience with being handcuffed I take it? Guess you are just jaded with it at this point like all good criminals.

  65. That's not the point, moron. by Lendrick · · Score: 2

    He'd done nothing wrong, so they never should have cuffed him in the first place. It's one thing for the police to cuff someone who actually committed a crime, but it's quite another for them to cuff and publicly arrest an upstanding citizen who's done nothing wrong.

    That said, the police were just doing their job--however, the Best Buy manager should never have made that false report in the first place. It should never have happened. It's that simple.

  66. what the hell is there problem by Datasage · · Score: 1

    Thier just making the situation worse by not pricematching. I tend not to buy stuff from Best buy anyway unless it something i need now and cant wait for shipping. They do have good deals on new games once and a while i'll admit that.

    On an off topic note... i happen to live right across the street from the new best buy HQ. Because of it size they have to redo a nearby bridge to a freeway to accomade the potential traffic.

    --
    In America we are imprisoned by our fear of them.
  67. Worst Puchase (ever) by Neutropia_1 · · Score: 1

    I know exactly how that guy feels. Back in high school I used to work for BB (WB - whatever you want to call them shiesters)....

    Needless to say after about 2 years of loyal service they canned my ass - claiming I swore to a couple of customers on two different occasions in the course of a one week period.

    My guess is because I "insulted" the manager in front of some customers - which was far from the truth.

    Best Buy has been screwing customers over with their stupid bait and switch crap for awhile now. And I can't believe what their "disclaimer" says about how they have the right to cancel orders.

    That's not what I learned in Buisness law back in college....the "contract" that was entered by Best Buy and the people who purchased the cards BY LAW must be honored - heck, they even went as far as to charge their credit cards! I can't believe that in this day and age companies are still trying to get out of their fuck ups.

    Just look at canon and their fiasco with the digital cameras...They ended up selling them for what they advertised in the first place....Why waste a lengthy court battle and just concede that they're wrong and give in. Either way they stand to lose money on the deal, just less if give up a lost cause.....

  68. Other Issues by Tadrith · · Score: 1

    Not only does Best Buy like to screw over their customers, I'm very sick of their receipt checking policy as well.

    I recall reading some time ago that stores cannot legally check your receipt at the door, unless they are acccusing you of stealing. Once purchased, the item becomes your private property, and much like the items contained in a woman's purse, cannot be searched whenever they feel like it.

    Now, normally this isn't a problem. When I walk by, I simply ignore the man at the door, or tell them "No, thank you." when they ask for my receipt. One particular time, however, the man at the door simply refused to let me by. We got into a very heated discussion over it, and in the end he simply said "It's my job, I have to do it."

    I guess what I'm really asking, is if anyone knows of any resources for laws regarding stores and consumers? I don't want to look through tomes of law books, but I would like to find what the law actually states. I intend to go back to the store, and sit down with the manager and have a discussion regarding their employee and their bag searching policy.

    1. Re:Other Issues by shiffman · · Score: 1

      IANAL. But this has come up many times in regard to Fry's Electronics, where the employees at the door checking receipts are referred to as The Final Indignity.

      Anyway, according to the Answer Line column in the San Jose Mercury News, stores like Fry's have no legal right to stop you unless they have reasonable suspicion of theft. And all the times I've walked right by, often bypassing a line of sheep waiting to surrender their dignity, I've only had an employee try to stop me once. Verbally.

      By the way, again according to the Merc, membership stores like Costco do have the right to stop you. It's one of the rights you sign away when you become a member.

    2. Re:Other Issues by Tadrith · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information, it's helpful.

      The main reason this is an issue, is because my local Best Buy has the same guy at the door constantly. After getting into it with him, I now have an incident any time I go in. Normally I'd stop shopping, but there are no alternatives near my location. It is my intention to find the actual laws that state this, and have a long talk with his manager about his attitude toward the customers.

      Normally I can walk by without an issue, too, but now it's become personal. :P

    3. Re:Other Issues by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Yup. If you didn't sign anything to gain admission to the store, they have no legal ability to search you, unless they press theft charges. And feel free to laugh at any signs that say things like 'we reserve the right to search all bags, purses, blah blah blah' becuase, well, it's REALLY REALLY hard to reserve a right that one never had in the first place. And if they try to stop you, threaten to call the cops, just pull your cell phone and calmly announce that you're calling 911, in an attempt to stop a threatened assault. If they want to search your clothes, even a jacket, tack the word 'sexual' on there.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  69. The Tucker store stinks by jkinney3 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Welcome to the Tucker Best Buy. Now take your business elsewhere.

    I have had problems with that store as well. That manager, in fact. They must be desparate for ANYONE to work there as a manager to keep that bozo.

    I was also accused of attempting to defraud them when I tried to return som RAM that wouldn't work in an IBM Aptiva. (Picky box, Crucial ram worked fine). He told me they didn't even sell the brand I was returning. I had purchased it less than 30 minutes earlier! When I tried to get him to look in the locked case where the ram is so he could SEE THE SAME BRAND, he ordered me out of the store.

    I am no longer a customer. I will not EVER be customer again. I go out of my way to tell anyone who will listen to my story just how crappy of a store Best Buy, and the Tucker store in particular is.

    I vote for quality business with my money. Best Buy would eventually go out of business if it were not for the hourdes of people willing to tolerate crap for service where they shop.

    1. Re:The Tucker store stinks by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2

      hey look, google will give out addresses:
      here's one that might be of interest.... :)

      --
      US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    2. Re:The Tucker store stinks by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

      I would apprecaite it if you could send me an email with your contact info. This incident definitely adds spice to our latest fiasco..

      email it to cabraham@forestexpress.com

      Thanks

    3. Re:The Tucker store stinks by laststraw · · Score: 1

      I want to second that.... That Tucker store sucks. Never have rebate coupons, service is terrible... I hope they go down!

    4. Re:The Tucker store stinks by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      IANAL, I just watch a lot of Law & Order. :)

      "When I tried to get him to look in the locked case where the ram is so he could SEE THE SAME BRAND, he ordered me out of the store."

      At the very, absolute least call up your local Better Business Bureau.

      Store policy on returns is clearly stated on the signs in the store. If they go back on their printed policy, sue their pants off.

      If you paid with cash, you're up a creek. If you paid with a check, check fraud comes to mind. Best option: if you paid with a credit or debit card and it was less than 60 days ago, call up the card's issuer and talk about a chargeback. That will get corporate's attention in a hurry.

    5. Re:The Tucker store stinks by The_Rook · · Score: 1

      jkinney3 said

      "I have had problems with that store as well. That manager, in fact. They must be desparate for ANYONE to work there as a manager to keep that bozo."

      maybe that manager should look for a job at fry's.

      --
      when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
    6. Re:The Tucker store stinks by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      Or perhaps that manager should look for a job asking "Would you like fries with that?"

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    7. Re:The Tucker store stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol rob, trolls shut up week? slashdot has really been going too far lately, aside from ignoring its users it has been doing a lot of censorship lately. go look at that great review of Revolution OS and notice all the 0 and -1 "troll" comments about VA Linux funding the movie.

      see you at arml

    8. Re:The Tucker store stinks by Svartalf · · Score: 2

      "maybe that manager should look for a job at fry's."

      Hell, I've gotten better treatment from the Arlington, TX Fry's and the Garland, TX Fry's.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    9. Re:The Tucker store stinks by dsl · · Score: 0

      I've got a chargeback going through the system with one of the Memphis locations right now. On 17 March, I tried to sign the register receipt on paper instead of on their we-have-your-signature-available-forever box, as recommended by privacy activists everywhere and as I had done multiple times at multiple Best Buys including the one in question. Untrained register person claimed an inability to clear the transaction without "something" in the box. I argued over this for a good five minutes, but register person was adamant in her incompetence and store management was nowhere to be found, so I eventually consented to write "VOID". Made it clear that I was doing this under protest, and most distinctly not purchasing the item in question. This appeared to have gotten through register person's thick skull, as she left the security plastic on the item and suggested I talk to Customer Service if I still wanted to make a purchase. Customer Service refused to understand what part of the transaction was the least bit objectionable, so I left, believing myself to have wasted nothing but time. However, my bank statement clearly showed a charge for that item. The bank and Visa are being polite but noncommital so far, but given that the only signature Best Buy has - and which they should be able to call up fairly quickly in their accursed system - is the word "VOID", I would think that my case is pretty solid. It's only $55, so I'm willing to wait a while for Visa to set things right.

      --
      I refuse, on principle, to have a .sig.
    10. Re:The Tucker store stinks by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      Hell I've returned two items to the Garland Fry's just because I didn't like them when I got them home. No defects or anything. I had no trouble with the returns, aside from the fact that its a time consuming process.

  70. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The accepted usage refers to ethnic groups who were here in the pre-European period, not to people just born here afterwards.

  71. wrong by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2
    It would be abuse of process, malicious prosecution, and defamation.


    Then you can add in fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, and RICO.

  72. Standard business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I missing something here? This stunt sounds like a standard business 101 loss-leader.

  73. I called them, I encourage you to to the same... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I just contacted their customer service department at 1-888-237-8289 and I encourage you to do the same.

    I told them that they have lost a customer and that I will be telling everyone I know about this issue and encouraging them to boycott all BestBuy stores. I told that that I will continue to encourage others to boycott until Best Buy:
    1) Offers an immediate and formal apology from the president of their company to Abraham Cherian. It should be prominently displayed on the front page of their website and be accompanied with a press release.
    2) Contacts the Tucker/Dekalb county law Public Safety Department responsible for the arrest and instructs them to drop all changes against Abraham Cherian.
    3) Properly honor all existing valid orders for the disputed card.
    4) Immediately terminate Rod Hill's employment at Best Buy #513
    5) Immediately terminate the employment of any manager above Rod Hill who may have instructed employees to take the kind of action Rod Hill took.

    I hope that Abraham Cherian has already spoken to an attorney and is perusing both Best Buy and the county for the improper handling of this incident. I suspect he won't need the discount after this series of events.

  74. Outrageous searching by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 1

    The thing that really ticks me off about Best Buy, and definately makes me avoid them like the plague is they manner in which they treat their "customers" like criminals.

    If you try to walk out of the door, be prepared to be next to strip searched. They post huge bouncer type dudes in front of the door and ransack through people's jackets and clothes before they will let them leave.

    They don't do this because they have any probable cause, they simply do it to random people. Even people who just left the cash register 5 feet away from the door with a bag in their hand.

    Best Buy's assumption that everyone is a thief and a criminal is so reprehensible that it makes me sick everytime I go in there and see them doing it.

  75. Alternative to a lawyer by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    Contact your local TV station. Most have customer help people and love to make examples of companies over the 6:00 newscast. It's great for the because they get a free news story, look good helping the embattled little guy, and can sell a feel-good story in the in-news-advertising. That, and they usually get you just what you wanted.

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
    1. Re:Alternative to a lawyer by xantho · · Score: 1

      Like Clark Howard. That guy's on the ball. He'd have a field day with this.

      --Xantho

  76. To make it work . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    delete the space between the letters s and t in bestbuy

  77. Re: Seriously, it wasn't a typo by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

    READ the links. The store confirmed the price as $129 and quoted the $200 savings part. On different occasions.

  78. Its not only BB that does things like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a Sony DVD last year from Good Guys here in San Jose. Then one week later circuit city lowered the price from $399 to $299. I went back to Good Guys and asked them to honor their "double the difference" price guarantee. Of course they decided that they couldn't give me $200 store credit and I argued with them for quite a while. They informed me that I had to give them an add with the price. It didn't matter that this was the new regular price..... They wouldn't even call Circuit City to verify the lower price. So I decided to return the player at Good guys and then I ended up buying it at Circuit City instead. Too bad for them, since now I am looking at setting up my home theatre and I know who I WON'T be buying anything from.

  79. Why I don't buy at Best Buy anymore. by TheViffer · · Score: 2

    They have been doing this bait and switch for years. Nothing new here.

    Personally this spring was the final straw of why I will not do business with them.

    They had memory advertised cheap plus a mail in rebate. Bought the memory, and sent in the rebate. Low and behold they "lost or never received" two rebate forms (one for me, one for my fiance) Interesting thing was that was right before memory prices decided to go back up again. So I am "out" $80 because of these thiefs.

    Bottom line, Worst Buy is a company to stay far, far away from, and it makes me feel dam good to hear negative publicity against them.

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  80. Best Buy Rain Checks Blow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    I wasted about 15 minutes every two days for about two weeks calling to check up on the status of a rain check for a USB Hard Drive about a year ago. I never was able to get it.

    Fuck them, I hope you sue them and win big.

  81. Laws that don't exist. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    These are the two things I keep hearing over and over in the retail business. Store policies are so common now that people think these things are law. They are not.

    1) You can return most goods to the store for a full refund (sometimes with stipulations about whether or not it's been opened, unpacked, etc)

    - This is false. A merchant is under no obligation to return your money and take back an item, even if it's unopened. A sale is a sale. No law requires this. Stores have policies allowing such returns for good customer relations, not for the law.
    The only exception to this is if the goods are sold under false pretenses, or are defective. If it's not what the store said it was, or doens't do what they said it would do, the sale is fraudulent, and they have to return your money.

    2) Stores have to honor advertised prices, or mis-labeled prices on items.
    No, they do not. Again, most stores do this as a matter of good customer relations, but they are not required to by law. Fraudulent advertising IS illegal, and if you can show they are deliberately doing false advertising, then they can be sued (but that doesn't necessarily mean they have to honor the price)
    A grocery store honoring a dollar-too-low advertised price on a pack of noodles may lose some money over the week, but its'a small margin business, and customer loyalty is very important. A couple bucks loss per customer for a day or two is no big deal, and worth it to keep the customer who shops in your store every week for 10 years straight.

    A $200 loss per customer IS a big deal, especially in a business with little customer loyalty.

  82. I would never hire you, you trespasser! by gosand · · Score: 5, Funny
    Yeah, I heard about you - harassing the good folks at Best Buy. You, sir, are a troublemaker, and I would never hire you as an analyst because of that. We don't like your kind around here.

    (there, your reputation has now been damaged - feel free to sue Best Buy for false arrest and damaging your reputation)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  83. I *AM* an Indian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me respond in my native tongue:

    OOOOH boo boo boo
    OOOOH boo boo boo
    OOOOH boo boo boo

    Ugh. Heap fast video card offered for little wampum.
    Brave's heart sing at $200 clams off GForce4.
    Ugh.
    Heap bad Best Buy had Indian arrested.
    Bad. Very Bad.
    Me no smoke peace pipe.
    Braves gather. War council convened.
    This means war. No cavalry left. Indians run wild like buffalo in mating ritual.

    Ooooh boo boo boo
    ooooh boo boo boo
    ooooh boo boo boo

  84. Contact Info? by enjo13 · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all. I do several thousand dollars worth of business with Best Buy every year. I can't find a good place to send my complaints, so if anyone has one.. I'd like to hear it:)

    --
    Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    1. Re:Contact Info? by PotPieMan · · Score: 1

      Best Buy Co., Inc.
      PO Box 9312
      Minneapolis, MN 55440-9312
      Tel: (952) 947-2000

      Ask for their "customer satisfaction" phone number.

  85. Have your attorney deal with them by ikeleib · · Score: 1

    Intentionally lying to the police is a criminal offence. I also suggest hiring a friendly legal professional. Most people/companies behave a differently after they have been served papers.

  86. Best buy doesn't give a S*** about customers by terrymr · · Score: 2

    I have a number of bad experiences with best buy from refusing to honor any kind of warranty of defective goods to bait & switch scams with sales. And even on thanksgiving trying to avoid giving me the sale price on an item because the 45 minuts I spent in line took me past the end of the sale (at noon). The attitude of the management seems to be "Yes we know we're wrong - but you don't have the time or money to sue us".

    1. Re:Best buy doesn't give a S*** about customers by cybercrap · · Score: 0

      I used to work at best buy last aug till october and I quit because of this exact reason. They pressure us sales people to sell service plans and accessories. That is all they care about. They push us and push us to get everybody a service plan when we know they are bullshit. I can understand them wanting us to mention it, but they train us to force feed the service plan to them. I say fuck best buy.

  87. Deux Ex "Special Limited Edition" by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    Heh,

    Recently had a bad experience with the local Best Buy in San Diego. The only thing I like about Best Buys are their gigantic bargain bin section, where they put two old (~1999) games in a new box and sell em for 10$. I've bought a couple cheap games that way and have been generally happy with the practice.

    Then, over Spring Break, (looking for something to do while all my friends were off doing fun stuff) I buy Deus Ex off the bargain bin section for 10$. It's marked as a "Special Limited Edition", with no explaination of what a special limited edition is, precisely. (I looked.) I figured it meant it didn't come with a manual, or maybe multiplayer.

    So I figure 10$ for a game that was supposedly pretty good is a good deal, so I buy it. Take it home. Play it for a while. Get halfway through the game. Splash screen comes up: "Buy Deus Ex, game of the year for 2000! If you buy the real version, you will get to see all these nifty features..."

    Bah. Fricken Best Buy sold me a DEMO for 10 dollars!

    Maybe I should have guessed that "Special Limited Edition" meant "demo", but all the other games I've bought from their bargain bin have been the real thing. Deceptive as hell.

    -Bill Kerney

    1. Re:Deux Ex "Special Limited Edition" by arkanes · · Score: 2

      They do this at EB, too - there's a rack of demo games, generally for a couple bucks each. However, they aren't clearly labeled as demos, I had to ask a sales rep what they were and why they were so cheap.

  88. Few things you should do now by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As always, this does not consitiute formal legal advice, get a lawyer in your jurisdiction for advice.

    First off, get a lawyer. Once of the nice ambulence chasing kind. If they like the case, and they probably will, they should do it for a split of the settlement. Of course nothing is ever sure in the court system, but juries are generally sympathetic to cases of consumers suing big corperations for being assholes.

    Next, I would talk to your DA about possable criminal charges against the manager. It sounds like he knowling lied to the police to have you arrested, and that's illegal.

    Finally continue to do what you are doing now, which is to spread the word. Bad press hurts the company immensly.

    1. Re:Few things you should do now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Next, I would talk to your DA about possable
      >criminal charges against the manager. It sounds
      >like he knowling lied to the police to have you
      >arrested, and that's illegal.

      If anything about this story is true (I have my
      skeptical doubts) It's Federal Pound-me-in-the-Ass
      for Twenty Years Illegal.

      Cops do NOT appreciate being lied to. They WILL make your life hell because of it.

  89. Another fun story by Milo77 · · Score: 1

    I while back my friend had a not so fun run-around with BB. Here is the letter he evetually sent them (kinda long, but so was the ordeal):

    Dear Mr. Schulze,

    I'm writing to bring your attention to a problem I've had with exchanges and
    returns with one of your products. I hope Best Buy will address this problem
    to my satisfaction. This incident has left me extremely angry.

    Here's my problem: First I should say I hope someone actually reads this.
    Given the experience I am about to write about, I doubt it. In case you do,
    it is customer service issue #XXXXXXXX.

    In September of '97 I bought a big screen TV from Best Buy. At that time I
    was told I should buy the extended warranty because of how helpful Best Buy
    would be should anything go wrong. One thing I was told was that if
    ANYTHING happened to the TV, including something like me dropping it and
    breaking it, the company would fix/replace it. Luckily, I did not have to
    test this out - but I did read the warranty fairly carefully and I am pretty
    sure that if I physically broke that TV your warranty would not cover. This
    was a flat out lie that your salesperson told me.

    Anyway, near the end of January I began having problems with the televisions
    convergence. On January 28th I called and asked what I needed to do to have
    it repaired. They sent out someone January 31st. He worked on the TV for a
    while, replaced some chips and decided he could not fix the TV. He called
    your parts department and ordered some parts. I was told that the parts
    would be delivered in a week and the man would come back out and fix the TV.
    No problem, if only it was that easy.

    February 16th - I had not ever received the parts two weeks later, so I
    called your customer service department back and asked where they were. I
    was told they had been back order but the I should have them by the end of
    the week. Annoying, but understandable.

    February 23rd - I never received the parts, so I called back. I was again
    told the parts were backordered. I then asked how long the parts would be
    on back order. I was told they had no idea. At this point, I asked to
    speak to a supervisor. I spoke with Lisa who told me that the parts were
    backordered with no expected arrival date. I pointed out that, that could
    mean 10 years. She said that she had never heard of any parts taking longer
    than one month to deliver. Annoying, but again not anything someone could
    easily fix.

    March 9th - It had been over a month since the parts were ordered. I called
    back your customer service and was told the part was still on back-order
    with no expected arrival date. So, I asked to speak with Lisa again. Now,
    this upset me: I was told she was not in the office. I explained my
    situation to the person I was talking to and that I needed to know
    something. I mean between Sony and Best Buy, somebody should have been able
    to figure out where the hell these parts were. At this point I was told to
    hold on. All of the sudden, Lisa comes on the line. Why did the person who
    answered the phone lie to me and say that she was not there?????? Lisa told
    me that after our previous conversation she had put in a request to just
    have the TV replaced, but the request had been denied. When I asked why she
    said she did not know and that there was no direct way to contact the people
    who denied the claim. Now, I can understand why you would not directly want
    customers dealing with your no lemon dept., but why can't your employees
    call them to find out what is going on? Lisa said the only thing I could do
    at this point was call the corporate office.

    March 9th - Called the corporate office. I spoke to someone there named
    Marcus. Marcus put me on hold and came back after a while saying that he
    had figured out what the deal was and that if the parts were not in by the
    following Tuesday (March 13th) he had given people instructions to just
    replace the TV.

