Slashdot Mirror


TiVo to Sell Your Fast-Forward Button

Thomas Hawk writes "PVRblog is reporting today that TiVo will begin to place banner advertisements on your screen when you are fast forwarding. As one of the whole points for people getting a TiVo is to remove obtrusive advertising, it seems like a really bad move to force advertising on people at the exact moment that they are using your technology to avoid advertising. This act points to the desperation of TiVo and their management team and although it might help them in the short run it will most certainly backfire in the long run." This is ironic for a company whose slogan used to be "TV Your Way," but not surprising, since its CEO says he wants to move to a largely advertiser-supported revenue stream. I've bought three TiVos in the past four years, but my next PVR will run MythTV -- unless HR2391 passes and makes me a criminal for skipping commercials.

777 comments

  1. I dont think its such a bad idea by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .... I mean, its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding, and "free tv" needs some sort of revenue.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but I have cable -- my TV is not free!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that the TIVO is NOT free. You paid for that device, and you paid for that service. Getting ads you don't want is a betrayal of the customer.

      Now if they wanted to provide a "free" version of the TIVO subscription that was advertiser supported, then I could see this working.

    3. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Sc00ter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you pay for cable you are not paying for the content on the TV (with the exception of premium channels) you are paying for the delivery of the channels.

    4. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by kb7oeb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thats not true, many of the channels charge the cable company per subscriber with ESPN and Disney being the most expensive

    5. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by MikeMacK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, people buy (or bought) TiVo's to avoid commercials. I don't think a business model that supplants their "own" commercials is going to work. Then again, I rarely watch TV anymore and then only PBS so I'm not really affected, unless they make it illegal to NOT watch TV. :-)

    6. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is this different than cable TV? You paid for the device (your television) and you paid for the service. They ram commercials down your throat just the same. If you don't like the terms, cancel your service.

    7. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by micromoog · · Score: 1
      You're not really looking at anything useful while you're using the restroom - why not let some company come in and install ads there?

      And when you're lying in bed, getting ready to go to sleep (or just waking up), there's a perfect blank space on your ceiling for some more ads.

      And if you're taking a walk in the woods, hey, you've seen one tree, you've seen 'em all, right? Ads!

      Just because a space is empty does NOT mean it's OK to put ads there.

    8. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well it depends. Will it be just a banner or will it have sound? Frankly I hate most commercials because they are just stupid. I have a suggestion to increase add revinue. Less ads. Do not show a block of four ads twice in an 30 minute show. Show only two 30 second spots in a 30 minute show AND charge more for them. I would be a lot less likly to surf to another channel or ff over one short ad than a two minute block of ads. Think of it like a magazine. I am more likly to see that full page ad than one of 6 ads cramed on a page. I will tend to skip over it. I might also be more likley to read a single 1/4 page ad in the middle of a page of text than a big block of ads.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The problem is that the TIVO is NOT free. You paid for that device, and you paid for that service. Getting ads you don't want is a betrayal of the customer.


      On an unrelated note, that's my bitch about classmates.com. When I was using their free service, I could understand banners and spam. I paid the bucks and subscribed, and aside from having the ability to actually contact people.. tada! Banners and even MORE spam.
    10. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, people buy (or bought) their TiVo to get to their desired content (ie the show) faster. If the time lag reduction remains the same, what's the damn problem?

      It's not the advertising itself, it's the time wasted with the advertising.

    11. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by hsteck_ylf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That would be lovely though, wouldn't it... we need someone to develope a cable service where we can just watch and pay for the shows we want to watch without having any commercials. too bad the business plan for that is a bad one :(

      --
      If you are expecting something here, I don't know what to tell you...
    12. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      The problem is that the TIVO is NOT free. You paid for that device, and you paid for that service. Getting ads you don't want is a betrayal of the customer.

      BS. If you don't like the product, don't buy it. Sounds like you no longer like the TiVo product. Don't buy it.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    13. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Kick+the+Donkey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I disagree. I think, most people, bought Tivo for its timeshifting and season pass features. Are commercials really so bad?

      You people need to get a life. The Networks generate their revenue off of sponsorship (read: commercials). Commercials are how the networks pay for all these shows you're watching! What don't you understand?

      You pay your cable bill to cover the delievery of those channels. Yes, some of the cable networks (ESPN, for one) charge cable companies to carry them. But that's a supply and demand issue. People want ESPN. They are willing to pay for it. How many cable companies have to pay for Food Network, or Spike TV? Not many, I'd say. If those channels weren't available, most people wouldn't have a problem with it.

      So, until you're ready to pony up the dough and pay for every channel like you pay for HBO, Showtime, and Pay-per-view, quit your bitching, and watch some freakin commercials.

      People don't make TV shows (for the most part) out of the goodness of their heart. They do it for profit.

      --
      /. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
    14. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not really. For Road Runner I am paying around $40 a month and I am pay $7.50 For Basic (not standard) cable. The $7.50 payes for the cable. the $40 for Road Runner pays for the cable (again) and the Internet Service. Standard cable which is around $30 give you some extra crap to watch. But it is all the stuff with comericals. Thus the $30 is almost all profit for them. Now comes to the issue that I don't know. Do the Statations pay the cable company to view there stuff or does the cable company pay the Stations to play there stuff. Now if the company pays the station then the station shouln't have as many comericals but they have more then normal broadcast TV. If the stations pay the Cable Company then why are we paying to get stations that they are already making money off of. It seems that in entertainment we get screwed both ways.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    15. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2

      You're missing the point. People already bought it for its ability to remove commercials. Now TIVO will change that, and a lot of TIVO customers will have no way of recovering the cost of that purchase.

    16. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      That's the same way I feel when I go to the movies and see a commercial before the feature. I paid money to see a movie once, and I resent paying to sit through commercials. As a result, I have started going to the movies less; yes it bothers me that much.

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    17. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      See, if they did that, then they would have to produce shows worth watching ... that ain't gonna happen.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    18. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      If you can't figure out why people are getting upset about a product they have already bought being changed to shove ads in their face your are either stupid or need to change your sig.

      This isn't the first time that Tivo has removed and/or changed features on customer purchased devices that didn't help the customer.

    19. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by lucason · · Score: 1

      Wake up.

      Fast forwaqrding shouldn't take more than a split second. What kind of ads are they gonna run during that split second?
      What's their solution? Simple, SLOW DOWN the FF. FFding will take a minute per 5 minutes in the first year (just a guess) until they figure out they can make even more money if the slow it down even more.

      Besides, when I'm fast forwarding I'd be watching the screen to see how far I've gotten.

      There's no way I'm gonna give up my MythTV Now. That's for sure.

    20. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      It would be a good business plan if the logistical/technological problems behind providing on-demand access to anything a viewer wants to watch could be solved. I think right now, after the distribution company took their cut to pay for the system to do it (and to make a profit comparable to what a cable company makes now), and the content provider took a cut to make the same profit they make from advertising, the cost-per-show would be high enough that no one would want to pay.

      The business doing this would have to be willing to take big losses to provide shows at a good price point, in order to build up enough volume to eventually make the system profitable. I don't really see many media industry compaies being willing to make short-term sacrifices like that in the near future.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    21. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I'll choose an alternate cable service...oh yah, there is no competitiion.

    22. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by stecoop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lets turn scenario in a way that benefits you:

      You're not really looking at anything useful while you're using the restroom - why not let some company come in and install ads there?
      Why not let the ads run on the TV while going for refreshment...

      And when you're lying in bed, getting ready to go to sleep (or just waking up), there's a perfect blank space on your ceiling for some more ads.
      Lets back load all adds from TIVO to certain hours of the day. My Tivo is never turned off but I turn off the TV and sleep. This is an optimal time for all commercials to run. Let the Tivo unit run commercials like a screen saver.

      And if you're taking a walk in the woods, hey, you've seen one tree, you've seen 'em all, right? Ads!
      Hmm I'm not sure where your going with this but if it's your land do with it as you legally please.

      Just because a space is empty does NOT mean it's OK to put ads there.
      Like I said try to twist everything to benefit you.

    23. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by dant · · Score: 1
      its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding

      Sure I am. I do that all the time--for example, to get back a point in that show where I left it when my roommate watched all the way through, so it's not set at the right place when I go back to it. Or to fast-forward through most of the football game to find the place where that questionable call was so my buddies and I can argue about it.

      So it really boils down to how big the popups are. If you can still easily see where you are in the program as you're zipping through it, then fine. But just like those @#&! channel logos and animated crawls networks have been putting accross the bottom of the screen the last several years, it seems obvious that the temptation to make them ever larger and more obnoxious will be very difficult to resist.

    24. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by wiredog · · Score: 1

      Most cable companies offer a basic basic service that is just the over-the-air channels.

    25. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      They already did that. That's how we ended up with ads on Cable TV. First Cable systems were commercial-free, I'm guessing you're too young to have witnessed that.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    26. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      How many cable companies have to pay for Food Network, or Spike TV? Not many, I'd say. If those channels weren't available, most people wouldn't have a problem with it.

      You can have my Emeril and ST:TNG reruns when you pry them from my cold dead hands!

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    27. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Fine, but can I not pay for the delivery of the Home Shopping Network, Telemundo, Catholic TV, and every other channel that I'm forced to take against my will?

    28. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 4, Informative

      Then why did my cable bill go up $3 a month when Steinbrenner's YES network was forced on me? It really irks this BoSox fan that part of my bill is paying Yankee salaries.

      --
      He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
    29. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Actually, most cable companies are required to do this as part of their monopoly agreement with your locality. Many cable companies make it VERY difficult to order this service.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    30. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      How would you feel about commercials interrupting an HBO movie?

      I rest my case.

    31. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but, I'm wondering if this 'new' advertising mode in the FF stage, will spell the end of the 30 second skip 'hack' you can do??

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    32. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      >If you don't like the terms, cancel your service.

      Sure, fine -- except I bought a "lifetime" subscription.

      I started out paying month to month, but once I realized what a major convenience TiVo was (letting me save time by skipping commercials and making it easier for me to record and watch what I wanted in the little time I do have), I paid out a lifetime subscription.

      Now, I don't think I'll have a problem with banners poping up as I forward through commercials (or 30-sec skip?) as long as it doesn't interfere with what I'm trying to watch. I don't mind the spots that it downloads now (I either ignore them or, like the Corvette & GMC ads, watch them).

      If it does interfere, I don't really have any recourse. I've bought (and modded) the machine and pre-paid for the service. I've invested and taken the risk that TiVo service is going to be around. If they go under, well that's part of the risk I took. If they change their service where it becomes irritating to have to see popup ads, I guess that's also part of the risk. If it becomes unusable because of intrusive ads*, that's something I never anticipated. :(

      *I don't think it will:

      ...TiVo has done its homework and knows its customer, Kent says. The new ads intrigue viewers instead of annoy them. They pop up and disappear in a matter of seconds if the viewer isn't interested. "You'll never see TiVo roll out any kind of intrusive advertising," Kent says. "It's very core to our mission."

      I sure hope that's the case.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    33. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think, most people, bought Tivo for its timeshifting and season pass features. Are commercials really so bad?

      It's just that they're chaning the deal. Original deal - We pay for the hardware and pay a subscription. New deal - We pay forthe hardware, we pay for a subscription and now they try to sell us stuff. We never agreed to that.

      You people need to get a life. The Networks generate their revenue off of sponsorship (read: commercials). Commercials are how the networks pay for all these shows you're watching! What don't you understand?

      That's all well and good. How does TiVO advertising help the networks? IT seems the profit goes to TiVO.

    34. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you're leasing your tivo, it's no different. If you paid for the tivo, you're suddenly left with a device which is useless without buying their service. (I'm talking about average consumers here, who would not deal with coming up with an alternate server, tweaking their tivo software, et cetera.) If the cable company forced you to buy a box (like Dish does) then you might have a point.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by arminw · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...ads you don't want is a betrayal of the customer...

      Many /.ers are probably to young to remember the days before cable tv existed. There was only broadcast over the air. At first, cable was touted to the consumer as a way to get commercial free tv and consistent high quality reception. It did not take long and there were lots of commercials on the "commercial free" cable channels. So now with Tivo it will be just a repeat performance of past history in a new technology.

      --
      All theory is gray
    36. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of ads are they gonna run during that split second?

      Blipverts.

      OMG! Max Headroom wasn't a drama, it was a documentary from the future!

    37. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Robber+Baron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Getting ads you don't want is a betrayal of the customer.

      Exactly. Somebody needs to whack these morons with a cluestick. If I've gone to the trouble to avoid watching advertisments, you ramming them down my throat anyway is going to endear me to your company and make me want to buy your products...how exactly? Personally I will actually go out of my way to avoid purchasing stuff because the advertisments have pissed me off.

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    38. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you are paying for the network channels as well. The cable company has to fork over some cash to them to carry their channel.

    39. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      You're missing the point. People already bought it for its ability to remove commercials. Now TIVO will change that, and a lot of TIVO customers will have no way of recovering the cost of that purchase.

      I'll bet there is something in the EULA about this. You should always READ a contract before you agree to it.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    40. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with Tivo?

    41. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Chris+Carollo · · Score: 1
      How is this different than cable TV?
      That's like complaining that there are ads on cnn.com because you've already paid Time Warner for your cable modem. With cable TV I'm paying for a delivery mechanism, not the content itself.
    42. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Roofus · · Score: 1

      Standard cable which is around $30 give you some extra crap to watch. But it is all the stuff with comericals. Thus the $30 is almost all profit for them.

      By "all profit", you are conveniently ignoring:

      1) The extra satellite dishes required to receive those channels from the providers
      2) The extra satellite recievers, demodulators, modulators required to process them
      3) The extra bandwidth required to transport them to your house
      4) The cost of purchasing amplifiers that have a broad enough frequency response to amplify them

      Yes, many of the required costs were paid out by the cable companies long ago, but don't they have the right to recoup their investments?

      As for your other question, Cable companies pay for each channel in their lineup. I think ESPN is reaching $2 per subscriber. That means $2 of your cable bill goes straight to ESPN/ABC/Disney.

    43. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by horrens · · Score: 2, Interesting

      here in estonia we already have this, a major broadband company is providing a service where you can watch shows and movies from the local tv stations, they will up your bandwith for the streaming and the charge will be added to your cable bill

    44. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      This isn't the first time that Tivo has removed and/or changed features on customer purchased devices that didn't help the customer.

      Than how is it a surprise? My guess is that this is all covered in the EULA (a contract). Guess you should READ contracts before you AGREE to them, then you will have all the information about the service you are paying for!

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    45. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Kick+the+Donkey · · Score: 0, Troll
      That's all well and good. How does TiVO advertising help the networks? IT seems the profit goes to TiVO.

      I haven't seen any proof, one way or the other, of who is exactly benifiting from this. I would imagine the Networks are getting a lions share of the revenue. Or maybe the networks will dicate which ads get placed, and Tivo just complies.

      New deal - We pay forthe hardware, we pay for a subscription and now they try to sell us stuff. We never agreed to that.

      Cry me a friggn river. Oh no! They're going to show me non-invasive ads that in no way impeed my use of the product! Help me! Help me! The sky is falling!

      --
      /. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
    46. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by cob666 · · Score: 1

      .... I mean, its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding

      Not True! When I'm fast forwarding during a commercial, I'm watching the screen so I know when the show starts again.
      If there are advertisements in the way and I can't tell when to stop forwarding -- THEN there's a problem.

      My $0.02

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    47. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      Huh? Aren't you supposed to see, you know.. fast-forwarded frames of what you're fast-forwarding through? I dunno about you, but when I FF through the god-awful intro to Enterprise I'm looking at it to see where to hit Play (even if I often wish I hadn't bothered.. damn addictions).

      Does the Tivo just blank the display or something so you're relying on the timer?

    48. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by hsteck_ylf · · Score: 1
      That would be an affirmative :P

      Anyway, who wants to join up and make our own cable system!

      P.S. to anyone who is excited about this, you can send money via paypal to...

      --
      If you are expecting something here, I don't know what to tell you...
    49. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      The cable company offers a package deal. You can take it or leave it. So, yes, you can not pay for that delivery by not having cable service. Easy, no?

      --
      -mkb
    50. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

      That's the risk you take with this type of service. Suppose you subscribe to XM radio. Today, the terms may be great. Tomrrow, they may change the terms in such a way that you don't want to keep the service. Cancel. Sure, you're left with a useless piece of hardware, but it was your choice to cancel. Sell it to somebody else, mod it, or use it as a coaster.

    51. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      The fuck I'm not, that's EXACTLY what I'm paying for!!

      If the cable company/networks/whatever wants to suppliment their income by adverts, that's none of my business. BUT, my contract is for said content.

      You're saying if I buy a hamburger, I'm not really paying for the cow, just the cooking process. No sir, don't think so.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    52. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm afraid I disagree with you. I have a TiVo, and the reason isn't so I can skip advertisements. Its a PVR, not a "fastforward through comercials for free" device. Sure, that's how many people view it, but that's not the purpose of it. Adding commercials doesn't betray the user, just annoys him. You had it good, but they aren't changing a fundamental point of TiVo... you can still record shows.. you can still save shows... you can still get season passes.

      Honestly, I'm all for it if it means they stay afloat longer.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    53. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

      Hmm. That's interesting. I wasn't aware that a lifetime subscription was available. As you said, seems to be a somewhat risky investment. You really do have no recourse.

    54. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by wibskey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      HBO is doing this. There are also cable companies that offer "on demand" services, that let you watch programs when you want, without commercials.

      While you're entitled to your opinion about what's "worth watching", there are millions of Americans willing to watch just about anything. The networks are still doing quite well with the quality of shows they are currently producing. Things are probably going to get worse before they get better.

    55. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by dissy · · Score: 1

      > I mean, its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding

      A little obvious maybe, but personally i'm watching the screen to know when I should press play to stop the fast forward process :P

    56. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen any proof, one way or the other, of who is exactly benifiting from this. I would imagine the Networks are getting a lions share of the revenue. Or maybe the networks will dicate which ads get placed, and Tivo just complies.

      Why would they do that? Out of the goodness of their hearts?

      Cry me a friggn river. Oh no! They're going to show me non-invasive ads that in no way impeed my use of the product! Help me! Help me! The sky is falling!

      Now you're being silly. No,the sky is not falling. No, it's not a disaster. It's simply thet they're showing a complete disregard for the feelings of their customers, which is bad PR.

    57. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Then you'd end up with a lot more "product placement" advertising in programming - probably a lot more blatant than it is now.

      It kind of reminds me of the Simpsons episode where Nixon and Kennedy were debating, and they took a time out for a commercial break and both endorsed Duff beer.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    58. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      .... I mean, its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding, and "free tv" needs some sort of revenue.

      Where's your IANATO (I am not a TiVo owner)?

      Any legal thread quickly over flows with 'IANAL', any discussion of IP brings out the folks who don't know copyright form trademark, so why should this thread be any different?

      Yes, I use TiVo to skip over commercials. I also use FF for shows I can watch without sound and faster than real time. Will the service know if I'm FF over a commercial or for some other purpose?

      For example I can watch a 3-hour football match in about half the time. I don't need the analyst's inane chatter, and I can always go back to regular speed to catch a big play.

      In addition, this 'feature' contradicts TiVo's own marketing. There's no sound while a show is in FF, but one of TiVo's tips is to turn on the closed captions and read the dialogue while watching the show faster.

      How is TiVo "free tv"? TiVo gives NOTHING for free. I've already paid for the hardware and paid for the service, and I didn't whine about it. This is TiVo unilaterally changing the terms of the deal after they have my money. Would you applaud nVidia if they decided to display banner ads on every computer with their graphics cards? Listen, nVidia needs to make money, right?

    59. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Matters not to me one way or the other. I quit watching T.V. years ago.

    60. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that oxygen thing - sooooooooo over-rated.

    61. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      A long time ago, TBS used to start shows at x:05 - so that when the first commercial breaks hit other stations, people could flip to TBS and get hooked into whatever show they were airing.

      I don't think that they do that anymore, but I always thought it was a neat trick to get viewers.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    62. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "You people need to get a life. The Networks generate their revenue off of sponsorship (read: commercials). Commercials are how the networks pay for all these shows you're watching! What don't you understand?"

      Exactly ... A lot of the stupidities of television can be easily be explained once you realise that the product is YOU, the viewer, and you are being sold to the advertisers, who are the real customers.

      These shows that play on TV are just 'unfortunate necessities' of doing business.

      Again I am reminded why I almost never watch TV and instead just play my DVDs with no commercials.

    63. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I watch BOTH of those channels a lot!

      Rachael Ray is hot, and MXC is hilarious. :P

    64. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Cry me a friggn river. Oh no! They're going to show me non-invasive ads that in no way impeed my use of the product! Help me! Help me! The sky is falling!

      Would it be OK if graphics card or monitor companies decided to show you non-invasive ads while you used your computer? Those companies need to make money too, right?.

      Of course you assume there is such a thing as a non-invasive ad. If it's non-invasive, that means I won't see it. If I see it, then it's invasive. So how are they going to show me ads I don't see? Perhaps they'll be subliminabable.

    65. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
      If you don't like the terms, cancel your service.

      Where's my refund for pre-paid lifetime service? If I don't like the terms, can I track down a TiVo executive and take $300 out of his hide?

    66. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are using broadcast TV, you aren't paying for the content either. The whole damn entertainment industry is screwed up due to greed...

    67. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The food network is the *only* channel I watch. They could just give me that one and forget the rest.

    68. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Yup $299:

      http://www.tivo.com/1.2.asp

      I got one of the Sony units early on and, after paying for the first couple months, got an offer on a lifetime sub that seemed like a really good deal at the time*. I think I paid like $200 (limited time offer, recommend a friend and if they sign up get a $100 off lifetime subscription -- my sister was ready to buy one).

      *and it was, I've already passed what I would have paid for monthly sub @12.95 x 24 months -- I think I'm well into the third year now.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    69. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Allow me to spell it out for you:

      You pay for cable to get a set of channels. You can pay a premium for channels that guarantee not to interrupt the programming with commercials (e.g. HBO, Cinemax, etc.)

      Similarly, people are paying a premium for TIVO services above and beyond regular TV service. One of the features they are paying for is to remove commercials from their programs. To forcefully add commercials back in is akin to HBO adding commercial breaks to their movies.

      Comprenda?

    70. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It really irks this BoSox fan that part of my bill is paying Yankee salaries.

      Someone has to pay the salaries of the players that play against your beloved BoSox. Else there would be no league, no games, and no reason for BoSox to exist.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    71. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by MaxPower2263 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're all missing the point. One of the pleasing features of TiVo is the ability to FF through commercials, should I want to do so. That's my right after buying the TV, buying the cable service, buying the Tivo and paying the monthly subscription cost. Just like I don't want popups on my computer, I don't want them on my TV. If TiVo follows through with this, they may lose me as a customer (which will be a very sad day for me).

      --
      -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
      MaxPower (2263)
      "I got it from a hair dryer."
    72. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by m3j00 · · Score: 0

      And I pay $50 a month for my cable, but there are still advertisements. Just because there's a single revenue stream from a product does not mean there can't be multiple ones.

    73. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by AdrainB · · Score: 1

      The first cable systems were not commercial free. They were created to provide television to people who lived in valleys and mountainous regions were there was no TV reception. There was also cable radio back in the day as well.

    74. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not really, since they're adding commercials in to the time that you spend fast-forwarding through the recorded commercials. It doesn't add commercials in the middle of some show that you're watching where there were none before.

      Again, if you don't like the service, don't subscribe. The same could be said of HBO; if they decided to change the terms and add commercials, then you'd always have the option to cancel.

    75. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by AdrainB · · Score: 1

      That's why I don't watch American Movie Classics anymore. They used to be commercial free. I only watch Turner Classics now.

    76. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by scribblej · · Score: 1

      I bought my girlfriend a TiVo last year for Christmas. It was the best omney I've ever spent on a home entertainment device.

      We paid for the "lifetime subscription" package. Now I regret it.

      If I buy another DVR it won't be a TiVo. Their technology is great, I can't complain about a single thing -- except what the company is doing. Fuckers. First they take away my ability to record sports and now it'll be my ability to skip commercials.

      I hope this hurts their pocketbook. I can't hurt 'em where it counts 'cause I've already paid FOR LIFE. Boy, was that dumb.

    77. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that somewhere in the contract for your lifetime service they say that they're free to change the terms at any time. I guess that's the risk you take with such a deal.

    78. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mbadolato · · Score: 1

      I don't care some much about the avoiding the commercials, as much as I care about being able to get past the few minutes that aren't the show. I don't like being forced to break up the show.

      With TiVo, I record, and when I watch I forward past the commercials so that I can continue watching. Granted I hate commercials but they don't bother me so much when watching Live. I just hate having to wait to continue with the show.

    79. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by prescot6 · · Score: 1

      When you're skipping commercials on TiVo, you're basicall just watching the normal commecials wiz by really quickly, right? So let's say that in addition to that a banner ad shows up on the top and bottom (kind of like letterbox, but with ads instead of black bars). You're still going to be watching the action fast-forward by until your show comes back on, at which point you return to normal play mode and the ads go away.

      The only inconvenience I see this causing is missing your cue because you're paying attention to an ad. But even then, big deal. You lost 10 seconds to rewind again. You still save the time skipped by the commercials. I don't think it's the advertisements as much as the time that they absorb during the show anyway.

    80. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Then it would be impossible to ever buy products that require a service to be up and running for them to work, like cable-ready TV's, or satellite radios, or an online RPG game, or a cable modem. All the services that those products are used with come with a disclaimer saying the provider reserves the right to change the terms of service at a later date without asking first, and that little clause is ALL that is legally required to make changes like the kind TIVO is making. In other words, there is no such thing as a service provider that you can be guaranteed will continue to provide the same service tomorrow they are providing today. You are acting like there is an alternative to switch to. There isn't. The only alternative is to never use any new technology and remain stuck in the 1980's.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    81. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Before giving up, I'd be trying to change their minds about it, too. I don't want my investment to be wasted and I don't want to have to go looking for an alternative. Not to mention, it's not right to pull that kind of bait-and-switch shit on your customers, and in some cases it's illegal.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    82. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you can't figure out how the EULAs that have become ubiquitous recently differ from actual real contracts, then you are either in your teens or 20's, or stupid.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    83. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by dbc001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stop worrying. Grass-roots produced, bittorrent-distributed, creative commons licensed media will replace TV eventually. I have several friends who do pro-level video that have projects in the works. They will be free. If you don't believe me, check the new Wired magazine - Beastie Boys are putting out Creative Commons licensed tunes. Old school media conglomerates will wither and die. But we have to stop supporting them first.

    84. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Sebby · · Score: 1

      When you pay for cable you are not paying for the content on the TV (with the exception of premium channels) you are paying for the delivery of the channels.

      I don't buy that argument.

      Look at radio: do I have to pay for it? No. The stations pay for the delivery. The more they increase their range of delivery, then the more they can easily sell airtime to advertisers ("see, we have 20% more range/listners that [other station]"). I don't see why this shouldn't be the same with cable tv. Cable TV is definitively not free.

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    85. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.

      And a state lottery is a tax you pay for being bad at math.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    86. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Would Spock Do?

      I dunno, but I know he wouldn't dance.

    87. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Cromac · · Score: 1
      My guess is that this is all covered in the EULA (a contract).

      You keep saying this over and over in replies, why don't you go research it and back up your opinion with some fact instead of repeating your empty, worthless "guess"?

    88. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      My issue is the ambiguity in the article. If the new banners are tied to commercials, I have no problem with TiVo showing ads over the existing ads.

      However, if the new banners are tied to the FF function, that will be a big problem. I use FF for things other than skipping over commercials.

    89. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that a lot of that revenue is shared. The good teams that are right now spent that money on free agents. The crappy teams with good farm systems spent that money on the farm system.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    90. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cable companies aren't as bad as the satellite companies. They bombard my home and property with radiation 24 hours a day 7 days a week yet charge me for looking at it, and have made it illegal for me to do anything with it without giving them money.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    91. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Slime-dogg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm... no.

      Tivo doesn't make my reception any faster. That sounds very much like the Intel marketing that the Pentium 4 made the internet faster.

      Tivo lets me record a number of shows when I can't watch them, so that I may watch them later. Tivo also provides a service of providing my hardware with up-to-date listings, as well as recording shows that I might like to fill up the space that I don't use.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    92. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Let me tell you why this will not work. As the push towards PVR becomes greater, advertisers will start to advertise with tivo as well as on tv. They'll think "well, they can't get away from us now!". Tivo then thinks, "great! we'll get some serious ad revenue now"

      However the customers will think "so wait, I bought this thing to avoid the commercials, and now the people are putting those same commercials in when I'm fast forwarding. I don't want this, who oh who will come along and provide a pay service that acts as tivo used to?"

      And then someone will come along and provide the service tivo used to, and tivo will die. I personally would love to see mythTV replace it in the mainstream, and this shotgun-to-foot action by tivo management is exactly the thing that will bring this about.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    93. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Kick+the+Donkey · · Score: 1
      Old school media conglomerates will wither and die.

      I'd love to see that happen, but I have my doubts. People are like trained monkies. If it doesn't come from some big company, they don't like it.

      Maybe a partial explaination of Wal-Mart.

      --
      /. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
    94. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uhh, they do. Every time I boot my system I get a Tyan motherboard advertisement, an AMD advertisement, then a quick Nvidia advertisement (actually I was able to turn this off with the NoLogo option), as it boots I get a grub advertisement, then a Linux kernel advertisement. Once I log in there is a big Debian advertisement. Hell sitting her at work there is a big DELL advertisement just below the screen on my monitor and another in the upper left section of my keyboard and another on my mouse. Even my stapler has a big Swingline written in a nice cursive font across the top. Sure these are non intrusive. During boot and Post it almost looks like it is part of what needs to be done.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    95. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by boog3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and watch some freakin commercials

      Just like I dislike commercials, I also dislike your opinion of commercials. I DO NOT want to watch them, and I am willing to pay not to have to.

      Just because you are accustomed to the subconscious gang-bang that is modern advertising culture, I will not condone my subjugation at the hands of your corporate masters.

      Our rights are abstract and fleeting, easily stolen when we lapse in fortitude and much costlier to regain than to sustain. Your willingness to give up yours not only drags the rest of us down with you, but makes it harder for others to support you in the future.

      I am not saying that Tivo is stripping our rights, I am saying that Tivo engendered a certain pioneering vision in the masses' fight that is now becoming corrupted. While this is not surpising, Tivo is corporate and is beholden to higher powers, it is another distressing example of the corporate advertising influence in society.

      I think advertising is the worst and most prevalent drug in our society and that people fail to realize the impact it has on their subconscious. Mass market advertising contributes to the mental enslavement of the world to corporate society.

      --
      signatures are for fools with hands
    96. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      I thought he was talking about the Lifetime network... I was thinking, thats not somthing I'd brag about.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    97. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Roark+Meets+Dent · · Score: 1

      NO, it's like complaining because Time Warner cable internet service forces its OWN ads on your screen on top of everything else.

    98. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Yea, this seems much better than the fear I have of banner ads during the show. I have noticed this on several stations already mostly to advertise other shows. But things like discovery and scifi both while watching a show there will be some distracting advertisement run across the bottom of the screen for another show coming on later. How long before this is used for product and service advertisements?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    99. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I think his point was it should not be forced to do so simply for the right to have cable TV.

    100. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      What flamebait. First off, I'd love to see some cold hard numbers to support your assumption that most people bought tivo for the timeshifting and season pass features. If you can't back it up with numbers, don't make such a broad assumption.

      Commercials aren't that bad, but I'm in advertising/marketing so I may be a bit biased. That being said, I would NEVER suggest to a client that they run one of these tivo ads because in the end, it pisses off the viewer. If they payed for a product/service to escape one thing, and that very thing is now being forced on them, that is fucking ridiculous and if you can't see that and understand why people are upset about it, you need to crawl back under whatever rock you trolls spew forth from.

      It is not your place to decide whether or not people should have an issue with ads being forced on them. It is up to them, and as the other posts here have shown, there are quite a few people who are very upset about this, and that's just on Slashdot.

      You a very right though that this is a supply and demand issue. People are demanding no commercials, and tivo used to supply a way to meet that demand. But they're not doing it now, so whoever can, will get the money of those demanding it. It may take some time, but I feel ultimately people will decide to vote with their money and show tivo the error of their ways.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    101. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by RangerRick98 · · Score: 1

      I didn't have any problems ordering it with Comcast, but since I was also setting up cable Internet access, maybe they were a little more understanding about the TV side of things.

      --
      "You're older than you've ever been, and now you're even older."
    102. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Armando_Mcgillicutty · · Score: 1
      Tivo doesn't make my reception any faster.

      It does mine... I watch some hour long shows sometimes in 15 minutes (but usually 30 or 45) because I can skip through all the crap I don't want, and just see the part I'm interested in.

    103. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by stanmann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Time warner aka Roadrunner made it fairly easy as well calling it "antenna+ service" or something similar, However Cableone where I currently live has "basic service" for $45+ and when you ask for the minimum service, they don't know what you are talking about, their program is called "lifeline" and if you don't ask for it by name, the phone support employees play dumb.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    104. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by pftpft · · Score: 0

      Sporting events and movies aren't free either. But you don't see them having a problem forcing ads on you once you get there. By your thinking, I should get to see the Texas Rangers for free since I have to look at the Tom Thumb and Target billboards on the homerun fence. I'm not saying what they do is okay - it sucks. But, ads are the American way.

      ps. a while back my ReplayTV showed ads when you paused viewing, then they got rid of it when enough people complained. Nothing like unhappy customers to help change your ways.

    105. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've had my Tivo for years now and haven't signed a single contract with Tivo. Guess I'm one who can complain about this.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    106. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      I've heard that TiVo defines "lifetime" as "the lifetime of the TiVo device". If so, it won't be such a waste when you replace your dead TiVo.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    107. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > I paid out a lifetime subscription.
      > If it does interfere, I don't really have any recourse.

      Wow, thanks for the warning. I was thinking about buying a Tivo this year, but I hate the idea of yet another annual subscription. So, I was thinking about buying the unit lifetime subscription.

      It didn't occur to me that if I did so, Tivo could change their terms at any time, and I would be stuck. I'm not convinced that Tivo won't change the service to make me not like it.

      I know plenty of people who love their Tivo (or ReplayTV), but it starting to feel like a deal with the devil -- it's great at first, but then you're hooked.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    108. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Hence the term "Community Antenna Television", or CATV.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    109. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      The ONLY reason this would get my panties in a bunch would be if the ads interfer with my fast forward timing. I have gotten rather good at identiying the end of the comercials and hitting play perfectly to get back to the show without having to rewind/fastforward more etc...

      Otherwise ad away Tivo!

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    110. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by sucati · · Score: 1

      Here's little tidbit for all of you considering this service. You may be able to get free service via a HDTV tuner - and you don't need to have a HDTV to view it. Actually the vast majority of programming is not in HD, yet it is still digital and better picture quality than my Directv. I use a small indoor antenna to get reception (Zenith Silver Sensor).

    111. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by wibskey · · Score: 1

      Jonathan , is that you?

    112. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

      Tivo does not tag commercials, that i know of. Replay TV tried to, from fadeouts, etc. But TiVo would have to write new code for that. I'm afraid... that they just might be tagging it to teh FF button. You're right, that would suck.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    113. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

      I'd love to hear the business model behind that. Or is it just a diving platform to get hired somewhere?

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    114. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're so cool!

    115. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      You have to look a level higher. In other words, "I'll choose an alternative form of entertainment".

      Books, DVD box sets of tv shows, DVD movies, theatre, computer games, League sports, poker night, bars, strip clubs, biking, skiing, board games, roleplaying, programming, 2nd job... whatever.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    116. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by bitflip · · Score: 1

      No one I asked (an informal survey of three, plus myself) uses their PVRs to "remove" commercials. The top response is time-shifting without the hassles of video tapes.

      The only factor "commercials" have in it is saving the time not watching them (as many other posts have mentioned). Banner ads will have no effect on this.

      Sure, maybe removing commercials is one of your favorite features, but you can always cancel the service. Or, you can go back to the dark ages, and just not pay attention to them.

    117. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not really, since they're adding commercials in to the time that you spend fast-forwarding through the recorded commercials.


      Are you just dense? One of the selling points is to NEGATE commercials via fast-forward.. not add "other commercials of lesser length."

      You're a lawyer, aren't you...
    118. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

      The problem is that a TiVo doesn't know what's commercials and what's the real broadcast. So it's not like you'll only see a banner ad when you fastforward through commercials; you'll see it *any time* you fastforward. Meaning, say, if you want to fastforward through a football game to see the highlights, you'll have a banner ad blocking part of the screen while you do so.

      *Unless*, of course, TiVo finds some way to reliably distinguish commercials from the actual program you're watching. That would be *terrific*. Imagine if the TiVo could automatically go into fast-forward mode when it saw a commercial break starting, and come back out into Play mode when it saw the show coming back on. If my TiVo could do this, it would be worth seeing a banner ad.

      (Yes, it would be even nicer if the TiVo could automatically jump across commercials in the first place - but I don't think you'll ever see this happening.)

      What I find most interesting about this whole thing is that it's going to amount to blocking one ad with another. Wasn't there some software that got in trouble for doing that, a few years ago? Where if you browsed to a web page with a Toyota ad on it, the software would hide that ad and show you a Ford ad instead?

    119. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How many cable companies have to pay for Food Network, or Spike TV?"

      Unless I am mistaken, all of them that carry these channels. Cable companies can't just carry a channel for free. In some cases, such as home shopping and many religious channels, the channel originator does not charge a fee, but most channels do cost the cable company money.

    120. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by SoCalChris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Again, if you don't like the service, don't subscribe. The same could be said of HBO; if they decided to change the terms and add commercials, then you'd always have the option to cancel.

      Except I didn't have to spend $300 up front for HBO, on top of their monthly subscription. If I cancel HBO, I'm not losing anything. If I cancel the TiVo service, that $300 box just became a big paperweight.

    121. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Actually, the cable companies pay for just about every channel (often pretty minimal amounts), with the exception of:

      1. broadcast channels (long story on this one, suffice to say that they don't pay)
      2. home shopping (QVC and HSN pay _them_)

      Some of the channels are pretty minimal amounts ($0.10 per subscriber per month), but some are very pricey: ESPN is >$2 per sub per month.

    122. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by diabolo-nerd · · Score: 1

      You do not seem to get that this idea goes against the whole principle of the tivo!!

      --
      "there is nothing to fear but fear itself"- Franklin Delano Roosevelt
    123. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by dbc001 · · Score: 1

      Who says there has to be a business model? If you are an artist, you can either waste your life trying to become a rock star, or you can give your work away. Of course, a successful free project could easily lead to paid gigs.

    124. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Noginbump · · Score: 1

      Those are product names. How would you like it if cans of Mt. Dew were blank? You could buy a Pepsi or whatever.

      Now if your computer showed a Mt. Dew ad when you booted it up...

      --
      He who questions training, only trains himself at asking questions. -- The Sphinx, Mystery Men
    125. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this insightful?

      Is it not clear that a banner add showing while you're fast-forwarding (not watching anything useful on the screen) is different from an ad popping up while you're using your computer?

      Crikes, you guys are fucking crybabies.

    126. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by redrhino · · Score: 1
      I get the sense that many of you all are more than a bit quick to jump all over TiVo for something that they've not done and say that they're not going to do.

      See comments made by one of their company representatives over in the TiVo community discussion

      All the best...

      Steve

    127. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by spectecjr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stop worrying. Grass-roots produced, bittorrent-distributed, creative commons licensed media will replace TV eventually. I have several friends who do pro-level video that have projects in the works. They will be free. If you don't believe me, check the new Wired magazine - Beastie Boys are putting out Creative Commons licensed tunes. Old school media conglomerates will wither and die. But we have to stop supporting them first.


      This was moderated insightful?

      Pro-level video projects cost money. You can't film everything on location. You can't get all locations for free. You have to pay actors and skilled crewmembers - after all, this is their DAY JOB. Not everyone works for free.

      This will be a small and tiny niche. It will not grow - because creating media costs more than the cost of a camera and a microphone.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    128. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by rpdillon · · Score: 1

      I really have to disagree.

      - You pay monthly subscription for the cable service.

      - You pay monthly subscription for the internet access to setup the Tivo.

      - You pay for the Tivo itself, probably getting a new one every 3 years or so (that's what Tivo says life expectancy is, anyway).

      - You pay subscription for any premium channels per month.

      - You pay monthly subscription for the Tivo service.

      And now you say, after all that, I'm supposed to lie down and pay with my time watching commercials as well?

      I don't think so. At some point you have to say "Hey, I have paid enough. Now I should get to watch the programs I paid for, not advertising."

      I'm at that point. You spend so much for all the services (easily over $100 a month for internet+ cable + tivo + special subscription channels + amortized Tivo + amortized TV) that it starts making a huge dent in people's finances.

      Also, from the sounds of it, this would end up effectively inserting commercials onto premium channels if you ever wanted to fast-forward HBO's between-the-movies-previews crap. Its easy to say each thing isn't that much worse than the thing before it, but you have to see the overall trend, and draw the line somewhere.

    129. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by bob_herrick · · Score: 1

      The trade-off is 5 minutes of commercials vs 30 seconds on fast fast fast forwarding. I have no problem. Besides, how long will it be before the pop-up blocker arrives?

    130. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Not really, since they're adding commercials in to the time that you spend fast-forwarding through the recorded commercials.
      This whole concept is nonsense; if a Tivo is anythink like my homebrew PVR, fast-forwarding doesn't take any time in the first place! It's like proposing to show commercials while your TV channel is changing, it doesn't take any appreciable time in the first place.
      Again, if you don't like the service, don't subscribe.
      This argument is irrelevant for people who already bought lifetime service (and others have already pointed this out repeatedly).

