Slashdot Mirror


Buying a Small, Light Linux Notebook Computer?

metamatic asks: "I'm planning to buy a notebook computer in the near future. Currently I'm looking at an iBook; however, they're a bit larger and heavier than I'd like. PC users are always telling me that PCs are faster and cheaper, and I'd be happy enough running Linux for what I want the notebook for. So: I'm looking for PC notebook computers that outperform the iBook. Must have USB and Firewire, built-in ethernet, and 802.11b support somehow (via a PC card slot is OK). Small is important, lightweight is important, long battery life is important. I don't care about screen size so long as it can do 800x600. Performance isn't a major concern, as I'm not going to be playing 3D games on it. Sounds easy? Here's the catch: I will not purchase Windows!" After all that this industry has gone through in recent years? Does one still have to pay the Microsoft tax when purchasing a laptop?

"I have no Windows software and will not be running any, not even via WINE. I have no desire to go through the hassle of purchasing software I'm not going to use and then fighting to get a token rebate that doesn't actually equate to the cost of a Windows license. Nor am I interested in buying a machine that was purchased with a Windows license, and simply having Windows erased with no refund given.

So far I've found iDot Computers, who will sell laptops with no OS installed. Unfortunately, their lightest, smallest offering is a hefty 2.8kg brick, 3cm bigger than the iBook in width and depth. What I really want is something comparable to a Toshiba Libretto or Sony VAIO R505--except that neither of those companies want to sell me a machine without Windows.

I'm sure plenty of Slashdot readers have faced the same problem--what's the solution?"

1,025 comments

  1. performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Always this emphasis on performance...

    a Jedi craves not these things, only affordability.

    1. Re:performance by The+Jonas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And by the way, Jedis crave acceptance :)

    2. Re:performance by JPriest · · Score: 1

      I think I'm going to put Jedi on my next set of dog tags.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:performance by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      why?

      no one will be impressed, even fewer will care

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Always this emphasis on performance...a Jedi craves not these things, only affordability."

      You sir are an odd Jedi...for we true Jedi crave nothing save the performance to defeat the the darkness of RC5-72! (see http://www.distributed.net/)

    5. Re:performance by Elentar · · Score: 1

      A Jedi would use a Mac... ...Because they wouldn't dare be on the wrong side in the Clone Wars.

      That aside, there's a simple reason (IMHO) why you'll never find many laptops sold without an OS:

      Most computer hardware is not functional without software to interface with it. The laptop's warranty would be pointless if the hardware wasn't useable, so the vendor and the equipment manufacturers must all agree on a solution so that the device is useable when it is received.

      "So what?" you say, "I don't want them to stop shipping Windows - just to ship mine without it. I've already got an OS that will work!" Well, how do you know it will work? What if there's hardware you can't use, but is guaranteed by the vendor to be functional?

      Perhaps you're thinking, "Fine, I'll take mine without a warranty, and I'll write support myself or get a friend to do it if my OS doesn't have it yet." I don't think that getting rid of warranties is a good idea, do you? What do you suppose you would do if your hardware was bad? And perhaps you've never looked around at all the unsuccessful attempts to provide support in your OS for already existing hardware - very few hardware manufacturers make the information available that is needed to FULLY support their products. Most are only partially supported.

      There are a few things working in favor of OS-independence. Standards help to create a level playing field, and the ingenuity of programmers working with each OS helps to bring attention (and thus consumers and manufacturers) if their work is good.

      At least many manufacturers offer some level of support for other OSes. So, when you buy that laptop with the hardware that you really like, just remember that the software to use that hardware is a required part of it - and hardware makers have chosen Windows as the default.

      Stop griping at the vendors, and go complain to the people making the keyboards, mobile processors, usb controllers, firewire ports, and sound chips. Ask them to develop their drivers and applications for a different OS first. Tell them you'll help pay for development, and that you'll give them a nifty 'designed for [your OS here]' logo if they do what you want.

      Yeah, that's what I thought.

      -Elentar

      --
      The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
  2. money back by mschoolbus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know there is a Windows refund site somewhere, as long as you never click okay to a EULA you can get some money back...

    1. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://zork.net/refund/
      Google 'windows refund'--it's a work in progress with little result so far.

    2. Re:money back by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just remember that you have to write the notebook computer manufacturer, *NOT* Microsoft. Microsoft says that because you are buying an OEM copy of it, you have to talk to the OEM. With some OEM's, you have to be persistent.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    3. Re:money back by AntiNorm · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know there is a Windows refund site somewhere, as long as you never click okay to a EULA you can get some money back...

      Maybe this has changed, but when you buy a new, prebuilt PC, do you have to click an EULA anyway? Your "acceptance" of the EULA comes not as a product of clicking a button marked 'I Agree', but as a mere result of your using the OEM product. Thus, most refund sites stress that in order to get a refund, you must not boot into the preinstalled copy of Windows, not even a single time. They will tell you in no uncertain terms not to turn the PC on until you have boot disks for Linux/*BSD/whatever inserted into it.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    4. Re:money back by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Informative
      Unfortunatly the EULA is for the OEM and not the consumer. Unless the consumer decides to re-install it.

      Technically the oem pays for Windows. This is why its hard to return it. Yes, I relize that most OEM's just pass the cost to the consumer but its not that much since OEM's buy in bulk.

      Dell, HP, and Toshiba also get massive bulk discounts in laptop parts which makes up for the price. Dell's are cheap because of this. Go to their website and look at entry level pc's for just $700. Its cheaper to buy a Windows based laptop from Dell and reformat the drive and install Linux then to buy from some small no name company that specialised in Linux but does not get bulk pricing.

      Just pay the extra $25 dollars. IBM only pays $15 per copy of Windows for each pc from what I read back in the anti trust trial when ms strong armed it to kill os/2. The price has gone up for Windows alot but its no big deal and its nothing compared to the amount Windows cost in a store. I am sure the money saved from buying from a big outlet is probably hundreds of dollars so more money is being saved.

      Or if you hate ms and refuse to support them go buy a powerbook from apple.

      They are pricy but have been known for over a decade to be supperior quality. Apple invented alot of the cool stuff in laptops today. The finger pads on laptops for mouse movements is an example of apple's inventions. You can run Linux on a mac as well as have a big selection of software to choose from with MacOSX. Adobe photoshop, IE, MS-Office, games, etc. Another benefit of the mac is that the linux distro's will work better and be less buggy then intel ones because of the limited hardware. They don't need to support 3,000 peripherals from god knows where. They are less buggy and standard configurations are heavily tested by the mac-linux community. This is one of the arguements still used for Unix over Linux. It is heavily integrated with the hardware.

    5. Re:money back by Afrosheen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Doesn't make any difference anyway. Who's to say that you didn't boot it up one time to make sure it works, then install Linux/bsd/whatever. The bottom line is, it makes no difference whether you boot into windows at all, because there's no way of knowing if you did or not from the OEM's perspective. The only one who knows that for sure is YOU.

    6. Re:money back by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      IE and MS-Office? Do you really think this guy wants that?

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
    7. Re:money back by catbutt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just pay the extra $25 dollars.

      Is there something wrong with someone standing up for principles? I think you should be able to buy hardware without buying software (and iBooks don't accomplish this) , regardless of how little it turns out to be when you work out the math. I'm told that MS makes most of their windows-license money from new PC's, so it certainly is not an insignificant amount ($25 is much less than I have heard from other sources)

    8. Re:money back by isorox · · Score: 4, Funny

      today. The finger pads on laptops for mouse movements is an example of apple's inventions.

      Personally I prefer nipples

    9. Re:money back by FueledByRamen · · Score: 3, Funny

      ARRGGGHHH!!! How can you stand massaging the pointer-clit in the center of the keyboard to try and USE a computer!? So many hours I wasted, struggling with that eraser. It is the object of all of my hate and bitterness towards this world. Whoever developed that pointing device shall be doomed to eternal suffering in front of a Toshiba Satellite 486/25 with Windows 3.1, my first encounter with the damned nipple-mouse.

      </rant>
      I prefer the touch pads, personally, and Apple does make the best! Far superior to any I've used on a PC laptop (even some really nice ones [defined as whatever Orifice Depot has out for me to screw with when I'm in there, and that I cannot afford]).

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    10. Re:money back by jshare · · Score: 3, Funny
      How can you stand massaging the pointer-clit...

      I feel sorry for your girlfriend.

      For some of us, it's no effort at all...

      :-P


    11. Re:money back by Trongy · · Score: 1

      The finger pads on laptops for mouse movements is an example of apple's inventions. What a load of bollocks. Touch pads were around for ages before apple started using them. They are even in intel based laptops.

    12. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is the problem. You say just pay the extra $25, but paying that extra allows Microsoft to keep thier control. You can't buy a computer (aside from a Mac) without Windows because everyone is so willing to just pay the $25. It's my $25 and I don't want to have to spend it on something I don't want, and not everyone wants a Mac.

    13. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Windows Refund site is http://windowsrefund.net/

    14. Re:money back by FueledByRamen · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have forgotten your place. In Slashdot-land, there are no girlfriends, only clit-mice. (mouses? meese?)

      I'd bet that you wouldn't stand using the eraser-mouse either when it started to burn the skin from your fingertips after a heated gaming session (well, for the only computer I bought with one, more like a heated Solitare session, but that's still a game). Touchpads won't do that to you.

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    15. Re:money back by groomed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't remember who said it. It goes something like this:

      "There is something impertinent about allowing oneself to be killed over one's principles"

      This is like that.

    16. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right, the $25 is keeping MS in control. Without your $25, they would soon whither and die. The $25 is not what causes Microsoft to be the boss. It's the result.

    17. Re:money back by ebyrob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just pay the extra $25 dollars.

      That sounds like the kind of thing that started a certain tea party in Boston...

    18. Re:money back by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Well...

      Suppose you unpack it in the store where you bought it (as long as you didn't buy it online), and do the "never boot into Windows" thing, and proceed to install your choice of open source OS.

      In theory, as long as one the store staff agrees to become a "witness", it should be OK.

      Disclaimer: I've never tried this.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    19. Re:money back by t0ny · · Score: 0, Troll

      1. the OEM is probably paying a bulk charge based on estimated number of machines sold: ie. they are paying MS so much for approximately 5000 machines, rather than 5031 machines. Its just easier to approximate than keep track. So, in effect, your single copy of Windows doesnt cost Dell more or less either way. What DOES cost Dell is paying some Support person to sit on the phone with some whacko who has a hair up his butt about MS. 2. Since you are getting a faster computer with Windows for less money than a slower computer without, how do you figure you are paying a Microsoft tax? If anything, you are choosing to pay an Apple/Linux tax. 3. If you arent going to use the Windows license, just sell it on eBay. Or send it to me: just make sure you get XP Pro.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    20. Re:money back by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      Another benefit of the mac is that the linux distro's will work better and be less buggy then intel ones because of the limited hardware. They don't need to support 3,000 peripherals from god knows where.

      Sorry, but that's not true in my experience. I've found PPC distros to be remarkably inferior to the PC equivalents, or at least for the fairly easy to use ones. Some of the big names don't release PPC versions at all. Common sense would tell you that Mac hardware would be easier to support, but apparently that isn't the case, and a minority market within a minority market means they get little testing and feedback compared with the PC equivalents. Anyway, that's my experience when a friend wanted Linux on his Mac, we went through about 5 distros, all of them sucked hard compared to the same on a PC.

      Or if you hate ms and refuse to support them go buy a powerbook from apple. They are pricy but have been known for over a decade to be supperior quality.

      He already said he didn't want to pay extra for an iBook, why would he want to pay even more for a PowerBook? He also noted performance was a concern, something that writes off Apple entirely.

      You can run Linux on a mac as well as have a big selection of software to choose from with MacOSX. Adobe photoshop, IE, MS-Office, games, etc.

      Except he already said all his software was available on Linux. Also, this definition of the word "big" must be different to the one I use, other than Photoshop, you can run the real IE and MSOffice on Linux via Wine. Quite why anybody would care about Mac/IE is beyond me, it doesn't have the rendering quirks that mean you have to have IE for Windows present in web design, and if he's happy with Linux why would he pay however many hundred dollars it is for Mac/Office? Games selection is weak on the Mac, if he really cared about that (which he doesn't), he could use WineX on Linux or use the growing collection of native games.

    21. Re:money back by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      What DOES cost Dell is paying some Support person to sit on the phone with some whacko who has a hair up his butt about MS.

      Ok, so it would be cost effective for them to give in as quickly as possible to said wacko, so he will waste as little of their precious time as possible. So, does anybody have an explanation why they resist so much if somebody asks for a refund? (although, to be fair to Dell: if you're persistent, you usually can get your refund..., but why do you have to be so persisten to get it?)

    22. Re:money back by Metrol · · Score: 1

      This is like that.

      Not being forced to purchase a product you didn't want in the first place is like being killed? Is that you Steve? Bill maybe?

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    23. Re:money back by Metrol · · Score: 1

      It is the object of all of my hate and bitterness towards this world.

      You really should get out a bit more. Live a little. There's a great big beautiful world out there just waiting for you to embrace it, and discover that there's so much more to hate and be bitter about. Don't let your hatred be so limited.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    24. Re:money back by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      If you arent going to use the Windows license, just sell it on eBay.

      I'm afraid you can't do that and stay within the law, IIRC. OEM license is tied to one particular computer (motherboard/case?) so he can either use it or not use it.

      Tim

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    25. Re:money back by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      I must confess - diehard Applemonger that I am - that I MUCH prefer the Toshiba nipple to Apple's bloody trackpads. But I prefer a stylus and a touch screen to either...

      Apple, are you hearing me?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    26. Re:money back by echucker · · Score: 1

      Not at all. But unless the seller knows WHY you're not buying, your stand is pointless.

    27. Re:money back by rknop · · Score: 1

      I prefer the touch pads, personally,

      Each to his own. I hate touch pads with a passion, and will never buy a laptop that will saddle me with one. I find eraserheads infinitely more usable.

      -Rob

    28. Re:money back by tetra103 · · Score: 1

      I can argure both sides of this delemma, but common sense tells me to drop it and just buy a machine with MS, then reformat to your liking. I know the thought of supporting MS is painful, but my wallet rules over my priciples. Not everyone lives that way, but I'm sure many would agree with me.

      If it was me, I'd buy the Sony vao and reformat the drive. Although you said you won't run MS software, I'd probably go the Wine route and use the Microsoft DLLs from the OEM windows copy for complete compatibility. This would be MY solution if you're looking for a small, x86, slick looking solution (I love those Sony's). If you're a die hard principle man and priciples mean more than money, I'd go with someone's suggestion of just buying a Mac. I'd concider just running OSX and use the Free UNIX addon utilities. If you really wanted a Linux only machine, I think the arguement of standard hardware for Mac platforms is very important. I for one hate all the inconcistancies I have with Linux on x86 machines.

    29. Re:money back by vivIsel · · Score: 1

      The "nipple" is not Toshiba's. Theirs is a fine (and green) imitation. The original was concieved of in IBM's Almaden Labs and went into IBM laptops very early on. I can think of a time when a repairman thought the trackpoint couldn't possibly have been a pointing device.

      "It's to hold the screen up!" He said. (:

      I don't understand how people live with touch/trackpads. The trackpoint (because that's what it's called) is infinitely superior in my mind.

    30. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually, "words of wisdom" are interpreted by folks with more than a third grade level of reasoning.

    31. Re:money back by Necron69 · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who has been unemployed for 18 months because he refuses to do anything with Windows. He won't even use Internet Explorer and comes off sounding like a moron when he complains that someone's website doesn't work right with Mozilla.

      Unless you are willing to build your own laptop, you are an idealistic idiot. Go back to the romper room and leave the real world to the adults.

      I've been happily using Linux for over a decade, and I still use Windows all the time too. Each has it's uses.

      - Necron69

    32. Re:money back by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected - I only have ONE laptop, and it's a fine old Toshiba Satellite Pro 490. Built like a tank, hopeless for carrying but with a lovely bright screen and a nice deep keyboard, it's great for using!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    33. Re:money back by arkanes · · Score: 1

      If you didn't agree to the license, then you can sell it regardless. If you DID agree, the point is moot as th license forbids resale.

    34. Re:money back by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      It is called a TrackPoint II or III. I find them to be far and away the best mobile pointing device. In fact, I'm probably going to get a full sized keyboard with one for "quick" mouse access while typing at the desktop.

      I can't stand those pads. Won't have one. Using one instantly creates tension in my hand and forearm and results in total frustration after a few minutes.

      I guess that's why they make vanilla and chocholate.

      Anyway, IBM is responsible for the TrackPoint. Interestingly, the original TrackPoint was actually a track ball.

      -Peter

    35. Re:money back by borkface · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting the important fact (to the poster, anyway) that they don't give any money to Microsoft. Even if they don't install the software, or wipe it off, they have still spent $$ on licensing somewhere along the line. Does Dell offer an OS-less system, or would that go against some kind of agreement with Microsoft?

    36. Re:money back by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      They can say that all they want, but a contract you don't even know about until you buy something is not a contract at all. That's the crux of the current anti-EULA litigation. Sounds more like excuse-making on the part of the OEMs than any sort of sound legal theory to me. Of course, once they have your money, all they really need to say to you is: "If you'd like to return the whole computer for a refund, fine. Otherwise you knew what you were buying... we are not refunding a part of the purchase price because you claim you're not using the software."

      --
      I do not have a signature
    37. Re:money back by arcadesdude · · Score: 1

      No stand is pointless if the seller doesn't have your money.

      --
      --arcades
    38. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice reading comprehension there. He said the iBook was too big and heavy, not too expensive. He also specifically said performance was NOT important. Are you stupid or something?

    39. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Cutting off your nose to spite your face' would apply, too. I admire people who stand up for their principles. But is screwing M$ out of $25 worth not getting that contract or job you need this laptop for? In the real world, the one where rents & mortgages have to get paid, it's not black and white like that. Living in cardboard box under the freeway because you refuse to buy a used laptop that used to have Windows on it is just pathetic.

    40. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean the Boston tea party?

    41. Re:money back by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure there is a great principle involved here. The OS is a component just like any other. It would be just as hard to get a laptop without the screen (Screen manufacturers also make most money from new PCs). They probably could offer it without Windows, or without a screen, but so few people want it that way that they don't bother selling it. Sure, there's more choice with screens, the lack of competition for Windows is the fault of the market more than anything else. MS didn't always have a monopoly. The market gave it to them.

      It's a shame that they don't sell it without Windows, but there's no law that says you can't modify the complete unit by removing the OS. Hell, if you do this, the warantee on the hardware is still valid, which is more than you can say if you replace any other component.

    42. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually screwed up my hand for about three months after using one of those things. I went to a regular mouse and never looked back. Those clits are am ergonomic nightmare.

    43. Re:money back by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Ebay does allow you to sell OEM Windows if you bundle it with hardware (even just a mouse or keyboard). Of course, if you ask Microsoft, they'll interpret it in the strictest possible way, but for purposes of selling on Ebay, you probably won't have a problem. That also assumes that the Windows CD is a full install CD (not a image restore CD) and the certificate of authenticity is in a separate book and not a sticker on the computer case (Dell does this).

    44. Re:money back by AugustFalcon · · Score: 1

      Apple didn't invent the fingerpad. That was actually available on some dedicated word processing machines back in the late 70s. I can't remember the manufacturer but I think their name began with a C and the machines were WYSIWYG. They were physically huge and were priced at about 10K$. I almost talked the senior partners at the law firm into buying a few.

    45. Re:money back by stalky14 · · Score: 1

      I hate nipples AND touchpads (but I hate touchpads more). What The hell happened to trackballs in laptops? I love trackballs, even on my desktop machines.

    46. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is there something wrong with someone standing up for principles?


      Yes, it's called reality, and it's going to be around for quite some time.

    47. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try this
      http://www.emperorlinux.com/index.html#lapto ps
      Some people just don't like windows.....
      He is not whining just want a laptop the way he wants it for his money.

    48. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no current anti-EULA litigation that I'm aware of. There's a lot of sentiment and talk, but can you point to an actual case, or even better a proposed legislative bill?

    49. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The finger pads are an abomination. Even the eraser is better. I like the panasonics with the wheel and touch screen.

    50. Re:money back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft didn't always have a monopoly, but starting from the original IBM PC, they did. So, from 1981, Microsoft has had a monopoly.

    51. Re:money back by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      In 1981, there was plenty of scope for a rival on with MS-DOS compatibility, as well as direct competition for the IBM PC from Apple, amongst others.

      If Microsoft had been less competitive back then, or their competitors moreso, we may have seen IBM or Apple have a monopoly. They certainly didn't have the power to push competitors out of the market until they introduced Windows.

    52. Re:money back by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      Just pay the extra $25 dollars.

      Is there something wrong with someone standing up for principles? I think you should be able to buy hardware without buying software (and iBooks don't accomplish this) , regardless of how little it turns out to be when you work out the math. I'm told that MS makes most of their windows-license money from new PC's, so it certainly is not an insignificant amount ($25 is much less than I have heard from other sources)


      Agreed. I'll bet that whoever said "Just pay the $25 bucks" hasnt donated $25 to the EFF or the FSF. I donate more than that per month to those causes.

      There should be a trend here that when any self respecting slashdot geek has to donate to (i.e. purchase from) an evil empire (e.g. microsoft), that he/she donate an equal or greater amount to the EFF or FSF at that time also. You know, just to help maintain balance in the universe. or something.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    53. Re:money back by Scooter · · Score: 1

      The End User License Agreement is not for the consumer?

    54. Re:money back by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Pay attention. This was posted to the Slashdot front page on the 10th. Article links to even more examples.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    55. Re:money back by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Pay attention. This was posted to the Slashdot front page on the 10th. Article links to even more examples. (now with magical quotation mark in anchor tag).

      Slow down cowboy!

      --
      I do not have a signature
    56. Re:money back by milobloom-ab · · Score: 1
      Is there something wrong with someone standing up for principles?

      Nope, nothing wrong with that. The only question would be, what's your time worth? Divide $25 (or whatever you figure your OEM pays per copy of Window$) by the number of hours you'll spend on the phone trying to convince said OEM to give you a refund or sell you a laptop without an OS. Personally, it wouldn't take me long before I'd say fsck it. But I'm perhaps not as passionate about this as the original poster. :) I like the idea of donating an equivalent or greater amount to EFF or the Free Software Foundation.

  3. Simple solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    File down an iBook.

    1. Re:Simple solution: by ScriptGuru · · Score: 3, Funny

      File down an iBook.
      You mean peel an Apple?

      --
      Yet another signature that refers to itself. The irony and humor is dead.
    2. Re:Simple solution: by punkmanandy · · Score: 1

      maybe if you bake it, it will shrink.

    3. Re:Simple solution: by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Redundant

      When I used to sell Macs, I had an older gentleman come into the store to look at a PowerMac 6500 and he liked the specs and the price, but it was a little too tall to fit into the cabinet that he had designed.

      He asked if he could take a saw and cut it "right about here", as he pointed to the bottom of the empty 5.25" drive bay above the CD-ROM.

      I pleaded with the man to not even consider such a thing. Finally what won him over was when I turned the machine around and showed him that if he did hack it up, he'd remove the DB-15 monitor connection.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:Simple solution: by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      "Excuse me, sir, but I *must* ask you to think of this laptop as though it were your penis. Would you shave off the side of your penis just so it fit into your wife with less effort?" (Oh, my, god, that was so wrong. Sorry, but I couldn't resist.)

  4. No choice--cheaper from major manufacturers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the major manufacturers (== cheap) have a contract with Microsoft which forces them to install Windows.

    from a boot floppy (if you can find a laptop with a floppy drive):
    FORMAT C: /y
    FDISK

    Trust me. It is easier and cheaper--I got my Toshiba Satellite 1115-S103 for $500 and ditched Windows XP and am very happy with the results (cheap but usable).

  5. Emperor Linux by dsb3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://emperorlinux.com/

    The benefit? You get laptops with full knowledge of exactly what does and what doesn't work under linux.

    The catch? You pay the same (or more) as you would in the high street and don't get the shiny Windows CD.

    Frankly ... I say you just buy the machine you want. Don't want windows? Throw the disc out ... you want a computer right? Don't turn everything into a political statement.

    --

    Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    1. Re:Emperor Linux by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Don't want windows? Throw the disc out ... you want a computer right? Don't turn everything into a political statement.

      That disc isn't free. The vendor (should have) paid Microsoft for bundling it with the machine. That cost is passed on to the buyer.

      Also referred to as "the Microsoft tax".

    2. Re:Emperor Linux by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ahh, but the big guys still are cheaper with the windows tax than a smaller company that sells without it. I was in the same position a while back, and just decided it would be much easier and cheaper to go with a toshiba.

    3. Re:Emperor Linux by interiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not JUST a political statement. You're also inadvertantly funding MS's efforts to ensnare you, so it's understandable how one might not want to do that.

    4. Re:Emperor Linux by SuperQ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another nice option for those pesky MS CD's. Get some self-adhesive 1mm thick cork bord, and turn them into nice shiny coasters. Great for putting a nice glass of scotch on.

    5. Re:Emperor Linux by ATMAvatar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't turn everything into a political statement. This is more a consumer statement. Whenever you buy a product, you are in effect "voting for" it. You tell the market that you wanted that particular product and allow company X to produce more of their product Y. If you knowingly buy Windows, you are telling the market "I like Windows!" Whether or not you actually like the OS is irrelevant - you are voting with your money. When you can no longer buy computers without Windows, you have lost the most basic right of a consumer - the ability to choose what product you spend your money on. I would have hoped in a "Democratic" society, this idea would be abhorrent at best. The loss of the basic freedom to buy what you like should anger you. Heil Microsoft, I guess.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    6. Re:Emperor Linux by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. Since a small computer reseller doesn't have the buying power of the industry giants their prices will most definitely be above the prices of the larger OEM's. In some cases the Linux PC sellers seem to just buy retail from whomever, wipe out MS, install Linux, then charge through the nose for the same equipment you could buy for a large percentage less elsewhere. In any case, you are still paying for it in the higher prices charged for the pre-installed Linux PC's. As the original poster said (modified slightly)... Buy the laptop you want at the best price you can find, format the drive, install Linux and chuck the MS CD in the trash. As an added bonus you will truly demonstrate your hatred for the evil MS buy buying one of their products only to throw it in the garbage. That'll show them :-)

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    7. Re:Emperor Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, more like an economic statement: he doesn't want to pay for something he won't use and can't sell.

      Maybe you're the one playing the "political card"?

    8. Re:Emperor Linux by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Actually, you are paying a hell of a lot more. For example, check this out: Ibex. This is a Sony Vaio VX-89 with Linux pre-installed. EmperorLinux charges $2050 for it. Here on the other hand, we have the same product available for $1399. That's right, it's $650 cheaper.


      If that's not a fuck job, I don't know what is. I mean, the evidence here clearly supports that A) when you buy an EmperorLinux laptop, you are clearly still paying the Microsoft tax - they are just wiping Windows XP off of it (or you can still get it dual boot if you want it as such). And B) you are paying a shit price. The worst retail price online I found for the VX-89 was around 1700 dollars. So why not just suck it up and accept that the MS tax is unavoidable for laptops, and buy a decent laptop you like?


      I understand the idea of voting with your dollars, but it doesn't get through to the shitheads at Sony corporate since they are still shipping a Vaio with Windows license to some schlocky overpriced "Linux" reseller. Or find a source of laptops that truly doesn't include the MS tax (they do exist, but I don't know of any super lightweight ones).

    9. Re:Emperor Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can afford nice scotch, and you don't want to shell out for some decent coasters? I'm sure all your guests are very impressed.
      :-P

    10. Re:Emperor Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and whenever you buy a product, or pay your taxes, you're contributing to the military spending of your respective country..which may then be used to kill hundreds of people, whether in defense or otherwise. EVERYTHING can be made into a political statement.

    11. Re:Emperor Linux by nyckidd · · Score: 0

      > As an added bonus you will truly demonstrate your hatred for the evil MS buy buying one of their products only to throw it in the garbage. That'll show them :-)

      No... You would be a dream customer for them if you purchased a license only to throw the software out. Not only would they have collected your license fee, they also get away with not having to pay the potential cost of providing support for the product. Heck, if everyone bought their product and decided not to use it, they could fire their entire support staff.

      Makes me wonder -- since you only purchse a license to use the software -- shouldn't they be required to replace the actual medium the software
      came on, in the event it was unrecoverably damaged or lost somehow?

    12. Re:Emperor Linux by grammar+nazi · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "If you knowingly buy Windows, you are telling the market "I like Windows!" Whether or not you actually like the OS is irrelevant - you are voting with your money."

      Although I agree that you are voting with your money, your assumption, ATMAvatar, isn't exactly correct. You are telling the market, "either I like Windows, or, I like the hardware and care about hardware more than software." The difference between my statement and your statment is the reason that Microsoft spends so much to insure 100% OEM compliance.

      "When you can no longer buy computers without Windows, you have lost the most basic right of a consumer - the ability to choose what product you spend your money on."

      I would argue differently: When you can no longer buy computers without Windows, the market for computers without Windows is too small/unprofitable for a company to take advantage of. I love it when people say, "Microshit is junk/sucks/etc." I always respond that Microsoft must be doing something right, because 90%+ of desktop computers around the world run Windows. There's a obviously a *market* for Windows software and with 90%+ of market penetration, I'd say that Windows is excellent (there's not many products and industries with marketshare like that).


      In a "Democratic" society, the citizens should be making the laws. I get scared when the RIAA, BSA, MPAA has so much lobbying power, because by changing the laws, these companies can make our markets innefficient. However, I'm happy with our capitalist society as it is right now. Even though Microsoft commands a vulgar profit margin on each copy of WindowsXP that it sells (a sign of an inefficient market), I understand that software is a commodity and in the long run (10 years? 5 years?), Microsoft is royally screwed with respect to operating system software. The same holds true for office/productivity software. I kind of feel sorry for them, since the best they can come up with is "XBox".

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
    13. Re:Emperor Linux by rmarll · · Score: 1

      That disc isn't free. The vendor (should have) paid Microsoft for bundling it with the machine. That cost is passed on to the buyer.

      Also referred to as "the Microsoft tax".


      I don't know about anyone else, but it's been years since I acutally got a CD with Windows on it bundled with the machine. (but that's beside the point)

      Alternatively there is the "Apple tax". If they ever garner an appreciable market share we'll be answering this exact same question reguarding iBooks. Fact is the vast(*VAST*) majority of the market doesn't want a machine without an MS or Apple OS. And the bit about the "I'm not going to use and then fighting to get a token rebate that doesn't actually equate to the cost of a Windows license" is just inflamitory trollage. He doesn't really know what a windows liscense costs on those machines, and apparently doesn't know what the acutal rebate is. The cost of processing the rebate is likely as much or more than the liscense to begin with. Certainly, someday we'll have a pure option, but for the time being, making that political statement is going to be expensive.

    14. Re:Emperor Linux by sconeu · · Score: 1

      But he becomes part of Microsoft's "30 Million copies sold last year!" statistics!

      OT, but what the hell... They say "X copies sold"! Not "X copies licensed"! Wouldn't that imply that their EULA is bogus?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    15. Re:Emperor Linux by AdrianG · · Score: 3, Insightful
      • "When you can no longer buy computers without Windows, you have lost the most basic right of a consumer - the ability to choose what product you spend your money on."

      I would argue differently: When you can no longer buy computers without Windows, the market for computers without Windows is too small/unprofitable for a company to take advantage of. I love it when people say, "Microshit is junk/sucks/etc." I always respond that Microsoft must be doing something right, because 90%+ of desktop computers around the world run Windows. There's a obviously a *market* for Windows software and with 90%+ of market penetration, I'd say that Windows is excellent (there's not many products and industries with marketshare like that).

      Nonsense. MicroSoft has been engaged in conduct that violates anti-trust laws, and much of their financial success is based on their predatory conduct, not on the merits of their products.

      To me (and apparently to the author of this topic article) paying money to MicroSoft is like supporting organized crime. I'm not going to admire organized crime for its financial success and conceed that it "must be doing something right," even if I am trapped into having to deal with them, somehow.

      When MicroSoft plays fair (or at least plays legal) and makes a big profit, I'll be impressed. As long as they continue their criminal conspiracy to violate antitrust laws, I'm going to continue to feel soiled every time I'm touched in any way by their lousy software.

      Adrian

    16. Re:Emperor Linux by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      You're also inadvertantly funding MS's efforts

      Sell the install disk. Maybe eBay won't let you, under MS pressure, but people managed to sell things before eBay cam along. You have the right to, and someone who wants Windows can get it without MS getting any (more) money, and remember they will hopefully cost MS as the user demands support. (Of course, a laptop probably has a hardware-specific Windows version, or one of those bogus "restore" rather than "install" disks....)

    17. Re:Emperor Linux by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      A) when you buy an EmperorLinux laptop, you are clearly still paying the Microsoft tax - they are just wiping Windows XP off of it (or you can still get it dual boot if you want it as such). And B) you are paying a shit price.

      While you may be right about Windows, there's something you forgot: the care package. You get a physical manual. You get boot disks and system boot preconfigured. You get a system installation customized for that particular laptop model. And most importantly, you get really good tech support. One of my friends has a laptop by them (not that specific model though), and she says that the tech support is more than worth the added price. She isn't a total newbie, either, she's gotten a bunch of help with network problems (Harvard network's fault, not Emperor's), adding an ancient hacked 802.11b card on, etc etc.

      Remember that time is money, and how much time would you spend custom-compiling your kernel, adding on whatever obscure hardware, and other tasks that these guys can help you with.

      Note for the skeptical: I'm a Harvard student and a Mac zealot, not an Emperor Linux sales rep. I'm just passing on a strongly positive review.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    18. Re:Emperor Linux by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Sell the install disk. Maybe eBay won't let you, under MS pressure, but people managed to sell things before eBay cam along. You have the right to

      Actually, you don't...that's the whole idea behind an OEM license, it's not to be separated from the computer it came with.

      Secondly, install disk? You'll be lucky to have the actual cab files from the CD somewhere on the harddisk. If you aren't lucky they're located in a hidden partition somewhere where only the special "recovery disc" can access it. Sure, you can access it with a little effort, and burn a cd from it, but little point in selling that, is there?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    19. Re:Emperor Linux by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Actually, you don't...that's the whole idea behind an OEM license, it's not to be separated from the computer it came with.

      That's debatable. The OEM signed a contract with MS, you didn't. In some places, like Germany, there have been specific rulings allowing resale by "consumers". In other places, sellers include a token piece of hardware (a resistor, a dead PCI card, etc). In any case, I haven't heard of this actually coming to court in the US, though a lot of intimidation (like eBay pulling almost any sale of MS software) and FUD is about.

    20. Re:Emperor Linux by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      Custom compiling a Linux kernel? Ya know, I've installed Linux Mandrake 8.1, 8.2, and 9.0 several times on desktop and laptop systems in the last few years, and haven't had to do a kernel recompile since I-don't-remember-when. Sure, back in the old days (97,98 when I started using Linux fairly seriously) it was kernel recompiles galore. I guess on particularly weird hardware you might need to do a kernel recompile, but I've found at least with Dell laptops, that a stock Mandrake installation works like a charm. Thank god people have finally realized the wonders of the module system. In any case, paying 100-150 bucks extra would be reasonable for tech support availability and shipping the laptop imaged with a preconfigured Linux distro. 500-600 dollars is ridiculous however.


      Incidentally, I graduated from Harvard '00. Back when I was an undergrad, we had a shitty network, shitty computers, shitty support, AND WE LIKED IT. Okay, just kidding. We used to joke that Harvard was a $30,000 a year bandwidth pipe (and social club). And damn did we use it - my suitemate senior year had a 20 gig MP3 stash shared on his FTP server, open to any Harvard IP addresses.

    21. Re:Emperor Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Alternatively there is the "Apple tax". If they ever garner an appreciable market share we'll be answering this exact same question reguarding iBooks.

      The difference is that Apple sells computers and software... MS just sells software. You will never, ever, ever be in a position of having to pay Apple anything for a [Toshiba | Sony | Dell] laptop.

      Oh, unless you count FireWire licensing! ;-)

    22. Re:Emperor Linux by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      And most importantly, you get really good tech support. One of my friends has a laptop by them (not that specific model though), and she says that the tech support is more than worth the added price.

      So then by that logic the cost of ownership of Linux is more than $650 the first year. Sheesh. And they say Macs are expensive.

    23. Re:Emperor Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand that software is a commodity and in the long run (10 years? 5 years?), Microsoft is royally screwed with respect to operating system software.

      Software is nothing like a commodity, despite Windows' economy of scale. And if you don't understand why, then I should treat your opinions re capitalism with extreme caution!

    24. Re:Emperor Linux by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      yeah, but we don't get to VOTE for Bill Gates, do we?

      schmuck

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    25. Re:Emperor Linux by lambadomy · · Score: 1

      Even though Microsoft commands a vulgar profit margin on each copy of WindowsXP that it sells (a sign of an inefficient market)

      How is Microsoft exercising its monopoly power a "sign of an inefficient market". It has nothing to do with the efficiency of the software market and everything to do with what happens when you have a monopoly. You're correct, microsoft is doing something right - using their monopoly to the fullest advantage.

      I'm so sick of people on slashdot talking about "the market" and how it will cure all of these ills. The market can very well be what creates monopolies. The market is full of externalities that will never be corrected for without legislation or some other non market action.
      Truthfully, it's a pointless argument. Almost nowhere do markets just operate without any government intervention. To say that changing the laws can make markets inefficient is perfectly true - but some other law can improve its efficieny, often due only to market flaws, but sometimes just because a previous law that the new law affects is even worse. Maybe your fear of "RIAA, BSA, MPAA" lobbying means you think that lobbying by people you like to create laws is perfectly fine, but I suspect that any legislation that affects your precious markets is anathema to you.

    26. Re:Emperor Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always respond that Microsoft must be doing something right, because 90%+ of desktop computers around the world run Windows

      Yeah illegal monopolizing tactics must be "something right". The Columbians must be doing something right, I mean they have 90% of the worlds cocaine. 90% of the people in the world aren't smart enough to know how a computer works. But they must be doing something right cause they are 90% of the world!!

    27. Re:Emperor Linux by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      Just think of it as buying an expensive coaster for your can of Jolt to sit on ;0

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    28. Re:Emperor Linux by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      What about the nice little XBox I just bought on the weekend...it has that filthy MS logo all over it.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    29. Re:Emperor Linux by Fratz · · Score: 1

      I love it when people say, "Microshit is junk/sucks/etc." I always respond that Microsoft must be doing something right, because 90%+ of desktop computers around the world run Windows. There's a obviously a *market* for Windows software and with 90%+ of market penetration, I'd say that Windows is excellent (there's not many products and industries with marketshare like that).
      This doesn't make Windows excellent; it merely means Microsoft was in the right place at the right time and had an excellent marketing and sales division to keep them there.

      I worked in a medical device company, and we partnered with a company who had 95% market share in their field. So they must have had the best technology, right? No, they just got there first and saturated the market in the absence of competition. Any time we had a question about their system not being as accurate as we expected, their response was to quote their market share at us, rather than address the technical issues.

      So forgive me if I don't think "95% market share" == "excellent"

      --
      -- Fratz, human
    30. Re:Emperor Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Sony Vaio I bought from them 14 months ago and the support was ok, it seems like a one man shop. I got the Windows CD with it, they just erased the partition. The thing is, they promise that "everything works" in linux, you don't have to fsck around with USB, APM, firwire, sound drivers, CD-RW/SCSI emulation - that was worth the premium to me, or to avoid having to shop around and Ask Slashdot et al which laptop works best with Linux. But -- APM does NOT work on this friggen thing, or any other Vaio for that matter, and yet they knowingly sold it to me despite claims that 'everything works'. And it was a turd of a price. So screw it, buy an IBM on eBay for like $900 and figure it out yourself, its the only way to do it right.

    31. Re:Emperor Linux by kraksmoka · · Score: 1
      Sell the install disk. Maybe eBay won't let you, under MS pressure, but people managed to sell things before eBay cam along. You have the right to

      Actually, you don't...that's the whole idea behind an OEM license, it's not to be separated from the computer it came with.

      depending on which manufacturer it comes from, the separation of manufacturer and disk becomes more and more dicey. some OEMs, usually the smaller ones will give you a fairly generic windows disk, that could theoretically install on any machine. many OEMs however, give you a very cusomized disk (like HP, IBM, Sony) that only works on the model of machine you get the disk with. it scans for something probably in the BIOS to figure out if it is the right machine and blocks much from happening on non-OEM equipment for that disk.

      sounds to me like you wanna be running OS X and Debian PPC brother. forget the x86 garbage. didn't you see, even with emperor linux, you'll be buying a copy of windows from sony.

      --
      "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
    32. Re:Emperor Linux by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1
      I would argue differently: When you can no longer buy computers without Windows, the market for computers without Windows is too small/unprofitable for a company to take advantage of. I love it when people say, "Microshit is junk/sucks/etc." I always respond that Microsoft must be doing something right, because 90%+ of desktop computers around the world run Windows. There's a obviously a *market* for Windows software and with 90%+ of market penetration, I'd say that Windows is excellent (there's not many products and industries with marketshare like that).

      You took a nap during the entire anti-trust trial, didn't you?

      The reason that Windows runs on so many systems is, in part, because it came pre-installed. For a long time it came pre-installed because if a computer manufacturer shipped computers without Windows, the price they paid for Windows jumped so high as to erase the savings of not purchasing as many copies. IBM tried to make another OS available (OS/2), Microsoft denied IBM access to Windows 95 long enough that IBM was late to enter that market and lost a great deal of money. For doing something as innocent as shipping an alternative web browser companies Windows also dominates because it enjoys the network effect. The most popular operating system draws developers targetting the biggest market, which increases the value of the operating system, increasing its popularity. This has nothing to do with the quality of Windows, just the old adage that the rich get richer. Any possible competitor faces very stiff barriers to entry.

      My local phone company has a market share in that area, but it similarly has nothing to do with quality and value and everything to do with having a (state-sanctioned in this case) monopoly.

      At one point Microsoft did have to compete for operating system share and customers had real choices. Even with IBM effectively handing Microsoft a monopoly on PC operating systems they had to fight for their position. Unfortunately that was a long time ago. The claim that Microsoft continues earns their position is naive.

      Perhaps you should review the findings of fact from the recent anti-trust case. These findings remain the court's official judgement on Microsoft's behavior. While it focuses on web browsers, it does document their monopoly power and willingness to abuse it.

    33. Re:Emperor Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order to engage in anti-competitive behavior as Microsoft has, you have to have a monopoly first. Microsoft got in trouble because they used their dominance in the OS market to push other products. For this to work, you need to have a monopoly on the desktop OS market, with Windows. That means people had to already have Windows - it had to already be some popular for them to do what you fault them for! There's only one way to engage in monopoly practices in this day and age - have an excellent product to break into one market first!

    34. Re:Emperor Linux by vroomfondel · · Score: 1

      In a truly free market, there is no problem with using the behavior of that market to determine the value of a given product. That said, no market is truly, completely free; all have competitive and/or financial barriers to entry of some kind. In some industries, like telecommunications or chip fabrication, these barriers are extremely large and equally obvious.

      Software, however, is by and large an industry with very few readily apparent barriers to entry. The finanical barriers are in fact so low that in several sub-markets a free competitor has emerged, prompting many people like yourself to declare software a commodity. While that's true in a sense, it is like the free market analysis in this case -- it misses an important piece of the puzzle.

      Microsoft has been extraordinarily successful over the years for a number of reasons. They have been greatly aided by the stupidity and/or shortsightedness of their early competitors, which is not something that should be held against them, but it is also not the primary factor in their success. What drives their success is the fact that Microsoft was the first software company to understand the hidden barriers to entry in the software business: mindshare and customer lock-in.

      No other market with the same dynamics comes to mind. A company buying a competing OS or office/productivity suite faces potentially having to retrain their entire workforce, throwing away the money they already spent training the same people how to use the Microsoft products. How many people's parents have taken a class in Word or Excel? Other lock-in issues, like proprietary document formats and hardware compatibility, provide customers with artificial incentives to maintain the status quo not found in most other markets.

      Microsoft was the first software company to really understand these issues. They understood them so well that they fought every way they could -- not all of them legal -- to increase market share. While it could be argued quite successfully that Microsoft's early success was based on their value proposition, much of their current success owes more to that early success than it owes to anything in their value proposition today.

    35. Re:Emperor Linux by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Regardless, selling the install disk is useless as you cannot install windows from it. OEMs now have an installation partition and the install/repair disk just calls the program on that partition. If you blow this partition away or don't have it on the target computer, then you can't reinstall. If you move the harddrive to another computer, the install typically won't work (it can, but often it won't because it'll be set up to look for your motherboard type). If you sell the disc, harddisk, and motherboard, then you've essentially sold the computer.

      --
      -no broken link
    36. Re:Emperor Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not JUST a political statement. You're also inadvertantly funding MS's efforts to ensnare you, so it's understandable how one might not want to do that.

      That IS the political statement. Christ.

    37. Re:Emperor Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a obviously a *market* for Windows software and with 90%+ of market penetration, I'd say that Windows is excellent (there's not many products and industries with marketshare like that).

      What an asinine thing to say. That's like saying, since the Communists in China command 100% of the vote, it must mean that the Communist government is excellent.

    38. Re:Emperor Linux by tshak · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but especially after Win2K came out, there was no better desktop alternative (disclaimer: At work I had two boxes, an RH 6 box and a Win2K box). MacOS at the time was good for a narrow set of applications, but it was still that same-old-quircky Mac interface, with the lack of good memory management or efficient multitasking. Linux, well, I can't tell you how often Linux crashed on me. It was such a PITA that I simply stopped using the GUI, and I just went back to the "good ol' days" of using emacs to script up perl for our Apache server. So, yes Linux had a nice CLI, I wouldn't put that infront of my mother.

      Linux has done a lot to catch up, but I still wouldn't implement it on the desktop for a large company. MacOS has made leaps and bounds, to the point where I've stopped turning my nose at Apple, and now have a huge respect for their technology. Still, MacOS X is a recent development, and until then, I'd say that one can objectively prove that Windows was hands down the best desktop OS. Now, I think it's arguable, but that just means that there's no clear winner.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    39. Re:Emperor Linux by FFON · · Score: 0

      sir, that *is* a political statement.. please oh please don't be a teacher..

      --
      .cig
    40. Re:Emperor Linux by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1
      I'm so sick of people on slashdot talking about "the market" and how it will cure all of these ills. The market can very well be what creates monopolies. The market is full of externalities that will never be corrected for without legislation or some other non market action.

      Exactly.

      Whether or not the market actually creates monopolies is no longer of interest when it comes to Microsoft. I'm not sure how easy to prove it would be, either. However, I think the case can be made successfully that the market perpetuates monopolies. Let's just look at the situation:

      Developers write software for Windows because it is the most popular OS. The more software that it written exclusively for Windows, the more popular it becomes.
      You can only accept the possibility of the market fixing things if you ignore this principle.

      There's a obviously a *market* for Windows software and with 90%+ of market penetration, I'd say that Windows is excellent (there's not many products and industries with marketshare like that).


      Windows is hardly on top because it's the best product. It's on top now simply because it was on top before. It was on top before because Microsoft successfully leveraged Windows onto virtually every new computer sold. As far as I can tell, there was no point at which Windows success was ever affected by consumer choice. At no point has Windows ever been the best OS on the market. Microsoft simply forced itself onto computers and the cycle took over from there.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    41. Re:Emperor Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, I think the case can be made successfully that the market perpetuates monopolies.

      Sure. The market efficiency gained by having "standard" software easily covers the extra few bucks in 'microsoft tax' per system.

      Furthermore, theres no evidence that other system software could be delivered more efficiently. The support structure for Linux currently doesn't compare favorably, for example.

      At no point has Windows ever been the best OS on the market.

      Define "Best".

      Windows had the smallest hardware requirements, the widest range of hardware compatibility, the most drivers (via DOS driver support), and the best support for existing DOS applicaitons, and the best 3rd party developer support (due to MS evangalism) of any OS on the open market.

      Sure it didn't have Crash Protection(tm) or anything fancy like OS/2 did. But OS/2 was also an expensive dog that had compatibility problems and a developer-hostile owner.

    42. Re:Emperor Linux by jargon · · Score: 1

      Well...yes you do.

      Here in America, we are Capitalist.
      In Capitalism, you "vote" with your dollars. The idea being that you will reward those who make superior products with control of a market.

      That's really the source of this Ask Slashdot - the asker does not want to vote for Bill Gates - and he has every right not to. That's how it works. When it works...

      --
      /dev/psychic: No medium found
    43. Re:Emperor Linux by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      This isn't always an option. Some laptops, like the Toshiba Satellite 5200, that I recently purchased, require ACPI for PCI interupt routing, and this isn't an option that can be loaded as a module. It's either on, or off, or disabled via a kernel parameter. Without ACPI, my sound card, and modem are not assigned IRQs (AMR/CMR devices). To make things worse, the only BIOS setup must be done through Windows XP's control panel, so wiping XP isn't even an option. (Although DVD-R burning and mastering in Linux isn't exactly 'there' yet, so XP has to be used yet again.)

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    44. Re:Emperor Linux by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      that is because the little guys buy in bulk from sony/ibm usually, reconfigure it as a "linux laptop" and sell it to you at a premium. i mean come on, a Vaoi R505 series starting at $2000? they start at $1799 from sony, with the MS tax.

      this is not 1996, it is no longer hard to install linux yourself. hell i can do it.

    45. Re:Emperor Linux by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      either you are incredibly naiive, you haven't heard of "market failure" or you missed the whole DOJ/MS case.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    46. Re:Emperor Linux by jargon · · Score: 1

      Of course the system is far from perfect.
      Monopoly is one way that the system can break down; however, as you can see there are other options, they are just non-optimal (expensive and/or too big).

      You do still have voting power with your dollars.
      I spend more money on many things in order to buy locally and avoid companies like Walmart.

      --
      /dev/psychic: No medium found
    47. Re:Emperor Linux by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      I think she got one of the less inflated models, only a hundred or two hundred above the "Windows" price.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  6. dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    dunno

    1. Re:dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pull my finger, and mod *me* up as funny too!!

  7. Sharp Makes One... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sharp has some pretty sweet VERY thin and LIGHT nitebooks. They have windows on em though. But easy enough to format :-) has all the ports you want, and more.

    Actius UM32W is what it's called.

    I have been on the same hunt as you for a month now :-)

  8. Linux laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Have you looked at Qli Linux Laptops?

    1. Re:Linux laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ray had a mullet

  9. Good luck! by Zameir · · Score: 1

    I feel for you. I recently was considering buying a laptop from Dell for network testing purposes. I emailed them asking if they would sell it without an OS as I wanted to only use Linux on it. I got no reply surprisingly enough, so I can only assume that they will not sell it without an OS. Keep trying though, I'm sure someone will sell it without an OS.

    1. Re:Good luck! by npietraniec · · Score: 1

      I thought dell was selling computers with freedos... or is the corporate desktops only? Anyone know?

    2. Re:Good luck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those commie fuckers.

    3. Re:Good luck! by CaramelCod · · Score: 1
      Dell sells servers with no OS, but all other systems come with Windows. My current SC500 Dell server is running RH7.3. I could have had them install that for me as well - but I prefer to do it myself.

      Buy a high end used laptop and wipe the drive.

    4. Re:Good luck! by InsaneBoi · · Score: 1

      I actually called Dell Customer Service last summer about purchasing a desktop with no OS. After harassing a few employees and getting to a supervisor, I got the answer of no, they will not sell a computer without Windows, UNLESS I was making a large multi-computer order, in which case they may consider selling me a computer without Windows.

      Their excuse for not selling me a computer without Windows was that they needed the windows OS for hardware testing before it left their plant.

  10. 12" Apple PowerBook by elysian1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Small, lightweight, runs Unix, nice GUI, long battery life, etc...

    1. Re:12" Apple PowerBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but he'd have to buy a mac.

    2. Re:12" Apple PowerBook by mjolner · · Score: 1
      Or, maybe not if he wants to run Linux. There are only x86-compiled drivers for the nVidia chip. The iBook on the other hand is 500USD cheaper, and you can get drivers for the Radeon 7500 chip.

      Gentoo's supposed to be pretty fast on a low-to-medium end iBook.

    3. Re:12" Apple PowerBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      battey life on the 12" pBook sucks (i own one, i know). i've owned a iBook 800MHz as well and i can honestly say the battery life rocks!

      this fool should go with the $999 iBook. wireless ready and it's not that heavy. if he wants a subnotebook (something smaller), he can expect to pay a whole hell of a lot more!

    4. Re:12" Apple PowerBook by supabeast! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree wholeheartedly. I love my ibook, and as much as I critcise Apple for their pricing, my biggest regret from buying it was not spending more money to get a really nice one. Apple laptops rock, because they just WORK. No freaky crashes, no weird laptop driver issues, they just work. OS X gives me all the UNIX stuff and all the slick GUI and supported hardware goodness I ever need.

      Now if they were just affordable to the masses....

    5. Re:12" Apple PowerBook by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. PCs never really quite work right (especially laptops.) After owning several wintel laptops, I can honestly say my iBook is far and away the best laptop I've ever owned. And I've owned Vaios, Thinkpads, etc. I'll gladly pay the premium just to have a laptop that works predictably.

    6. Re:12" Apple PowerBook by dootbran · · Score: 1

      I never realized that laptops had such problems. My ibook is the only laptop I've ever owned and I don't think I would ever go back to Windows.

    7. Re:12" Apple PowerBook by CompVisGuy · · Score: 1

      Buy the 12" iBook (or the 12" PowerBook).

      I'm using a 12" iBook right now, and it's the best computer I've ever used (and I've used PCs with MS-DOS, Windows 3.1-XP, Amiga, Solaris, HP-UX...).

      The engineering quality is fantastic -- far better than any PC I've seen, and the software/hardware integration is wonderful -- you won't achieve this on Windows or Linux.

      Things just work. There are no configuration or set-up hassles (install a WiFi card -- it just woorks; plug in a digital camera -- it just works; plug in the printer -- it just works).

      You get the best UI around at the moment, plus an Open Source UNIX OS, and all the UNIX tools you'd get or want on Linux (SSH, Perl, Apache...). You can run GNOME, KDE etc. X windows....

      Please don't buy a PC. The PC hardware definition is so outdated and poor, and compatibility is awful.

      I'm never going back to the PC if I can help it. Apple make wonderful machines.

      --


      "The noble art of losing face will one day save the human race"---Hans Blix
  11. Powerbook? by ThorGod · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm in a similar situation, only I've never owned a Mac. Anyway, I think I've decided upon buying a 12" powerbook (and yes, I read the reviews of them). Not sure if that's too rich for your blood but it sounds like a good deal to me.

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    1. Re:Powerbook? by bp33 · · Score: 1

      I just went through the same thing. I bought a 12" Powerbook. My first Mac ever.

      I switched from a 12" Sony Vaio (running Win2K). The form factor and weight are the same. But the Powerbook has a DVD and CD-RW drive combo built-in, as well as 802.11g, Firewire, and I also use the built-in bluetooth to sync with my Palm Tungsten. And of course, it runs UNIX with a decent GUI on top.

      I've had the machine a little over a week. I'm hooked.

    2. Re:Powerbook? by alpha17 · · Score: 0

      be careful.. those 12" powerbooks are slower than the bigger powerbooks because they have no L3 cache. the 12" performs like it has a G3

    3. Re:Powerbook? by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply! That really makes me more apt to buy one now :)

      How speedy are the graphics? Have you played any games?

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    4. Re:Powerbook? by OmniVector · · Score: 1

      i purchased one of the new 12" powerbooks

      they are worth every penny. beautifuly OSX with the apps of BSD. it's a win win situation.

      --
      - tristan
    5. Re:Powerbook? by gpoul · · Score: 1

      read the benchmarks!

      It's only slower where you really need the L3 cache. If we're just talking computing power it's usually equally fast as the "faster" PBs.

    6. Re:Powerbook? by gpoul · · Score: 1

      I'm currently in the same situation and looked at it last Saturday in a store. Looks like a great little machine.

      But I wouldn't install Linux on it. I'd just live with what is on the machine which didn't look like a bad Unix. - I know of some people who have Linux on their TiBook and it works great but I have no info about the compatibility with Linux on the 12" PB.

    7. Re:Powerbook? by TiMac · · Score: 1
      What?! I have used a 12 inch Powerbook extensively (though I don't own one) and it kicks the crap out of every G3 machine I've used.

