Slashdot Mirror


What Software Do Cable Installers Place on Your PC?

{e}N0S asks: "The cable guy came over to install a cable modem at my Dad's house. As I watched him do his stuff I noticed he was installing something called Broadjump Client Foundation. I know you don't need software for a cable modem to work so I asked if it was necessary. He said he had to do his list of things, and we had to sign that he did his list of things, otherwise he couldn't leave it with us to use. Since I can always remove the software, I agreed, but I noticed while he was flipping through the install, he was clicking 'agree' on every EULA that came up. Doing a search on Google for 'Broadjump Client Foundation' comes up with some pretty scary stuff as far as what it does, like: 'Builds a database of subscriber demographics and buying behaviors to help evolve and refine marketing efforts.' Now, how does this affect us? Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the software; the cable guy did. And is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have this software on their computers is pretty high."

944 comments

  1. he installed by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    nothing.

    he did nothing. i wouldnt let him. i just signed as if he did, to keep him outta shit.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:he installed by dala24 · · Score: 1, Informative

      I actually had him install it while i wasn't there and waddya know, the pc crashed 3 days later... so, i transferred it to my 2nd, didn't install anything and it hasn't glitched in 5 months

      --
      There is no .sig
    2. Re:he installed by AlgUSF · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even better yet, I have DSL. It came as an self-install kit.

      1) Plugged DSL modem into the telephone line

      2) Plugged DSL modem into network hub

      3) Connected filters to telephones

      4) Threw install CD in the trash

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    3. Re:he installed by madshot · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I would just thank him for giving me my modem and show him the door. If he doesn't like it he can call his manager and complain :)

      I NEVER let anyone install any software on my company computers or my home computers that deal with broadband. Next thing you know you'll have spy wear and you can't remove it.

      --
      Obama = Socialism.
    4. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do you use user commands then suddenly change to a subroutine when a perfectly good user command with exactly the same name is available

      You mean sleep()?

      I think it indicates a loop.

    5. Re:he installed by s20451 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next thing you know you'll have spy wear and you can't remove it.

      Yeah, like this.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    6. Re:he installed by _|()|\| · · Score: 2
      2) Plugged DSL modem into network hub

      I hope you mean a router, because a hub is less secure, and can cause you to take more than one IP address.

    7. Re:he installed by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The way the guy explained it to me, there are dozens of people who dont want him touching their computer.

      Then they cant figure it out (yeah, I know it's just turning on DHCP), and have to call him back to set it up.

      If the original work order isn't signed - then there's no proof he ever showed up at all, and the cost of rolling the truck the second time comes outta his pay. If it is, then the customer pays for the second call like he should.

      He really didn't care one way or the other, so long as the work order was signed.

      No need to dump all the anti-corporate conspiracy theory bullshit on the poor joe who gets payed 10 bucks an hour to hookup peoples homes.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    8. Re:he installed by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      I plugged it into a hub, and I take like 3 IP addresses (Verizon has never said anything). Since I don't share things (printers, filesystems) between computers a hub works just fine).

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    9. Re:he installed by Kintanon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just as a note, the cable installer guys get paid per customer, not per hour (based on questions I asked the installer when I had cable from Comcast in baltimore). So they love to get out of there quick.
      It means they made 17$ for 5-10 minutes of their time.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    10. Re:he installed by bheerssen · · Score: 5, Funny

      If he wants to install his software, I point to my mandrake box and say "sure have at it." Gets 'em every time.



      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    11. Re:he installed by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 4, Funny

      I did the same thing, except I pointed at my ancient SparcStation 2, running Solaris 7..

      I thought he was going to rupture something. :)

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    12. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Better yet, I point to the SPARCStation LX running NetBSD. Sir, do you have SPARC binaries for that?

    13. Re:he installed by rw2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the original work order isn't signed - then there's no proof he ever showed up at all, and the cost of rolling the truck the second time comes outta his pay.

      That's a sexy, but untrue story. It's illegal to make him pay for that second truck roll.

      Now, will his bonus, likely correlated to percentage of second visits, be affected. Perhaps.

    14. Re:he installed by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a Mac user, he recognised what my machine was but had no software that he could install on it. What a shame. He then hung around asking me questions about OSX while I made sure I could get to my email servers, various websites, ftp servers and while I pinged a few game servers. Security through obscurity wins again!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    15. Re:he installed by dup_account · · Score: 1

      I don't think people were. I think they are dumping on the corporation that employees the person. Most of the posts till now have been about people getting the person to not install crap on their computer.

      Although it should be made clear buy someone from said company, before the person ever shows up, what the corporation intends to have installed, and the customer should have the option of say "Nope, don't want you installing spyware on my computer", unless "Maybe if you give me free service and equipment, then you can install spyware". That way the corporation is buying my demographics, and I know it.

    16. Re:he installed by Reziac · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is also true for Verizon (the Verizon dude told me about this last time he was here). The reason being most of their field reps now are not really Verizon employees, but are on a sort of outside contract.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    17. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Next thing you know you'll have spy wear and you can't remove it.
      Next thing you know, you might be able to spell.
    18. Re:he installed by gi-tux · · Score: 2

      I guess that I am lucky then. Knology doesn't (or hasn't with me at least) ever installed any software. Their field guys even know a little about Linux, enough to get around and debug problems at least. As a matter of fact, the last install tech that came to replace a bad modem actually preferred to use by SuSE linux box to my kids windows box for checking things out.

      On a side note, the POKE is the double speed on a Tandy Color Computer, I believe.

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
    19. Re:he installed by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 2


      That strategy usually works with Macs, too, btw. While smaller base of applications for a platform is usually a bad thing, when it comes to viruses and spyware it often works to my advantage.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    20. Re:he installed by crossroad888 · · Score: 1

      I also have DSL, and made sure that I was the one to install the modem onto my network, which I didn't even ask the phone company if it was ok. I didn't install the software, in fact I've never installed it for anyone else. I've never seen the point. I mean depending on the network setup, you just have to either set you box to dhcp, or set the static settings, no big deal

    21. Re:he installed by Ironpoint · · Score: 1

      "Then they cant figure it out (yeah, I know it's just turning on DHCP), and have to call him back to set it up. "

      Its not just turning on DHCP, Anybody can do that. What the ISP don't tell you is sometimes you have to jump through hoops to get it to work. Like you sometimes have to set your hostname to something specific before DHCP will work. This was to keep people from hooking multiple computers up without paying an additional $5 per machine or whatever. Of course tech support blindly just tells the people "Turn DHCP ON".

    22. Re:he installed by mobets · · Score: 1

      Not if he is payed by job instead of by hour. If the second visit is just a continuation of the original job, he doesn't get payed for it.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    23. Re:he installed by rabidfox · · Score: 2, Informative

      with some ISP's the install cd is their way of provisioning the modem so their dhcp servers will give you an IP, or let you route outside of the modem. Other ISP's just register the MAC of your modem and let the first 1 to 3 MAC's pull an IP. Sometimes it's called in by the field tech, other times it's registered with the cd

    24. Re:he installed by svirre · · Score: 2

      Some DSL modems have integrated routers. (Like my ISPs Cisco 677i)

    25. Re:he installed by DrFrob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had him trying to get it to work on my linux box and he told me that he wasn't supposed to even touch linux. Needless to say, he didn't install any software.

    26. Re:he installed by mobets · · Score: 2, Informative

      My DSL box is a router :) It didn't come with a CD and my ISP supports linux. Ain't competition grand?

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    27. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True also for Time Warner Cable.

      Even if they come out to your house and spend 2 hours there trying to get something to work, they do not get paid for it at all since the customer was left with no working service.

    28. Re:he installed by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      The cable installer for my old Mac clone (powercomputing powerwave) didn't exactly understand that it was a Mac and not a Windows machine. It took him quite some time to figure it out while I rocked with laughter. Luckily, he had no software to install on it. :)

    29. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hells, no. I wouldn't let a tech anywhere near my linux box.

      Tech: "Hey, I keep hearing about this ReMark command..."

    30. Re:he installed by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      The cable installer for my old Mac clone (powercomputing powerwave) didn't exactly understand that it was a Mac and not a Windows machine. It took him quite some time to figure it out while I rocked with laughter. Luckily, he had no software to install on it. :)

      Don't mock the poor fellow. If he _did_ have any real technical knowledge, you know he'd be with us reading /. all day.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    31. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rupture something too if I found someone trying to run Solaris 7 on a machine that old.

    32. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is ALWAYS a way to remove it. Sure, you are going to have to a good amount of research, but it can be done. We have to do it all of the time. We use AdAware, Anti-Virus programs, DOS ATTRIB, and technical bulletins on which registry hack you have to use or DLLs that have to be replaced to get the blasted thing off. With Windows ME and XP, you will have to prevent it from restoring the stupid registry upon reboot.

    33. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's a sexy, but untrue story.

      I hate when people describe things having absolutely nothing to do with sex as "sexy" (i.e. software, cable company visits, etc.)

    34. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you mean a router, because a hub is less secure

      That's debateable. If the firewall has an exploit then you may as well just have not bothered with it.

      and can cause you to take more than one IP address.

      Why is this bad? NAT is a terrible hack. Public IPs are good. I fail to see the problem here.

      Also, I use that method as well and it works wonderfully.

    35. Re:he installed by me3head · · Score: 1

      Youre right, cable companies tend to have much worse policies than DSL. However, DSL companies need to get with the times and realize that not everyone has a phone line, because some ofus use cell phones as our primary telephone. So unfortunately, this makes cable my only option.

    36. Re:he installed by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      The DSL companies in my area all allow you to use upto 4 IP's,, it's only the evil cable companies that limit you to one,, ar charge extra for them...

      Reece,

    37. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      POKE 65495,0 If you know what this does, you are as old and pathetic as I am


      changes the screen color on a commodore 64?

    38. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My broadband provider claims that linux will not work with our cable internet service. In reality, they just do not have the capabilities to support my prefered OS. I made the mistake of telling a service tech which distro I was running. Not much later my surfing experience completely sucked. After calling them back several more times to figure out what was going on, I told them that I was running Win XP...magicacally, my surfing became much more pleasurable.

    39. Re:he installed by cha0sadddddddd · · Score: 1

      part right.
      independant contractors doing installs get paid per job, company employees get paid per hour.

      --
      Collecting data is only the first step toward wisdom. But sharing data is the first step toward community
    40. Re:he installed by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      Nope, that's POKE 53281.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    41. Re:he installed by Kroppus · · Score: 1

      Well to me it seems like the same problem when you buy something. It comes with a package. And as you install that, you also get a lot of crap that you don't want or need. I had the same with my ISP back in Norway. to get DSL working i had to install their package. It fucked up my pc totally. And somehow my actually paid for registration of Opera disspeared. I sat back with a windows that crashed more often than i drank beer or farted. I had the same problem with my Digi-cam. The installation of the drivers suddenly took 348,75 megabytes of space.. Yea? Eh? I said YES to one thing and ended up with lot of shit i didn't want. After trying XP and plugging in the cam? Eh? Found new harware, installing drivers, etc,,, from my 75 gig disk i didn't even see that it had installed anything on the size of used space. You don't get what you pay for. You get a load of shit more. I've had enough problems with "needed" software on my windows machines as it is. I got away with the DSL guy really simple.. i knew what day he was coming so i took down my pc's and set them in my bedroom and set up my good old Commodore 64. I even connected the damned DOT-Matrix printer and the Floppy station to it. So when he cam in and wanted to install the software to let me connect. I of course showed him my C-64. "This is the one ive used. but a friend of mine is borrowing the modem now." He actually wondered where he should insert the cd... :)))

    42. Re:he installed by redgekko · · Score: 1

      If he is an independent contractor (as are our satellite installers), then he does eat the cost of his fuel and time for making a second trip, or as many trips as necessary to get the paperwork signed that protects my company from rediculious lawsuits.

      --
      Slashdot: rejecting tech news in favor of rubber band guns since 1997.
    43. Re:he installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar story although my tech was foolish enough to sit down in front of my Debian box with enlightenment. His comments after moving the mouse around a bit, "Hey, where's your start button?". Bad form, I know, but I couldn't restrain my laughter.

  2. Have a honeypot by samjam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have a bogus PC or bogus windows installation for him to install junk on, which you can leave "unused" till you need to call support when you can boot into that partition if needed.

    1. Re:Have a honeypot by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      That was my fall back if a flat "NO" wasn't good enough.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:Have a honeypot by dattaway · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I did this the first time I got cable. It was a 486 with Windows95 installed on it. Took the guy 30 minutes to install his warez on it. After he left, I got out my real computer and put the garage sale relic back in the attic.

    3. Re:Have a honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep...backed up the data on my fiance's computer, let the cable guy install, and then did a reformat and reinstall.

      The version of software they used didn't come with Broadjump(the one they ship now does, though) but it was extremely unstable.

    4. Re:Have a honeypot by Sancho · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More amusing would be a Linux machine. Let him try to figure it out. :)

    5. Re:Have a honeypot by meatspray · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They sent me two guys, one 'seasoned' one in training.

      I was running win2k before they supported it, to appease the installers i ran win98 system in a fullscreen VMware. You should have seen the look on their faces when the win2k desktop popped up for a second while the virtual machine rebooted.

      they installed all kinds of stuff, the IE on that image never worked the same again.

      All I had to do was take note of the IP and PC Name, (they were using some funky DHCP via NetBios carp) shut down the vm and cram the IP and Name into the 2k install. bam! instant access.

    6. Re:Have a honeypot by IceFox · · Score: 2

      When the cable guys came to my house they were brought to our 2nd room which has two computers. The first one being my high end one with a Sony 24" widescreeen and Kinesis keyboard. The other one being a Pentium 100 with a 15" monitor. Guess which one they had to install the cable modem too and which one they were not allowed to touch.

      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    7. Re:Have a honeypot by gregRowe · · Score: 1

      When I had to call tech support (bad cable modem) and they made me reinstall my network drivers under windows I just faked it. The tech support guy would say "ok now reboot". I'd then look at my watch and time 30 seconds to a minute and then say "OK, it's booted up now".

      I had to go through this in order to talk to someone that knew what they were talking about and not just reading stuff off of a computer monitor.

      --
      There\'s no place like ~
    8. Re:Have a honeypot by Breakerofthings · · Score: 1

      I did. He couldn't, and just left me the hardware to set up myself ;)

    9. Re:Have a honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long would it take him to install it on a beowulf cluster of 486's with windows 95...blah blah....

    10. Re:Have a honeypot by neitzsche · · Score: 1

      Time Warner/Road Runner (here) does not support Linux. I usually have to borrow someone's Win98 laptop if I feel like harrasing their tech support when their DNS is down. (Hasn't happened recently.)

      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
    11. Re:Have a honeypot by clustersnarf · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had a linux box as my "computer" when the cable guy came out a couple years back. It had Redhat 6.2 or 7 on it. I think it was running the FVWM295 stuff so it LOOKED like windows 95... they guy sat down at it after plugging things in and hit the "start" menu. He looked all over for about a minute till he kinda sheepishly looked at me... I said, It's linux, I better drive. Fired up a terminal, ran dhcpcd and grabbed an address. Sent him on his way. It was kinda funny to mess with his head like that though.

    12. Re:Have a honeypot by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Officially ATT only supports windows machines. Everybody else is out in the cold. I installed the software myself and only recently discovered their spyware. I didn't know that I was getting a bunch of junk.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    13. Re:Have a honeypot by ViXX0r · · Score: 2, Funny

      I did this because at the time I first got DSL, they didn't support Linux at ALL. So I stuck an old 200MB drive in the machine, and put Win95 on it, let him do his thing, then quickly removed the drive and sterlized it by fire :P

      --
      University - a box of academia nuts.
    14. Re:Have a honeypot by clickety6 · · Score: 5, Funny


      Good solution because all non-geeks have at least two or three old PCs just lying around the place for emergenices like this!

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    15. Re:Have a honeypot by jstepka · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ha ha...

      This is why Linux isn't ready for the desktop.

      Linux is only free if your time isn't worth anything to learn it.

      --
      Justen Stepka
    16. Re:Have a honeypot by Bobzibub · · Score: 5, Funny

      My installer (at&t cable) got confused at lilo.

      ; )

      -b

    17. Re:Have a honeypot by sckeener · · Score: 5, Funny

      More amusing would be a Linux machine. Let him try to figure it out. :)

      If the cable company is like my DSL support, then they wouldn't install it. Every time I have to call in problems with my DSL line, I have to lie and say I have a windows 98 pc. They usually then try to get me to do some basic networking troubleshooting. This can be hard to fake if you don't remember off the top of your head what the output is supposed to look like. If they catch me in the lie, I usually play the mad customer (which I usually am at this point) and demand they open a ticket for the issue. :)

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    18. Re:Have a honeypot by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "I did this the first time I got cable. It was a 486 with Windows95 installed on it. Took the guy 30 minutes to install his warez on it. After he left, I got out my real computer and put the garage sale relic back in the attic."

      The thing is, the cable guy would probably have no problem with that, even if he knew what was going on. Hey, he just works for the company and probably knows he's installing malware.

    19. Re:Have a honeypot by dattaway · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Time Warner people out here in Kansas City do not officially "support" Linux, but are in the LUG mailing list, have local usenet newsgroups for related issues, and the tech support people are very helpful. If only all ISPs were like this...

    20. Re:Have a honeypot by kmwertma · · Score: 1

      You aren't honestly trying to attribute the quote in your sig to yourself, are you?

    21. Re:Have a honeypot by Theatetus · · Score: 2, Informative

      they installed all kinds of stuff, the IE on that image never worked the same again.

      I've had that problem with DSL and cable. The stupid client software they force on you installs its own IE. Worse yet, the cable software uninstalled IE6 to install IE5.5

      Apparantly Windows 2000 doesn't like having its IE6 taken away from it, because *nothing* worked after that... Windows Scripting Host was fux0rzd, Explorer was flakey, etc... Oh well... it was one of the last straws that switched me to Linux (which takes the cable without any problems or software -- eat *that*, Comcast), so I suppose I should be grateful.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    22. Re:Have a honeypot by camateg · · Score: 1

      The cable modem people in my area are pretty good about letting you think for yourself, especially when they noticed I had a router in my last apartment, but I was thinking of showing him to my SGI set up in the corner in my new apartment and telling him that was my computer, just to have a little fun.

    23. Re:Have a honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha I did the same thing the guy spent a hour trying to fix 98 and I kept saying "that's okay just go and I'll get to it later" only to toss the old box out after he left. hahahahaha

    24. Re:Have a honeypot by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      Originally, when my service was installed, I was running Win2k. I've had to make a service call or two because the morons didn't properly label my connection out in the box, so they kept disconnecting my cable. When I make a service call and they ask which OS I use, I just say "Windows 2000". The tech came out and reconnected my line. I fired up Slackware 8.1 and asked him if it would be a problem. He said that it wasn't a big deal as long as we could test that it was active. Everything seemed fine, and he went on his merry way, seeming to be actually be kinda impressed with my Linux setup.

      It's good to have a crappy old drive laying around with a Windows installation on it just in case. I mentioned to the installer that if Linux was a problem, then I could swap it out. Generally though, they don't want to wait, so they deal with it so that they can get on with their service calls.

    25. Re:Have a honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when I called for my AT&T install, they asked which version of windows I ran. I told them I didn't run windows, and I hadn't moved in yet anyway so there was no machine to install on. They finally agreed to just leave the cd and modem (still charged me for installation) and then made me jump through hoops on the phone to give them a MAC address to complete the install and activate the service.

    26. Re:Have a honeypot by Ratbert42 · · Score: 2

      VMWare

    27. Re:Have a honeypot by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have Wide Open West (WOW) cable internet, they are very Linux friendly and know how to do it right. BTW, the right way is "Oh you use Linux, I am just supposed to leave the modem here after I run the cable".

    28. Re:Have a honeypot by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      If the cable company is like my DSL support, then they wouldn't install it. Every time I have to call in problems with my DSL line, I have to lie and say I have a windows 98 pc.

      Worse than that for my DSL company is their requirement that I send them reports created from a troubleshooting tool in their software to be installed on my Windows PC.

      It took months to get my connection working because they didn't know what they were doing and then it went down again in another month when they installed DSL on my phone line for a second time (not removing anything from the first installation of course). Each time they screw up, I've got to dig up that damned software, install it on a Win2K box and rework my network so that that machine is connected to the DSL modem instead of my FreeBSD router.

      I hate Verizon.

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    29. Re:Have a honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lincoln, NE, TimeWarner in Linux is ambivilent about Linux.


      I run MDK 8.2. The MCC autodetected the my eth0 NIC and the Toshiba modem and setup dhcp perfectly. I didn't have to do anything except click a couple of buttons to get things going. The guy from TW stood behind me watching, dumbfounded at how easy it was. I told him that Linux doesn't run WinXX EXEs so his CDROM was uninstallable, so the TimeWarner spyware never hit my box, and I don't contribute to their demographic database.

    30. Re:Have a honeypot by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

      True, at my first college apartment, the Time Warner guy came over to install our cable tv. He told us that the installation would cost X dollars, and if we just gave him X, he would install our cable but, to the company, he'd pretend we'd changed our mind (so no billing). We told him that we were getting Road Runner installed next week and we weren't sure how well that idea would fly.

      When the Road Runner guy came, we had half a dozen computers networked together. It was clear we intended to split the connection with NAT, something which was against the terms of service at the time. The tech they sent out couldn't have cared less.

    31. Re:Have a honeypot by matt-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I live in KC and have Time Warner. Every time I call in I start out by saying that I have a Unix box connected and they go into this spiel about how they don't support it and thanks for calling. I can usually catch them in time to say "oh wait, I have a Windows box too.." and then after they walk me through "reinstalling the TCP stack" I eventually get to talk to a real tech (generally 45 minutes to an hour later). They may be on the LUG list and all, but you'd never see evidence pointing to that based on their piss poor tech support.

    32. Re:Have a honeypot by RobertTheBrute · · Score: 1

      This "don't support Linux, but we're cool with it" attitude is very similar to NTL's here in Glasgow, but, better still, the cable guy didn't install anything except the cable. I hadn't even bought the computer when he came and he was happy.

      Mandrake did everything for me - I shoved in the disc, went for a coffee, and when I came back there was the Sashdot front page.

      --
      Nemo me impune lacessit
    33. Re:Have a honeypot by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2

      Same here. The guy that did mine even let me borrow his drill to make some holes for routing cat-5. Damn those 100 year old tenament buildings, the walls are over a foot and a half thick! Much easier when you have the correct tools...

    34. Re:Have a honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey you must have verizon too. One time my dsl internet connection was reallly reallly slow. So i called and did there dance of networking jumble. Which i had already did to find the problem. Because they wouldnt take my word for it that the modem was dead. Finally after two weeks of steading calling they fianlly gave up and gave me a free new modem.Not only that if they had just listened to me i would had the modem 2 weeks earlyier i am not a retard.

    35. Re:Have a honeypot by shanebush · · Score: 2, Funny

      Same fer me, but by a different method... The cable installer guy insisted he setup the machine, so I let him...

      However, I had installed win98 in a VMWare virtual machine and had that running full screen when he did the setup... I patiently watched him setup the virtual windows and when he was through, signed off on it. Then I took my seat back, dropped the windows virtual machine back to a window and closed it. He had this strange look on his face when he realized what happened.

      Oh well, he did his job.

    36. Re:Have a honeypot by upper · · Score: 2

      I did exactly that. The techs couldn't get it to see either the network card I had in it (which worked fine under linux) or the network card they brought. I didn't care, so eventually they gave up and recorded their work as a "self install".

    37. Re:Have a honeypot by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2
      You aren't honestly trying to attribute the quote in your sig to yourself, are you?

      No, he's not. His signature is "Justen Stepka", nothing more.

      To avoid making this mistake again, go to your slashdot Preferences:Comments page, and turn on signature dash (according to the page: Prefix everyone's signature with "--" to make it blazingly obvious where comment ends and sig begins).

      HTH

      Tim

    38. Re:Have a honeypot by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      They must have changed the way they work. I've had my DSL modem plugged into my Linux box since I got the service. Plugged it in to see if it would just work like my cable modem did and it did. Thankfully I didn't have to go through all the mess of setting up the PPPoE software on linux.

    39. Re:Have a honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've since moved to DSL, but when the cable guy came i threw my ol' NeXT on the desk, and told him he could do anything he wanted to it.

      "um...how do you turn it on" ?

    40. Re:Have a honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to have some work done on the cable line awhile back, the installation guy was ready to work on the pc. He looked at my desktop (window maker), looked at my other geek paraphinallia, looked at me and said "well, probably better if I let you handle this huh"...yep

      The moral of the story, always lay out your most intimidating geek stuff before you let anyone else look at your pc, lest they think they are worthy of mangaling it.

    41. Re:Have a honeypot by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Every time I call in I start out by saying that I have a Unix box connected and they go into this spiel about how they don't support it and thanks for calling. I can usually catch them in time to say "oh wait, I have a Windows box too.." and then after they walk me through "reinstalling the TCP stack" I eventually get to talk to a real tech (generally 45 minutes to an hour later)."

      I do believe that you are taking a backwards approach to getting your problems solved. Your goal is to get past the first line support monkeys who can only read from a script. You can accomplish this by lying.

      This means that you have a Compaq Presario with Windows ME. You run Interent Explorer to browse and Outhouse Express to e-mail. The DSL bridge is plugged directly into the NIC. You don't know what linux is. You have never heard of linux. You need to be told that Control Panel is under start > settings. Just follow their lead and fit the mold of a clueless luser. This will allow them to get through their script as fast as possible and pass you along to the more senior techs who have a clue.

    42. Re:Have a honeypot by zobo · · Score: 1
      ...(they were using some funky DHCP via NetBios carp)...

      Sounds a little fishy to me.

      --
      83chrise.nuf
    43. Re:Have a honeypot by dave_f1m · · Score: 1

      I'm going to guess... The high end one? No? Well, you missed some fun. I made a installer use my Kinesis, in Dvorak. After about 30-45 minutes, he gave up on my modem, and wanted to trade me my modem for one in the van. Even swap. So, he goes out to the van to get, and comes back in to me browsing Slashdot in Linux. So I tell him everything is fine, keep your modem.

      - dave f.

    44. Re:Have a honeypot by sulli · · Score: 1
      My installer (at&t cable) got confused at lilo.

      I bet he was in stitches.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    45. Re:Have a honeypot by Open_Sauce · · Score: 1

      Every time I have to call in problems with my DSL line, I have to lie and say I have a windows 98 pc.

      Interesting.... I've often had to lie, too. I wonder what this technique does for Win/Linux/Mac stats on OS usage from 'industry analysis' type sources.

      If many linux users are bullied into lying about their OS, no wonder there are OS monopoly concerns!

    46. Re:Have a honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score 5 Interesting? That was +5 fucking hilarIOUS!! Way to go man.

    47. Re:Have a honeypot by Felinoid · · Score: 2

      I have Win 95 on a spare HD in my computer just for the cable company.

      But I'm lucky becouse they are cool about me using Linux as long as they don't need to support my os and I use Windows for tech support calls.
      "You make it work on Winows I'll make it work on Linux"

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    48. Re:Have a honeypot by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      Windows is only user friendly if you don't care if it works.
      The oft made explenation fpr ALL of Windows problems is user stupidity.
      In short Windows fakes being user friendly but when it comes down to the brass it's a hell of a lot harder to install and config than Linux.

      The rest is user apps and the user friendlyness of an app is totally up to the vender and indupendant of the os.

      Linux isn't consummer friendly becouse nobody is spending thousands to convence the public that Linux is the greatest thing sence sliced bread and anyone who says otherwise is a brainwashed cult folowing hippy.

      Oh btw: You are right. Linux isn't consummer ready. Nither is Windows.
      But the consummer is Linux ready.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    49. Re:Have a honeypot by matt-fu · · Score: 1

      I do believe that you are taking a backwards approach to getting your problems solved.

      You are quite correct. That is why I solved said problem by turning to the other local cable internet provider, Everest. My new service was installed today and I've now got 3Mb/s downstream instead of the 2Mb/s before to go with my freedom from ridiculous TW/RR. The install tech didn't even know what DHCP was but he was cool with plugging in the cable modem and letting me take it from there.

  3. Self Install Kits by Rayonic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why I always opt for the self-install option with any ISP. I don't even like my wife messing with my computer, nevermind some complete stranger.

    (Side note: Yes, she does have her own computer. So there. :P)

    1. Re:Self Install Kits by TheDick · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh

      Thats bullshit.

      95% of our customers Self Install, and we have no such fucking software. Our customers THINK we do, because the shitty Toshiba cable modems we hand out have USB ports. I've had "network admins" call in bitching about not being able to install the software for the cable modem, that they've hooked up to their router. *smack*

      --

    2. Re:Self Install Kits by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Thats gotta suck. Here in Tallahassee, FL comcast will let us do self install. I guess it is all about laws, never thought that state laws could prohibit a cable company from allowing you to mess with your own stuff.

    3. Re:Self Install Kits by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      that's funny... my brother just got cable service from comcast in RI. there was a self-install option and they even gave him a free cable modem just for signing up. i don't even think they had any software to install on his computer. the cd they gave him didn't even work, it had no information on it. i found that pretty funny, but it was just a guide to setting things up i think.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    4. Re:Self Install Kits by xtremex · · Score: 1

      I have Optonline (Cablevision)..I bought the Cable modem for $100 aththe Wiz and I plugged my cable wire into it..I then called them up and send to connect me...took them 5 days..but they did it. No fuss, no mess..

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    5. Re:Self Install Kits by guybarr · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I don't even like my wife messing with my computer, nevermind some complete stranger.

      (Side note: Yes, she does have her own computer. So there. :P)


      funny. I'd have thought her credit-card and other vital info are as important as yours.

      I actually think one should take MORE care with a non-technical spouse's security.

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
    6. Re:Self Install Kits by talon77 · · Score: 1

      Actually, they push the self-install option pretty hard here in Nebraska.

    7. Re:Self Install Kits by pantropik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also in Tallahassee, FL. When I first got cable I just went out, picked up a free self-install kit, came home and had it up and running in a few minutes. All it took was a phone call to give them the MAC address and modem serial number. The modem is a Toshiba with USB and Ethernet, which is great.

      I've had the cable guy over here a few times to check my lines (once when the idiot landscapers chopped the cable to bits at the box outside). I told tech support and the cable guys that I use Linux. Best I can tell, they don't particularly care, especially since my machines are behind a router anyway. One of the cable guys might even be using Linux now. He was so impressed with my setup I let him play around with it a few minutes.

      Anyway, were those the United States he was talking about? I don't think so. Comcast would rather you self-install, at least here ... the service techs seem to be seriously overextended as it is. If they had to do all the installations the waiting list would be huge (already takes ~1 week to get a tech out if something goes wrong).

      Back to the actual topic: the Comcast CD in the self-install kit is crap. Pretty much wrecked my roommate's XP box with its custom IE install. I didn't notice any spyware, but I was deleting everything and starting over, so I didn't really pay attention. When I showed him he didn't need it in the first place (despite what the kit says) he wasn't very happy.

    8. Re:Self Install Kits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You can't self install with a cable modem. It's illegal in most states


      I did a "self install" in CA. It amounted to the cable gut connecting the modem to the cable, watching the lights on it flash, and calling the office to make sure the modem was showing up on the network.

      He then handed me a box containing piece of cat5, some books and a CD. (I imaging that the CD had some kind of software on it, but I never bothered to take it out of its sleeve) I threw the box in a corner somewhere and didn't have to undo anything.

      For not installing their customized browser crap, (and god knows what else) they took $50 off the install.

      Sweet.

    9. Re:Self Install Kits by enneff · · Score: 2

      Exactly where does he say he's not taking care of her security?

      He just said he doesn't like anyone (including his wife) messing around with his computer.

    10. Re:Self Install Kits by catfood · · Score: 2

      And who said she was non-technical?

    11. Re:Self Install Kits by warpSpeed · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I don't even like my wife messing with my computer, nevermind some complete stranger.

      My kids, my wife, and my mother do not have admin access on thier win2k machines (they each have thier own). If something breaks I have to fix it. Thats part of the deal for maintaining thier machines.... I aint got no time for no windoz viri, or spyware.

    12. Re:Self Install Kits by ericvids · · Score: 1
      I don't even like my wife messing with my computer, nevermind some complete stranger.
      Hmmm, if I had wife I wouldn't want her to mess with some complete stranger either, never mind with a computer.... um, I don't think I want to pursue *that* line of thought...
      --
      Pet peeve: Profane people propagating perfunctory pedantry.
    13. Re:Self Install Kits by Hi_2k · · Score: 1

      Im the eldest son, with a Techie father who's never around, a mother who insists she knows how to administrate a computer because she sold VAX's to companies in the dark ages, and two siblings who love to download the spyware of the week, All of whom insist they have administrator access on MY PERSONAL MACHINE so they can "Use it properly", allowing any ground whatsoever is suicide. Atleast im building karma for judgement day!

      --
      When life gives you crap, Make Crapade.
      Sluggy Freelance.
    14. Re:Self Install Kits by enneff · · Score: 1

      Good point.

  4. Don't worry about it by tkrotchko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you want theoretical advice or practical?

    Theoretical:
    If you feel you can't live with the restrictions or you and your machine, then drop the service and use something else.

    Practical
    Just wipe the stuff off the machine after the guy leaves.

    You can only analyze this stuff so far.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Don't worry about it by windex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On top of that, any cable company will let you demand to do a self install, and just drop off the cable modem or ship it UPS.

      The worst case scenerio is that you set it up before he gets there and go "I used to have it in my old apartment/house/whatever, it's already setup. Just plug it in and I'll sign your service order". No human cable technician is going to turn down getting out of doing work.

      Makes me wonder how old the submitter was to where he couldn't just say "No, thanks, I'll install it myself".

    2. Re:Don't worry about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Practical
      Just wipe the stuff off the machine after the guy leaves.


      Unfortunately this doesn't delete the EULAs the guy may already have signed. Just suppose that one of them contained some no-deletion clause.
      IMO the best solution, as another user pointed out, is to keep ready some old machine to let the cable company guy put their junk on, then use the good one.

    3. Re:Don't worry about it by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      The person that owns the computer is not bound by the EULA if they did not accept it. In this case, with the "circus technician" clicking all the EULAs, the owner should delete all that crap with no qualms whatsoever.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    4. Re:Don't worry about it by kannibul · · Score: 1

      Yes, but then again - you didn't click "agree" -the tech did.

    5. Re:Don't worry about it by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      let you demand a self install? Heck, at the time warner affiliate where I got it, self install is one of the options given and is $40 cheaper

    6. Re:Don't worry about it by rjune · · Score: 1

      If you are really worried, boot your (Windows) computer from the floppy and type:

      fdisk/mbr

      That is a thermonuclear solution to termites but it is very effective!

    7. Re:Don't worry about it by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      You gave him permission to use your computer, so maybe you are responsible. This is a legal issue, really - it doesn't really matter what you personally think should happen.

    8. Re:Don't worry about it by Syncdata · · Score: 2

      I just finally got hooked up with a cable connection recently, I just called the installer "dude" a lot, and when it came to the installation of software, I just signed off on everything having been installed. He gets the job done quickly, gets a good performance evaluation, I don't have to worry about ad/spyware. Win/Win.

      --
      "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    9. Re:Don't worry about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Practical
      >>Just wipe the stuff off the machine after the >>guy leaves.

      >>You can only analyze this stuff so far.

      Please try a little MORE analysis: Lots of spyware does not easily allow removal. So if wiping your drive (that you've beeen using for 3 months with mail and WINMX download....) sound like fun to you... Does not to me.

      You can take my braodband when you pry the mouse from my cold dead hand.

      Honeypot's the way to go... Let them hook it up to a Pentium 90 with a 2 GB hard drive...

    10. Re:Don't worry about it by wizman · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, not every cable company will allow this.

      Instead of Time Warner, Adelphia, or any of the big guys, we have a moderately sized local cable provider who does everything in house. Their policy is simple - an appointment must be made for anything.

      About a year ago, I cancelled my cable connection and changed to DSL. My DSL connection was absolutely wrechid, so I switched back to cable. I stopped by the cable office and asked for a modem. Even though I explained that the outlet is still there, the computer is still configured, and everything was ready, they -HAD- to send an installed.

      Luckily the installers have always been pretty understanding. When I showed him my Linux box, he said "you're probably better off configuring this than me." :) When I did have them once set it up on a Windows machine, they did not put on any type of software at all, it was all basic.

      My recommendation - stay away from any provider that would accept EULA's and install software without giving the customer any other option. Even without the software, who knows what other types of things you might be agreeing to by using their service. If you have DSL available, find a reliable local ISP that resells it. Then you can usually get goodies like IP blocks, and you can get to know your tech support staff directly.

    11. Re:Don't worry about it by tombeard · · Score: 1

      FWIW, fdisk /mbr only rewrites your master boot record, not the partition. Unless he installed an mbr virus it will not accomplish what you think.

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    12. Re:Don't worry about it by japhmi · · Score: 1

      I actually tried to do this when I had a cable installer, but I'm too nice to really push it. He told me that if it didn't work his job would be on the line, so I desided to be nice and let him do his stuff. I had just installed a fresh Win98SE on a system so that he could just through his trash on there and then I would wipe it out. It ended up that the computer was 'too old' (it was the P100 that I got when I went to college back in '96) and that they didn't support anything that old. Now, all of my computers (old win98, win2kpro, linux, FreeBSD) work fine through a router!

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    13. Re:Don't worry about it by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      When I had my @Home cable modem installed (way before AT&T took it over) I had already run the line from the feedthrough and installed the requisite filter, and had cleared a spot off the top of my server with the RJ45 and co-ax lines hanging there. They were perfectly happy to give me the box and a cheerful "sign here please."

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  5. Inquiring minds must know... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What cable internet provider was this?

    1. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What cable internet provider was this?

      Dunno what this guy used, but certainly ATTBI/MediaOne/whatever does this.

      Broadjump is the biggest piece of shit software I've ever seen. It reboots your computer whenever possible (god forbid they should check to see if you're running on 2K/XP which doesn't need to be rebooted to renew DHCP). You also need that program to register your MAC address with them. I could have made a fuss, but it wasn't worth it. I installed, registered, and de-installed. No more problems.

      They certainly don't require that you leave it installed, except for Tech Support. Which so far has been easy, because if it's a problem with the line, you simply call and report that cable TV is out. Then they don't ask you to reboot your computer 500 times.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    2. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by nege · · Score: 2

      and power cycle your modem! I had to power cycle the modem 3 times, and reboot the PC 3 times while getting my cable installed this weekend.

    3. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by operagost · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows 9x doesn't need to be rebooted either.
      Run "winipcfg", select the ethernet adapter, click Release, then Renew.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have ATTBI/MediaOne and they don't use this crap. No software to register the MAC either. If I change the NIC I have to call them up though.

      Anyway, they couldn't install if they wanted to, unless it runs under WINE that is.

    5. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't limited to ISPs. I found this on my friend's machine (he has cable, I don't yet). I called up our provider, Adelphia, and inquired as to whether it's part of their required installation package. The rep told me it wasn't. And then he asked if I (or my friend in this case) had Morpheus or KaZaA installed. Wouldn't you know it, he has both on his machine (though he has KaZaA Lite, which is supposedly Spyware free).

      This is shockingly similar to those "Bonus Club Cards" you get at supermarkets. You think you're getting a great deal on your load of groceries, but what they're really doing is tracking your shopping habbits so they can target market more effectively. Sneaky, isn't it. They tell you about the "great deals," but not about the fact that they've assigned you a number and are keeping track of every single purchase you make at their store. Would you sign up if you knew it was a real world Spyware tactic?

      Programs like this aren't necessary for Cable Modem installation. All you really need to do is plug the thing in, call the ISP, and have them set your modem up on their server. Bang. Signal, and you can happily go about downloading pirated music and software. People need to get in the habbit of sitting there with the installation technician and ask him what each and every step does instead of being ignorant to everything. Yes, the tech (at least should) know what he/she is doing, but so should you. They say the best kind of learning is "hands-on," after all.

      If more people would pick up on that, then we geeks wouldn't be bothered by the "normals" calling us begging for help because they did something stupid...

    6. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by R.Caley · · Score: 5, Informative
      They certainly don't require that you leave it installed, except for Tech Support. Which so far has been easy, because if it's a problem with the line, you simply call and report that cable TV is out.

      I'd like to underline this. For anyone who hasn't learned by painful experience yet, never report anything to the interent suport people if you have TV from the same source.

      Anything which goes wrong is in one of two classes, things shared with the TV operation and things their tech support stands no chance of fixing. The TV operation will be far better resourced, and the support staff know that you may have 5 children demanding cartoon network at your end and so not fixing things may result in you being driven insane and turning up at their call center with a chainsaw. Nerds just don't carry that fear factor:-)

      Certainly when I had a problem which seemed to be at my end, my cable suppler (Telewest) quoted a couple of weeks for an engineer from the internet side and day and a half for a TV bod.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    7. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      are you on drugs?

      ATTBI does NOIT need anything to register your MAC with them... they dont give arats ass about your MAC address..

      I have changed the nic card in my pc at least 15 times and finally slapped in a SMC firewall on the cable modem... it never stopped working or has any trouble that the MAC address changed at least 10 times...

      ATTBI does not care about your MAC address on your PC. and your cable modem (if you got it from them) is pre-configured and tested before it comes to your home.

      dont spread lies man.... it's not right.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by DeLukas · · Score: 1

      I know Cox Cable uses broadjump.

    9. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      In fairness you don't need to win 98/ME do you? winipcfg certainly lets you dhcp release/renew fine under ME, and I doubt it was any different under 98.

      --

      jh

    10. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I daresay the difference lies in that most people don't care if the supermarket knows what you're buying, as they can freaking well notice what your purchases are as the cashier rings them up. Big deal that they're "spying" on that. And quite frankly, it's somewhat helpful, as products that get purchased a lot get placed in locations that are easier to access (the middle shelves, for example).

      Sure, I might get some more snail-mail spam (oh wait, no, I'm not), but to compare this computer spyware to the grocery card thing is a bit much.

      Frankly, the computer spyware upsets me more. Side note: Anyone know how much (if any) spyware that Dell/Gateway/whoever stick on laptops and computers they sell?

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    11. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by bonsaiburner · · Score: 1

      I use NTL cable over here in the UK, which also comes with the broadjump software. Luckily for me, NTL defaults to 'self-install', and you pay more for the techs to set up your own PC.

      The 'BJ' software (ironic eh?) is not necessary at all, it just provides a local interface to the initial system (MAC Addy) registration and provides status/testing tools for the connection once its installed and working.

      Needless to say I didn't even break out the CD ;)

    12. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Certainly when I had a problem which seemed to be at my end, my cable suppler (Telewest) quoted a couple of weeks for an engineer from the internet side and day and a half for a TV bod.

      I do find one thing good about modem-only problems: it's really easy to get a reasonably technical person to slip up and say something they shouldn't while you're troubleshooting a problem. I've had 2nd tier tech support people actually tell me that they guarantee things that are not guaranteed anywhere in the contract, and have had problems fixed that most ISPs would simply ignore. The problem, of course, is getting past that first person on the phone, which usually involves either talking way over their heads or faking the steps they want you to take (or just doing them, whichever, no skin off my back unless they ask me to install software).

      Then again, most of the places I've been have the TV installed on a completely seperate line. There's got to be a really big problem for both to go down.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    13. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Some cable providers do check your mac-addie, of course you can just press the little reset button on the cablemodem every time you switch pcs/nics and it works just fine....

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    14. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      ATTBI does not care about your MAC address on your PC. and your cable modem (if you got it from them) is pre-configured and tested before it comes to your home.

      Most cable companies actually need the MAC address on the cable modem itself, not for your NIC. If they ship you the cable modem, then they take down the MAC address before they send it to you. If you buy one yourself from somewhere else, then they need you to give them the MAC address. Generally, none of the software they want to install has anything to do with the MAC address, though.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    15. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 4, Informative
      ATTBI does NOIT need anything to register your MAC with them... they dont give arats ass about your MAC address..

      This is true NOW. It was not true in August of 2002. They only just switched their policy recently. NOW, they only care about your cable modem's MAC addr. As recently as two months ago, however, they cared very much about your computer's MAC addr.

      What used to happen, was you could get a broken DHCP lease, that only worked for registering with them. Connecting to anything else resulted in dropped connections. Oh, and the lease was only valid a short period of time.

      Of course, this is the case in the Boston Area. AT&T Broadband exists in other areas, and may have different policies elsewhere, but I don't care about that, since I don't live there.

      dont spread lies man.... it's not right.

      Don't spread ignorance, man, it's not right...

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    16. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Casualposter · · Score: 1

      Amen!!!

      When the cable modem is out, we check to see that the cable is on. If not, call the TV folks. You can get them on the phone and they fix the problem quick.

      When we've had to call tech support, anything that required a service crew took three weeks. But if the problem was with the cable box, the service crew took less than 48 hours even in December.

      --
      Creative Spelling Copyright (2002). May use without Persimmons
    17. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by R.Caley · · Score: 2
      Then again, most of the places I've been have the TV installed on a completely seperate line. There's got to be a really big problem for both to go down.

      Maybe it's different in other places but here (UK) the reason the cable companies can provide broadband and telephones is that they already have the network in place. So most failures turn out to be network related and affect TV too. In fact my TV box is more sensitive to noise than the cable modem, so a coupe of times I have had TV jitters etc. but the internet was fine.

      AIUI the other main UK cable company (NTL) doesn't provide a separate cable modem at all, just uses an outlet on the TV box.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    18. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up! A real timesaver if you have to work on Win95/98 machines all the time.

    19. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got screwed by ATTBI couple months ago too.

      After 3 appointments that no one ever showed up ( they said they came and I wasn't home, which is ridiculous since there is only one entrance to my apartment and I was standing in front of it ), a contractor came over. He told me ATTBI always overbooked with their customers, which means they always take more appointments then they can take for each hour. It takes 20 mins to do a job in average, but they'll take 5-6 appointments. Now you can see why they have that "two hour time frame" for their appointments. He brought in a new Thomson modem and hooked it up to the coex, the CM registers, he told me to "do the rest yourself" and left.

      Knowing it is not necessary to use that "installation CD," I hooked up my PC and got my IP, and guess what, there is a proxy blocking the access to the net. ( sas.ne1.attbi.com ) Dreadful to use the CD, I called up "tech support." I asked the person answering the phone what's on the CD, and he said I have to use that CD in order to "register" myself onto their network.

      I repeatingly asked him what's on that CD, he just said run it and everything will be okay like a broken LP. When I requested to talk to a "technician," he yelled at me and said "I AM A TECHNICIAN! That CD was give for a reason. Run that CD and things will work. It is not a virus." I asked for his name and want to have a word to his supervisor and the line went dead. ( "Accidents" at the right time. )

      Knowing I have no choice, I put that CD in. First thing it backups the registry, then the "EULA" for using the ATTBI service appears. After checking the TCP/IP settings, ZoneAlarm caught three programs trying to access the net. One is "Client Foundation," second one is "Smart Flow," I don't remember the third one now. The installation process couldn't continue until I let them pass through my Firewall. ( Someone get a packet sniffer on and see what's beign sent? )

      The "installation" of the unknown software bundle took over 30 minutes and it crashed. After rebooting, besides the software mentioned aboive, I found the CD was actually installing IE onto my machine! Since I'm running Japanese version of Win98SE, the installation of *English* version of IE screws up ALL my system / window menus. So I ended up with half of settings in Japanese and half in English!

      Absolutely furious, I nuked the English IE, got most of the menus back and called "tech support" again. ( I still couldn't access the net at that point. ) The air-head lady on the phone said my "registration process" was complete and I should be all set, yet I still couldn't get through the proxy. After her preached from the "tech support manual" [ please power cycle your cable modem, please reboot your PC, etc ] and pinging the modem, the thing eventually worked.

      After this completely dreadful experience, if there is a choice, I'll never use ATTBI again. Until this day, they still bombard me with annoying flyers and telephone marketing calls though.

      --Alek

    20. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > AIUI the other main UK cable company (NTL) doesn't provide a separate cable modem at all, just uses an outlet on the TV box.

      Not on our setup. We have a separate cable modem. I think it depends on the NTL Franchise you're in - some issue modems, some have the modem integrated with the TV box.

    21. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's different in other places but here (UK) the reason the cable companies can provide broadband and telephones is that they already have the network in place. So most failures turn out to be network related and affect TV too. In fact my TV box is more sensitive to noise than the cable modem, so a coupe of times I have had TV jitters etc. but the internet was fine.

      Here (in the US) the networks coincide in a lot of places, but they (at least used to) run a seperate cable to the house for the cable modem. They might be changing this, especially with all the self-install kits and so on, but most of the time one or the other goes out, but not both without a serious problem. Then again, the things that take down the cable modem are usually things like servers going down (DNS, DHCP, etc), while the TV practically has to lose power or have a cut line to go down. The TV usually does have more problems with noise and such on the line, but then most people don't notice most of the problems on the modem anyway because of error correction.

      Personally, I've made a lot of support calls to the cable company about problems that 95% of their customers never notice, like getting 100 ping to the first hop of any route (in other words, on the internal cable company network), 30% packet loss, and so on. Those types of problems have almost no noticable affect on browsing websites, and very little noticable affect on streaming audio/video (after the extended buffering period), but as soon as you fire up a real-time game you notice, a lot (as opposed to turn-based games, my uncle plays chess over the internet and never notices a problem unless his ping is unusually high or network dropouts are causing connection problems to the chess server).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    22. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      The same situ here. When I switch to DSL(I moved and the address had a bt line instead) I opted for the self install pipex package. I am extremely wary about what I install. With Pipex- I didnt need to register MAc addresses or anything. I dont recommend the cable modem they ship - I bought the rather decent one from DABS with an onboard router and nat.. not bad for 80squids at the time.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    23. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Tinik · · Score: 1

      They do in my area. Whenever I change my NIC, I have to call them up and read off my new MAC so they can register it in their system.

    24. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      In fact, it's hard to see how software on your computer would know the MAC address of the other side of the cable modem anyway, unless there's some special cable modem communication protocol I'm unaware of.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    25. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Dunno what this guy used, but certainly ATTBI/MediaOne/whatever does this.

      The hell they do. They came and installed for me and just plugged a jack into my Lynksys router. No software was installed on the PC.

    26. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has got to be Charter Communications. Which so happens to be owned by Paul Allen. I'm an installer for Charter, and they use that particular software.

    27. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by R.Caley · · Score: 2
      Here (in the US) the networks coincide in a lot of places, but they (at least used to) run a seperate cable to the house for the cable modem.

      Not here, but then I can't say it would make a difference. I've never had a problem with the line to my home (even when, at my previous flat, the installers complained that the box they had to connect me to was flooded and he was working up to his elbow in water).

      OTOH, just after I got cable They (another They, not the cable people) started all of the water mains in this part of the city, and water company machinery seems to be magnetically attracted to cable company cable runs... so maybe I have over-experienced network breakdowns.

      (and needless to say, they resurfaced the main road into town a week or two before they dug it all up for the water mains... not that this is /. material, but sometimes you just have to winge... must shut up, starting to treat /. as usenet...)

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    28. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      The 'BJ' software

      Does that work with Fufme units?

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    29. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      Or just yell at them, and call them "Cable monkeys", Always seemed to work for me. (Shaw Cable) Until I got DSL.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    30. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by aWalrus · · Score: 1
      I have had problems with my cable modem (no TV line related, just screwed up my access to the internet). I wouldn't recommend buying your cable modem, especially in Mexico, where the voltage varies wildly. I have a spike eliminator connected to all my stuff, but no UPS. The guys at the cable company replaced it very fast and the install guy told me they had been getting calls for the same kind of problem all over the place (the modem wasn't burnt, but it wasn't sending the signal correctly. If that had been my modem I'd be 300 dollars short and renting the new modem anyway...

      And about the linux threads: the guy who installed it noticed I had linux in my computer and got all enthusiatic and helped me set everything up (a few years ago, it was still somewhat difficult to set up my network card).
      --

      --
      Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
    31. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2

      Nah, they still are integrated in all the franchises. Both run off the same cable into your house and go into a y-piece splitter. The cable TV box itself runs on IP (you can find it's address in the service menu). If the problem lies beyond your front door, chances are that both TV and internet will have problems.

    32. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Yablo · · Score: 1

      why don't you just setup a firewall or router of some sort? i'd have to assume calling them to change MACs is a pain in the ass...

    33. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by nderose · · Score: 1

      Dunno what this guy used, but certainly ATTBI/MediaOne/whatever does this.

      Not in my experience... having my cable modem installed by AT&T they just came in, hooked it up and got lock.
      That was it.

    34. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, Broadjump is spyware--that's it. It also apparently installs some form of "advanced tech support"--read: it sends everything you have in your computer to the ISP at regular intervals. It's not good stuff.

      It wastes resources (like all spyware, heh), and it really does a whole load of nothing.

      I know Comcast does this too--back when it was Comcast@Home, I never had it, but as soon as it becamse Comcast.net, they shipped out a new install CD that you apparently needed to install to get any service with the new system. Well, knowing that that's a big blatant lie, I didn't touch the thing. Went to my friend's house a few weeks later, and lo and behold, there's Broadjump.

      It's just like Gator or whatever Kazaa and all that crap installs now... utterly worthless.

      But, the thing is ALL cable ISPs do this. It's just too profitable not to... you get almost every person who signs up for your service not only paying you but giving you information that you can sell...

    35. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      sorry but even in the @home days they didn't care...

      I know been working there for 3 years.. and a MAC address on the true ATTBI network was never needed or even wanted.

      any installer telling you otherwise is making things up... and that doesnt suprise me as the installers are not rocket scientists..

      the MAC address of the modem is needed for provisioning, but it instantly reports upon turn-on. and if you buy one yourself they ask for the MAC number on the phone wne they set up the account.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    36. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey buddy, I don't know how to tell you this, but I'm running Mandrake with ATTBI. No problems, except some basic tech support problems.

      TS: First go to your start menu and choose internet settings.
      ME: You mean my K menu?
      TS: K menu?
      ME: Yeah, oh wait. I should reboot to my windows partition. I think I've got a windows box running, though, hang on.
      TS: How many computers do you have plugged in?
      ME: 3.
      TS: We don't support home networks.

      And so forth. Turned out that there was a shortage, meaning the cable fell off, and it was literally right down the street. I should leave the house every now and then...

      Anyway, I'm using a Netgear router (it was free! no trash-talking), and I don't have a damn piece of at&t software installed, and I don't have ANY problems with it.

      Further, I can/have plugged my linux boxes straight in (it's on the list to firewall my network off with a linux box) with no problems.

      I don't know what problem you've had, but I've only had that one minor tech support problem.

  6. Comcast - Mac OS X by mcwop · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use Mac OS X. The software that Comcast has is incredibly buggy for Mac OS. I refused to install it. I just signed the docs for the cable guy (as if I even needed him to come do the installation in the first place).

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    1. Re:Comcast - Mac OS X by johnalex · · Score: 1

      Ditto here. I was using a Beige G3 running OS X when the cable guy showed up. He called me at work to find out how to set the network settings. I told him to just write down whatever settings he wanted to set and leave the paper there. After he hung up the phone, my wife overheard him say something about "now that's a true geek." Apparently he didn't get to deal with many people that knew much about computers.

      Actually, I didn't have to set anything. The Ethernet port was already set to use DHCP, so I plugged in a DNS server and BAM! Instant online!

      The great thing about the cable guy was that he moved my cable connection to another wall for me. Saved me a lot of trouble.

      I'm running an eMac on the connection now, so even if the cable guy had installed anything on the G3, it's history anyway.

      --
      JA
      http://www.johnalex.org/
    2. Re:Comcast - Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he said to you
      "now that's a true geek."

      And he said to your wife
      "now that's some good ass"

    3. Re:Comcast - Mac OS X by ruzel · · Score: 2, Troll


      When the Comcast guys came over to my place to install the cable, there happened to be two of them -- one of them in training. The guy saw my TiBook and turning to the trainee said, "These are nice. With these kind, you just have to plug the modem in and plug it into the computer."
      Trainee: "That's it?"
      Cable Guy: "Yup. That's it."
      Macs are not only great for the install, but they're obscure enough that there isn't any crappy marketroid software written for them!
      </typical macintosh rant>
      _________________

  7. Small Claims Court? by TheBillGates · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if you could take them to small claims court to compensate you for the time you spent uninstalling the program?

    Sure, it wouldn't amount to much money, but taking them to court would get their attention that people don't want that spyware stuff on their machines.

    The nerve they have to install that spyware and not have the decency to even let their customer know. This is a severe abuse of your privacy.

    1. Re:Small Claims Court? by R.Caley · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I wonder if you could take them to small claims court to compensate you for the time you spent uninstalling the program?

      More significantly, isn't him clicking through the end user agreements a forgery of your agreement?