      Personally I don't own a Tivo anyhow. I'm just here to watch the train wreck.

    131. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by earlytime · · Score: 1

      agreed,

      Agreed. But, I do think they have every right to adjust their prodict to bring in more revenue.... But I think if they introduce this "feature" it should be only on new tivo's, and not on a tivo already bought and activated. otherwise there'a bait and switch effect happening, which is a problem. They could certainly have an opt-in coupon. i.e. Get a $50 rebate if you agree to see the ff ads.

      OTOH, if tivo goes under we are all screwed, and not just because my tivo stock would be worthless. Tivo is an innovator in their market (they created it), and if they leave, comcast, directv, and scientific atlanta are left to steer the ship. whe's the last time you saw them do something innovative? They are just now responding to tivo, not because they want to offer better service to their customers, but because they realize that a net connected tivo could undermine their whole business model.

      Think about a show that doesn't exist on broadcast tv or cable, but is delivered over the net to tivo's. The distributor would save millions in fees by circumventing the big networks and the cable. It would be like ebay for tv. no more shows canceled by network execs, if the subscription base stays high enough, the show stays on, and you can watch it whenever you want.

      --

    132. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by zymurgyboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wish they'd give my $2 back and take it from some willing ESPN subscriber. It really irks me as a broadband Internet fan that part of my bill is paying for the continuation of pointless sporting events.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    133. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Then again, I rarely watch TV anymore and then only PBS so I'm not really affected, unless they make it illegal to NOT watch TV."

      I expect sooner or later, your TV will turn itself on every time there's an amber alert, a weather warning, or a specially-tagged advert...

    134. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding

      Not so.

      I'm looking very carefully to see when to stop the fast forwarding to resume the show without overrunning the commercial break.

      Consequently, during the fast forward operation I already am paying a lot of attention to the albeit choppy 20x ad-stream. That's enough mental penetration for me to tolerate from the advertisement.

      If this is implemented it will significantly decrease the value of my TiVo to me. My enthusiastic recommendations of TiVo to friends, family and coworkers will cease, and I won't purchase an HD TiVo.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    135. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Zebidiah · · Score: 1
      Exactly ... A lot of the stupidities of television can be easily be explained once you realise that the product is YOU, the viewer, and you are being sold to the advertisers, who are the real customers.

      One of the more insightful comments on Slashdot!

    136. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You people need to get a life. The Networks generate their revenue off of sponsorship (read: commercials). Commercials are how the networks pay for all these shows you're watching! What don't you understand?
      The Tarzan version: Me buy Tivo. Me pay Tivo. Tivo not network. Network business model separate from me and Tivo relationship, and not my problem.

      If the network goes under because people don't watch their ads . . . tough tootie. I'd be happy to pay for the one to three shows I watch every week, and if the vast sea of reality TV, sports, gameshows, and soap operas sinks beneath the waves it will only be good for the country and the world. Many of these so-called "actors," "writers," and other "talent" should be competing as baristas and shoe-store clerks anyway.

      As for getting a life, I can't think of much of a crusade to get people to watch commericals so the poor networks can make their nut. I mean, UNICEF can always use some help. Wouldn't your leverage be more helpful there?

    137. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by afidel · · Score: 1

      Ah, cable companies pay for almost EVERY channel they carry, including broadcast! Many of them come in bundles for the distributor so the cable company (like their customers) is forced to take the bad crap with the channels that they actually want, including a raise in fees when another channel is added to the bundle. That's why most of us don't like ads, we end up paying for the ads anyways through increased branding costs, we'd rather just pay for cable what it costs. What I'd really like is to have a free market with al a carte pricing and a delivery cost like I have with my water and gas bills, but that's just dreaming. If that were reality then stupid crap like Oxygen would die off if their production costs were higher than their limited audience was willing to pay, no law says that we have to have 500 channels of crap subsidised by hidden costs on the general economy.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    138. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Now if your computer showed a Mt. Dew ad when you booted it up..

      I'd ignor it all the same. I don't see the difference?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    139. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A-la Carte would rock my world. We only watch 10 - 15 channels, I'd gladly slash my current bill by 90%.

    140. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by calbanese · · Score: 1

      Yet you took the time to come in here, read the comments, and add nothing to the conversation. Kudos to you, superior non-watching TV man!

    141. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

      "Who says there has to be a business model? " The parent did, when he said that the Grass-roots produced, bittorrent-distributed, creative commons licensed media will replace TV eventually. I don't see that happening unless money is involved.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    142. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by balloonpup · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but I fast forward for more reasons than just skipping commercials. So in addition to adding ads to the ads, they're also adding ads to just general scanning of a program.

      As to the 'don't like it, don't subscribe', sure, that makes sense if you haven't bought a Tivo yet, but given the price for a Tivo (I paid $200 for mine), it goes a bit beyond that. In all honesty, I wouldn't have bought mine if I had known they were going to do this. It's been long enough that I can just eat the price, but if I had just bought one new, I'd be mighty pissed.

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    143. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hell sitting her[sic] at work there is a big DELL advertisement just below the screen on my monitor and another in the upper left section of my keyboard and another on my mouse.

      Uhh, that's called branding, not advertising. I don't think Tivo will just be putting up the Tivo logo, right?

      Think about it for a minute - is Dell Paying themself for the placement of the Dell Logo on a Dell product?

      No. They're not. Because that's branding of their own product.

      But if your Dell Computer had a Coke logo on the front of it, well, that's advertising.

      Get it now?

    144. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by DannyO152 · · Score: 1

      I'm 47 and getting older. The networks' (and advertisers') interest in my eyeballs watching their stuff is fading. Soon I'll be part of the proof that a programming president should be fired, as a network's demographics are skewed too old.

      And you know what? Armed with a remote and the ability to leave the couch, I skip over a good portion of their commercials any way. As befits my age, I guess I "steal" broadcast programming old school.

    145. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by micromoog · · Score: 1

      I've started going less because there's always some asshole chewing popcorn with his mouth open right in my ear. But I digress.

    146. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding, and "free tv" needs some sort of revenue.

      This is wrong on so many levels.

      First off, "free tv" is not getting any revenue from this. TiVo is getting the revenue. Tivo is selling ads on your fast forward screen. The ad could be for something unrelated to the television ad you are skipping over.

      Second, I don't want to be looking at an ad while I fast forward. Why am I supposed to like this? Why are you trying to convince me that this is somehow a good thing? What would be really good is if TiVo would put up a black screen or black out the underlying tv commercial during the fast forwarding. Just skip ahead 30 seconds already, instantly, and without showing me what I skipped. And don't show me your own ads in the process.

      Then there is the "useful" part of your argument. It is useful for me to be able to rest my brain while fast forwarding. Not seeing a commercial. That is useful.

      Then there is the "free tv needs some sort of revenue." They get revenue. By running ads. That doesn't mean I have to look at the ads. I bought a Tivo to skip the ads, plus other conveniences. If this business model does not work for them, then it is not my fault that they have a broken business model. I have the right to watch what I want. I want the content. I don't want the ads. They can try to make me see ads, and it is within my rights to try to not see them. If Tivo is trying to force upon me that which I don't want, it will only hurt themselves in the long run. I will be looking for ways to subvert their ads, just like Tivo was the way to subvert the broadcasters' ads.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    147. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 1

      You, and a great many others, say you are paying for the content but not the commercials. Seems to me that part of the content that you're paying for is the commercials. You know this when you sign up. If you don't like it, then uplug and go with what's floating on the airwaves in your locale.
      One solution would be to have an a la carte menu of cable channels, each with their own price, and the consumer would get to purchase exactly what he or she wants. Another might be to charge for actual usage.

      (tig)

      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    148. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Daytona955i · · Score: 1

      I would love to pay for *just the channels I watch*. I could care less about ESPN, EWTN, The Gameshow network, and pretty much most of the rest of the channels. I would get:
      Fox (the simpsons), Comedy channel, AMC, FoodTV, The Discovery channel and the History Channel. So instead of raping me for 100 channels I don't want to watch, charge me the $20/month for the 10 channel package which as you can see, would be more than enough. However now that I'm paying for them take out the commercials. Not gonna happen, instead they'll still rape me for all the channels I don't want and then thow ads at me that I have to watch because it's now law.

      Heck I'd even be happy if I had a pay-per-view for TV. (providing it was reasonably priced) You might actually see people get off their ass and go outside once in a while.

    149. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand. I certainly agree that I pay for content with commercials and as such I'm free to do what I want with them, including refusing to watch them, removing them, skipping them, what have you.

      The parent was arguing that paying for cable is NOT paying for content, which I disagree with.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    150. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      Dude, replace that Linux install with Windows. I just have one big, blue, indeterminate ad.

    151. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by PenchantToLurk · · Score: 1

      The fact of the matter is that Tivo isn't making that much money, and is losing market share to new competitors, not to mention fighting an uphill battle with networks, ired by the service.

      While I'm sure there's something in the TOS that allows them to do this to their subscribers (myself among them, though I'm building an htpc as we speak), the isn't a great way to innovate themselves out of the pit they're in. The home media toolset they have is innovative, as is the website scheduling. Not because they invented it, it was hacked into Tivo long before, but because they chose to expand consumer choice, and the capability of their offering.

      My guess is that either they're going to do this with a partial kick-back to networks as pennance for their commercial skip sins OR they're trying to position themselves as advertiser-friendly as a means to demonstrate growth potential.

      Further, they could be getting themselves into hot water with advertisers, particularly if they try to be 'smart' about ad placement (Home depot in a home improvement show, especially one sponsored by Lowes). Gator and Netscape both have/are in trouble for this: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/business/0,39020645,391191 32,00.htm

    152. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Stop worrying. Grass-roots produced, bittorrent-distributed, creative commons licensed media will replace TV eventually. I have several friends who do pro-level video that have projects in the works. They will be free. If you don't believe me, check the new Wired magazine - Beastie Boys are putting out Creative Commons licensed tunes. Old school media conglomerates will wither and die. But we have to stop supporting them first.

      I was thinking about this the other day. And torrents would be ideal for non-mainstream user-supported media under a liberal license.

      Take South Park for example. I would have no problem paying $10 a year for a subscription to get the torrents of SP as soon as they are available. Thats $10 for a typical season which is 7 episodes. Now, if only 1 million people do this too, that would be $10,000,000 of revenue for Matt and Trey to create their episodes and have a torrent tracker and an upload pipe or two. These episodes will also be freely available to anyone after the initial release. People only pay to "get it first" which people seem to be willing to do.

      Now, if it costs much more than $10 mil to produce 7*20 or 140 minutes of animation, then the figures will have to be adjusted. But you get my point.

    153. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by farble1670 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the types of advertising that tivo is inserting are VERY different than a TV commercial. a TV commcercial forces me to sit there (or go away) for an amount of time that i do not control. if tivo inserts a banner when i am ff'ing, who cares? they are not causing me to spend any longer to ff through commercials, right? i am in complete control of when i stop ff'ing and therefore stop viewing their add.

      while i think we all find tv commercials annoying, i would say that the primary issue is not the content, but the delay in programming. ya ya the content is offensive and degrading, but that's the price of living in a society such as ours, so get used to it. tivo is not causing any delay in programming. i'm okay with that. compare this to web page advertising. while it might add minimal time to your browsing, in general it is palpable. if you want to make a comparison to tv commercials, that would be like if the browser locked me into an advertising-only page for a fixed amount of time. i think most folks would fine that unacceptable.

      when you buy tivo service, you are not paying for the right to ff through commericials. you are paying to get the program listing downloaded into your device. in fact you can certainly use your tivo without the monthly fee, you just need to program the record times and channels manually. tivo does not make money off of the device. your thinking of the manufacturers, like sony, and everyone else that produces tivo devices. tivo writes the software for the device, but it's done on a no-profit basis in order to get more tivo devices out there and therefore get more subscriptions to the listing service. tivo is not is a position to charge premiums to device manufacturers to use the tivo service.

    154. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by nlvp · · Score: 1

      It's not a bad idea. Your cable may cost you money, but TiVo doesn't see that cash. They're building a business at the expense of advertisers, who represent the greatest income flow to the industry, so it stands to reason that they're under immense commercial pressure to not only remove advertising, but replace it with something.

      Of course we don't want advertising, but we have to acknowledge that it's the revenues from advertising that pump money into the TV and Movie supply chain. Take that away, and there's less money to pay for the Gandolfinis and Nicholsons that most people want to watch.

      Let's inject a dose of realism here...

    155. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 1

      LoL!

      So -- When the red light comes on in your vehicle, that's just an advertisement for having your engine serviced?

      This does help me understand the consumerism mentality, though -- thank you.

    156. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Elvisisdead · · Score: 1

      No shite. I remember when there weren't ads on MTV (and good music, but that's OT). HD has taken a turn for the worse in the same fashion. One of the benefits of HD content was that there were no ads made in HD, so I found myself watching HDNet or Discovery HD just to avoid ads. Now, some bastard has filmed Circuit City ads in HD, and they play them all the time. Now think about when you used to go to the movies with no previews and no ads. It's an evil cycle...

      --

      "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
    157. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Caseyscrib · · Score: 2, Informative
      I disagree. I think, most people, bought Tivo for its timeshifting and season pass features. Are commercials really so bad?

      Ya know, back several years ago there used to be limits on how many commercials were allowed to be on tv. It was something like 2 minutes for every half hour. Then the companies lobbied the FCC and said they would behave. For the first few years they did as they promised, and slowly started to get worse and worse. It has now gotten so out of hand there are nearly 8 minutes of commercials for every 30 minutes. If they could make money out of 2 minutes of air time, they can certainly make money out of 8. I don't think media executives are worrying about putting food on their plate.

    158. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Eh, realism's overrated anyway.

      Besides, I don't really care about "most people," so I have no problem with not being able to pay Gandolfini and Nicholson.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    159. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by GutBomb · · Score: 1

      i don;t fast forward through commercials because i have something against ads... i fast forward through them because i do not want to wait through them to get back to my show. if they want to run banners they can go ahead. i can ignore them while i fast foward through the other commercials. it's the fact that a 3 minute long break 5 times an hour takes me out of the show. fast forwarding for 10-20 seconds 5 times in 46 minutes, even with banners on the screen, is tolerable for me.

    160. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 1

      Tell ya what... Since I'm paying for the commercials and I don't watch them, I'd like a refund for all the time I have spent _not_ watching them.

    161. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 1

      I'd be happy with just an "Iron Chef" network. The other Food Network programming is inconsequential to me.

    162. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by feepness · · Score: 1

      Except I didn't have to spend $300 up front for HBO, on top of their monthly subscription. If I cancel HBO, I'm not losing anything. If I cancel the TiVo service, that $300 box just became a big paperweight.

      It already is a $300 paperweight. I paid $150 for my Tivo and got a $100 rebate.

    163. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by superflippy · · Score: 1

      I mean, its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding

      Actually, I am paying attention while I fast forward, watching for my show to start so I know when to take my finger off the button. And if I see an ad that looks particularly interesting or a promo for a show I missed (the curse of TiVo, always cutting off the promos for next week's show), I will stop and watch it. Banner ads will get in the way and actually result in my viewing fewer regular TV ads.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    164. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why are you commenting on this thread? Is it just to shore up your smug sense of superiority?

    165. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      I don't think you belong here. This is Slashdot. Nobody on Slashdot watches football. Football is a "jock thing", and Slashdot members are the anti-jock.

    166. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      "free tv" needs some sort of revenue.

      ?????

      they *charge* for this service. how much money do they need????????

    167. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Curly · · Score: 1

      I AM often looking at something while I'm fast-forwarding: I'm looking to see when the commercials are over.

      If they didn't think I was looking at the screen while I was fast-forwarding, they wouldn't try to put ads there.

      I'm not looking for "free tv", nor am I getting it with satellite tv and a tivo subscription.

      I would pay a monthly surplus to have the "don't even record commercials at all" feature; they can give that money to the advertisers if they want to. I just don't want to look at ads.

      If they cover a portion of the fast-forward screen with ads, that's the end of my tivo...

    168. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Me too, as soon as ST:Voyager ended. My wife watches the news on our ATI TV Tuner card once in a while, but my real TV isn't even hooked up right now.

      On the downside, I spend a lot more time on the internet now. :-/

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    169. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Someone has to pay the salaries of the players that play against your beloved BoSox. Else there would be no league, no games, and no reason for BoSox to exist.

      How about if we spread the cost/wealth equally or as we prefer so it's not always the Yankees? I believe that was the GP's point. The Twins tried to "build the franchise's value" this year by sticking the cable providers with a 2 dollar per subscriber demand (and it was for all cable subscribers, not just premium). Their franchise was, er, devalued by the cable companies. The same should hold true for the Yankees. No sports team should be able to dictate the price of cable.

    170. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by tylernt · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I think I prefer the product placement to outright ads. Ads jar you out of your show or movie, making it more difficult to really enjoy the show. When I watch episodes I've recorded and cut the commercials from, I find I "get into" the show and identify with the characters more etc.

      Then again, at least I can cut out or skip commercials, something I can't do with product placement. Yeah, let's keep the ad breaks please. :)

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    171. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by tylernt · · Score: 1

      That is so true it hurts.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    172. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase that: "Grass-roots produced, bittorrent-distributed, GPL licensed software will replace commercial software eventually."

      I see that happening *today*, _without_ money involved. I have no trouble believing it can be the same for media.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    173. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Perfect. I would much rather subscribe to a series than a channel.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    174. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not required to sign a contract to agree it it.

    175. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh cry me a river. Would you prefer there are no ads, and the subscription fee is tripled instead?

    176. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's such incredible bullshit.

      If you're fast-forwarding through some commercials waiting for them to be over, who the fuck cares if there's an ad overlayed on the screen while it's happening? You don't care about that time anyway, so what's the fucking difference WHAT'S on the screen while you're fast-forwarding?

      This is not equivilant to displaying ads while you use your computer. It's more along the lines of displaying ads while you wait for, say, Windows to install. WHICH, HOLY SHIT, MICROSOFT DOES THAT. (Except they just advertise Windows.)

    177. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean like the 12.00 a month they charge for service??

    178. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      It depends upon how they're done. If it's something like a character (or set of characters) drinking a Coke or Pepsi - no problem.

      If you've got poorly done placement - stuff that's out of place or blatantly in the way - then I'd just as soon have commercials because at least you can skip them.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    179. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you did the same. Kudos right back atcha!

    180. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by irving47 · · Score: 1

      Right. Sure. Of course. $12.95 a month for TiVo service and $50 or so for cable. It's free. I'm sure this means they'll reduce the prices on the monthly service (something they should do anyway for those of us not using the dialup ISP service to get listings) and on the lifetime passes. RIGHT?

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    181. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      "I've already paid for the hardware and paid for the service"

      But others aren't. Did you see the post about the person who paid $30 for Tivo? TiVo is trying to shift to a more sustainable revenue stream. Studies have shown that people would rather pay less and lose some time to advertising. Perhaps not you, but most people.

      I would tend to agree that it is at least unethical for them to switch models *after* you have paid the original rate for hardware and service (assuming you got the lifetime service). However, it is perfectly reasonable for them to adapt their model to increase market share.

    182. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Mark+Clements · · Score: 1

      Hear me, I beg - the parent post speaks true.

      Anyway. In addition to your post striking a very nostalgic chord; it also reminds me of a quote - at least when I heard it, attributed to Annie Liebowitz: "Isn't it amazing? First, there was Television that was free, transmitted over the air, like magic! Now, we pay to have TV delivered to our house over a wire." Backwards, huh?

    183. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Yes, many of the required costs were paid out by the cable companies long ago, but don't they have the right to recoup their investments?

      Not really. They gambled on a loss-leader. If people decide the "real" price of Cable TV is too high, their business model takes a nose-dive and crashes. Market-economy.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    184. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Someone has to pay the salaries of the players that play against your beloved BoSox. Else there would be no league, no games, and no reason for BoSox to exist

      Baseball players are not paid 'salaries' they are paid obscene amounts of money. There would be plenty of players if they were paid less, say a million a season rather than per month.

      I have Dish TV, if they decided to force banner ads onto me then I would immediately switch to another carrier.

      Besides 80% of the ads I see are for a quack sliming medicine for $139 a bottle and the bowflex extercise machine whose current front guy who is implied to have slimmed down from 300lb using bowflex actually got that way through a gastric bypass, liposuction and a tummy tuck. If the bowflex guys were a little smarter they would not have advertised on the documentary of their front guy having the major surgery etc.

      Lets see how many weeks it is before Tivo folds on this one. I think it will not be long.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    185. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      I disagree. I think, most people, bought Tivo for its timeshifting and season pass features. Are commercials really so bad?

      Irrelevant what you bought it for, its what the people who are complaining bought it for that is the issue.

      I never trusted Tivo, always hated their grasping business plan. Now it is going to come back and bite them (Tivo) in the patootzee. All those people on Tivo subscriptions are going to make their views known.

      I pay for my satelite TV, I dont give a wetcrap what ABC's advertisers want to show me, I don't want to see it. If they are paying for that ad well more fool them.

      The business model will rebalance. If the idiots in Congress try to outlaw ad skipping then they will see a major 'throw the bastards out' movement in 2006.

      As anyone who read my arguments that Napster was an obscene company knows I don't beleive in something for nothing. Sure the content owners will need to be paid. But they don't have the right or the ability to decide how.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    186. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      No, but the little Honda logo next to it is just another advertisement, and yes branding is a form of advertisment.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    187. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      No verbal aggrement, no hand shake, no wink and nod, nothing. I just went to the store and purchased it and plugged it in.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    188. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope...

    189. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by nlvp · · Score: 1

      Well, pick your two favourite actors, and assume they only make movies that cannot be distributed by media that is TiVo-able, because that way it protects their value.

      Now do you care?

      Don't get me wrong - I agree that it *shouldn't* be an issue, but we live in a world governed by economic realities, and much as that may suck at times, like democracy, it's the best system we have.

    190. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I'll happily accept never seeing a movie by even my favorite actors (not that I've ever thought about it enough to pick one or two favorites) again if the choice is between that and losing my right to personal property. Because you know if that door is opened, it won't stop there. Computers can do all the stuff TiVos can do -- if it's right that we shouldn't be allowed complete control over our TiVos, then it must be right that we shouldn't be allowed complete control over our computers, either. Just think -- no more music "piracy," no more movie "piracy," no more video game "piracy," heck, no more copyright infringement at all! Because you know copyright was originally designed with the goal of letting big media cartels charge per view for every bit of our culture, right? I mean, the crazy idea of "limited times" and "enriching the public domain" had nothing to do with it! It sounds like this whole "Microsoft Palladium*" thing must be a great idea! Gotta get rid of those dirty hackers with communist ideas like "software should be Free," right?

      Sorry, but no. It's a slippery slope argument, but I don't care -- it's possible that government and industry would stop short of fascism, but with the way things are going, I don't trust them to.

      *They changed the name, but they're still working on the same concept...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    191. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by nlvp · · Score: 1

      Everything, taken to an extreme, is bad. But the blind and fanatical preservation of individual control over distribution channels is, viewed from the supplier side, a rot that gradually sets in to your revenue stream, compromising your ability to run a viable business. It's a tradeoff, and you have to be somewhere on it. Standing at one extreme and justifying that by claiming that any compromise on your position is "the thin end of the wedge" or a "slippery slope" is a form of denial. Ultimately, you reach the point where providers won't provide without some form of social contract that is enforceable. Without the ability to enforce revenues for services provided, large segments of consumers will take them for free - the honesty model is crap as any of my friends who tried the shareware model will attest to. Hence people will provide services and goods if they can be guaranteed at least some measure of control over the channel through which their product is distributed. In business today, especially in intangible goods (data/music/software/tv/movies) channel control is the only guarantee that you will be treated fairly by your end users. The slippery slope as far as they're concerned is when you start to turn a blind eye to the fact that some people can bypass the revenue model and effectively compromise the revenue-earning ability of your product through the *way* in which they consume your product. I don't have the answer, but resisting anyone's ability to present advertising removes the current revenue model, and it is isn't replaced by another, then the supply of movies/tv is also compromised. At what cost your right to bypass advertising?

    192. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I think the fundamental difference here is that you're arguing about economics, and I'm arguing about rights and freedoms. Yes, I'm aware that if I get my way it could kill the entire entertainment industry (except for Creative Commons-like stuff and live performances), but so be it!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    193. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by bmcent1 · · Score: 1
      Uhh, they do. Every time I boot my system I get a Tyan [...]

      Re-read the parent's comment. It said, while using the computer. You are not using your computer during boot, you are waiting for it get to a useful state. Also, some of the boot splash and BIOS splash screens can be disabled so you are not forced to view them. Grub sure can, just set the delay to 0 seconds.

      sitting her at work there is a big DELL advertisement just below the screen

      That's not even close to the same. The logo on the bezel does not reduce or obscure your screen realestate.

      My Tivo has a Tivo logo on it. That's fine, it was there when I bought it and I was okay with it then. There was no advert during fast forward when I bought it. A logo on the case compared to something added later, that obscures my view and reduces the utility of my Tivo, are two totally different things.

      Nice troll though.

      --

      "Hey Albert, Good luck exploring the infinite abyss."

    194. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by nlvp · · Score: 1

      Right, well then there are two real points I disagree with you on.

      First, I like the entertainment industry, and I don't see why an entire industry should be brought crashing to the ground because new technology allows people to break the law without getting caught. It's still breaking the law.

      Second, The entertainment industry has existed on these principles since it's inception. These are not old freedoms you're protecting, but new ones that have been acquired at someone else's expense. Nobody argued 20 years ago that people should be allowed to share any data they wanted in a completely unsupervised manner regardless of the owner or legal nature of that content.

      The new technology that enables you to fast-forward through adverts is the forcible acquisition of a new right. This right had already been eroded by VCRs, but now it's acquired completely. There's absolutely no reason why the industry and those who can still exercise channel control shouldn't be allowed to exercise *their* rights to put whatever they want on the screen if you're going to use their technology or their content.

      Think about the consequences. The removal of advertising breaks will result in inline advertising during the feature presentation - this is already happening occasionally. Just because it's the natural evolution of the medium doesn't mean it's heading to a better place, and I for one don't want them shoving adverts onto the screen while I'm trying to watch the latest episode of 24. Unfortunately, now that advertising breaks are becoming a thing of the past, it's the next logical step.

      This protection of "rights" at whatever cost, and to hell with the consequences, seems a little narrow-minded and very short-sighted to me. But as you say, we'll just have to disagree on that. If we were to have a vote among viewers of whether they wanted to have to put up with advertising breaks, or they could have no advertising but a significant drop in the quality of the programming, my guess is that they'd agree to put up with the advertising - I know I would. This is why I'm glad your minority (in my opinion) isn't winning this argument in practice - although on Slashdot, I don't expect to have many agree with me.

    195. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Fine, you're welcome to disagree with me. However, I've got to take issue with this:

      First, I like the entertainment industry, and I don't see why an entire industry should be brought crashing to the ground because new technology allows people to break the law without getting caught. It's still breaking the law.

      I'm sorry, but saying "it's wrong because it's against the law" is completely stupid and backwards -- only "it's against the law because it's wrong" is valid. Other than "it's against the law" and protecting the entertainment industry, do you have any good reasons why sharing information is wrong?

      Also, keep in mind that you're talking about protectionism, not laissez-faire capitalism, and that in the long run the entertainment industry can't win, any more than the prohibitionists did in the 30s. Has the "War On Drugs" resulted in fewer drug users, or just more criminals?

      Second, The entertainment industry has existed on these principles since it's inception. These are not old freedoms you're protecting, but new ones that have been acquired at someone else's expense. Nobody argued 20 years ago that people should be allowed to share any data they wanted in a completely unsupervised manner regardless of the owner or legal nature of that content.

      Are you joking?! The entertainment industry -- or at least the Hollywood movie industry -- was founded on the principle of violating "Intellectual Property" rights. The whole reason it sprang up in California wasn't because of the weather, but to escape Thomas Edison's movie camera monopoly. They only managed to exist by ignoring his patents!

      Moreover, these "new freedoms" of personal property and freedom of information have existed longer than "Intellectual Property" itself! Really, do you think writers ever deserved to have control over how their books were used?

      And inclusion of "Intellectual Property" rights (Jefferson called them "monopolies") into the Constitution was by no means assured; in fact, Jefferson had to be persuaded, and even then only reluctantly included them. So no, nobody 20 years ago argued that, but 200 years ago they did!

      The new technology that enables you to fast-forward through adverts is not the "forcible acquisition of a new right," it's actually the reassertion of an old one! It's both sad and disturbing that the entertainment industry has brainwashed the public into thinking otherwise.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  2. TiVo's new business model? by TrollBridge · · Score: 1

    1. Shoot self in foot by eliminating product's most popular feature.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:TiVo's new business model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Shoot self in foot by eliminating product's most popular feature.
      2. !!!
      3. Watch profit fly out the window?

    2. Re:TiVo's new business model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean:

      1. Shoot self in foot by eliminating product's most popular feature.
      2. ???
      3. Profit?

  3. Get people hooked... by Chatmag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then hammer them with advertising. Its the american way :)

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    1. Re:Get people hooked... by TrollBridge · · Score: 1

      And the next step of The American Way(tm) would be to drop TiVo like a bad habit. But people seem to be too complacent, these days, to take action against even the most blatant bait-and-switch moves like this. It's a shame.

      How many Slashdotters/TiVo users will have the guts to back their outrage with action?

      --
      There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    2. Re:Get people hooked... by L0C0loco · · Score: 1

      I hope people who bought lifetime membership are still happy with their decision to do so. You would think that buying a lifetime subscription would entitle you to lock in the feature set available at the time of subscription.

      --
      -- Instant Karma's gonna get you! [320848 = 2*2*2*2*11*1823]
    3. Re:Get people hooked... by Altus · · Score: 1


      after shelling out big bucks for a TIVO and maybe more time and money upgrading it.

      I think I would suffer through the ads.... rather than spend the same money again on some other DVR.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    4. Re:Get people hooked... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      >>Then hammer them with advertising. Its the american way :)

      I would have ended that statement with ":(" myself .

      > How many Slashdotters/TiVo users will have the guts to back their outrage with action?

      Considering the slowness of www.mythtv.org right now, probably a few :-).

      TiVo is dead to me. I'm definitely going ahead and building my own. I've been gritting my teeth for years whenever I saw crap I didn't want show up on the main screen, but that didn't disgust me enough to change.

    5. Re:Get people hooked... by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      You know you can turn off suggestions, right?

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    6. Re:Get people hooked... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      He's probably talking about the spam TV, which I believe you still have in the US.

      (In case you don't, what Tivo started doing is forcing every single unit to record the same program... during primetime!!! The only way to stop the recording was to powercycle the box. They tried it *once* in the UK and the bad publicity basically killed the market (so much that they're still not considering coming back)... Tivo is known as 'the box that forces you to watch programmes' to most people, even now).

    7. Re:Get people hooked... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Really, I've never heard of this. Either way I've got a dual tuner DirectTiVo so untill it forces two recordings on me at once, I'm not going to even notice. I'm guessing these are the prerecorded informational thingies that appear on the main screen. I always thought they were kinda pointless but cool. Never considered the horrors of having it forced while I'm watching something else. Why doesn't tivo just schedule these things for off hours?

    8. Re:Get people hooked... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      It does to a point, as many of the new features are only on the newest models, and a lifetime subscription only covers the model you buy (you can't move your subscription to a machine of a different model period (there is a one time exception for people who bought thier lifetime subscription before this was "clarified")

    9. Re:Get people hooked... by ibbey · · Score: 1

      This isn't quite right. It automatically recorded a program, but it's not like it foprced it on you. I can't prove anything, but I can't imagine that the Tivo wouldn't have behaved any different then it does any other time it wants to record something (As for permission, then let you change channels away at any time). It does this whenever it records a program, whether it's one you asked for or one you didn't. If you can show that it did otherwise in that, please document it with a link. (I rember the case you're referring to... As I recall, the uproar was that it recorded a post watershed program).

    10. Re:Get people hooked... by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      The showcases and such are recorded, but in the US it is usually at 4 or 5 am, and I don't think it will preempt a recording for it.

      For a moment I thought, oh, middle of the night here, primetime in the UK, but the time difference is 5-9 hours, in the wrong direction.

      I have been using a Tivo since May 2000, and never, never, had anything like what you are talking about.

    11. Re:Get people hooked... by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      It depends on the ads. If it simply replaces what you already see with a logo and doesn't take up extra time, it doesn't damage the fast forwarding experience.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    12. Re:Get people hooked... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I have Suggestions turned off, I'm referring to the "Win a trip to Hollywood for 8!" junk. I've never seen a way to turn that off.

    13. Re:Get people hooked... by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about "Showcase" on DirectTivo you can turn that off too. Remove channels 581 and 582 from "Channels I Receive"

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  4. Get a ReplayTV by nwf · · Score: 3, Informative

    All the more reason to get a ReplayTV! I love mine, which I've had for a few years after upgrading the hard drive to a 250 GB model. And DVArchive rocks: download shows and save them for later! Store a whole seasons worth on your PC and access them over the network from your ReplayTV unit.

    --
    I don't know, but it works for me.
    1. Re:Get a ReplayTV by vision33r · · Score: 1

      My oldie 4504 model ReplayTV still does Commercial skips..

  5. screw them by hsmith · · Score: 1

    my dad asked me to build one for him, yeah it may be a bit more expensive but you don't have to put up wiht this corporate shit, i only watch movies so it doesn't bother me. $400 total compared to the ~$200 for tivo +subscription, meh


    build your own
    ????
    profit

    1. Re:screw them by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      If you have DirectTV, the Tivo will cost you $99 tops, and the service is $4.99 no matter how many you have. Can you build one for less than a hundred bucks? Can you keep it running for less than 60 bucks a year?

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    2. Re:screw them by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > Can you build one for less than a hundred bucks?

      Not likely

      > Can you keep it running for less than 60 bucks a year?

      Maybe.

      What a self built solution will do is ensure you don't depend on the whim of whatever company.

  6. This is really going to ruin the spice channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Suffering Viagra ads while I'm skipping to the money shot.

    1. Re:This is really going to ruin the spice channel by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Funny

      It'd be stupid to advertise Viagra to you anyway, since if you're fast-forwarding through porn you must have the opposite problem...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:This is really going to ruin the spice channel by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      There are no money shots on the spice channel. Not that I watch it. I've heard there are no money shots on the spice channel.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    3. Re:This is really going to ruin the spice channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It'd be stupid to advertise Viagra to you anyway, since if you're fast-forwarding through porn you must have the opposite problem..."

      too much porn to watch in real time?

    4. Re:This is really going to ruin the spice channel by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I was thinking premature ejaculation (it just takes all the fun out of the joke when you have to explain it...).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  7. that's fine with me by rtsai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The real value-add from TiVo here (for me, anyway) is not so much avoiding commercials as it is saving time.

    If the banner-ad-while-fast-forwarding still allows me to skip 4 minutes of commercials in 5 seconds, that's fine with me, as long as the banner-ad goes away when I'm *not* fast-forwarding ...

    1. Re:that's fine with me by LilMikey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not meaning to completely hijaack this thread but MythTV supports automatic commercial skip. It'll automagically jump past your commercials or you can skip them with the click of one button. Even 5 seconds is too long in MythTV land :)

      True that some ReplayTV series had a similar feature but that's been done away with.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    2. Re:that's fine with me by javaxman · · Score: 1
      The real value-add from TiVo here (for me, anyway) is not so much avoiding commercials as it is saving time.

      The ability to record shows with a click of a button or ala 'Season Pass' is _really_ the killer feature.

      Still, skipping commercials is the other killer DVR feature, and since I'm not watching what's on the screen ( except to look for the start of the show ), the idea of a NOT TOO LARGE banner add is no big deal at all. *Especially* if it keeps Tivo in business and keeps their subscription rates down.

      Where this will kill Tivo is if the add gets too large and makes skipping not viable. Then they won't get the ad views, they'll just lose customers to competing DVRs. I don't think they're dumb enough to do that, they're a little too worried about competition as it is.

      The bottom line is, I'll trade 2 minutes of annoying TV commercials for a 4 second static add *any* day. I'd prefer it wasn't there, but if they put one on, it's not like I'm getting rid of my Tivo.

    3. Re:that's fine with me by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Actually from what I understand the ad with directly be for whatever ad is showing at the time. So it won't interfer with the knowing what commerical is on or that the show is on, it will infact enhance this.

      I could definatly be wrong, but I know they currently do have a small thing in the upper right corner that says press thumb up if you want to record a show being advertised, or more information about a product. I've only seen this once, but it was viewable through normal watching of the commerical as well as ffwing through the commerical. It is probably not as viewable through 30 second skipping through commericals, but this is an unsupported feature. Sadly they may do away with it for this, hopefully not.

    4. Re:that's fine with me by bgspence · · Score: 1

      Remember that 4 minutes of commercials are 30 seconds of fast forward ads at 8x max speed with or without banners.

    5. Re:that's fine with me by javaxman · · Score: 1
      Actually from what I understand the ad with directly be for whatever ad is showing at the time.

      That's definitely a level of detail I didn't find in any of the articles on this that I've seen ( 3 total, I think ).

      The current "thumbs up" thing that they do is of course targeted towards specific commercials, and they could continue to do it that way- only show banners for commercials currently being skipped- but they wouldn't need to be limited to that. There'd be at least one problem with that approach- 30 seconds at full-speed fast-forward is nothing, that banner would just flick on and off. I'm willing to bet the banners would be set for the duration of the fast-forward. How would they interact with the current thumbs-up thingie? Interesting question, we'll find out, I guess...

    6. Re:that's fine with me by mr_zorg · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. While I think it's slightly "slimy" to do this, as long as it performs as the parent suggests I'm fine with it. I wonder if they'll lower the monthy subscription fee or eliminated completely in exchange?

      On the other hand, if TiVo could find a way to get rid of those HUGE, ANNOYING, ANIMATED banners that many networks have started showing DURING THE SHOW, I'd let them to anything they want. Hmm. Wait, you don't suppose all us commercial skipping DVR users are the REASON they started doing that, do you? :-)

    7. Re:that's fine with me by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Well from this article. One article I read specifically said this was being rolled out because of the great approval they heard from their customers about the thumbs up thingy. Apparently people really like interacting with TV even if its only for ads. Honestly, I think if implimentent the way they hint, as I see a product a press a button and it helps me buy or find out about it (hopefully not right now as I'm watching tv) would be a good thing in my book.

  8. Questions by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First of all, HR 2391 doesn't make it criminal to "skip commercials".

    It's meant to disallow technologies that bypass commercial and advertising content explicitly (such as things like the commercial skip features of old which skipped all ads, regardless of length, and returned you to the programming, or features that simply delete or auto-skip ad content altogether), but it won't prevent good ol' "fast forward" and 30 second skip features from working, nor will it make their use, even for commercial content, "criminal".

    However, it's the implementation that is the concern. If the law is *interpreted* to mean that even things like fast forwarding through commercials are inappropriate, well, then we have a problem. But that is NOT the intent nor the purpose.

    On the subject of TiVo and placing banner ads during fast forwarding, and the general idea of *automatic* ad content skipping/deletion:

    If the entire TV industry is predicated on advertising, and the idea of advertising is predicating on paying to have as many people see your ads as possible (and the payment is proportional to proven amounts of people who may be watching), if an increasing number of people (many in educated and financially stable demographics) have the capability to avoid ever seeing any advertising, what, exactly, makes it worthwhile for advertisers to continue paying for it, at least at the same levels? You are choosing to watch content whose creation and delivery is funded in large part by advertising revenues. What funds it if that model is completely broken?

    Sure, your cable/satellite bill can, but only to a point. There are billions of dollars that come from advertising. Is there not that side to this story as well?

    What about newspapers? Sure, you can argue that newspaper ads aren't "intrusive", in a time-dependent way, but would a newspaper or its advertisers welcome a service that made it free or easy to eliminate all ads, and keep the other content, while still keeping the newspaper cost at 50 cents?

    Additionally, I've seen people here and elsewhere say they actually wouldn't mind "advertising" for products and services they're actually interested in - but at the same time, people argue against giving anyone the data needed to do exactly that kind of targeted advertising as a violation of privacy.

    So, my question is, what takes the place of the advertising revenue? How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?

    1. Re:Questions by realdpk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "However, it's the implementation that is the concern. If the law is *interpreted* to mean that even things like fast forwarding through commercials are inappropriate, well, then we have a problem. But that is NOT the intent nor the purpose."

      In an age when we have so many thousands (millions?) of lawyers in the nation, I do not think you can separate intent or purpose from what is written and how it is interpreted. We can't afford to be writing laws that are vague, and we have the resources to ensure it does not happen, should we choose to use them.

      "Sure, your cable/satellite bill can, but only to a point. There are billions of dollars that come from advertising. Is there not that side to this story as well?"

      I'd pay more per channel for cable if it had no advertising, no problem. Note I say per channel -- as in a la carte. Since I watch 2 or 3 channels via my TiVo I would probably end up paying less overall, but the channels whose services I use would be getting more.

      "How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?"

      It's acceptable exactly up to the point that the consumers allow it to be. If the consumers revolt, spend extra money on a product and service that allows them to skip them, it's no longer acceptable to them.