    March 15th - I never heard anything from anyone about the TV so I called
    back to speak to Marcus. I got what I finally have figured out is the
    standard response when you ask for someone on a Best Buy phone line that
    "they are unaway from (a)their desk or (b)the building." I left Marcus a
    voice mail

    March 16th - Never heard back from Marcus so I called back. I was again
    told that marcus was MIA

    March 19th - I called back again. This time I was told Marcus was again
    unavailable. I explained my situation and was pretty upset about the whole
    thing. I was told someone would get back to me. Finally, I get a call from
    Brad Walker telling me that Marcus had gotten my message and tracked him
    down.

    Now this is when I started to get really really irritated. Brad informed me
    that the parts I had been waiting on for well over a month were no longer
    available. That would have been OK if what Marcus had told me in the first
    place had happened (that they would just replace the TV), but instead Brad
    tells me that they have to send a repair man back out to the house. Why did
    it take you 6 weeks to tell me that the parts were not and would not ever be
    available?!?!

    March 20th - Repair man comes back to my house. Him and I have a good laugh
    over what he is expected to do. He has been given instructions to try and
    repair the TV component by component. The poor guy is replacing individual
    resistors on my TV in my living room, that's absurd. Furthermore, he
    doesn't even have an oscilliscope to help him out with the repair. Needless
    to say, he can't fix the TV.

    So, I called Brad back. Originally I was told that they did not think he
    was available (surprise!), but when I told them I had the repair man in my
    house and we needed to talk to him, they found Brad. Brad talks to the
    repair man and informs me that they now need to take my television. I
    agree, although I had been told that my waiting was over and the silly thing
    was supposed to have been replaced a week earlier. Brad also tells me that
    the repair should take 2 weeks and if I don't hear anything to call him
    back.

    March 22 - They come pick up my TV.

    April 5th (Over 2 mos since my first call!!!!!) - I tried to call Brad to
    ask him where my TV was. Again, noone can find Brad.

    So, I call the corporate office to talk to Marcus, who is also not
    available. I finally talk to Sarah explain my whole situation. She tracks
    down Marcus who tells her that I should fax over some information and he
    will get the TV replaced.

    April 6th - I called to speak with Sarah who is of course, unavailable. I
    leave a message. I was very surprised that she actually called me back. Of
    course, she did tell me that I had not faxed her everything she needed. But
    that if I did fax it before noon, I would get a call back before the end of
    the day letting me know what to do about my TV. I was a little curious why
    she did not tell me the previous day that I had not faxed the correct stuff.
    Right before the end of the day, I called and left Marcus a message saying
    that I had been told he would call me back and would he please do so.

    April 9th - I, of course, never heard anything from anyone. So, I called
    back and asked to speak to Sarah, who, of course, was unable to be found. I
    will admit that I started to get a little upset at this point, but I asked
    the guy who I was talking to if he could try and find her because I was
    trying to resolve an over two month old situation and she was the only
    person who seemed to know the current status of things.
    His response was a pretty rude "I am not going to walk around the building
    looking for someone for you." You all had wasted over two months of my
    time - I don't think it would have been much of leap to expect this jerk to
    put some damn effort into finding the only person who had the information
    that could help me. Instead I got transferred to Jason Clark. He told me
    that Marcus was not available but he did see notes about my previous calls
    and that I should receive a call from Marcus first thing in the morning. He
    also said that if I did not receive a call from Marcus I should call him
    back at extension 608.

    April 10 - I call and leave a few more messages of course, neither Jason nor
    Marcus are reachable.

    April 11 - I called and said I wanted to speak to someone dammit. Nicole
    was luckily helpful, she said I probably could not speak to Marcus or Jason
    directly, but to hold on. She finally comes back with the information I
    need to replace my TV. So, I went to Best Buy and they let me replace it.

    Why did all of this take so long? Why do you guys not return phone calls
    when you say you will (ever)?? Why is it impossible to reach people even
    when they specifically tell you to call and try and speak with them?

    I will note, the times I actually did speak to most of the customer service
    people, they were nice and some (esp. Marcus, Lisa, Nicole, Sarah, and Brad)
    all seemed like they really were going to try and help me out - but you have
    so much crap involved in your system that it is impossible to get anything
    resolved.

    Finally, I am still really upset over the fact that it took you 6 weeks to
    admit that you just could not get the replacement parts. What is the deal
    with that? It does not take that long. Why was I told more than once that
    the TV would be replaced and then was just given another list of things that
    had to happen before it would be replaced? Why even after they got to the
    point of realizing they were not going to be able to fix did it still take a
    week of calling back to see why noone ever called me - even though I was
    told I would receive return calls the same day.

    I can understand parts being back ordered and I can understand that there
    are some problems with a large company. But this was ridiculuous. The only
    reasonable thing I can think of is that you guys figure people will tire of
    dealing with you and just give up.

    I cannot believe that I am the only person who has had these problems.
    Actually, I know I'm not because as I've been relaying this story to others,
    a few have told me they had similar experiences with Best Buy.

    Here's how you can help: Fire who ever is running your customer service
    department. This person needs to be replaced with someone who actually
    understands that if people get handled this badly they are not going to ever
    buy anything from you again.
    Then again, why should that person care. He/she probably has had a
    working TV for the past couple months, huh?

  90. D*mn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I've never killed any children, stole anyone's land, slaughtered anyone's recources, raped any women or destroyed any culture"

    You missed out on all the fun. Better luck next continent.

  91. best buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an advertisement is nothing more than an invitation for an offer from the consumer. best buy has no obligation to sell anything at a particular price.

  92. Best Buy coming to Canada by BlueStreak · · Score: 1

    Somewhat off topic but I thought I'd share with US /.ers

    I was really excited when I heard that Best Buy was coming to Canada - finally, someone that could compete with the likes of Future Shop! (Canadian equivalent of Best Buy)

    Unfortunately, Future Shop was quite scared of Best Buy and let themselves be bought out. They did have good reason to be afraid: Best Buy has huge buying power and influence over the companies they deal with (or so I've heard).

    The point is: I was really hoping that the introduction of Best Buy would mean lower prices, better customer service and better post-sale service. I bet what will happen is continuation of the status quo (barely decent cust service, etc).

    With regards to this fiasco, I just really hope this doesn't happen here and that the people working for Best Buy are at least half ways intelligent.

  93. Legal Prescedent? by Dyslexic · · Score: 3, Informative

    A few years back, buy.com advertised a 19" monitor for sale at a price of $169 (list at the time was in the mid $400s). I saw the ad and ordered a monitor, thinking it was a great deal.

    Well, word aparrently got out and buy.com got flooded with orders for the monitor. Buy.com sent out a couple e-mails explaining the typo. They decided the only fair way to award their stock of monitors, was by taking a random pick of all purchasers. I did not end up with a monitor. Buy.com apologised profusely, and for the most part was very responsible in the matter. It was not like the bait and switch that BBY is known to do in the past (don't think for a second that this is the first time they've tried to pull this trick).

    I was not really upset over the matter. I was not really looking for a monitor at the time, but the big size and low price appealed to me. Granted, I would not probably order from buy.com ever again, but I was not furious. It's not as if I was charged for a product I did not recieve.

    Fast foreward a year and a half. I recieved a letter from a law firm that was handling a class action lawsuit against buy.com in the monitor mishap. The judge in the case found that buy.com was responsible for their typo and awarded the suit a large settlement. Well, after legal feeds were subtracted, each customer in the suit gained somewhere around $300. IANAL, but wouldn't this set some kind of legal presecent to force Best Buy to honor their online price, typo or not?

    --
    This comment is brought to you by the drug caffiene, and the number 5.
    1. Re:Legal Prescedent? by McD!ck · · Score: 1

      I would agree that this is going to end the same way! But the answer is in your statement, "Fast foreward a year and a half". Nothing happens quickly in our legal system.

      I was one of the 2000+ people who bought that card. I will say that I am not looking forward to the legal battle, but I will go through with it, just because Best Buy has acted so harshly and inappropriately for circumstances. I am willing to go the whole way!

      McD

      --
      People who are against human cloning must be bitter they are not good enough to be cloned.
    2. Re:Legal Prescedent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are lucky, Best Buy will send you a Geforce 4 card a year-and-a-half from now. When it's worth about $50.

    3. Re:Legal Prescedent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We didn't get nearly $300, we got somewhat over $47.

      It must've been nice to be the lawyers on that case and grab about $250,000 of the settlement.

  94. Best at selling warranties? by baxshep · · Score: 1

    Best Buy has a great selection but their sales staffs' primary mission is to push those extended warranties. Ignorant salespeople who push extended warranties and give bad advise on expensive purchases are bad for the consumer by wasting their $ and bad for the store by contributing to those long lines you see at the Returns counter. Case in point: bought a Fujitus laptop for the wife. Was assured that it had dedicated video memory. Before we could get away we had to be harangued w/ "these laptops WILL break, you NEED our warranty" and "these things run slow from the factory and our techs will give it a performance increase for $65". Adding to the guy trying to sell me PC100 memory upgrade for a 133 mhz bus computer. Took it home, checked memory, noticed there was 8 megs of the 512 missing (shared video!) and we returned the computer the next day since we found a bad pixel. Took our $, went to Circuit City and bought a Sony VAIO w/ no trouble or sales pitches at all.

  95. That's not freakin funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's Insightful...
    Mr. Moderator mod as such please.

  96. Jackpot! Help Weed Out Fraud by alexander.morgan · · Score: 2, Informative

    It looks like somebody might have hit the jackpot. Especially the guy who got arrested. INAL, but lying to the police to get somebody arrested doesn't sound good. All that damage to his reputation, emotional distress, etc.. Talk to some attorneys--fast--and before saying another word to anyone else.

    And everyone, please help prevent this sort of thing happening again by reporting your experience to the on-line rating services. Best Buy, if that's the right company has an 8.2 out of 10 rating at BizRate.COM. 2,000 angry customers can fix that. Although at Reseller Ratings they're already at 1.54 out of 10. Not much fixing needed there. For more info, take a look at:

    BizRate: Best Buy Rating 8.2

    Reseller Ratings: Best Buy Rating 1.54

    There are more rating services, but that's a start.

  97. What about other retialers? by ahappli · · Score: 1

    Is it false advertising to put one price on your webstore and another in your physical store? Last summer I went to buy some DVDs from a local DVD specialty store. On the website they were listed for $21 per DVD. When I got there I was charged $24 per DVD instead. I said but on your website it says $21. I was told that he charged more in the store since he had to cover overhead, and with the website there wasn't any overhead. He didn't have to pay someone to be at the Webstore all day. Is this normal or right?

  98. Sue the sons of bitches into the ground by xtal · · Score: 2

    If this happened to me, I'd have a lawyer on their ass so fast it'd make your head spin. Get statements from the arresting officer AND the detective that can be used in court QUICK. You have a well documented story and this should be a no-brainer to win, and a creative lawyer should be able to do a hell of a lot better than "damage to reputation".

    Best Buy should get their name in lights for eternity on the web for this. It's a disgrace, and that manager should be arrested for making false claims to the police.

    --
    ..don't panic
  99. So...did they reply? by Spinality · · Score: 1

    You need to drop the other boot on this one. :)

    --
    -- We all have enough strength to endure the misfortunes of other people. La Rochefoucauld
  100. Great Motivational Speaking by richlb · · Score: 1

    Just an observation:

    Steve Lynch, who runs this site, is a MASTER of motivational speaking. I've read through most of his posted comments, which are littered with phrases like "...you hold the power..." and "...it us US who have the options on our side, not them."

    Perhaps he lives "in a van down by the river."

  101. They did it on purpose. by abolith · · Score: 1

    I friend of mine works for best buy. He saw the price and wanted to place an order but the manager of the computer section stopped him saying he "really didn't want to do that" the next day they reneg on the deal......
    Sounds fishy to me. he placed to order anyways and has since gotten his card without any major hassle....of course he also works there and had access to certin phone numbers that the rest of us don't. He just had to call someone a bit higher on the food chain who knew that he knew what was going on and that he could blow the whistle so made sure he got the card at said price.

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  102. Price Mistake Of The Day by DeadBugs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's kind of funny that after having trouble with this in the past, Buy.com has a "Price Mistake Of The Day" special on their front page everyday.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:Price Mistake Of The Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went here - http://www.us.buy.com/retail/savings_central.asp?l oc=15384 - for the specials of the day.

      It ws blank. ;)

      ac

  103. I WORK there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I started at the best buy store just the other week , and as the things I have to say are not "in line" with the company , I prefer to remain anon.
    Yes , I beleve the whole tyhing as it was played out . I beleve the cust. has a wrongfull incarceration and slande/liable sute that is eceptionaly strong.
    The company has come odwn from on high to break Rob's back about "shrink" the retail term for loss and fraud. is that an excuse for hauling off a cistomer in chains ? No , and nothing is. it's apauling as sickening that things like this happen , butr there money is not the geek who will come back time and agian , nor is it the person who knows the law , its the soccer mom who has more time than money .
    As salesmen we are told to push the web sight , make shure the warrany is sold , and let someone know if it's not . Is that right ? I dont know.
    What I do know is that Rob is not the only manager in the store , and if you wanted to push , the big boss (Sally of Susan I think) Can make recomendations about him to the corprat office. I also kow if i were treeted this way , i wold not be nearly as happy about it as this person seems to be.
    I am there and will continue to work there for one simple reason : it's the job i can get. I hope , truly and sincerly that if you do come in I'm he person who helps you , cause I don't knw evrything , i know a hell of alot more than the average tech does there

    1. Re:I WORK there by Nintendork · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Please go back to school and study English.

    2. Re:I WORK there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah seriously. That was the most unreadable piece of shit I've seen in ages.

    3. Re:I WORK there by erroneus · · Score: 2

      Yet more cause not to shop at Best Buy -- the literacy of their employees.

      Okay... that's mean... flamebait. But christ!!! That's impossibly bad spelling. The grammar is acceptable but I just couldn't read that with efficiency.

    4. Re:I WORK there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps this AC is trying to explain WHY he works there -
      beleve...tyhing...wrongfull...slande/liable...su te . .. ceptionaly...cistomer...apauling...web sight ...shure...recomendations...corprat...treete d...alot

      it's the job i can get
      And he forgot to add "only" to this sentence.

      Jeezus god. Another reason to shop at Newegg.

    5. Re:I WORK there by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      After what he witnessed, I would safely say that he was EXTREMELY nervous about posting. For what reason, well you can see why.. *shrugs*
      As for our poor Indian, karma of +5? Bah.. Toss another one in for his level-headedness on how he handled the situation.
      And a -10 karma for the BB manager while yer at it too :D

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    6. Re:I WORK there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you are clever and misspelled everything to cover your tracks, or you are really dumb because it would be damn easy to ID you by the way you spell, DUDE!!

      BTW, I like your post anyway. I think you're telling the truth. I hope you're a clever guy!

  104. if we dont stand up now..... by f_kruegar · · Score: 1

    there will be more online retailers trying to pull the same thing.. it was not a 'typo' .. no way can you type in 129.99 from 399.99.. also.. there was the text 'special pre-order savings of $200'.. so that makes no sense.. card didnt cost 599 did it? also.. people including myself called in and asked was that the correct price.. "YES" so.. before you jump the gun and start bashing.. go research this.. i believe they should be held to the agreement.. i,myself, had money reserved on my debit card.. for over a month.. in many attempts to get bestbuy to release the charge got nothing but FORM emails.. even talkin on the phone i was denied.. i contacted my bank and they said the only way to release the charge was for bestbuy to contact them and give them the authorization number..etc..etc.. either by phone or fax... did they? no.. so i was out of that money.. sure.. it was only $138 something.. but still.. its the principle.. if there wasn't a transaction.. then why was their a charge on my debit card... ??? also.. lots of ppl wondering why this just appeared? this has been going on since February. I have contacted local tv stations.. attorney generals..etc.. about this and when the smoke clears.. we will get our cards.. if it takes going to a class action suit.. it will happen... like i said earlier.. if we dont stand up now and stop this.. it will continue... and for those talkin about a 'TOS' (terms of service).. at no time did i see or was i told to read over their TOS during my whole setting up a new account to purchasing to final submitting my order... AND.. if you look at their page and know HTML.. they have their TOS specificaly hidden in a table cell.. and it had a black background.. w/that it doesnt even LOOK like a URL... so i believe that was done intentional..*sp*.. PLUS.. since this has happened.. they have went and re-wrote their TOS to try to protect themselves.. but this wont help.. the TOS was printed and documented along w/all the information.. you can see at Steve's page at Hypothermia.. http://hypothermia.gamershardware.com/articles/bes tbuy_gf4deal.html thats my 2 cents... like it or not.. things happen beyond some peoples control.. but i have worked in the design business and how could a mistake of this magnitude get skipped by and put online? it just doesnt happen.... and if it does.. they need to honor it..

  105. good idea! by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    I think this sounds perfectly reasonable. The least that could come of it is hopefully getting that manager fired so other people don't have to deal with him.

    In my experience, Best Buy has really gone downhill over the last year, absolutely terrible service they have these days.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  106. If you slashdotters had half a brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you'd realize that most intelligent e-tailers and even catalog's have a cute little line in small print at the bottom: 'We are not responsible for errors or misprints' or 'Price subject to change.'

    RTFM idiots or in this case RTFSP

    1. Re:If you slashdotters had half a brain by scootr1 · · Score: 0

      speaking of "idiots", why'd you put the apostrophe in "catalog's"? Is it possessive?

      Anonymous coward.

  107. ...needed something to do tonight... by wolf- · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, I was wonder how to spend this fine Wednesday evening. I believe the 30 minute drive to Tucker would be time well spent...

    Top 10 things to do before shopping at a Best Buys:

    10. Put on your running shoes.
    9. Contact a bail bondsman
    8. Change the batteries in your mini recorder.
    7. Program your attorney's phone number into cell phone
    6. Change your underwear (it gets nasty after a weekend in jail)
    5. Practice being white

    .... Ok, I only had 6....

    --
    ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
  108. I wouldn't user "Moron" so liberally.... by kannen · · Score: 2
    He'd done nothing wrong, so they never should have cuffed him in the first place. It's one thing for the police to cuff someone who actually committed a crime, but it's quite another for them to cuff and publicly arrest an upstanding citizen who's done nothing wrong.
    Here's the problem with your logic: Police are law enforcement officials, but they are not justice officials. Police don't always arrest people who commit crimes - the arrest people who have allegedly committed crimes. Cherian Abraham allegedly committed a crime, so the cops can cuff him. They shouldn't have cuffed him, because they obviously didn't have a very convincing case. The point I want to remind you of is that in our legal system, we hold that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty.

    I'm with the guy who suggested that they arrest the manager for falsifying a police report.

  109. quick summary... by bani · · Score: 2

    customer goes to store, politely asks that best buy honor their binding-by-state-law contractual agreement.

    best buy tries to weasel out of their binding-by-state-law obligation.

    customer stands their legal ground.

    best buy lies to the police to get customer arrested.

    best buy lies to the police for a second time when confronted by the police with the fact they have no basis for charges.

    best buy is later warned by the police to stop their behaviour.

    1. Re:quick summary... by catfood · · Score: 2

      best buy lies to the police to get customer arrested.

      best buy lies to the police for a second time when confronted by the police with the fact they have no basis for charges.

      best buy is later warned by the police to stop their behaviour.

      Interesting, isn't it? The customer is arrested for the appearance of fraud on the say-so of the manager, but the store manager isn't arrested for making an accusation that is now known to be false--an accusation that he knew was false when he made it. (I'm referring to trespassing, not necessarily the fraud charge. The manager had to know his customer was not guilty of trespassing, and he should have known the fraud accusation was uncertain at best.)

    2. Re:quick summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The manager had to know his customer was not
      >guilty of trespassing, and he should have known
      >the fraud accusation was uncertain at best

      I don't think you've heard the end of it.
      I've asked Best Buy to investigate this case
      from the point of view that making false statements to police officers in Georgia is
      a felony. I think some complaints asking the
      same question should go to the Attorney General in Georgia, and to the District Attorney in that county.

      Never mind the sale price, or the customer.
      This fraud + racism is serious business.

      Rod Hill should be given room and board for 10 years over this. Never mind "class action" this
      and "false advertising that" and "customer settles" the other thing. I want to know why
      a person who commits such an atrocity as to lie to police in order to effect harrassment of a minority is not behind bars, or at least on bail,
      at this very moment.

  110. More Best Buy Shennanigans by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's another data point to consider, a story about how Best Buy gave a customer a hard time, apparently, for buying something besides their top-of-the-line sattelite system.

    I know it's going to be years before I make a purchase from Best Buy again...they're going to have go to a very long way to recover my confidence as a customer. Issuing a formal apology to their customers would be a start.

    1. Re:More Best Buy Shennanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the article. In no way did he get hassled for buying the lower grade satalite. He doesn't even make that claim.
      In reality, I have this feeling that he was condescending to the guard. Personally i don't care if they check my receipt. If that prevents shoplifters and consequently keeps their prices low, that's all that matters.
      This video card dilemma is entirely different.

    2. Re:More Best Buy Shennanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the story, and this guy is just an arrogant asshole. Sorry, somebody had to say it.

      Tell him to go back to beating his wife and drinking with his Marine buddies.

  111. Stupid policies at Best Buy by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

    This is not related to the matter at hand, but one of these days when I were at the Best buy, I saw a notice posted on the Computer Games section which says :

    "We cannot take back games or dvds that have been opened for fear of Computer Viruses"

    So I guess some one at BB has figured out a way to perch a virus at the tip of every "Write once CDROM" which would effectively wipe out a system.

