Slashdot Mirror


Spyware Removal: Drop PC in Dumpster

morganx writes "The New York Times is reporting that some users prefer throwing out their PCs and buying new ones to actually removing their spyware. Does this mean lots of free hardware for the dumpster-divers among us?"

705 comments

  1. Cheaper? by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

    I find people disposing affected PCs highly irresponsible. Would someone think of those homeless children who dumpster-dived and brought home (or somewhere whatever) such PC? It's like throwing out old smoke alarm with perfectly good Uranium bits inside, someone's going to get hurt.

    The friendly article mentioned that "people are increasingly unwilling to take out their 'software tweezers' to clean their machines", maybe it's time for manufacturers to install a HardReset button (like in a PDA) with a 1 GB ReadOnly Flash drive, which resets everything back to factory.

    1. Re:Cheaper? by Leiterfluid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, how difficult is it to just do a basic OS install, and build from there. Or, as you suggest, use the recovery media from the manufacturer. I want to know who these morons are that are having their systems infected so quickly, and so often. I have a PC at home that is running Windows XP, that hasn't had a clean rebuild on it since I originally installed Windows 98 on it. I went straight from 98 to XP, and have never had a significant problem with viruses, adware, or anything else of that ilk. If it did happen, I'd be more prone to performing a fresh reinstall rather than throwing it away.

    2. Re:Cheaper? by emidln · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think it's pretty damn difficult. As a coder and techie, I cannot figure out how to install Windows XP on my only computer capable of running it. Windows just blue-screens while trying to format the hard drive. I assume it needs drivers for my SATA chipset, since my computer is newer than XP SP2, but my PC doesn't have a floppy drive, space for a floppy drive, or a power cable for a floppy drive. I'm tempted to read up on what kind of power a floppy takes and wire a floppy drive up to an external power source and connect it to the fdc (mobo supports the floppy, power supply doesn't). Oh, and Windows will not treat my usb floppy drive as an A: drive during the install, which is the only place where it will accept drivers from.

    3. Re:Cheaper? by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 0

      the problem is not hte reset button; it is easy enough for a minimaly competent person to wipe and reinstall with the right disk
      the problem is all the changes since you bought the machine, particularly all the 3rd party software you installed, adn for which you no longer have disks, or passwords or whatever. not to mention all the upgrades to get your 3 year old card or whatever to work - where on earth do you find all that stuff
      just recovering your bookmarks could take hours if you don't know how to make sure the exported bookmarks file is clean.

    4. Re:Cheaper? by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

      Worse than that $400 + $100 for someone to migrate the data vs. $100 for someone to remove the spyware using generally available tools (including regedit) or at worst, back up your data, reformat, reinstall.

      It's like throwing out old smoke alarm with perfectly good Uranium bits inside, someone's going to get hurt.

      I think you mean Americium, but same analogy works to a point. Actually throwing out the computer is probably quite a bit worse.

      The friendly article mentioned that "people are increasingly unwilling to take out their 'software tweezers' to clean their machines", maybe it's time for manufacturers to install a HardReset button (like in a PDA) with a 1 GB ReadOnly Flash drive, which resets everything back to factory.

      Hmm..... I think sending a Knoppix CD with every PC purchased would be a good start, actually.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    5. Re:Cheaper? by simcop2387 · · Score: 3, Informative

      it takes the exact same power as the other drives, though it'd be prudent to look up which order they are, i don't have them memorized

    6. Re:Cheaper? by sarob · · Score: 0

      I have a bunch of old systems that I need to dispose of properly. Is a pain, but I would never think of putting a monitor or a motherboard in the dump. I guess some people still dump their old auto oil in the storm drain. sigh...

    7. Re:Cheaper? by Casca · · Score: 1

      Until M$ releases an OS that doesn't have enough vulnerable services turned on by default to get infected inside of 10 minutes, factory default gets you nowhere...

      --
      Casca
    8. Re:Cheaper? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the power leads, red is 5V and yellow is 12V, for both floppy and hard disks.

    9. Re:Cheaper? by heov · · Score: 1

      if you dont' have the sata drivers you can't even see the hd to choose which partiton to choose from- so that's not the issue. and yes, you have a real floppy drive connected to the FDC. if it's blue screen during format your HD is either messed up or yoru disk is messed up or some other component, it is highly unlikely it's the drivers since you dont' have a floppy drive (and thus must be running in IDE mode so you woudln't need drivers anyway).

    10. Re:Cheaper? by B'Trey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see. And throwing out the PC and buying a new one solves this problem exactly how?

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    11. Re:Cheaper? by Michalson · · Score: 2, Informative

      All you need is a moltex to floppy adapter (it's basically the same cable, only with a different connector). For example here is one for $1.69.

    12. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, you played the "wont someone please think of the children" card and you even got modded doing it!

    13. Re:Cheaper? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      They did use to do this, with a hidden disk partition. Techies complained about not being able to restore to a configuration of their choosing (the partition contained an OEM bundle) and not having access to xx% of the hard disk, and retailers dropped it.

    14. Re:Cheaper? by sarob · · Score: 0

      As Windows XP SP2 has locked down firewall by default your wish has been granted.

    15. Re:Cheaper? by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

      you may be right. On the other hand, if you are usng windows 98 or 2000, and have a wireless card, and a external cd or dvd burner, etc, spending (not 400) but 600 may in fact relieve you of many software headaches

    16. Re:Cheaper? by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

      Rather, it's either pay $100 to get the same two-year old machine back, complete with scuffed exterior, ugly/dirty keyboard, jerky mouse and, lately, a worrying fan noise; or for an additional $300 get a brand-new faster PC with the latest OS, more memory and bigger drive.

      Not a bad deal.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    17. Re:Cheaper? by thebagel · · Score: 1

      It's Americium inside a smoke detector. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americium

    18. Re:Cheaper? by suraklin · · Score: 1

      This happened to me when trying to install XP on a new (at the time) Asus A7N8X. I have been trying to ditch the floppy drive for what seems like ever. I incorrectly figured I could put my SATA drivers onto a CD or use the card reader in my machine, sadly the text based XP setup will not read storage drivers from anything but a floppy when you press F6.

      I have used two methods to get around this MSFT idiocy.

      1)Easiest method. Open your case,use a power splitter and hook up a floppy drive during install and remove it after.

      2)Slipstream the SATA drivers into a WinXP install CD

    19. Re:Cheaper? by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just wonder when Microsoft, along with some board manufacturers, will get their collective heads out of their collective asses and realize the 1980s are over and people don't use floppys anymore. We could officially consider the floppy disk to be dead and buried if it weren't required for certain system restores. It seems like a relatively easy fix to allow drivers to be loaded from CD or USB drives or something that holds more than a meg of data.

    20. Re:Cheaper? by djlowe · · Score: 1

      Why wire it up to an external power supply? You can get a splitter that has the power connecter that you need. It's basically a Y power splitter that has a power connector for an internal FDD on one side.

      You can probably pick them up at CompUSA, etc., along with a cheap internal FDD and interface cable.

      Turn off the computer, open the case, hook it all up and there you go. The whole cost should be around $20, I'd say, more or less.

      Regards,

      dj

    21. Re:Cheaper? by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sure everybody who replied was just trying to be helpful regarding your Windows install, but they managed to prove your point quite well. A typical non-techie hearing all that advice would be utterly lost and baffled.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    22. Re:Cheaper? by ShinGouki · · Score: 1

      this has what to do with parent poster's comment?

      --
      -dk
      Dream with the feathers of angels stuffed beneath your head.
    23. Re:Cheaper? by inode_buddha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the *vast majority* of people using PC's will actually do any of the above, if they even RTFM that far. Corporate use is a different ballgame. Yeah, right. Most users I know can't be arsed to read the comic book about how to plug in a monitor. Posters are no good either. It should just "plug into a wall and just work". Well, they wanted to buy a toaster, and so they got sold on toasters. Too bad computers are a bit more complex that toasters, and of course the manufacturers and devels have no interest in changing this. Now, we have landfills full of toasters. Yeah, I'm *pissed* in case you haven't figured it out yet. After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance? Why do they apply a different standard to computers?

      --
      C|N>K
    24. Re:Cheaper? by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      fyi, smoke alarms do NOT contain uranium in them

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    25. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they contain plutonium bombarded with neutrons, which would you rather have in your drinking water?

    26. Re:Cheaper? by Sir+Pallas · · Score: 1

      My VAIO laptop actually has something like that. It's not hardware, just a hidden partition; so if the drive goes, I'll need to order the OEM DVDs from Sony. But barring that, it's really easy (and pretty quick) to wipe the machine.

    27. Re:Cheaper? by apa666 · · Score: 1

      "...maybe it's time for manufacturers to install a HardReset button (like in a PDA) with a 1 GB ReadOnly Flash drive, which resets everything back to factory."

      Totally. I bet the manufacturers just hate it when people prematurely trash their computers and BUY NEW ONES.

    28. Re:Cheaper? by Jozer99 · · Score: 0

      Thats not what it costs to fix a machine. I run a small repair buisness for PCs. Wiping a machine and reinstalling windows only takes an hour or two, but that is not usually an option. People have documents and programs that need to be backed up, or are unreplacable. Sometimes, fixing a P3 with tons of spyware does not make as much sense at the new $299 eMachines.

    29. Re:Cheaper? by istaz · · Score: 1

      Instead of dumping them, I would suggest to advertise them away to any freecycler website. Freecycle thats the way it is.

      --
      ...don't have one yet...
    30. Re:Cheaper? by terminateprocess · · Score: 1
      I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

      Because it's a lot faster, and comes in a shiny new case with a smell of new plastic.

      --
      int cents = 0;
      cents += 2;
    31. Re:Cheaper? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And how the hell do the "unreplacable" programs get transferred from their old spyware-infested piece of crap to their new $299 piece of crap eMachine?

      The same problem still exists.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    32. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't just replace your PC with another Wintel box! It will only take 30 mins for it to get infected all over again! Why not just order a Bullet-Proof PC from http://www.bullet-proofpc.com/ which is immune to ALL spyware and viruses known and unknown! I just received mine in the mail the other day and it works great! I have piece of mind knowing that I don't have waste countless hours battling the latest Spyware or Virus.

    33. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it kinda feels like deja vu, which in turn invalidates all of this reasoning. Also you have a "HardReset" button from manufacturers. This will blow you away, but it's a cd, and it reinstalls windows along with everything else. Crazy what they can do with 21st century technology. Buck Rogers shit, but in the 21st century and not the 25th.

    34. Re:Cheaper? by plbg32 · · Score: 1

      there is a comp out there with such a reset button, can't think the name but it was just recently started advertisements in the media.

    35. Re:Cheaper? by Agent__Smith · · Score: 5, Funny

      "After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance? Why do they apply a different standard to computers?"

      Ever heard of a MAC?

      --
      "It seems that we are at the age where life stops giving us things, and starts taking them away..." Indiana Jones
    36. Re:Cheaper? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I find people disposing affected PCs highly irresponsible. Would someone think of those homeless children who dumpster-dived and brought home (or somewhere whatever) such PC? It's like throwing out old smoke alarm with perfectly good Uranium bits inside, someone's going to get hurt.

      Yes, think of the children! While doing that, we might also want to think about the installed OS that is crippling these machines and promoting the dumpster destination. Shouldn't Microsoft get taxed for a recycling charge based on a percentage of cost for every machine where its OS is preinstalled?

    37. Re:Cheaper? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, you could just install Linux on the spyware ridden old computer much to the same effect. Or boot Knoppix on it.

    38. Re:Cheaper? by lgftsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can in W2K. The BIOS provides disk services, which enable the first stage partition/format to succeed. After that, the cut down version of Windows that the installer runs in loads hardware drivers which take over the disk sub-system and if the SATA drivers are not compatible with your chipset/motherboard/drive, the system will blue-screen with a vengance.

      Dell desktops have been particularly prone to this over the past year. We had to get the SATA drivers from IBM, as the DELL recovery CDs did not work.

    39. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      duh!

      He's saying that there is no small floppy plugs coming out of the power supply.

      The only elegant solution is to have one of those y-plug converters that you can cannibalize out of other computers but you can't buy anywhere.

      In other words, Windows is not ready for the desktop because it cannot be installed on modern hardware without complicated techie slip streaming techniques, which require a working computer in the first place ;)

    40. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come on dude, you can't just replace a spyware infested windows box with a linux box and expect them to act the same. A fully updated win box will be vulnerable in a week, but they don't write spyware for linux.

    41. Re:Cheaper? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I havn't needed a floppy since '98

      yay Linux (redhat 5.2), I am pretty sure it booted off CD.

      I remember many years later ('02) trying to install W2K and being utterly pissed that I needed not one but 3 floppies to install it. Imaging floppies for install is a good way to find out your 9 year old floppy isn't at it's prime anymore. At least W2K had diskcaching during the install by deafault.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    42. Re:Cheaper? by timbo234 · · Score: 1

      Just bring an old computer alongside (which has a floppy drive power connector), and connect the floppy power connector from the old computer to the new one.

      Connect the IDE cable from the floppy into the new machine. I had to do this for a server at work - it worked, although it looked incredibly dodgy :)

      --
      Pre-canned Evolution Links for all those Slashdot holy wars.
    43. Re:Cheaper? by aichpvee · · Score: 1
      The only elegant solution is to have one of those y-plug converters that you can cannibalize out of other computers but you can't buy anywhere.

      You mean something like this?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    44. Re:Cheaper? by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

      Not that I condone this site at all (it was the first that caught my eye on a google search for 'power supply floppy adapter'), but have you considered something like this at all? Not exactly as screwy or temporary a fix as an external power source, granted it will cost you $6.50 for UPS ground, considering you can't find a site with less rediculous shipping prices.

    45. Re:Cheaper? by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

      that reads a little poorly; change considering to if, then I will be happier with the statement I made.

    46. Re:Cheaper? by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I believe IBM is the one that's advertising those along with the extra advertising that they're giving to their blade servers.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    47. Re:Cheaper? by jack_csk · · Score: 1

      It's because people expect computers to work like TV or playstation rather than a car. Imagine if you need a certificate just to play Super Mario Bros...

    48. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is about the stupidest fucking thing I have ever heard. The cheapest one is $620, and it doesn't come with a hard drive, but it comes with 512 mb of flash, and 4 gb of USB memory, prolly flash. Its also has a 1.5 Ghz Semperon, WTF are you supposed to do with that POS, even the $300 eMachines mentioned elsewhere is a way better idea than spending $600, twice as much on a way slower and limited device, they are bullet proof because of the obscure OS they run and because they are practically useless. You would be lucky to get any modern game to install let alone run with the flash drive, and even at that the flash cells would burn up in prolly a year or two. So many things wrong with that idea, its not even funny.

    49. Re:Cheaper? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I cannot figure out how to install Windows XP on my only computer capable of running it. Windows just blue-screens while trying to format the hard drive. I assume it needs drivers for my SATA chipset, since my computer is newer than XP SP2, but my PC doesn't have a floppy

      See nLite, a method of customising Windows installers, that among other things lets you add your own drivers to the CD image. (You will need to prepare this on a PC running 2k or XP though.) There's a forum if you have any problems.

    50. Re:Cheaper? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      I just wonder when Microsoft, along with some board manufacturers, will get their collective heads out of their collective asses and realize the 1980s are over and people don't use floppys anymore.

      What world are you living in? Nearly every single person I have to deal with still uses floppies to some extent. Floppies are utterly disposable. Pass them out like candy and don't care if they come back. Storage isnt that much but then again a few word docs and excel files aren't that big either.

    51. Re:Cheaper? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Jebus dude, google!

    52. Re:Cheaper? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Yeah I've heard of Commodore 64, Amiga 500, Atari 800, TI-99/4A, and TSR-80 too, what was your point again?

      And its Mac, not MAC, 2 different things.

    53. Re:Cheaper? by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      "... people don't use floppys anymore."

      Speak for yourself Dude. I still use floppies.

      Sure they don't have much capacity when compared to CDs or USB keys but lets not forget that there is still alot of hardware out there that does not support Booting from CDs or USB.

      I'll chuck my floppy drive when DVDs become obsolete, maybe.

    54. Re:Cheaper? by tyler@mango.net.nz · · Score: 1


      Why not just get a USB Floppy drive, most new motherboards support booting from USB nowadays.

    55. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't install xp, choose another career - you're not much of a techie; which speaks volumes about your ability as a coder!

    56. Re:Cheaper? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I remember many years later ('02) trying to install W2K and being utterly pissed that I needed not one but 3 floppies to install it.

      Windows 2000 came on a bootable CD.

    57. Re:Cheaper? by wstott · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Until all PCs in business offices have USB ports, the sneaker net will run on floppies. It is interesting how fast folks take to the USB jump drives. They are an easy analog for a floppy drive in peoples minds, they understand them because they understand floppies. Of course unless you are running 98 wich brings us back to floppies.

    58. Re:Cheaper? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The problem is that people are not exactly computer smart when it comes to things like this.

      In my experiences, generaly a customer doesn't realy notice the slowdown until it is too late and then has reach the end of warenty. Further more, they have taken a computer to bestbuy (were they bought it from) and were charged close to $200 for them to "remove virus and other malware" wich basicaly amounts to a format and reinstal (factory reload). The other thing they do is call tech support and get charged some hourly figure wich the tech has them perform everyhtign that doesn't work before telling them to either buy a new part or reformat.

      At this point the customer is generaly fed up with the whole process and decides to get another computer when somethign happens. They think thier problem is so bad that the thing is broke like when the VCR or DVD play quits working. I have seen this close to a dozen times were i have PCs donated to me under the condition i tell them what was wrong. They are usualy astonished to find that i spend around 2 hours with only 10-15 minuute actualy doing stuff to it before it works as normal.

      I gave one computer back so thier kids would stay off thiers and they couldn't believe how close it's speed was to the brand new one they just bought. When malware slowed it down, they asumed it was just slow and an upgrade from a P4 2.8 gig to one of the newer Pentium computers was just neccesary.

      In short, people are still being duped into being sold on bigger is better and they need all they can afford. They have at least once been taken advantage of by some unscrupulous techie or had some well intentioned but missguided "rocket scientist" friend giv ethem the wrong advice. I saw this back when the designed for XP logo was new and people insisted on upgrading to XP when the programs ran fine on 98, 2000 and ME. These sometime are completly competent people who are just iliterate when it comes to computers. I recently fixed a failed xp upgrade from ME for a lawer who thought he needed it to run office XP because someoen at the store told him it wouldn't run verry well on anything but xp because thats what it was desinged to run on.

      Now i think a recycling program might be better then a dumpster but we cannot educate these people, they don't wanna learn, they just want it to work. Sadley these types of people woudln't take the time to figure out a recycling program exist let alone place a recovery cd in the drive and follow a couple of promts on screen.

    59. Re:Cheaper? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I have noticed that when a computer blue screens durring formating a drive, it is either the worng driver, a screwed partition table (fdisk /mbr)or a bad power supplie.

      Oddly enough, the power supply seems to be the culpret the majority of the times i have experienced this. Strangly it has happened enough to actualy change one out when diagnosing other issues that would lead to a reformat and reinstall. That is if i'm tracking down different errors that don't point to something in particular. I have seen good power supplies that seem to work flawlessley and pass the leads testers i have do this. Sometimes i can place them in older computers with smaller processors without issues and sometimes the issues follow it around. This seems to happen with various power units too. it isn't just one brand. The latest i have notice is Enermax atx 12v v1.3 which seems like a solid unit.

    60. Re:Cheaper? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well thats why there are repair shops. Sure some will try and take advantage of you. They will do this even more when you talk like you know what your doing and sound like a fool. Do your homework before entrusting one.

      Anyways, a simple reinstal requiring a floppy drive hookup shouldn't cost more then $50-$60. Most repair shops will have a power conection splitter for less then $5.00 and a used floppy goes for around $10-$15 here. That is now that he knows what the problem is. If he didn't then let the repair shop do it for him. Some might even let him watch, i usualy do if they stay out of the road.

    61. Re:Cheaper? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Email would be easier, and USB jump drives need to get cheaper. Floppies are basically free.

    62. Re:Cheaper? by Jafar00 · · Score: 1

      Knowing the windows situation these days, even the 1Gb flash drive would get infected. ;)

      --
      RebateFX.com - Spread rebates for Forex traders
    63. Re:Cheaper? by DenDave · · Score: 1

      I think that even if you are going to use the recovery cd, you have a problem... Lets say you have a two year old pc with the original windows recovery cd from the manufacturer. You "nuke" the drive and reinstall. How long does it take you to get all the patches and updates downloaded? right.. Strike! Whilst updating the box after a vanilla install, you get infected.... What surprises me in this article however, is that the Knoppix cure is not mentioned. I have distributed more copies of Knoppix to colleagues (for their home computers) than I can shake a stick at! I think that about 60-70% of my colleagues have malware and of this group more than half is running Knoppix or Ubuntu to satisfy their daily internet needs.

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    64. Re:Cheaper? by hypnoticstoat · · Score: 0

      I got the same problem for a while, where my pc blue screened during a Windows install. I thought it was a duff harddrive. Swapped that still no joy. Dodgy CD, nope no luck. Bad CD drive, no. Turned out it was a buggered memory stick. Try taking them out and trying them one at a time while installing windows. I f the first one gives you a blue screen take it out and try the other. If you got a bluescreen with one stick then throw that one away, its knackered. This might not be whats causing your problem but it solved mine so it might work.

    65. Re:Cheaper? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Well, in my experience, floppies have gotten so unreliable recently (in the last 5 years, say) that I can't really say that I've seen any one use them for a while even though, as you said, their capacity is still adequate for a lot of things.

      Even in very small offices with only two or three computers, they managed to stich them together with Ethernet so they wouldn't have to deal with floppies.

      My main box (amd) hasn't had a functional floppy drive for quite a while (well it has a drive, one I bought with my 486DX-50 a while back) and I can't say I've missed having one. My iBook laptop doesn't have one, my PictureBook doesn't either (it has a USB one which I never use), the other random PCs here are all networked, the SUN boxes have floppy drives but I don't think I ever used them...

      If I need to transfer something I either put it on a public area somewhere or I take it with me on a CD or CDR or on my music player. It's really much simpler for everyone involved.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    66. Re:Cheaper? by graemecoates · · Score: 1
      It's like throwing out old smoke alarm with perfectly good Uranium bits inside, someone's going to get hurt.


      Apologies for being a pedant but this is slashdot... I think the radioactive emitter in smoke alarms tends to be americium-241.
    67. Re:Cheaper? by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What world are you living in? .... Floppies are utterly disposable. Pass them out like candy and don't care if they come back.

      What world are YOU living in? Pass out a URL with a directory- or file-specific password, save yourself the time and expense of creating the floppies, and then nobody throws anything away.

      Jasin Natael
      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    68. Re:Cheaper? by Redwin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why are you trying to boot of a disk to format prior to installing Win XP? Win XP has an option in during the setup to format the drive for you. I haven't used a floppy disk for about 4 years, yet I've installed Win XP countless times. All you need to do is set the CD drive first in the boot order and that should do it. No floppy drive is needed.

      --
      Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
    69. Re:Cheaper? by Jimmy_B · · Score: 1

      The floppy drive power connector is a smaller version of the hard drive power connectors you already have a bunch of, so you should be able to get a splitter cable with the right connector.

      IIRC, the Microsoftian way to do this would be to add make a CD-R of the install CD with the drivers included. I don't know how you would go about this, though.

    70. Re:Cheaper? by Chris+Hodges · · Score: 1

      Well I use XP, 98 and SuSE 8.2, and my flash drives are the easiest way to shift data - so long as the 98 machine has a CD drive to install the drivers. Now I just need to get USB2 working properly in Linux with a via motherboard.

    71. Re:Cheaper? by Chris+Hodges · · Score: 1

      It is dodgy, and only worth doing if you're desperate. It's best to plug the 2 machines in to adjacent sockets to reduce the earth loop passing through the signal ground lines on the floppy cable.

    72. Re:Cheaper? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I can find a HUNDRED USB keychains/storage devices in my office, but I can't find one fscking floppy disk...

    73. Re:Cheaper? by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea, um, if you don't have drivers to actually boot the disk, you need a driver disk, to install said devices and format.

      Case in point, I had to install an HP Blade BL20 G3 (brand new P4) yesterday, and couldn't get the Windows 2000 boot process to see the drives (there are USB CDROM and Floppy drives on this, since blades don't typically have any of those). And it wouldn't work. HP ships a specially configured CD for installing Windows.

      So yea, it's possible he's running into a problem. Not supporting driver CD's is a problem Microsoft needs to solve. Most linuxes I use support manufacturer disks that aren't floppies... Why can't WindowsXP?

    74. Re:Cheaper? by starmang · · Score: 0

      Ah come on.. He was shouting!

      --
      Never touch an Irish man's Guinness!@#
    75. Re:Cheaper? by Breetai · · Score: 1

      I hate floppies. My home computer doesn't have a floppy drive and I put the box together myself.

      The only reason I still have to find a floppy occurs at my work. At work I have a Tektronix TDS 744 oscilloscope which is almost 7 years old. It still uses floppies to transfer the data from the scope to my computer.

      Except for the floppy drive the scope does everything I need to do. Last I heard that Tek doesn't service or calibrate that kind of scope anymore so maybe I can convince my manager to invest in a new one. All the other scope manufacturers all base their software on Windows. I don't find that a very atractive alternative.

    76. Re:Cheaper? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Um, please please don't prevent ANYONE from upgrading from WinME. Please? Every now and again that little bastard shows up and terrorizes me...

      I had lots of great fun this weekend using all the MSDN WindowsME cds I have as skeet targets. :-)

    77. Re:Cheaper? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

      Because the recovery CD doesn't come with the computer, and also, the techs at best buy don't actually remove the spyware completely.

      The only way to 100% ensure the spyware is removed is to froma 'clean' environment format the hard drive, flash the bios on the infected motherboard, and then perform said recovery steps. and then install 5 programs, to protect from spyware if IE use is allowed/enabled.

      (if you 'break' IE and install firefox, then only firefox and a good firewall like black ice/zone alarm is needed)

      it's much easier to just buy one of those mac's that use your existing keyboard/mouse/monitor to swap out.

    78. Re:Cheaper? by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Burn a CD with XP and the drivers on it?

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    79. Re:Cheaper? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Use a USB floppy - XP SP2 actually is able to use these at install (I keep one around for the same reason - I have no floppy drives in my machines any more).

    80. Re:Cheaper? by Bombur · · Score: 1

      The friendly article mentioned that "people are increasingly unwilling to take out their 'software tweezers' to clean their machines", maybe it's time for manufacturers to install a HardReset button (like in a PDA) with a 1 GB ReadOnly Flash drive, which resets everything back to factory. That would be the first wire to cut in a new machine.

    81. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you would have read the article the pc will not recognize the usb floppy as drive A: which is the ONLY drive windows will pull external drivers from during the dos text only part of the windows install.

    82. Re:Cheaper? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I've been tempted to reinstall the 5 1/4 floppy just so people will ask what it is, and I can make a superior geeky reply.

      seriously tho isn't diposable PC every geeks dream, and endless supply of cpu cycles to cluster and network.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    83. Re:Cheaper? by bobcote · · Score: 1

      Maybe the root cause of this may be found in the saying "He has more money than sense".
      Maybe he just wanted a new machine and needed an excuse?

      You can start a reformat and rebuild the old system in the time it takes to order, wait for and set up a new system.

      What about all the data he left on the old system. Or did he reformat the drive before tossing the machine?

      The subject of the article has PhD in computer science!

      I hope he replaced it with a Mac.

    84. Re:Cheaper? by Eclypser · · Score: 1

      maybe it's time for manufacturers to install a HardReset button (like in a PDA) with a 1 GB ReadOnly Flash drive, which resets everything back to factory.
      My HP computer came with the corporate acceptable version of this. They have a portion of the hard drive devoted to resetting the hard drive to the factory option. So no matter what happens, I can just hit the F2 button at startup and reset everything back to original.
      Instead of appreciating this, users sued HP for not providing installation CDs.

      --
      The comment has already been made. Let's move it along people. Nothing to see here.
    85. Re:Cheaper? by Markus_UW · · Score: 1

      Also, he could re-burn the XP cd with his driver on it (that's what I did, since my VIA Raid controller wasn't detected by windoze at all, i got a "No Hard Drives Detected" message). The fun part is that I can install linux without a hitch (i know, i know, its because its newer).

    86. Re:Cheaper? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm *pissed* in case you haven't figured it out yet. After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance? Why do they apply a different standard to computers?

      The difference between a car and a computer is that improper use of a car can lead to death of the driver, passengers, or other people on the road. Improper computer use has only led to high bloodpressure and a string of 4 letter words based on what I've witnessed.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    87. Re:Cheaper? by mccabem · · Score: 1

      From the past:
      What world are you living in? Nearly every single person I have to deal with still uses floppies to some extent.

      Welcome to the future, friend!

      Someday your people will use optical storage technology too! I'm sorry I can't share ours with you...it would be too much risk to our own timeline.

      But never fear! Your people will progress!

      Someday, you'll even have hard drives that you'll measure in terms of gigabytes!!

      I know you're thinking this all sounds crazy, but it's true!

      See you in the future Stormy!

      Sincerely,
      Matt McCabe
      Year 2005

      P.S. It's been nearly a decade since I last had anything to do with a floppy, so take heart: It Can Be Done.

      P.P.S. An investment tip: Apple never does go out of business and they're the first to officially ditch the aging floppy technology that they originally brought into the mainstream.

    88. Re:Cheaper? by amaiman · · Score: 1

      Why would the manufacturers want to do that (the hard reset button)? It adds cost to the machine, and they're more than happy to sell you a new machine if you want to throw yours out when it has spyware.

      Not saying that it's not a bad idea to have such a reset feature, though.

    89. Re:Cheaper? by darthmundt · · Score: 1
      Windows NT 4(at least the later prints of it) also came on a bootable CD...

      I booted from CD and installed it on many old 133Mhz w/ 16mb ram systems with only a CD rom installed.

      --
      - no sig here
    90. Re:Cheaper? by Darby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hey, while we're having free tech support day ;-)

      I have a Dell optiplex GX260. When I plug in a PCI video card, Linux immediately kernel panics. It's done it with 3 different video cards using SuSE, RedHat and Gentoo.

      Any ideas?

    91. Re:Cheaper? by Markus_UW · · Score: 1

      Since when can you get a computer for $400?? I spent $2500 building my new one.

    92. Re:Cheaper? by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Email would be easier, and USB jump drives need to get cheaper. Floppies are basically free.

      The hidden cost behind a floppy is the time it takes to copy a megabyte to and from the floppy...

