Slashdot Mirror


XBox Released

Gallowglass writes: "Salon has written a review of the Xbox which damns with extremely faint praise." There was a big hoopla in Times Square last night, but apparently no one pied Bill Gates. So, for all you poor souls who lined up to give money to the borg: does it work? Any blue-screens yet? :) Update: 11/15 15:23 GMT by M : Okay, I'm sorry. That's green screen of death, not blue screen.

1,062 comments

  1. First@! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Heh! Doh I forgot my password..

    --gnr

    1. Re:First@! by Guns+n'+Roses+Troll · · Score: -1

      Ah, there we go. Anyway I have successfully obtained (a) first post and (b) a messy orgasm. Thanks for playing.

  2. 700Mhz Pong Machine by -douggy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can I play pong on it? If Not why not?

    1. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by SPYvSPY · · Score: 1

      You can play Pong on Dreamcast (which costs about $79 these days). Or on your PC. No need for XBOX!

    2. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      At least with a PC you get the warm feeling that you paied even more to play pong. All those cycles to waste :)

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    3. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll


      Can my cousin Jimmy blow his hot cum load up your sweet ass? There's the real question.

      If not your ass, how about your mother's?

    4. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      The Crabbing Regulations listed here are from the Delaware Tidal Water Recreational Fishing Regulations . Check their site for updates.

      Peeler 3 inches
      Soft-shell 3 1/2 inches
      Hard-shell 5 inches (except mature females)

      Crab pots may be used between March 1st through November 30th.

      Limit of one bushel per crabber.

      Mature females are identified by the rounded apron on their under side. Once this stage of development is achieved, females stop growing. Because a portion of the female population does not reach five inches before achieving maturity, the minimum size requirement has been dropped. Females bearing eggs, commonly known as "sponge crabs," may not be taken and should be returned to the water immediately.

      Recreational crabbers may use two pots without a license, however the person claiming to own the pots must tend them. These pots must be marked with all white buoys with the owner's full name and permanent mailing address inscribed either on the buoy or on a waterproof tag attached to the buoy. Recreational crabbers may use a trotline (no length limit) and any number of hand lines or traps. The recreational daily limit is one bushel per person.

      1999 Maryland Crabbing Laws
      Contact the Maryland Department of Natural Resources
      Fisheries Service for changes:
      580 Taylor Ave., Annapolis, Md. 21401
      Reinstatement of Non-Commercial Crabbing License Effective 1999.
      Sport Crab License (January1 - December 31
      Required of persons catching crabs for non-commercial purposes in the water of the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal tributaries using:

      1. More than 600 feet but not more than 1,200 feet of trotline;
      2. More than 10 but not more than 30 collapsible traps or net rings; or
      3. Mo more than 10 eel pots for catching the individual's own bait.

      MD DNR Online Licenses You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view, and print this form. Send it to the MD DNR address listed above.

      Check out their Crab Facts

      Recreational Season, Days and Times:
      April 1 - November 30, 1998, Closed Wednesdays, hours: 0530-1700 main bay, 0530-sunset in tidal tributaries, no time limit for hand lines, dip nets, pots at private piers.

      Recreational Gear Limits:

      From docks & shorelines: No more than 10 traps/rings or combination thereof per person.

      From boats: No more than 25 traps/rings or combination thereof per boat (regardles of number of people on the boat).

      Not more than 1000 feet of baited trotline per person, if more than one person on a boat not more than 2000 feet of baited trotline per boat.

      The use of Crab Pots is RESTRICTED to two pots per private waterfront property/parcel.

      A collapsible crab trap or crab net ring which is not attached to a pier, wharf, or boat shall be marked with a buoy bearing the name of the owner.

      Virginia Crabbing Laws Online from the Virginia Marine Resources Commission.
      Contact the Fisheries Service for changes:
      P.O. Box 756 Newport News, Virginia 23607 -
      Crabbing Regulations:
      Minimum size: Hard--- 5 inches;
      Minimum size limits: 5" for male hard crabs (jimmies) and immature female hard crabs, and 3-1/2" for softshell crabs, measured from tip to tip of the longest spikes. No size limits exist for peelers crabs or adult female hard crabs (sooks)

      Licensing Information:

      Any person desiring to take or catch finfish or shell fish for recreational purposes in the tidal waters of Virginia must first obtain the appropriate commercial gear license for recreational purposes (see exemptions below). Licenses can be purchased from any Virginia Marine Resources Commission licensing agents, except that crab pound/trap licenses can only be obtained from the district marine patrol officer. All licenses are valid for a calendar year and expire December 31 in the year issued.

      License tags for vessels using crab pots and trot lines must be fastened at a conspicuous place on the starboard side of the boat or on the boat's mast during crabbing season.

      Any license to use fishing or crabbing gear for recreational purposes shall be issued to an individual for his exclusive use and shall not be transferable.

      No person shall be issued more than one recreational crab pot license, nor more than one recreational crab trap license.

      EXEMPTIONS: The following activities are exempt from the licensing requirements:

      Taking by dip net, handline, or two crab pots, as much as one bushel of hard crabs and two dozen peeler crabs in any one day for personal use only.

      Annual License Fees:

      For up to five recreational crab
      For a recreational crab
      For an ordinary crab trotline up to 300
      Gear Restrictions:

      Any law or regulation applying to the setting or fishing of commercial gill nets, fish cast nets, fish dip nets, crab pots, crab pound/traps or crab trotlines shall also apply to these gear when set or fished for recreational purposes.

      It is unlawful for any person to use more than five crab pots when that person has been issued a recreational crab pot license.

      It is unlawful for any person to use any recreational gill net, fish cast net, or fish dip net to catch and possess any species of fish whose commercial fishery is regulated by an annual harvest quota.

      It is unlawful for any person using a recreational gill net, fish cast net, or fish dip net to take and possess more than the recreational bag limit for any species regulated by such a limit. When fishing from any boat, using recreationally licensed gear, the total daily bag limit shall be equal to the number of licensed people on board the boat multiplied by the individual daily bag limit for the regulated species.

      It is unlawful for any person using a recreational gill net, fish cast net, or fish dip net to take and possess any fish which is less than the minimum size established for that species. When different size limits for commercial and recreational fishermen are in effect for a species, the size shall apply to such species when taken by recreational gill nets, fish cast nets, or fish dip nets.

      Gear Marking Requirements:

      In addition to the requirements for marking commercial gill nets, crab pots and crab pound/traps, each licensee shall mark the end flags, poles or buoys of their gear with the letter "R."

      Reporting Requirements:

      Any person using recreational gear (listed under Annual License Fees) must report annually, on forms provided by VMRC, the weight and species harvested, location of harvest, days fished and amount of gear used.

      Size Restrictions:

      Minimum size limit for female hard crabs, "Jimmies," and immature female hard crabs is five inches, measured from tip to tip of the longest spikes.

      There are no minimum size limits for peelers, soft crab or adult female hard crab, "sook."

    5. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic



      Question: I would try oral sex. I'm worried because I have a terrible gag reflex ?

      Answer:

      The gag reflex you describe is not that uncommon among women. Some women gag at the mere thought of having a man's penis in their mouth.

      Some humans do have what's called a short palate, which means that structurally they really do have a difficult time placing objects deep into their mouth.

      This may or may not be your problem; a doctor should be able to evaluate this for you. You can learn to become a skilled oral lover with your guy without having to perform such acts, by the way.

      Many men enjoy the sheer pleasure of being licked along the shaft or on the highly sensitive coronal ridge (the ridge around the head), of being teased gently with little bites around the head (be very gentle) and even light sucking on the head.

      Another hot spot where you may want to use your tongue is on the frenulum, the point where the head meets the shaft on the underside.

    6. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      douggy, you must learn to become one with your manhood. Truly great rewards await you at the palace of snafu.

      Eat plenty of beefy noodles and your manhood will grow big and strong. All the ladies will gaze upon it with mighty envy. You will be the man.

      In the sky, there is no room for the nonsense of crack whores. Your mission is to plug up any holes in these whores you may find with your sizable pecker. Remember to use the fun coffee filters to mop up any leaky stuff from the lovely holes.

      All is happy to be here in Slashdot for your learning of how to be a pimp daddy. Having the fun!

    7. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by FIGJAM · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can watch how pong how it should be played :P

      --
      Do your best, hope for the best, suspect the worst.
    8. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      you want play pong ? ok, let's go :

      |
      |
      | o

    9. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there's thousands of programmers here that will be happy to send you their "pong" game. :)

      Here's an idea for the next poll: First game created. Tic-Tac-Toe, Checkers, Tetris, Pac-man, Pong, etc.

    10. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by ldumais · · Score: 0

      Oh ! I can code pong for Xbox. lets try ;-)

      Would you prefer the old 2d or 3d? OpenGL or DirectX?

    11. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by diadem · · Score: 1

      Asci Pong!

      |
      o|
      |

      back at ya!

      --
      Liquid Gaming - Your daily dose of gaming news
    12. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ascii Pong!

      | o
      |
      |

      back at ya!

    13. Re:700Mhz Pong Machine by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      reminds me of a TI-82 program

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
  3. anyone else reminded of batman... by gergi · · Score: 4, Funny

    The movie with the Riddler? Where he creates these boxes that sit on your TV and take over your thoughts? Are we sure that was Jim Carrey and not Bill Gates in that costume? :)

    Microsoft: "What do you want to think today?"

    --
    Nosce te Ipsum
    1. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not even slightly reminded of this.

    2. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by Guns+n'+Roses+Troll · · Score: -1

      I hope you die slowly; nigger cocks jackhammering your puckered asshole over and over and over until gallons of semen flow from your eyesockets.

    3. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait


      nut assmunching gates. balls suck bill assmunching. lick mom mom suck. nut lick pussy. cumlicker balls lick. assmunching assmunching suck stuff. suck dripping gates gates mouth. lick nut mouth bill. bill stuff lick. xbox balls mom. xbox bill xbox nut lick. fondle stuff, stuff mom cum.

      Yeah, that's right beeyatch.

    4. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by ChaveyChavez · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I can't believe how many response came from you MicroSlaves. You should learn to think for yourselves instead of mindlessly forking over $$$ to Uncle Bill's bank accounts and ego!

    5. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by ChaveyChavez · · Score: 1

      You're intelligent...aren't you!

    6. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a little late. That happened a decade ago, and the company was Nintendo, not Microsoft.

      The other evil Redmond company.

    7. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or coming to slashdot daily and subscribing to their version of anti-ms groupthink, yah i wish i could be that independent.

    8. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by DivineOb · · Score: -1

      What does this have to do with Guns n' Roses?

      --

      I must burn in hell, suffer and pay for my sins
      But Gods the one who's losing, Satan always wins!

    9. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by Egotistical+Rant · · Score: 2, Funny
      Are we sure that was Jim Carrey and not Bill Gates in that costume?

      How about Steve Ballmer and his Wet Armpit Stains?

    10. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by CmdrTaco+on · · Score: -1

      GnR are a bunch of fags and he's talking about nigger cock. Could the connection BE anymore clearer?

      --

      saru mo ki kara ochiru

    11. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

      You're boring, aren't you? :-)

      --
      Derek Greene
    12. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yes, paying $300 for a set-top computer that cost MS $400+ is just forking money into their bank accounts.

    13. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by DivineOb · · Score: -1

      Please violate my rectum

      --

      I must burn in hell, suffer and pay for my sins
      But Gods the one who's losing, Satan always wins!

    14. Re:anyone else reminded of batman... by CmdrTaco+on · · Score: -1

      My pleasure. I have the chainsaw, you show me your brown eye.

      --

      saru mo ki kara ochiru

  4. Hehe by natefanaro · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yea, I can't wait to see all the pissed off kids faces when their XBox crashed in the middle of a game. My Nintendo never had that problem!

    1. Re:Hehe by SilentChris · · Score: 4, Informative
      Um, and the XBox won't. The crashing thing is an urban myth supplemented with pre-launch stories of bad demo CD's crashing (which MS completely reissued).

      But if you like FUD, let it flow...

    2. Re:Hehe by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, for the N64 at least, Goldeneye had crash bugs. Turok (both, I think) had crash bugs. Zelda:OOT had crash bugs.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Hehe by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      And on top of that, software faults are generally in direct proportion to the complexity of the software (barring some revolutionary software development technologies). I would not be surprized if there were some little faults hidden in the XBox just because it's that complex of a device, and it isn't of much merit for people to run in and claim that their Pong machine never crashed.

    4. Re:Hehe by jdgreen7 · · Score: 1

      I never had my Nintendo crash during a game, but remember having to blow into the cartridges (because kids don't worry about getting real cleaners)? It used to take 6 or 7 tries before Super Mario Bros. would load up. But, I kept playing anyway.

      Crashes during games would probably upset more people than crashes before games, I suppose. We'll see how it pans out.

    5. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a page fault in Gauntelet Legends for N64 once.

    6. Re:Hehe by Maul · · Score: 2

      My copy of Zelda: OOT has never caused my N64 to crash. I wonder if you could be a bit more specific. I'd like to see this crash bug for myself.

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    7. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      links? At least the people with the urban legends had links to pictures of the crashed X-boxes. Your mindless defense of MS only shows that you are a drone of the borg. Try living up to your nick more often, especially the "Silent" part.

    8. Re:Hehe by Xaxor · · Score: 1

      Ok then...if crashes exist....what about Ctrl Alt Del? You mean....you haven't found them yet?! They ARE there...

      --
      When eveything is outlawed, outlaws will have everything. - Xaxor -
    9. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's either very, very funny or very, very lame. I can't decide which.

    10. Re:Hehe by jkovach · · Score: 1

      The only times I can remember Nintendo NES's crashing was when they fell on the floor after people tripped over your controller cord or after you got excited and yanked on the controller, pulling the NES off it's shelf. This was quite annoying because it usually happened when you were very far along in the game, but all you had to do was to reset the system, possibly eject and reinsert the cartridge, and start over. An Xbox, with it's DVD/whatever drive and internal hard drive, would probably be much worse off after an encounter with the floor... But from what I've heard it's so heavy that your controller would probably get unplugged before the system took a dive.

    11. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the fucking screenshot linked to in the story, dumbass. The XDK is the development kit, it's not an Xbox. Oh yeah, and go learn the difference between an error message and a crash.

    12. Re:Hehe by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      Well, as per usual, a quick google search turns up the answer. Quoteh the browser:
      It happend in my first fight with ghoma at the very beginning of the game, inside the deku tree. The fight was already going one for some rounds, as ghoma suddenly disappeared completely after beeing hit once more and returning to the ceiling. He did not reappear and i could walk around and look at that cave from all positions, waiting and serching for him. This kept going on as long as i tryed to shoot with my sling under the ceiling hoping to get ghoma out of his hide. At that moment, the game crased completely so i could only press the reset button. I tryed to defeat him again afterwards and everything worked well. I have no idea what i could have done to cause this crash. Since that strange crash my copy of the game runs absolute stable, so i think it's a real bug and not a problem with my copy.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    13. Re:Hehe by Lifewolf · · Score: 1
      Yea, I can't wait to see all the pissed off kids faces when their XBox crashed in the middle of a game. My Nintendo never had that problem!

      Two thoughts:

      1. You're not playing long enough. *grin*
      2. Nintendo never had a system with a heat generating motor in it before.

      Of the following systems I own, guess which have a tendancy to overheat and lock up:

      • Atari 2600
      • Nindendo Entertainment System
      • Nintendo Gameboy
      • Nintendo SNES
      • Sega Genesis
      • Sega CD
      • Sega 32x
      • Sega Saturn
      • Sony Playstation
      • Nintendo N64
      • Sega Dreamcast
      • Nintendo Gameboy Color
      • Bandai WonderSwan
      • Sony PS2
      • Nintendo Gameboy Advance
      Yep. The Sega CD, the Playstation, and especially the Saturn. All the optical drive systems, with the exception of the very recent ones: the Dreamcast and the PS2.

      Hopefully, Nintendo has picked up on the design lessons it took Sony and Sega one or two tries to learn. Having hot running chips in a console is only a small problem. While given a long enough play time cartridge-based systems can overheat and lock, it's fairly rare, and most non-game-all-day-straight players won't experience it. However, moving to optical disks, and adding a warm electric motor can lead to lockups real quick if you don't design carefully. Witness Sega's first two tries.

      I'm rooting for, and planning to buy, the GameCube, not the XBox, but we're seeing each company's first attempt to pack hot chips and a hot motor in a small package. Without even getting into possible firmware and software issues, I'm not counting out lockups with either device.

      --
      "Be Happy or Die." -- AoN
    14. Re:Hehe by GroundskeeperWilly · · Score: 1

      In fact the controller cord is DESIGNED to unplug before the system plunges to the floor. (It has some sort of special clip or something...)

    15. Re:Hehe by fossa · · Score: 1

      Putting the game genie in and pushing it in hard (not necessarily entering any codes) *always* made trouble games work for me. I never understood why the game genie worked without being pressed down like regular games, but shoving a game in w/o the game genie never worked...

    16. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have no fucking clue on what the hell you are talking about.

    17. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You own that many game systems ?

      Jesus christ, when you do you find to crap?

    18. Re:Hehe by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      Then it is remarkable that he managed to be completely correct, isn't it?
      - An XBox developer

    19. Re:Hehe by hime · · Score: 1

      My friends crashed a demo of San Francisco Rush 2049 for Dreamcast once. It complained it didn't have enough streak polys and said to call Steve. We took pictures, but I lost them when my computer got stolen. Alas.

  5. No GTA3...... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If the Xbox does not have GTA3 then it is not worth the money.....besides, we all know that it takes MS 3 times to get it right....to bad that in the console market a 3rd time can take you 10 years to get to....by then the Xbox will have been stomped on by PS5

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:No GTA3...... by Hegemony+Cricket · · Score: 2, Informative

      GTA3 is coming to XBox according to Rockstar games :-)

      --
      "I ain't got no flyin' shoes."
    2. Re:No GTA3...... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      damn
      ....well atleast my other point can stand :-)

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:No GTA3...... by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      Ida know. The "three time rule" can be augmented by their incredibly high budget on this one.

      I know the graphics sure are purty.

    4. Re:No GTA3...... by 2Flower · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty unimpressive blanket statement.

      The lack of ONE GAME will destroy the system? No. GTA3 is a good game, yes, but that doesn't mean all other games pale in comparison and X-Box's fare will never be able to cut the mustard.

      And the 'Microsoft needs three tries' thing is just silly. Sometimes it's taken them four or five tries. :) But seriously, that's not a particularly strong arguement to make.

      If you're going for low comedy with this declaration, good, but otherwise it's not enough to convince me X-box is fated for the scrap heap.

    5. Re:No GTA3...... by domc · · Score: 1

      What, and you don't think that Windows has an incredibly high budget? I would even guess that it is higher that Xbox's -- it is the core of their business after all.

      domc

    6. Re:No GTA3...... by bribecka · · Score: 2

      besides, we all know that it takes MS 3 times to get it right.

      Come on, that's not fair and you know it. It took 5 versions of DOS to finally get the damn thing to use high memory.

      --

      Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?

    7. Re:No GTA3...... by big_cat79 · · Score: 1

      According to the X-box coverage on CNet's News.com Gran Turismo 3 is a Sony developed game. I don't see them releasing that game for one of their competitor's machines.

      --

      BigCat79

      "The dead have risen and are voting Republican!" --Bart Simpson
    8. Re:No GTA3...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Grand Theft Auto 3. Where is the "A" in Grand Turismo 3?

    9. Re:No GTA3...... by alexmogil · · Score: 1
      First off, it's GRAN not Grand.

      Second, the title is Gran Turismo A-Spec 3. GTA3.

      Third, I've probably been trolled.

      --
      A winner is you!
    10. Re:No GTA3...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, That's Gran Turismo 3 A-Spec, AKA GT3 from SCEI. He was asking aboout GTA3, aka Grand Theft Auto 3 from Rockstar Games.

    11. Re:No GTA3...... by Moonshadow · · Score: 1

      ...and here I am thinking that we're all talking about Grand Theft Auto 3...

    12. Re:No GTA3...... by mesach · · Score: 1

      Actually if memory serves me right 10 years from now we should have the ps9??? wasnt it 2010 in the commercial?

      --
      moo.
    13. Re:No GTA3...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to shit on your parade, but GTA has ALWAYS sucked. It's fun for about 10 minutes and then the novelty of running people over and driving like an idiot wear off.

    14. Re:No GTA3...... by n2dasun · · Score: 1

      Doesn't GTA stand for "Grand Theft Auto", and not "Grand Turismo"?

      --
      I'm determined to reclaim my karma. Now, if I can only find a groundbreaking article and something witty to say....
  6. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    First post also released already !!

  7. I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Drizzten · · Score: 4, Informative

    I own a PS2 and am quite happy with it. However, I plan on keeping an open mind about the Xbox and the GameCube. Anyone else remember the damning the SNES got when it first came out? And how popular did it get?

    --

    "All mankind is at the mercy of a handful of neurotics". - Norman Douglas
    1. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't. My associates and I thought that it was pretty sweet.

      Grantd, I was about 12, and it had Super Metroid.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    2. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I damned the SNES purely on gaming performance. There were far superior machines at the time, but to many people could not resist the mindless, cartoon games that nintendo is famous for. I still have my trusty 3DO, and wish I still had my Jaguar. I never got to own a Neo Geo :-(

    3. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by snoozer20001 · · Score: 1

      I loved the SNES when it came out... If I remember right, I had it hooked up right next to my commodore 64! The SNES looked very good next to the old C64.

      --
      This space available at a low monthly rate...
    4. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it seems to me you take a liking to what are widely considered the most failed machines of all time. is this a theme in your life?

    5. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Super metroid didn't come out for a LONG time after the SNES. I doubt you used Super Metroid as a gauge on the SNES at launch time...

    6. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by CmdrTaco+on · · Score: -1

      He has an Amiga. nuf said.

      --

      saru mo ki kara ochiru

    7. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Zaknafein500 · · Score: 2

      I feel that the SNES was the peak of console gaming. The visuals and audio were such a huge step ahead of everything out there (Genesis included) it blew me away. And the games were revolutionary. To this day I love to play games like Super Metroid, A Link to the Past, and Donkey Kong Country. After the SNES, it has all gone downhill IMO.

      --

      "The guide is definitive, reality is frequently inaccurate."
    8. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by rhost89 · · Score: 1

      God you guys are making me feel old, i remember when i thought the 2600 was the height of gaming. You know you can only play so much pong.... ;9

      --
      I will bend your mind with my spoon
    9. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      I had an SNES before they were even available in Canada (we drove to the states to get one, because Nintendo thought that they coulnd not bother importing them for xmas in Canada that year. Of course, 3 days after I did that, they were available here...)

      Launch titles that I recall were Final Fantasy II (aka. V), F-Zero, Pilotwings, Super Mario World (remember when consoles included games...? ;).

      F-Zero was fucking cool. I played that into the ground, and just recently picked it up for my GBA. Awesome game.

      Super Mario World was mario. Fun.

      FFII kicked ass completley. Loved that game.

      Pilotwings I played once, seemed kind of boring.

      It was a pretty solid launch, especially by today's standards. It had at least 2 titles which were must haves, and a kick ass included game.

    10. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by karnal · · Score: 1

      I actually agree with this comment. While I just went out and bought a PS2 over the weekend, the only real games I'll play on it is GT3-A and Gradius 3/4... and in all honesty, Gradius Gaiden for the PS1 rocked more than the release of 3/4...

      I don't forsee myself getting as immersed into other games for any console, unless they have the playability and rememberability of some of the SNES titles. I love seeing whizz-bang graphics for the first 15 minutes or so, but after that, it's all about playability...

      --
      Karnal
    11. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I have an Atari 600XL PC.

      Anybody want to help me port Linux to it?

    12. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I remember plugging quarters into that 'Space War' whatever game in the arcades. That must have been about 1977.

      Some of you folks' daddy wasn't even into puberty then.

    13. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Cutriss · · Score: 2

      Not that it matters, but Final Fantasy II was released as IV in Japan, not V. North America didn't see FFV until Final Fantasy Anthology was released a few years ago.

      And for the record, it wasn't an American launch title. If I remember correctly, the 1st party launch lineup was Super Mario World, Pilotwings, F-Zero, Play Action Football (Or somesuch, I don't recall), and something else that slips my mind... Pilotwings was actually pretty cool, outside of the damned Helicopter invasion missions. I played Pilotwings 64 some - It was pretty snazzy, and while everyone was saluting Mario 64's visual imagery, everyone ignored Pilotwings 64, which was every damned bit as good. Two words...Rocket Pack. :D

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    14. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Guignol · · Score: 1

      It's incredible how you self-declared old wise people complain about how much it was better before.
      What's wrong with you ?
      I don't know.. people weren't like that when i was younger... :)

    15. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when consoles came with games. My NES came with Super Mario 3, my SNES came with Super Mario World, my gameboy came bundled with Super Mario Land (I'm about 30% on the games name) and my PlayStation came bundled with a second controller, Crash Bandicoot 2 and a PlayStation UnderGround demo disc. If I would've taken an hour drive over to Futureshop instead of the local Canadian Tire to buy my PS2, I could've gotten the console with GT3: A-Spec

    16. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by diadem · · Score: 1

      This is one of the most intelegent posts I heard. Way too many people are speculating from hype and sterotypes. Its either "microsoft sucks" or "the x-box r0xx3rs your b0>have nothign solid to base it on. Until they do, I'm going to hold off on buying systems too.

      --
      Liquid Gaming - Your daily dose of gaming news
    17. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      Pilotwings 64 was a blast, and beautiful. even on the SNES it was a good way of showing off the graphics capabilities of the new system. I hope they make one for gamecube.

    18. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      couldn't have said it better myself. SNES was the PEAK of console gaming. Enough power to make interesting ideas, but not so much that you could sacrifice gameplay for graphics.

    19. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      I don't know if it [ FFII ] was an American launch title or not, but I owned it before I had my SNES.

      I didn't actually get to fucking *play* it until Christmas that year (after acquiring it in November -- thanks mom, talk about torture), but I am pretty sure I had FFII at launch time.

    20. Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... by Mandrias · · Score: 1

      Ugh.. do you still think 2600 was the peak of console gaming?

      May my 2600 rott in peace. (pieces?) hehe

      --
      Use the Z-modem protocol between Information Superhighway routers to compress the plaintext. ~LordOfYourPants
  8. another news article by osiris · · Score: 5, Informative

    the register is also carrying a story about this. it talks about the uk release date as well as containing links to sites with more info on where to buy it and where you can test them out.

  9. For a different perspective... by mblase · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...take a look at C|Net's review of Microsoft's strategies with the Xbox. Bottom line of their article is that Microsoft has had to put on a completely different face to court developers for their game console, switching from monopolistic tyrant to play-nice we-want-to-help-you-succeed hardware investor. According to the quotes cited, it's worked, too. So far.

    1. Re:For a different perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      did it ever occur to you that they would want their developers to succeed? successful developers make good games, which sells systems. not to mention that gamers get to play fun stuff, so everyone wins. is this some sort of evil plot, or just smart economics?

    2. Re:For a different perspective... by RottenDeadite · · Score: 1

      From what I've gleaned from developer's interviews, the major advantage to the XBox has nothing to do with Microsoft's business practices.

      Mainly, it's the similarities to programming for a PC. There's little retraining needed, and development time is cut way down due to the pre-configured nature of a gaming platform.

      --

      ***JUMP PAD ACTIVATION INITIATION START***
      ***TRANSPORT WHEN READY***

    3. Re:For a different perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole "play-nice we-want-to-help-you-succeed" game is not a new one for Microsoft by any means. How do you think they got to *be* a monopolistic tyrant in the first place? As hard as it is to imagine now, there was a time when the fate of Windows teetered in the balance. Although a lot of factors went into the eventual dominance of Windows on the desktop, one of the major factors had to be that Microsoft bent over backwards to help application developers.

    4. Re:For a different perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical for slashdot to pick possibly the worst review of XBox on the net to cover it's release....

      Appalling - Thats the word I use for this review and Slashdot...

      This review is nothing more than an unbridled venting of bile and hatred towards Microsoft... it sickens me to see such blind hatred... You had to read half a page to get past the most spiteful unrelated tripe to get to something even remotely relevant to Xbox....

      You guys are need counselling quick.... being this full of shit cant be good for anyone...

    5. Re:For a different perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If those developers are buying Microsoft's act, they deserve to get screwed again.

  10. When to buy by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'll buy an X-Box when you pry cash into my cold, dead hands.

    1. Re:When to buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read that ms will be loosing money on the sale of the xbox hardware, so i was thinking of buying one (and taking some of bills money) and turning into a linux machine of some sort.

    2. Re:When to buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep.

      You can slap a 'Tux the pengiun' sticker on the front.

      Then you have a Linux machine. Be sure to never connect power to it, though, or you'll be disillusioned.

  11. XBOX advertisement blitz by Green+Light · · Score: 1

    Last night, here in Columbus, they started advertising the games pretty heavily. I saw ads for "Halo", among others.
    I don't know if it was just because of my cheap tube, but the images shown were a bit "grainy". Not exactly what I was expecting from a 21st-century gaming console.

    --
    "Send an Instant Karma to me" - Yes
    1. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      they use anti-azailing(sp?) in the games......baaaaad idea.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by IRNI · · Score: 2

      Yeah I was watching tv last night and saw about 20 commercials for halo and odd world. But you know what seems funny to me? Am I the only one that notices that the commercials show the CG and not so much the gameplay? Isn't this the ultimate form of false advertising? People are going to think that the gameplay looks that good. I played an XBOX in virgin superstore in New Orleans this weekend. The game on it (some football game) looked like nothing special. Like sega dreamcast even. And the controller looks like someone went nuts with a beadazzeler on a hunk of plastic. Rhinestone buttons. How ghey.

    3. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by bonk · · Score: 1

      Eh, remember the commercials for diablo2? All they showed were the cutscenes.

      By the way, I saw a commercial for halo, it looked like they were showing in-game sequences, not cutscenes.

      --
      I hope to die peacefully in my sleep like grandpa, not screaming like his passengers.
    4. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by SilentChris · · Score: 5, Informative
      All of Halo's graphics are done in-engine. As are Project Gotham: Racing. And Dead or Alive 3. Only Munch's Oddysee showed pre-rendered CG in the commercial.

      Kindly get your facts straight.

    5. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortuneately that crap has been standard practise in the games industry since FF VII. Do you recall seeing any in game footage or blue menues in those ads? I agree it's false advertising, though.

    6. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by rosewood · · Score: 1

      What?
      FSAA is not a baaaaad idea you *()%

      Look at the JAGGIES JAGGIES JAGGIES the PS2 has

      Look how much better any game on the PC looks w/ FSAA and w/o FSAA

    7. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      Eh, remember the commercials for diablo2? All they showed were the cutscenes.

      yeah but they were working from a sequal that had a huge hit in the original....they basicly said...people won't worry if the graphics are the best since they know they will be at least as good as the original. so lets just show cut sceens.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    8. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      they look fuzzy to me....but then I like a sharper image...so it is just my opinion...also, it is badly done FSAA.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    9. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My predictions (I'm often good at this):

      We're extremely likely to see a MS advertising blitz here on Slashdot as well. It will appear as a huge string of pro-xbox postings. Microsoft seems to control a large number of slashdot user accounts for its agents to post from.

      Both Slashdot and the Register will get emergency attention from microsoft marketing workers (to paraphrase ms marketeer brian (valentine) ) "Smother the sites from every angle."

    10. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by Red+Avenger · · Score: 1

      So I take it you belong to the Sun/Apple/Sony agent pool?

    11. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by SloppyElvis · · Score: 1

      that must be why they look so unspectacular.

    12. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the jaggies...
      i used to play my genesis on a moitor rather than a tv, so i could see the pixels. it looked sharper.

    13. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you haven't seen any good screenshots. The graphics in Halo are EASILY as good as the publicity shots, and I'm talking in-game. The Geforce 3, upon which the Xbox's vid processor is based on, can do realtime pixel-by-pixel lighting, so nothing is pre-rendered; it's all done on the fly, at incredible resolutions, and really damn purty. Yer still limited by the resolution on a TV, though; wait until Halo comes out on PC (it better, Xbox code is so similar to PC, they'd be stupid not to port it). Then look at it in 1600x1200 resolution, and see how good the graphics are then.

    14. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      Hey, now. The Sega Dreamcast is still technically no pushover, even if it is a few years old. It's an awesome machine.

      In regards to FMV. Isn't that what Sony has been pushing upon brainless zealots for years now? Can we say Final Fantasy?

    15. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe all you anti-Microsoft shills, are bracing yourself for those meanies to come in and shill for Microsoft.

      Face it. You represent the expensive piss-and-moan 1% of the X Box market. They'd rather you just buy a new set of dice for your AD&D and stayed away from X box.

    16. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ......baaaaad idea.

      Dunno. Sounds like the bleeting of a sheep, to me.

    17. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      The FSAA works quickly because it's only at TV resolution.

      It looks really fuzzy compared to GF3 FSAA at 1024x768+ because it's only at TV resolution.

      I agree, it was a baaaad idea. :)

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    18. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by MrYotsuya · · Score: 1

      I've seen a lot of PlayStation commericals that display the CGI only. MS isn't the only one to do that.

    19. Re:XBOX advertisement blitz by owenc · · Score: 1

      What's even worse is that they use english in the games....

  12. Hoopla indeed. by Nijika · · Score: 1
    Microsoft is acting like a) their entire future is riding on this thing and b) it's the greatest thing since the condom.

    People are going to find out pretty fast that it's a PC in dressup. Gimme a PS2 and some evil GTA3 action any day. I'll just go ahead and get a better video card for my existing PC...

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:Hoopla indeed. by Hegemony+Cricket · · Score: 1

      GTA3 is coming out on the XBox according to Rockstar Games.

      --
      "I ain't got no flyin' shoes."
    2. Re:Hoopla indeed. by reachinmark · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Microsoft is acting like a) their entire future is riding on this thing

      But it is essentially.. at least, according to Cringley, it's the expansion into new areas like gaming consoles that Microsoft desperately needs in order to keep growing at the necessary rate to avoid going bankrupt.

      Look at it from a positive consumer viewpoint -- as previous slashdoters have mentioned, Microsoft are essentially selling a half-decent PC at below cost. Get yerself an X-Box, get Linux running on it, and have a good laugh at them.

    3. Re:Hoopla indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft isnt going bankrupt jackass. They have about 15 billion in cash sitting in the bank. All of there investments and they are still making money selling windows and office. Microsoft just wants to grow MORE.

    4. Re:Hoopla indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The problem is that alot of that money is on paper.

      If thier stock price starts to go down, that paper suddenly becomes alot less valuable.

      They need to keep growning to keep speculation regarding the growth of thier stock price up, so they don't pop.

    5. Re:Hoopla indeed. by Eccles · · Score: 2

      Re: running Linux:

      Is anyone actually working on XBox linux? I couldn't find any real projects for it.

      Is there any evidence of (or cunning way to use) USB peripherals for the XBox? I suppose you might manage something working through the ethernet connector, but additional hardware starts eating away at the cheapness of it as a PC.

      As long as I'm asking, is anyone playing with using a Gameboy Advance as a fancy PC peripheral? Using it for games like football where one wants to secretly set plays seems like a nifty idea.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    6. Re:Hoopla indeed. by decoydog · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is acting like a) their entire future is riding on this thing

      Isn't that what separates Microsoft and its success from other companies? The attitude that a less than 100% push will cause the downfall of the company even when reality says otherwise.

    7. Re:Hoopla indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup i agree.... You will soon notice its just regural x86 hardware! Jerky movements"variable fps" x86 hardware cant even scroll 2d txt across the screen without looking JERKY.

      Which even my old a500 can handle much better than todays pcs.

    8. Re:Hoopla indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, it isn't, dipshit. It's 36 million dollars. Cash. English, motherfucker. Do you speak it?

    9. Re:Hoopla indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Cirngeley is full of shit.

      He has always been full of shit.

      What a gas bag. And that graphic on his site. His face between Gates and Jobs.

      Geesh. What a has-been 80's idiot.

    10. Re:Hoopla indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they can pry my Twin-Turbo, 1800HP Escudo -Pikes Peak edition from my cold, dead (cramped) fingers.

      Seriously though for the first 3 weeks of playing that game, my fingers and shoulder hurt from keeping constant pressure on the accellerator button, so that the analog input wouldn't kick in and slow me down.

    11. Re:Hoopla indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never used a condom, have you? Otherwise you would have used something else to describe it, like sliced bread or the wheel.

    12. Re:Hoopla indeed. by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      "As long as I'm asking, is anyone playing with using a Gameboy Advance as a fancy PC peripheral? Using it for games like football where one wants to secretly set plays seems like a nifty idea."

      Here is the real reason for the dotcom crash...

      Everyone was so busy 'secretly' playing games at work.

      Having said that, anyone up for some QA3?

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    13. Re:Hoopla indeed. by newbiescum · · Score: 1

      Estimates are more like in the 40 billion dollar range if you include stocks and whatnot that the company holds.

    14. Re:Hoopla indeed. by cgadd · · Score: 1

      > is there any evidence of (or cunning way to use)
      > USB peripherals for the XBox?

      I've got a USB network interface running on my PS2. Only Tony Hawk Pro Skater 3 can use it, but I was suprised that I didn't have to do anything special. Just plug in the USB connector, plug in the ethernet cable, and turn on the PS2. I could see the DHCP request come from the PS2, and it was set.

  13. Thank you for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..saying nothing useful.
    But it's an early post, always worth a shot !

  14. HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! by until(0) · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Now Gate's will finally understand failure!!!!

    --
    -da5id
    1. Re:HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! by Brento · · Score: 2, Troll

      Now Gate's will finally understand failure!!!!

      Oh, that's not fair. He understands it, alright. I've got one word for you: "Bob".

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    2. Re:HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      that was more an Idea from gates wife that from him. so realy, he has never had an idea that failed.....mmostly because he would push it and keep pushing it by way of brute force until enough people got the idea and wanted it.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! by CrazyJoel · · Score: 1

      Now Gate's will finally understand failure!!!!

      >Oh, that's not fair. He understands it, alright. >I've got one word for you: "Bob".

      Or wince.

      --

      Such is the infinite Grace of Popeye.
    4. Re:HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! by dhamsaic · · Score: 2

      could you imagine having been one of the people that worked on that? what would you tell your friends? did they realize they were working on the hokiest program ever? how could you tell someone with a straight face "yeah, i work on microsoft BOB"? that's definitely something you leave out of your resume :)

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    5. Re:HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! by Harlockjds · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i believe the founders of valve (half-life) were on the BOB team

    6. Re:HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! by morbid · · Score: 0

      Didn't it ultimately become the Office Assistant in Turd^H^H^H^HWord etc.?

      --
      I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
    7. Re:HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a while... Rover (one of the Bob characters) is now the default assistant to help you search in Windows XP. While the Bob program may have been a colossal failure, bits of it keep showing up in strange places...

    8. Re:HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about?

  15. jeeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    "So, for all you poor souls who lined up to give money to the borg: does it work? Any blue-screens yet?"

    fuck you alright, if you dont like it, get to work on the linbox game console or STFU. oh yea, thats right, linux SUCKS for anything but running apache

  16. BSOD by suffering.bot · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Xbox has a green interface, thus has a green screen of death.

    --

    chad

    ERROR 404: sig not found
    1. Re:BSOD by staili · · Score: 2, Funny

      Xbox has a green interface, thus has a green screen of death.

      How can you do Ctrl-Alt-Del with a Xbox's controller? :)

    2. Re:BSOD by Cardhore · · Score: 2

      it's called themable crash screens. they got the idea from Mandrake's themable linux installer.

    3. Re:BSOD by Xaxor · · Score: 1

      They're on the back molded into the controller itself so you have to look for them. And even when you find them, you must buy an upgrade to use them. :)

      --
      When eveything is outlawed, outlaws will have everything. - Xaxor -
    4. Re:BSOD by gorillasoft · · Score: 1

      Has anybody else noticed that the "Green Screen of Death" has a caption with XDK at the top? As in, Xbox Development Kit? Okay, so maybe the XDK crashed, but we don't know whether that was an MS error or one caused by a programer's error while somebody was using the XDK for development. This does not show that the Xbox itself crashed; it merely shows that the XDK development environment can crash. Are there any crash-proof development environments out there for any platforms? Doubtful.

      As to whether the Xbox is good or not, that remains to be seen, but let's stick to factual arguments and not spread the FUD that Slashdot is so quick to point out when it relates to Linux.

    5. Re:BSOD by talonyx · · Score: 1

      I agree. I think that's on a development box, probably a few months ago, caused by bad code of course - obviously fixed before release.

      You people must realize - consoles DO NOT crash. They don't release games or hardware that crash!

      Can't believe the FUD...

    6. Re:BSOD by twoflower · · Score: 1
      I agree. I think that's on a development box, probably a few months ago, caused by bad code of course - obviously fixed before release. You people must realize - consoles DO NOT crash. They don't release games or hardware that crash!
      You're incorrect. There are lots of documented cases of the demo (kiosk) X-Boxes the stores have had for a weeks crashing left and right. Some store in SF had one that wouldn't last more than a few minutes between crashes.

      Twoflower
      --


      --
      Twoflower
    7. Re:BSOD by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      That's true. Also keep in mind the first generation of PS1's had heat problems from the internal transformer. Some would get hot and lock..and the first generation of PS2's (which I was unfortunate enough to purchase) also had heat and DVD issues. Nothing's perfect.

    8. Re:BSOD by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      That is completely false. Game consoles DO crash. You just don't realize it beacue it doesn't usually give you a verbose error. Fortunately, most games go through QA testing. Sometimes, they get hung up on crash bugs that they can't easily reproduce. This slows down publication of the game severely.

    9. Re:BSOD by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      Only 5 things in this world can be perfect:

      A)Heineken
      B)Sega Dreamcast
      C)Linux/Unix/BSD
      D)pr0n
      E)AMD

      That isn't in any particular order, either. Pizza comes close, but isn't always perfect.

    10. Re:BSOD by Hertog · · Score: 1

      You are obviously mislead by your choice in beer.

      Not Heineken if perfect, Grolsch is! (That is the 'other' beer from the Netherlands)

      Gr.

      Hertog

      --
      -=- I heard rumours about an OS called "Social Life", heard of it? Is it stable? -=-
    11. Re:BSOD by rela · · Score: 1
      You people must realize - consoles DO NOT crash. They don't release games or hardware that crash!

      I hope you meant that as a joke/troll... I've crashed console games before, just by giving them bizarre input. (IE no patchers or odd hardware). Being a console or a console game doesn't make something immune to bugs. Come on now. =)

    12. Re:BSOD by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1
      "You people must realize - consoles DO NOT crash. They don't release games or hardware that crash!"

      I can't tell if you're trolling, or simply haven't played many video games. Let me assure you that console systems do crash, there is no guarantee that code is perfect. Obviously there is more effort to reduce bugs in a fixed enviroment, but it is impossible to have perfect code all of the time.

      Fuzzy
    13. Re:BSOD by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase, the problem with pr0n is that it isn't perfect. But it certainly helps.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    14. Re:BSOD by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      I got my ps2 the day it came out, not any problems with heat and dvd playback.

      My brother got one about a month later, it wont even read any disks anymore, and sony wants him to pay 120 bucks to fix it..

      Gotta love it!

    15. Re:BSOD by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      They are both damn good beers =)

      Only if Heineken had a cool top like Grolsh does then it might be better..

      And btw, I have a Heineken bottle that has a stamp on it that says "For military use only". My grandfather got it when he was in the Korean War.. I think my little brother recently opened it and drank it though, probably pretty nasty

  17. Salon review written by a jaded man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    who obviously never got a free XBox from Bill, but did get his dick sucked by Sony.

  18. A PS2 with different games by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 4, Troll

    I have it. I've played it. The bottom line at the moment is: *shrug*. It's extremely difficult to see how this is any different than a PlayStation 2. If you're expecting something miles beyond the PS2, then you'll be disappointed. From my point of view it's a PS2 with different games.

    Halo is Yet Another First Person Shooter. I was expecting something revolutionary. Don't get me wrong, it's fun just like Half-Life and friends are fun, but it's simply other game of that style. It isn't a great leap forward. Arguably it isn't any leap forward.

    1. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If it's a PS2 with different games already, consider what it'll be like once developers get up to speed. Think about when the PS2 first came out -- many people said it was simply a Dreamcast with different games; only now are the differences in power and capabilities beginning to show...

    2. Re:A PS2 with different games by rogue420007 · · Score: 1

      finally, someone who's not a 15 yr old MS flamer. thx for the info Going to pick mine up asap.

    3. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Now it's apparent that the Dreamcast was a far better piece of kit.

    4. Re:A PS2 with different games by djrogers · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is a _major_ difference - the PS2 won't/can't do any resolutions above the NTSC standard 480i. That looks like crap on anything bigger than a 32" tube TV, and pales in comparison to the HD quality games that you can play on a PC. XBOX games are 480p (non-interlaced) at least, and the developers have the option of making them 16:9 - not by letterboxing, but by having more horizontal resolution. This is the #1 reason I've been waiting for the XBOX, as NTSC stuff just looks poor on my 120" FPTV.

      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    5. Re:A PS2 with different games by instinctdesign · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This quote from the Salon article said it best (and I couldn't agree more):
      "Have one look at the tanker scene in MGS2," says Keighley, "with the rain falling, the puddles splashing and the wind gushing, all at 60 frames per second. That scene by itself is more cinematic and more realistic than anything I've seen on the other consoles ... Microsoft keeps telling us that Xbox is more powerful than the PS2," says Keighley, "but at least at this point MGS2 is just as impressive looking as anything I've seen on the Xbox. It just goes to show that graphic horsepower and processing speed isn't always what matters -- creativity and artistry can go a long way to making a console successful."
      --
      forma3
    6. Re:A PS2 with different games by keithlarsen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no 'getting up to speed'. It is all Direct X , Direct 3D and other standard Microsoft technologies. That was supposed to be the beauty of the XBox, no learning curve like with the PS2.

    7. Re:A PS2 with different games by Red+Avenger · · Score: 1

      I totally disagree with you. I sincerely doubt you have actually played Halo let alone own an Xbox. If you had you wouldn't say such things. Please be good enough to tell us the multiplayer modes available in Halo. And could you also tell me what happens when you first start playing the game?

      If I am wrong I appologize but I think that you aren't being entirely truthfull in your comment.

      Halo is flat out the best game I have ever played on any platform. Revolutionary? You betcha.

      Check out gamespots review of the game. They gave it a 9.7 and I think that if you actually played it your tune would change.

    8. Re:A PS2 with different games by alman · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how true this is.
      My friend has a PS2 on a 64" HDTV, looks amazing!

    9. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your talking about picture quality on a FPTV? LOL. A troll, or just stupid? You can drive that thing with anything you want, and it will still look like crap.

    10. Re:A PS2 with different games by drzhivago · · Score: 1

      Thats very true and all, for now. Comparing a system's generation 2 games with a more powerful system's generation 1 games is very easy to do. Most likely they will be on par. Look at the batch of Dreamcast games released around the time the PS2 was out. The PS2 was outclassed!

      The same is happenening here. Keighley is comparing generation 2 PS2 games with generation 1 XBox games. Not surprisingly the PS2 games are at least on par with the XBox games. And right now, thats the reason I'm not getting an XBox or a Gamecube. The PS2 is finally hitting its stride, and at (for Sony) a most opportune time. MGS2, GTA3, Devil May Cry, etc. all great games

      Come back in a year, and lets revisit this comparison.

      Greg

    11. Re:A PS2 with different games by ansible · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some of the higher quality TVs now will de-interlace incoming NTSC signals, and smooth out the picture by interpolating between the lines.

      The result is that the picture looks like it has a higher resolution than it actually posseses.

      So having NTSC input isn't as bad as it used to be.

    12. Re:A PS2 with different games by Refrag · · Score: 2

      Gran Turismo 3 and SSX Tricky look awesome on my 38" direct-view widescreen HDTV with built in line-doubler. Although, I wish it would output 480p like the GameCube does -- it probably wouldn't help much though.

      "the developers have the option of making them 16:9 - not by letterboxing, but by having more horizontal resolution."

      PlayStation games that support 16:9 TVs, do so by creating an anamorphic game image. This is the same way that widescreen DVDs work. It preserves vertical resolution.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    13. Re:A PS2 with different games by Ian+Schmidt · · Score: 2

      Actually, in 16:9 the Xbox does NOT run a higher horizontal resolution - it's the same anamorphic-but-not-entirely you've seen since some of the later PS1 games.

    14. Re:A PS2 with different games by shogusumi · · Score: 1
      The problem with this idea, of course, is that we'll be comparing PS2 Gen 3/4 games, and XBox Gen 2 games, so you're still stuck.


      I'm still amazed at some of the stuff they were able to get the PS1 to do even as the PS2 was coming out. Some crazy code from some brilliant people.

      --
      -shogusumi
      $email =~ s/(mon|key)//g;
      Computer geeks are the ultimate recyclers... especially those of us on AC
    15. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you stop beating around the bush and just flat out say "Liar Liar pants on fire."?

    16. Re:A PS2 with different games by angelo · · Score: 1

      I thought I was watching a movie when I watched the intro to MGS2 a few months ago. It was completely amazing at what they put intot those scenes. The kicker is that the previous MGS used some other tricks like 4 frame animations interlaced to make PERFECT talking character portraits in comms mode. Tres Cool.

    17. Re:A PS2 with different games by interiot · · Score: 2

      *nudge nudge* Reviews of Halo are off the charts...

    18. Re:A PS2 with different games by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Let's review Microsoft history, shall we?

      Netscape 1 sucked on toast
      IE1 sucked on toast with cherries on top

      Netscape was usable
      IE2 sucked on toast

      Netscape 3 was great
      IE3 was usable

      Netscape 4 was big and bloated and didn't add anything useful
      IE4 was great

      Netscape 5... never happened
      IE5 refined IE4 a bit

      Netscape 6 sucked, from what I understand to be because it wasn't mature enough
      IE6 was yet another refinement

      Of course, Mozilla is another story...

      Netscape is now yesterday's news and Microsoft is the 800-pound gorilla in yet another area. Netscape lost this battle primarily because they couldn't code as well as Microsoft... and they even had a serious head start (but does anyone really remember what a complete piece of crap NS1 was?)

      When Microsoft decides to compete with someone they usually won't win in round 1 (at least if they play fair), but when you're a half-trillion dollar company, you can afford to both throw incredible amounts of resources at a problem and wait a few years for an industry-leading product to gel out of it. If the XBox is "as good" or "about the same" as a PS2 (better than being about the same as a PS/2, I think), then I would bet that the XBox-2 has a good chance to exceed the PS3.

      I think the XBox's potential lies in the ability (I would assume) to easily port Windows code over to it. I'm not a Linux programmer, but I am a Windows programmer so that appeals to me. Of course, the day someone ports Linux to the XBox, I will laugh as hard as anyone else.

      I'd love to see MAME ported to the XBox... that HD would hold all near-3000 ROMs. To me these days the consoles are more interesting now for the games that are distributed for them, but what they can be hacked to do.

      In the meantime, enjoy the games!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    19. Re:A PS2 with different games by interiot · · Score: 2
      I'd love to see MAME ported to the XBox...

      Already done

    20. Re:A PS2 with different games by gregRowe · · Score: 1

      480p is useless unless you have an HDTV capable TV set - the cheapest that I have seen is 900 US $.

      --
      There\'s no place like ~
    21. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. One of the first of the anti-Microsoft astroturfers speaks his piece.

      Does anybody care?

      Nope.

    22. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just an anti-MS astroturfer.

      Pay no attention to the little man behind the curtain.

    23. Re:A PS2 with different games by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      No, most people said that it was INFERIOR to the Dreamcast. Only now is it starting to come close to producing games that are as technically advanced. The X-Box is a whole different ballpark. The PS2 doesn't even come close. Fortunately for Sony, they have some good games on their side.

    24. Re:A PS2 with different games by 13Echo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heck. Newer games for the Dreamcast, like Shenmue 2 still outclass everything else available for consoles. Never have I seen so much detail go into a console game. It's astounding.

    25. Re:A PS2 with different games by jchenx · · Score: 1

      I think "A PS2 with different games" is a pretty darn good description of the X-Box, and even the GameCube for that matter. I think a lot of people are putting extra ideas into what the X-Box is simply because it's Microsoft behind the wheel, as if they expect MS to dominate the console world just as they have the desktop environment.

      The X-Box is just another gaming console. Yes, it's powerful, but so are the other systems. It's got unique features, such as it includes a hard drive, but other systems differentiate themselves as well. (The GameCube can link with the portable GameBoy Advance, etc.) The way I see it, the X-Box fills in the void that Sega left when they exited the hardware business.

      Not that any of this is *bad* for Microsoft though. I think MS will be happy as long as the X-Box contends. After all, this is their first foray into big time consumer electronics (correct me if I'm wrong ... and no, I don't count UltimateTV or the MS line of keyboards and mice). They have years to work on X-Box 2, 3, etc.

