Slashdot Mirror


Attack of the Clones

ramakant writes: "It looks like George Lucas has really sold out this time. If you thought Jar-Jar Binks was bad, MTV.com is running a story that a few members of 'NSYNC will be making cameos in Episode II. I think the target demographic for these films has changed a little since the original trilogy. Oh well, at least LOTR rocked." The MTV article says that NSYNC asked for the part; an article in a UK tabloid says Lucas asked them.

691 comments

  1. Big deal. by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who can tell one extra from another?

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:Big deal. by WeaselGod · · Score: 4, Informative

      who can tell one boy band from another

      --
      - WeaselGod
      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet turbines
    2. Re:Big deal. by Shiblon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who can tell one extra from another?

      Now, that gives a whole new meaning to the title of the movie!

    3. Re:Big deal. by I+Love+this+Company! · · Score: 1

      Like, gawd! Justin is 'NSync (he is, like, sooooo hot!), and A.J. is in the Back--

      Oh, perhaps I've said too much. Death to them all.

      --

      "All art is quite useless." -- Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:Big deal. by rm-r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The big deal is that these guys, who are never going to have to work another day in there lives are taking parts that would otherwise have gone to struggling actors who really need the money. Don't you think it's funny seeing big name actors in tiny bitparts in their early days?

      --

      J-aims
      --
      Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
    5. Re:Big deal. by Dragonmaster+Lou · · Score: 1

      Naaa, let O-Town stay around. Ashley Angel get spared the death penalty for having been a voice actor in the Lunar RPGs before joining a boy band. :P

      Sorry, inside joke among Lunar fans...

    6. Re:Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called CHEESE, and it just doesn't fly. It was bad enough having E.T. in Episode 1. Note to George - It's called 'suspension of disbelief' for a reason, and it doesn't work when you implement the worst possible crap from our world into yours. I wonder if Monica Lewinsky and John Tesh will be seen as Jedi Masters?

      ...may his beard be infested with the fleas of a 1000 camels! Short scene or no, kills them off or no, shit like N'Sync has NO place in a Star Wars movie. I'm officially worried this is but another revealing symptom of a mass delusional mental illness, first manifesting itself in the form of Jar Jar Binks, now this...him having his kids help write the movie, create characters and name people (Dexter Jettster? Sheesh!) is going to ruin his reputation and visit grief upon millions of avid Star Wars fans...N'Sync...unbelievable...

      "Worst episode ever!"
      - Comic Book Guy

  2. Sounds bad by ttyRazor · · Score: 5, Informative

    At least they all get slaughtered within half a second. http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,4-2001601540,00 .html

    1. Re:Sounds bad by mbourgon · · Score: 4, Funny
      "They are only seen for half a second in the background getting blown up by droids. There is then a short, blurry shot of N Sync dying."
      Apparently this is a REAL minor cameo, and a real minor deal. Hey, why are we bitching? We'll get to see 'NSane die!
      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    2. Re:Sounds bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, why are we bitching? We'll get to see 'NSane die!

      Because it's only special effects?

    3. Re:Sounds bad by mrquicknet · · Score: 4, Redundant

      That's what I think also. I wish that all of the other boy bands were viciously killed seconds after they were on screen. I would love to see a whole battle where it nothing but shitty ass boy bands being mutilated and destroyed.

      --
      --------- Steve Martin once said, "Sex is the most natural, most beautiful, most wonderful thing that money can buy."
    4. Re:Sounds bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this informative? all he did was quote from the article.

    5. Re:Sounds bad by jwhyche · · Score: 0

      At first I was going to skip seeing Star Wars II in the theater because the last one was so bad. I had planed to wait till it came to DVD and rent it but this makes all the difference. Just to see Nsuck get waisted.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    6. Re:Sounds bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >At least they all get slaughtered within half a second.

      That's not "At least"; It's very, very good. I can imagine it now, when I go see the movie with friends:

      'N sync guy: oh, no, help us!

      (The band gets crushed, trampled, shot, blown-up, dematerialized, disemboweled, etc.)

      13-year-olds in theater: OHHH NOOO!!!!!

      Me: Yes! Yes! Bwahahhaaaahaaaaa! HOW'S THAT FOR A BROKEN HEART, EH?

      Friend: At least the empire has taste.

    7. Re:Sounds bad by daitengu · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's what I think also. I wish that all of the other boy bands were viciously killed seconds after they were on screen. I would love to see a whole battle where it nothing but shitty ass boy bands being mutilated and destroyed.

      Isn't that what MTV's Celebrity DeathMatch is all about?

    8. Re:Sounds bad by detritus. · · Score: 2

      I remember that supposedly Lucas himself made an extra appearance in Star Wars Episode 1 in a battle scene. I don't know if it was confirmed or not, but I think there's alot more secrets yet to be revealed in the already-released star wars movies.

    9. Re:Sounds bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On another note, does anyone else really hate these boy bands and "groups" that suck ass? I'm talking about the groups where the majority of their act is dancing around like a bunch of fucking jungle bunnies around a bonfire and twitching like they have some kind of parasite infecting their nervous system. I saw this ad on TV for this black guy doing all these different dance moves saying he taught all these groups their coreography and holy shit. Maybe he's right. They all do look alike. Everyone from Nsync to Britney Spears basically does the same god damn moves. Thank god for alternative rock bands where people are more interested in the music and SINGING and PLAYING their instruments than dancing around like fucking Kansas City faggots. Long live Alien Ant Farm and Blink182 baby.

    10. Re:Sounds bad by Floyd+Turbo · · Score: 1

      In that case it might not be too bad -- but I still demand to see a long, non-blurry shot of Jar-Jar Binks dying.

    11. Re:Sounds bad by Omicron · · Score: 1

      Have you ever watched Celebrity Deathmatch on MTV? The claymation fights to the death between celebrities?

      They had this one between N'Sync and the Backstreet Boys. All I could think was, somethings got to happen here, because neither of these groups can live knowing the writiers of the show. Well, Marilyn Manson showed up above the fighting ring and sawed down the scaffolding and dropped it on both of the bands and killed them all....twisted, but absolutely hilarious.

    12. Re:Sounds bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only can get worse. We're doomed.

    13. Re:Sounds bad by roman_mir · · Score: 2

      If Brandon Lee could be killed during a movie shot (killed by a bullet from a gun that was supposed to be only charged with blanks) then why can't the history repeat itself with 'NSync? Quickly, we need to get some working blasters somewhere, or maybe a working droid and just make it look like an accident!

    14. Re:Sounds bad by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Brandon Lee was killed by a shell casing fragment stuck in the gun, not an actual bullet. Whne the blank went off, the fragment came out of the barrel spinning and tore through the grocery bag and into his stomach. And even though they played through the rest of the scene without knowing he was dying, doctors still aren't sure if he would have survived if he had had immediate medical attention. As much as I dislike the boy bands, it's sad that you feel the need to draw parallels like this, even in jest.

    15. Re:Sounds bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you were making a kind of dumb sense until you uttered that last sentence...

    16. Re:Sounds bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alien Ant Farm and Blink 182 are just as much as sellouts as those other losers. Long live the Dropkick Murphys!

    17. Re:Sounds bad by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      I remember that supposedly Lucas himself made an extra appearance in Star Wars Episode 1 in a battle scene. I don't know if it was confirmed or not, but I think there's alot more secrets yet to be revealed in the already-released star wars movies.


      Such as: Jar-jar _is_ George Lucas, which explains why he was in EP1, and accounts for his "secret" appearance therein.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    18. Re:Sounds bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gortician kills boy bands dead.

      http://www.mp3.com/gortician

    19. Re:Sounds bad by Delphis · · Score: 1

      Sod clay, I want the REAL ones to die.

      --
      Delphis
    20. Re:Sounds bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one think that the appearance of NSYNC in the new Star Wars movie to
      be a stroke of genius by my idol George Lucas. Just look at the exquisite
      brilliance of the Phantom Menace. I believe that the Phantom Menace to be
      the best of all the Star Wars films. Empire Strikes Back is believed by a
      certain radical minority of SW fans to be the best of the series. I think
      that ESB is extremely overrated and simplistic frankly. TPM has a much more
      intriguing plot with a complex inter-galactic trade dispute which leads to a
      silent coup by the Machiavellian Senator Palpatine. I believe that the
      majority of the public prefers the latter than the former.

      I believe that hatred of NSYNC stems from the fact that a certain segment of
      the male SW fan base has always had hatred for womyn and their fabulous
      taste in music. What is wrong with George Lucas trying to broaden the
      fanbase of Star Wars by trying to directly appeal to this important
      demographic? These so-called fans are despicable for they admire the
      mysoginistic and bigoted Han Solo. Han Solo represents the typical
      unsophisticated cowboy American. He has no place in Star Wars as far as I'm
      concerned. I was glad when SWSE came out that Lucas re-edited the vile
      Greedo scene where Han shoots first. Now Han is not as despicable, but I
      still don't approve of him and I think that the vast majority of SW fans
      would agree with me.

      A far better character than Han Solo is Jar Jar Binks. Jar Jar Binks is a
      character that represents diversity and tolerance. He is a far more
      inclusive character than Han Solo. Jar Jar Binks is far more appealing to a
      wider audience than Han Solo ever could. I hear that an edited version of
      TPM was put out on the Internet called "The Phantom Edit 1.1" just to appeal
      to the evil fantasies of Jar Jar Binks haters. I hope that they find this
      disgusting person who made this abomination and imprison him for a long
      time. I normally do not approve of incarceration of criminals as I believe
      that criminals are victims of society but this person does not deserve such
      sympathy. Jar Jar Binks are a radical minority and are far outnumbered by
      people who think that he is just fabulous!

      I hope that N-SYNC will receive ample amounts of screen time in "Attack of
      the Clones" (most people would agree that is the best title for a SW movie)
      and it would be fantastic if Jar Jar Binks were to show off his exquisite
      dancing skills while these fine boys sing us true SW fans one of their hits
      in the movie.

    21. Re:Sounds bad by ncstockguy · · Score: 1

      Now, here's a REAL band. They haven't learned any kicky dance steps yet, but they sure know their music:
      http://timefly.net/
      They should cast these guys as the bar band in one of the ad-infinitum Star Wars flicks..

  3. Who would once rather see wasted by Jango Fett? by Spicy+Bisquit · · Score: 2, Troll

    Who would you rather see die by the hands of Jango Fett or the Sith....Jar Jar, or any member of N'Sync?

    1. Re:Who would once rather see wasted by Jango Fett? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    2. Re:Who would once rather see wasted by Jango Fett? by Legion303 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Who would you rather see die by the hands of Jango Fett or the Sith....Jar Jar, or any member of N'Sync?

      George Lucas.

      -Legion

  4. note to self........ by SonCorn · · Score: 4, Funny

    turn into a 13 year old girl who actually likes n'sync prior to seeing Star Wars Episode 2

    --
    What good is a used up world, and how could it be worth having? --Sting
    1. Re:note to self........ by mofolotopo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Any excuse is a good one.

    2. Re:note to self........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm impressed! Now many posts get a three!

    3. Re:note to self........ by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Aw, come ON. Like we need more of THOSE.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    4. Re:note to self........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could do with more of those...

    5. Re:note to self........ by skyhawker · · Score: 1

      We may all agree that this is funny, but it's those same 13 year old girls who turned Titanic into the all-time 800 pound gorilla of movies -- to the tune of nearly 2 gigabucks world-wide box office. Maybe George sold out, but he just may have sold out for really big bucks.

      --

      The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank.
      -- Scotty.
    6. Re:note to self........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      turn into a 13 year old girl

      Or just dress like one for fun... ;-)

    7. Re:note to self........ by khepher · · Score: 1

      DOn't forget the HOT GRITS!!!

  5. They get blasted though :) by niola · · Score: 1

    As terrible as it may sound that they are in the movie, at least they get blown up.

    The Post says they appear in the background of the film's climactic battle scene, before getting blown up by "battle droids."

    THis at least makes up somewhat for George selling out for a few more bucks to pad his already large wallet... --Jon

    1. Re:They get blasted though :) by daniel_isaacs · · Score: 2, Funny
      It reminds me of Pearl Harbor (the movie) where the movie sucks chick-movie ass for about an hour until they kill off Ben Inflict. Of course, he's not really dead, and comes back later to ruin the whole experience for you (provided you have a penis).

      The only upside to anything positive happening to N'Sync is that the Backstreet Boys have to be really pissed off that N'Sync is getting props instead of them.

      --
      - Dan I.
    2. Re:They get blasted though :) by AndroidCat · · Score: 2
      N'Sync is getting props instead of them.

      Giving them a prop would be good. Spinning. Very fast.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:They get blasted though :) by BitchAss · · Score: 2

      It gets better. They also only appear for a split second on the DVD release.

      --
      Like sex? Read and write about it! Indecent Blogging
  6. has the targeted demographic really changed? by steeef · · Score: 5, Insightful

    after all, those of us who grew up loving star wars saw them originally as children.

    1. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by JimE+Griff · · Score: 1

      I know I did. I wanted a light sabre for my fifth birthday.

      --
      Jimmy _______ | | | \__/
    2. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Legion303 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I *made* a light saber when I was 9 (well, OK, it wasn't a light saber, it was a fluourescent light tube, and I didn't make it so much as "got it from the garage"). It was better than my brother's light saber, which was a broom handle.

      It also did more damage in the form of shards of glass lacerating his nose. He got me back by spraying oven cleaner in my eyes. I'm still amazed we got through childhood without permanently maiming one another.

      -Legion

    3. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by PieceMaker · · Score: 1

      Some of us saw Star Wars originally as adults and have yet to grow up! :)

    4. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      The target age may not have changed, but the mentality sure has. If the Bay City Rollers had a cameo in the original Star Wars, my 12-year-old self would have been pretty turned off. Thank god Lucas had a little more sense back then.

      -- Brian

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    5. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but we were better when we were children! Just look at music then and music now. There's something wrong with kids these days...

    6. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      There's something wrong with kids these days...

      This may be a troll, but I'll bite...

      Don't you think that adults said the same thing when you were a kid? It is a never ending cycle. I could never understand why my parents didn't like popular music. I thought, "I will never be like that." Well, now that I'm in my thirties, I do like some popular music, but I surprise myself sometimes when I say things like, "Turn that noise down!"

    7. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by horster · · Score: 1

      just saw the original recently. funny, great action, great characters a perfect combination of banged up cheese with slick perfection.
      no, I think the quality has gone down quite a bit.

    8. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi dad,

      I can't wait for Fathers Day!

    9. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not at all, they're all kid's movies but some people refuse to accept that fact that something they loved as a child isn't so hot for adults. Its mostly nostalgia kicking in, though Empire was slightly darker and meaner.

    10. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they did, but even the adults liked Star Wars back then. Pretty much everyone over 16 agrees that Episode I sucked.

    11. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then her husband got the SMS instead

    12. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by DigitaLunatiC · · Score: 0

      Most of my family saw it when they were in there early 20s. While Star Wars is good for the kids, *N* isn't good for anyone.

    13. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Paradoxish · · Score: 1

      after all, those of us who grew up loving star wars saw them originally as children. That's true, but the target demographic was never teenage girls, which are the target audience for 'NSuck (immature? Maybe... oh, well). Star Wars just had a lot of appeal. And even though they're killed right away it seems like just another shift towards making Star Wars "kid friendly" (Jar Jar and that annoying overly-'kiddy' kid in EP1), something the original trilogy never was and never intended to be.

      --
      If you need to interpret my post, then you don't get it.
    14. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Chas · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I *made* a light saber when I was 9 (well, OK, it wasn't a light saber, it was a fluourescent light tube, and I didn't make it so much as "got it from the garage")."

      Bah! I made a REAL light saber!

      Of course I was a hopeless clod with it.

      But my life is now much more sedate since I chopped off an arm and both legs with it.

      At least I didn't bleed out. Instant light saber cauterization's good stuff!

      And if only I'd remembered to turn if off before I put it away.

      Ah well. Who wants to have the ability to sire kids anyhow?

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    15. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We did?

      I didn't see my first Star Wars until 1998. I didn't watch the whole trilogy until 1999.

      The last one sucked. It was worth renting but not the $9 I paid to watch it. I was bored half way through and couldn't wait for it to end. It was the last movie I've seen in a theater.

      I have been undecided about whether I would bother to watch another Star Wars movie. But this seals it. If NSYNC appears or is at all involved in the movie, I won't go see it. I won't rent it, I won't watch it on television. I won't even eat at restaurants that in any way tie in a promotion with the movie.

    16. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're amazingly old..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    17. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by squaretorus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. This is a fairy tale. Always has been always will be. It hapenned to be a pretty cool fairy tale with guns and stuff. But its still a fairy tale.

      The young female dollar is the hardest to tap into, and thus the one most ripe for new market share.

      The young female dollar worships celebrity. Get some celebrity in there and you might attract a 20% increase in the audience for Episode 2.

      This is exactly how Star Wars should be! You either grow with your audience, or you stick with the fairy tale. In these celebrity soaked times its the only way to win! You need something the chicks will want to watch 250 times over aswell.

    18. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by skotte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      did it ever occur to anyone that he just wanted to appeal to a broader audience? the previews so fFar look prett awesome; so maybe lucas just wanted to throw in a publicity bit which would attract the other half of a potential market: girls.

      there's a rant somewhere about TSR doing this to D&D. girls dont want to watch dumb movies about fFunny boys with goofy robes run around playing swords. girls want to see their fFavorite cute people appear, even fFor a minute, in a movie. so lucas attempts to cash in on this. i say no fFoul. he's got to employ a hundred extras anyway, right? so what if 4 of them happen to be in a band? as long as it doesnt disrupt the fFlow of the plot, i dont care. and since lucas tends to be very stringent about his plot designs, i cant imagine he would radically alter the way the fFilm moves just to invent screen time fFor some random persons.

    19. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by doorbot.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I wouldn't say that I "originally saw it as a child" because I was well past the "age of Star Wars" when I really got into it. I'd say it was in high school, so maybe I was 15 or so. Yes, I did know about Star Wars before that but I was more into things like GI Joe and Transformers.

      Now I'm almost 23 and I will happily sit down and watch Episodes 4 thru 6 in one sitting. They're fabulous movies and just because I've gotten older doesn't mean that I still have to be a child to appreciate them.

      The movies have been analyzed over and over by critic after critic, but the movies have a certain charm to them. They're like Aladdin; the target audience may be children (debatable) but I think that adults get more out of the movie than their kids. Episodes 4 thru 6 were more of an epic tale for the 20th century, and not just something trying to capture the interest of a 8 year old child.

      For whatever reason, Lucas has lost sight of the original vision of his filmmaking career... look at American Graffiti or Episodes 4 thru 6, and even the Indiana Jones trilogy (if you want to stretch things). Now compare to more recent works by Lucas, in comparison to the Lord Of The Rings trilogy. LOTR has quite a large budget, and has many well known actors, but still managed to save that "filmmaking innocence" that is sincerely lacking in Hollywood.

      Whether Lucas lost it or has simply abandoned it of his own will, I cannot say. But I can tell you that I will be buying the LOTR DVD but have yet to buy Episode 1 on DVD... despite being a self proclaimed "Star Wars nut." Now tell me who's the target market...

    20. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. I saw it as a child. Guess what, I grew up. All the loyal fans he has who saw 4-6 as kids are now adults who would love to enjoy 1-3 in the same way. That means an adult market. I'm not saying they have to be explicit, but can we drop all the bullshit. If he EVER gets to do 7-9 then you're going to end up with 9 movies, at say... 2 hrs per movie. That's 18 hours at least of video. Kids aren't known for large attention spans. Kids don't want to sit through that much to see the whole 'star wars experience'. Kids don't control money, and I don't think kids like the same crap we liked as kids. Were the books these are based on written for children? Don't get me wrong; if you want to drag your loud hyperactive kids to the theatre go for it. They won't be the only bored children at the theatre during the movie. Hell, he can even make it a fairytail if he wants, but he shouldn't make it offensively stupid.

    21. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Insightful


      ...those of us who grew up loving star wars saw them originally as children.


      This gets bandied about every time Star Wars is mentioned. Especially after George Lucas used it to dismiss his fans' critisims from EP1. Star Wars is a kids movie. Anybody who claims otherwise are blinded by nostalgia.


      I don't buy it.


      Sure. I'm a sucker for nostalgia. There's lots of things I enjoy simply because I had enjoyed them in the past. But I can tell when I'm simply being nostalgic.


      There are plenty of examples within movies (and television). I still enjoy the first 3 Star Wars movies. I was disappointed in the 4th (EP1). Even now, comparing all four on VHS I get the same reactions.


      Distorted views through nostalgia lenses? Hardly. I used to enjoy some B-grade scifi, Buck Rogers, and The A Team. Now when I see these same works, I also see the small bits of why I thought they were so cool. But its also glaringly obvious why my father would roll his eyes and leave the room.


      Good, if not great, works remain so even if they were origionally seized by a younger generation. And uninspired works remain... uninspired.


      Star Wars was a suprise hit in an area that The Industry had, rightfully, disreguarded. It did something different and suceeded. Alas, that something is now lost to Lucas. He's sunk in to mediocraty. And his defense is our childhood.

    22. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by ljoas · · Score: 1

      Now I'm almost 23 and I will happily sit down and watch Episodes 4 thru 6 in one sitting.


      23? You are still a kid, kid.... :-)

      /L
    23. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 4, Troll
      If the Bay City Rollers had a cameo in the original Star Wars, my 12-year-old self would have been pretty turned off. Thank god Lucas had a little more sense back then.

      Four words, buddy:

      1. Star
      2. Wars
      3. Christmas
      4. Special

      Perhaps not the Bay City Rollers, but you've got Jefferson Starship, as well as your Art Carney, Harvey Korman, Bea Arthur and Diahann Carroll.

      And really, what says "long time ago in a galaxy far far away" more than Bea Arthur? .

    24. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Hast · · Score: 1

      I've heard that one of the oldest (When I heard of it first it was the oldest.) ancient findings of writing which has been found, contains a passage about how "Kids these days don't respect their elders."

      Don't know if it's true, but I sure wouldn't be surprised.

    25. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      16 years old? i think you're being too nice.

      My 5 year old thought jar-jar was stupid.

    26. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its mostly nostalgia kicking in, though Empire was slightly darker and meaner.

      I'll admit Return of the Jedi was mostly aimed at kids, but the first two certainly were not.
      But Episode I was a total and complete sell out. The previous movies had nothing as childish as jar-jar.
      I thought I could look past this disgusting whore of a character, then I realized the movie was utter shit when I saw ET and his friends in Corussant.

    27. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by thing12 · · Score: 1

      Why was Jedi aimed at kids? Because of the Ewoks? There is lots of sex and violence in Jedi. In some ways more than the other movies. I don't see how it didn't deserve its PG rating. Sure, it wasn't ominous and dark like Empire was, but that was only partly because Empire's director died, mostly it was because it'd the end of a trilogy and it had a happy ending. One thing you didn't really get a feeling for was that the Ewoks were being oppressed by the Empire, that would have made the story more interesting at least.

    28. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up you crazy foo! The A-Team still rocks!

    29. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he's 23 and a half?

    30. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      Nostalgia has absolutely nothing to do with it. Regardless of whether or not the target has changed, the production values have. You do remember Star Wars, don't you? The movies that broke new ground in virtually evey area of special effects? These movies featured then-unknown actors who could actually act, and visual effects that were absolutely stunning for their time.

      Episode One features very poorly done CGI, and lots of big-name actors who aren't doing a very good job of acting. Fine, maybe there isn't as much new ground to break these days, but I would definitely have been happier with a hell of a lot less cheap CGI.

      It just doesn't seem like as much care and effort when into making Episode One. Maybe more money, but less care.

      yrs,
      EPhemeriis

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    31. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      you are kidding right?

      the new SWE1 was so frigen candy coated, I got a cavity watching it. if you compair E4-E6 to E1 and probably through E3, the sugar coating and cutesie look are all over the place.

      christ, Shrek was more adult than SWE1.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    32. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Cybersiren · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Girls don't want to watch action/sci-fi/fantasy movies?

      Some girls may not. While I will grant that there's a larger audience of boys for this kind of film, I'd suggest that there are also plenty of girls who enjoyed the original Star Wars films, and did not need to be pandered to in this ludicrous sort of way.

      I very much enjoyed the original three films when I was a young girl. I can't be the only one who did.

    33. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by MadAhab · · Score: 2
      You forgot to mention interpretive dance, the first three minutes consisting only of Wookies grunting, and Art Carney actually saying the words "Wookie Ookies", which means "Wookie cookies", only it's twice as stupid and less comprehensible.

      After seeing that special, I understood why Harrison Ford can't watch himself in Star Wars.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    34. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by pappy72 · · Score: 1

      yea, kind of hard to actually see the movies for the first time as a kid, when he was just born in 1979....

    35. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I was very disappointed with the acting.

      Did anyone else think Samuel Jackson (Mace Windu) seemed way too annoyed about Anakin Skywalker?
      I mean first he goes and says "You speak of the one who will bring balance to the force"
      Later when Liam Neason(Qui Gonn - and the only decently acted character) asks to bring Anakin to the council, Jackson rolls his eyes, and says "bring him before us then"

      WTF?
      Why would he be annoyed? Mad, scared, sad maybe. But annoyed?
      That was stupid. If you are going to have a role in the most anticipated movie of all time, at least do some research on the character's motivation.

      BTW, I think Samuel Jackson is an excellent actor in most cases, but he was either directed very badly for this flick, or he just didn't give a shit about it in which case the casting director was a complete moron.

    36. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Ionized · · Score: 1

      just another shift towards making Star Wars "kid friendly" (Jar Jar and that annoying overly-'kiddy' kid in EP1), something the original trilogy never was and never intended to be.

      right, because ewoks and wookies weren't intended to appeal to young children.....

      get over it. star wars has ALWAYS catered to younger audiences. the only thing thats changed is your perspective.

    37. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      These movies featured then-unknown actors who could actually act

      Um. Uh. Hahahaha. Ahem. *sigh*

    38. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I'm concerned, A New Hope did well enough with the Cantina Band instead of Supertramp...so why NStink?

    39. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      It's not that George Lucas is sunk in mediocrity. It's that he's so rich he doesn't have to listen/nobody will tell him any of his ideas are stupid.
      When he was a punk-ass director making American Graffiti, I'm *sure* that he had to sit down, think out his ideas, and that he bounced them off his friends (don't we all?).
      I'm equally sure some of them said "George, that's a stupid idea" to some of them. So he revised them.
      Now, when he owns IL&M, Skywalker Ranch, etc, he's so damn rich & powerful, either nobody has the nuts to say "George, making an alien sound like a 1920's Al-Jolson mockery of a negro is a STUPID IDEA" *or* someone said it, and he's got too much ego to listen. I don't know the guy, so I don't know which is true. But I do know if you ran the "jar-jar" idea past 3 sane adults, at least 2 would say its ridiculous.

      --
      -Styopa
    40. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars is pretty much in the same category with Buck Rogers and the A-Team. Bad news but listen carefully to the dialog and actually critique the acting and you'll be sorely disappointed. That said as it was the first decent quality Sci-Fi francheise (sp?) it remains an important part of the genre but a great film? I think not. I loved it however and while I was hoping they would move to a more adult contemperary story with Phantom I have to say it was pretty much in line with the other 3 (Jar Jar = Ewoks even though I like the Ewoks better). The different was the dark nature of Empire. Maybe we'll get lucky and he'll sneak in a dark more adult film in the middle like last time. By the way the writing and the acting in empire wasn't any better it was just darker.

      That said, I loved the Star Wars movies and even the new one but LOTR did rock. =)

    41. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever read any of his co-written books...dude needs a writer to flesh out his ideas...trust me.

      His ideas are amazing but his writing and implementation always leaves a little to be desired.

    42. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Katharine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I very much enjoyed the original three films when I was a young girl. I can't be the only one who did.

      Here here! I also loved the original films as a young girl-- and I still like them. On the other hand, part of the reason that I liked the "Battlestar Galactica" television show was the extreme cuteness (to a girl my age at the time) of Starbuck and Apollo. For that matter, by the time "Empire" came out, I was more than aware of the physical attractiveness of Han Solo. My point is, it's quite possible to make a movie that has certain attractions to young girls without compromising things like plot and characterization. ("Battlestar's" problems were unrelated to the choice of actors.)

      I keep thinking of how the Star Wars prequels would have come out if Lucas had hired someone interesting to write them, like Harlan Ellison or even C.S. Friedman.

    43. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by taloobie · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm all for boy bands in Stars Wars as long as they give Britney a cameo and put her in a skimpy Carrie Fischer outfit and chain her to a yonger, thinner Jabba played by Meatloaf. Also I'd love it if Ewan MacGregor busts out some Moulin Rouge songs. Harry Potter forever!

    44. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by orcus · · Score: 1

      Ok, just for the sake of argument, I'll agree that both EP1 and EP4 are targetted at 13 year old kids.
      Now - what does this tell us?
      Personally I think it is a sad reflection on the current crop of 13 year old kids compared to the crop in 1977...

      --
      First they burn books, then they burn people.
    45. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Ionized · · Score: 1

      [shrug] i think its just a story that some rich eccentric guy wanted to turn into a movie and have fun with. people make it out to be a big schpiel, how the originals were so amazing, blah blah, and now he's sold out, doing it for the money, yadda yadda. whatever.

      the originals were enjoyable. ep1 was enjoyable. ep2 will probably be enjoyable as well. none of them are masterpieces.

      all the fanboys getting their panties in a bunch piss me off with their misplaced ranting.

    46. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by trazom28 · · Score: 1

      Good thought.. but well.. in a swordfight the broomstick would last longer :)

      --
      {} ------ When I think of a good sig, I'll put it here
    47. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Peyna · · Score: 2
      I also grew up loving the Simpsons, I loved it when I was younger 10-11 years ago, and I love it now that I am 20 years old. The Simpsons has grown with its target audience over time, and has matured at a pretty similar rate; thus it's continued success.

      What is the point in having a series of movies if 1/2 the people like 1/2 the movies and the other 1/2 like the other 1/2 of the movies. It would make more sense to model the target demographic to an already established fan base than to attempt to acquire a new one.

      --
      What?
    48. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone else think Samuel Jackson (Mace Windu) seemed way too annoyed about Anakin Skywalker? I mean first he goes and says "You speak of the one who will bring balance to the force" Later when Liam Neason(Qui Gonn - and the only decently acted character) asks to bring Anakin to the council, Jackson rolls his eyes, and says "bring him before us then" WTF? Why would he be annoyed? Mad, scared, sad maybe. But annoyed? That was stupid. If you are going to have a role in the most anticipated movie of all time, at least do some research on the character's motivation. BTW, I think Samuel Jackson is an excellent actor in most cases, but he was either directed very badly for this flick, or he just didn't give a shit about it in which case the casting director was a complete moron. It's BOTH the writing and the directing. There are some DAMN talented actors in Episode1, and it's no coincidence that Episode1 is also the worst acting that each and every one of them has done. Ewan, Liam, Sam, Terence, Nat, etc., they all were horrible, and it's because of the writing and terrible directing. I saw an interview with Harrison Ford awhile back, and he was talking about some of the crappy dialogue that Lucas tried to use in the original movie, and Ford said, "George, you can write this shit, but I just can't say it!". Stilted, awkward, etc. The scenes between Amidala and Anakin in Ep.1 are among the worst in movie history, and all spy reports say the dialogue in the love scenes between Hayden and Nat is just as bad as in Ep.1. Oh goody. I am officially not excited about Ep.2 now. N'Sync was the clincher. "Worst episode ever." - Comic Book Guy

    49. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone else think Samuel Jackson (Mace Windu) seemed way too annoyed about Anakin Skywalker? I mean first he goes and says "You speak of the one who will bring balance to the force" Later when Liam Neason(Qui Gonn - and the only decently acted character) asks to bring Anakin to the council, Jackson rolls his eyes, and says "bring him before us then" WTF? Why would he be annoyed? Mad, scared, sad maybe. But annoyed? That was stupid. If you are going to have a role in the most anticipated movie of all time, at least do some research on the character's motivation. BTW, I think Samuel Jackson is an excellent actor in most cases, but he was either directed very badly for this flick, or he just didn't give a shit about it in which case the casting director was a complete moron.

