Slashdot Mirror


Hotmail Blocks Gmail Emails (and Invites)

bonhomme_de_neige writes "Emails and invitations sent to Hotmail from Gmail accounts do not bounce, but nor do they arrive in the recipient's Inbox - they vanish mysteriously into the aether. Joel Johnson writes in his Gizmodo weblog that invitations he sent to a Hotmail address bounced (this even received coverage from ZDNet). Search Engine Roundtable writes that several ISPs are blocking Gmail. It's already well-documented that Yahoo moves Gmail invites into the Bulk Mail folder. I've personally confirmed the Hotmail and Yahoo blocking." Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another.

894 comments

  1. Stunning by Marxist+Commentary · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mega-corporations don't play nice? Really? I'm absolutely flabbergasted!

    1. Re:Stunning by Bricklets · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Mega-corporations don't play nice? Really? I'm absolutely flabbergasted!

      An email service blocking emails from a competing email service is surprising. Has this ever happened before? Is this even legal?

      --
      Little Bricklets
    2. Re:Stunning by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know if it's legal, but it's certainly unethical.

      I don't understand why ISPs would block gmail mail anyway. (I understand the invites, though.)

    3. Re:Stunning by gazbo · · Score: 3, Informative
      Rubbish. I use Hotmail, a friend of mine uses gmail. I've not had any problems getting his mails, and I've not even had to whitelist him for the spam filter.

      This story is the biggest pile of turd I've read on Slashdot - and I've read some pretty strong contenders.

    4. Re:Stunning by Bricklets · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't understand why ISPs would block gmail mail anyway. (I understand the invites, though.)

      Well, the articles mentions that some email providers are blocking GMail due to privacy concerns. Seems like a bunch of hogwash to me.

      --
      Little Bricklets
    5. Re:Stunning by Otter · · Score: 1
      Mega-corporations don't play nice? Really? I'm absolutely flabbergasted!

      Hang on to your hat! In fact, it seems that Slashdot, part of the online arm of a (former) major Linux vendor, has simply rushed another completely false anti-Microsoft article into publication! Strange times we live in.

    6. Re:Stunning by sentientbeing · · Score: 2, Informative

      the guy didnt say it was blocking emails in general but gmail invitations specifically

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    7. Re:Stunning by gazbo · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Well, let us see, shall we?

      Title: Hotmail Blocks Gmail Emails (and Invites)

      First sentence: Emails and invitations sent to Hotmail from Gmail...[don't] arrive in the recipient's Inbox

      Yup, clearly only talks about invitations, Einstein.

    8. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Hahaha. You say if he read the post but you obviously didn't. It says several times emails and invites. Heck the heading itself says emails and then invites in parantheses.

    9. Re:Stunning by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Rubbish. A friend of mine reads the news nearly every day, and still manages to make stupid comments based on misunderstanding those new reports. Reading the post probably wouldn't have helped.

    10. Re:Stunning by Xformer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Overgeneralization has made it into /. stories before, or have you not been around that long? If you simply RTFA, you'll see that it's mainly just the invites that have gone missing.

      --
      All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
    11. Re:Stunning by 13Echo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I sent an invite to someone two days ago, and he still hasn't gotten it.

      I can vouch that this is certainly questionable.

    12. Re:Stunning by TheGreek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, if you had read the fscking post, you'd realize that there is no mention of normal mail between hotmail and gmail: it's referring specifically to gmail invites.

      Okay. Let's read the first sentence of the article body:

      Emails and invitations sent to Hotmail from Gmail accounts do not bounce, but nor do they arrive in the recipient's Inbox - they vanish mysteriously into the aether.

      Wait. So the article asserts that not only are invitations being eaten, but also regular e-mails?

      Perhaps if you looked at a mirror, you'd realize that you're a worthless sack of shit who failed third-grade reading comprehension.

    13. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know b/c I didn't RTFA, but I received an invite to gmail in my hotmail account back on june 9th.

    14. Re:Stunning by bonhomme_de_neige · · Score: 5, Informative
      I use Hotmail, a friend of mine uses gmail. I've not had any problems getting his mails

      Actually - it happened in this order. Test email sent to Hotmail, did not arrive. Story submitted to Slashdot. Email arrived in Hotmail account several hours later (after other emails I sent from my other accounts _after_ the one from gmail - which arrived almost instantly). I've read several reports of Hotmail both bouncing and vanishing Gmail email - I'm sure if you hunt around you can find even more. It may be that they are changing their behaviour as they realise it'd going to do them more harm then good.

      As for the Yahoo one, that is definitely true.

      --
      "Why are you watching the washing machine?"
      "I love entertainment, as long as it's clean"
    15. Re:Stunning by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      Apparently it isn't the blocking of regular email but rather the invitation that the author is pointing to. Not having experienced the GMail invite myself (not that I'm expecting one) I do have a minor privacy concern that MS would be filtering information that a person may actually wish to receive. On the other hand though, I do appreciate the SPAM filters (doesn't stop all junk mail from my Hotmail account, but it has become more reasonable).

      I guess the main problem is that if MS is truly blocking GMail invites, this just provides more evidence for Microsofts monopolistic tactics, particularly to those already looking at MS as a monopoly. My opinion (and this is if MS really is blocking) on this is that if MS is willing to allow other non-solicited email in, they shouldn't block at their discretion unless they've added particular content blocking to their policies (which I haven't read since I joined a long time ago).

    16. Re:Stunning by danielsfca2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > I don't understand why ISPs would block...

      Hotmail and Yahoo! are not ISPs. They're a couple of second-rate e-mail services. This is yet another reason everyone should steer clear of "free" e-mail altogether.

      Everyone has a real e-mail account available to them if they just pay enough attention to know who's offering it (real ISP, college, job) and learn how to set up a real e-mail client. Five minutes.

    17. Re:Stunning by cloudmaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How does gmail's indexing of email stored on gmail servers affect mail coming in to an ISP? "Privacy" my arse. I trust google to tread my data properly more than I do most ISPs anyway. :)

    18. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because people should never need to switch ISP's, colleges, or jobs. I know when I pick a college, I'm there for the rest of my life.

    19. Re:Stunning by gazbo · · Score: 1
      Oh, no complaints there. It was the Slashdot story that I originally took issue with (though the spin on the linked stories is questionable at best). The reason for my vociferous reply was that he didn't point me to the article as you did, but to the post which, clearly, does not single out invites.

      Actually, I just got a reply from the article submitter to my original comment, which is worth reading as explanation.

    20. Re:Stunning by presarioD · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't know if it's legal, but it's certainly unethical.

      Well not really! This is like the "No Solicitors" sign you see everywhere nowdays. I guess it's part of their right to block invitations, but blocking "customer service" because of ethnicity or origin that's unethical!

      --
      Yam, yam, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade
    21. Re:Stunning by MarkPNeyer · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean a company offering its services for free is putting restrictions on said services? *Gasp* Can 1984 be far behind? Surely this is the result of the eeeevil George W. Bush and his Patriot Act. Serioulsy, though. These companies are offering a free service. There's nothing unethical or illegal about making said service crappier. Even if you were paying for it, they've still got license to do whatever they want with the service (unless of course the TOS say that the TOS are never going to change...) Isn't this just like consoles all being proprietary, so that not just anyone can make games fro them?

      --

      My blog
    22. Re:Stunning by Errtu76 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      more likely is that they're blocking gmails because it might become more populair than their own services.

      If GMail is blocked by alot of providers, how many users will want to sign up?

    23. Re:Stunning by slimak · · Score: 5, Informative

      unless your ISP is SBC, then you get a Yahoo! account (even though its @sbcglobal.net).

    24. Re:Stunning by BlameFate · · Score: 1

      I received a Gmail Invite to my Hotmail account last night too, although that one was sent specifically to me by a friend. I got a Blogger account a couple of weeks back to see if a Gmail invite would follow, and it didn't.

      --

      --is not to be confused with user #672982 - Bame Flait

    25. Re:Stunning by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Overgeneralization

      Wow, president Bush reads Slashdot!

    26. Re:Stunning by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everyone has a real e-mail account available to them if they just pay enough attention to know who's offering it (real ISP, college, job) and learn how to set up a real e-mail client. Five minutes.

      Real ISPs come and go, you are not in college forever, and you dont keep the same job forever. However, you CAN keep one of these "second-rate" email addresses indefinitely. I have had my yahoo account for years, while friends and colleagues change their "real" email accounts year after year, mine has always been the same. I have lost touch with many people because they changed email addresses and never told anyone.

      Thanks for the short-sighted answer.

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    27. Re:Stunning by arkanes · · Score: 1

      I just sent an email to a friend with a hotmail account (from my brand-new gmail account) and she recieved it in seconds. Maybe it's just hotmails general suckiness and losing email in general, and people are more "aware" because it's gmail?

    28. Re:Stunning by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      The free accounts are great for signing up for forums and stuff that you don't want your real email address spread all over the net. Gmail's 1 gig of space means I won't have to clean out my inbox from all the spam for a few years!

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    29. Re:Stunning by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Same for BT Openworld also known as Openwoe...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    30. Re:Stunning by shokk · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the power of a little FUD. If California legislators have been bamboozled by it, so can some buzzword eating execs at ISPs.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    31. Re:Stunning by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      well, since he (she?!) obviously doesn't want it, you can send one my way ;)

      spambait@ForgottenNewbies.com - since i run the server, i know it isn't going to disappear into the void like hotmail and yahoo appear to be doing :)

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    32. Re:Stunning by mgrassi99 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have both a Yahoo and Hotmail account...someone email me an invite and I'll verify this post ;)

      mgrassi99@yahoo.com
      mikegrassi@hotmail.com

      -M

    33. Re:Stunning by I_Want_This_ID · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've had 5 different "Real" email accounts since 1998. I've had ONE Yahoo email account since 1998.

      I kind of like the option of NOT having to change my email account (and notify everyone of the change) just because I change my frickin' ISP.

      When I can afford to have hosting set up for myself on my own domain, then I'll move my "Fake" email to my own personally hosted email.

      Is this that hard to understand?

    34. Re:Stunning by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      "ISP" means "Internet Service Provider"

      That doesn't just mean they provide dial-up or broadband service. An ISP can be a company that provides email and webspace, possibly exclusively. Rackspace would be an example of such an ISP.

    35. Re:Stunning by zhenlin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I just recieved a GMail invitation this afternoon... But I also have GMail on my whitelist. So I can't confirm or deny it.

    36. Re:Stunning by baylanger · · Score: 1
      This might be a good reason for "bad" IPSs to block gmail accounts.

      I've never heard of any IPS giving 1GB away per email accounts and you can actually leave the emails on their server. AND, where are the other features proposed by gmail, like the super-quick search option?

      Many of us are consider a gmail account with 1GB! Once you start using your gmail accounts and that your friends are aware of your new email address, next time the network of your IPS goes down -- you can leave right away without having to worry that you might loose some emails, etc.

      How many people stays with their ISP because they don't want to loose their email address, even if their IPS's network sucks?

      And, when will my email address be portable from an IPS to another one? I doubt this will ever come, and until then... This is why I *never* used the free email address from my IPS, thanx to PObox.com -- they forward my email anywhere I wish and as of a few days ago, even to my gmail account!!!

    37. Re:Stunning by It'sYerMam · · Score: 3, Informative
      The motto: huzzah for email forwarding.

      You get all the advantages of a real email address without the changiness.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    38. Re:Stunning by Seven001 · · Score: 1

      I only use my Yahoo and Hotmail accounts to sign up for things I either know I'm going to get spam from, or I think there is a risk of it. That is what I think most use their free accounts for. Considering that my bulk mail folder at Yahoo has at least 50 spam emails in it a day, I am glad I have a throw-away account with them.

    39. Re:Stunning by stun · · Score: 1
      I totally agree with you gazbo
      Rubbish. I use Hotmail, a friend of mine uses gmail. I've not had any problems getting his mails, and I've not even had to whitelist him for the spam filter. This story is the biggest pile of turd I've read on Slashdot - and I've read some pretty strong contenders.
      I've sent GMail invitation to my friends using Hotmail myself, AND they received it successfully within seconds and accepted it within the last three days.
    40. Re:Stunning by KingPrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yahoo is not a second-rate email service. It is the fastest and most reliable service I've found, and I've been on a dozen different ISPs and two different colleges. All of their email servers were come-and-go. Pop3 was hit or miss and the webmail was slow as molasses. Yahoo's webmail is snappy and has a clean interface. And their pop3 access (which I pay for) is reliable and fast.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    41. Re:Stunning by mdwh2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Everyone has a real e-mail account available to them if they just pay enough attention to know who's offering it (real ISP, college, job) and learn how to set up a real e-mail client. Five minutes.

      But paid-for doesn't always mean better. I'm on NTL, and in the last year the email service has become unuseable (emails sometimes take months to arrive, or sometimes disappear altogether; sometimes connecting to POP or SMTP is very difficult). Paid-for doesn't mean you have more of a position to complain, when your complaints are completely ignored. Whilst gmail blocking seems to be restricted to free email accounts, it is not inconceivable that paid for ISPs may try dirty tactics.

      Switching to a free email account (that I still use a "real email client" for) took five minutes, but switching entirely to a new cable ISP would take far longer.

    42. Re:Stunning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Privacy concerns? That's such hogwash. GMail's server reads your email and offers syntactical ads. If it didn't offer the ads, GMail's server would still read your email. So would ever server between the sender AND GMail. Machines read your email all the time. If they didn't, you wouldn't be able to get it. You certainly wouldn't be able to have it checked for spam. Thinking your message is "private" just because the machines don't explicitly tell you they read it is very naive.

      Methinks ISPs are using "Privacy Concerns" as a way of keeping customers from leaving their quickly aging service. "Hey look, bearded technology pundits with nothing better to do are upset about ads in a radical new free email service. They're waving the privacy flag. We can wave the same flag and lock people in to viewing our contextually inaccurate ads a little bit longer!"

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    43. Re:Stunning by RichM · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hotmail and Yahoo! are not ISPs. They're a couple of second-rate e-mail services.
      MSN and Yahoo are ISPs.
    44. Re:Stunning by darkmeridian · · Score: 0, Troll

      The end HTML tag for your signature is wrong. It should be "voice=mr.burns" instead of "voice=normal". This is slashdot! HTML must be W3C compliant here! (Oh, wait.)

      Hey! I've created a successor to the spelling/grammar Nazi trolls: the HTML tag troll! Do I get a medal for this?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    45. Re:Stunning by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      RTFA? Have you not been around that long?

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    46. Re:Stunning by lvdrproject · · Score: 1

      Yeah, same. Unless this JUST started happening, the claim is tenuous at best. I received an invite just 2 or 3 days ago, and it worked fine. :/

    47. Re:Stunning by Xformer · · Score: 1

      He writes for it, too, apparently :-)

      Shouldn't the lameness filter kick him back out, though?

      --
      All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
    48. Re:Stunning by Xformer · · Score: 1

      To realize that no one does it? Yeah, I have, hence the comment.

      --
      All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
    49. Re:Stunning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, the real solution is to take $50 or so and invest in your own domain name and domain based email hosting with a reputable company. By controlling the DOMAIN your email goes to, you have complete control over your email address. If your company goes under, you can move to another one in about 2 days. If your domain provider goes under, you can move your Domain to a new one in about a week. And best of all, you can offer free email accounts to all of your friends and family...free email accounts that you can vouch for, that don't pop up ads everywhere, and that you can control who reads/knows about their existance.

      I started my hosting company as a cooperative just so I could get rid of my favorite email "alias," dasmegabyte@mindless.com, which the company providing the alias had sold to spammers when I told them no, I won't give you $10 a month to forward my fucking email with ads at the bottom. Incidentally, I lost a job in 2001 because the hiring staff sent an email to dasmegabyte@mindless.com and I had already dropped that account -- there was too much spam to sort through.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    50. Re:Stunning by zCyl · · Score: 1

      As far back as a couple years ago, I've seen emails sent from Yahoo to Hotmail just vaporize into thin air, intermittently of course. This is just one of the "features" of Hotmail, and is probably just a poor and misfiring attempt at blocking spam. The behavior has caused a number of my friends to leave Hotmail for other free services.

    51. Re:Stunning by avgjoe62 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Machines read your email all the time. If they didn't, you wouldn't be able to get it. You certainly wouldn't be able to have it checked for spam. Thinking your message is "private" just because the machines don't explicitly tell you they read it is very naive.

      So very true. I remember back in the days when we were using MS Mail, I could watch the messages scroll on by the MS Mail Internet Connector, from the initial "Hello" to the text of the message. There never has been any privacy in email. Just read the terms of use of your corporate or college account.

      But is anyone reading /. really surprised to see the internet and inter-operability fracturing because corporate interests are squabbling? Or are we so quick to forget this recent example? I'm just wondering how long until this becomes a "feature" in Exchange Server...

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    52. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have lost touch with many people because they changed email addresses and never told anyone.
      Oh, I doubt that they never told anyone. Likely they decided not to tell just you. Do you really believe that you lost touch with them by accident???

    53. Re:Stunning by phurley · · Score: 1

      mailinator.com

      know it, use it, love it...

      --
      Home Automation & Linux -- now I know I'm a geek
    54. Re:Stunning by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well not really! This is like the "No Solicitors" sign you see everywhere nowdays. I guess it's part of their right to block invitations, but blocking "customer service" because of ethnicity or origin that's unethical!

      Yes, but your city council does not put the "No Solicitors" sign on your door for you, and give you no option to remove it if you happen to enjoy solicitors.

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    55. Re:Stunning by kirun · · Score: 1

      It's not that expensive at all. In fact, you can have a domain with POP3 email for around 10 pounds a year, from somebody like 1&1. You don't need web hosting to run a domain.

      --
      I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
    56. Re:Stunning by Shaklee39 · · Score: 1

      This article is a lie. I received a gmail invite yesterday on my hotmail account and it came straight to my inbox.

    57. Re:Stunning by Xhad · · Score: 1
      Aside from the fact that ISPs/jobs/schools can change, not everyone accesses the Internet from home.

      Public libraries are useful to me since ideally I don't spend more than an hour or two a day online anyway.

    58. Re:Stunning by Roofus · · Score: 1

      Exactly. But instead of using an Ad-infested megacorp email service, I use Fastmail. I use my own domains, and they all go to my Fastmail email account. If for some reason Fastmail were to go away, I would just find another provider to host my mx records.

      Definitely worth $50 per year.

    59. Re:Stunning by celorfin · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm arguing, but I have an invite sitting in my hotmail inbox, which I received 3 hours ago.

    60. Re:Stunning by wk633 · · Score: 1

      There are some very good reasons to use free web mail.

      1) Don't use your work account for personal use.
      2) Use web mail to prevent viruses (if you're smart enough to not download attachments)
      3) Easy access from anywhere, great for trips.
      4) Throwaway for use that may collect spam.

    61. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, this is article is total crap. I recieved a gmail invitation to my Hotmail account last Saturday.

    62. Re:Stunning by rworne · · Score: 1

      I dunno about the soliciting, since I needed to give them my email address for them to send the invite in the first place. So the invite itself isn't unsolicited, it's a response to an inquiry. Or am I totally wrong now and Gmail is spamming (cold calling) for new accounts?

      I registered my interest on/about April 1st, I still have not gotten an invite. That'll teach me to use Hotmail.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    63. Re:Stunning by ip_fired · · Score: 1

      I sent you the two invites. Check your mail and see if you got them. (And give one of those to a friend, you only really need one gmail account) :)

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    64. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after i set up my gmail account, i sent a test email to my own email address (at diversionmary.com) and cc'd my gf @ yahoo.com she got hers, and i didnt get mine for a long time. i think it ended up taking an hour to get to my own domain.
      -e

    65. Re:Stunning by metamatic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or pay $12 a year for pobox.com redirection and spam filtering. No ads, and you can send the mail to whatever real e-mail account you like, and change it at a moment's notice (unlike personal domains).

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    66. Re:Stunning by Rinisari · · Score: 1

      I kept my GMX account spam-free for almost 5 years. GMX also has POP3 and SMTP access, last I checked. It's still scot-free. So, get yourself a decent free email provider with both IMAP/POP3 and SMTP access as well as webmail, and you're set. You can use any email client you want.

    67. Re:Stunning by ip_fired · · Score: 1

      But the problem is that it's not really unsolicited. An invite is from somebody that you are likely to know. That means that the mail provider is actually throwing mail away from a friend. I find this much more offensive and wrong than the e-mail scanning that Google does to provide the text ads.

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    68. Re:Stunning by mgrassi99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sweet! They both came through, the one sent to Yahoo was stuck in my Bulk folder, and the one to Hotmail was in my inbox (I use the "enhanced" junk mail filtering). This post is BUSTED. -Mike

    69. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still confused as to why anyone is surprised that email not arriving at a Hotmail account is a big deal. From my experience this is a common every day thing. Isn't there some saying about not attributing something to malice that can't be explained by stupidity?

    70. Re:Stunning by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      No.

      I move a lot. As such, I change ISP's a alot. My job does NOT provide me an email address for personal use, and I am NOT in college.

      So a free email not attached to an ISP serves two very important functions: I don't have to spend additional money that I don't have, and I don't have to change email addresses every time I change ISP's.

      Your assumptions are extreme overgeneralizations at best. Please realize that not everyone is YOU.

    71. Re:Stunning by FlashBac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OK, fair enough. Yahoo etc are not the greatest.
      BUT I set up my yahoo account 10 years ago, and yes I had a college account, then I left college, had a differant work account, back to college, diff account, Job, diff account, and am now working as a postdoc with a differant account.
      My point is I still have the same yahoo account I had when I was 17. I used it in South America, in Germany, in the Port Authority in NYC, Stansted Airport and so on. So, if someone that i met 7 years ago wants to drop me a mail, and doesnt have my work/uni address, they use yahoo. (And I tell them to use my work address from then on.) But the contact is made. And, therefore they cannot be described as "second-rate e-mail services", because when you are in the back ends of the Andes they are the only thing available, and are pretty first rate in those instances. They are a differant type of account, and are useful.
      And I take offence at hotmail or anyone censoring my mails.

      --
      "Thats right buddy, the large print giveth, and the small print taketh away."
    72. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      free email providers dont last forever.... anyone use to have a USA.NET account ? i used to, had a GREAT username too... they slowly took away free services, until there was nothing left to take away except the free account completely.... cant rely on something that's free !

    73. Re:Stunning by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I have lost touch with many people because they changed email addresses and never told anyone."

      They told people, they just didn't tell you. Sorry to be the one to tell you that... ;)

    74. Re:Stunning by tetranz · · Score: 1

      Or pay $12 a year for pobox.com redirection and spam filtering.

      Yes pobox.com is a great service which I used for about five years and still recommend to friends but at the end of the day you're still dependent on them staying in business and not unreasonably raising prices etc

      A .com domain registration including free email forwarding is only $7.95 per year now at GoDaddy. That's probably a better deal if you're about to go through the pain of changing addresses and you really want the confidence of being able to keep the address forever. If GoDaddy became a problem then you can always move the domain elsewhere.

    75. Re:Stunning by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      QUOTE " unless your ISP is SBC, then you get a Yahoo! account (even though its @sbcglobal.net)."

      I have SBC swbell as an ISP who uses sbcglobal.

      Although my email suffix is @swbell.net I also have the ability to check through yahoo.

      The thing is, they also offer pop service.

      Look around on the website or call and they'll give you the incoming and outcoming pop3 server addr.

      I'd switch ISP's if they didn't provide for me! I know that for sure.

    76. Re:Stunning by NerdSlayer · · Score: 3, Funny

      hmm... no gmail account for you, but I'm willing to bet some spam will be on its way...

    77. Re:Stunning by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "This is yet another reason everyone should steer clear of "free" e-mail altogether."

      This does not alleviate them of the responsibility of providing a useful service.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    78. Re:Stunning by ralinx · · Score: 1

      haha.. you're gonna get spammed so bad.. oh wait..

    79. Re:Stunning by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What amuses me about all of this is that ISPs and stupid technology writers keep waving that flag, but it's not like Google is trying to be underhanded about how the service works. They seem to make it pretty clear what's going to happen when you sign up.

      Essentially, anyone who blocks Gmail invites would be saying "well, I understand that you agreed to what Google offered, but I feel as though I have more say in your decisions, so I'm rescinding your approval and issuing a denial on your behalf". How is THAT not an abuse of privacy? If they really felt that their customers' privacy was at risk, why wouldn't they just offer a warning? Blocking the e-mails is essentially saying that you have more say in your customer's decisions than they do online, PLUS it indicates that you were watching their mail in the first place!

      Do you I smell a pile of boving excrement wafting on the breeze from the direction of a few dirty ISPs and freemail providers?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    80. Re:Stunning by msh104 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, about privacy. Gmail seems to be scanning all it's mail. that will include the mail from people that send mail to gmail users. but don't forget that you sometimes HAVE to send mails to people with gmail accounts. just think about what email providers will come up with next. "your mail will now have a 4% chance of being send to a random user, he or she can then pay us in order to know where the mail is from, we think this is a very geeky way to create a dating service, if you press accept, you agree, otherwise you won't be able to use our service." the bigger companies are the only ones that can stop a privacy disaster.

    81. Re:Stunning by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I don't understand why ISPs would block gmail mail anyway. (I understand the invites, though.)"

      One possibility is that something in GMail is tripping a spam filter. Maybe they send via HTML or they have a sig containing exactly the wrong words or something.

      Honestly, I have NFI as I don't have GMail or know anybody who does. I'm only throwing this out because I've done stupid things with anti-spam rules before.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    82. Re:Stunning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Not "unlike personal domains." First off, if you have your own personal domain, you won't NEED to change the email account name. Second off, if you did, every email program on the planet will forward your email if you tell it to, and with much greater granularity than pobox.com Third, you only get ONE username for that $12. If you have six people in your family, the Dolman-Sax family, you can register Dolman-Sax.com and give them all email for way less than the price of 6 pobox.com accounts.

      Finally, as I said in my previous message, I used to use an identical service from a company that got bought by iname and it quickly became garbage. They demanded I pay $10 a year for forward dasmegabyte@mindless.com to me, and they also sold it to spammers. Nothing stops pobox.com from being bought out or changing their terms, leaving you with a shitty email address. I have had my das@domainname for five years now, used it on about 6 different servers from 3 different providers and I love it. Got my parents and brother on it too. It's quick, it has POP3, IMAP, spamassassin, squirrelmail, pine...and if it ever goes down, I know who to call.

      Me, baby. Me.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    83. Re:Stunning by malfunct · · Score: 1

      They probably fit the filter definition of spam. I'm sure if you added the g-mail address to your safe list the mail would make it right through.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    84. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't tell you their new email address, it means they don't like you. Same deal if they change phone numbers.

    85. Re:Stunning by topynate · · Score: 1

      I get pop3 from yahoo (uk) as well, and I have a regular free account. Am I missing something here?

    86. Re:Stunning by SpiritOfGrandeur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The spam filter on Outlook 2003 also kills all gmail messages as a default. I had three invites in my Junk Email Folder, and four from friends writing from the gmail account...

    87. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have had my yahoo account for years, while friends and colleagues change their "real" email accounts year after year, mine has always been the same. I have lost touch with many people because they changed email addresses and never told anyone.

      Maybe they just didn't tell *you*

    88. Re:Stunning by ivan1011001 · · Score: 1

      Got any more Gmail in ya? I'm looking for an invite. its ivan1011001@yahoo.com or opgeven89@yahoo.com If you would be so kind.

      --

      I was thinking of converting to paganism, but where the hell can you find sacrificial virgins these days?
    89. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes, that's a feature, not a bug.

      There have been multiple times throughout my life where I've been glad that someone lost track of my email address.

      Of course, now I have a "permanent" one, so sometimes people I rather happily watched disappear from my radar screen 4-5 years ago suddenly pop up and want money, attention, sympathy, etc. etc.

    90. Re:Stunning by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      If you have some more... connard@palmdrive.net

      thanks!

    91. Re:Stunning by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      This is all very reminiscent of the early days of radio before the FRC (later to become the FCC). There were companies manufacturing radios with incompatible modulation schemes. These companies were in bed with broadcasters. Add to that the free-for-all that was unregulated radio spectrum and you had a mess of interference. Someone in town A wanted to have their program on 1260 kHz and someone in town B (only 20 miles away wanted 1260 kHz as well. With no one telling them what frequency to use or what modulation scheme, they completely stompped over each other. The end result: an audience that couldn't hear their broadcasts. The root cause: the desire to smother competition. The fix came along when the FRC was founded and they assigned portions of spectrum to broadcasters paying careful attention to the overlap of signals. The end result: the golden age of wireless. So here we are almost 100 years later, and businesses are being stupid, as always. Instead of beating their competition through REALLY being competitive in the e-mail business, they are playing all these silly games to try and damage each other. End result: unhappy users. I say that if you're a real geek worth your salt, fuck them and run your own goddamned mail server. That's what I did and I never looked back. Courier + ASSP + 1 TB data store (for mail AND file serving) = pure e-mail heaven. :) You won't see me using Notmail or Yoohoo ever.

    92. Re:Stunning by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      for $12 a year, buy your own .com address and be Mr@ShitFace.com or anything you like, why waste it on a lame ass pobox.com crapolo, with your on .com , you can make 10000's of email addresses at your domain or 1000's of subdomains!

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    93. Re:Stunning by selloutvixen · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with "free" e-mail; it's free, it's easy to navigate, and you can check it anywhere. This isn't necessarily the case with a "real" e-mail account. I had an ArgoSoft e-mail address through my work that is absolutely horrendous. Give me my Yahoo! anyday.

      And what is this "real" business? Free e-mail isn't "fake", it's just different. Besides, would you really want to send love notes on your boss-monitored work e-mail? That's what I thought.

    94. Re:Stunning by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and in the last month, after having had this account for over a year, I'm now getting at least half a dozen virus-ridden email bounces and fake Microsoft alerts and Nigerian spam from this SBC Yahoo account.

      Yahoo sends me email which they say is virus infected and the attachment could not be cleaned so they removed the attachment.

