Slashdot Mirror


Most Outrageous Vendor Lie Ever Told?

i8msft writes "CIO published a guide on How To Cut Through Vendor Hype. While light, the article did prompt me to wonder what is the most outrageous lie ever told by a vendor? I mean, in person, face to face, preferably with witnesses (boss, coworkers, someone on your side of the fence). Forget press releases, trade show presentations and the like, where they lie like dogs! Specific examples only, please."

1,278 comments

  1. My Vote: by JoeLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Duke Nukem will be out by the end of the year. No, we promise. Not lying this time!"

    JoeLinux

    1. Re:My Vote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that

      Also

      Tiberian Sun was at least 5 years overdue, IIRC

    2. Re:My Vote: by Magila · · Score: 1, Redundant

      How about: "Daikatana won't suck. We swear!"

    3. Re:My Vote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about one of the biggest lies of recent years:

      MySQL... According to the vendor, it's a real database and you don't need transaction support or referential integrity.

    4. Re:My Vote: by gazbo · · Score: 5, Funny
      No, the biggest lie I've ever been sold is anything of the form
      Slashdotted, here is a mirror
    5. Re:My Vote: by coolgeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'll never get an "Unrecoverable Application Error" in Windows 95.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    6. Re:My Vote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you don't for everything. Most things you do though.

    7. Re:My Vote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "A Macintosh version of Babylon 5: Into The Fire will be available simultaneously with the PC release at the end of 1999."
      "A Macintosh version of Half Life will be available shortly after the PC release."
      "A Macintosh version of Tribes 2 will be available shortly after the PC release."

    8. Re:My Vote: by bigredtint · · Score: 1

      Never can anyone say anything regarding sleazyness until one watches local television for more than five minutes. From my tv eminates these adverts "pentium computers $200". First of all this is a blatent rip-off, the product being advertised being only worth about $5 tops (before the flames begin, assuming anybody actually reads this, I can go to the yearly governmental computer auction and purchase these computers as complete systems for aprox $5, and that is with the auctioneer's plants amoungst the audience). Besides the extravagent pricing, the misrepresentation is deceptive to say the least, pentium being used as an industry buzzword for ages, a consumer one moreso over the past few years. With the advent of these buzzwords, we think pentium we think computer, no differnce existing from one to the next besides maybe case shape. So technically these are pentiums that are being sold, but the misinformed public is looking for a p-2 at least (windows must be run, people think computer they think windows) they are really recieveing lemons who's bios batteries will most likely die within the year, soldered straight onto the motherboard even. Ok I do admit the post got slightly long, but who cares, it's not like anybody cares what I have to say anways, the average user's threshold will filter me out before long...

    9. Re:My Vote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, if all you need is a guest book for your website then you don't need them. But then, you don't need the bloat of MySql for that either.

    10. Re:My Vote: by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      I care.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    11. Re:My Vote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally heard the CTO of this company promise that this firewall would essentially solve all network security problems and almost anything else you want (excluding world hunger) almost one year ago. He said it would be done last summer. The product page hasn't change a word in that time either. Don't believe me, check the way back machine.

    12. Re:My Vote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Me Too!

      Seriously, that was a pretty good comment. Now if I ever need a wimpy computer, I'll know where to look.

    13. Re:My Vote: by JustAnotherReader · · Score: 1

      Modded to a 5 funny!?? For a goatse.cx link? Geez Oh Petes, Please meta-moderate this down

    14. Re:My Vote: by Graemee · · Score: 1

      THE that's roman numerials for "when hell freezes"

    15. Re:My Vote: by majestyk2000 · · Score: 1

      I think the ads like you are referring to are simply an obvious manifestation of the 'ignorance tax'. That's the same thing that allows a computer repair shop to charge $50 to install a $10 memory chip, $95 to install an operating system, or $100+ to remove a virus with Norton. If someone isn't going to inform themselves about their purchases, then someone else is entitled to tax them for it. You and I know those are $5 machines, but the average person doesn't, and they're going to get taken. Too bad.

    16. Re:My Vote: by connorbd · · Score: 2

      I know someone who bought one of those. It was a P2/450, an IBM with an LPX mobo. It wasn't really a bad computer at all; IMHO he only overpaid to the tune of $100 for it. It did need a new CD-ROM, though.

      /Brian

    17. Re:My Vote: by andy200002 · · Score: 1

      Hooray

  2. You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    We have it deployed at our office. It's stable, easy to maintain, and nobody ever manages to break it.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're running red hat 8.0 .. SMOOOOOOOOTH

      Also we are a unix development shop, so it would be silly to use Windows

    2. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by oktokie · · Score: 0

      You silly boy!
      Windows does not have built in capability to logon. Windows merely lets you share a file system and that's about all it does. That's why windows system admin is always on the run...looking for desktop's location. Now, that's silly.

      Oktokie

    3. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Where are you getting your stupid information?

      "yeah. escept for the fact that windows fucking sucks to administer" -- Are you kidding? I don't even have to go to a command prompt to fix anybody's problem with 2K!

      "you sell your soul to artificial boundaries they create" -- I've never said "Gee, I can't do that." in Win2k. Sounds like you've never used it.

      "why do you think you have to reboot 8000 times?" -- With Windows NT, you had to reboot every time you did a network change etc, I agree with you there. 2k is not like that. I haven't rebooted my computers at home, or my computers at work (2 each) in over a week. Gee, I guess I'm not rebooting '8000 times'. I won't even reboot 800 times by the time the year is over.

      Maybe you should try doing a little research before you spout off anti-MS garbage at me. So far, you just sound like an idiot.

    4. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by cscx · · Score: 1

      Windows does not have built in capability to logon.

      Hmm... looks like the moron bus decided to stop at /. for a pit stop. Ever used NT? Maybe the SAM database is just a fairy tale...

    5. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try doing SP2 and windows update and the .net update and see how many times you reboot. as far as not having a command prompt you ahve to go and check each stupid w2k system manually because its not a multiuser system.

    6. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by WildBeast · · Score: 2

      Ever heard of SMS? If not, you can always write a Perl, Python, VB, ASP, PHP, Java script to check each w2k system.

    7. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft released a tool to help minimize the number of reboots when apply hotfixes.

      http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=k b; EN-US;q296861

      Microsoft also released a tool (scaled down version of a commercial product) that scans your system and determines what hotfixes/security updates may be needed.

      http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=k b; EN-US;q303215

    8. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by painkillr · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you've never run unix. You might've known that he was referring logging on via telnet/ssh/whatever.

      If someday, you get let out of your cage and you get to admin some unix boxes, you'll see what a sad sad story remote administration of windows is.

      Heh, i predict that right about now, you're going, "vnc, pcanywhere, blah, blah, blah" Fuck off. Just trust me when I say that you don't know what real remote administration is.

    9. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Don't you think this is a little over the top, nerd? You need to find a girlfriend.

    10. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by MeowMeow+Jones · · Score: 2

      When you build the machine:

      Copy rcmdsvc under system32
      cmd
      c:\winnt\system32 rcmdsvc -install
      sc config rcmdsvc start= auto
      sc start rcmdsvc

      problem solved.

      --

      Trolls throughout history:
      Jonathan Swift

    11. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a time traveller from the future? Red Hat just released 7.3 as a beta.

    12. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by cscx · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you've never run Windows 2000. You might've known that it comes with a telnet server.

      If someday, you get let out of your cage and you get to admin some Windows boxes, you'll see what a sad sad story remote administration of *nix is.

      Right now I'm going, "Terminal Services, blah, blah, blah." Fuck off. Just trust me when I say that you don't know what real remote administration is.

    13. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, a girlfriend will beat him down, teach him that conformance and subservience to the almighty pussy is paramount, and that only popular things are good so use ms for everything.

    14. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by painkillr · · Score: 1

      Heh, that's funny, jackass.

      Tell me how you change dns server settings from the command line in 2k? Or how about this one. What's the equivalent of 'ps -ef' in 2k from the cli? You know what even funnier? When you look at the list of processes, you don't know what files you're looking at. You only know the name of the executable!

      Don't argue that the remote admin in NT/2k/XP, is better than in unix. It's an argument you will lose. Loser.

    15. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Don't you think this is a little over the top, nerd? You need to find a girlfriend."

      Wow, what a witty reply. So what's it like being a graduate of the Bob Saget School of Comedy?

      I can't believe how fast this turns into a "Win2k sucks" thread. The funny thing is that the people that are bashing 2k don't appear to have used it much. For some reason 'changing dns via command line' is an important feature. Maybe it is. But I do the system administration for all the 2k boxes in my office. Once they were set up (easy to do), they were up and running. Everybody is still running. I don't have people walking into my office saying 'Uhh I think I broke it' like they did constantly with Windows 98 or 95.

      In any case, this whole debate is stupid. 2K is a far better system for most of the users in most offices than Linux. I'm not criticizing Linux so much as pointing out that MS was made for the office types. Linux is easily a better server. Questions about which is better to administer seems rather academic, doesn't it? I could sit here and say that Win2k is far easier to administer for this reason and that reason, but I use it every single day! I don't know Linux so I can't say it's better or it's not. I do like that in Windows I can tell somebody over the phone how to do something like change their gateway. No big deal. I've tried to do commandline stuff over the phone before, and it doesn't work so well.

      So put this stupid debate to rest, okay? Win2k is not a bad OS by any stretch of the imagination. Look at what it does do instead of judging it for something it doesn't do that you think you need it to. The average Linux user doesn't have the same needs as the average Windows user. It's hard to imagine they'd both need to do the exact same things if they're not for the same type of people, isn't it?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    16. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      When you lose the argument miserably, just try to claim that "both sides are right, there shouldn't even be an argument like this". After all, this is what people are indoctrinated with in school here -- makes a great society of happy, unthinking sheep who would never question dominant religion, be interested in philosophy or -- completely impossible -- devise an original thought and be able to act on it, defend it in an argument, and achieve anything.

      The fact is, it's even in theory impossible for Windows to get a decent remote, or automated system administration -- the lack of design pretty much condemned this system to have all "features" bolted on, implemented by monkeys (because anyone with a human brain would choke on his own puke after trying to develop this), with interoperability problems being solved by constant replacement of everything with Microsoft software, and protocols being replaced by thin wrappers to underdesigned "object model" of COM and its descendants. How recognizably sheepish -- don't try to apply any original thought, use Microsoft tools, and other Microsoft tools will do predefined actions using carefully collected set of interfaces that look like an explosion on a spaghetti factory.

      I don't know, what your office of 17 does -- maybe it calculates optimal duration of the amber light, to maximize fines, commercially-collected with automated cameras. Maybe it makes late-night advertisements for "money making schemes". Maybe it even does something more useful. But very likely, it doesn't need computers in the first place, and it's possible that whatever good it made in its history, is negated by the amount of money it paid to Microsoft. Those money without any doubt will be used to make sure that people like you will never know what software exists now, that is far superior to what they are doing, and will force people to abandon the development of everything but VB interfaces to Microsoft's own software. Because Microsoft can do with bullshit more than anyone can do with bombs and guns. What brings us back to the topic of this discussion -- Microsoft is either the world leader in commercial bullshit, or the company that created most amount of harm using this bullshit.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    17. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "When you lose the argument miserably, just try to claim that "both sides are right, there shouldn't even be an argument like this"."

      I never miserably lost an argument. It's not a very good agrument when people argue over points that have little relevance to the topic at hand. 'It doesn't do remote automation'. Okay, for that Linux wins. 'Win2k sucks as a webserver' yep, Linux wins. 'You can't even change DNS from a command prompt.' So? What's the big deal? use your mouse. That's the problem with Linux, you can't get at some of the features of it so easily with a mouse. You have to find the right command to type in. Sorry, but some of us think that really sucks. You can use Win2k without a manual.

      In any case, your arguments against 2K, whether they are true or not, don't affect the fact that Win2k is an awesome desktop OS for the average office user. It also excels at being a 3D workstation for artists like me. I've already said that it's deployed where I work, and it works wonderfully. Some of it is for software development, some of it is for PowerPoint and Email. *shrug*

      We paid a lot for it. But I don't regret it. It was easy to install on the wide variety of computer hardware we have, and I haven't had to fix a Windows related problem in ages.

      The simple fact is that Windows 2000 is a good desktop OS and a great 3D Workstation Os. I have a great deal of experience with both, and virtually no horror stories to tell. Considering that I can't afford computer crashes during rendering, that's saying a lot.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    18. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think once you get out of detox you ought to go back and re-read the previous posts.

      I agree with most of your original post but you seem to be incapable or unwilling to discuss some of the weak points of your assertions.

    19. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Are you vying for "most outrageous lie ever told"?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    20. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by the_chr0n1c · · Score: 0

      Agreed! How often do you need to change DNS? If you did, on a Win2K box 6 or 7 key strokes later AND USER IS DONE. If I had to oversee every minor change on a box, I would not have time to do the real job, reading /. I know all admin's are control freaks. We have to be. Spend you time controlling the things that really matter. Like what IIS exploit I have to address this week. ;-}

      --
      Another essential factor in "control" is to conceal from the controlled the actual intentions of the controllers. -WSB
    21. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I guess that why all the big animation houses are moving to Win2k...oh wait, there moving to Linux.
      I use win2k, ang its the best OS ms has made.

      The command line argument, in general, is a waste. true Command lines are faster the mouse commands, but as long as you can do what needs to be done(in this case DNS) its fine.
      The root of that complaint is the fact that is something goes wrong, MS GUI's a notoriously bad at handling it, and you end up rebooting. However in Linux if something mucks up the GUI, you can still use the computer without rebooting.
      For you that means if your in the middle of rendoring and your GUI has a problem, you can go to command line, retart or fix the GUI and your background process is still running.
      Out of all the #D workstatins, Win 2k is down towards the bottom. Considering its competotirs, Even being on the map is a good thing.

      FYI I've installed several differnet Linux distros on wildly different PC, never had a problem.

      However, if I did 3d rendering, or any CPU intensive work, it would be nice to be able to recompile it specifically for the processor and machine config I'm using.

      Initial money is really irrelevent to WIN2k/Linux discussions, however, the money your going to keep spending to stay with the MS sofware is something that needs to be addressed by any company, perferable annually.
      Only in the MS world would 2 years with an OS be considered "a great deal of experience".

      I've been using Linux for years, and I've never had to fix a windows related problem!

      Just a little levity in case this post seems to critical.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      " guess that why all the big animation houses are moving to Win2k...oh wait, there moving to Linux."

      This is a hard number to quantify. The really big movie studios are using Linux for the network rendering. Let me reemphasize this, NETWORK RENDERING. This is not the same as actually developing the animation. I think Final Fantasy was mostly developed on Macs and PCs, and sent off to the Linux farm for rendering. This doesn't negate what you're saying, but rather it indicates that OSX and Win2k are useful in this area. It is my understanding that the animators are given the OS they know how to use. It also costs $12,000 per seat to get Maya. Interestingly enough, the desktop machines did rendering overnight as well. (This might have been Shrek.. I watched the making of on both these movies too close together...)

      That's a little prohibitive for a medium sized Game Company or Television FX studio. The majority of these two businesses use either 3D Studio MAX or Lightwave. Neither of these two progams are available in Linux. If Win2k was as bad as some of the people here believe, then these companies would sooner buy Maya seats than rely on Win2K to handle their rendering.

      Getting back to the topic at hand, MS promised greater stability with Win2k, and they easily delivered that. That's the only point I'm trying to make, if you sift back to the top of this thread, heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    23. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't know, what your office of 17 does -- maybe it calculates optimal duration of the amber light, to maximize fines, commercially-collected with automated cameras
      Hi! My previous "office of 17" wrote and supported time and billing software to 4 of the top 5 (worldwide) accountancy firms. The payroll software was singlehandedly maintained by a team of one (which included the IR(S)' evil regular tax regulation changes), the main billing software by a team of 2, and some new thin-client shit done by me, earning the company some big-$ international sales (I got to fly around the world too to help with installs woooooo).

      So, goathead, don't diss the small office. A well organised team of 17 can do more than a badly organised team of 100.

      Oh, and I left to finish off a maths degree. A hard degree being something many of the self-proclaimed geniuses on /. seem to be badly lacking.

  3. Re:What is CIO? by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Cheif Information Officer
    or something like that...

  4. One Word... by Moonshadow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Daikatana.

    1. Re:One Word... by GearheadX · · Score: 1

      I think this one wins hand down in the gaming lies category. Daikatana has to be one of the most overhyped, underpowered, broken and wrong pieces of gaming software I've seen in a long time. But... What about other vendor lies, outside the realm of games?

    2. Re:One Word... by Xacid · · Score: 1

      But hey, it has a cool looking box so that makes it all ok, right?

    3. Re:One Word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, Daikatana. Previewed in the first ever issue of PC Accelerator magazine, and previewed in the last ever issue of PC Accelerator magazine. PCXL, where art thou?

    4. Re:One Word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Um, is there anyone posting on this thread who has any experience with enterprise-wide implementations and IT projects, instead of just helpdesks, desktop OS's and computer games? I mean, I know that Slashdot has largely a college and entry-level-monkey following, but I thought there were some people with a little more background out there.

      Just about every service provider I have had to deal with has done some sort of bait-and-switch number on me. IBM was a big disappointment in that regard. I can't give away too many details, but they pretty much lied through their teeth, promising to outfit one of our development groups with a certain type of system (specifically, Thinkpads with nVidia chips) in order to become our main hardware vendor - and we're still waiting.

    5. Re:One Word... by rewster · · Score: 1

      The story behind Daikatana is actually pretty interesting to read, Knee Deep in a dream: The story of Daikatana.

    6. Re:One Word... by Associate · · Score: 1

      I can't say much either, but the semi they were in probably got stollen to be used to smuggle illegal aliens across the border from Mexico. The Laptops, being added weight, probably got dumped into the Rio Grande. But this is just a guess, and I'm a jilted former IBM'er.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    7. Re:One Word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it ever cross your mind not to accept delivery of something you didn't order? That'd solve the bait and switch problem. That worked for me.

      Failing that get yourself a Big Bad Lawyer.

    8. Re:One Word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's not the way it works. We order IBM for the enterprise - most of the enterprise doesn't need the nVidia chip, but by going with IBM as an exclusive, we get big discounts. IBM is vaporwaring their nVidia chip (they'll be here "any time now." We *could* have made the bulk acquisition deal with another vendor, but by sourcing IBMs for the rest of the company, we're stuck with either waiting or paying full price to another vendor (and dealing with assorted support issues - hardware and the like - of having more than one vendor in the company). Yes, perhaps, someday lawyers will be involved, but once you go down that route you better be ready to finish it that way.

      I get the feeling that you don't really know much about the way things work.

    9. Re:One Word... by sandman935 · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you never tried WWII Online.

      --

      Defecation occurs.
    10. Re:One Word... by szap · · Score: 1

      Yeap, and Penny Arcade agrees:

      Funny All By Itself

  5. Mandrake by athakur999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mandrake, regarding the Mandrake Club:

    "All membership levels enjoy the same benefits."

    Now it's "almost the same benefits".

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    1. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Oh get off it. The whole point of the Mandrake Club in the first place was to allow contributions. If you contribute and get something in return, all the better. If you contribute even more and get even more in return, well heck, that's even better.

    2. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I was told I'd get some stuff. That's why I did it... then they go and change the terms. I'd prefer a refund - it's the only moral thing for Mandrake to do.

    3. Re:Mandrake by jeffehobbs · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer a refund - it's the only moral thing for Mandrake to do.

      Dear CheapSkate Pro,

      What are you out, $5.00? Like you were really planning to use StarOffice anyhow. I've had shitty meals at McDonalds, but the stakes are so low, I don't expect a refund there. Get over it; maybe you can write it off on your taxes next year as a charitable donation.

      ~jeff
      Like you were really planning to use StarOffice anyhow.

    4. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually I don't know why people keep saying this but it only works out to be $5/month when you break it up - you actually pay $60/year as a lump sum. So I'm out $60(US). That's one weeks rent for me.

      I require database guff of Staroffice - stuff that openoffice doesn't have. Mandrake had months of notice without changing the statement that all members would get staroffice. I was planning to use it. This sucks.

    5. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you out, $5.00?

      Very minimal research would have enabled you to find out the minimum cost was $60. I think it's reasonable to assume that you didn't pay anything yourself or you'd have at least some inkling of the costs involved.

      No doubt you're going to tell us now that $60 is an inisgnificant amount to you too, well bully for you, some of us aren't so fortunate. Hearing someone who didn't pay tell me that I'm a cheapskate for caring that I didn't get what I did pay for leaves me pretty pissed off. I don't expect you to have the capacity to empathise with that.

    6. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ps. I don't live in the US. Relatively speaking I'm not getting cheap rent for $60(US) a week, and 35% of my earnings goes on rent.

    7. Re:Mandrake by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 1

      That sucks man, it really does. Don't worry. We'll steal OpenOffice for you.

      --
      Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
    8. Re:Mandrake by GravySkin · · Score: 1

      That is the one thing I hate about the linux community. Too many of us expect everything for free. Companies need to pay workers. Sometimes I just wish Microsoft would bitch slap us.

      --
      "never met a Microsoft zealot"
    9. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a good reason to become a terrorist suicide bomber

    10. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      free is good. greed is probably not the best or most efficient determinant of human progress.

    11. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you contribute even more and get even more in return, well heck, that's even better.

      OH MY GOD! You sound like a...CAPITALIST! WTF are you doing using Linux?

    12. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      All members are created equal.
      Some are more equal than others.

    13. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I don't live in the US

      In that case quit worrying and just pirate staroffice. You'll feel better. We'll feel better. Everyone feels better except sun, who are the people that really screwed us over on staroffice anyways.

    14. Re:Mandrake by AVee · · Score: 1

      Blame Sun, not Mandrake. Sun stopped giving away Star Office for free, that's a decicion the guys at Mandrake can't change, Sun will make them pay for every copy of Star Office...

      You might just be fine getting a previous, free, version of Star Office, but if you'll want the SO6, you'll have to pay. That sucks bigtime, I agree about that, but you should blame Sun for that, not Mandrake.

      Besides, am I the only one that has the feeling Sun doesn't really know wich way it wants to go? The only thing you hear from them lately is yet another policy change.

    15. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen, you fucking loser, if $60 is a big ass amount of money, turn off your fucking PC, give it to your welfare collecting neighbor (who at least has enough children to be drawing a significant amount of money from the state), and go out and get a fucking JOB.

      Might I suggest the fast food industry, as they pay pretty much what you are worth.

      Failing that, you should contact the stile's project and find out if they want a real live person this time for the suicide hanging prank.

    16. Re:Mandrake by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      Perhaps this guy is using Linux because he likes it. I know I do, and I'm a capitalist type. Still, I do think that there are more important things than money, like happiness.

      You were misrepresenting capitalist and Linux users at the same time, though. Nice troll, but that's all your comment was worth.

    17. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear jeffehobbs,

      Please send me $5.00. It's not much; maybe you can write it off on your taxes next year as a charitable donation.

    18. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > free is good. greed is probably not the best or most efficient determinant of human progress.

      You're assuming free != greed; the parent poster wasn't making that assumption.

    19. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a "joke". Look it up.

    20. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blame Mandrake. They had weeks (if not a month) to change their terms. I only signed up one week and a half ago. There is no excuse for their slackness. This comes right after a big drive by them to get donanations. This sucks.

    21. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey, I've seen your type! You make insulting and rude comments, then after someone refutes it and calls it for the troll it is you claim that it was just a joke.

      Just joking.

    22. Re:Mandrake by unitron · · Score: 2
      "This comes right after a big drive by them to get donanations."

      I think they call that particular technique "The PBS".

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  6. We make a secure Operating System by microbob · · Score: 2, Funny

    We make a secure Operating System
    - Microsoft

    1. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There are no bugs in the code.

      Sun ad in Unix Review in the mid 90s

    2. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Windows is more secure than Linux"

      Microsoft after IIS hack allows hackers to post porn on my employer's web site.

    3. Re:We make a secure Operating System by xmedar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thats pitiful, I remember a former company I worked for spending many many thousands on being a member of MSDN so we could get access to "All the latest info", and surprise! When we needed docs for all those undocumented APIs, they told us to buy a source code licence, forgeting that they had already told us we would have access to the info we wanted through MSDN, they wanted an extra $500K if I recall, and I know of others this happened to, but somehow I can't see a line-item on any M$ accounts that says "Fraud"

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    4. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Ruliz+Galaxor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmmz... this remembers me of Oracle saying that it was impossible to hack them. Yeah, gimme a break, after two weeks 4-8 bugs detected.

    5. Re:We make a secure Operating System by WildBeast · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can say it's a bug, for me it's a feature :)

    6. Re:We make a secure Operating System by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Your opinion of "God" is even lower than mine.

    7. Re:We make a secure Operating System by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hahahaha funny original, why didn't I think of that?

      Why is it 99% of people who dis MS never actually code/develop programs anyways? I mean you can knock MSFT all you want and I'd still say the chances of you hacking into my box are slim to none. [Specially considering I am behind a router].

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    8. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom, you are a bright individual, and one of my early
      inispirations as a teen programmer.

      Why waste your time on /. ? you have better things to do.

    9. Re:We make a secure Operating System by 56ker · · Score: 1

      Oh they're not bugs in our products - they're just user input errors. Yeah it's a bug - but if you buy the new version for £25 you can actually print!

    10. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can probably hire like a pack of 3 or 4 programmers for $100k total to find and document all the undocumented APIs. hehehe. cool.

    11. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how did you know my grandpa's daughter's son's wife's father's son's dog's name???

    12. Re:We make a secure Operating System by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      At least I post with my real name.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    13. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what?

    14. Re:We make a secure Operating System by arkanes · · Score: 2

      I'd have to say the Oracle 91 website on the oracle website is the biggest - ran across it the other day looking for oracle 8i documentation - and they claim, in writing, that the oracle database can survive total physical failure of the server it's running on! Now, after thinking about it for a second, they probably mean that it can prevent data corruption and loss, but the way it's worded certainly makes it sound like Oracle is some magic application that can stay up even when it's hardware is destroyed. They also claim that it can't be broken by user error.

    15. Re:We make a secure Operating System by digitalunity · · Score: 1, Troll

      I walk god like a dog.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    16. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This site sucks. Linux is for retards.

    17. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Glytch · · Score: 2

      Why is it 99% of people who dis MS never actually code/develop programs anyways?

      Because BSODs don't magically go away when us non-coders sit down to use Windows, dimwit.

    18. Re:We make a secure Operating System by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So I

      a) have opinions
      b) Not childish like you to hide behind AC.

      See what AC tells me is that you are just a coward and doesn't believe in what you are saying. See when you grow up an ounce and get a bit of self-respect you will be able to post your real thoughts without hiding.

      Until then keep your commy loving thoughts to yourself.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    19. Re:We make a secure Operating System by layingMantis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why is it that some dolt (you) feels it necessary to reply to some cliched anti-Microsoft post with a cliched 'you linux geeks suck' post of his own?

      and by the way, where did you come up with your 99% figure? did your imaginary friend give you that one?

    20. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Nintendork · · Score: 1

      Did your employer bother to install the patches that MS provides? Was IIS set up properly? Probably not. All software has bugs and as they are discovered, patches are released. It's up to a responsible and competent admin to ensure that servers are kept up to date and setup properly.

    21. Re:We make a secure Operating System by barnaby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Listen here newbie.

      When I fix something I expect it to _stay_ fixed. But since you had to reinstall NT from scratch every now and then, all my hard work at patching the OS goes down the toilet. So I have to decide between loading the service packs in the right order (if your running IIS) and then loading the hotfixes or getting some sleep.

      It's a really shitty product that blames all its problems on its customers.

      Don't get me started on this particular piece of FUD from M$. Next you'll be telling me all 3rd party drivers are buggy and security by obscurity is correct, and my network will just work right when we finally go all M$ and wait of course.. the fix for you're current problem is in the next version, and yes we really did need to break the doc, xls, vsd file standards in order for you to pay us more fscking money next year....

      Get a fucking clue, you're being lied to by M$ and you believe it.

      --
      Barnaby
    22. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I (a different AC than before) like to remain anonymous unless saying something I'd like quoted back to me later. Mouthing off, and so on, is more fun anonymously. For instance, if I were to say something foolish like "Until then keep your commy loving thoughts to yourself." I'd do it anonymously. I'd also spell it commie.

      On a simmilar note, silly comments such as "Linux is geared for lamer troll boys that want to be cool by tatooing a linux penguin on their forehead without really thinking. I mean if Linux was so good why hasn't it crushed MS in terms of desktop users. One big reason is that Linux is not user friendly. Its designed by dorks for dorks. As soon as linux developers get their act together it will rock." on your website is also in poor judgement.

    23. Re:We make a secure Operating System by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      Good point...it amazes me what people will say when it can't be traced back to them. "No one knows me, time to mouth off for all the times mommy said she loved Johnny more!"

      We had this discussion on rec.martial-arts every month or so. Then it would be "Tae Kwon Do" sucks month. I wonder what's up on those boards these days...

      whistful sigh

    24. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      which? the hack or the porn? :)

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    25. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Oh hell, 3 weeks ago I found out that was most definitely not the case. Thank goodness for a recent hot backup.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    26. Re:We make a secure Operating System by bubbashipwreck · · Score: 1

      care to back that up by posting host name... ip address... whatever?

    27. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also from his site...
      Yeah you heard right I am pro-MS. Why? Because nobody else is.

      Wow.

      Tom really is an honest-to-goodness troll at heart, isn't he?

    28. Re:We make a secure Operating System by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      So what? Having my own opinions on the state of affairs is "poor judgement". I should blindly follow the Linux crowd?

      I think not.

      tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    29. Re:We make a secure Operating System by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      check out my url.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    30. Re:We make a secure Operating System by tantrum · · Score: 1

      do you really want someone to check how secure it is?

      no retaliation?

      You should never invite someone to try to hack your box unless you know him/her pretty well I think.

      Protection is way more fun than cracking!

    31. Re:We make a secure Operating System by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Ok lay down some grounds facts.

      I base my "security" on the fact my router works well. If you are going to try and hack it inform me via email [tomstdenis@yahoo.com] of the exploit.

      If you really want to destroy my machine [and are able to] just realize I will reinstall my OS and just turn shares off [which is the only service I think you might be able to exploit].

      I'd rather you didn't try at all, or if you did don't aim to kill my comp.

      But it would be interesting to see if you can see my comp through the router because according to the manual the way I have it setup should prevent you from contacting my machine directly.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    32. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Patches are not released if the software you are using is considered "Unsupported", in which case your only option is to either BUY the new version (which should have the bug fixed, and which may or may not still be able to run on the hardware you have).
      Fact is, you shouldnt have to pay to fix bugs which shouldnt have been there to start with, and you certainly shouldnt have to install a newer more bloated version to fix an old bug, and then have to spend even more money on newer hardware to support it.
      I am quite happy with my 486 dns server, running slackware 3.0, with kernel updated to 2.0.39, bind updated to 4.9.7 i believe, all FREE bugfixes for older buggy programs.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    33. Re:We make a secure Operating System by jstoner · · Score: 1

      But Oracle can run in the Astral Plane, independent of any material hardware. The trick is accessing your data from there.

      --

      'In knowledge is power, in wisdom humility.'
    34. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Nintendork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This arguement had nothing to do with FUD. If you listen to what you're saying, nothing is backed up by fact and you're spreading FUD about MS. Hypocrite. Maybe if you spent as much time on NT as you do on open source OSes, you wouldn't screw up your windows boxes and have to reinstall every once in a while. And where do you get off on calling me a newbie? I've been reading slashdot for ~4 years now which in my mind doesn't make me a newbie (Or a veteran for that matter). I hate MS business practices and think they are blowing smoke when they say that they're focusing more on security, but I don't blame them for admin incompetence. And when has MS blamed the users? Usually, they suck up the bad press and try to help their customers. When Nimda hit and compromised systems that never installed old patches, they offered free support! They tried to educate users on keeping up to date. And who the heck modded you insightful? All you spewed out was typical anti MS FUD that I see made on Slashdot by biased people. You don't like MS and don't like their products. Fine. Nothing justifies making claims that you can't back up.

    35. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Nintendork · · Score: 1

      Ack, I meant to say interesting, not insightful.

    36. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Nintendork · · Score: 1

      I agree that they dropped Windows 95 support too soon. If you look in the windowsupdate newsgroup, there's a posting in there by a MS guy. Apparently, they're definitely getting a lot of negative feedback on this matter and there's a good chance that 95 support will return within a month. It's in every companies best interest to keep their customers happy, so it wouldn't surprise me if they do bring it back. If they don't, it's another reason why I prefer to use Linux, FreeBSD, and MacOS.

    37. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Naw. Actually it's theraputic. I can drop in, anonymously vent my frustrations of the day, then be done with it. No nasty repercussions to deal with.

      Hell, most of the time nobody reads AC posts anyway. It's like whispering "My boss is an idiot" into a toilet".

    38. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      Funny thing is, we also shelled out the big buck$ for the MSDN Universal.

      I, too, needed access to undocumented interfaces (specifically Card&Socket Services in NT4SP3).

      The MSDN tech support guy sent me sample code, after making me swear up and down (and probably promising him my first-born -- I don't remember) that I wouldn't use it on anything EXCEPT NT4SP3.

      The code worked, no muss, no fuss, and (amazingly) no NDA (though we treated it as "Company Confidential" info).

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    39. Re:We make a secure Operating System by minus9 · · Score: 1

      I'd say this is totally on-topic if the vendor that sold him his router managed to convince him it made his network un-hackable.

    40. Re:We make a secure Operating System by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I've hung Linux before [try using full screen DGA apps at the same time as TV stuff...] so don't go telling me that Linux is all that.

      In fact with XP the only time I ever restart is when third party software fucks up [e.g. persistant startup crap]. Perhaps that is a shortcomming of the OS but when I fry the 3rd party crap I have no troubles.

      And at least XP is more graceful. When 3rd party crap GPF's it doesn't bring down my whole machine like TV stuff does.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    41. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Glytch · · Score: 2

      I've hung Linux before [try using full screen DGA apps at the same time as TV stuff...] so don't go telling me that Linux is all that.

      When in my post did I ever say anything about Linux? Please stop setting up strawman arguments.

    42. Re:We make a secure Operating System by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      Also from his site...
      Yeah you heard right I am pro-MS. Why? Because nobody else is.
      Wow.

      Oh my. Tom, you are a kindered spirit.

      I'm pro-cancer. Yup, you read it right. Every one else, including medical researchers and Ph.D.s, thinks cancer is a bad thing, so I felt badly for it and decided that I'd be pro-cancer, because nobody else is.

      [sigh] Simpleton.

      Tom is the kind of kid that you get when you raise your children in a city (Kanata) that dictates the color you can paint your house ("Earth tones only, please!"). He's deathly afraid of not conforming.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  7. Cigarettes by papasui · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    "Cigarettes don't kill people."

    1. Re:Cigarettes by dagoalieman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They don't. People kill themselves, by choosing to smoke them, and to continue doing so.

      "Guns kill people." Same case. It's not the gun, it's the person using it.

      .

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    2. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      To quote UHF: "Guns don't kill people, *I* do."

    3. Re:Cigarettes by kisrael · · Score: 2

      (-1, Offtopic...and I don't really want to get intoa big debate, but...)

      "They say that 'guns don't kill people, people kill people'...well I think the gun helps...If you just stood there and yelled BANG, I don't think you'd kill too many people."
      --Eddie Izzard

      Or, as someone else put it...every society has some loose screws running around. The trouble is in the USA, there rather more likely to be able to get some guns.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    4. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, um... RIGHT you are...

      Handguns are made for one purpose: to kill people.

      yeah yeah yeah... sure, you can use them for target practice and whatnot... but go to a handgun shooting range and what is the target? a human form.

      OH MY GAWD! I"M OFF_TOPIC!! SHOOT ME!! or worse yet, SUE ME!!

    5. Re:Cigarettes by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      skr1pt k1dd13s don't kill servers, malformed packets kill servers.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    6. Re:Cigarettes by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      The bullets and carcinogens provide the ability for both guns and cigarettes to kill people. Your argument is a cop-out.

    7. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least one study has shown that second-hand smoke is as bad, if not worse, than what the smoker inhales. People have developed lung cancer that can be traced to second-hand smoke. While most people don't get as much exposure, they often don't have the choice to avoid inhaling (kids of smokers, restaurants, public places, vestibules, college campus, etc.) So, yes, cigarettes can kill.

    8. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain to me how this is off-topic. This is probably one of the biggest lies that's currently being told..just because it's not computer related, it's "off-topic?" I don't see too many computer problems straining health-care systems globally, or being responsible for the contraction of disease, as well as hundreds of thousands of deaths per year.

    9. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't kill people. This crowbar in my hand enables me to kill trolls.

    10. Re:Cigarettes by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      Both cigarettes and guns are enablers, both can help achieve an end.

    11. Re:Cigarettes by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Actually, no people don't kill people either. It's a medical fact. You can die of general organ failure, loss of oxygen, loss of blood, but guns never killed anyone. I'm all for gun rights, and I think the people of slashdot are hypocrites for not being so. However, saying "cigarettes don't kill people," you're exposing yourself as an imbecile, because the distinction you made was implied in the original statement.

    12. Re:Cigarettes by Mr.Intel · · Score: 1

      I don't really want to get intoa big debate, but...

      Neither do I, but... the infamous 9.11.01 event shows that you don't have to have access to guns to kill, or even kill en masse. As for the loose screws in the USA, even without access to 'legal' guns, they would find them anyway. Where there is a will there is a way. Ask McVeigh, oh wait I guess you can't.

      --
      ASCII tastes bad dude.
      Binary it is then.
    13. Re:Cigarettes by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      True enough, but say I have a gun sitting on a table. It's not going to jump up and start mowing down people.

    14. Re:Cigarettes by Telemakhos · · Score: 1

      Hey, Bob Dole said during his '96 campaign that smoking was merely a habit. Who are you to question anything a politician says during a campaign? Especially a Republican who later sold himself to the pharmaceutical industry AND appears in ads with Britney Spears. Anyone even remotely connected with Britney, paradigm of innocence, deserves our undying trust.

      Dear me, I think I just wrote a troll.

    15. Re:Cigarettes by Posting=!Working · · Score: 1

      Guns don't kill people. Bullets do.

      Oh, sure you can beat someone to death with one, but it so rarely happens.

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    16. Re:Cigarettes by xonker · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's the bullet that causes the major problems. It takes a lot more effort to kill someone with a gun and no bullets...especially if they're faster than you are...

    17. Re:Cigarettes by G0SP0DAR · · Score: 1

      I'd say that statement is true. Cigarettes are harmless until you smoke them!

      --


      Calm down, it's *only* ones and zeroes.
    18. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly. guns don't kill people. gun bullets kill people. wait, no. then it would be, gun bullets don't kill people, the ability for human tissue to be easily damaged beyond repair kills people.

    19. Re:Cigarettes by smagruder · · Score: 2

      Guns don't kill people, but they sure make it easy to kill a lot of 'em, and fast!

      --
      Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
    20. Re:Cigarettes by Phork · · Score: 2

      guns do kill people, bullets kill people.

      --
      -- free as in swatantryam - not soujanyam.
    21. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might if it's left around a two year old...

    22. Re:Cigarettes by SCHecklerX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh great. We got a 'truth' person on slashdot. Couldn't you guys have come up with a better use for the money?

    23. Re:Cigarettes by moebius_4d · · Score: 2

      > "They say that 'guns don't kill people, people kill people'...well I think the gun helps...If you just stood there and yelled BANG, I don't think you'd kill too many people."
      >--Eddie Izzard

      If you want to make decisions about political questions that touch on the sovereignty of the individual and the balance between that and the good of the community based on a joke by a grade-B homosexual transvestite commedian, be my guest. I prefer to rely on actual statisitical studies of the effects of various choices together with an analysis of the ethics involved in those choices.

      >every society has some loose screws running around. The trouble is in the USA, there rather more likely to be able to get some guns.

      It's "they're." The question is what happens in places where its illegal to have guns and a "loose screw" gets one and starts to go to it, vs. places where people can legally carry. And the answer is, where people can legally carry they stop the "loose screw" before he does much damage. Not to mention the fact that fewer people try to commit violent crimes in places where the victim pool can arm themselves legally.

      I realize that my comment isn't funny, but perhaps you would be better served by using it as a starting point then Eddie Izzard or Bart Simpson.

    24. Re:Cigarettes by You+Are+A+Dumbass · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Ya smoke? It's your own damn fault, dumbass.

    25. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the winner of the lamest screen name ever goes to.............(drumroll)........you.

      well, at least you'll probably die soon.

    26. Re:Cigarettes by dagoalieman · · Score: 2

      I sure as hell did not mean to start a flamewar here, nor to be offtopic..

      Jeesh.

      Yes, bullets are the items that come from guns and cause the physical damage. Yes, a gun is a utility, or co-effectant in the death of people. No, I'm not saying that people shouldn't have gun rights- I believe quite the opposite, although I have no wish to own a gun myself.

      And I know that ciggarettes cause physical issues. I was merely saying that somewhere behind 99% of gun/tobacco related deaths were a brain, inhaling the intoxicants, or pulling the trigger. There are accidental deaths, but 90% of those could have been prevented using a little common sense with guns (point the damn thing in the air if not targeting something!! Unload before cleaning it, and test-shoot out any possible loaded ammunition. Sounds stupid, huh? I've had friends die that way. Not by me though, thank the Lord.)

      Neither the gun nor the ciggarette jumps up and says "Damnit, I wanna kill someone!" and goes out to harm someone. However, somewhere, a person with a brain uses them in their respective deadly manners, causing death.

      Sorry to offend anyone. I know you can nitpick this argument all you want. I'm not trying to flamebait or troll, but I fear there's no way to avoid it on this topic. And it's offtopic.

      At any rate, appologies to all I offended.

      (Oh, and by the way, our gun range targets are not people shadows. They are skeet/clay pigeons. We rednecks do indeed use guns for something other than people. Usually.)

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    27. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Actually, it's the bullet that causes the major
      >problems. It takes a lot more effort to kill
      >someone with a gun and no bullets...especially
      >if they're faster than you are...

      I think you could make a fair argument that a gun without bullets will kill a person a good deal quicker than bullets without a gun.

    28. Re:Cigarettes by Bush+Pig · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      Guns are considerably harder to get hold of in Australia than the USA. A considerably smaller percentage of the Australian population gets offed by some lunatic with a handgun than happens in the USA. Work it out.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    29. Re:Cigarettes by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      To quoth Archie Bunker: "Would you rather they was pushed outta windows?"

    30. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >However, saying "cigarettes don't kill people," you're exposing yourself as an imbecile, because the distinction you made was implied in the original statement.

      But cigarettes don't kill people. Tumors do.

    31. Re:Cigarettes by OWJones · · Score: 2

      If you want to make decisions about political questions that touch on the sovereignty of the individual and the balance between that and the good of the community based on a joke by a grade-B homosexual transvestite commedian, be my guest.

      And, of course, making personal attacks on the voice of an idea completely discredits the idea itself. Good show.

      I prefer to rely on actual statisitical studies of the effects of various choices together with an analysis of the ethics involved in those choices.

      I will, however, have to agree with you here. Sooooo ....

      It's "they're." The question is what happens in places where its illegal to have guns and a "loose screw" gets one and starts to go to it, vs. places where people can legally carry. And the answer is, where people can legally carry they stop the "loose screw" before he does much damage. Not to mention the fact that fewer people try to commit violent crimes in places where the victim pool can arm themselves legally.

      After all that I'm still waiting for a solid statistic or citation. As a starting place, try this page at the Violence Policy Center, that actually cites research into gun violence. (Hint: they disagree with your "facts".)

      I realize that my comment isn't funny, but perhaps you would be better served by using it as a starting point then Eddie Izzard or Bart Simpson.

      How so? You a) failed to provide any statistics about an issue on which you took a high moral and ethical ground, b) demonstrated your own egotism about said issue and debating techniques, and c) failed to be even remotely entertaining.

      Bzzzzzt! Sorry, try again.

      -jdm

    32. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...using it as a starting point then Eddie Izzard...

      It's than. Try getting your own grammar straight before you correct others.

      where people can legally carry they stop the "loose screw" before he does much damage

      And how often does this happen? Every news story I hear about, some nut goes apeshit with a gun on a crowded street or in a shopping mall, and it ends one of two ways: he blows his own head off or is eventually stopped by police. Never do you hear about the psycho who was stopped by a hero NRA member.

      The myth of the well-armed populace has no basis in reality, since most people, even if they had a gun, wouldn't shoot back. They would make a mad dash away from the danger, as 500,000 years of DNA development have programmed them to do. It'd be nice to think that we're all heroes waiting for our chance to stop mayhem, but most people (especially the cowards who hide behind firearms) are far more interested in self-preservation than heroism.

      That said, in the USA, we have the right to own firearms, and it's one I think is worth defending. I own a gun. I just don't think knee-jerk, jingoistic propaganda helps either side of the debate, except in so far as it is essentially a circle-jerk that helps like-minded people separate the world into "us" and "them".

      P.S. Izzard isn't gay, he just wears women's clothes. There's a difference.

    33. Re:Cigarettes by Monte · · Score: 1

      The myth of the well-armed populace has no basis in reality, since most people, even if they had a gun, wouldn't shoot back. They would make a mad dash away from the danger, as 500,000 years of DNA development have programmed them to do. It'd be nice to think that we're all heroes waiting for our chance to stop mayhem, but most people (especially the cowards who hide behind firearms) are far more interested in self-preservation than heroism.

      Perhaps you hadn't heard about that plane that crashed in PA on 11-Sep-2001. People on that plane fought off armed hijackers and killed themselves in the process in order to save the lives of strangers. I would say that incident in and of itself is sufficient evidence to reveal your assertation as the steaming pile of horseshit that it is.

    34. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...using it as a starting point then Eddie Izzard...
      It's than. Try getting your own grammar straight before you correct others.
      ...unless he meant to say 'start with my comments THEN move on to Eddie Izzard...'.

      In that case, his grammar looks fine to me.

    35. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps you hadn't heard about that plane that crashed in PA on 11-Sep-2001. People on that plane fought off armed hijackers and killed themselves in the process in order to save the lives of strangers.

      And you don't think that was an extraordinary circumstance? Where were the heroes on the other three planes? They didn't know (as did the Pennsylvania passengers) that they were certain to die anyway, so they sat placidly in their seats, hoping it would all blow over once the plane was in Havana or Malta or wherever the hijackers claimed they were taking it. Self-preservation at work.

      In the case of the plane that crashed in PA, the passengers knew with certainty that they would die if they did nothing. Might as well take the chance that they could thwart the hijackers. Self-preservation at work.

      In the case of a madman shooting up a street full of people, death is not certain. Given the chance, nearly all people in that situation would run. It's the smartest, most likely way to survive that situation. There's nothing wrong with running from danger.

      If locked in a room with a crazed, gun-toting lunatic who has sworn to them that they will not leave the room alive, most people would take the chance at trying to stop him. But that's very rarely the case, and not the case that most proponents of the "well-armed populace" myth are always on about.

    36. Re:Cigarettes by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure. My second-cousin, in Michigan, has stopped two armed robberies; simply being a pistol carrying US citizen, with some early army training and an intolerance for violators of civil obediance. He is quite a normal fellow in all other respects.

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

    37. Re:Cigarettes by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      Programs that genrate malformed packets don't kill servers, skr1pt k1dd13s kill servers.

    38. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you forced them down their throat, and made them choke to death

    39. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where people can legally carry they stop the "loose screw" before he does much damage

      And how often does this happen? Every news story I hear about, some nut goes apeshit with a gun on a crowded street or in a shopping mall, and it ends one of two ways: he blows his own head off or is eventually stopped by police.


      Police. Aren't they "people [who] can legally carry" who "stop the 'loose screw'"?

      Sounds like we need more of these ""people [who] can legally carry"!!

    40. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The myth of the well-armed populace has no basis in reality, since most people, even if they had a gun, wouldn't shoot back.

      SO, we need MORE people who can carry, to ensure there will always be a few who WILL shoot back!!!

  8. Re:What is CIO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the damn article, moron.

  9. Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    This post mindlessly bashes Microsoft, advocates Linux, and has misspelled words and profanity. I'm surprised Slashcode's internal checks didn't auto-moderate this up to 5, Informative.

  10. The Biggest Lie by RobertTaylor · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Easy self assemble...."

    1. Re:The Biggest Lie by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Funny
      how about the obvious:

      "News for Nerds, Stuff that matters."

      (I'll take my beating in private)

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    2. Re:The Biggest Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ""Easy self assemble...." "

      I'm still trying to put my"self" together. Anyone know where I can find an updated patch for a older model human?

    3. Re:The Biggest Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      news for turds, stuff that splatters

    4. Re:The Biggest Lie by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 1

      If my old moderation-able account wasn't $rtbl'd,
      I would happily moderate your post as 'Insightful' or 'Informative', but not as 'Funny'!

      Funny would tend to imply that it's not true...

  11. best lie by imsirovic5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "This new Athlon XP 2100+ with 512 megs of ram 160 GIG HD, G-force 4, DVD rewritable will help you get laid!" It was a cruel lie! I will never believe salesman again ;o(

    1. Re:best lie by phalse+phace · · Score: 5, Funny
      "This new Athlon XP 2100+ with 512 megs of ram 160 GIG HD, G-force 4, DVD rewritable will help you get laid!"

      You mean you didn't get that hint? You fool, you could've had him. He wanted you,... BAD!

    2. Re:best lie by ColaMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      well, you didn't get *laid* exactly - but in the end you did get *screwed*

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    3. Re:best lie by Perdo · · Score: 2

      Mine got me laid.. um really, take it from someone who SELLS them! An AMD haxor 'puter WILL GET YOU LAID. You will be so leet!

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    4. Re:best lie by M@T · · Score: 2

      This new Athlon XP 2100+ with 512 megs of ram 160 GIG HD, G-force 4, DVD rewritable will help you get laid!" It was a cruel lie! I will never believe salesman again

      Obviously you've messed with the configuration...
      It should definitely work out of the box.

      --
      'sapientia potestas est'
    5. Re:best lie by epsalon · · Score: 3, Funny

      "This new Athlon XP 2100+ with 512 megs of ram 160 GIG HD, G-force 4, DVD rewritable will help you get laid*!"

      _______
      * Only applies if you are female.

    6. Re:best lie by unitron · · Score: 2
      "It should definitely work out of the box."

      Yeah, but he was looking to work *inside* the box.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    7. Re:best lie by Superkind · · Score: 1

      In that case you can get laid at any time.

      --
      (In desperate search for a cool /. sig.)
  12. Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 5, Funny
    Microsoft Works

    I know it's overused, but hey it's valid.

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    1. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by NickFusion · · Score: 5, Funny

      And Microsoft Office! As it turns out, it's not an office at all, but merely some software.

      And now I have no idea where I'm going to put all these office chairs.

      --
      What were you expecting?
    2. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by hkhanna · · Score: 1

      ROFL! Someone, mod this guy up!

      --

      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
    3. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by archen · · Score: 1

      I think what they're referring to is , once you're in our upgrade cycle - MS will OWN your office

    4. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by reemul · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wasn't there a joke about MS thinking about selling office furniture? Something about a beta tester signing up because he was used to getting shrink wrapped stool samples from Microsoft anyway? Mebbe I'm forgetting...

      --
      You're just jealous 'cuz the voices talk to *me*
    5. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by laserjet · · Score: 2

      man, the worst thing I could imagine is getting samples of stool from microsoft...

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    6. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by Reziac · · Score: 2

      [examining stool samples from Micro$oft]

      Roundworms, hookworms, tapeworms, whipworms, flukes, coccidia, giardia,...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by joejoejoejoe · · Score: 0

      god bless you. i laughed out loud (I live alone) for a full 3 seconds.

      was that a triple entendre(sp)?

      nice one/.

      --
      Silly Rabbit: tricks are for kids.
    8. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by km00re · · Score: 1

      What about Red Hat?

      I bought Red Hat 7.2 and only got a bunch of CDs. No hat!

      --


      KM
    9. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never got samples of stool from rms then.

    10. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True story, overhead at Sea-Tac airport:
      MS dude: We love office. Sure it's garbage, but it's our garbage.

    11. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by DarklordJonnyDigital · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Excel.

    12. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by I.+M.+Bur · · Score: 1

      Hey, gotta bash the other side as well...

      /etc/passwd - the file with all user info, except passwords ;)

    13. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by demon · · Score: 1

      Well, it did have the passwords, once upon a time, but the /etc/shadow stole them. :)

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  13. We had a sales man from ... by crovira · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wang Mini Computer Systems sell a top of the l;ive 2200 system and neglect to tell the guy he sold it to, a drug store owner, that it had to be programmed.

    The guy took it, put in a wood shed out behing his little counrtyu drugstore and left it there for a couple of years until it finally got reposessed and made its way to our software firm where we were programming Wang 2200 machine (in BASIC. :-)

    I met that salesman and he was an absolute sleaze.

    Talk about selling a pig in a poke.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:We had a sales man from ... by Magila · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know if I could ever trust a company with the word "Wang" in it's name.

    2. Re:We had a sales man from ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, its better than a Mini Wang.

    3. Re:We had a sales man from ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:We had a sales man from ... by doorbot.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sounds as bad as one of my clients home machines, which, until recently, was a dual Pentium II machine running Windows 98. I don't know who sold it to him but it's good for a laugh around the office.

    5. Re:We had a sales man from ... by 56ker · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand this - what do you mean by "needed to be programmed" - was it not sold with an OS or something?

    6. Re:We had a sales man from ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maglia writes: I don't know if I could ever trust a company with the word "Wang" in it's name.

      Q : What's the name of Wang's top sales rep?

      A : Won Hung Lo

    7. Re:We had a sales man from ... by mickwd · · Score: 2

      Especially not their infamous German office - Wang, Cologne.

    8. Re:We had a sales man from ... by mickwd · · Score: 3, Funny

      And while I'm at it, proof that Siemens really does have a Staines office (search down about half-way).

    9. Re:We had a sales man from ... by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      It sounds like it's an old computer, and so it quite simply needed to be programmed. As in, it didn't have any software on it that would help the drug store guy with his job, and it's not like you could just hook it up to the Internet and download stuff.

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    10. Re:We had a sales man from ... by biobogonics · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know if I could ever trust a company with the word "Wang" in it's name.

      I won't forget the day the Madison Wisc. "Isthmus" ran a picture of a sign at the local Holiday Inn reading "Welcome Wang Users".

      [The "Ursula Understands" column accompanying the picture fielded several hardware and software questions, and was priceless.]

      Apparently in Australia they had more trouble with their slogan "Wang Cares".

      As for vaporware, the system was supposed to be secure, but somehow one of the secretaries at university hospital pushed the wrong button and dumped a report of the salaries of the top thoracic surgeons. My that was an interesting day!

    11. Re:We had a sales man from ... by d0s · · Score: 1

      when you boot some older machines, all you get is the basic compilier that's in ROM. you're supposed to write your own programs to suit your needs, and record them to tape (or 5 1/4 floppy).

    12. Re:We had a sales man from ... by dalutong · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was really confused for a while before I realized that, at least in America, "Wang" is said Wuh-ang... not Wuh-ah-ng... as it is said (at least) in China...

      Then again, i know nothing about the company... but wang, the chinese way, can mean good things (depending on tone, it can mean things like king)

      i guess that is one of those culture shock bits...

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    13. Re:We had a sales man from ... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Apparently in Australia they had more trouble with their slogan "Wang Cares".

      I doubt it, Wanker is a common surname in Australia (and IY}9 one in the NYC phone book too)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    14. Re:We had a sales man from ... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      wtf!

      (and IY}9

      I posted "and I saw it in"

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    15. Re:We had a sales man from ... by Overphiend · · Score: 1

      Whats worse about that, is that if you called microsoft support after Win98 came out and asked about dual proc support, that would try to sell you a "patch" to make it support the second proc. The "Patch" was like $500. No idea what it actually was, but we got a kick out of it just the same.

