Slashdot Mirror


How To Avoid Viruses At Windows Install Time?

reallocate writes "Can a home user install and update Windows without being attacked by a virus or worm? I'm a Linux user; have been since 1995. Recently, I needed to install Windows XP Pro on a home desktop machine with a Roadrunner cable connection. I tried twice. Both times, the machine was attacked and rendered unusable before I was able to pull down the first update from Windows Update." Read on for more details of what went wrong and when.

Here's a synopsis of my install method:

  1. Put the Windows XP CD in the drive;
  2. Disconnect the cable modem from the network card;
  3. Reboot and install Windows;
  4. The box remains off the net during the entire install: no registering, no setting up an ISP, no activation, no network configuration, no nothing. (BTW, the only networking component that I install is tcp/ip. All the other MS stuff never gets on the machine.)
  5. Reboot; Windows runs and all is well;
  6. Install the current version of Norton Internet Security Professional from a shrinkwrapped CD (firewall, anti-virus, etc.);
  7. Configure the Roadrunner net connection and reboot to pick up a DHCP lease;
  8. Launch the Norton update facility (per Norton's recommendation, the built-in XP firewall is turned off);
  9. Complete the Norton update and reboot;
  10. Launch Windows Update;
  11. Start to pull down Service Pack One; per Microsoft's instructions, all firewalls are turned off.

That's as far I got. During the first attempt, I acquired a virus or worm before I could finish the Norton update (machine powered down). On the second attempt, I got as far as Windows Update and SP1(continual rebooting).

So...how would you do it?"

833 comments

  1. If you can stand waiting... by foidulus · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can get a cd from microsoft(more info here that would have a lot of the updates you are looking for. You could also download it from your linux machine, and then do the whole installation offline.

    1. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Prod_Deity · · Score: 1

      The CD helps, but it's only updated from the first XP problem until February.... iif anything diabolical comes out after then, you're screwed. I think there is a way to combine all the updates & hotfixes from an box that already has Xp installed, but I have yet to need to do that yet.

    2. Re:If you can stand waiting... by XaviorPenguin · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is another way. If you go to Autopatcher.com, you can download all of Service Pack 1 and pre-Service Pack 2 updates with all critical and recommended updates. It is a hefty download (300MB +) but it is worth it. It comes with:
      -Direct X 9.0b + Updates
      -XP Powertoys
      -SP1 Critical and Recommended Updates
      -Pre SP2 Critical and Recommended Updates
      - + More

      I use it and it is updated every month. Get it while you can!

      --
      Friends help you move...
      REAL Friends help you move dead bodies... ^_^
    3. Re:If you can stand waiting... by phorm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You could also download it from your linux machine, and then do the whole installation offline

      Or better yet, use a morphix bootCD. You should be able to download the patches to Welchia et al directly (not using windows update), then reboot w/o the network cable in, patch, reboot, and you should be able to get the other less critical updates without being infected by RPC viruses.

    4. Re:If you can stand waiting... by LoneIguana · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can access the windows update catalog here: http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/d efault.asp There you can get secruity updates for all versions of windows. You actually download them to your computer rather then installing them. You could download them on another computer burn them to a CD, then install before connecting to the internet. The only problem is you need a computer with IE. Maybe get a friend to burn it for you?

    5. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Darwin_Frog · · Score: 1

      Or (and this won't help now, but I recommend it to those who may have this issue in the future) you burn SPx (whatever's latest) to a disc and also avail yourself of Autopatcher.

    6. Re:If you can stand waiting... by TPS+Report · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can (with just a few mouse clicks) automatically create an up-to-date ISO of Windows XP/2000/2003 with XPCreate. It's a really nice utility.

      --
      I was told that I could listen to the radio at a reasonable volume from nine to eleven...
    7. Re:If you can stand waiting... by zoloto · · Score: 5, Informative

      DUDE THIS ROCKS!
      Actually, what you can do is use Wine or WinEX and install Internet Explorer 5.5 from an old 5.5 installation CD on Linux,... download then burn to CD and you'll be great. I did that just now and i have to say thank you for the link.

      It seems that any useful links, MS hides behind a rediculous naming scheme for some odd reason.

      Thank you again, if I had MOD points, I'd certianly give them to you.

    8. Re:If you can stand waiting... by BollocksToThis · · Score: 5, Informative

      The only problem is you need a computer with IE.

      If you go to the Microsoft download center, you can download every patch with (almost?) any browser. I downloaded service pack 1 and every patch after that using nothing but Opera.

      It was less convenient than using WindowsUpdate/IE, but it would still have worked on a linux machine. The best part is, when friends give me their computers to reinstall XP, I don't need to spend four hours downloading patches from scratch.

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
    9. Re:If you can stand waiting... by gmplague · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, that's just the site that http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/ automatically redirects you to... I know that "rediculous" naming scheme may seem unfathomable to you, but I think at least a few people in the /. crowd are capable of handling it.

      --
      __________________________________________
      Take comfort in your ignorance.
      Grandmaster Plague
    10. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Condor7 · · Score: 5, Informative



      Autopatcher.com also has a Lite version and an UltraLite version.

      The UltraLite version contains only Critical and Recommended updates, along with IE and Outlook patches, and weighs in at 89MB.

    11. Re:If you can stand waiting... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      when doing your updates from windows update, go into the setting part of the updates. there is an option to download the entire update form the catalog. burn these to cd and you will have it. One thing that sucks is you will have to reboot after alot more of them more then if you were using the windows update webpage. A waordf of advice, always goto windows update and do your updates instead of letting windows do it for you with thier automatic tools. If something should happen because of an incompatability you will know why instead of guessing. besides doing it manually will give you a more knowlegaBLe state of mind when dealing with you computer.

    12. Re:If you can stand waiting... by flatface · · Score: 3, Insightful

      300mb+? At what point does it stop being just updates and gives out the entire damn OS?

    13. Re:If you can stand waiting... by woefulhc · · Score: 1

      My problem with the Microsoft downloads is that they make it sooo difficult to get the "network install". Their assumption is that you will be connected to the internet as you try to run most of these patches and updates. I managed to find the network install for WinXP SP1a. However, the I could not find such packages for IE6, Media Player or Direct X. I remember being as irritated by this same thing with an installer for Netscape at one point. I even understand the though behind doing the small initial download. It just makes it much more difficult to appropriately configure a system _before_ having to expose it to the internet.

      --
      Paul
    14. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At what point will this page start charging people? So sick of buying utlities for windos >

    15. Re:If you can stand waiting... by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain... sometimes it does seem they don't want you to download things directly. I got a little sick of constantly being directed to the windowsupdate site, especially when I'd already been there and they'd told me I couldn't use it without IE.

      For DirectX, look near the bottom of the page for the link to "DirectX 9b Redist".

      The Media Player 9 download is the only one linked in the download section - it's 13Mb, so I'm pretty positive it's not one of their stub downloaders.

      For IE6... XP comes with it, so that shouldn't be a problem. SP1 for IE6 is bundled in with XP SP1.

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
    16. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Glamdrlng · · Score: 1, Informative

      Considering that Microsoft hasn't been hit upside the head with the MD5 clue by four yet, I wouldn't recommend getting MS patches from a 3rd party. With no way to verify that the file you're downloading is the file you want, getting OS patches from anywhere but the vendor is a bad practice IMO.

      --

      Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
    17. Re:If you can stand waiting... by jonfelder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's not too different from the amount of patches you have to download after a fresh install of linux. Hell, when I loaded Suse 9.1, there were at least 100mb of updates already. If I installed a distro that was as old as XP I could very well see 300mb of updates.

    18. Re:If you can stand waiting... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Hell ya, this is perfect for reimaging boxes with that "fresh and new" feeling. Thank you much. If were here, I would give you a beer (better then mod points). Anyways, it's bookmarked

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    19. Re:If you can stand waiting... by MortisUmbra · · Score: 1

      Actually thats not the same site. The windowsupdate.microsoft.com link takes you to windows update. The link specified above takes you to a catalog page where you can search for updates by OS....very specifically by OS (like, Windows 2000 RTM, or XP 64-bit Enterprise).

      However I will say that http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/ isn't exactly a horrible naming scheme....pretty much just the version of the web app, windows update, microsoft.com, duh, catalog and english....not too hard....and if you goto windowsupdate.microsoft.com it will pop in the v4.blahblahblah crap so its really not a huge leap. But its MS so....BOOOOOOOO SCREW YOU BILL GATES!!!!....Hey, I got a quota to make.

      --

      "The saddest words of mice and men, are not those which were, but should have been."
    20. Re:If you can stand waiting... by ron_ivi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Slightly exaggerating. Most of that space is all the updates to non-linux (the "GNU/" part of "GNU/Linux") that's part of SUSE.

      Linux's updates shouldn't be more than a few megs, considering there are floppy-based distros where the whole distro fits in a meg or two.

      Of course if by "Linux" you're counting Wine & MSFT-office-warez & more, you'd have more security updates than a core Linux distro.

    21. Re:If you can stand waiting... by woefulhc · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the directions!

      So far as IE6 SP1 goes, my interest is more for the Win9x systems I end up working on. They don't have service packs. (Yes, I end up doing maintenance on the local family computers.)

      Because several have run into problems recently, I have started on an "Armor" CD as mentioned in the Seccom artilcle that was slashdotted a while back. I also know that it is far from complete. =(

      --
      Paul
    22. Re:If you can stand waiting... by jonfelder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're being awfully pedantic there. Yes, technically the updates to Linux (i.e. the kernel) are small. However, I'm sure if you just patch kernel32.exe or whatever the binaries for the kernel under windows are, the updates would be small too.

      A system consisting of just the kernel and a few command line tools would be awfully boring and not a particularly fair comparison.

      By "Linux" I'm referring to the kernel itself, along with X and the base applications that come along with gnome or KDE. Installing a distro with the base set of libraries, GUI, window manager, apps, etc that give a reasonable approximation of what you get with windows (no gimp, no koffice, etc) will require a considerable amount of downloading of patches if it's as old as XP.

    23. Re:If you can stand waiting... by smeenz · · Score: 1
      I spent a couple of hours searching for a downloadable ISO of that microsoft update before giving up and ordered it (free) from their website.

      About 2 weeks later, it turned up in the mail, and since I happened to be reinstalling windows on a laptop, I shoved it in and had a look at what was on the CD.

      To my complete lack of surprise, every single update that you can install from the CD has a clickable link that it encourages you to click on to get 'more information' from the internet. There are also a couple of other places where it wants you to be connected to the internet.

      Microsoft just doesn't get it.

    24. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to nitpick... The MD4/5 family of crypto hashes is rather weak. Why doesn't everybody just start using the SHA1 family instead (SHA1/SHA256)?

    25. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "However, I'm sure if you just patch kernel32.exe or whatever the binaries for the kernel under windows are, the updates would be small too. "
      Sure. But *CAN* you do this?

      "A system consisting of just the kernel and a few command line tools would be awfully boring and not a particularly fair comparison."
      But it's the *RIGHT* thing to do from a security point of view. If you're file-server is running X & Gnome & KDE & Wine & Kazaa, you're *BEGGING* for trouble.

      For the machines exposing services to the network, put just the services you *want* exposed on them, and update only those.

      The hard part about microsoft is that it's really hard to do that, since (as the article pointed out) the default install has everything with all the holes pre-installed and running.

    26. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      if you want to spare time when doing multiple installations, you can always use slipstreaming http://www.theeldergeek.com/slipstream_01.htm

    27. Re:If you can stand waiting... by jonfelder · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure. But *CAN* you do this?

      Absolutely. Just install the hotfixes that pertain to kernel vulnerabilities.

      But it's the *RIGHT* thing to do from a security point of view. If you're file-server is running X & Gnome & KDE & Wine & Kazaa, you're *BEGGING* for trouble.

      While you can't avoid installing the gui and what not in windows, you can turn off almost all of the running services. Technically, not that I'd advise it, you could avoid running IE, Outlook Express, etc...and forgo patching them in a server environment. Just don't run any apps either.

      The hard part about microsoft is that it's really hard to do that, since (as the article pointed out) the default install has everything with all the holes pre-installed and running.

      So does a default install of many distros...ones as old as XP even more so.

      I'm not a Microsoft advocate, I dislike Microsoft products for multiple reasons, but the size of the patches isn't one of them. All I'm saying is that when comparing a default (normal size) linux distro install to a default windows one, the amount of patches you need to install are similar.

    28. Re:If you can stand waiting... by nightrain6667 · · Score: 0, Troll

      There is another way, that is a lot easier... Take windows CD put it in the trash bin. Now get yourself Gentoo and your done :)

    29. Re:If you can stand waiting... by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      One warning about this, I tried it and it takes about 3 weeks to arrive (in the UK at least). Also it was dated February so it wasn't totally up to date with fixes, although it probably had enough to prevent blaster et al from hitting.

      The easiest solution apparently is just to turn the Windows XP "firewall" on and it should block blaster until you've had time to get all those updates down from Windows Update. Cheap routers with built in firewalls can do the job too but naturally that costs some cash.

    30. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when friends give me their computers to reinstall XP

      Friends? XP? You got some pretty dumb friends. Why do you Linux people help these losers?

      Everywhere it's getting worse. People I know who have been warning people for years about Windows - but no one ever listens, and NOW... Now they're beating down the doors: 'Help us, help us please!'

      F- 'em. Tell 'em to go rot.

    31. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The best part is, when friends give me their computers to reinstall XP, I don't need to spend four hours downloading patches from scratch.

      Last I checked, the license on Microsoft's patches only allowed you to install one copy.

    32. Re:If you can stand waiting... by ComaVN · · Score: 3, Informative

      MD5 is weak in the sense that it is possible to create two files with identical hash. It's NOT possible (at the moment) to create another file that has the same hash as an existing one.

      So, for this purpose, MD5 is adequate.

      You're right about SHA being better though.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    33. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Simon+Lyngshede · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can't use IE running under Wine, or you can, but you're not allowed to. The IE EULA states that you may not run IE on a platform for which it is not designed for.

    34. Re:If you can stand waiting... by zoloto · · Score: 2

      Actually, for your information, http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/ redirects you to this page: http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/en/default.a sp

      The one he has above which is this: http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/d efault.asp is quite different. Take a look at the URL and see for yourself.

      I could not find something like this simply on microsoft's site because it didn't have a "download only" option to go to their catalog and download the updates for installation later.

      As for your comment I think at least a few people in the /. crowd are capable of handling it. You apparently are not one of them.

    35. Re:If you can stand waiting... by zoloto · · Score: 1

      EULA's never were legally binding to begin with, it was just a way for software vendors to cover their own ass and state their terms of how and when they want you to run their software.

      Sorry, you have given the CD's away for free. I will run and use your software any damn way I choose.

    36. Re:If you can stand waiting... by gotw · · Score: 1

      If you, for example, install debian off the net you simply download the packages you require. No need to "patch", as a correctly configured install will get all the patched applications for you. So the load is similar to a normal install. With more people having broadband I'd imagine this to be ever more reasonable.
      It would be nice if maybe windows refused to remove it's internet connection firewall before it had recieved certain patches (maybe patches with a certain flag or something) and would make sure that the firewall was actually up before doing anything on the network at all. At least a checkbox to this effect enabled by default to satisfy corporate users, home users would certainly gain more than they suffer from this.

    37. Re:If you can stand waiting... by dolmen.fr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you want to be constructive, tell us how to do the same (download all updates and burn a CD for installation offline) for GNU/Linux distros: Debian, Gentoo, Mandrake, Red Hat, Suse...

      Usually you can download ISO images of release-time distros. But for updates you have to be online.
      AFAIK, no Linux distro proposes a 'Update CD' updated after every new vulnerability fix published.

    38. Re:If you can stand waiting... by andy+landy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The easiest way is to turn on the Windows XP firewall before you plug in the network/cable/dsl wire.

      * Install Windows
      * Install network drivers
      * TURN ON FIREWALL on the external connection
      * Plug in and dial the 'net
      * Run through Windows Update
      * (At your discretion) turn the firewall off again.