      EXCEPT THEY DIDN'T REMOVE THE ATTACHMENT! It's still there and my AV has to move it to the virus vault because it's still infected.

      Yahoo obviously has real quality AV software and a complete inability to identify fake Microsoft emails as spam.

      Wonderful fucking email system.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    95. Re:Stunning by stiffneck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not really. When you graduate from college, or change ISPs, or change companies, you'd be lucky if they'll let you keep your old email address, even if it just forwards all messages to your new address.

    96. Re:Stunning by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      What? This doesn't even make any sense. Google is running an algorithm over your e-mail to extract keywords, then using those keywords to feed you ads on the side. Nobody's sitting there reading your e-mail, and I'm sure they've already said that they don't store the results of their searches.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    97. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, I just received an invite in my Yahoo account on Friday and it was in my Inbox.

    98. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this even legal?

      Obligatory Star Wars quote:

      "I will make it legal."

    99. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what gives? yes, i've left college, i've changed job, i just say the DNS admin to redirect my domain to the new mailserver ip, so i receive still receive it.
      having the same e-mail acount for the last 5 years.

    100. Re:Stunning by maiden_taiwan · · Score: 1
      Real ISPs come and go, you are not in college forever, and you dont keep the same job forever. However, you CAN keep one of these "second-rate" email addresses indefinitely.

      Only if you keep liking your second-rate provider. If they start to suck, you'll have to change that "indefinite" address.

      If you want the same email address for life, get your own domain. Then it doesn't matter if your ISPs "come and go" -- just switch ISP anytime you need to.

    101. Re:Stunning by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      We all know that a experiment involving one, is not enough to proove something

      So how about me 'testing' *cough cough* if an invite would come through at fpsgamedesign@msn.com ?

    102. Re:Stunning by Yewbert · · Score: 1

      I just sent three emails from my GMail account to my (free) Hotmail account, and one of them showed up. Make of that what you will, but at least the blockage isn't 100% complete.

    103. Re:Stunning by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was referring to a global forwarding address (My email address is one) that forwards email to whatever account you specify.
      You generally have to pay, but some would deem this better than having mail deleted, encrypted, lost, burnt or whatever.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    104. Re:Stunning by joeljkp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Isn't that what .name was created for? I haven't heard much out of them... is it still going strong? I wouldn't mind first@last.name.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    105. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, many colleges now give email accounts for life to all of their graduates. I first saw this at Purdue, and I've seen it elsewhere since. There's no guarantee that a yahoo or gmail account is for life, your account is active until they go out of business or dominate the market enough that they start charging. Case in point: USA.net and mail.com.

      Thanks!

    106. Re:Stunning by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      First off, if you have your own personal domain, you won't NEED to change the email account name.

      Totally agree with all your points, but just this week I discovered the boundless limits of human ignorance.

      My daughter's boyfriend claims to know all there is to know about computers (and everything else: he's a teenager, after all). So I offered to set him up with an email account on my hosting (not the same as owning your own physical server, but close enough for my needs). I told him that he wouldn't have to worry about long, hard-to-remember AOL or Hotmail or Yahoo login names -- pick something simple.

      He comes back with "darkmagik##########", where "#" is a long, meaningless (to me) string of numbers. I tell him there's no way I'm putting crap like that on my server. I also let him know that darkmagik.com is available, and he could be anything@darkmagik.com.

      He then says that he's fine, he's got Yahoo's IM.

      I throw in the towel.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    107. Re:Stunning by TXGB324 · · Score: 1
    108. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freaking stunning is exactly right. How can gmail be so altering the fabric of our cyber community. It's the End of Times, I'm sure of it. Hoard your canned meat products and fetile women!

    109. Re:Stunning by chrwei · · Score: 1

      hotmail delays and denies messages at random, I think so as to make Windows users feel at home. If everything worked without issue windows users would feel uncomfortable.

      it's funny cause it's true

      --
      - Disclaimer: Information in this post deemed reliable but not guaranteed.
    110. Re:Stunning by megarich · · Score: 0

      ISPs block it cause their scared and jealous that gmail can offer a gig of space while these assh*les still can't get past the early 90's and offer anymore than a few megs of space.

      Let the revolution begin....

    111. Re:Stunning by skotte · · Score: 1

      that's absurd.

      what ISPs are these people using that keep going under? I've had my roadrunner account since 98, and I used my previous ISP's email since 94. I only changed then because i moved to broadband (and hooray to the inventor of the mail-forward-bot).

      a little research into your ISP's credibility and business model goes an awful long way.
      (which is not to suggest roadrunner is an honest bunch, but they do know how to stay afloat thru bubble or burst).

    112. Re:Stunning by Patrick+Mannion · · Score: 1

      the same goes with MSN... any @msn.com account is pretty much just a @hotmail.com account. I have one myself, and it's full of spam and doesn't have that great big 1000 mb storage like Gmail. However, I sent my friend an invite a few days ago and she recieved it perfectly fine with no missing email. So I'd say I'm lucky. Also, I'd say that MSN and Yahoo! are just afraid of losing customers from their services, which seems weird to me becuase most of them are free and small percentage are paid for or are provided as part of an dial-up or broadband plan.

      --
      In America, you spam computers In Soviet Russia, computers spam you!
    113. Re:Stunning by xkenny13 · · Score: 1

      An email service blocking emails from a competing email service is surprising.

      FWIW, I just sent a test message from my GMail account to my Hotmail account. The message got through just fine.

      I don't have any invites to send out, so I wasn't able to test that.

      Maybe Microsoft "fixed" it since this news story broke ... but I kinda doubt they'd move that fast.

    114. Re:Stunning by Patrick+Mannion · · Score: 1

      To back my last comment, this is taken from the MSN Hotmail website... You can use your Hotmail or MSN e-mail address and password to sign in to all .NET Passport participating sites and services.

      --
      In America, you spam computers In Soviet Russia, computers spam you!
    115. Re:Stunning by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1

      I've had GetMail forwarding my MSN email to my new gmail account I got yesterday, and last night it stopped working. I was wondering what was going on because I could log into MSN and see my emails kept getting bounced and gotten bigger because I was forwarding then erasing messages, but they'd bounce back with error info to enlarge the email.

    116. Re:Stunning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Sigh. I dunno what's worse: the fact that this kid's an idiot, or that your daughter is attracted to him. Either way, I'd vote "YES" on the next school budget...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    117. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have an account with poboxes.com (not pobox.com). They used to be free but asked for a one time "donation". I signed up and "donated". Then, after a while, they threatened to start inserting ads in my e-mail, despite my previous "donation", but offered me a lifetime account without ads for a one time fee of $10. So I paid up the $10 even though things were starting to smell fishy. Then, sometime later, they demanded that I begin to pay a new yearly fee. When I pointed out the previous lifetime agreement, they responded that they had new ownership and so weren't obligated to honor previous agreements. So I told them to forget it.

      Well, I had my poboxes.com address forwarded to an address that had never been given to anyone but poboxes.com. That address then began to be flooded with spam. In addition, people who sent e-mail to my old poboxes.com address suddenly began to receive spam purporting to be from me.

      Moral of the story: Unless you actually own the domain name you will be vulnerable to extortion from whoever does, regardless of any agreements to the contrary. For that reason, I can't recommend any e-mail forwarding "services".

    118. Re:Stunning by ryanwright · · Score: 2, Funny

      Real ISPs come and go, you are not in college forever, and you dont keep the same job forever. However, you CAN keep one of these "second-rate" email addresses indefinitely.

      Private domain: $8 a year.
      Virtual server on a high speed backbone: $20 a month.
      Having unlimited email addresses you can keep for the rest of your life: Priceless.

      But I charge mine to American Express.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    119. Re:Stunning by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it's legal, but it's certainly unethical.

      I'm not so sure. Hotmail is simple refusing to carry GMail traffic. It is kind of like how the Post Office does not deal in UPS or Fed Ex traffic... you cannot send a UPS or Fed Ex package to a Post Office Box. If you want your Fed Ex package to get where it needs to go, you cannot use USPS Post Office Boxes. Is what the Post Office does 'unethical'? Now, it would be a fine public service if the Post Office would recieve UPS packages, but I don't think that's 'unethical'.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    120. Re:Stunning by decepty · · Score: 1

      Actually... My ISP is Yahoo!... So unless I've been living a lie for the past year and a half, uh, how is Yahoo NOT an ISP?

      Thank you, try again...

      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
    121. Re:Stunning by Badaro · · Score: 1

      I still don't buy it. In the past week I sent about 5 invites for each domain, and everyone has confirmed recieving the invite properly.

      []s Badaro

      --
      My sig became obsolete, and I lack the imagination to create a new one. :(
    122. Re:Stunning by decepty · · Score: 1

      or spend $12/year to register a domain through 1and1.com...

      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
    123. Re:Stunning by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      and change it at a moment's notice (unlike personal domains).
      Say what? I can have 1000s of email addresses if it like at my personal domain. And I can change the email addresses as often as I see fit. Plus One is available for my mother, sister, and everyone else I know and care to offer an email address.

      Besides, your gonna need to change addresses at least every 2 years, maybe sooner.

    124. Re:Stunning by decepty · · Score: 1

      I used to think I knew everything about computers, and then I got a job working with them... Now I realize that the smartest computer people are the ones that realize they don't know dick.

      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
    125. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my college we get to keep our campus e-mail address for the rest of our lives, so it's just as permanent as a Yahoo! e-mail account. :)

    126. Re:Stunning by skotte · · Score: 1

      You know, the more i think about it, the sillier your observation. Most people i know who have a yahoo account burn thru them like toilet paper.

      They are disposable accounts.

      getting too much spam? get a new address. avoiding annoying people? get a new address. someone give you a clever new nickname? get a new address.

    127. Re:Stunning by legojenn · · Score: 1
      Or pay $12 a year for pobox.com redirection and spam filtering.

      Yes pobox.com is a great service which I used for about five years and still recommend to friends but at the end of the day you're still dependent on them staying in business and not unreasonably raising prices etc

      A .com domain registration including free email forwarding is only $7.95 per year now at GoDaddy. That's probably a better deal if you're about to go through the pain of changing addresses and you really want the confidence of being able to keep the address forever. If GoDaddy became a problem then you can always move the domain elsewhere.

      I use zoneedit for my domain name. You can set up DNS, dynamic DNS on it or if you don't have the skill or the need, it also provides web and mail forwards. The best part is that unless you use some insane amount of their bandwidth, it's free.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    128. Re:Stunning by pvt_medic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yes privacy, because yahoo on the bottom of there pages says it collects personal info, but they do it for a good reason i bet and google doesnt

      --
      30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
      Score:5, Troll
    129. Re:Stunning by jacem · · Score: 1

      Party on dude. Collage is not just an education it is a lifestyle choice.

      Jacem

      --
      DOC Disinformation Obfuscation and Confusion
      The carrot to FUD's stick
    130. Re:Stunning by trewornan · · Score: 1
      you CAN keep one of these "second-rate" email addresses indefinitely

      Another solution is to get a shell account somewhere free (eg metawire) and forward email from that account to wherever you want. I've had a free shell account forwarding mail for over 5 years.

    131. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's clearly need for replication of the experiment here.

      isilmo@hotmail.com

    132. Re:Stunning by masterQba · · Score: 1

      I have a university account for 4 years now, whilst I got thrown out of the university 2 years ago. So with quite a lot of propability I can say that in 5 years time I should still have my university account. Maybe in the US your account is deleted when you leave college, but that kind of misses the point of an email account and address.
      Another good way is to have a friend admin, who has a server of his own and can setup an account for you.

      --
      xb0x
    133. Re:Stunning by jacem · · Score: 1

      My only problem with that is if they start to use those keywords to profile me. I don't want google or any one for that mater knowing that I recieved 210 e-mails with the word f**k in them over the last two months.

      JACEM

      --
      DOC Disinformation Obfuscation and Confusion
      The carrot to FUD's stick
    134. Re:Stunning by tetranz · · Score: 1

      GoDaddy also provide free dns so if your needs are simple then you may as well have everything in one place. I'm not necessarily pushing GoDaddy, plenty of other registrars (eg mydomain.com) provide these extra services too but if someone wants a really simple way to get a lifetime address, I haven't found a simpler or cheaper way.

    135. Re:Stunning by sinikal · · Score: 0

      I would like to give this a shot too, I'll let you know how it turns out.

      rage_4411@yahoo.com
      rage_4411@hotmail.com

    136. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be noted... Hotmail (and Yahoo I assume) are only indefinite if you check in every couple of months. If you let them go for a while, your account is gone.

    137. Re:Stunning by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 1

      I guess it would seem silly if you had no permanent friends that you want to correspond with. I personally would become pretty annoyed if I could never send you an email at the same address twice. Of course you should use throw away addresses for websites and shady people, but we are talking about your main email address, the one you could give to your Aunt Mildred.

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    138. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comparison breaks down.

      If everyone *had* to use PO boxes instead of having regular house boxes, the post office would be required to accept competitors mail, like the local phone company has to allow competitors to use their lines.

      How about phone service? Would it be ok for people not to receive phone calls because they caller was using a different service provider?

    139. Re:Stunning by Space+Coyote · · Score: 1

      It's true that Microsoft has every right to have as crappy a service as they like. It's also true that we have every right to point this out. Which is what is happening. So it's all good.

      --
      ___
      Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    140. Re:Stunning by LabRat007 · · Score: 1

      I got gmail invite from a buddy. He sent the message to my yahoo account but I couldnt find it. Turns out it was in my bulk mail (ie spam box) the whole time. I was able to get the message in time to sign up (expires in 3 weeks from delivery time). I really have to wonder about yahoo's intentions here as well.

      --
      "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
    141. Re:Stunning by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 1

      Real ISPs come and go, you are not in college forever, and you dont keep the same job forever. However, you CAN keep one of these "second-rate" email addresses indefinitely.

      Yes, but you can also get your own Internet domain for very little money and keep it even if your service provider goes bust.

    142. Re:Stunning by wwaaves · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally have sent at least 8 invitations to people with hotmail accounts and 7 of them have signed up. If hotmail is blocking gmail then monkeys are lining up inside my ass and getting ready to fly.

    143. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I'm arguing, but...

      yes, you are.

    144. Re:Stunning by eaber81 · · Score: 1

      Even though you are not in college forever, many universities (Ohio University in particular, but I know of many others that do to) allow you to keep your e-mail account for life. Not only as a kind gesture, but as a way to keep track of you.

    145. Re:Stunning by zurab · · Score: 1
      Yes, but your city council does not put the "No Solicitors" sign on your door for you, and give you no option to remove it if you happen to enjoy solicitors.

      I don't like the analogy, but if you continue through with it, then yes - both Yahoo! and Hotmail offer you an option to disable spam filters in which case everything will arrive in your inbox.
    146. Re:Stunning by digitalPortal · · Score: 1

      how about I send you a postcard from spain in exchange fot the invite??? if feeling gracious please send to: tom at digitalportal dot com mucho appreciated! will post back stats as soon as I can figure out how to setup an account.

    147. Re:Stunning by Draknek · · Score: 1

      My friend invited me earlier today.

      Or at least, he told me he invited me. The actual invite didn't turn up until 15 minutes later.

      And then when I tried to sign up, I got an error message:

      Server Error
      Gmail is temporarily unavailable. Cross your fingers and try again in a few minutes. We're sorry for the inconvenience.

      It swallowed my invite code, and whenever I try to log in, it gives me that message.

      I'm annoyed, to say the least.

      --
      Self-referential sigs do not a humourous poster make.
    148. Re:Stunning by TechnoLust · · Score: 1

      I sent one to my girlfriend's email this morning and it arrived in seconds. I received confirmation that her account had been created not long after that.

      --
      "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
    149. Re:Stunning by TechnoLust · · Score: 1

      She has a hotmail account, BTW. I should have specified that in the first comment.

      --
      "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
    150. Re:Stunning by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1
      The first line of the post: Emails and invitations sent to Hotmail from Gmail accounts do not bounce, but nor do they arrive in the recipient's Inbox - they vanish mysteriously into the aether.

      I'm guessing he thought emails and invitations were both bounced because it SAYS emails and invitations were both bounced. This is one of those funny ones because you don't even have to read the article - the SUBJECT says this as well. What exactly DID you read?

    151. Re:Stunning by Flexagon · · Score: 1

      Well, the articles mentions that some email providers are blocking GMail due to privacy concerns. Seems like a bunch of hogwash to me.

      Sure does. If my ISP is trying to protect me from what it views as generic privacy problems at gmail, what about all of my other recipients (and the closure of those they correspond with) when 1) they are hit with a virus that spews my address or other info everywhere; 2) too-wide discovery in a court that unnecessarily exposes my information (read: start with the entire hard disk); 3) some person in the closure set simply being a jerk? Or worse, my own ISP selling access to me. My ISP is doing precious little about those, they are much more realistic threats, and my ISP has virtually no control (or standing) over some of them. At least I can read gmail's privacy policy, know that it will get discussed in communities like this one, and have some expectation that they will enforce it, unlike smaller ISPs and distant recipients-of-recipients. So why even consider targeting gmail for such a reason?

    152. Re:Stunning by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Informative
      My only problem with that is if they start to use those keywords to profile me. I don't want google or any one for that mater knowing that I recieved 210 e-mails with the word f**k in them over the last two months.`

      If you don't want computerized algorithms running over your e-mail on a daily basis, there are two things you should do;

      1. Run your own e-mail server
      2. PGP-encrypt all outgoing / request (demand) all incoming mail be likewise encrypeted.

      Otherwise, I hate to say it, but your e-mail is analyzed by every server it passes through. As for profiling, well, that's the norm. But think of it this way - you're getting e-mail for free. What did you expect? They give you 1 gigabyte of free storage on a highly advanced, redundant, failure-resistant geographically diverse network for ... FREE. If they profile you, sorry, but you have no right to blow the "Privacy" trumpet. You get what you pay for.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    153. Re:Stunning by joNDoty · · Score: 1

      I just received a gmail invite through hotmail today, and it got to my inbox without a hitch. Anyone interested in what a gmail invite LOOKS like? (Thanks Andrew!)

      Andrew Hitchcock has invited you to open a free Google Gmail account. The
      invitation will expire in three weeks and can only be used to set up one
      account.

      To accept this invitation and register for your account, visit
      http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-283e1504a1- 9ddaa31 ab4

      Once you create your account, Andrew Hitchcock will be notified with your new @gmail.com address so you can stay in touch with Gmail!

      If you haven't already heard about Gmail, it's a new search-based webmail
      service that offers:

      - 1,000 megabytes (one gigabyte) of free storage
      - Built-in Google search that instantly finds any message you want
      - Automatic arrangement of messages and related replies into "conversations"
      - Text ads and related pages that are relevant to the content of your messages

      Gmail is still in an early stage of development. If you set up an account, you'll be able to keep it even after we make Gmail more widely available and as one of the system's early testers, you will be helping us improve the service through your feedback. We might ask for your comments and suggestions periodically and we appreciate your
      help in making Gmail even better.

      Thanks,

      The Gmail Team

    154. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I would second huzaa for forwarding except that I don't think Ive had an account yet that lets you just forward all recieved mails to one address.

      The interface at lycos for example only lets you manually forward an individual email at a time. Guess what yahoo? I don't fucking find that useful.

    155. Re:Stunning by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      I don't like the analogy, but if you continue through with it, then yes - both Yahoo! and Hotmail offer you an option to disable spam filters in which case everything will arrive in your inbox.

      That depends if they are being considered spam, or being dropped altogether. Nobody seems real clear on that yet.

      Otherwise, I agree with your point.

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    156. Re:Stunning by joNDoty · · Score: 1

      Woah, my gmail invite came through on hotmail just fine, but Yahoo blocked a second one! I just found a gmail invite among hundreds of spams I haven't deleted in my bulk email folder.

      Oh well, looks like I have my first spare invite to give to a friend! :-D

    157. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Actually, the real solution is to take $50 or so and invest in your own domain name and domain based email hosting with a reputable company."

      That's per year to anyone considering it. Nice if you have a website anyway, or to share costs with a family, but not as cheap as a yahoo address.

    158. Re:Stunning by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "Well, the articles mentions that some email providers are blocking GMail due to privacy concerns"

      Yet somehow not blocking Yahoo! Mail because of privacy concerns, nor blocking Hotmail because of privacy concerns. Really, how many (if any) such webmail services have good privacy guarantees?

    159. Re:Stunning by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      Or pay $12 a year for pobox.com redirection and spam filtering. No ads, and you can send the mail to whatever real e-mail account you like, and change it at a moment's notice (unlike personal domains).

      If I add a line to my "aliases" file, I'll create an alias to my account. Within seconds I can create one or several e-mail accounts. I can create upwards of a hundred million unique e-mail addresses at my personal domain. I can then create, likewise, up to a hundred million unique sub-domains, each of which can carry hundreds of millions of unique e-mail addresses.

      It is my "real e-mail account" without paying for each address, I can host or forward it to any destination that suits my fancy - again with a one-liner in an alias or forward file. (I can also use a fandazzled web based interface to accomplish the same goal).

      All I have to pay is $30/year for my domain and the cost of the bandwidth I'm already using. If I wanted to, I could charge friends/family a flat or even annual fee for a selection of addresses. ($5/year for 10 addresses with high storage volume, IMAP(s), POP3(s), SMTP (with secure login), secure shell with Pine, and web mail sounds like a good deal, no? 10 people taking advantage of that 'deal' and I've paid for my domain and put $30 in my pocket)

      The best part? I don't have to worry about anybody going out of business, changing business models, changing their ad structure, or changing ownership. If the .org registry goes belly up, well, it's about quits for a large chunk of the Internet anyways and my vanity domain is the least of my worries. ;)

      Broadband ISPs are a dime-a-dozen in Ontario so if one folds I can be connected in hours to a new one (there's already a line-card installed, so I can have a login with a new DSL provider in minutes, actually).

      It all depends on how much you're willing to put up with. Free webmail providers come and go. Some are better than others, some are better at earning money. E-mail forwarders are in the same boat - throw a cookie and you'll hit a dozen of 'em. If we got a thousand people in a room we'd probably get a thousand different reccomendations. Me, I'm happy with my Snerk.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    160. Re:Stunning by Kludge · · Score: 1

      That's great... until pobox.com tanks or gets bought out by someone who shuts it down.

      Buying a domain is the only real solution.

    161. Re:Stunning by adiposity · · Score: 1

      I would like to test this as well. lllammme@hotmail.com -Dan

    162. Re:Stunning by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      He comes back with "darkmagik##########", where "#" is a long, meaningless (to me) string of numbers. I tell him there's no way I'm putting crap like that on my server. I also let him know that darkmagik.com is available, and he could be anything@darkmagik.com.

      This isn't necessarily human ignorance - my email/user name for most email accounts is usually followed by a string of numbers which are meaningful to me - even on websites when I could choose something simple like "Tim", more often than not it will be "timmyf2371" as the numbers to the end are "mine".

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    163. Re:Stunning by BlueJay465 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree with you. Back in the mid-late 90s yahoo, hotmail (pre-MS), and other providers were easily paying over $100 per gig of space. Why, back in day, 1995 I believe...

      I fondly remember those days installing those newfangled Western Digital 1.6 GB Caviar drives working at the Mom & Pop Computer Shop. Those puppies were selling like hotcakes for about $200, and I remember having to walk a mile to and from the bus stop where I had to ride for an half hour trip and hoof it for another mile, barefoot, in the snow, uphill both directions....with only 2400 baud.

      AND BY GOLLY WE LIKED IT!

      Almost 10 years later, you kids have it so easy these days. They keep making the drives bigger and faster and cheaper and smaller. These days a 160GB drive only goes for a measly 77 clams. Oh yeah, those guys over at Google were smart. Establish their presence first, and invest in ungodly amounts of hard drive space for dirt cheap. It's 2004, why on earth wouldn't those companies that did it in the 90s be pissed off about it.

      HEY, GET OFF MY LAWN YOU DAMN KIDS!

    164. Re:Stunning by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 1

      I've had problems with Hotmail delaying emails for a long time. I've often tried to send emails from my college account to my hotmail account, and end up not receiving it for as much as two days. I've even given up using my hotmail account for web registrations, because I've found that some websites require a response in 24 hours or the registration is cancelled... and the message appears two days later. The only reason I even bother keeping my hotmail account is that I use it for MSN messenger, because many of the people I know insist on using MSN.

      In summary, Hotmail bad.

      --
    165. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm,

      Dont know when this went into effect, but I got my gmail invite last friday, DIE HOTMAIL DIE.

    166. Re:Stunning by kjd · · Score: 1

      Chicks do NOT dig that.

    167. Re:Stunning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      True...but remember, what you get for that ~$50 is complete control over and complete reliability for your email. Something every self respecting "geek" should have. Something EVERYBODY should have.

      If they only thing you worry about with computing is COST, then yeah, get a yahoo account. Personally I like being lord host of dasmegabyte.org. I like being able to do whatever the fuck I want. And I like the look people give me when I tell them my email address. Yeah, I run my own server. Yeah, I have a website. Yeah, the pictures from your wedding are up there and you can download them at 20 meg per second. Isn't that the promise of the interenet age -- that everybody and his grandmother can put their content online? And why use an inferior service just 'cos it's "free?"

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    168. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree though

    169. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't use the Gmail account often but I did get it bounced back from a spam filter from a corporate email server. (it shall remain nameless except only to me, the corp. and Google's AdSense(grrr!).
      I let Google's tech support know that I could send the same message from my ISP account and it went through fine, but, when I originally sent it via Gmail, the spam filter on the other end just kicked my message to the curb. It wasn't the message or the subject line that caused it to blocked, it was just the fact that it was Gmail. That's the only thing I could figure out.
      Tech support asked for the info the mail server sent upon blocking and I haven't heard back about what they know.
      Google does know that some mail servers are spam filtering stuff from Gmail. And, have know for at least a month.

    170. Re:Stunning by luna69 · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the short-sighted response.

      The fact is that registering a domain, which can then be hosted by any number of el-cheapo hosting companies to do nothing more than host an email address is so cheap, and so easy, that it's a reasonable, useful, and - to respond to your criticism of the lack of permanency - PERMANENT solution to having to rely on a half-baked, "free" service.

      Your hosting company shuts down? So what: there are hundreds more who are happy to park your domain & provide an email account - one that you can control, and that won't serve you ads. Bingo: your have a permanent, portable, self-controlled-and-administered email account, with none of the REAL privacy & reliability issues that poeople experience all the time with Yahoo, Hotmail, etc.

      --
      No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
    171. Re:Stunning by Minstrel+Boy · · Score: 1
      And what do you use for your contact email for that domain, exactly? I know what *I* use - one of those "second-rate" free email accounts!

      KeS

    172. Re:Stunning by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      You know, in principle, I agree with that, but surely there's a limit.

      At the moment, I'm typing from a 'free' computer at the public library, donated by Bill & Co and maintained by the public dole. I decided to check out some info on gmail, so I clicked on their site, and, lo and behold, Explorer won't load the 'sign in' page. All I see is 'Action Cancelled'.

      Now, normally I might chalk this up to 'bofh-ish' behaviour on the part of the library sysadmin, but the funny thing is there's a twelve year old next to me playing a first-person-shooter on Yahoo! games, so I know there can't be *too* many restrictions.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    173. Re:Stunning by devnullify · · Score: 1

      Or you can have ZoneEdit forward all your domain's e-mail to another account of your choice. For free.

    174. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      =) i'm in a generous mood

    175. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless your ISP is SBC, then you get a Yahoo! account (even though its @sbcglobal.net).

      Note the words "real ISP". . .just kidding, but that is probably the worst part about SBC's internet access.

    176. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I was in college, it was for only four years. Guess not everybody has it the same way...

    177. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It arrived just fine, story is busted :)

      Thx for the invite

    178. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Jees. take a valium and chill. youre gonna have yourself a heart attack.

      The original article in the blog this morning suggested that changing the text in the Gmail invitation allowed it to go through.

      Leaving the original text unaltered caused it to be blocked.

      The implication being gmail invitations specifically were being blocked and not the Gmail domain.

      Forget the slashdot header - read the article it relates to.

    179. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Now now Grumpy Gus. take a breather

      The original article in the blog this morning suggested that changing the text in the Gmail invitation allowed it to go through.

      Leaving the original text unaltered caused it to be blocked.

      The implication being gmail invitations specifically were being blocked and not the Gmail domain.

      Forget the slashdot header - read the article it relates to.

    180. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original article in the blog this morning suggested that changing the text in the Gmail invitation allowed it to go through.

      Leaving the original text unaltered caused it to be blocked.

      The implication being gmail invitations specifically were being blocked and not the Gmail domain.

      Forget the slashdot header - read the article it relates to.

    181. Re:Stunning by h3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      BUT I set up my yahoo account 10 years ago, and yes I had a college account,

      Erm... Yahoo account 10 years ago? I'm pretty sure Yahoo was just a tilde account at stanford.edu 10 years ago, or just getting started at yahoo.com. I don't think they had "accounts" til much, much later.

      http://docs.yahoo.com/info/misc/history.html

      Just a little historical eyebrow-raise. Unless your name happens to be "Jerry Yang" or "David Filo", in which case, my apologies.

      -h3

    182. Re:Stunning by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1

      I got a gMail invite from somebody two days ago. It took a whopping 10 seconds to be delivered (I was talking to them as they sent it).

      My college's e-mail can sometimes take hours, maybe days. Usually not. But it happens. With the sheer number of people using hotmail to get gMail invites, it doesn't surprise me in the slightest that some got slowed down in the aether.

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    183. Re:Stunning by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 1

      I agree with the AC...

      but just because you brought it up, the signature sould read:

      Karma: Excellent

      --
      http://brandonbloom.name
    184. Re:Stunning by Dasein · · Score: 1

      Heh. I remember installing RLL drive controller cards with MFM drives so we could get 1.5x the disk space. We got another 10 meg for free!!!!