    Fools!

  112. 'Honorable' Experience with CompUSA re: discounts by MattRog · · Score: 2

    Back when 8X burners had just entered the market a friend notified me of an outstanding deal in the Sunday paper for a Smart and Friendly 8x SCSI (with card) burner for something like $150 from CompUSA. We knew that they should be around $400 or so, and armed with the flyer marked $150 we hurried to our nearest CompUSA indeed saw that the sticker price was around $400 ($375 or somesuch).

    CompUSA honored the flyer price and we walked out of there with 5 8x CD-Rs. Now there's integrity! We checked the paper a week later and noticed the corrected price. ;)

    Granted, we only purchased 5 CD-Rs and their markup probably covered their losses for those 5. I bet if we tried to buy 2,000 (like in this case) they'd be less willing to lose a TON of money.

    --

    Thanks,
    --
    Matt
  113. Facts for the Less Informed by FleshWound · · Score: 5, Informative
    Rather than reply to each individual post where someone has made a grave error because they're not aware of the facts, I'm putting them in one post for easy reference:

    Best Buy advertised the VisionTek Xtasy GeForce4 Ti4600 for preorder at the price of $129.99 (plus applicable sales tax) on their website (bestbuy.com) on Wednesday, February 6, 2002.

    Over 2,000 customers placed orders for the card at this special price.

    These customers were greeted with confirmation web pages, confirmation e-mail messages, issued order numbers, and some even received backorder confirmation e-mail messages (some even received multiple backorder confirmations).

    Within hours, Best Buy pulled the offer, and "corrected" what they later called a "pricing error."

    Cancellation e-mails were sent out, and cited a "systems error" for the mistake.

    Best Buy issued a press released (only published at news.com) which blamed "human error" for the mistake.

    Customers who called Best Buy to inquire about the order cancellation were told that VisionTek would not allow Best Buy to sell the cards at the originally agreed-upon price (Best Buy was falsely accusing VisionTek of illegal price-fixing tactics).

    Best Buy does have a disclaimer on their web site in the form of their Terms of Service Agreement.

    At no point during the account-creation or order-placing processes are customers required to read or actively agree to these terms (see Specht vs. Netscape; also see the FTC's Advertising and Marketing on the Internet: Rules of the Road).

    Best Buy has actually changed their Terms of Service since this entire fiasco began.

    Best Buy's Terms of Service do not supercede federal, state, and local consumer protection laws, which (in many cases) specifically outlaw this type of activity.

    Best Buy's Terms of Service exist for the sole purpose of tricking customers into surrendering their consumer rights. The way consumer law is written, customers must exercise their rights; if they surrender them, the company in question is not required to adhere to these laws.

    "E-tailers" are subject to the same rules, regulations, and laws that apply to their brick-and-mortar cousins. (See the FTC's Dot Com Disclosures)

    Best Buy has stated that absolutely no one will be receiving the card at the previously agreed-upon price, yet well over 140 customers have already done so.

    Best Buy is ignoring its customers at this point. E-mails go unanswered, and phone calls are greeted with a promise to escalate the call, but the customer must wait for someone to contact them; this, of course, never happens.

    At least one person has already taken this to Small Claims Court. He had his first hearing a couple of weeks ago, but Best Buy requested a continuance, which was granted.

    A class action lawsuit is still an option, and one that may be used.

    There are more facts that are pertinent, but these are the most commonly misunderstood or ignored pieces of information.

    1. Re:Facts for the Less Informed by rosewood · · Score: 2

      One key missing point that I noticed

      Customers also called the 1800 best buy # and were told by persons that the price was correct

      Also, IIRC - and it can be found on the hypothermia website - there were also a few stores that had IN-STORE wrong prices around the same time

    2. Re:Facts for the Less Informed by FleshWound · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes . . . thanks rosewood. There are so many facts, it's hard to keep them all straight. =)

    3. Re:Facts for the Less Informed by rosewood · · Score: 2

      This story has become so huge that unless you are already in a thread, its pointless - but thats because the actual story itself is HUGE

      but I read all the +5 comments and its interesting to see so much more support for the people and against best buy then I saw before this arrest (people just saying everyone was trying to rip off best buy, etc)

      I also give Steve@Hypothermia props for keeping up on all this, esp working with the DA offices in many states

    4. Re:Facts for the Less Informed by tenchim · · Score: 1

      IMHO, there is one point missing from that list that would make for a more rounded account. Best Buy emailed everyone who placed an online order for the video card a $30 electronic gift card. Some people used them, others didn't as a way to voice their non-acceptance of the compensation.

    5. Re:Facts for the Less Informed by clontzman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One thing I didn't see mentioned -- I ordered the card and Best Buy did, in fact cancel. A week later, I got a $20 gift certificate to the site. I never expected to get the card for that price anyway (it was obviously an error), so I was happy to get the Robotech DVD box set for $15 instead of $35.

    6. Re:Facts for the Less Informed by sheldon · · Score: 2

      Consumer price protection laws only deal with intentional false advertisement of product. They exempt the retailer if the ad was simply a mistake...

      I'm afraid you are distorting the facts.

    7. Re:Facts for the Less Informed by FleshWound · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Consumer price protection laws only deal with intentional false advertisement of product. They exempt the retailer if the ad was simply a mistake...
      Those are the laws against false advertising.

      There are laws in most places (I believe they even exist at the federal level, and since for everyone except residents of MN, this would be a federal issue, due to interstate commerce) that force retailers to honor prices even if they're the product of an honest mistake.
      I'm afraid you are distorting the facts.
      No, not at all.
    8. Re:Facts for the Less Informed by sheldon · · Score: 2

      If these laws exist, you should have absolutely no problem quoting from them.

      Give it a shot, it'll make your argument more forceful so that it doesn't look like you are distorting the facts.

  114. other best buy problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So a year or so ago, my roomates and I went to bestbuy to purchase a cd burner for burning and mixing cds.

    so, being teh computer geek, I was thinking I would install it and save on some costs...bad idea. when we got home and opened it up, there was nothing inside except one of the oldest cd-rom drives I had ever seen in my life. Think Soundblaster v0.1 Of course we wre outraged by this and immediately went back to the store to complain. the manager looked at us and more or less accused us of switching it and trying to rip them off.

    So, my roomate who had some time the next few days got on the phone and started calling and getting names and went up the ladder till he finally got someone with some clout. Once we explained the problem and explained that we were not going be screwed by their supply problems and were not going away, the gu caved and called up the manager at the store and had him give us what we bought. Needless to say we opened that puppy up right there in the store and double checked EVERYTHING in the box.

    Moral of the story: Squeaky wheel gets the grease. Luckily we didn't get arrested.

    -hommiefro

  115. Many people are saying it's not possible... by RyanFenton · · Score: 2


    But it IS possible for a company to accept returns on games. The trick is to track how many games a customer returns, using scanned receipt numbers, etc. Have a policy that you don't accept more than 2 game returns over two months, and you have a reasonably working system. My local Electonics Botique had a system running like that, and it worked wonderfully - they even gave cash back on games, and charged the vendor a penalty for the return.

    :^)

    Ryan Fenton

  116. It's in the bill of rights by shawnmelliott · · Score: 1

    We find these truths to be self evident. That all men can play equal. That ping times shall be the same and framerates shall not drop below 50 FPS

    John Hancock and company

  117. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
    A price was advertised that was wrong. The error was discovered and corrected.

    Unfortunately, it's a tad more complicated. In this case, the "error" was reported by a consumer, and then the "erroneous price" was confirmed to the consumer as being valid. Furthermore, the description that went along with the supposedly incorrect price provided an approximately correct advertisement of the savings they could expect. I'm not sure if the end results change any, but there is certainly some evidence that the error was really intentional.

    Also, remember that an advertised price does not constitute an offer.

    This is true, but what I'd like to find out from any lawyers out there is whether or not the VERBAL confirmation of the price constitutes an offer.

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  118. Re:Out of the woodwork :) - Clarke Howard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk to Clarke Howard!!! When I used to live in Atlanta, Clarke Howard was the consumer advocate on one of the local TV stations. He always profiled normal people how had been taken advantage of by some company. He would then talk with the company higher ups and get the person some sort of deal for their problems. This means that

    1) you will get something out of it
    2) All of Atlanta will know to avoid Best Buy like the plague.

  119. Best Buy's management by schmaltz · · Score: 2

    You gotta wonder where Best Buy's management is at with all this. Do they:

    1. Briskly rub their hands with glee, chortling "mwa-ha-ha-ha! we got away with another misleading advert, and topped it off with a customer in the clink!"

    2. Scratch their heads and wonder about that store manager down yonder.

    3. Call their attorneys and ask, "Bernie, do ya got us covered on this one? Yeup, no publicity, just make sure we don't sell those units below cost. And prosecute that damned injun kid."

    If I were managing that empire, sure I'd be concerned about losing money, but not on one piece of bad advertising. I'd be firing the idiot who made the mistake, offering apologies and a free computer to the kid that got arrested, firing the store manager, and reassuring my other customers that they won't get arrested for asserting their rights under the law.

    Best of luck to Abraham Cherian, and contact the ACLU or somebody to burn Best Buy back!

    --
    Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
    1. Re:Best Buy's management by wolf- · · Score: 1
      And prosecute that damned injun kid.

      Was he a Native American (North American Heritage, tribes, "injun") or a gentlemen of Indian decent (Asian Heritage)?

      It doesnt matter to the story either way, but in your ethnic slurs, you should be most accurate.

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    2. Re:Best Buy's management by Caradoc · · Score: 1

      You really think the store manager is going to know (or care) about the difference between "Indian" as a person of southeastern Asian descent vs. "Indian" as Native American?

      To a yokel like that, "injun" would simply be his pronunciation of the epithet, without any additional meaning but "non-white."

      Yes, I'm a bit cynical about this - locally, a Sikh gentleman who owned a gas station was shot and killed after the Sept. 11th attacks because the shooter thought he was a Muslim (because of the turban, despite the fact that local Muslims don't wear turbans - they wear the little caps that look like a yarmulke but a little taller...)

      --
      Specialization is for insects. - R.A.H.
    3. Re:Best Buy's management by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. How's ASU these days?

    4. Re:Best Buy's management by schmaltz · · Score: 2

      Just to be clear, I invoked the "injun" racial epithet to go along with the story's apparent theme, that the shopper was being arrested for a) being a nuisance/trespassing, and probably b) being an "injun" nuisance.

      Personally, I think of American "Indians" as "Native American", and India "Indians" as "Asian Indian" or "Indian American." Depends on who corrected me last.

      I threw the "injun" in there not out of disrespect for Abraham, but as a reminder that many American Caucazoids still treat brown-skinned Americans disrespectfully.

      --
      Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
    5. Re:Best Buy's management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Sorry for the anonymous coward posting, but I forgot my handle and password)

      This is slightly tangential - but a bit of background on ethnicity and religion needs to be filled in for the benefit of our North American readers.

      For most anybody in India, the name 'Cherian' would immediately bring to mind the picture of a Keralite (from the southern Indian state of Kerala; also known as a Malayali, after the native language Malayalam) Christian. Slightly better-informed Indians would also associate it with the Syrian Christian community, which is a significant minority in that state, but with an illustrious and ancient tradition. This tradition dates back to Apostle St. Thomas (and very early middle-eastern Syrian Christian tradition), who is widely believed to have landed in India c 40 AD. The exact details appear clouded and are still debated, but there is no doubt that Syrian Christians in India follow some variant of early Syriac tradition including nomenclature. I need hardly point out that this dates back to the period before (Greek/Aramaic) Christianity reached Europe.

      Fast-forward to the present. The tradition still continues and prospers, 2000 years later. Syrian-Christians in India are among the highest- educated and highest-achieving minorities in India. A simple search on Google for 'Cherian' will reveal a huge number of hits to websites for obviously highly accomplished individuals, many in higher education, science, technology, medicine, law, civil services, etc., from around the world. The closest analogy that can be drawn is to the Jewish community in the US.

      One of the consequences is that there are a large number of high-achieving Syrian Christian geeks, one of whom is probably Abraham Cherian, the protagonist of the present Slashdot discussion.

      With that bit of background on ethnicity out of the way, it would immediately become obvious why the situation would have looked absurd to any observer of Indian origin. The Best Buy story would be immediately obvious as (to use a quaint term from Indian legalese) a 'concoction or fabrication', a 'tissue of lies'.

      Needless to say, Best Buy is not going to get one little cent from me in the future. Big Mistake.

  120. People wanting something for nothing by Eric+Green · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    So let me get this straight. A video card costs Best Buy around $250 wholesale to stock. They sell it for $329. They accidentally print an ad selling it for $129. And everybody's upset because Best Buy won't sell the card for below what it costs?!

    While I think Best Buy has been an utter incompetent at handling this situation, I have no sympathy for the people trying to get something for nothing either.

    -E

    --
    Send mail here if you want to reach me.
    1. Re:People wanting something for nothing by jred · · Score: 1

      I don't think everyone is upset because they won't sell it for less than cost, I think everyone is upset because Best Buy *consistently* has these little under-cost accidents...

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    2. Re:People wanting something for nothing by 0x20 · · Score: 1

      Why should anyone know, or care, what best buy's wholesale cost is? It's irrelevant!

      If you were walking down the street and saw a sign advertising a dozen donuts for 12 cents, don't tell me you wouldn't be rightfully pissed off if the donut shop refused to honor that price because donuts cost them more than 1 cent each to make.

      Also, if you read the article, you'd see that best buy stated "a savings of $200" in the ad, which is one hell of a typo, and verified the $129 price two times over the phone. When they didn't hand over the merchandise after that, that wasn't a little mistake. That was a major bait-and-switch.

    3. Re:People wanting something for nothing by glasswalker889 · · Score: 1

      To expand on this, one of the receipts shows the customer getting the product for $145 instead of $129.99. The reason given for this was that they gave it to the customer at-cost.

      Personally, I take this to mean that BestBuy gets each of the cards for $145. Considering that this comes out to a loss of less than $16 a card I think that it would have been smarter for them to take that hit and avoid the bad publicity and maybe even, if they have the skill, spin the fact that they took the hit for the customer into good publicity. Instead they decided to refuse to honor the offer and make a lot of people angry.

    4. Re:People wanting something for nothing by cicatrix1 · · Score: 1

      Go back and read some of the other comments that explain it better. You missed the part about how it wasn't really a "typo". Apperently they said it was a "Special Pre-Order Sale for $129.00 - a savings of $200". Oops, I accidentally typed out all this math I accidentally did.

      --

      I know more than you drink.
  121. Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to return 2-5 games a month after copying them at EB... I never got asked a question or raised an eyebrow on the staff... some of them knew my name even...

  122. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

    That's crazy, then why don't they just advertise everything as free in the flyer, then when you get to the store say that, oh yeah there's a 'stocking fee' or some such nonsense? Why, because it is illegal! The printed price is not an offer but it does mean something.

    Just yesterday I was in Tower Records and I bought a CD, in the store and ON THE CD the sale price of 9.99 was printed, however when I got to the register, they charged it to me as 12.99! I was like what's going on here? They said that they sale had ended or some such nonsence. I know that they as simple button pushers can do nothing about it but it would be nice to have 3 more dollars.

    This best buy thing is the same deal, since they offered the price on their WEB SITE and the web site is supposed to be the same as the actual store, aka one price honored at the web site ( when these people preordered it) should be the same price as for the people IN THE STORE!!! BB should just cough up the cards to the people that ordered them from the web site.

  123. Buy From CompUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My roommate bought a GeForce 3 from CompUSA along with a support contract for like $10. The contract entitled him to upgrade to the GeForce 4 for free when it was released.

    From what I understand, once you swap cards you have the opportunity to sign up for another support contract.

    Oh, and CompUSA hasn't given the people I know who have done this any grief whatsoever.

  124. This is wrong, law varies by state and locale by Spinality · · Score: 2

    Several states, counties, and municipalities have item-pricing laws that give consumers certain rights when the price charged doesn't match the price displayed. In Michigan, for example, "the seller must give you: (1) the difference between the amount charged and the affixed price, plus (2) additional compensation of ten times the difference, with a minimum of $1.00 and a maximum of $5.00 for each different item for which you are overcharged or be subject to a lawsuit. If the seller refuses your request, you may bring a lawsuit to recover actual damages or $250.00, whichever is greater, and reasonable attorney fees not to exceed $300.00. Similar protections can be found in Albany County, Massachusetts, and Connecticut. Similarly, the finality of a sales contract varies from place to place. Certain transactions are subject to a "buyer's remorse" period during which the buyer can return the item for a refund. Most auto sales are subject to this protection, for example.

    Bottom line: as usual, if lawyers get involved, the situation gets complicated.

    --
    -- We all have enough strength to endure the misfortunes of other people. La Rochefoucauld
  125. And we have a Winner! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the "Worse than Fry's" contest.

    Combine this with their backing of access controlled "silver disks with music" (to use Phillip's term), and we have a new Evil Retailer(tm).

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  126. Re: Jumping to conclusions by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    What if the typo was made in their centralized mainframe system? Then the wrong price is downloaded to their stores, printers and web site?

  127. Re:Disclaimer? Part 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read up on everything Steve has written. BestBuy apparently changed their TOS after they changed the price.

    Whether its legal or not, they covered their asses, and I hope someone fucks them for it. :)

  128. Same thing with IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some time ago IBM also priced some Thinkpads at $100. They later sent an e-mail to each buyer saying they wouldn't deliver. Nothing happened back them.

  129. Once money changes hands, the contract is final by Quixote · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Many of the people here seem to be missing one crucial point: once the money changes hands, BestBuy has to honor the price! They advertised a special "pre-order" deal. People who paid for this (and whose payment BestBuy accepted) have a right to get the card at that price. Once the money changes hands, the "contract" is in place.

    People who never paid for this "special" pre-order don't have the same rights; they can't force BestBuy to honor the mistake (legally speaking).

    1. Re:Once money changes hands, the contract is final by terrymr · · Score: 2

      The money changing hands is actually part of the performance of the contract - the contract is fully formed at the point where best buys website confirms acceptance of your order.

    2. Re:Once money changes hands, the contract is final by coyote-san · · Score: 2

      Actually, when you provide your credit card it's not yet a payment - the merchant agreements usually prohibit charging a credit card prior to the actual shipment of the item. But it is a binding agreement to pay, and the confirmation notice can only be interpreted as agreement to the terms stated.

      So the original poster's comment that once they accept payment (via credit card) is correct - a "meeting of the minds" has clearly occured, even if neither party has actually performed yet.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    3. Re:Once money changes hands, the contract is final by sheldon · · Score: 2

      Did money actually exchange hands? I see no mention of any customers credit cards actually being billed.

    4. Re:Once money changes hands, the contract is final by Libertaine · · Score: 1

      A "hold" was placed on my credit card for the money.If that counts as money changing hands I'm not sure.

  130. OT Computer Shopper by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, the early 90's the glory days of computer shopper. That once was a great magazine/catalog. I remember when it was once 2 inches thick, full of phone book like pages with ads upon ads of obscure little tech companies. I found some great bargans in that magazine.

    But alas, I watched as it became slimmer and slimmer each month until it eventually shrivled into a clone of all the other computer magazines out there. Damn you ZD.

    1. Re:OT Computer Shopper by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      I'm not a big ZD fan anymore, but is this really their fault? With the WWW, and the plethora (oh how I love to use words like 'plethora') of small stores selling cheap stuff online, Computer Shopper was made irrelevant.

      Still, it was cool. Such a big magazine. It was fun to buy because you seemed to be getting a lot for the money. And I too found some good deals. A few hard drives from HDI (now Insight), a couple of PCs from Quantex (who went under and screwed a lot of people), and a logitech hand scanner I barely ever used.

  131. Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I noticed your sig. Since I'm going offtopic, I'm posting as an AC, but I just thought I'd throw in my .02 and say that I hardly think it appropriate to metamoderate moderators as being UNFAIR when they moderate trolls or offtopic posts.

    It seems that you have a problem with the moderation system itself. Punishing moderators for using functions that were clearly designed to be in the system seems a bit harsh. When I moderate, I probably moderate comments down less than 10% of the time, but sometimes there are trolls that clearly need to be removed, in order to have a semi-intellectual /. experience. (Yes, yes, insert clever "oxymoron" joke here.) Only by using this functionality can the community properly keep trolls in check and the discussion on track. Maybe you long for the days of literary porn and character defamation - I do not.

    By the way, how do you guys think the GREAT (Hopefully) Slashdot Blackout is going? I can't say that I've noticed any difference. Have you?

  132. It might be false advertising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but there is no binding contract. You can't make a contract with the world.

  133. Hmmm by CaptTrips · · Score: 0

    I bought a HP LaserJet 1200se printer about 4 months ago from a BB in Elk Grove California (in a popular area called Laguna). Anyhow, the staff came up to me and asked me if I needed any help and I told them I saw the HP listed on their site for $429. They helped me find the printer. They even gave me two 500 sheets of LaserJet paper for free! I also purchased a 3-year warranty. Basically what I'm saying is you *can't* say every Best Buy is bad, because I shopped at one that was quite the opposite. I think the receipt you received with "$129.99" was a glitch, instead of the "$329.99". Ecommerce applications are notorious for having bugs.

    --

    grep >= ! == $your
  134. Call Clark Howard, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    This sounds like the kind of thing you usually hear on his show. The local number is (404) 872-0750. I'm sure he'd especially love to hear it straight from the horse's mouth (as opposed to talking to the manager, who is at the other end of the horse).