      --
      perl -e 'print "Just another Perl newbie\n";'
    39. Re:If you can stand waiting... by hdparm · · Score: 1

      I started refusing to install/patch windows on home computers. Clever friends chose fc2 + xover if they must have some win app. Those not so clever have to find someone else. They'll come back soon.

    40. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right click on a Microsoft update, then choose properties, then digital signatures.

      I think you'll find they went one better and digitally sign every update with their private key.

    41. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      spend $29.00 for a SMC barricade firewall/nat box.
      installed windows and let it sit for 24 hours before getting around to AN Y updates on a cable modem.... no viruses or worms. the same computer connected DIRECTLY to the cablemodem? owned within 30 seconds.

      anyone that is on the internet without a hardware NAT/basic firewall is driving a motorcycle naked through a june-bug swarm at 70mph.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    42. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Friends? XP? You got some pretty dumb friends. Why do you Linux people help these losers?

      My friends help me, I help my friends. It's not my decision what software they put on their computer, and when their courses dictate software that only runs under Windows, it's not my place to say "forget that, ditch your courses and use a MAN'S operating system".

      Basically, I don't tell my friends to fuck off because I quite like having friends. I know how to fix their computer in a tenth the time or cost it would take them, they know how to do the same for my car, or my plumbing, or any of a hundred other things.

    43. Re:If you can stand waiting... by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

      Funny, I never agreed to any license before downloading the file. I also never agreed to a license before I installed it, because I used a command line install.

      So if the license fell in a forest, installed successfully, and no-one ever saw it, does it really exist? Or is it maybe just a crooked lawyer's wet dream with no legal backing whatsoever?

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
    44. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A post from an adult - refreshing.

    45. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a folder on my Windows box where I keep service packs, Autopatcher, daily antivirus updates, Zonealarm, Adaware, CWShredder, etc, as well as device drivers.
      I burn an appropriate CD before each install, date it with a Sharpie, and do everything important offline. It ain't rocket science.

    46. Re:If you can stand waiting... by hetta · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/d efault.asp gives:
      You must be running a Microsoft Windows operating system in order to use Windows Update.

      That's linux + mozilla. I could have konqueror lie to MS, but I have no windows system to update -- and who cares anyway, eh? Except of course windows users who want a clean system on the web, poor pets.

    47. Re:If you can stand waiting... by saintp · · Score: 1
      Technically, not that I'd advise it, you could avoid running IE, Outlook Express, etc...and forgo patching them in a server environment.

      Actually, you can't. Many of the things that Windows Update passes off as patches for IE or Outlook are really patches for libraries that are used in Explorer (you know, the desktop environment) or other standard things. Even if you don't use IE, you still have to download all the patches for it because it's (still) so damn integrated into Windows.

      Personally, I just connect through a LinkSys router (already mentioned), in part because our house is wired and we have anywhere between six and ten computers in it at any given time, and in part because the problems of viruses and worms go away.

    48. Re:If you can stand waiting... by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

      Um, ok. Download Debian packages you want to update (.deb). Just apt-get -d dist-upgrade to Download to latest releases. Then copy your /var/cache/apt/archives to a cd.

      To install, you can simply dpkg -i or "update" your sources list via CD and then install them all.

      Any more questions? Didn't think so.

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    49. Re:If you can stand waiting... by chrwei · · Score: 1

      By "Linux" I'm referring to the kernel itself, along with X and the base applications

      That's called GNU/Linux. Linux is the kernel, GNU/Linux is Linux plus at least the base GNU utils to make a system that does more than just load drivers into memory.

      --
      - Disclaimer: Information in this post deemed reliable but not guaranteed.
    50. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The one thing I'd love for MS to do is to actually improve it's update process so that installing a patch doesn't require additional patches after the fact. Example: Installing a fresh MS Win2000 system and going to the MS Windows update site initially requires 17 patches. After installing these patches, you recheck the site and you must now get an additional 35 patches. Why can't they consolidate patches? I can understand leaving patches as being available (incase a user has requirement for a particular level), but make some of the older ones obsolete. Doing so should reduce the size of the patch downloads significantly.

      MS also needs to deliver product CD's at a particular patch level so that newly built systems by default have many of the patches. PC vendors handle this somewhat by generally providing a "system restore" disk that is at a certain patch level, but MS really should consider quarterly releases of their supported operating systems. By this I don't mean a patch CD, but an actual OS CD with all the patches built in (sort of like "WinXP (Q3 - 2004)" or something like that).

      As for patch sizes, I agree that you have to look at patches beyond the kernel when considering the size. While these may be more critical, you certainly want to update everything typically on the system. While you may patch the core patches first, your likely to secure the entire system.

      Out of curiosity I checked the Solaris 8 & 9 recommended patch sets and they were at 138MB and 122MB respectively. I'm sure MS could get to this size if they started to obsolete patches more regularly instead of holding back to the all encompassing service pack.

    51. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CD from Microsoft has the most recent service pack and the September '03 RPC patch. That's it.

      So if it's Blaster that's knocking you off, the disk would help. If it's an LSASS worm, you're still in trouble.

      MS's CD contains no brains about whether or not you actually have to APPLY these patches. The page with the install-this links is static, although it looks vaguely MBSAish.

      I was VERY disappointed with this CD. They SHOULD have put an MBSA or WinUpdate-style patch checker on it, AND more than just the one patch you would have needed to avoid being auto-infected at the time the disk was burned in February. As it stands now, someone with a slow connection would still going to have to spend hours and hours doing WindowsUpdate.

      Get a NATing firewall.

    52. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i downloaded all the windows patches and burned them on a CD. i update the directory and burn a new CD every time a new patch comes out. the CD is sitting there for me to use on any computer i need to work on. this is the safest way to update windows to remove the weaknesses the automatic viruses use.. but once you get online the stupid-people viruses become accessible (click everything you see and you will add 15+ spywares and 2+/- virus an hour....)

    53. Re:If you can stand waiting... by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 1

      If it is possible to create two files with an identical hash, how is it not possible to create another file that has the same hash as an existing one?

      Seems like the second case would be a subset of the first. Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you mean by "create two files with an identical hash"

      Could you explain or link to an explanation?

    54. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Glamdrlng · · Score: 1

      Good point. If Autopatcher's software checks those signatures then I don't see an issue.

      --

      Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
    55. Re:If you can stand waiting... by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      In the first case, you have complete control over BOTH files, so you're not aiming for a particular hash to match, just two files that might exploit a certain weakness of the algorithm.

      In the second case, one file (and hash) is fixed (posted on the website of the producer), and the trick is create another file that has the same hash. This is of course complicated by the fact that the new files needs other properties too for an attack to be successful, like being able to install a backdoor while still looking and behaving like the original file.

      Consider an imaginary hashing algorithm that is cryptographically secure, except that any file that starts with "x" generates the same hash.

      With this algorithm, case 1 would be trivial: just create two different files starting with a "x"

      Case 2 could still be extremely difficult, because most files will not start with "x", and their hash cannot be replicated with another file.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    56. Re:If you can stand waiting... by daBum · · Score: 1

      Consolidate patches: That's what service packs are. It would be nice if they'd bundle them a bit faster (possibly with alphas after them... so this is XP SP 1c... ). I think the reason they don't do this is they don't want to appear unstable - releasing a new service pack every month ("Windows can't be stable, they've released 15 service packs already...").

      Patch-level CD's - Already doable. You can take the i386 directory from the main install CD, and extract the SP / Patches into that same directory, and burn it onto a CD (I believe this is called "slipstream"ing the service pack). So why does MS need to do this, if you can do it? I know here at work it's done every time a new Service Pack comes out for an OS. So, it's not necessarily the absolutely most current, but it's reasonably close.

      As for the increasing # of patches, some patches require other patches to be installed. WindowsUpdate checks prerequisites, then installs prerequisites & reboots. After the reboot, it will show that you can install the second parts.

      --
      I am dyslexia of borg - your ass will be laminated.
    57. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      Consolidate patches: That's what service packs are.

      Service packs are an example of consolidating that patches but what is annoying is the fact that I can still install patches that must in turn be patched themselves. I guess I'm amazed that MS would let me install something that is known to have a security problem (OK, well not really amazed).

      Example: SA installs patch "A". Patch "A" is known to have a flaw and has already been fixed by patch "B". SA shouldn't, by default, have access to patch "A" as it is known to contain a security problem.

      Better example: I have a fresh MS Windows 2000 Professional system. I'd like to install Internet Explorer 6. To do this, I must first install IE 6 with all the security flaws/exploits found from the date of creation to today. Where can I download IE 6 with all the security updates rolled into the installation? I have to install the insecure IE 6 and apply patches and patches to those patches and potentially patches to those patches (and so on....).

      I think the reason they don't do this is they don't want to appear unstable

      The perception is already in people's mind. Those who are biased toward UNIX based systems will always find flaws in MS Win32 systems. Maybe from a home consumer market this might have some effect but if MS really wants to simplify the update process, they should look to consolidate patches better. Other vendors do this and don't seem to have a tarnished reputation due to the number of consolidate patches available. Maybe MS needs to reconsider the idea of Service Packs for naming convention.

      Patch-level CD's - Already doable. You can take the i386 directory from the main install CD, and extract the SP / Patches into that same directory

      I wasn't aware of this process. I'll have to see about doing that for some of my labs. Can this be done for all the patches to a certain date or just with the service packs? If I can do the service packs and the individual patches, I'd guess I'd need to worry about release dates. Will the latest patches work with this as they sometimes require earlier patches before being detected as needed (according to MS Windows Update)?

      So why does MS need to do this, if you can do it?

      I am suggesting this because the other operating systems I support do this already. They remove the steps of combining the latest updates with the OS CD for an installation.

    58. Re:If you can stand waiting... by lofoforabr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but normally, when you update your linux distro, you get newer versions of the programs and libraries.
      On MS, at least on our daily patching routine, the updates are only bugfixes, and usually don't introduce new features or enhancements.
      It's true, when I update Linux, it usually downloads tons of things. But just count how many separate programs there is. There are tons!
      On MS, you usually get updates on Windows itself, IE and Outlook.
      Did you ever get a new version of Paint, or WordPad, or some other component of Windows?
      On Linux, I get new versions of everything, from jpeg libraries to web browsers. It's way more programs to update.

    59. Re:If you can stand waiting... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      In particular, ignore Microsoft's instruction that you turn off all firewalls before running Windows Update. Leave them on!

      You don't have to get naked in the communal shower before entering the pool.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    60. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't "GNU/Linux" a misuse of the Linux trademark, in the same way that "Lindows" is a misuse of MSWindows's trademark?

    61. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1
      The sum total of SuSE 9.1 .rpm updates (not the patches) is 313MB, but that includes kernel versions optimised for smb, athlon and the default one along with two different levels of several packages.

      SuSE 8.1 weighs in at almost 1GB, but they have two (or more) levels of several different packages there including the three kernel versions and the kernel source. Don't ask me why, I use rsync and that annoys the hell out of me ;-) If I try and clean up my local directory of these old dupes, the next rsync serves them up again.

      There are a couple of points here:
      • I could just (and did) download the rpms here without any problems, Microsoft impose restrictions which limit my ability to download fixes for other people using rsync.
      • No-one blew me off the web within seconds when I started downloading, the SuSE firewall was adequate for the task and not many of the updates were security-related anyway.
        Saying that SuSE 9.1 has had less time to accumulate security problems would be very misleading though, WinXP is the newest version available so that is the one we measure. As for the XP update CD from Microsoft, the newest available for the German version is from October.
      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    62. Re:If you can stand waiting... by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      Those points are not relevant to my argument.

      I could just (and did) download the rpms here without any problems, Microsoft impose restrictions which limit my ability to download fixes for other people using rsync.

      This has nothing to do with the size of the updates. That was my only comment. I in no way said Microsoft was better.

      No-one blew me off the web within seconds when I started downloading, the SuSE firewall was adequate for the task...

      Also irrelevant. Again, this has nothing to do with the size of the updates. Besides, you can enable the XP firewall and it will keep you from being "blown off the web". Just make sure to plugin the network cable -after- enabling the firewall.

      and not many of the updates were security-related anyway.
      Saying that SuSE 9.1 has had less time to accumulate security problems would be very misleading though, WinXP is the newest version available so that is the one we measure. As for the XP update CD from Microsoft, the newest available for the German version is from October.


      Aaah...now this is relevant. If you install the latest XP you can reasonably get...(i.e.) XP with SP1, you have no where near 313 megs of security updates to install. The total is around 30 - 50 megs I believe. Similar as with SuSE 9.1 probably.

    63. Re:If you can stand waiting... by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      Well I borked that up...guess I should've used preview...oh well.

    64. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, if you want to compare Windows and Linux updates, then be fair about it.

      Windows, pretty much all versions, comes with:

      IE

      Windows Explorer

      Kernel

      Paint

      Notepad

      Wordpad

      Outlook Express

      MS-DOS Prompt

      Hardly anything.

      What does Linux come with? Thousands of programs.

      But if you're going to compare how many updates each needs, then strip Linux down to nothing but what Windows comes with too:

      Kernel

      links

      Midnight Commander

      Gimp

      Vim

      Emacs

      Mutt

      Bash

      See the difference? If Linux came with nothing but those tools, you would not be updating much at all.

      If all you had installed were the above tools you'd be lucky to get even 10 updates.

    65. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit, why can't MY friends be good at fixing cars as a method of barter? Serves me right for getting into computers (and computer friends) at such a young age!

    66. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      MS doesn't make it easy to download the pieces for IE6. I have a firewalled Internet connection when I download these things, but I still get tired of sucking IE6 through a T1 instead of a share on a local 100Mbps segment. You have to download the stub installer, then invoke it with some special command-line options:

      "C:\Downloads\ie6setup.exe" /c:"ie6wzd.exe /d /s:""#E"

      Yeah, like I'd have figured that out on my own! See this page for details:

      http://www.updatexp.com/download-ie6.html

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    67. Re:If you can stand waiting... by CFrankBernard · · Score: 1

      To display the link to Windows Update Catalog on the main page of Windows Update, click "Personalize Windows Update" (located on the middle-left) and check-mark that option (then click Save Settings, of course).

    68. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, that posting of mine was incomplete - I was part way through writing that and then a thunderstorm hit. I simply pressed 'submit' and powered everything down.

      Then England started playing Croatia and I sort of lost interest in the whole discussion. 4-2 :-)

      Now it is time to drift ontopic again, although I'm not sure where I got the link, it may well have been this discussion.

      Vlad

    69. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Just for reference, this part of M$'s site also works fine with my preferred combination, Netscape 3.04 (yes, really; images and js off) and Getright (any version) to do the actual file fetching.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    70. Re:If you can stand waiting... by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 1

      Hmm, so what you meant was more like

      It's NOT possible (at the moment) to create another file that has the same hash as an existing one that has a backdoor while still looking and behaving like the original file.

      and not simply that it was possible to create an arbitrary file with an predetermined hash. Actually I'd be impressed by the simpler case of picking a hash and creating a file with that hash.

    71. Re:If you can stand waiting... by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      "If you're file-server is running X & Gnome & KDE & Wine & Kazaa, you're *BEGGING* for trouble."

      You just said "If you are file-server (sic) is running X & Gnome & KDE & Wine (sic; it's actually WINE) & Kazaa (sic; I believe it's KaZaa, but I could be wrong), you're *BEGGING* for trouble."

    72. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. My friends usually just serve as Beer-Buyers.

    73. Re:If you can stand waiting... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      Basically, I don't tell my friends to **** off because I quite like having friends.

      You don't belong here then.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    74. Re:If you can stand waiting... by WNight · · Score: 1

      You don't pick a hash, you exploit the "birthday paradox" to get matching files.

      Let's say you're a scummy lawyer and you're asked to draw up a will for an old couple. You do, but being the one who writes the will you're allowed to word it, as long as the meaning is what you wish. So you write two wills, one they see and a fake will. The couple "signs" the will by saying "I atest to the terms in will 0x46894a945...." The idea being that you present the until-then secret will at their death and the family knows it's the right one because it hashes to the hash their grandparents agreed to.