    2. Re:Questions by SoupGuru · · Score: 1
      I can turn my TV off during commercial breaks. I can turn my back, plug my ears, and repeat "lalalala". I can rig up an insanely complicated method of dropping a black sheet over the TV screen and drowning out any sound with severely amplified "Inagadadavida". In short, people don't have to watch ads. They never have. And still the industry has survived. Survived? No, grown stronger.

      --
      What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    3. Re:Questions by Japong · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Boy, you must really hate Firefox's Adblock and Flashblock features.

      As much as I'd like to preserve the old business model of being forced to look at ads for minutes at a time, it's time to rethink this strategy now that we have 21st century technology... simply giving them billions of dollars in revenue because the're accustomed to getting billions of dollars of revenue doesn't cut it anymore.

    4. Re:Questions by micromoog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sir, I want to buy your "Inagadadavida" ad-blocking system.

    5. Re:Questions by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nothing replaces the advertising revenue -- or, at least, nothing replaces it directly. Its value falls sharply. That, in turn, will lead to two classes of things: first, the amount on interstitial advertising on television will rise, and the amount of advertising woven into a show (e.g. as voice-throughs during dialog, as rolling bars at the bottom of the screen, or as product placements) will rise. The total amount of advertising-loaded time during each show will rise.

    6. Re:Questions by Mr+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How does this make it less wrong?

      The point is that if I want to attach a device to my television that translates every third word into Algonquin once the signal comes into my device it's none of their business. If I write a module for MythTV that allows me to change all the commercials in my LiveTV programming into mpegs of dancing midgets throwing pickles at a naked woman it's none of their business.

      Their revenue stream and rights to artistic integrity end when they reach the consumer. At that point it's my signal in my device and as long as I don't rebroadcast it they need to leave me the hell alone.

    7. Re:Questions by saintp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the same business tactic as the RIAA is using: if you refuse to evolve, legislate! Rather than adapt to a changing world, make new business models illegal. Sure, it may cripple you in the long run, but as long as we avoid that invisible hand and keep the stockholders happy, all is well. Right?

    8. Re:Questions by bigpat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "What about newspapers? Sure, you can argue that newspaper ads aren't "intrusive", in a time-dependent way, but would a newspaper or its advertisers welcome a service that made it free or easy to eliminate all ads, and keep the other content, while still keeping the newspaper cost at 50 cents?"

      The difference is that tv, especially broadcast television, is a much more limited resource than a newspaper. Anyone can start up a newspaper and start distributing it, it is not regulated in the least. Which is a very good thing, but also appropriate for the medium which allows for naturally unlimited competition. If you don't like the content or presentation of one newspaper, another could take its place without much trouble.

      Television, especially broadcast television is considered a public resource. So, we as individuals have every right to demand that the use of the airwaves meets our best interests and not solely those of the licensees. We can argue about the rightness of that approach, but until broadcasters stop using public airwaves and the public rights of way (cable) then I demand that I be able to view the content anyway I damn well choose.

    9. Re:Questions by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      It's meant to disallow technologies that bypass commercial and advertising content explicitly (such as things like the commercial skip features of old which skipped all ads, regardless of length, and returned you to the programming, or features that simply delete or auto-skip ad content altogether), but it won't prevent good ol' "fast forward" and 30 second skip features from working, nor will it make their use, even for commercial content, "criminal".

      No, it doesn't do that either. It doesn't prohibit anything. 106 does that, if anything does. It just provides an exemption -- a limited one -- but an exemption. Certainly such conduct as people have been talking about is either illegal now, or is legal if it falls into a different exemption, such as 107. This doesn't alter 107.

      So it either is ineffectual in that nothing more is exempted than would be anyway (but at least it is more clear, which is good), or it is beneficial in that things are exempted that wouldn't be exempt under 107. It is not bad in any way.

      It's all the rest of the bill that is VERY bad.

      As for advertising, I'm against it in all circumstances whatsoever. I hate ads and if I never see another one ever again unless I explicitly want to do just that, only then would I be happy.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    10. Re:Questions by gthrash6 · · Score: 1
      If the entire TV industry is predicated on advertising, and the idea of advertising is predicating on paying to have as many people see your ads as possible (and the payment is proportional to proven amounts of people who may be watching), if an increasing number of people (many in educated and financially stable demographics) have the capability to avoid ever seeing any advertising, what, exactly, makes it worthwhile for advertisers to continue paying for it, at least at the same levels? You are choosing to watch content whose creation and delivery is funded in large part by advertising revenues. What funds it if that model is completely broken?
      The solution seems obvious to me - present advertising in a form that people want to watch. Everyone is stuck with the idea that advertising is something you subject people to, then you reward them with the show. If the advertising wasn't painful to watch, you wouldn't even need the show.
    11. Re:Questions by merdark · · Score: 1

      So, my question is, what takes the place of the advertising revenue?

      i don't know. But anything is better than ads.

      How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?

      This is easy. When I ask to see ads. Otherwise, never. For instance, if I am interested in some device, I can ask to see ads for all devices meeting my criteria. Of cousre, this puts the big boys on a level playing field with the little guy... so it will never fly.

      So I'll just keep on aggressivly blocking ads as much as I can. It's an information war out there.

    12. Re:Questions by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1
      As much as I'd like to preserve the old business model of being forced to look at ads for minutes at a time, it's time to rethink this strategy now that we have 21st century technology...

      I really hope that advertising will become a dying industry. People have become so immune to it due to over-saturation that it may become ineffective for the amount spent on it. Personally, I never realised how much we get bombarded with until I visited countries with relatively little advertising.

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    13. Re:Questions by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You are choosing to watch content whose creation and delivery is funded in large part by advertising revenues. What funds it if that model is completely broken?

      Well, economist Joseph Schumpeter came up with the theory of "creative destruction". In short, every now and then, a new innovation destroys the old economic model (think TiVo or, in the retail field, think Wal-Mart). The capitalist society comes up with a new way to respond to that innovation. In the case of TiVo, it appears that they will now have pop-up ads. In the case of Wal-Mart, you now see Sears and KMart merging. However, TiVo started the revolution, and now they are trying to take a step backwards. Unfortunately for them, there is a good chance the revolution is about to pass TiVo right by.

      What does that do for the Advertisers? Well, they better figure something out, otherwise, their economic model completely falls apart. In a capitalist society (which the US claims to be), it is up to the advertisers to figure their way out of this mess. If the advertisers don't figure it out, you'll see less money flowing to the TV networks and, a potential reduction in TV show budgets. Now, wouldn't THAT be a disaster! Those overpaid actors and network executives would start losing money. Oh well. If Hollywood isn't providing me with dumb entertainment, my entertainment dollar will go elsewhere.

      Creative Destruction. It's time that advertisers re-read their college economics textbooks. In short, I don't care about the advertisers, nor do I care about how the networks make money. In our economy, their problems are not my problems.

    14. Re:Questions by Megaweapon · · Score: 1

      First of all, HR 2391 doesn't make it criminal to "skip commercials".

      But this is Slashdot, where facts don't matter, it's mindless rhetoric that gets them the page/ad hits.

      --
      I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    15. Re:Questions by rdc_uk · · Score: 1

      " First of all, HR 2391 doesn't make it criminal to "skip commercials".

      It's meant to disallow technologies that bypass commercial and advertising content explicitly"

      Not read the proposed law, but...

      Some things immediately spring to mind:

      Pop-Up-Blocker (technology designed to bypass advertising - paid for advertising placement no less)

      Spam-Filter (technology designed to bypass advertising, though not paid-for in the same sense)

      Given the current US trend for "scatter gun laws" (DMCA? PATRIOT?), what chance that these technologies in fact WILL come under this law's auspices?

    16. Re:Questions by noscule · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't understand why they need advertising revenue anyway. I've just paid about £120 (roughly $200) annual fee for my TV Licence which pays for about five and half channels of excellent BBC television, about eight channels of radio (plus the world service and numbwerous local stations) and one of the world's finest web sites and information services. And the establishment of a creative commons-based archive. All of it without a single advertisement or commercial. I think that's excellent value for money and it proves that revenue from commercials isn't necessary. Pity it'll never happen in the U.S. - Andrew

    17. Re:Questions by igaborf · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If the law is *interpreted* to mean that even things like fast forwarding through commercials are inappropriate, well, then we have a problem.

      I have a problem with it anyway. It's a law that says I can do a thing but I cannot have a machine that does that thing for me. WTF? It's as though they passed a law that says you cannot use an electric can opener because forcing people to open cans manually will keep the market for food contained in glass bottles competitive with cans.

      And make no mistake, the intent is to keep people watching commercials, whatever the mechanics of the process. If the law as written doesn't have that end result, it will be reinterpreted or a new law will be written to further restrict our options.

      How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?

      How about letting the market decide that? If the payback from advertising drops to the point where it can no longer support creation and delivery of programming, what then? Will the demand for programming go away? I sincerely doubt it. Other revenue models will emerge, including direct payment (subscription and pay-per-view). What's wrong with that?

    18. Re:Questions by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Advertising will continue to get more and more invasive until people finally have enough and actually revolt against it.

      With the rise of SSRIs, people won't get enough. They'll just go on with life and 'not worry' about their rights being taken away.

      These are scary times.

    19. Re:Questions by Grand+Facade · · Score: 1

      So the next step will be that I can't hang up on a telemarketer without violating his right to free speech!

      Feh!

      --
      Rick B.
    20. Re:Questions by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

      Additionally, I've seen people here and elsewhere say they actually wouldn't mind "advertising" for products and services they're actually interested in - but at the same time, people argue against giving anyone the data needed to do exactly that kind of targeted advertising as a violation of privacy.

      Personally, I wouldn't mind receiving (some) advertising for the latest video games, techie stuff, or other things I'm interested in. If I could somehow tell all advertising-generating entities to send me advertising about such topics as I indicate AND ONLY those topics, that sounds appealing.

      The problem is, corporations share all kinds of data about me. Forgetting about privacy issues altogether, they don't ask me what I want advertising for. They use whatever bits of info they have about me to make those decisions. They look at my profile or demographic or whatever and use that to decide what I ought to be interested in. I bought a house recently, and clearly that means I need lots of info about life insurance, credit cards, burglar alarms, yard service, and the place offering dance lessons in my neighborhood. I couldn't care less about any of those things.

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    21. Re:Questions by ortholattice · · Score: 1
      First of all, HR 2391 doesn't make it criminal to "skip commercials".

      Well, I suppose it depends on who's doing the interpreting. The MPAA can afford a powerful legal battle.

      According to the Wired article:

      However, under the proposed language, viewers would not be allowed to use software or devices to skip commericals or promotional announcements "that would otherwise be performed or displayed before, during or after the performance of the motion picture," like the previews on a DVD.
      Anyway, that was enough to prompt me to send off this letter:

      Dear Senator xxx:

      I am writing to express great concern about Bill HR2391 (Intellectual Property Protection Act).

      One of the provisions of this bill will make it illegal to skip over commercials or promotional material, for example on a DVD. This is simply outrageous. I am shocked, in disbelief that there even exists a bill with such an absurdity. What I choose to do in the privacy of my own home is nobody else's business.

      Do honestly believe that if you were to ask people you represent whether they want a law making it illegal for them to skip commercials, that any less than 99% of them would say NO?

      There are other provisions of this bill that are also troubling, in the sense of more government and industry intrusions into our private lives.

      Who do you represent, the people who elected you, or the industry lobbyists that are trying to buy your vote? The invasion of big corporations into our private homes is getting totally out of control.

      PLEASE DO NOT FORGET THAT YOU REPRESENT THE PEOPLE. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST BILL HR2391.

      Thank you.

      Sincerely, (me)

    22. Re:Questions by david.given · · Score: 1
      if an increasing number of people (many in educated and financially stable demographics) have the capability to avoid ever seeing any advertising, what, exactly, makes it worthwhile for advertisers to continue paying for it, at least at the same levels?

      Obviously, nothing. This is a classic example of technological developments making a business model obsolete. Advertisements only had value because people were forced to watch them. Now they're not, and so they don't have value any more.

      This is a good time to haul out that hoary (but accurate) Heinlein quotation about profits.

      This technology is not going to go away. Legislating against it is just stupid, and will be just about as effective as Prohibition. The only winners are going to be the ones who come up with a workable alternate business model.

      How about actually paying for the content? That's how the BBC is funded here in the UK, and it works pretty well. Or you could pay on a more direct basis, although that lends itself rather less well to a broadcast medium: I would love to be able to pay a subscription and have an episode of, say Stargate arrive every week. Preferably on DVD, through the mail. That way I can watch it when I want to watch it.

    23. Re:Questions by froody · · Score: 1


      If the entire TV industry is predicated on advertising, and the idea of advertising is predicating on paying to have as many people see your ads as possible (and the payment is proportional to proven amounts of people who may be watching), if an increasing number of people (many in educated and financially stable demographics) have the capability to avoid ever seeing any advertising, what, exactly, makes it worthwhile for advertisers to continue paying for it, at least at the same levels? You are choosing to watch content whose creation and delivery is funded in large part by advertising revenues. What funds it if that model is completely broken?


      Who cares about the TV industry? What inherent right do they have to make a profit using their existing model? It used to work, but is becoming obsolete fast. If TV is no longer profitable, they should find something else to do. Adding more laws (we have too many already) is not a good solution.

      Tim

    24. Re:Questions by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "It's meant to disallow technologies that bypass commercial and advertising content explicitly (such as things like the commercial skip features of old which skipped all ads, regardless of length, and returned you to the programming, or features that simply delete or auto-skip ad content altogether), but it won't prevent good ol' "fast forward" and 30 second skip features from working, nor will it make their use, even for commercial content, "criminal".

      I think a larger questions is, "Why are we passing laws to protect an old, business model?" If a business model, which granted, has worked for a long time, starts to fail...why are we making laws to preserver it? Shouldn't the market dictate what survives and succeeds? Laws didn't create the advertiser driven television market...it just evolved that way. We should allow the market to evolve with new technology, not legislate the old ways into stone. A law forbidding the technology to skip commercial automatically, implies that one is obligated to watch them in the first place...when did THIS EVER become an obligation or requirement for media consumption? Just because it has been around for so long doesn't mean it should be assumed to be a contract between the media producer and consumer...

      To even think of this being put into law is scary...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    25. Re:Questions by wagemonkey · · Score: 1
      The next thing (I fear) is pop-up ads for TV - you're watcing Homer walk into Moe's Bar and a window pops-up in the program advertising Bud (or whatever).
      Or they could try overlay ads - you have a translucent ad superimposed on the real program - anybody fancy seeing a ghostly car salesman on top of SG1 fighting their way back to the Stargate?
      If the ad and the program are intermixed you have to watch one to see the other. It could be done at the station so that syndication would still work the same.

      There may be too may lawyers, but there are way too many admen.

    26. Re:Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      People have become so immune to it

      Nice to think, but it isn't true. In fact, there are volumes of evidence that shows "people" never get immune to advertising. I know, you're smart. You make all purchasing decisions based on facts filtered through your giant brain. Marketing has no effect on you, especially when you are in one of these wonderful, ad-free countries. But advertisers spend money because it's effective. Marketing, brand management, and advertising are not voodoo.

    27. Re:Questions by Eric604 · · Score: 1
      Personally, I never realised how much we get bombarded with until ...

      same thing here. In the past I hardly noticed the banners on webpages until they started popping up and even refusing to close. Suddenly it bugged the hell out of me. I close popups without even looking at the content, sometimes after visiting a site a few times it becomes apparent the popup isn't an ad at all :(

      With firefox i have a normal life again.

    28. Re:Questions by Dotnaught · · Score: 1

      HBO and PBS offer all the TV worth watching. If the rest of the industry shrivels and dies, maybe Donald Trump will go back to private life.

    29. Re:Questions by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      When you've got 25 million subscribers providing advertising-free TV for £120 a year is pretty easy... it's just the way the maths work (and also why allowing people to 'subscribe' rather than using the license fee wouldn't work, as if you lost half the subscribers you'd have to double the proce to make up the shortfall, which would in turn reduce the number of subscribers etc.. you'd end up paying Sky prices (£480 a year for a load of cheap US imports).

    30. Re:Questions by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      If the advertisers don't figure it out, you'll see less money flowing to the TV networks and, a potential reduction in TV show budgets. Now, wouldn't THAT be a disaster! Those overpaid actors and network executives would start losing money.

      Surely creative destruction means they'll probably switch to a subscription model. The advertisers will switch their advertising to places where more people will see them. Either that or TV will be replaced with a Video on demand system (something which I believe would already be making money if the studios weren't so hung up on piracy concerns).

    31. Re:Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yeah right..

      i think you got something else than SSRI from your doc.

    32. Re:Questions by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1
      But advertisers spend money because it's effective. Marketing, brand management, and advertising are not voodoo.

      Yep. Companies aren't stupid enough to spend billions on something that doesn't work. Clearly, advertising is something that pays off. I try to avoid ads as much as possible, and since I don't watch TV, I've cut out most (I hope...).

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    33. Re:Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, HR 2391 doesn't make it criminal to "skip commercials".

      It's meant to disallow technologies that bypass commercial and advertising content explicitly (such as things like the commercial skip features of old which skipped all ads, regardless of length, and returned you to the programming, or features that simply delete or auto-skip ad content altogether), but it won't prevent good ol' "fast forward" and 30 second skip features from working, nor will it make their use, even for commercial content, "criminal".

      I have every right to use a smart commercial skipper that will figure out when the actual content starts again and take me to that point. The government has no place saying otherwise.

      However, it's the implementation that is the concern. If the law is *interpreted* to mean that even things like fast forwarding through commercials are inappropriate, well, then we have a problem. But that is NOT the intent nor the purpose.

      No, we still have a problem even if the law only bans "smart" commercial skipping tools.

      On the subject of TiVo and placing banner ads during fast forwarding, and the general idea of *automatic* ad content skipping/deletion:

      Which, incidentally, I don't actually have a problem with; like any product, you can choose not to buy it if you don't like it. People who don't like the banner ads will either tweak their TiVo to remove that feature, use a competing "off the shelf" product, or build their own far more powerful PVR using software like MythTV.

      If the entire TV industry is predicated on advertising, and the idea of advertising is predicating on paying to have as many people see your ads as possible (and the payment is proportional to proven amounts of people who may be watching), if an increasing number of people (many in educated and financially stable demographics) have the capability to avoid ever seeing any advertising, what, exactly, makes it worthwhile for advertisers to continue paying for it, at least at the same levels? You are choosing to watch content whose creation and delivery is funded in large part by advertising revenues. What funds it if that model is completely broken?

      Not my problem; the government has no right to mandate that we continue to support a business model if it is no longer working. In a real, non-governmentally-protected market, people have to continue to come up with (gasp) *new* ideas in order to survive.

      Incidentally, I find it equally abhorrent that these companies pay a fee to the government to be a monopoly in a region (and for that matter, actually pass that fee on to the customer).

      Relevant quote:
      "There has grown up in the minds of certain groups in this country the notion that because a man or corporation has made a profit out of the public for a number of years, the government and the courts are charged with the duty of guaranteeing such profit in the future, even in the face of changing circumstances and contrary to public interest. This strange doctrine is not supported by statute or common law. Neither individuals nor corporations have any right to come into court and ask that the clock of history be stopped, or
      turned back." -- Life-Line, Robert Heinlein

      Sure, your cable/satellite bill can, but only to a point. There are billions of dollars that come from advertising. Is there not that side to this story as well?

      No, there isn't.

      Note again that I don't actually have a problem with the particular change reported in this news item, other than that it reconfirms my decision not to buy a TiVo, and to build my own PVR that will be entirely under *my* control. I do however have a huge problem with your notion that businesses are somehow entitled to the perpetuation of their business model, or for that matter that th

    34. Re:Questions by IronChef · · Score: 1

      You are choosing to watch content whose creation and delivery is funded in large part by advertising revenues. What funds it if that model is completely broken? ... How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?

      This isn't about "how and when" it is OK to advertise, how and when it is OK for the consumer to choose to not view ads.

      If Tivo is relegating traditional ads to the technology graveyard along with buggy whips, the industry's response should be to find some clever way to keep making money... not to get laws passed that protect their outdated asses.

      How can you defend an industry that is trying to criminalize its own consumers?

      (Maybe it should become illegal to have a car with over some specific amount of electrical energy stored on board--so that gasoline production is protected. There are billions of dollars that come from refining gasoline. Is there not that side to this story as well?)

      If the failure of advertising funded television is on the horizon, let it fail, and let something else grow to take its place.

    35. Re:Questions by elhaf · · Score: 1

      Fear? This happens already. They advertise the next program during (on top of) the current one, and Homer does walk into Moe's Bar to advertise MasterCard (d'oh). Product placement is well-entrenched in prime-time TV as well. Whenever you hear a trademark mentioned by name, it was paid for. Frankly, I don't mind this trend at all; I always thought it sounded contived when they had to make up a brand name or say "Cola" generically when everyone says "Coke". Do away with commercials altogether and have the characters using the products in a non-intrusive way, and I'm good to go. On the other hand, if commercials are interesting enough, I will watch them. What's the SuperBowl for, after all?

      --
      Six score characters.
      Brevity being wit's soul
      I have enough space.
    36. Re:Questions by jargoone · · Score: 1

      i don't know. But anything is better than ads.

      I do know: money. Is you paying money better than ads? Do you think programming grows on trees? Do you think it's there because it's fun to make it? Do you have any idea how much it would cost you if there weren't advertising? I don't think you do.

    37. Re:Questions by Japong · · Score: 1

      On Canadian TV (Global) they already try and superimpose advertisements on the screen - I believe there is a specific dealbetween Canadian Tire and NFL football games, but I have seen others:

      • they put a CG Canadian tire blimp in the sky,
      • a CG Sprint Telepohne logo on the field (this also screws up often, with the logo being superimposed on top of the players, or panning along with the camera)
      • and I've even seen Lipton's ads being drawn over sections of fans, as if they're all holding together carefully placed signs above their head to make a picture of a giant cup of soup. It looks absolutely fake and horrible.

      I need to start carrying around a list of companies whose advertising policies annoy and disturb me, so I can remember who not to give my money to.

    38. Re:Questions by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      It's a law that says I can do a thing but I cannot have a machine that does that thing for me. WTF?

      That is not what the law says. You're misreading it just like virtually everyone else around here.

      It merely says that under certain conditions certain activities are legal. It doesn't say that there are not other conditions under which those activities are also legal. It doesn't make anything that is legal now illegal.

      All it does is 1) clarify that SOME stuff that is probably legal now is certainly legal, and 2) makes things that are illegal now certainly legal. Any exemption that can make things legal now, however, will remain in effect. Nothing is made illegal that is currently legal. Nothing.

      That said, the bill is very bad, but this one bit is actually the only saving grace. Ironic that people would waste time bitching about the good part due to a complete misunderstanding of it. I'm concerned that this will reduce the strength of protests over the bill.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    39. Re:Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a couple of details to complicate your view of things.

      1) Just because people have the capacity to skip all commercials doesn't mean they will. This assumes all commercials are of no value or at least of considerably less value than the programming they interrupt. However, a friend of mine records JUST THE COMMERCIALS during the Super Bowl, then invites us all over to watch the Super Bowl commercials the next day. I have to tell you it's great entertainment--and you don't have to deal with the damned Super Bowl!
      2) There are more ways to advertise than commercials. Yanking all commercials IN NO WAY yanks all advertisements. Take for example the profusion of commercial logos at Nascar and other sporting events. Or product placement in TV shows and movies. Or "informational" news stories about fabulous new technologies on your local news station.

      Frankly "this will kill TV" is a gross (and inaccurate) oversimplification. "This will change TV" is more accurate. Some of us like the change, and some don't. That's substance of the argument.

    40. Re:Questions by Feynman · · Score: 1

      Hey . . . you watched Frontline last night, didn't you?

    41. Re:Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for clearing that up, it looks like slashdot has been spreading FUD again.

      Funny how slashdotters hate it when Microsoft exaggerates things and lies, but have no problem doing it themselves.

    42. Re:Questions by Surt · · Score: 1

      Guess what. Money comes from somewhere. Decrease the cost of products by the cost of ineffective advertising, and spend that money on programming instead.

      It's cutting out a middle man, which will actually make the whole economy more efficient.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    43. Re:Questions by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      Hey . . . you watched Frontline last night, didn't you?

      Somebody else watches that show? That makes two of us.

    44. Re:Questions by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > If the entire TV industry is predicated on advertising, and the idea of advertising is predicating on paying to have as many people see your ads as possible (and the payment is proportional to proven amounts of people who may be watching), if an increasing number of people (many in educated and financially stable demographics) have the capability to avoid ever seeing any advertising, what, exactly, makes it worthwhile for advertisers to continue paying for it, at least at the same levels?

      Advertisers could start askign themselves why people avoid their advertisements maybe?

      A very good start would be to make sure they stop annoying the hell out of people, and they might even (gasp) try makign something that is sortof worth watching (because it is beautiful, funny, educative or whatever)

      > You are choosing to watch content whose creation and delivery is funded in large part by advertising revenues. What funds it if that model is completely broken?

      THen a new model has to be found? It is really not the first time in human history that a model that worked for a while stops workign ebcause technology catches up with it.

      > Sure, your cable/satellite bill can, but only to a point. There are billions of dollars that come from advertising. Is there not that side to this story as well?

      They have no right on this income. If they can't make it then they can't make it, big deal.

      If people are not going to get their soap and other TV junk adn they really want it, they may be prepared to pay for it directly.

      > Additionally, I've seen people here and elsewhere say they actually wouldn't mind "advertising" for products and services they're actually interested in - but at the same time, people argue against giving anyone the data needed to do exactly that kind of targeted advertising as a violation of privacy.

      Oh?

      Its not so difficult really.

      How about... advertise tech products on a tech website or around a tech related tv program for example? Or in other words, ensure advertisements that are presented around/before/after certain content fit in with that content?

      No need for tracking, no need for privacy invasion, and you do get targetted advertisement.

    45. Re:Questions by baalz · · Score: 1

      Yes, the end of a lot of business models are in sight due to recent advanYes, the end of a lot of business models are in sight due to recent technological empowerments of consumers. Trying to sweep back the tide with laws and artificial limitations is an exercise in futility. So your question as to what takes the place of ad revenue is the million dollar question. Anybody with half a brain can come up with some ideas, but the clever guy who figures out a new business model that works well given the current environment is gonna make bank, and promptly be imitated by the rest of the industry. Just because the crazy idea of giving content away and making money on the side effects in a certain format has worked so well for so long doesn't mean it can or should continue to work. What took the place of ad revenue when pop up blockers became main stream? What took the place of subscription revenue when people started getting their news from the net instead of the newspaper? Cry me a river if mediocre sit-com stars can no longer get 10 million dollars an episode because the consumer has got other options now.

      As far as Tivo placing adds on the screen, there is nothing morally wrong with it, the consumer is just getting less value from their service, assuming their attention is worth something.
      ces in consumer technology

    46. Re:Questions by kingj02 · · Score: 1
      So, my question is, what takes the place of the advertising revenue? How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?
      iTV. I think it'll eventually goto a pay-per-view for all content. You'll have your cable subscription fee, but that'll only give you the ability to then pay $0.99 to watch the morning news.
      --
      Ardente veritate incendite tenebras mundi
    47. Re:Questions by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      They don't have to welcome it, but they should have no recourse if it happens.

      They don't have a right to have people see thier ads. Once the person buys the paper, they are free to cut out the ads with whatever means available, be it scissors, or special glasses that block ads.

      What "content producers" want is legislative recourse when people block or skip ads. That's bullshit, and strikes at the heart of property rights. Intellectual property "rights" shouldn't trump real tangible property rights our entire economy is based on.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    48. Re:Questions by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      "I'd pay more per channel for cable if it had no advertising, no problem. Note I say per channel -- as in a la carte. Since I watch 2 or 3 channels via my TiVo I would probably end up paying less overall, but the channels whose services I use would be getting more."

      You do realize that when cable first came out it was advertised to not have commercials?.. ~30 years later cable is back with commercials and now you'll pay more to have no commercials? Heh.

    49. Re:Questions by rmarll · · Score: 4, Funny

      Totally off topic...

      Funny that in blocking the ad's for "internet accelerator" I've accelerated my connection speed far more than their product ever will.

    50. Re:Questions by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 1

      The total amount of advertising-loaded time during each show will rise.

      And since people obviously want to avoid the ads, they will then stop watching the show until the ads are reduced to acceptable levels. If they do lower their levels, great, I'll start watching again. If not, I don't NEED tv to entertain me, it's an attractive option sometimes, but not necessary. I'll do something that doesn't annoy me.

    51. Re:Questions by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      make that 3.

      watched the Afghan documentary afterwards as well.

    52. Re:Questions by Omestes · · Score: 1

      MMMMmmm... Soma. Soma always seemed like a nicer, happier, alternative to Prozac. And Prozac, or its ilk, doesn't do much unless you actually have a seratonin imbalance, so it wouldn't work on the populance at large.

      I thought that reality television is the Soma of the modern age. Though commercials can be seen as a form of brain control, being that it seems that our whole society is geared around raising a nice complacent populance, who will watch and be quickly swayed by thier cheesy psychosocial gimicks.

      I risk ranting, and have lost my ability to mod. Drat.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    53. Re:Questions by Macrolord · · Score: 1

      Newspapers are not fed to us in a serial fashion. They are effectivly random access depending on which page you start on. To a limited extent they try to get you to skip around by having articles spread across multiple pages.

      I can skip all the ads simply by not paying attention to them and reading the article.

    54. Re:Questions by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1
      Television, especially broadcast television is considered a public resource.

      I think people forget this too much. The question isn't what right do we have to watch, it's what right do *they* have to broadcast! The answer?...only if it serves the public interest. *Not* solely for their private gain.

    55. Re:Questions by merdark · · Score: 1

      I do know: money. Is you paying money better than ads?

      YES. Things like satillite radio are proof people would rather pay money than listen to ads. People also pay money for things like Tivos to avoid ads. Also, the whole idea that without ads things would be more expensive is not always true. For instance, movie theatres never used to play ads. They still made a profit. Yes, the SAME movie theatres that operate today.

      Why ads? Greed. Now the theatres are making *more* profit. Still charge the same price, yet also get money from ads. These days, more often than not, ads are used to supplement already profitable things. The argument that they reduce consumer costs is only true for fledging startups like the new VOIP companies.

      Do you think programming grows on trees? Do you think it's there because it's fun to make it? Do you have any idea how much it would cost you if there weren't advertising? I don't think you do.

      The answers to all your questions: yes.

    56. Re:Questions by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1
      [S]ince people obviously want to avoid the ads, they will then stop watching the show until the ads are reduced to acceptable levels
      You're assuming that the current ad levels aren't acceptable -- the fact that people still watch TV shows that to be false. You may stop watching TV, but that's not the point.

    57. Re:Questions by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      In the case of TiVo, it appears that they will now have pop-up ads.

      Sure, but in the case of Tivo the money is going to Tivo, not to the stations themselves. Tivo is more akin to Gator in attaching popups to other people's content. (They're not like Gator in other ways, of course).

      Why do people have so much trouble understanding this? TV stations sell advertising air time to pay for content. This stuff costs money.

      There's no good alternate except for "embedding" products into shows, or doing sponsorships a la "Pat Boone's Chevy Showroom". Hallmark often does the same with their "Hall of Fame" series, one of which included showing Schindler's List in its entirety with no commercial interuptions.

      Tivo isn't creating a revenue stream for stations, just for themselves.

    58. Re:Questions by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      They do that in the states as well though perhaps not as extreme. They will place logos on the field during breaks of action. There are also blue screens that I noticed behind the catcher in the world series. With certain cameras you could catch part of the screen and see that it was blue. When it switched back out to a different camera, you could see the ads. I didn't find it intrusive and it didn't bother me that much.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    59. Re:Questions by RalphSlate · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The point is that if I want to attach a device to my television that translates every third word into Algonquin once the signal comes into my device it's none of their business.

      This brings up an interesting legal point; would a company legally be able to design a TV set that replaced network commercials with its own commercials? It could conceivably give the TV sets away because it would make serious money on advertising.

      And could it use your very same argument that the user is choosing to replace the network ads with the alternative commercials?

    60. Re:Questions by Severious · · Score: 1

      For those of you who want to know, the addblock and flashblock are extensions you need to install, they are not part of Firefox by default.

      Flashblock
      http://flashblock.mozdev.org/
      Addblock
      https://update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php ?application=firefox&id=10

      --
      Tinfoil hat? Naa, I long since replaced it with a reinforced titanium alloy.
    61. Re:Questions by workindev · · Score: 1

      Their revenue stream and rights to artistic integrity end when they reach the consumer. At that point it's my signal in my device and as long as I don't rebroadcast it they need to leave me the hell alone.

      That's not really the point, though. You cannot expect the right to watch TV programs that are funded by advertising dollars while at the same time refusing to watch the advertising. At some point the advertisers will not be willing to pay for it any more, and there will not be anything left to watch. It costs money to produce and broadcast TV programs, and the only way people are going to spend money on it is if it is worthwile to them. We can make it worthwile by either lending our eyeballs for a few seconds, or paying out the nose for our cable bill.

    62. Re:Questions by ms139us · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Their revenue stream and rights to artistic integrity end when they reach the consumer. At that point it's my signal in my device and as long as I don't rebroadcast it they need to leave me the hell alone.

      While IANAL, I suspect that if you engage in activity that breaks their business model, they are well within their rights to exclude you from their business.

      Movie theatres usually lose money on movie tickets and recover the money from the concession stand. Theatres can (and do) legally restrict patrons from bringing in their own food.

      Some websites (slashdot?) give away the web service and make money from advertising. Some websites can (and do) legally restrict bots from their site.

      The list goes on and on...

    63. Re:Questions by Geckoman · · Score: 1
      What about newspapers? Sure, you can argue that newspaper ads aren't "intrusive", in a time-dependent way, but would a newspaper or its advertisers welcome a service that made it free or easy to eliminate all ads, and keep the other content, while still keeping the newspaper cost at 50 cents?
      We call those things "scissors" where I come from. It is 100% legal to buy a newspaper, take it home, and cut out all the ads before reading it. It is not legal to open a newspaper box, remove all the ads, then put the ad-free papers back in.

      Tivo is much more similar to the first example than the second. Tivo is not preventing you from watching all the ads you want, they're just giving you the scissors to use as you like.

    64. Re:Questions by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, although I wasn't around when cable first came out, I've heard tales of greatness where there were no commercials.

      I think, if you compare the production quality levels, shows produced nowadays will always cost more (even accounting for inflation) than shows produced 30 years ago. Therefore, I am willing to pay more for them to come without commercials, yes.

      Of course, you're talking to someone who buys TV shows on DVD (widescreen, no interruptions, watch when I want, etc). Unfortunately, by the time they make it to DVD, they're already well past deciding whether or not they're going to renew a series, so my purchasing it won't help support the actual show. Bummer. ;)

    65. Re:Questions by theskipper · · Score: 1

      "dancing midgets throwing pickles at a naked woman"

      I'd actually pay to see that.

    66. Re:Questions by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      You cannot expect the right to watch TV programs that are funded by advertising dollars while at the same time refusing to watch the advertising. At some point the advertisers will not be willing to pay for it any more, and there will not be anything left to watch

      But nobody should consider free-broadcast TV to be a "right". The issue is not so much the expectation by viewers that TV should be free, but the expectation of tv broadcasters that viewers should be forced to watch the commercials. It's all well and good to point out that the business model depends upon advertiser support and that an effective means of obliterating commercials could very well destroy that business model; but I maintain that broadcasters seeking to mandate commercial watching (or prohibit commercial skipping) through force of law are totally in the wrong. If they need to change their business model to subscription based we certainly have no right to complain, but when they go to the feds and make it illegal for us to buy a machine that skips commercials, that's totally unacceptable.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    67. Re:Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could conceivably give the TV sets away...

      GIVE THEM AWAY?!? Are you crazy? That would reduce our bottom line, and we just can't have that.

    68. Re:Questions by ijlaln · · Score: 1

      The FCC disagrees with you on your ability to choose what you do with that content - that's exactly what the broadcast flag is all about. Ars Technica has a good summary . The gist of it is that the FCC wants to regulate the devices used for viewing programming as well as the actual broadcasts. They argue that we won't get high quality digital content until they protect the interests of broadcasters and content owners. Your interests aren't so high on that list, I would guess.

    69. Re:Questions by rabel · · Score: 1

      I TiVO'd it and haven't seen it yet. That's still legal, right? What is it about?

    70. Re:Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Movie theatres usually lose money on movie tickets and recover the money from the concession stand. Theatres can (and do) legally restrict patrons from bringing in their own food.

      They own or lease the property

      Some websites (slashdot?) give away the web service and make money from advertising. Some websites can (and do) legally restrict bots from their site.

      The manner in which websites push and clients pull the data is remarkably different than a TV signal. Sites with metered access can end up paying out per visit. This may have some equivalencies to cable, but certainly not TV over the airwaves. I'm no engineer, but if I turn on my television and point the rabbit ears, do I suddenly soak up bandwidth that prevents my neighbor from being able to do the same?

      The notion that a business has the right to exclude you, should they choose, has a nice common sense ring to it. I just think it should vary depending on what is consumable.

    71. Re:Questions by koick · · Score: 1

      >What does that do for the Advertisers? Well, they better figure something out

      Oh, they'll figure something out all right, it's called advertising *during* the show. Notice how those TV network bugs are getting more and more animated and pervasive on the screen?

    72. Re:Questions by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      When I visit a web server, or visit a theatre (private property) they can attempt to restrict what i do.

      I use Mozilla. I don't see ads in Slashdot. Should slashdot just restrict all Mozilla and Firefox users?

      When I visit a theatre, I'm on their property.

      When a broadcaster sends me a signal, they have no idea whether I'm watching the commercials or not. I might have to go to the bathroom. Or I might have a device that skips commercials. Which of these I am doing within the walls of my home is none of their damn business.

      You talk about the broadcasters' rights. It is perfectly within my rights to not watch commercials. The means I use to skip commercials is none of the broadcasters' business.


      I suspect that if you engage in activity that breaks their business model, they are well within their rights to exclude you from their business.

      If their business model is broken, that is not my problem. I'm also not quite so sure that they can exclude me if I'm not doing anything wrong. For instance, "all you can eat" really should mean "all you can eat". If they give away an iOpener thinking that I will probably subscribe to their overpriced internet service, to find out that I just keep the hardware, that is their own stupidness. Ditto for CueCat. Similar if they SELL me (and the substance of the transaction is a sale) a "disposable" digital camera, and I convert it into a reusable camera and keep it, that is also not my problem. (See precedent in Adobe software bundling case where Judge said if the transaction looks and smells like a sale, then it is a sale. I can then separately re-sell the components of the bundle, just like I can sell you the headlight off my car.)

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    73. Re:Questions by Moofie · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? The "right" to watch TV programs?

      I have a "right" to do basically whatever the hell I want to. They have a "right" to do basically whatever the hell they want to. Where their "rights" end is when they think they can force me to watch their advertisements.

      I absolutely DO have the right to watch TV programs, and ignore the ads. I signed no contract. I have no obligation. They freely put the content into my TV, and I can freely watch what I choose. Or not.

      Their business model (or failure thereof) is not my responsibility.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    74. Re:Questions by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "While IANAL, I suspect that if you engage in activity that breaks their business model, they are well within their rights to exclude you from their business."

      Not if they're using my (our) airwaves.

      I am free to break whatever business models are broken by my free actions. They are not free to force my compliance with their business model. They certainly are free to stop broadcasting if it's no longer in their interest.

      I'd love a la carte cable, or subscribing to the (maybe two or three) TV shows I actually like. That's never going to happen, though.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    75. Re:Questions by blazin · · Score: 1

      So I'm not the only one who has that dream. Except the midget part...

    76. Re:Questions by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      what's a "newspaper"?

    77. Re:Questions by chgros · · Score: 1

      TV stations sell advertising air time to pay for content.
      I'm afraid TV stations actually try to make content to keep people in front of the TV for commercials.

    78. Re:Questions by Le+Marteau · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With the rise of SSRIs, people won't get enough. They'll just go on with life and 'not worry' about their rights being taken away.

      I doubt it. I've been on Prozac for about a year, and I've never been more pleasantly furious about the state of society. Just look at my posting history ;^]

      SSRI's have enabled me to be HAPPY about being UNHAPPY with things. That sounds like a joke or a contradiction, but it's the truth. I now gleefully go about in iconoclastic, anti-social ways, happily slicing and dicing simpletons with my rapier wit, all the while singing a happy tune. I now can get all righteously indignant and enjoying it as if it were a walk in the park on a sunny day, rather than before, when I would find the whole thing, well, depressing.

      Contrary to what you imply, the drug has made me a happy, contented misfit and has helped kick me out of society's patterns. I am, at the same time, more discontented with society, more vocal, more active in political causes, more independent, and pleased as punch about the whole situation.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    79. Re:Questions by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      You're giving reality TV too much credit.

      IMO we are Rome, TV + drugs are our bread and circuses, and the muslim extremist terrorists are the Goths come to sack the Empire.

    80. Re:Questions by workindev · · Score: 1

      If they need to change their business model to subscription based we certainly have no right to complain, but when they go to the feds and make it illegal for us to buy a machine that skips commercials, that's totally unacceptable.

      I agree that this should not be a matter of law, but I don't think that is what we are talking about here. This story is about Tivo placing ads on the screen while you are fast forwarding through commercials, not laws against skipping commercials.

      Broadcasters have every right to do all they can to get you to watch commercials, just as you have every right to do all you can to avoid watching them. But my basic point is that once enough people figure out how to avoid commercials, we will end up having to pay for TV another way. It isn't free.

    81. Re:Questions by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Of course, but that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about a law making something illegal, not companies refusing service.