      Why? Well...the fastest G3 Macs sold now are 800 Mhz iBooks...with a 100 Mhz bus, ATA/66 drive, Radeon 7500, etc...and 512K of L2 cache (IIRC). The new 12 inch Powerbook is an 867 G4 with 133 bus, DDR RAM, ATA/100 drive, GeForce4 Go, and 256K of L2 cache...right?

      So right there the new Powerbook's specs more than trump even the fastest G3s...and that's not taking into account all the Altivec-enabled applications out there.....like....say.....OS X JAGUAR!

      Believe me. The 12 inch Powerbook screams. It's making me very strongly consider selling my 15 inch Titanium/667 (which is itself faster than those G3s...).

      --

    8. Re:Powerbook? by bp33 · · Score: 1

      No idea on the graphics, I'm not a game player so my demands are pretty light.

    9. Re:Powerbook? by Kruid · · Score: 1

      Bought a 15" last week, and loving it. My Linux machine is still here, but I haven't had a need to touch it, could be sold soon... I've had no trouble compiling a number of apps I like on the powerbook, and have get excellent connectivity to my cable modem, internal network at the office, and customer sites. It's a pleasure not having to dual boot for specific tasks, or maintain multiple systems.

      --
      Your mind moves quicker than a nun's first curry. - A. Rimmer
  12. buy used. by morgajel · · Score: 4, Informative

    that's what I did. it did come with win98, but I deleted it right off.
    just be careful when buying used- I made the mistake of buying from a tradeshow and it took 2 months before I could get a usable one.

    I did end up with a gateway solo2150 which is working pretty well.

    if you're not playing games, a 600 mhz will work fine. I have kde 3.1 and openoffice on debian and it runs with little lag.

    --
    Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    1. Re:buy used. by Mark+(ph'x) · · Score: 1

      600mhz will be fine? are you serious? i thought linux (i havent used it for years) could do better than that?

      *pulls up terminal services to kalashikov*

      very little lag here in word... on a celeron 366 running win2k advanced server (and theres 2 users on it and god knows how many services...)

      --
      those who control the past, control the future. those who control the present, control the past.
    2. Re:Buy used. by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      Dell's Outlet is also probably a good place to look for higher end refurb machines. they have a few notebooks on there you might be interested in. you might end up paying the "microsoft tax", but at least you know you can install whatever the hell you want on your system and if something fails, you can return it and have them fix it for free.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    3. Re:Buy used. by cgleba · · Score: 1

      There are some good HP Omnibook 510s on ebay. Nice, small, fast, have most of your requirements and Linux works pretty well on it. I have a pavillion zu1175 (same as Omnibook 500) and run Linux exclusively with no complaints.

    4. Re:buy used. by skillet-thief · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bought a refurbished Thinkpad from a little mom-n-pop used computer store. They actually bought the Windows licence back from me, for about $40, so they could put it on someone else's machine.

      (Only problem with the Thinkpad 600 now is the battery issue, as previously discussed not so long ago on /. here.)

      --

      Congratulations! Now we are the Evil Empire

    5. Re:buy used. by morgajel · · Score: 1

      ok, perhaps I should clarify-
      I'm running a gateway solo2150 as previously mentioned.
      600mhz... as I said, it works fine even with the eyecandy of openoffice and kde3.1.
      the only think I wish it had was more ram- it's currently got 128 megs, which is fine, but you can NEVER have enough ram:)

      Now, my laptop wouldn't qualify for what he wants due to the weight(it's a brick), but my point was to look into used laptops. Toshiba's make nice light laptops.

      Someone else mentioned battery life- if you're getting a laptop for $700(the price of mine) instead of $1000 buy a new battery and quit your bitching.
      my battery has a life of around 2-3 hours, and I was too broke to buy a new one.

      when I said my laptop was good enough, I meant it. This was the best hardware purchase I've ever made. Now I do all of my development on it, and it comes with me wherever I go- to class, the in-laws, or any other place I don't want to be.

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    6. Re:Buy used. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me that it doesn't take much time at all to 'scrape windows off the hard drive'. My Mandrake install asked to remove it for me!

    7. Re:Buy used. by Covant · · Score: 1

      Good idea, especially if bleeding edge isn't necessary. Unfortunately, for some, even slightly used equipment is too old. Many businesses can't buy used equipment.

      What can a company do if they want to buy 1000 identical laptops without bending over for MSFT?

      --
      "Peace, Love and Apathy"
    8. Re:Buy used. by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      I fully agree with you. If your are not into gaming or other graphic intensive applications, buy a used laptop and install linux.

  13. Rationale, or lack thereof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll make an educated guess that 99% of laptop vendors will force you to buy Windows with your laptop. So, instead of purchasing the best hardware for your money by choosing from 100% of laptop vendors, you're going to limit yourself to the selection that 1% of the vendors provide. That makes a lot of sense. Good luck and keep dreaming.

  14. powernotebooks.com by da007 · · Score: 5, Informative

    www.powernotebooks.com

    windows tax not required. was in a slashdot article awhile back.

    1. Re:powernotebooks.com by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Warning: off-topic post about parent's sig ahead.

      while(reading_slashdot == TRUE){
      ++nerdiness;
      --social_life; }

      How about,

      while(reading_slashdot){++nerdiness;--social_life}

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    2. Re:powernotebooks.com by cperciva · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How about,

      while(reading_slashdot){++nerdiness;--social_life}


      Personally, I prefer

      for(;reading_slashdot;++nerdiness) --social_life;

    3. Re:powernotebooks.com by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Funny

      >How about,
      >while(reading_slashdot){++nerdiness;--soc ial_life }

      IANAC (I am not a compiler) but I am guessing your generic C compiler might get pissy about not having a semi-colon before the ending brace.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    4. Re:powernotebooks.com by bmwm3nut · · Score: 1
      or more cryptically:

      while (++nerdiness,--social_life,reading_slashdot);
    5. Re:powernotebooks.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public Sub StupidFuckingSlashdotSig()

      Dim reading_slashdot As Boolean
      Dim nerdiness As Integer
      Dim social_life As Integer

      While (reading_slashdot)
      nerdiness = nerdiness + 1
      social_life = social_life - 1
      Wend

      End Sub

    6. Re:powernotebooks.com by MShook · · Score: 1

      for (;reading_slashdot;++nerdiness, --social_life);

    7. Re:powernotebooks.com by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 2, Funny
      or even:

      while (reading_slashdot) nerdiness++, social_life--;

    8. Re:powernotebooks.com by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      IAAC, and no, I don't like it.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    9. Re:powernotebooks.com by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1


      while (reading_slashdot == TRUE)
      {
      ++nerdiness;
      --social_life;
      }


      Remember to declare reading_slashdot as volatile, or the compile will optimize the comparison out of the loop - it doesn't see anything in the loop that can change the true or falseness of the comparison, so optimize that comparison out of the way. Of course that assumes that someone reading slashdot will at sometime actually get a life and stop reading, which may be assuming a bit much, so maybe having it like that is a better model.

    10. Re:powernotebooks.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not quite the same: nerdiness increases even when not reading slashdot.

    11. Re:powernotebooks.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You win.

    12. Re:powernotebooks.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or better yet:

      "This is english.
      People who talk in code are complete nerds."

    13. Re:powernotebooks.com by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      while (++nerdiness,--social_life,reading_slashdot);

      You should use a for loop, it's more efficient.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    14. Re:powernotebooks.com by WaKall · · Score: 1

      Missing a loop update in your .sig. Have a fun life.

    15. Re:powernotebooks.com by slammersRus · · Score: 1

      a more concise implementation:)

      while (reading_slashdot)
      social_life=-(++nerdiness);

    16. Re:powernotebooks.com by okeby235 · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I understood what that ancronym meant... worse still i found it funny.

      fuck i am a nerd!

    17. Re:powernotebooks.com by zsazsa · · Score: 1

      Discount Laptops is another online vendor that sells laptops made by the same ODMs that provide Dell, Toshiba, and others with their laptops. The good thing about this is that the ODMs don't put Windows on their machines.

    18. Re:powernotebooks.com by Visaris · · Score: 1

      > while(reading_slashdot){++nerdiness;--social_life }
      could be better:

      while(reading_slashdot) ++nerdiness, --social_life;

      :smiles: Much better :)

      --

      I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
    19. Re:powernotebooks.com by A_Duck_Named_Ping · · Score: 1

      for (;reading_slashdot==TRUE;++nerdiness,--social_life ){;}

    20. Re:powernotebooks.com by pomakis · · Score: 1
      or more cryptically:

      Not the same! Your code will ++nerdiness and --social_life at least once, even if reading_slashdot isn't true. (a la a do loop). Of course, by posting this I've just nerdiness<<2 and social_life>>2.

    21. Re:powernotebooks.com by Lozzer · · Score: 1

      Thats a gross generalization about every meaningful C compiler/architecture combination under the sun. Including those that have not yet been written.

      --
      Special Relativity: The person in the other queue thinks yours is moving faster.
    22. Re:powernotebooks.com by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Thats a gross generalization about every meaningful C compiler/architecture combination under the sun. Including those that have not yet been written.

      Thank you, I wasn't sure if anybody was going to get the joke...

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    23. Re:powernotebooks.com by Lozzer · · Score: 1

      Aww, there goes another attempt on my part to give up caffeine on a Monday morning. Hand me a LART somebody.

      --
      Special Relativity: The person in the other queue thinks yours is moving faster.
    24. Re:powernotebooks.com by jacrawf · · Score: 1
      It would almost be legitimate if it were Perl code, though, with a few small adjustments since you don't need a semicolon for the last statement in a block.

      while(&reading_slashdot){++$nerdiness; --$social_life}

    25. Re:powernotebooks.com by bmwm3nut · · Score: 1
      yeah i caught that after i hit post. i'm dumb. you also should have used
      nerdiness<<=2
      and
      social_live>>=2
      if you wanted to save your state.
    26. Re:powernotebooks.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      W23923 (Pedantic): Why is everyone assuming that the original poster's TRUE had non-zero value?

      I once had the misfortune to work on a project that had switched the convention of success and failure function return values midstream, so they had an old_success/old_failure and new_success/new_failure enums (I think they switched the value of success from 0 to 1) and you had to know which function returned which.

      Okay, that's not quite as bad as exchanging the meaning of truth and falsehood but it still felt a little kafkaesque...

  15. used? by E.+T.+Alveron · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Save a buck or two by going used.

    Though the Microsoft tax has been levied on the system, you won't be adding to MS's coffers, and can get a jolly good 3 pounder for a grand or so.

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. Cheap Laptops by monthos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I too havent found the right solution yet where i dont have to give some company money for crap i will never use. just please dont get pissed off and buy any laptop and pay the microsoft tax, becouse it just reports to there numbers as how many "users" there are. untill i find a solution that i can live with, and not pay MORE for the luxary of not having to purchase an operating system, i will not purchase a laptop. i am not afraid of doing without, and neither should you.

    1. Re:Cheap Laptops by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      You would pay more for a laptop that came without Windows than for an identically powered machine -cheaper- from say ... Dell or IBM, simply on moral grounds?

      Lets pretend that there were two laptops, identical, one from ThinkGeek without WinXP for $2800, and the same machine from Dell with XP for $2500 - you would buy the one from ThinkGeek even if the hardware was identical (think OEM) ?

      Wow, that's amazing.

      *haven't
      *where I don't
      *crap I will never
      *use. Just
      *the Microsoft tax,
      *tax, because it
      *to their numbers
      *are. Until I find
      *that I can
      *with and not pay
      *luxury
      *system, I will
      *laptop. I am
      *without and neither

      There are 2 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand hexadecimal, and those that don't.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:Cheap Laptops by monthos · · Score: 1

      i dunno why i am replying to a troll, but what the hell, why not.

      First off i never said i would pay more, rather i said i would NOT buy one until i didnt have to pay more , care to read it again, second this is not an essay, nor any form of a official document what so ever, therefor i will not use proper grammer and if i choose to mispell or trim down words to make myself happy i will do so.

      to sum it all up, you really need to read what people say before you attempt a quick witted reply to make fun of them, when all you did was try to argue with someone making the exact same point you did about the price difference.

    3. Re:Cheap Laptops by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Yea, the second half was trolling, I'm just funning with you there >:)

      The top part was serious though - it looked to me like you were advocating paying more for a system without (because anybody that sells without is a small time player, and the big dogs can sell em cheaper even with...)

      The guy wants a laptop. Nobody sells them without an OS, particularly WinXP or 2000 (or Apple's X) - well a few do but they don't move enough product to sell them at commodity prices.

      If his choices are :
      Buy the Apple he was considering,
      Buy a more expensive no OS clone,
      Buy a less expensive HP/IBM/DELL/whatever that happens to come with Windows,
      Buy a used machine (which I proposed higher up)
      Buy nothing (which you are proposing) ...

      If you are really serious about it, most of the majors will send you a machine without an OS. They are not going to support you when you need Linux drivers, and they are not going lower the price any (they are not charging you more for the system with an OS, and they are not charging you less for a system without.)

      Does this then fit your ideal views?
      It is better than the other suggestion of 'NOT buy one until i didnt have to pay more' - aye?

      We both want to help the guy out, that is why we are here. I was hassling you, I apologize.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    4. Re:Cheap Laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I certainly wouldn't pay $300 more to not get XP Home edition. It would have to at least be XP Pro I was paying to not get. Toss in not getting MS Office for the $300 and it would be a bargain.

    5. Re:Cheap Laptops by monthos · · Score: 1

      I never advocate paying more for less, as a student i understand the financial issues when looking to purchase such a piece of equipment, but i also see this as a major problem, since everyone just sucks it up and purchases the whole package, there isnt a reason for any manufacturer to make the option available. perhaps if enouph people just waited and made out points heard, companies would give us what we want, rather than us buy what we dont just becouse its the only thing available thats close to our satisfaction.

  18. Fujitsu P2000 Series by YokuYakuYoukai · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These are great cursoe based laptops and becides the software based modem everything is linux compatible.

    here is a Link to the fujitsu website for it.

    i have an older version with a slower 800mhz processor and 4 megs of video ram. it struggles with the latest divx encodes unplugged, but plugged in they display fine. The best feature is its real life 8-10 hour battery life. i could never go back to a 2 hour laptop.

    1. Re:Fujitsu P2000 Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a utility that the laptop comes with that allows you to disallow the decreased processor speed when on battery power that ought to help with your divx problem. There are 3 settings: Low power usage, (i.e. 300MHz), High (800MHz or 867 in my case), and Auto, where the computer takes the best of both worlds and supposedly always has enough juice to do stuff and idles the rest of the time.

    2. Re:Fujitsu P2000 Series by asuwish4 · · Score: 1

      Where is this utility? I have a P-2046 and cannot find it. Thanks!

    3. Re:Fujitsu P2000 Series by squant0 · · Score: 1
      I have heard that the keyboards on those are hard to type on, do you think so?

      And other than coming with windows, they look to be great laptops, I was thinking about getting one when I get rid of my IBM thinkpad.

    4. Re:Fujitsu P2000 Series by Kenshiro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm. My hands aren't exactly huge, but the kbd doesn't feel small to me. It does feel a little cheap. It's still better, imo, than most kbds you get with home systems. It doesn't have a hefty click, but you don't wonder which of your keystrokes made it. You just worry that when you typed that last line of code a little too excitedly, you might have taken a week of its life. (Almost a year of ownership, and no failure, though)

      Most of the keys are in decent location, and caps lock, which becomes my ctrl, is nice and wide. Still, whenever I can, I attach my usb ibm kbd.

      Nuisances are the lack of serial or infrared. I haven't checked lately to see whether there are linux drivers for my usb to serial port, without which I can't sync my palm...

      Other nuisance is a *severe* vulnerability to static electricity. Ground yourself before typing, or you'll hear the disk spin down for a few seconds, then back up. It stays up fine, but your, I mean my :), pppoe connection dies in the meantime.

    5. Re:Fujitsu P2000 Series by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      Two complaints people have with the keyboard:

      1. The right shift key is too small, and to the right of the up arrow key. This hasn't been a problem for me, since I never use the right shift key anyways.

      2. The fn key is to the left of the left ctrl key. Lots of people remap this.

    6. Re:Fujitsu P2000 Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      From the fujitsu page:

      "The award-winning product just got better."

      Now isn't that informative?

    7. Re:Fujitsu P2000 Series by Spudley · · Score: 1

      This hasn't been a problem for me, since I never use the right shift key anyways.

      Yeah? So how did you get those capital 'T's in that comment, then?

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    8. Re:Fujitsu P2000 Series by YokuYakuYoukai · · Score: 1

      i have found that even set to "High" divx is choppy unless i am plugged in (using windows 2000 mplayer2 and xvid). im not sure why this is, i can only guess something else is being slowed down by being unplugged.

    9. Re:Fujitsu P2000 Series by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      Yeah? So how did you get those capital 'T's in that comment, then?

      Left shift key, of course. ;-) I know, it's not a good typing habit, but it's served me well with this notebook.

    10. Re:Fujitsu P2000 Series by crimson30 · · Score: 0

      It's not a bad notebook. I've got a 933 and it'sok. My only complaints would be the "pointer-clit" being light blue so that it is always looking soiled, that stupid e-mail button on the left side of the screen and one jacked up itty-bitty keyboard. But those are obviously pretty minor problems. It's a bit spensive and I would only recommend it for users like myself who frequent 3rd world countries and stay in tents with no AC power...

      P.S. - Small Pox suXors!!!!!

  19. apple by captainstupid · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's called a power book.

    Yao and mini-me use 'em, why can't you?

    --
    "Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling...." - Abraham Simpson
    1. Re:apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh "mini-me" isn't the dude's name, last I checked.

    2. Re:apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Verne Troyer who plays Mini-Me

    3. Re:apple by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Because the only fast one, the HUGE screen one that Mini-me is using, won't be available for at least another month.

      Oh and you'll need to take out a second mortgage to buy one. The original poster of the article wasn't looking for anything big anyway.

    4. Re:apple by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      The 12" is running an 867 and it's more than fast enough for day to day computing.

      I use an 800 iMac for Final Cut Pro.

    5. Re:apple by duff0097 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, your big twelve incher starts at $1800, that's pretty hefty. But then again I'm a cheap bastard that bought used. I would like to get into macs, but they are always too expensive. Except of course if they are used and/or 5+ yrs old. -Duff

    6. Re:apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called off-topic reply. Why can't moderators mod accordingly?

      Why assume his motivations & standards are just like your own ?

      He asked a specific question, you gave a typically useless Macintard reply. Now you and the other little pindicks go play with each other and leave the adults alone.

    7. Re:apple by dick980 · · Score: 1

      Because I don't get paid as much as Yao and Mini-Me.

    8. Re:apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because Yao is a communist

  20. www.aslab.com by wazo2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    aslab
    I'm currently buying linux servers from them, but I saw that they also have laptops

  21. HP is not the way by Papa+Legba · · Score: 5, Informative

    Called them today looking at laptops. Told her I did not want to pay for XP , she told me that removing it would void the waranty on the laptop! She suggested that I buy a bigger drive and do a split partion. I was disgusted that I Was going to be charged even more just to run linux. I am not even sure how software can void a hardware warranty. The call ended with them still having a laptop and me still looking.

    --
    Papa Legba come and open the gate
    1. Re:HP is not the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The call ended with them still having a laptop and me still looking.

      LOL. Nice phrase.

    2. Re:HP is not the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Ha! Talk about friggen arrogant, eh? I'm glad you said screw'em.

    3. Re:HP is not the way by blakestah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have an HP linux laptop. I blew away Windows NT about 3 years ago, and installed linux. It was light for the time (4 lbs), and had the right range of compromises I was looking for. But, HP laptops are, I think, just relabeled Dell laptops.

      Anyway, $0.02. HP is really oriented towards corporate sales and not personal sales, and it is dern near impossible trying to get decent specs from them. But, the machine has worked like a charm so far, and its been through a lot.

      Back to the original poster. If you want Firewire built in, you gotta buy a MAC or a SONY. If you won't pay for Windows, you will get a MAC. End of story. However, I dislike the SONY laptop keyboards, and the Macs run like crippled pigs (even if they look beautiful and have sweet user interfaces).

      I am not sure what I would get now. The built-in Firewire is much more limiting than you would think, due to licensing issues. In laptop use I have come to value battery life more and more, as well as a decent keyboard. I'd probably look at Crusoe powered laptops to get good battery life, and then look for one with a good keyboard.

    4. Re:HP is not the way by funaho · · Score: 1

      Hmm the Gateway 600 I'm typing this on has firewire and is obviously neither an Apple nor a Sony. :) Runs RedHat 8.0 just dandy too. Everything works except the internal winmodem, which I don't really miss anyway.

    5. Re:HP is not the way by CowardNeal · · Score: 0

      You're a bloody asshole and you know it. XP is always going to be part of the price, just pretend its not there.

    6. Re:HP is not the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems as if you forgot to ask the vital question of... how is it i void the waranty if i remove windows but it is okay to open the system up and remove the hd!

    7. Re:HP is not the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I have 3rd HP notebook and I love them for ergonomics. They do not support Linux but they
      told me that I can install what I want - they
      just do not support it and they may have problems
      with servicing it. But there was nothing
      about voiding warranty. toshiba was even worse
      since they told me they won't service unless
      the original OS is installed.

    8. Re:HP is not the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Dell Inspiron 8100 has a firewire port.

    9. Re:HP is not the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everything works except the internal winmodem

      You might want to take a look at the Tricks for Internal Modems in Linux Laptops at Mobilix if you haven't done so already.

    10. Re:HP is not the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      speaking as an HP tech support rep:
      call them back, I am sure that you may get the truth, which is, when you service an hp notebook, they will wipe out the harddrive and install the OS that was originally included with the unit, not unlike most others I imagine. This will be winXP or whatever OS and that cannot be avoided and paying for windows from the main retailer cannot be avoided by normal channels but at least you have hardware warranty as it applies. Hp has taken a stance that linux can break the notebook which is possible if you enable broken ACPI allowing the notebook to run without a thermal policy and thus without a fan or passive cooling control which will toast a unit. But this is probably what lead to the conclusion that HP voids warranties based on alternative software which is far from the truth. Hp doesnt care what OS you use and thier method of determining customer damage is quite relaxed.
      if you want my personal opinion (I just know you are waiting for another one), get an omnibook 500 or 6000 at ebay for under 1000$, the support for these is growing very quickly
      wont be long before linux supports stable docking/undocking, wireless disable/enable mode and volume/multimedia buttons
      as for the devices all work in linux except the 3com winmodem and speedstep on the processor (it uses a bx northbridge) but linux on this notebook is nearly completey support at least as far as options are concerned just dont listen to a rep without calling back or calling tech support (good chance you will get me). OS does NOT matter to HP.

    11. Re:HP is not the way by rearden · · Score: 1

      I was told the same thing by boh HP & Dell. However, I guess i was a little more upset. So, I called my HP rep and my Dell rep. Both of them told me the same thing and showed me the verbage in the warranty/ support agreement. Basically, what it works out to is you still have your warranty on your hardware, you just get no support. Also, if you make any changes to Firmware/ BIOS (Wireless Intersil chip Firmwares, BIOS rewrites, IEEE 1394 firware, etc) then your warranty is voided. However, the crux of the problem is that they ONLY provide the troubleshooting/ diagnostics software in Windows format. In fact if you downgrade to a lower version of Windows than they support they will not honor the suppport or warranty agreemen".

      What this works out to is that as long as nothing goes wrong that requires a diagnostics application you are ok and they will cover it. However, if they need to run diagnostics and or try firmware changes or systems checks if you can not run THEIR diag application they will not do a warranty swap... unless you get a very forgiving/ nice/ sympathetic customer support rep.

      So... what it works out to is they do not want to spend the money to re-write all of their apps for the many OS'es out there. Also, they do not want to train their "technical support people" how to read reports from a multitude of programs on different OSes.

      I can understand this to some degree as it would drive up cost and thus make their product less competive then other products out there. In the PC market that would be devastating seeing as how cost is often one of the few differentiators between products. What it works out to is that until the "others" do it each company has no reason to want to and a disincetive to offering warranty on Linux or other Non-windows OSes.

      Just my 2 cents.

      --
      Huh?
    12. Re:HP is not the way by Artemis · · Score: 1

      This Gateway 9300 PIII-450 was purchased in December of 1999 and it has working firewire, I don't understand how it is not included on all laptops now. It really shouldn't be a "feature" anymore, it should just be standard.

    13. Re:HP is not the way by scm · · Score: 1

      Fujitsu laptops also come with FireWire... Don't know if you can get them without Windows though.

    14. Re:HP is not the way by djb9751 · · Score: 1

      Try MicroPro - they let you buy a laptop without Microsoft software installed. All the hardware is compatible with linux except for the modem. Their webpage is www.micropro.com

  22. I-buddie - ECS by 2000+Britneys · · Score: 1

    here is the url http://www.ecs.com.tw/products/desknotes.htm?subme nu_id=15&function_id=12

    those seem to be sold without any OS and look like a decent notebooks - also there is quite a variety of them oferred for sale.

    Try www.computerboulevard.ca for some Canadian pricing.

    1. Re:I-buddie - ECS by symbols · · Score: 1

      ECS, I agree.

      http://www.ecsusa.com/products/green732.html

      As for the requirments. They are met with: 4 x USB 2.0, IEEE 1394A, 10/100 Base-T Ethernet, Built-in 802.11b wireless LAN antenna. Video will be done easy on a 15.0" XGA powered by ATI Mobility Radeon 8500 M9, AGP 4X, external 64MB DDR video memory. Battery is 2.5hrs @2.2GHz. Dimension & Weight 332 x 281 x 39.7mm / 44.7mm (13.07" x 10.81" x 1.56" / 1.76")
      About 8.6lbs / 3.4kgs

    2. Re:I-buddie - ECS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own one of these (A928 - 2GHz P4, 512M DDR), and it is a solid machine, but hardly a lightweight.

      It is sold as a portable desktop replacement, has no internal battery and no pcmcia slots. It does have modem, ethernet, firewire and usb 2 in-built.

      Great for power-users working off-site, and airport business lounges commonly have power outlets and phones available.

  23. I have an answer. by disconnectedsmile · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try http://www.powernotebooks.com I bought my laptop from there and am very pleased. I did not buy windows with it because they give you the option. It runs linux great and they have a wide selection to choose from. From light to mobile workstation. Check it out.

  24. Get an iBook by JjCale · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why don't you just buy an iBook. It seems to be your benchmark, so why isn't it suitable? Linux runs quite nicely on it and it has everything you have listed as a requirement.

    Am I missing something? It's hard to get a better laptop for the money.

    1. Re:Get an iBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last iBook I looked at that couldn't do as much as my pc laptop can do cost $300 more. I paid the damn MS tax, and I paid $3300 for my laptop with an extensive warranty that I've already had the misfortune of using. I bought a Dell Inspiron 8200 and I'm really happy with it. I told the sales rep straight out that I was going to remove Windows and install Linux, he just told me that everything was supported and if I had a problem I could return it. I really like what Apple is putting out lately, but it's not "hard to get a better laptop for the money," it's hard to get an equivalent iBook for the same amount of money. I'd recommend Dell, they have a small laptop that's somewhat expensive but they might be willing to drop the OS if you ask them. When the technician came out to replace my mobo, she was suprised to see Linux running on the laptop and commended me for doing so, not bitch about violating any warranty...iBooks are nice, but if you want affordability try to go with an x86 based laptop, it's so much cheaper.

    2. Re:Get an iBook by incripshin · · Score: 1
      Yeah, and if size is your issue, there's the 12". If that's too bulky for you, well, I don't think anything will ever please you ... aside from a PDA, but that's not really a laptop, is it?

      incripshin

    3. Re:get an ibook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forgot to add...even though it was stated that performance doesn't matter, the apples have VERY comparable performance with the p4ms when on battery power. and it lasts a lot longer as well.

      and i figure that the apples would kick the transmetas even though the battery life is not as good.

      i see an all-round solution for your specific problem (oh the delightful irony).

    4. Re:Get an iBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Linux runs quite nicely on it and it has everything you have listed as a requirement.

      The question really has to be, why would you want to run linux on it. You get all the good bits out of OS X. The only reason I would ever consider running linux would be on an x86 machine because you can use WINE... but then he's already said he doesn't want to.


      Bob

    5. Re:Get an iBook by afantee · · Score: 1

      >> The last iBook I looked at that couldn't do as much as my pc laptop can do cost $300 more.

      What the hell are you talking about? The iBook starts from $999 and comes with tons of features and software. So what exactly more could your $700 PC laptop do?

      >> I paid the damn MS tax, and I paid $3300 for my laptop with an extensive warranty that I've already had the misfortune of using.

      You are an idiot! For $3299, you can buy a 17" PowerBook with built-in AirPort Extreme (54 Mbps 802.11g), Bluetooth, Gigabit Ethernet, Firewire 800, FireFire 400, USB, 512 MB DDR333, 64 MB nVidia GeForce 440 Go, 60 GB Ultra ATA/100, DVD burning slot-load SuperDrive, not to mention all the free software. Where on earth can you get such a beauty from the Wintel world even if you are willing to pay more?

    6. Re:Get an iBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the geforce card is a problem if you want to run linux on that powerbook... there aren't any 3d-aware linux drivers for nvidia cards on the ppc architecture

  25. why not go with the iBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recently switched to a new 12 inch iBook running yellow dog linux, and I have to say its great. Although it may not be as portable some windows superslims, its battery life, and performance make it a superb choice. Also, i have had zero driver issues with my iBook, which is a lot more than I can say about install redhat on my old thinkpad.

    maybe you could find some usful info here too http://www.linux-laptop.net/

    1. Re:why not go with the iBook by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Just curious, why YDL? What are the advantages over OSX?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:why not go with the iBook by Door-opening+Fascist · · Score: 1

      I would imagine a prime reason would be that Yellow-Dog has less fluff and eye-candy than OS X, which would allow more efficient resource use.

      I would be curious to know whether the person got power management working on it.

  26. IBM X Series by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

    Just get an IBM X Series. I'm sure, but if you call them you miht be able to get a copy without Windows... if not "buy" Windows and then return it.

    I know they offered systems without Windows in the past, as I said if you call you might be able to get a special order.

  27. a slashdot orginal by kajoob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The guy who started the whole "windows refund" thing began the discussion right here on slashdot. LinuxMall's windows refund day site is down, but you can still find plenty of good info on Geoffrey's site and in the original slashdot article

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
  28. Good Used Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've bought from www.eritech.com before. The laptop they shipped was in great shape and has served my wife well for two years. The laptops ship without an OS.

    1. Re:Good Used Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you serviced your wife well for two years?

  29. iBook by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

    - No Windows Tax
    - Firewire and USB
    - 802.11b built in
    - Radeon 7500/32MB 1024x768 @ 24bpp
    - "the size of an ibook"
    - $999 for base model
    - Runs Linux PPC just fine

    1. Re:iBook by Back+in+Brown · · Score: 1

      But what about the Steve Jobs^H^H^H^H^H^H I mean Apple proprietary hardware tax?

    2. Re:iBook by Professor_Quail · · Score: 1

      Currently I'm looking at an iBook; however, they're a bit larger and heavier than I'd like.

      I know a lot of people comment without reading the articles -- but you didn't even read the summary! He clearly states that he's looking for something OTHER than a iBook!

    3. Re:iBook by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      oops ;> Hehe. Meh, if he thinks an ibook is too heavy, he should look at a zarus or something :>

    4. Re:iBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> But what about the Steve Jobs^H^H^H^H^H^H I mean Apple proprietary hardware tax?

      If you're going to use that tired old '^H' gag, you should at least get the number of backspaces right...

    5. Re:iBook by afantee · · Score: 1

      And others are still recommending 14" Dell. If 12" is too large for him, his choice is severely limited.

      But no, I don't think he has totally ruled out the iBook.

  30. Buy used. by ktakki · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since you've ruled out the iBook, I'd suggest that you look for a laptop that meets your requirements on the used market (eBay, local want ads, computer resellers, outlets that deal in refurbished and formerly leased equipment). Someone else will have already paid the Windows Tax for you, and the money you save will more than compensate for the time you'll have to spend scraping Windows off the hard drive and installing your operating system of choice.

    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
  31. Dell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I bought my Dell Inspiron 4000 a year and a half ago I complained (somewhat strongly) about not wanting to pay for an OS that I wasn't going to use...they ended up taking $50 off my order. I don't know if that was just an arbitrary discount to get me to shut up...but hey, better than nothing.

  32. X-Book laptops at AccessMicro by bastia · · Score: 1

    I've never tried them, and I don't even know whether they'd run linux, but I've seen "X-Book" laptops advertised at AccessMicro for under $1000 without an OS.

  33. want a cheap laptop? by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

    If you don't care about top level performance or good hardware, and would prefer to bitch instead about having to buy a copy of Windows, you could always look on ebay. Better yet, you could buy my old laptop. It's in great shape, and I'll toss a copy of linux on there for you. ;)

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  34. You could try X-Technology by jon_c · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've seen this laptop on half.com, it's one hell of a deal:

    P4 2.4Ghz/512mb DR/40GB/DVD/CDRW/USB 2.0/FireWire/56K/LAN/15" TFT for ~1200
    No OS, no brand name. I have no idea if they are good are not, but they look decent.

    -Jon

    --
    this is my sig.
  35. R505 by npietraniec · · Score: 1

    Well, I know it doesn't really help, but I've got an Vaio R505 (Windows came on it but it's running linux now)... and it runs Linux just fine after some tweaking. http://www.resistive.net/linux7.html

    1. Re:R505 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dear assmaster. Thank you for your insightful response. I will take this into consideration the next time I post to slashdot.

  36. probably not Windows-free by g4dget · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I seriously doubt that those machines are "Microsoft Free": Emperor Linux most likely doesn't have the purchasing power to force Sony and other vendors to sell them machines without Windows licenses. Most likely, all they do is erase the Windows partition for you.

    1. Re:probably not Windows-free by Landaras · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're right. As this page points out, their machines come with WinXP Home Edition from the OEM. They just happen to blow it away and ensure that all of the hardware works very well with Linux, and your choice of distro is installed for you out of the box. They also provide a year of tech support, hence the markup.

      Note: I have no problem with Emporer Linux's business model, and wish them success. However, I don't think they'll meet the submitter's requirement to never pay for Windows.

    2. Re:probably not Windows-free by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Sony and friends don't offer non-Windows laptops because IT WOULD COST THEM MONEY! This article is the biggest troll i've ever seen. In order to avoid "paying the Microsoft tax" you're just going to end up paying for someone to specifically take 1% of laptops off the production line before the Windows install, stock them somewhere marked differently from the generic (Windows) laptops, update their inventory database, notify their distibutors who will then have to notify the stores... all adding up to a hell of a lot more than it would cost them to just put Windows on it and say "reformat at home if you like". If you're that anal about not wanting to give Microsoft any money, perhaps you should look at starting a specifically non-Microsoft laptop company and see just how much business it'll get you. Note there are companies that sell "unbadged", "clean" laptops out there... catch is if you want to buy from them you're going to need to order in bulk just like Dell do.

      --
      I got a sig so you would remember me.
    3. Re:probably not Windows-free by mrPalomar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      hmmm. maybe the doj should investigate this. sounds like a lack of competition in that market. hope noone is wielding their monopoly power to stifle the market...

    4. Re:probably not Windows-free by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This article is the biggest troll i've ever seen. In order to avoid "paying the Microsoft tax" you're just going to end up paying for someone to specifically take 1% of laptops off the production line before the Windows install, stock them somewhere marked differently from the generic (Windows) laptops, update their inventory database, notify their distibutors who will then have to notify the stores... all adding up to a hell of a lot more than it would cost them to just put Windows on it and say "reformat at home if you like".

      You just very eloquently explained why calling it "the microsoft tax" is really not far from the truth. If it is really that hard to obtain a product in a particular market without sending 5% of the purchase price to a company in a different market, how can you call that anything but a tax?

    5. Re:probably not Windows-free by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 0
      You just very eloquently explained why calling it "the microsoft tax" is really not far from the truth.

      I wasn't making the point that it isn't a tax. I was making the point that it's not in Sony/Dell/HP/Compaq/Toshiba/Fujitsu's interests to bother stocking non-Windows laptops. Look at it this way. If i walk into 7-11 looking for Bovril, it would be ridiculous to complain that they don't have it. Hardly any of their customers want it, so it's not worth them stocking it. Most people will buy any home-brand stock or Vegemite. Hell, i can't even find it at Safeway (US). If i want Bovril i'm going to have to go to a British import store - or maybe even order it specially online - and pay three or four times as much. Them's the breaks.

      --
      I got a sig so you would remember me.
    6. Re:probably not Windows-free by bluephone · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that'll work. The Bush-administration DOJ relly kept the pressure on MS this last time 'round...

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    7. Re:probably not Windows-free by asreal · · Score: 1

      So then... how can we clear this up? Say you're buying a car. It comes with most of the stuff you want, but has a shit stereo and bad tires. There's no way around it. You could get someone to strip it out for you before you get the car, or you could just swallow the price and get the parts you want after the fact. But there's no room in Ford's business model to make one or two cars with the stereo or tires you want. Like the 'Microsoft Tax', you or someone else had to pay for a product you didn't really want.

    8. Re:probably not Windows-free by g4dget · · Score: 1
      In order to avoid "paying the Microsoft tax" you're just going to end up paying for someone to specifically take 1% of laptops off the production line

      None of that is necessary. Microsoft or Sony should simply reimburse me for the software portion of my purchase if I don't agree to the shrink-wrap license. Right now, the choice I get when I open the box and don't like the license is to pay the money and use the software or pay the money and don't use the software, and that's not fair.

    9. Re:probably not Windows-free by g4dget · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But there are about a dozen car manufacturers to choose from, and they usually have a handful of choices of stereos, from a dozen different vendors between them. Furthermore, if I buy a new stereo for the car, I can sell the old one.

      With Windows on laptops, I get no choice at all: Windows is it. And if I install Linux, I can't re-sell the OEM version of Windows.

    10. Re:probably not Windows-free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> If it is really that hard to obtain a product in a particular market without sending 5% of the purchase price to a company in a different market, how can you call that anything but a tax?

      Um... because taxes are collected by the government, not industry???

    11. Re:probably not Windows-free by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      > a shit stereo and bad tires.

      You probably can't do anything about the stereo... but if the tyres are bad enough to kill, you might have some bargaining power.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    12. Re:probably not Windows-free by ebyrob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was making the point that it's not in Sony/Dell/HP/Compaq/Toshiba/Fujitsu's interests to bother stocking non-Windows laptops.

      No kidding! I wouldn't want to tangle with Microsoft's legal department either!!

      As to the debate about people not wanting "naked" or "linux" PC's... There's enough that want them to make it worth the while, just look at the fancy shmancy "setup your own computer" website Dell has. How hard do you think it would be to slip in an option for "no windows thank you" under operating system? (they used to list NT and 2k under something just like that for an extra $100 or some such)

    13. Re:probably not Windows-free by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's simple economics. The fact that carrying a niche product (which Linux laptops are) is expensive has nothing to do with Microsoft's illegal monopoly protection.

    14. Re:probably not Windows-free by dubl-u · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sony and friends don't offer non-Windows laptops because IT WOULD COST THEM MONEY!

      Oh, please. Have you ever played will Dell's on-line configurator? If they can give you that many options, installing Windows or not is a piece of cake.

      Your rant makes more sense in a retail context. But even there, it would be pretty easy for any determined company to offer multiple OSes on the same hardware.

      How? At the factory, they put images for all the OSes on the hard drive. When you turn it on for the first time, it asks you what OS you want to run. If you pick the standard consumer choice, it says "ok" and carries on. If you pick one of the high-priced OSes, you give your credit card number via modem or human operator. And if you pick Linux, they give you a magic number that you fill in on a web site to get a refund. And then whatever you pick, the installer blows away the other OS images and gives you the space.

      So although there are many reasons a vendor might not offer Linux, the difficulty of keeping their build and stock processes straight shouldn't be one of them.

    15. Re:probably not Windows-free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> how can you call that anything but a tax?

      > Um... because taxes are collected by the government, not industry???

      The government is the industry (in the U.S. A.)

    16. Re:probably not Windows-free by Metrol · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, if I buy a new stereo for the car, I can sell the old one.

      Ya know, maybe not being able to sell the OEM version isn't such a bad thing. I mean, when was the last time you saw someone driving around a computer that said, "No operating system in chassis"?

      Might also explain the very rare occurance of computer jackings.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    17. Re:probably not Windows-free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Mexico they say, "If my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a bicycle." If I were buying a car, I wouldn't be posting to slashdot. Your analogy isn't illuminating. Let's move on.

    18. Re:probably not Windows-free by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would cost Sony very little to manufacture the laptops the same as any others, then if a customer orders one without Windows to stick in a special boot floppy that wipes the disk clean just before sale. Heck, they could even send you the Windows licence code in a sealed envelope along with the laptop, and if you choose not to pay for Windows they don't send you this piece of paper and the installed Windows version is useless. There is no reason why choosing not to have a particular OS should add any cost to the manufacturing process.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    19. Re:probably not Windows-free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wouldn't want to tangle with Microsoft's legal department either!!
      Errr... tango, as in the sexy dance :)
    20. Re:probably not Windows-free by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Sony and friends don't offer non-Windows laptops because IT WOULD COST THEM MONEY! This article is the biggest troll i've ever seen. In order to avoid "paying the Microsoft tax" you're just going to end up paying for someone to specifically take 1% of laptops off the production line before the Windows install, stock them somewhere marked differently from the generic (Windows) laptops, update their inventory database, notify their distibutors who will then have to notify the stores... all adding up to a hell of a lot more than it would cost them to just put Windows on it and say "reformat at home if you like"."

      This is why the article's submitter should look into an Apple notebook anyway. If the iBook is too large, then the 12" powerbook, although it does have heat issues. When buying this, you can be very sure that the money will be used to FIGHT microsoft as opposed to support it. And you can just load up Fink and Apple X11 which is enough for most people.

      I have owned an iBook for about one month now which is a first after 10 years of windows and nearly 20 years total of microsoft computing. I get a nice warm feeling inside knowing that I did not help fuel anti-competitive practices by paying for windows when I bought the notebook.

    21. Re:probably not Windows-free by lseltzer · · Score: 1

      It's called economies of scale. The hardware manufacturers can produce more cheaply because they have a common configuration. Like a poster above pointed out, making a no-OS system is a disruption to them and costs them money relative to making yet another WIndows system.

      Nobody's even mentioned the support cost. Selling you hardware brings with it a support obligation, and these companies are geared up to support Windows on their hardware. Supporting Linux is a complicated thing to do.

      The answer, if you want Linux notebooks to be cheaper, is for more people to want them. In fact, that it costs more proves that there is no significant demand. IBM used to push Linux Thinkpads on their site but dumped the effort due to lack of demand. It's the same with all the big companies. I don't doubt that they would offer Linux notebooks if they thought they could make money on them.

    22. Re:probably not Windows-free by rknop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wasn't making the point that it isn't a tax. I was making the point that it's not in Sony/Dell/HP/Compaq/Toshiba/Fujitsu's interests to bother stocking non-Windows laptops. Look at it this way. If i walk into 7-11 looking for Bovril, it would be ridiculous to complain that they don't have it. Hardly any of their customers want it, so it's not worth them stocking it.

      Terrible, useless analogy.

      Point 1: you can walk into a 7-11 and buy Dr. Pepper instead of Coke. If you could only get coke at a 7-11, then your analogoy might apply.

      Point 2: it's real easy to find another store with a wider selection of drinks. With laptops, unless you wan to buy the specialty Apple machines, you have almost no choice but to buy a Windows-laden machine.

      It's a monopoly. It's very sad that those of us who don't want to use Windows end up with little choice but to support Microsoft every time we purchase a laptop. We probably wouldn't mind so much if Microsoft weren't out there pushing proprietary standards and generally trying to do everything it can to make life difficult for the OS we do want to use. But they do; it's not just a matter of paying some money that goes to something we won't use, it's a matter of paying some money that goes to a company trying to ensure that we can't use our computers the way we want to.

      It's not just a gratuitous anal political statement, it's practicality; unless enough of us make this sort of political statement, we are in real danger of not being able to do what we want to do with computers.

      Myself, I've not been so good. I bought a use dlaptop, trying to justify to myself that well, I wasn't paying any more to Microsoft.... But that does nothing to support those few, hard-to-find types out there selling "naked" laptops.

      -Rob

    23. Re:probably not Windows-free by Spellbinder · · Score: 1
      sorry but i just can't see it....
      how are such machines assembled???
      my best guess is:
      at some point they will install windows and the other software on the harddisk and i think this will happen before they put the harddisk into the computers
      then they assamble the laptops put together all lose hardware ...
      at some time they will put all the parts in a box with software and everything included
      then the box will be labled ..(or it is labled before the packaging)
      if this is just somewhat near reality everything they had to change is:
      taking a clean harddisk to put into the laptop
      dont put the windows disc into the box
      make a new lable with no OS checkbox on it
      they almost always sell notebooks with different versions of windows... so nobody can tell me it is not possible to make a no windows option too.
      and as far as i am concerned it would be enough to sell this online if it is not popular enough for retail selling

      but maybe they have already payed for windows and would be losing money if they sell notebooks without windows

      --


      stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
    24. Re:probably not Windows-free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, please...

    25. Re:probably not Windows-free by Twister002 · · Score: 1

      It's almost like they want the laptop to be kosher or vegan.

      "They have to make my laptop separately from the other laptops and I don't want any M$ users to have participated in the assembly, they might have tainted it. OS-X users are OK, provided they don't have any M$ boxes at home and don't use any emulation software to run Windows programs."

      The best bet if you want to avoid paying the "Microsoft tax", is to buy a used computer or build it yourself.

      p.s. The iBook is too large?! Go hit the gym you pansey, get some exercise so you can manage to lug around that HUMONGOUS laptop that is the iBook. Maybe you can find a cell phone the size of a quarter to go with it.

      --
      "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
    26. Re:probably not Windows-free by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      You just bought a product which was very likely clearly labelled as to the contents... and now you're going to complain that it contains contents you don't want? Give it up!

      If you don't want to pay the price, don't. However, for full impact you might want to let the hardware company know why you're not buying their otherwise acceptable product-- in advance of the purchase. Complaining after you buy something is, well, ridiculous.

      Until there's a strong demand for Linux laptops, we're stuck with paying the tax or buying used systems (which still might come with MS on them, but at least we won't have directly contributed to the coffers in Redmond).

      --
      I do not have a signature
    27. Re:probably not Windows-free by tshak · · Score: 1

      Just like the Intel tax? Just because MS is dominent in the x86 market doesn't mean it's a tax (oh, and it's closer to 2% to anal - stop comparing the expensive shelf price of Windows). I don't know what beef this guy has with the iBook (or even better, the 12" powerbook). He's thinks it's too big?! The only reason that I wouldn't get an iBook is because they're too slow for me, but the powebook's are pretty speedy, smaller, built better than any PC laptop that I've seen (and I've been actively reviewing PC laptops) and priced pretty well.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    28. Re:probably not Windows-free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? Shouldn't you be allowed a refund for the software you won't ever use? Nobody ever said that in order to not buy Windows you must buy a specific model laptop. It should be simple to mail back your "recovery disk" and delete Windows from your laptop for a refund. Through strong-arming tactics, this perfectly reasonable option is not allowed. Hence the "Microsoft tax".

      Let me repeat myself: A separate product line should NOT be needed! (I say "should" because a lot of companies will be forced to pay much higher prices for Windows if they did this because of Microsoft extortion)

    29. Re:probably not Windows-free by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      The difference is that if I buy a PC with an AMD processor, Intel does NOT still get part of the sale. Microsoft still does when I buy a PC with Linux on it (in the case of a Viao, anyways). Yes, there are some vendors of true "OS-less" PCs and yes, there are vendors of PCs built with Linux or other alternate OSes from the get-go, but these are the exception, not the rule.

      Until there is significant consumer demand for Linux (or OpenBSD, FreeBSD, OS-less, whatever) PCs, the discounts the OEMs get for going along with the "per-CPU" Windows pricing will exceed the benefit of meeting the limited demand. Part of the problem is that these alternate OSes tend to appeal to a relatively tech-saavy user community; a community that isn't afraid to install their own OS. Thus, the OEMs and VARs do not see the market as being as large as it actually is. Even so, and being a Linux "partisan" myself, the market for Windows is still much larger. If for no reason other than the vast majority is ignorant of an alternative or, heresy! Doesn't need the alternative.

    30. Re:probably not Windows-free by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that this was actually done for a while... either with Win31 and Win95, or possibly Win31 or Win95 versus OS/2. Pick one, lose the rest at first boot. I bet it was great fun to ruin the floor model machines by picking the 'wrong' choice and explaining that the 'right' one wasn't available anymore to show.

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
    31. Re:probably not Windows-free by 6 · · Score: 1


      I haven't used an analog modem in five or six years. In fact I intend to never again use an analog modem and make sure I plan my travels such that I say only in business hotels that offer proper broad band.



      I am appalled that all laptops on the market come with built in modems. Why should I have to pay a tax to modem manufactures just to buy a laptop.




      Boycott manufactures that force us to pay the modem tax!!@


  37. Get 'em used by dagbrown · · Score: 1

    I got a really cute Toshiba Portege super-slim notebook. The guy at the used-computer store was almost reluctant to sell it to me in the first place--it didn't have an OS on the hard drive at all. I said, "Got a DOS floppy handy? Show me if it boots." He did indeed show me that it booted, and I said "Great, I'll take it." Got it home, and I had Linux running on it in no time.

    The thing is great--it weighs about three pounds, I've upgraded its hard drive to a beefier 30G so it has lots and lots of storage, and I can take it wherever I go.

  38. We recently had a thread like this in c.o.l.misc by Kiwi · · Score: 5, Informative
    We recently had a thread about this in comp.os.linux.misc. Basically, at this point, it is just about impossible to buy a notebook without the "Windows tax". Also, Linux has a harder time with some of the ultra-small notebooks; they use weird proprietary drivers which Linux does not support a lot of the time.

    For more information about Linux on laptops, go to the web page about Linux on laptops; help can be found in the Usenet newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc or comp.os.linux.hardware

    - Sam

    --

    The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

  39. Get an iBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get an iBook. They're awesome. Or a 12" PowerbBook.

  40. no-performance by lothlorien · · Score: 1, Funny

    anyone interested in starting a low-budget campaign for ignoring computer performance increases: lets do it togeather!

    --
    /wrld
  41. Think Powerbook by FreeHeel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Consider a PowerBook G4. The 12" model is even smaller and more powerful than the iBook. You can run LinuxPPC or YellowDog Linux on it too.

  42. hmmm by StandardDeviant · · Score: 5, Funny

    i don't know about linux compatibility, but it sounds like in terms of HARDWARE you're looking for something like Fujitsu P-series or so. Fujitsu P-Series page. it doesn't have firewire, but it has everything else you want. here's a page talking about putting linux (debian) on it i think i've seen firewire pcmcia cards, so that might be the solution. I don't know about getting it without windows, but that's the breaks... Like another poster said, not *everything* has to be a political statement. You could just video tape yourself burning or shitting on your windows CD in front of a linux flag or something. ;)

    1. Re:hmmm by belloc · · Score: 4, Funny

      You could just video tape yourself burning or shitting on your windows CD in front of a linux flag or something.

      Winner, Most Disturbing Image of the Day.

      --
      I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
    2. Re:hmmm by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but the Crusoes I've used really are dogs. I'd take a 400MHz PowerPC 750 over anything Transmeta offers.

      Benchmarks be damned, PPCs just FEEL snappier.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    3. Re:hmmm by kaphka · · Score: 1

      The P-2120 does have firewire, and I think the last few models did as well. And if it's any consolation, it doesn't come with a Windows CD. (Just a license.)

      --

      MSK

    4. Re:hmmm by moncyb · · Score: 1

      not *everything* has to be a political statement.

      I don't think the guy was trying to make a political statement. I think he just didn't want money stolen from him by a law breaking monopolist. If you're going to run Linux and not MS software, you shouldn't be forced to pay money to Microsoft.

    5. Re:hmmm by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      Actually, the P-series does have firewire (at least the 2000 series). I have a P-2046 (built in wifi, 800 mhz Crusoe, 256 meg RAM) which has been great for me. I'm running Gentoo Linux on it. It's definitely not the fastest computer I've ever used (my 1.6 ghz Athlon work computer is nice to go back to every once in a while), but it's not terrible, especially with the 2.5 kernels, which gave it a huge speed improvement (I'm guessing because I use the preemptible option).

      I get 10 hours of battery with the screen brightness up all the way (extended main battery and bay battery), and 15+ with it closed (playing MP3's, etc.).

      Everything works under Linux except for the modem. I called Fujitsu before purchasing trying to find a way out of the Windows Tax, but they refused. Since I dual-boot every once in a while, it wasn't a bit deal.

      If you do get one, get it from Laptopinc. While I didn't buy from them, I wish I had (they have a much better dead pixel policy than Fujitsu themselves, and I have one dead pixel). Also, a great site for info on these awesome machines is leog.net.

  43. Re:Knoppix. by inflex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Be prepared for a lot of sales people to go "Sorry, we cannot allow you to boot that CD".

    Kind of ironic that you're not permitted to 'test' the machine you're about to fork out several thousand dollars for.

    When I was last searching for a laptop I encountered this brick-wall mentality, consequently I ended up telling them "Oh, in that case, no sale, goodbye" ( Commissions obviously doesn't exist in sales any more ).

    As for the reasoning behind the no-fiddle mentality, it's because they're afraid that you'll install some sort of hacker software.

  44. This is not so hard, is it? by maxmg · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just because somebody mentions Linux, does that mean they can post an article and get a few thousand people doing their market research for them?

    Geez, buy a couple of magazines, go to some vendors websites, use Google and find out wether the box you want to buy has been successfully used with linux yet.

    On another note, I would like to clean up my garden using linux, anybody want to help?

    --
    I asked for a refund - and got my monkey back.
    1. Re:This is not so hard, is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless, of course, the answers are of benefit to other readers. Pretend it's a forum.

    2. Re:This is not so hard, is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon me, but would you keep the noise down here. I'm doing my market research by reading the helpful suggestions to the question that was asked.

    3. Re:This is not so hard, is it? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      On another note, I would like to clean up my garden using linux, anybody want to help?
      Are you mad Sir? Surely you know that the only OS which will properly support your leaf blower is Net BSD.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:This is not so hard, is it? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I already tried magazines and Google. I can't find any 12" or smaller PC laptops that don't come without Microsoft Windows. If you think it's so damn easy, post a link to someone selling one.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    5. Re:This is not so hard, is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no it is not easy, it is impossible. I bet you knew it already. that is why many people including me consider your post more of a political statement.

  45. buy used by tuj · · Score: 1

    Sony Vaio r505's are running pretty cheap, even with the docking station. You won't be directly paying for windows since its not a new machine.

    But some things (like paying for windows in the price of a new machine) you just have to live with. Afterall, many of us buy a car that has a stereo and speakers installed at the factory that we will immediately replace, but we don't insist that we are sold a car without them. Find a machine with the cheapest version of windows (XP Home probably) and cut your losses.

    1. Re:buy used by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Thats why you buy trucks that have a plain "radio-delete" option on the build sheet. If you are in the custom market, why pay for the upgraded model if you are rebuilding the car from scratch anyways.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    2. Re:buy used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad example. Manufacturers are required by law to provide a 'radio delete' option. The reason for passing this law was automobile manufacturers were trying to force radio manufacturers out of business. You didn't think those odd-ball dash cutouts were purely aesthetic decisions, did you?
      Which isn't to say the same thing happens in the software world (ooff!)

    3. Re:buy used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony Viao's are proprietary pains in the neck when it comes to repair.

      Our most recent run around with them at the laptop repair shop I work in required the client who owned the computer to send the machine back to Sony to do the repair on a broken latch on the front that allowed the machine to latch shut. Apparently they didn't allow anyone else but Sony to do the repairs on the machine. So far this type of "have the end user return the unit to Sony for repair, has happened multiple times last week alone.

      They are unfortunately fragile and for all of the ones I have seen have unpowered firewire ports.

      With this piece of information, one might be better off looking at something in the portable used range and pick up a PCCardBus Firewire card, such as the one from Adaptec, or numerous of the other manufacturers out there.

      As for personal thoughts I'd look at the 12" Powerbook. But if you're not going for the 12" iBook, the powerbook probably won't work either for what you desire.

  46. Go For The PowerBook by Xafloc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now this could probably be considered a switch story..but I still use Windows/Linux, so it's more that I have just added one more to the list.