      What they don't know is that you wrote the non-fake will and then created a few million mechanical almost-copies, with an extra space here and a different phrasing there. You do the same with the fake will and chances are pretty good that you get a match between the sets. Much, much, better than if you simply created slightly different copies of the fake will trying for a match.

      With birthdays there's an even chance that in a room of 23 people, two will have the same birthday. Of course, the chance that someone else shares your birthday is still 1/365 and you need 182 people to make the chance even that someone matches you.

      So this is just a specialized case of the birthday paradox where you've got two sets and you only care about cross-set matching. Like what's the chance that a girl at the party has the same birthday as a boy at the same party, for groups of a given size. That, and a year with 2^128th days... But it's still easier than trying to match a specific hash/date.

      http://efgh.com/math/birthday.htm - Note that the 'hash'ing they talk about is in an index context, but the same principle applies to crypto.

      SHA1 is better in two ways. It's a longer hash, meaning that it's harder to attach like this, and it's stronger, meaning it's harder to predict variation at any step in the hash, so it's harder to make changes that don't change the final outcome.

    75. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Vombatus · · Score: 1

      Of course, you need Internet explorer to sign up for the cd - Mozilla 1.7 will not work

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
    76. Re:If you can stand waiting... by desalien · · Score: 1

      Got gentoo on a disc, 4200 Kbytes patches downloaded!

      --
      make install, not war
    77. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For older Windows installs, the best way to go about downloading IE6 is by hunting for and grabbing the IEAK (search the MS site for it... you may need to provide some fake registration info). With this you can not only download the parts of IE you want to install, you can customize the options so you don't need to spend any time setting them to reasonable defaults after the install.

    78. Re:If you can stand waiting... by smacktits · · Score: 1

      If you hadn't written that reply, I would have. Nicely done.

    79. Re:If you can stand waiting... by brolin9 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm still using SuSE 8.0 Pro, last two installs I did with it (desktop machine with KDE and development and multimedia tools) took 75M and 66M respectively from online update after the initial installation. And that's in the last couple of weeks...

    80. Re:If you can stand waiting... by lewko · · Score: 1

      How can you trust Autopatcher? How are you comfortable that it is not a trojan horse?

      I mean no disrespect to what is most likely a noble cause, but it does seem to be a leap of faith.

      I appreciate that the same trust issues apply to software from Microsoft, but that seems to be a more calculated risk.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    81. Re:If you can stand waiting... by nealmcb · · Score: 1

      This is a weakness in MD5, but how feasible is it today? Has anyone ever actually publically done this?
      Can you point to two different files with the same hash?

      --

      --Neal
      Go IETF!

    82. Re:If you can stand waiting... by WNight · · Score: 1

      From this page

      MD4:
      [I]t has been shown that collisions for MD4 can be found in about a minute on a typical PC. [...] MD4 [...] should not be used.

      MD5:
      Given the surprising speed with which techniques on MD4 were extended to MD5 we feel that it is only prudent to draw a cautious conclusion and to expect that collisions for the entire hash function might soon be found.

      In addition, the 128-bit output is arguably not long enough to make generating collisions using a birthday attack infeasible.


      I couldn't find an example of actually broken MD5, but it seems like it's simply a matter of time. Considering the value of what could ride on it, it doesn't seem worth using as a document identification (the lawyer example) but it perfectly reasonable to use between trusted parties as a message verification hash for things with a low to medium value and a short lifetime.

      (Don't get the government or really motivated crooks interested, and don't hide a secret people will still be interested in twenty years from now.)

    83. Re:If you can stand waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to stop your machine rebooting type shutdown -a at a the run box - you can continue downloading. You will still have to remove the virus after of course!

  2. SP1 From CD by The+Snowman · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I install Windows it is behind a NAT firewall which helps (no open ports from the outside). The first thing I do is install SP1 from CD, next I update from Windows Update.

    I recommend downloading SP1 and burning it in Linux, then using that CD to patch up the Windows box before connecting it to the network.

    --
    24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    1. Re:SP1 From CD by Malc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article submitter could just as easily have written "Can a home user install and update Linux without being attacked". It doesn't matter which OS you install, if it's out of date then you're vulnerable. I think the article is almost flamebait!

      There are things the submitter could have done, like stopped all services that listen for connections. Ran Windows XP's firewall on their connection. Unbound Microsoft Networking Client from their NIC, etc. They could have booted up in safe mode with network support.

      But the solution you offered is probably the best. I recommend to everybody these days that they run behind a cheap NAT box. It doesn't matter which OS you use, keep your computer off the internet! A NAT box is the simplest and not particulary expensive solution, and it'll leave you much safer and require less effort on the vigilance (note: I didn't no vigilance ;)).

      We have incompetent IT guys at our place and Sasser is loose on the corporate LAN. We were trying to create a Win2K box but it kept rebooting. We just copied the patch for that over via CDRW, although the submitter could have downloaded everything they needed first from their Linux installation. In carpentry they always say "measure twice, cut once". This person didn't do enough preparation.

    2. Re:SP1 From CD by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      There are things the submitter could have done, like stopped all services that listen for connections. Ran Windows XP's firewall on their connection. Unbound Microsoft Networking Client from their NIC, etc. They could have booted up in safe mode with network support.

      There are many things the submitter could have done, but I think a better question to ask is "how do I install Windows safely if I am not a computer geek?" In that case, the best thing would be to use a NAT firewall because it closes all ports you do not open explicitly. I believe that now all boxed Windows XP versions (and OEM from Dell, Gateway et al) have SP1 out of the box, which helps.

      I think a big part of avoiding worms and spyware is user education. I just ran Ad-Aware on my wife's XP machine and found over 150 objects comprising about six discrete malware applications and tons of cookies from porn sites. My XP machine had six malware objects. Minus the false positives there was one dialer from a porn site that did not work with Mozilla so I had to use IE. Good thing I do not have a modem. On my Linux box I have zero malware, zero viruses.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    3. Re:SP1 From CD by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you sure your wife's not just a pr0n fiend?

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    4. Re:SP1 From CD by TrixX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All the linux update tools I know (apt, red-carpet, urpmi) run perfectly with the firewall up and at maximum paranoia level. So I could install, set my firewall to reject all incoming connections, and update; that would leave me vulnerable only to very basic level exploits (like some hypothetical hole in ICMP).

      I've not used windows update, but the poster said it asked to lower the firewall, and I think that's a weak point.

    5. Re:SP1 From CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not really true and I'm sure you know it.

      The chances of getting infected in a half hour time frame using linux or macosX is about nill.

      On my cable modem, if I turn on ZoneAlarm alerts, I get about 1 windows virus/worm attack every 1-2 minutes. Often more.

      There are a lot of reasons windows is more vulnerable than linux, and only one of them is its popularity.

      You tried to list a number of "obvious" things someone could do, but they aren't that obvious. Even if your mom knew how to turn on the XP firewall, according to the poster the windows update site says you have to turn it off to download and install SP1. If that's true, it's pretty stupid. I've used ZoneAlarm before connecting a fresh load of Windows to the internet without problems, and I definitely recommend use of a third-party firewall for fresh installs (if not also post-install!)

    6. Re:SP1 From CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are things the submitter could have done, like stopped all services that listen for connections. Ran Windows XP's firewall on their connection. Unbound Microsoft Networking Client from their NIC, etc. They could have booted up in safe mode with network support.

      So all of these are things that the average windows XP user would think to do, right? Obviously, it's a Windows product so this stuff must just come like falling off a log. Now if it were that nasty complicated Linux, it wouldn't be anywhere near as easy or intuitive to get fully installed before becoming some script kiddie's bitch.

    7. Re:SP1 From CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It doesn't matter which OS you install, if it's out of date then you're vulnerable.

      Well, I guess you haven't installed SuSE lately. The installer prompts to retrieve the latest updates before the kernel is booted.

    8. Re:SP1 From CD by Glamdrlng · · Score: 1

      If the submitter is planning on making other windows house calls, he should keep XP SP1, 2000 SP4, and the 2000 and XP patches for the DCOM vulnerabilites exploited by sasser and blaster on him. Either burn them to CD or get a decent flash drive.

      If on the other hand we want to address how your average joe user can install a new computer without getting hosed, I'd have to say that, given the current state of Windows SEcurity, this is not a possibility wihtout additional training for the average user. XP SP2 will fix some of this, but that won't take effect until machines start shipping with SP2 preinstalled.

      --

      Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
    9. Re:SP1 From CD by msobkow · · Score: 3, Informative

      I run behind a firewall as well. Last time I did a WinXP install (not that long, unfortunately), I had no problems.

      But I don't install or enable any services during an initial installation, just the core OS. I don't do anything but install manufacturer's drivers before installing an anti-virus product.

      After the anti-virus is fully updated, then I start dealing with Windows updates.

      At no point have I ever had to disable hardware or software firewalls to install Windows updates. I have no idea why they continue to insanely recommend you remove all your security just to download updates -- you don't need to.

      In fact, the only time I shut down the antivirus is during a disconnected defrag. And there is no way to disable the hardware firewall.

      If you're connecting directly to the net with a Windows box, you're just getting what you deserve. Either hide it behind a hardware firewall, or accept the fact that you're just another spambot-in-waiting.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    10. Re:SP1 From CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, name one recent non-MSWin system that has remote-exploitable holes enabled by default. Even if you can name one, you seem to imply that all systems would have such problems.

      Most modern Unix-like systems (various Linux distros, *BSD, MacOS X) have every remote service disabled by default. Even if some aren't (ssh is enabled by default in some distributions, but the security problems there have been with ssh require much more than a running sshd to be exploitable), you can easily disable them without breaking anything.

    11. Re:SP1 From CD by boots@work · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter which OS you install, if it's out of date then you're vulnerable.

      Actually, no. Most Linux distributions dating from the same vintage as XP will not let you get remotely raped out-of-the-box.

      If you start up Apache or rsyncd then you might be in trouble, but merely acting as a client is not enough for somebody to root you. It's been a long long time since there was an attack that could take over a client that's not accepting any connections and is just downloading from trusted servers.

    12. Re:SP1 From CD by julesh · · Score: 1

      From experience, I can tell you that you don't have to kill your firewall to run windows update.

      I think the poster interpreted the instruction to "quit all running applications" a little too seriously.

    13. Re:SP1 From CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article isn't flamebait, it's FUD, pure and simple. Note the author goes into great detail about what he did, but doesn't explore or describe exactly *which* "virus or worm" he contracted. He has simply assumed that is the problem and posted it to Slashdot. This shouldn't get through the bullshit filter of anyone with any technical nouse whatsoever. Most likely he's trying to install on an old crappy machine that has a known driver problem or bad hardware and it's crashing.

    14. Re:SP1 From CD by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      I recommend downloading SP1 and burning it in Linux, then using that CD to patch up the Windows box before connecting it to the network.

      I dont.. I reccomend you SLIPSTREAM the service packs into the windows install CD.

      I have here 3 XP install disks with SP1 SP1a and SP2 slipstreamed into them. now I dont need to install ANY patches and only hotfixes when I am done.

      do a search for windows XP slipstream for the full instructions.

      I am very suprised that other have NOT talked of this here already, I though it was a standard practice to update your install CD's.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:SP1 From CD by makomk · · Score: 1
      The article submitter could just as easily have written "Can a home user install and update Linux without being attacked". It doesn't matter which OS you install, if it's out of date then you're vulnerable. I think the article is almost flamebait!

      Not true. Recent versions of MandrakeLinux have an option in the installer to download and install any patches. Because at this stage no network services are active, and it only visits the MandrakeLinux update server, it's very unlikely that you'll get attacked.

      With Windows, the last time I checked you have to reboot into Windows and run Windows Update while connected to the internet, and by default there are half-a-dozen open ports that someone could use to hack in via in the meantime.

    16. Re:SP1 From CD by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

      I second (or third, or Nth) the suggestion to do it behind a firewall. Most of the viruses, etc., that I've read about attack Windows via ports that aren't needed for HTTP or FTP, and there is no reason for most people to have Windows services ports open to the Internet. So get that router/firewall closed down to reject inbound connections and then open up only the ones you need. (Usually you can figure out what these are by looking at the router's firewall log.)

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    17. Re:SP1 From CD by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1, Insightful
      It doesn't matter what OS you install

      I've *NEVER* applied a security patch to my home linux machine, and it is no doubt vulnerable to tons of exploits. My home linux security practices are comparable to diving into a cesspool with an open wound, however, I have NEVER had a virus/worm/whatever on that machine.

      The windows partition by contrast, requires 'sterile technique' to avoid immediate contamination, and still gets sick from time to time. Windows is like an OS with AIDS, or maybe it's more like the 'boy in the bubble'. To install, first you have to build a plastic firewall with HEPA filters and autoclaves for everything entering or exiting, and then the OS will only survive if you maintain positive pressure inside the bubble to keep out 'germs'.

      Potato blights can wipe out entire crops of cloned potato plants, but non-cloned heirloom varieties are not suceptible. You can grow them, and have a better defense against disease than any remedies or blight epidemic control techniques ( like burning crops ) could ever provide. Sure some disease might be able to kill your strain of potatos, but you aren't likely to catch it from the clone-growing farmer next door. You aren't likely to catch it at all.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    18. Re:SP1 From CD by Fooby · · Score: 1

      A workaround if you can't get the CD is just let the damn thing get the virus, and when the "reboot counter" starts up, turn back the clock two hours. The counter will change from 30 seconds to two hours and 30 seconds and you'll have time to get the definitions and updates. Once the system is up to date you can deal with the virus. Sucks but I've had to do this on more than one occasion for some hapless Windows users.

    19. Re:SP1 From CD by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Windows is like an OS with AIDS, or maybe it's more like the 'boy in the bubble'.

      Or maybe it's more like the baby with the baboon heart: Every minute it's still alive is a miracle...

      Laugh, it's a joke!
      Credits to Paul Simon, Graceland.

  3. Easy by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    Do the installation behind a personal NAT/firewall device.

    (Or, read all the posts about how you can put together some huge, convoluted update CD that's never completely up-to-date instead of just spending $35 on a little hardware firewall.)

    1. Re:Easy by Phosphor3k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OR turn on the windows XP firewall under the advanced tab on your network connection's properties before you plug the network cable in.

    2. Re:Easy by Josh_Borke · · Score: 5, Informative

      or install zonealarm. and don't turn off the firewall. I've never had to turn off my firewall when doing any windows update.

      I would update windows before updating the firewall, that way you don't have to worry so much about being shutdown while the firewall is down.

      my .02

    3. Re:Easy by Otter · · Score: 3, Informative
      OR turn on the windows XP firewall under the advanced tab on your network connection's properties before you plug the network cable in.

      I've installed Windows once (98, several years ago) and even I know about turning the firewall on. Why?

      Because this is at least the fouth freaking article Slashdot has run on this question!!!

      (Remember the one that linked to an article about "Installing Windows Safely" and all the posts were "Instead of linking to a large PDF, why not tell people to just turn the firewall off?"?)

    4. Re:Easy by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Informative

      No need to put together a huge convoluted update CD.

      Some people have already done it. Autopatcher contains every update available on Windows Update since SP1 and then some (it's advisable to download SP1 onto the CD as well, though most recent WinXP CDs have SP1 pre-installed).

      Basically, you put the CD in, click 'Update', and all the relevant patches are installed. No downloads. Only one reboot at the end. No virus risk. It's also excellent for my clients who are still on 56k :)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:Easy by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Funny
      Or, read all the posts about how you can put together some huge, convoluted update CD that's never completely up-to-date instead of just spending $35 on a little hardware firewall.
      Well, yeah, but c'mon, there are plenty of ways to do it without spending any extra money on hardware or software. Some possibilities:
      • Use Lindows as a substitute for Windows.
      • Wait for the next version of Windows. MS says they're making security a top priority now, so I'm sure the next version won't have any vulnerabilities.
      • Run DOS -- I don't think anybody is writing viruses that can infect it.
      • When your machine gets attacked, look at your log files to see where the attack came from, find out who their ISP is, and then send a polite letter by U.S. mail asking them to make their customer stop behaving badly. Repeat until all the bad, naughty machines are gone from the internet.
      • Start your own internet. Only people you trust are invited to join it, and nobody is allowed to link it to the bad, old internet.
      • Call MS tech support and ask for help.
      OK, I admit that last one was a little silly.
    6. Re:Easy by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      This is how I do it:

      1. Obtain Sygate Personal Firewall (free, scroll to bottom) and burn to CD, safe partition, etc.

      2. Disconnect from your network and install Windows.

      3. Install Sygate.

      4. Reconnect to network and get updates from Microsoft.

      Using this procedure, not once have I ever had a problem with viruses during an install.
    7. Re:Easy by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      you are correct, I have done the same thing several times and zone alarm does the job. This assumes you can download and burn it from another box, which is not that difficult.