      On a practical level, I agree with someone above: have a sacrificial machine. I built a machine from my parts boxes for them to mess up. After all, all they want is a windows control panel to poke at, that it is on a P100 with almost no disk space and a slightly dodgy power supply doesn't matter.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    2. Re:Small Claims Court? by B1 · · Score: 1

      That could backfire though... The court system is clogged, so some judges take a dim view of lawsuits that are apparently filed based upon "the principle of the thing" rather than real actual damages.

      Other judges take a dim view of those who would use the court system as a solution of first resort, rather than trying to resolve things out of court.

      Your first step should be to figure out what the actual damages are If add/remove programs can do it in mere minutes, forget the court date and send a nasty letter. On the other hand, if the only way to remove the software is to nuke and reload your PC, wiping out all data in the process, you might have more of a case. Maybe...

    3. Re:Small Claims Court? by ronaldcromwell · · Score: 1

      Riiiiiiight. Sue them for the 10 seconds it takes to click Uninstall in Add/Remove Programs. Don't kid yourself, geek time isn't worth THAT much.

    4. Re:Small Claims Court? by sqlrob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How do you know it will uninstall with that option?

      There are several programs (aka Gator) that don't

    5. Re:Small Claims Court? by Angram · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry, bub, but I'm a trained Small Claims Court Counsellor. You can't sue for emotional, time, or any other non-monetary kind of cost. If it can't be printed on a recipt, you can't sue. You can sue for time if it was part of an arrangement (i.e. plumber not getting paid for the job), but not for your time spent fixing this stuff. Unless he broke the machine and you had to have it serviced or replaced, there's nothing small claims court can do.

      --

      GL
    6. Re:Small Claims Court? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take them to small claims court, and they'll terminate your account instantly. You won't get back your sign-on fee either.

    7. Re:Small Claims Court? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So hire someone else to uninstall it (and perform a security analysis) and have them give you a receipt. Of course, you should only do this if you didn't sign a contract with Comcast allowing them to install the software.

    8. Re:Small Claims Court? by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

      And right after that, you can sue the small claims court for being too far from your house!

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    9. Re:Small Claims Court? by docwhat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So if I'm a professional and I charge $100/hour and it takes me 3 hours to do the work, I can't take them to court?

      But, if I hire out my friend to do the work at $100/hour then I can?

      Seems weird, since if I'm a pro, and I end up doing "professional" work because someone messing something up....

      I mean, if someone smashes into my house, and I'm a contractor and I fix it, I couldn't take them to small claims for the work I did?

      Ciao!

      --
      The Doctor What (KF6VNC)
    10. Re:Small Claims Court? by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      "Thank you for using PC-Geeks-For-Rent OS reinstallation service. Two hours for a reinstallation and data migration, at $100 per hour is $200 total."

    11. Re:Small Claims Court? by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 2

      More significantly, isn't him clicking through the end user agreements a forgery of your agreement?

      100% odds that the EULA that you do sign with the cable company gives them a limited power of attorney to "pass on" your assent for the license of any software they want to foist on you.

      Whether that would actually stand up in court is anyone's guess.

      --

      News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    12. Re:Small Claims Court? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You DO sign a document allowing software to be installed on your machine.

      Don't know how you can take anyone to court without this document surfacing.

    13. Re:Small Claims Court? by Traicovn · · Score: 1

      You are correct. Read the fine print on that contract that you sign and you may find that you have actually agreed to have the cable company install any software that may be necessary for your computer to access their network. It's most likely a really really lose contract giving them quite a few rights. It may even be something that you didn't actually sign but that refferenced another document. They are very very sneaky about stuff like that.

      --

      [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
      {Traicovn}
    14. Re:Small Claims Court? by ObliviousOne · · Score: 1

      You may want to check the contract you signed (the receipt). In NY we have some small print about entering binding arbitration.

    15. Re:Small Claims Court? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      So if I'm a professional and I charge $100/hour and it takes me 3 hours to do the work, I can't take them to court?

      But, if I hire out my friend to do the work at $100/hour then I can?


      Courts are a funny beast. If you're a professional and your time is worth $100/hour, guess how much you get paid if you have to report for jury duty? $15/day, maybe. I've never understood that. The judge and the lawyers get far more than $15/day but the jury (who everyone says has the most important job of anyone in the court room) gets $15/day. Don't want to work for $15/day? Tough. Work for the $15/day or go to jail.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    16. Re:Small Claims Court? by DDX_2002 · · Score: 1
      Good thought, but no, or at least, not necessarily.

      You're a trained Small Claims Court Counsellor (whatever that is) in one jurisdiction, but the universal feature of small claims courts is that they're inferior courts without inherent jurisdiction - this means they have exactly the powers given to them by statute, no more no less. So, YMMV depending on your jurisdiction. For example, where I am the Small Claims Court has jurisdiction over any matter up to a monetary limit of $10K except for libel, anything requiring inherent jurisdiction, and real property issues and anything else requiring equitable jurisdiction (will construction, probate, rectification, injunctions, etc.)

      Time, emotional disturbance, these are all part of general damages. Our small claims court can hear tort claims and award general damages - in fact, it does it all the time for minor MVA cases. It may be that your small claims court can't award general damages, but that's a silly system. Even if limited to contract, general damages can be and are awarded in contract cases. If for some reason the court is limited to actions in debt, then you'd be prevented from obtaining damages.

      --
      MHO. YMMV. Any resemblance between this post and real persons, or reality in general, was accidental.
    17. Re:Small Claims Court? by DDX_2002 · · Score: 1
      Don't want to work for $15/day? Tough. Work for the $15/day or go to jail.

      Exactly - your attendance is required as part of your civic duty. You're not an employee, you're a citizen: you pay taxes, register for the draft, and occasionally have to leave work for a day to sit on a jury. In return, you get the protection of the constitution and bill of rights, state constitution, citizenship, the US Armed Forces, state militias and local police covering your back. In Canada, you get the above in Canadian form, plus socialized health care.

      You actually owe them, is the basic theory, so you only get paid anything so you can cover the bus ride to and from and buy yourself lunch. As you mentioned, they can jail you for not showing up - the conduct money is a courtesy and simply designed to make sure you can afford to travel to the courthouse.

      --
      MHO. YMMV. Any resemblance between this post and real persons, or reality in general, was accidental.
    18. Re:Small Claims Court? by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      First time I've seen a person say, "I'm not a TSCCC".

    19. Re:Small Claims Court? by karlm · · Score: 2
      Hmm.. you intentionallylet them play with a computer with a dodgey power supply? if I were truly evil... which I am from time to time... I'd be tempted to put a timed water dipensation device in the bottom of the case, with the restart button on the case rewired to the timer...

      Install droid shows up... hit rest button before answering the door. 15 minutes into the install, water starts leaking rapidly out the bottom of your computer. "Oh, don't worry, it does that from time to time." 2 minutes later a firecracker goes off inside the case. "Yeah.. that happens about once a week. My brother thinks I need to reinstall windows."

      Too bad thos installation guys are just underappreciated drones, or I'd have a lot of fun.

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
    20. Re:Small Claims Court? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Exactly - your attendance is required as part of your civic duty. You're not an employee, you're a citizen: you pay taxes, register for the draft, and occasionally have to leave work for a day to sit on a jury. In return, you get the protection of the constitution and bill of rights, state constitution, citizenship, the US Armed Forces, state militias and local police covering your back. In Canada, you get the above in Canadian form, plus socialized health care.

      Oddly enough, I was under the impression that was what I pay taxes for.

      You actually owe them, is the basic theory,

      Indeed.

      Well, I suppose we could also cover the inequity (in my opinion) of requiring people to pay large dollars to defend themselves in court when, if the charges turn out to be unfounded ("Not Guilty") the accused person is still out his assets. If the accused had to sell his house, car, and so on to pay his defence bill, then is found not guilty, where is the justice in that? Prosecutors, judges and everyone EXCEPT the defence are paid by the state and nobody is "out" personally if the prosecution loses its case except for the poor sap who got hauled into court. And no, "You are entitled to a lawyer, here is a third-rate ambulance chaser who will advise you to plead guilty and sleep through the trial if you refuse" isn't the answer.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  8. Nothing. by krugdm · · Score: 4, Informative

    Roadrunner let me pick up a self install kit, so no tech ever came to my house.

    And no software needed to be installed anyway. Screwed the cable line into the modem, turned it on, attached it to the Linksys router, turned it on, attached that to the LAN port on my Mac, turned that on, and presto! A working internet connection!

    1. Re:Nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot step 5: if the router is also your firewall, change the default pw and ip.

    2. Re:Nothing. by Skirwan · · Score: 5, Funny
      Screwed the cable line into the modem, turned it on, attached it to the Linksys router, turned it on, attached that to the LAN port on my Mac, turned that on, and presto! A working internet connection!
      Step three... There's no step three. There's no step three!

      :)

      --
      Damn the Emperor!
    3. Re:Nothing. by Hard_Code · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually I wasn't aware of that "self-install" was a seperate option, so two guys came by and unpacked and plugged in the cable modem. Then one guy hunted around a bit trying to test if the connection was working until I realized that I had the DHCP Client service turned off, at which point I turned it on, and then explained to him, after he asked, what I had just done. So I guess "props" to Road Runner (although I'm not sure I feel good about giving "props" to anything related to the AOL/TimeWarner/MechaGodzilla conglomerate).

      I think these guys get commission on the number of installations they do in a day, so they are glad to get out the door as soon as they can.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    4. Re:Nothing. by Associate · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Step 3: Profit!

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    5. Re:Nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: This is funny for people who have seen Mac quick install docs.

    6. Re:Nothing. by alatesystems · · Score: 1

      And when I tried to connect it, it went AAHARRRGHHHHHHHHH. So I saved Christmas. But then their software made my computer go boo beep de boop deep, and then my paper was gone. So I had to write it all over, and it wasn't as good.

      My name is Chris, and I didn't install roadrunner software on a mac.

    7. Re:Nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, usually there are "promotions" that the ISPs (especially cable) run.

      I am relocating to an ATTBI market. I used to work for them, they suck, I don't have a choice, anyway.

      They usually have several months at a reduced rate and a free premium install. In this case I got 1 free month and a free basic install (what I wanted anyway).

      A premium install means that the tech comes to the house, installs the modem and software and makes sure you get online (they don't always do that, but that's the way it SHOULD work). A basic install is a self-install kit. The tech comes to the house, makes sure you have block-sync, gives you the install CD, and leaves.

      w/ATTBI you either a) must use Windows to get the install CD to work, or b) call tech support and get the SAS registration instructions to manually register.

      You have to set proxies in your browser, goto a semi-cryptic URL (depending on your area in the country and whether you were recently converted from AT&T Roadrunner), register your account, remove the proxies, release/renew or restart.

      So w/ATTBI it is better to suffer w/the premium install and the crap on the computer than having to call the shitty tech support and get the SAS URL.

      My name has been changed to protect me from more shitty connections ;-)

    8. Re:Nothing. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      I think these guys get commission on the number of installations they do in a day, so they are glad to get out the door as soon as they can.

      Most of the cable techs/installers I've talked to have a set number of installs/support calls they go out on each day, and, of course, those notorious time windows in which they have to be done. If they get to a job early or on time and get out of there quickly, they don't have to do anything until the next window is open, or they can just show up early for that job. If one job runs long, they either show up at the next place later in their window, or end up working late (if it was their last install). It's a pretty good deal for people that know what they're doing if they can stand the pay (which isn't as bad in most cases as most people think), as you can usually get most of the jobs done fairly quickly unless there's an actual problem with either the cable in the house or a problem with the node itself. I know that when they first came to install a cable modem in my parents' house a few years ago it just happened to coincide with a problem with that node which took down the whole 2 houses (one guy down the street and my parents) that had cable modems at the time. Those installers had a very long nite trying to figure out what was wrong (eventually it came up and worked until about 20 minutes after they left), and the modem didn't work for more than an hour a day for 2 weeks. Thankfully, they credited half of the month's modem service on the bill.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    9. Re:Nothing. by Pentagon13 · · Score: 1

      That's about what happened with me. The cable guy came to activate my connection and run the wire from another room for me. After giving me the box of stuff, he left. By the time the tech guy arrived to set things up, I already had everything connected and working fine, save for the addresses of roadrunner's news and pop3 servers. I didn't want the tech guy messing with anything or installing software, but he did want to verify that my connection was working. Apparently the active web browser, irc session, instant messenger conversation, and ftp connections weren't enough proof of a working connection so he decided to do "ipconfig /release" from the console, which triggered several of the programs to choke and spit up error messages. My only response was something along the line of "uh, I told you it was working... can you leave now so I can fix it?" No major harm done though, he was just doing his job, which I understand. Since I had been distracted I forgot to ask what the news and pop3 servers were though, which defeated the real use of even opening the door for him.

    10. Re:Nothing. by prelelat · · Score: 1

      Yeah I was pretty pissed off about my DSL hookup. The one guy came over and basicly pluged in the DSL modem and turned it on. This guy said that he would't even touch the computer and that some other guy was going to be over. Though when he told me this he gave a little hint that I could probably do it myself and save some time in calling the guy. So I set it up and browsed the internet for awhile and then the other guy called me. Told me he was comming over and never gave me a chance to tell him it was okay I had it running. Calls me again and says the same thing(that was a little weird). and then he shows up.

      I tell him the internet is ready, he sets up my email uses my bathroom and takes off.

      I was lucky he had a cd and shit all ready to install but when it was already hooked up and running he just didn't care.

      The thing that pissed me off is that it took them over a month to get over here and set up the internet and then when they did get here I basicly installed it myself. If I could have done the self-install I would have had the internet a month before I had got it.

    11. Re:Nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a similar situation. I met the service guy at the door, told him I wanted to do a self-install. After a couple of basic questions from him so he felt comfortable I had half a clue, he gave me the stuff, plus a couple of *really* long coax cables and a line splitter. In return, I signed off on a 45-minute install, so he could grab a long lunch. :)

    12. Re:Nothing. by gasgesgos · · Score: 1

      Roadrunner is so easy to work with! they want to install PPPoE crap on your system in their self install disk, but it all runs off of dhcp, or in my case, i was given an IP one day, so i changed my settings to specifically use that IP from then on. i've NEVER had a problem and i've got one consistent IP address. the best thing is, roadrunner doesn't seem to care at all...

  9. I did cable modem installs by cybergeak · · Score: 3, Informative

    And if you really don't want something done, assure the installer you will sign off on whatever, so long as he does what you ask.

    All we care about is your autograph, if your happy and are willing to sign, im sure he wont have a problem.

    alex

  10. It's all about the self-install by mhoover · · Score: 1

    My local cable company will send out a self install kit, so you don't even need the moron cable tech. If you really want to have fun, put Linux on your machine, and watch them fumble around trying to figure it out!

    --
    The dingo ate my sig.
    1. Re:It's all about the self-install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or tell them you just want cable for your fridge cos it's running low on milk and needs to place an order.

    2. Re:It's all about the self-install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to have fun, put Linux on your machine, and watch them fumble around trying to figure it out!

      Say, that sounds like an hilariously great time!

      Aren't you the clever rascal!

  11. was he wearing a suit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did he believe in what he was selling you? or was he just out for his paycheck.

    did IT come with an m$ poor sport payper hostage/ransom scam liesense.

    you must NOT have agreed to the eulas, if he was clicking your mouse?

  12. Mine didn't install anything, but by z_gringo · · Score: 4, Informative


    He stood me up the first time, then when he did arrive, he told me that I couldn't have a dedicated IP, despite them having promised me that I could have one. He did however configure my machine to use the cable company's proxy server, and use DHCP, etc... After he was done, I just reconfigured it and hard set the IP address. I haven't had a problem in the past couple of years. Except for when my machine was off for a couple of days, and I had to re-configure for DHCP,and "steal" another address, as my old one wasn't available any more...

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    1. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by puto · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just wondering one thing. What is the 'hard set" ip thing you did? If you are on a network and you are under a DHCP scope(range) then you can't assign yourself a permanent IP. Unless you have access and control to the actual equipment of your ISP.

      Now if your isp sets its leases to change IP's ONLY when your broadband connection drops or your pc powers down, then you can have the appearance of having a static ip. But your ip was not static because when you rebooted you were assigned another one.

      So what you have done is used DHCP to get a DHCP assigned IP address. Then changed YOUR configuration to see it as static. This is still DHCP. It was assigned from a lease. You didn't assign it to yourself, and anyway as long as that box is on it would have used that IP until you shut down or they decided to yank it. Changing your nic config to show a fixed ip that you got from a DHCP server is not setting a fixed IP. Cause even you said it changed when the machine went down.

      Most broadband ISPS change leases when the connection drops. Just like dial up. OR assign it five days. Depends on who is running the shop. My Cox cable will keep the same ip for months unless I shut the box off, then it changes.

      Just my 2 cents.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    2. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by z_gringo · · Score: 2

      Correct..

      Just get DHCP to assign one, and then set it as a static IP. You are correct that they could decide to yank it most any time, but most ISP's don't do that. Additionally, depending on the DHCP server, most DHCP scopes won't assign an IP that is already in use even if it is within th scope and not assigned by the server, so you are pretty safe. Obviosly, this isn't something you would want to do with a production server, but for home use it works ok, as long as you recognise that they could shut you down if they decide to. I've done this with two different providers, and have had no real problems.

      Regards,

      --
      -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    3. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Just wondering one thing. What is the 'hard set" ip thing you did? If you are on a network and you are under a DHCP scope(range) then you can't assign yourself a permanent IP. Unless you have access and control to the actual equipment of your ISP.

      So far I've found that most cable companies don't change your IP unless you drop connection of the cable modem itself for a couple of days, and I've been on Cox cable (in 2 different areas) for about 6 years (on both Cox@Home and Cox whatever they call it now). Of course, now I've got the cable modem hooked up to a cable/dsl router, which keeps the IP for itself, and I don't really bother with the static IP because it doesn't make a huge difference, and even if you set a static IP you'll have to get a new one every time the network drops out and tries to give you a new one. From the time that I first signed up, I had the same IP address for 2 years. Since the change over from @Home, though, I've had a lot more problems with the network randomly dropping off and changing IPs, so I've left it on DHCP and let it do it's thing. It means I have to actually look up my IP to do direct-connect gaming and ftp, but otherwise it's not a big deal.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    4. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Just get DHCP to assign one, and then set it as a static IP

      Don't you get it? This accomplishes nothing over leaving it DHCP, except you get cut off when the DHCP server decides to reassign you, and you possibly interfere with the new rightful user of your old address. Your computer thinking the address is static is meaningless.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by innate · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you're still pingable as that is how a lot of DHCP servers test for an address in use.

      --
      No, I don't want to explore the Recycle Bin.
    6. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "hard set" your IP? "Steal" another IP? Wow.. ignorance runs rampant..

    7. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by Koatdus · · Score: 1
      This is what happens to me. I have a linux firewall attached to the DSL modem. Since the only time it goes down is when we loose power my IP almost never changes. I also have a little perl script that checks my IP once in a while and keeps me up to date with dyndns.


      I heartily recommend dyndns by the way. I have set up a couple of friends with linux firewalls and dyndns so I can ssh into their firewall whenever I want. This makes it really easy to keep their machines up to date and gives them the warm fuzzies when I grep through /var/log/messages and email them a few port scan attempts.


      The DSL installer didn't do anything at all to my PC. He showed up, saw that I was running linux and sat around an BS's with me about computers for a while. He also runs Linux. He then gave me a sheet of paper with dns info, a 3 com ethernet card , and a cd with IE and some other junk on it. (I mounted the CD just to see what was on it.)

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
    8. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      despite them having promised me that I could have one.

      I've had more than one company try to do something like this to me (the notably recent one was Charter cable and their supposed HDTV support). I make it very painful for them by bringing it up mid-way through the installation. If they lied to you in order to get a sales guy in the door, and you haven't signed anything yet, you have every right to kick the guy out at that point with no compensation for them. The only verbal contract made involved their lie, so the contract is void. Hopefully the installer will get pissed and that will bubble up through his organization.

    9. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by Deosyne · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what's funnier: that z_gringo thought that setting a DHCP assigned address as a static IP was a good idea in the first place, or that he still thought it was a good idea even after puto explained how pointless that it was in great detail. :) Being a geek is great and all, but there is such a thing as getting carried away. ;)

    10. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by Yablo · · Score: 1

      for a mindless linux-router/firewall setup, try ipcop. it takes about 15 minutes to configure, and lets you do everything from dyndns updater, DMZ pinholes, detailed logging, traffic graphs, and other goodies.

    11. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by loteck · · Score: 1
      (I mounted the CD just to see what was on it.)

      I see this a lot..

      You crazy linux people must really like your CDs...

      I just hope you never want to see whats on your dog.

    12. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by adolf · · Score: 2

      Obviously, it "works ok." But when it doesn't work, you'll be without connectivity for appearently unknown reasons until you lease and use a new IP.

      Isn't it easier to just leave dhcpd running, automatically grabbing a new address for that once-in-a-blue-moon occasion when they need to assign a different one for you to use?

      I set up dhcpd on my FreeBSD router several providers ago, and haven't had to touch it again since.

      Back on topic: When the cable guy showed up here this past summer to install RoadRunner, the whole thing went pretty quick. It consisted of me setting the modem on the shelf and plugging it in, while he made a couple of RG-6 patch cords and put a splitter in-line with the TV. A couple of taps to kick dhcpd in the ass, and I was online.

      He seemed pleased that he got to take lunch early, and I still have no idea what software is on the CD that came with the modem.

  13. Nothing by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Just give me the network info. I'll do it. You have no business touching my machine"

    "but that's what my instructions say to do."

    "are you bonded?"

    "Whats that?"

    "It means are you insured in case I have to sue you personally for screwing something up"

    "oh.... Here's the info."

    Besides, I connect through a router. What possible good would THEIR software do me?

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    1. Re:Nothing by Sancho · · Score: 2

      An excellent response.

      I'd be interested to know more about this particular situation, too. Did the customer sign an agreement saying they'd allow this software to be installed? If not, the cable company itself could be liable for damages, including "loss of privacy", etc.

      I still think the best solution is to have a Linux machine there during the install. Or if you don't want to see frustration on the installer's face, just a spare PC or maybe a VMWare session in fullscreen.

    2. Re:Nothing by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      At the time, they weren't providing much apart from a standard service agreement regarding the hardware (cable modem). The software was apparently optional anyhow, for supports benefit, but I wasn't too interested in having an installer messing with my machine.

      The machine in question was a throw away install (my real machine is no-where near the cable connection), but I was just as happy not to have to blow it away. My experience (in discussing with others) the use of a Linux machine in the capacity you describe is that if the software is "required", an installer will simply leave, telling you that only Windows is supported. Another case for the self install kit (not available when I got hooked up, although it is now).

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    3. Re:Nothing by looseBits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tried that with AT&T and they said "Oh a router, huh? Well we need to charge you for extra computers on the connection." I checked their FAQ and he won, they do charge for extra computers on the connection so after he left, I removedd all of the crap and hooked up my router. Every call to tech support I make when it's down, I just fake my way though the "Okay, type winipcfg" crap (I know it's not on my end, if it were, I would have fixed it myself).

      --
      Lord, bless my users that they may stop being such fucking idiots!!
    4. Re:Nothing by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From what I understand, Roadrunner isn't doing that (charging for multiple PCs) yet. I refer to it as a firewall when I have to interact with them.

      I was originally going to get DSL, but I am (was, I'm told its improved) too far from the CO to get ADSL. At the time they offered me SDSL through a contractor, but the contractor wanted to charge business rates, and claimed to be able to "check" for routers. I told them to get stuffed, since cable was available.

      Now the contractor (can't remember who they were, but they were a major DSL player) is out of business, and Sprint keeps calling asking me to sign up for their "improved" service.

      If RR doesn't do something about the customer at 65.35.62.22 thats spewing port scans and probing for Netbus, et al, I'll have to take a look at Sprint. The scanner is no real threat, but since I've notified security several times and the same address is scanning more and more frequently, I'm losing what little confidence I had in them... Service has been rock solid though.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    5. Re:Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are some kind of fucken computer genius.

    6. Re:Nothing by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

      From what I understand, Roadrunner isn't doing that (charging for multiple PCs) yet.

      I had RR in Columbus off and on for two years back in 99/2000. While they appear to have changed their practices, they originally did not permit splitting a conenction. Instead they tried to sell you additional IP addresses at $10 a pop. Later, if you wanted to do NAT, they sold home networking kits that were enormously over priced and charged you some kind of generic extra computers premium.

      At one point, they even started sending out threatening emails. They claimed that NAT users were stealing the bandwidth of honest users. They also made a few threats about being able to detect the use of NAT, termination of service, unlimitted rice pudding and so on.

      I think they've mellowed out a little now. These days so many people have more than one computer that it is more difficult to get away with lies about stealing bandwidth and such. Of course, even back then, we never had a single problem with our unauthorized NAT.

    7. Re:Nothing by Quikah · · Score: 1

      Really? I don't get charged extra for a router on AT&T, just gave them the MAC and they set it up, no questions asked. Also the installer didn't install anything on my system.

      --
      Q.
    8. Re:Nothing by looseBits · · Score: 1
      If you look at the AT&T Acceptable Use Policy, on section 10 it says
      Prohibited uses include, but are not limited to, using the AT&T Broadband Equipment (as defined in the Subscriber Agreement) or the Service to... provide the ability to connect multiple computers behind the cable modem to set up a LAN (Local Area Network) unless it is done with AT&T Broadband approved equipment. For additional information on supported equipment refer to: http://help.broadband.att.com/faq.jsp?content_id=1 748&category_id=50.
      --
      Lord, bless my users that they may stop being such fucking idiots!!
    9. Re:Nothing by Doppler00 · · Score: 2

      I think their use policy is a bit vague though. How do you define a LAN? What if I'm the only person using 10 different applications on 10 different computers? Would this be any different from me using ten different applications on one computer? No, it would use the same bandwidth and ATT probably couldn't tell the difference between the connections. I think it's fair enough to charge for additional IP addresses because there are certain advantages to having seperate addresses.

    10. Re:Nothing by Quikah · · Score: 1

      I have been using my Linksys router for 8 months now to connect 2 computers on AT&T broadband in SoCal with no additional charges.

      The installer and support person I gave the router's MAC to did not mention anything about it being against the AUP.

      Beats me.

      --
      Q.
    11. Re:Nothing by looseBits · · Score: 1

      Well, it seems that AT&T doesn't usually enforce that policy but my installer did (perhaps he was just a asshole).

      --
      Lord, bless my users that they may stop being such fucking idiots!!
  14. Didn't have this problem by TheRealFixer · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Time Warner/RoadRunner guy simply came in, installed a new NIC, installed the cable modem, set up the new email settings in Outlook, and changed the IE homepage to their portal. I scoured the system when I got home from work (my wife was the only one here when he did the install) and was quite relieved that he didn't install any software.

    1. Re:Didn't have this problem by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      You have IE and Outlook... The installer probably took one look for something to screwup, and took pity on you. Or maybe he just couldn't think of any way to make it worse. I know that here (Vancouver Canada) installer for cable internet service is a VERY enty level job.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    2. Re:Didn't have this problem by fred911 · · Score: 1

      "set up the new email settings in Outlook"

      They'll email ya anything else they want to install. Outlook will automaticly install it for
      ya...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  15. Uninstall it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uninstall it and don't worry about what it does. There're several reasons there's still a market for dialup, and this is one of them. The software is obviously Spyware, and I wouldn't be suprised if Adaware gets rid of it.

  16. Reinstall the software and read EULAs by goldspider · · Score: 2, Informative

    It shouldn't be that hard, really. If there are anything in those EULAs you object to or don't feel comfortable with, cancel the service.

    In that case, I hope your father didn't agree to some sort of contract.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  17. Add/Remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just delete the crap and move on. Christ, why all the freaking hand wringing over something as simple as this non-issue - after all, you yourself said that the software was non-essential to the functionality of the cable modem!

  18. At home by Apreche · · Score: 2

    my parents have DSL from the phone company. What they do is plug it in, then give you a CD and tell you to install it yourself. If you aren't careful it does some pretty crazy stuff. Your computer will turn into a giant ad for the phone company if you don't play it smart. There is one program you need to install though, its the one that lets you log into the DSL network. I don't know if it does underhanded things, and I forget what it's called. But the DSL is crazy fast, so I'm not going to complain.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:At home by karlmiller · · Score: 1

      Actually DSL service with the phone company (a.k.a. Verizon) is a lot less problematic than cable modem service in my area (Maryland). The cable company (Comcast) does not support or allow routers on their network according to their terms of service. However, Verizon has no problems with routers and will even support it if you buy one from them. What's more, you don't even need ot install any software as long as you have a router that support PPPoE. I received the self-install kit that said, "This CD has Windows and Mac software." So I simply called the support line saying I use Linux and can't install their software, but still need an account with which to login for PPPoE. The customer service rep was so helpful, he sasid just a sec, transfered me to an account guy who said "Your username is ... and you password is ...." And it was set. No issues, software EULAs or anything else I wouldn't like. Just connectivity. I'm not even a big fan of Verizon, but they at least did something right.

    2. Re:At home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The customer service rep was so helpful, he sasid just a sec, transfered me to an account guy who said "Your username is ... and you password is ...."

      Haven't you seen the AOL ad? "We never ask for your personal information...."

    3. Re:At home by waveclaw · · Score: 1
      my parents have DSL from the phone company.


      I've got DSL from the phone company. The sales people on the phone insisted on getting my machine info down to the last minutae (me:'ok, wait a minute, I gotta reboot to windows here..' sales-droid:'huh?') but the installer was clued in.


      When he arrived and noticed my huge pile'o'computer stuff was VERY far from the nearest jack (he'd need MUCH longer cables to install the DSL modem) I hit him up with using my little router box and letting me string cat-5 all around my apartment. One small home network later and all my computers are talking to the net fine - EULA, Spyware, and Adware free.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    4. Re:At home by nathanroberts · · Score: 1
      my parents have DSL from the phone company. What they do is plug it in, then give you a CD and tell you to install it yourself. If you aren't careful it does some pretty crazy stuff. Your computer will turn into a giant ad for the phone company if you don't play it smart.
      I ran into a similar problem cleaning out a friend's computer after she installed Earthlink's software. It came with earthlink's `own` browser, and a bunch of other crap that simply slowed the system down. (It was a Pentium 133 (One I loaned to her (It was the only one I had to spare)))

      Apparently another friend helped her install it, and apparently ran the 'install' program off the root of the CD, which installed it all. I uninstalled all the Earthlink software, and reinstalled WinPOET, which thankfully had a standalone installer on the CD (though hidden in a folder with an obscure name)

    5. Re:At home by xtremex · · Score: 1

      PPPoE..that's what Verizon has...but screw Verizon...you can use a local DSL provider that doesnt use PPPOE

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    6. Re:At home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are in maryland and dont use starpower?

      WHY? starpower is awesome :)

    7. Re:At home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KarlMiller,

      Wow, my experience here in montgomery county, MD,
      by Verizon was extremely different. They refused
      to release the username/password even with multiple
      phone calls. Had to install the crap, did my best
      to uninstall...more power to you!

    8. Re:At home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My DSL Just gave me pppoe software and nic card drivers and on there web thay say for Win xp just use The pppoe in win xp.

  19. They tried. by MKalus · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I moved lately I had a guy come out as they needed to "configure my pc".

    I showed him to my Linux firewall, he was surprised about the prompt but figured it was just DOS (ha).

    Put in the cd, realised it was not DOS, took the CD out, turned to me and said: "Well, I guess you know what you're doing." And left.

    Offically my Cable Provider (Rogers) is not supporting Linux / Unix but if you have a technical issue just bug the Second Line support and 99% of the time you get the Unix guy who answers your questions.

    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    1. Re:They tried. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the guy saw you knew what you were doing and didnt waste your time.

    2. Re:They tried. by slamb · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Offically my Cable Provider (Rogers) is not supporting Linux / Unix but if you have a technical issue just bug the Second Line support and 99% of the time you get the Unix guy who answers your questions.

      I've never even had to do that (MediaCom). When it was installed and when I've had problems with the service, they've told me they don't support Linux. I've just told that's fine and to tell me what they want done instead of how to accomplish it. They've been pretty good about that. I get instructions like "go to this URL to register your computer's MAC address with us" instead of "click on 'Start' in the lower left hand corner, ...".

    3. Re:They tried. by slide-rule · · Score: 2, Funny

      That gives me an idea: make a "D:" script that echos out a big series of cryptic warnings, errors, etc. about invalid path, DLL and/or VxD warnings, a few bells, and a half-complete panic message about the file system now being corrupt with enough sleep statements between the echo's to make it all "look good". Man... seeing a tech's face (or heck, even just family company) get all sweaty for thinking he just hosed someones system might make it worth it.

    4. Re:They tried. by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      How the heck do you reach second line support? There are a couple times I wish I could just call someone and ask "Is my modem showing up, or is there a service outage in my area" and get a straight answer from someone who knows what it means when I say "I don't have a supported e-mail client."

      Hell, I can't even get hired for first-line support!

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    5. Re:They tried. by Density_Altitude · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had the cable guy come to my house to install the NIC/junkware too. When he arrived, I shut my linux firewall down, open the case, he gives me the network card that I put in and boot. Then he gives me his drivers floppy, asking me which OS I ran. I tell him I run linux and I don't need the drivers. The card is an old SMC 10mbit so I just compiled the ne2k-pci module, insmodded it and ifuped eth1 which I configured to use dhcp.
      The best part was the look on his face when he saw the internet connection working right away without rebooting. (At the time they were supporting only win9x machines)

      --
      delete free(system.gc);
    6. Re:They tried. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man are you lucky! I have found their support dismal. After seeing friends deal with this support even on approved OS's, I went with Sympatico DSL (Bell Canada/Ontario).

      When I phoned to activate my self-install, the first thing the tech said was probably a legal requirement ..."you understand we don't officially support your operating system" and I thought it would go downhill from there.

      WRONG: He proceeded to tell me that unofficially, here is a WEB PAGE DEDICATED to PPPoE/Linux and here is where the instructions are, yada yada, and here is the unsupported driver for download, or you can use your standard PPPoE if so equiped or we know Roaring Penguin v."XXX" works fine.

      WOW. Not only that, but it is significantly faster than all my poor friends Cable (across multiple regional infrastructures), and it *never* goes down. These guys have their act in gear!

    7. Re:They tried. by pamdirac · · Score: 1

      I've had service from ATT and from Charter. Neither one gave me too much of a hard time about using Linux, but the ATT crew was comical.

      I say crew, because they sent 2 guys. The hardware guy knew how to connect coax cable to a jack and how to plug in an RJ-45 connector. The software guy knew how to click 'Next' on the Internet Exploiter install.

      The software guy sat down at my "DOS" prompt and asked me to get back into Windows. So I typed 'startx' and watched him squirm for a few minutes. :)

      --
      John McNair
    8. Re:They tried. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do that with WinXP too, you brainless zealot.

    9. Re:They tried. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(At the time they were supporting only win9x machines)"

      Think about it you goddamn idiot.

    10. Re:They tried. by Density_Altitude · · Score: 1

      We have a 3MBit ADSL at the office here in Montreal. It's about 4-5 times faster upstream than my home Cable connection with Videotron, but it's slower downstream and goes down way more often. Last month, we've been down 3 times for more than 1 hour, one of which it took more than 24 hours to get the service back. But hey, it's part of our contract, we had to agree that this could happen (it's a cheap connection after all...)
      When we bought the connection last year I told the technical guy that I would be replacing the ISDN router we had with a linux firewallgateway. He told me I wouldn't have any problem doing my routing if I was running xinetd instead of inetd. WTF??
      At least they are becoming aware of non-Microsoftish operating systems but there's still a lot to learn!

      P.S.: for users of xDSL/Cable modems take a look at the linux QoS support and TC tutorials (look in the Advanced Routing HOWTO), it will make your broadband experiance mucho bettah!

      --
      delete free(system.gc);
    11. Re:They tried. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(Your mother fucks donkeys)"

      Think about it you fucking moron.

    12. Re:They tried. by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      I had a problem with PacHell (SBC). For some reason I couldn't auth. Because I use a Linksys, I ran a sanity check by calling the dialup. No joy.

      I called their tech support, and got someone who didn't freak out when I told them I was on a router. I told them I understood I wasn't a supported config, and explained that it was dialup as well as DSL (so the router wasn't at fault). She said that she really couldn't support me, but did what she could with that config (namely reset my PW).

      For some reason, my password entry got corrupted in their DB, and the password reset worked. I thanked her and went on my way.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    13. Re:They tried. by Mnemia · · Score: 2

      I always just lie. I've used Windows enough that I can imagine what they are trying to do in my head, so I just fake that I'm doing it while actually doing the equivalent in Linux. e.g. "Go to Start, click Run, type w-i-n-i-p-c-f-g, hit OK, select the Ethernet adaptor from the pulldown list, and read me the MAC address" == "type ifconfig in bash". Works pretty well and so far none of them have ever figured out that I wasn't using Windows.

    14. Re:They tried. by MajroMax · · Score: 2
      lie. I've used Windows enough that I can imagine what they are trying to do in my head, so I just fake that I'm doing it while actually doing the equivalent in Linux.

      I've been in a similar situation, right up until the point where they asked me exactly what the error message on their special PPPoE software said -- being unable to fake that [although the error was a generalized 'no connect', it obviously wasn't specific enough to fool them], I faked a catastrophic system crash and called back later after digging up a Windows system for the support.

      --
      "Evil company X is threatening to restrict our rights! Let's all get together to stop--OOOH! SHINEY!!!" -- AC
  20. interesting by tps12 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, as a very first step, I would recommend against posting this to Slashdot. Let me explain with a little thought experiment. Presumably you are trying to "get the word out" about the Evil Corporate Spyware installed by your cable provider. Suppose you were to succeed, and almost every cable customer were to remove said software from his or her PC. Their demographics database would start to be pretty thin, and suddenly they can no longer use that information to defray some of the costs of running a broadband outfit. Best case, you get a rate hike. Worst case, the cable company goes out of business, and you're back on dialup (which, if you wanted to vote with your wallet against this kind of practice to discourage it, you could have done anyway). A better course of action would be to quietly uninstall everything the cable guy installed and keep it all under your hat.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:interesting by Omnifarious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they can't stay in business honestly, they don't deserve to be in business.

      If they wish to collect demographic data on your purchases in return for a decrease in your bill, that's fine. But they should have a contract specificying how much that decrease will be, and exactly what the software will do. You can have it in your service contract all nice and above board, or choose NOT to have it and pay higher costs.

      Of course, since they're a monopoly, that will just lead to a $50/mo (or more) difference. But that's easier to point a finger at and complain bitterly about to your local regulator.

    2. Re:interesting by glh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the public has a right to know about this sort of activity and I am glad slashdot posted it. Granted, it generates a certain amount of FUD but that is to be expected (it is slashdot).

      Why should the cable companies need to start doing this sort of thing in order to make money? I'm sure there are better ways. How about offering decent service and some other products (such as spam filters) that we can pay additional for? Why do they have to be so sneaky? I feel sorry for the poor AOL converts that have no clue about what is being installed on their system- they are just innocent victims. They may not even know how to uninstall something- so they have no choice.

      This kind of behavior is unethical, especially if the customer doesn't know what is going on. If privacy or high speed connection were mutually exclusive, I would choose privacy and I think a good percentage of others would also. It's bad enough with all the other crap that seems to fill up your hard drive when you're on the internet, we don't need the ISP doing it as well.

    3. Re:interesting by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      I would recommend against posting this to Slashdot

      Somehow I don't think my mom will hear about evil cable companies from Slashdot...

    4. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear!! I totally agree with this post, just stick it to the lemmings!!!

    5. Re:interesting by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 2
      A better course of action would be to quietly uninstall everything the cable guy installed and keep it all under your hat.

      This is fine if you only care about yourself. If you care about others, you do spread the word out, because other people's privacy is at stake, and because this cable provider is doing something dirty to say the least. Know what ? Some people do care about other people. Thanks to {e}NOS and Cliff for the story.

    6. Re:interesting by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "suddenly they can no longer use that information to defray some of the costs of running a broadband outfit."

      First off, I notice you're assuming that they need this money to defray the cost of providing broadband. I suggest that any business using this model doesn't deserve to stay in business long.

      Secondly, you seem to be someone who thinks we should all be very happy with the "opt-out list" mentality because we're somehow "saving money." Businesses need to be taught that abusing and not respecting their customers is a Bad Thing and I for one wouldn't mind paying a little more for a business that actually gives a damn about me (but I have yet to be forced into that decision... seems some enterprising business is always there to provide to us somewhere). And I have the feeling that I'm not alone in feeling this way.

      "A better course of action would be to quietly uninstall everything the cable guy installed and keep it all under your hat."

      You're part of the problem, then, not the solution. I'm simply not going to just sit there and take this sort of abuse from anybody.

    7. Re:interesting by hosebee · · Score: 2, Funny
      Karma: I invented putting my Karma: in my sig.
      Yes, but I believe CmdrTaco holds the relevant patents. It's only a matter of time before you're PanIPed.
    8. Re:interesting by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Presumably you are trying to "get the word out" about the Evil Corporate Spyware installed by your cable provider. Suppose you were to succeed, and almost every cable customer were to remove said software from his or her PC. Their demographics database would start to be pretty thin, and suddenly they can no longer use that information to defray some of the costs of running a broadband outfit. Best case, you get a rate hike. Worst case, the cable company goes out of business..."

      Keep in mind that 99% of cable users don't read slashdot or tech forums in general. The posting here will only serve to inform those who can put the knowledge to good use and protect themselves. The resulting dent in the demographics databases as a result of this will be very small, and the cable companies probably will not bat an eye.

    9. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      golly you get the gravy train while others eat the grumbs eh? how would you like it if the roles were reversed? be grateful for what you know but if your not gonna help others... that`s why geeks get a bad rap. stop looking down at people and give`em a hand up. one more thought, just what are you gonna do when a can of beans is worth more than gold? don`t think it won`t happen? well if your so smart tell me it won`t happen and when it does, ( and it will) just ask yourself how did this guy know and i didn`t.

    10. Re:interesting by xScruffx · · Score: 1
      I feel sorry for the poor AOL converts that have no clue about what is being installed on their system- they are just innocent victims. They may not even know how to uninstall something- so they have no choice.


      How would they ever know it? Hell . . . if they're getting 56K speeds, then they're more-than-likely already dumfounded.

      xScruffx
    11. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Karma: I invented putting Karma: in my sig.
      You sir/madame, have the great distinction of knowing what is like to be the first lemming off the cliff.
  21. investigate your cable connection by one_who_uses_unix · · Score: 5, Interesting
    To understand exactly what is happening with your broadband connection follow these steps:

    1.Connect PC, cable modem and a second PC (everyone has one :) ) to a simple hub ($20).
    2.Run a network capture tool (tcpdump, snoop, ethereal, etc.) on the 2nd PC.
    3.Boot your broadband PC.
    4.Look at the traffic.

    You should be able to recognize the DHCP negotiations and see whether anything unusual is going on. Odds are, all it needs to do is negotiate for an address, everything else is probably frill.

    The next step is to install a 2nd NIC in the 2nd PC, load linux, connect the cable modem to that and the other NIC to your little LAN and use IP tables to set up a firewall and NAT.

    --
    KK4SFV
    1. Re:investigate your cable connection by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 2, Funny
      Um... okay. I think I got it.

      One question: my computer is the purple kind. Will that change anything?

      sorry, couldn't resist.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    2. Re:investigate your cable connection by earlydaysofsin · · Score: 1

      Why do you need a second PC for this ... ethereal runs just fine on Windows

    3. Re:investigate your cable connection by one_who_uses_unix · · Score: 1

      because you want to catch traffic at startup - as an alternative you could try to "restart" the connection by not powering up the cable modem until you were able to start an ethereal capture.

      I find it easier to follow the ath outlined above since I always have a few extra boxes laying around.

      --
      KK4SFV
  22. That's tough by ONOIML8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're going to play with their toys the you have to play by their rules. If their contract/TOS/whatever says you have to agree to have all that software and agree with the licensing to all in order to use their service, then I guess that's what you gotta do. But it's their system, their toys, so if you don't like it then don't play.

    Now the installer was wrong. Very wrong. If you're gonna play by the rules then you should have read EVERY word of EVERY EULA and made the determination for each one. Since those are legal documents you would want to read carefully, perhaps consult with your lawyer on a few points. You could tie up that installer for a VERY long time. But for him to indicate that you accepted.....well, you might want to consult with your lawyer now.

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    1. Re:That's tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe he agreed to it in the contract he signed, thus giving the installer permission to install every piece of software?

      Maybe he wasn't necessary for the EULA's of this Broadjump kit.

    2. Re:That's tough by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "you might want to consult with your lawyer now."

      Might be kinda interesting. It may leave you free to blatently and publicly violate the EULA on the software? "But I never agreed to anything. Sue the cable company!"

    3. Re:That's tough by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2

      Perhaps that is why the Cable Company hires contractors to do the installs.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  23. Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by phil+reed · · Score: 1

    In all probability, one of those forms you signed was an agreement that extended the license agreement to you. So, even though the cable guy was the one "agreeing" to the EULAs, he was doing it on your behalf.

    --

    ...phil
    "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    1. Re:Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Such an agreement would not be binding unless it included the texts of all the EULAs.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by phil+reed · · Score: 2
      Such an agreement would not be binding unless it included the texts of all the EULAs.


      Not really. There are lots of contracts that refer to other contracts and "incorporate" their terms "by refrence". Those other contracts have to be available to you as well, somehow. And they were in this case - the original submitter said that he saw them on the screen as the cable guy was clicking on them.


      I agree with the premise, however. It's a scummy business practice illustrated here, but it's not surprising.

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    3. Re:Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by mgblst · · Score: 2

      If you read this message, then you agree to hand over all worldly positions to the poster.

      Click Cancel if you are not prepared for this.

    4. Re:Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      > Not really. There are lots of contracts that
      > refer to other contracts and "incorporate" their
      > terms "by refrence".

      I don't believe that this works for a contract of adhesion.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      And even if it did, the contract you agreed to when you arranged to have the cable service installed would have to provide actual references for the included EULAs telling you where you could get copies. "Anything we feel like sticking on the install CD is hereby included by reference" won't work.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  24. Not a damn thing by Halo- · · Score: 4, Informative

    I suppose it depends on your provider, but to my knowledge, you shouldn't need a damn thing. Wanna test it easily?

    1) Borrow a laptop with an ethernet card, unplug the power from the cable modem (some of them will only give a DHCP address to one MAC address at a time, and need to "forget" what they have seen)

    2) Plug in the cable modem

    3) Attach the laptop

    Didja get an IP? If so, I'd say you can pretty safely whack the offending software. I seriously doubt it's needed. A lot of things (like a lot of those "connection sharing" firewall/router devices) would fail to work if it was.

    1. Re:Not a damn thing by erktrek · · Score: 1


      You could also try burning a linux bootable CD, something like Knoppix [www.knoppix.org] then boot up using the CD.

    2. Re:Not a damn thing by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      the ISP I used to work for did at one time require you to login. You could get an IP, but the ubr's wouldnt let you go anywhere until it had verified your account in their database. But when they started offering business class service they had to kill it since hardware firewalls couldnt authenticate themselves on the network

  25. Just like with drugs... by rocket_w · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...just say no. They do not need to install anything, I would tell the cable installer that if he/she has to install the software, then you do not want the service. Cable companies want your business more than they want to sell your info. This is another fine example of people infringing on your privacy without you knowing.

    --
    ----- "It's all fun and games 'til somebody puts an eye out, then it's just funny."
    1. Re:Just like with drugs... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2
      This is only true in aggregate. Companies, at least those of sufficient size, couldn't care less whether they have your business. Mine was adamant that they had to have my SSN, and were perfectly content to NOT have my business if I wouldn't divulge it. Only by trying to sign up repeatedly and declining to provide it did I eventually find someone who didn't care enough about corporate policy to refuse service. Some were even outraged that I didn't want to provide it. "Would you refuse to give your SSN to $TELCO?!?" Me: "Damn right, unless they're cutting my Social Insecurity checks in a few decades!" Bastards. Like it's so hard to create a unique customer ID. In fact, after getting service sans SSN, I found that they created a unique account number anyway .


      This is one good reason to patronize small businesses. You're a bigger chunk of their revenue stream, and there's a correspondingly larger chance that they want you, personally, to be happy, rather than just upping the magic "customer satisfaction" number.

    2. Re:Just like with drugs... by Casualposter · · Score: 1

      They can't require your SSN, as far as I know, because of a Federal Law against that sort of thing.

      Doesn't stop them from asking for it though.

      --
      Creative Spelling Copyright (2002). May use without Persimmons
    3. Re:Just like with drugs... by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      It would have been faster if you'd just threatened to report them. It is illegal to require an SSN except in certain instances. Your employer, your bank, in fact pretty much anything to do with your money, can get it...but the rest cannot require it, at least in the US. (And I doubt you'd have to worry about business outside the US requiring a SSN.)

      Of course, who is allowed to require it keeps growing, but utilities are not, as far as I know, included. (After all, it's not like they'd ever have to track you down...they presumable know where you live.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    4. Re:Just like with drugs... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      A specific cite would be appreciated. My understanding is that it was once illegal, but is no longer. Your recourse is limited to taking your business elsewhere. Let me know where to report them and I'd be happy to do it.

    5. Re:Just like with drugs... by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I honestly have no idea who to report them to, but I do know it i is illegal to require a SS number under many circumstances. The rules get continually laxer, which is probably the 'used to be illegal' you heard about, and now places like colleges and whatnot may be allowed to get them.

      However, utilities are certainly not included under the new lax rules, utilities actually have more restrictions about what information they can require, because they are usually monopolies, so even if normal businesses were allowed to require it, which they are not, utilities probably wouldn't anyway.

      But, no, it's a myth, normal businesses can't require SSNs. The rule of thumb is usually that anyone involved in money can, and the rest cannot. There are exceptions in both directions, but the default is still that J. Random Company cannot require it.

      As for reporting it...um...check out the FTC's web site and see if you can find something. ATTBI should be controlled by the FCC, but I don't think you'll be able to get any information from them, they don't really deal with the public.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  26. IANAL but... by reimero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I realize you and your family never agreed to the software, you did authorize the installation of the modem. At best, it's a very gray legal area. The ISP and software manufacturer can both claim the tech was acting as a duly authorized agent (which he was) and you can validly claim that this software was never mentioned as being necessary and that it was sprung on you without prior notice, which would undoubtedly have affected your decision to purchase.
    Unfortunately, he left with a valid signature, which legally means you have accepted the service as is, software and all. You may be able to remove the software, but at this point, all you can do is complain about it. But once you sign the sheet saying the work is done, you've essentially stated that the contract (or that portion thereof) has been fulfilled to your satisfaction. I know it's a hassle, but if you have serious misgivings about it, the proper procedure is to decline signature and say you never authorized this software installation, and allow the tech to remove the modem. Then deal with the sales department. If you paid by credit card, remember that you can put a hold on that payment until it is resolved to your satisfaction.

    --

    ----------

    Something clever
    1. Re:IANAL but... by WPIDalamar · · Score: 1

      Bull.

      When you sign the contract, you agree to the terms of the contract, not every single term that may have flashed accross your screen. If you don't get a chance to read them, then you can't be held to those terms.

      Even if the contract said something like "You agree to all the terms of the software too", unless it explicitly listed all the places where you can read those terms, it's a non-issue.

    2. Re:IANAL but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of times in the past when I have been required to sign something to get a service such as this, I added a sentence or 2 next to my signature. Something like:

      "I was not given the opportunity to read the EULA of any software installed on my machine."

      I would like to know if added text like this actually becomes part of the legal document once signed by me. Sometimes the other person is a little surprised that I want their signatures on my copy...

    3. Re:IANAL but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you realize that your subject is "I ANAL butt"?

  27. I got lucky. by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 2

    The guy who came by when I got Road Runner (they didn't have self-install at the time) used his Linux box as his firewall too, so no guff about installation software.

  28. .... that isn't really the biggest issue imo. by anal_assassin · · Score: 1

    there's things seriously wrong with the cable company installing stuff on peoples computers (without asking) that will monitor they're demographics and report information about them (perhaps without them even knowing). ....someone should be able to sue the.. [unwanted kids] for this.. sure them for all they got :P !!

    1. Re:.... that isn't really the biggest issue imo. by goldspider · · Score: 2

      "there's things seriously wrong with the cable company installing stuff on peoples computers (without asking)"

      IANAL but I believe that signing that paper that the technician brought is legally all the consent they need to do whatever they want regarding their service. But will say it was not right of the technician to click through those EULAs like that.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  29. Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Instead of trying to get a bunch of pizza faced geeks to do your work for you, why not do YOUR JOB, you know, the one you are being PAID to do???

    Lazy ass bastard

  30. As for AT&T Broadband by Bobartig · · Score: 2

    At least in my case, the guy didn't even _try_ to install anything. I was impressed that he even knew how to set up an iMac from the TCP/IP control panel (I've had horrid experience trying to convince broadband technical support to even talk to me if they know I have a mac). The only thing he tried to do was set the default homepage of IE to some broadband portal, and I was like "Uh, this is my girlfriend's machine, and you _really_ don't want to do that."

    Then when he left, I whipped out the router and got everybody else on-line ;)

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    1. Re:As for AT&T Broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a cable guy to come out not too long ago to upgrade our cable modem for free, and give us a free month of service, and a discounted 4 months (On ATTBI, surprisingly). We had a nice hour and a half, real friendly, talkative. He didn't even care that we have a home network. I expected him to freak because we forgot to hide the hub and stuff.

    2. Re:As for AT&T Broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >At least in my case, the guy didn't even _try_ to install anything.

      I got the self instlal option. First time it worked ok. I had to reinstall windows for some stupid reason. [ Some softare kept crashing, and I decided it was easier to reinstall everything from scratch, than try to fix the software. ]

      Lo and behold the broadband client crashes when I try to install it. I had thought that it was required for att broadband. I don't think it ever managed to correctly isntall. My firewall is configured to reject it, and most, if not all of the broadband addresses are in my hosts file as 127.0.0.1.

      I doubt broadjump is getting anything from me.
      [ All I have to do now, is get Linux installed on this box, and ditch win2k for good. ]

  31. My cable guy... by noz · · Score: 1

    My cable guy (on a slightly funny yet sad side-note) didn't have a PCMCIA network card and left my house happy having achieved his list of todos. I felt very empty waiting 3 days to get to shop for my own NIC to finish the job. The EULA was the least of my concern.

    On a more valid note, in Australia I do know that Optus Cable is a permanent connection and does not require any software whatsoever (and none is installed), while Telstra Cable requires softward because it is PPPoE and perhaps other non-standard things (for a very long time they did not use DOCSIS modems).

    1. Re:My cable guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, PPPoE is annoying, but not particularly evil.

      The telecoms love it because all their RADIUS setups are tied to their existing PPP configurations, and it's apparently a lot easier for them to dump something a Redback into a network than to learn how to manage the same level of everything with more 'standard' network-management tools. Companies that aren't already running massive dialup ISPs have less cruft to deal with, so they don't bother with it.

      Of course, whether they try to get you to install other crap along with the PPPoE client is another matter. Here in the US, I've got service from SBC (now SBCYahoo), and while they're a giant soul-sucking monopoly, at least I'm getting no bullshit from them. :)

    2. Re:My cable guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PPPoE requires software but it doesn't require their software. All you need is a user name and password to put into the router.

  32. What scares me just a little bit... by writermike · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... is how when you search for "Broadjump Client Foundation" in Google, the company's own homepage doesn't come up in the early listings.

    This says to me that either there are very few links to the company's homepage, or there is no company homepage.

    Heh. Conspiracy therories entered here. 10 cents.

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    1. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummmmm.... http://www.BroadJump.com

      They are a reputable company in Austin.

    2. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      .. Have you tried browsing to www.broadjump.com?
      From their website:

      Hardware makes broadband possible. BroadJump software makes it profitable. BroadJump solutions allow broadband service providers around the world to greatly reduce operating costs and seamlessly enable the delivery of revenue-generating content, applications, and services over existing broadband networks.

    3. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A reputable company that may give out nice kickbacks to the person in charge of ISP's.

    4. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by iapetus · · Score: 2

      What scares me just a little bit is that you didn't think to try http://www.broadjump.com/. ;)

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    5. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by adlai · · Score: 3, Funny
      Maybe they're being blocked by the French authorities?

      Damn French. :)

    6. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by writermike · · Score: 2

      Heh.

      I am pretty scared I didn't try that. :-D

      Sorry. Monday morning.

      --
      If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    7. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 4, Informative
      "This says to me that either there are very few links to the company's homepage, or there is no company homepage."

      Please excuse any irregularities in the following post because I only got 3 hours of sleep lst night.

      Apparently it's the first case beacause the company homepage is here. They mention that they deal with Adelphia, AT&T, Bell Canada, Bellsouth, Charter Communications, RoadRunner, SBC, Sprint, Telus (Canada) and Time Warner among others.

      They seem to have their fingers deeply into this industry.