    16. Re:We had a sales man from ... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2

      The joke at the time was, "Stop playing with your Wang, and RTFM!"

    17. Re:We had a sales man from ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No doubt... He runs CA now. Now if that's not one sleazy place...

  14. One word... by mikeage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashcode. ;)

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  15. His name was Xenu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This comment contained copyrighted text and was removed at the request of the copyright owner under the terms of the DMCA.

    1. Re:His name was Xenu. by bigethespe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Better watch out, or Slashdot may get harrassed like google did by the Scientologists!

      Ref: Wired News Story

    2. Re:His name was Xenu. by iloveAB · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Slashdot already has been harassed by the Scientologists.

      The Register news story

    3. Re:His name was Xenu. by reynaert · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Scientology has harrassed Slashdot in the past.

      See Scientologists Force Comment Off Slashdot. This comment, also containing the OT III, was removed. I wonder if they'll notice it this time, now it isn't posted in a Co$-related story.

    4. Re:His name was Xenu. by Genghis+Troll · · Score: 0, Funny

      "Interestingly, the Slashdot announcement contains a lengthy talkback section towards the bottom, the cloying supportiveness of which suggests that Malda's got himself a gaggle of cultish, right-thinking followers and apologists on a par with Hubbard's."

      Hahahaha!

    5. Re:His name was Xenu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sent to Anonymous Coward ?

    6. Re:His name was Xenu. by istartedi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Me What's that?

      S It's an e-meter. It tells you the state of your health, spirit, etc (I don't actually recall what she said) Do you want to try it?

      Me Yes.

      S OK, hold it like this...

      Me Wow. I can make the meter move pretty much any way I like just by gripping it a little more tightly.

      S Don't do that.

      Me How do you know people aren't doing that subconsciously?

      S You have to let go (or something like that). This was accompanied by a look that told me she knew I was a skeptic, she had dealt with us before, didn't really care, and simply wanted to move on to the next sheep. (it's amazing how much can be communicated with just one look sometimes).

      The only other time I've ecountered a Scientologist was downtown. He asked me if I wanted to see a free movie. I figured there would be at least a half hour of propoganda with the movie, and I didn't feel like sitting through that so I declined.

      The way I see it, Scientology is to the private sector what the lottery is to the public sector--a way to tax stupidity.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    7. Re:His name was Xenu. by csbruce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This was accompanied by a look that told me she knew I was a skeptic, she had dealt with us before, didn't really care, and simply wanted to move on to the next sheep.

      Studies have shown that only about 2% of the general population are vulnerable to cult recruitment & indoctrination. It's only sensible to filter out the other 98% as efficiently as possible.

      (There is another 1-2% who are basically psychotic and will do nasty things just for the asking, but you want to filter them out as well, since they won't follow orders later on.)

    8. Re:His name was Xenu. by The_dev0 · · Score: 1
      Man! I was totally waiting for you to sing "His name was Xenu, he was a dancer..."

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    9. Re:His name was Xenu. by buzzbomb · · Score: 1

      Scientology is to the private sector what the lottery is to the public sector--a way to tax stupidity.

      I need to get involved with those guys. If they can tax stupidity, I want a cut...there's a lot of stupid people out there.

    10. Re:His name was Xenu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AHAHAHAHA.

      hey. wait. that's true.

    11. Re:His name was Xenu. by Scipher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One time a friend and I were stoned and trying to killing time in the city, when I was given a leaflet advertising "Free IQ test".
      Wanting to see how the green may have affected our intelligence we went to the address to find it was a tiny Church of Scientology hidden away on the third floor of a building that looked condemned. We were greeted and sat down to two tests - an multiple choice IQ test and a timed aptitude test. After completing a drone told us that while the tests were being marked we can watch a film about their organisation. Wanting to get a good look at the religion, I did not hesistate to sit through it. A well-produced piece of propaganda followed. It featured some actor I had never heard of extolling the virtues of finding inner peace and enlightenment through "auditing", and also served to advertise the Scientology meditation retreats (the church owns a large cruise ship, and many hotels). After viewing the film we were presented with the results, both of which were around 140 for the IQ. The IQ results had lines indicating current ability, and the ability levels 1 month and 1 year after joining, projecting 150 and 180 respectively.

      To me this seemed like absolute BS.

      They then started the hard sell, personal testimonies and all. I remember freaking out that these people had so much faith in the fictional construct of a long deceased sci-fi author.
      All we could do was to refuse several times the offer to buy some literature (we asked for it for free; denied) and headed out of there.

      It was a pretty funny afternoon.

      - Scipher

    12. Re:His name was Xenu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget that there are many of us who seek out "cults" by our own because of our own personal convictions and the willingess to do something about ourselves and our relations to others/the world/whatever. So that 2% you are refering to is not necessarily a weakness, but if you get into the wrong group, sadly not many of those people leave in time. They WANT TO BELIEVE IN IT so much that it clouds their vision (I'm not one of them! ;*). This is something everyone succumbs to sometimes in their life.

      What is so special about cults that people should avoid is that they encourage unbalanced and irrational behaviour, they encourage lying to new members "for their own good" and rationalize every bad thing they do while condemning other people for their "bad actions" (hypocritical behaviour).

      Having said that. The biggest disease in this world today is that PEOPLE DON'T CARE. It's so much easier to bash people that do, than caring yourself and doing something about it. It's not that the "system fails", "the system" is a new invention that has never worked! Instead we should wake up, stand up and take a stand for ourselves and our neighbours.

    13. Re:His name was Xenu. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

      AFAIK IQ doesn't change much throughout your lifetime, if measured correctly, so the idea that you could go from 140 to 180 is pure fantasy. I could believe a few points variation due to eating a healthy diet vs. eating mcdonalds, but 30%???

    14. Re:His name was Xenu. by Marvita · · Score: 1

      IQ's only a measure of how well you do at a test, it's possible to practise and get better at them. Not that I'm going to be indoctrinated into the Co$ just to practice IQ tests, you understand...

    15. Re:His name was Xenu. by k98sven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Studies have shown that only about 2% of the general population are vulnerable to cult recruitment & indoctrination

      I doubt that statement.
      Perhaps it is true if you mean that 2% of the
      population at any given moment in time are vunerable to cult recruitment,
      but in reality: We all have moments when we are weak or depressed, our self-esteem is low and we are vunerable.

      IMHO, realizing this vunerability is an important step in protecting yourself from the dangers of cults.

      Also, realize that people don't join cults.
      They are invited to 'discussion groups' or 'councilling' or 'therapy' or some other cover.

      Cult indoctrination is gradual, like the frog in boiling water. (Or, a bait-and-switch scam as it is known in con-man terms)

    16. Re:His name was Xenu. by nahdude812 · · Score: 2
      I think he means 2% are essentially vulerable, as in at no point in their day/month/year are they not vulnerable, versus the rest of the population that suffers from vulnerability as their mental faculties are worn down by their environment.


      There are people who could be feeling great about themselves, you walk up to them and say "It is evil to feel good about yourself and you should feel ashamed. When you feel guilty, then your guilt can be replaced with good feelings." and these people would fall to the ground quivering because they constantly cycle between feeling good about themselves then feeling guilty for that, causing them to feel good about feeling guilty, ad-vegetum.


      Well, probably not, but some people are extremely controllable in similar means.

    17. Re:His name was Xenu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if they'll notice it this time, now it isn't posted in a Co$-related story.

      In what way is the subject "Most Outrageous Vendor Lie Ever Told?" not about Co$?

      -- Posting anonymously to prevent later harrassment.

    18. Re:His name was Xenu. by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Studies have shown that only about 2% of the general population are vulnerable to cult recruitment & indoctrination. It's only sensible to filter out the other 98% as efficiently as possible.

      (There is another 1-2% who are basically psychotic and will do nasty things just for the asking, but you want to filter them out as well, since they won't follow orders later on.)


      I heard that on top of that, I heard from a reliable resource that there's roughly about another 10-20% who can't do basic math. Percentages, in particular. Can't remember who I heard that from, though.. might've been one of them marketing people?

    19. Re:His name was Xenu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, what you described in your first paragraph IS the 2%. They probably have those X-Files 'I want to believe' posters on their walls too.

    20. Re:His name was Xenu. by thud2000 · · Score: 1

      That's "He was a showgirl..."

    21. Re:His name was Xenu. by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Just a test to weed out the Manilow fans ;)

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    22. Re:His name was Xenu. by bobKali · · Score: 1

      Yea, and 64% of all statistics are made up.

    23. Re:His name was Xenu. by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 2

      Pfff.. 73% of people accept that as a lie!

      I'm kinda amused no one's pointed out my word repetition/stuttering up there. : )

  16. Re:What is CIO? by rewdy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    CIO = Chief Information Officer.

    the purpose of a CIO is to advice and assist his/her supervisors and other senior managers to ensure that information technology is acquired and information resources are managed in a manner that implements the policies and procedures established by that corporation.

    </learnin'>

  17. IBM once told me.. by digitalsushi · · Score: 2, Funny

    This one time on slashdot, there was this IBM ad... they were cocky enough to claim that they could BOX HACKERS OUT and still manage to BUILD TRUST IN.

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    1. Re:IBM once told me.. by RazorJ_2000 · · Score: 1

      "This one time, in band camp...."

      --
      pi=sigma{n:0-infinity}[(1/16)^n][(4/(8n+1))-(2/(8n +4))-(1/ (8n+5))-(1/(8n+6))]
  18. Vendor Lie by Metrollica · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the entire software industry:

    "It's not a bug, it's a feature."

    --



    --Metrollica
    1. Re:Vendor Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Score: 5; Funny)

      Pretty good, pretty good :-D

      -f

  19. Panasonic key phone systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're easy to install, a snap to program, and you can expand them any time, and we can do it for less than $4000.

    An outrage on all counts. And a rip off. Stick with whatever Lucent calls its phones these days.

    1. Re:Panasonic key phone systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lucent? the folks who sell $1000 "surge suppressors" (so labeled and everything) that are actually just power strips and rj11 couplers?

      At least panasonic will sell their parts to the public. Your installer's "labor" must have been about 3/4 of that price you paid.

  20. sure that feature will be fixed next release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was fed that line by the support guys for a certain FEA package then next release the fix was to eradicate any trace of said feature. Guess i cant complain about it not working any more tho.

  21. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I got news for ya. You actually can do stuff with Windows. The vast majority of problems with the WinNT line (Win9X is horrid and i won't defend it at all) has nothing to do with Windows itself.

    I realize I'm going to draw criticism for this, seeing as how apparently some people have issues with Win2k. My perspective on this is from being the assistant-administrator for my office of around 17 or so. Almost everybody is on Win2k, I think one person is on 98. Other than a minor issue with an old laptop having difficulty going into standby mode (a bios flash fixed this), I've had no Windows or even Microsoft related problems to report. The problems that do come up are nearly always the fault of the company making the software. Netscape, for example, doesn't like to stay running for an entire day without crashing at least once. That's not a Windows problem. Netscape has never been known for its stability on any platform.

    In any case, MS certainly kept their promise of greater stability with Windows 2k, and I am very glad that we upgraded the whole office to it.

    Let me give you a piece of advice, though. Do some research before you make a switch like that. Go to www.deja.com, for example, to see what people have to say about a product. If they say it sucks, then keep that in mind. Find out why. We didn't go to 2K until we had tested it on a few machines. We didn't buy it based on a vendor promise. We certainly aren't running MS servers, we're running Linux there. We know better because we looked into it. It is a lot harder to be succeptable to vendor lies when you do reasearch like this.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  22. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    the Mircosoft/Korn shell incident. Classic

    1. Re:How about... by xbrownx · · Score: 0

      can you elaborate on this?

    2. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes please do

    3. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to share the details there, sparky?

    4. Re:How about... by Dahan · · Score: 1

      See Question 5. And this story, which has been fowarded all over the place.

    5. Re:How about... by Metrollica · · Score: 0

      Slashdot had an interview with David Korn that covers the Microsoft/Korn shell here. Just scroll down to question 5. There's another story here. Just think that in August 98 MS wanted to let users run a few UNIX apps on NT.

      --



      --Metrollica
    6. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From Rik Farrow:


      Microsoft also announced a UNIX compatibility toolkit, based on MKS-UNIX tools for Windows. The toolkit includes MKS's version of the Korn shell, which prompted a gray-haired man, wearing a T-shirt with his own name on it, to stand up and approach a microphone. This person began to explain to the Microsofties that the MKS Korn shell was not compliant with even half the specifications in the two books published so people can write compliant Korn shells. The Microsoft engineer attempted to argue that their Korn shell was compliant, until someone pointed out that the man he was facing was Dave Korn.


      Unless the Anon Cow was referring to the band...

    7. Re:How about... by BJH · · Score: 1

      Unless the Anon Cow was referring to the band...

      Maybe you should see this...

  23. Chain of [Flash] Fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is actually a multiparter. The vendor basically said that:
    • if the client wanted to have an up-to-date, respectable website, it must have pull-down menus;
    • if they wanted pull-down menus, they must do it in Macromedia Flash; and
    • if they wanted Flash to work on their website, they must switch to Cold Fusion Server.
    The vendor was a Macromedia shop with over a dozen employees; they are now out of business.
  24. Sun Whoppers by pnatural · · Score: 1, Troll

    Java is a Systems Language.

    Java Community Program is open.

    Java is a Standard.

    and my favorite:

    Java is Object Oriented.

    1. Re:Sun Whoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is parent modded up?

      because all fuckwit moderators are l33t

    2. Re:Sun Whoppers by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      The first one is a lie. The others? Prove that they are.

    3. Re:Sun Whoppers by elmegil · · Score: 2

      I'll give you all the others, despite disagreeing with them. But how in fsck's name can you say with a straight face that Java is not Object Oriented?

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    4. Re:Sun Whoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ok, the middle two are open to debate.

      but the first and last are flat out wrong. Java is ideal for large systems and servers. Java is also an object oriented language. Whoever says it isnt (including pnatural) deserves to be taken out back for a photo shoot

    5. Re:Sun Whoppers by pnatural · · Score: 1

      But how in fsck's name can you say with a straight face that Java is not Object Oriented?

      ever heard of polymorphism? i bet you haven't if java is what you consider to be OO.

      the other big reason java is toy-OO and not real-OO is that base types are not objects.

    6. Re:Sun Whoppers by pnatural · · Score: 1

      ok, if java is a systems language, then why hasn't sun rewritten solaris in it? ding! they can't because java is not, and cannot be, a systems language.

      i'm sorry that sun has pulled the OO-wool over your eyes, but it sure as hell isn't OO. to be OO, it would need to support polymorphism, which it don't, and base types would have to be objects, which they ain't.

    7. Re:Sun Whoppers by IronClad · · Score: 1
      i'm sorry that sun has pulled the OO-wool over your eyes, but it sure as hell isn't OO. to be OO, it would need to support polymorphism, which it don't, and base types would have to be objects, which they ain't.

      I nominate this!

    8. Re:Sun Whoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      int[] you = {1,2,3};
      Clonable c = you;

      Is that not polymorphic? If not then give an example of what is (and why it cant be done in Java)

      Primitives are quite useful, but if you need to have an object fine.

      So:
      int youAreATroll = 1;
      is much easier than
      Integer youAreATrollObject = new Integer("0");

      I know you love smalltalk but pls dont have a small Mind.

    9. Re:Sun Whoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hum, now I maybe just some newbie OO programmer but I thought that polymorphism was the ability for two different objects (say A & B) to respond to the same message in a different way.

      In Objective-C and Smalltalk this is trivial as neither are strictly typed languages.

      In Java for an object (C) to hold a reference that could be one of a number of different classes you define an interface and ensure that objects A & B conform to that. The pointer type is the interface label. That way the pointer can reference objects that do not share a common super-class with the required methods.

      Objective-C calls this mechanism protocols.

      All of these languages Smalltalk, Objective-C and Java support instropection (reflection in Java-speak)

      So you don't even need to use interfaces in Java if you don't want to. Although I'll admit looking at some reflection code just to call a method in Java is ugly. But some of the API classes require this strategy (JInternalPane and JFrame for example respond to a set of messages but don't specify a common interface)

      As for having primatives. Just because a language does not treat everything as an object does not mean it is not OO.

      Smalltalk is the only runtime system I know of in which everything is an object, so I guess that you use that.

      Educating others about the virtues of the likes of Smalltalk and Objective-C is good. But not going about it like you have.

      Remember a great many more people use C++ which is less of an object orientated language than Java.

      For some reason I can't log in, I'm not anonymous I'm Senjaz. :P

    10. Re:Sun Whoppers by jeffy124 · · Score: 2

      polymorphism:

      assume class B extends from A

      A a = new B();

      Tada!!

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    11. Re:Sun Whoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it appears your definition of systems is different from everyone else. When someone says "systems" people think of software systems. Servers, databases, user-applications. Java is excellent for all of those. Java is not an operating systems language (like C) and was never designed to be one.

      and as for polymorphism. consider a class X that extends from a class Z.

      X x = new Z();

      That's polymorphism my friend.

      Soon Java's also gonna have generics:
      ArrayList<Integer> a = new ArrayList();
      (or something like that)

      point: JAVA HAS POLYMORPHISM!! NOW LETS GET THAT PHOTO DONE!

    12. Re:Sun Whoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember a great many more people use C++ which is less of an object orientated language than Java.

      I think you have that backwards. C++ has multiple-inheritace, virtual methods, and templates. Java dont. (or at least, java dont have templates yet. but they're calling them generics)

    13. Re:Sun Whoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the biggest one of all?

      Java is Platform independent

      Sure: if your platforms consist of Sun Ultra Servers or 80686 Linux boxes. If you have anything else you won't run that slow Java "app" on it.

    14. Re:Sun Whoppers by Ghengis · · Score: 1

      try the "Integer" class, and the "Float" class. Learn some more about the language before you bad-mouth it.

      --

      "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

    15. Re:Sun Whoppers by Ghengis · · Score: 1

      Java doesn't need templates because every class is a subclass of the "Object" class. If you need "template-like" behavior, declare you classes and methods of type Object.

      --

      "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

    16. Re:Sun Whoppers by flegged · · Score: 2

      Polymorphism is the ability to treat any subclasses as if they were the type of a superclass.
      eg

      BaseClass[] baseClass = new BaseClass[2];
      baseClass[0] = new BaseClass();
      baseClass[1] = new SubClass();

      for (int i = 0; i < baseClass.length(); i ++){
      System.out.println(baseClass[i].toString());
      }

      --

      "I think he was truly surprised at how little I cared about how big a market the Mac had" - Linus on Jobs
    17. Re:Sun Whoppers by jeffy124 · · Score: 2

      yeah, you're right. Java doesnt explicitly require templates because of that Object base. But I'm actually in favor of generics because it can clean up code readibility. take a peek at gilad bracha's presentation[pdf] on the topic from last year's JavaOne. Note how the code reads (and when errors happen) in slides 9 and 10.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    18. Re:Sun Whoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah also what is the abstract and extends in teh class declarations about.

      It's not that Java isn't OO, merely that people have no fucking clue what OO actually is and very few who comment on it seem to have ever used java for any kind of OO programming.

    19. Re:Sun Whoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Java does not have operator overloading. That doesn't mean Java is not polymorphic.

    20. Re:Sun Whoppers by JeremyR · · Score: 1
      ever heard of polymorphism? i bet you haven't if java is what you consider to be OO.

      Java has polymorphism. Who told you otherwise?

      the other big reason java is toy-OO and not real-OO is that base types are not objects.

      If by this you mean that it still has primitive types, then you are correct (although there are wrapper classes for each of the primitives types if one needs to use them in an object-compatible way). In this sense Java is still clinging to its roots in the hybrid-OO language C++, although it's for what I think is a sound reason (doing arithmetic on, for example, lots of primitive numeric types should be faster than doing arithmetic on lots of numeric objects).

      Cheers,
      Jeremy

    21. Re:Sun Whoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1 out of 4 ain't bad.


      I don't recall Sun ever saying Java is a Systems Language.


      Java does claim the Java Community is open. No, it doesn't meet my definition of "open" either.


      The Java language is a standard. The Java virtual machine is a standard. The Java class library may not be.


      Uh, Java does meet my definition of Object Oriented, including inheritance and polymorphism.

    22. Re:Sun Whoppers by Senjaz · · Score: 1

      C++ virtual methods ~= Java abstract methods

      Multiple inheritance has more disadvantages than advantages. Specificially with resulting code structure.

      The advantages of it are offset by the concepts of interfaces/protocols and deligation in Smalltalk, Objective-C and Java. Both of which are a more elegant way of doing things.

      Objective-C also has categories as a way of bolting on additional methods to existing classes and have them present in all the superclasses of that class.

      Try looking at the power of the Foundation and AppKit frameworks for Objective-C. The flexibility you get with so few classes has to be seen to really be conprehended. You also write less code to get useful stuff done.

      I suggest looking at Apple's dev tools (previously NeXTStep/OpenStep or if you haven't got access to a Mac OS X box. Take a peek at http://www.gnustep.org/ and http://www.squeak.org/

      The Java API is a huge mess but in defence of SUN they do have to do have to provide everything a devoper might need. You can't make OS calls in Java and maintain cross-platform support.

      I don't know about templates, I know they were a more recent addition to C++.

      --
      Don't blame me - this .sig had steal me written all over it.
  25. 90 days till you're up and running... by Dr_Bones · · Score: 1

    ...followed by an army of vendor-supplied consultants who barely know their name. 2 years later, the project is still on hold.

    1. Re:90 days till you're up and running... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM by any chance???

  26. things _not_ told. by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The ones that I hate the most, are the things not told. But where everything is set up so that it suggests, and you assume, that there's features that's not really there.
    Fx. when comparisons or references to similar products are made and you assume that it has the same features as the other product. And sometimes features gets the same descriptions but it turns out to be a poor substitute.

    Like when a certain software company's whitepapers for a product, claims it can to the same as the competition. When the boss buys it and you get to install it, you discover that it indeed are capable of doing the same things. The only catch is that it is implemented very poorly, but hey, das blinking lights are all in place.

  27. Microsoft by 56ker · · Score: 0, Troll

    Windows 95 is bug-free.... Then when Windows 98 came out We have fixed 7000 bugs since Windows 95 (keep going... keep going) :o)

    1. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's no such thing as "bugfree software". especially when talking on a grand a scale as an operating system... I've never seen a MS claim to "bugfree software"...

  28. Oracle by Metrollica · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oracle: Unbreakable

    --



    --Metrollica
    1. Re:Oracle by Metrollica · · Score: 0
      --



      --Metrollica
    2. Re:Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oracle: Unbreakable

      Wasn't that a movie with Bruce Willis & Samuel L. Jackson?

    3. Re:Oracle by bc3-au · · Score: 1

      What get's me about this is is that although an alert was published a couple of months ago, I picked up a New Scientist on Friday and Oracle are STILL running the add internationally, KNOWING it's a lie.

    4. Re:Oracle by crudeboy · · Score: 1
      Well why wouldn't they keep running the ads? John Doe buying databases probably doesn't know, or care, that they're lying...

      It's not really a lie if they don't actually guarantee that it's unbreakable, which they don't, they merely state how they view their breakable product based on old evaluations

      Cheers!

  29. My Vote: by maniac1860 · · Score: 1

    "Team Fortress 2 will only be avaliable as an expansion pack for the soon-to-be-released Half Life." Complete with screenshots.

  30. "Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by pivo · · Score: 3, Funny

    This claim was made by a salesman to a non-tech potential client at a company I was visiting. The product had nothing to do with J2EE. The salesperson's rationalization for his misinformation was that their product didn't prevent you from running J2EE applications and therefore was compatible.

    1. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by archen · · Score: 1

      Sort of reminds me of when I was walking by VCRs in Walmart that were marked "Y2k compatible". Which is nice to know that your VCR won't be sucked into a time vortex because of some spacial anomalie that makes it incompatible with the millennium

    2. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by peter+hoffman · · Score: 2

      That reminds me of the Salesman's Universal Correct and Knowledgeable Answer (SUCKA):

      Yes, when properly configured, our product will do that.

      Of course, it may take a complete rewrite to properly configure the product!

    3. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by bobthemonkey13 · · Score: 1

      I once saw power strips advertised to protect "computers up to 350 MHz". Of course, the more expensive one could go up to 450 MHz. Yes, you have to buy a more expensive power strip for a faster computer. Riiiiiiiiight.

    4. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      I once saw power strips advertised to protect "computers up to 350 MHz". Of course, the more expensive one could go up to 450 MHz. Yes, you have to buy a more expensive power strip for a faster computer.

      Fool! Everyone who's anyone is overclocking their powerstrips nowadays!

    5. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      What I find humorous is that at Walmart (haven't checked K-Mart, Target, or Shopko) is that sugre protectors in electronics might cost 12-15 for a cheap one, but if you wander over to hardware you can find nicer ones for less.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    6. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      I side with the salesperson here, this is a valid answer to a stupid question. If the product didn't have anything to do with Java, why ask if it's compatible? The only possible answers at that point are "no, it will prevent Java apps running" or "yes, it is compatible." Compatible is not in the same class as Integrated or Designed For.

      Garbage In, Garbage Out.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    7. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by pivo · · Score: 1

      You must be a lawyer. Of course the answer was technically correct, but then so is the statement, "Microsoft Internet Explorer is Linux compatible" because running IE does not prevent you from running Linux, even though you may have to go to great lengths to do so, possibly by using a different machine.

      It was a disingenuous statement designed to get a commission and not to help the customer.

      The product did have someting to do with Java, by the way, just not J2EE.

    8. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not garbage in, J2EE compatible is actually a meaningful statement. It means that an application server implements the j2ee specifications.

    9. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by AME · · Score: 2

      Actually, the calendar on my VCR screwed up on 1-Jan-2000. It called the year "A0" and the day of the week was off by one. Made programming it to record shows on a particular day a real bother. I tried many things to correct it, but the problem didn't go away until 1-Jan-2001.

      --
      "I have a good idea why it's hard to verify programs. They're usually wrong." --Manuel Blum, FOCS 94
    10. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by fwc · · Score: 2
      VCR's I can understand, some have the date in them for programmed recording. It's the mousepads one store was selling just before Y2K with big "Year 2000 Compliant" stickers on them that made me laugh.

      Makes me wonder what a non-Y2K compliant mouse pad did at a millisecond past the end of 1999..... Or perhaps even a better question, how many people upgraded their mouse pads for fear of them not working after 1999.

    11. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

      VCRs I can understand (they do have a timer after all).

      I saw an advert where a *bread knife* was marked y2k compatible.

  31. Airport Security Machine Vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says these pictures:

    http://www.rapiscan.com/documents/Secure.htm

    are X-rays.

    1. Re:Airport Security Machine Vendor by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Nice shins

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  32. 3 lies.. by laserweasel · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I'm sorry you're having problems, ma'am. Our computers are reliable and we rarely recieve customer complaints." - Me when I worked for Dell.

    --
    ["Marge, I agree with you - in theory. In theory, communism works. In theory." - Homer]
    1. Re:3 lies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he he, I work for them now telling people this....and isn't it grand when you go through the training and they give you the truth, but you can't tell the customer the truth? hrm....good ol tech corps...

    2. Re:3 lies.. by Kythorn · · Score: 2

      Which is the third lie, that you were sorry, or that you worked for dell?

    3. Re:3 lies.. by Aus-Rust · · Score: 1

      sound like the third lie was a composite he was sorry he worked for dell

      --
      one day I'll have a .sig all of my own
    4. Re:3 lies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Which is the third lie, that you were sorry, or that you worked for dell?

      You must be one really dumb son of a bitch:

      1. I'm sorry you're having problems, ma'am.
      2. Our computers are reliable
      3. and we rarely recieve customer complaints.
    5. Re:3 lies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're even dumber... Plus you're a rude and ugly bastard.

      1. He's sorry that he worked for Dell

    6. Re:3 lies.. by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Just a guess:

      "I'm sorry you're having problems"
      "Our computers are reliable"
      "we rarely recieve customer complaints"

    7. Re:3 lies.. by laserweasel · · Score: 1

      that i was sorry, of course. :P

      --
      ["Marge, I agree with you - in theory. In theory, communism works. In theory." - Homer]
    8. Re:3 lies.. by laserweasel · · Score: 1

      well, i'm sorry about that, too..

      --
      ["Marge, I agree with you - in theory. In theory, communism works. In theory." - Homer]
  33. Song: "The Reviewer" by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 3, Funny
    A funny excerpt from http://www.networkcomputing.com/705/705song2.html :
    We are just reviewers,
    And the vendors, without fail,
    Try to tear down our resistance,
    With an avalanche of vapor,
    Such are promises.
    All lies and jest,
    Still we only hear what we need to hear,
    And we decide who's best.
    ...
    Lie, lie, lie.
    Gosh they vendors, how they lie.
    See them cry,
    Lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie

    Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

    1. Re:Song: "The Reviewer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, aren't you the freak that's stalking Michael?

    2. Re:Song: "The Reviewer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just read that website. Wow, that is really quite scary ..

    3. Re:Song: "The Reviewer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a loon. I love kooky people online.

  34. NEC by Emugamer · · Score: 2

    I'm sure some of you have purchased PBXs for your works at one time or another so let me tell you my little story.

    Around 18 months ago it was announced that we were merging with a larger non profit in a way to save on administrative costs amoung other things... IT was not really talked to for the majority of the merger talks but then when it was announced, we had to come in and clean the mess. 18 months later everything is fine (replaced ageing computers and cut 1/2 the IT staff) but the PBX system in the meantime was a hassle and a 1/2. Some idiot suggested that for the 10 months that we were in 3 "campuses" that we needed to switch to a single vendor integrated solution. Alright I'll admit it, the idiot was me. But it was a good idea, most people didn't relate to anyone else in the other agency and getting on an integrated phone/computer system would help bridge some of the problems. The problem was the vendors... Computersystems were easy, we would do all the implementation so all we had to do was buy hardware... so we spend 100,000 on some new dells that have been the most reliable machines I have ever seen, no upkeep in terms of hardware and have only had to reinstall one machine. Now to the PBX system... ugh... I probably spent 160 hours talking to different vendors with their great supre fix all solution that in the mean time would save us 20k a year....
    Alright the pitch was good, but there is a catch right? right? of course.. the salesman low balled the equipment price in order to make the sale and therefor wasn't to stringent on how the install went. so after the install was complete, we spent around 35k in service calls getting the system to where it needs to be and what was actually bid. Lawsuits are in the works but its most likely not worth it....

    1. Re:NEC by JLester · · Score: 1

      Did you pay them first? I work for a school system and never sign off on bills to be paid until the work is complete to my satisfaction. You'd be surprised at what vendors will do to make you happy and meet the bid specs when they have a large outstanding bill.

      Jason

      --
      "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
  35. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I must say I have not had a blue screen of death yet with Windows2000. I have however had many black screens of death.

  36. XBox by ksb · · Score: 4, Funny

    The guy in my local computer games store telling me I should replace my ps2 with an XBox because 'Microsoft are far more reliable at fixing bugs and delivering patches' and apparently 'No, they wouldn't charge gamers for said updates or release an in-compatible games box in 6 months to replace it'

    1. Re:XBox by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, I've heard very good things about Xbox's customer support, at least in the hardware department. I've heard of people who had their defective console replaced in 3 days. Sony on the other hand is notorious for not giving a shit once you actually own the console.

    2. Re:XBox by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      The guy in my local computer games store telling me I should replace my ps2 with an XBox because 'Microsoft are far more reliable at fixing bugs and delivering patches' and apparently 'No, they wouldn't charge gamers for said updates or release an in-compatible games box in 6 months to replace it'

      And you're claiming this is a lie why?

      I don't see Microsoft charging for updates (no updates yet - although the next issue or so of XBox mag should have an expansion pack for DOA3), and news for you: it has been six months. Where's the incompatible games box?

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    3. Re:XBox by x136 · · Score: 2

      I don't see Microsoft charging for updates

      *cough*Win98SE*cough*

      No, it's not Xbox related, but Microsoft has in the past charged for what should have been free updates.

      --
      SIGFEH
    4. Re:XBox by Cylix · · Score: 2

      I think what he means is...

      Have you tried to run a game that requires DirectX 8 and your installed version is 7?

      Bingo, update/feature enhancement that killed backward compatability.

      I'm not complaining, generally the updates are worth it and I doubt this would happen on a console system. Then again, strangers things have happened.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    5. Re:XBox by MrHat · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you needed a "patch" for a PS2?

    6. Re:XBox by be-fan · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Maybe because the PS2 software has yet to need *any* patches? This whole "patch" thing is more or less unheard of in the console world. The only bug I've ever seen in a PS2 game is in FF-X, where the text will sometimes smear due to the way the game engine does the water wave effect. In fact, the only time a console has ever crashed on me is once in 1996, when my N64 crashed playing Mario. Most computer users would kill for 6 months without a crash, much less 6 years!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    7. Re:XBox by FFFish · · Score: 2

      *cough*WinME*cough*

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    8. Re:XBox by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Actually...the DVD software..

      The Audio and video would get out of sync after an hour or so of playing.
      (This might be a PAL only problem if others outside of Australia haven't encountered it)

      The upgrade to the DVD software that comes with the DVD remote fixes that (and has now been included in recent consoles)
      And as far as I know, you are not able to get that update without buying the DVD remote.
      I bought the remote just for the update...as contrary to what people would have you think, the controller is actually the easiest way to navigate a DVD, especially in the dark.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    9. Re:XBox by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      *cough*Win98SE*cough*

      No, it's not Xbox related, but Microsoft has in the past charged for what should have been free updates.


      They only charged for the new features. You could get all of the bugfixes and service updates as a free download.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    10. Re:XBox by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      thats cause it is contracted out to Solectron.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    11. Re:XBox by shyster · · Score: 2
      I think what he means is... Have you tried to run a game that requires DirectX 8 and your installed version is 7? Bingo, update/feature enhancement that killed backward compatability

      I think you may be missing the point of backward compatibility. Things are said to be backwards compatible when they are the same as the previous version OF THE SAME PRODUCT. Obviously, App1 v5.0 is not backwards compatible with App2 v7.1. They're not the same app!

      DX8 is backwards compatible with DX7. That is, DX8 externally performs and acts the same as DX7, for everything DX7 does. External programs don't know the difference.

      Your scenario would mean there would never be any updates, because my new program requires a Pentium-233 MHz, which means it killed backwards compatiblity with my 486DX-33MHz. Gotta compare apples to apples you know.

    12. Re:XBox by Silver222 · · Score: 3, Funny
      WinME was a downgrade. Doesn't count.

      --
      "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." Bill Hicks
    13. Re:XBox by AvatarADVathome · · Score: 1

      What DVD driver revision are they on now? 2.1? Something further than that?

      The PS2 is a great game system but stinks as a DVD player...

    14. Re:XBox by Flassh81 · · Score: 1

      Yo my friend works at a Software Etc. ITs sort of pathetic when the key chains Microsoft gives u to promote XBox says Xbox on one side and has the number 1800-fix-xbox on it. Also i can confirm it, but he said that if something inside the xbox breaks, its programmed to display on the screen in 8 languages "your xbox is broken. Please call 1800-fix-xbox." He also mentioned that machine breaks out of the box so much cause of its weight. So be careful when they grab it from the back room..god knows if it fell on the floor and comitted suicide.

    15. Re:XBox by BJH · · Score: 1

      Just like to mention that in Japan, the now well-known 'disc grinder' problem resulted in the following reaction from Microsoft:

      1) Denied that there was any problem with the Xbox.
      2) Then said that the grinder problem was a 'natural effect' of friction in the Xbox.
      3) Then said that only a very few users had experienced any problems.
      4) Then said that they would accept requests for repair
      5) Then they admitted they still did not know what the problem was.
      6) Then said they would assess whether or not any particular Xbox qualified for repair only after they received it.
      7) Then said that they would not announce any way to determine whether or not your Xbox had the problem, as this would lead to people 'damaging their Xbox deliberately and sending it in for repair in order to inconvenience Microsoft'.

      And this is *good* customer support?!

    16. Re:XBox by Lord+Javac · · Score: 1

      The only game I've had any problems with is Crazy Taxi. It makes you wonder if Sega is bitter.

      --

      End of Line
    17. Re:XBox by exodus2 · · Score: 1

      This is just not ture of direct X backward compatibility. I had dx 7 installed on my game computer, it mostly had childrens games for my daughter, Jumpstart kindergarden, Elmo somthing, Freddy fish. I installed dx 8 for a game for myself and some of her games stoped working. I had to buy a new box for her games to run on. Then we got into the problm where I bought a 60 gig hd and the games said I did not have enough space to install them. I had to partition the disk to get them to install.

      --
      .sigs suck, thus nothing here.
    18. Re:XBox by I.+M.+Bur · · Score: 1

      Of course. But it actually upped the date. Update means "newer version", upgrade means "better version" :)

    19. Re:XBox by demon · · Score: 1

      Is there any way to update the PS2's firmware? Like, download CD image, burn to CD, put CD in PS2? Or are you stuck with whatever was burned into your PS2 when you got it?

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  37. Microsoft Lies by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've assembled a few of Microsoft's most outrageous lies at:
    http://www.kmfms.com/whatsbad.html#deception
    They've really churned out more material than I can keep track of (I have a large back-log of links to add to this list), but there are some good ones there. The funniest one on the list (IMO) is the interview where Bill Gates is quoted as saying Microsoft software has no bugs.
    1. Re:Microsoft Lies by swb · · Score: 2

      The link on the front page so no presntations, which presumably means no sales shit, either.

      Obviously Microsoft employees (not "gold partners" or any of that crap) did not actually come to your office and say that shit to your face, so it doesn't count.

    2. Re:Microsoft Lies by Ross+Finlayson · · Score: 1

      Microsoft may be evil, but none of their web pages commit the sin of having white text on a black background :-)

    3. Re:Microsoft Lies by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2
      Microsoft may be evil, but none of their web pages commit the sin of having white text on a black background :-)

      Fair enough. Try this link instead (same page, but printer friendly without the colors). I really do normally avoid white text on black backgrounds, but the artwork dictated otherwise for KMFMS - I'm not one to argue with BRUTE!.

    4. Re:Microsoft Lies by Binky+The+Oracle · · Score: 1

      Just three weeks ago, an MS sales rep and her techie-in-tow told me (along with our enterprise group), "Yes, Microsoft Sharepoint and Content Management System is a fully cross-platform solution for document management and will work seamlessly with Macintosh and Unix clients."

      We know that it doesn't, we just wanted to see what they'd say when we asked.

      --

      Slashdot comments... splitting hairs since 1997.

    5. Re:Microsoft Lies by sheldon · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the other side of Vendor lies is anti-Vendor lies.

      For instance, this quote:
      "Did you realize 486's are still useable machines if you're running something other than Microsoft's latest software? For instance, Linux worked great on 486's back when they were the top of the line and amazingly enough it didn't stop working on them once the Pentiums came out. "

      You know what? The same is also true of Windows 3.1. The release of Windows XP didn't suddenly make Windows 3.1 stop working.

    6. Re:Microsoft Lies by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2
      You know what? The same is also true of Windows 3.1. The release of Windows XP didn't suddenly make Windows 3.1 stop working.

      Perhaps I should have been more precise - much of the recent Linux software will still run fine on older machines. The same cannot be said for Windows 3.1. Microsoft stopped supporting Windows 3.1 a long time ago. Good luck trying to get recent software to run on Win3.1. On the other hand, recent Linux software runs remarkably well even on older hardware. I have an old Pentium 90 running a recent version of Linux, including a recent firewall, recent NAT, recent Apache, recent NFS server, etc. I think it's pretty clear that the same availability does not apply to Windows 3.1 - sure you can still run it, but you will be stuck with old, outdated applications.

    7. Re:Microsoft Lies by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 5, Funny
      Microsoft may be evil, but none of their web pages commit the sin of having white text on a black background :-)


      You mean, like MSDOS?

      -- this is not a sig.
    8. Re:Microsoft Lies by AugstWest · · Score: 4, Funny

      My favorite line from Microsoft will always be one of the blurbs from the Win95 installation:

      "Everything you do will be more fun"

    9. Re:Microsoft Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The release of Windows XP didn't suddenly make Windows 3.1 stop working

      of course , you've "fixed" this little oversight now, haven't you?

      will XP just stop working if people don't upgrade once the next version is released?

    10. Re:Microsoft Lies by scm · · Score: 1

      "Windows 95 is not based on DOS"

    11. Re:Microsoft Lies by shyster · · Score: 2
      I have an old Pentium 90 running a recent version of Linux, including a recent firewall, recent NAT, recent Apache, recent NFS server, etc. I think it's pretty clear that the same availability does not apply to Windows 3.1 - sure you can still run it, but you will be stuck with old, outdated applications

      No, I don't know of those services being available for Win 3.1. But I could easily install Windows 95/98/98SE or even Windows NT 4.0 Server or Workstation on your Pentium-90.

    12. Re:Microsoft Lies by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2
      No, I don't know of those services being available for Win 3.1. But I could easily install Windows 95/98/98SE or even Windows NT 4.0 Server or Workstation on your Pentium-90.
      I don't think so. NT4.0 Workstation requires 16MB of memory with 32MB recommended - my Pentium-90 only has 14MB. Sure, you could install NT4.0, but it would crawl. Linux is humming along nicely without a sweat.

      That's kind of beside the point, though. Windows 95 is already not supported by Microsoft. Windows 98 is about to be moved to the unsupported category as well. What happens if you are running Win95 on a computer now and some massive security hole is exposed that Win95 is vulnerable to? Answer: you're screwed. Microsoft does not support Win95, so you cannot expect a patch from them if you are running Win95 on your old hardware. Now, what happens if you are running Linux on your old hardware and a security hole is discovered? Answer: you either download the latest version or you can patch the source code yourself. For this reason alone, Linux is a viable option for older hardware while Windows is not - it would be irresponsible to rely on software that is an unsupported black box that is ignored by the only organization with the necessary information to fix it (i.e., the source code).

    13. Re:Microsoft Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, nice of you to mod me down as Overrated because I disagree with you, jerk.

      "sure you can still run it, but you will be stuck with old, outdated applications."

      But then, so are you. Go ahead and try to run GNOME on your Pentium 90... I dare ya. By running your Pentium 90, even with Linux, you have limited yourself to a small subset of applications.

      But regardless, you claimed that the old 486 wouldn't work at all because Microsoft released Windows XP.

      That's a lie, FUD, whatever you want to call it.

    14. Re:Microsoft Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you new to Linux?

    15. Re:Microsoft Lies by Tablizer · · Score: 1
      In your link

      "The Bloatware Debate" is a technical discussion of how two separate people dissected one particular Microsoft program and found out, to their shock, that it was over 2,000% larger than it should have been.

      The link appears dead. Is there another copy floating around somewhere?

    16. Re:Microsoft Lies by kz45 · · Score: 1

      Answer: you either download the latest version or you can patch the source code yourself

      1) 90% of people will not code a fix themselves

      2) isn't this equivalent of getting a 98 upgrade for 95?

      if you're still running win95 or win3.11, you should probably upgrade anyway. (as you should if you are running an extremely old version of a linux kernel).

    17. Re:Microsoft Lies by paulm · · Score: 1

      I'm not exactly a Microsoft fan, but I have to tell you, and I'm sure that many will agree with me, that Sun did just as much to kill Java, by trying to control the language while producing crappy jres and compilers, as Microsoft did, by producing greate jres and compilers and subverting the language.

    18. Re:Microsoft Lies by Coleco · · Score: 1

      In a way, Gates' comments make sense. I have to call you on this one because I think he's telling the truth (in parts of what he says). Think about it. MS didn't release WinXP to fix bugs in win2k, did they? No, WinXP is way buggier and slower, but has more features. The bugs then get fixed with service packs. Win2k runs quite well for me thank you.

      And then he says:

      "There are no significant bugs in our released software that any significant number of users want fixed."

      You could argue that that's statiscally true, if, say, there are a million users, 1000 bugs that each randomly affect 1000 computers.

      More importantly, he could easily argue what you define as a 'bug'. Is an awkward aspect of the interface considered a bug? Maybe, maybe not. Also when you're dealing with a huge number of hardware and software vendors with there own buggy software, it really compunds the problem. In fact now that I think about it, I'd say 90% of the problems I've had through the years with MS OSs has been with buggy drivers and hardware.

    19. Re:Microsoft Lies by AVee · · Score: 1

      "Windows 98 is not based on DOS" "Windows ME is not based on DOS"

    20. Re:Microsoft Lies by dylan_- · · Score: 2

      I guess it's this

      dylan_-

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    21. Re:Microsoft Lies by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      The release of Windows XP didn't suddenly make Windows 3.1 stop working.

      Probably because Windows 3.1 never actually worked well in the first place.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    22. Re:Microsoft Lies by armb · · Score: 2

      > Bill Gates is quoted as saying Microsoft software has no bugs.

      Be fair. He said no "significant" bugs. Meaning the suckers keep buying the stuff, so why bother fixing it?

      --
      rant
    23. Re:Microsoft Lies by gdr · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand them, what they mean is: "Everything you do will be more fun than installing Windows 95.".

    24. Re:Microsoft Lies by fat_mike · · Score: 1

      I still love:

      Please sit back and relax while Microsoft Windows 98 installs on your computer.

      I still think the programmers should have had a "Start Panicing" message popup at about 96% installed.

    25. Re:Microsoft Lies by Aus-Rust · · Score: 1

      this brings to mind my two favourite windows sayings
      BUGS COME IN THROUGH OPEN WINDOWS
      and
      Error message 000001 - unexpectedly intelligent user found !

      --
      one day I'll have a .sig all of my own
    26. Re:Microsoft Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everything you do will be more fun"

      An old friend of mine, who I roomed with when we were still doing desktop support, was always having to reinstall W95 for some reason or another (he was always in DLL hell). And then, during one of his installs, that quote appeared on an installation banner. He called me over to look at it.

      Simultaneously we looked at each other and shouted, "WHEEEEEE!"

    27. Re:Microsoft Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except that linux works well and Win 3.x does not.

    28. Re:Microsoft Lies by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      I've run Enlightenment (16.3, I believe) with X 3.3.6 on a Pentium 133 w/ 48M of RAM w/ a res of 800x600@16bit. (1.2G scsi-1 drive and nitro 3d graphics card w/ 2M RAM for the other system specs)(the Stormix distro w/ the 2.2 kernel - I don't recall what the codename was). It ran quite well(quickly, responsively, whatever you want to call it), was useable, and stable. Please note that this was over a year ago, when E was -the- state of the art in desktops. This same system was unable to run Win98 (or WinNT for that matter) quickly at all, and it was incredibly frustrating to use. It was classically unstable, and had the usual windows symptoms. Please note that the linux software in question was much, much 'newer' than the old, outdated Windows 98 or WinNT (SP4, if I recall correctly).

      Given enough RAM (192M, say?), (due to X 4.x's high memory req's) older systems (say, a P2/ppro 200) can run modern desktops without a hitch. Win2k is pretty iffy on even 350's w/ the same RAM configuration, and that's 2 years old!

      Don't even get me started on servers - I've got quiet a few 'old' desktop systems serving as office servers for various tasks. (P75's, P200's). Please note they're mostly running Debian Woody, some running potato. This is 'new' software, if you recall. No version of Windows could even begin to perform the job that these servers do. I suspect it would take twice as many, twice as powerful systems to carry the tasks at hand.

      Please try and become informed before opinions are formed.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    29. Re:Microsoft Lies by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Ahh! but you cannot upgrade a 386 to WinME or XP
      Thats the whole point!

      On the other hand, getting updates for a linux distro is quite easy

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    30. Re:Microsoft Lies by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with that?

      Yellow text on a white background is a sin, but white on black?

    31. Re:Microsoft Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And WTF is so wrong with white-on-black text? As long as it's white, and not some 70% gray artsy shit, it's just as readable, even more so, because you don't have the bright white pain-inducing background.

    32. Re:Microsoft Lies by awx · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? You're using a P133 as an example of an old machine? When you've worked with linux/VAX, you may post about this topic again. One hundred and thirty-three MEGAhertz? I'll be lucky...

      --
      Feel that power? That's mah MOUSING FINGER
    33. Re:Microsoft Lies by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      Ok, what about the 33Mhz 486 that I use as a iptables/smb/ftp/http/ipsec system? 12M RAM, and quite responsive throughout (as much as could be expected at 33Mhz Intel, at any point in time).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    34. Re:Microsoft Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > if you're still running win95 or win3.11, you should probably upgrade anyway. (as you should if you are running an extremely old version of a linux kernel).

      The older versions of the Linux kernel are still being actively maintained, and will be so long as there is a userbase and sourcecode.

      Will you be able to say the same about Win9x once Microsoft stops supporting it? Might be different if they'd release the source to those gen-2 OSs and let their users assume the ongoing maintenance, but, ...

    35. Re:Microsoft Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft may be evil, but none of their web pages commit the sin of having white text on a black background :-)
      You mean besides every single page on the www.microsoft.com website?
  38. Re:Good point.... by josh+crawley · · Score: 1

    You unknowingly brought up a good point. The Athlon PR rating is a great example of corporate Bull Shit. AMD was screaming and yelling when they broke the 1gHz barrier. Now they're stuck at something like 1433 mHz but they compare at 2.2 gHz P4. They just call thier chip Athlon 2200 XP.

    note: even though I'm blasting Athlon and AMD, even an overclocked p4 at 3.5 gHz still can't beat a new Athlon. I'm just pissed that AMD does idiotic PR crap when thier prices and speeds sell thier chips.

  39. recipes by 56ker · · Score: 1

    When they say on the back of packets - only takes twenty minutes - it'll only take twenty minutes if you have the shopping delivered to the door, have an oven that preheats instantly and someone to prepare all the ingredients for you!

    1. Re:recipes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how about those food packets that say serves 4-6! Ha! I'm lucky to feed myself on most of them!!

  40. Microsoft discrediting Linux by Metrollica · · Score: 1
    --



    --Metrollica
    1. Re:Microsoft discrediting Linux by Bahamuto · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite quote will work fine here..
      Linux is only free if your time is worthless

    2. Re:Microsoft discrediting Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true, but in the same way, Windows XP is only $299/license if your time has no value.

    3. Re:Microsoft discrediting Linux by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

      Linux is only free if your time is worthless

      And Windows is only $100-$300 if your time is either a) worthless or b) you can fix random crashes, eliminate fun viruses, solve stupid bugs, understand obfuscated software, and deal with all the other general crap in 0 time. And you don't mind installing MS spyware and adware.

      And before you remind me that XP and 2K don't crash as much and things aren't all that bad - remember that about half of the Windows users are still on the 9x's, and won't be leaving too soon. Yes, microsoft has done a lot of good in bringing PC's to the masses in a (fairly) user-friendly way, but please don't say that windows maintenance is free. or even that much cheaper than running a linux system.

      --


      Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
  41. Give Microsoft a lifetime achievement award? by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 1, Troll
    http://www.microsoft.com/catalog/default.asp?subid =22
    Windows XP Professional delivers the new standard in reliability and performance.

    Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

    1. Re:Give Microsoft a lifetime achievement award? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, aren't you the freak stalking our beloved Michael?

  42. write your own operating system ... by beanerspace · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yup, that's what the salesman told us back in 1984 or 1985 in some computer store downtown NYC.

    My friend/co-worker, Mike X. decided to go to CompuLand or something like that, to see the new line of PC clones. When we got to the store, someone straight out of Saturday Night Fever began to pitch us a system with the integrity of a used car salesmen.

    When we started asking questions about the operating system, he perceptively asked us, with a wonderfully Broolynese accent "... you guys are programmers, right ?"

    He went on, now with a bit of body English "... well I'm a programmer, you're a programmer ... you know ... you can write your own operating system ... I did."

    Appearently Mike had the same thought at the same moment I did ... only he voice his "... hey, if you can write an operating system, what are you doing here ?"

    Needless to say, the salesguy left us alone from therein.

    1. Re:write your own operating system ... by cpeterso · · Score: 5, Funny


      Appearently Mike had the same thought at the same moment I did ... only he voice his "... hey, if you can write an operating system, what are you doing here ?"

      ... and that salesman's name was Linus Torvalds!

    2. Re:write your own operating system ... by BlameFate · · Score: 1
      Oh god.. now I can't get the visions of Linus in a white disco tux (ha! - so that's where the penguin's name comes from!) with huge lapels doing his thang on a underlit dancefloor.

      Nooooooo.

      --

      --is not to be confused with user #672982 - Bame Flait

    3. Re:write your own operating system ... by DoasFu · · Score: 1

      Hey, maybe he could right his own OS... maybe he even had, and Bill Gates tricked him into selling it for a pittance. It could happen to you...

    4. Re:write your own operating system ... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1, Funny

      Q: What's the difference between a used car salesman and a computer salesman?

      A: The used car salesman knows when he is lying.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:write your own operating system ... by ShawnD · · Score: 1
      Q: What's the difference between a used car salesman and a computer salesman?

      A: The used car salesman knows when he is lying.

      A2: The car salesman knows how to drive...
    6. Re:write your own operating system ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard a similar one...

      Q: What is the difference between a marketing guy and a salesman?

      A: The salesman knows he's lying

    7. Re:write your own operating system ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh god.. now I can't get the visions of Linus in a white disco tux (ha! - so that's where the penguin's name comes from!) with huge lapels doing his thang on a underlit dancefloor.
      Nooooooo."

      Disco, Disco Tux.

      ;-)

    8. Re:write your own operating system ... by smallpaul · · Score: 2

      What's the difference between a computer novice and a computer salesman? About a week.

    9. Re:write your own operating system ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer #2:

      About two weeks.

    10. Re:write your own operating system ... by ratkins · · Score: 1

      Q: What's the difference between a used car salesman and a computer salesman?

      A: The used car salesman knows when he is lying.


      ... And the used car salesman can probably drive.

    11. Re:write your own operating system ... by JPawloski · · Score: 1

      Appearently Mike had the same thought at the same moment I did ... only he voice his "... hey, if you can write an operating system, what are you doing here ?" ... and that salesman's name was Linus Torvalds! And now you know... the rest of the story.

    12. Re:write your own operating system ... by rehannan · · Score: 2

      And now you know... the rest of the story.

      Close, but not quite. It's actually

      And now you know... the rrrrrrrest of the story.

    13. Re:write your own operating system ... by mediahacker · · Score: 2, Funny
      Naaaa - it was probably Bernard Shifman

      http://www.petemoss.com/spamflames/experiences.htm l

    14. Re:write your own operating system ... by Aus-Rust · · Score: 1

      so you are saying that a computer salesman can become a computer novice in only 2 weeks ?

      --
      one day I'll have a .sig all of my own
  43. At Comdex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was some software engineering app out there. I asked the people about it and they claimed it could detect infinite loops in code without running the code. I asked them if it could detect all infinite loops, they said yes.

    If you know anything about decidability and undecidability you'd know they were full of crap.

    1. Re:At Comdex by andybak · · Score: 0

      and I've got a new compression routine that will compress anything by at least 1%

  44. Number of users and what users are doing by sourcehunter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Company providing a huge piece of software for one of my clients - "It has been tested and we have X (don't remember exact number - greater than 5) using it remotely." We ask - how? Terminal services? VPN? PCA? "Oh directly over the network, some via a 56k dialup". Uh huh. Most were using PCA (unacceptable for my client's applications). None were using terminal services, and none had implemented the package in anywhere but the home office.

    I had to write a special app just to get it to work on terminal server. Running it over a Point to Point T1 line was too slow, so even the folks in customer's biggest remote office (connected via the FULL point-to-point T1) have to use terminal services.

    Same company: oh, sure the database is stable. And the ODBC driver works well.

    FEH

    Can't complain too much - their bugs keeps my company busy and hence well paid.

    --

    quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
    1. Re:Number of users and what users are doing by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Sounds *exactly* like a software package in use at my company. Exactly:(

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:Number of users and what users are doing by sourcehunter · · Score: 1
      What software package is it, if I may ask?