      I had the same problem back with 2000. I put it on an SDSL line (going to use it as a secondary dns box). Was infected before I could get it fully installed, no less before I could get it updated.

      The real irony is: At the time, there had been several BIND security problems (think RH 6.2-7.2), and my idea was to convert my secondary DNS box to a completely different OS (Win2k + SimpleDNS) so the likelyhood of both boxes getting pwned would be very remote, in theory. Obviously, I just went back to using Linux for Secondary DNS with a hand rolled BIND and just checked more often for patches.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    8. Re:Easy by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you RTFA, you'll see that
      per Microsoft's instructions, all firewalls are turned off.
      Microsoft need to fix one of the update process, the firewall, or the docs.
    9. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! I can beleive anyone would think it's a great idea to take a 'base' WinXP install and plug it straight into the Internet. Haven't they ever looked at their firewall logs?

      Since Linux is the OS of choice, pick up a Linksys WRT54G and run the Sveasoft firmware on it. It's like running a floppy firewall with the footprint of a Linksys.... and 802.11g, bandwidth shaping, Wall Watcher support, etc.

      IMZombie

    10. Re:Easy by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      You'll be infected far before zone alarm finishes downloading over a dialup link.
      I honestly wasn't sure what the fuss was about over this until talking to a friend over the phone as she tried to get her new computer online. As soon as I finished talking her through getting her isp(earthlinks) crap working, she mentions something about the computer saying it needs to shut down.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    11. Re:Easy by ratlater · · Score: 0, Troll

      Pre SP1 the built-in firewall is disabled when you run Windows Update (MS was really thinking there). So the built-in firewall is useless unless you are starting from SP1.

      -matt

      --
      http://thewonderllama.com
    12. Re:Easy by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      this is the easiest option... i don't think i'd recommend using a cable or dsl connection without having some sort of firewall (not a software firewall on the machine in question, but something external like a broadband router or linux router) between the computer and the internet. they're cheap, they're easy to use, and you don't need to disable them to install updates.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    13. Re:Easy by Salamanders · · Score: 2, Informative

      I actually got really good help from MS when I contacted them about a Windows Update issue I was having with XP.... It shocked the hell out of me. Proactively following up with me, various ideas to solve the problem, it was great.

    14. Re:Easy by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 2

      If you read the submitter's story you'll see that he can install Windows without connecting to the 'net. He unplugged his pipe, installed XP, rebooted. Why can't he turn the firewall on NOW before he plugs the box back into the 'net? Goodness.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    15. Re:Easy by Knara · · Score: 1

      Yes. It's too bad there's no way to make a CD with Zone Alarm on it and then install the program while the new machine isn't on the wire. Oh wait...

    16. Re:Easy by caffeineboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      EXCEPT that the stupid XP firewall service is not started when the interface is started. You have your ass in the wind every time the machine boots.

      --
      +++ ATH0 +++
    17. Re:Easy by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      I called them up about a problem when I first got XP, they said they would call back, and never did.

    18. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Linux is the OS of choice

      For NAT/firewall, I think it's safe to say that OpenBSD is the OS of choice.

    19. Re:Easy by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Turn the machine on. Turn the firewall on. THEN plug in the ethernet cable. Or just use Windows catalog on another machine to download the service pack and all the security patches (there's a rollup for most of them), burn to Cd, and install them before plugging in the ethernet cable. Me, I just install behind a router with all the ports off. (Conveniently, my home Windows box is running through my Airport, and only my Mac is exposed to the outside world.)

    20. Re:Easy by ecarlson · · Score: 1

      I agree totally, and people shouldn't be running their Windows boxes on the Internet without at least a NAT router in front of them even if they are patched.

      The patch CD's are good for people with slow connections, but they have to be updated often, and you need a fast connection, or a lot of time to gather the files for the CD in the first place.

      --
      - Eric, InvisibleRobot.com
    21. Re:Easy by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      just wiat unitll you start trusting thier anti-virus software.

    22. Re:Easy by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It has been my experience that the conection properties won't let you at the settings for the firewall with the conection not on. Actually you loose access to alot of functions without the cable conected if it will even show up. i guess he needs to conect it to a lan or somethign then enable the firewall

    23. Re:Easy by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There isn't if you don't have a cd burner and you live out in the middle of nowhere (as she does now).
      I'm going to end up having to mail her a patch cd, which is really pretty stupid when you think about it.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    24. Re:Easy by zelurxunil · · Score: 1

      MS says they're making security a top priority now, so I'm sure the next version won't have any vulnerabilities.
      Comcast is going to make fighting spam a top priority now too...

      --

      What's another word for Thesaurus?
      -Steve Wright
    25. Re:Easy by Josh_Borke · · Score: 1
      the biggest thing i remember from when blaster hit, was just the
      shutdown -a
      at the command prompt. that will stop the auto-shutdown so that you can get on with your life. perhaps it will work with the new exploits too.
    26. Re:Easy by Moonpie+Madness · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that the computer connects to the network before the windows firewall activates? Tell me you aren't serious! IF you are, I've been more vulnerable than I thought. That's just plain negligent.

    27. Re:Easy by robogun · · Score: 1
      I think his point was, you have to actively turn it on.

      Ppl on this site probably all know how to do this. But your avg. windows users? They don't even know the built in firewall exists, and that's why they keep getting nailed.

      Also, what if you are using 98/me/NT/2000? All in all the best solution is to install behind a hardware firewall.

    28. Re:Easy by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      This is just one example of where MS is taking a huge step in the right direction with SP2. The firewall is on by default. A more important change IMO is that the warnings that pop up when programs attempt to be installed can not be dismissed by just hitting OK. The user must select yes or no before the Ok button enables.

    29. Re:Easy by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't HAVE to do that. But ya, that will work. Just run an IPCONFIG /RENEW at the command line after it's all booted to grab an IP.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    30. Re:Easy by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

      BS, I work for the helpdesk at my university and we do this all the time. The machine does not have to be connected to view the network properties or turn on the firewall in XP, home or pro.

      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
    31. Re:Easy by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahaa, you could make an ethernet "wrap plug" - get a normal RJ45, fit a wire from pin 1 to pin 3, and from pin 2 to pin 6. Crunch with your cable cruncher, and when you plug it in, the link light will magically come on!

    32. Re:Easy by Marbleless · · Score: 1

      Not only is the SP2 firewall on by default, it is activated before the network is activated so there is no unprotected interval.

      --
      --I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
    33. Re:Easy by jaghatarjankare · · Score: 1

      or install zonealarm. and don't turn off the firewall. I've never had to turn off my firewall

      Well yeah - DUH - and no wonder...

    34. Re:Easy by jaghatarjankare · · Score: 1

      Start your own internet. Only people you trust are invited to join it, and nobody is allowed to link it to the bad, old internet.

      But can we run WINDOWS again then? Please? PRETTY PLEASE?

    35. Re:Easy by jaghatarjankare · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with the Internet that a complete ban on Windows (l)users wouldn't cure, so stop your insinuations!

    36. Re:Easy by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      just get a better firewall, one that lets you have more than just generic levels of control over your connections. i use Kerio Personal Firewall, and when im asked if i want the Windows Update installer to be able to connect to the internet, i create a rule for it to go through. nothin else gets in or out until after im done patching. :-P

    37. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to recommend Kerio too. It is absolutely delightful, much nicer interface than Zone Alarm.

      I see this article mostly as FUD. Connect to the net without a firewall?! Just because Microsoft tells you to do it, doesn't make it a good idea..

    38. Re:Easy by Bluelive · · Score: 1

      Except that you only should disable the firewall if your having problem getting the updates. Just like a few installs ask for the virus scanner to be turned off, only do it if the install fails and your sure its really not a virus. Its all a support issue, they dont want people complaining about windowsupdate because they have a too tight firewall.

    39. Re:Easy by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      So have Zone Alarm (or in my case, the Sygate Personal Firewall) on a CD, and install it before you go to the Windows Update site. I've reinstalled Windows 2000 several times now, the last time when I last upgraded to a bigger hard drive. Never caught any virus while updating. Go figure.

      And generally in the time it took to do two installs, plus write that flamebait question to Slashdot, he could have just spent 15 minutes downloading a firewall with his Linux computer and burning it on a CD. Or 15 seconds activating the firewall that comes with Windows XP.

      But nah, just solving someone's problem instead of making a huge "Microsoft sucks" fuss, wouldn't be as fashionable for the self-respecting IT professional.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    40. Re:Easy by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      The thing is, that's not true: Microsoft says to turn off antivirus, NOT FIREWALL.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    41. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      Go ahead and turn on the Windows firewall, but DON'T count on that being enough: ALWAYS use a hardware firewall!

    42. Re:Easy by Knara · · Score: 1

      Such is life.

    43. Re:Easy by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      hmm.. i just double checked by adding a new network card to a fresh install of windows XP pro. i wasn't able to0 access any of the network proprties outside the tcp/ip page until i conected a cable to it and it did the little detected network conection dialog. Tell me what are you doing different. I added the card, booted, it found drivers, i restarted to make sure, then checked the properties, wasn't there.

    44. Re:Easy by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it needs to be plugged in the very first time it's connected, but we've released the IP, deleted the winsock keys, and uninstalled/reinstalled TCP/IP on many machines and have had no problems turning on the firewall. Not sure what we're doing different.

      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
  4. Its easy... by CyberBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Leave the software firewall turned on if you can, if not, get a cheap Linksys Cable/DSL router, it will block all of those viruses.

    I have to reinstall most of my family's computers when I go home, I made all of them have routers. :P

    -Bill

    --
    -Bill
    1. Re:Its easy... by Kirby-meister · · Score: 1
      I think there's a problem with the software firewall, though - if you reboot, the firewall might not kick in until the firewall service actually starts...so if you don't patch the machine before rebooting and have the thing plugged in...

      At least that's what I've seen from testing...could be wrong.

    2. Re:Its easy... by vnsnes · · Score: 2, Funny

      He can either disable the cable modem or unplug the network cable until the OS is up and running.

    3. Re:Its easy... by Deathlizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll second this. putting on the Built in Firewall in XP will stop Blaster from infecting the machine. Pretty unplug from the network, install XP, turn on the built in firewall and hit windowsupdate until you get all the patches.

      With Windows 2000 however, it gets fun since there is no built in firewall for that. You can use zonealarm to block the virus traffic, or you can use a Router/Firewall to block traffic. I know you can set IP security policies in windows 2000 without downloading anything but I never tried it on a machine that was unpatched and able to be infected.

    4. Re:Its easy... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Use the XP firewall. It will kick in before the dhcp assignment.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    5. Re:Its easy... by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      Or, unplug the network cable and don't plug it back in until your firewall is active.

    6. Re:Its easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Leave the software firewall turned on if you can...

      Look, that is just not enough! The software firewall is the last service brought up by XP (currently, M$ has promised that SP2 will fix this [not holding my breath]) so there is a 20 to 30 second window (every pun intended0 when the machine reboots between the time the system brings up network services enough to do a DHCP request and when the firewall is active. Looking at my firewall logs, I am still getting hit every 10 to 60 seconds with various Windows vulnerability probes.

      So, unless you want to play CAT5 shuffle every time Windows wants to reboot during the update process, a seaparte firewall is the only way!

  5. Firewall by jpaz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Keep the firewalling on, no matter what Microsoft says. I've never had an instance where having a firewall turned on kept windowsupdate from working properly.

    1. Re:Firewall by orin · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is absolutely correct. You can even use the simple Internet Connection Firewall that is built into Windows XP

    2. Re:Firewall by the0ther · · Score: 1

      Right on. I don't even know what this question is up here for. I've never had this problem...but I have had to reinstall Windows a gazillion times. Ha!

    3. Re:Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never had an instance where having a firewall turned on kept windowsupdate from working properly.

      You haven't seen much, then. There are a few patches, that when downloaded from windowsupdate, phone home to uncle bill at wustat.microsoft.com (I presume it means windowsupdate-statistics). They will not install without an internet connection. You have to go download the patches manually as a standalone exe for them to install without an internet connection.

    4. Re:Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, and you can be even more sure about it if you use a firewall that asks you to permit/deny every single connection. That way you can make sure nothing bad gets in, and everything that's supposed to get in does get in.

    5. Re:Firewall by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you sure that someone asking this question would know what to allow in and what to disallow?

      I agree that an aplication level firewall is great. ONe that can do nat also is even better. (thats why i like iptable/netfilter so much) I am afraid that the level of knowlegde needed to be using one of them aren't the same level most users have.

      Most tech supports personel also have a default answer for not being able to download somethign and that is turn the firewall off. I have a client that is an acountant and all that needed to be done is to allow her tax software directly conect to the efile site. Thier tech support (drake software) told her to disable the firewall and anti virus in order to conect. This left a windows xp machine completly unprotected, open to the internet, with thousands of people tax information including social security number and everthign. of course it got msblast and openserve worm and i think one or 2 others. TO open the rules up took 3 clicks with a witha popular software firewall product. There is no reason to disable it on broadband internet but they defenmded it with "well she could conect afterwards couldn't she?"

      Maybe the answer is that microsoft quit pushing holes in thier code and tighten it up a little. There is alot of stuff on the windows xp install that should be left off uuntill the user needs it. How will a user know if they need it? the instruction for whatever they are doing will tell them. simple as that.

    6. Re:Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you try turning the firewall on?

      But that would be too easy, and wouldn't give us a chance to post a meaningless article allowing us to bash Microsoft!

    7. Re:firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thankx
      I learn stuff on this site everytime I visit, but I've noticed the same "guy's an ..." remarks too. They don't bother me as they are likely the guy who talks about his smelly cloth seat that reeks of butt sweat, or the turd monger goatse

  6. Easy by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 5, Informative

    We do this all the time where I work.
    Use another machine to burn a copy of the latest service pack, and the Sasser worm fix, and whatever other updates you want to include.
    After installing, install the updates from the CD, then check windows update for anything else.

  7. How do I do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    With LOVE.

  8. Kerio Personal Firewall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Learn it, love it. Free for non-commercial use, KPF rules me.

    Bla bla bla long post extra padding blapsux.

    1. Re:Kerio Personal Firewall! by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      i agree. link, by the way.

  9. Probabl redundant at this point, but... by __aavhli5779 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, a firewall and/or NAT is all you really need. Evidently Norton Internet Security did not live up to its promise, which comes as little surprise to me, I must admit.

    I've had success installing Windows XP and upgrading it with only Microsoft's Internet Connection Firewall enabled.

    1. Re:Probabl redundant at this point, but... by aheath · · Score: 1
      The original post states that software firewalls were disabled when he ran Windows updates. It does not pay to connect a computer directly to a persistent internet connection with no software or hardware firewall in place.

      I make a point to work on new Windows installs behind a NAT firewall. I've found that personal firewall software and antivirus software can interfere with other software installs from time to time.

      I generally stick to McAfee products when dealing with Windows 98 and Me. I've had some weird problems with Norton 2004 under Windows 98 and Me. I know some people who won't even touch computers that are running Windows 95/98/Me unless it is to upgrade them to Windows 2000 or Windows XP.

      The bottom line, is that we shouldn't be having this discussion in the first place. Computer vendors who build on demand could make sure that all hard drives are shipped with all of the latest Windows updates pre-installed. Computer vendors who ship with Microsoft Office pre-installed should pre-install all the Microsoft Office updates.

      I strongly recommend that anyone who has a persistent internet connection install a hardware firewall and anti-virus software. I've seen too many infected machines that were soft targets because they did not have any anti-virus software, any personal firewall software and were connected directly to a cable or DSL modem.