  135. Call Clark Howard!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would soooooo be contacting Clark Howard. I live in Atlanta as well and have had some bad Best Buy experiences, but none even close to this. Clark is sort of a putz, but he's a huge consumer advocate and can probably get Best Buy by the nuts on this one....

  136. Racism? by Otter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well, at least you got some Slashdot karma out of it... ;-)

    Out of curiosity, the linked article seems to think (on the basis of no evidence they mention) that your ethnicity played a role on this. You don't mention any such thing here. Any idea where that insinuation came from?

    Anyway, while I know there are two sides to every story, you seem like a class act and it sounds like you were really treated shabbily. I wouldn't blame you if you sued the pants off Best Buy.

  137. was it really a typo? by Ledskof · · Score: 1

    This is what the ad said:
    "VisionTek GeForce4 Ti4600 for Special Pre-Order
    Price of $129.00..the savings is a $200.00 Value"

    Does that sound like a typo to you? Typo's don't usually go back and restate that you are saving the precise amount after doing typo math. If it was a typo wouldn't the savings value be something different?
    That's not a typo., It's an error somewhere else. Whether the error was in the management of giving this card away cheap, communication of how cheap to sell it, or what was to be sold etc, it just doesn't look like typo results to me.

    --
    This is my sig. The post is over.
    1. Re:was it really a typo? by talon77 · · Score: 1

      Bah. Think about it before you type. Where have you ever seen a geforce4 ti4600 for $339? If it wasn't a typo, it would be closer to 300 dollars savings.

    2. Re:was it really a typo? by Ledskof · · Score: 1

      even if the card cost $399, why would they write something like "$200 savings"

      --
      This is my sig. The post is over.
  138. Re: probably by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

    I think that one store arresting the guy just made a lot of people bitter. It really is just starting to sound like it was a stupid, stupid mistake that went too far.

  139. Call them! by toast- · · Score: 2

    Northlake Ga (Store #513)
    4145 Lavista Rd northlake Square
    Tucker, GA 30084
    Phone: 770-939-7660
    Hours: Mon-Sat 10:00am-9:00pm
    Sun 11:00am-6:00pm

    Those of us whom weren't affected can speak our voice directly! yay!

  140. Use Amex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years ago I ordered a GeForce 2 card from some online outfit in California (I'm in Austin, Tx) on my Amex card. The video card arrives and dosent function correctly so I return it and ask for a refund. At this time I'm told that the market price of the card has dropped during the week and they would ONLY be refunding me what the card current sells for. I'm livid at this point and waste my time trying to explain to them they are ripping me off, all to no avail.

    My next call is to Amex where I explain my story in full. Amex was NOT amused and promptly called the company in question and explained to them they WOULD be refund the entire purchase cost.

    Moral of the story: Get an evil company like Amex on YOUR side and the little evil people of the world shit their pants. Amex rocks.

    1. Re:Use Amex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to mention, this was all on TOP of the restocking fee. While I still felt that was also a rip-off, I didnt really object so much to that. It was the other that burned me up.

  141. I've gotten some nice tools from Sears this way. by tg_schlacht · · Score: 0

    I've been around people with Craftsman tools that broke and who were going to throw them away.

    I'd say "Hey, don't throw that out. It's got a lifetime warranty. Just walk into Sears with it and they'll give you a new one. No receipt needed."

    They'd be like "I don't have the time. I'll just replace it with a Snap-On when the man comes around."

    I'd then take the broken tool, toss it in the trunk and then the next time I went to Sears I'd take it to hardware and have it replaced.

    I've gotten a 1/2 inch ratchet, 2 adjustable wrenches and numerous box-end wrenches and sockets and screwdrivers this way.

  142. Console by CaptTrips · · Score: 0

    About a month ago I was in a Best Buy, browsing the XBox games section. I remembered I needed another controller so I grabbed one off the shelf. I noticed a few new titles when one of the patrons purusing the section wanted to get my feedback on the Xbox. I told them that it was a nice console but the current amount of games and the pricing of games was high. They asked me if it was worth buying and I told them sure, if you have the funds. But I told them to go buy the console from EB. Basically EB offers a 15-day exchange/refund whereas BB only offers an exchange for the same item, and ONLY if your item proves to be broken.

    --

    grep >= ! == $your
  143. Best Buy supports CBDTPA by happyclam · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because Best Buy owns Musicland, they support the CBDTPA.

    Another reason to avoid shopping there.

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    1. Re:Best Buy supports CBDTPA by g1zmo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe we can get a six degrees of [RIAA|MPAA|CBDTPA|DMCA] game going ala the oracle of bacon so we all know who exactly stands for what and where.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
    2. Re:Best Buy supports CBDTPA by goatkoran · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      BEST BUY NEED TO FUCK THE GOAT KORANS ASS
      GOAT KORAN
      Classic 1 HIT ME IN THE SHITTER BABY, UGH HUH
      Classic 2 Oh yeah, in the shitter some more, in the shitter.
      Classic 3 More Ass stretchin goodness.
      Female Goater My pussy is too small for this melon.
      Goatse Grandpas - GRANPA GOAT S3X0R5
      Son of a Goat - Holy fucking son of a goat. Kinda looks like Tako from behind, but to be sure I'd have to ask CowGryl Kneel
      1 Oh, pardon me sir, would you happen to have any ANAL LUBE?
      2 UNGH FART, pssssbt, ungh, tweeep, squeaaaaaak ungh
      3 PFFFFFFFFFFT AHH pffft
      4 FOOOOOOOOOOOOF blud dribble dribble
      Prime Number Shitting Goatse SE THE Prym3 number flow like the river SHIT
      Goatse Returns! Fuck yeah, the goat man is a coming back to Trollaxor
      1 You Will Love to Goatse on all the things of Internet.
      2 Will Search and initiate to new members, and you will show the way to the light (www.goatse.es.org)
      3 When they return of to see our God Goatse, you mock of them.
      4 To fuck, to fuck that are shocked the planets!

      Goatsex goatsex GOATSEX Goat Sex animal sex bestiality
      Of all the animal sex in the world, the one that suffers the most abuse from modern sexual habits is the large barnyard, otherwise known as the animalsex Our animals were intended by nature to function as a smoothly flowing sex systems, in order to promptly flush digestive wastes from the body.
      The large barnyard is one of the four main elimination systems of the world. In Chinese medicine all the internal sex are paired. The large barnyard is paired with the zoo. Your puppy (dog/horse) is made up of four main sections:
      (1) ascending, (2) transverse, (3) descending sex & the (4) sigmoid. It's total length is approximately 5 to 5 1/2 feet and it ends at the anus where feces eliminated from the body. The small pony's length is approx. 26 ft. long. They are called large and small not because of their length but because of their width & diameter.

      * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x *
      gcccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cgc c
      oc/ccccc\ccccccccccccc\cccccccccccc/cccc\cccccc co
      a|ccccccc|ccccccccccccc\cccccccccc|cccccc|cccc cca
      t|ccccccc`.ccccccccccccc|ccccccccc|ccccccc:cc ccct
      s`cccccccc|ccccccccccccc|cccccccc\|ccccccc|c ccccs
      ec\ccccccc|c/ccccccc/cc\\\ccc--__c\\ccccccc :cccce
      xcc\cccccc\/ccc_--~~cccccccccc~--__|c\cccc c|ccccxc c
      *ccc\cccccc\_-~cccccccccccccccccccc~-_\cccc|ccc c*
      gcccc\_ccccc\cccccccc_.--------.______\|ccc|cc ccg
      occcccc\ccccc\______//c_c___c_c(_(__>cc\ccc|c cc co
      accccccc\ccc.ccCc___)cc______c(_(____>cc|cc/cc c ca
      tccccccc/\c|cccCc____)/cccccc\c(_____>cc|_/ccc c ct
      scccccc/c/\|cccC_____)ccccccc|cc(___>ccc/cc\cc c cs
      eccccc|ccc(ccc_C_____)\______/cc//c_/c/ccccc\c cce
      xccccc|cccc\cc|__ccc\\_________//c(__/ccccccc |ccx
      *cccc|c\cccc\____)ccc`----ccc--'cccccccccccc c|cc*
      gcccc|cc\_cccccccccc___\ccccccc/_cccccccccc _/c|cg
      occc|cccccccccccccc/cccc|ccccc|cc\cccccccc cccc|co
      accc|ccccccccccccc|cccc/ccccccc\cc\cccccc ccccc|ca
      tccc|cccccccccc/c/cccc|ccccccccc|cc\cccc ccccccc|t
      sccc|ccccccccc/c/cccccc\__/\___/cccc|cc cccccccc|s
      ecc|ccccccccccc/cccccccc|cccc|ccccccc| ccccccccc|e
      xcc|cccccccccc|ccccccccc|cccc|ccccccc |ccccccccc|x
      * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x *
      --
      goatkoran
  144. Game time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who can get the largest search result out of bestbuy.com?

  145. Venting anecdotes from a college student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I didn't have as bad an experience as this guy at Best Buy, but mine was pretty sad too. The network jack in my room was broken for a long time and I was sick of waiting for Physical Plant to fix it, so I wanted to buy a Hub to work off my roommate's jack. I went down to Best buy, found their really limited selection of ethernet hubs, and tried to decide which one was the best value for my temporary use and which one I could use in the future.

    I ended up finding a price of $40 for a 4-port hub/switch that looked pretty quality. They were out of stock on that one, so I found a $60 version that had some electronics I didn't need, but I was ready to buy. I call over the sales guy. The exchange goes like this:

    Me: I'm looking for a hub to use in my dorm room because my network jack is broken. Do you have any of these in the back (I point to the shelf label)? I'm also considering this other one, but don't want to have to pay if I don't need to.

    The Sales Guy: Well it doesn't matter if you buy the more expensive one- you're just going to return it anyway once your jack is fixed.

    I have not shopped at Best Buy since.

    BTW, I won't shop at Circut City either because they ripped me off a few years ago when I bought a Stealth II Graphics Card that didn't work with my motherboard and charged me a 15% restocking fee when I returned it. But I digress...

  146. Best Buy and FRAUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not exactly 'on topic', but recently our
    credit card was stolen, and the thief had a real
    field day, going into the same Best Buy repeatedly
    and buying things.

    This in spite of the fact that the signature
    strip on the back of the card has:

    ASK FOR I.D.!!

    written on it in big red letters instead of a
    signature.

  147. Let's not forget.... by efedora · · Score: 1

    another great BB idea.
    DivX

    1. Re:Let's not forget.... by wolf- · · Score: 1

      Thought that was Circuit City.

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    2. Re:Let's not forget.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was. =P

  148. Thank God for the police... by gdyas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe a little O/T, but everyone please notice that the police in this instance behaved completely properly throughout the situation, to the point of empathizing with this gentleman.

    With the cops, when they fsck up, everyone's on their back. Nobody notices when the system works, and it appears to be working well here.

    As for Best Buy, get a good lawyer who'll work for a split of the rewards for such harrassing behavior, and drain them dry.

    Make sure you get your GeForce4 out of it, too. Make that manager hand it to you himself.

    --

    The only tool you've got against psychosis is experience.

    1. Re:Thank God for the police... by snol · · Score: 1
      Huh? If that's "behaving completely properly" I'd hate to think what it'd be like otherwise.

      Cops are all the time outside talking to BB and not even bothering to listen to my story. In comes on of the cops, cuffs me (God that hurts) and then tells me that I was cuffed so that I wouldnt hurt anyone.

      Cops took me on a joy ride for half an hour and it was a damn uncomfortable one.

      MAYBE it's policy to cuff and detain someone on say-so even in cases like this where it's a low-urgency (nonviolent) type of complaint, but it sure is shitty policy if so.

    2. Re:Thank God for the police... by coyote-san · · Score: 2

      Think about why the police are normally called to a store like Bogo Buy.

      Shoplifters.

      Forged checks, stolen credit cards, etc.

      The DA probably has written policies on how to deal with people accused of the normal crimes there. Someone accused of "fraud" (as in: using stolen credit cards or checks) may be looking at a *long* prison sentence so they'll be highly motivated to flee. Cuffing them makes sense.

      The problem is that the manager undoubtably knows the keywords and it sounds like he really pumped them in this case. It wasn't a case of misunderstanding and a customer possibly getting pissed off at the run-around. It was "fraud," and the police had to take him in....

      Only it wasn't fraud, and it can't reasonably be construed as fraud. (e.g., if he edited a copy of the BB website to create his own special sale -- BB is not disupting that the low price was offered.) The manager exploited the standard police procedures, and he should pay for it. Meanwhile the police and DA need to review their procedures to make sure that allegations of "fraud" only apply to attempts to pay, not attempts to get advertised prices.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    3. Re:Thank God for the police... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Someone accused of "fraud" ... may be looking at
      >a *long* prison sentence so they'll be highly
      >motivated to flee. Cuffing them makes sense.

      Well, if fraud is a serious offense in Georgia, we should be hearing soon about one Rod Hill spending the next few decades in prison. Right?

    4. Re:Thank God for the police... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALL of the web traffic that would be read by a guy nicked "cOdEgUru" indicated that this was a ridiculously low price, and most likely a mistake. Most people seemed go along with it just to see what would happen, and they all got e-mails telling them they weren't going to get the card. There was absolutely no reason to go in there and ask for it.

      "Fraud" might be an overly strong word for it, but he wasn't acting out of pure intentions. He went out of his way to see if he could scam a $130 GeForce 4 card.

      I'm sorry to call this guy out, because what happened to him certainly sucked badly. On the other hand, I can completely see how Best Buy employees might get pissed at umpteenth guy trying to job them.

    5. Re:Thank God for the police... by macdaddy · · Score: 2

      I'd have to disagree. If they officers didn't ask "The Indian" his side of the story, they failed him in the due process side of things. They didn't have any reason to cuff him. In every account he was non-violent and non-threatening. Now if the store manager lied about the incident to hype it (is there any question here?) then the officers might have had a reasonable reason to believe they needed to restrain him. However aren't they required to charge him with something and read him his miranda before cuffing him?

    6. Re:Thank God for the police... by gdyas · · Score: 2

      I understand your worries, but I think you're confusing detainment procedure (what the police do) with court procedure (what the court does). The police have no requirement of "due process", which is a legal term that only has meaning in a court case.

      In almost every police department, handcuffing people you're placing under arrest is standard procedure, nevermind their behavior before you arrest them. The purpose is to subdue the person you're arresting to prevent any attacks on the police officer or others before they happen. The handcuffs don't mean you're guilty and are by no means a form of mistreatment, just a precautionary measure. You never know how someone will react after being told they're under arrest - the most normal people sometimes lose their shit in such situations.

      Mr. Abraham made no comment in his post about Miranda, but I'm sure it was read to him, as it's another part of standard procedure when someone is arrested.

      You're also mistaken about having to charge someone. The charge in such an arrest was made by the store, being one of fraud which changed to trespass as the store managers tried to finesse their tale. The job of the police in this situation is NEVER to try & judge who's right & who's wrong - that's the court's job. They are supposed to figure out what the dispute is, and detain those who may have violated the law. So, when the police thought he may be charged with fraud, they arrested him. But then, the charges started to change with the stories of the BB management, and the officer in charge wisely decided to defuse the situation. I just think it was a good example of the system working.

      --

      The only tool you've got against psychosis is experience.

    7. Re:Thank God for the police... by Spoobie · · Score: 1
      However aren't they required to charge him with something and read him his miranda before cuffing him?

      Not at all. At the point they cuffed him, he was being detained, not arrested. The police are allowed to detain a person on probable cause while they are investigating and sorting things out. It sucks, but it's for the officers' safety and to keep (or at least discourage) the person from attempting to flee. If during the investigation they determine that the detainee has probably not committed a crime, they'll release him and he won't have an arrest record. If their probable cause is supported, the task of arresting the person is easier because he's already cuffed. Of course there are limits on the police's detainment powers (i.e. they can't detain someone indefinitely, and they are still responsible for the detainee's safety while he is in their custody.).

      BTW, IANAL etc.

  149. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by markmoss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Best Buy not only gave a verbal confirmation of the price, they accepted the order and CHARGED IT to the credit card. IANAL, but I can't imagine any twist to law where this _wasn't_ a valid contract. Generally, a sales contract is made when one party makes an offer to buy or sell at a certain price and the other accepts. More generally, contracts are made when there is "a meeting of minds". The advertising wasn't a valid offer (too many ways advertising can get screwed up, OTOH if there are a lot of such "errors" the state AG should conclude that they weren't errors and prosecute for bait-and-switch). The verbal confirmation of price was an offer, although it might not be possible to prove it really happened. But all that doesn't matter, because if the seller didn't make an offer, then placing the order for such and such at $129 was an offer by the _buyer_, and the seller accepted it by taking the order and the money. About the only way out of that is to claim that it is impossible to fulfill the order due to circumstances beyond your control (you don't have stock, and can't get it), and pretty clearly this isn't the case when stores all over the country have the item...

    So what is BB's real defense here? Maybe, "there couldn't have been a meeting of minds because we are mindless"? ;-)

  150. In Canada Future Shop = Best Buy by kson34 · · Score: 1

    Just a little thing for us Canadians to remember. Best Buy bought Future Shop last August (http://www.thestandard.com/wire/0,2231,23724,00.h tml)
    and completed the deal in November (http://www.newswire.ca/releases/November2001/05/c 3516.html).

    1. Re:In Canada Future Shop = Best Buy by AnimeFreak · · Score: 2

      To add to that, the Future Shops (the larger ones that is) will become Best Buys and Best Buy will be opening locations in various parts of the country.

      The smaller Future Shops are either going to be closed or they're going to remain as Future Shop.

  151. They never asked him to leave by Eric+Green · · Score: 2
    They asked him to go back to the manager's office, which he did. Then they called the police.


    Read the report.

    --
    Send mail here if you want to reach me.
  152. Not entire line of Craftsman products by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2

    The lifetime warranty only applies to hand tools, non-powered tools like wrenches and screwdrivers. The Craftsman power drills, saws, sanders, etc. all have a limited warranty- don't remember how long but it's pretty standard.

    Of course, I don't abuse my power tools, but break enough screwdrivers to make buying at Sears worthwhile.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    1. Re:Not entire line of Craftsman products by rark · · Score: 1

      Yup. And they don't care if the reason you broke that screwdriver is because you thought it would make a great prybar, or you were using it to drive out a bearing race.

      But even better, if you find (in a junk pile, in a thirft store, in a pawn shop, doesn't matter) a craftsman tool that is rusted to hell, broken or both, you can haul it to sears and they'll give you a new one.

      Truly wonderful, those things are.

  153. Hardly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I buy often at Best Buy. Why? Because the people working the floor there, at least at the local one, don't spew lines of bullshit at me when I buy computer-related things.

    Like when I bought my laptop. I pointed out my distaste for Win XP. The guy noted it'd have to be custom-ordered to get something else on it, and at the least, XP included a bit better security than, say, 98. Which indeed it does. He didn't go on a long spew about the virtues of Microsoft, he didn't confuse Ram and CPU, and he didn't do any of the countless things I've seen done by people in Circuit City, Boscov's, and elsewhere.

    Above all, you know, I got a damned good price on it.

    At any rate, wtf is the problem here? Are people stupid? Do they think a GF4 of that quality is going to sell for that low? My freakin' MX cost more than that.

    Do people not realize mistakes get made? Do people not realize when looking at a price that's too good to be true, it usually is?

    Do people not read the fscking lines that say, "Not responsible for typos, etc., rights to cancel orders, etc."?

    Jesus H. Christ.

  154. Best Buy Ate my Balls by geriatricgeek · · Score: 1

    Dont complain until you've been disabled by this testicular bad experience involving a digital camera. This poor sod has been making a worldwide search for his balls since 1997 AD. http://www.angelfire.com/il/AteMyBalls/bestbuy.htm l

    1. Re:Best Buy Ate my Balls by redog · · Score: 1

      You have Louisiana listed as a safe Zone and its NOT!!!! I bought a UPS that didnot work from Buest Buy In Lafayette Louisiana. Not only did it not work it actually took down my computers every 2 or 3 hours. after owning it for only 3 days I brought it back and bought another UPS frome somewhereelse. I returned to Buest Buy for a mouse 3 days later to see My old Broken UPS on the shelf!!!! I know it was the same one from the scars I left on the box half crushing it after removing the contents. I was amazed that they would put it back on the shelf all crushed up looking. --my 2 cents

    2. Re:Best Buy Ate my Balls by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2

      Fry's Electronics does this too.

      Every motherboard I have ever purchased there has been used, and is usually broken.

      --

      "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

    3. Re:Best Buy Ate my Balls by uberdood · · Score: 2

      gee, too bad. every motherboard i bought from Fry's has rocked.

      --
      "Population 1,656"
  155. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not ANYWHERE NEAR false advertising. False advertising is when you try to take someone's money and scam them. As far as I understand, Best Buy promptly returned the customers' money, and made no attempt to keep it. The only thing they did is cancel a few people's orders. As far as I know, that is perfectly legal. For example, many web shops or mail order places will not honor orders when they are out of stock. I haven't seen anyone bitch and moan about that, so why is everyone bitching and moaning about this??

  156. Agree with Reality Master by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grow up, people.

    Something I remember from my law school days: an advertisement is just an "offer to sell" it does not create any sort of legally binding obligation at all. Get over it. Merchants make errors all the time. Now, if they want to avoid bad publicity, they usually honor it, but that's a business decision. There are no "laws" being broken and they have not breached any sort of contract.