    8. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by RollingThunder · · Score: 2
      They seem to have their fingers deeply into this industry.
      Rather apropos, since broadband is great for pulling down loads of porn. ;)
    9. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by toddhisattva · · Score: 1

      I interviewed at Broadjump a few years ago. After some 90 minutes, I still had absolutely no idea what they did. "Software for broadband" was the only reply to my questions. When I asked if it was firmware for cable modems, I was told that the software ran on the computer not the modem.
      They had over a hundred people in cubes. The place kinda had the smell of dot-con about it, so I took a job at MCI instead.

  33. Get the local news involved by Digital+Mage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I say inform your local newspaper or television news station. As you say, since the cable company is almost a monopoly in the area, I'll bet a number of people would love to know about how their local ISP is "spying" on them without them knowing. Most local news outlets are always looking for juicy stories about companies screwing over consumers.

    1. Re:Get the local news involved by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
      In a small town, the local newspaper wouldn't write a story badmouthing a local business - that's ad dollars down the drain, as well as a potential lawsuit for the guy that owns the paper. Cable companies have far deeper pockets than newspapers; unfortunately it shows.

      My local paper runs insipid stories about small town life: recipies, who got married, divorced, arrested, what's going on with local politics (nothing) and classified ads for old Walmart purchases.

    2. Re:Get the local news involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever gets stories about the large pumpkins a guy is growing? Our hometown newspaper is great for junk, soft on real content. I get all my real news from Slashdot and The Register anyway.

    3. Re:Get the local news involved by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2

      lol - just saw a giant pumpkin story this weekend! Google news is my new (non-nerd news) best friend...

  34. Practical Solution. by serial+frame · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Treat your computer like your property! Personally, I would remind the man that he is dealing with MY property, that EULA's are made to be disagreed with, and that I would no longer allow him to touch my property if he continues to install software without me agreeing.

    This makes perfect sense to me, as there are great differences between my house and my computer. Fine, he can run a cable line through my wall; I don't necessarily feel like doing that part myself. But, nobody touches my computers.

    Of course, the easiest way around this is just to be running some variant of Unix at the time. I think I scared (or baffled?) the poor man with my NeXTcube. He backed off and let me do the rest of the installation myself.

    --

    -
    And the Angel said unto me, "These are the cries of the carrots! The cries of the carrots!"
  35. Unscrupulous g*ts by cattlepr0d · · Score: 1

    How many of this guys customers will even notice what he's up to? How many will understand? The Windows-using masses are probably quite used to clicking 'Agree' on every EULA they see anyway. They're just going to think 'he's the technical guy, he knows what he's doing, I'll let him get on with it while I go and make him a cup of tea'.

    It's not dissimilar from the guy who knocked on my door attempting to get me to switch electricity suppliers. He already had my name, he spoke for about five minutes then asked me to sign his form WHILE HE HELD HIS THUMB over the text reading 'I hereby agree to change to CrapCo Electricity' or whatever. I presume that this tactic must work on some people.

    It comes down to the quite astonishing lack of clue in the population at large, I'm afraid...

    --
    R Tape loading error, 0:1
  36. I think you could argue.. by jcr · · Score: 2

    .. That you didn't agree to any of the EULA's since it was the installer monkey who did the clicking on the "agree" buttons.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  37. ATT in richmond by freeefalln · · Score: 2, Insightful

    AT&T Broadband in Richmond, VA installed that same shit on my computer. The tech was an asshole and I told him that I did not need software on my computer to connect through their lines, he got irate and told me that if i wanted to get online i had to have this software. I said kiss my ass, signed the papers and he left. I called AT&T and got a free month of service.

    Just about all of my friends have that broadjump shit on their computer and willingly dont mind. Thats how the American public is, they dont care about privacy, all they want is thier cnn.com and marthastewart.com. They think that loss of privacy is what you give up when you go online.
    Look at the millions of AOL users, who PAY, i repeat PAY, to be advertised to. They see like TV, the Ad's come with the territory.

    1. Re:ATT in richmond by Sheridan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just about all of my friends have that broadjump shit on their computer and willingly dont mind. Thats how the American public is, they dont care about privacy, all they want is thier cnn.com and marthastewart.com.

      Somebody, (I'm 99% sure that this was Bruce Schneier) summed this up by saying that if McDonalds offered a free Big Mac in return for a DNA sample, then there would be queues round the block.

    2. Re:ATT in richmond by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      Now if they would only stop giving me burgers with the DNA sample under the bun...

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  38. Disturbing... by mkeke · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I can see why this is bothering you...

    But the question is: Since the cable guy agreed to the EULA, is he the "End User" or is it the owner of the machine?

    My dad installed some dialup software from an ISP, but he had to remove it as it kept dialling all the time without him knowing of it, untill he suddenly saw the dialup-icon in the systray. Damn those ISP's ;)

    da kekePower

    --
    Life is too short, die now!
  39. Cable Agreement by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

    Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the software; the cable guy did.

    Yeah, but you made some agreement with the Cable company and I'm sure their stupid software was included in that agreement.

    I suppose an easy way of getting around this is to just tell the guy you'll sign his piece of paper if and only if he doesn't install the software.

    And it's not wholey true that cable modems don't require software. There are some companies using point to point protocal to increase security or whatever. So some software may actually be required. My recomendation there is to have a Linksys router on hand. If the cable company doesn't allow them, wait for the cable guy to leave and then set it up.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  40. Not every ISP uses this type of software!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Cable Modem (CM)installer, I can tell you I don't like installing software of anykind on a computer. I don't like even installing a Network Interface Card if I don't have to. My favorite install is a New G4 with OSX, so I just plug in and go. ;)

  41. Similar experience by Gruturo · · Score: 2

    Recently they brought fiber to my house, with a little permanent gateway which gives me 3 10Mbps ports plus a POTS for voip.

    The guy insisted on having me insert the CD into the drive, which will then auto-run and open a welcome window with everything I need to know. For the first 45 seconds I tried telling him that being a Linux box (and without a graphic card at all!) I was very very skeptic about the procedure :-)

    Then, since it was pointless to try and introduce him to the unix world in 10 minutes, I just tried a "dhcpcd eth1" and voila!, I signed the acceptance form as if he did everything and sent him away.

    But if he would prove to be really really stubborn I would have just let him install whatever he wanted on a spare PC just to reghost it 2 minutes later :-)

    --

    Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule.
  42. New nic, heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ya they tried giving me one of those 10 base cards :/

    1. Re:New nic, heh by PizzaFace · · Score: 1

      The 10 Mbit NICs are cheap, but they're plenty fast for DSL or cable Internet access.

    2. Re:New nic, heh by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2

      Well, my cable modem says on the box that it has a max speed of 38 Mbit, well over the 10 Mbit NICs capability. Not very forward thinking...but hey, 640K ought be be enough for anybody! ;-)

    3. Re:New nic, heh by PizzaFace · · Score: 1
      Well, my cable modem says on the box that it has a max speed of 38 Mbit, well over the 10 Mbit NICs capability. Not very forward thinking...
      So if they gave you a 100 Mbit NIC, I guess you'd complain that the 38 Mbit cable modem was "not very forward thinking." No matter what the modem's capacity, or the NIC's capacity, they're not too slow unless your cable Internet connection is saturating them. And it isn't.
    4. Re:New nic, heh by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      So if they gave you a 100 Mbit NIC, I guess you'd complain that the 38 Mbit cable modem was "not very forward thinking.

      Not really. The 38 Mbit limit is based on the laws of physics and the last-mile wiring, and will cost a fortune to break that barrier. Chosing a 10 Mbit card over a 100 Mbit card will save a few dollars.

      unless your cable Internet connection is saturating them. And it isn't.

      True, it isn't. Not yet.

  43. RoadRunner by IwannaCoke · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wasn't asked if I wanted a self install kit, so a tech came out. I was watching over his shoulder the entire time. The only things he did were reconfigure outlook, and change my home page to rr.com.

    I asked him about the home page switch and all he said was that it was policy and I that I could change later.

    1. Re:RoadRunner by Xformer · · Score: 1

      The cable techs that came out and installed my RR modem probably couldn't have gotten that far. The last one that came out (to replace a fried modem) needed MY help to uninstall AIM, etc. from his work machine. His son put it on there or something...

      To this day, I keep humoring the idiots on the national help desk that think I have a Windows box connected to the thing, until I can get to local support where the guys actually have a clue.

      --
      All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
  44. EULA Whore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So not to ask a legality question on slashdot... well okay.. maybe I must...

    Can I be your EULA whore?

    You pay me $10/year and I will click 'okay' on all those pesky EULAs for you. I am willing to bind myself to those terms, so that you dont have to - for a small fee of course.

    Of course, in the case of this cable installer, is he not commiting some kind of felony by installing software that you must use, but that you have not agreed to its EULA - thereby forcing you to commit a crime. And if it is not a crime, then the question remains: "Can I be your EULA whore?"

  45. Been there by Malicious · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Having been a cable guy, all i can tell you is, we don't know what we're installing either. The cable company asks us to install the software on their disc, as part of the custom install. We don't ask questions. Most people who have the custom install are apes. Total green horns. They prefer to have all kinds of extra stuff to signify their connection to the internet, as opposed to it 'just working'

    Chances are, if you ask your cable guy not to install it, he'll be more than happy not to, because he can get you to sign, and move onto the next house ASAP.

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:Been there by moogla · · Score: 2

      ::nods in agreement::

      I can understand the mindset behind wanting the extra stuff. For example, you can blame it when your connection goes out. Then you can spend an hour installing and uninstalling it, while at the same time the techs have rebooted the head-end router and your connection magically comes back. The confused user pats himself on the back thinking his twiddling fixed it.

      It makes you feel like you're getting more, because you're jealous of all those coddled AOL users. Most people don't know what to do with an open-ended net connection. If they didn't have a gaudy portal/start page with links, they'd probably never use it at all!

      --
      Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  46. Cable Guy by PegQuin · · Score: 1

    Write a letter to your Congressman, they have plenty to hide so they should be helpful. What do you think they're doing with your television viewing data?

    --
    PegQuin--I've got a sneakin' suspicion
  47. AT&T will also take your old modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most likely the software is to mainly throttle your bandwidth or even monitor it it and shut it down if it goes over a certain limit. AT&T doesn't stop at software, they began distributing bandwidth "capped" modems after they began to oversell their network, that performed significantly less than their originals. On a sidenote about cable companies: their policy of charging for radio reception through the cable or having multiple tv's off of one split cable is ludicrous but they will enforce it. I had split my cable for radio reception (Howard Stern) and had left some of the bare copper exposed. Within a week I saw an AT&T van slowly stalking my neighborhood and eventually they knocked on my door and told me they had picked up a HUGE signal from my apartment. I promised to never do it again and promptly covered the exposed copper and reconnected it to my radio as soon as they left :).

    1. Re:AT&T will also take your old modem by melios · · Score: 0
      Taken from the EULA on this page (provider of Yahoo! DSL service):
      RIGHT TO TERMINATE NETWORK-BASED SERVICES: By using the Licensed Software, you acknowledge and agree that BroadJump and SBC Internet Services shall at all times retain the right to terminate any and all on-going network-based services that you receive pursuant to your use of the Licensed Software for any reason whatsoever, including without limitation your refusal to allow BroadJump and/or SBC Internet Services to install on your computer any upgrade or modification to the Licensed Software in the future.
  48. Cablevision -- no problemo by nbvb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I switched from Speakeasy DSL to Optimum Online when I moved (No DSL in new neighborhood... d'oh!!)

    When the Speakeasy guy came out 2+ years ago, I had done all the "inside wiring" myself (this was back in the dedicated-line days ...) The guy just looked at it, and said, and I quote "Damn! You did a better job than I would have." The guy literally handed me the DSL bridge (It's NOT A MODEM DAMNIT!), we plugged it in, he saw the lights "go green" and said "good 'nuff for me."

    When the Optimum Online guy came out here (I needed someone to come out since I don't subscribe to cable ... DirecTV rocks), I had my Linksys router plugged into my iBook.

    First thing he did was go outside, climb the pole and turn the line on. when he did that, the cable bridge (IT'S NOT A MODEM DAMNIT!) "went green" and that was that.

    All he asked was to see me pull up a web page. That was good enough.

    Seriously, don't give the guy the old chip-on-the-shoulder attitude. Don't sound like a clueless yutz, either. Just explain to the guy that listen, it's my machine and I'll install all the software on it, thanks. It's already configured for the network -- I read the directions (on the web, in the box, etc.)

    The installers are usually _very_ cool about that stuff. In fact, the cable guy saw my Sun Microsystems jacket and started asking me some questions... we had a good long talk about IP networks and stuff, since he was looking to go to some Cisco courses and get outta the cable install business :)

    Best of luck with the installs! Remember, don't give them an attitude, just convince them that your machine is all ready to go. Remember, if they get out of there in 5 minutes instead of 2 hours, it means they get to take a long lunch ;)

    --NBVB

    1. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      It's NOT A MODEM DAMNIT!

      IIRC, the connection between my DSL modem, and the CO is a analog connection. Therefore my DSL MODEM has to convert my digital signal to an analog (MODulate) signal, and convert Verizon's signal from a analog signal to a digital (DEModulate) signal. Hence in actuality it is a MODEM.!

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    2. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by radish · · Score: 5, Informative


      Why isn't a DSL "box" a modem? It modulates digital data into analogue and pipes that analogue signal out over a PSTN line. Which is exactly what a modem does, just at a much higher frequency. Given that it works in both directions I would say it qualifies as a MOdulator-DEModulator.

      I'm not flaming...just curious...it's perfectly possible you know something I don't ;)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by hivemind_d5g · · Score: 1

      Yep, back when I worked as a RR installer, that was the deal. Show me that you're not a yutz who's going to call my boss or tech support after I leave and I don't care what you do. It's just a longer lunch for me... :) Now that I have 6 installers working for me, I train them the same way.

    4. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by PhoenxHwk · · Score: 2

      You're right, DirecTV DSL does rock. I use it and love it. A little more bandwidth would be nice, but I really like all the other features they have.

    5. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by matthew.thompson · · Score: 3, Informative

      ER - ADSL does use a modem. The signals transmitted are in the analogue domain and cross a number of frequencies - these have to be demultiplexed into a serial bitstream for use by your digital devices.

      Just incase you didn't realise the DEM in modem stands for Demultiplexor.

      When I was trialling DSL here in the UK I had a DSL router AND a DSL modem as seperate boxes. The DSL modem took the analogue signals and converted them into the ATM that they were a representation of. The router then translated the ATM into Ethernet for my local area network. Generally in the UK all ADSL is PPPoA.

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    6. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by renehollan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The guy just looked at it, and said, and I quote "Damn! You did a better job than I would have."

      Yeah, same here.

      I had Internet America install my DSL service. They have a self-install option, with micro-filters and all, but it was not available to me because I was so far from the C.O. (15.6 kft) that I needed a dedicated pair to get any decent bandwidth (I chose the 768kb/s down, 384 kb/s up option) -- They said I could probably get that, via ADSL if I opted to go with a dedicated pair, and, if it didn't work, all charges would be refunded. Rather cool, actually.

      Of course, the dedicated pair costs me some US$15 a month from the telco for a total of $81.18 a month, but the service has been great: static IP, no caps, I can run "small" servers and so on. And, while it's no doubt a bridged connection, I do see good download speeds. So I'm happy. None of this "ping is a hacker's tool, the use of which violates the AUP" crap.

      Anyway, I receive a Broadxtent bridge in the mail, and a note to schedule an appointment. I mount the bridge in my headend, check the demarc, and lo and behold!, I have two brand new pairs already pulled for the DSL service. So, I schedule the install for the next day. Meanwhile, I figure, "Heck, all I have to do is hook up that pair, cross-connect it to the bridge connection on the right 110 block, and configure my router, and I should be all set." Sure enuf, that's all it took.

      So, I call Internet America first thing the next day, and tell them to not bother sending the installer, it's alive, kicking, and showing decent up/down speeds. "But sir, we want to make sure it's installed correctly to avoid a service call." O.K., I can understand this. "Anyway, you paid the $150 installation fee (the telco pair drop portion was unavoidable anyway) -- might as well have the tech stop by." Well, O.K. then.

      Tech shows up, looks at my computer, working fine, with an RJ45 cable snaking off (I hadn't finished the drop to that room yet, so I just snaked a cable back to the headend), and asks, "Where's our modem?" "The headend," I reply, "I hadn't installed the drop to this room yet. Follow the ethernet cable."

      So, he does, and sure enough, I hear a "Damn! I wouldn'tve done as good a job!" He smiled, we talked shop for about 10 minutes, and that was it.

      To their credit, Internet America left my computer alone, gave me a static IP with no fuss, and have provided decent service since. The Broadxtent bridge locks up every few months, but a power-cycle fixes that.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    7. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      The signals transmitted are in the analogue domain and cross a number of frequencies - these have to be demultiplexed into a serial bitstream for use by your digital devices.

      Just incase you didn't realise the DEM in modem stands for Demultiplexor.


      The word you're looking for is modulate, not multiplex. I could be wrong, but I doubt your modem is sending multiple signals over the same stream simultaneously, as that sort of thing's usually reserved for much larger bandwidth uses (ie why's a T1 better than 1.5mb DSL?).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    8. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't call his bluff.

      When his ego deflates it gets stuck all over everything!

    9. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by nbvb · · Score: 2

      Anything that speaks ATM to me isn't a modem ;)

      A modem, IMNSHO, indicates connection to a circuit-switched network.

      My understanding was that the signal was digital ATM back to the CO. But I'm not 100% sure of that. Especially now in the era of shared-line signals ...

      I could be wrong. It's been a while since I looked at the DSL specs. ;)

      --NBVB

    10. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by Snarl · · Score: 1

      DSL tech people want to install stuff for customers, because a fair number of customers say they'll install it themselves (they're IT Experts!) and then in two days, the "savvy" customer will call and ask for help, thus creating more work for company:

      "I tried all the things, but somehow it didn't work...! I've tried everything!"

    11. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by alexburke · · Score: 2

      cross-connect it to the bridge connection on the right 110 block

      Ewwww!

      BIX rocks. The official Nortel tool costs a fortune (like C$80), but is basically unbreakable. Also, no need to ever change "blades" like with 110.

      Once you've worked with it, there's no going back.

    12. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by faster · · Score: 1

      Same with Oceanic in Hawaii. The guy came out, saw the router and switch (which are expressly forbidden unless you pay about twice the regular residential price), and noticed that I wasn't running Windows.

      So he installed the cable modem and asked me if I could see the home page for Oceanic. He even made up a T fitting with a short cable to split the signal off for the cable modem, and an extension for the TV (it lives in a closet unless my kid is watching Elmo or something).

      Then he left. No hassles.

      My best cable experience ever. Of course, everything is better in Hawaii. :)

    13. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by olethrosdc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hm, the physical layer of the DSL line can just be described as a MODEM kind of thing. But there are other layers in the DSL box. That's why it is a bridge and not just a modem. DSL is supposed to be able to carry many different kinds of traffic and there are many different bridging protocls that you can use with it, depending on what you DSL box can actually do. Most of the bridging is related to EthernetATM stuff. Also, PPPoE in some cases. And if your box supports an ATM outlet as well (not a lotof chance, unless you're the ISP), you are going to have to call your box a switch B}

      --

      I miss my rubber keyboard.(Homepage)

    14. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by renehollan · · Score: 2
      I dunno, I didn't find it a hassle, or expensive. I was already using 110 blocks for telco lines, so it made sense.

      Oh, and it should be obvious, but my original post should have noted "two wires" and not "two pairs" with regard to the DSL line at the demark. Silly me.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    15. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 2
      Same experience here. The install tech said that he needed to install some software. I told him,

      Well, I run Linux. If you really need me to, I can repartition the hard drive, install Windows 98, let you install your stuff, and delete it later, but you'll have to wait awhile.

      So he says,

      Well, I gotta install this stuff or I don't get paid. How about I just say that I installed it and you just sign here saying that I installed it.
      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
    16. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that it works in both directions I would say it qualifies as a MOdulator-DEModulator.

      Yeah, but the "tech" term for it is CSU/DSU - Or so I'm told.

    17. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      That's only because "IT expert" nowadays means "I can use Word". Which is a real sad state, because it spoils it for every real IT expert out there.
      Anyways, when the DSL guy came over to our place, I showed him the prepared OpenBSD box and asked him if he wanted to try. He said: "no" plugged in his own laptop to test if the connection was up, then he showed to the connection worked. Finally he wished me good luck and left with a big smile on his face.

    18. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      It's a router. Just as a Cisco 1600 that happens to have an ISDN card in it isn't a modem, neither is a DSL router.

    19. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by radish · · Score: 2

      Mine certainly is not a router, being as it's a USB device. I'd accept "DSL Modem with bridging" or something like that, as it does the whole pppoa thing, but a router it ain't.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    20. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (IT'S NOT A MODEM DAMNIT!)

      ITS NOT A BRIDGE DAMNIT!

      ITS A ROUTER!

      yeah im probably wrong but i always thought bridges did routing thru software and routers did there routing thru hardcoded calls.

      am i wrong.

    21. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      Some are bridges too, though most are routers. The Cisco 600 and 800 series that are so popular are actually brouters, the'll do either depending on what you want. If your service is PPPoA then your device is a router. Routers don't ahve to be external and don't ahve to have an eithernet jack. you can have a router inside your computer (your computer can be a router for that matter). all router means is that the device operates at Layer-3. Bridges are Layer-2 devices.

    22. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by Phroggy · · Score: 2

      The official technical term is "CPE", "Customer Premise Equipment".

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    23. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by alexburke · · Score: 1

      Oh, and it should be obvious, but my original post should have noted "two wires" and not "two pairs" with regard to the DSL line at the demark. Silly me.

      I figured either that was the case or you had some funky two-pair SDSL or VDSL thing going on.

  49. I Had to Help The Roadrunner Tech by bono2001 · · Score: 1

    Just got RR service about two months ago. The cable guy was late for his appointment (typical). I was at work and I had left instructions for my wife to give him some details about my configuration as I have several machines networked. I talked to the tech as he first got there and he told me that they had to install MS Outlook express whether I used it or not for email. I grumbled about not wanting that Virus magnet on my PC but the tech insisted. Aside from that the only other piece of software he messed with was Internet Explorer which he set to the RR page by default. Forget about trying to get them to install on Linux or anything non-MS. They have a specific drill they go through and if it isn't on the menu forget it.

    The funny part came about three hours later at the point the tech was about to give up on my install. The modem was in, the software was in but the gateway wouldn't respond. I told him that I was on a static IP address and he'd have to change the setting to dynamic IP. I had to walk him through the steps to change the IP settings! A short reboot later and I'm setup.

    I get home later that night and rip out outlook, setup Mozilla, buy and install a cable router and everything has run like greased lightning ever since.

    1. Re:I Had to Help The Roadrunner Tech by Junta · · Score: 2

      What, you got roadrunner service and paid for them to do their 'installation'. All I ever did (3 times), is have them come, hook up the cable, call in the mac address, and watch the lights go solid. Then they leave, without ever touching the computer. Cheaper and more useful, no spyware.... Self installation only requires that you set up your computer to get an IP through DHCP, that's it..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:I Had to Help The Roadrunner Tech by bono2001 · · Score: 1

      Didn't pay extra. RR is new in my area and had all sorts of "free" stuff for signing up (i.e., installation 3 months 1/2 price etc).

  50. BroadJump Client by kalimar · · Score: 1

    This is really interesting. No really. I subscribed to AT&T BroadBand. They installed the BroadJump Client. I don't think I've ever seen it running on my system. The AT&T startup (which retrieves my account information) runs when I boot my machine, but there aren't any added icons in my system tray. I wondered about what the BroadJump client was but didn't really pay any attention to it since it never seemed to be running anywhere. I guess I'll check my system again when I get home.

  51. The cable guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in Jim Carrey? Heeeeelp!

  52. Stupid installers by pirodude · · Score: 2

    My cable installer tried dropping the cd in my linux box and wondered why it wasn't auto running. The he explained that you couldn't get online without their software. I proceeded to restart the network and grab an ip and up popped /.. That shut him up.

  53. a way around it by eagl · · Score: 2

    I keep an old PC around for experimentation and I had the cable guy install everything to that PC. When he was gone. I re-ran the cable to my firewall.

    Consumers won't get a foothold with complaints because 99% of custmers (myself included) are happy enough with finally having high speed internet that they aren't willing to rock the boat.

  54. Lock it out with a firewall? by GeckoFood · · Score: 1

    Can you use firewall software to lock down any crap they install on there? With the firewall I have installed, any time any application tries to hit the 'net I get a notification and an opportunity to shut the bastard down. Perhaps it's not an ideal setup, but at least I know who's trying to talk to the 'net behind the scenes. If they *have* to install their junk on your system, this is possibly one way to maintain your privacy a bit...

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
  55. It varies from installer to installer by gotr00t · · Score: 1
    A couple of months ago, I got cable installed, and the installer person seemed to be more trained in installing cabler service for televisions, and not really at installing broadband for computers. Therefore, after he installed the cables, he gave me a software package, and merely offered to install it, but instead, I just stopped all network services, then started DHCP... got an IP address, and it started to work.

    Since I use Linux, he couden't install the software anyway, so, it really depends on what ISP you use. I use Time Warner, and their contract only provides that the service personnel provide a working connection... there is no clause for installing their particular software package.

    1. Re:It varies from installer to installer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had service with Mediaone, which turned into ATTBI. At one point they turned off *our* Internet when the people upstairs moved out, and so they needed to come back to turn it on. The installer was completely baffled by my setup (firewall PC running OpenBSD, network of NAT'd computers behind the firewall) -- "You can't network multiple computers that way! It's impossible! We only give you one IP number, and it depends on your MAC address." He also wanted to install software on my PC; I gave him a blank computer to play with. That was one of a string of bad customer support experiences that finally made us cancel ATTBI....

      My favorite tech support call went like this, however. In the end, it was a problem with the wiring, and my fault, but I hadn't diagnosed it yet.

      Me: "I can't keep a persistent connection. I think I'm dropping packets in bunches, because every TCP connection I make hangs after a minute or two."

      Tech: "Can you surf the web, sir?"

      Me: "Yes, but I can't keep an SSH session or IRC going."

      Tech: "What webpages are you having trouble with?"

      Me: "I'm not having trouble with webpages. I'm having trouble with persistent connections. I think it may be a router upstream from me having problems, or a bad wire somewhere."

      Tech: "Okay, sir, what operating system are you using?"

      Me: "Windows 2000, but you should know it's behind a firewall that's doing network address translation."

      Tech: "Turn off the firewall. It's probably blocking things."

      Me: "I *know* it's blocking things. That's what it's supposed to do. But if I turn it off, I won't get any traffic at all except from inside my network."

      Tech: "Sir, the firewall is probably causing the problem. Please turn it off so we can test your connection."

      Me: "It's a separate hardware firewall. I can shell to it and see that it is also having trouble connecting...."

      Tech: "Sir, what type of firewall are you running?"

      Me: "It's a separate box, Pentium 200 running OpenBSD 3.1, doing network address translation and packet filtering."

      Tech: "Is it ZoneAlarm?"

      Me: "No. Listen, do you have a supervisor I can speak to? I don't think we're going to get very far."

      Tech: "He's out of the office right now. I can have him call you back within an hour."

      Fortunately, before that was necessary, I got a phone and checked all the connections, and I didn't have to escalate it further.

  56. Just do the Common Sense thing... by RobertAG · · Score: 5, Informative

    On Windows,

    Press START, SETTINGS, Go into Control Panel, Select Add/Remove Software and remove the offending software.

    If they complain, invent a ficticious "Computer Guy" who told you it was the reason your system was locking up all the time.

    Mention that you have lots of games and Internet Explorer "add-ons" that you have downloaded and installed. Believe me, NO technician will want to muck about through a myriad of windows software installations to troubleshoot their spyware.

    They'll go away.

    1. Re:Just do the Common Sense thing... by pheared · · Score: 1

      Of course, can you actually be sure that the software was removed? That Add/Remove button only follows the instructions of the program that was installed, right? ...which could easily be told not to remove anything at all.

      And there have been times in the past where the stupid thing will do nothing at all because the .INF or whatever dumb file wasn't there anymore and so it didn't know how to uninstall the program.

      The real answer is to just use obscure OS's that the Cable Guy surely has no experience with, much less software for.

    2. Re:Just do the Common Sense thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As with any spyware, The Add/Remove Program is worthless. Do not let anyone install thier "necissary" software on your PC.

    3. Re:Just do the Common Sense thing... by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

      Under Comcast Install it for the most part is. Just like any crappy windows software it leaves it dir. config files and a few reg. because they are created after the install but it stops running and disapears. The software isn't spyware. It take a snapshot of you network setup and store it both locally and remotely on a comcast server so that tech support it theory could look at you setting to confirm your configartion is the same. As includes some crappy support software that will try and guide you thought basic repairs that no one uses because those that the instructions would help just call in to support and those that would they to fix it have for the most part already tried all of those fixes.

      That software isn't nessacy and most install tech wont install if the sub ask you not to but the installer probly wouldn't known how to setup a pc without installing the software so it would be up to the sub to get there PC working.

    4. Re:Just do the Common Sense thing... by Skapare · · Score: 2

      I mostly use Linux, but occaisionally I need to use Windows for something. One of my peecees is designated for that, but it also does other stuff at other times. What I did was installed a clean copy of Windows with all the apps I might need (e.g. Office, Visio, etc). I separated My Documents over to D: (both C: and D: are 2GB each), verified I could get a couple of clean reboots after customizing everything, then shut down Windows and booted Linux from a CD I made. From there I made separate compressed backups of the first few sectors of the HD (up to the first partition), and the C: and D: partitions as raw block sector files. Gzip got my 2GB Windows install down to 700MB. I burned a couple CDs with it for backup and keep the compressed images on a couple Linux boxes. Whenever I need to run Windows, I boot Linux from that CD again, and download the image back to the HD. Voila, fresh unadulterated Windows (which happens to now days think it hasn't been booted for a couple years because I don't bother to back-set the CPU clock).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    5. Re:Just do the Common Sense thing... by axlrosen · · Score: 2

      Sometimes these things don't show up in Add/Remove. When I got AT&T/MediaOne, it installed SAUpdate.exe and CFD.exe, and they're not in Add/Remove. See http://www.pacs-portal.co.uk/startup_pages/startup _full.htm.

    6. Re:Just do the Common Sense thing... by penpen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was a little bit curious as to how many people have actually written an installer. It appears to me that most people believe that if you magically go to control panel and add/remove that the program will be removed.

      You can easily write an installer that will leave files behind. The best places are usually places like winnt/system32. After all that's were all the upgraded system dll's are placed, and since there's so many files there people don't seem to look that hard. Personally I'd be looking through other things most notably though would be windows nt services to see if they plugged in anything spicy there.

      Just remember just because you "uninstall" something doesn't mean it still isn't there.

  57. Oh, it gets even better... (slightly OT, I guess) by GORDOOM · · Score: 1

    When I had cable internet installed in my room in res this year, the installer came and did the hookup of the actual cable modem, and then handed me a TOS agreement for me to sign.

    "OK, just let me read through it and then I'll sign."

    "No, you have to sign it now. You can read it later."

    "No, I'm going to sign it after I've read it."

    "I don't have time to wait for you to read it. Just sign it now!"

    "Like hell I'm going to sign a legal agreement that I haven't even read!"

    At this point, the installer stormed off in a huff, muttering insults to me as he went down the hall. He never did come back to collect the agreement from me. For a second I was worried that he was just going to pack up and leave instead of hooking me up...

  58. Missing the point by drafalski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am sure most any Slashdot reader could remove the software or just go with a self-install kit. My parents, or a lot of my friends, could not. I think the issue here is that these people - ones who probably didn't watch/notice all the EULAs being clicked for them - are being monitored/tracked/whatever as if they had given their consent.

    The installer has acted as their representative without their knowledge or consent. While the EULA would easily get tossed out if they wanted to fight it, they wouldn't know there was anything to fight and they would have already been monitores/etc already.

    And yes, I know the ISP monitors traffic anyway, but it is different when they are installing software on your computer and agreeing to a EULA for you.

  59. Shady Installers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think that the cable installed was going to do the same thing to my PC when he came in to install it. Luckily I am running an "unsupported" OS (that being Gentoo Linux), so he had no idea where or how to install software on the machine.
    I believe that the reasoning behind the cable company saying "es, a tech has to install your modem. No, you cannot install it yourself." is the fact that they want to install THEIR software on there.
    Originally I had DSL through my Telco. The guy came in, installed Netscape and a Novell Client, neither of which I had previously. And the guy never even asked. When I confronted him on it, he actually looked scared when I started growling at him for installing software on my PC that he never asked, nor I requested. He made up some excuse that I was going to need Netscape in order to browse the web because no other browser worked on their system. I just rolled my eyes and told the guy to hook the modem up and get out, I would do the setup myself. Poof! He was gone. LOL

  60. The exact opposite by radish · · Score: 5, Interesting


    In the UK when a guy from BT cam around to install my DSL he did the exact opposite. They're specifically not allowed to touch my PC as they're not insured for any damage. So the engineer has a laptop, he plugs in the modem and proves the line works. Then I sign him off, he gives me the modem and a driver disc and it's up to me.

    Of course this was 2 years ago, these days the engineer doesn't even come over...

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    1. Re:The exact opposite by satterth · · Score: 1

      This is very similar to what happened at my parents place. Mom and Pop asked me to be around for the cable guy to show him what room the computer was in and where the cable jack was in the basement. The guy brought the line to the room and tested it with his laptop, then asked if i needed help to setup DHCP and e-mail settings. I said no, and he handed me a peice of paper with the server address's i needed so we can setup e-mail accounts online and left. Pretty simple.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  61. my foot was down by ronaldcromwell · · Score: 1

    when i got my cable installed, the modem had to be 'activated' via a piece of windows software. (i run a mac, so we had to use my dad's computer) being the asshole that i am, i drilled the install guy about what he's to do if someone doesn't run windows. alas, he was a fool and had no answer. he ended up installing the software, and i wouldn't let him leave until i had removed it, rebooted the computer, and established that the modem would still work.

  62. Charter did this during the switch over by zietlow · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Charter did this during the switch over from @home. They installed thier client and said you HAD to install this otherwise you could not get on the internet. It ripped out ALL your network settings and then replaced it with all thier and MS's "personalized" corporate feces.

    They also said they did not turn on the software, but after portscanning all of Charter's IP space that Arin said was allocated to them over 13,000 computers had this port listening out of over 25,000+ (4.5 Class C's) were actively listening for connections and would accept a connection if you telnetted to the port. Whereas scanning a non charter IP subnet there were less than 20 that accepted this (I don't have my numbers with me ATM).

    The wonderful fellows at Securepipe.com Looked into this and brought it up with the local "watch dog" columnist for one of the local papers who wrote an article about this. Charter was not happy. The guys at Securepipe also brought this up with the local cable commission. Who were semi interested in this issue. About a week later port filtering was in place, including port 641 (what the software runs on).

    They said the use was for the ability to remotely help users. Yes this is a nice function to have, but what if this fell into the wrong hands? The Broadjump software is based off of an older version of VNC that has some weak authentication issues. And also dealing with Charter and @home techs I wouldn't trust these people with my computer anyway. I don't trust my mother with my computer.

    This was back in Novemeber/December who knows what they could do now.

    wi2600.org You can read the threads here, many to list and you can see the research that we did to get into this. I do not know if an electronic copy of the mentioned newspaper article exists but if it does, I will try and get it posted.

    --
    Slashdot # 199661 the number that's the same upside down and right side up
    1. Re:Charter did this during the switch over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember Charter claiming that I had to run it to access the internet. I assumed it merely enabled DHCP and so i did it myself. Internet's been working great since then. Interesting that it was more than that - glad i didn't touch it!!

      I've had BAD luck with these netinstaller programs before (eg, reinstalling Eudora - which erased my existing Eudora-based email. Fortunately, i had a somewhat recent backup).

      Tom

    2. Re:Charter did this during the switch over by VP · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Charter (at least in July) lets you decline the installation of their software - they have a special check box on their form, where you can sign that you declined it.

    3. Re:Charter did this during the switch over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Charter, but since I'm a minor they weren't allowed into my house. The guy was quite friendly, just had to check the basement for wiring, gave me the modem, USB adapter, plugged it in, and it went. Even talked waiting for someone legal to come home and sign the papers. There was software, and when asked about it, admitted it really wasn't needed, and was quite impressed with what I knew. I'm quite happy with Charter here, besides the connection occasionaly being knocked out late nights.

  63. Charter installs VNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I got Charter Pipeline last year and I installed the software on my WinXP box. It put this hideous white and blue Charter branded skin on IE's buttons. While searching through the Broadjump directory to figure out how to remove the ugly skin, I found vnchooks.dll. I immediately wiped the system and reinstalled the OS. I then called Charter and told them that they are being paid for net access only and I never gave them the right to monitor my computer (there was no verbal or written statement given to me by the installer about the software). I was told that they use VNC to get system configuration in case I'm having trouble with my net connection. Umm, if I'm having trouble with my net connection, how am I supposed to get my computer to communicate my info to Charter's tech support? Idiots. The man then told me that since I have WinXP, that people can use Remote Desktop to communicate with my machine. I told the idiot that I knew about remote desktop and I have it disabled and at least Microsoft told you about the feature while installing the operating system.

    In short, don't install cable modem software. Get an external cable modem, an ethernet card, and a Linksys router. That should be all you need.

  64. It's My Computer by kentborg · · Score: 1

    I don't let anyone install things on my computer. And I am not much interested in my installing their software for them. And I certainly am not attracted to the clueless folks who run cable systems.

    But when I subscribed to DSL back when (*not* from the clueless phone company) I was intending to have a Linux machine on that wire, but I had a Macintosh ready to demonstrate whether it worked or not. I guess I would have let him install software over my frowns. But I would have wiped it after investigating.

    -kb

  65. nope... by Knacklappen · · Score: 1

    I think there will always be Joe Sixpack who does not want to fiddle with the installation. As long as he can get his pr0n, everything will be fine. So, I don't see the harm in informing fellow /. readers about such practices.

    --


    Excellence: Moderate (mostly affected by comments on your karma)
    1. Re:nope... by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 1

      Besides, how many JoeSixPacks know that Slashdot even exist. There are perhaps a few but not enough.

      --
      There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
  66. Tell them you're running Linux by srussell · · Score: 2

    That's what I did. They didn't even look at my computer. Of course, I wasn't lying, but that's not relevant.

    1. Re:Tell them you're running Linux by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 1

      Some ISPs have Windows 95 or Mac OS as part of their 'minimum requirements'.

      --


      - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.
  67. If he needs a signature ... by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 1

    Don't put up a fuss and sign it as "Daffy Duck" or "Mickey Mouse".

  68. Now, what if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. . uninstalling this software and using the connection without it would require you to "circumvent a copy protection" ?

  69. I said "Get yo' damn hands off my machine!" by lost+sheep · · Score: 0

    Adelphia members can opt out of them even touching your computer. At least I did. When they came to install it, I just said that I didn't want any computer support from them. I signed a little release thing saying that I would release them from any computer support. Of course, there was a small downside, one time the cable modem just fried, but it took me two weeks to convince them it wasn't my computer.

    --
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Lost Sheep to Shepard, you got your ears on?
    1. Re:I said "Get yo' damn hands off my machine!" by jimmy_dean · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's what I did too. I have Road Runner cable service and I even saved money on the initial fee. The guy just hooked up the proper coax cables and verified the connection in the room where the cable modem would hook up. However, if you opt for this self-installation of the software the guy doesn't verify that the service runs correctly or anything - at least he/she doesn't have to. The guy who installed my service was very nice and actually waited for me to install the software and hook the cable modem up to my computer and left after I told him that it worked well. Road Runner is also a very fast and stable cable modem service in my area and would totally recommend it to anyone.

      --
      -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.
  70. Comcast - Linux by wiredog · · Score: 2

    Ditto on signing the docs. And then I just enabled dhcpd in the appropriate rc script. Works fine.

    1. Re:Comcast - Linux by Strike · · Score: 1

      I hope you also enabled dhcpcd as well!

  71. That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Hell+O'World · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But what about the mortals? 99% of this monopolistic company's customers have this crap installed on their computer, didn't ask for it, didn't agree to it, and don't even know it's there! Doesn't that strike you as wrong? Perhaps even evil? Laws are not keeping up with technology, and the inherent evil of capitalism is driving us into a dangerous situation. These companies justify their actions based just on maximizing profits for their shareholders. They don't care what petty moral problems this imposes.

    1. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      "evil of capitalism"

      Please take this complementary economics course and call me in the morning.

    2. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's never been a requirement for posting on Slashdot before. Why start now?

    3. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by fialar · · Score: 3, Funny
      Please take a complimentary course on "social ethics and justice" and call ME in the morning.

      Capitalism is a short-sighted system that puts profits before people, dollars before the environment.

      Free your mind, read Z Mag

    4. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      It is kinda funny you mention "evil of capitalism". I assume that you are taking a shot at capitalism.

      This kind of crap is exactly what would NOT happen in a true capitalist system. It is because there is a monopoly on broadband currently that prevents any competition. Most people have only one choice for broadband Cable, some have two DSL and Cable. But guess what!? You only have ONE comany to go with for either one of those. You still have to deal with your local phone company for DSL and unfortunately you only have ONE cable provider per area.

      Now if you had a choice of broadband providers and one of those companies did this type of crap, then you can sure as heck bet that their competition would bring out this point.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    5. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by (trb001) · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Timeout...this is not evil. Someone sniping 14 people 'just because' is evil. Someone attempting to wipe a race off the planet is evil. This may be slightly immoral, but the reason they have you sign is because they want to make sure you authorized the install. If you don't want it, tell him not to install the software. 99% of the people out there DON'T CARE that it's on there, and probably at least half of them don't care what it's doing with their data.

      Fact is, there is nothing illegal about them installing software on your computer with your consent. Their software isn't breaking the law and it isn't hurting your computer. You are requesting a service from them and, as part of that service, they are installing additional products as they see fit. Opt out, it's quite easy, I wouldn't let a cable installer within 10 feet of my computer ("Just hand me the cat-5 and nobody gets hurt...")

      I'm embarassed that the parent post got modded up as Insightful.

      --trb

    6. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >But what about the mortals?

      Most people couldn't give a shit what software is on their pc, as long as it works. Does this software stop your computer from working?
      Thought not.

    7. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by lousyd · · Score: 1

      Ho-hum...

      -Todd

      --
      If aspiration is a virtue, achievement cannot be a vice.
    8. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Capitalism is a short-sighted system that puts profits before people, dollars before the environment."

      I don't think that you understand what capitalism actually is. Since you recommend the person to take a cource in "social ethics and justice", I will also recommend that the person realize that well over 85% of teachers are die hard liberals and some consider themselves socialist. So please understand that before taking a course. But if we are recommending ways to learn on capitalism, then I would get

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/newt/tap es .html

      Sorry for not doing html tags! Just cut and paste.

      Now to get this thing back on topic...

      What the Cable company is doing is wrong. They will probably get sued over this. The person didn't agree to any EULA, AND probably more importantly the user didn't get the option to counter the contract. Specifically they didn't get an option to do a fair negotiation with the company. This cable company is foolish to do this and it will come back to haunt them. Not a very smart thing, but then they are a monopoly in that area... kinda like socialism...

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    9. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by TFloore · · Score: 2
      Blockquoteth the poster:
      But what about the mortals? 99% of this monopolistic company's customers have this crap installed on their computer, didn't ask for it, didn't agree to it, and don't even know it's there! Doesn't that strike you as wrong?

      Okay, so go talk to a lawyer.

      You say you have a company installing what you seem to think is monitoring and surveillance technology in your private residence without your informed consent.

      If this is realy the case, it is probably illegal. Now, more than likely, you signed the little paper giving them blanket permission to do anything they wanted to your machine, and this is another case of "read the contract before you sign it" so you probably will just be wasting your $150 talking with the lawyer.

      But hey, maybe they missed something in the contract because the tech people at the cable company didn't talk to the lawyers at the cable company, and you can get something out of it. Maybe a "no extra software" install option, or maybe more complete informed consent.

      Assuming you want to go to that much trouble.

      But, really, you just wanted to complain to the crowd here, right?
      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
    10. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by cduffy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Capitalism is a short-sighted system that puts profits before people, dollars before the environment.

      Bloody hell. Capitalism has nothing to do with ethics or justice; it's simply a resource allocation method -- a means of getting things to places where they're needed and encouraging production. If you think central planning (the only real altenative) works better, you need to take a good look at just how many cities in the Soviet Union had access to such necessities as (say) aspirin, or at how effectively operating funds were allocated to infrastructure (where economic conditions which in a capitalist economy would have been compensated for by a shortage of service instead resulted in the railways system being run into the ground unmaintained).

      Capitalism doesn't put profits before people, people do. It's not a problem with the system, it's a problem with human nature -- and human nature is one thing you just can't fix. Have a minimally controlled economy, and people will play dirty to stay on top of it -- but the market itself will punish them if they play too dirty. Have a highly controlled economy, OTOH, and anyone who wants to play dirty needs but to get the support of a relatively small group within the governing agency; the market (that is to say, the public) no longer has its highly direct say (in the choice to buy or otherwise).

      Take that macroeconomics course, and understand the consequences of the available systems. When you understand what it is you're arguing for under the guise of social ethics and justice, then your arguments will be worth listenening to.

    11. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This kind of crap is exactly what would NOT happen in a true capitalist system. ... unfortunately you only have ONE cable provider per area.

      I'd say this is right on - we actually have two cable providers in our area. Neither installs this software when they bring the modem over. They do set your home page to their ad-laden "portals", but that's easily fixed.

    12. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laws are not keeping up with technology

      What about wiretap laws?

    13. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by TheDawgLives · · Score: 0

      Capitalism is a short-sighted system that puts profits before people, dollars before the environment.

      If you want to see some "short-sighted" forms of government, read the history of Communisn and Fascism, or beter yet look them up on dictionary.com.
      I would hardly call Capitalism "short-sighted" when it has been around in some form or another since the dawn of time.

      As far as evile is conserned, remember Hitler who killed people senselessly? How about Stalin, who killed more people in his purges than Hitler? Surely even you would admit that Communism and Fascism are the evile "systems".

      I gladly take Capitalism and if you are dissatasfied with our government, why don't you defect to China, North Korea, North Vietnam, Iraq, or Cuba? What? They are all dirt poor and you couldn't afford any of the "necessities" that you enjoy now? Oh, maybe Capitalism isn't so that bad after all.

      --
      -TheDawgLives suckitdown
    14. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Capitalism is a short-sighted system that puts >profits before people, dollars before the >environment.

      *sigh* Hey, maybe you should put down your Dar Williams CDs for a moment and realize that Capitalism is an economic system, nothing more, nothing less. It's people that are evil. You make it sound like Socialism is so cuddly and pro-Green, but the Soviets and the Chinese are far, FAR worse on the environment than the US ever was. Communism and Socialism actually encourages inefficency, and that sort of thing is best accomplished through anti-environmental actions (plants running badly/dirty, etc etc.)

      If the sheep continue to give money to companies that continue to do bad things, whom do you truely blame?

    15. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      I may just be too much into darwinism, but if you're too stupid to read the contract that says, "Time Warner Cable can install remote administration on your system and digitally rape you every night before you go to bed, monitor your actions and buy 5-day trial accounts to porn sites with your credit card" then maybe you deserve for it to happen to you. Hey, someone's got to make money off the internet and be able to conduct market research. Might as well sacrifice the computer illiterate so that they leave us alone.

    16. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Sinistar2k · · Score: 2

      Evil? Wow, that's going a bit far for some cable guy installing software.

      I can just picture him leaving the house chuckling under his breath... "Stupid mortals. They know not what I have done!! BWAHAHAHAHA!!!"

      When the cable guy came to my house, I told him I didn't want all that stuff on my machine and he said he could record it as a self-install, which actually knocked money off the cost of installation.

    17. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by thales · · Score: 2
      " Please take a complimentary course on "social ethics and justice" and call ME in the morning."


      ROFLMAO
      Only a rabid leftist would dream of naming a course "social ethics and justice"! "Socalist Ethics" would be a better description of what to expect in that class, even tho' the term "Socalist Ethics" is an oxymoron.


      Expect a drawn rant of hatred directed at anyone who has more than the neurotic teaching the course, along with his wish that armed force be used to enforce his will on the population. That seems to be the norm for what is laughably called "social ethics and justice"

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    18. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by TibbonZero · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Scott, your ISP is not quite evil enough. You're semi-evil. You're quasi-evil. You're the margarine of evil. You're the Diet Coke of evil, just one calorie, not evil enough."

      --
      Tibbon
      tibbon.com
    19. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Casualposter · · Score: 1

      ID10T

      Examine the environmental cleanup that is underweigh in capitalist countries. Then go tour the former Soviet Union countries. Pay attention to the articles on the VAST amount of damage done to the environment by techniques in manufacturing, mining, and land use that make anything the "Decadent" Capitalist ever dreamed of pale in comparison.

      Capitalism works best when there is a free flow of resources and information is a resource. No human wants to live in a dangerous, horrible place, and will strive to make it better or move. Only in totalitarian systems where the populace and other resources are controlled by a central authority (regardless of democratic pretensions) do the detrimental effects of human lfe continue to destroy the environment.

      As to the shortsitedness of capitalism; that is not a systemic problem, but rather a lifespan problem. Were humans to live very long lives, our outlook would increase. Perhaps though, it would still seem shortsighted.

      --
      Creative Spelling Copyright (2002). May use without Persimmons
    20. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by merriam · · Score: 1

      Did you mean to say "what about the morals "? To judge from some replies, you appear to have started a thread for Alex Chiu followers.

    21. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by bwalling · · Score: 2

      This kind of crap is exactly what would NOT happen in a true capitalist system.

      The flaw in your logic is assuming that consumers have any idea that this is happening and that they would therefore choose a competitor that was not doing this. The reality is that even if there was competition, all of the companies would be doing this because less than 1% of people would care if they did.

    22. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      Now that you bring this up, corporations, as defined by U.S. law, are beholden to their investors. If the corporation fails to maximize returns for the investors through any legal strategy, then the corporation can be sued regardless of the morality of the strategy in question. This isn't a question of morality, but of law. Perhaps that's what needs changing.

      Corporate culture is what it is because it's designed that way. If you don't like it, petition for change. It's the only way.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    23. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "where economic conditions which in a capitalist economy would have been compensated for by a shortage of service instead resulted in the railways system being run into the ground unmaintained".

      This describes to a tee what happened with the british rail system- run into the ground unmaintainted. ever tried to catch a train. Ever paid the excessive faires, only to be met with stinking dirty, crowded, late trains, running a bumpy ride on potentially dangerous tracks, with non-working signals, drivers that are so poorly trained that they miss the ones that do work, and a customer service blanket information restriction.

      The wierd thing is- that happened after privatisation- which being the act of dividing the tracks among large companies(virgin for instance), is a purely capitalist method. Now I am to some degree a capitalist- I work as a pro-dev and expect to take money home for it- more than my local garbage collector does. I agree it has nowt to do with ethics or justice. The sad truth is that systems will be abused either way. The commune or the corporation would both be sucessful models if people were trustworthy... But how many of you would leave 5 grand on the side in your parental home? I bet most people dont even trust their family that much let alone someone else. This is the climate we live in..

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    24. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      What the poster has said equates to saying the "One Man- One vote" rule is not capitalism - which is entirely true. The idea of capitalism is fair competition in an open market. Therefore microsoft are attempting a communist coup with their practices. "You will all pay the microsoft tax equally, you will all use our software."
      Sorry to turn this into another microsoft dig- but I couldnt resist it.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    25. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by mvonballmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You shouldn't be embarrased for that post, it actually is insightful compared to other posts here. Most of the previous posts were of this vein:

      I'm an amazingly cool and frood computer dood, so I told the cable company to fuck off and they had to, so there! L00zerz!

      Yeah, cool.

      The point the previous post made was that there are a lot of people getting this quasi-manipulative software installed on their machines - pretty much without their knowledge. You explain this with:

      "99% of the people out there DON'T CARE that it's on there"

      I disagree. I think if they knew what it was, they would care. If you told them -- hey, can I install software that will watch your browsing habits in order to better target junk mail to your email address? -- then they would have the chance to say 'fuck off' too.

      But the deck is massively stacked because:

      1) They don't even know it's going on there
      2) They trust their installer because ostensibly he/she should know more about computers than they
      3) Even if they installed it themselves, they would click yes because they just want broadband and aren't aware (as many here are) to what lengths corporations will go to take advantage of them for profit
      4) EULA language is relatively advanced lawyerese -- again, it's beyond the comprehension of most, so they just assume they aren't getting screwed.

      The answer is not scorn for their stupidity, nor "let the company do what it wants, people don't care"...the answer is to use your massive hax0r skills to educate these beknighted souls.

    26. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      This is funny as hell. Some parts of me says this is what promotes my flatmate (a gamer but not a techie) to say all prgrammers and slashdot users are elitist scum, which is an image I do not wish to promote. Yet I find myself compelled to agree that it could start to scare the illiterate to get with the program and start to understand the machines they used. Like somebody posted on a recent thread "Which self-respecting redneck would by an ut with an engine sealed in and unmaintainable?".

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    27. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by wandernotlost · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Timeout...this is not evil. Someone sniping 14 people 'just because' is evil. Someone attempting to wipe a race off the planet is evil.

      Nice. Way to work that gratuitous sniper reference into a completely unrelated discussion. So what's you're criterion for being evil? Killing people? Killing people without justification? I think there's room for different levels of evil here. Score one for the pedants.

      Fact is, there is nothing illegal about them installing software on your computer with your consent.

      Telling someone that they need this software installed in order to use their cable modem and then installing spyware is not exactly with their consent. You might want to read the Constitution sometime. Start with the fourth amendment.

    28. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "over 85% of teachers are die hard liberals and some consider themselves socialist"

      hahaha - some consider themselves socialist eh?
      does that make them less able to teach "social ethics and justice"?
      Does it invalidate their opinions?
      What's your point?

    29. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Dean+Sas · · Score: 1

      uh huh thats great apart from russians system was very different to Marx's vision of Communism. Hence the phrase "stalinism"

    30. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think if they knew what it was, they would care. If you told them -- hey, can I install software that will watch your browsing habits in order to better target junk mail to your email address? -- then they would have the chance to say 'fuck off' too.

      Doesn't this give them the opportunity to watch your browsing habits to better target junk/spam also to your physical address and phone number, through correlation with your modem's EA/MAC address? Yikes!

      Are there prohibitions on them doing this? How about prohibitions on the third-party spyware doing this? All it would need is the number.

    31. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by ichimunki · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There are some problems with existing capitalist systems, especially in the U.S. where the "free" market is tinkered with almost more than certain "communist" economies. But thank you for the excellent description of capitalism. I've been saying for a while now that capitalism, used correctly could seriously increase the amount of democracy in the world... after all, public ownership of corporations gives investors exactly what we all think we are lacking: control over corporations.

      If more people would buy stock in companies (not mutual funds), they would actually get a vote in matters of import to the company that is exactly the same as the way they get a vote on the President or their Senators or whatever. And as a shareholder, there is *nothing* that can be done to prevent them from attending annual meetings and proposing wacky stuff like "maximum wages" for the CEO to be put on the proxy for a general shareholder vote.

      And now on-topic: I know when my cable guys came out to install TimeWarner (ick, but I had no other broadband choice), TW was encouraging self-installs at the time... probably to increase number of possible installs in a day. Fine with me, since all they really need to do is plug the cable "modem" into the cable wire, authorize the MAC address of the cable "modem" with HQ, and then it's up to me to get DHCP working, etc. Which was a breeze using Debian GNU/Linux. Had they insisted on mucking with my software I had a Mac set up for that.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    32. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attbi - has an outrageous pricing scheme for customers who use more than one pc at home. So basically you still pay 'extra' if you tell them more than one pc is connecting to the net.

      http://www.linksys.com/attbroadband/att_wireless .a sp

      "IP Addresses (Internet Protocol Addresses) for each additional computer that you are adding to your home network. This service is necessary to expand your high-speed cable Internet service to more than one computer. (One computer access service is included with the service you already have.) You will be prompted to order the IP addresses after you purchase your home networking equipment"

      Isn't it ironic linksys boasts being able to connect multiple pc's through one IP on their homesite?

      Even better, is their(attbi) policy on static IPs:

      http://help.broadband.att.com/faq.jsp?content_id =4 4&category_id=93

      "Unfortunately, AT&T Broadband cannot provide static IP addresses. Assigning IP addresses has become increasingly cumbersome because the number of computer users outnumbers the supply of IP addresses. To resolve this issue, network engineers implemented Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP). DHCP is being implemented so that more users can be supported with fewer IP addresses."

      They must have taken a few tips from an airline.

    33. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 2

      That is kinda funny about them teaching social ethics and justice...

      However my point is that a person should be careful or at least take the teachings of these professors with a grain of salt. Most make their living off of the private sectors taxes. Yet have never worked in it. Over the years they have hired and promoted "like minded" teachers and have all but eliminated other points of view. This is kinda weird since most promote "open debates". This has lead to their holier than though attitudes and since most have tenyear (mis-spelled), they don't have to worry about loosing their job.