      Undoubtedly there are probably plans of using the X-Box to introduce other MS products into the living room. I'm also certain Sony has the same aspirations. We sure do spend a lot of money on our TVs, DVD players, stereos, speakers, gaming consoles, etc. But all of this is a few years away, and I'm not convince it's ever going to happen.

      Oh well, competition is good. Now that the GameCube and X-Box both of four controller ports, Sony will finally learn and put four ports on the PS3. *sigh*

      --
      -- jchenx
    26. Re:A PS2 with different games by dpotter · · Score: 1
      djrogers said:
      There is a _major_ difference - the PS2 won't/can't do any resolutions above the NTSC standard 480i. That looks like crap on anything bigger than a 32" tube TV

      Hmmm... this sounds like an oversimplification.
      If I'm not mistaken, SMPTE recommends that picture quality observations relying upon visual acuity be taken from a distance of 6-8 screen heights away from the television. So, in the case of 480i on a 32" screen, you should expect it to look pretty sharp at, say, 18 feet away.

      This is the principle that allows a Jumbotron to look great in a ballpark even with a relatively low-resolution signal.
    27. Re:A PS2 with different games by Andrewkov · · Score: 1, Troll
      NTSC stuff just looks poor on my 120" FPTV.

      Awww.. poor baby!! Video games look like crap on your 120" TV.. Well they look pretty bad on my 12" black and white TV also, so stop complaining!!

    28. Re:A PS2 with different games by gururise · · Score: 1
      As any videophile will tell you, using the internal scan doubler of a TV produces output of inferior quality vs. having an already progressive (line doubled) signal fed into the input of a TV.

      Most new RPTV's and HDTV sets can support a 480p input. If the XBox truely outputs a 480p signal, I would expect the quality to be superior to that of a Playstation 2 who's output is 480i which can then be converted to 480p by the TV set.

      Though you end up with 480p in both cases, its quite obvious the XBox solution is the optimal one.

      Gene Ruebsamen
      Orange County Real Estate

    29. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to the special Color/BW switch, I've found that Atari 2600 games look excellent on a 12" black and white TV

    30. Re:A PS2 with different games by atomray · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I remember Mosaic, and it was amazing. So was Netscape 1 - for the time, and considering what HTML at the time could do. My first webpage was, of course, lame by today's standards as was the browser, but at that time it was quite impressive. I don't think any IE before V3 even got close to Netscape.

      True enough that MS currently dominates, but I think that everyone can agree that that was due to illegal practices on Microsoft's part.

      As for Netscape 5, well, that's Mozilla - it exists. I use it everyday - Netscape 6 is Mozilla will 'buy now' links embedded (and an instant messenger built in).

      --
      take your sig and shove it
    31. Re:A PS2 with different games by revery · · Score: 1

      You people do remember that when the PS2 released, it had a terribly small set of games, none of which showed anywhere near the graphics capabilities that we are seeing in current titles.

      The main thing that we are dealing with here is second generation development versus first generation release titles. (Granted the hardware for the Xbox is basically a PC, but it may still be a change for console developers) I can give you an example from quite a while back that made the biggest impression on me. Near the end of the Super Nintendo's cycle (while the world was still waiting on the N64), and shortly after the release of the Playstation and it's skyrocket to fame, Rare studios released Donkey Kong Country for the N64. It was phenomenal compared to any SuperNes game, and fared better than many Playstation games. It made me question the superiority of the Playstation. Since then I have learned the tremendous gains that are made in each generation of game development. The capabilities of the system become more apparent, and the developers learn exactly how much they can squeeze out of the hardware.

      This is exactly what is being seen in the Xbox vs. PS2 comparisons. In fact, as I look back at reviews of early games released on both the Dreamcast and PS2, several mags gave them nearly identical praise. Over a year later, it is clear that PS2 is capable of more than the Dreamcast, and given a year of new development, the Xbox should show the same distinction.
      The real question is the same one that plagued the Dreamcast: will enough third party developers make games for it? The answer already seems to be yes.
      I don't mind criticism of the Xbox, but criticism that would not have been (and was not applied) to the PS2 is biased and pointless. We just need to give the system time to show it's power. If it fails in that respect, then it will fail completely. Personally, I think the competition will be good for everyone.

    32. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll hold out for a GameCube, it has a nice PPC processor which means it's games could be easily ported ot the Macintosh platform, and it has HDTV outputs on the stock unit. Besides, it isn't just a glorified PC like the (e)X-Box.

    33. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is the best friggin post i have read in a long time

    34. Re:A PS2 with different games by SomeoneYouDontKnow · · Score: 2

      Illegal practices may have had something to do with it, but Netscape 4.0, 4.01, and 4.02 blew chunks, and they happened to blow chunks at just about the same time that IE 4 was coming out. I liked Netscape, really, and I hated IE, after having tried each new release of it. Hell, I even have one of the IE 3 t-shirts that MS sent out on the night of the release, but I still disliked the browser enough to uninstall it within a week. Point being, as the Netscape 4 bugs were eating me alive, along came IE 4, so I switched. And it didn't help that AOL soon bought Netscape and almost single-handedly destroyed it. People waited years for a new release of the browser, and when 6 came along, it sucked. Yeah, MS may have cut some legal corners, but Netscape was its own worst enemy.

      --
      That light you see at the end of the tunnel might be from an oncoming train.
    35. Re:A PS2 with different games by smyle · · Score: 1
      but does anyone really remember what a complete piece of crap NS1 was?


      I still have the installer for Netscape 1.1N around somewhere. The standard at the time.

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    36. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XBOX games are 480p (non-interlaced) at least, and the developers have the option of making them 16:9 - not by letterboxing

      As was possible on the N64, which has been out for years now. 16:9 on a console is nothing new.

    37. Re:A PS2 with different games by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

      When Microsoft decides to compete with someone they usually won't win in round 1 (at least if they play fair), but when you're a half-trillion dollar company, you can afford to both throw incredible amounts of resources at a problem and wait a few years for an industry-leading product to gel out of it.

      I don't think netsape ever was an 800-lb gorilla to begin with. Sure they had a good hold on the browser market at one time, but they were never really a truly huge megacompany that microsoft was. They theoritically could eventually win like this, but i'm sure if they did this it would take MS at least a decade before they could ever overtake either sony or nintendo.

      Sony and Nintendo however, are much larger than netscape ever could have been. And now MS is fighting on 2 fronts. One against the Gamecubes launch, and the other against the ps2's 2nd generation titles.

      I think the XBox's potential lies in the ability (I would assume) to easily port Windows code over to it.

      As for the portability argument, it's not very important for the success of the console. The console's strength lies in its games, and the more games that are avaiable on only your platform, the better. If the games are available on other systems(say the pc), it doesn't strengthen the motivation to get the x-box for the "ported from windows" games, now does it?

    38. Re:A PS2 with different games by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      "This is the #1 reason I've been waiting for the XBOX, as NTSC stuff just looks poor on my 120" FPTV."

      I think you got an extra "1" in the size of your TV, dude.

    39. Re:A PS2 with different games by Archanagor · · Score: 1

      I thought they were talking about MS being the 800lb Gorilla.

      Did I misread?

    40. Re:A PS2 with different games by kill+-9+$$ · · Score: 1
      Check out Netscape 6.2, especially if you are on Linux.

      Its not nearly as bloated as previous 6.x versions, it renders fast, it renders well, and I feel that it is yet again competition for IE (with the exception on pages that stupid web developers created that use MS proprietary stuff) I also feel it kicks the crap out of Mozilla.

      --

      -- A computer without COBOL and Fortran is like a piece of chocolate cake without ketchup and mustard
    41. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MAME has been ported to Xbox.

    42. Re:A PS2 with different games by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      This is fine until you try and play something like "House of the Dead" with the light gun... Scan doubling effectively makes the gun useless, as the screen updates slower than it would otherwise.

    43. Re:A PS2 with different games by znaps · · Score: 1

      Very true.

      Remember all the fantastic games on the SNES that were the brainchild of Shigeru Myamoto? This one guy did a lot to make the SNES as successful as it was, and it wasn't about the processing ability of the console at all..

    44. Re:A PS2 with different games by rseuhs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just to check if I understand:

      You say that Sony who do several times the revenue of Microsoft worldwide can be crushed by Microsoft like a tiny startup founded by a handful of people that Netscape was?

      You really think that?

      Really?

    45. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with desigining it with the future in mind. Aren't we all supposed to have HDTVs 4 years from now?

    46. Re:A PS2 with different games by Splork · · Score: 2

      So you're saying that people with $10,000 televisions should buy Xboxes?

      Okay, that's 500 units sold. any other takers?

    47. Re:A PS2 with different games by xZAQx · · Score: 1

      WHY?

      What's the point in using netscape 6.anything on linux? What advantages does it have over Mozilla 0.95? None that I can see, however Mozilla has E6(that's a million) more features more than Nutscrape, erm, Netscape.

      Silly boy. the dragon breathes fire

      --

      We dance to all the wrong songs.
      --Refused.
    48. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TV sizes are measured diagonally across the screen. A 4:3 32" TV has about a 16.6" height. By your logic, the screen quality should be judged at about 10 feet, not 18. Also, HDTVs are designed to be viewed closer than non-HDTVs.

    49. Re:A PS2 with different games by Glytch · · Score: 2

      (but does anyone really remember what a complete piece of crap NS1 was?)

      I do. I wasn't allowed to install software on any school computers when I was in junior high, so I had a copy of Netscape 1.0 on a floppy that I carried around. Took awhile to start, but it was better than Mosaic.

    50. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with the exception on pages that stupid web developers created that use MS proprietary stuff

      Fool. Netscape and Internet Explorer both had proprietary object models. IE6 and Netscape 6 now support W3Cs model. The reason why Netscape 6 fails to work in loads of websites is because they forgot (or didn't know how) to backward support their own Netscape 4 object model which most developers and web products DID support.

      I'm fed up with Linux lovers slamming Internet Explorer. It won the browser war because it was a better product. As a web developer myself, I am frankly pleased that I don't have to write code to support a badly written browser which often (i.e. more than half the time) gave unpredictable results with well-formed HTML4 or XHTML code.

    51. Re:A PS2 with different games by Belgand · · Score: 2

      I had the chance to play Halo for about 30 min. two weeks ago when I went into Software Etc. (the only play to buy games in this town really) to pick up a copy of Civ3. Was it cool? Yeah, another guy there and I had plenty of fun driving around in the jeep and teaming up on aliens. The night mission I played was cool and interiors (the little bit of them I saw) were pretty good. But it wasn't amazing. I'll admit I didn't get into the game, but based on what I played (albeit with the horrible control that a gamepad offers for FPSs) I'd want to get a copy, but I'd probably end up spending more time on other games...

    52. Re:A PS2 with different games by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      I keep seeing people talk about all the money M$ has to throw around. Does anyone realize that Sony has a rather large bank account themselves? I serioulsy doubt M$ will be able to bully Sony Corp.

      Just my opinion though.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    53. Re:A PS2 with different games by Mr.Mean · · Score: 1

      Amen!! You also forgot to mention that the XBOX has the capability to do Dolby Digital 5.1 audio as well! Game enthusiasts meet home theater enthusiasts. :)

    54. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that there are literally 10 times more titles available for XBox and Sony PS2...

    55. Re:A PS2 with different games by Fofer · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Shenmue 2 never made it to the U.S. for Dreamcast! It was pulled at the last minute, and will now be an "X-Box Exclusive."

      That's Microsoft for ya.

    56. Re:A PS2 with different games by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >There's nothing wrong with desigining it with the future in mind.
      >Aren't we all supposed to have HDTVs 4 years from now?
      >
      >
      What you losers who were dumb enough to spend $$$$ on HDTV when you've known better than to do so are now going to force people at gunpoint to buy HDTVs? That's pretty much the only way you're going to people to buy one.

    57. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No stupid, the FCC has mandated that all stations broadcast in digital format by the end of 2003, and over half the ones in Atlanta are doing so. You probably live in the sticks, so I doubt you have tv reception of any kind. But imagine if you did, why would you want to buy something that sucks when you can buy an hdtv?
      BTW, did I type my response slowly enough for you?

    58. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess this means that if I get the PS2 instead of the XBOX, that I will have to stand outside to play games on my 36 inch hdtv. However, if I play in hidef on the XBox, I actually get to sit inside. Gee, I wonder which one I should get.

    59. Re:A PS2 with different games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha!

      what happened to that switch anyway? I want one on my N64!

    60. Re:A PS2 with different games by STratoHAKster · · Score: 1
      Useless review... Despite what anyone says about Microsoft, the XBOX is definitely a bold step ahead of the PS2 and the GameCube. Including a hard drive (as standard, not optional) and a truely workstation-class graphics chipset is something Nintendo or Sony wouldn't have done. Standard PC architecture, Visual Studio development tools... This is a console developer's dream come true...

      Do not expect the first XBOX games to really push the system. I've played both HALO and Munch's Odyssey on the XBOX and I agree that the graphics fall short of breathtaking. The first PS2 games were pretty pathetic, too - wait, most PS2 games are STILL pathetic. Check back in a few months when Sega starts releasing some of vast collection of excellent titles. Of course, Sega also has Shenmue 1/2, Crazy Taxi 2, Sonic 2, Ferrari F351, not to mention their sports games like NFL2K2 which beat the crap out of EA's PS2 counterparts.

      If you do want to see breathtaking, take a look at screenshots for Double Steal here or here.

      If the XBOX needs a "killer app" to survive, I have my money on Jet Set Future (video preview and official page). Jet Grind Radio on the Dreamcast is considered to be a masterpiece among console games (in graphics _and_ gameplay). Even if were a mirror copy of the DC version, it would be a huge hit, but Smilebit is adding multiplayer and much larger worlds to move around in.

      STratoHAK

    61. Re:A PS2 with different games by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      Heh.. I don't remember where I found it, but I've got a copy of Netscape 0.93. Single executable, no extra libs or anything. I wanna say its about 800k. It is just horrid at rendering any page designed within the last few years. Something like gnu.org or the light version of /., maybe. Every now and then, I fire it up, just for nostalgia's sake.

      Funny thing is when I just tried to open up the regular version of /. with it on my Win2k box, it crashed Netscape. Ahh, the good ol days.

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    62. Re:A PS2 with different games by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      I never said "crushed", but since the initial impressions are that the XBox is in the same ballpark as the PS2, I would give Microsoft pretty good odds of doing well against a hypothetical PS3 with a hypothetical XBox2.

      Of course, that's not considering things like marketing or Microsoft getting spanked by the DOJ (hey stranger things have happened) or someone figuring out a way to turn one platform or the other (or both) into the ultimate Linux gaming machine.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    63. Re:A PS2 with different games by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Thank you for seeing my point!

      I'm not arguing that Microsoft isn't a bully or evil or doesn't promote tooth decay. But if Microsoft were the Gandhi or software companies, Netscape 4.0 would have still blown chunks. Did Microsoft have an advantage due to size? Sure. Did that mean Netscape couldn't release good software? No! If they tried to do too much and released it too soon, regardless of the what the competition was up to, that's their problem. I first realized this when Netscape 4.0 spent several _minutes_ "making changes" to my registry.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    64. Re:A PS2 with different games by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      I didn't complete my thought... the portability argument works for _me_, but not the average user. However, I would suspect that XBox developers will be able to leverage the huge number of Windows programmers out there who don't need to learn a new platform (although I understand the PS2 development tools are good). Hey, it's better than programming an Atari 2600.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    65. Re:A PS2 with different games by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      No, not bully (although it looks like MS is bullying the independent game stores). I'm talking about throwing money at developing.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    66. Re:A PS2 with different games by rseuhs · · Score: 1

      First of all, there is a reason for Sony to still sell the PS-One.

      The reason is that the PS1 is good enough for pretty much everything and only very, very few games really need the computing power of the PS2.

      Now Microsoft wants to get into the market and creates a box that is more powerful and a lot more expensive to manufacture than the PS2 - Are you kidding me?

    67. Re:A PS2 with different games by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      I have the European version ready for import. I also hear from a friend that chain stores like Software Etc./Gamestop/Funco Land might carry it. It is in their computer system as a product that they will carry, at least.

    68. Re:A PS2 with different games by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      If they come out with the killer game (what Halo was supposed to be) I think it will spark even more interest. Of course, after Christmas it will be a different story. the PS2 could be more cemented in the lead, or the GameCube might end up being Sony's main competition.

      It's all about the games, and Sony has an almost 2 year headstart (plus an enormous catalog of good PS1 stuff... i still hear that "Playstashone" from the commercials in my head).

      Microsoft isn't dicking around here (like they were with say, Bob, or even .NET, which seems to be strictly a marketing thing at this point). I think they want a solid foothold in yet another industry to cement their power and help out in case the gov't does end up splitting up the company (which is the dumbest idea I've ever heard) or some other well-deserved punishment.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  19. Sad, sad commentary by SilentChris · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I personally sent a few stories Slashdot's way (including numerous discussions on hacking the Box) and apparently noone thought them worthy.

    The problem here is that people instantly lambash the box without thinking of the ramifications. Basically:

    - It's a strong PC with great graphics. In the living room. The centerpiece of the family community.
    - It is a console to actually push competition and strengthen games. Other consoles from here on out are going to have to consider putting an ethernet card on board. Or a hard drive. Competition is always good (even non-franchise reliant Sony is getting stale at this point).
    - It's just another system. It's not the antichrist. Bill Gates personally doesn't take a cut on each box (in fact, cuts are probably taken out of HIM).

    Let's think about that first one a good deal. A real PC. In the living room of thousands of people -- people, additionally, who wouldn't have thought of putting a PC in their living room. Why doesn't this get more people excited? It does for me. Naysayers like to tout X-Filish conspiracy theories about MS owning the world. It's not going to happen. Other companies are going to expand, reject, and strengthen parts of the box with 3rd party peripherals and software. The dream of having some kind of decent server in everyone's house will finally be realized.

    Even if you completely reject the box and all it's strong points, you've got to admit THE CONVERSATION IS GOOD. Unfortunately, even with a thousand comments, Slashdot editors won't learn that this is one of the things we want to talk about. And quite frankly, I still like to follow the average Slashdotter's opinion over hype.

    1. Re:Sad, sad commentary by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      so will this finaly make apple drop its prices since they will not be the only closed home PC system in town anymore :-)

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Sad, sad commentary by CaseyB · · Score: 3, Flamebait
      It's just another system. It's not the antichrist.

      What kills me, is people promoting Sony and Nintendo over MS, for reasons of business ethics! These companies are at least as predatory and monopolistic as MS ever was, in a nation that practically invented the concept.

    3. Re:Sad, sad commentary by ColonBlow · · Score: 1

      convergence is going to happen one way or another, I just don't want the monopoly reaching it's hands (w/ hardware now as well as software) into the family room. Next thing you know I'll be sitting on an MS IP Toilet. Innovation is happening all the time and will get there with or without Microsofts help.

      --
      free online diet tracking.
    4. Re:Sad, sad commentary by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      MS IP Toilet?

      Nope! MIT already has enough proof of the concept that MS can't copyright IP Toilets.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    5. Re:Sad, sad commentary by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Next thing you know I'll be sitting on an MS IP Toilet.

      I've seen many a toilet bearing a little sticker that said "Designed for Microsoft Windows 95".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:Sad, sad commentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the average Slashdotter's opinion over hype

      If it has anything to do with Microsoft, you should already know what the average Slashdotter's reaction is.

    7. Re:Sad, sad commentary by Chundra · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gimme a break.

      Repeat after me: "The whole point of a gaming console is to play games."

      Most people don't buy consoles to double as a bloody servers. Sure, it can be done, and there's a lot of hack value there, but dude...get a clue! "The dream of having some kind of decent server in everyone's house" is NOT going to happen with an Xbox. Maybe with a good PC with a good OS, but NOT some mediocre gaming console. Compared to real PCs made in the last year or so, the xbox is by no means "a strong PC".

      Lemme turn your argument around a little bit. Hey guys! I'm really excited. My furnace and air conditioner contain a Hitachi H8/3292 microcontroller, which is really a pretty hefty little CPU. I'm gonna hack the thing and run a server on my airconditioner! It keeps me cool in the summer, warm in the winter, it serves mp3s, and is now running Apache! Finally! The dream of running a server can be realized by the masses. w00t!

      Bah.

    8. Re:Sad, sad commentary by Alan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe there's a larger picture that we're not seeing here. X-Box is taking MS out of the computer room and putting it into the living room. From what I remember MS has another home entertainment system they are going to be developing / pushing that will do the same thing. Maybe they are hoping to be the vendor for ANYTHING electronic that you do, from checking your email to defrosting your car...

    9. Re:Sad, sad commentary by SA3Steve · · Score: 1

      How can you say that Microsoft's 'monopoly' is reaching into the game consoles? How has their monopoly helped them here? By having money to market? That's not wrong... I don't see where you make the leap that their monopoly is reaching into your home gaming stuff. They are going into a new field...they don't have a monopoly there nor are they able to use their desktop business there realistically.

    10. Re:Sad, sad commentary by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      "The problem here is that people instantly lambash the box without thinking of the ramifications."

      Sorry...couldn't resist: I'm sure you meant to say lambast.

      But you do have a point, to an extent, that the design is going to influence future consoles from Sony and Nintendo. Nintendo has already reactively defended their decision not to support playing movie DVD's.

    11. Re:Sad, sad commentary by geofft · · Score: 1

      > I personally sent a few stories Slashdot's way (including numerous discussions on hacking the
      > Box) and apparently noone thought them worthy.

      Some of us might find them worthy -- care to post links?

    12. Re:Sad, sad commentary by maddman75 · · Score: 1

      Umm, could it be that thier monopoly on the desktop is what is making it so easy for developers to produce games? This 'advantage' that everyone already knows how to program for it is nothing more but another example of MS using thier monopoly power to leverage thier way into even mroe markets.

      --
      -- When a fool hears of the Tao, he will laugh out loud.
    13. Re:Sad, sad commentary by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      "Maybe they are hoping to be the vendor for ANYTHING electronic that you do, from checking your email to defrosting your car..."

      Once again, X-Filish conspiracies. I'll pass.

    14. Re:Sad, sad commentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lemme turn your argument around a little bit

      Hey guys! I'm really excited. My Television now can do colour and has these RCA ports!! i bet i can buy a device that would plug into those ports and let me watch movies on the teevee!!! or maybe a console that would plug into it and let me play games on the teevee!! The dream of watching a movie in something other than the theatre and playing a video game in something other than an arcade can be realized. w00t!

      products change and so can their purpose. the salon article repeatedly mentions how consoles are trying to overcome being solely a gamin device and how the X-box is lined up to do precisely this, if only they would have Tried.

    15. Re:Sad, sad commentary by ethereal · · Score: 1

      In this case, it's "rather the devil we don't know, than the devil we do" - Microsoft public relations at work :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    16. Re:Sad, sad commentary by MedManDC · · Score: 1

      The word is lambaste, I believe.

    17. Re:Sad, sad commentary by MedManDC · · Score: 1

      doh! my bad, it can be either. sorry.

    18. Re:Sad, sad commentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we need a personality test for moderators....aparently this moron could not see the levity in my stament....I was not trying to flame Apple....I was trying to make a point about where the PC industry is headed.....my god you dumb fuck I hope you don't read the onion news.

    19. Re:Sad, sad commentary by DebtAngel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lemme turn your argument around a little bit. Hey guys! I'm really excited. My furnace and air conditioner contain a Hitachi H8/3292 microcontroller, which is really a pretty hefty little CPU. I'm gonna hack the thing and run a server on my airconditioner! It keeps me cool in the summer, warm in the winter, it serves mp3s, and is now running Apache! Finally! The dream of running a server can be realized by the masses. w00t!

      Let me turn that around a bit.

      Hey geys! Check this out! I have an MP3 and web server with the best case cooling on the planet. In fact, it not only cools itself, but the entire room. This is the ultimate solution for all your case cooling needs.

      Thanks for playing though. :)

      --

      Is this post not nifty? Sluggy Freelance. Worshi

    20. Re:Sad, sad commentary by SA3Steve · · Score: 1

      That is lame. You are claiming that since people know how to develop for it, that is an abuse of power? I guess since a lot of developers know how to use C++, we shouldn't be using that to code new products...it doesn't give new languages a chance!

    21. Re:Sad, sad commentary by domc · · Score: 1

      If you are talking about an illegal monopoly; yes, it is an abuse of power. The rules change when you are a monopoly.

      domc

    22. Re:Sad, sad commentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are talking about an illegal monopoly; yes, it is an abuse of power. The rules change when you are a monopoly.

      Thanks for that bit of insight. As a developer, what I really, really do NOT want to do is spend all my time learning 10,000 different languages for 10,000 different APIs for 10,000 different platforms.

      If an "illegal (sic) monopoly" can save me from such a fate, it's good for me, and that means it's good for my users, and that means it's good for you. Don't knock it. Monopolies in operating systems simply make sense.

    23. Re:Sad, sad commentary by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      "Let's think about that first one a good deal. A real PC. In the living room of thousands of people -- people, additionally, who wouldn't have thought of putting a PC in their living room. Why doesn't this get more people excited?"

      'Cause you can't get Instant Messages on it?

    24. Re:Sad, sad commentary by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The problem here is that people instantly lambash the box without thinking of the ramifications.

      The problem here is that you are basing your support of xbox on mistaken assumptions.

      - It's a strong PC with great graphics. In the living room. The centerpiece of the family community.

      So is a PS2 or a GC. PC stands for "Personal Computer", not "x86-based platform" you know. While the xbox has more power, the PS2's CPU(s) is (Are) not to be written off so easily.

      - It is a console to actually push competition and strengthen games. Other consoles from here on out are going to have to consider putting an ethernet card on board. Or a hard drive.

      A hard drive doesn't fit with nintendo's strategy, nevertheless expect to see one on their next generation system. A hard drive is already available for PS2, as part of the linux upgrade. This also gives you VGA output, btw. And ethernet. Of course, with IEEE1394 and USB, ethernet is already within reach.

      Competition is always good (even non-franchise reliant Sony is getting stale at this point).

      Competition is good. Microsoft, however, starts competitive, and ends anticompetitive. Or, more to the point, other people end when they become anticompetitive.

      - It's just another system. It's not the antichrist. Bill Gates personally doesn't take a cut on each box (in fact, cuts are probably taken out of HIM).

      If M$ is losing money now (It's microsoft and not bill gates that is the issue here; If bill dropped dead tomorrow it would keep doing what it's doing almost without pause) then you can be sure they'll make it up later; This is strategic, as is everything else microsoft does.

      Other companies are going to expand, reject, and strengthen parts of the box with 3rd party peripherals and software. The dream of having some kind of decent server in everyone's house will finally be realized.

      Server? It's a game console. It is designed to do one thing well - Play games. While it is capable of doing other things, a "decent server" it is not. Especially considering the limited nature of its storage; Any additional free store will have to be networked, especially in the non-hacker consumer space.

      Other companies are going to expand, reject, and strengthen parts of the box with 3rd party peripherals and software.

      Yeah, that's great. Too bad they won't be able to change the CPU, storage devices, or ethernet - The stuff that you're getting so excited about. There's no provision for any real expansion - Not that there is on the other consoles, either.

      People will not have real PCs (of any architecture) in their living room and using them just as they would a PC until high-resolution large-format LCD or Gas Plasma displays come down in price dramatically. Try not to get too excited.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:Sad, sad commentary by domc · · Score: 1

      So, what you are saying is that you are willing to sacrifce long-term diversity for your short-term convenience? You might want to re-evaluate that plan. While diversity may make your sad life less complicated, you need to realize that it is the best thing for the future.

      And, yes, MS is an "illegal monopoly", and yes being such means that they must follow a different set of rules than non-monopolizers -- even if it makes your pathetic life harder.

      domc

    26. Re:Sad, sad commentary by theancient2 · · Score: 1

      Since this thing is pretty much a standard PC on the inside, shouldn't that make it much easier to write an emulator for it, so we can run games for the Xbox on the PC?

      Or, to write software that runs on the Xbox? What kind of restrictions does this thing have?

    27. Re:Sad, sad commentary by Glytch · · Score: 2

      I wonder how much effort it would take to make a toilet in the shape of a PC that looks like it's fallen backwards? Maybe have a BSOD painted on the inside of the bowl.

      I'll leave your sick imaginations think of ways to properly thank MS.

    28. Re:Sad, sad commentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dream of having some kind of decent server in everyone's house will finally be realized.

      GOOD GOD! Please tell me IIS isn't on the box!

  20. I played one at a kiosk by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 0, Troll

    I played Halo. I only played the first level. I was not impressed. The graphics were sub-par, for a geforce3 I was expecting a LOT more. It froze for a few seconds every time you walked into a new room to 'load' the remainding part of the map. The enemies were stupid.

    On top of all this, how are you supposed to control a FPS with your thumb? FPS games were meant for computers, not consoles. (except goldenye... that game RULED)

    1. Re:I played one at a kiosk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno, you can't judge the graphics of a game like that on the cheapass TV in those kiosks. If you played it on an HDTV, or on PC (gawd, I hope it comes out for PC), the graphics would be FAR superior. I have a PC with a GF3 in it, and believe me; the graphics that thing is capable of pumping out are just freakin' incredible, even without any games taking real advantage of the card.

    2. Re:I played one at a kiosk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does have a GeForce 3 (actually 1 gen ahead of GF3) but don't expect PC quality graphics.

      The XBox only has 32 MB for the binary/vertex data/textures/audio/frame buffers since it uses main RAM for everything.... You'll be suprised how quickly you run out of space when writing a console game. Finding space for textures is the hardest part and is usually where you compromise quality for mem space. You must either cutback on content or find a smart way to load off the DVD/HD at runtime without slowing down the game (yeah right). Don't bother replying unless you've actually developed for a console cuz it's not liike writing a PC game.

      Another thing is that it's easier to go from 20->40 FPS than it is to go from 40->60 FPS. PC games have the tendency to drop frames. COnsole games are expected to run a solid 60 FPS... so they can't make it as detailed as a PC game.

    3. Re:I played one at a kiosk by liposuction · · Score: 0

      It's not even a Geforce 3. Not only that, but the intel processor has the power of a celeron, and in the two time's i've played a kiosk, it's crashed. Both times on Halo.

      Nice post though. You're right on about FPS.

      --
      "Thoughts are more powerful than any weapon, and I don't even let my people own guns." --Joseph Stalin
    4. Re:I played one at a kiosk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more than a GeForce3... GF3 has 1 vertex pipeline... the xbox gpu has 2... plus more texture units. There also a lot of other features that will make it into nvidia's next iteration of consumer level boards. You can compare the xbox gpu to the nVidia Quadro DCC board

  21. why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Almost every article on the Xbox I see on Slashdot is slanted against them. The Gamecube gets much more coverage and not the nasty slashdot commentary along with the story.

    Is this my imagination, or does slashdot take its anti-microsoft bias into everything they do?

    I mean really, linking the xbox release with one totally negative article, while other sites have given it a much better outlook.

    Please try to be fair here slashdot.

    1. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by revscat · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I mean really, linking the xbox release with one totally negative article, while other sites have given it a much better outlook. Please try to be fair here slashdot.

      BWAHAHAHAHA! Asking /. to be fair and balanced when dealing with M$-related things is like asking Rush Limbaugh to stop parroting Republican dogma: i.e., it just won't happen.

    2. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yah i've asked him to stop parroting republican dogma before actually...but he just keeps going, its like he doesn't even hear me.

    3. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by dakoda · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First, yes, the /. community is very anti-m$. with good reason too. i actually support them usually (i have having to reboot win every 3 hours becasue it leaks too much, while i easily get months of uptime with linux and bang on it more too, among other things).

      But, in regards to the Gamecube, I have _no_ idea why it isnt hammered as well. do the /. readers not know how much nintendo is like m$, esp when it comes to emulation etc? given that both companies are similar (anti-open), i'd think they'd both get knocked at least a little.

      i recall hearing about an open game console. did this ever happen?

    4. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by haggar · · Score: 1

      I see one reason why people on Slashdot are biased against the Xbox: they understand that Microsoft is using a visious strategy to get the competitiors out. Simply, MS has a lot of money generated from other markets (software) which it uses to
      a) pay developers to make games (direct or inidrect payment, like waiving the license costs)
      b) putting US$ 500.000.000 into advertising
      c) keeping the price of the Xbox artificially low

      MS can do this, it can afford to lose 3 to 4 billions in the first year. 3 to 4 billions will KILL Sony. MS makes it in one quarter.

      That's visious, the typical Slashdot reader understands this mechanism, hence the hatred.

      --
      Sigged!
    5. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Trifthen · · Score: 4, Troll

      Is this my imagination, or does slashdot take its anti-microsoft bias into everything they do?

      Well, you had to say it, didn't you? I'm not going to defend Slashdot posters, other gaming platforms, or even myself. What I will tell you is that this isn't restricted to the Slashdot crowd.

      Go on over to the The GIA and read their double-agent columns for a while. You'll get more than a few comments for and against the XBox. The one that really stood out to me though, was this one: YOU BIG BULLY!

      There's the truth right there. Microsoft has had years to get into the game, and only does so now. Why now? Where were they back when I was 13, playing Zelda or Sonic? The problem is, company profiteering notwithstanding, they're making it obvious that's all they're interested in. "Oh look! The gaming industry has lots of money! We can get some of that!"

      Not the best way to make friends.

      Besides that, have you actually read what the general gaming community thinks about the XBox? I've talked to random people I meet in gaming stores, and I hear the same damn thing every time. "The Xbox is the size of a Buick," or "The controller could kill small children," and even a "Microsoft makes shit, and I won't buy it." These are the very people Microsoft is trying to target, here. What makes you think Slashdot is going to be more forgiving than your average gamer? The Slashdot bias is assumed.

      But head on over to Penny Arcade if you think Salon is being harsh. Dear Sweet Merciful God, this thing is the laughing stock of the entire gaming community, and they seem completely blind to it.

      I've been gaming since I was 5. Xbox is a me-too, and I'm not impressed. Go home, little Xbox, I don't want to play with arrogant bastards like you.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    6. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by SA3Steve · · Score: 1

      Couldn't the same be said about Sony with the Playstation 1? What was it doing jumping into the gaming industry? I am glad it did though. If the XBox isn't good, it will fail regardless of the marketing on it. You can't fault a company for spending money on its products. There is nothing illegal about that.

    7. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by atlep · · Score: 1
      Is this my imagination, or does slashdot take its anti-microsoft bias into everything they do?

      I absolutely do. Microsoft has never played nice, so why should I be nice towards MS?

      MS takes money from me wether I want to or not since they push preinstalled stuff everywhere. I try to avoid MS products whenever I can, and I try my best to show the people around me the alternatives.

      Yes, competition is good. MS has shown itself to be, in essence, anti-competition. In short-term the X-box is a good thing, but because MS is behind I believe that the long-term effect will be good only if MS looses market and/or money on this project. I would welcome the X-box from almost any other company, but not from MS.

      Yes, I am anti-Micorsoft. Because I think it is important.

    8. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that just proves my point. Sony actually did make games before they attempted to join up with Nintendo. But The Playstation 1 has been around for at least five years. Where was Microsoft back then?

      Besides that, Microsoft does make games. Why do they suddenly need a console even though it has nothing to do with their core business model? Sony has always been in the entertainment and hardware 'biz.

      Truthfully though, even though I own a PS2, the Gamecube is probably the best true gaming platform out there outside of the Dreamcast. You can tell it was designed for gaming, and gaming only. That's the kind of thing gamers like to see - some concentration.

      Microsoft is taking a big risk with this endevor, and if they keep ignoring what people are saying, they'll fall flat on their ass for it. I know about a dozen gamers or so, and only one has a friend that will buy an Xbox. You got that right, I only know a friend of a friend who wants an Xbox. How sad is that?

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    9. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 to 4 billions will KILL Sony

      Good. I'd like to see one company that uses proprietary standards to kill another that uses proprietary standards, such as Sony and their damned Memory Stick. I'd like to see them battle it out. No one loses.

    10. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 5, Funny
      Is this my imagination, or does slashdot take its anti-microsoft bias into everything they do?

      You say this like it's some kind of big secret that the Slashdot crowd's feelings about Microsoft range from mild antipathy to deep loathing. Are you the same guy who visits Macintosh advocacy sites and wonders why there's no positive press on Gateway and Dell?

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    11. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by MarkLR · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what Sony and all other console companies are doing. The model of the console industry is to sell the consoles at a loss and charge the developers money for each game they sell. If you buy an X-Box game MS gets $10, if you buy a PS2 game Sony gets $10. If you buy a console and only play one game on it the console maker lost a lot of money.

    12. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      The PlayStation made a great system because it was originally going to be the CDROM for the Super Nintendo!

    13. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1

      I mean really, linking the xbox release with one totally negative article, while other sites have given it a much better outlook.

      What other sites exactly ?

      If you want your arguments to gain some weight, you better arm them with solid references, which is not the case here.

    14. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      Nobody wants to buy them, yet I can't get my hands on one, they're damn sold out. Which makes you a liar. Of course MS is taking a risk, but I'm sure it'll be a successfull console. I'm getting one pretty soon while you're still whinning about the fact that BG is better than you.

    15. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by CodingFiend · · Score: 1

      Lol, why do you sound surprised? Ever notice the borgified icon of Bill Gates? That should tell you right up front what to expect here. Not saying it's bad or good, just that this is the way it is. If you don't like it, then find a site that is more neutral, or if you choose, one that is more pro-MS.

      --


      And that's my $0.32 (adjusted for inflation).
    16. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      Microsoft has had years to get into the game, and only does so now. Why now? Where were they back when I was 13, playing Zelda or Sonic?

      The same place Sony was, I guess. What's your point? No existing companies should ever branch into new business? By this argument, you should be pissed that IBM and other big players have dared to invest in Linux. ("Where were they 8 years ago? How dare they try to get a piece of the Linux pie?")

      "Oh look! The gaming industry has lots of money! We can get some of that!"

      What utopian hippy planet are you from? That's the motivation of EVERY company, by definition!

    17. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Penny-Arcade has ripped on Xbox in rants and in comics on many occasions. Did you NOT see the comic talking about them firing most of the staff at oddworld inhabitants once munch was in the can?

    18. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so i'm not the first to notice? :) no, this has been a theme of slashdot all along. its not a news site, its a microsoft bashing site. along every article that mentions microsoft even if its a positive one you will find a negative ending comment by the editors. '"bill gates gave $1 billion to the sept 11th fund" - well he must want to monopolize another section of the world' or something to that effect. you get the idea.

    19. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The gaming community as a whole pretty much looks down upon the XBox. Why? Because the XBox has nothing you can't get elsewhere. Sony has already sold umpteen million PS2s, and with games like Metal Gear Solid 2 (finished it yesterday.. Bar none one of the best games I've ever played) there's no real compelling reason to buy an XBox.

      Yes, I know MGS2 is supposed to make it to XBox, but that's exactly my point. I'm not going to buy the same game twice. Every major title on XBox is available elsewhere, with the exception of Halo, which I wasn't really impressed with. It's just another FPS (and it felt like a Tribes ripoff) added to the fact that FPS games really don't play well on consoles. I'm not saying the XBox is bad/evil because it's made by Microsoft, I'm saying that I see no real reason to buy one. Most of my "non hardcore" gamer friends feel the same. Their attitude is "I already have a PS2, I don't need another one." The hardcore gamers hate the thing because it's Microsoft. I have a feeling this will be a failed experiment for Bill and Steve.

    20. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20010322. html

    21. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Osty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a) pay developers to make games (direct or inidrect payment, like waiving the license costs)

      Give proof, please. Considering the fact that the way to make money in the video game console business is to take a cut on each game sold, this doesn't make sense. Also, I've never seen anything but wild rumor-mongering and speculation that this is happening, anyway (well, sure, unless you count Microsoft purchasing Bungie and Oddworld Inhabitants, but two developers out of 150+ is not a trend).


      b) putting US$ 500.000.000 into advertising

      And Sony doesn't have an advertising budget? Or Nintendo? Or Sega, back when they were a contender? So maybe they never spent quite as much, but I'd expect Sony spent close with the PS2.


      c) keeping the price of the Xbox artificially low

      Hello? Anybody in there? This is HOW THE MARKET WORKS for video game consoles. Nintendo does this. Sony does this. Sega even did this, up to the point where they bailed out on the Dreamcast. Hell, even Indrema was going to have to do this if they wanted to be competitive. Now, I could see this argument if Microsoft were selling the XBox for $100 or $150 right out of the gate, but when it's being priced at a competitive $299 (same as PS2, $100 more than GameCube), I don't see where this is relevant.



      MS can do this, it can afford to lose 3 to 4 billions in the first year. 3 to 4 billions will KILL Sony. MS makes it in one quarter.

      Microsoft losing 3-4 billion does not mean Sony will also lose 3-4 billion. And even if Sony were to lose that much in the video game market (which they won't), Sony is a very large company with their fingers in lots of different pies. Their video game division might be in for some rough times, but how is that new? Since the old NES (and probably before, though I wasn't into gaming then), there has never been a company that has successfully turned its lead in the market in one generation over to a lead in the market in the next. NES, Genesis, and Playstation. Nintendo hung in there, and Sega did for a while (still at it with the great games). The "winner" of this next generation is obviously not clear yet, but the XBox is a contender at the very least. If Sony can pull off a repeat of the success of the Playstation, more power too them. But just because they had something good with the PSX doesn't mean they automatically have something good with the PS2 (it's decent, but with its difficulty to program, don't be surprised when more and more developers flock to the GCN and XBox, which are both much easier to program).

    22. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you actually do enjoy the gaming console industry and think it is a worthwhile market, you will NOT support Microsoft's entry into it. IN every market where Microsoft has bludgeoned their way to top-dog status, the results have been poorer quality products for end users and less choice. I appreciate more competition as much as the next guy, but I am rooting for the Xbox to be KILLED as fast as possible so as to avoid the situation we have now with PC's.

    23. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      The xbox has no good games and no good developers with the exception of Sega which is making games for every system.

      The truth is that MS is scared. They screwed up on the xbox. They lose $120 on each console in order to keep the price down to $300 while Nintendo's GC only costs $180 to make and in the end Nintendo only loses $20 on each $200 console. MS spent all this money making the "most powerful console ever" (although they could have made it more powerful for cheaper by choose an alternative CPU than an x86 based one, but that would break compatibility with the thousands of existing Win32 x86 applications), and gave it things like a hd (so you can store music?? Imagine a suspense game like RE, but replace the music the developer uses to build suspense with RAVE/Metal/Rap/Country/whatever you like and see how suspensful the game is...) for no reason, ethernet (although they weren't able to have a game network yet, and broad band has had a ton of trouble catching on in the way MS had planned for), HTDV output (when 99% of the gamers don't get to hook up the system to anything but a regular NTSC/PAL system...), Dolby 5.1 output (when most gamers just use stereo...), etc.

      Sony is most likely going to beat the pants of MS and Nintendo because they have best developers writing for their platform, even though they have the least powerful platform. If MS used a PentiumII 500 and a GeForce 2 instead of a PentiumIII 733/"GeForce3" and bought exclusive rights to Gran Tourismo and Metal Gear Solid they'd do much better in the market place. Other than maybe a million geeks worldwide which really care about technology to the point they'll sacrafice getting quality games the rest of the world just wants something they can put a disc in, turn on, and HAVE FUN. ENTERTAINMENT sells to those people, not technology.

      A slightly more powerful console produces fancier graphics, but it does not produce more FUN.

      The reason /. and many other sites seem anti-xbox is because they make fun of it because it doesn't have *fun* titles. The game cube games, despite kiddie graphics, are FUN.

    24. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Naerbnic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, at least Sony had a good reason: Nintendo screwed them over.

      This is fairly common knowledge, but I'll repeat it here. Sony was once Nintendo's partner when both were working on a CD-ROM Attachment to the Super Nintendo. But Nintendo went on to bluer waters, leaving Sony with a mostly functional CD-ROM/Gaming system. Sony is, of course, put out by this, so instead of deciding to sink the large funds they've put into the system, the add a main processor and archetecture around it, creating the Playstation.

      So compared to Microsoft's entering of the arena, Sony's entrance would be considered downright accidental. Who knew it would become the most popular system of the day?

      --


      So there I was, juggling apples and small animals, when I accidentally bit into the wrong one...
    25. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Mike+the+Mac+Geek · · Score: 1

      There's a reason other than that why Sony got into the biz. Sony was developing the PSX originally as an Add-on to the SNES, kinda like the Sega CD idea. After a few years dev, Sony had this great system, but Nintendo backed out last minute, scared that Sony was going to end up running the whole show. Nintendo then started to work with Panasonic for hardware developing. Sony was then stuck with this great piece of hardware. They just adapted it, and with a bit of prodding from Ken Kutagari, released the PSX.

      They wanted to see if they could recoup some R&D, they had no idea it would take off. But once it did, they would have been stupid not to keep it advancing.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- ---- The man, the myth, the something or other.
    26. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Y'know? There's nothing so touching as these little rants from people who are finally starting to understand the way the world works. The loss of innocence is so poignantly portrayed in the way they rage against what they see as an entirely new phenomenon.

      You can just see the collapse of the childhood dreamworld in their eyes, as others point out the brutal truth: that the same things have been happening for ages, that the world is a cold and unforgiving machine, and indeed that those they've known as friends are in fact their enemies.

    27. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by siphoncolder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it's absolutely true - the anti-MS FUD campaign is unbelievable, in every respect of the word.

      just recently, i was at my local electronics boutique. i was talking with the sales rep there, and of course there were the mandatory kids in there eying all the games & consoles. at the time, they were staring at the display consoles that were hooked up - one PS2, one xbox. the screens in EB are mounted in the ceiling, so it's not readily apparant which console is which unless you know the games.

      they started yapping about the xbox sucking, ps2 is better, etc etc etc. me & the sales guy looked at them & asked them what was so bad about the xbox, and they came out with the "ms sucks" or the "gamecube will rock" rhetoric. the sales rep argued back with xbox's actual capabilities, but they'd have none of that: this was xbox, MS's evil handiwork, and therefore it would have to suck.

      after some time, they left. the sales rep switched games in the display setups and put in some other games.

      same kids come back. they started staring at the screen for Project Gotham (xbox), and started ooooooohing and aaaaaaahhhing.

      sales rep smiles, goes up to them & tells them a bald-faced lie:

      "that's a new PS2 game coming out soon"

      they started talking about how awesome the graphics were, staring at how u could see the men inside the cars actually turning the wheel, the detail, textures, etc.

      "you idiots, that's not a PS2. that's an xbox." and he reset the xbox console to prove it.

      FUD works, and quite well. too bad some people resort to it without knowing the REAL facts.

      --
      i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
    28. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Puk · · Score: 2

      These are the very people Microsoft is trying to target, here.

      Is this true? I'm not saying it's not true, just that I'm not sure.

      What I wonder is -- what percentage of consoles are bought by "gamers", and what percentage by "other". "Other" includes parents buying for their kids, college students who want a console in their dorm to mess around with, and the like.

      What's the breakdown for console _games_?

      Companies don't care if they are hated by a core group that spends the most mental energy on gaming, only if they sell more consoles to those who spend the most money on gaming.

      Does anyone have any statistics like what I'm asking for?

      -Puk

    29. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1

      I don't like ACs and specially the ones that post old links, very very old links.

      This link is dated from March!!! (pulpit 2001/ 03/22 .html) Damn it! wake up! Robert didn't have a clue at that time what the X-box would look like, what games it would offer and what the future of this console would be.

      X-Box, which will launch with 26 games ... but X-Box is aimed at a different market segment than Nintendo's GameCube. X-Box users will be older, generally in their 20s and 30s, and drawn primarily from the ranks of PC gamers.

      A different market ? Like i should rush out to the store and buy this crappy console. I don't think so. By reading other /. users' comment, the games seem not to be aimed at hard core PC gamers, like myself, at all. And for most critics i read about the X-box 26 (!!??) games, they do not constitute something i would rush to store for.

      Sorry that link is as bad as a picture of fat bastard on a toilet seat.

    30. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Redneck+Genius · · Score: 1

      Also, that "green screen of death" you guys posted was the xbox dev kit.

      Very misleading of you M$ haters.

    31. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was called indrema and not surprisingly, it failed miserably, before production models were even available they axed the project. that's the power of open source.

    32. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the only reason they did so - was so they could share profits with nintendo. Honestly - why do you think companies release products?

    33. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by tt2k1 · · Score: -1
      Yeah, seriously... I just stopped by my local (DC-area) Babbage's to pick up my reserved copy of MGS2, and the staff was incredibly relieved that I wasn't there to ask about the Xbox -- apparently they are getting absolutely swamped with Xbox inquiries, and every store in the area sold out its Xbox preorders weeks ago.

      But, of course, there are plenty of Gamecubes around. :-)

      --

      Troll Tuesday 2001.

      --The Mess

    34. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Tom7 · · Score: 1


      What are the REAL facts? Stupid, gullible kids like the Xbox?

    35. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by shinji · · Score: 1

      I ask the reverse question how can you be pro-MS or even MS-agnostic. MS has proven it self to be a blight on the computing world. Do you expect it to be anything else in another market. Microsoft is only interested in taking your money not in the value they provide to you. Check out the license fees for .NET not only to developers but end users also. The are the only company I can think of that the user is expected to service the computer not the company service the user.

      I refuse to give them money for my desktop which I actually need. There is no way I'm giving them money for something for entertainment. Even If the XBox is the greatest thing and the most advanced console ever I will NEVER buy one. People need to have the balls to say 'I don't like your business practices so I won't use your products'. VOTE WITH YOUR DOLLARS! Thats what companies understand. You can bash MS all day long but if at the end of the day you go to WalMart and buy an XBox MS will smile even bigger. Someone who supposely hates them is still inclined to give them money.

      --
      Remove the spam reference to email
    36. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      Actually, there's a pretty hefty pro-Microsoft slant here too, I've noticed. Slashdot isn't so much a Linux/Open Source forum as it is a "tech" forum now.

    37. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree...
      other sites have an artificial pro microsoft bias, vs slashdot which is a true , 'grassroots' this is what we think: they suck' attitude.
      Look at C-Net, who has like 8 articles about the XBox today..... there has to be somehting to counter that...

    38. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was the xbox casing removed and the rest stuck in a fridge?

    39. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      typical softie.. you focus on the color of the screen, not that it crashes..

      Oh well, somday MS will go the way of Unisys..

    40. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by haggar · · Score: 1

      Considering the fact that the way to make money in the video game console business is to take a cut on each game sold, this doesn't make sense.
      It does when you have enough money and want to push your competitors out of business.

      And Sony doesn't have an advertising budget? Or Nintendo? Or Sega, back when they were a contender? So maybe they never spent quite as much, but I'd expect Sony spent close with the PS2.
      The difference is in the amount, and it's considerable.

      Hello? Anybody in there? This is HOW THE MARKET WORKS for video game consoles. Nintendo does this. Sony does this. Sega even did this, up to the point where they bailed out on the Dreamcast. Hell, even Indrema was going to have to do this if they wanted to be competitive. Now, I could see this argument if Microsoft were selling the XBox for $100 or $150 right out of the gate, but when it's being priced at a competitive $299 (same as PS2, $100 more than GameCube), I don't see where this is relevant.
      The specs of the Xbox are much higher than the PS/2. MS is losing much more money per unit than does Sony. And that might make all the difference.

      Incidently, all your contraarguments didn't convince me one bit. But have a nice day nevertheless.

      --
      Sigged!
    41. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      other sites have an artificial pro microsoft bias, vs slashdot which is a true , 'grassroots'

      I'd hardly say Slashdot represents your average Joe. The mainstream media probably better represents what people in general think. (Especially since what people think is influenced so much by the media.) But even among the real life "geeks" I know, there are very few people who are anti-Microsoft. Slashdot tends to attract pro-Linux people (it's even owned by a Linux company), so that's the kind of response you can expect.

    42. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a crash. It's an error message. Read what the message is saying. You could translate it as, "you put a PS2 disc in the machine, and I can't read it." And it's from the development kit, not from the Xbox. That's three strikes.

    43. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Glytch · · Score: 2

      Sold out? Jeez, come on up to the Bathurst, New Brunswick Walmart. I've got a stockroom *full* of the things. I sold about three today.

    44. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you get to be so clueless?

      I mean really. You're talking about little pissant web sites with fan boys on them. Its meaningless.

      Im' not going to buy an X box right off, but I'm going to as soon as some good games get ported.

      The PS/2 is a "me too!" box, and not a very good one. And yes, I own one.

    45. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      Um... I think you missed the point. I
      basically said, "If you think Salon was brutal,
      you should see what Penny Arcade had to say.
      They think the XBox is shit on a shingle."



      There. Is that clear enough for you?

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    46. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      well, slashdot is as much a pro-linux advocacy site as it is an anti-ms site.

      I'm used to all the anti-ms stuff here, but michael takes it to the next level. I aint asking for positive press, just some sort of professionalism and decency. michael definitely has neither wrt to this issue.