    I recently acquired the last model of the PowerBook series. 15"/G4/1G RAM. I must say I am very impressed with the hardware, the size, the layout, etc. I'm still trying to get used to the Operating System.

    I do a lot of Java Development, and have gotten my favorite IDE to work (Eclipse), and have gotten JBoss to run semi-succesfully. There are a lot of things to get used to though. The built in mouse has but one button, so you must ctrl->click to do a right click...that is annoying as heck. So, purchase an external mouse whatever you do.

    being able to drop to the shell and be in a familiar place is very nice. Install Fink and you can apt-get your favorite software. There are a lot of apps out there...more than I thought there was (www.versiontracker.com).

    All in all...I'd say get a PowerBook and leave OS X on it, and install your favorite Open-source software.

    If you choose to wipe it clean and install a version of Linux...it is still very impressive hardware, so you should be in a win-win situation.

    My two cents...

    --
    -= Xafloc =-
    alinuxbox.com
    N
    1. Re:Go For The PowerBook by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      You might want to take a look at BBEdit, and see if it's useful to you - there's a demo at www.barebones.com. See how you like it compared to vim/emacs. Not affiliated with them, I just love the app and thought I'd share.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:Go For The PowerBook by MyHair · · Score: 3, Informative

      The built in mouse has but one button, so you must ctrl->click to do a right click...that is annoying as heck. So, purchase an external mouse whatever you do.

      The "mouse" is a touchpad, isn't it? Many PC touchpad drivers have a feature that tapping in the upper-right corner is a right click. Hasn't somebody made such a driver for Macs or for Linux on Mac?

      I don't own a Mac or Powerbook, but I wish I did.

    3. Re:Go For The PowerBook by Xafloc · · Score: 1

      I was unaware that there was such a thing out there. I'll dig around and see what I can find. It would be very helpful, as there are certain times/places where popping in an external mouse is not "possible".

      --
      -= Xafloc =-
      alinuxbox.com
      N
    4. Re:Go For The PowerBook by alienw · · Score: 1

      What's so impressive about the hardware? The processor is much slower than a PC one (don't tell me the architecture can compensate for a twofold difference in MHz, since it can't). The case is very nicely designed, that's true. However, the whole thing is very expensive. $2000 for a 12" notebook with an 866 MHz processor? Gimme a break. Unless you need a really small and light notebook (since that's the only category Apple offers), you might as well get a cheaper and faster PC-based one, with a bigger screen and better Linux support.

    5. Re:Go For The PowerBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      puh-leeze. Have you ever used VIM or emacs, realllllly used them? VIM rules, emacs is OK if you enjoy memorizing cryptic command-key combinations, and BBedit is for amatures who don't even know what a middle click is.

      grunt grunt wheeze

    6. Re:Go For The PowerBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're "twofold" difference in processor speeds is hardly realistic, and even less so in the case of laptops. A 1GHz G4 with a much smaller pipeline among other things (which DOES make it substancially faster than it's PC counterpart of the same speed). Additionally the Pentium IV laptops scale down to practically half the speed when on battery because they consume power far too quickly while the G4 can be set to scale down, but in OS X it isn't even really worth it because you don't gain all that much battery life anyway.

    7. Re:Go For The PowerBook by matt-fu · · Score: 1

      you should be in a win-win situation

      Funny how this is also a no-win situation. :)

  47. Neocomputers by charlie763 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Neocomputers.com will sell you a custom laptop. You can also purchase it without Windows on it.

    Here is a link to the custom laptop page.

    --
    Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
    1. Re:Neocomputers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just to note, i have purchased from neo-computers and the support was less than great. during the computer's warranty everything that could go wrong with the computer did and neo-computers did nothing to fix it, beware ;).

    2. Re:Neocomputers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said he wanted something smaller than an iBook, not a 15lb brick. BTW, I keep seeing that case design around (Sager, Alienware...). They are all buying from someone in Taiwan....

    3. Re:Neocomputers by ignantjim · · Score: 1

      I've used(and worked on) the sager notebooks. Granted, they were older models(3 years old), but they are really awful. When comparing a Sager model to something else from a respectable manufacturer like Sony or Apple, they simply don't compete. Regarding support, Sager did help me to find a cd-rom drive for one of their laptops, but I was a bit worried since it would appear that their entire support staff working the phones speak English as a second language. Had a little bit of trouble trying to communicate my needs...;) Summary: The Sager notebooks are bad and I won't buy one.

    4. Re:Neocomputers by DickieRay · · Score: 1

      The NP2720 at neocomputers.com is advertised as being light, though its listed weight is 7 lbs. Comparatively, that's not light.

  48. 800 x 600? Nooooo! by RabidOverYou · · Score: 2, Informative

    > I don't care about screen size so long as it can do 800x600.

    800x600? You can't be serious! The high end of 1991? I remember the rollout of 800x600, between VGA and 1024x768. Yes, there was some XGA nonsense in there, but we got to 1K pretty fast, and that's rock bottom ever since.

    Look, I'll admit the current pixel dance is sort of goofy, with 2Kx1920 or whatever, but 800x600? A reasonable low end is 1280x1024.

    Ob disclosure: my Dell Inspiron 8000 is 1600x1200, and yes those dots get a bit tiny sometimes. But I dig it.

  49. Are you a troll. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    With those requirements this could almost be a plant by Apple.

    If there's one place where Apple kicks ass (and I'm of the opinion there are more), it's in full-featured notebooks.

    Dude! You're getting an Apple!

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    1. Re:Are you a troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no, I'm NOT getting a piece-of-shit Apple. Apple can suck my dick. I won't settle for anything less than x86 (and NOT AMD's "version" of x86, either). Intel or bust!

    2. Re:Are you a troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wont have anything as low as x86
      I use Sparc64 on my pc and PPC on my notebooks (ie Apple) and would never go back to x86. Buy the apple!

    3. Re:Are you a troll. by metamatic · · Score: 1

      No, not trolling. While my desktop machine is a Mac, I work for IBM, and I would genuinely consider a Linux laptop if I could get one that was smaller than an iBook without having to pay money to Microsoft for software I don't want.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  50. Not completely same, but by lingqi · · Score: 1
    here is a notebook that rivals Apple's 12" I-book specs. All in a package less than 1kg. Now, the catch - you might have to deal with taking off windows, and you might not even be able to get in in the states - but try to find another notebook that rivals iBooks in design, weight, and battery life (5 hours or so) which would run linux. Life is full of compromises - forcing yourself to not buy windows on a notebook is going to cost you more headaches and time than it's worth, I think. After all - think of the extra 50-150 dollars as "convenience money" to give yourself more choices. After all your time is not free (to continue searching for your "dream notebook")

    then again, I vaguely remember Dell willing to provide computers without OS. not authoratative, though.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:Not completely same, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't they have an agreement with MS that they wouldn't ship boxes without an OS, and then proceed to ship em with a floppy install of some DOS clone as a way around it?

    2. Re:Not completely same, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup. with freedos. =P

  51. I'm confused. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand. It's ok to pay apple extra for the OS you're not going to use, but it's not ok to do the same when it's Microsoft? They're both souless, heartless corporations people. Bottom line for both of them is getting your money.

  52. m-tech laptops by gleam · · Score: 1

    http://www.mtechlaptops.com/

    They have a fairly wide range of laptops, all the hardware is supported by linux, and they will install with or without windows.

    i don't think you'll find much lighter/smaller than an ibook, though.

    -gleam

    --
    this .sig is not a .sig.
  53. Fujitsu Lifebook by g4dget · · Score: 3, Informative
    For my next notebook, I'm considering the Fujitsu Lifebook: they are very small and claim to have great battery life. If people have more experience with Linux on those, perhaps they can share it.

    There are also a number of 2-4 pound laptops from Dell, HP, Gateway, etc.; that's what I have right now. They are considerably lighter than the iBooks, have comparable or better battery life, and are much, much faster. They often don't include the CD/DVD in the main laptop, but frankly, I prefer that choice; it's easy to plug a bus-powered CD/DVD into the USB2 or FW port.

    You will effectively not find a notebook where you don't pay the Windows tax: the big manufacturers just bundle it that way, and if anything goes wrong with the machine, they will have you run stuff under Windows before even accepting it for warranty return (I have been there). Apple is no better: you can't get their HW without their OS, and they won't even support their laptops connecting to a non-Apple wireless access point.

    1. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by b17bmbr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      they won't even support their laptops connecting to a non-Apple wireless access point.

      oh really. i bought an ibook and called them up when i couldn't connect to my linksys WAP. the guy told me exactly what i needed to do. very helpful. if you want to bash apple, at least know wtf you're talking about.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    2. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 1

      If people have more experience with Linux on those, perhaps they can share it.

      I have a Fujitsu Lifebook 770TX (an older model laptop) on which I put Redhat 7.2. Here's what I was not able to get to work, and I attribute this more to my not necessarily needing these features long enough to try and make them work as opposed to lack of hardware support in Linux:

      • The built-in sound... although this laptop has a Soundblaster compatible card
      • The built-in modem. It is a WinModem, and there are some Linux drivers for it, but since I use 802.11b 99% of the time and a Linksys 10Mbps PC Card Ethernet adaptor 1% of the time, I didn't care.
      • An IBM USB camera... although the laptop knows it is plugged in, I can't seem to get it to work, but once again its not that important.

      With that in mind, I would consider that the most important and practical feature that I did get to work was support for wireless networking. I used Linux-Wlan-NG, along with a bit of tweaking to enable this laptop to run both Proxim and Linksys 802.11b cards. Aside from what I mentioned above, the laptop works quite well for pretty much all the work I do with it (mostly software development, various IM clients, web-surfing, and some word processing).

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    3. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by dieman · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Buy a lifebook. They rock. I can't think of life without the P2040.

      --
      -- dieman - Scott Dier
    4. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      won't even support their laptops connecting to a non-Apple wireless access point.

      This may be true, however I have no idea BECAUSE I'VE NEVER HAD ANY PROBLEMS connecting to a non-Apple AP.

    5. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by FueledByRamen · · Score: 1

      I can one-up you with a good Apple-support experience:
      I purchased a Powerbook Duo 270c (one of the last 68040-based laptops) and wanted to open it so I could do something to the modem - I don't remember exactly what it was, probably reseating it because it was shipped "roughly". Anyway, I couldn't figure out what was holding down the top panel. So, I called up Apple support (at least 3.5 _years_ after the model line had been discontinued, and I didn't even buy it from them - I got it from a Canadian reseller, with no warranty). The lady kindly walked me through the proceedure of disassembling the screen hinges and gave me pointers on how to lift the frame (which was necessary to get at the modem).

      I can see the equivalent experience with {Dell,HPaq,Gateway,Sony,...} support now... "You say you want to... take apart your computer... and poke around with the modem? I'll have to perform basic troubleshooting before I send a field tech. No, I'm sure it will fix the problem. Have you tried reinstalling the drivers?"

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    6. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by g4dget · · Score: 3, Informative
      very helpful. if you want to bash apple, at least know wtf you're talking about.

      I own two Macintoshes. One of them didn't work with my non-Apple AP. Everything else did (Windows, Linux). Apple tech support told me there was nothing they could do--"We don't support connecting to non-Apple 802.11b access points, it may or may not work. You could bring it in to a dealer that has an airport set up to see whether it's a hardware problem."

      Yes, Apple tech support is generally good and helpful. Their folks seem to be smarter than those at PC companies. But there are limits to what they support (and what they can support). And they will almost certainly not support Linux on an iBook either.

      So, if you want to bash me, at least know WTF you are talking about.

    7. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by g4dget · · Score: 1
      The built-in sound... although this laptop has a Soundblaster compatible card

      That's alway tricky.

      The built-in modem. It is a WinModem, and there are some Linux drivers for it, but since I use 802.11b 99% of the time and a Linksys 10Mbps PC Card Ethernet adaptor 1% of the time, I didn't care.

      WinModems are a lost cause, and they are dangerous (all sorts of weird voltages on some phone lines). Just get a PCMCIA card or a USB travel modem; if it breaks, you don't have to send in the laptop for repairs.

      An IBM USB camera... although the laptop knows it is plugged in, I can't seem to get it to work, but once again its not that important.

      If it shows up on the USB list of devices, the laptop is working fine; you are probably just missing the camera driver.

    8. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by g4dget · · Score: 1

      What kind of battery life are you getting on the P2040? Could you put up a page with the XF86Config file and other configuration information at http://www.linux-laptop.net/?

    9. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      Here's a link to an awesome Fujitsu P-series site, which has what you're looking for.

      I have the P-2046 (same as 2040 but with builtin wifi). With the extended main battery and bay battery, I get 10 hours at full brightness, and 15+ with it closed (MP3's etc.). Everything works under Linux (I run Gentoo) except the winmodem.

    10. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by TiMac · · Score: 1
      Welll...

      Apple tech support told me there was nothing they could do--"We don't support connecting to non-Apple 802.11b access points, it may or may not work. You could bring it in to a dealer that has an airport set up to see whether it's a hardware problem."

      If that's indeed what the tech told you...then he was probably a rookie and got his terminology wrong. Apple doesn't support connecting to non-WiFi-certified access points. Nor do they support using non-Airport CARDS. But believe me...Apple has no problem with you using a non-Airport Access point...why? Because a lot of their customers (think: education, business) have an established wireless network with another vendor....

      So don't go on the word of one tech. WiFi is the key.

      --

    11. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by jtdubs · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about?

      It's called IEEE 802.11b, or 802.11g in the case of the newest Apple laptops.

      The laptops connect, without any difficulty, to any WAP that supports those standards.

      My PowerBook G4 is currently connected to a "WAP", that is actually a D-Link wireless card in an old PC running OpenBSD 3.1. Before that we were using a LinkSys WAP with 128-bit WEP.

      Now, it could be true that apple won't give you phone support for connecting to non-Apple WAP's. I don't know; I've never tried. I find it unlikely though. Apple's tech-support has been fabulous to me during the years I've used them.

      Justin Dubs

    12. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by chyne · · Score: 1

      I totally recommend the Fujitsu P-Series! It's true that you have to pay the MS tax when you buy it, but it's usually cheaper than trying to find a laptop that is exempt from the MS tax. You have to ask yourself which is more important to you, saving money or defying Microsoft. I choose to pay, and instead use every chance I get to publicly denounce the greedy, untrustworthy, insecure, inconsiderate, non-consumer friendly buggers (various obsenities muttered under my breath as I type this).

      I'm glad I did buy the P-Series because I can no longer imagine life without it. It's got just about everything you could possibly need built-in. And everything but the modem works under linux (and I've even heard glimmers of hope about the modem). And I mean everything works, even the little application quick launch buttons. I get a good 5+ hours of mobile coding/hacking done with just the main battery, and 10+ hours with the optional bay battery. There are a lot of great sites out there on getting it working with various flavours of Linux, one of the best being http://www.greenfly.org/fujitsu/, which has links to a bunch of other great resources, including my page. =)

      All in all a great, small, lightweight laptop that gets ohs and ahs everywhere I go.

    13. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by g4dget · · Score: 1
      But believe me...Apple has no problem with you using a non-Airport Access point...

      Of course, they "don't have a problem" with it, they just don't provide support for those configurations. That meant that when my built-in WiFi card stopped connecting to a non-Apple AP, they said "there is nothing we can do to diagnose it, and, no, you can't send it in under your maintenance contract".

      why? Because a lot of their customers (think: education, business) have an established wireless network with another vendor....

      So do I, which is why I ran into this problem with Apple support in the first place. I eventually fixed it by exchanging one non-Apple AP with another.

      Whether Apple's policy reasonable or not is debatable. However, don't expect Apple to do anything for you or your hardware if you only run Linux on your iBook: their tech support will require that they talk you through diagnostic procecures under MacOS before they authorize you to send the iBook in.

    14. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by g4dget · · Score: 1
      What are you talking about?

      Read the other posting. Apple hardware "supports" 802.11b, but Apple technical support did not authorize return under my service contract when my Apple laptop stopped working with my non-Apple AP.

      The laptops connect, without any difficulty, to any WAP that supports those standards.

      That's why, when my Mac stopped working with my AP, the same AP that works with Linux and Windows, it looked like a hardware problem with the Mac.

      It's called IEEE 802.11b, or 802.11g

      There is no such standard as 802.11g yet--it's only a draft standard.

    15. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see the equivalent experience with {Dell,HPaq,Gateway,Sony,...} support now...

      Except you'll have to close your eyes to 'see' such a thing, as it's apparent you're an Apple Zealot and have been for some time. Why do you preach at people about things you have no experience with?

    16. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget about the part where they'll tell you to locate your Windows CD so that you can reformat the computer and reinstall the OS.

    17. Re:Fujitsu Lifebook by Aetrix · · Score: 1

      I've been running RH7.x on a Fujitsu Lifebook C-6535 for over 2.5 yr now. As a notebook, it's probably the best, most robust, well-featured notebook I've found. The battery life is excellent, and I've found that replacement/spare batteries ar $20-$50 cheaper than replacement/spare batteries for Gateway/Dell machines. The keyboard is EXCELLENT! Much better than the 15" powerbook keyboard or anything Gateway/Dell has to offer. The only thing I haven't been able to get to work in Linux is the cd-control buttons. I can get the application buttons to launch apps, but the cd player control is out of the question.

      Otherwise, I've got a 15" display, 10/100 ethernet, 2 usb, cdr/dvd, no firewire, but keep in mind this notebook is over 2.5yr old!

      If I wasn't going to get a 15" Powerbook to replace my Fujitsu, I'd be buying a Fujitsu again.

      --

      "One touch of Darwin makes the whole world kin." George Bernard Shaw
  54. HEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said it must be smaller than the iBook.

    Please do not post laptops with 15" screens...

  55. Notebooks are mass market items. by romanval · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Notebooks are different in that they tend to be all-in-one solutions, so they tend to include the OS whether you like it or not.

    The only way to assemble one is if there's a commodity hardware standard for notebooks or subnotebooks... but there's little chance of that happening since much of the size advantages of subnotebooks is a result of the tight intergration that an all-in-one solution affords.

    So you're pretty much stuck buying something OEM.

    Personally I can't see why you shy from an iBook. With an iBook, you're paying for Mac OS X anyways.. Although nothing is stopping you from installing Linux on it- once you give OS X a shot you'll probrobly won't need to.

  56. Windows Tax vs. Apple Tax by 1000101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, so I understand the whole Microsoft Tax idea, but I think the same thing could be said for Apple. Why purchase a Mac just to wipe out the drive and install Linux? The higher cost associated with Macs is partly contributed to Mac OS X. I have an XP box, a Red Hat box, and an iBook so I get my daily dose of multi-OS use, and I can't figure out why anyone would pay more money for an iBook just for the hardware. There are plenty of laptop manufacturers out there that provide just as high quality laptops as Apple. Soooo, back to my point: If you don't plan on using OS X, don't buy a Mac!

    1. Re:Windows Tax vs. Apple Tax by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Informative
      There are plenty of laptop manufacturers out there that provide just as high quality laptops as Apple.

      Except that oddly enough, when people compare the price of PC laptops to the price of Apple laptops, they almost invariably compare the lowest-priced PCs they can find to the Apple laptop.

      When you compare solid, reliable, long-lasting PC laptops to their Apple equivalents, the "Apple Tax" disappears. If you want to buy a cheap Dell and replace it in 18 months, that's fine, but if you want 3+ years out of your laptop, you'll have a tough time beating an Apple laptop for durability and reliability.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    2. Re:Windows Tax vs. Apple Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also try finding laptops with a 12" screen that have a decently powered 3d card...
      as a 3d developre that's important to me

    3. Re:Windows Tax vs. Apple Tax by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      Ok, so I understand the whole Microsoft Tax idea, but I think the same thing could be said for Apple. Why purchase a Mac just to wipe out the drive and install Linux? The higher cost associated with Macs is partly contributed to Mac OS X.

      It's a little different in that there is no incremental cost for Apple. (There's no incremental cost to Microsoft either, but some incremental cost to the OEM.) Yes, it cost money to develop OX X. And yes, hypothetically, iBooks would cost less if they didn't have to bear that cost. But if Apple sold computers without an OS, their market would be much smaller.


      On the one hand, the geeks benefit from the mass market for notebooks. On the other hand, the geeks have to go along with the mass market to reap the benefit.

      --
      -Dave
  57. they're smaller by simpl3x · · Score: 4, Insightful

    than the ibook, though i must say i've carried around my son's ibook, and it feels great sizewise. and, they are pretty darn reasonable now. of course, the advantage of booting into osx for itunes and such makes it an even better buy. the g4 powerbook is larger than some of the supersmall x86 machines, but how many of those have slot loading dvd recorders?

    1. Re:they're smaller by kirn_malinus · · Score: 1

      this one does ;) seriously, i'd tell this guy to keep looking at the Apple machines.

      --
      All circuits busy.
    2. Re:they're smaller by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      The problem with the iBooks is they're slow as hell with MacOSX on them. I saw some demo laptops and they took their sweet time loading ANYTHING. I guess their linux performance may be better, but for less money a Toshiba Satellite blows those machines out of the water in raw speed alone.

    3. Re:they're smaller by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Actually, iBooks do pretty well with OS X.

      I used to run OS X on a 1997 G3 tower day to day, and now that box is a web/file/MUSH server. Just throw some ram at the iBook. I've got a 400 G3 Powerbook here with 10.2.4 and it runs great.

      The white iBooks all run OS X well, but the AlPowerbook 12" will do better.

    4. Re:they're smaller by araemo · · Score: 1

      The problem with the iBooks is they're slow as hell with MacOSX on them. I saw some demo laptops and they took their sweet time loading ANYTHING. I guess their linux performance may be better, but for less money a Toshiba Satellite blows those machines out of the water in raw speed alone.

      It's probably the 4200 rpm hard drives. That'll kill ANYTHING's load time... IIRC, most 'high performance' pc laptops run at least 5200 rpm...

    5. Re:they're smaller by sesca · · Score: 1

      Just stick another 128MB of ram in it. MacOSX really needs to have at least 256MB otherwise it just crawls due to swapping. Nowadays ram is cheap enough that it really isn't a big deal to add. I did so with an iBook and it made a world of difference.

    6. Re:they're smaller by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      That may be the case, because the load time is probably what was holding it up. BTW the speed is 5400 for most other laptops.

      Seems like since the unofficial Death of SCSI at Apple, they haven't noticed that IDE hard drives are getting really fast and cheap.

    7. Re:they're smaller by jonjohnson · · Score: 1

      As they get faster, they get hotter. Since these are fanless machines, it has to remain decently cooled.

    8. Re:they're smaller by dspisak · · Score: 1

      You are wrong, most HD's in laptops are still 4200 rpm drives, this is usually a power/performance tradeoff that is made to help battery life in PC laptops due to how much juice the P4M chips use

    9. Re:they're smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since these are fanless machines, it has to remain decently cooled.

      The iBooks have fans. They don't turn on very often, though.

    10. Re:they're smaller by jchristopher · · Score: 1

      The iBook is still slow, even with 512 MB of RAM installed. Hell, for that matter, even the demo G4 towers at the Apple Store lag! Presumably Apple has their fastest, most impressive hardware on display, which is pretty depressing... sorry but OS X is STILL slow enough to drive me crazy.

    11. Re:they're smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, you show me an iBook with 512MB of RAM in it.

    12. Re:they're smaller by Halo1 · · Score: 1

      I've got an iBook 12"/800MHz and it runs OS X quite well (it's quite a bit faster than my old G4/400 desktop). It's true that the HD of the iBook isn't the fastest (I haven't really benchmarked it, but it seems like it's limited to something lik 20MB/sec read and 8-10MB/sec write speed), but that's not really due to the 4200 rpm speed: the Powerbooks also have 4200 rpm drives, but they're quite a bit faster (also faster that the previous generation's Powerbook drives, some of which did run at 5400 rpm). The reason is that the more expensive notebook drives have a higher data density, so they don't have to rotate as fast to get decent transfer speeds. Access time will still be slightly higher of course.

      --
      Donate free food here
    13. Re:they're smaller by Wansu · · Score: 1


      Err, you show me an iBook with 512MB of RAM in it.

      hunh? I got 640 Megs o' RAM in mine.

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    14. Re:they're smaller by mirko · · Score: 1
      It's probably the 4200 rpm hard drives. That'll kill ANYTHING's load time... IIRC, most 'high performance' pc laptops run at least 5200 rpm...
      I don't think so.
      Being a Cocoa coder, I'd say that the applications load the minimum of what they need and then perform load-on-demand for subsequent NIBs or other resources.
      Actually, you can optimize this but I'd advice whoever using MacOSX to:
      1. avoid to reboot it : they just happen to have a wonderfully stable system which also supports APM like you'd not even dream of.
        by not rebooting it, you'll allow the system to cache most of the stuff, thus making it fatser and faster.
      2. put as much RAM as possible : 640MB ought to be enough, though ;-)
      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    15. Re:they're smaller by afantee · · Score: 5, Informative

      >> I saw some demo laptops and they took their sweet time loading ANYTHING.

      You better shut up if your only experience with the iBook came from watching a demo. I am using OS X on a 700 MHz iBook for programming C++ and Java, browsing, playing music, editing graphics, etc, and it feels faster than a Sony Vaio with more than twice clock rate.

      The $999 iBook comes with a proper 3D card (ATI Radeon 7500) and 16 MB dedicated VRAM, while some of much more expensive Vaio models use cheap Intel integrated graphics with only shared VRAM. Personally, I wouldn't touch a Dell with a 10" pole, having known 3 people all had discovered serious problem with their Dell laptops within weeks of purchasing.

      While there are Wintel laptops lighter than the iBook, none has longer battery life and full features. Another huge advantage of the Apple portables is that they all come free with much more best-of-class software than any of the Windows or Linux machines: iPhotos, iMovies, iTunes, iCal, iSync, iChat, and so on.

      If you are a programmer and loves play with Unix and open standards, you simply can't get a better deal than Mac OS X. For instance, OS X comes with gcc 3.1 enhanced by Apple to handle Objective C / C++ on top of standard C / C++, and there are dozens of other tools that allow you to write and debug native Carbon, Cocoa, QuickTime, OpenGL, or terminal applications. Many popular open source applications (such as Perl, Ruby, Apatche, X11) are preloaded, and others (like MySql, PostgreSQL) can be downloaded and installed with a few mouse clicks. Project Builder and Interface Builder are free and much more powerful than tools on any other Unix platforms including Linux. In contrast, MS Visual Studio.NET costs up to $3000.

    16. Re:they're smaller by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Well, hell. I have Office 2000 installed on my Toshiba T2105 laptop. That's a 486DX-2 50 machine. It works 'plenty well' too. For the limited things I need Office on a laptop for.

      However, I'm not gonna claim there aren't some serious compromises. And I'm not going to claim it isn't slow as molasses, either.

      So be honest. 'Good enough' is what you meant, not 'fast'. Correct?

    17. Re:they're smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      much more best-of-class software than any of the Windows or Linux machines: iPhotos, iMovies, iTunes, iCal, iSync, iChat, and so on.


      And iButtplug?

      I am sorry. This is Slashdot. Quit fucking regurgitating Apple marketing shit here. We don't put up with it from Microsoft Zealots, and we don't need it from people who advocate closed source Hardware products either.

    18. Re:they're smaller by rf600r · · Score: 1

      No.

      It's backside cache. This is why an 800Mhz PowerBook seems so much faster than an 800Mhz iMac with the same processor and a faster HD.

      There. Now back to the original discussion.

    19. Re:they're smaller by Halo1 · · Score: 1

      Backside cache does not increase the speed of a hard drive at all. Backside cache sits between main memory and the cpu, not between the HD and main memory. You're right it does a lot for the overall system speed (since the processor has to wait less for new data to arrive from main memory), but it doesn't make the hard drive any faster (e.g. duplicating a file or swapping won't be sped up significantly).

      --
      Donate free food here
    20. Re:they're smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was about to ask the grandparent post if they worked for Apple, going around to on-the-fence computer sites and leaving pro-Apple comments.

      It annoys me to no end that all of the software packages are all named in this fashion:

      lowercase letter 'i' + properly punctuated relevant word.

      I liked the earlier Mac OS9 because it didn't seem like it was meant for the OSX Hippies in Starbucks.

    21. Re:they're smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've already have decided to hate Macs because it'll make me look l33t, even though I've never actually used one. Oh look, there's one now. I'll find a way to rationalize my feelings with a superficial judgement based on a snap decision."

    22. Re:they're smaller by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      I've got the same iBook and after I bumped up the RAM ($80 512MB pc-133 SO-DIMM from Data Memory Systems) stuff worked a LOT better. 128-256 megs is just not enough memory to run OS X. 640 megs though works pretty good for anything I throw at it. Sure, load times are a little slow, but it's a laptop! Load times were slow on my PIII-600 Dell Inspiron 4000 as well, but the hard drive in that sounds like a table saw.

      The iBook on the other hand is always virtually silent. I have to put my ear up to it to see if anything is running and even then it's hard to hear. Once in a great while the little cooling fan in it may come on if I do a lot of heavy CPU work but even that is quieter than my Dell was all the time.

      If you want a nice affordable little native UNIX laptop then the iBook is a nice value. My only regret is I bought the $1299 12"/800Mhz one in October and now they have 12" Powerbooks for about $400 more. I would've definitely gone for the Powerbook just to get the G4 processor if I had the choice. Oh well, maybe it's time to trade up and give my wife this iBook. ;-)

    23. Re:they're smaller by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

      I have a 500mhz ibook and 10 is slow as hell. 9.2 is pretty fast though and I prefer it more than 10. I have Suse 8 on my old Dell D300 and it's fast. I'll get a regular laptop pc eventually and throw Linux on it. The ibook is a pretty nice machine, the only one IMHO worth getting if you want to try a Mac. It'll probably the only Mac I buy.

    24. Re:they're smaller by grimmfarmer · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about the 500MHz "ice" iBook (circa late 2001), I'd have to temper my agreement with this: it is slow at DRAWING 10(.2.4), even with the maximum RAM (640MB) installed. It's only got an 8MB video card, and the all the antialiasing and transparency that OS X wants to do by default makes it appear really slow. I love my little iBook: take it everywhere (I'm a consultant administering four heterogeneous networks and two small Linux server farms) and do everything with it (snapshot whole PC HDs via FireWire -- raise your hand if your PC can reciprocate). My G4/867 certainly runs proc-intensive tasks faster, but also draws everything more snappily. Try turning off window transparency (app-by-app, I'm afraid) on your iBook and see if that doesn't make it a little more responsive -- did for me.

    25. Re:they're smaller by mog · · Score: 1

      I have to say, I really doubt that. Perhaps the demo was just poor, or something. My desktop at home is a PowerMac 8500, upgraded to a g3. That's 400Mhz, with a very poor 50Mhz bus. I run OSX on it and while, primarily due to the low bus speed, it does run sluggish - even on that machine OSX is not really all that slow. I seriously doubt that a 700Mhz machine with a 100Mhz bus is going to be anything but snappy.

    26. Re:they're smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would respectfully disagree with your statement regarding running OSX on an iBOOK.

      I am very happy with performance from a 600MHz iBook. The recent updates to "jagwire" have made ALL the difference.

      Combo drive, airport, clear screen, simplified networking and printer sharing, etc.

      I even run Virtual PC for a DAT prep guide and an organic chem modeling software. use winXP with the graphics turned down to minimal, and with the recent updates even this is OK for limited use - it flies on my dual 800 Powermac desktop....

      what iBook configuration - including software - are you talking about...

      ps...the more recent iBooks with larger L2 caches, and 32 MB video cards are beautiful...and starting at $999 what more could you really want?

      Small, great keyboard, great screens, quality in the details...

    27. Re:they're smaller by Wonko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While there are Wintel laptops lighter than the iBook, none has longer battery life and full features.

      I think I'm going to have to disagree with you there. I've got a Fujitsu Lifebook P-2120, with the double size main battery, and the second bay battery. Their website has a bunch of claims about battery life, but I'm not going to quote any of them. Under my average use at work, I power up my laptop in the morning, use it throughout the day(checking email, writing code, doing sysadmin type stuff), and then I take it home, and it still has a few hours worth of juice before I put it on the charger at night.

      That's probably over 10 hours of on time. I've never run the batteries down hitting it as hard as I can, but I've watched the ACPI numbers witht he hard drive going and cpu maxed, and it should easily clear 6-7 hours running like that. But I don't tend to use it like that, so it really doesn't matter.

      Anywho, this laptop should meet all the needs of the guy who asked the question(usb, firewire, 802.11b, ethernet)... If he doesn't want to send any money to microsoft, that'll have to be his problem though. And if it's not small enough, fujitsu has the P1000 series that sounds alot smaller, but can't pack as much battery, or memory.

      I am running Debian on this thing, and all the integrated hardware works, except for the modem. I haven't even tried getting the modem to work, since I've got no plans on ever using it. All I know is that this laptop is by far the most useful laptop I've ever had. It has a 933 Crusoe chip, and I haven't benchmarked it, but this definately feels snappier than my old P3 700 laptop, and doesn't get NEARLY as hot to the touch. It was well worth every penny to me.

      Wonko

    28. Re:they're smaller by afantee · · Score: 1

      But this is much more expensive than the iBook. And with 8 MB VRAM and max 384 MB SDRAM, it might be alright for checking email or writing simple scripts, but I wouldn't consider it a full featured laptop. Plus, I presume the Crusoe chip is no match for the G3 either.

      For $100 more, you can get the much more powerful 12" G4 PowerBook with built-in Bluetooth, 802.11g ready, 32 MB VRAM and max 640 MB DDR RAM.

    29. Re:they're smaller by afantee · · Score: 1

      And of course, the Lifebook doesn't run the sexiest Unix in the Universe or comes with any useful software.

    30. Re:they're smaller by euxneks · · Score: 1

      In contrast, MS Visual Studio.NET costs up to $3000

      That's funny, because as a computer science student at my university, I can get .net studio absolutely FREE. Full edition, no pirating.. It's some sort of deal Microsoft worked out with my CSc dep't... That doesn't mean that you shouldn't buy an iBook or PowerMac though...

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    31. Re:they're smaller by afantee · · Score: 1

      That's because you are a student and you can't use it for any comercial purpose. In any case, why would you want waste your time to learn something that doesn't work on anything other than Windows, instead of using industry standard like Java or C++ that plays well on all platforms?

      As a programmer myself, I have little respect for MS and most of its technologies. For some reason, the richest company in the world is simply incapable of innovations, styles or decent behavior. They either copy others or introduce incompatability into existing standards.

    32. Re:they're smaller by jchristopher · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I mean 512 extra, which would total 640.

    33. Re:they're smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ps...the more recent iBooks with larger L2 caches, and 32 MB video cards are beautiful...and starting at $999 what more could you really want?

      A real computer? Seriously dude, it's 2003, paying $1000 for a 700MHz G3, is paying top dollar for 1998 hardware.

      Personally I enjoy advancing technology, I see no reason to buy a new machine and not enjoy modern advancements in speed and power. If 700Mhz is all you need, buy a used 500 or 400 and your meagar "it's good enough" mobil needs can be met.

      Use a 2.0 for a month THEN go back to that lowly 700Mhz iBook, you'll feel like you're back in the computing 90's.

      Add $200 (now at 1200 total) for VPC and the honor of running Windows slower than fuck, else 100o's of software titles are no good to you.

      I can't understand why on earth anyone would buy an apple laptop.

      It seems like such a waste of money to buy a late 1990's powered notebook when much more powerful options are available for less money. After using a 2ghz laptop with real DDR and a faster FSB, I'd go nuts on a slower computer. Speed spoils, and I'm definately spoiled.

  58. Powerbook 12" by Hagmonk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These are a stunning laptop. I love mine. Only criticism is that it gets hot. They're small, light, firewire, 2x USB, DVD burner, good battery life, monitor spanning support, built in ethernet and modem ... the list goes on.

    The catch is always software. With Mac OS X, you get great software. Better by far than any Linux configuration on the desktop. Want to burn a CD? Insert the bank CD, drag the files onto it, and then eject it ("do you wish to burn this CD?")

    How easy is that? I don't have time to fsck around with cdrecord and mkisofs anymore. I just want to burn a goddamned CD. I just want to connect to a wireless network. I just want to watch a DVD. I just want to fire up emacs and write some code. I don't want to tinker and stuff around all day making things work.

    So remember, hardware is half the story. Software is the other. If you can take the mac premium price, you get the best of both worlds.

    --
    Ash OS durbatulk, ash OS gimbatul, ash OS thrakatulk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul! Uzg-MS-ishi amal fauthut burgulli.
    1. Re:Powerbook 12" by carpe_noctem · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only criticism is that it gets hot.

      Tell that to the guy that burned his penis.

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    2. Re:Powerbook 12" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better by far than any Linux configuration on the desktop.

      HEATHEN!

      My windowmaker/debian desktop blows mac os x out of the water any day. Just because you refuse to read man iwconfig and build your own kernel modules doesn't mean linux sucks. You are no longer a software user, merely a consumer. Your life is now meaningless. Flame off.

    3. Re:Powerbook 12" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe. You're cute.

    4. Re:Powerbook 12" by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      I've found that you can keep them cooler by turning on CPU cycling and CPU slowdown in advanced energy settings. I don't notice much performance difference, as the machine is 98% idle most of the time anyway.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    5. Re:Powerbook 12" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it an x86?

    6. Re:Powerbook 12" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems a little late for that, doesn't it?

    7. Re:Powerbook 12" by blowhole · · Score: 1

      Only criticism is that it gets hot.

      Tell that to the guy that burned his penis.


      i would if only he would put some darn pants on first!

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
    8. Re:Powerbook 12" by _Splat · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was a Dell...and he "didn't notice the warm feeling until it was too late"

      --
      -Splat
    9. Re:Powerbook 12" by gpoul · · Score: 1

      Right... Must be the first "consumer" running emacs on a PowerBook.

      Since when was emacs a consumer product? I guess even Richard Stallman would be stunned about this statement :-)))

      oh... and why again is life with emacs meaningless again?

    10. Re:Powerbook 12" by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

      That was a Dell...and he "didn't notice the warm feeling until it was too late"

      Dude, you're gettin a ... ..um ...damn, I'm sure there's a joke in there somewhere.

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    11. Re:Powerbook 12" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have time to fsck around with cdrecord and mkisofs anymore.

      Nor do I. That's why I use xcdroast.

    12. Re:Powerbook 12" by Fzz · · Score: 1
      I agree completely - it's a wonderful machine. I've used Unix on my desktop for the past 18 years, and this is the first machine that's ever made me seriously consider switching my desktop platform.

      Yes, it gets warm. But mine's been powered up continuously for the past four days, and it's still within reasonable bounds. It's warmer than I'd ideally like, but not warm enough to be a serious issue.

      - Fzz

    13. Re:Powerbook 12" by asjo · · Score: 1

      > I just want to fire up emacs and write some code.

      Where did you find a good emacs for MacOS X?

    14. Re:Powerbook 12" by Hagmonk · · Score: 1

      Google, my friend.

      http://www.porkrind.org/emacs/

      What's more, it's in a nice packaged installer format. Wonderful. I love having the little Gnu icon on my dock :)

      --
      Ash OS durbatulk, ash OS gimbatul, ash OS thrakatulk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul! Uzg-MS-ishi amal fauthut burgulli.
  59. do the ibook! by maxphunk · · Score: 1

    #rant_start
    ive had an ibook for a year now and i love it! it comes with a *nix at "no" extra cost... BUT it runs linux great. ive got slackintosh running on mine with no problems. x windows, check. mozilla, check. power management, check. cd burner, check. dvd player, check. wireless, check. apple's kick-ass warranty, check. now, in your position id go with the new 12" powerbook. same size, but with a neato aluminum case AND a g4... heck its also got a 32meg geforce4, not bad for a laptop. but if your looking for price, you really cant beat an ibook.
    #rant_end

    --

    "The chief enemy of creativity is 'good taste'" -Pablo Picasso
  60. DELL Inspiron with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I bought a Dell Inspiron and finally got a Linux refund($125) but it took me hours on the phone and educating them. Two of my friends have also bought Inspirons lately and got their refunds with less hassle so things seem to be changing. However, when you call Dell the first time you probably still get a confident "no" from several people until you get to the right person -- just call back, talk to someone else, and be persistent until you succeed.

    1. Re:DELL Inspiron with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could you post more specific info ?
      I intend to buy a laptop from dell and either get them to sell it to me without windows or get a refund.
      Being able to cite your case and give references to the people at dell that gave you the refund would be helpful indeed.
      (instead of 'an anonymous guy posted that he got a refund from someone'...)

    2. Re:DELL Inspiron with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      He did say that he wanted a small, light and cheap laptop. He didnt say he wanted a reasonably cheap, plastic, heavy and big.

      DELL does not make good laptops. They are often poweful but thats it.

  61. i went with ibm by bmwm3nut · · Score: 1

    i don't think you can get an ibm without windows, but you may be able to make up for it other ways. i had a dell ispiron 8000 laptop that i hated, some of the keys broke in less than a year and the display hinge got loose real quick and the display wouldn't stay up unless it was perpendicular. so anyway, last week i just got my ibm thinkpad r32. it's nice and light. the screen does max 1024x768 which is kinda small for me, but that's what you get with a small light laptop. now back to the windows problem...the oem xp licence on the thinkpad is $90 and there was no way i could convince ibm to sell me the laptop without it. but i did get a 10% student discount which more than covered the $90. now i know my money still went to the evil empire, but i did get a kick ass laptop. now, i am actually a graduate student, so that's why i asked for the student discount. but i had to do no verification at all. when i called the customer service, i told them i wanted a laptop and that i was a student and they gave me a 10% discount with no questions asked. you could always do the same (even if you're not a student) and you'd make up more than the difference that you'd pay for xp.

    btw - redhat 8.0 installed on the laptop with no issues at all.

    1. Re:i went with ibm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like you make it hard on those of us who really are students. Thanks man.

    2. Re:i went with ibm by Hero+Zzyzzx · · Score: 1

      Yes. Students make it hard on students. Read the post again.

    3. Re:i went with ibm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, IBM makes some good notebooks. I've thought about switching to apple in the past but I can't do without the trackpoint. The trackpad is just too hard for me to use. I got a good laugh when I went to a linux install fest and the other notebook users were using external mice.

    4. Re:i went with ibm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when IBM notices that suddenly, 90% of the people buying their laptops are "students", do you think they'll continue the deal?

      I'm a student too, I very much appreciate companies that give discounts. But students telling non-students to take advantage of benefits intended for students - when increased use of those benefits may change the provider's mind - does seem a bit odd. And yes, that does make it hard on students.

  62. Re:teehee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot.

  63. Couple links... by gregfortune · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might contact a Micron PC sales rep and see if they'll provide a laptop with a version of Linux installed. If I remember correctly, I was able to arrange such a deal for a client... I don't see any option on their website so I might just be crazy :)

    You might also take a look at Los Alamos Computers. They aren't as light as you want, but they might be an option.

    QLI is also an option, but weight is an issue again.

    Finally, Emperor Linux has some very light looking machines :) They are as light as 2 lbs, but you'll have to sacrifice a little speed. (2lbs is around 1 kg..)

    Good luck.. I don't have any experience with any of these companies except for Micron PC.. You might do a quick search on google next time...

  64. exactly what you need by 56ksucks · · Score: 0

    This is exactly what you need. http://www.actonlinestore.com/smoreinfo.asp?iid=14 22

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

  65. too picky by VS1 · · Score: 1

    dont you think your being too picky about this? it can never have windows installed on it..you just killed about any chance you had finding a notebook that fits those specs.

    Perhaps when your a little more accepting of Linuxs place in the notebook/laptop industry, youll understand which notebook/laptop you can purchase.

    --
    "Humanize war? You might as talk about humanizing hell!" -- British Admiral Jacky Fisher
    1. Re:too picky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think thats too picky, I think that paying for windows is bs.. I haven't used windows software in 3 years, and don't plan to start now! I also believe that it is anti competitive behaviour and it sucks! Its amazing how the big companies won't sell you Laptops without windows though, as IBM and HP, among others, spend an immense amount of money on Linux, and the last Ibm announcement I went to (re latest I-series server) they seemed to be spending more time on plugging Linux than their server.. but anyway.. I got a Imac, and am happy!

  66. windows? by rnd() · · Score: 1
    You won't buy Windows, but you would buy MacOS on your iBook?


    If you just want a good laptop, buy a Dell. They are relatively rugged, and there are lots of interchangable parts that work across models, etc.

    If you receive a copy of Windows that you don't want, use it as a coaster or donate it to the Wine project or something. You'll be worse-off buying some no-name laptop just to avoid the included copy of Windows.

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

    1. Re:windows? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. Where is the thread where we rant about how Apple won't sell an iBook without MacOS bundled?

      I am not going to use MacOS. Why should I pay for something I am not going to use? It should cost LESS without MacOS installed on it.

      Also, someone please fork off the SparcBook rant, okay?

    2. Re:windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is the most disingenious argument I've seen.

      Paying for OS X on a Mac is no that same as buying Windows on a PC. The money to fund the development is generated by an aggregate of the sales of all of Apple's hardware. There is no third-party vendor involved, there is no per-unit charge for the OS, and there is no specific profit for the OS.

      If you want to compare trying to get a discount on a Mac for not buying OS X to anything you should compare it to getting a discount on a Dell for not getting any warranty. Or, compare it to buying a new Sun without Solaris.

    3. Re:windows? by rnd() · · Score: 1

      No, it's exactly the same thing. Apple outsources its hardware production but brands it as Apple hardware. Microsoft outsources its hardware production but allows 3rd party companies (such as Dell) to brand it as their own. (Apple insists on using some non-commodity hardware as a non-standards-compliant way of clinging to market share)

      The economies of scale are the same for both Apple and Microsoft.

      If Microsoft didn't get Dell to agree to ship a copy of Windows with every PC, then Dell's customers would on average pay more for a copy of Windows and the total cost of owning a Dell would be greater. The "per unit" charge for MacOS is just not shown to the customer. This doesn't mean it is free.

      MacOS X lists for $129. Does this mean you can buy a Mac for list - $129 without the OS?

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  67. I smell a rat by Papa+Legba · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here is something odd. As people have been posting links I have been eagerly following them. I am noticing a disturbing trend. Every link has led to a place that had laptops on average $500 to $1000 more than the same laptop from a major vendor with windows on it. I am starting to think that we linux lovers may be taking it up the butt the same way that vegetarians get reamed for "Organic" produce..
    See a market , exploit that market and I think we may being exploited here.

    --
    Papa Legba come and open the gate
    1. Re:I smell a rat by Landaras · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I don't think we're being exploited by a markup, as long as the vendor provides the following:
      • Your preferred distro installed and fully tested. I would expect all hardware to work as well or better than it would under Windows
      • Popular software (possibly some non-gratis stuff like StarOffice or Loki game ports thrown in) installed and configured. Even automated installs can take time, and fixing dependencies can be a pain in the rear
      • Professional tech support on par with the major Wintel OEMs

      You don't always get that by buying a notebook off the shelf and installing Linux yourself. For some people and/or businesses, it might be worth the markup to receive the hardware and know that it's already set up, everything works, and help is just a phone call away.
    2. Re:I smell a rat by MarcQuadra · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's evidence that the system has broken down. It costs more to buy a product WITHOUT the monopoly OS than with it. You have to pay a premium to get a machine with Linux (a free OS) or no OS at all. The ill effects of a monopoly are starting to really show through now, and we're all just sitting here TAKING it and SUPPORTING it with every x86 PC purchase.

      I'm moving to PPC/Linux.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    3. Re:I smell a rat by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      Here is something odd. As people have been posting links I have been eagerly following them. I am noticing a disturbing trend. Every link has led to a place that had laptops on average $500 to $1000 more than the same laptop from a major vendor with windows on it.

      It's not odd at all.. The major manufacturers make money by selling large quantities with low margins. They put Windows on there because that's what >90% of the people buying systems want. The smaller companies selling custom setups or Linux installations don't do nearly the volume, so they need to have higher margins. Yes, there's a "Windows Tax", but it's more than offset by using a mass-produced configuration. If you're more interested in saving money than you are in making sure that Microsoft doesn't get your $50, you're probably better off licensing Windows and wiping the hard drive.

    4. Re:I smell a rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that's a sign of things necessarily broken down. Economies of scale favor the most common configuration. Like say you wanted to order a new car without any lining on the ceiling. You're probably the only one who'd want that, so it would cost considerably more to manufacture and deliver such a configuration, even though it should theoretically be cheaper.

    5. Re:I smell a rat by EchoMirage · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I am starting to think that we linux lovers may be taking it up the butt the same way that vegetarians get reamed for "Organic" produce.. See a market , exploit that market and I think we may being exploited here.

      I hope this wasn't an epiphany to you.

      Linux zealousy and vegetarianism/veganism are both just forms of snobbery for overly wealthy people to throw money at in hopes of appearing socially schismatic. Yawn.

      Ever seen a poor vegan? Nope. Ever seen a poor person that had to have everything certified 'Microsoft free' by some snotty hardware company? Nope.

      Real people eat the food they can afford and like the taste of, and real people buy a computer and use Windows or install their own blend of Linux. Practically every new PC runs Linux, including laptops. Regular people just buy a laptop and install Linux. Only snobs and zealots care about their computer being certified as "Windows free."

      Note to author of article: get over yourself, dismount your high horse, and get on with life.

    6. Re:I smell a rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, yeah. A couple of my friends are poor vegans...

    7. Re:I smell a rat by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      At least until they turn 25 and they get the trust fund.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    8. Re:I smell a rat by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Linux zealousy and vegetarianism/veganism are both just forms of snobbery for overly wealthy people to throw money at in hopes of appearing socially schismatic.

      Oh, please. That "Vegetarian/Veganism is for rich folks only so it's bad" bullshit can be applied to damn near any expensive food preference. In Japan, the older generation grew up with food shortages during the depression, war, or reconstruction so kids were told "Don't have any preferences! Eat what you're given!". That's a good thing to teach kids, imho, but when you grow up and have extra money, it's all right to be choosy. I'm not a vegetarian or vegan, but if someone wants to spend their extra money on eating vegan instead of eating steaks, that's fine with me.

      btw, I'm not a linux zealot, either: I have two linux boxes and two windows boxes at home.

    9. Re:I smell a rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      poor people suck

    10. Re:I smell a rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Linux zealousy and vegetarianism/veganism are both just forms of snobbery for overly wealthy people
      Give me a break. For some poor vegetarians, how about Hindu India for starters. And as for poor Linux users... again, how about the Venezuelan and Chinese governments? Developing countries have great reasons to eat/compute on the cheap. As do I.

      You're probably right about zealotry being confined to those who can afford it though.

      --Zirtix, not logged in.

    11. Re:I smell a rat by seite-f00f · · Score: 2, Informative

      >Your preferred distro installed and fully tested. I would expect all hardware to work as well or better than it would under Windows.... ... don't think so, in some cases they do not test nor integrate:
      the Twinhead N1400 sold by the "Linux Only" Laptop shop http://linuxlaptops.zoovy.com/product/TW_N1400 has a "Infrared Port (SIR/FIR)" which is not supported under Linux (at least until someone hacks a driver). not to mention the "Optional Built-in GPRS module"
      the laptop works out of the box (except irda, gprs) with all newer distributions and is a fine machine (sitting in front of one of those rigt now -- runnning FreeBSD of course :-) ), but you will get a much better bargin if you by it from some Win32 shop.

    12. Re:I smell a rat by elgaard · · Score: 1
      And that is why we need naked PC's and not just Linux PC's.

      If a company were selling the same PC as eg. Naked, Win XP, Redhat then you would know what you were paying for.

      If a Redhat PC cost the same as XP but more than a naked PC, they better offer a lot of tech support.

      In december I bought a naked laptop from Metro (in Denmark) and put Linux (debian) on it. I am sure I did not pay a Microsoft tax--The laptop was cheap ($1000) and Metro's Naked PC's are generally cheaper than the ones with Windows (although the naked computers are never identical to to the windows ones).

      I keep a list of places to purchace naked PC's in Denmark. Several places do sell naked laptops.

    13. Re:I smell a rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >vegetarians get reamed for "Organic" produce..

      Are you suggesting that "organic" farming is less costly to the farmer than "conventional methods?"

    14. Re:I smell a rat by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Linux on a laptop is very much a specialty item. Anytime you buy ANY specialty item in ANY market, it costs more. Production, marketing, etc. There aren't people knocking down any doors to get Linux on a laptop. Without the mass production, you've got to pay more. That's how it is in AN market.

    15. Re:I smell a rat by sheldon · · Score: 1

      "That's evidence that the system has broken down. It costs more to buy a product WITHOUT the monopoly OS than with it."

      Next time you are out car shopping demand that you be allowed to purchase a car without a stereo.

      You used to be able to do this, back 20+ years ago. Try it, go ahead... I'm curious to see how far you get.

      Or better yet... Demand to buy the car without tires! Say you have your own tires that you want to put on.

    16. Re:I smell a rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      taking it up the butt the same way that vegetarians get reamed for "Organic" produce

      What does a vegetarianism have to do with organic produce (and why the quotes around organic? it does exist you know, just make sure it's certified by a trusted authority ;)?

    17. Re:I smell a rat by ThePackager · · Score: 1

      I'm down wid dat. The Window OS apparently is the bane of so many crabby, self-important, elitist, know-it-all, loudmouth, geekoid, Linux obsessed hack-jobs. So what if The Legions of Gates have made it easy to get things done for the vast majority of us? We obviously have more important things to worry about than whether $40 or whatever made it way to Redmond. It's like paying to have your streets plowed by your community. Sure you could do it yourself. For a lot more money or effort. But for the rest of us, we're fine with the "tax" to get it done efficiently. Would we want more control, more choices? Beyond the pricey but limited in software Apple? I suppose we do, but in any society or community, there are tradeoffs. In Slashdotland it seems like there are a lot of the Pro-Linux/Apple voices, but you've just been distilled here. The 'loud outraged' really aren't that large of a body politik.

      --
      Please have respect for people with different abilities, especially children.
    18. Re:I smell a rat by a7244270 · · Score: 1

      Vegetarians don't get reamed for "Organic" produce out of spite or ill will, its just economics.

      A field of crops requires X dollars to harvest, irrigate, package, distribute, etc. Say that with fertilizers/steriods/insecticides it produces N units of crop, and without it produces N/10. Obviously the organic crops will cost 10 times as much.

      Remember also that the cost of the chemicals is proportionally very small, so the chemical savings are nowhere near enough to counter the vastly produced production.

      Harvest are much smaller when "Organic" methods are used - look at the production numbers for dairy cattle if you REALLY want to be amazed.

    19. Re:I smell a rat by MarcQuadra · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But considering the cost of Windows compared to the hardware it's like saying that when you buy the truck you are required to get it with a jetski in the bed. A stereo is 2% of the total cost, windows costs a heck of a lot more than that (proportionately).

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  68. Re:I-buddie - ECS (DESKNOTES BEWARE) by andrewjjenkins · · Score: 1

    Desknotes are good so long as you know what you're getting, which is NOT a laptop. Desknotes are full-fledged computers with a small enough form factor to look like laptops. They come with no battery, and one isn't even available for most. Again, if what you want is a portable computer that runs off of wall current, then that's fine, just so long as you know that's what you're getting.

  69. Go refurb! by Howard+Beale · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Get an off-lease IBM Thinkpad. I bought a Thinkpad 600x refurbed by IBM, upgraded the hard drive to a 30GB, 5400 rpm IBM HD, and then replaced the stock 650 MHz processor with an 850 MHz. After maxing out the RAM (just over 580MB), this thing cooks!

    I keep looking at laptops nowadays, and keeping getting PO'ed at vendors that put a 14" screen in a 15" case. The damn thing looks nice, but is BIG and HEAVY. Then the keyboards on the 12" Sonys looks small. Why don't manufacturers keep making 13" displays???

    1. Re:Go refurb! by TCaM · · Score: 1

      Might you be willing to point me to any documentation as to how you upgrade the cpu in a Thinkpad?

    2. Re:Go refurb! by Howard+Beale · · Score: 1

      Check out IBM's web site for your specific model of Thinkpad. I downloaded their pdf on the 600x's Hardware Maintenance Manual. This gives you step-by-step instructions on taking your Thinkpad apart.

      Do a search on Google or Yahoo for some of the web sites that discuss the Thinkpads in depth (I did a brief search, but couldn't turn up the one I found most helpful).

      There are different CPU modules and types - they are not all interchangable. Make sure you are upgrading with the correct model. *** Also, use an OS that will put the CPU in idle when not in use. Windows 9x will not, and the CPU will overheat. Windows 2000 and Linux (ones I use) work fine.