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    185. Re:Stunning by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 1

      I am an idiot for not using preview... correction:

      Karma: <Speak Voice="Mr.Burns>Excellent</Speak>

      p.s. This post was HTML instead of "Plain Old Text" and yes I did put the " /" at the end of my br tags!

      --
      http://brandonbloom.name
    186. Re:Stunning by HeLLFiRe1151 · · Score: 1

      It would certainly fall under unfair competition.

      --
      I've got 101 mod points and you can't have them!
    187. Re:Stunning by 10bt · · Score: 1

      the controversy stems from google parsing the content of your emails and generating keyword lists, etc. that determine what ads to display. of course all mail servers touch your emails, but if you liken servers to the mailman then whereas other servers touch your mail to deliver it from A to B, gmail opens up your mail during his lunch break to peek inside before delivering to B.

      if i want to email my best friend to tell him that i like to masturbate while watching smurfs, that is my business; i don't want anybody to parse my mail, human or otherwise. what if later on google decides to sponsor banner ads from stockholder pressure to make more profit -- will i be inundated with graphic images pitching toys for men? i don't want to be profiled, and by parsing all your mail google is more than halfway there.

    188. Re:Stunning by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1

      Update: Just sent two hotmail users invites. Both got 'em within minutes.

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    189. Re:Stunning by metalmaniac1759 · · Score: 1

      Well, GMail might decide to scrap the "get invited" thing, and whaddya know the whole world might have a GMail account.

      Yahoo! and Hotmail should improve their services rather than play these underhand tricks.

      Nandz.

    190. Re:Stunning by oisteink · · Score: 1

      Are you a truck?

    191. Re:Stunning by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Read it again. The "unlike personal domains" is that I can redirect stuff *instantly*. I don't have to wait for DNS propagation and watch days of mail vanish into a black hole if my web and mail host turns out to be run by a crook. (And yes, it happened.)

      There's no 100% safety unless you run the whole thing yourself--DNS servers, mail servers, the lot. I've done that, but it's expensive for an end user.

      Pobox have been around for ten years providing good service, during which time I've had to switch web and mail hosts at short notice three times. Each time, I would have lost mail if I'd had to mess with DNS. I therefore conclude that pobox.com is *less* risky than a custom domain; so even though I *have* a custom domain, I don't use it as my primary e-mail address.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    192. Re:Stunning by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you can't instantly change which SMTP server the mail goes to, if your mail host suddenly goes out of business or turns out to be run by a crook. Which has happened to me, and if I'd been using my personal domain as my primary e-mail address, I'd have been without mail for days. As it was, I redirected pobox mail elsewhere--end of problem.

      Guess what--the risks you apply to pobox also apply to the companies that handle your DNS, SMTP and IMAP. Yeah, you can be up and running somewhere else in minutes... and then you can wait a couple of days for DNS to propagate the change around the world.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    193. Re:Stunning by metamatic · · Score: 1

      That's great... until your DNS or mail hosts tank.

      I have a domain. It has been less reliable than pobox redirection, because of domain and mail hosting companies tanking.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    194. Re:Stunning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Heh. i create a circular reference. Domain.com points to domain.net points to domain.org.

      I have a lot of trust in my co-loc.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    195. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I might be wrong of course...
      But Im 28 now. And, it was my first year in college. As far as I can remember I was 18->19 in my first year. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe it was second year. But, yahoo has been going for a while...I was not the first with a web account, although I only knew of others with Hotmail accounts.

    196. Re:Stunning by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      I'm not up on this invite thing. I assume you have to be invited into the gmail service. Is that right? Could you do me please? thedocisn AAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTt yahoo.com. Thanks

    197. Re:Stunning by minion · · Score: 1

      I have lost touch with many people because they changed email addresses and never told anyone.


      Sounds to me like your friends needed to spend $15 a year and buy their own domain name.

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
    198. Re:Stunning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, for god's sake turn off your spam filter. Because that shit is reading your email and generating keyword lists etc. It's profiling your email! Why, the whitelist on your Bayesian filter is FULL of shit you like to talk about. Just think if the cops got ahold of that one!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    199. Re:Stunning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      You *COULD* just come up with a clever name. One people will remember, one that means something to you, one that won't go out of fashion and doesn't make you look like a number in a herd (though yours is by no means as bad as some). With infinite possibilities, many of them spelled correctly and very badass, you should be able to find SOMETHING that defines you, sans numeros.

      Oh, and don't use das Megabyte. That's taken.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    200. Re:Stunning by strider_starslayer · · Score: 1

      Say as long as nice people are handing out G-mail invites under the guise of testing, can I get one too?

      strider_starslayer@hotmail.com

      --
      -Millions of Monkeys, Millions of typewriters, 6 hours of sorting through faeces encrusted pages to find: This post
    201. Re:Stunning by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      Until pobox.com goes out of business. With your own domain, all you have to do is move to another service provider.

      --
      Martin
    202. Re:Stunning by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      You can get hosting for a lot less than $20 a month, but I guess that wasn't the point.

      --
      Martin
    203. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that for Hotmail, at least, their filters aren't standardized across all their servers.

      Some of their servers block any email coming from my server, others don't. It's odd, especially when you consider that the mail server IP isn't on any blocklists, but I digress.

    204. Re:Stunning by AigariusDebian · · Score: 1

      Yust to join the list of invite askers, aigarius@koyanet.lv would appreciate an invite, thanks :).

    205. Re:Stunning by feargal · · Score: 1

      Christ, if you're going to troll, at least get it right: you left out a doublequote.

      Karma: <span style="voice-family: Mr-Burns, evil, male">Excellent</span>

      Use the "Extrans" option to display HTML in a post.

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
    206. Re:Stunning by digitalarena · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they want to keep their customer base "private" from competitors :)

      Get those blinkers on lads, another volley of Gmail is coming over...

    207. Re:Stunning by edhall · · Score: 1

      This is why you set up an alternate MX domain. Have a friend set up his SMTP server to relay your mail (and perhaps vice versa in a barter arrangement), and add an MX record to your DNS. Your ISP can disappear from the face of the earth and your mail will just queue up on your friend's server until you get your domain set up again.

      Of course, this doesn't work if you share ISP's. Also, it's important that you have the same sort of redundancy with DNS (perhaps via a similar arrangement). But if you're hardcore enough to set up your own SMTP server it's important to arrange for a backup -- you will need it, eventually.

      -Ed
    208. Re:Stunning by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    209. Re:Stunning by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I even know anybody who finished in 4 years.

      OTOH, my university catered largely to people who worked part or full time as well as studying..

    210. Re:Stunning by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      You can get hosting for a lot less than $20 a month, but I guess that wasn't the point.

      I said "virtual server." That means I have full root access to my own server (actually user mode Linux, but it looks and acts exactly like a dedicated server - I can install whatever services I like, I have a static IP, a few gigs of disk space, etc). I also said "on a high speed backbone." How high speed? I don't know, but it's faster than work, and we have an OC-12.

      If you can get that for less than $20 a month, I'd love to know how. :)

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    211. Re:Stunning by slimak · · Score: 1

      No, my sig is correct. You have obviously never used my proprietary voice scripting language. It's very powerful.

    212. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too have both a hotmail and a yahoo account, let us continue to prove that this is a busted post.

      jzvolley69@yahoo.com
      jzvolley69@hotmail.com

      Jake

    213. Re:Stunning by KiDas · · Score: 1

      if you have one more invite in you... send it this way please: kd_121@hotmail.com (for testing purposes ;-))

      --

      A distinctive mark, characteristic, or sound indicating identity
    214. Re:Stunning by calmansi · · Score: 1

      If you put "hotmail" in google, the first hit you get is "Sign-in Access Error" corresponding to www.hotmail.com Hotmail has been working dismally for a long time, and is clogging up altogether now. S it's big corporation's inefficiency rather than censorship, maybe.

    215. Re:Stunning by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 1

      I am so ashamed...

      I had it right in my first post... hehe

      --
      http://brandonbloom.name
    216. Re:Stunning by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1

      Except it's NOT happening. I've dealt out 3 invites to hotmail accounts, one to yahoo. I GOT one at MY hotmail account. Not a single one was filtered.

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    217. Re:Stunning by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      Ah, but you can't instantly change which SMTP server the mail goes to
      10 MX mail.snerk.org
      20 MX mail.somewherelse.com

      Not only do I have built-in redundancy, I have protection against one of our ISPs going "out of business or turns out to be run by a crook".

      and then you can wait a couple of days for DNS to propagate the change around the world.

      Even if your TTLs are set to 24 hours (87480 seconds :P ), that means 1 day of e-mail bouncing/queuing on remote sites (many/most users probably won't even notice). If you're at all worried, set the TTLs to 1 hour and you're up and running before your next pot of coffee's brewed. Furthermore, if you're planning a heirarchal change in your domain you could (should) drop the TTLs to 5-15 minutes. Your DNS server load will go up (but on a vanity domain that's completely negligible) but if you do it right, nobody will notice anything with regards to your e-mail delivery.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    218. Re:Stunning by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if I had the cash for two web hosting services, I'd just run the whole thing myself...

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    219. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I receive email from a friend of mine who uses gmail and I use hotmail. No problems here.

  2. Unable to verify... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another.

    But I won't let that stop me from posting it! ;)

    1. Re:Unable to verify... by tssm0n0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But this was such a well researched posting. I like how it contradicts itself:
      Emails and invitations sent to Hotmail from Gmail accounts do not bounce...invitations he sent to a Hotmail address bounced

    2. Re:Unable to verify... by hafree · · Score: 5, Informative

      I received a Gmail invite through my hotmail account just yesterday without any problems.

    3. Re:Unable to verify... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      Color me tinfoil, but it suspiciously looks like Hemos is fishing for a Gmail invite.

    4. Re:Unable to verify... by stevesliva · · Score: 4, Informative

      For what it's worth, I received a Gmail invite through my Hotmail account on Friday without any problems.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    5. Re:Unable to verify... by alecks · · Score: 0

      How does one get these invites? I sure would like one

    6. Re:Unable to verify... by Apiakun · · Score: 1

      Send me an email to tikora@gmail.com with your first and last name and I'll send you an invite.

    7. Re:Unable to verify... by lovemayo · · Score: 1

      I recieved 3 invites today on my hotmail account. this article seems like bullshit...

    8. Re:Unable to verify... by JimDabell · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I invited somebody this morning and they accepted without any problem.

    9. Re:Unable to verify... by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      I would suspect your Hotmail spam filter option choices make a difference on what you do or do not receive.

    10. Re:Unable to verify... by d34thw15h · · Score: 1

      my invite got to my hotmail acct, and i used my hotmail and yahoo acct's to send test msgs back and forth. this is last week though.

    11. Re:Unable to verify... by Apiakun · · Score: 1

      I'm all out of invites now, so ya'll can stop emailing for now. I'll post again if I get more.

    12. Re:Unable to verify... by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

      My own invite came in to my hotmail account yesterday as well.

    13. Re:Unable to verify... by camix · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've gotten two invites one through Yahoo and one through Hotmail on Saturday (06/19/04). My younger brother also got his invite through his hotmail account on Saturday. They could be blocking them as of now, but I personnaly haven't seen it taking place from either mail provider.

    14. Re:Unable to verify... by camix · · Score: 1

      Update, yeah this is a bull$hit news post. I just tested it and I was able to send e-mail to gmail from hotmail and vice versa. If there were any issues they're resolved now and I see all mail flowing just fine.

    15. Re:Unable to verify... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      I'd just like to test this... could someone send a Gmail invite to me at phobos2@hotmail.com so I can see for myself if they're blocking it?

      Purely in a spirit of scientific inquiry, you understand...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    16. Re:Unable to verify... by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      3 invites? Put them to good use: www.gmail4troops.com or www.gmailforthetroops.com.

      ( Wil, you're good people. Remember that. \m/ )

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    17. Re:Unable to verify... by sakwin · · Score: 1

      Same story here. An invite came to my hotmail account less than five minutes after it was sent, and it wasn't filtered to junk mail or anything; showed right up in the inbox. On Friday.

    18. Re:Unable to verify... by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      ./ has become a joke. It saddens me to say this. It really does. It's been taken over by M$ suxxors, Linux r00ls crowd completely. HOW ABOUT ACTUALLY INVESTIGATING A LITTLE BIT before posting. Not just some lame note "I can't verify this?". Are you seriously trying to tell me that slashdot editors haven't gotten a gmail account? I find it hard to believe you haven't gotten an invite. If that's the case, go get a hotmail, and send an invite. This takes two minutes MAX.

      This is just pathetic. Because you know what: IT ISN'T TRUE! Period.

    19. Re:Unable to verify... by SpaceBass` · · Score: 1

      And I just sent a Gmail invite to someone at Hotmail about two hours ago, who got it and signed up almost immediately.

      --
      Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
    20. Re:Unable to verify... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone send me a Gmail invite so I can see if my hotmail account blocks it or not ;)

    21. Re:Unable to verify... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well since you are in gmail now, wanna send me an invite?

    22. Re:Unable to verify... by omicronish · · Score: 1

      I sent my entire family Gmail invitations to their Hotmail address without problems, although one of my friends did have a problem with disappearing invites with Hotmail.

    23. Re:Unable to verify... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you don't believe in the cause, they do, and they signed up to go where ordered and defend what they're told to defend.

      So what's the point?

    24. Re:Unable to verify... by Fjord · · Score: 1

      I received a gmail invite last week. I just sent myself and email with no problems (and it arrived very quickly, less than 5 seconds).

      --
      -no broken link
    25. Re:Unable to verify... by ShecoDu · · Score: 1

      I and some friends also got Gmail invites lately on our hotmail accounts (one of them had a yahoo account)

    26. Re:Unable to verify... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it'd help to have your email address...

  3. MS & Google by mfh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would expect this from Microsoft. They can blame the spam filters, to try and save face, but the simple fact is, they are simply taking a page from their own rulebook; they don't want to lose advertising revenue from people switching to Gmail, so they are breaking the law and interfering with email. If Microsoft had successfully bought Google to trash it, Gmail would not have existed at all. For those of you just tuning in, Hotmail is owned and operated by Microsoft, after they bought the service in 1998. I was a Hotmail member prior to Microsoft being involved and the service has declined significantly since the old days. Although many of the features have improved since then, the bulk of the Hotmail service is becoming increasingly unreliable for email that just "has to get there".

    In other news, we've got lots of Gmail invites for military folks here, so if you want Gmail for large files and you are a soldier, or if you want to donate your invites to soldiers, check us out. This is not just for American military, but any democratic military, such as Canada or the UK.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Either that or the Gmail invite reads like:

      LIMITED TIME OFFER!

      NATURAL ENHANCEMENT!

      ABOUT YOUR EMAIL ACCOUNT

      FREE FREE FREE FREE

      SIGN UP NOW!

      http://gmail.com

      For more info, I send you this file in order to have your advice.

    2. Re:MS & Google by Tet · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Although many of the features have improved since then, the bulk of the Hotmail service is becoming increasingly unreliable for email that just "has to get there".

      If it "just has to get there", you wouldn't be using email in the first place. But even if you are using email, why on earth would you be using Hotmail? If it's that important, you should be using your own SMTP server over which you have control. Instead, you're relying on a third party, that you're not paying, and with whom you have no service level agreement. Not a smart move for data you care about...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    3. Re:MS & Google by DaHat · · Score: 4, Informative

      so they are breaking the law and interfering with email

      Do tell, what law are they breaking? I must have missed the one which says that ISP's and other electronic mail carriers must deliver all e-mails passing through their systems.

      Hotmail, like Gmail are run on private networks and anyone using said networks are bound by the whims of their owners and operators.

    4. Re:MS & Google by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I just want to say that that is a VERY cool thing to do for the men and women who devote their lives to defending their countries. It's an often thankless job, and being away from loved ones with crappy communications makes it that much harder. Personally I think that the military needs to spend a little bit of cash on forward deployed servers so that things like that aren't needed. Why shouldn't soldiers away from home have unlimited size email boxes, if google can support it with ad revenue I think the military with their Billions and Billions can afford something that would significantly improve the moral and good will of the troops.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean they'll get targeted ads?

      PAYG Funeral Services
      International Lawyer Services
      Cheaprates on CompactFlash cards

    6. Re:MS & Google by Hassman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ya, this might be the case if the story was actually true.

      Unfortunatly, you interesting comment has gone to waste. :(

      Sorry man.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    7. Re:MS & Google by mfh · · Score: 1

      > Do tell, what law are they breaking?
      It's against federal laws to interfere with the mail service, so I think someone *could* make a case for companies interfering with email, by extension of that law.

      What if I saw a package going to your house from my competitor, and I was a Fed-ex agent? Would I be able to simply throw the package out so that you wouldn't use, say, UPS? Irregardless of whether money is involved or any contracts were involved; the act of arbitrary email delivery, to suit corporate needs over the needs of their clients, does transgress the law, one way or another. (Wiggham jokes can ensue now)

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    8. Re:MS & Google by Lozzer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Deomocratic Military? Surely an oxymoron.

      --
      Special Relativity: The person in the other queue thinks yours is moving faster.
    9. Re:MS & Google by dinivin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The act of arbitrary email delivery, to suit corporate needs over the needs of their clients, does transgress the law, one way or another.

      Then can you cite a legal case to back this statement up?

      Dinivin

    10. Re:MS & Google by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But if you extend that law, you'll give protection to spammers as well. At that point, only client-side solutions would work.

    11. Re:MS & Google by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      So you're okay with spam then?

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    12. Re:MS & Google by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would expect this from Microsoft. They can blame the spam filters, to try and save face, but the simple fact is, they are simply taking a page from their own rulebook; they don't want to lose advertising revenue from people switching to Gmail, so they are breaking the law and interfering with email.

      That Microsoft would even consider doing any such thing.
      Consider how safe your data is in a Microsoft proprietary format.

    13. Re:MS & Google by runlvl0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      > so they are breaking the law and interfering with email

      Do tell, what law are they breaking? I must have missed the one which says that ISP's and other electronic mail carriers must deliver all e-mails passing through their systems.


      I think that you're right, but I think that the confusion exists because of existing laws concerning common carriers.

      --

      Carthago delenda est!
    14. Re:MS & Google by mfh · · Score: 1

      > If it "just has to get there", you wouldn't be using email in the first place.
      I have to fully agree with you. But, if it has to be there immediately, and can't wait for a courier or if you don't happen to have a good SMTP server, Gmail is at this point, a great service. One reason, I think, I would trust Gmail over something I had whipped together, is the sheer human resources factor at Google, that they have at any given moment hundreds of folks working toward keeping things active, that these same folks are some of the best and brightest in the world, and I have just myself, or my small ISP. I guess what I'm saying is that I would trust Google over any small ISP in the land, because it goes without saying that Google has the edge at this point.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    15. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a Hotmail member for a number of years including before it was bought by Microsoft. The spam level just got out of this world with Microsoft seemingly providing no way out of the mess. So I took the plunge and went Yahoo mail. Now that they've got 100MB storage for free, I'm laughing.
      In short, if you're using Hotmail, switch to *anything* else. Hotmail is absolutely horrible.

    16. Re:MS & Google by Tet · · Score: 0, Troll
      Why shouldn't soldiers away from home have unlimited size email boxes

      Soldiers away from home should have access to email at all! That they do is a sad commentary on the state of the military. Does anyone seriously believe that the military doesn't have traitorous elements? Given them access to an easy communication mechanism is not a clever idea. Restricting communication channels for those in sensitive areas is the only sane thing to do. But that's too politically unacceptable. Sigh...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    17. Re:MS & Google by arakon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How do you suggest that they do this?

      I really wish they could do it, I'm in the military and am looking at one of those long stints away from loved ones soon... but the fact of the matter is, if it's not for official military use, it won't get funding. That and rolling cable in the desert just makes one more security issue to deal with which requires manpower we can't spare right now.

      Yeah yeah, but WIRELESS!.... is a security nightmare right now and lets face it, no matter how many times COMSEC and COMPUSEC are briefed there is always some nimrod on the network violating the security measures.

      War isn't about being comfortable, the military's primary concern is that we stay alive, not that we have email. They've actually gone to great lengths to set up call centers and email access as it is, but you could easily wait in line for 2 hours for your turn. But trust me when I tell you that those connections that are allowed are closely monitored (fewer connections mean fewer resources required to monitor them).

      Warfare is as much about information control as manpower these days.

      --
      "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."
    18. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does a GMail invitation not fall under non-commercial unsolicited mail?

      As it is explicitly an *invitation*, it logically must be unsolicited. If you are asking for it, it can be argued it isn't an invitation at all, but an acceptance response.

      GMail is a service offered by a company. Therefore these other mail services could easily class their invites as spam and remove them.

      Your analogy is rubbish. Its more like if the customer had asked FedEx to stop any unsolicited adverts arriving, then an unsolicited package which invite from a commercial company to take up their services (e.g. credit cards/loans) came through FedEx and they stopped it.

    19. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it be illegal?

      How about unfair buisness practices? Aren't those illegal?

    20. Re:MS & Google by sffubs · · Score: 1

      To be perfectly honest, if it just has to get there, I wouldn't rely on an email server that I run. I'm much happier entrusting my email to a company that employs people specifically to provide a reliable email service.

      Having said that, I agree entirely that relying on a free service, where those who run it have no obligation to you, is perhaps not the best idea.

      That's why I pay fastmail to do my email, and so far they haven't let me down.

      --
      ݼ)s$æúßðíÊ'öX'îò5^àûßQç£
    21. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll??

      I thought it was pretty funny.

    22. Re:MS & Google by Sir+dies+alot · · Score: 1

      Nope sorry, no extension would work. Not too long ago, the Supreme Court ruled that email, unlike regular mail, was public domain. This means that there is no law that states you can not read someone else's email. This important distinction clearly separates email from regular mail, so you can bet that any decent lawyer will throw that Supreme Court ruling in your face if you try and bridge the gap between email and regular mail. Note: IANAL so if a lawyer could back this up or refute it, that'd be great.

      --
      The stupidity of your average American is just about the same as the average European, we simply show it off better.
    23. Re:MS & Google by NighthawkFoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is good stuff - I wish I had mod points.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
      - Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    24. Re:MS & Google by PudriK · · Score: 1

      I second this.

      I don't know who said being in the military was a thankless job...

      Random people thank me whenever I'm in uniform, plus there's the health care, MWR, a pension that starts immediately after 20 years of service, military discounts at stores... you can't beat the benefits. Thank YOU, American tax-payer.

      Heck, a few decades ago you had to wait for mail call to get letters and care packages that could be months old. Now you can email, make phone calls at call centers, the troops have it a lot better than they used to.

      And he's right, too much communications access can be bad. There is always some nimrod who breaks ComSec and ruins it for everyone else. I was down in the Caribbean a couple years back when we just got a new satellite pay phone on the cutter, and it wasn't two weeks before the spooks had notified us that someone was talking about port calls and the ship's schedule... resulting in no more phone calls for the rest of the patrol.

    25. Re:MS & Google by kiskoa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Consider how safe your data is in a Microsoft proprietary format.

      It's the safest! No one ever can read it! ;]

      --
      If Yoda so strong in Force is, why words in right order he cannot put?
    26. Re:MS & Google by funkytwig · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Or alternatively people could do something for the even increasing list of countries America is booming to the ground and then abandoning. Remember Afghanistan, now the media spot-lite is off it both America and the UK have all but abandoned it without for filing there regeneration promises. Its also interesting to see opium poppy production up under the Northmen Alliance, nice to see the War on Drugs going so well.

    27. Re:MS & Google by mlh1996 · · Score: 1

      Dude. Fuck you.

      Ever been away from home for 6+ months with no contact from your friends and family? With people shooting at you, no less? I have. It sucks. Bad.

      I remember waiting in line for hours to make a 5 minute phone call home.

      I remember mail call. When a letter came, it made my week. When one didn't, I was depressed for hours.

      Giving soldiers easy communication home is perhaps the single best thing you can do to keep morale up. Having you're mother say "I love you" on a daily basis is better than more money or better food can possibly be.

      OPSEC be damned. The benefits completely outweigh the risks.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    28. Re:MS & Google by MrResistor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, that's a great idea... if you want to completely destroy morale!

      Most of the soldiers I know are able to get through the day because they feel that they're fighting for something important to them: their friends and family. Take away that connection and you take away their reason for fighting, and suddenly you no longer have an effective fighting force (at best, at worst you create more traitors and the problem, rather than being solved, only gets bigger).

      Before you say they should use snail mail, would you? In a day when near instant communication is not only possible, but common in every home, restricting soldiers to doing things the old way just isn't acceptable. Never mind the fact that snail mail often ends up chasing a soldier around for weeks before finally catching up to them, and it's not uncommon for it to never catch up at all.

      FWIW my soldier friends who're deployed are pretty much restricted to using their .mil addresses, which I'm sure go through some sort of filtering before delivery. No sane military commander would restrict it much more than that except in the most extreme circumstances.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    29. Re:MS & Google by mausmalone · · Score: 1

      Kinda off-topic, but I'm more annoyed by the way links work from Hotmail. For those who don't know, they mangle the URL, and make it pop up in a separate window, inside a frame with a Hotmail banner at the top. If you've been reading the e-mail too long and then click a link, the links have all timed out and the popup script fails. (This almost always happens when I get to the Deep Links at the end of the EFF newsletter.) The kicker is that the popup window titles itself "MSN Hotmail: More Useful Everyday" How is that useful?!?!?!

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    30. Re:MS & Google by DaHat · · Score: 1

      I must remind you that:

      unfair != illegal

      Ex: Life is unfair, does that mean that life is also then illegal?

    31. Re:MS & Google by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      I must remind you that:

      unfair != illegal

      Ex: Life is unfair, does that mean that life is also then illegal?

      Could be. Life is a sexually transmitted disease and it is often spread intentionally.

    32. Re:MS & Google by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Its against the law to interferer with the mail service, because the postal service is a federal entity. Its not against the law to specifically to disrupt UPS or FedEX in the same way. Plenty of other ways to get you for that (trespassing, invasion of privacy, theft, so on and so forth), but not in the same way as for the USPS.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    33. Re:MS & Google by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Sign of the times, I guess.
      Safety/security/whatever. Two aspects.
      What I get to keep.
      What I keep others out of.

      Companies have gone out of business because they couldn't recover their own data.
      Maybe somebody has gone out of business because somebody else could, but I've never heard of it.

    34. Re:MS & Google by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Interesting
      War isn't about being comfortable, the military's primary concern is that we stay alive, not that we have email. They've actually gone to great lengths to set up call centers and email access as it is, but you could easily wait in line for 2 hours for your turn.
      What I find interesting is the assumption among many that since we have the capability to provide instant and continuous worldwide communications between individuals, that creates a right to unlimited acess to that ability. (You see the same assumption pop up in discussions here on slashdot about blocking cell phones in theatres etc..)

      <mode=geezer><veteran=on>At mumble feet under the North Atlantic there isn't room to form a two hour long line, let alone email or phone access to wait on. I envy you kids that, but I didn't have sand in my dinner at least. :) :)

    35. Re:MS & Google by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A third-party analyzed the spam-filter in Outlook 2003. He reverse-engineered the table of weights in the spam-filter engine by matching hashes of a standard English dictionary to values in the file. E-mails containing "Linux" was being marked as spam. I don't know about you, but I haven't gotten much spam pushing Linux porn or Linux enhancement lately. Perhaps the people at MS Outlook Central have a weird fetish?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    36. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I speak for everyone in my head when I say, "Fuck the troops. Fuck them right in the ear. If they weren't so eager to serve, there wouldn't be any wors."

    37. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is not just for American military, but any democratic military, such as Canada or the UK."

      Democratic Military is an oxymoron. You mean "military controlled by a democratic process." Though not sure the UK counts, either.

    38. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinda? Nevermind though, the slashbots will lap it up. I predict a +3 interesting by days end.

    39. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Most soldiers are fighting for a free college education and some medical insurance.

    40. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irregardless of whether money is involved

      Really, "irregardless"? Well, you win.

    41. Re:MS & Google by jschottm · · Score: 1

      -----
      It's against federal laws to interfere with the mail service, so I think someone *could* make a case for companies interfering with email, by extension of that law.
      -----

      And they'd be laughed out of court. Just because something has a similar name doesn't mean it applies. I can't start a gay prostitution company named Hot Male and claim that federal law based on postal mail means that I can't be interfered with. Likewise, I can't start a drug delivery service and call it d-mail and claim that it's similarly protected. If you'd bothered to look at the statute that you're refering to (Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 83, Sec. 1702) you'd see that it spells out exactly what and where it refers to. But then, this is Slashdot, where it's more fun to just spout whatever halfbaked theory comes to mind.

      -----
      What if I saw a package going to your house from my competitor, and I was a Fed-ex agent? Would I be able to simply throw the package out so that you wouldn't use, say, UPS?
      -----

      No, because it's covered by things like larceny and trespassing laws. You know, laws that actually apply.

      -----
      Irregardless
      -----

      Not really a word, FYI.

      -----
      of whether money is involved or any contracts were involved; the act of arbitrary email delivery, to suit corporate needs over the needs of their clients, does transgress the law, one way or another.
      -----

      Um, let me guess, you're not a lawyer are you? Try reading a terms of service some time. MSN TOU Read item nine. Now, cite a legal statute that counteracts it.

      Try admining a real mail server some time. (Something with 50,000+ active users.) Even the most benign services drop connections from known major sources of spam.

    42. Re:MS & Google by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Soldiers away from home should have access to email at all! That they do is a sad commentary on the state of the military.

      I'm assuming you meant to say should not have access. It's interesting because just two days ago I was talking with a former soldier, who is disgusted with today's military. His opinion is that a soldier is Government Property, and that soldiers shouldn't have rights. Otherwise they are not as effective as they could be. It sounds cold, but has a huge ring of good sense.

    43. Re:MS & Google by rozz · · Score: 1
      I just want to say that that is a VERY cool thing to do for the men and women who devote their lives to defending their countries. It's an often thankless job, and being away from loved ones with crappy communications makes it that much harder. Personally I think that the military needs to spend a little bit of cash on forward deployed servers so that things like that aren't needed. ....

      how comes that any post about us soldiers doing their jobs in a place which had no jobs for them is ALWAYS "ontopic" and "insightful" ?

      plus, on top of being -1000 offtopic, this post is plain STUPID - see the military secret response.