      Respond out of band using my email address above instead of posting it.

      --

      quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
  45. When service would be available. by ipsuid · · Score: 4, Funny

    A few months ago I moved to where I currently live. I called Comcast (the only cable company choice here) and asked if cable modems were available. After getting my address the service rep on the line replied "Absolutely. Would you like to setup cable service now?"

    Happy, I went through the process of setting up an account. I was told that once the cable was installed, I could call back and setup the cable modem account.

    A week later, cable installed, I call back. "Sorry, they aren't available yet". hmm. I asked when they would be. "Next week." I was disappointed, but hey, only a week.

    I called back a week later. Now it was a month. I called back a month later, now they weren't sure, and I got a "Well, people in that call center don't know what they are talking about."

    Two months later I call back. Still not available. By this point I had DSL installed (a whole 'nother story). I made one final call to get them to remove service (The only reason I got it to begin with was because of the cable modem!)

    BTW, the whole time this was going on, several neighbors and I were all getting fliers from Comcast to sign up for cable modem service.

    --
    It appears Ockham lost his razor and grew a beard.
    1. Re:When service would be available. by AnalogBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Be glad. Comcast makes @home, at their worst, look good.

      Limited NNTP Service. They dislike it when you run servers. They really dislike it when you have a NAT. Their mail service is pretty unreliable, sometimes working fine but sometimes taking hours to send or recieve a message.

      They won't even talk to you if you dont have their software installed.

      one of my calls with them went like so:

      "Whats your mailserver address?"
      "Install our software and it will set all that up for you, in addition make some highly technical changes to your system to improve the performance of our software"
      "is that what i asked you?"
      "Its all we can tell you."

      I explained to them that I am the only person i want making changes to my system.. as i was irritated.

      Ugh.. i want an ISP with a clue. I'll get DSL once i find a new job. anyone know where i can find a new job?

      Maybe i'll start my own ISP.. with a advanced support option over the phone that says "If you have a clue, press the digit corresponding to the difference of the number of layers in the OSI Model and the DOD model. Otherwise, press one to speak to our customer support center."

      Comcast's local support number actually has the audacity to state: "If you have not installed the comcast software press 1. If you have installed the software, press 2."

      If you press one, it says "Please install the software, downloadable from www.comcast.net/connectioncenter/, and call back *hangup*".

      thats just wrong on so many different levels.

    2. Re:When service would be available. by lkaos · · Score: 2

      Ha!

      About 3 years ago I called up Comcast asking about cable modems. No dice, Comcast had just acquired Jones Intercable (my former cable company) and were upgrading old software. Scheduled to be available in a year.

      Called up a 8 months later when the school that's about a mile down the street got cable. Still not available, the school was an 'experiment' to see how the equipment would work. Wait a few months, we'll call you when it's ready.

      About a year later, still call up again. Got nice little run around about it being available and actually signed up but was later called up and told that it turns out it wasn't available but would be real soon.

      Finally I decided about 3 months ago to see if it was available yet. What was I told? Will be available in a year.

      Oh well, no high bandwidth for me :(

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    3. Re:When service would be available. by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 2

      I've had the same experience with Comcast. Personally, I don't believe they really have any cable modem customers, nor that they really provide any high speed internet access of any sort, andthat their ads are all just a sham :)

      I mean, if it was available, I'd have it now, right? hehe

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    4. Re:When service would be available. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It always amazes me when I hear stories about Comcast. Sometimes I think I'm the only one who's never had a problem with their high speed internet service. Unless you count the 5 -6 times their Internet software crashed during installation, removing IE5.5 and Entourage and installing IE5 and Outlook Bloody Express instead... No downtime worth mentioning in over a year, that's not bad, I'd say.
      On the other hand, I ordered DSL from SNET in February 2000, didn't hear back from them, so in January 2001 I went with Comcast. I still haven't heard back from SNET, 2 years later, all calls went unanswered, etc...

      If you want service from Comcast, live in the New Haven area, they like us up here...

    5. Re:When service would be available. by choco · · Score: 2

      A few years ago BT (British Telecommunications) started offereing a CLI ( caller ID) service.

      When making calls you could prefix the number with 141 to prevent your number being disclosed to the called party.

      It was also possible to have your line changed, Free of Charge, so that the default was NOT to release the number, but if you the prefixed the number dialled with 1470 - it would release the number to the called party.

      BT decided that

      a) They didn't want people to select the "default withhelf" option

      b) That one means they were going to use was to deny that the "1470" to release Caller ID even existed.

      I have several telephone lines. Some were set to default withheld and some not. I phoned sales to change the status one of the lines. I had time on my hands so I decided to have some fun.

      So sales answer and I say what I want. They immediately start down their standard script designed to talk me out of it. As each point was raised I countered with a reason why it didn't matter to me. One of my counter-arguments revolved around using 1470 to over-ride the default. The salesman denied that the code existed or that it would work. I stated that I had already used the code many times and it had worked just fine. He told me I must be mistaken. I said I had a line to hand with a Caller display box and another line to hand set to default "with-held". I then made him sit and wait there while I went through the experiment. I then asked him to explain what I observed (which was 1470 working perfectly). The situation was laughable. I knew he was lying. He knew he was lying. he knew that I knew he was lying and he knew he was defending the indefensible. However he was not allowed to deviate from the official line...

      BT policy has now changed. They now admit that 1470 works and they now allow "default withheld" without reading the 101 good reasons why you shouldn't first.

      --------------

      I also some fun at the expense of a dodgy company in London who were running a premium rate sex-line service using some very dubious business techniques. I decided to bait them. So I made a ten second call from a number which would normally get no incoming calls. I then waited for a call from their billing department. Everytime they called they got another load of lies and rubbish from me. The game was to see how many times they would attempt to get the name and address before they finally gave up. The answer was over 30.

      Amongst other gems - I played a message saying "I'm sorry, this number has changed, please call again earlier". They rang back three times to hear that one. Sometimes I just told them blatant lies - like I was a curry house and gave an (almost valid) address as an almost uninhabited Scottish Island.

      When I was feeling really bored I'd set the system up to relay all calls back to one of their own chat lines.

      --
      AJB
    6. Re:When service would be available. by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1


      Although my experiences were quite a bit better than what others have described, they were still pretty shotty at times. I have been using Comcast for quite a while now, seems like several years before the @Home fallout at least. But before the network switchover when @Home died, I had cable set up and had bought 3 IPs (I used 1 as an experimentation link, 1 as a main stable link for my various computers, and 1 for the rest of the people/computers in my household). I had decided to see exactly what the software they supplied us with in the mail actually did. So I loaded up a fresh test system and installed it - nothing, just bloated the system along with IE6 (or 5.something I don't remember exactly). So, I concluded that everything would work after the switchover and I wouldn't need to change any settings on any of the computers on the cable. So, time went by and we entered the switchover phase, everything was still working (well, besides the abhorid slow service and random fall outs in the network) - I was in the clear. Then a little time passed and we were nearing the point at which supposedly the systems without the software installed would stop working. This time came, shit hit the fan, and all of the links from my cable died except 1. So I called up tech support several times and was run around in circles for a while. I knew it wasn't the software since at least 1 link worked. I called tech support some more and apparently I needed to have my account "rebuilt" to include the additional IPs. Ok, fine, maybe the info doesn't transfer over to their new systems or whatever. I call and have the account rebuilt, the remaining links work... for a day or two, then they die again. So I call tech again and ask them what happened - told me that I needed to have my account rebuilt *sigh* I already did that - well, let's just do it again. Other links alive again... well, for a day or two again. This circus goes on for another couple weeks. At one point I was routed to some call center that told me additional IPs would not be allowed for several months (despite paying the extra $10/month for them) - wasn't sure what to think of that. But I ended up calling tech again a while later and this time I was routed to the call center. Through calling several more times to have the account rebuilt, they ended up sending a guy to my house (I have no clue why, he just showed up one day, heh) and he had the account rebuilt through whatever place he communicates with. All in all I ended up rebuilding the account somewhere in the neigborhood of 10 to 15 times. That was annoying.

    7. Re:When service would be available. by madstork2000 · · Score: 1
      Two summers ago Comcast called my parents house selling their @home service. My parents say sure, comcast takes their billing information and sets up an installation appointment. Two days later they call back, saying "sorry its not available on your street. . .maybe in a couple of weeks." A month later they call, "maybe in a month or so." Acouple of months later the same story. . . They eventually gave up calling and renewed their dialup service. (DSL is not available either).

      About two weeks ago a comcast sales person calls, asking if they would like theior new highspeed internet. Thinking that they have finanally got their act together after the @home fiasco, my parents again say sure. Again give their billing info and set an install date. The day before the install date Comcast again calls saying its not available it may be in a month or so. . .

    8. Re:When service would be available. by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

      Verizon started advertising DSL in my area by sending out flyers about *1 year* before it was avaliable. We got several flyers, and when you called to ordrer, they would take your name and tell you basically to sit tight and it would be here soon ... meanwhile they'd keep mailing you flyers telling you to order

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    9. Re:When service would be available. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Comcast has been promoting their digital television and cable for about two years in my area. Guess what? No cable internet. They do actually have cable in some places, but woe to those who try to set up a home LAN

    10. Re:When service would be available. by argonaut · · Score: 1

      Off topic but ...

      I currently have "AT&T Broadband" service. I am scared that when the sale of this service to Comcast goes through I will get screwed. Why do some companies suck so bad and some are great?

    11. Re:When service would be available. by eudas · · Score: 1

      i bet it makes some dogbert at that company wag his tail ferociously when he thinks about it, though.

      eudas

      --
      Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
    12. Re:When service would be available. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O my God.

      I am so happy I never got a straight answer from them either. I had Comcast cable (with a really nice, um, converter) and wanted cable modem. I called their office and asked when it would be available. They said it was in testing and would be ready in about a month. One month to the day I called back - same story. Then I pressed a little more and said I needed the most bandwidth I could get and was going to buy a 56K modem ($200 at the time) but would not spend the money if I could get cable modem a month later. That was the woman I was speaking to actually came clean and said it would probably be about a year. I bought the modem.

      About a year later I called again and asked about cable modem and was told it would be another year. That was about four or five years ago and I don't think they ever did setup service. The last story I heard was, "We are waiting until everyone else does it to see what mistakes they make so we don't make the same ones." No shit.

    13. Re:When service would be available. by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      Comcast's local support number actually has the audacity to state: "If you have not installed the comcast software press 1. If you have installed the software, press 2."

      If you press one, it says "Please install the software, downloadable from www.comcast.net/connectioncenter/, and call back *hangup*".


      Hilarious. A living example of the old joke about TV in the Soviet Union. It had two channels. Channel 1 was state television. Channel 2 had a KGB agent saying "tune back to channel 1."

    14. Re:When service would be available. by Control-Z · · Score: 1

      For the last 4 or 5 years I've been calling Adelphia (a cable company based in Florida) to see if cable modem service is available in my area. Every time they say 6 months to a year. I'm starting to get a little skeptical.

      Now that they've raised my rate another $5 a month, I'm very tempted to tell them to cancel my cable, and to call me back when they finally get cable modem service in my area. I can get satellite in the meantime, for less money. More channels although I won't get local stations.

    15. Re:When service would be available. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...advanced support option over the phone that says "If you have a clue, press the digit corresponding to the difference of the number of layers in the OSI Model and the DOD model.

      I didn't know an obscure piece of trivia constituted a clear sign of any intelligence or cluefulness.

    16. Re:When service would be available. by ipsuid · · Score: 1

      Also off topic... It boils down to company culture and attitude. I've worked for major corporations from both sides of the ballpark. The ones in the middle just don't make it. The ones who are in it to make money end up screwing everyone over and hating their lives. The ones that want to change the world, end up doing just that - but also end up being those few gems out there (usually).

      --
      It appears Ockham lost his razor and grew a beard.
  46. Most outrageous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Sure! We can meet that requirement. No extra charge."

    After the meeting: "So what did I promise him?"

  47. And the reverse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    as a person working for a company, what is the biggest lie a customer has told to you?

    And how deep a hole have they dug themselves with their lies before backing down?

  48. Re:My Vote: Windows by 56ker · · Score: 1, Redundant

    How about :
    This time our OS won't cr....
    Abort, retry, or ignore?

  49. Dont forget "Real Soon Now" by Evil+Pete · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And who can forget the Ashton-Tate PR guy who stated for the press that DBase IV would be out "Real soon now". Didn't come out for another 18 months. Unwittingly coined a classic description of vapourware. In fact I gotta feeling that debacle was also one of the first instances of the term "vapourware".
    Basic lesson , don't trust them ... even if its in writing.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
    1. Re:Dont forget "Real Soon Now" by BrentWM · · Score: 1

      Remember when there was a rumor that Lotus and Ashton-Tate were going to merge. The new company would be called. . . "Late."

    2. Re:Dont forget "Real Soon Now" by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      Duke Nukem Forever???

      Whats it been, 4 years now? Perhaps more?

      --
      Rod Taylor
    3. Re:Dont forget "Real Soon Now" by Jay+L · · Score: 2

      I think "Real Soon Now" was coined (in its capitalized, ironic form) by Jerry Pournelle in Byte.

  50. Bill Gates by Ruliz+Galaxor · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "640k should be enough for anybody."

    1. Re:Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are 4 minutes late, mista :)

  51. YHBT. YHL. HAND. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sad but true, dude.

  52. master of all vendors GIL by CRAssEsT · · Score: 1

    Gil: D'ah, she's a beut'. You can't beat a Coleco, eh ...? How many can I put ya' down for, a lot? Please say "a lot," I need this. Aw, thank God! Now, let's talk rust-proofing. These Colecos'll rust up on ya' like =that=, er ... shut up, Gil. Close the deal ... close the deal!

    --
    --rock me like a huricane? NO rock you
    1. Re:master of all vendors GIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dance for ya? But you won't even see...ah ah, alright, I'm a-dancin', I'm a-dancin, ya da da de da da

    2. Re:master of all vendors GIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice Simpsons reference.

  53. Monster cable! by lkeagle · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It will reduce the 'skin effect' for better sound, and the arrows on the side indicate that it should be plugged in in that direction, because the electrons flow better that way." -- pimply 18 year old at The Good Guys

    ~Loren

    1. Re:Monster cable! by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      A friend of mine has a pair of monster speaker cables that cost $500.00. He didn't buy them - a wealthy friend of his owns an audio/video store. these things are about 1" in diameter each, oxygen free, blah, blah, blah, blah..

      And i don't notice a bit of difference between those and my $20.00 monster cables. I just don't. Maybe its because im not an audiophile.

    2. Re:Monster cable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is such a common abuse, check out Kimber Kable. These guys are fsking insane. And /. the heck out of Ambrosia; they sell a Consignment (read USED) pair of 10ft. speaker cables @ $10,000+.

      This is idiot abuse.

      Support your local idiot, replace all "audiofile" wire with lamp wire. NOW!!!

      I know I'm paranoid about this wire thing, but it's getting us too. Have you heard of Belkin. They destroyed cheap computer wires. What's next. "Sir, those jumper cables are going to be $10,000." "No thanks, I think I'll just leave the car where it is."

    3. Re:Monster cable! by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1

      Audiophiles listen to their equipment, the rest of us listen to our music.

    4. Re:Monster cable! by ShawnD · · Score: 1
      And i don't notice a bit of difference between those and my $20.00 monster cables. I just don't. Maybe its because im not an audiophile.
      And I likely wouldn't notice the difference between that and old extension cord.
    5. Re:Monster cable! by sharkey · · Score: 2

      And i don't notice a bit of difference between those and my $20.00 monster cables.

      Amen. Instead of shelling out $50-$60 for a 6' digital coax at Ovation, I bought a $9 6' digital coax at the hardware store. Seems to work pretty damn well. the 100s of feet of coax I've bought at hardwares stores to extend my cable TV in various residences works damn well, Comcast's claims to the contrary.

      The CAT-5 connectors and jacks at Lowe's, on the other hand...

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:Monster cable! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Funny

      I remember reading about an experiment; a guy took a coat hanger, plugged it from his DVD player to a good reciever, and watched it count the Dolby Digital bit errors - 0.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    7. Re:Monster cable! by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      hehe!

      just curious about your sig - i've seen it around quite a bit - how long have you been a member of the gloriously unemployed? If you'll excuse my assumption

    8. Re:Monster cable! by laserjet · · Score: 2

      you are a good guy, sharkey. i have enjpyed your posts for years.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    9. Re:Monster cable! by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of a Belkin or somesuch "modem cable" that was molded and had gold conductors for faster dialup internet connections. Sheesh.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    10. Re:Monster cable! by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I bought a $9 6' digital coax at the hardware store.

      Heh, you could have gone even cheaper, like me.

      6 ft. extension cord with a broken prong: Free.
      Two RCA jacks: $0.50.
      Solder: $0.10
      Knowing that people don't believe you: Priceless! :)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    11. Re:Monster cable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the cable you speak of. Inside is basically CAT-5 twisted pair cable.

      Its funny because the phone cable costs more than the network cable from the same company, even though the cabling inside is virtually identical (except missing one pair for the phone cable)

    12. Re:Monster cable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, it all depends on your audio system. If you have a $100,000 set, well, I guess shelling $5,000 per cable is okay. (A wealthy friend of mine did ... and it DID made a difference - I heard it and it's not even subtle). For your Sony boxes, I guess it's all money down the drain.

    13. Re:Monster cable! by jayaredk · · Score: 1

      why does one of my all time favorites come up: Jealous Guy;

      its so clear that you guys dont know what you are talking about. I invite you all to drop by (Copenhagen, Denmark) with all your cables for a listening session. Cables do mather, equipment do mather, its basicly essential for the entire listening experience.

    14. Re:Monster cable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Electronics australia put it years ago when discussing Monster cable "We are of the opinion if
      no measurble difference can be found there is no difference.
      Most times people replace a very small diameter cable with this stuff where in fact any cable with a lower DC resistance would have the same effect even extension cord for mains power.

      Just proves the gullibility of even tecnical types eh......

    15. Re:Monster cable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh No! He's making fun of my dick-size compensation device, quick, call him jealous.

      Oh, Puh-leeze!

    16. Re:Monster cable! by awol · · Score: 2

      I soooo agree. I used to work for a guy who was a bit of a genius when it came to analog electronics. (Television design history, knowing the part catalogs off by heart etc etc). Anyway his standard reply to anyone who wanted to sell this "super quality cable" was "Can you hear grass grow?" to which the only honest answer is no, "Then you can't hear the difference between this and brand X" At which point he just bought lots of good multicore copper and saved mucho deniro.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    17. Re:Monster cable! by jayaredk · · Score: 1

      maybe its just the plain old 'to assume' as in 'assumption is the mother of all fuckups'-thing.

      all im saying is this: don't assume that speaker cables (and other essential equipment) does not mather, because it in your opinion is expensive.

      There is a noticable difference between using a cheap cable and e.g. the MIT Cables (http://www.mitcables.com). Of course the difference with a Sony stereo is probably next to nothing, but if you have a Mark Levinson-setup, its an entirely new world.

    18. Re:Monster cable! by mudshark · · Score: 1

      hoo boy, this takes me back....

      See the following thread in rec.audio.pro. Start reading at message number 13.

      nyuk, nyuk

      --
      In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
    19. Re:Monster cable! by demon · · Score: 1

      At which point he just bought lots of good multicore copper and saved mucho deniro.

      Mucho Deniro? Isn't he related to Robert DeNiro?

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  54. Hehe from the company I was Working for by YuriPup · · Score: 1

    Our Tapeback up system is capable of saving 160 Gigs of data an hour. The client was on a 10BaseT lan, and the throughput on a 10 Mbit lan is abou 4 Gig an hour. To get the 'advertised' though put they would have needed to upgrade their backbone to Gigabit. Nothign like being hte tech having to explain that limitation our system is you network backbone.

  55. How may cpus do you want by spribyl · · Score: 1

    Sun guy once told me that thier servers would scale linerally. Every CPU you add will not add any over head. Needless to say we did not buy anything from these guys.

    1. Re:How may cpus do you want by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Well, each CPU could add just 1% productive instructions, and it would still be linear, right?

      /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:How may cpus do you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine Scale Exponentially

    3. Re:How may cpus do you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - sun told me the E10K will have about 1 hour of downtime per year it is so redundant. I have four, and 3 of them have been down a combined 20 weeks in the past 52. They are crap, and we will NEVER EVER EVER buy sun again. They said it was secure as well - which again is total crap.

    4. Re:How may cpus do you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sunfire line blows HP out of the water. IBM attempts to place their Regatta against the E15K, which is like positioning a Ford F150 against an eighteen wheeler. For actual real-world application performance Sun is still tops, and they don't have to disable half their cpu's in the benchmark to do it. The redundancy, availability features, and serviceability features of the SunFire line is unmatched by anything else currently offered in the market.

      Was your E10K downtime due to CPU failures? There were some ecache problems they've had to work through on the USII cpus.

    5. Re:How may cpus do you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roughly speaking the "sun guy" is correct. Solaris is *the* most efficient operating system in widespread use today at utilizing multiple cpu's. On a 24 cpu 6800 with a single domain, you're going to see about 23 cpu's worth of utilization. That's damn good, that's around 94% - HP and IBM typically have processor utilization rates in the 70's to 80's.

      So, instead of Sun you bought, what, a Superdome? Or one of IBM's various different platforms (please say Regatta)? Thus showing us all your vast skills in perceiving the underlying truth overlaid by a manufacturer's marketing spin to implement the technically superior and most cost-effective solution? Oh please.

    6. Re:How may cpus do you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All processes have (what is effectively) metadata. There's an overhead in talking to more than one processer becaues there's more metadata involved in assigning the process to a specific CPU. With multiple CPUs there can be no truncation though assumptions about which CPU was intended unlike a single CPU.

    7. Re:How may cpus do you want by dublin · · Score: 2

      Well, actually, this is pretty darn close to the truth for applications that are threaded. IIRC, Oracle ran about 28x as fast on a 30-way UE6000 as it did on a single processor of the same speed. (To be fair, there are darn few apps that are really written to take advantage of threading, Oracle is one of the best...)

      I know this is hard for some Linux folks to swallow, but that's the reason some of us really love Solaris - it scales more linearly that anything else I've encountered. It's not exactly linear, but for well-written apps, it's pretty close...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    8. Re:How may cpus do you want by elbles · · Score: 1

      Solaris does indeed scale well, but IRIX beats even Solaris in terms of scaling to larger systems; I've yet to see Sun produce any system to the scale of SGI's top stuff (Origin2000's, IIRC).

  56. Its a turn key solution by Revek · · Score: 1

    These are often used lies by venders 1. Its a turn key solution
    (This means you will need a crowbar and a BFR) 2. There are no bugs in this software (To me this is a sure sign you have a real wanker for a salesman) 3. Its Infinitely scaleable ( I have only heard this one once but hey once is enough) 4. You Can achieve 100% uptime (heh no words are Adequate to describe this one)

    1. Re:Its a turn key solution by ader · · Score: 1

      I believe the 'n' in "turn key" is silent. "Turn key" means that after turning the key, you can only resort to kicking the box when it doesn't work, because you don't have manuals or any way of debugging the problem.

      The phrase "100% uptime" should be qualified with "in my fevered and ignorant imagination".

      Ade_
      /

      --
      Big Bubbles (no troubles) - what sucks, who sucks and you suck
  57. Re:Good point.... by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Back in the 1GHz days, the Athlon and PIII were comparable MHz for MHz. The P4 and Athlon XP are so different that comparing using clock speed simply isn't possible.

    While the PR scheme is a bit dodgy, what do you expect them to do? When a customer comes in to a shop and sees "2.2GHz!!!!!!!" for the P4 and "1.667Ghz" for the Athlon XP, which do you think they'll go for? Unless they're one of the clued in types, they'll fall for the larger number.

  58. Advertising for Windows XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suddenly everything clicks.

    Ummm... shouldn't that be: "Suddenly everything freezes"?

  59. Sales culture is to blame by scubacuda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Has anyone stopped to ponder the sales culture that encourages this hype?

    Show me a sales rep who is patient enough to sit down and listen to the specifics of what a product does and doesn't. I have worked in sales for a long time, and I've seen one, maybe two who can. (Oddly enough, these guys were ENGINEERS before they become sales clowns.)

    Too many sales reps thrive on the intangible: possibility, maybes, etc. Put them in front of an Excel sheet (or WORSE) a white board, and you're REALLY in for a doosy. I see my own people committing these atrocities in meetings with customers. I then have to then gracefully butt in and "clarify" what the assclown has just promised.

    It's also sick to see them all assemble together. These fuckwads get drunk and there's no stopping the information warpage. I have seen sales goons literally gut a company that once had a bright future.

    1. Re:Sales culture is to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this anything like a guarentee of 1ms ping time between HongKong and Toronto being written into a contract?

    2. Re:Sales culture is to blame by set · · Score: 1

      They stay together because if you can single them out, it's easy to dominate someone as weak-spined as a sales rep.
      Grouping together for protection, to maintain their small, filthy place in life.

    3. Re:Sales culture is to blame by superflippy · · Score: 1

      I have seen sales goons literally gut a company that once had a bright future.

      That happened to me. The sales people at a place I used to work (doesn't exist anymore) stopped selling our most popular product and instead tried to sell stuff we didn't know how to make. Who on earth ever told them that was a good idea?

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    4. Re:Sales culture is to blame by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      At the same time, these sales idiots can really help out a floundering company.

      Don't know what your direction is? Well, who's the one talking to the people who make decisions at the companies making contracts with you? The sales guy knows what your customers want to hear your product does...so you might as well just make it do it.

      Of course, development of this type is totally unsupportable and encoruages the worst design imaginable. But it keeps you in business to strike with a really great product when you finally figure out what it is you want to do.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    5. Re:Sales culture is to blame by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      I have seen sales goons literally gut a company that once had a bright future.

      IIRC Best Buy lost their contract with Apple because their sales reps were calling the computers junk and to some extents, rufusing to sell them. This behaivor was encuraged by the managment because the I Mac's didn't make as much cash as the rest.

      When I was working there I would have to swear to all that is Holy, that I was the smartest person in there. I worked in car audio and was the only one who knew what the "W" meant (not the word, but atually what a Watt was) after the description of a Subwoofer. The computer guys were worse than that. I switched over to shelf-stocking because I knew that they were basically expected to be stupid dolts. Turns out, there were the other smart people working there.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    6. Re:Sales culture is to blame by scubacuda · · Score: 1
      IIRC Best Buy lost their contract with Apple because their sales reps were calling the computers junk and to some extents, rufusing to sell them. This behaivor was encuraged by the managment because the I Mac's didn't make as much cash as the rest.

      This is where the organization has to take the responsibility. Sales reps don't get away with anything that an organization doesn't let them get away with.

      As long as an organization focuses on the "hard sell" at the expense of alienating customers, vendors, etc., then it will lose rapports that prove *more* valuable in the long run.
    7. Re:Sales culture is to blame by danielrose · · Score: 1

      Our sales guys do that at work, and we quite like it that way.
      Seriously, it wins us a lot of business and we can expand quite well.

      "Can you do XYZ."
      "Yes."
      "Can you do XYZ + LMN?"
      "Yes."

      If we don't know how to do it, we find out how to. If we need more staff, we buy them and of course it costs the customer accordingly.
      Of course, this only works if what they promise is actually possible :)

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    8. Re:Sales culture is to blame by Jon+Howard · · Score: 1

      Has anyone stopped to ponder why it is that people are so readily stereotyped?

      I don't know about you guys, but I am not defined by my job - my job is selected based on some conjunction of the skills I currently hold or wish to develop further. Consequently, the behaviour I manifest when doing my job is not decided in advance for me by the common culture of that job but by my understanding of how to best accomplish the goals that the job entails. Perhaps the distinction is that I don't ask how to do my job, but what my boss expects me to accomplish - then I work out the rest to the best of my abilities.

      On that same note, I'm not a white man in the USA, I'm a free individual who happens to be male, caucasian, and living in the US of A. Some people would argue that there's no difference, I merely extend the idea that it's a matter of priorities: what labels do you treasure most, and how does that affect your thinking and behaviour?

      ...Back to the idea of performing my job without referring to the instruction manual: A common trend in business is to micro-manage through bureaucracy - many positions come with a manual which is intended to help maximize efficiency by ensuring that employees are as disposable as the time it takes to train them. Consider the cost of making your life less difficult by simply following instructions: you can always be instructed to be replaced; much like a VCR, the instructions from one employer are not likely to be applicable to another. You only benefit from the enhanced ease if you do everything you can to stay at one job, if you're layed-off it's a whole new load of training when you're hired elsewhere.

      In other words, don't be lazy and avoid stereotypes.

      (by the way, I've been working at Franz, Inc. for almost 1 year now. I love it, the whole office is friendly, I learn something new every day, and even though I've been sick for weeks, everybody's supportive and helpful. Here's to hoping we can all find a group of folks as great as they've been to me.)

  60. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    assistant administrator?
    for 17 pppl? man, most admins i know are on a ratio 1 admin to 100-150 users (machines)

    assistant lol

  61. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your motherboard blows.

  62. Re:Apple takes the crown by feldsteins · · Score: 2

    "...advertising the Mac as being 2x faster than PCs. Though they dont technically lie, the way they present their data is the same thing..."

    No argument there. Although this is didn't used to be such a "lie," in the last couple of years it really became one.

    "For some reason people see Apple as being a good corperation, not like the evil variety such as MS..."

    People see them that way because that's what they are: a good company. They sell fine products at prices that people are willing to pay and that people are highly satisfied with. They don't kick puppies and they don't pinch babies. Not that I've heard anyway.

    Now Microsoft, on the other hand... ;)

    --
    You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
  63. Even funnier by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    In my area we have the cable company advertising that "with cable additional outlets cost a fraction of satelite" then 2 seconds later they advertise their digital service [which doesn't cost a fraction per outlet].

    To boot they removed the movie channels from normal cable so really if you want to have even a chance of watching something interesting you have to get digital cable.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Even funnier by cicadia · · Score: 1

      Well, 5/3 is still a fraction :)

      --
      Living better through chemicals
    2. Re:Even funnier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just subscribe to netflix.com.

    3. Re:Even funnier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just figure out they're easy-to-guess url naming system for pay movies

  64. boy I know what you mean... by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is partially true, on a mhz per mhz comparison. I found a Lightwave benchmark site at http://www.blanos.com/benchmark/index.html , it shows that in nearly all cases the Mac was significantly more efficient, mhz wise, to the PC. But what it doesn't show is the price per performance ratio. 1gig Macs just recently showed up at a time when PC's were at 2 gigz. They perform roughly the same.

    Figure Athlon into this, and the benchmarks get more interseting. An Athlon 4 1.2 gig rendered a scene in 130 seconds, a Macintosh 867 took 271 seconds. I think both those processors came out about the same time, but that's a big difference, dontcha think?

    In any case, I agree with you. Marketing has a way of twisting the numbers to their favor. It's funny how if you narrow a perspective a bit, you seem a lot more favorable.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  65. Dell by cscx · · Score: 1

    They promised me a live and talking Steven in the box with my new system. Dude, those lying bastards!

    1. Re:Dell by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Steven's cute. Dude.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    2. Re:Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I would buy a new Dell too if I thought Steven was gonna come with it. He's fine as hell.

  66. Local tech support by Refried+Beans · · Score: 3, Funny

    We had a local PC vendor where I grew up that told some tall tales. One teacher in our school bought a PC from him. She was having a hard time getting her sound card to work. He told her that she needed to bring her computer in to him so he could download the drivers _off_ the card.

    1. Re:Local tech support by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

      Much like my old "slimeball of a boss" (Office Space quote intentional) which loved to confuse his customers into his overpriced tech. prices because "Well our techs had to clean out all of the corrupted DLL files *in the registry*... heh.. what an ass. He knew he had no idea what he was talking about. Maybe that's why he loved selling to our local retirement community the most. Easy sells.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    2. Re:Local tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's funny, but I actually have a card that you can do that with - download the drivers off the card.

      It's a SCSI card for an Apple II made by CV Technologies in the late 80s, and it has a ROM which contains the drivers. When you install the card the rom appears a disk image and you can copy the files from it and run the configuration utility. Clever.

    3. Re:Local tech support by danielrose · · Score: 1

      I have always thought this would be a good idea.
      No more distributing fucky drivers with the operating system, no more kludging the fuckers to work.

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
  67. Conversion of old database by Kris_J · · Score: 2
    We bought a new database because we were told that the old one would be converted to the new system. After a month and a half we finally got the "converted" database back. All they'd done was import the tables -- a process that would take maybe a whole afternoon. They hadn't even linked variables, they certainly hadn't converted any forms or reports. It took me 6-9 months to fix that problem and I never did get a fix for the fact that one part of the program was incapably of displaying/handling dates in anything but American MM/DD/YY format -- I'm in Australia (DD/MM/YY).

    The database package in question is DB-Text (version 3). I won't mention the national distributer's name as they'd probably sue me.

    1. Re:Conversion of old database by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Similar issue:

      Got a project from a client - well, half a project. We got the 'web' half, and the other team got the 'database' half. The database was SQL7, but that team said it had to be upgraded to SQL2000 - they'd handle the whole thing.

      For some reason, the first 7 weeks we weren't allowed to know who the other team was. Turns out they were down the road from us. Well, we coded against the spec we were given. They didn't. They 'upgraded' the SQL7 to SQL2000 database.

      Guess how? Using the 'upgrade' wizard which would have taken about 20 minutes? Nope - they apparently recreated everything by hand. About 50 tables, maybe 20-30 columns each. This apparently took them 8 weeks. Oh, yeah, this was the best part:

      Every column in every table was VARCHAR(50). Didn't matter what it used to be.

      *THEY* got paid. *WE* got stuck essentially recreating/upsizing the SQL7 -> 2000 database (absolutely no reason to, except that that's the only DB they now had) and had to do that in about 2 days while debugging the code we were working on.

      VARCHAR(50). For everything.

    2. Re:Conversion of old database by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      VARCHAR(50). For everything.
      Imagine Jay (from the Kevin Smith movies) going 'Hol-eeee SHIT!' and you've got my reaction. Oh, and for the record, I'm going to get this put on a t-shirt.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Conversion of old database by sigwinch · · Score: 2

      LOL! That's one of the funniest things I've ever heard.

      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    4. Re:Conversion of old database by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

      the program was incapably of displaying/handling dates in anything but American MM/DD/YY format -- I'm in Australia (DD/MM/YY).

      I'm in america, and my preferred date format is CCYYMMDD. :-)

    5. Re:Conversion of old database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot resist mentioning that the other team simply was smarter one.
      They managed to get paid and fuck you in the process.

    6. Re:Conversion of old database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >*THEY* got paid. *WE* got stuck essentially recreating/upsizing the SQL7 -> 2000 database (absolutely no reason to, except that that's the only DB they now had) and had to do that in about 2 days while debugging the code we were working on.

      That wasn't the right way out. You should have re-written the code to work with their varchar crap. When it runs slow and poorly you get to blame it on them and next time you get the business. Plus you get the added business of getting to redo the work! Woohoo!

      But now they look like the gods and you guys look like the clods (even though it is actually the other way around). Sorry that you got the short end of the stick but next time remember to ream it back up their a**. :)

    7. Re:Conversion of old database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds familiar:
      Right now our athletic department is waiting for the "fix" on an access db they(without IT's
      knowledge or approval) agreed to purchase as an
      update to their "old" access db.
      The first version was crappy enough, but when you
      start talking MS access, a distributed db environment,licences, and halfassed vb hackers
      from a small company in BF you really have a
      soup sandwich.
      Episode:
      The scheduling applet croaked and when the bug was reported the company rep reported that it
      was a new bug and that they would have to rebuild the db :"table by table". That was three
      weeks ago. The db is basically unusable, though
      through it you can cause gpf's in kernel32 at will. Which is kind of fun.

      As a result:
      When I got exasperated enough to finally ask why
      the AD had upgraded they told me the sales guy
      from asinine vb hack corp had told them that
      the upgrade was easy, the new DB had many more features and it was 100% bug free.
      Doh.

      These kind of decisions are not unique in the
      work environment and usually center around some
      clown coming in to help his wife and fscking
      up the environment, or a faculty memeber being helpful who destroys a workstation or brings on a virus epidemic.
      I long for a structured, informed environment
      with a healthy regard for stability and testing.
      Anybody know of one?

    8. Re:Conversion of old database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American, Australian... all your dates are fucked up. There is one and only one date format everyone should use: yy[yy]/mm/dd. What's the possible excuse for anything else? What kind of a sick date is 02/04/01? What format is it in??!?!

  68. all mine are from the same vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • "Sorry we can't reproduce that bug here in our testing lab, must be a configuration problem on your end" - two months later it's added to the bug list
    • "It's compatible to any level of HTML support that you want" - as long as it's below HTML 2.0
    • "It's fully ECMAScript1.3 compliant"
    • "Rapid Application Development" - if your application consists of "Hello world" otherwise it will be four times slower.
    • "It has everything you need in a webserver, an IDE, HTTPserver, mail, loadbalancing, failover, templates, debugger, database connectivity, source control, it's all built right in" - true it's built in, none of it works but it's still built in.
    • "No really you don't have to learn Java" - unless you want to build an application
    • "It's all drag and drop and point and click, super simple" - yes it's a drag and we'd love to drop it and point our fingers and 'click' be gone!
    • "You can create an application without ever typing one line of code" - the app won't perform any function but we're still going to label it an 'app'
    • "We're the number one Java Application server on the market" - at the time they were the only Application server written entirely in Java
    • "We're fully [J2EE][HTML3.2][ECMASCRIPT][CSS][INSERT YOUR BUZZ STANDARD HERE] compliant" - does anyone know what compliance means
    • "As standards change we'll change with them"
    • "I'll get back to you on that", "I don't know, I'll get back to you on that", "that's not really my department I really work on [X] but I'll check with [Y] and get back to you on that"
    • "That will be fixed in version 2.0.1", "That will be fixed in version 2.4.0", "That will be fixed in version 3.2.1", "That was fixed in version 3.2.2"
    • "Noone else reported that as a problem", "We've never heard that before"
    • "Work arounds for bugs in this system are very simple"
    • "Not enough people reported that particular problem to warrant a fix"
    • "It works fine for me"
    • "We're committed to customer service"
    • "We have over 500 corporations using our product including SWbell, Microsoft, HP, IBM, Oracle, Coca Cola" - should read '500 corporations who purchased our product', '3 who want to reverse engineer it to make sure it doesn't infringe on their IP, 4 who purchased it because we have a partnership, 6 who purchased it because they're friends with the boss, 100 who have purchased it because they are selling it or training it, 4 who are actually using it to run the worlds simplest websites, and 383 who just flat got suckered in and have since shelved the product (unless someone hasn't let them).'
    • "It's platform independent"
    • "It will lower your development costs"

    I could go on and on, I'm sure someone out there can put a name to this company so I won't.

    1. Re:all mine are from the same vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammn you have just restored my faith in browsing at 0

      MODERATORS ON CRACK !

      I have heard all these lies before.

  69. how about Oracle? They're pretty good liars by WildBeast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't you guys remember when Oracle started advertising their database server as unbreakable?

    1. Re:how about Oracle? They're pretty good liars by beta21 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Their database server is unbreakable as long as you don't start it.

    2. Re:how about Oracle? They're pretty good liars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Started? They still do.

    3. Re:how about Oracle? They're pretty good liars by udittmer · · Score: 1

      I have not seen any story of an Oracle DB being broken/broken in since - it's their app server that was shown to be vulnerable. Their naming scheme is confusing, though, both DB and app server have "9i" in their names.

  70. NeXT by Darth+Cider · · Score: 1

    Sure it costs $10,000, has black and white display, couldn't deliver on its promise of direct to disk video recording, doesn't have much software, and requires learning Objective C, but it's nothing short of revolutionary.

    1. Re:NeXT by asobala · · Score: 1

      Then OS X.

    2. Re:NeXT by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      The NeXTDimension never did the mjpeg recording, unfortunately. Otherwise, you're wrong as hell.

      It has tons of software (which I use to this very day.) You don't have to learn ObjC unless you want to program at the GUI. You can use C, C++ (with your favorite modern egcs), perl, etc.

      It sure is revolutionary. All the geeks I know are getting hardons for Mac OS X.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    3. Re:NeXT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a troll? Please expand on your comment...

    4. Re:NeXT by asobala · · Score: 1

      :P No...

      I mean cocoa on OS X is based on NeXT, is coded in Objective C (argh!) and yet kicks all other toolkits out of the ballpark.

  71. Licence? since when? by oo7tushar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Our product will integrate seamlessly into your system. Just tell your developers to read the documentation and within minutes they'll modify it to match your needs"

    Licence agreement says: Any modification of code is prohibited. Use of external code to modify databases created by our program is prohibited.

    Remember to send at least 10 copies of that line to the purchaser in the company. It's important they read it prior to signing the million dollar deal. It's your ass on the line, not theirs.

  72. When you try selling something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...verify that is something POSSIBLE...
    4/5 years ago a commercial tried to sell to a customer of ours a web site about translation...

    You could browse literal works with a browser; on the left frame there should have been the original version and on the right the translated version (the customer had already the transaltions, obviously)

    In his opinion the end-user would have been able to click on a word in the left frame of the browser to see the "translated word" highlighted in the right frame..

    We stopped him just in time... but it was hard to make him understand that

    1) there wasn't the technology to do it (frames were NEW those days)

    2) the only way to link a word on the left frame with one on the right was to hire 5.000 people to create links between them (or using AI... that was out of the scope of a simple web site)

    3) since they were literary works there was hardly any thing like a "translated word"!!!
    (they were REAL translation, not crappy word-by-word translations...)

    And he got angry with us because we "ruined" a sure contract :-D

  73. They told us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bush wins.

  74. Post above: not intended as flamebait. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Okay, just to be clear, if you are reading this as "I'm trying to piss off anti-MS people..." then I ask you to read it again. I'm talking about actual experience here with what I believe to be a good OS. The only reason this would draw 'flames' is because people are hard set in their opinions about MS. I can't do anything about that. I'm hoping maybe that if they see that there are people in the world doing just fine with MS, then maybe they'll open their minds a bit to alternatives like MS out there.

    Trust me, if I were going for flame bait the post would have been rather different. I've been given 2 points for being insightful so far, take that as an indication that at least 2 people thought I wasn't trying to start a flame war.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  75. MS Windows by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1

    As seen while installing MS Windows

    Microsoft Windows 95: The best windows yet!
    Microsoft Windows 98: The best windows yet!
    Microsoft Windows ME: The best windows yet!
    Microsoft Windows XP: The best windows yet!

    Other favorites:

    Windows is more secure than ever!
    Windows is easier to use than ever!

    At least Linus doesn't say "Linux 2.5.5: The best kernel yet!" Maybe Linux marketing gurus should take that into consideration as to why the Linux-on-desktops marketshare is so small ;)

  76. five biggest lies i've bought into by cosmo7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1: a massive 16K of RAM (1980)
    2: a massive 512K of RAM (1985)
    3: a massive 8M of RAM (1991)
    4: a massive 128M of RAM (1996)
    5: a massive 1.5G of RAM (this weekend)

    1. Re:five biggest lies i've bought into by csbruce · · Score: 1

      The really strange thing is that if you were to mathematically model these claims, the numbers double every 12-18 months.

    2. Re:five biggest lies i've bought into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not really, considering that's how he got his figures. (what, you don't think his memory's that good, is it?)

    3. Re:five biggest lies i've bought into by TeldakSS · · Score: 1

      correction: a MASSIVE 1.5 PETABYTES of RAM. nuff said.

    4. Re:five biggest lies i've bought into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmm.. Yottabyte

      "hmMMMmm, you seek yotta"

    5. Re:five biggest lies i've bought into by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2

      I noticed your curve is shrinking. 512 is 32x 16. The rest are 16x greater than the previous number. Your last upgrade is 12x. In this case, I don't think you underpurchased. I think memory requirements are starting to slow down. You might get more than 5-6 years out of that upgrade. Assuming, of course, memory PERFORMANCE isn't an issue.

  77. If I Told You I'd Have to Kill You by Starky · · Score: 1
    Of the many lies, big and small, I've heard in my years as a technical professional, the biggest unfortunately belong to former employers it would not be right to compromise in the telling.


    I'm guessing that any slashdot reader who has been in the technical arena for more than 10 years is in the same position.

    --
    -- My choice of computing platform is a symbol of my individuality and belief in personal freedom.
  78. Re: Guns by MutantEnemy · · Score: 1

    "Guns don't kill people. People kill people."

    This is like:

    "Toasters don't make toast. People make toast."

    --
    Grr! Arg!
  79. Re:Good point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PPC, anyone? MHz myth?

    You guys sound like Steve Jobs.

    LOL.

  80. XP by Kizzle · · Score: 1

    "Windows XP is the most secure OS ever" -Microsoft

  81. Re:Good point.... by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

    While the PR scheme is a bit dodgy

    A *bit* dodgy? It's like lying to your customer's face about how fast the computer is. Don't give me any of this B.S. about "the P4 and Athlon XP are so different that..."; the processors are being sold as things that they are NOT. Period.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  82. Re:What is CIO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did, asshole.

  83. All Your Base Are Belong To Us by AntiNorm · · Score: 5, Funny

    When all our base are clearly not belong to you.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
    1. Re:All Your Base Are Belong To Us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When all our base are clearly not belong to you.

      Shut up, Jar Jar!

    2. Re:All Your Base Are Belong To Us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When all our base are clearly not belong to you.

      well said.

    3. Re:All Your Base Are Belong To Us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You set us up the bomb!

    4. Re:All Your Base Are Belong To Us by vanguard · · Score: 2

      I've seen this so many times. Can somebody please explain what this quote is about? Did Bill G say it? I'm missing something. Everybody knows about this except me.

      --
      That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
    5. Re:All Your Base Are Belong To Us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.planettribes.com/allyourbase/

      Yes, I am too lazy to make it a link. So sue me.

  84. NT by PenguinX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft touting "Zero Administration" when Windows NT 4.0 came out. My boss was like "we'll save so much!!! I can't even project the numbers!"... tisk tisk. Good thing I told him to wait until the marketing hype died ;-)

    1. Re: NT by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Microsoft touting "Zero Administration" when Windows NT 4.0 came out. My boss was like "we'll save so much!!! I can't even project the numbers!"... tisk tisk. Good thing I told him to wait until the marketing hype died ;-)

      10-15 years ago the trade rags were full of blurge about "Fourth Generation Programming Languages" that would let even managers write their own programs (with the implicit promise that they could ditch their IT staffs).

      Of course, at the time I worked for a boze who asked every month why the previous month's pounds ordered didn't equal its pounds shipped, and also frequently requested reports that included totals for things with different units of measurement, so I never felt very much threat from the promised PHBPL.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:NT by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      It's 'zero' administration because you're supposed to expect a friendly hacker to break in & fix if for you :]

  85. Another great Mandrake lie: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux-Mandrake 8.2 is a stability release.

    1. Re:Another great Mandrake lie: by Cryolithic · · Score: 1

      8.2 has been working 100% for me.

    2. Re:Another great Mandrake lie: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite right, Mandrake has been stable for quite some time. No need for a stability release really.

      Its more like a feature release, or a number bumping.

  86. Relativistic Muffins by brandyn · · Score: 1
    Ok, so it's not in-person, but it's well documented:

    Optimistic Muffin marketting.

    Heh heh.

    -Brandyn

  87. Forgetting hte most important one by maddkow · · Score: 1

    you will never need more than 64kb of ram -Bill Gates

    1. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's 640K...

    2. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by mgblst · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure it wasn't 64 bytes??? Or 64 bits???

    3. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Tuzanor · · Score: 2

      it was "640K ought to be enough for anybody" not "you will never need more than 64kb of ram"

    4. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      Only, he never said it. It's not even true that DOS had a hard limit at 640KB. DOS ran on machines that were not IBM compatible. Xerox PC, 768KB. DEC Rainbow, 896KB. When will you people get it?

    5. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Nobody will ever need more than 640K RAM!" -- Bill Gates, 1981
      "Windows 95 needs at least 8 MB RAM." -- Bill Gates, 1996
      "Nobody will ever need Windows 95. -- logical conclusion

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    6. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone has probably "gotten it" already. Maybe it's just fun to waste people's (like you) time.

    7. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he did say it.

    8. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Sivar · · Score: 2

      OS/2 could run DOS and allow the programs to use chunks of memory that would otherwise be wasted, such as the mode 13h graphics memory (64000 bytes exactly). Ahh, I miss OS/2. Good thing we have Linux and FreeBSD.

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    9. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      Prove it.

    10. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      I'll spend my time how I want, buddy.

    11. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Andy would you quit screwing at slashdot around and bring us our coffee and donuts?

      billg

    12. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC, that was very poor. Give the man some proof or everyone will laugh at us.

      linus

    13. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nobody will ever need Windows 95. -- Microsoft, 2002

    14. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Nobody will ever need more than 640K RAM!" -- Bill Gates, 1981

      Except that it is not Bill Gates that said that, Cf. a recent Slashdot article.

      Funny post anyway

    15. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by vladkrupin · · Score: 2

      ...which is true. (or do you need Win95?)

      yeah, the comment is lame. I just wanted to join in and tell you that I am exceptionally amused by your logical conclusion.

      --

      Jobs? Which jobs?
    16. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by bobKali · · Score: 1

      Yea, I read an article somewhere where Bill claimed to have not said that, and also claimed to have invented Open Source.

      Who does he think he's fooling - everyone knows Al Gore invented Open Source.

  88. YHBT. YHL. HAND. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, you just dont stop do ya?

  89. Re:Good point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Slashdot math: 1 + 1 - 1 = -1


    Quit your fucking bitching. The difference between 49 karma and 50 karma is trivial.

  90. Q: Whats the difference between ... by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    A used car salesman and a computer salesman?

    A: A used car salesman knows how to drive a car.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Q: Whats the difference between ... by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 2

      Q: Whats the difference between ...
      a car salesman and a computer salesman?

      A2: The car salesman knows when he's lying to you.

      -- this is not a .sig

  91. College Network Services by secondsun · · Score: 1

    "Yes, we do know we are doing..."

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
  92. Ameritech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your T1 tests fine, it must be your equipment..(click)

  93. GIR by shiva · · Score: 3, Funny

    "It's not stupid, it's advanced!"

    1. Re:GIR by Ratface · · Score: 1

      I love this show.

      --

      A little planning goes a long way...
  94. Killer Instinct... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "Coming to your home in 1995, only on the Nintendo ULTRA 64!" -- the game Killer Instinct, if you can find that in arcades, very loudly says that hehe.

    For the uninitiated, the Nintendo 64 (ultra was dropped...) came out in 1996 with a whopping 2 games at launch.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  95. absolute worst lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    To me and my colleagues:

    "Yes, there's money in the payroll account."

    So we went to the bank that the checks were drawn on, to cash them directly. Once again, his lie bit him in the ass. That was the last time he told me that lie.

    Less than a year later, the loan officer controlling the credit on the store shut it down. Turns out the store owner lied through his teeth about how much business and inventory they had. It was a landmark, almost 100 years old, and now they tore it down and put a bank in its place.

    1. Re:absolute worst lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a landmark, almost 100 years old, and now they tore it down and put a bank in its place.

      The cads!

  96. what is the best milk frother? by dummkopf · · Score: 1

    while this is not computer hardware per se, it is still hardware and worth sharing: after having seen blade II with my wife, we went into the local cooking store (chefworks santa cruz) since my wife's milk frother, a piece of crap glass jar with a metallic mesh, had broken. we looked at the selections and of course they carried model A, the one she had and model B: a solar powered milk frother. uuuuuh! that sounds cool. does it also work? we ask the salesperson: "does this work"; answer: "yes, of course". "have you ever frothed milk with it?" ... [long pause] "no". solar powered piece of hardware did not make it home with us...

    1. Re:what is the best milk frother? by WasterDave · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how this relates to blade II, but I do know a thing or two about milk frothers - for cappunccino, presumably? You want a stainless steel one. Put it on the stove to get the milk warm/hot, then put it in the sink, hold the lid on with a sponge, and give it some frothing the milk. I have no idea why ours works so much better than the glass ones, except perhaps that since it's steel I'm not nearly so worried about beating the crap out of it. You hold the lid with a sponge because the milk usually comes glooping out of the hole at the top where the frother goes.

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    2. Re:what is the best milk frother? by shepd · · Score: 1

      Now that's strange. Solar powered milk using devices.

      And here I was always thinking that leaving milk out in the sun was a _bad_ thing...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  97. Playstation... by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The reason that Playstations are going bad is because people are misusing them." -- that's what Sony said when they had LOTS of returned, defective Playstations.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  98. Bill Gate's original sin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, maybe not original, but without it the PC landscape would be much different.

    When the PC was a gleam in IBM's eye and PC-DOS and CPM-86 were the competing (well, CPM-86 kinda rolled over, but ...) IBM Bigwigs asked Bill Gates at a meeting if his new PC-DOS OS would run CPM (CPM meaning CPM from the 8080 days) programs. Knowing it was a non-starter to tell them no, Bill Gates replied that it would indeed run CPM programs. I am pretty sure this is also documented in PC Roadkill, a fun afternoon read.

    Without this crucial early support from IBM into the OS for the masses business, MS would have been just another one of many today. Bill leveraged the results of that deal into the current MS.

  99. Maybe it doesn't count by evilpaul13 · · Score: 2

    but I installed Windows 98 this week (don't ask) and it said during the install it was the most stable and best performing version of windows ever, when NT4 was clearly better...

    1. Re:Maybe it doesn't count by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well XP claims (during installation) to start faster than any previous version of windows. However, installing 3.11 on any hardware capable of running xp will yield a startup time of well under a second.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  100. MHz for MHz? by asobala · · Score: 1

    If you look up hint (http://www.scl.ameslab.gov/HINT/) you'll find that the 1GHz machines have a measurable difference between them.

    1. Re:MHz for MHz? by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 2

      There was a measurable difference, but it wasn't in the order of a 750MHz Athlon would spank a 1GHz PIII.

      The old pre-TBird Athlons were slower at 1GHz than the PIII at the time. This was due to the cache running at 333MHz. When the TBird came out it was significantly faster than the PIII. However, they were pretty comparable, the major difference at the time was price rather than performance.

  101. Intel P4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a commercial on TV.

    Beings capable of interstellar travel.
    Looking with wonder at a P4???

    You gotta think that anybody capable of interstellar travel would have processors so fast that we could not even comprehend the speed or size of chip.

    Just ribbing intel on this one. A 2G processor is pretty awesome.

  102. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    17 users, add about 3 zero's and you will notice difference, hell just add 1 zero and you'll notice difference.

  103. EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by weave · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The nightmare I have had with this company after buying two of their SANs knows no bounds. After almost a year of begging and pleading, I still don't have a valid service contract with them. The sales rep promised me 3 years hardware 7x24 service on both systems and I still don't have anything in writing on this. I've bitched to all levels of the company as well. I get promises that this issue is getting attention from high levels of the company, and then silence.

    Then there's the software support service contract. It took me months to get them to bill us, then they send a bill for $16K, we send it in, then when it's time to place a service call it's "who are you again?". Our $16,000 is missing, no one knows where it is, even though I have a copy of the canceled check they cashed. We are now getting dunning letters demanding payment at the same time getting a cancellation notice on another contract we had with them along with a credit invoice. So now THAT system is up-in-the-air.

    They are the most screwed up company I've ever had the displeasure of dealing with. I won't even go into the crap software they use. Their linux fiber HBA drivers use sg version 3.0.16 for lk 2.2. When I tried to update it, everything broke. Turns out, and this was told to me from the driver's author no less, that sg version 3.0 was a development branch only, and that every minor release changed the interface and that EMC had *NO* business putting this crap into production. I ended up getting EMC code out of it (thank god I had source) and folding it into sg rev 3.1x under lk 2.4.