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    93. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance? Why do they apply a different standard to computers?
      Because you're not going to run someone over with your brand new Dell.
    94. Re:Cheaper? by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1
      USB jump drives are cheap enough. I just bought a 1GB SanDisk Titanium Cruzer for $85. High-speed, lots of space (though I should have looked for a 2GB).

      This thing has been a Godsend. Loading/creating ghost images, driver installs, spyware removal... In terms of useability the expense over floppies is far outwieghed.

    95. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefered the 27 diskettes myself. Why yes, I am paid by the hour. Why do you ask?

    96. Re:Cheaper? by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

      Up until last year I still had a 5 1/4 loppy in my main system here. no-one said a word... Just a lot of strange looks and people backing slowly away. (But, in all honesty, that may have been due to the bloody penguin on my desk.)

    97. Re:Cheaper? by nmx · · Score: 1

      It's because people expect computers to work like TV or playstation rather than a car. Imagine if you need a certificate just to play Super Mario Bros...

      Super Mario Bros. comes on read-only memory and thus there's nothing the user can do to damage it (aside from physically damaging the cartridge). Computers and cars don't work that way.

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try."
    98. Re:Cheaper? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      So you'd give a few docs to a coworker on an $85 jump drive knowing full well you might not get it back?

      Floppies won't be dead until there's another disposable storage media.

    99. Re:Cheaper? by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      CD-Rs and CD-RWs are pretty much disposable too. And as a bonus, they can actually hold more than 2 or 3 Word docs and can even hold a document with pictures in it. Unless you're only transferring plain text, there isn't much that fits into 1.44 MB of storage anymore.

    100. Re:Cheaper? by ebh · · Score: 1
      After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance?


      Lemme guess: You're not American.

    101. Re:Cheaper? by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1
      After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance?

      Yes. I bought a Honda with no intention of ever so much as changing the oil myself. I pay somebody else to do it, because it's a dirty, annoying, time-consuming process that I have no natural aptitude for. I suck at all things mechanical, I can't drive a nail properly half of the time. So I buy cars that I'm confident will require little to no maintenance to be done by myself.

      Having a license to operate the vehicle is utterly unrelated to being qualified to service it, and this is where your analogy falls apart. Millions of people drive cars who couldn't diagnose and solve the most simplistic problem. I, at least, recognize the symptoms of a failing alternator, slipped belt, bad starter, loose air hose, low coolant, etc. But it's naive, asinine, and a little smug of you to look down your nose at the masses of people who don't give a flying shit about your stupid computer hobby and the high standards to which you wish to hold anybody else to dares to dabbled their finger in it. This attitude is alarmingly widespread among our ilk. I've seen people on Slashdot even suggest that unless you're willing to learn how to program, you have no business using a computer, because you don't know how it works.

      Well, then I expect you move out of your apartment into a cardboard box in Antarctica, because the average Slashdot poster can't maintain basic operating systems of a common house, has never so much as changed a furnace filter in their lives, can't make a simple mitre cut with a backsaw and a box, doesn't know what kind of bit to use for masonry drilling, can't shingle a roof, service their own lawnmower, or ground a circuit.

      Insightful my ass. I used to be really nice in most posts because I valued the extra exposure I get for having nice karma, but I just don't care any more. You're a prick, and you deserve to be called one.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    102. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they'd LOVE this! Just put the hard-reset where little old ladies will push it, and WHAMMO, piles of new business!

    103. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try installing on SATA only systems without an option for "emulating" PATA in BIOS...

    104. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless your local Freecycle moderators are psychopaths who post to their own groups using aliases to cause trouble... and then completely deny any involvement. (Hello? Email headers? Perfectly matched static IPs... yeah, sure, that's someone ELSE posting!!)

    105. Re:Cheaper? by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

      Because they don't want you to see the porn they downloaded.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
    106. Re:Cheaper? by sparkane · · Score: 1

      Rather, it's either pay $100 to get the same two-year old machine back, complete with scuffed exterior, ugly/dirty keyboard, jerky mouse and, lately, a worrying fan noise; or for an additional $300 get a brand-new faster PC with the latest OS, more memory and bigger drive.

      Ah, but then they aren't doing it to "get rid of the virus", are they? They're taking advantage of an opportune moment to upgrade. In this regard, then, getting infected with a load of spyware is no different from one's hard drive giving out, or some other essential component. Various posters here have been talking in the same way, like this is what the article is talking about. If it is, the whole issue is a non-story.

      I've stated my opinion about throwing away the pc in lieu of cleaning a virus off in the original post of this story (yes, this is a dupe) - IMO it's idiotic. There's only one new computer purchase that makes sense to me for this purpose - buying a mac. And some people do that. But I don't think the article is that explicit.

      I'll change my opinion. Buying a new Windows machine to get rid of viruses (not to upgrade at a point when the old box has "given up", more or less) may not be idiotic, but (IMO) it is deeply ignorant. Seems to me a better machine will just run more spyware and viruses, and faster. This story just further emphasizes the fact that users generally don't seem to want to learn how to keep their computers clean. I mean, frankly, it might be more secure to downgrade one's machine, by which I mean to run Win98 instead of the newer versions. At least there are no universally-accessible services running on that OS.

      A great litmus test of any Windows user is to tell them that many problems will go away if they use an account with restricted permissions, and see how they react to the concurrent inconveniences (with e.g. software installation). If they prefer the convenience, then what you have is simply a user who refuses to be learned, or larned as I like to say. People who are looking for a way actually to keep their computer clean will not only deal with the inconvenience, but thank you for the advice.

    107. Re:Cheaper? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      XP won't crash just because you don't have SATA drivers :) As for the power supply, just get an adaptor to run a floppy drive. I have a SATA hard disk and was in the same situation (I didn't even get a driver disk with my controller, which sucked). Windows just won't find your disk if you don't have the driver. If your computer crashes, it might be something more serious.

    108. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I plug in a PCI video card, Linux immediately kernel panics.

      Try turning the computer off first.

    109. Re:Cheaper? by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance?

      Actually, yes...they take some test at 16 and seemingly forget the rules for the next 40 or more years (i can't attest to countries other than my own).

      The good news I see out of this behaviour is the hand-me-downs will enable the poor to gain access as the auto has in its own way.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
    110. Re:Cheaper? by ZeroEpoch · · Score: 0

      I spliced in an FDC power connection just the other day for a system in order to install Linux (basically a thin client, with HD only, no CDROM). I just cut the necessary part off an old power supply then soldered the cable right in. The system was an old PII 333 with a 130W Powersupply.

    111. Re:Cheaper? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't the hardware cost- it's the labor cost. The simple fact is that in America, time is more valuable than hardware.

      The cost to fix/clean a home PC can easily exceed the value of the old PC, and often the cost of a new PC. (*If* you can find a recovery CD)

      This factor isn't new- it's happened to a lot of areas. Labor cost is why tech support is outsource to India. Same thing happened to textiles, manufacturing, autos, etc.

    112. Re:Cheaper? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am. Born and raised. And I'm *shocked* at the level of stupidity that ppl seem to expect to get away with.

      --
      C|N>K
    113. Re:Cheaper? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      What analogy? Hell, I'm sick of making analogies myself but here is the point I was trying to make:

      at least you are *trying* to maintain your Honda, and are aware that it needs maintenance; and,

      at least you are *trying* to be a licensed and qualified driver on public roads.

      Now what was the problem?

      --
      C|N>K
    114. Re:Cheaper? by object88 · · Score: 1

      Floppies won't be dead until there's another disposable storage media.

      My mileage varied.

      Where I work, everyone has public folders on a server, with plenty of free space. Failing that, there's email. I haven't used a floppy disc in years (no exageration).

    115. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've installed xp pro original with no service packs on a recently built system that has a sata drive, no problems there. One issue however that I experienced similar to yours was that the sound card and or network card can cause the bsod on install, try removing them and adding them after windows is completly installed, I know it doesn't make a lot of sense but when does windows ever, and it worked for me. BTW, this is CSIDano not anonymous coward, but my login has not been working lately,

    116. Re:Cheaper? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Amen.

      (Pats iBook.)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    117. Re:Cheaper? by Golias · · Score: 1

      Anyways, a simple reinstal requiring a floppy drive hookup shouldn't cost more then $50-$60.

      Swell... but not many people would buy an old P-III 400 MHz computer for $60, so why would anybody want to spend $60 getting an old one to work?

      Were I unable to get a system like that working myself, I would simply donate it to a school, where kids can learn how to format and install computers by doing all the labor themselves, write it off on my taxes, and put my $60 towards buying a better system.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    118. Re:Cheaper? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I havn't seen too many P3 400MHz computers that didn't come with a floppy or at least the conections for one inside. Nore if one did exist, it definatly doesn't have a sata drive that is cause the neccesity the grandparent poster has for a floppy.

      On the other hand, you do make a valid point. There would be a time were the computers just isn't worth the trouble to someone but might help others in different ways. As with everything, the judgment involved in the decisions would have a personal bias. I guess the issue at hand would be is the bias subject to misinformation from a sales staff, evil techie, or is it form sound knowledge?

    119. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely. Programming low level device drivers on linux is easy compared to Windows administration. I hadn't used Windows on a personal system for several years, until I recently purchased an IBM notebook. I decided to keep XP on, and resize and partition the drive for Linux. I was hoping to play around with the new Microsoft development tools. After having the usual breezy experience with Linux, I booted back into my windows partition to configure it a bit.

      I figured at this point I could cruise around, and download various system tools.

      Big mistake.

      Unfortunately, I didn't have the good incite to download Firefox before exploring a bit, nor to get all of the windows updates.

      Apparently there exist bugs in VBScript that allow the execution of ActiveX code without permissions. About ten minutes later Norton was complaining that somehow a plethora of spyware and viruses had been delivered to my computer in a komodo dragon spit like paste.

      This was the illiad, the odyssey extended maybe four or five hours. Scanning for viruses, removing them, downloading spybot, getting rid of things. Reboot, check to see if any strange processes are running. Manually removing programs , because Norton Antivirus is too stupid to prevent the system from being infected in the first place; let alone figure out how to terminate a process and delete its executable.

      In the end, I just couldn't compete with the creative, yet morally vacant, armies of hired Windows programmers. Viruses are easy to remove, spyware, however, is the manifestation of an incredibly creative mind completely vacant of moral consideration. I think the Linux programming culture blinds people into thinking that intellect generally comes hand in hand with morality.

      I get a knot in my stomach every time I think of administrating a Windows system. People in my family insist on using it, and insist on me fixing it because I'm supposedly the resident computer guru. If I were ignorant enough to not realize the difference between the operating system, and the computer itself, I can definitely say that I would have been tempted to toss the entire machine. Instead, I just tossed the source of the problem--- windows.

    120. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As a coder and techie" ???

      where in the worlds did you get the idea that you qualify as either???

      and folks wonder why sw is crap, it's being written by morons that can't even install things properly...

    121. Re:Cheaper? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      And for the day to day average middle aged office folk (there are A LOT) who don't use things like that as second nature?

    122. Re:Cheaper? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      I fought an up-hill battle for all that type of proper IT structure for 4 years in higher ed, it's tough changing those people's minds.

    123. Re:Cheaper? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      It's been nearly a decade since I last had anything to do with a floppy, so take heart: It Can Be Done.

      Interesting note, not everything computerized is as advanced or needs to be as the desktop pc. The building controllers for my former employer's security and cardreader system all booted from and ran off of floppies and 486 system boards.

    124. Re:Cheaper? by wstott · · Score: 1
      Email would be easier, and USB jump drives need to get cheaper. Floppies are basically free

      Floppies: on the road to a client and you need 5 floppies. Floppies are not free, in a pinch they can cost a buck a piece.

      email: Yes, it is easy, ubiquitous and fast. It also requires knowledge. Many if not most users have no idea where an attachment goes when saved much less where is it cached on receipt.

      Further, they are so scared of viruses that the presence of an attachment leads to a compulsive need to download spyware infested fake clean-up tools.

      Remember, most users think AOL is the internet.

    125. Re:Cheaper? by emidln · · Score: 1

      I write code for microcontrollers for a living. I can think of a lot of things that may be wrong here, but as I don't have the source I can't fix them. That's why this machine was previously a BSD and Linux machine. I only wanted to use windows for Battlefield: 2.

      How about this, AC. If you can't code for 8bit RISC in machine code then you suck as a techie. 50 numbers in hex, that's all. Control current at the lowest level and move some stuff. How about writing a CAN driver? I'm a techie, and I can do it, can you? That's how ridiculous your argument is.

    126. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you're not going to run someone over with your brand new Dell.

      No, but when your new Dell becomes infected with all sorts of wee beasties (viruses, trojans, worms, etc.), you are a danger and a pain in the ass for the rest of the civilized people on the web.

  2. Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Drop timothy in the dumpster... along with Zonk, Taco, etc.

    1. Re:Dupe Removal by tuxguy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Haha, drop CmdrTaco in the dumpster... These type of posts make me laugh, if only for the fact that Taco built Slashdot.

      --
      "I don't really care if they label me a Jesus Freak / There aint no disguising the truth!" - DC Talk
    2. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he doesn't care about it anymore. He doesn't read it, he hasn't posted in a discussion in over a year, and he's refused to address any of its many problems. He only fired michael because michael got caught abusing a friend of his.

    3. Re:Dupe Removal by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      On the first Dupe of Monday, Timothy gave to me
      People trashing spywared PCs

      On the second Dupe of Monday, Timothy gave to me
      Old computer booklets
      And people trashing spywared PCs ...

      --
      Point of interest. Offering to shoot us might not work so well as an incentive as you might imagine.
    4. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you suggesting a coup d'état? Where do I sign up?? Let the revolution begin!

    5. Re:Dupe Removal by someonewhois · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm waiting for the day that there's a slashdot article that only links to another slashdot article.

    6. Re:Dupe Removal by qewl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm completely convinced all the dupes and extended mysterious future posts(Not to mention increase paid subscriptions) are merely to increase page views and therefore site reloads to increase revenue. There's just no way the editors could post so many dupes within hours by mistake.

      --

      (\_/)
      (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
    7. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two days, four hours, 9 minutes between dupes. Generally its something like a week or month (or years), isn't it? What's the smallest time between dupes you've ever seen?

    8. Re:Dupe Removal by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Very unfortunately, though, it seems that even if 1000 people complain about the dupes, they won't stop doing it. Maybe they really don't care?

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    9. Re:Dupe Removal by Decameron81 · · Score: 1

      That or Timothy is a stutterer.

      --
      diegoT
    10. Re:Dupe Removal by The+Standard+Deviant · · Score: 1

      I think it's probably some kind of GNAA style initiation where the condition of joining is that you have to deliberately submit a dupe to Slashdot and have it published.

    11. Re:Dupe Removal by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      you'd think even my oddball submissions would be more interesting than a repeat. I think we are actaually dealing with the /. editor's summer replacements here.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    12. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. I'm beginning to wonder: Do the /. editors READ /.?

      I'm beginning to think the answer is a big ol' negatory.

    13. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh. You get +2 mod for Insightful and I get -2 mod for Redundant.
      see here.
      My original comment:
      I really feel sorry for the /. subscribers whose paid-for ad-free page views are going towards dupes. It almost seems like the /. eds are trying to make them buy more views just to be able to see new articles...

    14. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm completely convinced all the dupes...are merely to increase page views and therefore site reloads to increase revenue

      If that's the case, they should dupe the 9/11, Iraq, and Kerry concedes stories. They generated thousands of comments.

    15. Re:Dupe Removal by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you forgotten the age-old maxim? Do not ascribe to greed that which can be readily explained by sheer idiocy.

    16. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Where do I sign up?? Let the revolution begin!
      cherchez le white rabbit
    17. Re:Dupe Removal by Fareq · · Score: 1

      It happened a few weeks ago. You missed it already.

      Sorry.

      Let's see... can I find the link... nope, I can't... oh well

    18. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1

      One time, a story was duped while the original was still on the main page only a few stories down. But wait, it get's better - Taco "truped" the story the very next day.

    19. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      12 first post's a milking
      11dupe stories dancing
      10 google articles singing
      9 M$bashing threads
      8 Karma whores
      7 hello.jpg's
      8. KDE vs. Gnome flamewars
      5 roland pipsquelle slashvertisments
      4 netcraft confirms BSD is dead posts
      3 build your self something you could buy for 1/3 the cost stories
      2. trolls a prancing
      a cmdr taco eating a burrito in a lemon tree

    20. Re:Dupe Removal by festers · · Score: 1

      LOL! This is the funniest thing I've read all day. Bravo!

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    21. Re:Dupe Removal by clem · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, I have a feeling we'll be seeing it again.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    22. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please elaborate, I haven't been aware of any drama behind the scenes...

    23. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    24. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen a dupe on the same front page as the original a few weeks back... I think it was cancelled because noone wrote anything in the discussion except for "dupedupedupe!" and whatnot.
      I think they were four posts apart or so...

    25. Re:Dupe Removal by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      That's true. CmdrTaco has admitted this in the past - the editors are perfectly aware that some stories are dupes, but choose to "re-run" them nonetheless.

      I've written about it a while ago here.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    26. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it is true that ultimately, the responsibility for dupes lies with the editors (and I use that term very loosely), that doesn't mean the submitters shouldn't bare some of the blame as well.

      How hard is it to do a search before submitting a story to see if it's already been covered? It's easy enough that you have to assume that some submitters are purposely trying to trick the editors into posting dupes.

      I propose that the user responsible for submitting an already posted story should be unable to make another submission ever again (open to appeal, of course). That should give them the proper motivation to do a proper search and put an end to what's probably the #1 gripe around here.

    27. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This explains what happend to Michael Sims.

    28. Re:Dupe Removal by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      This story is a *lot* more interesting than yet another dupe:

      UN at odds over internet's future

    29. Re:Dupe Removal by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Looks like it's time to write a greasmonkey dupe detector.

      How about if, in any article, there are more than 3 posts with the word "dupe" in them, mark it as "DUPE" in big red font at the top?
      It won't save the people that first get there, but it would sure help me (of the last-post)

      Perhaps a little massaging of the Slashdot NoBS filter would do it.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    30. Re:Dupe Removal by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      interesting...I guess I better go read the posts and follow TFA's on grease monkey. I REALLY need to, shall we say, "customize" my /. experience if the eds [and some of the modding it nutty too] are going to go all sloppy on me.
      technically, I would also investigate other filtering applied to just the post title...I actually recognized the subject from the title and expect a storm of complaints before I clicked "Read More"....not sure what kind of filter though. Your idea should work because it puts the work on the readers who, once they know the deal, will gladdly say "DUPE!". Aha here's the rub: its abusable....any body making three comments containing "dupe" can supress a post. Nah, maybe we would need a database of past posts [we could just use /. "sid" numbers and rely on /. archives as the actuall DB. Well this is getting complicated. Too bad. You have at least 1/2 an idea here that /. readers could really use.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    31. Re:Dupe Removal by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

      There's just no way the editors could post so many dupes within hours by mistake.

      Yes there is: using Slashdot's search feature to see if there's a previous article on a given subject.

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    32. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      way to not understand english!

    33. Re:Dupe Removal by mesach · · Score: 1

      You know, I believe that I shall make that my Slashdot mission. For my only approved post to be a dupe of another slashdot post referencing the first.

      --
      moo.
    34. Re:Dupe Removal by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Well, I just whipped up one that looks for the number of "dupe!!" posts ... it works for this article, anyway :-)

      All it does on this version is just put a big ol' red "DUPLICATE ARTICLE" just before the start of the comments... which is probably enough for me.

      I've put it up here

      It's a quick hack of the NO BS slashdot script which is handy in itself. :-)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    35. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a stutterer, and quite frankly that joke is insulting to my lot. Famous stutterers throughout history include brilliant men like Churchill, Newton, and Demosthenes.

      The /. moderators, on the other hand, are just idiots.

      Posting anon, not because I'm ashamed of being a stutterer, but because I don't need the editors hating my ass.

    36. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but you can also beat some sense into people by hurting them in the pocket. If we keep the number of comments to a minimum within dupes, there will be less page reloads, therefore less ad revenue, and the editors will try harder to avoid them.

    37. Re:Dupe Removal by slazar · · Score: 1

      slazar writes: "The New York Times is reporting that some Slashdot users prefer throwing out their articles and reading dupes to actually reading only one article. Does this mean lots of dupes for the clueless editor among us?

    38. Re:Dupe Removal by sahrss · · Score: 1

      way to not understand sarcasm!

    39. Re:Dupe Removal by LS · · Score: 1

      And why should someone believe in this maxim???

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    40. Re:Dupe Removal by AsimovBesterClarke · · Score: 1

      > Have you forgotten the age-old maxim? Do not ascribe to greed that which can be readily explained by sheer idiocy.

      And as with the original, neither are mutually exclusive. Hmmm, I think I have Mark's Razor.

      --
      Ads are broken.
    41. Re:Dupe Removal by Decameron81 · · Score: 1

      Heh, sorry about that. My point, however, was not an attempt to diminish stutterers. Simply to point out how often the exact same news item is duplicated here on slashdot. It kind of beats the odds doesn't it?

      Once again, sorry.

      --
      diegoT
  3. Solution: install more spyware by nokilli · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Or actually, malware is I guess what we should be calling it.

    There's malware out there that will reformat your hard drive, right?

    So maybe the best recommendation we can give these people is not to throw out their computers, but to try and have as much malware installed on their systems as possible, because eventually the situation repairs itself.

    And as a bonus, every time the hard drive gets wiped means they reach for the Windows Install CD. What better opportunity for Linux evangelization than at the point of operating system installation? What do they have to lose by trying Linux at this point?

    If we can see to it that enough of these Live/Install CD's are distributed en-masse, a la AOL, then the chances are good that at least some of these people will at least try installing Linux.

    OpenOffice, Evolution, the GiMP, and Firefox? For free? Without malware or the threat of same? A lot of people are going to say "Yes!" to that.

    --
    Why didn't you know?

    1. Re:Solution: install more spyware by stillmatic · · Score: 1

      Dream on. If a user is throwing away a whole PC to deal with spyware, you are living in a fantasy land if you think they will make it through any Linux install (let alone using it after completion).

    2. Re:Solution: install more spyware by nokilli · · Score: 1

      Have you used a LiveCD recently?

      Without any user intervention whatsoever, up comes a full usable desktop environment complete with browser, which is the only application many users even need.

      Installation to the HD can be as simple as putting an image of the CD onto the HD. Helps make things load faster, and you get to do things like save bookmarks, etc.

      And if ever the installation gets foobared, the user has the piece of mind of knowing that all she/he has to do is boot from the CD again, and start the process all over again.

    3. Re:Solution: install more spyware by saskboy · · Score: 1

      As soon as someone makes a program that automatically backs up someone's picture collection, and Instant messenger/email settings, that can be dumped into a Linux system that runs their camera and other devices, I'm sure there will be millions of people switching.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    4. Re:Solution: install more spyware by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      Linux? A non-propellerhead or non-rocket scientist using Linux? Now that's funny. 90% of people who have computers have no business being within a mile of one, and you expect them to figure out something even more complicated then Windows, which they don't understand now? HA HA!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    5. Re:Solution: install more spyware by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      yeah. Many people, if they got a computer with ubuntu on it, would get it very quickly. For the average old lady, linux (if it came preconfigured for e-mail and websurfing using whatever) would be a perfectly viable solution, if it had the right software, most of which is included in ubuntu.

  4. Fool me once.... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It just boggles the mind that people would throw out a Windows machine and then replace it with another! Windows machine which is immediately susceptible and commonly infected within twenty minutes or so of being re-connected to the Internet. This happens often even before you have time to install updates. The old fool me once, fool me twice adage comes to mind.

    The smarter move would be to migrate to a system that is less affected by worms/virus/security issues. For the vast majority, I would think that system would be OS X. But hey, that's just me. If your time is that valuable that you would simply replace your system rather than wiping it and reinstalling the OS, you think that you would either be smart enough to think different. Of course clicking on the referenced article makes you sit through an ad for Dell unless you dismiss the ad, so what does that mean? :-) Interestingly in the linked article, Dr. Wong does replace her HP system with a Powerbook. This has been our experience as well. We have replaced most of our Windows based systems with Macs running OS X leaving our Windows systems headless and sitting behind a Macintosh and a firewall with respect to the Internet. For grad student systems, giving them a Mac is the best possible solution. They can download all the software they want, surf the web and write their email all on the same system they use for their data analysis without worry and I'm not getting calls or visits to my office saying "Ummmmmmm. I think my system is infected" Time devoted to troubleshooting has gone to essentially nothing. Additionally, the last meeting I had down in our computer science department revealed that a good portion of the faculty were also switching from Windows/Linux/SGI to OS X. That was encouraging for a whole lot of reasons.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Fool me once.... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      How does it go again?
      Fool me once, shame
      on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again.

      See, can't get fooled again, you. What was the question?

    2. Re:Fool me once.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but you can't get fooled again.

    3. Re:Fool me once.... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      Amy Wong: "Fool me seven times, shame on you. Fool me eight or more times, shame on me."

      Stuart

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    4. Re:Fool me once.... by fa2k · · Score: 1

      Well, people think that their old PC is slow and assume thay need a new, faster one. The new N+1GHz MultiCore system will run the spyware more efficiently, thus reassuring the user that buying a new computer was the right thing to do. Then it gradually becomes filled with malware and loses its speed. Repeat from top. Is malware and bloat fuelling the hardware industry?

    5. Re:Fool me once.... by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      It just boggles the mind that people would throw out a Windows machine and then replace it with another!

      Allow me to unboggle. The article is crap.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    6. Re:Fool me once.... by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It just boggles the mind that people would throw out a Windows machine and then replace it with another! Windows machine which is immediately susceptible and commonly infected within twenty minutes or so of being re-connected to the Internet.

      The smarter move would be to migrate to a system that is less affected by worms/virus/security issues.

      The majority of people have only been exposed to Windows. They think computers simply wear out. They don't see it as getting infected over and over again by dozens of worms, they see it as "oh well, computer's worn out, better replace it".

      In that context, it's perfectly reasonable to go and get something similar to what they already had. They don't think anything happening is wrong. They think this is normal.

      Until something happens to teach the average person that this isn't right and can be avoided by switching to something like Mac OS X, this will carry on happening. I have no idea what that something is. Maybe a virus that forces the person to read an explanation of the issues before it gives access of the computer back or something? I dunno.

    7. Re:Fool me once.... by bani · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you want a system which isnt affected by worms/virus/security issues at all, you could always use a TRS-80.

      definitely safer than OSX.

      there's no OS updates to have to fuss about with, either.

      They can download all the software they want, surf the web and write their email all on the same system they use for their data analysis without worry and I'm not getting calls or visits to my office saying "Ummmmmmm. I think my system is infected"

      You could accomplish the same thing with apple //. The hardware is a lot cheaper too.

    8. Re:Fool me once.... by Dont_Shoot · · Score: 1

      First of all read my name and obey it...

      I'm with you on the fact that throwing out a computer because you have some spyware is utter crap.

      However, the whole dump windows and switch to OS X is absurd to most, me included.

      Two reasons:

      First, being I can't run most of the software I use on anything but windows.

      Second, if we all took your advice it would take maby a month or two for the spyware creators to catch on and start consentrating on OS X machines. Thus, we would all switch back to windows, or another operating system and the spyware writers would switch with us, and the cycle continues.

      People keep forgetting that the reason that Windows is affected by so much spyware is because it is on over 90% of the personal computers on the market.

      --
      Never Underestimate the Power of Stupid People in Large Groups.
    9. Re:Fool me once.... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      It just boggles the mind that people would throw out a Windows machine and then replace it with another! Windows machine which is immediately susceptible and commonly infected within twenty minutes or so of being re-connected to the Internet.

      Does that mean they're buying a new PC every twenty minutes?!

      That must explain all the computer specials on ShopNBC.

    10. Re:Fool me once.... by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      90% market share is not why Windows gets all the spyware and viruses. It's the weak security model and buggy coding.

      Even if everyone in the world started using OSX, there would never be as many viruses and spyware affecting the system as there are on Windows. First, no one runs as root on OSX, which is what you're effectiv ely doing on Windows, unless you specifically know better. Second - no Active X to install the nasties in the first place.

      It may be the case that Windows is slowly but surely patching up the chinks in the armor, but OS X is much more secure to begin with.

    11. Re:Fool me once.... by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      While I agree that those are vaid points, I can't see where 'insightful' comes from. Maybe 'funny' would be a better score.

      You can do the same things with a piece of paper and a hand calculator, but that doesn't make them worthwhile uses of time.

      So... which browser should I use on the Apple II? Does it support Java and QuickTime? What about Word? Can it run Word? Or Pages?

      Maybe I'm just taking a humorous post too seriously...

    12. Re:Fool me once.... by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

      If you want a system which isnt affected by worms/virus/security issues at all, you could always use a TRS-80.

      Considering how old the thing is, there probably is actual viruses and worms living in the keyboard... More of a medical issue.

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    13. Re:Fool me once.... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You still have social engineering to deal with. The same people who click "Yes" to everything in IE/Windows will just type in their Admin password whenever some box pops up and asks for it in OS X. MacOS is more secure against worms and drive by installs, but the real problem is with the user.

    14. Re:Fool me once.... by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

      Learn to love such people. They'll readily buy 486's with linux and comment to you later, "Wow, this thing is blazing fast! Thanks man! It's so much faster than my 2 year old rust bucket Dell. 486? Is that some geek company? Do they sell mp3 players?"

      --
      I8-D
    15. Re:Fool me once.... by Dont_Shoot · · Score: 1
      This is all true. However, the viruses and spyware are writen to take advantage of the security holes you mentioned because they are targeting windows. They are targeting windows because they can then affect the majority of the users.

      If the majority was using OS X they would find holes in OS X. Every operating system has security holes. The only way to have no security holes on your system is to disconect from the internet(and all networks for that matter), remove any peripherals, and remove all drives (except the hard drive). No OS is perfect and the spyware/virus companies are going to take advantage of every imperfection in whatever OS is the most common.

      --
      Never Underestimate the Power of Stupid People in Large Groups.
    16. Re:Fool me once.... by BigFootApe · · Score: 1
      They can download all the software they want, surf the web and write their email all on the same system they use for their data analysis without worry and I'm not getting calls or visits to my office saying "Ummmmmmm. I think my system is infected"

      You could accomplish the same thing with apple //. The hardware is a lot cheaper too.



      I realize this can be done with a C64. Can you point me towards the software for an Apple II to do this? As far as I know, Contiki isn't ready yet (on Apple).
    17. Re:Fool me once.... by roberri · · Score: 1
      My company once ran a scheme where staff could purchase a PC at a heavily subsidised rate and spread the cost of the payments over three years. The scheme was some kind of tax write-off and the thinking was that by offering all the employees a new PC, they could raise basic computer literacy within the organisation.