      /. moderation works in misterious ways

      P.S. don' forget to moderate me down .. thx

      --
      "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
    44. Re:MS & Google by Pahalial · · Score: 1
      I simply have to say this - that inquirer article is packed with FUD.

      Search Google for Linux Windows That gets you about 14 million pages, even with the English preference or filter turned on. Now, got to msn.com and search the Microsoft way for the same two words. You get exactly 18 pages.


      BULLSHIT. For those too lazy to click the link, here:
      Results 1-15 of about 10382975 containing "linux windows"

      Enough said, methinks? At least try to verify articles prior to quoting them, people.
      --
      Stuff.
    45. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article was written in November of 2003. Its not exactly recent. No way to prove/disprove this now. Still sounds far-fetched, but whatever. Don't like microsoft, don't use their products.

      I don't.

    46. Re:MS & Google by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      Bullshit. Most soldiers are fighting for a free college education and some medical insurance.

      I think a lot of the soldiers are fighting to stay alive.

    47. Re:MS & Google by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      And you know this stuff really does work too! It actually increased my size by 10x! The size of my storage space that is.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    48. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, should that not be http://gmail.google.com/ ?

    49. Re:MS & Google by jotok · · Score: 1

      Would you care to cite your reference re: the Supreme Court case?

      I ask because I remember reading about the New Hampshire state Supreme Court ruling that even stuff you throw away is to remain private (ie the cops are not allowed to go through citizens' garbage).

      Just makes ya wonder.

    50. Re:MS & Google by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      The US Army (and Navy, iirc) already has their own portal with webmail and an IM client that's approved to run on Army networks. Soldiers can get email addresses and accounts for family members by sponsoring them (very easy process). There is also a file storage that has access control mechanisms in place.

      Basically, there's no need for soldiers to get a gmail account for this purpose. Soldier's will have a greater chance of getting access to the Army portal versus a commercial website.

      ---John Holmes...

    51. Re:MS & Google by Kredal · · Score: 1

      gmail.com redirects to gmail.google.com/gmail, so it's ok. (:

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    52. Re:MS & Google by wkitchen · · Score: 1

      Obviously you're joking, but still the possibility of the Gmail invites tripping over a spam filter does not seem too far fetched. For example, if their system looks for patterns such as when a large number of very similar emails are observed in a short period of time, then the Gmail invites might appear very spam-like in their behavior even if their content doesn't look spammish. This is pure speculation, of course. I have no idea if their spam filtering looks for patterns of that nature. But it's conceivable.

    53. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's against federal laws to interfere with the mail service, so I think someone *could* make a case for companies interfering with email, by extension of that law.

      You thought wrong. The government has no control over email services like they do with services such as USPS.

    54. Re:MS & Google by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Well, to clarify, you *do* have a right to such access. That doesn't mean anyone has to provide it for you, however.

      This confusion comes about because most people don't know the difference between a right and a priviledge. A right is something you have that cannot be taken away except by force. A priviledge is something that someone else provides to you.

      For example, you have the right to life. That doesn't mean that the government is going to make sure you live forever, though.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    55. Re:MS & Google by mfh · · Score: 1

      > Irregardless: Not really a word, FYI.

      Actually, it's something called nonstandard english coined early in the 20th century in America. I guess baby's baloney is all balled-up with claptrap, irregardless of the face stretchers who want us to talk all hoity-toity, dip 'n sugar, tip tip tip, sip and stare, above reason.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    56. Re:MS & Google by Random832 · · Score: 1

      you're confusing the common-sense definition of "invitation" with the technical definition as applies to gmail/orkut/livejournal/kuro5hin/etc... the latter are often solicited, and should more correctly be called "access codes" or "signup codes" than "invitations". every gmail user i know (about two of them, but still) has a list of people who have asked them to send invitations when they get some to send out.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    57. Re:MS & Google by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      I just want to say that that is a VERY cool thing to do for the men and women who devote their lives to defending their countries.

      That would be a cool thing for folks that devote thier life to defending ones own country. Problem is, most military folks today have devoted thier lives to invading other countries.

  4. No world record there by Moblaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hotmail is still not as efficient at blocking Gmail as Internet Explorer is efficient at unblocking pop-ups.

  5. Mountains by Jhawkeye83 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mountains out of mole hiles. It's just a spam filter blocking bot mail.

    --
    Quality over Quantity.http://www.virusgaming.com/
    1. Re:Mountains by inkedmn · · Score: 1

      Or long-time email fat cats sensing their impending doom, either one...

      --
      well, it's nothing one behind the ear wouldn't cure
    2. Re:Mountains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      First I think you are right. However Google is at the moment considered a reputible organization and they really are offering a totaly legit service that is exactly what it perports to be in the invites. So its spam or not spam depending on how tight your defininition is. As a mail admin this is not somehting I would deliberatly block as spam and something I would probably flag as clean if it were brought to my attention my filters we killing it. Make no mistake that this is a case of spliting hairs but I imagine M$ is not going to change things for a while with regard to the invites.
      As to blocking e-mails from free sites that is a stupid policy it may help cut down on fraud and spam but it kills allot of legit traffic as well, I use hotmail and I get really pissed when I discover some jackass admin has blocked the entire domain. Hotmail itself a free site blocking google a free site makes no sense at all. That can only be an attempt by M$ to marginalize a competitive service by makeing it inoperable with their services which has many subscribers. They also know google could do the same to them in return by the effect is very small as gmail is new and has few subscribers so the damage to hotmail is very minor if any and probably casues more harm to gmails usablility. I am not just being an M$ hater I completely understand the invites being blocked just not the other mail. This is being anticompetitive.

    3. Re:Mountains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, and as the email fatcats-that-were meet their impending doom, they and their lackeys will go on line in extreme agitation, and lash out! sorry bub, but the world is changing out from under you.

    4. Re:Mountains by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      Not if they are blocking actual emails and not just invites, which the seach engines roundtable link indicates is happening.

      Besides, Yahoo doesn't block invites to its Yahoo Groups service.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    5. Re:Mountains by black+mariah · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      LMFAO. Oh no! You caught me! Gee whiz Beav, I thought we'd get away with it.

      Sincerely,
      Billy G


      Dude, seriously, you're a fucking retard. I'm running Linux right now. I fucking hate Hotmail and don't use it. But you truly need to pull your head out of your idiot ass and realize that COMPANIES WITH FORTY MOTHERFUCKING BILLION DOLLARS DON'T FUCKING DIE. Idiot.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    6. Re:Mountains by noone06 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I do not know if this is the exact case. I tried the test as described with Yahoo. I copied the entire body of the gmail invite and send that to my yahoo account with any subject, and it gets marked as spam. I can delete up to one word in the email, and it does not get marked as spam. It seems Yahoo is specifically looking for the whole body of the Gmail invite..

    7. Re:Mountains by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Insightful
      or, yahoo is specifically looking for the whole body of another email it's looked at too many times.

      it may not be that 'it's gmail invite' but that it's 'identicle to other mail'

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    8. Re:Mountains by adpowers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But not all Gmail invites are the same. Not only are the URLs different and the names listed in the e-mail different, but the first part of the invite is also customizable text from the user sending the invite.

      Andrew

    9. Re:Mountains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or, yahoo is specifically looking for the whole body of another email it's looked at too many times.

      it may not be that 'it's gmail invite' but that it's 'identicle to other mail'


      You may be a financial legend, but you're a spelling fool.

      Today's lesson: Don't be afraid of capitalization, it won't hurt you. Oh, and learn how to structure your sentences.

      Or yahoo is specifically looking for the whole body of another email that it has already seen too many times.

      It may not be that 'it's a gmail invite' but that it's 'identical to other mail'

    10. Re:Mountains by scottj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. I sent an invite to a Yahoo user last week. She contacted me today asking where her invite was. The invitation did contain a custom message from me. When I forwarded a copy of the invite back to her today, it went through just fine. I still haven't gotten a message on my hotmail account that I sent to myself from Gmail. I think the Hotmail block is in effect in full force.

      --
      .-.--
    11. Re:Mountains by way2trivial · · Score: 1
      slashdot- is it a newspaper? or an english class? slashdot, where speelng does not matter

      in this respect, I'm not here for an english lesson, but to discuss ideas, or just keep up with news..

      fwiw i realized I'd botched identical/cle right after I was done, and I don't/didn't care.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    12. Re:Mountains by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      How do you think spam sending software operates? You write a boilerplate message, and it changes a few names, urls and a paragraph or two. So spam filters which look for duplicates have long since learned to look for and remove the "personalisation" elements in those invites.

      For a spam filter, Google invites look like spam, because they uses the same techniques as spam (remember, spam filters don't *understand* what they're filtering - and arguably such invites truly are spam).

  6. I don't want to be nasty, but ... by ezzzD55J · · Score: 5, Funny
    Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another.
    Did anyone expect you to ;) ?
    1. Re:I don't want to be nasty, but ... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, this /. article shows up as a headline on Google News. It's pretty scary when /. stories show up alongside actual professional journalism...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:I don't want to be nasty, but ... by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

      It's pretty scary when /. stories show up alongside actual professional journalism...


      I don't even find it surprising.

      Technically slashdot is "professial journalism" - the slashdot editors get paid after all.
      The process used to create both is very similar, and they're both subject to the same amount of scrutiny before being published.
      But on slashdot, you usually get both sides of the story, (and several sides you didn't even think existed).

      Newspaper stories might be more polished, but I haven't noticed them being any more accurate.

      -- not a .sig

    3. Re:I don't want to be nasty, but ... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Newspaper stories might be more polished, but I haven't noticed them being any more accurate.

      While bashing the journalistic media is a favorite pasttime, Slashdot doesn't even remotely approach journalistic standards in terms of story publishing. Just because the editors get paid doesn't make them professional journalists, they're more like discussion facilitators than anything else.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  7. Dunno about you lot but... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just tested to three hotmail accounts, invites and standard emails get through fine. Not sure about yahoo tho.

    1. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by hottoh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hotmail is how my invite arrived.

      Is the article author positive they do not have one of hotmails spam filters turned on?

    2. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Yep. I sent an invitation to my sister (hotmail) this weekend and it worked fine for her (was in her Inbox). I've also sent out about 2-3 more invitations over the last couple weeks to hotmail addresses and they all got them.

      By the way, I'm not sure what my sister's junk mail settings are set to.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    3. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just received one on Yahoo, straight to the Inbox. Perhaps there's a country-specific issue? They may well use different filters. Or maybe some Bayesian thing where users have different criteria?

    4. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by orin · · Score: 3, Funny

      I tested this also. No problem. Gmail to Hotmail took the same time as my ISP to Hotmail.

      When this story was sitting in the queue, didn't is just sound a bit "too good to be true" (from the conspiracy side of things)?

      Finally - should we be getting a Gmail icon with all of these Gmail stories?

      1. Make Slashdot Joke.
      2. ?????
      3. Get Gmail Invite!!!!

    5. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by hendridm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, this is old news first reported the middle of last week. Perhaps they fixed it now and configured their spam filters to allow the Gmail invite.

    6. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by TheLinuxWarrior · · Score: 2, Funny
      You can send an invite to my yahoo account.

      Purely in the interest of "research" of course. ;)

    7. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I got my invite via my Hotmail account 2 days ago. Took about 10 minutes to get through Hotmails speedy servers.

      So when the hell do I get invites to give out?

    8. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. I set up a Hotmail account just to check this out, and - surprise! - no problems.

      Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another.
      Well, yeah, it wouldn't be too hard to do that, would it now?

    9. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by ideatrack · · Score: 1

      I just invited my brother to gmail by sending it to a Yahoo address and it worked fine.

    10. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1
      Mixed results here... of 3 invites I sent to Hotmail users last week, 1 got through and 2 didn't. Of course the one that got through accepted...

      I am a Yahoo mail user and am annoyed that mail from some of my friends goes to the bulk folder automatically... not invites, but generic email. Maybe Gmail will do better with respect to this... are you getting all this feedback, Google employees? ;)

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    11. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by Jorj+X.+McKie · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Gmail has changed the text of their invitation. Using the text of the message at the link above, I sent three messages (one unchanged, one with a single edit, and one with four edits) to my Yahoo address. All of them ended up in the Bulk folder. Do you have Yahoo's "spamguard" feature turned on?

      I tried from my Gmail address as well. The unchanged message went straight to the Bulk folder. If I deleted a paragraph, it went to the inbox.

      --
      I remember your eyes, on the twelfth of July...
    12. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by blrr · · Score: 0

      invites appeared to work ok but normal emails of mine are being filtered into junk.

    13. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by hal9000 · · Score: 1

      Yahoo still tosses them to the bulk mail folder (as of yesterday).

      --
      Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
    14. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

      Mine doesn't get through to hotmail, but gets through to yahoo.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
  8. Really? by asveepay · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've invited two people on their Hotmail accounts, and both received the emails just fine.

    --
    "I'm not sure which is the bigger disappointment; my failure to formulate a unified field theory, or you."--Stephen Haw
    1. Re:Really? by deadmongrel · · Score: 1

      same here but something has changed now. I sent myself an invitation but still haven't received it. well they might have started to do this after you had sent your friends the invitations. Hotmail hasn't increased their storage space yet so it figures.

    2. Re:Really? by SnoBall · · Score: 1

      I can't really make an opinion on this, primarily because I use a differnt WebMail service. But if anyone would have sent an invite, I would get it.

      --
      Don't eat me ... *looks at nickname* ... okay, eat me.
  9. Microsoft acts anticompetitive... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
    Someone insert the "hello, you must be new here" joke here for me, wouldya?

    The sad thing is that I'm not really surprised... disappointed, perhaps, but not surprised.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Microsoft acts anticompetitive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be suprised. Its all a load of nonsense. Dont let that hold back the MS bashing though.

  10. Honestly... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... if I were a spam filter, I would have seen the gmail email as spam too... I mean LOOK at it.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Honestly... by endx7 · · Score: 1

      Your friend offers to hook you up with a gmail address, so you give them your email address so that they can send an invite.

      How is this spam?

    2. Re:Honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not saying it's spam -- he's saying that to a filter, it's indistinguishable from one of those "Someone has a crush on you!" spams.

    3. Re:Honestly... by endx7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hotmail doesn't think most of the "Someone has a crush on you!" spams are spams anyway.

      The only way you win for that is by turning the "if not in address book it's spam" spam filter on.

  11. A New Era? by illuminata · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another.

    Are the editors finally trying to verify things around here?

    If that's the case, I commend them.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    1. Re:A New Era? by blowdart · · Score: 1

      No, they're really asking for gmail invites to be sent to their "test" hotmail account. Just to check of course ...

    2. Re:A New Era? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's just a new twist to the "Hello, you must be new here" joke.

      Now it is embedded in the submission, refers to the submitter, and goes, "Hello, I must be new here".

      (Translation from "I tried to verify this before posting" implied in the submission text you quoted).

      This is proof that our communal sense of humor is evolving. Woohoo! I for one welcome our...

    3. Re:A New Era? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Are the editors finally trying to verify things around here?

      No, now they're just telling us that they aren't verifying things...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  12. So thats why! by Braingoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    So thats why my G-mail invite never showed up!!

    1. Re:So thats why! by Braingoo · · Score: 1

      umm no I dont need more spam thank you

    2. Re:So thats why! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      roberto at oceanologia.com.br Thanks!

    3. Re:So thats why! by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      ...I was actually going to give you an invite? Nevermind.

    4. Re:So thats why! by Evangelion · · Score: 1

      iwarford@rogers.com

      i've gotten 2200 spam in two weeks, i just don't care anymore....

    5. Re:So thats why! by Evangelion · · Score: 0


      hrm, in retrospect, maybe leaving my naked email address in a mailto: link on slashdot is the reason. i'll have to meditate on that.

    6. Re:So thats why! by borg_cube · · Score: 0

      zack_hutzell@hotmail.com

    7. Re:So thats why! by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      Did I just get marked a troll for actually offering someone something?

      Damn goddamn, what the hell is wrong with moderators these days?

    8. Re:So thats why! by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Troll? Stupid mods.

      He gave me one, so I can attest to the fact that he's not trolling. Maybe offtopic (only slightly) but not trolling.

    9. Re:So thats why! by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      Enjoy.

    10. Re:So thats why! by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

      jpb6220@yahoo.com

      I get about 100 spams/day so i'm not worried...

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    11. Re:So thats why! by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      Thanks! You rock.

    12. Re:So thats why! by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      Enjoy. =)

    13. Re:So thats why! by Winlin · · Score: 1

      lllimbo@yahoo.com
      if you would :) and thanks

    14. Re:So thats why! by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

      odd...nothing came through

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    15. Re:So thats why! by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      I definately invited you. Check your spam?

  13. Well gee, it works fine for me.... by arcite · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got an invite from my buddy, he even sent it to me using his gmail address. me thinks this story is FUD.

    1. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by blowdart · · Score: 5, Informative

      Same here. A gmail invite sent to google arrived quite happily in my inbox, and I have hotmail's spam filter set to high. Test emails sent from my gmail account to hotmail did arrive.

      But hey, lets not let the facts get in way of a knee jerk reaction <g>

    2. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      I've sent a few people invites to their hotmail accounts and they've had no problems recieving them.

    3. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by makomk · · Score: 1
      Same here. A gmail invite sent to google arrived quite happily in my inbox, and I have hotmail's spam filter set to high. Test emails sent from my gmail account to hotmail did arrive.

      If I recall correctly, "High" means that it only lets through mails from addresses you've whitelisted (and MS-generated spam, of course). So I'd be absolutely shocked if they did block the messages...

    4. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by roror · · Score: 1

      I invited my friend in yahoo to gmail .. she signed up without a hint of a problem.

    5. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I got an invite from my buddy, he even sent it to me using his gmail address.

      Is it just me, or does that sentence sound incredibly similar to the ones you hear on those lousy TV oh-this-thing-is-so-good sales?

      "My buddy just bought one... he says it's the best!!"

    6. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by blowdart · · Score: 1
      Actually if we want accuracy the spam filter levels in hotmail are (from the options page)
      1. Default - obvious junk e-mail is caught.
      2. Enhanced - most junk e-mail is caught.
      3. Exclusive - you will only receive e-mail from addresses appearing in your Contacts, service announcements from Hotmail, and messages you have consented to receive from MSN.

      I'm currently set to "enhanced"

    7. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

      Actually, 'High' blocks virtually all (in my experiance) spam, but does not require you to whitelist.
      'Exclusive' filtering only allows emails from whitelisted addys through.

    8. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by stevesliva · · Score: 1

      Well, there are those messages that hotmail blocks from even reaching the user's filter settings-- the user remains happily unaware and less deluged with spam. But messages that Hotmail does not flag as spam through automagical filters would get dropped in "Junk Mail" once reaching a Hotmail account set to exclusive. Gmail's invite to me landed in Junk Mail, but that is, as you said, because my buddy's Gmail address was not yet whitelisted. This article would suggest that Gmail somehow gets filtered out before reaching my account... it does not appear that such happened with my HM account on Friday.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    9. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got mine just yesterday. And a happy new GMail address.

    10. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by DocUi · · Score: 1

      You mean a Slash . article that misses a chance to FUD about Hotmail or Yahoo or any of it's other targets on it's hit list? Say it ain't so!

    11. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by Zirnike · · Score: 1

      A gmail invite sent to my hotmail account got summarily dumped into spam, and my anti-spam settings are on the medium level. It's probably hotmail server based, or something.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
  14. testing 1,2,3 by jdallien · · Score: 3, Informative

    To test, I sent two messages from GMail: one directly to my Hotmail account and one which I only CC'ed to my Hotmail account. The CC'd message arrived immediately but the direct message (sent first) arrived about 5 minutes later.

    1. Re:testing 1,2,3 by periol · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on. Even if you can't RTFA, at least read the blurb. It's not emails from Gmail that aren't getting through, it's *invites*. Every invite I've sent to a yahoo account goes into Bulk Mail. I haven't heard anything about hotmail invites.

    2. Re:testing 1,2,3 by jdallien · · Score: 1

      The headline and text of the blurb here on slashdot says emails AND invites from Gmail weren't getting through. Regardless of the article, that's how it was presented here, so I tested that. Blocking every message from Gmail was more concerning to me than just the invites being lost.

  15. I did receive one by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have an hotmail account, and my cousin was able to send me a Gmail invite to that account a week ago. Perhaps the situation changed, I don't know.

    --
    Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
    1. Re:I did receive one by Fruny · · Score: 1
      Perhaps the situation changed, I don't know.

      Nope, I received one today.

    2. Re:I did receive one by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

      My question becomes: are the ones being routed to Bulk only the ones that just have the stock text in them?

      Certainly when I send out the invites, I actually write a message to someone in it. I haven't invited anyone from Hotmail, though.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  16. Bullshit. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just sent my hotmail account a mail from my gmail account. The message didn't bounce and arrived in my hotmail account just fine.

    So at least hotmail isn't using dirty tactics.

    1. Re:Bullshit. by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      So at least hotmail isn't using dirty tactics.

      For you.
      At the moment.

  17. blocking invites only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just sent a test message from my gmail account to my hotmail address and got it right away.

  18. /dev/null by dimss · · Score: 2, Funny

    It looks like Hotmail staff finelly discovered procmail and /dev/null.

    1. Re:/dev/null by djwavelength · · Score: 1

      ... or after their "upgrade" from BSD to 2000, the recycle bin!

    2. Re:/dev/null by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, just unset HOST because that is more efficient.

  19. Who cares about G-Mail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When am I gonna get my invite to meet G-man?

    That party's been delayed for ages now.

    1. Re:Who cares about G-Mail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When am I gonna get my invite to meet G-man? That party's been delayed for ages now.

      Don't you mean G-spot? I mean, you're posting to Slashdot. Let's be realistic.

  20. Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    i recieved all of mine perfectly, i have no greedy filters set either

    PEBKAC

  21. Hmm, better test my account then by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 1, Funny
    Send an invitation to miko at rescuemission dot net. We need to make sure this problem gets cleared up.

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
    1. Re:Hmm, better test my account then by digitalPortal · · Score: 1

      hmmm better test out my server as well ... tom at digitalportal dot com will post results and statistics as soon as my accoun is activated, thank you much.

  22. got mine by eng69 · · Score: 1

    I just got my invite on saturday and it went into the bulk folder, but I have it specified that way. That night i sent out several emails to people all with hotmail accounts and they all recieved theirs

  23. Breaking the law!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    so they are breaking the law and interfering with email.

    How exactly is filtering incoming e-mail against the law?

  24. Unfortunate legal names by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's possible that the blocking is happening because of some poor sap's unfortunate legal name. He might actually be named "Instant Winner", or "Free Vacation". Crazy hippies.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Unfortunate legal names by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

      or Blanket, or Prince Michael, or Prince Michael 2

      --
      I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
    2. Re:Unfortunate legal names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When i signed up to hotmail, i was unable to use my real last name (which is 'de Groot') because it contained a reserved word. So none of the emails i send with it have my official name as the sender.

      I believe it was blocking the name because it has 'root' as a substring.

    3. Re:Unfortunate legal names by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      > So none of the emails i send with [Hotmail] have my official name as the sender.

      Well to make you feel better, something tells me the other 2 billion Hotmail accounts out there aren't using their official names either. Just ask sk8r_boy34564_2003@hotmail.com and his friend ev4nessen5e_r00lz@hotmail.com.

    4. Re:Unfortunate legal names by pogle · · Score: 1

      I just have to say, that is an awesome sig you have there. I could use that on a t-shirt :)

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    5. Re:Unfortunate legal names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Crazy hippies.

      Please don't be so mean. Some of us didn't have a choice when it comes to our names. Thanks.

      Sincerely, Mr. V-I-A-g-R-a B. C.i.a.l.i.s

    6. Re:Unfortunate legal names by KilobyteKnight · · Score: 1

      I just have to say, that is an awesome sig you have there. I could use that on a t-shirt :)

      Don't be so quick to make that T-shirt. SCO will sue you for violating their IP.

      --
      When will Windows be ready for the desktop?
    7. Re:Unfortunate legal names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When I used to play in the gutter I used to say to the other snipes 'Hello, my name's Baldrick' and they used to say 'Yes, we know. Sod off, Baldrick.'

    8. Re:Unfortunate legal names by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

      Can I get away with charging outrageous prices for mildly clever badly printed material? If so, I'll go grab the iron on transfer paper... I think some geeky company does that already though...

      --
      I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
    9. Re:Unfortunate legal names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or Philip Edward Nis or somesuch
      p.e.nis

    10. Re:Unfortunate legal names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly the same thing, but close enough ;) http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/generic/6a20/

    11. Re:Unfortunate legal names by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.

      This has got to be the most intelligent/funny thing I've seen on /. in weeks.

  25. Been there, done that by Horizon_99 · · Score: 1

    Had some problems sending to hotmail for a few hours last week but that's about it. I guess it's just hotmails spam filters trying to adapt to a new email domain sending thousands of email to its customers.

    Growing pains are to be expected.

  26. Well.. hold on... by Mz6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After reading most of these links (I know.. I actually RTFA), these blogs and other articles were posted months ago (back in April!). Perhaps they have since changed their ways after numerous postings about it?

    --
    Hmmm.
  27. Is this something new? by jrand · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I invited someone with a hotmail address about a week ago, and they accepted with no problem. So unless they've suddenly changed their policy after the first several thousand invites went out, this is an isolated email problem reported on one person's weblog. Spam filters moving the invite into a bulk mail folder is to be expected - it is an automatically generated email sent out in bulk, after all.

  28. Blog crap by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 5, Informative

    So the core of this Slashdot "article" is some posting on one guy's blog about losing a invitation he sent to his girlfriend. And that's been extrapolated into "Hotmail blocks Gmail".

    If you read the blog article the writer blows all credibility when he reveals that someone just told him about the "Sent Folder":

    Update: Thanks to everyone telling me to check the Sent folder. I can at least retrieve the invites now.

    When are people going to realize that blogs are the equivalent of public urination on the web. People post stream of consciousness bullshit dressed up as "information" or even "facts" and because it's on a blog, well then, it must be true.

    John.

    1. Re:Blog crap by black+mariah · · Score: 4, Funny
      blogs are the equivalent of public urination on the web
      You've managed to put into words the things I've been feeling for years. *sniff* I love you, man! *CRIES*
      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    2. Re:Blog crap by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2, Funny

      When are people going to realize that blogs are the equivalent of public urination on the web.

      That would explain the spotty coverage.

    3. Re:Blog crap by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I live in New York, we get to see public urination every day :-) So spotting blogs wasn't hard!

      John.

    4. Re:Blog crap by Tom7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your mistake is believing that Slashdot posting the story somehow elevates its fact status. If blogs are public urination, Slashdot is public urination from a big, incontinent man with polyuria.

    5. Re:Blog crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "-- 640k ought to be enough for anybody. -- Bill Gates"

      I'm curious about you including this in your signature. You know, or should know, that he never said that and that quote has been widely debunked. Why do you try to continue its legacy?

    6. Re:Blog crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, from the site now:

      Update update: You know, this is really getting blown out of proportion. I sent a few invites to Hotmail; they were bounced. I asked if anyone else had the same problems, a few people had, but most people said they could send to Hotmail just fine. The big story? There isn't one, as far as I can tell. If Hotmail is blocking Gmail invites, they aren't doing it on a widespread basis.

      Another nonstory.

    7. Re:Blog crap by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      I'm curious about you including this in your signature. You know, or should know, that he never said that and that quote has been widely debunked. Why do you try to continue its legacy?

      The quote went on far too long unchallenged for it to be debunked. If Gates says he didn't say it, do you really believe him? Who can prove it either way?
      I made it my sig because I think it's funny. Plus, it gets Microsoftie's all in a huff.

    8. Re:Blog crap by geekboy2k · · Score: 1

      Umm, No.

      The only problem with blogs is that people THINK that they are factual without any research. Same as every other newspaper / magazine / television / radio / etc. People think because it's "on the Internet" it has some kind of credibility.

      Same as postings on Slashdot - including this one 8*)

    9. Re:Blog crap by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      There are some good blogs though. To simply dismiss all blogs is a tad much. I like Belmont Club, for example.

    10. Re:Blog crap by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't think you have that quite right, you're mixing metaphors. If blogs are public urination, slashdot is the place in which they piss.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Blog crap by c64k · · Score: 1

      This holds true if you replace 'blogs' with 'slashdot comments.'

      Little on the web should be taken without a hefty amount of skepticism, be it blog, slashdot, or cnn.

      That people believe a blog is factual, true, or newsworthy says little about the blog and a lot about the people.

      --
      CIA Industries - Running the world for fun and profit
    12. Re:Blog crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the same reason people keep continuing the "Al Gore invented the internet" smear invented by the republicans

    13. Re:Blog crap by abertoll · · Score: 1

      When are people going to realize that blogs are the equivalent of public urination on the web. People post stream of consciousness bullshit dressed up as "information" or even "facts" and because it's on a blog, well then, it must be true.

      Personally, I think you are being WAY too kind to the blog phenomenon.

      --
      "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
    14. Re:Blog crap by Stauf · · Score: 1

      GMail invites aren't sent as normal email are - you enter some detail in a form and it sends the invite - it's so unlike composing normal email that it's perfectly understandable that you wouldn't think that a copy of the invitation would end up in your 'Sent Mail' folder.

    15. Re:Blog crap by nathanh · · Score: 1
      When are people going to realize that blogs are the equivalent of public urination on the web.

      Damn. That's the best description of blogs I've ever read.

      That one needs to go into the fortune file.

  29. Maybe, maybe not by cemaco · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not that I would put it beyond Microsoft to block a competitor, but if you RTFA you see that a possible reason for the invites being bounced is that they are being picked up by the spam filters.

    http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/is-hotmail-block in g-gmail-invitations-015942.php

    1. Re:Maybe, maybe not by oPless · · Score: 1

      Just sent a email to my hotmail account (from gmail), it went straight into the junk mail folder.