    The site engineer I have is the only bright spot in the entire company. He's trying to get my contract issues resolved. It's time critical, because I've heard they are farming out their higher ed contracts to Dell (which actually may be a good thing).

    EMC may be good to megacorps that spend 10s of millions a year on their "frames", but if you only spend a half a mil (which we did), from my perspective at least, it seems like they could care less about you...

    1. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to have to agree. My company has purchased several of their NAS solutions, and were told at the time that integration of CIFS and NFS data areas would not only possible, but easy. That's TECHNICALLY true; if you don't want to have any ACL data for one operating system. It seems that you can have NFS or CIFS security information; modifying the permissions from one client type wipes out the permissions for the other. "This is a feature of DART!" they say. "Would you like to upgrade to Symmetrix for hundreds of thousands of dollars MORE than what you've already paid?"

    2. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back around 1977 or so, the company I worked for bought some EMC expansion memory for our PDP-11/70 and bought a service contract for it. The company paid annually for that service contract for ten years. The memory failed, they called EMC, and nobody at EMC knew what kind of memory we were talking about. They didn't have anyone who could service it, they had no spares, they had no replacement... but they were willing to take our money every year for that "service contract.'

    3. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your experiences with EMC may make you think that they treat large companies well. I work for a large company (Enough over 25k employees as to be huge) that has several EMC disk arrays, a couple of which are attached to servers I administrate.

      To get their lies out of the way first. I communicated some service problems I have had with EMC to someone I know who is in another company which was considering partnering with EMC. EMC upon hearing of my service woes, promised to these people's face to contact me "before you leave this week". That was actually the second time they had promised to contact me to deal with my service problems. Well, they never even attempted to contact me.

      EMC sells a product called "SRDF" which is used to synchronize two Symmetrix EMC frames (or parts thereof) usually over TCP, and keep them synchronized. On more than one occassion we needed to copy a large amount (about 1TB or so) of data from one frame to another over a wide area network. EMC suggested using SRDF. When I asked about the security of the transfer I was informed by a semi-technical (professional services sales) person that SRDF was "completely secure because only another EMC frame could understand our proprietary format." It took me about two minutes to describe two methods by which the data could be caught and understood, a few minutes later I thought of a third way.

      In service, my problems with EMC are too numerous to go into here. One of the worst service problems (which was also combined with a bit of a lie) was when we were doing a major change to the EMC frame. We reviewed the change heavily with EMC to try to make sure everything was covered. EMC specifically told us that Veritas Volume Manager would respond well, and that it was fully supported. The change caused a large (> 2 day) outage on the server which was traced back to the change being made online despite EMC's promise that it could be done online. During the aftermath discussion, EMC proclaimed "we do not support Veritas". Even the senior managers who were listening in realized how much EMC was being fast and loose with the facts. (Some of it instead of ouright lying, was leaving out details to make other people look bad and imply that had certain things been done the outage would not have occured, when in fact, they didn't make a bit of difference.)

    4. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh... The EMC bus comes rolling at you and you find yourself being thrown under it by your friendly neighborhood EMCer. I guess that's the true meaning of "The EMC Effect".

      I made the mistake of steering a small company fow which I worked towards the FC4700 from them: It's a cross between JBOD and a Symmetrix, but it was fairly cheap (about a quarter of a mil or so when it was installed). Ran really fast, and worked pretty well. For a while. After I left (to, co-incidentally work for EMC in a couple different functions), the box developed a number of problems: The "Call Home" functionality stopped working even though we were promised that it would always be monitoring itself; The basic configuration of the box wasn't as flexible as we were led to beleive -- they left out some vital information about how LUNs had to be assigned; and, most recently, the box blew a drive and caused a large amount of corruption because, even though EMC approved all the install details, the box apparently gets quite confused if there is more than one hot-spare. And, of course, the box failed to call home, yet again. From what I understand, they wound up having to restore from tape.

      Great box. Or something.

    5. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      it seems like they could care less about you
      Why does the American version of this saying use "could", doesn't "couldn't" make a lot more sense?
    6. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's a sort of idiomatic contraction from the original phrase, which was something along the lines of "they could care less about me if I was a dead bug on their windsheild, but otherwise I'm the lowest of their concerns" or something like that.

    7. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      It's a common mispronuncation brought on by 6 year old girls on the playground. I find it as funny as people calling me "retarted."

    8. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by spiedrazer · · Score: 1
      We just purchased a SAN, and EMC was one of the vendors we were looking at. They had the most heavy handed sales tactics of anyone I have dealt with (12 years in IT). There favorite line was "We don't mean to trash the competition, but..."

      Specific lies are hard to recall, since we quickly determined that the sales team was definitely heavy on the 'sales' and light on the tech knowledge. They kept wanting to take my boss to lunch, figuring that she would be less technical and easier to convert to the EMC religion.

      --
      Keep passing the open windows...
    9. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by weave · · Score: 1
      We had Data General Clariion drives here since about 1993 and were very happy with the drives and DG service. EMC bought DG around two years ago and have raped the company. They were mainly interested in removing a cheaper SAN competitor in my opinion. They've kept the Clariion, but latest I've heard, are enlisting Dell to sell and service the things and told us we are being pawned off on them. So much for the premier EMC service I bought into at the time...

      At the time, it seemed like the right thing to do. I kinda now wish I went with Compaq Storageworks, but they were non-committal about Linux support at the time where EMC promised full support (read my parent article about how THAT turned out).

    10. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      It used to be used as part of a sarcastic, offhand remark, with emphasis on the "could": "I could care less about you." It lost its sarcasm through overuse. Funny how we stop thinking about meaning when we get used to phrases.

      If it makes you feel any better, the Grammar Fascist always says "couldn't care less."

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    11. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by Zurk · · Score: 1

      LOL. after reading about the symmetrix data loss at the gun auction website i wouldve thought people would take a hard look before buying EMC.
      HDS is the only reliable vendor out there with a refund policy if data is lost. i think the HDS9660 comes with it. 1/3 of the purchase price back every time any hardware causes a data loss.

    12. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1
      A number of other replies echo similar and worse problems with EMC.

      I tried an Ask Slashdot article on ideas for open source implementations of disk mirroring over WAN. I was roundly flamed for failing to find EMC on google. I had no idea that EMC was as bad as it is, but I did know that it was way way way too expensive for our customers. I am looking for disaster recovery that is better than offsite tapes, and affordable for small companies with < 100 employees (All of which enter large volumes of transaction data daily.)

      We did get an email from MiraLink which is still way too expensive, but they promised to review their pricing.

    13. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by weave · · Score: 2
      I just looked at your ask slashdot. I also got the pitch for EMC's mirroring product for Symmetrix. Very expensive, yes.

      I guess it all depends on what you are protecting. You should be able to replicate database transactions to a backup server as they happen so that is covered. For normal file system files, I use rsync. Works well but isn't immediate. Still, it's an easier off-site backup strategy than carting tapes back and forth, as long as you have the WAN bandwidth, and it's a tad bit cheaper than doing mirrored SANs.

    14. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by weave · · Score: 2
      Well, I know no one reads /. stories when they are 24 hours old, but I thought I'd add some followup comments to my rant above.

      First, my memory is a bit off, the sg version mentioned that EMC used was 3.0.10, not 3.0.16 as stated above. The fact about it being a development version and that EMC should never have used it was stated by the modules author, Douglas Gilbert, in a private e-mail to me (I did ask him later if I could disclose this publically and he said yes.)

      A portion of his message I dug up...

      Ken,
      Ouch, the sg version 3 interface was under development then.

      From my archives:
      -rw-r--r-- 1 dougg dougg 25035 Jan 25 2000 sg3010.tgz
      -rw-r--r-- 1 dougg dougg 25603 Mar 11 2000 sg3012.tgz

      This driver was targeted at lk 2.4 which was released in January this year. The lk 2.2 port was to allow people to test it on production OSes.

      The defining property of version 3 of the sg driver is an additional interface. It is used by the SG_IO ioctl() [0x2285]. I changed the interface between those 2 versions. If memory serves, someone complained. It was on the sg website so people could test it (not hardcode it into a proprietary solution). DG/EMC have never contacted me about this.

    15. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1
      The setup has to handle sudden interruption of the WAN link at any stage of the transfer (e.g. primary site gets bombed). rsync is OK for email directories and such, but not for the entire system.

      There needs to be some sort of journalling - which you get for free when mirroring updates to an ext3 filesystem at the block level (and copy blocks in order of update). There is a semi-free (open source + proprietary extensions to make it useful) linux block driver from a company in Austria which sounds more promising.

    16. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 1
      Well, I know no one reads /. stories when they are 24 hours old, but I thought I'd add some followup comments to my rant above.

      Yes we do! Especially on a Monday night when it's dead at work and boring as hell.

      You won't catch me buying from EMC, now that I've read all the horror!

  104. Automatic Butt-holer... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    My dad ran across an advertisement for a sewing machine in the newspaper once. It had a special feature: "an automatic buttholer".

    My dad never did by the machine, but I have a feeling they were lying when they said it had a feature to automatically butthole something.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Automatic Butt-holer... by seanadams.com · · Score: 2

      It had a special feature: "an automatic buttholer".

      You missed the fine print: there's a "per anum" service fee to get that feature.

    2. Re:Automatic Butt-holer... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "You missed the fine print: there's a "per anum" service fee to get that feature."

      LOL!!! 'So fast, you can sew by the seat of your pants!' (Sorry, that's the best I could come up with. Drink a couple of beers and then read it.)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  105. CNET News - Interesting quirk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just poked through your Microsoft Lies webpage and found something rather interesting. This seems to work in mozilla, and probably in IE as well if my instinct is right..

    There are several links on your page to cnet news regarding some of the wrong doings microsoft has committed, ie. this one and this one.

    I think what you'll find interesting is, although not being very old (1999 articles), cnet has decided to "Expire" them... BUT the contents of the story seems to show up here in mozilla for less than a second, then mozilla redirects me to the expired page.

    Now here is a much much much older article from 1996 that is microsoft-friendly in its nature..
    But this one isn't expired :)

    someone else try this because everytime i click those damn anti-microsoft articles, they get 'expired' ... hard to use that as a verb but thats what is happening.

    1. Re:CNET News - Interesting quirk by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Just hit the stop before after the first one loads, I had no problem getting to the articles when I did this. (it did forward to the 'expired' page though, btw). If you want to see the content, I'll be glad to grab it and post it here somewhere.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:CNET News - Interesting quirk by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2

      This is quite unfortunate. CNet was one of the few news websites that I really liked to use for reference links because they had a track record of keeping their URLs for stories the same for years. It looks like this is changing now. I hope to replace the links from KMFMS to dead articles with summaries whenever I can find a cached copy to summarize, so those who are interested in the original articles should read them now while they can still be accessed.

  106. Browser not supported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over at msn they are saying this:

    "Browser Not Supported"

    "If you are seeing this page, we have detected that the browser that you are using will not render zone.msn.com correctly. To play on the Zone you need a computer running Windows95 or greater and we recommend either Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or greater or Netscape 6.0 or greater.The Zone is best viewed with Internet Explorer. To get the latest version, please select the free download link below."

    Wow I can get a free download of Windows to run on my mac.

  107. lies by Prowl · · Score: 1

    You're job is safe.

    --
    That man tried to kill mah Daddy
    1. Re:lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you can't spell "your" correctly...

  108. Story made only for karma-whoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here, mod me up:

    "Windows {95,98,NT,2000,XP} is reliable"

    I suspect most people replying to this thread, still being 14 year old script kiddies masturbating in their parent's basement don't even know what "vendor" actually means. But it's cool to post stuff like that to slashdot and pretend to be a real cool guy. I bet they can't wait until they're 18 and get a "Network Admin" job without a degree.

    Biggest ACTUAL LIE told to me by a vendor: that I had to spend an extra $900 for a protocol license for a Xylogics terminal server, and when it shows up a protocol license is included free in the box from Xylogics.

    Okay, now you can mod me down:

    "Linux, ready for the desktop"
    "Linux 2.4 will be out by the end of the year"

  109. How could we forget... by Lukey+Boy · · Score: 1

    The leaders entire cigarette industry proudly declaring that nicotine is not addictive, and that they do NOT actively advertise towards kids - after being sworn in at a court of law.

  110. 384k upload! by Fortuna+Wolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The place I live sells accounts to rooms, single port in a room, you call in, 30 dollars to sign up, and 20 for a month, sounds good, right?
    So I call them up, ask them, what's the service, the plan, the billing, etc...
    don't worry, its 2.2 mbps down, and 384kbps upload!
    Ok, sounds good... sign me up.
    well, aside from a quick little problem with the router attaching itself to your mac address,
    it turns out that its sharing one road runner account through the whole apartment complex.
    I call up tech support "can you tell me why my internet connection sucks so badly?"
    re: "because its a sucky connection on sucky routers" (that's what tech support said, at least THEY were being honest).
    well, can you fix it?
    Sure, let us kick some other people off the network...
    eeee!
    Right now, I download at about 20-30k, and my upload is around the ballpark of .4k
    I can't play CS, because my choke is at 100 and my ping is 2000.
    Give me a 36.6k modem! Pleaasseeee...

    --
    Disclaimer:The "Human" attached to this account is unresponsible for anything unless it wants responsibility.
  111. Titanic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'This ship is unsinkable!'

  112. Compression Algorithm by Prowl · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    That man tried to kill mah Daddy
  113. they all lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When we were looking for 3270-oriented database software years ago, vendor I (who has since been bought by mega-vendor C) told us that they could do relational-type databases and that their screen and application generator could do our applications for us.

    We gave them a sample application and it couldn't be done, in fact they told us after some questioning that we'd have to write code. But they had the gall to try to intimidate us when we chose someone else over them.

    More recently, another vendor (mumble) proposed 3270 to web integration software. They had good references, but some of those references hedged on some of our questions. In the bid response they said they had several clients that used the same database we use (the one we chose above) and they could not produce a single reference when asked for the names (by comparison, we recognized the clients that other vendors gave us).

    Then, the vendor we chose (believe it or not, the one I just described - wasn't my personal choice) agreed as part of the contract to delivering a working application for part of the trial/roll-out. My understanding (I wasn't present when this was said) was that we were told we paid for so many hours on the application, but that they didn't sign blanket contracts for deliverable applications without hours attached. We are still in "acceptance period" so I can't say more.

    They all lie. Ask questions. Ask lots of questions. Challenge everything. Assume that references may have been "bought", particularly if they are in the same city.

    (Posted anonymously because I might be recognized)

  114. Found the original press release by goodie · · Score: 1

    The example press release with the company names changed:
    http://www.cio.com/archive/010102/hype_sidebar_1.h tml

    The real press release:
    http://www.trueadvantage.com/press_04.htm

  115. All we will need by The+Donald · · Score: 1

    640K is all the memory everyone will ever need.

    --
    You know who I think is crazy? All my ex-girlfriends!
  116. Thats business with .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 degree of separation.

    -Version Number of that OS?

    ^Let me check.
    Why it looks like it is Version 1.0000002a.

    -Thank You Goodbye. Call me when service 2 pack has come out.

  117. The Hurd out this year by pinkpineapple · · Score: 2

    PPA, the girl next door.

    --
    -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
    1. Re:The Hurd out this year by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Good one.

      But it should be GNU/Hurd. :-)

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  118. Spam these days.... by GraZZ · · Score: 1

    ... Enlarge your penis in 3 - 5 days with safe drugs!

    or my favourite:

    Buy diplomas from prestigous, non-accredited universities!

    1. Re:Spam these days.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second one isn't a lie. You can select your alma mater from any of the Iwy League schools.

      Top 5 (by purchase):
      Harbard
      Yail
      Princetan
      Stenford
      Da rtmoth

  119. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  120. Hacker's arent allowed to use our service... by marvonmars · · Score: 5, Funny

    While improving the code on a client's website, I became suspicious of the credit card validation code. The setup was that a user would get sent offsite to the credit card validation service. They would enter their credit card details and the validation service would process the card, bill the user, and then send an activation code to my client's website. Recieving the activation code was confirmation that the credit card was legit and the user was a paying customer.
    The problem was that the authorization code was always the same. In fact, according to the validation service's spec, the code was always '0000'. And all the codes were sent via the web pages the user accessed as HTML hidden variables. One could (and I did) build dummy HTML pages that simply sent the authorization code to the website, bypassing the validation service, and recieving all the goodies reserved for paying customers.
    So I went to see the validation service people to explain to them their non-existant securtity model. And they acknowledged the problem and said they would have it fixed promptly. And if you believe that, boy have I got a bridge you'ld love to have!
    First they claimed that since the code was a 'hidden variable' no one could see it.
    After I built the dummy page in front of them (in friggin notepad), they claimed that I didnt get all the authentication codes in and they were sending 'secret, invisible' authorization codes that didn't appear on the web pages. Nevermind the fact if I, as the website programmer, couldn't access those 'secret, invisible' authorization codes I couldn't well check for them to autheticate users could I?
    Then, they claimed that only people like me could do it, and that I was a Hacker (captial H, please). And, don't you know, Hackers arent allowed to access the validation service.
    It was really bad. I ended up yelling at their chief programmer and calling him a liar to his face before they finally stopped stonewalling.

    1. Re: Hacker's arent allowed to use our service... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > While improving the code on a client's website, I became suspicious of the credit card validation code. ... The problem was that the authorization code was always the same. In fact, according to the validation service's spec, the code was always '0000'. One could (and I did) build dummy HTML pages that simply sent the authorization code to the website, bypassing the validation service, and recieving all the goodies reserved for paying customers.

      Hey -- you forgot to give us a link to the site!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: Hacker's arent allowed to use our service... by cpeterso · · Score: 2

      you forgot to give us a link to the site!

      www.hotmail.com

  121. Re:Good point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When a customer comes into a shop and sees "2.2GHz!!!!" and then sees a cookie, which do you think they will go for?

  122. Eppox by chrislike · · Score: 0

    No Really, our boards are 100% AGP 2.0 compliant.

  123. EMC lies by pde · · Score: 1

    Know how to tell when an EMC sales rep is lying?

    His lips are moving.

    1. Re:EMC lies by ZenJabba1 · · Score: 1

      Damn, needed your advice about 12 months ago!

      --
      `find / -name "*your_base*" -exec chown us:us {} \;`
  124. 4 hours battery life on my Compaq Presario by pinkpineapple · · Score: 2

    ... maybe in sleep mode ;-)

    PPA, the girl next door.

    --
    -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
    1. Re:4 hours battery life on my Compaq Presario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 hours for toshibas, but maybe only 30mins in low power mode (where the screen is so dim you might as well not use it).

  125. Bestbuy When I purchased my GBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the first day they were selling them. The cashier told me, with many witnesses(co-workers and other patrons) that I should purchase their extended warantee because "the game boy advance was first generation" and "they were not really sure what problems they had yet" and that "if it broke I would just be out of luck"

    I can't imagine how many people that worked on.

  126. Re: Guns by elmegil · · Score: 2

    Exactly. No people, no toast.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  127. Re:Good point.... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

    I'd say Intel is equally guilty of marketing BS. Their P4-1.5Ghz can barely keep up with a PIII-1.0Ghz. That's the only reason AMD went with the stupid PR rating. In fact, reviews like this one have shown that AMD has been very conservative with the PR ratings, and the Athlon XP regularly spanks the equivalently rated P4 in speed tests.

  128. Now that. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    ...now that is 1 degree of seperation.

    Fake.

  129. I'M NAKED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn i love gir, im going to build a real gir robot.. gir rules

    TACOS!

    1. Re:I'M NAKED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      POT ROAST!

  130. nice article by spir0 · · Score: 1

    they go on about everyone takes payouts, never believe what you read - except from themselves of course - and then go on to recommend one company on the entire planet you should go to and talk to them for a couple of paragraphs.

    how ironically amusing. did anyone else fall for it? it's a glorified ad.

    --
    The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
  131. The guilty party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I remember the press release mentioned in the story's sidebar. A company called Edify released it when they announced their support for Seibel 7.

    Of course, everyone who adopts Seibel's software does this.

    Wow, I gotta get me some of that!

  132. Sun Microsystems by Draco · · Score: 2, Informative


    With the release of the UltraSprac 3 we've solved all of our "ecache bit-flipping cause your machine to crash at random times" issues.

  133. Simple, Yet Powerful vs. My Mom's Advice by EvanKai · · Score: 1
    "Simple, Yet Powerful" has always been a red flag for me when dealing w/ vendors. When evaluating a product, I try to follow my Mom's advise about women...


    "If it's easy, it isn't good."


    If someone described a blind date as simple, yet powerful, would you go?

    1. Re:Simple, Yet Powerful vs. My Mom's Advice by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1
      --


      Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
  134. Broken Promises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in New Zealand we've had two companies that've broken their marketing promises of flat rate interntet. First there was Chello, who closed their operations. Now we've got Telecom, who're claiming that their flat-rate accounts are being violated by people who *gasp* use their connection all the time.

  135. SURFBEST INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER!! by BSDGeek · · Score: 1, Interesting

    SurfBest claimed **unlimited** dial-up access for $12.50 P/Month. They have 8 networks for people to dial into. However, only like one of them has truly **unlimited** service. The other 7 have limits on them, like 150Hrs, 200Hrs, and 250Hrs was the most I believe.

  136. While comparing complex Enterprise support... by tchdab1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .... utility packages (costing millions!), the salesman of the vastly inferior product promised me that it would be rewritten to completely match the features of the product I preferred (it had nearly none of them), and that most of it would be done by the next release less than 6 months away. I was then flown to the "developent center" and introduced to the (1) developer who had just been hired, who was told to promise me the same thing. When I asked, I was told there were no plans in place, no direction, no schedule yet to make this happen "but you can be our model customer and drive it!".

    It boggles my mind, but many within my own organization believed these people and I had quite the fight to keep from buying this and then being the one whose job it would be to make it work.

    Go figure.

  137. HDD Vendors by teslatug · · Score: 0

    1000MB = 1GB

    1. Re:HDD Vendors by J'raxis · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is. The prefixes youre used to using: kilo, mega, giga, etc., are meant to be in 1000s, not 1024s. The IEEE has invented new, stupid-sounding prefixes to mean 1024-units: kibi, mebi, gibi, and so on.

      1000 MB = 1 GB.
      1024 MiB = 1 GiB.

  138. Those silly retail shareware vendors 10 yrs ago by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Informative
    I think that the vendors who sold shareware games in those little rectangular plastic packages just bigger than the 5.25" disk were a joke. This was in the late 80s and early 90s.

    I'm not actually talking about the companies that made the games (Epic, Apogee mostly) but the actual companies that manufactured and sold the shareware packs on bargain racks in Radio Shack for $4.99 a piece.

    It was baloney because if you looked at the screen caps on the back of the packages, they only showed screenshots from the registered versions of the game, while the disk inside was the shareware version (i.e. the one you get for free from BBSs.) This pissed me off so much, especially when I spent my hard earned allowance dough on what I thought was a real registered copy of Paganitzu but it was the shareware one I already played.

    1. Re:Those silly retail shareware vendors 10 yrs ago by Phexro · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, yes... The shareware rack. I never got suckered into that, I had a blazing fast 14.4k modem, so I just downloaded all the shareware from my local BBSes.

      However, I once saw one of those racks at Future Shop. On the back of every package was the phrase "Hermetically sealed to prevent viruses!"

      Had a good laugh about that one.

    2. Re:Those silly retail shareware vendors 10 yrs ago by Jmstuckman · · Score: 1

      It's even better when the screenshots are of a *different game*! Don't forget about the "Board Games" title with a screenshot of a trek game on the back. It's even better when they forgot to put the picture on -- leaving nothing but a filled green box. (Castle of the Winds)

    3. Re:Those silly retail shareware vendors 10 yrs ago by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 1

      I got one or two as gifts, but it wasn't all bad. A couple of them had games (mostly bad) that weren't on any local BBSs, allowing me to gain download credit by uploading them.

  139. Re:Good point.... by FlorentinePogen · · Score: 1

    Hmm, no, it's not like lying in your customer's face.

    Hypothetically, Intel could take the trusty old 386, remanufacture it in a 13 micron die size using modern fabrication methods, and run it at 5Ghz. (Ok, maybe not, but just suspend disbelief here) Would it perform better than even a 1Ghz P3 or Athlon? Probably not. But it would legitimately be running at 5Ghz. And people would buy it, because 5Ghz seems on sight to be much more impressive than 2.2Ghz.

    Now, a 1.667Ghz Athlon XP provides similar (or greater) performance than a 2Ghz Pentium 4. Yet people will buy the P4, because it has a bigger number. AMD knows that consumers buy based on Mhz rating, so they've started using the PR ratings to even the playing field. It's not lying -- it's simply comparing the Athlon's performance to the P4's performance.

  140. it's all lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.snowbound.com

  141. Re:Good point.... by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

    No, actually it is being sold as being comparable to that MHz class of Pentium IV, it's primary competition. therefore, it helps to inform the innocent customer, not mislead him. However, I suspect you might just be an Intel fan, and that's fine...i'm not.

    However, it might also help to point out that (the rumor is anyway), intel saw the way people were buying processors. MHz = Performance in many people's minds. They thought a bit, and then designed a low-IPC, high MHz processor. In that light...it seems that maybe intel is sticking it to the customer.

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
  142. Our own sales force... by xpccx · · Score: 1

    I worked for a company that made communication equipment that worked over CATV lines. I was a junior engineer at the time but being part of the hardware team kept me fairly knowledgeable with what was being developed.

    Our sales force did a press release (that also showed up in the company newsletter) stating we had successfully modified our existing hardware so that our system could handle double the throughput.

    Now, no one in the hardware group was aware of such a feat and some of the engineers became considerably annoyed since management would probably expect us to make good on what the sales force had already said we had done (which, if I remember correctly would have required us to break the laws of physics).

    Anyway, some of the engineers complained to management and they were told they needed to be better TEAM PLAYERS!

  143. Our Toner... by Zamis · · Score: 1

    Will make a 300 DPI laser print at 600 DPI.

    I laughed so hard I could barely point her to the door.

  144. When I bought my first PC by brandonsr · · Score: 1

    It was an HP pavillion, and the guy said "it will never break".

    1. Re:When I bought my first PC by DimitryP · · Score: 1

      when my parents bought their first computer, it was a macintosh with a 66 MHz processor. the salesman told them "this computer won't be obsolete for at least five years." it had a 14.4 modem, that they wouldnt upgrade, because "it won't be obsolete for (5-x) more years"

      --
      Guns are like umbrellas and condoms. Better to have one and not need it, than need it and not have one.
  145. An SNMP-enabled router, by any chance? by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Funny
    the chances of you hacking into my box are slim to none. [Specially considering I am behind a router].

    You really shouldn't roll out the red carpet like that. (-:0
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  146. You need this digital coax cable by Drakino · · Score: 2

    I have a reciever with both digital coax and optical inputs. When looking over the cables deciding, a Best Buy rep (Monster cable certified as well) talked to me about it. I asked what cable I should get, optical or coax. His response was to go with the coax because optical is unreliable due to vibrations that might occur, distorting the sound. I asked how an expensive Monster Cable optical could possibly get to the point of cutting off the optical signal without someone physicially bending the cable really hard, and how enterprise storage solutions seems to work fine on miles of flimsy optical cable in server rooms with tons of possible minute vibrations from the air movement.

    In the end, I went with a normal RCA cable for the run since it works.

    1. Re:You need this digital coax cable by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      End result, he's right. Someone who doesn't know optical can quite easily break the glass -- especially those used to running copper.

      That said, for some reason I've started (unconciously) running cat5 with rather large loops at the corners. Guess you just get used to it ;)

      --
      Rod Taylor
    2. Re:You need this digital coax cable by netik · · Score: 1

      You can use standard RCA cable for the coax connnection, but it'll introduce jitter. If you must substitute RCA coax cable, use high quality (75 ohm) RCA cables normally used for video.

    3. Re:You need this digital coax cable by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      most stereo optical interconnects use plastic instead of glass.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:You need this digital coax cable by Drakino · · Score: 2

      I know that glass is breakable, and is somewhat fragile. But his point was that it would somehow pick up inteference on it's own just sitting there being hooked up. I confirmed this with another "Monster Cable certified" tech at another Best Buy. So aparently it's common knowledge with these supposed professionals.

    5. Re:You need this digital coax cable by Jay+L · · Score: 2

      Optical plastic fiber (e.g. SPDIF) CAN introduce jitter. Some brands are apparently better than other brands; all things considered, I'd tend to doubt that Monster is a "better brand", but you never know.

      Search rec.audio.pro for recent discussions of that.

  147. CompUSA by Renraku · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Christmas-before-last, I told my parents I wanted a GeForce2 video card and a stick of RAM for Christmas. Well, they went down to CompUSA, and came back with a video card, 256MB RAM (like I had asked for) also they came back with TV-tuner card, an Ethernet cable (25ft) and a monitor switching hub. We took everything back except for the video card and RAM, and demanded a refund for the stuff, because according to my parents, the salesman told them I had to have the other stuff in order to install the video card and RAM. They were this close to getting my parents to buy software to go along with it. Good thing their budget just ran out.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:CompUSA by Junta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hey, that is reminiscent of my Aunt and Uncle going to buy a computer. I'm over there and they bring home everything they bought. They wanted something that could be used for basic word processing and stuff. They come home with a top of the line system, as well as a CD-RW and Uninterruptible power Supply. They said they didn't think they needed this much, but said the salesman first insisted anything but top of the line was a waste of time, even if they just want word processing, and that a UPS and CDRW were absolutely necessary for the computer to function properly...

      Of course, this from the same class of salespeople who said "if you hook a DVD player into a VCR, the VCR will probably fry, so you best avoid going through the VCR, or else you mught void the warranty and have to get a new VCR..." The floor salespeople at most retail outlets are so unbeleivably incompetent..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:CompUSA by Batou · · Score: 1

      The floor salespeople at most retail outlets are so unbeleivably incompetent.


      Isn't that why they're working in retail in the first place?

      --
      "Oh my God! The dead have risen! And they're voting Republican!" - Bart Simpson
    3. Re:CompUSA by sharkey · · Score: 2

      The floor salespeople at most retail outlets are so unbeleivably incompetent.
      Isn't that why they're working in retail in the first place?


      Yep. McDonald's AND the porno theater looking for a jizz-mopper turned 'em down.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:CompUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CompUSA is Satan...

      I bought a used PC from them years ago. Some whitebox P75, I think. When the motherboard farted out, I took it back on warranty.

      When I checked in on it a week later, they'd lost it, telling me that their inventory system had gone down. I had to identify it out of a pile of their to-be-serviced boxes.

      Another week went by. "Not ready yet. Parts on back order..."

      Finally, I just demanded the box back. "But your warranty will no longer be valid, sir..."

      Then went to Fry's, got another MB and did my own work, like anyone else would have done already.

    5. Re:CompUSA by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      Of course, this from the same class of salespeople who said "if you hook a DVD player into a VCR, the VCR will probably fry, so you best avoid going through the VCR, or else you mught void the warranty and have to get a new VCR..."

      No, but hooking your DVD player through a VCR often won't work because of copy-protection. So you won't break your VCR (duh) but with most DVD discs you probably won't get a good picture showing up on your TV.

    6. Re:CompUSA by Tim+Doran · · Score: 2

      Yep. McDonald's AND the porno theater looking for a jizz-mopper turned 'em down.

      Actually, the porno theatre didn't have an opening for a jizz-mopper

      :)

    7. Re:CompUSA by sharkey · · Score: 2

      LOL!!

      Or should I be revolted that you were able to point that article out?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:CompUSA by Daniel · · Score: 2

      The floor salespeople at most retail outlets are so unbeleivably incompetent..

      It sounds to me like they're making sales they wouldn't have had they been truthful and accurate. Is that really incompetence for a salesperson?

      (there's a reason I avoid salespeople at all costs..)

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    9. Re:CompUSA by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      That's only if you're silly enough to use your DVD player with the VCR turned on. Depending on how your VCR was designed, Macrovision artifacts will sometimes show up on the TV. (Good VCRs just record the artifacts to the tape.)

      The obvious solution is to simply power your VCR off, or simply keep TV/VCR off if you're running the VCR. (If you're trying to record the DVD, which usually won't work due to the aforementioned Macrovision. And, of course, if you're taping a different channel, you need to swap the cabling of the VCR and DVD player.)

      A VCR without TV/VCR on should have no effect on the output at all.

      Of course, I've suddenly realized that maybe you're talking about using A/V cables. Good VCRs still shouldn't have a problem with that, though. Macrovision should only screw things up if you're taping it, and even then it should only screw things up on the tape.

      Regardless, if you can help it, you should go VCR - DVD - TV and not DVD - VCR - TV, anyway, as then you can tape things while you're playing DVDs. Of course, the best solution is to just use a TV with two AV inputs and hook the VCR and DVD into those. ;)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    10. Re:CompUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      DVD through VCR still can screw up even if you're not taping, regardless.

      I don't know if it was Macrovision, but my Panasonic DVD player, going through my Panasonic VCR, would flick on and off repeatedly. I don't know if it was Macrovision, or what, but a $50 "Digital Video Stabalizer" between the DVD and VCR fixed that problem, and was cheaper than a new TV.

    11. Re:CompUSA by QuackQuack · · Score: 1

      It won't fry but the &*@#$@ Macrovision will
      prevent you from watching anything through your VCR.

      I was extremely irate that I had to shell
      out an extra $30 for a box just to watch DVDs because my older TV (at the time) only had the cable inputs, and of course DVD players use video/audio output plugs. Which my TV doesn't have, but my VCR does. Worse the RF modulator box made everything look washed out.

      It was at this point that I realized that the anti-DMCA crowd were more than just file-swapping pirates. I mean DVD vendors are assuming that I
      was a pirate even though all I wanted to do was watch DVDs with my existing hardware.

      --
      By reading this sig, you agree to the terms of my sig license.
    12. Re:CompUSA by Junta · · Score: 2

      Really, in my experience I only see problems if I try to tape off the DVD. My understanding is that MacroVision consists in spikes in the signal that occur outside of our ability to see. When a recording VCR sees the signal spike, it decreases the recording level to compensate for the apparently strong signal, reducing the useful information signal strength to an insignificant amount. I was under the impression that VCRs only did this when trying to write the signal to tape, but I guess some may do it all the time to inputs. In any case there are special devices (even at bestbuy) that claim to be signal enhancers that simply filter out macrovision spikes, it may be the ticket to get things to work better.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    13. Re:CompUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. When I started this job my only computer was a Toshiba 430CDS Pentium 133 laptop (dual-scan, blechh.) The system wouldn't boot for some reason and CompUSA was an authorized Toshiba repair center. I was stupid enough to think they were a good place to take the computer because they were a big chain and whatever.

      After a month of calling to see if it was fixed they finally said it was ready. My boss happened to be in the area so he stopped in to pick it up and luckily he tried to boot it before leaving the store. It was in the same exact condition as when I brought it there - it did not turn on.

      About two weeks later they were finished with it and it really worked that time. I laugh whenever I see the huge letters in their front window "WE FIX COMPUTERS!"

    14. Re:CompUSA by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Digital Video Stablizer==Macrovision remover, so, yes, that was the problem. ;)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  148. Salesmen? by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 3, Funny
    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  149. Power strips Win95 compatible by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

    When assembling a bunch of laptops for a remote sales force, I got a shipment of equipment in, including about 50 surge protectors.

    They were all marked 'Windows 95 compatible'. This was mid 1996. DAMN I wish I'd kept one!

    1. Re:Power strips Win95 compatible by No-op · · Score: 2

      Wow, I remember those power strips. they were hilarious, you'd read the box and wonder who in hell thought that made sense to put on it.

      --
      EOM
    2. Re:Power strips Win95 compatible by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Back when the Internet was New and Exciting, I remember seeing an "Internet compatible" mousepad ad reprinted in Abort Retry Fail.

      Reminds me of my Y2K compliant monitor. (It does have a clock of sorts in it.)

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    3. Re:Power strips Win95 compatible by tps12 · · Score: 1

      When I worked at a computer store the surge protectors claimed that they were Y2K compliant...

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    4. Re:Power strips Win95 compatible by unitron · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you aren't old enough to remember all the speakers and headphones marketed as "Digital Ready" when audio CD's first came out. It involved the advanced technology of slapping a sticker on the package.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  150. The $cientologists already have harassed Slashdot by Flarners · · Score: 1, Informative

    And, just like Google, Slashdot caved in like the little sissies they are.

    --
    "The problem with the French is that they don't have a word for 'entrepeneur'." -George W. Bush
  151. I know! by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

    "News for nerds. Stuff that Matters".
    ::dons asbestos suit::

  152. Non Sequitur Lie by poena.dare · · Score: 1

    In late 1995 I worked for a web shop that was desperate for clients. In an attempt to beef up sales, we hired a friend of the CEO to act as a salesman and marketing drone. This poor guy didn't know squat about the web, let alone computers. Believe me, we really tired hard to teach him, but the only information that he ever would retain were buzzwords.

    Fast forward a month later. We are pitching a large consumer products firm about the Wonders of the Web; trying to give them an idea of what the web can do for them. In the middle of the presentation our sales guy blurts out, "It's totally CASE SENSITIVE!"

    You could have heard a pin drop as we stared very hard at our pet freak.

  153. Re:My Vote: Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is a solution to that and they've done it. simply remove the code that does that. for example, have you ever seen a win98 BSOD in win2000? nope. there's an NT crash screen, but I'd bet the win98 BSOD screen doesn't even exist in their code!

  154. MS vs Korn by xueexueg · · Score: 4, Informative
    I think this is what he's talking about. Pretty funny:

    http://wigner.cped.ornl.gov/the-gang/1999-01/139 6. html


    I've been attending the USENIX NT and LISA NT (Large Installation
    Systems Administration for NT) conference in downtown Seattle this week.
    One of those magical Microsoft moments(tm) happened yesterday and I
    thought that I'd share. Non-geeks may not find this funny at all, but
    those in geekdom (particularly UNIX geekdom) will appreciate it.

    Greg Sullivan, a Microsoft product manager (henceforth MPM), was
    holding forth on a forthcoming product that will provide Unix style
    scripting and shell services on NT for compatibility and to leverage
    UNIX expertise that moves to the NT platform. The product suite
    includes the MKS (Mortise Kern Systems) windowing Korn shell, a
    windowing PERL, and lots of goodies like awk, sed and grep. It actually
    fills a nice niche for which other products (like the MKS suite)
    have either been too highly priced or not well enough integrated.

    An older man, probably mid-50s, stands up in the back of the room
    and asserts that Microsoft could have done better with their choice of
    Korn shell. He asks if they had considered others that are more
    compatible with existing UNIX versions of KSH.

    The MPM said that the MKS shell was pretty compatible and should be
    able to run all UNIX scripts.

    The questioner again asserted that the MKS shell was not very
    compatible and
    didn't do a lot of things right that are defined in the KSH
    language spec.
    The MPM asserted again that the shell was pretty compatible and
    should
    work quite well.

    This assertion and counter assertion went back and forth for a bit,
    when another fellow member of the audience announced to the MPM that the
    questioner was, in fact David Korn of AT&T (now Lucent) Bell Labs.
    (David Korn is the author of the Korn shell).

    Uproarious laughter burst forth from the audience, and it was one
    of the only times that I have seen a (by then pink cheeked) MPM lost for
    words or momentarily lacking the usual unflappable confidence. So,
    what's a body to do when Microsoft reality collides with everyone elses?

  155. Bungie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else remember some Bungie executive, perhaps the ceo, promissing that Halo would be released on the Macintosh, first, or at least simultaneously with the xbox?

    I hate Microsoft.

    1. Re:Bungie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when they said ONI was going to be a good game.

  156. Re:Q: Most Outrageous Vendor Lie Ever Told? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company was considering replacing our internal development repository control system (currently a combination of software from various vendors with an internally developed VB GUI) with all-in-one solutions.

    I was on the review committee that saw presentations from various vendors.

    I saw Sourceforge's presentation. 'Nuff said.

  157. Oh, but it *is* true by imac.usr · · Score: 2
    Apple advertises that its machines have "Pentium-crushing" performance (emphasis added). That's absolutely true.

    Granted, Pentiums haven't been commonplace in most consumer PCs for some time now, but there's still nothing at all wrong with their claims.

    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
  158. CD burning for Audiophiles by kuhneng · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember a great article on burning CDs in an audiophile magazine.

    After the expected disclaimers about the limited quality of CDs, etc, they proceeded to review the options for media, burners, configuration options, etc. Then, as expected, came the result of their listening tests. Although the differences were subtle, the best quality was obtained by using the most expensive drive, with the most expensive gold media, set on 1x recording speed.

    The kicker came near the end, where the author noted that "even though all of the CDs we burned were bit-for-bit identical when compared on our computer, the bits on CDs produced with less expensive recorders or at higher recording speeds had dirtier edges, and repeated copying further degraded the quality of the bits".

    1. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why I bought a bit cleaner. Later I found out I can also use it to rewind my CDs.

    2. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      Actually, the article is correct, and their point is valid. "Dirty" bits actually refer to the edges of the pits burned into the disc having edges that aren't crisp. This increases the likelihood of bit flips, lessening the quality of the resulting audio output when the DSP in the CD player can't handle indistinct edges of the pits. This becomes a very real problem when a burned CD is stored in a hot environment, such as a car dashboard. Try it yourself.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    3. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by netik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a problem with your complaint here --

      When you copy a CD you -are- changing the data. I know what you're about to say as a rebuttal - "CDs are Digital, therefore copying a CD means that I'm doing a digital copy, right?" Wrong.

      If you rip a CD, copy the file to disk, and then burn ten copies of that digital File, then all of those CDs are identical.

      Now, if you read in the CD, write it out, read in the new CD, write it out, and so on, you're changing the data, if the CD contains any small errors.

      Due to interpolation (minor error), concealment (larger error), and muting (massive error), the data coming from the CD reader changes.

      References:
      Audio Compact Disc http://www.ee.washington.edu/conselec/CE/kuhn/cdau dio2/95x7.htm

    4. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Nah - I don't buy this - if "small errors" crept into data burnt onto CDs on a regular basis, half the software I downloaded and burnt would be corrupt. It never is. My burner is ancient. Therefore I don't think it likely that anyone else's writes with a detectable error rate. I take your point - that errors could creep in if a burner didn't form the marks well enough, and the more you copy a thing, the more chance of this happening - but I have yet to see it, and I burn quite a lot of stuff (all those Q3 mods n maps are quicker to download at work, and transport on CD :)

      These guys make me laugh - the only thing thats gonna affect the output of one CD player over another is the DAC, PSU and other bits on the analog side. My Sony CD player even has "One bit sampling" on it LOL. That'll be a 1 or a 0 then....

      Seen on a DVD the other day too: "PAL" like the data is different if your player renders PAL as opposed to NTSC or Secam. Hell I could shove it in my PC and it won't be any of those - but it'll still display - in a resizable window too if I want.

      Getting back on topic - a sales guy in a Sony shop once told me that I couldn't use my current component amp. with the CD player I was thinking of buying as it didn't have a "CD" input. "Well of course not" says I "CDs weren't invented when this amp. was made - how would it be any different than any other line in? from say - a tape deck or tuner?" (needle scratcher inputs are different btw). He couldn't answer this but maintained I couldn't and got shirty when I pressed him for a reason. hehe eventually, I just shook my head slowly and left...

      These days I have that very expensive CD player connected to an old set of Yamaha YST sat+bass PC speaker combo and it sounds pretty good!

    5. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Joke's on you ;)

      Their explanation of the effect is dubious, but what they were experiencing was variations in jitter and BLER (correctable and uncorrectable errors, and timing variations on pit spacing).

      Some CD players are sensitive to jitter, and some are not: it is quite measurable and produces characteristic artifacts. As for BLER- did you think Red Book CD audio had LOSSLESS error correction? At all levels? ;)

      If you want perfect bit-for-bit identical audio archiving, burn a DATA CD, not a Red Book...

    6. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by herbierobinson · · Score: 1

      Actually, the way CDs are produced can affect the playback quality in cheap players: The lower frequency components of the jitter in the digital data feeds through the power supply rails into the analog electronics. It doesn't happen with players that have good grounding an power supply regulation (but there pretty much aren't any). It also doesn't happen if you use the digital outputs of the drive. Of course the D/A converter can still be sensitive to bit pattern jitter in the digital stream....

      --
      An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
    7. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by muleboy · · Score: 1

      I think they're talking about the CD-audio standard, which doesn't have the same kind of error correction as ISO9660. You lose a few bits here and there when ripping a CD-audio, but if you have a clean CD, a Plextor CD drive, and cdparanoia, you won't lose much (if any) quality. After that, just keep it in ISO9660 and you'll never lose a bit.

    8. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      Play a PAL DVD on an NTSC TV and you will see a difference. PAL has more scan lines. It won't look right, that's a fact. Its a very important thing to consider when buying DVDs from other countries.

    9. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by ghjm · · Score: 2
      Exactly.

      Think of the Billy Crystal character from The Princess Bride: "It's only mostly digital. There's a big difference between mostly digital, and all digital."

      However, the notion that the bits themselves are somehow "dirty" is still hogwash.

      -Graham

    10. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by acq3 · · Score: 1

      This has got to be one of the dumber things I have read recently...

      No matter how 'bad' the first write is, as long as it can be read correctly, the second write starts perfectly and then is affected only be the variables in the second write (burner, media, etc)

      The first read does not retain the 'bad' aspects of the first write such as rough pits through to the second write.

      That would be analog....

    11. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 2

      Until a few months ago, audio CDs featured error correction codes which permitted to reconstruct the original data stream even in the case of a few errors. The error correction information is not as verbose as on data CDs, but it is there, and if a CDs is not mutilated, it suffices to reconstruct the correct data.

      However, some recording companies have started to deliberately place wrong error correction codes on the discs, to make copying harder.

    12. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by CTachyon · · Score: 1
      Nah - I don't buy this - if "small errors" crept into data burnt onto CDs on a regular basis, half the software I downloaded and burnt would be corrupt. It never is. My burner is ancient. Therefore I don't think it likely that anyone else's writes with a detectable error rate. I take your point - that errors could creep in if a burner didn't form the marks well enough, and the more you copy a thing, the more chance of this happening - but I have yet to see it, and I burn quite a lot of stuff (all those Q3 mods n maps are quicker to download at work, and transport on CD :)

      As others have pointed out, there is a difference between audio and data CDs. A Red Book CD-DA disc has sectors of 2352 bytes (1/75th of a second of audio), after the basic ECC is processed. A Yellow Book CD-ROM uses a second layer of ECC that turns those 2352-byte sectors into 2048-byte sectors, adding enough redundancy to deal with the fact that arbitrary data can't just be interpolated like audio can.

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
    13. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by nathanh · · Score: 3, Informative
      Nah - I don't buy this - if "small errors" crept into data burnt onto CDs on a regular basis, half the software I downloaded and burnt would be corrupt.

      Data CDs and Audio CDs have different encodings. Data CDs use 304 ECC bits per 2048 data bits. Audio CDs use 24 ECC bits per 2352 data bits. Audio CDs can degrade if you record/rip/record/rip multiple times. Data CDs can potentially degrade too, but the higher number of ECC bits makes it much rarer.

      My Sony CD player even has "One bit sampling" on it LOL.

      1 bit DACs are clever inventions that avoid the problems with traditional voltage ladders. They are nothing to laugh about.

      Seen on a DVD the other day too: "PAL" like the data is different if your player renders PAL as opposed to NTSC or Secam.

      The coding on a PAL DVD is different to the encoding on an NTSC DVD. This is why R4 vs R1 sites tend to recommend R4 because the higher resolution on PAL DVDs gives you a better picture on decent TVs.

    14. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by olman · · Score: 1

      And then there's the Exact Audio Copy, which actually uses the error correction code from your CD to make sure you really honestly do get digitally perfect copies. If the CD is clean, there's no problem, if it has scratches and dirt, you might have to play with the settings a bit.

      So, CD ripping isn't quite the same thing as just recording the stream from a CD-player digital output and hoping it's a-okay.

    15. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      People seem to forget that a digital signal still has to be carried over, and stored on, analog media. Those pits that store your 'digital' audio have distinct edges and variations in depth. The laser diodes that record and read the data also has a 'shape' to the digital signal it produces. The power output of the laser determines how fast the pit is 'burned' into the disk, which coupled with the rotational speed of the moter produces a varying pit shape. The frequency and linewidth of the light from the laser diode varies from player to player, and from recorder to recorder. The detector that reads off the reflected data from the disk also has its own response curve, probably nonlinear, as well as its own transient response.

      The main benefit of digitally encoded information is that there is a wide range of input variables for which the output signal will be exactly the same. There are many factors that will affect the encoding and decoding of a digital signal, especially when it has to be processed through something like a CD - an optical medium.

      So let's think: Sound pressure -> microphone transducer -> A/D converter -> optical transducer -> CD storage medium -> optical transducer -> D/A converter -> amplification -> speaker (still a transducer) -> Sound Pressure...

      That's a lot of energy transformation. We can fairly safely believe that any changes to the digital signal will occur at the point of the transducers. Now all you have to do is believe that the optics and laser circuitry are the first place that the cost engineers are going to start trimming from when the plans leave the design engineers' desks, and you'll be well on your way to understanding why getting a true digital copy from CDs is so difficult.

      If that doesn't convince you, ask yourself why they wasted so much space on error correction data in the format to start with. I think it's safe to assume that the very presence of those error correction codes tells us that the people that designed the standard were some VERY smart cookies, and they know a helluva lot about digital optical systems, and just how fragile they can be. I for one am amazed of how much we've actually been able to accomplish with light, and I spent a large portion of my life studying electro-optics.

      Of course, the irony of the whole development is that 99% of audio piracy going on today I can barely accept as being 'music' in the first place...

      Then again, I just heard that Johannes Brahms is now asking Napster to filter all of his works from their servers, as it's costing him millions in loss of... oh, never mind...

      ~Loren

    16. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by mindriot · · Score: 2

      True, but frankly, I don't think an audiophile person would ever be as stupid as to make copies from copies from copies... if you're so overly concerned with the quality of the CD pits that you would spend 1000s of bucks on gold media and burners, you should probably know about the copying process and make your copies properly.

    17. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by XaXXon · · Score: 1

      When you digitally rip a CD, you *ARE* making an exact copy. This is exactly the same process as if you were to copy software from a CD. You aren't going to tell me that the binary on the CD and the binary on my hard drive are different are you? If they were, CD's wouldn't work for software.

      What you're talking about is analog playback. This allows for interpolation, concealment, and muting. Digital does not.

      When I digitally rip a CD, it is an *exact* copy of what's on the CD. If a section of the disc cannot be read properly, you get skips and such in the resulting sound file, but no loss in quality elsewhere.

      The link you *should* have posted was
      http://www.ee.washington.edu/conselec/CE/kuhn/cdro m/95x8.htm. This is the behaviour of a digital rip.

    18. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by CMan0 · · Score: 1

      Let's suppose you do the same with a text file. You(by experience) won't have any problem with it. So, if you don't make an mp3 out of the cd, but copy it bit by bit, it will not lose any data, of course if you try to make it mp3->cda->mp3->cda, it will be much worse...

    19. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 3, Informative

      I love all these comments "correcting" the commenter. Anyhow.

      Audiop CDs are written with less error correction than data. It's just how life is. The reason for that is you won't notice a few bits that are off with a music CD, but binary code that's wrong can render a whole disc worthless.

      Think of it this way: ECC is basically a way of encoding data, not unlike compression. With the bits used for audio, you can make up for huge errors but little problems are just glossed over. Data CDs avoid that problem by spending an order of magnitude more bits to guarantee a perfect match.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    20. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by The+Madpostal+Worker · · Score: 2

      Not really, you could t hink of dirtier as meaning a higher error rate (true at faster burning speeds), more jitter (mainly a function of the player), or physical defects(from imperfections on the media).

      The big point is that they _aren't_ completely identical copies, however so slightly bits do get changed in the copying process. However, you can avoid some of the changes by doings things like using better media, burning at slower bit rates, and using better quality equipment.

      Its the same issue that audiophiles always have. For 99% of the people 99% precent of the time 99% of the equipment out there is suffcient. But should you decide to be picky about it there are differences.

      --

      /*
      *Not a Sermon, Just a Thought
      */
    21. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every CD has errors. Writing with a CD burner (not sure about the process the record company use) will result in a CD that is not identical to any other CD. CDs have a very robust error correcting scheme however there is no way that a copy can be quite as good as the original and recording speed does seem to make a difference.

  159. Re:Good point.... by darkonc · · Score: 2
    One of the best examples of clock speed vs cpu speed was back in the 8 bit days, with two entirely different memory access schemes.. A z80 took 4 clock cycles to access a byte of memory, while a 6809 or a 6502 would take 1.

    This meant that a 4MZ Z80 was about the same as a 1MZ 6502 (actually, it'd often be slower because the 6502 was pretty much a RISC chip without the registers). Nonetheless I'd run into people who were absolutely sure that a (1Mz) Apple was much slower than a souped up (4mz) TRS-80.... rong.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  160. Not a real incident ... by Utopia · · Score: 1

    ...but related.

    car dealer: "OK folks, here we have the brand new car. It's top speed is 300
    km/h, it has 12 airbags, it automatically avoids traffic jams, it needs only
    2 liter per 100 km. No competitor has something similiar. Isn't that
    something?"

    customer: "does it come with a tow-bar?"

    car dealer: "not from the manufacturer. But it's all standard, you can buy
    one somewhere else or build it yourself."

    customer: "well, if it doesn't come with a tow-bar it doesn't make things
    simpler. I'm probably going to stay with my tractor."

  161. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    about 4 months ago, I finally got Windows 2k installed on my work computer. Previously, I had been running Windows 95, which had memory leaks with the software I had to use, so stopping/restarting all programs and rebooting was necessary at least every other day, and I usually powered down nightly.

    With Windows 2k, I have had no downtime whatsoever (I had to reboot a couple times the first day because the install person screwed my password, butsince then, it's been running 24-7).

  162. Digital - Analog by CanadaDave · · Score: 1
    Just my two cents...

    Some guy tried to tell me I had to convert all the equipment in my house to digital. His reason was that signals could not be converted back from digital into analog. He said that "once they've been converted to 1's and 0's, then that's it! they can't be converted back into analog. So if you don't get all new digital equipment now, you're analog stuff will be obsolete soon!"

    So I asked him how those 0's and 1's ended up producing audio signals, video signals that we could see and hear. He didn't really have any answer for that, the guy was clueless. I can't even remembe what I went in there for, but this guy was trying to sell me the store, and I never went back.

  163. Any service vender... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you call up your cable/satellite/phone/DSL vender and the first thing you hear is "All services running at full capicity" when you know damn well (through traceroute) that it's one of their servers killing your bandwith...

  164. @T&T Interactive Advantage by Goose3254 · · Score: 0

    The convienent web interface will speed trouble reporting and resolution...Uh...Hello? The truth is they can do absolutely nothing constructive...close the ticket and have no interaction with the customer whatsoever until he or she tries to CALL in to the call center and gets the 45 minute callback announcement. The truth is, salespeople are just doing a job. If the purchasers would consult with engineers and describe what they are promising the internal customer, then the engineer could make an informed recommendation. Instead, salepeople take the purchaser out to lunches, the purchaser buys the line of crap they're shoveing, and then the end-user suffers..but of course we know it's always the desktop/server/network....

  165. College Network Sevices by secondsun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, we do know what we are doing.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
  166. NAI Distributed Sniffer Client/server together by fanatic · · Score: 2

    This dickhead salesman sat in a meeting with us, including my boss, and told us we could run this product (DSS PRO for WinNT) with the 'agent' (which captures the packets) and the 'snifview' program (which lets you see the packets and run the agent) on the same machine.

    The first goddamn time anything went wrong, the techies told us this wan't a supported configuration.