      The machine itself wasn't anything special, but at $10 a month I wasn't complaining. It was a low end PC with a printer and monitor. Once the RAM was upgraded, it was just enough to XP. Since I already a decent machine of my own, I gave it to my parents who where chuffed to bits with their new toy.

      ... Then they proceeded to break it every way imaginable.

      That box went through a lot. Viruses, rogue dialers, a most comprehensive collection of malware. Not to imagine having every single craptastic free app from magazine cover discs and the Webtron installed on it. Every single time I went to visit them, I had to spend a couple of hours backing up all their personal stuff and then rebuilding the damn thing.

      I tried everything. I installed firewalls, applied patches, stopped them running as Admin and then even tried educating them. My parents are pretty smart people, but they didn't really grok the whole maintenance gig.

      In the end, I got so pissed up with whole thing, that I went on the offensive. I'd been impressed by my little iBook and the sweetness and light that is OS X and my folks liked it too. So I bought them a Mac Mini, with a view to ending all my support woes.

      ... And they loved it.

      That little box just worked. They had all their photo's in iPhoto. They could read email and browse tinternet with impunity. Everything went swimmingly for the first couple months.

      Then the fucking thing was hit by lightening and was killed instantly.

      *Sigh* Sometimes you just can't win.

    18. Re:Fool me once.... by Cecil · · Score: 1

      DISCLAIMER: I am not really a Mac zealot (though I am happy with mine *shrug*), but this kind of logic bugs me.

      First, being I can't run most of the software I use on anything but windows.

      Well, this is certainly true. But unless you're talking about some highly, highly specialized software (which may be true for you specifically but isn't for *most* of those "most"), it's unlikely that there aren't equivalents on Mac. So these people need to consider that perhaps it's time for them to learn something new. Don't take the "you" I use from here on out personally, I'm not directing this explicitly at you, but rather at all the people who say this kind of thing.

      I mean, it is like claiming that learning to drive with a manual transmission is absurd to most, because you only know how to drive an automatic. Yes, it's *true*. But it's only true because most don't *want* to. Which is your right, but at least admit it, and understand that yes it does make you look like a bit of a whiner when you complain about spyware. "Well, this sucks, but I don't want to change it."

      You may in all actuality be able to get everything you want to do done on a Mac. You may even find that it turns out to be a pleasant experience notwithstanding the lack of viruses and spyware. Maybe not, but there's always that risk. If someone says "Hey this Photoshop program is pretty good" and you're only familiar with MS Paint, you'll probably give it a shot right? So why not try the same with Mac?

      To quote George Carlin (from memory, forgive me if it's not perfect):

      "My needs aren't being met." Well, then, DROP SOME OF YOUR NEEDS!

    19. Re:Fool me once.... by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      > people would throw out a Windows machine and then replace it with another! Windows machine

      I suspect that to 99% of PC buyers "computer" = "Intel PC" = "Windows"; the same as "Internet Explorer" = "the Internet".

      So they do not buy a "Windows machine" per se, they buy a "computer". All the PCs in the shop have Windows on them, all (or most) of their friends have Windows so it must be the best !

      Baaahhhh

    20. Re:Fool me once.... by dascandy · · Score: 1

      > They can download all the software they want, surf the web and write their email all on the same system they use for their data analysis without worry and I'm not getting calls or visits to my office saying "Ummmmmmm. I think my system is infected"

      I assume then you're referring to them being able to download all sorts of windows software after which they'll be unable to run it. If you can run any bit of software, you one day will just stumble over some bit of spyware or virus. The only difference between a virus/spyware and a normal program is that the normal program does what the user tells it to and a virus/spyware program does what its creator tells it to do. A computer can't tell who is giving out the orders.

      Mac's aren't immune, they're just very incompatible.

    21. Re:Fool me once.... by Dont_Shoot · · Score: 1
      Wow, a logical Mac user.

      This is the first logical rebutal I've had to this line of thinking. Unfortunately I do use very highly specialized software, most of which I wrote myself, so this won't work for me. But it is true for others who can find replacements.

      That being said, I still hold to my second line of reasoning. If we all started using Macs the spyware companies would just target OS X and there would be more spyware on OS X.

      Also, I would like to point out that I now have a Mac, along with all my Windows PCs and Linux PC. I think that all OS's have their pros and cons. Windows I like for daily use and compatibility with the majority of the world, Linux makes a great fast, secure server, and Mac is great for Graphics. So when I say I prefere Windows in most cases it is an educated dicision. And, I do think more Windows users need to try out other systems.

      --
      Never Underestimate the Power of Stupid People in Large Groups.
    22. Re:Fool me once.... by RevWhite · · Score: 0

      It's painful how true this post is. I work in an internal helldesk for a fairly well-known multinational company and about 50% of users mean IE when they say "the internet is broken." Excuse me, they actually say something like "the intarweb thingy don't work no more. Am I fired?"

      --
      Hey, can I bum a sig?
  5. *sigh* I tired.... by tekiegreg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Saw this dupe article in the mysterious future....emailed the on duty editor as fast as I could, and it went anyways well *dons flamesuit* let's get ready to rumble....

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:*sigh* I tired.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The editor never ever responds to those emails.

      It's probably a spam filled account anways, but then why put the address on the webpage?

    2. Re:*sigh* I tired.... by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      I always wondered that myself....maybe an email form feedback with a captcha test attached to that hyperlink might prove more effective...

      --
      ...in bed
  6. Are you kidding me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How is it that the editors know less about what's on their site than someone like me who very rarely glances at the headlines?

  7. The Dupes by kensai · · Score: 3, Informative

    And the dupes they just keep a coming.

  8. Repost by Jmechy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Was this not posted just a few days ago?

    1. Re:Repost by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      IIRC, this was posted just yesterday (not gonna check, though).

    2. Re:Repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, Robert Malda is an incompetent buffoon and should resign in shame immediately.

    3. Re:Repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can 100s of ./ readers spot dupes in 2 seconds, yet an entire staff can't spot them on their own site?

      Add in a 1 hour delay or something. Even casual readers spot this stuff.

  9. Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    I don't see this as viable. Spyware may be somewhat expensive to clean, but so is patching windows and migrating your existing data. I guess if you never use it for anything other than surfing the web.... But then why not just install Linux?

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by Mr2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you really think the kind of person who (1) lets his PC fill up with spyware, then (2) chooses to spend $500 on a new PC instead of spending a couple hours cleaning it out, is going to want to learn Linux?

      "OMG WTF happened to My Computer? Where's Internet Explorer? Why do I have to have a password?"

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    2. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by einhverfr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have several customers who have migrated to Linux for similar reasons. They are all beginner consumers.

      The problem largely is that tech support people treat consumers as idiots incapabile of learning the system. I usually start by explaining spyware, how it gets on your computer, how to avoid it/prevent it, etc. Then if it continues, I start suggesting Linux. I show them via a demo system how easy it is to use, and they are usually sold on the idea pretty quickly.

      Computers aren't that hard to understand if we dispense with the tech talk and actually focus on communicating with the consumers.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    3. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      The problem largely is that tech support people treat consumers as idiots incapabile of learning the system

      Yeah I've seen quite a few of those, most of them Linux gurus that IRONICALLY! are frequent posters in Linux irc channels.

    4. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Yeah I've seen quite a few of those, most of them Linux gurus that IRONICALLY! are frequent posters in Linux irc channels.

      I would hardly call them "gurus." Most people take such an approach because they are trying to cover for their own feelings like they don't understand it.

      But this is par for the course in our industry. WTF does the OSI model have to do with TCP/IP? OSI was, from its inception, supposed to be completely separate. Since TCP/IP doesn't really follow that model, why teach it? Answer is simple-- it makes those who teach it feel superior to those who learn it. And it makes computer networks seem unnecessarily complicated.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    5. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is largely that consumers are idiots unwilling to learn the system. They view cosmetic differences from Windows as "problems". The differences between one FTP client and another throw them into a tizzy. (I know, I know, showing an idiot FTP, bad move). Computers aren't that hard to understand if people are willing and able to learn but that's rarely the case. Congratulations on having beginner users who understand that it takes effort, knowlege and skill to use a computer and are willing to acquire some!

    6. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Well, I will admit that there are some customers who are willfully ignorant because they are afraid to learn. But usually these are only afraid in this way because they are otherwise afraid to learn about other gadgets. One relative of mine comes to mind who refused to know enough about her laundry drier to try replacing the fuse when it stopped working. She didn't even know what a fuse was supposed to do.

      On the other hand, the vast majority of my customers want to learn. They just are intimidated by computers and they need someone who can explain things in consumer-friendly ways. (Yes, one can go into deep technical detail, but just make sure it is accessible).

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    7. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      s/consumers/customers/g
      I think that's what you meant, but it irks me to see that.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    8. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Then if it continues, I start suggesting Linux. I show them via a demo system how easy it is to use, and they are usually sold on the idea pretty quickly.

      I hope you offer to sell them those demo systems too.

      A friend of mine installed Ubuntu on his new laptop and enlisted my help. Now, I've been using Linux for over 10 years, I've been programming since I was 5 years old, and I've got a wireless network at home... but even with the help of a HOWTO, I couldn't get WPA to work. We eventually had to downgrade his network to WEP just so he could get online.

      Linux is plenty easy to use, once you have it set up. Getting it set up and working with all your existing hardware, I fear, is still beyond many users, especially the ones who would switch just because they can't stop themselves from installing Comet Cursor or punching the monkey.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    9. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      Yeah. For example, my mom (who is somewhere between intermediate and beginner) now wants to learn about linux. At first it was "But... windows is so much easier to use" but now that she's seen some of the nicer features on my computer (excluding the ones granted me by the hardware gods) she is actually fairly interested in it. Only reason they haven't switched is because they need the map/trip programs.

    10. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      learn Linux?
      What is so difficult about moving a mouse and clicking on an icon? They should already be familiar with a "browser", and might even have tried Firefox already. Same goes for thunderbird. Sure - when the spyware tries to come calling - they are protected. They'll also find it extremely difficult to get a virus. They will also be adware free. The Microsoft slowdown will disappear, and they'll be happy with the newly responsive interface. The bags of new features when using the file browser will send "oohs" and "aahs", much like a very pretty fireworks show. Then they will wonder why anyone ever used Windows.

      a couple hours cleaning it out
      Ever tried "cleaning out" a Microsoft Windows PC? You need to format and re-install - there is no cleaning out. Heck, most of the time it gets into such a state it won't even boot.

      Why do I have to have a password?
      Let me guess - you're a Windows 3.1 user?

    11. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1
      but even with the help of a HOWTO, I couldn't get WPA to work.


      Why on earth would you ever think that Windows Product Activation would work on Ubuntu? ;P
      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    12. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      What is so difficult about moving a mouse and clicking on an icon?

      You're mistaken if you think using and maintaining a Linux system requires nothing more than clicking on icons. Sooner or later you're going to need to know the location and format of certain config files, how to use several command line utilities, etc., even for tasks where Windows provides a GUI. Distributions like Ubuntu have gotten closer to your goal, but from what I've seen, they're not there yet.

      Ever tried "cleaning out" a Microsoft Windows PC? You need to format and re-install - there is no cleaning out. Heck, most of the time it gets into such a state it won't even boot.

      Yeah, actually, I have. Ad-aware, Spybot, and AVG take care of most everything. For the rest, there's regedit (though of course I wouldn't expect the average user to remove spyware that way).

      I have never seen, nor heard of, spyware preventing a system from booting; in such a case, a repair installation might work, and if not, you'd need to reinstall. Much like any other OS.

      Let me guess - you're a Windows 3.1 user?

      Windows XP doesn't require you to set up an administrator password, and many (if not most) XP users don't have one.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    13. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are consumers. We produce, they consume. Nothing is "custom" about the experience, they are buying one of a million prepackaged Dell or HP computers. They are not interested in the technical details; they want to give you their money and in exchange get one of those Internet boxes just like everyone else has. They are like baby birds, mouth open, waiting for the worm, no consideration of what they actually *need* or anything below the surface of simply owning the same objects everyone else does.

    14. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you really think the kind of person who (1) lets his PC fill up with spyware, then (2) chooses to spend $500 on a new PC instead of spending a couple hours cleaning it out, is going to want to learn Linux?
      Do you think the person whose horse just died, is going to want to learn to drive a car?

      Of course not, because he doesn't know that cars exist.

      That doesn't mean it ain't a damn good idea, though.

    15. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you think the person whose horse just died, is going to want to learn to drive a car?"

      If his horse died because he forgot it needed to eat every day, I wouldn't trust him behind the wheel of a car.

    16. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by bLindmOnkey · · Score: 1

      out of curiosity, what kind of custumers have you had that are open to making the jump to linux? Old people tired of wasting money on repair to care? I think it's incredible that you can even convince someone to switch to something they've probably only heard about from the linux junkie next door; Afterall, once they realize that they won't be able to install any off-the-shelf software on their system, and that installing anything in linux is no mindless task, i'd imagine they'll just end up buying another windows machine. `

      I'm a big linux fan even though I'm guilty of being a big windows junkie (mostly for convenience of gaming and multimedia software like photoshop and premiere etc) but kudos to you for acually converting some users and "showing them the way" so to speak. In all my life I've never met a tech who's acually thought about telling their clients to use anything other than windows (largely because spyware cleanup/system reformatting brings them regular business). Nevetheless, I'm glad to see there are people out there doing the public good and making the cyberworld a safer place.

    17. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by phasm42 · · Score: 1
      I don't think the word customer has anything to do with a "custom" experience.
      They are like baby birds, mouth open, waiting for the worm,
      This made me laugh though, good imagery.
      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    18. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by Rndm* · · Score: 1

      Linux is great, I switched to it several years ago. But the only reason I've been able to stick with it is the fact that I have a resident Linux guru in the house. I have a lot of extras, tablet, scanner and so on and he's saved me from a lot of hair pulling. I'd love to have everyone switch to Linux and after using Ubuntu I feel like I've finally found the ONE distro that the regular user might be able to use. The problem is though, that without more support for linux (ie linux techs to repair systems or install special software) people will run into a dead ends. Most of the information is out there, but the average consumer won't know where to start looking for it. Virtually everyone knows someone who's a windows guru, so help is never far away. Not so with linux, yet.

      --
      PHEASANTS!
    19. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Virtually everyone knows someone who's a windows guru, so help is never far away. Not so with linux, yet.

      This is exactly why I offer Linux support to home users.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  10. repeat by tfcdesign · · Score: 1

    you guys posted this topic a day or so ago.

  11. If once wasn't enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More fine redundancy control by /. Let's do everyone a favor and mod this article down.

  12. Yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm typing this from a dumpster right now. Thank you, spyware.

    1. Re:Yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC?

      Sure you're not Oscar the Grouch?

  13. landfills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What it means is even more toxic substances and heavy metals in our landfills.

  14. Quote Leo Laporte by Cyberglich · · Score: 1

    Buy a mac :)

    1. Re:Quote Leo Laporte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs are expensive, but compatibility is priceless.

    2. Re:Quote Leo Laporte by dotgain · · Score: 1
      Yes. Need to be compatible with all that malware.

      I really wish sometimes that I could open all those ILOVEYOU.PIF and LOL.SCR jokes my friends send to me. Whenever I go over to their place to see it they've got it in at the shop getting it "cleaned out" or something. Strange. Must be clumsy with their drinks.

  15. Dupes Overwhelming! by MrMista_B · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, I'm new here, but holy crap, these dupes are almost worse than spam!

    Seriously. Do the admins just not even read /. anymore?

    Heh, guess they're just smarter than the rest of us then. :-)

  16. *alert!* by ChronoZ · · Score: 1
  17. Original /. Article by Webb21 · · Score: 0
    --
    "A good compromise leaves everyone mad." -Calvin
  18. repeat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what i did was do a search for the word "spyware" in the slashdot search box.. its an incredibly complicated process i admit, but perhaps it should form some part of a log overdue quality procedure for accepting submissions..

    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/16/180 221&tid=126&tid=172&tid=98

  19. More than a replacement by balamw · · Score: 2, Funny

    By the looks of it, "the doctor who replaced her infected computer", and "says she no longer clicks on pop-ups" did more than replace her comupter. She switched to a Mac (and spent a bit more than $500 for that 51" Powerbook ;-)). B

    1. Re:More than a replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a 51" powerbook!

    2. Re:More than a replacement by balamw · · Score: 1

      Me too. Wishful thinking or dyslexia? B

  20. I don't know about.... by srhoades · · Score: 1

    dropping PC's but the ball sure gets dropped a lot around here with all the dupe articles. I think I would prefer the NY times, the stories may be made up but at least you don't have to read the same ones monday and then again on friday.

    1. Re:I don't know about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the ones posted within hours of each other. I've seen some where the old article hadn't even scrolled off the front page yet! Proof that the editors don't even bother looking at the home page.

  21. This is the way Society is going by fixer007 · · Score: 1

    With the price of electronics these days, most people can afford to just throw things away. I fix peoples computers on the side, and I am hearing this more and more everyday. People just don't want to bother with the 'hassle' of fixing things. Plus they get the 'bonus' of having the latest and greatest toys.

  22. Premium subscription service by PeteyG · · Score: 1

    Is one of the benefits of being a Slashdot subscriber NOT having to see duplicate stories on the front page?

    Sooooo many solutions to this problem.
    -Text analysis built into Slashcode to detect potential duplicate stories
    -Having another editor spot check a story for dupeness (there are plenty of editors for this to work)
    -Have editors read the headline of every story every day.
    -Lynch editors who consistently post dupes

    --
    no thanks
    1. Re:Premium subscription service by Monte · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is one of the benefits of being a Slashdot subscriber NOT having to see duplicate stories on the front page?

      As a subscriber I can answer this with an authoritive "no fscking way".

      You do get to see articles before they "go live" to the hoi-polloi, and you can even e-mail the editor if you think there's a problem with the article (say, if you know it's a dupe from about 48 hours ago).

      You can see for yourself just how well this all works out.

    2. Re:Premium subscription service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently not. So don't subscribe. If everyone is fed up enough they'll either a) come to their senses and implement such a system or b) die, and be replaced by something superior (which, frankly, wouldn't be hard.)

      Hey, they implented some anti-bot features for AC posting. Maybe /. will modernize...

    3. Re:Premium subscription service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lolzor, so you basically pay for the privilege of doing editing work? Shouldn't THEY pay YOU to find problems in the stories?

    4. Re:Premium subscription service by Monte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shouldn't THEY pay YOU to find problems in the stories?

      Just the other day I made this very observation when I emailed an editor pointing out a grammatical error (usage of "your" instead of "you're") in a Mysterious Future post.

      Alas, no reply offering employment along these lines. Still, hope springs eternal.

  23. Must be duplicates day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/16/180 221

    Dupe in only 1 day, 19 hours, 54 minutes...

  24. Another thought...switch to MAC by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 1

    Before I get slammed...hear me out. I am a Debian user. I love Open Source and Linux. However, my wife didn't catch the Linux bug. However, after bitching up a storm about her Windows XP laptop she agreed to let me get her a MAC iBook. Two months later she's still Spyware and Virus free. My point....Linux isn't for everyone, but there are alternatives (as we all know). I was thrilled to get my wife hooked on her MAC. Now she won't put it down! Did I mention that we still have no Spyware or Viruses? Oh...OK, I did.

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
    1. Re:Another thought...switch to MAC by phalse+phace · · Score: 1
      But what does your wife's Media Access Control have to do with any of this?

      Oh wait, you mean this Mac.

    2. Re:Another thought...switch to MAC by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      There is MAC . And there is Mac . Not the same thing.

    3. Re:Another thought...switch to MAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also got hooked on MAC. I was originally running WINDOWS, and then I switched to LINUX. But I didn't get the whole LINUX thing, so thats when I decided to buy and APPLE MAC COMPUTER. It is great, a COMPUTER that has a good cLi and can run ADOBE PHOTOshop and MICROSOfT OfFiCe. I LOVE it. Did I mention I have Tourette SYNDROM?

    4. Re:Another thought...switch to MAC by ne0n · · Score: 1

      anybody throwing away a PC (ostensibly because of spyware) was probably looking for a new computer for other reasons too. Any hardware that old would have to run a pretty old version of Linux (or at least the desktop environments) to be even slightly usable. Macs still cost too much for most people. For $100 less than the price of a Mac Mini, you can get a 3GHz P4 from Dell with a 15" LCD screen.
      Did you know that using Firefox instead of IE can keep most Windows installations spyware-free?

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    5. Re:Another thought...switch to MAC by flosofl · · Score: 1

      There is MAC . And there is Mac . Not the same thing.

      You forgot one.

      There's also MAC

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    6. Re:Another thought...switch to MAC by KillShill · · Score: 1

      and what programs does she now run on her new system?

      i guess you did tell her that she'd have to buy all the new programs from scratch (minus Free sw). not to mention that many programs (but some equivalents) are not available on the new one.

      it's feasible for some people to switch systems but many people don't need or want to.

      i've been virus and spyware/malware/crapware free since i've been using a computer (and i used to run unpatched too).

      so clearly, it's the user that's at fault. the OS/machine certainly takes some blame but people need more education regardless of the short term successes or failures.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    7. Re:Another thought...switch to MAC by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      And there is MAC.

    8. Re:Another thought...switch to MAC by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Ha! Good one!

      You know, I was going to fire up Google and get into a "MAC" war with you, but it's late. So, I must regretfully surrender. You can have France.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    9. Re:Another thought...switch to MAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and what programs does she now run on her new system?

      Any GOOD software that comes out for the PC also comes out for the Mac.

      i guess you did tell her that she'd have to buy all the new programs from scratch (minus Free sw). not to mention that many programs (but some equivalents) are not available on the new one.

      How much software does one really use? Email, browser, word processor (maybe), media players. Most software that the average home user uses is free or can be purchased quite cheaply for the Mac (notice I left out iLife because it comes free with all new Macs).

      it's feasible for some people to switch systems but many people don't need or want to.

      It is feasible for most people to switch and most really should. Windows is a breeding ground for worms, trojans, spyware, and DDOS drones. Mac and Linux are not.

      i've been virus and spyware/malware/crapware free since i've been using a computer (and i used to run unpatched too).

      Two questions: are you sure about that? Do you practice unsafe sex too? Sorry this is Slashdot, no one here is getting sex...

      so clearly, it's the user that's at fault. the OS/machine certainly takes some blame but people need more education regardless of the short term successes or failures.

      I would have to disagree. Most users, the ones that will never read this posting, just want their computers to work. They don't care about antivirus, spyware removers, or even backing up their computers. I believe that it is the responsibilty of the software developer, of which I am one, to do everything in their power to provide a quality product. Windows falls far short of this mark.

  25. OMG a deja vu! by Lithgon · · Score: 1

    There must have been a change in the matrix!

  26. /. has become a sham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm completely convinced all the dupes and extended mysterious future posts are merely to increase page views and therefore site reloads to increase revenue. There's just no way the editors could post so many dupes within hours by mistake.

  27. They *have* to be doing this on purpose by DogDude · · Score: 0

    OK, somebody help me figure this out. There's no way that anybody could be this stupid. These dupes are on purpose. My only question is why? Do they think that they will get more clickthroughs when we get sick of looking at the same articles? Do they like all of these posts saying "dupe"? Why are they (the people who run Slashdot) doing this? Any ideas?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:They *have* to be doing this on purpose by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Apply Occam's Razor.

      They're incompetent.

    2. Re:They *have* to be doing this on purpose by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      Sometimes they admit that the story was "previously posted on Slashdot". I don't know if this only happens after everyone cries "Dupe!", but it's possible that they're deliberately reposting the article (or posting a different news carrier's story of it) for people who miss the first. Or maybe they just want to piss off the people who complain about dupes, but that's kinda doubtful.

      Seeing as that number of dupe-callers is increasing, and the posts are getting modded up to +5 Funny or +5 Informative instead of -1 Redundant or Offtopic like they used to be, I'd say enough Slashdotters with mod points are getting miffed that they might want to get a handle on all the repeats. If they've been deliberately reposting stories with benevolent intentions, they need to come forward and say so.

    3. Re:They *have* to be doing this on purpose by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      My main problem with the dupes is that there is so many comments about it being a dupe that the discussion is almost useless, and when I'm scrolling through the front page and see a dupe I quick scrolling down, thinking that I've already caught the rest of the headlines (assuming I don't recognize right off it is a dupe).

    4. Re:They *have* to be doing this on purpose by Chmarr · · Score: 1

      Almost 400 comments so far. So, yes, it was worth it.

      Now... if a dupe got NO comments, THEN we'd some real action :)

  28. Awesome! by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    I love how Slashdot editors keep pushing the boundries to bring us new cloning technology.

    For instance, not only was this posted two days ago (in the same section!), but this newer version has a shorter into, yet it appears to use the exact same article!

    The implications of this new cloning technology cou- what? This isn't a cloned article? It's a duplicate?

    What the #)%&#. What the hell are editors for, then?

  29. This is a conspiracy! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    This /. dupe smells of Wallmart/Dell conspiracy. And the dumpster is on it too!

  30. Just don't do like a friend did... by TWX · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, some friends of mine are going dumpster diving. This is back in the middle of the tech bubble, so fairly cash-rich companies are continually throwing out good equipment as they buy more. Anyway, the experienced one is driving around looking for suitable places, with the newbie riding shotgun. They pull up behind a high end computer service business in a strip mall to check out the goods. The experienced one had told many stories (and provided proof) of incredible finds in places like this, and spurred on by these stories the newbie hops out of the car, runs over, and vaults himself over the lip of the dumpster, feet first inside. What greeted him wasn't the spoils of computer repair, but the spoiled discards of the Chinese restaurant two doors down from the computer business...

    In Phoenix, in the Summer...

    And there weren't any computer parts discarded that day by that shop anyway...

    Boy would that suck...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Just don't do like a friend did... by hilaryduff · · Score: 0

      in europe theyre not allowed to just throw them out anymore.. they're required to pay to have them recycled properly. so mostly they PAY someone to take them away.

    2. Re:Just don't do like a friend did... by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      IBM had PL/1 with syntax worse than JOSS,
      and everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...


      So DEC, while hoping to outdo, wrote DCL and BLISS, plus SOS and EDT - the programmers were pissed!

  31. It's like changing the oil in your lawnmower... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    ...slightly scary for the uninitiated or those without the right tools. And for some, $199 for a new lawnmower every three years actually feels cheaper than three visits to the small engine repair place, where it always seems to be $89 no matter what they do.

    My point is, that's how a lot of people feel about their computers. Except, they don't store their kids' wedding pictures in their lawnmowers, so people are going to have to get used to actually doing something about their problems (or learning about backups, and not getting infected in the first place).

    Is this why the "Geek Squad" ads are suddenly appearing to resonate enough to be run non-stop on network broadcasts? If the "Got Junk" people can run an entire business based on hauling that old rusty lawnmower (you know, the one you didn't want to lube yourself) out of your back yard, it seems that the "Got Spyware" people should be able to find the sweet spot, price-wise, in making house calls, solving the problem, and keeping users running. Maybe for the price of a pizza or two.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  32. Should we throw our old PCs in the dumpster 2x by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    first version was from Wall Street Journal [reported], which I read in the print edition I get delivered, now it's a rebroadcast on the New York Times, will you post the BBC News version too?

    Seriously though - NEVER TOSS YOUR OLD PC IN THE DUMPSTER!!!!!

    It has mercury in it, as well as other hazardous materials, and should be taken to a recycle center or returned to its manufacturer.

    In the old days, a friend of mine near Sydney (in Oz) used to strip the gold from the memory boards from big computers and resell it to supplement his university salary. He used some to build giant arrays too.

    But the cheapest thing is to switch browsers and turn off permissions.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  33. Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is reporting that its editors prefer posting duplicate stories to actually checking if the same thing has been posted before. Does this mean lots of duplicated discussion for those who get tired of it?

  34. Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults."

    Maybe the better question is: Why do service centers charge so much? Seems like there's plenty of blame to go around.

    1. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by jsweval · · Score: 1

      $$$ You have to pay me a lot of money to go through all the bullshit to get rid of spyware without reformatting the computer!

    2. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by cavtroop · · Score: 1

      $100 is actually pretty good for spyware removal. Figure $50/hr, which is a very conservative rate, and a nasty spyware infection, that Spybot or Adaware don't remove, or can't. So, you go registry diving, ripping things out, rebooting into safe mode, etc. Next thing you know, 3 hours has passed. That 1/3 to 1/2 the cost of a new machine. If you don't think that spyware removal is worth $50.hr, then just do it yourself. But most people don't have the skills, and have to pay.

    3. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by B'Trey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah but if you're willing to throw the computer in the dumpster, then reformatting is an option. The question isn't buying a new computer versus cleaning the spyware, the question is buying a new computer versus formatting-and-reinstalling. I don't see anyway the former should be cheaper.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    4. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Not only that, new PC costs are coming down fast. You'll easily be able to get a new Dell for $200 within a year, max.

    5. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what is more important is the data on the drive, recovering that is golden, plus "users lose stuff"(tm) so they do not want to reinstall. And activation hassles.

    6. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think about it for a minute. A typical college kid who's working as a techie in a computer store is going to expect about $20/hr for their time. This means the cost to actually employ that kid (after taxes and regulatory requirements) is closer to $35/hr.

      You will never get even close to 1/2 utilization out of your staff of repair kids, you need to collect at least double that from the customers ($70), and then another $20 for the cost of keeping your doors open (and for the store manager to spend at least part of his/her time making sure the techies aren't stealing all the 2 GB Ram sticks or slacking off or whatever.)

      That leaves $80 a day of sweet, sweet profit, all for the joy of dealing with angry assholes who will often take out their frustrations on you. Gosh, I wonder why there aren't more places fighting to get a piece of that action?

      From the users perspective, they could pay $100/hr to lose all their data and end up with the same crappy computer they always had, or for a mere $300 more they could have a shiny new computer with 5 times the CPU power, 4 times the memory, 4 times the hard drive space, a DVD burner, a massively better video card, and a pretty new keyboard. It's not surprising that a lot of people decide that they'd rather spend a little extra than pouring more money into a system which has been giving them fits.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because you are asking them to deal with your problem? You are supposed to be a grown-up boy and know how to prevent shit from happening after all. And if that is not the case, then guess whose problem that is?

    8. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If no data on the machine is worth saving, then $100 is do-able. This, however, is rarely the case. Most people out there end up having some amount of data that needs rescuing prior to a restore procedure. This adds time, and therefore cost to the equation.

    9. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twenty bucks an hour?!