      Does all this invalidate their opinions? Yes and no. Let me turn it around for you. Would you trust Adolf Hitler teaching a class on diversity? Now what if he hired and promoted most of the fellow teachers... Kinda reminds me of Sam Kinnison teaching that class on Vietnamn...

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    34. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking about what would or what would not happen in ideal, true capitalism is nonsense. There are tons of people who would argue that true, ideal Marxism is perfect. Does that make it any more practicable?

    35. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yes, yes, this IS offtopic.

      Actually, the biggest problem with the British rail system is that for most of the 18 years of Conservative rule it was starved of funds.

      Then it was given away to private companies. THEN it was run into the ground some more in the name off profit.

      It wasn't the world's greatest system in 1979, but it was a hell of a lot better than it ended up in 1995 - when it was sold off.

      And things only went downhill from there...

      Note that I'm apolitical. I don't think ANY of them are fit to be in power...

      q.v. the Hitchhikers book with the planet of lizards that govern the people, I guess...

    36. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hitler wasn't a Fascist, he was a National Socialist. Mussolini was a Fascist. There are significant differences.

      And what the Russians did wasn't Communism, at least as it was envisioned by Marx.

      Killing is not a part of either communism or fascism, but rather symptomatic of the particular individuals in power at the time the events transpored.

      I'm afraid neither system is inherently evil, any more than capitalism is.

      In fact, the problem with Hitler and Stalin's regimes were that both were ultra-authoritarian - not a requirement of any of the systems mention, and an authoritarian capitalist state is not a dichotomy - and both were... well... mad.

    37. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by (trb001) · · Score: 2

      Telling someone that they need this software installed in order to use their cable modem and then installing spyware is not exactly with their consent. You might want to read the Constitution sometime. Start with the fourth amendment.

      I really fail to see how you're bringing up unlawful searches and seizures into this. At a base level, the 4th amendment protects people from coming into your home and searching your belongings without a warrant. You can say 'No' to them installing software as easily as you can say 'No' to the police when they come to your door without a warrant. Would anyone out there, if a policeman came to the door and asked to search their home, allow them? Yeah, probably, a few would. The rest of us would really question why it was necessary and what they were looking for. They'd better have a warrant in order to search my home, even though I don't have, to the best of my knowledge, anything illegal that they could arrest me for. The grand thing about softare installation is that there's no warrant.

      I think there's room for different levels of evil here.

      I'll give you that, there is. However, I don't think evil is the word we should be using to describe this 'act'. Immoral would be about as far as I would go, and who are we laying the blame on? Cable companies, for all I know, have had requests to put software on customers' computers by the customers. In my experience with the non-techy folks (family, mostly), they aren't happy with a new installation of ANYTHING unless they can see some physical evidence on the computer...an icon on the desktop/taskbar/start menu, for instance. This software probably gives them that.

      So what's you're criterion for being evil? Killing people?

      Honestly, yeah. I think you'd be hard pressed to convince a jury that anything short of killing someone in cold blood or molesting children was evil. Misappropriating hundreds of thousands of your employees pensions? Horribly immoral and wrong, but not even that would I call 'evil'. Evil is a word that really describes the root of your personality, whether or not you do things to screw people over royally for fun. A cable company that provides a service and happens to make additional profit by recording your web activity anonymously (yes, most are anonymous) is surely not evil, they're still looking to give the customer what they wanted.

      --trb

    38. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      Yes, because capitolism can occur naturally in a system of people if left to their own devices. Communism takes a bit of effort (unless in very very small groups and capitolistic trading almost always still needs to occur between groups) to occur and weither true marxism is even possible is highly debatable as it doesn't take in humans natural tendencies while capitolism does.

    39. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by scoove · · Score: 2

      Though I concur with FatherOfONe's perspective on capitalism, I think he's heading down the wrong tracks on the view of the cable company:

      What the Cable company is doing is wrong.

      Not if the consumer signed up for it and bought it. Sure, you can skip the fine print, but you're still agreeing to it.

      They will probably get sued over this.

      Only by an inept attorney who disregards the "binding arbitration" clause of the service agreement. And then after it gets thrown out, the provider may wish to seek recovery for legal costs (which is in my service agreement).

      The person didn't agree to any EULA, AND probably more importantly the user didn't get the option to counter the contract.

      Sure they did (though I'm not a EULA fan; the service agreement we require people sign to order service does the job just fine). Counter the contract? Hahahaha... yea, I'm going to spend $2,000 in legal fees to get your $30/month business... not.

      Specifically they didn't get an option to do a fair negotiation with the company.

      There's the menu: which one would you like? Go negotiate with McDonalds over that Big Mac - they'll show you the door.

      Seriously, think it's unfair? Then go elsewhere... you're ignoring that at $5 for the combo meal, there is no margin for legal fees, negotiation, sales people, etc.

      This cable company is foolish to do this and it will come back to haunt them.

      Actually, they're just filtering out the loser customers they don't want. You've heard it before, but ~20% of your customers will cost you most of your expense. Fire them and focus on helping those you can help.

      but then they are a monopoly in that area... kinda like socialism...

      Then buy elsewhere. Or start one up yourself and take all of those 20% pain in the ass customers. It would only be socialism if someone held a gun to my head and made me provide service to the clueless 20% for the same price as the 80%.

      *scoove*

    40. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      Capitalism isn't short-sighted, Capitalists are. Capitalism is no worse than any other system, and certainly better than most.

      I think the problem is basic human greed, which is only reinforced by modern business schools, whose teachings seem to boil down to "Remember, always pillage before you burn, but rape is more romantic by firelight!" The focus on making things look attractive to people who essentially know nothing about the actual business (aka "stockholders") pretty much covers the rest of the problems.

      Here's my personal example: The company I currently work at is in the process of outsourcing customer service repair for some of our products. The outsourced work has a burden rate of around $120/hour and a 1 week average turn-around time. The internal customer service repair center has a burden rate of $82/hour and a 1 day average turn-around time. Clearly internal customer service repair is a lot cheaper and more efficient, and any true Capitalist would see that this is clearly the better solution. So, why is customer service repair being outsourced? Because reduced headcount looks better to stockholders, even though it carries a 50 percent price premium and dramatically reduces customer satisfaction.

      I hope that illustrates my point that what we Americans commonly mistake for Capitalism doesn't really put profits before people, but actually puts stock price before anything else.

      As for dollars before the environment, I think that is largely due to a failure on the part of the envirnmentalists. Clearly, there is value in preserving the environment, and the environmental movement has completely failed to present that value in anyhting other than esoteric terms. What is a more compelling arguement? "We must work to preserve these magnificent creatures", or "Conducting your business in an environmentally responsible way could be worth big money to you, here's how..."? Some of the most interesting work in environmental science is focusing on the later, but that's a very recent change.

      I'm no Capitalism cheerleader, nor am I even a Capitalism appologist, as I think my .sig clearly demonstrates. I do think, though, that it is much more useful to look at the details and determine the underlying cause and effect relationships than to simply spout anti-Capitalism rhetoric.

      I'm a big fan of social ethics and justice, but it's pretty useless if you can't present it as something that is of value to someone who doesn't believe in it.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    41. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I really fail to see how you're bringing up unlawful searches and seizures into this.

      The 4th is the "right to privacy" amendment:

      The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

      The key is "the right of the people to be secure in their...effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." This can be extended to the search/seizure of data about the person's, say, browsing habits, i.e. privacy.

      I think you'd be hard pressed to convince a jury that anything short of killing someone in cold blood or molesting children was evil.

      I think the dictionary would disagree:

      1. Having qualities tending to injury and mischief; having a nature or properties which tend to badness; mischievous; not good; worthless or deleterious; poor; as, an evil beast; and evil plant; an evil crop. 1913 Webster
    42. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fact is, there is nothing illegal about them installing software on your computer with your consent.

      HOWEVER.

      If we accept EULAs at face value, that clicking through a license agreement during an install process legally binds you to the terms of that license, then there's a big problem with the installer clicking through them for you (especially if you're not given the opportunity to read the license terms).

      Are you legally bound to the EULA terms if someone else agrees to them on your behalf? It's an interesting question.

    43. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Nyarly · · Score: 2
      Capitalism isn't short-sighted, Capitalists are. Capitalism is no worse than any other system, and certainly better than most.

      I'm not sure I entirely agree with this. I think Capitalism is no worse than any other economic system, and its chief virtue is that it doesn't aspire to be anything more than it is. As a system, it's too simple to be short or long sighted, but the successful strategies do tend to be short-sighted - maximize your profit and get out. There's a lot to say for capitalism, though, when compared to communism, where the ideals are so high, and the result is so disappointing.

      I tend to see the stock market as a natural and inevitable product of a capitalism, and that the fact that once a stock market arises, the greatest source of profit is stock price variance, means that "stock price before people" is in no substantial way different from profits before people. The benefit cycles in a capitalistic system work so hard againsts the general benefit, it's kind of scary.

      And as far as environmentalism being profitible, "Conducting your business in an environmentally responsible way could be worth big money to you, here's how..." How? "Here's how..." without a follow up is a pretty weak argument, in my opinion. The environmentalist urge is by nature a faithful and long-view one, and one which runs very counter to the mindset that adopts the capitolism-rewarded strategies, which are pragmatic and immediate. Honestly, there's less cost involved with ignoring the environment (without government intervention) and there's no immediately appreciable benefit to attending to it. So, why bother? Why care? Aren't the dollars that might go to cleaning wastes before dumping, or into extra tankers to allow for greater margins of error better invested into a "People Do." ad campaign to convince the public that you really are environmentally responsible? Maybe if the penalties were derived from the same risk equations that get used to make those decisions, then there might be changes. But that's hardly the capitalistic ideal of "Lassie Fair," eh?

      No, there really isn't anything better, that I know of. But what we've blows goats anyway. Better to be clear on that, for everyone to agree that, yes, our current economic system is rotten, and maybe some brilliance will find something better, than to defend the way things are.

      --
      IP is just rude.
      Is there any torture so subl
    44. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Capitalism is a short-sighted system that puts profits before people, dollars before the environment

      http://www.atlasshrugged.tv/meaning_money.htm

      I suggest you read the above, then check your premises...

    45. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2
      I don't think that you understand what capitalism actually is.

      Calling pure capitalism short-sighted isn't a bad assesment IMO.

      If capitalism is so great, why do all our technological advances come from government spending?

      If capitalism provides the fairest return for our dollars and our labor, then how do you explain this? Am I somehow implicitly giving my OK for $BIG_CORP to spend millions of dollars on PACs?

      Nope, the parent poster is right. Capitalism is deeply flawed, luckily we have a system in the U.S. that allows government to correct these flaws, and if more people would get out and vote we could have better control over these corrections.

      I place my trust in democracy far more so than capitalism. For instance the PAC's. On a democratic level we can tell our government to stop playing favorites to rich contributors. But can we, through our "spending power" tell the corporations to stop spending money on PACs? Not a chance.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    46. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      Stalking someone without their knowledge is evil, too. That is what these companies are doing and that is why the /. community is all up in arms about it. I ran a log on my system to monitor all outgoing activity from my PC overnight a few days after one of these so-called 'technicians' dropped off my cable modem and a CD with garbage on it. Being ever curious, I installed the CD's software, ran the logger via a firewall that prevented the escape of information, and went to bed.

      When I awoke the next morning I found that three particular programs were quite incistant about getting to the net to report their secret results about my activity (or lack thereof) on-line.

      There were 156 attempts in 14 hours (usually spaced a few minutes apart) to report to one IP address from three different programs. They are:
      1) Client Foundation
      2) Support.com Scheduler and Command Dispatcher
      and
      3) CorrectConnect MFC Application

      I ask you, how is this not evil?

    47. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by cioxx · · Score: 2
      You might want to read the Constitution sometime. Start with the fourth amendment.

      The right to bear arms?
    48. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling pure capitalism short-sighted isn't a bad assesment IMO.

      too bad we've never seen or practiced it.

      If capitalism is so great, why do all our technological advances come from government spending?

      like??? nuclear bombs? nerve gas? carnivore? eschelon?

      oh, you probably mean the things the government ordered from private companies and paid them money to develop for the government and for others? they're not actually the government - they're private enterprise.

      If capitalism provides the fairest return for our dollars and our labor, then how do you explain this [opensecrets.org]

      easy: opensecrets.org is something that would never be permitted in a command economy.

      and true capitalist systems would not have the government to bribe, just as bribing also takes place in command economies.

      i'm afraid you're dealing with a fundamental nature of human beings - some people will sell their influence, and other people will attempt to buy it. but to regard that as a component of capitalism is absurd and indicates the two semesters of freshman poly sci weren't enough to help you grasp these things.

      Am I somehow implicitly giving my OK for $BIG_CORP to spend millions of dollars on PACs?

      did you OK $CORRUPT_SENATOR to accept the money? funny, I don't see you complaining about $BIG_UNION either, even though if you look at opensecrets, you'll see that unions are the biggest and worst abusers of the system.

      it's one thing to have a private corporation deciding to use funds at the authorization of the corporation's owners for lobbying.

      it's an entirerly different thing to have money stolen from employees, forced to be union members (such as teachers unions - required in many states, and in the other states, nonmembership ensures you will not last very long in your job), and then take ALL of the money and give it to one party.

      so, you wanna talk about capitalism again? seems like you've never even met it nor tried to grasp what it is.

      Nope, the parent poster is right. Capitalism is deeply flawed, luckily we have a system in the U.S. that allows government to correct these flaws, and if more people would get out and vote we could have better control over these corrections.

      I place my trust in democracy far more so than capitalism. For instance the PAC's. On a democratic level we can tell our government to stop playing favorites to rich contributors. But can we, through our "spending power" tell the corporations to stop spending money on PACs? Not a chance.

    49. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be the 2nd.

    50. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by mav.rc · · Score: 1

      4) EULA language is relatively advanced lawyerese -- again, it's beyond the comprehension of most, so they just assume they aren't getting screwed.

      Maybe we should start by teaching people that when they see relatively advanced lawyerese, they're most likely getting screwed.

    51. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 2

      I am glad that we somewhat agree, but on the issue of the cable company getting sued. It will happen. Look at the number of people that have bought things that they "knew" where dangerous and then sued later because it wasn't spelled out enough for them. I am also willing to bet that the cable company didn't display that they were going to load spyware software on the persons pc in the initial contract.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    52. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Invidious · · Score: 0

      Socialism has been around since the dawn of time. There have been capitalistic aspects to most of human interaction, but the evolution of capitalism as a social system is a very recent thing.

      Most societies through time have been more socialistic than capitalistic, including many of the largest ones. And almost all of the smallest.

    53. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by afidel · · Score: 2

      4) EULA language is relatively advanced lawyerese -- again, it's beyond the comprehension of most, so they just assume they aren't getting screwed.

      Whenever I see Lawyerese I assume I AM getting screwed, otherwise why bother with lawyers?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    54. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by damiam · · Score: 1

      You might want to read the Constitution sometime. The right to bear arms is the second amendment. The fourth amendment concerns the rights of the government to search private property.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    55. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by gadb · · Score: 1

      The other thing to note about the EULAs is that you basically agree to them by signing with your Cable/DSL provider. The original poster was upset that the installer accepted all of the EULAs, without requesting input from him or his family. His family agreed when they signed the contract for that very first month with the provider.

    56. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by cioxx · · Score: 2

      It was a humorous comment (as in "right to bear arms to kill the EULA abuser a.k.a. the ISP dude")

      I know my Constitution, thank you.

    57. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      the successful strategies do tend to be short-sighted - maximize your profit and get out.

      Enron is an excellent example of why that is false. I would hardly call that a successful strategy, considering how much more money could have been made in the long term by operating in a sane manner, with the added bonus of avoiding the angry mobs.

      And as far as environmentalism being profitible, "Conducting your business in an environmentally responsible way could be worth big money to you, here's how..." How? "Here's how..." without a follow up is a pretty weak argument, in my opinion.

      Obviously there is a follow-up, that's why I put in the ellipses. However, it's different for every business. If you really want an example, check out the article on fish farms in one of the recent Discover issues. I'm not an environmental scientist, and I have no desire to be one, so it's not my place to make the actual detailed arguements. There are people who are doing it, though, and they are able to make compelling arguements without having to resort to fines or other penalties.

      If you think about it, though, it makes sense. Producing waste costs money. Waste represents inefficiency, which increases overhead, which reduces margins. A big part of being environmentally responsible, for many industries, is simply producing less waste.

      I think it's likely that as we examine things more closely we will find that the idea that it is more profitable to ignore the environment is just as flawed as the outsourcing example I gave in my earlier post.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    58. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      In h2g2? I am not sure I get the reference but we are definately descended from golgafrinchans.. After all most of our politicians are middle men between the public and anything worthwhile ever happening to the economy, public services etc at all....

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    59. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Nyarly · · Score: 1
      Enron is an excellent example of why that is false. I would hardly call that a successful strategy, considering how much more money could have been made in the long term by operating in a sane manner, with the added bonus of avoiding the angry mobs.

      See, the Enron execs missed the "and get out" part of the strategy. Seriously, though, Enron is actually an excellent example of what I'm on about. The Enron management was acting in the short sighted way that the reward structure dictated. There's a large risk-taking component to capitalism. Enron execs miscalculated the risk and got caught. I'm dubious about whether there's only one Enron, as it were. We just haven't heard from the rest of them.

      I'm not an environmental scientist, and I have no desire to be one, so it's not my place to make the actual detailed arguments.

      Except there a thousands of industries where it isn't profitable to be environmental. "It's not my place" is kind of disingenious, when there are a lot of industries where profitable environmentalism isn't a problem anyone has an answer to.

      If you think about it, though, it makes sense. Producing waste costs money. Waste represents inefficiency, which increases overhead, which reduces margins.

      While this may be true for some manufacturing, like die-cutting, waste doesn't always represent inefficiency. Petroleum distilation, or aluminum production, for example, both produce wastes that have no value. And it isn't like it's excess, that it's stuff that could be used; it's just there are parts of petroleum, for instance, that nobody has a use for and that are amazingly toxic. So, you can either store them forever (with the associated costs), do more work to break them down (or bind them up) into other wastes that aren't as toxic (with the associated costs), or just quitely tip them into a river, and let them dilute, which is cheap. Yes, someday there may be a technological solution, but who'll invest in the research to find it?

      I think it's likely that as we examine things more closely we will find that the idea that it is more profitable to ignore the environment is just as flawed as the outsourcing example I gave in my earlier post.

      Suggesting that we just need to look closer at the environmentalism issue without actually being able to address the problems it raises is so much handwaving. As far as how flawed your outsource example is - when the best route to personal gain is increase in stock price, spending 50% more on tech support to make yoour stockholders happy is an excellent decision, in the context it appears to have been made. But I think we both agree that it was dumb as far as the company itself was concerned.

      --
      IP is just rude.
      Is there any torture so subl
    60. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      Undoubtably there are more Enrons out there, and we have heard about a few, though nothing of that magnitude, certainly. But I still disagree that the strategy of the Enron execs was successful (I'm ignoring the "getting caught" part, since the White House seems to be making sure they get away with it).

      I'm coming to this conclusion based on these assumptions: (1) The goal of Capitalism is to amass Capital, (2) The one who amasses the most Capital wins. Based on these assumptions, we can define a winning strategy as the one that amasses the most capital.

      Donald Trump is a fine example of modern, misguided (IMHO) Capitalism. There is no doubt that his slash-and-burn strategy amassed a great deal of capital.

      An excellent counter-example is Bill Gates, who, though I loathe him personally, I consider to be a true Capitalist. He has stuck with his company, building it up to what it is today.

      Trump exemplifies short-term strategy; Gates, long-term. Whose strategy has been more successful? I think that's pretty obvious.

      Now, looking at Enron, I strongly believe that they would have made much more money, likely at least an order of magnitude more, by choosing a more long-term strategy. It's not as if Americans are going to suddenly stop using electricity, or even start using less overall, so I hardly think my belief is unfounded.

      "It's not my place" is kind of disingenious

      I don't think that's the case at all. Fist of all, I was presenting a highly generalized, hypothetical situation. It should be quite clear that when speaking to a Capitalist "save these magnificent creatures" is much a less effective arguement than "You can make more money by not destroying the environment". That was my entire point, and I never pretended that it was anything more.

      Indeed, it would have been far more disingenuous to try and present specific examples, since, as I have already stated, IANAES. However, I do know that there are environmental scientists who are doing the studies and proving that it is more profitable for certain industries to behave in a manner which also happens to have less environmental impact, and that many of these strategies revolve around reducing waste.

      I even pointed you towards a specific example. What more do you want?

      Petroleum distilation, or aluminum production, for example, both produce wastes that have no value.

      It's only a matter of time until a use is found for those wastes. In the mean time, though, it still makes sense to reduce the amount of waste produced. Waste still represents cost, especially if the waste has no value. Any way you look at it, that waste represents raw materials which can no longer be used. Waste doesn't just magically appear from nowhere, and the raw materials/catalysts/whatever that are now unusable waste cost something to obtain. Additionally, disposal costs money, even if you're just dumping it in the creek.

      Suggesting that we just need to look closer at the environmentalism issue without actually being able to address the problems it raises is so much handwaving.

      I may be waving my hands, but I'm at least trying to wave them in the direction of people who are actually finding solutions that are both effective and profitable. Don't take my word for it, check it out for yourself. It is being done!

      As far as how flawed your outsource example is - when the best route to personal gain is increase in stock price, spending 50% more on tech support to make yoour stockholders happy is an excellent decision, in the context it appears to have been made.

      I'm not so sure. The stockholders are still bearing that 50% extra cost, it's just hidden under the blanket of "Expenses". As a stockholder I would be much more impressed if they chose the strategy that costs less, since they would be demonstrating that they are being mindful of my money.

      I'm not sure why reducing headcount is so attractive to investors, anyway. Layoffs and outsourcing have always seemed like the thrashing of incompetent management trying to dig themselves out of the hole they dug, at least judging from the evidence of the 10-15 years I've been aware of such things. To me, that seems like a signal to sell, not to buy.

      Oh well, those who can, do. Those who can't major in Business.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  72. BANDWIDTH controled by firmware updates from ISP by Ozor · · Score: 0, Troll

    Most people don't know but bandwidth is limited by a firmware software update sent to your modem via the isp. A friend of mine is working on this problem to borrow more band from the isp. Also something that isn't known you can buy a cable modem and hook it up and get cable service for free. This worked on Comcast systems after the swtich from the @home service.

  73. Absolutely nothing by ColdGrits · · Score: 2

    When I signed up with my cable supplier, NTL here in teh UK, they arranged for the engineer to fit cable to my house. They asked if I wanted the enginer to install the modem or if I was happy to do it myself. I said I'd do it myself, they said "fine" and that was that.

    No software they tried to install, no software they tried to get me to install.

    but then again, given the cable modem simply plugs into an ethernet port, why shoudl there be any software required anyway?

    --
    People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
  74. a different experience ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wasn't around when the cable guy came to hook up the cable modem after we had relocated. I left instructions for my wife to have him hook up the modem, make sure it was live and get the sundry addresses. He asked what computer we wanted to install it on and she cheerfully lead him to the basement where sits the old beater PII box I use as a firewall. He turned on the old hard-to-read, saved-from-the-dumpster monitor and apparently said, "oh one of those" when he saw the fine text terminal login prompt. After that he scibbled down the addresses, made sure there were packets going being flung at the NIC and left. He was happy not to have to wrestle with another windows box, I was happy he wasn't wrestling with my network.

  75. as much as I hate at&t by AssFace · · Score: 2

    in my area (cambridge MA), there are two options. you can either have a cable modem, or not. but if you do, it is through media one - which is now AT&T.
    I can't stand them, but they are getting better after many a lawsuit against them (not that I'm suing them, but it is nice to see other people are).
    At least on the good side, when they come to install the crap, if you just tell the person you know what you are doing, then they will just leave all of the stuff and let you sign something to show that they were there and left the stuff.
    The rest you can do yourself, call in and get the hardware activated, and you are good to go.

    I've had DSL in the past here and it was like that too, although went on to die and I quit the service because the customer service was soooo bad.

    and there is no way I will ever ever ever go back to dial up at my home. no way. ever ever ever.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  76. One more thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I never saw a EULA while installing the Broadjump crap.

  77. get rid of it. by bi0s_sHiFted · · Score: 1

    Learn how (that is if you don't already know) to set up your network settings & such. then just remove their junk. My cable modem gets DHCP from my ISP. with 3 or 4 clicks all i have to do is "get IP automatically" under win. and select the DHCP otion under linux. not too hard eh?

  78. Adelphia's terms of service by timbck2 · · Score: 1

    When I had my Adelphia Powerlink service installed, the technician didn't want to touch my PC -- he asked me to sit down and change the settings (he told me most people don't like for a stranger to touch their computers). Since it already had a NIC, all we had to do was setup the SMTP server in Outlook (which I don't use).

    He also forgot to bring a Terms of Service agreement for me to sign (so I never signed one). However, the most recent bill I got from Adelphia says "By paying this bill, you agree to the Terms of Service ...". Would that hold up in court?

    --
    Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
  79. Sometimes they're just clueless by mktvr · · Score: 1

    The guy that came to install my [Comcast] cable modem ran this sequence:

    • log into XP under the first account on the list (an old roommate's)
    • drag an Internet Explorer shortcut to the desktop
    • set the IE homepage to http://www.comcast.net/
    • attempt to fiddle with network settings before realizing he's not on an administrator account
    • log in with the proper user account
    • ...drag an IE shortcut to the desktop
    • ...set the IE homepage to http://www.comcast.net/
    • ...

    Etc.

    Of course I use Opera, so all that effort was wasted... He didn't try to install anything, though.

    He was also rather nonplussed when testing the account to discover the auto-assigned password didn't work, and went out of his way to be surprised that I had already changed it.

    --
    People with pure hearts can go to a whole new world.
  80. roadrunner was ok by larsu · · Score: 1

    I've been involved as a customer (or friend of customer) at more than a few cable installs. Most of the time, I've had no problems explaining to them that I'll set the client side up myself, I just want them to get the cable working. I do have a couple of notes however.

    Every single time (except one), rr has been slow at registering the mac address of the cable modem with their dhcp server. Why Time Warner techs don't call this in to RR prior to the appt I'll never know, but they don't, and the cable never works until about 2 hours after they leave.

    Once, (on my home network no less) while I was fixing up some ramen noodles, the installer came across my linux box, and wiggled the mouse. When the mouse didn't make the screen turn pretty colors (the monitor was off), he reset the power to the box. I swear to god, if it still had a year uptime on it (i powered it down when i moved, rather than driving across town with it still plugged into the UPS just for brevity ;), i'd have rebooted his truck.

  81. Cox has offical DIY install by CustomDesigned · · Score: 2, Informative
    When I signed up for Cox cable, they had a choice of "Full Service" install and "Self Install". For the full service option, the technician installs all the spyware and adware for you, and configures your PC for the cable modem - with no firewall protection. The full service install is available for Windows only.

    Since I run Linux, I picked self install. It is $75 cheaper than full install, and the technician came out, refurbished all the cable connectors, turned me on at the hub, and checked the signal level at the cable modem. He then let me configure Linux and check that I could ping various places.

    You really can't argue with this policy. Some customers (most?) need the full service install. My only complaint with Cox is that they keep increasing the price (from $40/mo to $50/mo) and decreasing the upload cap (from 500Kbits to 200Kbits). The download cap is 1.4Mbits - T1 performance for a fraction of the cost.

  82. fake it by photon317 · · Score: 2


    If they are going to absolutely insist on touching your machines, just set up a partition with a fresh copy of Win95 or something, let them mess about there, and then destroy it when they leave. Or if you weren't pre-prepared for that, just let them isntall and then re-install your OS after they're gone. If you're running a Winbloze variant, you should be re-installing your OS every 2-3 months anyways just to clear the cruft.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  83. Re:Cable Moron by RadioactivePorpoise · · Score: 2, Informative

    I worked in the cable industry for 5 years as an internal systems administrator at a Systems design contractor. Most of those techs are trained on hardware that'd liquify your brains - installing software for some clueless customer is a very small part of their responsibilities.

    Some of you people just need to get over yourselves!

  84. The techs advised me NOT to by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

    2 cable installs (Cox and RoadRunner) and both times, the tech said "We're supposed to install this stuff, but you really don't want it". (I didn't anyway)

    They merely set up the protocols enough to get a signal, opened a browser and got to a random webpage. "OK...thats it. Here's the CD if you want to install it later."

  85. I've seen this by billmaly · · Score: 2

    When I had my first cable modem, it came with a CD that I was supposed to install, I never did. Naturally, the modem worked fine. Since then, I've had no software installed for a cable modem (NIC driver doesn't count). Recommend you get a HARDWARE firewall, and put it between the PC and the modem....I don't know that this will stop the tracking/reporting, but it won't hurt. And uninstall that dog ASAP!!!

    1. Re:I've seen this by PunchMonkey · · Score: 2

      Recommend you get a HARDWARE firewall, and put it between the PC and the modem....I don't know that this will stop the tracking/reporting, but it won't hurt. And uninstall that dog ASAP!!!

      Actually, it probably won't. Most people will probably just leave the firewall with it's default settings, which is great for blocking incoming traffic, but not outgoing.

      Oddly enough, Windows users are probably better off *with* a software firewall like Norton's. With Norton's, anytime a program attempts to access the net, it pops up a window asking you if you want that program to have net access or not. I don't think any hardware firewall out there has (or can have) this level of control.

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  86. Works both ways.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got my cable modem in mid-1999, and the installer guy noticed my collection of CDs. Next thing I know, he's asking me if I ever heard of a program called Napster, and said it was the best reason to own a cable modem. So he installed that (as well as the wrong driver disk for the network card, causing my throughput to be about 5% faster than a 28.8 modem ;), showed me how it works, and went on his merry way.

    Once we figured out the network driver problem, the rest was history. I wonder what his bosses would've thought had they known what was going on... (and it does bring up the same issue, in reverse-- if the cable company installed Napster on my computer in an 'official' capacity, what are the legal ramifications?)

  87. uninstall it & get back to the party by djeaux · · Score: 1
    Coulda, woulda, shoulda is about all you're getting here. The guy didn't have to install the stuff -- you coulda signed off for him, shoulda requested to install it yourself, yada yada yada.

    Just uninstall the crap the dude put on your machine. I went thru some heartburn with the PPoE software (self-install) for my DSL -- heartburn as in a complete HDD reformat & OS reinstall -- only to find that the #1 instruction for the router I plugged in was "uninstall any PPoE dialer software that came from your ISP"... In short, you may find yourself having to take all that garbage off anyway.

    Get everything cleaned up. A complaint to the cable company or (if they have a municipal "monopoly" as you say) to your city council about the privacy stuff might be in order, too.

    Then sit back & rock. That broadband will make you forget the hassles soon enough!

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  88. corporate america by getto+man+d · · Score: 1

    its sad that even your own ISP needs to take advantage of you and your computer. i am in favor on the "fake" comp, get a crap one and have them install their programs on that. the self install would be nice too. this just shows how greedy and low companies can stoop to make a fast buck. you could say they are tryin to help out the economy, but in essence, if we delete these programs...we could be called terrorists....:-)

  89. spy wear by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I always wanted those mission profile sunglasses with the autodestruct. Too bad you can't throw it away 1sec before detonation...

  90. questionable software by misterhaan · · Score: 1
    after a while i stop caring what's on my main windows machine because it's messed it self up enough that i need to wipe it out and start over again. i made sure to wait until the cable guy came to do his thing before wiping it out.

    on a side note, he had to collect a lot of information about my computer, including total hard drive space and free hard drive space. i don't know what they needed this for, but the cable guy concluded that i know a lot about computers since i had a total of 80 gig and had about 10% of it free

    --

    track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

  91. Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to let them install the software, and when I supervised for big 4 cable's HSD department on the east coast, I told users on the phone they don't need the software, of course at the time it was @Home and most wanted it, but I don't see the point. It's a waste of space and an invasion of your privacy, you paying/subscribing to the service, not spy-ware.

  92. cable modem service and EULA agreements by jorr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Besides just uninstalling that software, there are some things you could and should do. Check to see if your local city government has a liasion with the cable company. If so, my first step would be to let them know about what you experienced. As someone else mentioned, check the service contract to see what it mentions about allowing the cable company to make you a party to other agreements (EULA). Though it could happen, I doubt a court would allow it to stand if you were unaware of what the agreements were about. It would be the same as assigning the power of attorney. The idea of needing a demographic database to offset costs could be true but should have been stated. Companies should offer the customer a choice: pay x amount for the product or pay a smaller fee but allow them to gather and use marketing info.

  93. Charter by SirNAOF · · Score: 1

    Our cable guy asked us if we had a PC or a router...when he found out it was a Linux box playing NAT he said 'ok, I'll just use my laptop to test it then' and never installed or even gave us any CD's.

    All the better for us.

    Too bad half the world is less intelligent than the 'average person'.

    --
    JB - CAE UNIX Systems Staff

    --
    Jeremy Baumgartner
    1. Re:Charter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad half the world is less intelligent than the 'average person'.
      I have made that statement to several people I work with and some of them actually tried to argue against that point. Can you guess which half of the world I rank them with?

    2. Re:Charter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad half the world is less intelligent than the 'average person'.


      (160 (my IQ) + 80 + 80 + 80 (your IQ, and that of your burgerflipping coworkers)) / 4 = 100

      100 = average IQ = IQ of average person.

      So how many people have an IQ under 100? Is that half the world?

    3. Re:Charter by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      The half you're not in?

      Tell me, what's the average of 15, 15, 17, 19, 6, and 3?

      It's 12.5, in case you can't manage that.

      And, look, 2/3rds of the numbers are over it, and 1/3rds are under it. Not half.

      Now, guess what 'half' you're in? The stupid 'half' or the smart 'half'?

      100 is the average intelligence. It is not the median intelligence.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  94. They can turn you off if you uninstal! by olddoc · · Score: 5, Informative

    From this site: http://support.sbcglobal.net/legal/5071.shtml Is the following EULA language: # RIGHT TO TERMINATE NETWORK-BASED SERVICES: By using the Licensed Software, you acknowledge and agree that BroadJump and SBC Internet Services shall at all times retain the right to terminate any and all on-going network-based services that you receive pursuant to your use of the Licensed Software for any reason whatsoever, including without limitation your refusal to allow BroadJump and/or SBC Internet Services to install on your computer any upgrade or modification to the Licensed Software in the future. You better keep that 486 honeypot running with the Broadjump software!

    --
    Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
    1. Re:They can turn you off if you uninstal! by gorilla · · Score: 2

      He didn't refuse to have it installed. He simply removed it afterwards.

    2. Re:They can turn you off if you uninstal! by rebbie · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So, don't use any of their software and then you have nothing to worry about. Look what it says: "By using the Licensed Software..." If they had instead said "By using the network connection..." things would be a bit different.

      --
      On a clear disk you can seek forever
    3. Re:They can turn you off if you uninstal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't install it and agree. The CABLE GUY did!

    4. Re:They can turn you off if you uninstal! by edhall · · Score: 2

      Actually, if you read Section 4 of that part of the agreement ("# COLLECTED INFORMATION AND MODIFICATION OF SETTINGS") carefully you'll see that it is pretty specific as to what information is collected and uploaded -- just information relevant to the installation and network configuration. Nothing about whre you browse or other such information.

      As other postings here make clear, Broadjump is essentially an installer, and could be used to install just about any software as well as setting up your connection. So you should read the rest of the agreement carefully to see what the rest of its software load does. (I skimmed through it and couldn't find anything particularly suspicious, but you should check for yousrself.) It certainly would be a handy way to place spyware on your system, but as near as I can tell it isn't itself spyware.

      -Ed
  95. Cable Installer by Rushmore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I first got cable about 4 years ago the guy came over with his laptop and got everything working. Then I told him to leave the PC alone and I would take care of everything else. He said ok, I signed and he left. Easy as pie.

  96. Just say "NO" by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 5, Funny

    The cable guy came over to install a cable modem at my Dad's house. As I watched him do his stuff I noticed he was installing miniature cameras in my Dad's bedroom and bathroom. I know you don't need cameras for a cable modem to work so I asked if it was necessary. He said he had to do his list of things, and we had to sign that he did his list of things, otherwise he couldn't leave it with us to use. Since I can always remove the cameras, I agreed, but I noticed at the top of the camera was a small antenna. Doing a search on Google for 'Comcast minicam' comes up with some pretty scary stuff as far as what it does, like: 'Records toilet breaks and sexual escapades in order to enhance customer service' Now, how does this affect us? Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the cameras; the cable guy did. And is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have these cameras in their bedrooms is pretty high.

  97. Cable Software by nittibang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The true question is what RoadRunner installs on PC's that will not allow you to perform the standard install by yourself to save the fee.. I work for ISP and we have cable plant that works great. The average person can use our software to install our package and get up and running providing the cable techs have installed the right filters on the lines.. When I visit my aunt & uncles house to do their manual install of RoadRunner I am unable to resolve any DNS no matter what I do to the Win98SE machine... I do the normal kicking around of the computer and software and still nothing.. Hell I even tried getting my Linux Laptop to resolve DNS...... Nothing... I could ping by ip all day long just not get DNS... It was late I was tired so i told them to call RoadRunners techs... My cousin said the guy was there maybe 5 minutes and it was up and running...... He told my cousin that I must not have known what I was doing.... Hahah let me talk to RR's technicians who have been trying to force me a new ipaddress for the last year and a half.... :-) Anyways What software did that moron put on their computer that allowed them to work so fast?? Mind you they got charged something like $24.95 for the install..... has me boggled and mad :-)

  98. hmm by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

    Cox cable has a self-install kit that you can use, which is a little cheaper than having someone come out and do the installation. You can then just throw all of the software away, since it also comes with a small sheet of paper that details the settings you need to make for accessing the network and email/news/etc. When they started sending out the software (when they transitioned from @Home), I installed it on a test system to see just what was getting installed, and then removed everything that was wasting space, system resources, and bandwidth. The worst part was that it installed an old version of IE and Outlook Express (IE5.5 at the time), which should be obvious candidates for tossing out the window. I can just imagine the level of security vulnerabilities for Cox customers when their software package will install old versions of some of the most insecure software on most people's machines, even if a newer version is already in place.

    --
    -PainKilleR-[CE]
  99. Well ... by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

    Why would you let him install anything ???

  100. verizon DSL by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With Verizon DSL, i can either connect with my gateway/router with PPPoE, or through a standard WinXP network connection. They sent a CD to use for setup, but I uninstalled their software and it works great otherwise.

    Don't give these techs a hard time, they have to assume that you're a beginner and they probably need to install certain software by contract with some other software company (as a previous post supposed). We've all been support techs at some time in our lives. Just tell him you'd be happy to sign the agreement without him installing the software, and that way you both win as he can lower his average time-spent-per-incident rating.

  101. Just another reason why I use DSL by DeadBugs · · Score: 2

    Now I know it's not available in all areas but...

    The company I am currently using (Directv). Has a FAQ where they encourage things like using Linux, using a router and setting up your own website. They also provide a static IP address at no additional charge.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:Just another reason why I use DSL by niall2 · · Score: 1

      Here here...only problem is then you have to deal with the Phone Company.

      I wanted to go with DirectTV's dsl...good company good performance and good deal. However, here in Colorado right around the corner from their company headquarters our phone service is provided by QWEST and directdsl will not deal with QWEST at all.

      Got a Speakeasy account setup for 20 bucks more a month (with slightly more on the account). However now,with the installation finally working a MONTH after the inital estimate (all due to the phone company dragging their feet), I understand why DirectDSL doesn't deal with QWEST.

      Anyone else out there want to start a ILAC Chapter 11 pool?

      --
      Today is a gift. Save the receipt.
  102. What if you weren't running Windows? by Rushmore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What would he do then? I would tell him to hook up the cable, let me sign and then he can leave.

    Maybe what you were signing said that you agreed to all of those EULA's that has clicked on your behalf?

  103. I guess this is a lesson to be learned... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

    Firstly, this is extremely sneaky way of generating lots of market information about your customer base... (now we see one of the many ways that cable companies plan on making back their money for shelling out billions to deliver broad band...)

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  104. Don't Know No Nothin' 'bout That by RoscoeChicken · · Score: 1

    The installers who delivered my cable modem did a great job of setting up the physical connection -- running a line through my attic to the home office during a Florida summer. However, they were clueless about anything beyond the ethernet port on the back of the modem.



    I received a "do it yourself" kit and a phone number to call if I needed help. They did not want to go anywhere near my PC.


  105. Some are good, some not. by topham · · Score: 2

    Just had shaw install cable modem service this weekend.

    It went great, they saw my spraling collection of computers and decided they didn't want to install software. :)

    We made sure everything worked before they left though. (Although, I didn't show them my wireless network up and running, that was 2 minutes after they left. :)

  106. Not an Issue by Marcus+Erroneous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just had Charter Pipleline service installed and spent the weekend reconfiguring the network and setting up the router. The guy that came out was very cool about it and very knowledgeable. The only thing he needed to do to the machine was reconfigure the network settings so that they would work with the cable modem. Other than doing what he needed to, he didn't try anything funny or out of line. Some cable modems hook directly into the pc and may require a driver for the usb connection. Some providers want to put their browser on and/or reconfigure yours so that their page is your default home page.
    Charter, while not everyone's favorite service, has been very cool about helping me reset my hosts file on the cable modem and trying to see my router to help me trouble shoot the system. Their official policy is that they don't support networks which makes you on your own if you have trouble. In practice I've found that if you know what you're doing and the techs aren't swamped at the time, they'll work with you and tell you what they're seeing from their end and give you some pointers. Just don't expect them to walk you through it.
    Bottom line is that there really is no need to install anything other than maybe a driver for a usb connection to the cable modem. I'm not impressed that people that don't know any better are being taken advantage of by people like your provider. I can only hope that someone does that to their mom, dad, brother or sister sometime.

    --
    You must be the change you wish to see in the world - Ghandi
  107. Our installer ran cable to our network closet by phpsocialclub · · Score: 1

    We had Road Runner installed and not only did our installer run cable to our little network closet and hook up the modem to the router, he came back later and ran our own line from the pole to our place, when there was too much signal loss.

    Granted this was Business Class service, but we were paying for only one computer.

    I think everyone needs to remember that the desicions to install software is made by executives and not the installers who are simple contractors.

    Just tell them you do not want the software and get over it.

  108. What about Satellite modems? by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 2
    While we're on the subject...

    What about Satellite modems? Direcway's two way system has this "Direcway client" software that appears to be necessary for the two way connection to work at all (ie if it's disabled or turned off, the net connection goes down). And since the connections from the satellite modem is a USB, there doesn't seem to be any way to use the Linksys router (that we bought before the installation intending to use as a firewall and to network the two PC's) as anything more than a glorified hub.

    Am I wrong? Is there a way to do this? Anybody got any thoughts>?

    1. Re:What about Satellite modems? by Yablo · · Score: 1

      back at my old office, we had satellite internet through starband. we had to install some retarded client software as well just to be able to use the damn thing.

      note: satellite sucks ass. too expensive, bitch to configure, and infinitely shitty pings. (i couldn't ping google in under 800ms.)

    2. Re:What about Satellite modems? by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 2
      I agree that it sucks, but if the alternative out in "27500 feet from the CO, and a signal splitter in the wire, so DSL is right out" world that is so rural that the cable companies won't even touch it for tv service, never mind cable modems, is a 28.8 dialup that never gets above 16,6 (courtesy of the before mentioned signal splitters)...whatcha gonna do?

      Thusfar the service isn't hideous...a little slow to start getting the file, but once it gets going...ZOOM! (Latest full version of netscape in a hair under a minute). I'm just curious if I could get rid of that annoying blue box on the taskbar...apparently not.

    3. Re:What about Satellite modems? by 95_gst_al · · Score: 1

      you can setup a linux mahcine as a firewall/router and run the network connection out from the linux machine from the network car to your other pc or a hub.

      --
      When all else fails, piss on it. At least you will feel better in some kind of way.
  109. Do what I did! Run OS X... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2
    is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have this software on their computers is pretty high."

    You could buy a PowerBook G4 like I have...The kid was so amazed that I Didn't have a Windows PC, he actually asked me if my Mac was compatible with TCP/IP! His Macintosh knowledge was SO out of date he thought it was only capable of Appletalk...

    Anyway, I gave him a crash course in networking macs via TCP/IP, and at the end I had made another convert...

    Me: "Okay, so you go into System Preferences, click this drop-down menu, select "Ethernet adapter", click DHCP, and click Apply Now. That's it."
    Him: "Don't you have to restart the machine?"
    Me: "Nope."
    Him: "Wow, that's 100 times easier than what I have to do for a PC!"

    Gotta' love that...
    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:Do what I did! Run OS X... by Creepy · · Score: 2

      geez - that tech was ignorant - Win2K and XP (and usually NT) don't require reboots either.

      I had OS X and SUSE PPC linux dualboot (actually also 7,8,and 9, but I rarely use those) running on the machine I wanted to use ('cause it had a free PCI slot for my extra ethernet card [firewall]), and neither was supported by AT&T @Home, only Win95,98,2K and Mac OS 8-9. The tech (who actually was a Linux guy himself) set the machine up using MacOS 9 (he was required to do so to "authenticate" the ethernet card), and then let me strip all the relevant information and converted it to linux/OS X, deleting all the crap he installed. I'm now breaking a small chunk of the contract, though - No servers - bah! No NAT'd LAN? bah!

    2. Re:Do what I did! Run OS X... by idomoggie · · Score: 1

      I used Qwest whose tech installed the ethernet card and configured the setting to DHCP on the PC. Previously, I had Qwest DSL which I installed myself neglecting to install their customized browser, etc. as customized browsers crash more anyway. The PC has since been reformatted and the HD changed out and it still works fine without any undesirable software. The iMac was even easier, on OS9, he set it to DHCP and it was up and running. When I got an iBook, I did what you did and haven't had any problems connecting. I have firewalls, ad blocking, etc. on my machines and all works fine. I can disconnect the ethernet, go to dial up, and back, all without rebooting in OSX, works perfect. I do get a lot of junk mail from Cox wanting my business but as they use BroadJump, no thanks. Yahoo's broadband service, SBC, AT&T, Sprint and a bunch of others use their service too. See. There is no reason for a tech to install anything in OSX anyway, plug in and it works.

  110. Write your own EULA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which states that all the cable company EULAS are signed by someone else, on behalf of the cable company, and that you are not aware of their content.
    Then make the cable guy sign it before letting him doing anything to your machine.

  111. Vote with your pocketbook by buzzdecafe · · Score: 1

    This is exactly why I aborted a cable install at my house. They wouldn't just tell me the DNS IPs I needed to get online, they insisted I install their crapware. I won't mention the name of the company, but it rhymes with BAY-T-&-T. I refused, and got DSL instead through another co.

    The DSL co. (rhymes with TESS-B-C) also wanted me to install their crap, but they were willing to just give me the info I needed to get online without it. So I'm online with them instead.

  112. reboot to get new IP? by gosand · · Score: 2
    (god forbid they should check to see if you're running on 2K/XP which doesn't need to be rebooted to renew DHCP)

    Dude, Win98 doesn't even need to be rebooted to renew DHCP. Winipcfg resides in the c:\windows directory, and you can release and renew your IP using it.

    I have Earthlink DSL, and I got the self install kit. Once I used their software to connect and activate my account, I had my Linux firewall up in about a day and haven't used their software since.

    People laugh at me when they find out I have Win98, but it is stable enough for me to boot it up and play games on, which is all that machine gets used for nowadays. If you upgraded to Win2k or WinXP, why am I the idiot?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:reboot to get new IP? by gorilla · · Score: 2

      winipcfg even existed for win95, and could do the same.

    2. Re:reboot to get new IP? by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      and good ol' ipconfig at the command line on NT4/2k/XP. I don't really understand why winipcfg didn't make it to 2k, but the command line's good enough for me.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    3. Re:reboot to get new IP? by (startx) · · Score: 1

      winipcfg? wuss. real men use ipconfig /release and ipconfig /renew starting with 98 :-)

  113. So this is the where I get to brag about my WISP by lww · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Every time I hear another Cable/DSL horror story, I thank the Rebel Alliance for mesanetworks.net, my WISP. 1mbps up/down, do whatever you want as long as you don't exceed your 10GB/month limit (or pay extra per mb). Static ip's, 30ms ping to their dns, life is _good_

    Okay, before you flame me being lucky by owning a home in the right place, a decent ISP was one of the criteria I had in buying our new house...

  114. Use Linux by lightweave · · Score: 1

    My subject line may be a bit flamebating but I mean this seriously.
    When I got my modem I also got the installation CD without any information on how to connect to the server. Everything was covered by the software already. I didn't install this of course because I'm using a linux server to connect to the web acting as gateway for all my family members. I phoned the hotline and told them I need the contact information because I'm using linux. They refused first and told me that linux is not suppoerted. I told them that I don't need support I just need the information I should have gotten anyway (like DNS and such stuff). Then they said they will send me a tech who will install it and I told them that I refuse to let their tech doing any adjustments to my linux installation. After another discussion they finally gave me the information I needed. It sounds easier than it actually was because it took quite some discussions and multiple phone calls with their organization until they gave in but it worked.
    So you need to bother them some time and they will give in. After all you can always go to another provider. It's not as if there is only one on the market. Nowadays it's a bit easier because linux is now recognized and I, at least, don't have to explain anymore that there are people using something else then Windows.

  115. They left with beer! by smnolde · · Score: 2

    I had scheduled for the cable modem install the day before I was to leave town for a business trip. They called the afternoon of the install and tried to back out... the next install date they had open was something like a week later when I was gonna be out and I wasn't about to let anyone install anything on my computers.

    So I begged and pleaded and threatened (in no particular order) and they agreed to come out the next day.

    The next day arrived, and one guy was there to climb the pole and the other was there to do the networking stuff. Immediately they notice I had the wrong cable in my house and rewired it. They did it fast and cleanly, too. Nice job.

    I gave the keyboard jockey my temporary win95 partition to play on, he did his thing, rebooted, verified access and was pleased. So was I.

    As a gesture of gratitude I offered them a beer. The keyboard jockey agreed and all was well. The pole climber politely declined. Both were good guys and professional.

    After they left, I rebooted in linux and set up lunix. Ran great. Now I run FreeBSD. Runs better.

  116. AdAware? by grub · · Score: 5, Informative


    Perhaps the good people at Lavasoft could add this kind of scumware to their list of Naughties?

    Just a thought.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  117. ATTBI en Mass by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Guy just handed me a disk to install. Didn't work on XP Pro. Called up ATTBI, they had me register the cable modem via their web site and set up on their proxy (which proxy I promptly dumped when I got off the phone). Didn't install anything else. I probably didn't even have to worry about hiding my Linux boot disk.

    1. Re:ATTBI en Mass by garcia · · Score: 2

      you have to dump the proxy. It's only for registration purposes. Otherwise you will get the error "you are being blocked by the SAS proxy".

      They have NO proxies, in fact, they prefer that you don't use any at all (even your own).

  118. The installer just backed away in fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when I mentioned that my PC used BeOS. There had already been a truck out to install cable to the room so all I needed was the cable modem from the installer. I used my own NIC, not some $2 crap card.

  119. Some replies by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Have a bogus bathroom for him to install his camera in, which you can leave "unused" 'til you need to call support when you can shit in that bathroom if needed.
      • More amusing would be sending him to your outhouse. Let him try to figure it out. :)
    • This is why I always opt for the self-install option with any ISP. I don't even like my wife watching me take a shit, nevermind some complete stranger. (Side note: Yes, she does have her own bathroom. So there. :P)
    • Take them to small claims court and sue them for the time you spent removing the cameras.
    • They use 802.11 to transmit their signal to the nearest spy truck. To find out exactly what they're doing hook up an 802.11 hub and analyse the traffic.
    • If you're going to use their product, then you have to play by their rules. Forget about the fact that the installation guy might not be following the rules, and that as a monopoly service they are highly regulated by the government. Just bend over (for the camera) and take it.
    • Tell them your policy does not allow anyone to install cameras in your house without passing an extensive personal background check, signing a non-disclosure agreement, and obtaining a million dollar bond payable to you upon breach of contract. Ask him for his personal address and phone number so that you can contact him when the background check is completed, and have him fill out a form giving you his social security number and permission to use it for the purposes of obtaining the background check.
  120. What happened to Ad-Aware's website? by emil · · Score: 2

    I would say that the first place to start is Ad Aware to remove the spyware, but www.lavasoft.nu seems to be down. I haven't been able to get a refupdate in quite awhile.

    1. Re:What happened to Ad-Aware's website? by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Actual Website is www.lavasoft.de which is still up and running just fine.

      --
      WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    2. Re:What happened to Ad-Aware's website? by Zocalo · · Score: 2
      www.lavasoft.nu seems to be down

      Try http://www.lavasoftusa.com/ instead. I'd have to agree on the spyware detectors though, run your favorite after any software installs that you don't trust implicitly. And that's all of 'em expect for those you coded yourself, right? I also run it once a month or so in case anything slipped through the net.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    3. Re:What happened to Ad-Aware's website? by alcmena · · Score: 1
    4. Re:What happened to Ad-Aware's website? by Elivs · · Score: 1

      My cable modem install guy saw I was using linux and said that I had to configure it myself. He gave me the IP/mask/dns/gateway. After he had finished unpacking and plugging in the modem to the cable he asked if he could see how to config the linux system...

      I pointed out that I had done it while he was pluging in the modem, and then took him over the process for a few mintues. He was quite interested and said that was trying to learn linux.

      Quite typical for ISPs around here. They don't mind what you connect with, but they can only suport windows and apple.

      Elivs

  121. Trojan software? by Sabbath.sCm · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, I went to some friend's place to fix his computer, something with outlook password. I figured I had to change the POP3 password which I had to do through a web interface.
    The thing is, I called the cablemodem ISP so they would tell me where and how. The guy told me to reboot the computer. He somehow shut down the cablemodem himself, without me touching anything (we were on the phone) and then he told me to run IE and that a page should show up with a form.
    When I ran IE, somehow he managed to change the home page of my IE to the so-called password change form!? I was really scared at this point, he was changing the configuration on the computer remotely?! Hmm...

  122. RR installed a virus on my co-workers PC! by Ken+Williams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    yep, thats right. when the cable guy came to install Road Runner at my co-workers house, he said he had to install some software. one of the things he installed was a very well-known virus (can't remember the name now) that destroyed everything on the hard drive. before nuking the HD, it also emailed copies of the virus to everybody in his address book - that doesn't look good when you are an infosec professional! my co-worker had to reinstall the OS, lost alot of data, and then realized after the reinstall that he didn't need any RR software anyway to use their cablemodem service. RR did nothing at all to compensate him.

    My experience with RR has been great on the other hand. I never let them touch a thing. And they are fine with that. They just want to get out of the house and on to the next call.

    --
    -- ken williams
    1. Re:RR installed a virus on my co-workers PC! by buysse · · Score: 1

      An "infosec professional" who runs Lookout? Please....

      --
      -30-
    2. Re:RR installed a virus on my co-workers PC! by TKinias · · Score: 1

      An "infosec professional" who runs Lookout? Please....

      There are many who are compelled to use it by the suits. It's not always the user's fault.

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    3. Re:RR installed a virus on my co-workers PC! by buysse · · Score: 1

      I know and understand this. I was making a joke. :-P I guess that jokes do closely resemble trolls...

      --
      -30-
  123. Good experience by will_die · · Score: 1

    Last place I lived I had cable set up Adelphia, the installer knew what he was doing. I had two computers; a linux server, and a windows client game machine, normally hooked up in a small home network, disconnected for this install. Because of thier install limitation I just had them hook up the windows machine. He used my existing network card(he offered to use this first, and then switch the card if he could not get it to work), and installed the cable modem software so that he could do configuration test, he had a checklist of some other software(anti-virus, newsreader, browser, etc) which I told him I did not want, he allowed me to sign off as not being installed. Seeing my other computer and hub he offered to hook that all up, but I said I prefered to do it myself. He then gave me an extra sheet with all the default news server name, NIS server, etc, all the stuff you could pull from his setup, but nice to have outside of the machine. Since he had not needed to use a network card he offered me one of the types they use, so I took one of thoses 10/100 USB connectors from linksys.

  124. Yet another reason to use Linux. by MrEfficient · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The guy didn't install anything on my computer. He got as far as mousing over to the K menu and then stopped. I went ahead and told him it was Linux at that point and he let me take it from there :-)

    I gave him a couple of RedHat CDs and sent him on his way.

    --
    Check out AbiWord.
  125. Kick him out of the house next time! by grantedparole · · Score: 2, Funny
    I noticed he was installing something called Broadjump Client Foundation. I know you don't need software for a cable modem to work so I asked if it was necessary. He said he had to do his list of things, and we had to sign that he did his list of things, otherwise he couldn't leave it with us to use.

    This would have prompted me to kick him out of the house and demand that they give me a self starter kit.