    82. Re:Questions by -=Zak=- · · Score: 1

      I'd pay more per channel for cable if it had no advertising, no problem. Note I say per channel -- as in a la carte.

      The whole problem with a la carte for cable is that if you like watching CBS, it'll be cheap because LOTS of people will pay for CBS. But if you like watching FoodTV or something, there are much less people willing to pay specifically for that channel, so it'll likely either be much more expensive or not available at all.

      Without a la carte, the channels you are currently paying for and not using are subsidizing the channels you like but nobody else watches.

      -Zak

    83. Re:Questions by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      I sure as hell can, because my ToS with Time-Warner Cable says nothing about agreeing to watch advertising. I pay for them to put a signal into my home, if they subsidize the signal with ads, that's their problem. If I don't watch the ads, they can't do anything about it.

      If businesses decide ads aren't working and they stop running them, the cable company can feel free to change their rates, then I can decide if I still want their service.

      Y'all act like HBO doesn't put out Grammy winning shows. Shows that, unsurprisingly, are BETTER than shows on regular TV. Shows with NO COMMERCIALS. You just have to pay for the channel if you want to pay for it. Digital TV should make that easier, there are channels I'd subscribe to, and channels I don't give a flip about. I don't NEED a hundred channels when I currently only watch 20. I KNOW I only watch 20 because that's how many different channels I have a show set to record on MythTV, which I currently use to time shift shows, as well as watch them without commercials.

    84. Re:Questions by workindev · · Score: 1

      I have a "right" to do basically whatever the hell I want to. They have a "right" to do basically whatever the hell they want to. Where their "rights" end is when they think they can force me to watch their advertisements.

      Nobody is forcing you to do anything. There is no ad police that will force you to watch a banner ad while you are fast forwarding your tivo.

      I absolutely DO have the right to watch TV programs, and ignore the ads. I signed no contract. I have no obligation. They freely put the content into my TV, and I can freely watch what I choose. Or not.

      Correct. However, broadcasters are only going to provide those TV programs if they can also make a profit. They don't "freely" put content into your TV, it costs them a lot of money to do it, and the only reason they are doing it is because their customers (the advertisers) have the expectation that their ads will be seen. Once that expectation is gone, there will either be a drastic reduction in the quality and quantity of TV, or you will end up paying for it another way.

      Their business model (or failure thereof) is not my responsibility.

      Ah. The classic Slashdot argument. Just because somebody charges (either money or time) for something that you happen to want for free, you think you have the right to take it anyway and blame it on their "business model".

    85. Re:Questions by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Well, if others didn't like the shows I like, I wouldn't go and ask them to pay for them anyways. That's the system now and my choices are either "all" or "none" (basically), which isn't really fair to them.

    86. Re:Questions by metamatic · · Score: 0

      Cable companies already subsidize their revenue stream by replacing network TV ads with their own ads. That's why you see lots of Dish ads if you have Dish network, lots of Comcast ads if you have Comcast, and so on. So I don't see that there would be any insurmountable legal hurdles to a TV manufacturer doing it. (IANAL.)

      On the other hand, didn't a spyware company get sued for replacing web banners with other web banners?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    87. Re:Questions by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "Ah. The classic Slashdot argument. Just because somebody charges (either money or time) for something that you happen to want for free, you think you have the right to take it anyway and blame it on their "business model"."

      Nonsense. Just because they think they should have the force of law behind their business model, I think they can go screw.

      Broadcast TV is free now. My eyeballs are free to watch it or not. TiVo is free to strike whatever business deals they want, and I'm free to tell them to go screw. That's not a big deal.

      Writing laws that prevent manufacturers from making hardware that consumers want to buy is, by and large, wrong.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    88. Re:Questions by workindev · · Score: 1

      I sure as hell can, because my ToS with Time-Warner Cable says nothing about agreeing to watch advertising. I pay for them to put a signal into my home, if they subsidize the signal with ads, that's their problem. If I don't watch the ads, they can't do anything about it.

      If businesses decide ads aren't working and they stop running them, the cable company can feel free to change their rates, then I can decide if I still want their service.


      I guess I should revise my original statement to "You cannot expect the right to continue to watch TV programs that are funded by advertising dollars while at the same time refusing to watch the advertising".

      You are right, they can put ads in the middle of shows, they can put ads on your Tivo while you are fast forwarding, and they can put tricky product placements in the show, but they can't force you to watch it. If more and more people avoid advertisements, broadcasters will have to change the rates they charge viewers, and you can bet that there will be people who find that unacceptable.

      Y'all act like HBO doesn't put out Grammy winning shows. Shows that, unsurprisingly, are BETTER than shows on regular TV. Shows with NO COMMERCIALS. You just have to pay for the channel if you want to pay for it. Digital TV should make that easier, there are channels I'd subscribe to, and channels I don't give a flip about. I don't NEED a hundred channels when I currently only watch 20. I KNOW I only watch 20 because that's how many different channels I have a show set to record on MythTV, which I currently use to time shift shows, as well as watch them without commercials.

      What is the going rate for HBO nowadays? About $10/month? If all channels in your standard digital TV package charged a similar price for commercial-free programming, TV bills would be pushing $1,000 per month.

      I would love to see some kind of ala cart system where you could pick and choose specific commercial free channels from a broad range of choices (not just movie channels). It would be great if we could pay for exactly what programming we wanted without having to get a bunch of other channels thrown in the mix.

      As advertising becomes less effective, it will be interesting to see how the TV business evolves.

    89. Re:Questions by workindev · · Score: 1

      Writing laws that prevent manufacturers from making hardware that consumers want to buy is, by and large, wrong.

      I agree 100%. This article isn't about writing laws, though, it is about broadcasters and Tivo teaming up to try and get more ads in different places so there is a better chance that they will be seen. There is no law requiring Tivo to display banner ads while you fast forward through commercials.

    90. Re:Questions by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Seems to me, that's the advertisers' problem, not the customer's.

      It's like my strategy for buying computer games: I wait until they've been out 2-3 years, then buy them for $10 or less from the bargain bins. If all customers did this, I doubt if the game companies could continue in business. Does that make what I do immoral?

      To a large extent, I think advertisers have already done a lot to keep people looking, in that they've made TV spots far more appealing and entertaining than they used to be. Sometimes a Target ad, with its music and pretty girls, is better than the show that it's sponsoring.

    91. Re:Questions by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Couple this article with the law discussed the other day where TiVo will not be ALLOWED to circumvent commercials.

      Sure, they SAY it's only for automated commercial skipping hardware. What happens when they decide the 30 second skip is "too automatic"?

      TiVo can put whatever banners they want on the screen. It's one more reason for me to resent the hell out of them charging for monthly data downloads. No, I'm not a TiVo customer, nor do I plan to be.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    92. Re:Questions by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Your experience was definitely different from mine, then.

      I spent 5 years on Paxil. I was a completely different person. I embraced the mainstream, I loved conforming (I saw it as the ideal way of life, to be part of something), I stopped being creative, and I was a consumerist yuppie pig.

      Not to mention that I had all the sexual side effects, which ruined that part of my life.

      I have a legitimate low-grade mental illness, so I need an anti-depressant medication to be functional. I dropped Paxil (cold turkey - talk about withdrawal, I doubt heroin is as bad) and tried Prozac, which just made me lethargic. Then I switched to Wellbutrin, and I have my personality back. I'm able to create again and things that are supposed to piss me off, do. The things that make me happy make me happy like they're supposed to. When I was on Paxil, it took over my life. Wellbutrin just treats my illness.

      Another thing to note... I did not have a single successful relationship with the opposite sex when I was on SSRIs. I rarely dated and when I did it turned into disaster. When I switched to Wellbutrin, something in the change in my attitude caused my success level with women to skyrocket. I'm married now and couldn't be happier about it.

      Sorry to sound like a Wellbutrin ad.. I just wanted to assure you and anyone else that might be reading (yeah, right) that I'm not talking out of my ass when I talk about SSRIs.

      One positive thing that Paxil did for me was it let me experience happiness, and now that I look back on it, I believe that was for the first time. Now, I know the state of mind that I want to be in, and I can go find it on my own without throwing my identity away with SSRIs.

    93. Re:Questions by bnenning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The classic Slashdot argument. Just because somebody charges (either money or time) for something that you happen to want for free, you think you have the right to take it anyway and blame it on their "business model".

      Bull. Broadcasters are not charging me anything. They are *hoping* that I actually will watch the commercials, but their desire imposes no legal or moral obligation on me. Just like my credit card company hopes that I won't pay off my balance every month; I suppose I'm stealing from them when I do?

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    94. Re:Questions by workindev · · Score: 1

      Seems to me, that's the advertisers' problem, not the customer's.

      In the TV business, the advertiser is the customer, and we (the TV viewers) are the product. The customer pays good money to get our eyeballs in front of their ads. It is not unreasonable for broadcasters to take steps to make sure the product they are offering is worth it to their customers so that these customers continue to give them money.

    95. Re:Questions by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      ... and they wonder why people like me quit buying DVDs and just download them instead.

      Seriously, I have many DVDs already that won't let you skip past the crap at the beginning. They lock out my skip button and I have to wait for it.

    96. Re:Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But my basic point is that once enough people figure out how to avoid commercials,
      > we will end up having to pay for TV another way. It isn't free.

      Yes, but TV with commercials is not free either.

      You can try to "freeload" on TV by buying no-name beverages, but if you are in the market for e.g. a new car, you probably will not find a brand that does not indirectly make you fund "free" TV via car commercials.

      Now, what good is a law that basically rips off car buyers without a TV-set ?

      You could argue that well-off consumers that spend more on branded products subsidize TV for poorer people, but given the typical TV commercials, I am not really sure about this.

      Especially for broadcast TV that uses (or wastes, in my view) a scarce common resource like bandwidth, I do not see any moral reason why the user should not do whatever pleases him with the signal.

    97. Re:Questions by sudog · · Score: 1

      It's not acceptable for products to be advertised if I'm not interested in watching said advertisements, I never buy said products if I recall advertisements for them, and feel that my own brain is private and should be protected from intrusive brainwashing mechanisms of successful advertising campaigns.

      If it doesn't work, then let the broadcasters die. Legislating away technology people want to use will simply piss them off. Some dumbass telling me I'm not allowed to completely eliminate memory-altering advertisements from what I watch on television? Screw you! I'll do it anyway.

    98. Re:Questions by dynamo · · Score: 1

      > So, my question is, what takes the place of the advertising
      > revenue? How and when is it acceptable for products to be
      > advertised?

      1. Replace advertising as a whole with small human and/or computer search-engine based agencies serving the _customer_, hired by the customer for a fee to cover their account overhead, to find and provide them with useful links to products they like. Their data source is the web, where companies and ratings organizations may put any true or false information they want to. The better agents will produce better matches for their clients because they are better at judging what is good for them and cutting through the bullshit on the net to the useful facts. They would also be better at analyzing those facts and applying them to the knowledge of what is desired by their clients.

      Natural selection, market forces, lots of hand-waving, and ... presto - an advertising-free market of many independent agencies with varying reputations to remove from the consumer the difficulties of shopping.

      What is to stop those agencies from taking kickbacks, providing template reccomendations, etc.. - sucking as an industry? Well, nothing. But many free ones would develop, being computer run by open source types. And they would be less likely to be biased (especially if the source is open.)

      2. Without advertising, who pays the bills for content? The viewers. Cable selection ala-carte is the best example in real life, but per-show would be ideal. I'd prefer to see a DRM system with global play-tracking controlling the output of some 3rd-party managed content fund that came out of taxing the surplus out of companies that shouldn't need those advertising dollars anymore (to, for example, gain the favor of the agencies). Or better yet, I'd like my iVideo player to send an anonymous digital cash payment over an anonymous proxy of my choice in exchange for the key to unlock secured content on a digital video file of the show I want to watch. If I paid even 10 cents per hour, I'd be willing to watch about the same amount of TV I do now and if I could prepay on the video player I could limit my watching to a set amount of time - something I wish my TV could do by itself.

    99. Re:Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if everyone stopped watching commercials, the companies would have no reason to advertise in that medium any longer. If they are no longer advertising on TV, where does all that money go? Do sales drop so far that they can't support themselves? Do they have enough brand recognition to continue on without advertising? Will they give the money to their employees, who then could afford better health care, or to spend more, kicking the economy in gear?
      hmmm ... wishful thinking, I'll bet.

    100. Re:Questions by noscule · · Score: 1

      Agreed - there'd have to be some level of coercion involved.

    101. Re:Questions by mikehunt · · Score: 1

      > If I write a module for MythTV that allows me to change all the commercials in my LiveTV programming into mpegs of dancing midgets throwing pickles at a naked woman...

      Oh please! Please...

    102. Re:Questions by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but keep in mind part of the cost of HBO is the size of their consumer base, and the cost of the movies they pay for.

      Just for fun, I decided to figure out what my "paid tv" might be worth to me
      1002 WLFL (WB) $3
      1003 WRAL (CBS) $3
      1004 WUNC North Carolina Public TV (Free)
      1006 | WNCN (NBC) $3
      1013 | WRAZ (FOX) $3
      1025 | USA Network $5
      1030 | The Discovery Channel $5
      1033 | Lifetime $5
      1035 | Discovery Health $5
      1036 | Comedy Central $5
      1039 | The Learning Channel $5
      1040 | SPIKE TV $5
      1048 | VH1 - Video Hits One $7
      1049 | Sci-Fi Channel $7
      1053 | MTV - Music Television $7
      1056 | The History Channel $5
      1062 | E! Entertainment Television $5
      1071 | FX Networks Inc. $5
      1077 | Home & Garden Television $5
      1078 | Food Network $7

      Using arbitrary numbers from my own head
      4 "Basic" = $12
      10 "Special interest" = $50
      4 "Premium" = $28

      $90 is what I'm basically willing to pay for higher quality commercial free TV, if it was offered. With economies of scale, they could probably drop those numbers to be what I'm paying now. I think the real reason it won't happen is because some people only get cable for a few channels, so I'm forced to pay for some guys Golf channel while they get stuck with my FX bill

  9. Best way to avoid commercials by roman_mir · · Score: 1, Insightful

    is to stop watching the television. I moved to my new app. and decided not to buy a TV and in about 1.5 years I haven't watched a single TV commercial.

    1. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 1

      Same here. I haven't watched TV for about 2 years and I don't miss it at all. Well Southpark, but I'll get the DVDs instead.

      Seriously, anything I need is on the Internet and more. Broadcast flag, TiVo shenanigans, MPAA, etc. Fsck 'em all and just don't watch I say.

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
    2. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by suso · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used that app for a while too. We didn't have TV for the last 6 months up until this fall. It was nice and my wife and I got a lot of other stuff done, including starting a business. Its amazing what TV sucks out of you. We turned it on again so that we didn't overwork ourselves. Its good to have a break now and again.

      I've been tempted to buy a Tivo, but I don't want to dedicate that much to watching TV.

    3. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, if a Tivo has the same effect as a VCR, it makes you actually watch less. Because, after all, you have it on tape, so you can always just watch it at a later time ... at least that's my experience.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by suso · · Score: 1

      And like most inventions that let you put things off. You end up never watching it at a later time and scrambling for a blank tape the next time.

      My dad has hundreds of VHS tapes of programs that he will never end up watching. Maybe %10 of them, but not even close to half of them. What a waste.

    5. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by snark42 · · Score: 1

      And you can skip all the time wasting commercials until they make it illegal. Watch what would have been a 60 minute program in 45 minutes or so.

    6. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1
      I have a PVR and we actually watch less TV than we used to.

      We only watch shows we've pre-recorded; I never channel surf anymore, the kids rarely do.

      If I have nothing recorded the horror of watching "normal" TV is too much to bear so I can't channel surf anymore.

      We watch shows in 3/4 the time (West Wing -- 42 minutes instead of 60).

      The kids come home from school, do their homework, watch the two shows they recorded from yesterday and turn off the TV.

    7. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by wibskey · · Score: 1

      Didn't I read an article about you here

    8. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      stop watching the television.

      Looks like we have a perpetrator of un-American Activities in our midst. Quick! Somebody trace his IP address and somebody else call the Department of Justice!

    9. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by mavenguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just over four years here.

      Whenever I get stuck in the vicinity of a blaring TV set (e. g., waiting room) I become very uncomfortable; it feels to me as if I were being pounded on, the absolute worst being daytime shows like low brow talk shows featuring low class idiots and corresponding commercials (used cars, bad credit, shysters, plugs for other idiot shows, etc.)

      I bring something to read, but if I can't find a quiet place to sit, I might have to consider bringing earplugs.

    10. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by jxyama · · Score: 1

      isn't it sort of like preaching abstinence to avoid unplanned pregnancy/hiv/aids/vd? yeah, it works and pretty much everyone knows it but it really doesn't address the meat of the issue being discussed.

    11. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      aah, actually it does. I don't watch TV so this problem is not a problem.

    12. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by jxyama · · Score: 1

      right, but you know that most people do watch TV, don't you?

    13. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that? I don't know if most people out of 6*10^9 can afford a TV.

    14. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by jxyama · · Score: 1

      i assume you are just in mood to play a game, right? this is a /. story (geez, a computer and internet... what are those?), catering to u.s.-centric readers/posters, discussing issues related to tivo, an american company...

  10. So Ridiculous by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next announcement: It will be a criminal act to get up and take a leak while the commercials are on.

    1. Re:So Ridiculous by Evangelion · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Well, the PS2 Eyetoy has show that it's possible for a small camera to track your head movements.

      So what could happen in the future is that the camera could be used to track whether or not you're actually watching the commercials or not, and charge you more for each commercial that you get up and take a piss during.

      If you don't want to use the camera at all, that's fine, but you'll spend more on your service compared to someone who watches all commercials.

      Just thinking out loud here. I'm sure someone will come up with this, and decide to offer it :)

    2. Re:So Ridiculous by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1

      I've seen really creepy patent applications for systems that show you adverts which you get paid to view, and which use tracking devices to make sure you are actually watching them.

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    3. Re:So Ridiculous by mbsurf · · Score: 1

      There goes beer and football!
      Now we'll need timeouts...

    4. Re:So Ridiculous by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I think most advertising is ridiculous anyway. Every ad I have ever seen which hasn't influenced my decision about a product has been wasted money. By this point in my life that's been thousands of dollars, multiplied by the number of people that saw the ad, hundreds of billions of dollars. I don't know about you but most of the decisions I make about products is not based on air time bought by a corporation. A friend's referral is almost certainly #1, and I very often refer friends to things. I sometimes see a commercial and think "That's a good commercial", but I just don't care about the product.

      Overall I think commercialism is a giant sham. It inflates the price of what you want to buy with the benefit of showing you things you don't want to buy with shiny lights. Advertising is so expensive that a product in any market could survive on the basis that it doesn't advertise, but costs considerably less than the competition. People will randomly try the product after happening to notice it. If it's up to the quality of the competition, they will refer other people to the product.

      Another group of commercials are those that try to convince people that they want something that they simply don't. This is just a downfall of capitalism to which I don't have anything to say.

    5. Re:So Ridiculous by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yes, home fashion pundits are claiming that the new living room furniture (in the U.S., anyway) will be procelain and include plumbing.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    6. Re:So Ridiculous by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      What?! The FCC is mandating automatic restraints be installed on all new recliner chairs? I must stock up on legacy hardware ...

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    7. Re:So Ridiculous by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      It will be a criminal act to get up and take a leak while the commercials are on

      Thus causing sales of Depends to skyrocket.

    8. Re:So Ridiculous by DickBreath · · Score: 1
      It will be legal to get up to take a piss if you have Microsoft AdVer-EYE-zment implants installed.

      These convenient implants constantly project subtle advertisements, logos, contests, prizes, giveaways, and other valuable offers onto the retina of your eyeballs.
      • They are FREE!!!!
      • They keep you constantly updated with valuable information
      • They make it safe and legal for you to get up and go to the bathroom during commercial breaks.
      As an added bonus, whenever you see or hear any copyright content, the implants offer the convenience of automatically charging your credit card without any effort on your part. You can feel safe and assured that your are paying for only the copyright content that you see and hear.

      Microsoft AdVer-EYE-zment implants offer the kind of value, stability, security and quality that you've come to expect from the Microsoft name.
      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    9. Re:So Ridiculous by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Yeah yeah yeah. Anyone you ask will say the exact same thing. And yet it's definitely well established that advertising works. Perhaps we're just having ourselves on a wee bit?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    10. Re:So Ridiculous by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I can literally not think of a single thing I got because of an advertisement. I came to this school because I found it by my own accord. I built my computer from scratch by my own searching. None of the websites I frequent came from an advertisement. None of the clothing I wear, food I eat, products I used came from advertising. I don't have a single piece of clothing with a logo of any sort on it. My shoes cost me $9. Pretty much I try what's on sale on a whim, and if I like it, I stick with it.

      Yes, overall advertising works, however not very well. As I stated, every dollar spent reaching me has been a dollar wasted. Now if I look hard enough I might be able to find a thing or two where I initially was brought onto the product by an advertisement, but for every product that I bought on my own, they wasted money.

    11. Re:So Ridiculous by G-funk · · Score: 1

      If your shoes cost you $9, then nobody's spent a single dollar trying to show you advertising. They don't care about you. They're not paying to show ads to you, they're paying to show ads to someone with AU$220 nikes. If you see some ads as well, then they're happy. But they're definitely not for you.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  11. Make sure you don't cause a backlash by stecoop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tivo should be careful. As I imagine more people will become interested in messing with the software in TIVO as it does run Linux. Example, on the major Tivo boards, they don't talk about subscription stealing because Tivo threatened legal litigation over such discussion - fair enough. But if Tivo Corp goes too far than there will be a backlash and people will go just as far. People would (and some do) install a larger drive, hack the advertisement feature, re-add 30 second skip and while messing with it mid as well get a free subscription to boot.

    I don't really want to see Tivo go down the tubes but I can imagine that the development community would pick up the charred remnants and actually produce a better product.

    1. Re:Make sure you don't cause a backlash by koreth · · Score: 1
      more people will become interested in messing with the software in TIVO

      So the percentage of severely-hacked systems in TiVo's subscriber base goes from 0.5% to 0.8%. Big deal. The vast majority of their customers wouldn't know a shell prompt from a hole in the ground and will never hack anything. The vast majority of their customers on Slashdot may be a different story, but TiVo has been targeting the mass market more than the techie early-adopter crowd for a long time now.

      As for free subscriptions, well, those of us who paid up front for lifetime subscriptions, or whose subscriptions are covered by a DirecTV premium package, have no motivation to ever do that. And even if we did it just out of boredom or curiosity, it wouldn't cost TiVo a dime.

  12. Avoid ads or save time? by Covener · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd think most peoples' motivation is to save the time of viewing commercials, not because of some aversion to advertising.

    I'd think as long as the banners don't make the ffwd through commercial slower (by assuring they're on the screen for some specific time) people won't mind.

    Better for the marketing folks to pay tivos electric bills then us.

    1. Re:Avoid ads or save time? by fname · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I own 2 TiVos and I could not agree more. I fast forward through commercials to save time, nothing more nothing less. As long as I can still fast-forward through them, what's the big deal?

      The submitter's hysterical comments show an obvious distaste for this decision by TiVo, but his statement, "although it might help them in the short run it will most certainly backfire in the long run," displays a profound sense of arrogance; he knew about this for about 10 minutes before drawing a conclusion based on nothing more than gut, while TiVo Inc., has clearly thought about these issues and decided they were a net benenfit. I would like to know how the submitter became so "certain."

      This has nothing to do with your rights or online, or Your Rights Online, it's a business decision no worse than Apple papering NYC with iPod ads. Get over yourself.

      [good thing I have karma to burn]

    2. Re:Avoid ads or save time? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Sure. I'll sit and watch a commercial once if it's for a product I'm interested in, but after that I honestly don't need to see it again.

      Tivo has the opportunity to do some actually-useful targetted advertising, but the inflexibility of the device along with the constant threat that they'll remove a useful feature to please some entertainment group makes it a less-than-viable choice for me. I fully intend to build a MythTV PVR next year so I don't have to constantly worry about Tivo fucking up the service.

      Fortunately for Tivo, I am not an "average" consumer.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    3. Re:Avoid ads or save time? by GTIChick · · Score: 1

      I admit it - I'll actually rewind to see a "good" commercial, like the "Happy Jack" ad for the H2. And think of the more memorable Super Bowl ads! If more commercials offered entertainment value, I wouldn't feel like I had wasted 2+ minutes sitting through them, waiting on the show to start again.

      --
      "Show me on the doll where the bad man touched you."
    4. Re:Avoid ads or save time? by babyrat · · Score: 1

      The submitter's hysterical comments show an obvious distaste for this decision by TiVo, but his statement, "although it might help them in the short run it will most certainly backfire in the long run," displays a profound sense of arrogance; he knew about this for about 10 minutes before drawing a conclusion based on nothing more than gut, while TiVo Inc., has clearly thought about these issues and decided they were a net benenfit. I would like to know how the submitter became so "certain."

      The submitter stated his opinion that this would backfire in the long run. You stated your opinion the TIVO inc has clearly thought about these issues. You'd like to think so, but often times decisions are skewed by external factors. Now the net benefit you speak of may be as simple as "we're screwed if we don't change something, so maybe this will work, even if we really don't think it will". ie the last ditch effort, hail mary, or whatever you want to call it.

      You are right that it has nothing to do with Rights at all - I don't remember any inalienable right to be able to watch tv without commercials, or even just plain watch tv.

    5. Re:Avoid ads or save time? by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      The submitter's hysterical comments show an obvious distaste for this decision by TiVo, but his statement, "although it might help them in the short run it will most certainly backfire in the long run," displays a profound sense of arrogance; he knew about this for about 10 minutes before drawing a conclusion based on nothing more than gut, while TiVo Inc., has clearly thought about these issues and decided they were a net benenfit

      You can't really go by that, either. You can't trust that the decisions that companies make will be prudent ones. There might not be an acceptable answer to the problem they're in. Enron decided that the actions it took were the right actions for the company. SCO decided that suing everybody was the right action for it. A utility company in Montana decided that the best thing it could do is sell off its assets and become an internet provider in the dot com boom. It dot bombed.

      Companies still go out of business, there isn't always an easy answer that gets them out of the hole that they're in. Sometimes the only hope left is to try something drastic.

      My point is that the company does probably know something that we don't, but you can't always expect good news out of it. Maybe the company knows it's in trouble and it has to do something out of desperation. As an example, a Hobby shop near my house suddenly changed into an arcade which seemed very strange to me. A month later it was out of business. I don't think changing to an arcade caused it to go out of business, I think they knew they were already in trouble and they had to take drastic measures to get some revenue. That didn't work and they went under.

      A company that is stable and profitable doesn't need to make drastic changes to its business model. Once you see big changes like this, a shakeup is in progress and they're acting desperate to survive.

    6. Re:Avoid ads or save time? by fname · · Score: 1

      I agree with almost everything you said, excpet for the last paragraph. Drastic changes don't always indicate that a company is desperate to survie; Microsoft turned on a dime (well, silver dollar) in 95-96 to capitalize on the internet. They may have been desperate to continue domination, but they were not desperate to survive.

      2nd of all, I don't think TiVo has made any "drastic changes to its business model," rather it has decided to try and add another revenue stream. That's just smart business.

      My main point is that in practice, this whole thing will probably be unintrusive & I doubt any viewers will be bothered by it. As long as the fast-forward button still works, is there any objection that doesn't essentially rely on, "but it's the principle of it!"

    7. Re:Avoid ads or save time? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Does TiVo phone home about users' viewing habits? If so, it might provide decent realtime feedback about which ads people actually pay attention to.

    8. Re:Avoid ads or save time? by dmorel · · Score: 1

      I'd think most peoples' motivation is to save the time of viewing commercials, not because of some aversion to advertising.
      I have an intense aversion to advertising. It's not just the time I'm saving, it's the crap that I'm not seeing. Being told I'm a "good" dad because I took my kid to eat a McDonald's hamburger or bought some crappy ass brand of peanut butter or GASP went to Disneyland is an insult and genuienly makes me angry. Further, being told that NOW is the right time to buy a car for the 14th year in a row is a little frustrating as well. I do NOT want to see advertising. If I need something, I'll figure out what to buy, but I have no desire in being told what I SHOULD want every 15 minutes. Advertising is so pervessive today that it seems inescapable, but I will run from it until I am dead!

  13. Finally, something the UK will be glad not to get by angusr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It looks like we've finally found the advantage to being stuck with Series 1 hardware and 2.5.5 software. Almost makes up for not getting Home Media Option and all the other additional features...

  14. Well, TiVo's owners like it by jfengel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    TiVo stock was up 7% yesterday on no news whatsoever and another 4% today. (Where "no news whatsoever" means "already known through back channels to everybody on the rumor boards, as well as close personal friends of the executives.)

    So the people who own TiVo seem to think that this is a profitable idea. Not just "profitable" in the sense of "charging more" but profitable in the sense of "making more money total", i.e. revenue - customers lost - lawsuits.

    1. Re:Well, TiVo's owners like it by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      So the people who own TiVo [stock] seem to think that this is a profitable idea. Not just "profitable" in the sense of "charging more" but profitable in the sense of "making more money total", i.e. revenue - customers lost - lawsuits.

      Just because wallstreet thinks it is a good move does not necessarily make it so. In fact, with their track record, chances are the street is wrong. Share pricing, particularly of "bleeding-edge" tech which TiVo still is despite *our* longtime familiarity with it, is all about human psychology in the short term and value in the long, sometimes very long, term.

      I'm sure that a good number of TiVo unit owners do not share wallstreet's enthusiasm. Probably more people than wallstreet thinks too.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:Well, TiVo's owners like it by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      First, their is no proof that the jump in the stock was tied to this.

      Second, the stock market, at least in the short term, isn't about profits, it is about what people THINK the profits will be. It's more psychology than economics (not that they are that different to begin with)

  15. How to irritate a TiVo owner by waynegoode · · Score: 0, Troll
    Two things to say to irritate a TiVo owner.

    1. Why are you using the fast-forward button? Why not use the commercial-skipping forward button? What do you mean TiVo don't have one?

    2. Okay then, why not use skip-ahead 30 seconds button or random-access? Oh, TiVo doesn't have that either.

    This is why I have a ReplayTV. Actually, I have two of them. I can skip commercials with a single button press. This works 90% of the time. Also, I can skip ahead or back any amount or go any point in a program instantly. Plus, a lot more.

    Also, check out the ReplayTV forum at AVSForum

    1. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by syntax · · Score: 1

      TiVo does have a 30 second skip button -- you just need to unlock it.

      SELECT PLAY SPELECT 3 0 SELECT (you will hear three dings)

      Then 'skip to the end of this show' button turns into a 30 second skip -- but still works its previous match when used in conjunction with the fast forward button.

    2. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by Gannoc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay then, why not use skip-ahead 30 seconds button or random-access? Oh, TiVo doesn't have that either.

      Wrong.

      During playback, on your remote, press:

      Select - Play - Select - 3 - 0 - Select

      and you'll have 30 second skip on your tivo until it loses power for whatever reason.

    3. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Acutally, the best way to irritate a TiVo owner is to be an obnoxious troll like you seem to be doing.

      Fast forward works 100% of the time, which isn't even true of 30 second skip, which TiVo does have, and still most TiVo owners don't use it.

    4. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >SELECT PLAY SPELECT 3 0 SELECT (you will hear three dings)

      TIVO disabled this on newer models ;-(

    5. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by runlvl0 · · Score: 1

      2. Okay then, why not use skip-ahead 30 seconds button or random-access? Oh, TiVo doesn't have that either

      TiVo undocumented 30-second skip solution:


      Have a nice day, Replay-boy.

      --

      Carthago delenda est!
    6. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by tang · · Score: 1

      "Fast forward works 100% of the time, which isn't even true of 30 second skip"

      30 second skip doesn't work 100% of the time? 30 Second skip on a ReplayTv is just a button that skips 30 seconds. Whenever you hit it, it works. You may be thinking of automatic commercial skip. There are 2 ways to use automatic commercial skip on a replaytv that has it (the newer ones dont).
      1. Hit the commercial skip button on a recorded show. That doesn't just skip 30 seconds, that jumps to the end of that block of commercials.
      2. Have auto-commercial skip turned on.
      This way, you don't hit any buttons, it just skips the commercials.
      The automatic commercial skip feature is not 100% accurate, the 30 second skip button is 100% accurate.

    7. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by runlvl0 · · Score: 1

      2. Okay then, why not use skip-ahead 30 seconds button or random-access? Oh, TiVo doesn't have that either

      TiVo undocumented 30-second skip solution:
      SELECT PLAY SELECT 3 0 SELECT

      (Maybe I should 'preview' before I get a snarky 'tude.).

      --

      Carthago delenda est!
    8. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      30 second skip doesn't work 100% of the time? 30 Second skip on a ReplayTv is just a button that skips 30 seconds. Whenever you hit it, it works.

      I suppose you live in a magical world with commercial blocks that are multiples of 30 seconds long all the time?

    9. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I suppose you live in a magical world with commercial blocks that are multiples of 30 seconds long all the time?

      I do. I don't know how they do it where you are, but I'd expect them to sell advertising space in blocks of 30 seconds. Even if they have shorter blocks, they're most likely to do that by splutting up a 30 second block. It makes scheduling so much easier.

    10. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by tang · · Score: 1

      The replay autocommercial skip does not work based on commercials being 30 seconds long. The button does yes, it skips 30 seconds per push. Guess what, I live in a magical world evidently, because the correct number of 30 second skip pushes, always gets me from the start of the first commercial, to the end of the last one. Evidently commercials are in 30 second multiple blocks , atleast for the shows I watch. I am not a commercial expert, the reason I am not a commercial expert is, 90% of my viewing is done with the "autocommercial skip" feature, which means, I never see the commercials to count how long they are. The other 10% of the time, a few (usually 4, I guess I also live in a magical world where commercial breaks are 2 minutes or so) 30 second skips gets me right back to the show.

      Also, yes 30 second skip works 100% of the time. IT ALWAYS SKIPS 30 SECONDS. That is how It is defined as working.

    11. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      There are generally, at least on the broadcast networks, anywhere between one and three 5 second segments promoting other station programming in addition to the ads during an ad break.

    12. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, yes 30 second skip works 100% of the time. IT ALWAYS SKIPS 30 SECONDS. That is how It is defined as working.

      Always skipping 30 seconds doesn't always work as a commercial skipping method though. That's what really matters.

  16. Tivo and "My Rights" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Whoop de doo. So Tivo will put up ads when I fast-forward. Where is this involve my rights in any which way?

    Tivo is a company that makes a product which I choose to use. If you don't like this new feature, then stop using it or even complain to them.

    But slashdot has constantly elevated every minute case into a "rights" issue, it has minimized what a right really is. It's really shameless and deceitful of them to be doing this.

  17. Everyone chill out! by Slider · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wow, talk about overreacting.
    Do you really think Tivo is stupid enough to alienate its customers? If you read the article you'll see that this in no way interferes with skipping commercials. It basically expands the "press thumbs up for more info" tag that appears in the top right of the screen during some commercials and makes them more of a billboard size. This is actually a popular feature among Tivo users as you could say, get a brochure for the new Corvette sent to your home by simply pressing thumbs up during the Chevrolet commercial. I welcome this.

    1. Re:Everyone chill out! by SrJuanLobo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slider's totally right, CHILL OUT. 1. It's a great extension of an already implemented harmless feature. "Want more info? Press Thumbs Up?" 2. Tivo is just as much about time-shifting TV content, and buffering the live stream as it is about abbreviating commericals. 3. Even the most hardcore PVR user has on occasion, backed up to see a funny or compelling ad, so let's stop acting like commericial content is demon spawn that some in this group would imply.

    2. Re:Everyone chill out! by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      Of course they are! We are talking about money, here. Was Coke stupid enough to introduce NEW Coke, yes? Was Intuit dumb enough to introduce product activation in TurboTax, yes? There are many, many examples of corporations changing products for THEIR benefit, not consumers.

    3. Re:Everyone chill out! by hburch · · Score: 1
      Companies have a long history of building a good reputation, and then abusing that reputation when they focus on profit rather than consumers. I'm already annoyed by paid ads that cause the menus to constantly change. Learning the shortcuts has reduced my annoyance, but only because I use the menus less.

      Particularly with a company like TiVo, I have to ask: what causes costs to rise? They have more subscribers, sure. Presumably that should decrease the cost per subscriber. The move to network-based downloads should help you greatly as well, since phone connections are more expensive.

      They are nowhere close to saturated, so growth should still be possible. They are facing competition from cable and satellite DVRs, so they need to focus on being better or cheaper. Decreasing the customer experience may help with cheaper, but the article talked about not increasing the monthly fee, not reducing it.

      I purchased my first TiVo recently, and love the skip button. It has greatly increased my enjoyment watching television, to the point that I do not believe that I do not watch television without it. However, I decided to get the monthly subscription from TiVo, because I'm not sure they will exist in two years, much less that their service will remain desireable. If I drop TiVo, I'm likely to drop cable as well. It would be too painful to go back to watching television with all those commercials.

      If they cared about consumers, there would be a way to turn off the paid placements. If all these people love these placements, why would they turn them off? (Maybe there is a way -- if so, correct me so I will be able to better enjoy my TiVo)

    4. Re:Everyone chill out! by garcia · · Score: 1

      Do you really think Tivo is stupid enough to alienate its customers? If you read the article you'll see that this in no way interferes with skipping commercials. It basically expands the "press thumbs up for more info" tag that appears in the top right of the screen during some commercials and makes them more of a billboard size. This is actually a popular feature among Tivo users as you could say, get a brochure for the new Corvette sent to your home by simply pressing thumbs up during the Chevrolet commercial. I welcome this.

      I clicked on the thumbs up once during a commercial. I thought that the content provided was fucking dumb. Not only that but I thought it was really fucking annoying (and space wasting) that Best Buy Music, random commercials on Porches and Vettes appear on my menus, and I pay for all of this too.

      So, the thumbs up isn't a huge problem for me. I see it in the corner and I ignore it. If this fucking ad goes to a banner I'm gonna be really pissed. That 10 seconds that I'm burning through ads that I purchased a system to remove is going to annoy me.

      I will be calling Tivo today to express my disbelief in their actions and that they will quickly lose a customer if they go ahead w/this plan.

    5. Re:Everyone chill out! by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This is actually a popular feature among Tivo users as you could say, get a brochure for the new Corvette sent to your home by simply pressing thumbs up during the Chevrolet commercial. I welcome this.

      Perhaps your definition of popular is different than mine. The La Times article says

      Between 5% and 20% of TiVo viewers given the opportunity to "participate" in an ad -- either by clicking on a tag or by selecting a long-form commercial from a main menu -- take it.
      Put another way, 80 to 95% of the TIVO viewers don't care for the feature.

      In your dictionary, are "SPAM" and "popular" synonymous?

    6. Re:Everyone chill out! by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Wow, talk about overreacting.

      It's slashdot. What board did you think you were reading?

      Do you really think Tivo is stupid enough to alienate its customers?

      Yes. Slashdotters think everyone's stupid except for them.

      If you read the article

      You must be new here.

    7. Re:Everyone chill out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you really think Tivo is stupid enough to alienate its customers?"

      Yes. I have yet to see a single large company that gave a rat's ass about its customers. SBC doesn't care about alienating me with their offrnsive, arrogant attitude, nor does Ford with their exploding cars, nor does anybody else. These days everybody follows MS's way of doing things, never mind that they aren't monopolies.

      And the stupid cows just bend over and let the MNCs have their way.

      Fuck TIVO, I'll build my own damned TIVO.

    8. Re:Everyone chill out! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      Yes. Slashdotters think everyone's stupid except for them


      Actually, everyone's stupid, INCLUDING Slashdotters! :P
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  18. I have a new idea for a patent.... by mikael · · Score: 1

    The fast-forward screen-blocking filter - whenever this box detects that your remote-control is sending out the "Fast-Forward" command, it automatically blanks out a pre-selected portion of the screen and thus eliminating any unwanted video spam.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:I have a new idea for a patent.... by ideatrack · · Score: 1

      That's too specific, you should submit something like "press a button to perform a function". Though I suspect that's already registered to Microsoft. And is the perfect example of irony.

    2. Re:I have a new idea for a patent.... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Badly named. Name it "One-button-press-control" and you're set.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:I have a new idea for a patent.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better get cracking then. Since you just publicly disclosed it, you have 1 year to file. But don't bother with non-US jurisidictions since everyone else (except JP and CA) terminates your rights upon disclosure.

  19. MeedioTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    another alternative to TiVo/Replay/MythTV is MeedioTV. Meedio is the successor to myHTPC, which was great, and Meedio is even better. The TV portion (good feature set) is coming out of beta soon, I can't recommend it enough. http://meedio.com

    1. Re:MeedioTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    2. Re:MeedioTV by lucason · · Score: 1

      Seriously, why would I buy this when I've got MythTV?

  20. Sure by clinko · · Score: 1

    Doesn't really bother me, I just look at the time on the bar, when it hits 2 minute (3 minutes on some shows) you hit play.

    It's muscle memory at this point, I'll probably notice the pop-ups as much as I notice banner ads now.

    1. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...15 minutes if it's MTV

      (watching Beavis and Butthead in 1996 was painful because of that)

  21. The really sad thing is... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    that apparently the only way to avoid being whored out to advertisers is to use Free software. You'd think some company would keep their promises, but it seems that there are none that ethical left...

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:The really sad thing is... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Corporations don't have ethics. Ethics are not profitable. Corporations exist for profit only.