      It's BOTH the writing and the directing. There are some DAMN talented actors in Episode1, and it's no coincidence that Episode1 is also the worst acting that each and every one of them has ever done in their entire careers. Ewan, Liam, Sam, Terence, Nat, etc., they all were horrible, and it's because of the writing and terrible directing.

      I saw an interview with Harrison Ford awhile back, and he was talking about some of the crappy dialogue that Lucas tried to use in the original trilogy, and Ford said he said to George, "George, you can write this shit, but I just can't say it!" and he gave an example, and it was indeed horrible. Stilted, awkward, etc. The scenes between Amidala and Anakin in Ep.1 are among the worst in movie history, and all spy reports say the dialogue in the love scenes between Hayden and Nat is just as bad as in Ep.1. Oh goody. I am officially not excited about Ep.2 now. N'Sync was the clincher.

      "Worst episode ever." - Comic Book Guy

    50. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by 8string · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing this when I was a kid! I thought maybe mom had just put "special" mushrooms on the pizza again and the whole thing was a halucination!

      Didn't they also do a chanuka special with "Jewbacca"...

      hehe

    51. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by T3KL3R · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the young female dollar is the easiest to tap into. There taste is the most predictable and the most malleable. That's why so much pop music is geared towards their market.

    52. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I have to take issue with whether or not EP1 was enjoyable. It was missing many of the elements which made the original films so enjoyable. What happened to the aliens that *didn't* speak english? Are we so dense that we can't read subtitles? Instead we get retarded chinese and jewish accents. Like an alien race learning english is gonna end up sounding chinese. Gimme a break.
      What happened to characters that the audience feels compelled to care about? Nobody cares about a little Life-cereal commercial reject yelling Yippee! as if he's prodded with a cow shocker. Nobody had time to care about Obi-Wan's master because the dialog was so thin and he died like a chump. If all the Jedi Masters fought like him, well, there's no wonder the Jedi Masters died out. I've seen more compelling battle between He-Man and Skeletor.
      What happened to daring space battles? That's about 50% of the original movies. Instead EP1 gave us Mikey accidentally hitting the Patented Self Destruct mechanism in the mothership his first try. Bravo! Nice battle.
      What happened to the mysticism of the Force? Now it was discovered, many decades predating the original movies, that the Force is the result of genetic makeup and it can be measured with a Palm Pilot. Stupid.

      I could go on but EP1 is full of so many flaws that make it boring and unwatchable I'd need about 300 pages to critique it. It sucked, the new movies will suck, Lucas sucks, end of story. We can always enjoy the old ones though.

    53. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by MrFrank · · Score: 1

      No it would not. If he wanted to stay true to the Star Wars "heritage" then he would. If he wants to keep making movies, he'll keep doing the way he is now.

      The hardcore Star Wars fans will see the movie no matter what. I probaly will just because it's Star Wars. Then he can capture the other half of the demographics with the boy bands. This way the production corporations will keep buying his movies, cause they know they can make a killing on them.

    54. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that Irvin Kershner is very well alive. I mean how would he been able to direct RoboCop 2 1 decade later otherwise????

    55. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by thing12 · · Score: 1

      Doh, what the hell was I thinking/saying. I was thinking of Leigh Brackett who co-wrote Empire.

    56. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by batwingTM · · Score: 1
      I really loved the first 3 films (4-6) but they were from a different time. I, and I think I'm the only one, really enjoyed Phantom Menance. Sure it had it's bad points, but I feel that it made up for it in other ways. I'm not going to debate them, I liked it and that's all I need.


      But Phantom Menance wasn't the same as ANH, ESB and ROTJ. Different story, different period, different characters. I wasn't expecting it to be like the trilogy, and I wasn't dissapointed.


      But I think the major thing that people are forgetting is the George Lucas owns Star Wars, it is His story, his ideas he can do with it what he pleases. Maybe these where the ideas he had all along, maybe he made them up just before he started writing Episode one. I don't know. But it is his to play with not mine.


      I admit that if I had made episode one I would have done it drastically different But I didn't and I couldn't.


      we don't have to like what George Lucas has done, but we cannot stop him


      Trav

      --
      Leg Godt!
    57. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bah. fuck the film industry.

  7. You miss the irony by fleener · · Score: 5, Funny

    The movie is titled 'Attack of the Clones.' The film would not be complete without 'NSync. I'm just disappointed that Backstreet Boys, New Kids on the Block, and 98 Degrees will not have cameos.

    1. Re:You miss the irony by bablooo · · Score: 1

      When are my mod points when you really need them???

      Someone please mod up the parent post.... please please please

    2. Re:You miss the irony by Skyshadow · · Score: 1

      Best. Comment. Ever.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    3. Re:You miss the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think he missed the irony? And that you had to explain it to everyone?

    4. Re:You miss the irony by webword · · Score: 1

      JS rocks.

    5. Re:You miss the irony by RoninM · · Score: 5, Funny

      The others don't need cameos -- 'NSync can play them.

      --
      If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
    6. Re:You miss the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Lucas can get Britney Spears to play with my light saber. Even Natalie Portman would be alright.

    7. Re:You miss the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand. Explain your question to me again. Are you speaking English?

      Where am I?

    8. Re:You miss the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I've been spotted. Time to change my name again.

    9. Re:You miss the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see it now - 'NSync as 98 Degrees in Disney's "Backstreet Boys: Behind The Fame." With a cameo by Jessica Simpson as Britney Spears.

      /me goes to gouge out his eyes, ears and brain

    10. Re:You miss the irony by philologist · · Score: 1

      More like ``Attack of the Clowns'' (obvious pun, I guess...)

      --

  8. Yeah, well... by Latent+IT · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now you know why Episode II is called Attack of the Clones. ;p

  9. Eh oh by whee · · Score: 0

    Let's just hope kids don't start using NSYNC dolls as masturbation toys now D:

    Although... hmm...

    *fap* *fap* *fap*

  10. Re:FUCK by JimE+Griff · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Not my choice of words, but if its true about them being in the movie thats really too bad. I bet I still am going to see it, out of love for 4,5,&6. Its start wars. Even I couldn't srew it up that bad. --JimE

    --
    Jimmy _______ | | | \__/
  11. Target Demographic by ddillman · · Score: 1

    The target demographic of the Star Wars movies has NOT changed. Merely, those who were the target demographic have now aged out of that demographic.

    --
    Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
    1. Re:Target Demographic by vanguard · · Score: 2

      I see this thought all the time but I can't agree with it. The first two episodes appealed to adults. They were geared towards a broad demographic but they certainly appealed to adults. They were movie classics.

      The three most recent movies were for kids. I want a Star Wars movie that appeals to me but I'd settle for one that appealed to the original demographic. The taget did move. It happened in the 80's with the damn ewoks were given a starring role.

      --
      That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
    2. Re:Target Demographic by D+Anderson+n'Swaart · · Score: 1

      Don't be such a tight-arsed snob. "Growing up" isn't supposed to involve losing your sense of fun. The Ewoks rocked. And I still have a teddy bear. And I'm 18. By social law, it seems that I shouldn't be seen dead admitting to either of those things. Why?

    3. Re:Target Demographic by Pyrosophy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately, the target demographic has not changed, as you say. But kids have grown less and less adult-like -- they've gotten dumbed down and will grow up immune to any aesthetic quality. Not that this is any problem to the studios... costs less to pay a writer who isn't as good.

      It's either that, or the target demographic has narrowed. Star Wars was clearly marketed towards children AND adults, the former of whom will be entertained by ANYTHING with fur or robotic parts. Case in point is the Muppet Movie, which had furry muppets that kids could enjoy, while adults had fun with the witty dialogue. Newer movies leave the adults out of the equation, reasoning that the kids won't "get" the movie. But they're not there for the storyline -- they just want to see fur and robots (and if at all possible, furry robots!)

      So for God's sake, market all you want towards the children, but at least give the adults a darn script that's worth listening to. Kids grow to understand it as they get older. That's how you MAKE a classic for christsake.

    4. Re:Target demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the problem is, is that the 'Star Wars' universe has engrossed a much greater following than was ever expected. It's analagous to trekkies, only on a much bigger scale (check http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/22641 .html). George Lucas, however, seems to refuse to acknowledge these 'die hard' fans, and instead aims the movies in the direction which will earn the most money, ie kids. While I am no die hard fan of star wars (that is, i don't own a light sabre), i do no like this. However, lets face it, it was his creation and he can do what he likes with it. Just dont expect me to wait in line for 10 hrs waiting for tickets.

    5. Re:Target Demographic by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      The ewoks fucking sucked. I was 18 when I saw it. They were annoying things obviously injected into the plot just to sell toys and to market to kids. The previous poster was right: The first two movies were good movies with a wide demographic and a lack of 'cutsey' crap like ewoks and jar-jar. Lucas sold out with Return of the Jedi, and did double-time with Phantom Menace (and added offensive racial stereotypes on top of it all, instead of inventing new languages and dialects as he had for Yoda and the Huts, etc, in previous movies. What a cop out).

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    6. Re:Target demographic by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Star Wars had a budget of $11 million US dollars.

      Boy George directed American Grifiti before that just so that he could do Star Wars (it was part of his deal with Fox).

      But George Lucas has never been that great of a director to begin with, and he has always been, and will always be, stuck in the whole 1950's sci-fi thing. Attack of the Clones! The Empire Strikes Back! Revenge of the Jedi! (renamed to Return of the Jedi when George Lucas found out that Star Trek II was going to be called Revenge of Kahn) Although Star Trek II's title was changed to Wrath of Khan, Georgie boy kept Return of the Jedi as the title for Episode VI.

      It is no surprise that Episode V, while not directed by George Lucas and certainly not the most successful of the first 3 films (due to its depressing end; Han Solo captured, Luke Skywalker -1 hand, the Rebellion shattered), is generally regarded as being the best of the first 3. It has the best cinematography, the best story, is the best directed, and has the least "cheese" of the first 3.

      Or maybe George Lucas is out of Kurosawa films to copy (A New Hope is very similar to Akira Kurosawa's film The Hidden Fortress) ;-P

    7. Re:Target demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, it was named return of the jedi because jedi's do not seek revenge. it was too malicious. i saw the making so i know.

    8. Re:Target Demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. The first two episodes were the only ones that are worthy of the fan base the star wars franchise has accumulated. If Phantom Menace was a stand-a-alone science ficition movie the DVD would be selling for $6.99 next to Red Planet and Sphere.

      Lucas is proof of the principle that more is not better. In 1976 with a limited budget, unproven effects technology and a host of other constraints he created a film that still holds up today. Yet now with his own studio, incredible technology and a huge audience just waiting to see his handiwork all Lucas could show after three years of work was the crap titled the phantom menace.

      His problem is that he has bought into his own PR and now he thinks he's the next Walt Disney. He's lost it. Don't expect much from episode 2.

    9. Re:Target demographic by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      Then you should also know that that explanation is the public one. The poster before you got it right. It was changed because of Star Trek II. The reason was then later changed to match what you wrote.

    10. Re:Target Demographic by Alfiekins · · Score: 1

      I think you underestimate children. When Douglas Adams wrote for Doctor Who he said that you had to make the plots complicated enough for the kids to enjoy and simple enough for the adults to enjoy. Kids can handle alot more complexity than Holloywood marketing people can appreciate.

      In general it is hard to compare the original trilogy with TPM, even in terms of demographics because the two trilogies face two different audiences: one that did not know how the trilogy would end and one that does. The OT had surprise on its side. We didn't know what was going to happen. With the prequels we know what the end is. Star Wars is a major part of popular culture now. We all know so much about it. This calls for a different approach to the drama on screen. Lucas knows that we are watching TPM looking for clues to why Anakin turned, how Palpatine became emperor etc. So he gives us in TPM a great action film with astonishing set pieces but with a plot line that goes "Look how Palpatine became Supreme Chancellor. Look what he'll do to get power. Look how the Jedi will not act decisively when Anakin is brought before them. Look at the good people manipulated by others. Doesn't this scare you because you know where this will all end up?

      Essentially TPM is a much more complicated beast than people make it out to be. It has a wonderfully foreboding atmosphere and is extremely frank about how easy it was for Palpatine to achieve his goals due to bureaucracy, procrastination and willful blindness of those around him. That is what is there for the adults, the kids and the fans and I believe that it fulfills Douglas Adams requirements admirably..

    11. Re:Target Demographic by Hast · · Score: 1
      Essentially TPM is a much more complicated beast than people make it out to be. It has a wonderfully foreboding atmosphere and is extremely frank about how easy it was for Palpatine to achieve his goals due to bureaucracy, procrastination and willful blindness of those around him.

      Yes, I have told a lot of people about this. Pointed out what actually happen in TPM. Not all that many people have thought of it before. (Which I have met that is.) And I think this qualifies as something genuinely good in TPM.

      Unfortunately it is completely buried under loads of garbage. My guess is that most people don't see the "deeper meaning" of TPM because the entire movie suggest that there are no hidden parts.

      My guess is that these good parts are the few remnants of what TPM could have been. Much like when you see a movie adaptation of a book and suddenly something brilliant happen. Sometimes that brillians is there in spite of the director. It is there because in the original there were something shining bright enough to actually shine through everything the director put on top of it.
    12. Re:Target Demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said yourself that you're only 18. Why would anyone be surprised that you have a teddy bear and like Ewoks?

    13. Re:Target Demographic by danger42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, what you are saying goes against recent studies.

      For example, take a comparison of "Sesame Street" and "Blues Clues". The former has lots of witty dialog and adult humour (at least it did originally) in addition to the simple morality tales and vignettes that teach counting numbers. The latter has none of that but repetition and cute and cuddly animals.

      Which do you think is better for children? Your argument would seem to indicate you think Sesame Street is the better show. However, recent studies suggest that it is not. Kids don't appreciate the humour and end up getting confused or bored by what you consider to be sly in-jokes. Parents make the mistake of thinking that their children on some level will learn to appreciate these bits. They don't. Children don't learn that way. The sooner you learn this the better.

      For an explanation of studies read the book "The Tipping Point".

      --
      -nd
    14. Re:Target Demographic by Sodium+Attack · · Score: 2
      Case in point is the Muppet Movie, which had furry muppets that kids could enjoy, while adults had fun with the witty dialogue. Newer movies leave the adults out of the equation, reasoning that the kids won't "get" the movie.


      Some do, certainly. So did some kids' movies from the 1970s. But it's far from universal. In fact, 2001 saw not one but two "kids'" movies which are enjoyable for adults as well: Shrek and Monsters, Inc. (I highly recommend both--and I'm 30 years old and don't have children.)

      --

      Never take moderation advice from sigs, including this one.

    15. Re:Target Demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't say Star Wars was a better "learning" model... He simply said that it had elements which interested both kids and adults - a trait often found among many movie "classics" (e.g. Indiana Jones)

      I for one agree with him - the original trilogy would not have had such an impact if it was something you couldn't "grow into" ... TPM offers nothing to grow into...

    16. Re:Target Demographic by Pyrosophy · · Score: 1

      Exactly.... and my claim is that TPM was way below even those two movies' standards. There are at least parts in those two movies where only the adults laughed. TPM scatters those kinds of moments and makes them scarcely important so there is more time for Pod Races and Ship chases.

      Please, George, at least give us something that's a kid's movie's equivalent of Shrek, rather than the dreck that was TPM. If that's possible, why not get us the equivalent of LOTR? Kids love that, even though it's obviously marketed towards adults.

    17. Re:Target demographic by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      empire made more money than ROTJ in terms of adjusted dollars, see my other post with the website.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  12. Welcome to commercial culture by aufecht · · Score: 0

    C'mon! Wouldn't this be the equivalent of Menudo or some other really bad boy band of the day asking for a part in the one of the original 3 films? George Lucas would have said hell no. This is just ridiculous. 10 years from now Nsync will be laughed at even more than they are now and Attack of the Clones will be a big joke.

    1. Re:Welcome to commercial culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps. But the first trollogy was not aimed at teeny bopers. It contained actual content. Unlike Episode 1, and from the sound of it Episode 2. From what I understood, there are alot of u nderlying social political issues that cpuld have been highlited in these films, but intsead they decided to entertain little screaming teenage girls.

  13. please sir, dont destroy my soul by SmellMyTeenSpirit · · Score: 0

    no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    it hurts...so...much

    --
    "Cornflakes are not the innocent critters they seem"- Sterling Morrison
  14. urge to kill rising, rising... by eexlebots · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the New Year and God still hates me.

    --
    ***
    1. Re:urge to kill rising, rising... by absolut_kurant · · Score: 1

      hate god back. works for me. (apologies to mel gibson) :)

      --
      Yes.
    2. Re:urge to kill rising, rising... by destiney · · Score: 1
  15. Bring it on! by x136 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Put all the talentless boy bands (redundant, I know) in the movie. As long as:

    a) They don't talk, or "sing."
    b) They get killed off post-haste.

    Given these two rules, it would be quite enjoyable.

    --
    SIGFEH
    1. Re:Bring it on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have lots of talent. It's just that the record industry makes them sing crappy songs. It's not their fault they're puppets.

    2. Re:Bring it on! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Even better if they get killed off very bloodily, torn to shreds by the droids. A long shot showing their bloody remains (with recognizable faces for all the 13-year-old Nsync fans) would also be nice.

    3. Re:Bring it on! by EvlPenguin · · Score: 1

      I was picturing some kind of Mortal Kombat 2 deal, myself. Rip their bodies to peices and just preserve their faces with a bit of dangling entrails. But it would have to look realistic enough to make the 12 year old girls have nightmares akin to them being locked in a small room with Frank Zappa and Marilyn Manson.

      --

      --
      #nohup cat /dev/dsp > /dev/hda & killall -9 getty
    4. Re:Bring it on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not their fault

      Yes, it is.

  16. Wheres Wald.... N Sync? by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

    The guys will be seen for a fleeting moment in a "big scene with lots of extras."

    Sounds like a fun game for whoever buys the DVD...

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    1. Re:Wheres Wald.... N Sync? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A more fun game would be to try and shoot them with A-Wing blasters, as they drift hopelessly in space. I Imagine that it's possible to do.

  17. how bad by Municipa · · Score: 2, Funny

    how much worse does it have to get before I'm sorry I ever saw the first movies.

    1. Re:how bad by mgblst · · Score: 1

      How much worse will it get before we dont go to see the upcoming movies? Probably not even possible! GL is just taunting us.

    2. Re:how bad by Municipa · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. I wish I could say I won't see it.. but I know I will. I'll even see it in the theater... damn me!!!

    3. Re:how bad by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      I don't really understand the question - didn't anyone notice how crap Return of the Jedi was? That Lucas then took the piss out of the world by tinkering with the trilogy for a cynical re-release didn't really surprise us much - that Episode 1 was so crap DID surprise me. If you just stick to watching Star Wars and the Empire Strikes Back, you can still maintain the illusion that the franchise isn't completely awful. Shit, even the toys weren't all that great - my X-Wing and Falcon were built like crap - the only SW figures that survived my childhood were my R2D2 and my Gamorrean Guard. F**K OFF and die Mr Lucas.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:how bad by Municipa · · Score: 1

      I was too young when I saw RotJ to think it was cheesy. I loved it, but I'll even admit, having watched it many times later that it got a little stupidly cutesy. I guess I was around 9-12 when I saw it.. hmm if that's who's being targeted now, it's a sad commentary on the crap kids like - or maybe it's just what they think kids will like.

  18. Easter Eggs by Gte · · Score: 1

    I think this should have been buried as an Easter Egg, like the ET scene in The Phantom Menace.

    I much prefer to learn "Fascinating" trivia about a film a few months after I've seen it ;)

    1. Re:Easter Eggs by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Months after? I spotted 'em right away. My gf was wondering what the hell got me so excited :)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Easter Eggs by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Maybe she thought you had a thing for Jar-Jar.

  19. Who sold out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm. Are you sure it wasn't NSYNC who sold out?

  20. Entertainment...USs' biggest cultural export by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder the world is such a barren wasteland.

  21. is anybody really surpised... by Gavitron_zero · · Score: 1

    Movies and TV tend to have a serious problem with being on the trailing edge of pop culture...has anybody heard of a show called Popstars? Here in Canada, the band they made is doing terribly and they are about to air the creation of another... Stupid television...

    1. Re:is anybody really surpised... by arsaspe · · Score: 1

      Oh GOD I hated that show. Here in Australia we had to watch two seasons of it. The results? Bardot and Scandil'us. Both of which disapeared as soon as TV show did.

    2. Re:is anybody really surpised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You HAD to watch two seasons of episodes?

    3. Re:is anybody really surpised... by DjReagan · · Score: 1

      >Oh GOD I hated that show. Here in Australia we had to watch two seasons of it.

      You *had* to? Is there something wrong with your tv so that you can't turn it off or change the channel?

      --
      "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"
    4. Re:is anybody really surpised... by metalLeg · · Score: 1

      Well it is a penal colony....

    5. Re:is anybody really surpised... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      There is a version of that show here in Germany, and they have so far created two bands which have been pretty successful (afaik), one is a Spice Girls clone and the other one has male and female members. Their music has the average quality of what you see in MTV, but hey, that's what sells these days.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    6. Re:is anybody really surpised... by arsaspe · · Score: 1

      You havn't seen Australian TV... Popstars was about the best show on.

  22. Time for war. by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
    (Checks calander, sees that it's not April First)

    Well, ladies and gentlemen, I see that it's time to put all of that first-person shooter training to work and invade Skywalker ranch. An unopened original Bubba Fett action figure to whoever brings me Lucas's head on a pike!

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Time for war. by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

      Is that the Arkansas brother of Boba Fett?

      --

      Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

    2. Re:Time for war. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Checks calander, sees that it's not April First)
      And you did that by hovering your mouse over the time, didn't you?
    3. Re:Time for war. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, like someone who mentions "Bubba Fett" really cares about the Star Wars movies...and don't try to pass that off as a typo....

    4. Re:Time for war. by Skyshadow · · Score: 1

      I'll pass it off to never having seen it spelled...

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    5. Re:Time for war. by trog · · Score: 2
      I'll pass it off to never having seen it spelled...

      Not even on your unopened box?

      Jackass.

    6. Re:Time for war. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      The gruelling battle ended with the victory of... TROG!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  23. Okay, maybe I was wrong. by Latent+IT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, my last comment, "Now you know why Episode II is called Attack of the Clones" was beaten to the punch by fifteen seconds. Durn. But it took me less time to change my mind about the whole thing.

    I hate boy bands as much as the next guy. But 'NSYNC was darn funny in their Simpsons episode. They spent the whole 18 minutes making fun of themselves after all. They can't be ALL bad.

    *beep* *beep*

    Oh no! Our clothing is out of style by 15 minutes! Quickly, to bananna republic!

    Ynav eht Nioj!

    1. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by jgerman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, disregarding the fact that it's only a few seconds and they will be unrecognizable. It's a poor move to date a movie with a current fad in pop culture. In ten years people will hear this and think who? A tv show can generally get away with it because of the format, tv shows are contemporary by nature whereas a movie that locks itself into something like this is doomed.

      These shitheads are just a short lived trend, not that that matters. Looking at past movies you can see that huge stars, from outside the movie industry generally seem to make the movie worse.

      Personally, I'm happiest when a movie doesn't have any huge names at all you usually get a more enjoyable experience because the actors don't carry the baggage that someone you've seen in a number of movies does.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    2. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by 4minus0 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm happiest when a movie doesn't have any huge names at all you usually get a more enjoyable experience because the actors don't carry the baggage that someone you've seen in a number of movies does
      I agree with this statement 100%. This makes a movie so much more realistic in my opionion. How am I to believe that the star of the movie I'm watching is actually that character when I watched them guest star on a shitbag sitcom yesterday? Let's hear it for Indie films!

      --
      You've got an easy breezy wind at your back...most of the time.
    3. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by Mahonrimoriancumer · · Score: 1

      You mean like Vanilla Ice in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2?

      --
      So climate's changing. So what? It has always changed. The big news would be if it wasn't changing. - Dr. Philip Stone
    4. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, isn't Vanilla Ice still popular?

      Next you'll tell me my Skidz pants are out of style...

    5. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by GrandCow · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm happiest when a movie doesn't have any huge names at all you usually get a more enjoyable experience because the actors don't carry the baggage that someone you've seen in a number of movies does.

      <cough>
      Ah-nold

      <coughcough>I'll be back<coughcough>

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    6. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by aka-ed · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In ten years people will hear this and think who?

      I'm happiest when a movie doesn't have any huge names at all you usually get a more enjoyable experience because the actors don't carry the baggage that someone you've seen in a number of movies does.

      Um...you don't see a contradiction here? If they're saying "who?" then there's no baggage.

      I agree with Conan O'Brien: Lucas did it "to make C3PO look less gay."

      That is, if he did it at all. I suspect the newspaper stories were sourced (uncredited) from ananova, which credits a fan site. Any Kubrick fans here? Do you remember the outrageous rumors about the plot of Eyes Wide Shut? There has not yet been any official source on this.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    7. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      Personally, I'm happiest when a movie doesn't have any huge names at all you usually get a more enjoyable experience because the actors don't carry the baggage that someone you've seen in a number of movies does.

      Well, not in all cases, but in general the 'big stars' are the ones who can act. Carrie Fisher and Mark Hammel couldn't really, thats why they never ended up as big stars after Starwars (unlike Harrison Ford).

      Good actors can act good (duh) and they make you forget that you've seen them before in other films.

      Of course, it was kind of distracting when a friend pointed out that the elf lord in rivendale was the guy who played Agent Smith in the Matrix. It didn't bother me though, I mostly just thought it was cool :P

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    8. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by Chester+K · · Score: 2

      Well, disregarding the fact that it's only a few seconds and they will be unrecognizable. It's a poor move to date a movie with a current fad in pop culture. In ten years people will hear this and think who? A tv show can generally get away with it because of the format, tv shows are contemporary by nature whereas a movie that locks itself into something like this is doomed.

      On the other hand, SpiceWorld is just as good today as it was the day it came out.

      The punchline is left as an exercise for the reader.

      --

      NO CARRIER
    9. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by Redhawk · · Score: 2

      Actually...

      Mark Hamill does some very excellent voice-over work. He's the voice of the Joker in the Batman animated series and its associated spinoffs.

      Just so you know.

      Redhawk

    10. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by jgerman · · Score: 2

      I won't deny that there are some actors that can help you forget the other movies they are in, but it's not as simple as being a good actor, it's visual recognition more than anything else. You associate the appearance of an actor with certain movies and roles as much as, if not more than, anything else. Arnold S. will always be the Terminator, Sarah Michelle Gellar will always be Buffy, and Jim Carrey will always be an idiot.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    11. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      are just a short lived trend
      unfortunatly, there not.
      Boy bands have been around to long to be considered a short lived trend. Nsync has been around how long ? 10+ years?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But 'NSYNC was darn funny in their Simpsons episode

      No, the writers were. These gene-spliced fuckwads are nothing more than puppets who serve their idiotic audience greasy turds on a plate.

    13. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Well, disregarding the fact that it's only a few seconds and they will be unrecognizable. It's a poor move to date a movie with a current fad in pop culture. In ten years people will hear this and think who?

      Jeez, how can you "disregard" the fact that they appear in a mass battle scene for a few seconds and then go away forever (in the film)? They don't appear in foreground, they don't appear as themselves, they aren't distinguished visually - the movie doesn't depend on them AT ALL, so why is it "dated" by their being in it in this manner?

    14. Re:Okay, maybe I was wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sting was ok in "Dune".

      Steve Vai made "Crossroads".

      Rowdy Roddy Piper and Keith David will forever be remembered for their work in "They Live" long after their other careers are (were) forgotten.

      Uh oh, I seem to have dated myself as an 80s guy.

  24. As I heard it... by X_Bones · · Score: 1

    I was watching some entertainment show on TV tonight and this story came on. Evidently, Lucas' daughters asked their dad to put N'Sync in the movie, and he agreed to a cameo role for them as extras in a huge scene with lots of people. No need to freak; it's not like they're gonna have real parts in the film.

    1. Re:As I heard it... by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

      Sorry to disappoint you, but they're probably gonna have parts. Body parts that is, as they are going to get blown to bits.

  25. The Downward Spiral of Lucas by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    About three years ago, I sat in a theater that was about to show "Wing Commander." Why? Because they were going to show the "Star Wars" trailer. As the lights darkened and the projector fired up, the words "Lucasfilms" showed up on the screen. That was all it took to get the entire crowd to erupt in a tremendous cheer.

    Then, Ep I came out.

    Recently, I sat in a theater awaiting LOTR. "Lucasfilms" showed up on the screen. The audience collectively yawned. We've already been burned once by Lucas; we're pretty sure that AOTC is going to suck. Jar Jar, a lame-ass title, and now N'Sync pretty much confirm that.

    1. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Actually, I saw LotR not for the Lucas garb, but for the Legend of the Rangers trailer. Which I was in the wrong theatre for... :-\

      Heres a page about the other LotR. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheer up. There are reports that we will get to see Natlie Portman's naked ass in this film (seriously)...

    3. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 1

      After all, it will have steamy jedi love scenes. Now if only I had the force to use on the chicks...

      --


      Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
    4. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by sasha328 · · Score: 1

      Three years ago, I lined up to watch Episode I. I left the theatre thinking thinking to myself, Ah well. Glad it is over, I won't bother watching it again. I had to think about it, but the reason I disliked the movie, was the inclusion of some characters from the "future" when there was absolutely no need to like C3P0. Also, including scenes that, to me, did not add anything to the plot, like the race... Also, it was not funny like the "sequels".
      That said, I want to watch the ATOC always hoping that things have improved.
      Just my 0.02?

    5. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      R2D2 has been around for a while, thats why its so eccentric.

      C3P0 didn't seem to grow too much in 4-6, probably because he wasn't born yesterday in those episodes.

      I'd wait for Lucas to tie the series together before bashing him about their existance in hte known past. Just me though.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    6. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Also, including scenes that, to me, did not add anything to the plot, like the race...

      Umm, remember Star Wars IV ?
      When Obi-Wan met Anakin, he had already been a good pilot.
      Lucas needed something to show off Anakin's pilot background.

    7. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by kilrogg · · Score: 1
      "Mini Austin" got the biggest roar when I saw LoTR.

      If you remember, the "Spy who Shaged me" trailer went: "If you see one movie this summer, see Star Wars; if you see two, see Austin powers".