    47. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by ameoba · · Score: 2

      Well, once it was decided that Microsoft was the Great Satan it's only being self consistant to talk smack about them on all fronts. If they are an evil, money grubbing monopoly that consistantly puts out buggy, bloated, insecure software then, as the technical elite, we are morally obligated to take a stand against them on all fronts.

      Saying "I hate everything about Microsoft. Windows is the Devil" and then going out to buy an xbox is nothing but hipocracy. The fact that Slashdot has consistantly contributed to the hype of the xbox reminds me of watching "American History X".

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    48. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by ameoba · · Score: 2

      The "accidental discovery" of the PSX kinda explains why, when they -tried- to design a system, they ended up making the PS2.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    49. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Osty · · Score: 1


      Considering the fact that the way to make money in the video game console business is to take a cut on each game sold, this doesn't make sense.

      It does when you have enough money and want to push your competitors out of business.

      First off, that's hardly proving your statement with facts (part of my reply which you conveniently cut and ignored ...). Second, Microsoft has these silly people called "share holders", to whom they're financially responsible, and taking billions of dollars in losses won't keep those "share holders" happy very long (the only reason they're happy with the XBox in the first place is the promise of licensing revenue, which you're suggesting they're waiving). Silly fear-mongering, nothing more.



      And Sony doesn't have an advertising budget? Or Nintendo? Or Sega, back when they were a contender? So maybe they never spent quite as much, but I'd expect Sony spent close with the PS2.

      The difference is in the amount, and it's considerable.

      I'd be interested in seeing Sony's advertising budget. Mind sharing? Regardless, the $500mil Microsoft is spending is spread over 18 months. A year and a half. When 30-second Super Bowl ad spots go for half a million or more (just for the spot, not even counting the amount of money that goes into making those commercials), $500mil over a year and a half (two Super Bowls) isn't all that much. I seem to recall reading somewhere that Nintendo is spending near that amount as well, though they gave per-year numbers so it looked smaller. Can't remember the link, though. Maybe you can?


      The specs of the Xbox are much higher than the PS/2. MS is losing much more money per unit than does Sony. And that might make all the difference.

      The normally-quoted numbers are that Microsoft is losing between $100 and $150 per console. That's roughly the same amount Sony was losing per PS2 at launch time (where the PS2 launched $100 more expensive than the XBox). The XBox's specs may be higher, but the PS2 has more custom parts, which are pretty expensive as well (plus, it uses Rambus RAM ...). Regardless, that wasn't at all the point of what I was saying, nor was it the point of what I was replying to. Microsoft is pricing their console competitively. They're not undercutting Sony (if so, I would've paid $200, not $300 for my XBox this morning), and while they're taking a loss, that's expected and encouraged (seriously, who's going to buy a $500 console? Remember the 3DO? The Neo Geo? ... the economics of the console video game market do not work that way.).


      Incidently, all your contraarguments didn't convince me one bit. But have a nice day nevertheless.

      Didn't convince you to what? To buy an XBox? That wasn't the point of my reply. Apparently I was unable to convince you to stop fear-mongering and knee-jerking, either, and sadly I did fail there -- my reply was designed to debunk your points, one by one. I feel I did a fairly good job of it. If you don't want to believe the market realities of the real world, that's your choice. Meanwhile, I'll be enjoying DOA3 on my new XBox.

    50. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      I'm in Montreal, Canada

    51. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      "Oh look! The gaming industry has lots of money! We can get some of that!"

      Not the best way to make friends.

      The best way for a gaming company to make friends: Be fairly reliable and have the good games. Having a good controller and/or a low price help, too.

      The happy-happy nice-nice stuff is just touchy feely. It's not really what's important as far as the bottom line.

      Remember; People are stupid and lazy. Oh sure, not you, not me, not your neighbors, but we all know (and can see ample evidence) that the majority of Earth's population is pretty goddamn stupid. They LIKE being kicked in the nuts by the industry.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    52. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by haggar · · Score: 1

      Didn't convince you to what? To buy an XBox? That wasn't the point of my reply.
      Very stupid way of putting words in my mouth. No, of course I didn't mean that you were trying to convince me to buy an Xbox. The word "convince" is not exclusively used in that context, you know? But obviously your world seems to be split into two neatly distinct categories: those who do and those who don't buy an Xbox. And you found it relevant to point out that you clearly belong to the former category. I pity you.

      What I meant, and an average english speaking person understands, is that you did not convince me in your argument's validity.

      And since now you gave just more of the same, I stay unconvinced.

      --
      Sigged!
    53. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by Osty · · Score: 2

      But obviously your world seems to be split into two neatly distinct categories: those who do and those who don't buy an Xbox. And you found it relevant to point out that you clearly belong to the former category. I pity you.

      You're right. Everything is either about buying/owning an XBox or not, to me. I reckon time as "BX" and "AX" -- Before XBox and After XBox. I decide what to wear in the morning, what to eat of an evening, and even where to buy gas for my car by an XBox unit of measurement. But seriously, it's a fairly easy distinction to make -- those who did/will buy an XBox, those who are unsure, and those who won't (typically zealots like yourself). As for pitying me, you might want to try out some of the games before you do so. I'd feel bad if you were pitying me for having fun.


      What I meant, and an average english speaking person understands, is that you did not convince me in your argument's validity.

      Convenient. You refused to back-up your fear-mongering in your original post, and yet you have the audacity to question the validity of mine? I'm sorry, please tell me what portions you don't agree are valid (specifics please, not just "all of it"). If you're referring to your conspiracy theory about Microsoft not charging developers the licensing fees to develop for the XBox, I can only say bullshit. Keep dreaming. The proof of such a claim is on you, as you're the one suggesting they're working against the status quo (where that would be charging development licensing fees to make money on video game hardware). As far as pricing goes, you don't have a leg to stand on. The XBox is priced competitively, enough said. It doesn't matter if or how much money Microsoft is losing on it, because (and I've said it before) THAT'S EXPECTED. You lose money on video game consoles. That's the way the market works. Don't believe me? Go talk to Nintendo, Sega, or Sony. They'll tell you.




      And since now you gave just more of the same, I stay unconvinced.

      And obviously this is going to be "more of the same" to you as well. Either you have a comprehension problem, or you're one of the hard-headed zealots that don't want to believe there are valid reasons behind the things that Microsoft does, and can be explained without FUD, fear-mongering, or knee-jerk conspiracy theories. Believe what you will, as I obviously can't make a dent.



      You have an amazing ability to latch onto the most trivial of details, making issues out of what is essentially a non-issue, while ignoring the more important facts and questions that I've brought up. Back up your claim that Microsoft is waiving license fees. Prove that Microsoft's advertising budget is magnitudes larger than Sony's or Nintendo's by providing concrete numbers for those two. Find hard numbers on how much Microsoft is losing per XBox vs how much Sony is losing now (and lost at time of release). Furthermore, justify how charging $299 for the XBox, the same price as the PS2, is somehow an artificially low price, and thus is uncompetitive (assumption made from your statements), even though it's competitve with PS2, and even more expensive than GameCube. But go ahead, latch onto some trivial sentence in this reply, too, and ignore everything else.

    54. Re:why so negative towards xbox? by rtechie · · Score: 1

      You're definitely not imagining things, Slashdot has a well-known unreasoning anti-MS bias. Slashdot posters rarely comment on MS products that are "non-monopolistic" or even innovative like MS's new optical mice or the Sidewinder series of game controllers. Or even WebTV, which is definitely a niche product but it works pretty well.

      I find it ironic that the posters are rooting for Sony and Nintendo which are EVEN MORE RUTHLESS monopolies. The Xbox will have to stand on it's own merits, exceptional marketing, and lots of luck.

      Personally, I think the Xbox is probably doomed. It's doubtful that the market can support 3 different major consoles, look at PS1 vs. N64 vs. Saturn. And Microsoft has essentially already ceded 1/3 of the market (Japan) to PS2 and Gamecube. I strongly suspect that MS will focus almost entirely on the US market, where I suspect MS will see most of their sales. The real battle will be in Europe, How will the XBox fare in the land where Pokemon and Final Fantasy don't completely rule?

      The problem that MS has is that the PS2 and Gamecube DEFINITELY won't fail. The PS2 has a religious following in Japan and has several key franchises like Final Fantasy, Tekken, and Metal Gear Solid. Likewise, the Gamecube is assured the under 15 crowd with Mario, Zelda, and Pokemon franchises.

      I suspect the Xbox will either go the way of the 3D0 and get pulled after a year or so, or the Neo Geo and become a niche product for a certain "core" of gamers. Or they might just abandon the "games only" approach and make it a "convergence box".

  22. Nitpicking. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    XBox's crash screens are Green, not blue. Unless that was a change.

    XBox, Colecovision and 3DO M2 all prove that muscle != success.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    1. Re:Nitpicking. by dudemaster · · Score: 1

      Can't wait to see the XBOX GSOD :-)

      any links yet?

    2. Re:Nitpicking. by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick your nitpicking, but the Colecovision actually did pretty well. Unless you want to re-open the whole Atari 5200 vs. ColecoVision holy war again...

    3. Re:Nitpicking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont forget the Atari Jaguar!

    4. Re:Nitpicking. by tt2k1 · · Score: -1

      And TurboGrafix 16! Grease up the piggy, boys, we're goin' to town!

      --

      Troll Tuesday 2001.

      --The Mess

  23. Linux on xbox by invisik · · Score: 0

    Can you run Linux on it? It's basically a PC, right? Why not. Bill would enjoy knowing it ran Linux.

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
    1. Re:Linux on xbox by abe+ferlman · · Score: 2

      Bill would enjoy knowing it ran Linux.

      Right, because he likes innovation- in fact he recently claimed to have been personally responsible for the rise of open source because of the way dos/windows commoditized hardware. Innovation warms his heart, just like heartburn.

      --
      microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    2. Re:Linux on xbox by Xaxor · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many M$ salespersons would commit suicide if someone infected the X-Box with Linux http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/22770.html Of course, Bill is right in a way. He just lied 75% of the time. If he had said that Linux came about beause he and other thought the standard should be a buggy / crashable / needs-to-be-updated-constantly OS, it would work. Would we need Linux if M$ actually worked harder and was careful in their coding? Probably not. But ehy didn't, so here we are.

      --
      When eveything is outlawed, outlaws will have everything. - Xaxor -
  24. X-Box FUD, No! PS-2 Linux, Yes! by Mentifex · · Score: 1

    Microsoft always spreads fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) well in advance of its lame products, so as to dissuade early adopters from buying a truly excellent product such as Ken Kutaragi's Play Station Two with the Emotion Engine CPU chip. Now that an outside-Japan Linux add-on has been spoken of but not yet offered for sale, it is worthwhile to avoid the probably boring X-Box and wait for an awesome Play Station Two serving as an Internet-ready Linux workstation and DVD-player.

  25. Yboy by crumbz · · Score: 1

    So should I upgrade my PS2 with the optional ethernet/HD? Do I order a new gamecube to play Luigi's Mansion? Do I contribute dollars to fatass Ballmer's checking account? If only we lived under the Taliban we wouldn't have these problems.

    1. Re:Yboy by blank · · Score: 1

      plus, the taliban is getting free food from the sky! some of it gives you lead poisioning though.

      i think it's all about the gamecube. except that i need metal gear, ICO and final fantasy X. x-box, smesh-box. i'll wait to see what my x-box counterparts have to say about it. if they gave me a game i want, i'd get it. even if it's a crappy tekken tag tournament.

      hey, want some food? it comes in a nice yellow canister.

      --

      bah. start over

    2. Re:Yboy by crumbz · · Score: 1

      What I want more than anything is Soul Caliber 2....

  26. The X-box ate my baby! by truffle · · Score: 0, Troll


    And my stuffed dingo too!

    --

    ---
    I support spreading santorum
  27. Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by Master_Ruthless · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's next, Ars Technica's take on national health care?? Tom's Hardware celebrity gossip? If you're going to post a hardware review, you should aim a little higher than the online version of "The Nation". Surely someone that knows what they're talking about has reviewed this product?

    1. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by 32xts · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Slashdot's fashion pages will be next.

      The reviewer is a contributing editor for gameslice apparently, but considering gameslice has had about 10 updates in the past year, I doubt he's working very hard in that respect.

    2. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by instinctdesign · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article? I found it very indepth and well written. The writer definately knew what he was talking about. As a once regular reader (sorry, I like it... but not enough to pay a fee) Salon has often has very good articles about current technology.

      --
      forma3
    3. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by revscat · · Score: 2

      What are you talking about? Salon has made it a staple of their content to deal with technical issues since they started publishing. Salon deals with many different issues, from P2P to penis grabbing to LSD, and they have done most of it extremely well. Just because they do not focus exclusively on technology does not by any stretch of the imagination mean that they cannot write quality reviews of the latest game console.

      Here, read this or this. I think it'll help you see more clearly.

      - Rev.
    4. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by the_great_cornholio · · Score: 1

      This is not a hardware review. Although hardware is discussed, there is no real comparison of the relatieve merits of each console's innards.

      Instead, this is a discussion of the cultural context in which game consoles live, and whether or not Microsoft has the right strategy for penetrating it. Whether or not you agree with the author, that is a reasonable topic for 'the online version of The Nation' (which, incidentally, has a website).

    5. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guy seems more informed than most of the posters here.

    6. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by WWWWolf · · Score: 2
      Slashdot's fashion pages will be next.

      Ah! So that's why there's been articles about wearable computing, chassis mod ideas, and stuff that looks cool...

    7. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      The Xbox isn't "hardware", it's a consumer product.

      The average person doesn't care what the graphics chipset in a game console is, or what the clock speed of the CPU is. They just want to know whether it's FUN.

    8. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next, Ars Technica's take on national health care??

      Uh, maybe. Today they are running about the Red Cross' Liberty Fund...

    9. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by Xenophobe · · Score: 1
      ...than the online version of "The Nation".


      Funny, I thought that this was the online version of "The Nation"...

    10. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by dasunt · · Score: 3, Funny


      Its almost as bad as if Slashdot did movie reviews.


      Er wait...

    11. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by goatman.cx · · Score: 1

      Heh, Slashdot is essentially already a gateway for ThinkGeek's 'Apparel' store, where the fashion and slogans are sub-par in wittiness. Can't tell you how many times I've seen the banner for some stupid 'Free Dmitry' t-shirt.

      --


      ---------
      Fuck you, motherfucker. Fuck yous to: Rob "Taco-Snotter" Malda, Homos, Kowboi Kneel, and RMS.
    12. Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? by jcc · · Score: 1

      The Salon article is not a hardware review. It is a content review, with an eye to creativity, and the realization of new ideas through the hardware. They really didn't comment at all on the hardware.

  28. Penguins crashing through windows.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they ported Linux on the PS2, in theory it should be possible to put it on the X-Box with a few modifications, since it does use an x86 processor. Does anyone have any plans to release an image for it?

    1. Re:Penguins crashing through windows.... by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      X-box IRCC uses an Nvidia chipset. if NVidia sticks to it's tradition of not releasing the specs of the chips, only binary drivers, a port of linux to the X-Box is not a likelly thing to happen.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    2. Re:Penguins crashing through windows.... by SuzanneA · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A port of a GLX enabled X (the 'nvidia' driver) might be difficult, but certainly the plain 'nv' driver should be possible to port (reasonably easily).

      It might not mean a linux port worthy of writing games for, but it would be a linux port. After all, the dreamcast port doesn't support GLX, as far as I know.

      Besides, as has been said many times: X isn't linux :)

    3. Re:Penguins crashing through windows.... by doob · · Score: 1

      Well, one of the advantages of the nVidia chips is that one driver runs all of them, as long as the XBox chip is not radically different the current ones, the binary driver will probably still work anyway.

      Pure conjecture of course.

      --
      In the spoon, there is no Soviet Russia!
  29. Resell Xbox games? by 4444444 · · Score: 2, Troll

    It just accured to me. Will M$ try to stop people from reselling Xbox games like they do when you try to resell thier software? Honest I'm not trolling I am really curious do you think they will try this? Because they won't make any money off of second hand games.

    --

    http://Lenny.com
    4 great justice!
    1. Re:Resell Xbox games? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      HA HA....that would be realy funny.....

      Funcoland finaly gets X-Box games on the shelf for resale.....the next day the company is hit with a law suit for EULA and copyright infringment

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Resell Xbox games? by Warthog9 · · Score: 1

      This is a legitimate question, and one which could make or break the XBox honestly? I mean one of the most popular things to do around here is to go buy a game beat it all the way through then sell it back at a loss and get anoter one. If you can't do this with the XBox it's toast: Heads up MS.

    3. Re:Resell Xbox games? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      Blah --

      That's a given. Sony will attempt to do it with the PS2 as they've already attempted to do with Music (they don't like used CD-shops at all).

      Wish I had some links to articles -- but --

      Sony will be attempting to build some kind of authentication system into some of their games so that invidividual copies only work on a specific PS2.

      Microsoft won't be doing anything new here, we can just assume they'll probably do it and almost certainly be more strict about it.

      Of course -- as much as that annoys me it won't have much effect on me. I don't sell my games and I normally only buy new ones. Still annoying.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    4. Re:Resell Xbox games? by Zog · · Score: 1

      I think the question is not 'will they stop people from selling games', but 'will there be anyone who would take one if they were being given away for free'. But that's just my perspective ;)

    5. Re:Resell Xbox games? by hyoo · · Score: 1

      I think that Microsoft's reason for disallowing you to resell PC software was that it is very easy to copy something and then resell it. That way MS could potentially lose the sale of the product. That seems like a legitimate reason for disallowing software reselling.

      If they did a good job on the copy protection on their discs, then they shouldn't have to worry about things like that. Console games have a fairly strong market for used games and hardware. I'm not even sure if Microsoft can do that since most of the games will end up being 3rd party.

    6. Re:Resell Xbox games? by donutello · · Score: 2

      I don't think the parent post deserves a response but I'll oblige it with one nevertheless because it got modded up to +4.

      Microsoft does not prohibit people from reselling a retail copy of the OS. What it does prohibit people from reselling are the OEM versions of the OS. The OEM versions are sold for a fraction of the cost of the retail version and have a license which prohibits them being used on any computer but the one it was sold on.

      There are no OEM versions of XBox games being sold for a fraction of the cost of retail and hence there will be no restriction.

      Now that won't stop the conspiracy theories on Slashdot but nothing will stop those...

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    7. Re:Resell Xbox games? by LennyDotCom · · Score: 1

      Microsoft does not prohibit people from reselling a retail copy of the OS. What it does prohibit people from reselling are the OEM versions of the OS. The OEM versions are sold for a fraction of the cost of the retail version and have a license which prohibits them being used on any computer but the one it was sold on.

      Sorry but I have to disagree with your statement. M$ will stop you from selling a retail vesion of thier software on ebay quicker then you can imagine. I have had ebay auctions stopped by them myself especialy if the box has been opened.

      --
      http://Lenny.com
    8. Re:Resell Xbox games? by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

      So if your PS2 breaks, you have to buy a new game? Whoo hoo, sign me up :)

    9. Re:Resell Xbox games? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      So if your PS2 breaks, you have to buy a new game?

      Well, that's the current argument against it that Sony is tossing around in their heads-- but then they figure most people won't really mind, since Sony has a really high level of quality control and NOBODY ever went through 2 or 3 of the original Playstations.

      Right?

      *sigh*

      The reason it looks like there are more thn 30 million Playstation owners is because a good portion of those Playstations are sitting in a landfill.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  30. Don't buy MGS 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's shit. Completed it in 4 hours. Fuck that.

  31. Microsoft isn't paying for the music by paranoic · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Once again Micro$oft figures out a way to screw a new group of people. They convinced most of the bands to give them the music for free. The story is here (NYTIMES reg req.). The bands did it for the publicity but guess what, there are no credits and you can replace the music with your own.

  32. I saw only one... by nuxx · · Score: 1

    Last night I went to a local K-Mart to do some shopping. Turns out that although the sales guy said that they had piles (I think his exact words were "tons") of Gamecubes in the back, they only had one single XBox for sale. Some guys who came in right after I did were extremely relieved that I had no interest in the XBox. I guess I should have said that for $50 I'd leave and let them have it. Oh well.

    -Steve

    1. Re:I saw only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're trying to create a buzz for the product. They probably have tons of XBoxes in the back room, and only put one out on display, intending to induce the panic in people that they'll miss their chance. As soon as it sells, you can be sure that another XBox from the back room will replace it, and that too will sit alone, the "last one remaining" until it sells and is replaced...

      Such tactics are pathetic, but they work very well. (Especially during the Commercialism Season. Oops, I mean the Christmas Season..)

    2. Re:I saw only one... by nuxx · · Score: 1

      I think this was their only one. There wasn't any line and they sales guy didn't want people queueing up because there'd just be a bunch of pissed off people beind the first one come midnight.

      -Steve

    3. Re:I saw only one... by MisterPo · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I read that as "the sales guy said that they had piles".

      Ouch :P

      Po

  33. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This guy brings up a great point. He is not trolling, and he hasn't been rated in order to be rated as overrated... remember, you're supposed to mod UNBIASED.

  34. No thanks. by BoarderPhreak · · Score: 2
    Not to be a flamer here, but quite honestly... I'll pass on the "Xbox," thanks.

    If I wanted a PC, I would've bought one. I'd rather have the Playstation, which plays both the new AND old games, DVDs and CDs. It looks cooler, to boot.

    Microsoft sure is spending a LOT of money on advertising though. I keep seeing Xbox commercials (or rather games FOR the Xbox). Judging by the pictures though, I still think the PS2 blows it away.

    1. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you're going to be a flamer no what you do. Look at that hair boy, and those threads!

    2. Re:No thanks. by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      "If I wanted a PC, I would've bought one."

      How are you posting on an Internet site without a PC? WebTV?

    3. Re:No thanks. by BoarderPhreak · · Score: 2
      Macintosh and Sun Ultra60, for starters.

      My Wintel box is an aging dual Pentium "Classic" 166MHz. I haven't booted it in about two years.

    4. Re:No thanks. by nhavar · · Score: 2

      Last I saw XBox would play DVD's and CD's and a little hacking and emulator love and you could play PC, PS1, SNES, SEGA, ATARI, and probably eventually PS2 games on the unit. Sorry but as far as PS2 blowing it away I've yet to any games on the PS2 that are as good as the games I've seen for XBox.

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    5. Re:No thanks. by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 2

      You should fire it up and run SETI@home on it...

    6. Re:No thanks. by _dewman_ · · Score: 1

      The X-Box does not play DVD's out of the box. For another $30 on top of the $300, you can purchase the Xbox DVD Kit, which includes a remote and dvd driver. This is *required* for dvd playback.

    7. Re:No thanks. by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      To be fair, the PS2 has a lot of add-ons requried to get to where the XBox is too. You need a Multi-tap ($25-$35) in order to play with 4 players (whereas XBox has 4 ports natively). 'Course, my multitap has 5 ports, which should come in handy for the next Madden...

      Also, the broadband adaptor will be retailing for ~$40 in the spring, as well as the harddrive (price unknown), both of which the XBox has already. Of course, the PS2's BBA also has a built-in modem, unlike the XBox, which leaves HPBs out in the cold. And the HD is likely to be a 40GB model, unlike the XBox's 8GB HD.

      You can buy a USB ethernet adaptor ($45-$50) for the PS2 right now and play Tony Hawk 3 online (which I would highly reccomend) and you can also use existing USB keyboards and mice with the PS2, while M$ has eschewed the standard USB form factor in order to make you buy more XBox controllers at $40 a pop.

      Making the DVD functionality an additional cost for consumers is actually pretty savvy of M$. Think about it: who controls/produces the majority of the content out there? AOL/Time Warner and Sony. Why giv people an excuse to drop money into the pockets of your competitors?

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  35. At least there's a consolation prize... by Arethan · · Score: 2

    At a bare minimum, this means that we're closer to Halo will shipping for the PC & Mac. I expect they'll start porting it within the next month, if they haven't already started. Of course, they won't release it for at least half a year to a year from now, but it's a start.

    It's pretty sad when I have no interest in the system itself, but find more significance in the software that will become available for other platforms shortly after it's release.

    1. Re:At least there's a consolation prize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's pretty sad you have an interest in a cliche fps that was passe in about 1997. first, halo is never coming out for the PC, mark my words (i might know this too). second, who cares what u think?

  36. Cube by nvembar · · Score: 1


    As a gamer that hearkens from the 2600 days, I am far more excited about the Gamecube than the X-Box. I can't wait to experience Miyamoto's Pikmin, SW:Rogue Squadron II, Perfect Dark, and the next Zelda (I like the 'toon look).


    The problem is that the X-Box stole Halo away from the PC and, more importantly, will have Shenmue II next fall, according to IGN.
    *Sigh* It might warrant making a friend who owns an X-Box.


    Ah, well. Here's hoping my Cube preorder gets shipped early.

    1. Re:Cube by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      Shenmue was a very cool game, yes. But I wouldn't consider a sequel important in the grand scheme of things.

      (assuming "important" games are those that could make someone buy the console to play, or at very least every other person who owned the console would almost assuredly buy. GT3, GTA3 and MGS2 are going to be like that for the PS2, but Halo is the only Important game that MS has for the X-box.)

    2. Re:Cube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just import Shenmou II from the UK. It's still coming out on the DC there.

    3. Re:Cube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er Shenmue. Dangit.

    4. Re:Cube by pauldy · · Score: 1

      Didn't Microsoft "steal" halo away from the Mac users first by purchasing Bungie ,letting them think everything would remain the same then decide they wanted halo on the game cube stalling mac development in favor of the game cube's.

  37. it's all in the games by posmon · · Score: 1
    their main beef seems to be the games lineup. and we all know how shit the playstation 2 had it when that first came out.

    quit your fucking whining.

    --

    update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

    1. Re:it's all in the games by Hnice · · Score: 2

      This is so not the point -- the two consoles are going head up NOW, not a year from now when the XBox might actually have more then ten games.

      But to your point, MS's lineup for *next* year sucks. This time last year, Sony had a shitty lineup, but they had a lot in the works. Where's the MGS2? Where's the Tony Hawk 3? Where's the GTA? Where's the Final Fantasy? The Devil May Cry? The list of games being hyped then was really, really long -- what's Microsoft promising us, aside from ports of PS2 titles and "a next-generation cutting edge high definition bla bla bla marketing bla vapor bla bla resistance futile bla bla" with no specifics?

      --

      god is just pretend.

    2. Re:it's all in the games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, coolguy, before you go /.ing, and running at the mouth before you actually know the facts, go read xbox.ign.com.

      MGS2 - Ported to Xbox, and to quote Hideo "will actually look better/run better due to the hardware being easier to code for"

      FF X - Yeah, thats right, ported to xbox.

      give 'em 6 months and they'll have a THPS3x or something, tha'ts how all consoles do it. Case in point DOA3: DOA2 came out on DC, then DOA2: Hardcore for PS2, now DOA3 for Xbox... give 'em 6 montsh and you'll have DOA3:Hardcore extremem or something for ps2... that's just how it works.

  38. Crashing Nintendo by nuxx · · Score: 1

    I remember when I had Iron Tank for the NES. There's one point where if you take the route to the left the game will ALWAYS lock hard as soon as you drive your tank over a specific point. Not Nintendo's fault of course, but irritating none the less. Especially with no way to patch it.

    -Steve

  39. Networked/Linked Games by BoarderPhreak · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Another thing...

    The Xbox is the only console out there without networking. What's up with that?!

    1. Re:Networked/Linked Games by Nitar · · Score: 1

      The Dreamcast has had networking for years...

    2. Re:Networked/Linked Games by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      "Networking" can be achieved by hooking up multiple xboxs together, and they are going to have internet adapters by summer 2k2 (same page).

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    3. Re:Networked/Linked Games by bonk · · Score: 1

      Umm - I believe one of the features of the x-box is that it comes with a built-in network adapter.

      Of course, I don't follow console wars that much since the demise of the Dreamcast.

      X-box looks nice, somewhat large unit compared to gamecube;s small profile, but the graphics are nice, detailed and crisp (on the football game they had at bestbuy at least)

      The controller is a little un-wieldly, if I were to get an X-box (my little bro wants it for christmas) I would definately buy different brand controllers.

      --
      I hope to die peacefully in my sleep like grandpa, not screaming like his passengers.
    4. Re:Networked/Linked Games by Merlynnus · · Score: 1

      Hello? The Xbox is the only console out there that comes with an ethernet adapter *built-in*!!

      What's up with that?

    5. Re:Networked/Linked Games by bonk · · Score: 1

      Okay, my bad. Must have been mis-informed about the network adapter. Silly donut.

      --
      I hope to die peacefully in my sleep like grandpa, not screaming like his passengers.
    6. Re:Networked/Linked Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it has Ethernet. That fits with most people's conception of networking.

    7. Re:Networked/Linked Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Import the Japanese Xbox controllers. According to people who have seen it, it's considerably smaller and better shaped.

    8. Re:Networked/Linked Games by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Well, that's good for the small percentage of the population that wants to play against other people, and the ever smaller percentage that has high-speed connections at home. For the rest of us who just like good games, it's a big "so what?" Not everything needs to be networked just for the sake of networking.

    9. Re:Networked/Linked Games by tt2k1 · · Score: -1
      Import the Japanese Xbox controllers. According to people who have seen it, it's considerably smaller and better shaped.
      I'd like to import some Japanese women, for the same reasons.
      --

      Troll Tuesday 2001.

      --The Mess

    10. Re:Networked/Linked Games by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I don't get this - I have an xbox sitting right here - and on the back left of the unit (as your looking it it) is a 10/100 ethernet jack...

  40. Xbox HW Problems by Matrix12 · · Score: 1

    All of the Xbox demos I have seen at various Targets (Midwest equivalent of Wal-Mart) have been locked up. Thiw was as of a couple of weeks ago. As an embedded engineer, I have always been surprised at the MTBF (is that metric work for consoles too?) of console systems. The XBox really is just Windoze and a Pentium, with some proprietary hardware thrown in; What does that equation add up to? Of course, Dreamcast was a Super-H + Windows box, and I don't remember it having painfully evident problems.

    .\\12

    1. Re:Xbox HW Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the Xbox demos I have seen at various Targets (Midwest equivalent of Wal-Mart) have been locked up.

      Dude, there are Targets everywhere.

    2. Re:Xbox HW Problems by iainl · · Score: 1

      There was hardly any Windows in the Dreamcast at all; programmers could _choose_ to put a version of WinCE on the disc, if that is how they wanted to put a middleware on their dealings with the hardware, but others bypassed it completely and either wrote or bought a different solution.

      As for the failing X-Boxes, thats been traced to the Halo demo (and possibly others) not correctly recompiling the code for the non-devkit boxes, and so failing when a debug dll call was made (the debug dlls not being on the disc). Bungie fixed it with a quick recompile, and I'd be surprised if the final releases have slipped through QA with this problem. Also, the fancy cabinet design has been blamed for letting some of them overheat, apparently.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:Xbox HW Problems by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, the best games did not run WinCE. They used SEGA's own Dreamcast OS.

    4. Re:Xbox HW Problems by bmajik · · Score: 2

      stop right now with how wrong you are.

      Dreamcast was NOT a windows box. Dammit i wish people would stop talking about shit they are ignorant of.

      Sega and Microsoft made a Windows CE target for the dreamcast hardware, so you could IF YOU WANTED TO, develop your GAME using Windows CE. The Windows CE was _purely_ optional and it was on the GAME DISC, not the console.

      Now, on to xbox:
      No xbox i've ever played or seen has crashed.

      The "green screen of death" picture everyone made such a big deal out of was a developer/debug unit...

      Finally, its a bit different than "Windoze" and a Pentium.

      Saying XBox is Windows + pentium is saying PS1 is an SGI Indigo with gcc. If you're such a brilliant damn embedded engineer, please tell me how microsoft can fit 30 or 100 or whatever it is many MEGABYTES of windows code into the xbox roms ?

      Let's review:
      The XBOX uses a PII based cpu.
      It has 64MB of UMA memory.
      It completely omits the traditional PC northbridge/southbridge/whatever chips for its own purposes.
      It has a GPU that YOU CANNOT BUY FOR A PC.
      It runs a Windows 2000 _derived_ kernel _in rom_.

      As an embedded engineer, you of all people should realize that sticking an x86 family proc in something doesnt' make it any more of a PC than having an R3000 in a playstation makes it a Silicon Graphics machine.

      So please, stop lending your profession to your incorrect analysis. It continues the spread of incorrect information, and it makes you look like a big dumbass.

      (Even more so than all my profanity makes me look like one)

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    5. Re:Xbox HW Problems by otomo_1001 · · Score: 1

      quote:
      Let's review:
      The XBOX uses a PII based cpu.
      It has 64MB of UMA memory.
      It completely omits the traditional PC northbridge/southbridge/whatever chips for its own purposes.
      It has a GPU that YOU CANNOT BUY FOR A PC.
      It runs a Windows 2000 _derived_ kernel _in rom_.
      :quote

      The xbox does have a pII and 64mb of memory. but the hardware stuff is totally off.

      The xbox uses a gf3 for the gpu, hmmm, how'd that gf3 get in my computer? And the motherboard is a nvidia nforce motherboard sans the pci/agp stuff that the xbox doesn't need being a game system. (I believe there is a northbridge on the nforce, remembering the dual channel ddr ram support online, but I could be wrong :P )

      Just thought I'd correct a few glaring errors.

    6. Re:Xbox HW Problems by bmajik · · Score: 2

      no. YOU are wrong.

      The xbox GPU is NOT the GF3 gpu. The XBox GPU has an additional shader unit, and one "other thing", iirc, that the gF3 chipset does not.

      the nForce is not a UMA chipset. XBOX is absolutely a UMA system. thus, i feel 95% confident in saying xbox is not nforce.

      if you want to keep this up, i'll go find links :)

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    7. Re:Xbox HW Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.xbox.no/bilder/maskin/xbox5.jpg

      There is a picture showing inside here .. well .. uhm.. one thing for sure .. IT will get warm inside ..

    8. Re:Xbox HW Problems by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Well - it does say right on the front "powered by Microsoft Windows CE" - thats all I'm going off :).

    9. Re:Xbox HW Problems by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

      Dreamcast has the ability to run a version of Windows CE, but many of the games did not use Windows CE, opting instead to just code the machine down to the metal.

      The way god intended people program consoles.

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  41. Michael, you are extremely immature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Your comments in the story was unnnecessary and one of the most childish and immature things I have seen from you. Your anti-MS bias shines through every time.

    How about trying to stick to the subject at hand? How about talking about the games, the hardware, etc? You instead try to stick it MS wherever you can. You get bitchslapped by readers everytime you say something stupid, but it doesn't seem to stop you from doing it again.

    Supposedly you're an editor, but you use your power to vent every time. Please try to do your job once in awhile.

  42. Get the XBOX Bundles! by Kozz · · Score: 2

    You should have pre-ordered them, but you can still get in line to get your XBox Bundles.

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  43. Wow... CompUSA Can Really Have an X-Box Fest Now by qualera · · Score: 1

    I was in there this weekend and they had over 15 ft of shelf space dedicated to X-Box controllers. Another 5 ft dedicated to their paltry selection of X-box games. No X-Boxes of course (now they can really party!). They had their X-Box demo displayed front row of the store. I thought "well fine, its dumb to waste that much space, but its new"

    Then I noticed they had both their Playstation and Playstation 2 demo machines disabled. WTF? Do you get special discounts from Micro$oft for that? Between that and their checkout monitor video displays and numerous store displays for Windows XP it was just icky.

  44. XboX, WinXP... In the UK know better by opkool · · Score: 5, Funny


    Check this picture


    Or this other one

    More on The Register

    1. Re:XboX, WinXP... In the UK know better by goatman.cx · · Score: 1

      Hmmm..... hmmmm....thinking of ways to gain legitimacy....hmmm. I've got it! Why the answer is obvious! Vandalization of private property! Of course!

      --


      ---------
      Fuck you, motherfucker. Fuck yous to: Rob "Taco-Snotter" Malda, Homos, Kowboi Kneel, and RMS.
    2. Re:XboX, WinXP... In the UK know better by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      They make it sound like the xbox was just pulled out of their ass - as I recall MS has been working on this project seriously for the last 2~3 years. How long did it take to develope the PS2?

  45. Hard drive? by NineNine · · Score: 1

    I still can't, for the life of me, figure out why a game console would have a hard drive. That just says "complexity" to me. Something I definately DON'T want from a game console. Game consoles are designed to be played after smoking a bowl and curing up in front of the TV with a bunch of munchies. Besides, hard drives fail. They fail on a regular basis. What happens when the hard drive fails ina game console? I think I'll stick with my PS2. I'm very, very happy with it.

    1. Re:Hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard Drives fer Linux,innit dumbass?

    2. Re:Hard drive? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      So, are you saying that they designed this so that the legions and legions of Linux people [note sarcasm] would buy the XBox so that they'll have yet another shitty little overpriced PC to install Linux on? That doesn't make any sense.

    3. Re:Hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously tho. linux on xbox would be seriously ironic. otherwise i cant think of a reason to have a HD either..
      you wonderful person, you ;)

    4. Re:Hard drive? by demon · · Score: 1

      Well, it is running Windows 2000 (a stripped-down version of it) - you have to be able to get service packs, right? :)

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    5. Re:Hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Lets think about this for a second. Have you read about the HD for the PS2? The XBOX is trying to be a game system, while the PS2 is trying to be a computer. Monitors, HD's, mice, keboards, AOL, Netscape, please..., Besides, the HD for the XBOX is pretty much invisiable to the user, its used as a swap space (hence only 8 gigs) ripping MP3's, d/l updates (those r dumb)and saving games

    6. Re:Hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree If i wanted a hard drive, ethernet, etc. i'd buy another PC, with my game consoles i just want a controller and the box and the game, nothing more, thats less hardware failure and less headache.

    7. Re:Hard drive? by perlyking · · Score: 1

      Regarding the hard drive, does this mean the console has to be shut down rather than just switched off.
      Does anyone know, i'm curious.

      --
      no sig.
  46. Oh the drama!! by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    So, for all you poor souls who lined up to give money to the borg: does it work? Any blue-screens yet?

    Can we be more dramatic??
    A bit biased?

    How about you give the world a day or two with it before we start condemning it, k?
    And don't give me that "It crashed in the demos", cause when I worked for a software store when the DC came out, it crashed plenty (and the local stores didn't have any problems).

    I'm going to give MS a fair chance, like a good un-biased person :-P

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Oh the drama!! by Faw · · Score: 1

      Can we be more dramatic??
      A bit biased?

      I agree that the comment was unnecesary, but what do you expect here.

      Anyway is funny that you mention the Dreamcast as another console that crashed, because Sega used a customized Windows CE for the it. :)

    2. Re:Oh the drama!! by Redline · · Score: 1

      when I worked for a software store when the DC came out, it crashed plenty

      That can also be directly blamed on Microsoft, since DC games ran on a "special" version of Windows CE.

    3. Re:Oh the drama!! by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      No it can't. It was the hardware overheating (the venting in those demo boxes were atrocious).

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    4. Re:Oh the drama!! by liposuction · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. well at least he had an opinion. Not like you, Mr. "I'm-all-warm-and-loving-and-have-no-opinion-becau se-I-might-piss-someone-off"

      Get a spine. Even the likes of you know better than to trust someone like "monkey-boy".

      Otherwise you're on the wrong site. Go to teamxbox.com or something.

      --
      "Thoughts are more powerful than any weapon, and I don't even let my people own guns." --Joseph Stalin
  47. PlayStation 2 is yesterdays news by Western+Light · · Score: 1

    I've never heard so much moaning about competition. There's an article on The Register where Kunitake Ando of Sony pretty much admits XBox dusts PS2 and that Sony is already (reluctantly) looking into PS3. Here is Japan the feeling is that the Japanese own the console gaming industry and that U.S. software (and hardware) companies are lame, lame, lame, and just don't get it. Of course, they said the same thing about Korean LCD makers a year before Samsung and friends took over the LCD industry (previously dominated by the Japanese). At least the X-box gives the U.S. software gaming industry new impetus for some fresh gaming start-ups. Why cede the gaming industry to Japan?

  48. X-Box second edition to be released in March by parliboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Redmond, WA) - Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft, today announced a launch date for a second edition of the X-Box. At a press conference today, Mr. Gates described the intentions of his company in developing the Second Edition of X-Box. "The system, nicknamed 'Box the Second', or 'BS', will carry console gaming into new heights, and continue to develop the synergy that grows between computing and consoles." When pressed for specs, Mr. Gates gave a list of specifications that almost exactly matched that of the original X-Box. Except for one difference: "This one is purple."

    --
    "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
  49. Can you install linux on it ? by bug1 · · Score: 1

    If so, ill give $1 to the first distro to supports the xbox arch.

    1. Re:Can you install linux on it ? by rootmonkey · · Score: 1

      Isn't the xbox arch x86? So I think you owe Linus a dollar.

      --

      Yes but every time I try to see it your way, I get a headache.
    2. Re:Can you install linux on it ? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > If so, ill give $1 to the first distro to supports the xbox arch.

      $1? Ooooo! I'll get our team working on it right away!

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    3. Re:Can you install linux on it ? by Chakat · · Score: 1
      Isn't the xbox arch x86? So I think you owe Linus a dollar.

      Nope, the poster gets to keep the dollar for a bit longer. From all the reports I've heard, the XBox has some fairly nasty protection routines to ensure that MS gets their cut from any software run on the XBox. Before anyone can think about porting Linux, which will be admittedly fairly easy, one has to first circumvent the protection routines, which means stepping through the minefield which is the DMCA.

      Still, it'll probably be done eventually. They've gotten Linux on a Playstation, and IIRC, an N64. Getting it on an XBox ought to be trivial.

      --

      If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

    4. Re:Can you install linux on it ? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      They've gotten Linux on a Playstation

      Only because sony made it - with their super secret proprietary programming information...

      It would be really cool if MS made a Linux distro for it though :).

    5. Re:Can you install linux on it ? by Chakat · · Score: 1

      No, I'm talking about a completely independant port of Linux to the original Playstation put out by Ru.nix. Sony had nothing to do with this project whatsoever, except build the hardware.

      --

      If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

  50. YES! by Nerftoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where he creates these boxes that sit on your TV and take over your thoughts?

    That neon green Xbox logo sends out microwave pulsations to your brain to the beat of the Madonna song played on the WinXP commercials. Mysteriously, on our next visit to Best Buy, you pick up a copy of WinXP:

    Wife: Honey, I thought you only ran Linux?
    You: Microsoft for life, babe.

    1. Re:YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, not a troll. Actually, I would have modded it up as funny if I had any points left.

    2. Re:YES! by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

      It's funny...not a troll...stupid moderators.

      --
      Derek Greene
  51. The true potential for the XBOX by Lord_Pall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    is the hardware itself..

    The launch titles suck.. Rehashed fighting/racing/whatever games.. extreme sports, extreme driving, extreme first person shooters with a console controller..blech..

    But what we've got is a pc.. Fast as hell nvidia chipset, hardrive, network card, dvd drive..

    Tell me someone isn't going to turn that into some cool as hell hardware.. slap a bigger hardrive into, make an mp3 box.. slap an even bigger hardrive into it, turn it into a pvr..

    Take it even further.. turn it into the convergence device people have been talking about for the past 10 years.. Except instead of paying 999.99 for it, buy it for 299 (or less when the price drops)..

    I think as a piece of hardware its got great potential...

    As a console.. well its motsos.. (More of the same old s..t)

    lastly.. for your truly rabid anti-ms people..

    The XBOX represents the only true way you can DIRECTLY damage microsoft through buying things.. Every unit they sell is sold at a loss.. Buy one.. Hack the hardware.. make it do stuff its not supposed to do.. And don't buy any software for it :)

    Okay maybe the logic's a little spurious.. But it sounds good on paper :)

    1. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by baptiste · · Score: 2
      I'm with you - while MS makes my skin crawl, its a decent box for the price which I expect will drop. Anyone up for starting www.hackxbox.org? :) If this thing can be hacked so it'll run linux - that would be fun! Thats why Tivo's are so much fun! Of course, my only beef is the thing is HUGE. Box is an understatement. :)

      But I look forward to hearing folks stories of hack attempts - it could bath new life into the Xbox :)

    2. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well how about since it's a pc someone hack out a way to play the games on a pc. Even better, make an emulator for linux. Then head over to funcoland, buy the used games cheam and play XBox games on a Linux machine... I think that would be funny. I refuse to give M$ any money. I'm using linux and am anxiously awaiting my first mac. (TiBook 667 with 1gig RAM :-) )

    3. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by Autumnmist · · Score: 1
      In last month's issue of Wired magazine, the (article on Flextronics, the company that's manufacturing the X-Box for MS, had a quote saying that MS intends to drop the price to $100 as soon as possible. I'll take a 700MHz computer for $100 any time.

      "....The Xbox will sell for $299 at retail - losing as much as $110 on every box sold - and Allard wants to get the retail price to $100 as quickly as possible."

      I think the X-Box chipset is nvidia 2.5 (not sure on the number) I read something like, the GeForce3 was 2.0, and X-box is 2.5...

      Since the X-Box is a PC, how long is it going to take before we can run all those NES, SNES, N64, PS, PS2 emulators currently found online on our X-Boxes? I don't know much about this, but it seems to me that since the X-Box is really just a PC, it has a harddrive, a built-in ethernet/broadband adapter (note: Gamecube has one as an additional purchase only), it has a real Intel processor, and a real NVidia graphics card, then it can be hacked and it can be programmed to run programs emulating ALL the other consoles and the games that run on them.

      Now THAT would be cool.

      --
      --- "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Ben Kenobi, 'Return of the Jedi'
    4. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The XBOX represents the only true way you can DIRECTLY damage microsoft through buying things.. Every unit they sell is sold at a loss.. Buy one.. Hack the hardware.. make it do stuff its not supposed to do.. And don't buy any software for it :)

      Your logic is flawed. Which is of more use to Microsoft, a big pile of unsold Xboxen, or the cash equivalent? They lose -more- money if they have to scrap them.

      As for hacking, hasn't the message got through yet?

    5. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by jmike · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that they've already manufactured all of the boxes they plan to sell.

      $100 loss per item * 100,000 (total sales) > $200 loss per item * 10,000 (initial run).

    6. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by Salsaman · · Score: 1
      The logic is only flawed if you assume that an unsold (to you) Xbox will be scrapped.

      If you assume that MS makes only enough Xboxen to meet demand then the logic is correct.

    7. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by Fizgig · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe the XBox will only boot off of media they have crytographically signed. Thus, you won't be creating and MP3 box or a PVR or any kind of convergence device without their permission (you sure won't be booting Linux) .

    8. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by aspillai · · Score: 1

      I can build a cheap computer to play MP3's for maybe 250. It does nothing else mind you. And why the heck would I use a computer as a DVD player? I have a family. I work on the computer when my family wants to watch movies. I'm not going to stop working so they can watch movies. Ditto with music.

      Seriously, I know of very few people who're seriously interested in having a computer in the living room to do everything. Most people like dedicated hardware that can communicate with each other. (That's where blue tooth/802.11 come it)

      Me.

    9. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10GB HD, 733 P3, 64MB RAM

      Hardly worth paying $999 for. That looks like pretty dismal hardware to me. Why would you even consider building a PC with specs like that, it would be garbage.

      I really doubt Microsoft is loosing tons and tons of money on this. I'd rather own a PC to do PC stuff with then use the XBox too.

    10. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The XBox gets one more pixel shader and one more vertex shader. Otherwise, the GeForce 3 in your PC and the XBox's graphics are the same.

    11. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then you can choose between a GeForce3 for $300 or a GeForce3 + Computer for $300.

    12. Re:The true potential for the XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they will lower the price and sell them at an even greater loss to get rid of them.

  52. I suspect it will be luke warm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's not going to belly up straight away but it's not going to become the new PS2.


    Really what I'm expecting to happen here in the end is the "elite gamers" who know the specs of the hardware and somehow expect that to translate in to better games are going to be shocked when the cube runs wild over them with the least amount of power and must have games (aimed at kids.. no less)


    Xboox specs well but the medium is to the point where you're not going to see night and day differences on TVs between PS2 graphics and xbox (1080i might be a different story though) and it's going to come down to game play and they're the new company.

  53. This is uncalled for. by StarbuckZero · · Score: 1

    So, for all you poor souls who lined up to give money to the borg: does it work? Any blue-screens yet?

    Yeah I don't like MS and I been a Linux user for 2 years not, but that don't mean I'm not going to go out and bash them left and right. Hell try out the Xbox and see if you like it. I don't like the price and the feel of most games because it's to PC like, but on the other hand I do like the joystick. When it comes to a game console it all comes down to is the games. Not what companies release the game console. Even though I would want Microsoft to get a hold the console market.

    --
    From Zero to Hero... Starbuck Zero
  54. Taking money from MS by A+Commentor · · Score: 2
    So, for all you poor souls who lined up to give money to the borg: does it work?

    But since MS is losing money on each unit sold, (at least it was reported that they are losing money per unit), isn't this like taking money from MS? ;-)
    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    1. Re:Taking money from MS by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1

      If I'm guessing right M$ insn't making money on the XBOX but only on the games/licensing/etc. for it?
      YES !! This is where they went wrong !
      So when buying a XBOX you're taking bill's bills.
      OK Every geek outthere: buy a XBOX without any games and throw it away/burn it/kick it or crush it.
      We could have M$ broke in a couple of weeks.

    2. Re:Taking money from MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't think i've ever read a more idiotic comment on slashdot...wait, let me think, nope, this is it.

    3. Re:Taking money from MS by MasteroftheVoxel · · Score: 1

      This won't work...
      If we all go out and buy Xboxes, MS will be
      able to go to game developers and say "look
      how many units we've sold! Don't you want to
      be able to develop for such a large audience?"

      MS will end up with more developers licensing to
      develop for the Xbox and MS will make money. Its the game developers that lose out when then don't
      sell any games.

    4. Re:Taking money from MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break! Lets to do the simple math.

      cost: $500

      price: $400

      if you don't buy one they loose $500 dollars if you do buy one they only loose $100 dollars. Dial a fucking clue.

  55. Who will be first to hack? by cppgodjavademigod · · Score: 1

    I know it's just a matter of a few weeks before someone has linux running on it and the disk upgraded to 60GB.

    1. Re:Who will be first to hack? by cppgodjavademigod · · Score: 1

      BTW - I would buy one to run Linux on, but not to play games.

  56. No more BSOD by denzo · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Microsoft has actually done something to guarantee against getting a Blue Screen of Death on their XBox systems.

    It's now the Green Screen of Death. :P

    1. Re:No more BSOD by Keith+Russell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Um, why has an unqualified picture of an XBox Development Kit* message box been promoted to front page news? All we can glean from this is that the "oct" in the URL implies that it was posted to HardOCP in October. There's no evidence that this is from a unit sold to a consumer. Nor is there evidence that this is from a crashing in-store demo kiosk.**

      Michael, this is neither funny nor professional. You're doing more to reinforce Slashdot's reputation as a childish, "M$ sux0rs linux 0wnz j00" site than any hundred Anonymous Cowards.

      I've almost never agreed with Jon Katz's editorials. But I've always felt that squelching his opinion by banning him from my front page was wrong. You, Michael, have crossed that line. I'm banning you from my front page. I know that will cut my story count in half, but at least I can read the front page with the resonable expectation that I won't have my intelligence insulted.

      *: That's the XDK in "XDK Launcher".
      **: Sorry 'bout the annoying pop-unders, but that's the only crashing demo reference I could find through HardOCP on short notice.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:No more BSOD by SilentChris · · Score: 3, Informative
      "Um, why has an unqualified picture of an XBox Development Kit* message box been promoted to front page news?"

      Mod the man up. I just pointed out the mistake to Michael (the poster of the story) now.

      That's an XDK tossing up an error several months ago. And it's not a crash: it's looking for the media.

    3. Re:No more BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      here, here. I would argue the Michael has been a bigger detriment to slashdot than Jon Katz ever tried to be. Michael is really the worse editor here, always promoting stories to fit into his anti-ms agenda.

      And don't forget his incredible YRO articles too. Who can forget classics like "US Trashes Civil Liberties" or "XXXXX is censoring you"?

      To learn everything you need to know about how hypocritical and vindicative Michael Sims really is, this essay will tell all you need to know.

    4. Re:No more BSOD by filmcritic · · Score: 0

      I find it amusing that links to those pics are being posted on the xbox's launch day. Didn't anyone tell those folks that those are ancient and on a development/debug type of box? Plus all the issues of the demo kiosks crashing were all related to bad code on the demo disks playing on a final console?? Gee whiz, get over the kiddie crap and get the facts straight.

    5. Re:No more BSOD by szcx · · Score: 2
      It's FUD, pure and simple.

      Hypocrites like Michael are pretty quick to accuse Microsoft of using it, but as demonstrated above, they have no qualms about using it themselves.

      Tell us again how Linux has the moral high-ground, Michael.

    6. Re:No more BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jesus christ guys - lighten the fuck up.

    7. Re:No more BSOD by garrettdm · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was in an Electronics Boutique about two weeks ago attempting to play with the demo unit when it completely locked up. When I hit the reset button (which is quite prominently placed on the front of the kiosk) I got an error quite similar to the one shown on HardOCP. My friends andI had quite a laugh, and left without wanting to buy an XBOX. It is NOT an urban myth.