  10. Odd by The-Bus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about a router/firewall?

    How do you get these worms? This sounds incredulous...

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you sound incredulous.

      incredulous adj.

      Skeptical; disbelieving: incredulous of stories about flying saucers.
      Expressive of disbelief: an incredulous stare.

    2. Re:Odd by CrazyGringo · · Score: 1

      I think you mean incredible, in the sense of being a bit dubious. You and I both, however, are incredulous. It sounds like the first thing the guy is doing after the install is sharing the C drive with full permissions. :)

    3. Re:Odd by Patoski · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How do you get them? All the RPC Worms which currently inflict unpatched Windows NT based OSes is how. These worms do network sweeps and will find a vulnerable machine anywhere from a few seconds to a few minutes depending on the size of your network.

      I recall one particular instance at work where an outside laptop that was infected got plugged into the network (our network has about 2000 various boxes connected to it). Our security team got alerted by our intrusion detection systems was on the way to whack the offending user with a clue stick and unplug the laptop. Too late....

      During that time I had just finished ghosting a machine with SP4 integrated into the build. In only a matter of a minute or two the new box I was working on became infected and started doing net sweeps of its own (the whole process of infection was done silently of course). I don't doubt the tales of machines becoming infected in a very short period of time given the rate of infection with RPC based worms because I have seen it. All it takes is one rogue machine to infect other boxes it can talk to.

      --
      G. Washington on Government "it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
    4. Re:Odd by loraksus · · Score: 1

      I call it bullshit, but whatever. He's trying to say that he gets rooted in the 15 seconds that it takes from boot to windows update. Smells like fud.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    5. Re:Odd by EvanED · · Score: 1

      See this comment. Six seconds to blaster.

    6. Re:Odd by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't speak for this guy, but I've definitely been hit with some blaster variant within the first 30 seconds I plugged in. It wasn't anything I couldn't handle...that particular time I just changed the clock so it was counting down from 4 hours instead of 60 seconds, and went on about my updates. Had I wanted to bother with it, I also could have just setup a router or firwall instead.

      Anyway, it certainly can and does happen. These guys might be making the problem sound a bit too serious here, but it's still a pain in the ass.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    7. Re:Odd by ktakki · · Score: 4, Interesting
      How do you get these worms? This sounds incredulous...

      Here's a snippet of the log from my Linksys router:
      00:00:26 TCP from 200.63.154.32:4927 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:00:29 TCP from 68.219.231.103:2712 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:00:29 TCP from 200.63.154.32:4927 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:00:32 TCP from 68.219.231.103:2712 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:00:42 TCP from 68.144.136.248:3225 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:00:59 TCP from 81.185.113.170:3646 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:01:36 TCP from 68.144.169.29:2873 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:01:52 TCP from 4.41.255.6:3139 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:02:07 TCP from 200.223.92.184:4958 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:02:08 TCP from 68.94.121.110:3927 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:02:10 TCP from 200.223.92.184:4958 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:02:11 TCP from 68.94.121.110:3927 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:02:19 TCP from 81.218.207.145:4814 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:02:28 TCP from 80.198.29.151:4015 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:02:48 TCP from 63.230.237.96:3181 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:03:00 TCP from 209.50.93.166:4294 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      00:03:12 TCP from 24.80.105.49:2350 to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445
      The timestamp is hours:minutes:seconds. XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX is my WAN address (redacted), an East Coast Verizon DSL line. Port 445 is probably being targetted by W32.Sasser.

      Sixteen attempts in 3 minutes and 12 seconds.

      A couple of things are interesting about this log excerpt. First, there are no attempts from the 141.154.* netblock (where my WAN address resides). Second, I usually see a number of different ports listed (139, 1025, 1026, 1080, 3129, 5000), from both viruses and people probing for open proxies. Then again, it's Sunday night. I've noticed that virus traffic is higher during business hours in the US.

      k.
      --
      "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    8. Re:Odd by XipX · · Score: 1

      A better way is to go to the command prompt and type in "shutdown -a". It will abort the current shutdown request and allow you to continue your updates.

    9. Re:Odd by Cecil · · Score: 1

      You mean, in the 15 minutes (generous estimate) that it takes from boot to completing and installing the necessary windows updates.

      Smells like it's-happened-to-me.

    10. Re:Odd by Funksaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not as incredulous as it might seem. I use a Mac for my day to day operations - so I don't get virii or trojans or worms - but I do keep a Windows laptop around - I usually only use it when I'm travelling on the road or the mac breaks down. Well, my cable modem's out for about 24 hours, so I decide to take the laptop for a spin earlier this month - connecting to my ISP through the phone line. This, of course, bypasses the router I usually keep the Windows computer on. Without exaggeration, the computer got attacked by the sasser worm within two minutes. PCCillin caught it, but not before it did some damage. I didn't think much of it, and I was back on the Mac within days and let the computer go through a reformat. A few days later, my girlfriend's computer starts having problems - basically, the guy who put it together was a whiz with the hardware but messed up on several software related issues - he didn't install service packs, he even got the partition table wrong (Over 2/3rds of the hard drive was unpartitioned - my girlfriend was using 40 gigs of a 120 gig drive.) So, we decide to reformat and install Windows XP. Now, I'm part of a university which has a licence to software, so I can just download stuff like antivirus programs and firewalls. I decide to download the antivirus first, then the spybot, then the service packs, then the hotfixes... big mistake. After waiting hours to do a complete reformat and another couple of hours tinkering with it to get it to work right, Windows XP reboots unexpectedly then keeps rebooting. I know *exactly* what this is, but the only way to fix it is a reformat - which means that we're going to get hit with the same problems again as soon as it comes online - we have to go online to download the patches... gah! Eventually, we drove back to my place, used my macintosh to download all the patches and hotfixes and whathaveyou - and we made sure to install the firewall -first-. The firewall did the trick, of course, and we were able to get it going. I had to explain to my girlfriend how to *use* the firewall, but considering the alternative, she was very pleased. But the fact that this can happen is completely insane! When the hell will Microsoft fix their operating system? Viruses have gotten progressively worse and more destructive over the past couple of years - and Longhorn is WAY too far away from release (not that I'd want all the DRM crap on it anyway) If it wasn't for the fact that games usually don't work on Linux, I'd have told my girlfriend just to switch over that day...

    11. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a cable modem, people really get this many worm/virus connections. Some people have posted logs in other threads where they got a connection every 5-10 minutes. On my parents' connection it's more often than that. I showed it to them before explaining them how to use this "ZoneAlarm thing" on their computer. Then I put them behind a NAT as well. Next time I come home, the computer is plugged straight into the cable modem, and zonealarm has been uninstalled. WTF! /me smacks head

    12. Re:Odd by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      Nice. I don't know when the next time I need to install XP (much less on an unprotected network) but I'll definitely keep it in mind. Thanks!

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    13. Re:Odd by sumdumass · · Score: 1
      When the hell will Microsoft fix their operating system? Viruses have gotten progressively worse and more destructive over the past couple of years
      Actually they have become more automated and anoying but less destructive. i remeber the good ol days were the virus actually rewrite the files on the drives with X's or put pornagraphic phrazes in them so when you mailed youre report the boss,teacher discovered what you did with gerbals in friday nights. Some used to format the drives and blast the boot record, now they seam to open the computer up as spaming zombies or cause it to reboot. I agree with you though, it has to stop sometime. maybe when one of these script kidies selling pirated spaming machines gets pissed or finishes his education the viruses will start doing real damage again and then microsoft won't have a choice but to do somethign about it.

      then again, maybe somethign will happen and linux will start getting better game support and we can all comfortably switch for good,..
    14. Re:Odd by general_re · · Score: 1
      First, there are no attempts from the 141.154.* netblock (where my WAN address resides).

      Lucky you. I guess the former Bell Atlantic (141.x.x.x) portion of Verizon is where they send the clueful users, whereas I'm stuck with the fucktards here in former GTE-land (4.x.x.x). The last few entries in my log, about 90 seconds worth:

      4.14.164.45 TCP: 445
      4.14.51.88 TCP: 445
      4.14.116.28 TCP: 135
      194.230.209.11 TCP: 445
      81.134.88.81 TCP: 445
      219.122.144.91 TCP: 445
      82.50.44.214 TCP: 445
      68.19.44.230 TCP: 445
      64.109.56.171 TCP: 445
      4.14.180.139 TCP: 445
      64.126.189.80 TCP: 445
      4.14.162.96 TCP: 445
      219.82.96.121 TCP: 445
      65.26.38.233 TCP: 445
      4.14.109.207 TCP: 135
      4.14.49.136 TCP: 135
      4.14.114.51 TCP: 445

      All those from the 4.14.x block are on the same Verizon DSL netblock as me. As you noted, 445 is likely Sasser, and the TCP:135 probes are, likely as not, either Blaster or Nachi trying the MS RPC port...

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    15. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without exaggeration, the computer got attacked by the sasser worm within two minutes. PCCillin caught it, but not before it did some damage. I didn't think much of it, and I was back on the Mac within days and let the computer go through a reformat.

      Why do you reformat just because of the sasser worm? A friends machine got infected because he had no virus protection and no firewall (software or hardware). I simply burned all necessary patches/anti virus software onto a CD, told him he needed a firewall (bought a Linksys), and had his system back up and running in no time. No need to reinstall just because of a worm like sasser. Now if you think your machine was hacked otherwise, then I dont blame you. But thats what you get when you put a Windows machine on the net without a firewall. ;)

    16. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you sound incredulous.

      This sounds incredible.

    17. Re:Odd by danheretic · · Score: 1

      On my corporate LAN (which is a university, e.g. a gazillion different IT subgroups, all with their own philosophies of security), viruses are rampant. I always disconnect the network cable on a new install until the newest Windows updates and AV program are loaded from CD. As a test the other day, I connected the network cable prematurely. I had Sasser within 15 seconds.

  11. You missed a step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    format

  12. Get a router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why don't people pay ~30$ for a router with built in firewall? Even if one got only one PC connected to it it's worth it. No worries about worms or hacks.

    1. Re:Get a router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are practical ways, and then there are right ways. Often not the same.

      You know what I mean by right, don't you? It's not that I say I am superior... but in spite of being ordinary, I can act in a superior way.

      Why? Why bother?

      Why demanding perfection from things? That's mostly impossible, but that's what separates the craftsman, the scientist, the researcher from the engineer.

      It's a matter of choice, after all.

    2. Re:Get a router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DSL routers are great for security -- but they don't end your security worries.

      Suppose you don't patch the machine, and someone brings a worm-infested laptop into your house? Suppose that you download and run an e-mail virus?

      Everyone should have a home-DSL router, but the false sense of security that they provide to people like you is a bad thing.

    3. Re:Get a router. by perlchild · · Score: 1

      Maybe some of them have some applications they don't know how to use safely, without plugging holes the size of a house in the firewall perhaps?

      Hardware you don't know how to use is likely to be a)costly in time
      or
      b) a big paperweight

      especially in the security department

      Of course, education in this field is sadly lacking

    4. Re:Get a router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, most users aren't that savvy. We all forget that we are considered top rate gurus by the unwashed just because we can fix our own stuff, and even use Linux reasonably efficiently.

      I got a router right off the bat when I went broadband, and then stealthed all the ports, killed pings, and otherwise tightened it up. No probs here. I really feel for the common user, who is at the mercy of someone else to fix their probs.

      Of course, I change my own oil and maintain my automobile myself, but that's just me. ;-)

    5. Re:Get a router. by Bz3rk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you have been a Linux user since 95 then I'm sure setting up an old comp with IPCop or Smoothwall would be a simple solution for you.

    6. Re:Get a router. by Megane · · Score: 1

      It's the best solution... unless you're stuck with dialup. Are there even any NAT boxes with modem support other than Apple's AirPort? (which is a bit more than $30)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:Get a router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey MORON - why don't people get off their pathetic asses and SWITCH PLATFORMS?

      You guys are too much. Linux lovers? Yeah right.

    8. Re:Get a router. by areve · · Score: 1

      I've got a nice ~30$ router and I've never experienced these problems, not sure whether to believe in this article or not. What I am sure of is that I've never had a problem I wouldn't install my machine on an infected network without being very sure of my machine security. If the internet is truly this infected these days then you must have a router, or some trusted external firewall.

    9. Re:Get a router. by wobblie · · Score: 1

      Why do they bother with a crappy OS that needs one?

    10. Re:Get a router. by zitsky · · Score: 1

      Yes! The old D-Link DI-704P Revision A1 is a NAT/Firewall device that supports dial up connections. I believe the newer versions dropped the serial modem support. The A1 is a dark brown case and there will be a sticker on the bottom with the version (A, B or C). The newer B and C revisions are in silver cases.

      I bought it specifically because of the modem support. Most of the home firewall boxes I saw only had support for DSL or cable modem (ethernet). I was using this with a dial up account for more than a year. The box has autoreconnect support so it will dial up occasionally if your line drops or it detects new outbound activity.

      The one I have is the original version A1. You could probably find those on eBay.

  13. Heres a hint by Hido · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well a good way of going about this would be to download the updates from microsoft. They do provide them in binary format which you can install without having to goto the windows update site. I got a XP box as well and I do not even try to connect it to any network before I have patched all I can. Plus a firewall between you and your connection would help as well while at it :) Trying running a gateway using FreeBSD or your fav *nix OS and that would get you well on your way.

    --
    Havin' it large, livin' the life, Welcome to the land of the rising sun.
    1. Re:Heres a hint by cjellibebi · · Score: 1
      Trouble is that there are so many individual updates since the last service pack that it would take ages trying to find all of them and downloading them all. Also, if you only want to install the updates that have not been made redundant by the latest service-pack, you have to check to see if they are covered by the service-pack as well.

      One way of finding out which patches you need to download is to download the latest service-pack and a few of the most critical fixes since that service-pack (eg. the fix for the Blaster worm and fix for the Sasser worm). Download using an up-to-date Windows installation, or any other OS. When installing Windows, make sure the network-cable is unplugged, and install the service-pack and these critical patches. Then, plug the cable back in, go to Windows update, and from there, download and install all of the "critical updates" (to save time, you can un-select the MSIE-related updates and just install the OS-related updates, and after the re-boot, go to Windows update again and then install the MSIE patches that you missed out on the first time round).

      I'm not sure how safe this is, as during the searching/downloading time, your machine may be compromised using one of the lesser/known or less severe vulnerabilities. The high-profile vulnerabilities involved attackers taking control of your machine (eg. Blaster), but if you are concerned about attackers just being able to read files on your machine, or remotely crash it, I would not recommend the above method.

  14. My tip by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    Set up a firewall box (even something as simple as a linksys). Install like normal, but you're going through the firewall, so there's no direct exposure to the world. Update, patch, reboot ad nauseum without fear.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  15. Hrm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn up the firewall settings? Turn in the Windows Firewall?

    I did an out-of-box startup of a new XP machine for my mom a month or so ago no problems with just the XP firewall.

    Are you sure it's not a hardware problem?

  16. Best option (other than the obvious) by slycer9 · · Score: 1

    Other than the obligatory, 'Windoze drools Linux roxxors' kind of statement, I'd advise you to download the updates separately, burn them to a CD/DVD from another previously patched machine (or a Linux box) and use THAT medium to apply the updates to your new install.

    --
    Don't park drunk, accidents cause people.
    1. Re:Best option (other than the obvious) by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      My local whitebox store does it this way too. They built a box for a customer and went to M$ to update it and caught 27 virii in 2 min. Downloaded the updates to a protected computer, burned the CD and installed. Now they have a CD of all updates for every version of Win they deal with.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    2. Re:Best option (other than the obvious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the next round of major exploits comes out, and then they're just as vulnerable.

      Sorry, it's time to stop being shortsighted and get a fscking firewall in the mix.