      Now they say: "If you see one movie this summer, see Austin Powers; if you see two, see Austin Powers a second time.

      I think that says it all :-)

    8. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by Random+Man · · Score: 1

      Same happened when I saw LOTR. Total silence for the AOTC trailer. Though I did hear someone three rows back whisper to his date that it "looked worse than the last one."

      The Spiderman preview, however, got raves.

    9. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by calebp · · Score: 1

      funny, whereI saw LOTR, I didnt get the ATOC or spiderman trailer, only, "collateral damage" I feel cheated somehow.

      --
      ________________
      "A man prepared who hesitates, is lost." -Dante The Divine Comedy: Inferno Canto XXVIII, 99
    10. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      We got that "who stole all the magic" car commercial or whatever, you shoulda heard the booing!

    11. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
      Clearly you dont know where Lucas got his insperation for the SW series.

      There was some movie from the 50s that detaled the lives of a pair of slaves. The 'slaves' in SW are C3P0 and R2D2... They are the two main characters and they are the characters who will be in all 3x3=9 movies...

    12. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by Chokai · · Score: 1

      During a LOTR showing in Seattle large parts of the audience actually laughed (and not in the "this is funny sense") during the trailer. There were numerous comments from people of all ages around me about how pathetic the trailer looked. Oh well the only person I know who liked EP1 was my 12 year old cousin. That's good for now but I doubt that EP1 will have the staying power in his mind that the original trilogy has in my generation.

    13. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by archen · · Score: 1

      Well on the flip side I might go to AOTC if there is a LOTR trailer...

      naw, screw that. I'd rather wait for the movie to come out...

    14. Re:The Downward Spiral of Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they've decided to make a slight variation on the same weak joke they used for the last movie. I agree, that says it all.

  26. uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by Jish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article says a few seconds in a scene with a lot of extras...

    Get a grip... nobody will notice unless you freeze frame the future dvd and then who really cares...

    If you want to make an opinion of the film before seeing it (which is kind of dumb) then at least do something like watch the trailers... which in my opinion are quite good!

    1. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by dozing · · Score: 1
      If you want to make an opinion of the film before seeing it (which is kind of dumb) then at least do something like watch the trailers... which in my opinion are quite good!

      If I don't attempt to make an opinion before I see the film I would end up seeing a lot of films that really suck. My time is worth too much to me.

      --
      Dozings.com -- Its kinda funny... If you're as crazy as me.
    2. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by dimator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not the logistics of their appearance, it's the reason that Lucas would put them in the movie: namely, so it will connect with a market that's not exactly taken with the whole Star Wars thang. Now, girls that would never pay to see anything like Star wars will do so to catch a glimpse of Justin, or Fag-wad, or whatever their names are.

      That's pretty fucking low, if you ask me. The market, and in fact the bottom line, has become a greater influence to Lucas' decisions than his creativity. Dis-fucking-gusting.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    3. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      How do you know thats why Lucas let in as extras? Maybe he justed wanted to them die on screen too.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    4. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by WannaBeGeekGirl · · Score: 1
      Maybe you should chill out and be a little less quick to describe the motivations of someone you don't seem to know much about. Lucas does what he wants becase *HE* wants to, the guy doesn't cater to markets or demographics. He's stated this in more than one interview. This is painstakingly obvious if you look back on his career: THX-1138, American Grafitti, Episode V. These were huge risks financially at the time.


      Lucas' only "bottom line" is his imagination. I'm no MBA, but if I were worried about the demographics I sure as hell wouldn't bring JarJar back after the backlash from Ep. I. (Even the kids thought JarJar was annoying!) Furthermore, the guy finances his own projects, he isn't doing this for some "market".

      --
      ~WBGG~ "And I'm so sad like a good book I can't put this Day Back a sorta fairytale with you" ~Tori Amos
    5. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by Nastard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, god forbid there should be any girls standing in line with us.

    6. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm not sure about you, but I don't want a bunch of teenager girls talking through the whole film and then when the 'climatic battle' happens for them to point and scream saying things like 'look there they are' etc.

    7. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by dimator · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Can you name any other reason that he might have to put NSync in one of his movies? I can't.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    8. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by sheriff_p · · Score: 1

      What a silly answer. Let's take a second. You're a member of N'Sync. You have some leverage within the entertainment for this reason. And, *wait*, then need extras for Star Wars? Ones whose appearence is so brief you don't need to act? Great! Oh hang on, let's pass up on the opportunity...

      You honestly think this is a plot by George Lucas to get 12 year old girls to see the film? Are you that paranoid and deluded? Don't you think perhaps that the guys in N'Sync simply wanted to be in a Star Wars movie? As far as I know, it's been kept pretty quiet. I read the first story about this over a week ago now - if they were in there to attract girls, I think it would have been more hyped.

      Keep your wang in your trousers, sparky.

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
    9. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by dimator · · Score: 2

      George Lucas gave up his integrity for:

      1) doing something for the sole reason of attracting the 12 year old girl market, or

      2) letting anyone with some clout be in the film, just because they're famous (which is also what happened with Sam Jackson).

      Pick one.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    10. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by sg3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > George Lucas gave up his integrity for:
      >
      > 1) doing something for the sole reason of attracting the 12 year old girl market, or

      Yeah, and the first three movies had so much integrity. That's why it was so crucial to the plot to have Carrie Fisher in a bikini for the first act of the ROTJ. It wasn't for the sole reason of attracting the 12 year old boy market.

      Everyone who is complaining about this should get over it. Lucas is putting in his daughters' favorite boy band, and they're going to die in a few seconds on film. What father wouldn't want to do that?

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    11. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I don't attempt to make an opinion before I see the film I would end up seeing a lot of films that really suck. My time is worth too much to me.

      So you're not going to see it, then?

    12. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you name any other reason that he might have to put NSync in one of his movies? I can't.

      How about his daughters asked him to, as a previous post mentioned him stating on one of the 'bloid shows? He does, after all, let them name characters.

    13. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by gir · · Score: 1
      Get a grip... nobody will notice unless you freeze frame the future dvd and then who really cares...

      We are talking about the creatures of the /. universe here. All we do is gripe and complain because we'd obviously do a much better job at telling someone else's story.

      I think it's funny when someone gripes like this about something. Yeah, the new movies aren't what remember the old ones as. Then again, people would be complaining if they were the exact same.

      It's just like the angsty kids who listen to all the trendy underground music and get mad when the second album sounds different than the first. Artists get bored and continue to expirement. While Lucas' expirementation has a huge franchise behind it, let's be kind enough to give the movie a chance.

      Most amusing point about the entire bit is that everyone complaining is still going to shell out the cash to see the movie multiple times.

      --
      stupid advertisement .sig
      www.angstmonster.org
    14. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by GreenJeepMan · · Score: 1

      There is one positive side to this. Those same girls that pay to see glimpes of their heart throbs may actually take an interest in the Star Wars saga and Sci Fi.

    15. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carrie Fisher in a bikini was crucial to the plot

      She was after all a sex slave...

    16. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
      No. If there is one thing I've learned, it is that there is no defending a sellout. Be it in general business, music, or any other form of entertainment. There is no defending the need to make extra millions when that person already has millions and millions of dollars.

      Lucas can go ahead and sellout. I'll take my respect elsewhere.

      --
      Berto
    17. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you start complaining about Lucas' principles about his f'chrissakes cameos and the marketing decisions behind Star Wars, you're too old for Star Wars anyway. Leave it behind, put on some sensible shoes, buy a minivan, get married, have kids, and start criticizing them for liking things that are less pure and good than when you were a kid.

    18. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by tibbetts · · Score: 1

      Anything that gets more teenage girls into a film that I want to watch can only be a Good Thing.

      --
      :wq
    19. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by CryptoRAT · · Score: 1

      I would not say that it ruins the film. However it does seem to casue damge to the principles of the story, mainly the reputation of the Jedi. Even though they are not a music group in the movie their real lives will carry over. (Think Madonna as Evita) This will alianate many of the traditional fans for the sake of profit. Who are these traditional fans? They are the kids who pretended to be Jedi becuase of their courage and integrity. Certainly they will recover in time, but until then Lucas has distanced himself and the movie from it's fans, much like baseball has done, in the search for profit. Is that the lesson a once proud Star Wars series should show it's audience? Who knows, but it is discouraging.

      --
      No, I don't have a heart.
    20. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The market, and in fact the bottom line, has become a greater influence to Lucas' decisions than his creativity.

      "has become" - Jesus fucking Christ... where have you been. Lucas stopped being any kind of artist a *long* time ago.

    21. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by sideshow · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you but those girls would get 20 years in jail.

      --

      Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    22. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a member of N'Sync. You have some leverage within the entertainment for this reason

      If you think that being a member of N'Sync gives any leverage then you better think again. Remember whats-her-name who left the Spice Girls and sturck out on her own? I imagine not. N'Sync require constant boosting from the record companies, once that is removed they'll disappear faster than, say, The New Kids on the Block.

    23. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by 2moon2 · · Score: 1

      It certainly does seem that Lucas is marketing to the little-girls demographic, but the method is ROMANCE, not pretty boys. I saw the preview a couple days ago - it was gawdawful mush for the most part. Neither Natalie Portman nor that hideous whoever-he-is (Anakin) can act worth a bean. There were some cool fancy space battle moments at the end, but it barely washed the vomit taste out of my mouth.

      loyal but disgusted girl star wars fan

      --
      "I think war is a dangerous place." - George Walker Bush, Washington, D.C., May 7, 2003
    24. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by WannaBeGeekGirl · · Score: 1
      First of all, I wasn't defending his choices, only his motivations. Even if I follow your reasoning, which implies that he gave NSync the part as extras to draw in extra millions, it doesn't make sense.


      Two of the guys from NSync made a movie earlier this year. It didn't even break even, despite the fact that it _starred_ boyband members. I'd wager that most people didn't even know it was out. How could having these guys as extras for a few seconds in a scene where you barely have time to see/recognize them draw in "extra millions" if no one went to see their other movie? Lucas isn't a dummy, he knows that by doing something like this its going to rumple some feathers. Do you really think it didn't occur to him that he might piss off the huge fanbase of non-15-yearold-girls with this decision? Like I stated in my previous message, he doesn't make movies so that they're popular. He makes movies that he wants to make. Maybe he's pompous or arrogant in that way, but a sellout? No way.


      Go ahead and take your respect elsewhere, but don't forget that there was a reason he had so much respect in the first place. He made some great movies. Good enough in fact, that I don't even think a small cameo by anyone (short of a terrorist) could ruin it.

      --
      ~WBGG~ "And I'm so sad like a good book I can't put this Day Back a sorta fairytale with you" ~Tori Amos
    25. Re:uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by yesthatguy · · Score: 1

      The *girls* would get twenty years in jail? Not the girls, the other guys in line maybe...

      --
      Yes! That guy!
  27. they should call it.... by pqbon · · Score: 1
    The proper title should be:

    Star Wars Episode II:
    Send In the Clones

    1. Re:they should call it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dood, are you kidding? ANYTHING WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER

      They could have called it "Episode 2: Cowboy Neal's Tounge" and it would have been better.

      All this extra shit is just icing on the turd.

  28. This might be ok by javacodewarrior · · Score: 1

    It could be ok, don't a lot of people die in this one ... could you think of anybody else who should.

    --
    http://www.funwithpenguins.com
  29. All the better by DeadBugs · · Score: 1

    I would pay good money to see Jabba The Hut graphically eat each member of the Back Sync Boys and then later crap out Britney Spears.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:All the better by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      All these days I thought that was makeup she was wearing...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  30. Umm, right. And Mark Hamill was from where? by jpellino · · Score: 4, Troll

    This isn't exactly a big departure from Lucas's stable...
    Hamill wasn't exactly a Royal Shakespearean himself...

    89. "Eight Is Enough" (1977) TV Series - David Bradford (1977)
    90. City, The (1977) (TV) - Eugene Banks
    91. Mallory: Circumstantial Evidence (1976) (TV) - Joe Celi
    92. Eric (1975) (TV) - Paul Swensen
    93. Delancey Street: The Crisis Within (1975) (TV) - Philip Donaldson
    94. Sarah T. - Portrait of a Teenage Alcoholic (1975) (TV) - Ken Newkirk
    95. "Texas Wheelers, The" (1974) TV Series - Doobie Wheeler
    96. "Jeannie" (1973) TV Series (voice) - Corey Anders
    97. "General Hospital" (1963) TV Series - Kent Murray

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  31. Perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I wonder if the movie has any HOT GAY POOPSEX

    1. Re:Perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would definitely INCREASE my desire to see it. (What? It's not called 'Attack of the colons'? Dammit, wrong theatre again!)

  32. you hypocrites! by minusthink · · Score: 5, Interesting

    listen, complain as much as you like, but it doesn't change the fact that you would get yourself casted in starwars, even for a brief cameo, if you had the power.

    so use the force or something. i never saw the movies.

    --
    "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
    1. Re:you hypocrites! by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1, Troll

      Do you also sing for 13 year old girls?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:you hypocrites! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just a bit on the side.

      but I don't see how that relates.

    3. Re:you hypocrites! by undecidable · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, but I don't believe that you're addressing the issue:

      We already don't like 'NSYNC. But now we're also (more) disappointed with Lucas.

      Sure, if I were 'NSYNC, I would try to get myself a cameo. But if I were Lucas, I would tell 'NSYNC to go F themselves.

      Does Lucas really need more money? I think the main disappointment with Lucas is that few artists have the financial opportunity to create what they really want because they need the cash. Lucas has this opportunity, but he has sold out in the past, and this bit of news sure makes it sound like he's not about to change.

      --
      "The only rights you have are the rights you are willing to fight for."
    4. Re:you hypocrites! by minusthink · · Score: 1

      imo, you got what you deserve for believing lucas had any artistic integrity left (or in the first place).

      --
      "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
    5. Re:you hypocrites! by virg_mattes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Sure, if I were 'NSYNC, I would try to get myself a cameo. But if I were Lucas, I would tell 'NSYNC to go F themselves.

      Your implication is that it's about money (he wants to woo the young teen girl dollars), but what if it's not that at all? What if he was really telling the truth when he told an interviewer that his daughters are big N*Sync fans and asked him to find them parts in the film? If so, then he's doing what you're bemoaning that he's not doing; namely, he's putting in something just because he can. Since both extremes (he's doing it just for money, or doing it just for personal reasons) are feasible, I'm inclined to believe that the middle ground is most likely. What probably happened is this:

      G. Lucas's daughters: "Put N*Sync in the next Star Wars!"

      G. Lucas: "Hmm, why the heck not? It couldn't hurt ticket sales."

      RING, RING

      G. Lucas: "Hey, guy, offer a cameo to the boyz in the band."

      N*Sync Agent: "Do you boyz want a cameo in AOTC? No acting and you'll all get shot early."

      N*Sync (in harmony): "Damn Straight!"


      Virg

    6. Re:you hypocrites! by undecidable · · Score: 1

      As I said, it simply looks like he's selling out again. My assumption is that is was for money, but it doesn't really matter whether it's for money, or to make his kids happy.

      The bottom line is that it certainly appears as though he is injecting something that doesn't fit into his work for non-artistic reasons.

      For all I know, Lucas was wathing MTV one day and said, "Hey, you know what would really make my movie a real work of art! An appearance by 'NSYNC! That's it! That's true to the vision of my film!"

      But somehow I doubt this.

      This issue touches on an inherent problem with movie making in general. How do you make a lot of money with a film? Not by making a film that a smaller percentage of the population will love, but by making a film that a larger percentage of the population will think is ok.

      There are very few movies that I think are great. But there is a sea of movies that I think are ok. Episode I had the potential to be great, but it was just ok thanks to his injecting croud pleasing junk. And this bit of news doesn't make it sound like I'm going to like Episode II any more than I liked Episode I.

      Who would have thought that the real dark side lie in Ewoks and Jar Jar?

      --
      "The only rights you have are the rights you are willing to fight for."
  33. Re:DAMN YOU SLASHDOT! by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is not offtopic. I even include URLS to additional sources: www.prequel-spoilers.com. they were the original ones to have it. Ananova picked it up a while back. that was when I posted it.

    --


    Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
  34. Overrated? Wow, you're a moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if you wanted to mod it down, couldn't you get a clue, and find 'redundant' in the drop down box? Nah. Too complicated.

  35. What have you done with the real George Lucas? by noizefloor · · Score: 1

    This is just wrong. Not "running a red light" wrong. "Screendoors on a submarine" wrong.

    --
    If you disagree, you're wrong.
  36. LOL-LOTR by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    I heard Peter Jackson is giving Al Gore a cameo in the Two Towers. He plays one of the Ents.

    1. Re:LOL-LOTR by telstar · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wow ... First he invents the Internet ... now he acts? How'd this guy fail to achive Presidency?

    2. Re:LOL-LOTR by tunah · · Score: 1

      Hey! No laughing at Al, or he might un-invent the internet, and /. with it!

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    3. Re:LOL-LOTR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what would be wrong with un-inventing /.?????

    4. Re:LOL-LOTR by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

      I guess that would be OK, since he's wooden, but I figured he's so stiff, he could play one of the towers!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:LOL-LOTR by Tiroth · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you would like to quote the original source? [warning-popup ad]

    6. Re:LOL-LOTR by sheldon · · Score: 2

      "How'd this guy fail to achive Presidency?"

      His father didn't help appoint 5 supreme court justices.

  37. If They are Noticable by jmallett · · Score: 1
    If they are noticable in the film (not that Lucas' mere involvement in production isn't hindering these films enough) we really need to stop EP3 for ever being made. Actually finishing tying these pieces of ass into the original film (and the subsequent ones) is sinful and disgraceful....


    George Lucas: FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP ALL OVER YOUR FACE


    Public: ZZZZZ WHAT? NOT SLEEPING

  38. Bah.. by grub · · Score: 1


    Damn you George.. You could have at least had cameos for adults.. maybe Ron Jeremey corn-holing Britney Spears

    Alas, that won't happen. We'll see Episode III with Barney or the Telletubbies..

    At least we'll still have episodes IV and V. VI? No, you can stuff the Ewochs where the sun doesn't shine too..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Bah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lucas *did* do his best to make the original 3 suck too. remember the special edition with the singing in jabba's in esb?

  39. Simpsons cameo. by Nathdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope its like the N'Sync Simpsons cameo:

    Justin Timberlake: "WORRRD!!!"

    :)

    "Yvan eht nioj" - Now that's catchy

    1. Re:Simpsons cameo. by Refrag · · Score: 1

      "OLD SCHOOL!!!"

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    2. Re:Simpsons cameo. by Zog · · Score: 1

      > ...N'Sync...
      ...
      > ...Justin Timberlake...

      We're sorry, but this kind of behavior will no longer be tolerated for a girl of your age - 13 years old, and still trying to be a geek imposter. It's simply not right, and I will not stand for it.

    3. Re:Simpsons cameo. by Stavr0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's right. They're going to sing their number one hit:
      "Idej eht nioj"

  40. Add to the confusion... by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, does this mean that along with the 35 year old virgins living in their parents' basement, there will be screaming teenage girls camped out in front of the movie theater on opening night?

    This would cause a mass confusion in the crowd as Star Wars geeks meet these strange creatures called "girls". I just wonder what happens if one of the geeks asks a teenie bopper if she wants to see his "light saber".

    1. Re:Add to the confusion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      She's in for a disappointment when she finds out it's plastic and battery powered...

      Or not...

    2. Re:Add to the confusion... by vjzuylen · · Score: 1

      So... then... technically, George is actually doing me a favor?

      Then again-- 35 year old virgin sci-fi geeks and screaming teenage girls in the same theater? I mean, just imagine the smell.

      --

      Hee-hee. Dying tickles!
    3. Re:Add to the confusion... by 11thangel · · Score: 1

      And you thought they smelled bad outside...

      --

      I am !amused.
  41. Pass the lube please CmdrTaco its starting to hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Ladies and gentleman, put our hands together for the largest ass on the Internet

    G to the izz-O, A to the izz-T, S to the izz-E

    Welcome ladies and gentlemen to the 8th wonder of the world
    The ass of the century, oh it's timeless, GOATSE!
    Thanks for clicking that link
    You coulda been anywhere on the web
    But you're here with me
    I appreciate that

    G to the izz-O, A to the izz-T, S to the izz-E

    Reading drivel on that press release 'bout VA (Linux)
    Was wondern' why they changed their names
    Dumped that dirt cheap stock, through with them
    If I worked there, I'd quit, no way I'd work for them
    Wasn't born a coder, I just make fun of em'

    G to the izz-O, A to the izz-T, S to the izz-E

    Porno for freezy keeps my hard drive so sleasy
    Can't leave Everquest alone, the game needs me
    Hex editing my name into VB progs, it ain't easy
    Slashdot wanna IP block me, I hang up and dial back in
    And somehow, I beat the lameness filter like Rocky

    G to the izz-O, A to the izz-T, S to the izz-E

    Not guilty, he who mods me down is not real to me
    Therefore he doesn't exist
    So poof... vamoose son of a bitch

    [Chorus]
    G to the izz-O, A to the izz-T, S to the izz-E
    Reading drivel on that press release 'bout VA (Linux)
    G to the izz-O, A to the izz-T, S to the izz-E
    That's the anthem get'cha damn hands up
    G to the izz-O, A to the izz-T, S to the izz-E
    Not guilty ya'll got-ta feel me
    G to the izz-O, A to the izz-T, S to the izz-E
    That's the anthem get'cha damn hands UP!

    Holla at me...
    I do this for the posters
    To let 'em know what enlarged ass look like... when they shoulda looked at that link closer
    Show 'em how to avoid a room full 'o taco snot coaxers
    Get some good trolls in before the story's over
    Posts with redirect goatse links even get modded up
    I'm dissin JonKatz for those 15-year-old boys he seems to have a crush
    Pay for premium Slashdot? You gotta be kidding us.
    If /. ain't profitable, pimp your boy whores for mo' bucks

    [Chorus]
    Yeah...
    GOATSE is back, trollin' parody of rap
    Go on, click that link, view the crater in that crack
    Like I told you sell boys, no
    JonKatz does that so hopefully you won't have to go through that
    I was raised on Windows, point and click
    if you don't like that, you can suck my dick
    Got an X10 camera, focused on my ass
    Wanna see the picture, PayPal me some cash
    Threshold under 0, why I got it so low?
    Save good trolls on my disk, watchin' all the time for more
    So you know I seen it all before
    I seen redundant on karma whores when their link post was too late
    Crapfloods and mod downs, the two things I hate
    A good troll modded up, the two things is great

    G to the izz-O, A to the izz-T, S to the izz-E

    What else can I say about Slashdot, it'll turn a man gay

    [Chorus]
    G to the izz-O, A to the izz-T, S to the izz-E
    (4x to fade out)

    The above has been brought to you by the fine folks of Frost Pist Brewery. Frost Pist Beer - Always ICE BREWED for a THICK head.

  42. This doesn't make sense... by telstar · · Score: 1

    Since when has George Lucas revealed anything about action scenes prior to the movie? I can understand him revealing (or somebody else revealing) that N'Suck is in the movie as a cameo, but Lucas has previously been ultra-tight about details such as "they die in the background within seconds". It just doesn't make sense.

    1. Re:This doesn't make sense... by noizefloor · · Score: 1

      One can only a) hope and/or b) pray that this is all some clever misinformation to throw spoilerhounds off the scent of the plot details of the upcoming ep.

      --
      If you disagree, you're wrong.
    2. Re:This doesn't make sense... by affeking · · Score: 1

      I can't recall where I saw it, but he did come out publically and say that on this one, he wasn't going to be so secretive about everything.

    3. Re:This doesn't make sense... by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Dude, it's the Clone War. For the most part, everyone already knows what happens in this movie, because 90% of it is events that were mentioned in the original trilogy. Between Obi-Wan talking about the Clone Wars and Vader's past being slowly pieced together throughout the original trilogy, the fans already know the plot of this movie in specific detail.

  43. Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by (eternal_software) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Vader - "Come, and we will rule the Empire as father and son."

    Luke - "I don't want to be a fool for you. Just another player in your game for two. You may hate me but it ain't no lie. Bye, bye, bye."

    1. Re:Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by inc0gnito · · Score: 5, Funny

      I sincerely hope you looked up those lyrics online. Beacuase no self respecting /.er would admit to actually knowing the lyrics.

    2. Re:Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe he has an annoying thing called sister who listens to that crap all day

    3. Re:Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by dimator · · Score: 1

      This might just be the smartest, wittiest comment I've ever read.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    4. Re:Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *knew* there was a reason I was wading through all those bitter geeky whiney loser /. comments.

      Quite amusing. Thanks. ;)

    5. Re:Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know those pains all too well.... I'm more than happy to go back to school later this week... at least I can only hear the n*sync when I'm walking in the halls...

    6. Re:Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by daitengu · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's scarier, the fact that you came up with this, or the fact that you know the lyrics to one of their songs....

    7. Re:Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 2

      Man, you fucked up now.. the trolls won't let go now.

      Time for a new /. account.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    8. Re:Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by SoLoatWork · · Score: 5, Funny

      How did you know they were the real lyrics?

    9. Re:Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only they could come up with dialog that witty...

    10. Re:Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by geekoid · · Score: 2

      This needs to be modded up to six!

      +1 Funniest damn post, ever.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Episode 2 - 'N Sync Style by liposuction · · Score: 0

      How did you know to ask if he knew if the other guy knew to look up the lyrics??

      Huh??

      :)

      --
      "Thoughts are more powerful than any weapon, and I don't even let my people own guns." --Joseph Stalin
  44. Re:DAMN YOU SLASHDOT! by JimE+Griff · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think people should relax about not posting first. What kind of life must you lead to get angry about someone else finding the same story you found, which you didn't even do the research for? Maybe there is a contest I don't know about for first posts, but the "DAMN YOU SLASHDOT" posts get real old. Let it slide.

    --
    Jimmy _______ | | | \__/
  45. Scooped by Metal Edge Online? by broody · · Score: 1
    --
    ~~ What's stopping you?
  46. you can't polish a turd by Dick_Fury · · Score: 1

    you could kill them 1000 times over in the movie. you could spend 45 minutes disecting their testicles while they watched, but it doesnt change the fact that NSYNC IS IN A STAR WARS MOVIE!!!! George Lucas is dead to me. I'm goin out to get some clothes without buttons or patterns, because I'm shunning him Amish style.

    1. Re:you can't polish a turd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, ask this guy, I bet he would differ with you.

    2. Re:you can't polish a turd by dead_penguin · · Score: 1

      ...you could spend 45 minutes disecting their testicles while they watched...

      what testicles???

      --

      It's only software!
  47. So what? by WickedClean · · Score: 1

    You guys all know you are still going to see the movie, even if they NSync guys break out into a song. I'd rather see them than Jar Jar. At least THEY are real people (figuratively speaking)

    --
    ...All I can say is that my life is pretty strange...
    1. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. I won't see any Lucas crap no more, ever.

  48. Hey... by stressky · · Score: 1

    At least they get blown up...Could be fun to watch :-)

    On another note, I hope you guys who are forming opinions about the movie now get the shock of your lives. Jar-jar is only in the movie very briefly, so I heard, and this movie has the potential to kick the crap out of ep 1 - if what I've read about the plot is correct. N-sync probably won't even be that much of a distracting factor, after all it's the storyline that matters.

    --
    ...this is getting out of hand
    1. Re:Hey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, dude, so what have you heard? You can't just drop a little hint like that without posting the entire damn spoiler (with appropriate spoiler warnings of course)!

      Come on! What have you heard!

    2. Re:Hey... by stressky · · Score: 1

      Just been checking out some "leaked" plotlines around the net...

      Probly all bullshit tho, you know how it goes....

      --
      ...this is getting out of hand
  49. On the plus side.... by ath0mic · · Score: 1

    sound doesn't travel in space :)

  50. Re:DAMN YOU SLASHDOT! by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    He didn't do research. he only linked to the MTV.com story. I put in links to both Ananova AND Prequel spoilers. Prequel spoilers was listed as the original source. This guy doesn't mention that. I even cracked the joke about getting to see 'nsync get blown up.

    --


    Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
  51. Lucas is just trying to impress his teenage kids by rtphokie · · Score: 1

    and tarnishing his franchise in the process.

  52. Hot grits? by Indy1 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean i have free license to pour boiling hot grits down Nsync's pants? Somehow the idea of watching them sing with scalded testicle seems amusing in some odd way.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    1. Re:Hot grits? by kiwimate · · Score: 2

      Why bother? They already sound like that anyhow.

  53. Re:DAMN YOU SLASHDOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nysnc would be perfect for stormtroopers. They could polish each other's uniforms before each shoot. ;P

  54. Soundtrack by bartyboy · · Score: 2

    Make sure to get the soundtrack with hidden track 0 where the boys hum the Star Wars theme a capella (sp).

    Seriously, I hope the Clone Edit (please let there be one) has Bye Bye Bye playing as they get killed.

  55. Lucas is the man. by Paul+E.+Loeb · · Score: 1

    As noted earlier, Star Wars films have always targeted younger generations. However stupid Jar-Jar might be, number 1 he is a CG designer's dream and number 2, kids like him. As far as NSYNC goes, it's called merchandising. Who doesn't like money? Maybe in this movie they won't even have to lip-sync.

    1. Re:Lucas is the man. by kimba · · Score: 1

      Merchandising eh... I think you're right. Exploding NSYNC dolls would be a number 1 hit.

    2. Re:Lucas is the man. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My daughter thought Jar Jar was stupid.

    3. Re:Lucas is the man. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really thinkg about it, star wars is really like porn, there are a bunch of people who try to,..how should we put it...Penetrate...eachothers..."bases" and get them good. For all of you who know what i'm talking about, and the rebels, essentially the woman, trys to hold out for as long as possible. The bad guys on the otherhand(the man)...the baddies, attack penetrate like crazy, they want to shoot their intergalatic sticky spray right in the heart of the other persons "base" and in the end, when either one of them or both of them have blown eacother up, or if the good guys cum to save the day, its over, until they try and new way to get the bad guys...(other places of the body..duh)

  56. Re:DAMN YOU SLASHDOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead of bitching post the exact links you have to ananova and prequel-spoilers and be a karma whore

  57. I would like to fall on my light sabre. by dangermen · · Score: 0

    I would like to fall on my light sabre. This is a sad day when a bunch of no-talent morons make appearances in what should be decent films. Anyone wanna bet that madonna is in the third movie? I'm sure she'd play Jaba's 2nd/3rd/4th wife or some crap like that? Or worse yet, she'll meet her twin sister, Hillary Clinton. UG!

  58. The demographic hasn't changed. by mystery_bowler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lucas has always said that Star Wars is a modern-day fairy tale. Great love stories intertwined in a universe of Good vs. Evil where the Good Guys win. It's the stuff great kiddie stories are made of.

    I mean, hey, let's look at that first triology for a second. We've got a love story between a princess and an outlaw (whose best friend, by the way, is a large, loveable hairy guy). That's classic fairy tale stuff. Then we've got the tale of a confused and tortured young man struggling to become a champion of good whilst laboring in the shadow of his evil father who, as it turns out, is still a pretty good guy himself.

    I can't tell if this is a fairy tale or a soap opera. Frankly, there isn't much difference.