      --
      Never attribute to malice that which can be more easily attributed to stupidity -- Hanlon's Razor
    8. Re:No more BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get of your high horses Keith Russel.
      Who *CARES* if you ban Michael from your frontpage ? If you don't like his humor or his stories, ban him if you want but just do so in *silence*.

      FYI, some of us like what he has to say and want to hear more: It's called Free speech.

      And if you don't like it, go suck some more on bill gates's balls... You pompous clown.

  57. Indrema by n-tone · · Score: 1

    I think that our approach, as compared to some of the other console manufacturers, is to invite creative independence to come to the platform and really do some magic. To steal from film industry examples, I want 'Run Lola Run' . . . [and] 'The Blair Witch Project.' I want those types of zany things that don't really fit into the mold to find their way into Xbox.
    It sounds like the strategy Indrema, the first linux-based console. Indrema is now dead ...

  58. Come on by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    While GTA3 is a pretty impressive game, really how long can it carry a system for? I've never actually played it but merely read reviews, but it seems like the kind of game that would get tiring really quickly (i.e. I've read the AI players aren't AI at all: They're on rails doing the exact same thing every time. Coming from games like F1 2000 CS I would find that unbearable).

    This situation really is a riot because technically the Xbox absolutely stomps the PS2 (and it demolishes the Nintendo. Despite the ramblings that they are "equal" on the Salon article, the reality is that graphics power is 95% of a game machine, and the graphics power in the Xbox brutalizes the Nintendo. That's ignoring the 3d audio processors, etc.) so it's just a matter of killer games (and some reviews have been falling overthemselves to proclaim Halo the best game ever, so perhaps it already has one). Now wait just one minute...where was that last time I heard that argument? Why it was with the PS/2 launch! For those with selective memories, the PS/2 launched with a pile of shit games, and only recently got a "killer game" by way of GTA3.

    1. Re:Come on by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      the reality is that graphics power is 95% of a game machine

      if I am buying a console today, I would hopr it would be 110% of a gaming machine since that is why I am buying the damn thing.....I think the grafics in the PS2 stomp the graphics in a gaming PC with the GF3. games run smooth on PS2, the look good and there is little hastle using the controler.....Halo's controls suck...MS should have taken some Ideas from the snes and golden eye.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to understand the dilemma of a computer game developr. They have to aim at the guts of the market in terms of graphics performance, which probably is around the GeForce/Radeon level. If they developed with GeForce 3 base level performance in mind, then it's likely pc games will look better than PS2 graphics, but they will have limited their market share by a significant amount.

    3. Re:Come on by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if I am buying a console today, I would hopr it would be 110% of a gaming machine since that is why I am buying the damn thing

      Well you do need power for other things like putting real AI in drivers in GTA4.

      I think the grafics in the PS2 stomp the graphics in a gaming PC with the GF3. games run smooth on PS2, the look good

      I respectfully disagree. What resolution does the PS2 normally run at when connected to a TV? I know that lots of people foolishly compare a console game running a 512x384 or whatever with a PC running at 1024x768, ignoring the fact that the PC is pushing >4x as many pixels. In any case I have yet to see a stunning game on the PS2, whereas on a GF3 running at high rez something like Quake 3 (yup it still rocks with every feature turned on) roxxors. Operation Flashpoint offers graphics, AI and features that consoles can only dream of.

    4. Re:Come on by Scooter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      hmm yeah - I played GTA3 a couple of times on a friends PS2 and whilst it was very very beatiful, inclusing reflections of the secnery in the gleaming paintwork (and I could elect to drive my actual real life car which was kinda wierd)at the end of the graphical amazement, it left me cold - basically - it is *nothing* like driving a car. It may have been a different story with a wheel to steer with rather than that funny joystick thing, but I I'm not prepared to spend the £250 to find out :)

      We played some other PS2 titles (which I forget the name of, although one was a Sar Wars title) and I came away thinking "hmm so basically, scenery of one type or another scrolls towards you, and you steer" This seemed the basic premise of most of the games. In some you could shoot things as well, whilst others you just avoided obstacles (snowboarding was one excuse). The annoying thing that all these games had in common, is that you are never *really* in control of your ship/board/car/shopping trolley etc as the game will just not let you move outside of the "approved" area of the scenery. For example, I couldn't fly out of the canyon in the SW game. But there was no apparent reason for this, it was just arbitrary.

      The only other basic type involved 2 psuedo 3d avatarsviewed in 3rd person who face off in some osrt of kickboxing fight. The game appeared to be won by pressing everything on the controller at the same time rapidly.

      Apparentley, GT3 is hailed as one of the best if not the best console game. Hmm well if a very pretty version of "horace goes skiing" is the state of the art, I'll stick to me PC this time around. With games like Star Wars Galaxies and Planetside from Sony coing next year, it's gonna be a blast.

      Before I get flamed by all the console lovers, I should state that I fully recognise that the console has a place - it's damm sight cheaper than a PC for start (My video card cost more than a PS/2), and is more easily accesible by non "hardcore" gamers who just want a bit of a laff with their mates round the TV with the aforementioned beer and pizza, and not to have to spend the first few days of playing any new game, writing macros and message binds, and downloading the essential addons and extra maps you need to play in the "big league" - in many ways, the very flexibility offered by the PC as a games platform provides many more potential ways to cheat. And cheating is what ruins many an online multiplayer gaming experience - just ask any Counterstrike player. These games are effectivley being driven onto the private LAN tournament scene where inspections of the players kit whilst in play are possible leaving just the casual games on the 'net. Serious tournaments are almost impossible on the Internet because of the cheating opportunities available by simply hacking the models or game client. These client mods are undetectable by the server. So, with the "closed" nature of console games (ie you can't write your own config scripts or alter the models, sounds and textures ) perhaps there will be a resurgence of serious Internet based multiplayer play. That is, until the consoles start to look so much like a PC that they suffer the same fate...

      OK the ramble factor has reached the "shut up now scoot" stage so I'll not bore oyu any more :)

    5. Re:Come on by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      well we will just have to hook up a PS2 to an HDTV and set the rest to the highest possable allowed by the TV so we can get a fair compairison....anyone got $2000?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:Come on by nealbutler · · Score: 1
      It's not just down to killer games....it's also down to the promise of killer games. Which the PS/2 had. Plus, it already had a shedload of killer games, as the PS/2 is backwards compatible with the PSX/PSOne.

      nb

      --
      MS: ALL YOUR .BASE ARE BELONG TO US
    7. Re:Come on by tt2k1 · · Score: -1
      GTA3 isn't the only kick-ass game for PS2. Devil May Cry, Onimusha Warlord, Silent Hill 2, Soul Calibur 2, Ico, and, of course, MGS2 are all awesome. True, the PS2 was weak at launch, but most of us didn't care, because we couldn't buy one. :-)

      (Actually, I was able to get a PS2 off of eBay rather early on, and I just played PSX games for a month or so. This speaks well of the strength of the PSX platform -- the first game that I purchased for my PS2 was FFIX, a PSX game!)

      Anyway, I'm not saying that the PS2 is perfect, but GTA3 far from carries the platform. Onimusha, Ico, and Devil May Cry have all been lauded as amazing games by the reviewers who count. Now, with GTA3, MGS2, and GT3, the PS2 will have six blockbuster games by Xmas. Halo may be worth one of those games, but not two, and no where close to five. By the time that Xbox has three or four decent games, FFX will be out (hell yeah!) and Sony will start circulating launch date rumours for the PS3.

      --

      Troll Tuesday 2001.

      --The Mess

    8. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "While GTA3 is a pretty impressive game, really how long can it carry a system for?"

      Geez, anybody ever heard of Gran Turismo 3, Metal Gear Solid 2, SSX, Tony Hawk PS, Devil May Cry, ...

      "This situation really is a riot because technically the Xbox absolutely stomps the PS2"

      You might say that Halo is the greatest thing since bread, but the XBox doesn't have any other games (besides Halo) that are better than any of the above games I mentioned. And howcome if the XBox is sooooo superior, why is Project Gotham so inferior to GT3 (including graphics)?

      Also, as any AMD freak would know, it's not always about MHz. Geez, the last system I can think of with 32 bit CPU before XBox was PS1!! I can assure you that the Gamecube and PS2 are quite capable of producing graphics on par with XBox.

    9. Re:Come on by tt2k1 · · Score: -1
      GTA3 isn't supposed to be a driving simulator, so I think it's a bit unfair to judge it on those merits. I've had it for about three weeks, and only recently have I gotten bored (because the missions have gotten rather difficult). The more that you play, you get more variety and better toys. The second island is loaded with Ferraris and rocket launchers. :-) Is it realistic? Not really. But that isn't the point.

      The game does have its faults, of course. My primary complaint is that it froze my PS2 once, and has suffered odd graphical glitches on two other occasions. (I've never seen a game crash a PS2 before.) In terms of gameplay, I think that the police are too omnipotent once you get past four "wanted" stars, and I didn't like the indestructable truck on the "retrieve evidence" mission -- all of the other "destruction" missions allow you the choice of either using your vehicle (both battering and flipping) or weapons to demolish the target, but that damn truck was able to flip itself over and drive away from a crash!

      I mostly agree with your comments re: PC gaming, but I'll add that one thing I like about console gaming is the lack of pseudo-sports bullshit. I think the lamest thing possible, even lamer than riceboy Civics, is how these teenage CS players form "clans" and start talking in sports terminology about having "scrimmages" and such. This is a mental defect found amongst all FPS games, from Doom to Tribes 2, and I find it disgusting.

      And there's the age-old observation that different platforms are suited to different types of games. PCs rule the FPS and RTS worlds, while consoles rule the action and RPG (don't argue, just agree that the last decent computer-based RPG was Nethack) worlds.

      --

      Troll Tuesday 2001.

      --The Mess

    10. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gran Tourismo 3 (I assume you aren't referring to Grand Theft Auto 3 ;)) is probably the best simulation/racing game we'll have for a few years until GT4 comes out. It is a very well done game/simulation. Of course the PS2 has loads of other great games from Namco, Capcom, Sega, and Konami (I bet Metal Gear Solid 2 will outsell all the xbox games combined).

      The Xbox generally isn't really more powerful than the GC/PS2. If you absolutly require something like completely accurate environmentally mapped sweat on a player's face then the Xbox has a pretty big lead due to the GeForce3 shaders, but the truth is you can fake environment map that and 99% of the gamers who try to tell the difference won't be able to. if you take away the shaders the GC actually is slightly more powerful! Case in point: we had one of our recently released games running on a big screen at our office and one of the memebers of the team asked if it was the xbox version. It wasn't, it was the PS2 version of that game!

      Despite all the shaders (which the xbox version used for extra realisim like the sweat example) vs insane 48gig/sec bandwidth vs awsome low latency 1T SDRAM in the end one of the members of that team who had been working on the game for a year already couldn't tell the difference between the versions! I'm sure if he had waited and looked for the little details he'd have figured it out, but if that's the case, are those details worth anything to the game? It really doesn't matter if you could get 10% more triangles in your meshes with the xbox vs the other consoles, it'll still be the same game!

      The xbox is probably overall the most powerful console this generation due to its shaders and the most generalized/easy to enable anti-aliasing, but its a MUCH smaller lead than the Neo Geo had over the SNES/Genesis/TG16 because the GC beats the xbox for just about everything that doesn't require shaders and the PS2, when optimized correctly (which is a really pain in the butt!), can absolutly fly with that 2560bit wide embedded DRAM.

      The xbox has slightly better graphics than the other cosnoles, but IMHO the worst controller (although the GC controller is pretty contriversial...). If you think slightly better technology is going to count for anything then I sugest you find somebody who bought a beta tape system and ask how much they like that now compared to VHS...

      With the PS2 right now you can play Gran Tourismo 3, Metal Gear Solid 2 (very soon), and probably a dozen other good games from the studios that make the best games (Capcom, Namco, Sega, Konami) and have track records of producing the number one games. WIth the GC you may not get all those games unless it sells really well, but atleast you know it'll have Nintendo's *fun* games. With the xbox you've got a ton of developers with track records of producing mostly bad clones that you'd never buy if the number one develoeprs wrote for your system.

      Remember that, the technology is only as useful as the what it enables. Unless Halo is your dream game take a long look at the developers and ask yourself if they'll be making games that'll be fun you want to play or if they'll be lousy games, but with 10% more vertexes per character before you spend $300 on the xbox.

    11. Re:Come on by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Geez, anybody ever heard of Gran Turismo 3

      Like the other guy I mistakingly have been using the acronym GTA3 (always wondered what the 'A' was for...) for Gran Tourismo 3. It's GT3 that seems to be the killer PS2 game.

      You might say that Halo is the greatest thing since bread, but the XBox doesn't have any other games (besides Halo) that are better than any of the above games I mentioned. And howcome if the XBox is sooooo superior, why is Project Gotham so inferior to GT3 (including graphics)?

      I'm not saying that Halo is the best game: I've never played it, nor seen it in real life. However regardless there have always been games that manage to look like crap and make a platform look underwhelming (see most of the early PS2 games) so I don't think a sample of a genre that is done better on the PS2 really is relevant at this point. Give it 8 months.

      Also, as any AMD freak would know, it's not always about MHz. Geez, the last system I can think of with 32 bit CPU before XBox was PS1!! I can assure you that the Gamecube and PS2 are quite capable of producing graphics on par with XBox.

      Most claims of "64-bit processors" in the gaming world would be absolutely laughed at in the computer world, because usually they're bogus. "I have a 32-bit video processor, and a 32-bit CPU, so it's a 64-bit system!". Anyways I totally and absolutely agree that Mhz means next to nothing, but it's metrics like "lit, transformed polygons rendered per second" that matter, and it's in that realm that the Xbox is many factors higher than the other systems.

    12. Re:Come on by jooniqzb1tch · · Score: 0, Troll

      you must be kidding - how can you even TRY to compare the crappy resolution output of the PS2 with a geforce3 hooked to a computer monitor ?

      I'd say PS2 games on a good tv look as nice as 3+ years old pc games *at best*

      of course the visual aspect is just one thing, playability is another ..

    13. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GTA3 is Grand Theft Auto 3, not Gran Tourismo 3.

    14. Re:Come on by Spunkee · · Score: 1

      Console developers also get to use lower level APIs. PC developers almost have to use OpenGL or DirectX. If one were able to code directly to a GF3's hardware, and they had a minimal OS on top of it, things would be a lot different.

    15. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up, not down, you clueless gay sheeps !

  59. The console wars... by GuntherAEPi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sony seems to think the xbox is going to force them to abandon PS2 sooner than they anticipated....and roll out the PS3...check it out here.

    Full Story

    --GuntherAEPi
    "

    1. Re:The console wars... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I don't get that article - doesn't normally take 2~3 years to develope a game console?

      Sony and co are kinda funny - you know the PS2 has been out for two years now (if you include the japanese release date) - yet they just sat around. Personally with that kind of a lead on your competition you'd think they would have owned the market by now.

    2. Re:The console wars... by newbiescum · · Score: 1

      20 million consoles versus 300,000 units....hmmm...Or if you look at launch dates, PS2 had over 500,000 units sale on their launch date. X-Box has a total of 300,000 units *available* by the latest estimates (granted, I expect them to be sold out too but that's 5:3 ratio on launch day and PS2 didn't even have good games while X-Box is showing their 'best' stuff now). What's to say that Sony isn't owning X-Box?

      Sony doesn't have to do anything for this console war, and they know it. They've already won just be the sheer hype of PS2 and the ensuing 2 years of good economic times. MS faces an uphill battle against an entrenched incumbant who already exceeds most sales estimates that finanical analysts are predicting for its product in its lifetime.

      BTW, MS isn't aiming t win this console war. They're aiming to win the next one by building up fans for this generation.

    3. Re:The console wars... by GuntherAEPi · · Score: 1

      In all honesty, nothing can be judged as far as who's gonna win the console wars at this point....we are simply in the posturing phase....yes...microsoft has a hole to dig out of at this point but it's far from over. Up until now Sony's games have been lackluster, but MGS2 and GT3 and GTA3 are all looking VERY good. They have the advantage of having a strong installed user base and a loyal following from the last round of the console wars, but to put it plainly that doesn't mean squat. The PS2 is not as powerful as the Gamecube or the XBox. Price drops haven't happened, there is still a large portion of the population that is not in the market for a $300 console. That's where Nintendo's advantage starts to creep up. Their price is appealing to a much wider audience and they also have a strong following. Their system is more powerful than the PS2 and they have a strong history of solid in-house games. Their biggest detractors maybe the lack of DVD support and their tendancy to produce more "kiddie-friendly" games (no, i'm not overlooking Bond and Perfect Dark, but if you look at their typical games they are quite often very child-friendly). Nintendo is also very stubborn in it's business model and may not be ready to adapt to a changing landscape of Video-Game players. Microsoft is clearly not the "evil-empire" of video-games. It has a long way to go just to survive, but that's not to say that they don't have anything going for them. The Xbox has perhaps the most powerful hardware of any of the next gen games out there, easy to use development tools and some loyal fans in the gaming world. Microsoft isn't showing their best right now, to think that their launch titles are the best that will ever be for the console is really narrow-sighted. The potential of all the next-gen systems has far from been reached. The true time to judge this round of the console wars will be next holiday season at the earliest. By then, all 3 major developers will have strong installed bases and developers will have a better feel for the potential of all systems. Although, you may be quite right in your assumption that this round of console wars is just a case of MS testing the waters. Microsoft has been itching to merge computers into more and more home appliances and sees the video game industry as the best way to get it's box in living rooms across the country. I would be quite interested to see what other features they incorporate into a much more comprehensive entertainment system in the next generation of console design. But of course, I could just be a rambling idiot with far too much free time on my hands....you be the judge :).

    4. Re:The console wars... by newbiescum · · Score: 1

      Again, that's why I put best in quotation marks. However, regarding why I chose to use the word 'best', I have yet to find any future title in the X-Box lineup that has matched the hype that Halo, Oddworld, and DOA3 were given 6 months ago. Look at it this way, people knew the following games were coming out later for PS2 (meaning past 6 months of initial launch): Gran Turismo 3, GTA3, THPS3, FFX, Metal Gear Solid 2, surely FFXI, etc. Those are the heavy hitters that have been spread out over the past 6 months and looking forward in the next few months. These are the megatitles that are practically guranteed to sell in the multimillion range. There's also the next few in-house development titles like Jak and Dexter which are going to be alright. What am I suppose to look forward to on the X-Box? Through all the hype of the X-Box, I haven't seen one game in the future past Christmas that has been hyped at all.

      I don't think anyone is expecting PS2 to be dethroned in this generation of the console wars. Yes, they will lose lots of fans, but you always do when you have one powerful system launching a year or more later. With all honesty, just by the hard number of hardware sales, PS2 will have the bigger number of owners in the end. It's a very tough enviornment now (whether that be economically because of the lack of consumer confidence or competitively with 3 titans battling for mindshare) for either MS or Nintendo even with Sony's previous mistakes.

  60. WTF!? by KajiCo · · Score: 1

    Can somebody please make an unbiased review. How can you expect a good review of anything when the first paragraph attacks Microsoft...

    1. Re:WTF!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you expected anything else? Expecting an un-biased anything on /. is impossible.

  61. It's just a PC .... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but it's a PC with a fixed set of hardware.

    Boy I pitty the PC game developers having to make sure their games work on all the different video cards out there, having to pick a common feature set or having the game not look too good on the older cards. With the Xbox they can milk the display for all it's worth. (Wonder what chipset MS chose for this and how good it is). Ditto for the sound system.

    1. Re:It's just a PC .... by Sno\/\/birD · · Score: 1

      XBox uses a custom NVIDIA graphics GPU. Think of something more powerful than GeForce 3. I believe they are also using NVIDIA for all the sound also. Quality.

      --
      Jeff -- skibum, among other things
  62. Halo by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 2

    From the Salon article: It's already drawn the interest of PC gamers, who often dismiss console games as brainless kiddy fodder.

    Maybe the reason it drew interest from us PC gamers was that Halo was announced ages ago as a PC/Mac game, a situation which changed dramatically when MS bought out Bungie?

    I'm not alone in being extremely disappointed in Bungie over this. I remember desperately looking forward to Halo a year ago, but now I probably won't even buy it. (And not out of spite; by the time the PC version is out, I'm sure there'll be much more attractive games available. That's if the PC version ever gets done at all.)

    --
    -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    1. Re:Halo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not alone in being extremely disappointed in Bungie over this.

      Are you on crack? Bungie is a fucking division of Microsoft now. What the hell do you expect them to do? Say no to thier managers?

    2. Re:Halo by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1

      Please read my post again. If you still find it difficult to understand that what I'm disappointed in is Bungie selling out to Microsoft in the first place, then maybe I am on crack. (Or maybe you are?)

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    3. Re:Halo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you have preferred that they go out of business altogether?

  63. Special features are the key to xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example, it is the only console capable of driving a high definition TV (although Sony claims the playstation 2 could do that if the game was written properly). Otherwise, the xbox seems average at best (I've seen reports of 30 fps average in most games, with an upper limit of 60 fps). After all, it's just a low end PC...

    1. Re:Special features are the key to xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd love to see any console get more than 60fps, considering that's the refresh rate of a television.


      You class a GeForce3 as low end?

    2. Re:Special features are the key to xbox by Paladine97 · · Score: 1

      The Gamecube can also take advantage of HDTV's (progressive mode).

  64. Xbox log ripped from OSX IE by bodland · · Score: 1

    The stop button on MS's version of IE is exactly like the X Box logo. They must have the same designers.

    1. Re:Xbox log ripped from OSX IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this falls under the category of "So FUCKING what!"

      Geeez. Get a life, Looser.

    2. Re:Xbox log ripped from OSX IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny...both products are from the SAME FUCKING COMPANY

  65. wait by Rai · · Score: 0

    if you insist on buying on of these, let microsoft's quality control history be your guide, and wait a while. is the first service pack already out?

  66. Store "take overs"?? by Pyrosz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I noticed the other day that http://www.futureshop.ca [Lazy Link] has had their site taken over by MS for the XBox. Now I dont mind advertising, but, having something pushed in my face like that when I could be shopping for something like the GC kinda upsets me. I know major retail stores do tend to play favorites with certain companies but this is over the edge I think. So, do you think stores should be monopolised (heh) like this?

    --

    An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    1. Re:Store "take overs"?? by Rupert · · Score: 2

      Worse than that ...

      I read in the paper this morning that FutureShop is being bought by Best Buy.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
  67. Nationalism is yesterdays news by Improv · · Score: 2

    Why do you really care what country certain
    industries are based? It's quite possible to
    make games for it regardless of where the hardware
    is made. There's no good reason that you should
    choose to identify more with an american company
    than a japanese one -- they're all just people.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:Nationalism is yesterdays news by tang · · Score: 1

      True, But previous to this Game consoles (and many times games) came out first overseas, in the country where the owners were. Finally an American company is in the mix, and I get the console first:) And maybe some good games that will then never be released anywhere else.

    2. Re:Nationalism is yesterdays news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because all the geeks here have a big fucking hard-on over Japan.

  68. your statements don't work by ebbv · · Score: 5, Interesting


    you claim things are good (such as having a PC in the living room or having an ethernet or a harddrive on a console) but you don't explain why these things are good.

    i'll tell you my take; both of those things are not good in and of themselves.

    i don't have my PC in my living room, it's in my bedroom. the console is in the living room with the TV. i play different games on them, completely different (RTS, RPG on the computer, Gran Turismo, Mario, Zelda, Final Fantasy (which are not RPG IMHO) on the console.)

    an ethernet connection on a console isn't some gaming messiah. there are currently no games which i could see benefitting from this on any console, nor any in the future. same with having a hard drive. great, it'd lead to faster and more saved games. dandy. personally i don't run out of space on my memory cards, but that's me. this by itself is not a reason to buy a console.

    as this salon article says (and i hate salon), it's the games, stupid. great games sell consoles, mediocre games sell a few as will the flood of adverts that MS has put out.

    but in the end, there are no interesting games for the console, thus it is uninteresting and will ultimately fail.

    personally, i'm spending $700 on a new computer which has more than twice the power (and 5 times the storage space, and that's nothing) of the X-box. there are actually interesting games for this computer i'm buying; civ3, dark ages of camelot, max payne (which i still haven't played), et cetera.

    anyway, this is a dead horse i'll stop beating it.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:your statements don't work by Red+Avenger · · Score: 1

      I disagree with you and am willing to make a wager with you. I bet you $300 bucks that the Xbox will not "fail". Have you even actually seen or played the games?

      It is about the games stupid. Why don't you check em out. They speak for themselves.

    2. Re:your statements don't work by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Informative

      an ethernet connection on a console isn't some gaming messiah. there are currently no games which i could see benefitting from this on any console, nor any in the future.

      I share your opinion with PC good for some games, console for others (although, I'll add sports games to the console). Now you mentioned "Gran Turisimo" and I mention "sports" for console. Once you play a game for, say, a month, you understand the AI and what to expect. The only way you get replayability is by playing the unpredictable human opponents. Especially for Racing and Sports games. Ethernet is a messiah for consoles, because I can play my football games over and over again, and still lose, cause there's always a better human opponent out on the net (and the computer isn't a challenge anymore).

      Just my opinion.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    3. Re:your statements don't work by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

      an ethernet connection on a console isn't some gaming messiah. there are currently no games which i could see benefitting from this on any console, nor any in the future. same with having a hard drive. great, it'd lead to faster and more saved games. dandy. personally i don't run out of space on my memory cards, but that's me. this by itself is not a reason to buy a console.

      Let me guess. A few years ago you were saying that nobody would buy a console with a CD-ROM drive.. 3d is a fad.. 16-bit is a buzzword.. nobody needs a controller with more than 2 buttons. Innovation happens. There are PC games that benefit from a broadband connection or a hard drive. Why not on a console?

    4. Re:your statements don't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me continue to beat on that horse....

      The last console game platform I bought was the N64 when it first came out. I've since given that away to friends for free. Quite frankly, I don't have time to play much games anymore and if I ever need that itch there are plenty of PC games. I understand the xbox costs $299, holy cow. How much are games? Thats $299 that I could use to upgrade my PC, or better yet buy some MS stock because all you junkies buying that crap.

    5. Re:your statements don't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just get some friends, you know _real_ people, to come and play the games with you. Oh right, I forgot, you don't have any _real_ friends, just some people you know on the internet. Get a life!

    6. Re:your statements don't work by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      An ethernet connection is certainly a "gaming messiah". I don't exactly feel like tying up my phone line so I can play POD Speedzone or Phantasy Star Online considering I have a great broadband connection at home. Sega got the idea right with the Broadband Adapater for the DC, but they had the mentality "Well, this game doesn't NEED broadband, so why should it support it?" That stopped me from playing lots of online games because I simply refuse to get a dialup account, and I refuse to tie up my phone line to do it.

    7. Re:your statements don't work by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      personally, i'm spending $700 on a new computer which has more than twice the power (and 5 times the storage space, and that's nothing) of the X-box. there are actually interesting games for this computer i'm buying; civ3, dark ages of camelot, max payne (which i still haven't played), et cetera.

      I doubt that it has twice the power of the X-Box's graphics or sound devices... there's nothing on the consumer market that you can buy currently that compares.

      Even so, even if you did manage to match the X-Box specs, let me let you into a little secret...

      Games development houses won't be able to give you all of the features that your system could theoretically run with.

      Your game will typically run with NORMAL or ABOVE_NORMAL thread priority. Anything else will cripple the rest of the system.

      On the XBox, it'll run full pelt, with system services running in the background. No need for anything more than a minor priority boost - it won't be running anything else other than device drivers and ethernet connectivity.

      On your super-duper PC, you could have any of a range of graphics cards, all with different capabilities. You could have one of about 5 different processor types, each with different feature sets and instructions (some have MMX, some have 3D-Now... some have ... and so on and so on)

      Games developers target the lowest common denominator, optimizing for 'reasonably common' cases. This might not include your card. For example, unless a team is just starting out developing a game today, it's unlikely that the finished game will include pixel shading. Or high-order surfaces.

      Xbox? It's standard hardware. This frees up a lot of creativity in a developer -- they can write to the METAL. They don't have to consider that there may be over 30 different cards to support, or 4 or 5 subsets of processors, or 8 different sound cards -- they can guarantee that whatever they do on their dev box will work out there in the real world.

      That's power. And that is the advantage of the XBox over a standard PC.

      Sure, there's disadvantages too -- but thems the breaks.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    8. Re:your statements don't work by geekoid · · Score: 2

      the problem with you 700 dollar computer is htat non of the game are written for your EXACT architexture. All the games must be designed for the average hardware usinf the same API's which are designed for average hardware.
      That is why games could be better for the consol then the PC, even a more powerfull PC.
      I would love to see where I can find a PC for 700 that comes with an Geforce3 that can run the latested games well.Not just the min. req. I mean run it as well and pretty as a consol.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:your statements don't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on a highly successful troll! It had all the obvious bits (except you didn't link to cdpb or anything like that), and they didn't get it. Apparently at least 3 mods hadn't heard of on-line gaming ("there are currently no games which i could see benefitting from this on any console, nor any in the future"), custom music and faster load times ("same with having a hard drive"), or Halo ("there are no interesting games for the console"). Additionally, they didn't even bother to read your posting history, which makes it much more obvious (although again, you miss any penis bird stuff-- is that passe now?).

      Just goes to show how knee-jerk the mods are when they want someone to represent their point of view. You demonstrated that quite well, but I felt I'd summarize just in case a few people didn't get it.

    10. Re:your statements don't work by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's the games that make a console - but more specifically, it's going to be the games that people actually want to play that make the console.

      Yeah, Halo looks nifty, but it's just another FPS. Personally, I'm sick of FPS. Furthermore, Halo for XBox lacks network/online gaming support - something that the PC/Mac version *will* include.

      The Oddworld series never grabbed me - regardless of which platform it appeared on.

      Dead Or Alive 3, I guarantee will appear on another console (look at Dead Or Alive 2, which was "Dreamcast only" until it came out for PS2.)

      Looking into XBox's future a bit, I still don't see the need to buy this system. Tony Hawk2x, SSX Tricky, Tony Hawk 3, Silent Hill2 Director's Cut, and Metal Gear Solid X, are *all* remakes or ports of existing games. In addition, things like SSX Tricky and Tony Hawk 3 will appear on Game Cube as well as PS2.

      While I don't think XBox will be a spectacular failure, I don't expect it to be a major force in this generation of consoles, given the current announced lineup.

    11. Re:your statements don't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yhbt kthx

    12. Re:your statements don't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halo is not first person.

    13. Re:your statements don't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An unlimited number of human opponents aren't necessarily going to give a game greater replay value. Would you start playing tic-tac-toe again if Microsoft released it on the xbox with internet play enabled?

    14. Re:your statements don't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Built-in broadband is a good bet for the XBox's target market (we'll decribe them as l33t g8m3z with an income)

      It's not a good bet for a general market product because only like 7% of the US market has broadband, maybe a third of those have the NAT box and the network knowledge necessary to make it work.

      Problem with the "elite gamers" plan is that they all own computers! WTF would they have broadband otherwise? Open question how attractive the xBox is to that market. Nobody's signing up for broadband just for XBox games.

  69. Get one on eBay by Lizard_King · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are really cheap on on eBay.

    --
    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
    1. Re:Get one on eBay by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      INFORMATIVE??? INFORMATIVE??

      The moderators are on crack. It was a joke (funny one too). Click on the damned link before moderating, people!!

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    2. Re:Get one on eBay by nick_burns · · Score: 1

      This link contains the truly sad part. The fact that not one, but several people bid this up is quite sad.

    3. Re:Get one on eBay by nick_burns · · Score: 1

      And go ahead and purchase your gamecube box here.

  70. Are the service packs out yet? by saintNiX · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    And where can I get them?

  71. Bill Brother is playing with us. by dda · · Score: 1

    Why do some of you want to help Bill Brother to be the master of all the technology oriented markets ?
    I personaly think it's better to have the right to choose, and always investing in the same company ( the same that want to be present everywhere ) will not help at all.
    I know the concurents are also big ones ( which prove we can them ), but I don't want to accept M$ on this market, especially because they nothing better to provide than the others.

    1. Re:Bill Brother is playing with us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personaly think it's better to have the right to choose.


      Thanks, then I guess you won't mind me choosing the Xbox because it looks like it's the best system available. I'm not looking to help out "Bill Brother" either (and I'm not looking to hurt him), but as long as he's putting out the best product (XP, VS.NET, Xbox, etc.), I'm there baby.

  72. Ex-XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sadly, my XBox arrived defective. While it plays the opening logo sequence, it immediately locks up at that point and displays a multilingual screen that indicates that the unit requires service.

    It was quite a letdown from the 2 hour wait to purchase the sucker. Customer support was contacted, but their process takes 2-3 weeks to replace a defective unit.

    I'm seriously unimpressed. But my opinion doesn't really matter unless 1% or more of my fellow early adopters have similar experiences, at which point, MS has a problem.

  73. YES by gfxguy · · Score: 2

    I was scanning posts to see somebody hadn't beat me to it - think of a relatively nice PC with superb graphics and a lot of other bells and whistles - all at $300. If you could buy these in bulk and turn them into a nice internet appliance with all sorts of multimedia features, that be a truly ironic kick in the pants to MS.

    It be great if half the people who bought them didn't buy a single game.

    And when MS starts complaining, all I can ask is why they didn't see it coming. Of course, the XBOX will probably come with some shrink wrap agreement saying you can't do jack to it, so we'll all somehow be violating the DMCA if we try to hack it - no hack websites, because the government flunkies will bow to the will of MS (just like they did with the RIAA and MPAA).

    Oh well, you can't keep a good hack down for long. I may actually put off buying a second "real" PC until we see what we can do with one of these.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  74. Yup, it's here! by J05H · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen the XBOX itself yet, but I can here at least one of my roommates downstairs, howling periodically at it, probably playing DOA3. He's also blocked out the next 5 or so days for playing new games and nothing else. yikes.

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  75. too bad it was going to be a big leap forward by ebbv · · Score: 1


    being a big cross-breed between RTS and FPS.. but MS required bungie to orient it more toward the X-Box.

    i mean, how would an RTS really play on a console? those that have been ported over have been very poor echoes of their PC versions.

    oh well :P yet another possibly great thing MS managed to stomp into the ground.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:too bad it was going to be a big leap forward by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      being a big cross-breed between RTS and FPS.. but MS required bungie to orient it more toward the X-Box.
      oh well :P yet another possibly great thing MS managed to stomp into the ground.


      I'm not convinced. Fanboys deified Bungie and Halo years before anyone had ever seen the game. I think this is just yet another case of too much hype and people willingly buying into it. (And everyone ignoring that it is much, much easier for a game developer to *claim* they will do something than to actually deliver.)

      Halo has been used a rallying cry by various factions, and those factions have changed dramatically over the course of its development. At first the Mac owners were screaming about Halo, because Bungie started as a Mac company. Then Windows users were using it as an example of game that you needed a PC for, that just couldn't be done on a console. Then Xbox fans were using it as a way of putting down the PS2. Of course none of these groups ever played the game, and in the end it turned out to be much less than everyone had built it up to be.

    2. Re:too bad it was going to be a big leap forward by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Well, if M$ was smart, they could have made a version of their Strategic Commander for XBOX, to compensate for the lack of a full keyboard. Then, any serious RTS-er would buy it (like racers buy wheels), while the console-kiddies could make do with less-than-optimal gamepad functions. There's no reason to say that Halo had to be 'dumbed down' for the XBOX.

    3. Re:too bad it was going to be a big leap forward by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Funny
      From the article:

      it's not clear the Bungie name will draw in console players. Especially considering its "hero," known only as the Master Chief -- a nameless ultracommando in a bulky power suit.


      Now if they changed that to Master Chef - and had Lloyd Grossman flying around in a shiny suit - they might have a surefire hit.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    4. Re:too bad it was going to be a big leap forward by jafac · · Score: 2

      To verify your claim about Halo being too much hype - one only needs to look at Oni: expectations vs. reality.

      Sigh.
      The thing is - in BOTH of these games, demos had much touted awesome features, that the final versions did not.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    5. Re:too bad it was going to be a big leap forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Guy from UK detected.
      Flame on.

    6. Re:too bad it was going to be a big leap forward by iso · · Score: 2

      Maybe it's only because I didn't hear of the hype, but Oni is one my favourite games. Sure it would be a little longer-lasting if it had multiplayer, but I'm curious: what "awesome featuers" were touted in Oni that didn't make it into the release?

      - j

    7. Re:too bad it was going to be a big leap forward by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      "Now if they changed that to Master Chef - and had Lloyd Grossman flying around in a shiny suit - they might have a surefire hit."

      Or Iron Chef ... they could have had an absolutely vicious Corn Battle. Or maybe a Pheasant Battle.

  76. Re:For a different perspective...about xbox music by acomj · · Score: 1, Troll
    check out the NYtimes about how MS doesn't pay (for all practical purposes) for the music the Xbox uses. Hardly gives exposure to the bands too..


    NYtimes article.. For MusiciansX box is no jackpot.



    I guess they didn't get to be rich by writing a lot of checks.... (thanks homer)..

  77. PS2 Vs. XBox : 128bit Processor Vs. 32bit Processo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a question, the Xbox's main CPU runs at 700mhz but is only a 32 bit processor, however the 400mhz processor in a PS2 is 128 bit, so couldn't the PS2 move 4 times as much data?

  78. Xbox launch in your town? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Forgetting the fanboy comments for a minute, I'm really curious as to what the Xbox launch was like in places around the country. Here in Atlanta, it was pretty embarrassing. I hit a couple of Best Buys and WalMarts to see if the crowds were as crazy as the PS2 release. At 2 stores there were a handful of people and at 3 others there WASN'T ONE PERSON IN LINE! This is after 11pm too, so I must say I was surprised. I think the folkes at Best Buy were a little confused as well.

    So what was it like everywhere else?

    (Please mod up so we can get some kind of useful thread going on this story)

    1. Re:Xbox launch in your town? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A couple people were camped in front of Target and Best Buy, but the response was pretty underwhelming. A mile away, the place I bought my, sadly, defective XBox stayed open until midnight to sell them: they only sold half of their allotment of 12. I hope some are left over when they open. DOA3 and Halo are cool, and it sucks to not be able play them.

      This looks to be a pretty underwhelming launch. I'm sure the hardcores pre-ordered and/or stood in line, but it doesn't look like the hype extended much past that.

      I predict the media will call the launch a disaster if the GameCube launch is better, which I suspect it will be.

      Fortunately, I pre-ordered the latter.

    2. Re:Xbox launch in your town? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not too sure about that, seeing how the GameCube's launch was already a disaster in its own country. I don't know if any other stores in Louisville was selling the Xbox at midnight (I heard that Meijers was, but had a bad lottery system to determine who got them), but the 5 Walmarts completely sold out of them. Supposedly the one I was at was the last to fill up, so it got a lot of people from different parts of town, but the very last opening (there were 28 at this store) didn't get taken until 10 or 10:30. I got there around 8:30 myself, and about half the spots were taken, but it ended up being a pretty fun wait as everybody was in a good and talkative mood. (Save for about 15 seconds of angry yelling right at the very end as they started handing out the tickets in reverse order than how people arrived. That is, the last person to show up got the first voucher. D'oh!)

      Luckily I had bought Halo before I even got in line, because it sold out before it even hit midnight (I saw some statistic saying that it was expected that 70% of Xbox buyers planned to buy Halo with their system, so didn't want to take any chances). Man am I glad, too, because that game is seriously sweet. Anyway, that's my tale from yesterday.

    3. Re:Xbox launch in your town? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Chicago during my lunch hour, at 11:30am the Best Buy I checked out was pretty dead (people actually have jobs in Chicago). Anyways, of the handful of people in the games section, a few people were lined up playing the GameCube Star Wars game...I also just realized how tiny the system is...pretty damn cool. Anyways, no one seemed at all interested in anything X-Box related. I was personally there to snatch up Metal Gear Solid 2, and two other people snagged copies in the 30 seconds I was in that isle. So, based on this admittedly small sample and observation, I would say that things don't look too hot for X-Box. The feeling I've been getting off the street recently has been that people just don't care. It's like 3DO all over again. Lest we forget, its designers too claimed it to be technologically well beyond any of its competition when it was released, and I can't say that no one was impressed by it's store demos,yet it fell flat because of...get ready for it...price and poor software selection, and got absolutely spanked by the older cartridge based systems. I must say I can't see Microsoft being able to dodge the same problem. If they're lucky, X-Box will be the modern equivalent of the Neo-Geo system...not wildly popular, but a loyal niche market. Again, if they're lucky...as all hell. In reality, I see this whole thing appearing on F*ckedCompany before the year is over.

    4. Re:Xbox launch in your town? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the stores in Philadelphia had lines, but they also didn't participate in midnight launches. The reason for this is all of the problems with the PS2 launch. People were stabbed, shot at, etc., for a chance to steal one of the few consoles sold. The stores did not want to deal with this, so they quietly packed them away and let presold units go to presellers with receipts whenever they felt like strolling in. However, most of these stores have pre-sold out, and continue to sell out quickly. You can nab units from EB online, since they absolutely refuse to presell until a shipment is confirmed, so every few days you'll have a window to preorder from another shipment.

  79. Green Screen of Death by instinctdesign · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that you get that message when you try to put a non-X Box CD in the system. So its not really an error because of the X-Box, just a really horrible way for MS to have worded and displayed the message.

    --
    forma3
    1. Re:Green Screen of Death by erasmus_ · · Score: 1

      You're wrong. I put in a burned cd into the system yesterday, and the message it returns states exactly what it should. The old development green screen Xbox shot has nothing to do with the released final system.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
  80. Breaking News - Musicians are stupid! by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 2
    From the article:
    "I asked them who else was on the soundtrack and made some suggestions, but they said they wanted to stick with certain labels because they didn't have to pay for licensing."
    Then the guy quoted gave MS his label's music. For free! Maybe someone should have clued this guy into the fact that MS needs a certain type of music for the game that was being discussed (an "extreme" snowboard game which needs punk music.)

    I, for one, would be pissed off to find out that Bad Religion got no money love out of Crazy Taxi. Music can make a game, it shouldn't be given to a megacorporation without compensation.

    -sk

    1. Re:Breaking News - Musicians are stupid! by Raptor+CK · · Score: 2

      Bad Religion *didn't* make any money off of Crazy Taxi.

      I'll assume that this is mostly because The Offspring provided the music.

      Bad Religion probably did rake in some change for Tony Hawk 2, though.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
    2. Re:Breaking News - Musicians are stupid! by Refrag · · Score: 2

      The Offspring and Bad Religion did the soundtrack for Crazy Taxi.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  81. Will Developers take advantage of the hardware? by rootmonkey · · Score: 1

    Typically games on console platforms are better or look just as good as PC games despite the hardware on the PC is superior. This happens because game developers can optimize code for the specific platform. Will developers for the Xbox do this as well? Or will they still want to release PC versions down the road that will cause them to write for the lowest common denomenator. Thus causing the software to suffer. It seems that if Halo was targetted to be released on the XBox from the start and not for the PC would it have looked better?

    --

    Yes but every time I try to see it your way, I get a headache.
    1. Re:Will Developers take advantage of the hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use to work for a sister company of the development team for Halo, before MS bought them from Take 2 Interactive. This game was originally for PC not XBOX, but when MS buys you, you develop for XBOX. The early Alpha looked much better on the pc version.

  82. WTF? by smack_attack · · Score: 1

    One wonders if J. Allard even knows that "Run Lola Run" was actually brought to us by Sony.

    Unless Sony is suddenly a German company, this guy needs to get his facts straight. The only part Sony has in this movie was buying the distribution rights a couple years after it was released.

    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence the term, "brought to us by Sony." The distributor is the one who distributes the movie.

  83. XBOX.com slashdotted ?! by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1

    www.xbox.com isn't responding !! HTTP Error 500-13 - Server too busy
    Internet Information Services

    1. Re:XBOX.com slashdotted ?! by doob · · Score: 1

      Not now, now it says:


      Under Construction
      The site you were trying to reach does not currently have a default page. It may be in the process of being upgraded.

      Please try this site again later. If you still experience the problem, try contacting the Web site administrator.

      --
      In the spoon, there is no Soviet Russia!
  84. Linu Xbox by abe+ferlman · · Score: 2

    When linux has been successfully ported to these machines, I will buy one.

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
  85. half-assed coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I know Michael just wants the xbox to fail, so the "borg" can't take over, but his coverage is so lazy, it's laughable. He should spend as much time on other articles as he does with his pet fave YRO garbage.

    Here's some other links in case you guys want some more balanced takes on the xbox.

    Firing Squad's coverage

    Game Spot's coverage

    ZDNet's stuff

    Providing a little balance to the Michael's rantings and ravings.

  86. the problem is that, yes anastasia... by ebbv · · Score: 2, Insightful


    you can build a better PC for the cost you're talking about. bigger harddrive will be $100, so for $400 you can build a better machine than the X-Box. :P or right around there anyway, and it will have a case that's actually a lot easier to work on! (and hell you can buy one of those fancy-schmansy all aluminum cases.)
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  87. X-Box Linux Contest. by smack_attack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am giving the domain xboxlinux.com to the first person to successfully port/install Linux to the X-Box. No cost, no strings except you must be willing to continue work on it and release it to the public in some form.

    1. Re:X-Box Linux Contest. by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it have been easier to group up with a few Open Source people in the newsgroups and purchase the domain together? That's like me getting www.linuxblender.com and crossing my fingers.

    2. Re:X-Box Linux Contest. by smack_attack · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I'm not sure I get what you're saying...

      I originally bought the domain with the intention of making a parody/satire site spoofing Microsoft and Linux, but I don't have time to do YET ANOTHER PROJECT.

      Moving down the list of things to do with it... I am not a kernel hacker, just a surly PHP coder. I don't forsee myself hacking the X-Box anytime soon. So the next viable option was to just give it away (or sell it to some crackhead domain squatter who will throw pop-under ads all over it, no thanks).

      I have it, and I'm giving it away, please enlighten me how it could be any easier than that.

    3. Re:X-Box Linux Contest. by _Neurotic · · Score: 1

      I see what you're saying, but perhaps if you were to offer the domain to someone who would champion the project from it's inception instead of requiring a successful port first...

      Justin

    4. Re:X-Box Linux Contest. by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      Have you ever cruised around sourceforge.net? Notice how many projects are in a perpetual "Planning" stage? I'd rather wait and possibly have 2-3 groups race each other than to have one group lose interest.

    5. Re:X-Box Linux Contest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I think this is a cool idea. I just wish there was something there now! If I see a succesful port to the X-box, I'm buying one.

    6. Re:X-Box Linux Contest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      PHP bites.

    7. Re:X-Box Linux Contest. by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1
      Dude. You can get blender for Linux. Just go to blender.nl.

      Cryptnotic

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    8. Re:X-Box Linux Contest. by Omerna · · Score: 2

      Shouldn't the name have been linuxbox.com ?

      --


      No sig for you.
  88. Graphics Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think it's all about the graphics, then the Sega Saturn would never have died so quickly. The Saturn outperformed the Playstation on many levels, yet, in the end, it was all about the games. Sony had enough sense to allow developers to create shitloads of games, good or bad, and allow the marketplace to decide which succeeded and which didn't, whilst developers still paid the fees to develop. Nintendo's N64 failed despite their "quality-assured" games, because there wasn't enough of them, good or bad. Sega had good games as well, but didn't release as many as Sony.

  89. Oh yeah, I expect Salon to be unbiased with MS. by Shivetya · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    NOT!

    Slashdot editors are really scraping the bottom of the barrel in their overt attempts to bash Microsoft. They do so at any cost, and by that I mean regardless if it makes them look like biased buffoons or not.

    Salon is the last place I go for anything remotely to unbiased reporting. Seems Slashdot wants to follow suit.

    The X-Box should be judged for what it is, and that is an attempt to offer flexibility to developers to make the games they could only wish to create for the PC. Microsoft or not, I would love to see some real creativity in the market that didn't involve a regular game company.

    Can Ms provide that? I don't know, but I won't slight them based upon a Salon review, in fact if Salon bashes them at all I see it as more of a reason to look at the product.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Oh yeah, I expect Salon to be unbiased with MS. by newbiescum · · Score: 1

      The X-Box should also be seen as MS's way of trying to get into a multibillion dollar industry at any cost (either by outright purchasing development teams or by offering multimillion dollar exclusive contracts). Is that a good thing?

      Furthermore, if you believe that having an open box will permit more creative developers to come forth, I think there are many more barriers of entry that are far greater than simply having a box that is slightly easier to develop for than say the GameCube. In an industry which can no longer bet on small shop developers, titles require multimillion dollar budgets over the course of years. Don't expect MS to hand out a X-Box game license to any developer. Furthermore, there's a reason why there are only a few Sid Meirs, John Romeros (a good thing? =), Sim's developers, Warren Spectors, etc. It doesn't matter what tools you are given, there are very few good game designers.

      What I worry is that the X-Box makes it too easy for PC developers to cross to console development making for mediocore games. How many innovative PC titles have you seen recently? Halo (another FPS), DOA3 (this is really just upgraded graphics), THPS2x, etc. are hardly creative except for their latest additions in the graphics department.

      Yes, the box is powerful, however, if you expect innovation to come forth, don't get your hopes too high.

    2. Re:Oh yeah, I expect Salon to be unbiased with MS. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Bias or not, considering MS's past practices any tme MS moves into a new market one should be concerned.
      There history clearly shows that MS does not want to compete in any market, they want to be the sole provider of the markets products.
      Any bias towards MS they have earned themselves.
      this is like saying Jews are biased against Hitler. Well, duh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  90. XBox as Linux workstation by Drew+Sullivan · · Score: 1

    Stop thinking of the XBox as a game console and think of it as a subsidized Linux workstation. It would be the ultimate irony that the only people to buy the XBox are Linux supporters.

    --
    -- Linux Consultant
    1. Re:XBox as Linux workstation by Red+Avenger · · Score: 1

      Totally go buy an Xbox today. I sincerely doubt Linux will ever be able to "play" on the Xbox.

    2. Re:XBox as Linux workstation by FiskeBoller · · Score: 1

      I like the idea of MS subsidizing a cheap Linux PC.

      Sony has Linux for the PS2; is the XBox worth the effort of a port?

  91. Salon's biased look at innovative games... by 2Flower · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Salon is overlooking something very critical. They run down the list of X-Box titles and call them boring and pedestrian, then detail FUTURE Sony titles that will be innovative...

    But they don't mention any future X-Box titles which will innovate, other than a dismissive mention of the 2002 lineup which claims to have 'nothing ambitious'.

    Are they forgetting that Sega has close ties with Microsoft? Jet Set Radio Future, the first franchise to effectively work cel shading into the game's stylistic approach, is due out for X-Box. In addition, Shenmue, the series which redefined how adventure games and peristent worlds work on Dreamcast, will be an X-box franchise from now on. US gamers will be getting Shenmue 2 on X-box alone.

    If you're going to hold one console above another, at least consider all aspects of both, rather than forgetting a key area. That's just good journalism, whatever your preference for gaming platforms or your like/dislike of Microsoft may be.

    1. Re:Salon's biased look at innovative games... by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Feh. Shenmue sucked, IMHO. Maybe Shenmue 2 will be better, who knows?

      Sega has repeatedly stated their intention to remain "platform agnostic". They are going to be doing time-limited exclusives out the wazoo (see JSRF, Panzer Dragoon, Super Monkey Ball, Virtua Fighter 4, Shenmue 2, etc.) but (for the most part) each and every one of these games will be seeing face time on each of the consoles (GC, PS2, XB). It will just depend on when the exclusivity arrangements expire.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    2. Re:Salon's biased look at innovative games... by Vlastyn · · Score: 1

      From what I remember reading, they mentioned a number of Playstation 2 titles that are available now: MGS2, Grand Theft Auto 3, Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3, Half-Life, etc.

      "Future" titles like Baldur's Gate, Dynasty Warriors 3, Frequency, even FFX are right around the corner.

      They also said that the reason they can't commeont on future X-Box titles is because there haven't been many official announcements yet.

    3. Re:Salon's biased look at innovative games... by newbiescum · · Score: 1

      Actually, many people will also be importing Shenmue 2 from overseas (UK, Japan) since their original save games have the possibility of working with the sequel and DC is the native platform plus Shenmue 2 would be available sooner that way. If people are still sticking to DC and are willing to forgive Sega's backstabbing, you have to expect them to go to many lengths to get the sequel. Why pay ~$450 (memory card, cables, game, console) for a game that will import and have better features for the current DC owners for less than $75?

      Also AFAIK, there is no exclusive requirement for Shenmue 2 on X-Box. Sega would be stupid to become a one-console developer. They know that they can't afford to put all their eggs in one basket anymore and hope to be ok. And also I would argue Sega has closer times with Nintendo with rumors of sharing development teams, Sonic Team working on GameCube, and the fact that Phantasy Star Online is going to Nintendo first (which I view as a more important title in the long haul for them as this is the first step for console MMORPG).