      PS - I hold no responsibility if you fry yourself and/or your system!

    3. Re:Go refurb! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a perfect computer for you. It will be much cheaper than that IBM crap and actually fit your description exactly. I own one. Acer Travelmate 350TE: 4.1 lbs, .85" thick, P3 650, 13.3" screen (!), dual USB, Firewire, and Ethernet built in. PC Card slot for wireless, plus a smartcard reader. I've got Redhat and XP Pro on it.

      With all that, I never use the thing - my true love is my original 400mhz Powerbook; it's quieter, sleeker, has better battery life and a much better feel to it. Still, if I could sell both for a 12" Powerbook I would die a happy man.

  70. http://www.qlilinuxpc.com by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    QLI Linux has a few different laptops running linux and windows free, but they weigh in near 7lbs so that might be kinda heavy.

  71. Actually... by VS1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    with an emperor(sp) laptop, you got a windows machine that simply has linux on it now.

    In essence, your buying a windows machine. those laptops are all sonys and ibms and such. they bought the laptops, reformated the hard drives, and installed linux.

    --
    "Humanize war? You might as talk about humanizing hell!" -- British Admiral Jacky Fisher
  72. Go with the ibook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I own an ibook, and I can say from experience that this thing runs linux flawlessly. The video card in the older ibook (Rage 128) is fully supported under current ppckernels, meaning full DRI and AGP, not software emulation. The ppc archictecture is well-suited for mobile devices because of it's lower power consumption compared to its intel counterparts. I can get easliy 3.5 hours of battery life on this thing running Xfree86, perhaps more in console mode. I hear the newer ibook batteries can perform even better. You have everything you need port-wise, including vga out under newer kernels (excluding modem, which no laptop these days offers under linux). Moreover, the 802.11b support is there. The design is nice and the case is modable (http://www.applefritter.com).

    If I were you I would decide now if you want OS X or not. If not than I would buy a used ibook online (rage128 based). You could easily spend less-than $1k on this. If you would like to use OS X and don't care so much about running linux than I would fork out some cash for the newer ibooks, which aren't as well supported in linux, or go for the 12in powerbook (go for the g-spot).

    Some ppclinux sites which might be useful:

    http://www.ppckernel.org
    http://www.penguinppc. org
    http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/

    Remember that their is no such thing as a perfect machine. Everything is about your needs!

  73. 12" TiBook Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slighty Smaller AND Lighter than the iBook - packs quite a punch as well. 5hr battery life (according to apple), built in CD-RW/DVD or DVD-R...

    http://www.apple.com/powerbook/index12.html

  74. I was going to say something insightful, but: by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I decided against saying something terribly insightful about the "Microsoft Tax".

    I *do* find it F*cking hillarious that you would buy and Apple notebook computer, and load linux onto it, and be just as happy.

    OHMYGOD: Apple won't sell a laptop without an OS either. THE BASTARDS!

    It's quite odd that the /. populace will ram shit and vinegar down the throats of the companies that build PC laptops because they preload Windows on them, but it seems fine and dandy to pay for a notebook from another supplier, and get the OS you don't want there either. Why?

    You feel better about paying the "Apple Tax"?

    Now, Merits of Mac OS X aside, if the poster wants *Linux* on the desktop, buying an iBook hardly fixes the problem, as a matter of fact, it does just encourages Apple, 'Cause no-one complains.

    In an Ideal world, you could buy that notebook Windows free. Trouble is, welcome to earth. Suppliers like companies that build millions a year vs thousands a year. They get cheaper access to the components to build laptops. Even if you find a distributor that ships and OS-free laptop, the added cost for that distributor to build laptops in small quantity would drive up the price, most likely past the point of buying one with Windows included.

    Buy the laptop based on what you want it to have, suck it up and chuck away the Windows or MacOS license. Or resell it on ebay.

    Now, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.

    --
    "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    1. Re:I was going to say something insightful, but: by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The only thing that makes a Mac a Mac anymore is that Apple puts their name on it and their software in it. No more ROM. You can buy PowerPC-based boards to run Linux (just not a laptop yet, so far as I know).

      Apple isn't charging a tax for their OS, they've always been a firmware company. You're buying a Mac as a total package. You don't buy a PC from Dell as a total package. Dell makes none of the hardware, none of the software, it's just cobbled together.

      Why can't I buy an SGI without IRIX? Why can't I buy a SPARC without Solaris? Why can't I buy an RS/6000 without AIX? Why can't I buy a Palm without Palm OS? Why can't I buy a C3750 without HP/UX?

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    2. Re:I was going to say something insightful, but: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, maybe some people LIKE the Mac OS and think it's rather safe. It's not like they can lock you in to running Emacs with Fink , yah know.

    3. Re:I was going to say something insightful, but: by mchappee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're comparing apples to oranges (no pun intended). If Microsoft made the laptop we would all expect to receive a Microsoft OS upon purchase. An "OS tax" would be a given. The situation is true of Apple. Apple brands the laptop as their own, thus it's acceptable to bundle it with their OS. The question is regarding the hardware that has no tie to the OS. Should I have to give a little of the overall cost of the hardware to Microsoft even though I'm not doing business with them? If so, that would be a tax. If there were a plethora of PPC laptop vendors out there, and none of them would sell a laptop without MacOS, then you would have a point. As it is, however, your example is flawed.

      --
      /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
    4. Re:I was going to say something insightful, but: by Bartmoss · · Score: 1

      The difference, naturally, is that Apple does not go to the lows that Microsoft will go - maybe because they are not a monopoly and thus can't; but I am sure this is the guy's point anyway.

      Plus, Mac OS X is actually an OS that works pretty well, compared to the stuff MS dares to sell.

    5. Re:I was going to say something insightful, but: by Graff · · Score: 1
      I decided against saying something terribly insightful about the "Microsoft Tax".

      I *do* find it F*cking hillarious that you would buy and Apple notebook computer, and load linux onto it, and be just as happy.

      OHMYGOD: Apple won't sell a laptop without an OS either. THE BASTARDS!...

      You feel better about paying the "Apple Tax"?

      I totally agree that either way you are paying for the operating system, whether it is Windows or MacOS. I think the difference is in the moral objection to the companies.

      Microsoft is well known for being rabidly anti-Linux and anti-open-source. They have said many times that Linux must be crushed and that the GNU license is a viral license that is a plague upon the software development community. Paying a "tax" to them is akin to donating money to a company that wants to stamp out the Linux operating system you want to install on your notebook.

      Apple has made great strides toward supporting open standards and open source. Yes, they are still a company that produces and uses a large amount of proprietary, closed-source software but they don't seem to have anything against using open-source if it fits the situation. They are out to make a profit like everyone else but they at least take a stab at being as non-evil about it as possible.

      So, on the whole I'd rather pay the Apple tax verses paying the Microsoft tax. It's not really about the money spent, but rather is about who the money goes to in the end.
    6. Re:I was going to say something insightful, but: by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

      Um... isn't Apple partly owned by Microsoft anyway?

      --
      Long live the Speaker Bracelet
      Rolo D. Monkey
    7. Re:I was going to say something insightful, but: by Spencerian · · Score: 1

      No, it's not.

      This is common troll banter. Apple compelled Microsoft to buy stock as part of its settlement over various patent and IP suits. In return, Microsoft made Office 98 and later Office products for Mac, including IE, and got to cash in their stock after three years, which has already happened.

      Microsoft's stock was non-voting, meaning they couldn't affect the course of Apple beyond ignoring their agreement with Apple.

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    8. Re:I was going to say something insightful, but: by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

      I assure you that my post was not meant as a troll. My only "real" source of information on this was "The Pirates of Silicon Valley" which definitely gives you the impression that Apple gave up some of its control to Microsoft in the end. Thank you for clearing up my misconception.

      --
      Long live the Speaker Bracelet
      Rolo D. Monkey
  75. IBM by r_arr · · Score: 1

    I have an IBM thinkpad a22m sure it came it with windows but it runs linux great. Linux supports all the hardware except for my 56k modem. I don't use it so I didn't bother to configure it. And out of the big pc makers they are the most linux friendly.

  76. Twinhead N1400 by redjeremy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I recently bought a laptop called an "ITC Ultraport R1000', which is actually a rebadged Twinhead N1400. The people at the shop (Arrow Computers, Perth, Australia) were kind enough to remove the WinXP licence from the package, and take a bit off the price.

    (One of the main reasons I bought this computer was because the retailer gave me a brochure which listed Linux as a supported operating system. At the very least, this allows you to take it back if Linux doesn't go)

    Linux runs well on it, after a bit of a play with the drivers (support from the company hasn't been great, but it's easy enough to get everything working). It's a P4 1.7GHz (1.2 on batteries), VGA & SVideo out, a firewire port, 14.1" screen at 1024x768, 3 USB2.0 ports, CDR/DVD drive, onboard ethernet & modem, 1 PCMCIA slot and optional internal 802.11b. It's small, light, and it looks cool.

    Best of all, it was one of the cheapest Notebooks I was looking at, $2800 AUD :)

  77. I'd say local connections helped G get his refund. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Folks, Adelaide is a city with a "small town"
    mindset... you know the one: "everybody knows
    everybody"

    I'd bet that G's dad's Cisco connections did
    more to get G the cheque from Toshiba than
    anything else, even if the dad in question
    didn't have to lift a finger to make it happen.

    I don't think that the not-so-well-connected
    (read: needy, eg, student of Linux) computer
    buyer would get the same hearing - let alone
    a similar refund.

    To test this: How many -other- Australians
    managed to win similar refunds, at about the
    same time (ie, even -after- G's [uncashed]
    refund cheque was photographed & published
    online)?

    Not too many...

    "Plenty of good info"...? Doubtful at best.
    How good depends on how many, who do similar
    footwork, will -ever- get -their- refunds,
    in future.

    Good means effective, not just -apparently- so.

    Now, if someone had complained (eg to Oz's
    ACCC), eg that vendor(s) were requiring them
    to buy unwanted product/license/software from
    another source, ie just to get the chance to
    buy the computer they wanted to purchase...
    -that- might have got a refund-right for every
    Linux user.

    But, no, that wasn't how G did it... He stopped
    when he could show (without cashing) the photo
    of his refund check... let the others do their
    own haggling...

    Read: Re-Invent the refund [paper-chase] wheel!

    Result: -Lots- have visited the online photo
    of the uncashed check but -few- have
    got a refund of their own.

    Com'on people, the only way to change this
    is to work a bit smarter... & together... ie,
    if you want to win, not just cheer-lead... ;-)

  78. sounds like you want a sony vaio by AssFace · · Score: 1

    go to ubid.com and find a refurbished one - some come without OS, or just write over whatever is on it.
    you get the most bang for the buck that way.

    the vaios are thin, quiet, light, have firewire, and are excellent quality.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  79. powerbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go with a brand new powerbook g4 17"....mmm i'll drool all over that. plus you can use ppc linux

  80. Obligatory Powerbook answer by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's been said, but not like this.

    Look, what you really want is a PowerBook. You know it, everyone here knows it. You just won't admit it.

    So let's compare features. The Apple certainly has no potential whatsoever of running Microsoft Windows except through some complete emulation/virtualization software. Score one for Apple. The Apple comes with an actual GUI far superior to Microsoft Windows (not even a contest) and much more polished than your typical UNIX GUI. Score another (or a couple) for Apple.

    Want more? Well, your Mac is actually capable of running Microsoft Office should you later find yourself in a bind and be REQUIRED to deal with it to put food on the table. On the plus side, you can always pirate it and you don't need Windows or Windows emulation software to run it. That's worth about a half a point (MS Office isn't that great in my book). Your Mac will also be able to run just about any open source program you want. Furthermore, Apple has now even decided to provide an official version of X11 which they have even extended to allow full access to the OpenGL extensions. That means that you can create "lickable" GUIs using the X Window System.

    But even if you don't want to run Mac OS X (and trust me, you will), you can always run Linux on it. There are several very good quality PowerPC distros available. Furthermore, even if you go this route, it still doesn't preclude you from running MacOS X (or 7 8 or 9 for that matter) using the mac on linux software.

    And on top of all of that you'll be supporting a company who actually understands that it is customers that drive the bottom line; a company that creates GUIs that even your mom can understand, GUIs that actually make sense and help you get on with what you are trying to do-- especially if you are a hard-core geek.

    So please at least consider the Powerbook. It's a sleek machine, it's extremely solidly built (well, the 12" model I hear leaves something to be desired, but the rest are excellent). It comes with a good OS. You can run Linux on it. And you're not supporting a company that supports Microsoft. In fact, you are supporting a company that actually competes with Microsoft (on some small level). A company whose CEO made a little deal with Microsoft and got a lot of gain for very little (putting MS IE in as the default browser, BFD).

    In short: you know you want it dude!

    1. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by BlackBolt · · Score: 1

      What if he wants 100% open source? Linux won't boot on the new 17" PowerBooks yet, Apple's screwed with the Bios or something, I think to kill OS9.

      And really, if he wants to run Gnu.Linux, he can get a better power/price ratio elsewhere. True, the PBs are cool as hell, but so are the IBM ThinkPads and some Toshibas and Sony's I've played with. I own a ThinkPad A31P, which is this big fat bastard with everything possible built into it -bluetooth, dual wireless antennas, sidebar numericpad addon, etc. I run Gentoo on it and it absolutely KILLS a top of the line PowerBook. I wouldn't recommend it for size, though - the IBM X Series rocks for that (no personal experience beyond picking it up in amazement).

      For security reasons, the company I'm at won't let me run a Mac there because they can't PROVE there's no backdoors in OSX. They're paranoid (rightly so, being a large banking interest) and they won't run ANYTHING that their code monkeys haven't scanned every line of code or they haven't written themselves. They've got OpenBSD and Linux on servers, another handrolled Linux on the desktops. If Apple would do something like Microsoft's "shared source" where the freaking BILLIONAIRE who owns this thing could have his guys just look at the *complete* source (not GPL it or distribute it; JUST INSPECT IT), they'd be in. But Apple as usual ignored our many requests (I've been pushing for Macs for a long time, but Apple's so stupid and stubborn I just gave up on them one day), so then my manager realized they were incompetent (they're less incompetent now, but not much) and had us short Apple hard in 2001 and we made a huge wad for the company when they fell apart.

    2. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by moncyb · · Score: 1

      For security reasons, the company I'm at won't let me run a Mac there because they can't PROVE there's no backdoors in OSX. They're paranoid (rightly so, being a large banking interest) and they won't run ANYTHING that their code monkeys haven't scanned every line of code or they haven't written themselves. ... If Apple would do something like Microsoft's "shared source"...

      This makes no sense. The DRM "features" in Windows Media Player are a backdoor. The product activation system in XP is a backdoor. As soon as MS's Palladium project is completed, the entire,/b> system will be a huge backdoor where MS can do anything they want with your computer. Not to mention if you don't compile MS's "shared source" into an OS yourself, how do you know they gave you the real source?

    3. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by mako · · Score: 1
      They're paranoid (rightly so, being a large banking interest) and they won't run ANYTHING that their code monkeys haven't scanned every line of code or they haven't written themselves. They've got OpenBSD and Linux on servers, another handrolled Linux on the desktops.

      Wait a minute. Are you saying that your organization has done a complete White Box audit of most Linux packages (including the kernel and all modules) and OpenBSD? Was this a top down analysis? This is a *huge* undertaking. Did you guys get any good white papers out of this work? How long does it take to do this? Did you guys baseline a particular revision and just go over every patch after that, or do you do re-audits on each major release? Very interesting.

    4. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      But Apple as usual ignored our many requests (I've been pushing for Macs for a long time, but Apple's so stupid and stubborn I just gave up on them one day), so then my manager realized they were incompetent (they're less incompetent now, but not much) and had us short Apple hard in 2001 and we made a huge wad for the company when they fell apart.

      He could have shorted any tech company (ibm, for example) in 2001 and made a huge wad for your bank. Apple is doing shockingly well, given the economic climate.

      Also, you are right, there is more variety among PC laptops, but the Apple line provides an excellent ballance of size and features. If he wants a small full featured laptop, it doesn't get much better than the 12" pb.

      And Apple machines don't use BIOS. They'll have the 17" booting in a week. Hacking OpenFirmware is all kinds of fun.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one couldn't get PowerBook. Why? One-button mouse! I can't stand that thing! And if I were to run Linux on it, it would be come real nuisance real soon. What's that I hear? "just use an external mouse!". Well, to me, using externam mouse in counterproductive and kinda defeats the purpose of having a mouse built in.

    6. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 0, Troll
      It's been said, but not like this.

      Yes it has. Lots of times.

      Look, what you really want is a PowerBook. You know it, everyone here knows it. You just won't admit it.

      What the hell is this, Freud? He has presumably evaluated the options, and decided he wanted a PC laptop without paying for Windows. Those were the requirements. Why are people having such a hard time dealing with this? You can tell there aren't many salespeople on this site, second guessing the customer is a quick way to lose sales.

      So let's compare features. The Apple certainly has no potential whatsoever of running Microsoft Windows except through some complete emulation/virtualization software. Score one for Apple.

      WTF? A lack of an option is a feature? Only a true Apple shill would claim that.

      The Apple comes with an actual GUI far superior to Microsoft Windows (not even a contest) and much more polished than your typical UNIX GUI.

      Evidence please. Quite a few Mac users aren't so impressed.

      Want more? Well, your Mac is actually capable of running Microsoft Office should you later find yourself in a bind and be REQUIRED to deal with it to put food on the table.

      Except that it's not Office. If you already own a copy (quite likely), you might as well just use it, and get perfect compatability. On the other hand, he already said quite clearly he didn't need any Windows software, which presumably includes Office. Piracy can be done on any OS btw, at least on Linux you don't actually need to.

      That means that you can create "lickable" GUIs using the X Window System.

      This has got to be a troll. It lets you do what you have been able to do on every other OS for years, namely display X apps. It doesn't alter their appearance.

      And on top of all of that...... *snip*

      Why should he care about any of that? Oh, and that's a nice hidden font preview you've got there.

      And you're not supporting a company that supports Microsoft. In fact, you are supporting a company that actually competes with Microsoft (on some small level).

      This is definately a troll. Apple "competing" with Microsoft is an interesting parlour game, but no more. You were advertising the virtues of IE and Office earlier.

      What is it around here? Do people get commission on every Mac sold or something?

    7. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      On my iBook there was an unnecessary extra enter key very close to the touchpad that can be remapped to act as the right mouse button, and I use F11 for the middle button. The middle button is slightly annoying to use but the right button works absolutely fine.

      There are other reasons why I don't recommend the iBook but the mouse button is not an issue at all.

    8. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      Except that it's not Office

      Huh? What are you talking about??? If you'll check http://www.microsoft.com/mac, you'll clearly see that MS has released Office v. X, which is a Mac version of MS Office that is fully compatible with Office XP.

    9. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by BlackBolt · · Score: 1

      Excellent points, and I agree. But I guess I didn't make myself clear. They don't let us run any Windows software at work - but the management does see their "shared source" thing as being a step in the right direction (openness), one which Apple should take in order to get access to the corporate setting, governments, etc. We don't care what license Apple puts their stuff under, as long as our techies can see all of it.

      But no, we'll never use Windows, shared source or not. Can't see it.

    10. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by BlackBolt · · Score: 1

      I'm not an official tech guy, so I don't know what a "white box audit" entails, but they ran homemade software over everything to find backdoors and links to the outside, then manually checked everything that was flagged as possibly suspicious. They almost have more tech guys than traders here, and some of them do nothing but monitor the network and look for bugs. I don't know if they submit patches, but I think so. They're specifically looking for any malicious stuff and possible security holes. They check patches before they apply them, but they don't upgrade our systems much, they're more like appliances. Stripped down appliances, with most of the bloat gone. But they sure boot fast!

      I'll give the friendliest geek this link and see if he wants to respond.

    11. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by David+Kennedy · · Score: 1
      I was going to say exactly the same thing as this post.


      I've been using Unix of various flavours for the last decade, but never actually had a home PC of any flavour. I'm strictly a software guy (that's how I make my living) and was a bit dismayed at the Linux setup process - Linux is fine, it's the hassle with drivers and what hardware I want. Bleugh.


      Last year I finally bought a PC for home use; a 15" Titanium PowerBook (TiBook). It's Unix (BSD), has X11, a very nice interface, and compiles almost everything I've ever tried first time. It's expensive (especially with a gig of RAM and 60gig of disk) but it's amazingly well finished hardware.


      OS X is nice, everything 'just works', I can develop happily on here, but the real joy comes from having an iPod (20 gig, I had a redundancy settlement to spend) to carry with me to work/gym.


      I agree wholeheartedly with the Microsoft tax position; I've no problem with Microsoft as a software company, in fact I bought Office as I need it for work (yes, I could have used OpenOffice, I know, but this was easier and looks nicer). I do however object to paying for something I don't want when buying hardware.


      So, here's my position. Buy an Apple laptop. They're loaded with features, and have terrific build quality. The run native Unix for open-source fun, and can easily run Linux if you want. I wanted to give my money to a player in the market who is opposing M$. I wanted competition. Buying one less laptop from $MAJOR_HARDWARE_COMPANY doesn't dent their bottom line; they have the corporate market sewn up. Buying one more Apple however does change the demographics. One more Apple is one more consumer Unix machine, and one less Windows license. Think about it as voting with your buying money.

    12. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

      Well, when I wrote this I thought that some of my points would be picked up as humor. I guess there's always one bad apple (hah, no pun intended) that spoils the bunch. Let's try this again, shall we?

      First of all, no where did the guy say he specifically wanted a PC laptop. He wanted a laptop that ran Linux and didn't come with a Windows license. Thus, "Get a PowerBook" seemed like a pretty good answer to me.

      All the stuff about "Look, you really want an Apple... you know you want to" was all sarcasm. I'm sorry that your persoality is so dull that you completely missed out.

      I still maintain that a laptop that cannot possibly run Microsoft Windows is a definite plus. You might not agree, but I think it's a good thing. Of course, maybe I'm still just being facetious, take a guess.

      No GUI design is ever going to fulfill the needs of 100% of all computer users. A lot of die-hard MacOS (< 10) users were quite surprised by OS X. Many of their complaints have since been addressed, a few still remain. I did read the article you linked to the other day, and the author does make some valid points. My impression was that he was ranting more about the Apple applications and not so much about the GUI in general. In fact, he had good things to say about the GUI in general and was mostly talking about how the Apple apps were broken because they did not follow the appropriate OS X guidelines. A lot of that I actually agree with. I'll touch on the font preview here too. Yes, I agree, it's stupid. I have no idea why a normal splitter wasn't used, it would have looked just fine.

      I'm not sure what exactly you mean by "it's not Office". It is Office. Works just as well, usually better, than the PC version. And despite the still prevalent thought that it is not compatible with the PC version, it is. Even monster page layouts come out just fine. Unless you've used it recently, please stop spreading rumors about it. Of course Linux and FreeBSD can now run the Windows version as well (on x86 hardware). Believe me, I'm well aware of it, I followed Wine development for quite some time and even contributed some code-- some bugfixes and a minor reworking of the ASPI stuff which has since (2-3 years later) been majorly reworked. Anyway, I know the guy said he didn't need any Windows software (presumably including Office) but it never hurts to have the ability (and I jokingly gave it a half point on account of that and other factors).

      Apparently you are unaware that Apple's X11 implementation actually provides the Apple OpenGL extensions and thus you can do some pretty cool rendering on it above and beyond that provided by other X implementations. Of course, I'm sure you couldn't be bothered to take the time to get your facts straight.

      So apparently I am the troll for stating the facts (and adding a little bit of humor), but you are clean as a baby's bottom. In my message I didn't swear (WTF). I didn't use italics and bold type to emphasize words when my arguments didn't make any sense. I didn't call the poster a "linux shill" or a "Pee-C" user. I didn't link to articles that seemingly had something to do with my point, but in reality didn't.

      In fact, I thought I made a pretty convincing argument for at least taking a look at the Apple stuff. In response I am flamed. Perhaps someone is maybe just a wee bit envious? A case of buyers remorse perhaps? I come up with valid reasons for using Apple hardware, and you get all pissy and tell me how Apple sux0rs and PCs rock.

      In short: Piss off you fucking troll.

    13. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

      You know, a funny thing has occurred to me.

      We both sound so much like those switcher ads you see everywhere. I don't know about you, but I'm sure I'm not getting any money from Apple.

      From a geek perspective, what's not to like? Apple machines are real UNIX workstations, not some poorly assembled Pee-C crap. If you don't believe me, take a look for yourself. Compare the build quality of the PowerBook (just lift up the keyboard) to just about any other laptop. Compare the quality of the G4 towers to any PC. The only people making better hardware than Apple are the real big-time UNIX vendors like Sun, HP, and SGI. And they don't even attempt to come close on price whereas an Apple computer is still reasonably within the reach Joe consumer. Of course, Joe consumer has to be someone willing to fork over dough and receive a quality product in return. Some people aren't. For those people, e-machines exist and are supported by bugging the shit out of your friends to fix them.

      I find it quite humorous the negative responses that I gather from a supposedly geek forum when I talk about Apple. My best friend (in real life) actually modded my original post DOWN because he was sick of hearing me talk about Apple. This same guy spent money tricking his PC out with fans and neon lights and all kinds of whiz-bang doesn't do shit but looks cool stuff. Apple? "Oh, that's too much money to spend on a computer."

      Oh well, I guess if I still used a PC on a regular basis that I too would have a lot of anger. And I'd probably also direct that anger at someone who no longer sympathizes with it. In other words, I have no sympathy for a Windows user's computer problems.

      Let me clarify that. At work I do help people because it's part of my job, and because I understand that they have no choice but to use Windows. So I come up with the best solutions I can, drawing on my over 18 years of experience with PCs. But for home users I can no longer justify spending my time digging up solutions to their problems or fixing all but the most basic of Windows issues. I'm not afraid to outright tell them that I feel a Mac may be a better choice when it comes time for a new computer. Hell, I think if I didn't say anything I'd be doing them an even greater disservice than if I am a little overzealous about Macs.

    14. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by methangel · · Score: 1

      Yup, since I am the best friend mentioned in the article, I decided right my wrong and moderate this insightful.

      As for Windows problems? I have none. Haven't had any Windows-related problems in well over 4 years. Now, driver problems, that's a whole new can of worms. Poorly written drivers does not define the operating system.

      As for my "tricked out" computer, it's called a 35.00 case w/Window with a 15.00 cold cathode light. Now, if I can have that kind of glitz and glamour on an Apple for just 50.00 more sign me up.

      My system costs a quarter of what today's Apples are going for, and it's pretty damn fast by today's standards.

      That's all I have to say about that.

      It is my ambition to have ambition

    15. Re:Obligatory Powerbook answer by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

      :-)

      One thing I should mention about the driver issue is that at least on Apple I can boot to single user mode and move the "kext" out of the way without having to use an antiquated filesystem (FAT32) or some (hard to find) software that writes to NTFS.

      On more than one NT system I have actually had to use Linux NTFS write support to purposely screw up driver files so that Windows wouldn't load them (since the write support is not good enough to actually rename a file). Last known good didn't work since it actually got to the login prompt and it crashed when I hit Ctrl-Alt-Del.

      Does it help Joe blow? Well, in a way. At least if Joe Apple hoses his system by installing some rouge kext I don't have to spend extra time finding software to fix it, it's already there. That was always one of my biggest gripes about Windows-- I was actually required to go out and purchase or find extra utilities (sometimes from Microsoft competitors-- i.e. Linux) in order to fix the Windows system. Now that is pretty damn stupid!

  81. Re:800 x 600? Nooooo! by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    I would have to agree. My girlfriend has a HP something or other (N6310 comes to mind) and the screen is a HPA (not quite active, but not quite dual scan ... aka it is dual scan) at 800x600 and it just doesn't cut the mustard.

    Go at least 1024x768 Active Matrix - accept no substitute.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  82. Custom laptops by rossz · · Score: 1, Informative

    NCal computers at http://www.ncalcomputers.com/ can put together a laptop to order. They speak Linux.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  83. Uh, what? by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    PC users are always telling me that PCs are faster and cheaper, and I'd be happy enough running Linux for what I want the notebook for. So: I'm looking for PC notebook computers that outperform the iBook?Performance isn't a major concern, as I'm not going to be playing 3D games on it.

    Am I the only one so far that has caught this paradox?
    Basically this guy says he wants everything in a 12" PowerBook G4 but says he wants an IA-32 architecture notebook because he hears PCs perform better, then goes on to say performance doesn't matter.

    I'd look at how a PowerBook performs compared to a mobile version of an IA-32 processor. Not how a Mac and a PC compare in desktops, especially since you're going to be running Linux, which I really don't know why you'd not go for the Mac because you get Mac OS X, Classic, plus the ability to run everything Linux runs with a recompile.

    --
    Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    1. Re:Uh, what? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1
      Well, for one thing, some people, old time geeks, mostly, have a list.

      On the list are two items:

      boycott Microsoft. Everybody knows the reason.

      boycot Apple. The closed-source hardware company.

      There are often additional items on the list as well. I don't know why there are so many Anything-but-Microsoft people who hang out in this forum these days. It's almost as if the Macintosh ghetto is being fumigated and they needed a place to hang out. But geez, I hope they air out that ghetto soon and those people leave.

  84. HP Pavilion ZU 1175 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is my personal laptop of choice. Smaller and lighter than an iBook. No firewire, but lots else to offer.

    700mhz Mobile PIII
    256 MB Ram
    12.1" 1024x768 active matrix screen
    Pointer style (like ibm) mouse.
    Includes Base Station with CD-RW and DVD (1155 has CD-RW and Floppy IIRC). Laptop is a single spindle design. 2-3 hours on a charge. $1500

  85. Re:800 x 600? Nooooo! by PeekabooCaribou · · Score: 1

    Heh, I've never run a display at more than 1024x768. I've used a 15" Acer monitor with my Linux machine for some time, the 12" LCD on my iBook, and my old 17" Apple Studio Display. I get sort of lost and confused at anything higher than that.

    Anyway, I'm all for bringing back 832x624. Anybody remember those Apple setups? ;) Enough for an extra icon horizonally! Isn't technology amazing?

    --
    "I'll say it again for the logic-impaired." -- Larry Wall.
  86. Just *buy* something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just choose the hardware I wanted, and bought it.
    In this case a nice new Sony Vaio PCG-R505ECK
    Yes, it came with Windows, but I also got the hardware I wanted.
    As far as compensation for the "M$ Tax", I am now just *extremely* rude to M$ and the BSA when they call or send "post cards". ;)

  87. Re:Don't buy a Sony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, all you have to do is turn of APIC Advanced Programmable Interupt Controller, all your problems will go away.

  88. Sounds like you want a *used* iBook by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    Long battery life, decent performance, all the features, small, lightweight, more than 800x600

    Someplace like, say, http://www.powermax.com or something.

  89. ibooks are fine by b17bmbr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i have a 12", 700mhz/256mb ibook. all my linux apps that i need are there. especially a nice vim port. i run X with gimp, and it runs great, while i am testing mysql/php on apache, have mail open, mozilla, and assorted other stuff. and it doesn't lag at all. i don't know what all the bitching about speed is about. of course i can't "compile a kernel in 5 minutes...", but i have all the power i need. no, i'm not playing UT2K3.

    and, the best part, i get 3.5-4 hours battery, plus, the it truly is a laptop. i can leave it my lap for hours. everything just works. usb, firewire, cd-rw, etc. yes, i have gotten all to work fine in linux. i use linux in my classroom. have for a few years. i was thinking seriously about a dell, or powernotebook.com laptop. but i ended up with the ibook simply because it is a sub 5 pound unix laptop and i didn't want to pay the m$ tax either. if you measure the price, you're not giving up too much with an ibook compared to a PC laptop. and you're getting a ton more. just get minimum 256mb, preferrably 384mb.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  90. Buy a Used Laptop - No Microsoft Tax by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy a Used Laptop. Someone else may already have consumed a MS license on that hardware, true, but you will not be consuming one yourself. None of your money will be heading to Redmond (unless you account for the effect of resale value of hardware that was originally sold with a MS license).

    eBay is a great place to start looking :-)

    --
    The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
    1. Re:Buy a Used Laptop - No Microsoft Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think you do end up buying the MS license. I think the new EULA states that if you buy/sell a computer with Windows pre-installed, you must transfer the license with the computer. So when you buy a computer with Windows pre-installed, YOU aren't actually buying Windows.

    2. Re:Buy a Used Laptop - No Microsoft Tax by genesplicer · · Score: 1

      Used looks to me to be the only way to do it ...

      I'm sure many of us here regularly avoid the MS tax on desktops by rolling our own, but that's not really an option with laptops (Is it? I haven't the faintest idea how to go about getting the parts and building a laptop, and I've been building desktops for years ...) ... eBay seems to have a great selection of used machines - I've been trolling there for a little while now looking for a top-notch used laptop for essentially the same reason as the original poster (and the cost factor too) ...

      In addition, although we may want to make a political statement by avoiding the MS tax, how many of us implicitly support MS by using their products because we have to (even if we don't pay for the products)?? I'm viewing this page with IE while working on a PowerPoint presentation and writing a manuscript in Word right now because MS Office is mandated by my workplace ... I'm dual booting at home because, if I want to do work related stuff, there's less hassles if I just use Office ... I don't like it, but I'm sure there's lots of others here stuck in the same position ...

      --
      Me? Debunk an American myth? And take my life in my hands?
    3. Re:Buy a Used Laptop - No Microsoft Tax by 2ms · · Score: 1

      By buying a used MS notebook from someone, you're only giving them the money to go buy a new one. It's really exactly the same.

    4. Re:Buy a Used Laptop - No Microsoft Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably that person would be buying a new computer to replace the one sold anyway.

      More to the point, you are taking one MS-licensed machine off the (used) market, forcing somebody somewhere to buy a new one instead. So MS still gets their money.

  91. Angel laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have bought several laptops from these guys and they are knowledgable and reliable. They have several OS choices including Redhat and none.

    http://www.angelcomputer.com/cgi-bin/index.pl?pa ge =detail&id=62&country=us&pp=22&type=bu s

  92. How about a 4.6 pound laptop? by azav · · Score: 1

    Presenting the new 12-inch PowerBook G4, featuring a brilliant 12-inch active-matrix display housed in a durable aluminum alloy enclosure weighing just 4.6 pounds. The most compact full-featured notebook in the world starts at just $1799

    from:
    http://www.apple.com/powerbook/index12.ht ml

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  93. statement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont think the poster is neccessarily trying to make a statement. he just plain and simply wants a hassle free laptop without having to waste money on something he isnt going to use. not everything is about makeing a pro-linux statement.

  94. Fujitsu P2120 aka EmperorLinux Piranha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://www.emperorlinux.com/piranha.html

    • Must have USB - Two USB ports
    • and Firewire - One FireWire port
    • built-in ethernet - Internal 10/100 Mbps
    • ethernet
    • and 802.11b support - Internal 802.11b 11Mbps wireless
    • Small is important - Tiny: 10.6"x7"x1.59"
    • lightweight is important - 2.8 - 3.4 pounds
    • long battery life is important - 3 hour Li-Ion battery
    • screen size so long as it can do 800x600 - 1280x768x24bpp w/ ATI 3D Rage graphics
    • I will not purchase Windows! - EmperorLinux, Slackware, or Mandrake
  95. Hold on... by kevinadi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Man, if you're looking at the white iBook and you say it's too heavy then you're in for a trouble. At 2.2 kgs that thing is light enough, lighter than about 90% of laptops there is. There goes 90% of your choice.

    Then you want one with long battery life, and most laptops nowadays have 2-3 hours. I approximate there goes another 70% of what's left of your choice.

    Also you'd like one with USB, Firewire, ethernet, and wifi support. I think you can get USB and ethernet built in, and wifi is probably there too, but firewire is relatively new in the PC space, so you'll probably gonna need one in a PCMCIA card. The problem is usually PCCards are power hogs, so you won't get the full maximum battery life out of it. Beats me how iBook did it and still have a decent battery life. I approximate you lost another 60%-70% here.

    The problem is you don't want to pay for windows at all. Most PC laptop manufacturer today simply don't want to bother refunding windows because most laptop devices require very specific driver to work. For example Toshiba doesn't even have a BIOS setup, all is done through an app in windows. The last laptop I've used that has a BIOS like in desktops (and you'll _definitely_ need one of it) is Dell. But none of Dell's models are lighter and smaller than the iBook.

    So in conclusion:
    1. Your choice is extremely small, if you did find one exactly like your spec, maybe it'll be just one machine with no other choice.
    2. Some of your requirements are contradicting one another, try to loosen up in some area.
    3. Even when you did find one, it'll probably be extremely expensive. Or, it'll be of very low quality from an unknown manufacturer.

    I think your only choice is that iBook you're looking at in the first place. It's just a tad heavier and bigger than you like. The only other viable option is the Picture Book from Sony, but you'll have to swallow the windows license there.

    I got the same problem before, as I already owned a Win2000 CD, and I needed to purchase two laptops. Mind you, I purchased them _in sequence_ and they blow up in sequence as well, so no two copies of them running at the same time, blah blah blah. In short me and my windows CD are perfectly law abiding. But no, I have to buy _another_ windows with each laptop I bought. Now I have multiple copies of 2000 and XP scattered around, and me end up paying MS tax multiple times.

    It's pretty frustrating, I know, but trying to get what I wanted was extremely difficult (I needed a high performance one. Light, and small if possible) and the chance of finding it was small. In your case, it's very miniscule.

    My suggestion is don't try to look for something that doesn't exist, you'll be wasting your time and energy getting frustrated. Get that damned iBook instead :)

  96. Sotec Notebook by vwbus · · Score: 1

    I recently went through the same scenario and decided that I could buy a cheaper notebook with Windows XP Home on it than I could without it. So I purchased a Sotec. It is a 4.4 lb notebook with a beautiful 12" screen that does 1024 x 768. DVD/CD-RW combo drive and a SIS chipset. Linux (Mandrake 8.2) runs on it great. The best part is the notebook cost less than $900 You can check it out at Sotec. Office Depot, Wal-Mart and Sam's Club are resellers.

    --
    Ted Kitch www.tedkitch.com
  97. iBook too big? by joel8x · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I use my iBook for everything I do, and take it everywhere I want. It's only 5 pounds and it is a full featured computer. I use it for photo management and home movie editing, music listening and recording, it acts as my PDA, I watch DVD's on the train with it, and I bring it to work every day and use it to perform all of the tasks that I can't/won't do on my PC. I have an Airport card which I use at home and comes in handy in strange places (like the new bar in the LIRR section of Penn Station!) I can hook up to my ReplayTV and stream recorded TV shows and movies to my laptop while on the throne. I burn music and video Cds wherever I want. I mange and charge my iPod with it. I can't imagine going back to a life without this machine, and I can't imagine someone thinking that it's too big!! It's so perfect to me that I really would urge you to just go for the iBook (or the new 12" Power Book if you have the $), you won't regret it. You may find an Intel based laptop that can do all that, but I guarantee you you will not find one that can do all that flawlessly and easily in such a small package - with or without Windows.

    You didn't specify what exactly you want to do with your laptop, but given the ports and features you are requesting, these examples are a small representation of what you could do. If you go with the iBook, I guarantee you that you will do things on it you never would have bothered doing before because Apple has a way of making applications like iMovie that make the task simple, fast, and fun.

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
  98. IBM by NetJunkie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out an IBM X series ThinkPad. It's their ultralite series. Very nice. Many of the current Thinkpads can be ordered with 802.11b on a mini-pci card with integrated antennas.

    They also sell the Thinkpads with Linux.

  99. Which laptops support QNX? by Animats · · Score: 1

    I have a need for QNX laptops, in support of a real-time application. Has anyone successfully run QNX on a laptop? (Preferably with decent graphics performance, not in VESA mode.)

    1. Re:Which laptops support QNX? by xScruffx · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a eMachines eSlate 450k (yeah . . . i know) that ran QNX relatively well, so I'd imagine that just about ANYTHING would.

      xScruffx

  100. Fujitsu P Series by ovidus+naso · · Score: 1

    I have a P2110. Very small. Widescreen LCD, 1280x768. Gorgeous screen. Just a bit over 3 pounds. DVD/CD-RW. 802.11b. Firewire. TV/VGA out. Runs Linux just fine. Transmeta 866MHz CPU (hello Linus). Long battery life (up to a full working day using a hi-cap battery and a modular bay battery.
    Have a look at leog.net for lots of info on running Linux on these machines.
    But it comes with an closed-source OS though, like 99% of the notebook in this class. Tough.
    It might be possible to get a standard class notebook free of MS licences, but I doubt you can find one in the subnotebook class.
    And I doubt that Apple will sell you one of those nice 12" TiBook without the OS so that you can put Yellow Dog on it. Call it the Cupertino tax...

    --
    ---------- ovidius naso
  101. Re:Don't buy a Sony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With which OS?

    I can't speak for Linux, but I currently have a Lexmark x83, USB mouse, and Digital Camera plugged into my 3 USB ports on my GRZ530 running XP.

  102. Cassiopeia FIVA 2xxs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Casio's Cassiopeia FIVA 2xx series (Page in Japanese only) has both Win and Linux installed by default, and it allows you to switch the boot block with external switch... It weighs just above 2lbs, supports 800x600, does have PC card slot, USB, LAN, 1394/FireWire port, CF slot and VGA port (with converter cable). The Crusoe 500/600MHz, 128MB RAM (upgradable to 384MB on most models) and the video interface with only 2MB VRAM can be a pain, but it is a decent combo they pulled.

    Unfortunately its production has been halted, and in addition, the series were hardly distributed in US market. Of course, since this still contains some flavor of Win, I guess it still does not qualify for the original poster :-P

  103. i wouldn't by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    though most notebooks are made by compal, asus, and a few others, all in taiwan, there is more to it than that. laptops have all sorts of parts and pieces that can go wrong. desktops are put in spot x and stay there. laptops go all over the place. so, 1) a company that stands behind its stuff is worth a c-note or more, 2) the qualtiy control and testing is better at name brands, also worth a few bucks, 3) there is more to a laptop then the sum of its parts, namely the monitor. you look at a crappy laptop monitor for a few hours, you're gonna go blind.

    plus, lots of stuff such as hard drives and memory are left out. so, dell will put better ram and hdd in. i'm not pimping dell, hell, i own an ibook. just that i did the same a few years ago and bought a CTX laptop. first one didn't boot. back to circuit city. second one, dead modem. circuit city wants to send to ctx. f*** that, so i buy a pcmcia modem and nic. and screen is crap. and keyboard is lousy. but strangely, all parts linux compatible. laptops are not like whiteboxes. spend a few bucks more up front. it is worth it. laptops have a typically will be used longer than desktops. a bad desktop means 6months to a year. a bad laptop means 2-3 years. cheap laptops are pennywise and pound foolish.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  104. dynamism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dynamism.com has great laptops from Japan most of them should run linux my favorite is the sharp it is 2 pounds and .54 inches thick. I've seen them in Japan and there are great. good luck

  105. So, essentially.... by bigt_littleodd · · Score: 1

    ....you want to buy an iBook. Small, not MS Windows, yada yada yada, USB, Firewire, etc. YDL is free, as in beer.

    --
    Let's play Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. I'll be Pestilence.
  106. Try Fujitsu by asuwish4 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought a Fujitsu Lifebook P-2000 Series and I love it. I'm not the terminal, Anti-Windows guy, so I got it with XP. In the customization part of their website, you can get rid of Windows, but your savings will only be what they pay for a copy of Windows; not what you would pay. My Lifebook has 2 USBs, 1 Firewire, 1 RJ-45, 1 RJ-11, and built-in 802.11b (not PCMCIA). It uses a Transmeta Crusoe Processor, 256Mb, 40Gb HD, It weighs 3.4 pounds and the battery life is ~3 hours. Other battery options allow up to 14 hours (I'm told). This thing cost me $1299 and it's awesome (except for the Win XP :-) Also check out Laptops Inc. They have a good selection of used ones. Good Luck!

  107. Don't you pay anyway? by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Microsoft site licenses usually require companies to pay for machines which don't have Windows on them. I can only imagine that Microsoft makes the same requirements on computer vendors when they sell machines without Windows, or with some other OS. So even if you buy a new machine without Windows, you will probably still be lining Microsoft's pockets buying such a machine.

    And as another poster mentioned, you will probably spend way more money buying such a machine from some no-name vendor (and still pay the Microsoft tax) compared to the cheaper price of a name-brand laptop with Windows pre-installed.

    One alternative for the poster is to sell a $50 pen with a free copy of Windows included :)

    --
    In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    1. Re:Don't you pay anyway? by Steve+Hamlin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Microsoft site licenses usually require companies to pay for machines which don't have Windows on them.

      Depends on the license that companies have, but not generally true.

      ----- -----

      I can only imagine that Microsoft makes the same requirements on computer vendors when they sell machines without Windows, or with some other OS. So even if you buy a new machine without Windows, you will probably still be lining Microsoft's pockets buying such a machine.

      Not true anymore. Microsoft USED to force OEMs to pay OS licenses for every PC shipped, regardless of whether every PC actually has Windows installed on it.

      Microsoft and the U.S. DOJ signed a consent decree in 1994 that halted this 'per processor' license fee (among other practices alleged to be improper).

      OEMs pay licenses only for machines shipped.

      Now, between volume rates, advertising allowances, joint marketing & partnering arrangements, licenses for other products, etc, etc,. MS still has incredible licensing flexibiliy, and due to its market control, massive power over those OEMs. But no licenses for every machine shipped.

    2. Re:Don't you pay anyway? by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

      That consent decree covered only MS-DOS, which is why such hoopla was made over Window 95 "booting to Windows." They went right back to their old OEM licensing.

  108. Panasonic Toughbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at Panasonic Toughbook R1 and T1
    Torsten

  109. Metamatic - your answer. by Glonoinha · · Score: 5, Informative

    Metamatic -
    Sounds like you want a used machine. I would suggest looking on ebay and/or the computer refurb houses for a machine that is maybe a year old, go with a high quality manufacturer and it could still be under warranty (I personally like Dell, I have three within arms reach of me, counting laptops and my server.)

    The only issue I see going with hardware that is a year+ old is the 1394 connection - but if it was top of the line a year ago it should have that connection (my last Latitude C800 did and it was a year and a half old.)

    Note that you should be able to find a one year old machine for about half of what it cost new, but remember that today's hardware costs less than top of the line gear did a year ago and is much faster. Based on what I remember, you should be able to get whatever was top of the line a year ago for the same price as the entry level stuff new, but the entry level stuff is going to be about 1.5x as fast as the one year old top of the line machine.

    I am not saying it will give you the best bang for the buck, but it will satisify your entire request. Personally I would buy a new entry level machine from Dell (or your favorite company) for about $750 delivered and then toss the XP CD / license in your closet. Add some aftermarket RAM and networking gear and you are all set - for about $900 including the 802.11b.

    I just checked, Dell has a laptop (the Inspiron 2650C) on sale for $700 after rebate (yes, rebates suck but I did get mine back ... so it worked for me) :

    14" screen XGA
    128M RAM (www.crucial.com)
    20G hd
    24x CD
    16MB DDR 4X AGP NVIDIA GeForce2 Go(TM)Vid
    Floppy
    Integrated 56k modem and NIC
    1 year warranty.

    If you didn't want to jack with the warranty ($150) you could get the 802.11b PCMCIA card and a 802.11b router (I didn't bother to read the details) instead. Brings the price of the system to $850.

    Upgrade to a 15" screen for $50.

    Nice.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:Metamatic - your answer. by lordsid · · Score: 2, Informative

      if you are going to buy a dell ALWAYS renew the warranty, i have a dell inspiron 3800 700mhz, good lord is it falling apart. in total i've had 2 full system replaces and 3 mobos. and i can't even count how many times i wore out the keyboard.

      --
      IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
    2. Re:Metamatic - your answer. by Stonent1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dell Financial Services sells computers on Ebay with No-OS and they are factory refurbished to like-new condition. Many still have an original extended warranty which is transferrable! DFS Ebay Store.

    3. Re:Metamatic - your answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wish Apple had had something set up like that. I am still looking for a used Apple that will run OSX with some degree of success for under $400. Apple's retain value like a BMW.

    4. Re:Metamatic - your answer. by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      No shit. I've been wanting to pick up a used blue and white tower for a few years now and they still cost as much as an a new Emac.

    5. Re:Metamatic - your answer. by blixel · · Score: 2, Funny

      What is a 1394 connection? If you mean IEEE 1394 compliant connectors, then the official name for the standard is FireWire.

      Well we all knew what he meant, and clearly so did you. So what's your point?

    6. Re:Metamatic - your answer. by Glonoinha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have watched the resale of Dell hardware intently for quite some time. They suffer the same problem all resellers have : the old stuff doesn't depreciate as fast as the price on new stuff comes down.

      One year old Inspiron 8200 top of the line : 1GHz w/ 20G drive = current ebay price $900.
      Brand new entry level Inspiron 2650C : 1.6GHz w/ 20G drive = current new price $750.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    7. Re:Metamatic - your answer. by dsl · · Score: 0

      But... Emacs is free.

      --
      I refuse, on principle, to have a .sig.
    8. Re:Metamatic - your answer. by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      G3/333 Beige or G3/350 B&W should be at or under $400US.

      Both will run OS X, with decent amounts of ram. both take PC-100 or PC-133 SD-RAM.

      I've got a 333 with the UW SCSI and 256Megs ram, runs OS X decently (Video is a bit slow, but a PCI Radeon Mac edition or PCI Rage 128 will solve that).

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    9. Re:Metamatic - your answer. by meme_police · · Score: 1

      I don't see anywhere where you mention size and weight. After all, those were high on the purchaser's list of priorities.

      --

      The meme police, They live inside of my head

    10. Re:Metamatic - your answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are comparing two different computers. That 1.6GHz is a Celeron and involves rebate=risk. Ebay is a nearly perfect efficient market, so that is exactly what they (8200) are worth - they are selling! There's no problem!

    11. Re:Metamatic - your answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody ever run across a manufacturer only honouring a warranty if Windows is still installed?

  110. Re:We recently had a thread like this in c.o.l.mis by Fiver-rah · · Score: 1

    "Linux has a harder time with some of the ultra-small notebooks; they use weird proprietary drivers which Linux does not support a lot of the time." Enh. I'm running an ultra-small (Portege 2000 and the only thing that won't work is the modem. Which sucks for just about every laptop out there, regardless of size.

    --
    Read Bujold. Free (as in
  111. Pre-Configured Linux Laptop for Sale... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

    Already is running RedHat, and I'm throwing in a 802.11 card. It's a cel 1ghz, 20GB hard drive,
    256MB ram. It has a pretty small form factor (13.1"), and is a Toshiba 2805.

    I'm selling it w/ 802.11 card, carrying case, and Linux preloaded for $800 (Negotiable)

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  112. netlux by Karth · · Score: 2, Informative

    Netlux
    They have some decent laptops for cheap. For weight, I seriously doubt that in any way you are going to beat an ibook. You will have to decide, is the size and cost going to beat the weight and possibility of the MS tax.
    The netlux machines work well, my brother uses one on a constant basis, but it's really up to you.

  113. Think about it this way... by sremick · · Score: 1

    Seems a lot of people only get a $20 refund when they bitch about the "Windows Tax". Some mention $125. So let's say you're lucky, and could get $125.

    I bet you anything that the off-brand laptop you buy for $x will spec out less than what you could get from Dell for $x+125.

    Plus you won't get the service, warranty, etc that you would from a huge name like Dell.

    From a monetary standpoint, it makes no sense. If you need to pacify your conscience, consider the inclusion of Windows with the laptop as something to make it more resellable later on down the line.

    Consider this analogy: I buy a car with the full intent of gutting the audio system and putting in my own custom one. But I don't bitch and moan that I can't get one WITHOUT a stereo included. Why? Because later on, when I go to resell it, I'll put the factory one back in. Try reselling your car without a stereo.

    Disclaimer: I hate MS more than most people (but about par for /. readers). My personal computer is Wintel-less (Athlon + FreeBSD).

  114. stick with the fruit already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iBook/Powerbook will make you a happy motherfucker.

    You can get going with Unix on there right away, no need to install a new OS, no M$ tax. When I first opened up terminal and typed "vi" on A FUCKING MAC, I literal spunked. (Well I was checking out some Aria Giovanni at the same time which might've had something to do with it, lemme tell yah that bitch is *GRADE FUCKING A*! Anyway..back to this mac shit...)

    I enjoy fucking around in Linux on my desktop, but sometimes you just want to open the damn computer and burn a fucking CD, or connect to a web site and look at the goddamn Flash shit without any hassles. Don't listen to those PC cocksuckers: Mac hardware is perfect in the laptop form factor. You'll be shocked to learn that batteries last more than an hour or two on the Mac, furinstance.

    The Mac is good shit, you won't be disappointed with that new shiny aluminum fucker, that's for sure. You'll be like a schoolgirl that just discovered her pussy, playing with it all night long. Fuck yeah.

  115. The iBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the iBook. The smaller iBook is extremely light and portable and WELL worth the investment. I am EXTREMELY happy with mine.

  116. M-Tech Laptops by SWPadnos · · Score: 1
    http://www.mtechlaptops.com has laptops without Windows.

    They have all the features you're looking for, except the weight, and they are all available without Windows.

    If you think 2.8Kg is a "brick", then I think you're up a creek. (My M-Tech is a 10.8-pound cinderblock by that standard :)

    The 25RG is the smallest. It's also damned expensive, since it's their "semi-ruggedized" model (spill-resistant, gel-coated screen, etc).

    I have bought two computers from them, and have been very happy with them. Both run Linux just fine, though I haven't tried the newer hardware out under Linux lately.

    --
    - The Sigless Wonder
  117. Sony VAIO PCG-SRX7F/P by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    Well...my VAIO has that....builtin Orinoco, ethernet, firewire, and USB. And it's lightweight (2.75lb).

  118. My experience with Dell refund by nurd68 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They basically ignored me until I told them that I would never buy a Dell again. (Which has more to do with poor design (who puts the hard disk and cdrw on the same ide controller?) and poorer customer service (they refused to sell me a replacement video card, so I bought one from ebay). Piggybacked on to this was the "whom do I email about returning this bundled software", and they completely ignored that question.

    So, this is what I did.
    1.) Don't boot the software.
    2.) Don't open the software.
    3.) Since you have not agreed to these licenses, the "thou shalt not resell this" does not apply to you.
    4.) So, I resold the license to a guy at work for $50. (There was no real OS CD, just a recovery disk. However, he had one already, so I just sold him a license).
    5.) In theory, you could sell this on ebay, but I've heard of MS using its' clout to pull those ads.

    Of course, there is another reason to actually fight with the OEM - MS can no longer publish those "we run on 95% of all consumer PC's sold", when what really happens is that many people wipe the disk and install another OS. (I'd call it perhaps 25% dual boot, and maybe another 10% just do 1 OS.)

    1. Re:My experience with Dell refund by MeanMF · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, I resold the license to a guy at work for $50. (There was no real OS CD, just a recovery disk. However, he had one already, so I just sold him a license).

      You might want to re-read that EULA. OEM licenses are not only not for resale, they're tied to the hardware. It doesn't matter if you booted it or not - your co-worker did, and he's running an unlicensed copy. It sounds like you got the better of the deal. :)

      "Software as a Component of the Computer - Transfer. THIS LICENSE MAY NOT BE SHARED, TRANSFERRED TO OR USED CONCURRENTLY ON DIFFERENT COMPUTERS. The SOFTWARE is licensed with the HARDWARE as a single integrated product and may only be used with the HARDWARE. If the SOFTWARE is not accompanied by new HARDWARE, you may not use the SOFTWARE."

    2. Re:My experience with Dell refund by nurd68 · · Score: 1

      Aha, but:
      1.) I read all licenses that accompanied the software that were not INSIDE the software.
      2.) None of them said the above (this license might have been a "you can read it after you open the package which means you agree to it" type license, but those are illegal anyway)
      3.) The only recourse Dell gave me was to contact them.
      4.) Dell ignored me when I tried to contact them (3 emails over 2 weeks with no responses until the 4th where I told them what to go do with themselves)
      5.) Therefore I did not agree to the terms of the license that you mentioned above.

      So, I suppose that my co-worker, who did agree to the license, MIGHT be legally responsible, but that would be the extend of it.

      Now, there is the larger issue here - let them come. A court case about this crap is just what we need to get it out in the open and in the public eye. It will be this century's Scopes Monkey Trial!

    3. Re:My experience with Dell refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make it sound like someone having an "unlicensed copy" is a bad thing. As long as it's legal (and it is), an unlicensed copy is worth more than a licensed one, because it has so many fewer restrictions.