    The point is, Lucas made a film that adults can - more or less - enjoy, but it's always been heavy on the childish side of things. The story and characters are easy to digest. It doesn't take a literary genius to understand that the Emporer was an evil mad man and Luke was the proverbial White Knight. The story is cut and dry.

    But I will admit that including a boy band like NSync in the movie, even for a cameo, is bowing to market influence in a major way. Oh wait...there was Jar Jar and that whole "Pod Race To Sell Toys" scene in Episode I. :)

    --

    My sigs always suck.
    1. Re:The demographic hasn't changed. by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      But.. I grew up ... well, maybe not, but I mean, I got old. And yet, to this day, I still think Empire Strikes Back kicks ass. Is there anything in the first 2 films that is anything like adding NSYNC? Disco was pretty pop in the late 70s, but I don't see the BeeGees in A New Hope.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:The demographic hasn't changed. by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      and that whole "Pod Race To Sell Toys" scene in Episode I. :)

      Hey - don't knock the pod race. It was the best part. It didn't have any acting.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    3. Re:The demographic hasn't changed. by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personal anecdote :
      In residence in university a few years ago we had an end-of-year party with some kids movies : The Princess Bride and The Dark Crystal. Everyone who had seen Princess Bride as a kid *loved* it, same with Dark Crystal - but those who hadn't seen them as children were indifferent, or downright hostile.

      I think the same applies to Star Wars. People my age who see it for the first time are 50/50 on liking it - whereas people who have seen it as children love it - it obviously has children-appeal which then translates to nostalgia-appeal. When it first came out it was worth seeing just for the effects, and gained fans that way, but I don't see how modern Star Wars movies can hope to make the same splash in the PG-13 market as the originals did.

      On the other hand, I think that "The only robot that can make beeps sound sarcastic" has far more appeal than JarJar to anyone over 8, and that Lucas should admit that while he won't neccessarily be making movie history again, he shouldn't toss our demographic aside with childrens-only appeal.

    4. Re:The demographic hasn't changed. by Detritus · · Score: 1
      Hey - don't knock the pod race. It was the best part. It didn't have any acting.

      Neither did the rest of the movie.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    5. Re:The demographic hasn't changed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But I will admit that including a boy band like NSync in the movie, even for a cameo, is bowing to market influence in a major way. Oh wait...there was Jar Jar and that whole "Pod Race To Sell Toys" scene in Episode I. :)


      Yes, because the classic trilogy had no marketing whatsoever. Kids back then didn't even want Star Wars toys. They played with rocks and they LIKED it! And everyone lived in a morally pure world, a tinkly-winkly pixie-wixie land where movies were made for free and George Lucas had to sell pencils on the street just to make enough to feed himself.

      Please. Take your blinkers off. Nothing has changed since the days of Empire Strikes Back. They were selling Lando Calrissian toothpaste and fuckin' C-3POs and all sorts of useless junk all the way through the franchise. You're just too old.

    6. Re:The demographic hasn't changed. by PolarBear3 · · Score: 1
      I beg to differ. I don't recall a part in the first 3 close to trying to get laughs from "bathroom humor." There were a few funny and cute scenes in the first 3, but no scenes similar to right before the pod race when the beast of burden - pulling the pod racer(?) - farts in the face of Jar Jar.

      Lucas should release a new version of ANH.

      ....

      C3PO: No one ever worries about beating a droid.

      Solo: That's because droid's farts don't dissolve metal and flesh faster than a light saber.

      Cut to Chewbacca raising his hands behind his head. He leans onto his left cheek and pinches out a small peep of a fart.

      Cut to closeup of Chewbacca's hips and see a small purple cloud eek out between his legs and disappate immediately. Follow movement of where the cloud should come into contact with the chess table where the chess table discolors slightly as if it were being burnt.

      C3PO to R2D2: I suggest a new strategy R2.... let the wookie win.

  59. One cameo does not make a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot has Jon Katz, but we still read it.

  60. The planet "Geonosis"?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "World of Knowledge"! Christ! How transparent can this bozo's storytelling be?

  61. Afghanistan, here I come! by sonicstorm · · Score: 1

    Sweet mother of jesus! Is the INS letting us move to Afghanistan yet?

    1. Re:Afghanistan, here I come! by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      Uh.

      The INS has no controll over where you go, you'll have no trouble getting in. Just ask John Walker.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    2. Re:Afghanistan, here I come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make a good point. Considering the 95% rule, does the good outweight the bad (or in this case, vile)?

  62. Perfect... by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

    If you are gonna have a stupid title like "Attack of the clones" you might as well have some real live clones in it.

    Lucas sold out a long time ago...

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

    1. Re:Perfect... by freakingmoron · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you think about it, the title really isn't a big deal. Yes, it sounds like a cheap B-movie title, but so do all the other episodes. A New Hope. The Empire Strikes Back. Return of the Jedi. The Phantom Menace. Attack of the Clones.

      --
      -freakingmoron- Have you ever imagined a world without hypothetical situations?
  63. Episode III - The Boy Bands Strike Back... by AcidDan · · Score: 1

    [Yoda] disturbance I sense yes...
    [NSYNC] {Tell me baby, yea...}
    [Anikin] Must resist...
    [Sidious] You cannot resist the power of the dark side...
    [Anikin] {Girl I need you baby yea}
    [Yoda] Ah Sh*t!
    [Padme] Note to self - don't let kids near dad - he's obviously full of evil...

    -- Dan =)

    1. Re:Episode III - The Boy Bands Strike Back... by irlbinky · · Score: 1

      Sort of raises the question of which is more evil - The Sith Lords or The Boy Bands??

  64. Re:LOL-LOTR, wait a minute thats not right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uh,, if Al Gore is in two towers then he would have already been in the movie as all three were shot at once, and since I have yet to an E! rumor about the appearance,(E! had a columnist there almost at all times, lucky guy:)) so that rumor is innevitably false.. Although Al Gore would make a perfect elf, he already has the pointy ears and long nose.

  65. What about Billie Dee?! by torklugnutz · · Score: 1

    Come on, like he wasn't a pop figure. And he had a pretty major part. So, who cares if N'Sync is in it. it's not like they are gonna sing. Nobody would have a problem if they were on Futurama. Give the movie a chance to suck before you criticize it.

    --
    Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
  66. Mod parent up (+1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny make me laugh

  67. Bah... by tcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lucas diserved the money he made from the 3 first star wars, in that repect, I support him in every trademark dispute, piracy attacks, and anything that might go against his master piece of work and innovation(tm).

    But one thing is for sure, he lost *ALL* my respect with Episode 1, This was clearly a "coup de cash" against his loyal fans. Not only he deceived us, it's not like if he was under-funded or he had to make tough choices (jarjar is the "living proof of poor judgment). Now, he's in it ONLY for the money, he lost his soul and his artistic taste for the movies the same way metallica lost it's artistic side for money in heavy metal music. He had all the time in the world to make a masterpiece, he had all the funding available, he had all the talent, he had enough people around him to tell him what was a good and a bad idea, I guess fans sometimes are really harsh but there's no forgiving for such blattant mistakes and misjudgement; he knew what his fans were expecting and he betted only on the CGI technical skills side (like most hollywood producers) to save the day.

    You didn't see me crying when DiVX of his mastercrap went around the net, actually it even did some good; Remember when he commented on the editor that removed *EVERY* scenes where jarjar was? that it was illegal etc etc? Well, on a moral standpoint and to defend the same Trademark that Lucas is tarnishing by himself, I think it was the best thing that the internet and p2p technology could do to save the little content of the movie that wasn't half bad. It's still illegal though, but for someone who saw it at the theatre and gave in money like I did, I would have prefered paying an extra buck to see such a version.

    At first, my thought was, maybe I was expecting too much, maybe I've lost that amazement feeling you get when you're younger and seeing something truely fantastic, but LOTR proved to me that it wasn't gone, and SWEP1 should have given me that same feeling if not better. I didn't have such a harsh judgment before seeing LOTR, but what I saw is that you CAN match a buttload of CGI, a good story and good acting and still amaze people... and that my friends, at any age.

    Having NSYNC in there just shows the commercial side of lucas that has overtaken his artistic soul. What is it going to be? Big sync dance of Yoda and all his family? oh god, I can see riverdance comming for episode 3 and have a bunch of JarJar lapdansing for 10 minutes... oh and have him signing on top of that, and oh I can see vador joining the club and using the force to lift everybody in the air and and&#*H@IkKn3,22214m3,4

    NO CARRIER

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    1. Re:Bah... by MulluskO · · Score: 5, Funny
      Having NSYNC in there just shows the commercial side of lucas that has overtaken his artistic soul. What is it going to be?


      He is more machine than man now...

      ...given in to the dark side.
      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    2. Re:Bah... by The_Messenger · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Having NSYNC in there just shows the commercial side of lucas that has overtaken his artistic soul.
      No. No. Lucas only ever cared about money. He got lucky with the early Star Wars movies, created a franchise, and now he's set for life. Howeve much you like those movies, don't think that he ever had any high, noble mission to make classic SciFi. The problem is that you saw those movies when you were an easily impressionable kid, and came to idolize Lucas early on. But he's just another greedy bastard who will do anything to increase ticket sales. He's smart... you know why he's including N'Sync, so that every preteen bitch in America will want to see it (and drag her parents along with her).

      Anyway, if you hadn't seen New Hope until you were older, it wouldn't have impressed you so much. There really isn't anything impressive or innovative about thoe three first movies, besides some of the special effects. And that was part of the plan, too, to establish ILM. Star Wars movies, like Quake games, are simply demonstrations of their respective creators (ILM and id) new toys. They make money, sure, but they make more money through licensing.

      Lucas is just another Gates, a shrewd businessman who was at the right place at the right time with the right product for sale. Sure, he's worked hard, but that doesn't make him some kind of great artist.

      --

      --
      I like to watch.

    3. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a movie. Relax.

    4. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who actually thinks Star Wars is art needs to pick their fat ass off the couch and drag it to a fucking museum or theatre or something. For christ sakes, how hard can it be to understand that these movies are money making investments designed to take in as much money as possible, not change your outlook through exposure to new expression or thought.

    5. Re:Bah... by wayne606 · · Score: 1

      Come on, nobody, even 13-year-old girls, will see SW#2 just because N'Sync is in it. The fact is that everybody in the country is going to see it because it's an Event. You have to see the movie even if you know it will suck because you know that everybody else will be talking about how much it sucked and you don't want to miss out.

      Look at it this way. You already know Jar Jar is going to be in it. If you're still planning to see it, N'Sync isn't going to deter you.

    6. Re:Bah... by halo8 · · Score: 1

      What is the DiVX name of that file? ive never been able to find it

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    7. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your analysis encapsulates my feelings exactly. I loved the first three films and was greatly disappointed by TPM. I thought maybe it was because I was getting older. So I tested that theory and sat down through the entire original trilogy on VHS recently and at no moment did I feel embarassment FOR Lucas at the quality of the dialog as I did with TPM. Sure the original had it's silly, lighter moments, but there was never any "doodoo", fart jokes,"yiipppee", or "roger-roger" that made me literally sink into my chair, shaking my head. I still got chills at the same points in the original that gave me chills when I was five. And now we come to 2002. The fact that NSynch are in Star Wars should shock me, but it doesn't. It fits perfectly with the Lucas of today.

    8. Re:Bah... by Saib0t · · Score: 1
      Did it ever occur to you that some people (like me) might have enjoyed the movie. Sure, it's not a masterpiece, but it was nice nonetheless.

      Your statement that Mr Lucas is in it only for the money now is entirely based on the fact that you didn't like the movie. You had expectations, the movie didn't meet them, well, what's the problem with that, it met other people's expectations, even if not fully.

      [quote]Lucas diserved the money he made from the 3 first star wars[unquote] and all the same, he deserves the money for the other things he makes, the games as well as the movies. Who are you to judge whether he deserves money or not? You don't like Ep. 1. Then don't go see Ep. 2.

      [quote]I didn't have such a harsh judgment before seeing LOTR...[unquote] What a weird way to judge a movie. You judge a movie on its own merits, not based on ANOTHER movie's merits. If the Fellowship Of The Ring was a great movie, it's great, but why would FOTR being great make all previous CGI movies suck. If FOTR sucked, would that have made SWEP1 being great? I'm sorry to be flamebaiting here, but you sound like the "I'm never happy" kind of person. You're just taking that as an argument to flame SWEP1 because you didn't like it. But come on, man, don't say Lucas sold his soul to the Evil Cult Of Money Above All because you didn't like it.

      All your rant about NSYNC is unjustified, read the facts before complaining, they'll make a SHORT appearance amidst a large CROWD and get KILLED SHORTLY afterwards. It's not like Lucas decided to make them the troop of "Bards" following the heroes or make them the heroes of Ep.2.

      I tell you what, make a movie and make it better than Ep.1 and we'll talk about it later on because I'm getting tired of the mindless Lucas bashers. You didn't like it, fine, you liked it, like I did, fine too but you have no unalienable right to judge Lucas' work?

      --

      One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
    9. Re:Bah... by LegendLength · · Score: 1

      Well said.

    10. Re:Bah... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Make it better than Ep1?

      ho ho ho ho!

      Check out TheForce.net and view some of the home-brewed films. They're in quicktime, but free for download. I shit you not when I say that I enjoyed some of the 15-25 minute shorts they had on there than I enjoyed SW:Ep1! I even watched one or two of the shorts a couple times, they were so well done. Better acting, plot, story, and a less flamboiant integration of CGI and reality. All that, and with the only budgets being people's own financial donations. Now shut your mouth, you uninformed n00b, before I have to slap you.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    11. Re:Bah... by Watts+Martin · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Actually, The Phantom Menace was much closer to Lucas's original script ideas for Star Wars, one he drastically reworked at the urging of friends who told him, essentially, that for anyone to give a crap about the story it needed to be archetypal: a sci-fi incarnation of myths and legends. Lucas found the works of Joseph Campbell and used The Hero With a Thousand Faces as a virtual blueprint for the reworking of the script, morphing the tale he'd come up with about the young boy Anakin into a tale about the young man Luke Skywalker, changing the rather passive kidnapped princess--also nearly pre-teen--into a feistier adult, and stripping the convoluted Dune for Dummies politics down into a straightforward tale of good and evil.

      And it worked, despite the fact that Lucas isn't a good writer. (He said so himself, long ago around the time of American Graffiti.) The script for Star Wars still isn't really very good. Watch the movie trying to be an objective bastard instead of a long-time fan and you'll see what I mean: most of the dialogue is pretty stilted, and even the direction is somewhat dubious--great visuals, to be sure, but the relatively inexperienced actors clearly weren't being given a lot of support from the man behind the camera. But what the movie had was, as Campbell would put it, "the power of myth"--and it had special effects and action sequences like none ever seen before. When Lucas first showed a private test screening to his friends, most of them thought it was terrible. The one who didn't? Steven Spielberg, who said, "This movie is going to go on to make a hundred million dollars."

      And, lest people think I'm slamming Lucas a little too much, keep in mind that he neither wrote nor directed The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi; he only came up with the general stories. (He didn't even write the Star Wars novel that bears his name; it was actually ghost-written by Alan Dean Foster.) Almost everyone I know, including myself, thinks Empire was the best of the set--and I suspect that was largely due to Leigh Brackett's script. Almost everyone also seems to think Jedi was the weakest of the set--and I'd argue the things that drove most people nuts, from Luke and Leia being sisters to the insufferable Ewoks, were sadly part of Lucas's original story.

      But at least then he still had the power of the first one propelling things forward. Now, George Lucas has become... George Lucas. Evidently he'd decided years ago that his original concept was background for the "new" story of Star Wars, and now he had the confidence to make it--because he knew that audiences had grown up with his mythology, and they'd flock to see his new work.

      Lucas isn't selling out--he's becoming egotistical. He was part of a group before, not one lone visionary--what genius there was in Star Wars was a collective genius. Now we're getting pure, unadulterated Lucas. p.And the sad thing is, he's right: people will keep flocking to see it.

    12. Re:Bah... by Cyberllama · · Score: 2

      I have no idea why everyone sees fit to moan and whine about episode 1 every chance they get. Other than a few bits of dialog which seemed more geared towards the children in the audience (mostly from the mouth of JarJar Binks), the movie was pretty decent. The story was good, the directing was good, the acting was mostly good. I don't know what kind of astronomical expecations you guys must have had, but get over it already. Maybe some of you just realized how stupid it was to camp out all night for what would inevietably be (no matter how good) just another movie. . .

    13. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Almost everyone I know, including myself, thinks Empire was the best of the set--and I suspect that was largely due to Leigh Brackett's script...were sadly part of Lucas's original story.

      So, in summary, everything bad about Star Wars must automatically be the direct work of George Lucas, and everything good about it must be the work of someone else. Very well-reasoned.

      Not having the hard-on for Empire that the rest of the fans seem to, I think all the Star Wars movies are full of unbelievable, cheesy dialogue, straight-up good versus evil, and time-worn cliches posing as story, but show me the space opera that isn't. Just one will do. Any one. Please.

      I think Star Wars is a batch of space-cowboy B-movies. All this Power of Myth business is hooey and always has been, and I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Lucas named Episode II Attack of the Clones just to bring people down to earth and remind them what kind of movie they're watching -- a Saturday-afternoon popcorn movie.

    14. Re:Bah... by Katharine · · Score: 1

      I don't know why everyone is so upset about 'N Sync being in the movie. They are not going to affect my enjoyment of the film (or lack thereof!) in the slightest amount for one simple reason: I wouldn't recognize any of those guys if they sat down on top of my desk and blocked my access to my keyboard. How are they going to be like any other extras in the movie? It's not like they are going to sing or anything.

      And if the movie is as bad as it looks like it might be, I just won't bother seeing it-- I'll go see something else instead.

    15. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2001.

    16. Re:Bah... by glastonbur · · Score: 1

      Luke and Leia being sisters

      Really? Luke's a girl? I didn't know that...

    17. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Lucas were creating these films for his own private screening in his home, I would agree that one one has the right to judge. But he's making them for public consumption, therefore he opens them up to criticism. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. It all comes down to matter of taste. Some people think poo-poo is funny (wonder if Howard Stern was a ghoster writer on TPM), some ask for a little more out of their 8 bucks.

  68. Why settle... by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

    for just one of those options. I think that he could handle all of them. Too bad Darth Maul was the one cut in half. I kept hoping through E1 that Jar Jar was goona get a light sabre up the wazoo.

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

    1. Re:Why settle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      darth maul appeared in the lucas arts game dark forces 2 : jedi knight as the boss at the end of one of the levels. he was cut in half and very much alive, he moved around with a hoverthingy where his legs should be, like the robots in the black hole movie did.

  69. Good idea. by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 1

    Being the good little karma-whore i'm not, HERE is the Ananova story (all the way back from december 31st!), and Here is Prequel spoilers. they were the original source, and the story is on the front page.

    --


    Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
    1. Re:Good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a new thread i meant

  70. How can you tell... by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

    the difference between those boy bands? I thought it was the same band that had just gone through a bunch of name changes.

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  71. nooo! by dscowboy · · Score: 1

    Sigh. George Lucas you talentless, skirt-wearing valley girl. I hope you have an accident in a meat processing factory so everyone can see you're actually a robot, built to replace the real Lucas when he died in 1984.

  72. Re:Umm, right. And Mark Hamill was from where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he redeemed himself by all those great roles after Star Wars, too.

  73. Target demographic by MouseR · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think the target demographic for these films has changed a little since the original trilogy.

    A New Hope didn't have a target demographic. Not at 600k budget.

    The Empire Strikes Back tried the late teens target demographics. It didn't gross out as much as they had anticipated at the time. It caught on later in time.

    The Return Of The Jedi targeted kids and up, in attempt to widen the audience. By that time, episode 5 had become a classic, and it caught on.

    That's the "magic" formula that was used for episode 1, and don't expect anything for the next two episodes.

  74. Merchandising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't take a lot to get the younger male crowd all hopped up on a story like Star Wars.

    But the younger female crowd? Well if they throw in a bit of N'Sync, all is well. Even if they only appear for a few seconds, Lucas will still probably make bank on the merchandising from action figures featuring N'Sync members posing 0.5 seconds before they are blown to pieces.

  75. Re:Umm, right. And Mark Hamill was from where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, hello, moderators? Is there a reason why this post doesn't at least have an "interesting" applied to it? I don't exactly see CmdrTaco pointing this stuff out.

  76. Iroooonnnny, Irony by jayfoo2 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    There is some delicious irony to having members of a boy band in a movie called 'Attack of the Clones' don't you think?

  77. Target Audience by gartogg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't understand why people are so upset by this new fact. We were told before episode 1 that the new trilogy would be for Lucas's kids. I understood when people were amazed that the first episode was aimed at such a young target audience, but now that we were told, how can anyone really think that the movies won't be aimed at CHILDREN.

    This new travesty is a horrible perversion of what should be a beautiful thing, but at least it's in charachter. He told us what he wanted to do. He's doing it. Quit complaining that "the target demographic for these films has changed a little since the original trilogy," because at this point, you shouldn't expect anything less from the producer of Episode 1.

    --
    I'm a concientious .sig objector.
    1. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parts started to hurt when I read this. No, really. Are you trying to say that I'm getting old? Sigh.

  78. Grammar Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word "titled" should be replaced with the word "entitled."

    1. Re:Grammar Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you're a British snob. Take your jellybabies and go home. Leave us Yanks alone!

  79. Hahaha. by The_Messenger · · Score: 0
    I hear that they'll only be lip-syncing their lines, but the lightsaber choreography should be wonderful.

    Premier night is going to be interesting. Thirteen-year-old girl: "Daddy, why does that big fat bearded man smell so bad? And why is he making robot noises?" Father: "It's just a fanboy, honey, try not to make eye contact and kick him in the balls if he tries to talk to you during the show."

    --

    --
    I like to watch.

  80. Yep, his kids named it and picked the cast. by doublem · · Score: 3, Funny

    From The Sun

    "The boys got involved because producer GEORGE LUCAS's 13-year-old daughter Katie is a fan of the band and badgered her dad to give them a role."

    Man, I wish MY dad would let me name movies and pick the cast!

    This Summer, from Metro Home Video: Christina Ricci and Janeane Garofalo in "Hotter than Natalie with twice the hot grits"

    www.matthewmiller.net

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  81. Is lucas off his rocker? by FeanorOfTheNoldo · · Score: 1

    The first prequel was pretty bad in comparison to the original trilogy, but after hearing this and seeing the preview for episode 2, i'm really disappointed. The actor they chose to play anakin in the movie looks completely wrong for the part to me, and from what I saw of his acting, I would say that I've seen cardboard boxes put more emotion into an act.

  82. according to the sun article by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2, Funny

    All five members of the group appear in a battle scene in Episode II: Attack Of The Clones.
    But unfortunately for fans they are all bumped off within seconds by savage androids.


    Well, I'd pay just to see that part! Sell out? More like savior! He knows what WE want to see!

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  83. Boycott by 6EQUJ5 · · Score: 2


    It's time to organize for a planned flop. No more Star Wars. This crap is ruining my image of the ORIGINAL movies. No more t-shirts, no more action figures, no more posters.

    None, nada, nil!

    --

    1. Re:Boycott by termite666 · · Score: 1

      No more Natalie Portman jokes on /.
      The only down side as I see it.

    2. Re:Boycott by clontzman · · Score: 2

      Er... that's really open minded. Why don't you go see the movie if you want to, or don't go see it if you don't want to?

      Why does everything on /. have to become some kind of political crusade where everything is either genius or drek?

      It'll probably be a decent movie, but it probably won't live up to your expectations. It'll probably be better than some movies you've seen and worse than others. It's a movie, deal with it.

      "Organize a planned flop"? Pleeeeze. Organize it with yourself.

    3. Re:Boycott by Random+Man · · Score: 1

      Ruining your image of the original movies?

      When was the last time you actually watched Return of the Jedi? Picture this touching scene between Han and Lando before the big battle:

      HAN: Look. I want you to take her. I mean it. Take her. You need all the help you can get. She's the fastest ship in the fleet.

      LANDO: All right, old buddy. You know, I know what she means to you. I'll take good care of her. She-she won't get a scratch. All right?

      HAN (looks at him warmly): Right. I got your promise now. Not a scratch.

      LANDO: Look, would you get going, you pirate.

      The sound you hear is the audience retching at some of the worst acting ever. I remain an Original Trilogy Fan, but let's face it, many parts of the ROTJ were awful. Best were the scenes on Tatooine and with the Emperor.

      The acting in TPM was overall better (still with clunkers: "You think it's this...boy?"), but Lucas really let everyone down with the stupidity of his story and his stereotyping. The Force can be detected with a tricorder count of your mitochondria? Vader can pick up Luke's force from his Tie Fighter but Qui-Gon can walk right past Anakin and not feel a thing? Jedi like Qui-Gon regularly use their Force Powers to try to cheat Jewish junk merchants? Chinese trade officials? Rastafarian natives? Darth Maul - don't make me laugh. With no character development at all he was just a (tough) wandering monster.

      Go to LOTR and feel the silence as the AOTC trailer plays. As the Emperor said: "Now you pay the price for your lack of vision."

  84. I LOVE N-SYNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i am fat pimpled-face gay linux geek

    i love n-sync

    LOVE YOU

    LOVE YOU

    LOVE YOU

  85. why by mkmiller · · Score: 0

    I guess we all know what kind of pr0n Lucas downloads.

  86. That's it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it! George Lucas is *definitely* gay.

    Always suspected it with that funky hairdo, but now it's confirmed! Next thing you know we'll find out Obi-wan is secretly a cross-dresser.

  87. Lucas didn't sell out by schnitzi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lucas didn't sell out... NSYNC did.

    It used to be about the music, man!

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  88. I'm sure its accurate too.. by Rombuu · · Score: 1

    I mean, remember how great Kenneth Branagh was as young Obi-Wan in Episode I? And that appearance by Han Solo's father? And Charles Bronson as a Jedi? Or any of the hundereds of other rumors about the last movie that were a bunch of crap...

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
  89. a dirty joke by infinitey · · Score: 1

    Maybe they will change their mind and have Britney Spears cameo... with a lightsaber!

    I bet ole' Lucas would like that. :-)

  90. Yeah, but the trailer I saw was REALLY GOOD. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --The one dealing with the budding romance between Anakin and the Queen. And the frustration of youth.

    That trailer actually gave me shivers in ways that NOTHING about the previous film was even remotely able.

    To be honest, I have high hopes for this film. --We might actually see some good messages. How passion of any type can lead to the dark side. And, anyway, there's nothing quite like a good romance story when it's well told.

    Weird about the boy-band members having cameos, although I'd venture to guess that this is a sly attempt to capture the female viewership fully and completely. Interesting ploy.

    We'll have to see. I do sort of worry, though, that the new film might serve primarily to reinforce certain messed up societal ideals, a la "Titanic". --Including, of course, that the perfect boyfriend must now die of hypothermia in the North Atlantic in order to be properly acceptable to a girl.

    Ah well. We'll just have to see, won't we.

    Fingers crossed!


    --Fantastic Lad

    1. Re:Yeah, but the trailer I saw was REALLY GOOD. by hyperizer · · Score: 1

      That trailer actually gave me shivers in ways that NOTHING about the previous film was even remotely able.

      It gave me shivers because Lucas doesn't have a good track record for filming believable romance. Look at the creepy Luke/Leia flirting in Ep. IV and V or the weird exchanges between the 14-yr. old Queen and 9-yr. old Anakin in Ep. I, for example... And when the Queen exclaims "My Anny, you've grown!" in the preview, I could sense a million voices crying out in pain, only to be suddenly silenced.

    2. Re:Yeah, but the trailer I saw was REALLY GOOD. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      It gave me shivers because Lucas doesn't have a good track record for filming believable romance. Look at the creepy Luke/Leia flirting in Ep. IV and V or the weird exchanges between the 14-yr. old Queen and 9-yr. old Anakin in Ep. I, for example... And when the Queen exclaims "My Anny, you've grown!" in the preview, I could sense a million voices crying out in pain, only to be suddenly silenced.

      [Laughs]

      Yeah. I know what you're saying. It is very hit and miss with Lucas when it comes to romance. About half the Young Indies dealing with relationships were absolutely terrible, (Indy and Mata Hari. (penned by Lucas and Carrie Fisher, incidentally. -A bad sign, possibly.) --And that strange episode in Istanbul with Indy's fiance.)

      But then there were some Young Indies which were absolutely charming. (As a young boy with the (same-aged) pricess Sophie of Vienna in 1908). And that amazing episode with Elizabeth and the many-languages scene in 1916.

      I've not given up hope just yet. (Though, I do have a creepy feeling that trailer makers might sometimes be more talented than film makers. . .)

      Hm. It just struck me that some /.ers might be the sorts who still think that love stories are "Yucky".

      Hm. Well, like I said, I've not given up hope just yet.


      -Fantastic Lad

    3. Re:Yeah, but the trailer I saw was REALLY GOOD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, in that trailer, in one of the bedroom scenes, Natalie Portman is wearing this little black number... *I* got petrified!

  91. Attack of the Clones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They ought to call it "Attack of the money grubbing Jews"

  92. Nsync in Starwars EP2 by loconet · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well what do you know they actually do look cute with the Jedi customs...

    --
    [alk]
  93. Missing Story by Gregg+Alan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Star Wars we all remember was mostly about telling the story. It was captivating and definently interesting. Sure, there was a bit of 'side story', but the movies were always about the end theme. (If you don't know, well, too bad).

    The new movies don't seem focused on the story line. I mean, what have pod racers to do with Vaders character developement? Anyone see him race pods later in life? No? No duh.

    Including the droids was a mistake. Later in life, did the just forget to mention what they knew about Vader? Duh. Lame.

    It should come as no surprise that the next movie is a rental. If you go to the theater, don't complain here. IT WILL SUCK!

    You have been warned.

    --
    Here before all but 8486 of you.
    1. Re:Missing Story by dvicci · · Score: 1

      Anyone see him race pods later in life? No? No duh.

      I did many things as a young boy that I no longer do now. This, Vader's apparent injuries and the fact that he was just a tad busy eradicating the Jedi and doing the Emperor's bidding make this an unconvincing argument.

      Later in life, did the [sic] just forget to mention what they knew about Vader?

      Hmmm... erase selective bits of their memory banks, perhaps, so that they don't know? They are computers, after all...

      --
      ] D
    2. Re:Missing Story by canadian_right · · Score: 1
      The pod race was cool to watch.

      Vader was the best pilot in the Galaxy and the pod race 'foreshadows' this talent.

      Just in case you haven't noticed, Stars Wars is pretty much a kids series of films - not Shakespear.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    3. Re:Missing Story by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      It was stated from the beginning that all nine planned movies (The last three will never be made) would feature the robots, and that they were central to the story, the only characters that persisted through all nine films.

      Did it ever occur to you that their memories might be erased at some point? Or that R2D2 didn't make the connection between that little boy and Darth Vader, for whatever reason? I do agree it was a mistake to show vader as the creator of C3PO. But hey. As long as his memory gets erased SOMEWHERE along the line, it won't be a glaring continuity problem.

      And the pod race was the way that little aniken was able to win his freedom (and the parts for the ship), so it did serve a purpose to the plot. But this is one aspect where the movie should have taken the extra 15 minutes and been more like the book.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    4. Re:Missing Story by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      The new movies don't seem focused on the story line. I mean, what have pod racers to do with Vaders character developement? Anyone see him race pods later in life? No? No duh.