  92. pies by update() · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    There was a big hoopla in Times Square last night, but apparently no one pied Bill Gates.

    Yeah, good thinking, Michael. Yesterday in New York would have been the perfect time to assault Bill Gates with an unknown white substance.

    Honestly, while I support the right to protest and yell as much as you want, I'm baffled by how everyone seems to think hitting someone with a pie is cute and harmless, and not an assault on someone's person. I suppose that's because it's limited to leftish causes -- I suspect if anti-abortionists went around throwing pies at feminists the response would be different.

    As loathsome as I find Willie Brown (why can't someone that brilliant use his skills to improve government instead of just manipulating it?) I give him credit for being the one recipient to insist that the attack on him be taken seriously. Second place goes to the elderly UK politician who decked the 20-something guy who pied him. (Said guy than had the nerve to whine about it.)

    Now if I were Bill Gates, I'd have offered $10,000 to the first person to pie the guy who nailed him, offer to be repeated on each of the next 60 days. What's the point of being a billionaire if you can't do something like that?

    1. Re:pies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I suspect if anti-abortionists went around throwing pies at feminists the response would be different.

      It would make a change from shooting people, I suppose, and would probably make them look less like raving fanatics and more like people who are promoting a cause.

    2. Re:pies by Tim+C · · Score: 2

      Second place goes to the elderly UK politician who decked the 20-something guy who pied him.

      I'm not entirely sure that "elderly" is fair, although the politician in question (John Prescott) must be in his (late?) fifties; I guess that's elderly to the average slashdotter. Also, it wasn't a pie, it was an egg.

      To put it in context a little, Mr Prescott was apparently an amateur boxer in his younger days, whilst in the navy I think. I don't think he was anything particularly special, but personally I wouldn't tangle with an ex-boxer :-)

      (Said guy than had the nerve to whine about it.)

      Not that it did him any good - the police decided not to press charges.

      Cheers,

      Tim

  93. Servers by Apreche · · Score: 2

    When is someone going to come out with Linux for XBox. Seriously, the equivalent PC to an XBox costs oh so much more. If I could get Linux on there I've got cheap cheap servers. Tribes 2, Counterstrike, and Apache ahoy!

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  94. X-mas by Scurf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nomatter how good or bad, it will still be a great alternative for parents with no technical expertise to give to their children come X-mas.

    After all, who didn't get their first kick on computers on a VIC-20 or simular boxes...

    1. Re:X-mas by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

      Nah, then you have to worry about the fact that you can't find any games that are rated for your kid's age.

      Look at the titles.

      The only parents who will buy xBox will have late teens (17+), the rest would be better off with GameCube.

      -

      --
      --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  95. And the eBay stupidity begins... by fobbman · · Score: 5, Funny

    A couple auctions of interest. This one sold a link to where you can preorder the Xbox for a final bid of $407. Funny, considering the link is in the description and the seller says "If you decide to place a bid, then I will only resend you this website. So if you bid, you will not receive the xbox system, just a link to where you can purchase a x-box".

    The other auction of note is here, where the winner gets the box that the Xbox came in. The seller is very clear about the person only getting the box that it came in, yet the winning bid was still $366.

    Was a crime committed here? Nope. They were just helping the fool part from his money sooner.

    1. Re:And the eBay stupidity begins... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      LOL. Some people are just amazingly dumb. I mean, the first auction was mildly deceptive, but it was still spelled out right there. The second one wasn't even really deceptive, it CLEARLY stated at least two times that you were bidding on the box as a collector's item only. Worth, maybe 20 or 30 dollars to a hardcore collector. Maybe more. Not 400 dollars, though. Morons.

    2. Re:And the eBay stupidity begins... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Well there are fraud protection laws in America. Some of them deal with deceptive advertising - like saying one thing in bright bold letters and fine type (saying what it really is) and then giving them something different is most definately against the law.

      I agree that you should read over an auction carefully before purchasing something on there but there are rules to protect people from unsavory merchants.

    3. Re:And the eBay stupidity begins... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1
      Note that there being a winning bid does not mean that the seller is going to get any money or that the buyer ever has any intention of sending the seller money. It's not as if fake auctions have never occurred on eBay before.


      Cryptnotic

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  96. Re:PS2 Vs. XBox : 128bit Processor Vs. 32bit Proce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're an idiot.

  97. Add DivX and watch them fly off the shelf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I admit I don't plan on buying an X-Box at this point, so I haven't done my homework and thus don't know all of the techincal details about the machine.

    But it seems to me that since it is made to be more of a computer entertaiment type box and has an internal hard drive that someone might figure out a way to get it to play DivX encoded movies.
    That could be just the ticket to launch this machine into sucess. Of course that is not Microsoft's goal, as they want to make money by selling games, not promoting the piracy of movies.
    Piracy can be a powerful ally for hardware makers. Think about it, it worked for Sony's first playstation, once CDRW's became popular, everyone and there brother started coping games and chipping their boxes to play them. That made the playstation the most popular console ever. Napster(RIP)promoted MP3's which in turn forced hardware manufacturers to implement the codec into many of todays most popular DVD and car audio players. DivX could be just the ticket for the X-box.

  98. XBox Promomotions in Montreal by javacowboy · · Score: 1

    I was walking in downtown Montreal last Friday night and as I passed by the Paramount movie theatre, I saw three guys standing on the sidewalk wearing strange uniforms and a backpack upon which was attached a long pipe that mounted an flat-panel screen that was showing X-Box demos. It was freezing cold that night too.

    Also, as I walked by the local Blockbuster, I noticed there were TWO ENTIRE empty rows with shelves reserved for X-Box games. M$ must be paying Blockbuster a lot of money to promote an unproven product.

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
  99. We've seen this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    oh, yes... Microsoft makes operating systems. did it ever occur to you that they would want their devlopers to succeed? successful devopers make good games, which sells their OS, not to mention that consumers get good products, so everyone wins.

    Microsoft is in this to make money. They will. Patience... The grim reaper will visit...

    1. Re:We've seen this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      as far as i'm concerned, everyone does win with windows. it's a great OS at a reasonable price that can let you accomplish a ton with the wide variety of programs written for it.

    2. Re:We've seen this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but ms isn't satisfied just making oses, abviously. and they aren't satisfied letting other developers make money THEY could be making themselves, either!

    3. Re:We've seen this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I was just being sarcastic. These devolopers in time will get the shaft. Licensing fees and development platform costs will soon be a bitch. Some people never learn from history.

    4. Re:We've seen this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      games don't sell OS's...high school kids who work at CompUSA do.

    5. Re:We've seen this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone wins, unless you are a successful software startup with a product that might some day threaten the Windows monopoly. If you are, you will soon be bludgeoned out of buisness through any number of now-government-sanctioned means.

    6. Re:We've seen this before by Genom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist - but there's something bugging me...

      When the Dreamcast was released, one of the big points they tried to make (to the point of putting the emblem on the console itself) was that it would run WinCE. Obviously, MS had a part in this, and it was the first time we'd really seen them step into the console market (aside from the sublicensing of some games).

      Most developers, however, used Sega's proprietary OS instead of WinCE. There were only a handful of games that used WinCE, and not many were really high-profile.

      So MS lost out - their plan to license their OS into the console market failed.

      Then Sega makes the announcement - they're out of the console business - the Dreamcast is dead (long live the Dreamcast!).

      On top of that, MS announces they are entering the console market, and Sega announces most of their signature games will be on the XBox.

      It just seems a little too convenient, how Sega (who had at least some business relations with MS for their console) falls out of the way just before MS comes in.

      I think too much.

    7. Re:We've seen this before by randomgeek · · Score: 1

      So, are you saying that Microsoft was somehow responsible for most gamers thinking the Dreamcast sucked?
      It's more likely that Sega realized how screwed they were, and decided, "hey, MS has this slick console, maybe we'd make more money if we just did games, since our console thing seems to have gone down the shitter."

      Personally, I don't really care for consoles any more, so I could care less if it really were some conspiracy to wipe out a console. :)

    8. Re:We've seen this before by default+luser · · Score: 1

      So you're saying this had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with Sony's super-massive whiz-bang HYPE MACHINE.

      You know, the kind of hype that could cause console buyers to hesitate on purchasing a new platform a WHOLE YEAR before Sony brought any goods to market. That kinda hype.

      For those of you who never bothered to notice, the Dreamcast's graphics were definitely on-par with PS2. Were it not for some overhyped Emotion Engine 75 million poly / sec bullshit, not to mention a the few Playstation-only developers responsible for MAKING the system ( *cough* Square *cough* ), we would probably see the Dreamcast selling today.

      If you want to rip on Microsoft, think about it for a moment. Microsoft is simply a newcomer to the hype arena, and Sony is stitting on top of the throne.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    9. Re:We've seen this before by fodi · · Score: 0

      No he/she didn't say that. Merely that it might've influenced Segas decision.. OBVIOUSLY !!

    10. Re:We've seen this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice theory, but it's pretty clear that Sega just didn't have the capitialization to make it in the console market (which as you know involves selling millions of consoles at a big loss with the hope of making it back years down the road).

    11. Re:We've seen this before by Mandrias · · Score: 1

      Please ... please

      I don't know how you can claim most gamers thought the dreamcast sucked. Everyone I know that owns one is very satisfied and wishes their poor little gray box was still alive :(

      --
      Use the Z-modem protocol between Information Superhighway routers to compress the plaintext. ~LordOfYourPants
    12. Re:We've seen this before by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      If `most gamers` hadnt thought the DC sucked, there wouldnt be a problem. `Everyone i know` isnt `most gamers` - its probably about 20 or so max. Sega needed `most`, not 20.

  100. the games by archen · · Score: 1

    Truthfully I just bought a PS2 and I'm pretty happy with it. To me the biggest drag for the Xbox will be the lack of cool Japanese style games. This might change in the future, but whether or not the X-box will penetrate very far into Japan and sign on Japanese game makers has yet to be seen. And am I the only one that isn't so hot on net access for a console? To me, if I can't type at other people an online game doesn't have much of a point to it.

    from Cnet:

    "ndustry analysts have been estimating that Microsoft will have to absorb losses of $1 billion to $2 billion related to its effort to subsidize for the manufacturing of Xbox."

    Nice to see MS take in the rear for once :)

    1. Re:the games by Hidyman · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of Jet Set Radio?
      Check out Jet Set Radio Future from Sega.com
      Very cool 'Japaneese' style game.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me ...
  101. Design of the xBox by brokosz · · Score: 1

    I went to the XP launch (I know, I know... work made me) where Seamus Blackwell(I think) the Project Manager for the xBox did an hour+ demo. He was *definitely* not the standard MS type. He showed up in a black shirt, jeans, and cowboy boots when everyone else was wearing their MS uniform. He said he had worked as a designer for PS1, PS2, Genesis, NeoGeo, and several other gaming consoles. There were multiple references to how much better xBox (and gaming in general) was better than be addicted to coke, crack or your other hard drug of choice... It's nice to see that MS went for a platform designed by people that care about gaming, and not about the bottom line. It was also nice to see that MS was smart enough to hire the type of freaks they did to get it done right...

  102. Super Metroid by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Metroid was released in one of the last years of SNES supermacy. Hardly a 'launch' title.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  103. +3 Informative? by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 1

    Maybe the moderators should actually click the link before declaring this "informative".

    Troll? Maybe.
    funny? Maybe.
    Informative? heck no.

  104. Trust me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm from Microsoft and I'm here to help.

  105. Play it again... by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bad Religion did provide some of the music for Crazy Taxi. When I play on the Dreamcast, it's usually the second song, after the first one by The Offspring. From the game's web site: "Rockin' soundtrack by hit bands Offspring and Bad Religion."

    1. Re:Play it again... by Raptor+CK · · Score: 2

      Bah!

      Having played hours upon endless hours of this game and never hearing a Bad Religion track, this proves not that I'm wrong, but I must really suck at the game. Is it in the standard rotation, or do you have to unlock it by completing parts of the Crazy Box?

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
    2. Re:Play it again... by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      the problem is both bands sound the same

    3. Re:Play it again... by tt2k1 · · Score: -1

      Fuck you. Those Gayspring poseurs aren't worthy of licking ths shit out of Greg Hetson's asscrack.

      --

      Troll Tuesday 2001.

      --The Mess

  106. For Christ's Sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, that is NOT a "GSOD".

    That screenshot is from an Xbox Development Kit (XDK Launcher) so, duh, of course it's going to crash from time to time. But I'm sure you knew that already.

  107. Bill Was at the Docks in Toronto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Met the man himself!

    Pretty calm guy!

  108. Green Screen of Death by Uttles · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Tricky move by MS. All the time I was predicting that people were going to get all excited about the Xbox and then they would be greeted with the blue screen of death, but MS fooled us all, it's now green! Haha!

    I beleive an "I told you so" is called for here.

    --

    ~ now you know
  109. Salons review.. by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

    Ok, this entire review is a giant contradiction of ideals. First, the guy seems to rank of Microsoft for trying to control everything everywhere with its operating system. "Internet Explorer of the Game world". IMMEDIATLY after that, he ranks on the fact that Microsoft has secured no incredible new games, and are simply presenting the same lackluster games that everyone else has..

    So answer me this. Why is that their job?? They provide the platform, and for ONCE in their lives actually try to provide developers, in this case, GAME developers, a platform they can flurish on without locking shackles on them, and they get yelled at for NOT doing EXACTLY WHAT EVERYONE COMPLAINS ABOUT??

    Talk about your catch22 no win situations..

    Hands down, the XBox has more capabilities then the PS2 does. You simply cant argue with the numbers. Does the PS2 have a better developer following, which hence, utilize the hardware better? Hands down, yes. But for crying out loud, that doesnt mean that the entire platform is a peice of crap.

    I bet some of these guys saying how crappy of a platform it is are the SAME ones drooling over the GeForce 3 cards, that actually have LESS capabilities then this beast does..

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    1. Re:Salons review.. by kindbud · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even Microsoft knows that you must first get the rope around their neck, before pulling the noose tight.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:Salons review.. by kz45 · · Score: 0

      why??

      Because Microsoft is going to win the console war, by coming out with a BETTER console?

      if their console is better than the rest, and people are using it, they deserve to have the control.

    3. Re:Salons review.. by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

      Unfortionatly, they would have a hard time tightening the noose around a HARDWARE platform. I'll agree with you the moment some Microsoft employee comes knocking at my door, demanding to upgrade some chips inside my XBox. In the meantime, the box is out of their control.. 8-)

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  110. great center by Erris · · Score: 1
    The problem here is that people instantly lambash the box without thinking of the ramifications- It's a strong PC with great graphics. In the living room. The centerpiece of the family community.

    Umm, it's the ramifications that bother people. No one really cares too much about the sub standard, non standard, hardware.

    Fireplace > Radio > TV > M$ borg box. It's not evolution. I don't plan this or any other game console as the "center" of my family space. Technology should be unobtrusive and helpful. The X-Box is just another game, with M$ spy hooks. No thanks. I'm going to do better with systems with voice recognition, message relaying from internet so I can talk to my mom in another town, and basic home automation with security. M$ has not and will not deliver.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:great center by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      "I'm going to do better with systems with voice recognition"

      Um, XBox is also the first system to include a bonefide headset in the works for talking to other game players during games. I assume that voice recognition is just around the corner.

  111. Purple? Gimme! by iainl · · Score: 1

    I'm buying the purple Gamecube, myself. Its such a nicer colour than green. Sony's idea of limited-edition differenty coloured PS2s sounds cool as well.

    (insert obligatory Drazi joke here).

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  112. Xbox Soundtrack by Wedman · · Score: 1

    This Xbox soundtrack will havave you playing for hours. :P

  113. Play PC games on PCs dang it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to say it, but it looks like a lot of people are gonna be spending $300 on a gimped PC this season. Guys, if you wanna play PC games, play them on your PC. A year from now, the X-Box is just gonna be one huge PC port magnet.

    If you want a game console, get a GameCube or PS2. Both systems have strong backings. The GameCube is not just a kiddie machine...it's carrying all the upcomming Resident Evil games among other definately mature titles. You also get Nintendo's backing and games like Metroid and Zelda. Pick up a PS2 if you want a broad library of games and tons of RPG's. Just don't fall victim to the X-Box. No, gaming's NOT all about the MHZ and even if it was all about processor speed, you can't compare a pentium chip to a RISC processor through numbers. Heck, can't compare chips based on MHZ regardless, look at AMD right now.

    Will I eventually get an X-Box? Probably. But that'll be two years from now when they're on clerance and then only to play the next Panzer Dragoon game...::drool::

  114. Why we should buy the XBox by frankie · · Score: 2

    Remember that like most game systems, the console is sold at a loss, which the manufacturer recoups via game licensing fees. Microsoft loses at least $100 for every XBox they sell, with the red ink expected to approach $1 billion over the next 3 years.

    So, all the M$ haters here have a simple choice -- buy an XBox. Buy several. Turn it into a PVR / mp3 Jukebox / file server. At $299 it's a nice piece of hardware.

    1. Re:Why we should buy the XBox by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

      Remember that like most game systems, the console is sold at a loss, which the manufacturer recoups via game licensing fees. Microsoft loses at least $100 for every XBox they sell, with the red ink expected to approach $1 billion over the next 3 years.

      And remember than Nintendo makes a profit on their consoles.

      Plus the xBox is apparently Linux-friendly.

      Time to use that 9gig drive and run an Apache web server in your dorm room!

      Just say Bill G sent you, and thank him for the $100.

      If it ain't broke, hack it ...

      -

      --
      --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  115. Green screen of death? by madenosine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is simply an error message, and the problem is clearly handled. Would it be better if they did not inform the user that something is wrong at all and have it actually crash because of a bad executable?

    1. Re:Green screen of death? by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      How about making something that doesn't crash or fall apart at all. That happens a log in the non-PC world.

    2. Re:Green screen of death? by madenosine · · Score: 1

      You have missed the point completely.

    3. Re:Green screen of death? by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      "You have missed the point completely.

      No, you have missed the point completely! In the PC world people have come to accept bugs and error messages. As a programmer it disgusts me that it's so common place. You don't get that in other areas. Would you get an error message on your blender, your TV, your VCR? They just work because companies put the time in to make sure problems don't occur. If they do occur it's incredibly rare.

      The computer industry reminds me of the Car industry and planned obsolescence. People are shocked that you can create something with very little chance of breaking.

    4. Re:Green screen of death? by madenosine · · Score: 1

      First off, I could not have missed the point completely if I had the first post. Second, only one of the devices you listed requires somewhat modern input, which is the VCR. The VCR, however, uses analog input. This error is apparently caused because of input, most likely the disk in it.

      IMO, the most likely cause is a scratched disk. When I put a scratched disk into my Dreamcast, it simply does not accept user input as it tries over and over again to see what is on the disk. Would there be something wrong in letting the user know that the disk is scratched, and it cannot read a necessary file?

      Obviously, the error could be because of something else, but it should be apparent that it is probably still accepting user input. There is no reason to assume that the X-Box has crashed from the picture.

    5. Re:Green screen of death? by SirEdward · · Score: 1

      First off, I could not have missed the point completely if I had the first post. Second, only one of the devices you listed requires somewhat modern input, which is the VCR. The VCR, however, uses analog input. This error is apparently caused because of input, most likely the disk in it.

      And how, pray tell, is the Xbox any more complicated than a vcr when it comes to taking user input? Every input you can give to the Xbox, AFAIK, is pre-set: you select from a list, so there should be no chance for the user to enter erroneous input and any problems that occur are related to the software or, as you said, faulty/damaged hardware.

      Obviously, the error could be because of something else, but it should be apparent that it is probably still accepting user input. There is no reason to assume that the X-Box has crashed from the picture.

      Right and wrong. You're right in that you can't tell what caused the "green screen" in the picture, but wrong in assuming that it's still taking user input. I've often found that, even though it has "OK" and "CANCEL" options available, Windows will often ignore them when it's in BSOD mode... that aside, once again, there's no way to tell from the picture what the exact situation is

  116. huh?? by Pengo · · Score: 2

    Wow, those are some future thinking statements.

    I would love to have a hard drive if that meant I could store lots of game save data without having to spend lots extra on solid state storage devices that just can't hack it.

    Why would I not want to have caching of data on a hard drive rather than have to constantly hit the cd rom drive? Geez.. caching would be fantastic and most games would benifit from this.

    Ethernet would be great for anyone that has a broadband connection. I would love to play GT3 with people on the internet. Would I want to play Halo on the internet with lots of people? hell yah.

    geez man.. Maybe xbox doesn't fit your personal needs but your arguments are pretty pathetic.

    1. Re:huh?? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      One thing to worry about with the HD, tho':

      Let's say I'm developing Spankman III: Out of Tissue and I've got some cross-promotional stuff going on with Kleenex and I have to ship by December 12th. It's November 15 and I'm not done.

      Without a hard drive, I have to wait to ship until I'm done.

      With a hard drive I can ship, even if the thing is still in beta because I can ask you - the player - to download patches later.

      The Xbox means one thing to me: PC developers' bad habits can now follow them over to the console environment.

      Bad idea.

    2. Re:huh?? by angelo · · Score: 1

      Why would I not want to have caching of data on a hard drive rather than have to constantly hit the cd rom drive? Geez.. caching would be fantastic and most games would benifit from this.

      Sarcasm aside, but the X-Box in the store that I saw took 1.5 minutes to load the 'Munch' demo. Methinks no caching is happening there.

    3. Re:huh?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      actually, the entire executable must rest on the DVD. The HDD is nothing more than a data cache and memory unit (for savegames, mp3s etc.)

    4. Re:huh?? by tc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except that MS has to certify all titles before they can ship, so developers can't just put out shovelware without MS approval. And I can't see MS approving broken titles as it would damage the reputation of the console.

  117. First they knockoff the OS X, now the showmanship by starshinecruzer · · Score: 1

    Microsoft just isn't capable of anything original, are they. I was reading about the pathetic Steve Ballmer X-Box monkeyboy spectacular when I realized that all this showmanship is just another cheap attempt to rip-off Apple.
    First the Graphical Interface (yes, I know Apple ripped if off from Xerox, so that isn't quite as evil), but then they see OS X come out so Microsoft shovels out a steaming load of Windows XP a year later. Now, after seeing Steve Job's charismatic presentations of new Apple technology stimulating interest in their products, Ballmer pathetically tries to replicate it by dancing around frenetically on a stage ordering developers to new heights of "creativity". That company is a leech, and the scariest kind: one that has grown bigger than the body it leeches from.

  118. X-Box? Bleh by DragonPup · · Score: 2

    I got my copy of Metal Gear Solid 2 yesterday(odd how it was released right before the Xbox and GameCube launch), and it kicks some major ass. I have yet to see any X-Box game from the demos in stores, or movies released to the web that is as good looking as MGS2.

    And I can shoot seagulls's with the PSG1! It's surprisingly satisfying.

    Back on the subject, other than what MS bought, I barely see any developer support for them at all. And to make matters worse, the X-Box is HUGE. And if I understand correctly, in Japan, small is good cause apartments tend to be on the small side, but maybe the Japanese version folds out to become a coffee table that keeps your drinks warm as it overheats?

    If I want to play Halo, I'll get it for the PC or Mac.

    Now if I could figure out how to get into Shell 2 without dying....

    -Henry

    --
    "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    1. Re:X-Box? Bleh by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Amen, brother! MGS2 is far and away the best game I've played in a long, long time. The production values are incredible, the detail is phenomenal and I love leaving nudie magazines behind for the commando search teams to ogle *grin*

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  119. There is more to it than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When one buys something one must consider the ramefications. Sure they may be playing nice now, but we know from their past history that once they gain a monopoly they become nasty. One cannont separate one section of MS from the other. They are all inherently evil because they attempt to make the world over in their own image.

    Arguing that using the "best tool for the job" is stupid because it does not consider the ramaficaitons of our actions. If people would stop and think about what they are doing instead of looking for instant gratification, maybe we wouldn't be in such a mess.

    1. Re:There is more to it than that by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

      And what mess would that be? Are you saying we should always use 'The most ethically correct tool for the job'? Whos ethics are we to follow? Yours? Mine? Who knows. I see nothing wrong etically with buying an XBox. Bring it up to an ethical issue is silly. Is Sony of all people 'more ethically sound' then Microsoft? Cripes no. Is Sega? Nope. Does Greenpeace make a gaming console? Please, explain further..

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  120. Kind of funny... by IsleOfView · · Score: 2

    I saw an X-Box demo machine at Wal-Mart the other day with Munch's odysee on it (The Oddworld series was one of my favorites on the PS1). Believe it or not (I think you will), the machine was totally locked up....My PS1 and PS2 have *never* locked up on me before....

    1. Re:Kind of funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your PS or PS2 has never locked up? Is that because you've never actually turned them on? All console systems have games that crash. Except in the case of overheating and hardware failure, it's not the consoles fault because all the console does is turn complete control over to the game image. If you want to read about the reliability of PS2, check out the stories of the Japanese launch. Corrupting memory cards that destroyed the DVD software. Couldn't operate long enough to watch a DVD movie before overheating and crashing. How about Dreamcast? Shipments of games incorrectly burned by some factories, unplayable. Playstation? What's that about Gran Turismo 2 being hurried to make release but they forgot to remove the planned tracks from the list so you can actually get to that bonus level? No console is sacred, and as long as humans are programming the games, they will always crash.

  121. Picked mine up this morning by Red+Avenger · · Score: 1

    I picked up my Xbox this morning from the local Babbages and played it for about 2 hours so far. I will only comment on Halo (thats all I have played so far). All I can say is wow. This is the most impressive game I have seen come out in a very long time. Visually the game is stunning. Absolutely gorgeous. The music is kinda creepy but really sucked me in. Its almost like Virtual Reality. I was totally immersed in the Halo world. Before I knew it my alarm rang and I had to go to work. I can't wait play it again tonight.

    So far so good. No crashes, and it loaded really quick as well.

  122. Re:A PC in dressup? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well of course the Xbox is a PC in dressup! That is what will be so great about it. Writing a game for a PC that has fixed hardware allows for so much more latitude than what is available today.

    All these people bashing Xbox simply because it is MS might be in for a big surprise. If I remeber correctly, at launch, the PS2 was nothing but hype. The games didn't even look as good as Dreamcast. But things change as a platform matures. I'll reserve judgement until then...

    Chris

  123. Civilization 3 by Wind_Walker · · Score: 1
    This is a bit off-topic, but you brought it up: Civilization III is by far the most addictive video game that I have ever played. It even outranks Civilization I, in my opinion. You'll find yourself up until 3 AM playing "Just one more turn" on Civ 3.

    If you have a wife, I would think twice before buying it... that, or get yourself a good counsellor.

  124. Other reviews by Rushuru · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a few links to other and may be more objective reviews

    Zdnet
    Gamespy
    Gamespot
    FiringSquad
    TeamXBox
    Yahoo 2 3

    --
    "Can I run a linux cluster of those?"

    --
    !
    ^_^
    1. Re:Other reviews by slim · · Score: 2

      > Here's a few links to other and may be more objective reviews:

      Yup, I'm listening...

      > TeamXBox [teamxbox.com]

      Err, objective? (I'm sure the rest were OK)

    2. Re:Other reviews by denise-eliza · · Score: 1

      Did you just write, without a hint of irony, that teamxbox.com is objective? That's like saying, "That apple.com review of XP is complete bull, look at the one at microsoft.com, it's much more balanced."

  125. Hardware=irrelevant, Games=the whole point by DThorne · · Score: 1

    Part of the problem is that both the dissers and the pro-XBox people miss the point - the subject of my message. Dreamcast had great hardware - where is it now? The *vast* majority of end users of these products care not a whit about specs - they just want games on it that they enjoy playing. Only time will tell if Gates et al get that point and manage to attract designers of the same magnitude as Nintendo does. The fact that MS seemed to focus more on hardware than software doesn't bode well for them, since they're the new kid on the block. However, as much as I'm not a big MS fan, they're not entirely stupid - I'm sure that now the hardware footprint has been established they're focusing on attracting those developers.

    DThorne

    1. Re:Hardware=irrelevant, Games=the whole point by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      The Dreamcast had great games too. People just don't want anything original. They want dumbass sequels. You can have this and more in a PS2.

    2. Re:Hardware=irrelevant, Games=the whole point by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >The Dreamcast had great games too. People just don't want anything
      >original. They want dumbass sequels. You can have this and more in a
      >PS2.
      >
      And just what is Ico for the PS2 a sequel to?

  126. Max Payne is on X-Box by Kletus+Cassidy · · Score: 2

    i'm buying; civ3, dark ages of camelot, max payne (which i still haven't played),

    Max Payne is on the X-Box

    Here's the Max Payne trailer (Windows Media Player required).

    1. Re:Max Payne is on X-Box by big_cat79 · · Score: 1

      While browsing Amazon yesterday, I saw Max Payne will be on the PSX2 as well.

      --

      BigCat79

      "The dead have risen and are voting Republican!" --Bart Simpson
  127. The REAL question is... by Hitokage_Nishino · · Score: 1

    Can you run linux on it?

  128. How does it play DVD's? by kemster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This may be a stupid question, but how does it play DVD movies? I mean, obviously it has a DVD-ROM, but where does the software to play it come from? Do you need a boot CD to load up the OS/player, then you swap in the DVD? Or is there a small Windows OS on the hard disk itself that contains a player? If there's a Windows OS on the HD, what's stopping the natural corruption of some DLL's and the player breaking?

    1. Re:How does it play DVD's? by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      This is a good question. I haven't seen anything about it. One reason I bought the PS2 this christmas instead of others is to play DVD movies.

    2. Re:How does it play DVD's? by FatRatBastard · · Score: 4, Informative

      From what I understand you have to buy an extra DVD remote control to unlock the DVD feature. I think all the firmware is built into the base unit, but it needs the IR dongle to be plugged into a controler port to make it function. I guess the Remote is only $30 so its not that bad. Kinda crappy to make you buy one thought (admittedly the DVD on the PS2 is better with a remote.. no wires hanging around. But at least you can use it without one)

    3. Re:How does it play DVD's? by ForceFactor1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The remote comes with a software upgrade as well. Their claim right now is that DVD playback was disabled by default to avoid paying DVD licensing fees. The licensing fee is then made up for by purchasing the $30 remote.

    4. Re:How does it play DVD's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be getting your hopes up about DVD playback - sure it will playback DVDs, but only at 480i. It won't do de-interlacing to 480p nor will it scale to any other resolutions like 720p or 1080i. The hardware can do it - the MPAA won't let them.

    5. Re:How does it play DVD's? by Hidyman · · Score: 1

      I've read that it is on par with any medium priced Progressive scan DVD player. That almost justifies the price right there. ___

      --
      You can't take the sky from me ...
    6. Re: How does it play DVD's? by SteveX · · Score: 2

      I've been wondering about this - it's my only reason for holding off on purchasing an Xbox.

      I want to be able to use it as a progressive scan DVD player. The hardware can do it, but Microsoft has chosen not to make this feature available to me.

      My reasoning is this: Progressive-scan DVD players are expensive (average about $500), and with the Xbox being around $299, many people would buy the Xbox instead of a dedicated progressive-scan player.

      If Microsoft is really selling the Xbox at a loss and making the money back on games, then having people buy it to use it as a DVD player with no intention of ever buying games would be bad.

      Anyway, since the hardware can do it, I'm hoping someone (Intervideo? Cyberlink?) will come out with a software DVD player that works in the non-interlaced mode. It's certainly possible.

      (Oh and then there's the other issue of there being no VGA output available.. anyone have a link to someone selling an adapter?)

      - Steve

    7. Re:How does it play DVD's? by newbiescum · · Score: 1

      Except it isn't progressive which kinda defeats the whole comparision.

    8. Re: How does it play DVD's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get ready for more depressing news.
      About a week after MS told everyone about using the 8GB HDD instead of the 10GB (no real big deal), they announced that the Xbox would no longer include Progressive Scan.

    9. Re: How does it play DVD's? by SteveX · · Score: 2

      Yeah but the hardware can do it. Think about it. DVD data is just data on a disk, software can read it - and software can set the display mode to 480p (progressive-scan). So a completely software solution could enable progressive-scan DVD.

      - Steve

  129. uh why? by bliss · · Score: -1

    "Can I play pong on it? If Not why not?"

    why would you want to do that maybe I missed the joke?

    --
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    1. Re:uh why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      bliss, you must learn to become one with your manhood. Truly great rewards await you at the palace of snafu.

      Eat plenty of beefy noodles and your manhood will grow big and strong. All the ladies will gaze upon it with mighty envy. You will be the man.

      In the sky, there is no room for the nonsense of crack whores. Your mission is to plug up any holes in these whores you may find with your sizable pecker. Remember to use the fun coffee filters to mop up any leaky stuff from the lovely holes.

      All is happy to be here in Slashdot for your learning of how to be a pimp daddy. Having the fun!

    2. Re:uh why? by bliss · · Score: -1

      thanks I'll keep that in mind

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    3. Re:uh why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really I tink I am more qualified about covert operations than anyone. They want to play dirty, you play dirty. If they natzi's try to threaten you. You get together with a group of people and kill some natzis. Simple. An eye for an eye.

  130. I might get one by cecil36 · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft or a third party develops a Tetris game for the system and some decent RPG is also developed.

    1. Re:I might get one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tetris world puzzle is announced.

      dude, MORROWIND!

  131. My take on the whole thing by jeffc128ca · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have always liked the editors at Salon and this time is no exception.

    What Xbox has going for it...
    1 - PS2 is known as a more adult gaming platform. I just bought a PS2 and finding games for my 9 year old daughter is interesting. Maby MS can capitalize it if they are smart.

    2 - Should be easy to port PC games to it. Something lacking in PS2/Nintindo worlds.

    What Xbox has going against it....
    1 - Sony rules the console market right now. Hands down. Nintendo has some a good new platform and more kiddy friendly games. Xbox has to compete with this

    2 - Microsoft is used to being able to do what they want because they have a Monopoly. How will management react to situations when they are the small guy. It's like General Moters starting to offer blenders. They are not experts and the people the people who have been making them know a lot more about it and actually listen to there customers.

    3 - Lack of vision. Ties into #2. Where's the killer app? Do you really think Gates and Balmer can envision great new games.

    4 - Game makers won't produce for a console that hasn't got a proven track record. Why spend millions developing a game for a potential 50 people when I can do it for tens of millions across the world (PS2).

    5 - Blue/Green screen of death will put off gamers. I bought a PS2 so I could get away from computer gaming and costant error messages and rebooting. When has anyone ever seen an error message on a Playstation or a Nintendo? I want drop in a game and play it never seeing an error message. PC users are use to getting them and can live with it. Console games don't and won't tolerate it. I gave up PC gaming because I got sick of upgrading video cards, getting more hard drive space, better processors. I just want to drop that disc in and play the game.

    6 - The goofy Balmer/Monkey/music crap that the Salon article talked about. If you have to dance around on stage and talk like a motivational speaker your not selling stuff in the console market. When Grand Theft III is released or the next version of Final Fantasy they don't even need to air a commercial. They could send it to the stores and put it on the shelf without a word and it will sell out. Microsoft ain't cool. Sony is, Nintendo is some what.

    I could go on and on. I can't see Xbox being anything but a niche market. Microsoft bit off more than they can chew with this one.

    1. Re:My take on the whole thing by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      To add to this if Xbox tanks it will be fun to watch the fall out at MicroSoft. Like watching a fish out of water gasping for water...

    2. Re:My take on the whole thing by Ryan_Terry · · Score: 1
      5 - Blue/Green screen of death will put off gamers. I bought a PS2 so I could get away from computer gaming and costant error messages and rebooting. When has anyone ever seen an error message on a Playstation or a Nintendo? I want drop in a game and play it never seeing an error message. PC users are use to getting them and can live with it. Console games don't and won't tolerate it. I gave up PC gaming because I got sick of upgrading video cards, getting more hard drive space, better processors. I just want to drop that disc in and play the game.

      I don't really see this as a valid argument.

      First - Does anyone else remember the days of PS games just hanging in the middle of a 95 yd. touchdown run because they had tiny scratches. OR does anyone remember blowing into old NES cartriages because all they would do is turn on with a black, blue, or multicolored screen. PC's are not the only environment that has problems. I see the PC as being a hell of a lot more informative when there is a problem.

      Second - I hate to hear the garbage about more hard drive space and better video cards. It seems to me that every year there is a new $499 gaming console coming out that will be better than ever and will outdo everything we have ever seen. I spend a lot less than that on computer hardware I'll tell you that. I also have the ability to do much more with my PC than game. So in my opinion the money I am spending is a much better investment.

      --
      MessEdUp
      .sig
      #/var/www/v
    3. Re:My take on the whole thing by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      I don't really see this as a valid argument.


      It's not only valid, it's the biggest problem with PC games. I spent years thinking I didn't need a gaming console becuase I had a PC. And I put up with constant bugs, patches, and upgrading on my PC just so I could play a game I just bought.

      What sold me on gaming consoles was when the PS2 first came out and said it was downward compatible. I gave up all the arguments about why PC games are still good with my console friends when that happened. All the titles I play on my PC are on the PS2. I would like to get Mario games on it bo so be it. After over 10 years of playing games on PC's I can be free of the software driver hunt and debating buying a new video card just to play the sequal to a game I love.

      If you think it's not a valid argument go and stand in an electronics store and as every body who purchases a console if they played PC games and ask them why they are buying a console. You will get the same answer.

    4. Re:My take on the whole thing by big_cat79 · · Score: 1

      1 - PS2 is known as a more adult gaming platform. I just bought a PS2 and finding games for my 9 year old daughter is interesting. Maby MS can capitalize it if they are smart.

      Generally, of the three main console offerings right now, Nintendo offers the most kid friendly titles, notably Pokemon. So perhaps that would be a better option for your daughter.

      I wouldn't be surprised if either Sony or Microsoft buys out Nintendo for it's games and franchises. Despite lagging behind somewhat on the hardware, Nintendo, IMHO, has the biggest, most recognizable game franchises ever in Mario Bros., Zelda, Metroid, and Pokemon. Either of these companies would do well to step when Nintendo falters (I hope not - I grew up on the NES) and leverage their titles against the other system. That is what sells consoles: the games that are only available on one platform.

      --

      BigCat79

      "The dead have risen and are voting Republican!" --Bart Simpson
    5. Re:My take on the whole thing by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but wasn't the XBOX supposed to be aimed more at the older audience (even compared to PS2)? It's got the PC crossover potential, adult oriented ads (sort of), and even oversized controllers for adult hands.

      But now the range of products out for PS2 seems to make it the more interesting choice for adult gamers. Factor in the relatively high correlation between adult gamers and /. geeks, and the XBOX may have a problem here...

    6. Re:My take on the whole thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think Gates and Balmer can envision great new games.

      Do you really think that Gates and Ballmer are going to sit around designing games for this thing in the first place? They've got bigger fish to fry than deciding what Microsoft's next video game title is going to be. I doubt they even factor into the process much. It's not like Microsoft has just one big department that's headed by those two. Do you think that the CEO of Sony sits around coming up with ideas for PS2 games?

    7. Re:My take on the whole thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want great games that your kid can play, buy a GameCube (or even an N64, they must be pretty cheap now-a-days and have tons of games.)

      And you'll be getting the same games as XBox, only with better first party games from retro/rare/N/etc.

      Or ... just buy them all. Then no one would have the excuse to be a fanatic about any system! :-)

  132. You're not looking in the right places, then. by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

    Have you witnessed Metal Gear Solid 2? Absolutely one of the most riveting games, ever. My wife (who normally detests any videogame other than Bejeweled) is now addicted to watching me play! It's that engrossing...

    Devil May Cry is also the game that every 3D version of Castlevania has ever tried to be. Give it a play and tell me you're not impressed and I'll kindly give you a whap with the closest handy LARP.

    Gran Turismo 3 not impressive? Guess that depends on if you like driving games or not.

    How about Tony Hawk 3? Great game. Splashdown? No? How about SSX Tricky, the first game to ship with in-game DTS 5.1 support?

    Methinks you need to expand your horizons a bit.

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    1. Re:You're not looking in the right places, then. by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

      Errrm, LART, rather. (LARP == Live Action Role Playing. LART == Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool). Been reading Player vs. Player too much lately, I guess.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    2. Re:You're not looking in the right places, then. by Tantrum420 · · Score: 1

      Ummm... When I rented NHL 2k2, it made the pretty blue light come on on my reciever. But then again, it may have been Dolby 5.1 and not DTS 5.1. That was a little over a month ago. I'm not sure when Tricky shipped but I don't think it was before that.

  133. Salon investors and editorial slant... by jea6 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "Just six weeks after receiving a resuscitation investment worth $2.5 million from Bill Hambrecht and Adobe Systems founder John Warnock, Salon secured an additional $750,000 from a group of investors led by former HBO head Michael Fuchs." (http://main.travelwriters.com/articles/view.asp?a rticleID=68) Fuchs is the former head of HBO, part of the AOL Time Warner conglomerate, and is now a Salon Board Member.

    Also part of that investor group was Wasserstein Perella Group, Inc., which has done M&A transactions for AOL (http://www.wassersteinperella.com/about/transacti ons.htm).

    It's a stretch, but not a BIG stretch. AND this is off 10 minutes of research.

    --

    sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    1. Re:Salon investors and editorial slant... by Indomitus · · Score: 1

      Would you mind explaining how exactly this is evidence of an editorial slant? Not to knock your research or anything but this doesn't seem to indicate any kind of bias. A board member used to work for a company that was part of AOLTimeWarner? How would this produce any slant? AOLTimeWarner is a huge company, you'd be hard pressed to find anyone in the entertainment industry that hasn't done some work for some subsidiary of AOLTW at one time or another.

    2. Re:Salon investors and editorial slant... by jea6 · · Score: 2
      The slant comes from the fact that AOLTW is a competitor of Microsoft. In the entertainment arena as well as the computing arena. AOL has made it long known that they want console access to the home entertainment center, whereas Microsoft now has three inroads: WebTV (not much), and X-Box (much more intersting). Microsoft is also partnered with DirectTV for "Ultimate TV". So, the slant comes from investors (with bail-out money, really) who have ties to the competitor of a product reviewed. This is the inevitable conflict of interest when entertainment and reporting collide. In this day and age it is critical to consider the source and consider the source's motives. Because healthy skepticism is more importanct than it has ever been.

      AOLTimeWarner is a huge company, you'd be hard pressed to find anyone in the entertainment industry that hasn't done some work for some subsidiary of AOLTW at one time or another.

      You said it well. And that is why I always look for hints of editorial slant.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    3. Re:Salon investors and editorial slant... by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2

      Considerin the lion's share of the money was coming from Adobe, it would be interesting to see if there was a change in Salons stance of Skylarov before and after the cash infusion.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  134. This article is ridiculous by WildBeast · · Score: 1

    The author first blames XBox for not having enough good titles at it's release as he would like. Then he goes on telling how wonderfull the GameCube is and talking about a strategy game for the console.
    I went out to get myself an Xbox but they were all sold out but I'll get one sooner or later. I'm sure that Dead or Alive 3, Halo, Madden 2002 and Munch's Oddysse are all great games. That's enough to occupy me for a very long time.
    As for the article, it's plain FUD. The guy is probably paid by Sony.

  135. Just to let you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's "lambast" not "lambash". It means exactly what you think, but ends in a 't', not an 'h'.

  136. Why a Pentium? by PiGuy · · Score: 1

    XBox runs off a Pentium III, right? Why?!?!
    The last thing we need is segmented
    architechture in video game consoles. I guess
    Microsoft is planning to make Windows run on it
    or something. Or maybe Minesweeper.

    1. Re:Why a Pentium? by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be hilarious. The XBox on Pentium three and the most played game is Mineseeper and Freecell....

    2. Re:Why a Pentium? by Stackis · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite Microsoft games is DeFrag.....hell on a Win98 box w/a PII, you can actually start the game and you won't be done for a good 3 hours...

      --

      "Look where we worship" -- Jim Morrison
    3. Re:Why a Pentium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did Microsoft decide to use Intel's Pentium III? Well, actually, the x86 architecture was not their first option. They evaluated many architectures, and decided on x86 because it's familiar, and Intel because they offer some of the best code performance profiling tools, which is something game designers yearned for so that they could accurately pinpoint bottlenecks in their game algorithms. The XBox SDK comes with a customized Intel profiler.

  137. FPS thumbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GoldenEye, Turok and Perfect Dark all worked well on the console, because they were DESIGNED to be played on a console with a standard controller from the start.

    I played the N64 and PS in the store when they came out, and found the N64 controller much more natural to use. Plus I thought that having symbols on the 4 button pad was a bad move on Sony's part. Nintendo had a similar arrangement, but they were just referred to as C -Up, -Down, -Left or -Right. Much easier to grasp right off the bat than X, O, triangle and square.

    Whatever. I'm not a hardcore gamer, and am in no hurry to replace the n64: I stil haven't played all the cool games yet, and I can get them used for real cheap now!

    1. Re:FPS thumbs by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Regarding the symbols on the buttons...

      This makes sense to me, from an internationalization point of view. Not everyone is going to be able to recognize "A" - especially if your native written language doesn't use letters.

      However, even a 3 year old will know what a circle, square, triangle, and cross are - even if they use different words for them.

  138. lousy fucking bigots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I swear, some of us have put our hearts and souls into this thing, and some pissant little blog editor trashes it without even trying it once, all because it is MICROSOFT. what a fucking prick. It is so hard to love this site and participate when crap like this comes down the pike. what is this supposed to be, pandering to some imaginary grassroots anti X-box movement?


    development standpoint:
    the ps2 is a mess. it is a ridiculous and stupidly designed POS from the dev standpoint. Not to mention that Sony is every bit as ruthless and evil as MS has *ever* been, and suprisingly, sony is even more arrogant and useless for support than the xbox guys.


    game quality standpoint:
    The selection of ps2 games is comlpete crap. with a few exceptions of course- ssx and perhaps some of these new titles... but the near impossibility to get sufficient AA without giving up most of the textures or transforms... The visual quality is super lacking on ps2. everyone knows this too.


    game cube
    It is entirely likely that the Gamecube will be a superior product. That is not proof of the worthlessness of the xbox, merely proof of the capability of nintendo to produce.


    I can't believe people are just going to absorb this thoughtless withering criticism from a pinch lipped bitty like michael who probably doesn't even play games. I am just livid with outrage that these jerks have made such a soap box to spew their filthy unthinking bigotry from. You should all consider being ashamed for patronizing this site and encouraging this crap. I think I am going to throw up! for fucks sake, that article doesn't have one ounce of useful info in it, just gossip rag trashing about 'monkeyboy' which is a clear indication of how useless this coverage is and the bitterness that it is predicated on.

    Get a fucking clue and stfu michael. The rest of you, those that can see the forest for the trees anyway, should write michael, hemos, taco and roblimo and let them know that this crap is going to cost them their fucking jobs if it keeps up. FUCK.

  139. Gift for understatement... by GISboy · · Score: 1

    All I could think when I say the Gotham Racing commercial was "Need For Speed 2/3" with Voodoo2 acceleration.

    That is my observation/summation/knee jerk reaction.

    Innovation, hardly.
    Revolutionary..murrmph..snort..hahahaha.
    Interesting...ok, I'll admit I'm intrigued.
    Must have? Have not bought a console since the original Nintendo/discovering PC's...not going to start again unless I see a 50$ console and 5$ games.

    My Opinion, no more no less.

    --
    If it is not on fire, it is a software problem.
    1. Re:Gift for understatement... by Lord_Sy · · Score: 1


      Here in Argentina you have PS CDs for $5 (and can cost you less if you bring the blank CD). Of course, these only work on PS with mod chip. But, you can also have $5 CDs with ultimate PC games.

      That's the only way to fuck a monopoly, distributing for free what they charge for, and what should be very much cheaper.

      --
      --- "pero toda poesía es hostil al capitalismo"
  140. I expect Gamecube to win this war by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    PS2 is already dead, graphically its not even in the same league as Xbox or Gamecube, and Square and all their third parties are running to Gamecube and Xbox, PS2 is in the same situation as Dreamcast was in when PS2 Launched.

    Xbox, is very powerful, however Microsoft has done a very bad job in Marketing, and the games suck, not really a single good Xbox game except Halo and Xbox games look worse than Gamecube and some even on the Dreamcast/PS2 level.

    Gamecube seems to be the only System with revolutionary games, Good graphics, Great marketing, and Great price.

    Gamecube has the best graphics mainly because Nintendo was smart, they knew having 100 million polygons is useless if the polygons have ugly textures, so what they did is settled for maybe 12 million polygons with high quality textures and tons of special effects.

    So while Gamecube may not be able to render the polygons of Xbox or even PS2, the games look better because it can do more special effects, and the textures are such higher quality that Gamecube games look either like Cartoons, or they look so realistic that you'd think it was fully rendered on a super computer.

    Xbox is a very good machine hardware wise, but they need to take advantage of the power of Xbox in a way which matters, I dont want to see Xbox games with jaggies looking like a PS2 game, If Xbox has power, it should make games which simply cannot be done on any other system, Like Multiplayer RPGs, Games which let you completely edit them, Games which use the harddrive to store textures, sound, etc.

    Right now they are just using the DVD, and pixel for pixel, Gamecube absolutely destroys the Xbox in quality, what Xbox must do is use quantity, use more textures than gamecube, make big huge games which cant fit on a gamecube disk, take advantage of the ethernet for online gaming, and most importantly, use the pentium CPU for software based special effects than gamecube simply can never do.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:I expect Gamecube to win this war by DragonPup · · Score: 1

      I disagree to write off the PS2 like that. Graphically, MGS2 is one of the best looking games of all time. I haven't seen Final Fantasy X yet, so I am not sure how nice that looks. And I don't see any developers abandoning the PS2 for the GameCube or Xbox(unless MS buys them out, of course). Personally, I see the PS2 kicking some major butt cause they have great games out NOW and have been firmly entrenching themselves over the past year.

      Then again, both our arguements are based on speculation...

      -Henry

      --
      "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    2. Re:I expect Gamecube to win this war by HanzoSan · · Score: 1

      Well the same could have been said about Dreamcast when PS2 launched with no games.

      People dont buy systems for games, they buy over hype, over whats the most powerful, the best advertised, etc.

      Ps2 beat DC with no good games, just hype.

      Xbox will beat Ps2 for this same reason, Xbox is more powerful, Its Microsoft, has better marketing, etc.

      And Square did say they were going multi platform, Square was Sonys only exclusive developer, Sony has no one, not even Namco.

      Tekken 4 and Soul Caliber 2 coming to Gamecube, Final Fantasy coming to Xbox and Gamecube, Why get a PS2?

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:I expect Gamecube to win this war by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      "Ps2 beat DC with no good games, just hype"

      Bull, they had the thousands of PS1 games and the ability to play DVD movies. It was the first downard compatible game system. That's what did it.

    4. Re:I expect Gamecube to win this war by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. I have over 50 great Dreamcast games. The game library rocks! People just want shitty sequels. They can get that in their PS2.

      Think key words here. Sony and Playstation. I don't know why everyone loves their products so much.

    5. Re:I expect Gamecube to win this war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, Sony just bought a portion of SQUARE. Though they had intentions (square) of going cross-platform, now allied with Sony I doubt that will happen.
    6. Re:I expect Gamecube to win this war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the fucking press release from square you gimboid. They specifically state that this will in no way change the fact they will be going multi platform.

    7. Re:I expect Gamecube to win this war by dark_panda · · Score: 1

      I doubt you'll see Square running away from Sony any time soon. Sony just invested some 14 billion yen in Square, about 19% worth of the company's stocks, making them Square's second largest investor.

      J

  141. Classic Slashdot by PrimalChrome · · Score: 1

    1. Condemn anything created by Micro$oft (wasn't the $ catchy?)
    2. Pine over whether Linux will run on the hardware.
    3. Whine that Linux could have done it better.
    4. Quote a highly biased article from a rag of an online magazine. (the same magazine that recieved flak for it's poor content meer weeks ago)
    5. Put synth-blood in the water to whip up the zealots into a frenzy.

    Did I forget anything?

    1. Re:Classic Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget the hot grits and beowulf clusters

  142. Microsoft is clearly the industry leader... by mttlg · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...when it comes to error messages. That green-on-black look alone is "hip" and "trendy," but the attention to detail shows that Microsoft has put a lot of effort into making the user's error message experience an enjoyable one. In the future, I'm sure we can look forward to more "dynamic" and "interactive" error message paradigms from this "innovative" company.

  143. Re:First they knockoff the OS X, now the showmansh by WildBeast · · Score: 1

    Not happy with MS? Stick with your OS X and leave us, the majority, alone. I don't see how the XBox interface can look like OS X.

    Yes Apple ripped their GUI from Xerox and they ripped their code from BSD. Makes you wonder what their developers are doing.

  144. Hard drive by LordKariya · · Score: 1

    I would love to have a hard drive if that meant I could store lots of game save data without having to spend lots extra on solid state storage devices that just can't hack it.


    Psx had a tiny hard drive that plugged into the port in the back, providing a ton of extra storage space. I think the ports were removed in the "new" psxs. I haven't seen one for any system since, though.