      Man... I'm in the wrong line of work. That's like forty grand a year, just to format computers.

    10. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by teknokracy · · Score: 1

      i make $9/hr canadian where i work fixing computers, and we charge $70 an hour for service. it's not the best, but that is basically what my time is worth, the work is easy.

    11. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Golias · · Score: 1

      i make $9/hr canadian

      Really? What's that in real money?

      I keed, I keed!

      I joke-a with you! I love the Canada! I keed because I love!

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    12. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      This is clear evidence that there is an untapped market for the first company to release easy to use ghosting software, publicise it well and drop their price to the impulse range. Marketing and pricing it as a professionals tool when ordinary people are throwing their computers in the garbage over the problem your tool solves is crying stupid. Norton should be all over this sort of thing with a $20 for-dummies ghost product.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    13. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I wish I was making $20 an hour. How's $9 and having to use my own car most of the time.

    14. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      Why do service centers charge so much?
      Most idiots who can't bother to wipe the drive and reinstall windows from scratch also can't bother to bring in the CD/DVD that came with the machine. Some places actually keep copies of every install CD for every computer they've ever sold. Your mom & pop places don't have that luxury.

      I wish all PCs would have the CoA stickered to the inside of the case and the factory image CD/DVD sitting in a compartment secured with a few screws. That way MS can't claim you don't have the right to use the OS that came with the machine because you lost a CD or piece of paper.

    15. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by jim_deane · · Score: 1
      Think about it for a minute. A typical college kid who's working as a techie in a computer store is going to expect about $20/hr for their time.


      Oh my God, did I fall asleep in 2005 and wake up in 2030?

      Why did I bother going to college if I could make $42,000 a year as a non-degreed computer techie? And I've been doing that crap for free for my department and relative for years!

      Of course, around here, the non-degreed computer techies can expect to make $6.50-$8/hr, maximum, with no benefits...

      Jim
    16. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $20/hour?

      Do you own a shop? Where is it? I'm dropping a resume off.

    17. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by wstott · · Score: 1
      Speaking as a computer shop owner of 10 years, we do not charge enough. My rates are $70/hr and we have four to six machines going at once and clear 2 a day on bad days. The typical bill is $70 not the $280 the time used really warrants.

      Really good professional shops are few and far between anymore because it is hard to make money this way.

      The professional shop, however, can usually save your data for you instead of just wiping the drive. And geeks love to through off wiping and reinstalling a system as trivial. Well, most people in the daily light world have no idea where the driver or proram disks are and of course no backups.

      So, $70 vs. $400. And keep in mind that $400 gets you an eMachine or toy Compaq. Trashing a $1000 pc for want of cleaning it up is in excusable.

      And the first thing the people get after buying the $400 pc (and loosing the disks) is Simms 2 or Guild Wars. Now they need a $150 video card.

    18. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by andrewmc · · Score: 1
      Maybe the better question is: Why do service centers charge so much? Seems like there's plenty of blame to go around.
      Maybe this is the perfect time for the "easy" Linux distributions, like Ubuntu etc., to make inroads. "Whoa there, mate - before you chuck that PC, it'll cost you nothing to try this out. If you don't like it, you're still free to pay $400 and make the same mistake twice". I know I'd be happier to donate my time doing this for several people than to waste even one hour cleaning up a spyware-infested Windows box.
    19. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by wodeh · · Score: 1

      Well, driven by my capitalist girlfriend we make the most of peoples computer problems and get between £10 and £20 an hour, often with bonuses and the odd bit of free hardware, for popping to peoples houses and helping the out with problems privately. I definately do not have a degree, I would notice something like that. That makes me a not degreed computer techie getting over $20 for my time- of course it's not a full time occupation, and a lot of people do better.

      I have seen many a computer bogged down by spyware and bloatware crap like Norton Antivirus, they perform so dismally that it's no surprise people give up and buy a new one- but if you can make a wad of cash doing difficult and technical things like "uninstalling Norton Antivirus" then why complain? Go out there and sell yourself!

      Oh, and someone grab me a computer from the dumpster- I could use some old DIMMs for my ageing linux box, and perhaps a Duron better than 1.1ghz.

      --
      Gadgetoid.com - Gadgets & Games Journalism
    20. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's more an excuse to update their PC. (Like getting a new BMW when the ash trays are full.) Possibly one reason people don't just wipe and reinstall is that many PCs now come with some weird OEM installer that uses files stored on the harddisk; if that's screwed you have to buy a new OS at retail, and for not much more you can get a new PC with an OEM Windows and repeat. One might suspect planned obsolescence. I might have expected a mention of the Mac mini here; but it seems like many abusive relationships, no matter how many times they beat you up you convince yourself that they've turned a new leaf and go back for more punishment rather than breaking away.

    21. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ..if you would be just buying a new computer because of spyware you'd be doing it monthly - thus, you'd be buying pretty much the same machine every month..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    22. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by jrockway · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I get $7.39/hour and we "charge"* $35/hour minimum.

      * Of course it's not real money, it's a sheet of paper that says "so and so department has allocated $35 to computer repair expenses".

      --
      My other car is first.
    23. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by toomanyhandles · · Score: 1

      I was pretty disappointed with the payoff from my degrees, until I left academia. there's a whole other world out there... one that pays you what you are worth. B

    24. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by dazk · · Score: 1

      and two weeks later they are again spyware infested because they rather buy new hardware than figuring out what's the reason for it in the first place.

      Weird reasoning, really.

    25. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im 26 years old, day out of highschool went to work, never went to college. I hold very basic certs, and am employeed full time as a Security/VOIP administrator making well into the high 60's a year USD.

      Degree's are overrated, and the only people that defend them are the ones that dished out the cash and got them. As mentioned in another post, there is a thing called getting paid for what your worth, and 10 years of exp and a loaded resume show what I am worth. And only a couple lines of schooling.

    26. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      If you read the article, the guy who threw his comp away has a PhDCS (Comp Sci), so theoretically he ought to be able to manage a format reinstall by himself.

      Mind you, with that much ejumucation his grasp on practical reality must be a bit shaky already. Notice that even though he is a DOCTOR of COMP SCI he's still got a box so infected with spyware he feels the need to throw it away. I'm just a code monkey with a little piddly B.S, but I've never had a major virus or spyware infection on any box I've run.

      'Course I've got code monkey friends who routinely tell me things like, "That firewall script you gave me was keeping (insert insecure application name here) from working right, so I just plugged my network cable into the cable modem for a minute and now my box is acting funny."

      All the stuff you need to do that is available for free, or over the counter, and takes an insignificant amount of time to install, compared to the time it'll save you in the long run. It just boils down to users taking the time to do it.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    27. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by tombeard · · Score: 1

      I assume you are being sarcastic? Have you tried to uninstall NAV from a new machine lately? Took about 2 hours on the phone with Norton tech support. It is deffinately non trivial and it breaks XP.

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    28. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by atari_808 · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you got your wages for a typical college kid working in a computer store, but it a little high. I have a friend that works at geek squad any he is only making $12/hr and has been working there for almost a year. I can see making $20/hr eventually, but not out of college.

    29. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Golias · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a lot of work. I just run Macs. Naked and unprotected on a DSL connection since the earliest days of broadband... never pwned, never infected.

      Mind you, in that time I also briefly had a Linux server which was corrupted by warez kids and a Windows PC (for gaming) which I accidentally left turned on overnight that was briefly utilized by phishers... but I took both of those machines off line and have never had a problem since.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    30. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Meh. Small price to pay for not having to run a mac XD

      Seriously, I don't consider it to be much work. I have a fancy linux firewall set up to do my NAT and packet routing, and I have a windows box running Norton antivirus. Since the Linux stuff is something I do for a living, I don't consider that wasted work, and who can't install Norton?

      All it takes is a reasonable amount of care.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    31. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by mr_flea · · Score: 1

      They're going to KNOW how to use the DVD burner? And they're going to actually use all of the cpu power, hard drive space, and memory? And they haven't seen the $30 keyboards in WalMart or whatever?

    32. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by jim_deane · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see. Well, when doing things on the side, I generally charge $22.50/hr. That's for writing/editing, computer hardware or software work, whatever. When I started charging that, it was reasonable, now it is cheap. Someday I'll increase my base rate.

      My original post (see two parents above this one) was regarding the ability of a "...college kid working as a techie..." making $20/hr. Assuming the kid worked part time 20 hr/wk, that would amount to an income of about $21,000/yr. That is simply unheard of for an 18-22 year old student.

      It is certainly very different for someone who is not a student, and is not doing the work part time while in school. Or, for someone in school who earns multiple certifications and progresses in the techie business as a career rather than as a side job to pay the bills.

      Ultimately, I was being slightly facetious while pointing out that real-world techies in my college town and others relatively local to me are usually not earning even half of the $20/hr wage quoted by the original poster.

      Jim

  35. TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [offtopic]
    registration sites seem like a good deterrent to /.'ing, IMO.
    [/offtopic]

  36. Holy Frickin Dupe Batman! by Chiisu · · Score: 0, Troll

    Open your goddamn eyes editors!

  37. Short-term solution by overshoot · · Score: 1
    The problem is that it's a short-term solution.

    Like, about 12 minutes short. (Assuming you don't connect to your old data on a network, in which case it's even shorter.)

    At that rate, the annual cost is going to get ugly!

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  38. Reproccess? by glarvat · · Score: 1
    This seems extremely wasteful. Surely in larger cities there must be groups that are willing to take these machines off your hands, throw Linux on them and donate them to the corner cafe as a public machine.

    Seems to be a good project for a (G)LUG as an installfest, get the newbies more experience, etc.

    Anyone out there doing this??

    1. Re:Reproccess? by danincb · · Score: 1

      'd like to know too: my employer has old but functional machines to dispose of each year and we refuse to let them become refuse.

      Since we're high in the remote Rockies, it is hard to find a responsible recyle operation.

      Anyone know of affordable ways to dispose (or re-purpose) older PCs?

      Thanks

    2. Re:Reproccess? by fredbox · · Score: 0
      --
      His name was Robert Paulsen.
  39. Do the Slashdot editors read? by cytoman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm quite shocked to see so many dupes posted all the time. Do the editors scan the stories being posted, at all? They seem to be so unaware of what is already posted... the worst cases being dupes occuring on the same day (not this story).

    Seriously, I think that given that Slashdot has become so big in terms of users, the editors need to be more serious about making sure dupes don't happen... if the editors are too busy, appoint a dupe editor who will catch the dupes before they are posted. All it requires is for the dupe editor to do a search on Slashdot to see if a story has already been posted...

    1. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by garcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They have several... They are called "Subscribers". I have done by job multiple times and been thanked by the editors via e-mail at least a handful of times... Yet there have been just as many (if not more) times that I have submitted the story as being duped and it has been ignored.

      So, we are paying to do their jobs *and* we are being ignored.

      It's almost as good as being a Union employee! :)

    2. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by diverscuba023 · · Score: 1

      Here is a good idea. Have the subscribers that can see the article early provide dupe moderation. If two or three subscribers mark it as a dupe then it won't make it to the front page until it is verified as an original story by the editors. Or if the editors wish to still have it posted it can be done with an update category so that those of us uninterested can filter them. Often the dupes contain different news sources (although a lot of them recently have been the same story from same source).

    3. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      I'm quite shocked about how angry people get about dupe. It's a dupe for god sakes. At some point the article appeared on Slashdot and now it's there again. People still post comments and view ads and draw traffic to the site so Slashdot benefits.

      Instead of getting so angry about some website, calm down and enjoy the summer. If visiting Slashdot gets you so ticked off, take a break.

    4. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Really, though, what's their motivation?

      People are going to keep reading slashdot regardless of if there's a dupe everyday, so at the very least, they don't lose anything. However, they do have the potential to get increased ad revenue due to all the people who partake in the discussion a second time / complain about it being a dupe / missed it the first time / etc.

      Although it would be nice to see some other stories instead of dupes, they really don't have any great motivation to change.

    5. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's annoying and unprofessional. did you see any dupes in the new york times or the wash post?

    6. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      They have several... They are called "Subscribers". I have done by job multiple times and been thanked by the editors via e-mail at least a handful of times... Yet there have been just as many (if not more) times that I have submitted the story as being duped and it has been ignored.

      Did you print out the emails and frame them? Because they're surely as cool as a Knuth check, no?

    7. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hold people in higher regard than TeX.

    8. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Slashdot founders are millionaires (or at least they were until they blew it all on hookers and over-valued California real estate.) I imagine they have very little to do with the day-to-day operation of this blog. And, besides, dupes generate more hits by regulars who want to point out how disappointed they are, which, of course, means more ad revenue. I imagine this problem won't go away until the advertisers take notice.

    9. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hold people in higher regard than TeX.

      So...you think it's better to find problems in people than to find problems in TeX, and you think he's fixing the slashdot editors?

    10. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All it requires is for the dupe editor to do a search on Slashdot to see if a story has already been posted...
      All you should need for that is a small shell script

    11. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by megarich · · Score: 1
      Ok it is a dupe. At least I'm not losing my mind :)

      Anyhow since I didn't post my thoughts on the original I'll post it on this dupe. For me it all depends on the age of the computer. If the machine is within a couple of years old there is no reason whatsoever to dump the machine. Reinstalling windows isn't too tricky for a knowledgible (sp?) computer user and in this day and age it isn't hard to find one. Just ask around.

      Now if you have an 8+ year old piece of crap running windows 98 your damn right you should scrap it. In that case its no different than dumping a broking old t.v and upgrading to a new one because the time/effort and money to get it repaired just ain't worth it.

    12. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by haggar · · Score: 1

      Are you still a subscriber? I am curious an average subscriber how much crap will take from Slashdot before junking the subscription.

      --
      Sigged!
    13. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by Mikelikus · · Score: 1

      (obligatory)

      You must be new here :)

      --
      -- Would it be acceptable to just put my name on my sig?
    14. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by BruceCage · · Score: 1

      I have not yet looked at Slash, so I'm not quite sure what kind of features it contains (other then the ones you experience first-hand from browsing Slashdot). But getting another human editor to prevent dupes from being posted does not quite seem like the ideal solution. As you said yourself, all that is required a simple search.

      So instead it would be far more effective to make the system itself check for dupes, the easiest approach would probably be to check if the body of a previously posted story contains the exact same URL as the one currently being posted (since most stories link to outside articles), the editor could then be given a warning that he or she might be posting a duplicate article. You can think up of many other variations to this, such a searching for keywords etc.

      Personally I also happend to like the idea diverscuba023 brought to the table (http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=156255&cid =13099433), where subscribers actually interact directly with the system instead of having contact a Slashdot editor through email or other means. More user interaction seems like a plus, however as everyone knows more user interaction makes systems also more prone to abuse.

      The question is, do they really want to implement a fancy solution or put any effort into checking for dupes. Like other people said, it does not even seem like a coincidence that so many dupes get posted lately. So there might be a different motive behind these posts.

      --
      Perfect is the enemy of done.
    15. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

      As a long term, and formerly avid fan of SlashDot, I agree the dups are getting way out of hand, for such a simple problem to solve.

      I think /. runs the risk of a competing site, carring the same stories more or less (even with "as posted on /." stories :)), but with a shade more editorial care (that is, "some"). It would take much to use Slashcode, get a competing site up, reference it from /. (since people are free to post here), and draw a lot of traffic away from /.

      Come on editors, read the f'ing stories on your own site; that's all it would take to avoid dups, wouldn't it???

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  40. Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by Monte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And I emailed the "editor" telling them it was a dupe a good 10 minutes before it went live.

    Hello? [thump thump thump] Is this mic on? Come in, Rangoon...

    1. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 5, Interesting

      who's the greater fool? The editor (who already made millions of dot-com dollars from /. and doesn't have to care)? Or you who paid for a subscription so you can see dupes early?

    2. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously with minimal effort many dupes could be avoided, but I think it's unreasonable to complain when your lead time was only 10 minutes. Do you know how many emails these people get on a regular basis?

    3. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by Monte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The greatest fool is one who re-ups his subscription in light of this.

      Which I won't.

    4. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by Monte · · Score: 1

      Obviously with minimal effort many dupes could be avoided, but I think it's unreasonable to complain when your lead time was only 10 minutes. Do you know how many emails these people get on a regular basis?

      I don't know what the total time between "Mysterious Future" and "General" posting was, but it warn't a whole lot longer than the 10 minutes.

      Next time I'll try to make my email stand out more. Which subject line do you think will get noticed first:

      "IT'S A FSCKING DUPE YOU MORAN"

      or

      "NATALIE PORTMAN NAKED AND PETRIFIED DUPE DUPE DUPE HOT GRITS"

      I'm open to suggestions.

    5. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by harkabeeparolyn · · Score: 1
      Obviously with minimal effort many dupes could be avoided, but I think it's unreasonable to complain when your lead time was only 10 minutes. Do you know how many emails these people get on a regular basis?

      I don't give a flying chili-bean fart how much mail they get every day. They could at least read Slashdot like we do and recognize when a story has been submitted before. If the current editors are too feeble-minded to remember a story posted two days ago then fire them and hire someone who can remember.

      Or are web jobs the latest work program for people too retarded to push a broom?

    6. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by KillShill · · Score: 1

      as a matter of fact, it would be you for pointing it out and me for pointing out your pointing it out.

      glad we cleared that up.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    7. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by calculadoru · · Score: 1

      Wow. You mean people actually PAY MONEY for /.????
      Oh my.

      --
      The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
    8. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by BitHive · · Score: 1

      I know, right! I'm just mad I didn't think of charging for /. first.

    9. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by fuckdot · · Score: 1

      you think its not possible, but there are some sick people out there!

    10. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by haggar · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I don't understand you. Or anyone in your position: don't tell me you don't know that Slashdot has been a putrid cesspool of bad grammar and spelling, worse "reporting" and dupes, for a LONG time (since I have been reading it, in fact). In light of this, why did you ever subscribe?

      --
      Sigged!
    11. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by Monte · · Score: 1

      I thought that with the ability to email the editor on Mysterious Future articles, I could Make a Differnce. Y'know, try to fix the system playing by their rules, from the inside.

      But I was young and idealistic then. Now that the truth has come crashing down on me I have turned bitter and cynical.

      HTH. HAND.

  41. Can't think of a oneliner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't think of a oneliner to end your article for slashdot? Check the comments from the previous time the subject got posted. That's what Morganx did and Timothy likes it that way.

  42. In related news... by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...some Slashdot editors have found it cheaper to just approve dupes rather than screening for them.

    Crow T. Trollbot

  43. Subscribers can do something about dupes? by amyhughes · · Score: 1

    Subscribers get the article in advance and are offered a chance to submit any major problems with it before it goes live for non-subscribers. Does anyone submit dupe-ness as a major problem, and if so, is that not a good reason to pull an article?

  44. Maybe there isn't a recovery CD? by mveloso · · Score: 1

    I remember a while back getting a PC that had no discs - it was all on the local drive.

    If you got something like that, you'd be screwed.

    1. Re:Maybe there isn't a recovery CD? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Sony Vaios are like that. Press F10 after the bios but before Windows loads and it will start the recovery process. Besides, all those medialess recovery computers still let you create recovery discs.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:Maybe there isn't a recovery CD? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Usually it was in a "hidden" partition. Old school serious viruses would damage them, but the high-level spyware and scripts of today wouldn't touch them.

  45. It's not uranium in your smoke detector... by PornMaster · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's Americium-241.

    For more info on americium, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americium

    1. Re:It's not uranium in your smoke detector... by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

      Wow, that would be kinda fun sometime to get a bunch of smoke detectors and remove their Americium and make an atomic car with it. With a half life of 400+ years, I bet you'd really save on gas.

      BTM

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    2. Re:It's not uranium in your smoke detector... by Rob+Carr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Go buy yourself "The Radioactive Boy Scout."

      The author's got his axes to grind, but it's amazing what the kid was able to accomplish. Frighting, but amazing.

      And sad how things turned out.

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
    3. Re:It's not uranium in your smoke detector... by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      With a half life of 400+ years, I bet you'd really save on gas.

      sarcasm
      You know what would be way cooler? Go to the hardware store and buy lead. It's really cheap, and with a half-life of 4.5 billion years, your hypothetical car would never need to be refueled!
      /sarcasm

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    4. Re:It's not uranium in your smoke detector... by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      For a moment I thought you were making some sort of comment about people who throw out perfectly functional hardware as being "ignorant Americans"...

    5. Re:It's not uranium in your smoke detector... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      You know what would be way cooler? Go to the hardware store and buy lead. It's really cheap, and with a half-life of 4.5 billion years

      ?? "Natural lead is a mixture of four stable isotopes: 204Pb (1.48%), 206Pb (23.6%), 207Pb (22.6%), and 208Pb (52.3%)." You were probably thinking of Uranium-238, which does have a half-life of 4.51 billion years.

    6. Re:It's not uranium in your smoke detector... by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was thinking of Lead 207.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    7. Re:It's not uranium in your smoke detector... by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      After further review, I apparently looked up the wrong number.

      The point I was trying to allude to is that long half-life implies little energy is available from the decay. Instead of requiring fewer refuelings, longer half-lifes in the fuel would require more fuel be carried, although it would be used more slowly. The absurd extreme is that stable isotopes would last forever, but be useless as fuel.

      Sorry about the botched attempt at humor.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
  46. ObQuirk! by overshoot · · Score: 4, Funny
    I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

    Objection, Your Honor! Assumes digital media not in evidence!

    Last I heard, MS was prohibiting OEMs from shipping recovery CDs. That hard drive is all you get.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:ObQuirk! by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      When was this? I bought an Averatec laptop in March of 2004, and it came with a Windows XP recovery CD.

    2. Re:ObQuirk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I heard, Richard Stallman had become a Republican Senator from Nebraska.

      Let's just all rattle off our rumors and show our ignorance.

    3. Re:ObQuirk! by ocelotbob · · Score: 5, Informative

      They can't ship an OEM copy of XP; if they ship a CD, which most makers do, they have to ship a recovery disc locked to that model of computer.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    4. Re:ObQuirk! by nuknuk · · Score: 1

      this is true. Dell currently ships a blue or green CD labeled "recovery disk' that has the OS packaged along with all of their drivers and software.

      Many manufacturers also create a hidden 'recovery partition' allowing you to hit a key during the boot process and restore it to factory defaults...this isn't anything new either. It's been around (on laptops at least) for at least 10 years.

      That doesn't mean people want to figure that out. I've had several people who i do on the side desktop support for me end up calling me later saying that they got their computer infected again, and go frustrated so they went and bought a new computer. I quietly inquire as to what they plan to do with the old computer, and offer to buy it off of them (they often give it to me for free).

      Not to mention, the new hardware hardly keeps them from being infected again, so those with lots of money and little patience will be upgrading often! Time to start dumpster diving outside of rich powerful executives' houses.

      --
      You can pick your nodes, and you can pick your friends, but you can't pick your friend's nodes
    5. Re:ObQuirk! by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      True, true. Which makes me wonder why smart computer makers like Dell haven't invested in ways to harden XP so that it's still easy to use, but makes installing software just enough of a pain in the ass as to not be worth it for silly spyware things like weatherbug. I'd say that's the big reason why windows is in the state it's in right now; installing should make you have to type in your password. Period. Sort of a "are you really sure you want to do this" sort of thing that's not bypassed with a "don't ask me this again" screen.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    6. Re:ObQuirk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meh, i should have grammar checked. my apologies.

      "I've had several people who i do on-the-side desktop support for end up calling me later saying that they infected their computer again, and got so frustrated that they went and bought a new computer." etc.

      sorry :)

    7. Re:ObQuirk! by kjots · · Score: 1

      > True, true. Which makes me wonder why smart computer makers like Dell haven't invested in ways to harden XP [...]

      Because (drumroll, please ... thank you) Windows XP is a Closed Source Proprietory program, and nobody but Microsoft decides what happens to it. Ba-da-Boom!

    8. Re:ObQuirk! by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      True, but there are apis for things like adding users, and programs that run on startup. hardening windows isn't as hard as people think, but at the same time, is a lot more difficult than it needs to be.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    9. Re:ObQuirk! by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Odd. I bought a Dell PC about 8 months ago, and it came with a standard XP CD (albeit it printed with the Dell logo, I think). There was another disk with the drivers on it.

      I know it worked properly, because the first thing I did was format the system and reinstall XP from scratch to get rid of all the shite 3rd party software (Sonique CD burner, endless AOL crap).

    10. Re:ObQuirk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which makes me wonder why smart computer makers like Dell haven't invested in ways to harden XP so that it's still easy to use, but makes installing software just enough of a pain in the ass as to not be worth it for silly spyware things like weatherbug.

      support Hello, Dell Support.
      user Help. I'm getting an error when I install a program.
      support What error would that be?
      user ERROR: Attempting to install potentially harmful program. Exiting.
      support And what program would that be?
      user Weatherbug
      support That program is known to contain spyware. The computer is just trying to protect you.
      user I don't care! I want WeatherBug installed NOW!

      lather, rince, repeat...

    11. Re:ObQuirk! by sir_matt · · Score: 1

      The Vaio laptop I bought several months back did not come with recovery media. Instead, it came with a partition on the HD that was used for recovery. The 100GB HD that was used as a selling point was only 78GB after the recovery partition.

      If you wanted the recovery CDs / DVDs, the only way to get them was to download all of the files and burn them or spend some $$$ and order them.

    12. Re:ObQuirk! by The+Warlock · · Score: 1

      Boy, you'd think that MS would have gotten around to telling that to their largest OEM, but the last I checked (five minutes ago), Dell is still shipping normal copies of XP (albeit printed with the Dell logo) with their PCs.

      --
      I've upped my standards, so up yours.
    13. Re:ObQuirk! by cvd6262 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is not the case with my laptop.

      My HP L2000 came with a full XP Home disc. I used it to repartition the drive, reinstall XP, used the "applications and drivers" disc to choose the extra stuff I wanted, then installed Mepis on the other partition.

      My HP desktop did come with an annoying recovery partition, especially since it's not hidden and Avid automatically chooses it for content creation.

      --

      I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

  47. Especially since... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...they buy the junk with their overextended credit cards, which they have no real hope of ever paying off in their lifetimes, so what the hell does it really matter anyway?

  48. Imagine a Beowulf cluster... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

    ... of dupe articles...

    1. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      ... of dupe articles...

      running on recycled PCs that newbs left out for the trash, because a simple fuse or cord needed replacing.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  49. It is not just "people" by geoswan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It is not just "people". The article says that Tucker, the internet executive who said he bought a new machine, and threw out his old one, because getting rid of the spyware was too difficult, has a PhD in Computer Science.

    Ordinary people getting frustrated is one thing. They lack the right skills. A PhD in computer science is a whole other question.

    1. Re:It is not just "people" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A PhD in computer science does not require any skill in maintaining a computer (although that might help).

    2. Re:It is not just "people" by James_Aguilar · · Score: 1

      He must be a pretty lame PhD. The hardest thing that you might have to do is format your computer (i.e. still not very hard, much easier than lugging it down the stairs to throw it away).

      Ergo, this argument is worthless.

    3. Re:It is not just "people" by antrik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Computer science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes." -- Edsger Dijkstra

      --
      All my comments get moderated +-0, spotless.
    4. Re:It is not just "people" by frenchs · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I can't think of a better way to say it, so I'll just quote Edsger.
      "Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes."

      E W Dijkstra
    5. Re:It is not just "people" by Redge · · Score: 1

      What on Earth has a PhD in Computer Science got to do with anything?

      I recently interviewed 2 people for a 1st level Helpdesk position. One of them had a Bachelor of Information technology (Data Networking). He was unable to come up with any tools to check IP connectivity on a LAN other than than ping, without me prompting him on whether he had heard of tracert.

      The other person we interviewed was an 18 year old female that had just completed a Traineeship with the State Government in IT.

      Needless to say, she got the job. The Uni graduate was useless.

      Just because you have a PhD in Computer Science doesn't mean you know anything about computers. It tends to mean you know lots about how to play politics in an academic environment and write a Thesis to please said academics. I am generalising here, and I apologise if this insults any PhD's out there. But I am sure that won't stop you from having a go at me!

    6. Re:It is not just "people" by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

      I've seen this comment posted before on Slashdot that I find amusing (though I'm not sure if there is a person this has previously been attributed to):

      Someone with a PhD is a person who knows more and more and less and less, until eventually they know everything there is to know about absolutely nothing.

      That said, I plan to get my PhD one day. :)

    7. Re:It is not just "people" by homeslice3 · · Score: 1

      Do you expect a guy with a PHD to understand how to fix his toaster if it's busted or his blender? Computers are becoming the same thing - simple appliances that do a few things well (surf the web, write a document).

    8. Re:It is not just "people" by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      But I'll bet that more (if not most) astronomers take the time to understand telescopes so they can better understand how to apply them to astronomy.

    9. Re:It is not just "people" by James_Aguilar · · Score: 1

      The computer science he's talking about is not the kind practiced by most CS PhDs. Although I understand where he's coming from, I find his pronouncement just slightly arrogant or else he's just entirely missing the point. CS has expanded beyond what Djikstra was talking about.

    10. Re:It is not just "people" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      piled higher and deeper it is then.

    11. Re:It is not just "people" by James_Aguilar · · Score: 1

      I suppose for a helpdesk position, this is fine. OTOH, if ping is good enough to get the job done (and it is), then I don't understand the point of making a decision based on tracert.

    12. Re:It is not just "people" by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      And to think of it another way:

      He's an "internet executive", which means his time is probably worth MUCH more than the average /.er and it's easier to dump an hour's worth of pay on a new system than futz with it. He probably has a family that he actually spends time with, as well. :(

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    13. Re:It is not just "people" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the computer was old and not really worth wasting the time to reinstall when he could just go buy a faster computer without all of the shit installed on it?

      Computer science is applied mathematics, not "I like to install Windows on my old shitty computer."

    14. Re:It is not just "people" by megarich · · Score: 1
      I'll have a go with you :). I feel phd's are useless unless you want to be a professor. I'm sure there are some applicable cases but in general, unless you want to teach or work in a NASA type job, there isn't a need to have one.

      I may come off bad and stupid for saying this but can't learn if you can't ask, what network tools do you recommend? And there isn't anything wrong with ping if you want to check network connectivity. I mean you ping a machine, you don't reach it you know it's not connected and something is wrong. Don't see why you need any other additional tools to test that unless your definition of connectiviy is broader(as in troubleshooting the connection too). In that case i stand corrected.

      For the record I do have a b.s. in c.s. For the most part it was programming and theory. It did at least get my foot into the door for Systems administration which is what I'm doing now.