    3. Re:Best option (other than the obvious) by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      I normally don't respond to AC's but if you read what I wrote "a protected computer" you might understand that it not only has a firewall, but is running F-Prot, which is the best antivirus I've seen. Pay attention then comment with a name. Few care about AC's.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    4. Re:Best option (other than the obvious) by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Just because F-Prot is the "underdog" in anti-virus popularity doesnt mean its the best or latest and greatest. Sure, it makes for a nice DOS bootcd where you need to clean a machine onsite. But, I'm all for Symantec Norton. It's consumer client may be bloated with features, but it's damn well effective. (Norton firewall sucks ass though). If you want all the effectiveness and research of Symantec but witout the bloated client, get the corporate edition. It's fucking awsome.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Best option (other than the obvious) by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      I like norton Internet security. With ad blocking on you'd be amazed at how fast pages load. I have caught things with F-Prot that Norton AV has missed, so I like it better. I try to run what works, much more important than the company or it's size.

      dual boot RH9 and WinXP. Linux is for serious work, XP is for games.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  17. simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can download the sp1 and save it to disc if i remember. then install it from there.how about going through a server, like dont directly connect it to the internet.

  18. Firewall by fremen · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...all firewalls are turned off.

    Why don't you try turning the firewall on? It will block the RPC calls that are necessary to infect your machine with the most recent series of worms and allow you to install whatever patches are necessary worry free.

    Plus, it just makes your PC safer in general.

  19. Use NAT by hkb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Duh.

    Perhaps also turning on the firewall just actually might work. Windows is targeted for the average Joe. Microsoft doesn't want to have to incur the support costs of explaining to average Joe how firewalls work, so they suggest you keep it off.

    If you've really been using Linux that long, you'd have a clue. Really, this submission just sounds like a troll...

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    1. Re:Use NAT by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      The update may be using any number of ports that would be blocked by a firewall. I've no idea why they would or should, but if so, it would make it rather hard to update with the firewall turned on. Of course, as at least one other poster mentioned, the firewall doesn't really have any effect on the update. Probably just NanoLimp setting up their instructions so that J. Random Luser can follow them and turning things off always seems safer to lusers than turning them on.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Use NAT by tpearson · · Score: 1

      He is using a firewall, just not the Windows one. He said that the Norton installer told him not to use the built in one.

    3. Re:Use NAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft doesn't want to have to incur the support costs of explaining to average Joe how firewalls work, so they suggest you keep it off.

      Same thing happened when I signed up for DSL, then calling their tech support in order to activate the connection. The lady (yes, it's a female) says turn off the ICF during the procedure to set up a PPPoE connection in XP. Bullocks if you ask me. Good thing I'm using a router to do connect, so I just complied silently, and then delete the icon afterwards.

      I'll have to admit that she's just following the instructions set by somebody else, but still... it stupid.

    4. Re:Use NAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I realize that these instructions are meant to be for the slightly more clueless among us, suggesting that someone use NAT for security is just downright evil. The only thing that makes NAT secure is essentially that it acts as a firewall, because the 1 to many mapping makes direct connections impossible without explicit port forwarding (which implies explicit consent on the user's part.) Compare this to a classical firewall, which when properly configured drops everything but what the user specifically allows. Essentially the end-result is the same -- allow packets you know, disallow packets you don't -- but without the evil hack that is NAT.

      I use NAT, of course, if I have a lot of computers that I need to hide behind one IP address. However, understand that the security benefits of NAT are basically just because its operation forces it to accidentally act as a firewall, just with less flexibility when it comes to dealing with packets (essentially only accept/drop).

      Just use a firewall. And instruct others to "use a firewall". Saying "use NAT" just propogates the misconception that NAT is a security device, which it most certainly is not. People that believe that NAT is secure because it is NAT are the people that say we don't need IPv6 because reducing people's dependence on NAT would make the internet less secure. These people are both wrong and god cursed stupid. Don't be one of them, even accidentally.

  20. loose wire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems more likely you have a dodgy connection or overheat problem than a virus there. Did you detect a virus with Norton or are the shutdowns/reboots all you base this on?

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Elisa makes this even harder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elisa is a Finnish ISP.
    If Elisa detects a lot of packets coming from someone's computer, they give a warning to the web browser (making Windows Update unusable) and later closing the connection. Needless to say, this makes updating the system really hard, since as soon as Lovsan or other worm infects the system (takes about five minutes) and starts sending itself to other IPs, you're unable to update your system.

    Yeah, you can use firewall (Windows update works with them, I think), but there are people who get one from the net.

    Ridiculous, and I'm sure Elisa has heard some complains about that system a couple of times :/

  23. you need a router by doorbender · · Score: 1

    I use a little four port router i got from Wal-mart for $50. I logged onto it using the instructions that came with it and configured it to be connected as needed and used its firewall. I have installed winXP on 6 machines and none of them have gotten a virus. None of the machines I networked on the job have gotten viruses either and all have been behind the exact same $50 wal-mart purchased brand named router with DHCP and firewall enabled.

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
    1. Re:you need a router by doorbender · · Score: 1

      also (on these networks) sometimes I turn off the windows firewall for filesharing to win98 machines. some XP boxes had this off for months and i have never had a problem with it. But now having announced that to the world I will be doublechecking that I have it enabled everywhere. (not that I felt it would really do any good but on the off chance it might)

      --
      "He's a real midnight golfer"
    2. Re:you need a router by CrazyGringo · · Score: 2, Funny

      We should just put the whole internet behind a firewall. Problem solved. :) On a more serious note, can you imagine the kind of trouble we'll have with IPV6? I'll be arrested because my toaster was hijacked and launched a DOS on army.mil

  24. Install XP with a network connection by benwb · · Score: 1

    XP really doesn't have any services running while it installs, so it's reasonably safe. If it detects a network connection it will download an updated set of installation files that include all of the latest critical updates.

  25. shutdown -a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If its the rpc exploit, telling you windows will shut down in 59 seconds, then you go to the command prompt, and type shutdown -a (abort the shutdown) and all will be well until you can finish downloading the updates.

  26. Simple, Get an external Router. by kevlar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Barring the fact that I don't believe you when you say that you get viruses over the 20 minutes that it takes to download and install the patches, the fix is simple: get some sort of router/firewall combo, or install a soft firewall before doing the update.

    Alternatively, shut down all the services so that you have nothing listening, but if you're too lazy to do that, go out and spend $40 on a Netgear router and voila, you're safe from that crap.

    1. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by yamla · · Score: 4, Informative

      You don't believe you can get infected in 20 minutes? The record at the undergraduate department of Computing Science at the University of Alberta is SIX SECONDS from plugging in an installed, unprotected Windows XP system until the time it is infected.

      It is highly unlikely that you could run an unprotected XP system with no firewall and no patches, hooked up via a cable modem or ADSL, for even ten minutes before getting infected.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    2. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by tomakaan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If definitely believe him. I've seen it happen all the time. My situation may be unique since I'm on a large college network, but I've seen blaster/welchia/gaobot/sasser infect a machine in a quarter of that time without the proper Windows Updates.

    3. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by kevlar · · Score: 1

      College network I could believe, but on a network like road runner, its less believable. I believe it happenned once or twice, but I can't see it happenning everytime he does an install.

    4. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      Barring the fact that I don't believe you when you say that you get viruses over the 20 minutes that it takes to download and install the patches, the fix is simple.

      The internet's not the only means of getting a virus on a nice clean build - even if you're using all legitimate install CDs.

      Make sure things like you don't have a virus stuck somewhere other than your OS' file system. Getting a virus within 20 minutes each time sounds more like you've got something stuck in your Master Boot Record or wherever that's simply returning with every reinstall.

    5. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't believe you when you say that you get viruses over the 20 minutes that it takes

      Aside from the terminology, consider that at the peak of infection, many nimda attacks were being logged EVERY SECOND by logging machines setup for capturing and monitoring attacks. Slammer was scanning 55 million hosts PER SECOND. These things just pick random addresses and spit data out. If you haven't been getting any of these hits then either you're behind a firewall, or you're less random than the rest of the internet.

      20 minutes is a long time to go without protection in computer time, especially on today's wild west of an internet.

      Agreed though, the questioner should have just gone and gotten a firewall (or used one of his linux machines). I've never seen anything on windows update suggest that I turn off my firewall.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    6. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by kevlar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually.... jusdging by my router logs, I can believe it now...

      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:12:54 Unrecognized access from 24.164.33.43:9118 to UDP port 1026
      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:16:48 Unrecognized access from 218.88.103.123:3822 to TCP port 1025
      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:16:51 Unrecognized access from 218.88.103.123:3822 to TCP port 1025
      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:16:57 Unrecognized access from 218.88.103.123:3822 to TCP port 1025
      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:21:46 Unrecognized access from 195.250.112.73:35973 to TCP port 443
      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:22:18 Unrecognized access from 222.183.185.252:3881 to TCP port 1025
      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:22:21 Unrecognized access from 222.183.185.252:3881 to TCP port 1025
      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:22:27 Unrecognized access from 222.183.185.252:3881 to TCP port 1025
      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:31:26 Unrecognized access from 193.227.0.37:3365 to UDP port 1434
      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:45:50 Unrecognized access from 24.164.31.171:8860 to UDP port 1026

    7. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by Lusa · · Score: 1

      I'd believe it. Looking at the last 18 hours of my firewall logs I have had 1084 connection attempts on port 445 alone which has a remote exploitable vulnerability. Thats on average one attempt per a minute!

    8. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My firewall logs show that I get worm propagation attempts at a significant rate, sometimes dozens per second (you can hear the drive in my firewall machine chattering when that happens.) Mind you, I'm on Comcast and there's a bunch of machines on my subnet that are infected as hell (I've reported this to Comcast, but the same IPs keep showing up, sometimes with attempts from multiple worms!) but I have no problem believing that this dude got infected in twenty minutes. I'm surprised it took even that long. Last year, my cousin hooked up her Win2K box to her brand, spanking new cable modem. After two or three minutes, a console window popped up and she watched some nut case typing in "SECEDIT" trying to guess her admin password. Things happen FAST nowadays.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by 87C751 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Getting a virus within 20 minutes each time sounds more like you've got something stuck in your Master Boot Record or wherever that's simply returning with every reinstall.
      My personal record is less than 3 minutes after the first network-connected boot, while downloading round 1 of the Win2000 updates, on a heavily firewalled corporate intranet that unfortunately has some less than thoroughly careful users in outlying areas (read: people in the Far East divisions that move their laptops from home to work and back). Besides, when one boots from a CD and nukes/recreates the whole partition structure as part of the build process, lingering MBR problems aren't much of an issue.

      Aside: has there ever been a post-NT MBR virus? I can't recall any MBR infectors since the boot-from-floppy days.

      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    10. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:31:26 Unrecognized access from 193.227.0.37:3365 to UDP port 1434
      Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:45:50 Unrecognized access from 24.164.31.171:8860 to UDP port 1026

      ^^ RIGHT THERE! That was 14 minutes! You could have EASILY installed a few critical updates. You just need to install them between attacks, and unplug your network cable before each new attack starts.

      How hard is that? What is everyone here complaining about?

    11. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehehehe. better get a faster puter, and a really fast connection then.

    12. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 1

      Hah. A little while ago, I installed Microsoft's SQL server just to see how quickly I would get infected by Slammer. What can I say, I'm a curious guy. Plus I was planning on reformatting the box anyway. With my software firewall enabled (and set to warn me about any traffic), I signed on over my dialup and within five seconds, I had a warning that the SQL server was sending out packets to somewhere.

      Five. Seconds.

      On dialup.

      I've never been infected on a clean install of Windows xp in that short a time, but that's because I've got all the updates on a CD I refresh each month, I've got a good hardware and software firewall, and I've got an up-to-date virus scanner (again, updates are burned to CD every month).

    13. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      193.227.0.37:3365 to UDP port 1434 Sunday, June 20, 2004 20:45:50 Unrecognized access from 24.164.31.171:8860 to UDP port 1026

      Who's IPs are this????
      And why are they on slashdot.

    14. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I guess you could pull a riaa and claim that the regular ip adress is attemping to "break the encrytion technoligy" you are using to secure your computer and it therefore puts him in violation of the DMCA and you want his name adress and all like riaa does. I guess if they deny it to you then you might even be able to sue for money or something.

      Once you get the name and adress of the customer, send him a letter via snail mail or drive overe to his house and then throw a brick with a bollt of flaim gasoline thru his window next to the computer.. NO really just knock on the door and call him an ass then kick him in the balls and tell him if hen doesn't get his computer fixed it will happen again.. or better yet, don'ty do any of that and take hime to small claimes court ($35) claiing that his virus infected machine caused damage to your machine and you would like compesation for the time and effort required becuase of his negligent actions reguarding his computer/s. after you get the money (or the judge laughs you out of court) buy him an av scanner and tell him about the first to options that you were thinking about doing.

      problem should be solved.. if not, then pound some nails thu the anti-virus box and then pound them into the tires of his cars until they loose air. he will eventually get the idea. BTW you could probably get some neiborhood kids to do this for some beer of a joint or somethign.. they are cheep here were i live.

    15. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20:26:00,80.218.85.202:1035,X.X.X.X:445,TCP (flags:S)
      20:26:10,83.88.204.51:1038,X.X.X.X:137, UDP
      20:26:18,151.197.235.162:61750,X.X.X.X:445,TC P (flags:S)
      20:26:20,151.197.235.162:62014,X.X.X.X: 445,TCP (flags:S)
      20:26:24,151.197.235.162:62241,X.X.X.X: 445,TCP (flags:S)
      20:26:26,83.88.93.162:3122,X.X.X.X:445, TCP (flags:S)
      20:26:46,82.51.87.150:3049,X.X.X.X:445, TCP (flags:S)
      20:26:48,83.88.204.51:1197,X.X.X.X:137, UDP

      A small snip from 1, yes one, minutes activity om my firewall on my fathers ADSL connection (no router)! And you call that no problem?
      The solution to the problem was a cheap D-link DI-604 router and presto no hits at all.

    16. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      I found the only solution to stopping Nimda spreading at my old school was to cut the power in the computer room, take the key to the power switch, and lock the door. AND unplugging the switches. That was enough to keep the upstairs computer room clean while I fixed the downstairs machines.

      On a serious note, it did completely fill the hard drive of the file server in 4 hours. It was a great piece of work, but if I get to the developer, he won't be around much longer.

    17. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by wfberg · · Score: 1

      That's why scriptkiddies hack into your box via a pre-rooted box that they do not own.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    18. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by ajay63 · · Score: 1

      Heh, I remember looking in the system manager and if the (fifo) for the hard drive had an error, it probably was a MBR Virus. LOL. It has been some time though hasn't it?

    19. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by Phred+T.+Magnificent · · Score: 1

      I'm on Comcast, too. For a the longest time, 2/3 of the entries in my Apache logs were from Code Red and similar worms trying to infect my nonexistent IIS server. That doesn't happen anymore, mainly because I pulled out the two dozen or so IP addresses that were sending all of the attack traffic and blocked all of them at the firewall. (I do still get the occasional attempt on port 445, though.)

      Now, I can't in good conscience recommend installing Windows XP at all, but if you were to do such a thing, the ONLY reasonably safe ways to do it is to install and patch from behind a good firewall, or to install and patch on a machine with no network connection at all.

      --
      Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
      Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?
    20. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by doorbender · · Score: 1

      my wifes uncles PC was online unprotected (by a router or switch)for 3 days(i consider it a miracle) and _nothing_ happened to his PC.

      --
      "He's a real midnight golfer"
    21. Re:Simple, Get an external Router. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well ... nothing that you know about anyway. And yeah, I'd consider it a miracle.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  27. Built in firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I usually use the built in firewall on XP. Even though it's a MS product, I haven't had a single virus / worm get in while doing updates using the built in firewall. I guess that will keep working until there's a bug found in it...

    1. Re:built in firewall by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      i meant to add this "ask slashdot" sounds vaguely trollish...10 seconds on google could have solved your issues

    2. Re:built in firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, that will help and I have seen it help for about 3 months or so on a XP machine, then some bloody virus does get through and zaps the machine. There is a window (TM) of opportunity between startup and starting the firewall, where the machine is vulnerable. The only way to keep a Windows machine completely safe, is to use a Linux firewall - Linksys, Dlink etc.

  28. You don't need Norton or anything... by lylum · · Score: 1

    Turn on the firewall that comes with Windows XP. It at least protects you from worms infecting your system while you download updates.