      As long as the entertainment industry keeps pumping money into Washington, it will be increasingly difficult to legally avoid being whored out to advertisers. Go hit opensecrets.org and see if you can find a single Congressman who didn't get at least 5 digits from some entertainment company. That should provide insight as to why these bills keep getting passed.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:The really sad thing is... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know -- I was just lamenting on how much it sucks.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  22. tv your way by rozz · · Score: 1
    TiVo will begin to place banner advertisements on your screen when you are fast forwarding."....
    This is ironic for a company whose slogan used to be "TV Your Way,"

    that makes perfect sense to me ... TiVo banners will be like, YOUR banners :)

    --
    "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  23. No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I possibly have seen this in action.

    Basically, as you are fastforwarding you spend 10 seconds watching commercial in fast mode waiting for them to end. What will happen is that instead you will see a 10 second regular-speed commercial.

  24. UltimateTV by Is0m0rph · · Score: 0

    If you have DirecTV I think Ultimate TV is still the way to go. You can pick receivers up on Ebay for as low as $25. Hard drive is easily upgradable to a larger one and you get 30 second forward skip, 10 second back skip, and the normal fast forward/rewind. Plus there will never be banner ads on it since they no longer make UTV receivers. I thought about changing my 3 UTVs out to TIVOs but when I looked at them I really wasn't impressed enough to spend $300 to change them out plus a commitment for a year's service (to get the $99 price) to DirecTV.

  25. Tivo - why did you bother? by Japong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know why anyone bothered with Tivo in the first place - the promise was of "TV Your Way", but TV my way has always been best served by Bit Torrent. It's quasi-legal to be sure, but I can get a 400 meg HDTV broadcast of one of the very few shows I do watch over TV, the commercials are nicely stripped (so I don't even have to fast forward them) and the service is fast and reliable, especially on third generation high-speed internet technology.

    If you're getting a TIVO, I'm assuming the moral issue of skipping the stations precious advertisements don't matter to you that much anyway, right?

    1. Re:Tivo - why did you bother? by Chris+Carollo · · Score: 1
      ...I can get a 400 meg HDTV broadcast...
      Actually you're getting a 400MB SD downconvert of the original HD source. Still a nice pristine digital source, and it's well-encoded, but it's not HD. HD sources for a hour-long show, minus commercials, are in the 5-8GB range if they're the original mpeg2 stream or re-encoded with Xvid in the 2GB range.

      That said, I love BitTorrent as well -- I no longer have to worry about two shows airing at the same time. Record one with with my ReplayTV and download the other. I'd be more than happy to do the same, for a fee, directly from the networks...but we're probably too fringe at the moment to be profitable.
    2. Re:Tivo - why did you bother? by drayath · · Score: 2

      Whatever you may think about the moral rights of downloading broadcast TV programs, i think you will find 'quasi-legal' is understatment. You are downloading copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright owner, which i think you will find is plain ilegal under US, Uk and probably all WTO signatury countries laws. (And no i doubt Betamax ruling to allow timeshifting would apply).

      Now if you think this should be permited, then start speaking to your political representative/Senetor/Mp etc. and convice them. Or even the tv people direct, particually for non-us residents there is probably quite a market willing to pay access to TV serises for P2P (for a reasonable sum) rather than never see them.

      I ts
      O bvious
      I m
      N ot
      A
      L aywer

    3. Re:Tivo - why did you bother? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      you obviously do not own a tivo. think what you want, but every single person i've ever talked to that owns a tivo raved and continues to rave about it. if you watch any TV at all, it's a must, and even for the $400 i paid for it 4 years ago.

      here's a news flash for you, many people do not have high-bandwidth connections that allow speedy leeching of massive mpeg files. say i watch 1.5 hours of TV in the evening. i have to log on to my puter and find them in bitorrent (sorry i don't use bitorrent, but i assume it is similar to other p-p protocols w/ similar clients), spend a few hours downloading them. even with my 1.5Mb DSL line, which is probably better than the average american, it's going to take me at least 1/2 hour to download the mpeg, assuming i can find it in zero time. so i have ot wait 1/2 hour to watch the program? then, you are assuming that i have an integrated multi-media system so i don't have to watch them while i sit in my computer chair. guess what? most people don't have an integrated multimedia systems.

      with tivo, it's all there. i simply turn on the tv and pick up the tivo remote. everything i want to watch is there waiting for me.

  26. Law Breaking by totallygeek · · Score: 1
    I've bought three TiVos in the past four years, but my next PVR will run MythTV -- unless HR2391 passes and makes me a criminal for skipping commercials.


    You are joking, right? Please don't tell me that you wouldn't run MythTV because it would violate the law. Do you not ever speed either?

    I figure that if I can still watching television hitting pause whenever I am recording to not put commercials on a VHS tape, it should be fair game if you figure a way to automate this. I can see a law being made, but unenforceable.

  27. 30 Second Skip by Grand · · Score: 1

    You can program your tivo remotes to instantly skip ahead 30 seconds. So when commercials come on, clicking it 4 to 5 times instantly gets you past the commercials and back to the show. No having to sit through sped up commercials. Hopefully they dont mess with that also.

  28. Actually, I think this is an EXCELLENT idea. by Theovon · · Score: 1

    When you fast-forward, the content isn't all that interesting anyhow. You're kinda watching it for visual cues to see when the ads are over so that you can then rewind slightly and continue watching your show.

    As long as the banner ad doesn't intrude on that in a way which makes is difficult to see what you need to see, who cares?

    Listen, TiVo needs to make money. They're a company selling a product. Everyone seems to forget that and whine when they don't give you everything for free. I applaud them for coming up with a way to sell ad space without interfering with normal use of the product.

    What would you rather have, no fast-forward, forcing you to watch commercials, or a fast-forward with a small screen overlay that you only have to look at for as long as you are fast-forwarding?

    1. Re:Actually, I think this is an EXCELLENT idea. by FroBugg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Listen, TiVo needs to make money. They're a company selling a product. Everyone seems to forget that and whine when they don't give you everything for free. I applaud them for coming up with a way to sell ad space without interfering with normal use of the product.

      Nobody's asking to get anything for free. TiVo already charges for the unit and you have to pay a monthly charge to just use the damn thing. If they want to add banner ads and give me the service free, that's great, but it's not what they're doing.

    2. Re:Actually, I think this is an EXCELLENT idea. by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      Which would you rather have, putting tons of advertisments of products on your apartment's walls or being homeless? It's not a duality. There are other possibilities.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    3. Re:Actually, I think this is an EXCELLENT idea. by mcc · · Score: 1

      Listen, TiVo needs to make money. They're a company selling a product. Everyone seems to forget that and whine when they don't give you everything for free. I applaud them for coming up with a way to sell ad space without interfering with normal use of the product.

      What people like you tend to forget is that while yes, they are "a company selling a product", the fact is that isn't any good unless people actually buy or use the product. Tivo may "need" to make money, but actually making money is a privilege, not a right, and we as customers are the ones who will ultimately decide whether Tivo gets this privilege. If Tivo or any other company does not provide what we want in the manner we want it we can and will go elsewhere.

      So you apparently don't have a problem with this commercial thingy. That's fine, that is your opinion. However, not everyone shares your opinions. Learn to deal with it.

    4. Re:Actually, I think this is an EXCELLENT idea. by furball · · Score: 1

      Companies changes rates now and then. Would you be willing to skip banner ads in exchange for a higher monthly charge?

      For Tivo, revenue is revenue. Either they get it from the banner ads people or they get it from you.

  29. Strayed off course by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    "You'll never see TiVo roll out any kind of intrusive advertising," [Davina] Kent[, TiVo's advertising and research sales manager,] says. "It's very core to our mission."

    It appears to me that TiVo has strayed off course of their mission. Pop-up banners while I am fast-forwarding is intrusive.

    1. Re:Strayed off course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please define "intrusive".

  30. Ohh, ohh! I know! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    You know those black bands you get when you watch a letterboxed movie?!!! They can sell banner ads the fill that wasted space!!! Technically, this should be minor to implement. Their customers (who apparently, are the media companies, not the people who actually subscribe to their "service") will love it!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Ohh, ohh! I know! by arodland · · Score: 1

      you really shouldn't have said that. "They" read Slashdot, you know.

    2. Re:Ohh, ohh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know those black bands you get when you watch a letterboxed movie?!!!

      Get a widescreen TV, those black bands tend to disappear.

    3. Re:Ohh, ohh! I know! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Not entirely. Most (all?) widescreen TVs are 1.77:1 (16:9), while most films are often 2.35:1. The black bands are a lot smaller, but they are still there...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  31. Doesn't matter by jbltk · · Score: 0
    if you use the 30 Second Skip Easter Egg

    I never sit on my couch without it.

  32. Jesus. Enough with misreading HR 2391. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    It IS a bad bill.

    But the part that gets all the attention -- the new exemption in 110 -- is actually good.

    It doesn't make anything illegal. Just the opposite: things that are illegal now become legal, and things that are of unsure legality become certainly legal. If something still doesn't fall within the scope of the new exemption, then NOTHING CHANGES. This is because the current exemptions that such things might fall under are left alone.

    So if skipping ads in time shifting is fair use now, and it doesn't fall into the new exemption, then it is still fair use -- if it ever was -- even if the bill passes.

    So if y'all want to bitch about 2391, that's great, but at least bitch about the parts that are in fact bad. (i.e. pretty much the remainder of it)

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    1. Re:Jesus. Enough with misreading HR 2391. by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "So if y'all want to bitch about 2391, that's great, but at least bitch about the parts that are in fact bad."

      I've got a better idea: maybe you could explain where in the Constitution the Federal government gets the power to tell people that they can or can't watch commercials?

    2. Re:Jesus. Enough with misreading HR 2391. by vicviper · · Score: 1

      Mods, please moderate parent as Informative/Insightful.

      Everyone else, if you haven't already, please read the proposed law.

      Section 110 can be found here:

      http://www.theorator.com/bills108/hr4586.html

      Lastly, whoever added the bit in the end of the summary about skipping commercials becoming illegal, please shut up.

    3. Re:Jesus. Enough with misreading HR 2391. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      This bill does NOT tell people whether or not they can watch commercials. You aren't understanding what it actually does.

      What it basically does is to say that edit decision lists for DVDs are legal to use and make and so forth where they don't block ads.

      It doesn't say that they are illegal if they do. Only that they are not legal under THIS exemption. Other exemptions that are applicable now are still applicable.

      If you understand a programming metaphor, think of an if statement:

      Currently we have if(fair use){legal};else(){illegal};.

      This merely adds another one so that we have if(new exempton){legal};elseif(fair use){legal};else(){illegal};.

      Clearer?

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    4. Re:Jesus. Enough with misreading HR 2391. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      A combination and loose interpretation of Article 1 section 1 and Article 1 section 8 clause 8.

      This of course assumes you mean that they get the power to do what they are trying to do in this law, and not what you may be implying about forcing people to watch something.

    5. Re:Jesus. Enough with misreading HR 2391. by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "A combination and loose interpretation of Article 1 section 1 and Article 1 section 8 clause 8."

      So "to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries", they're going to prevent people from skipping over commercials?

    6. Re:Jesus. Enough with misreading HR 2391. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, HR2391 doesn't criminialize timeshifting. However If HR2391 goes through, in order to timeshift, you will have to become a criminal.

      Sure, you'll have a fair use right to timeshift! However, in order to actually timeshift, you know, television, you'll have to circumvent broadcast technologies that-- oh gee-- it will be illegal to make a TV set which circumvents.

      It's like giving someone a box and saying "You have a right to the contents of this box! However, opening the box is illegal". Hmmm.

    7. Re:Jesus. Enough with misreading HR 2391. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Where the fuck are you getting that crap from?

      The new exemption doesn't even MENTION circumvention.

      If circumvention -- which is illegal under the DMCA, which is already law -- is distinct from copyright such that copyright exemptions like 107 don't apply to it, then this doesn't allow it either.

      If it is not distinct in that manner, then this would permit it just as 107 would.

      Please do not make shit up in the future. 1201 et seq are yet another thing that is bad. And they have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with this bill.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    8. Re:Jesus. Enough with misreading HR 2391. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      No, they're going to prevent equipment from automatically editing copyrighted works before display. And once again, I use this disclaimer that this is a loose interpretation.

      I'm not saying I like the law, but there's certainly an argument to be made for their power to enact it.

    9. Re:Jesus. Enough with misreading HR 2391. by bani · · Score: 1

      it does not matter if it is automatic, merely giving the consumer the ability to edit commercials out is prohibited by this bill. any software with the ability to edit commercials (intentional or not) is prohibited, which pretty much means any video editing software, period.

  33. If HR2391 passes, there are two solutions... by Timex · · Score: 1

    The two solutions are:

    --- Get rid of the TV. I don't see this one as very realistic, since the kids would completely freak out.

    --- Stick to watching VHS and DVD shows. This is more likely, since I don't watch much "regular TV" anyway.

    Leave it to the Marketing Union (if there is such a thing) to fsck things up. It's always got to be about the all-mighty dollar, doesn't it?

    --
    When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    1. Re:If HR2391 passes, there are two solutions... by deacon · · Score: 1
      --- Get rid of the TV. I don't see this one as very realistic, since the kids would completely freak out.

      So, you recognize that the kids are addicted to watching a piece of furniture, and that if this piece of furniture were "gotten rid of" they would complain.

      And your solution is to let this continue?

      With the studies showing links between

      toddler TV watching and ADD

      More aggressive behavior

      The stated intent of Corps to "BRAND" young people for life by the use of ads

      Obesity problem that spending hours sitting on the couch causes

      I would say that having the kids "freak out" will be the least of their problems.

    2. Re:If HR2391 passes, there are two solutions... by Timex · · Score: 1

      You're not just whistling Dixie, friend.

      I've managed the TV usage to certain programs and certain times of the day. I don't want the idito box on otherwise.

      When I was a kid, I spent more time out of doors than in. I'd like my kids to do the same. The problem is that these days, it's not as safe (if it ever was safe, anyway) for them.

      I'm moving soon, to a place with a back yard (we don't have one where we are now). There, I won't have to worry about the kids stumbling onto needles discarded in the grass, or drug deals going on in the parking lot.

      Yeah, we'll have cable, but the kids WILL be spending time outdoors playing.

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    3. Re:If HR2391 passes, there are two solutions... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      DVDs already have must watch commercials.

    4. Re:If HR2391 passes, there are two solutions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a minute to actually READ this bill. All it does is add an additional exception to the copyright law for devices that skip objectional material. All the restrictions about modification of the content already exist as law in title 17 and don't apply to you pushing the fast forward button. This is one of those cases of a clueless person that doesn't understand what he's reading making some nonsensical knee jerk claim on it followed by a million Internet sheep believing it without bothering to read the bill.

    5. Re:If HR2391 passes, there are two solutions... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      So, you recognize that the kids are addicted to watching a piece of furniture, and that if this piece of furniture were "gotten rid of" they would complain.

      Staring at furniture; terrible thing. My kids do nothing but watch the living room armchair all day... damn, you want to hear the noise they make if you try to take it away.

      Little bastards want me to upgrade the armchair to a leather sofa and have new cushions delivered every month. I was bloody furious... spoilt brats already have tables and wardrobes in their own rooms that they stare at until late at night, and *all day* on Saturday and Sunday.

      Dammit, when I was a kid, we didn't have *any* furniture... I had to visit my friend's house. He was lucky; his family had a footstool. I was always jealous. Tell that to kids today, and they'll laugh at you.

      Unbelievable.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  34. This will affect my viewing habits! by echocharlie · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I fast forward through the programming so that I can watch a cool commercial. How am I ever going to find my favorite commercials with a huge banner ad in the way?

  35. Wrong Business Model by Noksagt · · Score: 1

    TiVo better aggressively lower the price to consumers if they expect this ploy to work. They could adopt a model a'la some adware: it is extremely cheap or free to use if they can promise the advertisers your eyeballs, but you have the option to pay a higher fee in order to be ad-free.

  36. 3 TiVos in 4 years?? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    WTF is he doing with them? I know these things can be frustrating to use and the odd remote thrown at them is part of their life but 1 every 15 months?? I wouldn't want to be part of TiVo management if this guy ever goes to one of their shareholder meetings! :)

    1. Re:3 TiVos in 4 years?? by BaverBud · · Score: 1

      Who says he was replacing them?

      --
      Baver
    2. Re:3 TiVos in 4 years?? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Why would he need 3? The way he phrased it gave the impression he bought them for himself rather than other people.

    3. Re:3 TiVos in 4 years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two, and I don't even watch that much TV.

    4. Re:3 TiVos in 4 years?? by jamie · · Score: 1
      I bought a series 1 in 2000.

      Later, I bought a second series 1 as a gift for a friend.

      Then, I upgraded the series 1 to a series 2 in 2003. The upgrade means I basically bought a new series 2 at a slight discount, and then transferred the lifetime subscription from the first box. The original series 1 is on a shelf in the basement now.

      The hard drive on the series 2 is going bad and I don't feel like going through the hassle of replacing it. My plan is to put a terabyte file server in the basement sometime next year, for backup and general house data storage. By then a front-end MythTV box with a pair of good video import cards should be at a nice price point -- or at least, nice enough that I can justify spending more than I would on a comparable black-box, welded-shut, everything-encrypted, ripping-verboten, no-edit-points, hands-off TiVo.

      The remote will be the thing I miss the most... TiVo's remote is awesome.

    5. Re:3 TiVos in 4 years?? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      If you waste that much money on something you don't even really need then you're obviously paid too much.

    6. Re:3 TiVos in 4 years?? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      I know this is Off Topic, but I have a question:

      a terabyte file server in the basement sometime next year, for backup and general house data storage.

      General house data storage? What the hell kind of system are you running in your house? The Jamie Stock Exchange?

      I know of a Fortune 500 company that creates one Gig of data a day on it's ERP system. And, they are complaining that 1 Gig a day is far too much data. It would take them about three years (more or less) to fill up your terabyte system. OTOH, If you want, I could have them contact you, they are looking for disk space right now. :)

    7. Re:3 TiVos in 4 years?? by jamie · · Score: 1
      Total disk space in use among all the computers in the house is about 350 GB. I want centralized backup without having to worry about whether I have enough space. Granted, about 100 GB of that is existing backups, 50 GB is music that needs to be backed-up rarely, and another 100 GB is stuff I don't care whether it survives a disk crash or not, but that's still 100 GB I want periodic backups of.

      And being able to rip our DVD collection, to pick a movie without having to get off the couch and manipulate plastic objects, is strangely compelling.

    8. Re:3 TiVos in 4 years?? by irving47 · · Score: 1

      When did they start allowing you to transfer a lifetime subscription to a new box??

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
  37. Around? by lcde · · Score: 1

    Can this be away to get around yesterdays story?

    I

    --
    :%s/teh/the/g
  38. Agreed by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Allow me to begin by saying that I just purchased a TiVo less then a week ago. I actually netted it for a lousy $30 ($180 on Amazon - $50.00 promotional certificate - $100 mail-in rebate) figuring that I'd get the cheapest one and could always add a Hard Drive later (thanks to TiVo still being somewhat hacker-friendly).

    In one lousy week it has already changed the way I watch TV. Just the quick case in point: I didn't start watching Amazing Race until 9:45pm last night. By 11:30 I had seen both Amazing Race and Jon Stewart -- without watching a single commercial. That's 45 minutes of my life to do productive things (or surf Slashdot).

    Needless to say I will be the first one to cancel my service (after-all I only have a $30 investment) and stick pins into my TiVo voodoo dolls if they take the fast-forwarding away from me. What the heck would be the point of a DVR if they were to do that? I'd just go back to my VCR days.

    But if all they intend to do is place some advertisements on your screen while you are fast-forwarding then what exactly is the big deal? Did Jamie bother to RTFA before he went on his rant about switching to MythTV? To quote: "Kent says the advertising revenue will probably bring down the cost of TiVo to its 2 million subscribers -- currently $12.95 a month" So they sell some ad space (that I can just ignore for those 5-10 seconds I am FF'ing -- less if you use the 30 second hack) and my service becomes cheaper?

    Perhaps we should adopt a wait-and-see approach before we break out the torches and pitchforks.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:Agreed by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      $50 promotional certificate? How did you come upon that?

      Amazon was running some sort of deal where you'd get a $50 certificate good for anything on the site if you bought enough stuff from the electronics dept within a certain time interval. My company purchased a ton of digicams and related gear (CF card readers, etc). I used my own Amazon account for these purchases.

      I didn't even know about the promoation either. Got an e-mail with a code one day. Who is going to argue with that?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Agreed by Todd+Fisher · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps we should adopt a wait-and-see approach before we break out the torches and pitchforks.

      Let me be the first to welcome you to Slashdot.
      --


      --I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
    3. Re:Agreed by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps we should adopt a wait-and-see approach before we break out the torches and pitchforks."

      You don't understand. This is the first step (actually second or third) toward removing you FF. Or should I say the ability to ignore ads.

      Soon the ads will run continously under the content (like they already do sometimes) and in the content as well (product placement).

      You can complain now or later I guess. I prefer now.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    4. Re:Agreed by Arhat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps we should adopt a wait-and-see approach before we break out the torches and pitchforks.

      Annoyed at changes in policy with your TiVo service. We here at the Torches and Pitchforks, Inc understand your pain, that's why right now we are offering a torch and pitchfork combo deal for only $19.95. That's right, $19.95 for two must have mob items. Act in the next 15 minutes and receive a free noose. Don't wait, these items are going fast.

    5. Re:Agreed by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Bring down the cost doesn't mean the subscription will get cheaper, what it means it it will delay a future price increase. Since they will not raise prices as soon as they thought they would it will be a 'price cut'.

      Ain't corp account wonderful?

    6. Re:Agreed by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      I think he understands enough to know that he doesn't completly understand this move by TIVO. Instead of getting his patnies in a wad assuming that it will suck, he wants to see the result first.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    7. Re:Agreed by Knetzar · · Score: 1

      My Charter Cable DVR recently changed it's 30-second skip to a 15minute skip. I didn't mind that too much because I can still fast forward, but what really irritates me is that now some channels limit your fast forward speed to only 2x. What happens if I just want to see who wins on the World Poker Tour? Or if I just want to catch the end of a show I was watching live elsewhere? Since all I watch are old cartoons, WPT, and old sitcoms, I'll probably just get rid of my cable all together because of this.

    8. Re:Agreed by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      I guess it all depends on the ad format. My primary reason for using Google when it first came out was because it wasn't littered with banner ads. Even if Google's search function wasn't as good as Yahoo, I would still use Google because of the layout. Now I see MSN has ripped off Google's banner-free simplicity (though their search isn't nearly as good)

      All ads are annoying, but banner ads are the worst. I can picture fast forwarding with TiVO and this big banner is flashing "ClIcK HeRe To WiN YoUr FrEe IpOD!" or "NeEd ViAgRa? ClIcK hErE To ClAIM yOuR FrEe OnE YeAr SupPly!"

      I'll gladly pay more to have ad-free content, both online and on TV.

    9. Re:Agreed by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      Dish better not even THINK about pulling that kind of stunt.

      Grrrr. Maybe no TV is the way to go.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    10. Re:Agreed by ilyanep · · Score: 0

      That's 45 minutes of my life to do productive things (or surf Slashdot).

      This is another resounding endorsement for Slashdot as the procrastinator's tool of choice.

      --
      ~Ilyanep
      To get message, take amount of carrier pigeons at each stage mod 2. Then decode binary.
    11. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry - Anyone who thinks the price of something is going to come down because a company can generate additional revenue from advertising is clearly smoking wacky tabacy.

      Pricing is establish by the market - not by the revenue generated. The cable companies are trying to make a $5/month price stick and the tech savvy that put a PC based system together pay $0/month.

      Tivo is desparate to generate alternate sources of revenue because they do not have a unique product and their window of viability is rapidly closing.

      I have used Tivo as well as my Dish PVR and the ability to auto record based on an actors name or similarity to other programming just isn't worth $12.95 a month.

    12. Re:Agreed by jcoleman · · Score: 1
      I didn't start watching Amazing Race until 9:45pm last night. By 11:30 I had seen both Amazing Race and Jon Stewart -- without watching a single commercial. That's 45 minutes of my life to do productive things (or surf Slashdot).

      Or you could have not watched either show and saved the other 1 hour and 45 minutes of your life to do productive things that actually enrich your life, like reading a book or spending time with your family...I like the Daily Show as much as the next guy but let's face it, it's just "entertainment," and "reality tv" is really pretty useless - unless you're an advertiser.

  39. Series 1, oh yeah. by ayeco · · Score: 2, Informative

    I apologize for all my whining when I heard that TiVo was going to stop updating my Series 1 software. Now I'm glad I stuck with my old classic.

    Once again, our Series 1 value bounces back. I have a series 1 w/ network card, additional hdd, web interface, and lifetime service. You couldn't pay me to trade a series 2 for my series 1.

    1. Re:Series 1, oh yeah. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I took advantage of TiVo's offer to transfer lifetime service from a Series1 to a new Series2. Now I have Series1 units that I can use to do timed manual records without a subscription (with occasional maintenance) while the Series2 units will forever require a subscription to operate.

      I could stop giving TiVo money ($6.95 a month each for two Series1 units) and still have functional recorders.

      This is likely just repurposing their iPreview icons to use custom graphics. For those using external tuners, I suspect one could easily filter out the VBI and disable TiVo's ability to recognize this information. (A better filter would be scanline selective and avoid filtering out closed captioning.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  40. Doesn't make it "criminal" to skip ads by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

    First of all, HR 2391 doesn't make it criminal to "skip commercials".

    It's meant to disallow technologies that bypass commercial and advertising content explicitly (such as things like the commercial skip features of old which skipped all ads, regardless of length, and returned you to the programming, or features that simply delete or auto-skip ad content altogether), but it won't prevent good ol' "fast forward" and 30 second skip features from working, nor will it make their use, even for commercial content, "criminal".

    However, it's the implementation that is the concern. If the law is *interpreted* to mean that even things like fast forwarding through commercials are inappropriate, well, then we have a problem. But that is NOT the intent nor the purpose.

    1. Re:Doesn't make it "criminal" to skip ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Please stop astroturfing for the media companies.

      We all know that the interpretation of it will result in Tivo being sued, and the skip ahead button being nerfed.

    2. Re:Doesn't make it "criminal" to skip ads by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Christ, no. Stop saying that; it isn't true.

      The bill is very bad, but the new 110 exemption is actually good. It makes NOTHING illegal. It only makes some things legal that either might be now, or aren't at all now. That's it.

      So it disallows no technologies not already disallowed.

      Nevertheless, protest the bill. All the other crap in it is very very bad.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  41. Free HBO with ad banners by netsavior · · Score: 1

    I am glad someone is pioneering this, because I have always thought that Free HBO with ad banners would make executives and consumers smile. Now, the fact that people have to pay for tivo with ads is pretty annoying what are they AOL??

  42. Email Directv and Tivo by thealpha · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let them know that you are not pleased. I just sent a message to directv and will follow through with cancellation if this becomes reality. I have a PVR just don't use it because the Tivo is easy for my wife and kids to use.

    Here is a link to the Directv Feedback page,
    http://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/glb/Form_Feed back.ds p

    and a link to Tivo's contact page
    http://www.tivo.com/5.9.asp

    1. Re:Email Directv and Tivo by garcia · · Score: 1

      I called them and nicely spoke with a supervisor. The agents from Tivo had just been briefed of the situation today (not suprising as agents are always kept in the dark). My complaint was lodged and I was given some insignificant tracking number.

      They will likely never read my complaint even though they claim they do but at least I felt like I made mention of it in a level headed manner.

      If anything I expressed my opinion to two people who might not have known that it was undesirable and they might be able to educate two more.

  43. Skip it all by rickmellor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TV is a waste of time. The shows are glorified advertisements and the commercials are overwhelming. The best solution is to just skip the whole thing. Spend more time with your family.

    1. Re:Skip it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spend time with my family?! That'll waste my valuable Everquest time!

      More serously, I'm sure most of us here watch shows outside of network television (which seems to consist of mostly disguised ads and other compost). If the Daily Show is just an ad for John Stewart's book, for example, then so be it.

  44. True, but ReplayTV also changed things. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    The 5500 series removed the automatic commercial skipping feature that I love so much on my 5040, making the newer units somewhat less useful (though the 5500 units still puts marks around the commercials in the recording so you can use the ShowNav buttons to manually skip around them).

    Still, it makes me glad that I purchased my ReplayTV unit when I did... :-)

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    1. Re:True, but ReplayTV also changed things. by boarder · · Score: 1

      From what I remember reading yesterday, there is a hack you can do to get auto commercial skip into the newer series RTVs. I have the older series with it already in, so I can't test it; but it sounds like it involves opening a shell in the RTV and flipping a flag.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
  45. My ReplayTV doesn't do this... by EvilMagnus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...yet.

    I still have 30-sec skip out of the box and the ability to download shows to my PC with free tools over the built in NIC. Sure, it may not run Linux, but it has 2 advantages over TiVO:

    1. It doesn't force me to watch commercials while fast forwarding.
    2. It doesn't assume I'm a gay octogenarian and record shows it thinks I'll love.

    --
    -EvilMagnus
    1. Re:My ReplayTV doesn't do this... by Noksagt · · Score: 1

      You also still have CommercialAdvance if you have a 5000-series or earlier and Show|Nav regardless (which uses the CA algorithm, but must be manually activated).

      But it does display full-screen ads when you press pause.

    2. Re:My ReplayTV doesn't do this... by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

      You know, I've only seen the full-screen ad once - months ago. Either they couldn't get sponsors or they've stopped doing it in our market. Or maybe I don't notice it because I don't pause enough, or the screen saver kicks in before the ad is displayed.

      --
      -EvilMagnus
  46. Damn, and I just bought a TiVo for a holiday gift by Secrity · · Score: 1

    This pisses me off, as I just ordered a TiVo with lifetime subscription to give to a friend as a holiday gift. Oh well, at least it's better than the POS SA DVR that he has now.

  47. Tivo is an irrelevance now anyway by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    With the increasing popularity of no-strings-attached consumer hard disk video recorders from the likes of Panasonic and JVC I'm afraid Tivo will soon be history. Like most pioneers really. Though in this case I doubt they'll be missed.

  48. people, get a clue by dAzED1 · · Score: 0, Troll
    You do realize it COSTS MONEY for broadcasters to provide you with that service, right? And that all that is asked in return is that you take a break every once in a while from the show, and rot your brain with a commercial instead?

    Just how do you propose broadcast TV be paid for?

    Get a clue. If you don't want to watch commericals, then...go running, or read a book. When you eat a traditional cake, you have to deal with the fact that it has fats and sugars in it. If you want a cake with no sugars or fats, then you're going to have to eat a non-traditional cake.

    Watching tv while circumventing the commercials *is* theft - you're breaking the obvious social contract. No one is wronging you, you are wronging *them*.

    That being said, Tivo is being very counter-productive. If someone is fastforwarding through an ad, that means they don't want to see them... I would be terrified to advertise to such a hostile audience, if I were a company.

    1. Re:people, get a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you have been completely brain washed or you don't understand the differences between breach of contract ("social" contract not withstanding), copyright violation, and theft. I vote for brainwashed.

    2. Re:people, get a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you remind me when it was I signed this contract?

    3. Re:people, get a clue by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Just how do you propose broadcast TV be paid for?"

      Same way as the BBC is in Britain - a license fee.

    4. Re:people, get a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Watching tv while circumventing the commercials *is* theft - you're breaking the obvious social contract. No one is wronging you, you are wronging *them*


      That's idiotic. I suppose taking a leak during a commericial is also theft.


      The broadcasters got a sweatheart deal to broadcast over a limitted resource. If they don't like what technology can do then I'm sure another business model would be happy to use the bandwidth.

    5. Re:people, get a clue by style7711 · · Score: 0

      all that is asked in return is that you take a break every once in a while from the show

      That's funny.
      Let you ask you this. Why are there more commercials on nonbroadcast channels i pay for such as TNT and USA? If you watch any of these cable channels the comercial break is sometimes longer than the amount of movie they play before the next comercial break.

      Comercials are for one thing only. Profit. And they will will keep adding more comercials and raising the cable rates because we are to fat and lazy to get our asses off the couch.

    6. Re:people, get a clue by Ecks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Skipping the commercials in broadcast television is no more theft than eating from the sample tray at your grocery store. The broadcast company is gambling that as you watch their content you will be convinced to make a purchasing decision based on its the advertising portion. Just like your local grocer is gambling that you will may like the products that he has on his sample tray enough to buy them.

      The problem here is that this gamble hasn't been paying off lately and the advertising industry has been looking outward for someone to blame rather than looking inward and seeing how they are a large part of the problem. Our world is so filled with advertising now that it's impossible for any one spot stick out. The result is that none of the advertising is persuasive and the industry is losing its gamble wholesale. The broadcast industry is at risk that their clients will decide that this type of advertising doesn't work.

      If we are very very lucky this entire industry will collapse or explode and everyone will get up off of the couch and go running or read a book like you say.

      -- Ecks

    7. Re:people, get a clue by deacon · · Score: 1
      You do realize it COSTS MONEY for broadcasters to provide you with that service, right?

      The companys business plan is not the consumers problem.

      And that all that is asked in return is that you take a break every once in a while from the show, and rot your brain with a commercial instead?

      Commercial time is moving toward 30 minutes per hour of "content". That's a lot more than "once in a while".

      Furthermore, the purpose of commercials is to get you to buy products, and any and every forms of manipulation, including:

      attacks on the viewers self-esteem

      the suggestion that product will make the viewer sexually desireble

      the suggestion that people who own the product are "better" than those who don't

      targeting pre-teen children, who are unable to differentiate the fantasy of the toy commercial from the reality of a shoddy plastic toy costing 25 cents to build

      are used to push worthless baubles to the masses.

      Just how do you propose broadcast TV be paid for?

      See my first point.

      Watching tv while circumventing the commercials *is* theft - you're breaking the obvious social contract. No one is wronging you, you are wronging *them*.

      Best troll I've read all week.

      You, sir, are a Genius, and I salute you.

      That being said, Tivo is being very counter-productive. If someone is fastforwarding through an ad, that means they don't want to see them... I would be terrified to advertise to such a hostile audience, if I were a company.

      You answer your own question here. Maybe, if you were a company, you could use the new information you have learned to be more effective in selling your product

    8. Re:people, get a clue by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Best troll I've read all week.

      Sigh. Trolls used to be a whole lot better. In the old days, someone would have argued that not watching advertising was equivalent to murder, or something.

    9. Re:people, get a clue by dAzED1 · · Score: 1
      "Skipping the commercials in broadcast television is no more theft than eating from the sample tray at your grocery store. The broadcast company is gambling that as you watch their content you will be convinced to make a purchasing decision based on its the advertising portion. Just like your local grocer is gambling that you will may like the products that he has on his sample tray enough to buy them."

      WRONG. The grocery store is hoping you'll buy the thing they are giving away. The broadcasters aren't selling you anything - the cost of the shows they distribute is paid for by the commercials....which are bought by the companies doing the advertizing. Its a terrible comparison - I'd say apples to oranges, but they're not even both fruit.

      That being said, I would love it if people would start improving themselves, and dislodge themselves from their couches. Its amazing how much richer life is when you watch less than an hour of tv a month.

    10. Re:people, get a clue by dAzED1 · · Score: 1
      # attacks on the viewers self-esteem
      # the suggestion that product will make the viewer sexually desireble
      # the suggestion that people who own the product are "better" than those who don't
      # targeting pre-teen children, who are unable to differentiate the fantasy of the toy commercial from the reality of a shoddy plastic toy costing 25 cents to build

      this is different than the crap during the show itself how?

      "You answer your own question here. Maybe, if you were a company, you could use the new information you have learned to be more effective in selling your product"

      I didn't realize I was asking a question...I was making a statement that actually using the advertizing spot itself would be terrible to do. No questions involved.

    11. Re:people, get a clue by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      how about just not watching tv? :P

  49. It's not about skipping advertising by Simprini · · Score: 1

    Fast forwarding commercials is about getting on with the damn show without all the inturruptions. If they want to toss a banner up for the 3 seconds I'm fast forwading, so be it.

    --

    Jesus may love you, but I still think you're an asshole -BVB
  50. It all depends on how the banners work by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    I don't think this is necessarily a bad idea, but it all depends on how they implement it. The article says a small log will be displayed somewhere on the screen. If that's so, then I am not going to mind at all.

    The reason I skip ads is stop wasting my time on stuff I don't want to see. I watch a lot of sports, and I skip the non-action parts on the games for the same reason. The viewing time on NFL games gets reduced from 4 hours to 1 hour.

    The Tivo plans in no way interferes with that. In fact, if the ads are targeted specifically to me, it may even benefit me, although I doubt that'll happen.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  51. My Home Theater PC looks better and better by dragon_imp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Banner ads while fast-forwarding - what will they think of next?

    After hearing about and drooling over the TiVo boxes. I'm glad I built my own HTPC using SageTV and Hauppauge PVR-250 cards. I can record and encode three shows simultaneously while playing a fourth. I can also stream to a client version of the software on my notebook. RealVNC lets me have in-depth control of the HTPC via my notebook to take advantage of my 1680x1050 notebook resolution.

    I've got a writeup and pictures of my Home Theater PC setup on my website.

    Terry

    1. Re:My Home Theater PC looks better and better by jpetts · · Score: 1

      Y'know, I really like the ability to take the ads out of your web site using AdBlock...

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    2. Re:My Home Theater PC looks better and better by dragon_imp · · Score: 1

      Glad I could make your day. Sorry I offended you by putting a Google adblock, 2 web host ads and "Get Firefox" ad on my web pages. I hope I didn't offend you with my computer tips, coffee articles, home theater PC articles or other content.

      If site visitors click on an ad, that's fine; if they don't, that's fine, too. Perhaps, some day, I'll have accumulated enough ad clicks that I actually get paid something. Meanwhile, I'm contributing to the community.

  52. GNU Solution? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    EMACS already does this.

    But seriously, a PC could easily perform TiVO like functions, given the right hardware to interface with the TV. The hardware could just be a dumb comm interface, sold seperately.

    Now here's one for the legal eagles.

    The software performing the commercial skipping is simply a standardised FOSS program you download off the net. It wasn't a product, no one is selling it, so shouldn't it be exempt from FCC regulations? In other words, is software I write, or modify, at home myself, or software someone had freely given to me(gratis), subject to FCC regulations on commercial products?

    Bear this in mind though.

    bool The_System_Works{
    if(A_LOT_OF_$$$ > 0)
    return false;
    else
    return true;
    }

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:GNU Solution? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      But seriously, a PC could easily perform TiVO like functions, given the right hardware to interface with the TV.
      Yeah, it could, even running Free software
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  53. Press Release! by Phixxr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Tivo Corporate Headquaters, 11/17/2004 - Tivo plans to dramatically reduce customer base, at the same time driving themselves out of business. This news comes on the heels of the announcement of people liking the Tivo service. Tivo CEO states "We've become too popular in the past few years. We need to take drastic steps immediately to reduce that popularity, or we might actually be too profitable."

    -phixxr

    --
    ungggghhhh
  54. More targetted ads by mcraig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I actually wouldn't object to ads so much if they were more targetted. I couldn't care less about the latest grill or set of knives etc. However if your telling me about a new cheap plasma screen, ipod etc. then I don't mind so much.

    I still want to be able to skip ads, but you never know if they were more targetted perhaps I wouldn't skip them as much in the first place *shrugs*

  55. I love my ReplayTV by vision33r · · Score: 1

    ReplayTV does everything I want and nothing else I don't want..

  56. MythTV needs this... by matrix0f8h · · Score: 1

    We can't let MythTV fall behind Tivo in this arena.

    I propose we band together and write a plugin for MythTV so that the common man can have access to commercials whilst skipping commercials.

    Think of it:

    "This commercial skipping segment brought to you by McDonalds."

    Yeah. I agree. This makes no fucking sense.

  57. haha cool by TheKubrix · · Score: 1

    With all these new headlines from Tivo, I'm feeling less and less guilty about getting a DVR straight from my cable provider.

  58. Improve your viewing pleasure too by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What would you do if you went to the cinema and every 30 minutes they showed you adverts? you'd be a bit miffed.

    Being able to skip the commercials is to me about not having my viewing pleasure interrupted by commercials for products I'm not going to buy. I don't need advertising to make an informed choice about buying a product.

    1. Re:Improve your viewing pleasure too by mstra · · Score: 1
      Being able to skip the commercials is to me about not having my viewing pleasure interrupted by commercials

      Right. You can still do this. When you FF through the commercials now, you still see then. Just a lot faster.

      Personally, I don't care one way or another about this. The reason I skip through commercials with my Tivo has nothing to do with me being "offended" that someone might want me to see an ad. No. I just want to be able to watch my show with minimial interruption. Spending 3-5 seconds FF-ing through a commercial as opposed to 3-5 minutes watching one is just fine with me.

      Given that, I really don't care WHAT they throw up on the screen while I'm skipping through.

      --
      Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
    2. Re:Improve your viewing pleasure too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need advertising to make an informed choice about buying a product.

      Bawahahaha

      Commercials have zilch to do with making an informed choice. If you think you can make an informed choice through what you see in a commercial, well, I've got a bridge to sell you in NYC.

  59. Hmmmm by meatspray · · Score: 1

    Farewell TiVo. You were a good product, fun and revolutionary at the time, but your failure to change, update, add snazzy features, support high def OTA, share content to my pc and constant subscription fees have pushed you past your prime.

    I've been toying the concept of starting a serious relationship with myth-tv, and this last little knife to the gut will certainly motivate me to move on with a new relationship.