    15. Re:It is not just "people" by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Well, professional astronomers will almost certainly have a degree or higher qualification in physics, and will almost certainly have done a course in optics. I'd be amazed if any Phd or Masters in astro didn't include such a module, tailored specifically towards optical telescopes (and radio telescopes, etc).

      On the other hand, I can't imagine that a PhD in CS would include advanced spyware removal technics, in much the same way as you probably wouldn't teach an astronomer how to clean glass, grind a lens or make a mirror.

    16. Re:It is not just "people" by Nrlll9 · · Score: 1

      its not whether they lack the right skills or not. Its whether its worth it for them to use the skills. If this guy earns more than $400 in the time it takes for him to reformat and reinstall his computer, he should buy a new computer.

    17. Re:It is not just "people" by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Do you expect a guy with a PHD to understand how to fix his toaster if it's busted

      Sure, if he has a PhD in toaster engineering...

      ...or his blender?

      Sure, if he has a PhD in blender engineering!

      Computers are becoming the same thing - simple appliances that do a few things well (surf the web, write a document).

      The guy has a PhD in computer science, for chrissakes! He should know better! And what was he doing there using Windows? You won't see racecar drivers prancing around in Yugos!

    18. Re:It is not just "people" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, and now we get dupe comments as well. ;)

    19. Re:It is not just "people" by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      It is not just "people". The article says that Tucker, the internet executive

      How did this guy get quoted by anme anyway? Sounds like he just liked the idea of getting his name in the press, people do dumb humiliating things for that (eg, see any "reality" TV show). Anyway, he's probably getting his new PC paid for by his company, so any excuse to upgrade to something sexier will do. Though if he were serious about his stated reasons he'd be buying a Mac Mini.

    20. Re:It is not just "people" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article says that Tucker, the internet executive who said he bought a new machine, and threw out his old one, because getting rid of the spyware was too difficult, has a PhD in Computer Science.


      Meaning what? Just because someone has a PhD doesn't mean they can't be a maroon...

    21. Re:It is not just "people" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but an astronomer at least knows how to clean a telescope lens when it is dirty.

  50. Reminds me.. by Idealius · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..of a guy I was phone supporting whom lived in Queens, New York:

    Him: "Ahhh it's hopeless.."

    Me: "Nah, let's just try the next solution.."

    Him: "Ya know what would fix this up good?"

    Me: *chuckle* "What's that?"

    Him: "A 2 lb. sledge. I tell ya, 2 lb. sledge fixes EVERYTHING.."

    Me: rofl

    The accent was priceless.. the word 'sledge' must have been invented in NY..

  51. Some Slashdot Editors by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    Some Slashdot editors prefer to look at Slashdot stories from the last 2 days and post the one in the submission been that looks similar to the others.....noone knows why!

    --

    Gorkman

  52. Dupes by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 1
    Two dupes in a row! We're on a roll!

    All we need now is a Roland article...

  53. Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I work part of what the company does (not my job though) is spyware removal. A customer brought in a PC for us to look at. We were backed up with work at the time so it took us a week to look at it I guess.. the customer in the mean-time decided not to bother with it, bought a new PC and told us to "toss the old one in the dumpster" (from what the tech who was working on it said anyhow). All I know is he went home with a P4 (albeit an e-machine, but still). I suppose he could have been just lieing about it.. I did notice he's not with the company anymore..

  54. Just waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for Gentoooooo!!!

  55. Re:The Dupes - The Agents have entered the Matrix. by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    Dejavu you say? Agent Smith is coming... run for your lives!

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  56. Makes sense, why not? by planckscale · · Score: 0
    Okay so some luser has a Windows 2000 P866 w/256mb of PC100 memory, that's repleat with spyware, has every type of "spyware remover" installed on it, still has 15 popups at boot time, is doesn't even have USB2 and their webcam doesn't work on it anyway. So why not trash that POS and go get a new $400 computer. What are they going to do, sell it? Who has the time and if they do sell it, how do they know the new user won't find every document they've ever written and steal their identity.

    --
    Namaste
    1. Re:Makes sense, why not? by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      Do what any responsible person would do. Zero the hard drive ELEVEN TIMES. That's what me and my friends do.

  57. Knoppix, Knoppix, Knoppix!!! by monopole · · Score: 1

    This really screams for a small Slax or Knoppix distro in write protected flash, which incorporates a hard reset with data retention (i.e. disable all added executables, retain data), coupled with removable hard drives (if the system is too beserk pull hard drive, put in new drive, reboot)

    1. Re:Knoppix, Knoppix, Knoppix!!! by poopie · · Score: 1

      Yes! If you're going to trash the box anyway, toss a knoppix cd in it, see if it works and use it as a second computer at least.

      Save landfill, and get some use out of the existing equipment.

      Most old computers are still way more powerful that Linux needs to be happy.

      PS - Request a free Ubuntu CD and install that if you want to have the OS on hard disk instead of on a bootable CD

    2. Re:Knoppix, Knoppix, Knoppix!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er... what's that about landfills?

    3. Re:Knoppix, Knoppix, Knoppix!!! by Tweak232 · · Score: 1

      Er... What's that about landfills?

      Let me lay it down for you...
      Computers are made of very harmfull components which will harm the enviroment. These can be found on the soder used to put ICs on various components. There is a radioactive coating put on hard drive platters, that is used to help store data. Basically the main problem is that pcs contain a lot of lead. The landfills are already filling up with enough crap like motor oil/diapers. So this makes it not purely enviromental, because pcs take up space in the landfills too.

  58. HA! HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forget this dupe...There's a more interesting phenomenon-in-the-making here.

  59. People dont forget the environment by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

    please recycle your spyware.

  60. A comment about people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is something wrong with people today when they are too lazy to learn anything about the tools they are using (computers connected to the internet). Throwing out a computer because it has slowed down a little is a complete waste of the customer's money and the resourses needed to build another one (but I'm sure the companies love it). I haven't read the article, but I hope the people are not also throwing away their keyboards, mice, and monitors along with the rest of it.

  61. offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume it thinks your usb drive is B:

    Try the following (if you havent already) and let me know if it works

    In bios disable the floppy drives, then try it and see if it finds it.

    Good luck

    1. Re:offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      More likely, during the text mode "start a windows xp install" screens, it doesn't even have USB support loaded.

      Probably the only real fix for this person's problem is to figure out if the SATA drivers can be slipstreamed onto the windows xp sp2 disc (along with all the other fixes since then, since God knows it's going to need them).

    2. Re:offtopic by berboot · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have had to set up several new Dell's from scratch that lack a floppy drive, yet use SATA harddrive's. I have found that the easiest way is just to find the sata drivers and slipstream them into a SP2 installation disc.

      Instructions can be found all over google, and it typically takes less than an hour or so to make a good slipstream that you can use on most every computers' installation.

      Some links i had bookmarked: Here and here.

    3. Re:offtopic by eljasbo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out NLite to slipstream service packs, hotfixes, answer files, and drivers. It works really well for all my custom windows disks. Get it here: http://www.nliteos.com/

    4. Re:offtopic by SyncNine · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most BIOSes now have the ability to accept USB devices as 'Legacy' keyboard and mouse devices. IE, my Micro$oft Bluetooth Wireless Keyboard and Mouse work perfectly in BIOS/Setup/etc -- Even though they connect through Bluetooth to the USB Bluetooth Dongle. All you need is to enable that support. Should work fine. Even on a Hell^H^H^H^HDell

      --
      To the darkened skies once more, and ever onward.
    5. Re:offtopic by wstott · · Score: 1

      Many new machines will see a usb jump drive plugged in at boot time as an atlternative boot device.

      What I do for the SATA install of XP is put the drivers on a CD and "load additional drivers" early in the setup process.

    6. Re:offtopic by ccgr · · Score: 1

      spy b ot search and destroy and lavasoft adaware can remove many smalware programs. Digging into the registry is a bit over many people's heads but the softare programs I mentioned are free and easy to use. But you get what you pay for, they can't remove everything.

      --
      http://www.bookforce.net
  62. Cheap hardware makes for strange support options. by wernst · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Among other things, I repair computers and Windows problems for a living. With the cost of new Dell Desktop PCs now at $299 (sometimes after rebate,) and with my rate being $75 an hour, the math starts to get interesting:

    If it takes 4 hours to totally clean off an severely infested PC, then they might as well get a new PC. If it only takes me two hours, then they're halfway to a new PC. Hmmmm...

    Suppose the hard drive fails, and (like a client) they haven't done a backup in a year. Suppose the PC is a 3 year old PIII PC. New hard drive: $60. Time to install Windows ME (or whatever) with all the drivers: at least an hour, but probably two. Cost: around $150 or a little more for a 3 year old PC. (Add more for software installation and network setup, and I do.) Again, that's halfway to a modern PC that is much faster, has a warranty, and has XP preloaded.

    Not that I wind up going hungry when the client gets a new PC: there's still networking, data transfer, and software installation and setup that needs to get done. But the cost of new PCs has really changed the cost-benefit of fixing versus replacing.

    Of coruse, the best part is when the client says, "Oh, and just take away that old, 'broken' PC. It is of no use to me now." Away it goes with me, because my time is free to me...

    And don't forget, my rates are CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP compared to visits from The Geek Squad. If a consumer has to go through them, then the math in favor of a new PC gets even stronger...

    I can't say I'm wild about this situation, but at least you can see why we're here at it.

  63. Really now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been a Windows user since Windows 286 came out, and I've never had a virus. Simple precautions, folks.

    1. Re:Really now by Werkhaus · · Score: 1

      I've been a Windows user since Windows 286 came out, and I've never had a virus. Simple precautions, folks.

      Me too. Never even +++FRE3 V14GRA!!!+++ had +++B1G CA$H L0AN$$$+++ any spyware +++L00k! pR0N 4 LE$$+++ either.

  64. Most famous spyware PC dumping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard of the prosecuter who thought his PC was broken beyond repair and dumped it?

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/06/dutch_pros ecutor_porn_shame/

  65. Solution for dupes by RuiFerreira · · Score: 1

    throw out /. servers and buy new ones. ;D

  66. sad... by Danzigism · · Score: 1, Insightful
    the sad thing is, people throw out their computers even if they merely THINK that that they are broken..

    this rich lady I did some computer work for had a p4 2ghz with 512mb of ram the whole nine yards.. She couldn't get connected to the internet.. so she told me to throw it away and build her a new one.. i fixed the problem easily, and had myself a brand new fuckin computer.. matter of fact, i'm using it right now.. people are retarded man.. atleast donate the shit..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
    1. Re:sad... by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

      That's funny dude! Wish I knew some rich people.... :-p

    2. Re:sad... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >people are retarded man.

      Well, your benefactor was being wasteful, and generous; convenience of upgrading wasn't a significant expense to her, and you benefitted, yet you call her retarded? I generally try to be kind to people that help me out with their largesse.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:sad... by Danzigism · · Score: 0

      I benefitted indeed. but christ, its not like she gave it to me as a special gift out of the kinds of her heart. she was angry of the fact that her computer is "BWOKEN".. told me to trash it.. SHE is retarded.. and PEOPLE that waste their money are fuckin retarded.. i could careless if I benefit from them..

      --
      *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  67. when will all you dupe Nazis.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will all you dupe Nazis realise that not every one out there reads Slashdot every fucking hour of every fucking day and sometimes, dupes are a good thing.

    Every watch the 5pm and then the 6pm and then the 11pm news in one day? Yeah, go do that and come back and post all the dupes, geeze.

    1. Re:when will all you dupe Nazis.... by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think that might be the editors' intention- to let people that missed an article the first time around have a shot at reading and commenting on it. Now, perhaps if they would post and LET PEOPLE KNOW that that was their intention, repeat articles wouldn't get flooded by 100 "It's a dupe" posts.

      Slashdot public opinion seems to be moving a bit in favor of the "It's a dupe!" crowd...Not that they're the majority, but where I saw -1 Redundant on all of the "dupe" posts a few months back, I'm seeing not only positive, but +4 and +5 moderations. If the editors are posting repeats with a plan in mind, they should say something, because it's obvious that a lot of people are regarding it as a problem.

    2. Re:when will all you dupe Nazis.... by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? "the editor's intention"? if you want to read past /. posts there are three well know perfectly workable solutions: the editors can post a "slashback", you can subscribe to the headlines email and click on what you missed or go to "Old Stories" and search or just reel 'em in....so what dope is in need of a repeat of something that was posted waaaayyyy back on Saturday? YOU may need to explain away slashdot's version of Ground hog day but the rest of us are just not interested in leftovers.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    3. Re:when will all you dupe Nazis.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is exactly why the trend is to now mod up all of the 'it's a dupe' posts. Because readers are getting sick of it and voicing their opinion.

  68. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    Time to install Windows ME You install Windows ME, and you call yourself a computer repairmen?! [spits] Away with you!

  69. Anwser is frustration... by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

    I would guess most people don't see an OS, they see a computer. When they get pissed at the OS, they are really pissed at the computer. So they throw it away. In their thinking, the Compaq running Windows XP is very different from the Dell running Windows XP. After all, the computer boxes look different.

    Maybe people think of their computer like a VCR. If it stops working, you don't get the $2 cleaning fluid tape, you throw it away and buy another.

    It is too bad these people don't donate their old computers.

    I am a person who believes it is a SCAM when colleges buy bran spanking new computers every 2 years, and use property tax to do it. Whenever I have walked around a computer lab, all I see is Word and papers being written, IE and the web being surfed, and the very occasional comp sci student writing code. All this could be done on PIII's. Hell, PII's would work, although it would take a few minutes to load software.

    There is a saying in the advertising world. Don't sell the steak, sell the sizzle. It is a shame, because often people buy hardware they will never utilize. If someone wants to check email, what good is the newest computer? Salespeople don't sell based on your needs. They want to make the largest commision possible, or push whatever product their managers told them to get out the door. And they lie to do it. I was at Best Buy, just walking around. Most of the time, the salespeople in the Computer section are so busy that it is impossible to get one (good thing in my opinion). But this time one saw me, and came up. He said "What computer do you have?". I lied, I did not want a hard sell, I just wanted to browse, so I said I had a P4 2.0ghz with XP. The sales guy said "Oh, I guess that is okay, but if you want the latest security, and more speed, our P4's have XP with the latest security updates, and they will run the latest games better".

    The SOB tried to sneak in a "latest secuirty updates" in the middle of his sales pitch, to put a seed of fear in my mind about my current OS. Gee... thanks for saying anyone can download the latest patches. Gee... thanks for trying to sell me an e-machines.

    The friendly article mentioned that "people are increasingly unwilling to take out their 'software tweezers' to clean their machines", maybe it's time for manufacturers to install a HardReset button (like in a PDA) with a 1 GB ReadOnly Flash drive, which resets everything back to factory.

    Oh God NOOO!!!! Please, no! These assholes who sell computers are already sending CD's with images only. I have a laptop which the recovery CD's are not the OS which I can configure, but an Image of the hard drive, which sets up the partitions the way Microsoft wants. I can't install the OS with a partition left over for Linux.

    Give us the freaking OS we paid for. If I buy a computer, and the OS is forced on my, that I must buy it if I want the PC, then at least give me the OS on a CD and not an image.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Anwser is frustration... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bingo! The people I've fixed their spyware problems for (all relatives, all for free) basically thought that they had a slow computer. They had no idea it was adware/spyware/malware causing the problem, no idea how to get rid of it. It was just that the computer was slow and it was time to buy a new faster one.

      The only time someone came close was when they noticed their Internet connection had a lot of pop-up ads. (And even then, they'd click on the "pop up ads" to close them, when in fact, they were image advertisements on the middle of a webpage, which when they clicked on it, would open up an ad. So then they complain that they close one ad and another comes right back up.)

      The worst Spyware that I saw was one that stuck itself into IE, I think it was eGames? Whatever the name, it would load all sorts of other spyware packages onto the computer. Malware loading malware!

      Truly. The whole thing is OUT OF CONTROL.

    2. Re:Anwser is frustration... by thebagel · · Score: 1

      It's a real shame eMachines got such a bad rap back in the day. I bought an eMachines W4682 from Wal Mart not too long ago... Pentium4 2.6GHz, 80GB hard disk, a DVD+RW, and a decent amount of RAM. Unlike the previous generations, it did, indeed, have a free AGP slot. It was probably the best non-custom computer I've ever used; it put my Grandmother's Dell (of similar specifications) to shame.

    3. Re:Anwser is frustration... by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      college's update their comptuers every 2 years for a couple reasons (i work in a college, trying to get them on a 3 year rotation, so they spend less money on new machines and more on spare parts).

      first reasons is advertising... telling prospective students that you have top of the line machines in your labs (matters little since almost every kid comes in with a brand new machine anywyas).

      second reason is that these machines generally go to other departments. at least here, they send old lab machines out to replace older staff machines (for some reason the students get the best machines).

      however... i worked in a different school as a students (a larger school) and it had multiple IT departments with multiple computer purchasers. we replaced the lab machines on a 3 year rotation (different labs during different years) and i think the old lab machines just went to university surplus rather than actual use. that was several years ago and it might be different now.

      the fact remains though... any computer purchased in the past 3 years is not obsolete. it'll run windows xp as long as it has enough ram and it'll handle word and internet browsing just fine. the only people who might have a slight issue is those doing graphics or serious coding. but for 85% of the users in a college (this figure might be low), any computer within 3 years of age is just fine.

      oh, dell still sends an actual OS cd. that's the only plus to buying from dell that i see...

      and you should've questioned that sales guy... saying something like "what's the benefit if i can download the latest security updates for free?"

      the fact does remain that many people have enough money laying around that computers are disposable now since they're so cheap...

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    4. Re:Anwser is frustration... by alienw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Colleges don't get any of your property taxes, and their computers are paid for directly by the students, often with a separate IT fee. The older computers often go to departments which don't have enough grant money to afford newer ones. If you go to a university surplus auction, you probably won't find anything faster than a P-II.

      Not to mention that new computers actually end up costing less, because they do not require as much repairs and attention from the IT people. Fans, power supplies, and hard drives start to crap out in massive quantities after a couple of years and are not very economical to replace when there are hundreds of machines.

      As far as the best buy thing: stupid people deserve to get ripped off. If you don't know anything about computers, you probably shouldn't be buying one.

    5. Re:Anwser is frustration... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes. My own experience is similar. The problem is making everyone else understand this.

      --
      C|N>K
    6. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to work for a university too and we regularly upgraded systems. One of our primary reasons was that old machines simply started wearing out. Floppy drives, CD-ROM drives, power supplies, monitors, etc. all start going bad. Yes, you can repair them, but once you have 100+ systems and stuff starts breaking fairly regularly it comes time to just start replacing entire lines of systems before failures occur. This minimizes student frustration with happening to find that broken machine.

    7. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Truly. The whole thing is OUT OF CONTROL.

      And the going rate for compromised computers is something like five cents!

      Something is very wrong with the approach to security.

    8. Re:Anwser is frustration... by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      this is one of the reasons we upgrade our systems as well. but before i started working here, they wanted to upgrade them once a year. and they're nothing to scoff at... they're P4 2.4ghz, 512 ram, 40 gig hard drive with dvd/cd-rw combo drives. they're all white box machines from a local retailer. what they want them upgraded to is P4 3.2's with dvd-rw's. they've got great video cards too... awesome gaming machines. :)

      what those of us who know the value of a dollar want them upgraded with is these small form factor machines that the guy sells... they're celeron 2.8's with 512 and on-board video. no need for anything special with the graphics or a high end processor to run word. and we can afford to upgrade a bit more often.

      but yes, we run into dead floppies (which we're thinking about doing away with in the labs and forcing kids to use their network drives or usb drives), cd-roms, and a common thing, which is weird, is dead agp slots, not video cards.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    9. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why aren't students being utilized in the repair and maintenance process? It seems to me that if a school offers a degree in computer science a sysadmin lab semester spent repairing, reconfiguring and upgrading equipment would offer "real world" experience. At the very least it would teach them not to apply for sysadmin jobs;)

    10. Re:Anwser is frustration... by TheScorpion420 · · Score: 1

      I have owned 2 eMachines computers and both were stout little machines. The last one I bought from Wal-Mart about 2 years ago, is an AMD XP 2700+ had 512 MB Ram, 80 Gig HD, 4x DVD-RW, 16X DVD, and was $800(I paid $700 because I worked for wally world) with a descent 17 inch monitor. The other is an AMD XP 2400+ with 512 MB of ram, 100 gig HD, 40x CD-RW, and a 16x DVD-ROM. I can't remember how much that one was, but both of them were well worth what I spent on them and I haven't had any problems with them at all.

      --
      If you pay your taxes you support terrorism!
    11. Re:Anwser is frustration... by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As far as the best buy thing: stupid people deserve to get ripped off. If you don't know anything about computers, you probably shouldn't be buying one.

      Man, I was right with you up until this dumbass statement.

      You are conflating stupidity and ignorance. People who are simply ignorant do not inherently deserve to be ripped off. The (original) point of the sales person is to educate a customer on the best choice for their needs.

      You probably well know that keeping up with the latest email virus symptoms requires pretty much daily monitoring of IT news. Why the fuck should Joe Average have to track something that specific just to know that he can in fact download the security patch?

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    12. Re:Anwser is frustration... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 3, Informative

      oh, dell still sends an actual OS cd. that's the only plus to buying from dell that i see...

      This is what really ticked me off when I worked for higher ed. We had a site license for every OS we used, but still had to pay the MS tax on new machines.

    13. Re:Anwser is frustration... by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

      I am a person who believes it is a SCAM when colleges buy bran spanking new computers every 2 years, and use property tax to do it. Whenever I have walked around a computer lab, all I see is Word and papers being written, IE and the web being surfed, and the very occasional comp sci student writing code. All this could be done on PIII's. Hell, PII's would work, although it would take a few minutes to load software.

      My university has its fair share of PIIs and PIIIs laying around, too. It's funny, though, that the P4s always seem to be sitting on some secretary's desk with nothing but Word, or possibly Outlook, open, while the PIIs are sitting in Chemistry and Physics labs running software they can just barely (or can't really) handle.

      That's my IT fee at work, baby.

    14. Re:Anwser is frustration... by stuartkahler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SCAM when colleges buy bran spanking new computers every 2 years
      A big reason colleges buy new computers instead of using acceptable donated machines is that having donated machines means they're all different. A lab full of random PCs is much more difficult to maintain. With identical models, if a machine dies, you can use 90% of what's left over for replacement parts. You have guaranteed compatibility and the drivers are already installed and updated to your normal standards.

      My uncle works for a tech firms that actually needs top end machines, and anytime that they actually need to do an upgrade, they just go ahead and order a dozen identical machines and upgrade a bunch of people who aren't really ready yet. They save a lot of time and money by not having to maintain a different model for each person. Just think of how much easier it is to have a mobo die and just swap the hard drive into broken down system that had the hard drive fail. As long as it's not an OS issue, or the HD doesn't fail, you can literally have a system (especially a laptop) back up and running in less than an hour. If it is an OS issue, you can essentially swap out the entire machine at once and rule out hardware failure in less than half an hour. The only downside is if the model has a common failure point, you'll be intimately familiar with it. It gives you leverage against the maker, though, to make sure they fix it in every machine. You also know what to look for before the machine actually fails.

      When he buys laptops, he gets ones with quick swappable hard drives. He can tell you in five minutes if the problem is hardware or software. If it's hardware, he's already back up and running and the old unit is getting packed up and sent back to the manufacturer. If it's software, it's his problem anyway.

    15. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As far as the best buy thing: stupid people deserve to get ripped off. If you don't know anything about computers, you probably shouldn't be buying one."

      Don't be so fucking stupid. This is like saying you deserve to be told to buy a prescription you don't need by your doctor, simply because you don't know much about medication.

    16. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Schmelvic · · Score: 1

      As someone who has worked as a full time employee at a college computer lab for over 5 years, the reason that this is a bad idea is because...

      *drum roll*

      The students don't know the first thing about maintaining a lab or administrating computers. Having a new student every six months, even just sitting behind the desk answering the occasional quetion results in TONS of training costs, and lots of mistakes. Stupid things happen when we get a new, unexperianced student coming in as a sysadmin. They will make images that completely break a machine, they don't test them, and upload them to all the machines in the lab. Then they head out for 2 or 3 days (they're all very part time) and the full time staff has to end up fixing it. Plus this causes downtime for hundreds of machines, and a ton of very pissed off lab patrons.

      Please - keep the students away from running the labs. Most of them have enough problems just using the damn computers in the first place, even the CompSci students.

    17. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Associate · · Score: 1

      No one deserves to be ripped off. But in today's world, if you don't expect someone to slip it to you, you're likely to get it big time. If I walked into Best Buy wanting to buy an HDTV and walked out with a plasma, that would be my fault. Just because it's thin and cost twice as much as comparable screen sizes, doesn't make it a good deal. Like someone mentioned earlier, you don't sell the steak, sell the sizzle. And people don't buy electronic equipment such as computers, tvs, steros, phones, usw based on the intended use. They want a thin tv with a fuzzy picture; a phone that takes pictures, plays games, surfs the web, but has crappy sound; a computer that surfs the web well for a few months then suddenly all the digital photos and music get mest up somehow. Women are often chided about choosing a car based off the color, but people in general are as ignorant about what they're purchasing.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    18. Re:Anwser is frustration... by jellybear · · Score: 1

      You do realize that most of the money doesn't go towards paying for manufacturing or natural resources, but towards technology and research (as well as marketing etc.) If everyone was a cheap-ass like you, you wouldn't be enjoying Moore's law the way you are now. So just chill, sit back, let the yuppies buy their P4 with XP and whatever, and buy last year's computer for half the price.

    19. Re:Anwser is frustration... by NexusTw1n · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you have a "campus agreement" licence then you didn't have a site licence.

      You had a site upgrade licence.
      What that means is you were entitled to upgrade any OEM version of Windows, to any other version of Windows.

      So, you could upgrade a bunch of 98 machines to XP, or "save" some money ordering XP Home on your Dells rather than XP Pro, but you aren't allowed to install XP on a white box with no existing MS Operating System.

      It is a misunderstanding many people have about the more common versions of MS site licences. It's foolish to think MS don't cover all the bases when creating such purchasing agreements. They didn't become that rich by allowing people to bypass the Windows Tax legally.

      --
      It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --Albert Einstein
    20. Re:Anwser is frustration... by tooth · · Score: 1

      Why not just replace the PCs that had the fans or HDDs that die, rather than replace the whole lot? Use serial numbers and asset tags to track the upgrades.

    21. Re:Anwser is frustration... by eth1 · · Score: 1

      "Colleges don't get any of your property taxes..."

      Universities don't, but community colleges do. Check your property tax statement. If you're not a homeowner and have never seen one, you'll usually have a city tax, school district tax, and community college district tax.

      "Fans, power supplies, and hard drives start to crap out in massive quantities after a couple of years..."

      Dell now offers 5-year warranties. I work at a school fortunate enough to be able to actually buy new hardware on a three-year cycle, but we immediately took advantage of this. The computers we cycled out this summer were P4s that could easily handle XP with a small memory upgrade.

    22. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as the best buy thing: stupid people deserve to get ripped off.

      Oh yes people deserve to be ripped off if they let it happen.. Then you wouldn't mind if i dug through your trash, or looked up your info on intelius and then got some credit cards and a drivers lic from you??

      If you don't know anything about computers, you probably shouldn't be buying one.

      I agree.. for those who wern't born with comp skills.. stay the fuck away.

      You jerk

    23. Re:Anwser is frustration... by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      funny thing is... i worked for a school as a student that had student admins and student lab admins. our resnet dhcp server was originally completely run by students. our registration system was written by students. our lab image was created and maintained by students.

      training costs aren't that high if the students already know what they're doing (there are a lot who do know, and they're generally not comp sci kids either).

      yes, there is an issue with student scheduling because they have such set class schedules that they can't just skip class to do their job. but occasionally, you'll find a good student who knows how to balance the job and classes and can do quite a bit of work for you. i wish we had more space to hire intelligent students for more admin/programming tasks and a way to pay them more money for this (max at the school i now work at is $8 for students).

      but the kicker is that you don't hire a student to do your labs or your admin work who can't work for you during the summer. the summer is when all the big stuff gets done, the rest is just minor maintenance (re-imaging a lab machine gone bad, making minor changes to the servers, etc). the lab kid has all summer to work on and get a good working lab image made that does what you want it to do. and you take the last few weeks of summer to roll the image out to all the labs and test them.

      most of the kids that i've worked with were not comp sci. they were either business, some other engineering (ME, EE, etc), bio (my major), or something else. there were a few comp sci people, but they seemed to be comp sci just so they could learn to use computers... the others did the computer stuff as a hobby... hobbiests are usually the best ones to hire.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    24. Re:Anwser is frustration... by mttlg · · Score: 1

      The older computers often go to departments which don't have enough grant money to afford newer ones.

      This is the point people (even those at colleges) don't seem to understand - even if a college is constantly buying new computers, only a small percentage of the installed base gets replaced at any given time. Back around 1997 or so, the college I went to started to get rid of its 8086-based PCs. These ancient computers had worked their way from lab to lab and from department to department until they made it to the humanities professors, which was the end of the line. At the time, computers were on a 10 year life cycle, which was a bit absurd even then.

    25. Re:Anwser is frustration... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      We had a license thru an agreement with the state and MS. Full versions of all OS's and Office suites we used were licensed, not upgrades.

    26. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Colleges don't get any of your property taxes, and their computers are paid for directly by the students, often with a separate IT fee.

      Bzzt...wrong. Thanks for playing. The North Carolina University system is HEAVILY subsidized, as our Consitution mandates an affordable education (one of the best things about NC, IMHO). I'd rather have the student workers replacing an occasional fan, vs riding around on their skateboards to pass out parking tickets.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    27. Re:Anwser is frustration... by NexusTw1n · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand me. I'm not talking about an upgrade disk that converts one OS into another. I'm talking about simply an upgrade to the licence you aquire via OEM purchase.

      So, you buy a PC with XP Home, a site licence then allows you to format that PC, and install XP Pro, or Server 2000 or Windows 98 if you were so inclined.
      The disk you use to install XP pro, or Windows 98 or whatever is the full version that will work on a cleanly formatted drive.

      What you cannot do is use it on a White Box with no OS on it. Or rather you can do it, but you would be breaking the licencing agreement. You have to have paid a Windows Tax to an OEM in order to have a basic licence that is then upgraded via your site licence.

      This is the standard site licence that MS sells. It is certainly the standard purchasing agreement offered to higher education.

      Office is different - they don't require you to purchase an OEM version of MS Works before you can install it, it can be installed on any machine, limited only by the CALs (Client Access Licence) you've purchased if you are an Enterprise, or with no limits if you are a campus.