    Jesus. What a bunch of bitching about nothing.

  157. BestBuy has a low profit margin on video cards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best Buy does not make much money on video cards at all. Those video cards wholesale very close to the retail amount. If they had shipped 2000 cards at even a $200 loss, we are talking about $400000. I know though that they don't even make that much on those cards.
    I have to agree though that they should have shipped those cards to the customers, at least at a discount so they wouldn't have lost as much money, but could have at least kept most of the buyers happy.

  158. Everybody wants something for nothing.. by talon77 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Bah. Of course it was a typo. It says the card is listed at $139, for a savings of $200. Show me where in heck you see a geforce4-ti4600 listed for $339? it would be more like $250-300 savings if this were legit. It was a mistake made by best buy, they corrected it.. and now a whole bunch of dirty criminals are finding screen shots of the mistake and trying to commit fraud with it. It is BS. Its a good card, if you can't afford to buy it, then don't. But quit trying to cheat your way into getting a cheaper one.

    1. Re:Everybody wants something for nothing.. by Skapare · · Score: 2

      The card has a normal retail price of $399.99. But it's not unusual for discounters, like Best Buy often claims to be, to offer something that retails for $399.99 at a price of $339.99 regularly (and this at $129.99 at a $200 super savings). I very often see hardware discounted like this and sometimes buy. Then occaisionally some equipment is on sale for really awesome prices. Several years ago I saw a Philips brand SCSI CD-R recorder which normally sold for $349.95 on sale for $109.something (they often have some weird pennies in the prices and I think it's a code of some sort) at CompUSA. No rebate required. So I bought one (of 4 in stock) and took it home to make sure it would work in Linux. It worked fine. I went back the next day to buy another for a friend. All were sold, though the price sticker was still there. I asked a clerk when more would be in. He called the manager who said that was just a sale to get rid of stock that wasn't selling. Well, that's believable; I had no reason to question him on it, even though I'd never seen the product in the store before (and regularly visited every 3 or 4 weeks). I've also seen ultra low prices on some products just to get people into the store. I would believe that someone actually decided to sell the card at that ultra low price, and someone else later may have found that they had a contractual obligation to NOT discount that product or brand, perhaps not so deeply (such pricing often gives the impression the product isn't moving, or is about to be replaced, which stalls sales elsewhere that it isn't deeply discounted).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  159. The problem with disclaimers... by gdyas · · Score: 2

    A disclaimer is a statement of the rights and reponsibilities the company believes it has & doesn't have. It is not a statement of law. Just because a person or institution claims they have a right to do something doesn't mean they have the right to do it. I could "reserve the right" to kill anyone who steps on my property on sight, but I'm still a murderer liable to be punished if I actually do it.

    In pretty much all states there are laws against false advertising. Exceptions have been made for "obvious mistakes", but as has been shown by other info here, Best Buy was not commiting an error, but trying to backtrack on a special offer that got a little too much attention. It appears they probably did mean to honor this deal, but had changed their minds when it got too pricey for them.

    --

    The only tool you've got against psychosis is experience.

    1. Re:The problem with disclaimers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, I disagree, it sounds like it WAS an error, and when it was spotted it was fixed.

      Keep in mind that when Steve and them called BB they got people who were looking at the SAME info they saw online, those people are trained to look it up in the system and if its right, its right, unless otherwise posted. Which is why we end up back at the "if it seems to good to be true, it probably is" saying.

  160. The way telephone sales and support works by Eric+Green · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Okay, since you never worked for a business, and have no idea how telephone sales and support works, here's how it works:

    When you call, say, Best Buy.com's customer service number, you're talking to employees of Best Buy, right?

    *WRONG*!!! You're calling employees of a contracted customer service provider. These people are sitting in a tiny cubicle in a call center in Phoenix, Arizona or Gary, Indiana and provide sales and customer service for several different companies. They are provided with scripts and access to the advertising copy and price database for each company they're supporting. If you ask them a question about a price on the advertising copy, guess what they do -- they read it right off the web site right back at you! At least, until somebody notices that hey, we're getting a lot of inquiries about this product, it's time to push this inquiry upstream to actual Best Buy employees.

    Now, of course this is shitty customer service. The fact that it is standard industry practice doesn't make it any less shitty. Frankly, I do not buy from Best Buy, and in fact have a one-sentence statement on my web site saying, "Shopping at Worst Buy is the worst thing you can do". But the point is that an employee of a 3rd party contract firm reading mistaken advertising copy back to you does not make the mistaken advertising copy any less mistaken.

    And yes, if I'm going by the nearby Krispy Kreme and see them advertising a dozen donuts for 12 cents, I'll go in and ask them about it. If they sell me the donuts for 12 cents, great. If they say, "Whoops! Bad sign!" and hurriedly rush out and change it to say "$1.20", I'd happily pay $1.20 for a dozen Krispy Kremes (of course, the real price is more like $6 for a dozen of those sinful but utterly delicious things, but that's another story :-( ).

    -E

    --
    Send mail here if you want to reach me.
    1. Re:The way telephone sales and support works by terrymr · · Score: 2

      *WRONG*!!! You're calling employees of a contracted customer service provider. These people are sitting in a tiny cubicle in a call center in Phoenix, Arizona or Gary, Indiana and provide sales and customer service for several different companies. They are provided with scripts and access to the advertising copy and price database for each company they're supporting. If you ask them a question about a price on the advertising copy, guess what they do -- they read it right off the web site right back at you! At least, until somebody notices that hey, we're getting a lot of inquiries about this product, it's time to push this inquiry upstream to actual Best Buy employees.

      Not WRONG - they may not be employees of best buy but are agents of best buy and therefore in law they are speaking for the company.

      And when a price says $129 (and implies you're saving $200) it looks less like a typo - if the math didn't add up it'd be more believable.

    2. Re:The way telephone sales and support works by 0x20 · · Score: 1

      OK. You obviously did not read the article, so let me expand my analogy for you, and explain the concept of "bait-and-switch" at the same time.

      Say the donut shop with the 12-cent sign sells 200 dozen donuts on an average day.

      What if you went into the donut shop and asked them about the sign, and the manager sold you the donuts for 12 cents? Fine, right? Everybody makes mistakes!

      But what if they didn't take down the sign, and let the next 25 people buy 2 dozen donuts for 24 cents?

      What if they told the 25 people after that that they were out of donuts, but gave them rainchecks entitling them to a dozen for 12 cents when they made more? And STILL didn't take down the sign?

      What if they then took down the sign and told the next 25 people that the price was a mistake, but they would like to make amends by only charging them $2.00 per dozen - well below the usual retail price of $3.00, but still way above the donut shop's cost of $1.00?

      And by this time, they had a line going around the block twice, with 4,000 people who had seen the 12 cent sign, waiting to buy a dozen donuts at 12 cents?

      Even if 1/2 of the people wouldn't buy the donuts for $2.00 when they got to the register, that's 2000 dozen donuts sold at a profit on a day when they would normally have sold 200 dozen. They still made a killing that day because of the sign.

      That's why it is illegal to refuse to sell your products at the advertised price, and why disclaimers about printed pricing errors so often fail to hold up in court.

      Best Buy pulled all those tricks and more, and the people they swindled deserve to get their merchandise at the price they paid for it.

      Please read the article before lauching into another patronizing spiel about a tangential point. Statement on your website or no, Best Buy appears to have pulled the wool over your eyes on this one too.

    3. Re:The way telephone sales and support works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *WRONG*!!! You're calling employees of a contracted customer service provider. These people are sitting in a tiny cubicle in a call center in Phoenix, Arizona or Gary, Indiana and provide sales and customer service for several different companies.

      And how exactly the fuck am I supposed to know (or give a shit) about this. I call a number on BB's page, I consider myself to be talking to BB, regardless if the guy on the horn is in Oakland or Bangladesh. Why the hell would I want to spend time determining the business relationship of the phone-answerer and the business? It's not as if BB said, in large letters in the ad, "For further info on pricing, call 'Whiners R Us', an independent contractor who does not speak authoritatively for BB."

  161. Everybody get in touch with Best Buy by Petronius · · Score: 2, Informative




    Contact Best Buy NOW


    and let them know what you think of them. Tell them you read it on /. Tell them you'll never buy from them ever again!

    Years ago, I sent 10 letters to every address I could find at Intuit to complain about their crappy software and customer service, 6 months later I received a handwritten letter of apology and a free copy of the software. I bet many people got their ass whipped for not giving a shit before it got the the Prez of Customer Service...

    --
    there's no place like ~
    1. Re:Everybody get in touch with Best Buy by Skapare · · Score: 2

      /. readers tend to be well informed people. Hence they don't buy the extended warranties. Since Best Buy trims prices on merchandise usually to cost (and sometimes less to trick people into the store), they make no money unless the consumer buys the extended warranty. Thus, they would not be hurting if /. readers avoid Best Buy.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  162. Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Does anybody remember the uproar that occurred a few years ago with buy.com? They "accidentally" posted an incorrect price for 21" monitors. They refused to honor the price and were taken to court. They had to pay everyone's money back plus $20 - 50 a piece. Although I got money out of the deal, I was pretty pissed.

  163. Best Buy Blows. by raygundan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been screwed by these folks, but never as badly as this fellow. But just to add to the friendly Best-Buy bashing going on, here's the short version of my worst Best Buy experience:

    1. Purchased open-box Viewsonic PF700 at a $150 savings. Lovely monitor, and there was a big sticker on the box that says Best Buy will uphold the manufacturer's warranty since the box was open.

    2. 3 months later, monitor fails. Looks really awful-- blurry, hand-sized dark splotches, distortion.

    3. Take monitor to Best Buy for warranty service/replacement-- am asked if I degaussed the monitor. I say "yes, several times" but am ignored. Monitor is degaussed in my presence once with degauss button (no help) and once with external degaussing tool. (also no help-- big surprise)

    4. Best Buy tells me they don't service these monitors, and to go pick out a replacement.

    5. I go to monitor section, but apparently BB does not carry this monitor anymore. In fact, they don't carry ANY MONITORS at this time that meet the PF790's dot pitch/resolution/refresh rate specs. NONE.

    6. I ask for a refund.

    7. Denied. Store credit only.

    8. I email corporate and ask for a refund.

    9. Denied.

    10. Repeat steps 8 and 9 several times.

    11. Took home KDS monitor that is best equivalent. Now I'm out the price of the monitor and have an inferior product thanks to the wonderful customer service of best buy.

    At the time, I was in college and could not afford a lawsuit. I do not shop their anymore-- but I do hope that another person screwed by their awful service sues them and wins.

  164. Re: wrong item in the box at Best Buy by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    It's interesting you bring this story up!

    I had a situation happen to me some years back that's similar. When the v.90 56K modems were brand new, I went to the local Best Buy store and purchased a Zoom internal.

    After I got home and opened it (shrink-wrapped and all), I found a no-name brand 2400 baud internal modem in the box.

    I immediately went back to the store and complained to customer service. Of course, everyone acted like I was making it up, trying to scam them out of a new modem. Finally, the store manager agreed to give me another modem - but I was treated like a criminal the whole time. Even as I walked out the door, everyone behind the counter was glaring at me and whispering things to each other.

    I called corporate HQ and complained about my situation and treatment, but the lady on the phone actually laughed at me - and obviously blew me off.

    At least I got a little satisfaction eventually, because not too long after this happened to me, that store got shut down by corporate. (It was a store located in Florissant, Missouri - and it made the national news when they became the subject of a fraud investigation. Turns out almost all the employees were working together to steal products from the store over a 1 year + period of time. They had to fire everyone and bring in new employees from corporate to run the place for a while, until it was shut down.)

  165. Bastards, try Gooogling it by geriatricgeek · · Score: 1

    Do a Google search. Type in Best Buy Ate my Balls. Best Buy actually threatened him in his guestbook. This poor guy has been seriously stressed out & BALLESS since 1997 and Anglefire have taken down his homepage but ya can still get it off Google. Or try typing the url in on the WAYBACK machine...Cheers GeriatricGeek

  166. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by scm · · Score: 1

    I thought the law said that they can only charge your credit card when the item is shipped... I may be remembering incorrectly, but if it's true, it seems that they are charging the cards before shipping...

  167. Its not "false arrest". by Gannoc · · Score: 2
    False arrest is when the cops arrest you for no reason. The cops arrested you for an excellent reason: They had an accusation and proof of fraud.

    You need a civil suit against Best Buy, and you might be able to file charges against the manager.

    1. Re:Its not "false arrest". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is false arrest (on the part of the manager or whoever filed the charges). Or at least it could be very easily argued...
      It depends on how it plays out. If it is determined that they affected the arrest, it's false arrest, if it is determined that they filed a false report, it's 'filing a false report' (duh, or whatever the legal term is).
      That is best left to the police and D.A. (if he complains to them) to decide...probably not worth pursuing himself.

      It isn't false arrest on the part of the officers because they were acting on a statement from the person pressing charges. Then again, no one is saying it was the cop's fault.

      The 'false arrest' charge is nothing more than counter intimidation, anyway...
      The real damage comes with the civil case...not the criminal case.

      IANAL, of course.

    2. Re:Its not "false arrest". by coyote-san · · Score: 2

      I don't know Georgia's law, but in most states *anyone* can arrest someone if they witnessed them commit a crime. This is a limited arrest - they can only detain the person until the cops arrive - but if they deliberately lie about witnessing a crime then it's "false arrest."

      On top of that, sworn police officers normally have limited immunity to false arrest charges. This isn't because cops are really getting a free ride, it's a deliberate tradeoff of letting police agencies deal with questionable cases internally instead of having the courts clogged with complaints by half the people arrested. Civilians don't have this limited liability.

      If the manager witnessed someone grab merchandise, stuff it into his jacket, and attempt to walk out the door then he would certainly be within his rights to detain the person until the cops arrived.

      If the manager witnessed someone attempting to use checks with the name "Bob Smith" even though all of his ID said "Jim Jones," he would be within his rights to detain the person.

      But accusing someone of "fraud" for attempting to peacefully redeem a coupon from the BB website is an entirely different situation.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    3. Re:Its not "false arrest". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real damage comes with the civil case...not the criminal case.

      Yeah, I think O.J. will back you up on that one. :-)

  168. United Airlines by bombom · · Score: 2, Informative

    A couple of years ago a similar thing happned at United Airlines.
    Basically, a technical glitch in the United Airlines internet reservation system is reported to have allowed 120 customers to obtain round-trip tickets between Chicago and Bombay for between USD$139 and USD$179. The tickets would usually have cost more than USD$999.
    After bitching about it for a while, United gave in to customer demands. That's what I call a good fair company!

    http://news.airwise.com/stories/2001/08/99856734 0. html

    --
    IOException - Can't Speak
  169. Screwed by Besy Buy in GA by rhadc · · Score: 1

    As a resident of the Atlanta, GA metro area, I used to frequent the Best Buy stores quite a bit. After they lied (on multiple points) to me about what was covered on an extended warrantee, then not covering what they 'verbally' told me, I stopped doing business with them. I was able to recover some of my money - around $250. I still lost about $90 in the deal. I never persued it any further. I should have read the fine print and ignored the sales rep, who was probably purposefully misinformed. However, knowing the stores in the area, this does not surprise me at all.

    Maybe I will go up to that Best Buy and ask them about this one! I'd love to get their response and post a follow-up.

    rhadc

    1. Re:Screwed by Besy Buy in GA by Skapare · · Score: 2

      Be sure you are accompanied by some friends. A lot of friends. A lot of big friends. We don't need to know what race they are.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Screwed by Besy Buy in GA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically, you were stupid enough to buy an extended warranty.

  170. FYI, not that easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course nothing is ever sure in the court system, but juries are generally sympathetic to cases of consumers suing big corperations for being assholes.

    This is a common misconception about cases like this. From what you read and hear, it does seem like you say, but the real fact is that it's exactly the opposite at the appellate level and all those cases you hear of people suing for huge damages from corporations get tossed out or massively reduced during the appeal. It's actually pretty harse and unfair, and we never hear about it because the cases aren't news anymore when it happens!

    1. Re:FYI, not that easy by coyote-san · · Score: 2

      So what? By that time the manager who thinks it's cool to detain people (false arrest) and file false police reports will have been arrested himself, fired "for cause," and basically be greeted with "oh, you're THAT guy? Are you gonna have us arrested if we don't give you this job? Get the hell out of my office!" during every job interview for the next decade or so.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  171. I sent BB.com & BB stores email... by Spoing · · Score: 2
    ...asking if what I heard was true. Want to do the same?
    1. Go here to send a note to Best Buy .com.

      Go here to send a note to Best Buy stores.

    Adding a link or a sample of the stories told here might not be a bad idea.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  172. Guess again, Implied Warranty of Merchantability by Larry_Dillon · · Score: 2

    "Every time goods are bought and sold, a sales contract is created: the buyer agrees to pay, and the seller agrees to accept, a certain price in exchange for a certain item or number of items." ...

    "Implied warranties come in two general types: merchantability and fitness. An implied warranty of merchantability is an unwritten and unspoken guarantee to the buyer that goods purchased conform to ordinary standards of care and that they are of the same average grade, quality, and value as similar goods sold under similar circumstances. In other words, merchantable goods are goods fit for the ordinary purposes for which they are to be used. "

    Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to apply to software.

    See:
    http://www.wld.com/conbus/weal/wimpwarr.ht m

    --
    Competition Good, Monopoly Bad.
  173. ...and a response... by Spoing · · Score: 2

    Rep's first name is [XXXXX]'ed out. Otherwise, this is untouched;

    ----------

    Thank you for contacting Best Buy about this store shopping experience. I'm
    [XXXX] with Customer Care.

    We understand that hearing a statement like this can be difficult.

    To accurately respond to your e-mail, we have forwarded your message to the
    Best Buy Consumer Relations department. Our Consumer Relations
    Representatives are specially trained to resolve any questions or concerns
    you may have about shopping at a Best Buy retail store along with many of
    the services Best Buy offers. You may expect to receive a response from your
    Consumer Relations Representative shortly.

    Thank you for sharing your comments with Best Buy. Please do not hesitate to
    contact us with additional questions or concerns.

    Best wishes from Best Buy,
    [xxxx] and the Customer Care Team

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  174. Caveat Emptor by haze · · Score: 1

    Let the Buyer Beware. The law states that the buyer makes an offer to buy a product, and the seller then has the right to accept or refuse that offer. When the seller says "I'll sell this item for $100" and the buyer says "Yes". The contract is only half completed. The buyer at this point has made an offer to purchase the item for $100 and the seller still has to accept that offer. Once the seller accepts the buyer's offer, then the contract is completed.

  175. Only problem is... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    I've found Circuit City to be worse, much worse. They've refused to accept perfectly good checks, take back merchandise under warranty, and been out of stock. I'm trying to think of other things, but can't off-hand. A Best Buy just opened here, and I had a better experience.

  176. Intentional incoherence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be willing to bet that the spelling and grammatical errors in the original post were intentional. It's possible - easy, actually - to determine patterns in speech and writing, and to identify people based on these patterns... Not as damning as a fingerprint, but pretty close; people have been tried and convicted based on this sort of forensic analysis. If it's strong enough evidence to send someone to jail, it's strong enough evidence to get someone fired.

    If I were going to post something that my boss wasn't going to be happy about, you can bet I'd mask my writing style as well.

  177. Reminds me of the Buy.com 19" Hiatchi's for $164. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of a few years ago when Buy.com had the 19" Hitachi montitors posted for $164.50 and thousands of people ordered, but they only shipped to a couple hundred people. I never got mine, but someone filed a class action lawsuit against them and anyone that ordered a monitor was automatically added to it. Then like 3 years later I received for a check for like ~$40.00

    http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,17803, 00 . tml

  178. My adventure at best buy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I made Best Buy honor a price that rang up at $50 more at the register than the item (a portable MP3 player) was clearly and plainly marked on the store's shelves. They immediately pulled all remaining quantity of this item off the shelf along with the bigger-than-dallas price tag, tossed them into a basket and carried them off to the service desk area, never to be seen again. The sales drone and the store manager were both pissed off at me for discovering their screw-up, but I did leave the store with my happily purchased (for $49 instead of $99) new MP3 player. They took down my name, but have not retaliated against me in any way, in fact I've returned to the store on many occasions and have bought several hundred dollars worth of other merchandise from them since then.... have never seen that particular model of MP3 player on their shelves again however :-)

  179. Dell did the same in Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not too long ago, Dell wrongfully advertised their Dimension 8100 1.5 Ghz system in a magazine at about half the price that it was really worth... (some 1250 euros instead of 2500 euros). Because they advertised at that price, they are obliged to sell at that price... i'm posting from one now. After about 2 or 3 days, they refused to sell more, and they called in a law that prohibits them to sell with a loss... they cannot sell at a price lower than what it costs them to make it. I still got mine though ;-)

  180. Wholy sh*t! Did you look at the arrest report?! by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

    The store manager actually mislead the police and had the guy arrested claiming his online receipt was false. This is an absolute outrage. On top of this he got done for criminal trespass for being in a store! This is sickening. I hope this guy get's a good lawyer and sues the store and the manager. How low can a company sink?