      I disagree. The pod race showed off his extreme driving abilities (remember "no other human has the reflexes to pod race"). Later on he does the same type of thing in the plane he gets caught in. You may not see him in a pod later on, but you sure as hell see him in a TIE fighter.

      Including the droids was a mistake. Later in life, did the just forget to mention what they knew about Vader?

      Assuming they don't have their memories reprogrammed between now and then, what would they divulge exactly?

      It should come as no surprise that the next movie is a rental. If you go to the theater, don't complain here. IT WILL SUCK!

      Am I on slashdot or AICN?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    5. Re:Missing Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched Star Wars for the cool aliens, lightsabers, laser guns, and spaceship battles. That's the Star Wars I remember fondly, and the Star Wars I still love. If you don't get that, well, too bad.

    6. Re:Missing Story by KillboyPHD · · Score: 1

      "The new movies don't seem focused on the story line. I mean, what have pod racers to do with Vaders character developement? Anyone see him race pods later in life? No? No duh."

      No, but Luke is told that his father, like himself, was an exceptional pilot.

      --
      Bah weep granah, weep ninny bong!
    7. Re:Missing Story by praedor · · Score: 2

      No. This point shouldn't have come up with a 5 year old child at the helm. Totally unbelievable no matter how you apologize for this.


      Anakin as a TEENAGER doing this would be believable, but NOT (I repeat, NOT!) as a diaper-wearing infant. This was merely a kiss-ass move by Lucas to those who play with Tickle-me Elmo dolls and watch Barney, plain and simple.


      This part of the story was simply for flash and dash, which isn't a problem, but it SHOULD have been in the NEXT episode rather than the first where the child still likely pooped his little pants and sucked his wittle fum.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    8. Re:Missing Story by praedor · · Score: 2

      You didn't drive cars, or RACE CARS - and CERTAINLY not in a life-or-death match. Children are rightfully removed from homes and placed in foster care for less agregious mistreatments and recklessness on the part of parents.


      You may have done some "crazy" crap on your tricycle and bicycle when you were as young as Anakin was in Ep 1 - and such is believable and likely no matter what sort of wunderkind you have. The GREATEST wunderkind is STILL emotionally undeveloped and uncoordinated as per the NORMAL/AVERAGE of his/her age group.


      Don't apologize or try to defend the use of a toddler in an adult situation (or teen situation at worst). The pod race shouldn't have occurred with Anakin until he was AT LEAST 13 or 14 at the earliest to allow for SOME believability (even in a fantasy, believability is important).

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  94. Fake title? by Hacktress · · Score: 1

    Lucas messed with everyones heads by originally telling everyone that "Return of the Jedi" was called "Blue Harvest. I'm still harboring the fierce hope that "Attack of the Clones" and the NSYNC thing is a joke too. There could be a chance, though it wouldn't be too smart considering how many potential viewers he's losing. One can hope though....

    --


    - yezzz, my name is a joke.
    1. Re:Fake title? by spack · · Score: 1

      Are you smoking crack? If so, share please. The title is real. The trailers released, etc. Where have you been?

      --
      For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the sheltered will never know.
    2. Re:Fake title? by Hacktress · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your incredibly useful response. How do you know for sure that it's real? Everyone thought "Blue Harvest" was real, too. I could be wrong, I said that. And if I did have any crack, you couldn't have any anyway.

      --


      - yezzz, my name is a joke.
  95. Target Demographic: Lovelorn Teenage Girls by Digitalia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I saw an EP2 trailer at Lord of the Rings and it was enough to make me want to reach across the aisle and throttle someone. The only people in the theatre at the time who even enjoyed the trailer were the teenage girls, and the collective simper was horrifying. I can understand modifying the Star Wars we've all known and loved to sell it to the modern demographic, since 20 years does tend to demand certain variations in the theme to capture the interests of the same target. Yet the wholesale bastardization of a concept to attempt to make it appeal to all demographics is a work of marketry and not artistry. It's a damned foolish thing to do and a sign that Lucas has become nothing more than a sellout.

    I'd been rallying for another Indiana Jones movie for a few years now. This is the moment when I stop. As much respect as I have for the past accomplishments of Lucas and Co., I couldn't possibly tolerate the desecration of another franchise.

    --
    Pax Digitalia
    1. Re:Target Demographic: Lovelorn Teenage Girls by hughk · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Um, these girls made the Titanic. If those girls come back and rewatch the movie, then it is going to make some serious money. However, did you see the famous "Breathing" trailer? That was much better and showed a lot more action.

      LOTR:FOTR has some modifications to widen the audience, but that was just to give a little more female identification. However, it is generating a lot of people who want to see it again who are far from being either traditional movie goers (teens) or LOTR fans. You don't have to bend over just to get a large fan-base if the starting material is good. The film wasn't even that expensive to make (if you divide the total budget by 3)

      Please could someone explain this to Mr. Lucas.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    2. Re:Target Demographic: Lovelorn Teenage Girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I saw an EP2 trailer at Lord of the Rings and it was enough to make me want to reach across the aisle and throttle someone. The only people in the theatre at the time who even enjoyed the trailer were the teenage girls, and the collective simper was horrifying.

      Yeah, speaking of simpering. I am so fed up with the constant whining and sanctimonious nostalgia of so-called Star Wars fans, that anything that will piss them off as a group is fine by me.

      Bring on the teenage girls. At least they might go in expecting to enjoy themselves, instead of mentally cataloguing the flaws for posting on Slashdot later.

      Yeah, it's all about the money now (not like before!), and there's all this merchandising (not like before!) and there's bad acting and dialogue and witless stories (not like before!) and your poor defenseless childhood is being trampled upon.

      Congratulations. You cracked the case. Put down the action figures and go pick up a copy of Adbusters. Then write them a letter telling them they're hypocrites for charging money for their magazine.

  96. Asked? Or begged? by prototype · · Score: 1

    "The MTV article says that NSYNC asked for the part; an article in a UK tabloid says Lucas asked them."

    I read this a few days ago that the members of N'Sync were friends with Lucas' daughter and they they kept begging her for a part. Lucas' finally gave in but apparently they're only in the scene for a few seconds until they get blasted by battle droids.

    liB

  97. I'm with the "big deal" crowd on this one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh, who cares if they're in a scene with extras? They do this all the time in hollywood....look at "Life of Brian". Most people don't know that George Harrison is an extra in that. (And the only reason I know that is it was mentioned in a story after Harrison died, along with the film clip).

    Now, I'm not comparing 'nsync to harrison by any means, but I bet most 'nsync non-fans (of which I'm one) wouldn't even be able to tell which scene they were in once the movie comes out.

    1. Re:I'm with the "big deal" crowd on this one.... by blane.bramble · · Score: 1

      Except of course, George Harrison financed "Life of Brian", so he was actually involved with the making of the film.

  98. Re:Overrated? Wow, you're a moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that the moderation score of that post has changed, you sound like a moron...

  99. How about a new title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like "Attack of the Oven Mits"?

    and the 3rd installment...
    "Star Wars 3:The Toe Jam Rebellion"

    and the 7th installment...
    "Star Wars 7:The Fellowship of the Force"

  100. Yep he sold out alright by Kasmiur · · Score: 1

    this proves it
    "The boys got involved because producer GEORGE LUCAS's 13-year-old daughter Katie is a fan of the band and badgered her dad to give them a role.
    "

    He sold out to his daughter. How dare he!!!

    --
    -THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
    1. Re:Yep he sold out alright by WannaBeGeekGirl · · Score: 1

      Sold out implies that he did it for money. Since when does he need the money? Regardless of whether or not the movie makes any money, he's got enough money to make hundreds more, so I don't think "sold out" is quite the right terminology.

      --
      ~WBGG~ "And I'm so sad like a good book I can't put this Day Back a sorta fairytale with you" ~Tori Amos
  101. Demographic Change? by Un1v4c · · Score: 2, Redundant


    um...I was about 12 or 13 when I first saw Star Wars.
    I don't think the demographic has changed, in fact, I think its still the same.

    --

    I gave myself to Jesus, but now he never calls
  102. I'd like to see NSYNC... by sigwinch · · Score: 2
    ...naked and petrified. In carbonite. Here's hoping they don't survive the freezing process.

    While Lucas is at it, Natalie Portman could use some petrification.

    --

    --
    Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

  103. Well, now we know what George... by rxs · · Score: 1

    Lucas can say to his fan(atic) base... "Bye, bye, bye..."

    --



    ---
    I could've sworn I disabled .sig viewing. . .
  104. just can't do it by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

    I was going to do the geek thing and at least see it on video. I can't now. Lucas has gone off the deep end. He's lost touch with his core. oh well.

    The king is dead. long live the king. pete jackson.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  105. star wars��� by elite+lamer · · Score: 1

    i hear in episode three, the climax of the movie takes place on the planet Pepsi. pull your pants up, george lucas(TM)

    --
    Oops!
  106. Too bad... by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2
    Too bad Bea Arthur wasn't available to do a torch-song in the cantina. Also a pity that Jefferson Airplane isn't around, or we could have them do a number.

    Proof positive that if Lucas has too much creative control over his movies, he'll screw them up big time. The movies he does get creative control over get all sorts of weird midgets, furry creatures, or fart jokes.

  107. This movie was ruined long before NSTINK by termite666 · · Score: 1

    Being here at Presidio of SF .Where Lucas is building his latest tourist trap aka( Letterman Digital studios) I find it hard to respect George Lucas combine that with Jar-jar and I can safely say that I wont waste my time on this movie .
    The ONLY saving factor is Natalie Portman -ummmm
    hot grits!!!!!

  108. Funny... by thesolo · · Score: 1

    I sent in this exact story earlier today, and it was rejected in under 1 minute.

    2002-01-02 23:15:00 'NSYNC to appear in "Attack of the Clones" (articles,news) (rejected)

    I was always curious as to why near identical stories get rejected, and others make the cut. Either way, I don't think my submission was even read, as I refreshed about 30 seconds after submission, and it was already rejected.

    1. Re:Funny... by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 1

      Not only was my story rejected (I submitted it days ago), but I got modded down for complaining. I feel your pain.

      --


      Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
  109. Why I won't be seeing AotC in the cinemas by Kris_J · · Score: 2
    Product placement and crap titles aside, the real reason I won't be seeing the movie in the cinemas is that the cinemas themselves suck. How have I been screwed, let me count the ways;
    • Little green fire-fly like dots right through Mimic, plus an obvious cut/break/repair in the film.
    • Cyclic digital distortion of the sound right through Hollow Man.
    • Given wrong tickets and pointed to wrong theatre for Thir13en Ghosts (movie titles are no longer on cinema doors). Mistake not noticed until 15 minutes after correct movie started.
    • Purchased discount pack of "Cinema Cash" only to find that the expiry date had been shortened to six months and for one of those months a normal ticket was cheaper.
    • Projector setup incorrectly such that subtitles at the beginning of Replacement Killers were cut off so completely that the audience didn't notice there were any until one spanning two lines half-popped up.
    • Waiting in theatre for The Mummy Returns to start and Tomb Raider begins -- this time I was in the right theatre.
    That's all I can remember for now, but I'd say a good 60% of the movies I've seen in the last year or two have been screwed up by the cinema. If only the movies were actually good enough to be worth coping with the crap.
    1. Re:Why I won't be seeing AotC in the cinemas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoah, that's pretty bad, the worst that's happened to me was the audio in Thin Red Line was up a little too much, and that was at a Regal theater.

      Whenever I go to the movies, I almost always go an AMC theater. They have the biggest, cleanest theaters, the best service, and the seats are way more comfy than any other theaters I've been in (and the armrests fold up, good for dates).

    2. Re:Why I won't be seeing AotC in the cinemas by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      Go to a better Cinema?

    3. Re:Why I won't be seeing AotC in the cinemas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know your problem, you're only seeing crappy movies.

  110. Whats next? N'Binks? by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 5, Funny



    This is so profoundly retarded that I'm having trouble, for one in my life, expressing my true feelings.

    So, I called up the NIST and asked them to create a unit of measurement that accurately describes the ratio between retarded things and lame things. I proposed that 1.0 would be the standard ratio for something that would be equally retarded and lame, and suggested Episode II, George Lucas, and N'Sync might be good benchmarks from which to gauge this new standard. They agreed, with one stipulation. They wanted to put "mebi" on it somewhere, because there was a sale on "mebi"s this week..They overestimated public demand for them and had a whole bunch lying around they needed to get rid of.

    Without further adue, Star Wars's ratio of lameness to retardedness will be measured in Mebijarjars, and more specifically, Episode II will be exactly 1.0 Mebijarjars if N'Sync happens to be in it. Ten bucks says Episode III will feature nothing but chimpanzee actors wearing garbage can lids on their heads beepy-boopy sounds dubbed over a laugh track supplied by the surviving members of Menudo.

    Cheers, its meant to make you laugh,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Whats next? N'Binks? by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

      I love you.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    2. Re:Whats next? N'Binks? by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Menudo, have you ever considered putting the old "story of Propaganda" back up?

    3. Re:Whats next? N'Binks? by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2

      I wish I could. Much of the original storyline was nuked by everyones favorite company, VA Linux Systems, before I had a chance to archive it and move it off.

      Remember, kids. VA Resear...uhh...VA Lin..no.. VA Software Corporation loves you, and Bowie is crazy.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    4. Re:Whats next? N'Binks? by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      I have the story archived at home. I'm on vacation at the moment, but I can send you what I have. Several people here on /. have asked for somebody to put it up.

      If you wish, reply and we can move it over next week.

  111. 2 words by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

    You rock!

    (PS- sounds like me and my younger sis when we were kids :) )

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  112. Mod the above post up! by twilight30 · · Score: 1
    Unfortunately (or otherwise?) Lucas has said that the prequels will be the end for him.

    And not a moment too soon, at this rate.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
  113. LOTR rocked?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "LOTR rocked"? Heh...I deleted the pirated version of "Bored of the Rings", unwatched, from my hard drive. That makes two movies I have deleted, unwatched (the other one was "Tombraider". Can a movie make one say, "I don't fucking care" any stronger?

    Another pirated movie made me asleep half way through (and consequently, I deleted it without watching the entire thing) was "Harry Potter".

    But I bet you fucking faggot geeks loved all three of these flicks. Thank goodness I didn't have to pay a dime for them. :-D

    1. Re:LOTR rocked?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, watch the homophobic bigotry, you jerk.

    2. Re:LOTR rocked?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, it would appear I have offended a flaming faggot. I offer up my schlong to your waiting mouth in an attempt to reconcile.

  114. Great Cinema STAR WARS by Agamous+Child · · Score: 2
    &ltrant&gt

    I sometimes get bewildered that people try to equate the star wars movies or storyline with anything resembling great cinema.... George Lucas and Co. are intent on creating.. err.. recreating mythology and plotlines that are universal.. when you hear that word.. universal, you should run.. the stories and character development take a back seat to effects and gimmicks.

    Was I the only one who thought that Episode 4 (IV) sucked? At the time, it was amazing effects and a well thought out story, but the acting was sub-par at best, and the directing and cinematography were atrocious... Carrie Fisher (Remember Princess Leia??? - She wrote an Oscar winning film, Postcards from the edge, it got some sort of Oscar) - Her take on Lucas's Directing Skills - his range of direction was from "Faster!" to "More!".

    Of course I am a fan, of course I had all the action figures, I was 8 years old. But that doesn't mean it was good... It was a good attempt.

    When I hear people talking about the SW movies as a "franchise" or with some sort of reverence, I laugh out loud.. it was trash, and Episode one was trash. My wife bought me the DVD for Episode one, and I can't sit through it again, I either fall asleep because everyone has a stick up their butt and they are saying their lines as if they were reading them from cue-cards, or I get so disgusted with the shitty plot and the contrived gimmicks (R2-D2 owned by Anakin, C3PO built by Anakin? give me an EFFFING break!) and the inconsistancies with the original ethos... If you are going to make up the laws of a made-up universe, don't change them because it fits with the story... Don't even get me started about the Gungans.. Jar-Jar actually wasn't that bad, but can anyone explain to me why the Jedi didn't just go to the city first? what was with the 20 minute ride through the planet core?

    Send in the Clowns is going to suck too, but I will buy my ticket like a good fan boy and sit and cheer when he gets the girl, and when the bad guys die, and when he becomes darth vader...

    &lt/rant&gt

    --
    I had a sig, but /. ate it. My Web Site
  115. Re:Overrated? Wow, you're a moron. by Latent+IT · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey, great. Another bullshit AC with mod points to spend. You know what? It's a good thing I don't give a damn about karma. If you can mismod, then post as AC to gloat about it, it shows two things:

    1) You don't give a damn or care how the mod system is supposed to work, nor care about the fact that you're showing your general opinion to be worthless. After all, who in their right mind would care what an obvious asshole thinks?

    2) You have an ego driven personality, where exerting even the slightest, most imaginary power over someone, no matter how far removed from reality, really gets your dick pumping. Being ego driven is self defeatist. I highly recommend reading Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. It could change your life for the better.

    Oh yeah. AC's who think griping about me being modded down, please don't defend me. It usually flushes my karma as far as possible. ;p

  116. Demographics... by Lictor · · Score: 1

    Anyone see the movie "Titanic"? Anyone remember how well it did at the box office?

    To paraphrase: "Do not be to proud of this technological terror you've constructed... it is insignificant next to the power of the '13-year-old-girl' demographic".

  117. In light of the demographic change... by Rayonic · · Score: 1

    Maybe Slashdot shouldn't do any more stories on the new Star Wars movies. After all, this is "News for Nerds", not "News for Teeny-boppers". Can we think of any other traditionally geek things that have 'sold out' recently?

  118. Perfect TimeStamp function by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just add a cheezy boy band.

  119. Star Wars: The Date Flick by EDinWestLA · · Score: 1

    With all the serious romance slant the trailer gave out, you'd think ol George was trying to work it as some sort of Titanic in space. Then again, look how much jack that movie rolled in.

    Guess N'Sync can serenade the ppl jumping into lifeboats...erm, pods as some star cruiser that got in the way of some battle disintegrates.

    1. Re:Star Wars: The Date Flick by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 1

      Or you can just watch the TIEtanic parody.

      --


      Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
  120. also know as... by chip_s_ahoy · · Score: 1

    In space...no one can hear you scream.

  121. A suggestion: by Robber+Baron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How about making a mod pack for something like Quake that lets you do the fragging yourself?

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  122. it's not that bad.... by xeeno · · Score: 1

    Wasn't mc hammer in the first one?

  123. Episode IV by caambrose1985 · · Score: 0

    It would appear that Episode IV was rather aptly named.

  124. Has the demographic _really_ changed? by newbob · · Score: 1
    > I think the target demographic for these films has changed a little since the original trilogy

    I don't think so, I just think that we've gotten older. When I first say Episode III, back in 1977, (I think), I was 15 years old. Isn't that the audience that N*SYNC appeals to? I guess it could be a few years younger than that.

    1. Re:Has the demographic _really_ changed? by Bazz · · Score: 0

      > When I first say Episode III, back in 1977, (I think), I was 15 years old. Isn't that the audience that N*SYNC appeals to?

      Thats fine, but I don't recall the Bee Gees, Bay City Rollers or Abba appearing in Ep III, do you?

      Its become clear that ol' George has finally lost it - did he really direct Ep 3?? The SW series began falling apart when the Ewoks showed up. Bring back Kersh asap!

  125. n'sync suck balls by aphreal · · Score: 1

    n'sync are fscking clown shoes!! and so the movie will also be fscking clown shoes, as well! and that's all i want to say about that topic.

  126. The Movie Industry by pizen · · Score: 2

    Please remember that Lucas works in the movie INDUSTRY. That means he is trying to make money. I do believe he's doing a damn good job of it. I've been sitting here reading everyone's comments and I've come to the conclusion that most readers of this article have forgotten that Lucas isn't making movies for you. He isn't making Star Wars so that the 35 year old guys still living with their parents get a thril from his "epic" film. There is a definite difference between a film and a movie. A film tends to be more artistic and usually is trying to convey a message (a perfect example is Copola's Apocalypse Now). Movies, on the other hand, are here to entertain us and to make money. Star Wars is a series of movies. If you want something epic with real meaning why don't you go read a book. I'm sick of whiny fanboys bitching about what Lucas is doing to their "precious" Star Wars. If you don't like it then you don't have to go watch it. No one is forcing you. When you create a movie franchise and make millions of dollars you can do whatever the hell you want. But last I checked most /. readers probably don't own the rights to successful movie franchises. This reminds me of a story (that I heard on 60 Minutes the other night) about when Richard Harris went to Jack Warner to voice a complaint about Warner making his movie version of Camelot more sexy than was originally intened. Warner took Harris to the front of the studio and asked him what it said on the sign. Harris said "Warner Brothers". Jack said, "Right. And until it says 'Harris Brothers' you'll do what I say." Ok, I've said my piece. Mod me down if you want but I had to get this off my chest.

    1. Re:The Movie Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What are you rambling on about? Nobody is challenging Lucas' right to make his films as crappy as he pleases. Obviously, we are equally free to call them as we see them, and to spread the word far and wide.

  127. Holy shit, get a grip by bryan1945 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um, some guy makes a couple of films you like a lot. A while later he makes some more films that you don't like very much.

    At what point in this story do you figure at all? Don't bother saying anything about giving him your money, 'cause that was your choice. You don't want, you don't buy. Maybe if he came to your house and pointed a gun at your head to buy the DVD...

    Why does Lucas have some kind of "commitment" to you, rather than say Tom Clancy or Michael Chrichton (sp?)? They all produce a product, yet where is the outrage that Timeline made obsolutely zero sense?! (Ok read, but bugger the science!)

    "He's making the films for his kids! Burn him!" What, making a film for a bunch of whiny ass-monkeys would be a better choice? Sure, they are the luckiest kids on the planet, but still, I can't think of many motivations better than doing something for you kids.

    If you don't like what he's doing, sure complain about how it could be better (I sure did), but don't get so excited about how "he owes us more" or "it doesn't match my vision" or "a dog could do it better". He doesn't owe you jack and if you think you can do better, go prove it.

    End of long, dumb rant, but I'm kinda sick of people bitching like Star Wars was their exclusive birthright.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    1. Re:Holy shit, get a grip by gnovos · · Score: 2

      For me, it's bad becuase it terribly insulting. It basically conjures up the picture of George sitting in a black leather chair stroking a white cat muttering in a bad French accent,

      "O? Jou vant to know how stupeeed *I* zink ze American people are? I vil show you..."

      It's insulting every single time a marketroid thinks that people are literally nothing but pavlovian dogs who will salivate at the ring of a bell. ESPECIALLY considering the more "intelligent" demographic that enjoyed the original SW. I had planned on at least checking it out, but frankly, I am insulted now. I won't watch it even on video. Perhaps I will "pirate" it just so that Lucasfilm will lose the not-going-to-happen-but-pretend-it-would-have sale, but that's as far as I'd go.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    2. Re:Holy shit, get a grip by RembrandtX · · Score: 1
      ESPECIALLY considering the more "intelligent" demographic that enjoyed the original SW

      you are referring to the same people at the EPI premiere who were wearing jedi clothes, carrying plastic rainbow lightsabres, and throwing around plastic beachballs as the credits were playing ?

      The Original Demographic who saw SW were 12 year old kids.

      The only sad thing, is that the 12 year old kids at the EPI premiere were all 35ish.

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    3. Re:Holy shit, get a grip by kindbud · · Score: 2

      It's insulting every single time a marketroid thinks that people are literally nothing but pavlovian dogs who will salivate at the ring of a bell.

      But most people are, and do.

      ESPECIALLY considering the more "intelligent" demographic that enjoyed the original SW.

      Uhhh... see my .sig...

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    4. Re:Holy shit, get a grip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >He doesn't owe you jack and if you think you can do better, go prove it.


      Actually, jackass, somebody has.


      And has.


      Either of the above two rewrites are worlds away from anything Lucas could do these days. Or you.

  128. Lucas hasn't sold out by dawnsnow · · Score: 1

    Not that I like NSync, but some celebrities as cameo in starwars is not so bad idea. You probably remember ET and other characters in EP1. It was kinda good.

    Well.. the problem is casting. Lucas definately has some problem with casting. He should hire someone to do it.

    BTW, I haven't heard any exciting news on slashdot lately... What's going on here..

    1. Re:Lucas hasn't sold out by skotte · · Score: 1

      what's the one thing star wars has always been good at? better than any other theatrical conveyance?

      MERCHANDISING!!

      george lucas has always fFaithfully created toys fFor every stupid minor character in the fFilm in stunning detail. there's dozens of ewoks, fFor example. droids that appear fFor a second or two have a piece of merchandising behind them.

      so. N*Sync wanted to be a set of toys. so what do they do? they call their agent, and their agent calls george lucas.

      Lucas sees an opportnity to attract shit-loads of adoring fFans of the fFemale persuasion (a demographic which is always lacking in the star wars audience).

      everyone gets what they want.

      even the geeks who want to see N*Sync get blown up.

    2. Re:Lucas hasn't sold out by a+random+streaker · · Score: 1

      For episode #1, he didn't care how much the movie earned -- that was small potatoes. He had already lined up over two billion dollars worth of merchandising agreements. The movie could have had zero viewers and he'd still be 1.9 million ahead of the game. (Of course, that would cut into episode 2's marketing deals quite a bit...)

      --
      "All representatives are busy. The estimated hold time is one..hundred..sixty..four..minutes." Detroit Edison, 02/01/02
    3. Re:Lucas hasn't sold out by yesthatguy · · Score: 2

      what's the one thing star wars has always been good at? better than any other theatrical conveyance?

      MERCHANDISING!!


      One movie has done better, if only within the the movie itself...

      Spaceballs! Yogurt knows everything about moichendising. Comeon, when was the last time you saw a StarWars themed flame thrower?

      --
      Yes! That guy!
    4. Re:Lucas hasn't sold out by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Despite being hilarious, that was one of the movie's more biting digs at Star Wars and George. Of course, being Mel Brooks, it came off good-natured anyway.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  129. This reminds me of Highlander... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

    Loved the first, was crushed by the next, never bothered with the third.

    Boy bands getting pasted... well its a good start. Maybee they could toss that Crusher kid from that other space show and let the bots (slowly) work him over too...

  130. My only question is... by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Is this gonna devalue my Empire Strikes Back poster that's signed by Lucas. I have a sinking feeling that it will. Shit.

  131. N*SYNC!!! *Giggle* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOW I can go to see the movie with ALL of my BEST friends. Except LISA -- who's now my EX-BEST FRIEND because she told Jason I liked him. Which I DON'T. But even if I DID she shouldn't tell him. Plus she's stuck up and a whore and besides she stuffs.

    gtg

    SWAK :)

    Teri

  132. that explains it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thinning of the herd...

  133. Lucas.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is obviously suffering from some form of writer's block. That, or the man's just burnt out.

    Look at the title.. Attack of the Clones? It sounds like something that would follow the words, "Tonight, on Fox.."

    That aside, should we be surprised that there's characters such as Jar Jar Binks, and now the NSYNC people are going to be in the films?

    No.

    Star Wars has always appealed to pop culture.

    That he'd consider putting a pop .. I can't figure out the term. Band usually denotes those who create and play music. Artist tends to denote the same, at least musically. ..marionettes? That's about all they are, singing the lyrics of others, and dancing the moves of some guy with goofy hair.

    Anyway, it shouldn't come as a surprise that he'd consider giving them parts. Star Wars = Pop Culture.

    Sorry to burst the bubbles of everyone here, but Star Wars != Geeks and Outcasts.

  134. Isn't it kinda hard to sell out..... by Chas · · Score: 1

    .....when you were never anything but a wholly owned, pre-fab boy-band to begin with?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  135. The damage done... by Cplus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The damage done by having a boy band or any recognizable figure in a movie based around a universe, as Star Wars is, is that recognizing them draws you out of that universe and back into the real world. This would be true whether the reaction you have toward the person is negative or positive. As an example, I found it quite bothersome to see the "E.T.'s" in the Senate scene of Ep 1. I liked ET as a child, but it took my mind out of the Star Wars plane that it was dwelling in at the time.

    --
    "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
    1. Re:The damage done... by jeff13 · · Score: 1

      You are so right. This HAS to be a silly rumour. No director still sober would make such an obvious mistake. It's a death shot, as they say. The movie would come to a halt right at the real world thing, whatever that is. Certainly, evil little corporate boy toys would achieve that!

      BTW, Lord of the Rings is brilliant! FRODO LIVES!

    2. Re:The damage done... by Tom+Veil · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. While "Manhunt" wasn't exactly the creme de la creme of Star Trek: The Next Generation, it shows how a cameo can be done effectively. Mick Fleetwood (of "Fleetwood Mac") appeared under heavy makeup with few lines, and even those were somewhat garbled. We can't assume anything about how the Ep. 2 cameo will be done. Maybe the 'actors' will be background aliens. Maybe they'll be so heavily costumed so as to be unrecognizable. I'm sure they won't look anything like they do when they 'play' their 'songs'. And with different hair and wardrobe, and probably no more than one or two lines, what self respecting /.er would even be able to tell it was them?

      Even Lucas knows the rule of the cameo fairly well. How many people really caught the Enterprise-D's cameo in Ep. 1 before it was pointed out to them? How many have caught it now? In any case, with Lucas' stilted directing, I don't think a few stilted, unrecognizable extras are going to make any difference.

      On the other hand, if you'd like to think more positively: If the man can make muppets seem real, surely he can make puppets seem real. ;)

      --

      There's nothing you have that they can't take away: Absolute zero, Gentle Jack, bottom line.

  136. plus ca change ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can remember, between episodes IV and V, seeing an article about how KISS were going to be in episode VII (or IX, or whatever). They were to play a 4-headed creature-thingy.

    'NSHIT or not, though, i think these films have gone to shit since VI. i saw the trailer for II the other night; turned to my friend and said "looks like purple rain, with robots".

  137. To Quote Frodo.... by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO!!!!

    insert random stuff here to defeat the rassum-fassum-mumble-grumble lameness filter...

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:To Quote Frodo.... by Maledictus · · Score: 1

      Or the exchange:

      "Are you frightened?"

      "Yes."

      "Not nearly frightened enough."

      --
      Consigned to flames of woe.
  138. Well duh by smaughster · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It only makes sense to add NSYNC to this movie. It's called "Attack of the Clones", and we all know that boy bands are cloned of each other, so why not?

    --
    I intend to live forever, so far so good.
  139. People seem to be forgetting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...IN THE BACKGROUND.

    Sheesh, grow up. You guys all make it sound like there's going to be some big fuss about it. Hell, 99%+ of you won't even notice it when you watch the damn flick, even when you're LOOKING for them.

    They're extras, and not only will you not hear them, you'll probably barely get more than a few frames of SEEING them as it is.

    But if you want to all bitch about it like "Lucas fucking sucks, that sellout now makes movies for KIDS" or "goddamn, films are not pop culture" should just grow the hell up.

    Besides, if you were N'Sync (or any other boy band), wouldn't YOU fight like hell to just have a walk-on in any Star Wars movie? Oh wait, I forgot. This is slashdot, and its practically a requirement to be biased against anything that isn't free or open source...