    I sent the saleshit the URL for Ethereal, which I'm going to evaluate as replacement for all (or all but one) of our over-priced sniffers. He had to have one of his techies explain it to him.

    But the real question is: how incompetent are your programmers when you can't run server and client on the same machine, but can do so on different machines? Isn't usually the other way around?

    --
    "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
    1. Re:NAI Distributed Sniffer Client/server together by fanatic · · Score: 2

      Ooops - screwed up the URL, that should be http://www.ethereal.com/ . DOH!

      --
      "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
  167. You're the only one with this problem.. Your fault by darkonc · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've mentioned this a couple of times.

    A friend of mine was supporting a group of a few hundred Wintendos boxes, and he ran into a problem where Excel was corrupting files on a semi-regular basis. When he took this to his assigned MS support rep, he was repeatedly told (over a number of months) "It must be something that you're doing wrong because I haven't been able to find anybody else with the same problem.

    One day he was talking to this rep when my friend mentioned that he was talking to person X at company Y.

    "Oh, yeah, he's one of my asignees,' interrupted the rep. "I talk to him all the time."

    "Oh," replied my friend rather acusingly, "then you know about the problem that they've been having".
    (They had been having the same problem for monthes and had been fed the same line by their [this same] MS rep.).

    [guilty silence]

    Busted!

    And for this 'service' we paid thousands of dollars a year on top of the license fees.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  168. OneBox.com by rbeattie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use Onebox.com as my voicemail box. I used to pay a yearly fee to get my own phone number (despite what it says below about a "free trial"), then they decided to cut the "premium" service altogether, but I got to keep the number. Here's a copy of the Onebox Plus page that's been up for the past year:

    We have concluded our free trial of our Onebox Plus premium service and, due to the acquisition of Onebox.com, we have decided not to offer a paid premium service plan to users of our service. As a thank you for participating in our trial you may keep your Onebox Plus service for free. We have deleted your payment information from our system completely and you will never be charged for the Onebox Plus service.

    If you have any concerns or questions, please contact us using the support form in our Help Center.

    Thank you for your participation,

    The Onebox.com Team


    And HERE is the email I just received from OneBox:


    IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ONEBOX USERS

    March 14, 2002

    Dear Onebox customer,

    Through the years, providing you with a reliable, high quality service has been our primary mission. In order to continue, Onebox will begin charging a nominal fee. If you would like to maintain your Onebox account, we require you choose a messaging package that best fits your needs no later than April 15, 2002. Unfortunately, if we do not receive your selection by this date we will discontinue your account.

    If you have an account with Onebox, you will need to register for a paid subscription prior to this date. To subscribe, please click on the following link http://www.onebox.com/service/indexFounder.html . While registering, please update your profile information where necessary. To make the transition easier, your Onebox user name and password will remain the same and all your messages will stay in your account. However, you are required to change your phone number to a new, toll-free number.


    Hmmmmm... What part of never didn't they understand? Bastards. I'd willingly pay them money to continue using my voicemail number, but they're not even giving me that option. Despite numerous emails asking about this, they haven't even responded. Bastards.

    -Russ

    --
    Me
    1. Re:OneBox.com by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I'm still using onebox but have never been charged. Then again, I'm cheap and never buy premium services (not even /.).

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    2. Re:OneBox.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're still using it because it isn't April 15th 2002 yet.

  169. "Get Your MCSE in 15 Days! Guaranteed!" by glShemp · · Score: 1

    I'll be telling it in about 14 hours when I get to work tomorrow.

    The misleading part is that the website only makes a vague reference to "pre-camp study". What that means is that you get to plow through 7 800 page books and you need to be hitting at least 50% to 60% on the Transcenders before you come to the camp or you don't have much chance of passing the exams.

    1. Re:"Get Your MCSE in 15 Days! Guaranteed!" by puto · · Score: 1

      Hey you aint lying! Did we got to the same camp this month in Orlando FL? Fess up! I was there for 21 days. MCSA and A. I am now a broke MCP who is going to have to EBAY all my study materials to pay the light BILL.

      Felder Smelder

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  170. "You need our application server." by consumer · · Score: 1
    I can't even count the number of times some vendor has tried to tell me I need their application server in order to build a "scalable" web site. A company called Kiva (eventually purchased by Netscape) convinced my manager we needed their Java application server. This was before the days of Java servlets being widely adopted, when Java was unbelievably slow and certainly not up to the task of running a busy site. Nevertheless, we plowed ahead and built our site.

    One of the lies I remember specifically was when I asked the salesman if their product cached database query results. He confirmed it absolutely. Of course it didn't, which we found out during our training. It also didn't have date formatting in its templating system despite what the documentation said, so we had to build that.

    Finally we got the thing into production and it crashed like mad. We never did find out why. Probably something to do with the NSAPI module that handled connections from the Netscape web server to the application server. Even when it wasn't crashing, performance was horrible.

    That round of managers eventually left and the whole thing was re-done in mod_perl. Guess what? Stable, fast, easy to work with. Oh yeah, scalable too.

  171. HP 32-bit thing by Jethro · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish I was home to post this a few hours ago - probably nobody will see this now.

    One time I was at a conference sponsered by HP, Netscape, SCO and Oracle. It was called "UNIX in the Year 2000" (this was in 1998 or something). This took place in Israel. Netscape, SCO and Oracle sent some top-dog public-speakers from their European divisions, all of which gave great talks (even Oracle!)

    HP had some guy from the Israeli vendors.

    He was asked when HP is going to support 64-bit computing.

    His answer: "64-bit is SLOWER than 32-bit! With 64-bit there's DOUBLE the memory to go through, so it takes the program TWICE AS LONG to do anything!!!"

    Yes, caps and exclemation marks and all - the guy was YELLING at the person who asked the question. And he said this in front of HUNDREDS of highly experienced UNIX guys.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:HP 32-bit thing by s390 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      His answer: "64-bit is SLOWER than 32-bit! With 64-bit there's DOUBLE the memory to go through, so it takes the program TWICE AS LONG to do anything!!!"

      Well, he was partly sorta right. If your programmers misuse 64-bit data operands where 32-bit data would do just as well, the application is going to waste about half the memory cache space (at all levels), so it _will_ run much slower. 64-bit flat memory is useful, especially for large databases, but programmers still have to understand what they're doing (and what the compiler will do, how that will impact the processor, memory, etc.) or they can build programs that run slower than they did in 32-bits.

      See the 64-bit computing faq that's up at AnandTech right now.

    2. Re:HP 32-bit thing by KidSock · · Score: 2

      His answer: "64-bit is SLOWER than 32-bit!

      Actually this is true. It is slower. Of course this stuff depends greatly on the programs running but consider a) if the cache lines of the CPU are filled with 64bit values where 32bit values would have sufficed it does use more space and therefore will result in more cache misses and b) most software is written for 32bit processors so undoubtedly there will be compatibitly code executing and therefore slowing things down. It's not "twice as" slow but it's not necessarily faster. Having said that it is possible to write a program that runs just as fast as it's 32bit couterpart and in some cases faster (again, depending on what type of calculations are being performed) if the compiler was very good with 64 bit instructions and knew about the capabilities of the particular CPU.

    3. Re:HP 32-bit thing by Jethro · · Score: 2

      Well, I guess I was somewhat paraphrasing, but it all needs to be taken in context. (A) Is this REALLY the reason HP hasn't switched to 64-bit? and (B) The guy was YELLING at us, for goodness sake. It's just a vendor doing a really bad job trying to mislead people.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    4. Re:HP 32-bit thing by herbierobinson · · Score: 1

      Guess what. I've heard that most of HP's customers still run the 32 bit operating system on the 64 bit computers because the 32 bit OS is faster.

      Performance is very dependent on cache footprint size. In some applications I have worked on (lots of small processes), it was very dependent on stack frame size: When you go to 64 bits, the minimum stack frame size doubles. So does the size of all the registers saves (i.e., context switches). This is all stuff that one can't control from the application.

      --
      An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
    5. Re:HP 32-bit thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its the same under solaris...

    6. Re:HP 32-bit thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but 64 bit is not double the memory of 32 bit. 33 bit is double the memory.

      So if the vendor didnt have his head up his ass, he would have at least known to bs with "2^64 memory is a lot slower to go throught than 2^32 memory." Not double.

    7. Re:HP 32-bit thing by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Gee, the 4004 must be _really_ fast then. (4-bit micro...)

  172. Well.... by Pxtl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One in particular that I ran into back when I was a kid - I was picking up a newer model soundblaster from a local computer store. I asked them if it could do general Midi, particularly emluating an MP-401 or a Roland system? They said yes, straight to my face. I mentioned that this was important to me, that it didn't just use the useless non-wavetable midi system of the old SB-16's and 8-bits.

    This was, of course, bullshit. I tried to return it, but they would only give me store credit, and I didn't want anything else from them (mainly they had printers and full systems, very little in the way of parts).

    I also had massive difficulty with the driver disk they gave me, so I mailed the company, and was informed that the card they gave me was an OEM edition specifically designed for use in certain systems, never intended to be sold separately.

    At the time I didn't know this was standard procedure for the computer industry (I don't by anything but OEM, and most of it isn't meant for use outside pre-built boxes) so I ratted the store out for selling me that card.

    Really, I feel kinda sleazy about it - the store was gone within a month, I wonder if it was my fault? Still, they did it to themselves, trying to rip off a middle schooler.

    Whatever, that's the closest thing I know to the subject.

    1. Re:Well.... by edhall · · Score: 2

      Actually, they were right, more or less, and you were wrong. Creative themselves claimed that the SoundBlaster was Roland MPU-401 compatible. You see, the MPU-401 isn't a synth, as you seem to have thought. It's a MIDI interface -- a device for transmitting and receiving MIDI signals from a synth -- nothing more.

      "General MIDI" is a standard (or rather a series of standards) mapping a predefined list of synthesized instruments onto MIDI, and standardizing how they are selected and mapped to MIDI channels. It has noting whatever to do with Roland MPU-401 compatibility.

      I said they were "more or less" right since in fact the SoundBlaster was only comparable to an MPU-401 running in "dumb UART" mode, and even then it had a lot of glitches (lost interrupts and so forth) and required a special cable (that was usually not part of the package). A real MPU-401 had a "smart" mode where it actually queued and timed MIDI events for you, freeing the computer from performing these tasks. It had 3 DIN-5 MIDI connectors (in/out/thru) right on the interface box (which was separate from the card). I still own one (though I haven't used it in years).

      Of course, an honest saleman would have seen your confusion between "General MIDI" and "Roland MPU-401" and informed you of the difference, rather than exploiting it to make a sale. Or perhaps the salesman only knew the phrase "Roland MPU-401 compatible" and was too ignorant to know that your desire for "General MIDI" was an unrelated requirement. In any case, a little knowledge, as the platitude says, is a dangeous thing.

      -Ed
    2. Re:Well.... by Spreetin · · Score: 1

      I ran into something kinda simmilar when I bought one of my first soundcards for my 386, in that time. I wanted a fully SB-compatible card, but the real things was a bit to expensive for me (I was just 12 or something) so I asked him two questions:
      1, Is it fully SB-compatible and will work in all MS-DOS applications and games that use SB?
      2, Will it work under both windows 3.1 and windows 95?
      The answer to both of these questions was ofcourse yes. I was a bit doubtful but he asured me that he was telling the truth so I bought it. I got home and tried it. I found out the following: It wasn't SB-compatible at all, it was SB PRO 2.0 COMPATIBLE!!! I could only run it under a few games that used SB PRO 2.0 and as said on only a few of the ones that could support the real thing. Most would not run at all. Second, it didn't work very well under either win3.1 or win95, but after a few months I got new drivers for (I didn't have a internet connection back then) it so I could get it to work under win95, but it was a pain in the ass.

      After that I learned two things: Never ever trust a sales person. And second never ever buy a "fully compatible clone" of whatever.

      --
      8 * 7 = 42
  173. Re:The $cientologists already have harassed Slashd by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
    And, just like Google, Slashdot caved in [slashdot.org] like the little sissies they are.

    When it comes to protecting something important to us we're almost all sissies. Some of the smartest decision in life involve a concession or retreat of some sort. Life isn't like the movies, where in the end the hero gets rewarded for standing up for principle. Instead, you tend to wind up broken and regretful. Life is a long, long game, and it's tough to get to the other end without falling into the traps along the way. An easy way to fall prey to those traps is to make decisions based on pride and ego.

  174. DVD Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 things:

    1) Bought a DVD player as a gift from Best Buy. The checkout girl asks if I want the service plan. I say no. She says, "Well the technology in these things is changing all the time. It won't be able to play the DVDs that come out 6 months from now." That's why she's the checkout girl.

    2) My friend who knows nothing about computers just wanted something to do email and word processing. She is also poor, so I took her to Best Buy to buy one of those cheapy e-machines. Like everything else, they don't have any. I remark that they shouldn't advertise stuff they don't have in stock. The sales guy bitchily replies, "You should have called first." That pissed me off, so back and forth until finally he says "You wanna take it outside?" Where do they get these people?

  175. You'll never run out of disk space by Dastard · · Score: 1

    300M - $350 1.2G - $180 4.0G - $160 40G - $140

  176. Iomega technical support by curunir · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of the (many) times that I had occasion to contact Iomega's technical support department due to a non-functioning drive, it went something like this:

    Me: My drive makes strange noises when I put in a disk.
    Iomega Rep: Is your Zip drive within 6 feet of your monitor?
    Me: Why yes, it is?
    Iomega Rep: Well, that could be the problem.
    Me: Interesting...well, the cord that came with the drive is only 2 feet long. Should I try stretching it?

    Needless to say, I eventually had to send it back. The one good thing I can say about Zip drives...the one year warranty never expires! You get a new one every 6-9 months when the old one dies.

    --
    "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    1. Re:Iomega technical support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for UCanal er Softwank er ClientLogic (Client Logic Information Technology = C.L.I.T, try explaining to you manager why the name CLIT is part of your screensaver!). Anyhow, when you call Iomega tech support you're call us. The cow-orkers were instructed to authorize the shipment of a new drive whenever the customer complained for 4 minutes or longer. Less than 5 minutes, no drive for you! Iomega actually asked us to increase the time to 6 minutes but our callcentre managers said that it would result in increased turnover so it stayed at 5 minutes.

      We tech guys at CLIT would pour over the returns each day, grab the drives that worked OK, and sell them on Ebay.. . :-)

    2. Re:Iomega technical support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet I have two drives that work fine, and have worked fine, for the more than 3 years I've owned them. On the other hand, I'm unable of assembling a new computer that runs. I always end up with some part that has stability problems. I've switched all parts (including the case), and yet I still have problems. While my older systems, and the other computers here, and at the neighbours' place work fine. Hardware is voodoo magic. That's why I deal with software, if I can.

    3. Re:Iomega technical support by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      Iomega is the worst. When they drop a product, they DROP a PRODUCT. I bought a Buz multimedia box back in 1997 and was very impressed -- excepti with the fact that it wouldn't work with my k6-2. Their answer? "Buy a pentium class system." So I did, you know. The card performed like a DC-30+ for half the cost and i needed a new machine anyway. I bought a dual p2. The card worked -- but not in NT, which is the OS i was using (so the second chip wouldn't just heat the room). The answer? "We'll have drivers with NT 5.0"

      They dropped the product in 1999 for poor driver support -- before win2k came out -- and suspended work on their drivers. Come to find that their drivers had just matured, and the beta "1.3" drivers for win9x were just awesome. There were NT 4.0 drivers, too -- that nobody had except reviewers under three levels of NDA.

      Now, this card is my only SCSI driver. It is useless in 2k, Me, XP...and I've undertaken the task of converting the linux drivers, which work amazingly well, into 2k drivers. It's a pet project that is absolutelyu meaningless because the DC-30+ can be found for a few hundred right now. But I am so pissed at Iomega's disrespect for their customer base that I long to see the now cheap "Buz SCSI card" installed in media labs across the country. It would serve them right for killing a great product with dumb management.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Iomega technical support by Rocko+Bonaparte · · Score: 1

      There might be some merit to that. I have a K2000 keyboard (sampler, for all that nitty-gritty industrial-techno), and a SCSI zip drive for it. I've read that the zip drive should not be placed above the keyboard's regular floppy drive. From what I understand, zip drives aren't magnetically shielded too well. Over time, the thing will start rattling and banging when one tries to access a zip disk. It will correct itself if moved away and operated for awhile. Similar to how an old monitor can (kind of) degauss itself if you let it run for awhile.

      For more information, look at http://members.aol.com/zipcod1/Zip.html

      --
      No I'm not trolling.
  177. Most Outrageous Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I programmed this to happen to demonstrate the flexibilty of the program."

    Former boss, while demonstrating our software, when a software-generated object started doing whatever it wanted [marching from left to right and back as if it were a target in a shooting gallery], in plain sight

  178. Re:Good point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, please.

    Ignoring the fact that AMD has no real choice in the matter since they would likely lose sales badly to higher-MHz Intel chips, I don't see how it's "lying to your customer" to accurately represent the performance of your chip when naming it. Hell, while I'm not a big believer in benchmarks, many of them show that the numbers AMD puts on the Athlons are actually rather conservative. There are 3DMark benchmarks out there that have the XP1600 ahead of a P4-2000, SysMark with the XP1500 ahead of the P4-2000, compiling a Linux kernel also with the XP1500 ahead of the P4-2000, blah blah blah.

    I wouldn't expect such performance on a consistant basis in the real world, but the Athlon CPUs do perform quite well. To the best of my knowledge, all Athlon mobos display CPU speed on startup as well. It's not as if AMD is trying to shove the speed under the rug entirely; they're just naming their processors to accurately reflect their actual performance so they can remain competitive. It's most certainly not anywhere close to being the most outrageous vendor lie ever told.

  179. The Win95 rollout by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this belongs, despite the fact that Bill Gates was actually speaking the truth when he said, a few days before the roll-out of Windows 95, that people needing tech support from Microsoft would never be kept on hold for longer than an hour.

    Yup, it was the literal truth. Anyone who called Microsoft waited on hold, and then, after 59 minutes, they were cut off.

  180. My wife's former boss by lovelace · · Score: 2, Funny
    My wife used to develop e-commerce sites and one day during a code audit the customer asked if the credit card numbers in the database were encrypted. My wife's boss pipes up something like:
    "Yes, they're encrypted with the Murpheson Schmidt 128 bit encryption scheme."
    (For those who don't know crypto, this doesn't exist.)

    In a later episode, at a company party, there was a "raffle" for a Palm III (it was several years ago). The sign said "Enter your business card for a chance to win a Palm III". My wife thought it a little fishy that the company's biggest customer won and her suspicions were confirmed when she later heard her boss (the same one) bragging how he had rigged the contest so the customer would win.
    1. Re:My wife's former boss by rtaylor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure it does. Murpheson Schmidt is very similar to a double rot13.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    2. Re:My wife's former boss by halo8 · · Score: 1

      At our Company Xmas Dinner out of 20 prizes 5 went to managers... and when you consider the manger to employee ratio is 1-20 thats very dubious.. i would REALLY like to see a thread or a poll on this.

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    3. Re:My wife's former boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know a vendor that laid on a raffle at a trade show to win a PDA. After the show, the MD went through the business cards submitted and, after deciding that none of them were sufficiently likely or rich prospects, took the PDA back to the shop for a refund.

  181. 640 kb ought to be enough for everybody by dunkelfalke · · Score: 0, Troll

    said bill gates anno 1981

    well then, everytime you thing you have at last enough mem/hard drive space for everything you will discover a programme which needs more.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    1. Re:640 kb ought to be enough for everybody by Plutor · · Score: 1

      Stop spreading LIES.

  182. Glad I kept the packaging by screwballicus · · Score: 2

    "A wide range of programs exist for the Texas Instruments Home Computer"
    - found on the box to my TI99/4A

  183. Depends on context. by eddy · · Score: 1

    Was he talking about DOS'ing competitors off the net? :-)

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Depends on context. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be DoS, not DOS, you daft cunt.

  184. More cable modem woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So as friends around me were getting cable modems, I was envious. Then I got the flier saying "Cable modem access is now available in your area!" Lying bastards, they said otherwise when I called in and gave them my address. For six months, I continued to call back, only to be told I couldn't get anything.

    Then a breakthrough happened - instead of calling in, I could enter my address in a new web form and check it myself. Still no luck, however. After another couple months, I got a sinking feeling in my stomach. I entered in my neighbor's address - bingo! It's available. I entered every address on my street, and every one could order cable model access right away. Me? Nope.

    I called them up again, and when I was told again it wasn't available, I yelled "WAIT!!!" I explained the circumstances, and the girl looked in to the situation. Here's the kicker - I was told "Your house isn't on that street."

    Turns out that the previous owner of the house never had cable, so the specific house address was never in their database, even after I ordered digital cable. So they sent a guy out, check the line (got one of the best signals he'd ever seen, btw) and a few weeks after that I was finally up and running.

    Sheesh.

  185. The ones I hated most ... by muck1969 · · Score: 1

    Reinstall Windows 95 and keep an eye out for the pitches made during the installation

    --
    m.mmm..myyy ... sssissxxxtthh bbboottle offf mmmmmoouunnnttain ddeeewww.. in thhe pppassst ffffif
  186. Re:Good point.... by be-fan · · Score: 2

    Yea, a 1GHz G4 is just as fast 1.4 GHz Athlon. Great. Too bad that 1.7 GHz Athlons are dirt cheap in comparison to any Apple machine!

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  187. We have a winner! by The+Flymaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    "At the game developers conference, Sun is releasing a white paper on their new "Java Games Profile." Their ultimate goal? To have one CD you could pop into an Xbox, a PS2, a Windows machine, or a Linux machine, and play the same game on them all. If they get full support for it I can finally get rid of that windows gaming partition!"

  188. Re:Kikes 'n' coons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a terrible person.

    God will punish you.

    God is an Anonymous Coward

  189. ISS by kireK · · Score: 1

    We had way too many false positives with their Scanner and Realsecure, even had an ISS guy onsite for a few days. Still, too many problems. With vendor support that... well... is a pain in the *@&%#$ to deal with we switched to Snort and Nessus . Much easier to manage and the false positives went to almost nothing. I'm not even going to start on the Managed firewall crap!

  190. I wonder why they would do that... by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    Might it be because of watching people crap on Motorola for years, because their processors don't run at the same clock speed as Intel chips?


    No matter how hard you try, people have the "Megahertz myth" burned into their brains.

  191. Uh, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who purchases a high end Disk Solution only to run it on lunix boxes?

    What the hell has this world come to. If you are running on an OS full of moving targets don't blame your storage solution which is meant to not be touched for years.

    EMC still sucks, though.

    1. Re:Uh, by weave · · Score: 1
      Who purchases a high end Disk Solution only to run it on lunix boxes?

      Who said only on Linux? The reason for the SAN is to plug a bunch of different boxen with different OSes into it. I have several NT 4 and w2k server boxes attached as well...

  192. Re:Good point.... by darkonc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The processors are being sold as things that they are NOT.

    Intel is (for better or worse) the benchmark for CPU speeds these days. Athlon is not selling the 2200 as a 2200mz processor, they're selling it as the equivalent to a 2200Mz P4. In terms of informing a customer of how (relatively) fast their CPU will run quake, this is accurate.

    Anybody who knows enough to build and install a wall-mount CPU clock meter that actually measures the clock speed is likely to know that the AMD really is equivalent to the 2.2Gz Intel. For the rest of us, the AMD rating is both more informative for the average customer, and less un-flattering to AMD.

    For an equivalent to this argument: Imagine if people bragged about what RPM their wheels span at rather then the speed that their car drove at. If you wanted to really brag, you'd get a 1/4" wheel and run it at 2200RPM (a whopping 1.6 miles/hour). One could argue that this is not unlike what Intel has been doing with the P4 vs the P3/athlon.

    Think about it -- they're trying to sell a 1GZ P4 an an entry leve system about a year after the P3/800 was out -- but the year-old P3 (which would have normally been the entry level system by now) would have been faster than the P4 if intel hadn't 'de-emphasized' the P3.

    This is why people came out with the dhrystone, whetstone and other benchmarks back in the '80s -- to get comparisons of the relative cpu power across various CPU architectures for which one-for-one CPU clock speeds were entirely inappropriate (e.g. a 4Mz Z80 was about the same speed as a 1Mz 6502 -- mostly becasuse the Z80 took 4 clock cycles to grab a byte of memory while a 6502 only took one).

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  193. How about this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ok, I heard this from a guy at work, but it was hilarious.. and, sadly, I could really see it happening with our management.

    He was in a meeting where the guy running the show was talking about the financial prospects for the coming year.

    Ok, contract "A" is worth $100mil, but we only stand a 10% chance of winning it.

    Contract "B" is worth $20mil, and we stand a 40% chance of winning it.

    Contract "C" is only worth $10mil, but we stand an 80% chance of winning that one...

    so, 10% of $100mil, plus 40% of $20mil, plus 80% of $10mil, means that we should make about $26mil in the coming year.

    As all the other management was knodding their heads in agreement, the guy who told the story popped up and questioned what happened if we didn't win the 1st two contracts... or any of them for that matter. He was given a glare and ignored.

    1. Re:How about this one? by pne · · Score: 2

      This is how things probably happen in many companies... our boss has recently started giving overviews of the company's financial situation and those presentations usually contain a page on contracts in the pipeline, with percentages attached. He says you shouldn't try to understand the maths because it doesn't make sense at face value, but apparently in the long run that sort of valuation makes sense to someone.

      --
      Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
    2. Re:How about this one? by Dick+Click · · Score: 1

      Instead of "means that we should make about $26mil in the coming year", perhaps the boss said "Our expected revenues next year are $26M", in which case, he would have been correct, but only if, the probabilities were accurate (which they almost never are). This is not a lie. The lie would have been "we have contracts A, B, and C coming down the pipe, we expect our revenue to be $130M". Most companies will lie like this.

  194. Re:My Vote: Windows by jnana · · Score: 1
    Today i installed a critical update hotfix. After restarting, whenever I shut down or restart, I get the BSOD during the shutdown process, everytime.

    I had to uninstall the hotfixes, which really sucks, because you have to uninstall each one individually and then reboot--there's no way to do them all at once. So it takes me 6 reboots to uninstall this POS. That's win2k for you.

  195. Goddamn expensive cables by fliptout · · Score: 1

    Everything went down hill when Belkin/Monster started dominating the retail cable market. Jesus christ it's hard to find cheap cables. Not as if spending $60 on cables would make a damn difference over $5 cables.. I remember going to Compusa to look for a CD-audio pass though cable and seeing the $18 price tag. WTF is that?

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    1. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      try the following:

      www.mpja.com
      www.allelectronics.com
      www.alltro nics.com
      www.meci.com
      www.sciplus.com
      www.fairr adio.com

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

      Good cables are *absolutley* necessary in things like, studios :) To a consumer, as long as the impedance is close to what it should be, and theres no shorts a cable is a cable.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    3. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Hell, go to Lowe's, if you have one near. They sell the "Acoustic Response" brand, which works pretty doggone good for me. Good prices on cable, connectors, and wall mounts.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by s390 · · Score: 2

      Expensive home-theater cables are really essential if you're going to get that full theater experience with faithful studio quality sound reproduction from 0-50Khz.

      Besides, all those oxygen-free single-crystal silver mithric-clad super-insulated home-theater cables are keeping my former college ladyfriend happily in 12-cylinder BMW 750s.

    5. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

      Tell me what qualities affect a cables fidelity? (seriously, Id like to know :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    6. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by PzyCrow · · Score: 1

      As I understand it: the cable should have no resistance and no capacitance so that the amplifier has total control of where and when to stop the membranes movement.

      This is a cheap DIY project.

      I've done some math on the "equal length" thing of cables. For each kilometer in different length you'll have to move the speaker with the longer cable 1 cm towards your listening position...

      ---

    7. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by laserjet · · Score: 2

      sweet sig. I like it.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    8. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      Its Accoustic Research, not Response. Good stuff. Lowe's sells the Pro Series, and I think their prices are better than Best Buy's who sells the cheaper AR stuff.

    9. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >faithful studio quality sound reproduction from 0-50Khz.

      DC would be interesting to put through a home theater enthusiasts speakers. Snap crackle, pop! Fried Speakers! :)

    10. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      Basically, all a cable does is carry a signal from one point to another. All wire introduces resistive and capacitive effects on an electrical signal due to the physics of how electrons bounce around in there. A cable's use is specified by:
      1) Impedence/Resistance.
      2) Power rating.
      3) Electro-magnetic shielding.
      4) Resiliance to abuse.
      5) Quality of connectors.

      There are relations between these specifications. A cable with more shielding will tend to take more abuse before breaking. A cable with a lower resistance will usually have a larger cross-sectional area, and will also have a higher power rating. In coaxial cable, the application of the cable normally determines its impedence, and the amount of shielding you need will change the overall design of the cable.

      Speaker cables have an almost unnnoticeable impedence unless you're making runs of thousands of feet. They have no shielding because normal outside electrical interference will never produce a large enough current to move a speaker magnet. Run any tests you want: I promise you that a run of 10 or 12-gauge extension cord electrical cable from your local hardware store will perform just as well on ANY amp/speaker setup as equivalent Monster cable will. The 'skin effect' is laughably negligable at the voltages we're dealing with, especially in the 20Hz-20kHz frequency range. (Don't believe me? I've done the math... You do it, and we'll compare results).

      Unfortunately, aside from power loss through length or impedence mismatch, the quality of a cable is almost always dominated by the quality of the connector. In pro audio, you pay for the amount of abuse the cable will take, and for the quality of the connectors. Almost all signal loss in an audio chain takes place at the point of connection between a cable and a device. Be wary of salespeople trying to sell you on the 'gold plated' connectors. Gold is a very inert metal, and is resistant to corrosive effects, but you will not 'hear' a better signal unless the device you're plugging it in to has gold connectors as well.

      If you're dealing with analog video, your eyes are much more sensitive to interference due to inadequate shielding than your ears are. Video cables tend to be much beefier than their audio counterparts in order to minimize RF interference. Just about all the interference that most people will 'hear' in an audio system is hum and buzz due to noise caused by AC power. And even then, this is usually caused by ground loops and poorly grounded equipment rather than interference.

      So don't believe the hype. But also don't believe that there's not a lot of very complicated electrical engineering going on in cable design. Rest assured, the engineering was not intended for your stereo. Monster Cable uses a genius marketing scheme to exploit the paranoia of consumers that they're buying 'inferior' equipment.

      I will give them this - they make some damn strong cables and connectors. But honestly, how often have you stepped on a cable going from the back of your CD player to your amplifier?

      Just another audio engineer who's always willing to burst the bubble of a potential 'Audiophool',

      ~Loren

    11. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Soulslayer · · Score: 1

      Just another audio engineer who's always willing to burst the bubble of a potential 'Audiophool'

      There seems to be a great deal of animosity held by a fair number of electrical engineers towards the Audiophile world in general. It has gotten to the point where merely mentioning an interest in audiophile grade equipment can get you engaged in full scale flame wars. This gets tiresome fast.

      Audiophiles are no more fools than electrical engineers are. Yes many manufacturers make patently absurd claims regarding how a particular component will improve the audio quality of your system, but that does not mean that there is nothing to be gained from some of the more expensive products (even cables) on the market. The grandiose claims of the marketing for many of these products may be something to deride, but in many cases it is worth the added cost to get a better constructed piece of interconnect. Comments such as "But honestly, how often have you stepped on a cable going from the back of your CD player to your amplifier?" is like saying "seatbelts are great in an accident, but honestly how many times are you going to run into something with your car?". Most $2.00-$10.00 interconnect is built like crap. Yes Monster cable is way over priced (and not really wonderfully built when compared to other similarly priced cables like Audioquest) but the markup in the audio industry has been horrible since day one (typically a minimum of 60% margin on speakers and cabling). And even if you are buying cheap cables you are still being taken for the same ride. It's one of the reasons the audio industry is still fairly healthy while other portions of the electronics industry suffer.

      Yes there are a fair number of wealthy people with no clue getting suckered by audio salesmen. However that no more invalidates the market than the number of poor misguided fools getting swindled by computer salesmen negates the high-end Gamer Rig.

      From my experience much of the snippy reaction from engineers when it comes to audiophiles stems from the fact that audiophiles have a tendency of describing experiences with certain setups in emotional terms rather than analytical ones. You will hear things like "warm", "bright", "harsh", "muddy" and "crisp" because these feelings are often more effective at communicating what is a fairly complicated mixture of technical issues succinctly. Additionally audiophiles have different tastes. Some prefer the closest thing they can get to accurate sound reproduction. Some prefer the distorting effects of tube based amplifiers (and will pay $8000 for a tube amp that can float a piece of paper with only the thermal coming off of it). But this does not make them fools. If they could get the same components for a tenth the price they would. But they can't and to them having good connectors on extremely well built cables is worth the price differential. As is having speakers that won't melt with a few hundred watts being pushed to them. And speaker cables that won't break internally when someone yanks on them or stands on them (and no matter how you protect you things, be they computer, car, or stereo, if you have friends or family in your home the equipment is going to get abused at some point in time).

      The point of this rambling rant (if I have not made it clear by now) is feel free to continue pointing out the fallacies in the marketing of certain materials, but do not denigrate a group of people simply because you do not share the same tastes.

      Your technical responses are generally right on the money, Loren, but the snide comments are not necessary. And actually there is a fair bit of engineering that goes into interconnects and speaker cables (and certainly the receivers, amps, speakers, cd players, DVD players, turn tables, etc) that is very much there to solve certain problems specific to stereo systems.

      Waits for the inevitable stream of grammar and spelling Nazis to descend gleefully on his post as they seek to prove that their own marginal adherence to the mostly archaic forms of the English language makes them superior.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    12. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Its Accoustic Research, not Response.

      Whoopsie. My bad. And their prices ARE better than Best Buy. I bought a 6' digital coax from Lowe's for $9. The same cable at Ovation was in the $50-$60 range, at Best Buy & Circuit City it was ~$40. I misremember which brand Circuit City and Ovation flogs, outside of Monster, but those prices are hard to forget.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    13. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price of course! If you spend $$$ on a speaker cable, you have to convince yourself it sounds better; otherwise, you'll feel like an idiot :-)

    14. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

      Ok, say Im looking to recable my studio (and I am :), what *should* I be using ?

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    15. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Clubber+Lang · · Score: 1

      Ok, say Im looking to recable my studio (and I am :), what *should* I be using ?

      More important than the cables, I'd be worried about the AC wiring. You should have at least a couple of circuits that are "audio only". This will help reduce AC line noise caused by things like fridges and whatnot switching on and off. Don't run your audio cable parallel to power cables wherever you can help it. Make sure all power outlets are properly grounded, a $5 tester from the local hardware store will help with this. Ground loops and improper grounding will cause a lot of hum. Don't use flourescent lights, they put out a lot of 60 cycle hum. You might want to build yourself a little cage out of chicken wire big enough for a person to play a guitar/bass in... it'll make a pretty decent faraday cage in case you can't get single coil pickups to stop humming.

      That's about it off the top of my head... in my experience once you've taken care of the power issues haevy gauge cable with good connectors will do just fine.

      Good luck

      --
      Actuaries - making accountants look interesting since 1949
    16. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by mudshark · · Score: 1

      You can put any random group of audiophiles together with a similarly random set of audio engineers and get a fight going. Part of the problem stems from exactly what's described above, but it goes deeper.

      A lot of engineers assume that audiophiles are poseurs and pretentious wankers easily separated from their money. Sometimes that assumption is incorrect. Likewise, a lot of audiophiles seem to think that engineers determine the quality of a system by reading specs and crunching numbers. It ain't always so. Most audio professionals are passionate about good sound and have really good ears as well as the tech chops necessary to record and/or reinforce musical performances.

      I've been an audio engineer for many years, and a musician for most of my life. I won't have some tweak telling me that just because he uses fuzzy terminology like "warm" or "crisp" that he's got a superior method of describing sounds that I could tell him have excessive second-order distortion in the low midrange or an artificially derived and phase-incoherent overemphasis around 8-10 kHz. And I'm sure he wouldn't want me explaining how my most memorable listening of Mahler's Fourth was a worn cassette tape of the Cleveland Orchestra, played through a car stereo as I lay back on the hood and watched a meteor shower....

      Anyway, that's a roundabout way of saying that we can agree to disagree, but I wish the audiophiles would spend more time listening to the engineers and less time reading glossy magazines.

      --
      In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
    17. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Soulslayer · · Score: 1

      Anyway, that's a roundabout way of saying that we can agree to disagree, but I wish the audiophiles would spend more time listening to the engineers and less time reading glossy magazines.

      Actually I agree with just about every point you make. I don't have a problem with the technical description of the performance of a piece of equipment, nor do I find the fuzzy terminology used by many audiophiles to be offensive.

      Maybe I represent a weird micro-segment of the market but personally I find both views informative. I do find slavish regurgitation of magazine reviews to be irritating no matter the topic. Especially since many of the magazines in the Audiophile scene are rife with inaccuracies and misleading "facts".

      There is also a good deal of the classic "It's more expensive so it must be better" mentality out there. I do not need a $9000 pair of speakers to enjoy my music. But nor do I wish to have a $800 pair of consumer grade Bose speakers when I can get more sonically accurate Vandersteen's for about the same price (or for that matter pay half as much and have a pair of appealing Signet bookshelf units).

      Still, as you so clearly demonstrated in your comment regarding your most memorable listening experience, music should ultimately be about the emotions and memories evoked by what you are listening to, not the hardware driving it. Any true music lover (audiophile or not) should appreciate that.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    18. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      "From my experience much of the snippy reaction from engineers when it comes to audiophiles stems from the fact that audiophiles have a tendency of describing experiences with certain setups in emotional terms rather than analytical ones. You will hear things like "warm", "bright", "harsh", "muddy" and "crisp" because these feelings are often more effective at communicating what is a fairly complicated mixture of technical issues succinctly. Additionally audiophiles have different tastes."

      I think you'll find that audio engineers use these terms more than anyone else. Words like 'bright', and 'muddy, etc., refer to a specific problem with the equalization of a recorded sound. As far as audiophiles having different taste, I'd say that that's best summed up by a quote I heard somewhere "Audiophiles don't listen to the sound, they listen to the noise."

      Just to keep people from making overgeneralized statements about engineers, I'll offer this other observation: Engineers will always think that the audiophile market is a joke -- probably even many of those that make and design such equipment. The reason is fairly personal to many engineers. People spend a large portion of their life studying the construction and use of professional audio gear. Some people even take the time to learn about the physics that governs the nature of the sounds we are trying to reproduce. Professional audio engineers work everyday with the best of the best equipment, or at least the equipment that's best suited for a particular task. We know all about the engineering that goes in to componenents, especially cables and interconnects. We also, god forbid, every once in a while have to go out and make a purchase to install new equipment in a studio or concert venue. We will buy the best cable that is optimized for the task we will use it for. The animosity comes from the fact that the audiophile community makes these outlandishly overpriced purchases, and then proceeds to advertise that their equipment is somehow better than any professional equipment you can buy? Well, I'm sorry, but if audiophile equipment actually reasonably increased the quality of sound, you can be assured that the professional market would have been involved, and you'd find that kind of gear in studios and venues all over the world.

      For the price that some audiophiles spend on their home stereo equipment, they could own their own professional recording studio. Or better yet, plane and front row concert tickets to every show they could possibly ever want to see.

      As far as groups that aren't around to hear anykmore? Well, you're not gonna find any recordings with enough fidelity to make use of any 'audiophile' gear anyways.

      With that, I would hope that people would go to an audio engineer for a question about a certain piece of equipment, including cable, not an audiophile.

      ~Loren

    19. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      Not Monster ;-)

      Seriously, that depends on your budget and the kind of equipment you're using. Mic cables out on the studio floor should be as robust as possible, whereas multicable that stays behind your equipment, or is permanently run through walls and such can be a little more relaxed on the reinforcement. If you pick a distributor and order enough cable through them for your entire studio, you may be able to bargain a discount. The last venue I worked in used Belden multicable for all permanent runs, and Whirlwind snakes and cables on the floor. Speaker runs, if you're curious, were 12 gauge stranded copper pair made by West Penn Wire.

      I made all the fiber interconnects myself, even though I doubt they'll be used in the near future. Past that, we just made whatever cables we needed. I trust my cables more anyways. That way I know they were stripped and soldered with love and care ;-).

      ~Loren

  196. WNT by Density_Altitude · · Score: 1

    A great lie is the supposed "MicroKernel" Windows NT.
    In NT4 it even got graphics engine part of the kernel IIRC
    One of the advantage of a microkernel is easy portability. Ha! Can't wait to run an IIS server on my Dreamcast!!!
    Hey dude what's that new awesome game?
    Thats the newest hit from Microsoft, it's called Code Red!
    It's a peer-to-peer game. We have to avoid getting caught in distributed .NETs

    --
    delete free(system.gc);
  197. Re:Good point.... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    the 6502 was pretty much a RISC chip without the registers

    *smirk*

    If you dealt with the "registers" on a 6502, this is funny. (ah, the freedom of the 680x0 series... yet the Apple ][ was just *so* well put together).

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  198. Speaking of XBox DOA... by kubrick · · Score: 2

    apparently Jeff Minter's XBox died after a day or so.

    How could they do this to the Yak? (Of course, with his fetish for all things bovine, he refers to it as an Xb-ox :)

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
    1. Re:Speaking of XBox DOA... by base3 · · Score: 1

      /me imagines a Gridrunner port to a present-day console . . . Mmmmmm.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  199. Windows through the ages... by elgecko · · Score: 1

    Windows 95: It will be free of MS-DOS Windows 98: It will be free of MS-DOS Windows ME: DOS, you mean DOS? DOS isn't here...

  200. Safe Sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My brother used condoms and died.

    1. Re:Safe Sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately there is no such thing as "safe sex" .. only "safer sex".

      Unless of course you count abstinance

    2. Re:Safe Sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother used condoms and died.

      That's because he used them as chewing gum!

  201. Back when my amiga died... by danamania · · Score: 3, Funny
    I used to use Amigas exclusively, until I spilled coffee into my A1200, which worked for a week afterwards (cleaned & all) but eventually fried itself not much later.

    After phoning an Amiga vendor in Sydney, I asked about the prices for a new A1200, and chatted about Amigas in general - A1200's were still pretty expensive, around $1000 australian for one, and I commented on the price, also noting I'd been looking at a second hand powermac for a fifth of what he was charging.

    In all seriousness he told me "An Amiga can emulate a macintosh faster than the fastest Mac runs".

    This was apparently true for a few months When the first 68040 Amigas came out, but I'm damned sure quoting it to me in 2000 when G4's were hitting 500Mhz is just a small lie :P.

    1. Re:Back when my amiga died... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In all seriousness he told me "An Amiga can emulate a macintosh faster than the fastest Mac runs".

      This is one of the classic "Amiga Retard" quotes. Some other retard told them this and they believed it, because as we all know, the Amiga is the best computer ever!! And still is!!!

      Then why is every Amiga user a peanut-headed dweeb who has never kissed a girl?

    2. Re:Back when my amiga died... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..if you could only have seen the acid-fueled sex sessions I used to have with my gf at the time, all with these crazy mods running over and over again, the screen flashing. I'd LOVE to relive those days again! Of course, I'd probaby be frowned up for fucking a 17 year old girl now, but MAN she was hot!

    3. Re:Back when my amiga died... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It was always true until the macs moved to PPC, An Amiga with the same cpu as a mac would outperform it by about 5% on average, and no macs were available with the 68060 processor, which actually gave the low end PPC`s a run for it`s money... and at the time, when most ppc macs ran under emulation... completely trashed it.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  202. Sticks and rocks by LastToKnow · · Score: 1

    Back when I was a wee lad, we my dad for some reason agreed to let this guy come to our house to sell us this food service thing, where we'd get a freezer and have food delivered every so often, or some such thing.

    My mother wasn't taking well to the pitch at all but it was when the guy said "our beef is higher quality than what you'll get in the supermarket. Our cows are fed a healthy diet of [corn or some cow food I forget]. The cows that go to your supermarket are fed only sticks and rocks" that my mother finally gave him the boot.

  203. Re:Kikes 'n' coons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DeMe is a drug addict. I am not trolling. He'll +b you if you aren't careful. I'm rambling. NEG ME! Please? I'm not high. Shh, I'm not. I'm just happy. Very happy. Happy! 3 being happy.

    DALnet is sexy.
    Services rule.

  204. Sega vs. Nintindo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Long ago, Nintindo was party to many 'anti-competitive' practicies regarding their rival, sega.

    The most notable of these practices was putting out fake press released about upcoming nintindo products claiming to be comprable to newly released sega products... Their announcment of the SNES system held so much weight with gamers in getting them to hold off on buying a Genesis, they started using this power against all new sega products even if they had no intention of releasing the products they were announcing.

    One of the most notable claims they made was the "Nintindo CD Add-on" to the SNES that they announced with the release of the SegaCD.

    1. Re:Sega vs. Nintindo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to spell Nintendo, you ignorant fuck.

    2. Re:Sega vs. Nintindo by slakdrgn · · Score: 1

      Infact, a CD-ADDON was in production, but (if I'm not mistaken) nintendo decided to say no, and sony went on their way to create the PSX. Do a search on google for "Nintendo History" pretty interesting stuff. :)

  205. Back in the Netscape days, at Staples by Racine · · Score: 1

    I overheard a couple talking to a salsemsn about Netscape Navigator, and they asked what the difference was between the one in the box and the one you could download. He said, "Yes, there is a version you can download, but it doesn't have as many features and things as the retail one."

    To this day I still don't know why I didn't 'step in', but I figured 'Hey, this country operates by people trying to make money off of stupid people, who am I to change things?'

    --
    Tcl my Pico! There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
    1. Re:Back in the Netscape days, at Staples by Myrv · · Score: 1

      Actually this was true.

      In the early days Netscape sold a Gold version in retail which included the HTML editor whereas the downloadable verson was only the browser (Navigator).

    2. Re:Back in the Netscape days, at Staples by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 2
      Myrv wrote:

      In the early days Netscape sold a Gold version in retail which included the HTML editor whereas the downloadable verson was only the browser (Navigator).

      Not quite. You could download the Gold version too, but you were expected to pay for it after the eval period expired. The base version had an indefinite eval period (i.e. it was never specified how long it was) and certain entities like nonprofits and educationals could use it free of charge.

      --
      -- Old Man Kensey
  206. Re:Kikes 'n' coons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DeMe, you are a dog lovin' cow.

    "w00t,"
    Meerkat

  207. Biggest Lie by Beatlebum · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Chicks dig Unix Manuals"

    1. Re:Biggest Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      die bitch. not a lie. its a fact. pull your head out of your ass.

    2. Re:Biggest Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      0.24%.

      That's some revolution. Ha ha!

  208. Re:Kikes 'n' coons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aselam you all, my brethren!
    May allah shine his devine light upon you like a lensflare from the heavans above.

    Catir, aniec.

  209. Before a merger by Garg · · Score: 1

    One of my former employers actually sent a six-figure (in price) minicomputer to a customer that hadn't ordered it, to count it as a 'sale' just before they were acquired by another company. They were doing a lot of other shady crap too. After the merger went through, all the dirty deeds came to light, and the stock price of the new combined company dropped from around $80 to about $12.

    Needless to say, those guys are facing stockholder lawsuits and possible jail time.

    Garg

    --
    Garg
    Alumnus, Xavier's School for Gifted Youngsters
  210. Re:Kikes 'n' coons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an ãÑÍÈÇ for you!

    Selam!
    J^Raxis

  211. CompUSA and surge protectors by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 2, Funny
    Last month, needing a new surge protector / power strip for my TV system, I noticed that the surge protectors in the computer department cost half as much as the ones in the video department.


    when I asked the salesman in the video department about cables i also needed, and he saw that i had a surge protector (different from those in his department), he tried to pitch his units.


    i asked him the difference between his and the ones across the store. "oh, these ones are specially made for home entertainment systems."


    i was intrigued, and asked him exactly how. "oh, the voltage is different, and these are made for TV systems circuits."


    yeah. thanks, dude. now go away...

    --
    mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
  212. Re:Kikes 'n' coons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meerkat..you are one to talk. Go fulfill your necrodandrophiliac fantasy by molesting a dead shrub...freakzoid.

  213. Merced ready by Gerdts · · Score: 1

    In the spring/summer of 1997 I was in the market for about 40 workstations for running engineering apps. We were an HP shop at the time and our friendly HP salesperson of the month explained to me how the C180 system boards were pin compatible with the Merced, which was due out in about a year. This would be an investment protection because we all know how fast Intel's first attempt at a 64-bit chip is going to be, right?

    When I asked him what the current status of the chip was, he told me that one of the big three auto makers (I think he said GM) had converted almost entirely to HP workstations running beta merceds and the performance was quite good compared to the PA7800 (or did the C180 come with the PA8000?).

    The following year we bought Ultra 10's. They cost 1/3 as much and performed just as well as whatever HP was hocking at the time. Rather ironically, the Ultra 10's did actually come with a certain amount of x86 compatiblity with the SunPCi cards that they came with. :)

  214. Re:Good point.... by Fesh · · Score: 2

    Cyrix used to do that... I fell for it back when I didn't know any better (5x86)... Of course, you see where they are now...

    --
    --Fesh
    Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  215. Most outrageous vendor lie? by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    "Shared Source"

  216. Creative Labs Modem by jjsjeff · · Score: 1

    Less than 6 months ago I saw a shinkwrapped retail Creative Labs 56k modem at Wal-Mart with a sticker on the box that said "Y2K and MP3 Compatible."

    Its a sorry bastard that is gonna be buying that modem. I remember *trying* to download MP3s over a dialup line. :(

    -Jeff

  217. Someone sold a Class A IP network... by pnelson · · Score: 1

    Didn't I read here on /. that a consultant sold someone an entire class A range of IP numbers for their business... starting with 10.x.x.x ? ;-^)

  218. The actual product name of that press release... by Nevrar · · Score: 1

    The sample press release with names altered out from that vendor hype article actually belongs to TrueAdvantage
    (see here... - thx google :)

    --
    Nevrar
  219. Re:Kikes 'n' coons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUCK off, you.

  220. Most Outrageous: Java Platform Independent Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look no further than your next Slashdot news item.

  221. 640K... by packeteer · · Score: 2, Funny

    is enough for anyone

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  222. From Today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sun is releasing a white paper on their new "Java Games Profile." Their ultimate goal? To have one CD you could pop into an Xbox, a PS2, a Windows machine, or a Linux machine, and play the same game on them all.

  223. The fast computer by steveha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A few years back, my Mom wanted to buy a computer. She asked my older brother what to get. "Don't buy an IBM AT, buy a compatible with a 386." She in turn asked my other brother, and me, and we all gave the same answer: get a 386.

    So she bought an IBM PC AT with a 286 and 512 KB of RAM. "Why?!?!?" I asked.

    "Well, the salesman told me it was the fastest computer they made." Okay, the AT he sold her was an 8 MHz 286, not the usual 6 MHz 286, and that did in fact make it the fastest PC AT that IBM ever made. But any 386 would have smoked it, and been able to run real software as well.

    Not a vendor lie story, but still interesting, is the postscript to this story. After a year or so, the power supply in her AT died. As it died, it fried her motherboard too. We contacted IBM, and they informed us that we would have to ship the computer to them, then wait 6 to 8 weeks, for a repair; there would be no guarantee of any sort on the repair; and it would cost $X00 (I don't remember exactly how much but it was a lot). And of course after all this she would still have a 286 running at 8 MHz.

    We went down to a friendly local computer shop. They installed a new power supply, a new motherboard with a 386SX and 2 MB of RAM, and a new VGA-compatible display adapter. They burned it in overnight to make sure all was working, and we picked it up the next day. Total cost was less than IBM had wanted to repair the AT.

    I like to tell this story when people don't understand why I like my computers to be made from standard, easily-replaceable parts. (Apple's new iMac is cute, but I don't want one.)

    My mom still has that computer, by the way, and it still works.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:The fast computer by theSprocket · · Score: 1

      Oh my god!!

      We must be long lost brothers. My mom did the same thing and we still have it too.

  224. Did everyone forget? by rampant+mac · · Score: 1

    Linux on the Desktop....

    Oops.

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  225. Re:Good point.... by digitalunity · · Score: 2

    mmm.... AltiVec goodness.

    I think I wet myself.

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  226. Old mother hubbard DMCA, Google delists Slashdot by G-funk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Posted by CmdrNacho on Monday March 25, @06:51AM
    From the "we should have seen this coming" dept.
    Well it looks like our (ex) favourite search engine, Google has delisted slashdot due to a DMCA threat recieved by the scientologists this morning.

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  227. How about every cheap digital camera vendor? by Digypro · · Score: 1

    When you search on price scanning sites and see those wonderful deals on digital cameras and such, it has been my experiance that almost every one of the vendors will say absolutly anything to get you to buy more. For instance I was told when buying by Sony trv-17 that a .4 wide angle lens is better then a .3, because a .3 casues too much barrel distortion (all wide angles do) when i asked for a .3 they didnt have. tsk tsk they still havent refunded me for some otehr mistakes.

  228. I cannot believe noone thought of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    is not every microsoft list of "system requirements" for the OS/App of the month at least half of what's actually required? consistantly? that deserves respect here, especially since the suckers still buy in.

    heh.

    Williw

  229. How I learned to stop worrying and use 802.11 ... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

    I live in downtown Philadelphia. I was delighted to hear that my particular neighborhood was in comcast country. (We lost our local ABC channels when Turner and Disney had their little pissing contest the year before.)

    Suffice to say after several (previosly mentioned by fellow slashdotters) after yatting with a few of the service guys at the local diner, I learned that it just wasn't happening.

    Fortunately I live about a block from work, so I am in the process of rigging some 802.11 from to roof for broadband. There are times where it is good to be the admin.

    Muhahahahahah

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  230. I belive that's "buttonholer" by Myself · · Score: 2

    Like the things your buttons go into, that have the stitched reinforcements on the sides?

    Still, a hilarious typo.

  231. DV-in enabled on camcorders by smallstepforman · · Score: 2

    Back in the 2nd half of the 90's, DV (digital video) poised to take the consumer video camcorder market by storm. The pesky Europeans had a taxation clause which added a hefty tax on professional digital video recorders, which would have also included consumer camcorders. The manufacturers disabled DV-IN in order to avoid this hefty sales tax. Australia on the other hand did not have this stupid tax, so most camcorders shipped with DV-IN enabled (just like in the US).

    So I step into Ted's cameras (a big franchise in Australia) and ask for a Canon-MV1 (a PAL version of the Optura) and specifically ask if DV-IN was enabled. "Yes, all our cameras have DV-IN enabled". "Fine, here is the $3600 for the camera". 18 months later I finally purchase a Firewire card, and guess what, DV-IN is disabled on my model. Who do I complain to? It sucks, doesn't it.

    --
    Revolution = Evolution
  232. I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there a description of what flamebait is somewhere? This is really starting to get on my nerves. Seems like I get modded down as flamebait quite a bit. Either there's something to the way I post, or some people's definition of what flambebait is a little off from mine. I'm asking for clarification.

    I am dead serious this is what they said. I used to work for a game retailer. I used to sell those stupid things and the first run of them had a very high (1 in 4) defect rate! Couple that with a shortage, and you have a PR problem. Sony's response was 'The customers are mistreating the systems.'

    I kid you not. I'm not exaggerating, that is what REALLY HAPPENED.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by The_dev0 · · Score: 1
      I also can't find anything unreasonable with your post. It's all completely true we had HUNDREDS of returns at our dept store over the faulty lid-switch thingy, and the only reason I can think you are getting modded down is because there is a pussy ps-owning moderator out there who doesn't like hearing the truth about his pride and joy. Don't worry too much though mate, I've got the slashdot karma thing sussed:

      Modded Up: Comments about Linux being the best.

      Modded Down: Comments based on anything else, or when you point out the "Modded up" rule.

      Here it comes.....