    1. Re:Hmmmm by netsurferchick · · Score: 0

      have you looked into DVR through the local cable company? it is automatically billed along with your cable subscription. i had it, and loved it.

      --
      "Knowledge is from books, Wisdom is from experiences"
    2. Re:Hmmmm by meatspray · · Score: 1

      Yeah they're pretty nice. But with MythTV, you can run mame, burn DVD's, record multiple shows at once and have storage limited only by the amount of money you're willing to throw at it. And you know me, I'm feeling a TB raid 0 coming on.

  60. Good for TiVo. by Xibby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good for TiVo for using their technology for profit. Isn't that the point of going into business?

    Ideally (this is how I think it should work, I don't know exactly how it works...):
    Think of how many commercials are on the air. If advertisers are concerned about commercial skipping, they pay TiVo for the software needed to encode a billboard into their ad, similar to the "press thumbs up to record" or "press thumbs up for more info" that you see often on NBC.

    When TiVo is fast forwarding through the ad and sees the bill board encoded in the video stream, it displays the bill board.

    So:

    - TV stations are happy because advertisers want to buy longer ad slots in order to increase the time their bill board is on the screen during a TiVo fast forward.
    - Advertisers are happy because they have a captive audience for their ads. (you actually have to attentively watch the screen or you'll fast forward into your show)
    - TiVo is happy because they have another revenue source.
    - TiVo owners are still happy because they are still getting through commercials at the same rate as they did before TiVo added this feature.

    Who exactly is loosing?

    --
    I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
    1. Re:Good for TiVo. by Hulfs · · Score: 1
      - TiVo owners are still happy because they are still getting through commercials at the same rate as they did before TiVo added this feature.

      I'm guessing you don't own a Tivo because the 3x FastForward function moves at such a rate (60x ?) that I can skip through a commercial in about a second. Half the time I don't even know what commercials are even playing. My concern is that in order to have billboards display and be grokked by the veiwer during fast forwarding they're going to have to slow down the fast forward rate so that at the very fastest rate each commercial is going to take a few seconds to get through instead of it only taking a few seconds to get through the whole commercial break. If this happened I'd be extremely pissed.

    2. Re:Good for TiVo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ME! Personally I enjoy watching pr0n in FF.

    3. Re:Good for TiVo. by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      The folks who are losing are those who are paying a fee for a fully functioning TIVO. I know that I personally wouldn't mind the ad, but what do I get for the change in the way that my TIVO works? In the mean time, Wired also wrote a snippet where they spoke with TIVO's lawyer about how pay per view content and on demand content that gets recorded to TIVO will be affected by Macrovision's newest technology. You con not indefinitely save said content. It will be erased from your TIVO, like it or not. My next PVR will likely be a MythTV or similarly open sourced offering. TIVO has lost a bit of my respect and hasn't stopped the blood letting ever since they started changing their privacy policy without notice and selling personal viewing information tied to fairly specific demographics.

      I don't mind that TIVO does this, but when do TIVO customers start seeing the fruits of their new revenue streams? When does the monthly charge go down? Instead, "TV your way" becomes less and less about a decision on the consumer's part as they force Hollywood's will upon paying customers, remove features and sell you out to those who want to sell to you.

      Who is losing here? TIVO with their customer base, is what I bet...

  61. That's kind of amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say what's the big deal, the point is still you sit for a split second instead of 30. I'm not trying to avoid advertising, I'm trying to NOT LOSE TIME.

    Unfortunately this might still be a very bad idea for Tivo. Tivo is starting to face increasing competition, and they're going to have Microsoft breathing down their necks very, very soon (Microsoft's PVRs up until now have been jokes, but this won't last forever). Microsoft will seize on any sign of weakness they can find once they get into their "conquer new market" mode, and if Tivo can't keep the public perception of being the best option they are in big trouble.

  62. "Waaaaah!" by SamTheButcher · · Score: 1, Troll
    "Ads on my TiVo? Waaaah!!!"

    Look, you idiots, go volunteer your time with the EFF or something, better yet, a soup kitchen.

    It takes, what, 3 seconds at the fastest rate to skip over a few minutes of commercials? You're not even on that screen long enough to read an ad. If it keeps TiVo (the service with the best interface) out of the dustbin for a few more years, then shit, go for it.

    "But Wwwaaaaaaaahhhh!"

    Get a life.

    1. Re:"Waaaaah!" by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

      Actually, what I would like to see is for this to be lauching platform for a totally free TiVo service, just agree to NOT FF the ads and you get your service free, or watch a monthly quota without FF'ing and for those you go beyond actually earn credit toward purchases with TiVo affiliate partners.

    2. Re:"Waaaaah!" by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      Ooooo good ideas. I have almost always used commercial breaks to get up stretch, take a wizz, or get dinner out of the microwave (yes, the bachelor life) so this would suit me just fine practically...

      However, the thought of someone actually trying to make it a legal requirement just rings as... wrong...

      jason

    3. Re:"Waaaaah!" by SamTheButcher · · Score: 1
      That would be great.

      So, instead of posting this story or whining about it, the whiners should be writing to TiVo with alternatives.

      Or better yet, writing their Senators urging them to vote against the bill, as I did last night, to Sens Allard and Campbell.

  63. I'm not surprised TiVo sold out by themaidtricks · · Score: 1

    Did you honestly believe the behemoth media empires would allow their business model to crumble at the hands of thousands of third world laborers?

  64. Poor featureset by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    most commercials aren't 17-minutes long. Yet.

    "And now, a musical interlude..."

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Poor featureset by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      Which is why I use the superior "Smoke On The Water" ad-blocking system.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  65. who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who really cares if there's an advertising blip on the program advancing bar while you are fast forwarding? TiVo is still the best PVR for its ease of use. The story submitter is completely overreacting over this common-sense addition to the service that will hopefully give TiVo enough money to survive all the challenges it faces.

  66. I just paid for my latest new type magazine by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 1

    and it's filled with commercials. Just because you pay for something, doesn't mean it won't come with advertisement.

    1. Re:I just paid for my latest new type magazine by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Big difference here. You paid for your magazine expecting ads. It's part of the package. Now if your magazine offered you a more expensive subscription that would give you a special edition without ads, how would you feel if they suddenly decided to place "a few" ads in your magazine?

      I know I'd be hopping mad.

  67. I'm damn glad... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    I built my own PVR!!!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  68. TV vs. Internet by ylikone · · Score: 1
    I have digital cable TV but not a PVR... and I've been thinking of just getting rid of the cable altogether... as I hardly ever watch it. Most of my space time is spent on the computer/internet. I mean, I really live on the internet... I work on it, I shop on it, I play on it, I interact with other on it. They might as well just give me a VR helmet, hook up feeding and excretion tubing, and electric pulse wires to keep my muscles from atrophying.

    I dream of the day I can sit down on my virtual couch and watch my virtual television while munching on virtual snacks.

    --
    Meh.
  69. One more reason to get my PVR350 up and running by Synn · · Score: 1

    Tivo has slowly been piling on advertisement after advertisement onto their boxes anyway. I'm already paying 13 bucks a month for their service(which is basically just a program guide listing), I don't need the ads.

    If it's annoying enough maybe it'll finally motivate me to finish building my own PVR and save a 150 bucks a year.

  70. Tuner card, cable without cable box by sam_handelman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In order to use my PC as a PVR I need to be able to bypass my cable box; right now I can't do that, the internal tuner has to stay on channel 3. Does anyone know of software for the Radeon that will descramble the signal? I suppose it would be illegal here in the States?

    www.mythtv.org is slashdotted, if that's what it does.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  71. Tivo's shooting itself in the foot... by Ecks · · Score: 1

    Tivo's a really great technology and the convenience of just taking it out of the box and having it work is very cool by me but catering to the needs of the advertising industry by removing one of their main selling points is like

    1. Re:Tivo's shooting itself in the foot... by Ecks · · Score: 1

      Tivo's a really great technology and the convenience of just taking it out of the box and having it work is very cool by me but catering to the needs of the advertising industry by removing one of their main selling points is shooting themself in the foot. I hope that they can survive the injury.

      My next PVR was going to be a Myth TV box anyhow but this just accelerates my timetable.

      -- Ecks

  72. Choices by Stubtify · · Score: 1
    Well, having had a tivo for the last 4 years this doesn't seem all that bad to me. First of all, we're talking about a very short fast forward time. The fastest FF is 60x which means that 3 minutes of commercials would take 3 seconds to skip. Think of the tradeoff here, 3 seconds of static ads, or 3 minutes of wasted time?

    If you don't want to see them while ff'ding you could just watch the real commercials. There is no free lunch.

  73. Cheese and Crackers!!! by barfy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, RTFA... This is not about putting banner ads during fast forward. It is about putting up interaction during ads. This has already been tested and is shown to work. (IE people respond to it).

    It is also an article showing that TiVo can provide advertisements that have better response rates than interstitial advertising provides.

    But this slashdot posting is editorializing from beginning to end. I can understand that *you* don't wnat to see any advertising ever... Good for you. (but look at the banners at the top and right of the the slashdot page you nit.) But you know nothing about why I or many people have TiVo! And for the most part all this editorializing is WRONG. The interstital is being replaced by the more attractive click-ins. The ads are better produced, more entertaining, more informative. And they are not being replaced by more intrusive advertising. It is being replaced by *less* intrusive and more interactive advertising. And you can still opt out of the data collection! Get a friggin grip.

    1. Re:Cheese and Crackers!!! by standsolid · · Score: 1

      (but look at the banners at the top and right of the the slashdot page you nit.)

      /me looks at to top right

      hmmmm /me looks at bottom right

      ahhhhhhhh.

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    2. Re:Cheese and Crackers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but look at the banners at the top and right of the the slashdot page you nit

      <IMG>

      ooooooooo...pretty!
      (I'm using a textonly browser...you nit)

    3. Re:Cheese and Crackers!!! by mikeage · · Score: 1

      This has already been tested and is shown to work. (IE people respond to it).

      Who cares what Internet Explorer people respond to? They also respond to emails from Citibank, Comet Cursor, and Bonzai Buddy!
      Oh... you meant "i.e.," as in the Latin id est (English translation: "that is").

      Oops.

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    4. Re:Cheese and Crackers!!! by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      but look at the banners at the top and right of the the slashdot page you nit

      Am I supposed to see ads there?

      They must be really small or something, its taking effort to find them. I don't see them.

      Ohhh, they have that big slashdot bit up top, they're advertising themselves!

      That doesn't bother me too much. Kinda fits in with the site.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    5. Re:Cheese and Crackers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use IE on my Windows machines simply because it comes with my chosen user interface. I also use Konqueror on my Linux machines, again because it comes with my chosen interface. I don't have the time or the inclination to install another web browser when one comes free with my operating system. That doesn't make me some moron who responds to pop-ups and spam.

    6. Re:Cheese and Crackers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, seems to me I saw a Solaris 10 ad on top of the thread, now on top of the post a comment page I see Half-Life 2, above the "slashdot bit" you refer to.

    7. Re:Cheese and Crackers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, you can still see the ads? Hint: Firefox + Adblock extension. I'll bet that's the case with the majority of /.ers as well.

    8. Re:Cheese and Crackers!!! by NG+Resonance · · Score: 1

      (but look at the banners at the top and right of the the slashdot page you nit)

      What banners? ;)

  74. Are Amercians Just Plain RETARDED? by webzombie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ok, now just how f@#$'n STUPID are Amercians going to get before the implode on themselves or the rest of the planet kicks their greedy lying asses?

    The US government is spreading cruelity and misery in the Middle East and calling it freedom. US corps are patenting anything and everything. FCC declares they own PCs and anything attached to them that "communicates"... the list of stupidity goes on and on!

    Think about folks... the last attack on the US government before 911 was Oklahoma and executed by Amercians.

    1. Re:Are Amercians Just Plain RETARDED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah-h-h-h-h! It just wouldn't be /. without the obligatory (yet totally irrelevant to the topic) American bashing, would it? Yes, the U.S. is responsible for every, single problem in the world because we're all just a bunch of retards now that webzombie has said so.

      I can sleep better tonight knowing that webzombie has made this a normal /. thread. Thank you for your unbridled and unnecessary hatred, webzombie.

    2. Re:Are Amercians Just Plain RETARDED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humm, maybe there should be a Godwin type law made around this.

      Here is what I have come up with, Slashdot's Law: As a Slashdot discussion grows larger, the probability of a "America's are dumb" or "It is American's fault" post approaches one.

    3. Re:Are Amercians Just Plain RETARDED? by nazzdeq · · Score: 1

      American's aren't stupid, but TiVo is plenty stupid. The advertisers have to go to in-show advertising. Have the actor drink a fuckin' coke or eat some popcorn. Thirty second ads are history....so is TiVo. I'm cancellin' that shit...fuck DirectTV too.

  75. Big Deal. by eric_brissette · · Score: 1

    When I fast forward I'm not trying to avoid ads so much as I'm trying to get back to the show I was watching.

    If you don't like the ad, then don't look at it. It's not like the web where banner ads take up prescious screen real-estate; who cares if you can't see part of an advertisement you were fast forwarding through anyway.

    However, I could see how it would be annoying when you're fast forwarding through a movie trying to find a certain point.

  76. TiVo's next upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  77. Cluebat for yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, it COSTS MONEY to GET cable. Once they've laid down the line, it costs bugger all to keep it there.

    When cable came out, it cost a lot more than broadcast TV, but the reasoning for this was "Well, you won't get advertisements braking into your programming". Where did that idea go?

    Tell you what, if you are going to tell me what I can watch, YOU can pay for it. All of it. In fact, I may start charging you for the time spent watching it. Hey, my time ain't free!

  78. ReplayTV Ads by Noksagt · · Score: 1

    I am a proud owner of a ReplayTV 5040. That being said, it to has ads: leave your ReplayTV paused sometime & you should see an ad for discounts on the 5500 series or additional subscriptions. So far, the ads have been almost all for ReplayTV's own products, which is slightly more tolerable. They are also only on when you aren't actually watching TV. But they are still fullscreen & they are still a bit tacky. My CD players don't spew commercials if I pause a CD. My microwave doesn't scoll ads when I'm not cooking. Why should any unit that I pay for--especially one that is a somewhat expensive luxury item--inundate me with ads.

    1. Re:ReplayTV Ads by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I also own a 5040. Since I bought the unit last March, there have been maybe four times that ReplayTV has run ads when paused. The flow goes like this:

      1. Hit pause, show appears in freeze frame.
      2. After about five minutes on pause, ad appears.
      3. After about five minutes more, the screen saver kicks in.

      If I walk away for a long time, I'll never see the ad for more than about a second when I come back (press button to cancel screen saver, press PAUSE to resume playing).

      It appears that there are quite a few places where ReplayTV might support ads (the Menu screen and the Zones area both feature rotating banners) but I've never seen them used.

      At least ReplayTV is in the hands of Denon & Marantz, which will not live or die by ReplayTV's success. TiVo still isn't profitable and won't be until January 2006 (by its own admission) so it really needs the revenue.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:ReplayTV Ads by smack.addict · · Score: 1

      You can configure this behavior. ReplayTV lets you play a slideshow from your photos collection if you have one while paused.

    3. Re:ReplayTV Ads by Noksagt · · Score: 1

      Are you sure this overrides the ads? The ads don't appear every time you pause.

      I never set the unit up with a photo partition--better for me to squeeze in another hour of TV instead.

    4. Re:ReplayTV Ads by Noksagt · · Score: 1

      I've had my unit for about two years. I've seen a lot, but you are correct that more-often-than-not, you aren't subjected to an add.

      But you aren't right about when it happens. You need only to have it paused for a few seconds for one to appear. Usually you may press exit to make it disappear, but it will reappear after about 2 minutes.

      I do share your optimism that ReplayTV would be slower to adopt additional advertising.

  79. anyone reminded of...? by jxyama · · Score: 2, Insightful
    this reminds me of the whole caller-id, blocked-id fiasco with the telephone companies... a company in the middle, double-dipping...

    tivo can do this right by offering service credit to those willing to watch the ads while fast-forwarding. if they really mean "tv your way" then that's the right way. (the wrong way, like the caller-id crap, is to charge the customers to not watch ads during fast-forward.) if you respect the customers, tivo, then give them the choice.

  80. Yeah, right by melted · · Score: 1

    First, you pay $50 for your cable. Then you pay $12 for your TiVo. And after all of this they STILL won't allow you to totally skip commercials. Good lord, sometimes I'm so glad I don't watch TV. AT ALL. Is this a criminal act yet to not watch TV at all?

  81. TiVo Already Plays Tricks by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    There have been times when TiVo has changed the channel on my TiVo so that it is on a channel with an infomercial in the morning. Other times, it's been left on a blank channel, making me wonder briefly if something broke overnight.

    I've complained to TiVo about this, but I suppose the only way to influence them is if enough of us cancel our TiVo service in protest. They claim innocence, that the TiVo changes the channel just to get programming updates, and that it's a necessary annoyance of the service.

    I suggested then, fine, just change the channel back after you're done. The phone drone on the line claimed this was not technically feasible.

    My workaround: I set the TiVo to record 30 minutes of HLN every morning at 7:00, thus changing the channel to a non-infomercial channel every morning.

    Despite this, I suspect that TiVo is going to fuck around enough eventually that I will just cancel the service, and that will be that.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  82. Short answer: by eric_brissette · · Score: 1

    Yes, yes we are.

  83. TiVo Commercial Skipping Trick by EricHsu · · Score: 3, Informative
    Select - Play - Select - 3 - 0 - Select

    Now your 'jump to index button' (the right arrow pointing at a pipe ->|) will jump 30 seconds if you are in play mode. You can change the 3 and 0 to suit your needs. The 'jump to index' still works as it used to if you are in rewind or fastforward mode.

    1. Re:TiVo Commercial Skipping Trick by Naikrovek · · Score: 1

      ding! we have a winner. For those of us on Tivo anyway.

      i set this to 30 and press it 5 times to get through commercials. takes one whole second.

    2. Re:TiVo Commercial Skipping Trick by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      I press 'z' or if we're using the remote the blue button... once... No jumping 30 seconds 5 times then back 5 seconds 2 times then wait for the 2 remaining seconds... The only reason we have it set to push a button at all is because commercial detection has a unique problem with Farscape. Jumping is not commercial skipping and it's been around since the series 1 Replay/TiVos. Commercial skip is only in a select few models of Replay and there's a decent chance it may go away as well.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    3. Re:TiVo Commercial Skipping Trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they will slow down fast-fowarding or otherwise ensure a minimum amount of time that a banner is displayed. E.g., every fast forward requires at least 10 second banner, so don't bother ff if you only want to skip 7 seconds.

    4. Re:TiVo Commercial Skipping Trick by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      With MythTV, though, one button press takes you to the end of all five (or however many) commercials, instead of the end of just one. So it goes like this:

      MythTV user:
      * Commercial starts.
      * Press skip.
      * Continue watching show.

      Tivo user:
      * Commercial starts.
      * Press skip.
      * Press skip.
      * Press skip.
      * Press skip.
      * Press skip.
      * Realize that last one went a bit too far, so you have to back up a bit.
      * Press rewind.
      * Continue watching show.

      Even if you get it just right and don't have to rewind at all, you're still going through quite a few more steps for every commercial break.

      And that's assuming the MythTV user doesn't just set auto-skip. If they do, it would be more like this:

      * Continue watching show (because it skips just before the commercial starts).

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    5. Re:TiVo Commercial Skipping Trick by mr_zorg · · Score: 1

      I tried this, and personally I don't like it. In 60x FF mode it takes only a few seconds to skip past the commercials anyway, and the automatic "jump back" (reaction time compensation) feature means I almost never overshoot. It's even less button presses (FF, FF, FF, [wait], Play).

  84. You knew this had to happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't possibly believe the free ride of DVR's (whether it be Tivo, Replay, MythTV, or whatever) could possibly last forever. If the facts in the article are accurate, and 40% of viewers will be using DVR's to skip commercials in the next few years, the advertisers will just stop paying the same rates. Someone has to pay for these shows, and I sure as hell don't want to pay more on my cable bill than I do now, so whatever TIVO can do to legitimize this technology is fine with me.

    Anyone who didn't suspect something like this was coming simply doesn't understand what pays for all the television we're addicted to. Sure we could have done this with those VCR's sitting in our closet, but I never recorded 30 hours of TV a week in the VCR days like I do now.

    I commend TIVO on battling back all the bureaucratic and corporate bullshit that plagues this kind of technology. I'll give ReplayTV and MythTV a try when they start helping solidify the technology, and not just hiding in the corners and screwing it up for the rest of us.

    We can live with the freaking banners.

  85. Enable the 30 second skip and don't worry about it by Luscious868 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just enable the 30 second skip and you'll never use fast forward to skip commercials again. When it's enabled, the -->| button becomes a 30 second skip button.

    To enable:

    1. Grab your TiVo remote.

    2. Bring up any recorded program. (You have to be watching a recorded program rather than "Live TV" in order to enable the feature.)

    3. On your TiVo remote, key in the following sequence:
    SELECT PLAY SELECT 30 SELECT

    4. If you've successfully entered the code, you should hear three "bings" in succession to inform you that you've successfully enabled the 30 second skip.

    The only down side is that any time your TiVo is rebooted (such as after a power outage or a software update) you'll have to re-enable this feature.

  86. Sad by xnot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The whole point of Cable TV when it was introduced is to offer people a scheme whereby they payed to NOT see commercials. Then execs realized they could make more money by forcing you to watch commercials in addition to paying for TV.

    Same thing with movies. For a while, the justification of higher movie ticket prices was the fact that you didn't have to see commercials before the movie. Now they brought that back, so you are once again paying for both content and commercials (typically I will be 10-15 minutes late to a movie so I don't have to sit through commercials.)

    Even websites are getting increasingly annoying. A web browser without a popup ad blocker is almost useless. Half the websites you go to, you have to register to view any content, so the company can spam your inbox with product ads. God forbid a person read any content without a million ads in their face.

    Now even TiVo has sadly succum to what seems to be a very bad trend in the US. TiVo was one of the few companies that seemed to understand that people DON'T want to constantly be smothered by rediculus ads. One of the few companies using a technology to give power back to the people. But it looks like it wasn't meant to last. Time to kiss that all goodby, and say hello to more pop up ads and spam.

    And execs wonder why people do things like pirate TV shows and movies? When you treat your customers like little babies, guess what? Eventually people get pissed off, and will go out of their way to find an alternative system that works for them. Even if it's illegal.

  87. TV no longer worth it, total waste of brain space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A long time ago, upon becoming an adult, I decided that the so called "entertainment value" of TV was no longer worth my time, due to the constant and disgusting attempts at psychological manipulation and subversion.

    It's a shame, because I thought TIVO was eventually going to change that viewpoint for me, and that maybe I'd watch a little more TV. Nope. Glad I didn't buy one.

    Look, strangers don't have a right to your psychological anchors and desires. These people study mind control for a living. Entertainment will eventually be ad-free, or we can expect a large percentage of the educated populace to forego it. Consumer voodoo does not deserve storage on even a single wrinkle of my brain.

    The sad thing is that even movies are getting spammed these days.

  88. One of the whole points? by -acksaw · · Score: 0

    Which one is it? One of the points, or the whole point? I'm so confused.

  89. The purpose of television shows... by BlueThunderArmy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... is to sell advertising. Although it runs contrary to how we as consumers think, the TV was invented as an advertising tool. How do you get people to watch commercials? Sandwich them between entertainment segments.

    The advent of TiVo undermined this quite a bit, of course, which is why there's a bit of backlash now. Again, I think more people are in it to save time (although there is that "skip annoying commercials" aspect to it...), but circumventing advertisements that pay for the shows you enjoy is a bit of a grey area.


    Also interesting is that TFA doesn't make it clear whether the banner ads will be equivalent to the commercial being skipped over, which would raise some issues if advertisers making payments to TiVo overruled those who had paid for a certain time slot. Even if the ads=the commercials, there is some question of who will end up profiting from the exposure-Should Tivo share its money with NBC because one of its banner ads was triggered by a commercial broadcast during one of NBC's programs?


    Thank Christ I'm not in advertising!

  90. Didn't Gator get sued for doing this? by Cygnusx12 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the early Gator system that would "eat" online ads, and replace them with ones Gator felt you'd rather see.
    I believe they settled with most, but last I knew they were still in court with Fed Ex and UPS. CNN.com

    How is what TiVo intends to do any different? It seems like a quick way to get dragged into court IMHO. I mean really, who's to stop Gateway (or other company) from advertising on TiVo during the Christmas season when Dell (or other competitor) is pouring money into the networks?

  91. DishNetwork by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

    Screw Tivo and DirectTV. Just switch to DishNetwork and get their PVR setup. It isn't Tivo and it is fully featured with a 30 second skip, 5 second rewind, fast forward, slow motion, etc. All the same basic features (although when shows move time slots, the PVR doesn't follow them.. at least not the version I have. I'd like that feature, but it doesn't kill me to not have it.) Plus in the past DishNetwork has shown a remarkable attention to their customers and would likely(or I hope, anyway) fight to keep their PVR option available.

  92. Autoskip is still available in old ReplayTV units. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    Even though the firmware has been updated, that feature hasn't been removed from the 5000-series units.

    If you can find an older model unit, that feature will still be there...

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  93. Simple way to avoid ads by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    Just watch BBC!

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  94. MythTV, here I come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was planning to get Tivo but with this kind of nonsense ... no way. MythTV, here I come!

  95. Not a big deal by entrager · · Score: 1

    To all of those "this is going to destroy TiVo" people out there, let me remind you of this: it takes 1 second to skip 1 minute of commercials on a TiVo. I own two of them, and this doesn't bother me one bit. So I have to look at a 4-second long banner ad while I fastforward? Who cares?!

  96. The parent is not a troll by waynegoode · · Score: 1
    The parent is not a troll. As I ReplayTV owner, I'm trying a humorous way to tell TiVo owners why I think ReplayTV is better. I'm sorry if it comes across harsh. That's the trouble with text.

    I'm not the originator of these types of complaints. I heard these complaints from TiVo owners themselves. I was part of the distributed computing approach to crack the key in the 3.2 release of TiVo, including working on software updates just before the project was cancelled. Read the posts on the site for yourself. I helped even though I'd didn't have a TiVo.

    ReplayTV owners believe they have a better system and are often irritated that TiVo gets all the attention. It seems like its Betamax vs VHS again.

  97. What is this thing "fast forward" you speak of? by clmensch · · Score: 2, Informative

    I feel bad for Tivo owners. I love my ReplayTV 5000. It skips commercials automatically with surprisingly good accuracy. It rarely if ever incorrectly skips content...but sometimes it doesn't realize that a commercial break has begun. In any case, I can just instantly jump forward 30 seconds (or however far I want).

    Tivo is the AOL of PVR's.

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
  98. Missed Revenue ANYWAY!! by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

    -- unless HR2391 passes and makes me a criminal for skipping commercials

    Even if it passes, I'm not getting rid of my MythTV box. Once the signal is in my home, I can do what I want with it. If I don't want to watch commercial advertisements, I'm not going to. Whether that means turning the TV off for 3 minutes or letting my MythTV sort it all out for me doesn't really matter. Either way, someone is losing ad revenue on me. Besides, I can't even remember the last purchase I made based on a TV advertisement. The only thing I find useful with commercials are the advertisements for upcoming shows on the History CHannel.

  99. When will advertisers learn by smartin · · Score: 1

    That associating your product with a feeling of annoyance in the consumer does not generate more revenue, it generates less.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  100. Why don't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    switch of your television set and go do something less boring instead?

  101. You have all my money , Want my blood As well by PacketScan · · Score: 1

    Ok come on here.. Advertising while i fast forward.
    I bought the device
    I pay direct tv through the nose for programming (monthly)
    I pay direct tv again just to use the tivo (monthly)
    I'm playing by the rules and still feel like i'm getting screwed, wait that's because i am..
    It's time we stood up to the big guys. -my2cents

  102. Don't Watch Television by Apreche · · Score: 1

    You know what I don't do? Watch television. I only watch DVDs or things downloaded from the net. All of which are commercial free. I'll sometimes go to the movie theatre, but I make a concious effort to ignore, talk over, or make obscenities at the pre-movie ads. Except at the artsy theatre, where the ads are for other artsy movies. All the information I get comes through the net, filtered through firefox to remove all ads. Yeah, I don't see slashdot ads. So ha! I don't use the AdBlock extensions either. I have a handy userContent.css file that does it all.

    My life is ad free except for physical adsvertisements that get in my way out on the street. Like when I go to the grocery store, or billboards on the highway, or a visit to NYC.

    Rather than complain that something like TV has ads you can't remove, just don't watch TV as long as it has ads. If slashdot's ads were unremovable I would probably stop reading it too.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  103. Try Out Freevo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Speaking of "free" tivo (free as in commercial free) check out http://freevo.sourceforge.net/

  104. Re:Finally, something the UK will be glad not to g by LordNimon · · Score: 1

    Ditto. If my S1 ever fails, I'm just going to get a MythTV.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  105. The Market by hhawk · · Score: 1

    TiVO, Replay and other PVR are much more about time shifting then anything else. Forwarding through content ads or TV is a feature. That Tivo seeks to put ads there isnt' wrong in any moral sense. It might not help them in the marketplace but it might not hurt them either. As long as they dont' "slow" the forward movement of the fast forward, they aren't interfering with the feature.

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
  106. Shift in revenue away from content producers? by mrinella · · Score: 1

    So how do the networks earn money to produce content if Tivo usurps their advertsing space with advertising of its own? Do the networks and cable channels who derive most of their money from ads somehow share in the revenue? If not, it would seem to be an ultimately unsustainable model - if everyone has a Tivo, why would I pay to advertise on ABC/CBS/NBC when I know most people will just fast forward through it and see a Tivo advertisement instead.

  107. Do you really think advertising will go away? by Argyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean seriously folks.

    Advertising is here for good. It's a mainstay of our entire socio-economic model.

    Of course, as television changes, so will the way advertising works.

    For all of you that are 'shocked, shocked' that Tivo intends to get into the ad business, wake up and smell the coffee. Business is about money and ads are where the money lives.

    --
    nuclear iraq bioweapon encryption cocaine korea terrorist
  108. Good Point by Luscious868 · · Score: 1
    I disagree. I think, most people, bought Tivo for its timeshifting and season pass features. Are commercials really so bad?

    You made a good point. Time shifting and season passes are the reason that I bought Tivo. I was paying so much for cable and there was often nothing on that I wanted to watch. I was also tired of staying home certain nights to catch my favorite shows when something else was going on that I wanted to do as well. With time shifting and season passes, there's also something to watch and I can watch what I want, when I want.

    As for commericals, sometimes when I'm watching a prerecorded show on Tivo I forget that it is prerecorded and that I can fast forward through the commericals and I end up sitting right through them anyway. Commericals really aren't that bad. Although, if they do insist on showing ad's while fast forwarding, I should hope they reduce the monthly fee they charge subscribers. Of course we both know that won't happen.

    1. Re:Good Point by willy134 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Been using mythTV for over a year now and commercials ARE that bad. My broadcast channels show commercials that are far worse than any commercials on my dishnetwork channels.

      Once you are used to watching commercial free and something happens (computer crash etc...) and you watch TV you feel assaulted after watching the commercials. I don't want to know (nor my kids to know) about the newest (fe)male enhancement drug.
      I don't care about the next episode of some stupid sitcom with low ratings.

      People say tv makes you dumber. I would have to say that commercials just add to that. Why waste 15 minutes watching an hour show when you can watch it later and in shorter time

      The only dissadvantage to not having commercials is trying to make time for a pee break(oh I guess that is what the pause button is for)

      --
      Can you ping me now?... Good!
    2. Re:Good Point by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Excellent post. I signed up for netflix in May and I've been watched a lot of the TV shows from the past few years I haven't bothered to see when they were first run.

      Switching between commerical-free DVDs I was really surprised by how big a difference it makes. Now I can't stand TV commercials. I've cut my satellite service back to the minimum (and I will cancel entirely eventually) and I've upped my netflix level. There's even shows on first-run now that I'm deliberately not watching until they come out on DVD and I can enjoy them properly.

      The commercials are bad, but what I find much, much worse is those station logos, especially when they animate and have sound over the show. Even if there were free ad-free TV, I still wouldn't watch it if it still had those station logos. A lot of stations even put ads for other shows or later showings of the same show you're watching on the screen interrupting the current show.

      TV just isn't worth it, the ads are so bad, I'd rather have no TV than TV with commercials.

  109. Warning by Shadow_139 · · Score: 0

    Under "HR2391" If I blink during an add which is an electronic act, e.g. electric pulse sent from my brain (A form of technology) to my eyes. --- http://www.brown.edu/Administration/News_Bureau/19 99-00/99-048.html --- "Clutch my testes, bloody squirrel humpers!!" -Happy Noodle Boy

  110. Advantage of TiVo over MythTV is STILL too great! by wealthychef · · Score: 1

    I'd love something like MythTV to break out and replace TiVo. Only problem: MythTV does not to my knowledge have an IR channel-changer, so I'm probably stuck with some TV-tuner card, which only will get a few stations. In other words, it's not cable-TV/satellite TV friendly. All the shows I watch are on cable/HBO. Bummer! Please tell me I'm wrong. Also, even with an IR changer, it fairly often fails to change the channel correctly, for some reason. It's certainly no more than 95% or 98% reliable. The integrated satellite+TiVo (direcTivo) unit I have ALWAYS, FLAWLESSLY records what I want when I want. That being said, TiVo sucks. It is not configurable enough, you have to do text entry with a freaking remote control, the filters and other choices are limited, and they've never improved their features in the years since I've been using them. But, like democracy, it's the "worst possible form of (entertainment), except for all the others."

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  111. Do not relate your product to spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Tivo has had it's ups and downs, and it shows.

    But just as important as the price, is the number of stocks trading (the little logarithmic graph below the main graph). This is a direct (albeit, relative) indication of it's popularity. You want people talking about your product; some will be cussing it, others will be deciding about it, and still other will be smoozing others into it. But they are talking about it, and people walking by just happen to hear about it, creating even more discussion. Which leads to window shopping, which leads to people walking out with a Tivo and an audio receiver.

    But this little maneuver with the "banner ads" will remind people of adware and spyware and malware and popups. It will remind people of spam.

    You do not want to relate your product to spam...

  112. Actually, I think this is a REALLY CRAPPY idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "When you fast-forward, the content isn't all that interesting anyhow." That's the assumption. Where's the support?

    Yes, I use TiVo to skip over commercials. I also use FF for shows I can watch without sound and faster than real time. Will the service know if I'm FF over a commercial or for some other purpose?

    For example I can watch a 3-hour football match in about half the time. I don't need the analyst's inane chatter, and I can always go back to regular speed to catch a big play.

    In addition, this 'feature' contradicts TiVo's own marketing. There's no sound while a show is in FF, but one of TiVo's tips is to turn on the closed captions and read the dialogue while watching the show faster.

    If the banner ad is anywhere on the screen where I can see it, then it is intrusive.

    "Listen, TiVo needs to make money. They're a company selling a product. Everyone seems to forget that and whine when they don't give you everything for free. I applaud them for coming up with a way to sell ad space without interfering with normal use of the product."

    That's just wrong. TiVo gives NOTHING for free. I've already paid for the hardware and paid for the service, and I didn't whine about it. This is TiVo unilaterally changing the terms of the deal after they have my money. Would you applaud nVidia if they decided to display banner ads on every computer with their graphics cards? Listen, nVidia needs to make money, right?

    "What would you rather have, no fast-forward, forcing you to watch commercials, or a fast-forward with a small screen overlay that you only have to look at for as long as you are fast-forwarding?"

    I'd rather have the service I paid for. But you're missing the real question, would you rather have FF with a small screen overlay, or a boat anchor that's useless if TiVo goes out of business and no other company picks up the service?

    1. Re:Actually, I think this is a REALLY CRAPPY idea by Akrat · · Score: 1

      Tivo has been doing this for over two years already. They have been placing thumbs up icons during specific sponsored commercials, and you do see the icon while fast forwarding. If you stop and thumbs up during the commercial, it will take you to an ad page where you can view more information, or opt-in to receive some info from the company. That's all they are doing. They are replacing the thumbs up with a banner to promote the advertising further. I don't know how you people are distorting this story to the point where all of a sudden, you are not going to be able to fast forward through commercials, or that some huge Netzero banner is going to be plastered across your television screen any time you FF. Geez.

    2. Re:Actually, I think this is a REALLY CRAPPY idea by nytmare · · Score: 1

      While fast-forwarding TiVo, I am constantly pressing the "clear" button to remove the FF bar from the bottom of the screen because it's in the way; I need to see the whole screen to speed-read the program and also to know when to stop FFing. Anything else they add to the screen during FF is going to make this condition worse. Is TiVo's clear button going to continue to remove all the extraneous crap from the screen during FF?

    3. Re:Actually, I think this is a REALLY CRAPPY idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      I don't have an issue with the TiVo thumbs-up-for-more-info during commercials. I really don't have issue with TiVo showing a commercial over a commercials during FF.

      My question is, will TiVo know if I'm FF over a commercial or not?

      From TFA: "TiVo viewers will see 'billboards,' or small logos, popping up over TV commercials as they fast-forward through them."

      The article is unclear. If the ads are tied to the existing tv commercials, like the thumbs up system, that's fine. I don't think anyone would have issue with that. It's just an ad over an ad.

      However, if the ads are tied to the FF function, even if I'm not FF over commercials, that's a horse of another color. That's a worst case interpretation of the article, but there's nothing in there to say this isn't the case.

      As an owner of multiple TiVos, I'd like reassurance that I won't get some huge Netzero banner plastered across my television any time I FF.

    4. Re:Actually, I think this is a REALLY CRAPPY idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you applaud nVidia if they decided to display banner ads on every computer with their graphics cards?

      Apparently, you've never used nVidia X drivers on a linux box.

    5. Re:Actually, I think this is a REALLY CRAPPY idea by nsayer · · Score: 1
      Will the service know if I'm FF over a commercial or for some other purpose?

      Yes. Lexus is going to buy the right to replace a fast-forwarded Lexus ad with a billboard lasting the duration of the FFed ad. That's all. Just like now they presently add the 'Thumbs up for more info' thing for the duration of that ad (whether it's being FFed or not). When you're FFing a show, nothing different will happen than happens today.

    6. Re:Actually, I think this is a REALLY CRAPPY idea by Akrat · · Score: 1

      It already knows it's a commercial, as is evident when it places the thumbs icon on the screen from paid advertisers during their commercials.

    7. Re:Actually, I think this is a REALLY CRAPPY idea by jcoleman · · Score: 1
      This is TiVo unilaterally changing the terms of the deal after they have my money.

      ...which you agreed to let them do when you signed up for the service. It's all your fault!!!

  113. Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Chatmag · · Score: 2, Informative

    Doing a bit of digging, I find that Tivo is a public company. Some information on them:

    Company Profile

    Company Two Year Stock Chart

    This move seems to be a result of the hard stock price drop which occurred between March and September of 2004. I've always thought of corporations as one of those huge Euclid off road dump trucks with the 12' tires, and no power steering.

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    1. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Hassman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I actually own the TIVO stock.

      The price drop was due to the break in the relationship between TIVO and DirectTV.

      Investors didn't think TIVO could make it without being directly related to a service provider. The sentiment is slowly changing as more and more people suscribe to TIVO independent of DirectTV.

      I sure hope it comes back more. I lost my shirt. They had everything going for them until that announcement.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    2. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Tazzy531 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Been following them for the past year. They are facing a problem of becoming a commodity. Each independent cable/satellite company is rolling out their own home grown DVR box. DirectTV dropped them last March and divested from them quite a bit.
      the last big news was that Microsoft just signed a deal with Comcast to provide DVR service, which directly competes with TIVO.
      This ad-skipping commercial is good news for us shareholders. They need to prove that they have alternative revenues than just subscription.
      Now to put on my consumer/techy hat. Why would anyone have a problem of seeing a banner ad rather than a blank screen when they fast forward? It's not hurting you in any way. I understand that since you pay 12.95 a month you should get it ad-free. But why not make the same request to cable television? I'm paying $33/month for cable TV, should I have the same expectation that Comedy Central is ad-free?

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    3. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      Hi Mark,

      Thanks for that clarification. I had only done a quick search. What I was thinking is that if this story is true, then it would make sense that Tivo would be exploring other sources of revenue. I'll put Tivo on my stocks to watch list and see how it goes.

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    4. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      Tazzy,

      Thanks for that information too. About your site, can you send me some information so I can add it to our software guide? Basic description, features, etc. It looks like something our viewers would be interested in. You can send it direct to my email address. Thanks, Pete

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    5. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Politburo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I understand that since you pay 12.95 a month you should get it ad-free. But why not make the same request to cable television? I'm paying $33/month for cable TV, should I have the same expectation that Comedy Central is ad-free?

      No, you don't understand. It's completely different.

      If you were a new customer to cable, you would expect commercials on most channels. It would have been no surprise if you had done just a cursory amount of research on the service you were signing up for.

      If you saw TiVO at a friend's house and signed up for it, you would not have the expectation of any banner ads whatsoever, no matter how much research you did on the service (rumors aside). All of the sudden, you will now be getting ads.

      Bait and switch.

    6. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Hassman · · Score: 2, Informative

      No problem. Oh, I'm sure they are looking for other sources of revenue. I still think they are opperating in the red (though not by much, perhaps a little more this quarter due to a huge advertising push in some states). Generally this is a no-no when thinking about buying a stock.