    G.

  126. Hahahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this up +Funny, because when you think about it, it truly is hilarious.

    It works on so many levels.

  127. What Software Do Cable Installers Place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing. I told Roadrunner I was running Linuux, so they just installed the cable modem and left everything else to me.

  128. Opt-Out (Kinda) by waldoiverson · · Score: 1

    Mediacom, in Iowa, gives you the full install package and at the back of their license and "user guide" book, there is an opt-out form. It should be noted that this is not the same as an uninstall option. I assume they just remove your computer/modem/ip from their list. They even include a generous 30 day timeframe for you to find the form. Thankfully, I was insistent and the lovable Cable Guy left my free of their software. Now if only my upstairs neighbor would come down and ask to use my shower because her's is broken (movie reference).

  129. Cable install by cptgrudge · · Score: 1

    I installed the cable modem myself. It used to be that you could call up and give your MAC address, and everything would run fine. Now they have software which "does it for you", and only works on Windows or MAC. No linux support. Unacceptable.

    They make like the software is needed to connect to your cable connection, but it isn't. All I had to do was put a temp windows OS on, and once I could connect over the cable line, I put IPCop on the machine and used the same NIC for the connection. It's worked fine for 3 months so far.

    --
    Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  130. when my cable modem went in.. by archen · · Score: 1

    Reminds me when the cable guy came to my apartment to install it. I already had a network card installed so there wasn't too much for him to do. But apperently he wanted to set the browser startup page to be THEIR homepage. He looks around the desktop for a minute (I only have 4 icons there anyway), then he looks around the start menu (only around 10 icons). Finally he says, where's internet explorer? Finally I just dig it out of "program files" for him and he sets the page. Every 4-5 months when I need to use IE for some reason I sort of get a laugh and remember that he did that when I see the page load. Imagine that, someone using a DIFFERENT browser.

  131. no software install here by (startx) · · Score: 2

    The more of these horror stories I here, the more I like fidelity. I read the entire AUP, and there's prohibiting servers, I don't have any ports blocked, and they didn't install any software. The "tech" hooked up the modem to the wall and my ethernet card, I showed him how to start mozilla from the kpanel, and he was happy to see my homepage popup. 3 cheers to fidelity for not trying to restrict me in any visible way.

  132. Rogers cable did same by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

    Back 3 years ago when rogers installed cable in my house, besides leaving a nice hole in my just finished computer room wall (we got the net free for a month and the 150 install charge waved for that moron) we also got a few fun pieces of software. The guy was sopose to come in the afternooon when I got home and well he came in the morning meaning no one who knew anything about computers was home and no one home knew we had a spot already in the wall for the cable o go to. But checked up on the software, one was a cliend that would send weekley info of what web pages you viewed (don't rember name) the other I beleave was for tech suppport allowing them to take control of the pc. Neadless to say after reading the contract, I found nothing int here saying we had to run this well unwanted software so it was quite quickealy uninstalled. That and the pc was scedualed for a format the next week just to be on the safe side.

    As far as I am concerned what they did was illegal, we did not sign for that software, and it can be considered a invasion of privacey. But at this point what well you do besides bitch at them over the phone. But someone running a home buisness having the software could end up finding rogers knows a little more aout his buisness then anyone should. And I see that as a major issue. Now on a further note I know of friends who have had rogers installed around the same time and where present during the install to find they never receaved this software. But random people did have it installed, odd eh.

    o god, there is a ass inn the room, o wate its just billy gates

  133. Use a PC from the Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the folks from the cable company told me that that they had to install the software, I told them that all I had was my laptop from work and I'd have to check with them if they could install it or not. They promptly refused stating that they weren't allowed to install their software on another companies PC.

  134. They just need PPPoE.... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    The only software that DSL needs is Point to Point over Ethernet (PPPoE) software that they use for account managment of users/hosts. Since its not a normal piece of software (well it is now becomming so), it needs to be loaded. I can easily see this being integrated into operating systems so that you don't need to install it seperately.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    1. Re:They just need PPPoE.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WinXP has it.

  135. Re:Cable Moron by jon+doh! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    just because a cable installer knows "A", doesn't mean he's familiar with "B".

    i used to work at a phone company and the product managers there could talk to death about frame relay lines, phone switching equipment, etc, and they really knew what they were talking about. but they couldn't figure out how to log into their machines or how to change their password.

  136. Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mine does. However, in practice this just means that when I call Tech Support, they won't help me to configure dhcpcd or set up IP Tables.

    Admitedly, when the installer came I had installed Win95 on a spare partition and overwrote my lilo prompt so as not to spook him, but these days I have no problems with telling the Support people I'm running Linux ("No, I really won't re-install my network drivers, I'm running Linux...")

    1. Re:Indeed by NetSerf2000 · · Score: 1
      The cable company technicians are always damned quick to turn around and say Ohhh... your TCP/IP settings are faulty and need to be re-installed.

      They tried to say this with my friend (see this reply...) and I had only just installed Windows 2000 on his computer. So I knew that there was nothing wrong with the computer. Turned out it was their dodgy network card.

      The 2 technician who came out, tried the old "re-install your network drivers" with me and I told them to look for a hardware fault.

      I was right in the end... and they sure looked stupid...

      --
      *** I had a .sig, but then I got a life ***
  137. I know where you can put your social nonsense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you haven't noticed, social groups are not capable of ethics, and you cannot mete out justice to groups -- only to individuals.

  138. Broadjump home by Mac+Beckett · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's Broadjump. I found it through Hotjobs' listings for Canada, but it's just www.broadjump.com.

    Mac
  139. I get SO sick of this argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or...
    you could look at it like this:
    I spent a hell of a lot less time installing/configuring Linux than I did installing/configuring/searching for spyware/searching for viruses/resinstalling/configuring/searching for spyware/searching for viruses/reinstalling/configuring...

    You get the idea.

  140. Their techs appreciate techs by ronmon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only time my DSL provider (Bellsouth) has had to send a tech out was to replace my fried Alcatel 1000 about a year and a half ago. I've handled my own installations of dialup and DSL with them for the last 4 years. They are quite Linux friendly though they do not support it.

    He was prepared to do a normal windows installation when I showed him my router and firewall setup. We plugged in a couple cables and bang, it was running. He was very happy to not have to deal with all the extra crap. "Wow, that's Linux? Cool.", he said. Probably his easiest call ever, total 15 minutes 10 of them me showning him how feature-rich Linux is.

  141. They just need the MAC address of your modem by Kent_Franken · · Score: 2

    I have AT&T Broadband. The only real thing that their software does is register your modem's MAC address. (The rest of the software they install is not necessary).

    Until the MAC address is registered, the only place your browser can go is their Modem MAC address registration page (so you could bypass the software installation and just go there and register the MAC manually if you knew what to do).

    I had a spare PC and let them do whatever they wanted to it. After they left, I reformatted the hard disk and put that PC back in storage. Then I simply installed my Linksys wireless router and everyone was happy.

  142. Good fun by prsabc · · Score: 1

    I am getting mine installed on friday, for the entertainment of myself I will be sure to have a relic there for them to install upon, maybe something that doesn't even work, what fun... Hmm I wonder why the cable company is always 2 hours late probably cause of people like me...

  143. Idiot Cable Modem Installers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being that my brother and I had already setup an IPX network between the computers we had(that 40ft nullmodem cable sucked for Doom!) we bought a cheap NIC and put it in one of the computers downstairs. Brother told the tech guy not to touch anything, but when he went to the bathroom the tech did -something- and ever since the NIC has been dead, we had to go out and buy a new NIC and they wouldn't even pay for it. Granted, we didn't make a big deal since it was like $15, my brother made SURE the tech didn't get anywhere near the computer. (This was @home, switch to Cox.net blah blah )
    Get 'conversion' kit maybe a week before the switch, we also bought a cable modem that was on their 'recommended' list from a local store. We call up, get the MAC changed the guy says it should work right away. The modems eth port is really screwed up, it would get an ip, work for around 2 minutes and die, then would need to be unplugged and plugged back in before it would work for another 2 minutes. Plugged the modem into a win box(was into the linux masq box) saem results. Install their 'troubleshooting' software.. admittedly, if you dind't know what you were doing it would be great.. tested speed and other things.but it doesn't help us at all. Hook it up via the USB and the thing works like a dream, even without their software on..I still think that the eth port is just screwed, but it could have needed their software to connect once.. no real problems since

  144. yet another reason not to be as the others by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 2

    those poor M$ Windows users, chasing virus, hiding from spyware, trying to hard not to crash.
    People, computing doesn't have to be that way.

    Folks who don't know Linux think Linux is so hard, but it's not as hard as preserving your windows install. Really.

    This message brought to you by those of us who are not as others, and have an esier time using our computers than you do.

    Microserfs, Please remove Bill Gates's dick from your mouth and join the rebel alliance. It's really much nicer over here, and you're all making people think that computers are hard to use.

    1. Re:yet another reason not to be as the others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Folks who don't know Linux think Linux is so hard, but it's not as hard as preserving your windows install. Really.

      People who know nothing about Windows think that maintaining a Windows system is hard.

      The problem with Windows is that any fool can use it. As such, any fool can screw it up.

      The problem with Linux is that not just any fool can use it - just the geeky ones. As such, it'll never make a dent in the desktop market. No matter how bad you zealots foam at the mouth, Joe User will continue to buy and use Windows.

    2. Re:yet another reason not to be as the others by The+Bungi · · Score: 2
      That's nice, but you also can't spell worth a shit.

      So please remove that penguin from your ass and try to post again. This time, boot into your pirated copy of Windows 3.1 and use Word's spell checker, fer fucks sake.

    3. Re:yet another reason not to be as the others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Linux can run my various games I have, drop me a note....

  145. Bundeled DSL software (a la Verizon) by BobRooney · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many DSL providers operate over the PPPoE protocol. Bundled with Verizon's was their crappy support software that I really didnt want or need.

    Typically, the implementation used by the DSL provider (my experience was with Verizon), is not nearly as good as other versions available.

    If you're a tweaker, bandwith whore or just generally care about your connection's performance I recommend heading over to DSL Reports.com and grabbing a copy of RASPPPoE and Dr. TCP. Packet size and receiving window settings can make a world of difference.

  146. On the other hand by RKloti · · Score: 1

    When I got cable (Cablecom/Swissonline), there was no tech sent at all. They just sent the cable modem plus instructions on how to install it and get a connection working.

  147. Re:BANDWIDTH controled by firmware updates from IS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to borrow

    steal, and if he is caught, he'll be facing time. Shit, there was a story about this on Slashdot not two months back!

  148. What's scary is this article by waltc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Quote, unquote: "Since I can always remove the software, I agreed, but I noticed while he was flipping through the install, he was clicking 'agree' on every EULA that came up. ....Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the software; the cable guy did. And is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have this software on their computers is pretty high."

    Ummmm...."clicking through the Eulas" is the only way to install the software. If he wants "cable companies to stop doing this" he could have cancelled the install and thrown the "cable guy" out. And, yes, as he observed the cable guy "clicking through the Eulas" and did not throw him out he *did* agree to them. However, this is a moot point because the software is easily uninstallable and is not required for the cable modem to function properly.

    Cable companies are frequently "monopolies" in towns because of the expense of laying new cable and maintaining it. You can't have 10 cable companies all laying 10 strands of cable on each telephone poll. Besides that, it isn't economical for a company to provide service in an area in which it cannot have a guaranteed customer base (not a guaranteed number of paying customers--that is entirely different), because of the expense involved in setting up the cabling to begin with. Towns frequently entertain "bids" by competing cable companies as to which company will provide the area with the best prices, service and choice prior to awarding the "contract" to a particular cable company. It's not a monopoly--it's a practicality.

    Frankly, I grow a bit weary hearing people complain about non-issues like this. Usually, these complaints are based on a wide degree of ignorance and fear, just like this one. It would be a different matter if you couldn't uninstall the software and still use the modem. But you can, and that fact alone makes this much ado about nothing.

  149. AT&T Broad Band and BroadJump by Dyvim · · Score: 1

    Just some facts about AT&T Broadband and software:
    You have to run the setup program when you first get your modem now (this was not true a year ago) because their setup program now does the following things:
    (1) Collects and submits your MAC address. (note to people use a router/nat/ipmasq you have to simulate this MAC address or they will know, I have heard of friends getting calls about it)
    (2) Collects and submits your modems info and your location etc.
    (3) Verfies your info (address, name, acount number etc)
    (4) Sets up your e-mail address etc.
    (5) Makes you agree to EULA.
    From my experiance, you HAVE to run the setup for it to work. It seems the account is not "active" or something until you run this. I tried to use the modem as I had in the past year at a different location, but it would not work until I ran the setup.
    I uninstalled everything, and it still works fine in Windows and FreeBSD.
    I have no idea what else BroadJump does, I do know that it runs with a splash screen everytime you boot up when it is installed. Which is annoying.
    AT&T BI ain't half bad where I am, I get good speeds. So, just uninstall it, and you will be fine.

    --
    -A
  150. One time... by snowlick · · Score: 4, Funny

    The guy that came over to install my stuff was a total moron. When signing up for my cable modem service I decided to do the "honeypot" idea with my Windows machine, which I figured would be easiest (let them screw everything up, then pull out the info I need after they leave). There was a spot of trouble which I didn't forsee, however: I use Apple Studio Displays on all of my machines, and he couldn't get over the fact that they aren't iMacs. When he got there he was like, "Aa, iMacs? They're fancy. I don't know how to install this stuff on iMacs. Let me call my supervisor..."

    I had three clearly visible beige boxes under the table at this point, which obviously had the monitors connected to them, the keyboards, mouses, etc, etc.

    I tell him, "No, man, these are all PC's."
    "Yeah, cool. Hmmm..."
    *fiddles with one of them running Windows98, dials number on cellphone*
    "Yeah, what's up, man. Um, I got these iMacs here, and I was wondering what I should do..."
    I just about hit him over the head with my chair. After some pressuring I got to talk to the guy on the other end of the phone, who gave me everything I needed to know(IP, etc). When I gave the phone back I could hear him yelling at the "installer."

    "Oh, you mean that they aren't iMacs. That's crazy. They look just like em."

    What the FUCK...

    --
    Crystal Meth: Would you ingest somthing made from a poisonous gas and an explosive metal? You do it every day -- Salt!
    1. Re:One time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tell him, "No, man, these are all PC's."

      Maybe he just got confused because iMacs are personal computers too.

  151. the solution: by eurostar · · Score: 1

    /sbin/adsl-setup

  152. No software needed? by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi,

    I work for a Dutch cable provider that *does* need software installed, as they use PPPoE for subscriber access. Windows XP is a godsend, in that regard, since it has PPPoE built-in, but all other versions of Windows require PPPoE software to be installed.

    Also supplied on the CD are a mac version of the software, and also the source package of Roaring Penguin's PPPoE client for linux, although for linux I'd recommend just downloading the latest version. And, of course, there are no spyware things on the CD, though it does rather sneakily lock the MSIE Homepage setting in Windows XP's registry.

    You don't get full installation unless you pay extra for it. If you don't, you just get the modem, a generic signal amplifier for TV signal, and a length of UTP cable. If you do, you get a network card too, and an incompetent lout to install it all for you.

    And company that doesn't offer it in this manner should be avoided, if possible.

  153. ntl did nothing by Fweeky · · Score: 2

    At the time I was using a little 486 with Slackware and a pair of NE2000 NIC's as a gateway (which up to that point had been running dialup).

    I had SLIP connecting it to my Amiga, Ethernet to my Dual Celeron, two monitors, three keyboards, two mice, and a worrying amount of cable.

    The engineer took one look at it, put on a slightly exasperated expression, plugged/drilled/screwed everything in, and said "I'm sure you know what to do" before leaving.

    I plugged in the CM to the other NIC, started dhcpcd, tweaked my firewall to point to the new interface, and that was that.

  154. My Experience in Rogers (Ontario Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I picked self install. Guy still came out because I didn't have cable TV (he had to switch on service at the apartment's cable box or something). He put something on one cable outlet in the living room then went to the office and hooked up the cable modem, plugged it into his own laptop computer to check it, then dropped off a booklet of how-to's and was on his way. I even got a SB-Ethernet adapter which lets me plug my notebook into my router when I want.

  155. my cable guy had ME click "I AGREE" by babylon93 · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to say that. He actually had me read the EULA then click "I AGREE". I am here in Englewood, Colorado. Maybe this issue has already come up for them?

  156. Comcast and Mac OS 9 by pikester · · Score: 1

    My mom got a Comcast cable modem two weeks ago, they guy came in, installed the modem & turned ont the DHCP settings for the computer, no software, no BS.

    Too bad the guy who came out six weeks ago didn't think that 170MB of memory was enough to actually "install" the cable modem...

  157. Full of shit by olympus_coder · · Score: 1

    The guy told me the same thing, then he moved the mouse, realized he had never seen a password prompt like that and just said, "ok, I'll just leave it with you. Please sign here."

    The best be is just to tell them you will install it and thank you. Make them not let you pay them if they won't agree to it.

    Andrew

    --
    Spell check? Why bother. That is what grammer/spelling Nazi freaks who waiste band width posting "spell right" are for.
  158. their home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.broadjump.com/

  159. This is probably subsidising the costs by Zocalo · · Score: 2
    I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if "CableCo Inc." wasn't getting paid upfront by "Annoying Pop-Unders Inc." to collect data for them. The money earned by CableCo would then be used to fund price reductions for the customers with any left over going straight onto the bottom line.

    If you are smart, then you will naturally uninstall/use a dummy PC/self-install/whatever to avoid this, but what about the average, non technical user who has bought into the hype? I'd be very interested to see how much of this is mentioned in the T&C of the agreement. I'll bet it doesn't lay too great a point on the fact that your taste in pr0n will be given to another company. There's a class action or three in there sooner or later, I'm sure...

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  160. There is one answer... by Kindaian · · Score: 1

    Just tell him that the computer is of your father... and he is a lawyer... and so is OFF LIMITS to anyone even you...

    Did he bring a portable to test the connection?

    Nope? Tough luck chummer... you will have to come back again... with either a court order to allow access to the computer or a portable to try the connection.

    Aren't lawyers handy in some cases?

    ROFL

  161. The cable guy himself told me not to install it... by pvera · · Score: 2

    I got mine while it was still @home. The technician told me not to install any of the software that @home sent me. I had their service until their demise and I am now on Comcast. Comcast does not force me to install anything but they force you to install an activex control if you want to use their support website.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  162. Where are my mod points by moogla · · Score: 2

    I'd give you a big-mac an and egg-mc-muffin-cellent karma rating.

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  163. hmmm... by Kindaian · · Score: 1

    Note to self... re-check grammer...

    1. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Note to self... re-check grammer...


      and spelling.
  164. One word by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    Telocity

  165. DNS is down by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can easly run your own DNS under linux.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:DNS is down by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

      But you have to have something 'above' you in the DNS tree, to be able to do anything above you. Now if you know an alternate DNS server (which there are many), then that's great and you don't need to use the RR DNS server.

      --
      Tibbon
      tibbon.com
    2. Re:DNS is down by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But you have to have something 'above' you in the DNS tree,

      Duh.

      They're called "Root nameservers."

      Here's a list (from my /etc/dnsroots.global file)

      • 198.41.0.4
      • 128.9.0.107
      • 192.33.4.12
      • 128.8.10.90
      • 192.203.230.10
      • 192.5.5.241
      • 192.112.36.4
      • 128.63.2.53
      • 192.36.148.17
      • 198.41.0.10
      • 193.0.14.129
      • 198.32.64.12
      • 202.12.27.33
      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
    3. Re:DNS is down by dattaway · · Score: 3, Informative

      And if you don't want to "nice" the root servers, put your local ISPs nameservers first in your /etc/resolv.conf file:

      nameserver 12.34.56.78 --your isp nameserver here
      nameserver 127.0.0.1 --this is bind on localhost

      The first nameserver will be the first on the list, and localhost is second, which will use bind to query the root servers.

    4. Re:DNS is down by Just+Another+Perl+Ha · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ummm... all you'd need is a root.cache file which can be created with one simple command:
      • dig @a.root-servers.net . NS
      That's all the above you anyone would ever need.
    5. Re:DNS is down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dig @a.root-servers.net . NS

      So how exactly do you resolve a.root-servers.net?

    6. Re:DNS is down by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

      And if you don't want to "nice" the root servers...bind to query the root servers.



      1. Friends don't let friends run BIND

      2. I'm not adversely affecting the root nameservers, and they're designed to handle a great deal more traffic than they do. Heck, even under a DDOS attack, about half of them stayed responsive.

      3. Since I run djbdns, my DNS is more reliable than my ISP's, anyway.
      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
  166. Mortals Getting What They Deserve by edward.virtually@pob · · Score: 1

    To hell with the mortals. They're the same idiots who worship Gates and bad-mouthed the DOJ for trying to make him behave. Given that MS is now going to get off scott free, it's stupid to expect other corporations (cable companies in this case) to give a rat's ass about how Wrong it is to abuse ignorant customers. The DOJ has already proven it can't or won't do anything about it.

    1. Re:Mortals Getting What They Deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the DOJ successfully brought charges against MS. It's the business friendly Bush administration who's giving them a bye. Remember that next time you vote.

  167. Spyware, Trojans, Virii... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2

    This makes me happy I'm running OpenBSD. I don't think there is much chance they could install all this crap on that. Heck, all you need to get it working is dhclient or ifconfig. It all comes with the system. If I need anything else, their setup is non-standard and I don't want it. (OK, there's PPPoE, but I don't have experience with it. I guess PPPoE a Good Thing). Besides, I don't need a cable guy. I can plug the cables myself.

    Unfortunately, this is not the case for most people. Those people will pay for broadband, and get it, plus a load of software that clutters if not breaks their systems. Then they have to call tech support and have it fixed. All the complexity will deter them even more from computers, and bring them further from getting to learn how they work. This will make them more dependent on the companies they get tech support from.

    1. Offer a good service
    2. Mess people's systems
    3. PROFIT!!!

    ---
    DRM: short for Digital Rights Manglement. Any method to restrict users' rights to do whatever they want with their property, often in name of security.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  168. What about the dodgy hardware... by NetSerf2000 · · Score: 1
    A friend of mine had Telewest Blueyonder come out and setup a cable modem for him and install a NIC at the same time...

    The original technician just pulled out all the cables to install the card, didnt screw the card down and then plugged the USB stuff back into the wrong sockets and it screwed up my friends printer (USB support is crap in 98SE). However the NIC was faulty and my friend couldnt get more than 1.5k/sec download and so in the end, I took his machine back to my place, installed an identical card into it to test and blam... full speed connections.

    He ended up getting the technician out there again to get it fixed... But they were trying to put the problem back onto him so they didnt have to do any more work on it.

    He was most pissed off about all that entire episode. Still he owns a pub and I get free beer when he is around for the work that I have done on his computer. so it isnt all that bad...

    --
    *** I had a .sig, but then I got a life ***
  169. Broadjump Client Foundation information: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The software:
    http://www.velocidadejusta.com.br/manua is/speedyPP POE/BroadJump/
    More information (search the page):
    http://www.pacs-portal.co.uk/startup_pages /startup _full.htm
    Broadjump's homepage:
    http://www.broadjump.com/
    Mention of Broadjump in Yahoo's EULA:
    http://support.sbcglobal.net/legal/5070.sht ml
    Information about the Broadjump Client (looks like it spys on whether you've overclocked your connection):
    http://osiris.978.org/~brianr/mirror s/www.iscentra l.org/%257Etcniso/main/cisp.htm
    Posting what will be a +5 informative as an Anonymous Coward:
    Priceless

  170. Use a junk PC by smoon · · Score: 2

    When I had roadrunner installed (a long time ago) I just put a junk hard drive in my PC with windows 95 (they didn't support Linux).

    When the tech came I let them do whatever they were going to do. When they left I checked the relevant settings and the pulled the hard drive out, and put my primary drive back in.

    --
    "But actually trying to use m4 as a general-purpose langage would be deeply perverse" --ESR
  171. A quick annecdote froma lurker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kind of offtopic, but funny never the less.

    My old roommate worked in a silicon valley network software provider while we were out there (he moved to chicago after the layoffs and I moved to Germany for better job security). Admittedly I don't know the details as much as I should (mike, if you happen to read this, you could provide some more) but the lame internet provider that we picked was having trouble getting us a connection. It turned out that we were one of the first people on the node that they were trying to set up. Mike called in to demand why we weren't getting service and after quite a bit of discussion he was finally connected to the person who was actually setting up the node. Funny thing was that they were using the software that Mike's company sold, a large chunk of which was written by, you guessed it: mike. He was able to talk the guy on the other end of the phone through the setup. Presto, one internet connection.

  172. Make sure you read the EULAs by Vic · · Score: 2

    If they insist that you install their software, make sure you insist that you read every last word of every EULA for every piece of software they install. If even one or two people do this in a day, it will throw their installation schedule right off and make it not worth doing.

    If these installers are putting software on customers' computers, it should be the customers that click through the EULAs.

    Cheers,
    Vic

  173. Isn't Ready for the desk top by Casualposter · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You pay for MS Office, and most offices have it. But in order to USE Excel, Word, Access, etc, you have to LEARN how to use it. Most of the current work force was educated before the advent of the PC and many more before WINDOWs and OFFICE became defacto standards.

    The cost of training people to work on computers isn't going away just because you bought COMMERCIAL software. In fact, Learning Linux is not any worse than learning some of the older and less user friend software packages that are still in use today. Linux is cheaper, unless it can be demonstrated that it will significantly increase the total cost of ownership. The total cost of ownership is expressed as: Cost per liscence, terms of liscence, hardware required, training required, and risk that the software will be obsoleted before its useful life is over.

    Just because Linux doesn't look or work like WINDOWS doesn't mean that it will be that much harder to learn. Many people in computer intensive operations worked on mainframes and other systems that were hard to use. Training is always required.

    --
    Creative Spelling Copyright (2002). May use without Persimmons
  174. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  175. Eh? by dacarr · · Score: 2
    OK, this one's interesting. A few years ago, @home did not support Linux. SO imagine some tech's surprise when he got to this Linux-only family I know.

    WHat this guy did was spend 30 minutes while the patriarch of said family explained to him 1) why you can't install Windows software on a Linux system and 2) that he could set up the system himself if teh tech would just give him the appropriate information. Finally the tech conceded.

    Moral of the story: if you can bullshit your way out of it, you don't *have* to install the tracker software.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  176. Software? by skurk · · Score: 1

    I didn't have to install anything. Over here the cable modem is installed with a cable router, so all the clients have to do is request a DHCP address and we're online.

    Geo: Trondheim, Norway

    --
    www.6502asm.com - Code 6502 assembly or.. DIE!!
  177. unix software by JDizzy · · Score: 2

    I fail to see how this is an issue when you use a non-Microsoft environment. Will the field service-dude know how to install this software under wine's emulation? Will he even know what wine is? Do I even have Wine installed? Is there a MAC or Unix version of these software tools? What about the possibility to format Windows imediatly after the service-man leaves the room?

    Is this a notion of you must submit to the service man installing software before he leaves, or is this a notion of you must run this software to use the network? I think the later is highly unlikely, and the former to be part of the burocratic tangle inside the network companies.

    Every time I call the cable company, I have to explain to them that my computer is a FreeBSD box with an AMD 100Mhz 486 chip with 64Mb of memory. Then they explain to me that they only support XYZ setup, and I have to explain to them that I'm talking about my router, and I have XYZ behind it. I thne have to explain to them the way DHCP works, and how that is all that they actually require. Once your have them spell bound with ignorant IP terminology, they tend to shutup and go away. I figure the same jedi mind trick can be done with the field service people. ;)

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
  178. more info, mod this up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interes ting-people/200202/msg00164.html
    http://www.inter esting-people.org/archives/interes ting-people/200206/msg00132.html

  179. Inherently evil? by sterno · · Score: 1

    Capitalism isn't any more inherently evil than Marxism or any other ism out there. It does have benefits and drawbacks and I'll agree that the way it is practiced in the United States right now has A LOT of drawbacks. Generally speaking any ism, by itself without some other isms thrown in to the mix to provide balance goes badly.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  180. Standard Op Procedure for Cable Modem installs by jmlyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, according to "policy," the installer can't do anything unless you are running a supported OS that boots with no errors. He is supposed to install the ISP's marketing software, change the homepage to the ISP's advertising portal, yada yada yada.

    BUT there is very little standardization among installers. The quality is EXTREMELY low. I worked for a company that specialized in Cable Modem installations for broadband providers, and still the majority of the contractors were just Cable TV techs. I started out as a Tech, having not worked for about a year. Of course, I was promoted to Regional Training Supervisor within a few weeks. I wrote a Standard Operating Procedure Manual for doing Cable Modem installs that was used by 150 or so techs in Atlanta. After that company was bankrupted (by the owner stealing money, equipment, and blatant discrimination against white people and women (Thanks again, James Clavon!)), I saw that my manual was being taken by the techs to other companies, and those other companies promptly made it their official document.

    Anyway, when I wrote it, I had to take into account the demands of the ISP's that contracted us to do the installs, but I took advantage of every loophole that I could to have the install done the way that I would want it done on MY machine.

    Specifically, there was software provided by the ISP which was SUPPOSED to make all of the modifications to the system required, but it crapped out a lot of the time. At the time (about two years ago) the software did JUST make the TCP/IP changes, add an email account (to Outlook Express), change the home page, and send a machine description (hardware stats) to the ISP. I encouraged techs to avoid using this software and do the entire process manually.

    Yada yada, more random info:
    As a supervisor, I had to tell techs to bail on the install if the machine didn't fit the ISP's minimum reqs (like supported OS), but if I was doing an install, or was nearby when a tech radioed me with a problem, I would get the install done for anyone who wanted the service. I could judge the customers pretty well, in that if they were self-sufficient computer users, I would just give them the TCP/IP connection, because that's all they needed. If they needed tech support in the future, they'd have to deal with either putting up a temporary supported OS, removing their firewall (unsupported), or (my preferred method) just lying to tech support, giving the answers that will lead them down their trouble shooting checklist towards getting the damned connection fixed.

    Anyway.... I don't know about thew state of affairs today. Now I'm more on the CMTS end in that field. I wouldn't be suprised if the software had spyware components. When I was getting out of that area, they were introducing a "ToolKit" application which WAS somewhat useful in that it would check the status of connections to email, news, & DNS servers, etc. They wanted it to run in the systray and I think it did report back some traffic and usage info to the ISP. But when I had a connection problem, it was easy to start that app and confirm they were having email issues. Now, they probably have much more Orwellian things in the works....

    jmlyle

    --
    I have misplaced my pants.
  181. From a former 'cable-guy' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The software install is not required, by most companies (if your in the US, the FCC doesn't allow them to force it on you) you can refuse the software install, although they may then qualify your service as a 'self-install' meaning you would have to go pick up a modem, and they would let you worry about it and be responsable for all of it. Most of the time however, if you explain it to the installer, you can just sign for the form, he gets paid his install credit, and gets a bonus for a quick install (installers are paid per-job)

  182. Oh Puh-lease!!! by ChaosMt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Freedom by obscurity?!? Ya that's the ticket, we'll all go underground and that way we can practice our freedoms in secret with out the problems for governments or corporate cheiftons. Great plan there Chester.

    Look, the cable companies enjoy their quasi-monopoly status and they seem quite happy to abuse their position, and with the law makers pockets lined well, they will have no worries. What worries me is the lack of FULL disclosure. If I'm going to be screwed in such a way, I think you should at LEAST know what's going on. I want a legal form that people read with glazed over eyes and initial parts to show them EXACTLY what information will be collected and used against them. However, as long as Michael "nepotisim" Powell is the chairman of the FCC to serve interests of the greatest donors and not the people, we might as well get used to saying, "Thank you sir! May I have another!"

  183. Easy Solution and Fun Too. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny

    I keep all my cable installers and put them in a deep circular well in my basement. They scream and holler, especially when I tell them I'm going to make a fleshsuit out of their skin. I won't feed them until they put the lotion on. And I get all the channels for free!

  184. EULA for the EULA by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the software

    Chances are the contract you signed for the cable modem says that you consent to them installing that on your system.

    RAN in MA didn't install anything for me and I didn't have to install anything as far as I remember.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  185. Road Runner by Mage99 · · Score: 1

    Yes I had the same experience with Road Runner. The dude installed the software and answered all the prompts for me. They're "manager" software is required to access the systems that will let you add email addresses or start a homepage. Soon after install I wiped the system and reinstalled the OS without the software. This obiviously doesn't undo the damage already done but would prevent any spyware from keeping tabs on my surfing habbits etc.

    --
    We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act, but a habit.
  186. hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    true story (it happened to one of my computers):

    the cable guy came over to install the modem. check.
    then he was installing the software (win98 was the os on the box). then BOOM! CRASH! OPERA!
    reset...
    hmmm, the contents of my hardrive seem to be hiding... wtf!

    basically dont let anyone install software on your computer especially if they are cable guys!

  187. Recent (Few days ago) AT&T install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My neice just got a nice shiney Toshiba laptop, and she ordered AT&T broadband. The night before the install, she brought the laptop over to my house, I plugged it into my mini network, got an ip, and proceeded to configure the PC with all the software and update the PC with the latest patches etc...

    The next day, the tech came to her home, drilled the holes, unboxed the Surfboard cable modem and that was that. The tech left the install disk and said that you would have to install the software themselves (I presume that was because my neice was not there at the time, school!).

    My neice called me, I went over, looked at the CD and said, we don't need that. I tried to get an IP but it would not work, released and renewed but no joy.

    My neice's mother came in and said that the tech said that you WOULD HAVE TO install the CD to get the connection to work.

    So I said, what the heck, I can always de-install the crap, so I popped in the CD and went through the install, it asked for details like a subscriber number, registration code, name and address confirmation, then it proceeded to reset the cable modem, and when that was done, installed the broadjump crap, and asked to reboot, which I did.

    After that, the IP was given and I proceeded to de-install the broadjump crap. That was that.

    It appears from this very recent experience that you have to run the install CD. I wonder if you don't have a windows PC, are you sh!t outta luck!

    One curious point... when I had the laptop hooked at my home network, the MAC address was DIFFERENT to the mac address that it now has, just strange.

    One last thing, for the past few weeks, I've been getting a DHCP lease of 1 Hour, yes you read right... I called AT&T and they said that this was "normal", wanted to know if this was happening to any other New England/Boston area AT&T customers.

    1. Re:Recent (Few days ago) AT&T install by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Actually, you don't HAVE to install the junk.

      I had a similar experience. I have two computers running OS X and on on Linux. I had been using this setup with ATT Broadband for 2 years. (NOTE: I HATE ATT BROADBAND.)

      When we changed names on the acocunt they insisted that duw to new policies they had to come and swap the cable modem.

      Now (as of a few months ago they said) the cable modems have to be registered. That is what the software does.

      So I told the cable guy I would run the software, he said OK and left. The disk SAID it was OSX compatible - but I didn't care.

      I then called the support line and said that I needed to register the modem. They sent me to a website that asked all the questions the software would have.

      Mozilla didn't work. IE in OSX wouldn't even work. But I started up Classic, and ran IE in OS9 and it worked. (Even through a NAT Firewall utility).

      Moral? Just call customer service after the installer leaves and get the website...

      PS: I HATE ATT BRAODBAND. But I have no other options realistically for broadband.

  188. Better yet.... by mblase · · Score: 2

    ...tell him your OS isn't supported. I'd like to see them try and get anything like that running on my OS X box, or on a Linux partition. :)

  189. Boss's Reaction to Lilo by TibbonZero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So a few years back I was working for the IT department in a county that I lived in doing Tier 2 networking support.
    It was kinda nice, being 17 and having my own parking space, office, nametag with picture, etc... and computer that they gave me...
    Now they were pretty strict about paperwork and licensing, being gov't and all, and at first my boss thought I wouldn't even need a computer of my own in the office at first, but then I needed to check my Groupware email so much, so I got a little crappy Pentium 3/300mhz that I found in the 'Old Computers, Destroy these, don't give them away' room.

    Anyway, I installed Windows 2000 (or 98) or it first, but I left 10Gb as an extra partition.
    I got bored one day and thought, well I am working in Unix stuff in the server room all the time, and this thing doesn't even have SSH built in, so let's install linux. I thought to consult my Boss, but then decieded not to bug him. I had the license, it was free! He said not to bring any software from home, because of pirating/licensing issues, but thought this would be fine.
    I loaded Linux, and it worked like a dream on the machine (this was before Redhat was BloatHat by default). So of course I use Lilo to switch between Windows for email (groupware...), and Linux. I was also testing out VMWare to try to get the Groupware going in Linux.
    Anyway, a few weeks later (being a lowly intern) I have to share my desk and computer with someone who is just starting, which was fine with me. It was a two person office anyway, and she was just using my computer until she got her own.
    One day, apparently she rebooted Windows for something, and I forgot to ever mention linux for more than a second. Lilo comes up, and she sits and thinks, so it goes to Linux. Then when it prompts her for a username/password, she goes to the Bossman :)

    Bossman says to me in his office later, "I need to talk to you, did you load Linux on your computer?". To make a long story long, I didn't get fired or anything but I did have to explain my way out of it (GNU, etc...)
    The next day he gave me a machine to work on in Linux and test VMWare on. It was a Dual Processor Box, with 1gb memory, and 4 harddrives all in Hardware raid!!! I had to load Oracle and VMWare on it... Oh, what a job !

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Boss's Reaction to Lilo by enneff · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like your boss is even more clueless than you.

    2. Re:Boss's Reaction to Lilo by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 2

      Things would have been far far worse if he'd seen grub.

      Bosses hate grub.

      --
      -- clvrmnky
    3. Re:Boss's Reaction to Lilo by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      You remind me of a DS9 epp where someone impersinated an admral and answered questions with
      "That is a stupid question"

      So care to enlighten us or is there nothing behind your little slam.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
  190. Re:Have a honeypot - an old MAC by twoslice · · Score: 2, Informative

    A friend once had an old MAC that did not support DHCP which he used to loan to friends before the cable guy installed anything. The cable guy always said the same thing - Geez there are a shitload of these old MAC's around but I guess I have to give you a static IP address because these things don't support DHCP (Yippee!).

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  191. "Hey, that isnt windows !" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I got a cable modem I just booted all my machines into various distros of linux, all in console mode. Needless to say, he left the software end of things alone.

  192. How to deal with the cable guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found that letting him take a gander at my dual-monitor Enlightenment setup for a moment relieved him of his need to install any software. He watched politely as I opened up an Eterm and SIGHUP'd dhcpcd, after which everything worked.


    Though I suppose he could have tried installing Windows spyware... wouldn't have gotten very far.

  193. They tried the same thing at the office... by Izang · · Score: 1

    Yeah, our cable company tried to do all kinds of ridiculous "testing" at our office. Since it is a business account, the technician claimed that he had to have access to one of computers or he couldn't leave the modem. I happily pulled up an IRIX 6.5 shell and watched him stare at the screen for a good 5 minutes. The only thing they need to do is test the signal strength and get the fuck out. I'll be dammed if I'm going to let some toothless hillbilly with "2 weeks of installer training" have full access to any of my machines.

  194. Windows by The+Spelling+Nazi · · Score: 0

    The cable guy said I needed this thing called Windows...

  195. Thankyou... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2

    ...that's the funniest post I've read in months. I could picture the idiots in front of VMWare. hehe.... lol...

  196. Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I left my (ungraphical) linux console running when the Cable Guy showed up with his List of Things to do... 'sorry, I don't run windows'...

    He pretty much ticked the box that said 'other' and connected the modem and left.

  197. Re:it wouldn't work by Choco-man · · Score: 2, Informative

    My wife is a producer for the largest NBC affiliate in the nation (and has worked for a variety of other affiliate outlets). Advertising is THE reason networks exist, and your local media outlet will NEVER run a story that may adversely affect the possibility of them generating advertising revenue. If they run a story that says company X is bad, company X will never advertise with them - hence negative story on company X will never run.

    Now, your national outlets are a different story - Dateline or national news types will respond differently.

  198. I had that shit installed on my laptop by rr by LWolenczak · · Score: 2

    The guy installed it not knowing he was using a computer in vmware... when he rebooted it... he freaked realising he was really in linux... he got his things then left quickly... from what I found, the stuff was complete spyware. Not Cool. I called up road runner to complain, but they hung up on me six times.

  199. Ameritech experience by Shamashmuddamiq · · Score: 1

    I ordered Ameritech DSL (my only option). They finally showed up about a month later to install it. I had recently upped my machine's RAM to 768MB, and I hadn't booted to Windows since then. Despite trying for 3 hours, the guy couldn't install the software because 'doze 98 can't deal with more than 512MB of RAM (without a little hack I had to use later). Since I had no intention of using the DSL modem on a windows machine, I told him to leave and I would take care of it. An hour later, I had PPPOE running on my linux server. He never did install any software.

    --
    ...just my 2 gil.
  200. Do this next time for fun... by ccity · · Score: 1

    I had a cable installer at my house about a year ago, he didnt want to install any software, but he did ask to use my computer. He accessed IE from my windows 98 machine and accessed his personal account for comcast to check all the line settings for my house I presume. After doing that he asked if he could erase all my rmep internet files and cookies becasuse he accessed a secure comcast site and he needed to erase anyting that would have his password, etc.. I said sure, but right as he was packed up and ready to leave I said, "so it would be bad if I had a keylogger installed on my machine that just saved all your keystrokes to a text file right?" he looked sort of scared, and said you dont have that do you?, no of course not I replied.

  201. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS? SUE? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    I hate lawyers, and lawsuits, but this is one of the few times it seems legit. No one has answered, "What are the legal implications of SOMEONE ELSE clicking of YOUR end user licence aggreement?"

    I would get a free consult and see what's what. Sounds to me like he, LITTERALY, hacked your system. Even if you signed a form or contract, YOU must click YES to make those aggreements valid. He did that on your behalf. Fraud? Tort? Misrepresentation? It could be a number of things!

    Good luck!

  202. What I do.. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Keep the IPs of my most used sites in my hosts file.

  203. Nothing: I had to do it for the bastards by sjonke · · Score: 1

    Mind you, this was early on in the cable-modem game, but still. Moreover, we are talking about a Mac. It was easy and there wasn't any need for software to be installed, but they really didn't have a clue.

    Several years later I tried to get rid of both cable-modem and cable-tv because I was moving. I called to ask them to disconnect both. They said they'd do it. They didn't. They only disconnected the cable-tv. Moreover, I didn't receive a bill at my new house until 2 months had passed and they wanted me to pay for both of those months. I tried to fight it for a while but it was insane and eventually I gave in - I didn't have time to fight the good fight with a new house and a new baby to take care of. In summary: Comcast fucks over its best customers. Glad I'm on DSL now and sans cable TV.

    --
    --- What?
  204. knock, knock...."Cable Guy" by InOverMyFeet · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I had my cable broadband service brought to the house about a year and a half ago. The cable guy never even mentioned installing software on my rig. He almost tried to install a NIC but I cut him off at the knees (nobody touches the box); told him I already had one and all I needed from him was an RJ-45. He was cool with it. He then asked if I wanted a NIC anyway. I said sure, took 2 of them. They were cheap SMC's. I figured they would be fine in one of the computers I would be putting together for a relative. He then gave me his personal cellphone number and told me that if I had any trouble to call him direct because going through the switchboard would be fruitless. I immediately had flashbacks of the Jim Carry flick - Cable Guy. I said "...on second thought, I don't really need these NIC's". Nipped it in the bud. As he drove away I was mumbling "Red knight going down...down, down, down".

    --

    -- Probability does not dismiss possibility --

  205. Its the Microsoft way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically ignore the EULA.

    Format your hard drive, setup your networking with a firewall and scan your traffic.

    If you see stuff going out, hijack it yourself and spam the bejeevus out of the damn server that it is being sent to, IF it contains personal information.

    So, lets go over this again ....

    Firewall
    Format
    Fuck-em

    The Cardinal 3-F's

  206. Can you Quote all the EULAs you agreed to? by TibbonZero · · Score: 2

    Really, though, I mean the cable guy doesn't wanna sit there while you call a lawyer (hey, if everyone could understand the law and it was simple enough, we wouldn't need lawyers) and go through the contract before signing it? I guess you could make him, but it's just poor form.

    There really isn't much in the average Time Warner contract that is odd. When I was working at Time Warner in the Business Division, we would even get contract back and the boss would kinda 'haggle' with them and our lawyers on points in the contract. It's not out of the question to ammend the contract. And for the most part every part of the contract was good to start with. Us as employees (and the bosses) really didn't like the idea of screwing people over, all we intended to do with contracts was protect ourselves from retarded lawsuits.
    In fact though, when I worked for the Business Division of Road Runner, I never installed ANY software on a person's computer. Most of the time we did just throw them the Cat 5 cable and left. We would hook up 1 computer, or hook it up to their network (but they would have to configure their network). No Spyware, no install CDs, etc... We even carried our own laptops to test everything on, instead of thinking that it was just 'their computer'. Anyway, it's hard to move their computer over to the rack to plug the serial port into the Cisco UBRs...

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
  207. The cable guy was scared by josephmerlynbath · · Score: 1

    of my OpenBSD computer. He insisted that I needed to reboot after he hooked up the modem. I told him I didn't, banged out a few commands, and my connection was up. He said: "See. I have no idea what you just did."

  208. Just use Linux.. by xchino · · Score: 1

    My cable installer didn't know wtf to do. He had never even heard of Linux, and he certainly didn't have any client software that ran under Linux. He demanded to try anyways, so I let him. 5 minutes later he just asks me to sign that he installed it.

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
  209. An easy way out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can be very pushy about their software installs, but if you simply tell them that you use an alternative os, they do not go near your pc.

    I said I use linux as my only OS, and the cable guy just asked where to put the jack and left. I guess that's my punishment for being "different"

  210. I installed a DSL connection at a client's site... by SwedishChef · · Score: 2

    with a Linux box acting as the router/NAT gateway (as usual). When nothing worked we made the call to the "help desk".

    Phone tech: "Go to 'start/settings...".

    Me (interrupting): "Whoa there... we are using a Linux computer as the router."

    Long pause. I told him that his DSL modem didn't indicate that there was a connection.

    Long pause, then "I don't think the modem works with any operating system other than Windows. Don't you have a computer with Windows there you can connect to the modem?"

    Me: "Don't you have a real system administrator there somewhere I can talk to?"

    Phone tech in a bright voice: "Yes we do.. just a minute."

    He connected me to a clueful admin and we had the system up and running 5 minutes later.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  211. Nothing by KinkyClown · · Score: 1

    They had an offering, if you let them install a network card + software + configuration I would have spent EUR 300,- more. They would have charged me EUR 100,- for the network card what normally cost me EUR 10,- (no kidding). Labour cost are also extremly high. I used a do-it-yourself-kit. Before using a cable I had a dailup, they also provide software I didn't want to install (also contains spyware).

  212. Foil Hats by stankyho · · Score: 1

    I always make sure and keep and extra foil hat for just this reason. I also run a keyboard/keystroke logging tool to see exactly what secret messages he is sending back to base. The hidden web cam also gets a visual on anyone that gets on my 1337 Linux computer thats dual OC'd Athlons runnig @ 3ghz with 2 OC'd Nvida video cards on dual 24" flat panel monitors with 5.3 Dolby surround sound connected to 8 Martin Logan speakers and Sub and a giant modded case with windows and flashing neon and black lights and 22 fans and 3 120g hard drives and a DVD burner. with wireless Dvorak keyboard and wireless, optical, rechargable mouse.

    You should see the look on their faces when I ask em to take off thier shoes and put on the foil hats. Priceless.

    --

    ---
    eeww, I'll have a crab juice.
  213. Cable in Canada by MadocGwyn · · Score: 1

    We never have problems like this in canada, our providers are lazy and self install is pushed on ya anyway, but its a nice self install they do run the cableing, place the modem down, plug it in hand you a network cable, and instruction paper and walks out, this, is the way it should be. Self install is almost always the best option.

    --
    Jesus saves, everyone else takes full damage from the fireball.
  214. Broadjump is.... by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    An Austin-based software company who targets their marketing to broadband ISPs. A friend of mine interned there last year while she was finishing out her journalism degree. Her job, if I recall correctly, was to write (like a journalism, not CS major would write) some of the webpage content and also press releases.

    Essentially, their purpose is sort of like the giant installer CD that comes with your sound/video card. See, broadband ISPs, particualarly cable-based ones, don't really have their own install techs. Their guys are sub-contracted. In fact, Roadrunner's guys will have their company name and a "licensed subcontracter for Time-Warner Cable" printed on the side of their van. At least around here, there is a reasonable lead time for install, about a week, although I'm sure RoadRunner would like to speed that up, as it just leads to faster revenue/happier customers.

    Anyway, it's like the Video/Sound card CDs in that it's a bunch of useless software in addition to an auto-install program that speeds up the tech's process. Rather than configure the windows PC to pull on DHCP via the NIC, and set the mail client and web browser up, the broadjump software does it for them. It also (like the vid/sound card disc) installs a bunch of other useless cruft. They allegedly had some sort of remote support program, and a MMORPG (Blood pledge, I think... It's really big in Korea) where if the customer signed up through the link on their desktop, the ISP got like a $3/month cut.

    So anyway, that's their software.

  215. There is a DANGER in NOT reporting this by Skapare · · Score: 2

    There is a DANGER in NOT reporting this. This might be only the first step. The next step might be that they change the protocols and instead of using some kind of encapsulated ethernet, they layer the IP in something else that only their software can figure out (and they might encrypt it to be sure of this). I don't expect that to happen tomorrow, but if they don't see at least some resistance to taking over people's peecees now, they will keep moving to more control. They will try to find the point where they can get away with as much as possible because the more they can get away with, the more money they can get out of it. So when they they have IP encapsulated like that, you won't be able to access anything except from that one Windows machine. This would not be hard do. And as soon as they have the market softened up enough to believe they have to install all the software on your Windows computer, they will go for it. Then your Linux/BSD box won't have access anymore.

    They might do this for many reasons, all related to them making more money at our expense (in some form). Possible reasons include:

    • Force more people to use the spyware platform. This ensures the maximum number of hits from their spy affiliates.
    • Restrict your use of certain communications such as a tunnel to work, or encrypted file trading that they can't spy on.
    • Prevent you from accessing from more than one computer (even if you only do it from one at a time). Cable companies already have long established pricing tiers for getting more money out of people with more TVs, so don't think they won't try it for more computers.

    This is why we must:

    • Resist letting them install whatever they want. Use the self-install methods as much as possible. And have an "indemnity against damages contract" for the cable guy to sign if he wants to touch your peecee (just to scare him off of it).
    • Make sure the public is aware of the risks of invasion or privacy. They will get more spam and other forms of marketing, or worse. Imagine being turned down for health insurance because you visited certain sections of health websites about fatal diseases.
    • Make sure the public is aware of the risks of security. How do you know this software doesn't have tons of backdoors, known or even unknown (yet)?
    • Promote more widespread adoption of Linux/BSD/Unix as home desktop/workstation computers. The more presence Linux/BSD/Unix has in society, the more business has to acknowledge it and deal with it.

    They didn't need to rewire the insides of my TV to hook up cable. Why the hell should they have to "rewire" my computer's software just to get internet connectivity?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  216. My experiences.... by WeeLad · · Score: 1
    I've had both Cable and DSL (in that order). With my Cable Modem, the Cable Guy came to my apartment and plugged in the hardware. However, he couldn't even get the "signal" light to light up, which meant the modem wasn't even gettin recognized by the Cable company. Apparently they have to enter the some number (either a serial number, or MAC address, or something) by hand a couple of days before the install and someone had inverted a couple of numbers. Since he couldn't even get the modem to work, I told him not to bother installing anything on my computer. He had me sign, and he just told me to call tech support to get it fixed. Apparently the rest of the setup was left as an exercise for the student. A couple of days later, tech support was able to straighten out the issue.

    With DSL, I decided to do the self-install method. I wanted to connect my Router to the DSL bridge, but didn't have the password. The only documentation (yep, I had to read the documentation) said that during the software install process, I would be prompted to register in order to get a login name and password. Sure enough, after removing the Router from the setup and installing the software, I was prompted to create a login and password. After that, I could put my router back in the mix and use the login name and password I had created.

    There was not an apparent easier way to obtain a login name and password, but in hindsight, I think I could probably fake my way through customer support and have them create it for me by telling them that the registration program didn't work.

    --
    Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
  217. My experience by erik_fredricks · · Score: 2

    I have AT&T broadband. When the guy arrived, I told him I'd be happy installing it myself. He started into how he couldn't take responsibility, etc. I then told him I was installing it on a Linux system. He got an odd look and then got a form out of his truck that said something to the effect of "I absolve so and so of any responsibility..."

    All I had to get from him was the name server address. Funny thing is, he told me at first (just being nice) that he wasn't sure it would work, since the dialing software he had to install was proprietary. He even stuck around just to make sure it'd work.

    Of course, it did, but the moral is that the installers are sent out to do a specific job a specific way.

    --

    THE GOOD HUMOR MAN CAN ONLY BE PUSHED SO FAR
    Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 2F18

  218. Doesn't it matter who clickes "yes" on the EULA? by SwedishChef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Our techs install software for clients on a daily basis and I've often wondered whether it makes some difference who actually clicks to accept the EULAs. In our case we are not employees of the companies which actually bought this software, but are paid to install it by the purchasers. So what is *their* legal liability to a EULA if *I* click on "ok" to some incredibly stupid EULA? Who exactly is being put to a liability here (assuming a EULA actually incurs some liability at all, that is)?

    I think that if a company needed to wriggle out from under an overly-restrictive EULA they could certainly use the defense: "None of our people clicked on that agreement... it was a contractor and he didn't have the authority to bind us to a legal contract."

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  219. Parent comment is NOT flamebait. by Skapare · · Score: 2

    So far there are 2 moderations to the parent comment as flamebait (and 1 for insightful and 2 for interesting). The poster does have a valid point. He just happens to be wrong. Being wrong isn't flamebait.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  220. Buy a Mac! by ruzel · · Score: 1


    When the Comcast guys came over to my place to install the cable, there happened to be two of them -- one of them in training. The guy saw my TiBook and turning to the trainee said, "These are nice. With these kind, you just have to plug the modem in and plug it into the computer."
    Trainee: "That's it?"
    Cable Guy: "Yup. That's it."
    Macs are not only great for the install, but they're obscure enough that there isn't any crappy marketroid software written for them!
    </typical macintosh rant>
    _____________

    1. Re:Buy a Mac! by thechink · · Score: 1

      Yes that's a typical and uninformed Mac rant.

      What you describe works with PCs that come with an ethernet port too. Crappy marketroid software is not required.

      What you left out was IP configuration (DHCP or static?) and email setup. The Mac doesn't automatically solve those issues for you.

  221. I considered setting up a Linux router by Royster · · Score: 2

    Eventually, I decided it was more cost effective to just *buy* a Linksys rather than spend 8 or more hours getting the things set up correctly plus the case for the extra NICs.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    1. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by satterth · · Score: 1
      You may want to check to see how much that Router/firewall box hampers your connection. Find a fast site and download a file a couple times through FTP to get a real average, then disconnect the router/firewall box thing and FTP the same file from the same place.

      You might be surprised. A friend of mine had a Linksys BEFSR11 it was much slower. My 486-66 and ISA network cards with linux was transfering traffic faster than it. I havn't touched a linksys like device since.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    2. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by Selanit · · Score: 2

      Little dedicated routers are cool, but if you need to do it on the cheap, Linux is the way to go.

      It's not necessarily hard, either: Try IPCop. It's a specialized distro that doesn't do anything but be a firewall/router. Web-based administration, similar to what you'd find in a Linksys or Netgear router. Average setup time is about 15 minutes. Runs great on older hardware.

    3. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by shepd · · Score: 1

      8 Hours?

      What are you installing from/to? 5.25" floppies and a 386? It should take no more than 2 hours (including build time), IMHO, to get a basic linux firewall/router box set up.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have over 1600 [slashdot.org] comments? Why Not?

      Ummm...because I have a life.

    5. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by tellezj · · Score: 1

      There are several linux based routers that fit on a single 3.5" floppy. For the novice I'd recommend BBIagent.net.

      --

      End of Line.

    6. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by Royster · · Score: 2

      buy second ethernet card
      install into unused 486
      install linux
      do {
      read firewall HOWTO
      make ipchains rules
      reboot and test
      } until works

      My estimate: 8 hours.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    7. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Ummm...because I have a life.

      Congrats. You're #1 this week.

      #1 to say something unoriginal and PKB, that is.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    8. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by shepd · · Score: 1

      >buy second ethernet card

      Doesn't count, considering the place selling the router has these, and most of us (including yourself) should have one lying around somewhere (I have 6 spare right now).

      >install into unused 486

      30 - 60 seconds...

      >install linux

      30 minutes.

      >read firewall HOWTO

      30 minutes.

      >make ipchains rules

      0 minutes. Rules equivalent to the home routers are included with the howto.

      >reboot and test

      0 minutes. No reboots necessary, this is linux.