    4. Re:My experience with Dell refund by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      Therefore I did not agree to the terms of the license that you mentioned above

      I think you're fine - it's your coworker who paid $50 for a license that is only valid on your computer. If he actually wanted to pay for an XP license, he might as well have payed for one that was legit...

    5. Re:My experience with Dell refund by YoJ · · Score: 1

      If the seller didn't agree to the EULA, why does it matter what the EULA says? It doesn't.

    6. Re:My experience with Dell refund by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      If the seller didn't agree to the EULA, why does it matter what the EULA says? It doesn't.

      It doesn't matter at all to the seller - the buyer is the one with the problem. The license is valid on the machine that it was sold with, and no other.

  119. IBM ThinkPads by hendridm · · Score: 4, Informative

    IBM ThinkPads work well with Linux. You might have to sell the farm to afford one, but they're quality.

  120. Re:Knoppix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I had no problem talking with most sales people about linux. Most of them had no clue what it was, but I did bring a bootable bussiness card (http://lnx-bbc.org) and they didn't have too much of a problem leting me boot it after showing them the website. It doesn't exactly prove that everything will work, but it does prove that you are able to run a lot of stuff, most importantly that you can get the kernel to load and X to work properly. Bring knoppix or demolinux if you want, if they have a problem with it, just go back later and stick the cd in and do a hard reboot. If anyone questions you just say you're seeing if it will run what you want, most of them will leave you alone after that, if they don't, walk.

  121. Mod parent down: -1 TRUTH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There will be none of that here

  122. Buy Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Look, I don't do gaming, but I do...do high end AI and EE-Circuit Processing. Buy a Dell for $1200, and just reformat it. The Linux Revolution will still progress.

  123. try this by sootman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Visit http://store.apple.com/ then click the 'special deals' red tag in the lower-left corner. Bang, Apple-refurbed products, most notably the $800, 600 MHz iBook. It might be heavier than you want, but the screen goes to 1024x768, and at that price, it might be worth looking at again. Also, 22" flat panels for $1349. woo hoo! Otherwise, hit eBay for a used VAIO.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  124. Have you checked out Fujitsu Lifebooks? by stupkid · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at a Fujitsu Lifebook

    Alas they come with Windows. :(

  125. Try Dell Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell configures laptops with redhat installed . Check out this link. They do a pretty good job of that. Not sure about firewire though.. But you could buy them seperately

    http://www.dell.com/us/en/esg/topics/linux_000_p ro ducts.htm

  126. Hmm by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1

    Don't know if they're this X-Technology, but if so, I'm not sure I'd risk it.

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  127. Try this place for small linux notebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So far I've found iDot Computers, who will sell laptops with no OS installed. Unfortunately, their lightest, smallest offering is a hefty 2.8kg brick, 3cm bigger than the iBook in width and depth. What I really want is something comparable to a Toshiba Libretto or Sony VAIO R505--except that neither of those companies want to sell me a machine without Windows.

    I'm sure plenty of Slashdot readers have faced the same problem--what's the solution?"


    Try Emperor Linux , and tell them Vin (another future customer) from NYLXS sent you. We have another user that has one (the small one with the cam), and it is fantastic. And their support is fantastic as well.

    They offer small libretto style laptops, with gnu/linux installed, and they know and support what they sell.

    Now if I could just scrape up the coin to buy one myself...

  128. Re:Knoppix. by Cokelee · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm sorry, I know this is a little offtopic, however, it needs to be said.

    Quit it with the DAMNED cheerleading. It seems that every chance anyone ever gets to mention a distro they like or they think is superior in any way shape or form they must at all cost mention in any obscur way. Slashdot's advertisements aren't as effective as these comments. People actually read these comments and mod them up thinking "Wow what an ingenious . . ." whoa, hold on a second that's an advertisement for another Linux distro--GEEZ!

    By the way visit redhat.com

    Cheers!

  129. Re:We recently had a thread like this in c.o.l.mis by Cokelee · · Score: 1

    It's weird when you think that Linus Torvald works at a notebook CPU manufacturer. Just an interesting thought.

  130. Vegetarians deserve to get reamed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Anyone willing to murder plant life so they can eat deserves to get reamed. Royally reamed.

  131. You dont have to agree to the disclaimer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you dont break the seal of the windows CD, then you can return it and recieve a refund because you aren't agreeing to the EULA. This should work on many computers that come with windows

    Auzy

    1. Re:You dont have to agree to the disclaimer by La+Temperanza · · Score: 1

      That is why they don't give you a Windows CD anymore. They preinstall everything and give you one of those system restore CDs. I suppose if you never boot up the OS you might still be exempt from the EULA, but it would be a tough argument.

      --

      --
      est modus in rebus
  132. Dude! You're getting a Dell! by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

    Dell 's Ebay Store currently there's 75 laptops, and most of them are naked.

    --
    Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
  133. Re:Knoppix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    might have something to do with the way you come across.

    the way you look, smell, sound...

    time for a hard look at yourself ;-)

    i've had the same problem, so don't feel too bad.

  134. OS X is very very slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It's so slow it isn't funny. On a G3 400mhz Powerbook with some obscene amount of RAM it's horrendously slow.

    On a G4 450mhz tower it is still incredibly slow.

    1. Re:OS X is very very slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how much ram you've got in your machines, but OS X on my G4 400 PowerBook works just fine. It's not slow.

      I look forward to years of use still to come with my OS X PowerBook.

      When's the last time you could say that about a PC laptop?

  135. Dude, order one from there yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude! Try ordering a laptop from the link you provide yourself, and let us know how far you get. Then provide a better link.

    Or go get your fuckin' shinebox!

  136. Re:800 x 600? Nooooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like 1024x768, but I have three monitors, so it's more like 3072x768. :) It's nice to not have to screw around with fonts for 100 hours trying to make them big enough to see.

  137. Talk about wierd drivers... by lpret · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a Sony U3 that I just got in Japan, and I tried to install Red Hat on it. Ha. Red Hat had no idea what was going on, it couldn't find a sound card, anything to use the extra buttons, jog dials etc. and the resolution was terrible. Needless to say, I put my M$ back on, cried, and then slipped it into my shirt pocket.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:Talk about wierd drivers... by mako · · Score: 1
      Really? What a shame. I was just going to ask if anybody had tried to put Linux on one of these things. Here is a link for anyone unsure of what this is Sony U3

      So, how much effort did you put into getting Linux to run? Do you think it would ultimately be possible? Otherwise what do you think of this thing. Is it worth the money?

    2. Re:Talk about wierd drivers... by megabeck42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not only is it possible, but, I have a U3 in my backpack running linux. There are a bunch of patches to get a lot of the custom stuff working, and not all of it is entirely functional, but, it runs like a champ. Supposedly it works betterw ith devel, 2.5.x kernels. Only qualm I have with it is the size of the keyboard, keys are very small - I'd try one before you buy it.

      --
      fnord.
    3. Re:Talk about wierd drivers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like all of my experiences with Linux!

  138. That's the point... by cnelzie · · Score: 2

    Only God knows how many services are running on a Windows Server. The system administrators surely never do. You know why? They aren't God.

    However, on a *NIX based system, the Admin is actually equal to God on that server. Allowing that on Windows would defeat Microsoft's purpose of having control of everything.

    Anyway, 600Mhz, would be much more then fine for a Linux desktop/laptop system. Heck, it would even be good as a server. As a good "for instance", I have a PII 350 with a 32MB TNT2 video card with the Accelerated 3D graphics drivers from Nvidia. I tell you, it's not the fastest, but it is able to run an Open Source game called "Racer!" pretty well.

    You should see the graphics and the tectures in this game. The detail that was done to the vehicle models is very impressive. I can honestly say that under Windows, you would need a machine at least twice as fast to be able to display the graphics this game displays under Linux.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  139. Another vote for the Fujitsu P-Series by Rainier+Wolfecastle · · Score: 1

    Someone above mentioned the Fujitsu P-Series, and I have to second that. I have a P-2110, which has an internal DVD/CDR (often external or in dock on ultraportables) and just about everything else that you would want. Well, as long as you don't want to play serious games on it. It runs a Crusoe processor, with decent performance. The whole caboodle weighs in at a trim 3.5 pounds.

    I am running Slackware 8.1 on mine, and everything works. There is also a good community for the notebook, located here.

    The newest models also just came out, which have better video cards too. I'm very happy with mine though. The 10" screen (which is widescreen, BTW) can be tough on the eyes, but if you're looking for a good, Linux-running ultralight, this is one to look for.

  140. Re:Knoppix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way you closed out implies you're kidding, but for those who take this seriously, the only reason the guy mentioned Knoppix is because you can boot into a full Linux system from a Knoppix CD without even having a hard disk.

  141. Any retailer splitting Windows from laptops? by racer7890 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like to know if any retailer actually splits Windows from a laptop when a customer requests it and then installs THAT version onto a desktop machine for someone else. Is such a thing even legal (I assume it would be)?

  142. Re:Don't buy a Sony... by rco3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    BZZZTTT! Wrong!

    It's not that USB can't work. It's just that the ACPI implementation in the kernel currently sucks rocks, and most Sony laptops seem to use ACPI to assign IRQ's. Add the ACPI patch from the acpi project and all that problem goes away. SuSE 8.1 does that for you, and their kernel maintainer keeps a cutting edge, functional kernel around. The Linux-Sony Mailing Lists have all the info needed to get everything working under Linux. Everything.

    I have an SRX-87, which is significantly smaller than an iBook, functioning completely and without exception with Mandrake 9.0 and a patched vanilla kernel. Firewire, USB, 802.11b, DVD - the works. Wait - I haven't tried the modem. I hear it works too, though.

    It's the same thing that Emperor Linux rebadge, and lots cheaper from BestBuy.

    I'm very happy with mine.

    --

    Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  143. Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Apple by BigDish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just wondering-the author was looking to buy an iBook, but is blantantly opposed to paying the M$ tax. What about the Apple tax that come with Apple hardware? Apple won't sell hardware without an OS.
    The iBook is cute, but, IMHO overpriced. Moreso, the lack of a PC Card slot and the lack of IR means I won't be getting one.
    The author is going out of his way to avoid giving MS any money for something he won't use, but seemed to have no problem paying apple for software he won't use. My point is perhaps he should not be outright opposed to buying windows if he gets a better machine. Windows "only" adds maybe $30 to the cost of a PC.

  144. Financing a notebook purchase? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

    Anyone know where to get a laptop with "easy" financing options? ie. no credit, but no bad credit either. No luck with the big names (Dell, HP). Would be nice to pay over 6 months or 12 months or something.

    1. Re:Financing a notebook purchase? by eagl · · Score: 1

      Try the bank... Either a signature loan or put your pennies in the bank until you can buy one outright.

  145. Think About Older Technology by joelil · · Score: 0

    Our company disposes of old technology from companys accross the United States. and for a couple of hundred dollars you can get a used laptop with no os installed for next to nothing. then add the features you would like.We don't offer any os so we do not pay microsoft.All data is wiped off the systems.(clean slate). I have loaded linux redhat on a 133mhz laptop with 64m of ram and 3g hd. and it works just fine.So if you are willing to configure the system your self. look on e-bay or other auction sites. Our site product changes daily. (I will not leave the site address or name.....I don't beleive in using a forum like this for promotion of the company i work for...if you are interested e-mail me and i will give you the information.) I enjoy this site and don't want to open a pandora's box of company promotions....that would suck.I learn alot of new information every day from this site.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers.
    1. Re:Think About Older Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      I've looked on ebay quite a few times. The prices used laptops are reaching are ridiculous.

      I have a toshiba laptop with a 120Mhz/48MB Ram, but I can't use it for anything until I get the accounting data from my old company off of it (taxes still have to be done, within the next six months), and some other business files off of it. But I can get the same brand/similar model laptop and pull the memory from the original one, and in less than six months I'll have spare parts. But everytime I check ebay, even these laptops are going for over $300. Considering that some laptops with PIII 1Ghz/128Mhz Ram specs can be found below $900, and I've seen even below $800, why would I waste $300-$350 when I could get so much more performance/longevity out of a newer laptop?

      I'm sitting it out for now, unless I find something useful below $200. Hopefully the market will become saturated enough within the next six months where cheaper laptops can be found, especially with the coming release of the Banias chip. By then I'll probably be able to use my old Toshiba.

  146. get an ibook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont know what your priorities are, BUT, most of the ultra-light portables that people have suggested here do NOT include a cd-rom/dvd drive integrated into the laptop. either they are on a docking station OR an external casing connected through a usb/firewire port.

    whichever way, the docking station/external drive means that it is EXTRA weight, if you want to use your cd-rom/watch dvds/yadayada while on the move. how inconvenient having to plug in a cd-rom/dvd drive.

    also, there is the issue of wireless. ultralights (correct me if i'm wrong) usually don't have a pc-card slot. and pc-card wi-fi cards are battery HOGS.

    what i find absolutely remarkable is how apple are able to fit in a cd-rom drive with firewire/usb/modem/airport card/ethernet port/etc. in a casing that has a 12 inch screen.

    so looking back upon it, the ibook/powerbook isn't really a heavy thing is it?

    one other thing, if you buy a windows laptop is the issue of driver compatibility when you switch it over to linux. i find it hard enough trying to upgrade my friend's compaq winme to win2000 due to a lack of drivers. linux on that i won't even bother.

    that's why i recommend a 12 inch powerbook or ibook. driver compatibility with ppclinux is not as big an issue.

  147. Re:I-buddie - ECS (DESKNOTES BEWARE) by SlasherX · · Score: 1

    If you read up on the DeskNote you will find that all models support an external battery, they charge extra but still well under the cost of extra batteries for normal laptops.

    The battery is external and comes in handy if your just going to plug it into AC in a motel room. (don't have to lug the extra weight.)

    You can also buy the desknotes with linux installed at no extra cost (Turbo Linux I think.)

    The only down sides I have found is the lack of pcmcia support and the need to buy an external floppy (perhaps the last is a plus side?)

  148. Discountlaptops.com by alienw · · Score: 1

    Discountlaptops.com eems to have an excellent selection, good prices, and no Windows. Check them out. I don't actually have any experience with them, but they seem like a pretty good dealer.

  149. Speaking from experience: by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    What you need is an IBM Thinkpad X30.

    It's got 2 USB, firewire, DVD/CD-RW slimline, builtin ethernet, ATI Mobility, 1024x768 14" screen, a PIII-M cpu at 1.2GHZ that sips power (almost 4h on one Li+ battery) and also doesn't burn your legs, even optional builtin Wifi. It is incredibly light, even the docking station (which is a little extra "layer" that holds the slimline CD/floppy and another battery). The footprint is smaller than most, but the reduced weight = happy hacking anywhere.

    Redhat 8.0 works divine on it (detects both batteries, wireless and IEEE1394). No messing around with it.

    Whole deal will set you back between $2000 and $2400.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  150. Re:Knoppix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or you could try virtual linux-(bootable cd based on mandrake 8)

  151. Buy used, put one ms licence out of circulation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not only not paying (well acually you are but not to microsoft and probably not very much)
    but also ridding the world of one potential windows user. As near win-win as you'll get in my opinion.

  152. cheap laptops by isbhod · · Score: 1

    check these guys out http://www.m-techlaptops.com/indexofnotebooks.htm they might have what you want without windows.

  153. Bahhh by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 2

    I will not purchase Windows!

    I can recommend many places you can "obtain" Windows without purchasing it.

  154. dell inspiron 2100 by zome · · Score: 1

    This small and light notebook works fine with Linux and it can be had for $700 on eBay. The only thing that doesn't work is MIDI

  155. But not cheaper (NT) by xmnemonic · · Score: 1

    data dies

  156. OH GOD NO!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a whole 3 cm!!!!! That's like half an inch!! I'll just DIE if my laptop is 3 cm larger on 2 sides than my friends!! What am I going to do?????

    1. Re:OH GOD NO!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude...not quite.

      3cm is 1.18 inches...

  157. Re:Knoppix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A LITTLE offtopic? ...

  158. Desknotes by kriston · · Score: 1

    Speaking of saving money on the "MS tax" and other things you wouldn't use, there is a new class of portable computer that I've been waiting for that's finally here. It's called the Desknote and it is designed to be user-configurable and user-upgradeable, and doesn't come with a battery. Some of them don't even come with screens, which make an ideal portatop when moving from home office to remote office. It can be ordered barebone-style or complete. Just search google or Yahoo shopping for "Desknote" and you'll find them.

    Kris

    --

    Kriston

  159. Dell X200 by ctar · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one has mentioned this laptop...I have been considering it for a while. It's beautiful, light, and sturdy. I've had a chance to ogle it in the store a few times, and I think it is the most compact laptop you can find without going the way of the half or quarter sized screens (a la libretto or the new sony palmtop that runs XP)

    It is lighter, and thinner than equivalent Sony's, and much cheaper. Dell's recommended retail is $1599, but you can get the price down a little, and even buy refurbished for much less. I don't think you can get this much for so little anywhere else.

    Yes, it does come with Microsoft tax, but I think if you wanted to, you could get it pre-installed with Linux. I seem to remember a hidden page on Dell's website that talks about getting a corporate account, and requesting custom installs of OS's, including Linux on laptops. (even though they don't offer this as an option on the regular consumer/home office links)

    But, I bet you end up paying more for this in the end anyways. (especially if you just order one)

    I have also been very tempted to go Apple, but they really are beasts. They're laptops, not notebooks. (although dvd-ram on the go is pretty sweet)

    The Dell X200 is about the size of 2 wired magazines, and weighs almost as little (2.8 lbs).

    Also, it has a 'Mini-PCI' slot, which can accomodate a wireless LAN card. (Is Mini-PCI standard now?)

    1. Re:Dell X200 by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Also, it has a 'Mini-PCI' slot, which can accomodate a wireless LAN card. (Is Mini-PCI standard now?)


      It's what Apple's using on the new powerbooks for their combo 802.11g/bluetooth cards..

    2. Re:Dell X200 by cplcap · · Score: 1

      I just got one of these shiny new babies. Decently fast, really slim and light, and I'm averaging close to 4.5 hours per battery - more if I enable power save features. Works great with RedHat 8.0, and I didn't have to pay the M$ tax.
      My advice: Configure it on the website, then instead of ordering through the website, call the 1-800 number at the bottom of the page. They recently went through a pissing contest with M$ about not selling machines without an OS preinstalled, so I got mine with DR-DOS installed. All you have to do is ask nicely.
      I don't think their Linux support is what it once was; but even so, I'm really picky about disk slicing and minimizing installed packages, so the few Dells I got in the past from Dell I reloaded anyway.

      --
      "If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat." -Sun Tzu
    3. Re:Dell X200 by ctar · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah!? What did it save you? ($'s) I may have to think more seriously about getting one...Do all your devices work fine?

  160. ASUS Laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I was able to purchase a ASUS laptop through a small supplier with no OS installed. I then ran linux on it :)

    It seems that ASUS laptops can be bought without an OS. Hope this helps

  161. Another solution... by the_bikeman · · Score: 0

    Atmospheric Computing (www.atmospheric.biz) also sells laptops with no OS installed. They'll even install and configure Linux for you free of charge.

  162. Sharp Actius series, notebook review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I highly recommend Sharp's Actius line (Mebius in Japan). They are fairly affordable ($1700 for a UM32W), are powerful with a real PIII 1 ghz, and have a true battery life of about 8 hours with extended life battery. And you can buy these at Circuit City now and get their good extended warranty. I'm not sure about Linux compatability, but the main issue here is ACPI support which is still a little spotty with Linux.

    Basically, if you buy a real laptop like you're describing it's going to use ACPI for power management and you're going to have to do some patching or use beta kernels to get that support in Linux.

    I've done extensive research on ultra mobile laptops and Sharp seems to have done it best. Research for my own purchase that was a Sharp, not in any professional capacity that is.

    1. Dell, Gateway, Compaq, HP don't understand ultramobile. Their latest models are no good. Either over weight, have poor battery life, or are simply not competitive design wise (brick-sized AC adapter, etc).

    1.5 Sony doesn't really have a good ultra-light laptop. They have a SlimTop, but that's over 4 lbs and gets bad battery life. It's also horribly overpriced and constructed of plastic. They uttery stupid picture book is horribly over priced, performs poorly, and is much better replaced by a Fujitsu P2000 which offers much more for much less money (and an internal drive for free). You could buy a 6 megapixel digicam with the money you save and still have some left for a nice notebook case.

    2. Toshiba's Protege 2000 series is good but costs a good $600-$700 more for the exact same laptop from Sharp. On top of that Toshiba's have had a poor track record with maintenence and with class action suits for falsifying specs. Also the Toshiba has horrid battery life, at only about 5 hours with the extended life battery compared to the Sharp UM32W's 8 hours.

    3. IBM X series is the creme de la creme of laptops. It's slightly heavier because it's actually a 2 spindle system, but you can swap out the cdrom for another battery to get "10 hours" of battery life, so they claim. You also get that trademark IBM keyboard, which is really important since laptops of this size generally don't have the thickness to get highly tactile keyboard in there. The downside to the IBM X series is the first-born premium you'll have to pay to get it.

    4. Fujitsu has a good laptop in the P2000 series. It'll give you the dvd/cdrw combo drive or a modular extra battery, and I can always see situations for either. It's also very affordable at around $1500 base. One major problem is screen size. Most of the other notebooks I mentioned have a full height 12.1" screen. The Fujitsu has "widescreen" 10.4" screen, which basically means you're getting about and 8" worth of screen real estate. I'm also suspicious of its less-than-full-size keyboard which can get cramped in the ultra-mobile weight class. The final blow to this otherwise good laptop is its poor performing Crusoe 933mhz chip. In benchmarks the Crusoe has generally offered little extra battery life (since most power is consumed by spindles or the screen and hardly any in the processor) with a NOTICABLE drop in performance.

    5. In America Panasonic only releases its "ToughBook" line of laptops, which basically conforms to more stringent shock absorbancy standards. The new-er ToughBook T1 is full featured, fantastic, small, good battery, etc. I particularly like the SD memory card slot so you don't have to fiddle with cables and draining your MP3/digicam battery life to transfer songs/images. But this is super premium priced at about $2500 base. For the extra price you'll get a generally well designed laptop that supposedly can withstand a good drop. Not something I'd ever try after paying that much for it.

    6. Finally, the Sharp. It has a real PIII ULV processor, looooong battery life (8 hours with a single extended life battery), and very good performance against similarly configured laptops. It also costs much less than the nearly identical Toshiba ($1700 vs $2400). It also has a pretty good keyboard that offers a full 3 mm key travel (distance the key goes down when you press it, more means more tactile) instead of a typica 1.7mm or less of every other notebook I've mentioned. Finally, it's well constructed mangesium allow casing with a bang-up industrial design. I especially like that it's the lightest, SMALLEST AC adapter I've seen (3.5" x 2" x 1"), which adds to the travel weight tremendously with laptops like Dell makes.

    For my considerations, I was most interested in 3 things. 1) Size/weight. 2) Battery life. This first two criteria generally favored 1 spindle machines with an external cdrom. I never need a cdrom on the road, and if I did then you'd have to consider carrying all those cds with you where you go. I just use ethernet and pull stuff off a remote machine. 3) Keyboard quality.

    The size had to be under 1" thick. The Sharp and Toshiba are about 0.7" thick. It had to weigh around 3 lbs. Most of these were under 3, the Sharp being 3.0 with a little added for the extended life battery. The Toshiba and the Fujitsu B series (touch screen) had horrible battery life, only getting around 4-5 hours with the extended battery. Sharp gets 8 on a single extended life battery. The Fujitsu and IBM use an extra modular bay battery plus an extended life battery to break into the 10 hour range. Finally the keyboard. Most of these offer a nearly full-size keyboard, the Sharp offering the best key travel. The IBM the best construction. Take into account features such as USB 2.0, firewire, 802.11b, etc and then the price, and the Sharp wins easily.

    Things not considered were obviously game performance and other bullshit you would be stupid to try and do in a laptop. The best video card for a laptop is the Radeon 9000 mobile, which is barely as good as a Geforce2 from 3 years ago.

    Finally, all of these laptops have Windows. These are the good ultralights. You won't find any others and they certainly won't have Linux preinstalled. Get over it. The closest thing you're going to get is the larger clam-shell Sharp Zaurus.

    1. Re:Sharp Actius series, notebook review by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      For my considerations, I was most interested in 3 things. 1) Size/weight. 2) Battery life. This first two criteria generally favored 1 spindle machines with an external cdrom. I never need a cdrom on the road, and if I did then you'd have to consider carrying all those cds with you where you go. I just use ethernet and pull stuff off a remote machine. 3) Keyboard quality.


      I'm also interested in those three things. Try looking into getting a PDA of some sort that'll accept a real keyboard (like a Happy Hacking one, those look beautiful, though I don't know how they feel).
  163. Buy used by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    >catch is if you want to buy from them you're going to need to order in bulk just like Dell do.

    Naww, just buy it used. If the submitter is so hot to make a political statement then buy it used. The MS tax has already been paid. MS is not going to make more money from ebay. The end result is the same. MS makes zero more dollars this way.

  164. Terra Soft Solutions by waxcrash · · Score: 1

    http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com

    They sell Apple hardware with Yellow Dog installed.

  165. No MS tax is possible! by Yonder+Way · · Score: 0

    There is an obscure manufacturer of SPARC-based notebooks going by the name of Tadpole. These are marketed as portable Solaris systems but I'd bet some flavor of Linux will run on these (Aurora Linux comes to mind).

  166. Which postas has the mostest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First Post Bitches

  167. Powerbooks only have a single pointer button by addikt10 · · Score: 1

    If you are serious about using this laptop for linux (or any X based interface), keep in mind that the Powerbook pointer only has a single button.

    Just as I was about to purchase one myself (um, the 17" though), I came to my senses. My G4 desktop has a USB optical mouse with scroll, etc. and even the OSX portion uses the extra buttons, for the most part, but being stuck with a single button pointer while mobile would be hell.

    1. Re:Powerbooks only have a single pointer button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use the modifier keys. It's really quite simple.

      I do agree with you that Apple should offer more built-in buttons since this is by no means a beginner's laptop, but the whole one button thing has been their trademark for almost 20 years.

    2. Re:Powerbooks only have a single pointer button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe at first if you're used to it...Interestingly, I despise multi button mice. I think it all just depends on perspective/comfort. Anyways, I find modifier keys work just fine. Also, the only multibutton mouse I've seen that I liked it Microsofts, unfortunately for them I will not buy anything from them.

    3. Re:Powerbooks only have a single pointer button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> the whole one button thing has been their trademark for almost 20 years.

      For *over* 20 years, if you count the Lisa!

    4. Re:Powerbooks only have a single pointer button by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      here's a kernel patch to enable ctrl-click.

      --
      blah
  168. the dumb answer... by nehril · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Must have USB and Firewire, built-in ethernet, and 802.11b support ... Small is important, lightweight is important, long battery life is important. I don't care about screen size ... Performance isn't a major concern... don't play games ... will not pay for windows

    uh, get an ibook? oh wait...

    seriously, ibook + osx + fink + apple X11 == everything you want in a linux laptop, except for the ugly fonts. If you're dying for more speed get the new 12" G4 Powerbook (~$1700), which is just like the ibook only smaller in every dimension, and faster.

    why exactly does your current ibook fail your requirements, anyway?

    1. Re:the dumb answer... by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      You can install linux on an ibook, after all. Are you adverse to an Apple tax as well though?

      --
      Jeremy
    2. Re:the dumb answer... by JPriest · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can get a new Apple with Yellow Dog Linux preinstalled.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:the dumb answer... by defile · · Score: 2, Interesting

      seriously, ibook + osx + fink + apple X11 == everything you want in a linux laptop, except for the ugly fonts. If you're dying for more speed get the new 12" G4 Powerbook (~$1700), which is just like the ibook only smaller in every dimension, and faster.

      OSX is not a Linux replacement. Although it may be a good Windows replacement. If someone specifically asks for Linux, chances are they're not interested in what OSX has to offer.

    4. Re:the dumb answer... by ichimunki · · Score: 3, Informative

      While it's nice that YDL comes on the machine as a gimme, the machines cost the exact same amount as that same machine at Apple without YDL. Plus, the machines come with OS X on them. So you are still paying an "Apple tax" (which admittedly isn't anywhere as invasive as the MS tax-- since MS strongarmed 3rd party vendors into paying for a MS Windows license on every machine, while Apple simply refuses to sell its own hardware without bundling its OS).

      So yes, if you plan to run YDL, get your machine through TerraSoft. But my personal thought is that YDL is one of the least appealing Linux distros you'll find. Debian has more recent versions of some packages (my personal grudge: Ruby -- YDL has this at 1.6.4, whereas everyone else has this at 1.6.7+). YDL also has a much slimmer list of available packages than most distros. Gentoo has a perfectly usable PPC distribution for those that truly desire the full Linux experience.

      Personally I can't imagine purchasing Apple hardware just to run Linux. If you allow non-Free software on your system, you'll be continually disappointed by which things are not available as binaries for your PPC-based system. Of course, if you are okay with non-Free software, you might be just as happy running OS X. But if you are a hardcore Linux fan or Free Software zealot, Apple hardware is no better than buying any old Windows system in terms of the extra expense.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    5. Re:the dumb answer... by a7244270 · · Score: 1

      OSX is not a Linux replacement. Although it may be a good Windows replacement. If someone specifically asks for Linux, chances are they're not interested in what OSX has to offer.

      what people call "linux" is a combination of a kernel and a bunch of applications.

      osx will run everything except the kernel itself, so I am not sure I understand what you are trying to say.

      Do you have any examples of what specifically will not run on osx ?

      Not flaming you, just curious...

    6. Re:the dumb answer... by Ledskof · · Score: 1

      Linux is also the approach to an operating environment, the Linux sprung OSS projects, and all of the communities built around it all. That is basically what I got out of his post. I'm not interested in any kind of apple community because it's closed off.

      On the other hand, if all you care about are the applications that work in just about any UNIX environment, why not at least stick with an OS that isn't controlled by a company who also controls the hardware it runs on?

      I'd only consider OSX in this case (if I was so inclined) because of the obvious reasons (designed for the architecture etc).

      --
      This is my sig. The post is over.
    7. Re:the dumb answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSX is not a Linux replacement

      Yeah! who wants to type sudo all the time!!!

    8. Re:the dumb answer... by a7244270 · · Score: 1

      Ah. OK. now I understand. Your aversion to the closed Apple community is completely understandable and valid. You wouldn't happen to be RMS in disguise would you ? :P

      I'd like to present a different viewpoint - that there is nothing wrong with a company controlling the hardware as long as it works.

      Take for example the software that runs on a CD player. Its controlled by the manufacturer that made the hardware. You can't add or change anything, but guess what - as long as you can stop, play, advance, rewind and eject, who cares is you can't change anything ?

      I used to be an linux zealot, and I really liked the fact that I could rebuild anything I didn't like in linux. In fact, I used to do it all the time. But in the last 5 years or so, I haven't modified a single line of code in any linux distro, mainly because the linux tools and applications are getting better, and I don't _need_ to patch them to get them to work right for me.

      Linux as a desktop solution has made some wonderful advances, but its nowhere near as integrated as the osX environment is - remember that osX is currently controlled by a company that has a vested interest in having all the tools interoperate and work well together, which is not true for linux.

      Linux might be a valid desktop replacement a few years from now, but not yet. At least not for me anyway - too many of the apps I need are either windows or unix specific. Over the years I've had dual boot machines, multiple machines connected via a KVM, cygwin, remote access via exceed, you name it, I've tried it. I find osX to be a cleaner and cheaper solution.

      The notebook hardware is pretty damm cool too. :)

    9. Re:the dumb answer... by $nyper · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I am a long time Linux user on the server side but never been bold enough to make the desktop switch. I still run Windows at the house for my desktop partially because I support a large windows desktop environement at the office... (INSERT SELF FLAME HERE). However, for the first time yestreday I started looking into a Mac laptop with OSX installed. I found the following major differnce in my personnal and humble opinion of the iBook and PowerBook.

      The primary difference I saw was that compared to the PowerBook the iBook has the physical appearance of a fragile childs toy. It has a cheesy little loose key, plastic keyboard. I swear every time I tapped a key I thought it was going to come off in my hand. It (iBook) was also much heavier (comparing 12" iBook to 12" PowerBook).

      But in the words of Austin Powers the 12" PowerBook is a "Sexy Beast, Baby!" I loved it, the thing was light, fast, and the UNIX command line functions including VI kicked major ass. Never thought I would say I liked VI but I have decided over the years that I like it!!! If I made the switch and then still needed to operate a Windows Server for work I could use VNC which works on MAC OSX.

      Anyway those were just a couple of my observations. I think that the biggest selling point for a Mac is to get a PowerBook into someones hand and let them use it a few minutes. You might find yourself foaming at the mouth as I found myself. I had a seriously hard time trying to convince myself that I did not need to walk out of my local Fry's yesterday with a 12" Powerbook. God! I hate Fry's and their little Mac Center, it is going to end up costing $1700 for 12" PowerBook sometime very soon. Will power fading... must fight urge to spend money!!!!!

      --
      "Help me Obi-/.-Kenobi,your my only hope!" -$
    10. Re:the dumb answer... by Ledskof · · Score: 1

      I'd hate to think that OSX was designed to be as static and simple as something with pushbutton-results like a CD player. I guess you were just making an example of a solid operating system. I don't think that was a valid analogy though given the simplicity of a CD player's software, and the bad tangents created comparing a computer to a CD player.

      You actually seem to make it clear why you are interested in OSX and not Linux though; because you expect the results that OSX gives, not the results that Linux gives. Some people want what Linux has. I disagree with you and the other people who are saying that Linux isn't ready for the desktop. I've been using Linux on my desktop since 95. It's my favorite and best suited desktop environment. It might not be right for you, but saying that it isn't right for everyone is too generalizing. Are you talking about what is the best environment for the average user who isn't interested in computers for anything beyond consuming media?

      So are you honestly trying to say that everyone should be more interested in OSX than Linux?
      If so... you need to rethink that one.

      I'm interested in hearing some more about OSX being a cheaper solution than Linux. If you feel like writing :)

      --
      This is my sig. The post is over.
    11. Re:the dumb answer... by defile · · Score: 1

      what people call "linux" is a combination of a kernel and a bunch of applications.

      osx will run everything except the kernel itself, so I am not sure I understand what you are trying to say.

      So will Solaris. But I don't run that either.

    12. Re:the dumb answer... by a7244270 · · Score: 1

      Well, I didn't say that everyone should be more interested in osX than linux, just that its more interesting to me. Linux also makes a great desktop, just not for me.

      I'm a programmer, I do embedded, client side, and server side programming. For the embedded, I need a gcc crosscompiler and a serial port. I can do that anywhere. For the client side stuff, I started off with Motif, then went to Swing, then MFC, and I'm probably going to switch to wxWindows which theoretically should run anywhere. (crosses fingers).

      For web development, depending on the customer, I need apache/jsp/php/servlets and typically postgresql or mysql. I can do this work on a windows machine, but I prefer to do it on a linux box as 99.9% of the time the deployment server is also a unix box, and to be honest getting this stuff running on a windows box is extremely tedious.

      But here's the kicker - for web work I also need dreamweaver + illustator + photoshop. For these apps I need either windows or osx, so I need two machines. Dual boot is absolutely not an option.

      At home I have two machines hooked up via KVM - one is my test server, and the other I run my applications on. For travelling, the only possible option is to lug around two laptops and a hub, which is no fun.

      I've been messing with an iBook recently, and I think that the next time I'm due to upgrade my hardware (which should be this year), more than likely I will pick up one of the new powerbooks and this will become my desktop and travel computer.

      Macs laptops cost a little more than intel hardware, and mac desktops cost a lot more, but remember that I am replacing two machines with one, hence my statements that for me, macs are cheaper.

      Also, this line gets thrown around a lot, but I'll use it again "linux is free if your time is worthless". Every hour I spend dicking with linux trying to get something to work, is an hour that I could be billing a customer, or working on one of my myriad unfinished projects. Or better yet away from a computer :)

    13. Re:the dumb answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually one only types sudo for root access and that is rarely needed. But if you must, you could type sudo -s which will drop you into a full root shell. Or you could actually turn on the root account then just type su and the root password. It's off by default because 99% of the normal Apple user world will never touch root access.

      Me, I use "sudo -s" rather than to turn on full root access. I rather like having root disabled.

    14. Re:the dumb answer... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      OSX is not a Linux replacement. Although it may be a good Windows replacement. If someone specifically asks for Linux, chances are they're not interested in what OSX has to offer.

      The only significant difference is ideological. If you're going to buy a new laptop, you have three choices: 1. buy one with Windows, 2. buy one with OS X, 3. buy one from a niche player who installs a free OS like Linux (or GNU/Linux, if you must) or FreeBSD, like Emperor Linux (http://www.emperorlinux.com/), in order of increasing preference. Why? Because given MS and Apple, Apple is the lesser of two evils, and every win for Apple against MS is a win for Unix against Windows, and so is better for Linux than a Windows win would be.

      Given the quality of the Apple hardware, I'd suggest getting the Apple. Dual-booting an Apple is a dream.

    15. Re:the dumb answer... by yorkmork · · Score: 1

      What about a laptop that is does NOT have an AMD/Intel processor and can do 1600x1200. These processors eat way too much power and produce way too much heat. Can't find a laptop that does it, crusoe, and G4 don't do it.

    16. Re:the dumb answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if you want to shuffle tracks?

      Believe it or not, some people like to tinker with hardware. That's how Linux started.

    17. Re:the dumb answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but solaris has actually a decent, performant unix kernel. While gcc has been ported to os x, so you can compile many apps to run on it, it still isn't a *real* unix when it comes down to things like performance, scheduling, multi-user, threading, etc. The type of things that Linux is still struggling with.

    18. Re:the dumb answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, it's kind of odd. My 14" iBook has one of the nicest laptop keyboards I've ever used. I don't like the 12" PowerBook's keyboard at all. The one I tried at my local Apple Store had a keyboard so smooth that my fingers kept slipping and hitting wrong keys. My iBook's keyboard has just a bit of texture and typing is much nicer on it. As for build quality, my iBook feels bulletproof. No body flex, tight fit of the parts, all around, very high quality. The only thing that seems odd to me is the lid clasp (Which I believe is shared with the PB), which will only properly engage if you close the lid firmly (almost slamming it). It was a bit of a transition from my old WallStreet PB G3, which I always closed gently. I suppose the 12" iBook may have a poorer build quality. I never even considered one as I don't like really small laptops. I'm a big guy with big hands. I need a bigger laptop. I don't mind the weight at all. Positively light compaired to my old WS!

    19. Re:the dumb answer... by insanechemist · · Score: 1

      Well the keyboard on the iBook I'm using isn't cheap - and you won't notice that great of a speed difference between the 12" powerbook and iBook unless you're running something like Photoshop.

      BTW don't use VNC with your windows server - its a nice piece of software, but terminal services is MUCH faster and it gives you more connection options (i.e web or rdc software). I use it to admin an exchange server and the OSX native remote desktop connection software from M$ is actually quite nice.

    20. Re:the dumb answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic...

      Creeps me out...

      I may not be making a great deal of $$$, but damn I like tweaking code and hardware and the point of having $$$ is to forget about what time is worth and hack.

    21. Re:the dumb answer... by erostratus · · Score: 1

      One other general note...the 12" iBook is less than 5 oz heaver than the 12" PowerBook. Yes, that is a difference, but certainly not much heavier. I use both on a daily basis, and the PowerBook would be a better fit for a developer *only* if your compilers are optimized for the AltiVec instructions on a G4. Just my 2 cents.

    22. Re:the dumb answer... by a7244270 · · Score: 1

      something happened, and my reply didn't show up under yours so you probably didn't get notification. heres the "bump"

  169. The easy way by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

    Here's the catch: I will not purchase Windows!

    So find the model you want and look for it on eBay or some other outlet for used hardware.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  170. CNET Notebook section by xmnemonic · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you've decided to acquiesce on the "no-Windows" stance, I'd suggest looking at the CNET Notebook section for info. There are sections are for value as well as thin and light notebooks, among others, and looking through those sections is a lot quicker than navigating through the separate laptop sections on each manufacturer's website.

    My take on notebooks (currently); wait. Banias is around the corner (March 12 last I heard) bringing +3 hour battery time coupled with excellent performance (it's easy to find slower laptops with significantly longer battery times though). Cost will be an issue (if you're looking at sub-$1500), so I'd suggest waiting even longer after Banias. Having performance, price and portability all in one laptop is about to become possible though; all you need to do is hold off from purchasing for a bit more.

  171. ThinkPad 600E by intermodal · · Score: 1

    Despite their battery problems as stated in a previoud article (which I have yet to see, as mine only drains heavily when using my wirelss NIC), from what I have seen there are a lot of ThinkPad 600* reconditions coming back to IBM and appear in new condition if the one I purchased on ubid.com is any indication. With my 600E 400MHz Pentium II Mobile, I just pulled the stock RAM (32MB), toss in a pair of 128's, add that in with the 32 built into the mobo, and it runs great.

    or even better, go Apple. I have heard great things about their battery life, and their hardware is really top notch as far as self-compatibility goes. The biggest reason I went IBM: good deal on the recondition, and their leanings towards promoting linux appears to have inspired them to provide drivers for said operating system. (not on the standard support page, but on their search system, you can find at least plenty of info...I didn't need it. it was all pretty much autodetect.)

    I will of course grant that it came with Win98SE, but it was paid for years ago and will not be supporting Microsoft any more than the AOL cds you get in the mail and use as cup coasters support AOL.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  172. alternative ideas by Jon_E · · Score: 1

    It looks like antelope is doing something different w/ their MCC stuff from IBM - split the display and input device out and save on weight - would be a nice setup with a monocle and a flexi-keyboard .. or you could try the SparcBooks which are unfortunately a little heavy (3.5kg) .. if it's size you're after - I'd look to the Asian market trends which tend to value the smaller size much more than the fat fingered lazy Americans and Europeans - the Sharp Zaurus PDA comes to mind there, and even smaller vaios only available on the japanese market (i started using a U1 a while back and love it) .. for durability - take a look at what the US gov't is doing for the military - there's a big push away from MS there and good luck! I think the real battle is away from the X86 instruction set - the majority of MS code is too embedded on this dependency!

  173. Walmwart comps by dh003i · · Score: 1

    Get a Walmart computer with Lindows on it. Lindows is basically Debian Linux with a friendly GUI installed on top. You'll have to reconfigure it manually, as it comes with "root" as the default login (not good). But, if you know anything about Linux, shouldn't be hard to add an account and login under that.

    1. Re:Walmwart comps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I bought two of them from Tigerdirect. They came with a floppy drive (didn't need them, as I have spares, and don't use them anyway, other floppies available on network), lan card, and otherwise are about the same spec as the walmart, although mine have 1.3 Ghz Durons, and I think the Walmart boxes have the 800 or 900 Transmeta chips (which I would have preferred due to their lower power consumption).

      The two that I bought were sold as Lindows computers, so I booted one up just to see what it looked like, but I didn't even bother to check out click and run, or other major features. I put in a CD of my favorite distro, and wiped the original Lindows install.

      The computers work great, and I got two of them for under $250 a piece. The value is unbelievable. I have one serving web sites with Apache, and the other is running bind for my network and as a slave for a friend's network, and mysql for all the Apache boxes on the network, and is setup to take over if any of the other Apache boxes fail.

      Tigerdirect doesn't show the boxes I bought in their latest catalog. Their catalogs come out every couple of weeks. The Lindows boxes appeared in two issues. In the latest issue, the Lindows box now includes a CD-RW drive instead of CD-Rom, and has a slightly larger hard drive (although my boxes were advertised as 10 Gig, and I got about 14 Gig out of them when I repartioned them). The new Lindows box is also more expensive, about $300 if I remember correctly. They must have sold so many of the Lindows boxes at the original price because I know a business that ordered dozens of them, and someone else who ordered a few. My local linux group has also standardized on them as well.

      One more tip. It appears that either the computer manufacturer or the Lindows distributor is configuring the boxes to make it difficult to install another distribution. I forget what I had to do, but I had difficulty in getting into the bios (you have to hold delete I believe, but when I tried dozens of reboots and holding delete, it would still boot into Lindows), and once in, after setting the CD-Rom to be the first boot device and installing a different linux distro CD into the drive, Lindows would still boot. I forgot what I did, but it is possible to do it. They just made it harder I guess to discourage the masses from wiping Lindows. I'd say that Lindows is counting on income from the click and run download subscription, and I'll bet they are kicking some share of the profits back to the hardware manufacturers to subsidize the boxes.

  174. No Battery by TheTwoBest · · Score: 1

    Errr, before you get all excited. This model has no internal battery, and if you want an external battery you have to pay more.

  175. Omnibook 500 by jchristopher · · Score: 1

    Definitely check out the HP Omnibook 5x0 series. Great, lightweight machine. Can't help you with the Windows license issue though.

  176. Japan Rush by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 2, Informative

    japanrush.com has nice slick sony viaos imported from japan and they CHARGE EXTRA for windows.

    So don't pay!

    --


    "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
  177. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say get the iBook if you're so antimicrosoft. Then you have the benefit of being able to run OS X, -or- linux -or- both, and you're giving money to an enemy of Microsoft. Your enemies enemy is your friend right? And those iBooks are slick, my gf has one, its really nice.

  178. Linux on Powerbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a couple of serious problems with using Linux on a 12" Powerbook.

    The worst is that it uses an NVidia graphics chipset. NVidia doesn't release drivers for Linux running on PowerPC hardware, so OpenGL won't work. The larger Powerbooks use nice Radeon chips, but they weigh quite a big more and are far more expensive.

    There's another problem that people laugh about, but which really is a problem: They only have one mouse button. I now have a Vaio R505G, which has three buttons... the middle is a mouse wheel. One mouse button is insufficient for me to conveniently use a desktop. I know a few Mac people who claim that it is easy to compensate for only having one, but I never have.

    Most Linux software is developed and tested primarily on x86 hardware. This sucks, but that's the way it is. So, if you have a need for any particularly cutting edge tools, they'll often work best on an x86 laptop. Much more seriously for me, Matlab is not available for Linux on PowerPC cpus. (Unless that has changed recently.)

    Anyway, the NVidia chipset is the killer. If Sony's customer support didn't suck so much ass, and if it didn't come with Windows, I'd recommend Sony R505Gs to everyone.

    They cost a lot.

    1. Re:Linux on Powerbooks by VValdo · · Score: 1

      There's another problem that people laugh about, but which really is a problem: They only have one mouse button. I now have a Vaio R505G, which has three buttons... the middle is a mouse wheel. One mouse button is insufficient for me to conveniently use a desktop. I know a few Mac people who claim that it is easy to compensate for only having one, but I never have.

      Why not just plug in an intellimouse?

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Linux on Powerbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's one more think to carry. With the Vaio, I have an extremely comfortable three button mouse built right into the laptop.

      Plus, who wants to use an external mouse on an airplane, or while giving a speech at a conference?

    3. Re:Linux on Powerbooks by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
      Why not just plug in an intellimouse?

      Why not put enough mouse buttons on the thing in the first place? Even most Mac OS X users replace the single-button mouse with a triple.

      I don't know about you, but I don't relish the idea of an external mouse most places you'd use a laptop. "Hey, could you drop down your beverage tray? I'm out of space, and I need to mouse..." "Damnit, why do they always build these presentation podiums at an angle!?" "Hold on, driver! Hold the bus! I've got to wind up my mouse!" "Why does cafeteria/Starbucks grime always make the mouse skip?"

      "One mouse button ought to be enough for anybody." -- Steve Jobs

    4. Re:Linux on Powerbooks by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      Even most Mac OS X users replace the single-button mouse with a triple.

      Wow, it just must be a coincidence that as an IT manager in a mostly-Mac university department I've never seen even one three-button mouse in use under OSX! Hell, I don't even use one, and I'm an X11 user from way back ...

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  179. Can any Linux user.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    view the video clips from www.feedroom.com

  180. Also, why NOT apple ibook/powerbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I almost forgot to mention my views on ibook/powerbook.

    Both the ibook and powerbook weigh about 5 lbs (4.3 lbs for 12.1" powerbook and 7 lbs for the 17.1"). They also offer very poor battery life, at about 3.5-4 hours run time. In addition to that, the ibook keyboard is very shallow and poor. That fails all 3 of my criteria: size/weight, battery life, keyboard.

    Add the fact the ibook/powerbook are overpriced because Apple has a monopoly on its hardware and you've got a reason not to buy Apple.

    In their defense, the PowerBook is a good desktop replacement, and probably my choice if I wanted a DVD-RW. It really does have a full feature set in a relatively slim case.

    But the ibook is just cheap components that give you a slower laptop that is oversized for its capability, weighs far too much (5 lbs for their "lightweight" !??!?!), and has an equivalent battery life to a much fuller featured powerbook like the 15" (considering the ibook only has a 12.1"!!!). Only get an ibook if you're a fool, basically. You can get overall better hardware from the x86 camp for much less money if that's your reasoning for even considering that junk.

  181. Is it really worth it? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Consider this. What is your hourly rate? Ok multiply it times the number of hours you've spent trying to get around the "windows tax" well, congratulations, you've lost money in the long run. Now-a-days the major OEMs get keyed copies of Windows that only work on their brand. So really your only option would be to attempt to sell it as an unactivated copy for Dells only or whatever brand you bought. Why buy a non-major brand laptop that has questionable support under linux, when you can buy a major brand that can be very well supported by the community?

    One other option, in the Dallas area there is a free computer magazine that you can find at most computer stores or book stores that features local computer store ads. I've seen many BTO laptops in there. You'd have an easier time convincing a smaller company to dump windows for a sale anyway.

    1. Re:Is it really worth it? by nagora · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ok multiply it times the number of hours you've spent trying to get around the "windows tax" well, congratulations, you've lost money in the long run.

      Give me fifty quid or I'll cut your throat. Multiply your hourly rate by the time taken up with finding the police, going to court, and talking to your lawyer, congratulations, you've lost money in the long run.

      Get it?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  182. Want to know how far Apple has come? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who would of thought that over half the people answering this question suggested iBooks or Powerbooks?

    Think this would of happened 2 years ago?

    1. Re:Want to know how far Apple has come? by Forgotten · · Score: 1

      They have, but only in notebooks. If it was a desktop question there'd be barely any mention of Apple. The iMac is a nice machine but nowhere near the price-for-features win that the iBook especially is. And I can't understand this.

      I like Macs and I like notebooks (I'm typing this on an older Powerbook). But right now, Apple's winning position in notebooks is really more about everyone else's losing position - PC notebook hardware is sucky, and Windows (or Linux or FreeBSD) is even more sucky. Winning by your competitors' mistakes is not a very secure way to stay ahead.

      I still don't understand why Apple can't offer the iMac (or another flat-panel desktop machine) in a more compelling, price-competitive way.

    2. Re:Want to know how far Apple has come? by Forgotten · · Score: 1

      btw I meant that "Windows (or Linux of FreeBSD) is even more sucky on a notebook" (well, Windows is sucky anyway). GUI usability issues become more pronounced on notebooks, hence the distinction.

    3. Re:Want to know how far Apple has come? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go finish your homework, then go clean your room. Your post shows your age. And you are spending far to much time in the bathroom!

    4. Re:Want to know how far Apple has come? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It suggests to me that this site has been taken over by 'image' freaks, and is no longer a geek site.

      Lots of old time geeks decided by the year 1986 that they would never, ever, again buy an Apple product.

    5. Re:Want to know how far Apple has come? by Draoi · · Score: 1
      Lots of old time geeks decided by the year 1986 that they would never, ever, again buy an Apple product

      Sure, but never is a long time. 1986 is almost twenty years ago - a lot has happened since then.

      Besides, I didn't know that 'image' and 'geek' were mutually exclusive - just look at how companies like alienware are doing ...

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    6. Re:Want to know how far Apple has come? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1
      Lots of old time geeks decided by the year 1986 that they would never, ever, again buy an Apple product.
      I was that way, until OS X came out. Think about it -- command line interfaces (CLIs) are being avoided by MS now, while Apple is endorsing them in their OS. What a strange world we live in! :^)

      I do admit that using Torx screws on a computer case is downright silly though. Give me Robertson or Philips!
    7. Re:Want to know how far Apple has come? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I do admit that using Torx screws on a computer case is downright silly though. Give me Robertson or Philips!
      I was that way, until I managed to mangle a philips head screw and was unable to open a computer case witout drilling the screw out.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Want to know how far Apple has come? by call+-151 · · Score: 1
      Apple has been making very nice laptop hardware for a while and it's had decent Linux/Unix available with LinuxPPC, YellowDog and Debian for a while. Of course, now with OS X at a pretty refined stage, an order of magnitude (or two) more people are running Unix/Linux on their Powerbooks now. But there have been advocates of Powerbooks for Linux laptops on Slashdot for a while. Witness: As someone who was using and contributing to LinuxPPC on my 1997 Powerbook, it's great to see more widespread combination of excellent laptop hardware and the best available operating systems.
      --
      It's psychosomatic. You need a lobotomy. I'll get a saw.
    9. Re:Want to know how far Apple has come? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Geeks would not call 17 years "almost 20." For "almost," 5% tolerance is about the most that's acceptable.

      Back to your liberal arts school, child!

    10. Re:Want to know how far Apple has come? by Draoi · · Score: 1

      Who cares? 17 years is prehistory in computing terms. How many geeks thought Apple would have ever switched to BSD back then & that unix would eventually be touted as an OS for the masses? (at my age, being called 'child' - even by a poxy, anonymous troll such as yourself - is considered complimentary. Ta!)

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    11. Re:Want to know how far Apple has come? by laird · · Score: 1

      Apple earns its margins by innovative R&D that creates a more valuable product than the generic PC. Desktop PC's are commodities with no margin, so investing in R&D to make Mac's better (and they have to be better to sell at all) means that you have to pay more for desktop Mac's than desktop PC's. On the other hand, laptops all require R&D, so they all sell for a higher markup over raw costs, which means that Apple can invest in R&D and still sell a product that is not only better but cheaper than the PC manufacturers.

  183. Re:Knoppix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, chill out, he was just suggesting a way to make sure things work. I didn't see anything about 'AND MAKE SURE YOU USE KNOPPIX BECAUSE it 0wnZ 411 07H3r d1s7r0s!'

  184. Re: Apple *did* have the first touchpad by mfnickster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Half right, half wrong...

    Apple didn't invent it, they licensed it from George Gerpheide. Apple was the first to market a laptop with a touchpad.

    If you want a source for this tidbit, click away.

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  185. Asus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I opted for a Dell first. Couldn't get it without paying the MS tax. Contacted Dell. Got a reply which basically said: 'Up yours!'
    So I responded in kind and started looking elsewhere. In one of my favorite Dutch hardware stores I could buy an ASUS notebook without having to pay The Tax. Would save me 109 euro.

  186. Re:apple-World domination. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " It's called a power book.

    Yao and mini-me use 'em, why can't you?"

    Anytime I'm ready to take over the world I'll order one.

  187. arargh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You make me sick!! I'm sick of this. Grow up???? FUCK YOU!! No, you need to realize there's a damn good reason why people are against Microsoft!! How does "whining" about Microsoft's monopoly, cheap tactics and shitty operating system make me less of a man! Fuck you. It's poeple like you who should be shot in the head with a rifle. It's poeple like us who "whine" about Microsoft who believe in quality computing and take a stand against the bullshit they put everyone through. I hope your PC gets hacked into and you lose important files you piece of shit.

    1. Re:arargh! by andrewski · · Score: 1

      It would all be over too quickly with a rifle. I would use an old blunderbuss packed with jacks. At least let the poor fucker suffer for defending a multiple convicted felon out for no less than your very soul.

      Shame on you.

  188. you are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > also, there is the issue of wireless. ultralights (correct me if i'm wrong) usually don't have a pc-card slot. and pc-card wi-fi cards are battery HOGS.

    Two things. First, even a PDA has some sort of expansion card. If not a full PCMCIA, then at least a flash card slot that they make various hardware to fit. Any ultra portable will have PCMCIA, maybe the Apple ibook doesn't, but that's an Apple problem (airport, wtf!? just use a real pcmcia card that costs 1/2 as much).

    Second WiFi is a power hog, not just WiFi cards. If you've got dual antennae embedded in a PowerBook screen it's going to take tons of power just like a single antenna in a PCMCIA wifi card. This is what Intel is trying to address in their Centrino blah blah, or so their marketing department claims.

    So yeah, wireless eats power. But that's a problem when you're trying to make your laptop send 2.4ghz signals to an access point. Those waves of energy don't just make themselves!