  30. OMG CENSORSHIP! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry but this came right out the box of Microsoft's dirty tricks. If you can't get your e-mail then you can't switch services, microsoft already has to deal with Linux, why not shut out Gmail while we're at it? At least this time it won't cost a small company millions because Microsoft didn't like them. I just wonder how many people will sue when they lose money through Ebay when buying one and it never arriving.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:OMG CENSORSHIP! by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Sit very still and slowly turn around. The Microsoft gremlins are monitoring you right now!

      The only protection from their mind-control rays is a tinfoil hat. Get one while you still can!

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    2. Re:OMG CENSORSHIP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gah! Havent you read any of the hundreds of replies saying gmail is getting through OK? Of course you haven't - if no-one RTFA's they are hardly going to RTFC.
      This place is the worst advert for F/OSS I have ever seen....

    3. Re:OMG CENSORSHIP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would guess.. zero? What kind of insane fuck thinks a spam-filtered Gmail request in your Hotmail account is grounds for a lawsuit? OMG, you mean that "You Get What You Pay For" crap is true?!

      Jesus, even without apologizing for MS, do you think maybe a bunch of messages that are 95% identical, that have started coming through the system lately *may be tagged as spam*?

  31. My Gmail invite got put into my spam folder... by Phil+John · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...by spam bayes outlook plugin, almost missed the three week window too, so yeah, it does look very spammy.

    --
    I am NaN
    1. Re:My Gmail invite got put into my spam folder... by Conroy · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean anything without knowing how well your spambayes has been trained. Spambayes filtering depends completely on each user...

      I haven't had any legitimate mail (including my gmail invite) put into my spam folder by spambayes ever since the first couple weeks I used it.

      (My spambayes currently has 1057 good and 1061 spam in its database)

    2. Re:My Gmail invite got put into my spam folder... by verbatim_verbose · · Score: 1

      That's not that surprising, really. The only difference between the Gmail invite and lots of other spam is that you actually solicited this one.

  32. Hogwash by RestiffBard · · Score: 1, Informative

    I just sent an invite to my niece last night. Went through fine. Put away the tinfoil.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  33. Article not accurate by Slowtreme · · Score: 1

    I Concur with parent. My hotmail account accepted a Gmail invite not more than 20 min ago. I had no issues, other than Gmail being down/slow, probably being slashdotted...

    Richard

    --
    Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. Please note: I've not been able to verify this one by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or in other words, you are practicing the old time honoured passtime of spreading a rumour.

    Great work.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  36. Worked for me... by Otto · · Score: 1

    As recently as last week. I got a g-mail invite to my hotmail account, signed up, and am now using gmail. Works fine.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  37. Take off your tinfoil hats by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's already well-documented that Yahoo moves Gmail invites into the Bulk Mail folder. I've personally confirmed the Hotmail and Yahoo blocking.

    Much as I enjoy wearing my tinfoil hat, I think it can be dispensed with here.

    Both Hotmail and Yahoo mail have been plagued with spam, and with users demanding they do something about that spam. Indeed, that's one reason people are interested in GMail.

    Since almost all spam -- anything we think of spam, anyway -- arrives in mass quantities, and a logical way to reduce spam is simply to look for many addresses receiving the same email.

    So a decent first cut at filtering bulk spam (and recall that both Yahoo and Hotmail use "bulk mail" folders) would be to take an MD5 sum of each email (not including the "To" address header lines, of course), stick the sum in hash table or other database, and increment a counter for each email with that MD5 sum. Once the counter reached some arbitrary large-ish number, you'd mark all copies of that emails spam.

    Since the GMial invite varies slightly, it's clear that something fuzzier than an MD5 sum is being used, but the principle remains the same.

    The first N GMail invites weren't marked as "bulk email"; after the counter threshold was reached, all the rest have been.

    So all we've learned from this is that, even during this invite-only beta test, GMail must be sending out a hell of a lot of invites, and that, yes indeed, Hotmail and Yahoo customers demanded and got "bulk email" filtering.

    So take off the tinfoil hats -- you'll have a real reason to wear them soon enough.

    1. Re:Take off your tinfoil hats by sonpal · · Score: 1
      So a decent first cut at filtering bulk spam (and recall that both Yahoo and Hotmail use "bulk mail" folders) would be to take an MD5 sum of each email (not including the "To" address header lines, of course), stick the sum in hash table or other database, and increment a counter for each email with that MD5 sum. Once the counter reached some arbitrary large-ish number, you'd mark all copies of that emails spam.

      You are already two steps behind the spammers. Have you not received e-mails where the text of the message contains a number or a random-ish looking string in the e-mail text that is out of place? The string or number is different for every e-mail that is sent.

      These days what you need to combat spam is a content analyzer, which is not nowhere near as easy to implement as a md5sum.

    2. Re:Take off your tinfoil hats by nharmon · · Score: 1

      An MD5sum wouldn't work for spam either because they are constantly putting random numbers at the bottom.

    3. Re:Take off your tinfoil hats by illumin8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Since almost all spam -- anything we think of spam, anyway -- arrives in mass quantities, and a logical way to reduce spam is simply to look for many addresses receiving the same email.

      This is true. But, what probably triggered it was this: A few users received Gmail invites and either didn't know what it was, or didn't recognize the person they received it from, saw it was offering another email service, then clicked the button that says "This is Spam". When Hotmail gets a few reports like that the message text gets added to their filters and everyone else's invites start going to the Spam folder.

      That's just standard operating procedure. If they didn't have that procedure in place we'd receive 50-100 spams a day in our Hotmail box.

      Of course, none of this would have been a problem if Hotmail hadn't sold all of their account lists to bulk emailers years ago. Hotmail is the only service that when I first created an account, instantly started sending me spam before I had even given my address out to anyone. The only way they could have gotten my address is if Hotmail sold it to bulk senders.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    4. Re:Take off your tinfoil hats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      a lot of spammers just try random addresses at a domain. We had one that would try a@, b@,c@...aaaaaaa@,bbbbbbbb@,cccccccc@, etc. Our server was smart enough to reply back as everything invalid after the same IP started connecting and trying the addresses constantly, but also, some try just common jsmith@domain.tld and bob123@this.com, etc to harvest addresses.

      So they may not have sold your e-mail address.

    5. Re:Take off your tinfoil hats by tigris · · Score: 1

      GMail must be sending out a hell of a lot of invites
      You got that right. In the space of one week, I've received 36 opportunities to invite a new user, and that's after using Gmail for one month and not getting any. Looks like they've entered a new phase of the beta.

    6. Re:Take off your tinfoil hats by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      Then find the dictionary words in the e-mail, and include *only* them calculating the hash.

    7. Re:Take off your tinfoil hats by levity+island · · Score: 1

      So all we've learned from this is that, even during this invite-only beta test, GMail must be sending out a hell of a lot of invites

      Surely I'm not the only person who has had this thought: Why couldn't Gmail just stay invite-only? It's not like being invite-only drastically limits their opportunities for growth. On the contrary, they get to control the growth of their userbase, and if they want a huge influx of users, all they have to do is give away more invites. They've given me thirteen to give away, for example.

      It's also smart because it makes Gmail just a little bit more exclusive. They get to optimize their supply/demand balance, and services like gmailswap help spread the invites around.

  38. my hotmail/gmail experiences by quintesson · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had an invite sent to my Hotmail address yesterday, and it arrived safely in my inbox within seconds. However, a message I sent from my Gmail account to somebody else's Hotmail went into their 'Junk Mail' folder.

    Either way, I'm sure Microsoft will rectify this situation, or risk losing customers.

    1. Re:my hotmail/gmail experiences by RobertTaylor · · Score: 1

      >Either way, I'm sure Microsoft will rectify this situation, or risk losing customers.

      Yes, as allowing invites to a competing service is a solid way of ensuring customer retention.

      Rob.

    2. Re:my hotmail/gmail experiences by quintesson · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has shown a willingness (albeit a somewhat reluctant one) to allow interoperability with third-party clients using the MSN protocol (Gaim, Trillian, etc.), and as more and more people starting using GMail, there will be greater demand from existing Hotmail subscribers to ensure that the service remains useful.

  39. Riddler by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Mr. Brin is becoming Mr. BrinNigma, or the Riddler. I can imagine him sitting in a huge throne, with GOOGLE carved into the throne's back and a stream of green binary data flowing from a CISCO switch right into his head, while Serge is laughing demonically. After all, information is what makes one powerfull.

    Maybe M$ sees itself as a Batman of some sort ;)

  40. BS by op00to · · Score: 1

    Nothing like a little /. FUD, eh?

    Just sent emails from gmail to Yahoo and gmail to Hotmail, both went through almost immediately.

    Next!

  41. 2 month correspondence by zpiderz · · Score: 1

    I've been corresponding through my gmail account with a distant friend who has a hotmail address for about 2 months. He has had no trouble receiving any of my e-mails. The submitter's situation, however, seems legitimate.

  42. Just tested it out... by fr0z · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ...and it worked perfectly. I was able to get the invite in my Hotmail Inbox. So unless there are people with differing experiences, I'd say this is an over-reaction :)

    --
    Never underestimate the predictability of human stupidity...
  43. I don't know about everyone else... by gilxa1226 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    but it worked just fine for me today.

    btw this:
    You are currently using 0 MB (0%) of your 1000 MB.

    is a lot nicer to see than 10% used in hotmail for 6 e-mails, none of which are html or have pics.

  44. Can anyone login to gmail currently? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone login to gmail currently? I got my invite in hotmail this morning, signed up, but gmail keeps saying: " Gmail is temporarily unavailable. Cross your fingers and try again in a few minutes. We're sorry for the inconvenience."

    Sucks :(

  45. They don't do even these things right now X-( by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

    What's happening to Microsoft? Where is its aggressiveness going?

    I am disappointed that MS is not doing even this one properly. I just copy pasted the link from a second gmail invitation that I received and sent to my brother's hotmail account and he received it just fine

    A gmail invitation mail would include a link that'd be like
    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-1a2b3c4d5e-1 a2b3c4 d5e
    (No this one wouldn't work unless I am god or you are)
    Till /gmail/ it would be common; then a character (I have seen only 'a's till now), followed by a '-', then 10 characters and then again a '-' and 10 characters

    Damn!!! Is it that difficult to search for such a pattern in a mail and hijack it??

    I am disappointed MS, I am seriously disappointed

    (Opera or GMail!?! I cho(o)se Opera)

  46. your own SMTP server? ha! by kalpol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I tried that. Yes, I have my own SMTP server. It was nice, fast, and super reliable until AOL/Comcast/Time Warner/pretty much everyone began blocking email from everyone except megacorp SMTP servers.

    --
    12:50 - press return.
    1. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      That's all for the best. You don't want to be accussed of knowing anyone who is on AOL do you? AOL and possibly Yahoo (I forget now) do this to my outgoing emails but I just tell people that unless they get an email account that is not lame they can't email me and expect a reply. Honestly, your ISP's all offer multiple email accounts now. Why are people still using this Hotmail/Yahoo/AOL rubbish, unless they are their ISP...and then I just pity them ;->

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    2. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with sending email to AOL from our non-megacorp servers. Of course, we've never sent stuff to AOL that was classified as "bulk email", and we have taken a few moments to incorporate Sender Policy Framework records into our DNS, in keeping with AOL's stated policy on SPF and "whitelisting", so your mileage may vary.

    3. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, my ISP is provided to my apartment through the complex. They pay for the network through our rent money. No additional services are offered through the ISP (usenet, email, etc) Which means I am left with my "lame" yahoo account, as are many people whose only means of access are a public library.

      Then again I guess the high horse is a better place to look down on people, isn't it?

    4. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      Well, Yahoo and Hotmail have been the Internet equivalent to what has been tried in two different ways with phone service. The "number for life" wasn' that the 700 numbers which no one bought into and the new cell phone change where you can keep and pass your number from cellphone provider to the next.

      In my own case my ISP has changed at least 3 times when I was in dialup and at least 3 time my cable service has changed hands with cooresponding changes in mail service and address. Cablevision to ATT to Comcast.

      If you want an address that people know about, that does not change, that is available anywhere, then those free services provide that. That one service, of continuity, has its own value. So don't pity the smart people. Pity all your friends that you did not message that your email address changed so they can never find you again.

    5. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by Astatine · · Score: 1

      You can always run your own SMTP server, and have it route mail via your ISP's one for those receivers who automatically drop SMTP from random addresses assuming it's spam. That's what I do. :)

    6. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by soren42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had this same problem. The solution is to use your ISP's SMTP server as a relay host. For example, in my Postfix main.cf, I have the line:

      relayhost = smtp-server.carolina.rr.com

      That fixed my problems not being able to send to AOL, Time Warner, the Easter Bunny, and the Jehovah's Witnesses.

      And, with SquirrelMail (or any other free software webmail system) set up, I can check my mail from anywhere with a web browser.

      It beats using Hotmail any day of the week.

      --

      "Adventure? Excitement? A Jedi craves not these things."
    7. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run my own SMTP server at home, and I have zero problem with ISPs blocking my mail, even though I deliver directly. I use Speakeasy DSL, host my own DNS and have Speakeasy set the in-addr.arpa reverse lookups to point back into my own domain. Speakeasy also does not list my static addresses in public dialup/dynamic address lists that many ISPs use to block spam from zombie Windows machines. So it *is* possible to host your own mail server, but it may be more complicated than, say, simply starting up an MTA on your system and setting up an MX and CNAME for your address in some domain.

    8. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by Jayfar · · Score: 1

      Really? I've had my own smtp for 3 years and have yet to have a single mail bounced by anyone, including aol (where I correspond with one user quite frequently). Of course it helps to have a provider that will map your rDNS to your mail server's hostname. That's a major difference between comcast and a real ISP.

    9. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Honestly, your ISP's all offer multiple email accounts now

      That is the second time I have read that kind of statement in the last few minutes. First of all it is not true (my ISP only procides connectivity), and secondly why would anyone want to rely on one company for everything? If that company goes, so does every part of your internet "experience" - mail, web hosting, news, ...

    10. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is becoming increasingly common to block direct smtp from dynamic IPs, simply because some of those deliver spam.

    11. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1
      Since all mail clients have an address book facility there is absolutely no excuse for forgetting to mail a friend about your new mail address. This argument is simply a straw man these days.

      e.g.

      Email sent to entire address book.

      ???

      Profit!

      Do you seriously think Hotmail will still be around by the end of your lifetime?

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    12. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      Do you seriously think Hotmail will still be around by the end of your lifetime?


      Probably not, but Yahoo outlasted several "real" ISP addys.
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    13. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

      So get a domain name and use a service like zoneedit.com to have anything@example.com forwarded to whatever your current account is. Hand out the @example.com address to anyone who needs to message you, set it as the reply-to on your emails, etc. When your ISP or employer changes, just sign into zoneedit and have your @example.com address changed to point at your new address. No need to tell anybody of the change, they can keep emailing you as before.

    14. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by WryCoder · · Score: 1

      I have comcast and they do provide proper rDNS. That doesn't stop sourceforge (or AOL) from blocking my direct SMTP anyway. I've been forced to set up a remotely hosted server, since I really don't want to use comcast outbound (they lose email and don't deliver bounces).

    15. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      Yes but,

      My hotmail account is not just known to the people in my address book. A number of vendors and business contacts that I want to hear from have been given that address.

      The empirical evidence I presented about the stability of that address over my lifetime so far versus the other ISP emails I have had says it is way more stable. I think that stability of ability to contact is a useful thing if you want to be found. Otherwise it is just a royal pain.

    16. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      That certainly is one approach.

      But lets see, to get my own domain address, at least $75, to have someone host it, more bucks. To set up the forwarding.. and maintain it, several steps you have to remember to do for the rest of your life.

      If you have the money and the time, this is certainly a more time and more money trade off to a free stable service.

    17. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      I solved the problem the easy and reliable way. I just registered my own domain and set up my own SMTP server. I control the domain so it can never change, and I can have any and every email address I like. I got a fixed IP from my ISP (Bulldog, excellent service if you're in London) and set up a DNS entry to point to my home machine. Voila, an email address that I can guarantee will always be hosted the way I want it to be. Granted, this is way too much work for the average Joe, but it is ideal for techies.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    18. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      Good job.. There is still that pesky domain name registration fee but, looks like a good way to go.

    19. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by cybe · · Score: 1


      > I tried that. Yes, I have my own SMTP server. It was nice, fast, and super reliable
      > until AOL/Comcast/Time Warner/pretty much everyone began blocking email
      > from everyone except megacorp SMTP servers.


      Enter the Personal Co-location Registry.

    20. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where are you looking at domain prices. if i spent 75 i would have paid around 5yrs worth of .com domian registration. Second you dont need to even host a site to have free email forwarding from zoneedit.com and setting up the forwarding takes about as much effort as logging into hotmail or yahoo (i just tried this took me less then 1 min).

    21. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by Captain_Jackass · · Score: 1

      But lets see, to get my own domain address, at least $75[...]
      You need to stop shopping in 1998. Prices have gone down since then.

    22. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      There used to be a time when 'properly configured' for an email server meant it would accept, and relay, email. Then times changed, and the definition was changed to 'accept for my domain and NOT relay for anybody'. Times changed farther, and now it means 'Accept for my domain, not relay for anybody, has published SPF records, and has reverse dns on the ip'.

      I'm not part of a megacorp, I have a properly configured email server, have no problem in/outbound to/from anywhere.

      You likely got blocked because you didn't properly set up your reverse dns, or because you are on a dynamically assigned netblock, possibly with port 25 blocking in place. All of those would construe an 'improperly configured email server' by today's definitions.

  47. jumping the gun on MS bashing by tracon5 · · Score: 1

    yeah someone might want to check a few more facts before they make blind statments like this. seems to me like someone wanted to bash MS alittle more with out actualy bothering to see if it was true or check there email again or wait 20 minutes.

    Its not that i actualy like MS its just the actual truth.

    I got my invite just fine and so did my brother.
    both of us got the invites through hotmail.

    --
    Non-smokers die every day --Bill Hicks
  48. Gmail invite by Dracolytch · · Score: 4, Informative

    A Gmail invite came to my Yahoo account just fine.

    Just so y'all know: I used http://www.gmailswap.com to get the invite. Thanks guys!

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    1. Re:Gmail invite by ryanw · · Score: 1

      how about an invite?

      invite at nhorizon dot net

    2. Re:Gmail invite by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't have any yet. Just been with them for a day or two. That's why I recommended the link in my original post.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    3. Re:Gmail invite by ryanw · · Score: 1

      That link has been slashdotted. Seriously, there's like thousands of requests now for gmail accounts.

  49. not the first time by phreakv6 · · Score: 0

    This is not the first time Micro$oft does something stupid to counter competetors.Search for XFree86 in msn search used to result in pr0n links.

    --
    fifteen jugglers, five believers
    1. Re:not the first time by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Interesting...no mention of Yahoo in your post. Biased?

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    2. Re:not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oooh oooh Micro$oft. U r s0 1eet!

  50. Email wars, probably predictable by sammyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Very funny in a warped sort of way. If email begins to fail regularly, this may be the straw that brings in full goverment regulation and all the blessings and other stuff that entails...

    Remember at the dawn of the electrical age there were competing companies with many different voltages, made for exciting interoperability issues. Goverment regulation could be a blessing.

    1. Re:Email wars, probably predictable by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Goverment regulation could be a blessing.

      Which government tho? And if all the governments have different regulations ...

      Could be ugly(er)!

    2. Re:Email wars, probably predictable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remember at the dawn of the electrical age there were competing companies with many different voltages, made for exciting interoperability issues. Goverment regulation could be a blessing.



      You seem to be confusing Government regulation with standardization -- Governments need not be involved.

    3. Re:Email wars, probably predictable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Email wars? No need to put on that tinfoil hat just yet.

      Government regulation could be a blessing.. yeah right. There is no reason to regulate email.

  51. Outblaze by Phoinix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Other companies as Outblaze have similar practices. Recently, all emails from the un.org servers were BLOCKED. Outblaze claim that the sysadmin @ un.org blocked their servers for spam or other stuff (viruses, etc) and did not respond to their emails. What Outblaze did is the most stupid thing ever. I will not be renewing my subscription with them (www.operamail.com).
    I may nderstand if they decided to block an ISP server, but blocking servers of the United Nations is just MORONIC; I doubt this happens outside the US.

    Has anyone encountered similar stupid acts?

    1. Re:Outblaze by Zapdos · · Score: 1

      What is stupid about it? The UN.org servers should be treated the same way as any other net server. The political affiliations of the group who owns the server does not grant that server special status.

    2. Re:Outblaze by haluness · · Score: 1

      > I doubt this happens outside the US.

      Outblaze is located in Hong Kong

    3. Re:Outblaze by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      "Has anyone encountered similar stupid acts?"

      Yeah, accusing a Hong Kong based ISP of being in the US because it blocks un.org.

    4. Re:Outblaze by Phoinix · · Score: 1

      The fact that they blocked an entire domain for an unjustified reason is wrong. The fact that UN.ORG sysadmin did not remove them from their black list does not mean that they can block the un.org domain. It is not the political affiliation which is significant. It is the fact that a webmail has blocked a major international organization for unjustified reasons. It is the fault of outblaze that their servers were blocked and not UN.ORG In this case, Outblaze is deliberately prventing legitimate email from arriving to my email box. I paid for their services. I expect them to do a decent job and not to block emails coming to my inbox. The fact that they chose to do that with the servers of an organization as the UN makes this worse.

    5. Re:Outblaze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be a us company trying to avoid taxes

  52. Yep. It's true. by cherrycoke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bought a dirt-cheap account on Ebay on Saturday; the seller sent the link to my Hotmail account, and it never appeared in the inbox or the trash.

    Had him send it to my main email address after reading this article, and the link worked fine. Needless to say, I'll be ditching Hotmail within 24 hours. This makes me incredibly angry.

    --
    http://www.farmerbob.org
    1. Re:Yep. It's true. by randyest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm, yours is the only post I saw (I'm reading at +1) supporting the rumor. Yet I count 12 posts above yours claiming that invites made it to Hotmail (and the desired user) without problem. One of the 12 said the invite went to bulk mail due to the spam filter, but it didn't "disappear into the ether." All others claim that both emails from gmail accounts and invites were not blocked, lost, torn, mutilated, or otherwise hindered by Hotmail.

      So, that's interesting. Was it only the invite that was "lost" or regular emails from gmail users too?

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Yep. It's true. by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Funny
      Needless to say, I'll be ditching Hotmail within 24 hours. This makes me incredibly angry.

      HULK SMASH PUNY HOTMAIL ACCOUNT!!
      RAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!

      whatever...

    3. Re:Yep. It's true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bought a dirt-cheap account on Ebay on Saturday

      Moron.

    4. Re:Yep. It's true. by khallow · · Score: 1

      This makes sense. My gmail invite "never arrived", but at the time I deleted all spam from my Hotmail account and I had the "enhanced" level of spam filtering. This story just became a non-story.

    5. Re:Yep. It's true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, it's still a "SEMI-STORY". People are confirming that invites goto the junk mail folder. I would imagine an invite from a friend isn't bulk mail or junk mail, but I dunno.. maybe. It's a grey area.

    6. Re:Yep. It's true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bought a dirt-cheap account on Ebay on Saturday; the seller sent the link to my Hotmail account, and it never appeared in the inbox or the trash.

      You think this might have been because other users of the Hotmail service were considering Gmail offers to be Junk Mail, and clicking on the "This is Junk Mail" (or whatever it is called) link? That is why they have the different levels of Junk Email protection, and I'm sure yours is set to Enhanced or something, which will catch "most" junk email. But most of these companies tell you to check the Junk Email folder occasionally when you have it on the high level of protection anyways.

      The Gmail block was not necessarily done directly by Hotmail.

  53. Best Quote by GuyinVA · · Score: 1

    "All I know is that when it comes to free email services, sometimes you get what you pay for"
    Hmmm, if I send that e-mail message body to my dad's pay MSN account, it goes thru...

  54. Re:MS & Google (and Quicktime and DR-DOS...) by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Microsoft has a long and rich history of crippling opposition products. Quicktime for Windows was flakey as hell in the early years, but far from that being Apple's fault it was alleged (convincingly) that Microsoft were deliberately making it unstable. DR-DOS is the subject of a long running lawsuit where it appears that some versions of Windows 3.x simply refused to install on it for no good reason and providing only confusing errors.

    However, I will not attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity. Hotmail has been so unreliable of late that at work we're close to the point where Hotmail addresses will not be accepted as a primary email address. Incredibly stupid filters tend to be at the root of the problems. If too many messages look the same Hotmail calls them spam and they vanish into a black hole. Meanwhile, actual spam fills many a Hotmail inbox.

  55. I have both a gmail and a yahoo... by Dagny+Taggert · · Score: 2, Informative

    account and I am able to forward back and forth without problems. I'd like to see some independent verification of this.

    --
    Don't be a looter...and yes, I know that it's spelled with an "A" instead of an "E".
  56. hotmail auto blocked xbox modchip store for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I had the same thing happen to me when i ordered my modchip for my xbox a year ago. I had it send the confirmation email to my hotmail account (my mistake) which hotmail auto blocked.. I ended up trouble shooting this with their tech support and the only way i was able to recieve email from that domain was if i put their domain in the whitelist.

  57. Not my experience. by EvilJohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I invited a friend to my gmail account, sending the invite to her hotmail account. It worked perfectly.

    --

    Less Talk, More Beer.
  58. Hotmail/Yahoo Jealous ! by sbeashwar · · Score: 1

    I have had not one but three instances where gmail invites directly landed in the junk folder. The competition is killing ! both the giants, if Gmail sticks to its stand; it is likely to doom all other email providers.

  59. Never mind hotmail, look at the ISPs by jdowland · · Score: 1

    Hotmail tagging the invites as junk may just be an accident. What about ISPs purposefully blocking all mail from gmail accounts? Nobody here seems to be focusing on that. This seems a much more serious problem.

    From the forum mentioned:

    "Thank you for contacting us. Unfortunately, due to potential privacy and confidentiallity considerations, we are not accepting inbound email from Google's Gmail service. In order for us to respond to your email, you will need to resend it from a different email account."

    But what business of the ISPs is it if I choose to submit to the terms and conditions?

  60. Can you please send by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

    an invitation to
    ieshan@gmail.com !?

    Thanks in advance

    1. Re:Can you please send by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anybody send you a gmail invite to your gmail account you greedy bastard.

    2. Re:Can you please send by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

      May I request the coward to look at the email address of the super parent!?!?


      by Ieshan (409693) ieshan@ g m a i l . c om on 18:59 21st June, 2004 (#9483443)
      ( http://flashbulb.webutronics.com/?sn=slashdot | Last Journal: 22:27 14th April, 2004 )

      Want one? Leave your email. =)

      Ieshan


      Damn even ACs are getting stupid these days.
      Ok i'll let you compensate for your stupidity. Now post your email address and credit card number with the expiry date here

      (Karma be damned; I am no better than an AC anyway)

    3. Re:Can you please send by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      Seriously mate? I just gave out three invites to folks who replied. What gives?

  61. I will test it if you send the invite by Linuxathome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quick, someone send me a gmail invite to my email at : gmailme ATT linuxathome DOTT c o m. I'll forward it to my yahoo and hotmail account and will post the results here. Okay, okay, this is a desperate attempt to get a gmail invite, but it's worth a try right?

    1. Re:I will test it if you send the invite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sent you an invite, have too many to give away. I have 5 more if anyone wants one. patrickoneal at gmail dot com

  62. Worked for me by sgarrity · · Score: 1

    I tried an invite from Gmail to Hotmail and it came through fine for me.

  63. Yahoo by kermit6306 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I don't know about all this. My GMail invite when stright to my Yahoo! inbox last night.

    1. Re:Yahoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto for me - invite sent to a yahoo.co.uk address worked fine.

      Why is this even news? So GMail invites look like unsolicited mail, what's the big deal? Hotmail and Yahoo aren't intentionally blocking the invites, it's just a function of the form the invite takes. *shrug*

      --cfmd

  64. Um, I worked for me, i dont know about the rest of by dangermurphy · · Score: 1

    you...

    My buddy just sent me an invite on friday, and I quickly notified everybody on my hotmail contact list that I was switching over to gmail. I think i even included a little slam against microsoft in the mail. But i see no evidence of blocking invites. Below is a quick copy and paste from my hotmail account

    From : XXXXXXX
    Sent : Friday, June 18, 2004 3:37 PM
    To : Ben Murphy
    Subject : Ben, Piyush Patel has invited you to open a Google mail account

    | | Trash Can | Inbox

    I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out. Here's
    an invitation to create an account.

    Biatch

    XXXXXX has invited you to open a free Google Gmail account. The
    invitation will expire in three weeks and can only be used to set up one
    account.

    To accept this invitation and register for your account, visit

    you dont need the rest...

  65. Not True. by pilot1 · · Score: 0

    I just sent an invite to a hotmail account, and the person got it.

  66. B-e-t-a by David+Thompson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did you every stop to think that non-delivery could be the result of an issue at the senders end? Just a thought but they are in beta.

  67. ditto by tomzyk · · Score: 0

    I just want to repeat your post.
    I got an invite from my buddy just last week in my Hotmail account from his gmail address.

    FUD in my opinion too.

    (hopefully everyone else on Slashdot who has NOT had a problem with this happening will post here as well to completely kill this.)

    --
    Karma: NaN
    1. Re:ditto by ghost+cat · · Score: 1

      I sent 3 invites to yahoo addresses and 2 to hotmail, all of them arrived without a hitch. Maybe I was lucky...

    2. Re:ditto by Jim+Starx · · Score: 1

      We should perform a test. Send me an invite.

      --
      The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
  68. Clever ... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone has found a way to make lots of ./ers admit to using Hotmail.