      >until works

      Should work first time if you copied/pasted.

      I was being generous in case you decided to install an entire Linux distro on the 486 rather than just what's necessary (486s are embarrasingly slow at decompressing g/bzip archives...).

      Or so that's how long it took for me (1 hour). Well, it took a bit longer since I had an split up/down net connection, but for anyone else, it should be no sweat.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    9. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      No offense, but unless you have a spare box sitting around, $60 is hard to beat.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  222. Simple solution by Space_Nerd · · Score: 1

    Do a ghost of your hard drive before the installer arrives, let him do whatever he wants with your computer, and when he is gone just reinstall the ghost image.

    --
    Everybody has a purpose in life, maybe mine is to lurk in slashdot.
  223. Re:Qwest doesn't get along with anyone except... by symbolic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...smaller companies they can easily push around. I thought about a DSL account, but Qwest, surprise, surprise, is 'incompatible' with Earthlink (at least last time I checked). I swear...it's no wonder that such a small percentage of users have broadband access- pick what you hate dealing with most: too expensive, too invasive, or too much of a hassle. It's all there.

  224. speakeasy.net is linux friendly by e40 · · Score: 2

    they never said a word when I said I was running linux.

    Also, I chose the self install. I can't even remember if it came with a windoze cd-rom. Even if I was running windoze, I would never have installed it. What's the point?

  225. What the software could actually do by Permission+Denied · · Score: 2
    There are basically two categories of software that you may need to run to get your broadband going:
    1. Software to register an account
    2. PPPoE software

    The first software would be run only the first time you get your broadband installed. It would go through the steps of creating an account with a username/password etc. and it may automatically create an email account for you. It would also probably change a few settings (email/DNS server and whatnot) and it may install a "branded" version of IE. This software may also record your MAC address, which is not very nice (this would mean that the service is restricted to the machine with which you run the stupid little program). This is, of course, some stupid Windows program, but you may actually need an account before being able to use the service.

    Hint: sometimes this software is just a little wrapper that invokes IE as a COM object and simply displays web pages. I know that SBC does this. To see if that's the case, right-click in the program and see if you get IE's popup menu. You can then bookmark the page to figure out the URL and you can complete the registration from any web browser instead of using the software.

    Any software used to initially register the service can of course be removed after registering the service.

    The second class of software it might install is PPPoE software (PPP over ethernet). ISPs are increasingly using this to provide DSL and cable service. I don't like this one bit, and I still can't figure out what possible advantage running PPPoE would have at their end except that they may be able to use some older software designed primarily for PPP (eg, RADIUS, mrtg on the PPP server software, etc).

    If your ISP uses PPPoE, you'll need PPPoE software, depending on what OS you run. I believe Windows XP comes with a built-in PPPoE client, I know MacOS X 10.2 does, and I know Windows 9x and MacOS 8-9 definitely do not come with PPPoE software. FreeBSD comes with its own PPPoE client, but Linux usually does not (for Linux, you may have to download "Roaring Penguin PPPoE" - hit google).

    So, the procedure would be: have a Windows box handy when you get your broadband. Since the software might register your MAC, make sure the Windows box has the same MAC address as your eventual NAT box (eg, swap out the NICs if necessary). Install the software and then figure out what it does. You might be able to use the account-creation stuff without their software like I did, but it's probably no big deal to go through their stupid little wizard. Then you figure out what kind of network setup they're using (whether or not it's PPPoE), configure your NAT appropriately, and drop their software.

    If you're new to this, you should know a couple other things: first, you'll want NAT if you have more than one machine. NAT allows you to put all your machines behind your NAT router and your provider only "sees" your NAT box (I'm aware of how ISPs can attempt to detect NAT and how "stealth NAT" can defeat that, so there's no need to go into that here). FreeBSD makes an excellent NAT server that can run on really old hardware (you'll of course need two NICs, but there's no hardware requirements other than that) - the FreeBSD handbook has a section especially on this, and setting up NAT involves simply editing a few lines in /etc/rc.conf (and you'll probably want to install a DHCP server on the inside side of your NAT, and that's only a port install away). It litteraly takes two minutes to set up a FreeBSD NAT box from a default FreeBSD install. There are also several Linux floppy-based distributions that are designed specifically to run NAT.

    The second thing you should know is that some ISPs discourage running servers by make your DHCP-assigned IP "very dynamic" (eg, it changes every few days no matter what). If you still want to be able to ssh into your box, you could use something like dyndns.org, or you could simply write a little script that "publishes" your IP on a web site or something whenever your IP changes.

  226. Software... by thr2k · · Score: 1


    I was a Project Manager for a cable contractor for a number of years. (I have recently moved on to a better job) The cable companies were pretty insistent that we install the software. Their reasoning was that it would help with the quality of service and make it easier to support if a customer calls in. (If everyone has the same setup it is easer to figure out what is wrong) We would with the customers signature leave the software for the customer to install on there own. (The signature was to cover our butt, because they tracked software installs.)
    Also we did not support anything other than a basic Windows/Mac setup (and the techs were not trained to support anything else) We were not "supposed" to install on Linux, Networked systems (unless the customer disconnected the computer from the network), or Duel boot systems.

  227. Charter Pipeline Saint Louis by easter1916 · · Score: 1

    When I had Charter Pipeline installed in south St. Louis county about 2 years ago, the guy asked which PC was to be used as a gateway. I pointed him to the headless Linux box and at that point he said "Well, we don't support that, so the software configuration is something you'll have to do yourself. Just use DHCP to get the settings." Sweet! No nasty spyware there!

  228. After seeing my .. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1, Troll

    .. hot wife, he told me about a great deal they were having. I get a free webcam all hooked up for free. He was even kind enough to set it so it emailed pictures to his private email to so he can be sure everything is working fine.

    I told him that my wife likes to walk around the house naked and he no problems with that either! What a great guy.

    Hrm.. I sure wish he wouldn't have used a 2 inch auger bit to drill a hole in the side of my house though. It's getting a little nipply in here...

  229. Legally speaking... by Royster · · Score: 2

    ...yes, you agreed to all those EULAs.

    I'm suprised no one addressed the real legal question here: can he be held to have agreed to the EULAs that the installer clicked "Yes" on.

    The installer was acting as your agent as you allowed him access to your machine for the purpose of installing the software. Any EULA agreement he agreed binds you as well.

    This is why the old canard about getting a minor to instll software so that the EULAs are not enforcable against you is just an Internet hoax. As soon as you authorize someone to do something, they become your agent.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  230. Hmm by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    I've been hearing alot of stuff like this from people I know all over the place....

    Luckily Adelphia doesn't require that you install /anything/, atleast not in this region. All I gotta do is set the internet-side nic in my machine to use dhcp and *Ta-daa!* done. Now if only they'd take my upstream cap off... :P

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  231. NO REASON FOR SOFTWARE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a cable company in the cable modem division. No reason for that software. The thing that gets me is that I think it's kinda illegal for him to accept a EULA on your machine without you reading or consenting to it. It seems to me that you could rampantly do things that violate the EULA without any reprocussion, since you didn't accept it.

  232. Time-Warner do it yourself kits by migstradamus · · Score: 2

    I picked up a kit from Time-Warner cable here in Manhattan and set it up myself. I never took the included "Road-Runner" CD out of the envelope and I installed nothing. Plus, I run it through a router and firewall. No desire to risk their security sharing my files with a few thousand fellow subscribers.

  233. Don't tell the cable guy about the router by Otto · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'd recommend doing that anyway. Not because of them trying to extort more cash from you (although that's a damn good reason), but because a lot of the cable modem setups out there have the cable installer guy get the MAC address of your PC's network card to phone into the office. Why? So that not every jackass can hook up an off the shelf cable modem, fire up DHCP, get a lease, and run with it. The DHCP server only gives out an IP to the list of verified MAC addresses. Mine does this.

    So if the guy had used the MAC of the router, I'd be unable to connect without the router in the loop. As it stands now, I hid the router (avoiding any cable guy questions), he used the MAC of the PC, and then later I changed the router's WAN MAC to be the same as the PC's MAC. Thus, if the router kicks off one day, I can plug that PC in directly and still have some connectivity for getting technical help on fixing it. Most all SOHO NAT router devices let you change the MAC of the WAN side. Linksys calls it "MAC Cloning" I believe.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  234. Makes no sense by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Premise: Capitalism has been around in some form or another since the dawn of time

    Conclusion: Capitalism is not short-sighted.

    I do not understand how you draw that conclusion from that premise. Care to explain?

    1. Re:Makes no sense by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      What he means is capitalism is really what naturally happends when you give people things to trade with.

      As yes while all of us can remember some time in their lives when they made a short-sighted decision when it came to trading. It really isn't the trading itself that is short-sighted. Like would be kinda like saying breathing is short-sighted. You can't argue it either way, execpt to say umm uhhh hu what?

  235. The contract issue by EEgopher · · Score: 0

    The first thing the courts look at is the existence of a contract. There likely was one, if you signed anything. Read what you sign. If the software procedure was not in the contract, the cable company is in trouble.
    What probably happened is you missed the clause that said: "I authorize the installer to fiddle around on my computer for customary technical and/or market monopoly-building purposes."
    Read what you sign.
    Then sue like hell.

    --
    hi, I like pancakes -.-- -.-- --..
  236. You're right! by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    Wow.. ignorance runs rampant..

    You are so right, Poster boy....

  237. Uhhh, yeah by wiredog · · Score: 2

    that's what I meant. I keep forgetting the second 'c'. Always fun when debugging.

  238. RoadRunner doesn't give a damn what OS I use by boy_afraid · · Score: 1, Informative

    I hear stories of how many weeks went by to get DSL working when I had Cable Model from RR ordered and working on the same day. I went to TW's RR location, picked up my Cable Modem with instructions, went home and installed it myself in 5 minutes. I've had RR's cable model for over 2 years, probably 3 by now, and I've used every Windows, Linux, and a few Mac OSes with NO problems. RR doesn't even care if you use a router, but they won't support you, which is fine by me.

    I LOVE MY BROADBAND ROADRUNNER CABLE MODEL!

  239. Class action fodder by PizzaFace · · Score: 1

    There's a juicy class action waiting here for the right attorney. There are laws against making unauthorized changes to someone's computer system.

  240. consumer advocacy by akb · · Score: 2

    Hopefully the consumer watchdog groups around will pick up on this. Groups like Consumer Federation of America and Consumer's Union (publisher of Consumer Reports do some good work. They are a little slow and behind the times in some ways but they are some of the few groups that confront the cable industry, mostly over the issue of rates. They've been involved in the open access issue which has been important.

    You could also organize your community to be your own consumer advocates, rather than hope these organizations will do it for you. Since its an Internet related issue you'll have a much easier time organizing because the people you want to reach are mainly online. Get in touch with the public utility commission, city council, the local news media and the cable company itself. Usually these people here nothing at all from the public on issues like this, if they get 10 calls they'll piss in their pants. Mail the local Linux Users Group, Internet Society Chapter, and other computer related fora and suggest people do the same.

  241. In Canada by Battle_Ratt · · Score: 1

    Up here in Canada, I had a similar experience with Shaw. In order to prevent them putting whatever software they wanted to install on my system, I had to sign a waiver for each component they wanted to install, saying that I took personal responsibility for the installation. I wasn't required to install them, but if things didn't work it was my problem.
    Now I'm on DSL, and those guys just hand you a box, a disk, and if you want, with a call to customer support, a webpage. This lets you set up the hookup without any of their software installed. You even get to dictate/change the MAC address the modem recognizes as valid.

  242. That poor joe by ianscot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    No need to dump all the anti-corporate conspiracy theory bullshit on the poor joe who gets payed 10 bucks an hour to hookup peoples homes.

    I agree. We're always bitching at the poor telemarketing sales reps, when they're not the ones who set their hours, you know? It's not the installer's fault he's got this list from the main office.

    If you use a little common sense and explain yourself rather than going ballistic, the installer's going to maybe be won over and give other people options, too, rather than "just doing his job." Alienate him, and he'll start thinking of his customers as a bunch of hassles to be gotten through. That's no good for anyone.

    (Seems like cable installers really run a range of attitudes, though. Companies hire out during big install promotions, so you could be dealing with anyone.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:That poor joe by UberOogie · · Score: 3, Interesting
      We're always bitching at the poor telemarketing sales reps, when they're not the ones who set their hours, you know?

      Not even close to a comparable situation. The cable installer is coming at our behest to provide us a service that we paid for. The telemarker is interrupting our lives to try and sell us a product that we asked for no information on after most likely receiving our contact information by the sale of our personal information without our conscent.

      I'm sorry, but get another job. If you know you are going to be inconveniencing people, you have to expect people to be rude right back to you.

      --
      "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
    2. Re:That poor joe by ianscot · · Score: 2
      Not even close to a comparable situation.
      ...I'm sorry, but get another job.

      The difference you're talking about has to do with the company behind the situation, not the person making the call or installing the cable. They're a working stiff, they got a canned list of stuff from the mothership. Similar deal, from their POV, which you don't seem to care much about.

      There are lots of better ways to discourage telemarketing companies than being bitter toward the callers. What's your solution to road rage -- cussing at the other drivers to use their signals? That's about as effective as being rude to 21-year-old working mothers with crap jobs.

      Telling them to "get another job" is really heartfelt advice, clearly. They know that, they're trying to get by. Who is it you think works those jobs, Enron CEOs trying to pay their debts to society?

      --
      "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    3. Re:That poor joe by UberOogie · · Score: 2
      They're a working stiff, they got a canned list of stuff from the mothership. Similar deal, from their POV, which you don't seem to care much about.

      Damn straight I don't care. My capacity for caring ends when I am interrupted for an advertising pitch.

      There are lots of better ways to discourage telemarketing companies than being bitter toward the callers. What's your solution to road rage -- cussing at the other drivers to use their signals?

      Wow, it is just bad analogy day. The original poster said that telemarketers interrupting our lives and cable installers should expect the same level of politeness. I say that is not the case, because the cable installer is providing a service we asked for and the telemarketer is basically a salesperson invading your home. I'm not saying people should be rude to them, but given their profession is, by its nature, rude, they shouldn't be surprised if people are.

      Telling them to "get another job" is really heartfelt advice, clearly. They know that, they're trying to get by.

      Nice try at sarcasm, chief. Come back when they teach you fractions. If they know they are going to perform an intrusive annoyance to people, they can't expect that people won't be rude to them. If their feelings are so fragile, they should get a job in the service industry, which are just as shitty, but at least they are on the right side of the line.

      --
      "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
    4. Re:That poor joe by mr_exit · · Score: 2

      I live in New Zealand so your mileage may vary...

      When I got hooked up with DSL we were recommended a certain installer (his name was jeff or garry or something), So when we rung up to make an appointment it was a simple case of asking for him... the operator on the other end thought it crazy that anyone would wait a week to get a specific installer (the average was 2 days, yes drool if you want)

      So this guy rolls up, notices KDE on the desktop... says that linux is an unsupported operating system etc but he has to check that it works.... so after installing it all And doing a beautiful job with the wireing and installation into the wall, he whips out his notebook and lo and behold... its running linux. He plugs into our connection, runs the router config script he had, then to check, he opens up the slashdot homepage!....

      He then closes his notebook, hands us a piece of paper that he had prepared with all the numbers we need, and some handy links about setting up pinholes with the supplied router, then goes on his way....

      so the moral of the story???? ask your friends if they had a good experience.... get someone who knows what they are doing

      --

      -------
      Drink Coffee - Do Stupid Things Faster And With More Energy!
  243. What broadjump does by Que_Ball · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well I work for an ISP that uses broadjump for our client install CD. Basically broadjump as a company specializes in making these CD's that automatically check the system and do any neccesary steps for getting your broadband connection working.

    In our case the CD will install a branded internet explorer/outlook express but it's just something they whiped up with the IEAK tools so nothing too special.

    The big step on our network is it will register the MAC address on our customer administration webpage. Broadjump basically builds the CD to the specifications the ISP asks for. They are simply an outsourcer that specializes in these things. On our CD there are basically 3 steps. First the CD checks the machine to make sure it meets the minimum requirements. So it checks the basics like CPU speed, free hard drive space and memory. It also verifies there is an Ethernet card and that it's bound to the TCP/IP protocol with the proper DHCP settings. If it finds any problems with these settings it will give the user the opportunity to automatically fix the error or a description of the problem so you can fix it yourself. The next step is it will install the internet explorer software. After this it does a dhcp release and renew to get an IP. It then contacts the customer administration website to register the MAC address so that the computer can get a valid IP. Up to this point the machine only has a 10.x.x.x IP address which only allows you to connect to the DHCP server, DNS server, and the online customer administration servers. After it successfully registers the MAC it does another release and renew which should give you a real IP address and it uploads a text file log of the whole process to an FTP site. The text file doesn't really contain anything terribly useful and nobody on the helpdesk ever bothers with the things. Nothing evil was included in our text file though I'm sure other ISP's may ask broadjump to include some system configuration details in their implementations. Like I said, for us it's just a log file of the steps the broadjump CD completed. If it got to the point where it succesfully uploaded the file then the connection is obviously working and at that point there isn't going to be much to say in the log file of interest.

    All the steps this CD takes can easily be duplicated manually. In fact most of the time if a user calls the helpdesk because they cannot get their new connection up and running we just register the MAC address manually on the website for them. Registering this address automatically is the main reason we include the CD in the self install packages. I do recommend people unfamilear with DHCP and mac addresses to use the CD on our system, there isn't anything terribly mysterious about our broadjump cd though who knows what other ISP's ask them to implement.

    In general there are only a few methods of broadband client access that users need to be familear with to get up and running manually without these CD's.
    1. Plain DHCP or Static address. Most cable modems work on simple DHCP addresses. Usually the cable ISP will hack their DHCP server to only allocate a certain number of unique IP's through a single cable modem. I know the cable ISP I used to work for did this. After the first 2 IP's included in a consumer package it would just keep sending a DHCP offer of the second IP address to any additional computer that sent a request from that cable modem. The system programmer there hacked a neat little system together using SNMP and DHCP. SNMP trap would be sent to the DHCP server with the sequence number of the DHCP request and serial number of the cable modem.
    2. DHCP with Mac address or hostname registration. The ISP I'm working for uses the MAC address to limit the number of IP's you can get. A web interface to register these MAC addresses is available and before you register you are assigned a private IP address in the 10.x.x.x range which only works inside a small internal network segment the DNS, DHCP, and registration server are on. I have also seen ISP's that use the hostname as a unique identifier. Usually this involves setting the name of the computer to be your ISP username to get a valid IP.
    3. PPPoE. An extention of the dialup authentication model to broadband connections. Usually you will need some form of client software for these though most routers have built a PPPoE clients into their firmware. MacosX also includes out of the box support for this protocol. You will need to use a username and password to authenticate with the network to allow traffic to pass to the internet. Seems to be most popular with DSL providers probably because of their dialup heritage.
    4. Custom client/logon. As seen in the roadrunner cable modem networks. A custom authentication method can be used that usually contacts a server to authenticate the user in a fashion similar in structure to PPPoE. In the case of roadrunner their client has been thouroghly reverse engineered so if you are running an alternate OS you should find a client available to keep you logged in. The proprietary method of authentication will probably become extinct as industry standard solutions are cheaper and easier for broadband providers to implement. If you are saddled by this method of authentication just check around for a third party client. It will probably provide some benefits over the standard client like automatic keep alives so your connection doesn't time out.

    1. Re:What broadjump does by Phil+Karn · · Score: 2

      Roadrunner dumped their proprietary login client years ago. At least they did here in San Diego, and I'm pretty sure it was done nationally.

  244. Re: router MACs by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

    ditto. One more comment though. Our network guy told me (and I'm wondering if anyone else has input here) that a router has a MAC in a different range, so the cable company would "know" it was a router, so you are better off cloning your PC's MAC even if you can get an IP.

  245. Mine was simple by doobie · · Score: 1
    "Oh you are running Linux? We don't support that so hopefully you can get it working yourself, I'll just use my laptop to ensure the cable modem works."


    He then hooked up the cable modem to his laptop, asks me to for some website, I gave him a web address and he brought it up, and asked if there was any other website I'd like to see to ensure the cable modem was working, then asked me to sign the paper saying it worked... My kind of cable modem company....

  246. On my DSL service.... by newestbob · · Score: 1, Interesting
    ...about once a month it goes down for an hour or so. The red "LINE ERROR" light on the DSL modem blinks, indicating--according to the manual for the DSL modem--that the problem is on the "phone line" end of it.

    Nevertheless, before customer service will escalate it to the guy who tries to detect my modem from the CO end of things, I have to tell them what OS I'm running, pretend that I'm checking things in the control panel, prentend that I'm rebooting it, etc.

    If I had enoug free time, I'd video the red light blinking, and take the modem manual to court with me--to sue them for wasting my time. I'd probably lose, but (maybe) some exec at the company would change the customer service script to skip all that bullshit if the RED LINE ERROR LIGHT is blinking!

  247. Well, it's more like by devphil · · Score: 2


    3.5) Booted into Windows long enough to run install CD -- because that activates my account, and lets me set a username/password for the stupid PPPoE software they're running.

    4) [as before]

    5) Uninstall crap from Windows box, reboot into Linux.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Well, it's more like by monthos · · Score: 1

      i use a local based isp, and already had my account created for me, none of that crappy account creation software bs for me. i still dont like pppoe though, but its not as much of a pain in teh ass as everyone wants to make it out to be.

    2. Re:Well, it's more like by alzoron · · Score: 1

      just get a decent router that does the PPPoE stuff and skip the windows step completely

    3. Re:Well, it's more like by devphil · · Score: 2


      That's what I have (Linksys). But the account still has to be turned on, and the PPPoE password set, and both of those can only be done through their crappy windows software.

      After that's done, I tell the router the PPPoE username and password (otherwise nothing works), and now both Linux and Windows simply speak to the local net. Yay Linksys.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  248. rabid power-users by ducktape · · Score: 5, Informative

    as an employee of (cable company name removed) i can tell you exactly what it does. it isn't spyware or ad-ware. i predicted when we were first told about this new tool that this story would show up on slashdot. hence i had several questions when i first got it, and even went so far as to contact a member of the development team about it.

    the software has 2 major functions-

    a) -secure software that allows technical support to connect (by proxy) to a remote machine to perform a myriad of tasks. it can push urls, view TCP/IP related (only) connection info in cases of slow-speed troubleshooting, and even has a function to allow the technician to troubleshoot further by using a remote VNC-like application.

    this may sound scary, but read on. the software leaves no open ports, and cannot be remotely-accessed without the user activating the software (at a tech's request). the user must then manually connect to a closed server with an auth code that the tech gives. the tech connects to the server, and may be allowed any of the above tasks if authorized by the user. the customer is told clearly what will be done, and the tech explains what he/she is doing before proceeding. there are strict policies for the use of this software. the technician is not allowed to browse the hard-drive, download/install/troubleshoot any application that is not on the supported list, and is under no circumstances allowed to change anything on the user's computer without explicit permission. i can't stress this enough, in order for any kind of connection or action to take place the software will ask the user if it's ok to proceed with on-screen alerts! the user may break the connection at anytime during the process for any reason by clicking a button on the taskbar.

    since the connection takes place through a single closed, proprietary server there is virtually no chance of this application being used as a backdoor. the software is hardcoded with the URL of the server, and can connect ONLY to that server and nothing else. even if someone malicious were to get a hold of the client software, without (password protected) access to the server to generate a short-time auth code for the user to type in, it's useless.

    b) -a backup/restore application for tcp/ip and connection property settings. it's configured to save driver files for the NIC and USB modem devices, ip address/subnet mask and DNS property information (in cases where specified), and occasional pings and traces to the dhcp server, gateway, and dns servers along with netstat info. the software catalogues the information bi-weekly, and stores it on the hard-drive. none of this information (save the pings and traces) can be retrieved by anyone outside the system. it's mostly used for cases where the user breaks the connection by altering configuration. the backups allow the user to restore the connection settings to a previous known-working configuration.

    that all.

    this isn't a data-mining application. privacy was discussed in detail in software-training. i understand being cautious, (hell, i'll admit i was concerned as hell when it was first announced) but i can tell you in all honesty that the bundle on our 'easy installer' cd's contains no spyware. broadjump was contracted to write the software specifically for our use, and no 'add-on' click-tracking or cookie-scouring was allowed.

    the client software is ONLY in the hands of tier-2 and above, highly-skilled, highly trained and QA/policy monitored technicians. the broad-jump software is a means to an end for technical-support. if you've had any experience supporting win9x systems you know that windows can be downright retarded when it comes to connection management. it has been an invaluable tool when faced with users who doesn't know their right mouse-button from their left. thus far it's been a huge success, customers seem to love it, it allows us to do all the work, while they just watch and keep tabs or relax as they see fit.

    i knew there would be a few who flipped out over this application. but really, the only people who get up in arms about it are those who don't need it. if you're smart enough to understand what this software does, you should be smart enough to understand that there is a genuine need for it. it's the people who call tech support complaining about error 691's with their caps lock key on, or who've lost the address bar in IE who need it. if you're not comfortable with the application, uninstall it.

  249. Re: router MACs by aridhol · · Score: 2
    a router has a MAC in a different range
    IIRC, the range of your MAC address is determined by the manufacturer of your ethernet chip. There is a list of assigned ethernet addresses.

    So yes, your router may have a MAC in a different range from your NIC, as will your neighbour's NIC (unless you use the ISP-provided NIC). Of course, if your NIC and router are both made by the same company (LinkSys, maybe?), they could have MACs in the same range.

    --
    I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
  250. Spyware by siskbc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You also have to remember, we (the ./ community) tend to be a lot less trusting and paranoid than the rest of the world (rightly or wrongly), and I really don't think most people care about spyware. Given that we're quite the minority, I don't necessarily think the company is so *evil.* If they won't let you have your modem install without the stuff, it's more likely due to inflexible bureaucrats than any conspiracy.

    That said, I hate telemarketers and do hold people responsible for the jobs that they hold. Are the Phillip Morris scientists not responsible for their lack of integrity just because "their boss told them so?" Arguements of "I was following orders" don't fly too well.

    I would have to be on the verge of death from starvation to work as a telemarketer. If then.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Spyware by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I was just following orders didn't work for the Nazi's either.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:Spyware by HiThere · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      How do you distinguish between inflexible bureaucrats and a conspiracy?

      I know the typical image of a conspiracy is a *small* bunch of people of people gathered together in a darkened room... but that's just drama. People only hide their identity as conspiracy members if they think someone is out to get them for it. If you're part of a powerful one, like a corporation, then you don't need to bother with that.

      What? You don't think that a corporation is inherently a conspiracy? Then what do you think a conspiracy is? Unions, corporations, businessmen's clubs, gardening clubs, are all coeteries of people gathered together to enforce their vision upon a resisting world. They are all people "breathing together" in meetings (which is what the word means, if you follow it's roots).

      Now if you want to justify some more restricted definition (reasonable, as the contexts in which it is used seem to imply that some more restrictive meaning is needed), then you need to specify what the definition should be. But just looking at the physical observables, it seems to me that telecom corporations count as conspiracies. (Any you've got to include the employees. You don't have a conspiracy without followers as well as leaders.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Spyware by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      I really don't think most people care about spyware.

      It depends. Most teenagers whom I told about spyware didn't care... most adults however look at you with disbelief and say "they can't really do that, do they?". One of my closest friends, who is a marketing major, started muttering: "but...but...that's illegal!" (or something in the lines).
      Just try to explain it to anyone you see using Kazaa or other spyware infested software (yes, I know about Kazaa Lite), oh, and don't just say "it contains spyware". That doesn't say a damn think to them. Make it a little bit more vivid and make them think there sits a nasty little monster in their computer that sends everything they surf/do on their computer to a "Big Bad Corporation(tm)".

    4. Re:Spyware by Wiener · · Score: 1
      didn't work for the Nazi's either

      I now declare this thread dead.

    5. Re:Spyware by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      That's what I was aiming for.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  251. My cable rocks. by miffo.swe · · Score: 2

    I like it really much because its provided by my landlord. We are roughly about 150 households that shares a 2/mbit line and since not everyone uses the internet its pretty fast. I get typically around 500kbit/s so i dont complain. Best of all it doesnt have anything between me and the internet. It had a proxy/firewall at first but all the complaints about closed ports made them take the unbelievable sane decision of completely removing the firewall. All i have to have is an os with a DHCP client and ethernet. This enables almost every existing OS today and doesnt exclude anything.

    Im all satisfied but im lucky, most people here in sweden use Telia and they suck hard.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  252. what cable company is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I got my cable modem you could self install it. All the cable guy did was hookup the cable wiring and that's it unless you wanted him to install the useless software... So what cable company are you using? I'm using COX

  253. well you could always do this by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    Zonealarm:
    Broadjump Client Foundation: access internet: never.

    Done.

    --
    -Styopa
  254. Re:Have a honeypot - an old MAC by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1
    A friend once had an old MAC that did not support DHCP

    Ummm, there has never been a Mac with Ethernet that could not support DHCP.

    --
    There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
  255. what i did.... by 95_gst_al · · Score: 1

    when the guy got to my house i was running winme on an old hard drive i never use. i watched him install while i acted like i was more interested in the tv show that was on. when he was ready to leave he asked me to sign his paperwork. i did. then i asked what all he installed. he said it was just drivers and that he also setup microsoft outlook to coneect to my new isp email account. i was like cool man, thanks! when he was leaving, i asked if he left the "driver disk" he used in the box. he said he couldnt, because that was the only disk he had. then i said well let me copy it incase i have to rebuild windows if it crashes. this is the best part. he said you dont need a driver disk to install it. it finds the driver when you reinstall windows me. he stopped and thought what he just said and said sorry but i have another install to finish before i go home. i started laughing and said thanks man.

    --
    When all else fails, piss on it. At least you will feel better in some kind of way.
  256. PPPoE is a wasteful protocol by StupidKatz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As explained to me, PPPoE requires more "overhead" per packet than plain Ethernet. That, in addition to the dial-up-like delay and inability to keep an IP address causes me to go right to the "little guy" ISP if at all possible. I frankly would prefer cable over DSL with PPPoE... It's all about squeezing every last dime from the customers.

    1. Re:PPPoE is a wasteful protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PPoE does have another prefix (or suffix maybe) in encapsulation, but the performance hit is negligible.

    2. Re:PPPoE is a wasteful protocol by Mr.+Shiny+And+New · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's all about squeezing every last dime from the customers.

      Actually, It's about more than that. PPPoE adds support for things like authentication which makes it easier to support multiple ISPs on one physical network. That's the reason PPPoE was deployed in Ontario, Canada. The phone company was forced by the govt to resell its ADSL service to competitors at a bulk rate, to allow competition. This meant that there was now multiple providers on the same network, and the ADSL network behaves a lot like ethernet. Thus, to allow things like metering and authentication and lots of other things that ISPs might care about, a new protocol had to be deployed over the existing one. Hence, PPPoE.

      Yes, PPPoE is a pain in it's "dial-up" like nature. Yes, it does have some overhead over ethernet. However, it does allow for competition. Which is a good thing. As for the inability to keep an IP address, well, nothing says that you'll always get the same IP address using DHCP.

      Also, I bet that in certain areas of the world the Cable companies will also start using PPPoE once the regulators start making them resell bandwidth too. I hate the thought, since I also like DHCP better, but it's the way of the world: Physical networks are prohibitively expensive. So to enable competition, you have to share them.

    3. Re:PPPoE is a wasteful protocol by mini+me · · Score: 1

      I live in Ontario, have ADSL but do not have to use PPPoE. IPs are assigned via DHCP, or a static IP can be had for a price (mind you that price is way too high). The secret is to not have Bell as your telco!

      Competion is good, but if it means having to put up with things like PPPoE then I think I'd rather have a monopoly. Ethernet is a fine standard, there is no need to add another layer on top of it!

    4. Re:PPPoE is a wasteful protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think you can still get your IP assigned by DHCP and use PPPoE. Bell techs usually suggest you do this whenever call to complain about your modem having problems syncing up with the network.

      As for not having Bell as your Telco, it doesn't really matter who your Telco is. You can still sign on with whatever ISP you wish. The only problem is that there may be a longer wait if you sign up with someone that's using Bell DSLAMs because setting up your account on the system will be a lower priority than for Bell customers.

  257. Couldn't say. by demon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't even have a bootable Windows install on my box at home. When I called up to order cable service, I told them "I'm running Linux." The reply? "We can't support that, you'll have to support yourself." "That's fine, I know what I'm doing." Tech shows up, and his form says "Windows XP". So I told him no, not XP, Linux. He was like, ok, I want to learn about this Linux thing. I typed in EXACTLY ONE COMMAND: "dhclient eth0". It proceeded to get an IP address and work without a hitch. (This was with TW RoadRunner service.)

    At least they allow the support yourself option, unlike the early days I heard about from other people I knew, where they had to plug in a Windows box just for the install, otherwise the installer will say "no, we can't do that!" The spyware they could've gotten away with (and probably did) then... geez, it's pretty sad.

    --

    Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
    Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  258. Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think most folk are missing the point here. No disrespect to those who posted their ways around the problem. Kudos to you for knowing how to set up IP.

    The point is that most internet users don't even know what an IP is. They don't care about linux, and they probably aren't even aware that there could be software doing "bad things" on their PC. These users are having spyware forced upon them in two ways:

    • The tech did the EULA for them without consulting them
    • The contract demands the software to be installed

    This is a serious problem. Let's actually discuss ways to resolve it for everyone, rather than trying to make ourselves look clever.

    1. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      IMHO it's not easy to do anything about this. You have to get lots of people involved -- get the masses all stirred about about a number of concepts that they're not familiar with and therefore don't care about. It would help if these evil policies were putting a hurt on people's wallets, but that's probably not the case -- perhaps even the opposite.

      Seriously, the only reasonable chance that I can think of for putting a stop to this kind of abuse by a cable company or an ISP involves getting the law changed. This is a strategy that would also require the participation of lots of people, but at least they could all be geeks.

      Or maybe that would not even be necessary. It's possible that the (local) law is already on the side of the consumer, but that nobody has done any research yet to determine which laws apply.

      In this case it could also be that the cable provider in question is already one step ahead, and may be one of the reasons that they want those signatures. If so, it might be that the best you could hope for would be to force them to explain to the customers what they wanted to install on their PCs, and then to let them decide whether they wanted to opt out or not.

    2. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by scoove · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, the only reasonable chance that I can think of ...involves getting the law changed.

      Aarrrrggg!

      We technical-aware people are our own worst enemy, and we ought to *know better*.

      This kind of advocacy only sets up false economies (read about rent control in NYC, please) which skew supply/demand to an extreme, and also subvert our rights to an administrative authority who has ulterior motives (e.g. king/emperor/dictator).

      There's a really simple model that is well communicated in Ed Yourdon's book, Deathmarch Projects, and the model works well for technical and nontechnical decisions - even deciding what to have for dinner.

      Here's a summary of the model (apologies to those that get this and find it redundant - you're not the ones I'm trying to help):

      RULE 1: You have three variables: Time, Money, Functionality.

      RULE 2: You can solve for one variable as your primary focus, and maybe a second one as a secondary emphasis.

      RULE 3: You cannot solve for all three.

      Examples:

      I've only got $3. I need my lunch in 5 minutes. (1-Money, 2-Time. Don't count on a 5-course meal prepared just for you.)

      I want $30 broadband. I want someone to deliver it to me and have it working quickly. (1-Money, 2-Time, prepare to sacrifice functionality)

      I need a T1 yesterday. It's gotta do all sorts of VPN, firewalling, filtering, etc. (1-Time, 2-Functionality, open your wallet up!)

      I need a very fancy house. I'm pretty short of money right now. (1-Functionality, 2-Money, better get your work clothes on...)

      So... what do you make of:

      I want cheap broadband. It should come in a convienent package and be installed this week. But it had better not have any spyware, had better work just the way I want, with my OS of choice, allow me to do whatever I want and have no limits.

      Solving for all three... if the last two are important to you, you can have it. But count on $75/hour or more...

      *scoove*

    3. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Let's actually discuss ways to resolve it for everyone, rather than trying to make ourselves look clever.

      If indeed the contract demands the software to be installed (and it wasn't just the tech making that up to make his job easier), then the resolution is really simple, you get lots of angry customers to write to the regulatory authorities and force the company to change its contract.

    4. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3
      you get lots of angry customers to write to the regulatory authorities

      That's half the problem here; most people don't know there is a problem.

      My take on it is this; right now the internet is a novelty for most people. Once you get past the filth stage, you begin to use it more and more. I would now say I'm dependant on it, for example I haven't picked up a phone book in years. It's a change in behaviour for most people, I guess for a lot of us (especially those from an scientific/engineering background) the logic of looking up an answer is second-nature. As time goes by, Joe Sixpack will become more at ease with looking up information on the net, and it will become essentially an utility, like gas, the telephone and electricity.

      Contrast that with the modern media; all they care about is ratings. They don't report "the news" as such, what they really do is report on the topics that people are interested in. Guns, war, car crashes, death, sport, that sort of thing.

      My hope is that once the internet becomes more and more prevailent in our society (3G mobiles may be the catalyst), then the media will start to pick up on this sort of thing. Right now, stories about e-cards raping your address book and the every growing trend of spyware won't buy them ratings, so they don't care about it. When the internet hits a critical mass, then people will begin to care and the media will start to cover it.

      Right now, it's a very interesting time. The future of the internet is being determined today. The lawsuits are setting precidents that will shape the internet for years to come. Yet, with all this communication power, we still haven't found a way to organise the like-minded people.

      Slashdot comes close; it's a good way to see and debate differing opinions. However, it's like the rainforest scares of the last decade; people became aware of a problem, discussed it, decided something must be done. Then they lost interest, it became no longer a "sexy" subject to the media and was forgotten. But did anything change? The problem is still there. Focus shifted elsewhere while we got the heart-warming illusion of making the world a better place.

      We need to organise. It's been done before, for example here in the UK there was a bill proposed to allow everyman and his dog to have access to your phone/bank/net records. Overnight a grassroots organisate grew, started talking to their government representatives and essentially told them where to shove it.

      But, how? The above was a fluke really, it won't likely happen again, as least not as regularly as it should. We need a proper way to do this. We need to remind the governments of the so-called "free world" newspeak that we are supposed to be in a democracy, where the will of the people is supposed to shape the countries. The internet could be the best thing ever to happen to the idea of a democracy, but unless people take action instead of just passing motions to go and rescure Brian from the Romans, then we're not going anywhere.

    5. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is an IP? IP is a network layer, perhaps you mean IP ADDRESS?

    6. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by LintMan · · Score: 1
      I don't see how mandatory undisclosed installation of spyware is tied to any of your three time/money/functionality (faster/cheaper/better) points.

      I guess you can argue that the spyware subsidizes the costs in some marginal way, but I'd say that it is a direct negative against the functionality/better point, and note that plenty of other cable ISP's in general likely provide similar quality/cost service sans spyware.

      I want cheap broadband. It should come in a convienent package and be installed this week. But it had better not have any spyware, had better work just the way I want, with my OS of choice, allow me to do whatever I want and have no limits.

      Most broadband services arguably provide exactly that, or something close to it. The *only* issue is the sneaky spyware installation. As I see it, your analogy just doesn't apply here. The spyware is not a trade off; it has almost no merit to be considered on the faster/better/cheaper spectrum.

    7. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Well... I think we all can agree on a couple of points to start with:

      1. Programmers, sysadmins, and the technically savvy will probably set up a sacrificial windows box, let the technician fool around for a while to demonstrate that the box is "up", smile a lot, play dumb, and as soon as the tech leaves, clobber the windows box with Red Hat (or some other) Linux, using DHCP to maintain the connection (which was so easy on Red Hat I had to laugh). Or am I alone in this? The friends and relatives of the savvy will also be taken care of, because the savvy will care enough to want to help.

      2. However, the technically naiive who DON'T have technically savvy friends or relatives are basically screwed. They have neither the background knowledge nor the desire to develop an understanding of what the computer is and what it does.

      Consider this analogy: A carpenter might have a circular saw. But he'll probably use it with safety glasses, leather gloves, and a lot of care. The carpenter's parents will have the benefit of the saw, but the carpenter will be wielding it. Ditto for the carpenter's wife. SOMEONE knowledgeable is working the saw.

      The Carpenter's neighbor is a banker, who's never touched a tool in his life. He doesn't want to read about how to use the tool, he doesn't want to use safety equipment, but he won't ask someone else to help him out either. But he wants tools, and he's bought into all the commercials which say circular saws are easy to use and safe, too. One even says "It's so easy my son can do it" so he laughs off the idea that maybe he should talk to a carpenter first, he buys a big powerful saw and fires it up, goes straight for the wood, hits a knot and slices off his thumb and three fingers. Whoops!

      Of course, he later sues the saw company, which puts a warning label on the saw that "Stupid people should not operate this device." Everyone ignores the label, because after all, THEY'RE not stupid.

      Think about it.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    8. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by afidel · · Score: 2

      The government has already gone to the extreme of setting up a regulated monopoly, now we just need to use the public utilities commision to ensure that the public good is balanced with the monopoly power bestowed upon the utility. If the utility requires privacy invading software as a condition of service then this should either be allowed or disallowed by the utility commision, not left to the whim of the corporation. Here in Ohio for instance they PUCO has gone to the extreme of forcing the ILEC's to restore service with a minimum payment, even if the customer will likely never repay the back fees owed in full. It was seen as a public good that the ILEC be forced to eat some losses to ensure that poor people were able to get back on their feet.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by sco08y · · Score: 1

      That's half the problem here; most people don't know there is a problem.

      I've got to wonder: if they're completely unaware of it, is it a problem?

      I write software (That other people use!) so I keep my machine free of wierd random crap.

      But for most people, is there really any harm from all that spyware?

      The ads are a PITA, but most people just tune them out. Their brains are better filters than anything we could cook up.

      I agree that fraud is a problem, but I can put a price tag on fraud. We should be sure that we're not spending a whole lot of money educating people about spyware, only to find out it doesn't make a dent in the fraud.

      Then they lost interest, it became no longer a "sexy" subject to the media and was forgotten.

      Give people some credit: many of these problems lose their appeal because they either get solved or more important problems arise.

      If you really do want to solve problems, you have to start with the assumption that people are capable problem-solvers and good at prioritizing.

    10. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      I would now say I'm dependant on [the internet], for example I haven't picked up a phone book in years.

      As an aside, I once had someone complain to me on IM for a half hour that they couldn't find the number for Sprint's technical support on the Sprint webpage. I finally got sick of listening to him, and sent him an IM with the phone number. He asked me where I found it, and I told him - the phone book. He looked down to notice that his foot was resting on a phone book the whole time.

      So I guess it is safe to throw away your phone books, but only if you have me on your buddy list :).

      Back to the on-topic discussion, yes, most people don't realize that they're being spied on. But ultimately the only real solution to the problem is education. If you think it's a big enough problem that it's worth solving, buy some ads pointing out the problems and sell consulting services fixing it. Personally I don't think it's a big enough deal to most people to bother, though. So what if your cable company knows what type of computers you're using to access the internet?

    11. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by balloonhead · · Score: 2
      Don't most of you guys live in the US?

      can't you sue for a load of money for this?

      It would certainly be a lot less frivolous than most of the crap that picks up a huge payola in your courts.

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
    12. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is an IP? IP is a network layer, perhaps you mean IP ADDRESS?

      Try not to let yourself get distracted from the topic, dick.

    13. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by sangretoro · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. But the only reasonable way to have a modicum of control over your system is with free software. Linux cannot be dismissed out of hand. It is sufficiently easy for anyone to use nowadays. And, many people are. Most people that I know, from my friends, family, to my doctor are using Linux. And it's a trend that can only help the consumer, individual and citizen.

    14. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      But for most people, is there really any harm from all that spyware?

      Of course there is harm...everything they do is logged and sent to the owner of the spyware. How would you feel if your TV watching habits were being tracked? Or every book, magazine and newspaper, with records down to the detail about what articles you read and for how long? Or, by looking at your e-mail, they find the e-mail addresses of your friends and family and start to bother them?

      Then all this information is sold to anyone with a wallet and used to target you for mass marketing schemes. That's bad. I like my privacy, thank you very much.

      Give people some credit: many of these problems lose their appeal because they either get solved or more important problems arise

      So, the rainforests are doing just fine now? Third-world countries are no longer in huge debt to the west, with their population starving and fighting over the last scraps, meanwhile enduring an aids epidemic, while the pharmacutical companies lap up the profits...?

      These things were public scares, just off the top of my head. Nothing changed and we just forgot about them. Yet we have some sort of delusional satisfaction that we learned about the problem and are somehow a better people for it?

    15. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      So what if your cable company knows what type of computers you're using to access the internet?

      That's not what they are tracking though, some are also recording your web usage and that is a major no-no in my book...

    16. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      Don't most of you guys live in the US?

      Personally, no...

      can't you sue for a load of money for this?

      For what? They didn't break any existing laws and you agreed to it (in the small print) in your contract. Technically they haven't done anything wrong...

    17. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      True, but how long will it be before viruses and spyware start to appear on linux? There is no technical reason why either can't happen (especially amoungst non-techy users). The open source aspect is important, true, but once pre-compiled binaries become popular, then the problem returns.

      We need laws to regulate privacy, not just from the authorities, but also from these third-parties.

    18. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      That's not what they are tracking though, some are also recording your web usage and that is a major no-no in my book...

      But that's information they already have since you're connecting to those websites through them anyway.

    19. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by Gareman · · Score: 1

      It's basic plumbing. I want a cheap pipe coming into my home. I want things to flow through it properly in both directions. I'm not asking for an 800 number to discuss the relative merits of copper vs. PVC. I'm not demanding that I be able to flush an elephant down my toilet. The only reason Broadband is any different than basic plumbing is because we allow it to be that way. --gary

    20. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by balloonhead · · Score: 2
      Yeah, sure it's in the contract, but have you seen some of the stuff that gets through the courts over there?

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  259. This stopped them ... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 2

    TW Cable guy came to install broadband on my hex-wife's computer. It was an older box I put together, and the floppy drive and CD wouldn't read his installer. I tried to talk him through some things over the phone, but as with most of these installers, he just followed his list. I convinced him to leave the NIC installed and I would install the software later that night.

    I showed up later and cleaned the CD-ROM, but the floppy was toast (drivers were on a floppy). So, following normal geek instinct, I accessed the web using the existing dial up, downloaded just the drivers for the NIC, fired everything up, and my daughter was jumping for joy within 5 minutes. I never did install the CD software.

    So the next time the cable guy shows up to install something, disable the CD and floppy and do it yourself later.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
  260. Alternative approach by scoove · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I NEVER let anyone install any software on my company computers or my home computers that deal with broadband.

    This approach may get you permanently relegated to the slow lane of the Internet, if that (hint: what do you think your AOL or Earthlink connection does, especially upstream? Do you think they ignore all that nifty consumer buyer profile data they see pass through web proxies and such?)

    As a Cox.net consumer and manager of a regional broadband service provider (not cox - we service flyover country:-) ), I'd suggest a better alternative:

    - supply a stock Wintel PC next to your cable modem/DSL/wireless DSL termination. Win2K or WinXP are probably necessary.
    - use the stock machine for the installer to load his garbage on
    - use the machine for customer support calls
    - let it crunch keys or run some other distributive application
    - replace it in the link for normal operation using your router/internet sharing device of choice (e.g. RouterOS, Linux dual-nic, Linksys firewall router, etc)

    Just make sure you get the details down of how your service provider authenticates you and let you on his network - PPPoE, DHCP, MAC-based authentication, etc. and make sure your router solution is configured to do the same.

    Yea, I hate spyware and won't use it on my network either...

    *scoove*

    1. Re:Alternative approach by valmont · · Score: 2


      would you mind backing-up your allegations about EarthLink with more substantive meat? i am curious.

    2. Re:Alternative approach by msfodder · · Score: 1

      I would never stock a POS machine next to my dedicated firewall/router just because some joker thinks he is going to install software that I never agreed to.

      It's insane even to suggest that a customer should have to do this so they can get the service they pay for.

      If they start rate limiting my connection there are a number of things I can do about that, all of which cost them money.
      I think your "advice" is very bad.
      --
      ..Free Live Free...
  261. Contact your local news media by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the software; the cable guy did. And is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have this software on their computers is pretty high.

    If this is a local provider, break the story to the local news media (tv/newspaper/radio.. whoever will listen). Do some research as to how this garbage spyware will invade customers' privacy. And let the media know that this software can be removed easily. Maybe that'll get the word out.

  262. Why did you let him in your house? by stonewolf · · Score: 2

    There is no technical reason to send an installer to install either DSL or a cable modem. It costs the cable company between $200 and $500 to send a truck to your house. Therefore, you have to conclude that the ONLY reason they sent him was so that he would install that software on your computer.

    Most cable and DSL companies are doing everything they can to keep from having to roll a truck to do an install. So, you must conclude that getting that software on your machine is worth at least $300 a year to your cable company.

    You have to assume that it is spyware of the worst sort.

    Stonewolf

    1. Re:Why did you let him in your house? by brett42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, since a lot of computers are pretty far away from cable jacks, so getting someone to get your modem connected for you is pretty convenient. Plus I've noticed that a lot of installs require either installing a NIC or setting up drivers for USB devices, which might be a bit hard for some users.

  263. Most (smarter) people are untrusting. by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

    It's just that while the more intelligent folks are less willing to trust things in the physical world without more explanations or research, they may not know much about things that deal with computers. NO ONE I know likes spyware... the problem is, not many know what to look for. They're told they need to install a program, so what choice do they have? This is somewhat similar to taking a car to a shady mechanic; unless you're clued in, they can take your pocketbook for a ride.

  264. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  265. My ADSL installation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Go to Telocity's website, order ADSL. Wait a month for the box to show up at my door via Airborne Express.
    2. Open box, read manual, discover that it uses DHCP even though it's a "static" IP (hasn't changed since I signed up in May 2001).
    3. Plug in "Telocity Gateway" which looks to me like a DSL modem with DHCP server functionality.
    4. Wait for lights to stop blinking and shine a steady green.
    5. When I finally realize the lights will never stop blinking, call support, find out that BellSouth reversed the polarity when hooking up the physical connection. Wait 5 days for BellSouth to fix this.
    6. When the connection's finally right and the lights stop blinking, refresh the DHCP lease on my Linux box.
    7. Open Mozilla, surf to 10.5.1.2 (!). Click "Next" a few times in the browser window while Telocity tells me they don't want me using their service for spamming or distributing warez. Wait for a page to come up that says "Now close your browser window and reboot your computer (or release and renew your DHCP lease, if using Unix/Linux)"
    8. Close Mozilla, renew my dhcp lease.
    9. Enjoy the blazing speeds, stable connection and great news server until DirecTV buys Telocity and the news server goes to shite, the connection drops at least twice a week, speeds go from an average of 1.2mbps to 750kbps, and the hold time for tech support goes from 5 minutes to 2 hours.
  266. SBC gearing up for a forced "upgrade" by Animats · · Score: 2
    From SBC:
    • A Note to Current SBC Pacific Bell DSL Internet Access Service Customers:

      Keep an eye on your inbox and mailbox this winter for information about your SBC Yahoo! DSL upgrade software.

      Upgrading is easy and improves your service without interfering with four important aspects of your membership. Your email address, your price, your billing method, and the speed of your DSL Internet connection all stay the same as they are now while you get all the great benefits of SBC Yahoo! DSL.

    So it looks like SBC is preparing to shove the Broadjump spyware/adware down the throats of their existing customers. SBC customers may want to look into switching to Covad
    1. Re:SBC gearing up for a forced "upgrade" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One catch: not all of us SBC (Southwestern Bell in my case) people happen to have Covad in our central offices. For me, it's their DSL or I have to start throwing money at a hicap circuit and a real ISP. There's no other way to host my own services from my home office.

      If they pull this stuff on every customer here, I'm going to get a bunch of people from my neighborhood together and start a co-op ISP. It's been mentioned enough here on Slashdot, and given a good pile of startup money, it could actually work. Just tell the neighborhood kids that their "ping times" (their term, not mine, I prefer "latency") to their friends in the neighborhood will kick ass since it's all local. They sell the parents on the idea, and the rest is simple.

    2. Re:SBC gearing up for a forced "upgrade" by Igor47 · · Score: 1

      I recently signed up for SBC DSL in Chicago (SBC Ameritech). (self-install) they sent me a CD full of crap, and stupidly, i decided to go through with running it. it actually had a flash installer! long story short, the broadjump client wouldn't even install, but there were no options to choose what to install and what not to install. when the installer crashed, and when i actually had to go into safe mode to bood my win2k, i called tech support to complain and a nice woman told me to get rid of the crap and keep only EnterNet (dynamic IP sux) So...if tech support told me this, i'm guessing its not crucial for me to have all their crap on my computer even through its installed automatically.

      --
      I am Igor!
  267. Re:Have a honeypot - an old MAC by twoslice · · Score: 2

    We'll that could very well be true since I am not a MAC fanatic.

    But Apparently it worked, because neither his friends, nor the cable guy knew anything about MAC's either - so the myth would have propagated.

    (shhh don't tell anyone...)

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  268. Glad I have a Mac by WiggyWack · · Score: 1

    This is another reason I love having a Mac. I've had DSL twice and currently have cable. I've never needed a special install CD. Usually the instructions for the PC installation including putting in the CD, but for the Mac, it just basically tells you to ignore the CD and turn on DHCP. Easy.

    I know, this probably has nothing to do with the Mac's coolness. It has more to do with the fact that Macs control a very small piece of the market so there's less software made for it. Sometimes that's bad (games) but sometimes it's good (viruses, spyware, other stupid crap installed by your ISP's install CD)

    --
    Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
    1. Re:Glad I have a Mac by phillymjs · · Score: 2

      I second that. I got cable from Comcast in '97. Back then, they sent out a hardware team to run the coax and set up the modem, and then a software guy showed up a little later to set up the computer.

      The software guy didn't even get one foot in the door. I told him, "Gimme the config sheet and be on your way." I changed my TCP/IP settings in the Control Panels and the server addresses in Claris Emailer, and I was in business. No spyware, no stupid Comcast-branded, older-than-current version of IE to contend with.

      I dropped Comcast about a year ago when I became dissatisfied with the increasing restrictions on their service. I replaced them with DSL from Speakeasy, and had just as painless a transition without installing a byte of their software, either (I'm not even sure a CD came in the box with the DSL modem).

      ~Philly

  269. Never have onsite problems by macdaddy · · Score: 5, Informative
    When I had cable installed, they had to come out and do the install. They didn't have the option. They did support Mac though. Yes, I'm a Mac, Linux, Sun guy. He walked in the to my second bedroom and his jaw dropped. He handed me the box of stuff and said that I probably wasn't going to need any assistance. He then went outside to do something to the cable box, came back in, I said I was on, and he left. Maybe it was the stack of Enterasys switches or the stack of Suns in the corner. Might even have been the Ciscos routers on the corner desk next to the laser printer. Of course I can't leave out the cluster of Mac towers running next to the door. Perhaps the general heat in the room made him weak in the knees. Needless to say I don't normally have trouble with the techs when they come onsite. :)

    Now techs on the phone is another problem. Back when I had cable, I quickly discovered that the national helpdesk for RR was staffed by a bunch of dicks. I called them to let them know about a case of router flap that had been going on for over a week. They started giving me the wrong around about my "Windows" box being misconfigured. I informed him that I own no Microsoft products. To that he replied that everyone runs Microsoft. I laughed and said that I was one person that didn't. He asked what I ran and I replied I used a Mac. He then said something to the effect, "don't you know? Microsoft owns Apple". He also said that he couldn't see why anyone would want to use such a worthless operating system. I was starting to get a little pissed at this point. I asked if he'd say the same about my Linux boxes or my Suns. He said Sun is dead. Microsoft was buying them out. He also said that Linux was a hacker's tool and that he could have me arrested for using it. .... Now being a Mac user, I know what it's like to have my OS insulted. You don't insult a Mac guru's OS. You don't insult a Linux guru's OS either. You damned sure don't insult both in the same paragraph. If he had been there in person I would have firmly planted a Sun keyboard in his ass sideways. Since he wasn't all I could do was cuss at him and demand to speak to his super. He refused and hung up on me.