    1. Re:People seem to be forgetting... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2
      But if you want to all bitch about it like "Lucas fucking sucks, that sellout now makes movies for KIDS" or "goddamn, films are not pop culture" should just grow the hell up.

      There are 4 kinds of people in the world:

      Optimists(Idealists)

      Radicals

      Realists

      Opportunists.

      Everyone is born an Optimist, the world is of endless possibilities - coming to doubt otherwise makes you a Radical or a Realist.

      A Radical is someone who sees significant underlying problems with the present system and realize that the 'problems' others see are really symptoms of deeper more accepted truisms, these 'otherwise accepted truisms' are in fact flawed, this person questions those and most view them as "Radicals".

      A Realist is someone who accepts that problems exist, they cannot change them, and set out to live as best they can with a situation outside of their control.

      Opportunists are those who broker the transition from Opportunist to Radical/Realist and gather personal power in the transition. These people are business people and politicians.

      Now, my point: Your comment to "grow up" really says "lower your standards and accept the world as it is presented by others -- and shut up". Some of us choose to be more active in demanding high standards of culture. We expect people to make films not products. I loath the idea of a world consumed by masturbatory pap like Nsync and the movies you would have Lucas make. Generally the first 3 SW films were regarded much higher than the last (first) one. Most were disappointed (myself included) - is it wrong to wish that those who create popular art (film in this case) not be requested to make something of value? Value with regard to the art, not some bastards pocket book.

      For the record, Im a radical. I understand that my sense of idealism is being assaulted all the time - your comment is particularly offensive, if you want to accept less than what humanity is capable of -- do so -- but dont try to win any converts because you choose to be immoral and lazy.

  140. NSYNC Blows Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that they've taken over planet Earth, 'NSYNC are prepared to blow up in a galaxy far, far away.

    Now that is something I'd pay to see.

  141. An Open Letter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Dear Mr Lucas:

    When you made the original "Star Wars" movie- now known collectively as "A New Hope", your team was forced to create a motion picture here on earth. I remember watching (as a child) "The Making Of Star Wars", which showed the then young- not yet existing(?) ILM create all of the scenes we love and admire... using carefully sculpted models and stop motion photography. You were all on the cutting edge.

    Repeat that story for the two movies that followed...

    Then, a few years ago, you re-released those three movies with "added visuals"... claiming that THIS was the correct vision of Star Wars... the technology was absent when you created the movies- and in the end, you ruined them. You claimed it was because you were never happy with them...
    That's not why you re-released the movies...

    The reason you bastardized your own artwork was the same reason you marketed The Phantom Menance to a decidedly YOUNGER crowd than A New Hope- and it's the same reason that you have decided to "cast" a tennie bopper's dream-boy band as Jedi Knights in your upcoming film.

    money


    Shame on you, George.
    Shame on you.

  142. But what the Slashdotters really want to know is.. by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    ...will it be petrified?

  143. Fuck Me, Fuck My Goat. by Michael+Goatfucker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Have I told you the story of how I like to go to my Aunt Sally's farm and anally rape her goats? The best part is sucking my own cum from the goat's ass. The mix of salty-wad and hay-filled shit makes my tongue quiver with glee.

    --
    My Name Is Michael Sims
    I fuck goats
    I'm a left-wing pinko
    I'll mod you down
  144. Ain't nothing but a clone attack. by RageMachine · · Score: 1

    "Ain't nothing but a clone attack."
    "I like nothing better than to be killed that way."

    (Backup Singers): "killed that way" "smashed that way"

    --

    --------------------------
    Is this a sig?
    --------------------------
  145. It seems like a teen movie by Yuioup · · Score: 1

    I saw the trailer in the cinema about a week ago. My impression of Episode II is that it's a sort of teen road movie or something. It kinda reminded me of American Grafitti. I think George Lucas is trying to get posters of Episode II hanging on teen girl's bedroom walls. He's just playing the marketing machine again.

    Yuioup

  146. While they're at it... by Alsee · · Score: 2

    They could give Britteny Spears a role as an alien too. They'd only have to add a little more rubber.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:While they're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, spoken like a traditionally jealous, flat cheasted, pimple faced, unattractive, or other wise type of whinny frump using women empowerment as an excuse to look attrocious and act smart while being jealous of women who are both or the other.

      *groan*

    2. Re:While they're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, spoken like a traditionally jealous ... using women empowerment as an excuse

      No, I'm a guy who finds butchering a body and inserting globs of rubber / sacks of water distateful. I like natural breasts. Big, small, fine by me.

      As far as women's empowerment, I support her right to do it. I just think it's stupid and and I find it very unappealing.

      I also think she set herself up as a target for this kind of humor when she tried to deny it. That was pretty funny :)

      P.S. I'm posting as AC to match your post's zero score. No point bothering people with this post if they can't see yours. Hmmm, that's what slashdot needs - an option to post at 0 or even -1 without going AC.

  147. He hasn't sold out -- yet... by Ringthane · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not unless he has one of the Hutt holding the boy band members on leashes while they wear the male version of the bronze bikini Carrie Fisher wore for the slavering Jabba the Hutt in Return of the Jedi...

    Star Whores is more like it. Feh.

    --
    Friends help you move... Real friends help you move bodies...
  148. Can't you all see what Lucas is going for? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

    He obviously wants Oscar for Best Title!

    (And perhaps Best Original Song (By 'NSYNC))

    :)

  149. Is anyone still going? by $beirdo · · Score: 1

    Is anyone out there still going to go see this one? I'm not!

  150. Blamo by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    N'Synch shows up at which time Samuel L cuts loose with his light saber and gives further reason for a shrine devoted to his bad ass.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    1. Re:Blamo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if he says something horribly religious and ghetto at the same time... something about avenging the geeks and those with taste...

  151. I submitted this to /. 3 hours earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...
    Didn't even include any badmothing of the boy band, just the facts jack.
    Thanks for the date-breaking speed michael.

  152. I'm sick of seeing this stupid argument! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Jesus, I know there will always be some idiot somewhere who thinks it's a very clever observation when he points out to us that no one is physically forcing us to buy a movie ticket, or something like it.

    Sure, Lucas is breaking no law in becoming a total whore and letting some marketing committe script his movies. In the same way, a politician breaks no laws if he sells out his principles and does exactly what some tobacco company tells him to do. Breaking a trust which is not backed up by a contract is something anyone technically has a right to do. And just like no one is forcing you to buy any specific movie ticket, no one forces you to re-elect the backstabbing politician. Does that make this sort of behavior is alright?

    Lucas, like some corporate-tool-politician, has shat on the heads of the very people who made him what he is. But it's worse than that in his case. You see, only Lucas can legally make the remaining movies in the Star Wars epic because he owns every last bit of Star Wars IP. There are plenty of directors out there who would be willing and able to finish the series well. Unfortunately, their doing so would be illegal. If LOTR had been made badly, I could have tried to make it again, though better. The future Star Wars movies will be made badly, but we have no recourse. We just have to take it, even if they're opportunistic, poll-driven, stroryless product placement ads (which they will be).

    The Lucas of today makes me feel dirty for ever having liked Star Wars and for having spent every cent of my childhood allowance on those overpriced action figures. I imagine some people who voted for Nixon felt betrayed in the same way. Fine... I was a tool, a means to an end for some greedy bastard in whom I once had faith. Excuse me if I'm a little mad about that, but maybe being indignant about this sort of thing is a necessary part of self-respect.

    1. Re:I'm sick of seeing this stupid argument! by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      The original poster is right and you're wrong. I really hope that you're not serious comparing film directors and politicians. Lucas hasn't shat on anyones head. Anything he's done recently hasn't diminished what he's done before, it's called freedom, he can make whatever sort of film he wants and he doesn't owe you squat. If you don't like his new films don't watch them, pretend they don't exist. If you think you can make a better film then please do so.

    2. Re:I'm sick of seeing this stupid argument! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So giving all your childhood cash to Lucas in return for some plastic toys was fine, but his letting some boyband members be extras makes you feel dirty?

    3. Re:I'm sick of seeing this stupid argument! by bradasch · · Score: 1

      Lemmme see... What are we talking about, really? Oh, I remember. A MOVIE.

      So, if Episode 2 is not a good movie, you're going to pull all your hair out? Be depressed and try to kill yourself?

      And, your comparison with politics... is that serious? If it is, then yes, you deserve the "backstabbing politician".

      Let me make another metaphor (sp?). Suppose you're a (insert your favorite baseball team here) fan. Well, last season they were champions, and you were happy. This season, they are second place. Are they shitting on your head? How come a wonderful team who was champion last season not be champion again? You deserve better! You went to the games! You bought pop-corn, expensive official t-shirts, caps, etc! They are making you "feel dirty" for liking them so much in the past.

      Please. It's JUST a science fiction movie. Get a life.

    4. Re:I'm sick of seeing this stupid argument! by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      a politician breaks no laws if he sells out his principles and does exactly what some tobacco company tells him to do.

      Wow, wait a second. YES IT IS illegal for politicans to take orders (through threat or bribe) from anyone. They, at virtually all levels, accept an oath to think of duty and be principled.

      To suggest that the two are similar is ridiculous. In one case we have a market$whore the other we have a traitor who should be jailed. Lucas is as responsible for making pap for the masses as are those who buy it (no im not a 'libertarian-vote-with-your-dollars' free-market droid). But please, dont cheapen the crime comitted by American Plutocrats by suggesting that the same illogical 'market forces' (and their indisputable trught) somehow make crooked politicans acceptable - please, doing so only steadies their evil course.

    5. Re:I'm sick of seeing this stupid argument! by JennyWL · · Score: 1

      In the same way, a politician breaks no laws if he sells out his principles and does exactly what some tobacco company tells him to do. Breaking a trust which is not backed up by a contract is something anyone technically has a right to do.

      Actually, the politician in your example IS breaking a law and can be removed from office for it: he could be recalled by the voters or booted out by his peers in the House or Senate. And there are other forms of trust which are backed up by law even when there is no contract. Parents can be prosecuted for failing to provide adequate care and support for their children. Caretakers for the elderly or incompetent can be sued for breach of trust if they plunder assets instead of providing care. Public employees (including members of the armed services, and your politician) swear oaths to uphold the laws, and those oaths are considered binding. Society is bound by customs as well as by contracts, and law enforces them both, so there is NO right to do whatever the hell you please as long as you haven't signed a contract that limits your actions.

    6. Re:I'm sick of seeing this stupid argument! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
      "Actually, the politician in your example IS breaking a law and can be removed from office for it"

      Wrong. It is not illegal for a politician to follow word for word the instructions of some company, or for that matter, of an advisor, or their dad. It is wrong for them to accept bribes, but I said nothing about that. You don't have to take bribes to sell out. (Of course, Lucas might be, but for him it's not illegal.)

      But your second point about the legal obligation without an explicit contract is a good one. I wasn't thinking about cases like parent relationships. I do think you overstate the case when you say the law enforces custom. Rather, I think the law treats certain relationships as tacitly contractual. About public-service oaths: they contain very little concrete content; in the US, you basically swear you will perform your duties to the best of your ability, and not act to overthrow the country. That does not legally preclude that you follow verbatim the advice of your spouse or some lobbyist who "convinced" you in some legal way.

    7. Re:I'm sick of seeing this stupid argument! by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      Just so you know, I wasn't trying to be clever or anything, I just don't get this "betrayed" feeling that many people seem to have. Am I disappointed? Sure! Am I less than happy with Ep1? Definently! Do I still have a shitload of original SW toys from my childhood sitting (or most likely melting) in my parents attic? Yup. But I refuse to feel like a "tool", because that would mean that somehow I was used and abused by something I enjoyed as a kid.

      I also fail to see the comparison of watching SW and voting for Nixon. People vote for a politician on specific promises and stances that they take, whereas Lucas made a piece of entertainment with no implied promises what-so-ever.

      Also, I don't believe that any other director could automatically finish the serious better than Lucas. Maybe they could, maybe it would be Rocky 5. As for the greedy bastard part- it's a business, just like any other, and everyone likes to make money. I would assume that if I called you a greedy bastard for wanting to get paid for work that you did for me that you would be a bit upset?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  153. So he wants to make more money, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man!! Forget outaSYNC, If he had ANY brains, he would've chosen Britney Spears to appear in SW2! :-) She could be the Manager of a Burlesque House on a Far away planet, where she has a one night stand with a very sexually active 20-something Anakin SkyWalker! Then we can blame Britney for Bringing him to the Dark Side. It's Perfect! If Georgy-boy wants to make money, then I want Britney. Screw lipSYNC.

    P.S. It just ain't what it is used to be. Everything changes.

    P.P.S. I am a fan of SW, why can't I have Cameo? Huh? Huh? Why?!?! sniff, sniff.

  154. Couldn't care less .. by bogomipe · · Score: 1

    .. since I wouldn't recognise any of them anyway unless they had the name of the band written on their t-shirts.

    --
    - mipe -
    1. Re:Couldn't care less .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right...

      Revenge of the Clowns...

  155. Does it sound like Starwars? by Dexter77 · · Score: 1

    "Attack of the killer robots" - Starring new hot teenage pop stars!!!

  156. Slashdot demographics vs Star Wars target audience by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 3
    OK, after episode 1, no one can pretend that Star Wars has basically turned into children's entertainment. And I don't mean like Anime, where adults can still get a lot out of it; I mean like Dumbo and Tigger.

    Since we've established that the movie's target audience misses the Slashdot demographics by a mile, maybe it would be good judgement on the part of /. editors to not make a major story out of every stupid Star Wars rumor. They should seriously consider treating it the franchise more like they Dumbo and Barney (with a nostalgic and heavy heart for what the Star Wars prequels could have been). Slashdot is full of former Star Wars fans. With enough /. hype, there will surely be hundreds of readers who pay Lucas for a seat "just to see how bad it really is." And we don't owe him that. We may owe him a bit of ridicule, but more than that, we owe him some indifference. Since the commentators here seem to agree, I hope the editors are wise enough to show some restraint. "Star Wars sucks now" is no longer "News for Nerds."

  157. Ugly typo in the first line (sorry--it's late!) by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2

    "OK, after episode 1, no one can pretend that Star Wars hasn't basically turned into children's entertainment."

  158. jeeesuz kryst by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    HOLY SHIT - tell me it aint true please - id rather see Britney Spears the queers puhleeeez

  159. Re:Great Cinema STAR WARS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone have an idea why the Jedis can not free Anakin's mother from slavery. Is it against Jedi ethics?

    You can save the universe but you can not free a slave, bah!

  160. here's a thought... by skotte · · Score: 1

    what's the one thing star wars has always been good at? better than any other theatrical conveyance?

    MERCHANDISING!!

    george lucas has always fFaithfully created every stupid minor character in the fFilm in stunning detail. there's dozens of ewoks, fFor example. droids that appear fFor a second or two have a piece of merchandising behind them.

    so. N*Sync wanted to be a set of toys. so what do they do? they call their agent, and their agent calls george lucas.

    Lucas sees an opportnity to attract shit-loads of adoring fFans of the fFemale persuasion (a demographic which is always lacking in the star wars audience).

    everyone gets what they want.

    even the geeks who want to see N*Sync get blown up.

  161. It's for K I D S ! by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

    I think the target demographic for these films has changed a little since the original trilogy.

    Do you think so?

    I saw the original when I was nine years old, and I thought it was fantastic. My dad was in his 30's and I think he enjoyed watching it with me, but he did not get obsessed, and go out and spend loads of money on plastic figures, chat with all his mates about it all the time, and spend all night queuing for tickets for The Empire Strikes Back.

    I am now in my 30s, if I had a nine year old son, I would take him to see Attack of the Clones, and enjoy watching it with him. It's not the target demographic that has changed. People have grown up..

    S T A R W A R S I S F O R K I D S ! ! ! !.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    1. Re:It's for K I D S ! by geekoid · · Score: 2

      StarWars ep4 was NOT FOR KIDS!
      sheesh. it was for adults. I remember the hyps, the acadamy awards, the adults all talking about it. I was 12 when it came out, I remember more adults in line then kids. I remeber adults takng there kids to driveens to watch it while there kids slept.
      I know of nodody who saw this movie multiple time in the theater.I'm sure some did, but none of my friends or there kids did, all of whom are SW fans.
      Yes Lucas managed to market the action figures, but they caught on far faster then anybody expeted. The Kid factor was a huge surprise, which began to have a serious impact on what goes in the movie buy ep6. i.e ewoks.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  162. another frightening possibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just wondering if they get to do part of the soundtrack as well?

    scary ...

  163. LOTR rocked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So people actually liked it in the US? When I saw it people in the cinema were laughing out loud at the ending because it was such a bad film - I really felt ripped off. I wasn't aware it got great ratings in the US, did it really?

    1. Re:LOTR rocked? by sjehay · · Score: 1

      Hmm... well, I'm in the UK, but I liked it and so did pretty much everyone I've spoken to who's seen it (I haven't read the book though...) What did you think was so bad about it?

      As for the ending - admittedly the last line ("I'm really glad you're here, Sam" or similar) was a little cheesy but some people like that sort of thing... it couldn't've had a big, dramatic ending because there's still another 2 books/films to get through before you're allowed that. I'd just be interested to see what you disliked about it...

    2. Re:LOTR rocked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was hardly Amélie or Ghost World tho, was it?

    3. Re:LOTR rocked? by sjehay · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't know - I haven't seen either of them, I'm afraid...

    4. Re:LOTR rocked? by darthmoolah · · Score: 1

      The line was close to (but not exactly) the line in the ending of the book. Jackson really tried to stay faithful to the story and the nature of the characters as written. He could have gone for the "big ending" but stayed true to Tolkein's vision in this and many other small details.

  164. The demographic HAS changed. by krmt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lucas is, quite simply, out of touch with his own vision. No one argues that Star Wars is a fairy tale, and a damn good one at that. But look at what makes good fairy tales! Harry Potter is a prime example of a modern day fairy tale that has won the hearts of millions of fanatics of ALL AGES, much the way Star Wars did years ago. Toy Story is another example, where everyone loves it, kids and adults. LOTR is doing it in theaters right this very moment, some half century after its original writing.

    The fact is, Lucas did something once upon a time that was magic by creating something for people of all ages to love. You can't really say that about the new movies, something is missing. I think what's missing is both in Lucas and everyone else.

    The target demographic of the original movies was not really children, but everyone. Kids don't understand the concept of a Republic vs. an Empire and what that means, or the sexual tension between Han and Leia. That stuff is in there for adults too. And don't forget the violence (which is present in all fairy tales by the way, pick up the Grimms if you don't believe me) which is relatively absent from episode 1. No dead gungans lying around, they're too fucking marketable! Even the Ewoks were slaughtered en masse. These "adult" concepts are things that are very real, that reach out to us and touch us from inside and connect us to the story long after the fantasy has faded away. Harry Potter does this. LOTR does this. Why not episode 1?

    I wish I had an answer to these questions, but the fact is that Lucas is simply not targeting his demographic anymore. When he made the first movie, his priority was simply getting it made because he couldn't worry about anything else. Make the movie, and people will come. His demographic was the project itself. Now his demographic is what he thinks audiences will want from him, and he's bending things to this vision. He's not serving the story anymore, he's trying to serve us all, and in doing so he's cheating everyone of something that should have been great.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    1. Re:The demographic HAS changed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Even the Ewoks were slaughtered en masse"

      if i remember correctly, only one or two ewoks die, the rest just run away or operate clever little traps that destroy poorly designed robotic war machines, or armored soldiers with a complete lack of peripheral vision

    2. Re:The demographic HAS changed. by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah..

      "Sorry Princess, I don't have time for anything else"

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  165. last three by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    actualy, for some reason I found an interview Lucas did while making Return of the Jedi, in which he claimed that that film would be the last starwars film he made. If only he'd kept his word...

    Who knows, if lucas is still around 20 years from now and decides he wants another few billion dolars...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  166. Droid droppings. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's the marketDROID who thought this one up.

  167. Re:Umm, right. And Mark Hamill was from where? by krmt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What the hell is this troll? You're saying because Lucas signed an unknown actor for his low budget unknown science fiction film in the late 70's, that having what is right now the world's largest, most visible, and most marketable band show up in what is likely the most visible franchise film series the past decades is even comparable?

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  168. The reason why... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    I've heard the reason for this particular Jedi cameo is that Mr Lucas' daughter like N Sync... They'll probably also just be seen in a split second in the movie in that giant Jedi battle. I also heard they'll get killed pretty soon. :)

    So don't worry, you'll most likely not even notice them being in the film.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  169. Rated 4K by Alehandro · · Score: 1

    Rated 4K (for kids only) No people over 16!.
    The first SW sucks. But after I saw the trailer. I think the new one will be worst.!!

  170. Doesn't matter by nagora · · Score: 2
    If films like Titanic and LotR can get the sort of takings they have with their lousy scripts then frankly Lucas could make the entire film about Jar-Jar and his family going to an N'Sync concert and people would claim it was the greatest film ever made.

    Cinema as anything other than elongated MTV is dead; marketing to kids is all that matters.

    I went to see LotR on New Years Day and it stunk - badly written, very badly directed, with ZERO characterisation. Yet kids in the cinema were applauding at the end. People on /. rave about it and the IMDB has it as the best film of all time. Why? Because it had very good special effects.

    So, keep all your crap about Lucas selling out, he's only going where the audience are leading.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:Doesn't matter by Jorrit · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen it myself yet (I will in a few days) but most reviews that I have read (and most of them were from professional reviewers) considered the film very good just BECAUSE the characters where very well done and the film was VERY well directed. So your view seems to conflict with the view of many reviewers?

      Greetings,

      --
      Project Manager of Crystal Space (http://www.crystalspace3d.org). Support CS at http://tinyurl.com/cb3x4
    2. Re:Doesn't matter by vjzuylen · · Score: 1

      Same here; I've yet to see it, but just about the only comment I've heard levelled at LotR is that Ian McKellen pretty much out-acts everyone else on the screen. Other than that, many (professional, respected, established) critics in my country are billing it as one of the top movies of 2001.

      Hey Nagora, are you sure you didn't accidentally walk in to a rerun of Dungeon & Dragons?

      --

      Hee-hee. Dying tickles!
    3. Re:Doesn't matter by nagora · · Score: 2

      My advice is go and see it! And don't bother reading this unless you've read the book - big spoiler alert!

      Frodo is particularly undermined by the writing, he never gets to act on his own; he is not allowed to defy the Nazgul at the ford and even when he leaves the Fellowship we have an added scene of him debating about it with Aragon.

      What had been the saddest scene in the first book - Frodo, Bilbo, and the Ring - is played for a cheap shock effect instead of developing both Frodo and Bilbo's characters.

      Aragon only once displays any knowlege of the outdoors - looking for herbs - and never gives any impression of being 90 years old, much of that time having been spent in the wilds fighting Sauron.

      Legolas has no character at all. His character is weak in the book, but not this weak.

      If Boromir mentions his brother and their strained relationship I missed it.

      The council of Elrond is a shambles with no rhyme or reason to it unless you've read the book. It is a hard part to film interestingly, but even so Gimli acts like an idiot for no obvious reason. And was Bilbo having a nap during it?

      Lothlorien is dire beyond belief; Galadriel does not mention that she bears one of the great rings or that Frodo's quest will undo all that he sees there, nor do we even see her giving the gifts out, even though they leave Lorien with them (we do see Frodo's vial in a flashback). Sam doesn't get to look in the mirror which sets up important material for the third book/film. We do get treated to the worst special effect in the film when Galadriel goes a bit mad during her 'Queen of darkness' speech.

      Only minor mention is made of the rivalry and mistrust between the elves and dwarves, even in Lorien. This negates the importance of Gimli and Legolas's friendship.

      Saruman forgets to mention that he has become "many colours"; an important symbolic development for when Gandalf the white appears later. Radagast is never mentioned; Saruman's distain for him being an important character point in the book. This could have been done quickly and easily in a three hour film.

      The flight to the bridge in Moria is interrupted by a long and very silly bit of action involving a multi-ton block of masonry and rock being carfully balanced by two people leaning around on the top of it. Presumably the Balrog was standing at the top patiently waiting for them to finish so he could duck around to meet them at the bridge (in the book the Balrog can't follow because the tunnel has collapsed after his magical struggle with Gandalf). This last point also brings up the issue of Saruman and Gadalf's break-dancing scene. Seeing Gandalf resort to violent magic so easily undermines everything important to his character. It's a bit like seeing a film about Jesus kicking Pilot's arse - it's simply not his approach. It also waters-down the scene with the Balrog which in the book is the first (and only) time we see him reveal his true power.

      The direction is very poor. The director has no sense of tension or suspense at all. The audience is told that the Balrog is in Moria before seeing it; Gandalf simply states that Gollum is following them, there is no strage footsteps or lights behind them; we are told, rather than suspecting, that the weather on the mountain is not natural; we know what the significance of the White Hand is before the characters encounter it; the birds are spies and not normal birds - no room for doubt here; All issues of tension that do exist are dealt with in the scene they arise in, making every scene a little film in itself with little reference to what follows or proceeds in terms of building atmosphere.

      The fight scenes are so over-done that the Hobbits have to become little death machines just to support the idea that the Fellowship could survive against such numbers. This in turn undermines Merry and Pippen by losing any slow development of them to the point where they return to the Shire as heroes - they are already great (and thin) fighters when they set out.

      The Nazgul themselves are presented incorrectly at Weathertop and in such a way as to make them look even less effective than the orcs which the hobbits later mince. In the book they had discared their physical forms for their 'holes in the sky' look which would have been much more chilling. They then proceed to do a keystone-cops routine with Aragon.

      There is a scene with the stone trolls from The Hobbit in the background but they are never refered to, even though the characters have a rest in front of them!

      We see Narsil's shards but it is not clear what the imporance of it is and we have no mention of its re-forging. Does Aragon have it with him? It it of any significance at all? We'll never know.

      And look: the Argonath! Very impressive. What is it? Oh, don't worry about that, it's not important enough to explain when there's another ten minute fight scene up ahead.

      The animated version did a better job of covering The Fellowship of the Ring in an hour than this does in three (the animated version then disintegrates as it moves into The Two Towers). Interestingly, there is an entire scene and bits of other scenes which are copied from the animated film even though they do not appear in the book.

      And...as Sam and Frodo walk away, down towards Mordor and their destiny, what director would neglect to fade to credits just as a certain bent, almost reptilian form creeps into view, following the Precious? Well, apparently this one would.

      Utterly inept direction of the first class.

      The scenery and the effects (apart from Galadriel) are very good and there are many moments which would make great illustrations to the book, but the characters and plot are thin and uninteresting.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    4. Re:Doesn't matter by nagora · · Score: 2
      Other than that, many (professional, respected, established) critics

      Would these be the same critics who thought Titanic was a great film?

      Question: You are spending 300 million dollars on a series of films. What percentage of that would ensure good reviews in the right places? Supplimentary Question: what percentage of the profits would ensure good reviews?

      I've posted a long answer to Jorrit explaining the problems with the film that I feel have been ignored by "professional" critics.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    5. Re:Doesn't matter by Khazunga · · Score: 1
      That could be true, were not Peter Jackson one of my favourite directors of all time, and were not all of his movies I've seen B-grade movies. Budgets so low that in "Braindead" they used pork's blood from a meat shop instead of artificial blood, in the lawn mowner scene.

      Please, try to see "Meet the Feebles" and "Braindead" to get a good grip on Jackson's style. "Bad Taste" is also a good one, following Braindead's style. "Meet the Feebles" got the theater I was in laughing for one hour straight. Absolutely amazing.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    6. Re:Doesn't matter by Jorrit · · Score: 1

      Actually Bilbo WAS having a nap. Keep in mind that Bilbo is very old and I remember that Bilbo had trouble staying awake during that council. Note that I only read the book five times so I may misremember :-)

      Greetings,

      --
      Project Manager of Crystal Space (http://www.crystalspace3d.org). Support CS at http://tinyurl.com/cb3x4
    7. Re:Doesn't matter by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Ok, so taken as an adaptation of the book, it leaves a lot to be desired. But you know what? Taken as a movie on it's own, it's quite good. And that's the point.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    8. Re:Doesn't matter by nagora · · Score: 1
      Taken as a movie on it's own, it's quite good. And that's the point.

      I disagree, my main complaint is the gutting of the characters and surely it's characterisation that makes a really good movie?

      It's not utterly terrible, it just not anything like as good as people are saying.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    9. Re:Doesn't matter by nagora · · Score: 1
      they used pork's blood from a meat shop

      Hey, don't knock it - it did wonders for Alien!

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    10. Re:Doesn't matter by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Lets face it, you're looking at a 10 hour miniseries to avoide 'gutting' the characters. Given the constraints he had to work with (a three hour movie in today's attention deficient market?) he did a good job.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    11. Re:Doesn't matter by nagora · · Score: 1
      I meant more that I couldn't remember him appearing in the council scene at all; though I may have missed him. Did you see him?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    12. Re:Doesn't matter by bryanbrunton · · Score: 1


      Jackson had to balance action against exposition and character and story development. While he did a decent job at this balancing act I too think he could have cut more action from the film. However, you strike me as one of the Tolkien nuts who would simply haven't come to grips with the fact that the greater majority of the exposition and character/story development from the LoTR simply doesn't make for a good movie.

      The movie that you desire is simply not possible. The printed page simply doesn't transfer to the screen easily. Movies are about SHOWING things. They are about characters DOING thing and TALKING to each other. You can only have so many sequences where characters talk about things (so that the audience may understand them) in an un-natural manner before people begin to fall asleep.

      Your observations are consistently wrong:

      >>Frodo is particularly undermined by the writing, he never gets to act on his own

      No. Frodo is allowed a number of scenes with both Bilbo and Gandalf where he gets ample opportunity to act on his own.

      >>What had been the saddest scene in the first book - Frodo, Bilbo, and the Ring - is played for a cheap shock effect

      While the CG in that scene was overdone, the scene itself still retained all of its emotion. Ian Holm's acting was GREAT.

      >> Aragon only once displays any knowlege of the outdoors

      No. He mentions names of places. He takes over from Gandalf in a convincing manner.

      >>If Boromir mentions his brother and their strained relationship I missed it.

      Simply not possible. Any exposition of that would have left the audience going "What the Fuck!".

      >>but even so Gimli acts like an idiot for no obvious reason

      Gimli acts exactly like a strong willed, simple minded dwarf in that scene. The scene is also necessary to show the power of the ring.

      >>Only minor mention is made of the rivalry and mistrust between the elves and dwarves

      The mistrust was aptly featured in two scenes. You must be blind!

      >>Saruman forgets to mention that he has become "many colours"

      Another "What the Fuck?" request from a Tolkien nut. Perhaps Saruman's bunking up with Orcs can clue the audience into that fact?

      >>Seeing Gandalf resort to violent magic so easily undermines everything important to his character

      Perhaps the later battle scenes where Gandalf's magic plays an important role will unconvince you of this delusion.

      >>audience is told that the Balrog is in Moria before seeing it

      Again, another film-making necessity. Besides, Saruman never explicity mentions that there is a Balrog in Moria.

      >>The fight scenes are so over-done that the Hobbits have to become little death machines

      Death Machines? Again, have your vision checked. They put up ZERO resistance against the orcs following Boromirs death.

    13. Re:Doesn't matter by nagora · · Score: 2
      However, you strike me as one of the Tolkien nuts

      I've read each of the Middle Earth Trilogy once each, I did like them though. I had also seen the animated version and heard some of the BBC version. I did read LotR recently, so it was fresh in my mind.

      the greater majority of the exposition and character/story development from the LoTR simply doesn't make for a good movie.