  29. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    properties of the network connection -> TCP/IP -> properties -> advanced -> options -> tcp/ip filtering -> properties -> enable -> permit only the tcp ports you need for the updates ...

    you can figure that out at least, can't you ? :(

  30. Install firewall before going online by bugmenot · · Score: 1

    Use logic and common sense, unplug the machine install a firewall then get it online and download the updates. XP even has some sort of built in firewall. Also lots of cable modems have a lock button on them, when you press it traffic is supressed.

    --
    This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
  31. Dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, boot into linux. Download all the patches you need. Save them to the win32 partition. Disconnect the network and reboot into win. Read the patches from the win32 partition and install. Restore the network.

    Was that really so hard to think of? Are some kind of idiot? Sheeez.

  32. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can always burn some of the updates to CD on a different machine so that you can go straight to SP1 and whatever norton updates before it's plugged in.

    I'd suggest turning on XP firewall, skipping norton (which isn't that great anyway), and trying from there.

    I'm not sure where you are, but it shouldn't be /that/ bad... you can always try to install from behind a NAT (linksys/dlink/whatever router), too, that might help.

    When done, head to housecall.antivirus.com and do a free virus scan.

  33. Where from? by FoolsRun · · Score: 1

    Where exactly are these viruses you're getting coming from? Without an email client installed, and without navigating to any shady websites between install and patch, I don't understand how your computer could have been infected. It's not like Viruses just appear on unpatched computers, they have to be let in somehow. -- M

    1. Re:Where from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From worms that get in through the numerous security holes announced in the past. You don't have to run a file to get a virus anymore. :(

    2. Re:Where from? by almostmanda · · Score: 1

      Let me plug your computer into any campus LAN. Sasser, Nachi, etc. will be on your computer before you can say "go."

    3. Re:Where from? by FoolsRun · · Score: 2

      pretty smart worms if they can find your connection in the twenty minutes it takes before you can patch. I don't disbelieve the author, but it does seem like a match to start a Microsoft bashfest when it seems more like a case of significantly bad luck to me. I run XP and I've installed and reinstalled XP on numerous machines both NAT routed and otherwise and never had a virus problem before I could patch. -- M

    4. Re:Where from? by kunudo · · Score: 1

      Where exactly are these viruses you're getting coming from? Without an email client installed, and without navigating to any shady websites between install and patch, I don't understand how your computer could have been infected. It's not like Viruses just appear on unpatched computers, they have to be let in somehow. -- M

      Ever heard of sasser? It infects directly over the network. How you missed that one is beyond me...

    5. Re:Where from? by climberkid · · Score: 1

      Yes, with the holes in windows, and all of the infected machines everywhere, viruses do just appear....rough but true. Viruses like Sasser and Blaster, Nimda etc.

    6. Re:Where from? by saroth2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not true, a worm needs no user intervention in order to infect a computer. Think Sasser .

    7. Re:Where from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While email is the vector of choice for MS worms, there are vulnerabilities in the other parts of Windows that let in viruses to someone running port scans, etc.

    8. Re:Where from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many viri that don't require user action to spread. RPC and DCOM viri spread this way. People on the internet scan for vulnerable machines and then strike when they see one. The only way to prevent it is to get the patch from Windows Update or to be behind a NAT or firewall.

    9. Re:Where from? by EvanED · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Where from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It depends on the ISP connection and IP address block you got. My servers get scanned about once every ten minutes, my wife's about once every 5 minutes and the two offices are just a few kilometers apart on different DSLAMs. Iptables, tcpwrappers and portsentry keeps them safe, but there is no way to keep a Windoze box completely safe - you need to hide it behind a Linux firewall.

      The trouble with the Windoze firewall, is that it doesn't get activated soon enough at startup, so if the user regularly powers down/up then eventually he will get a worm.

  34. Worst case scenario by gwoodrow · · Score: 4, Funny

    So the WORST case scenario is that you don't actually succeed in getting Windows installed? Man, talk about a win-win situation!

    1. Re:Worst case scenario by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 1

      No no no... it is a NO-Win situation.

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    2. Re:Worst case scenario by eyepeepackets · · Score: 1

      Woot-woot! That was so funny my jaws are aching. It's especially funny since my comment the other day about MS products being infected right out of the box was labeled as flamebait when anyone with any real world knowledge and experience with MS product knows that, for all practical purposes, what I said is true.

      This particular article make me wish for a "Funny Only" filter so I can get all the wag's comments in one stream. How 'bout it /. folks?

      Oh yeah, before I forget: Cool site you have there, nice design work with interesting reading material.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
  35. It's easy by cens0r · · Score: 1

    I have a cd-rw with avg antivirus and kerio personal firewall. I load windows with the ethernet unplugged. Then I load up the firewall. then I plug the ethernet back in and do the windows update. I have no problems doing the update through the firewall.

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    1. Re:It's easy by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the whole point of the article was that: Ms says to disable the fw.

      the updating works through the fw and xp even has built-in one you can use, so why the hell are they recommending turning it off?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:It's easy by lewp · · Score: 1

      They're recommending that you disable all firewalls, I think. This is probably to avoid support calls from people who shit themselves when say, Norton or Zone Alarm lets them know about Windows Update trying to access the network.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    3. Re:It's easy by cens0r · · Score: 1

      The firewall does complain when windows xp tries to grab the updates, but as long as you know what you're doing you just click allow.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  36. built in firewall by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

    before connecting the ethernet cable or connecting to an AP, enable the built in firewall

    control panel
    network connections
    right click the connection
    advanced tab
    check the box

  37. Close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like you have a good start and the only thing I can think of is putting your computer behind NAT (Cheap router) or a hardware firewall as this will not allow any software bugs to be exploted.

    AC: To lazy to get an account

  38. a Troll FP in response to a Troll Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    how fitting

  39. Install cleanly by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    For a home system, I usually do the following:

    1) Install with the network/modem cable unplugged.
    2) Once on the desktop, go into network properties and enable the built in firewall on all applicable devices.
    3) Connect to internet and obtain patches.
    4) Profit!!

    Its much simpler with a hardware firewall/router protecting you.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  40. buffer the Windows box by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

    Put a "buffer" between the windows computer and the cable modem, either a hardware firewall/router or a linux/*BSD gateway server with iptables or pf running.

    But before you go (re)install windows, download the "network install" of the service pack with another computer and copy it to a CD for use when you reinstall windows. Load up the firewall, AV, and SP before giving it the network connection. I personally haven't dealt with win XP-SP1, but just leave the software firewall on.....or doesn't matter if it's behind the buffer.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  41. Windows Firewall by tomakaan · · Score: 1

    I've always turned the Windows software firewall on before running the windows update. It's kept me clean so far and I've never run into the problem. It's the simplest solution considering it's already there. No hardware/software setup or difficult CDs!

  42. Slipstream it! by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2, Informative
    Easy... I would Slipstream a copy of Windows SP1 or SP2 onto a burned CD, so that the windows I install is a fresh copy that's not suseptible to worms off the bat.

    Even better, I would get a hardware firewall, so that none of the ports that worms travel through are even open.

    Basic security from automated attacks isn't particularly hard, you know. Why is this even on slashdot?

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  43. Download the Service pack before install by borwells · · Score: 4, Informative

    Download the SP1 Network install before beginning your XP installation. Stick it on a CD or a Samba share and install it prior to connecting to the Internet.

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
    1. Re:Download the Service pack before install by pyrrhonist · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Download the SP1 Network install before beginning your XP installation. Stick it on a CD or a Samba share and install it prior to connecting to the Internet .

      Figuring out how to do this with only one machine and no installed OS is left as an exercise for the reader.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    2. Re:Download the Service pack before install by JKR · · Score: 1
      So you have no internet connected friends, no white-collar job, and no net cafe?

      Fine, WRITE to MS and ask them to send it to you on a CDROM, for the princely sum of about $3.00 shipping.

      Jon.

    3. Re:Download the Service pack before install by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      I said that it was left as an exercise for the reader. Now you ruined the exercise for everyone by blurting out the answer.

      Seriously, it was a joke. Uh, an, "Insightful", joke apparently.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  44. External firewall? by pilkul · · Score: 5, Informative
    You say you're a Linux user; why not plug one of your Linux boxes to the 'net, use it as NAT-routing firewall using iptables, and download the updates from behind the firewall? It's always worked for me. Or if you only have one machine, you can buy a cheap NAT router for 50$ nowadays.

    This solution seems so obvious to me that I wonder why you even bothered to ask. With your apparent technical knowledge, surely you must've thought of this. I'm inclined to think this question was just a veiled way to start an article bashing Microsoft about all the worms affecting their system.

    1. Re:External firewall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm inclined to think this question was just a veiled way to start an article bashing Microsoft about all the worms affecting their system.

      And what if it was? It's still a valid question, and Microsoft still deserves bashing.

      I haven't used Windows much since 3.1 and I'm terrified of it. I usually work on FreeBSD and Macs, but occasionally I need to fire up Windows .. I do it ONLY in VMWare, on a private host-only network, accessing the web through a proxy. I have NO idea what all the ports are and which have to be open to get updates, I feel like any data I put into it will be saved and broadcasted to the world via a worm that gets in somehow through the proxy.. yeah it's kinda nutty but to use Windows these days means you either 1) have proficiency with Windows, or 2) be oblivious to even the most obvious details of computers and the internet. I fall into neither category, and I imagine the same is true of the poster, so I just assume the worst.

      I don't claim that FreeBSD or Linux is inherently more secure, but I know how to set the firewall so I cvsup or emerge the updates as appropriate.

    2. Re: External firewall? by The+Rizz · · Score: 1
      you can buy a cheap NAT router for 50$ nowadays

      Actually, if you're willing to do some rebates, you can generally get wireless 802.11b routers for about $20.
      Every one of these I've seen also has a 4-port 10/100 switch built in.

      Just remember to set up wireless security or, if you have no wireless devices, turn the wireless connections off entirely.

      --The Rizz

      "Some men are alive simply because it is against the law to kill them." --Ed Howe

    3. Re: External firewall? by Sesticulus · · Score: 0

      Even cheaper, co-worker just got a wireless b 4 port w/ NAT, normal stuff, for $10 with rebate. At that price, next year they will be putting routers in Frosted Flakes boxes as kiddie toys.

  45. DUH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "11. Start to pull down Service Pack One; per Microsoft's instructions, all firewalls are turned off."

    Has MS ever been right? Leave them on, the download will work fine.

    Of course you will get a worm if you turn them all off... Geez.

  46. Here's my checklist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. Install behind hardware firewall.
    2. Submit article to Slashdot that amounts to a backhanded slam against XP disguised as a question from somebody who is a novice.
    3. Watch the flames on a wasted sunday night.

  47. A joke? by BlindSpy · · Score: 1

    Its pretty sad that it's almost kind of comical that this kind of stuff goes on with the #1 operating system. What does the everyday user (like our grandparents) do when they have to install XP... they dont have slashdot to come to for help. It's really sick that they can even charge for a product as poorly protected as Windows. There's a lot of respondsibility with being Microsoft and honestly, I dont think they have what it takes to handle it.

    --
    Whoever dies with the most toys wins.
    1. Re:A joke? by doorbender · · Score: 1

      if my parents are installing an OS without my help someone needs to kick me in the @ss

      --
      "He's a real midnight golfer"
    2. Re:A joke? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      What does the everyday user (like our grandparents) do when they have to install XP...

      They don't. They either have a machine it was preinstalled on, or they take it into a computer shop because it's "broken".

  48. well the answer is easy.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    DON'T DO AS MS SUGGESTS! if you do everything as they tell you, you will get burnt.. that's kinda sad when you think about it.

    have the fw up.

    however, the last time I installed win2k pro at my parents place I couldn't find a way to turn the (built in, filter thingy)fw on for an isdn dialup - and had no cd's or things like that with any fw at hand, didn't get infected in the few minutes it took to get external fw program downloaded(i opted for kerio). and downloading the updates when paying per minute.. no chance jose, better just lock it up, purge ie and outlook with xplite and install firefox as the browser.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  49. use a nat router firewall by bstil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All you need for a home installation is a NAT firewall connected to your cable modem/dsl. As long as your firewall is properly configured and no other computer on your NAT network is infected, you should be okay.

    1. Re:use a nat router firewall by Bobzibub · · Score: 1

      Yep. Use NAT even after you update. There are zero day Windoze exploits out there now....

      Mine is a Pentium 100, /w PCI bus and 2 nics, average hard drive and IPCop. The system works nice and you should probably keep any Windoze box behind a NAT firewall all the time anyway.

      http://www.ipcop.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/IPCop/We bH ome

      IPcop is nice. DHCP service, DMZ service, easy updating, ez web based interface, straight forward install and more. Make sure your nics are all PCI for easiest install though. My load on my P100 is typically around .6 so it might be a wee bit underpowered.

      Cheers,
      -b

  50. Visit Windows Update ON ANOTHER COMPUTER by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    Simply put... an out of the box installation of Windows XP is NOT safe to put on the Internet. When you are first booting it, you have to patch it before letting it touch the Internet. You need to get the Windows Update patches onto the computer before it's allowed online.

    The way to do this is with another computer that's already online... Go to Windows Update and under the "Other Options" category select the checkbox for "Display the link to the Windows Update Catalog Under See Also" and then click "Save Settings". Under the "See Also" heading "Windows Update Catelog" will appear, click on it. This will lead you to a place where you can download all of the secuirity updates and/or service patches you need in a way that'll allow you to burn them to CD and take them to the new computer. The most critical package to obtain is Service Pack 1 (shorthanded as "SP1" on the site), because that will be a cumulative patch that'll save you several one-off packages.

    1. Re:Visit Windows Update ON ANOTHER COMPUTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way to do this is with blah blah that's already blah blah... Go to Windows Update and under the "blah blah" category select the checkbox for "Display the link to the blah blah blah Under See Also" and then click "blah blah". Under the "See Also" heading "blah blah blah" will appear, click on it. This will lead you to a place where you can blah blah all of the blah blah and/or blah blah you blah blah a way that'll allow you to blah blah blah blah blah and take them to the new blah blah. The most critical package to obtain is blah blah (shorthanded as "SP1" on the blah blah), because that will be a blah blah blah that'll save you several blah blah blahs.

      Or, just check the little "Protect my computer" box in your network properties before plugging in your network cable for the first time.

  51. The way I do it by Apreche · · Score: 1

    Get all of the service packs, hotfixes and critical updates and put them on a CD. Install windows with no net connection. Install all the hotfixes and updates. Install a firewall program like sygate or zonealarm. Better yet, be behind some network level security like a real firewall or a proxy or something. THEN connect the net connection.

    All of those norton/symantec anti-virus programs are bullshit. Up until last week I was a dual-booter. I ran completely standard windows XP but I had every windows update in existence. I didn't use Outlook or IE. Actually I used IE for one purpose, Windows Update. I set the windows update to notify me when there were changes, but not install them automatically. My computer is at a college. A LAN with hundreds and hundreds of machines directly connected by ethernet. Possibly the most dangerous place it can possibly be. I only got a virus once when I installed with the net connection on and tried to race the clock to windows update.

    There's a reason that I stopped using windows altogether last week :)

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:The way I do it by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Up until last week I was a dual-booter.

      Good for you. It's difficult to admit when you have a problem. I know, I used to be a dual-booter too, and it was tough. I used to make up excuses, "It's only a small partition; it's not hurting anyone." I didn't realize the effect this had on my loved ones. Thanks to Dual-Booters Anonymous, though, I got help, and I've been clean for five years. Best of luck.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    2. Re:The way I do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome back to a Windows-only world.

    3. Re:The way I do it by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      I dual boot with pride.

      Except OS 9 is being booted very often anymore.....

  52. This is why Linux is a bad thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too much security with Linux, it lulls you into a false sense of safety. With Windows you have to be on your toes. Linux users would get eaten alive if the virus writers turned their full attention on them, they wouldn't know what to do!!!

  53. For the love of god... by alyandon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just turn on the internal XP firewall (Network Properties -> -> Properties -> Advanced) before you connect to the net. You'll be safe long enough to get SP1/Kerio/etc all downloaded and installed.