    1. Re:Clever ... by sbpope · · Score: 1
      Someone has found a way to make lots of ./ers admit to using Hotmail.
      Sweet, reading this article was not a complete waste of time after seeing your nugget of wisdom.
  69. That happens to me with AOL people by necronom426 · · Score: 1

    I have e-mailed exactly two people in my whole life who had AOL addresses and both just disappeared. No bounced mail and no e-mail got to them.

    It's like the post office not delivering your letters to towns they don't like!

  70. Irony by telstar · · Score: 1
    "Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another."
    • How ironic that this follows a story titled "Get the Facts".
  71. Same as Yahoo... by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

    I just got my GMail invitation from a friend who sent it to my hotmail account. It doesn't disappear, it goes into the junk mail like Yahoo does. Don't believe me? Here's a screenshot:

    http://www.savefile.com/redir.php?id=1344

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  72. Just Tested It.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Works fine... Sent an email from my gmail.com account to my hotmail.com account. Went directly to the InBox. And I have my Junk Email Filter set to 'Enhanced'.

  73. I'm surpised... by acoustix · · Score: 0, Troll

    at how many of you "geeks" use other people's webmail systems. Seems to me that if Linux is so great (and it is) that you would setup your own mail server.

    How many people here slam M$ and the turn around and check their Hotmail accounts?

    That's what you get for using a free (crappy) service.

    My ISP doesn't even have size restrictions on mail folders.

    -Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:I'm surpised... by data64 · · Score: 1

      How many people here slam M$ and the turn around and check their Hotmail accounts?



      You might also want to ask "How many people had Hotmail accounts before it was bought by Microsoft".
  74. Don't be bitter MS by EssTiDee · · Score: 0

    (Course, this'll just get modded down to troll level like everything else i say) Sounds to me like MS is just mad that they couldn't get their hands on Google earlier...

    1. Re:Don't be bitter MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you will be modded a troll for not reading any of the other comments which show this is non-story.

  75. Scanning Emails by csimpkins · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And everyone was worried about GMAIL scanning/parsing emails... pffft!

  76. It worked as of last night by skermit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I set my father up with a Gmail invite to a Hotmail account as of last night 11pm EST. It doesn't mean that you can't send the invites as IMs to your webmail-restricted friends.

    --
    -Christopher Wu
    http://www.christopherwu.net/
  77. Re:Making a big deal out of nothing... by rnews · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait a minute. You said it was in your bulk folder. Then you start talking about spam. But Hotmail didn't call it spam.

    The invite was certainly bulk. It arrived as a part of a large number of substantively identical email messages. Like with posts to properly run mailing lists and other legitimate bulk email, your invite was solicited, so your copy wasn't spam.

    Note that bulkiness is measurable. Simply count messages that match fuzzy checksums.

    Spamminess, on the other hand, is far harder to measure, as it depends on the users' sometimes erroneous recollections of whether they solicited the bulk messages.

    But Hotmail didn't call it spam. They called it bulk. That sounds quite proper and accurate to me.

  78. I hate FUD, even when it flies towards MS. by BurpingWeezer · · Score: 1

    Screenshot for proof. I got one yesterday.

  79. No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hotmail have been "silently discarding" all mail sent from 6 of my servers since January, none of which are listed on any blacklists and have never sent any spam. So gmail invites going missing really is no surprise to me (and all the other people who own servers that hotmail mysteriously lose mail from).

  80. Can we expect a retraction? by goldspider · · Score: 1

    No? Can't say I'm surprised.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  81. Suddenly... by vinlud · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...half of Slashdots userbase appears to have a Hotmail address??

    --
    Repeat after me: We are all individuals
    1. Re:Suddenly... by Strenoth · · Score: 1

      "Yes, yes we are all individual!"

      [high pitched falsetto]Not Me!

      --

      "It takes a very long time to count to 2 in binary." ~'Fourlegged'

    2. Re:Suddenly... by ^DA · · Score: 0

      Well, I gotta have somewhere to send all the spam you know :)

    3. Re:Suddenly... by mibus · · Score: 1

      What, only one?

      I have about six - mostly for testing-use on MSN Messenger (though I use Jabber these days as much as I can :-).

  82. In other news... by dj245 · · Score: 1
    Emails and invitations sent to Hotmail from Gmail accounts do not bounce...invitations he sent to a Hotmail address bounced

    I would argue that they did in fact bounce, but the bounce was so small that the email was perceived to have hit the server with a "thud", with the ensuing bouncing noises going completely unnoticed.

    In other news, young children are taught that airplanes have wings. A man from Chestershire contradicts this, proclaiming that "Aeroplanes have aerofoils, not wings." Experts from around the world are stumped as both are seemingly correct. The case has been referred to a committee of monkeys to decide once and for all.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  83. A Workaround to this Problem by wrozmiarek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems like the majority of my invites never arrive in my friend's inboxes. To get around this, I send the invite then go into my "Sent Mail" folder to look for the "Sign-up" URL that was sent. I just create a new email and copy and paste the original URL. I haven't had one of these blocked (that I know of). Cheers!

    --
    -- http://GatheredTogether.org - Ministries Helping Ministries
  84. Invited June 15th in Hotmail by timlee · · Score: 1

    I recieved an invite in my Hotmail account instantly

    From : [deleted]
    Sent : Tuesday, June 15, 2004 1:04 PM
    To : Timothy Lee
    Subject : Timothy, [deleted] has invited you to open a Google mail account

  85. empirical testing by untaken_name · · Score: 1

    Any gmail user wishing to conduct an empirical test may send gmail invites to:

    whorin4gmailinvites@hotmail.com

    this is purely for research purposes.

    (yes, this email address is real, and I will report successes to you if you should actually care to send an invite there.)

  86. Rubbish - I just tested by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    I sent myself an e-mail from GMail to my hotmail and yahoo accounts (yeah, I have one on each, what's it to you?) and it was delivered no more than thirty seconds later.

    Get me Snopes on line 1, I have a new urban legend for them.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  87. for the "me too" files.... by hymie3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a friend send me a Google Mail invite to a yahoo address. It never arrived.

    I'm certain that he used the correct address. I can understand "bulking" gmail invites (don't believe it's an honest mistake, but can understand it's possible) as I have had legitimate invites to mailing lists/web sites get placed into the bulk folder.

    I got nothing in my Yahoo account. I was very careful to check the bulk foldler, but nothing ever showed up. Lucky for me, I was able to get the URL for the invite from his sent folder and signed up that way.

  88. Hotmail does allow gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have both a gmail account and a hotmail account and I sent a test. The first email didn't arrive in hotmail, the second email did. Go figure. At least this proves there is no 100% block placed. Now the question is where did my first email go?

  89. Re:4 Gmail invites to give away by Temporal · · Score: 1

    Dude, everyone has gmail invites these days. They're giving them away like candy. I think my cat has five or six. Anyone who hasn't been offered a GMail account yet doesn't have any friends to e-mail with it anyway. :P

  90. Working by PHanT0 · · Score: 2

    I've just gotten this to work...
    (slightly edited to conceal my secret identity)

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

    From : *
    Sent : June 21, 2004 10:47:09 AM
    To : *@hotmail.com
    Subject : tester

    Inbox
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Received: from mproxy.gmail.com ([216.239.56.245]) by mc5-f3.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:47:09 -0700
    Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q44so1741952cwc for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
    Received: by 10.11.118.20 with SMTP id q20mr562509cwc; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jH5i3J0rEhEWO2gbDf1/JE0
    Message-ID:
    Return-Path: *@gmail.com
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jun 2004 13:47:10.0033 (UTC) FILETIME=[3FCD0C10:01C45796]
    View E-mail Message Source

    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    did you block this?

  91. Re:MS & Google (and Quicktime and DR-DOS...) by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    where it appears that some versions of Windows 3.x simply refused to install on it for no good reason and providing only confusing errors.

    That was a beta version of Windows, the error message wasn't very confusing, and the reason wasn't hard to understand: Why give out a beta version of Windows and then try to provide technical support for someone else's OS? I'm pretty sure that version of Windows would run over DRDOS, but would always give the warning message.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  92. All gmail emails showed up at hotmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha, I just posted about sending 2 emails only gettin one. Well guess what, the first email showed up 7 minutes after I sent it (and the 2nd email showed up instantly.)

    This article is bs.

  93. bplap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I posted it under my account they would have rewrote slashcode to mod it -10.

  94. What's wrong with incompatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure government regulation of electrical companies was a good thing? I hardly know any American history though, so this is just abstract, but if a customer wants to buy voltage from one company, why should the government impose a standard voltage? Probably the companies would have agreed to some standard voltage, maybe through a scientific society like, say, IEEE. If companies on the side wanted to offer wierd nonstandard voltage, then they can serve the niche market that wants that.

    Now, I think it's pretty low down by Hotmail to block gmail, but as long as they have a notice on their main page or at least in their license agreement that says ``We block gmail accounts'', I don't see a real problem with them blocking gmail, because people know what their getting.

    The way I see it, as long as the two sides _know_ the facts, all deals are fair.

  95. So that's why... by zonix · · Score: 1

    So the core of this Slashdot "article" is some posting on one guy's blog about losing a invitation he sent to his girlfriend.

    Naturally, invitations of this kind would include the words "penis" and "viagra" (perhaps even "hair loss"). No wonder the mail was marked as junk. :-)

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  96. I want an invite!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can test. Please. Please PaaaLLLLEEEEEEEAAAASE!

    1. Re:I want an invite!!!! by mbennis · · Score: 0

      what's your email then ?

    2. Re:I want an invite!!!! by snopes · · Score: 1

      Still willing to lend a hand to someone?

      mynospam@fightgravity.com

      Simple gratitude or a local postcard in exchange if you like.

    3. Re:I want an invite!!!! by nvparrothead · · Score: 1

      I want an invite also PLEEEEAAASSSSSSSEEEE!
      wierdones at sbcglobal dot net
      THANK YOU THANK YOU

    4. Re:I want an invite!!!! by sinikal · · Score: 0

      I've also been looking for an invite. rage_4411@hotmail.com rage_4411@yahoo.com Thanks

    5. Re:I want an invite!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want an invite also!! Please please please?!?!?! punk11@msn.com or lp_aaf@yahoo.com or ckk403@netscape.net please?!?!

  97. Funny. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

    I sent two to Hotmail accounts this morning and they both arrived just fine.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  98. Invite sent to yahoo by gelsonjr · · Score: 1

    I had someone send me a gmail invite to my yahoo e-mail and it went the junk folder (not a problem though)

  99. fwiw... this worked fine last week by enrico_suave · · Score: 3, Informative

    I sent my wife a gmail invite to her hotmail account... and she accepted it/got the msg no problem...

    i just sent a message from gmail to my hotmail and it was recieved... ?

    I love a good conspiracy, but we might have rattled our tinfoil swords prematurely on this one...

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  100. Also seems to block orkut by Sleetan · · Score: 1

    It also seems to block orkut invites which is a google sponsored community like friendster.

    Noone on hotmail has ever gotten my invitations, including checking their 'spam' folder

    1. Re:Also seems to block orkut by PeekabooCaribou · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can confirm this. Very annoying, especially with the silent deletes. At least bounce it, MSFT.

      --
      "I'll say it again for the logic-impaired." -- Larry Wall.
  101. The problem is pipe by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    not servers. On one of my trips to the middle east a few years ago, we had about 5000 soldiers at our location, and about five 56k modems worth of bandwidth to serve them all. Yes, you read that correctly.

    Think the neighborhood node for your cable modem is slow in the evenings? Brother, you aint seen nothin'.... and to make matters worse, they also throttled that bandwidth down even more by port... 80 was always the slowest. Fortunately for me, ftp wasn't throttled... so my downloads from kernel.org took hours instead of days (hey, a geek's gotta do what a geek's gotta do).

    Increasing the pipe is only part of the issue; you have to filter all that traffic. If you don't control that information stream, classified information will leak, and viruses/worms will run riot. Even on a filtered system, one virus can really make your life miserable. I witnessed this on another delployment... the Anna Kournikova virus got loose in our network... it wrecked havoc for days before we got it under control (send a bunch of lonely, hormonally-poisoned, computer-equiped 19-year-olds a file purporting to be a picture of Anna Kournikova and see what happens... total chaos).

    Increasing services to the troops is good, but it has to be done right, or you might end up with more problems than you started with.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:The problem is pipe by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      On one of my trips to the middle east a few years ago, we had about 5000 soldiers at our location, and about five 56k modems worth of bandwidth to serve them all. Yes, you read that correctly.

      On the other hand, one would think that soldiers in a war zone might expect a little bit of hardship--contrary to popular /. belief, one can survive without access to broadband internet. Just what was on kernel.org that was so all-fired important, anyway?

      If the troops are using that internet connection to write email and keep in touch with the family back home, that's fine.

      56 kbit/s * 5 lines is about 256 kbit/s,
      256 kbit/s = 32 kB/s,
      call it about 15 pages of text per second,
      or about fifty thousand pages of text per hour. To fill that pipe with text, each of those five thousand troops would need to generate more than two hundred pages per day of email.

      If you're allowed to send and receive small images, then each soldier's allowance drops off to, say, twenty-five pages of text and 500K of other data per day.

      People used to communicate over 300 baud connections, remember?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  102. Me Thinks He Wants An Invite... by pdxmac · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another.

    Yeah, I think that's the crux of it.

    Actually, when a kind slashdotter sent me an invite, Yahoo didn't move it or block it...

  103. Confirmed: False. by Temporal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just sent a couple e-mails from my gmail account to my hotmail account. The first one was delayed a few minutes, but the second one went through instantaneously. My friend (who originally invited me) says she successfully invited someone using a hotmail address yesterday.

    So, yeah. I'm afraid this is... not true. At least as far as hotmail is concerned.

  104. Re:Making a big deal out of nothing... by pilkul · · Score: 1

    What? Who cares what they call it? Whatever word you use, a spam folder is a spam folder, and the entire point of its existence is that it's junk you're not supposed to have to read. You can't go around putting legitimate mail in it, causing people to miss it, and then explain it all away by saying, oh, I said it was bulk. What a lame excuse.

  105. Data Point: It worked for me by TheSync · · Score: 1

    I sent a Gmail invite to a hotmail user on Friday, he got it, and signed up for Gmail.

  106. What the Hell's a GMAIL anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Concerned minds want to know

  107. Slashdot FUD by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

    For a community that is so up in arms about other people spreading FUD, I find "stories" like this to be insanely amusing. Keep up the great work guys...

  108. But think financially... by FearTheFrail · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While it may bring universal (nationwide?) standards to e-mailing, you know that it will be seen as a potential source of revenue.

    Shortly thereafter, they'll set in place a registration system that wants you to put in a checking or credit card account with the rest of your information... ...and then they start taxing e-mails. A penny or two per e-mail is something the public could be cowed into, despire what we /.ers think about it, and by the time it can be adequately questioned, the public will be too accustomed to paying, the gov't too accustomed to collecting, and we'll be stuck.

    I think the continued deregulation is worth risking a GMail invite or two.

    --
    ___ In the words of Gen. Douglas McArthur: "I'll be right back."
  109. I call Bullshit by Graf · · Score: 1

    I mailed a gmail invite to a Hotmail address this morning, and it got through fine.

  110. Are you sure this is legal Mr. McCracken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dunno.
    It's fun though, isn't it?

  111. Gmail blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gmail sends email and violates the RFC. the RFC for SMTP clearly says that the receiving server must send a banner before the sending MTA can say "HELO" or "EHLO".

    Gmail sends its hello before the banner is returned. Many ISPs will block this sort of direct-to-mx/ratware technique on site.

    Our mail server does this.

  112. In defence of Yahoo! Mail by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    I've had a Yahoo! Mail account for about 9 years (I'm British, but I had my yahoo.com account before they introduced a .co.uk service). It's the address I give out to untrusted third parties, and more than 90% of the spam - and I get a LOT of spam after all this time - goes straight in the bulk mail folder where I can safely ignore it. It's a good service which does exactly what it says on the tin and costs me nothing.

    If only I could have a more snappy address though. Even in ye olden days of Windows 95 all the best ones were taken :-(

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  113. URGENT! Let's test the theory one more time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ;)
    Send any and ALL Gmail invites to...
    pils3n@hot mail dot com
    (replace the '3' with an 'e').

    This is strictly, er, for research!
    Yeah, thats it! ;)

  114. Invite me? by attobyte · · Score: 1

    Can someone invite me to gmail? :)

    Pleassseee

    --
    I didn't use the preview button, so get over it!!!!

    Mike

    1. Re:Invite me? by mbennis · · Score: 0

      your email then ?
      mbennis

    2. Re:Invite me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd appreciate one, oneandonlyice@yahoo.com

      Thanks.

    3. Re:Invite me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about me? wizzyx at rogers.com

    4. Re:Invite me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, I would like to be invited also, if you would be so kind to allow me to bask in splendiforous GMail!!!

      negated(NO SPAM PLEASE)@comcast.net

      Danka!

      S.

  115. hrms by onicrom · · Score: 1

    It appears that there has been a lift on the 'blocking':

    From: myname
    To: myname
    Subject: Kyle, xxx has invited you to open a Google mail account ....

    --
    "scholars never agree and fools seldom differ"
  116. I guess I'm the only one by Todd+Fisher · · Score: 1

    I don't know where all these reports of "worked fine for me" are coming from. Not only did my emails not go through - Hotmail formatted my hard drive and later a man in a dark blue suit came to my house and kicked my dog.

    --


    --I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
  117. Spammy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stoped using Hotmail when they woulnd't do anything about spam mail and continued to spam my inbox with upgrade offers that would reduce spam. POP3 FOREVER!!!

  118. WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by lcsjk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry, but I seem to be on the trailing edge of technology today. What is this invite stuff? Seems I don't get invited to nothing anymore!

    1. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Gmail is a beta mail server offered by Google. They give you 1GB of space for holding mail, and it features an incredible user interface and great searching tools.

      Because it is still in beta you cannot sign up for an account. You have to be invited by somebody whom already has an account. Speaking of which, I have a million invites if anyone wants one....

    2. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you're feeling generous, oneandonlyice@yahoo.com

      Thanks.

    3. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,
      please, if it is not too much disturbing, I would be thankful if you invite me. lucianogiordana at horizon dot com dot br

      Thanks in advance.

    4. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Ricwot · · Score: 0, Redundant

      A million eh, my uni only allows 2mb, so I'd be incredulously grateful if you'd wing one towards rjw16@st-and.ac.uk,
      ooh, now to see if the uni spam filter works or will I have to rely on thunderbird.

    5. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oo, oo, I'd *love* an invite if you have extra!! You'd be my new best friend for life.

      californiauberalice@yahoo.com

    6. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Ryan+Huddleston · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Goo348@yahoo.com would appreciate one...

    7. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by mpathetiq · · Score: 0, Redundant

      i'd like an invite... mpathetiq@excite.com

    8. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just watching all of the AC's reply to this with email addresses is hillarious. How many spmamers want to flood these accounts today? :-)

      --
      $ man woman *
      -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
    9. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get so much spam already, any more won't matter.

    10. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be eternally grateful for an invite. Admittedly a big part of it is wanting to feel all |337, but the extra space would certainly be useful for me.

      infornography@graffiti.net

      Thanks in advance.

    11. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by d_jedi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      An invite would be very, very welcome!! schwREMOVE-THISeit @NOSPAMutoronto.ca Please remove the appropriate text as appropriate to compose my e-mail address (ie. REMOVE-THIS, NOSPAM)

      --
      I am the maverick of Slashdot
    12. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by elvisdechico · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      if you still have invites, i would really appreciate one sent to elvisdechico@hotmail.com thanks!

    13. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by GamingEngineer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, if you have extra invites, I'd totally appreciate one... pdonate @yahoo.com

    14. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      I know this is slashdot and all, but you REALLY didn't read the summary text.. hell, even the subject line!!

      I'll say it slowly..

      HOTMAIL IS BLOCKING GMAIL EMAIL (AND INVITES)

      So what do you do? Ask for an invite to be sent to a hotmail address. Thumbs up and a wink, dude.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    15. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to jump on the bandwagon with a "me too", but I'll go to those extreme lengths for a Gmail invite. Hopefully you (or someone else reading this with a spare invite) has a moment to perform a random act of generosity for a complete stranger (albeit a fellow /.'er) Please send to thebeezman at yahoo dot com Thanks!

    16. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, seeing as though the article is bullshit.

    17. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by elvisdechico · · Score: 1

      except for the fact that plenty of slashdotters and farkers are getting invites at hotmail addresses just fine... thanks anyway, dude!

    18. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      ssmith619[at]yahoo[dot]com If you still have any, I'm really curious. Thanks if you do, and no problem if you don't.

    19. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Harbinger_Of_Sorrow · · Score: 1

      I would give it a shot, if someone can send me an invitation at masternospam@yahoo.com, don't remove anything it is the right email :)

    20. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by NivekEnterprises · · Score: 1

      ok, I would appreciate it, nivek_ent@yahoo.com thanks.

    21. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by dealsites · · Score: 0
    22. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by kimsk · · Score: 1

      I don't want to say this, but I want one too. Please send the invite to kimsk112@hotmail.com

      Thanks in advance!

    23. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      I'd really like one. My address is above. Thanks.

    24. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Hinde01 · · Score: 1

      Please send me an invite! I would be extremely grateful. If you can find the time to send me an invite i would gladly dig through my hundreds of messages in my bulk mail folder. hinde01@yahoo.com

    25. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Rushmore · · Score: 1

      Me too please. :)

      tlavier@NOSPAMsympatico.ca

    26. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo, let's see if this is true :)

      webmaster AT inerciasensorial com br

    27. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by rockmanac · · Score: 1

      2mb? Wow.. Marquette at least gave us 5mb on the old system and at least 10mb on the Exchange system they installed a couple of years ago.

      -A

    28. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Flagbrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      I got my invite fine at my hotmail address.

    29. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by rminkler · · Score: 1

      If you could please send me one, it would be much appreciated. Many thanks! minrob24@evergreen.edu

    30. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would also like an invite. vway2@hotmail.com Thanks!

    31. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by digitalPortal · · Score: 1

      hmmm..i better test if my server is pro/con this whole thing. in other words I would love an INVITE. how about I send you a postcard from spain in exchange fot the invite??? if feeling gracious please send to: tom at digitalportal dot com mucho appreciated! will post back stats as soon as I can figure out how to setup an account.

    32. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by digitalPortal · · Score: 1

      hmmm..i better test if my server is pro/con this whole thing. in other words I would love an INVITE. how about I send you a postcard from spain in exchange fot the invite??? if feeling gracious please send to: tom at digitalportal dot com mucho appreciated! will post back stats as soon as I can figure out how to setup an account.

    33. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by thatnerdguy · · Score: 1, Informative

      so did I, and i also sent email from my gmail account to my hotmail account just fine.

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    34. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Steeplerot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Send me a gmail invite plz cuz teh chixx0rz will waNt my pen0r then kthaNX steeplerot@yahoo.com

      --
      Vaughn "Its always darkest before it goes pitch black."
    35. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Blkdeath · · Score: 0, Troll
      Speaking of which, I have a million invites if anyone wants one....

      OOOH! A million invites? Man, can you send one over at " incredibly@gullible.bandwagon.biz "? That'd be awesome! Then I'd be cool, tech-sheik, and the envy of both my friends (even the non-geek!). Boy, Gmail, now I can finally get laid! Thanks a million man!

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    36. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, your site is currently offline...

    37. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by mroneguy · · Score: 1

      I'd love an invite please. beerchillin@yahoo.com Thanks!

    38. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1

      Please...

      g0ldnugget AT yahoo.com

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
    39. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      I have no problem sounding like a lemming, unlike some others above... me too, please!

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    40. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Ricwot · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure whether running solaris on the servers has gone to their head, they may well be stuck in the past, where everyone used text, and web sites wer black text on a grey background, or maybe they're still in the whole dialup BB mode, which is odd cos we get 100Mbps net connection...

    41. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by NemosomeN · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would like an invite, send it to nNOSPAMeNOSPAMmREMOVEoTAKE-OUTsDON'T-TYPE-THIS-PAR ToI-LIKE-CHEESEmFISHeHEADSn AT yTAKE-ME-OUTahoTO-THE-BALLGAMEo.com

      ------
      Note, taking out the bullshit won't get a real email address.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    42. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      what's even funnier is seeing some hotmail addresses in there...
      Now I know that nobody reads the article, and only about 10% even bother reading the summary.

      But surely they read the TITLE?....

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    43. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not out of invites (or patience), please include me as well: Kaye.Johnson@vai dot org

    44. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by loraksus · · Score: 1

      if anyone has a spare, root ((((AT))))) loraksus.org

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    45. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if you could send an invite to zaldabus@yahoo.com , I would be eternally grateful.

    46. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by billfuddled · · Score: 1

      If one more invite exists, could someone be so kind as to send it to: g4dz00ksyahoocom

    47. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by jennx2001 · · Score: 1

      i would love one if anyone still has any available... jennx2001@comcast.net
      thanks!

    48. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      Now I'm feeling kind of left out. Ping me with one would ya? thedocisn2 AAAAAAATTTTTTTTT yahoo.com

    49. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by somari · · Score: 1

      Could I get one if you feel the urge for some generosity towards the lesser mortals...
      rshyamsundar001 at yahoo dot com.

    50. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by CrypticSparrow · · Score: 1

      Feeling left out, so send me one to theSparrow[AT]iprimus[DOT]com[DOT]au Thanks :-)

      --
      "It is difficult to catch a black cat in a dark room. Especially if there is no cat there." - Confucius
    51. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by OhPlease · · Score: 1

      I feeling so left out. Please, send an invite to me too. seaapple@cogeco.com

    52. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by torex · · Score: 1

      well, since everybody is asking, can i please have one too? ghatores@yahoo.es thanks ;)

      --
      you are not a beautiful and unique snowflake
    53. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone can.. please help me out with a gmail invitation -THANKS-
      admin at grindcore dot com

    54. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Good grief. EVERYONE THINK and ac says he has a 'million' invites, and how many people post thier e-mail? good grief half with no obfuscation. any spam robots just got a bunch of new addy's.
      I'm not shure but I think a new troll was just invented.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    55. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by rush22 · · Score: 1

      I'm not feeling left out, please don't give me one. Thanks.

    56. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you please send me an invitation to
      sirishfall@yahoo.com. I will be very thankful for that.

    57. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      Haha, now that I've reaped the karma-benefits of a +4 post (Which totals +0, ha, what wit will buy you), anyone got an invite left? sahashlara@yahoo.com

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
  119. Woohoo! It worked! by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 1

    So that's how you get a Gmail account: post a transparent plea on Slashdot. Thanks (you know who you are)! :-)

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  120. Look! Black Helicopters! by Aennor · · Score: 1

    I have GMail accounts and I was sent the invitation through Hotmail. Thanks for reminding me though, I do need to check the ground straps on my copper cage at home and change the foil on my helmet. Shiny side out ya'll! GMail invitations are likely seen as spam because of the headers... sent as "from" one address but the sender is another. There's lots of email that does this. More likely is the "press" wasn't smart enough to look in that other folder. It's FUD alright and Yahoo! couldn't have paid for better press coverage. If you care about your email that much, don't use free email providers like Hotmail or Yahoo!. Use your ISP (as long as it's not AOHell), run your own server or pay to have one run for you. Then only you will decide how to implement spam protection. Baaaa! Baaaa!

  121. Re:Making a big deal out of nothing... by kevcol · · Score: 1

    To be accurate, Hotmail's spam folder is not called either a bulk or spam folder. It's called 'Junk E-Mail'. I agree with your semantic dissection of bulk vs spam (anyone who's spent time configuring an MTA, procmail recipes and spamassassin would as well I gather) but Hotmail calls it junk.

  122. Orkut by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hotmail had this same problem with Orkut's invites a while back.

  123. Why would ISPs block Gmail invites? by thedillybar · · Score: 1
    Do you really think ISPs want their users to use their e-mail service? They provide 1 or 2 e-mail accounts with every connection. You can't not get the e-mail account; you pay for it regardless. The ISP will continue to bring in the same income; if 90% of their users switch to Gmail, I think they'll be happy!

    It will be years before enough people complain that they don't need (and shouldn't be paying for) their ISP e-mail accounts.

  124. Quality Posts? by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

    I checked back to the referenced blogs ...

    Even the blog posters claim ppl are running around, claiming the sky is falling, for no reason.

    Do we need to quarantine posts in order to keep /. quality from tanking?

    Cheers,
    -- The Dude

  125. nope, wrong. by ph43thon · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what this is supposed to be about, but I guess I'll be nice in my response. I just had someone on hotmail accept an invite from me last week. Ah well, nevermind, THIS IS THE MOST STUPID FUCKING SHIT. "I think maybe hotmail might be blocking gmail invites and gmail email!!" You are so full of shit it is idiotic. Maybe his girlfriend is dense and doesn't check her junk folder. "It just disappeared! I think hotmail is blocking invites!" not.. "My dorky girlfriend didn't check her junk folder." or "maybe I made a simple spelling error." And, if all that was checked.. why isn't it mentioned?

    Anyhoo, he says it's a non-story at the end.. but maybe hotmail only blocks some invites.. (whoooo mysterious..) how does this get posted? Just for the trolling?

    p

    PS Don't get all whiney at me for being overly sarcastic.. this story is a joke, and it deserves to be turned into a human and then strangled in its sleep.

  126. Irresponsible and defamatory story by hkb · · Score: 1

    I've personally sent two Hotmail users GMail invites in the past two days (Saturday and Sunday) alone, and I think also thursday and Friday (I'm handing them out to anyone who wants one). They all went through fine.

    When will Microsoft finally get tired of these pieces of slander from a company who's interest is seeing Microsoft go down? It's one thing to be a hobbyist site posting this trash, but it's another for a company to.

    Way to check your facts before posting a story with the topic "Hotmail Blocks Gmail Emails (and Invites)". Not "Possibly Blocks" or "Might Be Blocking", but "Blocks". It's not like you couldn'tve asked the tons of readers who have already refuted this story.

    When The Onion has a more trustworthy reputation than you, you know you've got a problem.