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    2. Re:I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      I got modded down earlier today as flamebait because I made a post that said Win2k was stable. Somebody posted that MS made promises along the lines of 'greater stability' and accused them of lying. So I responded with my insight into it as the asistant system administrator that the 17 or so Win2k machines we have are great and none of my office mates have been able to break them.

      For some reason, that's not only offtopic, that's flamebait. *Shrug*

      Good thing my feelings aren't hurt. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by 0xA · · Score: 1
      Whoa there buddy! You have a pretty recent UID there don't ya. You better get a clue pal.


      this is www.slashdot.org not www.truth.org or www.rocktheboat.org


      We don't want none of that "factual" shit around here.

    4. Re:I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by berniecase · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Coming from an environment where I have to support our software on Proxy 2.0/NT4, or ISA/Win2K, Win2K is loads better. Win2K is stable, compared to the crap that was NT.

      --Bernie

    5. Re:I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "I couldn't agree more. Coming from an environment where I have to support our software on Proxy 2.0/NT4, or ISA/Win2K, Win2K is loads better. Win2K is stable, compared to the crap that was NT"

      Careful there! You'll get modded down as flame bait! ;)

      Wanna know what's embarrasing? I made a few posts over the weekend defending Win2k and I tried to pull my laptop out of suspend today and it refused. Figures, eh? Had to pull the battery out. Heh I haven't had to do that in ages!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by berniecase · · Score: 1

      I guess I'll have to be content with near-instant wakeups from my OS X PowerBook ;-) The last time I had to do a hard reset on it was about two years ago.

      Yep, I'm a Mac user who supports NT/Win2K software, as well as Linux boxes. Just another reason to flame me.

      --Bernie

    7. Re:I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Mac is definitely the king of Laptops. I seriously think my next laptop purchase will be a Mac. It's a shame I couldn't get Linux to work on my Laptop, then I'd be *cough* cool like everybody else here.

      I might try SuSE, though. A few people here suggested it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my OS X PowerBook ;-) The last time I had to do a hard reset on it was about two years ago.

      Typical Mac user. Always lying.

  233. Thanks :) by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to show my appreciation to those who listened to me. Thank you.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  234. No by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    Well, it's a de facto standard due to MS' market share and it could well be a standard in (lousy) reliability and (poor) performance if we ignore the implied meaning.

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  235. Yep, you're right! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Like the things your buttons go into, that have the stitched reinforcements on the sides?"

    Yes, you are quite right. It was in either a Sear's ad or a JC Penny's ad, but my dad did show it to me. I have the image somewhere on a CD, but I don't think I could find it and post it before this topic loses interest.

    I forgot to mention this was back in like the 60's or 70's. Not sure which but it was definitely a more conservative time. Today 'buttholer' is Beavis and Butthead funny, but I bet when this ad went to print people called up deeply offended, threatening to cancel subscriptions on their newspapers etc. Heh.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  236. Re:The $cientologists already have harassed Slashd by nat5an · · Score: 1

    Actually, Google restored the links to Xenu.net on Friday. It was a front page story on Yahoo!

    --
    Head down, go to sleep to the rhythm of the war drums...
  237. Microsoft was founded on lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In his autobiography, Bill Gates admitted that he lied to IBM about having their BASIC interpreter almost complete. That little lie got him the contract. He lied again when he claimed to have the operating system almost complete. That little lie got him the market and customer lock-in that he has based his monopoly upon.

    Further along the lines of deception, Microsoft put up a little notice that Windows was not reliable on Dr. DOS, then set it up to crash after posting the notice. Microsoft also remapped Quicktime file suffixes to Windows Media Player without telling the users. Microsoft even put buggy APIs in their operating system, while at the same time, they implemented undocumented, non-buggy versions of the APIs for their own products to use.

    Frankly, it is foolish to trust Microsoft at all. Things Microsoft is saying today will almost certainly be uncovered as lies in a couple years. Does anyone really believe that .NET will be cross-platform? Does anyone, besides Miguel De Icaza, believe that Mono will be fully compatible with CLR?

    1. Re:Microsoft was founded on lies by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      (* In his autobiography, Bill Gates admitted that he lied to IBM about having their BASIC interpreter almost complete. That little lie got him the contract. *)

      That, unfortunately, is a "standard business practice".

      Politicians and businesses could not survive on an individual basis if they didn't use such BS, because their competitors do.

      One company I worked for had an engineering division who sent a custom product to the user and a technician with it to do a "site check". In reality, the "site check" was finishing the product. The poor engineer kept getting asked why the "site check" took so long.

      Then there are stories of more blatent lies beyond "just about finished", but those are another topic.

  238. Biggest lie I ever heard by MsWillow · · Score: 2, Informative

    The veep of Engineering was a total moron, chosen because he must have been blowing the CEO behind closed doors. Anyways, one day while he was out with a large potential customer, trying to sell them scads of huge automotive engine testers, he was asked "What operating system does it use?"

    He told them, "Word." They, apparently, believed him., as they bought a bunch of them.

    --

    Lemon curry?
  239. Re:Good point.... by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

    Cyrix chips also had compatability issues with Intel processors. Although I must say, I used to work in a computer store and we would always explain the whole PR thing to customers, and upon hearing that, most didn't want the Cyrix. People are just too fixated on sheer MHz.

  240. Making MS Office Work by andaru · · Score: 2
    I saw a 500+ page book called Making Microsoft Office Work.

    I always thought that the last chapter should be, "What do I do if it still doesn't work?"

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

    1. Re:Making MS Office Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand, the thesis of the book was "how to make work for yourself by trying to use Microsoft Office."

  241. Scraping cat shit by andaru · · Score: 2

    Scraping the encrusted cat shit from the litterbox will suddenly become a joy, not a chore.

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

  242. Car dealership by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

    Those aren't bullet holes...they're speed holes!

  243. Re:Missed the point by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    The point he was trying to make is that "Replace the PS2 with an XBox because the XBox is more reliable" is a flat out lie. If a salesman told this to me I would punch him in the face. If he said "Replace the PS2 with an XBox because the XBox is more fun", he would still be lying, but I wouldn't punch him in the face. (I would just tell him to get the hell away from me)

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  244. Matrox Marvel and Win2K.... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

    The worst for me (personal) was what Matrox did with the G400 Marvel - a nice bit of kit for video capture under Win98. Drivers were promised - a Win2K version was comming - and in the end, they turn the card into nothing more than a TV-Tuner if you want to run under Win2K. Very nice. (grrrr) Win9x was no treat with large files and what not... not the OS for (low end) video editing. When push came to shove, they pointed out it never actually said they supported Win2K - though they sure as hell hinted.

    They "offered" a credit to buy the Marvel G450(?) for ~$250 (about what you paid on-line anyhow) that only did software encoding rather than the hardware encoding the G400 would do.

    May they rot in hell.... Not that I'm bitter, 'cause I'm not.

  245. Best demos? by sunhou · · Score: 2

    Sometime within the last couple of years, there was a similar article asking about the best demo presentations people had given. Basically, a similar question, but from the opposite perspective. Some people had some pretty good stories to tell. I went searching for it a month or so ago, but didn't find it. Anyone remember some specific words from the title of the article so it would be easier to find?

  246. Song: "The Stalker" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am just Seth the Finkelstein
    And worked without fail
    On that which I was assigned
    Others may try to curtail
    My glorious prowess
    Over programming structure
    But they no less
    Than a pile of manure
    As all my lies are just
    All my time is valuable

    Stalk, Stalk, Stalk
    Gosh the others they cry
    All I do is subvert and lie
    Stalk Stalk stalk stalk till they die

  247. Liars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest lies I have ever been told have been by my employer.

    "We plan to add a 401K plan this year".
    "Our matching plan is BETTER than a 401K"
    "We pay for overtime worked"
    "We anticipate 50%/annum growth this year"
    "This is an informal low-stress company"
    "most people work from 9 to 6"
    "we offer a competitive salary plan"
    "your raise is being reviewed, we will get back to you shortly on the amount, which will be retroactive to your anniversary"
    "we are going to replace our obsolete systems next month"
    "we will hire additional staff this month to relieve the overworked sysadmin team"

  248. Used Computer parts by Chayce · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a computer resale store and here are the biggest lies I ever heard:
    1) Yes we sell licenced copys of windows with every machine. (Win 3.1 days... our copies were on ubiquitus black verbatim disks with pen written lables all registered to elvis...)

    2) Wow I can't believe you had problems with the hardware we sold, we test everything top to bottom before we sell it. (Yup we looked at it.. if no smoke stains must be good)

    3) Of course a Cirix 486-120Mhz runs almost as fast as a P-120 (yeah in MS dos 6.22 who can tell?)

    4) We have a well trained staff who caters to our customers needs. (Yes, and to their own... getting your comp back with 16M of ram instead of 32 but with the resolution turned up fools a lot of people)

    Needless to say I didn't work there too long...

    --
    I like replies better than Karma, even if they are flames, because that tells me I got someone thinking.
  249. Master/Slave by hasphar · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is from the mouth of a third level tech support from Maxtor explaining why their 20 gig HD doesn't work with their 8 gig HD on the same IDE cable.....
    "Well the Master/Slave on an IDE cable is only a theory, so it doesn't always work.

    1. Re:Master/Slave by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      Funny as it might seem, I've actually seen a few drives that just will NOT work together, no matter how you set the jumpers. Usually just end up switching one with one of the drives on the other cable when possible, but it can be irritating nontheless.

    2. Re:Master/Slave by theSprocket · · Score: 1

      Here is the best solution to your maxtor problem.

      Step One:
      Don't use maxtor

    3. Re:Master/Slave by Conspiracy+Theorist · · Score: 1

      speaking of IDE and lies...

      About two years ago my in-laws bought a Gateway PC. They loaded it up to the hilt, 933 Mhz PIII, 256MB RAM, 50GB HD, CD/DVD ROM, CD/RW, internal zip250, a half a dozen software bundles (seriously), etc.

      It came with an external zip100 (paralell port) drive and no written explanation for the switch. When they called up to find out why, they were told there was no room for the drive in the case. When I found out I was pissed because I knew there was both physical room (it was a mid tower) and there were only three IDE devices. I told my in-laws this and they called back to insist there was room and to inquire why an external zip250 hadn't been shipped anyway. Tech support insisted that there wasn't room and that no one made external zip250 drives. Six months earlier I had held in my hands a USB zip250 drive that was purchased at a store. They called back again and this time let me speak to tech support. It turns out that the motherboard that had been sold with their system "didn't work well" with four IDE devices in use! They also agreed to ship out an external USB zip250 which were apparently in production now whereas two days ago they weren't.

  250. Improve your BLANK experience by andaru · · Score: 2
    Anytime they say anything about improving your experience with something (i.e., the web), it just means that they want to more accurately target their advertisements at you.

    The assumption being that the quality of your experience with the web is directly proportional to how well they can target advertisements at you.

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

  251. Quit dogging Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you dumbasses realize that all the problems with Microsoft are what's keeping you in your job outside of the MS universe?

    And for those of us that do IT support for small businesses, THEY DON'T USE ANYTHING BUT MICROSOFT!
    They don't understand anything else, there are no off the shelf utilities and programs for them, no other office suite than MS Office has the balls to sell to every business and government agency in the world, and there are no department stores that they can go to on "Sunday at the mall" to find someone to sell them on something else.

    So, until one of you has the brains to write your own Office Suite and promote it to everyone in the world, or until you guys want to sell on Sunday, SHUT UP! Bill will hang himself.

    1. Re:Quit dogging Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice troll.

  252. 30fps full screen streaming video over a 28.8 by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

    connection. That was almost ten years ago. The company set up a demo in the board room that ran the client on the same box as the server (dual PPro200).

    Funny, after we bought it all the support calls worked via pay-by-minute software. Sucked to be one of those trying to do non-nature show streaming video at the time. Ah, can you give us any reference accounts (wicked grins - and a lot of pr0n later...)

  253. Absolute number 1 lie from a vendor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100% uptime.

  254. [OT] Re:Cigarettes by egerlach · · Score: 1

    So we either get rid of the guns or the people who would use them to kill. Which do *you* think is easier, hmmm?

    --

    "Free beer tends to lead to free speech"
    1. Re:[OT] Re:Cigarettes by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      Obviously getting rid of the people with the urge to kill. Because if you get rid of the guns, they will find more, fabricate more, or devise a suitable replacement. And then you'll have a bunch of victims unable to defend themselves against a well-armed aggressor.

    2. Re:[OT] Re:Cigarettes by Matthaeus · · Score: 1

      Nonsense! All I need is a bunch of fresh elderberries!

    3. Re:[OT] Re:Cigarettes by Associate · · Score: 1

      How exactly do you propose we get rid of the people who want to kill?

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    4. Re:[OT] Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them kill each other and lock up the last one left.

    5. Re:[OT] Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, why don't you get rid of the airplanes, too, while you're at it Mr. Social Genius?

    6. Re:[OT] Re:Cigarettes by adamy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it was a bunch of bananas.
      No, wait, if they attack with the banans, pull the lever releasing the 200lb weight.

      --
      Open Source Identity Management: FreeIPA.org
    7. Re:[OT] Re:Cigarettes by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      What about point-ed sticks?

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    8. Re:[OT] Re:Cigarettes by egerlach · · Score: 1

      Precisely.

      --

      "Free beer tends to lead to free speech"
    9. Re:[OT] Re:Cigarettes by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Statistically, the vast majority of crime is proven to have been comitted by living people. Therefore, as a long term crime prevention measure, please proceed to your death camp now. You will find the state of un-livingness to be much more relaxing, in addition to lowering insurance premiums for the entire world due to an overall reduction in crime.

  255. One word by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    Prey.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    1. Re:One word by laserjet · · Score: 2

      I hear you man, and am praying with you. That game changed my life.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:One word by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      No, no, 'Prey' the game, supposed to be the Quake killer, used portal technology instead of B-trees, and was recently RE-announced.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  256. i saw this by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i saw this advertisement in the paper once... it said, 'last chance to send your $5 to '

    so me, being the copycat i am, i did the same in my local paper... in BIG bold print, i wrote, LAST CHANCE TO SEND YOU $5 TO ... THIS WILL BE THE LAST TIME YOU SEE THIS MESSAGE TO GET IN ON IT JUST SEND IN YOUR $5!'

    i got about $750 ... but again, i was also 6 years old... i had a hell of alot of fun with that one.

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    1. Re:i saw this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem.. Bullshit.

  257. Want a piece? by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    I heard of a few people here who got vaguely harrassing e-mail from the Co$. Don't know if it was related to negative comments they posted after the comment removal incident, but if it was... heh heh. Come and get us. I can't think of many better technical communities to challenge than Slashdot--probably because of its unique aggressive flavor that arises in times of conflict. :)

  258. From the Windows 95 install ads by sharkey · · Score: 2

    "Whatever you do will now be faster and more fun!"

    I'd love see to a class-action brought by people who did not pass their kidney stones faster, and certainly didn't have more fun doing so, after installing Windows 95.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  259. Re: Guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er, um, no. The first is "x doesn't y z. z y z". In your example, you switched it to "x doesn't y x. z y x".

    For your statment to be accurate, you should have said, "Toasters don't make people. People make people".

  260. Re:Good point.... by starslab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    yes, but Cyrix wasn't conservative at ALL with their PR numbers. Cyrix's numbers were complete bullshit. AMD's numbers actually have a bearing on reality.

    Cyrix's CPUs were both inferior clock-for-clock and did not run as fast as Intel CPUs. Cyrix tried a PR scheme to fool stupid people into buying crap.

    AMD's CPUs are superiour clock-for-clock but do not run as fast as Intel CPUs. AMD is using a PR scheme to prevent stupid people falling into the MHz pit. As far as I'm concerned, AMD is doing 'em a favor.

  261. A Vendor with big blue letters... by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

    When estimating the amount of time required for few of it's consultants to complete a set of tasks, estimated that 6000 hours would be required. (at $200/hour)

    One small problem.

    My boss and I completed the tasks in three days.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  262. apple :) by Perdo · · Score: 2

    "fearsomely fast Power Mac G4 squarely in the lead as the ultimate high-end graphics workstation"

    "Graphics performance is off the charts

    "The dual 1GHz Power Mac G4 is an astonishing 72 percent faster than the fastest PC on the market

    "The PowerPC G4 with Velocity Engine -- the chip that put supercomputing power on the desktop with the original Power Mac G4"

    ha.. ha haa hoo HOO HAA ha haa!

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:apple :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick perusal of your posting history reveals that you are clearly mentally ill. Please get some help.

    2. Re:apple :) by ptbrown · · Score: 2

      Don't forget:

      "Run Windows apps as fast as a PC."

      and...

      "Of course you'll be able to upgrade your PowerBook to a G3." (They got sued over that one.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
    3. Re:apple :) by Perdo · · Score: 2

      I have a nice Powerbook 1400 with a G3, thank you class action. I also have a few LC 574s, with processor upgrades (PPC 603), that I recieved the option to purchase after a class action suit against Apple. My $150 times three machines bought me a factory Mac technicians time for six full eight hour days. One machine never did work, which Apple replaced with a new 5200, with monitor. Apple's promises have cost them plenty, including my loyalty. Now I Post lots of intelligent comments to slashdot, just so I can post Apple flames at +2.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    4. Re:apple :) by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2

      And "Apple II Forever!"

    5. Re:apple :) by Perdo · · Score: 2

      My Apple IIe lasted 17 years... The drive died without a replacement to be found anywhere. I tried and tried to boot it, it booted once more. Into a game I played on it for 17 years, StarMaze. The power went out 4 months later and it never booted again. I made it to seventh level on a fluke. I had never made it past fifth in 17 years of play. I never finished it. I don't think anybody ever did. I found a rom of it, and it played just the same. except the axis contol of the joystick was off. An no joystick has ever come close to the feel of the Mach III.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    6. Re:apple :) by thunderbee · · Score: 1

      My Apple //e is also 17 years old, and still working. I sometimes hook it up to my TV and play an old game. I rigged the apple joystick to work on a PC, and guess what - it still works too. Probably the best joystick I ever had, still precise and never broke.
      The //e was probably the best computer I owned.

      --
      In my opinion, Scientology is a cult you should avoid.
  263. You need extra shielding for digital by andaru · · Score: 2
    Ever see RCA cables made specifically for S/PDIF (digital audio)?

    They often have triple shielding and claim that shielding is much more crucial for digital cables, when the truth is the exact opposite. You only need the shielding if you are passing through analog audio, where the noise is inseparable from the signal.

    Using S/PDIF over the shittiest RCA cable you can find, with large amounts of interference, you still won't lose a single bit of data in the transfer.

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

    1. Re:You need extra shielding for digital by sigwinch · · Score: 2
      Using S/PDIF over the shittiest RCA cable you can find, with large amounts of interference, you still won't lose a single bit of data in the transfer.
      True, but that's not the point. The fancy shielding is to keep the digital noise from leaking into analog audio and video signals, as well as nearby radio receivers.
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    2. Re:You need extra shielding for digital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, not quite. Consider what would happen to your digital signal with an A/C wire run parallel to it?

      Would it sound just like cassete tapes with that 60Hz hum? I doubt it.

    3. Re:You need extra shielding for digital by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

      My SB Live is plugged into my Digital (AC3) receiver right now, using this cheap, old, 25' long RCA cable (thinner than most of my other cables, and it doesn't carry video very well). No troubles. I never lose signal. Run the same cable in analog mode, and watch out for the hum/hiss/crackle!

      S

    4. Re:You need extra shielding for digital by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      Well, technically the worst is optical video. Any intelligent audio guy will tell you coax is better for digital...you lose no data, whereas optical drops it all the time. Optical cable crimps easily and is full of imperfections. And yet, units with optical digital out are prized by purchasers and touted by the 8 buck an hour "experts."

      This is why it's essential that you find a store you can trust before buying audio components. I test mine by asking them their opinions of the new Bose stuff (utter crap with cheap paper cones that tear and sound quite soggy when compared with speakers half their cost). If they try to pass it off as TOL, I leave. If they show me a set of Tannoys, Energies or Paradigms and mention how they are larger but outperform the Bose in every respect (especially price), I feel I can trust them.

      It also helps if they don't tell you everything you look at "is the last one I got and a guy was just in here looking at it." The guy who sold me my receiver and first set of eXL-16s did that to me, and though I bought the stuff anyway I really resented it.

      Oh, and the dumbest thing ever? Gold plated optical connectors. I confound you all to find a single use for reflective gold plating on the outside of a plastic fiber that channels a laserbeam that never comes close to the gold plating.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  264. Oracle... by Unpossible · · Score: 1

    Unbreakable

  265. Diakatana team to develop Windows 2004 by doublem · · Score: 2


    Diakatana team to develop Windows 2004 (Codename Mordor)

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Diakatana team to develop Windows 2004 by majestyk2000 · · Score: 1

      I gather there will be a 'web ring' dedicated to it?

    2. Re:Diakatana team to develop Windows 2004 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, you must be american, right? Only an american could butcher the english language:

      - developer off
      - the new NT 6.0 er- Windows 2004 OS (huh?)
      - mould (british spelling)
      - an instillation option
      - save jems
      - Nvidea (imaginary corp?)

      And finally, there's nothing funny on that page, except for the KillCreek comment, but hey, it's pretty hard to say anything that is NOT funny about her.

  266. The Source by waldoj · · Score: 2, Informative

    The advertisement is from the Kansas City Star, circa 1970s. I happen to have a copy here, in National Lampoon's "True Facts: The Big Book." [1] The ad reads:

    "Convertible free-arm sewing machine
    Has 12 built-in, dial-to-sew stitches plus built-in button-holer. Includes 4 utility, 4 stretch, 4 decorative stitches. Built-in blind hemmer-mending stitch. Ask about Maintenancec Agreements. $159.95."

    And on the left-hand side, in a white field, it reads "Built-in Buttholer!"

    -Waldo Jaquith

    [1] ISBN 0-8092-3559-2

  267. Unsinkable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vendor: This ship is totally unsinkable!!

    Buyer: really?

    Vendor: yup, it is the biggest ever built

    buyer: ok I'll take it. whats its name?

    Vendor:The Titanic

  268. Windows by ralian · · Score: 1

    I found a 99$ window and tried to install it on my computer, but it wouldn't fit in the CD drive.

    --

    -raph

  269. r u sure... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

    it wasn't supposed to be an Atomic Butt-holer?

  270. Java3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There are no known performance issues with Java3D"

    -- in the context of talking about whether or not it was too slow for graphic-intensive games --

  271. I noticed that too! by gfxguy · · Score: 2

    While there is more consistency now, at Best Buy you would look at all the expensive speakers in the computer department, wander over to the stereo department and get something similar for a lot less. The same thing went for audio cables and CD holders, headphones...

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
    1. Re:I noticed that too! by Boing · · Score: 1

      Not to mention CD wallets. I don't know if they still do it, but for a while Best Buy sold two products: a CD wallet and a CD-ROM wallet. The CD wallet was about five extra bucks, presumably because more people buy it. However, they were exactly the same product, with a different label. Needless to say, I bought the CD wallet. Wouldn't want it to be "incompatible". ;-)

      Actually, I bought the CD-ROM wallet, thinking I was foiling their plan, but as it turns out I actually keep CD-ROMs in it. Never know when you're going to need the Quake 1 demo CD, or drivers for a printer I threw out years ago.

  272. 3 letters: MRE by miniver · · Score: 2

    I've done my time in the US military, and the biggest lie I was told, during my enlisted service, was ...

    MRE = Meal, Ready to Eat

    1. It wasn't a meal.
    2. It wasn't ready.
    3. It wasn't edible.
    --
    We call it art because we have names for the things we understand.
    1. Re:3 letters: MRE by NavySpy · · Score: 1

      Oh, man, I'll give you the not ready part, at least for the main course, but MREs are great, especially when compared to the K-rats before them. I loved MRE's, especially the tabasco sauce. And it is a meal -- each one has 2500 calories if you consume the whole thing.

    2. Re:3 letters: MRE by miniver · · Score: 2
      Oh, man, I'll give you the not ready part, at least for the main course, but MREs are great , especially when compared to the K-rats before them. I loved MRE's, especially the tabasco sauce. And it is a meal -- each one has 2500 calories if you consume the whole thing.

      Having not had K-rats, I'll take your word on the improvement ... but MRE's made the worst Army mess hall I ever ate in seem positively appetizing by comparison. They even make White Castle seem appetizing.

      --
      We call it art because we have names for the things we understand.
    3. Re:3 letters: MRE by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
      2500 calories per MRE? I have a "Chunky Beef Stew and Components" in front of me, and it has 593 calories. Perhaps you mean that eating a day's worth of these things will provide 2500 cals?

      They're really not that bad - I take them on hunting trips and such.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    4. Re:3 letters: MRE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meals, Rejected by [starving] Etheopians.

    5. Re:3 letters: MRE by theSprocket · · Score: 1

      the best part is if you dump enough tobasco sause on something, it tastes just like tobasco. and we all know that tobasco tastes much better than what they were trying to make those MREs taste like.

      two words: Tuna Casarole Q.E.D

    6. Re:3 letters: MRE by theSprocket · · Score: 1

      OOps, i forgot to mention... i always hated the randomness of the inclusion of the side items, it was like winning the lottery to get the tube of cheese like goo instead of the peanut butter or even worse, the jelly

    7. Re:3 letters: MRE by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1
      MRE = Meal, Ready to Eat

      Slightly offtopic, but I've been told that it REALLY stands for "Meal Refusing to Evacuate"...

    8. Re:3 letters: MRE by NavySpy · · Score: 1

      Only 593? That seems very low. But I guess I am misinformed.

  273. That's not a bug ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A customer complained about a bug.

    The boss said: "That's not a bug, that's a feature."

  274. Re:Licence? since when? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
    Use of external code to modify databases created by our program is prohibited.

    What kind of complete moron would sign a license agreement with that line in it? That means you have to use that company's product forever. Actaully, technically speaking, you can't even upgrade the program without a special waiver.

    I hope whoever signed that deal got shoved out the door so fast they got two week's pay instead of two weeks notice.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  275. Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm posting this anonymous for a good reason - I know people who have been fired for even hinting at this stuff publically.

    I work for the largest ISP in New Zealand - we are strongly associated with the largest Telco (who have a virtual monopoly on landlines)

    We have been told to outright lie to customers relating to a number of issues, including

    * Dropping port speeds to virtually 0 on a number of P2P applications
    * Running out of IP addresses to give to paying DSL customers
    * DSL network outages due to extremely poor design - we are not allowed to confirm these until "the word" comes through - even when half the country is without service.

    We have to tell these lies every day - I don't think it will suprise anyone to know that Xtra (the ISP) has a content partnership with MSN.

    The worst part is - half this stuff gets out in press-releases before we even get told at the helpdesk; and we're still meant to lie to customers even when the info is public!

    Despicable if you ask me - I'm leaving as soon as I can.

    1. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by judd · · Score: 2

      People who might like to hear from you:

      - Bruce at aardvark.co.nz
      - Anyone at Computerworld NZ
      - Anyone at NetGuide
      - TelstraClear ;-)

      Seriously, if you are correct, this amounts to fraud, and paying customers deserve to know. If you can rat them out anonymously in the NZ press, you should.

    2. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2
      Don't worry -- this post had been noticed by Aardvark ;-)

      Looks like there'll be another DSL story to go with the long list of others including: Telecom's Shocking DSL Admission.

    3. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      We have been told to outright lie to customers relating to a number of issues, including

      * DSL network outages due to extremely poor design - we are not allowed to confirm these until "the word" comes through - even when half the country is without service.

      Sounds like a good portion of the broadband providers here in the states. I got used to the nice uptime/downtime notices provided by my university. Then, I graduated... My DSL provider has a page customers can check for various downtimes (mail, network, etc), but most of the actual (not pre-planned) outages mysteriously never make it there.

    4. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for Xtra about four years ago, about the time that the helpdesk staff were split off and sold to a different company. From my experience, the helpdesk from then on had very little knowledge of what was actually happening in the company, as they were (are?) across town, tend to be untechnical and uninformed.

      To take issue with two of your specific examples;

      -I used to handle IP allocations from Netblocks assigned directly to Xtra by APNIC. As a large ISP owned by the ex-monopoly Telco, APNIC was always willing to give Xtra addresses and in fact wanted us to handle all of the allocations for the other ISP's in the country as well. I would be very surprised if this has changed.

      -Xtra had the best entwork infrastructure I have ever seen, and I've been working in Europe and the U.S. in the four years since, on a couple of occaisons for large ISP's. Much of the Xtra network was designed and implemented by a 22 year old "JB", who is now one of the most senior network engineers at Lucent in San Fran. Anyone who knows him and his work or is involved with Xtra on a technical level knows that the network design is as good as it gets.

      Hint: Working on the helpdesk must be frustrating, but everyone who calls the helpdesk likes the operator to talk about things that they know and understand.

    5. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by kinko · · Score: 1

      You missed his point re IP addresses. Xtra tells DSL customers that JetStart (the budget DSL) has to use dynamic IPs because they are running out of IPs. Of course, this is so that you have to pay more if you want a static IP. Telecom also forces other DSL providers to not provide static IPs on the JetStart service.

    6. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by spir0 · · Score: 1

      take into account that JB wasn't there when xtra was built, and it's been a few years since he left.

      in those years, a lot of things have changed. the helpdesk has been outsourced, adsl was introduced, among other things (I haven't worked there for many years too.. so there's bound to be more I don't know about...)

      but the infrastructure could have changed completely since JB was there.

      everyone has their own way of doing things, and that's not clearer than in the IT industry. someone would have disagreed with JB's ideas of a good network design.

      it's entirely likely that the infrastructure is now completely crap... but it's also possible that it's better than when JB was there.

      --
      The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
    7. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running out of IP's , thats rich.
      Can't have a static IP on Jetstart? (The 128K 'DSL') connection in NZ.
      The reason you can't have one is they dont want you running a server on it.

      But as usual, its not what you know its who you know...I personally know someone who has a static IP on Jetstart, because 'he knows someone'.

      New Zealanders learned a long time ago it does no good to complain about anything having to do with Telecom NZ or its ISP (Xtra). Wither it be to them OR the Government or the Commerce Commisson.

      The above mentioned Telco and all its holding are 'above the law' and will continue to be, and there isn't a durn thing we or you will be able to do about it.

      I feel your pain..

    8. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As an ex-Xtra worker, I can add something to this:

      1) The dropping of port speeds is now a well known issue, but this isn't just port blocking, its also combined with the sheer number of users taking up the bandwidth on Xtra Jetstart, which then results in the low speeds (especially o'seas connections).

      2) As far as I've seen, they're pretty quick to fix the "running out of IP addresses" issue. Of course it should never happen in the first place ...

      3) The DSL network outages are nothing to do with Xtra, they are purely Telecom issues. With exchange upgrades, firmware upgrades, phone line maintenance etc etc, there is no way you could expect Telecom to offer 100% service time.
      (They don't even OFFER 100% service ... bring on the 5 9's ;)

      However, Xtra does still have to "fob customers off" by referring them to Telecom, or back to their DSL modem vendors etc. The helpdesk technicians try .. they really do. They work in an unbelievably stressful environment, and get nothing but abuse from customers and poor wages for their time.

      The Xtra helpdesk takes literally thousands of calls a day (not even counting email communication). They are a production line created to churn through the calls as quickly, efficiently, and effectively as possible. Its a sad thing that complete open honesty to customers, and time to spend on calls with customers appear to have flown out the window.

      I was happy to leave the helpdesk, and was sad to see so many people having to stay there. I sincerely hope their working conditions improve dramatically in time to come!!

    9. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would there not be some sort of recourse legally on religious grounds if your employer is asking (telling) you to lie for them? As in, telling lies is a sin - I don't want to sin - if you don't follow the employers wishes however (ie, lie to the customer) you no longer have a job.

    10. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting

    11. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahah i was going to get fired from xtra for defamation .. :/ so i quit .. :)

      ... cryps .

    12. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jb..
      if you bump into him , ask him if hes still selling one4b...

      :]

    13. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for the competition - TelstraClear - and this really does make you want to scream. At T-C we at least have the decency to tell the customers the truth - especially when something serious like the authentication servers or mail servers fall over. Its hard to get 35 people singing the same tune when you want a release large lies.

      Something of this magnitude should be reported, perhaps to that wonderful guy on the TV Show "Target" (nz readers will know who im talking about).. Im sure he could list a dozen bad points in his magic RED PEN ;)

    14. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Skuzzlebutt74 · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward - can you contact me at this email address (anonymously of course...) scott@idg.co.nz Thanks

    15. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as yet another ex xtra worker i can back up these guys stories
      during the 18 months i worked there we were constantly forced to lie to customers
      xtras mail servers would go down all the time yet instead of being able top say " yes the servers are down we expect the problem to be resolved shortly " or even bullshit them with the old " yes the servers are currently being upgraded we expect them to be back online shortly" we were expected to lie and go through the customers settings even though the phones were going insane adding even more pressure on the already stressed out production line they call "the xtra helpdesk"
      as a previous poster noted the helpdesk is outsourced to a company that deals strictly with call centres their business ideal to be always maintain there is nothing wrong and process the customers like cattle much like their staff turn over haha
      thankfully i now work for another isp in newzealand where we are able to inform our customers of any issues this saves alot of time and most people are happy enough to be put in the picture
      people appreciate honesty
      xtra prides itself on a 100% customer satisfaction garrantee its justa pity that they claim this via lying to customers and chewing through staff members
      all the ex staff i talk to seem to have the same opinion

      yet another disgusted ex staff member

    16. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1

      Heh! I am familiar with one of the chief architects of the XTRA network, and have been using Jetstart since the week it was released in NZ. I had disconnect issues early in the service - esp when the Souther Cross cable came on line and only 20% of it was operational...

      I had huge arguments with tech staff (Not the phone desk people - the engineers) about the unforgiveable ping times ... which have since dropped to ALMOST acceptable levels...

      Over-all the Jetstart DSL service is outstanding. Awesome up time (Except for 3 weeks ago when ALL O3 and 04 phone line DSL customers were out for most of a week...

      Great bandwidth (Esp when the port breaks and delivers 760KB/s! :) ) which easily reaches 90-100% of capacity of 128 Kb/s - so no complaints there!

      The IP issue has been long since resolved, and I have not failed to be assigned an IP for months. Of more interest to me is people wanting static IPs! Why would you want one? A hacker's wet dream come true! And an ISPs nightmare, as every DSL customer sets up a web server or a game server... so I totally understand the dynamic IP issue.

      My major gripe is not with Xtra, but with TELECOM - because those bastards have placed the maximum permissable Interleaving on ALL DSL connections in New Zealand. They use 24ms + 24ms for a combined total of 48ms to your first hop! This is ostensibly to keep your connection alive and prevent modem retraining from noisey lines disco'ing you... BUT... the simple fact of the matter is that 90% of DSL phone lines have very low noise levels and could EASILY be dropped to 3ms + 6ms for a 9ms first hop.

      I know of SEVERAL Xtra personnel who have had interleaving COMPLETELY removed at the exchange, so their first hop really is 0ms!! Telecom would probably fire the persons responsible at the exchange, and get very very jumpy indeed when you start discussing this issue with their tech people.

      Their official stance is that the Interleaving policy is for reliability, but in fact that is bullshit, they are just too lazy to reduce it and offer decent pings, and it permits them to offer DSL to customers who would NOT be able to maintain a DSL connection because of distance to the exchange.

      To my mind, it's completely reprehensible to offer a premier broadband connection, and then cripple it with 10 times the first hop latency that should be available.

      I have no beef with Xtra at all, and consider them to be a fine ISP. I've been a customer of there's since 1995, but I will leave like a shot as soon as Cable is available to me. AFAIK cable connects in NZ suffer no interleaving or buffering of any kind. First hops of under 4ms and pings to the USA on the order of 160 ms in California - the same as the E1 (T1) line here at work. *sigh*

      --
      How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
    17. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by scarymunsta · · Score: 1

      Dude, you need to talk to my uncle Geoff Palmer from PC World. Email me at scarymunstaNOSPAM@paradise.net.nz and i'll give you his address, he is the one who put up a fight against telecoms 0867 numbers.

      take out the no spam from my email first ;)

    18. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too, like almost everyone who has posted on this thread have been dissapointed in XTRA's service of late. Though I only run a 56, I've noticed my connection speed slowing down dramatically. XTRA has had several standard excuses for this. I know that they are standard because I have talked to others who work on the helpdesk (whom I will not mention for obvious reasons).
      They tell me its the phone noise, or the double adapter, or the extension cord. It's none of that, I had a line test and there is virtually NO line noise.
      So can anyone explain to me why I would be getting a maximum of 33kpbs connection? XTRA certainly can't provide a valid answer, and have gone out of their way to aviod giving one.
      If you don't believe me then call them and tell them you've got a slow connection, they will tell you the exact excuses that I have mentioned above.
      I appreciate that XTRA has a very large client base, but could they not at least be honest and say hey look, we dont have the resources for the number of customers we have, we have had to scale down the individual bandwidth allocation?
      Come on XTRA, have some dignity and you'll earn the respect of the New Zealand public. If not then you are likely to loose a large number of customers when some competition manages to get onto the market...

    19. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I posted the reply above, I would just like to mention that XTRAS service is not all bad, they do have some good points, and I did not intend to harm the reputation of XTRA in any way, the intent was to outline a few faults I have seen and hoped they could be rectified in the near future, afterall improvement is the true key to growth!

  276. Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We do Linux

  277. More true than you'll ever know... by scubacuda · · Score: 1
    They stay together because if you can single them out, it's easy to dominate someone as weak-spined as a sales rep. Grouping together for protection, to maintain their small, filthy place in life.

    I've worked in several different sales environments and have always found that to be the case.

    I look at it this way. If you really want to know the truth about something, why not go to the engineer, developer, etc. who is working on it? Too often these sales asswads get their information from each other. I see it all the time: one rep starts a rumor, the others tell it, it gets back to the rep who started it, then the originator QUOTES the others when he retells it again.
  278. SmartCertify (a division of FFT) by Niet3sche · · Score: 1

    (on thier web page, too): "Take our exam package (Cisco, Microsoft, A+, etc.), and if you fail twice within 90 days of buying our $1500 package, then we'll refund your money." Yeah. Well, I've just settled with the bank 2 years later (after calling and calling FFT) for a $1200 settlement. Seems kinda shady to me.

  279. Well gimminy gee! by BadThoughts · · Score: 1

    it's so easy to use... NO WONDER IT'S #1!!!

  280. The difference between bag phones and flip phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to have a cellular phone that was international-capable.

    The deal was done. I tried to call. No go.

    I went back to complain. This phone doesn't call international.

    "That's because it doesn't have enough watts. You need the 5-watt bag phone to be able to call international."

  281. Consumer Products by redfenix · · Score: 1

    "Some Assembly Required"

    I'm growing to hate those words...

    --
    "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
  282. Motorola "digital" cable box by clmensch · · Score: 2, Informative

    My "digital" cable service (RCN of Manhattan) uses a crappy Motorola cable box that sports a "Dolby Digital" logo on the front...but only provides analog audio and composite video outputs. That should be illegal!

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
  283. Re: Guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people! pewter-balls are PEOPLE!!!!! arrrrrrgh!

  284. Re:Good point.... by ChaseTec · · Score: 1

    >>Unless they're one of the clued in types, they'll fall for the larger number

    I heard a Fry's electronics sales guy this weekend "clueing" in some customers that were looking at some iMacs. He said you had to multiple the Mhz by 2.5 on the Mac side to compare it to Athlons :)

    --
    My Hello World is 512 bytes. But it's also a valid Fat12 boot sector, Fat12 file reader, and Pmode routine.
  285. "It'd be better if I talked to your boss directly" by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 2
    I'd say the most blatant lie I've been told (by several salesman) is a form of
    It would be better if I discussed these matters directly with your boss.
    Considering that I thought that an essential part of my job was to never let the boss alone with a sales rep, my response was invariably, "better for whom?".

    As a runner up, I guess I'd list, "You can't move into the 21st century without video conferencing".

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  286. CompUSA said it was EIII compliant! by mekkab · · Score: 1

    So I go to buy a printer cable for my wife's laptop, and this guy INSISTS that this more expensive cable is indeed, E triple I compiant.

    being a lapsed member of the IEEE, I laughed. Out loud.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:CompUSA said it was EIII compliant! by JLester · · Score: 1

      I don't know how it is now, but when the bidirectional printers came out, they wouldn't work on the cheap parallel cables. You had to buy the IEEE cables for the printers to work properly. I didn't believe it either until I swapped a couple that fixed the printing problems the user was having.

      Jason

      --
      "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
    2. Re:CompUSA said it was EIII compliant! by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      You can still get cheap bidirectional printer cables that don't conform to the IEEE spec. They cost about a third as much. I went with a client to Best Buy to advise him about which computer to buy. This guy had tons of cash and ended up spending about $3,000 but all on stuff he wanted (top of the line cpu, nice monitor, printer, scanner, etc.)

      The salesman insisted we buy the IEEE cable which cost about $50. I asked, "What is the difference?" and he said, "Speed". I opted for the cheaper one for about $12.95. That seemed to piss him off a little.

      I had to refuse the "extended service warranty" (only $300!) *six* times. Finally I said, "Jesus, write it down and I'll sign it in blood! No extended warranty!"

      As we proceeded to checkout, they said, "Since you didn't take the warranty we have to open the box and verify that all the parts are included." I watched as the salesman opened the PC box and removed everything inside and then replaced it. I still don't know the point of that little exercise. After he was done I said, "Was everything there?" and he said, "Yes." I said, "Good, because that was Compaq factory tape sealing the box and if anything is missing now it is your ass, not theirs."

      God I hate Best Buy.

    3. Re:CompUSA said it was EIII compliant! by mekkab · · Score: 1

      wait, wait, I got the cable, that's not the issue.

      He said E triple I. THAT'S whats funny/ a bogus claim!

      man, you geeks. Always taking what I say waaaaay to literally. Always demanding a modicum of precision in what I mean. Next time I'll draw a map.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  287. Re:Good point.... by Bobartig · · Score: 1

    They sell macs at Fry's? And further, the sales guy was trying to sell one? Ye Flipping Gods! Whats the world coming to?

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  288. Re:Good point.... by darkonc · · Score: 1
    Well, saying "RISC chip without any" registers would have been patently untrue.

    For a nice instruction & register set for an 8 bit processor, the 6809 is still my runaway favorite.

    The 68000 seemed like a cross between the 360 and the VAX -- another nice, clean processor with a good set of addressing modes.
    Accordingo to a friend of a friend, Motorola lost the processor war when they instituted mandatory drug testing among their employees... By the time the recognized the stupidity of that move, they'd lost a number of really good processor designers.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  289. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by Animats · · Score: 2

    Actually, I have to agree. Win2K with the latest service packs isn't bad. Stability is good, setup isn't too hard, and it doesn't have all the user-hostile crap that comes with XP. It's better than NT 4, and almost as stable as NT 3.51 SP5.

  290. Re:CNET News - Text Grabs for lazy folks (LONG) by Bobartig · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to add that I'm terribly disturbed that C|net is more of a M$ pawn than I thought.

    Story 1:

    Microsoft exec: Bundling only a benefit

    By Bloomberg News
    Special to CNET News.com
    February 1, 1999, 6:05 PM PT

    update WASHINGTON--Microsoft's Windows 98 operating system in many regards doesn't offer consumers more benefits than they could get by installing the company's Internet Explorer Web browser on an earlier version of Windows, said Microsoft senior executive James Allchin.

    That testimony in the company's antitrust trial goes to the heart of one of Microsoft's main lines of defense: That the company put a Web browser in Windows 98 to benefit consumers, not squelch competition from rival browsers.

    Under relentless cross-examination by the government's lead attorney, David Boies, Allchin acknowledged that Windows 98 gave consumers roughly the same capabilities they would get from separately installing Internet Explorer into an older version of Windows.

    Boies grilled Allchin using the same videotaped presentation that Microsoft attorneys presented in court to detail the benefits of Windows 98.

    Nineteen times, Boies played a clip from the tape and asked Allchin about Windows 98's purported benefits. He asked Allchin, "If you took a Windows 95 machine without any Internet Explorer technologies and added a browser that you got off the Internet, you'd get the same rich experience you got here?"

    Allchin, whose answers became less and less audible, responded, "Yes, I believe that's correct."

    The second Microsoft executive to take the stand at the company's antitrust trial under way here added that when Internet Explorer is installed separately on an operating system, it "replaces core files" in Windows that enable the browser to run in much the same way Windows 98's Web browsing function does.

    "It doesn't matter where [consumers] get the software," Allchin testified, referring to Internet Explorer.

    Boies shot back, "Within Microsoft, it mattered a great deal because if [consumers] got [Internet Explorer] one way it represented a competitive choice, and if they got it another way the consumer had to take it, right?"

    Allchin agreed with the assertion after Boies showed him a copy of an email the executive sent in December 1995 that discussed Microsoft needing to "leverage Windows more" to gain share in the Internet browser market.

    Critical exchange
    Today's courtroom exchange is critical to the case against Microsoft brought by the Justice Department and 19 states, which allege the company used illegal tactics to protect its Windows monopoly from competitive threats posed by emerging Internet technologies. The government alleges Microsoft realized Internet browsers could become alternate computer operating systems.

    The company responded by "welding" Internet Explorer to Windows to ensure a dedicated distribution method with the majority of computer users. Windows runs on more than 90 percent of the world's personal computers.

    Company officials frequently cite, as they did today, language in a June 1998 appeals court decision in a related dispute that said the company is free to integrate new products into Windows as long as some consumer benefit results. That language was not central to the appeals court's decision.

    Speaking outside the courthouse after the trial adjourned today, Microsoft spokesman Mark Murray dodged a question about the benefits Windows 98 has that consumers couldn't get by installing Microsoft's browser separately.

    Instead, emphasizing the appellate court ruling, he said, "The government's case is really about trying to dictate product design...which would set back the growth of the high-tech sector in our economy."

    Boies' questioning of Allchin today was intended to support the government's claim that there is no reason for Microsoft to link the two products except to illegally maintain its Windows monopoly. To support this charge, Boies cited pretrial testimony by Microsoft executive Ben Slivka, who answered "yes" when asked if integrating the browser into Windows was a response to the threat posed by Internet browsers.

    Boies read this part of Slivka's deposition to Allchin, asking him if he agreed. Allchin answered: "Yes," saying that Microsoft "believed Netscape was a serious potential platform threat" to Windows.

    Last week, Microsoft senior executive Paul Maritz testified that the software giant had asked Netscape not to compete against it in the Internet browser market in an attempt to have Netscape instead build products that worked with Windows.

    Roll the video
    Microsoft provided the ammunition for Boies' attack by introducing into evidence almost three hours of videotaped presentations. That video was intended to prop up Allchin's direct testimony about why it was important include Internet browsing technologies in Windows 98, which went on sale last June.

    One segment featured Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates at a 1995 conference explaining to software developers how Microsoft planned to make it easier to access information on the Internet by "reducing the number of steps the user has to learn." The company planned to "set standards" for configuring Web sites to help Internet users find information, he said.

    Another video purported to show the ease with which computer users could "seamlessly" move from accessing files within their personal computers to information on the Internet. Microsoft employee David Fester showed that such features were unavailable when Navigator was loaded onto a Windows 95-based personal computer.

    Boies called the comparison irrelevant. "This is not a trial about whether Navigator is better than [Internet Explorer] or whether [Internet Explorer] is better than Navigator," he told reporters. "This is a trial about whether consumers ought to have a free choice" between Web browsers, he said, noting later that Allchin's testimony showed that Microsoft had "no technological justification for what was done."

    At the close of the day's proceedings, Microsoft attorney John Warden asked U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson to "nullify" an earlier order barring the attorneys from talking to their witnesses outside the courtroom. Jackson turned Warden down.

    Shares of Microsoft fell 2.0625 to close at 172.9375.

    Story 2:

    Chase admits another tape fudge

    By Bloomberg News
    Special to CNET News.com
    February 16, 1999, 11:00 AM PT

    Microsoft Vice President Brad Chase acknowledged that computer users could spend more time downloading a rival's Web browser than was depicted in a videotape the software giant had played at its antitrust trial.

    The company's videotaped demonstration, which Microsoft played last week, showed that rival Netscape's Navigator Web browser could be downloaded from America Online in several easy steps.

    Today, Chase acknowledged that a counter demonstration video prepared by the U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) accurately portrayed a more complicated download process that took between 30 minutes and an hour. Chase also conceded that the Microsoft video skipped over several steps in the procedure that computer users had to follow to download Navigator, including opening a folder to find the browser once the process was completed.

    "One of the things you skipped was opening up this folder?" asked David Boies, the government's chief trial lawyer.

    "That's correct," Chase said.

    The government's video "accurately describes what it purports to describe?" Boies asked.

    "It accurately shows the setup process, yes," Chase said.

    The issue is important because it marked the third time that the government had successfully challenged a videotape demonstration by Microsoft. In two earlier episodes, Microsoft was forced to concede flaws in their demonstrations. In one instance, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, said he was troubled by flaws in the presentation that raised questions about the reliability of the entire demonstration.

    Chase today also apologized for inaccurately stating last week that the Netscape Navigator icon would appear on the computer user's desktop screen after the download was completed. In fact, users must click to a folder to find the icon, then move the icon to the desktop.

    "I was incorrect, I apologize for that," Chase said, adding that most AOL users who download software from the Internet understand they have to go to the folder.

    Microsoft had played its latest videotape in an attempt to show that downloading the Navigator browser was so easy that Netscape could easily distribute its rival product to users over the Internet. The video is intended to counter accusations Microsoft stifled competition from Netscape by making it harder for its rival to distribute its browser.

    The government has presented evidence that Microsoft restricted how computer manufacturers and Internet service providers could promote Netscape. Microsoft argues the contracts that required distribution of its Internet Explorer Web browser were standard cross-promotional agreements that did not foreclose Netscape's ability to distribute Navigator.

    Government uses Chase's email
    Boies also showed Chase a November, 17, 1997 email the Microsoft vice president had written stating that Internet Explorer "has become too big to download" and the "set-up process is too hard for user to figure out."

    The email also stated that "only a little more than half of the people" that download one application from Microsoft's Web site "end up installing the browser."

    The government is trying to show that Microsoft understood that downloading large software programs like Web browsers was a difficult procedure. That would make it difficult for Netscape to distribute Navigator through installation on computers and would foreclose a key means of getting a product to customers.

    Chase said the email contained overblown rhetoric. "It's sort of part of our culture to take strong, extreme positions in order to push people to get their attention." Besides, more up-to-date market figures showed that a much larger percentage of computer users ended up downloading the browsing software, he said.

    Copyright 1999, Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved.

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  291. Re: Guns by Darkninja666 · · Score: 1

    Well if you don't believe People are the ones that kill, (know from experience I have used guns for a long while and YET I have to have killed someone).
    Then I guess you believe that Windows has the majority of the market because IT IS A BETTER PRODUCT THEN LINUX/UNIX??? Think about it............

    --
    Secure multi-mediation is the future of all webbing...
  292. Re:Good point.... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    I always wondered if that kind of thing ever happened. I'm glad to see it does...

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  293. "Your call is important to us!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    biggest lie...

  294. Caldera by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    Caldera at Networld+Interop in 1997 telling someone that Linux runs on a 286 because the guy was going on and on about his old 286.

    I even butted in to correct him and he insisted that it ran on a 286.

    I decided not to go into the details of the boot.s file, and how it sets up all the protected mode stuff for the 386.

    1. Re:Caldera by technos · · Score: 2

      Linux does run on a 286. It'll run not only on the 286, but on the 186, the 8088 *and* the 8086.

      Caldera's distribution, alas, would not.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    2. Re:Caldera by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Not the stock kernel. Sure - there have been ports to the older stuff, but as you said, that is not what the guy was trying to say. He was standing there with a Caldera CD proposing it did.

  295. Bill gates ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    .. telling 640k would be enough for everybody ...

    uhm no, it's not a lie .. it's a feature!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  296. read in Byte Magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interview by Bill Gates.
    DOS 3.0 would be UNIX like and multitasking

  297. Intuit workers make our stuff by morcheeba · · Score: 2

    True story: We had a, uh, enthuiastiac vice president. He was helping lead a tour of VIPs, including some government representative (senate or congress) from Alaska. The group went through the machine shop in the basement and the VP told him that all the guys in drafting do is hit a button, and presto, the machines pop out the parts. Never mind all those people standing around who actually interpret the drawings, and break it down into programs for the machines.

    Then, when our VP found out that the VIP was from Alaska, he said something like "as a matter of fact, most of the manufacturing of our satellite parts is done by Intuit indians," and that "they were very reliable and good with their hands". Mind you that we were located just outside of Washington, DC, quite away from Alaska. And had no ties to Alaska. Another VP quickly changed the subject.

    Luckily, I left before that company...

    1. Re:Intuit workers make our stuff by DCMonkey · · Score: 1

      And here I thought you were going to make some kind of Quicken reference.

      --
      DCMonkey
    2. Re:Intuit workers make our stuff by kindbud · · Score: 2

      Never mind that Intuit is the name of a software company, not a tribe of Eskimos...(perhaps Inuit was the name you were thinking of, or did your VIP make a double-gaffe?).

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    3. Re:Intuit workers make our stuff by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Whoops. Thanks, my gaffe. My brain was thinking one thing; my fingers another.

  298. Biggest lie ever: by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2

    "Microsoft must be free to innovate"

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Biggest lie ever: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because if they're free to innovate, Linux doesn't stand a chance. Thanks.

  299. Largest lie. by RageMachine · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is more secure than Linux.

    (Looked like Slackware & BSD really won)

    --

    --------------------------
    Is this a sig?
    --------------------------
  300. Re:Licence? since when? by oo7tushar · · Score: 2

    or you just don't follow the licence agreement and don't tell them about it...ignorance is bliss =)
    it's also great when you're just going to make your own version of the product

  301. Pinnacle Micro by 3vi1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember many many years ago, when I was buying my first CD recorder, Pinnacle Micro had just come out with the double-speed RCD-1000.

    Back then, systems were meager and expensive. I wanted to connect it to a PS/2 (yeah, one of those boat anchors) via the Adaptec microchannel SCSI card.

    Suspicious that the setup might not work, I spoke directly with one of PM's salemen. They were eager to talk, cause the drives were $2000 at the time and blank disks ran $25 from them and about half that from other vendors).

    The salesman not only told me that the Adaptec SCSI card was certified to work with the drive, but offered to sell it to me as part of the bundle (with 100% markup on the cost of the card - $400).

    After a month of troubleshooting, the umpteenth tech I spoke to on their support line (not an 800 number, and always a 45 to 60 minute wait on hold before they got to my call) told me that "It's the SCSI card - that particular one won't work with the drive". Then, he did some 'research' and told me of a BusLogic microchannel card that would work.

    So I bought the BusLogic card.

    The thing was still a $2000 coaster making toaster.

    So, over the course of 12 more tech support calls (each with an hour on hold), I finally get escalated up to their head techie, who informs me "That drive doesn't work with any microchannel SCSI card! I don't know where you got the idea it would...." I gave him the names of the salesman who specified the Adaptec card and the tech who specified the BusLogic.

    I finally got the drive working by saving up for many months and buying another (non-microchannel) system ($2500+ more down the drain) to use with the RCD-1000.

    8 months later, the RCD-1000 burnt itself up, and PM wanted to charge me $460 to fix it. They said it was *just* out of warranty. Nevermind the months and months of downtime I had because they had outright lied to me.

    THAT is the reason I will never, ever, again buy or recommend any of their products.