      --
      It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --Albert Einstein
    28. Re:Anwser is frustration... by cecille · · Score: 1

      I think that really depends on what department you're in and what you're doing with the computers. There are some classes that require some real heavy-duty machines. Back at my university, we were running some fairly heavy modelling and FEA software. My year was the first to use this, but the computers couldn't handle the load from these things - you'd leave the thing solving for hours, or even overnight and when you came back there was a good chance it had crashed and you had to do it again anyway. There was some real competition to get a computer in the new lab because it was way faster and they tended not to crash as often.

      The next year they upgraded everything and fixed some of the network problems and the problems were significantly reduced. Even still, my friend was using the program for his research, and he ended up buying his own REALLY heavy-duty computer - this thing was a monster and he designed it specifically to do the type of graphics and modelling he needed. Instead of using the school computers, he'd bring this monster (full tower, incredibly heavy) with him everywhere because it solved faster.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    29. Re:Anwser is frustration... by edwazere · · Score: 1

      Dunno if it's the same in higher ed. and where you're from, but in Secondary Ed. (High school) in the UK our "Site License" is actually an upgrade from any 32bit MS operating system to XP Pro (or 2k if you prefer).

      I think a lot of MS licensing works that way nowadays.

      --
      -- You ain't seen me, right?
    30. Re:Anwser is frustration... by aliensporebomb · · Score: 1

      The spyware/adware/malware removal dance does tend
      to get a bit frustrating after awhile.

      But some of it is down to a specific user who has visited places that while not illegal or against
      corporate uses might be frowned on in some places.

      I work for a firm that allows people to use their
      home laptops on our network after we install an
      antivirus solution among other things.

      One of the things I noted with one user is she was a very heavy limewire user.

      After she had spent some time there her machine was so slow it was utterly unusable.

      She had an almost unbelievable 22,000 pieces of
      spyware on her computer.

      After removing these items the machine FELT like a
      completely different machine. Unbelievable.

    31. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Brianwa · · Score: 1

      I have a couple of eMachines - my main complaint is that they came with very loud and annoying fans that don't begin to move enough air to keep everything cool.

    32. Re:Anwser is frustration... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      No our license explicitly stated that we could load the software on ANY machine, whitebox or not. And furthermore the agreement made purchasing either an OS or Office package from the campus bookstore trivial price-wise, like $25 or so I think, if you were student, faculty or staff.

    33. Re:Anwser is frustration... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Things might have changed since I left 2 years back, but when it started (maybe 6 year ago) it was initially just the upgrade version, then the following year it changed to the full versions of the software, for use on anything. Very nice deal it was actually, one thing I give MS props for, especially since it took away so much hassle of license tracking and fear of audits.

    34. Re:Anwser is frustration... by alienw · · Score: 1

      Well, OK. Change "deserve to be ripped off" to "can expect to be ripped off". The salesperson's job these days is to make sure you buy the most expensive, high-margin item you can afford. This isn't just true for computers, it's true for cars, stereos, and just about anything that costs more than $100.

      As far as email viruses: they aren't a problem if you don't use Outlook and MSIE, don't open funny-looking attachments, and use an antivirus/antispyware program. This is something every computer user should be aware of, just like car owners know they need to change the oil once in a while.

    35. Re:Anwser is frustration... by alienw · · Score: 1

      There are a few reasons:
      1. It's a hassle and a bureaucratic nightmare. It's easier to get one purchase order approved than 100 different ones.
      2. It's more expensive. You don't get any volume discounts. You can't shop around and find the best deal if you need the system tomorrow.
      3. It's hard to support. If you replace 100 machines one at a time, you will end up with 100 completely different machines. That means you can no longer use a single image for all of them.
      4. Users get very pissed off when their computer fails and they have to wait for a replacement. It's better to prevent failures than to deal with them.

    36. Re:Anwser is frustration... by alienw · · Score: 1

      I agree.. for those who wern't born with comp skills.. stay the fuck away.

      Or go to the library and read one or two computer books/magazines. If you buy any big-ticket item without doing research, you will most likely be ripped off.

    37. Re:Anwser is frustration... by tooth · · Score: 1
      I don't know if I'd agree with ya... surprise, this is /. :) I was'nt talking about one at a time though, more like 10-20% at a time. well, heres what i think:

      1. shouldn't be a problem in a mid-sized bussisnes, make sure it's part of the budget and an annual cost. replace a third every year, no machine is older than 3 years.

      2. If you're buying that many regularly you can normally get a sales rep who can do same deals knowing that you'll be back in 12mnts for the next lot.

      3. HP, etc normally have bus. models that last for a while, plus don't do it 1 at a time, do it a third at a time. 3 types shouldnt be too hard to manage.

      4. yeah, but youll have ALL the machines start to fail near the end of the cycle, not just some of them. and you IT dept will have to do massive roll outs, not steady replacements.

      Anyway, that's about it... (sorry if this had erreors, I'm pretty tired.

    38. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      The AGP slots are probably being ruined from people pulling on the monitor cable. It's fairly common for the card to come loose on older style AGP slots without latching. I'm sure that a video card only having partial contact with the AGP slot could cause some damage.

    39. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      "real world" experience as in working with the "geek squad" at Best Buy? Sure fixing computers as a hobby is one thing, but I guarantee you there are not many jobs for just ugrading and repairing computer systems.

      Now if you actually learn how to configure networks, run servers, and install client services, that's another matter.

    40. Re:Anwser is frustration... by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      hmmm... good thought. the computers are hanging from the desks in the labs in this little strappy thing, so everytime someone knocks it with a chair or something it moves and pulls on the cables.

      thanks for the input, i'll make sure i pass this on to our lab guy...

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
  70. Yes, cheaper by far by fleener · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You want people to return their PCs to factory defaults so that their PCs just get infected again while you takes hours to download all your Windows security patches? Not bloody likely. Are you being serious, or do you work for a spyware company?

    It's far simpler to buy a new PC that has a year or two's worth of security patches already in place -- less for you to download. My uncle has already replaced one PC because of spyware. He's on a dial-up connection. He's not going to sit for hours upon hours so his old PC can reinstall security patches.

    1. Re:Yes, cheaper by far by cached · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm assuming this flamebait was purposeful?

      --
      +1 funny, -2 overrated. Life isn't fair.
    2. Re:Yes, cheaper by far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will just assume his uncle is one dumb motherfucker....probably from middle Florida.

    3. Re:Yes, cheaper by far by thebagel · · Score: 1

      MS offers CDs with security updates.

    4. Re:Yes, cheaper by far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do average people know about the security update CDs? No. End of story.

    5. Re:Yes, cheaper by far by DimGeo · · Score: 1

      Then, just do something like this: sell computers that are completely locked down from the average user. Installation of new software will be forbidden, the firewall will be turned on at all times, the only few programs on the machine will be pre-installed, and the sigle user will only be able to access a single directory on the hard drive where all the user files will be stored. Even better, have two hard drives - one expendable for the pre-installed programs, and the other one for the user files. The only bootable device will be the first hard drive. All programs will Not support any user configuration. Automatic updates on all software will be turned on at all times, the PC will require internet access at least once every 6 hours and will refuse to work otherwise, antivirus will be mandatory, and there will be support shops in which the staff will wipe out everything except for the user drive and simply flush all the programs and the latest updates to the programs drive.

      Now, That will be something comparative to the VCR - a dumb machine that will do only a few things, but do them damn well. It will certainly not be a power user's machine, but it's probably the best thing for mom and dad. Even better - make custom configurations with a pre-defined set of programs for situations like simple office use, etc. Of course, programmers, power users and gamers will need real normal PCs, but this thing will be the best bang for the buck for probably at least 60-70% of the cases. Even universities can use such machines - no more trouble with newbies.

    6. Re:Yes, cheaper by far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad no one will buy it, the same reason why people would not buy Windows XP Reduced Media Edition or N or whatever.

    7. Re:Yes, cheaper by far by DimGeo · · Score: 1

      Good point.

    8. Re:Yes, cheaper by far by psymastr · · Score: 0

      My uncle has already replaced one PC because of spyware. He's on a dial-up connection. He's not going to sit for hours upon hours so his old PC can reinstall security patches.

      This is getting mentioned fairly frequently on /.. My experience is that I can run a pre-SP1 installation without problems. I don't believe I've ever installed patches on it. I just keep the windows firewall on at all times and run some antivirus plus ad-aware.
      Also, I don't do stupid stuff like running IE. This is enough. I know that it would be better to install all the patches but I'm on 56k and I don't bother to find a CD with them because I'm ultra-lazy and if it works I don't fix it.

      --
      Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
    9. Re:Yes, cheaper by far by kirk26 · · Score: 0

      This comment is interesting? This should be labeled as "Stupid Idiot".

      --
      Linux sucks. It is an underground OS that is completely unstandardized. Linux geeks, get the fuck over yourselves.
    10. Re:Yes, cheaper by far by cthrall · · Score: 1

      It's far simpler to burn a CD with SP2 or whatever updates...

      * Unplug machine from network.
      * Reinstall Windows.
      * Insert CD and install updates.
      * Insert Norton/McAfee/whatever CD and install antivirus software.
      * Plug machine into network.

    11. Re:Yes, cheaper by far by fleener · · Score: 1

      The average user doesn't know how to burn a CD, let along a Windows CD. The average user doesn't even know they can get that CD from Microsoft.

  71. Because these are all windows machines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    All these spyware machines are running windows. Who would want those even if they were free.

    (I assume some sort of Windowsy-Intel-sponsored DRM prevents the running of a real OS on them -- if not today, that certainly seems like Intel's goal down the road)

    1. Re:Because these are all windows machines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All these spyware machines are running windows. Who would want those even if they were free.

      Exactly. The act of installing Windows on the HD converts the computer from an asset into a liability.

    2. Re:Because these are all windows machines. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Why would Intel care what OS you point on your machine?

    3. Re:Because these are all windows machines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I assume some sort of Windowsy-Intel-sponsored DRM prevents the running of a real OS on them -- if not today, that certainly seems like Intel's goal down the road)

      Get your head out of your conspiracy-theory ass and fukin learn something.

  72. 51" powerbook? by r_cerq · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, she must have spent a few grand on the crane alone ;)

  73. Man, I hope so... by boarder · · Score: 1

    I just found a PC sitting with the trash on the side of the road. In it were a perfectly functional amd barton 2500, 40GB hard drive and 128MB pc2100. I didn't find any spyware on the drive, so I think the person threw it out when they couldn't get their new 333MHz FSB cpu to work correctly on their old mobo with 266MHz bus limitation (they might know you can easily underclock it). Either that or the mobo blew up.

    I don't care, because I got a free cpu upgrade and hard drive.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  74. because the geek squad @ Best Buy by doorbender · · Score: 5, Informative

    because the geek squad @ Best Buy is charging little old ladies $300 to "fix" thier PC (when it needs rescueing from spyware) and simply add a spyware detector but not actually use it.

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
    1. Re:because the geek squad @ Best Buy by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Actually, being in BestBuy yesterday: Listened to a GeekSquad dude run the litany off to an (apparently) semiknowledgable older woman.

      "If we can figure out and fix the problem within 5 minutes, the fix is free. After that, the standard charge of $75 kicks in."
      "Can I get that in writing?"
      "Yes."

      Quite a lot of problems ARE fixable in 5 minutes. They're not all idiots or assholes.

    2. Re:because the geek squad @ Best Buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, even if they are fixible in 5 minutes, they have no incentive to do so. 5 minutes for a free fix, or 6 minutes for a $75 one, which is better? First let's try emptying the trash can and see if that helps...

    3. Re:because the geek squad @ Best Buy by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      I hope that 5 minutes kicks in after the machine boots up. It can easily take that long just for a spyware ridden machine just to get to the desktop.

  75. Retarded by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    This is retarded. The only legit part of the reasoning in this article is in the last line, which basically infers that the hardware was too slow anyway, so it was an awful lot more work to reinstall everything than it would be to buy a whole new system. I understand that -- I won't touch really old hardware for that very reason. Other than that, the claims the article makes that it might be a good idea to throw out your hw are ludicrous.

    Does anyone want to pool together funds to put in a full-page ad in the NYT quoting this article, and showing people that there is another way other than trashing their hardware?

    People just need to know how to get their current data off their computer onto CD-R, and to download a Fedora/Ubuntu/SuSE CD, and install from there.
    There could be a link on the NYT ad to a site where they can download live CDs to see for themselves how user-friendly Linux is for what most people use a computer for (WP, browsing, playing music etc.).

    I just spent 7 hours restoring a user's computer that was so trashed from viruses and spyware that it wouldn't even boot into safe mode. I think that viruses/malware will be Windows' "straw on the camel's back".

    1. Re:Retarded by Coming+soon! · · Score: 1

      I do. How do we start the fund? It should lead with "if you're gonna do it anyway, buy a Mac, other wise read on..."

    2. Re:Retarded by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1
      Maybe through something like this?

      I'm sure there would be interest in many Linux communities to support something like the Firefox full-page ad, to migrate frustrated users from Windows to Linux. However your reply is the only one so far, and my comment has a score of 1, so maybe someone needs to bootstrap this before interest would really pick up?

  76. Mod Points by ear1grey · · Score: 1
    How timely, I have mod points: can someone please invent (and then shamelessly self-promote) a plugin that lets me mod the parent story down?

    Well, if the Ed's can dupe stories, we can dupe dupe comments too.

  77. Geek Squad by C4-GodH8sMe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a memeber of the Geek Squad, I must say you make some interesting points. Mostof our business is removing spyware and viruses from machines, which, most of the time, is pretty easy. It does take us a long time though (running a lot of scans, and testing the PC to make sure it's ok). Generally, at our Best Buy store anyway, you can expect to pay $59 for a diagnostic (which basically includes runing memtest86, some DFT, Lucifer, making sure your optical drives operate, and scanning for spyware and viruses), plus $79 for "OS service" (spyware & virus removal, a repair install if necessary + removal). Not really that bad of a deal for the average user really, who really wants his or her machine back, "exactly" how it was "before". We try to tack on NAV2005 or NIS2005 ($49.99 + $10 install/update, $59.99 + $10 install/update, respectively) and Webroot SpySweeper ($29.99 + $10 install + update). As absurd as it sounds, a lot of customers believe they can not install software, and trust us to do so. The prices for in-home worst is a bit higher of course, but brining your machine to a Best Buy or GS store isn't such a bad idea to most customers. And believe me, I recommend plenty of customers just buy a new machine (cost exceeds value).

    --
    We are all Gods unwanted children. Did you ever consider he may hate you too?
    1. Re:Geek Squad by BobWeiner · · Score: 1

      Or you could just get a Mac...

      --
      The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
    2. Re:Geek Squad by bani · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      A most excellent recommendation indeed.

      If you're really ambitious, you could try This Mac.
      Beige box! Looks exactly like a wintel PC! Fool your friends!

      And if you need something portable, apple has a solution for you.

    3. Re:Geek Squad by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      As much as I like old Macs, I think this would be a better recommendation.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    4. Re:Geek Squad by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "As absurd as it sounds, a lot of customers believe they can not install software"

      Somebody tell me again how Windows is SO intuitive that ANYBODY can install software on it, but NOBODY can install software on ANY Linux.

      "and trust us to do so"

      Their second biggest mistake.

      I add up your prices and they come to approximately $240. Add on your insane onsite fees to that.

      Whereas I charge $25/hour onsite, and (if I don't fuck up) it gets done in maybe four hours or less, AND I install Ad-Aware, Spybot Search and Destroy, Spyware Blaster, AVG, and Kerio Personal Firewall (all of which are free for home use) AND tell them to use Firefox instead of IE and Thunderbird instead of Outhouse Express. After which they never have a problem again unless they're too dumb to run the updates (which some of them are.) Total cost to them: $100-150 - which I calculate is three or so times less than buying a new PC - every three months.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    5. Re:Geek Squad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see Best Buy still enjoys ripping off its customers. Let's see how many expensive and overpriced services we can tack on today.

    6. Re:Geek Squad by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      All I want to know is do they require a piss test for employment? ;)

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    7. Re:Geek Squad by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm a fan of Geek Squad but is that $25 and hour enough to cover yourself from liability when/if you do screw up and the client goes for his lawyer?

      Most of independants are one lawsuit away from out of business.

      And seriously dude, $25 an hour? You are either shafting yourself or you aren't worth any more.

    8. Re:Geek Squad by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      I'll get liability insurance when I can afford it. As it stands, the client can sue me and get nothing anyway. Besides, I have my contract (lifted from one of the national tech support franchise outfits) that says basically the client is screwed if I fuck up - other than my "no fix, no charge" guarantee.

      As for the rate, I can live cheap right now and there's a hell of a lot of competition in San Francisco - Craigslist has like 100-200 ads every single day for people doing the same thing and plenty of them charge $25/hour.

      Also, I'm NOT necessarily worth more depending on what you want done and how fast I think I can do it. But that applies to a lot of other people who charge more, too, in my opinion. Tons of bad techs out there. At least I charge reasonably.

      In any event, I'm trying to get more small business clients so I can reach a base level of income, then jack my fees up $5/hour every six months or a year until I get to a more reasonable level.

      Ultimately I don't want to do this picayune support shit, I want to do application design and implementation using open source tools and Linux migration for more serious money.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    9. Re:Geek Squad by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      You're living cheap in San Fran? Wow. Kudos there.

      I'm tired of the support work too, and of having to charge more (customer perception) because I'm simply much more capable and efficient than the likes of Geek Squad. I can do the same virus/spyware cleanup in 1/3 the time if not faster, but the cost is comparable, and afterward the client won't nee me again if he follows my instructions.

    10. Re:Geek Squad by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 1

      Norton Internet Security is the devil!

      If you push this software on your customers, then shame on you. Not counting Windows and spyware itself, I've charged my customers more money dealing with installation/uninstallation issues arising from NIS then any other piece of software ever.

      Considering the stories I've heard from other Geek Squad folks, you should know better.

    11. Re:Geek Squad by bani · · Score: 1

      I have a mini and I disagree. Especially with the tiger / dashboard fiasco.

  78. Fine! Just give them to me! by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

    1. Give PC to me since I know to format a hard drive properly.
    2. I format the hard drive.
    3. I install a user-firendly version of Linux, like SimplyMEPIS.
    4. I sell the system on eBay to those who are willing to try Linux.
    5. I profit!!!

    Well, I like the idea! Is not capitalizing off of people's stupidity and apathy the American way? Hell, it works for Microsoft!

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  79. How about a multiple-targeted hyperlink for the masses so we can put all the dupes behind one link???

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  80. Excess. by deemaunik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm assuming this is mainly geared towards Americans, considering it's printed in the NYTimes. But, think about the mindset for a minute. Americans are the individuals who are famous for the Biggest Trucks, Supersized Meals, Huge Homes, etc. Americans are known for their lifestyles of excess, to put it short. And before you ask, yes, I'm an American. I think this is simply people looking for an excuse to buy the new "Top of the line" systems. People will use Anything as an excuse to go buy something, when it comes down to it. Otherwise, organizations like The Home Shopping Network would never profit. "I already have three brooms, but that one has nifty rubber bristles that pick up hair!" and the like. So, if you want to get all Psychological on the situation, we're creatures of waste. =) Hell, if I had the money to do it, I'd donate the waxed PC and set the HDD on fire, then buy a completely new one too.

  81. Please tell me where and when your dumping it. by infonography · · Score: 1

    Seriously I know lots of the technically unsavy who will trade other stuff for a computer. If there is a CD key on the box I have the media and my 10 mins of time to start a wipe and install vs what ever they trade is well worth the time.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  82. a tired but true chestnut by bitbucketeer · · Score: 1

    "You'll pay for what you don't know."

    1. Re:a tired but true chestnut by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Or as the SubGenius put it, "You'll pay to know what you really think!"

      Which is why people buy Windows-based machines.

      "Bill Gates is rich, so I better buy one of his machines. The salesman said so. Also, nobody else makes computers except that strange company with the apple logo (which I don't understand), right?"

      Or maybe it's just those ads with the guys with dinosaur heads on them. "Microsoft Office has evolved. Have you?"

      Yeah, well past Bill's inability to communicate in English on why we should buy yet another version of a fucking office suite so bloated with "features" that nobody can figure out how to use any of the components.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  83. Dump "Timothy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to think people gave Timothy a hard time. But his dupe tears it. Dump the shithead!

  84. Yeah it does by Andrevan · · Score: 1

    I get "broken" computers from people all the time. At first I had to get them from the side of the road with the other garbage, but now whenever someone I know is tossing some hardware they give it to me instead.

    --
    "All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss." - Douglas Adams
  85. Some people also prefer by melted · · Score: 1

    Some people also prefer not reading DUPES on slashdot. In fact, I'm one of them.

    1. Re:Some people also prefer by Flower · · Score: 1
      Not a personal dig against you since there are so many of thses posts I could have used to replied to so please consider the "you" to be rhetorical. That said...

      So instead of wasting the half second scanning the front page, noting "dupe" and moving on you decide that it is somehow more productive (being this is /. - joke intended) to click the link to the story and then post to it with what is essentially a dupe of a "This is a dupe" comment mit your +1 bonus.

      You're not even a subscriber so the worst you have to put up with is the banner ads which also take less than a second to ignore or a little bit longer to block and then never see them again. But obviously there is no closure to this injustice until the bleating is complete.

      Forget the myths of not taking showers or forgoing exercise, etc.. IMHO, the real reason geeks don't get laid (as often as they should) is because they can't move on if their "Pedantic" button has been pushed.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  86. Even simpler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just install Knoppix, Ubantu or Mepis. The pain in the posterior factor is the same whether you are setting up a new XP box or any of the above. Actually, installing Linux on the existing box is less of a pain because you don't have to transfer your data files. Bam! You just saved your buddy $500.

  87. So, if you toss your PC full of Spyware by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    and then the neighborhood script kiddie decides to sell your private information you had on the hard disk, who should you blame?

    Well?

    Me, I blame clueless newbs who shred their bill and paystubs but dump their PC with all their credit card info on it, as well as all those nice resume's.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  88. spyware infected PC's in dumpster? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of th - no, you better not.

  89. NY Times Login by vorm · · Score: 1

    User ID and Password at bugmenot.com

  90. I know, it's pedantic but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This always bugs me... MAC (im all caps) is either "yelling" or an acronym. In fact, it is an acronym, it stands for Machine Address Code. When you're talking about Macintosh computers, there's no reason to use all caps. Just say "Mac".

  91. I blame the Jews for getting modded down too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



  92. In other news by Comatose51 · · Score: 1
    Dupes Removal: Drop Slashdot Editors in Dumpster

    I kid, I kid! Fine, mod me down.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  93. This should come as no suprise by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    People that do this kind of thing are the same people that never defrag their hard drive or scan it for errors. It gets slow and infected with viruses and spyware and they say,"Fuck Bill Gates!". They then proceed to buy another computer with WINDOWS on it and it happens all over again. People never cease to amaze me. And this is a prime example why computer techs have good job security.

    What I don't understand is, if people don't want the computer, why don't they take it to a pawn shop? They could at least get a little (and I do mean a little) cash from it.

  94. I just can't understand it by Thomas+DM · · Score: 1

    It's a dupe but I'm still wondering how that guy got his Ph.D in computer science when he can't even get his computer spyware free? My teenage sister owns a PC, I installed a few tools to protect her and she has never been infected with spyware.

    My first PC was a 386 and I have never had a virus, trojan or whatever. OK I'll admit I once had some spyware problems but that was caused by my little sister who used my PC when I was away for a few days.. It only took me a few minutes to clean the crap.

    1. Re:I just can't understand it by narcc · · Score: 1
      I'm still wondering how that guy got his Ph.D in computer science when he can't even get his computer spyware free?

      "Computer science is as much about computers as astronomy is about telescopes"
      --Edsgar Dijkstra
      I know a fellow with a Ph.D in computer science who doesn't know the first thing about MS Windows, the internet, email, spyware, etc. He's in his 80's and just never bothered to keep up with current technology.

      One of my old CS professors --with whom I've had the pleasure of working with recently-- has never had to deal with adware/spyware and thus has no idea what it is, how it works, or how to get rid of it. In fact, she earned her Ph.D in computer science in the late 70's without knowing a single thing about adware and spyware. She lets the university techs handle those sorts of problems.

      I Hope that helps.
  95. Not because of cost. by xmorg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its not because people want to pay for a new PC. People will get spyware and not understanding how a computer works, they will think its broken. Unless they have kind geek friend to help them out they are pretty much screwed. ( ever tried calling in your computer manufacturer about spyware? )

    I know alot of people who will just throw it away, and be done with computers altogether (which may be why home PC business is doing so bad.

  96. Two Dupes In A Row!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this place even worth reading anymore?

  97. My experience by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    My experience is that people won't switch because even though they're pretty hopeless with Windows, they feel like they've invested enough time to learn *something*.

    So when you suggest OS X or (foolishly) Linux, their thought isn't "Oh good, no more spyware" its more like "Oh no, I can barely work this computer and I've been using it for 5 years. If I go with the Mac, I don't know it, all my friends tells me there's no software... I'd rather live with spyware"

    I'm telling you, this is precisely what is going through most of the population's mind.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  98. DUPE by xacto · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is really going down the tubes.

  99. This is not a dupe by Flower · · Score: 1
    It is an "encore presentation." You are always free to point your browser to some other url if you have seen the show already.

    HTH,

    Flower

    --
    I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  100. Hellmouth Re:Dupe Removal by J05H · · Score: 1

    You must be new around here. We hit self-referential heights with the infamous "Weclome to the Hellmouth" articles by Jon Katz. That's before he fell in love with an Australian dog or something. There were many articles and posts and they all started mostly refering to themselves, except for when Jon posted more pseudo-relevant spewage.

    josh

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    1. Re:Hellmouth Re:Dupe Removal by cascino · · Score: 1

      Nah, it was an article entitled Message from Kabul that stands as Jon Katz's most infamous moment. The story - about a boy named Junis who loads up his Commodore after the fall of the Taliban and discovers present-day culture - had so many holes that, as a reader, it was difficult to discern if the work was merely an act of fabrication or if, in fact, Katz was truly crazy.

  101. That's how Bill gets his money. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    It seems to me that a large part of the money Microsoft gets comes from exploiting the ignorance of computer users.

  102. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You install Windows ME, and you call yourself a computer repairmen?!

    For $75.00 per hour you install whatever the customer bloody well wants.

    Windows ME, Windows 98, Windows 3.1, MS-DOS 5.0

    It is their computer, their operating system. As a repair person it is not your job, your business, or your place to force an upgrade on them if they are satisfied with what they have.

  103. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by NiTr|c · · Score: 1

    I can definitely see where you're coming. I work for a small IT company here, and we charge $90/hour for work. Luckily we have mostly small business clients, so they A) Don't get infected as badly as home users and B) Can't afford to lose all their data on the machines. So, they end up paying for us to fix them. However, we also make it a point to try and teach them what caused the issues, and how to try and prevent it later.

    Just last week I set up a new laptop for a home office. I had to move the data from the desktop to the new laptop and then do all of our typical standardizations (clean up XP). Not two days later was he infected with spyware. So, I came out again and did a full removal on the machine. Then spent some time with him. He's now a Firefox convert, as I taught him how to use that (and put in some nice extensions. He loves AdBlock and ForecastFox). He was also shown how to use SpyBot, Microsoft Antispyware, and a few other programs to at least check his PC periodically. A lot of times you can catch the problem early before the machine is totally buried. Doing so makes cleanup much easier and cost efficient.

    As has been said so often here, the real problem is educating the end user. We'll keep trying to do our small part.

    --
    Try actually thinking for yourself. It's quite refreshing.
  104. Internet Industry Exec? by Bellyflop · · Score: 1

    Seriously though - This situation is ridiculous. He has a PhD in computer science. Surely, he's figured out how to use the cup holder on his machine. And if not, he's a "Internet industry executive". Can't he bribe one of his tech support guys to fix it for him and keep his mouth shut about the pr0n stash that he has on there? Does he know any 12 year olds that could instruct him on the proper use of a Windows CD? Or is he just _that_ wasteful?

  105. Whats yours is mine by theonlynate · · Score: 1

    Hell yeah, I'm going to go dive me a new computer now. People are such suckers.

  106. No, not flamebait - recovery disks are useless by wsanders · · Score: 1

    case in point:

    I have an not-terribly-old Compaq 1710 laptop with Windows ME (I know that is worst case). It takes 2 full CDs worth of Compaq patches after the recovery disk to get this piece of crap to even function reliably. Then 5 or 6 more CDs worth of drivers and apps.

    Needless to say, we just use the machine for web surfing and streaming media. The current recovery plan is to install Linux. As far as I know, the only thing we will miss by doing that will be the Winmodem, and some distros may even have Winmodem supprot for it by now.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  107. W.....T......F... by asleepathemouse · · Score: 1

    "Mr. Tucker, an Internet industry executive who holds a Ph.D. in computer science, decided that rather than take the time to remove the offending software, he would spend $400 on a new machine."
    how in the hell could it possible be either cheaper or quicker to pitch a comp and march off and buy another one, some of the people could just claim comp ignorance. but a guy with a ph.d in comp-sci not being able to work out what a restore disk is for...come on... how hard is it really to restore a mass market co. comp these days..not very hard. most of the comps cited in the article where pretty old, and new comp or rebuild you would still ahve to burn off all your pics and misc personal items you wanted to keep. and restoring a comp is alot quicker than shopping for one and getting it. this just sounds iresponsible to me. whats next my car has a flat so i better pitch it

    --
    "tell the ones that come after me that 5 is to much"
    1. Re:W.....T......F... by Rick+Genter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if they guy makes $1000/hr, then if it takes Mr. Tucker more than 24 minutes to clean his PC, it is cheaper for him to buy a new one.

      Of course, then there's set-up time, application installation...make it two hours....

      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    2. Re:W.....T......F... by setirw · · Score: 1

      holds a Ph.D. in computer science Wow...

      --
      This message printed on 100% post-consumer recycled electrons.
    3. Re:W.....T......F... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      what happens when his new one gets infected within 10 minutes...I guess it's still cheaper for him to throw away 2-1/2 computers than work one hour on fixing them?

  108. 12 minutes... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Well, I suppose someone who can afford to use a new PC every 12 minutes, would not want to waste time removing spyware, but he can probably afford to hire someone to install proper protection on the damn thing...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  109. Lew Tucker, Ph.D. by pikine · · Score: 1

    ... is the executive of salesforce.com, a customer relations management company. Anyone can reasonably see that this is rather a "press release" article on the news, shouting "it's time to buy new computers!"

    Except their argument don't hold water. They even said that getting a new computer isn't all buds and roses, since you could get infection soon if your computer is left unprotected. They still got away because people, even the editors of nytimes.com, only read the title of that article.