    1. Re:Wholy sh*t! Did you look at the arrest report?! by Skapare · · Score: 2

      Be sure to go visit the Best Buy web site and do a search for terms like "arrest" and "consumer terrorism". Since their practice is to scare consumers into not asking for their rights (even when the manager could just say "no"), I'd classify it as a form of terrorism. I coined "consumer terroism" to distinguish it from a more serious form of lethal terrorism (which to my knowledge Best Buy has not done).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Wholy sh*t! Did you look at the arrest report?! by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      No you classified it as terrorism to evoke the visceral reaction to the word and associate their deet with a more heinous crime thereby exploiting the deaths of thousands murdered by real terrorism. We know what terrorism is. We don't need self serving nuts to hijack the word and present bad company behaviour as something worse than it is. They did what they did, what they did was not terrorism in any form.

    3. Re:Wholy sh*t! Did you look at the arrest report?! by Corydon76 · · Score: 1
      No you classified it as terrorism to evoke the visceral reaction to the word and associate their deet with a more heinous crime thereby exploiting the deaths of thousands murdered by real terrorism. We know what terrorism is. We don't need self serving nuts to hijack the word and present bad company behaviour as something worse than it is. They did what they did, what they did was not terrorism in any form.

      Oh, you mean like Congress, which came up with the term digital terrorism to describe criminal hacking, even though no person is ever physically harmed?

      Congress and your local law enforcement agency has already coopted the term terrorism. Deal with it. I see absolutely nothing wrong with the term consumer terrorism to describe what Best Buy did.

    4. Re:Wholy sh*t! Did you look at the arrest report?! by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      Two wrongs have never made a right. You're still a scum bag exploiting the deaths of thousands.

  181. Re:The excite by GafTheHorseInTears · · Score: 0

    643 Comments. Nice blackout, fucktards!

    --
    "You're just scared like a little white pussy. I'll fuck you till you love me, you faggot!"
  182. Wrongful imprisonment too by TekPolitik · · Score: 2
    Assuming what you said is true, then best buy did break the law.

    If they do what this store did, there would be an excellent case against the store for wrongful imprisonment - courts (and juries) tend to award huge damages for that - tens of thousands of dollars and more.

    The wrongful imprisonment here appears to be present in two places - it looks like the store held the guy for a while, and it looks like they pressured the cops to take him downtown (you can still sue the store for this even though it's not the store doing it, if they pressured the cops to do it)

    IANALY,TINLA

    1. Re:Wrongful imprisonment too by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Well there's that, and filing a false police report. (seems they backpedaled on the fradulant reciept once he was at the police station and decided it was criminal tresspass when he was never asked to leave). I'd personally insist on the manager being arrested on charges of filing a false police report. From what I've read, the man should be fired and his most important phrase in his next career should be "would you like fries with that?"

      I'd own me a Best Buy store if this happened to me. Then I'd bulldoze it and sell the lot.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:Wrongful imprisonment too by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      I'd own me a Best Buy store if this happened to me. Then I'd bulldoze it and sell the lot.

      Um, can I have all the stuff inside it first?

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    3. Re:Wrongful imprisonment too by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      erm, I meant "Sell the lot" in a british "sell the lot of it" sort of way, but since your sig marks you as a despair.com customer, I'd prolly let ya take home a few things ;)

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    4. Re:Wrongful imprisonment too by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      In that case you might want to sell the lot and then bulldoze it. But hey, thanks!

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  183. BB sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked in a BB as a third-party vendor rep.

    I couldn't believe it. People would drive 4,5,6 hours to this BB, wide-eyed and excited, all ready to buy their first computer. Most of these customers knew absolutely nothing about PCs, only that "BB was the place to get one."

    Now, in an utopian society, knowledgable experts would be on hand to get them the best computer for their needs.

    Then again, we're talking about BB.

    BB sales reps and myself were repeatedly instructed to try and sell the most expensive models available. Plus, if you weren't able to tack on the extra hundreds of dollars from the service plan on top of every PC sale, you weren't trying hard enough. The worst part was the bullfertilizer some manager told me to tell the customers about the peripherals. Instead of selling a USB cable that cost 10 bucks everywhere else, the customers should buy the new, gold-plated USB cable that was 40 bucks instead. Seems that the gold plating on the cable helped boost data transfer rates.

    I just don't get it. BB is in a position that if they provided good information and helped their customers make intelligent decisions, they'd have huge market share and the respect of a lot of people. But instead, $$ and squeezing the last buck out of every computer newbie is the order of the day. How sad!

  184. Re: please, please get a lawyer by raresilk · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I am a lawyer, and if I were licensed to practice in the state of Georgia I would be sending you an email right now, inviting you to become my client. Since I'm not (California only), I urge you very strongly to consult a local lawyer and pursue whatever rights you may have under Georgia law, with particular attention to the tort of "false arrest." According to your story, what happened to you was wrongful, and quite possibly illegal as well.

    --
    No, no, no. This is not a sig.
  185. I already said that. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I already said that under certain circumstances they have to take the item back, meaning exactly this.

    If it's not fit for sale or up to standard or sold under false preteses, they must take the item back.

    This is NOT the kind of return I meant. A great many people think they have some legal right to return anything for any reason if it's unopened or otherwise recently purchased, just because they don't like it, or the color doesn't match, or whatever. That's what I was talking about.

  186. Mod this up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody mod #3404197 up? It will cut a lot of the wasted commentary.

  187. Re:Disclaimer? - Not Necessary by markmoss · · Score: 2

    Imagine if I'm setting up a web site for a car dealership and I accidently put down "$147.50" instead of "$14,750.00" for a brand new car. Yes, but if I walk in and hand you $147.50 for the new Ford Escort AND YOU TAKE IT, you just made a sale. I made an offer, and you accepted it. That's all that is needed to create a contract. Hand me the keys or you're in breach...

    Since BB were taking the orders, and charging the credit cards in many cases, same principle.

    Now, I wouldn't expect to actually get the car unless the business owner himself took the money and signed a receipt, because $147.50 is so low for a new car that it's obviously an error and not a proper "exchange of consideration", and the car dealer could reasonably claim that a salesman who made that deal exceeded his authority. However, considering the deep discounts we often see in web and mail order stores, $129 for a $329 or $400 card is not clearly an error or lack of consideration, and Best Buy would have a hell of a job claiming that their sales people weren't authorized to sell the card at this price after their computers accepted the order and billed the credit card. The only way they could get away with this is if people don't find it worthwhile taking them to court. And that doesn't work when enough people join the class action suit.

    Although it might be more fun for each of those several thousand people to go into small claims court instead, forcing bestbuy.com to send a representative to each and every hearing...

    Some posts have claimed that BB has made pricing "errors" like this in their printed and online catalogs quite often. That would make a case that the "errors" are indeed intentional, and also subject BB to prosecution for bait and switch.

    Disclaimer: IANAL, etc.

  188. lets see. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    • Store advertises a price of an item.
    • Store confirms, by phone, the price of an item.

    • Store gives you a much higher price on that item, when you arrive there.
    • Store makes accusations of fraud when you demand that they honor their advertising.

    This is not a missing digit or misplaced decimal point, but is an intentional act. The point of multiple or punitive damages is to discourage future acts of a similar nature.


    Usually there is no insurance available for a store committing fraud.

  189. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by frost22 · · Score: 2

    Correct.

    An ad constitutes a solicitation for offers.
    An order is an offer.
    Charging (or delivery, btw) of the goods constitues acceptance of that offer.

    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  190. This is a pain... by Danse · · Score: 2

    I'm running out of places to shop. I haven't shopped at Circuit City since the DivX fiasco. It wasn't just because of the fact that it was a horrible product, but because their salespeople actually flat-out lied to me about the product. Now, after this bullshit that Best Buy is pulling, I won't shop there either. Not unless they honor the price they advertised and pay some restitution to the guy they had arrested. Guess I'll have to be shopping online only now. There aren't any other similar stores in my city, so I don't have much choice.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    1. Re:This is a pain... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Worse than that. They're SELECTIVELY not-honoring the price. Some people get it, some people don't. There's documented proof. I've never had a problem there, but I hope there's lots of pain and suffering ahead for the manager of that store in particular, and the marketing weasels that perpetrated this in the first place in general.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:This is a pain... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2

      How did Circuit City's salespeople lie to you about DivX?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    3. Re:This is a pain... by Danse · · Score: 1

      They told me that it wouldn't send any information about me back to the company. They also said that DivX discs would have the same quality and features as DVDs. And it took me several minutes to get them to even admit that I wouldn't be able to view a disc that I had previously watched if I took it to someone else's place to watch. They kept trying to refer to the unlocked discs when I specifically told them I wasn't talking about the unlocked discs. Unlocking a DivX disc was going to be at least as expensive as buying a regular DVD and therefore made no sense.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    4. Re:This is a pain... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
      I'm sorry you had a bad experience with DivX - it was very misunderstood by almost everyone, including tech experts and CC salespeople. In fact, when it was unveiled at CEBIT, the supposedly tech-savvy reporters claimed that it streamed the movie over the 2400 baud modem!

      You're correct that they lacked the special features of 'real' DVDs. Certainly I think the intent to have additional content was there, but it never gained enough momentum to justify the added time it would've taken to add the special features. It was probably more important to get lots of popular titles out at all first.

      As for the video quality, what the person you talked to may have meant was that the video quality was the same (no loss due to encryption).

      I'm not sure what information you were worried about being sent back to DivX - I think it only sent the ID number of your player and the serial numbers of the movies you'd watched since its last call home. The box itself knew which movies had been played on it, so it could handle the 48 hr viewing period autonomously.

      I truly enjoyed my DivX player for what it was. I could pick up 5 or 6 movies I'd thought I'd like to see, stick them on the shelf, and watch them when I got around to it, perhaps months later. We had a DivX sharing webpage at work where we could borrow co-workers discs. It worked out well!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  191. Yeah? When was the manager arrested? by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    If the police now agree that he not only commited no crime, but that the manager shouldn't have called them in to arrest him for fraud, then when was the manager arrested for making a false police report and false arrest? (The manager's detainment of the individual, not the police taking custody.)

    Talk is cheap. If they really think the manager was totally out of line, they should arrest the asshole to send a clear message to the other managers in town that detaining a shoplifter is one thing, detaining someone asking difficult questions is an entirely different thing.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  192. What does Best Buy say? by nabucco · · Score: 2

    I was curious about this so I decided to call Best Buy.

    First I called 1-888-BESTBUY and connected to customer relations. I told her I have a news mailing list and was interested in a comment with regards to this. I asked her about the incident and she said she didn't know anything. She suggested I call the store or corporate headquarters's PR department.

    I called corporate headquarters, 952-947-2000. They closed at 5PM CDT.

    I called the store at 770-939-7660 and connected to customer service. I mentioned my mailing list and the arrest and she asked if I wanted background information and I said yes. She came back in a minute and told me that she couldn't comment and that I'd have to call corporate PR.

    With the store directing people to corporate PR, and customer relations not knowing anything, I guess people interested in writing news items about this will have to wait until tomorrow morning to get a response from Best Buy's corporate PR department.

    Have they already decided not to press forward with fraud/trespass charges? I guess I'll find out tomorrow.

  193. Lied to the cops twice. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

    I dunno about you but I am furious about this. These bast#rds actually changed their charge from fraud or trespass after the fact. So they have him arrested telling the cops he has a fraudulent receipt, then they later have the charge changed to trespass claiming he refused to leave, which is a transparent fabrication.

    Buy from best buy and have them throw a series of trumped up charges at you. God I hope this guy gets a good lawyer and sues them for false arrest. Damn, I'm FURIOUS at this, the dirty SOBs, I hope they arrest the damned store manager for perjury and perverting the course of justice.

    1. Re:Lied to the cops twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I hope they arrest the damned store manager for
      >perjury and perverting the course of justice.

      The perjury and obstruction of justice can't happen until and unless there is a trial.

      Knowingly making a false statement to a police officer in the State of Georgia is the most serious offense that's been committed here.

      If I were the customer in this case, Rod Hill would be in jail today, no question about it.

    2. Re:Lied to the cops twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I dunno about you but I am furious about this.

      I am afraid to go to Georgia, because this
      infamous Rod Hill person is roaming the streets,
      even though he is a known criminal who routinely
      lies to law enforcement authorities to support his
      racist agenda.

      It's not enough to ask that he be fired by Best Buy. I want him prosecuted to the full extent of the law. What are the penalties in Georgia for
      knowingly and willfully lying to a police officer?

      Why is this not a hate crime?

      I firmly believe that Rod Hill belongs behind bars. Forever, or for the longest amount of time
      Georgia law allows for this crime. If his family will suffer because of this, well, "if you can't do the time, don't do the crime." Boo hoo.

    3. Re:Lied to the cops twice. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      Oh please. Take your hate crime agenda and shove it. The fact that he lied does not make this a hate crime you moron. What are you the thought police? Locked up forever? You're as bad as he is you fruitbar.

  194. do we need to know the race? no.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is the original post mentioning the fellow's race? seems entirely beside the point to me.

    btw, best buy is a horrible chain; it has been that way for years. doesn't everyone know that by now? just shop somewhere else. you might just as well whine about how crappy GM cars are... or you could just shut up and go buy a honda.

  195. This illustrates a *big* problem with the web... by aquarian · · Score: 2

    A big problem with the web is that a company can make a quick change of a web page, and claim it was that way all along. I've seen this happen before- a web special being offered, which then mysteriously disappears. Or a change in some fine print, a cutomer agreement, a license, terms of service, etc.

    I'm not sure what we can do to protect ourselves against this. Saving web pages? Having third parties (like Alexa) keep archives of corporate sites? It's an interesting problem.

  196. Buy.com settled after being sued by cuberat · · Score: 1

    I know because I got a check as part of the class-action settlement. Still have the stub somewhere...it was for like $50, but it was an actual check, not 'store credit' or 'Buy.com dollars' or anything like that. Didn't get the monitor, tho, and it took over two years for the suit to be settled. But they did get sued, did settle, and had to pay out money to make it right. Sometimes going to court is the right thing to do.

    --

    I'll tell you what the 'effect' is! It's pissing me off!

  197. Problems with Best Buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've also had my problems with Best Buy, and I have decided never to do business with them again. Luckily, my problem was small, but the way it was handled removed any confidence I have that Best Buy can handle legitimate customer service issues.

    I bought a simple and cheap ($19.95) home layout CAD program. My computer was listed as meeting the requirements of the program. The program would not run on my computer. I attempted to exchange the program for a different (and more expensive, with me paying the difference) program. The Best Buy employees told me that software can only be exchanged for a new copy of the same program. I explained again that the program was defective (either it was actually defective, or the system requirements on the packaging were defective) and that it would not work on my computer.

    To make a long story shorter, I never received a satisfactory solution. I asked to talk to the manager, but there was "no manager in the store", I wrote to customer service, but twice received canned replies that didn't address the problem. I finally gave up because the amount was so small.

    The bottom line: I lost $20, Best Buy lost a lot more. Since my problems with them I've bought thousands of dollars worth of merchandise that Best Buys sells. They didn't even enter into consideration as a vendor. I won't get burnt twice by them.

    1. Re:Problems with Best Buy by Skapare · · Score: 2

      If you don't buy the extended warranties, then Best Buy didn't lose anything at all by you going to another store to buy your merchandise. Profits are scraped to the bone, often to negative, on actual merchandise, and recovered in the extended warranty, which is what all the employees are trained to sell you.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  198. Insight are good guys! by Mike+the+Mac+Geek · · Score: 3, Informative

    They put a 200$ motherboard up for 21 bucks on monday.

    Dual P3 with built in RAID.

    I jumped on it, and got one. After I ordered, the price was put back up to 229.00. Luckily, the good people at Insight held up their end of it, and shipped the board. These people will be getting a LOT more business from me. This is the kind of customer service that really shows they value me, even when I get the better of them. Goodbye Best Buy, Hello Insight!

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- ---- The man, the myth, the something or other.
  199. Indian American? by serutan · · Score: 2

    Rod Hill, Store Manager for Best Buy... informed police that Abraham Cherian, an Indian American, was trying to rip off the store...

    Indian American? What race was the store manager? Or do we not need to know that for some reason?

    1. Re:Indian American? by Skapare · · Score: 2

      We don't need to know the race of the store manager. It is well known that there are idiots in every race.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Indian American? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Indian American? What race was the store manager? Or do we not need to know that for some reason?
      It's not necessary. It's quite obvious that an asshole like that can only be white...
  200. They are NOT required to honor the price by Galvatron · · Score: 2
    I'm not sure where people are getting the idea that Best Buy has some sort of obligation to sell the card at the advetised price. Misprints, typos, and other mistakes are NOT binding. United Airlines had a website glitch that allowed a couple hundred people to reserve flights to Paris for $1 over the course of an hour before the problem was corrected. They were NOT required to honor that. That's the law, folks, sorry. If they already charged you, things *might* be different, but most online retailers don't charge you until they're ready to ship, so I doubt that applied in this case. Many retailers will honor mistakes anyway, if it's not too big of an error, because they want to create good will, but that is their choice, not an obligation. That is, I think, a good thing.

    Now, some have claimed that Best Buy did this on purpose in order to get more people to shop there. This is indeed an illegal bait and switch, but only if you can show that they did it intentionally. Hope this clears things up.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  201. Online Petition by Lucabrasi · · Score: 1

    Just made a petition to boycott Best Buy. Sign it here and let them know this is not acceptable!

    http://www.petitiononline.com/BBBC/petition.html

  202. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by tps12 · · Score: 2
    Hey, restricted speech is restricted speech. The real problems I have with banning false advertising relate to how it can be defined and its implications for individuals. Basically, most advertising is misleading, so not only is it hard to distinguish truly "false" advertisements from just tricky ones, but having laws about it encourages consumers to have more faith in advertisements than is really warranted, IMO. Also, where do you draw the line between false advertising and normal lying? Suppose I'm selling my car in a classified ad. Now I can't claim that it goes 500mph. But if I'm talking to my neighbor and he asks how fast my car goes, I can tell him 500mph. And what if he's interested in buying it?

    Basically, it is impossible to legislate when lying "should" be illegal. I would rather have people be forced to be more skeptical, than limit speech.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  203. When all the legal crap is over .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll be able to get the cards for $29 !

    $100 profit for best buy, per awkward customer !

    Nice one, Best Buy !

  204. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by tps12 · · Score: 2
    If they charged the credit cards, they're screwed.

    Opposite situation: buyer misinterprets the true features of the product and purchases it for more than he would have spent had he been informed. Sure, the store may have a return policy, but I don't believe it is required to. I have definitely bought new products "as is" (RAM, e.g.). AFAIK, Best Buy doesn't require its customers to give it a product-back guarantee or anything, so assuming the customers didn't decide out of the goodness of their hearts (or to beat out competing customers?) to give the store some kind of warranty, I don't see how Best Buy has a leg to stand on.

    Lesson to retailers: precharging is evil. Don't do it. And if you do, be prepared to deal with it when you fuck up.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  205. Re:totally free! by zapfie · · Score: 1

    It's not a bug, it's a feature. ;)

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  206. not a contract by alanak · · Score: 1

    Best Buy has entered into a binding contract to sell the cards at the advertised price, and if they don't want to honor it, the people affected should take them to court (or contact their local Attorney General's office, which is what they appear to be doing).

    Well, crucial.com states several times when purchasing memory that it is NOT a binding contract. I'm sure most web retailers have it in their TOS that a purchase is not a contract until it's approved or something like that - so they can't be liable in situations like this.

    1. Re:not a contract by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what you say is true to an extent. According to the FTC though, for a TOS on a webpage to be enforcable it needs to be completely conspicuous and the person ordering needs to agree to the terms (ie, "please click 'I Agree' after reviewing our TOS to continue" when you are registering for an account). This is not the case on the Best Buy webpage. Not once thoughout the entire ordering process do they ever ask you to agree to their TOS. Nor is it conspicuous. It's not even directly on the ordering page. It is instead linked to by a small line of hypertext at the very bottom of the page. According to the FTC criteria, their TOS WILL NOT hold up in a court of law as legally binding.

  207. More Best Buy Screwups... by Maul · · Score: 2
    A few weeks ago I went to Best Buy looking for some speakers. I'm happy with non-high end stuff, so I was hoping Best Buy would be the place to go for something in the price range I was looking for. I found a set of decent speakers that were advertised on sale in a display. The display also had a reciever on it. The reciever did not have a price listed, and though I doubted that it was included, I decided to ask, just incase it was a clearance of an older year's model, or whatever. I began asking one salesperson about the speakers and reciever. As I was mid-sentence asking a question about them, she leaves for no clear reason. So I ask another salesperson. Finally, I ask if this advertised price includes both the reciever and the speakers, and he says, "Yes" rather quickly. So I have him ring me out. The whole time he is trying to sell me the "extended warranty" which I have to decline like 5 times in a row.


    When I got home, I checked in the store ads and online, and found that the speaker set and reciever were NOT not supposed to be sold together, and that I should have paid double for what I got in total.


    I wonder how Best Buy stays in business when the employees are complete morons like I dealt with. I'm not saying ALL Best Buy employees are morons, but it seems like quite a few don't really care about anything except selling the extended warranty from what I've experienced, and what I've heard from others.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    1. Re:More Best Buy Screwups... by Trekologer · · Score: 2

      All of the customer service problems that you and others (including myself) have faced are brought about by the existance of mass-market stores such as Best Buy. The electronic and computer hardware are sold right at cost. The store is making very little profit off of them. The real money is in the extended warranties which is just about 100% profit for the store. The mentality is that a sale without the extended warranty is a wasted sale. These stores don't need knowledgable exployees as long as they can say "Would you like the extended warranty? Its only..." If no one bought the extended warranty, Best Buy, Circuit City, CompUSA, and most other mass-market stores would be forced to close their doors.

      If you want to hurt these companies, go buy hardware on sale but NEVER, EVER buy the extended warranty.