  189. Tuxtops? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1
  190. Performance? by forevermore · · Score: 1
    I'm looking for PC notebook computers that outperform the iBook. .... Performance isn't a major concern

    I don't understand this. First, you say that you want it to outperform an iBook - which is a pretty beefy little machine - and then you say that performance isn't an issue.

    Honestly, Apple still makes the best laptops in the business, and they run linux just fine. (I've even heard of people hassling the apple store enough to get one shipped with no OS)

    --
    Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    1. Re:Performance? by Junta · · Score: 1

      iBook? Beefy? Umm.. I wouldn't say that. Typing from one right now. It is kinda a neat little machine (except too much cheap-ass plastic in its construction), but I would hardly call it beefy performance wise. I guess he means performance isn't *much* of an issue, an iBook can easily be unacceptable. There are quite a few video files that drop a lot of frames to keep up on an iBook, wheter in OSX or in Linux. And just trying to play a lot of the 3D games... painful.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  191. Not a problem because... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you think about it, the modifier key (ctrl) to do a "right click" is right by the trackpad on any Powerbook. So it's really easy to work with as it's really just about as easy to use as a second "mouse button"... easier in some ways because you only have one large mouse button to press so you can't miss and get the wrong one.

    When using an external keyboard it's more of a pain - but then you also usually have an external USB mouse with two buttons (which I do). I really don't find it annoying to switch between the two, and in fact more and more I find myself away from the dock and just using the computer wherever I am (since I have wireless almost every I sit around now).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not a problem because... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      What do you do when you need to do a CTRL+Right-click? Like when changing fonts in an xterm?

    2. Re:Not a problem because... by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Just hold down the ctrl key twice.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    3. Re:Not a problem because... by Fzz · · Score: 1
      On Apple's latest release, the modifier key for right button is the Apple key. The Middle button modifier is the Alt/Option key. So needing to do ctrl-click isn't an issue. Alt-click might be, but I don't recall ever needing to do this in 15 years of using X :-)

      - Fzz

  192. Re:It has to be said.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this dweebs here is bitch about Microsoft and Windows. Get a life loosers.

    Can't find someone who sells computers without Windows? - then open your own freaking company.

  193. Run Darwin and X by snStarter · · Score: 1

    Gee - this isn't hard - run Darwin and X Windows software.

    Sigs? We don't need no stinkin' sigs.

    1. Re:Run Darwin and X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the benefit of Darwin over the more developed and widely supported Linux kernel?

      Nothing, the GUI is the only reason to run it. Without the GUI and corporate apps, it's a dog.

  194. dynamism.com by evanbd · · Score: 1

    will happily sell you a Toshiba Libretto without windows on it, for $100 less than their published list price. They'll also put ISOs on the hard disk for you. I have an L1 I'm very happy with. Be warned, though, they are somewhat overpriced. They also sell other things small, light, and Japanese.

  195. make a statement- give to GNU and EFF by call+-151 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As has been pointed out, you pay a premium of $500-$1000 over commodity laptops for the privledge of not buying Windows. This stems from the different rates MS charges different size retailers. If you do buy a "Windows- free" machine from a Linux laptop specialist, probably they bought the laptops from HP or Toshiba and already paid their $15-50 to MS anyway, so it's not like you are keeping any money from going to MS.

    If you want to make a statement by spending an extra $500- $1000 just to not have Windows, fine. I suggest you can make a more effective statement by just getting the commodity laptop and giving the $500+ you save over an allegedy "Windows-free" machine to GNU, BSD, and/or EFF, depending upon the particular point you are trying to make.

    If you truly want to avoid money going to MS, just get an iBook ( or Powerbook if you can swing it.) Those are great, sturdy, well-arranged machines. Actually, I'm not sure how sturdy the Powerbooks are but the iBooks are unbelievable and really are made for 12-year olds as far as being tossed in backpacks and so on.

    --
    It's psychosomatic. You need a lobotomy. I'll get a saw.
    1. Re:make a statement- give to GNU and EFF by Alioth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Novatech in the UK sell PCs and laptops with no OS installed. They cost less than the PCs/laptops shipped with Windows - and they are sold for a very good price.

  196. Unique reason to choose iBook/Powerbook (really!) by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    One of the best features of the iBook/Powerbook that no-one seems to have mentioned is how very useful instant-on is in these things. When you close them, they sleep right away... and when you open them, you can type almost before you have the screen up.

    That might seem like a little thing but it turns out to be a HUGE benefit. You are concerned about battery life - if you have to wait 10-20 seconds for a laptop to wake up then you are less prone to close it. So having a laptop that wakes up right away means you can leave it shut when you don't need it! Not to mention the lack of annoyance at waiting for the laptop to be available all through the day.

    The most advantageous environment I've found for this feature is any kind of class or conference. I just bring my laptop in, open it when I want to take a note, and shut it again until the speaker says something of interest. I don't have to bother people around me by leaving the screen glowing the whole time, and at the last conference I was at I was able to easily get a whole days use on a single charge (15" Powerbook).

    From the specs, it sounds like your best fit really is a Powerbook. Don't let some of the oddities scare you away, then are negligible in the end compared to the build and feature quality you get with Apple laptops.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  197. Re:It has to be said.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah. grow up and just go buy a sun unix box. no, kidding, the parent is a stupid head and i'm telling.

  198. Mwave by valedaemon · · Score: 1

    Mwave has a nice range of notebooks and PCs available without the M$ tax. Their notebooks don't quite meet the lightweight spec you provided, but they are nice nonetheless.

  199. Re:Knoppix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think lnx-bbc must have moved their website because the link is dead:( Anyone know the new website or if there is a new site?

  200. Windoze-less Laptops by GroundBounce · · Score: 1

    The internet PC store Mwave has both Mwave and ECS brand notebook computers that are available without an OS. Prices aren't too bad either. The ECS models are a little unconventional, as they don't have internal batteries - they use only external batteries that must be purchased separately.

  201. How about BSD? by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If you want a nice BSD-ish UN*X box, look at the low-end PowerBook.

    1. Re:How about BSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this flamebait?

    2. Re:How about BSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's FLAMEBAIT if you're a little LINUX FAGGOT (with AIDS, but that goes without saying)

  202. Mitac by thecoolbean · · Score: 1

    I just purchased a laptop for my sister. It was a Mitac with a 1.7ghz celeron, 20gb hd, DVD-ROM (downgradable to CD) 4 USB ports, firewire, built in Ethernet, 56kmodem, and a whopping 15.1 viewable screen. It was a beauty to behold. Dealer cost on it was like 1170 without tax. That is obviously no OS. For grins I loaded Mandrake 9.0 on it (had to try). Detected everything without a hitch (except maybe the firewire. Nothing to test that with)

    Call mike at Gigabyte, Jax, Fl. (904) 739-6668. He'll sell them to anyone tho you got tax if no reseller ID.

  203. Angel Computers by jpt.d · · Score: 1

    eg: http://www.angelcomputer.com/cgi-bin/index.pl?page =detail&id=62&country=cdn&pp=22&type=b us No Operating System -85$ (cdn) They also have the same option (-85$) for choosing Linux.

    --
    What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
    1. Re:Angel Computers by juahonen · · Score: 1

      But they do not have an option to not buy MS Works...

  204. Batteries get old. by moroderzone · · Score: 1

    If your not playing games, buying it used is a great idea. Linux, if you set it up right, runs great on older computers. The only thing you will need is a new battery. Batteries get old.

  205. Jewel Notebooks by MBMarduk · · Score: 1

    Around the corner where I live there's a shop that sells these. NO WINDOWS as standard, like good Dutch custom the OS is an OPTION in the pricelists! IEEE1394, USB2, PCMCIA etc. It IS a Dutch company but I bet they'll deliver the goods to you anywhere with FedEx. Worth a try IMO.

    1. Re:Jewel Notebooks by MBMarduk · · Score: 1

      Grrrr. Sorry...I just woke up. Here's the link: http://www.jewelnotebooks.nl/

  206. Re:It has to be said.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is supposedly insightful?

    What do you suggest that the person asking the question, and others in a similar situation, should do?

    Buy a computer with Windows and just not use it?

    Switch to Windows?

    Get over what? That Microsoft has a monopoly? That Microsoft is making money off people who have no desire to use their products? Why should that be acceptable?

  207. Sharp C700 by Yomicron · · Score: 1

    Get a Sharp C700, its tiny, runs Linux, and at least looks like a laptop.

  208. I own one.... by cyberon22 · · Score: 1

    My Lifebook S 6110 runs Slackware 8.1 perfectly (woohoo!). I had to edit several files to get X-Windows and the sound card working and haven't tried configuring the built-in 802.11 card yet. I'd still recommend this machine to anyone looking for a portable laptop running Linux.

    The only thing that irritates me about Fujitsu though is that they don't even GIVE you the Windows install media when you BUY it - they stick a "rescue" partition on the hard drive that stops being recognized by their "disk rescue" software after you rewrite the partition table. I don't mind keeping a copy of Windows installed on a shrunken partition, but it really pisses me off to pay for something and then... not even get it.

  209. Hey how about this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A light, slender laptop that DOES run Windows!

    It's even better than one that DOESN'T.

  210. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by VValdo · · Score: 1

    What about the Apple tax that come with Apple hardware?

    It was said in another thread, but the difference is that you are buying a computer from a SOLE VENDER-- Apple. Apple is not forcing other companies to include Mac OS X when selling a non-Apple computer, unlike MIcrosoft.

    Put another way-- if you buy a Civic from Honda, there is no special added cost for the tires that come with it. Those tires are part of what make a Honda a Honda.

    BUT if Honda forced OTHER auto companies to make you pay for Honda tires on *all* THEIR cars (even if you wanted to put your own tires on it!), well, that would be unfair.

    W

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  211. That's my GUI... by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1, Informative
    The Apple comes with an actual GUI far superior to Microsoft Windows
    I realize this may be a little bit of a tangent but I for one am tired of people complaining about the Windows GUI. If you dislike the GUI of Windows XP then change it. Very few people know this but as easily as you can change from Bash to Korn in *nix you can swap the graphical shell in XP. A couple of the most popular ones are bb4win and Litestep.

    bb4win, which mimics the black box look and feel and is even compatible with the many existing black box styles.

    While LiteStep (one of the oldest windows shells) mimics the NeXT OS/Window Manager and has thousands of themes (and it's even GPL).

    If you use either of these or one of the many other shells (see Shell Extension City) along with WindowBlinds you won't even know you're using Windows (you can even make it look like KDE or OS X if you want).

    The point of all this is to say you're not stuck with the Windows interface, the start button, the task bar, the clock, or that annoying grouping feature of the programs menu. And I think MS has even embraced this some-what with an actual entry for "custom user interface" in gpedit.msc (Win2k and XP pro only). ... So stop complaining about the Windows interface.

    On the other hand if you were talking about the much complained about "fisher price" interface you can turn all that !@#$! off, albeit in no less then 4 different places (or crack open the regedit).

    ----------

    --
    "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
  212. Samsung Notebooks by eyeless · · Score: 1

    http://www.samsungelectronics.com/notebook/q10_ser ies/index.html

  213. Buy used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The m$ tax has already been paid...

  214. Re: I am Jack's MPW C compiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This reminds me of one of my favorite compiler error messages:

    • "Too many errors on one line (make fewer)"

    Some other good ones:

    • "You can't modify a constant, float upstream, win an argument with the IRS, or satisfy this compiler"
    • "This struct already has a perfectly good definition"
    • "This onion already has a perfectly good definition"
    • "...And the lord said, `lo, there shall only be case or default labels inside a switch statement'"
    • "a typedef name was a complete surprise to me at this point in your program"
    • "This array has no size, and that's bad"
    • "we already did this function"
    • "Call me paranoid but finding `/*' inside this comment makes me suspicious"
    • "Symbol table full - fatal heap error; please go buy a RAM upgrade from your local Apple dealer"

    Source: MacKido

  215. Sell windows to someone else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could still buy new and sell your OEM copy of windows. I don't know the legal status if it, but if you are not running it, and own a licence whay can you not sell it? I know that the newer win 2k/xp oem are stickers on the system.

  216. christmas break laptop by philipgar · · Score: 1

    I bought a new laptop recently over christmas break; and IBM thinkpad 600. It seems to run great; although I had to replace the battery in it initially (see prior slashdot issues on that). anyhow. The machine i have is a P2-300 MHZ machine. It can't even supply the dvd rom drive it has decently enoguh to decode them. However the machine does more then enough to run gnome2.2 on, and runs everything I need perfectly fine.br. Sure I won't have top of the line stuff. And i definately won't have IEEE 1394 support, but what linux box truely does? As for stuff like 802.11B. . buy a cheap card or ebay. works great. Philip

  217. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by BigDish · · Score: 1

    Perhaps that is worse. Not only does a company have a monopoly on software-they have it on hardware too. At least the PC is an open standard. Apple hardware is subject to Apple's whims. I'm not trying to put down Apple with this post-it's just that the person seems to want to avoid buying proipritary software, but has no problem buying propritary hardware, which I believe is even worse.

  218. http://www.tuxtops.com/ by theirpuppet · · Score: 1

    i worked for a company that bought a few from them. they were pretty happy. the price isn't that bad and customization is allowed. They build their own, so i don't think that you have to mickeysoft anything.

  219. The P2000 does come equipped with firewire. by fbw · · Score: 3, Informative
    The Fujitsu P2000 laptop does indeed come equipped with a firewire port, as well as USB2, as can be observed in the specifications page which is linked from the very url mentioned in the parent post.

    Here's a direct link.

    Also, here is a very good user discussion forum concerning the P2000 laptop, which actually has a seperate forum for the linux users, so you can check up on what you can expect:
    http://www.leog.net/fujp_forum/

    On a sidenote, I can say that Fijutsu will *not* ship any laptop without the windows license. In fact, when you send in the system for repair and they need to replace the hard drive (which contains the repair image), you have to pay for a new license.

    1. Re:The P2000 does come equipped with firewire. by jcknox · · Score: 1

      I have a Fujitsu P2110. It is fantastic! I bought a Targus case (designed for carrying Palms with a detachable keyboard) and it fits perfectly. I am a college professor, and use it almost everyday for class presentations, etc. I even showed part of the Making of LOTR DVD to my multimedia design class on it.

      If I were you, I'd find one of these used or suck it up and pay for the Windoze license, then nuke it.

      It has firewire, digital audio out, built in 802.11, DVD, CDRW combo drive, modem and LAN, a 1280 x 768 wide aspect screen, and great battery life. The only thing missing from this machine is IRDA and about 6 pounds of extra weight most other notebooks carry around.

  220. Why an notebook by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

    When you can have a little Sharp Zaurus C500 with Linux installed
    http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/sharp-c700 -review.htm l

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
  221. AL powerbook/Educational discount by allotrope · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i have had an ibook for about a year, and i'm a very satisified customer, my next upgrade will certainly be an 12" powerbook. (I use linux on a monster-desktop)

    what i haven't seen mentioned is that apple's education discounts are often pretty decent. my g.f. (who is a grad student) might "help" me get one, which where she is, is under $1700 with superdrive. when i spec out other portables with superdrive they usually seem to be currently ending up really close to that. plus i really like the hard metal case.....
    whenever i think of getting a portable for linux i'm always bummed about the wierd buttons and scrollwheels and stuff that i know i'll never quite get working under linux.
    heck, if i was going to get pc to run windows i'l still want one that was as simple, small, and cleanly designed as my ibook. the form-factor for me is something that i'm very comfortable with ergonomically.

  222. Don't know if anyone's said this... by PsychoFurryEwok · · Score: 1

    ...but for laptops without an OS try www.sager.com Sager laptops are top notch, cheap price, support linux (mostly) and can be bought without an OS (do the customize machine thing and you can choose it all.) Also, www.pctorque.com who is a sager supplier offers some torque's to Sager's for just as cheap in case Sager doesn't have directly what you're looking for.

  223. What about the Sharp SL C700 ? by Uzull · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Preinstalled with linux, subnotebook format...
    It's just an idea...

  224. Girls by edmo · · Score: 1

    While your analisys is verey thuro you forgot to mention 1 of the arguably most important fetures of apples. Style. You cary a wintell laptop you look like a geek, you cary a mac, well lets just say it can work somthing like a cute puppy. For some reson females like cute and macs are just about the only computers that qualify...

    --
    Don't save your orgasms for Heaven; Heaven knows we need them here.
    1. Re:Girls by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
      Ask me how far up the list baiting girls with my Linux laptop falls on the list of feature considerations. I'll give up that feature not to have to sacrifice a dedicated meta key if I want to paste with gpm.

      When they stick enough mouse buttons on the thing, then I'll care if it's shiny.

      Why the hell can't apple make a three button laptop? Make it a $20 option, or stick a single cover over the three buttons and let folks pry it off if they want three buttons. Even when using OS X, one button is obnoxious.

      And yes, I know I can plug an external mouse in. No, I'm not willing to do that on a plane, at the bus stop, or on a presentation podium, and I promise you that extra peripherals hanging off detract from Edmo's believed girl magnet factor.

  225. What's weird is.. by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    The places that will sell you a computer without Windows charge the same or more. Might as well get the box with Windows and format the drive.

  226. Re:Knoppix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, then again I hate linux. One of my choices os is freebsd.org

  227. 12" G4 by TangoCharlie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like you want on ene of the new 12" G4 laptops. Comes with *nix as standard. OK,
    it _is_ expensive, but if it's want you really want then it's worth it. Also, don't forget that the
    GHz rating for P4-M laptops is a load of crock. My
    Compaq EVI N800v (1.7GHz P4-M) spends most of its time running at 1.1 GHz because it's running on batteries. Also, if battery life is really important, then you you'll find the Macs hard to beat.

    --
    return 0; }
  228. Re:Knoppix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now this Knoppix Boot CD tells you where you can buy the computer you tested to see if the laptop is "linux certified"? I am sorry but this is just an add. After all its not that hard to find out if a computer is suppoted by a given OS. Not to mention the main problem the poster brought up was finding a laptop with out windows. Am I to assume then that some store will let you stick a cd into any laptop that has no OS to see if your OS of choice will work? I think not.

    Why to I keep saying OS of choice? Simple this topic also applies to people who wish to run *BSD's too. Linux isn't the only game in town, nor is it the best team in town (in my eyes that is).

  229. Re:It has to be said.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insightful!? Bwaaaaahaaaahahahahaha sniff..sniff. :)

  230. Why no worries about the AppleOS tax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think their software team works for free? Or are you just one of those "I just hate MS, just because, well, they're evil" types?

    1. Re:Why no worries about the AppleOS tax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which company has been found to have a monopoly?

      Even ignoring that, I think that a company that produces both the hardware and software has more of an ethical right to bundle them together inseparably.

    2. Re:Why no worries about the AppleOS tax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah....

      Then pony up the AnonymOS(c)(TM) tax since I don't have a monopoly, and that makes it all OK. $100 please.

      Way to completely miss the point, sporto.

  231. IBM or Dell. Call for no OS by jasonla · · Score: 5, Informative

    When you buy online, most companies such as Dell, IBM, Compaq, etc. will force you to buy some software package.

    If you, however, call them on the phone and talk to one of their sales reps, you can have the bundled software removed (including the OS).

    I would recommend a Dell, or if you have the money for it, an IBM Thinkpad. I love my ThinkPad.

    You just have to talk to a real person, which I understand is sometimes difficult for some computer literate people, but you have to work to get what you want in life. :)

    1. Re:IBM or Dell. Call for no OS by JoeSmack · · Score: 1

      I am a proud owner of a thinkpad. I love it. Though powerbooks are a bit of a temptation.

    2. Re:IBM or Dell. Call for no OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And will Dell, IBM, Compaq etc. give you a rebate for the software that they are no longer including? I think THAT is the point of the so-called "Microsoft Tax" that people are bitching about here.

  232. Re:Knoppix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont ask. Just do it. Thats what I do. And I leave it there.I am willing to bet more then salesguy will actually check it out once he realized there is no harm done. It is an interesting distro to play with.

  233. Re:the not so dumb answer... by Sad+Loser · · Score: 3, Informative
    A couple of points
    • A non-apple notebook depreciates 1/(2^n) where n is the time in years you bought it.
    • It is better to buy a really good quality one, as they are much better put together.
    I develop on linux, but can't wean myself off editplus (although I like kate a lot). I have just bought a couple of toshiba 7200s for about $600. With the money I have saved, they now have 802.11,10/100, and 320MB, 40GB. Ultralight magnesium frame, made in japan quality, and still the biggest screen on an ultralight (13.3 XGA). Both dualboot 2000/7.3. One mainly 2000, one mainly 7.3, but redundancy is useful. And buying second hand means you are not paying anything to the he-who-cannot-be-named.
    --
    Humorous signatures are over-rated.
  234. Re:800 x 600? Nooooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never run a display at more than 1024x768. ... I get sort of lost and confused at anything higher than that.

    Then you're a bit of a simpleton, aren't you? Resolution doesn't have to affect the size of icons or text. As you increase your resolution, set your icon and font scale to be larger. This is an OS/window manager setting, so it applies to all apps immediately. At the very least your eyes or aesthetic sense will thank you for smoother text, especially on the notebook LCD display (with precise dot pitch, unlike a CRT).

  235. Stay away from the R505 by stecker · · Score: 5, Informative
    You mentioned that you were looking at a VAIO R505. Stop. Stay away. Go no further.

    I just replaced a R505 with a 12" PowerBook. In every respect, the Apple is the superior machine:

    • The R505 series of Vaio feel very very cheap. The nice metal cover that had been on the older series Vaios has been replaced by a run-of-the-mill piece of plastic. After a year, the screen hinge barely works, and the power adapter socket will only make an adequate connection when I hold it just right.

    • On paper, the R505 is smaller, but it doesn't feel any smaller. The way the 12"PB is hinged makes it open in a very compact way - unlike the R505 which seems to need a great deal more room to fully open. On a train or plane, the 12" PB can be held on the tray table with the screen at a reasonable angle even with the seat reclined in front of you. No chance of doing this with the Vaio.

    • Finally, the PB12" is much much smaller when you consider its relative size with the DVD drive installed. On the Vaio, you need to plug the unit into its base to get the DVD drive - doubling the size and weight of the thing. With the Apple, it's just there, and just works.

    • You say you're fine with a PCMCIA 802.11 solution, but have you really used one of these for any length of time? The antenna portion of the card makes for an awkward fit - especially compared with the elegance of the Mac's built-in airport.


    Don't get me started on OSX. You want to run Linux why? Honestly, with X11 installed within OSX, I'm finding it hard to find reasons to run Linux.
    1. Re:Stay away from the R505 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: "the power adapter socket will only make an adequate connection when I hold it just right"

      I had the same problem with my Z505. I ordered a new power connector through Sony Parts for $25 and replaced it myself. Granted, $25's a lot for a small bit of plastic and wire, but it's better than constantly holding the AC adapter in place.

    2. Re:Stay away from the R505 by call+-151 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Another important consideration is the warranty service. Sony's service model is awful- they do not distribute parts (even the screws on the bottom that continuously fall out) to dealers, so even the most minor repair means a hassle. Specifically, it means waiting on the phone with bozos in Florida, sending it back to Sony in California, calling Texas a few dozen times to check on the status of your repair, and the end result is that you are laptop-less for weeks. It says a great deal about Sony's attitude if they think it is reasonable for someone to be without their computer for six weeks. This wouldn't be such a big deal if the tiny Vaios that are so attractive weren't so flimsy that stuff is breaking on them all the time.

      Contrast that with Apple- they have lots of capable places where people can fix your machine while you wait (don't get me started about how amazing the Powerbook triage unit at Tekserve in Manhattan is...) and if you have to send it back, they do a great job turning things around pronto. They know that not having your computer is a big deal and do a lot to minimize the time you are without it.

      --
      It's psychosomatic. You need a lobotomy. I'll get a saw.
    3. Re:Stay away from the R505 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh.. You make me think I should just get rid of my R505.. Except that it has been PERFECT.

      I bought it in July.. It is a 1.13/PIII/30 GB/256MB. I am running 2.4.19 on RedHat.

      The ibook may be sweet, but Linux is a requirement for me.

      Apple wouldn't be shipping a UNIX-derived OS if not for Linux.

    4. Re:Stay away from the R505 by XtAt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've had mine for a year and have had none of these problems! I use Orinoco wireless every day.

      See my howto: http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/t/j/tjt148/vaio

      --
      - about me
  236. Sony VAIO U1 or U3 by Technomancer · · Score: 1

    Is the only thing worth buying.
    And till I have money for VAIO I picked up used Toshiba Portege 3480CT on ebay. It is a good piece of hardware with good linux support - currently running Gentoo.

  237. ECS also makes real notebooks by FRiC · · Score: 1

    ECS has recently started selling true notebooks (i.e. based around low powered CPU's and with an internal battery) outside of Taiwan. They have one model that look exactly like the Desknote models, but have an internal battery, PC Card slot, and higher resolution LCD displays. Other models are comparable featurewise to what other manufacturers offer, but come at a lower cost, and without Windows bundled.

  238. Are you sure? by edxwelch · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to Gateway's testomany in the MS court case : "Gateway also faulted another provision of the new licensing agreement, which requires PC makers to pay a Windows royalty on every PC shipped, even if it didn't include Windows. To top it off, to qualify for market development funds, PC makers have to put a Microsoft OS on every PC. As a result, trying to sell non-Windows PCs, or even PCs without software, is a financial loser for computer makers." http://news.com.com/2100-1001-868413.html

    1. Re:Are you sure? by Steve+Hamlin · · Score: 1

      I would be very surprised if the author of that article shouldn't have written: "Gateway had to put a MS OS on every PC to qualify for the market development fund licensing agreement, which requires PC makers to pay a Windows royalty on every PC shipped, even if it didn't include Windows."

      i.e. the *market development funds agreement* mandated the royalty for every PC, but NOT the overall Windows licensing agreement.

      Very slight difference to be sure, but the 1994 consent decree (evilpenguin's post about MS-DOS is probably correct given the 1994 date) prevented MS from demanding a royalty for every PC sold in exchange for the ability to sell MS licenses AT ALL.

      I wouldn't think MS would/could go back to this sort of behavior.

      Of course, in reality, *the effect is virtually the same.* With a price to small and/or disloyal OEMs of, $60/seat (guess) for consumer OSes, and the "market development funds" of $10 per seat, plus other assorted allowances for produyct loyalty, it might not be economically feasible for a large company like Gateway to NOT agree to those trems, especially if Dell and its other main competitors do get the discounts.

      However, I would think that a small OEM that wants to sell some MS OSes along with other OSes *CAN* get a MS license, as opposed to MS being able to say "go screw". Albeit without the discounts, etc.

      If MS says "no licenses AT ALL if you dare sell other OSes", then I think that MS would quickly wind up back in court.

    2. Re:Are you sure? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      You're probably right. This explains why we see no Windows free PCs from the big OEMs. Dispite the fact that the agreement was ment to make the playing field even, MS have found huge loopholes which make it fairly worthless. Business back to usual.

  239. IBM? by midgley · · Score: 1

    Do they not (still) sell a ThinkPad with Linux pre-installed? I think it has only been a small proportion of the range, but ask.

    I like ThinkPads, I havn't seen another portable that closes itself into a box, my Dell and Acer before it both have screens that hover over the keys when closed, and netiehr keep out fluff nor seem rigidly supported.

    1. Re:IBM? by JoeSmack · · Score: 1

      No, they do not. Not because they don't want to but because they can't afford it anymore, lack of demand, yada, yada.

  240. Simple solution by TheMidget · · Score: 1
    Buy any laptop you want. But buy it on credit. "Forget" to pay the last installment, which just "happens" to be the price of the windows licence, and instead just mail your licence certificate via certified mail...

    If they rat you out to credit reporting agencies, contest.

    Remember: possession is half of the law!

  241. Get a PowerBook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a PowerBook, you won't even need to install Linux of it once you try out Mac OS X!

  242. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by Apotsy · · Score: 1

    Actually, he never says he wouldn't use Mac OS X.

  243. linux over ibook by maiomaster · · Score: 1

    Unlike some months ago, linux now runs pretty well on those hw. there are a number of distros which ships their own ppc-based releases, most notably mandrake, suse, debian, gentoo. notwithstanding just a few months ago it would be very difficult to build a good and complete ppc-linux box yourself, there are now many good guides, most of which very easy step-by-step guides, which will let you get quickly and easily a well-working OS. Probably for it's vivacity and support debian's still the most fair choiche right now, but i'm curious to see what will mandrake do with its 9.1-ppc. For the moment, those are some really nice guides: http://mij.oltrelinux.com/ibook/ppc_linux.html http://people.debian.org/~branden/ibook.html http://www.cattlegrid.net/~christophe/titanium/ http://www.hispalinux.es/~data/ibook/

  244. Asus S1 by tempmpi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Asus S1 Series
    Got everything you wanted, is thin & light and still got a 13,3" screen and you can purchase it without a OS. A internal WLAN nic is available,too.
    Linux seems to work without (big) problems: Howto from Linux-on-laptops

    --
    Jan
    1. Re:Asus S1 by BenjyD · · Score: 1
      From the Asus S1 page linked above:

      Its sexy silver magnesium-alloy casing harnesses the power of the advanced Intel Pentium III-M mobile processor,...

      Huh? I had to read that several times before I realised, no, it doesn't make any sense.
    2. Re:Asus S1 by molli123 · · Score: 0

      I am using a S1300A from Asus and it is great. Thin and light, I don't need to carry my optical drive with me all the time and sold without Windows. The only negative point is that the ones sold in europe are only avaiable with pcmcia-wlan (no mini-pci modules avaiable, no internal antennas) I like mine, Micha !

  245. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

    You throw the monopoly moniker around far too freely like many of the slashdot ilk. A vertical monopoly where a product goes from conception to fruition under the aegis of a single company is entirely different from a horizontal monpoly where a single company owns all means for an industry to do business. Anyone ever saying a vertical monpoly is bad is being ridiculous and dense. Vertical monopolies can be avoided, if you don't buy from Apple you don't support their monopoly. If you don't buy from Sun you don't support their monopoly. However if you buy from HP you can't switch to Dell or Gateway to avoid Microsoft's monopoly. Microsoft's monopoly stangles the industry, Apple's only strangles their small fraction of the market.

    Then you go and bring up proprietary hardware, I'd really like to know what the hell in a Mac you think is so proprietary. Every Mac since the iMac has had OpenFirmware which lets you boot any OS you want to on a Mac. Older Macs had a MacROM but those have been dropped since the iMac. What is left that is proprietary? Hmmm, Bluetooth? No. Firewire? Nope. USB? Hmm not quite. AGP? Again no. PCI? Sorry. SDRAM? Try again.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  246. Give It Up by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Give it up. Seriously. It's easy enough to build your own PC without paying MS tax, but it's harder to find prebuilt PCs without Windows preloaded, simply because there isn't much demand for them. For portables it becomes even harder because there is less demand for them to begin with. I am surprised you were even able to find any, so if you also start to be picky about the specs (lightweight, and especially long battery life), I think you are just making it into a mission impossible. At least it would be more of a hassle than getting a Windows refund, which has the additional benefit that it sends a signal to the people involved that people really _do_ want portables without Windows and _do_ think it's bad if they have to pay the MicroSoft tax anyway. So, my suggestion is just to buy the hardware that suits you best, and make as much fuss as is necessary to get your Windows refund.

    I am not opposed to bundling (neither hardware with software, nor apps with OSen), but it should always be an option, like, it should be clearly indicated that the system with OS X (where X means any) costs Y extra compared to a clean system. Since reality is not like that, I think we should voice out to change it. It's not anly about the knowledgable (spalling?) having to pay for something they don't want, it also about educating the laymen, making them realize that MS software is just another option, and not the only choice they have.

    ---
    "I think that the anti-Microsoft sentiment is simply due to their having been
    so successful selling a lot of crap." -Woz

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  247. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he's right on and the drivel that is the grand parent is just wrong.

  248. try fujitsu seimens! by verayh · · Score: 1

    Our department is happily buying Fujitsu Siemens laptops WITHOUT any OS! They also ship a Suse demo disk! There's a range to choose from, though you might find that for gaming, you'll pay too much. Good luck!

  249. Re:Knoppix. by haggar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Er... am I missing something here, or is this post completely off-topic? I thought the main point was about NOT paying for Windows.

    --
    Sigged!
  250. Just buy the iBook by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple software tax notwithstanding, if/when you come to resell, the iBook will have retained FAR more of it's original selling price than virtually ANY x86 notebook.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
    1. Re:Just buy the iBook by kyrre · · Score: 1

      This of course is not correct anymore. Apple has been slashing prices every 6 months lately. This destroy the resale value of used Macs. I bought an iBook last march for about $2000. Today I would be lucky if I could sell it for $800.

    2. Re:Just buy the iBook by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      and just how much would a winders machine be worth?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Just buy the iBook by Webb21 · · Score: 0
      Of course, computers aren't exactly a financial investment. You buy them for their use, not in the hopes that you will gain a monetary return. Of course, if you upgrade a lot (as in buy a new system), a low resale value can be a pain. Same as with cars. "My trade in value is what?!"

      --
      "A good compromise leaves everyone mad." -Calvin
  251. Re: Consumer statements by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

    This is one thing that really stands out. I buy a lot of hybrid CD's, mostly learning games for my daughter's Mac. Unfortunately, since the stores don't have MacOS-only software, it doesn't get conted as a sale for MacOS systems. They see no reason to accomodate Apple owners.

    If the consumer wants Linux, there's no reason why Microsoft (or the hardware manufactures) should register this as a Windows sale. Doing so will only aggravate the situation in the long term, as it skews perceptions.

  252. Re:Knoppix. by haggar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, really strange they wouldn't allow me to boot all the PCs in the store from that ripper-infected floppy.

    --
    Sigged!
  253. Talk about not even trying..... by imroy · · Score: 1
    Red Hat had no idea what was going on, it couldn't find a sound card, anything to use the extra buttons, jog dials etc...

    Ok, so the Red Hat installer couldn't find those things but what about you? Did you try anything like loading drivers manually? looking at the output of lspci? googling for answers? Hell, did you even try other distros? I've heard that Knoppix has very good hardware detection, although maybe even the U3 is too weird/new. The distro's installation procedure is not the end of setting up a Linux machine, it's just the start!

    1. Re:Talk about not even trying..... by gh · · Score: 1

      The guy should've googled for it. There's a few sites covering how to get installed on U1/U3 laptops. The biggest problem is caused by chipset detection routines in default 2.4 kernels. If you either rebuild 2.4 or use an older/newer kernel the install goes much smoother.

      Heck, a site that sells Japanese marketed products (http://www.conics.net) even has a link to one of those sites for getting Linux on the U1.

  254. Sony Vaio PCG-R600HMKD by maharg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Got one of these last week through work - my first impression was OMG!! but it's now running good - 1024x768@24bit - with full access to everything on the docking station, including the firewire/scsi/ide/wtf?? CD-R/DVD drive.

    It's light (without the docking station :o)), and has everything you want. I read somethere that it is the european version of the R505 ?

    I (eventually) settled on redhat 8.0. You have to boot off the first CD, then do a network (http/ftp/nfs) install due to the firewire CD drive..

    You'll then want to get the 2.4.20 kernel, and apply the ACPI patch from http://acpi.sourceforge.net/

    You'll also need the updated i830 driver from intel at http://support.intel.com/support/graphics/linux/gr aphics.htm

    A pretty good wireless howto can be found at http://www.cowplop.com/writing/pcg-srx77/.

    Anyhow, a week on, it's really shaping up. I'm refining a HOWTO which I'll post and get linked from http://www.linux-on-laptops.com/sony.html real soon. If anyone's wanting to get one of these up and running ASAP, contact me via my website (link above) and I'll email you the howto as it stands.

    --

    $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
    @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    1. Re:Sony Vaio PCG-R600HMKD by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Is this post intended as an Apple ad? Seriously, 'I bought a new laptop, and after a loat of hastle it was kind of working in an OS which just about does fint anti-aliasing, but doesn't really have a consitent look and feel (actually it has several, which is the problem. Alternatively, I could have bought a Powerbook, but then I wouldn't have had the fun of installing custom drivers for everything, and hacking my kernel for the first week, so it wouldn't have been worth it.' Seriously, multiply your hourly rate by the time spent trying to make this machine run Linux. Is it really worth that much? Sure, open source is a nice idea, but personally I value my time.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Sony Vaio PCG-R600HMKD by maharg · · Score: 1

      No, my comment was not intended as an apple ad.
      It was intended as a response to the question posed in the post.
      Your mileage may vary, of course.
      By the by, I am being paid my hourly rate to get the vaio fully functional, as my boss and 3 coworkers got the same laptop last week, and they ALL want to run linux on them. Smokin' :o))

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
  255. do it - buy the powerbook by Kaneda · · Score: 1

    I've had my 12" PB since friday, and I'm so glad I did it. It's my first mac. I like solaris and linux, but don't feel comfortable running linux as my primary workstation. The mac gives me as much unix as I want, and I can still run mainstream apps. But the real clincher is the attention to detail that apple pays - it's hard to quantify, but there is a polish and finesse to the mac and to macos x that is quite unlike anything I've found in the PC world.

  256. Re:It has to be said.. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    Seeing as you can't spell, why should we believe that you can reason?

    Eh?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  257. Buy cheap one with windows, donate savings to EFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have another suggestion:

    Get very cheap one like $700 HP ZE4209 from Staples or Dell. Delete Windows XP.
    Donate $150 to EFF. Use tax exempt.
    This is much more than HP paid to Microsoft!

    And you get a cheap brand name notebook too!

    Kubus

  258. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by La+Temperanza · · Score: 1

    Apple tried to make their hardware an open standard back in '97, remember? It nearly put them out of business.

    --

    --
    est modus in rebus
  259. Contradiction by zerosignal · · Score: 1

    "I'm looking for PC notebook computers that outperform the iBook" ...
    "Performance isn't a major concern"

    Make your mind up!

    1. Re:Contradiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey.

      Add up the numbers. Outperforming the iBook clearly is a trivial matter, hardly worth concerning oneself with.

      But thanks for pointing out his non-contradiction.

  260. Windows Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The windows tax you talked about. well, as the tax is not only on the os but also on application front such as office(more so). microsoft maintains mainly its monoply through windows(i doubt if windows earns much using home editions of os, but mainly from enterpize eds) but uses its application programs to make more money (both though licences and upgrades). so by just buying a laptop with windows, i don't think you are paying much to the vole. just make sure that you are not paying for other ms software such as office/works etc and then throw away the os and install whatever you want. do check with vendor that all the h/w is linux compatible. good luck

  261. refurb by spoonyfork · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd suggest a refurbished Dell from Dell Financial Services. These are machines that were used by businesses as part of a lease program and were returned. Most still have warranties. More importantly, no OS and no OS tax. Check it out.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  262. Re: Apple *did* have the first touchpad by iJed · · Score: 1

    I did not realise that Apple brought this terrible thing to the world! :-) I used to use a good old PowerBook 140 and it had a track ball which was far easier to use than any stupid track pad. Currently I have an iBook 500 and I cannot understand why laptop makers continue to use these silly pads or, even worse, these point things in the middle of the keyboard.

  263. Don't buy Sharp by randy_ch · · Score: 1

    Or at least this one: Mebius PC-SX1-H1.

    When I considered purchase of a laptop, this offering from Sharp caught my eye immediately. It's light (3.2lbs), long battery life(5 hr), powered by a Transmeta Crusoe processor, with an excellent screen, and the specification looks perfect for Linux installation. I live in Taiwan and all the laptops I could find didn't seem Liunx-friendly except possibly this one. However, the agency didn't approve of my request to avoid the Microsoft tax, and I couldn't do anything with it because no one sold a laptop without Windows preloaded here.

    I thought I made a good deal until finding that my rtl8139 network card didn't work under Linux. It is because Sharp uses ACPI to configure peripheral devices, and no matter how I tried, I could not get it work. The purchase turns out to be a BIG disppointment for me.

    So did any one have experience in dealing with ACPI-based laptops, or should we who wants to run Linux exclusively stay away from them?

    (PS: I have also tried FreeBSD and knoppix, but both failed, too)

  264. Re: Apple *did* have the first touchpad by Draoi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I cannot understand why laptop makers continue to use these silly pads

    'coz;

    • They're cheap
    • They're easy to manufacture and test
    • They're far more reliable
    • Maintenance-free. No more mouse 'cheese' ...
    • As they're sealed, the usual crap can't get into them
    • They can also operate as a mouse button. Tap. Tap and drag, etc. Another Apple first
    • For many, they're more intuitive than a mouse or trackball (yeah, really!)
    • Pro users can operate them faster than meeses ...
    --
    Alison

    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

  265. TransMeta by archiDORK · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like a Transmeta device would be right on target. You can then avoid both windows and intel.

    http://www.antelopetech.com

    http://www.transmeta.com

    1. Re:TransMeta by mcgroarty · · Score: 1

      I can't find any indication that you can actually buy the AntelopeTech device.

  266. Uniwill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uniwill (www.uniwill.com) is now making barebones "whitebox" laptops for resellers. I think these will be great for the industry, and for Linux users in particular.

    Ask your local dealer if any of their distributors offer them.

    If not, send me an e-mail at:

    laptop@newmillenniumcomputing.com

    http://www.newmillenniumcomputing.com

    I just got the notice from my distributor, so haven't put any together, yet. No info on durability or performance, either.

  267. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by NNKK · · Score: 1

    Their hardware is an open standard *NOW*. You can buy off-the-shelf parts from multiple vendors and assemble a system capable of running MacOS unmodified. The only catch is that the MacOS license explicitly forbids running of MacOS on non-Apple-supplied hardware. That's not a closed standard, it's saying "If you want this OS, you have to buy our hardware". As Apple is not a monopoly, I really couldn't care less. If Apple were to do something I *really* didn't like, I'd have somewhere else to go with a minimum of hassle.

    Furthermore (IANAL), that license claus isn't really enforcable on an individual, provided you weren't using the same license on multiple systems. Basically the only thing it does is prevent manufacturers from selling hardware with MacOS installed; an individual could move an existing license off their iMac and on to some high-end PowerPC system.

  268. Re:Toshiba by natmakarvitch · · Score: 1

    Toshiba SETUP ('BIOS' configuration) software tools. dunno if they take care of all the parms of the very last models. since 1999 I had 2 Toshiba Portégé laptops (the last one is a 3480CT). theyre are robust but I'm not very happy, esp. with the last one: * an asterisk for each touch punched when you type your BIOS password (not very secure, one can read on the number of asterisk to know the number of characters, you cannot fake the earer counting the punches by typing on dead keys) * the screen doesn't open up completely (it can be useful) * crappy 'micro joystick' mouse (imprecise, erratic moves), w only 2 buttons * crappy screwing (most screws fall appart), probably due to the assembling made in Europe * the integrated sound port is near the USB port, it is unusable when this last one is used (electronic noise) * the Ethernet port is not integrated (you have to carry the big thingie containing the extensions ports) and the Linux driver cannot warm reset it (note: there is an internal port for an external screen! and no place for Eth :-( ) * bad PCMCIA placement (your hang weights on the netcard connector) and so on... moreover they are overpriced, and the parts are pricey example: the power supply cable to the laptop is proprietary (specific connector on the PC side) was cut by simple an normal usage (I fold it in order to put the laptop in a case) and the catalog price is 120 euros (1 euro is approx 1 US buck) here (France)!

  269. Libretto 50CT by odyrithm · · Score: 1

    about the size of a video cassete, color 640x480 screen, 3hour batt that can be upgraded to about 6 with a heavy duty batt.. P75 chip that can be clocked to 166 with some wire and a bit of soldering ;) (Ive only plucked up the balls to goto 100(toasty))... erm 800meg hd, 16meg as standard mem.. will run most distros fine.. and it will more than likely fit in one of your coat pockets..

    ebay for em.. theres also the 110CT which is a 266mmx I think, with a bigger lcd.. but its bigger than the 50CT.

    --
    moo
  270. Re: Apple *did* have the first touchpad by rknop · · Score: 2, Informative

    They can also operate as a mouse button. Tap. Tap and drag, etc. Another Apple first

    This, to my mind, is the absolute worst feature about them. I hate this. Reason: I'm typing away, and want to move the mouse. So I go and move my thumbs to the pad to move the pointer. Result: I've just clicked somewhere I don't want to click. If I'm lucky, I can back out of what I just unintentionally clicked on and didn't close something.

    Any input device where you have to be very, very careful to touch it gingerly so as not to accidentally give input you didn't mean to give is a poorly designed input device, in my opinion.

    -Rob

  271. Expensive veganism? by Sunnan · · Score: 1

    If you want to live on the cheap, you'd be better of as a vegan or a lactovegetarian, especially if you go the DIY-route with soy beans and chick peas. "Fake" dairy products are expensive as hell but if you're eating that, what are you doing with veganism? It's still less expensive than meat, at least where I live.

    My mom occasionally gets that stuff so she can cook traditional food so I've tried it, but I often don't buy it for myself since it's so expensive.

  272. Novatech by TinheadNed · · Score: 1

    Their website is here. Only catch is I don't think their laptops do firewire.

  273. iBook by BigLonely · · Score: 1

    I run Debian on an iBook.... I did the "takeover" installation, that is, Debian is all I have in the iBook. Linux runs very fast on an iBook.... and, the internal USB connected modem has a driver which may be had from Conexant or from the Apple Darwin site under "third party drivers".... which has drivers for all the possible modem types. Really, the iBook is the best machine I have ever owned..... very tough. I recently requested that IBM sell me a Think Pad without Windows.... They refused, the hypocrites who spout their "linux friendly" crap out of the side of their corporate piggy snouts.. It seems that Micro$nout has them by their porcine balls via "unwritten threats"......

  274. Re: Apple *did* have the first touchpad by Draoi · · Score: 1
    System Preferences->Mouse->Trackpad

    Uncheck the 'clicking' checkbox and/or the 'dragging' one.

    Job done! That was easy, eh?

    --
    Alison

    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

  275. Re:Knoppix. by rknop · · Score: 1

    Kind of ironic that you're not permitted to 'test' the machine you're about to fork out several thousand dollars for.

    When I was last searching for a laptop I encountered this brick-wall mentality, consequently I ended up telling them "Oh, in that case, no sale, goodbye" ( Commissions obviously doesn't exist in sales any more ).

    I failed to do that once, and regretted it. It was 1993 or some such, and I was trying to get a monitor for my Amiga 1200. Being a cheapsakte and wanting to save money, I figurd I'd get a standard massmarket SVGA monitor instead of paying more for a Commodore monitor, since I thought that ought to work. I go to CompUSA to ask what they have there. I ask the guy if I could bring my computer in and try it out. Ha. No go. He had a nice, friendly excuse about how he'd love to help me out, but it was Sunday morning and it was going to get real busy in there before long.... (Meanwhile, it's real quiet in there and several sales people are just standing around.)

    Sucker, stupid-ass me goes and buys a monitor anyway from a place that has just demonstrated as clearly as can be deomnstrated that they are customer-hostile.. And, no, it doesn't work. I did return it, and got a check for the refund a month later. (That also irritated me; I was a grad student, and a couple hundred dollars of cash flow was significant at the time.) (I don't remember if there was a "restocking" fee.) I kicked myself from buying from such a customer-hostile place, and eschewed all CompUSA's for some 7 or 8 years thereafter. (Nowadays, I do go into them, but don't buy anything there I wouldn't also just buy mail order from another mass-market place. I've moved a few times, it's no longer the same store, and the small places I trusted (including that Amiga shop) have all gone out of business.)

    For the Amiga, I ended up buying a more expensive commodore monitor from the same shop where I bought the computer in the first place-- you know, a small friendly shop where I knew the people. I should have just done that in the first place, but the siren song of lower prices for bulk hardware is hard to ignore.

    -Rob

  276. Small Light Computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    angelcomputers.com offers several offerings of small computers under 2 kg with no os, or redhat

  277. Tiny Laptop for Linux by marco(o)bigslash.org · · Score: 3, Informative

    Fujitsu P-2110 - 860 Mhz Crusoe Processor - 256 Megs ram - 20 Gig disk - 8 meg Rage Mobility Chip - 2 USB - 1 Firewire - 1 PCMCIA Type 2/3 port - Removable DVD/CD-RW drive - built in 802.11b I've succesfully installed and used for months and months Slackware 7.1 and 80. I have read the forums and found that several people there use Debian and Gentoo. This laptop is about 11 inches wide and 7 inches deep and about one inch high. It's about 2-3 lbs without the burner in it. Wicked laptop!

  278. Resell the OEM for a profit? by jdieterman · · Score: 1

    Why don't you but the PC you want and take out (1) screw (pun intended) and sell the OEM license with that screw for the approximate cost of the license. You (technically) haven't given any money to MS then (the person you sell the license too will have). Just a thought. I haven't read the EULA lately for OEM but you used to be able to do this?

  279. ASUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm looking for something myself as well.

    ASUS sells laptops with a discount if you do not want M$ installed.

    But I do feel attracted to those nice powerbooks.....

    And whatever everybody says:
    _yes_ it is worth to install linux on a powerbook. Because I develop linux, _not_ OS-X.
    No matter how nice it is, I do not use a PC to get things done, I make it able to get things done.

  280. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

    Honda doesn't put Honda-brand tires on their Civic line of vehicles.

    You might want to check for yourself.

  281. Try ASL http://www.aslab.com/ by gatzke · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.aslab.com/

    ASL Linux is great. I have a Monarch laptop. It is a ~3.5 lbs with a nice XGA 13 inch screen. Detachable base for CD/battery/floppy adds another 3 lbs. Mine is pretty old, but I asume the new ones are pretty nice. Good service, only install Windows if you pay extra. They set up partitions however you want, even networking. My laptop has 1 pc card slot, I use it for wireless at home.

    I have bought a few other orders from these guyst (desktop systems). They will gladly dual boot your system and configure to your needs. They have been around for a while as well. I think I bought my first desktop from them four years back.

    Ed

  282. UK buyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.novatech.co.uk do laptops, with windows as an optional extra

    1. Re:UK buyers by DancingSword · · Score: 1

      Or, try DeskNote a929, which you can price at PriceWatch ( though I don't see any of the 1400x1050 versions there ), or on froogle.google.com, whough they don't sort-by .. anything .. apparently...

      --
      Messages to/for me ( in me journal )
  283. Microsoft must be doing something right by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Yeah, like illegaly leveraging its monopoly and some how miraculeosly getting just and slap in the wrist.

    Those MS lawyers are brilliant.

    Add to that consumer apathy (brilliantly displayed in this thread) and you have sure recipe for success.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  284. They're called Desknotes... by wetson · · Score: 1

    ...made by ECS in Taiwan. The concept is that they put half desktop components (CPU, RAM), half notebook components (HD, Optical drive) in a portable form factor. It's basically a portable desktop, not a use-on-the-road laptop. The battery does come extra...the price is a bit high on that link though. I'm pretty sure you can find it cheaper in other sites...try newegg

  285. You want: Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook P by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    The Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook P is your ticket to ride. Small, laden with extra hardware (wlan f. example) and linux runs smooth. A friend of mine has debian woody up and running and even watches movies with it (cinema display too!!!)
    It has a transmeta and runs 16 hrs. (!!) in real life with the powerakku stuck in (which is better for typing too).
    You'll have to swallow your pride and purchase an oem winxp license with it's hdd though.
    But you can join the refund community and kick some ass too. :-)
    There's a solid Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook P fan community on the net and a subtacial amount of linux users among them. Have them tell you the best config and the newest model.
    And prepare to shed somehting like 2 grand for the extras (akkucells) and the best darn notebook on the planet.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  286. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it is because Apple actually does innovate, and doesn't put other companies out of business in the process of doing so.

    There are many reasons for not wanting to pay the M$ tax. Mine is that I do not want to do business with a convicted monopolilst who still appears to believe that bankrupting their business partners is an ethical way to do business.

    Since I believe that M$ is ethically and morally bankrupt, I choose to not support them in any way. It has nothing to do with whether a commercial operating system is pre-installed on a laptop or not.

    I hope this clarifies the issue for you.

  287. Tux! by Ancker.net · · Score: 1

    www.penguincomputing.com

    Need I say more?

    1. Re:Tux! by Monofilament · · Score: 1

      That would rock if they sold Laptops... unfortunately.. i looked around on the site.. and well either the laptop section is really hard to find or it doesn't exist..

      --


      Who makes you Sig?
  288. Dell by mowph · · Score: 1
    Dell's low price point doesn't come from bulk discounts. Any major PC manufacturer gets these. What makes them cheaper than, say, IBM or Sony is:
    • Very limited research budget - Dell doesn't waste money inventing new technology when they can just "borrow" it.
    • Very effective inventory control - They normally have no more than a day's parts on hand and thus no need for warehouses.
    • Manufacture to order - Each PC is ordered before it is built, thus there is no risk from advance manufacturing.
    • Direct Sales - No shops and no need to store manufactured systems.

    I seem to remember Dell making press releases about shipping systems with Linux, but their store page is currently down with technical difficulties so I can't take a look. I'll consider the fact that their "Technical Difficulty Encountered" page says how they use Genuine Microsoft (R) Windows (tm) to be a bad sign.

    1. Re:Dell by len_harms · · Score: 1

      Their research budget is small. But they probably have a large say in what is coming next. For years they have just been buying OEM parts slaping them together and putting 'DELL' on them.

      Their inventory control is just simply pushed up to their suppliers. They pay for it one way or another. For the suppliers will just pass the cost along...

      The built just for you computer is sometimes a bad thing. Orderd a server in Dec. It just showed up in mid Feb. Good thing I didnt need that server RIGHT away.

      They were making waves that they want to set up shops like gateway has. Gateway does the same sort of thing though. You buy a computer in their store. Guess what they just walk you through the forms on their web site. They do not keep invintory other than the display models.

      One thing I would like to add is if you go on their site. Pick between no office and office its about the price off the shelf for office. Not the 20-30 bucks it costs them. Same for home and pro for xp. They charge the 'difference' between the two of 99 dollars. Dell does not typicaly pass this cost on to the consumer unless you press them.

    2. Re:Dell by iamweezman · · Score: 0
      Their inventory control is just simply pushed up to their suppliers. They pay for it one way or another. For the suppliers will just pass the cost along...

      Just In Time delivery, the method Dell uses to order from their suppliers, is a savings. Sure Dell pays for it, but they pay a lot less for it then, say, HP pays in comparison. Go to a warehouse, see how it is for those that don't use a JIT inventory system. It's a proven system.

    3. Re:Dell by len_harms · · Score: 1

      Not saying its a BAD system. The cost is just moved from dell to the supplier. There are probably many large buildings near Dell that hold all the stuff that Dell has not bought yet but probably will.

      I have looked at many dells on the inside. Some of the parts have date stamps on em. Usually it is about 1 to 2 months before I even configured the system. Those parts had to be sitting somewhere. If pushing the storage of this equipment saves Dell money the manufacturer will pass that along in the total cost of the thing they made. It may not SAY 'storage fee' on the invoice. It will just cost 30 cents extra per unit. For the manufacture needs to take care of that stuff. Its part of the marginal cost per unit they sell to Dell.

      Dells saving is more along the lines of the manufacture HAS to store the things anyway before they sell it to anyone. So Dell orders just what it needs, and needs less people watching it. This however can lead to 'shortages' and hicups in the line. Along the lines of wooops no more 30 gig hard drives. Have to wait for it. The customer will suffer for ANY sort of hicup like that and it does happen...

  289. Think again about the iBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iBook is not such a bad idea. The price difference between Apple and Wintel is not really that big in that segment of the market. They have all those connections you want and decent battery life, and they run Linux pretty nicely.

  290. battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want long battery life, don't even bother with PCs unless you want to carry around ten pounds of stuff. A Mac is the only option.

  291. Dell does sell laptops without MS tax ! by audionoom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hi,

    I live in Belgium, Europe - and I tried calling every - Toshiba, Sony, Compaq, Dell, Mac, Acer, Siemens, ... - laptop manufacturer, and only Dell was willing to sell me one without a payment for the OS.

    Typically - the salesperson or manager would go like "your computer will not work without Win XP" or something like that ; I confronted them that I would never be using the installed XP OS and so on, and every time when I stated that I wanted to run Linux on it, or eventually - that I already had a legal copy of Win 2000 that was just fine for me to install - they would switch me to another operator higher in the "chain of command" ...
    There - I learnt that because of OEMs with MS, they were not allowed to sell a laptop without an MS license, unless the quantity would be > 1000 pieces.