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    1. Re:Irresponsible and defamatory story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have an invite purlease. jah.rasta@manx.net cheers!

    2. Re:Irresponsible and defamatory story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me too, oneandonlyice@yahoo.com

      Thanks.

  127. Hello, Slashdot? by pclminion · · Score: 1
    Editors, WHY do you post a story that contains such controversial information, when the claims can so easily be verified? All you had to do was a simple test, sending a Gmail invite to a Hotmail account. This would have taken what, ten seconds, maybe a minute?

    Would you post a "Linus Torvalds found dead in bathtub" story without trying to confirm it?

    Seeing as many of the Slashdot editors also work for "real" paper publications, I can't believe you people are still employed with supposed research "skills" like these.

  128. I use both by chamblah · · Score: 1
    I got my Gmail invite this weekend and it was mailed to my Hotmail account.

    Also invited my wife into Gmail and mailed the invite her Hotmail account as well.

    Had no problems receiving the email invtes at all.

  129. What about yahoo? by Scott+Richter · · Score: 1
    As for the Yahoo one, that is definitely true.

    Are we talking invites or emails? I sent a plain email from my gmail account to yahoo, and it got there fine.

  130. My cousin works at Google: by purduephotog · · Score: 2

    And as such most of his relatives have gmail accounts. I just photographed his sister's wedding; we've been using the gmail to send the large images back and forth (about 4mb to 6mb each).

    Every email from gmail to me gets bounced or delayed for up to 4 days (gmail->hotmail). Any email from anyone else, goes in just fine.

    Any email from hotmail->gmail, delayed. Any email using a relay such as my rr.com one, goes in just fine.

    Conclusion: Hotmail is dicking with my emails and REALLY pissing me off.

    1. Re:My cousin works at Google: by Razman · · Score: 1

      I just sent email to my hotmail account...
      and received it instantly...

      no delays.

  131. Yahoo does not block Gmail invites (Re:Stunning) by otisg · · Score: 1

    I've received several Gmail invitations, and can confirm that they do not automatically end up in Yahoo's Bulk folder. Of course, this may not be true for everyone.

    As a side note - Gmail invitations are being offered in bulk now, and Alexa shows it.

    --
    Simpy
  132. gmail doesn't work for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone kindly gave me gmail invite ... I *think* I registered successfully, but no matter what I do I can't get past a "Loading ..." message on the first page.

    So I can't test this problem out.

  133. Hate me if you must... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But I just don't get the excitement people are having about Gmail. If any other company offered a similar service (reading your emails and sending you spam based on those emails) nearly all slashdotters would be outraged. But, when Google does it, it's perfectly OK.

    FYI, even if Google is a decent corporation and will respect your privacy, it does not mean that will always be the case!

    Feel free to mod me as flamebait, because that's exactly what I am!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  134. Gmail invites by richie2000 · · Score: 1
    Got more invites than you need? Put them to good use: www.gmail4troops.com or www.gmailforthetroops.com.

    ( Wil, you're good people. Remember that. \m/ )

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  135. Hotmail works just fine. by kasek · · Score: 2

    I got my gmail account a few days ago, and the invite was sent to my hotmail account. No problems.

    I just now sent a message from my gmail account to my hotmail account, and it was received just fine.

    1. Re:Hotmail works just fine. by Daikak · · Score: 1

      yeah i was about to say myself, i got an invite from a Hotmail address to get my Gmail acct... more rumors prolly...

  136. Retitle article: Gmail unreliable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gmail is still in beta, right?

    A beta service was demonstrating weird behavior when interacting which two other non-beta services.

    Your conclusion:
    Someone is deliberately blocking the beta service!

    My Conclusion:
    Gmail is still in beta and may not be a reliable mail system.

  137. Faugh. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    Maybe this was on Tuesday or Wedensday of last week, when there was akamai and hotmail issues? "Oh, he's not getting my email, so Hotmail must be blocking Gmail."

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  138. Re:Confirmed: False. by khallow · · Score: 1
    So, yeah. I'm afraid this is... not true. At least as far as hotmail is concerned.

    Well, that runs counter to my experience. A friend did the invite process, email never arrived. I watched over his shoulder so he got the data correct. However, there's a catch, I had set my Hotmail spam filter up on "enhanced level" and all spam so caught got deleted. I quickly changed that when I realized what I did, but probably the damage was already done.

    Here's a few possibilities. First, that Hotmail and Yahoo blocks some or most gmail invites. Since some get through you can't prove they're blocking it. Sounds like the most popular conspiracy theory. Second, that Hotmail (and Yahoo) treats the invites as spam (perhaps depending on the user's spam acceptance and retention options). This could delete gmail invites automatically. Finally, perhaps Google didn't send out the gmail invite.

    I consider the middle possibility the most likely, I think. Hotmail and Yahoo probably are treating these emails like spam and frankly they are unsolicited advertisement. This is exactly what the spam filters are supposed to catch.

  139. But hotmail drops messages anyway by Feanturi · · Score: 1

    Hasn't anyone with a hotmail address noticed that sometimes you just don't get messages? It happens with them, that's why I don't rely on hotmail, it's just a spam-catcher that I use when I need to put an email address in a public or semi-public location. A friend of mine recently switched to Yahoo because she thought that hotmail was censoring messages of a pagan nature. I figured that was hogwash, but the fact was she hadn't been getting messages she'd been expecting. That's just hotmail sucking, IMHO, no conspiracy needed, just incompetance.

  140. Hotmail generally sucking by phorm · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've actually had a lot of issues with hotmail in the last... 3-6 months? Email bounce with server errors (accounts aren't full so that's not the problem), or there's a lengthy delay between sending the email and it actually being received.

    So, this may not be so much indicative of a problem with hotmail and gmail as it is hotmail in general. Possibly they're lagged in processing the some bazillion spams that must pass through there, anyone have any stats on how much spam passes through hotmail daily?

  141. Re:Woohoo! It worked! by bwalling · · Score: 1

    So that's how you get a Gmail account: post a transparent plea on Slashdot. Thanks (you know who you are)! :-)

    I hear it's happening on RoadRunner now! wallinbl at tampabay dot rr dot com.

  142. Ever heard of FASTMAIL ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why waist your time with yahoo, hotmail and crap like that,when there are way better email providers like FASTMAIL

    http://fastmail.fm/

    ive never had a problem with them at all

  143. Wait till Gmail Opens up for all! by earthstar · · Score: 0

    Once Gmail does become vailable to everyone, iam sure millions are gonna signup,&then hotmail or anyother company wouldnt dare try blocking mails from gmail id. Already ppl will vet hotmail out for their measly 2 mb inbox.
    THEY CANT DO THIS FOR LONG>

    1. Re:Wait till Gmail Opens up for all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      yahoo used to have a 6mb limit; but they recently "upgraded" me to 100mb.... I wonder if they smell the possibility of losing ad revenue from the possible exodus to gmail/ or the likes when they go live?

  144. Hmm, must be news :) by B-a-Z.nl · · Score: 0

    I recieved an invite 2 days ago, so if it is done htey must have done it "first thing monday morning chief" Strange and very unethical if true (but we knew that allready of microsoft :-p )

  145. Ok, I just received one this morning at hotmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had asked the person to send it to Yahoo, and it never showed up in the INBOX or JUNK folders... so I think yahoo is blocking them completely.

    She then fowarded the invite to my Hotmail account and it arrived in my inbox. Maybe it blocks an invite sent directly, but if the sender fowards it instead it does go right into your inbox.

  146. Vast majority of people don't want a 'GMAIL INVITE by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 0, Troll
    Most people would just click the checkbox next to the message and then hit the SPAM button to mark it as such, and send it to the bulk email folder where it belongs.

    I will check gmail out when it is generally available, but I don't want spam from anyone including google.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  147. incorrect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is simply not true. I have been able to receive gmail invites on hotmail. That was a couple of days a go. Unless something has changed between now and then .. I doubt it.

  148. Re:I hate liberals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Isn't it nice to have someone to hate
    Isn't it nice to beat 'em in to a pulp

    That guy ain't like you
    Hurry, take him out
    It's as good as sex
    To kick the fucker about

  149. Blackhole by HannethCom · · Score: 1

    I think what is being experienced here is the Hotmail blackhole effect. Some emails get through, others are bounch, and others are used to feed the Hotmail beast. I send emails from my shaw.ca account to hotmail and it can take 3 days to get through to the person. There was a while there that my emails where just being munched.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
  150. MS and decree? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Personally, I am a bit shocked that MS would be so brazen about this. I am pretty sure that it is exactly this kind of behavior that MS agreed to not do in the latest decree. I wonder if Google can have a lawsuit against MS as well as the group that is suppose to enforce the decree (perhaps DOJ).

    This really shows that it is in everybodies best interest to have a large number of small ISPs over a few big ones.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:MS and decree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the summary, article or any one of the hundreds of comments all saying this is bullshit?

    2. Re:MS and decree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid fucking fag

  151. Yup. I get : Service not available: Right now ;) by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    Newsgroups down, email down... sorta feels like Hotmail on a regular basis (Hotmail is at least honest- "Server too Busy" is their response)

  152. Re:Confirmed: False. by Gurny · · Score: 1

    Well I got invited to gmail about 3 days ago, and the invite went to hotmail. I got it pretty fast. I wouldn't put it past MS to do this, but I think maybe the submitter needs to not cry wolf so fast.

    --
    I only post twice a year, who needs a sig?
  153. GMail using POP/SMTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Access to GMail using POP/SMTP - work good for me using Windows. Bad point is it runs on Windows only for now as it requires some .net libs installed.

    http://jaybe.org/info.htm

  154. all my gmail invites by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    All my virus infected bogus gmail invites have made it to their destination, and that's whats important here I think.

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  155. not blocking; just rejecting typos... by cks3 · · Score: 1

    I've successfully invited over 5 people with Hotmail accounts. People need to learn to type...

    --
    http://www.sampletheweb.com
  156. Simple by Afbc0m · · Score: 0

    Everyone switch to google, they aren't going to start blocking themselves.

    I'm giving away invites too, mail afbcom@gmail.com to request.

  157. Gmail Down Today? by altek · · Score: 1

    Anyone else having problems even logging into their account today? I keep getting an error:

    Server Error

    Gmail is temporarily unavailable. Cross your fingers and try again in a few minutes. We're sorry for the inconvenience.

    ???

    --
    THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
    1. Re:Gmail Down Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup. has been for the last hour - from what I can tell.

  158. Yahoo blocks invites completely by Ingenium13 · · Score: 2

    I personally received a GMail invite. However, on my yahoo account I never received the invite. It was sent twice even! It didn't appear in my inbox OR bulk mail folder (I checked, double checked, and triple checked!). The only way I was able to receive it was the sender forwarded me a copy of the invite. Shame on Yahoo for this. I was going to just use the GMail account for novelty, but after a stunt like this I no longer trust Yahoo to be reliable and plan to switch 100% to my GMail address.

    1. Re:Yahoo blocks invites completely by davepk · · Score: 1

      I too had an invite completely disapear. Not only that, but when i finally registered at gmail my prefered username (myusername@pacbell.net) was taken. I bet SBC/Yahoo! is now the proud owner of myusername@gmail.com

  159. Update the headline post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot should show some integrity and update the banner post to state that this story has been debunked. Leaving it up unchanged is misleading and wrong.

  160. Don't know about invites but by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    I sent myself an email from my gmail account to my hotmail account. It took some time to get through, but it did eventually come through (just as I was writing a nastygram to support@hotmail.com, so maybe they just installed a keylogger and send the messages through when someone complains, just kidding ;-)).

    Anyway, I would have your friend email support@hotmail.com and ask what is going on (and cite the ZDNet article), and at the same time, file a bug report for gmail so they have record of it.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  161. I received my invite through MSN by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
    I just received my invite through MSN, which to me, seems to be the same as a Hotmail account : I haven't adjusted any spamfilters, and all was in the default state : Makes this story a bit crap :/

    Then again, this is Slashdot, so we rather print foul stuff about Micr$soft then actually confirm it.

  162. Now now children...settle down by trainsnpep · · Score: 1
    This is the equivalent of three kids playing around. Google has the shiny new fire truck, and says "Anyone can play with it, just let me keep it." Hotmail and YahooW are so jealous: they want to play with it, but they want it to be theirs, so they can keep it and admire it, and get all the attention that Google gets. So, as much as want to play with the new fire truck, they refuse to because it would give Google more attention.

    This is a very poor business move too: It shows that Microsoft and Yahoo! are seriously afraid of loosing users to GMail, so much so that they're willing to take away a portion of their users' rights. How do users reflect on this when they find they're being hoarded, and essentially held onto like a cell phone contract. Do not pass Go(ogle). Do not collect 1000GB.

    A better move would be to make their service some how more unique than GMail. Businesses prosper because they've found a niche. Whether that niche is for a general need (a grocery store where there are none for 15 miles), or a specific need (a parakeet shop right in the same town as a pet store which has very few parakeets), Microsoft's Hotmail and Yahoo! need to redefine their niche to provide competition for GMail, not attempt to stifle it by hurting their own users. Hurting their own users will only drive them away.

    Some people at Microsoft and Yahoo! barely got their degrees in business...

    --
    --<Mike>--
    1. Re:Now now children...settle down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what does the fact that you believed an article that was incorrect and then postulated on it signify?

      Hotmail is NOT blocking GMail invites. Period.

      Your predjudiced conclusions are noted and filed appropriately.

  163. Are you a truck? by Duhavid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Are you a truck?

    You said to ask you that.

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  164. Re:4 Gmail invites to give away by pk69 · · Score: 1

    pls email one to me ;) phlite at hotmail.com

    --
    http://phlite.net Lay out on the beach in Rocky Point, Mexico : http://www.granizo.com
  165. Gmail does, in fact, get through to Hotmail by trepan · · Score: 1

    I just sent a message (not an invite) from my Gmail account to my Hotmail account, and though it ended up in my "Junk Folder," it did arrive safe and sound.

  166. FALSE by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    I got an invitation today, in my hotmail account, thanks to martin peck

  167. Re:4 Gmail invites to give away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one for me as well pls ... v__d(at)hotmail(dot)com ...no more hotmail...finally :)

  168. No more friends... by rowanxmas · · Score: 1

    So all of my nerd friends now have GMail accounts, and I have already had 11 invitations. Yesterday I got 5 at a time.

    If you respond to this post I will invite the highest modded replies when I get more invites. Which should be soon since I am using GMail for all of my email exclusively.

    --rowan

    1. Re:No more friends... by Down8 · · Score: 1

      Worth a shot.

      You're a generous person, it seems. If ya still got some to spare, I'd like one: down8 [at] yahoo

      Many thanks,
      -bZj

      --
      .sig
    2. Re:No more friends... by xenoxion · · Score: 1

      I'd like one if you'd be willing to share.

      First name: Michael
      Last name: Lapadula
      E-mail: venesectrix139@yahoo.com

  169. The did it before and lost by ziegast · · Score: 1

    Back in 1998, Hotmail was blocking all greeting card e-mail from Blue Mountain Arts to their users while allowing greeting cards from their own service. Microsoft was sued (article search). Microsoft lost.

    If Microsoft gets sued again, the winner should get an award multiplier for Microsoft being a second-time (3-time? 10-time?) offender.

    1. Re:The did it before and lost by base3 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, this actually involved client-side filters in Outlook Express, which isn't really the same thing. I am amazed that Microsoft lost on this--it opens the door for any spammer (not that Blue Mountain Arts is a spammer) to sue if blocked by any client-side filter turned on by default.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  170. I would like a gmail invite please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to sound like another lemming, but wow I would be very grateful to receive a gmail invite:

    fxmccloud@yahoo.com

    Thanks so much, and take care

    -Jared

  171. Fark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been picked up by Fark, so it must be true.

    Is it possible that Slashdot will get farked?

  172. Ok I'm desperate... by Vampire69 · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'been trying for months now to get a gmail account to claim the username vampire (if it's not already taken, it probably is by now *sigh*). Since pleas on slashdot seem have worked for a number of other people and I'm extremely desperate at this point, I'm posting this "grovel". :P If someone is feeling generous please send an invite to vampire at iglou dot com.

    TIA!

    1. Re:Ok I'm desperate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool, thanks for the suggestion! Now I've got a cool gmail name!

  173. GOT IT, Re:I will test it if you send the invite by Linuxathome · · Score: 1

    Got an invite thanks. Don't send me anymore. So far I can confirm Yahoo mail sends the invite to Bulk email folder (the spam mail folder). See a screenshot here:

    http://www.linuxathome.com/images/gmailtest.jpg

  174. It is not intentional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hotmail is known for it's bad "load balancing" tech. They always had a lot of servers randomly delaying and refusing connections on SMTP port and just a few answering them on time.

    There are whole threads about that behaviour on most MTA devel lists, like this one, from years ago. Nothing changed since then.

  175. It Ain't True by Hyperrrprank · · Score: 1

    I received my Gmail invite at my regular Hotmail account 3 days ago, and after reading this post I tested the system by sending myself an email from Gmail to Hotmail. Both the invite (sent by a friend while I watched) and the test email came through in less than a minute. I also watched two other people receive invites at Hotmail accounts. I'm not sure if other people encountered problems earlier, but this certainly isn't a current problem.

  176. I've test4ed it by VariableSanity · · Score: 1

    I just sent myself a little not from Gmail to hotmail and it went through no problems.

  177. Someone Invite Me Please! by MeBadMagic · · Score: 1

    I'd love to be invited to use GMail.

    Give me an invite.
    I'd be more than happy to reply back to this post wether or not it worked.

    mebadmagic at yahoo.com

    B-)

    --
    A friend will come and bail you out of jail, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "damn that was fun!"
  178. Military? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You who stop others from having freedom of speech by simply killing them shall have no rights to have Gmail accounts. Signed Allah the Mighty from the Skyes.

  179. Re:Vast majority of people don't want a 'GMAIL INV by ItMustBeEsoteric · · Score: 1

    You do realize gmail invites aren't sent automatically, right?

    They're called invites because a person who has gmail already--presumably a friend of yours--has to invite you.

  180. The truth by nbahi15 · · Score: 1

    It sounds like the truth behind the matter is that Hotmail just has trouble delivering mail. No plan to prevent email from arriving from GMail, simply an inability for Microsoft's servers to deal with primetime. But didn't we already know that?

  181. I'm sure it's in their TOS somewhere by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    I'm sure their TOS has soemthing in there that says they can do whatever they want to do with your mail. You know...that thing you clicked but didn't read - the thing that Northwest judge said didn't apply to you! Wait - that means that what they are doignis illegal then, dpesn't it?

  182. Re:Stunning (and irrelevant) by gosand · · Score: 1
    I don't know if it's legal, but it's certainly unethical.

    Sort of irrelevant, since it sounds highly doubtful that it is even TRUE.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  183. Gmail invite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone have mercy on me and send an invite: wizzyx at rogers.com

  184. It's worth pointing out by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    That amount of pipe was for the entire base, and included all traffic, not just plain-text email. When you add in web-surfing and email attachments, that pipe bogged down quickly. It was very helpful when we added a webcache that aggressively cached popular pages locally, but that equipment came later; it wasn't in our original boots-on-the-ground manifest.

    It sounds like you're inferring that I selfishly sucked down the entire base's bandwidth for my kernel downloads, preventing fathers from receiving pictures of their newborn children and causing marital strife and hardship. No sir, I stayed up and downloaded my kernel updates in the middle of the night to minimize the impact on more-important traffic. I may be a geek and love my computers, but I'm not a complete cretin.

    Also, for the record, a bunch of that download traffic consisted of mappacks and updates for the multi-tent counterstrike LAN we had constructed (with our own cables/laptops/switches, BTW, not the military's stuff). Hardship is a given, but troops in the field are usually highly motivated to improve their lot as best they can... a couple of deployments will make almost anyone into a proficient scavenger, jury-rigger, and duct-tape mechanic (the Marines in particular are masters at this). Don't discount the value of a fatter pipe for the troops; I'm sure they'd find creative ways to use it, just as we did.

    Besides... 300 baud? Where is your humanity, sir? I think that's against the geneva conventions.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  185. Gmail invite by mtrupe · · Score: 1

    I've got a gmail invite that I am willing to give away to a deserving person. email me at mtrupert@NOSPAMyahoo.com

    http://rupertzone.net (who deserves a gmail invite?)

  186. Not here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, this didn't happen to me. I received an invite from someone just last week on my Hotmail account.

    No problem here.

  187. OT: How do you get invites to your gmail account? by angle_slam · · Score: 1

    I just bought a gmail account off of Ebay for cheap and got an email address. However, I would like to get a few more. I was under the impression that Google sends invites to the users that the users can forward to whomever they choose. But how is that determined? Does every gmail user get invites to send to others or not?

  188. I actually tested this out. by dansan · · Score: 0

    A couple days ago (I believe it was Thursday last week) attempted to send an email to a hotmail account from gmail. This email got put in the 'junk mail' folder of this person. We did it again just for kicks... and yeap.

    I was very disappointed, and I thought that it might have just been a fluke, but I guess I was not the only one to notice.

    I have read a lot of replies here that clain the post was a fluke... I think they didn't have a change to see it themselves.

    --
    The shortest distance between to points is a chord.
  189. Let's do this again! by UnknownQ · · Score: 1

    I got five gmail invites for the first five people to respond to this comment! (Please include first/last name and email for the form)

    --
    Wherever you go, there you are!
    1. Re:Let's do this again! by Greenfday6 · · Score: 1

      look im replying

    2. Re:Let's do this again! by splint3r · · Score: 1

      Me me me! Afraz Ahmadzadeh (address is above).

    3. Re:Let's do this again! by conradp · · Score: 1

      Ooh, ooh, please pick me, pick me! I'd like to try this out.

      Name: Conrad Poelman
      I set up an email address just for this:
      username is cpgmail, domain is stellarscience.com
      Put the two together with '@'. Thanks.

      --
      "To be absolutely certain about something, one must know everything or nothing about it." -- Olin Miller
    4. Re:Let's do this again! by traylorpa · · Score: 1

      Park Traylor traylorpa@comcast.net THANKS!

    5. Re:Let's do this again! by xenoxion · · Score: 1

      Please invite me....

      venesectrix139(at)yahoo.com

    6. Re:Let's do this again! by xenoxion · · Score: 1

      Crap, I forgot to include my name... how typical of me :p

      Michael Lapadula, again my e-mail is venesectrix139(at)yahoo.com

    7. Re:Let's do this again! by mkarpinski · · Score: 1

      Still available?

      Michael Karpinski

      mkarpinski @ mac . com

      --
      As below, so above and beyond, I imagine drawn beyond the lines of reason. Push the envelope. Watch it bend.
    8. Re:Let's do this again! by UnknownQ · · Score: 1

      Gave this guy the last one (lots came through email)
      Please play again soon!

      --
      Wherever you go, there you are!
  190. Maybe... by Ipingforpong · · Score: 1

    They sent the e-mail in Klingon?
    4. Is Gmail available in other Languages?
    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/help/abo ut.html#sign up

  191. This is a Lie by gazoombo · · Score: 1

    I had a couple days ago. I was able to receive a gmail invite just fine.
    I was also able to send an e-mail to a friend who still uses hotmail from my new gmail account.

    --
    John Hancock
  192. The real reason hotmail is losing these invites... by mojumbo · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...and lots of other mail...

    I got this in reply to my queries to msn/hotmail
    about frequent failed delivery of messages to
    their servers:

    From: "J**** H****"
    To: "Phil Dier"
    Subject: RE: Problems with failed delivery
    Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 16:10:11 -0700

    Hello,

    In the last couple of weeks, MSN Hotmail was experiencing an unusually
    heavy volume of incoming mail and this has placed us in the condition of
    having our incoming mail servers temporarily saturated with incoming
    connections. I would suggest that you make sure that your system is
    trying to make connections to more than one IP at a time, that it
    rotates connections between different IPs in our MX record, and that you
    use persistent connections when you do connect. Many domains will
    suspect a server of being a spammer if they stay connected beyond, say,
    50 RSET commands, but our system does not do that. We encourage
    unlimited RSETs for efficiency's sake.

    Our experience shows that the condition will abate sometime around 7 pm
    Pacific, so your queues should begin draining at that time, especially
    if you follow the recommendations above.

    I wish there was something I could tell you for sure but we don't know
    what is causing this or when it will clear up.

    Sincerely,

    J****, MSN Hotmail

  193. confirmation by jasong911 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had 2 invites this morning on my Hotmail addy, the first I pounced on, the second I left in the Bulk folder. 2 hours later the second invite is gone from the Bulk folder. Very suspicious.

  194. Re:Vast majority of people don't want a 'GMAIL INV by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    If he was a real friend, he wouldn't have made me stand on my head a squeal like a monkey to get my gmail addy!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  195. Yahoo SpamGuard send invites to spam folder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen this on 2 different Yahoo accounts. Gmail invites to Yahoo accounts get automatically sent to the Bulk Mail (Spam) folder and do not appear on the new mail notification showing # of unread messages. Luckily I have little spam on this account otherwise the invite would have been buried and automatically deleted after x days.

  196. NOT true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least not fully. I have a GMail account. I sent a friend a message at Hotmail. I got a reply this morning from that Hotmail account.

  197. Re:Confirmed: False. by Temporal · · Score: 1

    In my experience, any sort of automatically-generated e-mail will fail spam filters. Yahoo marks GMail invites as spam. That may seem suspicious, until you realize that it also marks Orkut invites as spam. Yahoo has no reason to censor Orkut, as far as I can tell. Also, I once purchased a copy of Trillian Pro for a friend, and his e-mail server filtered the e-mail containing his membership info (simply deleted it outright with no trace). It then proceded to filter several "Send me a new password" e-mails, until finally we managed to intercept one.

    This is just another reason why I hate spam filters. Filters are not the way to fix spam. We really need to overhaul the entire e-mail system.

  198. I'm not hating, I'm just pointing out facts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, GMail doesn't send you spam. It has a text banner on the side of the message, somewhat like those "Ads By Google" banners, that shows ads with keywords matching the mail you're reading. No advertising messages show up in your inbox or anything like that.

    It's more similar to the "Sponsored Links" on the side of a Google search than spam.

    1. Re:I'm not hating, I'm just pointing out facts... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing out my error. I guess the service is a little more tolerable than I thought.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  199. I'm waiting... by micolous · · Score: 1

    ...for a mass mailing worm to come out, disguising itself as a Gmail invite. Or some scam. Seeing as they're in great demand and people will do anything to get one. Including writing their email address in plain text on a website that is undoubtly a goldmine for spambots.

    --
    SSdtIGFzIGJvcmVkIGFzIHlvdSBhcmUK
  200. Here's what I tried... by kzinti · · Score: 1

    I tried sending test messages from my gmail account to my hotmail and yahoo accounts. I then created a mockup invitation using the text suggested in the "Talent Show" blog, and sent it to both accounts. The results:

    Hotmail: both the short test message and the invitation were received normally. Neither bounced, neither was shunted into the junk mail folder.

    Yahoo: the test message was received normally, but the mock invitation was dropped into the Bulk e-mail folder. (In fact, yahoo created a Bulk folder for me - I didn't previously have one because this e-mail account was previously unused and in hibernation.)

    So, of the various claims made in this story, I can verify only the one about invitations sent to Yahoo.

  201. ORKUT blocked too? by dindi · · Score: 1

    While My friends are very open to all new web stuff, I noticed, that no one accepted my orkut invitation from hotmail...

    Actually someone told, they never got my invitation.

    Anyone knows if hotmail is blocking ourkut too ?
    Due to privacy issues I am not willing to open anything with MSN/HOtMAIL/M$, and none of my friends are using that spamhole service anymore ..

  202. Gmail Invites by Teh_Expert · · Score: 1

    Wish I had thought of the requesting of a gmail invite for empirical evidence idea. Very nice.

  203. Count Mozilla in on the anti-Gmail conspiracy... by JamieF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    because I got an invite yesterday and Mozilla's Junk Mail filter tagged it as spam.

    SpamAssassin didn't, though, which proves that those scheming bastards obviously rigged Mozilla 1.7 so that it would filter gmail invitations. There's no other explanation, right?

    It couldn't be because the invitation email looks a lot like spam...?

    Nah.

  204. It's hard for a Gmail Invite not to look "spammy" by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    It's very hard for a GMail invite not to look spammy!

    It contains a small amount of text, two links, and words like:

    • free
    • ads
    • click, copy, paste
    • Enjoy
    • offers
    • invitation
    I'd be disappointed if my email provider's spam blocker DIDN'T put this in my suspect list!
  205. Confirmed Hogwash by ad0gg · · Score: 1

    Went to GMail Swap. Offered pictures of my rack, and boom I had invites in my hotmail email account. Can't believe people are so interested in my rack, i mean its just a bunch of computers.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  206. moo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    justletmelogon@yahoo.com if there's any left...

  207. the secret to getting gmail invites by grahagre · · Score: 0

    thats strange. but anyways, for the users who have a gmail account: i've been leaving my gmail inbox browser window open for long periods of time and i've noticed that that google bot keeps hitting my website frequently. This is aparently how they measure how long and frequetly they measure how often you use your account, and such. And, that in turn determines how often you get offered invites to be given away. look at my stats page here and notice how many bot hits i get from google. coincidence? i think not... ;-P

  208. It works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hotmail didn't block my gmail invitation to a friend at Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:50:54 -0400.

    Maybe they started blocking gmail invitations after that date, or maybe this is just a rumor?

    (No, I'm not working for M$; I don't even use Windows as my primary OS)

  209. Mine came through by AzureLunatic · · Score: 1

    I got sent a Gmail invitation to a Yahoo account. It showed up in my inbox, not the Bulk folder.

  210. Why I use hotmail by dbcad7 · · Score: 1
    The only reason I use it, is because of the Messenger tie-in. I absouletly hate the ads on hotmail, but live with it for messenger. I hope google does their own messenger like service, and then they will really be cookin with gas.