    2. Re:More Best Buy Screwups... by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

      It's so true :(

      I went to BB to buy a cordless phone. I know basically the features I wanted, and wandered down to the cordless aisle, which looked very much like a bomb had gone off there about a week ago and still hadn't been cleaned up.

      All the demo phones were missing pieces or broken in some way, the phone I wound up getting wasn't on display, and was the last one sitting on the shelf, lucky break there, because it had the right features and the right price.

      I get up to the register (which is another whole story in itself, the endless tug of war between idiot customers and idiot cashiers) and when I'm asked if I want the extended warranty, I automatically decline, at which point the cashier goes hostile on me and rudely informs me that I should not bother coming back to the store if I have any problems with the phone.

      My other favorite was when I was buying some car stereo installation parts, I needed a wiring harness. Their mobile installation department had one in stock that I needed, but they were holding it for a customer who was already 3 hours late in showing up.

  208. You're looking at it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The store manager, Rod Hill, committed a malicious
    act of fraud against the State of Georgia, when he knowingly lied to the police.

    Furthermore, because the victim was a minority, Rod Hill committed a hate crime, because he lied to police in order to cause direct harm to the victim.

    Call for the arrest and prosecution of one Rod Hill. Forget Best Buy -- they made an honest mistake. Send Rod Hill to the penetentiary for 25 years to life for his racist hate crimes, if you want justice.

  209. "Best Buy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I personally have not shopped at Best Buy for years, since they screwed me over on a return (they took my receipt, the unopened DVD, and refused to give me any money). I'm sure there are a thousand other similar stores from disgruntled customers. (NOT "consumers"!)



    At any rate, if you think of their name not in terms of "This is the Best Buy" but rather "You'd Best Buy", you start to get a clearer picture of their mission.

  210. Contracts, corporate shadyness, and the like... by Cinematique · · Score: 2

    Perhaps this is off the topic of Best Buy... but it deals with corporate shenanigans nevertheless.

    Two years ago, when I had AOL, I subscribed under the Bring Your Own Access $10/mo. plan. When I received one of the very last bills from them, my statement reflected a change that I did not want.... I had been moved to the $10/5hrs/month plan. My original plan was unlimited, the new only allowed for 5 hours of usage a month. You can probably see where this is leading.

    The total for the previous month came to a whopping $160, which I knew must be a mistake. Hoping to clear it up with AOL, I called and explained the situation.

    Unfortunately, they didn't think of it as a problem.

    I talked to three regular-level customer support reps, plus a supervisor, all with the same result... being stuck paying $160 for a change that I had not initiated.

    AOL persistently insisted that I had changed the information myself, and their fraud department refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing.

    Frustrated, I called my credit card company and explained the situation... I was not going to let AOL essentially steal $150 from me ($160 - $10 = $150.)

    To my avail, the credit card company promptly shut down my old card/account plus blocked any attempts for AOL to charge against it. They then established a new card/account, and finally prohibited AOL from charging to the new in the case that they obtained my new information!

    Say what you want about me having AOL at the time, but I stress two things: first, it was not my primary ISP. Second, more importantly, they tried to screw me. With the help of my bank, I fought back.

    1. Re:Contracts, corporate shadyness, and the like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing really wrong with AOL.

      That's where Marc Andreesen and all the cool hepcats have their internet access.

      *snicker*

  211. They also sell used products as new!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just bought a Playstation 2 from Best Buy, and when i got it all set up i found that it was not only defective, it was also USED. There was a game stuck inside the unit!! I paid full price for this and was completely outraged. When i went back to return it, the guy says "What game was stuck in it?" Puzzled, i answered, "Tony Hawk 3." He yells to the other employee, "Hey, so-and-so, is this yours or mine?" The two spent the next few minutes arguing over whose game it was, which shows that the employees are sitting around playing on the Playstations then selling them as new!! F*ck Best Buy.

  212. My DDR story with BB by (H)elix1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My DDR Ram story

    Here is my story. I was putting off getting a couple sticks of DDR RAM until after the MPX motherboards were ready to ship. Prices started to skyrocket - thinking they would come down again I waited another week. That next week, Best Buy ran an add for 256 stick of crucial DDR RAM for $25 (after $10 rebate on one) when the market was closer to $50. I went to the store and sure enough, it was stripped clean. On-line, however, it showed in stock so I picked up some for in-store pickup.

    Order Date: Dec 10, 2001
    In-store Pick-up Items:
    Crucial Technologies 256MB PC2 --- 2 $34.99 $69.

    It looked good. No problems. The store was near by, so I stopped in and checked. We should have another shipment any day now.... Then the email...

    Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001
    From: onlinestore@bestbuy.com
    To: xxx
    Subject: BestBuy.com Order Cancellation Notice

    Dear (sucker-my-name-here),

    Thank you for shopping at BestBuy.com.

    One or more of the items that you've recently ordered have cancelled. Please take a moment
    to contact our Customer Care representatives by replying to this e-mail or by calling us
    toll-free at 1-888-BEST BUY (1-888-237-8289) for further assistance.

    I called the customer service people, and they said that if the item was offered again, they would honor the price. Early January, I saw the RAM was listed on the website again. I called the CS department before I ordered and asked for the details. They said if the item was exactly the same skew number, they would honor the price and ship it to me free this time. Call back with the order number. I ordered, called with the info, and got the item....

    Order Date: Jan 10, 2002
    Shipped Items:
    Crucial Technology 256MB PC210 --- 2 $89.99 $179.98 Shipped on Jan 11,
    2002

    As one may guess, getting the credit was less than easy. Turns out after I took shipment they tell me - ah, well the credit is not automatic. OK... They will forward it to another department for review.. Gha! Well, after many phone calls and showing up in person (something about working a few blocks away may help) they relented and gave me the full credit promised. The email was not clear, but eventually the credits came.

    Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002
    From: BestBuy.com Customer Care
    Subject: Shipping Credit Applied

    Greetings from BestBuy.Com,

    This email is regarding the recent order you placed on www.BestBuy.com for
    In-Store Pick-up. Because our store did not have the product(s) you ordered
    in-stock, we are providing you with free shipping to your home.

    Your credit card statement will show that you were charged the price of the
    product(s) plus applicable taxes and shipping costs. The billing statement
    will also show a credit to your account that reflects the cost of shipping
    and handling. There may also be a credit for any applicable tax difference
    and difference in the price of the product(s). Your credit card bank will
    receive notice of this credit within the next 24-48 hours, however, it may
    take up to 2-3 billing cycles for the credit to appear on your billing
    statement. If you have questions regarding this credit please contact your
    credit card bank for more information.

    We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you and we hope that you
    will continue to shop www.BestBuy.com for all of your future entertainment
    needs.

    It gets worse.... One of my friends ordered for normal delivery. They decided not to give her the credit, but were gracious enough to take the unopened package back and refund all the cost involved. The lameness filter here sucks - but the twists and turns it took to do both were insane.

  213. Fuck EB... by YuppieScum · · Score: 2

    When I lived in NYC, I went to both EB and Toys'R'Us to buy a DreamCast when they came out.

    Toys'R'Us would sell me one for the declared retail price of USD199 (IIRC), but EB stated that they could only sell one to me for USD229 - a price which included an EB extended warranty. Even better, they argued that this was mandated by Sega, and that it was not possible to buy a DreamCast without it.

    Needless to say, I bought the DC from TRU... but went back in to the EB on Broadway (to buy a game that TRU didn't have) and loudly gave the manager a hard time about it, on a packed Saturday afternoon.

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
  214. from the FTC website: by hollanan · · Score: 1
    The FTC's interpretation of the FTCAct, Section 5:


    The Federal Trade Commission Act allows the FTC to act in the interest of all consumers to prevent deceptive and unfair acts or practices. In interpreting Section 5 of the Act, the Commission has determined that a representation, omission or practice is deceptive if it is likely to:

    - mislead consumers and
    - affect consumers' behavior or decisions about the product or service.

    In addition, an act or practice is unfair if the injury it causes, or is likely to cause, is:

    - substantial
    - not outweighed by other benefits and not reasonably avoidable.

    The FTC Act prohibits unfair or deceptive advertising in any medium. That is, advertising must tell the truth and not mislead consumers. A claim can be misleading if relevant information is left out or if the claim implies something that's not true.


    Lots of room for manuvering.. especially anytime the word "resonable" is used. Usually posting a rediculously low price would cause people to rush into your store, then you sell them other things, I know CompUSA was doing this with those 50 packs of blank CD-R media for $9.99 last year, at least they let you buy them for that price when they got you into the store.
  215. Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is an "Indian American" and what does it have to do with anything???

  216. Similiar Situation w/ BUY.COM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a few years ago i bought several monitors from buy.com at an obviously erroneous price. buy.bom refused to honor most of the purchases and yada yada yada ... after 3 years and absolutely no work on my part i got a nice check for a little over $30 from some class-action lawsuit against buy.com.
    best buy might be a bunch of chumps but it seems like they were trying to cover their asses without breaking their balls

  217. Christ.. by _aa_ · · Score: 2

    For the last time.. The agreement you agreed to when you registered for their site clearly explains that they reserve the right to cancel any order for any reason they want. Furthermore it explicity stated that prices are subject to change without notification.

    Duh. If it's too good to be true, it's probably not true. Besides.. IT'S A DAMNED VIDEO CARD. If it was life saving surgery, or a flying car, it might be worth getting pissed over. But as long as you got your money back, then it's certainly not worth getting pissed over.

    1. Re:Christ.. by praksys · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but...

      Retailers are required by law to honour the prices that they advertise or display. The fact that Best Buy asked customers to sign an agreement saying otherwise *might* make a difference, but probably will not.

      Retailers cannot, for example, post a "EULA" on their front door saying that "by entering this store you waive any consumer rights granted to you by state or federal law". It seems unlikely that the courts will allow online retailers to what amounts to the same thing by requiing their customers to waive some of their rights before they shop online.

    2. Re:Christ.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

      Retailers can print a retraction and cancel the sale.

      Besides which, the only time retailers get into trouble with the law over falsely advertised prices is when they use them to fraudulently lure people into the store. Clearly this was not a deliberate case of that happening. They won't get into any kind of trouble (with the law) for not honoring the price.

    3. Re:Christ.. by Quila · · Score: 2
      The agreement you agreed to when you registered for their site clearly explains that they reserve the right to cancel any order for any reason they want. Furthermore it explicity stated that prices are subject to change without notification.

      They can throw up all the disclaimers they want, but that means nothing in the face of consumer protection laws. This is like those unenforceable rediculous "give us your first born" EULAs.

    4. Re:Christ.. by praksys · · Score: 1

      You are right about advertisements - they can print a retraction - but this does not apply to prices on goods in the store. If they put a price on something, and you you try to buy it, then they cannot refuse to sell it at that price.

      So a court might have to decide whether a price published on a website is just an advertisement, or effectively an in-store price. I suspect that the courts would come down of the later side. If you can pay for the good online, or place an order, then the prices on the website are more like those in a store than like those in an advertisement.

    5. Re:Christ.. by _aa_ · · Score: 2

      Nobody forces you to agree to their agreement. You have the right to waive your consumer protection rights, and that's what you do when you agree to such agreements. Buyer beware. If you do not agree with their disclaimers, THEN WHY DID YOU AGREE TO THEM?

    6. Re:Christ.. by Quila · · Score: 2

      Nobody forces you to agree to their agreement. You have the right to waive your consumer protection rights, and that's what you do when you agree to such agreements. Buyer beware.

      You don't really have that right. You have rights within law that you cannot waive. Why, for example, is indentured servitude illegal? It's just a contract between an employer and employee. It's illegal because you are not allowed to sign away your right to freedom -- the contract would be completely unenforceable. There's ample Supreme Court precedence for this concept.

    7. Re:Christ.. by _aa_ · · Score: 2

      Butlers, Maids, Waiters, Waitresses, are all indentured servants. Indentured means "having entered into a contract of servitude". It has nothing to do with freedom because they get paid in exchange for their services. And, last time I checked it was not illegal to be a butler. The only rights you cannot waive in the US are the unailienable ones, Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness. You can waive your right to a lawyer, you can waive your right to remain silent, and you can waive your rights to consumer protection by entering into contracts that may or may not be "safe".

      Shopping online is not a right, Best Buy offers it as a service, and in order to participate you have to agree to the terms of their agreement. If you do not agree to the terms, you should not participate. You can still get in your car and goto your local Best Buy and purchase items without signing any contracts. Everybody who bought those stupid video cards entered into the agreement, and now they are changing their minds, saying "No you have to sell it for the price you advertised!!". Unfortunatly for those who purchased the video cards, they have a document that you digitally "signed" in which they state that they reserve the right to change the price without notification, and cancel orders for any reason they wish.

      The buyers should be thankful that Best Buy let them out of the other agreement they signed, the purchase, and didn't simply charge their credit cards the full price, which was their right according to the agreement.

    8. Re:Christ.. by Quila · · Score: 2

      Butlers, Maids, Waiters, Waitresses, are all indentured servants. Indentured means "having entered into a contract of servitude". It has nothing to do with freedom because they get paid in exchange for their services.

      There is one major difference. A butler can quit, an indentured servant can't. If you could waive your rights given by consumer protection laws, then all laws would be useless due to a disclaimer on the front door of every business. That's absurd.

      I'm going to get a T-shirt that says "By pissing me off, you hereby waive all rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" and then shoot everyone who pisses me off. I hope you will contribute to my legal defense fund.

      The basic question is: You know a brick-and-mortar store could never get away with doing something like this. Why should an online store be allowed to?

    9. Re:Christ.. by _aa_ · · Score: 2

      you'd have to get people to sign your T-shirt, then you'd have to get your shirt notarized, then you could shoot them.

      Conversly, by making it impossible for an individual to waive his/her rights, it takes away the ability to do a lot of fun things. If you couldn't waive your right to sue, it would be a LOT harder to go skydiving or bungee jumping. If you had your way, and companies such as Best Buy could not have such agreements, then smaller companies like ThinkGeek would not be able to have online shopping. If a small company makes a mistake and posts a $10,000 plasma TV for $500, and 1,000 people buy it, and the government says, "Yes you have to honor that price" then the company is sunk. Best Buy is a big company and can afford to lose a buck or two, but imagine that this had happened on ThinkGeek.. I doubt anyone would have pursued this beyond canceling their order.

      Frankly I hope you get your wish, and the government says, "Honor the price". Then as you watch your favorite online stores move to canada and you start paying twice as much for shipping, you can think back and say, "Woe is me, I wish I had listened to _aa_ and had protected my right to waive my rights."

    10. Re:Christ.. by Quila · · Score: 2

      you'd have to get people to sign your T-shirt, then you'd have to get your shirt notarized, then you could shoot them.

      Why? If the sign on a store/site is a binding contract, why not my T-shirt? By talking to me they agreed to accept an illegal action, same as your view that by people shopping at a store, they agree to accept illegal actions.

      I'm going to open the most dishonest store around, ripping people off like crazy in violation of consumer protection laws, but just put up the disclaimer "By shopping here you agree to waive your rights under any law or custom" to keep me safe. That appears to be the world of your dreams.

    11. Re:Christ.. by _aa_ · · Score: 2

      The agreement on Best Buy's website is not a sign.. you have to click, "Yes, I agree".

      I don't think very many people would shop at your store.

      Regardless of what any law or agreement says, you and your cohorts are attempting to profit from someone's mistake. That is called greed. You can argue that you're "stealing from the rich, and giving to the poor" but if you can afford to spend even $100 on a video card, then you are not that poor. I happen to beleive that it's ok for businesses to protect themselves from people like you. Again, I reiterate, if this were a small business, this single situation would destroy it.

      I beleive that the "Illegal Act" you are refferring to is called "Bait & Switch", more commonly used by auto dealership to physically lure people into their store and then high pressure sell them on another, more pricey, vehicle. This situation was obviously an honest mistake. I don't think you're going to get John Ashcroft to side with you on this one, either.

      You also bring up one's right to die, as in your t-shirt. It's still questionable, and I beleive there was a case lost recently in france, but I imagine that in the not-so-distant future, you will be able to indemnify a doctor to take your own life. And i suppose there's no law against putting a contract on a t-shirt.

  218. That sucks..... by Darth+Gambit · · Score: 1

    Anyone else upset they didn't catch onto this when it happened? A GeForce 4 card for that much...man I'm bumin' now

  219. PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AGAINST BB by cOdEgUru · · Score: 0

    Our fellow slashdotter has gone in to all this trouble over creating a petition against BB over this incident and others.

    Please show your solidarity by signing the petition.

    http://www.petitiononline.com/BBBC/petition.html

    1. Re:PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AGAINST BB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Petition online petitions are worthless...They have no credibility and nobody reads them.

  220. Geez.... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    I don't know whether to be sick or thoroughly pissed off. The man ought to be suing for more than 90k over that BS. Just like Cherian should be suing the crap out of them over his abuse at their hands.

    I've been following the whole sordid GeForce debacle because a close friend of mine was one of the thousands that they've screwed. The more I see, the more apalled I am at them, and the "Better Business Bureau".

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Geez.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at BBy and had to shop competitors as well. The understanding between the competitors was that you could use a tape recorder but you couldn't use a pad and paper or a notebook PC - it had to be a tape recorder.

      If people came in attempting to use paper or a PC we would explain that they had to use a tape recorder. It was never a problem.

      My understanding was that tape recorders were the least intrusive and got the competitor out of the store quickly.

  221. practicing law without a license by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The comments following the post render legal advice, which may not be correct for all jurisdictions.

    Is the post an attorney? Has the bar in affected jurisdictions been able to examine the poster for his qualifications to give this advice?

    You forgot the obligatory IANAL.

  222. That usually ends up getting used... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    ...when the veracity of the individual comes into question. I know I'd be at least inclined to throw that one out if accused of trying to steal things, i.e. I'm trying to defraud them. At that stage, yes, it's not much good, but there's often times little to salvage at that point.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  223. Flamebait^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H by wadetemp · · Score: 2

    Is anyom^Hne getting tri^H^Hired of this crap^H^H^H^H over use of a stupid^H^H^H^H^H^H once was funny joke? Damn, give it a rest... it's not *THAT* amusing. Seems like half of the posts and repeated^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H stories these days use it.

  224. The employee is always right. by robolemon · · Score: 1
    My roommate bought a TV at a Best Buy up here in the Boston area. When we were attempting to put the box in our friend's car (whose doors were just barely not large enough), the Best Buy employees laughed at us and told us repeatedly to take it out of the box. We relented, wanting at least to try keeping the TV in its protective foam, but instead the Best Buy employees continued mocking us. We would have asked for the manager, but he was there mocking us as well.

    I guess Best Buy policy is not to help customers, but rather to mock them.

    --

    I design user interfaces for a free network management application,

    1. Re:The employee is always right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you store the TV in it's protective foam each night when you're done watching it?

    2. Re:The employee is always right. by robolemon · · Score: 1

      Actually no. I've heard that moving the cathode ray tube within 24 hours or so of being on can be damaging. I always make sure to wait at least a full day before I store it in my packing foam in my locked closet.

      --

      I design user interfaces for a free network management application,

  225. bad upkeep by tlh1005 · · Score: 1

    Last year when the Sopranos second season arrived on DVD I checked it out on Best Buy's website. They ran a special which was basically: purchase season one and season two together for $114..... when I went to see the price of season two alone (I already owned season one), I was astonished to see the price listed as $57. I went to a local store to purchase it at this price but they had it for $79 so I just went home and bought it over the net for $57 and chose the "In store pickup" method of delivery. These guys seem to chronically have trouble with getting things right with there site.

  226. A testament to greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets not make assumptions about how much they spend on their Xmas party, based on numbers you get from yahoo.com.
    It's true that the negative exposure they are receiving may cost a small amount of sales.
    Best Buy caters more to the average consumer, not the average /. reader. And do you really think that every person who has heard of this fiasco will boycott Best Buy? Unlikely. I bet you yourself will be buying from them again. I know that if they have the best price on something I'm in the market for, they will get my business at that time.
    It's possible that BBY will lose some value in the market, as negative media tends to affect the market sharply. However, they are currently valued at close to their high point for this year at $75.49 per share. That is a pretty good testament to consumer confidence.

    It's sad that those people will most likely win their cases, based on so-called fraud. It's plainly obvious they are only trying to take advantage of a mistake. $129 per is probably less than what Best Buy paid for the cards.

    Whatever the case, the bottom line is that people are greedy poop factories and it will be a rather lovely day when as a species we remove ourselves from existence.

  227. No way! Not THERE! by Skapare · · Score: 2

    NO!!!!!!!!

    Don't send him THERE! I don't want to keep getting screwed over by not getting enough pickles or just a yellow dot for mustard, while he's trying to convince me to buy the fries. Why ruin a half-way decent fast food joint with that shithead.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  228. greedy poop factories, all of you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, indeed. You put enormous amounts of energy in, and all you do is produce copious amounts of poop, carbon dioxide, and various other gases of dubious value.

    And then you whine, and whine, and whine.

    Here's an idea: Why don't you become self-sufficient? Yes that would be lovely, perhaps you could run a tube from your anus (poop dispenser) to your mouth.

  229. Best Buy == the devil by jub · · Score: 1

    I haven't shopped at Worst Buy for about 8 years, since i was falsely accused of stealing from the store.

    I'd been shopping for a walkman, spent 20 minutes in the store trying to decipher the display with no luck. There were models out that weren't in stock, no prices, and piles of boxed models with no info at all, and not a salesperson in sight. I walked out the door, only to have some guy follow me across the street and ask me for my ID. He said i looked like a guy who had stolen something in the past month.