    --
    I alternate between posting +5 and -1 Comments. Karma: +53 -47 = 6
  145. What an unbiased article... not. by osgeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think this line from the article says it best:

    So for the first time, I actually dared to entertain warm thoughts toward Microsoft.

    Yeah, no kidding that he doesn't normally like Microsoft. I would never have guessed it from the consistently cynical tone of his article.

    I'm no big fan of MS either, but jeez. Would a little unbiased journalistic integrity be appropriate? Hmm.

    As it is, I don't think that I know anything more about how good the XBox is after reading the article than I did beforehand -- because I don't even begin to trust the opinions of the journalist with his obvious baggage of preconceptions.

    1. Re:What an unbiased article... not. by ChaosDiscordSimple · · Score: 1

      because I don't even begin to trust the opinions of the journalist with his obvious baggage of preconceptions.

      Darn straight, I prefer my journalists preconceptions and editorial slants to be carefully hidden, allowing to me continue living in my fantasy land where if I can't see the editorial slant, it must not be there.

  146. Microsoft is irrelevant. by oGMo · · Score: 2

    Admittedly, I am biased against Microsoft. I want them to fail. So what? Objectivity is impossible for anyone, and at least I'm honest about my bias.

    But all that doesn't matter. (Mostly.) The XBOX gets so much criticism, not because it's Microsoft, but because it really does suck. There's nothing it has that a stale PC from a year or more ago doesn't, or couldn't with a little money. The games are mediocre at best, the hardware is crap, and thus few console gamers show interest. The fact it's Microsoft is just the cherry on the icing of this fruitcake.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:Microsoft is irrelevant. by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 1

      You're a liar and an idiot. The hardware is (objectively) superior. And what you monkeys don't seem to understand is that this console is _brand_ new. The games for PS2 sucked when it was released too.

      Damn monkeys.

    2. Re:Microsoft is irrelevant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is one thing an Xbox has that a 'stale PC from a year of more ago' doesn't have. Sure, it's just a 700MHz proc, and a really damn nicely optimized GF3 (just try to find one of those for the PC, you'll be sorely dissapointed), but it is a CONSOLE, not a PC. A PC is designed to do a little bit of everything, and do it reasonably well. Consoles are designed to GAME. Not do word processing, or (non-graphics related) number crunching. Just GAMING. They've optimized the shit out of the hardware in that thing, so the 700MHz Pentium and optimized GF3 in that thing can EASILY compete with the P4-2GHz or AthlonXP.

      Just because the processor is 'slow' doesn't mean the system is. Optimization is key.

    3. Re:Microsoft is irrelevant. by keefebert · · Score: 1

      The key here that this system is designed to be a standard. When a gaming company decides to put out a game, they need to make sure it works on a variety of systems, including my PIII 450. With MS, they have a 700mhz processor with a GF3, and every gaming company can make a game that exploits all of that technology. And yes, it's new, give it some time. If it fails, then you can be happy that MS took a hit, but if it doesn't, then the world has another great gaming console. Also, maybe the problem here is the idae that everything MS makes sucks. Maybe you don't like their business practices, or their software, hardware, or whatever, but a lot of people use, and a lot of people use it well. People need to think about where we would all be withour MS. I know you don't like to think about that, but they help jump start this industry and make computers available to all.

    4. Re:Microsoft is irrelevant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      700 mhz... slower than donkey shit

      this machine:
      1.4ghz athlon
      512mb ram
      GF2 Ultra

      if i can't game at 1280x1024 smoothly i don't want it

    5. Re:Microsoft is irrelevant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well and this is the point ms don't grok.
      They put in hdtv, dolby-surround harddrives etc, etc. But no FUN games and an extreme pricetag.

  147. No. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Couldn't the same be said about Sony with the Playstation

    No. The ps1 was not gigantic, and it was not widely hated. That's what the poster was saying, that the Xbox was hated and ridiculed. People were obsessing over the PS1 for a long time before it came out.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:No. by bonk · · Score: 1

      I don't recall many people having a Ps1 when they first came out... $300 for a console system was a LOT back in the days and only the rich college kids had em. Or a Saturn.

      --
      I hope to die peacefully in my sleep like grandpa, not screaming like his passengers.
  148. Your an idiot by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

    some of us have put our hearts and souls into this thing
    So you work for MS?

    the ps2 is a mess. it is a ridiculous and stupidly designed POS from the dev standpoint

    The games look damn fine to me and work very well. Incredible graphics. Why don't you elaberate. Or can you?

    The selection of ps2 games is comlpete crap

    Many thousands of game titles for both I and II don't meet your expectations. And how many does Xbox have, or Nintendo for that matter. Do you actually get and venture into a store that sells games?

    I can't believe people are just going to absorb this thoughtless withering criticism from a pinch lipped bitty like michael who probably doesn't even play games

    As apposed to a foul mouthed bitter looser such as yourself. Get real....

    1. Re:Your an idiot by tt2k1 · · Score: -1

      Nice hissy-fit, kid. How old are you? Maybe twelve? Have you learned to count yet? Can you count how many spelling and grammatical errors there are in your post? You know, the post in which you try to call someone an idiot? LOL...

      --

      Troll Tuesday 2001.

      --The Mess

  149. One Time Word Nazi by crisco · · Score: 2
    lambash isn't a word. You might have intended to use lambast, although bash would have worked just as well.

    Otherwise, some good points but there are some holes. Dreamcast was much the same, although a slower computer a few years back. And they didn't do anything with that advantage.

    --

    Bleh!

    1. Re:One Time Word Nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doubtless you also criticise Shakespeare for occasionally using hapax legomena. If the word hadn't been sullied by Microsoft I'd call that innovation.

  150. Re:For a different perspective...about xbox music by talonyx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Do you honestly give a fuck if your music is pirated? This is slashdot! We all use Audiogalaxy or Morpheus or whathaveyou to get our music and we don't give a fuck about recording artists.

    Really, when you look at it, they get to have lots of fun and tons of free sex. Do they really need money from us, too? Fuck them!

  151. From Dictionary.com by RageMachine · · Score: 2, Funny

    GSOD (G'S'O'D)

    GSOD: A acronym for defining the Green Screen Of Death. Invented by Microsoft Corp, in 2001.
    This is what is displayed when the XBox(R) crashes, and fails to load media. Mostly requiring a power cycle.

    Also See Evil Empire

    --

    --------------------------
    Is this a sig?
    --------------------------
  152. My impressions (Actually bought one) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought one of these last night because I wanted to. I made my decision off of the good reviews and the bad reviews but mainly because I wanted to.

    For a company who has never been in the game console industry I have to say I`ve been impressed so far with the few hours I`ve had to play on it at home. I bought Halo, as well as Madden 2002. Like someone said above, I`ve also noticed the few little paused in Halo while it loads the new screen, but by no means did it take away the feel of the game which even after playing many FPS's I genuinely liked. I didn`t know what to expect playing a FPS on a game controller but they did a really good job with the conversion and the pinpoint control you have with a mouse is even there. Madden 2002 is taking some getting used to but I really think they made a really good migration compared to the PS2. There are a few things I wasn`t too impressed with price wise but I suppose that's to be expected. Thinking to myself "These are the /first/ games released for the Xbox". The platform has been stable so far *no crashes or anything like that* so I`m hopeful. To be honest I think I would have enjoyed a PS2 just as much, but the built in hard drive, and the ethernet jack is what sold me after it was all said and done. The DVD option is $30 extra so I`ll probably wait a bit for that since I have a quality DVD player anyway, but like I said, I think time will tell. If nothing else you know at least every M$ game released will be available. heh.

  153. games for te xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check out http://www.windowsmedia.com/mg/Games.asp.

    Make sure you watch the preview for "Halo". It's SICK. Lots of Star Wars games too.

    Oh yea you need Windows Media Player to watch these :)

  154. Xbox and M.A.M.E by SolidCore · · Score: 1, Informative

    This looked really cool, Now you can play all those old crapy games on your xbox. Sweet now I can thow away all my other consoles.

  155. A way for Microsoft to build good karma? by zoward · · Score: 1

    It seems like the Xbox is gearing up to be "the" gift this holiday season. This brings back memories of seasons past where companies or individuals would give a PS2 (or something) to a local radio station, which would auction it off for charity - all the while plugging away for the donor company. I remember one major Boston radio station literally begging for a PS2 last year, literally saying "if you can get us one to auction off, we will plug your company in a major way".

    Microsoft should consider cutting out the middleman and give a certain number of Xboxes to radio stations to auction off to charity. The cost to Microsoft would probably be a fraction of what they'd bring on a radio auction at a decent sized station, It would give them lots of favorable free press. It would build momentum for the Xbox. And both the radio stations and the local charities would benefit.

    --
    "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
  156. Can't get this stupid thing to work. by Iberian · · Score: 1, Funny

    I tried to play Halo on my new X-Box but when it boots up it ask me for a 25 digit activation code.

  157. Metal Gear Solid 2 by warnerve · · Score: 1

    A bit off the topic but still video games... A sequence in Metal Gear Solid 2 requires you to upload pictures onto a computer. Well, when the computer is booting it loads Linux. The bootup process is an exact replica. Pretty cool I thought.

  158. C O N V E R G E N C E by renehollan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    People here know that I've gone on and on about having a reasonably powerful device in my living/family room to which I can stream audio and compressed video from a home server (hence the need for some kind of standard network connection). It has to be quiet, and not look like a computer.

    While we're at it, it would be nice if it would let me browse the web, or perhaps run some online games that are playable at some distance from a relatively large, low-resolution (640x480) screen (though I have an HD-ready high-resolution set, most don't). And you know, all these entertainment devices with their complex controls, some of which have a video output for interactive menus are getting a pain to control. Why can't they provide a web server interface to a device with a browser and appropriate plugins, and just be hubbed into the local room 'net?

    The ability to run local entertainment software (i.e. games), networked or not, is a feature that comes for free if we're going to have enough "oomph" to do MPEG2 decoding. While you might want to use it for non-entertainment duties (i.e. checking one's bank acount, or ordering a pizza on-line), work isn't it's primary purpose.

    THAT is what the XBox could be. Architecture should be open, so third parties can develop apps/add on hardware for it. Still, it should be useful enough on it's own to justify it's price. Whether the hard disk (if present) and or CD/DVD-ROM is integrated, or outboard (firewire?) is more of a stylistic issue -- today we have A/V receivers as well as separates.

    In my search I have come across some neat tech by Sigma Designs (http://www.sigmadesigns.com, http://www.sigmadesigns.com/products/netstream_con sole.htm (watch the damn inserted space), and particularly the iDVD3036). So decent convergence products are coming (say 2002).

    But, if PC history tells us anything, the ones that succeed will be more open than the one's that don't. Unless Microsoft opens the XBox up architecturally and makes it easy for third party hacker developers, they will be among the convergence also-rans.

    --
    You could've hired me.
  159. Informative! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had previously thought that the XBox hardware was a little higher spec than the Gamecube. How good of Salon to rid me of that illusion:

    "Compared to the Xbox, Nintendo's new console offers as much computing power, but at a lower price....

    I couldn't read much further.

  160. WOW by Nasticity · · Score: 2

    i've always known most slashdotters are somewhat if not full blown anti MS... but i've always thought of them as quite intelligent people.. and now many of them are making uneducated and outright wrong statements... simply put.. the xbox has a super fast bus... you could spend 5000 dollars on a computer and it couldn't compete... true you wont have a high resolution screen right there in front of your face... but it isn't needed.. because you aren't a foot away from the television... your probably around 7 feet away.. and the screen is atleast 3 times bigger than your monitor so it'll look great... as for the games not making leaps and bounds in technology and inovation... give it time... its a great toy... its not the anti christ... i enjoy playing games on my computer... but im also quite interested in seeing what the xbox has to offer... great graphics have always been a major factor in getting my attention... and the x box has some nice capabilities... now its up to the developers to use those capabilites

    1. Re:WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I suspect alot of people have monitors bigger than their TVs. My monitor is 16" viewable, my TV is about 20" viewable, thus 1.25x more screen to look at. Assuming the average monitor in use by people who play games on their PCs to be 15" viewable, and the average TV used to play video games on is probably about 25" viewable, this translates into 1 2/3 size increase.

      I'm just being nit-picky and don't feel like taking the time to do the calculus to figure out how far away you need to sit from a TV of comparable size to have similar results of looking at a Monitor of smaller size, etc.

      If d is the distance from your eye to the tv, and assuming perfect eye level elevation to the tv. Then for a Computer Monitor of average resolution and dot pitch, etc, the best viewing distance d would be 2*s where s is the viewable diagonal size of the monitor. For a TV I would put that more at 2 * (2^s) where s is in feet. (Keep in mind I pulled these numbers out of my ass)

      Anyway, this is all just to say it would be very interesting if someone were to figure out the optimal viewing distance for size screens based on resolution, dot pitch, etc. and compare values... This certainly has an impact on game playability, and worthfulness of all the effort into awesome graphics for Game Consoles vs. PCs.

    2. Re:WOW by kookbox · · Score: 1

      the screen is atleast 3 times bigger than your monitor so it'll look great

      At least three times bigger? I've got 15" and 19" monitors, but I sure don't have a 45" teevee.

    3. Re:WOW by dohnut · · Score: 1



      A 15" monitor (with the standard 4:3 aspect ratio) is 12"x9", which is 108 square inches. A 45" T.V. is 36"x27", which is 972 square inches, or exactly 9 times bigger than a 15" monitor. By my calculations a 26" T.V. would be approximately 3 times larger than your 15" monitor. I'd also say that a 27"-32" T.V. is the norm - therefore his statement is true.

      --
      Stupider like a fox! - H.S.
  161. You mean they just started selling? by redhairedneo · · Score: 1

    I've had mine for weeks.

    Two actually, I got them off of ebay, here are the links to the auctions:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewIte m& item=1296487556

    http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewIte m& item=1293591459

  162. sounds like you wish you didn't have PS2 by 2ms · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but it sounds a little like you're a typical PS2 owner who fell for the hype, spent way too much money for the biggest let down in consoles ever, and isn't dealing too well with the fact that he/she now has the worst console available aside from the psone.

  163. And Sony joined the gaming market out of love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and patriotism, and faith! In fact, they wish that they could give boxes away for free.

  164. So are you talking about the PS2 or the XBox? by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    The thing is, your statements could almost apply just as well to the PS2 as the XBox. Sure, with the PS2 you have to obtain a seperate solution for ethernet or a HD (which is not totally nessicary as you could consider the memory card enough storage to make things interesting).

    However, you also have to consider that MS had said repeatedly they are NOT making a home PC, they are making a pure game console. To help drive that point home they have made the USB ports non-standard.

    If you look at it from a point of connectivity, the XBox has ethernet but as far as the larger device market goes nothing else. The PS2 has both standard Firewire and USB ports, and also a SUPPORTED version of Linux (and Java in the works). You can use USB keyboards and mice you have sittig around from computers, or go to lots of stores and have keyboards to choose from as well as being able to hook up digital cameras with included cables.

    Which one sounds more like a home PC hub to you? Remember, just because it doesn't have an Intel processor does not mean it can't be a computing device...

    One last point - though I have a cable modem and DSL line (not for long though - thanks a lot Sprint!), people are still going to be using modems for a long time. Sony has realized this and is including a modem with thier ethernet/HD extension. MS has only ethernet which is great for some but not all users. I can't remember exactly what Nintendo was planning, but I think they had a combo modem/ethernet solution as well.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  165. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am giving the domain xboxlinux.com to the first person to successfully port/install Linux to the X-Box. No cost, no strings except you must be willing to continue work on it and release it to the public in some form.

    Gee, that must have cost you all of thirty-five dollars! And you're willing to trade it in exchange for a measly few hundred hours of work?

    People must be lining up already!

    1. Re:Wow! by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but whoever hacks the X-Box risks the legal wrath of Microsoft. Now what could be more exciting?

      For the record, I won't even be buying an X-Box. This could change if someone ports linux to it though.

      Or maybe I should just redirect the domain to /. for the hell of it.

    2. Re:Wow! by ksheff · · Score: 2

      This could change if someone ports linux to it though.

      That's why I bought a Dreamcast.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    3. Re:Wow! by ameoba · · Score: 2

      now if you could only get yourself a broadband adapter for less than you payed for the system itself. +)

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    4. Re:Wow! by ksheff · · Score: 2

      No kidding. I can almost buy two machines for the price of what some people want for broadband adapters.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  166. Then the name must actually be.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    The Green Screen of Renewal

    All of life is a cycle, now chant with me the XBox mantra "Ooh. Aah. Doh! Ooh. Aah. Doh!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  167. Salon's not exactly "objective". by dave-fu · · Score: 1

    Maybe once upon a time I'd have given them credit for being so, albeit obviously liberal-leaning, but as times have moved on and VC has dried up, the quality and quantity of writing that they put out has dropped, and a fair number of their staff writers have adopted the Linux/open-source-pandering inflammatory article "writing" that another high-profile site who shall remain nameless is so well-known for doing.
    Let's not forget that Salon.com is the site that less than a week ago broke the SHOCKING news that there's rampant drug use at LAN parties!, an article so obviously rife with unsubstantiated anecdotes and biased information that a high school paper's editor would have to laughingly decline it.
    Not saying they're wrong, saying take it with a pinch of salt.

    --
    Easy does it!
    This comment has been submitted already, 276865 hours , 59 minutes ago. No need to try again.
  168. Only one game... by yunfat · · Score: 1

    Of the x-box luanch games I have played, only one has impressed me, DOA 3, and even then largely because of its graphical enhancements as opposed to gameplay enhancements. Overall, X-box is clearly capable of quality graphics, perhaps the most stunning yet on a console, however I hasten to remind people that gameplay will win out over graphics in the long run. My real question is, why isnt there a truly innovative title in the lineup for X-box? Why isn't there a Pikmin, or another "quirky" game? Old games with fresh graphics do not a system make.

    --
    "Smokey, this isn't Nam, there are rules." -Walter
  169. Service pack release date? by hysterik · · Score: 1

    I'm delaying my X-Box purchase until the first service pack gets put out, Gartner told me so.

  170. Don't bash Freecell by JMZero · · Score: 1

    You laugh, but Freecell is the only reason my wife lets me have a computer at home.

    I hope that XBox is hacked soon, as I think it has the possibility to really democratize computing (without really enriching MS, they'll take the shaft on producing hardware).

    I want to see a cheap keyboard and printer peripheral. And a cheap word processor (OS is irrelevant, as each disc ships with it). These could be great things. These might even prove effective office machines (new meaning to commodity hardware).

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    1. Re:Don't bash Freecell by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      "You laugh, but Freecell is the only reason my wife lets me have a computer at home"

      I admit it's one of the games I still keep playing time and time again. I just think it's funny, all that power and design just so folks can play there favorite card game on a new platform.

      "I want to see a cheap keyboard and printer peripheral. And a cheap word processor (OS is irrelevant, as each disc ships with it). These could be great things. These might even prove effective office machines (new meaning to commodity hardware). "

      This is where gaming consoles are going. I have argued time and time again here and other discusion areas that small console boxes will replace home PC's. Sony is gearing up to add hard drives. You can add keyboards, zip drives, and even run Linux on it. Why buy a $2000 PC when you can get the same productivity from a game console for a 1/4 of the price.

      If Microsoft is smart they will ensure that IE and some basic office software get shiped with that sucker. Buy a keyboard and you have a cheaper mini PC.

  171. I beg to differ! by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

    Microsoft sells these boxes for whatever price they need to sell them for. We have to be careful not to increase demand too much.

    However, Microsoft is investing all this money into the xbox in order to sell software, licenses or future xbox extensions. The money is not in selling the boxes at all!

    If they have a big pile of unsold xboxen, they can dump the prices even farther. They are willing to lose a LOT of cash in order to take over the gaming console market. In the end, when they are the defacto standard, they can start raising prices again.

    If a large section of the boxes sold are used for totally different purposes, they will truly bleed. They sell all these boxes for a loss, hoping to get that investment back later - but we just install linux on em instead.

    That is completely demoralizing to Microsft. Hopefully, a linux hack will keep them in line since people sick of upgrading their gaming consoles will just install linux and use their box for online gaming, gimping and whatever else can be fun to do with a console.

    Agreed?

    --

    Stop the brainwash

    1. Re:I beg to differ! by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      Thanks to all who have replied to my point, adding qualifications. I would guess MS have made commitments to their subcontractors so the latter can tool up their production lines, so to some extent there is a pile of Xboxen, and then it does follow that it does more harm to MS to not buy an Xbox than it does to buy an Xbox and hack it.

      So, we're all in a good mood, can I propose a thought experiment? It's all very well to say that someone will eventually hack the Xbox, and how cool that would be, and I understand how some folks don't want to say (or more likely can't say) how it would be done. So, what would a stereotyped slashdotter with a time machine and some contrived reason for working for MS at gunpoint suggest the Xbox team should have done to -prevent- hacking?

  172. How do you open the box? by Captoo · · Score: 1

    Has anybody figured out how to open an Xbox without damaging it?

  173. Re:GTA3 != GT3 by pigs · · Score: 0

    You're thinking of gran tursimo 3, a straight up racing simulator. GTA3 is grand theft auto

  174. Defrag a Counsel? by InstantCool · · Score: 1, Interesting

    One thing that's always bugged me about a Hard Drvie on a game system. What happens when you need to defrag the Hard Drive? They're using the thing as a swap disk, so it's gotta be ripping data on and off the thing often. I wonder how long before the HD fails and you lose all your game saves? No doubt there will be a patented Microsoft replacement drive.

    --
    InstantCool
    1. Re:Defrag a Counsel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it also opens up the possibility of 'updating' games - something that you couldnt do on console games before. Now, updates are nice, but not when you have to get them to be actually able to play the game. Extensive playtesting before release isnt that important - you can always release the patch later if the game turns out buggy..

    2. Re:Defrag a Counsel? by InstantCool · · Score: 1

      Extensive playtesting before release isnt that important - you can always release the patch later if the game turns out buggy..

      Assuming you have an Internet connection.

      --
      InstantCool
  175. Just got it! Sony WEGA question by DigitalDragon · · Score: 1

    Dear slasdotters, please help!

    I just got myself an X-Box, it's nice. I played Halo and Project Gotham (which sucks so far). Overall Halo is pretty cool, sound is amazing, but yes, it is just another first shooter and I have not yet got out of the bunkers to the outside.

    Anyways, I have trouble setting high resolution on my TV.
    I bought HD AV pack, put in 3 color wires into TV and can play it, but when I try to run the game even with 480p, it does not display. I have Sony Wega 36''. Please help who can!!!

    --
    http://dtum.livejournal.com
    1. Re:Just got it! Sony WEGA question by Iberian · · Score: 0

      The WEGA doesn't support 480p.

    2. Re:Just got it! Sony WEGA question by renehollan · · Score: 2

      er, mine does... and 1080i too!

      --
      You could've hired me.
    3. Re:Just got it! Sony WEGA question by DigitalDragon · · Score: 1

      Ok. It worked fine on 780, but does not work on 1080. What is your WEGA model?
      Thanks.

      --
      http://dtum.livejournal.com
    4. Re:Just got it! Sony WEGA question by Iberian · · Score: 1

      Dude unless you have an XBR series WEGA you don't have 480,720 or 180 so just forget about it.

  176. That salon article was tainted journalism by machinegestalt · · Score: 1

    I'm not a huge microsoft fan, but that salon article was just one big ad hominem with very little concrete to say against the xbox save "this is microsoft's first console," which is really irrelevant. Does anyone remember what happened with nintendo's first console?

    What really peeved me was that the author had good things to say about games he has never played because they were nintendo titles, while he put down titles just because they were the first crop of titles for the xbox and weren't all 100% ground breaking AAA titles... No console has ever launched with a complete assortment of hits. Usually there's one if you're lucky.

    I can understand peoples' desire to speculate, but this article wasn't speculation it was favoratism and name calling.

    Ex Nihilo

  177. Imagine FlightGear for both PS2 and XBox! by maynard · · Score: 2

    This is one development which I think could be seriously interesting. We know Linux has been ported to the PS2, and we know that the Xbox uses a standard PIII and NVIDIA Gforce chipset. Given GL support and reasonable performance under both graphics chipsets imagine porting FlightGear to the PS2 (it's a given that it should work almost unchanged on the XBox) and providing ISO images for folks to download and burn. This would be a great way to get desirable free software out to the masses. It might even spark greater interest in Linux to boot!

    FlightGear is an impressive flight simulator with a huge amount of scenery data taken from satellite images. Unlike Ace Combat 4, FlightGear actually flies like a real airplane. It's got some networking support and a userbase of real pilots working to make the simulator as real as possible. It's one of the only simulators out there which strives to make star field, moon, and sun locations as real as possible.

    Of course there are other potential targets for GL games ported through Linux, and Linux would provide an ideal quick cross platform development platform for both systems. End users don't need to know that Linux happens to be driving the game (or program) underneath, and it would cost nothing to distribute. I love the idea that free software developers could distribute software for free to both PS2 and Xbox users -- something which I think would surprise quite a few console gamers. Heh. :)

    Cheers,
    --Maynard

    1. Re:Imagine FlightGear for both PS2 and XBox! by Animats · · Score: 2
      It's tought to "port" to the PS2. Most of the compute power is in those wierd vector units, not the "main" CPU. So you can't just move C code over.

      That's the main reason PS2 games have been so long in coming. Major game engine development was necessary.

      Actually, the port that's needed is Linux on the XBox, OpenGL, and Quake.

  178. Great idea! by JMZero · · Score: 1

    X-Box could be the new Commodore 64, just needs:

    1. Linu-X-box with a simple word processor and spreadsheet. Should require no setup, and should sell at Walwart cheap.
    2. Printer/keyboard/mouse adapters - again they should be cheap.

    At some point, the upgrade cycle for PC's just isn't paying off for home users - this may be the next big thing.

    And who cares if MS is the one taking the shaft on the hardware?

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  179. Thank You. by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

    This is the most informative post I've seen yet, yet it's only a '3'.

    You moderators on /. are fucking pathetic.

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
  180. Emulation by Giggles+Of+Doom · · Score: 1

    Personally I'm wondering how long it will take before someone writes and emu for this thing. PCs will have the power very soon, if they don't already, and its basicly DirectX and Windows, shouldn't be too hard to crack. Also going the other way shouldn't be too tough either: turn your $400 XBox into a normal PC to play with and compile linux kernels.

    --
    "A coward dies a thousand deaths, the brave but one."
  181. It's a different world by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

    I am very anit microsoft but that doesn't mean my arguments are invalid. I still think Xbox has a long hard uphill battle.

    It's a different business for MS. There not use to it. Sony and Nintendo are veterans and know how to compete in the console business. The Xbox may be a nice peice of hardware but that doesn't always sell. MS lovers have been harping Linux lovers about that for years.

    If MS wants to get a peice of this market they are best to highlight the disadvantages of Playstation and Nintendo. Playstation has a lot of adult games. I would put out the message that PS2 has too many kid unfriendly games. Buy Xbox for more kid friendly games. That's how nintendo competes. Shutting of the DVD player unless you buy the remote is not good for Xbox. Pack more value for you dollar, especially in the economic downturn. I don't see Xbox doing this.

    1. Re:It's a different world by Armand28 · · Score: 0

      Jeff said:

      "There not use to it. Sony and Nintendo are veterans and know how to compete in the console business"

      Gee, that sounds familiar... Oh wait, I remember!!

      "Playstation will never top the Nintendo because Sony is new to the Console arena and Nintendo has the fan base and experience....."

      Hmmmmmm... Whoever makes the best console with the best games wins. Period. I don't care if FORD decides to make a console, if it rocks, it will sell.

      The only group that buys stuff by brand alone regardless of quality or price is Slashdot readers, who only use non-Microsoft products because Microsoft is evil... I, on the other hand, don't care if Atilla the Hun made the console, if it rocks, I'll buy it.

      --

      Armand28

      "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
  182. if and only if by Refried+Beans · · Score: 2

    I would only buy an X-Box if
    1. I can install Linux on it
    2. Microsoft loses more money on the sale than I would be spending on the purchase.
    3. The hardware doesn't start fires

    1. Re:if and only if by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

      refried said he would only buy xBox if:
      1. I can install Linux on it

      the article points out that this is not too hard, and that Linux game ports are expected.

      2. Microsoft loses more money on the sale than I would be spending on the purchase.

      Yes, they lose money on each box. Unlike Nintendo, who makes money on each box.

      As to the last point about starting fires - were you planning to overclock it?

      [caveat - I own MSFT and NTDOY stock]
      -

      --
      --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  183. Have fun by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    Have fun watching low-rez PS2 games on your hi-rez HD-TV. All it does is change the aspect ratio. The PS2 can't afford to sacrifice performace for higher resolution. Shit... Even many Dreamcast games offer the 16:9 aspect ratio. PS2 doesn't evenhave real VGA compatibility. What a nice console. It does have some interesting games though (finally), and that's what matters, right?

  184. But didn't you hear? by JMZero · · Score: 1

    Did you miss the fact that the X-Box is buggy and the games aren't any fun and all you'll see is the green screen of death and it the graphics are grainy and Halo pauses every time you step and the games aren't original and it is logically impossible that they would be because MS would suck the creativity out of developers just by looking at them and a game like Halo could only be creative if it was ported to the PS2 where the control pad isn't unusable and the heat doesn't burn down your house and the xbox is too big?

    That's it! You must be some sort of MS mole!

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    1. Re:But didn't you hear? by Red+Avenger · · Score: 1

      XBox buggy? Nope sorry it works great
      Games Aren't any fun? Sorry not true Halo is badass
      Green Screen of Death? None here
      Halo pause? Nope loads extremely fast

      How much do you hate MS? I'll bet it really pisses you off that this is going to be a success isn't it? Typical closed minded linsux zealot.

    2. Re:But didn't you hear? by Anthonares · · Score: 1
      I hate to be the one to point out to you that you completely missed the sarcasm of the post you responded to. Great observation skills!

      --
      *most people never really think about the consequences*
    3. Re:But didn't you hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, well I definitely cut him some slack because while I picked up on the sarcasm, it was so close to the usual Slashdot post that gets modded up as "Insightful" (or the comments from the editors in the story submissions) that I could see how you'd have to be a real pro to spot the difference.

  185. NetBSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, if XBox uses PC hardware, can we port NetBSD to XBox and run FlightGear?

  186. OT: target and walmart. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Targets (Midwest equivalent of Wal-Mart)

    There are targets and Wal-Mart's all over the nation. Target has been advertising on MTV of late, and are trying to reinvent themselves as the 'classy' low-price department store, rather then competing with Wal-Mart on price. The target where I live has a much nicer appearance, etc.

    There was chick on Conan O'Brian a long time ago raving about target and how she shopped in the target in Manhattan because they were the only place that sold the perfume she used.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  187. Ethernet useless? by JMZero · · Score: 1

    How can you possibly say this? Surely you can't think that the ability to connect machines together is useless? Surely? Please? Obviously the millions who play games on the Internet aren't having any fun.

    "an ethernet connection on a console isn't some gaming messiah. there are currently no games which i could see benefitting from this on any console, nor any in the future.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  188. Re: Shenmue 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sega Europe is putting it out with English subtitles instead of Japanese ones (the game is largely spoken in chinese) for european DC owners.

    It's out on Nov 30th

    If you can play european imported games on your Dreamcast or get it chipped, import it.

  189. GTA3 isn't coming to Xbox until next year by Amon+CMB · · Score: 2

    If you want GTA3 on Xbox, be ready to wait. It'll be next year.

    --


    Men believe what they want. - Caesar
  190. emulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a programmer, but wouldn't it be incredibly easy to make and emulator for the x-box on a pc? why would anyone spend 500 bucks on a console when most people already have a Intel based system at home?

    1. Re:emulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You troll shit.

  191. Microsoft diluting themselves by bodland · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As an IS professional charged with the support of applications and databases running on NT and Windows2k I find it distressing that a company that has for the past few years devoted themselves to taking over the mid-range server OS market has invested this much time and energy into a video game box.

    If that money slated for the Xbox had been put to work on XP maybe the general reception to XP would not have been as cool. And companies are left with OS's that are rapidly becoming obsolete because efforts to maintain a consistent OS were subjegated by the quest for the "perfect" game box.

    Be realistic, in any corporation there are huge tradeoffs for funding of projects. Regardless if the Xbox is a success, the damage to MS's already shaky IS relationship has been magnified in my view.

    This only feeds the perception that many IS people feel, that Microsoft is only really good at making a platform for games and not a serious platform for business. In the end the Xbox might be seen as the best thing to happen to Linux.

    1. Re:Microsoft diluting themselves by BlizzardGroupie · · Score: 1

      And companies are left with OS's that are rapidly becoming obsolete because efforts to maintain a consistent OS were subjegated by the quest for the "perfect" game box.

      Obsolete operating systems? Last I knew, something only became obsolete when a new product was released that better met market demands than the current solution. Not only that, but XP was never meant to replace NT/2k as a "mid-range server OS".

      If you're worried about obsolete MS operating systems, then perhaps you're in the wrong business. The only company that makes an MS OS obsolete is MS. Besides, what "needs" to do you perceive to have of your OS that Win2k is not meeting? If you're against MS so much, than move on and find a better solution. You're only encouraging them to be lazy by waiting for them to give you a better solution. There's lot of successful companies out there with mid-range servers running Linux..and they love it.

      This only feeds the perception that many IS people feel, that Microsoft is only really good at making a platform for games and not a serious platform for business.

      You must be crazy then. I recall the days when gamers thought Windows would never be a viable gaming plaform. Long live DOS, they claimed. I don't know about you, but the only solid, decent, and reliable gaming platform from MS is Win2k and even then, it can be flaky at times. Win 9x and ME are crap for stability and we all know about (pure) NT and gaming.

      If IS people are worried about the money being poured in to the XBOX by MS instead of "innovating" their OS, then perhaps they should examine things like the Compaq-HP merger or the rapid expansion and takeover of AOL-TW and see how THAT'S going to affect their IS world...

      --
      /* No comment */
    2. Re:Microsoft diluting themselves by Armand28 · · Score: 0

      HOLY CLUELESS!!

      As the manager of an IT division, I think you need to find a career that requires less thinking.

      So, you think that the XBOX dev team splits their time between making midrange server OS'S and XBOX games? Man, you need to get a clue.

      Think of the XBOX dev team as a WHOLE DIFFERENT COMPANY, with ALL DIFFERENT PEOPLE. Geeze, like MS has 10 employees and they have so split their time between XBOX and O/S's.

      --

      Armand28

      "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
    3. Re:Microsoft diluting themselves by bodland · · Score: 1

      Sure its a whole different venture. At a higher level, was the money that was spent on Xbox development and marketing the right business thing to do for Microsoft? When they have committed themselves to taking over enterprise level computing it would have been a better idea to spend gobs of money addressing issues of reliability and security.

      I don't have a large problem with Microsoft other than if you are going to play in arena at least make the product as best as it possibly can be. And all I have seen so far is that NT has not been the savior of the enterprise and Windows 2k has been slow to be adopted by many shops because vendors are not ready with there apps yet. Lets see while Microsoft is promoting the Xbox with millions of dollars, IBM is promoting the use of Linux on there hardware as an alternative to Windows NT, 2k....

    4. Re:Microsoft diluting themselves by Armand28 · · Score: 0

      Um, you know Microsoft owns that WebTV thing, right??

      An XBOX is like a WebTV with a better processor and a hard drive. What's wrong with that?

      As for DIVERSIFICATION (ahem..not dilution) look at the LARGEST company in the WORLD: General Electric.

      They make refridgerators, televisions, aircraft engines. They own television networks and production companies. Are they spread too thin??

      My degree is in business management, and during times like this you realize the importance of diversification. You get to leverage your exisiting resources to the fullest as well as your supply chain economies of scale while not putting all your eggs in one sector.

      MS already wanted to make a "Computing appliance", which is why they purchased WebTV. A console is the next logical evolutionary step, since WebTV was too focused a product to generate interest.

      --

      Armand28

      "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
  192. The killer online advantage... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    One thing the article mentions is that the XBox gets a bit of a head start over Sony, which has yet to release the ethernet/HD expansion pack.

    On the other hand, how many people do you think will be interested in online Halo play, vs...

    Online Star Wars?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The killer online advantage... by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

      I vote for Online Star Wars.

      GameCube, here I come!

      Plus, those Pimkin look really cool gamewise.

      [caveat - I own both MSFT and NTDOY stock]
      -

      --
      --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  193. uhh yeah let me drive to Redmond.. by ebbv · · Score: 1


    to collect my money from you.

    yes i have and they are complete and utter junk.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:uhh yeah let me drive to Redmond.. by Red+Avenger · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true MS hater. It really kills you that they are so successfull doesn't it. My bet is you haven't ever even seen $300 dollars in person. If thats too much for you then how about 10 bucks. I am sure your burger king wages can cover that right?

      Anyways the offer still remains? Whats the matter chicken???

      HA HA HAHAH AH H A HAH AHA

  194. What PC users have always known, verified by sjonke · · Score: 1

    XBox simply proves that, just like what Windows fans have said since the beginning days of the Macintosh - The Mac is a toy. No... wait a minute...

    Steve

    --
    --- What?
    1. Re:What PC users have always known, verified by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Heh... yeah, I've always loved hearing people call the Mac "a toy, because it has no good games."

      My guess has always been that playing the Monotonous-FPS-of-the Month on a Windows box rots the part of the brain that allows irony to be detected.

      As for the XBox, I'm not buying it, or the GameCube, or the PS2. Got enough classic consoles to keep me happy, the ones that were made back when gameplay mattered... not just the same three lame styles of games with purtier and purtier pixchurs every year.

      ~Philly

  195. Microsoft's future by Animats · · Score: 2
    Microsoft is acting like a) their entire future is riding on this thing.

    It's not that Microsoft will go bankrupt in the near future. It's keeping the stock price up that's hard.

    They've basically reached market saturation. Everybody with disposable income who wants one already has a PC. Businesses have about one PC per employee. Most new sales are replacements. And there's really no pressing reason for most people to upgrade.

    That's usually the situation in which margins go down. That's already happened in PC hardware. It ought to happen in software. Microsoft is frantically trying new business strategies (raising the price for Windows XP, technical tie-ins, a subscription model) to avoid becoming a "mature business".

    But there's no "killer app" in sight to force the next generation of technology.

  196. Oh, the irony by Zico · · Score: 2

    I can't stress how hilarious it is to see Slashdotters, many of whom take pride in the amount of MP3s they've downloaded for CDs they've never bought, self-righteously coming to the defense of the artists that they've been ripping off. Let's note the difference, shall we? While you're more than happy to give a big "Fuck you!" to any band that asks that you quit pirating their music, Microsoft actually asked for and received the bands' permission. Beautiful.

  197. well that's great for you by ebbv · · Score: 1


    but i personally feel no need to find opponents on the internet. more importantly though, currently no games take advantage of this.

    GT4 is supposedly going to include an online world where people can participate in real scheduled events, etc. that will be neat. but right now it doesn't matter at all, was my point.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:well that's great for you by fodi · · Score: 0

      When you're good enough (one day) to beat the computer and find all the secret stuff, you'll want to play human players. It can really extend a games lifespan...

  198. you miss my point entirely by ebbv · · Score: 1


    as did a bunch of other people who replied to me.

    an ethernet connection can be a useful thing, but currently there are ZERO GAMES which are announced to use such a thing on the consoles.

    in case you missed the clueboat, PSX2's are already linkable to each other.

    there are ways that it COULD be used, but it is not being used. personally, i don't think they're such a boon to console games that i'm angry it's not there.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:you miss my point entirely by JMZero · · Score: 1

      Seems to me you just plain changed your mind. You said:

      "there are currently no games which i could see benefitting from this on any console, NOR ANY IN THE FUTURE." - emphasis added

      There are already plenty of console games that work over the Internet (mostly on Dreamcast). MS has plans for MMRPG's and such. Whether they're good or not, or whether you'll like them is up for debate. But the Ethernet port will certainly be "useful" in making them work.

      --
      Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    2. Re:you miss my point entirely by alexmogil · · Score: 1
      in case you missed the clueboat, PSX2's are already linkable to each other.

      XBOX Link Cable.

      --
      A winner is you!
  199. A funny thing happened the other day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went in to a local Circuit City to see the game cube and the X-box that was on display. First off, I noticed not 1 person was playing the X-box. I thought, cool maybe I might get to check it out. I walked up to the display only to find it turned off. So, I found a sales rep and he said it was turned off because it had problems playing the demo game they were using. I asked what game, but he didn't want to tell me. I think he didn't know. A few days later, I was looking for a new dvd-rom, which just so happens to face the game consoles on display, I noticed the X-box was on. But, the screen wasn't moving. It froze up! Way to go M$, another great "high quality" crappy product for the brain washed public to waste money on! Now I know why I will NEVER own a Micro$oft product. Game system or other wise.

  200. XBox in Canada by frank249 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had a look at the Xbox at a Future Shop. They are charging $600Cdn($377US). One of the store clerks was trying to set up a demo machine but it was too big to fit in the kiosk case they had for it. I asked him about playing DVDs on it and he said you could but you had to spend another $50 for the DVD controler and $25 for the cable to connect it to the TV. It comes with one game controler and to add extras would be another $50 each. So now I'm looking at shelling out $825 + $120 in taxes. I said no thanks and walked on which is what I suspect is most Canadians will say.

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

    1. Re:XBox in Canada by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      "I said no thanks and walked on which is what I suspect is most Canadians will say"

      I agree. I did some comparing about 3 weeks ago to purchase a game console for christmas. I wanted to get a look at the GameCube for nintendo but couldn't. PS2 was available, had everything I wanted, and I could buy it right then and there. No waiting. It was the cheapest of all three systems.

    2. Re:XBox in Canada by irix · · Score: 1

      [note: I live in Canada too]

      If Microsoft took the US price and multiplied by 1.5 to get the Canadian cost for everything they are smoking crack big time. There is no way in hell I am spending $1000 to get set up with a usable Xbox system.

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  201. Mod this guy down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is thinking intelligently and objectively about Microsoft. We can't have any of that around here. This is Slashdot after all. We sit at terminals all day because we hurt our knees from jerking them to hard. Please mod him into oblivion.

  202. Time is like a river by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    And history repeats, but usually not so quickly. Everywhere I read that Microsoft is new to the game, unexperience, etc. These make me laugh. Its clear that there's more animosity towards MS than the X-Box itself (though it may well deserve animosity on its own).

    Ever heard of the MSX(or for the matter of experience, MS Flight Sim)? While MS wasn't really involved with the hardware production, neither can they be said to have been very involved with their latest exploit. The MSX was a PC version of Pinoccio, the console that wanted to be a PC. To a large extent it is. Soviets used it quite a bit in education. Microsoft's involvement was MS BASIC as an operating system. MS now denies that the MS in MSX means Microsoft, but the OS was originally called MicroSoft eXtended BASIC. Go figure.

    Interestingly, there was more than crap edutainment games made for it. Ever hear of Metal Gear? Both MG 1 and 2 were made for the MSX. Looks way better than the NES version too. Crazyness, I tell you!

    And when did this whole MSX thing happen? "back when [you were] 13, playing Zelda or Sonic!"

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  203. Salon article stereotypical and racist by Western+Light · · Score: 1

    The writer seems that he can barely conceal his disgust of all things American/Western and plays to typical racist stereotypes of Westerners/Americans. It's typical of what is increasingly seen throughout Asia.

    The Western/American stereotype is as he describes Microsoft's Steve Balmer: arrogant, obnoxious, fat ("big-thigh bravado"), dirty ("soaked armpits") loud (he "roars" and "screeches"), unintelligent, lazy, slovenly, and worships money.

    The Japanese on the other hand are industrious, creative, intelligent, hardworking, modest, artistic, but you get the picture. Check out the description of Asians: "unflappable Sony Entertainment CEO Ken Kutaragi or revered Nintendo developer Shigero Miyamoto elegantly groomed, unassuming men who modestly offer their wares with only a hint of boyish twinkle, as if they were toymakers to the emperor's children.

  204. Re:First they knockoff the OS X, now the showmansh by starshinecruzer · · Score: 1

    You missed the point of the comment: they stole the "showmanship", not the "X-Box interface". I don't believe I even mentioned anything about the X-Box gui in the entire message.

  205. I think this article is pants. by Computer! · · Score: 2, Informative
    First off, although /. sells it as a "review" of the XBox, I couldn't find a single instance in which the "reviewer" actuall tocuhed an XBox. In fact, the third page didn't even mention the XBox at all, instead focusing entirely on the PS2. The rest of the article was full of fact problems, and general poor journalism, detailed below:
    • And for its own billion-dollar system, Microsoft leads off with ... a guy in a boxy outfit with a title for a name, his humanity masked off by a faceplate of tinted glass.

      Uh, who's the big mascot for the PS2? A snowboarding guy? The fact is that single-character branding only works on Japanese kids nowadays. Even Nintendo has figured that out, and isn't pushing Mario on us anymore.
    • And that's it for the Xbox premiere list.

      Bullshit. There's more than a dozen games on that list, each one of them better than anything PS2 had at premiere. Remember the crap that PS2 had on shelves for its launch? If you could even find a game.


    • This sense is validated by a recent survey of consumers in the market this Christmas for a console; overwhelmingly (as in 62 percent) they preferred the Playstation 2, and primarily on the strength of its brand and wide variety of games.


      Again, bullshit. Although the 62% figure is correct, with XBox and Gamecube basically tied, the reasons for choosing PS2 had more to do with "brand leadership" and Sony-ness than games. Games were listed as third in the list of reasons. Even then, it had to do with variety, not quality.

    I could go on, but you get the point. That article was crap. Not a review, more of an editorial. The author was so afraid of adding publicity to the XBox machine that he hardly mentioned the console at all, instead focusing on why he thought PS2 and G^3 were so much better.
    --
    If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    1. Re:I think this article is pants. by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      "Again, bullshit. Although the 62% figure is correct, with XBox and Gamecube basically tied, the reasons for choosing PS2 had more to do with "brand leadership" and Sony-ness than games. Games were listed as third in the list of reasons. Even then, it had to do with variety, not quality. "

      You think the 62% figure is correct but doesn't make a difference. What planet are you on? With all that's stacked against Microsoft in the gaming console business, and all the market share Sony ALL READY HAS you think the Xbox will fly off the shelves? Your dreaming.

    2. Re:I think this article is pants. by Armand28 · · Score: 0

      What did you expect from Slashdot? They find the one article on the XBox that's negative, and even though its from a guy that has never even PLAYED one, they post it.

      I guess thinking for themselves is too tough.

      The brain of a Slashdot Reader:

      Microsoft = EVIL

      Don't jusdge their products on their own merits, assume that they are all bad.

      For a bunch of smart people, you all are really ignorant.

      --

      Armand28

      "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
    3. Re:I think this article is pants. by Computer! · · Score: 1

      "You think the 62% figure is correct but doesn't make a difference. What planet are you on? "

      Certainly not Uranus. Ha ha! Anyway, the 62% figure is important, but acting like that loyalty is due to the actual quality of the system is bullshit. Brand loyalty only works in the console industry as long as the games are there. Remember Sega?

      With all that's stacked against Microsoft in the gaming console business, and all the market share Sony ALL READY[sic]you think the Xbox will fly off the shelves? Your[sic]dreaming.

      Seeing as how none of the EBs in my area had any, and had sold all of their pre-orders, I would say you are wrong. There are no XBoxes on the shelves. Whether they got off of them by flying or Greyhound, I don't give a shit.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
  206. Correction. by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    SOME games used the SuperH Dreamcast WinCE. Most of them were the shitty games, too. The best games used the SEGA Dreamcast OS instead.

    How many more times do we need to tell you guys this? The damn console is 3 years old now.

  207. Say what? by Zico · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't consider a sequel important in the grand scheme of things.


    Then why, just two sentences later did you say, "GT3, GTA3 and MGS2 are going to be like that ['important'] for the PS2?" Maybe they're just there for decoration, but I was under the impression that those little numbers after the acronyms indicated that they're sequels. Which of course, to you, are unimportant. Unless they're on the system you're pimping for, I guess.

  208. You never had a dreamcast did you? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1
    an ethernet connection on a console isn't some gaming messiah

    Obviously from someone who never ever played PSO... After racking up several hundred hours on PSO using my DC ethernet card (through my linux router) I said to myself - I can't imagine why a console *wouldn't* have one of these.

  209. Sorry. by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    Grolsch is great too.

  210. Forget the thought experiment! by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    Whoops. Suppose MS prevent Xbox hacking by smearing chocolate sauce over the chips. Someone who doesn't know this speculates that chocolate smeared over the chips would have prevented hacking, and then someone else says it could be wiped off. It looks like the latter person is trying to circumvent protection on the real thing rather than as part of a thought experiment.



    I don't want anyone to get in trouble with DMCA or anything like that, so please be careful.

  211. I know who you are now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the genius behind the CueCat infomercials! :)

  212. xBox vs Gamecube - kids reaction by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    Well, they better be aiming for the 14-30 yo age range, cause my 10yo son tells me everyone is down on the xBox, even the ones who demo'd it at Pacific Place and other spots.

    But the Gamecube definitely has the mind share there.

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  213. halo on xbox? naww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I want to play a FPS on an X-Box with the X-Box's joystick-equivalent GamePad? At least GameCube's premiere title, Rogue Squadron, is a flight game where a gamepad/joystick makes sense. I'll play Halo on the PC where I can use a mouse. It boggles my mind that Microsoft premiere game is a FPS. Maybe it shows they fundamentally don't understand the market.

  214. Slashdot is a bunch of bitter geeks!! by Armand28 · · Score: 0

    HEADLINE:

    "Microsoft CURES AIDS AND CANCER"

    Slashdot headline:

    "Why Microsoft sucks for stealing the opportunity to cure cancer from independant drug companies"

    The XBOX is a great console, but you people cannot think for yourselves well enough and simply damn everything MS.

    If you all find out MS created LINUX, you'll suddenly post all the million reasons LINUX sucks.

    Learn to think for yourselves and don't judge every product by simply looking at the brand name. How shallow is that?

    --

    Armand28

    "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
    1. Re:Slashdot is a bunch of bitter geeks!! by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      "Learn to think for yourselves and don't judge every product by simply looking at the brand name"

      So give some logical arguments why Xbox is better and will get market share. Look at the arguments against it and come up with reasons to counter them. Your post doesn't have a wiff of inteligence in it.

    2. Re:Slashdot is a bunch of bitter geeks!! by Armand28 · · Score: 0

      1. Better platform. The capabilities of the XBOX are apparent at launch, the PS2 had NOTHING at launch, it was "Wait for GT3". The XBox delivers with its launch titles, and the best is yet to come.

      2. MS has the funding to win. Money will secure them a LOT of titles. They have the pockets to take a loss up front to build user base and capture more exclusives.

      3. They are NOT only marketing to kids. The PS2 is as popular with 20-somethings and 30-somethings as it is with teens, but 20's and 30's have MONEY. Gamecube wins the kiddies with their "Super Zelda Cartoon Dance Dance Extravaganza" but XBOX delivers sports and driving titles to the older crowd, plus Oddworld to the teens.

      4. The platform is complete. The Gamecube uses PROPRIETARY minidiscs, the XBOX is DVD. The XBOX has broadband and network connectivity. the XBOX has a hard drive. These are options or don't exist for other platforms. "The PS2 costs soo much less" until you buy all the options to catch it up to the XBox.

      5. Gamecube launch in JAPAN was dissapointing. They didn't sell out!! They CLOSE SCHOOLS in Japan when major consoles are released, yet the GameCube hit with a thud.

      I personally don't want a GameCube when I can get a DVD player with excellent games for a little more. Noone I know even wants the gamecube, but then again I don't know any 8 year olds so that makes sense.

      The PS2 rocks, but compare XBOX launch titles with the PS2 CURRENT MATURE lineup and you'll see the XBOX has a slight edge. Now compare XBOX launch titles with PS2 launch titles and you'll see the evolution this platform will take.

      --

      Armand28

      "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
    3. Re:Slashdot is a bunch of bitter geeks!! by Armand28 · · Score: 0

      Oh, and did I mention the XBOX is PROGRESSIVE SCAN DVD!!!!!

      Go price a standalone progressive scan dvd player.

      --

      Armand28

      "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
    4. Re:Slashdot is a bunch of bitter geeks!! by phillymjs · · Score: 2

      "Microsoft CURES AIDS AND CANCER"

      Yeah, that would be great. I'm sure everyone with either disease would love to have re-purchase the cure every year or have Microsoft employees come out and re-infect them.

      Yes, this is a poke at Microsoft and their ridiculous love of licensing. Why? I just got my MCP "Welcome" info packet yesterday, and the certificate was in an envelope with what was essentially a EULA sticker sealing it shut. I have to agree to some contract to read a piece of paper or hang it on my wall? Pfft!

      I can't wait to see how Microsoft deals with people who beat or become bored with X-Box games and try to resell them on eBay or at Funcoland.

      ~Philly

    5. Re:Slashdot is a bunch of bitter geeks!! by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1

      Learn to think for yourselves and don't judge every product by simply looking at the brand name. How shallow is that?