  302. The "Coke Test" by herbierobinson · · Score: 5, Funny

    A long time ago, I interviewed with a company that made electronic cash registers. We were chatting at the end of the interview and I mentioned my best computer salesmen story. Well, they one-upped me with this:

    The salesman had taken one of the few prototypes they had to a demo at a large hotel chain. The demo is going well and then one of the hotel people asks the question, "Will it pass the Coke test?". The salesman doesn't have a clue what the Coke test is, but in true salesman form, he answers "Yes." The hotel buyer proceeds to pick up a can of Coke, pop the tab and dump it down the keyboard of the very expensive prototype... Needless to say, that prototype never worked again. The real amazing part of the story is that the Hotel bought a lot of them -- with the newly designed rubber matt over the keyboard... I gather that particular salesman never made up answers to questions after that, too...

    --
    An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
  303. Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Advertised "250 watt" computer speakers which weigh three pounds and are powered off a 9V 300mA AC adapter.

    P = E x I, where P is power in watts, E is electromotive force in volts, and I is current in amperes.

    1 amp = 1000mA. You do the math.

    A real 200 watt power amplifier will generally have a power supply with a transformer which weighs at least 50 pounds, and that's *per channel*.

    And they use the term "PMPO" - "Peak Music Power Output". Fine, putting aside the fact that this term has no accepted definition in electrical engineering - let's say that those little Taiwanese-made speakers contain an amplifier with a big bank of capacitors to dump out enough current to achieve 250 watts peak. If the power supply to them is only 9V, the capacitors would never get above 9V. If the speakers themselves have a standard nominal impedance of 8 ohms, then we can calculate.

    A simple application of Ohm's Law reveals that 9V into 8 ohms could yield a maximum current of (I = E/R) 1.125 amps. 1.125 amps at 9 volts shows 10.125 watts absolute peak. And in real world situations, we must include the on-state resistance of all the transistors in the output stages.

    10.125W < 250W. Therefore, they are lying. By a factor of almost 25.

    Wattage ratings tend to be utter lies with any consumer electronics, especially car audio equipment and boom boxes. The absolute worst come from tiny little Chinese sweatshops making brands of computer speakers that no one has ever heard of.

    My computer's sound system includes a pair of Acoustic Research AR-4x bookshelf speakers driven off a highly modified Sound A-5000 power amplifier. B+ to the output stages is 45V DC derived from a 10 pound power supply transformer, and it does produce a solid and stable 25W RMS per channel into 8 ohms, using a 1kHz sinewave driving a resistive load. And that's the accepted standard for wattage ratings of real power amplifiers.

    As a former professional sound technician who has done lead sound for Garth Brooks, Harry Belafonte, and The Three Tenors at such prestigious venues at the SkyDome, I've frequently used 240 watt power amplifiers from companies like ElectroVoice, Crown and QSC to power stage monitors on 5000 square foot stages. I speak from experience that running some of this stuff in your house will make your nose bleed. You're not gonna tell me with inflated numbers that a set of $19.95 at Fry's computer speakers will do the same thing.

    There's no shame in admitting that a given computer speaker system has a rating of 1W RMS per channel, but idiot consumers just buy the biggest number they can find. In reality, it takes four times the power to double the volume.

    Jeez, it's almost as bad as the horsepower ratings on new cars...

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      As a former professional sound technician who has done lead sound for Garth Brooks


      You've got a lot to answer for motherfucker

    2. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Aragorn379 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And they use the term "PMPO" - "Peak Music Power Output". Fine, putting aside the fact that this term has no accepted definition in electrical engineering - let's say that those little Taiwanese-made speakers contain an amplifier with a big bank of capacitors to dump out enough current to achieve 250 watts peak. If the power supply to them is only 9V, the capacitors would never get above 9V. If the speakers themselves have a standard nominal impedance of 8 ohms, then we can calculate

      Not to say they aren't lying, they are, but capacitors can be charged to a higher voltage than the source using a voltage doubler circuit or a flyback voltage multiplier. Doesn't give you any more power but does trade current for voltage. See this page for some example circuits.

    3. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by slashnik · · Score: 1
      Sure Peak Music Power has no accepted definition but I think that it is generally accepted in the LoFi world to be the power derived from Peak to Peak measurement of the voltage and then multiplied by the number of channels.


      slashnik

    4. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always thought of the wattage ratings as the total consumed power... That is including transformer loss!

      If you think of it that way they aren't exactly lying, just not telling you anything useful about the product.

    5. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by nathanh · · Score: 3, Informative
      If the power supply to them is only 9V, the capacitors would never get above 9V.

      Two mistakes here. First, you said it was a 9V AC adaptor so the DC peak is ~13V. Second, a voltage doubler before the rectifier is entirely possible.

      A simple application of Ohm's Law reveals that 9V into 8 ohms

      It's not quite this simple with dynamic components (inductors/capacitors/coils). That's why speakers have 8 ohms impedance, not 8 ohms resistance.

      1.125 amps at 9 volts shows 10.125 watts absolute peak.

      There's no need to go to all this effort. You already said the AC adaptor is 300mA at 9V. Sustainable power is therefore approximately 3W. Peak power is an unknown because the internal circuitry could easily store enough energy to give 100s of watts of power, even if only for a short time. Without opening the speaker boxes you can't make any judgement.

    6. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have just received a suggestion which would allow these speakers to output significantly more than 250W albeit for a short period. Just set fire to them! Does this count?

    7. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he meant "lead sound" like "lead balloon".

      .

    8. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Not to say they aren't lying, they are, but capacitors can be charged to a higher voltage than the source using a voltage doubler circuit or a flyback voltage multiplier. Doesn't give you any more power but does trade current for voltage. See this page for some example circuits.

      Of course they could. Or they could use an 18V 150mA AC adapter instead of a 9V 300mA AC adapter - which, it would strike me, would be a lot cheaper than adding to the parts count.

      The only time DC-DC converter circuits are used in amps is car stereo amplifiers, where the power supply is DC and limited to 13.8V, which really can't offer you more than 20W into 4 ohms. (4 ohm speakers were initially brought into use as car stereo systems evolved from utilitarian car radios.)

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    9. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      I've always thought of the wattage ratings as the total consumed power... That is including transformer loss!
      If you think of it that way they aren't exactly lying, just not telling you anything useful about the product.

      Sure they are. Power into the speakers is 9VDC @ 300mA from the AC adapter. 2.7 watts output from the adapter. Now, a modern transformer, even the one in a crappy wall-wart, is gonna be at least 90% efficient. Meaning that, no matter how you slice it, the speakers aren't drawing more than 3.5W on the *very* outside from the power line. How does that make them 250W speakers?

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    10. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure they can achieve that power output,but only when on fire.........

    11. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by KyleJ61782 · · Score: 1

      The problem with your reasoning, though, is that when an AC signal is passed through the circuit, impedance appears to be resistance anyways, so your argument is moot. However, it is true, if there are no inductors in the circuit, only capacitors (which I'd have an incredibly hard time believing), then you'd have to obtain a really, really high frequency to decrease impedence low enough to allow a discharge of the capacitors high enough to produce a 250W spike. The possibility of something like that happening within the innards of those speakers is for all intents and purposes impossible.

      --

      I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
    12. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Crixus · · Score: 2

      What does "done lead sound for Garth Brooks" mean? Are you a FOH engineer? Did you design the front end or monitor mix? What? Rich...

      --
      Ignore Alien Orders
    13. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by UncleFluffy · · Score: 1

      Actually, most car systems use a double-ended, or "bridged" amplifier which wiggles both ends of the speaker coil, giving you (as power = V^2/R):

      ((13.8*2)^2) / 4 = 190Wish

      without any DC-DC conversion needed.

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

    14. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Tiroth · · Score: 1

      It all depends on the crossovers; some (poor) designs can have extremely low reactance at 200kHz+, which can hose amps that are prone to oscillations at such freqencies.

      The voice coils are inductors; there is no real way to eliminate all inductance from a traditional loudspeaker. Planar/ribbon transducers and electrostatics are another thing entirely.

    15. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by linuxcoder · · Score: 1

      Did it say the speakers are 250W or the amp is rated at 250W? It's all about marketing. Tell a kid you have 500W speakers in your car and he will be impressed. Just don't tell him you are driving it with a 10W amp.

    16. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Two mistakes here.

      Nope.

      First, you said it was a 9V AC adaptor so the DC peak is ~13V.

      In North America, the accepted definition of the term "AC adapter" is a plug-mounted power supply which outputs a low AC or DC voltage. The reference to AC refers to the fact that it plugs into AC. If you're unclear about the common usage of the English language in this regard, you can see it in context merely by typing "ac adapter" into Yahoo's search field.

      Second, a voltage doubler before the rectifier is entirely possible.

      At least two diodes and at least two electrolytic capacitors. Why not just buy different rating AC adapters at the same price?

      It doesn't have a voltage doubler in it, and neither you or I needs to open it to prove it. Doing so would be only marginally more ridiculous than looking for a flyback transformer in an AM radio.

      It's not quite this simple with dynamic components (inductors/capacitors/coils). That's why speakers have 8 ohms impedance, not 8 ohms resistance.

      Of course not. Maybe you'd like to teach the new Slashdot course, "Differential Calculus for Electrical Engineering", if you think that my ballpark approach, which anyone with high school physics ought to handle, is too simplistic.

      There's no need to go to all this effort.

      Sure there is. I was trying to prove my point mathematically.

      You already said the AC adaptor is 300mA at 9V. Sustainable power is therefore approximately 3W. Peak power is an unknown because the internal circuitry could easily store enough energy to give 100s of watts of power, even if only for a short time.

      Sure. Like looking for a pulse generator and a stack of oil-filled capacitors in a transistor radio. I dunno how they build electronics down under, but around here, we don't add the complexity, cost or unreliability of adding components unnecessarily.

      Without opening the speaker boxes you can't make any judgement.

      Sure I can. It's got a pair of LM386 ICs, held on with dull-gray blobs of solder on a printed circuit board that looks like the layout was done by a Parkinsons patient's left hand. Components will be skewed on the board, held in place only by cold solder joints. You might find it's actually built of discrete parts; I don't know and I don't care - but I assure you that there won't even be anything as substantial as a TDA2002 in them, despite the 250W claim.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    17. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      The voice coils are inductors; there is no real way to eliminate all inductance from a traditional loudspeaker. Planar/ribbon transducers and electrostatics are another thing entirely.

      Oooh! Ionovac, that was so cool.

      It was a speaker which worked (somehow) on ionized air - no diaphragm mass, no inductance, etc... I'll have to dig through my old Popular Electronics magazines; it was on the cover once in the early 1960s and it was a concept I wanted to try.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    18. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      I have just received a suggestion which would allow these speakers to output significantly more than 250W albeit for a short period. Just set fire to them! Does this count?

      Well, since they state a peak MUSIC power output, they must be claiming that will be an energy emission in the form of sound. Light and heat do not count toward that total, I'm afraid.

      If we were to set fire to the people who propagate these lies, then we might achieve their claimed audio output power.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    19. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      What does "done lead sound for Garth Brooks" mean? Are you a FOH engineer? Did you design the front end or monitor mix? What?

      System design and co-ordination; technical crew chief for sound, in particular doing location liason with their guys. They brought enough sound to fill the field - it was up to me to fill the rest of the stadium.

      Garth - and many other big names - have their own guys travel with them to do the mix. They tend to be incredibly picky about having people they know doing stage monitors (for obvious reasons), so if there's any one place they won't trust the house staff or local road techs, it's there.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    20. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      Did it say the speakers are 250W or the amp is rated at 250W? It's all about marketing. Tell a kid you have 500W speakers in your car and he will be impressed. Just don't tell him you are driving it with a 10W amp.

      Feh. A real honest-to-goodness 10W amp is sufficient for inside any car.

      I keep on wanting to build sibilance projectors on the underside of my truck. Anytime some silly home-boy who doesn't know which way to wear a baseball cap pulls up beside me with the stereo going thumpa-thumpa-thumpa, I want to be able to flip a switch and drive a couple of hundred watts of bass-filtered Jimi Hendrix guitar solo right into a collection of piezoelectric tweeters pointed at his car.

      I'll have to get into the habit of keeping ear protection and aspirin in the truck.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    21. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even have to read the fine print to see that these are "250 Watts (P.M.P.O.)". What you want is "250 Watts RMS". Your own damn fault for not knowing shit about what you're buying.

    22. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Without opening the speaker boxes you can't make any judgement.

      Yes you can. They cost $4.00. How much circuitry could they possibly have, even if they are made in Taiwan.

    23. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by TheMeld · · Score: 1

      Yes, I suspect that they are probably lying, or have defined PMPO to be, say, 10x actual peak power output, but I still have a bone to pick with your argument.

      A simple application of Ohm's Law reveals that 9V into 8 ohms could yield a maximum current of (I = E/R) 1.125 amps.

      If I remember my intro EE stuff correctly, current sources in parallel add current linearly. So, if I have 25 of the capacitors you describe in parallel[1], then I can discharge them in parallel and get 28.125 amps, and 253.125 watts. Of course, you couldn't sustain this for long, and if you did, you'd almost certainly burn up bits of the PCB. But you can get more than 1.125 amps out of some caps charged to 9V.

      [1]: Yes, sufficiently ridiculous and space wasting that you'd not find it in cheapshit computer speakers, but I could solder it together in a few minutes and demonstrate it.

      --
      -Cheetah
    24. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Mordanthanus · · Score: 1

      I would be interested in seeing that article... When you find it, how about Slashdotting it??

      --
      User logging on... 300 baud... 300 BAUD?!? (Click!) NO CARRIER
    25. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Shanep · · Score: 2

      Dude, too much math.

      Just look at the power adaptor. 9V at 300mA. Thats 2.7W.

      Try to get 10W out of that plugpack and you're gonna melt it.

      I was tought, if I can remember correctly back 14 years, that PMPO was measured from the peak of the positive most point of the signal, to the peak of the most negative point of the signal.

      Whereas RMS is measured between the 0V cross over point to 0.707% of the peak of a sine wave signal.

      So a 20W RMS amp would be 56.6W PMPO? Which they'd probably advertise as 60W anyway.

      BTW, I agree with you wholeheartedly, Re: your general gist, etc. I hate P-bloody-MPO bullshit. My 30W RMS Sony mini Hi-Fi is *really* loud for me.

      Years ago, I wanted a Pioneer M91 power amp. Awesome specs and 200 Watt RMS per channel. As you say, it was heavy. : )

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    26. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Since heat is just a low level vibration of atoms, doesn't that just make it music at an unusual frequency?

    27. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      I would be interested in seeing that article... When you find it, how about Slashdotting it??

      Drop me a private e-mail and it will eventually appear in your IN box.

      The Ionovac was (and still is, I guess) the most theoretically pure tweeter ever designed. Hmmm... One of my Celestion (Ditton 44 Series 2) speakers has a mismatched tweeter...

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  304. Sounds like Pixelon by ptbrown · · Score: 1

    Ah... actually quite an inspiring story. They guy was a genius. Unfortunately, like many genuises, he was also insane.
    http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151, 16309,00.html

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
    1. Re:Sounds like Pixelon by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      I think (and it has been a long time) it was WebCast Pro - by Gallacticomm(?)

  305. Too many partitions by wizard97 · · Score: 1

    I remember when I buyed my first PC. The local computer salesman told me my lockups problems with Windows 95 where due to "Many harddrives at the same time". I have a 500Mb with two partitions, C: and D:.

    1. Re:Too many partitions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems obvious to me why the salesman thought you would believe anything.

  306. Re:Good point.... by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

    They sell Macs at Fry's here in Austin, and there are generally about as many, if not more sales droids hanging out in that area than around the assembled x86 boxes. Not that I'm terribly interested in either, but you pretty much have to walk down through that area in order to get to where some of the other stuff is.

  307. WindozeMe Is good by Daish · · Score: 1

    When I first bought Windoze(when all I knew was mac) a vendor told me "WindozeMe is just like Win98se only better and for 50 more dollars you can upgrade to it. Beat that.

  308. OOP by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    (* Microsoft touting "Zero Administration" when Windows NT 4.0 came out. My boss was like "we'll save so much!!! I can't even project the numbers!" *)

    Sounds like OOP and PHB's WRT "reuse", "simpler code", "less change impact", "less bugs", blah blah blah.

    oop.ismad.com

    (Yeah go ahead and mod me down as a "troll". You can mod me to -999 and OOP will *still* be evidence-free BS.)

    1. Re:OOP by demon · · Score: 1

      Amen. In school, several of my profs took their turns frothing over OOP (mostly as in C++, of course). Not that they ever provided any evidence that OOP was better - students still wrote code that was just as bad in C++ as they did in C, or VB, or any other language. (Of course, in Software Engineering, the prof talked about how wonderful MS's software development practices are too, and how great their "waterfall model" was, and all that crap.)

      I find Objective-C to be an interesting language, but OOP is IMO hardly the holy grail that it's rumored to be.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  309. Products that promise you to fly by felipeal · · Score: 2

    Like XP or Red Bull (Red Bull gives you wings).

  310. Dungeon Seige Claims... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is Dungeon Siege different from other RPGs?

    Dungeon Siege raises the action FRPG genre to the next level. First, the Siege Engine immerses the player in a gigantic, seamless 3D world, enabling the player to move effortlessly between interior and exterior environments without ever seeing a load screen. This provides a visual depth to the game-world never before seen in an fantasy RPG.


    What!?!? I can't recall the first time I have seen this, but I can tell you off the top of my head, Ultima 7 (published in 1991, looking at original box) did this, as with Ultima 6 if I recall correctly. Ok so its not 3D, Ultima 9 was, and it didn't have load screens.

    Next, the ability to control an entire party of 8 characters, instead of just one, elevates the excitement and challenges the player in new ways, covering the gamut of skills from fierce warrior to fearsome leader.

    Again, this was done in Ultima 7 as a quick example. I can't think of an example that in done in 3D, but the 8 characters thing has been done.

    Lastly, Dungeon Siege is focused on delivering intense, over-the-top combat. The character creation process allows players to jump into the game almost immediately, without having to learn a complex rule set. You make your decisions about your character's abilities real-time as you play, choosing whether to specialize in melee combat, archery or magic as the situation requires. There are even party and inventory management tools so you can stay focused on the action, instead of minutia.

    Again Ultima 7 did this. Oh Ultima how you were so advanced for your time... Its a shame that these are all marketing claims that Microsoft & Gas Powered Games haven't been looked into. No biggie, as I still have a masive stiffy for Dungeon Seige, but I just hate when a product is hyped up with blatent lies.

  311. Re:Good point.... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    Accordingo to a friend of a friend, Motorola lost the processor war when they instituted mandatory drug testing among their employees... By the time the recognized the stupidity of that move, they'd lost a number of really good processor designers.

    Maybe the managers were concerned about how the engineers were always discussing doping, and just got the wrong idea. Heh.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  312. Compaq Lies by ChrisKnight · · Score: 2

    In 1994 the company I worked for standardized on Compaq as their equipment vendor, with Novell as their server OS of choice. Our building had four Compaq Proliant servers. Over a six month period we replaced five motherboards in those four servers.

    Compaq was called into a meeting to justify our staying with them as our preferred vendor. The Compaq rep told us that we were the only customer having this problem.

    I told him to prove it, by tracking the serial numbers of a couple of motherboards for me and showing me their repair history. He said that Compaq did not keep track of that level of detail.

    I'm not sure which was the 'bigger lie', but neither was true.

    -Chris

    --
    -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
  313. From Road Runner Tech Support... by coene · · Score: 2, Funny

    [referring to a traceroute]

    "Anything under 1000 ms to your first hop is acceptable"

  314. Re:Cigarettes, offtopic? by El_Froggo · · Score: 1

    "While light, the article did prompt me to wonder what is the most outrageous lie ever told by a vendor?" Hrmm, how exactly is this offtopic? I don't see anything there a says "Tech Vendor" all I see is "vendor."

  315. Not a vendor, but still a lie. by Associate · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    For the people, of the people and by the people.

    --
    Someone hates these cans.
  316. They wouldn't do that... by bluprint · · Score: 1

    This is from their creed. That all men have inalienable rights to think freely, to talk freely, to write freely their own opinions and to counter or utter or write upon the opinions of others;

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
    1. Re:They wouldn't do that... by Sir+Tristam · · Score: 1
      This is from their creed. That all men have inalienable rights to think freely, to talk freely, to write freely their own opinions and to counter or utter or write upon the opinions of others;
      This might be in their creed, but they leave themselves a hole you could throw a cat spread-eagle through and not hit a side. As I understand their belief system, they could consistently argue that if you have not been cleared of body thetans (only possible through their methods), then you are not thinking, talking or writing freely. Instead, you are doing those under the influence of those thetans. A sure sign that you need their help!

      Chris Beckenbach

  317. Second hand stores, Second hand smoke, SVHS by zer0*ryok0 · · Score: 1

    off topic to subject, but not to parents:

    I thing one thing alot of people over look on the whole "they choose to do it" thing, is Second Hand Smoke. I dont choose to breath it, but it sure as hell is there ever time i walk into my local Publix food store and the workers are sitting on the benches i walk past with their hairnets on, smoking and exhaling before i pass.

    i swear to god i cough (atleast once) every time i get that nasty smell under my nose.

    --
    the only fact is that everything is an opinion
  318. Everything you require for $8 Mil by hydertech · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the SAP guys told our company it's gonna cost $8 Mil.

    Now 2 years later and $17 Mil into it and we could do better with a room full of homeless people with abacuses.

  319. "Our salesman may have lied" by rs79 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1985: a California graphics board manufacturer - I wrote firmware. The products actually shipped with a manual that said "This manual says what our product actually does, no matter what the salesman may have told you it does".

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  320. Oracle teams with Mafia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly, that's nothing compared to Oracle's recent strong arming of customers. Check this article out for a cynical perspective.

    www.valleyofthegeeks.com/News/OracleMafia.html

  321. Re:media quality makes a difference by bxbaser · · Score: 1

    A better produced blank media will kick the ass of a lesser produced blank,however the retail price isnt related to the quality
    Things like birefringence and reflectivity will definatly make a difference with the sound.
    Also burn speed makes (or used to back then,over years ago) a big difference
    When i was in the cd replication business i would test the burned media before i sent it to mastering and i could alway tell the ones recorded at over 1x speed they would usually have a huge bler rate.

  322. Re: Guns by Stitchley · · Score: 1

    I'll have you know that with a stove and a wire coat hanger, I have made toast. With a fire and a fork, I have made toast. With an oven, I have made toast. No matter how illegal you make toasters, toast will always be made.

  323. heh by PaxTech · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's answer to that would be "It's not an 'unrecoverable application error' because we don't call it that."

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    1. Re:heh by coolgeek · · Score: 1
      Along those lines...Pardon me if you've already heard this old one:

      Q. How many Microsoft engineers does it take to change a lightbulb?
      A. None. They just declare darkness to be the new standard.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
  324. Scientology by ajmarks · · Score: 0

    "We're a good religion."

    --
    Opinions are not Informative, though they may be Insightful or Interesting.
  325. Halo for the Mac? by Kranium · · Score: 1

    Any Mac people out there remember this one?:

    Bungie: "Sure, we're still gonna bring Halo to the Mac."

  326. Got to teach AMD some geography by XPulga · · Score: 2
    Me: Are you sure this cooler (a CoolerMaster) is enough for this 1.4 GHz Athlon you're selling me ?

    Salesman: Sure, here is AMD's cooler certification page, see, this model is certified for K7 model 4 up to 1.4 GHz.

    Two hours later, mobo, cpu and cooler mounted, box booted. CPU temperature: 85 Celsius. 5 minutes after starting the distributed.net client: CPU temperature 120 Celsius, self-rebooted, CPU dead.

    Now I wonder where in Alaska AMD certifies coolers.

  327. Thanks! by You+Are+A+Dumbass · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    At least be my freak, okay?

  328. MS at Chicago Comdex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When at Comdex in Chicago a few weeks back, we saw a booth that said Microsoft. It was a cute little white paper sign that looked like it had been printed with PrintShop. The booth for the electronic ab-workout thing was much bigger!

    Anyway, we stopped by thinking it was a mere retail booth, but the reps came off as really working for MS, so we went with it. With all of the .net hype, and them wearing visual studio.net shirts, we fel compelled to ask about .net. We just asked what exactly it was. The guy made reference to it changing everything (go figure) and said it could be used pretty much anywhere.

    Well, we asked about speed of code, size of code, and security. He said it would be just as fast, or faster, be super small (even will all of the extra unused included libraries) and would be just as secure. The kicker was that he made reference to XML as being a security feature..... so we kind of chuckled and walked away.

    Thank you M$!

  329. Google delists Slashdot by PaxTech · · Score: 1

    In A.D. 2002
    War was beginning.
    CmdrTaco: What happen ?
    Hemos: Somebody set up us the google delisting
    CmdrTaco: What !
    CowboyNeal: Main screen turn on
    CmdrTaco: It's You !!
    L Ron Hubbard: How are you gentlemen !!
    L Ron Hubbard: All your google hits are belong to us
    L Ron Hubbard: You are on the way to destruction
    CmdrTaco: What you say !!
    L Ron Hubbard: You have no chance to survive make your time
    L Ron Hubbard: HA HA HA HA ....
    CmdrTaco: Take off every 'DMCA'
    CmdrTaco: You know what you doing
    CmdrTaco: Move 'DMCA'
    CmdrTaco: For great justice

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    1. Re:Google delists Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now that was good for a laugh :)

  330. Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yeah, we'll interview you Real Soon Now."

  331. five nines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A marketing lie if ever there was one.

  332. GB = 1 billion bytes. by Joe+U · · Score: 1

    Thanks to Maxtor, Seagate and the rest, who lobbed off the 24's in the 1024 bytes.

  333. 17in, 19in, 21in monitors by Joe+U · · Score: 1

    With 16, 18, and 20in viewable screen space.

  334. The PS2 can crash by PaxTech · · Score: 2

    I crash GTA3 on my PS2 regularly. If I piss of the FBI enough and there are enough cars and explosions on the screen at the same time, it locks up and I have to restart the console. It's happened to me at least 10 times.

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    1. Re:The PS2 can crash by sunhou · · Score: 2

      GTA3 has never crashed my PS2 no matter how many FBI cars, army tanks, etc. are on the screen. But I just finished Ico, and that made the PS2 totally freeze up probably at least 8 times or so. Very annoying, since a couple of times it froze quite a while after the last save point. It's the only game I've had such problems with, though.

    2. Re:The PS2 can crash by wheany · · Score: 1

      My friend took drugs in the game (the ones that make you strong and fast, just like real drugs do too), and went to the train, while time was still slowed down, and he could not exit the train.

  335. "smart-card enabled dial-up access" by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought a cadre of smart-card readers and Netsign software from Litronic, now known as SSP Solutions, because they promised "smart-card enabled dial-up access" with Windows 98. When I got them and was programming the pin number into them, I noticed that the familiar ***** appears on one of the dialog boxes. I thought "nooo, this can't possibly be what I think it is" and downloaded a windows password cracker that just reads the memory location that contains the contents of those *****. Sure enough, there was my pin number, protected only by the brilliant security of the Windows 98 operating system. After explaining what "smart-card" means to the tech guy, Litronic refused to take the readers & software back, citing a "no return" policy on their website. Needless to say these useless products are sitting in a cabinet waiting for me to find a use for them in Linux. SSP has taken the webpage down that duped me into buying this product, but you can still find the claim in reviews such as this onet.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  336. Re:The $cientologists already have harassed Slashd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Life isn't like the movies, where in the end the hero gets rewarded for standing up for principle.

    Funny thing is slashdot did get rewarded. By posting that they had to remove the post thousands, if not hundreds of thousands chose to seek a copy of it and educated themselves on the Co$.

  337. I got this in a little late, but... by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1
    ...several isp's telling their customers that the uploading from p2p clients causes download speeds to drop like a rock, so they cap uploading speeds to help speed the downloads up (on full duplex OC3 and DS3 mind you...).

    ...and then the cap is so tight, that the sub modem uploading speeds make the simple dns, http server requests, and cookie uploads take so long its almost like I don't even have broadband when surfing.

    Is that some double speak bullshit or what? My neighbors and I are thinking about pitching in for a $400-$600 a month full T1 line and splitting the cost. ...maybe help with the costs by hosting some small websites.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  338. Consumer Advocacy by $beirdo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm really happy to see Slashdot discussing as many consumer advocacy issues as they have been in the past few years. If you agree with the general stance of this forum, there IS something you can do about it!

    Vote Nader! Vote consumer advocacy!

  339. Howabout... by Sivar · · Score: 1

    "Does Windows cluster as well as Linux? Windows clusters FAR better than Linux! In fact, out Hotmail service has over five THOUSAND clustered servers!"
    (that last part is accurate. He fails to mention, though, that many of those they had to add to handle the same load after switching them slowly from FreeBSD/Qmail)

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  340. Not quite Vendor to Customer by lemming552 · · Score: 1

    We had a sale's engineer show up at the "customer" to install the system and the "customer" was wondering what he and the $100,000 worth of boxes were doing there. Turns out the sales weasel had forged the sales docs...

  341. Microsoft by ejoe_mac · · Score: 1

    Windows Scales. Yea, whatever

  342. Microsoft lies...a lot....a lot lot....a super lot by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 1

    A good one I ran into recently was from Microsoft. They sent a rep out to our school and showed us all this really cool software in the form of videos. It was a full circle product for education. It delivered content, allow content creation, allow teacher/student interaction, taimed the web, reported grades, and even beamed grades to parents pocketpcs. It was great. We asked them to bring the app in and show it to us in real life. It turned out it's Encarta Class Server. They left one little thing out. All the features in the video dont exist. It was a big pipe dream. The server app sucked. The client app sucked. The content was garbage. We couldn't help but laugh at them. -Tim

    --

    Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
  343. Thanks man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good read that. I always wondered what the other side to that story is. Seems I've been mistaken 'bout Michael for a while... Just wish that site had gone up _earlier_.

  344. Sounds like what happened to me.... by FKell · · Score: 1

    Mine was a dead CD-ROM drive. It was 6 months since I bought the system, and the drive would not eject a CD, it would only open before the boot sequence.

    Anyway, I figure they would have it fixed within 2-3 days, it's only a CD-ROM replacement, not like its difficult or anything...

    They did some other testing on the system and saw that the hard drive had a whole mess of bad sectors on it (power supply was faulty and cause lots of power-losses during writing to the hard drive, that at least was fixed by HP, who sent out one of their repair men to my house cause it was within a month of getting the system)...We so they decide to replace my hard drive, I.E., just removed the old one, no data backed up, and sent it back to HP, and put in a new one.

    So now, I have a computer with a broken CD-ROM drive and a blank hard drive. They said they would have reloaded the hard drive, but they couldn't get the system to boot, even with a boot disk. Its a good thing I at least HAVE CLUE ONE ABOUT HOW COMPUTERS WORK.

    When I get it home and take it apart (since it wouldn't boot, just like they said), it takes all of 10 seconds to see that 1) they placed the hard drive on the same IDE channel as the CD-ROM, 2) Both the CD-ROM and the hard drive were set as master

    I call them up immediatly and completly tell off the manager of their repair center, about how incompitant the people were that worked on this system. And made a formal complaint to corporate and HP as they were a certified repair center. Note that at this time, my CD-ROM drive had still not been replaced and/or repaired. Next day I get a call from CompUSA saying that they recieved a new CD-ROM for my system, they couldn't get the same one that I origionally had, but they got the latest one from HP for my system, and that they could install it if I wanted, or I could just come by and pick it up and install it myself (without it breaking my warrentee too)...Hmmm...I really wonder what finally got their asses moving, HP calling them up or corporate...I am betting on HP personally.

    Needless to say, there was no way I was letting them touch the system to install the CD-ROM drive.

    1. Re:Sounds like what happened to me.... by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

      Ok...so let me get this straight. You took your system in for a problem CD drive. They took a month and replaced you HD and didn't touch your CD...just summing up...

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    2. Re:Sounds like what happened to me.... by FKell · · Score: 1

      nods in agreement...Pretty bad huh? That's why I will never go to them again (or most other places as well)...and they made real stupid mistakes too.

  345. puff..... damn that's good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your commercials suck.

  346. Doh...Forgot: was a month when I took comp home... by FKell · · Score: 1

    I waited a week and called them up, that was when they said they ordered the part and were still waiting for it. A week after that, when I called again was when they told me the replaced my hard drive. The next week when I called they said the part was backordered. The next time I called I said I was comming to pick it up that day, no matter the condition of the system cause I was without a PC for way too long to fix a problem that wasn't really a bad problem, it was just inconvient to have to reboot the system everytime I wanted to change a CD...

  347. 386 vs. 486 by P[B · · Score: 1

    I was collecting information to decide about the biggest purchase I ever made: my first computer.
    I didn't know too much about the matter; I hade some ideas about 16 bit and 32 bit, and I knew that there was some mysterious thing called "co-processor", and I knew that 486 computers were newer, faster and more expensive than 386 ones.
    It was a rather tough decision, as I wasn't exactly rich, and I wanted a good computer really bad. So I went to a shop (Vobis in Karlsruhe, Germany) and asked the salesperson: "Could you please explain the exact difference between a 386 and a 486?"
    This guy answered: "That's quite easy. You know, the information is passed on and processed via electric signals?" - I nodded. He continued: "Of course, there can only be a very tiny portion of information on one wire - current or no current." (more like voltage or no voltage, I thought. But I said nothing.) "The difference between a 386 and a 486 is, that there are 386 wires going in a 386 and 486 wires in a 486, so the 486 can process 100 bits of information more at one time."
    It took a few seconds till I found out how to react. I asked him what that bit stuff (16 vs 32 bit) I heard about was, then, if modern processors already operated with 486 bits. While he was stuttering something about him having to read this in their sales brochure, I continued asking about coprocessors, the difference between 486-DX and 486-SX and finally (he was rather sweating and red-faced by then) told him that I'd never buy a computer in a shop where nobody knows anything about computers. I left.

  348. @Home by TheViffer · · Score: 2

    "Never feel disconnected again!"

    Ummm .. wait a second.

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  349. Fluoride is a GOOD thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a neurotoxin with a toxicity above that of lead and only slightly below arsenic. It is a heavy metal, ("coincidentally" just like lead and arsenic), which means it accumulates in your body. It causes fluorosis and is suspected of contributing to osteoparhosis(spelling anyone?), and alzheimers. Not surprising since it's a HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCT generated by the aluminum industry. Aluminum? Yup, also linked to alzheimers. Go ahead, you're a bunch of smart guys...look up the MSDS sheets on it then look at your tube of toothpaste. See that big old "DO NOT SWALLOW" on it? Now you know why.

    PS. Don't forget the water supply...Yet more evidence the government really does want to kill you....:=p~~

    1. Re:Fluoride is a GOOD thing by Panoramix · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're quite right. Fluoridation, the most evil commie conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids...

  350. Your DSL will be ready in 2 weeks by paulschreiber · · Score: 2

    -- Telocity, early 2000

    And it took 86 days to show up. No kidding.

    FWIW, Telocity is now DirectTV broadband. I wonder if they're any better.

    Paul

  351. Re:Good point.... by Hadlock · · Score: 2

    although, i've heard many times before that the simplistic 386 archetechture is vastly more efficent per transistor than these new-fangled 32 bit archetechtures. you might not be able to run 32 bit software on it, but a 386 @ .13 microns @ 400 mhz would probably a) be a great processor for pdas b) swamp the palm market with easy to code for palm devices, AND be compatible with virtually every dos program ever

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  352. "AMD chips are not Windows compatible" by DABANSHEE · · Score: 3, Funny

    Told to me by a salesman at a Harvey Norman Store, when I said I can knock together a AMD system from parts at the computer markets for not much more than half the price.

  353. DELL & RAMBUS false publicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember that Tomshardware article?, Dissecting Rambus, I think the ocassion deserves to remember it, specially the High-bandwidth Misinformation. 'Love will make you do things that you know is wrong': "Dell is perhaps the world's largest manufacturer of personal computers. Dell is also widely considered closely wedded to Intel. On the computer titan's site, the speed of the RDRAM used in its systems is difficult to find and, for the typical consumer, difficult to interpret. After drilling down to the RDRAM specifications for the Dell XPS B, the computer giant provides information that is not only misleading, but also simply false. Dell boasts that "RDRAM provides up to 1.6 GB/sec of memory bandwidth versus only 800 MB/sec with conventional SDRAM," but elsewhere on this page the frequency of the RDRAM used in the system is stated at 356 MHz. As already explained in this article, this indicates in an indirect way that the system is equipped with the slower PC700 RDRAM which will never reach a bandwidth of 1.6 GB/sec. Also on this page Dell states correctly that the bus width for its RDRAM systems is 16 bits, but IT ALSO STATES THAT SDRAM'S BUS WIDTH IS ONLY 8 BITS when, as you already know, SDRAM has a 64-bit bus. Incorrect at best, misleading at worst, Dell should be harshly criticized for providing this disservice to its customers. In light of other misinformation currently surrounding RDRAM, Dell's actions are cast in an unfavorable light."

  354. Exodus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bankruptcy will not impact our operations at all. We will not be closing datacenters. We haven't lost a single customer...

  355. Musqitos in space! by lennygrafix · · Score: 0

    i was trying to but an ultra-sound-anti-musqito-device the other day.

    the vendor assured me that it was very good, 'cause it was tested in space...

    *musqitos in space*

    great movie title :)

    --
    ----------------------------------
    it aint all _that_ bad,.... right?
  356. My favorite lie.. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2



    "VA is a good company. They care about the Linux community." - Everyone, a year ago.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  357. Re:My Vote: How is this funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm tired of this fucking picture popping up and destroying my apetite for 15 minutes.

    ahhhh!

  358. Re:The actual product name of that press release.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one seems to be a better match. look at the later paragraphs.

    http://www.edify.com/pr/press_releases/2001rel/s ie bel.html

  359. Oracle: Unbreakable?! by Sir+Tandeth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This was a very popular and ill fated ad campaign. http://online.securityfocus.com/news/308

  360. Re:Good point.... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Actually the 386 was the first "32bit" x86 compatible chip in the range, just that, at the time.. most people were running old 16bit software on it anyway.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  361. Re: Guns by AVee · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Windows doesn't make BSOD's, people make BSOD's...

  362. Why the blue screen of death is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a genuine explanation of why we got the BSOD on machines:

    We had a batch of PCs which failed - we did the research and noted that the serial nos on the SIMMs were from a known faulty batch so we invited Digital (remember them?) in to replace the memory on the failing PCs. Here's the "technical expert" explanation of the fault:

    "NT is a pre-emptive multi-tasking system, that means that it tries to guess what you're about to do and load up the memory in advance - sometimes you don't do what it expects and it has the wrong items in memory -- that's what causes the BSOD".

    Apart from the factual howlers - the blatant "blame the victim" approach did wonders for their reputation with us; mind you they say laughter is a good medicine.

  363. REPAIR a MOTHERBOARD! by samjam · · Score: 1

    I know an old gentleman (correct term for this guy) who was getting quite aquainted with computers and had a 384DX40 with 4MB RAM.

    He had some motherboard problems and the shop wanted 300 quid (UK pounds) to "repair" it.

    These were the days when it cost 30 quid to buy one.

    [They also sold him a 4-shade greyscale hand scanner for 150 quid or there-abouts.]

    1. Re:REPAIR a MOTHERBOARD! by JLester · · Score: 1

      In college, a friend's Tandy had the floppy drive go bad. The local Radio Shack wanted $125 parts and labor to replace the drive. I stuck in a $28 floppy (this was in about 1994) and did it for free.

      Jason

      --
      "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
  364. Salary- Ttal cost to company by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

    Oh, welcome on board sir. This wonderful figure is your yearly salary! So, don't even think about those other offers from other companies because we start you out on a bit lower salary and increase it every couple of months. Now , what we won't tell you that this is TOTAL COST TO COMPANY. That means that this is the maximum amount of money that we will spend on you in a year. So, from that figure you can deduct income tax, medical aid, retirement fund, 13th check and maybe even training. So, what you have left (if any) will be devided into 12 months and that will be your true monthly salary. Oh Shit! They got me again, those Corporate bastards!

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  365. ISP folder by pafrusurewa · · Score: 1

    A couple of years back, when the world was still on 28.8k my (only) local cable ISP had folders saying: "Using our cable service you can download at more than 300 times the speed you could using a standard 28.8 modem. So what would normally take a year to download can now be downloaded in just one day."

    The service they were advertising is a 300kbps downstream cable service.

  366. Re:Good point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even an overclocked p4 at 3.5 gHz still can't beat a new Athlon

    I call bullshit.
    Let's see ya back that up.

  367. big lie by TheCyko1 · · Score: 1

    1 whole inch! garanteed!!

    --
    This message was brought to you by the death of 30 brain cells.
  368. Re:Good point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To the best of my knowledge, all Athlon mobos display CPU speed on startup as well.

    Actually, I remmeber reading that AMD didn't want the actual CPU clock speed displayed anywhere in the POST, back when this PR for Athlons all started.

    It's not as if AMD is trying to shove the speed under the rug entirely

    Apparently they are.

    *putting on my flameproof suit*

  369. We have met the enemy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and he is us.

    The sad fact is that practically no one can articulate what their software actually does. It's all vague and subjective. So you go out and buy the software anyway without any idea of what it really does and then you complain because it doesn't do what you think it was supposed to do?

  370. Sinclair ZX80 by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 2

    This 1980 home computer came with 1k (yes 1k of memory) with memory expansion packs ranging from 16k up to a whopping 64k (surely enough for anyone as Bill G would say)

    Anyway the really outrageous advertising claim involved an advert stating that the ZX80 could run a nuclear powerstation (with the advert showing a ZX80 with 16k ram expansion)

    What is really bad is that the ZX80 was notorious for 'Ram pack wobble' meaning that if you nudged the ram pack by mistake....it crashed

    Not witstanding the fact that it would be totally unsuitable for running a powerstation for a number of other factors such as not having a real time os, system unreliability etc.

    I always wondered whether the Russians had seen the advert and tired to use (or copy one) one at Chernoybl...one for the conspiracy theorists.

    1. Re:Sinclair ZX80 by henley · · Score: 2

      You mean a Sinclair ZX81.

      The ZX80 came with 1K RAM, yes. But the expansion pack was only 4K.

      "Ram Pack Wobble" was a classic symptom of the ZX81 also - cheaper connectors as I recall (not JUST that there was no connector as such - just the PCB traces run to the edge of the board - but also the positioning of the board vis-a-vie the case)

      --

      --
      I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
    2. Re:Sinclair ZX80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a PBS show once that had C64's running a nuke power plant. As the owner of one I was plenty sacred! Oh, it was a drama, not a documentary. ;)

      ac

  371. CD Burning Bullsh*t by IceFreak2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was in PC World in Yeovil (England) about a week ago (I know, I know, but there's virtually nothing else around here) when I overheard a truly amazing conversation between a spotty-faced salesman (correction; sales-pre-pubescent-teen), and some poor shmuck looking to buy a new PC.

    Customer: So this new machine has a CD-ROM burner built in yes? [Gesturing to some off-the-shelf PC with XP Home installed] Will I be able to transfer my music files to a CD that I can play in the car?

    Sales-pre-pubescent-teen: [Sensing a quick sale] Oh no, you can't do that out of the box. You see, the music files that you'll be playing are in MP3 format, whereas CDs that you can play in your car use a format known as RealAudio.

    I kid you not.

    --
    Life is like a sewer; what you get out of it depends on what you put into it...
    1. Re:CD Burning Bullsh*t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This reminds me of my favorite joke, from Steve Wozniak's Official Computer Joke Book:

      Q: What's the difference between a computer salesman and a used car salesman?

      A: The used car salesman knows when he's lying.

    2. Re:CD Burning Bullsh*t by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Ha, I can top that:
      I was at fry's(local computer store) a few years ago.
      Me:"Whats the range of this CB?"
      Sales:"What do you mean"
      Me:"How far away can I be from someone and still have the recieve my signal?"
      Sales:"Everywhere"
      me:"uuuhhhh I don't thind..."
      Sales(now exsaperatred with me): "if you are on channel 3, then anybody in the world on channnel 3 can hear you"
      me:"its like 4 watts..."
      sales:"You can bounce its signal off the moon to get to the other side of the planet"
      I walk away, to stunned to even say "you moron"
      true story.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  372. 2 immediately come to mind by Moosifer · · Score: 1

    1) Special green magic markers can make your audio CD's sound better.
    2) Hard Drive manufacturers decide that 1 MB = 1,000 rather than 2^10

    1. Re:2 immediately come to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that anything like 10^6 vs 2^20? Or did you mean 1kB?

  373. Larry Ellison at NAB... by notenoughnamespace · · Score: 1

    Some years ago I was at the National Exhibition of Broadcasters in Las Vegas, where the keynote talk was presented by Larry Ellison, which I thought might be of interest. Much music and effects (including 3-D glasses on every seat) introduced the man himself who cam on stage and started talking about home-banking, home-shopping and the like, all via your TV and all powered by Oracle. He then stated, clearly, that this was not the future, but the present, and that at the current time;

    "Ordinary people in the UK are using their television every day to do these things with Sky TV"

    ...which was blatant, outright, fiction as Sky hadn't launched any kind of interactive TV at that time. He went on to introduce someone from Sky and the two of them talked about how users of Sky, through the power of Oracle, were able to bank, shop, etc. at the touch of their remote control. This was plainly untrue at that time, and I felt like standing up and shouting, but eventually just walked out in disgust.

    It stunned me that someone like Larry Ellison would stand up in front of thousands of people and talk such bollocks, and such bollocks that was so easily provable to be bollocks. I've always wondered if he was miss-informed or knew he was lying.

  374. Told to lie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in 1995, I was working for a small company based on the Wirral in the UK.
    I was part of the field engineers. Hardware installation's, repairs etc. One day, on a site I visited regularly, I was replacing a small fly cable in the back of a monitor. I broke the tube. So I cleaned up the mess, got the swap out monitor from the van and told the onsite contact what I had done. He laughed and was happy to have a swap out monitor. No worries.
    I got back and told my boss. He was ok with it. But somehow the account manager found out and was not happy. She stormed, and I do mean stormed. Into the office, shouting, pointing fingers and then informed me that if that happens again that I should lie to the customer!!! My boss and I pointed out that lying to our biggest customer was not the way to do business. She then went on, over a 12-month period, to push out everyone she didn't like. Screwing the MD was how she got away with this. The guy was a jellyfish.

    The company is dead now. Three months after I left the receivers went in. Just goes to show that bad management can kill a company.

  375. Hotmail Spam Filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm fishing for a high rating on this one, but please, (in the tone of a talk-show guest hyping up the crowd); "Who uses Hotmail? Ever get any.. spam? Yhaaa I turn on the filter, what does it do? NOTHING." For some reason I have to use hotmail once in awhile but the 50-odd spam per day on an unpublished email makes me want to cry. Their spam filter is an insult to the word "filter".

  376. This rulez all by VitaminKsGood4u · · Score: 1

    ive got 2 real good ones... I once went into a store with my brother and asked if they sold 56k modems. the sales person tolds us they were sorry but they didnt carry them... well any way me and my brother turned around to walk out and as my brother walked around the corner of an ailse he triped over a pile of 56k modems that happen to be on sale.\new story; And this is the grand mother of them all. me and my boss once went into a store to buy new computers for video editing, we asked the salesperson what he sugested for a motherboard, and he asked us what type of machines we were currently using.We told him we were using a dual processor Intergraph workstation with a wildcat graphics card and 512 meg ram...(brace yourself cause here it comes) he told us "Thats nothing", and told us they just recieved machines with the new pentium processor and built in FAT32 chip. All we could say is "wow that is impressive" and then left the store.

    1. Re:This rulez all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always ask if the modem has *LRF support. Most salesman will tell you yes.

      ac

      * little rubber feet

  377. my favorite by maxpublic · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft Works!"

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  378. Microsoft on NT by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    Better Unix than Unix

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  379. Used Car Ad by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    Consumer Reports used to make fun of mktng, and one they published was a misprint in a newspaper:

    Used Cars at New Car Prices!!!

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  380. Microsoft Works by nard · · Score: 1

    Says it all rearly ;-)

  381. Write Once Run Anywhere by quakeaddict · · Score: 2

    enough said.

    --
    I'm still working on a clever footer.
  382. Re:Good point.... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
    Uh, moron, the 80386 is a 32-bit chip.

    Anyone without a basic (and I mean basic)knowledge of microcomputing is no longer allowed to use the word "micron" in a post.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  383. Blank disk instead of being late by jolshefsky · · Score: 1

    I worked at a small company (that is now defunct but will remain nameless) that wrote software for other companies. I was told by my coworkers that before I worked there, they were going to be really late shipping some software so they shipped a blank disk to a customer to stall for time--later to claim that the disk must have been corrupted.

    --
    --- Jason Olshefsky

    Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

    1. Re:Blank disk instead of being late by Squidgee · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's amazing...
      But, WOuldn't endusers notice the lack of disk errrors, and the fact nothing was -on- the disk? Maybe it's just us geeks, then?

  384. Salesman got me fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the engineer from a vendor tell me his product absolutely would not work in our deployment. His supervisor told me their product was not appropriate for our needs. A week later their salesman complained to an idiot consultant working in our corporate office. The salesman and consultant, who was making twice my salary, told our CIO that I was rude and I got written up.

    Stupid bastards. The CIO ended up writing a check for $750K for a product that still doesn't work after a year and a half. I got fired and ended up back in radio.

    My $45.00 solution using Apache/PHP/MySQL was ridiculed in that same corprate meeting -- but my shit is still working, despite my departure nearly nine months ago. I guess I get the last laugh.

    BTW, if you check the vendor's site -- their product is dead. Whatever.

  385. make.money.fast! by ader · · Score: 1

    It's been ten years, I'm beginning to suspect that I'm never gonna see a return on all that cash I mailed out...

    Ade_
    /

    --
    Big Bubbles (no troubles) - what sucks, who sucks and you suck
  386. Become a Software Monopoly 101 by ader · · Score: 1

    You want the truth?! You can't handle the truth!

    Ade_
    /

    --
    Big Bubbles (no troubles) - what sucks, who sucks and you suck
  387. Re:Good point.... by CTalkobt · · Score: 1


    (e.g. a 4Mz Z80 was about the same speed as a 1Mz 6502 -- mostly becasuse the Z80 took 4 clock cycles to grab a byte of memory while a 6502 only took one).

    Uh, The 6502 _always_ took at least 2 clock cycles ( typically only 2 )... The z80 on the other hand took an enourmas amount of clock cycle for some operations - often 4-6. I think that's where the differance came in.

    --
    There's a gorilla from Manilla whose a fella that stinks of vanilla and has salmonella.
  388. Re: Guns by Aus-Rust · · Score: 1

    and according to a study in england a few years ago 90 per cent of all people are caused by accident

    --
    one day I'll have a .sig all of my own
  389. We're upgrading hardware this week. by The+Evil+Dwarf+from · · Score: 1

    Our ISP (soon to be ex) told me and my boss that they were getting ready to install upgraded internet hardware. It was supposed to clear up all of the internet problems we had been having. The funny thing is that during the meeting with this git, I got a phone call from one of their hardware engineers who would have to be intimately involved in installing of this hardware and he had no clue what the git was talking about. What he said sounded great, except it was 100% pure bs. The git was a VP of the company... which is now in Chapter 11.(I asked my engineer friend what he planned to do with all of his worthless options... build a paper mache castle be-like...)

    The funny thing is that our saleperson was in the meeting too and she said that he lied to us... she was laid off shortly after that. I think she was lucky.

  390. Biggest Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That linux would make it on the desktop!

  391. My Vote - Windows Application Refreshing by hillct · · Score: 2

    In the early betas of Windows 2000 Advanced Server there was a concept called 'Windows Application Refresh' which was esentially a scheduled reboot, which addressed memory leaks and other issues of Microsoft Product Entropy. Thankfully I have not been cursed with having to use it since then. Can anyone tell me if Microsoft is still trying to sell this steaming pile of Cr@p as a standard system administration practice?

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    1. Re:My Vote - Windows Application Refreshing by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

      I was at a German company that had a few (10 or so) NT 4 servers. They all had a script that was schedualed to reboot at night everyday. And they were running terminal server on them too!

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    2. Re:My Vote - Windows Application Refreshing by Attila · · Score: 1
      Don't know about Advanced Server, but I've seen this feature on Win2K Pro. Every fifth time or so I run RealPlayer, my laptop suddenly reboots. I guess I should be grateful that Win2K doesn't just crash every now and then like NT did.

      I've noticed that when this happens my screen goes blue for just a moment before the video resets. So, as promised, the Win2K refresh feature also eliminates the Blue Screen of Death! MS innovation at its best.

      --
      Dear Will, the plums were poisoned. -- Cheese Club
    3. Re:My Vote - Windows Application Refreshing by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Your computer rebooting is probably because it just had blue-screened. In its infinite wisdom MS decided to automate the resetting of the computer after the BSOD and so takes the responsibility away from its users. You can turn this "feature" off by unchecking the checkbox System Properties, Advanced, Startup and Recovery, Automatically reboot.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  392. Microsoft and OS/2 by revlee · · Score: 1

    Basically anything Microsoft has ever said about OS/2 would qualify. "OS/2 is Windows done right" was one of my favorites at the first OS/2 developers conference. Then there was the Corporate OS/2 days on the Redmond campus where Ballmer spent an hour extolling the virtues of OS/2.

  393. Re:Automatic Butt-holer. by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    they have to have *something* to surf on

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  394. That's My Bill.... by Myuu · · Score: 1

    "IIS is secure" -Microsoft "a 486 is all Windows will ever need" -Bill Gates "Windows costs less than Linux" -Microsoft Press Release

    --

    forget it.
  395. Y2K! by bunhed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I still can't get over the BS that I heard re Y2K. The best (or worst if you will) was one of my clients was told they had to upgrade their AIX, plus more memory plus a bigger SCSI drive, all total around $10k. I did some research and they didn't need the upgrade. The vendor insisted to the point of threatening to drop support if they did not comply. So I took the president of the vendor company out for lunch and asked him what he was doing. "You know they [my client] don't need to this upgrade." I said. He looks me in the eye and says, "I don't care want you say, I want my money."
    I'm so proud the be a tech specialist at moments like that.

  396. Thank you for holding... by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    We are experiencing unusually high call volumes.

  397. I've run into these guys by prisoner · · Score: 1

    not too long ago. I avoided an argument by just using a different service but the poster is right. The approval code is the same every time.

  398. How can you forget SoftRAM95? by BRSQUIRRL · · Score: 1

    The product that, as advertised, would double your available RAM using "software memory", but was later discovered to do absolutely nothing?

    The really sad part of that already-tragic tale is that hundreds of thousands of copies of it were sold...

  399. Not all bad... by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    From my brief stint in the Canadian Army Reserve, I can say that this doesn't apply universally to army food. Canadian IMP's (individual meal packs) are pretty yummy. Even the mac & cheese, which for some reason tends to be a "breakfast", is more edible than KD, and things like the beef stew, chicken a la king, etc. are great! The extras vary widely in quality, from the appalling instant coffee, to the downright weird but quite edible "petit pain" (bread, that's the French label) which we figured would last forever if not opened.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  400. Flogging the moon on a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can think of one vendor who routinely listed a heap of stuff on the spec sheet that the product DID NOT have. At best, these features might be described as being on the "TODO" list; things like SNMP and other buzzword-compliant acronyms. If you'd said, "Hey, SNMP is so last year, what about WBEM?", they'd have added that to the spec sheet by next week. Thus, the development process relied more on word processors than compilers. If a customer ever genuinely required the expected functionality and it was necessary to close the sale then yes, they'd put some effort into implementing it (usually as a quick hack). But not before.

    But no customers ever noticed or raised the apparent disparity between what the product was supposed to do and evident reality. In fact, they had no use for those features (none of them owned an SNMP management console, let alone had the smarts to set one up). They just wanted to see the magic letters in the spec, to reassure them that the product was in some sense standards-compliant. Not one of them thought to test the alleged functionality in their free eval copy, or ask why it wasn't referenced in the otherwise comprehensive manual.

    Moral: customers get the salespeople they deserve.