    So - I figured that Dell would be the nicest of them, considering their ads state they uncercut competition :)

    I kept calling there, and after four times hearing the same song that my computer is useless without Windows OS (go figure), I got connected to this person who was willing to send and sell me a laptop without OS - meaning I got a +/- 150$ discount on the machine.

    So - I called back all the other companies - being a pain in the ass that I normally am in such situations - and tell them about Dell doing this favour for me. While before, they were stating to me that absolutely "NO" company whatsoever would be giving me a discount -some companies ( Toshiba, Compaq) stated that there were plans for doing so within six months, and talks were ongoing, since apparently I was not the only one to call in with questions like this ...

    One fun detail though : when I received my shipment with my shiny Inspiron 8200 - Win XP was installed, and !!! the official DELL CD with the OS backup thing to reinstall, was included as well, meaning I got an official copy so to speak.
    All the same - on my invoice - there was clearly a mention of the fact that I got a 150$ discount for not wanting the OS installed on it :)

    So - apparently, from what I heard from the salesperson when I contacted him again on the matter of the included CD - they are obliged at Dell to send the laptop with the Windows installed, because that is their check to see if all the hardware is performing right ...
    And it probably would have costed them more even in manhours to remove it again, once installed.

    It is strange though - that they were still sending the CD along :?

    My recommendation - bug every company as much as you can to sell you one without OS. Then - if they don't want to - tell them that they leave you no other choice than buying with the competition (be sure to mention the model you wanted to buy from them - I used to think I heard the salesperson's hair getting up from shrinking profits :))

    If nothing works- go to Dell.com - tell them explicitly you don't want an OS installed, and try several times until you get a person who is willing to help you ...

    BTW - I did this not so long ago for a company as well, and they got a discount too, for not installing the OS ; this one was blank however, no Win installed, and no CD's either ; there was a DOS disk included though - which also struck me as weird, but hey - another 150$ discount made it a good day :)

    Good luck :P

    --
    Knowledge first. Social contact later.
    1. Re:Dell does sell laptops without MS tax ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy is absolutely correct. I work for Gateway, and if someone wanted a machine with NO os - we're likely to just deduct the MS tax (~100 for XP home, ~180 for XP Pro) and send em the machine anyway. It's just too much hassle for a major system builder to make a special request for a machine to have no OS. Even if they'd do it (which I doubt), it would take forever to recieve the product because of the "custom" order.

  292. Re:Unique reason to choose iBook/Powerbook (really by afantee · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Don't be so rude if you can read properly, idiot. The guy said:

    "Currently I'm looking at an iBook; however, they're a bit larger and heavier than I'd like."

    so he is use the iBook as a benchmark and hasn't found anything better yet. Where the fuck do you get that idea that he has ruled out the iBook?

  293. Re: Apple *did* have the first touchpad by rknop · · Score: 1

    System Preferences->Mouse->Trackpad

    Uncheck the 'clicking' checkbox and/or the 'dragging' one.

    Job done! That was easy, eh?

    If it were my laptop, sure. But I don't like touchpads anyway, and so wouldn't buy a laptop that's got one. When I'm borrowing somebody else's (or otherwise using somebody else's, e.g. to show a third party how to download his OpenOffice.org presentation and show it), it would be highly impolite to go in and play with system settings.

    -Rob

  294. Netlux by flicman · · Score: 1

    I know I'm a little late to the party, but I purchased a laptop from Netlux a year and a half ago and in their configuration section chose "No OS." and that's exactly what I got.

    I had to confirm this on a phone call with a rep a day or so later because I'm pretty sure they had to reformat the OS, but since they just build them there, they could hold onto the CD and the license and use it on another machine.

    Long story short, I didn't pay for a copy of windows that I was just going to pirate anyway (linux free? only if your time is worth nothing) and ended up with a solid machine upon which I'm writing this post via 802.11b connection. The only thing it doesn't have is firewire, and I'll bet even that's available if you're willing to pay for technology that still hasn't gone mainstream and probably never will.

  295. check out these guys: by Ghostx13 · · Score: 0

    http://emperorlinux.com
    You can either buy one of there pre-configured laptops with linux (no you don't have to pay for the windows license, unless you want to dual boot with windows) or you can buy a laptop and they will install linux for you. I've never purchased anything from them, but I've considered it (decided to buy off of e-bay and install bsd myself), but the e-mails I sent to them with questions about their products were promptly replied to, and with good, tech-info rich answers, not some sales weasle-ease.

  296. I had this same quandry... by nule.org · · Score: 1
    and finally I gave in and bought the iBook. I haven't had it long enough to say that it was a great or terrible decision, but so far I am pleased. The weight and size are right on. The speed is plenty - you can get a faster laptop, but this isn't ment to be a gaming machine. In fact because it can't play the latest games means I'm more likely to do work on it, which is why I bought it. And with a price point of well under a grand (mine, the 600, was on clearance for around $850), it's far gentler on your wallet than anything I've seen smaller than it.

    On top of all this, it just feels right. The design is clean with a keyboard that is comfortable to use and a mouse pad that doesn't suck (any more than any other laptop mouse). The speakers sound good, the screen is great, and the battery life kicks ass (4 hours, easy).

    Currently I'm sticking with OS X 10.2 - it runs Perl and Python just fine and that's what I spend most of my work life doing. At some point I'll probably get frustrated with a proprietary system and put Gentoo on the thing.

    Anyway - good luck on your purchasing decision. Don't discount the iBook too quickly, it's a solidly built work-horse, and it's sexy. :)

    1. Re:I had this same quandry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out

      http://www.powernotebooks.com/index.php3

      a couple of my friends have gotten their laptops from there and were very satisfied -- that site also has really high marks at

      www.resellerratings.com

  297. "I will not purchase Windows!" by forged · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's fine, you can always steal it. We won't tell anything ;)

  298. These folks are professionals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.powernotebooks.com/

    No hassles, no Windows unless you want it and they are a pleasure to deal with.

  299. How long before by Zelet · · Score: 1

    I have heard a lot of great things about Apple here. I have an iBook and love it. My problem is - with all of this new attention how long do you think it is going to be before MS kills off Office for Mac (essentially killing Apple)?

    --
    ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    1. Re:How long before by afantee · · Score: 1

      What makes you think MS Office is that important? It's only one of more than 5000 native OS X applications, and not even Cocoa, for God's sake.

      Personally, I much prefer AppleWorks or even TextEdit, and only use Office once every few weeks when I have to. The damn thing is over bloated with over 400 MB, and feels sluggish even with small documents. Now Apple has just released Keynote and Safari, which according to most review beat the pants off PowerPoint and IE, so clearly Apple doesn't rely on MS to survive.

      What people keep forgetting is that Apple does produce cool software as well, and in many case better ones than MS: Mac OS X, FileMaker Pro, FinalCut Pro, DVD Studio, WebObjects, iLife, Newton OS, AppleWorks, Shake, QuickTime, Darwin Streaming Server, Project Builder, Interface Builder. And it shouldn't surprise anyone if Apple annouce an Office killer within a year or two based on AppleWorks or something entirely new.

    2. Re:How long before by Zelet · · Score: 1

      You have a point. but it is wrong.

      Try telling your boss that AppleWorks is just as good as MS Office. Watch him laugh when you tell him that TextEdit is just as good.

      I feel the same way that you do. But people are too stuck on Office to go with anything else. When Apple can come out with an Office Suite who's filters are 100% accurate then there wont be a problem. Until then - MS Office is a huge part of what is helping Apple stay alive.

      Look at Linux - why isn't it used on the desktop as much as even Apple? Because when I have to turn in an Assignment I don't know if the OpenOffice filter is going to work or not - so I boot up my Win2000 box and use Office there.

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    3. Re:How long before by afantee · · Score: 1

      I am not saying AppleWorks is enough, but Safari is replacing IE and Keynote will beat PowerPoint on the Mac. As far as I can see, Office is far from the main reason let alone the only one that people buy Apple computers. In fact many people switch to Mac just to avoid paying MS tax.

      With X11, Java, OpenOffice, Safari, Keynote and thousands of cool native OS X apps, MS becomes less and less relevent on the Mac. If MS resorts to its usual dirty tricks, Apple has at least two weapons to retaliate: release OS X on x86 or make AppleWorks fully compatible with MS Office. In combination with Linux and other open source projects, OS X on x86 could finally break the MS monoply.

    4. Re:How long before by gerardrj · · Score: 1
      In combination with Linux and other open source projects, OS X on x86 could finally break the MS monoply.

      How would a combination of LInux and OS X break the Microsoft monopoly? OS X and Linux are two diametrically opposed things, you either run Linux and some bunch of other libraries and apps for a complete OS, or you run OS X. You can't run Linux and OS X at the same time, and you can't interchange them.

      As I've argued before, Linux itself is not ever going to have any effect on Microsoft because the public doesn't care about the kernel that runs their machine, they care about the applications, user interface and device compatibility/interoperability. Linux has nothing to do with any of that.

      And releasing OS X on Intel/AMD hardware would kill Apple. Without hardware sales, Apple would die. They would have to resort to a draconian licensing "central server" system like XP to prevent 50% piracy rates.
      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  300. Linux magazines.... by OptimoosePrime · · Score: 1

    Grab a Linux Journal or some other Linux mag. They usually have ads for this type of thing.

    --
    796F75617265616E65726400
  301. ROFL! by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    Now what if they insured you that you also were not getting six months free AOL dial-up access, and instead of not getting XP Pro you they assured you that they were leaving out Win2000 Enterprise Edition and Office Professional Developers Edition ... I think for an extra $500 I could probably hook that up.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  302. Buy used, you're still buying MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't seem to have very special requirements so why are you tripping on speed? So what's wrong with a G3, 800MHz iBook? Stop making such a fucking big deal out of your petty little laptop purchase and go get an iBook and shut the fuck up.

  303. Try a Sager! by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    Check out PCTorque.com or Powernotebooks (as has already been mentioned). I got my Sager at PCTorque, and couldn't be happier with the service and the product. The laptop I got was a beast, but came with all the latest and greatest (including your firewire, et. al., and 802.11b). And it runs linux like a dream, with practically everything supported and loaded from the get-go (Mandrake, of course). The only problem I can see is the weight -- http://pctorque.com/comparenotebooks.html has a page listing some dimensions, and so forth, and the lightest 'book from Sager is 7lbs. However, that page also says that 802.11b isn't available on that model, and it IS.
    The forums on these sites have specific linux posts (and posting areas FOR linux posts, which is nice).
    You CAN choose to have Windows shipped with the thing, in various incarnations, but the default is NO os.

    They're a good, good place to do business with.

  304. There's plenty of no OS laptop companies by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    I can think of 3 off the top of my head

    1. Re:There's plenty of no OS laptop companies by Moofie · · Score: 1

      ....and?

      Wow, did you like stay up all night trying to come up with the most useless post ever?

      Knowledge locked in YOUR head is useless.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  305. Not Just Apple. by PAPPP · · Score: 2, Informative

    In a similar direction to buying an iBook/Powerbook from Apple, there is another non-x86 option, Buying a UltraSPARC (sun) based laptop from Tadpole Computers that runs Solaris. In my search for a laptop earlier this year, I did eventually give up and pay the M$tax. I do run windows on it, (just not the version it came with), and Linux, and BeOS, and hopefully soon Solaris x86 too. It seems that OSless x86 laptops don't really exist anymore, but you do have two other options. (Although both are a bit pricey).

  306. Firewire by luzrek · · Score: 1
    If you mean IEEE 1394 compliant connectors, then the official name for the standard is FireWire.

    Actually no, the official name for said protocol is IEEE 1394. Apple uses the brand name Firewire and Sony uses the brand name I-Link.

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    1. Re:Firewire by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Not any more. Apple licensed the Firewire name for free to the IEEE. So now it's officially Firewire, although Sony still uses the i.Link branding.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    2. Re:Firewire by luzrek · · Score: 1

      When did this happen? According to the IEEE homepage, it is still IEEE 1394 (tm) on Feb 5, 2003. Anyway, my point is that IEEE 1394 is actually more inclusive than the label Firewire. All Firewire is IEEE 1394, but all IEEE 1394 is not Firewire. Therefore the original about "what the heck is 1394?" was incorrect. I will conceed however, that anyone who actually knows anything about that protocol should recognize both names (and I-Link) since they are all the same.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    3. Re:Firewire by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Actually that's incorrect. You are thinking of SB1394, which is much more restrictive than the IEEE1394 spec (And not quite interoperable). For interoperability IEEE1394=Firewire=i.Link!=SB1394.

      And has the IEEE updated recently? IIRC the Apple licensing thing happened quite recently.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
  307. Buy an off-lease Dell by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you go to www.dfsdirectsales.com -- not the Dell outlet site, but the Dell Financial Services direct sales site -- you'll find systems that Dell leased out, and has since taken back. Because Windows was "licensed" to the original user and cannot be transferred, these systems are all sold without operating systems! (The Microsoft tax has already been paid; you don't have to pay it again.)

    I don't think you're to beat a 12 inch iBook or Powerbook for small and light, though, and if "[p]erformance isn't a major concern," why are you worried about it enough to rule out a Mac?

    --
    Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
  308. my 2 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You're complaining about the ~$50 "tax" for Windows? Hardly seems worth worrying about in the context of a machine worth >= $2000.

    I'd rather buy from a well-respected laptop manufacturer which offers me good support, a good warranty, and good components even if it means that I have to pay the $50 or so "tax" for Windows. (You'll also get your first legal copy of Windows. :)

  309. Pointing devices by FlyGirl · · Score: 1

    I never understood how anybody liked EITHER of them (the eraser or the touchpad). I always prefered the mini-trackball. I had an NEC laptop in 1997 that had a trackball on the front and still wish I had a pointing device like that on a laptop. It was the only device that I felt I had any degree of precision with.

  310. Desknotes by luzrek · · Score: 1
    While it is not smaller or lighter than a powerbook, it is much cheaper. Take a look at the internal battery versions of the Desknote line of notebooks by Northgate. When I bought mine it shipped with Linux and I did not pay the so-called Microsoft tax. Unfortunately I'm not sure if there is a version with 802.11b support.

    Alternatively the Alienware Area 51m has gotten very high marks in performance tests (well beyond comperably priced desktops of both the PC and Mac varieties). It's price is comperable to a Powerbook.

    On a completely different subject, I'm supprised you are so against paying the Microsoft tax but are perfectly happy to pay the Apple Tax. While Apple does not have a monopoly, it's business practices have been much more anticompetative. The main results of this are the lack of software titles for Mac OS's, the lack of Mac OS's for non-Apple hardware, and the lack of non-Apple hardware for Mac OS's. I can remember a brief period when Motorola (and some others) manufactured computers running the Mac OS's. Apple revoked the licences for this quickly, supposedly because they wanted to retain control over the whole product, but it was also clear that the Motorola hardware was much better than the Apple hardware.

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  311. iBook by cluening · · Score: 1

    About 6 months ago I was looking for the perfect laptop: I wanted a Unixy OS, but I also wanted all of the features of the hardware to work (sleep, sound, modem, wireless, etc.). After much pondering and digging, I got an iBook. OSX Just Works(tm) with the hardware (as you would expect), is a lot of fun to use, and can run all of my X apps, console apps, and most anything else I need without much effort. But the big thing I really liked is that all of the hardware worked without spending a month grabbing kernel patches, fighting with modules, and trying giving up on various bits. Also, the iBook is nice and small (smaller than any of my friends and collegues laptops), has a good enough screen resolution, and is fairly powerful for laptop needs.

    Of course, you can also wipe it off and put Linux on it. But, as a testament to OSX, let me say that not a single piece of hardware I own is running anything from Micros~1 - most everything is running Linux (or PalmOS, etc.) - and the iBook is the only one of the machines (beyond the ones that can't handle it) that havn't been overwritten with Linux.

    So, in the end I recommend the iBook you mentioned at the beginning.

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
  312. I tried a Sager! by PAPPP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are a few problems with Sager. 1.Those things are expensive compared to the big retailers. 2. M$ noticed the no OS option, and it sadly, is gone, it happened while I was shopping for a notebook, and they had a "according to the new Microsoft volume licensing we are no longer able to offer Systems without Microsoft Windows" sort of message up for a few days. 3. He said small, Sager doesn't make small laptops (smallest is a 14.1"@about 7lbs)

  313. Don't just dismiss the iBook by i0wnzj005uck4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I actually have two iBooks, one running pure OS X and one running Yellowdog. Let me tell you, Yellowdog on an iBook is a sweet thing. When it comes down to it, you want a full-featured laptop that's easy on the wallet. That R505 vaio is cute, but the screen's tiny and it uses an external CD drive. On top of that, regardless of what the specs say its battery life is only about 3-3.5 hours. The iBooks I have get an average of 4 hours per full charge (I get damned close to five if I'm careful, sometimes).

    On top of that, the apple hardware is, as many other slashdotters have mentioned, pretty high quality. I bought my first iBook because a friend of mine accidentally shoved his out of a second story window. The battery shot out, but he put it back in and, aside from a few scratches on the case, it worked fine. Plus, you can find a dual-usb with firewire ibook for under a thou these days, with a CDRW if you're lucky. The emperorlinux guys are selling machines for twice that without a removable media drive.

    Also, the thing about Mac Linux being closer to the hardware is true. Unlike installing Redhat on my PC, I didn't have to screw around with source tarballs to get my hardware to work. Just a thought if you like things to be easy.

    --
    - Cloud
  314. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    You can buy off-the-shelf parts from multiple vendors and assemble a system capable of running MacOS unmodified.
    Really? I was under the impression that Macs used an apple designed memory controller, which was required by the OS. Perhaps you could point me in the direction of a supplier of DIY apple kit, prefereably one based in the UK.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  315. Qli Linux PCs by srussell · · Score: 5, Informative
    Someone else has mentioned Qli Linux PCs, and I thought I'd post a personal anecdote.

    Qli sells new laptops with Linux preinstalled. Their prices range from one thousand to over two, for a fully loaded machine. They don't sell any that are tiny, like the Vaio, but there are other companies that do sell refurbished laptops and small form factor laptops with no Windows tax. I chose Qli because I was looking for a particular feature set, and because one of their installation options is Gentoo, which is my current favorite distribution.

    I got an 1800MHz, 512MB (2GB max), 15.1" LCD, 20Gb, DVD/CDRW laptop for a shade over $1800. It has onboard ethernet, three USB (one of which is USB 2.0), onboard firewire, and a single CardBus slot. It was, practically, the perfect configuration I was looking for; the price was reasonable, and (as I said) they offered Gentoo as an install option.

    My experience with Qli has been good. I agreed that they would install Gentoo 1.4, which is technically still beta, and this was Qli's first 1.4 laptop, so I had to do some work after the machine arrived to get it fully configured. I would expect that if you chose Gentoo 1.2, Mandrake, or Redhat, it would arrive fully configured. Qli provides a large number of installation options, and money you pay for the distribution of your choice (which varies) goes to the distribution.

    The best thing about Qli, IME, was the customer service. The staff are extremely knowledgable and helpful, and are good about responding to support requests. They have a good understanding of kernel configurations, from which kernel modules are required to support which features to various configuration options.

    I'm also very happy with the hardware. Although it isn't yet supported by Linux, I was pleasantly surprised that the laptop came with an unadvertised MMC/SD slot.

    There are a couple of hangups with my particular hardware, but none of it is Qli's fault. The laptop is entirely ACPI, and ACPI support in Linux is immature. Consequently, I can't suspend the laptop (!) -- yet. OpenGL is proved to be a bear to get working, but this is due to my choice of distributions; apparently, Redhat on this laptop has full accellerated GL support out of the box. There is an onboard WinModem, but we know about those.

    In summary, I can recommend Qli. You need to evaluate your own requirements, and then send them an email before you buy. They'll give you status reports on various configurations and recommend a system for you.

    [Disclaimer] I do not work for Qli, and I don't receive any compensation for recommending them. My only relationship with Qli is that I've recently purchased a laptop from them.

    1. Re:Qli Linux PCs by X-Nc · · Score: 1
      The best thing about Qli, IME, was the customer service.
      I have to second this. I have a laptop & 1U server through them and the HW quality is solid and the support is outstanding.
      --
      --
      If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
  316. +1 geeky humor - nut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no useful text -- please ignore this this is only to avoid the lameness filter because i guess this is really pretty lame i wish the lameness filter was never added to slashdot it makes people do this lame crap when posting something lame and it doesn't prevent people from posting lame crap anyway so why have it at all

    1. Re:+1 geeky humor - nut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U R Lame.

  317. Vobis, or Dell. by Jens · · Score: 2, Informative
    Whenever I see an advert I tend to phone them and ask for laptops for my business. Just for the fun of it, I'll go through the whole order process and just before the end when it comes to software, I say "none". I want the laptops blank. Usually, that's the end of it... but the more people do this, the more the companies will notice there is a need for blank laptops.

    Vobis (www.vobis.de) sells blank machines. They come with "PC DOS 2000" preinstalled which is just a lame excuse for not violating the MS gag agreement. The XP preinstalled models are 100.- more expensive.

    Dell doesn't claim they do, but for corporate customers they do sell some of their machines without preinstalled OS, and they are cheaper than the regular ones. At least I found this out when I phoned Dell Germany some months ago... they actually transferred me to somebody who claimed he'd be able to sell me a laptop without pre-installed software.

    Perhaps that helps. Otherwise, buy a Powerbook. ;)

  318. Re:800 x 600? Nooooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Guy must be a web designer.

    I cannot get my web designer wife to see the logic against 800x600. "The _modal_ number of people still use 800x600; therefore, I _must_ think in 800x600. She can't see that the curve is skewed. There are plenty of persons using resolutions (way) above 1024x768 and almost nobody still flaying themselves at 640x480. So designing for 800x600 means the pages will be suboptimal for way _more_ people than they are pleasing if they would just design for 1024x768.

    Web designers of the world: Throw off your chains of 800x600 opression and breath in the liberation of the free and open spaces of 1024x768!

  319. Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could look at apples notebooks. OSx is Unix, can run X11, can run linux apps. The hardware is sweet, the sleep / instant on works perfectly.

  320. Thinkpad - it's a no-brainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would suggest that you want an X series IBM thinkpad, these can be purchased with Linux pre-installed on them and have all of the expansion that you require built in.

  321. Novatech by ClockworkPlanet · · Score: 1

    Novatech, our local PC outlet, will sell you a laptop (or any PC for that matter) with no OS on it.

    --
    Now wash your hands.
  322. Experiance with QLI by fuzzykitty · · Score: 1

    I purchased two laptops from QLI mid and end of last year, their EM3000 and former Emperor 2. The quality of the laptop construction in excellent and they perform very well for numeric computation, CAD, and a few games. I too have found their support to be second to none, this is most likely because they are a small company. If you have any questions give them a call and they will be happy to help.

  323. Windows "Rescue" partitions by McFly777 · · Score: 1
    I believe that this will be the case with any oem install of windows. IIRC Microsoft made it a requirement of the OEM pricing that the consumer does not receive an official windows CD (which could presumably be installed on a different machine easily).

    The oem may provide means of backup, on another partition, or write to a bunch of floppies or CD etc, but these wind up as corrupted versions of windows that are tailored to the specific machine, without the full install capibilities etc.

    --

    McFly777
    - - -
    "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  324. I sell notebooks pre-loaded with whatever you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.scronline.com

    unforunately, most of mine aren't very small. They aren't exactly heavy, but they aren't small. I only have 1 with a 12.1 display. Regardless, I'd be more than happy to sell any of my notebooks loaded with linux or whatever else you want if it will support the notebook. I'll also preload our desktops with linux. I'm an MS OEM, but to me, custom built system means you get it the way you want it as long as the hardware you choose supports it.

  325. If all you want is the Hardware... by chmod+u+s · · Score: 2, Informative
    There are actually only 5 major laptop manufacturers in the world. Everybody else is a Value Added Reseller.

    If you don't want to pay the windows tax (Or the HP/Dell/etc. markup). Go to a source that is closer to the manufatcurer. For example, Compal is one of the larger actual laptop manufacturers - they supply HP, and toshiba, among others. If you want their hardware, find a smaller VAR for their Compal. E.g. Sceptre, Chembook, etc. All the majors do is just change the looks slightly and bundle the hardware with software and support.

    The smaller the VAR, the smaler the markup (generally). You can configure the machine as you like, and you can buy them without an OS.

    That being said, my most recent laptop purchase was from www.discountlaptops.com - and I didn't pay the windows tax. There are many of places you can find *just* the hardware - you just have to look.

  326. 12" Apple PowerBook; bad screen, high heat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    FWIW, I've been seeing reviews that claim the 12" PowerBooks have problems with heat dissipation (scorches your lap) and a screen with poor resolution.

    I'd look at the 15" PowerBooks instead...

  327. Prostar Laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.amazinglaptops.com/specials.html

    The 2794 is $1194 with 1.6 GHz P4, 256MB, 40GB HDD, 64MB Shared AGP video, 14.1" 1024x768, DVD, 4 USB, 1 IEEE 1394, Modem, ethernet. No OS Standard, optional Windows XP ($75). May be too heavy at 6.5 pounds.

    There are other places that sell these, so might find a better deal if you look around. I've seen these rebranded and sold in local computer shops (with XP on them standard, but could get no OS for less $$).

  328. The Laptop Solution by Netmonger · · Score: 1

    Here is your solution:

    http://www.thinkpad.com

    They're solid.. innovative.. light.. Linux-friendly and the support is GREAT. I wont consider anything else.

    --
    -- NeTMoNGeR
    1. Re:The Laptop Solution by leed_25 · · Score: 1

      In the offerings I saw, you had to select one of a menu of M$ operating systems. Admittedly, I did not poke through all the nooks and crannies of the site looking for a way to specify no-O/S or linux; I did get the feeling, though, that you ignored one of the constraints of the problem, and here I quote:

      "Here's the catch: I will not purchase Windows!" "

  329. Buy a Mac powerbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buy a MAC Powerbook

  330. Re:Knoppix. by Fratz · · Score: 1

    Great idea if they let you :) Also keep in mind the machine may work with Linux but not with the Knoppix boot CD, so don't give up if that doesn't help. Over the weekend I used Knoppix in two machines that I know to be Linux-compatible, yet each machine had problems (one wouldn't even boot Knoppix).

    --
    -- Fratz, human
  331. Mac OSX' GUI Sucks. by g_bit · · Score: 1
    The Apple comes with an actual GUI far superior to Microsoft Windows

    Ahem.

    Do you really think you can make a statement like that and get away with it? Why don't you list the ways that the Apple GUI is far superior to Windows instead of TROLLING like that?

    Yeah, I like having all of my menus at the top of the screen all of the time. OSX Rocks. Drag the CDRom to the trashcan to eject? That's a great one.

    Get a grip on yourself, Steve Jobs won't be your friend just because you really, really want to suck his dick.

    1. Re:Mac OSX' GUI Sucks. by Fzz · · Score: 1
      Drag the CDRom to the trashcan to eject? That's a great one.

      Actually the moment you click on the CDRom, the trashcan icon changes to an eject logo, so Apple have listened to this particular criticism.

      Many years ago, a friend of mime once accidentally dragged an NFS mounted Unix filesystem to the trashcan on her Mac instead of the floppy she was trying to eject. Can you say "rm -rf *"? Not a happy camper.

      - Fzz

    2. Re:Mac OSX' GUI Sucks. by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1
      The Apple comes with an actual GUI far superior to Microsoft Windows
      Ahem.
      Do you really think you can make a statement like that and get away with it? Why don't you list the ways that the Apple GUI is far superior to Windows instead of TROLLING like that?

      Well, I expected I could make a statement like that. Normally when I'm writing an opinion piece I expect to state my opinions in clear and concise language which is exactly what I did. If you don't agree with my opnion, then state why instead of accusing me of being an Apple troll.

      Why am I supposed to change my writing style to be more passive agressive and avoid offending somebody? Isn't the burden normally on the reader to decide what is fact and what is opinion? Or has the world become a place now where everybody is lulled into thinking all that is said is supposed to be fact?

      Yeah, I like having all of my menus at the top of the screen all of the time. OSX Rocks. Drag the CDRom to the trashcan to eject? That's a great one.

      Well, despite what some people say about the menubar, I think it's an excellent idea. NeXT actually had a movable menu (not a bar), but that would probably be way too confusing for the typical Mac user to understand, not to mention PC users like yourself who would probably freak out at something like that. That and classic stuff still definitely needs a menubar, and it might have been hard to write carbon with a NeXT style menu instead of a menubar.

      The trashcan problem you mentioned has never existed in OS X. I assume you just spouted off some random Apple FUD hoping to make it stick. All versions of OS X change the trashcan to an eject icon whenever you would be unmounting a file system. It changes as soon as you start dragging, so it's pretty damn obvious what you need to do. The same behavior is also used for other types of mounted filesystems including networked mounts.

      Get a grip on yourself, Steve Jobs won't be your friend just because you really, really want to suck his dick.

      Well, if I was gay, I probably would suck Steve Jobs's dick. Then I could say "HEY! I sucked Steve Jobs's dick!" That would be great! Do you really think he would be my frined if I did that?

      Man, get a grip on yourself. I can't even believe all of the hostility towards Apple and Apple users. Well, yes I can, this is Slashdot so you get the people like yourself who can't stand the fact that someone might actually own something that works better.

    3. Re:Mac OSX' GUI Sucks. by g_bit · · Score: 1
      If you don't agree with my opinion, then state why instead of accusing me of being an Apple troll.

      Okay, here's a list of reasons why OSX is not FAR SUPERIOR to Windows:

      1. Why should I have to drag ANYTHING to eject or disconnect a mounted drive? That is stupid and here's why: It's NOT OBVIOUS. Why can't I just press the button on the cd-rom drive like a normal human being? Oh, now you're going to tell me that the new G4's have an eject button. Great! What about the guy with the NFS Share that got deleted below?? In Windows, you right-click and choose Disconnect. In Windows, you right-click something to get a list of available options. This makes too much sense for backwards ass Mac Users.
      2. The Dock. It's too big and it's a waste of cpu time.
      3. It's slow. Don't lie to me I've tried it plenty of times.
      4. The Dock supports task switching from the keyboard, but incredibly, only in the order that applications appear in the dock. Which is next to useless. - The Reg Task switching in Windows is easy, Alt+Tab to go forwards, Alt+Shift+Tab to go backwards.
      5. The folder browser shows you items inside of a folder when you expand a folder instead of just showing you the contents on the right pane.
      6. And, of course, limited support without third-party software for multi-button mice.
      Far Superior my ass, more like Grossly Inferior. And that's just the GUI nevermind the fact that it's tied to proprietary hardware and Apple fakes all of their benchmarks to make it seem like Photoshop runs quicker or something (it doesn't, I have proof, if you want it let me know). I can't even believe all of the hostility towards Apple and Apple users.

      Oh, and Windows users aren't supposed to take offense at the average small minded Mac users' passive-aggressive statements like The Apple comes with an actual GUI far superior to Microsoft Windows...??? Yeah, you read Slashdot a whole lot and still think that's not a TROLL? Good one.

      ...someone might actually own something that works better.

      Umm, yeah as we've seen OSX works a lot better. It works so much better that a whole 3% of the worlds desktop computer users use it on a daily basis.

    4. Re:Mac OSX' GUI Sucks. by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1
      If you don't agree with my opinion, then state why instead of accusing me of being an Apple troll.
      Okay, here's a list of reasons why OSX is not FAR SUPERIOR to Windows:

      Well, still so much hostility I see.

      1. Why should I have to drag ANYTHING to eject or disconnect a mounted drive? That is stupid and here's why: It's NOT OBVIOUS. Why can't I just press the button on the cd-rom drive like a normal human being? Oh, now you're going to tell me that the new G4's have an eject button. Great! What about the guy with the NFS Share that got deleted below?? In Windows, you right-click and choose Disconnect. In Windows, you right-click something to get a list of available options. This makes too much sense for backwards ass Mac Users.

      You don't have to drag anything to unmount a drive. Aside from the traditional drag and drop method you can also bring up the context (what you call right-click) menu and select Eject. You can also click the object to select it and use the Eject choice from the file menu which is accessible (like the right-click menu), but more importantly visible, at all times. If those methods aren't enough, most modern Macs do have an eject button in one form or another as you noted.

      2. The Dock. It's too big and it's a waste of cpu time.

      Actually, I like the huge Dock. Of course, I also like the big NeXT Dock that it comes from, so apparently there is at least some element of personal preference here.

      3. It's slow. Don't lie to me I've tried it plenty of times.

      This is very subjective. I can say without lying that the Dual G4-1Ghz I use at work is no slouch at all. My G4-500 on the other hand is showing its age, but that hardly has anything to do with the operating system. I personally feel it is smoother than Windows or Linux on equivalent x86 hardware, but it's very hard to prove something like this one way or the other. And benchmarks are only sure to lead you further astray. To me, unless a system is slow to the point of being unusable, it's plenty fast.

      4. The Dock supports task switching from the keyboard, but incredibly, only in the order that applications appear in the dock. Which is next to useless. - The Reg Task switching in Windows is easy, Alt+Tab to go forwards, Alt+Shift+Tab to go backwards.

      You didn't even describe the Microsoft Windows cycling behavior properly. I remember learning of this feature years ago (back when I was a Windows 3.1 and OS/2 user and hated Macs). It's not behavior that can be easily described in an understandable way. The basics of it are that Alt-Tab will go forward through the cycle, and alt-shift-tab will go backward through the cycle (so long as you always continue to hold down alt). Whenever you release alt to complete it, the order of applications in the cylce is actually changed such that Alt-Tab will take you to the previous application. Useful? Yeah, you bet, once you get the hang of it it's great! But you can hardly say that simply cycling through an unchanging list is not easy or is useless. It works just fine and you always know which way you are going. Pressing Cmd-Tab will always cycle you towards the right (forward) in the dock, and Cmd-Shift-Tab will always cycle you to the left (backward).

      5. The folder browser shows you items inside of a folder when you expand a folder instead of just showing you the contents on the right pane.

      Again, another item where there is an element of personal preference. I have found the Mac behavior to be quite intuitive, even though I was used to the Windows way. If you want to limit your view to the contents of one folder, then double click it. If you need a quicker way to navigate through many folders, try the NeXT-derived browse mode.

      6. And, of course, limited support without third-party software for multi-button mice.

      The right mouse button on my microsoft trackball works just fine. The scrollwheel also works quite well. Anything more than that requires third party software on Windows as well as Mac. I personally use it without third party software on my Mac for the same reason I use it without third party software on Windows, I simply don't require the extra functionality above and beyond what was already provided by the OS.

      Far Superior my ass, more like Grossly Inferior. And that's just the GUI nevermind the fact that it's tied to proprietary hardware and Apple fakes all of their benchmarks to make it seem like Photoshop runs quicker or something (it doesn't, I have proof, if you want it let me know).

      I don't know what to say to this. For me speed is a non-issue anyway, but the reality is the numbers can swing any way you want them to. And yes, you're right. Apple does use the numbers that make them look best.

      I can't even believe all of the hostility towards Apple and Apple users.
      Oh, and Windows users aren't supposed to take offense at the average small minded Mac users' passive-aggressive statements like The Apple comes with an actual GUI far superior to Microsoft Windows...??? Yeah, you read Slashdot a whole lot and still think that's not a TROLL? Good one.

      Well actually no. I don't expect anyone to take offense over something as silly as OS choice. Why should I? I'm not offended by your statements against the Macintosh. Your tone of voice offends me, but not your statements. I believe I have shown that many of your statements are incorrect (except a few cases where there are elements of personal preference).

      ...someone might actually own something that works better.
      Umm, yeah as we've seen OSX works a lot better. It works so much better that a whole 3% of the worlds desktop computer users use it on a daily basis.

      Err, sorry, that statement I made did quite reek of flamebait. :-(

      In my opinion, OS X has a much more consistent and usable interface than Microsoft Windows. When using it I tend to find that I can figure it out quite quickly. I also have noticed that the non-geek people around me seem to have an easier time with my Mac (which is of course anecdotal evidence). Drawing from the information I had available and weighing the qualities as I saw fit, I came to the conclusion that OS X has a "far superior" GUI.

      Sure, some elements are debatable, but so far you've only scratched the surface and pointed out the superficial differences. Many times you seemed to redefine usability in terms of "how much is it like what I've already used? (Microsoft)".

      If you want a less biased source of usability information, then I suggest you do some searching and read some papers from usability experts. The "Interface hall of shame" is always a great read now and again, as well as the hall of fame and the rest of the website around the two "halls".

      Normally the best products do not have the highest market share. Often they will in fact have a quite small market share. The only thing really holding Apple back from widespread adoption is their desire to play it safe and stay within their niche market (high-end personal computer hardware).

    5. Re:Mac OSX' GUI Sucks. by g_bit · · Score: 1
      Well, still so much hostility I see.

      Actually, I was being defensive, not hostile. Well it turns out, there's really nothing to be defensive about. Sorry for the CAPS, I was simply stating sarcastic emphasis ;)

      You can also click the object to select it and use the Eject choice ...

      Yes, I realize that these are accessible as I mentioned previously, I concede...this was a bad argument!

      I can say without lying that the Dual G4-1Ghz I use at work is no slouch at all. My G4-500 on the other hand is showing its age, but that hardly has anything to do with the operating system.

      Personally I like to use a 500-700Mhz laptop and not a dual Ghz tower just to run my OS smoothly :)

      You didn't even describe the Microsoft Windows cycling behavior properly...

      I didn't describe it as in-depth as you did, however the basic premise is what I said earlier. Geez, you are a nit-picker :)

      Regardless, you yourself said that you were just stating your opinion. Well, how can you state as a "matter of fact" that something is superior to something else when superiority is totally subjective in this case?? Well yes, that is a simple troll whether you admit it or not, and I took the bait. (I mean, look where you're posting) Shame on me for defending my favorite OS!

  332. Linux is for Cows, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for Gateway - it's no problem building a notebook or desktop with Linux, but there are two catches. 1) It can only be Red Hat (that's all our team supports) and 2) It'll cost you an extra $175 per box. CIS (Custom Integrated Services) Orders are generally more expensive. Usually we don't it unless a small business wants to run *nix and not Windows.

  333. Buy an iBook ;-) by Lispy · · Score: 1

    No M$-tax.

  334. Datorbutiken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a swedish webshop where you can configure your own laptop (almost like with dell) and you can phurcase it without any os at all.
    www.datorbutiken.com

  335. Re:Dell Rebate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm currently having to fight Dell for the last $50 CAN of my $150 rebate.

  336. You must be shitting me... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    You don't really believe that, do you?

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:You must be shitting me... by edmo · · Score: 1

      Actually I speak from experience
      Maybe it's cuz I live in a university town...

      --
      Don't save your orgasms for Heaven; Heaven knows we need them here.
  337. Re:800 x 600? Nooooo! by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I *am* a web designer, in fact... but I never run my browser fullscreen. I prefer around 640 pixels wide, to get a nice, readable 10-12 words per line. Good designers don't design for specific browser window sizes.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  338. metamatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get an IBM ThinkPad X24 or X30.

  339. Sotec 3120x - Cheap Sony clone - runs Linux by ctbarker32 · · Score: 1

    There's quite a buzz about the inexpensive Sony 505 clone called the Sotec 3120x. Avaiable at major office supply discounters for around $800. Comes with WinXP but can boot Linux. Google it and you will find many comments. Rumor has it that an update in the Spring will include built in 802.11b and USB 2.

  340. linux notebooks by fusilier · · Score: 1

    i've been researching this for quite some time. i too prefer the libretto w/ a sony in a close 2nd place. dynamism.com has some great listings. however, none of these listings are available w/o the m$ tax. therefore i will be going with the 12" ibook and will be running mdk 9.1 on it. my brother has this ibook and claims it to be a little thick for him but none-the-less an excellent do all solution. he prefers os X because he's new to the computing sceen.

  341. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  342. notebook linux by d23 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a prostar laptop. I bought it with Windows. I have a second disk that I've installed Mandrake Linux (8.0, 8.1, 9.0).
    In looking for a replacement I called prostar and they said they would sell me a machine without an OS and give me a discount of $70.
    The machine I have is pretty heavy, but they do have some lighter models.
    They're quite a bit cheaper than Dell, HP, etc..
    http://www.pro-star.com/

  343. Apple's retain value like a BMW by iamweezman · · Score: 0

    Apple's retain value like a BMW

    Now, tell me is this statement stemming from the fact that the hardware and software, are just so reliable that you rarely need to update, or the fact that a new Apple isn't more than few megahertz faster so why update?

    1. Re:Apple's retain value like a BMW by mkldev · · Score: 1

      The former. Both PC and Mac hardware have historically gotten faster at about the same rate. Macs have always held their value better. Even 68k Mac hardware still brought a decent price until... oh, Mac OS X. (You could still find Quadras selling for $200+ on eBay up until at least 1999 or 2000. That's hardware built in 1992 or so.... :-)

      The big reason Macs hold their value better is that, in general, new OS versions tend to be usable (not just bootable, but actually usable) on relatively old hardware. Mac OS X broke this for a lot of older hardware, and as a result, the resale value of said gear dropped somewhat, but anything that will run Mac OS X is still holding its value exceptionally well relative to PCs of the same vintage. Even without Mac OS X, though, older systems are still usable for many typical tasks.

      Case in point, my grandmother does word processing and email on a PM6100/66. By contrast, the typical Pentium 66 is either a closet filler, a slow router running Linux, or a boat anchor (or some combination thereof).

      Also, the hardware tends to be more robust than commodity PC hardware. Laptops and hard drives notwithstanding, I've never had a Mac fail in my care. Never. I've even used working original (1984) Mac 128s as late as 1999 or so. IBM PC jr, anyone? PC-AT? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

      In short, it's no surprise that in a study of burglars back in the late 1990s, they were several times as likely to steal a Mac as a PC.... It does more. It lasts longer. It's that simple. :-)

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    2. Re:Apple's retain value like a BMW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ISP's P133 (not 66) can saturate a T-1 with static content, while doing DNS for 50 dialup users. I used to do my homework from the terminal grepping the user logs. It's a full tower with 4 bigfoot 5 1/4" IDE hard drives, a SCSI tape backup, and an over-sized power supply, so it could easily keep a small boat moored, even in a storm. It also hosts dynamic content and used to run the front end for our billing system. I used to do my Unix homework at the terminal, practicing awk scripts on the active user logs, modem lights blinking all around me.

  344. Truck Hijacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you hijacked the truck hauling the windows laptop, would you still be paying for windows?

    Would MS still be paid for windows on the stolen boxen?

    If so, what does that mean?

  345. Tricky... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    That is a tricky case, and in all honesty I'm not sure how people set up keyboard maps to deal with that. It's been a while since I used XTerm under OSX.

    In practical use though, that issue really doesn't arise much... Terminal.app is really pretty good, and for me is a usable replacemnet for XTerms that doesn't make me miss XTerms too much... other X11 apps can be run using either Apple's X11 solution or the original, and generally don't seem to have that level of menu changing.

    I think possible one would end up mapping either the "FN" key to be CTRL, or else just make CTRL really work as CTRL (in X11) and make the FN key the modifier that makes the mouse button act as the second button.

    Don't even ask me how paste works (both buttons), it's been a while since I've used an X11 app since I got Emacs compiling under OS X.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  346. Re: Apple *did* have the first touchpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even better,

    my system has a setting that says
    "ignore trackpad while typing"

    works great!

  347. build your own laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you don't want a laptop with Windows? Fine. Buy a laptop case and put all the stuff you want in it. Harder, but there's nothing preventing you from doing it.

    1. Re:build your own laptop by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      I would be highly interested in doing this... Where can I buy a laptop case and parts though???

      --
      Luke-Jr
    2. Re:build your own laptop by a7244270 · · Score: 1

      what does your sig mean ? (666 octal)

    3. Re:build your own laptop by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      It means that the # of the beast is 666 in base 8, not 666 in base 10. For your information, the number of the beast is part of Revelations, the last book in the Bible.

      --
      Luke-Jr
    4. Re:build your own laptop by a7244270 · · Score: 1

      I knew that bit, but I was just wondering what made you think it was base 8 rather than base 10 ?

    5. Re:build your own laptop by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Well, it says pretty clearly the identity of the Antichrist when converted to another base...

      --
      Luke-Jr
  348. Get a fujitsu lifebook by HenryC · · Score: 1

    It requres that you pay an MS tax, because it is very small, debian installs without any problems, the screen runs in an excellent resolution, and it is an amazing deal.

    http://webshop.fujitsupc.com/fpc/Ecommerce/build se riesbean.do?series=P2
    (they have many others, that just happens to be the one that I purchased, and love)

    -= Henry

  349. Grammar; offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are telling the market, "either I like Windows, or, I like the hardware and care about hardware more than software."
    You are telling the market, "either I like Windows," or, "I like the hardware and care about hardware more than software."

    The difference between my statement and your statment is the reason that Microsoft spends so much to insure 100% OEM compliance.
    The difference between my statement and your statement is the reason that Microsoft spends so much to ensure 100% OEM compliance.
    You seem to say that Microsoft ensures compliance because of the difference between two statements, and not because of the statements' contents.

    ...computers without Windows is too small/unprofitable...
    ...computers without Windows will be too small/unprofitable...

    There's a obviously...
    There's obviously...

    ...a commodity and in the long...
    a commodity and, in the long...

    The others are left for the original author to contemplate.

  350. E-mail sales by yerricde · · Score: 1

    But unless the seller knows WHY you're not buying, your stand is pointless.

    Would explaining it in an essay on your web site and sending a copy to the boycotted company's sales department work?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  351. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by lspd · · Score: 1

    Game colsoles are a better comparison.
    No one disputes that Microsoft has every right to include their own software bundled with the XBox.
    What you do with it after the fact is your own business.

  352. What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where in fuck's name did you get that machine for $500? I've been looking at them, can't find them that cheap... what the hell...

  353. not paying the Micro$oft tax... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way I get around this for notebooks running Linux is to buy used - seems the used and surplus places I've seen don't sell an OS with the laptop. All the better to put Linux on it and more often then not you don't need the latest laptop (or want the latest if there are new devices and chipsets that may not be supported)

  354. Deal with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you like the VAIO (i hate them, but that's your business) then bite the bullet and format the hdd right out of the box. You will not find a good laptop like you want one without windows. Sorry, but it's just the way things are.

  355. R505 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Sony R505 and I must say it's really, really nice. However, it's not built for Linux. The docking station uses a firewire connection to the CDROM, with some tweaks to the bios, so it will boot from a CDROM but not install. I NFS-insatlled RH 8.0 but it won't boot, somethings wrong with the lo interface, and it hanges. I read that Debian is good for the 505 but I've never used it. I haven't messed with it much since. There are times I do regret not purchasing an ibook.

  356. Qli by guroove · · Score: 1

    I didn't see any replies mentioning Qli. I've been looking at the posts for a while but I still might have missed it. Does anyone have a review of these?

    website here:
    http://www.qlilinuxpc.com/

    --
    Someone stole my old sig.
  357. Previewing = Good by Landaras · · Score: 1

    First you talk about how "in Slashdot-land, there are no girlfriends."

    Then you mention one of your "heated solitaire session[s]."

    I think you might want to preview your entire post before submitting in the future ;).

  358. Dell Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is political motivation behind the purchase of computer hardware (and any such political motivation should be duly complicated by the fact almost all PC hardware is manufactured in Asain sweatshops), then Dell is probably the *last* company you want to buy from: Michael Dell, Pres. and CEO of Dell Computers, Inc., was one of GWChimp's biggest campaign contributors (if not *the* single biggest). Now is *that* where you want your money going?

    2c. from Just an...
    Anonymous Coward

    1. Re:Dell Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I was going to get a compaq, but because of your post, I am getting a dell.

    2. Re:Dell Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... because of your post, I am getting a dell

      Wha?? You actually want your money going to a chimp?

  359. paying_more == getting_more by EmperorLinux · · Score: 1

    Of course you are correct. You are paying more. And any one who has one of our
    systems will happily tell you you are getting _lots_ more. If you want all the
    challenges and headaches of getting a current-run laptop running Linux _well_,
    then by all means, please go get one and hack on! Our customers are people who
    have other jobs to do, who need a Linux notebook that _just_works_, so they can
    get their jobs done.

    They are being paid to write database code, crunch meteorological data,
    simulate the birth of the universe.

    => They don't have the _time_ to mess with setting up the OS.
    Keeping your core programmers, research physicists, and tenured astronomy Profs
    "on-task" is worth quite a bit to the people who pay them.

    --
    Lincoln D. Durey, Ph.D.
    Electrical Engineer
    EmperorLinux
  360. Microsoft contamination by Minkey+Brines · · Score: 1

    Think of dolphin-safe tuna. If you really want to be a purist on this issue, stop worrying about the can of tuna you buy at the store if you don't also worry about the tuna salad sandwich you're about to eat.

    Whatever you do, don't buy used. If you do, you're almost guaranteed to buy a system that was once purchased with Windows installed. Think of it as "Microsoft contamination."

  361. Getting Linux on Laptops... by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 1

    A suggestion for Slashdotters: even if you're not in the market for a notebook, call around your local computer shops, and ask them if they sell laptops with Linux installed. If they do, see if you'd still be charged the MS tax, ask questions, keep them talking a while.

    A meatspace version of slashdotting, and perhaps when the managers look at the meatspace version of their referrer logs, some will start selling Linux on laptops.

    --
    Fuck it
  362. www.pcsforeveryone.com in Cambridge, Mass, USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys are linux-aware and will pre-install linux, or sell you a PC with no OS installed.

    They sell a handful of laptops - this one looks cool:
    http://www.pcsforeveryone.com/listcomputers .cfm?su perkitcatID=4&catID=13&show=y

    I'm not affiliated with them - just an occasional customer.

    Cheers.

  363. Re:800 x 600? Nooooo! by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

    Depends on your needs.

    I have an 800x600 screen on my laptop (IBM 385XD, used, about $300, pretty darn GNU/Linux compatible, but about 3.5-4kg), and stretch it to 1024x768 virtual at 16-bit colour with XFree86. It works well for my needs, which are just very light wordprocessing and web surfing. If I want a 1280x1024, I'll go home and use my desktop.

    Seriously, you might check a used laptop seller. The one I visited was willing to unload (perhaps never reload after a wipe?) Windows on some models for a discount.

    --
    It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
  364. It's Free Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OS X != Free Software

    1. Re:It's Free Software by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      OS X != Free Software

      Not the whole thing, but significant chunks of it are. Personaly I don't have a problem with using proprietary software if it does a better job than the Free alternatives, or if no Free alternatives exist, as long as it's not in some way Evil (contributes to Microsoft's monopoly, or writes to your boot track, or whatever).

      Would you consider buying an nVidia GeForce card? Their drivers are proprietary - however, they do actively support Linux and Free Software. So does Apple.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  365. It is a duty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paying the tax to Microsoft to have a computer is a duty.

  366. Why not get a dell custom? got cash? by way2trivial · · Score: 0

    http://www.dell.com/us/en/esg/topics/linux_000_pro ducts.htm Linux solutions on DellTM OptiPlexTM desktops and LatitudeTM notebooks may be ordered via Dell's Custom Factory Install service at http://www.dell.com/us/en/esg/services/service_cfi ClientCFIServices.htm

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  367. site that sells laptops with no O/S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should check out http://www.discountlaptops.com , no O/S installed! Not endorsing them, just giving a good example here.

  368. (apt-)get an iBook and run Debian on it by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

    I've got a friend who just did just this, the support for the hardware is excellent. To na-sayers who will complain about Apple's proprietary hardware, it's actually an advantage here; without all sorts of wacky configurations to choose from, everything on the iBook is supported from network/sound/trackpad/function key maps/sleep/power savers/etc. Add to that the benh kernel and you'll really be moving. Think about all the kern modules that are not needed and thus not loaded via that specialized kernel built just for that hardware configuration, talk about a clean implementation.

    This way your running on less power hungry hardware, and running an OS that's much less power hungry to boot, and a kernel that only does what it needs for that top. You avoid the MS tax, you can get a 700Mhz for 999$, you get built in wifi (airport card an add 79$), you get the best battery life, plus Debian/GNU Linux which supports the hardware beautifully. Any na-sayers about Linux fonts need to run Gnome2.2 and then get back to me. Don't like Gnome? Install it for the fonts, and then run Fluxbox or Openbox. If you give it a try I doubt you'll be disappointed.

    CB

  369. What about Gentoo Linux? by Prot · · Score: 1

    If you've got the time and nerve to install Gentoo Linux on your iBook, you'll be rewarded with a nice, fast and slim system, that IMHO runs much smoother than OS X. Plus you'll get the most recent versions of your favourite apps...

  370. Linux on Sony vaio U3 by red_gnom · · Score: 1


    "I was just going to ask if anybody had tried to put Linux on one of these things."

    Try this:
    Linux on Sony U3

  371. Apple innovation? Have you seen their mice? by imbezol · · Score: 1

    I cannot understand why laptop makers continue to use these silly pads

    Heh, a better question is why apple mice still have but one button. Are you ready for that leap? Can you coordinate two fingers, possibly simultaneously? You might be ready for linux if you can click them at the same time for some 3-button emulation.

    1. Re:Apple innovation? Have you seen their mice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complain all you want but the one button mouse promotes good UI in apple apps. All the functions are there to see.
      Also i don't need a second or third button or even 5 or 6 buttons on my mouse ..i need a full keyboard of function keys.

    2. Re:Apple innovation? Have you seen their mice? by Golias · · Score: 1

      2001 called. They want their one-button-mouse troll back.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:Apple innovation? Have you seen their mice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if two buttons are better than one -- and three better than four... why not have a mouse with 105 buttons? Or would you call that a keyboard?

  372. More Fujitsu Lifebook by Flicker · · Score: 1

    Here's another vote for the Fujitsu P-2000 series. I had similar requirements and ended up with this device. The clincher for me was the battery life - put a couple of high capacity batteries in this puppy and you can go all day on a charge (10+ hours in my experience). Its also fairly cheap, really small, and quite linux compatible (everything but the winmodem). RH8 installs directly from the built in CD in 30 minutes with no hassles.

    BTW - if you want to discourage hardware vendors from hitting you with the windows tax; one strategy is to go through the motions of getting the refund. Get a headset and park on their 800 line until you work through their whole service department. Maybe you'll get the refund, maybe you won't. The vendor won't hang up on you because the EULA clearly entitles you to return the product for refund. If they do kick you off just call back and start over with anothe operator. Don't mention the first call. Do it while web surfing some weekday. Sure it takes some time, but its entertaining and it makes the statement that you want sent. Its not as fun as picketing, but its more effective because it costs them money to deal with you - especially if you get escalated to a service center manager. If everyone who wanted the refund did this then vendors would pretty quickly put the machinery in place to enable refunds because it would be cheaper for them than the alternative of spending service center personnel resources.

    Read the EULA before you try this so you know what you are talking about. I xerox it and highlight the parts I want to quote back to them. And don't give up easily - they'll try to get you off the phone. Remember the point of the exercise is to make it expensive and painful to the most senior people that you can get on the line. Be calm and reasonable and relentless. And have fun!

    --
    this is not a sig
  373. los alamos computers by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

    will customize it, a bit.

    don't know about form factor.

    they built 'the ultimate linux pc' a year or so ago. Your choice of distro. good stuff.

    also: qli.

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  374. schlocky overpriced "Linux" reseller ?? by EmperorLinux · · Score: 1

    I must take offense sir! You obviously have not read our site, nor do you know anything about
    our company. If you'd take a moment to actually research your subject before commenting...

    You'd find that we are fully focused on providing the Linux OS on portable systems for individuals and companies that require full hardware support out of the box. We are very well respected by the research Universities and government research labs that buy our systems.
    Our customers are a very satisfied bunch (judging by the fact that they always come back for more) because we truly deliver what we advertise.

    Furthermore, we are _not_ a Linux reseller, but a producer of fully tested, supported, and ready to go portable Linux system solutions. Real Linux experts take the orders on the phone, and can discuss with you at length the pros and cons of partitioning choices, filesystem choices, which distro is best for you, and which machine will have the functionality under Linux to do what your job requires. Real Linux experts sit down in front of each completed custom install and ensure that all hardware in the system works in Linux. If you need advice on Linux apps for a certain function, We've got talented people to help you.

    We supply a machine specific manual with each system that explains the use and configuration of all the hardware in your system. When you place a tech support call you will always be _directly_connected_ to a real Linux expert, perhaps even the company president (he's in the support queue too)

    Additionally, _all_ our employees run Linux, even the admin. assistants. We do our financials in GnuCash, all our Ad art is done using the Gimp, (even though that is a headache for certain magazines, we insist.) We use LaTeX for all quotes, invoices, faxes, bills, shipping labels. All our web-hosting and e-mail is on Linux. We have _no_ proprietary OSes or software anywhere in this organization, and never have had.