      Excuse me ? The only persons who seem unable to evaluate the quality of a product currently are the ones buying M$ products out of marketing hypes. Meaning you. I'm pretty sure you never look at the quality of their product before buying them.

      You see Microsoft on the box, then you say:

      " Well! Since everybody uses it, it must be good."

      I don't mean to be rude ( In fact yes i do ), but when is the last time you really checked the full specs and reviews of a product before buying it. (10 years, 20 ... ) What i can see of most north american customers these days is a lack of criticism and a faithful fanatism towards big marketing campaigns and brands.

      Do us a favor, why don't you go talk your opinion where it matters, meaning somewhere else

      This is the lamest comment i've read today. ( Yes i am pissed, and yes this is a flame. )

  215. GameCube better cuz it uses OpenGL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux, Windows, Mac OS X, Solaris, BSD, etc. and now the GameCube all use OpenGL. I'd much rather support games written to OpenGL than XBox's DirectX. OpenGL games have a greater chance of appearing on more platforms than DirectX.

    1. Re:GameCube better cuz it uses OpenGL by MeNTyFReSh · · Score: 1

      The main reason Gamecube will be better then X-box is not because of OpenGL but the fun factor of the games that Nintendo is producing for it. It seems that Microsoft has gone to the "graphics are better then gameplay" tatic and as we see this in other computer games, we all know that this doesnt work while the gamecube it focus more on the fact that the games they are making for it are fun. Graphics can only please you so many times

      --

      "Eat right, Exercise daily, Die anyways."
      http://www.10angrygamers.com Where purple monkeys attack!!

  216. nope by ebbv · · Score: 1


    because no DC games (including PSO) interested me.

    i'm glad you found it fun, but you have to realize that you are in the minority. in order for a feature like that to be included on consoles enough people have to want it to be profitable, and it's not.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:nope by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I've honestly never seen any profit statements concerning sega.net or pso have you? - its true that PSO ver 2 requires a credit card, but they did knock 10 bucks off the product.

      The dreamcast in general was a relatively successful product in the US - it wasn't as profitable in Japan - which is why they pulled the plug. (that and the PS2).

  217. always around the corner by Erris · · Score: 1
    Um, XBox is also the first system to include a bonefide headset in the works for talking to other game players during games. I assume that voice recognition is just around the corner.

    Gee Fiz, a bone-a-fido headset? Like the ones people have been plugging into the back of their home computers since i486? So why is this just "in the works"? I'm not sure my mom want's to play half life, but I am sure I don't want a head set. M$ is never going to get there.

    The privacy invasion design, if it's anything like their other OS, is ready to go!

    Where did you want to go yesterday? Don't bother to answer, we already know.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  218. Hacking the XBox by Ferox · · Score: 1

    Would it be possible to buy 1 console and be able to play games from a 2nd console? Since the XBox has a harddrive and an obvious OS, could it be possible to modify the code so that it could play PS2(PSone as well) games, among other consoles. Then that way, I could have an easier time to justify the cost.

    --
    I drive WAY too fast to worry about cholesterol!
    1. Re:Hacking the XBox by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      "Since the XBox has a harddrive and an obvious OS, could it be possible to modify the code so that it could play PS2(PSone as well) games, among other consoles"

      Sony wouldn't like that very much. Sony also has a history of suing anyone that trys to develop emulators to work on other platforms.

  219. you could do everything you describe by ebbv · · Score: 1


    on a PC placed in your living room, if you really wanted to. there are *gasp* TV-out cards, you know.

    the only thing you couldn't do is play good console games, which you can't on the X-Box anyway.

    sorry guy, but you're just blowing smoke.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:you could do everything you describe by renehollan · · Score: 2
      From my original post:

      It has to be quiet, and not look like a computer.

      It is real hard to find a PC that does not need active cooling. Some of the STBs today come close... the Allwell iDVD3036 looks interesting, and anything with the Sigma Designs 8400 MPEG2 decoder reduces the need to do MPEG2 in software and thus the need for a fast (i.e. hot) CPU.

      If I were to use a PC, I'd probably go for i810 video with a NetStream2000TV card. Adding a 3d Graphics card will almost certainly mean a fan or two. The again, gaming is not my primary goal, but MPEG2 video streaming is, so i810 mobo video is adequate.

      The Netstream Console is also interesting.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    2. Re:you could do everything you describe by seann · · Score: 0

      you can play consoles games with TV out cards.

      Lots of rage owners with TV out (All in wonders included) will notice the device is almost always in an on state (Tv out device) when the computer is rebooting, and ends just as windows initiates.

      If you ran dos you could play games

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    3. Re:you could do everything you describe by renehollan · · Score: 2
      You can keep the TV-out enabled under Linux, if you let the BIOS set an appropriate mode (640x480i at 60 Hz), and use the framebuffer console and FBDev X Server. Dunno how well that would work with DRI, OpenGL, and XFree86 4.0.1, though.

      I used to have a jpeg with a capture of my old Sony XBR displaying such a desktop and an xatitv window showing the live image capturing the TV in the frame (displaying such a desktop and... ad infinitum). I should dig it up.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    4. Re:you could do everything you describe by seann · · Score: 0

      Although apparently the official XFB_DEV servers do not support Acceleration (says in linux kernel docs) would it support DRI?

      Even so, what about a Normal XFB_XF86 server?
      Anyone provide links?

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  220. Xbox is the only American made console. by Str1der · · Score: 0

    Since many /. readers are likely from the U.S. and with so much Xbox/Microsoft bashing I would like to remind them Xbox is the only American made console on the market. The CPU is from intel, the GPU from nVidia, and the console from Microsoft. Support the U.S.!

    1. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by jeffc128ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The CPU is from intel, the GPU from nVidia, and the console from Microsoft. Support the U.S.!"

      The Intel CPU is manufactured in Asia, the console was farmed to Flextronics and is being built in Mexico.

      And to add another argument, is it really patriotic to buy poorly made products in your own country so you can reward people who can't do the job as well as people in other countries? The argument didn't wash with cars in the 80's.

    2. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by Red+Avenger · · Score: 1

      The hell it didn't. That was the only thing that saved the car industry in the 80's their made in america campaign. They obviously couldn't win with their products so they started trying to get better but in the mean time they got a lot of extra sales from patriotic americans.

      So you are saying products produced in North America don't have the same quality as those produced in Asia and elsewhere? I would beg to differ. The fact of the matter is the Xbox helps our economy much more than it helps Japan's. That is a huge change.

    3. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by Str1der · · Score: 0

      Regardless of where the parts are manufactured, the companies are still U.S. owned. The revenue still goes to the states. As for "poorly made product" that is yet to be seen. So far it has the superior hardware to any console. Crashing demos units were mostly like due to software error in the demo program or consoles that were rejected for retail.

    4. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by NewtonEatPalm! · · Score: 1

      the blind and the dumb amuse me... :-)

    5. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      "So you are saying products produced in North America don't have the same quality as those produced in Asia and elsewhere? I would beg to differ. The fact of the matter is the Xbox helps our economy much more than it helps Japan's. That is a huge change"

      I think quality is independent of the region. Any region can produce crap and/or quality. But the money from Xbox is not going to the states. Since MS is producing it at a loss the money is actually going to Asia and Mexico where it's being manufactured.

      And currently US car makers are in hot financial water. The 80's saw huge inroads to companies like Honda. But that's another topic.

    6. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by Str1der · · Score: 0

      And on your other argument" "And to add another argument, is it really patriotic to buy poorly made products in your own country so you can reward people who can't do the job as well as people in other countries? The argument didn't wash with cars in the 80's." Products are not manufactured outside the U.S. because Americans can't do the job as well, they're manufactured there because costs are less. Also, money saved from manufacturing costs can be used on better components.

    7. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by Str1der · · Score: 0

      Companies dont create a product to lose money. In time Xbox will likely bring MS a lot of revenue.

    8. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      "Companies dont create a product to lose money. In time Xbox will likely bring MS a lot of revenue"

      I agree, if MicroSoft manages to keep a market share in this they will in time make money. But I don't buy the bull argument of "Buy an XBox, support America" crap. For the next year or two that cash will go to Asia and Mexico.

    9. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by Str1der · · Score: 0

      For the next year or two that cash will go to Asia and Mexico. Just because MS is operating at a loss dosent mean the money isnt going to them. Also there are other U.S. companies involved, nVidia and Intel.

    10. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by jeffc128ca · · Score: 1

      "Also there are other U.S. companies involved, nVidia and Intel. "

      Intel will funnel the money to Asia as that's where it's manufactured (The CPU and dozens of supporting chips). I am not sure what nVidia does, but Flextronics who's building the Xbox is in Mexico. The cash goes from your pocket to Microsoft who pays Intel and Flextronics billions, who inturn pay the Mexicans and Asians employee's.

      I not saying all the money will leave the country, but the "Buy America, Buy Xbox" does not pass the litmus test. About 90% of that money will leave the country.

    11. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by Str1der · · Score: 0

      " not saying all the money will leave the country, but the "Buy America, Buy Xbox" does not pass the litmus test. About 90% of that money will leave the country "
      True, alot of money will leave the country, I doubt %90. Considering the alternatives, Sony and Nintendo, I think more money will stay in the states.

    12. Re:Xbox is the only American made console. by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      The revenue still goes to the states .

      Don't you mean the revenue still goes to Gates??

      Which, for now, is, $ > /dev/null

  221. Okay, this is just sad... by Shaheen · · Score: 2

    In reference to the "green screen of death" linked to in the article, since *when* is a simple error message the same as the machine dieing?

    Here, try this: place a single jpeg file in your home directory. Do `chmod +x file.jpg` Now do ./file.jpg

    Doesn't work? Oh, too bad. Well guess what? It's the *SAME THING HERE*.

    Get a clue, Michael. Just because someone doesn't use plain text on a console terminal to show error messages doesn't mean that the machine has crashed.

    --
    You should never take life too seriously - You'll never get out of it alive.
    1. Re:Okay, this is just sad... by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 1

      The point is that this is a console; every machine is the same and developers can code knowing exactly how the machine will react, errors will be very reproducible, and therefore consumers have an expectation that they will never experience an error or crash with thier console, and rightly so. Remember the hoopla over the crash-happy first version of Turok 2? And I would hardly call the game not working a "simple error message." Now, the real reason this is silly is because you should expect crashes in demos of unfinished products, although they are quire embarrassing, but if these problems persist he has a point.

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  222. It's all about the Monopoly by schon · · Score: 1

    Microsoft loses at least $100 for every XBox they sell

    True, but you're not looking at the Big Picture.

    For every unit that MS produces and sells, they lose $100.

    For every unit they produce that they don't sell, they lose $500.

    For every unit that MS sells, they add that to the total, and tell developers "look how many potential customers you're losing"

    I can hurt them more by NOT buying one.

    1. Re:It's all about the Monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the Bigger Picture?

      If you don't buy that XBox on the shelf, someone else will.

      If the store runs out of XBox, christmas shoppers will buy GameCube or PS2 instead.

      If XBox sales are large but XBox game sales are small, developers will notice.

    2. Re:It's all about the Monopoly by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

      If the store runs out of XBox, christmas shoppers will buy GameCube or PS2 instead.

      If XBox sales are large but XBox game sales are small, developers will notice.


      Hmmm. So basically, the point here is buy the xBox as a hack device to run Linux or BSD on and DON'T buy any games for it.

      Sounds good to me. They halved their ship quotas anyway, and the devs will be watching to see what the game cart sales are anyway, not the box sales.

      To give an example, it does a dev no good to gen for a platform that sells 2 games per box, when they could gen for a platform that sells 6 games per box.

      It's all about the games ...

      --
      --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  223. hello! by ebbv · · Score: 1


    you miss my point.

    a) more storange is not necessarily a bad thing, but it's not a reason to buy a console. the games are. one memory card is enough for probably all the games you could be playing at one time (unless you're like one of my friends who makes save games in final fantasy every 5 minutes.) of course a bit of caching would be nice too, but it's not a reason to buy a console.. actuall most games on the PSX2 don't have *that* awful of load times.

    b) ethernet WOULD be nice if some games would use it but none are! (not literally, but none of the big games.)

    you need to stop and think about things a bit before you go off on me again.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:hello! by Pengo · · Score: 2


      The whole point I was trying to make is that when the ethernet and the hard drive are standard parts of the game, developers will use it.. but to say that no games support ethernet, so why get ethernet?

      Sounds like a chicken and egg scenerio , nobody is going to develop it until ethernet is standard. Same with caching and hard drives, etc.

      I am actually very excited at the prospect of being able to load up media onto a console and use it for playing media (such as mp3's, whatever) in the living room.

      Cheers

    2. Re:hello! by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Think about this for a moment. Why exactly is it that Microsoft is getting into the console business? The answer to that is elementary. Up until now the PC gaming industry has been small potatoes compared to the console gaming industry. This despite the fact that PCs are generally more powerful, and more flexible than consoles, and the fact that PCs are useful for stuff besides playing games (even stodgy accounts have a computer, and are therefore part of the potential market).

      You might consider getting a DSL connection and hooking it up to your X-Box so you can play some WAN games, but I can guarantee you that most people are not interested in adding another $40/month to their budget so that they can play games on-line. Even worse, most of the people that are willing to play games online already have a computer outfitted to do precisely that!

      It's no wonder the number of projected games for the X-Box is positively anemic. Why should software developers pay Microsoft for the privilege of making games for the X-Box when they can target the (currently) larger PC gamer market for free. The $500 that I would spend on an X-Box package would actually buy a fairly decent PC (or at least a significant upgrade to an existing PC), and there are lots of PC games coming down the pike. I know that I personally would much rather have a more powerful general purpose PC than a toy that plays PC games.

      Microsoft's X-Box's one true advantage is that it is supposedly easy to develop for. Well that's neat, but it's only easy to develop for because it is a PC. If you simply develop your game for the PC, then you will likely target a bigger market, and you won't have to pay a development fee to Microsoft to help them recover their losses selling the X-Box hardware.

      In other words, Microsoft is aiming their console squarely at an absolutely tiny market, one that is probably even smaller than the PC gaming market they are trying to escape. If it wasn't for the fact that Microsoft has money to burn on talented developers they wouldn't have a chance.

  224. i realize this by ebbv · · Score: 1


    but it will look better and play better (IMHO, mouse and keyboard vs. controller.. and don't give me that you can have a mouse and keyboard for your console, like i wanna bend over to use those on my coffee table) on the PC.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:i realize this by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Actuall, from what I've read, Microsoft does NOT want you plugging a keyboard or mouse into the XBox, because it's not a PC. Of course, Unreal for PS2 supports any generic USB mouse and keyboard....

      If Microsoft remains adamant about this no keyboard/mouse thing, I can't see online gaming becoming popular at all. You'd think they would have learned this lesson from WebTV...

  225. Personalities by thewiz · · Score: 1
    ..."Microsoft leads off with ... a guy in a boxy outfit with a title for a name, his humanity masked off by a faceplate of tinted glass.
    Come to think of it, for a Microsoft product, this is the perfect figurehead. It's also branding suicide."

    Sounds like "Bill the Borg" is trying to make their brand's personality a Borg. Whould this be considered plagerism?
    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  226. oi vey! your stupidity is painful by ebbv · · Score: 1


    you even quoted the part where i explain what i meant.

    read it again.

    in plain terms : ethernet now == not useful.

    ethernet in the future == probably useful.

    but the console developers need to start putting it to use, and if you look at all the upcoming big titles, they aren't. please do a little thought before you knee-jerk back your drivel in my direction.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  227. Can it run Linux yet? by q2a · · Score: 1

    I want one so I can compile Linux x-apps/games. The really good games, "GTA2/MGS2," are all on the PS2 so this is just a cheap PC to me.

  228. What! by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

    I tried those games on the N64 and I found all FPS games except Goldeneye to be virtually unplayable. I simply could not get the thing to respond quickly enough. Doom would've played nice since there's no need for a Z-axis there, but come on already. Goldeneye handled this by controlling the Z-axis for you; the others didn't. Wasn't really that great though. Want to jump off a catwalk in Goldeneye to surprise someone? Forget it, use the ramp. It just couldn't handle it.

    GoldenEye was a good game, to a point. After killing about 900 anonymous soldiers though, it got a bit tedious and started to become a huge pain in the ass.

    Multiplayer was better, but I never figured out why Nintendo didn't hack in a simple Appletalk-like protocol with USB ports or something so you could network the boxes. Put some of those together with some smallish TV sets, and multiplayer would have been a whole lot better. I'm not a big believer in the multiplayer+single screen thing anymore; unless you're talking about Tetris or Mario Party or something like that.

    Also, Goldeneye made me motion sick far quicker than any FPS I played before or since, and I won't touch it anymore.

    In short, the best games we played on the N64 have been Tetris (my wife's preference), Zelda64 (with the walkthrough of course, and I won't touch Majora's Mask as I'm afraid of the time suckage), and Diddy Kong.

    FWIW though, I did like the N64 controller. It was especially natural to use during Mario64 and Diddy Kong.

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  229. Slashdot is NOT FOX news. by liposuction · · Score: 0

    You want fair and balanced, go to fox new channel. Like /. is going to have anything fair towards a company like microsoft.

    Please.

    Go away, and whine somewhere else. M$ sux.

    --
    "Thoughts are more powerful than any weapon, and I don't even let my people own guns." --Joseph Stalin
  230. talk to me when you get out of high school by ebbv · · Score: 1


    little boy, my car probably costs more than you've earned in your entire life.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:talk to me when you get out of high school by Red+Avenger · · Score: 1

      Right,

      *Newsflash* Hotwheels aren't real cars. I am sure you think your hotwheels cars are really expensive, but in actuality they aren't. Oh and by the way there is no Santa Claus. I stand corrected again. I thought you were at least middle school age but it appears you are even younger than that. So I will again adjust the wager of my bet. How about a nickel? I am sure you can dig into your piggy bank to make that wager.

      If thats still too much for you then I guess I will have to bet something else. How about one of your pokemon cards?

    2. Re:talk to me when you get out of high school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can you do you ranting in german?

      It reminds me of the rallys in the good old days..

    3. Re:talk to me when you get out of high school by Red+Avenger · · Score: 1

      Sprechen Sie Deutsch? Nein? Wie bist due ein krankenschafter!

      Ja woll!

  231. My Xbox by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

    Well, after the last two weeks of hovering and roaming around the local Toy's R Us playing with the various games, I now own an Xbox. I can't say that I like Microsoft for the various OS stumbles or their constant legal battles, but as a console, and for what you get with it, it's pretty damn fun.

    Nuff talking... back to Halo. :-)

  232. well... by ebbv · · Score: 1


    it's not like any of the consoles are quiet.

    you can build a pc to be quiet, it just takes a little effort because there's not much demand for it. :/ though i bet people would want it if they knew they could have it. they've just accepted computers == noisey (especially powerful ones!).. kinda like it used to be the norm that cars had to pollute a lot and get bad mileage.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:well... by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Yes, and some of the STBs are starting to be fanless, which makes them great for hacking into what I want. Indeed, it looks like the Allwell and RealMagic stuff is on the right track: hardware decoding of compute-intensive MPEG2 that doesn't need active cooling and is already close to what I want. Of course, because of low demand, and a niche market (hotel VOD), they tend to be pricy: around $500 without hard disk or DVD).

      Didn't know that gaming consoles were noisy (I don't own one). I will grant that fancy 3d graphics rendering will probably require an actively-cooled graphics chip for the forseeable future. While I have seen monster copper passive heatsinks for them, they haven't reviewed well.

      Ironically, the closest thing I have now to an STB is my Sony DTC-HD100 Satellite/Terrestrial HDTV receiver which has a fan in it that is on all the time.

      --
      You could've hired me.
  233. yeah, ns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who gives a f about nationalism. nationalism is like religious fundamentalism ... all it leads to is hate

  234. Netscape 6 OS X by xhypertensionx · · Score: 1

    Actually, Netscape 6 for OS X is so great, that I'm actually making the switch.

    IT IS FAST!!!

    On my iMac 233 here at work with IE 5, loading this story took five minutes, and pretty much froze my computer while it was doing it.

    On my G4 867 at home, it would probably take 45 seconds to a minute in IE. I'm not exactly sure though, because I use Netscape for OS X there, and it loads in about THREE TO FOUR SECONDS. That is raw and uncut, nested.

    So, Netscape isn't dead yet. (At least on the Mac)

    --

    1. Re:Netscape 6 OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 minutes? you'd have gotten a timeout from the server. and even if the page is loaded completely first, and rendered later (which isn't the case) then my only assumption is that MacOS sucks complete ass.

      Even a damn minute on a 867MHz is way too long... Konqueror renders slower than MSIE, and even beats the 1 minute easily.

    2. Re:Netscape 6 OS X by simp7264 · · Score: 1

      The problem with your IE is that your using a Mac, get a PC problem solved!

      Also Netscape lost the war, not the battle the war. They are not dead, but they are gathering their wounded and heading home in a hummiliating defeat because the were on top for a long time.

    3. Re:Netscape 6 OS X by gqgreg · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with Mac hardware and OS? I have used both, and I prefer Macs to PCs/Windows. I've found that most people familiar with both prefer Mac, and those who categorically dismiss Macs do so only because they know little about it, or they think the design is too 'cheesy' or, for you homophobes, too 'gay'. whatever. I've spent too much time on this post...

      --
      Powerbook G4/1.5GHz 12", Toshiba Satellite 1135-S1554
    4. Re:Netscape 6 OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. Its not Mac OS, dipshit, its a slower computer (the iMac).

      Again, I didn't time it on my 867. But I know its hella fast with Netscape.

      I doubt your OS is better than X. What are you using, redhat 4?

    5. Re:Netscape 6 OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt that your M$ OS and your shitty PC can load pages faster than Netscape 6 on my OS X G4.

  235. How long until an RIAA lawsuit? by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    A link to an NY Times article from paranoic's post guided me to a pretty funny statement.


    Originally music executives were less worried about artists not getting paid than about the potential for Xbox to become a new Napster, since it has a large hard drive and online capabilities. But in a statement prepared for this article Microsoft said that though music could be stored on the hard drive, it could not be copied on "CD's, MP3's or any other devices."


    Anyone want to take odds on how long this will last?

    It seems to me that Xbox (hard drive, ethernet) + broadband == hardware p2p client. Anyone want to take a wager on how long it takes for Gnutella and Audio Galaxy clients to start showing up?

    Too bad it doesn't have video capture . . .

    Regards,

    -l

  236. XBox Availability by GuntherAEPi · · Score: 1

    Hmmm....FYI, I ran out during lunch and stopped by both Gamestop and MediaPlay (here in the Rochester, NY AKA Hell on Earth area) Gamestop was only selling them to preorders and they didn't have the DVD controllers in yet, MediaPlay offered to sell me one, but it was in the form an atrocious bundle (I had a preorder w/ EB that I canceled because I decided against a bundle) that consisted of 3 games, a memory card (please tell me what the point is...it's got a hard drive!) and an additional controller. Anyone else have any availability stories?

    1. Re:XBox Availability by BlizzardGroupie · · Score: 1

      a memory card (please tell me what the point is...it's got a hard drive!)

      I thought the same thing at first, but then I realized that it's so you can save a game and bring it to a friends house or something like that. I suppose not everyone has broadband to make use of the Ethernet port (not that it matters now until MS gets the network for it up).

      I don't know of any place selling an XBOX outside of a bundle. If you are able to just get the console as a walk-in at the store, then buy a lottery ticket cause your karma is really high today. Other than that, I noticed this morning that Yahoo was selling XBOX bundles off their homepage this morning. I don't know if that's still going on though.

      --
      /* No comment */
    2. Re:XBox Availability by humanasset · · Score: 1

      Best Buy is selling them unbundled for $300.

  237. (sigh) by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

    Yeah...and we all play games cause we are zombies. and they have a monopoly, because they secretly own Sony, and those two companies have pretty much split the US videogame market. YOu are trying to be cool by being anti-anti-ms. get a life. Be real. See that this company is evil. Watch dancemonkeyboy, and try not to get scared. This company is planning on rolling over Nintendo and Sony and making the videogame market another MS monopoly. I don't like the sound of that. anyways, read the salon article, before you post, and then think about it. peace.

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
  238. The thing that scares me... by Control-Z · · Score: 1


    The XBox is from Microsoft. MS isn't all bad, but I BET there will be show-stopping bugs found in the OS. And how are you going to update the OS? Is it on the HD, or is it loaded from ROM?

    1. Re:The thing that scares me... by cybercrap · · Score: 1

      It is most likely on flash rom. This would give the most reliable and fastest access. Also it would give the ability to upgrade it from an image on your hd. So in otherwords it would be just like your bios. Course, if the flash fux up, your screwed. If they put it on the hd, then any schmuck could accidently delete it, or maybe there will be xbox virii for d/l on the net.

    2. Re:The thing that scares me... by Hidyman · · Score: 1

      I'm certain that the OS is on each Game disc, when the game loads, it loads the OS.
      At least that's how the DC did it.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me ...
    3. Re:The thing that scares me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ROM contains Windows 2000 Embedded which is enough for the dashboard and the bootstrap. The game media contains all of it's necessary libs statically links in the image, so it doesn't rely on anything stored on the console. This is done not only to ensure one little problem doesn't propogate forever across systems but so that advances in DirectX can be immediately applied to the new batches of games released for the console.

  239. A little early to judge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The author of this review is basing all his Xbox comments on the limited selection of games that the Xbox currently has, yet bases all his GameCube comments on games that are due out in the future. This doesn't seem fair, since Xbox was only launched today - at least give it a chance, or be a little less biased towards to GameCube and meantion some of the great games that are due out soon on the Xbox!

    1. Re:A little early to judge? by hether · · Score: 1

      First, its not a review at all! It hardly talks abou the XBox. I thought that the Game Cube comments were unfair as well and that the author was very unreasonably biased towareds the Playstation 2. He only mentioned 3 or so Game Cube titles in the whole thing.

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  240. it is somewhat chicken and egg by ebbv · · Score: 1


    but ethernet support has been a known standard feature of the x-box yet few games are coming out with support for it..

    IMHO, the types of games that work well on consoles do not lend themselves to WAN play. you already have LAN capability on the PSX2, and that works great (playing Gran Turismo 3 on two or more TVs, etc.)

    being able to put your console on the internet is not a reason to buy it, IMHO. i'm also not interested in loading mediocre media onto it to get mediocre playback. i have a top-of-the-line DVD player for a reason. :)
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  241. Statistics by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

    Rather than point to FUD just as you did, go on google and do a search for fun things like Pentium 3 700MHz benchmarks versus the Gecko that the gamecube has. then, check out the GeForce 2 (MX?) in the xbox, and the RAM, versus Gamecube's. Then, just to make it all worthwhile, check out real performance. To show that pure "power" doesn't matter, and it's the programming and just general design, compare games, side by side. Gamecube to Xbox to PS2. Then, think about the games taht are coming out, later..um..xbox gets halo. After that, i hear it is nothing (gamespot, among others). PS2 will rock, undoubtedly, and i predict the Gamecube will sell the most systems because of it's price and kiddie factor this Christmas.

    It's the games. Games are from developers.

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
    1. Re:Statistics by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that I'm hardly an Xbox champion (I don't own one and I haven't ordered one, and I'm in a waiting and seeing pattern). Alas here goes.

      http://www.consolewire.com/articles/item.asp?sid=2 43

      There you can see that the final gamecube has a system floating point capability of 10.5 GFLOPs. Wow that's pretty impressive isn't it? Oh wait: read the fine print. That includes the H&L 3d hardware & the MPU. Suddenly it isn't all that impressive. A stock GeForce 3 has 76 GFLOPs of floating point power. Add that to the ~3 GFLOPs of floating point power in the P3 733 and you have ~80 GFLOPs of computational power, versus the all together 10.5 of the Gamecube. Of course Gamecube fanboys will compare the 10.5 number with the P3 733 processor itself, which is absurd as floating point generally only comes into play for 3D computations, which is all handled by the enormously powered GPU in the GeForce 3 (I don't have specifics because they're tight lipped, but apparently the Xbox has a Geforce 3+. I've read that the GF3+ in the XBox yields >100GFLOPs). Wow that 10 GFLOPS just doesn't look as impressive now does it (unless of course you foolishly compare it with the P3s throughput, despite the fact that the P3 is really just a master controller directing the GPU and sound hardware in what they should do). The main memory on the Xbox is 6.4GB/s versus 2.6GB/s on the Gamecube. Looks to me like there's a pretty clear champion from a technical perspective.

    2. Re:Statistics by benad · · Score: 1

      You can have all the GFLOPS you want, they're wasted without the proper memory architecture. And for game consoles, it's the LATENCY that makes a difference, NOT the bandwidth. And for that, GC kicks X-box's bu**. (BTW, GC has on-the-fly texture compression at almost no cost).

      My point is that the GC has a much better architecture than the X-Box, and that's why it's easier to code for "out of the box".

      - Benad

    3. Re:Statistics by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      How exactly does latency matter more than bandwidth for game consoles? Latency is only of greater concern when the reads/writes are generally random, which is exactly not the case with most games where it's "read a sprite/texture here, write it there". It's exactly the scenario where memory bandwidth is everything. The nvidia chipset includes full texture compression and all of that (at no cost) just as it does for the desktop boards.

      In any case, while the xbox uses DDR DRAM SDRAM (which is already low latency and high bandwidth), the dual-memory channels ~halves the latency and doubles the bandwidth. The gamecubes marginal superiority in latency (if any in real world terms) is grossly outmatched in the bandwidth department.

    4. Re:Statistics by nealbutler · · Score: 1
      Just speaking for myself here, but...
      What the above post, and quite a few others, is doing is looking at the Xbox/PS2/Gamecube from a PCish perspective, comparing the actual hardware. For console gamers, the hardware is mostly a secondary concern; from a hardware perspective, most games will run as quickly/smoothly/nicely on any of the three consoles, because the specs have been taken into account in the games development.
      The main point for console gamers is what games are available, and what games are being developed for that console.
      BTW, can anyone tell me if the Xbox can play DVDs?

      nb

      --
      MS: ALL YOUR .BASE ARE BELONG TO US
  242. Re:A PS2 with different games--Sony ain't Netscape by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

    I agree completely with your M$ v. NS assessment. However, I don't think it is a slam dunk that XB2 > PS3. Sony doesn't suffer from the same problems that Netscape did (they have other problems, but who doesn't?):

    They understand the importance of...
    --sound architecture
    --standards

    ...and they have set standards successfully and over the long haul.

    --
    Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
  243. In Reply to the Update: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    READ what that image says... "XDK Launcher"

    Meaning "Xbox Developer Kit Launcher".

    Lets stop stepping on M$'s toes before errors start happening... sheesh

  244. and that doesn't mean MS is in control? by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    I agree wholeheartedly with your support for competition in the console gaming market. It fuels innovation that benefits the consumer.

    Other companies are going to expand, reject, and strengthen parts of the box with 3rd party peripherals and software.

    But in support of your theory, how does this mean Microsoft ISN'T in control. In your vision, everyone's livingroom has an xBOx, and the role of other companies is to make peripherals, software, etc. that support the xBOx. Sounds exactly like the current state of the consumer desktop PC market. Do you really want that? With a 95% marketshare, there's no legitimate 'competition' pushing microsoft to innovate its OS in ways other than how it can make more money from it (.NET for example).

    Sure, whether each ms release is actually innovative is somewhat subjective. You might ask, "What could be that isn't?" How about OS-level distributed computing? NeXT had this in 1991. You simply opened a control panel, selected the names of other computers on your network that were available to handle extra tasks, and then ANY application that needed a little 'umph' could pass out some work to those computers. Developers didn't need to add anything in their apps to take advantage of distributed computing. Sure, maybe we don't need distributed computing for most consumer apps. A dual 800 mhz G4 processor can handle most anything that any consumer would want / need to do. But it certainly would be a nice feature for crazy-ass photoshop and 3-d rendering stuff. And it would open up the potential for developers who are currently hindered by CPU expectations on the part of their customers.

    I'm not saying NeXT was better for its distributed computing functionality. It's just an example of a feature that hasn't been implemented because there's no competitive pressure on ms to implement it. The only think irking ms right now is how it can squeeze more money out of these wallets-with-legs called its customers. Do we want that in the console market as well? I certainly don't.
  245. Cheap console + MMORPG = $$$ by Spooticus · · Score: 1

    an ethernet connection on a console isn't some gaming messiah. there are currently no games which i could see benefitting from this on any console, nor any in the future. same with having a hard drive.

    Holy cow... There is one very powerful incentive to include these features on a console. MMORPGs are very popular, and have turned out to produce quite a bit of revenue. I haven't played it, but apparently Phantasy Star Online is very popular. The first company to bring a real MMORPG to a wide user base is going to win BIG!

    Consoles have a far larger market penetration than PCs when talking about the gaming market. There's a huge untapped potential here for revenue. And frankly, I think MMORPG will be the killer app for online console gaming.

    Regards,
    Spooticus

  246. Loss leader by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    It's only an advantage to them if you buy the games. The just the parts in these puppies are worth far more than $300, albeit not in large quantity purchases, but either way M$ still loses with every hardware sale. Do I smell another "NetPliance Iopener" on the horizon? Except this one has a guaranteed supply due to the strength of its backer! So what we need is for someone to hack the Xbox sufficiently to make it easy to load Linux. Then someone needs to reverse engineer the NVidia chipset to gain access to 2D, 3D, and any video / mpeg2 related functionality.

    1. Re:Loss leader by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

      Cool, so pub the specs tomorrow, ok?

      Should be just in time for those buying ...

      --
      --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
    2. Re:Loss leader by Ogerman · · Score: 2

      It not an unknown platform, it's practically commodity components. The Xbox uses a standard Intel Pentium III and an IDE hard drive. So it's not a matter of "make linux run on it" it's a matter of taking it apart and getting around any weird bios / bootloader that it may use. Being that it's pretty much a Windows box, I doubt they could have changed much without breaking alot of things. As for the Nvidia chipset, the 2D support ought to be fairly easy. Once again, I doubt they completely designed a new 2D engine from the ground up when they already have the successful TNT/GeForce chips to work from. It is quite possible that the existing 2D NVidia driver in XFree86 may work with little or no modification. 3D is a whole 'nuther story of course. But hey, maybe the cheap hardware will inspire someone to finally clean-room reverse engineer Nvidia's stuff since they have so rudely refused to give the XFree people any documentation. And there's nothing illegal about that. It's just a pain.

      Incurr the wrath of Microsoft? Do you really think they would stand a chance given their public opinion is in the toilet these days? Just what they'd need.. a grassroots underdog martyr on a shaky legal case.

  247. hmm by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

    Well, I can design, build, and ship a PC (w/o monitor), for about $400. That includes Athlon 1.2C, 30 gig hard drive, 300W PS, good case, keyboard and mouse by Logitech. All from Newegg.com. A superior site, in my opinion. And with that system, i'm sure I could compete with your GF3 enough with my GF2-GTS enough where the gameplay and graphics would be about the same.
    No, the beauty of consoles is their ease of use, price, game libraries (no myamoto, ever, for pc, unless you ROM it), portability (except the XBOX), pop-in-a-game-and-play, multiplayer (on one tv), and again, price...no expensive monitor...

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
    1. Re:hmm by simp7264 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't include a NVidia G-force 3 though

  248. I don't agree. by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

    True enough that MS currently dominates, but I think that everyone can agree that that was due to illegal practices on Microsoft's part.

    Not really. In fact the whole Netscape thing seems to be
    one of the few cases where MS fought fairly.
    MS beat Netscape because Netscape allowed their browser to stagnate, while MS made huge leaps on theirs.
    Netscape got complacent, and lost the market because of it.
    It wasn't the bundling of IE that killed NS, it's because NS's browser sucked in comparison with IE.

    C-X C-S

    1. Re:I don't agree. by atomray · · Score: 1

      Well, the Justice department and states have made microsoft's practices w.r.t. netscape the crux of the antitrust lawsuit. The courts have, up to this point, agreed. This is what I mean when I think we can agree that it wasn't the technical merits that won the browser war. I'm not sure why you think that they fought fairly...

      I wouldn't agree that netscape got complacent - imho, they got desperate and released, repeatedly, before they had something worth releasing.

      But, arguing over the browser wars is overdone. I just wanted to point out that although there were some confusing name changes, Netscape 5 more or less coexists with the branded Netscape 6. And, it's a decent browser, imho.

      --
      take your sig and shove it
    2. Re:I don't agree. by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      This is true if by 'complacent' you mean totally out of money due to unfair pressure by Microsoft.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    3. Re:I don't agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many would argue that giving it away for free, bundling it with their OS, and not allowing computer vendors to remove it is not competing fairly.

  249. i'm apprehensive about this by ebbv · · Score: 1


    i don't think these types of games work that well on consoles, i think they're quite a bit better on PCs. most of the market for this type of game are geeks too (at least the ones i met in my brief stint with EverQuest.)

    i'd be interested to see the size of the user base for POS vs. EverQuest/Asheron's Call/etc.

    we'll see though.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  250. oi vey.. by ebbv · · Score: 1


    this is the last time i'm replying to this thread..

    first off see my reply to a guy higher up in this thread about MMORPGs on consoles. MS has one already it's called Asheron's Call :P

    as i've said (also in other places in this thread), i do not think most games that are good on WANs (ie the INTARWEB) work well on consoles.

    these being FPS and MMORPGs and games like diablo, the console versions of these games are always far inferior to their PC siblings.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  251. My plan for the XBOX by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

    Here is something I said earlier, but it deserves repeating:
    "my favorite quote from the [salon] article is this: 'The company is taking a substantial loss on every Xbox sale.' Music to my ears. I might buy one, and HALO, and then Linux it into a super nintendo-playing emulator (laughter, more laughter)...hmm...anyone up for some madden '94? Legend of Zelda? I love ROMS. ohh...ohh, Final Fantasies! playstation emulation! CHRONO TRIGGER ON XBOX! It's a beautiful thing...I love how its a pc...hmmm...ohh....ohh...i'm just rolling in laugher. ha. Not to mention the viruses..."

    By viruses I was referring to a comment I had made, that since the xbox has permanent storage, is built by MS, and has Internet (and thus probably email by microsoft) functionality, it will probably be the first console in history to get viruses. Just a funny thought.

    peace.

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
  252. You've never been here before by r41nm4n · · Score: 1

    For those that are interested, check out the demo.

  253. Found that jpeg by renehollan · · Score: 2
    --
    You could've hired me.
  254. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  255. Performance may not be perfect but it'll work by maynard · · Score: 1

    The issue is optimizing the X driver for GL performance on the PS2, which is hardware dependent no matter what GPU you're coding for. I imagine it's likely that performance may not be as good on the PS2 as writing hand assembly. That said, I'm sure it would be good enough considering that FlightGear runs perfectly fine on my Dual PPRO 200 with a PCI Voodoo 3 video card.

    Honestly, the idea of providing a cross platform development and gaming environment between the PS2 and Xbox is pretty cool. FlighGear would be an excellent way to show off Linux and it's wide range of hardware support.

  256. microsoft robbing musicians? by evacuate_the_bull · · Score: 1

    i just stumbled across this article on nytimes.com - sorry if it's already been posted.

    the article mentions how microsoft picked up some small bands and used their music on the games without paying the bands or the labels. microsoft explains that the promotional exposure that the bands will get from the games is reparation enough. however, the games fail to mention the names of the bands and the titles of the songs that are in the games! so how do you know who these artists are?? ... sounds like bullying, at least to me.

    article also mentions how some fear that the xbox (with it's hard drive and internet capabilities) could become a major haven for pirated videos and music, although they also note that this data could NOT be burned onto cds (so i guess that makes it ok?)

    it's an interesting read. check it out: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/15/arts/music/15POP L.html

    --
    Satanists get good grades too...suspiciously good grades
  257. Re:A PS2 with different games--Sony ain't Netscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sony? Understand the importance of standards?

    what exactly is its memory stick?

  258. never fear, xbox comes to PC in 6 months by gol64738 · · Score: 1

    never fear folks,
    the xbox technology is nothing more than a nextgen graphics processor and high paid game companies.

    so, instead of NVIDIA releasing their nextgen graphics card to the gaming market, they signed a deal with microsoft to keep it 'under wraps'. next, microsoft pays big dollar to game companies to develop exclusively for the nextgen graphics processor. so, now you have a game console with technology that no one has....yet.

    i'm sure the deal NVIDIA signed with microsoft won't keep their nextgen stuff proprietary for long. there's probably some clause that says that after 6 months NVIDIA will be allowed to deliver this new technology to the market.

    so, microsoft has a fantastic console, not because of microsoft. it's because they sabotaged the computer game market. whoop de doo.

  259. Re:Wow... CompUSA Can Really Have an X-Box Fest No by defile · · Score: 2

    That is kind of peculiar. The local Software Etc. has their PS2 demo machines turned off also.

    It could very well be Microsoft demanding this. But perhaps store owners are just trying to get people to concentrate on X-Box products for the moment.

  260. Re: I think you need to look at more PS2 titles... by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    For starters, how about "Twisted Metal Black"?
    To this game's credit, you really can drive your car around anywhere on the "playing field". When you're stopped from driving any further, it's because there's a real barrier there, such as a chain-link fence or a building. None of that "Star Wars" game concept of "pan a little bit to the left or to the right, but we'll stop you here because we didn't want to develop more scenery past this point".

    Also, you seem to completely discount all of the sports titles for PS2, which are probably among the most played games on consoles, period. Many a console (of all types) has been purchased mainly so people can compete in a round of NHL Hockey or Football.

    Really, I think the overall complaint that "everything seems like you're watching scenery scroll towards you" can be argued equally for PC games. How many Doom/Quake/UT remakes do we need on the PC anyway?

    When you compromise by only providing a joystick type controller and not a full-blown keyboard, you automatically limit the genres of games suitable for the system. I think the PS2 and all other consoles serve their intended purpose very well. Considering a low-res TV set is the primary display device, you can't cram lots of text on the screen anyway. What other types of games do you have in mind to put on one?

  261. Interesting Oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone notice the lack of optical/coaxial audio output? For a console aimed at people with LOTS of money and a serious addiction for having the best, it seems like a major oversight. So much for watching DVD and playing Dolby Digital games in 5.1 channel out of the box. Sigh...

  262. Oh dear... by karmawarrior · · Score: 1

    So, if you modify an X-Box so it is no longer operationally equivalent, but runs Linux instead, does it become an Ex-X-box?

    And if you install a GUI on your Linuxified X-Box, does it become an X-Ex-X-Box?

    And if you then use your GUIified Linuxified X-Box for surfing adult web sites, does it become an XXX-X-Ex-X-Box?

    --
    KMSMA (WWBD?)
    1. Re:Oh dear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't.

  263. I do agree... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

    I would argue on Pope Slackman's behalf that Microsoft _did_ play fairly on this issue.

    I think the whole bundling argument is just so much horse hocky. Does Ford compete unfairly against Blaupunkt because their cars and trucks come with stereos installed? I have never heard an argument that draws any real distinction between this example and Microsoft bundling useful tools with their OS. Why didn't people complain about WordPad, or Minesweeper, or edlin?! After Dark managed to overcome the fact that Windows 3 came with built in screensavers because they offered something more. It's not Microsoft's fault that they wrote a better browser. (Of course, it is their fault when they strong-armed OEMs into not letting _them_ bundle Netscape, but let's face it, if Netscape was good enough, they would have figured out a way to overcome customers' reluctance to switch from the default.)

    In any event, this was clearly a case of Netscape not being able to cut it technically and being a cry-baby because there was already a groundswell over the fact that Microsoft has done many other unfair things. Of course, anyone with brains realized this around 1990, but by the time it reached the courts it really didn't matter anymore.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:I do agree... by scenic · · Score: 2
      I would argue against you...

      Does Ford put it's car dealers out of business if they replace the Ford factory special with a Blaupunkt?

      When you have a monopoly and threaten resellers with pulling their license, you effectively put them out of business. Replacing the "stereo" as you put it, shouldn't have such dramatic repercussions.

      Microsoft did actually do this to Compaq, all because Compaq removed the IE icon from the desktops on their Presarios. Gateway (see previous link) also had Microsoft withold a license renewal because of ongoing negotiations over whether Gateway could have their products boot directly into a Gateway-customized version of Navigator.

      Please don't try to revise history.

      Sujal

      --

      politics, food, music, life: FatMixx

    2. Re:I do agree... by atomray · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on the bundling, to me, it only makes sense to do that kind of integration, looking at it from a technical perspective. On the other hand, as far as the strong arming, when a company as large as MS wrestles with what was essentially a startup at the time, I don't agree that NS should have been expected to 'figure out a way...'.

      I won't take the 'anyone with brains' comment personally :)

      --
      take your sig and shove it
    3. Re:I do agree... by aussersterne · · Score: 4

      Bullshit. Customer buys a computer, it comes with a browser RIGHT NOW: Microsoft Internet Explorer. Netscape 3/4 is 5-6 hours away on a 14.4k modem, IF the customer can stay connected that long, IF they understand how to save files and find what they've saved afterward, and IF they're comfortable launching an installer.

      I personally dealt with this problem on the phone with multiple individuals who wanted Netscape between '95 and '98 but just didn't have the means to get it, and their OEM couldn't install it for them because of Microsoft's tactics. In the end, they all throw up their hands and just use IE 3/4 because that's what they had available and they've got better things to do for a week than try to figure out how to satisfy their browser preference.

      Then '98 comes out and even people with 32MB memory who had managed to download Netscape under '95 find that they can't "unload" IE, meaning that on their 32MB low-proc slow-disk machines with W'98 Netscape is DOG-SLOW while IE is still usable. End of game.

      Not every guy on earth was a techie with a T1 back in '95 through '98 when the switch was happening. Most of the people in the marketplace at the time are CONSUMERS without the knowledge or the technical means to download and install Netscape alongside IE, much less figure out how to change registry entries, etc. to make Netscape the default browser even if sufficient hardware/bandwidth/install skill are available.

      I'm not arguing about whether MSIE's win was "fair" or not, but it certainly was not purely on the basis of technical browser merit.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    4. Re:I do agree... by theancient2 · · Score: 1

      If the customer buys a computer RIGHT NOW and it comes with a 14.4 modem, that customer has other issues.

    5. Re:I do agree... by _Splat · · Score: 1

      > Does Ford compete unfairly against Blaupunkt because their cars and trucks come with stereos installed?

      Bad analogy. Ford does not control 90% of the car market, so it's choice of stereo systems to include does not harm Blaupunkt or the consumer. If Ford did control 90% of the car market, it would be likely that consumers would be forced to by a Ford for some other reason (Price, part compatibility, or such), and if Ford was like Microsoft, Ford dealers would not be able to substitute Blaupunkt stereos into the cars that they sell, in effect closing Blaupunkt out of 90% of the new car market.

      --
      -Splat
    6. Re:I do agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) The worst thing Microsoft did was cut Netscape's ISP channels (by not only offering IE for free, but *paying off* big ISPs to drop Netscape)

      Sure, eventually people bought new PCs with a web browser, but there was still this huge Internet adoption curve that didn't get NS with their internet signup.

      2) The US automakers have been sued many times by 3rd party stereo companies, and it's essentially a draw now. Bad example.

    7. Re:I do agree... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      It wasn't meant for anyone here, although there's no surplus of brains on /. ;-)

      I was referring to the fact that the whole "Microsoft Monopoly" idea only hit big time in the courts and the media around 2-3 years ago, even though, when following people like Andrew Schulman or looking at cases like DR-DOS, it was obvious they were playing monopolistic hardball many, many years ago.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  264. love the comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can online gaming save the xbox, or any console for that matter...No, not if you play against PC players with mouse/keybrd combo, you'll never be anything but a newbie gib. If you don't think so look for any [iam] on a UT server and ask for a demo.

  265. How soon to run Xbox games on a regular computer? by catslaugh · · Score: 1

    So, is anyone working on making it possible to run Xbox games on a regular computer? If they're sharing a lot of technology with Windows, hopefully it should just be a matter of getting appropriate joystick hardware and having compatible video and sound cards. (And how long before we can run Xbox games under WINE on Linux?) I don't consider it worth my while to buy an Xbox just to play Oddworld, but I might as well make sure my next computer purchase is capable of running the games in some boot configuration.

    --
    "Before enlightenment: sharpen claws, catch mice. After enlightenment: sharpen claws, catch mice."
  266. I predict a major flop in japan as well by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

    I knew it was going to happen when i read this:

    Unbelieveable quote:
    "We want to first succeed in the United States and then ride the wave of popularity into the Japanese market,"

    It is obvious that microsoft is completely oblivious to how the gaming market works.

  267. I withhold no judgement. I did play it. by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

    Here's a review I wrote on the thing when I messed with it at E3, and then added onto once I played with it again at the Tokyo Game Show, and screwed with it when I could find a working kiosk.

    XBox Review

    Scroll to the bottom of the review for all the new info.

    Here's a first look review of Dead or Alive 3, as well.

    DOA3 Preview

    --
    Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  268. Mainstream launch titles != Xbox sucks by JabaAdams · · Score: 1

    The Salon article wasn't a review of the Xbox, it was essentially a review of the launch titles. I agree that there aren't any truly ground-breaking titles, but they will come. Gotta say, I want to play Cel Damage, though.

    The article almost entirely ignored the fact that developers have been quite positive about their Xbox experiences. Contrast this to what many developers are saying about the PS2's arcane internal structure.

    Remember the original Playstation? It took off because Sony provided developers with an excellent platform. Also, the games improved over time. Compare the quality of the PS1 launch titles with the most recent PS1 games - big difference!

    If developers fall in love with the Xbox, then eventually they will create great, innovative games for it. It's a nice piece of hardware, with huge potential. The fact that the launch didn't live up to all the marketing hype shouldn't surprise anyone.

    Shinyfish Software

    1. Re:Mainstream launch titles != Xbox sucks by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >The article almost entirely ignored the fact that developers have been
      quite positive about their Xbox experiences. Contrast this to what
      many developers are saying about the PS2's arcane internal structure.

      >
      >
      As far as I can tell the only people having problems developing for the PS2 are basically worthless US game firms who only sell PC/Intel versions of their crap to begin with. Personally I couldn't care less if Quake or UT was never released on the PS2 because I wouldn't buy it anyway.

  269. Hmm .. by SpeelingChekka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In spite of the fact that I already think that people are incredibly stupid, and in spite of seeing decades of evidence of the incredible stupidity of people on probably at least a weekly basis, stories like this (these eBay auctions) still somehow manage to boggle my mind and make me shake my head in wonder and disbelief. I find myself searching for possible rational explanations. So far the only explanation I can come up with that makes sense to me is that perhaps the bidders on these auctions were mostly foreigners with very poor English skills (possibly having recently moved e.g. to the US), who would not only easily have misunderstood the descriptions (understanding probably mostly just the main keywords), but would themselves (in a sort of naive trusting of people, and in good faith) never have believed or even considered that anyone would attempt such ridiculous auctions. If that was the case, I wonder if there would be any legal implications. Probably not, but still, if somebody deliberately and knowingly conned a naive immigrant with poor English skills, it seems a bit on the shady side.

  270. Lies and more Lies about console gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One problem that I see on this forum is that people can be so blind and so stupid.

    As far as Microsoft being a lemmings mentality, there is tons of that with the linux crowd here.

    I wouldn't be suprised if most of you sick fucks masturbated to Linux. Idiots

    The XBOX, PS2, Gamecube etc are all computers. Sure the PS2 might have a general chip that does high-end math, but its still a computer.

    Nintendo has Rogue Squadron, but thats about all they have going on. 99 percent of the games are games that were on the N64 and are kiddy games.

    The PS2 numbers that were released are horseshit... 20 Million PS2's my ass! Sony does a good job of lying. Most of those numbers are SHIPPED NOT SOLD. Microsoft could have 20 Million shipped by 2003, big deal. Its sold through numbers that count. What this means to the mental midgets on here is that those are the consoles that are sold to consumers.

    The other part of that 20 Million number also includes the 50 percent of returns as PS2's fail hardware wise. Go to http://psx2central.com and find out for yourself. You have a 50 percent chance of getting a defective PS2 and you may be able to play games for awhile, but eventually you will need to get a new one. This is fact so shut up and listen for a change.

    I am tired of all the lies and crap, find out for yourself and don't be so biased against Microsoft.

    Instead of being a closed minded jealous biggot, maybe you should get out more and know that there is more to life than masturbating about linux.

  271. Wrong Game by Nf1nk · · Score: 1
    You are mistaking GT3 for GTA3 an easy mistake to make UNTIL YOU PLAY THEM BOTH.