    I know there are other messengers (actualy I use amsn on mandrake) and perhaps I should get back to the old ICQ days and put whatever email account I want into my messenger. I think that what led me to the MSN/hotmail thing was that I didn't get unsolicited messages with it like ICQ.

    regards

    dbcad7

    --
    waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  211. I don't see the big deal. by Konrad9 · · Score: 1

    Oooooh wow, 1 gig. It's nothing special. It's not like I login and have an orgasm over the greatness... Seriously though, if you read this, fire off some e-mails at me and I'll respond, see if it gets through, etc.

  212. It looks liek thats cleared up... by soulhuntre · · Score: 1

    Now, while we are at it, can someone send an invite to soulhuntre@soulhuntre.com ?

    C'mon, you know you have one to spare!

    Thanks :)

    --
    --> Fight tyranny and repression.... read /. at -1!
  213. Privacy - yeah right by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As if hotmail and yahoo are in any position to point the finger at anyone for privacy issues!

    1. Re:Privacy - yeah right by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Bulk Mail filters *surely* don't read the content of any messages and aggregate the results for later analysis, right? ;)

  214. Re: For me??? by mindseye1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just to let you know, it was my birthday just a couple days ago. In case any of you had forgotten to get me something, I have a GOOD suggestion!
    It's cheap
    It's fun
    It's timeless
    It's a Gmail invitation!!! Yeah!

    ryankelley at comcast dot net
    if yer feelin generous!

  215. Easy answer to changing ISP's, jobs by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

    > [insert tired 1997 reasoning for using crappy "free e-mail" service]

    The easy answer is to get one's own domain.

    That you CAN keep forever, and $8/year is WORTH not having to worry about tiny mailbox size, those damn little ads that go on every outbound message, and *ahem* not having to go to a bloated, ad-filled web-interface just to check your e-mail even when you're at home on your own computer!!

    I say 1997 reasoning because it wasn't a value for most people to do that kind of thing back when a domain cost maybe $25 or $30 a year just for the registration. But I pay $8/year for the domain and $49/year for "1gbhosting.com" which provides 1GB of webspace/mailbox space and unlimited IMAP/POP accounts. For the average newbie, however, a cheap solution can be found with a few minutes' research: Domain, $8 (GoDaddy). E-mail forwarding: Free. Forward to you@isp-of-the-month.com and voila. Instant, non-sucky, POP/IMAP account that not onl is completely personalized, but also doesn't serve as a billboard for some asshole company every time you give it out: Priceless.

    1. Re:Easy answer to changing ISP's, jobs by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha, you were the original one that was trying to sound like everyone else is an idiot, because "if they just pay enough attention to know who's offering it (real ISP, college, job)"
      Now you are saying that you need to buy a domain?

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    2. Re:Easy answer to changing ISP's, jobs by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      My original point was that the email hosting itself is available to everyone (and if it's not you need to switch ISPs).

      I clarified in the grandparent, that if you also want a persistent e-mail address, you can get that too by buying a domain (which costs $8 per year and takes five minutes to buy + three days to go live--why are you trying to make it sound like a big deal?)

  216. GMail Invites Galore by valmont · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Peek at my post history for more info, but I've still got a few to hand out and I'm getting more every day.

    i still ain't ebaying'em.

    1. Re:GMail Invites Galore by xenoxion · · Score: 1

      Please invite me, you would be my god if I could finally upgrade from yahoo's crappy flash ads. My e-mail is venesectrix139(at)yahoo.com.

  217. yahoo does put gmail invite into spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but luckily I looked in my spam folder and saw it. I knew I was getting an invite, so I looked there to make sure. Now I'm migrating all my yahoo mail stuff to GMail. GMail rocks and the label features is very nice.

  218. Hotmail isn't blocking Gmail.com/invites by evilpaul13 · · Score: 1

    As of 6/21/2004 at 1 PM EST, Hotmail isn't blocking gmail invites. (Or emails from gmail.com.) I got an invite and a confirmation today at that time.

  219. Re:Confirmed: False. by jeeten · · Score: 1

    i'm using hotmail for the past 5 yrs. I would love to join the GMAIL exculisive..... Any invitations PLEASE.

  220. no really big problems by shizke · · Score: 0

    i sent one invite to a friend using Yahoo, and he got it in his bulk mail folder...right before he almost deleted the invite. i also sent another invite to another person using hotmail, and they got it no problem. perhaps hotmail is just now getting rid of Gmail invites.

  221. Nice logic by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

    I think I might set my sig to be:

    "386 assembler code ought to be enough for anyone -- Linus Torvalds"

    and we'll see how long Linus goes without denying it! If he waits long enough, then we can take it to be true :-)

    1. Re:Nice logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I might set my sig to be:

      "386 assembler code ought to be enough for anyone -- Linus Torvalds"

      and we'll see how long Linus goes without denying it! If he waits long enough, then we can take it to be true :-)


      Go ahead, knowingly forge a quote. If it is seen widely like the 640k quote, then I'm sure Linus will either refute it or disregard you entirely.

    2. Re:Nice logic by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      So if he disregards it completely, then we can assume it's true, I guess.

  222. anyone still using hotmail? by -O.ster_66 · · Score: 1
    and if so, why?

    i admit i still hang onto it because of IM friends/family (just as i have an AIM account as well). but i hate it. any opinions?

    i um...yahoo.

    --
    "You get all the fun of sitting still, being quiet, writing down numbers, paying attention...science has it all."
    1. Re:anyone still using hotmail? by Greenfday6 · · Score: 1

      I Don't Yahoo... i have a yahoo account but don't use it. I also have a Lycos account that i use more... i thought they were suppose to be jacking up storage... any i use Msn as my main email cause msn is my isp... well i did use msn until i got gmail.... hell ya

  223. Altavista? by Kludge · · Score: 1

    However, you CAN keep one of these "second-rate" email addresses indefinitely.

    That's what I thought too. Then one of the services started charging and the other one (altavista) stopped offering it altogether. Doh!

    I bought a domain that I can move from ISP to ISP. That is how you keep your email address the same.

  224. Hotmail Reply by Fissional · · Score: 1

    I got invited to and did sign up for a gmail account, and of course emailed all of my contacts notifying them of the change. I got a reply from one of my contacts who uses hotmail. it said Re:(subject i put), so I know she got it and read it and just replied to it. Maybe hotmail is only blocking gmail Invites? I know the article specifically said gmail and invites but, from my experiance, my emails from the gmail account are getting through. This was just this morning by the way. just thought i'd mention

  225. Where do you think you're going today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I work for E3. When anyone tells me that they didnt
    get their email confirmation for E3 registration I
    have to look to see if they are HotMail or MSN users, and if they are I have to instruct them on
    how to get their confirmations (required to attend) out of the bulk mail folder.

    Clearly Microsoft doesnt want anyone attending if they dont make money from it. (Even tho they exhibit at the expo.)

  226. Send the invite to yourself by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Send the gmail invite to yourself. Then, you can take the text and paste it anywhere. Send it inside a word doc, an attachment. Anything.

    All people need to activate a Gmail account is the URL. It dosn't actualy have to go through the email system.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  227. Hotmail blocked? Not. by radius.god · · Score: 1

    I invited people with hotmail addresses today. Worked great.

  228. Actually... by adiposity · · Score: 1

    This would be more like your apartment complex putting a "No Solicitors" sign on the gate outside. Oh, and this apartment complex is small and cramped, but it's free to live there.

    -Dan

  229. I want a Gmail account!...Please? by rjm705 · · Score: 1

    rjmNOSPAM705@mail.usask.ca if you have an invite to give to a lowly emailer.

  230. hotmail issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hotmail, "msn", and yahoo all seem to randomly eat emails I send to them, gmail or otherwise.

  231. I just got an interesting GMAIL bounce! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1

    Technical details of failure:
    PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 7): 554 HELO/EHLO: Unable to verify that you are mproxy.gmail.com

    ----- Original message -----

  232. Care to cite? by bonch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know this is Slashdot, where random blog posts are submitted and become fact simply because they bash Microsoft in some way (even though it's turned out that it's completely false), but do you care to cite who this mysterious, unnamed "third-party" is?

    I get e-mail about Linux all the time, and it's never, ever sent to the Junk Mail folder. It's cool to pull random facts out of our asses, but perhaps we should take the time to step back and see how foolish it makes this community look? This article is completely false, and it's hilarious to see all the people giving their prepared lectures "Well, what would you expect from Microsoft? Blah blah blah."

  233. Haha...listen to yourself by bonch · · Score: 1

    The article is completely false, pal. You just lectured Microsoft for absolutely nothing. Who needs to "save face" now?

    This is exactly why so many people are unhappy with Slashdot now. It's gotten to the point where complete falsehoods are posted willy-nilly to the front page where it gets hundreds of thousands of hits, and everyone prepares their Microsoft-bash speeches.

  234. I wouldn't mind one. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    If you're feeling generous, send me one at starkruzr@starCANNEDMEATkruzr.com, minus the spam. Thank you! And if you need anything (though I don't know what I can give you), just ask.

    --

    +++ATH0
  235. That would be sweet by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

    eric512@earthlink.net if anyone out there is feeling generous. Thanks for your time in advance.

  236. I can send mail from gmail to hotmail fine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I just tried this with two messages, and both were delivered very quickly (in less than a minute).

    Don't have a yahoo account to test with.

  237. check your e-mail by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

    check your e-mail

    1. Re:check your e-mail by xenoxion · · Score: 1

      By any chance would you be willing to give away another invite to a total stranger? :)

    2. Re:check your e-mail by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Check YOUR email.

    3. Re:check your e-mail by rjm705 · · Score: 1

      I didn't actually get the invite in my inbox. Could you re-send it? Thank you.

  238. Me too! Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by mr_walrus · · Score: 1

    please invite
    walrus-to-dinner@kitwat.dhs.org

    thanks!

  239. Invite Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey can you invite me ?
    My email = paperc0p@yahoo.com

  240. Why ISPs are blocking GMail invites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen gmail invite threads on forums and first thing that came to my mind: potential abuse for spam e-mail collection.

    So, I am not surprised that ISPs are blocking GMail invites. I could be a spammer and send out fake invites in order to collect "valid" e-mail addresses.

    Mike
    HKSS.com

  241. My Invite was blanked out today by redrumsquad · · Score: 2, Informative

    My brother sent me a g-mail invite this morning to my hotmail account. When sending an invite gmail prompts you for a personalized message. Well my brother called me on the phone to let me know he sent the invite. I found it in my bulk mail folder, with everything but his personal message blanked out. The invite was essentially deleted. He had to send it to my Rediff account (the original 1 gig free email). So it's not a BS story

  242. Re:MS & Google (and Quicktime and DR-DOS...) by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    and the reason wasn't hard to understand
    If that were the reason then the incompatibility would have clearly documented and it wouldn't have just looked like DR-DOS was broken when it was Windows that was rigged.
  243. Stunning [not so] by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "An email service blocking emails from a competing email service is surprising. Has this ever happened before? Is this even legal?"

    Well, it's their service. Their server space. Their terms and conditions you agreed to. Unless it's in your EULA somewhere that they must deliver 100% of your email, then I'd say it sure as shootin is. One companies invite is another companies spam, by their definition of spam, of course. Too many loopholes here to be mentioned

    I know it's unheard of, but don't wait for the law-- Vote with your feet. It's why I got my own domain and email service years ago.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  244. Hotmail randomly loses email all the time by majid · · Score: 1

    Not just email specifically from Gmail.

    AOL and Yahoo are even worse.

    All ISPs know about how regularly the big free email providers (or worse, paid for service in the case of AOL) go down all the time, causing backu-ups for the ISPs' mail servers and headaches for sysadmine.

    Remember Hanlon's razor: never ascribe to malice what can be better explained by incompetence.

  245. Slashbot editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is a fucking load of shit. I'd normally expect this shit from that fucking fag nigger michael sims but i can see that complete and utter laziness is infectious among these obviously overworked slashfuck editors.

    At least fucking check on the stories you fucking FAGGOTS!

  246. isn't gmail "bulk mail?" by 3rdParty · · Score: 1

    Spam is spam, no matter if it comes from Yahoo, Hotmail, or Google. Personally, I could care less if I missed out on "The greatest innovation of our time!" I am perfectly willing to be the only kid on the block without gmail - no skin off my nose since I don't need what they are offering. Keep it out of my inbox, please.

  247. Wasn't a problem for me by awful · · Score: 1

    I invited a friend who has a Hotmail account to join Google. They signed up with no problems.

  248. WILL YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP??!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the GODDAMN comments!!! We all know the story is bullshit!!!

    NOW STFU !!!!!!!!!!!

  249. I'm confused... by Altanar · · Score: 1

    I signed up for Gmail two days ago. The invitation went through fine to my Hotmail account. Is this actually happening or is it just an email fluke?

  250. SHUT UP!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STFU!!!

  251. paid hotmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case nobody has mentionid it thus far, some people PAY for extra storage and the privilege of not having your hotmail account dissapear if you don't log on for 30 days. Those people are getting shafted just as much as the "free" hotmail users.

    I still have a paid account with them, though I am slowly migrating of of it to my own domain based email address.

    So in essence, anyone paying for yahoo/hotmail IS having emails intentionally blocked by a paid email hosting service.

  252. Hotmail spam filters by abertoll · · Score: 1

    I don't know how hotmail decides what is spam or not, but I've been under the impression that if enough people say "this is spam" it starts to become spam for you as well. In other words, there IS some sharing of spam filters/rules isn't there?

    --
    "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
  253. Anyone wanna let me in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone wanna let me into gmail?...
    alo41490@yahoo.com

  254. One little detail I haven't seen mentioned... by Lazyhound · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...e-mails sent to Hotmail accounts tend to "disappear" at the best of times. I work at a call center*, and I get frequent call-backs from people using Hotmail who never received e-mails sent to them, despite it being registered as sent in our systems; others have mentioned receiving mail 2+ hours after it was sent. I doubt this is anything more sinister than shoddy service on Microsoft's part.

    *Pity can be expressed with GMail invite to lazyhound2@hotmail.com.

  255. yahoo put mine in the bulk email folder by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

    I just got a gmail invite today sent to yahoo and they put it in the bulk mail folder. Thanks to this article, otherwise I would not have thought to look there for it so quickly.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  256. Free Gmail by Greenfday6 · · Score: 1

    As everyone know Kevin Rose is one of the People behing the gmail machine... so i have put together a file that is double ziped and password protected for everyone to crack. inside is a nice shiney new gmail account...
    http://www.clanfake.com/forums/showthr ead.php?s=&p ostid=3275#post3275

    have fun

  257. Shameless begging by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    I saw this thread, so I checked my hotmail account stephen_b6@hotmail.com and there were no gmail invites. I wrote to Gmail, and told them what I read on Slashdot. They said I didn't get one because I have to have a friend send me one.
    A friend? What part of reading Slashdot didn't they understand?

    Will someone send me one so I can be cool and popular?

  258. Did they read the Gmail invite to block it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you block an email without reading it?

  259. test results by sweet+reason · · Score: 1

    i just sent a test message (not an invite) from my gmail account to my hotmail and yahoo accounts.
    yahoo put it in my inbox.
    hotmail put it in my junk folder.

    an identical email from my pobox account went to my inbox at each site.

    --
    Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- A.E.
  260. Re:MS & Google (and Quicktime and DR-DOS...) by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    It wasn't that there was an incompatibility. (Might be, might not be.) It was that Win 3.1 beta users were only supposed to be running it over MSDOS. Any errors they reported or technical support they required would be a waste of Microsoft's time since they were using an unsupported platform.

    The error message did suck:

    Non-fatal error detected: Error number [varied].
    Please contact Windows 3.1 beta support.
    Press enter to exit or C to continue.
    Something like "Unsupported OS detected. Proceed at own risk (Y/N)?" might have been better. In any event, that code was turned off in the shipping version of Win 3.1.
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  261. It worked by adiposity · · Score: 1

    I got the invite on hotmail. Don't know what the main post is talking about.

    Thanks, Ben!

    -Dan

  262. Re:MS & Google (and Quicktime and DR-DOS...) by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    If it was always going to be designed to run on OSes other than MS', why would you restrict beta users (who are supposed to find problems) to only MS' OS?

  263. Re:MS & Google (and Quicktime and DR-DOS...) by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    It wasn't designed to run on other OSs and Microsoft didn't promise that it would. DRDOS mimicked MSDOS well enough to run it. Microsoft was under no obligation to insure that Win 3.1 would run over DRDOS. The question is did Microsoft deliberately make a commercial shipping version incompatible? Quite likely, but not in that case. They've done so many scuzzy things that there's no point in inventing more.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  264. Curious about how university treats Gmail by cghancock01 · · Score: 1

    I would be interested in seeing how my university's spam filters treat an invitation to Gmail. I'll also send some messages from the Gmail account to my university account to see if the filters pick out anything in there. The university's mail server assigns a number to every e-mail I get according to it's "spammyness" and I also use a filter in Eudora. Neither of them will prevent me from getting the e-mail, but I would like to see what the two analyses of the e-mail turn up. Perhaps the invite is inherently "spammy" looking. So, if anyone out there has an extra invitation they wouldn't mind contributing to my curiousity, I would greatly appreciate it. I'll post the output from the filters. Thanks! caseyh atnospam clemson dot edu

  265. Re:4 Gmail invites to give away by cghancock01 · · Score: 1

    I would love to have one of these Gmail invites you speak of. I guess I don't have that many friends now that I think of it. What's your cat's e-mail address? Anyway, if anyone out there would be so kind, I would love it if you'd send an invite to caseyh atnospam clemson dot edu. See my other post http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=111775&thresho ld=-1&commentsort=0&tid=217&mode=thread&cid=949167 3

  266. Re:MS & Google (and Quicktime and DR-DOS...) by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    I'm not inventing this. Compatibility isn't MS' problem, I agree, it's up to the DR-DOS people, or anyone else that wants to make an MS-DOS compatible OS. However, purposely crippling your own product so that it's incompatible with a competitor's product that it would otherwise work with is low. And it's illegal if you're a monopoly.

    Also, your distinction between release version and beta version is not approriate given that reports of compatibility problems even at the beta stage can adversely affect a product.

  267. Busted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post is BUSTED.
    So are your two email addresses;)

  268. Hotmail is blocking gmail, but not yahoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I just try with my gmail account.

    mails from gmail can reach yahoo inbox instantly, but not hotmail.

  269. gmail rules by jasoniscool · · Score: 1

    please hook me up with a gmail invite =]

    my email is jasonatjasoniscool.net

    anyways i hope gmail becomes the standard email for people, because i trust google (they actually have ethics) whereas a lot of these other companies dont.

  270. My thoughts. by Cow007 · · Score: 1

    I am partial to the term "celestial bit bucket' And thats my 2 cents.

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  271. Embedded Images by Myrmi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing that GMail appears unable to do is to show images that are embedded into the email. That's a bit of a poor show, in my book :/. I'm not talking about remotely linked images, either (which you can show at the click of a link), but images that are sent in the email itself.

    --
    "I think everyone is an agnostic but just doesn't know" - Frazz
  272. not surprising: Yahoo/Hotmail scared of gmail by hinki · · Score: 1

    it's kinda flimsy (and funny) how yahoo/hotmail only up their storage by a small fraction (100MB for yahoo 25 flimsy MB for hotmail). Doesn't look like they can afford 1GB. They're just jealous and scared that they'll lose a lot of people to gmail (which is inevitable), so it doesn't surprise me that they're trying to be tricky about it. PS could someone be kind enough to send me an invite please? ichuprovATexemail.com.au

    --
    As science struggles on to try to explain.
    Oxytoxins flowing ever in to my brain.
  273. Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't about other people but i was able to get a gmail invite into my hotmail inbox.

  274. Re:GMail reads your mail for you! by rush22 · · Score: 1

    That's right, GMail reads your incoming mail and decides what sort of advertising you would like.

    From epic.org

    "California Attorney General Bill Lockyer has acknowledged a letter sent by EPIC, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, and World Privacy Forum that argued that Google's Gmail service violates the State's strict wiretapping laws. Lockyer wrote (pdf): "The potential exposure of Gmail users to liability for violation of Penal Code section 631 is of particular concern, as are the rights of those who are not subscribers to Gmail but who send e-mail to those who are." Lockyer advised that his office will continue to analyze Gmail and that "I understand your position and share many of your concerns."

    (excerpt from the letter)

    "IV. It Is Imperative That Google Suspend Gmail Because Users of the Service Could be Civilly and Criminally Liable Under Cal. Pen. Code 631(a)

    Section 631(a) specifies that any person who "cause[s] to be done any of the acts or things mentioned above in this section, is punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($ 2,500), or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison, or by both a fine and imprisonment in the county jail or in the state prison." Accordingly, if Google's Gmail violates 631, its users could also be held liable. Private individuals harmed by Gmail users could bring suit under 637.2, which contains a liquidated damages provision of $5,000 per violation."

  275. Re:Criminal and Civil Liability by rush22 · · Score: 1

    Methinks ISPs are using "Privacy Concerns" as a way of keeping customers from leaving their quickly aging service. "Hey look, bearded technology pundits with nothing better to do are upset about ads in a radical new free email service. They're waving the privacy flag. We can wave the same flag and lock people in to viewing our contextually inaccurate ads a little bit longer!"

    Hi. If it is determined the Google is in violation of 631 of the California Penal Code, users of GMail could be liable for a fine of up to $2,500 or one year in prison. Additionally, private individuals could bring a civil suit of up to $5,000 . In other words, if I send you a "g-mail", believing it to be private, and Google reads that mail, I could sue you for $5,000 and you could go to jail.

    How's that for privacy concerns?! These laws are on the books, it is just a matter of determining if GMail violates these laws. www.epic.org

  276. Re:Criminal and Civil Liability by rush22 · · Score: 1

    From epic.org

    "California Attorney General Bill Lockyer has acknowledged a letter sent by EPIC, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, and World Privacy Forum that argued that Google's Gmail service violates the State's strict wiretapping laws. Lockyer wrote (pdf): "The potential exposure of Gmail users to liability for violation of Penal Code section 631 is of particular concern, as are the rights of those who are not subscribers to Gmail but who send e-mail to those who are." Lockyer advised that his office will continue to analyze Gmail and that "I understand your position and share many of your concerns."

    (excerpt from the letter)

    "IV. It Is Imperative That Google Suspend Gmail Because Users of the Service Could be Civilly and Criminally Liable Under Cal. Pen. Code 631(a)

    Section 631(a) specifies that any person who "cause[s] to be done any of the acts or things mentioned above in this section, is punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($ 2,500), or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison, or by both a fine and imprisonment in the county jail or in the state prison." Accordingly, if Google's Gmail violates 631, its users could also be held liable. Private individuals harmed by Gmail users could bring suit under 637.2, which contains a liquidated damages provision of $5,000 per violation."

    (and yes I posted something similar under the same heading, but I'm posting it again because there's almost 800 messages and none of them even mention this issue!!)

  277. Re:Criminal and Civil Liability by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    Related to gmail itself and not the users so much (though who's actually held accountable for their own actions anymore?):

    Federal law, and I'm paraphrasing, permits private ISPs to read users' email for performance monitoring reasons, etc. Right now, gMail is a private ISP, as it's open on the basis of invitation only, and they're granted much more freedom by federal laws. When/if they become a public service provider - which doesn't mean free - they fall under more stringent rules. In both cases, though, the eMail isn't exclusive property of the sender, but shared by the recipient *and* the sender. If someone sends me email, and I read it to my coworkers, it doesn't matter that the sender is damaged. Once I've read the message and left it on the server, it's also contained on a "remote storage device". While I may personally be liable for leaking the information, Google has no liability for treating my message (whether someone in CA sent it to me or not) just like any other message that they can legally monitor for performance reasons, etc.

    Anyway, all the laws in the world mean jack squat when you sign the form that says "I grant Google et. al. rights to read my email. In exchange I'll use their email service." People can sign away their "rights" if they want to.

    Good reading on this topic:
    http://www.cybercrime.gov/s&smanual2002.htm#_I II_
    http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/1030_anal .html

  278. Re:Criminal and Civil Liability by rush22 · · Score: 1

    Ah, but I didn't sign away my rights did I? If I send you an e-mail and Google reads it, then I might be able to sue you (at least that is the impression I get), and you might get prison time. Also, Google is not "monitoring" it is "reading" quite a gigantically huge difference. It is the difference between the phone company making sure your lines are in working order, and listening in on your conversation. You wouldn't stand for that would you? Google is even worse than that sort of thing. Google is not only listening in on your conversation, but is then apparently going ahead and selling the sorted information it gathers to third parties!!

    If I write you an e-mail that says "Don't tell anyone, but I like butt-sex. This message is confidential" 50 times, and then I later I get an e-mail from another party that says "Rush22 How about some buttlove! We know you love it!" Then I obviously could sue you. Someone now knows I love butt-sex, which is essentially the same as you telling them. Note that it does not even matter who I send this e-mail too. I could send it 50 times to anyone, or everyone, and sue each and every user on Google for the maximum $5,000. woot I'm going to be rich!

    Anyway, I don't entirely understand it, but the lawyers at EPIC must understand it, and the Attorney General of California thinks it is a big concern, so unless you are a lawyer too, then you can't completely dismiss it.

  279. Re:Criminal and Civil Liability by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    The phone company comparison doesn't work, as voice communications are governed by completely different laws than data communications. Note, BTW, that VOIP is considered data and not voice.

    I did quite a bit of research on this a few months ago when involved in a bit of a flamewar - that's when most of my in-depth research happens :) - and google is currently completely within their rights to voluntarily disclose information (including your full messages) to any public or private entity that they choose. This is because they're a private service provider as it stands right now.

    Using me specifically as an example also wouldn't work, as I'm not only a user but also a private service provider whose service includes remote storage. So, if you send me a message, I can disclose it to anyone I want when I'm wearing my ISP hat, and you can't stop me unless I cause you "significant financial damages", which is something unlikely to come from everyone knowing about your love of butt sex. :) Someone else, however, may not be a service provider, and may not have the privledge. You might get somemoney out of them - though sending a message with "this is confidential" doesn't constitute a "meeting of minds" and therefore isn't really a binding contract. The recipient may disagree but still get the message.

    There's not much legal expectation of privacy with email, basically. Then again, CA is sort of their own little country with their own inane legal system, so they can probably do whatever they want - including making stupid laws that infringe on my ability to have a nifty free gmail account. :(

  280. Re:Criminal and Civil Liability by technobro · · Score: 1

    Actually I was under the impression that GMail only advertized on outgoing email...

  281. For the record by maotx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've noticed a few other things weird about yahoo and its infamous bulk folder. For about a week and a half now my /. subscription has been placed their instead of my inbox. I had to use a filter to prevent its misdirection.

    --
    I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
  282. Re:Criminal and Civil Liability by rush22 · · Score: 1

    Well, I don't know about you, but I've thought very hard about what privacy is and why I think it should be considered extremely important in this day and age. My information is my property and I will fight tooth and nail to make sure noone I don't want seeing it gets their money-grabbing propaganda-spewing indoctrinating hands on it. I'd suggest everyone else does the same, but.... que sera sera. sigh.

  283. Re:Criminal and Civil Liability by rush22 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I think you're right. Google says it does not sell information to third parties, and only uses the information for the GMail account holder.

    Gmail and Privacy

  284. my invites got there by wokie78 · · Score: 1

    i distributed my share of invites yesterday, all of them to hotmail accounts and every single one got there. i wouldnt have sended them if this article had appeared yesterday, but i did and all of my friends are happy with their new gmail accounts now. none of us have e-mailed to the hotmail account anymore but we'll probably try that. anyways hotmail did work for me, at least this time

  285. And you claim you're not a troll? Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ah, the random .sig troll (i.e., you) strikes again:
    Sorry, liberals, Fox News is centrist according to a UCLA/Stanford study
    Yeah, and we all know that UCLA and Stanford are the epitome of liberal thought. They couldn't possibly be biased! But then again, I guess by your (and UCLA's and Stanford's) definition "centrist" means being slanted towards the right. I suppose, by that logic, that you also think that GWB is also a centrist?

    Idiot.
    1. Re:And you claim you're not a troll? Uh by bonch · · Score: 1

      I love how you disregard a factual study because it contradicts your opinion. What a way to bolster your argument.

      "Yeah, that's not true! You're just an idiot!"

  286. Re:Criminal and Civil Liability by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    I never said that I agree with any of those laws - I do, in fact, actively vote against anyone who tries to reduce my privacy. Even if they hide the privacy invasions behind names like "Patriot Act" or "Ronald Regan Memorial Social Bill", etc. I also strive to provide as much privacy as possible for my userbase, both at work and at home. Unfortunately, that doesn't change what the current laws say. :(

    BTW, I wish one of the presidential cantidates was actually against the Patriot act... Damn it.

  287. Google blocking gmail? by Scryer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't been able to log into gmail for the last few hours (Server Error / The server encountered a temporary error and could not complete your request. / Please try again in 30 seconds. ) and ordinarily this wouldn't set off any alarms. After all, it is a beta service.

    However, I checked in on Orkut, a Google-provided networking/community bulletin board site, and did a search in "Communities" for "gmail". Yesterday this returned dozens of groups, and at the moment it returns none. Other groups appear to be perfectly operational.

    Is it a coincidence that Orkut gmail-related communities disappeared at the same time as Gmail did?

  288. Er by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I love how you disregard a factual study because it contradicts your opinion.
    I read the damn thing, and I couldn't find a single citation to support your bald assertion. Way to bolster your argument there, guy.

    And it doesn't change the fact that you're an idiot.
  289. Gmail and privacy by seas85 · · Score: 1

    Google have given me 7 free accounts of one GB each, I don't give a rats ass if their server is parsing my emails to make the small text ads relevant. Every byte you send over the internet is parsed and investigated anyway by ISP and other service providers. I would rather have googles servers give me a heart transplant, than to have some shitty micro$oft employee have access to my email.

  290. Re:heh, true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and this kind of post is the reasn i have flaimbait posts modded to +5. offensive to some idiot, but an interesting question of the usefullness of slashdot. something to think about.