      The reason I bought it is because they are on the verge of being so great. It is a bit of a risk, but I was hoping to jump in while the getting was good, before the stock took off. As it turns out I got in a litle too early, and have lost a bunch of money.

      I still think it is a good company that is ready to hit it big. The timing is the tricky part.

      Oh well. Good luck!

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    7. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I sure hope it comes back more. I lost my shirt. They had everything going for them until that announcement.

      You say it like it's a bad thing. If the stock is really recovering, wouldn't now be a good time to BUY while the prices are still low?

    8. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Absolutly! I think it is a great time to buy. The problem is one needs money to buy stock. There is nothing I want to sell to let me buy more. I don't want to really get into my trading habbits / portfolio or anything, so I'll leave it at that.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    9. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm paying over ~$110/month for my cable. I still see the damn ads!

  114. How do you separate the two? by Darth+Muffin · · Score: 1

    I defy you to deliver channels to me *without* the content.

    --
    Real programmers use "copy con program.exe"
    1. Re:How do you separate the two? by telstar · · Score: 3, Funny
      "I defy you to deliver channels to me *without* the content."
      • Turn on UPN or the WB any day of the week...

    2. Re:How do you separate the two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      **Insert obvious FoxNews/MTV/Lifetime joke here**

    3. Re:How do you separate the two? by I_M_Noman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "I defy you to deliver channels to me *without* the content."


      Turn on UPN or the WB any day of the week...
      You obviously don't watch either WB or UPN on Tuesdays. 8pmET on WB is Gilmore Girls, 9pmET on WB is Veronica Mars -- which, along with Lost, is one of the two best new shows this season.
    4. Re:How do you separate the two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gilmore Girls? Is that the one with 4 geriatric women sharing a condo? I love that show. That Rose just cracks me up!

    5. Re:How do you separate the two? by yotto · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't watch either WB or UPN on Tuesdays. 8pmET on WB is Gilmore Girls, 9pmET on WB is Veronica Mars -- which, along with Lost, is one of the two best new shows this season.

      Hey, I pay for /. and not the commercials.

    6. Re:How do you separate the two? by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1

      Whoops -- just noticed my mistake. Veronica Mars is on UPN at 9pmET, not WB. Doesn't change the sentiment, though.

  115. mythTV rocks by fulana_lover · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have a mythTV with 500GB of attached storage and it just rocks... I originally owned a tivo (added 80GB to it), loved it, but didn't want yet-another-monthly-bill after that tivo died and wanted something where I can dump my DVD collection with either a DVD jukebox or massive storage. its absolutely brilliant, no monthly fees, I get CVS builds once every few weeks, I have a nice quiet Antec Sonata case hidden away, and I have over 200 DVDs I ripped using mythTV so I can watch them whenever I want, however I want. LOL i use mythTV more for the ripped DVDs than TV, I probably only watch 3-4 hours of recorded TV per week (daily show, 24, amazing race, will & grace). The only improvement to mythTV I hope to see is picture quality... imo the PVR-250/350s that most people use for recording isn't the highest quality, I think my Tivo had slightly better TV quality and much, much faster channel changing while watching live. Hopefully a next generation of HDTV PC cards will come out without silly cap'ing problems and we will all be happy :)

  116. Re:Advantage of TiVo over MythTV is STILL too grea by wealthychef · · Score: 1

    Ooops! I just RTFM'd... sorry, MythTV DOES support IR blasters. I am so checking this out right freaking now. Ok, soon. Thanks. /.!
    Now if only it would work with OS X... anybody know about this?

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  117. Actually that isn't quite true by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1
    When you pay for cable you are not paying for the content on the TV (with the exception of premium channels) you are paying for the delivery of the channels.

    When you pay for cable TV, the cable company has to pay the networks a 'per subscriber' fee, which needless to say the cable company passes on to you.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  118. Let's put this another way... by Theovon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These days, companies are finding it harder and harder to stay in business. It's a bad economy. In a better economy, there would be more TiVo customers, and they would be able to make enough revenue, but unfortunately, every company, and TiVo is no exception, is finding it hard to make ends meet.

    We're used to hearing about how greedy companies are. And there are plenty of them, with Microsoft being their poster-boy. But when you're a company with real competition, then you're walking a fine line between making enough income and selling at a competitive price. It's hard to balance. Apple is one of the few companies that seems to be able to charge a premium with impunity.

    I'm not saying I know for SURE that TiVo is struggling financially, but given the statistics, they probably are. Making that assumption, they are faced with a choice between increasing what they charge customers or finding some OTHER way of increasing revenue. Selling banner ad space is just such an alternative.

    Frankly, I suspect that most people would prefer to see an unintrusive banner appear when fast-forwarding than to have to pay a higher monthly fee.

    1. Re:Let's put this another way... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Making that assumption, they are faced with a choice between increasing what they charge customers or finding some OTHER way of increasing revenue.

      There are 2 sides to the equation. They could reduce cost. They've tried, for sure, but probably not hard enough. This page indicates that TiVO's CEO makes $600,000. That's a lot of banner ads.

    2. Re:Let's put this another way... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      So as a customer it suddenly becomes my duty to help them make ends meet with a service I'm already paying them for? I think not.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:Let's put this another way... by Theovon · · Score: 1

      Heh... it's a world of greedy companies and cheap-ass customers.

      Reducing cost is VERY HARD TO DO. Trust me, I've been part of a company that's grown and then down-sized, and it's much easier to grow than to return to the size you once were.

      When you grow, you develop infrastructure that's hard to tear down when you have to shrink. Companies very often make the wrong sacrifices because they always want to be optimistic about continuing as they have been or contining to grow "just around the corner".

      I suppose you can't understand it unless you've been part of the process.

    4. Re:Let's put this another way... by jsgates · · Score: 1

      If you want to keep using their service, yes. You can do this, pay a higher fee, or drop the subscription.

    5. Re:Let's put this another way... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      That's funny. I pointed out only one item where they could cut cost, and you went on about how hard it is to cut cost. How hard would it be for the CEO to give up $400,000 of his pay? Quite simple, I would hope.

      I understand that cutting operating costs is quite difficult. Cutting ridiculous executive compensation seems like it should be a walk in the park, by comparison, no?

    6. Re:Let's put this another way... by Theovon · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you are in a position to judge whether or not the CEO of TiVo really deserves a salary that high.

      $600,000 is drop in the bucket compared to their yearly revenue, and it's a small price to pay for someone whose job it is to keep a big company running smoothly.

    7. Re:Let's put this another way... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you are in a position to judge whether or not the CEO of TiVo really deserves a salary that high.

      I am. Let's assume for the worst case that he works 8,760 hours/yr. That means he is making ~$68/hr, whether he's working, sleeping, eating, fucking, or taking a shit. That's ridiculous.

      Simply put, I am not a believer in large executive salaries. If TiVO wants to pay him that money, that's fine with me, but it's still absurd from my point of view, and I'll judge it from whatever position I'm in. Note that I said salary, not compensation. I'm a believer in performance-based compensation. I'm not a believer in paying a CEO millions in salary when the company they run is bleeding money and the real workers are getting laid off.

      it's a small price to pay for someone whose job it is to keep a big company running smoothly.

      He's obviously not doing that good a job if they have to completely shift their revenue model to advertisment-based.

      $600,000 is drop in the bucket compared to their yearly revenue

      True. Based on 2 million subscribers at $12.95/month, its only 0.2% of their yearly revenue. That's a conservative figure, since there are many lifetime subscribers. I would also hazard a guess that TiVO, like Microsoft and the XBox, sell the hardware at a loss.

      However, my original point is that they probably haven't looked everywhere to cut costs. You don't need a big cut in one area to save money. You can make many smaller cuts and still save a lot of money. So, cutting executive salaries, along with other smaller cost cuts, such as increases in productivity and restructuring internal procedures could make up for the revenue they're looking to get from advertisments. Whether this is actually possible, I am certainly not in the position to say.

  119. Thank You, Industry Apologist by arnasobr · · Score: 1

    The "fixed block of advertising is the lifeblood of content providers" line is getting old. For decades, product placement WITHIN content has been gaining ground. Have you seen a $100 MM+ movie lately? The Mini and Dorritos ads are quite visible, but not irrating enough to repulse viewers.

    The future holds two options: pay-per-view on-demand content, and free content with integrated product placement.

  120. who redirected slashdot.org to theonion.com? by cliffski · · Score: 1

    this must be an onion story right?
    i mean... come on.... this aint real?

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
  121. Where does TiVo's consumers benefit? by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will I get cheaper monthly service fees for my Tivo because their costs will be offset by *shudder* these banner ads?

    Granted, if TiVo needs the ad revenue to stay solvent, I guess it's necessary (the TiVo is doorstop without the service, well sorta =))

    But they might be shrinking their market to tap these new ad based revenue streams, which will make the ad placements be worth less...

    Apparently it won't be cable companies clumsy DVR's, or even us diy PVR'ers (shameless plug), or dillution of "brand/identity" that kills TiVo... it will be TiVo killing TiVo with practices and commitments that aren't in their CONSUMERS best interest.

    Why would someone who buys a special box and pays a monthly (or lifetime) service fee to skip commercials put up with replacement commercials during the commercial skipping process?!?! Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!

    Furthermore what advertiser in their right mind would want to reach people that ADD and disposition makes them actively adverse to ads? And if tivo's DVR/PVR share decreases what will those banner ads be worth to the advertisers then?

    Will DirecTivo's be effected by this change? (and will this hasten DirecTV's dance away from TiVo specific DVRs?)

    *Shrug*

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  122. Seriously, NO. I hate commercials. by aug24 · · Score: 1

    I want to be able to subscribe to channels X, Y and Z and pay for content without commercial interruptions.

    In this country (UK), that is simply not allowed. My cable provider (NTL) even bundles free-to-air content into pay-to-view bundles and there's nothing I can do about it. Sky does the same and costs even more. Luckily, for free-to-air shows, there's always p2p as I reckon that free-to-air stuff is also free-to-download ;-)

    Till I can buy content a-la-carte, I will fast forward every single commercial, not to save time (I often pause shows to chat about interesting bits to my SO - drives her mad!) but because the ads are intrusive and spoil the program.

    Plus, if these 'banner' ads have any sound, I'll be even madder, and I'll be building a MythTV too.

    Ads are soooooooo 20th century... I was asked by a marketeer about an ad at the cinema a bit ago. The question was "Does the fact that the girl in the ad owns a XXX make you feel anything about that model car". WTF? No, of course it doesn't.

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  123. Agreed Reloaded by lastberserker · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That's 45 minutes of my life to do productive things (or surf Slashdot).
    Yeah, just like buying some $500 piece of crap you don't need for $100 saves you $400 off MSRP. Why not skip both Amazing Race and Jon Stewart and save 1:45 to do productive things (or surf Slashdot)? ;-)
    --
    My other Beowulf cluster is... er...
  124. Some points. by LazyBoy · · Score: 1
    1. This would actually be pretty effective. There are shows that only get minimal attention while I'm multitasking. But when I'm fast forwarding over the commercial, I have to look at the screen to see when I'm done!

    2. They'd better leave enough of the commercial that we can tell when to stop fast forwarding.

    3. This could only work if the same advertiser played payed for the "popup" right? They couldn't get away with clobbering an ad with someone elses even in fast forward, could they?

    --

    If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

  125. Skipping the commercials by wbtittle · · Score: 3, Funny

    This just in: "A new bill being lobby for in congress will make it illegal for you to leave your television off." Providers of entertainment, in desperate need of more money intend to enable police officers to detain you for not watching television.

    --
    God: "I don't leave footprints!"
    1. Re:Skipping the commercials by jpetts · · Score: 1

      From "1984":

      Winston turned a switch and the voice sank somewhat, though the words were still distinguishable. The instrument (the telescreen, it was called) could be dimmed, but there was no way of shutting it off completely.

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    2. Re:Skipping the commercials by sabat · · Score: 1

      Shit, we're more than halfway there. The Tali-Bush use 1984-speak (er, NewSpeak) all the time ("we've got to go to war to win the peace"); all that's left is for Rumsfeld to rename his dept. the Ministry of Peace, and I think we're about there.

      --
      I, for one, welcome our new Antichrist overlord.
  126. Good reason not to go with "Lifetime" option. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    This makes me glad that I didn't opt for the "lifetime" subscription option. First, because if TiVO does become annoyingly intrusive, at least I haven't been cheated out of a lifetime subscription.

    Secondly, if this actually does lower the monthly cost, it makes the lifetime subsription less of a bargain.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  127. Cost will likely not go down by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I doubt they'll lower the cost; they'll just consider this a way to lower losses.

    I'd own a second (and possibly third) Tivo if I didn't have to buy subscriptions for all of them. That's just lunacy, especially when the two other units could just copy the data from one of the units, in effect costing Tivo zero in delivery costs.

    If the banner ads are a problem, I'll just keep using my 2nd gen standalone until it craps out and then rent (for $5 per month) a hidef PVR from the cable company. It'll suck more than the Tivo, but it'll record Hidef (satellite HDTivo isn't an option where I live) and I won't have any money sunk into the hardware.

    Among Tivo's many idiotic decisions are wasting too much development effort on non-core features (such as MP3s and photos), failure to deliver more core features (batch save/play), no cablecard-based unit on the horizon (HD recording, no IR blasting for digital cable channels), and little if any evolution of the hardware (firewire disk expansion and DVD-R add-ons).

    Adding banner ads is just another stupid decision on their part to cover up the other stupid decisions on their part.

  128. What is T.V.? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't recognize those initials. Turner Velodrome, did he buy a bike racing track in Georgia? True Value, a hardware store company, who I thought was Ace?

    Anyway, this discussion was concerning television, usually known by its abbreviation, TV. Maybe you posted to the wrong forum.

  129. Time for cheap, generic PVRs by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's about time for the cheap, generic PVRs from China to start appearing. Pure product, no service, price around $79 and dropping.

  130. I love the skip button by AGTiny · · Score: 1

    I love the undocumented 30 second skip feature of the Motorola DCT-6208 (and 6412) ;)

    I thought Tivo had a skip key too? Or were they also forced to remove or hide it?

    1. Re:I love the skip button by CatOne · · Score: 1

      select play select 3 0 select

      there it is ;-)

  131. please don't wake up by Cyno · · Score: 1

    my next PVR will run MythTV -- unless HR2391 passes and makes me a criminal for skipping commercials.

    If HR2391 passes I'll consider buying a gun and entertaining myself at the firing range. I bet if several million TV watching couch potatoes did something like that it would send a very clear message to everyone who wants to make everything illegal. They remember our history. Could you imagine how scared they would be if target practice suddenly became the nations favorite method of entertainment?

    I bet they'd want to give you commercial-free cable TV for free, anything to keep you sedated.

  132. Seen it all before.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    More commercials, Yahoo clunky, Netscape slow... more commercials, Fox, recording ever more commercials, Media Center competition - DEATH!!!

    I guess I'm simply going to watch "buffered TV" from the day before, as I simply don't want to spend 50% of my time watching commercials.

    Google seem to be the only company that hasn't continuesly tightened the "commercial screw"

  133. random thought, TiVo spyware? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    How is this different than gator, spyware, et al replacing banner ads on your browser with different/competitor's ads (and similiar shennanigans)?

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  134. Can Tivos still be bought in the UK? by bgeek · · Score: 0

    I need a pvr in my life. help apprectiated. best pvr available in the uk? (cost/performance/etc)

  135. Excellent idea by cparisi · · Score: 1

    I think this is great. Anything that helps TiVo stay in business is good. It is not the advertising that annoys be anyway. It is the time taken for the commercials.

  136. This pisses me off by dstar5 · · Score: 1

    Now this _really_ pisses me off. I am just now getting a TiVo for christmas, and now it goes bad...

  137. Blipverts are fine.... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    Until people start exploding right and left...

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  138. Huh? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
    With the rise of SSRIs, people won't get enough. They'll just go on with life and 'not worry' about their rights being taken away.


    Ummm, I must be missing your point here ...

    Are you saying we'll all be given Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) (eg antidepressants and the like) to make sure we're all a bunch of drooling happy people who don't mind commercials?

    Wow, what a future we have to look forward to. :-P

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  139. I make more money with AdSense than subscriptions by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    But if my AdSense revenue goes away, I'll go back to subscriptions. I even have my pages set so that ads only appear a fraction of the time (50-80%) which cuts down on ad impressions and actually increases revenue.

    Making Sense of Google AdSense

    You can't adblock your way out of subscriptions. There is no bandwidth fairy. It costs content providers real money to host things.

    You're either going to allow the advertisers to pay for the costs by "suffering" through some ads or pay for it yourself.

    Lots of major sites already are going to the dual model of free content and paid premium content.

    The money has to come from somewhere. Either the provider is rich (or the web-site is cheap to run) and willing to cover all the costs themselves, the advertisers cover costs, or the visitors cover costs.

    Most big sites pick one of the last two.

    Ben

  140. WTF? by BryanR1977 · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, I misssed the "Slashdot: Tivo FUD for nerds. Biased idiots that think they matter." heading. Seriously what the hell is up with the constant stream of "Tivo's gonna die, they are evil and are going to kill your babies" posts here. Honestly I've been a tivo owner for years, they have it figured out, there is No other DVR UI that I have used that is so simple and intuitive. Targeted ads, like the ones currently available in the tivo menu are A-OK with me. I'd rather have a banner ad for Porsche, Computer hardware, or the latest Sci-fi movie than site through another Kotex commercial.

  141. Better than a sharp poke in the eye... Or not. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "... I mean, its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding, and "free tv" needs some sort of revenue."

    I think my brain just exploded. One of the key points TiVo had in it's favor was skipping those advertisements. That, and you're already paying for a subscription. Are they just going to drop that now too? For somtehing that should have been free to begin with? I mean you're already shelling out for the hardware itself and it isn't that cheap.

    I'm sorry, but contrary to the submitter of this story, there is no way I could have ever bought one of these devices from a company looking to milk their consumers so damn much. It's like XBOx Live. It's not free because they're money whores, no other reason.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  142. Not so bad, Maybe by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

    What makes commercials so annoying isn't that you are being advertised to, but that you are being advertised to INSTEAD of doing what you want, and you have to sit there and wait and wait and wait to get back to the activity you were trying to do. If you hold in the fast forward button for 20 seconds, then a 20 second banner ad during that wouldn't be that annoying. But if the system slows down your fast forwarding so you have time to watch, say, a 1 minute commercial instead of spending just 20 seconds fast-forwarding, THEN customers will get pissed and leave in droves. If it doesn't change the rate of fast forwarding, AND it doesn't ruin functionality by obscuring too much of the screen, then I don't think there will be much customer backlash. (It would be annoying if you saw the ad INSTEAD of being able to see your place in the material you are fast-forwarding through. I'm assuming this will be a banner across the bottom or something like that, not something that obscures teh whole screen.)

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    1. Re:Not so bad, Maybe by nsayer · · Score: 1

      I don't mind if it obscures the whole screen, so long as it is just like the 'thumbs up' stuff they do now - it only occupies the amount of time the replaced commercial occupies. So long as they do not alter the fast-forward speed or insert extra commercial time, I'm fine with it.

      My understanding is that, for example, Lexus will be buying the rights to have a billboard replace a fast-forwarded Lexus ad. That doesn't bother me in the least. Since I don't like to pay HALF as much for a car as Lexus charges, I'll ignore the billboards the same way I ignore the blur that once was a 30 second Lexus commercial.

  143. The real problem with television advertising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that it has increased to the point where there is as much advertising as content. At one time, there was maybe 5 minutes of advertising in an hour. Now it seems like there is 30 minutes of advertising in an hour.

    It really wouldn't take much to convince me that there was a link between ADD and television commercials.

    If the television folks weren't trying to abuse us with the advertising, people wouldn't bother skipping the comercials.

  144. So let me see if I have this straight by lightspawn · · Score: 1

    When you watch commercials with a TiVo, there will be additional information displayed, maybe just "press thumbs-up for more information and a chance to win etc etc".

    If you fast forward through this commercial you will still see that information, but of course for a shorter time.

    At any rate, the information will be tied to the commercial you're currently viewing.

    Where's the story here?

    The original article seems to have little to do with the slashdot story reporting it. It's almost like the FUD microsoft spreads about Linux, but since here we all love TiVos (or don't watch TV at all) it can't be intentional.

    Dear slashdot, please correct the factual errors in the original article.

    "You must be new here" comments are not solicited at this time.

    1. Re:So let me see if I have this straight by jamie · · Score: 1

      If you point out a factual error, I will be happy to correct it.

    2. Re:So let me see if I have this straight by lightspawn · · Score: 1

      The article is titled "TiVo to Sell Your Fast-Forward Button" - but it has nothing to do with fast forwarding, or rewinding. The extra content is displayed to supplement an existing commercial, and is displayed for as long as the actual commercial is displayed (or possibly a little less). The article makes it sound like that horrid cable provider which displays banner ads for insurance, flowers and other completely unrelated products for a minimum of three seconds whenever you switch channels.

      So, "TiVo to augment TV commercials with interactive content" would be a much more accurate (but less scandalous) title.

  145. May not be a problem by BobaFett · · Score: 1

    Depends how the implementation ends up looking like:
    Option 1: out of the jumbled mess, which is how all playback looks like at 30X, a small portion is less jumbled. Fine, whatever, I wasn't watching it anyway, just as long as I can see when the movie resumes.
    Option 2: enough of the screen is covered up so it't hard to see when to stop fast-forwarding. That would be bad, unless TiVo also added some features to help stop the fast-forward on time, like automatic detection of the end of the commercial.
    Option 3: every time I fast-forward the box plays some extra ads. That's evil.

    Fortunately, option 3 is almost certain to be challenged in courts, and may be option 2 as well: the advertizers and the networks will sue for effectively replacing their ads with TiVo's ads, similarly to how web advertisers sued when some companies tried to do a similar thing with web pages (stick code into browsers to float their ads over the original ads).

    1. Re:May not be a problem by nsayer · · Score: 1

      The way I read the article it's either option 2, but with this modification:

      They're going to put the billboards over individual ads only. That is, a billboard for Smirnoff will appear only over a Smirnoff ad. Sort of like the way the Thumbs Up stuff works today. Thus, they could have the billboard cover the whole screen and it won't make it more difficult to spot the end of the commercial break, since the billboard would have gone away by then. The billboard will, for a 30 second commercial, last a bit longer than 4 seconds. I'm betting marketers will be quite happy to pay to stick a 4 second still print-like ad under your nose, even if you do ignore it.

    2. Re:May not be a problem by BobaFett · · Score: 1

      Interesting... How are they going to pull it off? Schedules soutinely slip by a couple of minutes, and sometimes sports wreck total havock. So they cannot sync up their billboards with original ads by timing, otherwise they will one day show Smirnoff billboard over Ford's ad. They would need the broadcasters to embed some marker into the signal... I can see a market for devices which strip such markers from the video signal, similarly to the Macrovision removal boxes.

    3. Re:May not be a problem by nsayer · · Score: 1

      They use codes in the Vertical Blanking Interval - somewhat like closed captioning.

  146. Abstaining not always feasible by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    BS. If you don't like the product, don't buy it. Sounds like you no longer like the TiVo product. Don't buy it.
    *sigh* Even outside of the arguments all over this discussion about people who have bought the units or have lifetime subscriptions, there's also the fact that a lot of people like this service. They believe that this is a short-term profit solution, possibly created by someone who plans to leave for another job before things crash, having reaped profits. Because they care, they complain.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  147. Moxi by duranaki · · Score: 1

    I have this moxi pvr (also Tivo on another tv) and unlike tivo, moxi really *has* sold my ff button. I tried to ff through a PPV Fight (PPV!!! meaning I PAID to VIEW) and it gave me an error pop-up saying that wasn't allowed. So yes, Moxi is supporting some kind of goofy program-based command disabling. Now THAT's annoying...
    This Tivo change doesn't seem like such a big deal to me.

  148. You must be new here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is slashdot: FUD for nerds. Propaganda that matters.

  149. Why use Tivo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both cable companies in my area offer a DVR service. It only costs $13.00 more a month for the service and DVR rental. No ads, and it works just like Tivo. I live in a rural town in Eastern NC, so I figured most places would have this availible.

  150. dying financial model by geoff+lane · · Score: 1

    Commercial TV started to die the day the remote control was invented.

    From that day, people could avoid the ads without leaving the chair, and they did so.

    1. Re:dying financial model by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      I find it awesome that the digital age is truly coming into being and many revenue models of the past are beginning to feel the pain.. most notably the music industry and the television industry. I mean, just to sit back and watch it all occur from a distance is pretty incredible. How will these two industries adapt to the new environment? Will new companies swoop in and dominate the new landscape? Man..! Economic evolution in progress! How sweet it is. Now, if we cuold get Congress out of the mix and let things run a bit less inhibited.

  151. TV networks should sue TiVo by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Interesting

    TiVo is essentially capturing a TV signal, filtering out the original advertising, and replacing it with their own. If this isn't IP theft, I don't know what is. The TV networks and their advertisers should sue, and if they do, they should win.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:TV networks should sue TiVo by Hollins · · Score: 1

      TiVo doesn't do any filtering. All the original ads are captured by the unit and it is up to the user to select playback speed based on context, so this isn't any different from recording with a VCR and fast-forwarding through commercials, just more convenient. If you fast forward with a VCR, you usually see an icon overlayed on the screen indicating the action. Is this 'IP theft', also, since the original broadcast is being modified?

    2. Re:TV networks should sue TiVo by jbarr · · Score: 1

      Um, hello? Did you RTFA? TiVo is not filtering out the original advertizing and replacing it with their own! They are providing an "overlay" banner paid for by the advertizer of the commercial being aired. They aren't doing ANYTHING new except increasing the size and interactivity of their existing "Thumbs Up Tag", and this certainly isn't IP theft. Please RTFA before you accuse TiVo of doing something they are not doing.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  152. Open Source / Free software Tivo by Free_Trial_Thinking · · Score: 1


    I am always wondering when will the open source/free software community stand up and start making their own hardware. Personal computers are so 1990s, it's great that they're standardized and fairly open, but let's not forget about the computers of the future, cell phones, Tivos and the like. Creating an free OS for the the personal computer will only be a small victory if all of the future computer platforms are closed and subject to the whims of corporations.

    --

  153. Will they remove 30-second skip? by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TiVos by default do not have any "quick jump" feature. You have to literally fast-forward through commercials. However, there's a widely-known code you type into the remote to turn on a 30-second instant skip feature. So when I skip commercials, I'm never fast-forwarding; I press the jump button 6 or 8 times and that's it. The whole thing takes like 3 seconds. As long as they don't remove that feature, super-anti-commercial people like me will still be happy.

    1. Re:Will they remove 30-second skip? by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      As long as they don't remove that feature, super-anti-commercial people like me will still be happy.
      Oh, ok. I'm sure they'll keep that feature in for you when they put in the paid advertizements during the regular fast forward. Don't worry at all.

  154. This sounds ridiculous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I remember an old Loony Tunes cartoon episode where Daffy Duck is a salesman to convert your house to a push button house and he was trying to sell it Porky Pig. There a button on the panel your not supposed to touch that was red but Porky Pig being curious pushed it and the whole house lifted to about 100 feet into the air and Daffy Duck wanted to sell Porky Pig a blue button to get the house down.
    Cartoons are humorous and sometime ridiculous but nowadays that are becoming reality and that is the problem.

  155. Two and a half words: by Sebby · · Score: 1
    Bait 'n switch

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  156. Not a bad idea. Really? by pcwhalen · · Score: 0

    Kids, think "breach of contract." I paid for a lifetime subscription. It included certain features. TiVo is seeking to take away one of those features from me without asking me.

    No party to a contract may unilateraly change it. Even if there is a clause in the contract allowing for any change TiVo wants, the contract would be unconscionable as one of adhesion and a court would disallow it.

    In other words, they probably can't legally do what they are doing. I'm sure no one will object to it, though....

    --
    Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain with all your metadata.
  157. TiVo is more than Commercial Skipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see the ability to skip commercials secondary to not missing shows. Granted, a VCR can do this but it has serious flaws. The TiVo allows me to not worry about having a tape ready and a timer set to record a show.

    This keeps me from having to panic and run home in the middle of a Dungeons and Dragons game to watch the next showing of Star Trek. In fact, not recording shows using a TiVo can be cost a life. As a dear friend of mine has become a case in point.

    Some time ago, before I owned a TiVo, my friends and I were in our Klingon characters waiting for a new episode of Star Trek to start. Anxious, we started to break stuff with our batliffs. Then General P'ocLow brought to our attention that Lieutenant Ykiouw was missing.

    "Where is Lieutenant Ykiouw?" we chanted in song as we drank grape-juice (Master Gunner Kinought was allergic to blood-wine, so we had to substitute). Eventually the episode started and we had no blank tapes available. Regretfully we began to watch the show without Lieutenant Ykiouw.

    As it turned out, Lieutenant Ykiouw was speeding through traffic to get to my mom's house in time to watch the show with us. He was late because he just attended his cousin's Right of Ascension. Delayed from the pain ceremony he was more angry than usual. And this perhaps, was the cause of his ultimate demise.

    Unfortunately, an inconsiderate motorist pulled out in front of him just before a stoplight and caused him to swerve and hit a light-post. Bound to defend his honor, he grabbed one of the Cisco routers in the back seat and proceeded to exit his vehicle. Standing next to his now (more) broken '82 Honda Accord, he raised the router high in his hands with dangling cables and screamed his fearsome war-cry.

    Now, Lieutenant Ykiouw was one of the more skilled warriors of our group. I have no doubt that he would have reclaimed his honor in glorious battle against the elderly woman who had shown such disregard for his status. However, blinded by his rage he failed to watch for oncoming traffic has he charged across the street dressed in his full Klingon makeup and clothing. The semi-truck driver in the dim light of dusk mistook him for a rabid Afghan dog running across the street. The driver didn't even try to stop.

    Until a few hours later we had no idea of the events that had transpired. We already had felt bad that Lieutenant Ykiouw missed the episode, the impromptu Klingon Tea Ceremony and subsequent orgy. After finding out we lost one mighty warrior, we learned how dearly important it is not to feel that an episode of Star Trek might be missed. We also learned after the fact, that Heklaa, sister of Teriok was the cause of us all getting genital warts that fateful evening.

    RIP Lieutenant Ykiouw 1963-1995

  158. MythTV as an alternative? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Well, instead of going the Tivo route to begin with, I built a MythTV box and used the Knoppix Myth ISO to install it.

    Let me tell you, if you're accustomed to the stability and reliability of a Tivo type device, you will NOT be happy with MythTV yet at all!

    The current Knoppix Myth release (R4V5) has some serious flaws in it, including:

    * MythWeather module often reports a "timeout error" while trying to collect current weather data, and makes you click a "retry" button to get your weather. (Seems like this started when they tried to add animated doppler radar map support.) This happens despite me being on a 3Mbit DSL connection, load-balanced with a second 3Mbit cable Inet connection - so I'm not exactly short on bandwidth!

    * Lots of struggling reported by various users getting the "ivtv" drivers in it working reliably and smoothly. I've tried compiling in various versions for my relatively basic Myth setup (Hauppage PVR-250 card and GeForce 4TI 4600 video card in a Pentium 4 1.8Ghz system w/512MB RAM) and I still get everything from occasional glitches in the video to the whole thing freezing up and requiring a reboot to return to normal operation.

    * Free TV guide data Myth utilizes (via zap2it.com) is lacking in several ways. Primarily, pay-per-view events on satellite TV are not detailed at all. They all simply say "PPV event" in the listing.

    * If you're like most users, wanting to use MythTV with a cable box or Dish Network satellite receiver, you'll have to build your own "IR Blaster" (I.R. LED soldered to some wire and a serial port connector), so your Myth box can pretend its a remote control and change the channels on the receiver. This wasn't terribly difficult or very expensive to make, but it's just another additional hassle to keep in mind. Some receivers don't catch all the digits sent too well either, requiring you fiddle with timing values in the script to get it working reliably.

    1. Re:MythTV as an alternative? by geckofiend · · Score: 1
      Let me tell you, if you're accustomed to the stability and reliability of a Tivo type device, you will NOT be happy with MythTV yet at all!

      Conversely, my main Myth box runs 24/7 without issue and only goes down when the power fails or I install a new revision of Myth.

      MythWeather module often reports a "timeout error" while trying to collect current weather data,

      Nice of you to report that to the developers so that the default timeout can be increased. Oddly enough, it doesn't time out for me via dialup.

      Free TV guide data Myth utilizes (via zap2it.com) is lacking in several ways. Primarily, pay-per-view events on satellite TV are not detailed at all. They all simply say "PPV event" in the listing.

      You mean just like Tivos? Since it's the SAME data Tivo recieves for non Directivo boxes the comparison fails.

      If you're like most users, wanting to use MythTV with a cable box or Dish Network satellite receiver, you'll have to build your own "IR Blaster"
      This is the came control mechanism that Tivo uses so again what's the big deal. There's ZERO reason to build one, there are several IR transmitters and recievers available to buy.

  159. hacked tivo box by demon4 · · Score: 0

    a hacked tivo box can do some of the things myth tv can do (add bigger hd, look at pictures, rss, weather, setup ftp server) http://javahmo.sourceforge.net/screenshots.html. but a lot of the hacking seems like too much trouble to get it to work. I like my myth tv box, works great, can network it to my other computer easily with samba, can play divx/xvid/mp3/etc, and supports transcoding. Myth can be installed easily using KnoppMyth. Hoping to put a hd tuner card in there when i get some $$.

  160. Make your TiVo "ReadOnly" by SurfTheWorld · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I own 3 TiVO's and have modified them with larger disks, network connectivity, and video extraction capability. I've been doing this since I bought my first TiVO in Fall 2000.

    One of the primary drawbacks to root'ing your TiVO was that the next time a software update was transmitted from the magic entertainment boob in the sky, all your hard work would be erased, as the update would wipe the OS install clean (usually).

    While my work in the TiVO community has dwindled significantly in the past months, I did happen to take note of a warning that said something to the effect of "Disable Remote Update". I'm not certain what this feature of the hack does, but it sounds (at least from the name) that it would not allow TiVO or DTV to upgrade your TiVO's OS from 3.1 to 3.x in the future.

    I'm going to go look into that option now. But I think that if you really feel strongly about TiVO and DTV whoring themselves to the ad-nipple in California, you might want to invest a Saturday afternoon in root'ing your TiVO so that you won't receive this unwanted feature.

    -c

    --
    Do it for da shorties
    1. Re:Make your TiVo "ReadOnly" by triffidsting · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what I understand however, this only applies to Series 1 boxes. Series 2 box owners are SOL, as they are not as "friendly."

      --
      Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
    2. Re:Make your TiVo "ReadOnly" by mabu · · Score: 1

      If you're running Tivo with DTV, you never need to plug the unit in and have it "phone home" and update. If you're doing PPV stuff, maybe, but with the satellite versions of Tivo, I've had my unit unplugged for more than a year and it works fine.

  161. Re:Advantage of TiVo over MythTV is STILL too grea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could certainly run the (Qt) frontend on OS X (against the GPLed Qt available there). The backend is quite dependent on Video4Linux (v4l), so I don't think you'd have much luck there.

    My suggestion, however, is to run both the frontend and backend on GNU/Linux (possibly on the same machine); you could always run an _additional_ watch-only frontend on your personal OSX box.

  162. ReplayTV has tried PauseAds but we can block them! by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    I've got a ReplayTV, and the last few software revisions have allowed "PauseAds," which they tested by having a contest screen for a few weeks. However, we have community-based software available that will sit between our boxen and the Replay servers, that so far can turn these off, along with all the other cool stuff it does. They've never actually tried to have real ads, as far as I know.

  163. Oh, the irony! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You people need to get a life. "

    This, coming from someone defending commercials.

    People pay for cable. They pay for Tivo, they pay for their Tivo subscription.

    And now they have to watch even more ads.

    Its like getting raped and being forced to pay for the lube.

    1. Re:Oh, the irony! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the bright side, at least you get the lube!

  164. FF is for newbs by BalloonMan · · Score: 1

    I don't fast forward on my TiVo, I use the 30-second skip button. That's the easter egg you access by pressing "SELECT PLAY SELECT 3 0 SELECT", which makes the "->|" button into something useful. Six clicks on the skip button and 3 minutes of commercials are excised with barely a moment's distraction. Yeah, I have to use the 10-second backskip once or twice, but it still beats straining to watch ultra-fast video looking for the end of the adverts.

    If they ever take this away, the TiVo's go in the trash (figuratively) and MythTV will probably be the new option.

  165. Time to hack the tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have two Directtivo's that I haven't gotten around to hacking, yet. It looks like it's just about time, so that I don't have to phone home, nor will I have to watch the banner ads.

  166. oh well. by DaveJay · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Once upon a time, I watched little to no TV -- and by that, I mean I watched a Simpson's episode once every few weeks, and that was it.

    Then TiVo came along (my wife, who watches TV, wanted it) and I was totally drawn in. Freed from having to pay attention to programming schedules and whatnot, and given the ability to pause live TV and skip commercials, I started watching more TV. Now, a weekly roster includes NASCAR racing, three or four programs from the Cartoon Network, the Daily Show, and other tidbits.

    Then, several months ago, TiVo tried a new kind of advertisement wherein an interstitial ad popped up when you tried to reach the main menu, asking you if you wanted to find out more, or continue on to the menu. It infuriated me (and others in public forums) because it put the advertising in the way of the menu I was trying to access, which was highly intrusive.

    I was ready to get rid of TiVo at that point, but evidentally the TiVo folks got a lot of flak for it, because the next ad showed up as a link in the main menu instead -- and I decided it was acceptable since I could safely ignore it.

    Well, my jury's still out on this one. If the ads are merely visual annoyances that can be ignored (I do, after all, watch NASCAR, so I'm used to it) I'll continue the service, but if the ads in any way interfere with the usability of the device, I think I'm done.

    And that, at the end of the day, would be a good thing. It's too easy to forget that TV is a toy, not a necessity.

  167. that's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tivo, if you're even bothering to listen i'm done. the road you're going down is oneway and downhill as far as i'm concerned. i do not want to watch "other" stuff, only what i chose and when i chose. mythtv, here i come.

    br.
    tivo management, i think that you're a bunch of assholes.

  168. Ooooh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You are downloading copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright owner"

    Right and going 60 MPH on most highways is illegal too.

    Big deal.

  169. I know this is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Watching tv while circumventing the commercials *is* theft"

    Funny, but your mom said that having sex without paying her is stealing too.

    But afterwards, I couldn't help but thinking that even a dollar is overcharging.

  170. Problem with skipping commercials by Hrvat · · Score: 1

    The problem with people skipping commercials is that eventually companies will not want to pay as much for commercial space. Which will mean lower revenue for the network, which will in turn lead to either
    A) more commercials per hour, or
    B) increased cost to cable customers.

    The core problem here is that by being exposed to commercials you are partially paying for content being delivered to your box. By making it easier to skip commercials (not everyone wants to flip the channel or get up off the couch during commercial) you devalue the seconds devoted to advertising.

    How should we solve this? I don't know. Premium channels avoid commercials by charging for content directly. Possible answer would be to make more channels "premium" as in: "Pay a buck more if you want Comedy Central". Cable companies might object to that since bundling unwanted channels makes you pay for content you are not using. I mean, can you really watch more than one channel at a time (if you have only one TV)?

    --
    TANSTAAFL
  171. BitTorrent Instead of TIVO by hal2814 · · Score: 1

    I'm testing now using BitTorrent to get all of my family's shows. I will be missing sports but the torrents are better quality than the satellite feeds I'm getting and commercials are already edited out. I can then play the shows as I want to on my computer with TV out. It's been working great as of week 1 of my experiment. In week 2, we're going to try watching everything but NFL and NCAA Football from the torrents. So far, it doesn't look like that will be much of a challenge. I'll be a day behind on shows, but I'm not too concerned about that. I can get used to watching the Simpsons on Mondays.

  172. Maybe I Missed Something, But... by eufreka · · Score: 1
    Let me see if I have this right...

    I am fastforwarding through commercials and yet TiVo is *SHOWING* me a commercial?!?!?!?

    When fastforwarding at a minimum 2x, how can they show me a commercial and yet let me see when to stop fastforwarding and go back to my show? (How do they know how long a commercial to show?)

    Given that it is, after all, digital content; does this mean that TiVo will deliberately slowdown the FF to allow time to show commercials? I mean, if I am using 30-sec skip, how CAN they show a commercial?

    And when they are (technically) showing commercials ON TOP OF the paid advertisers commercials (thus obscuring them), aren't they treading into the realm of "taking" the broadcasters IP?

    Quite frankly, we are all at odds with one another: viewers seeking ways to escape ads, and everyone else trying to show us ads. No way is this going to work out well for TiVo. Since when has anyone even had longterm success trying to BRIBE people to watch ads?

    This is undoubtedly the first nail in TiVo's coffin (and I own 3 units).

    Worse, this is the first real sign of the merging worlds of internet and broadcast--it's the same issue in both cases.

  173. Door Number 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "If this isn't IP theft, I don't know what is."

    I would judge the 2nd part of this statement to be the case.

  174. Skipping the commercials breaks TV revenue model by LordByronStyrofoam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Expecting something for nothing is not a new concept but doesn't scale well. Skipping commercials is a technological response to an economic problem, and won't legitimately work. If we want commercial-free programming, the money's gotta come from someone other than advertisers. While I'd like being able to skip the commercials, and could set up a MythTV box to do so, the economic model can't support everyone doing so.

    Until we adopt pay-tv like Great Britain, in the American model of TV economics it's those pesky commercials that pay for the non-premium programming.