    The problems people have with salespeople all spring from the false assumption that they possess any ethics, morals or goodwill in their dealings whatsoever. They have targets to meet. That's it, period.

    Moral: salespeople have none, though they might occasionally confuse them with morale.

    (I suspect that most of the best posts in this thread are anonymous. ;-)

  401. The Biggest Lie.... by AciDive · · Score: 1

    I have ever been told was by a Qwest sales person, They told me that they could give me a fiber run from there local CO(15 Miles away) to my former employers door. This obviously turned into the biggest lie I was ever told by a vendor.

    --
    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect." Linus Torvalds
  402. Dell by geekguy · · Score: 1

    Dude, You're getting a Dell.

    Dude, no I'm not you liar.

    --
    -- Any comments seen here are not mine, but a mixture of alchohol and lack of sleep.
  403. My Ex-Wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I Do."

  404. oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With out question, Oracle wins the cake. I was the CTO of a web company (part of the dot com flame out, of course). We had not one, not two, but three Oracle VPs tell us that they could do the work, on time, and within budget. They spend a small bucket of our money just writting a proposal that made it obvious to all that they were flamingly incompetent.

    The money, and more importantly the time lost was infuriating. I never thought I'd say this, but in the lying contest, Larry beats even Bill.

    To Oracle's small credit, we heard that at least one of the VPs and a handful of other people got fired over this fiasco. That didn't help me any; however, it might just help the rest of you.

  405. Everyone sells! by michib01 · · Score: 1

    Is there any vendor who doesn't claim to better than he really is?
    C'mon, even if you go toa small market to buy a bunch of apples (the fruit one...), you will hear something like "this is the best fruit you'll ever taste!"
    And even within a company enviroment, a CIO will "sell" his project as the most important for the company, telling the CEO whatever is useful to grant him the necessary budget...

    --
    - "Having a clean conscience is sign of bad memory"
  406. Sun Cosmic rays by Nalez · · Score: 1

    The best one I can think of was when Sun Microsystems came to told us that some of the e-cache errors we where getting are caused by cosmic rays. I think they even brought a Astrophysicist in.

  407. Can we touch on our employer's lies next? by JohnCub · · Score: 1

    Lets just say that a person works for a publicly traded company. And said company puts out certain news releases. And let's say you are the database administrator with access to all of the (we'll call it...) REAL data. And let's suppose the news releases contain out and out lies...

    Now let us suppose that due to technicalities, this database administrator is not an "insider"...

    What responsibility, morally and legally, does said database administrator have?

    ...just a thought.

    --
    -= Why can't I add 'Anonymous Coward' to my list of Foes? =-
  408. Re:...record them to tape (or 5 1/4 floppy). by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

    Umm.. That would be 8" floppy. Or punchcards, more likely.

    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
  409. Cosmic Rays are affecting your servers by rootX · · Score: 1

    A certain large company that makes SPARC based servers, told us in a meeting that one of their lines of CPUs continually panics the systems, forcing a reboot, due to the affects of "cosmic rays" on the on board CPU memory caches.

    --
    -- sed s/liberty/profit/g US.Constitution
    1. Re:Cosmic Rays are affecting your servers by pwringger · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are several articles about this phenomenon: http://www.forbes.com/global/2000/1113/0323026a_pr int.html http://www.ida.liu.se/~abdmo/SNDFT/docs/ram-soft.h tml

  410. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by gammoth · · Score: 1
    Netscape, for example, doesn't like to stay running for an entire day without crashing at least once. That's not a Windows problem.

    This is not necessarily the case. An application may crash because system calls put it in an inconsistant state or corrupt it's memory. The (published) Windows API is a debacle. Of course, MS programmers know the work arounds. Furthermore, an application crash should not make the entire system unstable.

    I have not used Win2k much, but the first day I used it, it crashed as I was shutting down applications. Fortunately, I don't have to used MS products much.

  411. From a former sales engineer. by ProfBooty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to be a sales engineer, the company eventually changed its policy and we couldn't go to the development engineers to get technical info, we had to get the "marketing" approved version. Sufices to say, the marketing version was dumbed down and totally lacking technical detail. Long time clients weren't particualy happy about this.

    It used to be that they hired engineers to sell the product, spent months training them on the software making you actually learn how to use the software so you could sell it (thereby giving you more credability). Eventually they switched over to more salesly types who totally depended on applications engineering support staff to answer any technical questions. These guys would promise the moon and some of them were quite successful without any real understanding of what the software did or how it worked. On the otherhand, sales engineers like myself were more likely to flat out tell you if you actually could use or need our product other than wasting your time on it.

    What I would find amusing some times about the job was that when you would give a presentation that there was always one guy in the audience who wanted to be a jackass and ask stupid questions or attempt to make you(the sales engineer) look stupid, it was always funny to give him the correct answer to shut him up as the guy usually never realised that you were a real engineer at one point in your life. Kind of reminds me of the dilbert comic where he talks about abusing sales people as it is the one thing he can do in his life where its ok to be rude and demeaning to people(some sales people desirve it).

    On a side note, the reason salespeople act the way they do for the most part is because it works. I always treated everyone with respect, but the salesguy constantly calls you once you express interest to force you to move on it else you forget or get distracted with something else (in sales your job is always on the line, sales is usually the first staff to get cut when times start to go bad).

    If you wan't to get the real deal on anything, go speak with the applications engineer who supports the sales staff, they will usually give you an idea of the true capabilities of the product. Never trust the marketing guy, he will stretch the truth far more than the sales staff.

    Lastly, if you are an engineer who can write and talk well and likes working with people, try sales or applications engineering at somepoint in your career. The money is VERY good. Besides you can always go back to your old job.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  412. SBC Claim by BlueDeath · · Score: 1

    A representitive of SBC called about there new colation facility. After telling me all about there new 100million dollar facility in Irvine with such wonderful features like showers and an Internet bar I asked him how much they charged per MBit. He quickly replied $670 a MBit with my responce being that was outragous. He asked how much I was expecting and I let him know we were paying $300 a MBit right now and we were looking to pay that or lower. He responded that no one could possibly make any money selling bandwidth at that price and they will be going out of bussiness soon which is why I should move to their new facility.

  413. Adult Signature Required by kindbud · · Score: 2

    In 1996 I took delivery of a $5000 apochromatic refractor telescope for which I had waited 20 months to receive. UPS left it on the front porch of the house in the middle of Hollywood, California, despite numerous red/white stickers Adult Signature Required and the fact that the seller had paid for the certified delivery service. It was insured, so the $5000 was covered, but if it had been stolen, 20 months of waiting would have been for nothing.

    Never trust UPS to follow delivery instructions.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  414. The Lies of Dell Corporate by KosovoYankee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A while back, I was setting up PC's for a small research company. 2 of our brand new Dell's had arrived, but when plugged in, they wouldn't display anything properly. I called up Dell, and they assured me that they were aware of the problem, and that there was a "virus" in the video card of each machine. A "virus" in the videocard, I asked disbelievingly? Yes, they replied. I asked them how it had gotten in there, just to play along, and they informed me it must have been introduced enroute from their packing facility to my office. Somehow, a "virus" had transmuted into vapour and then lodged itself in the VIDEO CARDs of our brand new machines. But don't worry, they told me - there was a patch available from their website that would fix everything.

    Those lying jerks - why couldn't they just tell me there was a driver problem, and I could download the fixed drivers? WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

    --
    - If This Peace Is Fictious, I Shall Destroy It
  415. Best Buy by LlamaDragon · · Score: 1

    Older gentleman: "Why do I need a gold-plated printer cable?"

    Salesman: "The connection is better, so you get higher quality prints. And it's faster."

    -LlamaDragon

  416. OO means different things to different people by alispguru · · Score: 2

    The best article I've seen on this subject is by Jonathan Rees - go look at it on Paul Graham's web site here.

    People who say "Java isn't OO" really mean "Java doesn't have the features I like in other OO languages". Please say what you mean.

    For the record, I'm a Lisp/CLOS hacker and I don't like the style of OO Java promotes.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  417. As a horny little 8 year old... by eLudd · · Score: 1

    I was duped by Marvel comics. Imagine my surprise when I first donned my X-Ray Glasses... "It's easy to deceive a child" - John Lydon

    --
    "That's a fact, in my opinion" -some peacenik on CNN
  418. Re:We make a secure Operating System (OT) by bkocik · · Score: 1
    Hrm...xmedar. As in, ex-Medar, Inc.? Farmington Hills?

  419. Time Warner Cable wins hands down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the cable modem install guy failed to show for the SECOND TIME, I called Time Warner Cable to complain. I was greeted with a recorded message that said "Hello, and thanks for calling Time Warner Cable, where on-time service is our guarantee."

    I spoke with somebody in Customer (No)Service and asked what "...where on-time service is our guarantee" means if the installer doesn't bother to show up. What, exactly, does TWC guarantee?

    "Well, it means that if we aren't on time, we'll come back some other time, or even another day. We guarantee that."

    (Insert uncomfortably long period of silence here.)

    "Alrightly then... with whom do I speak about cancelling my order???"

  420. Big companies make the best claims... by bdh · · Score: 1
    Vendor lies? Loads of them.

    From an Atari salesman at a computer fair: "The Atari 1200XL has more than 800 applications for it; the Apple ][+ has more than 500". Technically true, the Apple application count was considered to be about 20,000 by that point, which is more than 500... (1983).

    From Microsoft: "Our Pascal compiler is faster than Turbo Pascal" (1985, when this $900 compiler took 3X as long to compile on a hard disk equipped IBM AT compared to the $49 Turbo Pascal compiler running on a floppy based 8088).

    From a VMS-based Ada language vendor: "you need to go with Ada for embedded systems, since the C language is clearly being phased out". (1988) Riiight.

    From Sun: "Open Look is the way to go; Motif is just a fad". (1991) Similar claims about News obsoleting PostScript were made.

    From Atari: "the Jaguar will definately blow away the Amiga" (199...2?)

    From Sun: When faced with a Sun IPX running at 99% CPU usage versus the equivalent HP model running at 40%, the Sun rep's answer was the 99% usage was a good thing because we "were getting your money's worth" [sic]. No, he was not kidding, he actually thought his machines being 60% slower was a good thing. (1994)

    From IBM: "OS/2 will be available whereever DOS is sold" (1992). And of course, "IBM is firmly committed to OS/2" (1997, two weeks before IBM Germany announced they were discontinuing marketing of the product).

    From Oracle: "by the year 2000, PCs will be solely legacy systems" (1998). Our rep was nothing if not faithful to the party line about NCs.

    From a DSL provider, explaining why the service was performing at below 30% of promised speeds: they were "cleaning the pipes" (eh?) and that DSL speeds worsen in August because "the summer heat makes the wiring stretch". (2002)

    One of the best lies I ever managed to catch vendor making redhanded was a multimillion dollar bid where their product was clearly inferior. They promised the new super duper version would be done by year end. This was in November, and no one had seen so much as a specification of it. We had a teleconference with their VP, who obviously was unaware of what the salescreature had promised; the VP said point blank that the beta program was not even scheduled to start until March...

  421. Modem Cable by ansible · · Score: 2

    It might possibly not be bullshit, for some marginal situations.

    Even POTS lines are twisted pairs to reduce emissions and interference. Most generic phone cable is flat, not twisted pair. This leads to a reduction in signal quality. For a six foot run, it's probably not a big deal. For a longer run it might start to make a difference.

  422. "Internet Ready" by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Surge Protectors with RJ-11 jacks to protect your modem are "Internet Ready".

    Belkin, so forward looking.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  423. Windows TCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, windows TCO anybody?

  424. It's not an "American version," by HermanH · · Score: 1

    it's just poor grammar. Another example I've often seen on /.: "irregardless."

    --
    Badgeez?! We don' need no steenking badgeez!
    1. Re:It's not an "American version," by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think "irrardless" is generally used when "irrespective" is intended.

  425. I think you answered your own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Clue: slashdot puts the domain name next to the link now, so there's nobody but yourself to blame when you get the big red eye

  426. Winmodems by Glanz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The biggest and most prevalent lie I come across is "winmodems are cheaper"... The fact is they are cheaper because M$ insists on encouraging their proliferation to discourage in "a little way" the use of Linux to connect via modem. if makers all used simple UART hard modems internally, they would me even less expensive than so-called soft modems.
    Another good one is, when trying to order a PC without a MicroSlop OS pre-installed: "It's illegal to sell you one like that." And last but not least this is my favorite lie: "Windows is the most stable and secure OS, so why would you want a blank HD?"

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  427. Re: Guns by WD_40 · · Score: 1
    --

    "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -- RFC 1925

  428. Long Distance Phone Companies usually lie by greensquare · · Score: 1

    MCI once called my wife "just to let you know that your long distance service has been fixed, and because of all the trouble we caused you we are going to give you $20. Just say yes to all the questions the auditor asks you..." Of course we didn't have MCI long distance, but we would have had my wife answered yes to all those questions.

    AT&T was very aggresivily marketing their New York Local One Rate Service in my area a while back. Over a 1 year period I got about a dozen sales calls. Half of the sales people were either misleading or lying.

    I spent over an hour on the phone with the first guy. I asked every question twice. And wrote down all the details of his plan. I agreed to sign up because it was a great deal. 6 weeks and 3 or 4 phone calls to AT&T later I found out that it was bogus, and I had been lied to. But I kept track of the actual terms of the plan, so I had them handy when subsequent sales people called.

    One AT&T guy, thought he had me on the hook, because I kept agreeing with him on how great his plan was. When he asked me if I wanted to sign up I told him no. "Why?" he asked. I responded that I thought he was lying to me. He got all pissed off. I told him to call me back in a week, so I could find out if the terms he gave me were correct. His terms were wrong. He was lying. He never called back.

    After a while I relized that AT&T's actual plan was actually competive with my existing Verizon plan. One of the phone sales deals was going to give $50 in cash, and a bunch of long distance minutes. I told the lady how much I like the plan, and how it was going to save me money, but I couldn't sign up. "Why?" Because AT&T is just too sleazy for me.

    I consider MCI, and AT&T to be disreputable companies and will choose not to do business with them if I can. Verizon hasn't lied to me yet. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt for now.

    USADatanet is a great company. I have had great service from them, and absolutely no lies so far.

    1. Re:Long Distance Phone Companies usually lie by exodus2 · · Score: 1

      For long distance you should check out what costco (was Price Club) provides to members. They do it thorugh a comapnay Called TTI national I think. Regular costco members get 6.5 cents per min with no monthy fee, and your are billed in 6 second increments. exceutive members( costs $100, instead of $45) get 5.5 cents per min. It seems to be a really good deal. I called two long distance carriers to compare prices and they were somthign like 19cents a min for longdistance if you dont sign up and have a monthy fee.
      I am just a satisfied customer. But check it out for your longdistance.

      --
      .sigs suck, thus nothing here.
  429. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot viewership would drop by about 85%. I'll bet you don't even use Linux, junior.

  430. Hella Dell... by DarkRecluse · · Score: 1

    Dell promised us that we could standardize on their GX-150 model because they would never change it...since we'd like to image them with ImageCast.

    ...Needless to say they changed the motherboard 3 weeks later to support 1.2GHZ PIII's...

    Oh, and I have to mention that there is no way to tell the difference between the two boards from the post screen, however they require different bios updates and device drivers..

    Oh you're getting Hell...

    Which goes along with my theory...Dells love David Hasselhoff.

    --
    --"It's Bradford Company, slash your last name, dot your first name"
  431. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "This is not necessarily the case. An application may crash because system calls put it in an inconsistant state or corrupt it's memory."

    At first I thought that was the case. And then I tried to run Netscape on NT instead of 9X... *CrAsH*. Then Netscape'd crash on 2k, altho not as often, making me think Windows might be the culprit, right? Well I have friends using Mac and Linux that both say the same thing about Netscape. It sounds to me that they had trouble making it work right. The term 'Nutscrape' was being used commonly.

    Netscape 6.2 has definitely gotten better, though.

    "Furthermore, an application crash should not make the entire system unstable."

    True in 9x, not true in 2K. I have an average uptime, on all my machines, of at least a week. I couldn't do that with NT, I couldn't get 9X to last more than a day. If you saw some of the BS I put my computer through, you'd be amazed.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  432. IBM Salesman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll never outgrow this system...

    By the time all the software they sold us was loaded there was no room for the data, so we immediately had to purchase more storage.

    (IBM System 23).

  433. SLASHDOT, HEAL THYSELF. by mudshark · · Score: 1

    OK. I'm convinced now. The system of moderation on Slashdot is hopelessly broken. A means of winnowing comments and adding value by filtering signal from noise is now responsible for adding even worse noise.

    Come on, folks. A post about tobacco manufacturers' extreme cupidity and criminally disingenuous behavior is VERY MUCH ON TOPIC in a discussion of Vendor Lies. And a rejoinder, however contentious, that cigarettes only kill when people smoke them, is not necessarily flamebait. It's merely an extreme viewpoint. Jeebus.

    Over the years, I've valued Slashdot for its ability to point me toward news that I might not have had the time or inclination to search for. I've enjoyed the discussion of topics, rolled my eyes at the 8th-grade spelling mistakes committed by Cmdr Taco (you know you're barely making it when you run a "news site" and can't even afford a proofreader), actually snickered at the original iterations of trolls such as the Portman and penisbird posts, and have generally believed that moderation was a worthwhile service to bubble-sort the conversations.

    In light of some of the poo that has splattered off the rotating blade recently, it's painfully obvious that the ship is adrift. The Slashdot concept is creaking and groaning under the weight of its own execution. Did the community exceed its critical mass back at UID #300000?

    Pay-per-view is only a reasonable proposal when there is value added to the basic content. All I know is that the value of moderation is being subtracted faster than it's added, and I'd be curious to see if there's any legitimate way to fix it.

    --
    In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
  434. Southwestern Bell Business DSL Saleswoman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After requesting pricing for Business DSL, she gave me two prices. One with Dynamic IP, the other with static. The static was $25/mo additional. I asked, "Why do you charge so much extra for a static IP address?" Her answer..."Static IP addresses make your connection much faster." I replied..."Isn't the service xMb/s either way?" Her reply..."Yes, but the static IP allows it to communcate faster over that xMb/s connection." Tee hee.

    1. Re:Southwestern Bell Business DSL Saleswoman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Telus (Alberta/BC telco)

      They recently switched some of their DSL gear - and now everyone who had a static IP address gets a "static" IP address, doled out via DHCP..

      When asked if they knew what the "D" in DHCP stood for, they replied "no".

      Basically, they're charging more for the privelidge of not tearing your connection out from under you (after the DHCP lease expires, they terminate the connection, and you're forced to renew it.)

      One company that had a /28 subnet had their netblock taken away, and was told they had to use DHCP for all of their machines - when they asked how they're supposed to do this with their firewall, they were told "You don't need a firewall."

  435. Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a reason you don't just get the legal portion of your company to sue them? If what you say is true, it sounds like you could maybe recoup some of the money lost in relying on them while at the same time terminating your service contract neatly...

    1. Re:Quick question by weave · · Score: 1
      Is there a reason you don't just get the legal portion of your company to sue them?

      Our legal department would be the state attorney general's office. Yeah, I'm considering that. It's just a very time consuming affair, time that I don't have. I've threatened them with it recently and hope they agree that for all parties, it's best for all parties to get this matter resolved quickly...

  436. it's simple by abolith · · Score: 1

    Vendor: this ship is unsinkable!

    Buyer: whats it's name?

    Vendor: The Titanic!

    Buyer: Sounds big, I'll take one.

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  437. I always liked... by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    Calls maybe recorded to insure quality control.

    Yeah, record this...

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  438. 56K? Not exactly... by sglane81 · · Score: 1

    Even today, the "blazing fast" (actual adjectives used on boxes) 56K modems can only reach download speeds of 53K. Thanks FCC!

    --
    This is the Internet. You can say "fuck" here. - AC
  439. My Favorite Vendor Lie by Smert · · Score: 1

    A serial cable "Optimized for use with Windows 95". It was only a couple of bucks more than a standard serial cable...

  440. Will it ________ (fill in the blank)? by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    Customer: Will it __________?
    Vendor: Sure, as a matter of fact, not only will it _______ but it will do it far better than our competition! It is easier to do too! Not only that but it does it at a lower overall cost and we have people around to support you when something goes wrong and you can't get it to do what you want!

    Customer: But it costs so much more than the other products we are looking at...
    Vendor: Well Bud, you get what you pay for, I'll admit that there are less expensive products out there but they either won't do what you want them to or, you will have to do so much more work to get from here to there than you will with ours... In the long run, your overall cost with our product will be lower because of increased productivity!

    Customer: Will I need anything else to use it?
    Vendor: Nope, this is all you need. There are some additional optional modules but this is all you need to ________.

    Customer: What about upgrade programs?
    Vendor: We will support the current version out of the box for 30 days. After that time you will need to enter into a support agreement with us for a nominal charge of $__,___.00 per year. This will cover the cost of support packs, version upgrades, and ongoing support (the ongoing support is almost mumbled).

    Customer: What about extra seats? What will they cost me?
    Vendor: We encourage you to buy all the seats that you will need now as this is a one-time price. After this, you will pay the retail price for additional licensing. For (exhorborant sum) you can purchase an enterprise license.

    Customer: Thanks but no thanks.
    Vendor: May I ask why?

    Customer: I get all my software for free. It is called "Open-Source."
    Vendor: (shocked) What? You mean you will trust your business to that crap? Who will support you? How do you know it is safe and reliable? Are you sure there aren't any serious bugs? It is after all amature software! You can't trust a business to this can you?

    Customer: Well, when you put it that way, can I see your source code?

  441. Actually... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

    When the IDE spec first came out, exactly how the master/slave drive negotiation worked wasn't specified. As a result, drive manufacturers had to guess at how to go about implementation, and drives from different manufacturers wouldn't always work together.

    Two drives from the same manufacturer, especially ones built less than a decade ago, should work just fine. :-P

  442. Favorite /. lie by Kalak · · Score: 1

    A Beowolf cluster will do that for you....

    --
    I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
  443. Apple: Does more, costs less. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without doubt the most bald faced tech lie on the planet. Followed by "G4 is a super computer". No one lies like Steve Jobs.

  444. Offtopic: Macrovision vs. VCRs by greed · · Score: 1
    Really, in my experience I only see problems if I try to tape off the DVD.

    It depens on how the monitor circuit is done in the VCR. If the video out is fed a split copy of the input, you're OK. But that's a really useless sort of monitor. More commonly, IME, is the monitor out is done after the AGC, and its the automatic gain control that is affected by Macrovision. (I've never seen a [consumer] VTR that had enough heads to monitor the just-recorded signal like a 3-head audio cassette deck.)

    MacroVision consists in spikes in the signal that occur outside of our ability to see.

    Well, during the horizontal or vertical retrace interval, yes. All it does is confuse the AGC; and it does affect some monitors, like an Amiga 1080.

  445. I worked there by KlfJoat · · Score: 1

    We opened a brand new CompUSA store. During the 30-day training session before the store opened, we were told, and I quote, "the only people who need computer experience are the guys in the tech shop".

    I was 18 at the time, but I had 35-year-old salesmen asking me questions about systems for users, I virtually ran the "upgrades" counter, and I was basically harrassed and kept from doing any of my tech shop work. I was later fired for working on two computers a week. If they had taken some time in those 30 days to teach the other employees about computers, I might have stayed there long enough to quit.

  446. Re:Good point.... by markmoss · · Score: 2

    IIRC, the 6502 took 1 clock to fetch a byte, and the next clock to do something with it. But they overlapped these so most of the time the program ran at 1 clock per byte of program or data. The Z80 could fetch a byte in 3 clocks, but the first byte of an instruction required 5 clocks -- 3 to get the byte, two to decode. And this wasn't overlapped. Averaging out the way this impacted instructions of various length, the Z80 had to be clocked 3 to 4 times as fast to match the 6502. OTOH, when the 6502 was available in 1 MHz only, the Z80 could clocked 8 MHz (twice as fast), if you wanted to pay the premiums for "fast" RAM and ROM... But the real test was in overall system performance as it seemed to the operator -- and the 1MHz 6502 Apple allegedly beat anything else in it's price range. If you needed real power you laid out much more for a fast Z80 system with all the trimmings, and the CPM OS.

  447. Development Outsourcing Company by MopOfJustice · · Score: 1

    My manager was told 'we currently have some projects that are CMM level three!' As my manager pointed out, such ratings are for an organization, not a project!

    --
    ----------- Sig what?
  448. Nexland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    About three years ago, my company needed to get some small NAT boxes to install into college dorms to provide internet access. We heard a good review of the Nexland ISB2Lan product from a friend who had used it in smaller installations. We installed several of them during spring break and our tests went well. But when the students showed up the next week, many of them couldn't get connected. After much experimentation, we discovered that the ISB2Lan DHCP server had a hard-coded limit of serving only 20 IP addresses (I think that was it, I can't remember the exact number for sure, but it was extremely small). This surprised me greatly because their documentation had the following (and this is an exact quote because I found it on archive.org):
    What is the ISB2LAN 's best advantage ?

    Allowing an unlimited number of users on a LAN to simultaneously access the Internet using only one IP address and one cable modem without experiencing any decrease in the speed of their access (2.5 meg effective) and above all with total firewall security.

    Is there a limit to the number of user's ?

    There is NO LIMIT to the number of users that can simultaneously connect to the Internet at the same time with the ISB2LAN, even if you are using a Motorola or Com21 cable modem that itself is limited to 8 users with static IP addresses.

    The cute thing was, the configuration utility allowed you to put in however many addresses you wanted served that you wanted, but it still only did 20. Of course I called and emailed and bawled them out as much as I could. I didn't really get a good response for a few days. I finally sent a nasty-gram directly accusing them of fraud. That did get me a response from a VP, but he basically told me they couldn't do anything. They did give me an upgrade to the software that upped the limit a little bit (I think it was to 50). We had to go out and buy another brand to replace them. And they wouldn't give us a refund.

    I notice that their current products no longer say they have "NO LIMIT". They say they can support up to 253 computers. I hope I had something to do with that. But I won't be buying any of their products ever again.

  449. Canadian English is better English by DarklordJonnyDigital · · Score: 1
    Surely, some copies of the original version of this episode of Megatokyo exist:

    "Neverwinter nights will be released soon. We promise!"

  450. Re:Good point.... by sjames · · Score: 2

    are being sold as things that they are NOT.

    Actually, the numbers match decently.

    Which is the bigger lie, selling a CPU with a number that attempts to give a rough equivilence to the numbers the other guy uses (apples to apples) even though it's bigger than your MHz numbers, or hyping that your MHz is bigger than their MHz even though you know it has no bearing on the comparative performance (apples to oranges).

  451. VSS by marble · · Score: 1

    Sourcesafe. 'Nuff said.

  452. No Single Points of Failure by Wanker · · Score: 2

    Funny, I always seem to find the "one point" that they missed.

  453. 2200 tape Re:...record them to tape by n1vux · · Score: 1

    No, the Wang 2200 was a desktop; no 8", no card-reader. (You're thinking Wang Word Processing for the 8" and Wang VS for card?)

    On the Wang 2200, it was Cassette Tape ... higher grade tiny mechancial bits and medium than the audio cassette, but same form-factor. Tape drive was integrated and controled, a blocked device, not outboard streaming like on the early hobby computers.

    The 2200 later had an optional harddrive, who knows how small, we're talking 1970's here. It might have had an 8" floppy option, never saw one, but not 5.25".

    There was very little off-the-shelf software before the flourishing of CPM. So the druggist was SOL unless he hired a Consultant or a kid to program it. Only a few years later, CPM provided niche software and nearly commodity hardward, but not binary compatible, no standard BIOS yet.

    -- Bill

  454. Java "portability" by mjul · · Score: 1

    I've got four words for you: "Write once, run anywhere."

    Come on, Sun, it's not that hard to deliver on that promise. The Perl and Python communities have done it for years...

  455. Oracle asks: teach my reps to lie by free_at_last · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Back in the spring of 1999, I had an e-commerce site that was showing promise but needed a more sophisticated shopping cart program. An Oracle rep promised me that if I spent $62K on their iStore e-commerce package, it would meet all my stringent requirements -- and I could install it myself with a little help from a CS student. And if I bought it at by the approaching end of the fiscal year, I'd save $80K, because the prices were going up.

    I sent Oracle almost all of the money I'd saved to start the business. My delighted rep then asked me to speak to the Oracle quarterly meeting of top sales reps to help them get to know the small dot-com customers. He wanted his colleagues to be able to help other startups like he'd helped me. I was hoping to become an Oracle PosterGrrl -- and thus attract investors, partners, and customers.

    I spent a couple days preparing a talk, flew to Boston, and told 400 reps and managers about my company and why I'd chosen Oracle's iStore. My favorite slide was one showing a bungalow and a half -- because I had just written Oracle a check worth 150% of my first house. And I had gotten a mortgage to pay for the house!

    As I talked, I could see some of those shining faces showing more and more concern. Afterwards, an Oracle consulting rep told me I'd really need his team's help because no one had EVER installed the package they'd sold me without extensive help from their consulting branch. He estimated I needed another $100K. I had less than $10K left.

    I flew home with the stunned feeling that Oracle had taken my money with the knowledge that this act would immediately drive me out of business.

    A few weeks later, the prices did go up and the package I had bought completely disappeared from their website. Oracle wouldn't refund my money or apply it to other purchases when it became obvious I couldn't use iStore. And the last I'd heard, my accountant was still trying to get them to reimburse me for my hotel and meal expenses as promised. I wound up selling my company to get enough funding to continue.

    So Larry Ellison, please feel free to send me a check for $62,259. And the rest of you, don't make the mistake I did in thinking that Oracle wants to help you grow so they can profit from a long-term relationship. They just want to devour your seed corn.

    1. Re:Oracle asks: teach my reps to lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'm not defending Oracle here, The buyer has a responsibility to research companies and products before investing their money. It would have been in the best interest of the customer (you) to have multiple vendors bidding on this and getting references (accounts) of the product in use (with contact names so you could verify the claims) prior to spending any money. Ouch.

    2. Re:Oracle asks: teach my reps to lie by free_at_last · · Score: 1
      You are absolutely right that research is the key. I did spend about three months researching the various possibilities. I had a functional spec with weighted requirements. I went to trade shows, visited websites, and saw demo sites. My systems guy and I probably spent five hours validating our assumptions with the Oracle technical staff before I wrote the Big Check.

      What I didn't count on was:

      • Oracle sales reps and technical reps outright lying. For example, in response to questions about whether I could implement iStore with my then-current infrastructure & incredibly limited resources, they said "Yes, no problem!" How long will it take? "Turnkey! Created for the small-business customer!" Gosh, no wonder they were the leader in a set of eight serious contenders!
      • Not realizing that the key to breaking through the vendor lies is to find at least two independent sources who have already done what you are trying to do.

      One of my weaknesses here was to assume that Oracle did the sort of testing and validation before releasing a product that was SOP when I was a developer at IBM. Another one was to assume that, while Oracle might put a positive spin on everything, they wouldn't simply make things up.

      Admittedly, it's an embarassing "ouch" to have made such a big and expensive mistake. I tell this tale with the hopes that it will help someone else. I had other dealing with Oracle later and found that this behavior was the rule rather than the exception.

  456. Size Does Matter... by OmniGeek · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Sure I can. It's got a pair of LM386 ICs, held on with dull-gray blobs of solder on a printed circuit board that looks like the layout was done by a Parkinsons patient's left hand. Components will be skewed on the board, held in place only by cold solder joints. You might find it's actually built of discrete parts; I don't know and I don't care - but I assure you that there won't even be anything as substantial as a TDA2002 in them, despite the 250W claim.

    Yep. And don't forget the REEAL simple power test: how BIG is the unit? Acoustically-good audio systems ted NOT to be extremely power-efficient, but even if it's relatively power-efficient, that means 50% or so at best, meaning that the box gotta DISSIPATE on the order of 250 watts, which means it has to have some size to it in order to get rid of that heat. I bet it doesn't even have a heatsink...

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  457. Re: Fortunate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "No doubt you're going to tell us now that $60 is an inisgnificant amount to you too, well bully for you, some of us aren't so fortunate."

    I am sick and tired or people referring to successful people as "fortunate," as though those people were born into a pre-determined set of life circumstances, and everything was simply handed to them, no effort required.

    Fuck you, and your class-warfare driven bullshit. Fact is, most people that are financially successful have earned their success. It is the result of hard work, and/or good decision making.

    I realize that this was hardly the point of your post, and agree that you are entitled to everything that was promised you...

    Still, I'm sick and tired of the whole "victim of circumstance" song and dance.

    Life's hard... Wear a fuckin' helmet.

  458. Linux is ready for the desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the biggest lie.

  459. [ot] Re:SLASHDOT, HEAL THYSELF. by dagoalieman · · Score: 2

    Why thank you!! Good to see someone out there has a clue about Slashdot- discuss stuff, whatever it may be (hopefully on topic), and allow everyone their opinion.

    I wasn't trying to be extemist or anything, just merely pointing out that there's a group effort for ciggarettes to kill- people to make them, advertise them, smoke them, continue smoking them, etc.

    The crap flood is starting to get annoying, I agree, and the moderator system is getting to be a pain in the ass... Personally, I think we ought to get 10 moderation points. 5 of them for troll/offtopic/flamebait/dumbass (IE weed out frist posts, penis birds, gotse's, etc. Natlie is OK, if used appropriately in context, and is a new one. :)) and 5 positive, to get the good ones out there.

    Then make the metamoderation mean something- a little more careful scrutinization of moderations, a nice form-letter email to those who slightly don't get the idea (IE this flamebait issue.. it was flamebait, I admit, but I thought it added more to the conversation than the flames..), and $rbtl the idiots who crapflood then mod it up. Start killing the idiots out there, let them post AC. ACs are all but ignored by me.

    Of course, any other suggestions to wake up the system are appreciated. But thanks for your support, at least! Glad to see I'm not the only one who wants discussion out there about whatever topics we may roam to, and all opinions accepted (even if I don't agree with them.)

    --
    We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
  460. Windows 1.0 by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

    On phone with MS (back when you could call them, long ago) -

    "Yes, this does preemptive tasking."

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  461. IBM Minicomputer Salesman by Degrees · · Score: 1
    Over the last two decades, I have seen co-workers or acquaintences purchase six different IBM minicomputer systems (System/3x through AS/400). Every single time, the box was half as powerful as it needed to be. It seems, that to compete against the HP minis, the IBM guy would quote a (too-) small box, because then his price quote came in cheaper. He often won the quote.

    He knew that after the box was put in production (months and many man-hours into the implementation) - people would pay for a hardware upgrade instead scrapping, restarting and switching to HP.

    The last time we had to buy hardware, we doubled our expected demand on the box, just to get the real answer from the IBM salesman.

    For some strange reason, all our new system platforms are Intel based....

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  462. A car dealer story by bbqBrain · · Score: 1

    I'm a bit late into the fray here, but this is one of my favorites. A coworker of mine used to work at a car dealership here in St. Louis (I'd have no problem mentioning the name, if I could only remember it). He did some kind of office or clerical work, but his desk was within earshot of a salesperson's. On with the story...

    One day, a young couple came in, test drove a V-8 Camaro (or some F-body), and decided they really wanted one. Unfortunately, the dealer didn't have a V-8 in their preferred color. They did, however, have a V-6. Realizing that this was an impulse purchase and not wanting to lose the naive customers, he said something like, "Here's what we'll do: I'll sell you this V-6 here today at the V-8 price. We'll schedule a time next week for you to drop it off at the shop, and I'll have our mechanics install the other two cylinders."

    They bought it.

    --

    One of the reasons that I became a lawyer was to avoid ever having to hire one. -SPYvSPY
  463. Hmmm.. by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    Im somewhat comfused with the findings. They say that this device can reduce the effect of gravity acting upon an object (decrease the weight), but then later in the article, they mention "The Podkletnov effect suggests it may be possible to effectively reduce the mass of the ship..." ....so what is the actual effect?

    If it looses weight... it could simply be a shield from gravity... and it would not effect mass at all... but how exactly could this change the mass of an object?

  464. Compression on 4mm tape drives by oualline · · Score: 1

    I once talked to a vendor that sold 8mm tape
    drives, but hadn't gotten around to selling
    the new (at the time) 4mm tape drives.

    He told me that the 8mm drives were better
    because you could compress the data on an
    8mm tape drive, but couldn't do that on a 4mm
    drive because the bits were too small.

  465. No Single Points of Failure on EMC Arrays by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all. Their cache is a SPOF. You lose the master cache card, you are dead.

  466. Only vendor interoperable device on the market by svindler · · Score: 1

    I once attended a presentation of Shiva VPN Gateway back when VPNs was hot news.
    The presenter, who was supposed to be the most technically competent Shiva engineer in all the Scandinavian countries, told us that the Shiva device was the ONLY device on the market capable of connecting to VPN devices from other vendors!

  467. [OT] Re:Song: "The Reviewer" by GregWebb · · Score: 1

    OK, I've read that and I've read Seth's site. I know neither except by those sites so I'm not commenting on either personally, I'm in no position to do so.

    But I'm still not quite sure what Michael achieved by taking the site down like that. That one step baffles me.

    Anyone?

    --

    Greg

    (Inside a nuclear plant)
    Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  468. Re:We make a secure Operating System (OT) by xmedar · · Score: 1

    Well done Bill, actually I was involved with the UK side of the operation, a long time ago, hence the the nome de plume and the low user ID, the NASDAQ delisting was unsurprising, we saw it coming after Freddy was dumped on the UK side, it was just a matter of time before things fell apart, and I see Frank has another company now. Anyway, its nice to make your aquaintence.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
  469. This software is soooo good . . . . . . by todd_r_townsnd · · Score: 1

    I recently got a call from a 'dude' from Microsoft. He was selling some e-commerce, website, and inventory application. I tried to be really nice, but then he said "Our software is sooo good, we have people using it that don't even have websites!" I thought about asking him to explain that, but opted for hanging up on him.

    TrT

  470. Let's try to get killed by Pierre+Phaneuf · · Score: 1
  471. Re:My Vote: How is this funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh. Were it not for my extremely quick reflexes, I would have been goatse.cx'd. Nice try.

  472. From the back of comic books by buck_wild · · Score: 1

    Remember those flying machines in the back of comic books? They'd sell you a rack of wood to cut and put together, and all you had to do was find a vacuum cleaner to inert and voila! You're flying!

    --
    If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  473. Re: Guns by Kerinsky · · Score: 1

    This is like argueing which is a more important part of a car the tires on the right side or the tires on the left. The tires on each side are vitally important.

    Three facts:

    1) People kill people without guns.

    2) People kill people with guns.

    3) Guns don't often kill people without the interaction of a human.

    --

    Damnit I AM acting my age. I'm 15 in hex!

  474. DVD through VCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, you can't play your DVD through a VCR (you have to buy a separate RF modulator) but for a different reason: the DVD puts out a Macrovision-distorted signal, which the VCR is built to not be able to record. Unfortunately, it also can't pass the signal on to your tv!

  475. Good point by scubacuda · · Score: 1
    You brought up many good points.

    Kind of reminds me of the dilbert comic where he talks about abusing sales people as it is the one thing he can do in his life where its ok to be rude and demeaning to people(some sales people desirve it).


    That's one of my favorite strips, also. I am not normally a bitter person, but too many of the clowns that I work with bring out these traits in me. I am in a difficult position, because I too am a sales engineer. My job depends on their success, but I often think that the worse thing that could happen is if they do succeed and think that such behavior is merrited in the real world (or any other parallel universe for that matter!)

    On a side note, the reason salespeople act the way they do for the most part is because it works. I always treated everyone with respect, but the salesguy constantly calls you once you express interest to force you to move on it else you forget or get distracted with something else (in sales your job is always on the line, sales is usually the first staff to get cut when times start to go bad).


    I am extremely bothered by the leeway that many sales reps get in an organization (perhaps it's their compensation for being the first who are cut!). While I think that a large part of each sales commission should go to the sales rep who found the opportunity, it seems as if they are getting away with *more* things than the average engineer (such as expensing their own meals with each other). Engineers, in my experience, are FAR more likely to talk about work-related details outside of work. We thrive on details!

    If you wan't to get the real deal on anything, go speak with the applications engineer who supports the sales staff, they will usually give you an idea of the true capabilities of the product. Never trust the marketing guy, he will stretch the truth far more than the sales staff.


    This is what I do. First thing I ask for is their engineering counterpart's contact info. I immediately e-mail him/her with my questions, ask for white papers, etc. I only go back to the sales goon when I have specific $$$ questions regarding licensing and/or discounts.

    Let's face it: most sales reps are parrots. They just "relay" information from customer to someone on the inside...from someone on the inside to customer. They're just a conduit that too often degrades the information as it passes through.

    Lastly, if you are an engineer who can write and talk well and likes working with people, try sales or applications engineering at somepoint in your career. The money is VERY good. Besides you can always go back to your old job.


    Agreed. There is a tremendous need for technical people who can make technology easy-to-use and non-threatening for the general public.

    Perhaps the only thing that I hate *worse* than a sales goon is a techie is condenscending to those who aren't "in the know".

    I unfortuantely see this type of mentality all the time with the IT fuckwads I've worked with. Perhaps it's because they realize that their MS certs will expire. (Then instead of being a dime a dozen, they will be a penny a dozen!)
    1. Re:Good point by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps the only thing that I hate *worse* than a sales goon is a techie is condenscending to those who aren't "in the know".

      I unfortuantely see this type of mentality all the time with the IT fuckwads I've worked with. Perhaps it's because they realize that their MS certs will expire. (Then instead of being a dime a dozen, they will be a penny a dozen!) "

      Part of the problem I have found with IT people is that they are technichians and not engineers or computer scientists. That doesnt make them bad or stupid people, it is that they usually aren't as educated (didn't finish college or have an associates degree)and don't seem to realize that lording over people because they precieve them to be stupid or ill informed, is a bad idea. It really isn't a wise move to call your CEO an idiot to his face if you are on the IT support staff ( i heard stories of this back in my sales days). The only thing I can think of why some of these guys have that attitude is that they are insecure, and like in the dilbert cartoon, this is the only area in their lives where they can exert their will over others. It is kind of sad really.

      At least having a technical degree from a university is still going to be worth something 20 years from now, whereas the latest certification won't be worth #@$ 10 years from now.The thing about sticking it out and getting your degree is that you have the self discipline and patence to go for the long haul instead of trying to go for the quick money.

      On a side note, anyone ever notice that DeVry and the like don't really advertise for things like electrical or HVAC repair anymore? It seems like they are going the IT support route now adays.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    2. Re:Good point by scubacuda · · Score: 1
      Part of the problem I have found with IT people is that they are technichians and not engineers or computer scientists.

      At these places, you are taught *only* bits of information, not a scientific method, process, etc. I also think that people who attended these programs fell victim to the hype that surrounded them ("I got my MCSE and now I make $75K/year! Thank you Microskills!") They get out, realize that goons (like me!) are making way more than they are (and I don't even have an MCSE!) and then get bitter and discouraged. The only way that they can vent this frustration is to take it out on a CEO who forgot his password.

      I look at all these Microsoft Academies as the equivalent to working construction (back when I was in high school). The guys I knew who worked construction instead of going to high school and college always bragged about how they had money for girls, cars, etc. Now look at them now. :/
  476. Look at Nokia's CryptoCluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The sales people at a place I used to work (doesn't exist anymore) stopped selling our most popular product and instead tried to sell stuff we didn't know how to make. Who on earth ever told them that was a good idea?

    Just look at Nokia's CryptoCluster 2500. It got excellent reviews, but they canned it. Some say that it's because it competes with Check Point NG high availability solution.

    Many of our customers (I work for a VAR) got really pissed when they heard this. What am I supposed to do? I then have no other option but recommend that they go look for other vendors that will be around to support them?
  477. Sales feedback by scubacuda · · Score: 1
    At the same time, these sales idiots can really help out a floundering company.

    This is a really good point. There has to be someone hitting the streets, seeing what the demand is for a product. (This is perhaps engineering's weakest spot: they often don't think about what someone using this for the first time might think. It's hard to take criticism on something that you've put a lot of hours into.)

    I think that the best type of person for this job is one who knows all the technical limitations before suggesting something. In other words, if someone wants a certain functionality, they know ahead of time a ballpark figure of how much time it will take to add that.


    Don't know what your direction is? Well, who's the one talking to the people who make decisions at the companies making contracts with you? The sales guy knows what your customers want to hear your product does...so you might as well just make it do it.


    Knowing WHAT your customer wants to hear is an invaluable skill. But you've got to use it for *good* instead of *evil*. Make sure that that functionality is actually IN the product. Take the time to write up what the customer said, as well as what other functions they liked in *other* vendors.

    It takes a certain type of sales person to inform everyone why they've lost these types of opportunities. Very few I've dealt with have taken the time to do so. Too many have the attention span of a 3 year old and don't consider giving those who support them the valuable feedback.


    Of course, development of this type is totally unsupportable and encoruages the worst design imaginable. But it keeps you in business to strike with a really great product when you finally figure out what it is you want to do.

    For companies to remain sharp and nimble, they HAVE to find novel ways of differentiating their products. Having a solid mechanism for customer/sales feedback in place is a good way to stay ahead of the curve.

    Thanks for responding to my post!
  478. AT&T cable has a barrel of them by zer0*ryok0 · · Score: 1

    in chat support
    "we are sorry for the inconveniance"

    on the web
    "No known service interruptions in this area as of 03/26/2002 01:59:36 AM EST"

    --
    the only fact is that everything is an opinion
  479. This isn't outrageous... Just stupid.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some dumb guy from an XBox exhibit said XBox uses TRI-layer DVDs... Maybe if the guy knew anything about optical media.......

  480. Re:Forgetting the most important ... TRUTH at last by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Admission of causing Incredible Painful Computing
    Telling the truth at last......
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  481. Re:His name was Xenu. (not even Ming) by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Bah! Even Ming the Merciless was no match for Flash Gordon.
    (And Flash Gordon was there in silver underwear - Claude Reins was the Invisible Man...)

    "I remember, doing the Time-Warp.....It's just a step to the left"
    "Then a step to the r-r-r-right"
    "Put your hands on your hips"
    "Then do a pelvic thrust"

    ....
    ...

    "Lets do the Time-Warp again......"
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  482. Re:Microsoft Lies?????? by vortexau · · Score: 1
    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  483. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    for 17 pppl? man, most admins i know are on a ratio 1 admin to 100-150 users
    I know it's hard for some people to believe that companies don't start off with 100-150 employees, or maybe they have small, efficient branch offices.

    Anyway, back to the topic, I recall occasionally doing some "assistant administration" in a small office. This meant that normally the system ran itself, but when it didn't, someone senior appointed themselves to fix it, but usually had no clue, which meant I had to step in.

    (and ensure the NT servers had a full set of cygwin daemons running while I was at it)

  484. Re:Good point.... by CTalkobt · · Score: 1

    Nope - if you look at the cycle times for NOP ( no operation ) you'll see it takes 2 cycles. This was a fundamental design in the 6502 specifically because of the fetch / write cycle it has.

    The base 6502 was not overlapped.

    Goto www.6502.org and there's some cycle/opcode charts you can verify.

    The z80 was so slow because of the immense overhead per instruction.

    --
    There's a gorilla from Manilla whose a fella that stinks of vanilla and has salmonella.
  485. AMD isn't Apple by cakoose · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, AMD doesn't have the marketing muscle or horde of fanatic, retarded consumer's that Apple does. Apple somehow convinced it's drones to start chanting "Megahertz doesn't matter" and later to double the G4 megahertz when comparing to x86 chips.

    It really sucks that there is no standard benchmarking technique for processors with practically the same instruction set. While benchmarks can be misleading, I'm sure that they are (on average) better then pure megahertz numbers. Of course then there's the problem of not being able to benchmark the chip by itself...

  486. Re:Good point.... by cakoose · · Score: 1

    Does anybody remember when Intel tried to leverage the P2's image off of the average idiot's perception of the Internet. All their ads said that the P2 "let's you unleash the power of the internet". This was way back when most people still used dialup (when the bottleneck was definitely not the processor). Most sites still use plain old HTML (as opposed to the much hyped VRML) for everything.

  487. AOL by a landslide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1000 free hours.

  488. Directional? by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    Directional, shmectional. The only time directional matters is when you're hooking up sewer pipes. Shit rolls downhill.

    In an audio system, you're dealing with AC in your signal lines, and in AC you don't have electrons flowing from point A to point B. It's more of an oscillation. That means the electrons are going both directions.

    If you've got a cable that "sounds better" in one direction than the other, you don't have a cable, you have a diode. But more likely you have a weak connection somewhere.

    As for "oxygen free" or gold-plated connectors, all that does is tell your friends "look how much money I have to waste." An audiophile friend of mine made speaker cables out of TELEPHONE WIRE and they sound just as good as the thousand-dollar-a-foot-silver-wire-blah-blah cables the golden-fleece store wanted to sell him. And he's got a golden ear.

    Someone mentioned the Belkin gold-plated telephone line cord for your modem. Granted, the gold-plated isn't going to do a lot for you, but the cord DOES have twisted-pair inside (the grey flat line cord doesn't). The twisting resists electrical interference, and there's a lot of it in the rat's nest behind your computer. Of course, this only benefits you if your premises wiring is twisted pair AND the telco wiring down the street is, too. I have seen it make a difference.

    A gold plated sewer pipe doesn't make your shit smell any better. ;-)

    Onto another rant, why does a stinkin' Belkin USB cable cost 20 bucks? Anyplace that sells Belkin seems to only sell Belkin, and that's anyplace that is a chain. I go over to my hole-in-the-wall screwdriver shop and they've got a no-name cable that's just as good for 6 bucks. What's up with that?

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    1. Re:Directional? by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      I didn't mention the actual reason for the 'directional cable' in my previous post. It seems that the 'direction' is there to indicate which side of the cable the shielding is connected to. It's common practice to disconnect the shielding at once end of a cable in certain instances to alleviate ground loop hum. The shielding still shields RF, but noise-carrying current won't flow between equipment. This is only a solution for a balanced signal. Usually it just indicates that your setup has poor grounding to start with, or that you've got a poorly designed piece of equipment somewhere. Sometimes it is very necessary, like in some temporary live sound reinforcement installations, where you can't go through and optimize ground paths.

      Still pretty rediculous, though.

      ~Loren

  489. speaker ratings, not amplifier ratings by unitron · · Score: 2
    What that number means is that the speakers can withstand 250 Watts for about one-millionth of a second. Any longer than that, of course, and the voice coil vaporizes. :-)

    Amplifiers are often misleadingly advertised as well. I used to sell consumer audio stuff back in the '70s and trying to explain to the non-technically minded the differences between peak, peak to peak, instantaneous peak to peak, RMS, IHF, peak music power, and the acronym of the week was a major occupational hazard.

    By the way, that's RMS as in root-mean-square, not that other RMS. Trying to explain him to potential customers would have been an adventure I'd just as soon have done without.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  490. offtopic moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the fuck? doesn't the moderator understand that its directly related?

  491. New Comp Woes by bongpig · · Score: 1

    From HARVEY NORMAN Australia, Conversation with Salesperson for A computer i paid AUD $3000 for, "Of course you get a WindowsME CD" And then on Calling Harvey Norman enquiring about where my CD is.. "You are not entitled to it" Then they went and did it to my sister with XP!!!!!

  492. Amway by bongpig · · Score: 1

    How about this one... "Do you want to make some extra money??" "Have you ever hard of Amway?"

  493. Digital Cameras by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    I had a camera store salesman tell me that JPEG is higher quality than TIFF, and why would I want to use TIFF, it just takes up more space on the memory chip?

    This salesman is an accomplished photographer. Any questions on traditional film photography he can answer correctly. He's a valuable resource in that respect. But when it comes to computers and digital photography, he is absolutely clueless.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  494. Finally! An Easy To Configure Router! by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

    But it would be interesting to see if you can see my comp through the router because according to the manual the way I have it setup should prevent you from contacting my machine directly.

    Hey Tom. I know the manual you're talking about. It's the roughly-translated-from-the-Taiwanese manual on waxy paper which was packaged with your router when you bought it at Network Supply on Colonnade.

    Yeah, big companies spend millions of dollars a year attempting to hack-proof their infrastructure, but I-can't-pronounce-it-in-English-Router-Company-of- Taipei has come up with a remarkably easy-to-configure router:

    "Router have two mode: USEFUL an SECURE. On front panel adjacent to power switch, please to find large chrome toggle switch and turn it to whichever direction serves your needs. This conclude security configuration instruction. Enjoy meditation: Blade of grass that bends with wind will bring thousand happiness to potter who also breeds chickens. Thank you and best wishes from I-can't-pronounce-it-in-English-Router-Company-of- Taipei."

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  495. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by geekoid · · Score: 2

    I can crash win2k with edit.
    repeatably.
    No OS should ever go down because an application crashes. Ever.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  496. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "I can crash win2k with edit."

    Sounds like you have a shitty computer. You really shouldn't buy a Compaq and then blame Windows for it being unstable. ;)

    Meanwhile... my computer, which has been up for well over a week, is running Lightwave (Both LW Apps: Layout and MOdeler), Photoshop with an image I haven't saved yet, Opera which is not really all that stable (still tolerable, though...) Winamp, Kazaa, Outlook, and all on a Dual Monitor setup.

    Sounds to me that Windows 2000 is doing pretty damn good. Could Linux do better? Perhaps. That's not the focus of this debate. The debate was that MS said that Win2k provided greater stability. It did. Case closed. You cannot argue that it didn't. It's over. I win.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  497. Re: Fortunate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, and your class-warfare driven bullshit. Fact is, most people that are financially successful have earned their success. It is the result of hard work, and/or good decision making.

    Life's hard... Wear a fuckin' helmet.



    How much did your helmet cost? Could I afford it? I love it when pointing out gross discrepancies in income levels (IOW, stating a fact) is labeled as "class warfare". Is pointing out that some people have lighter skin than others racism? Is pointing out that some people don't eat pork religious hatred?

    Let's say some Enron exec got a USD $1,000,000 bonus last year and my bonus was USD $100. Following your crude logic, that exec is ten thousand times harder-working than I am. Care to explain how one man can do that much more work in the same time period? You make the mistake of assuming that the US economy and meritocracy are co-extensive when they clearly are not.

    capitalism exploits...get a fuckin' clue.

  498. Not how it's advertised and S/PDIF won't interfere by andaru · · Score: 2
    It is advertised to protect the pristine cleanliness of your perfect digital signal.

    Anyway, interference problems in your analog cables are much more likely to come from cables which are carrying some real power. S/PDIF doesn't transfer any power for devices, just signal (which, on the wire, would be a low power analog signal putting out no more interference than an RCA cable carrying a line level). So if you needed shielding to prevent your digital signal from interfering on your analog cable, you would need just as much shielding to prevent your analog signal from interfering with other analog cables.

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

  499. Re:Not how it's advertised and S/PDIF won't interf by sigwinch · · Score: 2
    It is advertised to protect the pristine cleanliness of your perfect digital signal.
    That's just silly. As long as you operate your microwave oven with the door closed, there won't be much problem.
    S/PDIF doesn't transfer any power for devices, just signal (which, on the wire, would be a low power analog signal putting out no more interference than an RCA cable carrying a line level).
    I haven't read the specification, but it probably carries an approx. 2.4MHz digital signal. Which means it will have significant sinewave harmonics out to 10-20MHz. Which means that a single poorly soldered connection at an RCA connector can screw up radio and TV reception, even if it still seems to work.

    That's for the good stuff. If the equipment is poorly designed, it could easily have digital noise and harmonics out to hundreds of MHz. If you've done much entertainment center stuff, you've probably come across a cheap CD player or similar that screws up TV reception--I've come across several. Hostile equipment like that is why I recommend using good coax cables for digital. (Good doesn't necessarily mean expensive, but I try to avoid the cheapest cables.) It's far easier to prevent noise problems than it is to diagnose and fix them after they occur.

    --

    --
    Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)