    The visit before that was about a year before, when it had taken 45 minutes to get them to honor an "instant rebate" that included free CDs (i was buying a CD deck). The sale price wasn't automatically rung up at the register (as the signs had indicated), and i had to go through 2 more checkouts to get full credit back.

    Needless to say, i don't shop there any more.

    If that isn't bad enough, here in the Twin Cities, they are building a new headquarters building. They lobbied the 'lucky' suburb to evict and tear down a decades-old car dealership in the process. bleah.

    They're evil! I'll stick to online shopping - they might also be idiots, but at least i don't have to talk to them.

    1. Re:Best Buy == the devil by alecto · · Score: 2
      I walked out the door, only to have some guy follow me across the street and ask me for my ID.

      Why did you not tell this guy to go screw? Or was it an off-duty cop in uniform or something?

  230. A few words from BB lawyers by Guido69 · · Score: 1

    Here's a snip from BB.com's new TOS (entitled "A Few Words from Our Attorneys")

    "Errors on Our Site
    Prices and availability are subject to change without notice. Errors will be corrected where discovered, and Best Buy reserves the right to revoke any stated offer and to correct any errors, inaccuracies or omissions including after an order has been submitted and whether or not the order has been confirmed and your credit card charged. If your credit card has already been charged for the purchase and your order is cancelled, BestBuy.com will issue a credit to your credit card account in the amount of the charge. Individual bank policies will dictate when this amount is credited to your account. ..."

    The full TOS can be found here (http://www.bestbuy.com/InfoCenter/Policies/TOSLeg al.asp#legal)

    --
    - If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat? - Steven Wright
  231. I'm going to the Tucker Best Buy... by copponex · · Score: 1

    Tomorrow! Maybe they'll arrest me for being too polite as well and I can sue the unholy shit out of them. I'd take the money, open up a non-profit shop next door to them, and slowly grind them into submission.

  232. No Oni CD... by Alari · · Score: 1

    My own "Best Buy" story is pretty pathetic comparatively... =) They advertised an "Oni" soundtrack CD to be included with the game. After the third visit to the store over a month-long period, and getting yet another smiling salesperson telling me that "Oh yeah, they'll be in next week", I finally realized that I wasn't getting my CD. (I left my number several times, never got 1 call from them)

    I get the impression that Best Buy does this kind of deception regularly, and has no qualms about it. Of course, a promotional soundtrack isn't all that big of a deal, I doubt I'd have thought about it again if I hadn't read this.

    --
    I use Windows... like a two dollar wh.. why don't I just go ahead and not finish that sentence.
  233. Settling out of court ... by Skapare · · Score: 2

    Settling out of court can be OK ... IF you refuse to sign any agreement containing a non-disclosure clause ... and if the amount is sufficient to sting. Remember, they are trying to save their reputation and legal expenses. You should get a portion of that. A BIG portion. This case could easily cost THEM $500,000 if it goes all the way to court.

    And definitely do not agree to any change of jurisdiction. Keep it right there in Georgia.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  234. Think about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, there's a point. This fellow was not injured in any way. I fact, he's drawing more attention to himself with all the press (which I personally would find even more humiliating). The cops pretty much admit he was wronged by a representative of Best Buy so why doesn't he press charges against the individual? I'll tell you why; because he wouldn't get a dime.

    Lawsuits should be reserved for real offences against ones self. It *should not* be like the lottery. Otherwise one day when every one gets sick of frivolous lawsuits it'll be diluted to the point that you'll be a cripple, the lawyer will paint you as a grredy SOB, and you'll lose. Think it can't happen? The motions in congress regarding caps on settlements and "frivolous lawsuits" are a result of this lottery-like mentality.

    If it was myself I'd be telling my friends over beers about how I got arrested and not telling the press I was devastated because my wrists were chaffed from handcuffs and I was humiliated. I guarentee you that when I stubbed my toe last week it hurt worse. As for being humiliated, sorry buddy but there's more humiliating shit that can happen to you in this reality and you're not exempt from them happening to you. There are serious wrongs commited every day and I feel this guy's story is just bullshit.

  235. "fraud" = fradulent use of financial instrument by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    There are different types of fraud. I was specifically refering to "fradulent use of financial instrument," e.g., using stolen checks. Depending on your state you may hit a felony at $100-500, with a 5- or even 10-year prison sentence. If it's a "three-strikes" state that doesn't specify violent felonies, you may be talking about a life sentence without parole.

    The store manager filing a false police report isn't usually considered "fraud" since the purpose is clearly to harass another person, not to get unwarranted financial compensation.

    (But IANAL - we're talking about fine enough details here that you should consult a local attorney, etc.)

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  236. Re:totally free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Goatse wins....again.

  237. Nahh... Might catch something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't know where EB's been...

  238. Agents by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    Nope, what you're talking about is basic "agency" and the original party *is* usually responsible for the misstatements of its agents. (It also has an obligation to monitor the agent's work, has the authority to terminate the agent if it's not doing an acceptable job, etc.) If the original party doesn't like it, it can't back out of contracts due to the action of its agent, it has to seek compensation from its agents.

    As a concrete example, imagine that you are selling your house. You know that it is an old house that has some lead-based paint, and you tell your real estate agent that. But the agent lies to the buyers, and they're legitimately pissed to have a huge bill to make the house safe for their very young children. They sue you, and they'll win. You have to sue your real estate agent (or his employer) for damages caused by their misrepresentation.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  239. Huge New Headquarters..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have to get the full price to pay for their giagantic new headquarters that they are building in Richfield, Minnesota (suburb of Minneapolis/St. Paul) Anybody from Minnesota thats seen it will know what I am talking about.

    1. Re:Huge New Headquarters..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it is a monster. The used the city's power of emminent domain to condem the houses and businesses there despite the fact that the majority of property owners did not want to leave.

      I have had my share of problems with the company and really hate them. They are a very poor example of a business and their ethics well, lets just say that they won't win any awards.

  240. CompUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think CompUSA has the worst pricing structure of any of them. They will advertise a price thats "onsale" for more than it was the week before, then next week offer a "rebate" on it, and the next week have it the original price. It seems to cycle.

  241. Um, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The only thing you can do in the case of 'False Advertising' is get a Cease & Desist order to stop the advertising, but you don't get to sue their pants off.

    Um, Intentionally false or misleading advertising are violations at law, and subject to fine and various other process. And, a finable offense can be complained by an individual. "Typos" and "errors" are one thing, intentional deception is another. "Sue their pants off"? Well, no, you can sue for damages and that is, usually, not worth the legal costs. And almost never worth the political risk that DA might face for getting involved. But big cases have come about, and businesses have been put a risk for the practice.

    "Bait and switch" (advertising a good price, but only for one item) can be fined, first offense. Mostly because it is easy to prove.

    All ads must be made in "good faith".

    The trouble here is proving "bad faith". An employee mistake, or publisher's typo, does not bad faith make. But, if you can demonstrate it, every case of false advertisement is a fraud.

    The advertisment differs from an "offer" in that it is limited in liablity. If you ad apples at $.10 each you must have a "reasonable" amount on hand at that price to meet expected demand (or stipulate limited supply). If demand exceeds your "reasonable" expectation, you can turn away further takers (Thus it couldn't have been an offer). You can not, however, adjust your price to $.50 when you notice a long line of pie bakers forming outside your door, or tell a lone taker that you have no apples at that price.

    Of course, you could post a nice note saying the price is $.50 and the ad was a typo. You can be sued, dragged through discovery, etc. etc. and might be found out. You might also make a whole bunch of really ticked off customers.

    Best Buy should have honered all orders for which they processed a credit card. Being /.'ed onto my "do no visit" list wasn't worth the loss.

    Anyway, an Internet sales site is a tricky thing. There is what might be considered an "ad" portion, and a "sale" portion. In my opinion, that "sale" portion raises the bar of responsiblity beyond that of a simple "ad" to that of a "store". Nothing different than if their cash register was mis-programmed to reflect that $129 price, there was offer-and-acceptance.

  242. Complimentary You Dumbass Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, the title says it all.

  243. The Tucker store stinks - But compusmart is better by dr_db · · Score: 1

    I bought a pair of 64MB DIMMs there once, got home and there was a mismatched pair of 4MB Dimms in the bag.

    They exchanged it without question - I was most certainly worried that they were going to accuse me of swapping the ram myself though.

  244. Another example of the Big Business Sob Story... by toiletsalmon · · Score: 0

    "It doesn't make sense that people should be able to lose their jobs and that kind of money over a misprint of a price, even if it wasn't caught immediately."

    Why the fuck not?

    If somebody breaks into my house, slips, falls, and busts their head open on my kitchen floor, I can loose "that kind of money" through a lawsuit and THAT would be through no screw up on my part AT ALL. I don't even need to be at home at the time!

    If anyone can afford to loose "that kind of money" Best Buy sure as hell can. Besides, I'm sure their insured for that kind of stuff anyway.

    It's that same mentality that allows these big corporations to suck off of the government "welfare tit" while the "regular working guy" has to work an extra 4 hours every week to pay for 24 our medical surveilance for the president to make sure he doesn't choke on a fucking pretzel.

  245. Re:This illustrates a *big* problem with the web.. by izx · · Score: 1

    I ALWAYS take PDFs of any web-receipts/TOS/policies etc (Acrobat 5). This way, I save on binders and papers, and have the proofs reasonably safe (even back-up to CDRs once in a while). Everyone may not have Acrobat, but I suggest you do atleast an HTML save for electronic soft copy.

  246. 1.54 out of 10! by snoslayer · · Score: 1

    Apparently not many other people like Best Buy either: they are rated at 1.54 out of 10. Check out more comments at www.resellerratings.com snoslayer

  247. Not the first time.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Best Buy in Reston, VA had a shopper who was doing price comparisons arrested - twice.

    They came to an "out-of-court settlement". I can just imagine the corporate lawyers at Best Buy thinking "You fucking morons."

  248. Re:Another example of the Big Business Sob Story.. by flatrock · · Score: 2

    Back to the situational morality. I guess it's apparently ok in your mind if a big company gets screwed. What if this was a small family owned business that sells on the web? A mistake like this could easily wipe out their business, throwing them into bankruptcy and wiping out their life savings. Would if bo ok in that situation too?

    Even when Best Buy gets screwed, the losses are passed on to other people. Retail stores aren't doing that well in the current economy. To absorb this loss along with the weak sales they may raise prices on other items some, but that doesn't work well in a bad economy. That means they're likely to lay people off, or just not hire people to fill positions as people leave. This means normal, average people don't have jobs. Maybe they don't have to lay people off. Maybe things are better than I think and they can just reduce their dividends to their shareholders. Of course those shareholders include a lot of retirement plans, so it's taking money from people's parents and gradnparents who are relying on the money to get them through their later years. The situational morality crap only justifies itself if you don't think about it too hard.

  249. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by markmoss · · Score: 2

    IIRC, the federal law is that they can charge if the order will be shipped within 30 days. I don't quite see the logic behind that -- since 99% of mail & internet order businesses don't control the manufacturing of their products, the only way they can be _sure_ they'll be able to ship in 30 days is if the product is already in their hands -- so they'll be shipping immediately. If you don't charge until the shipment is in the box, then you don't get into screw-ups like this, or the much more common screw-up of charging the card, then finding out that you're out of stock.

    Well, we all know why the law is tilted towards businesses over consumers. Consumers just vote, businesses pay b^r^i^b^e^s^campaign contributions. What I don't understand is why so many businesses adopt policies sure to result in p-o-ed customers? Now and then you can inflate the profits for a quarter by screwing your customers, go through a merger based on the inflated stock price, and then try to repeat the process under a new name, but how many times can this work?

  250. Re:Another example of the Big Business Sob Story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot it was our job to subsidize bad business.

  251. Petition for Cherian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, if you think that what happened to Cherian was wrong, and Best Buy should have to own up to their mistakes, take the time to go by

    http://www.petitiononline.com/BBBC/petition.html

    and sign the petition created on Cherian's behalf. Please let Best Buy know that we won't stand for letting them arrest innocent consumers.

    Sincerely,

    Eric Johnson

  252. Another incident... by jbarr · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of my experience about 2 years ago with Best Buy's web site. I saw a DVD advertized for $.02. Yes, that's two cents! I didn't even like the title, but figured, "what the heck, for two cents, let's get it!" I ordered the DVD, and a day or so later I received an email stating that my order had been cancelled due to a pricing error along with some appologies. I emailed customer service and said that it was wrong that they had canceled my order because they had advertized the price, and I was purchasing the product under the understanding that the pricing on the web site is correct. I asked how they would remedy the situation so as not to lose a customer.

    They responded by giving me a $20.00 gift certificate code to be used on future orders. Needless to say, I was most pleased.

    Of course, the issue at hand is of greater scope, but my point is that it can't hurt to stand up for yourself when a company screws you.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  253. Open suggestion to CEOs of Circuit City et. al. by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Were I the CEO of (Circuit City|Frys|Wal-Mart), I'd be pulling in my marketing director and purchasing director, and saying:

    Purchasing - order in 2000 of these cards. I don't care how much they cost - get them.

    Marketing - Media blitz. The slogan is "When they screw up, they arrest you. When we screw up, we make it right." Offer one of these video cards for $129.99 to anyone who can prove they ordered one from Best Buy, the order was accepted, and then canceled.

    Get over to the guy who was arrested - give him a card. Ask him if he would be willing to appear in our ads.

    They screwed up - let's make it REALLY hurt.

    BY LUNCHTIME, PEOPLE. MOVE!



    Should anyone working for one of these companies read this, please forward to the appropriate parties.
  254. Re:Another example of the Big Business Sob Story.. by flatrock · · Score: 2

    I'm not suggesting you subsidize anyone. If you don't like Best Buy, don't buy from them.

  255. I have a long list of companies I hate by AssFace · · Score: 2

    and bestbuy is one of them.
    one of my friends went through a two month ordeal with them over a large sony wega and finally got it all resolved and has vowed to never shop there again. I refuse to even go to the website and/or step foot in their store. although I do currently use netflix even though they sell their videos via a link to bestbuy, but I never buy them, just rent them.
    other bad companies on my list:

    Sprint (PCS wireless - the worst cell phone service I've ever experienced, and truly the worst customer service ever)

    AT&T (any division - they lie about bills - are getting sued over that know - they pad bills, then remove it later, they them randomly charge you for things - and then if you confront them on any of this, they deny it all and if you refuse to pay it, they send you to a collection agency - I had to "settle" it with them where instead of the $200 they wanted from me - even though I had three customer service people tell me that I was all paid up in the computer - they would just take $30 and call it even - I paid the $30 and now refuse to use anything they are invovled in... although mediaone getting bought out by them threw a wrench into that here in Cambridge/Somerville.)

    buy.com (you would think I or they would have taken away some lesson from my 15 failed orders with them earlier on in the process - their customer service is incredibly stupid as well)

    MBNA (credit card company - they repeatedly charge me for a service that I never signed up for and repeatedly specifically asked to be removed from - their shopper's advantage program at a $60 a year fee)

    mindspring/earthlink/whatever-the-hell-they-are- no w - I had dsl through them that was so broken and so down that I smashed the modem to bits and called them up to tell them to stop billing me. I refuse to consider dsl from them ever again and am hesitant to ever use dsl again - it worked great for a few months, then broke heavily, and they refused to do anything about it (and had a min of 3 hour wait times for customer service - then when you spoke with them, they were too stupid to know what to do, so they would claim an issue on my end... right)

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  256. Re:Another example of the Big Business Sob Story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you nuts? You present a cookie-cutter pseudo free-market analysis of the effects opf this company's screw-up, and nowhere do you mention the essential (good) corrective that may result from this situation: the company's management could well have to accept responsibility for the screw-up, and then they'll have to get their act together or be replaced by competent people.

    You sound like a typical Microsoft apologist, always claiming that doing things in compliance with ethical and legal standards will ultimately hurt the consumer! What a crock.

  257. Credit card protection by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    To go along with this, while I don't use a credit card for these purchases, I do use my Visa Check Card from my bank. It's a check card with Visa protection. Find a bank that offers such a card because it will afford you all the protections that come along with the Visa symbol and it will work like a credit card.

  258. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by tps12 · · Score: 2

    I think the idea is that almost always, the company can count on being able to ship within 30 days. The few times when they're wrong, they pay a nominal fee ($2 or something) to refund the customer's credit card. So businesses that regularly precharge are ones to whom the immediate availability of capital is more beneficial than a few extra dollars would be. It's not surprising that this practice is more common in smaller Internet stores that are looking for growth than in larger, established businesses.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  259. Re:Disclaimer? -- yeah, but.... by tps12 · · Score: 2
    A lot of times stores (esp. department stores) don't keep their registers updated with the floor prices. So if you aren't careful, you may not notice that the sweater you grabbed because it was 50% off is actually being rung up as if it were 30% off.

    Of course, if you notice it, they are happy to give you the right price. The Tower situation is absurd and unprofessional, but, as you say, what can you do.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  260. Retailers do not exempt themselves by bluGill · · Score: 2

    I suppose you are right that retailers are not required to honor a price that was misprinted. Legally anyway.

    However practilly, most retailers will honor the listed price if possibal. I know several people who got a $60 phone for $30 when a $40 phone was on sale, but they put the wrong picture in the ad. Just the picture of the more epensive phone (the text listed the model # and features of the cheaper phone) was enough that they would take the loss on the more expensive phone.

    1. Re:Retailers do not exempt themselves by sheldon · · Score: 2

      Yes, generally retailers will honor misprints for the first several people. But then they'll also publish a retraction, or post a notice on the door of the store. The difference here is that one person noticed this and then posted it on numerous websites "Hey Best Buy mismarked these video cards... Quick, go order one before they fix it."

      So it's not as though people were upset because the product was been misprinted, they knew they were taking advantage of the store all along.

      I've gotten many a bargain because of store mistakes. I once bought Visual C++ 4.0 Professional edition for $50 because it had been priced wrong. I didn't expect to get it at that price, I just pointed it out to the cashier and the manager reluctantly gave it to me. He also then went and pulled all other copies off the shelf to insure they were priced correctly.

  261. You guys are amazing by amarkham · · Score: 1


    I'm willing to bet that if any of *YOU* accidentally put the wrong price on an item that you put in your local classified ads, you would inform the people that called you that the price was incorrect and tell them the correct price.

    Furthermore, if you called about an ad in the classifieds and the person told you that it was a typo, you'd just say "Damn, I was hoping I had found a great deal."

    However, when a business is involved, everyone sharpens their claws and tries to figure out how they can use the law to help them rip off the retail store. If you don't like Best Buy, don't shop there, but don't pretend this is any more than a thinly veiled attempt to try and "get yours". So damned obvious it's stupid.

  262. Call them and complain! by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    Let them know how you feel! Make their phones ring non-stop! Be calm and collected and professional!

    Northlake Ga (Store #513)
    4145 Lavista Rd northlake Square
    Tucker, GA 30084
    Phone: 770-939-7660
    Hours: Mon-Sat 10:00am-9:00pm
    Sun 11:00am-6:00pm

  263. All I can say is WWW.BESTBUYSUX.ORG by lakorai · · Score: 1
    I worked for Best Buy for 4 months from August 2001 to December 2001. I have never worked for such an incompetent, lazy, greedy and customer dis-service oriented company as Best Buy. The wage was a joke and thier service was horrible. They bitch about numbers and pull the "bait and switch" tactic all the time. Screw Best Buy - especially #403 Westland MI where I worked at.

    Don't support such a lazy, disservice oriented company. Prod's at BBUy don't care about you or your dollar because they don't get commission - but their managers and supervisors do....

    read www.bestbuysux.org for reasonss why this company sucks @$$. -LAKORAI

  264. Re:Smartass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so entertaining to read posts on /. - where

    The proper typographical representation of an em dash is "--" and not "-".

    the supposedly "intellectual elite" who are smart enough to use *nix OS's

    The "'s" suffix is a posessive, not a pluralisation. The above would properly be spelled as OSes, assuming the nominalisation of the abbreviation "O.S.".

    , and they can't even spell a simple word like "receipt"...even

    Ellipses (...) should be followed by at least one single space.

    more so when they use cute constructs lile "IANAL".

    "lile"?

    He even spelled "contractual" correctly, but totally whiffled on "receit"

    Maybe he was trying to say "conceit" because he knew you'd be replying to his post.

    may-b they're just 2 31337 to spel rite. ScottKin - doing as James Tiberius Kirk said: "...I'm LAUGHING at the 'Superior Intellect'..."

    Maybe you should suspend your laughter -- you're not smart enough to warrant being that sardonic. In the meanwhile, keep your self-aggrandising verbal diarrhoea to yourself.

  265. YES IT IS: IWJMED - I WATCH JUDGE MATHIS EVERY DAY by JohnDenver · · Score: 2

    False arrest is ALSO when someone calls the cops and intentional makes false accusations to mislead the cops to arresting you.

    He should take them to Judge Mathis. I know there's only a $5000 limit, but Judge Mathis is one sneeky Mofo who knows how to get the truth out of people.

    Don't let his Ghetto Justice fool you, Judge Mathis is a brilliant man.

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
  266. Re:This illustrates a *big* problem with the web.. by alecto · · Score: 2

    And those Windows users that don't have full Acrobat can do this for free by creating a PostScript printer on FILE:. That's what I do when I want a copy of a web receipt but don't want to defeat the purpose of shopping electronically by generating ten sheets of paper in the process.