    Well, I returned the favor. <g%gt; I always record my tech support calls. I dubbed a couple copies of the tape and certified USPSed them to Cox, RR, and my state AG. I also included a letter that indicated who all received a copy of the tape, summarized the coversation, gave a time and date for the call, back ground to counter the ill-informed knowledge, and finally notified them in writing of the router flap. About 4 days later, I noticed that the router flap had been fixed. A few days letter I received a letter from Cox apologizing for the problems and promising to investigate further. The next day I received a letter from RR apologizing for their employee's action and informing me that the tech was no longer with RR. Oh happy day. :-)

    I've found a couple tricks when calling a tech support line that might help you. Always start off the conversation in a calm voice. Don't act pissed. Stay calm and collected. Ideally you would do this even if you felt you needed to ask for the tech's super. State your name, where you're calling from, and on behalf of what company. This is a good thing to do even if it's for you home line. Pretend the loss of access if affecting you at work. "My name is John Wayne; I'm the Network God at Such n Such Unv in Smallville, St; I'm calling to inform of that you have a case of router flap that is causing us problems downstream.". Be concise and to the point. If you think you need to drop some techy stuff to make them feel you know what you're talking about, drop big things only. Don't jargon-drop little stuff. Spend more of your time keeping everything else you say technically accurate. Don't let yourself slip up. Stay calm. Always stay calm. Say "I'm calling to inform you of a DDoS attack coming from one of your customers" not "You're DDoSing us! We're gonna sue! Our routers are melting. We're melting. ARGH!". The latter makes a bad impression. Try to maintain control of the conversation. Don't let them BS you into doing weird shit. State the facts up front. Tell them exactly what you've done to diagnose the problem. This is how I get hard drives replaced without all the reformatting bullshit. When I know the HD is bad I call them and tell them I've low-leveled it, checked jumpers, tried it in another machine, and run two bad blocks checks on it; here at the results. I've covered all their bases with the facts. All they have to do next is RMA it. Good luck!

    1. Re:Never have onsite problems by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      You realize that recording telephone calls without the other party's consent is wiretapping? If you don't have the other party's consent, there must be an audible beep every 15 seconds in the conversation.

      That's okay, though...you probably made up the whole conversation.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Never have onsite problems by macdaddy · · Score: 2
      Actually I don't have to tell them I'm recording the conversation. I don't have to tell them squat. I can't use the tape in court because it would be inadmissable but I can use the tape any other way I wish. Just because it can't be used in court doesn't mean it's illegal. Now on the other hand RR couldn't use the tape in court if the guy wanted to sue them because again it's not admissable. However they could just as easily say that I've filed a formal complaint against the person. If they've documented problems with that person previously, they could then safely can him.

      And yes, the conversation did take place.

  270. Command Line by intermodal · · Score: 2

    Even better: Use a minimal base install of linux with no X.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  271. Broadjump by Ironpoint · · Score: 1


    Please delete this adware/spyware NOW.....

  272. They installed nothing but they still suck... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Only thing I have ever seen on the cluelesses machines with Roadrunner is their Road Runner Medic. They usually won't install it either unless they're asked. They push self installs for almost everything. Even cable convertor boxes.

    I have Road Runner and as soon as I can get DSL I am getting it. First off, I never cal tech support until I try everything I know. Then when I do call and first level says first delete your network connections and recreate them I say I already did that and if he says do it again I say let me talk to your manager. Now it seems they know me and they just send me to second level on the spot. Then whenever I detect a problem on their end (DHCP server not responding, random connection problems, thier cable modem "updates" not working(from the modems web page)), I have to practically jump up and down on one hand upside down to get their attention. One time I had a guy come and check my levels and he saw I had a splitter in the line between TV's and the cable modem. He insisted that you should not split a cable modem dedicated jack and I told him YOU GUYS DID IT! (it's true they did). I would love to rewire it myself with a DC6 and a dual jack with one for the TV's and one for the cable modem, but I can't find a DC6. Anyone know where I could find one? I would love to do it and see if he was right. My most favorite one though is when I broke down and called them to run a cable from my basement to where the cable modem is and they drilled a hole in my FLOOR! I ASKED and PAID for a WALL JACK. Funny thing is when they came to re-do it, they only had to drill the hole about 5 inches over from where they did drill it and it only took about a minute to fish the cable up thru the wall (internal wall, no insulation). They guy was in so much of a hurry, he could not do it right! All I say is fine. If you can't do it right, then you wil come back and do it right again. There's never time to do it right the first time but there's always time to do it after it was screwed up the first time.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:They installed nothing but they still suck... by kettch · · Score: 2

      I'm on dialup (i live too far away)*sobs* and i still have lots of trouble with my provider. One time they decided to rebuild their proxy server (i used the proxy because we use filtered services to keep my brother away from porn) and they didn't bother telling anybody they were going to do it. So one day my connection dies, and i tried everything i knew and nothing worked. When i turned off the proxy server it worked. I was too tired and lazy to call tech support so i went to bed.

      For about a week didn't even use my connection at home. I did stuff from school that i needed. About a week after the first time the connection died i tried to get online with the proxy off, no dice.

      So i called techsupport and let the tech babble. I eventually go him to tell me that they were rebuilding the proxy server. When he said that, i almost blew my top. I just said "ok" and hung up. I still had to use the proxyless connection for a few more days before they got it back up.

      I almost called tech support and asked them if they needed any help.

      Curse my rural location!!!!!!

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
  273. Forgot to add... by scoove · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're concerned about spyware, be very careful about who's DNS server you list in your PC.

    Should your service provider wish, he can capture Ethernet traffic specific to DNS inquiries and compile some interesting information without even needing you to install and use his client software.

    We used this approach at my previous job (dealing with employee security and network use compliance... great job, eh? *sigh*) We had web proxy operating but had an occasional employee who bypassed the proxy and figured he could avoid detection as he surfed his favorite porn or gambling site. By tracking his DNS lookups (many of the sites had hidden references to sextracker.com which made it easy to spot), we'd take his URL of choice and map the DNS to monster.com or hotjobs.com - giving him the clue that continued use might be an opportunity to work elsewhere.

    Sniffed properly, your provider will obtain an IP address and the Internet address being looked up (e.g. sextracker.com). He can insert the sniffer in line with the DNS server(s) to simplify data capture (rather than have to deal with inspection on a bigger network).

    Should he limit DNS lookups on the same segment as his nameserver, you may be able to avoid this spying by operating your own DNS (e.g. on your dual-NIC Linux firewall) or by using an alternate DNS server.

    *scoove*

    1. Re:Forgot to add... by uid8472 · · Score: 1

      Should your service provider wish, he can capture Ethernet traffic specific to DNS inquiries and compile some interesting information without even needing you to install and use his client software.

      This can even be done with nothing more than stock BIND; just ndc (or rndc) querylog, to enable [what I assume was meant as] a debugging feature wherein every DNS query is logged. For best results, set up syslog and/or BIND's logging system ahead of time to send it all to a separate file for easier grepping...

    2. Re:Forgot to add... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      If you're concerned about spyware, be very careful about who's DNS server you list in your PC.

      Mine all use 192.168.100.1...anything that's not locally cached gets looked up at the root servers, IIRC. Once it's cached, a website comes up much more rapidly than if it had to be looked up through the ISP's nameserver.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:Forgot to add... by afidel · · Score: 2

      Don't think that this will disuade them from watching your traffic. They can and will use things like transparant proxies to keep a log of the websites you visit if they so wish. This is why I use a local ISP who's policies are clearly stated and who provides an anonymous caching server with the caveat that if it is abused they will find who did it and that they will comply with a legal warant. I get a personally acceptable level of privacy and the knowledge that as long as I do not involve law enforcement I will never have any problems.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Forgot to add... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "If you're concerned about spyware, be very careful about who's DNS server you list in your PC...We used this approach at my previous job (dealing with employee security and network use compliance... great job, eh? *sigh*)"

      Just another reason to list slashdot in your hosts file, along with a 127.0.0.1 for all the adult sites which can easily be found in a nice pre-formatted hosts file right here.

  274. How to stop it..... by Dr.Random · · Score: 1
    Cable ccompanies require a franchise agreement with your city to establish their "Monopoly", so all you have to do is get some people together, submit a petition, and present it to the city. They can work your requirements into the franchise agreement, and if the cable company wants to continue to service your area (lets assume this is a big yes), they will have to comply.

    You get to pay the city for the right to get your cable (see the "Franchise Fees" section of your bill), so you can stop it.

  275. As a Former AOL-TW HSD Installer... by ONU+CS+Geek · · Score: 5, Informative
    I know what actually happens when the cable guy comes out to install; as I was the one who was doing it. Here's the run-down:

    1.) The Installer checks your cable lines to see what the forward and return levels are, to see if they'll work with your exisiting drop at your house-box. If everything's ok, they'll run an extra outlet, take it to the house box, and split it off as the first splitter in your box. If it's not ok, they'll re-hang or re-bury the drop, then run your AO.

    2.) The Cable installer calls in the MAC address of your cable modem, so that DOCSIS can authorise your account.

    3.) We plug in the cable modem in, and make sure that the Cable Modem actually lights up. Once that Cable Modem is lit, you can get a DHCP address with any DHCP client.

    4.) We'd run the RoadRunner disk...it'd set up the IEAK Customizations, set up email addresses, and then do a series of tests to ensuer that everything was ok. This included a ping test, a DNS test, and tweak your TCP/IP settings for broadband.

    Basically, once they bring it in, DOCSIS provides the authentication (if you're on a system that uses DOCSIS). They shouldn't need to run any software on your computer that provides authentication--it's hardware based.

    --

    I disable sigs...do you?
    1. Re:As a Former AOL-TW HSD Installer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whore

  276. Dreamcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many people are saying set up a dummy computer or something, but isn't it even easier to just let them hook it to your Sega Dreamcast? Many broadband providers that I've seen have offered support for them, and lets see them try and install software on it!

    Long Live Sega!

  277. acceptable use policy by boolean0 · · Score: 1

    here at school i work for the dorm networking service, when people have trouble getting connected (all the time) we have to go out and troubleshoot. they also have to register their MAC address (problems with ip hoppers and such) and read the AUP. whenever we go out when we get to that part, we have them read it and accept, we don't accept to anything for them.

    i would think they should at least give you a chance to read the AUP/EULA/TOS before they install anything. if you don't agree, then don't use it.

  278. The cable guy by dragontooth · · Score: 1
    No need to dump all the anti-corporate conspiracy theory bullshit on the poor joe who gets payed 10 bucks an hour to hookup peoples homes.

    Well I am not sure about where you live but where I live TFR's (technical fields reps) love getting the Internet installs. They make $30 per install. That can add up to a lot of money. When S**w Cable was doing a serious push to get their broadband into homes a friend of mine was doing 15 - 20 of these per day. Thats a lot of payola. I wouldn't feel too sorry for them. Why should we compromise our PC's just to make someone whose job it is to do this easier. We all know there are people who are less than savvy when it comes to how their PCs work but thats what they get paid for....just like I get paid to write software and explain it to the dumb marketing people. Same difference.

    --
    "Laugh, and the whole world laughs with you. Cry, and they still think its funny." - Mr. Boffo
  279. No software here... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    When the cable company sent the installer out, the most he might've done was tweak the network settings on my (at the time) Win98 box...and maybe not even that. Once he was gone, I put it back to its private IP address and configured my Linux router to start using the cable modem instead of demand-dialed PPP. (Even with DHCP, the cable-modem connection ended up being much easier to set up than a dial-up connection. Now the router's on a static IP address, which makes things easier still.)

    I can see spyware getting loaded up on your computer if you're stuck getting your broadband from these clowns, but overall I've had very little hassle dealing with Cox.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  280. How could he? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The installer didn't know how to load software on to either my firewall/router, or my Linux box, so he didn't give me any grief.

    He handed me the paper with the info, and I set things up in a few seconds. He was happy to be done so quicky.

    The cable modem provides DHCP to your PC or router
    (you do have a firewall/router right!). Then you just want to know the name of their mail server, and your account name/password.

  281. ISP probably IS your newspaper and TV station. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    I say inform your local newspaper or television news station.

    Your ISP and local TV station are very likely owned either by the same media conglomerate as your ISP, or another that is pulling the same stunt. If you live in anything larger than a village, the same is probably true of your local newspaper.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  282. My Cable Install Experience by Alan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I moved about a month ago, and moved from DSL to cable, and thought I'd share my experience with people.

    The guy came over, hooked up the cable modem, and watched as I ran about 50 feet of cable from it, around the back of the apartment, and through the window of the office (the only cable jack was on the opposite side of the house to the computers). When I finished he asked which computer had to be set up. "That one" I said, pointing to a small box hidden under the desk. It is a p133 that has run my website on 48 megs of ram for the last 5 years. "But not really that one," I finished.

    See I have a nifty little firewall from netmaster (was merilus) which is a full computer on a pci card that uses the host computer only for power via the PCI bus. When I explained this to him he just kinda nodded.

    "Don't worry," I told him, "I'll take care of it all." "All I need from you is the end of a cat5 cable." He went back to the cable modem and did the initialization or whatever he needed to do, and I overheard him say to head office something about "no, this guys going to set it all up."

    I had already set up the card for DHCP, so it was a matter of replacing the DSL modem cat5 cable and putting in the new one from the cable modem. I borrowed a pen from the slightly stunned installer and reset the system, waited the 40 or 50 seconds for the system to come back up, and then pinged out from my linux workstation.

    I mentioned that I worked for the last few years with a networking company and he said "well, you know a lot more than me then." No shit was the un-stated response. He left after having touched nothing more than the cabel modem.

    Moral of the story: If you don't want them to touch anything (and any moderately competant geek shouldn't), don't let them! All that needs to be done on a cable modem install is to plug in the external cable into your firewall (you DO have a firewall right?) and for you to either reboot it or renew the DHCP lease. You can set up all the @HOME proxy info if you want, but it's not needed.

  283. replying... by Sharth · · Score: 1

    Guy who came to my house to set up comcast cable was neat. He basically set it up for the one computer witout touching any cd-roms. He took out the package for the stuff and just gave it to me and said that it was basically worthless and will probably break the computer. got it working in 1 minute in linux too. added the nic to the kernel. ran pump -i eth0. worked perfectly. :)

  284. How to explain this is a Bad Thing to non-geek by gsfprez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Honda just started a thing where they put a GPS reciever/transmitter in your car. They track everywhere you go and how long you're there (when you're stopped).

    Say you stop at AM/PM, they know that you are a user of Arco gasoline. Say you stop at a Michales craft store, they know that you are into crafts. Perhapse you stop at Costco - they could surmise that you have a large family.

    This, along with the ability to record your conversations in the car are used to find out what your into, but its anonymous, of course. All that they use that information for is to customize advertisements on your car stereo just for you.

    They also track who is in the car with you, because they is useful demographic information to help them with their targeted advertizing.

    You don't have anything to hide, so that wouldn't bother you, would it?

    So - are you wondering when you can get one of these new Hondas?

    No?

    Aunt Mary, just replace Honda with Microsoft and/or your Internet service provider.

    You DO know that you've ALREADY agreed to this on your computer, right?"

    This has worked for me 100% of the time. They get creeped out every time.

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  285. Right - INCLUDES a MODEM. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    Hm, the physical layer of the DSL line can just be described as a MODEM kind of thing. But there are other layers in the DSL box.

    Right. It includes a MODEM, and other stuff. The Alcatel ANTs, for instance, support packet-over-ATM with up to 8 virtual circuits, so there's an ATM layer. Then there's an Ethernet layer. And it has a whole internet stack and an HTML server to provide a virtual console for configuration.

    That's a bit more than your typical MODEM, even in these days of peripherals smarter than the mainframes of a decade ago.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  286. It phones home (no surprise) by bluephile · · Score: 1

    From: http://osiris.978.org/~brianr/mirrors/www.iscentra l.org/%257Etcniso/main/cisp.htm (The "warning:" is in big red text) ---- Warning: It is recommened that Comcast/Cox subscripbers should -uninstall- the "BroadJump Client Foundation" from their computers and remove the "Comcast Support" or "Support.com" material from their computer's before trying to modify their cable modems for better speeds. The broadjump software will soon be capable of doing CRC checks on the bootfile in a soon, undisclosed upgrade. The upgrade -is- going to happen in the next few months. (or sooner) Essentially, the "broadjump" software will do the CRC check, the "Comcast Support" or "Support.com" software (which is already acting like a server on the client computer) is calling home, constantly. ---- That last phrase is especially scary!

  287. I guess I am lucky with Cox.net here in RI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy simply hooked my wires to the pole and ran them nice and neat to my Computer room where I installed the modem and hooked it up myself. In fact he cautioned me to NOT install anything off the drivers CD as it would likely cause problems. This was not always the case when COX.NET was COX@HOME.

    My first run in with COX@home he would not even install on my machine because I had a system with some disabled Hardware in it, thus the Device mangler in windoze showed some yellow ?'s. The system ran fine but the dopes checklist had a stopsign if anything like that was present. Another appointment and 6 weeks later I had a bare bones machine with nothing on it on a clear deask just sitting there waiting for him. The same installer showed up and checked all the same stuff and installed all manner of crap on the system. When he left I plugged the modem into my system upstairs and reformatted the other one back to some linux distro of the time. Incidently the second install, had the guys manager in tow as he watched everything the guy did like a hawk. The manager even chuckled a bit when the systems name and harddisk names showed up in the various lists as "COX_BULLSH#%"

    heh 8-)

  288. Earthlink - Mac OS X by mcscary13 · · Score: 1

    I got Eathlink service over Time Warner cable lines, so a Time Warner tech showed up to install. I could tell he hadn't the foggiest when he sat down at my G4 and began slowly running the mouse over the dock to see the names of my programs. He paused just for a moment over the Virtual PC icon, so I felt a pang of pitty for the guy and showed him how to open the System Prefs. In three clicks I had it all set up. He left a disk with the Earthlink software, which is quite good, but rather useless for me. At least I had the option to install or not. I wonder if he would have tried to install it in Virtual PC? He would have been in for a surprise since I only have it to run some old DOS games!

  289. It was like... by The+Bungi · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    The guy came in, connected the modem, called in the serial number and waited for it to "find" itself in the network and make sure the diagnostics were OK.

    Then he suggested installation of his crapware, so I politely declined and asked if they used DHCP. "Yes" he said. Thankyouverymuch, have a nice day. He did give me a spare CAT5 cable, which was kinda nice of him.

    After he left I plugged in my router, configured it and obtained the IP address and DNS servers, and then connected the other boxes to the router. Voila.

    I don't believe the company can *force* you to install anything. I think they mostly have their own software so they can help non-technical users solve problems and lower their support costs (I remember browsing the old @Home CD and seeing a crapload of diagnostic utilities). But if you're clueless about how to set up your OS of choice to work with the thing then you can hardly complain, eh?

  290. No trouble with RoadRunner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in Northeast Ohio at least.

    The cable installer came over, got the line run into my apartment and made sure that cable TV was working. Then he looked at the mess of computers, parts, and cables everywhere and said "I'll let you set up the cable modem." He handed me the modem, software, and info sheet and left.

    I still don't know what's in that software box (other than a CD). :-)

    The only time I've ever had trouble with the service was when the modem broke. Even then they were pretty good about getting someone out to fix things ASAP.

    Getting 3 Mb down/512 kb up doens't hurt either. ;-)

  291. Missing the point? by scoove · · Score: 5, Informative

    The point is that most internet users don't even know what an IP is

    This is true, and I'll play devil's advocate a bit (since I don't see many arguing the service provider's view - even though I personally and professionally object to this level of intrusion, and also perceive an EULA to be rather unenforcable).

    They don't care about linux, and they probably aren't even aware that there could be software doing "bad things" on their PC

    Exactly. In fact, it gets much worse. They will demand you do things to them that are fundamentally bad... such as a medium-sized business we recently switched over that had been running a T1 with public addresses on every desktop, confidential filesharing servers (with public IPs) with IRC, RPC, NNTP, and thirty other services running, and absolutely *zero* firewalling/security/etc.

    They got replaced with a rackmount Mikrotik router system and were immediately firewalled, RFC 1918 standard private IP network, etc.

    Their response? Forget about thank you - nothing about complaints that they can't see things from home anymore (no, they won't buy VPN software - think cheap), can't run personal websites on desktops, open relaying on their Exchange server was "broken", etc. Oh, and to explain this to them? "We don't want to know about those details. We just want it to work the way it did before without spending more money."

    Users will insist on being stupid about IP, security, etc. (I only mention this because it is part of the mindset you need to understand to see where the service provider is going to come from).

    The tech did the EULA for them without consulting them

    Come on... do you expect these folks to be experts about business policy? We train our guys to provide option A or B - A = installed our way, B = no install, goodbye and good luck. 90% of the customers are never an issue, but the 10% "I design websites, so therefore I'm a networking expert" types micromanage everything and work hard to screw it all up.

    The contract demands the software to be installed. This is a serious problem.

    Yes, and back to my clueless business example, here's why they insist upon it:

    "Every time you users download something, reconfigure something, whatever, you dick up your IP settings and make me spend $50 per customer service telephone call to fix it."

    By loading this software, I ensure that my configuration will probably stay on top of all the nonsense you put in there, and I can actually have a clue what is going on when you manage to screw it up still.

    The alternative is $500/month broadband (minimum...), or zero support (which doesn't work, btw - people would still blame the service provider when a tornado obliterates their home, destroys their PC, and "their Internet doesn't work.")

    Let's actually discuss ways to resolve it for everyone, rather than trying to make ourselves look clever.

    It really comes down to one of two options:

    1. Do it yourself. Know how to do all of this stuff as good or better than the service provider (and fake like you're an idiot customer with the spare Wintel box next to your connection for when you have to demonstrate the service provider has a problem).

    2. Let your service provider do it all for you. Don't care to learn IP? Don't want to accept responsibility for screwing up your IP service when you load that stupid "dialup optimization" software you saw in a pop-up box, on top of a broadband PPPoE connection? (usually also spyware... ugh) Be my guest... but understand that decision comes with a price. And understand that price usually includes your service provider getting to capture all that data on you, in exchange for protecting you from your own stupidity.

    The only other solution I can see is a Spyware-Free certification standard for service providers and software vendors. Establish a neutral entity, develop criteria for membership and verification, and allow people to promote that their product/service is compliant and recognized by the organization. Sort of a BBB approach to the issue...

    *scoove*

    1. Re:Missing the point? by rilian4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "1. Do it yourself. Know how to do all of this stuff as good or better than the service provider (and fake like you're an idiot customer with the spare Wintel box next to your connection for when you have to demonstrate the service provider has a problem)." I like this option. I uninstalled the software that was installed on my PC by the installer guy. Oh yeah, the guy installing my software refused to setup(nor new how to setup) email on anything other than Outlook Express(Which I refuse to use!). I let him do it and then copied the settings to my own email software after he left.

      --

      ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
    2. Re:Missing the point? by aborchers · · Score: 5, Informative

      Extremely insightful post. Thanks for providing a counterbalance to the self-congratulating, elitist zealotry that is rife on this board. As a software engineer and consultant, I am more than familiar with the classic "luser" phenomenon, and sadly we have to assume that 99% of our users are clueless at best, and likely flat out dangerous. On the other hand, as a consumer of technical services (e.g. my DSL line at home) I find that dealing with tech support is uniformly frustrating for the advanced user because the providers are so focused on the clueless.

      It would not cost them a $50 support call to answer direct technical questions from experienced users if they would route questions properly based on their content. For example, if a user calls up, explains that he has changed network cards and asks to have the MAC entry changed in their database, it is not effective customer service to work through a thirty minute script only to end with an escalation to second line support when a direct bump to second line could have finished the call in one minute! (Example from my experience, obviously)

      Basically, phone centers need to program their script bots with something akin to keyword matching to determine when the caller is not going to be served by a cookbook of click heres and tab theres. In my experience, it is luck of the draw whether you get a first line rep who knows their stuff or is just following the script, and there are a lot of gradations between first and second line that could be subdivided more efficiently. Can it really be that cost ineffective to provide decent, non-irritating support to all levels of users, as opposed to just the clueless ones?

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:Missing the point? by Vesuvius_2 · · Score: 1

      What you describe is acceptable, but it isn't what the article refers to. the article states that the software "Builds a database of subscriber demographics and buying behaviors to help evolve and refine marketing efforts" this is spyware for the sole purpose of marketing, it does nothing to aid in tech support.

    4. Re:Missing the point? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But that's not the problem! I have no issue with them installing support clients, configuration managers, service helpers, whatever. I apreciate that these things keep costs down, and I get to take advantage of some of those savings with smaller bills.

      The problem is the "other" stuff that is bundled along with it. When spyware started to become bundled along with free downloads, roughly the same time that download.com got crap, it was accepted that they needed to generate revenue somehow. Basically the same reasons we tolerate ads on the net, TV and radio.

      However, spyware has become endemic. Everything seems to have it. What I object to is the inclusion of spyware not for monetry reasons, like we are discussing here. What's more, putting aside the morality of hiding the spyware in the EULA (which is basically lying, your are trying to deceive someone), here we are talking about forced installations.

      Sure, you don't have to accept the deal, but you've waited weeks for the taxi to come and take you away from 56k land, and the last thing you are going to do is say, "sorry, I'll get the next one". That's even if you are one of the enlightened few who realise what's going on.

      If I download a free tool to do a specific task, I might get spywared. That's a part of the game. However, when an ISP starts using it, then it becomes worrying.

      I'm sure many companies don't understand the meaning of what they are doing. They see it as an opertunity to understand their customers better. They just can't seem to see through the end-users eyes and realise that what they are doing is wrong.

    5. Re:Missing the point? by Feanturi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Every time you users download something, reconfigure something, whatever, you dick up your IP settings and make me spend $50 per customer service telephone call to fix it."

      By loading this software, I ensure that my configuration will probably stay on top of all the nonsense you put in there, and I can actually have a clue what is going on when you manage to screw it up still.

      The alternative is $500/month broadband (minimum...), or zero support


      Umm, how does installing commonly-used software 'dick up IP settings'? Other than proxy settings, what are you protecting? Using software to insure that your settings stay on top is counter-competitive, as when/if the customer decides to switch to another provider, they may have a tough time of it. Think AOL, and how it keeps email and favorites separate from the system, so that when a user switches they have to figure out how to get their favorites that they made during AOL use to transfer across since those only show up if they've loaded the AOL software first. There's also a local phone company here that has a software disk which I loathe. Their software (which constantly resets "Always dial") will not uninstall unless the disk can be found and put in the drive, so it is not always possible to remove it since the disk has long since been lost. You can get around it if you know what to do, but that's the annoying part, you have to know what to do, and not simply do what should be obvious.

      I install cable internet in people's homes, and there are only certain bits of software that we might install depending on the situation: If their IE is only version 4, I upgrade them to 5.5 SP2 (I don't believe they benefit from having 6), and throw on the latest cumulative patch behind it. I am to ensure that they have a workable version of Realplayer and Quicktime. I say 'ugh' to Realplayer but it's not my fault that so many misguided web operators choose to put their content in that format. When I install RP I make sure to disable their stupid tray icon. If I notice that gohip, CommonName, Netsetter, or other beasties are present, I remove them, and explain to the customer why this is happening. I do some other extras that are not required of me, like checking out their system for scary open ports (like 27374, etc), showing them windowsupdate.com, helping them install Zone Alarm if they are concerned about having a firewall, etc..

      If I was required to install spyware/you're-staying-with-us-no-matter-whatware, I would disobey, or quit, or something. But that software would not get installed on any of my runs. We don't have such software, and do not seem to be in danger of having to charge $500/month. Plus our phone support is 24/7, hold times generally around 2 minutes. And each customer installed does not make the company any money till after about a month and a half of service because I get paid first.

    6. Re:Missing the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently had cable modem service installed, as it had just become available in my neighborhood. They were targeting the 99%, so "self install" wasn't (officially) an option.
      Before install time, I booted my machine to Win98 (as opposed to FreeBSD that it runs 99.9% of the time) so the installer wouldn't freak out. Plus, once he leaves, I won't be running the any software he installs, so I just let him do whatever it is he has to do.
      So the cable guy shows up and I help him run the cables (was getting new cable TV service, too).
      Not knowing exactly how things were supposed to work, I was trying to chit-chat with the guy while we were running cables (so, you guys use DHCP or static addresses?). Never got anywhere with that.
      Once the computer install started, it became apparent that he didn't know what DHCP was. He just knew he went through some steps on a checklist, and things were supposed to work. After he floundered, unable to get to a one-time-only service registration page, I asked him if he had any self-install paperwork (in the hopes that I could figure out what he was supposed to be doing - he clearly didn't know). While he was outside rummaging through his truck, I clicked on "Obtain an IP address automatically", rebooted, and viola!
      When he got back, he saw the screens he was familiar with, and continued to blunder his way through the install.
      Would have been a lot faster (and cheaper for them) if they'd just told me what needed to be done, rather than sending the cable guy with a list of instructions he didn't understand.
      So after he left, I hooked up my NAT/firewall appliance, hooked up my wife's computer, and booted mine back to FreeBSD.
      Life is good again, although my young daughter misses the melodic sounds of the modem dialing out.

    7. Re:Missing the point? by sbwoodside · · Score: 2, Informative

      "On the other hand, as a consumer of technical services (e.g. my DSL line at home) I find that dealing with tech support is uniformly frustrating for the advanced user because the providers are so focused on the clueless."

      Oh man does that ever remind of what happened about a month ago. Here I am calling Bell Sympatico (the big DSL in canada) because I can't send emails with attachments, in fact most emails wont go out, they sit around for a few hours and then finally get accepted by the SMTP server. And so I talk to this guy for like half an hour, going back and forth trying stuff, "proving" that it doesn't work by saying "OK I'll try to send it again ... nope, it didn't go" and then finally he finds out I'm using a Yahoo account. So he says, no, we don't support Yahoo accounts on our SMTP server, it's their fault, you have to call them.

      OK fine I'm sick of talking to him anyway. So I hang up. Obviously he's wrong, their SMTP server is the ONE server in the world that SHOULD be taking all my email. But no.

      So I flip around idly for a while and find that Yahoo's help has a page that specifically contradicts this guy. Oh, goody, an authoritative answer! So I call back, and get some different guy (and this time I get his name). Me and him talk argue for a while about whether or not they're supposed to support Yahoo and finally I ask for the supervisor.

      First I tell him that his support person lied to me about Yahoo, he agrees, whoops, Sorry. He says he'll talk to them about that. OK, so what do they support? Outlook. OK, how about Entourage (the OS X version of outlook) -- he's never heard of that, no go. Alright, I say, you wait on the line and I'll download Outlook for Classic. Finally I get that loaded, and ... it works!

      Damn.

      Oh yeah ... in all this, I claim my computer's directly attached to the internet because they don't support home networks.

      OK, so after an hour on the phone with sympatico chasing ghosts, I go on the Apple support boards. There's a tip there that says that I need to change the MTU (whatever that is) on my linksys router because of an incompatibility with rendezvous zeroconfig. OK, so I change the MTU to 1049 or seomthing like that and *poof* everything starts to work.

      Moral of the story? Go online to the support boards and don't bother with the tech support droids.

    8. Re:Missing the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you fall into the 18%.

      The 2% would have found out about MTU settings long before calling support.

    9. Re:Missing the point? by budgenator · · Score: 3, Funny

      something akin to keyword matching
      ME: Do you you block out-bound SMTP traffic
      AOL: Sir AOL doesn't block Email
      ME: Well I can send mail out through my personal ISP through the website, but can not when connected to the internet through AOL.
      AOL: Are you sure the website is configured properly, we aren't responsable for websites
      ME:yes the website is configured properly, I can send Email from my Linux computer to the site through My personal ISP, and I can send Email from this Windows machine to the site through My personal ISP, but I can not I can send Email from this Windows machine to the site through AOL.
      AOL: AOL doesn't suppport Linux
      ME: My boss just doesn't belive me when I told him that AOL probably blocks outbound email to external servers as a SPAM prevention measure. Do you or do you not block SMTP on port 25 from going to non-AOL mail servers?
      AOL: Yes sir, that is one of our Email abuse prevention measures.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    10. Re:Missing the point? by kettch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to work for a large hospital system in the IT department. We bought a *lot* of pc's from dell because we needed simple no nonsense boxes and dells gx*** series business machines were decent.

      We had a special contract with dell that gave us the phone number that would take us directly to the top level of support. Basically we would call and say "I have a gx110 with a bad motherboard." then we give the tech the numbers off the back of the machine. Usually within 24 hrs (or as few as 16), i had a new part.

      I think it would be neat if the local offices for these broadband companies would do a 1 minute interview with the caller the first time they accessed tech support. If the caller matches certain criteria, and can prove himself to not be an idiot. Then he should be granted the ability to get past the front line techs.

      Not that this would ever happen, and its all full of possible problems, but a guy can dream right?

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
    11. Re:Missing the point? by sbwoodside · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I'm not a sysadmin though I played one on TV once.

      And I think there's another 0.5% who would have already read the spec for rendezvouz, thought about it for a few minutes and said, "doh, it's gotta be the MTU".

    12. Re:Missing the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The monopoly cable company here layed off all thier computer savvy installers and support staff and gave thier wire-pullers a flashcard on how to install the internet service.

      It seems yours did as well. And they wonder why thier stock is falling and unsubscribers outnumber new subscriptions.

    13. Re:Missing the point? by Virgil · · Score: 1

      You are most certainly in the 18 percent. You lied to tech support about your configuration, and yet you expect them to pinpoint your problem? How the hell are they supposed to know about problems with your router if you don't tell them that you are using one?

      Moral of the story? Retards shouldn't be allowed to call tech support.

  292. just reformat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I accessed the control panel, wrote down all the key networking settings, and then did a full HD wipe, reformat, and reinstall. That way you are guaranteed to be free of the spyware that such programs leave behind after uninstall.

  293. trick the installer.... by mdelcorso · · Score: 1

    When I had my broadband installation done I had the installer put the cable modem on one of my junk machines. He was happy, and I could reimage the machine that he filled with crap after I moved the modem to where it should be :)

  294. Cable contractors by Fjandr · · Score: 1

    Unless they're driving a truck that's professionally painted with the logo of the cable company, they're probably contractors who get paid by the piece. A certain amount for installing an outlet, for hooking up the modem, for running an outside line, etc. Some contractors even get paid by the hour, but those are usually only the giant national outlets. The guys driving the company trucks usually don't care how long they stay there. (as far as contractors go, depending on what the employer's contract with the cable co. states, they often times get paid for every time they go back. Sometimes the customer is charged, sometimes they aren't.)

  295. They installed nothing on my linux machine by croftj · · Score: 1

    Charter Cable gave me a ethernet board and cable modem and had me sign a sheet saying they installed nothing on my machine. That was all it took!

    --
    -- Many men would appreciate a woman's mind more if they could fondle it
  296. Uninstall by ucblockhead · · Score: 2

    Just be aware that all the "Add/Remove Software" thing does is call uninstall program the program registered. There is no guarantee that a particular program a) registers an uninstall program when it installs and b) actually removes all components when it uninstalls.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  297. Cable providers forced software. by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting


    TimeWarner/RoadRunner in Tampa Florida has software, but they're usually too lazy to install it, which is a good thing. They used to have the required authentication software, but that's a different animal.

    TimeWarner/AOLCable in the Tampa area is actually RoadRunner. You can switch providers, save $5/month, and use the AOL auth software. Unfortunately it's an obnoxious set of popups and banners that drives me absolutely nuts. From what I understand that's all they do.

    Charter Communications in the Los Angeles area *DOES* have a spyware package, which sounds like what you have.. My girlfriend was putting in the order for my cablemodem, and they asked her "What OS are you using." The phone was handed off to men, and I told them Linux. They aren't allowed to even install with a Linux machine.. I had used on e on their network 2 weeks prior, so I knew it wasn't a technical problem. I finally gave in, and told them Win98, and brought a workstation back to the house for them to see when they installed..

    The Charter installer went to put the CD in to start installing software, and I told him "NO!" Then I asked what it was. :) He only answered "SpyWare". He put the disk in the box, which I still have, and they had a long waiver form that I had to sign. Basically it was that I understood that I wasn't taking full advantage of my PC, and I fully acknoledge that I should install the software at a future date, so I can make the most of my experience..

    Funny thing, I guess I made it clear enough that I only want a connection. They never even gave me my Email account info. Not like it matters, I never checked my TimeWarner/RoadRunner Email in the years that I had it.

    Their spyware wouldn't have done much good. They would have put it on a freshly installed 98 box, which would have gotten formatted later. I took that machine down, and put up my Linux firewall, and reassembled my home network (3 machines, for 3 people. Imagine that. hehe)

    It is obnoxious that they feel it's ok to push their software on you, but it's just as obnoxious as buying a new laptop with their choice of OS and software packages, that you're good enough to pay for. Did I really want WinXP Home and MSOffice 6000? Nope. But I don't have a choice.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:Cable providers forced software. by libertynews · · Score: 2

      I've got Charter here in Washington State, and when I told them Linux they didn't even blink. They wired the house, left the modem for me. I plugged it in, quickly learned how to use dhcpcd, called their tech support to activate it and presto, it was working.

      Well, there was 1 small hitch, he had to configure it using a mode that doesn't grab the MAC of the ethernet card in the PC. The tech knew what he was doing and I haven't had any problems in the month or so i've been using it.

      --
      Remember Lexington Green!
    2. Re:Cable providers forced software. by SagSaw · · Score: 2

      We signed up for charter cable internet service about six months ago (S.W. Michigan area), the enterire process went like this:

      1. Drive down to local service center to get modem and sign up for service.
      2. Drive down to Best Buy and pick up router/firewall.
      3. Drive home, connect cables, and surf away.

      Notice, there was no software that needed to be installed, no activiation, etc. Now if you want to hear about my experiance with Ameritech DSL... (grr)

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    3. Re:Cable providers forced software. by adolf · · Score: 2

      I've had nothing but joy with Ameritech DSL. The installers I've dealt with have all been either clued or nonexistant. Even the troublesome ADSL drop I used at the studio had its problems met by semi-clued support people with actual thinking skills.

      As for installations:

      At my sister's connection, Ameritech just sent her a dumb DSL modem via UPS. I used an extra Pentium machine they had as a PPPOE-talking Linux-based router, and things were golden from then on, without the slightest hint of instability on any level.

      That used to be my idea of a perfect install - give me the hardware, and leave me the fuck alone. But the next experience changed that attitude:

      At my mom's office, the installer showed up and saw that a small network was already in-place, but that all ports on the existing hub were in use. When he called me at home, I immediately felt all the usual anxiety about clueless nits destroying my work. He carefully asked if it would be OK to plug one machine into the 4-port hub of the Speedstream router they provided, in order to free up a port. I directed him to move a specific, seldom-used PC over to one of the router's ports. He traced the cable quickly and without complaint.

      After that, he correctly noted that the network was set up using static 10.x.x.x addressing, and explained that he was going to configure the Speedstream box to accomidate this instead of its default 192.168.x.x DHCP. I asked him to leave a note on the router indicating its new IP, and had him change the password to something other than "admin".

      He asked if it would be OK for him to change the default gateway and DNS settings for each machine on the network. I told him to go ahead.

      We thanked eachother for the help, and I hung up knowing that things were installed exactly how I would've done it myself.

      This, to me, is an ideal example of how all installations should happen. Whether it's a home security system done by a team of clean-cut pros, or a car stereo by a teenager at the local Best Buy.

      I wish it were a more common tale, however...

  298. power of attorney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Such a contract would basically specify that you grant power of attorney to whatever arbitrary cable installer the cable company sends out that day.

    Somehow, I don't see a company empowering legions of employees, hired on the basis of a week-long training course and a clean driving record, with power of attorney over most of their customers. Not, at least, unless that company was run by complete idiots.

    I have got an account somewhere around here, just don't recall the password... Not cowardly, just lazy you know.

  299. In Canada, you can challenge this... by RhetoricalQuestion · · Score: 2

    ... under PIPEDA. (http://www.privcom.gc.ca/).

    By law, federal companies have to make you aware and get your consent in order to obtain any personal information from you that is not required for the business transaction. (Provincial companies will have to start doing this as of 2004.) They must also tell you what they are using the information for, tell you exactly what information they have on you, and allow you to revoke consent at any time. There is still some fuzziness around whether this must be opt-in or opt-out, but they do need to make their privacy policies clear up front, as well as give you contact information for their privacy officer so that you can report abuse. (And they must look into all reports in a timely manner.)

    You probably will not get money for this, but you could effect change in their practices to make them comply. (The privacy commissioner invokes legal action as a last resort.)

    Of course, that's just in Canada.

    --

    I can spell. I just can't type.

  300. My cable company by anonymous+coword · · Score: 1

    All my cable company (Telewest) did to my internet connection (after drilling, setting up the cables etc) did was plug the cable modem in to the ethernet port, ran ipconfig in a c:\ prompt and ran ping a few times to check it was working, nothing else. I even seen him do it.

  301. Solution by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    It's simple really - dig out an old machine, install Win98 on it and let them do their stuff to your decoy. Once they have gone, connect your real machine (either putting the network card in your real system or setting up the allowed MAC address thingy on the cable companies web page) and format the decoy. Everybody's happy. If you want a good laugh however watch them try their procedures on a linux box.

  302. cable on my box by TheABomb · · Score: 1

    Last summer, while I was home from school, I was on a Charter cable modem (because of the damned winmodem my box came with). It took two guys to install when all they had to do was plug it in (and issue an `ifconfig eth0 up` as root). The whole time they were bitching about how hard Linux is, and all it took was one line at the shell prompt of 16 characters. Thank whatever god(s) you pray to (if any) that MicroSuck makes things so easy for us that all it takes to get a Windows box running on cable is a ninety-minute spyware install with two "trained" technicians--I wish I had it that easy. </sarcasm>

    --
    MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
  303. Whose Eula is it anyway? by martintt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depending on quite what you signed I'd say the Eula wasn't signed for you and didn't apply to you.

    Possibly the cable installer has actually broken the Eula by transfering the software to someone else.

    Eitherway you haven't agreed to not reverse-engineering the spyware. It would be nice then to keep sending them back reports on your computers activity that are completely bogus if enough people did this then all their data would be pretty worthless.

    I'm sure most people dmake up names etc when they are asked to give out personal information (income gender age job etc) to get a service.

    The general tactic is its even better to give wrong data than it is to refuse to give any at all. As this way you are invalidating anything other people are conned into giving.

    1. Re:Whose Eula is it anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say the Eula wasn't signed for you and didn't apply to you.
      the cable installer was working as an agent upon your behalf per legal definition. you authorized him to conduct the installation on your behalf, and the same authority that allowed him to touch your property was the same action that by proxy entered you into the eula. talk to an atty if you're not sure why this works this way.

      Possibly the cable installer has actually broken the Eula by transfering the software to someone else.
      novel argument but incorrect. see above, plus in other legal senses, he is acting as an agent of the cable company - there is no software transfer involving him as a receiving party.

      The general tactic is its even better to give wrong data than it is to refuse to give any at all.
      this would probably be fraud and could cause all sorts of bad things to happen to you if someone cared. usually the bad things only happen if someone cares enough about it, but i don't think i'd want to give someone a free pass to use when they wanted.

  304. Extremely Important Please Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use DSL for internet access (or satelite if DSL is not an option), and use satelite for your TV.

    The cable companies need to die, and die fast! They act as if they are still a monopoly.

  305. He Installed Nothing by Omicron · · Score: 1

    I didn't let him touch a thing. I unhooked my 2 pc's and put them into my closet. When he arrived, I had him hook up the cable modem and watched it get the signal and get online and all that good stuff.

    When he looked at me and asked about setting up the computers, I told him I was still in the process of moving and I hadn't moved the actual boxes yet...deal with it. He got a little indignant...but oh well.

    The last time a cable installer showed up (at my last apartment), he rebooted my win2k box (which was locked) by shutting off my surge protector, and then called me for the admin password. Riiiiigght...thank butthole, you've officially corrupted my disk now.

    Ah well...that was the last time I'll let those asshat installers anywhere near one of my computers.

  306. Charter Cable Contract guys were pretty cool... by dochood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When the Charter Cable guys came over to install the new cable modem (they gave me a self-install kit when I changed from PCI-Card Cable Modem [win98 only] to external), the pulled out a laptop with Windows 2000 Pro on it to log in and run a quick test. When they were done, they asked me to boot up my Windows machine and I just smiled, shook my head and said, "Nope. Debian." They responded, "Cool! Do you know what you're doing?" When I responded in the affirmative, they moved out of the way, and ooohed and aaaahed over my shoulder when I had it set up in 2 minutes flat and explained to them all of the cool stuff (MIME defanging, spam-filtering, etc) that I was doing on it.

    They told me I could run any service I wanted on my box (upstream is throttled to 128k anyway), as long as I wasn't competing with Charter and running an ISP out of my basement!

    My buddy, who lives 20 miles away, on the other hand has to suffer with AT&T. They installed 50 MB of who-knows-what on his system, and made him sign an agreement that basically said he's not allowed to run anything "cool" on his system: he can browse, ftp, and e-mail, and that's about it!

    Earthlink, who handles support for my Charter account, even has some limited Linux support, though I've yet to find them terribly helpful, or even very necessary.

    Other people I know who have ISPs that do portscans looking for services merely block the portscanner with their firewall, and they run what they want.

    dochood

  307. One party state? by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    He doesn't say, but it might be the case that he is in a "one-party state" - ie, a state which has laws that only one party to the conversation needs to be aware that the communications are being recorded, and in most cases, that only means the party doing the recording...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:One party state? by graikor · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that most tech support services tell you while you're on hold that this call may (or will) be recorded - so the tech should have already known that he's being recorded.

      He just wasn't aware how many people had copies...

      -----
      Obligatory IANAL: I have no idea what the legality of recording a conversation would be where both parties were aware they were being recorded, but one thought he was the only one doing the recording.

  308. Re:IF they're like mine. . by Bastian · · Score: 2

    They'll tell you in the pamphlets their service works with Linux. When you call tech support, you find out none of the tech support staff has even heard of Linux and refuse to even talk to you.

  309. Time-Warner is much nicer about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They charge by the IP address. Which strikes me as reasonable.

    I use a linksys firewall, which is allowed but is not a supported option. When I make tech support calls I just pull out my wife's iBook and say, "OK, I am on a Mac, what next?"

  310. Show him your non M$ OS by markalanj · · Score: 1

    Do what I did sit them down in front of your non MICRO$OFT OS. Its funny watching the dude try to install there MS software on a FreeBSD box. Guy gave up and I only paid half the install fee!

  311. How do I get a static IP? by seniorcoder · · Score: 1

    I have a DHCP allocated address. I would like a static address. I don't want to ask Comcast because they will suspect (correctly) that I want to run my own HTTP, email, etc, servers. Is there some way to do this without their help?

    1. Re:How do I get a static IP? by fetta · · Score: 1

      I have a DHCP allocated address. I would like a static address. I don't want to ask Comcast because they will suspect (correctly) that I want to run my own HTTP, email, etc, servers.

      If you leave your system on 24/7 and configure it to re-register it's DHCP info on a regular basis, you will usually keep the same IP address indefinitely. If you're using a broadband router like the SMC barricade, you may even have an option labelled something like "Renew IP Forever."

      Of course, none of this will prevent Comcast from using other means to detect that you're violating your terms of service.

      --
      ** The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of my employers - past, present, or future**
    2. Re:How do I get a static IP? by Broccolist · · Score: 1
      You can renew your IP address on a regular basis, which is likely to let you keep it for weeks/months, but it is bound to change eventually when they reboot their server or something. The bottom line is that it's under their control and there's no surefire way for you to keep the same address indefinitely.

      Probably the best course of action for you would be to get a free DNS subdomain (i.e. "dyndns.org", "dhs.org" etc.) instead, and to update that regularly. Even if your IP address changes, you will still be able to use the name, and it's easier to remember and communicate besides.

  312. nothing by painehope · · Score: 1

    i had a really good experience...Time Warner Cable supposedly only supports windows, but my cable guy didn't give a shit when I broke out a linux laptop, made sure I could get an IP, even gave me an extra segment of co-ax when I asked for it. the only shit i have is occasionally they will start blocking my traffic when i run gtk-gnutella, so i just restart my network services and i'm fine. haven't quite sorted out what they're doing, looks like it's being done at the switch level, but it's easy enough to avoid.

    --
    PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
  313. My ISP switched to 2 hour leases by SydShamino · · Score: 1

    ...and they suck. It knocked us offline for about 10 seconds every two hours when the IP address renewed, which is darn annoying if you play any online games.

    We have since gotten a static IP, which fixed the problem for $15 a month. :( I'm on the phone with the SBC today to see if the phone company has the same asinine leases with DSL.

    My ISP is Cox Communications btw.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  314. Re: not so fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not quite so simple. The cable installation folks have driving time to and from each residence, as well as time before each appointment (if either they arrive early or the resident arrives late). So if they're getting $17 for visiting your house, but it took 30 minutes to get there and 10 minutes to wait for you, then we're talking about much more than 5-10 minutes.

  315. Automatic escalation by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    aborchers wrote:

    It would not cost them a $50 support call to answer direct technical questions from experienced users if they would route questions properly based on their content. For example, if a user calls up, explains that he has changed network cards and asks to have the MAC entry changed in their database, it is not effective customer service to work through a thirty minute script only to end with an escalation to second line support when a direct bump to second line could have finished the call in one minute! (Example from my experience, obviously)

    I once got in the middle of a thread on the MindSpring customer-service newsgroups and posted a suggestion that they institute an "experienced customer" line. The idea being you get certified through them that yes, you really know what you're doing (maybe by taking the same tests of proficiency that their employees take?) and after that you're given access to a support line staffed by people who don't insist on going through the "is it turned on?" parts of the script. Who talk to you as though you have a clue, in other words. Hell, they could not only make money on it by charging a token fee (maybe $5 per month), they could use it as a pool to recruit new tech folks.

    Basically, phone centers need to program their script bots with something akin to keyword matching to determine when the caller is not going to be served by a cookbook of click heres and tab theres. In my experience, it is luck of the draw whether you get a first line rep who knows their stuff or is just following the script, and there are a lot of gradations between first and second line that could be subdivided more efficiently. Can it really be that cost ineffective to provide decent, non-irritating support to all levels of users, as opposed to just the clueless ones?

    It's all about metrics. If you don't force the techs to follow the same script, you can't effectively compare their performance and weed out the ones that aren't making good numbers. (The fact that you can't do that short of actually listening in on a tech's calls from time to time, we'll ignore for now.) ISO 9000 can be a good thing in its place; likewise Six-Sigma. This kind of cookie-cutter tech support is the worst possible application of both, but management just sees a documented, reproducible process and finds it Good.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
    1. Re:Automatic escalation by aborchers · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested in any numbers regarding incidence of escalation and how they correlate to specific customers. For example, if customer A has called twice and both times been escalated to second line support, was it because A had so munged things that first line couldn't help, or because A didn't need to call until the system was so broken on the providers' end that it required second line intervention? You'd think that over time such a database could be built and would be useful in routing support calls. If you have a customer who calls once a month and is always fixed at the first line by stepping through the dialog boxes, then they obviously don't make it to the "expert user" status.

      OTOH, I guess the quality of the product and the tech support are also key issues, and you can't trust any inference about your users unless you're sure the product is working as advertised and the techs are on the ball! :-)

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    2. Re:Automatic escalation by scoove · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find that dealing with tech support is uniformly frustrating for the advanced user because the providers are so focused on the clueless.

      Absolutely concur. I'm one of those half-suit/half-geek oddballs and I spend a good amount of time dealing with embedded system projects (miniturization of router systems we put in ugly places like water towers). I've gotten used to simply waiting for folks to go thru their routine - in fact, I usually either get some good reading material out, sort my files, etc. while dealing with the basic questions.

      But putting the service provider hat on, I'm not sure there is a good alternative (but I'm looking for one!!!). For instance, Old Man Kensey writes:

      institute an "experienced customer" line

      but acknowledges the issue with performance measurement. I'll stick to an even more basic concern: cost.

      I hate to say it, but most of the 80% category (clueless users) are pretty easy to help. Like my mother-in-law. They'll write down step-by-step instructions and never deviate. They correctly assume that it probably was something they did that made things wrong, and have a much better attitude to deal with.

      The 2% elite geeks never even call unless *we* have something wrong, so they're a breeze too (and have managed to evolve in a hostile world and are pretty savvy at handling their service provider).

      It's the 18% "sorta knowledgable" users that cost us bucks on support. You know the type, false high self-esteem, marginal competency. Can use Frontpage so they're a self-declared web guru. Knows how to ping, and thinks he's the inventor of IP. Constantly tinkers with his PC and screws it up, but is certain it was the service provider's doing (even though everything worked until that service pack was applied). They start the support call by yelling at people, send nasty emails demanding to receive a personal apology from the CEO and credit for a year's worth of service, etc.

      They'll monopolize the phone. Ask you a thousand questions unrelated to their most recent screwup. They'll suck you dry on support. When you finally figure out how they screwed it up (the one thing they are naturally good at), they assume the problem was secondary and the service provider is just covering up the problem. Then they'll break it again the next day.

      It would not cost them a $50 support call to answer direct technical questions from experienced users if they would route questions properly based on their content

      But how do I weed out the posers - They're 90% of the self-proclaimed experts, and would be nearly all of my calls.

      (Incidentally, we keep a record of the 2% on our network and watch for their communications. They also get bandwidth boosts, doubling their rate shaping limits, as a little thank you for being competent. They thank us back by letting us know when they see something we should know about)

      Perhaps the only solution is to charge for support like the phone company did - e.g. "if it's not our network, it's your bill."

      *scoove*

    3. Re:Automatic escalation by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      It's all about metrics. If you don't force the techs to follow the same script, you can't effectively compare their performance and weed out the ones that aren't making good numbers.

      What, you mean like when they fire the experienced techs that actually solve the customer's problem the first time because he takes too long?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Automatic escalation by Woody77 · · Score: 1

      In smaller support groups, this tends to happen. Certain e-mail addresses are immediately kicked up with, "XYZ's got a problem, I'll just let you look at it."

      Of course, I just normally walk through everything they need me to do, and then let them figure out really fast that I know more than they do, without me telling them so.

      I used to do support, and every now and then would get customers that knew more than me (early on, at least) about the products. Those were times when i'd bump it to a more knowledgeable person REAL fast.

    5. Re:Automatic escalation by MikeFM · · Score: 2

      The best method in my experience is to just hang on the line until you finally get someone at the top that actually knows what they are doiaisn't just reading a script. Get their name and extension. Be nice with them. Be brief. Write a letter to the company saying how helpful that person has been and is personally responsible for the extra money your spending on their companies services etc. This is a good way to have this person become your personal tech support guy for all future needs. It's even my experience that when that guy (or gal) leaves the company will try to find someone of equal skill to help you.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    6. Re:Automatic escalation by _typo · · Score: 2
      The 2% elite geeks never even call unless *we* have something wrong, so they're a breeze too (and have managed to evolve in a hostile world and are pretty savvy at handling their service provider).

      I guess your isp works alot better than mine then. I had a latency problem in my connection a few days ago where the jump from one router to the next would cost ~200ms at peek hours, but the transfer rate would be great anyway. I tried to get this solved for a week but the "helldesk" people wouldn't let me through to a real tech. Even though I pinpointed the problem, giving them the IP's to the relevant routers.

      After a while they fixed it (a ten minute telnet to the relevant router I'd guess) and not even once awnsered the e-mails the people at the helpdesk told me to write. All this while being very friendly to talk to.

      --

      Pedro Côrte-Real.

    7. Re:Automatic escalation by jazman · · Score: 1

      A view from within Support...

      So how does this work then?

      I get no end of people calling in with a problem, claiming to know lots and the root cause isn't X, so we go full circle, prove it can't be anything else, and the customer ends up eating humble pie and having to accept that it was X.

      If you provide an "I'm not stupid" line then everyone will end up calling it and you'll be no better off because everyone thinks they have a clue.

      And are you HONESTLY stating that you never miss the basics? That you have never explained a problem to a colleague and mid-explanation spotted that missing semicolon, or use of = instead of ==? Support start by asking basic questions because of Occam's Razor, not because we all assume you're stupid. Troubleshooting is largely a process of elimination, and eliminating the simple stuff to start with is an essential step.

      There's always the possibility that you are right of course. Give up your job, provide support that works that way and prove you are right to the rest of us by taking all our customers away from us. After all, what do we know? We've only been providing tech support for several decades.

  316. what about PPOE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My ISP (SWB) uses (shudder) PPOE for my DSL connection. Without my router to auto-login I am unable to connect without their crappy software.

    1. Re:what about PPOE? by BumbaCLot · · Score: 1

      Look for RASPPPOE. Some German guy wrote it and it's easily available online. You don't need to run Enternet 3000 or whatever PPPoE crap they want you to.

  317. Oh, yeah, I forgot the best part! by dochood · · Score: 1

    On my buddy's AT&T install, they told him that he had to have a virus checker, a firewall, and a WINDOWS 98 CERTIFICATE before they would install his cable modem! They had to come back because he couldn't locate a Windows 98 certificate!

    That's about the most ridiculous requirement I've ever heard, to require a Windows 98 certificate! I think I would have been so mad, I would have moved across the Missouri river to the St Louis side, where we have Charter!

    Fortunately, Charter took over the whole STL metro area, so I think he's got Charter now...

    dochood

  318. hmm. by Pan_God_of_Gods · · Score: 1

    I had AT&T Broadband installed the guy never even asked to use the computer. Although i did make him run a 15 foot cable from one side of the room to the other, so if nothing else i got some free coax out of it. =-)

  319. another scary thought by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    Okay, forget about the EULAs - you didn't agree to it, so no biggie, but what about this - did any of those submit buttons he hit send your new email address into the wonderful world of spam-lists? I bet it did. Eeek.

  320. Another solution by telstar · · Score: 2

    Tell them you're getting your PC next week, and thank him at the door.