    --
    I once had a signature.
  110. The interview subject surprise me... by setirw · · Score: 1

    ...one works for a dot com, and the other is a computer science teacher? They both (presumably) lack the knowledge to reformat? They should be fired from their posts instantly!

    --
    This message printed on 100% post-consumer recycled electrons.
    1. Re:The interview subject surprise me... by jlanthripp · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of economics. These people are making quite a bit of money and can thus afford the new computer, while time spent cleaning out their machines is time that they'd rather spend with friends/family/clients/etc. The time is probably worth more to them than the money.

      Let's say these guys make $150,000 a year. Dividing that out into an hourly rate we get $75 per hour (assuming 2 weeks of vacation every year and 40 hours per work week). 2 hours a month spent cleaning up virii and spyware adds up to $1800 a year for these guys. Or enough for 4 new $450 computers.

      Of course, there's still no excuse for their inability to keep the stuff from getting into their computers in the first place, but that's another matter entirely.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  111. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by wernst · · Score: 1
    ...If that's all they have a license for on the old computer, and they don't want to buy a new OS for it, then that's officially what goes on.


    Client gets what client pays for. I do not support piracy, especially when posting about it in public. ;-)


    (Spits right back at you...)

  112. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by Coming+soon! · · Score: 1

    Of course now I'm gonna sound like an evangelist but... you coulda sold him a Mac. No training and no return visit.

  113. vacancy by dotpavan · · Score: 1
    Applications Applications are are now now invited invited from from candidates candidates with with an an observant eye observant eye to prevent the to prevent the occurence of occurence of dupes^2.

    The postings okayed by the so-called editors would be scrutized by this dupe-chker-editor and then posted to slashdot. Candidates with previous experience at Slashdot NEED NOT apply.


    -Slashdot editorial

  114. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Heh, I'm sure you were just being funny. But on a serious note, if all the customer has are the OEM disks, then that's what must be used. I know ME sucks total ass, but I would never pirate XP (or any other piece of software) to a customer. Unless they are willing to pay for an upgraded OS...the software they have is all that gets upgraded.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  115. i see very few people... by KillShill · · Score: 1

    bringing up hanlons razor in regards to posting duplicate stories...

    somehow everyone instinctively knows it couldn't possibly be in error...

    i wonder where those buggers went...

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  116. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some computers need ME due to applications and/or device drivers that only run under 9X/ME. I used to have one. The manufacturer refused to release any softwafe updates that would allow it to work properly with Windows 2000 or Windows XP. They suggested that I buy a new computer.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  117. 400149 by azbrdhntr · · Score: 0

    wtf who was their math teacher. and any user with half a brain cell can figure out "google" to help them.(i hope) And on a side note dupe anyone?

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  118. SpyWare quick removal guide by seifried · · Score: 1
    1. Re:SpyWare quick removal guide by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      You mean the tool that leaves Claria spyware on your system since Microsoft is buying the company?

      Good thinking. I sure will tell my clients that. I'll tell them to make sure they use IE7 when it comes out, too, just in case the Claria spyware accidentally gets deleted.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  119. the problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is not the hardware, the problem is all in the software, give me Linux any day, and whenever i get my hands on a secondhand computer that is the first thing to go = i wipe windoze off and put Linux on and if it has a 56K Winmodem i toss it out too...

  120. Yes that is what is happening by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    The best place to find free hardware is dumpsters outside of Girls' College Dorms. Of course that's also the worst place possible to be seen, so it's better to try someone else's Girls' College Dorm. It's like a technology treasure stash. I have several friends that have gotten brand new laptops, perfectly functioning CPUs and a wealth of high value electronics.

    1. Re:Yes that is what is happening by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Yeah, but did they find any panties? You know that's what they were really looking for, right?

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  121. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I am a 20-year Mac user/owner. It is my platform of choice.

    He probably could not have sold his client a Mac. Many small businesses use specialized software that is developed for Windows only. It sucks, and frankly, having dealt with some of this software, the software often sucks as well, but that's the reality of the situation.

    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
  122. Re:Dupe Removal "Got MySQL?" by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Maybe those customized T-shirts can ask that question...

    "Know how to de-dupe your CMS? Get MySQL?"

    (C) 2005-07-18-17:26 Copyright David Syes
    Abuse this and MAKE ME RICH! I Really, really need some money... BIG money. Legally obtainable...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  123. Broken is a point of view. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've purchased a handful of used laptops/handhelds/desktops on eBay for personal use over the years. Way back when, if the listing said "broken" you could rest assured that the thing probably suffered some sort of hardware failure. However these days broken might just mean infected with viruses or brimming with spyware.

    In fact I just picked up a laptop last week that ended up being perfectly fine. There was no hardware failure at all. The notebook just had a bootsector virus (among many others) preventing an OS install and a count of over 600 malware/spyware hits. A fresh reformat and one new OS install later and it runs like a charm. But the fact remains if you don't know *how* to do these things, or are unwilling to learn, then certainly it's broken to you.

  124. Classic bad journalism by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

    "While no figures are available on the ranks of those jettisoning their PC's" What this means is that they talked to a couple of their friends who threw out their machines and decided to generalize a trend from it.

    --

    That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

  125. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? Be Happ by HungWeiWeiHai · · Score: 1

    donn't whirry...

    Bzzzt!!!! Worng anser

    I cents Conf-ooy-zhun. They need better see-ehm-ess sseestyum, aye?

    Maybe they are bots... or overwerked federal analysts (the kind with no public agency names?)

  126. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by NiTr|c · · Score: 1

    You're right. I doubt he would have gone for it though. For some people, Macs just aren't the right option. Personally, I won't ever go back to Macs. I do fine on Windows and Linux. My Windows box never gets hit with garbage, it's fast, and it runs everything. Same situation for this guy. He got a sweet new laptop, he's keen on taking care of it, it's fast, and it runs everything. He also doesn't seem like the person to like the UI of the Mac (just my opinion). For some people Macs are a fantastic alternative, for others they're not, for whatever the reasons may be.

    This past visit to the guy's house was the first in three years. He listens and learns well when we go over things with him. I doubt we'll have many problems in the near future. His new laptop should treat him pretty good.

    --
    Try actually thinking for yourself. It's quite refreshing.
  127. YAD by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

    yet another dupe... :D

  128. not until gates converts by wardk · · Score: 0, Troll

    his porn to cd

    1. Re:not until gates converts by jack_csk · · Score: 1

      given the fact that his porn fits into 640K (ya, I know he did not say that), your idea is just daydreaming.

  129. From TFA by Thaelon · · Score: 1
    The number of viruses has more than doubled in just the last six months, while the number of adware and spyware programs has roughly quadrupled during the same period, said Vincent Weafer, a senior director at Symantec, which makes the Norton computer security programs. One reason for the explosion, Symantec executives say, is the growth of high-speed Internet access, which allows people to stay connected to the Internet constantly but creates more opportunity for malicious programs to find their way onto machines.
    Sounds to me like some guy in the protection racket trying to boost sales. And how does having more innocent victims connected to the internet lead to an explosion in the number of viruses, adware and spyware programs? That's a slippery slope if I've ever seen one.

    Next why don't we ask Pepsi how tasty soft drinks are.
    --

    Question everything

  130. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by KwKSilver · · Score: 1

    Maybe it works better. I tried XP on my 1400MHz Athlon, 512MB DDR ram; 64MB videocard, yadda, yadda... XP failed after about 5 weeks. It never lasted even a month after that. Eventually gave up on XP & went back to ME-no problems. Eventually I shitcanned Win-blows altogether in favor of Linux and/or FreeBSD and gave the XP "upgrade" [puke!] disc to a friend-at least he used to be a friend, maybe not now. XP? Worst $99 I ever spent.

    --
    If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
  131. ABSURD!!! by dark-br · · Score: 1

    It's *hard* to read stuff like this!

    While ppl on under development countries work their asses off as volunteers to help poor kids to have a computer usage knowledgment rich ppl throw out their PCs.

    I've set a fundable.org account to try raising funds for *ONE* barebones computer for the public school I work in... if *ONLY* those richies could send us their 'garbage' our work would help many more children!

    Anyways, maybe YOU can help. More then 300 children will be very very thankful!

  132. re: Anti-slash by dotgain · · Score: 1
    Yeah, Anti-Slash!

    Because sitting around whinging and moaning about about /. M1 while madly refreshing and searching for keywords in your dupe database so you can be the first to bring it to attention is somehow much more fulfilling than reading slashdot topics.

    Great, not only can I be subjected still to dupes, I can access a database maintained by someone so obsessed with something that pisses them off so much, it's all they spend their time doing, and verify the article is in fact, a dupe. And find out the CID, date, editor(sic) etc! And then discuss it!

    Marvellous idea! How you guys haven't brought slashdot to its very knees already amazes me.

  133. DONATION IS THE ANSWER by javcrapa · · Score: 1

    I just finished testing some old P2, 5 of them, and we are donating them to 5 different associations for helping people wih dissabilities. Right now they dont have a single computer, and they need one. THIS is an option not making more garbage. And this donation was done by a SPORTSBOOK (for you that think this business should be shut)

  134. huh? by unkokue · · Score: 1

    I wonder why no one is telling these dumbfucks they can just type format c: and throw out the files instead of the hardware

  135. Excuse me for one moment by Azzhole · · Score: 0

    apt-get update. OK. What was the topic ?

  136. environmental cost? by sisaac · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else mortified at the thought of the environmental cost of all of this hardware going into landfills? This is just appalling.

  137. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by karnal · · Score: 1

    You install what the customer is comfortable with.

    Not what your idea of a good OS is.

    Business doesn't always mean converting everyone over to your religion just because you think it's better.

    --
    Karnal
  138. The Slashdot success plan: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Post article about dumping spyware PCs.
    2. Post article about dumping spyware PCs.
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

  139. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by writermike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know what you mean. I work in the field, too.

    But what most people don't realize is how much work they'll have if they get a new PC.

    Consider all the things that you've accumulated on your system and how much you've tweaked it -- settings, bookmarks, documents, serial keys, music, etc. You've had it for at least a year. And in all that time, you've done a lot with their PC. Do they know how to get all those settings and data to the new PC?

    Secondly, what about software? Most customers lose their original discs. Some systems don't even come with discs. Are they going to re-purchase everything? It's illegal to install an OEM Office onto a new PC. Will they buy a new Office? (No, they probably won't, but it's something you SHOULD bring up.)

    Third, there's hardware changes. What have they added? They will have to move that to the new PC, if it will work! (If the new system, for instance, had 768MB RAM and the new system uses a different type of RAM.)

    Fourth, what are they really getting with that system? There's a chance that the $199.99 powerhouse is anything but and may actually be SLOWER than what they have now!

    Finally, there's preventing this from happening again. Do they know how?

    They usually realize at this point that they're going to need help anyway. Since they can't perform these tasks, that means they're going to have to hire someone to do it. Suddenly a $199.99 PC is starting to look unrealistic.

    Of course, my OPINION is that it's better to repair than replace. I'm sure someone more clever can offer valid contrary arguments. I think replacement-as-policy (and I also put "rebuilds" under this category) is ultimately a longer road. I suggest it only if the new system is going to be much better out of the box.

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  140. I don't see any ads by melted · · Score: 1

    AdBlock rules!

  141. Idea by Adam9 · · Score: 1

    What if we made a site that mirrors /. by way of RSS, and had it automatically remove dupes and/or let people mod articles up/down?

  142. How Many Dupes Can We Achieve This Week? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    Anybody interested in starting a pool?

    I say this story gets duped AGAIN by Friday. Any takers?

    Somebody submit this story again - prove me wrong.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  143. what bothers me about this by uncadonna · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hardware is cheap, but as we all know most of the margin from these sales goes to microsoft. Talk about unfair. The people responsible for the mess get the benefit.

    The other thnig that bothers me is this constant reference to Apple's "3 per cent" market share. I swear the *majority* of computer users I see outside corporate settings are on macs; this includes a significant sampiling of 1) open sourcerers 2) cafe denizens 3) academics and 4) self-employed/very small business people. So what gives?

    Well, Apples last a long time. Suppose Apples last 3 times as long as PCs. (On the basis of this story, the ratio is probably increasing.) Then the actual market share in computer-months is about 9%, not 3%. Now suppose that Apple people actually LIKE their computers, and spend three times as much time with them. Then the user share is about 27%. About a quarter of the actual minutes people spend with computers would be with Macs. Accounting for hidebound corporations and government agencies this looks more like real life to me.

    --
    mt
    1. Re:what bothers me about this by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      Many people have frequently raised doubts about metrics used in data which says "that and that OS have so much market share". First of all, it is nearly impossible to say it about whole world - as it messures only North America (I guess), second, it mostly uses OEM data as it's main parameter, and third my pick is that it totally ignores Apple/Linux market share.
      Actually, IMHO, Microsoft is quite happy about such unsertaintity...

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
  144. Just shows you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How bad can the upper computer science curriculum be? Sounds like a poor ROI, when high school kids can clean spyware... What do us poor BS level shlubs have to look forward to?

  145. 4 hours?!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it takes you 4 hours to clean a machine you are not worth what you are getting paid.

    you are part of the problem if this is true. and it looks like it will put you out of a job.

    so either work more efficiently for lower costs. or you'll be finding a new job soon.

    1. Re:4 hours?!?!?!?! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Insightful


      It can take two IF you have EVERY freakin' tool available for deleting files that are heavily protected, hidden, etc. and you nail EVERY freakin' Registry key and hidden DLL on the system.

      Depending on the speed of the client's machine and how much hard disk he has, it can take one to two hours just to run a scan with ONE spyware tool. If you have to run more than one tool (almost always), there's at least another hour.

      THEN you have to find the stuff the tools DIDN'T find (almost always), THEN you have to clean off stuff that you found but which is hidden, protected from everything except System privilege, etc.

      Yes, it can easily take four hours. Which is why I charge $25/hour, not $90 - because most clients can't afford $90 for exactly the reason that it's ridiculous to spend $400 cleaning a $400 machine - or one they got free from a relative.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    2. Re:4 hours?!?!?!?! by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      It can take several hours to clean a machine properly, but with a workshop setup, you do not have to only clean one machine at a time.
      Our small setup has four bays and so can be cleaning four machines at a time. Plus laptops (just need a power socket).
      A lot of the time "spent" cleaning/scanning does not require interaction. Set the scans running, and ocaisianally glance over them; "Finished yet? Found much? let it run another 1/2 hour. Time for another game of Quake"
      Assuming one wants to earn $90/hr, with four machines being cleaned, one only needds to charge $22.5/hr
      Sure, one can charge $90 to each of them, but one may find that not all bays are being used, as customers choose the cheaper guy down the street.
      If one is called out on-site, then prices rise, as it takes one away from the other work.

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
    3. Re:4 hours?!?!?!?! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Only problem with a workshop setup is that either the tech has to go and pick up the machine, or the client has to drag it into the shop.

      Neither one is desireable for most people (except for lapstops, maybe). Onsite support is just that.

      Of course, offsetting that is that some people are too busy to sit around babysitting a tech onsite for four hours, too. My last spyware client allowed me to work on my own while they went to work, but a lot of people might not. (There were roommates in that situation, so it's not like I was alone in the residence, which would be a liability risk on my part as well.)

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  146. Revoke his Ph.D! by nrlightfoot · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if you can't keep your own computer free of viruses and spyware, you should have your Ph.D in computer science revoked. I have no problem with that sort of stuff at all, and my degree is in physics (bachelors), not cs. If you have too much trouble with this stuff, just follow 3 simple rules.

    1) Apply all security patches immediatly upon getting a new computer, preferably from a cd rather than the internet.

    2)Only install open source software or software you've purchased from a legit source.

    3) Don't use Internet Explorer or Outlook Express, I recommend Firefox and Thunderbird.

    --
    what sig?
  147. How About Adding This To The Editors Review Screen by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs! Check those fucking dupes!!! MORONS!!!)

    Important Stuff

    # Try to put *NEW* stories on the system instead of fucking dupes!!! MORONS!!!

    # Read other people's stories before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said!!! MORONS!!!

    [Addition of the term "MORONS!!!" is my contribution to good user interface design.]

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  148. Am I running the same OS as these people? by ChozSun · · Score: 1

    I run WindowsXP SP2 like anyone else. Sometimes behind hard and soft-based firewalls, sometimes not. My updates are set to auto download every day at 3AM.

    It is not the fact I am running SP2. I have been popup and spy/malware free since the days of Windows 2000.

    How does any living person with access to a computer keep getting spy/malware? How does a person get a popup window?

    That story blows my mind.

    --
    ChozSun
    ChozSun.com
    1. Re:Am I running the same OS as these people? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Funny


      For starters, you need to go to some other Web site than MSN or the Microsoft intranet, Bill.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  149. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by Poeir · · Score: 1

    System Shock 2 from Looking Glass, long since gone out of business, is difficult, at best, to get running under anything but Windows 95/98/ME. Actually I don't think I've ever succeeded in getting it to run on 2000 or XP, and never tried on NT.

    --
    Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  150. Cheaper?-Service with a smile-Geek Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "A typical college kid who's working as a techie in a computer store is going to expect about $20/hr for their time."

    Trust me. They're not going to get it.

    The bulk of the cost to have the shop work on your computer generally isn't going towards the help.*

    *The exception is the more experienced, and those with specialized knowledge.

  151. it's like this... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I tell my customers after a 15min. glance (free of charge), that they have 2 options:
    1) I clean it there (provided they have dsl), and it will take anywhere from 2-6 hours and after that it may still require a 2hr. re-install of the OS.
    OR
    2) I take it to my shop (where I can work on it and others and play Quake), and charge them a 2hrs. labor flat fee.

    Most choose 1, i don't know why I always recommend 2, because, hey, I love my Quake... :)

    When the bill is in the range that they could have gotten a new computer, they realize their mistake. However, I do set them up with a spyware blocker, MS' Official, Firefox for browsing (with a 5 minute WOW tutorial), and recommend them switching to Thunderbird for email, and recommend they purchase Norton for Anti-Virus (or update).

    (And yes, for most of them IE is their ISP... not kidding, 'I pay SBC, but Internet Explorer is my ISP...right?').

    I do what the customer asks, and when I point out that they are asking for the incorrect thing, they get indignant and demand their ignorance! So I provide them with that for which they ask.

    I have also had some who say 'Can't I just get a new computer and give this one to the kids?', why yes... or you could just have me get your data backed up, restore the os, and you can have it all back good as new for 2 hrs. labor... "NO, I want a new one", and so it goes.

    I got a free 1ghz. laptop that way, customer got angry said get my data off it and throw it in the trash. Passed my K6-500 compaq Lappy to my son,(Mepis 3.3.1), running good, and I get the new trash :)

    Saving data costs money and most people want that done even though they do not/will not do it before they have problems...

    What part of,"An emergency on your part does not constitute one on mine" do you not understand?

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  152. But what is your data worth? by lucifer_666 · · Score: 1
    Sure, it's easy to throw away hardware and just buy a replacement. That works for CPU's and memory. How about your data?

    Even home users who back up don't back up all that often. So how much is it worth to you to keep all that data and information you already have? $100? $200? How does that come into play when you are weighing up the cost of replacing or repairing?

    What about software installation on the new machine? How many applications need to be loaded? Special templates? Tools, layouts, systems - all take time. To get a PC back to a standard that the client is happy with (as in it has 10 or so applications loaded and configured,) takes much much longer than cleaning out some spyware.

    Sell your services to your clients better. You are trying to SAVE them money at $75 an hour. They are MUCH better off with their OLD system well maintained.

    After all, when you need an oil change, do you go out and buy a new car? No. Why? Because every car needs an oil change. Just like every computer needs they occasional crap clean out.

    1. Re:But what is your data worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all, when you need an oil change, do you go out and buy a new car?

      Wow, that's a really great analogy! Way to do math, brainiac!

  153. Quick way to save computers, fix spyware, and... by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    1. Swap drive with new one that's only large enough to hold user's current amount of data usage (save user's old drive for formatting and reuse if desired).
    2. Charge half the cost of a new PC.
    3. ...
    4. Profit $$$

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  154. So WTF happened t o the OLD trash-the-PC story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw it this afternoon on the front page, but don't see it now, did they "drop it in the trash?"

    1. Re:So WTF happened t o the OLD trash-the-PC story? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Go two pages back, it's on the July 16th (Saturday) page. See the old news link at the bottom.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  155. On site service. by Alehandro · · Score: 0

    It's actually not that cheap to get someone over
    to fix spyware. About 70$-$120 per hour. If machine is really infected it'll take up to 2-3 hours to totally clean patch and tune the machine. Almost 400$... You can buy the full system for litle extra.
    Talking about free hardware. I got stacks of mobos CPUs memorys and more. I think it's time to build my own cluster.:)

  156. from the... by Kurayamino-X · · Score: 1

    just-in-case-you-didn't-see-it-the-first-time dept.

    seriously, dude...

    --
    ...I got nothing.
  157. Re:Geek Squad good for linux! by codeconfused · · Score: 0

    This is how I get many of my machines free of charge. If you use windows, it is better to get rid of them, then to pay to have them cleaned up. For me this is heaven! Even on old machines I can install DSL "damm small linux on them. The better ones I get debian running full tilt, servers and all. For once in my life.. I can say Thanks Microsoft!

    --
    Danger Will Robinson! You are now entering a condescending Unix user zone!
  158. hmm.. by groovy.ambuj · · Score: 1

    why not only replace the hard drive instead of throwing all of the computer? ;-)

    --
    This sig doesnt exist.
  159. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Time to install Windows ME You install Windows ME, and you call yourself a computer repairmen?! [spits] Away with you!

    That's how you get repeat customers, duh.

  160. Better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A much better solution is just have the ISPs adopt a tough love policy and BLOCK spyware-infected computers (that are out doing damage to other computers) until the user calls in, admits fault, and promises to learn how to properly secure their PCs before attempting to go online again.

    Most of this is about the stupidity/ignorance of end users who have no clue. These people will get themselves infected again and again. I should know because I have a couple of friends like that.

  161. Spyware ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs to spy? Now the dumpster divers got your HD with probably more data then the spyware was raping you for.

    Feel better now?

  162. Somebody with a CS degree... by MiKM · · Score: 1

    What amazes me is that somebody with a degree in Computer Science is dumb enough to get spyware and not have backups to ensure that his computer could be functional within two days at most. What also bothered me was that the article gave the impression that spyware "just happens" - by connecting to the Internet, you can get spyware. It should have mentioned how employing a small amount of common sense can keep the computer trouble free.

    1. Re:Somebody with a CS degree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't let that "degree" stuff fool you. A lot of that is "window dressing" to put on resumes. Its needed so the hiring person doesn't look like a fool, as he sees from the certificate that someone else thinks this guy is OK. The degree mostly certifies the guy has the temperament to jump through hoops, and will likely subordinate properly in an organization. No accredited institute of higher learning passes those certificates out without at least several years of documented butt-kissing.

      The businessmen who are ignorant of what they are doing have to rely on the degree, as they are quite incapable of performing a technical interview and assessing for themselves the technical skill level of the applicant. Making a hire is a pretty expensive endeavour; its quite a costly mistake to hire the wrong applicant.

      I have seen "hiring by degree" mostly in large companies, by "human resources" types, mostly concerned with the clerical issues of the hire - there is no way these people could actually know what they are getting. You can spot their clueless "help wanted" ads a mile away... they want all sorts of certs. I won't even bother with those guys. They expect resumes saying one can raise the dead, walk on water, perfect team player, the works. There is no way I am living up to that. They have set themselves up for a big disappointment. I don't wanna be in the middle of it! They construct those ads as if they think Jesus Christ himself is gonna apply.

      The jobs I am interested in is when I can go in and talk to my prospective cohorts one on one and discuss their problems. If there is nothing I can really help with, I have to thank them for their time and go on. If I think I have something to offer, I pony up what resources I have to address their problem and see if they wanna drag me on board to help with it.

      The Director of Personnel is the LAST person I wanna see... and then only for the technicalities of getting my name, social, whatever straight for their accounting of my pay to the Government.

  163. Re:Fuck this shit [readme before modding] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you post a link to picture of you crying about it. Good bye .... LOSER!

  164. I spent the week at my girlfriend's parents house by TooncesTheCat · · Score: 1

    Went down to Nevada to go spend 2 weeks with my girlfriends parents because we are in a semi serioius relationship. My girlfriends uncle lives with his mom still, no fucking joke the guy looks like Christopher Walken. He's pretty addicted to porn and spends half his paycheck every week to go get laid at some bunny ranch. Anyways, he comes down stairs one morning all shook up for some reason. I asked him whats wrong, he said that "somehow" he got a popup for child porn ( who in the fuck has child porn popups ) anyways I didnt say anything. He was going on how the FBI would raid his house and asked how he could get rid of it. I really didnt feel like formatting his harddrive so I just said "dont know you can figure something out." He takes the case and monitor outside and proceeds to bash it in with a hammer. I witnessed the funniest thing of stupidity in my life that 2 weeks. The funnier thing was the look on his face and the fact that he bashed that monitor good and 2 took swings at the case....hard drive was still intact :O I stole it after he threw it in the dumpster and formatted it. New 120 gig Maxtor =]

  165. Re:Wanna see a Beowolf Cluster? by TonyMillion · · Score: 1

    If I had mod points I'd give them all to you. Sarcasm is wasted here.

  166. Re: Anti-slash by fuckdot · · Score: 1

    ...sitting around whinging and moaning about about /. ...

    1) if you can't spell 'whining' just use 'beaching'. It sounds much better, you phucking prick!

    2) if anti-slash can do it, why the phuck can't slashdot editors do it? Its not like they actually write these articles themselves, they just post them (occasionally, several times).

  167. Let them thrrow them away! good for me! by OsirisX11 · · Score: 1

    The weak, dumb, and stupid will be weeded out by thruth and logic.. it just takes a while :).

    Let them throw their PCs away, geeks will nab them and put them to good use, eventually the geeks will inherit the earth.

  168. Two dupe articles on the same day! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two dupe articles on the same day! Nice work editors...

  169. Dumpster Diving by localman · · Score: 1

    I'll relate a mildly shameful story:

    Early in my dotcom career (97) I was still fairly poor and excited about computers. A nearby office had just shut down and they had just thrown a whole pile of PC hardware into a rental dumpster right in front of our office. Me and a buddy went crazy dumpster diving after work -- most of it was old 386's and other stuff we weren't excited about, but there were some good SCSI controllers, network cards, and hard drives. I scooped up several hard drives -- Western Digital, but only a tiny 500MB or so. Most drives at the time were 4GB or so, and even my lousy home PC had a 2GB drive. You couldn't even buy anything smaller than that. Still, free 500MB was cool.

    At some point after playing with some of the stuff at home, I found that Western Digial covered all their hard drives for 5 years no matter what, even if you didn't have a receipt. And though this drive was a smaller one, it was actually only a couple years old. So I decided that I'd send it in for a replacement, which would undoubtedly be bigger as well. The only problem was that the drive still worked perfectly.

    So I hooked it up to a power supply that was _not_ connected to my computer and let it spin up. Then I dragged a screwdriver across the circuit board and visible sparks leapt out. It caused the power supply to safety shutdown. Then I tried hooking it up to my computer again and the drive still worked! So I went back to making it spark some more until the motor actually stopped spinning.

    Successfully destroyed, I packed it up and shipped it off to Western Digital and awaited my replacement. A few weeks later it arrived. And it was another 500GB drive. I couldn't believe they still had a warehouse of them around, just for idiots like me :)

    Anyways, I've since become financially successful enough to buy hard drives normally, and I've bought a ton of Western Digitals (only the Caviar line) to make up for it. Never had one fail, and I know they provide an excellent warranty ;) Hopefully they won't track me down now, but it's past the statute of limitations anyways :)

    Cheers.

    1. Re:Dumpster Diving by kyhwana · · Score: 1

      "Still, free 500MB was cool."
      "And it was another 500GB drive."
      SWEET! ;)

      --
      My email addy? should be easy enough.
  170. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by Schifter · · Score: 1

    It worked fine for me on two 2000 systems. I did have to bind it to a single cpu on a dual-processor machine, or it'd lock up in the first minute or so.

  171. This is why Linux on the desktop will never work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, like most people reading this forum, know how a computer works. I have recompiled kernels, work on w2k, but own a powerbook. I am handy, nerdlike, and curious about tech.

    Most people are not. Just how not? Evidently, enough that the "reinstall" option is too friggin hard, so they must rush to the store and buy a new 'pooter.

    So, if you expect THAT crowd to understand "just drop down into a shell and type rpm -Uvh foo-1.234.rpm", you're gonna be lonely.

    It's not, like you might think, that such people are stupid. It's possible they just make so much money that they cannot justify the time required to fix a borked computer.

  172. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by Poeir · · Score: 1

    Did you have to do anything exceptional? I could never get past the opening splash screen.

    --
    Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  173. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

    Generally I'd agree with this, however I'll go one further and say the best thing a person could do is invest in a custom built system, built to purpose by a skilled tech. Properly designed for safe usage and fast recovery should something go wrong.

    But thats just me....

  174. A Public Service Announcement from Microsoft by mcmediaman · · Score: 1

    We here in Redmond are becoming concerned at the amount of personal computers (PC's) being found in dumpsters. As you are already aware, recycling is a much more environmentally conscious option than throwing away. We have built a "Recycle Bin" into every version of our Microsoft Windows Operating System since Windows 95. In order to protect the environment, we ask that you refrain from disposing of your computer and instead place the offending "spyware" into our Recycle Bin. That way, the files can reinfect your computer until you download our new Microsoft AntiSpyware product. At that time, all offending files will be permanently disposed of, except for ones created by the Claria Company. Thank you, and happy computing!!!

  175. Throwing out hardware = bad by Devil · · Score: 1

    Throwing out all that hardware is incredibly wasteful. For goodness' sake, folks, just get a Knoppix CD. Boom, no more spyware.

    If you absolutely MUST get rid of your hardware, find a recycling center (computers contain lots of things like lead, cadmium, barium and mercury, none of which we need in our landfills) or to a school or donation program.

  176. omfg by deleted_soul · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If people would stop clicking on, or downloading things without reading them they probably wouldn't have spyware. Most people that call our tech support can't or won't read even the most simplest instructions even if its shaped like a cute cartoon character.

    You won't get spyware if you keep your updates on point and stay away from trash or programs people send you in your email. Don't install trash like Norton, which was good back in the day, now its just a $50 program that just warns you of viruses.