    --
    Slashdot's name? When my compiler sees /. it generates a warning about a badly formed comment.
  175. What doe s HR 2391 Have to do with this?? by spotteddog · · Score: 1

    I just looked up HR 2391 on Thomas . I don't see anything that addresses recording broadcast programming and skipping commercials. The only thing mentioned seems to be recording movies in a movie theater.

    I did note that HR 2391 got a lot bigger when the senate got the resoultion after the house passed it.

    --
    . there used to be a sig here.....
    1. Re:What doe s HR 2391 Have to do with this?? by spotteddog · · Score: 1

      OK, Section 212 deals with the topic, but creates and EXEMPTION FROM INFRINGEMENT for skipping audio or video content in motion pictures.

      IANAL, but as long as the TIVO records the entire broadcast, and the viewer presses the commercial skip button, I don't see a problem.

      --
      . there used to be a sig here.....
  176. TV shows are only a by-product by powdered+toast+dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It may surprise you to consider that producers of television entertainment are not in the business of delivering entertainment to consumers.

    They are in the business of delivering consumers to advertisers.

    Delivering entertainment to consumers is simply a side-effect of their reason for being in business -- it's just one means to achieve their purpose. As soon as it doesn't work, there's no reason for them to keep producing the side-effect (your shows) instead of looking for a better way to deliver your attention to advertisers.

    $0.02,
    ptd

    --
    I'm an animal lover -- they're delicious!
  177. Won't be buying a TiVo then... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    I think TiVo are really just covering their asses on this one. Its not exactly intrusive if its just a banner and it will go away as soon as you stop fast-forwarding. I think stations should conspire together to cut the number of hours of advertising - people don't like being constantly interrupted and the laws of supply and demand say that each advert slot will become more valuable if there are less of them, and each advert will have more of an impact if its less drowned out by all the others - so a total net gain for everyone except the advertising companies (but who gives a shit about them?).

    On UK terrestrial stations (atleast) theres a break every 15 minutes and in films usually more like one every 30mins, if they tried to push that futher people would do their nut. No-one wants to be constantly bombarded with the same adverts or things that have no interest to them, now the real smart thing TiVo could do is work with stations and get them to allow TiVo to play its own adverts during breaks instead - these would be specially selected to each viewers tastes, would have the 'thumbs up/down' option so people could give their opinion, they wouldn't repeat so much, and they'd make it easy for further interactions - eg instantly buying it (does the one-click patent cover that? oh well) finding out more, or texting the user when they happen to wander near that shop (if they said they were interested) etc. TiVo could even get away with say locking out the skip button for atleast 5 seconds in each advert as long as the user feels that they are being treated well and their input taken - if the user thumbs-down an advert then theres no business reason to waste money trying to show it to them another 15 times! Obviously various people get their cuts including TiVo, the entry level for advertising even on major stations would be low because you could for example, buy only 100 viewers instead of 1000's. everyone is happy, including the advertisers and the stations, and the viewers!

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  178. MythTV Linux only!? by BigTunaCan · · Score: 0

    I love Linux as much as the next person, but my power horse PC runs Windows. My Linux box is a laptop without a TV card. Is there a version of MythTV, or similar software, that runs on Windows?

  179. Oh, they're so desperate! by _iCeb0x_+(1337+and+k · · Score: 1

    These guys make me laugh... I don't know jack anout the US TV market, but here in Brazil, with the advent of the DVD, most people trashed their old and malfunctioning VCR's and still have got no replacement. I mean, most people don't have a way to record TV shows... DVD recorders are too expensive and they're simply not worth it. The VCR still seems to be tougher when it comes to rewritability. PVR's are so popular in the US? Or the MPAA and NAB (or whatever) are so desperately trying to stop people from digitally recording TV broadcasts before it's too late? I, for one, will record anything I want. I have DirecTV and I pay for that (I could find a way to have it for free, but I tend to be honest most of the time). I won't let go my right to watch a TV show that I paid for. That's why VCR's and PVR's exist: they provide a way for you to record show for later enjoyment! This is fair use and will always be. Now, for TV commercials... I like some of them. They even work with me and I have bought stuff because of TV ads. But I don't pay for these commercials. No one does it, except for the advertisers. If there's a law banning any ad-skipping feature and anti-fast-forward measures become a standard, I will hack my PVR, be it based on open source software or not. My rights should never change. What is good for me today will be good for me forever.

  180. Just as Yahoo! mail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They first sell you the idea of a "FREE FOR ALL" webmail. Then they start removing POP3 access, SMTP access, and what you get? Animated Flash banners while you're reading your mail.

    And no, I don't care how the heck that freaking Dew tastes! I don't have it in my country dammit!

    Well if these guys at Tivo start crippling their software, then I guess I'll make MY OWN. Or if I'm a cheapstake, then I'd go for the analog version.

    (Stupid government regulations... *mumbles*)

  181. Read the article please! by ibbey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, before you all go & cancel your subscriptions, you might want to READ THE DAMN ARTICLE. "TiVo viewers will see "billboards," or small logos, popping up over TV commercials as they fast-forward through them, offering contest entries, giveaways or links to other ads." Not quite the overwhelming barrage of advertising that some of you seem to be implying. Would I rather the ads weren't there? Sure. But I don't really care that they are.

    Contrary to what the post implies, people don't buy a Tivo to "avoid advertising". They buy it so they can watch shows how & when they want, and so that they can fast-forward through advertising. You can still fast-forward through the ads, you'll just be shown a logo on the screen during the ad you're fast-forwarding through. This will likely be no more intrusive then the "Record this program" logo that shows up one ads for certain TV programs already. Not the end of the world, really.

    Finally, I want to know, why is there such an overwhelming anti-Tivo sentiment on Slashdot? I understand the anti-Microsoft sentiment. But Microsoft is a company that makes frequently bad products, charges outrageous prices (that you really have no choice but to pay), offers lousy customer service, routinely violates anti-trust laws, Etc.. NONE of these really apply to Tivo. Some people object to their monthly fees, but if you don't like it you can feel free to build your MythTV box. But you'll probably end up spending considerably more in the long run, and be prepared for lot's more hassles, Oh, and your TV litings, though free, won't go as far in advance (last I checked xmltv only gave you one week of listings), and be prepared to upgrade xmltv at least every couple of months, sometimes twice a week (usually with no advance notice-- your listings just stop working).

    Tivo makes a solid, VERY well designed product. They sell it cheap, but charge a reasonable monthly fee to use the service. They're even reasonably supportive of the hacking community. Yes, they hope to make a profit in the process. What's really wrong with that?

  182. Re:Their Problem by atomicbirdsong · · Score: 0

    Paying for their crappy or not so crappy art projects seems to me is their problem. Not the government's or mine. Maybe they would like to give the air time back to the people. If Fox needs programming I have some ideas.

    I wish I could get some federal legislation that would require people to give me money for my crappy paintings.

    Maybe so many people wont just sit around watching crappy tv just because its free.

  183. Open Source TIVOOS!! DO IT! by telemonster · · Score: 1

    MythTV, Freevo get all this publicity, but the hardware required to run them is still a pain (PC, WinTV card, composite output).

    It's time to build a custom OS for the Tivo hardware platform!

    MythTivo!

    Series 2 tivo's seem to use the KFIR-II broadcom chipset, also used in the Pinnacle Bungee and already working under Linux. Series 2.5 seems to use custom Mips core, and odd hardware.

    Linux people, Tivo is not your friend. You don't owe them anything for "letting" you upgrade YOUR machine's disk to a larger drive.

    You are a customer of their service.

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  184. TIVO will get sued by timeOday · · Score: 1
    The problem is that the TIVO is NOT free. You paid for that device, and you paid for that service. Getting ads you don't want is a betrayal of the customer.
    Another problem is the ads you skipped weren't free either - to the advertisers. Will they accept their ads stripped out and others put in their stead? I doubt it very much.

    The old, customer-oriented Tivo was like a web browser with popup blockers, and nobody has been sued over popup blockers yet. Tivo's new ad-supported model is more like that browser hack that stripped the original ads and replaced them with other ads - and they DID get sued.

    Knowing some customers aren't watching your ads is bad enough, but knowing your competitors are paying much less to have your ads replaced with theirs will really make companies angry.

  185. Would you like to know more? by falser · · Score: 1

    It sounds an awful lot like the commercials in Starship Troopers. After every commercial they'd have that tagline. Should we expect the bugs to attack soon?

  186. Counteroffer by slapout · · Score: 1

    I've got a counter offer. How about this: I pay you a set amount of money every month, and you remove ALL commericals from my TV. How about that?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  187. Fast Forward Speeds by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

    TiVo has 3 fast forward speeds: 3X, 18X and 60X (source, TiVo FAQ). If you're skipping commercials at high speed, as I always do, a one minute commercial goes by in one second! How annoying can a pop-up ad be during that time?

    If everyone had PVRs and did this kind of skipping, advertisers could get the same effect by putting up a stationary box for the whole minute with their ad text, on part of the screen. It's not objectionable.

    The main new feature is that you can press a button and send in your name and address to request information about the product. TiVo has had opt-in ads accessible from their main menu like this for a year or more. These are high quality ads and I've used the opt-in occasionally, it's pretty nice.

    The big problem I see is that there is no time to react in one second and press a button to get more information. My guess is that this is targetted at the people who FF at 18X, who will have 3 seconds to react. Quick people like me won't be affected.

    Far more annoying are the banner ads which run across the bottom of regular programs, advertising upcoming shows (and sometimes products!). These have recently become noisy and drown out the dialog or add incongruous sound effects spoiling the scene. I expect the use of this kind of advertising to increase because you can't TiVo around it. Banners during commercials would be much less of a problem.

  188. I would pay *FOR* ads, here's why... by macslut · · Score: 1

    I would pay *FOR* ads, here's why... I've been asking for this feature for some time now. What I want are ads to display as a screensaver. If I'm watching Tivo and want to pause to answer the phone or do whatever, it would be nice to have the screen go into screensaver mode, and they might as well show ads (as long as they don't have burn in areas). Likewise when a show is finished, instead of sticking on the menu page, it would be nice if it went into a screensaver mode. Sure this would be nice if it showed my pictures or what not as an option, but personally, I wouldn't mind the fact that Tivo was making some money, and heck, they could be worthwhile ads. What worries me about fast forward ads is that they could distract from what one is trying to do (often just scanning content).

  189. Screw HR2391 or any act of Congress! by sadler121 · · Score: 1

    ...but my next PVR will run MythTV -- unless HR2391 passes and makes me a criminal for skipping commercials.

    Screw HR2391, as long as I have my encrypted tunnel to an off shore proxy server, I can download MythTV from anywhere, and they (the government, the RIAA, the MPAA, etc) wouldn't be the wiser.

    Honestly this doesn't effect *me* at all, I can get around these pesky little inconviences. Who this really effects is the average Joe who thinks the most important issue is restricting marriage to a certain class of people that is determined by gender. Once the other Americans who are asleep at the wheel see how fuck they really are *THEN* we might see some progress, but until then I can get by just fine, Act of Congress or no...

  190. Re:Agreed (NOT!) by RockClimb · · Score: 1

    I didn't start watching Amazing Race until 9:45pm last night. By 11:30 I had seen both Amazing Race and Jon Stewart -- without watching a single commercial. That's 45 minutes of my life to do productive things (or surf Slashdot).

    You have a valid point here, but what about this. Money talks. How long before the FF starts going a little slower so Tivo can sell a little more advertismet time? Your time saved may drop to 40 minutes, then 35... and so on. "Wait-and-see" is a great idea, but it still comes down to that good old talking money.

  191. TiVo Employee clarifies change (article misleads) by mkraft · · Score: 2, Informative
    From this post over at the TiVo Community TiVoPony (a TiVo Employee) states:
    I can tell you now - I expect you won't be bothered.

    The article mentions some improvements to our tagging capabilities. Nothing changes in terms of your ability to move through a show.

    The 'billboards', or new tags, can be interactive, just as Ipreview tags are today. While they can be larger than today's tags, you can always see what's going on. Your fast forwarding skills will not require revision.

    Ipreview tags have always displayed based on a 'tag' that is embedded into the broadcast signal, and this works the same way. No Pepsi billboards over Coke commercials. No spillovers into the program you're watching. It's all tied to tags built into, and timed to, the commercial being broadcast.

    And to state what's become old hat to many here - the article was very loose with it's description of TiVo and your privacy. TiVo does not know how many times *you* specifically watched Janet Jackson. We absolutely respect your privacy. Everything that is collected is both anonymous and aggregate. We know how many people watched a show, but not specifically which subscribers. The last quote in the article (just like the headline) made for a good soundbite...but is grossly misleading.

    Cheers, Pony
  192. TiVo does NOT remove commercials by mkraft · · Score: 1

    TiVo allows you to fast forward through commercials but it doesn't remove them.

  193. Commercials! by quarmar · · Score: 1

    How long until Microsoft adds commercials to their startup screen and BSOD?

  194. ReplayTV uses the pause screen for their OWN ads. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    They advertised a free unit givaway contest on that screen a number of months ago, and in the past week or so they placed an ad on a pause screen for a special deal on additional units for existing ReplayTV customers.

    I don't have a problem with ReplayTV using their own service for advertising as long as the ads are not intrusive, and their current method meets that criterion (IMO).

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  195. Its not just branding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Sony Trinitron Monitor has a Dell advertisement on it. What, you think its a Dell branded monitor?

  196. what about auto-skip? by mabu · · Score: 1

    I think this is relatively moot if you're like many Tivo users and you've enabled the unpublished 30s autoskip hack (S-P-S-3-0-S). When you press the skip button, it jumps exactly 30 seconds. You hit this 6-8 times during commercial breaks and you're back at your show; much faster than FF and you don't have to pay attention to the screen so who gives a damn what they're displaying?

    I am less interested in the fact they may want to run ads, as I am profoundly disappointed that this idea on the part of Tivo indicates that they are way, WAY out of touch with their customers' needs and desires, which doesn't bode well for the future of the company. There are tons of ways they could make money by adding new services and features.... and advertising-related crap will never be among them.

  197. Mark CUban put this in his blog by Funkly · · Score: 1

    MarK Cuban put this in his blog about a month ago, he invited someone to make a million off it, because he didn't have time...

    1. Re:Mark CUban put this in his blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep you are right about that. I remembered seeing it too and looked it up. It was idea #1. Crazy!

      Mark's blog entry

      -Chris

  198. it's still worth it by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    tivo is an amazing device. if they need to add advertising, and doing so does not inherently change how i use the device, that's okay with me. i'd rather see tivo with some minor non-invasive advertising than no tivo, or tivo like devices.

    regardless, if they insert banner adds when i am ff'ing, who cares? i am still in control. i choose how long i need to ff. it's much different than a commercial where you are stuck there doing nothing until your scheduled programming returns.

  199. Re: Get in touch with reality please! by DickBreath · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Contrary to what the post implies, people don't buy a Tivo to "avoid advertising"

    I hate to break it to you, but some people do buy a Tivo for this express purpose. If you don't believe it, then you are out of touch.


    Finally, I want to know, why is there such an overwhelming anti-Tivo sentiment on Slashdot?

    Maybe it is because we bought our tivo's to avoid ads, which you don't seem to realize, and what is Tivo repeatedly trying to do? Put ads in front of us. Take away or limit features that help us to avoid ads.

    Of course, being out of touch with the first point, would explain your puzzlement on the second point.


    "TiVo viewers will see "billboards," or small logos, popping up over TV commercials as they fast-forward through them, offering contest entries, giveaways or links to other ads." Not quite the overwhelming barrage of advertising that some of you seem to be implying.

    You may not see a problem with this, as you explained. And that is fine for you. But I don't want ads, or small logos, or offerings of contest entries, or giveaways or links to other crap crap crap. That's what I am trying to get away from.

    As I said, you probably don't understand the anti-Tivo sentiment because you do not share the loathing of the ads.


    This will likely be no more intrusive then the "Record this program" logo that shows up one ads for certain TV programs already. Not the end of the world, really.

    Spam will likely be no more intrusive than an e-mail logo that shows up as one more subject line in your inbox. Not the end of the world, really.

    (Of course, I may be making a false assumption. Maybe you think spam is not so bad?)


    Tivo makes a solid, VERY well designed product. They sell it cheap, but charge a reasonable monthly fee to use the service. They're even reasonably supportive of the hacking community. Yes, they hope to make a profit in the process. What's really wrong with that?

    Yes, yes, and also yes. Finally, nothing is wrong with that.

    If part of their effort to make profit is to put craptacular logos and giveaways and contests in front of my face, then they are undermining the very profit they seek. Isn't it obvious that people don't want this? (Maybe not, see my first response above.)

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  200. HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone of those who use this technology will roll over and take it like whining little boys who don't get their way.

    Get used to our coporate overlords, cuz it's only going to get worse, unless folks actually start writing letters to your elected offficials in order to stop this madness.

  201. This plain will not work. by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    I can only vouch for myself and my wife, but when we fast forward *anything* in TiVo we are watching the whatever is being fast forwarded to know where to resume play.

    Any banner ad will be 100% ignored simply due to this fact. I may not be watching the commericals, but I am watching them in fast forward to know where to resume play. I sure as heck won't be reading a banner ad.

  202. I couldn't agree more by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

    The more news I read about Tivos, the more I love my Replay 5040. Never mind the fact that it costs less and has more features and comes with things that Tivo users have to buy seperately, but it skips commercials, doesn't ram ads down my throat and doesn't tell the mother company if I paused or rewound Ms. Jacksons teet.

  203. Fast forward must be too slow in Tivo by poopie · · Score: 1

    "TiVo viewers will see "billboards," or small logos, popping up over TV commercials as they fast-forward through them, offering contest entries, giveaways or links to other ads."

    Do you know how long it takes MythTV to fastforward over a commercial? It's like milliseconds - okay maybe 1 or 2 seconds if you have to do it manually 30 seconds at a time. If Tivo's fastforward is so slow that they have time to show you additional commercials, then I feel sorry for you.

    1. Re:Fast forward must be too slow in Tivo by ibbey · · Score: 1

      Tivo's fastest fast forward is >60:1. I just tested it & it took about 27 seconds to FF through a 30 minute program.

      But keep in mind that I'm not arguing against MythTV. MythTV is cool, and I may eventually build another Myth box (To prove that I'm not anti-MythTV, see this post from nearly two years ago. Unfortunately, the software was too immature at the time & my budget ran out so I never got mine working well enough to be usable).

      But arguing that MythTV is better then Tivo is silly. In some ways, yes it is better, though I question the common argument that cost is one of the advantages. With Tivo's costing $99 now, I seriously doubt you could get a Myth box with decent performance & picture quality for much less then you can get a Tivo & a years worth of service. And once you factor in your time and effort, it's probably not going to be worth it. On the other hand, many people will enjoy the process, and as you point out, MythTv has several features that Tivo lacks. So, pick your platform that's right for you. But don't assume that just because it's right for you that it's right for everybody.

      And don't rant about the evils of Tivo, because they are not evil. Rant about Microsoft all you want, I'm right there with you. But MS has earned the loathing that I feel for them Tivo has earned nothing but respect from me. Do I like every decision that they've ever made? Of course not. But since I don't want them to go out of business, I'm willing to let a few minor things (such as this) slide.

  204. Today's TV programming is CHEAP! by poopie · · Score: 1

    How about letting the market decide that? If the payback from advertising drops to the point where it can no longer support creation and delivery of programming, what then? Will the demand for programming go away?

    SO, you mean to tell me that reality TV shows are so expensive to create?

    You mean to tell me that following a couple on a date and filming it costs a lot of money to create?

    You mean to tell me that cleaning someone's house and filming it on TV costs a lot of money?

    Advertising needs to deal with the new reality and their new econimic models. I, for one, will continue to use every tool and technology to optimize my leisure time viewing and listening for maximum content and minimum advertising.

  205. Easy Solution by BobSutan · · Score: 1

    I have already begun such a process. Instead of putting up with the shenanigans of the studios, I've ceased to watch add-based television.


    Then I download the shows I want to watch, 100% commerical free :)

    --
    "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
  206. Its like Max Headroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only could you not avoid ads, you could not turn off the TV either. I wonder how long it will be before we are forced to that model.

  207. HR2391 Does Not Ban Commercial Skipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Has anyone read HR2391? Oh wait, this is Slashdot, where no one follows the links and reads all the way through.

    Well, if you did, you'd see on page 26

    SEC. 212. EXEMPTION FROM INFRINGEMENT FOR SKIPPING AUDIO AND VIDEO CONTENT IN MOTION PICTURES.
    (a) SHORT TITLE.--This section may be cited as the
    ''Family Movie Act of 2004''.
    (b) EXEMPTION FROM COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK
    INFRINGEMENT FOR SKIPPING OF AUDIO OR VIDEO CON-
    TENT OF MOTION PICTURES.--Section 110 of title 17,
    United States Code, is amended--
    (1) in paragraph (9), by striking ''and'' after
    the semicolon at the end;
    (2) in paragraph (10), by striking the period at
    the end and inserting ''; and'';
    (3) by inserting after paragraph (10) the fol-
    lowing:
    ''(11) the making imperceptible, by or at the di-
    rection of a member of a private household, of lim-
    ited portions of audio or video content of a motion
    picture, during a performance in that household for
    private home viewing, from an authorized pre-re-
    corded copy of the motion picture, or the creation or provision of a computer program or
    other technology that enables such making imperceptible and that is
    designed and marketed for such use at the direction
    of a member of a private household, if no fixed copy of the altered version of the motion picture is created by such computer program or other technology.'';

    and (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ''For purposes of paragraph (11)--
    ''(A) the term 'making imperceptible' does not
    include the addition of audio or video content that
    is performed or displayed over or in place of existing
    content in a motion picture; and
    ''(B) the term 'pre-recorded copy' means a copy
    of a motion picture that--
    ''(i) is manufactured under the authority
    of the copyright owner; and
    ''(ii) has been made available for sale to
    the public.''.


    If you didn't read where I bolded and italicized the appropriate content, then let me break it out for you:

    "if no fixed copy of the altered version of the motion picture is created by such computer program or other technology."

    There's no room for misinterpretation here. Unless you are *CREATING* an altered copy by skipping commercials or other content (which Tivo DOES NOT) you are perfectly fine.

    RTFA!!!
  208. tivo needs adblock by KB1GHC · · Score: 1

    I guess i'll need to start running FireFox on my TiVo so i can use AdBlock?

    besides TiVo is an open-source thing, if they decide to add that feature i'll just change it.

    also, i don't used the fast forward button. you can use the >| button as a 30 second skip by pressing the following buttons:

    Select Play Select 3 0 Select

    and it will unlock the 30 second skip, it makes fast forwarding through commercials easyer (in my opinion)

    putting banner ads on my TV is really agrevating, thats why I dumped Comcast Digital Cable (3 seconds after install) and desided to get DirecTV (2 years later)

  209. Answer by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I have a simple answer to the question of what should replace advertising revenue: subscription revenue or pay-per-view.

    Except that obviously the cable companies would need to allow people to buy only the channels they want, because a full subscription to absolutely everything would balloon to hundreds of dollars.

    And obviously, the big media corporations are rabidly against having that happen, because they wouldn't then be able to force their crappy channels on people who don't want them, and they wouldn't be able to claim ludicrously inflated statistics about how many homes get their channel.

    I'd benefit, because I'd buy the half dozen channels I actually watch, and not get stuck with paying for ESPN, CNN, ABC, NBC, Fox News and other dreck.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  210. Re:ReplayTV uses the pause screen for their OWN ad by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    in the past week or so they placed an ad on a pause screen for a special deal on additional units for existing ReplayTV customers.

    So who shot first, Han or Greedo? The ReplayTV unit, you say? Err... nevermind...

  211. Loss of ad revenue? Boo hoo! by n0w0rries · · Score: 1

    So you mean actors might actually only make 6 or 7 figures per year instead of per episode? Boo hoo! I will NEVER feel sorry for hollywood not making enough money.

    There will be no tear in my beer for them.

    It's like that South Park episode about the RIAA. "Look, here's Britney Spears. Why is she so sad you ask? Well, she had her eyes set on a Gulfstream IV, but because people are downloading her music off the internet for free, she can only afford a Gulstream III now."

  212. But who pays for the commercials? by PjotrP · · Score: 1
    Where does the money come from that companies use to buy advertisement time on television? yup, we pay for that by buying their products.


    In some twisted way, we, the people, pay to be bothered by stupid irritating commercials. Without advertisement products could be cheaper. For example, just look at how much money goes to marketing when you buy a cd.


    At least we should be allowed to not watch the commercials we paid for ourselves...

    --
    PjotrP
  213. I can't believe there's no discussion about Replay by Trixter · · Score: 1

    For almost half a decade, ReplayTV units have had 30-second skip, automatic commercial skip, and a TCP/IP port so that you can suck shows off the unit and burn them to DVD (with DVArchive and others). I honestly cannot understand why people keep buying TiVo when ReplayTV is and always has been a much better option.

  214. This is why I've never bought a TIVO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would rather bulid a PVR where I could control everything myself instead of being lazy and relying on Tivo to take care of my lazy ass. How hard is it to program something to record? It reminds me of the dopey people that always bitched about VCRs being soooo complicated and the clock is always flashing 12:00am....

    Yes, that's a lot of people.

    Also, all of that data about yourself you're passing along to Tivo and who-knows-who. That's no good.

  215. Umm, it's still a PVR right? by Omega · · Score: 1
    Actually if you cancel the TiVo service, you still have a PVR, don't you? I mean, you can still record programs by entering the dates & times; you can still pause & rewind live TV -- right?


    It's not quite a paperweight. The TiVo works without the subscription, it's just not as fun. Your $300 in equipment will still be there, but your service will disapper when your monthly service charge disappears.

  216. What I want by wrook · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, executives are crazy. Why force people to watch something when you already *know* they will watch it if you give them access to it voluntarily?

    For example, commercials... Anyone ever heard of the endless commercial channel known as "The Shopping Channel"? Crap, I'm paying to get this thing in my cable setup. There are people who have this abomination hard wired into their TV so that they don't have to be subjected to any actual content in their viewing pleasure.

    Here's what I want from a PVR: When the commercials are coming up, instead of skipping them, give me a menu of all the commercials and allow me to choose to watch one if I want. Also give me a an option *not* to watch any. Give me the option to ban specific ads (for content inappropriate to my family) on my PVR too. Finally, give me a list of all the ads associated with a show and allow me to save the ads separately (in case it's a particularly good one and I want to show my friends).

    Let's face it. Some people don't want to see any ads. Showing them ads will just piss them off and make them *less* likely to buy your product. The *vast majority* of people actually want to see some ads and would choose to watch them at least once or twice if given the option.

    I don't see the point in forcing people to view an ad for a product that they don't want. In some cases (McCain's!!!!!) the ads themselves are so bad that some people (I won't mention any names) boycott the product just because of the ad.

  217. Why /. crowd talks as if TIVO was the only PVR? by managerialslime · · Score: 1
    I was one of the first TIVO subscribers when Comcast rolled out a rental program years ago.

    In 2003, I terminated it when the family budget got tight. TV viewing became a miserable, boring, and frustrating experience. I was so ready to sign up again at what ever the price.

    In 2004, I signed up for the DISH network with a 100-hour PVR (Personal Video Recorder) (PVR-522) that added $10 a month to my 2-set bill.

    When I got on the phone, they charged me two months programming up front, then waived the next two months of bills. The net: no real up front charge and the commitment is only month-to-month.

    The dish PVR does most of what TIVO does. There are two things it does not do. First, it does not go out and record shows you have not requested but where the database shows you are LIKELY to enjoy. Second, when you like a show, you have to manually pick each of the channels you want to record from. (I.e. the West Wing is on two networks and you have to pick both.) Neither of these deficiencies were deal killers for me.

    The PVR came with 1 box and one remote for each of my 2 TVs. You can record up to 2 shows at one and either TV can play anything recorded on the PVR. Once again I am watching 1-hour shows in 42 commercial-free minutes.

    I now pay less for programming than I did with Comcast and less for the PVR than I did with TIVO.

    (I must so sound like a shill for DishNetwork. I have no connection with them and none of their stock.)

    Not only does the PVR have a fast-forward button like on TIVO, but there is also a 30-second forward button. Press 6 times during a prime-time commercial (or 8 times during the West Wing) and you have zapped past the commercials faster than TIVO's fast-forward.)

    Based on all of this, I think a little less TIVO-centric ranting is in order. Ticked off at TIVO? Consider the competition.

    --
    Live Long and Prosper - Thanks Leonard. You are missed.
  218. Re: Get in touch with reality please! by ibbey · · Score: 1

    I hate to break it to you, but some people do buy a Tivo for this express purpose. If you don't believe it, then you are out of touch.

    So let me get this straight. The only reason you bought a Tivo was to avoid commercials? So you would be equally happy with a box that didn't let you pause, rewind, schedule, etc. as long as it blanked the screen & muted the volume while the commercials were on? I didn't think so. You bought a Tivo because you wanted to have more control over the TV. This doesn't change anything about that. All it does is show an icon on the screen during the commercials. It won't even be on every commercial, since advertisers will have to pay Tivo for the privilege. Big Fucking Deal. You will still be able to fast forward past the commercials just as quickly as you could before, and with the hack someone mentioned earlier, you will still be able to skip 30 seconds at a time & not even see the commercials.

    As I said, you probably don't understand the anti-Tivo sentiment because you do not share the loathing of the ads.

    Maybe you're right. I only have a normal hatred of advertising. You seem to have a borderline psychosis on the issue. Of course, down the road when the only channels that are available are pay channels, you'll probably be longing for the ads.

    Spam will likely be no more intrusive than an e-mail logo that shows up as one more subject line in your inbox. Not the end of the world, really.

    This is about the stupidest argument you could have possibly made. This is no more intrusive then the commercials that you are already FFin past. The ONLY difference is a small logo on the screen. Once again, BIG FUCKING DEAL! If they ever start (for example) requiring me to watch an ad before I can watch a recorded program, I'll be screaming as loud as you are. But the current plan is no where near enough to make me upset. There are REAL things in the world to worry about, why get your panties in a bunch over this silly issue?

    If part of their effort to make profit is to put craptacular logos and giveaways and contests in front of my face, then they are undermining the very profit they seek. Isn't it obvious that people don't want this? (Maybe not, see my first response above.)

    But you don't need to click on the link to view the contest or whatever. YOU ARE NOT BEING FORCED TO DO ANYTHING. If you don't want to watch the ad, continue to fast forward past it like you do now. Like I said, if you don't like the new "feature", switch to MytyhTV. I have absolutely nothing against it. But your irrational hatred of Tivo is silly. Tivo isn't evil. Can you imagine you grandma setting up & using MythTV? A friend's grandma just bought a Tivo, set it up herself & is very happy with it. She's not technically illiterate, but there's no way in hell she could have set up Myth. So if you hate this feature so much, please switch. But keep in mind that it's not THAT big of a deal.

  219. Get a Life by Anamanaman · · Score: 1

    So what? Ads are showing where its not obtrusive. I'd much rather they made money this way then charge me more per month.

    I think Tivo isnt being run right. They shouldnt have to charge people monthly for their service. In fact, they should give out the boxes for next to nothing. Can you imagine how valuable the data that they collect could be? Who is watching what, who is recording what, plus direct access to consumers. Tivo popup ads, and buying guides could get them tons of revenue.

    Maybe the reason why they dont do this is the stereotypical slashdot user would shit a brick if they found out some company was "stealing" their tv usage data anonymously. You guys are way to freakin sensitive.

  220. So now I'm paying for ads twice over by curtlewis · · Score: 1

    I pay the cable company and I get ads, I pay tivo a service fee and they're going to force me to see ads?

    I hope this only affects fast forward and not the skip button.

    If the tivo service was really cheap I wouldn't mind so much, but it's fairly pricey. They're trying so hard not to piss off the big media that they're going to alienate their customers and therefore confront head on their biggest fear - loss of their business.

  221. TiVo is in trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're trying to sell you a box AND make you pay a monthly subscription fee, while cable companies will rent you a box for about the same price as the subscription fee.

  222. no tivo by torrents · · Score: 1

    replacing commercials with banner ads, so instead of watching ads you're essentially paying to watch ads... good move tivo... probably time to short the stock

    --
    Get your torrents...
  223. But how do you use it?? by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    I've never understood this one. How do you know how many times to press this button? Are there always a certain number of 30 second commercials?

    1. Re:But how do you use it?? by EricHsu · · Score: 1
      I hit it, and it skips to the next commercial. It takes me about .5 sec to realize it's another commercial. I hit it again, skip to next commercial. Repeat until I get to the show part.

      It's sort of manual, but it's also nice to feel like you are eradicating each individual commercial.

  224. Re:Enable the 30 second skip and don't worry about by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    Does this only work with certain TiVo versions? I have TiVo Series 2 (?) and I've never been able to get this hidden feature to work. I hear the bing-bing-bing, but the skip button still jumps to the show's end or 15 minutes. :\

  225. Re:Enable the 30 second skip and don't worry about by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
    Chances of this backdoor still existing in the software update that enables these ads: somewhere in the vicinity of zero.

    The best way round it seems to be to get a UK TiVo - we just don't get any software updates :(

    --
    Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  226. Product identification vs. advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, no, that is not quite the same thing. You are actually using all the products you mentioned. You don't get any forced advertisements for products you haven't chosen, or have no desire to choose, or even find to be repulsive and intrusive to begin with.

    I sure wouldn't want to see McDonalds, Exxon or even Windows logo every once in a while, because I find those companies somewhat repulsive. And just as well someone else might not want to be forced to look at a RedHat ad, since they want to have nothing to do with that.

    It's my environment, and I want to choose which products appear in it.

  227. Re:I can't believe there's no discussion about Rep by sabat · · Score: 1

    Well, isn't Replay out of business?

    --
    I, for one, welcome our new Antichrist overlord.
  228. You Know What Would Be Fucking Cool? by sabat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Here's a project that would really be good -- it's too bad I'm lame with hardware or I'd start it.

    What if you got MythTV working well on an X Box? Then you'd have a Tivo replacement that's about the same price as a Tivo, but (obviously) with all the advantages of open source.

    Linux already boots on XBox, so isn't it possible to make MythTV work? Am I the first to think of this?

    --
    I, for one, welcome our new Antichrist overlord.
  229. Re: Get in touch with reality please! by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    I only have a normal hatred of advertising. You seem to have a borderline psychosis on the issue. Of course, down the road when the only channels that are available are pay channels, you'll probably be longing for the ads.

    TiVo's ads do nothing towards funding the programming whose ads I am skipping.

    I have a problem with advertising because it is everywhere. It is impossible to avoid. I want to be left alone in peace. I'm sorry that you think that a desire to avoid ads is a psychosis.

    If ads were like they once were, there wouldn't be the current anti-ad sentiment. Advertising has gotten way out of control. That fact is not a psychosis. If ads hadn't gotten way out of control, I wouldn't have a problem.


    If they ever start (for example) requiring me to watch an ad before I can watch a recorded program, I'll be screaming as loud as you are. But the current plan is no where near enough to make me upset. There are REAL things in the world to worry about,

    DVD's already do this.

    I'm not really so upset as you seem to think. I just think Tivo is making a very stupid mistake. Their ads don't fund the progrmaming. The money goes to Tivo. So there is no argument about Tivo's ads supporting the program.

    People who bought a Tivo, where one of its significant benefits is to skip ads, have a genuine right to be FUCKING UPSET that tivo is taking this away. Why do you think owners should be happy about this and just accept it? After all, there are bigger problems in the world. Just accept whatever changes Tivo wants to make. Be quite. Don't complain. I suppose this should extend to Microsoft as well.

    I do worry plenty about other real things in the world. But I have a right to be upset at Tivo.


    If you don't want to watch the ad, continue to fast forward past it like you do now. Like I said, if you don't like the new "feature", switch to MytyhTV.

    There is slipery slope principle here.

    There is a similar argument, if you don't like spam, just click delete. After all, once upon a time, it was just an occaisional spam. You seem to miss the slipery slope connection.

    How long until my Tivo is plasterd with ads, logos, giveaways, contests, and other crap? It's just one more intrusion. Just ignore it.

    BTW, using MythTV or Freevo is a possibility I look at from time to time. I would love to see a Knoppix-like eash-to-install special purpose distribution that is turnkey. Just boot the CD, format drive, install, and reboot.


    So let me get this straight. The only reason you bought a Tivo was to avoid commercials?

    No. It was a major reason.

    Imagine that a different history had taken place. Suppose someone developed a box that ONLY skipped commercials, are you suggesting that there would be no market for that?

    People would buy boxes with various functionality and various prices. Tivo happens to have found a combination and price that the market will bear.


    So you would be equally happy with a box that didn't let you pause, rewind, schedule, etc. as long as it blanked the screen & muted the volume while the commercials were on? I didn't think so.

    You're right, of course. I wouldn't be EQUALLY happy. But you seem to miss the point that avoiding commercials is a significant part of the picture.


    Big Fucking Deal. You will still be able to fast forward past the commercials just as quickly as you could before

    Hey, if you're happy with that, then I'm glad for you.

    I continue to assert that it is my right to be upset about it. And it is not unreasonable either.

    If you believe that I should be happy to accept what ever creeping changes Tivo wants to make from what they sold, then the psychosis is yours.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  230. Re:I can't believe there's no discussion about Rep by Trixter · · Score: 1

    No, they are not out of business! Sheesh. You can buy units for $100 and the monthly fee is $12.95 a month (worth it for the great program guide and searching).

  231. RE: MythTV and relaibility by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm glad you are having better results than me with your Myth box. But I think my points still stand. If you browse the forums at www.mysettopbox.tv - you'll see plenty of complaints with stability problems, and hardly anything in the way of real solutions.

    Most people seem to either be running older revisions (and missing out on some of the newer features), or anxiously awaiting the R5 release (which seems to still be a ways off).

    I don't own a Tivo so I may be incorrect, but I thought Tivo owners had to pay for a subscription for the unit, and that gave them a different (and supposedly better) source of guide info than the free data offered at zap2it.com?

    In any case, I don't know anyone who honestly found the MythTV solution to be "quick and easy" to set up and get working. Heck, I must have spent at least 2 or 3 days fighting with mine just to get it to center its display on my big-screen TV set properly, without "overscanning" too far and cutting things off on the edges, or starting to show an edge of an X window on one edge. Lots of people have to use custom X mode lines just to get things to synch up properly with given TVs, and if you own an ATI video card - good luck there too. It's a neat project, but FAR from "plug and play" like a Replay TV or Tivo would be.

  232. Re: Get in touch with reality please! by ibbey · · Score: 1

    DVD's already do this.

    Few DVD's have ads other then trailers (at least that I have seen), and most trailers can be skipped. When they can't, I agree you have reason to be upset. They also do this in some theaters, and I don't go to those theatres. The last movie that I saw in a Cineplex Odeon theater had 21 minutes of advertising before the movie (about 50/50 ads & trailers for bad movies). I don't go to that theater anymore. Instead, I'm a loyal fan of Landmark Theatres, who have NO advertising before films other then trailers (at least here in Seattle), and the trailers are mostly for movies that I have at least some interest in seeing. Advertising isn't so bad when it's for something that you have an interest in.

    I have a problem with advertising because it is everywhere. It is impossible to avoid. I want to be left alone in peace.

    Then you should love this advertising. You're right, advertising is ubiquitous. But these ads are basically non-intrusive, unless you actually want to get more information about the product. Since it's completely voluntary to view the offer, it seems unreasonable to be overly upset.

    People who bought a Tivo, where one of its significant benefits is to skip ads, have a genuine right to be FUCKING UPSET that tivo is taking this away. Why do you think owners should be happy about this and just accept it? After all, there are bigger problems in the world. Just accept whatever changes Tivo wants to make. Be quite. Don't complain.

    But you can still skip the ads! You will get through the ad exactly as fast as before. The only difference will be an icon on the screen. If they make the process intrusive, I'll be upset. And I'm not saying you shouldn't complain. Just understand the issue before you complain.

    I suppose this should extend to Microsoft as well.

    No, as I'm suggesting you do with Tivo, I judge MS on their history. MS has an extensive history of bad behavior. I've made this point quite clear in every one of my posts on the matter. Tivo has NO history of such behavior. We really don't even know what the plan is. This entire uproar is over one article, with only one brief quote from a Tivo employee. So until we know more, I think skepticism is warranted, but not outrage. Sending Tivo a polite email telling them your concerns with program is appropriate at the present time, but publicly ranting about how "TiVo is dead to me" (not a quote from you, but from another poster) seems a bit premature.

    There is a similar argument, if you don't like spam, just click delete. After all, once upon a time, it was just an occaisional spam. You seem to miss the slipery slope connection.

    Comparing this to spam is completely invalid. A reasonable comparison would be to website banner ads. And, probably unlike you, I don't mind banner ads, as long as they are not overly intrusive. After all, many of the websites we visit every day wouldn't be here if they did not have advertising support (Slashdot for example). If the ads are very annoying, with sound & flashing colors & such, then I will be more upset. But I have no reason to believe that that is the case. They currently offer this exact service to Networks ("Press thumbs up to record this program") and it's not overly intrusive. Since they have a history of doing this sort of thing right, it seems a tad paranoid to assume that they will do it wrong this time.

    I'm not really so upset as you seem to think. I just think Tivo is making a very stupid mistake. Their ads don't fund the progrmaming. The money goes to Tivo. So there is no argument about Tivo's ads supporting the program.

    Granted (and you're correct that I was mistaken in pointing this out). But people are always screaming that Tivo is going to be out of business any day now, so any additional revenue is a good thing. And since they are saying that "the advertising revenue will probably bring down the [subsc