  321. Old wine in new bottle by qohen · · Score: 1

    Time = Faster
    Functionality = Better
    Money = Cheaper

    As the old saw goes: "Faster, better, cheaper:
    pick any two"
    __
    DC

  322. Sheesh by Punchcard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    RANT MODE!

    I worked a short stint installing hsi back in the day, and I had to deal with smug pricks like the lot of you every goddamn day. Here's a few tips:

    1. The installer doesn't give a fuck about how many computers you have.
    2. The installer could care less about your 31337 Sun cluster or god damn Univac in the garage.
    3. The installer gets really annoyed when self-righteous geek zealots make their jobs difficult.

    "Hey, lets all guffaw at the college kid who can't figure out my ereet customized csh shell on my fucking VAX". Oh, wait, what's that? You want broadband? You're tired of dialup? Well then leave me alone and let me do my job, or next time do a self-install. Don't need a NIC? Tell me. Would rather configure the system yourself? Fine, tell me. I'm not out to cripple your machine, I am trying to get you connected to teh intarweb. The faster I get the hell out of your house, the faster I can get to the next unfortunate ex-AOL schmuck running WinME on an E-Machine whose hand I'll need to hold for three freaking hours because they can't figure out god damn Outlook Express.

    Don't try to impress me with your gigabit switches or Cisco PIXes. I've seen it all and could care less. If I could have tied a cable modem to a brick with a length of cat5 and hurled it through some of your living room windows with a note reading "Self Install Kit", I would have.

    Oh! Guess what else??

    I'm a geek too. I run fourteen machines in my bedroom. Five FreeBSD servers, two Windows 2000 servers, two OpenBSD firewalls, a Sun box, and an array of Linux, W2K, and BSD workstations. I loved turning the tables on Slashdot-esque geeks who thought they could get a kick out of playing 'confuse the installer'. Some of my peers were even geekier, and have since moved on to real jobs maintaining the fat pipes companies like Comcast, AT&T, etc. rely on to move their bits.

    Moral? Give the installers a break.

    END RANT MODE

    1. Re:Sheesh by cenobita · · Score: 1

      unfortunately, i hardly think it's that simple.

      when i purchase a product, i do not want extraneous bullshit. this includes software. i run freebsd, thus i do not NEED the software, nor am i going to install vmware or wine just to "let the installer do his job".

      we spent nearly an hour waiting for that jackass to "do his job", while he fiddled with software he barely knew how to install, when we could've set the whole damned thing up without him even touching anything. if we'd been given the option to configure it ourselves, we would've gladly taken it. i'll give the installer a break when he can display at least a minimal level of competence, not waste my time, and the company he/she works for stops being so pro-active towards windows morons.

      we had to pull out a shit windows machine from the closet so he could do his job. the point is, we shouldn't have to. companies (in this case, at&t) need to start having a little more of a broad view when it comes to who their customers are. they need to realize that not only do many people know more about their product than their installers do, and that they aren't all running windows. we shouldn't have to handhold their employees, and make special accomodations for them, just to get the product we're paying for.

      so fuck your rant. it isn't my job to give the installer a break; it's to help provide them with a paycheck, in exchange for a service. christ, it took 2 minutes just for the dipshit to understand what i was talking about when i asked him how much cat5 he needed. to me, this indicates two things:

      1. that they believe 99.9% of their customers to be idiots. in northern california (where i live), i hardly think this is an appropriate stance to take. 2. that their employees don't need to have at least a BASIC understanding of what they're doing, because they have a little instruction booklet that says how to do it.

      maybe it's just me, but i find all of the above to be pretty high on the bullshit meter.

    2. Re:Sheesh by Punchcard · · Score: 1

      So stop wasting the installers time and do a self install. Do you complain about all the extra food when you order a value meal and only wanted the fries? Sure, the food is poisoned, but you decide whether to eat it or not.

      If you are dealing with a provider that does not permit self installs, then maybe you need to change providers. I understand your position but you are the customer and you need to call the shots. My rant was pointed more at the elitist fucknecks who seem to think the tech making $11 a hour (who, 99% of the time, deals with brain-dead Win9x users) should be versed in every fucking OS and system config known to mankind, or at the very least keep a stable of computer scientists on alert to respond to the self-proclaimed geeks who in reality seem to need more maintenance than anyone else.

      If you did not make your requirements known to your provider before the installer came out, and did not establish with the installer that you would prefer to handle everything beyond the actual modem installation, it is your own fucking fault. Just standing there staring googlyeyed at the tech as he fumbles with your ENIAC entitles you to exactly 0 complaint credits.

      Granted, I agree wholeheartedly there are plenty of incompetent techs out there who frankly shouldn't even be permitted to drive a car to work (and I make absolutely no excuses for them), but as evidenced here, there is also a multitude of arrogant customers who expect Stallman, Grove, and Torvalds themselves to pull up in the Mystery Machine and plug them into the World Wide Wait. Fuck that, if you're so goddamn smart, why do you need someone to come to your house to plug in an AC adapter, twist on an F connector, and plug in a cat5 patch cord?

    3. Re:Sheesh by cenobita · · Score: 1

      unfortunately, we *can't* change providers. at&t is the only company (that i'm aware of) that provides cable service to midtown sacramento. i would've greatly preferred dsl, but my girlfriend wanted cable instead. believe me, i would've been quite happy to call the shots on how it was installed. despite specifying our requirements, as well as outright asking the tech if he could just hand us the modem and info and be on his merry way, we were refused, and given the "i have to install this" line. when i asked him if he was aware that we weren't going to be hooking up a windows machine, he tried arguing with us about it until i pulled one out of the closet. however, having previously worked retail, i *do* share your opinion about elitist fucknecks who think that employees of whatever company they're going through, for any kind of product, should know EVERYTHING. in this case, i don't think the tech should know anything about non-windows and/or mac operating systems. even if he did, i wouldn't let him touch my non-windows systems, simply because i'm an anal retentive geek :p

    4. Re:Sheesh by Punchcard · · Score: 1

      Aha! So it's your girlfriends fault! =P

      Seriously, I am just trying to make people aware of the other side of the coin. Sounds like you were kinda stuck and nobody had much choice. I can't speak for the tech who worked on your equipment but where I worked if the customer wanted to do the install themselves, or had a bizzare system configuration we couldn't fathom, we would have them sign a waiver and be on our merry way.

      Some companies require their techs to follow a "standard procedures" checklist, some don't. I think your tech was either required to do things a certain way, or just didn't know any better and/or was stupid. The problem as you sort of mentioned previously is a lot of these broadband companies are hiring dimwits right out of high school, giving them a brief tutorial on what they need to do *most* of the time, and then kicking them out the door with the keys to a van, a bunch of hardware, and a schedule.

      Since you worked retail you are familiar with both sides of the customer/business relationship...generally business will take place just fine, but there are always the mediocre techs/salespeople, or the customers with ridiculous expectations.

      I still work as a tech (networks/hardware/consulting/desktop support, that sort of thing) so I still deal with the entire range of customers and suppliers. The fun never ends.

      Like a wise person once said in a hardware newsgroup...you never hear from the people that don't have problems.

    5. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point is, that like any other good wage-slave, the installer is just doing his/her job. Some of these people are morons who should never have been hired, others are a lot smarter than you, and are bored out of their skulls by the pathetic job they had to take. They really have no personal interest in the bozo that got their company's service. Be than bozo smart, stupid, someone's grandma or Selma Hayek. They simply need to finish an X number of installs during that day to get paid, and want you to let them do so as soon as possible. They have no more interest in providing quality service than the clerk at your local 7-11. This doesnt make them evil, or minions of evil. It makes them EMPLOYEES. You want results - speak to someone high enough on the managerial chain of command to have nothing better to do with their time than care what other people think of the service.

    6. Re:Sheesh by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      I hate to point this out to you back, but I'm sick of calling cable installers and telling them to give me the modem, wait for the sync and leave; I can do my _own_ wiring and I can do my _own_ computer configuration. The only part I want from them is the service to be functional at all -- they can take their software _and_ their attitude and shove it.

      The attitude should be "you're the customer", not "leave me alone".

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    7. Re:Sheesh by Punchcard · · Score: 1

      I agree with your sentiments, but did you even bother to really read any of the posts in this thread? Where I pretty much said all you had to do was TELL ME and I would hand you the hardware and walk? Where I said, and I quote, "you are the customer and you need to call the shots"?

      Taking your frustrations out on installers is gonna get you nowhere. You need to move your grievances up the chain to people that actually have *influence*.

      I'm sorry you are *tired* of calling cable installers - is that your 9 to 5 job? Calling cable installers all day? Because hooking up modems for indignant pricks is the installer's 9 to 5 job.

      I am a cable internet customer. I'm not real happy with the service (let's hear it for 128Kb/s upstream caps!), but I never, ever had a tech in my house. About a year ago I picked up an install kit at Circuit Shitty, plugged it in, called the 800 number to set up the account, and I was online in minutes. Replaced the rented COM21 modem last week with a purchased Linksys BEFCMU10 - that involved one phone call to provision the new modem. I know not all providers are as accomodating, but if you complain to the RIGHT people for the RIGHT reasons, things may change.

    8. Re:Sheesh by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      In fact, my 9-5 job is being the C.T.O. of an Internet hosting company and I spend a lot of time on the phone with cable companies getting high-speed Internet access for my customers.

      Having to spend your day dealing with cable tech support is probably worse than being a cable installer; I used to have a 9-5 job installing dial-up Internet access on Windows 3.1 machines, so I have a fairly good handle on the frustrations involved.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  323. Don't break the rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to SBD Yahoo, you have no choice but to use the software. If it doesn't run on your OS of choice, you cannot use SBC Yahoo:

    IN ORDER TO ACCESS THE SBC YAHOO! DSL YOU MUST BE AT LEAST 18 YEARS OLD AND MUST ALREADY HAVE OR MUST NOW INSTALL THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE "REQUIRED SOFTWARE." THE REQUIRED SOFTWARE INCLUDES ...(some deleted)... AND BROADJUMP, INC.

  324. Recent Comcast installation, no software by ecarlson · · Score: 1

    My sister just had a Comcast cable modem installed, and I was there to watch, and the installer didn't try to install any software. I even asked him if he was planning to install the Comcast software (so I could tell him not to), and he said no.

    FYI: My sister already had ZoneAlarm installed, and I installed a hardware router for her a few days later.

    I've also had Comcast for a few years, and they didn't try to install any software on my system.

    --
    - Eric, InvisibleRobot.com
  325. Broadjump by Skord · · Score: 1

    The broadjump software is great. If you don't want it, uninstall it. As a former tech support rep, I'd love something like this. Most people will go braindead if you ask them what kind of ethernet card they have. Let alone if they have two or some other proprietary network adapter. You have NO IDEA how many people don't know how to even double click and call up and say "The Intarnet is Broke".

  326. Actually... by tellezj · · Score: 1

    a decent cable modem can be less than $50, try here.

    --

    End of Line.

  327. Don't worry about it by drfreak · · Score: 1

    if you are smart enough to know the difference. The installer guy who did my cable modem said the same thing where he had to install some software for it to work. He said it had to run in Windows so I booted Windows 2000 Professional inside a VMware session for him. The installer guy doesn't care whether I use the software or not; he just had to go through it on his checklist and have me sign the form. All this software did in my case was fire up explorer so he could get to the cable modem's web admin tools. Once that was done, he just loaded some cheezy software to set up my mail accounts. He was well aware that the software (in fact the entire windows installation) would be deleted when he left.

  328. Assholieness can work both ways. by tres3 · · Score: 1
    Step 1. Pull out that old 486/33 from the closet and dust it off.

    Step 2. Install a default Windows 95. (or better yet a 3.11 -- if you can find it)

    Step 3. Make sure there is only about 16 MB of RAM.

    Step 4. Invite the installer in and tell him/her to proceed with the installation.

    Step 5. Wait for him/her to ask a question and kindly explain that your significant other does not allow you to touch the computer and that they scare you. State your refusal to click on anything (including an EULA).

    Step 6. Watch them squirm/cuss/moan/etc.

    Step 7. Wait for them to leave.

    Step 8. Unplug the crappy Winblows box and place back in the closet for the next time you need an installer to come out (line diagnosis, running new drops, etc.)

    Step 9. Retrieve the dual Athalon 2000+MP machine from its hiding place and plug it in.

    Step 10. Enable DHCP/PPPoE in Debian.

    Step 11. Share your entertaining afternoon with other Slashdotters -- we all need humor in our lives.

  329. They didn't install anything. by llzackll · · Score: 1

    They just ran some cable, and hooked up the Modem. Didn't even touch or turn on the PC. When he was done he gave me some software and left. I didn't even bother with the software, I just turned on the PC and I was connected to the net.

  330. att cable too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i recently had a cable modem installed. when ordering specifically asked if i needed windows or mac for the install and they said nope.
    well sure enuff dude comes over hookes up line plugins modem. i got to check for connection and nothing. finally give up boot into windows slap the install diak and it registers the modem in my name.
    fine and dandy until i try to change my ip on a seperate nic under windows.
    properties on connection?Crash!
    uninstall cable software? Crash!
    Reinstall whole POSOS and stuff works again.
    im still not sure if the software was intended to make changing the ip impossible or not. ohwell it works now so i shouldnt complain too much.

  331. Worse stuff than BCF is installed by rojoman · · Score: 1

    Take a look at your startup list, you will find C:\Program Files\Support.com\bin\tgcmd.exe /server the WinVNC server running. Nothing like putting a backdoor on your Cable Internet connection is there? I know it is a support tool but it is also a remote control tool originally designed for accessing a home Windoz system from a work based Linux system.

  332. What I did... by Alphi1 · · Score: 1

    One thing that I did, mostly in case the installer messed something up on my system, is I did a full backup just before the installer came (and in this case, I basically just made an image of my C: drive with Drive Image, and stored that on another partition). Then, when the guy left, I simply restored from that backup. No muss, no fuss.

  333. Re:IF they're like mine. . by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

    When you call tech support, you find out none of the tech support staff has even heard of Linux and refuse to even talk to you.

    I work for a telco in New Zealand.
    Tech support has two levels - those who answer the 0800 number in the call centre, who deal with the common problems (windows only), and those who deal with the technical problems.
    When you get put thru to the technical people you may strike a linux savy tech, or if unlucky you'll strike an MCSE moron.

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  334. @home changed over to comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When @home went out of business and comcast took over the cable service, they send you this disc for "activation of the new service". And like enos it had the broadjump software. I was stupid for installing it because they said the only way to get email to work was to install the software, even though that is not true. Anyway, had I never installed I would have never agreeded to the EULA that comcast cable service had, and technically would not have follow the rules. I read the @home EULA and it says that @home can change the EULA at anytime, however it does not say that some other cable service could.....thus...I would be running my service with out any legal agreement.

  335. That's not considered best practice by Royster · · Score: 2

    The point of a firewall to to stand between your PC and the Internet to stop undesired connections from the outside world onto your local network. You haven't stopped that at all unless you make all packets go in one NIC and out another before getting to your local network.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  336. Acceptable overhead by Royster · · Score: 2

    There's always some overhead in filtering packets. I don't get unacceptable download times. All of the speed tests I've run have been acceptable.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    1. Re:Acceptable overhead by satterth · · Score: 1
      They must have improved the code alot then. The older router i was using was a huge hit. 128kb/s without and 80kb/s with. Kinda noticable in my last usage.

      Its good to hear that they have improved, maybe its time to look into them again.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  337. Guys.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can someone help please ?

    My winXP machine crashed and won't start.
    So I am forced to use Gentoo Linux, but it bores me because everything just works and never any problem.

    How can I use winxp to have problems and viruses ?

  338. If possible, transfer services. I use Speakeasy by zipwow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Speakeasy DSL, if its available, is a good provider. They "allow" and support Linux boxes, and even provide their own gaming servers.

    I haven't checked on their P2P policies, but I'd be suprised if they're draconian.

    No OS or software requirements, self-install is an option, and the tech people have been very friendly, available, and intelligent.

    And, currently, they're giving away an XBOX or PS2 with new accounts. Granted, you have to buy the DSL bridge for about the same amount, so its more or less a rebate, but still.

    If you sign up, tell 'em Kevin Klinemeier (userid Klinemeiers) in Seattle sent you.

    -Zipwow

    And to clarify: NO I am NOT a Speakeasy rep. I just like their services.

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
  339. Of course this is evil.... by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    Of course this is evil. It is a company doing something that it damn well knows will be offensive to the other party, but trying to sneak it through by willfully keeping that other party in the dark (by having their agent click through the EULAs) or intimidation once discovered.

    Think about it this way: if they truly had nothing to hide, they wouldn't hide. The company wouldn't hesitate to admit the fact that it's collecting data, and what data it is collecting, up front. Just like a Nielson ratings household. The mere fact that they go to such lengths to hide the presence of this software screams to a "guilty mind."

    As for your analogy to the sniper, that's obscene. I'm horny, where's your sister (or underage daughter), I want to fuck her. She may call it rape, but hey it's not like I shot 14 people, killing 10, so she can't complain. I mean, it's not like I KILLED her and 9 of her friends, now is it?....

    Shocked? Good, now maybe you'll understand that ethical behavior is absolute, not relative. In fact, in this specific case the data collection may be more evil than the cold-blooded murder of 10 people since the information collected could potentially be used to identify suitable victims of a serial rapist/murder. It would not be the first time that databases have been used in this way, and in fact any ethical database designer knows this and will go to some effort to prevent "find me a victim" type queries.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:Of course this is evil.... by (trb001) · · Score: 2

      As for your analogy to the sniper, that's obscene.

      Actually, I was contrasting them to show just how large a margin there is between an evil act and an immoral one. Had I been comparing their similarities, then you could have justified taking me out behind the woodshed and beating me to death.

      Good, now maybe you'll understand that ethical behavior is absolute, not relative.

      I'll give you that ethical behavior is absolute, but this did not cross the line between evil and immoral. IMHO, it's not even jumping on top of the line or anywhere in sight of the line. It's clearly on the immoral side, since nobody is getting hurt physically/emotionally/financially.

      I'm horny, where's your sister (or underage daughter), I want to fuck her. She may call it rape, but hey it's not like I shot 14 people, killing 10, so she can't complain. I mean, it's not like I KILLED her and 9 of her friends, now is it?....

      This is just assanine...I didn't think I would have to go into specifics (though, I did in a follow up post) about molestation being included as an evil act. I was giving examples that came to mind, extreme examples, and raping my sister wasn't one that came to mind (having no sister, mind you). Ofcourse this is an evil act, but you disprove your own point...how much ethical room is inbetween installing spyware and raping teenage girls? A lot.

      --trb

  340. Re:Have a honeypot - an old MAC by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    Sorry matey, MacTCP on System 7 didn't.

    In fact, I'm not so sure that MacTCP had DHCP *at all*. I never ever got it working, even when it said it was set to get an address automatically. Perhaps it was BOOTP?

  341. Software? What software? by Francis+Rogers · · Score: 1

    I had Comcast cable internet installed back in February, and closely monitored what the cable guy was doing on my computer (running WinXP). All he did was check my network settings to make sure they were okay, and then he brought up Internet Explorer to test the connection. He didn't install any software at all. However, I'm not surprised Comcast would be trying to collect advertising demographics, because the on-screen displays on my expensive digital cable are full of ads. Plus, Comcast is known for screwing over their cable Internet customers, particularly ones using NAT boxes.

  342. Er... someone "tested" the uninstaller right? by Sleepy · · Score: 2

    Uninstallers don't HAVE to uninstall anything. Uninstalling various spyware-infested Windows apps, often leave the spyware behind (duh...).

    I wonder if Ad Aware detects this app?

  343. my install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i got cable a few years ago before the spyware fad.
    the cable dude setup the ip and all, then set up netquake for me (meaning he downloaded winquake and showed us how to use it)

    hell yeah

  344. OptOnline by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    You go to the store where they give you a box with software and a cable modem. You install it yourself.

    EXCELLENT!

  345. Simple answer. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Any cable internet install guy I've seen will let you simply declare that you don't want him to touch your computer, and that you will happily sign off on whatever he wants.

    Some have a spot for "customer declined to have such-and-such installed" and you can sign that.

    Others, the guy will just let you sign off, especially if you are polite and let him know that you do know what you are doing, and it's not going back to haunt him.

    Traditionally, if the installer doesn't do something right, then support can't support it right, and he gets in shit.

    Let him know you'll sign whatever it is and cooperate in any way so he doesn't personally get in trouble, give him a cup of coffee, and send him on his way.

  346. POKE 65495,0? You ARE old! by Tsar · · Score: 3, Funny

    For those who really don't remember (or who followed a different track to geekdom), executing that line on your TRS-80 Color Computer would make ROM cartridge programs run twice as fast, and bump up your BASIC program speed by about 50%. Of course, you'd better POKE 65496,0 when you're done, so your 'half-fast' cassette recorder would work again.

    It wasn't all that noticeable with a single machine, but I once had a Beowulf cluster of these babies, and...

  347. Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 by madhattr · · Score: 2, Informative

    We have been reading and discussing privacy in class at Portland State University. I ran across this and might give you an idea of what you as a cable subscriber could do to try to keep some privacy.

    Check out
    The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984.
    My book explains it this way; "A cable subscriber must be informed of any personal data collected (and when), and the use and availability there will be of such information."

    I am no lawyer, but there might be something to this.. Since it is on the books.

  348. I have OS X; they didn't try to install anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cable guy just checked out my cable outlet (turns out the one nearest the computer doesn't work), plugged his own PC laptop in to make sure the connection worked, and that was that.

  349. Re:rabid power-users - short answer: backdoor by cdn-programmer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ok so the short answer is that it is a back door. There is just no way I'll hand over root access to any of my machines. Sorry.

    Any tech installing crap like this in any of my systems will be facing a judge. Cracking is cracking regardless how it is done.

  350. Terminate RegCon.exe and CFD.exe .... by Makarand · · Score: 1

    I use broadband from AT&T (ATTBI) and they installed software from BroadJump mentioned here. The cable installer clicked on all the agreements for me. However, after I boot my NT machine I kill RegCon.exe and CFD.exe using the task manager before using the internet. You can use ZoneAlarm to shut out all spyware communication if there is any. I have not yet taken the risk of removing the software that was installed on my PC. If something stops working ( for whatever reason ) the last thing I would like is to be kept on HOLD for 1/2 hr by AT&T. I would like to know from others if removing BroadJump software is completely safe.

  351. Adelphia Powerlink has it right !! by Phantom_24 · · Score: 1

    One of THE cheapest cable net providers, as well as a nice STABLE connection with failry decent connection. All this with NO SOFTWARE installed for the Surfboard 3100/4100 they provide! I'd go DSL if I can before I even touch something like Roadrunner if they ever creeped in the Buffalo, NY area....and I HATE DSL!! Thats how much I think of RR and other companies that think you should install software to run their basically driverless cable modems !

  352. I always set up a blank PC for them. by DarkHelmet433 · · Score: 1

    The last time I had a cable install done (june this year), they needed to log into something on their internal network to activate the modem (AT&T broadband, SF Bay Area).

    I had already set up a blank install on a machine for him, just in case I couldn't talk him out of installing the stuff. I told him so. I also told him that the computer that I normally use is still plugged in at the old house and that I probably wasn't going to use the one here, and that I'd be quite happy for him not to touch the this machine (as I wasn't going to use it) and I'd sign his checklist for him anyway.

    He looked at me as though I might have been from some internal AT&T "sting" operation to check on the installers for a few seconds, then asked me if I was sure, and then he was happy. I signed the checklist, and he was out of there in 5 minutes flat.

    Personally, I think the best policy is to tell them up front what you want and that you're willing to sign off on the install anyway. Once they realize that the work they'd be doing would be a waste anyway, most will see the light. Most. Some will be bloody-minded about it and are not worth fighting with. But even then it is ok because you only let them near the blank install.

  353. I actually have a good cable company?! by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    I had cable installed about a year and a half ago. The installers for my cable company (Millenium Digital Media) didn't even touch the computer. All they did was install a line splitter/filter (of course, they also had to put new connectors on the cable they cut) and run a new cable from the splitter to the cable modem. Just in case, I did have a quasi-honeypot set up in advance... A dual-boot computer running Win98 and Linux. Our cable network seems to use the cable modems MAC address for authentication.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  354. linux prevents this by harmanjd · · Score: 1

    When the cable guys were doing my install, I told them that my computer was running Linux. They weren't allowed to touch anything not running Windows, so they didn't install anything for me, other than the modem.

  355. Self install and save $100 by AsmordeanX · · Score: 1

    Here you can let the cableguy do the software install or you can do it yourself and save $100. I asked how many people do self installs. He said about 5%. He prefers them because it takes 10 minutes to do an install while full installs can go from 15 mintues of installing software to hours for real dumb people. He told me about one woman who had to phone her husband because she was scared to let the guy open up her PC to install a 10BaseT card.

  356. Defeating the Win internet stack... by Badanov · · Score: 1

    I installed an AMD XP using 98lite, keeping out all the extra and dangerous stuff that comes with a typical Windows 98 installation. Now were I to use my DSL provider's software, the requirement would be for me to boot the machine every time I lost a connection, but with this installation, all I did was set the numbers and I am online, no booting required. Of course with the XP the machine boots up so quickly that it is not a problem, but the benefit the way I see it is I don't have to worry about problems which have arisen if I used the full Windows setup, and the DSL's software. I saw the little jabs earlier about those who log on here having more knowledge about the requirements for getting a machine online, where that knowledge is greater than 99 percent of the rest of the population: So what? I log on here to learn from knowledgable people in the computer/IT industry and if the display of that knowledge bothers you, maybe you should forgo reading this material. Part of learning is displaying knowledge or, in my case, my understanding of something, and if I get called or corrected on something, I may look silly, but I learn something and can apply it. How is that irksome to some people? Enlighten me. Make me understand...

    --
    Dawn of the Dead
  357. He took one look at Gnome and... by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    Xscreensaver was running when they came in to install my cable modem. The guy moved the mouse and was apparently struck dumb by the sight of a maximized xterm. The kid he was training knew what it was and told him to just sign off on it. :)

  358. my installation by v1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When the cable installers (there were two, one was in training) showed up, I took the offensive and was showing them how the installation was going to go. Their original plan had them using the ~20 year old existing coax, drilling a hole in my floor and yanking the coax up through that. No. You'll be running fresh coax (and my wirecutters proved the point) and be pulling it up through the wall. We argued about that for a bit, as they insisted it was impossible to pull through the wall. I pointed to the network cables going up through the wall, and they changed their mind.

    Then they were just going to drill a hole in the wall and pull the cable through. No. Wall plate. So they go out and get a wall plate from the truck. (they have this stuff, they just don't want to USE it!) So he makes a hole in the plate and is preceeding to pull the coax THROUGH the plate. No. "Have you EVER done this before? Get a feed-through connector!" I could see in his eyes, "crap... that's TWO more connections I'm going to have to crimp..." And so we finally have a good hardware installation, and they cut me a nice 5ft length of coax to jump between the wall and the modem. The guy has a nic card in his hand and starts trying to find the computer. Heh, laptop, fewl. He gets out his magic CD and I simply say "No." He realized long before this that I wasn't worth fighting with and just had me initial that I had refused their software install.

    I can't claim total victory though. They assured me the modem would take a few hours to sync up, and that they couldn't stay to make sure it was working, so I let them leave. Half an hour later I got impatient and called the service number, and they assured me they were required to stay until the sync light was on. Owell. A few minutes into the call the sync came on and all was well anyway.

    Since then I have talked with numerous people that have allowed the techs to install the software, and it's really annoying. I don't know what all covert things it is capable of, but it has the obvious effect of messing with your browser by changing the animation icon to an animation of the company's logo, and of course changes your home page.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  359. Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, when the tech came to install DSL at my place, he first tested the line and all that junk. Then he proceded to take out a cd and noticed that I have a mac. He seemed concerned at first, but I simply put in my username and password into the pppoe panel that's built in to os x and it just worked. The guy was freakin amazed that it just worked. He said that was the easiest install he had ever seen and left right after I signed the papers.

  360. I am a cable installer by Postalbunny · · Score: 1

    I am a cable modem installer, or TW and Charter pipeline. I will let you know that I HATE THAT BJ DISK. We do have to run it, and we do HAVE to send the information to bj for them to collect and it sends a verification hex number back. Without that number on the workorder we get charged back. NOW, mandrake? NO PROBLEM, I'm not allowed to even touch your computer now. We don't even support win95 anymore. If the disk doesn't complete we don't get paid, and it doesn't even setup the computer... it tries to dial AOL to connect sometimes when it's set to never dial! I've contacted BJ over the last 3 years to let them know how to make the software faster (it's written in xml and flash), how to avoid compat problems, they don't care. They want the demographic info, and it reports on a timed interval too. Anyone interested in helping me hack the software to bypass all this nonsense email postalbunny@hotmail.com I've got broken-ass copies that barely work... i don't want to install software on anyones computer any more than they want it there!

  361. Even better... by atroxi · · Score: 1

    ...the Comcast guy didn't even set a foot in the house!

    However, he did steal the new splitter I had installed outside the day before.

    Jerk.

  362. BIND by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

    Maybe I just haven't bothered to look hard enough, but I didn't know there were any other Open Source name servers out there. djbdns doesn't count and we both already know that so don't bother with beating that dead horse.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:BIND by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 2
      Maybe I just haven't bothered to look hard enough,

      Like maybe an actual search?


      but I didn't know there were any other Open Source name servers out there.

      You mean, like these?

      djbdns doesn't count and we both already know that

      Ah, I see. It's not "Open Source" software because it isn't published under an "Open Source" license, right? (sigh) Dan Bernstein is a total security freak. He doesn't trust ANYBODY. He especially doesn't trust anybody to distribute modified, binary versions of his software, ruining his reputation when one of their "enhancements" results in a security hole. This already happened once when a Qmail add-on was discovered to have a security problem, and thereby tarnished Qmail's otherwise perfect security record.

      So he ONLY authorizies distribution of his ORIGINAL source code. No modifications allowed, except as diffs to the originals. And if you apply those diffs and something breaks, don't blame him; blame the author of the diff.

      You might disagree with Dan; he's a hard-nosed, inflexible so-and-so. But he's got style, and his programs are a beautiful model of efficiency.

      The Open Source community could use a few more people like Dan.

      and we both already know that so don't bother with beating that dead horse.

      Such Style! Such Wit! Such Argument! Such Rhetoric! Such Unquestionable Authority!

      Such a sterling example of my sigfile:

      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
  363. my cable internet installer told me what it was by Bad_CRC · · Score: 2
    he showed up 20 minutes late, then had to run 200 feet of cable through my back yard, then through my garage into my office, so by the time he got to my pc it was after 7pm. And he was pissed at working so late. He told me I should sign a disclaimer so he didnt have to screw with installing the client software for charter. I asked him wtf the software was that I was signing a paper saying I refused to have it installed on my PC, and he told me that it was a backdoor for them to access my PC for helpdesk calls and such... but said that I didnt hear it from him.

    So, I didnt end up with that software, which is good, but in the process I also didnt get a username or login for email or web space.

    Course, I didnt get a copy of the sheet I signed stating that I refused the software, so I dont knwo if it was the truth or not.

    1. Re:my cable internet installer told me what it was by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      uh, he WAS the cable guy. Saying you will come by anywhere between 8am and 5pm is not being late.

    2. Re:my cable internet installer told me what it was by Postalbunny · · Score: 1

      What did that cable guy look like/drive?

  364. Lots of stories.... by jester86 · · Score: 1

    ...but the people that read slashdot already know that this shit shouldn't be on our PCs. The people that don't read here are the ones I believe the author was concerned about. We should concentrate more on convincing end users they should be concerned with what is on their PCs. Its hard to convince my girlfriend not to install mp3 sharing programs because they have backdoors...but she wants her mp3s. Leads me getting them for her if I don't want it on her machine.

    However, I had no idea what it was like outside of MN/ND. From my experieces, its always self install or PAY EXTRA to have the tech come out and do it. I've had both Cable and DSL, neither of which required software. I never thought some ISPs would force the tech into my living space.

    I used to think it was funny to go to Best Buy and argue why Macs or machines running linux were superior to the windoze machines they were selling. After about 2 sentences they left and the employees learned to avoid me. They didn't care, they just wanted commission on their PCs and found they had no valid arguement to convince me their cheap ass e-machine was ever going home with me. Just like the cable installer....he doesn't care, he just knows as much as he has to and possibly what he wants too.

    Another little bit of advice....Run portsentry in your flavor of unix/linux. Its made my firewalling so easy. I just add a few machines I know I don't want to IPtables and portsentry will do the rest.

  365. Re:rabid power-users - short answer: backdoor by ducktape · · Score: 1

    did you actually read what i wrote, or did you just stop on the word 'VNC-like'. there is no backdoor, it cannot be accessed without the USER choosing to connect. it's not really even a server program... it's actually 2 client apps. one for the user, and one for tech. the connection is held through the intermediary server. the server cannot contact your client software, the only way a connection takes place is if the user initiates contact.

  366. Turning off non-paying customers, moving routers by billstewart · · Score: 3, Informative
    There's no good reason for DSL to use PPPoE - the underlying technology is usually ATM, which uses Permanent Virtual Circuits (ISO protocol layer 2 connections that let you multiplex multiple connections on a point-to-point wire), and they can use ATM switches to deliver either ATM or Frame Relay connections to the ISP. Works just fine, and you can do either static or dynamic routing with no problem, though it tends to use a bit more IP address space than bridging solutions.

    The two things that PPPoE seems to accomplish are to give the telcos (or other CLECs) and ISPs a bit more flexibility about where to put routers - it makes it easier to terminate the PVC on a shared router at the telco POP instead of requiring either an ATM connection to the ISP or an ISP-owned router at the POP. The authentication features also makes it a bit easier to turn off service to people if they haven't paid their bills, for the case where the telco/CLEC is providing a shared router at the POP. (If the ISP has a PVC all the way back to their router, they can do the same thing by disabling the PVC in their router.)

    Mostly it's ugly.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  367. What I was hired to do (not)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hokay, I spent a year as a PC tech riding shotgun with cable installers hooking up @Home. Note, this is going on two years ago now, BTW.

    The installation package as I recall, came with Netscape and IE as the two options. Which one we should install varied by how buggy they were in each version of the @Home CD. Also, the CD carried both PC and Mac versions. Basically, @Home got ahold of the SDKs for the browsers, and hacked them up to use the @Home logos and fonts. Then, they would pass this source on to the cable operators, who would apply a second layer of hacks to brand it as their own particular branch, BOBsCable@Home.

    Then there were some fonts. Most PCs had them, but most Macs didn't. The Mac install defaulted to installing them, which would nuke the machine. Like, "where's your restore disk?" nuke. No, I *was* the "last resort" guy in the company.

    Then, in a class all there own, we had the "helper" apps. Some of these things weren't listed on the "custom install" menu, and internally I couldn't get an answer to what they were. It was '99 and '00, so not quite as nasty as today's junk, I think, but who knows. what I could identify looked like some QoS monitoring and a little "dashboard" app.

    That dashboard basially existed to list upcoming TV shows and in later versions to throw banner ads at you. You could log in and get a yes|no answer to "do I have mail?" I think it also did stock quotes. Once upon a time there were also registry patches applied for better throughput, but for some reason they dropped them. Can't imagine why... O:)

    Needless to say, this all served to keep me and my co-workers interested. Realize that cablemodems, by and large, are a raw TCP/IP stack, no login or PPPoE software. Very nice. Then, they required that the PC be configured with a specific computer name they provide. Now, they just track your MAC address in their DHCP database. It annoyed me that I was supposed to take this very effective and open 'net connection and break it by installing the @Hosed Disk of Death.

    For "niche" hookups, I definately prefer using cablemodems. I can hook anything up to them and get connectivity[0].

    I always took up a client that declined a software install. Especially after @Home went to IE 5 as the preferred browser to install. Took a dog's age to do that one. Just wrote "per customer's request" on the work order. Easiest way to get a customer to request no software was to say "Hi. Have you used the internet before? Good. Two options: A) I change how everything looks and works, so that it matches the book. B) I set it up so everything you've learned to do before works exactly the same way, but way faster with a new email address." Three guesses what was the favorite path, and the first two don't count.

    And then there was the time that all the cablemodem providers in Canada donated PCs and cablemodems to schools. Those had all the above installed in all their glory, and CyberPatrol on top. Anyone wanna guess how fast those machines "broke"?

    I'm now on to bigger and better things.

    0 - I wasn't your standard Cable Ape. Yes, I could connect 'nixes. Yes, I could even connect DOS 6.

  368. Oh Come On! by BaileyUARK.edu · · Score: 1

    This is complete BS. If the average (Brainless) computer user can't plug a cable into the back of a tower and config a thing or two, then they shouldn't have the "Right" to use a computer. I don't understand why the average person can't read a set of semi-detailed directions and figure something relatively easy out. They don't need someone to come over and hook their new X-Box or Gamecube system up, now do they? This problem would never exist if the end-user would take alittle initative and do something on their own. GOD FORBID. Thats my two cents, take it or leave it.

  369. BSOD Screen Saver by billstewart · · Score: 1

    While you're at it, might as well run the Blue Screen of Death screensaver just so everything looks normal.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  370. Win98 may require release/renew. 2kpro doesn't by billstewart · · Score: 2
    We're running Win2000 Pro, and it seems to figure out that whenever you unplug / replug the cable it should renew or replace its dhcp lease. MS may still be clueless about how networking should work, but the stuff really is getting friendlier.


    With Win98 and its relatives like Win98 SE, if your TCP/IP is set for DHCP (as opposed to having a static address), and you've got a DHCP lease that hasn't expired, you need to use the WinIPcfg tool to release the DHCP lease and renew it. If your PC is a laptop that you carry between two offices and your home LAN, you end up doing this a lot.... If one of your operating modes is to set the PC for static addressing (as opposed to using DHCP where your DSL router's dhcpd always gives you the same address), then of course you've got to go through the Control Panel, change the settings, reboot, yadda yadda.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  371. Routers/Bridges/PPPoA/etc. by billstewart · · Score: 2
    A USB device can perfectly well be a router - the issue is whether the IP addresses on the two sides of the device are the same (in which case it's bridging) or different (in which case it's routing). The addresses may be on physical interfaces, or they may be on virtual interfaces of some sort.

    If you're running PPPoA, your box is probably doing som e variation on bridging - taking your Layer 2 packets and shoving them over the PVC, which is a perfectly silly thing to do with an ATM connection. The alternative would be to terminate the Layer 2 connection and route the packets over the ATM PVC, saving a layer of protocol wrapper overhead and making the whole thing a lot simpler.

    [Lots of disclaimers about this being my own opinions, not AT&T's...] AT&T's business DSL service does routing. Some of the services are static address, some are dynamic address, and it's possible we've introduced something else recently that does bridging, but for a while it's been routing. (Cable modem is an entirely different game, and depending on your local distributor, it's often an ugly and stupid game as well....)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  372. I Love U!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sending to you a big hug and lot of kisses.
    Me =0)

  373. Not with Linux by sangretoro · · Score: 1

    Since I have Linux installed, they just set up the cable modem, never even turned the computer on. It was a brand new box, no OS, so after installing my version of Linux (about 15min) I was up and running on the net. No cable setup or special programs or anything. Just a clean install and started surfing.

  374. Read your Service Agreement by drhemi · · Score: 1
    My ISP is Shaw and this is from their service agreement


    "You agree to comply with the applicable terms and conditions of all end user license agreements accompanying any software or plug-ins to such software distributed in connection with Service."


    So by agreeing to the service agreement you've basically agreed to all the EULAs in any bundled software the installer puts on.
  375. You may have already agreed to the EULAs by drhemi · · Score: 1
    I use Shaw here as my ISP and their service agreement states this:


    "You agree to comply with the applicable terms and conditions of all end user license agreements accompanying any software or plug-ins to such software distributed in connection with Service."


  376. Wrong. by Fastball · · Score: 2
    inherent evil of capitalism

    I appreciate your idealism. I really do, but I'm not going to give you a free pass to call capitalism inherently evil. Capitalism goes a long way towards stimulating invention and progress. Broadband internet access is one such example. Yeah, the world could be better, but we aren't going to see it by growing dredlocks and setting the Space Needle on fire.

  377. Clueless cable guys by javert · · Score: 1

    Cable install guy sits in front of my computer with his enumerated step-by-step instruction sheet; I boot up the computer.

    It says: "LILO:"

    "Ahh, a password protected computer," says the knowledgeable install guy.

    "Um, no," I say, "I think I can set it up myself. Why don't you just leave the install CD with me?"

    "We're supposed to follo..." (hesitates as he watches my debian box boot up) "...Ehh, okay," he concedes, then spends the next hour sitting in his van smoking.

  378. Relax by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    such as a medium-sized business we recently switched over that had been running a T1 with public addresses on every desktop

    Big deal. The only justifiable reason for using NAT is saving money on address space. Treating it as a "security" measure does nothing other than give you a false sense of security. IT types that insist on using non-routable IPs for "security" reasons piss me off, particularly since I usually spend a ridiculous amount of time working around whatever idiotic restrictions they put in place.

    confidential filesharing servers (with public IPs) with IRC, RPC, NNTP, and thirty other services running

    This public IP hangup is crazy. And if they happen to be running all those services...so? Nothing inherently wrong, as long as they're aware of what they're doing. You can certainly run a secure system with a bunch of servers (though I probably wouldn't...). You might want to chroot a few things, but it's not the end of the world.

    and absolutely *zero* firewalling/security/etc.

    I'm going to be a bit unfair to you here and not give you the advantage of the doubt. By "zero firewalling/security/etc", what you *really* mean is "zero firewalling", right?

    Firewalls are the most oversold, least useful security technique on the market. IT types get off on them because they represent only a single system to poke at, instead of company-wide changes on each client. You can also get a great support contract with your firewall, so you don't have to know the first damn thing about networking, and still have a firewall.

    I *hate* firewalls. Stuff is exposed to the Internet for a reason -- because you want to access the damn service. If I want to put up an FTP server, I should be able to put up an ftp server. Nothing -- with the possible exception of transparent proxies -- is more annoying to the end user. Blocking outgoing DNS requests. Blocking outbound email. Blocking incoming ssh. Argh.

    You know what happens after you put your stupid firewall up? It gets VPNed by the first user who gets pissed off enough at you, everything gets tunneled through some port you left open, and you have the same degree of security that you did in the *first* place, but have a more complicated, fragile network.

    "The Internet treats censorship as damage and routes around it."

    They got replaced with a rackmount Mikrotik router system and were immediately firewalled, RFC 1918 standard private IP network, etc.

    So you made it a fricking pain for them to set up services to be accessed from the outside. No kidding, they were pissed off.

    Their response? Forget about thank you

    Surprise, surprise.

    no, they won't buy VPN software - think cheap

    Wow. I'd *hate* you if you were running my network. I have an SSH server that I use to grab files from to do occasional work at home. You take away my IP. I get upset, ask why it doesn't work, and you tell me to purchase some VPN software, because you're living high on your pet configuration? You expect users to be happy? Are you mad?

    can't run personal websites on desktops

    I don't have a problem with this at all. I'm running Apache on my desktop at this very minute. Blocking it would piss me off to no end.

    open relaying on their Exchange server was "broken"

    I think it's kind of sad that open relaying can't be used any more, and I've certainly been frusterated with mail admins before. I *do* think that no one should ever have a less lenient policy than:

    * local IPs get automatic relaying wherever
    * anyone that auths themselves via *any* (i.e. don't just support MD5 or something annoying like that) SMTP auth mechanism to be a valid local user gets relaying wherever
    * any remote IP can send to any local email addresses. I bitterly hate things like the DUL. I have a mail server on my computer. It's convenient, and I don't have to remember to change my "mail server" in all my mail clients when I move from place to place. The DUL is a ridiculously overagressive anti-spam measure, which basically makes life miserable for anyone who wants to run a simple, convenient mail server like this.

    "We don't want to know about those details. We just want it to work the way it did before without spending more money."

    And that's your job, pretty much. Make the functionality they need available to them with as little impact on them as possible. yours is a support role -- you should be keeping them purring along, never impacting work efficiency. If you have some brilliant scheme to improve security, fine, but make it convenient for them and make it *not* cut into any functionality that they're wanting to use.

    Users will insist on being stupid about IP, security, etc. (I only mention this because it is part of the mindset you need to understand to see where the service provider is going to come from).

    Yup. And network admins will insist on caring about their own "pet" security/network models over user convenience. Same thing always happens. If the guy's a Kerb fan, the network's going to be running Kerberos. If the guy is into SSH, telnet's going to be banned and everyone *will* use SSH. If the guy is operating under a "public IPs are bad" mindset, he's going to take away everyone's IPs.

    Come on... do you expect these folks to be experts about business policy? We train our guys to provide option A or B - A = installed our way, B = no install, goodbye and good luck. 90% of the customers are never an issue, but the 10% "I design websites, so therefore I'm a networking expert" types micromanage everything and work hard to screw it all up.

    Now *this* I like. A lot. I wish everyone had your good attitude here. Nothing pisses one off like a lack of your option B. Some ISPs think they *must* force everyone to undergo the installation procedure. Quite a turnoff.

    By loading this software, I ensure that my configuration will probably stay on top of all the nonsense you put in there, and I can actually have a clue what is going on when you manage to screw it up still.

    And of course, whatever shitty VB-programmer written crap is getting tossed into their system is probably immature and flaky, and probably has half-assed or *no* diagnostic features. I have a really low opinion of home-brew software from ISPs.

    1. Re:Relax by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      "And of course, whatever shitty VB-programmer written crap is getting tossed into their system is probably immature and flaky, and probably has half-assed or *no* diagnostic features. I have a really low opinion of home-brew software from ISPs."

      Care to point me in the direction of a company which produces software on time, and which works perfectly? I`m not trying to be sarcastic, just curious.

    2. Re:Relax by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      Okay, that's true. I'm not saying that I expect it to be perfect, though. Just not something thrown together by a half-assed programmer that all the users then have to suffer through.

  379. BIND Replacements by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

    > You mean, like these?

    Had heard of a couple of those. Most aren't replacements for BIND though. I counted:

    2 Written in JAVA. i.e. toys. Would never survive a real load without excessive hardware. (I.e. big ass Xeons like MCSE's put NT on)

    2 Packages still in beta

    3 stub DNS proxies intended for home LAN users

    And finally two more interesting entries. MyDNS was obviously aimed at large hosting farms with it's DB based backend and MaraDNS was actually kinda interesting. Have to read that site in more detail since it might actually qualify as a general purpose BIND replacement.

    > > and we both already know that so don't
    > > bother with beating that dead horse.

    > Such Style! Such Wit! Such Argument! Such
    > Rhetoric! Such Unquestionable Authority!

    Hmm. Looks like we do both agree djbdnd is NOT Open Source or Free Software. Obviously this does not bother you, but I will not use closed software when a viable Free equivelent is available. Neither is going to change the mind of the other so why are we beating this dead horse?

    > The Open Source community could use a few
    > more people like Dan.

    Why? Has he EVER released an Open Source or Free Software program? Until he does he is only slightly more useful than Microsoft/SUN/Oracle/J. Random Shareware author. He releases unfree software with licenses that allow free redistribution of unmodified copies. Hell, I could redistribute IE under those terms with only a small amount of hoop jumping. That doesn't make Microsoft a member of the Open Source community.

    You djb fanboys are almost as rabid as Amigans. Both of groups need to face reality. The Amiga is DEAD and djbdns will never see widespread use. Both failed in the marketplace due to self inflicted wounds. Nobody questions the technical
    quality of djbdns, but that still won't get it shipped in any OS because of the wierd non-free license is was released under.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:BIND Replacements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. Looks like we do both agree djbdnd is NOT Open Source or Free Software.


      It may not qualify according to RJS or ESR, but it's distributed in source form, without cost, and you're allowed to learn from the source code. My favorite email program was inspired by Qmail, and borrows much from Qmail's philosophy (if not directly from its code). Otherwise, I'd still be using Qmail.


      ...I could redistribute IE under those terms...


      Except that you didn't write IE, and the people who did write it wouldn't allow source distribution because it would uncover all its defects.



      Nobody questions the technical quality of djbdns...


      Precisely my point. It's a small, quality, reference implementation of what a DNS server should be. Unlike the hideous hulking giant that is BIND.


      ...but that still won't get it shipped in any OS because of the wierd non-free license is was released under.


      Just like the aforementioned IE won't get shipped in any OS, because of its weird, non-free license? At least Dan's software gets distributed because of technical excellence, not because of marketing muscle.

  380. Took em hours to do mine by Playboy3k · · Score: 0

    Check dis out im on a camp and i come home to find calbe installed it was kewl i knew that they had to redo it when i moved house but get dis my mum was saying the first guy turned up to install couldnt figure it out so he call his boss they come and 3 hours later its works now the funny thing was it was alreadys set up all they had to was plug it and it was also a win2k machine!

    --
    I'm a geek deal wit it
  381. Just ask what's really nessesary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here in SE WI, with Roadrunner, I've had it installed twice (moved once in there). The first time was a breeze, the guy was quite a geek, and we got to talking for almost an hour and he gave me all the "little extras" that a cable guy can do (and yes that did include free cable TV). Exchanged notes, and tweaked MTUs and such to make sure it was running 100%.

    After my move, things went halfway to hell. First, the billing dept fucked the hell out of my account, and so my "old account" got shut off a week before it should, and they signed me up with a new contract, WITHOUT transferring anything accross. And then, the install gets somehow delayed a month, and I'm sitting on no net access for that time.

    Anyways, the installer came by, and I showed him where everything was, (I had the cable already run from the drop, things hooked up and ready to go) and he took one look at my setup and flat out refused to install the service unless I disconnected my network. (which consists of 4 PCs spread around the house, guarded by a linux firewall... I just happened to use a linksys cable-router as a switch off that box -- nothing on the WAN port, but apparently he was trained to recgonize such devices -- "I'm not allowed to connect the modem to a router")

    At first, he *insisted* on connecting the cable modem directly to my workstation, which has a ton of open ports/shares/would be completely vulnerable to the net. At that point I refused him all access to the machine by locking it. (he was getting impatient and starting to change settings against my judgement)

    After which, he called his manager/supervisor, and went on how I'm refusing him to let him install, and ask if it's okay to leave (with all materials - cable modem) I said rather loudly that at no point did I refuse an install, but that installing with his method would not work, and would comprimise my PC in the process.

    In the end, he reluctantly agreed to install to my laptop, at which point I was at the helm, and telling him that it does indeed pull a valid DHCP address (which he didn't understand, untill I went through his script step by step.. the number was the same) then he packed up and left in a huff.

    So *usually* you can bypass the software installation, if you know exactly how to set up your PC beforehand, and can prove/convince the installer that the network is indeed active. All he wants from you is your signature on the contract, and not to get called in two days later from a complaint that he improperly installed a cablemodem. Some are just better about understanding "different" setups than others.

  382. Compuserve had the same problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I used to work as secondline support at compuserve and got escolated calls where customers would rant about how it was a free trial and they did not expect it to continue and we (compuserve) would take their money each month.
    I took great relish in pointing out to joe public on their high horse that THEY had agreed to the contract with the "I Agree" button.
    Until one day I did my "you clicked on.." speil to get in response "no i did not, the guy in the shop installed it all for me".
    hmmmmm, time to leave the country,

  383. Broadband Hookups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have had experience with 2 Cable Companies(Comcast and Knology) and two installations of Bellsouth DSL. In each case, the installation was done as a self-install. Both of the cable installers checked to insure that signal was present, then let me hook it up to my linux box. One BellSouth was a new installation. They sent the modem via UPS, we hooked it up to a router that supported PPPoE, and connected after one call when we found out that they required the full email address as login name. No problems with additional software at any of these.

  384. Re:Cogeco Cable by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

    I use Cogeco cable service in Ontario, Canada and they'll let you go without the software install or anything although they won't guarantee it'll work (standard disclaimer). Rogers, OTOH, also in the area, installs software that uses a modified Internet Explorer for Windows (glad I don't use Windows) which can't have the auto-proxy config removed easily.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  385. Idiots at the Gate by bjb · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This reminds me of when I got my @Home cable modem installed in 1998. I told @Home that I was running Windows NT, made sure that the operator knew that, and then scheduled my installation.

    Guy comes over, wants to install NIC (but I insisted that I do it myself), and then he turns on the computer waiting for the Plug and Play dialog on Windows. I told him there was no Plug and Play on Windows NT (and if you argue otherwise, yes there /is/, but you've never enabled it and found WHY it isn't enabled by default!). The installer had NO idea about ANYTHING with WinNT.

    Needless to say, he left without installing any software (thankfully, since I never installed Internet Explorer on that machine), but he had no idea of the network settings because he assumed DHCP would do all of it (another thing in NT that didn't quite work right in the early days of NT 4.0).

    My advice: if you know half your ass about computers, you probably know more about what you're doing than most of the people that install DSL or cable modems for residential consumers. Yes, there ARE smart people out there, but they're usually reserved for the customers that didn't get successful installations the first time around.

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  386. Use a scrap PC by AngusSF · · Score: 1

    Who cares? I actually set up an old box I had lying around with Win98 and no NIC and let him install a new NIC plus his software. After he left, I nuked the HDD and went back to my other stuff. This way I got the free NIC that they wouldn't have given me had I had a computer already NICked.

    --
    "A gun is a tool, Marian. No better, no worse than any other tool. An axe, a shovel, or anything." Shane (1953)
  387. Re:Have a honeypot - an old MAC by JLester · · Score: 2

    MacTCP supported BOOTP, but not DHCP, you didn't get it until OpenTransport came out. I know it well, we used to support several hundred of them :)

    Jason

    --
    "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
  388. Re:Have a honeypot - an old MAC by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    That's what I thought. I was pretty sure OT had it. Thanks for clearing that up.

  389. Freaked out my broadband installer by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
    Nothing better than the confused look on the face of your local "broadband installation expert" when they arrive to install new service and you show them to an otherwise empty room containing a PC (Gateway PC, keyboard, monitor, mouse), a phone jack, a power strip, and absolutely nothing else.

    Rather than risk a "real" machine that I actually use, and knowing that the pre-installation instructions requested a Windows machine as part of the new service requirement, I gave them exactly what they asked for.

    I did manage to convince the installer to leave the install CD, and I didn't find anything suspicious -- a copy of IETK configured for the provider's home page and search page and a cheesy freeware 'PING' utitilty.

    Five minutes after he left, the "Windows PC" was booting OpenBSD+PF+Squid...

  390. Re:Qwest doesn't get along with anyone except... by niall2 · · Score: 1

    Just FYI...the "small company" QWEST was dealing with was COVAD. Somehow I think they have some good attack dogs to make the ILECs do what they are supposed to.

    --
    Today is a gift. Save the receipt.
  391. Re:Qwest doesn't get along with anyone except... by symbolic · · Score: 2

    Hmmmm...Qwest lists a number of DSL "partners" in nt area, and they're all smaller ISPs, often with even higher prices than the bigger guys. Earthlink isn't mentioned. The sad part is that no matter which point of access I choose (non-cable), Qwest will be involved at some point.

  392. The Goober Pyle effect by jdeking1 · · Score: 1

    When the Comcast guy came to my house, I rebooted into Windows (dual-boot machine) and this red screen came up because Win98 always used to complain about my second hard drive (100% Linux ext2). So, Goober backed away from the computer and said he wouldn't touch it, I'd have to do my own install. Happy day! That's what I wanted anyway. His buddy verified that the cable was getting a good signal, they gave me a NIC and a line splitter (free of charge, I will grant them that) and hit the road.

    Unfortunately, 1) he didn't leave me all of the information I needed to connect properly, even with the crappy Excite@home software they had at the time - I had to call Tech Sub-port and have more paperwork and another CD mailed to me, and 2) the software he did give me hosed up Win98 so bad that even I couldn't fix it. And that's saying something.

    Their software hijacked Internet Explorer (but left Netscape alone, thank goodness), didn't get along with McAfee firewall (crash, crash, crash); every time I talked to Tech Sub-port they told me "we don't support Linux" - I always had to explain, "you don't need to. I do my own support. You just have to get the signal into and out of my house, and give me the IP address, DNS, etc. so I can connect." Like they expect us to call them for basic Windows and hardware support unrelated to their service?

    Now Win98 is completely gone from that box, and I have two other boxen on my home network (boxen and network are new since Comcast arrived in my life). Both the new boxen have WinXP and neither have even been in the same room as Comcast's install CD, nor have I used their "Member Support" option on their website - it will install all that crap too! Why? So they can remotely monitor your "problem" to give you a better crappy answer (and new, improved spam?).

    You don't need their software for anything at all, unless you have too much stability in your life and need excitement. Best bet: go to Radio Shack or CompUSA and buy the install kit. Install it yourself. Don't let Goober Pyle touch your computer. Ever.

    Let this inspire your confidence in the cable guy: one of them said to my buddy, as he had his hands inside his machine, "can you believe that two weeks ago I had never touched a computer?"

    --
    "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." -- Robert Heinlein