    I think by "schlocky" you would mean some fly-by night outfit from NYC that charges 20% below list because they aren't a licensed reseller, and the product is opened and a restock or worse, and if you want to send it back, they charge you a 20% restock fee. And they wont have any warranty support, b/c its "gray market" goods. _NONE_ of that applies to MY company.

    So, we are certainly not "schlocky". We are very well respected in the Linux community, and well connected to several of the core kernel team. We go to every Linux World Expo, and have been in the Linux Journal for 3.5 years, as well as SysAdmin, and Open, when they were still around.

    care to duel?

    --
    Lincoln D. Durey, Ph.D.
    Electrical Engineer
    EmperorLinux
    1. Re:schlocky overpriced "Linux" reseller ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't it piss you off - working that hard for a PhD only to be dependant on someone else's throwaway code for a shitty little living?

    2. Re:schlocky overpriced "Linux" reseller ?? by vonWoland · · Score: 1

      O.K., O.K., you convinced me. Now, howzabout a job?

  375. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by BigDish · · Score: 1

    OK, first off, Apple's hardware today tends to be standard, with a special, Apple, twist. Examples: 1. ADC-Apple took DVI and made it propritary 2. CD-ROM Drives-Yes, regular IDE drives will work in a Mac, but many are not bootable. My PC's will boot off every CDROM drive I've thrown at them 3. OpenFirmware-Yes, it's OpenFirmware, but doesn't it have propritary extensions for bootstrapping the OS? I can't install OS X on like an IBM PowerPC Machine. The Mac is NOT totally open-if it was I could do this. 4. 802.11b-Apple took a Standard (PCMCIA) and changed the connector a little so a standard PCMCIA card would not work in it. The Airport card is just a apple-branded Lucent Orinocco, but apple "customized" it so you had to pay extra for the apple-branded card. Yes, apple used to be FAR more proipritary than they are. However, I don't think that apple is trying to be a better company by becomming less propritary. Rather, I think it is pure economics-using PC parts is cheaper than building your own. Apple has learned that they can have an even bigger profit margin by using standard parts.

  376. Idea.... by eekaterrorist · · Score: 1

    If you know someone who is building their own computer from components and are looking for a Windows licence for it, you can offer to sell/give your Windows licence to them.

  377. Portege 3110CT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    300Mhz PII, 128MB RAM, 2lbs, very, very small, 800x600 - USB, PCMCIA, IF.port + expansion device that has VGA, Printer, Serial, Ethernet, +1 USB, headphone, microphone.

    I got mine off Ebay for about $250. That was about 2 years ago. I've been using it ever since. The battery that comes with it doesn't really last that long, but you can get a new one.

    And it runs Linux great, no problems what-so-ever, and there are software and built-in kernel support for Toshiba laptops.

  378. Re: Apple *did* have the first touchpad by mkldev · · Score: 1

    You forgot the most important reason of all....

    They're thin.

    --
    120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
  379. Apple hardware: Getting what you're paying for? by Ogerman · · Score: 1

    Yes, Apple's notebooks have improved drastically over the past year or so, but are you really getting that great of deal? What most people don't seem to remember is that the G3/G4's are solidly outperformed by P3/P4/Athlon's. While it is true that (in some tasks) the PowerPC chips can provide more performance per clock speed, this lead is 20% at the most. And in some cases, such as the incredibly weak FPU of the G3, performance is MUCH worse per clock speed than with competing x86 chips. A P3-800 will outperform a G3-800 in almost every task. A P3-1Ghz. will about match a G4-800, each with its areas of slight advantage. An Athlon 2Ghz. will fully outperform any G4 chip on the market. They may not be as elegant, but the reality is that x86 chips still have a large performance AND price advantage.

    OK, so what about battery life? Apple folks claim to run 4-5 hours on a full charge, while (most) PC laptops tend to hover in the 2-3 hour range. BUT, the PC laptops are running at higher clock speeds that give them greater performance. I propose this challenge: Take a well-designed PC laptop that gets 3 hours battery life with an Athlon or P4 running in the 1.8-2.2Ghz. range. Now, clock that system down to the range in which it matches the performance of a G4 in one of Apple's notebooks. I'd almost guarantee you can get the same, if not better, battery life than the Apple product.

    What about quality of construction / features? Apple hardware is very well built and nicely feature-rich. It is unfortunate that some PC laptop manufacturers/OEM's have given PC laptops such a bad name in this area. But, here's the trick: don't buy from the "big name" PC laptop vendors. These companies have tended to produce increasingly shoddy / cut-rate laptop products. The plastic is cheap, the movable parts are flimsy, and the custom engineering involves a lot of cut corners to shave costs. You wouldn't in your right mind actually buy a desktop machine from these guys, right?.. so why a laptop? Look for a well built OEM unbranded PC laptop and then find a vendor that sells it the cheapest. As a side note, one thing I specifically dislike about Apple's laptops is the lower resolution LCD's they use. 1024x768 is still the norm in the 14-15" Powerbook line, while many PC laptops now offer 1400x1050.

    This is just my experience and YMMV. I'm not in any way saying that Apple hardware is bad. But in my opinion, it is still overpriced for what you get. Unless you actually want/need MacOSX, get a quality PC and run Linux/FreeBSD. Sure, you can run a lot of your favorite Open Source software in MacOSX, but it's more hastle to get it working than using Linux distros' package managers or BSD ports.

  380. How about a PDA? by suitti · · Score: 1
    My first two laptops died after about 3 years. That's about $500/year for having a laptop. They just don't last long enough for proper amortization.

    My Palm was only about $130. Yes, that means 160x160 grey. If it dies, I'm only $130 from a replacement. My screen broke, and it was only $60 to replace it.

    Palm isn't Linux. But, it is a lightweight OS, and full backups of an 8 MB Palm neither take a long time, nor consume much backup media.

    Unfortunately, I haven't had much luck with used laptops. Their life is short, and buying a used one robs you of some of that life.

    Sharp has a Linux PDA, and IBM has released a reference platform for a PPC based PDA - for Linux. If you can't get what you want now, you should be able to get it soon.

    My next recommendation is to go with a PDA with standard batteries. My Handspring uses 2 AAA batteries. I get 4 rechargables from Miejer's for $11, and a great charger for $26. If I want more spares, their cheap. The new chargers allow me to charge and forget - putting them at my convenience. If my Palm dies, I get to reuse the batteries.

    --
    -- Stephen.
  381. BOOOOOORRRIIIINNNNNNGGGGGG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even I must say that this topic is BOOOORRRRRIIIIINNNNNGGGGGG

  382. "Pointer Clit"? by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

    I always preferred to think of it as a nipple, and I found it to be MUCH easier to use than those damn trackpads. I had to get a cheap hp laptop with a trackpad for economic reasons, but I really miss that thinkpad nipple. Or real nipples. I miss those too. Dammit.

  383. IBM and Ebay... by aquarian · · Score: 1

    A good place to look is the IBM store on Ebay. They sell overstocks, refurbs, or whatever with a full factory warranty and everything. Most of the models are a year or two old, but the latest ones turn up there too. The discount is substantial -- not much more than what you'd pay for a private party sale on a used machine. Of course, you don't need the Windows software that comes with the machine, but with the great discount you're getting it doesn't matter. You might even be able to sell it.

    I'm not sure exactly how IBM's warranties are attatched to the hardware and software -- whether not using the supplied software affects the hardware warranty. Frankly, I just choose to live dangerously, and I don't care. The cheaper machine is enough for me.

    Perhaps the best reason to buy a Thinkpad is that they're so well regarded they're practically a cult machine, almost to the degree of Apple products. So there are plenty of websites devoted to installing Linux on Thinkpads. There's Thinkpad specific software so all the little buttons work, etc. It's well-trodden territory. But the hot tip is to buy a T, A, or X Series, and not an R. The R uses some cheaper hardware for things like the modem, and AFAIK, drivers aren't available yet.

  384. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by JimRay · · Score: 1

    A few counterpoints...

    1. ADC-Apple took DVI and made it propritary
    The ADC bundles DVI, USB and power into a single connection to avoid a tangle of wires. It's part of the simplified aesthetic that makes Apple hardware so elegant. I can still connect my VGA monitor to my brand new dual 1.4 GHZ PowerMac no problem. And I could connect a cinema display to any DVI port with an adaptor.

    2. CD-ROM Drives-Yes, regular IDE drives will work in a Mac, but many are not bootable. My PC's will boot off every CDROM drive I've thrown at them
    I can't remember how long it's been since I couldn't buy a Mac with a CD-Rom drive. Do you really need to boot off of that extra drive you added?

    3. OpenFirmware-Yes, it's OpenFirmware, but doesn't it have propritary extensions for bootstrapping the OS? I can't install OS X on like an IBM PowerPC Machine. The Mac is NOT totally open-if it was I could do this.
    Dammit, I can't install Windows on an IBM PowerPC Machine, either. And I can't install Mac OS 9 on my Playstation.
    Apple builds their software and hardware to integrate and be as open as possible. It's an easier to use machine because it doesn't try to be everything to every platform. It works really, really well on the supported platform. Don't like it? Perhaps you'd rather spend time configuring software drivers and managing DLL's.

    4. 802.11b-Apple took a Standard (PCMCIA) and changed the connector a little so a standard PCMCIA card would not work in it. The Airport card is just a apple-branded Lucent Orinocco, but apple "customized" it so you had to pay extra for the apple-branded card.
    Well, that's certainly one possibility. Of course, I can use an Orinoco, Belkin or any other 802.11b PCMCIA in my powerbook and it works just fine. In fact, my Lombard Powerbook has an Orinoco card in the PCMCIA slot and it connects to my Airport base station just fine.
    Perhaps Apple didn't "customize" the Orinoco card to gouge their customers, rather they wanted to allow their customers to still have access to their PCMCIA slot while using a WiFi connection via their Airport card.

    However, I don't think that apple is trying to be a better company by becomming less propritary. Rather, I think it is pure economics-using PC parts is cheaper than building your own.
    Certainly, the economics argument holds water. But how does that account for the standards that Apple has invented, like WiFi and Firewire? They certainly could have made them proprietary. Would you mind explaining how the contributions made to KHTML and Zeroconf (via WebCore and Rendezvous, respectively) fit into Apple's evil, proprietary, Bond-villain scheme?

    --
    My other computer is your Windows box
  385. YELLOW DOG LINUX IS LINUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and it will run on ibooks just fine.

  386. Used Sony SRX99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I doubt you'll find anything without Windows other than the 12" Powerbook, but if you can find the Sony SRX99 used, it meets your other requirements. It uses a whopping 40 Watt-hour battery, which is quite large for a laptop with a P3/850 with a 10.4" XGA screen (lasts 4+ hours in real-world use). Has 802.11b, ethernet, firewire, and weighs 2.7 pounds. Note that the CDRW/DVD is external, but it's bus-powered so no external AC adapter is required. I got a new spare battery on Ebay for $139. I upgraded to a 40 GB 5400 RPM IBM Travelstar hdd with 8 MB cache for $138 (is quieter, much faster, and doesn't hurt battery life noticeably).

    The downsides: It maxes at 384MB RAM. And it's a Sony (some complain their service sucks).

    However, it's a hell of a lot faster than my wife's Fujitsu P-2040, which has a Crusoe CPU. As much as I want to like Transmeta, their current CPUs perform horribly... their next generation sounds promising.

  387. Re: Apple *did* have the first touchpad by Golias · · Score: 1
    Which is why the "tap" feature is almost always turned off now days. (That, and the fact that tapping can actually damage the track-pad over time, if you are one of those people who tapped really hard.)

    My iBook does nto support using the trackpad as a mouse-button.

    I hate the IBM nipple with a passion. It's like trying to mouse around with a teeny-tiny one-finger joystick... actually, it's not "like" that, it is that.

    I thought the old mini-trackballs were okay, but you gotta clean them even more often than regular non-optical mice.

    Whenever possible, I prefer to plug a mouse into my notebook, because no mobile solution is quite as good. However, when I'm on a plane or at a tiny coffee-shop table or something, the trackpad is far and away the best mouse replacement, once you get used to it.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  388. Desknote by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    Uses desktop processor and RAM in a laptop
    form factor, you can build ur own even .

    My friend bought one, popped in 512meg
    of RAM, a high speed laptop 40 gig drive,
    and 2.53ghz desktop processor , and a
    DVD/CD-rw drive .

    It comes standard with USB 2.0 and Firewire .

    Only draw back, external battery pack .

    http://www.desknote.net/

    Suprisingly, you can get it without M$ preload.

    Good luck !!

    Ex-MislTech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    1. Re:Desknote by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Ohhh,

      Don't get the one with the Sis Video
      Chipset, they dropped the ball on OpenGL,
      it still does not work ....

      Nvidia still best Linux support so it seems .

      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  389. used by ngu · · Score: 1

    buy a used machine from ebay. thats what i did, twice.

  390. Hard-coded pixel offsets by yerricde · · Score: 1

    As you increase your resolution, set your icon and font scale to be larger. This is an OS/window manager setting, so it applies to all apps immediately.

    Unless you must use a proprietary but mission-critical app that's coded poorly with hard-coded pixel offsets so as not to respond correctly to changes in the system resolution.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  391. Seriously, take another look at the Apple 12" PB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Apple 12" PowerBook outperforms the iBook and is a little smaller. It meets your requirements and it outperforms the iBook. The only downside is heat and cost. The iBook is a G3 processor and the PowerBook 12" is a G4 processor. The G3 is slower but better on heat and power usage. The new Aluminum 12" PowerBook is more sturdy than the iBooks.

    I've run Linux since it was truly useable i.e. 0.99.x kernel. I still run several Linux boxes along with some Sun hardware. I used to spend a whole lot of time getting Linux to run on laptops.

    Then I bought a 15" Powerbook. Best damn laptop I have ever used or owned. It works very very well, it's rugged and everything just works as it should. The paint can flake and I put a ding in the lid when I dropped something on it. The new Aluminum shell on the new line is an improvement. I run OSX on it. I didn' t bother running Linux on it even though I could. Once I became accustomed to OSX I now use OSX as my only workstation software. I run OSX on the laptop and I bought a PowerMac desktop as my main workstation.

    Linux on the desktop doesn't cut it. I was using Linux successfully as an end user system. I ran all the Window Managers and both KDE and Gnome. I've tweaked and fiddled constantly. I've run Vim and Emacs to see both sides of the fence.

    I am not a GNU nut. I believe in buying some software if it does what I want. I don't really care if Apple has some closed source. I don't care if I have to pay for it. As long as they don't rape me as bad as Microsoft. I bought Office X because I have no choice but to read and process MS Documents and I don't like to risk compatibility.

    The Apple hardware is high quality stuff. Processor speeds could be much better but to tell the truth, it really doesn't matter as much as many claim. The Mhz/Ghz myth is really just a myth. New Apple hardware is fast enough, in my opinion. Sure the laptop is slower than the PowerMac desktop but the desktop is dual processor and has a faster hard disk and video card.

    Yeah, it's expensive but I was so impressed with the quality and power Apple offers; that it was a no brainer to drop the money on the desktop even 3 months after having just finished paying for the PowerBook!

    Even considering the purchase of an iMac 17" for the family to use. Getting tired of fixing that Sony Vaio running XP. Oh God, I'm running XP! Oh dear oh my! Can't run those games without XP! Linux would never fly for the family members. The iMac will most likely fit the bill as Civ III is out and my brothers addicted to it. Sure they don't have all the games but they have enough. Most of the family simply uses email and the web.

    Honestly, I have not found a single Open Source package that I could not get to work on the Mac's. Apple makes the best laptops on the market bar none. Worth every damn penny. I love the developer tools and the full command line abilities. I love the new X11 from Apple, it's full Aqua and OpenGL support works flawlessly and allows it to run faster than just pure Xfree86 (it really is XFree86 with a few Apple tweaks).

    I don't advocate replacing Linux/FreeBSD/OpenBSD/Solaris servers with Apple XServes. I don't believe they are nearly as flexible nor as scalable (yet). But if you have a small office and you are pro-Apple, you should definitely check them out.

    Any serious Unix developer should take a long hard look at the Apple hardware to consider it as a Unix laptop. C/C++/Obj-C/Perl/Python/PHP/Java/Tomcat/JBOSS/WebO bjects/etc.

  392. Dynamism.com by pid0 · · Score: 1

    Dynamism.com

    Sharp Moeibus M1.
    *gurgle*

    --
    --- "Just because you can....aw shit do it."
  393. Get a T30 by bugeye1959 · · Score: 1

    Just went through this. Get an IBM T30 2366M3U (to be configured model) for $1200. 2Ghz, 1400x1050 14in display. Titainium shell. Here is the IBM link: http://www-132.ibm.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/P roductDisplay?productId=8559837&storeId=1&langId=- 1&catalogId=-840 Buy the memory, hd, CDRW/DVD seperately. I bought 512mb ram from Crucial for $150 (free 2nd day shipping). I am using my old laptop harddrive, but I would recommend a Travelstar 5400 rpm model. I also bought the CD/RW/DVD (new) off of ebay for $149. Plain CDRW's can be had for about $100 or less on ebay. Total cost: 1200 + 149 + 150 = $1499 You don't get the built in Wireless networking, consider a linux supported pcmcia card for this purpose, It'll be cheaper. Join the linux-thinkpad email list. Lots of support availible, both from users and IBM insiders. I plan on running a lightweight optimized distro, Yoper or Gentoo.

  394. PC Bashing vs. PPC Bashing by RnKTessai · · Score: 1

    The guy already stated in the article that he's not sure that he will buy an iBook. It's a little heavier than he'd like it to be. So, all the Apple trolls can sit down and be quiet. He already knows the merits of OS X (or at least that's the feeling I get from his post), as well as it's pitfalls.

    What he wants is Linux. Not Windows, and not OS X. I mean, for crying out loud... Stop saying "dude you want an Apple," when you don't know what the hell he wants. If you're happy with your PPC machine, that's all fine and dandy. If you're happy with your PC machine, that's fine too. Hell, I own an IBM T21 with Slackware on it. Had it for 2 years now (job paid the M$ tax for me). Nothing special.

    In short: Stop fueling the flame wars and give this guy some advise he can use.

    --
    [RnK]Tessai
    For better or worse, it's your life or your purse...
  395. Re: Apple *did* have the first touchpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure Apple has carefully prepared usage studies to prove you wrong.

  396. Enforceable? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    you may not use the SOFTWARE.

    How can Microsoft enforce this? Is it even a binding contract? In a binding contract, both sides have to give something up. What rights does Microsoft give the user that the user doesn't already have by federal statute (17 USC 117)?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Enforceable? by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      How can Microsoft enforce this? Is it even a binding contract? In a binding contract, both sides have to give something up.

      OEM versions are much cheaper than retail versions. In return for giving up rights, including the right to transfer the software to another computer, the user gets a substantial discount on the software. In the statue that you referenced, it says: "Any exact copies prepared in accordance with the provisions of this section may be leased, sold, or otherwise transferred, along with the copy from which such copies were prepared, only as part of the lease, sale, or other transfer of all rights in the program. Adaptations so prepared may be transferred only with the authorization of the copyright owner." The license pretty clearly states that that authorization is not granted. It's really not that big a deal since the chances of Microsoft finding out (or caring) are slim, but then again if you're going to be illegal anyway, why not just run a pirated version and save yourself the $50.

  397. OFFTOPIC: How (not) to get effective tech support by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. I'm gonna venture a guess here. If I compare the parent poster's writing style to yours, I think it should be fairly obvious why he got helped and you didn't.

    Getting effective technical support requires some attention on the user's part. Calling up and bitching about how it doesn't work (which is what I suspect you did) and calling up and asking where to find the appropriate settings (which I suspect the parent poster did) are two very different things.

    Besides, I've never had any trouble connecting to the wireless networks. An unencrypted internet-only wireless network handing out addresses via DHCP worked immediately. The name of the network scolled across the menubar as I went within range. Another network which was encrypted (WEP) was a bit trickier as I had to figure out which key to type in, but it still only took a minute or two.

    The settings are right there, and are quite straightforward. If you simply didn't know they were there, then Apple tech support is great. If you call to bitch about how they suck because it worked just fine on your Linux and Windows systems then they probably don't give a fuck about you.

    By the way, whatever happened? Was it actually a hardware problem? Did you eventually get the settings straight and you now just use this story as good FUD? Or are you really clueless and just trolling?

  398. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I can't remember how long it's been since I couldn't buy a Mac with a CD-Rom drive.

    You miss the point. Grandparent was complaining about how hard it is to get Mac OS to boot from some hard drives.

    Do you really need to boot off of that extra drive you added?

    Yes. What if the factory drives break? I have had TWO hard drives break (run 30 minutes and then die) in a Macintosh Performa 6230CD machine: one factory and the other the warranty replacement.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  399. The P does have Firewire by avi4now · · Score: 1

    I have a Fujitsu P-2110, purchased new directly from Fujitsu 6 months ago, and actually it does have a Firewire port. The tech specs for the newer model, the P-2120, confirm this.

    My wife and I are very happy with our P, the lightness combined with the Wi-fi add so much freedom to our computing, and it's got an amazing LCD, a great optical drive. Our model isn't especially fast, but the P-2120 is supposedly quite a bit faster, with a higher clock speed Crusoe and a Radeon versus our Rage video chipset.

    If you do want to look into the P series, there is a linux forum at leog.net that should be helpful. They also have a for sale forum where you might be able to find a P-2120 cheap. I've also seen them on Ebay.

    However, I do think that if you buy a used Windows system, you're still paying the "Windows Tax", albeit a bit further removed. Honestly, I think if you buy a Mac you're also paying a "software tax", but at least it's not to Microsoft.

  400. Microtel said they would sell Linux laptops by icanoop · · Score: 1

    I asked Microtel back in November if they would be selling Linux laptops. Here was the response I got...

    > hi ryan,
    >
    > we are about ready to offer linux notebooks.
    >
    > thanks,

    I still don't see any Linux laptops on their website though.

  401. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

    Uh..do you have a history of eating paintchips or have some sort of clinical problem preventing you from making logical conclusions?

    1. ADC is DVI with USB and power pins added. The AGP pinout spec has power pins facilitated, Apple's just the first motherboard manufacturer to make any use of this. ADC is fully compatible with DVI, it is just more convenient because it reduces wire clutter behind your computer.

    2. Apple didn't specifically disable particular CD-ROMs from booting, It is the CD-ROM manufacturer screwing with the drives ATAPI firmware that prevents some drives from working.

    3. There's no proprietary extensions for booting MacOS don't posit assumptions as facts. It has Forth modules that make booting pre-X versions of MacOS possible. There were just shortcuts that launched the OS8/9 bootloader. The OF command you're thinking of is mac-boot. Considering you can do what you will with OF modules you can make a linux-boot module if you so choose.

    4. That is just absurd, the AirPort card is INTERNAL. Few if any PCMCIA card are designed to fit into an internal slot. The only thing Apple did to the Orinoco was to remove the built-in antenna to be able to hoot the card up to the system's antenna. How this is somehow evil and a sabotaging of the PCMCIA slot I don't see.

    If you wanted to boot OSX on an IBM PPC machine you'd need to write your own drivers for the memory controller and other little odds and ends but the system itself would likely run just fine. There's nothing special OF does besides run the bootloader which is far from proprietary because I can launch Linux at boot time as well as MacOS.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  402. Not so small or light by avi4now · · Score: 1

    Took a look at the site, looks like the lightest system they have is a hefty 6.16 lbs! I love the ones they describe as "7.5 lbs light." They even have a 15" system that's 12 pounds! Jeez! This is not the future of computing, people! The future is a 1 pound, 0.5" thin convertible tablet with a touchscreen, a stylus, and wireless!

  403. Re:OFFTOPIC: How (not) to get effective tech suppo by g4dget · · Score: 1
    Getting effective technical support requires some attention on the user's part. Calling up and bitching about how it doesn't work (which is what I suspect you did) and calling up and asking where to find the appropriate settings (which I suspect the parent poster did) are two very different things.

    I didn't have a problem with "settings".

    I called up and said: "I'm having a problem with my Macintosh Powerbook. It used to connect to my access point, but it stopped working a few days ago. All my other machines still work, so I know the AP is fine. It doesn't even see the network, and reinstalling the OS didn't help either. I think it may be a hardware problem. Could I send it in under my service contract so that you can take a look at it?".

    The tech report representative responded: "Before you send it in, there are some things we need to check. Could you please open the AirPort setup utility; we need to check your access point.".

    I said: "I am using a [brand X] access point; the AirPort utility won't work with that, will it?"

    The tech support person responded: "I'm sorry, but we do not provide support for connecting to non-Apple access point."

    I said: "But this Macintosh used to be able to connect, and all the other laptops still work. It stands to reason that it's a hardware problem with the Macintosh rather than anything else."

    The tech report representative said: "Sorry. But you could take it in to an Apple dealer yourself and if it also doesn't work with an AirPort access point, then we will try to repair it under our service contract."

    By the way, whatever happened? Was it actually a hardware problem? Did you eventually get the settings straight and you now just use this story as good FUD? Or are you really clueless and just trolling?

    The Macintosh went in for some other repairs that coincidentally involved replacing the entire top part of the machine (which, I gather, contains the antenna) and it works now fairly well (the range is still pretty poor, however).

    The settings are right there, and are quite straightforward.

    Yes, it is, and I didn't want support for configuring the Mac. As I said, it was working fine with the AP for months until, one day, for no good reason, it stopped working.

    I think it should be fairly obvious why he got helped and you didn't.

    Perhaps it's related to the fact that he didn't have a hardware problem and I probably did.

    Now, if you have a suggestion for how I could have gotten "more effective" technical support, please feel free to tell me, because I don't see it.

  404. laptop without windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC CLUB will see you a laptop with Redhat installed, or no OS installed at at all.
    www.pcclub.com

  405. keep your legacy laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're not so concerned about having this as your primary system (and if you're interested in the Libretto, then you're obviously not), then locate a second-hand machine that someone's about to get rid of. I still tote around a p166 laptop, and even though it's slow, it's adequate for writing, scripting, and even some minimal drawing and programming. Connect with your work machine when you need to xfer stuff, and try not to find yourself on travel just when you need to use gimp or the like.

    If the manufacturers won't give you what you want, why buy something you don't want or that might not be Linux-compatible?

  406. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by NNKK · · Score: 1

    Apparently they do, I was unaware of that (and it was semi-difficult to track down on google, at that). That does present an obstacle.

    As far as I know, there's no such thing as a "do it yourself" Apple kit. Such a thing would be fairly silly. The customer base would be restricted to those that could buy and assemble components separately anyway.

    In any case, the memory controller is an inconvenience, not a complete barrier. One important question is whether the differences are visible to applications. If you can change the controller while maintaning binary compatability (I'd be surprised if you couldn't), only Darwin would need to be modified (and I'd expect it already HAS been).

    Also, if there were actual demand, the controller could be reverse-engineered and a compatible one developed (and this is assuming that the reverse engineering is necissary; has Apple documented the thing anywhere?).

    In short: Yeah, oops, didn't know that. Not a 100% barrier, though, just makes it more difficult than I thought it was. ;)

  407. Terms added after sale don't bind by yerricde · · Score: 1

    THIS COMMENT IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE.

    In return for giving up rights, including the right to transfer the software to another computer, the user gets a substantial discount on the software.

    The user sees the terms only after consideration has already been exchanged. As I understand it, conditions added after the sale of a copy, especially unilateral conditions in a contract of adhesion, do not bind the parties.

    17 USC 117: "Any exact copies prepared in accordance with the provisions of this section may be leased, sold, or otherwise transferred, along with the copy from which such copies were prepared, only as part of the lease, sale, or other transfer of all rights in the program"

    This states merely that I can sell my backups only if I sell all copies that I own.

    "Adaptations so prepared may be transferred only with the authorization of the copyright owner." The license pretty clearly states that that authorization is not granted.

    The genuine hologrammed copies are not an "adaptation" under copyright law, and that's the only thing I'd be selling.

    The only way Microsoft could have a remote chance to make a EULA binding would be to encrypt the install files and to claim that installing the software without agreeing to the click-through EULA circumvents the access on the install files and violates section 1201(a) of the DMCA.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Terms added after sale don't bind by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      The only way Microsoft could have a remote chance to make a EULA binding would be...

      Click-through EULA's have been found to be entirely enforcable - see Specht v. Netscape/AOL. In this case, the license was found to be unenforcable, but only because the user didn't have to click on "I agree" or something similar before installing the software. The decision says "The primary purpose of downloading is to obtain a product, not to assent to an agreement. In contrast, clicking on an icon stating "I assent" has no meaning or purpose other than to indicate such assent. Netscape's failure to require users of SmartDownload to indicate assent to its license as a precondition to downloading and using its software is fatal to its argument that a contract has been formed." Also see Register.COM v. Verio, Inc. where a "by submitting a query, you agree to the terms of this license" clause was found enforcable. In the case of the Windows XP license, you have to click the "I Agree" button before installing, making whatever terms are in the EULA enforceable according to either of these decisions.

  408. laptops for GNU/Linux users by kargasan · · Score: 2, Informative
    Los Alamos Computers

    http://www.laclinux.com/cgi-bin/laptop.py

    sells laptops preinstalled with a variety of GNU/LInux distributions, and MS Windows is optional. They come in a variety of sizes.

    By the way with regard to the "Microsoft Tax", as far as I know, there really is no such thing. Companies that force customers to have an MS OS installed in their new system are usually following the requirements of an agreement they have with Microsoft. By the agreement, they get MS OSs very cheap, hence they do not have to add $100+ to each system to recover the cost of the MS OS. There are other requirements too -- e.g. It is not allowed to display the price of the MS OS as a part of the full system price. The MS OS must be presented as an "integral part of the computer system, without which, the computer is unusable". Ya right.

  409. Re:Apple hardware: Getting what you're paying for? by ckd · · Score: 1
    As a side note, one thing I specifically dislike about Apple's laptops is the lower resolution LCD's they use. 1024x768 is still the norm in the 14-15" Powerbook line, while many PC laptops now offer 1400x1050.

    The iBook 12" and 14" models and the AlBook 12", yes; the 15" TiBooks have a very nice 1280x854 display, though, great for watching widescreen DVDs on.

    Sure, you can run a lot of your favorite Open Source software in MacOSX, but it's more hastle to get it working than using Linux distros' package managers or BSD ports.

    Fink is the answer; it's a package manager/port system for Mac OS X.

  410. hp notebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't buy a recent HP notebook. The sound does not work in redhat 8.0... Also I would look for a notebook that has dedicated video memory. Another thing to remember is that linux does not like winmodems and all laptops use winmodems. With the price of laptops as cheap as they are I would go with a new one even if it comes with windows it's still cheap.

  411. Fujitsu Siemens C-Series by ectoraige · · Score: 1

    I recently bought myself a Siemens C1020 Lifebook, and noticed a funny thing in the manual. It gave instructions on how to turn off the notebook for both windows and linux operating systems, and also provided the following link: http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/Linux
    I didn't pay too much attention to it, as I was more interested in running FreeBSD on my Fujitsu-Siemens C1020

    But since you asked, I've just had a look at the site.

    To quote: "Linux is the dominant operating system for Internet service providers (ISPs) and, for example, its use by public administrations is increasing. The co-ordinating and consulting office for information technology of the federal government of Germany recommended to use open source software in government bureaus. It was suggested that open software such as the operating systems Linux or FreeBSD could be used on servers as well as on desktop PCs."

    Having a poke around it now, I've just discovered http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/partner/linux/serve r.shtm
    which provides a list of machines, including laptops, which are certified Red Hat and SuSe hardware.

    I'm not sure if you can actually buy them without windows yet, but they are certainly moving in the right direction, so if you can't find a winfree supplier, maybe support them. And, heh, just noticed as checking the links, you can download a desktop background with Tux on a surfboard.

    --
    Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, ybt bss abj. Tb bhgfvqr. Syl n xvgr.
  412. linux laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try www.laclinux.com

  413. Re:Apple inventions? by Grailhead · · Score: 1
    The finger pads on laptops for mouse movements is an example of apple's inventions

    Incorrect. Apple was still shipping trackballs in its 100 series PowerBooks when Glidepoint produced the first, IIRC, trackpads for x86-based notebooks. I had an Everex 386-based notebook with one.

    --
    "Peanuts, Mr Bond?"
  414. Prostar, Sagat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These two companies will sell you a good notebook with no OS. check out there sites. They are just small packagers basically.

    -Jason

  415. official response from dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i talked to dell guys at the linux expo a month ago.
    i asked them the exact same thing. (actually i asked all the PC companies there. only dell had the answer).
    call them up. they have a department that deals with "special" purchases. i.e. no OS.
    you will even be able to purchase a laptop running RedHat (i think 7.3).
    at their expo, their tech guy had a small dell running redhat. it was tough not to grab it and run. small sleek and with a tux sticker....

  416. Irony; Offtopic by irony+nazi · · Score: 1

    I think that you fail to understand the point of my friend, the grammar nazi.

    --

    Bringing irony to the Slash-masses
  417. The only good Windows... by Tony · · Score: 1

    ...is a dead Windows.

    Windows software and with 90%+ of market penetration, I'd say that Windows is excellent (there's not many products and industries with marketshare like that).

    So you are saying that Budweiser is an excellent beer? That Kangaroo Jack is an excellent movie? That Arnold Schwartzenager is an excellent actor? That the Ford Escort is an excellent Car?

    Compared to what?

    Market share has little to do with the quality of a product; it has more to do with marketting, and with distribution channel control. MS-Windows is no more a good product than Budwieser is a good beer. Both are watered-down, tasteless versions of something that should be robust and rewarding.

    I liken the current state of the software market to the beer market of the early '80s. At the time, you could get several diffent versions of the same tasteless beer, with one beer leading the way, and innovating tasteless, watery brew.

    Today, *BSD, Linux, and a few dozen other operating systems are like the microbrews of the early '80s: a small group of discerning people knew and loved them, but the masses still drank pisswater. However, it was difficult to find good beer at any but the most exclusive of pubs. Today, the masses still drink bad beer, but at least it isn't impossible to get good beer at your local package store.

    Some AOS (alternate OS) users hope for world domination. I just hope for the day I can get a fucking laptop without paying Microsoft to build more shitty software.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  418. eurocom notebooks by spencerbrowes · · Score: 1

    i'd suggest visiting www.eurocom.ca . i dunno if they have what you are looking for in piticular, but they have a wide selection of notebooks without os's pre-loaded.

  419. careful about batteries though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like some good deals, but do have a plan in mind for those marked "battery not guaranteed to hold charge". Might be worth making sure you can still buy new batteries for the given model from Dell.

  420. YDL by pixelcort · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yellow Dog Linux is an awesome Linux distribution for the Mac and works quite well. I have my laptop set up with dual-boot into YDL and OS X. You get the best of both worlds. Boot into Linux all the time and then into OS X when you just want the dang thing to work. ;)

    Also, the people at TerraSoft (makers of YDL) are also Apple resellers, but get this: They are preinstalled with YDL! I would definitely check this out. If they are selling the 12in PowerBook, order it from them. Then you will get a brand new MiniPowerBook with Linux preinstalled. Snazzy!

    --
    http://pixelcort.com/
  421. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    It's a real shame that you can't buy Apple motherboards + OS X. Such a package would allow an existing PC owner (i.e. Me :) to upgrade at a (relatively) small cost. An ideal solution would have a co-processor slot on the motherboard into which the existing x86 chip could be placed, where it would be given access to a partitioned section of the machines resources to allow (near) full-speed PC emulation by Virtual PC.

    Yes, I know it's not going to happen.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  422. Buying a Small Linux Laptop by El_Averiguao · · Score: 1

    EmperorLinux.com has the laptop you are looking for. I purchased their Kiwi model, which is the Sony VAIO PictureBook two years ago. The machine I acquired has the Transmeta 700 Mhz processor, today you can get faster speeds, 12 GB of hardisk space, firewire, USB, PCMCIA, and it even has a top quality video/photo camera integrated. They deliver it with Slackware or RedHat in a dual boot configuration. If you don't want Windows just erase that particular partition. That's what I did.

  423. iBook by jjeffrey · · Score: 2

    Well I don't want to get in to the argument over performance - that one has been done to death.

    I want to talk about my experience with my iBook. In short I love it. Yes it is only an 800MHZ G3 but there is no perceptible lack of power, in fact I sometimes find myself marvelling at just how well it multitasks. RAM is the key with OS X, I bought a 512MB DIMM from Crucial at the same time as I bought the machine. Cheap and works a treat.

    The machine is a joy to use, I hate touchpads, but I have got used to this one.

    The keyboard is quite good, though on UNIX having to press alt-3 for # is annoying (I must find some software to remap that silly double s key to hash lol). The terminal software is fantastic once you have it set to green on black with transparency. Things like tomcat are easy to install. The machine is light and seems fairly robust. I use it all day at work in one user account for managing UNIX servers and writing proposals in Word, then take it home in the evening and use it for browsing the net and checking my mail. The display is wonderful. OmniGraffle is far superior to Visio and I the only MS tax I paid was for the heavily discounted version of Office I bought with the machine.

    Last night after a couple of drinks I saw a PC laptop in standby. It looked so ugly with that horrible flashing green LED and its big silver case... I work with rack mount servers, I'm not obsesses with looks, but give me the dimming-brightening standby light on my nice white iBook anyday.

    The build in Ethernet is great. The USB is great. All it needs is a serial port for console management - and you can get them cheaply enough.

  424. Don't want to pay the 'Windows Tax' by rhammill · · Score: 1

    Here's another perspective (I think...I haven't read all 1000 replies yet). You don't want to pay for a copy of Windows that you are not going to use. But the price of non-Windows computers are higher, if available at all (not including Macs). Computers are manufactured and sold at a razor-thin margin. Software, peripherals and the extra warranties are where most of these companies make their real money. Most (if not all) of these companies support Windows only, so that's where they plan on making their money. To change production for a small percentage of machines is expensive. In addition, it doesn't work with their business plan, because they can't easily sell their peripherals and support services. It is similar to cell phone sales. The phones are cheap or free when you get them with a particular service, because they make their money on the service, not the phones. But they have to ensure service over a given period of time to recoup the cost of the hardware. Companies have tried to do the same with PCs. They gave you a free PC in return for a contract for internet service. unfortunately, it takes a certain sized customer base to support this type of arrangement. Otherwise you don't overcome the expenses that the business itself generates. Microsoft is not directly subsidizing the PC market (from what I have heard, OEMs pay only a slightly reduced price for MS licenses). But because of the installed base, these companies have been able to create an enormous market for additional products and services where they can make their money. One thing that I have always found interesting is the apparent double-standard. One of the reasons that MS is being sued is because they are bundling functionality into the O/S, or with the system. But wouldn't the same argument be used against Apple if they had 90% of the market and controlled the hardware, O/S and software development and continued to include Media management, players, DVD/CD burning software, web browsers, etc. as they already do? Anyway, I'm getting off track...Linux is generally distributed free of charge. A much larger percentage of Linux users are self-supporting, or they use the user community. Most of them would probably decline any additional warranty on the computer, since it is unneccessary. I do when I get a one now with Windows. But it is the large installed base of neophyte computer users that DO purchase support, unneccesary add-ons and upgrades, as well as pay for help later on when their service has expired, that subsidize cheap computers for the rest of us. These are the same people that sales-people routinely over-sell to. Hardware costs continue to drop, but so does the margin of profit. As a result, it costs more to manufacture a computer that is different from the norm, and they can expect that they will likely lose money on the purchase without increasing the price (and probably even if they do). Incidentally, I would guess that no matter what PC-based system you purchase, money is still flowing to Microsoft. I may be wrong, but I would guess that manufacturers incur fees to Microsoft to ensure compatibility with Windows and to earn the Windows Logo for their products. So the development of the system board, processor, modem, NIC, etc. probably created income for Microsoft already. OK - I've opened my big mouth...flame away! Randy

  425. Re:www.aslab.com - Could you review them? by Confessed+Geek · · Score: 1

    Have your recieved them yet? I am thinking of changing vendors, my current local "put the pieces together guy" is getting out of the buisness, and I'm looking for a new source. Their Storage servers look very reasonable, but the SMP workstations seemed a bit more than I was used to paying for.
    (local vendor puts together dual athlon systems, 1G Reg. ECC Ram, 120G WD HD, Tyan Tiger MB, generic 32M video for about $1500- no Monitor)

    So, do you think they are worth the extra your paying? How are they peforming? Any compatibility issues? Hows their support?

  426. Re:OFFTOPIC: How (not) to get effective tech suppo by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

    Ahh, I see.

    That's understandable. I hate to see that kind of behavior from an Apple technician, but you get that everywhere.

    I'm glad you got the problem fixed. I hope you reported your bad experience to Apple though. Like any company they of course have the idiots on the front line.

    I called once because a brand new G4 (not mine) had what I believed to be a harddrive crash-- banging heads against side of drive upon startup.. you know.. CLANK... CLANK... CLANK.

    I think I bounced through 3 levels of tech support, but all were polite, and the last level technician really knew his shit (though he seemed to be just learning OS X). Of course that was back with 10.1 where you still needed to boot 9 to get just about any maintenance done. It still helps, but for the most part now you can use 10.2 to get everything done.

    Funny thing is, although my boss and I insisted the hard drive must have crashed, in fact it didn't. Apparently something screwed up the boot code for OS X (9 actualy booted fine after setting the startup disk by booting from a CD). I suspect it was an EPSON printer driver. Maybe their drivers are just as crappy on Macintosh as they are on Windows.

    Anyway. So we actually wound up saving the data (using appletalk via OS 9) to my PowerMac and completely wiping the hard drive as per the technicians request. He did actually say it wasn't necessarily required, but that he'd prefer it if we just did it to make sure (as in, god knows what else the user did). As far as I know, we haven't had any more problems with it, and my guess is that there probably was some way to fix it short of a reinstall, but it was easy enough so I did it.

  427. Don't rule out the iBook by Bud · · Score: 1

    The iBook is amazingly sturdy and the size is just right. If it seems "large and bulky" to you, remember that a keyboard is cumbersome to use if it's too small. Also, the price of a laptop goes up as the size goes down. There's a sweet spot where you can get a relatively small laptop for a relatively low price, and the iBook is right there.

    You should also remember that all Apple hardware is built to fit the OS, not the other way around. That is, they designed the user interface FIRST, then they built hardware to run it. Compare this to Wintel/Lintel laptops, where the hardware is given and the OS has to handle all the idiosyncracies. The result is less than pleasing.

    --Bud

  428. Where is the consideration? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    In [Specht v. Netscape], the license was found to be unenforcable, but only because the user didn't have to click on "I agree" or something similar before installing the software.

    In the case of gratis downloadable software, the author may have a better chance of showing its side of the consideration because the author itself provided you with the copy. Commercial software from the shelf of Best Buy is different because the initial contract you create when you pay for the package is between you and Best Buy, not between you and Microsoft.

    Also see Register.COM v. Verio, Inc. where a "by submitting a query, you agree to the terms of this license" clause was found enforcable.

    But in this case, they give up consideration (the search results) at the same time the user did.

    When does Microsoft give consideration in the EULA?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Where is the consideration? by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      Commercial software from the shelf of Best Buy is different because the initial contract you create when you pay for the package is between you and Best Buy, not between you and Microsoft

      In ProCD v. Zeidenberg, a case referenced in Sprecht v. Netscape, the decision reads "Transactions in which the exchange of money precedes the communication of detailed terms are common...A vendor, as master of the offer, may invite acceptance by conduct, and may propose limitations on the kind of conduct that constitutes acceptance....ProCD extended an opportunity to reject if a buyer should find the license terms unsatisfactory; Zeidenberg inspected the package, tried out the software, learned of the license, and did not reject the goods."

      In addition, in this case there was no exchange of software. The OEM version of Windows XP does not include the media required to install the software on another computer, only a "recovery disk" which can be used to restore the Dell machine to its factory state. The seller did not transfer this CD to the buyer, as required by copyright law, and the buyer would have needed to use a different version of XP (the non-OEM version) to install the software on another computer - one which requires a different license than the one he purchased.

  429. Re:www.aslab.com - Could you review them? by wazo2k · · Score: 1

    We are in the process of ordering the systems.
    Their sales department is great, but that's all I can say for the moment.

  430. Re:Metamatic - from another Dell's liker by Genya · · Score: 1

    I like Dell and I have used Dell Latitude XPi for several years but now it is time to change it for more powerful. Is it possible to give old PC back to Dell?

  431. Do a Linux iBook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead and get your iBook, then put YellowDog Linux on it. http://www.yellowdoglinux.com/

  432. Darn, wish I woulda read this yesterday... by Lysol · · Score: 1

    Cuz this weekend I finally admitted it: I'm a mac nut now.

    I've spent quite a few years figuring out what works best for me - gone thru a lot of hardware too. Right before the .con boom, I did an internet company. I ended up using all kinds of Intel boxen, including single cpu dev machines and mp servers. Half of these ran NT, half Linux. Even one ran Oracle 8i when it first hit the Linux street. After we were purchased, laptops were key to showing demos, developing on the plane, etc.

    Fast fwd a few years later and I joined a consulting gig. We deployed a lot of big sites on Sparc/Solaris boxes. Around this time, I was looking for the same thing the orig poster was a settled on a 15" Tibook.

    Now I'm with a company that has all their servers on Linux boxes (over 100 2-way web servers) and just hooked up a IBM 8-way Xeon Linux box for 9i (>1TB database!). We have all kinds of Dell's in the ofc.

    I've seen *a lot* of things come and go and when it came time for me to purchase a machine, I saved up and bought a Tibook. This past December, I got the newer 1gz model. It rules. I like my Linux machines, but I pretty much have it all with my Apple and it's probably the most beautiful comp I've ever owned.

    I have a possible business deal coming up and I've been on the hunt for figuring out what it will take to get a company up and running. I have 2 and only 2 companies in mind: Pogo Linux and Apple. Pogo Linux has the best deals on desktops and I'm really liking a lot of the Apple Xserv stuff. You can run all the server stuff I'd run on Linux. I'll pay a little more for an Xserv than maybe a Pogo server, but the company will be geared for the biotech industry and Macs still do well there.

    iBooks/TiBooks are the only machines I could really justtify buying for myself. The run great, look great, have all my *nix utils I use and need every day, and also run the foofy desktop appz I need for interfacing with the biz people. For me, they were totally worth every penny.

  433. Stay away from Sony by nowen · · Score: 1

    My Sony Vaio laptop died a horrible death. The system would just shut down, not even a blue screen of death - all hardware. Now, my Sony desktop is dying I think the fan is giving out or it's just overheating.

  434. Re:OFFTOPIC: How (not) to get effective tech suppo by g4dget · · Score: 1
    I'm glad you got the problem fixed. I hope you reported your bad experience to Apple though. Like any company they of course have the idiots on the front line.

    I don't think he was an "idiot", he just stated Apple policy. And if you re-read my original posting, you'll see that I didn't even complain about Apple, I merely gave it as an example that you shouldn't expect them to support Linux on an iBook--their ability to support non-Apple products is very limited, just like PC vendors. The "bad experience" I keep having is not with Apple (which I think sells better-than-average systems at a better-than-average price) but with Apple zealots like you, who take any mention of Apple that isn't positively glowing as a cause for a personal jihad.

  435. (OT) Return policies by yerricde · · Score: 1

    OK, I guess you may have a point about the OEM versions (the immediate topic at hand), but I'm still curious as to how to go about returning copies of proprietary computer programs sold at retail:

    ProCD extended an opportunity to reject if a buyer should find the license terms unsatisfactory; Zeidenberg inspected the package, tried out the software, learned of the license, and did not reject the goods.

    Perhaps, but consider the following hypothetical case: I buy a copy of a computer program from a Best Buy store. I open the outer shrinkwrap. I read the EULA which states that I can reject the goods by returning the entire package with unopened inner shrinkwrap to the store. I do not open the inner shrinkwrap because I disagree with some other provision in the EULA. But when I take the package back to the store, the clerk quotes the store's return policy and refuses to honor the EULA because I opened the outer package. Do I have a chance in small-claims court against Best Buy for breach of contract?

    only a "recovery disk" which can be used to restore the Dell machine to its factory state. The seller did not transfer this CD to the buyer

    If the OEM doesn't give the buyer a genuine copy of the recovery disc, then how was I holding my Windows ME operating environment re-installation disc, provided by Dell, in my hand one minute ago? And no, it isn't just a Ghost image containing the initial contents of C:/Windows and C:/Program Files; it seems to have actual Windows .cab files and application setup.exe files on it. I'm not even sure whether or not it checks for a Dell motherboard.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:(OT) Return policies by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      but I'm still curious as to how to go about returning copies of proprietary computer programs sold at retail...Do I have a chance in small-claims court against Best Buy for breach of contract?

      IANAL either, but I think it would be more likely that you would have a case against the software manufacturer. One of the things that ProCD v. Zeidenberg states is that the click-through license is legal because it gives the end-user the chance to cancel the contract by returning the software. If you can't return the software and the manufacturer won't take it back, I think you would have a very good case for invalidating the entire EULA. There is another overriding issue with the OEM versions however. Dell, Compaq/HP, Toshiba and others say that the OEM software is not sold separately from the hardware. You can't get a refund on the OS any more than you could on the CPU or the IDE cables. If you don't agree to the EULA and want a refund, you can get it by returning both the hardware and software for a full refund, less shipping charges. I couldn't find any major cases that had anything to do with the legality of this position - maybe it's one of those "gray areas" that has yet to be challenged. This guy got laughed out of small claims court though.

      ...how was I holding my Windows ME operating environment re-installation disc, provided by Dell, in my hand one minute ago

      Things used to be different. With new systems and XP, all they provide is a recovery CD. The Windows XP .CAB files are probably in there somewhere, but it won't work if you try to install it on another computer.

  436. Check out ASUS laptops? by hfcs · · Score: 1
    I sent an inquiry - here's the response (from notebooktsd@asus.com):

    Hi,
    We do not sell direct, but we have started selling our notebooks without an operating system to our distributors, so you may be able to specify this from your store.


    Sincerely,


    Albert

    ASUS Notebook Support

  437. Re:OFFTOPIC: How (not) to get effective tech suppo by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

    Woah there. I've been using Apple's for less than a year. I'm not saying Apple is all great. They're just like any other company.

    And just like any other company, some technicians will be nice and help you with simple stuff like this, as the parent poster saw.

    Anyway, I apologize for accusing you of being rude with the tech support guy. Obviously I have no clue, it was purely a speculative thing. Obviously I was wrong and the tech support guy just didn't have good customer skills.

    A good technical support rep would have realized that despite the fact that you aren't using it with Apple equipment that it was in fact quite broken. Personally, I would have tried to explain why I was sure it was a hardware problem, and failing that I would have politely asked to speak with a more knowledgeable technician.

    There's no excuse for getting treatment like that from any company. Of course, taking a couple minutes to take it to an Apple authorized reseller isn't too bad of an idea anyway either, unless your neighborhood Apple dealer sucks or is too far away.

    Please don't throw the Apple zealot label around. Granted I'd rather be called an Apple zealot than a Windows user any day of the week. :-)

  438. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by laird · · Score: 1

    3. OpenFirmware-Yes, it's OpenFirmware, but doesn't it have propritary extensions for bootstrapping the OS? I can't install OS X on like an IBM PowerPC Machine. The Mac is NOT totally open-if it was I could do this.

    Actually, back in the days when CHRP/PReP were cool, there was at least one CHRP PowerPC workstation from IBM, and one version of MacOS (7?) that would install and boot on that workstation. So at least in that instance, MacOS wasn't tied to any Mac hardware...

  439. Small, affordable, fast, and a *NIX OS? POWERBOOK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want small, light-weight, a *NIX OS, with not Microsoft tariff? Get the new 12" Apple Powerbook! I've just been migrating my Linux apps to Darwin, and have been in heaven! It's faster and more robust than Linux, and comes on the sexiest hardware around!

  440. Yes, moreso now than ever you f'n commie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move to Iraq, loser.

  441. Buy an iBook and be sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a iBook, Clamshell something with OS 9.1. I traded a rust collecting car for it.

    I put OSX on it and it ran slower than 2 old people fucking. It sucked.

    Suddenly none of my software was useble unless I bought VPC for close to $200.00 No thanks, $200 to run my Windows apps slow?

    It felt wierd walking into a computer store, I was use to all that being there waiting for me to buy, having a Mac ment almost none of it was for me. I found a cool cheap ass CAD program in the bargain bin for $15, nope. Same with a few other neat things I would have liked to use on the go, not one was Mac compatable.

    My printer and scanner wouldn't work with OSX, neither would my USB Smart card reader, since my Digital camera is older and has a serial port, this iBook was almost useless, and definately slow.

    I looked into a new iBook, what the heck, OSX is kinda neat, but they were underpowered for the price and I didn't like being a 2% minority in the computing community.

    I got an ESC Desknote with an AMD XP2000, 512DDR ram, and a cd-rw / dvd combo drive for less than an iBook, 3 times the power, faster ram & fsb, more software and once again I felt at home in a computer store, not like some freakn lepper with an Apple sized coldsore oozing puss from my face.

    Plus, Mac users are to damm wierd for me. I'd tell Apple brains I thought my iBook was shit and they'd start freaking out like I insulted their fat momma. Whats that about?, are all Mac users brainwashed? It was an icky feeling when some dude, probably a fag, messaged to me on some dopey Mac site "Welcome to the Mac community!!" with 10 gay smilies.

    Ok Apple attack parrots, start squaking all that iRhetoric BS about how Macs are better than beer, you know that shit you repeat so much you actually believe.

  442. Want to build a laptop?, look here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.desknote.net

    Buy all the parts you want and party.

  443. Re:I-buddie - ECS (DESKNOTES BEWARE) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a desknote, it comes with ThizLinux if you order with no OS, like I did.

    Some Apple fag at the cyber cafe started talking the usual Mac shit with his 700mhz gay book. The same tired crap about how Macs are superior for audio and how osx was intergrated so well with the hardware, blah, blah.

    So I challenged his stupid ass to a MP3 rip off. So arrogant was this pile of Apple vomit, he never bothered to ask what I had under the hood.

    Big mistake. I bought my DN bare, no cpu, os,ram, nada. Threw in an $109 AMD 2100 and max DDR.

    We took the same exact same wav files off a cd-r I had burned and ripped them to MP3. Not scientific, not fair, but fuck it I was salivating at making an example of this smack talking Mactard.

    Needless to say I threw mofo on the boy, but wouldn't you know it. The fucker still wouldn't STFU. I had to keep reminding him my DN cost less, because watching his discomfort and getting whacked was giving me a boner.

  444. Re:www.aslab.com - Could you review them? by Confessed+Geek · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the update.

    Once they arrive, could you let me know your opinion on them? You can reach me at ehle@NOSPAMMMERS!!.iit.edu if you edit out the caps and "!!"

    Thanks!!

    David.

  445. light linux laptop w/no MS tax by egardner4 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just announced by Lindows: http://info.lindows.com/mobilepc/mobilepc.htm

  446. think this sorts your problems by alpower · · Score: 1

    haven't purchased myself as they haven't released yet but the lindows subnotebook: no ms tax $799 reasonable spec check it here (no personal affiliation - just thought it looked good!)

  447. Re:Why is the Author not willing to pay MS, but Ap by La+Temperanza · · Score: 1

    Already has. It was called a "PC Compatibility Card", but they are long gone and I believe the fastest official ones were 133 mHz Pentiums. :)

    --

    --
    est modus in rebus
  448. linux laptop by DocFloyd · · Score: 1

    Have you checked out Lindows.com? They are now, via idotpc.com and gearzoo.com, selling an $800 laptop. Preloaded with Lindows. 933 mhz VIA C3. 2.9 pounds.

  449. YDL by cosyne · · Score: 1

    I ordered a 12.1 iBook from terrasoft in december- in the end I was so displeased with it that I gave it to my parents as a replacement for their revision A iMac, to run in OSX and not boot to Yellow Dog. Certainly not everything was Terrasoft's fault (I'd be ok with apple's refusal to replace units with dead pixels if it said anything about that in the warranty), but it took longer than they said to get it to me, they didn't configure the machine as I asked, didn't include the passwords when they shipped it to me, didn't properly support the usb mouse they sold with it, and when I sent it back for reconfiguration it took a while. The engineer was nice enough to take the time to set up OpenOffice, but that's supposed to be an included package. I realize that mouse support and such are under development and hard to configure correctly, but if i wanted a not-quite-correctly-configured system i would have done it myself.
    Ok, done ranting. Long story short, i'd try buying an apple and putting debian or mandrake on it if you want PPC linux.