      I don't think that's true. There is a lot of "colour", partularly the songs, poetry and detailed history, which could not be used but story and character development can always be used, and three hours is ample space to do so. But, certainly, not everything can make it in even in three hours.

      The movie that you desire is simply not possible.

      Give me the money and I'll prove that wrong! The movie I had hoped to see is certainly possible.

      You can only have so many sequences where characters talk about things (so that the audience may understand them) in an un-natural manner before people begin to fall asleep.

      This is true but ignores the amount of action from the book which was dropped too: the fight with the Wargs, the bit with Merry (or Pippen, I forget) encountering the Nazgul in Bree, possibly showing Aragon capturing Gollum (something only touched on in the book), Saruman misleading the Nazgul, Gandalf's race back from Orthanc to the Prancing Pony, more time buliding an atmosphere in Moria (Moria and Lorien were wasted in this version; moreso Lorien).

      Frodo is allowed a number of scenes with both Bilbo and Gandalf where he gets ample opportunity to act on his own.

      I meant act as in "act as his own agent", ie to determine the course of events. The ford is particularly damaging to Frodo's character as it is the first time he demonstrates to others why Gandalf has faith in him: alone, wounded and at bay he refuses the call of the Nazgul and their Lord. To be rescued without the chance to defy the nine is to remove the single most important step in Frodo's journey, the one where he stops simply running and starts choosing.

      While the CG in that scene was overdone, the scene itself still retained all of its emotion.

      Compare it to the version in the animated film; there's no question to me which one had more emotion. The sight of Bilbo literally shaking with desire for the Ring combined with Frodo's clenching fist is a much more powerful scene.

      Ian Holm's acting was GREAT.

      I'll not hear a bad word about Ian Holm's acting, his "I have come, but I do not choose now to do what I came to do" on the edge of Mount Doom is spine-chilling.

      No. He mentions names of places. He takes over from Gandalf in a convincing manner.

      I don't mean his geography was poor; Frodo could name places! He is never given a chance to show skills like tracking and "wood lore". He does take over quite well, but that's not really being a Ranger.

      Simply not possible. Any exposition of that would have left the audience going "What the Fuck!".

      Particularly since I was wrong: the strain was between Faramir and his father, not his brother. Either way I think Boromir should have mentioned his brother and his patrols against Mordor.

      Gimli acts exactly like a strong willed, simple minded dwarf in that scene. The scene is also necessary to show the power of the ring.

      At that point we've been told several times that the ring can only be destroyed in one place and we've also seen that a normal fire can not even heat it. We've also been told that seven rings were given to the dwarves. Apparenty Gimli has not been told about their properties. Or perhaps he's just simple minded. In either case why would he be sent to the council as the Dwarf representative?

      The mistrust was aptly featured in two scenes. You must be blind!

      Interesting that you should say that. The elves did not require Gimli's eyes to be blindfolded going into Lorien. There is a brief mention of dwarves being noisy and someone says something like "oh, look a dwarf and an elf together" at some point but I don't know where you get "aptly" from.

      Perhaps the later battle scenes where Gandalf's magic plays an important role will unconvince you of this delusion.

      What part are you thinking of? Gandalf's actions are almost always to bolster the morale or courage of others. He sets fire to some wolves in the Hobbit and does some illusions but generally he only makes powerful moves against those on his own "level" such as the Balrog, the Nazgul (rarely) and Sauron himself. Certainly his magic is important later, but it is not directly violent.

      Again, another film-making necessity.

      A film making necessity!?! What sort of talk is that? Spoiling the suspense is "film making necessity"? Catch a fucking grip.

      Besides, Saruman never explicity mentions that there is a Balrog in Moria

      No, he just shows us a sketch in a book instead.

      Death Machines? Again, have your vision checked. They put up ZERO resistance against the orcs following Boromirs death.

      Yes, you are right, the film is inconsistent too. The same Hobbits that fully engage in the Weathertop and Moria combat, killing several orcs and jumping onto the cave troll to stab it, do also just stand by during Boromir's death. Perhaps they were tired after all that fighting.

      And I never even got around to mentioning the continuity errors of the re-appearing staff and the magical dancing mountains of the Shire!

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    14. Re:Doesn't matter by nagora · · Score: 2

      Lets face it, you're looking at a 10 hour miniseries to avoid 'gutting' the characters.

      Oh, come on. Surely three hours to cover less than 400 pages is not that much of a strain? Especially once all the songs and side-stories are cut out and the weight of all the descriptive passages are taken by the visuals.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    15. Re:Doesn't matter by jafac · · Score: 2

      *sigh*

      That's the problem. Our standards and expectations have been lowered by the decline of American Cinema.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    16. Re:Doesn't matter by jafac · · Score: 2

      I agree with everything you said.

      And I would also say that Elijah Wood's acting SUCKED.

      However, I still loved the movie, and gladly paid to watch it twice, and will likely buy the DVD. It's a really difficult book to cinemize. I can pick nits and say it's not perfect, but it was a tremendous job.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  171. I heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The MTV article says that NSYNC asked for the part; an article in a UK tabloid says Lucas asked them."

    I heard NSYNC is making an appearence by request of Lucas' daughter.

  172. So, all you people who are panning Ep2.... by Minupla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How many of you will vote with your pocket book, and mindshare by not seeing it (including in the theater, pirating it, renting it on video, etc)...

    Wouldn't it be a lot more quiet in here if all the rest of you would shut up?

    I'll go see it. It'll have cool FX, lots of stuff will go boom, and I can pretend I'm a 12 yr old. Heck, at my age even a couple of hours of being a 12 yr old again will be worth it.

    Do what I did next time, watch Ep 4. Watch it honestly, not in nostaliga mode. It's predictable, and geared for 12 yr olds. Gee, I seem to recall seeing commercials for Star Wars toys playing when I was 12, in between the cartoons. Maybe, just maybe, the movies aren't getting dumber, maybe we're getting older and have different tastes (I wouldn't say we're getting any smarter :)).

    Just some food for thought.

    Minupla

    --
    On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    1. Re:So, all you people who are panning Ep2.... by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

      I was willing to give AotC a chance, even with the completely retarded name. I didn't think TPM was really that bad, but I knew it could've been better, and I knew that TPM was really not meant for me, but for those a bit younger than I was.

      But this just breaks with everything that is star wars. Having a bunch of talentless monkeys show up simply because they have a gazillion dollars, even with Lucas knowing full well this will upset many of his core fanbase for the series.

      I thought that Lucas still had integrity, even after TPM. I remember the Lucas that forewent giving the role of Luke Skywalker to a well known actor because he wanted some not so well known actor to have a crack at it.

      This is not the same Lucas anymore. I feel somewhat betrayed. So, excuse me if I'm a little fucking mad about it!

    2. Re:So, all you people who are panning Ep2.... by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      All the money that star wars(and epI) made wasn't by selling tickets to 12 year olds. There are far more adult aged people in this country than kids.

      Its those adults who wanted to go back and recapture thier childhood. Problem is they way lucas presented this prequel appealed far more to 5-10 year old market than the 13 on up market.

      For example :I remember reading subtitles while watching star wars as a kid. Now everyone speaks english even though everyone seemed to understand it in ep4.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    3. Re:So, all you people who are panning Ep2.... by EvilNight · · Score: 1

      I'll download a rip of it. If the rip looks honestly decent and enetertaining, I'll actually go see it in the theater, but I'm having trouble believing that this might happen.

      I'll vote with my pocketbook in the DVD department. I won't be buying any of the SW DVDs, even the original series, because of the butchering done by Lucas. Greedo shoots first? Please. Instead I'll hunt down a set of the SW Laserdiscs and make my own set of DVDs from that material, because that's the best we can expect from SW anymore, and it won't have the bullshit edits.

      I just hope he doesn't butcher Indy 4 like he has Star Wars.

      --
      Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
    4. Re:So, all you people who are panning Ep2.... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      then explain all the adult hype that happened after ep4 came out? the acadamy awards? the audience full of adults that actually ducked when the star destroyer came on screen?
      The toy angle was given to lucas because the studio didn't see that kids toys based on an adult sci-fi monie would sell?

      I have heard that "your just nostaligc" crap enough. I have wathed ep4, all thing considered, it was substantially better then ep1.
      ep1 could have been much better if:
      there was less "oops, started the craft", "oops got it into space", "oops flew into enemy ship", "oops blew up device that controls all the bad guy"
      and
      Jar Jar was less stupid, and more alien. If Jar-Jar had released those globes on purpose, my views on the character would have gone fom, jeez what a lame character, to hey, he wasn't stupid, he was just alien.
      and
      no medi-cloridians. "the force is strong with this one" was all we needed.

      I know all the accidental events where supposed to be the force, but it goes against his own mythos.

      I liked most of every thing else, but he thing I didn't like destroy ed the whole movie.
      talk about an underuse of samual jacksons talent, sheeesh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:So, all you people who are panning Ep2.... by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 1

      Umm, pardon me, but for the life of me, I thought that in the original Greedo *did* shoot first...that's what made Han so cool. He anticipated Greedo.

      If I'm wrong, please refresh my memory. Coulda sworn all these years Greedo fired first...

    6. Re:So, all you people who are panning Ep2.... by d-e-w · · Score: 1

      and no medi-cloridians.

      Am I the only one for whom that reference brings up bizarre connections to L'Engle's use of mitochondria in "A Wind in the Door" (for those not familar, it's a sequel to "A Wrinkle in Time," published in 1973.)

      I always thought that the mitochondria as used in her "Wrinkle" novel series were supposed to explain Charlie's "specialness," and I couldn't stop thinking about it when the Jedis went off on that genetic tangent.

    7. Re:So, all you people who are panning Ep2.... by jafac · · Score: 2

      *sigh*

      If I did not have an 8 year old boy, I wouldn't think twice about watching this movie, buying the DVD, buying the boxed-set collector's edition DVD, etc. etc.

      Maybe I'll just send him to a matinee with his friends and not go in. I'll wait in the parkinglot and read the newspaper. A better use of my time.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:So, all you people who are panning Ep2.... by Snaller · · Score: 1
      Maybe, just maybe, the movies aren't getting dumber, maybe we're getting older and have different tastes


      Or maybe the movies ARE getting dumber...

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    9. Re:So, all you people who are panning Ep2.... by Stanza · · Score: 1

      I'm not planning on seeing it. Not unless I hear rave reviews from people I trust. Granted I usually never see movies, but I was excited about episode 1... until I actually saw it.

  173. I have never heard of nsync, but... by ignavus · · Score: 1

    It sure sounds like a big come-down after all the heavy adult stuff in the first series, like ... ewoks.

    I remember watching 'A New Hope' in the 1970s as a university student - the average age in the cinema crowd must have been 13. I felt so old.

    PS: does anyone else think of the next episode as Attack of the Clowns?

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  174. Hardly a troll. It's called perspective. by jpellino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look at the face of this issue again.

    It seems the alarum was sounded because he's (*gasp*) signing pop stars with little acting experience into what many people seem to think is an unassailable classic series. In fact, Mark Hamill has a singularly undistinguished acting career except for the three SW movies. Even he knows it and parodies himself a lot. Jay & Silent Bob, numerous TV walk-ons, etc.

    Corvette Summer? Shoot me now.

    Star Wars stopped being about the mythology a long time ago - the 9 scripts were outlined ages ago, and he's painting himself into smaller and smaller corners by having to make everything work out according to what we all know happened in the original. We should all be able to recite the screen play for III by thte time we walk out of II.

    But look at Titanic - we all know the outcome, three hours long, nails-on-the-blackboard performances, but put the right pop-idol's name on the marquee and call it an epic, and you get a license to print money.

    So, at least in the studio's eyes, all that's left is to hang onto those frames whatever it takes to get people to sit in theatres for the remainder. I could watch any of these movies until my eyes popped out, but let's be honest - high art they ain't.

    And it's easy to get wrapped up: when a sci-fi wonk claims - with a straight face - the term 'blockbuster' was invented for one of the SW premieres, we all need to take a moment.

    And consider the converse - casting two highly regarded nearly-shakespearean actors didn't save Phantom from the wailing and rending of cloth by die-hard SW standard-bearers.

    So in the scheme of things, boy-band extras is hardly a big deal, is SOP on some level, and guess what - Lucas is not immune.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  175. Jar Jar Amnesia? by Trinition · · Score: 1
    Yeah, this is offtopic, but maybe there's a common thread...

    Do we all have amnesia? Jar Jar Binks sucks, this is true. However, didn't ROTJ (Return of the JEDI) also have Ewoks? Think about it, they were both seemingly innocent but ultimately had a large impact (albeit one was through rutic cleverness while the other was through clumsiness). At the time, I loved the Ewoks (I even ha dthe Ewok village)

    1. Re:Jar Jar Amnesia? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I remember the ewoks. they where lame, and unbelievable. come on, a stick takes out a Guy in armor? they should have either been wookies, or have found a weapons depot and raided it.
      of course the scence wo the ewoks fighting where pretty cool, and the conflict between Vador on Luke was very good, good enough for me to disregard the ewoks, but in ep1 the core of the movie was "be cutsy".

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  176. Re:Umm, right. And Alec Guinness was from where? by hughk · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Hamil may have sucked but Guinness was there with a very impressive history of appearences and IMDB being far from reliable, it omits his work as Smiley in the award-winning cold war espionage TV series based on Le Carre's books. He may have made more from Star Wars after historically agreeing to a percentage than anything else but his other stuff is definitely worth a look. Good actors do not make a movie, look at The Phantom Menace. Once we get away from Jar-Jar Binks (I don't blame the actor, Ahmed Best there), we have some heavies like Liam Neeson and Terence Stamp assisted by Ewan McGregor and Natalie Portman. All of these have done some good work, but this was not it! I often feel that having a script directed by its author is not the best idea. A director supervises the editing and must be able to say what gets left out. It always difficult to scrap something that you spent a lot of time on and frankly, Jar-Jar should have been left sitting on the cutting room floor.

    Maybe Lucas was more objective with himself in Star Wars 4: A New Hope. He was new (only one major film out, American Graffiti), and under a tight budget. His other film in the genre, THX1138 was well thought of but not widely distributed.

    If somone wants to be an extra and be shot at, I don't care. It is if they actually have lines then I start to get concerned.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  177. Well, which do we believe more? by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    A tabloid or the shiny things network? I'm inclined to go with the tabloid - at least their fans are semi-literate. :-)

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  178. I wouldn't call them just kid's movies by ColGraff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They were rated PG, and certainly appealed to kids, but there were elements that really were targeted at adults. I'd call them family films in the truest sense of the phrase - films everyone in the family can enjoy, as opposed to the pasturized crap they call "Family Films" now.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  179. Considering how Lucas used Jar-Jar... by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    ...do you really trust him to exercise that sort of discretion?

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  180. But Yet. . . by cgleba · · Score: 1

    But yet I'll probably still see it in the theatres. . .it's like seeing a train wreck. . .you don't want to see it because you'll know you'll be repulsed but at the same time your curious about it. . ..

    Worse comes to worse I think the new James Bond film will be out at about the same time. . .the only James Bond film to EVER disappoint me was "License to Kill". . . .

  181. How about Bruce and Linus instead? by dannyspanner · · Score: 1

    And of course, if it had been Bruce Perens and Linus Torvalds instead of N'Stink we'd all be disgusted at the blatent attempt to pander to the Linux geek market, wouldn't we? Wouldn't we? :/

    1. Re:How about Bruce and Linus instead? by Anonymous+Crouton · · Score: 0

      Actually to be perfectly honest, I probably would have been. I thought the movie was done, and personally I think Lucas has stuffed enough big names in to the movie at this point. Leave it be and release the damn thing.

      But, as we've seen he can't leave well enough alone, between his trying to push technology as hard as possible, to the fact that he should've allowed someone else to write the screenplays and direct the rest of the movies.. But what do we matter, we're only the fans right?

      Wow.. I sound cynical, maybe I shouldn't post when I'm sick.

  182. Demographics Didn't Change - Lucas Did by JoeTech · · Score: 1

    After the success of Star Wars: A New Hope, Lucas didn't know what to do - he got high smoking some ego-boosting Joseph Campbell tripe and tried to claim that he had the whole multipart story laid out/written/etc. but then faltered with what has come since.

    Look at the "official" book "Splinter in a Mind's Eye" - it changes what Empire and Jedi show.

    SW Ep2: Attack of the Clones = Titanic In Space - really good special effects with a sappy, lame story.

  183. Uhm... if he's given a cameo... by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

    ...wouldn't he be playing himself ?

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  184. Let's face it - Lucas is over-rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucas is out of his league - he has created something that is bigger than himself - that has a collective conscious that puts his imagination and originality to shame. He simply can't live up to the hype - and all the Joseph Campbell bull shit, myth creator, hero blah blah blah who gives a crap. The material was best served when he wasn't behind the camera - we all know it. He is playing now to real children, ala Disney, and you can say all you want but the first 2 movies were not just for kids. I would love to see a Soderbergh get to shoot a Stars War movie - that would be entertaining...

  185. Empire Strikes Back by Luminous · · Score: 2

    Empire Strikes Back has been hailed as the better of the original trilogy but didn't Lucas put in Billy Dee Williams for a similar reason he is using 'NSync?

    For crying out loud, just because someone is appearing in the movie doesn't change the tone or nature of the movie. They aren't going to be a Boy Band of Jedi Knights. They get to be background actors who get fried by Battle Droids.

    --
    This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  186. I thought.. by Anonymous+Crouton · · Score: 0

    Let me open with the fact that I thought episode II was done already. As you read the rest of my comment, bear in mind that for a very long time and infact up until recently I was a huge star wars fan.

    I thought I'd have some faith in Episode II, but with this addition, I really have to question whether or not I will even see the movie..

    I heard about this on the radio last night and was disappointed to say the least.. Why won't lucas sell the franchise off to someone else, or let someone else take it over, he apparently doesn't have any idea what to do with his films anymore... Give it to someone with vision, or at least someone who might remain true to what the originals were.

    Yes they were cheesy at points, and the acting wasn't great, but it was a good story. Now EP:1 seemed like it was a test of technology, to push as far as it could go, and EP:2 I fear may be the same. Except that in EP:2 there is going to be a pile of fairly big name celebrities in highly advanced CG effects.

    I really want to see EP:2 for the lightsaber battles, but the addition of NSuck to it may drive me from seeing the movie on the big screen at all. Its really depressing that a few well placed mistakes about these movies could ruin one of my all time favorites. I still love the originals, but the EP:1 was something of a disgrace, EP:2 unless its spectaular, above and beyond what everyone is expecting, the movie may really destroy what little is left of Star Wars. At least in my opinion anyway, yours may and probably does vary.

  187. Are My Comments Considered Clones too? by Mobster · · Score: 1

    Here is my rant, rave, or what have you:

    I liked all 4 movies. I thought Jar Jar was tolerable. I bought Star Wars toys as a kid. I could care less about N'Sayne being in the movie cuz I'll probably never even notice them. George Lucas makes movies for a living, and likes it. Yes, George is wealthy, but why should I care if he gets wealthier off my $8 cuz he made a movie I wanted to see. But.. to each his own. So.. "Let the stoning of George Lucas Begin!"

    And now I put it to you... "George Lucas. Soon to be as evil as Billy Gates?"

    'nuff said

    --
    ---- You have been programmed by the Illuminati to not see the word ""!
  188. Not Just Lovelorn Teenage Girls by McFly777 · · Score: 1

    I too saw the trailer before LOTR. But what I saw was Padme/Amadalla in a corset.

    Honestly, if the walk through cameo is as short as some here seem to be suggesting (walk, walk, *BOOM*), I for one, wouldn't have recognised that Nsync was even there. (I probably would have wondered about the the young girl swooning in the next row, however.)

    --

    McFly777
    - - -
    "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  189. Would have been funny if u got the story right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luke didn't find out that Darth Vader was his father until Episode 5 or 6.

  190. Late Night with Conan OBrien by thunker · · Score: 0

    Conan said that Lucas wanted NSYNC to help C3PO look less gay. I think Lucas picked the right people to do the job.

  191. why so surprised? by Stalcair · · Score: 1
    instead of "Lucas has really sold out THIS time"
    perhaps it would be more accurate to just say, "Lucas continues along on his well established journey of selling out"

    Lucas cares little about telling a well involved story for the purpose of entertaining. He just wants to hook in more people, which we know will buy toys and other merchandise that will equal more dinero for Lucas. I have long read the books (granted not ALL of them) and have always been fascinated by the universe it set up. I have also been very fascinated in seeing how things got the way they did, and I was hoping the prequel trilogy would tell that. It is apparent that Lucas does not have the ethics or talent necessary to produce movies that have adult themes and do not 'cute' their way into the wallets, er hearts, of children. LOTR was a good example of how you can make a story appeal to all, make it a family story yet without 'dumbing it down'. It is a shame that: 1) Lucas has not the ability to perform this, and 2) Refuses to admit it and let others who DO have that talent do his writing.

    It seems to me, that if he let writers from the book series write the story FIRST, then had (still not him) a person write the screen adaptation, then we would have a great set of movies.

    ARE YOU READY TO MERCHANDISE? Soon, no retail outlet, grocery, greeting card, toy or pet store will be free from the clutches of the merchandising machine. And of course the internet will be bursting at the seems with adds and fanboy sites. I would consider myself a fanboy, but not of Lucas. Lucas created a great idea, and deserves great credit for it. However, as evidenced by the number of people who prefer Empire Strikes Back, I think we all know that Lucas is not the one to pick to write (or oversee the writing) of any more movies, from that initial idea.

    Well, just my idea. OK, I have my flame retardant gear on, so fire away!

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

  192. Rocked! Sucked big time more like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wake up everybody. LOTR was dull. Theres a lot of big fat books out there, but thats no excuse to make them into terminally dull films.

    No I hadn't read the book when I saw it. Should I have to? Why did it stop abruptly at the end? Whats with the stupid flaming eye thing all the time? Hence the film is pants if you've not read the book.

    I have now read the (first) book. Tolkien goes something like this... Tedious mind numbing detail about place, characters walk to next place, Tedious mind numbing detail about place, characters fight ever larger creature. Repeat.

    Sadly Tolkein's work now looks like the worst D&D cliches stitched together. Yes I know he invented all this stuff. So respect for that, however it STILL looks like the worst D&D cliches stitched together. So don't make a film of it. Don't even bother reading the book any more as IT LOOKS LIKE THE WORST D&D CLICHES STITCHED TOGETHER. Read a modern fantasy book that builds upon the (admittedly solid) foundations laid by Tolkein.

    1. Re:Rocked! Sucked big time more like. by Dick_Fury · · Score: 1

      If that's what you thought then maybe you should stick to reading Entertainment magazine, or Teen Peopl,e or whatever vapid people like you occupy yourselves with. Maybe a yo-yo or a good game of connect-four.

    2. Re:Rocked! Sucked big time more like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't agree more! I'm sick of hearing the great LOTR. It was three hours of boring crap.

      Here is my rendition of LOTR:

      Hobbit acquires evil ring. Hobbits get in trouble with evil. Hobbits get saved. Hobbits get in trouble with evil. Hobbits get saved. Hobbits get in trouble with evil. Hobbits get saved. Hobbits get in trouble with evil. Hobbits get saved. Human dies. Hobbits go off to get in more trouble. Movie ends with no clear conclusion.

      And is it just me, or are the side-kick Hobbits as annoying (if not more annoying) as Jar-Jar? Gee. I'm a dumbass Hobbit. Watch me make lots of noise by backing into a stupid well. Gee, another reasons for Hobbits to get in trouble with evil, and get saved.

      At least I got free candy from the theater!

      - D. Muller, Cols. OH

  193. I don't care if they'll only be in it for a second by Dick_Fury · · Score: 1

    For all the people saying "they're only in it for a second and they'll get killed anyway", or some variant of that, I dont think it matters. If you see even a little spot of mold on a piece of bread, you dont eat it. If you see even a little scratch on a new car, you dont buy it. I dont care if they're in it for 10 seconds or 2 hours, they're in it. We might as well slap a wig, some lipstick, a miniskirt and some 4" heels on Lucas, because he's whored himself out. To advertisers, to his daughter, to some prancing prettyboy pop band, it doesnt matter. The movie isn't a pure anymore. This leads me to believe that the movie will be as plastic and artificial and commercial as the music of the wannabe musicians that will be in it. man i'm pissed.

  194. Is it any wonder why it's titled what it is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attack of the clones?

    Perhaps it's a war to rid the universe of the ultimate evil NSync! Please oh please!

  195. How do they pick stories here? by MisterQueue · · Score: 1

    Sigh...from my submission list:

    2002-01-02 18:21:16 N'Sync in "Attack of the Clones" (articles,movies) (rejected)

    Whatever...

    -Q

    --
    "I was not put on this earth to listen to meat! Frylock..were you?" -Master Shake
  196. Re:Because it's only special effects? by mblase · · Score: 5, Funny

    So's their music.

    *ba-dum*

  197. Re:Hardly a troll. It's called perspective. by arkanes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Incidently, while Hamill is notorious for making crappy, crappy movies, he does really great voiceover work in animation - as the Joker in the Batman animated show on the WB, and several other things I can't think of now and can't be bothered to find.

  198. The Wonderful Thing About Tiggers by SrA_Pus · · Score: 1

    ...is Tiggers are wonderful things...

    How can you possibly suggest that Tigger is a cartoon character from which adults can glean nothing?

    If everyone were like Pooh, the world would be a much nicer place in which to live. And we all need a little Tigger from time to time.

    --
    What if I gave you three dollars? How much? Thr-- four dollars? Keep talking, I'm listening.
  199. Depressing, and wickedly Ironic by EvilNight · · Score: 1

    That Star Wars, once an Icon for originality and daring filmmaking, should now become an Icon for corporate filmmaking and the typical crap coming out of Hollywood nowdays. What a collective kick in the face. Thanks George, I'm still clawing the dirt out of my teeth from TPM.

    Don't feed me any pussy arguments about Lucas not owing his fans anything. That's bullshit of the highest order. His fans made him into what he is today. Granted, Lucas created Star Wars, the IP is his, and I support his right to do whatever he wants with it. That does not mean I won't tear him to shreds for destroying the artistic integrity of his work. Artistic merit is not decided by the creator of the art, it is decided by the reception of the art by the audience and the reception of the art ONLY.

    It's about Greedo shooting first. That sums up everything. All those clever little edits to the original trilogy to make it less daring... we should have suspected something then. We walked into TPM like walking into a brick wall. Everyone was willing to give Lucas so much credit because Indiana jones and Star Wars were so awesome. I think Lucas has just burned up all the leeway he's going to be allowed. I haven't felt this dirty since Metallica's sellout.

    You know what reaction the AOTC (or Starwars 90210) trailer has been getting in any theater I've seen it in? Snorts, guffaws, shrugs, rolling eyes. When I attended the midnight LOTR premiere, that crowd was VERY harsh. The trailer was openly booed by the audience, with a few in the back even shouting "SELLOUT" over the general chatter. The word is out... It's not that N'Synch is awful (which they are), it's just the mere IDEA that Lucas would include them in the first place.

    I'm not sure if I'll go see it in the theater at all. I think I'll download a rip of this one first and give it a good look. I know this one will be pirated before it hits the silver screen, just due to the number of disgruntled SW fans. If the rip looks good, maybe I'll go see it. I won't hold my breath. This movie just looks like a rehas of Titanic and Pearl Harbor with Lightsabers. Big friggin deal. How pedestrian.

    I won't be buying any SW DVDs, including the original series if they contain the edits. I'll make my own DVDs from the original Laserdisc editions before I give Lucas one more dollar.

    I'd so love to be wrong on this one...

    --
    Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
  200. irritating boy bands by towaz · · Score: 1

    "But unfortunately for fans they are all bumped off within seconds by savage androids"

    At least its what most the audiance will want to see.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
  201. Life imitates art? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
    From the Spice Girls Die Violent Deaths website, which, after the first few stories, started delivering some truly WICKED parodies of pop culture: Spice Girls vs Star Wars Episode 1: The Phantom Menance outtake:
    Lucas: I can't, Rick. I can't sleep. Not until I figure out why people didn't like the movie, and what I can do to beat Cameron!
    McCallum: Well, our feedback indicates that a lot of people despised the movie because of Ja...
    Lucas: Wait! I've got it! I know why people didn't want to see the movie over and over again!
    McCallum: Oh, so you have read the feedback reports?
    Lucas: What reports? I don't need reports to tell me that we're missing... the TF!
    McCallum: The what? TF? What does that stand for?
    Lucas: It's Hollywood slang for Teenybopper Factor. Cameron drowned that blasted Titanic movie with it like a kitten in a rain barrel!
    McCallum: No, really George. It says here that over 78% of your fans refused to see it a second time because of, and I quote: "That floppy-eared, brainless, annoying son of a..."
    Lucas: Yes, it's all falling into place! The only thing wrong with my movie is that not enough prepubescent girls or horny teenage boys wanted to see it!
    McCallum: No, George, seriously, listen to me. Read the damned reports. You ruined the movie by giving too much screen time to that annoying Gungan pri...
    Lucas: Can you see it, Rick? (Lucas waves his hands in the air for effect, despite being the only person in the room.) We'll make a special edition! It'll be just like the last three special editions, only it will have lots of cleavage and pop music!
    McCallum: George, are you even listening to me?
    Lucas: We could get B*Witched... or one of those boy bands simply oozing with homoeroticism...
    McCallum: I'm going to hang up in a second, George.
    Lucas (snapping his fingers): Of course! We'll get the Spice Girls! It's not like they're busy making albums or anything, plus they've made a movie before, so they already have the experience issue covered!
    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  202. Draw Your Own Conclusions by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > How is this informative? all he did was quote from the article.

    Well, since nobody on Slashdot reads the articles before commenting on them...

    Virg

  203. Re: "target" demographics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...well, Star Wars created its own demographic in 1976 when it came out.

    However, the people who fit this target demographic now actually like the whole pop music crapola (Brittany Spears, NSync, et al). The target demographic of 1976 is now the older (read: 30's) group of SlashDot...

    You know humility when you talk to a young person about something that happened in the late 70's/early 80's, which still seems like yesterday, and realize that they were just born that year...

  204. A Very Attack Of The Clones Christmas by Municipa · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else looking forward to this Jar Jar/N'Sync reunion in a couple of years?

  205. as long as i don't notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if i can watch the movie without noticing a boyband member in all the fray than i don't care. george lucas really screwed the pooch on this one.

  206. star wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let's not have any more articles about star wars - it's obvious that Lucas could put his bleeding sphincter on film and make more money from the fanboys than should be lawfully allowed('Howard the Duck' anyone?).

  207. Yes but Big Bird was not a sith lord in Star Wars by wyndwar · · Score: 1

    Yes but Big Bird was not a sith lord in Star Wars a New Hope. Can you imagine Captain Kangaroo as the voice of Vader? Sorry but this seriously taints my feelings towards this movie and my anticipation for others.

  208. Another thing by Municipa · · Score: 1

    I probably wouldn't mind this crap so much if they bothered to spend as much effort on the script and characters than they do deciding to film it digitally and all that crap.