    GT3; Grand Turisimo 3 masterpiece in racing simulation (even if you can't put a scratch in the purty cars)


    GTA4; Grand Theft Auto 3 super violent thug simulator also very fun for that reptile part of your brain. and worth the price of the PS2

    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  272. Not Sold in HongKong by bstadil · · Score: 1

    That's excatly the reason they will not be sold in China/Hong Kong. Look at This TheRegister Story from today. Quote Microsoft's Xbox gaming console will not be sold in Hong Kong or China for the foreseeable future due to the rampant piracy problem in the region. The company is selling the actual hardware at a loss - as much as $125 per box, according to Merrill Lynch - and plans to recoup profits on its software titles, much like the razor blade or printer cartridge industry. UNquote

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  273. X-box and PS2 virtually the same? by Traa · · Score: 1

    *sniffle*

    Maximum resolution (cinematics)

    X-box: 1920x1080
    PS2: 1280X1024


    Maximum resolution with 2 x 32bpp frame buffers + Z buffer (gameplay)

    X-box: 1920x1080
    PS2: 640x480

    1. Re:X-box and PS2 virtually the same? by sconest · · Score: 1

      Big resolutions. If only a PAL on NTSC television could handle this.

      --
      Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
    2. Re:X-box and PS2 virtually the same? by be-fan · · Score: 2

      But the XBox has a VGA output (and can interface to HDTV) so you CAN have hi-res console gaming!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:X-box and PS2 virtually the same? by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >But the XBox has a VGA output (and can interface to HDTV) so you CAN
      >have hi-res console gaming!
      >
      >
      And just how many people are actually stupid enought to buy a HDTV set?

    4. Re:X-box and PS2 virtually the same? by be-fan · · Score: 2

      What's wrong with HDTV? At the high end, it carries a price premium of less than $1000. You can get a good Sony HDTV 53" for $2500 while a comparable Sony non-HDTV runs around $1800. Not a bad deal, considering a TV easily lasts you five or six years. Plus, there is a lot more programming these days, and (with new DVD players) DVDs look really good on HDTV.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  274. Then don't play this thing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got back from playing Halo on an Xbox at Gamestop...man did that suck! First of all, the controller is just HUGE. Button placement is awful, you really have to reach far away from the right analog stick to hit anything. And I still say fps were NOT meant to be played on a console...control is much too imprecise. Halo looked great, but movement/firing was just frustrating. I'm waiting 'til it comes out on PC.

  275. Someone fix this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give this dude the "+1 funny" he deserves. Somebody saw the last line, "Microsoft for life, babe", and thought he was pro-MS.

    Just my opinion,
    Shrek Jr.

  276. I can help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Burn your
    Atari out oyou are Lookpreferred linux of getting to tGet your it..
    Burn your That is the closest getting of it..
    That is the getting to tGet your closest getting to tGet your Atarhallo hallo i out oyou are f the closet o version onto a CDR.
    Get your ABurn your tari out oyou are f the getting to tGet your closet Get your Atari out oyou are f the closet and place the CD on top Linux on. poofs.

  277. If you buy an Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are no freind to Linux.
    In fact, a traitor.
    Gaming addiction is no excuse.
    give MS no revenue.
    none.

  278. Are you sure? by DaTestcase · · Score: 1

    According to this, MS has stated that it is NOT progressive-scan DVD, just for the games:

    http://gamespot.com/gamespot/stories/news/0,1087 0, 2824108,00.html

  279. Ummm.... by hether · · Score: 1

    This article was supposed to be about the X Box? It was supposed to be a review?

    I'd say 1/6 of it was X-Box related and it certainly wasn't a review because the so called reviewer hadn't played any of the games! It was also primarily speculation and time spent talking about games that are coming up in comparison to other games coming up for other types of consoles. It should have been accurately labeled as a discussion of upcoming consoles and their games.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  280. What's wrong with having an anti-MS bias? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you have anything but, given their
    past, current, and from what I can see now , their
    future behaviour.
    they have earned it.
    the real question is how can you not have an Anti-
    MS bias.

  281. Running useless machines. (Offtopic) by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    You should fire it up and run SETI@home on it...

    You know, someone I worked with at my last job out on the far end of tech support hell did something like this. He actually had _two_ subnets on his home LAN to accomodate both Ethernet and Token Ring. Why token ring? Because he had some old piece of shit MCA box and only had a Token Ring card for it.

    And why was it running at all? To complete SETI work units. No other use. Bah. Waste of time.

    --saint

  282. Someone should tell that to the Japanese by Western+Light · · Score: 1

    Americans and Europeans tend to be very laisez faire (sp), but an unbelievable number of superior Western products fail in Japan because of one reason: NATIONALISM.

  283. XBox Scoop from San Diego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Okay, the scoop from San Diego. 20 people showed up for the XBox launch at Software Etc. (not too surprising, the economy is tanking here and people are too scared to go outside). The funniest comment I heard was from somebody who hadn't bought a game unit since the SNES, he was going to buy the XBox because it came from Microsoft so "it was the best". He didn't even know what games were available. Consumers are Bill Gate's bitch.


    Halo is everything I thought it would be (and almost 1/3 as good as the hype). Maybe the best FPS I have ever played (good story and nice pacing).


    The one thing that makes me wonder was the fact that a manager at a local EB this morning told me that he lost money on every XBox sale. This struck me as being odd, I knew Microsoft lost money on each until (shipping cost alone must be high, those things weigh a ton ;)) but I didn't think the retailer would lose money as well? Anybody have the story on this?


    BTW: both stores had about half a dozen GameCubes for sale, but nobody seamed to care.

  284. PS-2 Linux, Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Yes, I want a console linux PS-2 connected
    to my lan and the TV. Check email during
    commercials, check on the that long
    compilation and most importantly
    computing on a natuzzi leather couch,
    ahhhhhhhhh. Where do I sign?

  285. Xbox with rear projection TV? by 0ptiK+nERVe · · Score: 1

    Could I plug an xbox with the hdtv adapter on a rear projection HDTV?

    I have heard it could damage the the tv?

    They keep mentioning it's the first console to support hdtv but most set are rear projection...

    If so I'm bound to buy a xbr....damn.

    1. Re:Xbox with rear projection TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you buy the High Definition AV pack you can. It's an adapter that plugs into the xbox and gives you component outputs. And it's not that the xbox itself will damage the tv, it's the danger of having static graphics displayed for too long (think lifebars or HUDs) that can wear out your guns unevenly. If you set the contrast low (which you should anyway) and don't play for hours and hours on end you should be fine.

  286. Wagner James Au is a gushing idiot by Von+Rex · · Score: 2

    I lost all interest in the conclusions of this article once I saw the author. Check out this previous article of his, on the game "Black & White".

    Salon review of Black & White

    There was a lot of pure hype "reviews" of this game that had nothing to do with the reality, but this is the worst one I ever read.

    Here's some quotes to give you the tone:

    • "It may be hard to believe that the future of 21st century art is represented by a giant bipedal tiger who farts, break dances and flings livestock around when he's bored. But it requires only a few hours of play in the lands of Black & White, the new PC game from Lionhead Studios and lead designer Peter Molyneux, to know that this is exactly the case. "

    • "It is a great game, and if it becomes the mass market hit it deserves to be, it should shatter the last arbitrary boundary between culture and technology. And if that happens, and its success carries over to its online versions, it might even change the world."

    • "Taken as a literary work, Black & White fits into a distinctly British sub-genre best exemplified by the works of authors such as C.S. Lewis and J.R.R Tolkien (and to a lesser extent, J.K. Rowling) who create fully-realized fantasy worlds that embody the human spirit. Black & White is their peer."

    • "What happens when your avatar is a unique and telling reflection of who you really are, and the choices you've made? .... What will happen when we interact in an online world, where everyone enters it in a similar state, wearing our souls, so to speak, on our sleeves?"



    Tell me, those of you unfortunate enough to have purchased this game, are these fair comments? I know hardly anyone who even bothered to finish it, it was so annoying, repetitive, and simple-minded. And that's not even considering the massive bugs that made it damn near impossible to play for the first six months of its release. Not that any of these things stopped Wagner James Au from transcribing his fantasies.

    I imagine his review of the X-Box has about the same level of insight and realism.

  287. xbox - The revolution just started by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's put that straight: I owned most major consoles since 1982.

    I got my xbox at midnight today. IT ROCKS.
    Basically, it's the best console ever produced. Solid and well designed. A high quality product.
    Time will tell for the software side. Meanwhile, early product show great promises.

    Face it, The revolution just started...

  288. The "rush" for X-Box by j_zero · · Score: 1

    Whe the PS2 was released, people were auctioning them on Ebay for $1500 USd (highest price I saw with a bid). I just did a quick search for the X-Box, and guess what? Quite a few people are getting less than $299 for them, and the ones that are, aren't getting much more than $300 (unbundled) for them.

  289. Who really wants the Xbox? The answer is . . . by Gallowglass · · Score: 2
    Found this late in the day, so probably too late, but since it amused me. . .


    From an article at Cnet.com about techie Christmas gifts and who wants what:


    "Executives ... 15 percent said they wanted an Xbox. ... Interestingly, executives were the only category of professionals who requested the much-hyped gaming console from software giant Microsoft."


    Weellll . . .

    We're not surprised, are we?

  290. Re: I think you need to look at more PS2 titles... by Glytch · · Score: 2

    None of that "Star Wars" game concept of "pan a little bit to the left or to the right, but we'll stop you here because we didn't want to develop more scenery past this point".

    Amen from the highest fucking rooftops. I wish Lucasarts would make another genuine flight simulator like XWA, rather than Yet Another Shitty Arcade Game like Rogue Squadron and Rogue Leader.

    Oh, silly me. Crappy arcade games take less time and less people to develop. Cheaper to make equals higher profit margin if successful and lower losses if it bombs. What could I have been thinking?

  291. not really that excited by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

    I have to say that I'm a pc gamer. I like some console games but there aren't many that make me drool like they do on the pc. sure I might be tied to Windows for games at this time but i just prefer playing games ont he pc. the other thing is that the only game thats on the xbox that i want to play is Halo. that might come to the pc/mac eventually and I'll play it then . if it doesn't then oh well. I'm not shelling that much cash for a system that has one game that I might play. Halo might be cool but its no FF7 or Tekken thsoe are the games that got me to buy a PSone.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  292. Hack the damn BOx by Technosteve! · · Score: 1

    i was staring at nude pictures of the xbox over at www.firesquad.com , and i thought to myself how can they call this thing a console! it a god dang computer. there's the fancy geforce 3 sticking out of the "gasp" motherboard of the xbox. a nice circular heatsink over the pentium III cpu. and a bunch of slots that look like pci slots and dimm slots for ram. i would of thought they would have put more time in to the xbox like the ps2. they could of intergrated some parts to reduce the fucking size of the xbox. have you seen one and hold on! it bigger then my vcr and vcd machine combined. while microsoft is trying to sell this thing as a console but to me it is a very inexpensive computer! i not so excited by the games that will be produced for the xbox but for the thought of some day may be not today maybe not tomorrow but some day (better make it soon!) some ingenius hackers out there to turn the xbox in to something usefull. like the the dreamcast linux boxes that i saw on /. the xbox is 100x more power full then the dreamcast {R.I.P} some good shit can be made of the box. here are some ideas. 1. all the talk about bewoulf clusters and supercomputing. i don't xbox super computers? 2. the nice and fancy geforce 3(?) cards in side the xbox. buy the box and turn them in to graphic farms. i know that sony are using the ps2 in boxes to do parallel graphics processing in future digital movies. 3. at 733 mhz and a 8 gig hd and a sweat ass graphix card all for the low low price of 300 dollars somebody out there better make some kind of hack so i can install so kind of operating system on the xbox maybe win xp or red hat. my two cents about the xbox. i have seen halo can't wait for it to come out for my good old computer.

    --
    Me and lunchbox here are going to kick your ass.
  293. Diversifying Markets by BarefootClown · · Score: 2

    The problem is, company profiteering notwithstanding, they're making it obvious that's all they're interested in. "Oh look! The gaming industry has lots of money! We can get some of that!"

    There's a term for this sort of behavior. You might want to write this down for future reference, so I'll wait for you to get a pencil. Ready? Good. The term is:

    capitalism

    Microsoft is expanding into a new market to try to increase profits? Say it ain't so! What, exactly, do you think is the purpose of a company? I realize that we're dealing with Microsoft, and therefore required to hate them, but seriously--companies exist to make money. You want to see expansion into a new market? Look at Sony--I have a 25 year old Sony TV. That's long before the PlayStation was a gleam in some engineer's eye. At some point after my TV was made, Sony decided to get into the game console market. Have you noticed that they now have a music division, and movie division (Sony Pictures Studios), and several other divisions not related to their previous business of building non-interactive entertainment hardware (stereos, TV's, etc.)?

    If Microsoft wants to diverisfy its business, let them. If you think about it for a bit, you'll realize that it's almost certain to be a good thing. Look at the options:

    • Xbox fails. Millions in R&D wasted. Millions more in hype wasted. MS spends big bucks, loses big--granted, a very small percentage of their total company value, but hey, a buck's a buck. Also, that R&D is useful to Sony, who will see what failed, and not make the same mistake.
    • Xbox succeeds:
      • Succeeds because it is a superior system. Market buys it in spades, other companies see it, get a kick in the pants to develop the next generation system to compete, building on the successes of the Xbox. Consumer wins. Besides, who wouldn't like to see MS succeed on merit for a change, instead of bludgeoning power? Surely we're not so bitter and cynical that we would deny them the chance to build something decent?
      • Succeeds because of hype. Market buys a few, decides that it was OK, but nothing groundbreaking. Spurs research into what would be groundbreaking; Sony, et al. look at the demographics and features, figure out what would improve it. MS becomes, in effect, Sony's R&D department, but funded by MS. (Think MS and MS-Research-South (better known as Apple Computer).) Sony develops new box with improvements.

    In any event, the introduction of a new system will create competition, driving down prices and spurring innovation. End result: consumer wins. Leave the Xbox alone, and let the market decide.

    --

    "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
    --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    1. Re:Diversifying Markets by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      Capitalism

      Wow. I'm so glad you enlightened my obviously damaged and useless brain to a word I apparently don't have in my rather meager vocabulary. On that vein, I shall levy many words and phrases upon you which also fit the situation.

      • Johny come lately.
      • New kid on the block.
      • Pissing in the pool.
      • Arrogant little bastard.

      Now, you may be well informed that these are many things that most people don't like at first. I was the new kid on many occasions, so I know it's hard. But when you're the new kid that goes around telling everyone else how much they suck, that they aren't as cool as you, and then start waving money around like it makes everything ok, you might as well get ready for the ass-whuppin' you're about to receive.

      What's that? An analogy? Sarcasm? Even, God forbid, humor? Well that tears it, I better start kicking myself in the head for even attempting such things where such concepts are painfully foreign. Notice the links to Penny Arcade? Oh wait... no, that would be far too subtle as well. Geez, I just can't win here.

      Whelp. You got me. Your vastly superior intellectual 5K|L1z0rZ have rendered me a simpering bowl of zombified jelly. I hope you're happy.

      psssst... that was supposed to be funny too.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
  294. Always after microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many people here refuse to accept things that are made by Microsoft. I'd like to see you go out and design a word processor better than Word. Sure, they've done some rude things, but that doesn't mean that Microsoft products must all suck. I don't think anyone responding here has actually used Xbox anyway, so this flaming is really kinda stupid.

  295. Green Screen of Error is from an old XDR by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    The green screen of Error that was posted with this is from an old version of XDR. It's not fair attributing errors from prerelease versions to the final product

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  296. It's called HUMOR guys by Guitarzan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Come on. The comment was a joke.

    Here...I'll explain it for you though. Every Windows owner has probably seen the BSoD. Windows is made by a little company called Microsoft. Microsoft has also started selling home game consoles. Therefore, it would be a good joke to relate the BSoD from Windows to this new console. That might be funny, huh? Don't just rant about this joke being MS-bashing. Laugh a little.

    1. Re:It's called HUMOR guys by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2

      Consider the source.

      If it was Taco or Hemos, I could take the joke. They're cool with the idea of peaceful coexistence, and they cover Microsoft fairly.

      Michael, OTOH, has consistently gone out of his way to bash Microsoft at every opportunity, even when it has meant stooping to half-truths and distortions. He can't be trusted with news, and, for me, his opinion no longer matters. Therefore, he's off my front page.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:It's called HUMOR guys by denzo · · Score: 2
      Come on. The comment was a joke.
      Yeah, kinda odd. At Slashdot, of all places, I would get my comment modded to Flamebait just for cracking a joke about MS. ;P

      Heck, I'm just as big of an MS consumer as anyone else. I own probably easily $2,000 of MS products over the past few years. Does that preclude me from being able to make fun of them? Would being an American citizen preclude someone from making fun of their president?

      Whatever...

  297. Re: slashdot groupthink by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

    We are here to think how we want, there are plenty of people neutral on MS here, plenty who pick on them for fun, and plenty who hate them with burning passion. It isn't groupthink, stop trying to get noticedby being anti-anti-MS. Yes, i know i'm replying to a troll, but someone had to do it.

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
  298. Re:A PS2 with different games--Sony ain't Netscape by geekoid · · Score: 2

    most importantly, sony has too much money for MS to go head to head wit them by selling an 'equivilent' product at a loss.
    netscape OTOH just didn't have enough money to compete against MS when MS started screwing them by giving MS away for free.
    If I had enough money to build and give away cars for free, I would eventually dominate the market. Then I could charge usage fees.
    Of course If I did that I would be shut down for unfair trade, and illegal use of an monopoly.
    But rules like that din't apply to software companies when the bush family is in office.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  299. X-box merely an agent to take over the world! by Technosteve! · · Score: 1

    i heard a wild rumor (mostly i made it up) that if you plug a x-box by a ps2 the x-box will slowly drain the power from the ps2 till the ps2 fails to function and dies. leaving the xbox the only console playable!

    --
    Me and lunchbox here are going to kick your ass.
  300. Fair... by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

    Ok. I get a little zealous sometimes, apologies.
    I recommend anyone check out the games for the systems, and do a comparison on the software, not the hardware.

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
    1. Re:Fair... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree and honestly consider a Gamecube a likely candidate to purchase mostly for my wife, who loves the Zelda style of game (I like them myself but I'm pretty attached to my computer). I totally agree that Nintendo totally owns whole genres of games, and rightly so.

  301. Short memories by Ringwraith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apparently, the guy who wrote this doesn't remember the PS2 launch. Other than SSX and Madden, there weren't any incredible games either. In fact, for the first few months I had mine, I kept wondering when the good games were going to show up. Of course, now they are showing up -- GTA3, TH3, Half-Life, MSG2 -- and more, but it took a year. I think it would be better to look a year from now and see what kind of games are around for both consoles, and then judge.

    --
    -- Hobbits suck!
  302. buy an xbox, hurt ms. by small_dick · · Score: 2

    no...let them rot on the shelf till obsolete (say, 6 mos.) *that* will hurt ms.

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
  303. Xbox crashes by llzackll · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work at a Best Buy, and our Xbox display unit freezes at least once every two hours, and we have to reset it. ( I usually leave it froze until a customer asks me to reset it, so more people can see that this thing freezes, heh heh). So far our gamecube has not froze once, we can leave it on all day with no problems. The only difference between the display units and the consumer ones is the demo units don't have the hard drive.

  304. Forget it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone's used their moderator points already. Stop trying so fucking hard to be funny.

  305. But Nerdshoe says..... by Nickovsky · · Score: 1

    NerdShoe says its the "Cock Box"...
    Console War
    =D

  306. Re:spankman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I haven't been able to find a distributor for Spankman I or II. Could you please provide a link?

    Anxiously awaiting your reply...

  307. Re:Defrag a Console? by dark_panda · · Score: 2

    There are a lot of filesystems that rarely need to be defragged. Most high performance filesystems don't really need it at all. When was the last time you defragmented a NTFS drive, or an ext2 drive? (Which is not to say it's never done, but I've never had to do it.)

    J

  308. No hardware fails if you can run Linux on it by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    No hardware fails if you can run Linux on it. Does anybody besides me think it would be terribly humorous to buy an xbox, rip out Bill's software, and run Linux instead?
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  309. OMG, that's too funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't laughed out loud for a long time. "Suddenly Everything Sucks", heh heh.

  310. Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you don't care if the games suck, as long as they look good on your 120" TV?

    Good call. I salute you.

  311. MAME on XBox by PaisleyFrog · · Score: 1

    It's already been done... http://www.otakunozoku.com/xbox/

  312. Xbox runs Linux by morgue-ann · · Score: 2, Informative
    Did I get your attention? Good. I want to clear up a few misconceptions and fish for more information. I'm interested in doing a *nix port (NetBSD or Linux), I have one or two compadres who are also skilled in the embedded arts and might have the time. Let's get on to the issues:

    LEGAL - DMCA

    There have been a few comments here that seem to seriously misconstrue what the DMCA is capable of, so let's review that then take a look at reverse-engineering case history.

    "Ella the Cat" fished for ideas on what the Microsoft team might have done to keep unauthorized software off their box, then worried about DMCA implications. "Chakat" suggested that circumventing MS's only-signed-discs-may-apply code could be a DMCA violation.

    I won't quote it all, but here's chapter 12 of the US Code. 1201(b) is what Dmitry's been charged under. It only prohibits devices that circumvent methods that "effectively protects a right of a copyright owner."

    In this case, Microsoft can claim copyright on the BIOS in the Xbox. Suppose that we remove the MS-BIOS and replace it with one that'll boot anything (L-BIOS). We've circumvented a measure that prevented running unauthorized games, but that authorization or lack of has no legal weight behind it. Microsoft must enforce it themselves by creating strong measures.

    We have to be careful that L-BIOS doesn't allow booting copies of games or we will run afoul of the DMCA.

    LEGAL - Reverse Engineering

    The Emulation FAQ AppendixB Appendix C provides a good background. Also see CASE SUMMARIES OF COMPUTER COPYRIGHT CASES and Overreaching Provisions in Software License Agreements by Michael Liberman.

    The two cases that I think are most apropos are Sega v. Accolade and Sony v. Connectix. Accolade tried to create Genesis-compatible games. Connectix tried to emulate the Playstation. Both cases were about copyrights on games that were disassembled in order to figure out how the game machine worked. The odd thing to me is that disassembling the code and creating a work that used the ideas contained therin was no problem. What Sony & Sega attacked on was making a copy of the ROM into a computer's memory to do the disassembling. The courts found (post-DMCA in the Sony case) that the copying was fair use to gain access to the ideas. Copyright only applies to the expression of those ideas in the object code of the ROM.

    Disassembling MS-BIOS to figure out how to talk to the memory, USB and hard disk controllers and create L-BIOS is perfectly legal. It's important to avoid copying MS-BIOS code directly and a clean room would be a good idea (the disassemblers send specs to the L-BIOS authors who never see the actual code), but it seems that Connectix did not employ clean room techniques and got away with it.

    TECHNICAL

    The Xbox System Software Overview says in part:

    The ROM [...] will provide the following [...] services: FAT32 file system, UDFS file system, Copy-protection support, Certificate/signature validation

    Supported media are CD, DVD, CD-RW, or DVD-R. There is no CD-R support.

    Power Up- When the user turns on the console, the system software is decompressed out of read-only memory (ROM) into random access memory (RAM). Once in RAM, the system software initializes the hardware[....]

    Media Detection- Upon power up [...] If it determines that the media [in the DVD drive] is a game, it loads the game into RAM, checks the signature of the game to verify that it is an authentic copy, then starts playing the game.

    -

    So it appears that MS-BIOS will only boot signed (presumably using strong encryption) DVDs. There are, of course, two answers to this:

    1) Replace the MS-BIOS with a more pleasant L-BIOS that'll boot anything and perhaps boot off the hard drive instead of the DVD. Loading "real" games sounds pretty hairy and I'd rather not figure out how to do that, so you won't be able to play them anymore. I'm envisioning replacing the Flash ROM (I have access to a nice Nikon binocular microscope and a Metcal soldering iron for working on surface mount parts), but there are a couple of alternatives: a) piggy-back on a 2nd ROM containing L-BIOS except for chip-select which is hooked to a switch or b) use the JTAG port to reprogram the part in-circuit (only possible with some mfg.'s parts).

    2) Figure out how to sign our own discs. This is a good excuse for me to get a DVD recorder. I'm concerned that this method is fewer steps away from a "mod chip" that plays duplicated games.

    -

    Well, that's what I've found out. I'm interested because it sounds like it'll be sort of hard. If we need to hook up a logic analyzer & watch MS's code do its thing I can handle that. I think getting Linux up & running, talking to keyboards & mice over USB & doing TCP/IP over the ethernet port shouldn't be too bad. Getting basic graphics (VGA emulation) up shouldn't be bad, but I make no promises that we'll be able to use the nVidia 3d. I'm thinking a server is a lot more likely than a nuevo-Indrema/TuxBox.

    Worst case scenario is that the chipset itself has encryption hardware built-in and it must be unlocked by the CPU before it will enable access to RAM or peripherals. I doubt they had enough time to do something that clever.

    By the way, you can reach me at morganw@yahoo.com (posting preferences not workin' for me)

  313. even more... by Creepy · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has been pulling the licensing trick since Windows 3.1.1 and maybe even before that - there once were other DOS's, not just MS-DOS. Microsoft used bundling tactics not only to make their version of DOS dominant, but also destroy all other OS's on the PC platform. I remember when manufacturers got a huge price break for only selling Windows and no other OS's. Tack on Office and you got another huge break. Microsoft was forced to stop this practice as part of an antitrust filed in the mid '90s, but no one seems to remember that (I think it was settled out of court, but those were my college years - a bit hazy :).

    But back to the original example - if Ford, offered Blaupunkt stereos it might be different, but Microsoft would build their own and only offer their factory models. They then tack the fee for the stereo onto the price of the vehicle. The Ford costs more (look at how the price went up from Win95SE to Win98) but you get a "free" factory stereo with it. To be even more realistic, Ford would then wire the stereo directly to the electrical system so it can't easily be replaced or removed without breaking the entire vehicle.

    Most of the time, though, Microsoft just starves out the competition by bundling the feature and tacking the development cost onto Windows (or server machines in the case of IIS). Netscape, Novell Netware, DR-DOS, and many others with little or no other revenue stream can't last long against the sort of "competition."

    In writing this, I realized why Microsoft hates Open Source so much - it's not that the Open Source community is a threat, it's that if the Open Source community ever becomes a threat, there's no easy way to destroy them (bundling doesn't work when the competition works for free).

  314. Re:Defrag a Console? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find I need to defrag my NTFS drive at least once a week. I dunno what SMOKE you're trying to BLOW, but using NTFS does NOT mean that fragmentation does not occur.

  315. Oh right, like this is "flamebait"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excuse me Mr. Moderator. You know, the one who moderated this post, not all of you. Can you explain how what's written here deserves "flamebait"? Please?

    1. Re:Oh right, like this is "flamebait"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free thinkers aren't welcome on this site.

  316. Sony disagrees with you by SpiceWare · · Score: 2

    The specs for the PS2 list the screen resolution as variable from 256x244 to 1280x1024. A far cry from being limited to 480i.

  317. Slashdot: Misinformation at its best! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "green screen" is from an XBox developer edition, using libraries and hardware that were not final.

    There has not been a single report of an XBox crash that I am aware of.

    In addition, how conveniently Slashdot posts one of the only reviews of the XBox that hasn't been full of jubilation and praise. Since when was Salon.com a game review site?

    Why not look at the reviews from Gamespot, Gamers.com, Firingsquad.com, Sharkyextreme.com, ign.com, or one of the countless other sites? Why? Because they all say XBox is great... and that's good for Microsoft. Anything good for Microsoft must be either:

    a.) A lie.
    b.) A lie.
    c.) A lie.
    d.) Done through anti-competitive action.

    Give me a break. Take your heads out of your asses.

  318. What an Idiot by ioman1 · · Score: 1

    It is very clear in this article that these analysts do not know what they are talking about. Afer today there is no question in my mind that Xbox will be a success. Has Microsoft ever lost at anything they put their full weight into? Not likely. People will be converging from the high cost of computer gaming and move to the Xbox as a cheaper, beter alternative. The analysts mention in the Salon article are traditionalists, following whats tried and true not whats state-of-the-art and new.

  319. Re: slashdot groupthink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it's not so much the site, but rather the type of people who frequent it -- this site, owned by a Linux company, widely seen as being a site for Linux/open-source advocates... yes, I see how there's no bias here.

  320. Well, I guess IIS 5.0 is FINALLY tested, and FAILS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    LOL - www.xbox.com is DOWN :-)

    Well, at least at 6:12PM EST

  321. one exception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference is, I've never heard of Bob. Everybody and their kitchen sink has heard of XBOX.

  322. Actually, the Green X reminds me more of Alien by zrk · · Score: 1

    as you peer in, one of those facehuggers leaps out and deposits an alien hatchling that has to burrow its way out of your chest.

  323. Xbox Resolution by Sentry23 · · Score: 1

    As for Xbox game resolution goes, it still is all up to the developer to support higher resolution graphics modes. Progressive scan will give a Lot more pixels to draw per second, and I wonder if users will accept lower res/lower poly models as a trade of for higher resolutions. Since the Xbox does not support VGA output, progressive scan support will stay a niche market for quite some time, and I fail to see why a developer would put much extra effort in this option.
    Nice for spec sheets, but the extra resolution is not without some major drawbacks.

    Sentry23
    -no brain, no pain

  324. A *real* driving simulator. by MisterPo · · Score: 1

    The problem with the Gran Turismo series is that it is *not* a driving simulator. It is merely an arcade racer with some realistic elements in it. Even the designer Kazunori Yamauchi says that.

    Dont get me wrong I love playing the game but it is so different from a real-life experience it is untrue. Things like damage represenatation (apart from the token gesture of tyres), unrealistic driving lines, and being able to "catch-up" after crashes is pure fantasy. Hurtle into a corner at full speed and "bounce" of the car holding the proper line is a favourite trick I observe.

    For myself and a lot of true gamers, the best simulation will always be Sega's Ferrari 355 Challenge. This game was not too popular in the arcades as it was *too* difficult, ie. realistic. Having only one car that modelled so accurately turned off a lot of people, have a minor scrape and you were lucky to finish anywhere decent. Crash and you were nearly guaranteed last place. I have a friend who races Ferraris in Macau and he says that the feel was perfect.

    Regards,

    Po

  325. no, it sucks too by gqgreg · · Score: 1

    I would love to use NS 6 on Mac OS X, but everytime I try to use it, it locks up, and I can't make it do anything, so I have to force quit it every time. If you know why this is happening, let me know, and I'll use NS 6 again.

    --
    Powerbook G4/1.5GHz 12", Toshiba Satellite 1135-S1554
  326. not a review! by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    You call this a "Review of the XBox." This is by no means a review of anything, other than the author's opinion about Steve Ballmer and his impact on the abilities of MS developers to develop. He says nothing about how good or bad the XBox games actually are, just that he hasn't heard anything about them and hasn't seen them (some reviewer...), but he does mention (extensively) what the PS2 has, had, and will soon have (hopefully). This is not a review of the XBox, but a shameless ad for the PlayStation. Or, more accurately, an anti-XBox opinion based in no particular facts.

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  327. not a green screen of death by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    that screen you link to is not a green screen of death at all! It's an error message, which you would probably get if you tried to load a game without the disk in. Oh my god! I'm sure we'd all rather they didn't give you an error and let you try to figure it out yourself... like most home users will of course know how to do...

    Of course, it wouldn't have this problem of not being able to load, it would just boot linux off the drive!!!

    Bear in mind, of course, that the box is designed for games, not linux. Put the damn disk in!

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  328. Get out of 3rd person view, moron! by dimer0 · · Score: 1

    GTA3 is THE BEST driving SIMULATOR EVER!

  329. Wait, there might be a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear microsoft is selling it at a loss and plans to make up for it in game sales, wouldn't it be funny if people started doing linux "things" on it and denied them this victory.

    In fact, I bet some MS competitors might even pay for this.

  330. Re:Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's ironic - in one product, it causes a transfer of information to abort and in the other it is a logo. Go figure.

  331. Who will be the First? by F34RL3SS+L34D3R · · Score: 1

    So who's gonna be the first to put Linux on it? It's pretty much a stripped down PC right(or not)?
    You never know though. MS could put some funky coding and design in there. Just look at Windows?

    I put my sig on /. and it got /.'d.

  332. Hmmm by nyseal · · Score: 1

    I always wondered why people on this sound board were so hard on MS; but I think I figured it out; 1. You have no life outside of finding weaknesses in it's OS; 2. You have no thought process outside of the fact that one needs a Masters degree to figure out something different that ALL people can work with; 3. There are WAY too many acronyms in the PC world (I think you develope them DAILY); 4. And finally, you spend WAY too much time on the internet discussing these things. IMO, people stick with what works and with what they know; so who is anyone else to criticize? Thank God this is America; who else would you have to bitch to?

    --
    [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
  333. Oh, bitch, bitch, bitch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Tell it to someone who cares..

    Why does it matter if this unit was sold to a customer? Does that make a crash any more or less acceptable?

    Keith Russell is banning Michael from his homepage? Uh-oh, well Michael better get his act straight if he knows what's good for him. God knows the world revolves around Keith Russel's slashboxes. I'm sorry, but if you are offended by humorous commentary and technical analysis, why are you reading slashdot?

    If you want flighty, kiss-ass reviews of Microsoft and their products, why don't you slither on over to MSN?

  334. Anyone know how loud this thing is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tried two dreamcasts -- I returned the first one because I thought it was defective -- both units had whines that rivaled that of the Delta in my PC! (at least according to my guests, who always say "whoa, is it supposed to sound like that?") No one I know bothered to buy a PS2, but how noisy is it, and how noisy is MS's new baby in green? If it's as bad as my DC, it's definitely not going in my living room.

  335. firesquad.com? by matty · · Score: 1

    I was intrigued at the thought of seeing internal pictures of the xbox, but when I went to www.firesquad.com, it says the domain is "parked".

    Where/how do I find these pix?

    (I did a few google searches to no avail, I'll keep trying...)

    1. Re:firesquad.com? by Technosteve! · · Score: 1

      sorry you probable won't see this but the correct site is http://firesquad.gamers.com

      --
      Me and lunchbox here are going to kick your ass.
  336. The sooner these run linux, the sooner we win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to remind everyone that M$ is losing up
    to $100 per console, and will keep dropping the price until they are losing more.
    They will make off the games.
    So if these become useful Linux boxes (which hopefully is feasable given the x86 design base) - as long as you don't buy games you will be giving Bill a good kick in the ass everytime you buy one. Wonderful, eh?

    These could be more useful in the end than the NIC (http://www.thinknic.com) as a cheap cheap Linux box.

    Rock!

  337. Most of us have Xboxs already!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's that little metallic box that sits inside your computer case... it's usually full of porn!

  338. X-Box vs Game Cube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to the "CubeClub" in Cambridge, MA and played many of the games for a few hours or so. After finging a *working* X-Box demo at Best Buy I played some football game. As I am not a big fan of football games I was not that psyced, but compared to the new Maden on the GameCube I was quite unimpressed. For such a *hot* *killer* *fast* PC moonlighting as a Console I was not that impressed. Maybe its just the game, but I will take SuperMonkey Ball over any of the X-Box titles.

  339. Not Impressed at all... by joeler · · Score: 1

    Well, it came. I compared and not impressed at all. I didn't see much difference between the quality of the three units side by side, MS, Nintendo and Sony all looked good. However, when I looked at the new available titles for the PS2, I could not resist spending money on more games for the PS2 rather than investing in a additional system. As they used to print in all the computer magazines - when choosing an operatings system - it all boils down to the apllications and that is where Sony really shines.

    Microsoft does have the monopoly power to force stores to keep empty shelf space for all the vaporware, and that lack of space does hurt the smaller developers for Sony or Nitendo. People usually buy what they can easily see, not what is hidden in some drawer.Many smaller companies with less than great games will be forced to write for Microsoft just to get a place on the shelf, as the competition for shelf space under the Sony PS2 and Nitendo name will be tough and only the best games will survive. Under the Microsoft umbrella anything will make the shelf, regardless of quality - yeah, that is when the blue screen of death will become a regular site. Not really the Microsoft hardware's fault, the imfamous "good enough for Microsoft hardware" curse will set in.

    BTW:Picked up Metal Gear Solid 2 and it is pretty good.... just wished we would have gotten there sooner, before they ran out of free MGS2 t-shirts, guess you gotta line up before the store opens, much like they did to get the PS2.

    --
    >>>please remove "nospam" from email address
  340. what will it do???? by 1st+banana+man · · Score: 1

    will it make a file server /home? for my home network or a game server for my son's tfc server a dvd player for the living room how do you load linux onto it and whats taking the guru's so long and thankyou bill for selling it so cheap..........

  341. NBC, BillG, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anyone else notice all the Microsoft references on NBC lately? Here are two I can recall...
    • Frasier's "super size" episode started out with Bill Gates visiting Frasier's studio. (Anyone else that NOONE clapped when he was introduced?)
    • Will and Grace - Jack's kid comes into Karen's "rumpus room" and goes "ooh, you got an X-box".
    Who else is sure that both of these spots were paid well? I lost respect for both shows to sell out like that.
  342. Ready for a rack in my living room by protected · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'm pretty sick of all of these dumb box geometries. Why not just standardize on the 19" rack, maybe 4 feet high and woodgrained. Then make the boxes conform to 19" rack standards. Couldn't we just do that?

    No, or course not. I have to find floor space for a stupid fake-heat-sink-finned cube or cabinet space for a sideways sitting parallelepiped. I just want to have components again. Is that too much to ask?

  343. Zelda:OoT crashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Zelda:OOT had several bugs. In fact, Nintendo patched it twice. They never told anyone this, they just put the fixed version on the newer carts. They also won't replace yours if you got a buggy version.

    They did the same thing with Perfect Dark, which would crash if you play a multiplayer game with 3 players. They just quietly put out a fixed version and wouldn't replace any of the buggy ones of those either.

  344. What Developers Wanted by Sno\/\/birD · · Score: 1

    Remember...

    Game Designers/Developers asked Microsoft for a Hard Disk, and Ethernet. Maybe we should all think ahead a bit, and we should be creative to think about the possiblities this brings to the table for consoles...COME ON!!! If you can't think of anything that these features would be useful for then keep playing your old consoles (which of course is still fun).

    Cool features of the Xbox so far...

    1) Multiplayer to the max - Did you know that right now you can have 16 people play Halo simultaneously (4 Xboxs via an ethernet HUB x 4 people each). Hmmm (something we can't do now with a console).

    2) You can rip your Cd's with it, store it on the Xbox, and substitute your soundtrack for the game's soundtrack. That's cool (something we can't do now).

    3) Other things that may be useful in the future...a system clock...Think of a game that changes the time of day in accordance with your ACTUAL time of day! I think that'd be cool.

    Come on folks...PS2 is sweet, GameCube is sweet, my Intelivision is the bomb...and I think we need to give some credit the the xbox.

    --
    Jeff -- skibum, among other things
  345. Odd by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    Isn't strange how fucking stupid the slashdot crowd is sometimes, especially something involving Microsoft. One genius posed the question "Do you think Gates and Balmer can envision great games?" Do you REALLY FUCKING THINK BILL GATES DESIGNS GAMES FOR THE XBOX? Other quite intelligent people are telling everyone they ought to buy XBoxes because Microsoft HAS to be losing money on each one you buy. The factories spitting out the XBox make just about every component in the console with most components being contained on a single board. It is very cheap to manufacture SBCs. The 300$ price tag doesn't leave much room for profit but they aren't losing anym oney on the damn boxes. Stop using pricewatch.com to find the prices of computer hardware and then trying to extrapolate the price of a console system. Others claim the XBox is little more than commodity PC hardware in a little black box. The memory subsystem isn't exactly an i815 chipset or something. Buy one if you want or don't buy one if you don't want to play the games. I'm waiting for Sunday to pick up a Gamecube. I can get a console and a couple games for the price of a PS2 or XBox console. Plus I get something for my GBA to talk to.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  346. No, I don't agree. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Please do the maths.

    MS produces 100 Xbox, each priced one dollar, real cost was 2 dollars, Linux zealots buy them (lets say they buy them all), so OK MS sells no software, but at least recovers some money from the boxes sold. They invested 200, got back 100, net loss: 100.

    Second scenario: the only Xbox is bought by Gates. They don't recoup any money at all. They invested 200, they got 1 back, net loss 199.

    One does not need to be too clever to know which scenario hurts MS the most, do the same with any numbers you wish and assume for demonstration purposes that the same numbers of units either go unsold or are bought by Linux zealots. Every time the pinch hurts the most when the boxes are unsold.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  347. Please do the maths. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    MS haters should not buy the thing. Period.

    Honest people, did you ever study basic arithmetic?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  348. Don't be ridiculous. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    There is not a god given right for every Xbox to be bought.

    That other person that is going to buy it, would have bought it any way. It is you we are talinkg about, no the hypotethical other buyer....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Don't be ridiculous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a limited supply of XBox -- not enough are available for everyone who wants it in time for Christmas. An XBox bought by a Linux nerd comes out of some kid's stocking.

      Please, think of the children.

  349. Let's run Linux on it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear:

    1) it has a hard drive
    2) it has a network card
    3) M$ is loosing money for each box sold

    This seems to be the perfect reason to buy the box and make in into something useful, e.g. install Linux and run a web server.

    Can it be done?

    This would take some of the money back M$ has stolen from me and others, when we had to pay licenses to M$ to buy PCs and laptops pre-installed with Winblows.

    Anyone knows how much they loose for each box sold?

    1. Re:Let's run Linux on it! by CN-1 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft admitted to losing $125 on each unit sold, but other companies are saying that they are flaming lyers, which is most likely the case. Most believe they are losing much more than that. There's no doubt someone is going to exploit the hardware of the xbox.

  350. A letter I wrote to IGN about this by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1
    Bullpatties! In the article that said "Xbox May Force Early PS3 Shipment," it sounds like Sony is actually admitting that the PS2 is inferior. It doesn't make sense for a corporation to admit that their product is not as good as the competition. Isn't this going to spoil sales of the PS2? If anyone's wondering what console to buy this x-mas, why would they buy a PS2 now?

    In any case, 3 years is mighty small in terms of games development. Remember the tricks they pulled on the last generation of SNES, Genesis, PlayStation, and N64 games? With the PS2, developers will just come to terms with what they can do on the system until it comes time to move onto the PS3.

    All that taken into consideration, why should gamers be expected to buy a new system every 3 years? This means that the improvement a new console will bring will only be slightly incremental. I have a PC to upgrade too, by the way. I'm pretty pissed off, because I bought a Dreamcast, PS2, and plan on buying the Gamecube, just so I could avoid the dilemma of being limited to exclusive games. (I'm still not buying an X-Box).

    The PS2's hardware can't be that bad... can it? They stuck it out with the PSX and came out on top of Nintendo, even graphically. If the Saturn would have stuck around, even its inferior technology would have been able to produce amazing things (did you catch the video of Shenmue for Saturn?)

    Disappointment.

    --

    .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

  351. innovative games? by lifftchi · · Score: 1

    all right, i know there are a lot of great games out there. but truthfully, the only games i care to play these days are konami's bemani series.

    dance dance revolution 5th mix ownz. i play it until my vision blurs and i fall over, and then i rest for a few minutes and play some more. it's addictive. so's beatmania. so's guitar freaks. all of these are creative, challenging, exciting. . . and only for playstation series (except for very minor inroads on the dreamcast.) allowing for age, i can't think of a single bad game out of the 20+ that have come out of the bemani series.

    if ddr comes out, with pads, for the xbox, i'll acknowldege it has at least one innovative game. if beatmania 2dx comes out for it, i might even have to buy one. ^_~

    and at least, when playing ddr on a dance pad, i wouldn't have to use that idiot bloated controller.

    (and, by the way, most of these games are for the original playstation. graphical power means nothing in the face of great gameplay.)

  352. Grand Theft Auto vs. Gran Turismo by layingMantis · · Score: 1

    well i hope this isn't too redundant, but i've got both games, and GTA (grand theft auto 3) is the REAL killer app. out for the PS2.
    Gran Turismo looks tight, but, as someone else has said: it leavs me cold. It's boring since the computer offers no AI competition whatsoever; the other cars don't even react to you in the slightest.
    Grand Theft Auto 3, though: wow. murder, drugs, and prostitution combine with (much more importantly), a vast, lifelike city environment (you just gotta experience it), interesting, numerous, and varied missions, and lastly, sweet music (even this is presented creatively: your car radio).

  353. Re:oi vey! your stupidity is painful by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

    you even quoted the part where i explain what i meant.

    Was that the part where you said

    there are currently no games which i could see benefitting from this on any console, nor any in the future.

    Your subtlety amazes me. I guess by saying "nor any in the future," you meant "lots of games in the future." It's clear that I'm dealing with a superior thinker here, so I'll try my best to stay on your good side.

  354. browser interface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    all these entertainment devices with their complex controls, some of which have a video output for interactive menus are getting a pain to control. Why can't they provide a web server interface to a device with a browser

    so, you mean that instead of using the directional arrows on your remote to move a cursor on the screen, and using the select button on the remote to make choices, you want to use the directional arrows on your XBox controller to move a cursor on your screen, and use the fire button to make choices. oh, and you want the choices to be presented in a box with a frame that says "Internet Explorer" on top.

    i fail to see how this makes navigating those menus any easier.

    intuitive user interfaces come from intelligent design, not from recreating the same interface in another medium. putting something inside a web browser does not automatically make it easy to use.

    1. Re:browser interface? by renehollan · · Score: 2
      so, you mean that instead of using the directional arrows on your remote to move a cursor on the screen, and using the select button on the remote to make choices, you want to use the directional arrows on your XBox controller to move a cursor on your screen, and use the fire button to make choices. oh, and you want the choices to be presented in a box with a frame that says "Internet Explorer" on top.

      Geez, no!

      First of all, I wouldn't want to use an XBox controller -- I'd use a standard remote or airmouse to navigate throught a browser-like interface on the TV or monitor screen.

      Second, the problem is that I have a number of devices (well, just three, right now, but it will grow) that all want to provide a menu system on the TV screen: i.e. the TV itself, the Satellite receiver, and the VCR. The TV will pop up it's menu over whatever program is displayed, and the other equipment displays it on a chained RF output and individual component and svideo outputs going to different inputs on the TV.

      The implication of all this mess is that I can't control one device while watching another (i.e. program the VCR while watching a movie); the TV menu and other menus can pop up tother (what a mess), and I have no control over how the satellite receiver program guide is displayed).

      It strikes me that it would be far more convenient if I had a multi-window browser displayed on the TV where I could select and control sources. Naturally, the current streamed video would usually take up the background and there would not be a foreground browser displayed.

      IOW, if I wanted to receive a satellite program, I'd click on the satellite hyperlink and get a window of satellite video and a control panel for the satellite. Same for VCR. Same for sreamed video from some web site... Browsing slashdot would be trivial. Now, there might be a limit to the number of video feeds I could select simultaneously (because of overlay window hardware limits), but a background and a movable foreground window should be adequate.

      When hubbing in new equipment, it could "register" with the "master" display contoller, and could update it's top level menu accordingly. Other hyperlinks could be added manually via keyboard and a bit of cgi. If you're gonna have a keyboard, you could use it for email, and interactive forms, but I see the use of a keyboard more for configuration than anything else.

      Basically, think of the TV/receiver as a computer with browser, and all other equipment as web servers.

      The Web-based UI works for so many disparate sites, that I can't see it failing here. The only enhancement I could conceive is a "universal" remote which causes certain "hot" buttons to match similarly tagged hyperlinks on the page displayed, so FWD, REV, VOL+, VOL-, CH+, CH-, etc. do what you'd expect. Anything "fancy" would require manually mousing and clicking on the appropriate link.

      --
      You could've hired me.
  355. FUCK XBOX IN THE GOAT ASS by CN-1 · · Score: 1

    i'm sorry to all you console geeks out there, but i can't respect any machine made by our friend borgey. hell, i read the processor was a pentium. what the hell is bill smoking these days? i played one at wal-mart and i got all pissed off becuase the controller is asstastic. 8=D---microsoft fans. anyway, i fucking hate peacocks. oh yeah, http://www.8th-wonder.net. -has a nice program. "phasma 2.0 enterprise" check it out.

  356. Xbox rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xbox roles, project gotham racing is way better than gt3, gt3 is gay, in project gotham when you run into a wall it actually gets damaged.

    gaystation is now old hat and useless.

    Slashdotters love linux and hate MS, yet voted for Gw bu$h. whats going on?

    idiots.

  357. Nonsense by sharkness · · Score: 1

    I was able to get Netscape in that period for $17 on CD in that period. I think the annual subscription was another $17 or so. NS problems were not brought on by bandwidth or MS, but management that was more interested in deals and stock options than driving the boat.

  358. Architecture is *the* point by benad · · Score: 1

    Most memory read/writes in games are random except those for textures and 3d models. And for textures, it's better to have a separate bus with its own caching (as it is the case with GC). Let me put it another way. Unified memory for game consoles is *BAD*, because the memory has to support two completly different kinds of accesses: streamed, high-bandwidth (textures, models), and random, low-latency (the rest).

    While I don't have the numbers near me, the RAM used for "main" memory (not texture memory) has lower latency in the GC, while the texture memory on the GC has a higher bandwidth (yet higher latency) because it is embedded on the 3d chip, and I/O can be done (from disk to texture cache) without the need to go through the "main" bus, the "main" memory or worse, the CPU. I'd drool to have that on my PC (or the X-Box).

    Overall, memory speed is equivalent on both GC and X-Box, but there is less need for code optimizations on the GC, because the caching systems takes care of all that for you. So, for the GC, slightly lower performance, WAY lower cost, and easier to code for.

    So, this is why I'm slightly "against" the X-Box: it's architecture is a step *backwards* in hardware design.

    Hint:
    http://assembler.roarvgm.com/Apple_Bandai_pippin /a pple_bandai_pippin.html

    It kicked PlayStation's a** (performance-wise), but guess what? Felt too much like a computer (worse, a Mac).

    - Benad

  359. Oops. Bad link. by benad · · Score: 1

    http://assembler.roarvgm.com/Apple_Bandai_pippin/a pple_bandai_pippin.html

    - Benad

  360. Again? by benad · · Score: 1

    Just remove the space in the link. Damn word wrap.

    - Benad

  361. Points by dieselboy · · Score: 1

    I would lik to share my a few of my opinions about the X-Box....

    1. memory bandwidth

    The whole buzz is around the graphics controller, which is probably similar to GeForce 3 running @ 250MHz, with a system architeture similar to the nForce chipset.

    The nForce sounds great, consider that the GPU is basically a GeForce 2 MX, but can TwinBank w/ DDR RAM keep up with a GeForce 3? TwinBank is nothing more than a fancy version of a UMA architeture. The GPU on the X-Box doesn't have dedicated V-RAM, it shares the same DDR memory with the CPU. That sounds like a serious bandwidth issue.

    It sounds like the SNES all over agin: a great GPU being limited by the system architeture.

    for the record, PS2 uses RDAM and GameCube uese 1T-SRAM.

    2. Hard drive

    Is a hard drive really desirable on a console? It adds complexity to the system: File management, software installation, physical failures, etc. A console should do nothing bu play games and should do so simply and reliably.

    3. CPU

    Is a 733 MHz P-III enough? Consider x86's lackluster FPU performance, can it really compete with the MIPS core of PS2 or the PowerPC core of GameCube?

    4. The platform

    Of course one might argue that having a HD creates new possibility beyond games, and that's what MS is betting on. Whether the X-Box is successful or not, it really is just a launch platform for future MS digital home entertainment strategy. The digital hub is what MS trying to conquer.

    5. Future price cuts:

    Consider the fact that it uses standard PC parts, and how fast the prices of these parts fall, I'd imagine MS would be able to cut the system price rather aggressively in the near future, something Sony can't really do with the PS2.

    Personally I find GameCube a better system: Respectable specs, and it does nothing beside playing games. It amazes me to see how clean the GameCube's sytem board design looks. While it's uncertain how powerful it's GPU really is, if u consider all the problem developers have with the PS2's vector units and the possible system bottlenecks of the X-Box, the GameCube should remain rather competitive.

    Realisiticly though, the PS2 would probably continue to take the lead in sales and public mindshare.

  362. Yu Suzuki : Ferrari F355 Challenge & GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Po knows where it's at! Sega F355 Challenge for
    the Dreamcast is still the best driving experience
    you can have at home on any console. the physics
    in F355 give it remarkable depth and replay. so
    good in fact that last year the programmers from
    all different companies at the Game Developers
    Conference voted it "best physics engine" for all
    games in any genre on any platform..

    a true classic from the real innovators -- Sega!
    in my mind Grand Prix Legends for PC is the only
    other driving game of the same quality. Grand
    Prix 3 by Geoff Crammond is also nice but imho
    just doesn't have that killer responsiveness which
    makes playing the aforementioned so enjoyable..

    [74x'y"]

  363. Network capability by Jaketu · · Score: 1

    I have heard that the XBOX has network capability. I am wondering what is the extent of that capability. Is it just being able to play with multiple users online?

  364. Got my X-Box and it is GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got the X-box and it is a rather fine product ( for the moment). No green or Blue screens yet and I don't think that will happen too fast. I am not happy giving more money to the Borg but this product does give you the best of both the game console and PC worlds in one mid sized package.

    BTW - not and Anonymous Coward - just cannot remember my user ID or Password as I am on another parties hardware.