    And for the guy who said that tech support treats people like trash. Maybe you should try telling some of those degreed homosapiens that happen to think they have a clue to RTFM and STFU. They wouldn't have problems with their computer if they used common sense. People see things show up on their screen and its like neanderthals with sticks and small animals. They gotta poke it until it goes away. Nevermind the fact the info they are being given is important. Be damn if the message says its going to delete their hard drive because they'll click it twice and then say well I didn't know it was going to do that. I say if any mofo calls me and says they have had the computer for 2 to 3 years and they don't know how to turn it on they should be forced to take a computer class before they call in and ask us why that little floating plug thingy is on their monitor.

    I am sick and f'n tired of people using ignorance as an excuse. They taught you how to use context clues to solve problems in kindergarten right? So whats the f'n difference between computers and anything else.

    If TV's, Cars, Microwaves and just about everything else electronic has a switch wtf do you think a dsl modem is going to have on it. A piece of bread? Maybe some mustard? I don't think so dammit.

    I hear people every day say well it was working fine, what made it stop working. Maybe some of you retards keep forgetting things change. Stuff breaks. Don't call a multinational comglomerate and then get mad because somebody there tells you to get an f'n clue. If your computer breaks fix it, stop trying to play a victum its 2005. That shit sure isn't going to fix itself.

    Nobody with enough money to afford a computer or a college degree should be let off with any excuse when it comes to common sense. I know of thirteen states that need to send their people back to kindergarten so they can learn problem solving skills.

    --
    this sig is classified..how about yours?
  177. WD drives by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    Anyways, I've since become financially successful enough to buy hard drives normally, and I've bought a ton of Western Digitals (only the Caviar line) to make up for it. Never had one fail, and I know they provide an excellent warranty ;)

    Do they still honor such a warranty? I've had two WD's fail (a 40gig with only a couple bad blocks, an 80gig with so many that now it makes funny noises) that I bought within the last five years, with failure coincident with a CRT monitor running sitting next to the computer for a few days (no one ever said don't do that!). This was about a month ago, and they were running perfectly for years up until this. What is dissapointing is you can no longer do a "low level" format to rewrite the sector marks as you could 15+ years ago when drives were under 50 meg (and Spinrite saved the day). WD claims/implies their "write zero" utility does a LLF but it clearly doesn't.

    I asked about this (if there was any hope for the drive) on Usenet where I got mixed responses, then on the WDC website's 'moderated' forums and got a seriously patronizing response. I can only wonder if the responder has any official connection to WD, I'd hate to think that if I buy another WD drive I'd be supporting him.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
    1. Re:WD drives by localman · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they still do, but the certainly did in 97/98! I would try to get in touch with them directly and find out. If you think about it, they can't really sell two year old sized hard drives in stores any more, so running such a replacement program only costs them physical storage and shipping/administration costs. And it can have a pretty positive impact on customer loyalty. It certainly can't hurt to ask...

      Great sig, btw :)

  178. and an hour after... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ....getting it home and hooked back up to the internet they are owned again and back to square one with an infested computah.

  179. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by advocate_one · · Score: 1
    Of course, my OPINION is that it's better to repair than replace. I'm sure someone more clever can offer valid contrary arguments. I think replacement-as-policy (and I also put "rebuilds" under this category) is ultimately a longer road.

    hmmm... fat chance... I upgraded my computer mobo and processor and discovered my OEM restore disk wouldn't work with the new hardware... I had to dig around in my spares box for one of my 98SE OEM disks... to get it up... and even that was a tale of woe itself as it point blankedly refused to install as there was already an OS on the disk... I had to use Knoppix to wipe the original windows files before that 98se would install... all this hassle just for a games machine... my other boxes all run Linux...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  180. a fool and his money by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    your title just reminded me of one of my favorite bushisms:
    "There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again."

    I guess this is why ppl r rebuying windows machines, the dumbing down of america

  181. SpyWhat spy WHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read a good quote.

    computers are like a house A/C they dont work well when you open windows.... well I say if you want to stop spyware run a real os or get a MAC

  182. Am I missing something? by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    Would someone think of those homeless children who dumpster-dived and brought home (or somewhere whatever) such PC?

    Homeless children bringing it where?

  183. Are you SURE you know what you're talking about? by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    The friendly article mentioned that "people are increasingly unwilling to take out their 'software tweezers' to clean their machines", maybe it's time for manufacturers to install a HardReset button (like in a PDA) with a 1 GB ReadOnly Flash drive, which resets everything back to factory.

    Look, I'll be honest. I don't like you. I don't like your post. I think it would be best if you did not return to slashdot.

  184. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by dcam · · Score: 1

    Some computers need ME due to applications and/or device drivers that only run under 9X/ME

    9X/ME != ME. You still have the choice of running 98. It would be pretty unusual software to work on ME but not on 98.

    IMO there is no reason to be running ME ever.

    --
    meh
  185. I think you just proved his point. by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

    I've been able to boot Apple hardware from the CD since 1996 (that is my experience, I am comfortably behind the curve when it comes to hardware). Why has "wintel" been even more behind the curve when it comes to booting from alternate drives? It isn't like it was patented or something. Put the CD in, hold down the C key, and it boots, what a great idea. But if you still find floppies useful, more power to you. Thank you for keeping that old hardware useful.

    1. Re:I think you just proved his point. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      . Why has "wintel" been even more behind the curve when it comes to booting from alternate drives?

      It's not Windows or Intel, but the BIOS; i.e. the mobo manufacturers. However, my last three PCs have had a "boot from CD" option in the BIOS, I thought that was a rather universal feature. And unlike Macs, which can be choosy about which brand of CDR drive you have, just about any self-installed CDR or CDRW will boot a PC. Thus the success of Knoppix.

  186. Shit, in some of our labs, by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

    We are stockpiling old computers with ISA slots so they can use the special interface card that is utilized by 20 year old lab equipment (the Gleeble machine comes to mind, and I'm sure Gleebles are expensive, but the newer ones sure look nice).

  187. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by MWojcik · · Score: 0

    It worked for me on Windows XP and all I did was add a tweak to config file to run with my graphic card (can't remember the details, but i just googled for an error message that came up).

  188. America the beauty fool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article further proves two points already known to be true:

    1., Americans are stupid.

    2., Americans don't care a damn about the natural environment but continue to pollute the Earth to death with their consumer culture waste.

    If you consider these revelations it is easy to see why they replaced Al Gore with Dumbya.

    Hey, yankees, throw out your spyware PC, sit into your big-block V8, drive to the mall, buy a new PC, drive to McDonalds, buy 8 hamburgers and two pints of coke and complain the cup holders in your car are not large enough. Drive to the gas station and fill some 25 gallons into your car and go for a joyride to calm your nerves. Go home watch the news and wonder why all those weather disasters are happening right now.

  189. Registration free text of an article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corrupted PC's Find New Home in the Dumpster

    Add personal computers to the list of throwaways in the disposable society.

    On a recent Sunday morning when Lew Tucker's Dell desktop computer was overrun by spyware and adware - stealth software that delivers intrusive advertising messages and even gathers data from the user's machine - he didn't simply get rid of the offending programs. He threw out the whole computer.

    Mr. Tucker, an Internet industry executive who holds a Ph.D. in computer science, decided that rather than take the time to remove the offending software, he would spend $400 on a new machine.

    He is not alone in his surrender in the face of growing legions of digital pests, not only adware and spyware but computer viruses and other Internet-borne infections as well. Many PC owners are simply replacing embattled machines rather than fixing them.

    "I was spending time every week trying to keep the machine free of viruses and worms," said Mr. Tucker, a vice president of Salesforce.com, a Web services firm based here. "I was losing the battle. It was cheaper and faster to go to the store and buy a low-end PC."

    In the face of a constant stream of pop-up ads, malfunctioning programs and performance slowed to a crawl or a crash - the hallmarks of spyware and adware - throwing out a computer "is a rational response," said Lee Rainie, director of the Pew Internet and American Life Project, a Washington-based research group that studies the Internet's social impact.

    While no figures are available on the ranks of those jettisoning their PC's, the scourge of unwanted software is widely felt. This month the Pew group published a study in which 43 percent of the 2,001 adult Internet users polled said they had been confronted with spyware or adware, collectively known as malware. Forty-eight percent said they had stopped visiting Web sites that might deposit unwanted programs on their PC's.

    Moreover, 68 percent said they had had computer trouble in the last year consistent with the problems caused by spyware or adware, though 60 percent of those were unsure of the problems' origins. Twenty percent of those who tried to fix the problem said it had not been solved; among those who spent money seeking a remedy, the average outlay was $129.

    By comparison, it is possible to buy a new computer, including a monitor, for less than $500, though more powerful systems can cost considerably more.

    Meantime, the threats from infection continue to rise, and "the arms race seems to have tilted toward the bad guys," Mr. Rainie said.

    The number of viruses has more than doubled in just the last six months, while the number of adware and spyware programs has roughly quadrupled during the same period, said Vincent Weafer, a senior director at Symantec, which makes the Norton computer security programs. One reason for the explosion, Symantec executives say, is the growth of high-speed Internet access, which allows people to stay connected to the Internet constantly but creates more opportunity for malicious programs to find their way onto machines.

    Mr. Weafer said an area of particular concern was infections adept at burying themselves in a computer system so that the cleansing programs had trouble finding them. The removal of these programs must often be done manually, requiring greater technical expertise.

    There are methods of protecting computers from infection through antivirus and spyware-removal software and digital barriers called firewalls, but those tools are far from being completely effective.

    "Things are spinning out of control," said David Gelernter, a professor of computer science at Yale.

    Mr. Gelernter said his own family's computer became so badly infected that he bought a new one this week. He said his two teenage sons were balking at spending the hours needed to scrub the old one clean of viruses, worms and adware.

    Mr. Gelernter blames the software industry for the morass, noting that people are increasi

  190. computers need to be non geeky by cyclomedia · · Score: 0

    quite a lot of us are looking at it from our decades of geek experience standpoint. mere mortals (TM) want their computers to act like their microwave oven: 1. insert pie 2. set time 3. wait 4. remove pie 5. eat hence 1. turn on 2. write letter to aunt gertrude 3. print 4. turn off 5. post letter it IS the 21st century, ok so we havent got flying cars, silver jump suits and ray guns but if computers worked like the above then lots of people would be much happier with them. it's all very well spouting "gawd, all you have to do is format this, command prompt that, download the thingy, install such and such etc." do i command prompt/download/upgrade/reboot my car when i get a flat tire? no i stick the spare on and carry on with my journey, requires only a wrench and a jack. both handily seated by said spare wheel with a nice pictorial instruction booklet. try making an ikea style instruction booklet for removing spyware and viruses from your winbox. yeah i know it's all microsoft's fault, they havent exactly come on in leaps and bounds in usability since amigaos back in 84 but instead of trying to change peoples behaviour re: computers as appliances we should be striving to make (home) computers like appliances. unfortunatley linux takes it in the opposite direction, i'm a quantum physisist and i can't figure linux out!

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  191. Dupe by ozbon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amazingly, no-one seems to have complained yet that this story is a dupe of this one from Sunday.

    That must be fairly newsworthy in itself!

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  192. 4 Hours to intall Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are three parts to the job : restoring Windows, restoring apps and restoring the data.

    If Joe Sixpack would otherwise just buy a new PC, the alternative is to reformat his drive and install new copy of Windows. That does not take 4 hours or cost $300, even if you use a new shrink wrapped copy.

    If Joe wants his old data, then you need the time and tweezers anyway to extract it from the old drive, and that may well take 4 hours or more. But this cost will be the same whether he has a new PC or re-uses the old one.

    If Joe wants his particular previous apps, say Photoshop, Front Page, an accounting package and all the other other pricy Windows stuff, then you will need to install new copies of these onto the new machine. Don't even think of trying to copy these across, I've tried and it does not work. This will add substantially to the $300 cost of a new PC. Wernst admits this himself, but makes rather light of it.

    Perhaps all Dr Tucker ever uses is IE, Outlook and MS Works, and never saves data.

  193. And you are worried about computers? by lmlloyd · · Score: 1

    I love this, in a country where people trade out cars every two years, you are actually shocked and amazed that they would throw away their computers?

    Come on, a car these days costs tens of thousands of dollars, has a life span of around 20 years, and the technology hasn't substantively changed in 50 years! Yet, every couple to few years, the average American gets a new one. I don't know why, but I suppose it is because a four year-old car is just icky.

    Computers on the other hand, are improving about every six months, are completely obsolete every five years, at the outside, and only cost a few hundred dollars. Why wouldn't people throw them away?

    Admittedly, I still have just about every computer part I have bought since about '95 sitting in a bin somewhere, but I hardly ever have a use for all those parts. I also have thrown away one entire computer (sans drives) because it just pissed me off that much, and I have to say it was quite satisfying kicking it all the way to the dumpster!

    If you are going to address the problem with disposable consumerism, I think there are much more important and meaningful targets than people swapping out their crappy cheap computers for new crappy cheap computers. Hell, what about the millions of people who tossed perfectly good CRT monitors, just because they wanted a flat panel monitor with a lower resolution, and slower refresh rate, just because they thought it was cool that their monitor was only two inches thick?

    1. Re:And you are worried about computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people I know have had their cars ranging anywhere from 5 years to 15. What the hell are you talking about? Just because you know a few or heard of a few, doesn't mean, you have the GOD DAMN right to judge an entire population.

    2. Re:And you are worried about computers? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Though not the thrust of your post, cars have actually changed quite a bit in 50 years. Yes, they still use internal combustion engines, have four wheels, seats, and a steering wheel. But that's about all that modern cars have in common with cars of the 50's. I drive a 1991 Honda, and if it weren't paid for and so cheap to maintain, I'd get a new car in a heartbeat. Air bags, anti-lock brakes, and a more powerful engine are reasons enough.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  194. i of course was speaking about by doorbender · · Score: 1

    i of course was speaking about a single known instance.

    this specific machine was running win ME and had a 1ghz cpu with 128mb and 16 meg video. so with all the adware there was no chance in hell it would boot in 5 minutes.

    this "5 minute fix" B.S. further enforces the impetus to dispose of an older computer.

    I say it's B.S. because the more training one has in fixing computers (and the newer the machine) the more likely it can be fixed quickly. so the speed in fixing should be worth more. I mean really would you pay more to fix an old gremlin waiting a week to get the part or to fix a corvette whose parts are more likely to be in stock?

    Last christmas I upgraded a win95 machine to win98 for someone for $50. the hard drive was so slow that it took hours to restore thier data (10 gigs of MP3s) to thier disk. I won't be doing that again.

    300 is only worth it if your computer is fixed AND you get to keep your data.

    so to summarize 5 minutes and free is B.S.

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
    1. Re:i of course was speaking about by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      so to summarize 5 minutes and free is B.S.

      Hey..I was just going by what the GS dude said. I've never had occassion to use their services, nor would I. Neither would I send someone to them.

    2. Re:i of course was speaking about by doorbender · · Score: 1

      I meant as a scale for pricing. Not that they don't honor it.

      --
      "He's a real midnight golfer"
  195. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    If it takes 4 hours to totally clean off an severely infested PC, then they might as well get a new PC.

    That's assuming it takes zero time for the (l)user to select, order, and then take delivery of, unpack, plug in and connect, then turn on, the PC; then click through all the EULAs, then set up his network, reinstall his apps....

  196. Re:Dupe by dthrall · · Score: 1

    I stand corrected....

  197. yeah by doorbender · · Score: 1

    my boss just called me in to fix a usb drive that had been "malfunctioning" since last night. I plugged the powersupply in and "wah lah" I danced around him while he flipped me off.

    re: no licensing for PCs, "no one" (statistically compared to cars) dies from computer missuse. but I would agree that shouldn't preclude ppl learning about what they use. I mean it's 2000 freakiing 5 and ppl i work with who have been using PCs for 12 years barely know what drag and drop mean!

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
  198. I would like to know why.. by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    a person with a Ph.D. in CompSci can't recover from a malware infestation.

    As someone in school going for a compsci degree, I'd like to know which school he attended, that I may switch if it's mine.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  199. Same story, different site, no rego by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Hello, CNN.

    And yes, this /. story is a dupe.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  200. Our University uses computers much longer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although our college buys new computers for the lab every year, most computers are used around here for about 6 years or more. One year we buy new macs for the mac open lab, the next year new pcs for the pc open lab. Then the 2 year old computers get moved down to the teaching labs. After two more years in the teaching lab then they get moved into one of the studios to replace even older computers. If there are any left over after filling the studios then they are made available to faculty who have computers older than 4 years. New faculty receive start up money from the Provost office and use some of that to purchase a new computer when they start. Most faculty keep their computers about six years. Most departments don't have the money in the budget to replace computers very often. Most Profs have a computer for about 6 years and find it difficult to get their deparment to buy a new computer and some end up having to use research grant money to do so. Some still had 486s until the end of 1999. I knew one prof who had a Mac Centris 650 33MHz 68040 I think, until about 2001. As IT staff, my computer is also about 6 years old. It's a 450MHz G4 purchased new in 1999. I am getting a 4 year old computer this year, from out of the mac teaching lab, so I'll have a 733 MHz G4. Our students use more than just Word, etc.
    Autocad, Maya, ArcGIS, ArcView, 3D animation software, video editing, etc.
    The state cuts our budget every year; raises are small, etc.

  201. an OS installer should be able to figure out by doorbender · · Score: 1

    an OS installer (Program) should be able to figure out disk paths a little better.

    I am currently running a RAID 0 array on the mobo's IDE controller. 4 ata 133 disks (Sisandra says it's %14 faster than a 2 disk sata150 striped raid and it's cheaper). To get this to happen I have XP installed on a hd on a PCI IDE controller because tho i could boot from a CD on said controller the windows installer program couldn't find the cd it was booting from. So I installed from the cd on the mobos controller to the hd on the pci controller then moved the optical drives to the slave channel on the PCI controller and setup the RAID on the mobo. leaving me slightly unhappy because I was looking froward to booting from the RAID.

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
  202. Especially since by Marc2k · · Score: 1

    After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance? Why do they apply a different standard to computers?

    Especially since my computer was about twice as expensive as my first car.

    --
    --- What
  203. HP Sucks by Marc2k · · Score: 1

    Right before I went to college (Fall of 2000), I bought an HP Pavillion something-or-other, set it up to dual-boot Linux 2.2.something-or-other, and took it to school. It took me under three days to bork up the Win98SE installation to the point that reformatting/reinstalling was easier. So I reformatted the Windows drive, popped in the HP Recovery Disc, restarted, and...Oops, Sorry! You needed to have Windows already installed for their recovery cd to work, essentially meaning that the recovery cd was no more than an installer for all the bloatware that the OEM thinks you might be really interested in having on your computer. What kind of recovery is that?

    I'm still pretty pissed at HP, whatever their reasoning was. I hadn't any other OEM computer at the time not coming with a Windows install disc. I honestly wouldn't have minded if they sent a recovery disc that was locked to my computer, I just want to know that if I'm paying for an OEM license (even implicitly), I want the ability to reinstall the software on the same computer as many times as I want.

    --
    --- What
  204. Misleading article -- or should I say, ad for Dell by Archon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe the article misrepresents the options available to users.

    Someone who works in the internet industry and who holds a Ph.D. in computer science thought it "cheaper and faster" to buy another new PC running Windows. A director of a internet-related research group considers this a "rational response." Followed by a list of statistics related to Windows viruses, ad- and mal-ware. Then a professor of computer science at Yale, with another story of another infected Windows machine.

    Then a few paragraphs about Microsoft releasing software to combat the problem, noting 800 _million_ uses of the software this year alone, but then not offering any connection to how this affected the personal stories mentioned in the article. Not at all, I would guess, but then this isn't addressed.

    Then a story of a woman, a physician, solved her problem by buying a computer that doesn't run Windows. The case selected for this inclusion used nearly the most expensive possible option available, a top-end Macintosh laptop at $3K. The final two stories listed a stockbroker who is at "wits' [sic] end" and considering a new Windows-based PC purchase, and a bank manager who was the only one to clean their own computer of the offending software, albeit via a 15+ hour process of self-education and work.

    So what does a reader of this story who doesn't know that much about computers (ie, most users) learn? That very smart, very well-educated people -- even those that are computer professionals, are throwing their old Windows computers out and buying new ones because it's just too complicated or troublesome to fix the old ones. This behavior isn't questioned, but bolstered by the declaration of an important-sounding research group that claims this is a "rational response." And even if you do replace your Windows computer, it'll get infected all over again.

    The one person who buys something else other than Windows has to pay $3000 for it. The other person who teaches themselves to remove the infection and hopefully combat it successfully in the future must go through hours of self-teaching and work.

    However, the fact that this virus, mal- and ad-ware epidemic only exists on Windows is not discussed. Linux is not discussed. That the woman who bought a $3000 Macintosh could have bought a $500 Macintosh that would have offered her the same safety is not discussed. Hell, even the option of inserting a restore CD and returning the computer back to the way it was delivered to the owner is not discussed.

    These are all valid options. I'm not a Ph.D., a physician, or member of a research firm so maybe my opinions don't mean as much. I'm not an employee of a Windows-based PC manufacturer (I will mention though that I the ad that I had to click through to read this article was for Dell). But I use a Macintosh, and have used them exclusively for the past 10+ years, and have never had a single infestation. Ever. So what do I know.

    Oh yeah, that I have options. Successful, inexpensive options that were completely overlooked in this article. And after reading the article, if I didn't know any better (and ran Windows), I'd be far more likely to buy a new computer to replace my old infected PC. Maybe even with a new... umm... Dell?

  205. I just found an AMD 1.3 ... by nevdullc · · Score: 1

    Just recently,
    My wife and I were at the local Walmart and lo and behold, right next to the store, (at a donation drop off box) someone had left a pristine computer case complete with mobo, cpu (AMD Duron 1.3G) and cables, there was no RAM H/D or cmos battery (easily fixed with spare parts), I threw a cdrom into it, 256Megs of RAM and it sits in my den as a spare knoppix box.
    Why throw out perfectly good hardware, (win32 I guess). I know it was meant as a donation for the poor or whatever but I`m not rich and I couldn`t pass up perfectly good hardware just sitting at the side of the road.

    nevdullc

    --
    Cthulhu Saves -- in case He's hungry later.
    1. Re:I just found an AMD 1.3 ... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I know it was meant as a donation for the poor or whatever but I`m not rich and I couldn`t pass up perfectly good hardware just sitting at the side of the road.

      Are you confessing or bragging.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  206. Where ? by Jimboscott · · Score: 1

    If you have spyware, please drop your pc in my garden, Thanks :)

  207. What's that old saying by starX · · Score: 1

    About throwing out the baby with the bathwater?

  208. Re:Misleading article -- or should I say, ad for D by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    Good points. I was wondering myself why these people didn't just reinstall the OS. Doing that and reloading all of the programs shouldn't take more than a few hours. A pain in the neck, yes, but much better than buying a new machine! And yes, a Mac Mini would solve a lot of these people's problems. That's my advice to anyone who complains to me about infected machines. Few listen, but the ones that do are glad they did.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  209. Chinese medecine cure for spyware by Sixtycycles · · Score: 1

    the problem with american computer users and spyware these days, is that they approach keeping the computer like they do their body. when there is a problem they look for a fix. i bet none of these people buying new machines run adaware everyday. all i'm saying is that american computer users could learn something from chinese medicine. its better to constantly be checking and maintaining the machine than to only see doc when your head hurts. wubbo?

  210. "My computer is slow, I need a new one". by ayeco · · Score: 1

    The problem isn't that they are too lazy to fix it and just buy a new one, it's because they just don't know that the problem is spyware/malware.

  211. Re:Dupe by makomk · · Score: 1

    Amazingly, no-one seems to have complained yet that this story is a dupe of this one [slashdot.org] from Sunday.

    Actually, they have (scroll up), but I'm guessing the key word there is *Sunday* - lots of people who only read /. at work haven't noticed the original article.

  212. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by Schifter · · Score: 1

    Just installed the game, patched it and ran it.

  213. Stop Using IE, switch to Opera or Mozilla by Domo-Sun · · Score: 1

    Trashing your PC doesn't really solve the problem. Using another web browser does. I don't really see many people recommending Opera or Mozilla.

  214. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

    My wife just recently got OUT of the business of cleaning spyware off of people's PCs. She's been doing this for years, but lately the darn buggers are buried so deep nothing really flushes them out short of a reformat.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  215. Re: Anti-slash by dotgain · · Score: 1
    Wow, not only did you find a spelling mistake in my post, you found one in a valid dicionary word: whinging. Tricky one, that. It means "to whinge". Note "whinge" is also in the dictionary, it is not a mis-spelling of "whine".

    I'm not saying it's reasonable of the editors to ignore dupes, or run slashdot to the standard they do, but it's not that I'm complaining about either.

    Why can't the slashdot editors find the dupes? Well, why can't anti-slash run real articles? Something interesting? Just because you're able to spot someone/somethings deficiency and write detailed accounts of it doesn't make you the solution.

    In fact it puts you of the mindset that you are somehow authoritive, and do things like correct spelling on words you haven't learned yet, and no doubt continually refresh slashdot pages so you can post them on anti-slash.

  216. Psst. Hey, buddy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "OMG WTF happened to My Computer? Where's Internet Explorer?"

    I've got a blue-e icon I can let you have CHEAP.

  217. This article is a fraud by stock · · Score: 1

    This article is a fraud, because if people in New York throw $400,= PC's in the dumpster, then this City would be bum free in no time.

    Robert

  218. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by Technician · · Score: 1

    It sounds like the same reason I no longer fix VCR's.

    They used to sell for over $500 and people would pay to have a video head replaced and aligned. A new VCR is typicaly less than the replacement part.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  219. Re: Anti-slash by fuckdot · · Score: 0
    1. whinging does not mean 'to whinge'. Whinge means 'to whine' you cannot simply place 'ing' on any word and make it a process you 'moran' http://www.eskimokaka.be/images/morans.jpg ;p, only webster can!
    2. I am complaining! It is not too much to ask that slashdot editors not make something that is not news news. News is something that is 'new'! It might be news to you but to the site it is not news. news news news news news news news...
    to answer your questions:
    Q: Why can't the slashdot editors find the dupes?
    A: Lazy, or just greedy. Every page load generates them a bit of money. By posting more often, readers are duped (pun intended) into refreshing.

    Q: why can't anti-slash run real articles? Something interesting?
    A: I dont really care, they do not claim to be a news site! They are simply there to point out slashdots mistakes (exactly like you stated, * for you). If slashdot fixes the problems there will be no need for anti-slash. If this ever happens, I'm there with you.

    Slashdot is a professional news site (trying not to laugh), it doesn't even validate its html, but instead if you try to validate their site you get the following: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fsla shdot.org. This does not happen by mistake, they are blocking the validator purposely (long story, check the duped archives). Where is all the money going? You would think that some of it would find its way back into the slashcode.

    disclaimer: I am NOT associated with anti-slash, in fact I hate what they do. They shouldn't have to though!
  220. Freecycle it! by pinball10 · · Score: 1

    Check out Freecycle.org - Leave your computer at the curb, post a freecycle entry - a needy technophile will find a loving home for it before dawn. Forget the dumpster! Freecycle!

  221. Re: Anti-slash by dotgain · · Score: 1
    re: spelling

    It turns out I actually did misspell the word in the first place, but "whingeing" is in fact in the Collins English Dictionary. Again, meaning "to whinge".

    to answer your questions:

    The first question was actually rhetorical, but thanks. Anti-slash and their articles: I only piped up because someone linked to them, and was reminded of the first time I'd visited some months ago, expecting something at least vaguely competing with slashdot (I can't remember what the original post said, is was might even have been a troll). I visited again to see if anything had changed, if there was anything interesting. Indeed, it must be for some people given they have posts on their forums, but I couldn't see it being of value to many well-adjusted individuals.

    So, I thought I'd vent my spleen on it once and for all in the hope of saving a few folk from hunting through a few tabs looking for something more nourishing than "omfg fscking got modbombed wtf!?!" and plan after plan on 'how to make the moderation system work how I want'.

    If you were the slashdot crew, would you fix it? Let's just say, (because I've no idea) that slashdot is cranking the $$$. People complain about dupes, but still the $$$ keep rolling. The things people say about CmdrTaco in their sigs etc. No surprise he doesn't come here. But it cranks in the dollars for him. From what I understand of business, you treat complaints based on how your inaction will affect you in the future. In the dupe case, I'd say very little if nothing.

    Sure, slashdot sucks, but I still come here. The town I live in sucks and the council sucks but I still live here (my job is nice, though). Lots of things suck in ways you just have to ignore sometimes. That's why I think that people that spend their time running a hair-splitting, pedantic and generally unconstructive site need to take a look at themselves before they become obsessed with it. Sure, complain to timothy, or taco or whatever, you're right to, but leave it at that.

    re your disclaimer: if antislash didn't have to do what they do, I'm sure they'd find something else. What they need a wee reassessment of their priorities. It's not like slashdot's faults aren't blaringly obvious enough. Isn't it ironic that, on an articles second running, there might be 40 posts all saying "dupe!". Someone spots a dupe, but for some reason they think they'll be the only person to notice, so they must report it. And set up a domain.

    I was actually hoping you were associated with them, I was looking forward to hearing what one might say.

  222. Re:Dupe by ozbon · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I did a search for "dupe" and at the time nothing came up...

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  223. Our Mac Secret (Shhh!) by saha · · Score: 1
  224. Ghost... by pyster · · Score: 1

    I've noticed even the most savvy ppl i know dont follow practices that allow for sane and easy backups and restores. Ghost is your friend. It's like restoring your saved game. You can go and kill everyone in town, open that chest, or infect/pollute/abuse/experiment with your system, and just restore your save game. For a Winbox I suggest: 1st Drive, C, partitioned as 5 gig partition, holds: windows, small programs 1nd Drive, D, partitioned with remainder of the drive, holds: large programs, desktop and my documents directories. All other drives to hold Data (audio, video, documents, software installers, ghost backups.) When putting the system together, install windows, create a ghost of C. Install drivers, create a ghost of C. Install small core programs like winRAR, tweek, continuum/subspace, Nero, etc that will live on C, create a ghost of C. Tweek and customize. Move swap file to another physical drive, move commonly used folders to a drive that wont be over written, setup email and IM clients, etc. Create ghost of C. Install large essential programs like office, photoshop, etc and small programs with dynamic config files such as SSH, FTP, etc that will live on D. Create ghost of C. Install games that you will be playing for the next 2 years or more. Create ghost of C. Install games you are currently playing. Create ghost of C. I've been following this since ghost 3.x, and have never found a need to create an image of my D drive. Abuse your system, if it starts acting up, restore it to a previous save point. Some of your programs may save config information on C. Incorporate those into a ghost image. There are some other considerations... but you get the point...