    Like many, I saw the commentary movies they put up on the starwars.com site (btw, I always like to be kept in the dark as much as possible before seeing a movie - but with the new Star Wars, I figured what the hell). They go on excrutiating detail of why they choose to film digitally and about film making as an art and all that stuff we really just don't give a shit about.

    None of that half baked shit is why we liked Star Wars in the first place.

    Anyone try watching Phantom Menace a second or thrid time? It's just not interesting. You probably find yourself waiting to see the Darth Maul fight the whole time. And don't get me started on that drone activating and starship flying pansy. He does nothing else in the movie before the fight except look like a bad ass and press a few buttons.

  209. Alas, George Lucas by AugstWest · · Score: 2

    Another great director turned whore.

    Hollywood, how we do love thee and thy destructive ways.

  210. Does anyone working for Lucas know the word "No?" by Ticonderoga · · Score: 1

    I'm convinced the only prerequisite to working for George Lucas is the ability to say, "yes sir, that is an excellent idea."

  211. fa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a bad feeling about this.

  212. ..look at it this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could have been alot worse, they may have wanted to contribute to the soundtrack in some way.

  213. Wait! They get slaughtered apparently. by syrupMatt · · Score: 1

    I read this yesterday in the New York Post. Apparently 'Nsync play almost faceless Jedi in the background of a battle. A few second after they appear, they are slaughtered by battle drones.

    So basically, all of us who hate 'Nsync get our wishes fufilled, and see them obliterated.

    --
    "Moving through the masses like a fish through water." syrup
  214. Now, Now by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    The unknown actors were fairly evenly divided between good and bad. For every Mark Hamill overexpression there was a Harrison Ford smirk (remember, he wasn't a big name back then). For all of Carrie Fisher's swooning there was Anthony Daniels's angst, which he could express even without showing a human facial expression.

    Virg

  215. NSync notwithstanding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think anyone calling themselves a "/.er" has any self respect to begin with.

  216. Re:Slashdot demographics vs Star Wars target audie by Rupert · · Score: 2

    Don't diss Dumbo. It's a very good story. I don't think Disney could make something as good as Dumbo today.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  217. Taking it from both ends by martyn+s · · Score: 1

    This could turn out pretty well for Lucas; it could probably draw in two opposing demographics: the people who want to see nsync, and those who want to see them dead.

  218. credibility by enrico_suave · · Score: 2

    George Lucas can kiss his credibility "bye-bye-bye" (as if!?)

    E.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  219. AWESOME I ALWAYS WANTED TO SEE NSYNC by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    Get disemboweled and sliced from head to toe with light sabres.

  220. Actually, this is GOOD news. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1
    N'Suck dies in just seconds, and you don't notice them unless you know where and when to look ?


    Sounds like proof positive there IS a God. . . not that Lucas PLANNED it that way. . .

  221. Easy... by Shade,+The · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look for stupid hair-styles. All boy bands are required by law to have at least one member with stupid-looking hair; you just have to associate hair-style with band name.

  222. Re: Umm, think Sesame Street by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    Dunno how many people remember, but when the first Star Wars films were fresh from the theater, Lucas allowed R2D2 and C3PO to show up in several Sesame Street episodes, right along-side Big Bird and crew.

    He's *always* been a proponent of connecting the films to popular culture at the time of their release, in an attempt to gain more fans.

    Nowdays, kids are more likely to watch the cartoons on Nickelodeon (Spongebob, Rugrats, etc.), and/or be into the latest boy/girl band crazes.

  223. Which movie/s had the biggest take ? by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    let me rephrase this

    given that the intended audience for EP4/5 seemed to be wider than EP6-2, im curious which movies made more adjusted dollars and or wider viewing at the boxoffice.

    Anyone know?

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  224. For the love of God...... by SmackDown · · Score: 1

    Get Irvin Kershner to direct episode III. The man is a genius. Just look at Ep. 5 and Robocop 2. Ep. 3 is supposed to be bad-assed and dark as hell. IMHO, it should be so violent as to deserve an R-rating in order to justify the sappiness of Ep. 1.

  225. Time for...Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > And you did that by hovering your mouse over the time, didn't you?

    No, just the mouse pointer. Hovering the mouse would be just stupid.

    Geez.

  226. Goo-goo, gaa-gaa. Focus on infants?! by praedor · · Score: 2

    I will certainly NEVER see this one. I waited for Ep1 to come out on video before I sprang for that one. Wont do it for Ep2.


    Since the obvious audience for the latest incarnations, even starting back with Ep4 and those goddamn-stupid-awful muppet-like Ewoks, is the diaper-wearing set.


    Jar-Jar, Ewoks, a thumbsucking-aged Anakin/Darth who DRAG RACES(He should be yanked from his parents by social services since they had no problems with endangering the life of a frickin' infant), NSYNC... Damn diaper-wearering kiss-assing. Damn Lucas and his declining mental acuity and emotional regression.


    It IS possible to make an excellent movie, tell a cool story, that both adults and children can enjoy without dumbing it down to the lowest-common-denominator by sticking muppets and other cartoonish, ridiculous super-infants into it (see LOTR...even Harry Potter had a more mature focus than Lucas' Star Wars as it plods on).

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  227. Not Really by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Yeah, that Alec Guinness guy screwed the whole thing up for me. The whole time I was watching I couldn't help but see Doctor Zhivago. And don't even get me started about Peter "This is a horror film?!?" Cushing. (End Sarcasm)

    The point is that even a big name actor can act well enough to make you forget who he/she is, if he/she acts well enough. They fail with disturbing regularity, but they can also succeed.

    That said, I don't think the boys from N'Sync are up to the task.

    Virg

  228. changed for the whole industry... by congo · · Score: 1

    I saw a great episode of Frontline on PBS a while back. They talked about the entertainment industry as a whole and movies in particular. Target audience for new movies : 13-20 y.o. males.

    To quote Roger Ebert (interviewed for this show): "If you are 30yrs old and literate, they are not making movies for you, sorry."

  229. Attack of the Cloned boy bands by Torodung · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think it would be really funny if "Clone" boy bands attacked N'Sync. Maybe Boyz2men, the backstreet boys and 98 degrees could all come at them with lightsabers!

    1. Re:Attack of the Cloned boy bands by metachimp · · Score: 1

      Dude... Boys II Men was not a boy band like those. They were an R&B group.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  230. The demographic? by Cruciform · · Score: 1

    Lucas is still targeting the same demographic...
    KIDS.
    Not the generation of 20 years ago who went and saw the first movies as children.
    He's targetting TODAYS kids.
    And things like Jar Jar and NSYNC are just what little kids like.

    Sure there's stuff for the parents to enjoy as well, but this is an action/adventure series for older children / young adolescents.

    It's not OUR Star Wars. It never was. It was Lucas's all this time.

  231. As I said on Undernet's #macintosh... by athlon02 · · Score: 1

    As long as they don't start singing "Bye Bye Bye" whenever they blow up an imperial ship, it can't be *TOO* bad

  232. Not Quite. by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    No, a cameo is just the term the industry uses for "bit part" when said part goes to a well-known person. It's basically to avoid insulting a big name celebrity. For example, when Christian Slater appeared for ten seconds as a captain's lackey on "Star Trek VI: The Undiscoverd Country" it was labelled a cameo.

    Virg

  233. Bad Example by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Well, I can see why Britney Spears belongs in "Star Wars: Attack of the Clones" but there's only one Ron Jeremy.

    Virg

  234. N'Stink boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will all take turns blowing jar jar binks where he will then die from being over-sexed and then N'stink will get jar jar goo all over their faces..

  235. Star Wars Grosses in adjusted dollars by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    http://www.the-movie-times.com/thrsdir/Top10everad .html

    2 Star Wars* 1977 $461.00 $865.91
    14 The Empire Strikes Back* 1980 $290.20 $468.62
    15 Return of the Jedi* 1983 $309.10 $449.66
    16 Star Wars: The Phantom Menace 1999 $431.10 $442.15

    Surprisingly ESB is higher than ROTJ in adjusted dollars.

    On a side note gone with the wind is number one with over 1 billion domestic adjusted dollars.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  236. New movie title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that Lucas has added N Sync to the movie, he could make it a musical and call it "Send in the Clones". Now that would really get the attention of his target demographic, 13 year old girls.

    I don't think I'll even bother seeing E2, it was painful to see E1 just once. I refuse to suffer through it again.

  237. No demographic change at all. by bill_kress · · Score: 1

    >I think the target demographic for these films >has changed a little since the original trilogy.

    No it hasn't, we've just grown out of it. It's always been targetted at pre-teens and young teens, just because a bunch of geeks want to think that it's targetted at an older generation so as to not feel bad about watching it doesn't make it so.

  238. Give Lucas a LITTLE credit. by neoevans · · Score: 1

    I don't think his targetting the 12-14yr demographic is by any means selling out. After all, how many of us owned a light saber at age 12?

    More importantly, Lucas wants his series to be a classic. He wants the new-age myth of Star Wars to outlive him. Can it be that this is just Tabloid BS and Lucas isn't such an idiot to include N-SYNC?

    After all, if the series does outlive him (and the rest of us), who will remember N-SYNC in 10 years? In 2 years?

    --
    "You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake."...Tyler Durden
  239. Spaceballs and Two Words:Soft Money by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    See Above

    For lucas its merchandising! Go watch spaceballs for better comentary on that than I can give.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  240. Attack of the Clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the movie called Attack of the Clones because NSYNC is a clone of the Back Street Boys?

  241. The target demographic? by CaptTrips · · Score: 0

    I think the target demographic for these films has changed a little since the original trilogy.

    What do you mean the target demographic has changed? Star Wars has always been for and will always be for childen and adults that are young at heart. The Saga has never changed its target since the original trilogy, you just grew up and see the world from a little more mature perspective.

    --

    grep >= ! == $your
  242. Lucas created it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess he has the right to kill it....:(

  243. Cin-fulness by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    I'd say the cinema (or cinemas) in your area suck. I've been to a theatre that I really enjoy (good sound system, stadium seats that recline, big cupholders, free drink refills even on the way out, etc.) many times over three years, and the only technical flaw I encountered was a blown bulb that stopped the projector for a mere ten seconds.

    In short, go find a decent cinema. You're right to say that the crap is unacceptable.

    Virg

  244. Only one thing left to do by ShaKti · · Score: 1

    BOYcott

  245. CS Friedman would have started by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    the movie of by sacrificing JAR-JAR to some heinously evil force...Man that would have been good:) Philip K Dick could have done justice to the plot as well...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  246. This doesn't seem so bad by oooga · · Score: 1

    They play Jedi knights. That sucks, right? wrong. here's why, according to an article on salon:

    "The boy banders will play Jedi Knights in a battle scene, but will be glimpsable only on the DVD release of the film and only for a split second -- before they're blown to high heaven by a pack of bloodthirsty droids."

    Seems okay to me. I just hope it's gory.

    --
    -- Nerds on toast in the new millenium
  247. Oh! The humanity! by Nino+the+Mind+Boggle · · Score: 1

    Why did you have to remind us of that abomination! Aaaaaagh! Now I have to pour Lysol in my ears!

    Yes! It really was that horrible!

    --
    ------ "Darn floor. Big bite." (Koko the gorilla's best attempt at explaining the experience of an earthquake.)
  248. Not So by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    In the original theatrical release, Greedo didn't shoot at all. That was the part where you started seeing Han Solo as a darker character, and in the remake Lucas decided to present him as more of a "white hat" hero.

    Virg

  249. Re:Slashdot demographics vs Star Wars target audie by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2

    Goddamn it, I'm not dissing Dumbo. But you don't see a Dumbo icon on /. and you can figure out why. Since Star Wars has turned into children's entertainment, I think it has as little place on Slashdot as Dumbo.

  250. George is the good guy this time by UberQwerty · · Score: 1

    Jar-Jar sucked, and episode 1's target audience was Lucas's three adolescent adoptees. I don't like him any more. BUT

    After his 13-year-old girl bugged him to let N'SYNC guys into the movie, he showed her by putting them in a scene where they appear in the background for a fraction of a second, amidst a crowd of hundreds of others, and then get killed.

    --


    PUBLIC SPLIT ON WHETHER BUSH IS A DIVIDER -CNN scrolling banner, 10/15/2004
  251. Selling Out by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    OK, then your complaint is not why he's doing it, but that he's doing it. In this case, though, I have to ask why having the members of N*Sync as four of the extras is any different than having four equipment riggers as the extras, in terms of artistic vision. To cite a different example, in the scene in "The Sound of Music" where Julie Andrews (as Maria) approaches the convent, the real Maria von Trapp is one of the extras walking on the street. There was no reason artistically why it had to be her on the street, but there she was, and it didn't do any damage to the movie's artism. Yes, there's no reason why N*Sync band members had to be there, but how does it damage the movie? If you didn't know it was them, would you have even noticed? Therefore, I can say (at least in this case), no harm, no foul. He's sold out in many ways, but this is a bad example.

    Virg

    1. Re:Selling Out by undecidable · · Score: 1

      I actually do care why he is doing it. If he honestly thought that injecting 'NSYNC into a scene would make his work better, then I'm proud that he did it. I may not like the result, but perhaps someone else recognizes his genius and loves it.

      However, I simply find it hard to believe that he's doing this to improve his work. I believe he is doing this to improve the marketabity of the film. That is what rubs me the wrong way. The fact that I believe he is adding something gratuitous to the film that I dislike.

      As far as "sell out cameo appearances" go, this is not a bad example. In fact, this is a killer example. I'm confident that the director of "The Sound of Music" included the real Maria von Trapp in a scene not because he wished to ingratiate a particular demographic, but because he wanted to pay homage to an important figure in the movie, and the movie was the better for it.

      Additionally, I would argue that this is not a "no harm, no foul" example. Again, Lucas is likely injecting a cameo appearance by 'NSYNC to improve the marketability of the film. But to benifit from this, we, the future audience, must know about this for it to pay off. Thus, the announcement. So not only is it annoyingly gratuitous, but well advertised.

      --
      "The only rights you have are the rights you are willing to fight for."
  252. A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be to have Britney Spears in one of those dancing girl outfist in Jabba's palace.

  253. I REMEMBER THIS!!! by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1

    Finally, someone clued me in to what this Wookie-TV memory is that has been haunting me.

    Yes, my earliest memory of television was Wookies standing around talking. This has been haunting me for years about what the hell that was. After all, Star Wars was a movie. Why did I have memories of Wookies on TV? And after all... how did I know that Chewbacca had two kid Wookies?

    All I remember about this (after all, I was four at the time) was the fact that Wookies had families in big trees, and that they came in other shades of brown instead of Chewbacca brown.

    I don't remember the rest, because MY MOM TURNED OFF THE TV. I was sitting there watching the show in my Star Wars PJs and she turned it off. I remember I was rather disappointed.

    Apparently, as I just found out today reading the articles, THERE WAS A REASON FOR THAT. Actually, a very funny, ridiculous reason for that. My sister went upstairs and watched it. Looks like I'll have to ask her how bad it was.

    Thanks... I feel better. I laughed when I though about my mom turning off the TV.

  254. I think I'm going to vomit by BlizzardGroupie · · Score: 1

    I read as many of the responses to this article as I could, but the overwhelming urge to vomit was difficult to withstand. Why?

    Because the people of this forum make me sick sometimes.

    Now, it's not everyone so don't get all defensive on me. The majority of posters on /. seem to have a simple-minded approach to everything in this world. They believe the world and everything in it revolves around them. The world should serve them and bend to their will. If they don't like something, then it sucks. Or it's a monopoly. Or it's a sign of an egomaniac. Or it's a marketing ploy. Please...Spare me the time to read the crap spewing from your keyboard.

    Feel free to rate this post as a troll or flamebait, but you'll simply be supporting my argument, so it's up to you. I won't waste any more time on this argument than I already have, but I had to get it off my chest.

    Now on to my real comments about the article.

    N'SYNC is a marketing ploy by Lucas because (he's an egomaniac) | (he's lost touch with his demographic) | (he's a sellout) | (he's a terrible writer).

    Ack...do you believe this junk? It's a part worthy of an extra. If it truly is something that you can blink-and-miss (as the UK article states), then they won't be talking. They can hardly be called acting. If it's a marketing ploy that's aimed to attract an audience that wouldn't normally watch a Star Wars movie, then why do we know that it's a part for an extra? Why didn't Lucas hide this fact? Why is the part so small to begin with? People of the N'SYNC fanclub age are not ignorant or stupid. They wouldn't be fooled by something as obvious as this.

    I guess this begs the question as to why they are there in it in the first place. The UK article states that Lucas did it as a favor to his daughter. Damn, I think that makes Lucas at least a decent Dad. I'd do something like this for my daughter as long as it doesn't compromise the movie (if a two-second thing compromises a movie for you...you've got problems). What if the UK article is wrong?

    I'm sure we can come up with other reasons. Hollywood is, after all, a rather large "business" of sorts. Businessmen do call in favors from time to time. I think this qualifies as something resembling a favor that is being done. After all, I remember reading an article that said Samuel Jackson was in Ep1 because he was a huge fan and asked for a part. Samuel Jackson's popularity still ran high in the previous years with hits such as Pulp Fiction, Die Hard 3, and The Negotiator. Not exactly movies that "geeky" Star Wars and low-budget Sci-Fi fans are known to watch, are they? But was there any controversy over this inclusion? I don't recall any. Nevermind the fact that you may like Jackson and not N'SYNC (as I'm sure is true of most of us). It's the principle that matters here. It is said that Jackson's role is expanded in Ep2. Good for him. He is a great actor and deserves it.

    There's a lot of heresay involved in this speculation on both my part and that of the /.ers. It's possible that some of this information is wrong. If the part of N'SYNC resembles something requiring acting skills, then we would all have right to be pissed. If an N'SYNC song appeared on the soundtrack, we would have a right to be pissed. If some sort of cross-promotional LucasFilm N'SYNC thing appeared, we'd all be pissed. But at this moment in time, you are simply fuming over nothing.

    NOTHING...

    This thread isn't about the Phantom Menace and whether or not it's good, so I won't spend a lot of time on it either. Personally, I thought it was a fine film. Maybe in 10 years, it's popularity will boost from nostalgic value, too. I felt it did an excellent job of introducing what will become Darth Vader. I think Lucas did a great job of giving us a glimpse in to what the universe was like during the height of the Jedi; something many fans dreamed about. I recently watched it again and I found myself anticipating Ep2 even more now.

    Finally, I read someone's post knocking the name Attack of the Clones. Please. As if The Empire Strikes Back or Return of the Jedi were more creative and inspired. The Star Wars expanded universe talks about the Clone Wars a lot. The title alludes to a focus on the Clone Wars (which ties in to the attempt at Jedi extinction). Sounds like Attack of the Clones is an excellent title for Ep2.

    --
    /* No comment */
  255. no girls girls that would see a movie for nsync by ebbv · · Score: 1


    regardless you won't find me in line for this piece of shit.

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  256. The problem today... by Odinson · · Score: 2
    Nobody goes all the way.


    If you have to populate the movie theatre with teenage girls to get the numbers you want then fine. If nsync is is in the movie, then every clone should be a member of nsync.


    Tell me that wouldn't be ironic, funny and growing Darth Vader evil. The woodeness of their acting should be directly proportional to the number of clones killed. If it isn't funny enough than make more boy bands into clones and kill them. Nuke a whole planet if you have to. The teeny booper girls will be happy and the geeks/dweeb/fans_for_more_than_five_minutes will just have to laugh if you take it far enough.


    Different people should get different things out of a good movie. I think episode 1 was a little too one size fits all. How many good kids cartoons have hidden adult humor or perversion.


    thunder, Thunder, Thunder Cats HOOOOOOOO!!!


    Hey Nsync, embrace the dark side, you will more powerfull than you could possibly imagine.

  257. Hey, it could be worse. by KhanReaper · · Score: 1

    At least Lucas has enough sense not to have Blink 182 or some stupid whiny kiddies involved with the movie.

    Why is Star Wars targeted at young ninnies nowadays?

    I dunno.

    I think Lucas is screwing with a large dedicated audience by embeding such kiddy nonsense like Jar Jar Binks, etc.

    --
    Even the Politburo concurs with Process of Elimination http://process-of-elimination.net
    1. Re:Hey, it could be worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's the difference between nsync and blink 182?

  258. Re:Umm, right. And Mark Hamill was from where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who?

  259. NSYNC in EPISODE II by ph0tek · · Score: 1

    just saw it in the news ... you can see'em somwhere in the background and thay are beeing blown up (not a joke !!!) ... yeah, alwas wanted to see those guy's explode ;)

  260. Sex? Well there was Leia getting licked at by Jabba in a gold bikini.... not exactly the Red Shoe Diaries....

    As for the violence, I can't think properly because that damn JUB-JUB ewok song is haunting me. Jub jub. I'm telling you, there were plush toy sales figures dancing in the eyes of whoever designed the ewoks.

    Jub-jub.

    --
    m00.
  261. Dialouge in princess bride by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    is Very sharply written. The dialouge certainly can be taken on a more "adult" level as well while children will appreciate the story.

    Thats how you do a family movie everyone will enjoy, not just a kids movie.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  262. Artistic Reasoning by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > I believe he is doing this to improve the marketabity of the film.
    > That is what rubs me the wrong way. The fact that I believe he is adding
    > something gratuitous to the film that I dislike.


    Therein lies the rub, indeed. What you believe is coloring your view of what's happening. Your problem seems to stem from the idea of using celebrities (in this case, ones you feel are inappropriate) as extras. I disagree with your reasoning here, because using celebrities (or anyone in particular, for that matter) does not fall under the artistic intent of the film. It does not stand to reason that there is no neutrality in artistic intent. Your claim is that anything that does not improve the film necessarily hurts it. By this logic, since adding N*Sync members does not improve the film, it must hurt it. Adding them in this role is plot-neutral, and so no harm. You don't know for certain why he did it, so you can't claim that he's doing it solely to improve marketability. He likely realizes that it will help marketability, but might be doing it for personal or artistic or whatever reasons. Hell, he might actually like their music, for all anyone knows. So, no foul.

    To give you food for thought, how do you think you (and many other Slashdotters who have complained) would have felt if he recruited extras from members of his family? Or to Star Trek cast members, or anyone you choose that doesn't annoy you? Be careful that it's not merely the fact that it's a band that appeals to teenage girls that annoys you.

    Virg

    1. Re:Artistic Reasoning by undecidable · · Score: 1

      I searched google to dig up this definition of "artistic intent":
      DEFINITION OF ARTISTIC INTENT: Artistic Intent is the premeditated effort to express or promote certain ideas or emotions through the work being done. In order for those intentions to be artistic, they must stay to true to the artist. If an artist creates with intent to sell or commercialize, then the artistic intent is lost and the art cannot exist.
      Sounds right to me, but then
      I disagree with your reasoning here, because using celebrities (or anyone in particular, for that matter) does not fall under the artistic intent of the film.
      doesn't really make much sense. Can you rephrase this?

      Adding them ('NSYNC) in this role is plot-neutral, and so no harm.
      But the plot is just one of many aspects of a film. Sure, the plot remains unchanged, but that is not at all the issue at hand.

      You don't know for certain why he did it, so you can't claim that he's doing it solely to improve marketability. He likely realizes that it will help marketability, but might be doing it for personal or artistic or whatever reasons.
      I've never claim otherwise. In fact I've been rather careful to point this out. I'm not sure why you are pointing this out as well. However, given the evidence that we do have, you must admit that I'm not exactly championing a bizarre theory. What do you honestly think the odds are that Lucas believes that a scene with 'NSYNC is true to his original vision? Unfortunately, we may never really know the truth since I don't ever expect Lucas to admit to what I suspect.

      Hell, he might actually like their music, for all anyone knows.
      But even then, that's no reason to throw the performers into his movie.
      To give you food for thought, how do you think you (and many other Slashdotters who have complained) would have felt if he recruited extras from members of his family? Or to Star Trek cast members, or anyone you choose that doesn't annoy you? Be careful that it's not merely the fact that it's a band that appeals to teenage girls that annoys you.
      It would all depend on who they are and how I feel about them. You seem to think that that's a problem; that we should forget everything that we know about the actors, and perhaps also about the places and things in a film and watch it in a vacuum. But it is exactly those experiences which connect us to the artist.

      If I happened to have special knowledge that the director did not intend which influenced my perception of the film, then I would need to respect the director's artistic intent, and pretend that I didn't have that special knowledge while watching the film.

      But I'm pretty sure that Lucas is aware that most of his audience will know 'NSYNC: this is not special knowledge.

      --
      "The only rights you have are the rights you are willing to fight for."
  263. Opening credits will read... by T3KL3R · · Score: 1

    Right about now, in a creativeless Hollywood really really saturated with shallow taste and manipulated markets...

  264. Hans Christian Anderson & Bros. Grimm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are fairy tales. They didn't commercialize their stories or date them by putting in pandering evanescent pop icons. They just crafted great stories. I wish Lucas would have styed true to that. And I am glad Jackson with LOTR has. I know which movie I'll be watching and recommending.

  265. Is that a post? by Suburban+nmate · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, maybe I'm missing something here...

    This and Episode 1 = crap cash-in movies, no shortage of them, so why on /. ?

    And did the ModoratorZ even notice that the link is the link in the article? +5 huh... So thats a 'no' then.

    Ali

    Negative karma, here I come!! Wheeeee...

    --
    "Windows and Linux can co-exist on the same machine." - Microsoft Corporation.
  266. Pathetic by restive · · Score: 1

    Just my $.02 but this doesn't seem like something you would do if you want this movie to have long-term appeal. Something as "classic" as the Star Wars series doesn't need dated pop-appeal N'Sync.

    I will not be going to watch this in the theater after hearing this. A quick poll throughout my local "geek network" confirmed that others felt the same way.

    Lucas, you've sold out.

  267. Star wars should have been left alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given Ep.1 ('nuff said), the fact that slush writters were contracted to write the script for Ep.1 through 3, the extremely childish trailers and now the inclusion of N'SYNC, I have absolutely now intention of paying for this movie.

    I'll nab it off IRC.
    I'll watch it once, and I'll likely never watch it again.

    You don't get my dollars George, enjoy fitting the bill for Ep.3 on your own.

  268. Targeted Audience by darthsheep · · Score: 1

    I'm 16 years old. I first saw the Star Wars movies when they were re-released in the movie theaters and I remember how great I thought they were. Then when Episode 1 was released I went to see it and was dissapointed by everything but the battle scenes. Jar-Jar Binks was not funny, the little kid sucked, the movie as a whole was nothing like the first movies. I posted this to prove that the movies have changed, not the audience.

  269. star wars fan fade away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a shot through the heart of all old school star wars fans. Jar Jar could have been taken as a mistake, but the nsync thing really breaks my enthusiasm for any more work from Mr. Lucas.

  270. TPM wasn't that bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't about betrayal, this is about Lucas not wanting to create a movie that reflects your (and many slashdotters) cynical sensibilities.

  271. In space, no one can hear you fart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so they're all SBD...

  272. mest up shi0t..... by $goat+man$ · · Score: 0

    if this is true, then i have lost all faith in the world. what has it come to when i can't even have a little two hour escape without some commercial-pop-shit being rammed down my throat...be assured that my drinks/popcorn/knives are being thrown at the silver screen the moment one of those no-talent fucks steps on the scene....
    PS> at least Amidala looks hotter in this one ;)

  273. trivial crap by ncstockguy · · Score: 1

    This is trivial crap. Slashdot is supposed to be stuff that matters. Who the hell cares about the cast of the new Star Wars, without seeing the movie then deciding? I was kinda hoping they'd feature Michael Jackson somewhere in there, myself.

  274. Don't expect just a few seconds in the background. by Ayatollah · · Score: 1

    This is what they call testing the waters. When the marketing team finds out just how much of the band we can stomach before they start to see a decrease in projected revenue, they will reach a balance between drawing in the new market and losing the devoted fan segment.

    I am predicting there will be dialogue from at least one of the band members, and multiple shots within this scene, all vaguely desgined to not interfere with the story.

  275. Natalie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and now Natalie quits and is replace by a singing Brittany Spears. K3W1!

  276. That Holiday Special... by KingJawa · · Score: 1

    I own a copy of it. And it sucks.

    Bad.

    But the fact of the matter is that the Bea Arthur, Jefferson Airplane Starship Starship, and Diahann Carroll appearances don't help it. It still sucks. Apparently it has since it came out -- which is why it's so hard to find.

    If N'Sync wants to have something to do with Star Wars, then they can -- it's called a music video. Yeah, like Cyndi Lauper's that rode the Goonies coattails. Lucas/N'Sync can sell each video for $10 to the teenyboppers. But come on -- if you need to put N'Sync in the movie itself....

    Dear god, I'm going to waste $20 on this movie.

    1. Re:That Holiday Special... by batboy78 · · Score: 1

      Next you will see NSYNC on the soundtrack instead of John Williams..... ohhh the humanity

  277. Brothers and Star Wars by Cable · · Score: 0
    We got ahold of PVC foam tubes and wacked each other silly with them. Nothing like welt marks on your face. Those baby teeth had to come out anyway. More money from the "Tooth Fairy".


    Then we went to war with the "Action Figures". Han Solo lost his head, Princess Leia had her boobs blown off, a Stormtrooper got a Colonoscopy with an M80, R2D2 got a few bottlerockets on him and he almost made orbit before the reports blew him up, etc. Whatever parts got left over we built new figures out of them. Then later when I grew up, I wished I kept those action figures in their original packaging instead of bowing them up or selling them at garage sales. :(

  278. Attack of the clones? by Cable · · Score: 0

    The "Boy bands" are all clones of each other. The other boy bands may be in Stormtrooper gear? ;)

  279. What could make this more ironic? by matticus · · Score: 1

    As i viewed this post, this is what I saw:
    How much more freaky can it get?

  280. Princess Bride is not for kids! by FastT · · Score: 2

    What the hell are you talking about, The Princess Bride being a kids movie? The Princess Bride is a spoof on fairy tales, ala Shrek, though aimed at an older, more intelligent crowd, and IMHO far superior. The Princess Bride is a masterpiece of engaging story telling and genre twisting satire. Children may like the movie for a number of reasons, but certainly can't grasp the irony, satire, and deep humor in most of the dialogue.

    If you doubt me, read Goldman's book by the same name. It's a surpringly different experience, and you'll clearly see that the seemingly sentimental emotions in the movie are far more adult-oriented than come across on screen.

    --

    The only certainty is entropy.
  281. great disturbance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I felt a great disturbance in the force. It was as if millions of souls cried out all at once.

  282. If you don't like it ... by ElusiveSpoon · · Score: 0

    Go to the Jedi Council and ask Rick McCallum to digitally edit out any members of NSYNC appearing in Episode II.

  283. is Britney Spears involved too? by lunatech3007 · · Score: 1

    If Lucas has asked nsync(or vice versa) has he asked britney Spears /JLO to join the cast too?

  284. I'm not a geek but I'm offended by dazed118 · · Score: 1

    I'm an attractive female gamer (rare breed, eh?) and I was pissed as hell to hear (from Tuesday's foxtrot comic of all places) Nsync is in ep2...I just about cried...I do believe it's a sign of the biblical apocalypse...there's no two ways around it...pop culture crud doesn't belong in the epic that is Ep 2...and now I'm going back to playing Rogue Leader...it's as close to undeluded Star Wars as I can get in 10 minute doses...