    1. Re:For the love of god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "-> ->" from above should be "-> LAN or Dialup Connectoid icon ->"

  54. firewall or CD by Cyberop5 · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I'm forced to build an XP box on an unsecured network, I leave it offline until the install is done, enable the integrated windows firewall, plug the CAT 5 in, and fetch the updates. The built in firewall is typically good enough to fend off blaster, nachi, etc. After that, I install antivirus then Zone Alarm and disable the integrated firewall. Whenever possible, run behind a hardware firewall and you won't have this problem.

    If you have another windows XP box, you can use the corporate windows update to download all the patches and service packs to CD and update the system offline.

    FYI, if you do get infected, running "shutdown -a" from the command dialog (windows+R) will abort the 1-minute shutdown timer.

    --
    Urgo: "I want to live. I want to experience the universe and I want to eat pie!"
    Jack: "Who doesn't??"
  55. Slipstreaming by climberkid · · Score: 1

    Probably not the most efficient way, but if you have to reinstall often, you could invest the time setting up a bootable slipstreamed disk with sp1 already in the OS, you can dl the updates from MS and set those to install as well. In addition to this, you can create a full unattended install, allowing you to not be present at the time. A simple googling of "unattended windows" should hook you up.

  56. Hardware "firewall" by azulcactus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As of now I have performed only a couple reinstalls in the past couple years but never have had an incident of getting "owned" before installing my patches. I have a Netgear MR314 router that I make sure to turn all port forwarding off before putting a "naked" box on the network. Sure, it isn't fool proof and I would not consider it a firewall, but the nature of NAT does a sufficient job of blocking unrequested packets from coming in. After Windows installs I turn of superfluous services (such as messenger), install anti virus software from cd, plug in the network connection and then update that and Windows.

    Of course if your problem is most hardware routers will not work with your ISP, then this tactic is not going to work well.

    1. Re:Hardware "firewall" by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      wow ... I didn't know windows XP was that easy to get into. Ive always just installed my windows and updated it when it was convienent for me. I never got smoked by anything.

      Is the internet that bad now.

      oh well ... I remember using Windows ME as my NAT box with ICS (it was cheap and a easy way to get some computers I was fixing on the internet.

      fuck ... id hate to be a fucker who leaves his machine with no protection on the internet.

  57. Re:IP Theft and The Linux Community by borwells · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Are you implying that no one ever does anything illegal with Microsoft software?

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Autopatcher! by calebb · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can't believe nobody's posted this yet!

    Autopatcher

    AutoPatcher was started in October of 2003. It was started by Jason Kelley and was a simple batch program that would install many updates silently. Upon reaching version 2.65, Jason was contacted by Antonis Kaladis, who offered to help make a VB front-end for the program. And thus, the current incarnation of AutoPatcher was born.

    Not only does it install all your Windows updates with just one reboot, it can also (optionally) install many other programs such as the Windows XP Powertoys, IESpell, etc. There's even some registry config options such as increasing the max connections per server (IE) to something greater than 2.

    1. Re:Autopatcher! by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1

      Autopatcher XP is for Windows XP with Service Pack 1 or 1a. It won't help you if you don't have these installed yet (i.e. new installation from original XP disk).

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  60. Burn to CD by karniv0re · · Score: 1

    One way I can think of off the top of my head is to get the updates through a source other than Windows Update (I just d/l'd XP's SP2 RC2 on Bit Torrent) via Linux, or a patched Win box. While you're at it, download Norton's latest virus definitions. Then just burn them to a CD, or use a USB drive. This could work if the problem occurs while going online unpatched.

    You should probably also talk to your provider. They should be blocking certain ports that are known to be used by worms and trojans.

  61. Don't beleive it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just keep trying the same method. how many times can a 1000-1 shot happen to the same guy?

  62. i'm installing right now... by phrasebook · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm putting XP on my laptop next to me right now actually. I think it is pretty safe because a) it is connected to the net using NAT, not directly to the modem and b) I slipstreamed SP1 into my XP CD, so that when I install it I'm already at SP1 level. See here for instructions (that's win2k, but same for winxp of course). And I dunno why you'd bother with Norton Anything quite frankly. Maybe you can just buy a cheap router doing NAT and put it between the modem and computer while you get updates.

    1. Re:i'm installing right now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll see how not running Nortn anything works for you when Outlook auto-installs the next mass-email worm.

      Got Windows? Connect to any other system, ever, including using removable media? You need antivirus software.

      It amazes me that people think they're somehow an isolated little island. "Oh, nobody will infect me, I'm too small."

      As for Norton firewall, systemworks, yada yada yada? Yeah, I think that stuff is extraneous crap that hurts more than it helps.

    2. Re:i'm installing right now... by phrasebook · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We'll see how not running Nortn anything works for you when Outlook auto-installs the next mass-email worm.

      I don't use Outlook, but it's well known that that isn't the default behaviour anymore anyway. I use PINE on a separate system.

      Got Windows? Connect to any other system, ever, including using removable media? You need antivirus software.

      No you don't. I connect to all kinds of machines and have never had a virus, ever. Although I hardly ever share removeable media. How do you think I'm meant to get one? Connecting to machines doesn't mean getting infected. The only way I can think of is by running a suspicious .exe or a macro in a Word document or whatever. Never done anything like that myself.

      It amazes me that people think they're somehow an isolated little island. "Oh, nobody will infect me, I'm too small."

      Nobody will infect me because they can't directly connect to me and I have enough experience and common sense to avoid getting into trouble. I don't see why that sounds too good to be true - I find it quite easy. What amazes me is the amount of crap people install on their Windows machines in the name of protection...

    3. Re:i'm installing right now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I connect to all kinds of machines and have never had a virus, ever

      How can you know that if you don't use any protection?

    4. Re:i'm installing right now... by phrasebook · · Score: 1

      How can you know that if you don't use any protection?

      Common sense.

      How can you know what common sense is if you don't have any?

    5. Re:i'm installing right now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does common sense tell you that you didn't get a virus/worm/trojan?

    6. Re:i'm installing right now... by AusG4 · · Score: 1

      I should preface this by saying that the parent of this thread does indeed smack of a Linux cheerleader baiting flame most aggressively.

      And now for something completely different:

      As arrogant sounding as you come off, I would have to agree...

      When I was an unenlightened chimp and was still using Windows (i abandoned ship before Windows 98 dropped, used Solaris almost exclusively for quite a while, then finally ended up with OS X), I could count on one hand how many viruses I had contracted in a lifetime of being a hard-core nerd, dating back to even before my first copy of Windows... A boxed copy of 2.0 I won at a school computer fair.

      Likewise, at work, our tech department is pretty much virus free, whereas the sales and marketing people are a violent pit of bad code and worms running amuck.

      That said, the sales/marketing people all have Norton Anti-Virus (which we sadly pay volume licensing for), whereas most of the coders have nothing. Every so often, someone scans the backup cans and finds the sales/marketing people have folder upon folder full of the virulent flavor of the week, whereas the engineers folders are clean. ONCE, our web master had a Word document with a macro virus in it, though the document in questioned had been sent to him from marketing.

      Given that most of the coders are connected to the internet 12-16 hours a day (compared to the sales/marketing people, who might do 8), I can honestly say that there is a lot of validity to the suggestion that experience and competence are the best firewall one can have.

      Those lacking should stick with SonicWalls, unless you don't need hardware accelerated VPN support and don't want to spend $700.

      At that point, a $50 Linksys is your best bet.

      --
      bash-3.00$ uname -a
      SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
    7. Re:i'm installing right now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) it is connected to the net using NAT, not directly to the modem and

      This will protect you provided that the NAT is setup correctly

      b) I slipstreamed SP1 into my XP CD, so that when I install it I'm already at SP1 level

      This will help very little, since the most widespread worms all target vulnerabilities discovered after SP1 (dcom, lsass)

  63. Firewall by $exyNerdie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Like others have mentioned, use a Router (eg. from Linksys, DLink, Netgear) as firewall or get FREE Zonealarm firewall or just turn WinXP's firewall on. You need a firewall or use another box (e.g Linux) as proxy to connect to web.

  64. Found at isc.incidents.org: by BandwidthHog · · Score: 5, Informative
    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  65. but if you can't.... by Mydron · · Score: 5, Informative
    There are a few guides out there explaining what to do. Most of them involve shutting off windows services (such as file sharing and the windows network client) and using the firewall included with Windows XP before connecting to the internet.

    Here is a fairly comprehensive guide, aptly named: Windows XP: Surviving the First Day

    1. Re:but if you can't.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Windows XP: Surviving the First Day"

      How ironic! Wern't Windows 2000 and Windows XP supposed to be the most secure Microsoft OS's ever?

      And I remember a certain Microsoft CEO of a previous era saying something like, "Windows NT is going to be so easy to use, all point 'n click, that you will be able to hire sysadmins off the street."!

      And I still use Windows 98. At least it is far easier to reinstall. OK, OK, I grant that it may need to be reinstalled a little more often.

      As I like to say, "Funny like a rubber crutch!".

      But, I guess that this is just "Microsoft progress", which is becomming just as big a joke as "Microsoft innovation".

    2. Re:but if you can't.... by dknj · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is a pretty poor Ask Slashdot article, IMHO. Here is how I do it within an hour and have nothing to worry about:

      1. Unplug network cable
      2. Install Windows XP
      3. Upon first boot turn on the Windows Firewall and reconnect network cable
      4. http://www.windowsupdate.com
      5. Wait for patches to download, then remove network cable and reboot after patches have installed
      6. Return to http://www.windowsupdate.com and download the remaining patches
      7. Reboot (no need to unplug network cable this time) and install a Virus Scanner/Firewall Suite.

      This takes an hour and isn't rocket science.

      -dk

    3. Re:but if you can't.... by innosent · · Score: 3, Informative

      Problem is, the Windows Firewall is almost completely useless, and the average computer is probably hit by an attack every 20 minutes, which is far less time than it takes to download all of the patches, especially since the first reboot will only cover SP1, which only eliminates about 5% of the active exploits. The original (I'm told the SP2 version is better) windows firewall does not protect people from any of the attack vectors I've seen coming through my network so far this year. It is a "stateful firewall", it's just that the only state it maintains is an open one. It does not protect the computer from access to system services (most notably RPC), so it cannot protect people for long enough to patch their systems. There are only two methods for a clean install, either install and patch offline from CDs, or install from behind a stateful firewall (either a cheap linksys/dlink/netgear type or your network firewall). All installations we do at work are done initially on the private segment of the network, with packets sent through a NATd portion of the firewall (which by the nature of NAT accomplishes exactly what is needed). Of course, we also drop packets which have no legitimate purpose on our network, and log the supposed legitimate ones, which is probably a bit beyond the requirements for installing XP on granny's computer.

      --
      --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
    4. Re:but if you can't.... by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      I agree. Using the windows firewall will give at least some protection.

      all firewalls are turned off.

      You say you installed NIS. Keep it's firewall on. I prefer Sygate, but what I do is block everything except Internet Explorer. You can block explorer.exe and most of the other windows componenets that try to connect. Definatley block ANYTHING that says it's an incomming connection.

      I've used this method to get around campus network checks for patches before you're given a DHCP lease. As far as the network knows until after I get the patches and relax the firewall, I'm not even running windows.

    5. Re:but if you can't.... by dknj · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except the firewall will block incoming connections. Don't go to other sites which will exploit old IE bugs and install spyware/viruses/etc, go straight to windows update after installing windows. That will patch up to SP1.. there is a known bug with the firewall that will leave the machine vulnerable for a few seconds (enough to get infected) during the boot before SP1 finishes (or it may be another patch that fixes it.. i don't remember), this is why you remove the network cable before you boot the second time. After you patch it completely, you can install your firewall suite and virus scanners (as i stated).

      I used to do this on a daily basis, before I switched to a fully automated ris build, and never had an infected machine.

      -dk

    6. Re:but if you can't.... by Glamdrlng · · Score: 2, Informative

      The ICF is no less useful than a linksys box running NAT. I frequently run portscans on machines running ICF, and the only ports that ever come up are the ones I've opened.

      --

      Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
    7. Re:but if you can't.... by innosent · · Score: 2, Informative

      The ones you've opened, like 135,137-139, and 445? You don't open ports in XP, you close them, the OS starts with all services enabled, all relative ports open. The ICF doesn't do anything about these ports, unless explicitly instructed to, and these are the ones that matter. NAT, or more accurately PAT (Port Address Translation), maintains the source and destination ports, just as a stateful firewall will, and makes the machine inaccessible to non-solicited ip/port combinations. This way, only the requests and responses to/from windows update/symantec/whoever are allowed to pass through, which is exactly how all home machines should always be, and exactly what is needed for a clean install. In addition, there have been vulnerabilities in the ICF itself, which will remain open until SP1 is installed. Host-based security is a nice addition to network security, but I would be very nervous having the machines I administer connected the internet with nothing more than ICF and an AV package, even though all of them are up to date on patches. There are more vulnerabilities out there, patches from Microsoft are far from pre-emptive, and signature-based (AV) software is reactive, often missing signatures until it is too late (someone had to get infected to get the signature).

      --
      --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
    8. Re:but if you can't.... by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Twenty minutes ? I'm on a consumer DSL network in California and I'm seeing activity on ZoneAlarm every 3-5 seconds. It's all merely "Medium" severity, except for a HiPri packet for port 1028 coming from a machine in what appears to be China - DNS fails on the tracert after ahost names 'chinatelecom' on Cogent's network. The rest seem to be from all over: France, Poland, Verizon's network, Germany etc.

      It's terrifying, really. Next time I have to install Windows, I'm not even going to have a router in the house.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    9. Re:but if you can't.... by YardgnomeUT · · Score: 1

      I agree. This guy is not truly asking how to install windows without getting infected. He is making a point that if you don't have a firewall running, it is difficult to install Windows without becoming infected. He knows damn well that the service packs and patches will download and install just fine even with the firewall running.

      --
      Negative, I am a meat popsicle.
    10. Re:but if you can't.... by Darkangael · · Score: 0

      How is it a poor ask slashdot article? The submitter had a question which I would say the majority of computer users do not know the answer to (due to the number of people who are always so surprised when I tell them that they have a worm already only 10 minutes after install). The submitter asked said question. This is exactly what "Ask Slashdot" is for.

      Having said that, what you suggested does look like a pretty good answer, although I also have my doubts about the XP firewall (It's pretty good at stopping people from using their own computers though, so it might be good for stopping worms. Never tried it personally as I have always been hiding behind NAT).

    11. Re:but if you can't.... by mindmaster064 · · Score: 1

      This is why you buy a real firewall like sonicwall (relatively cheap). It's a one time expenditure that lasts virtually forever and insures that you are completely invulnerable to 99% of everything out there. Maybe you people like reloading machines all fucking day, but $400 one time (maybe less if you shop around) and you get a firewall adequate for 10 users with vpn, load balancing, transparent proxy, client virus scanner support (it makes sure all connected clients are up to date) and all kinds of other cool things. I've had mine since 2000 and I have never had need or reason to upgrade. The newer boxes are almost the same thing with a slightly slimmer form factor. This box does more crap than nearly every other firewall besides Checkpoint and is the best value. No software upgrades (sonicwall supports them for life) and a very agreeable licensing package. - Mind

    12. Re:but if you can't.... by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      The original (I'm told the SP2 version is better) windows firewall does not protect people from any of the attack vectors I've seen coming through my network so far this year.
      how this guy got modded +5 informative I'll never understand. the whole post relies on this highlighted statement, which is entirely false. I'm don't particularly like MS but spreading anti-MS FUD is not better than MS spreading anti-linux FUD. if you enable the builtin firewall, you are at least as safe as though you were behind a NAT box, which is at least safe enough to patch your machine even on 56k.

      --
      TIAEAE!
    13. Re:but if you can't.... by cowbutt · · Score: 1
      Parent is entirely correct; even though Windows Is Not My Favourite OS, the only obviously-exploitable deficiency of Windows XP's built-in (personal) firewall is the window of time during boot when the network is up, but the firewall isn't. SP2 fixes this, I gather, in addition to adding state tracking and a sane default policy.

      Incoming connections to the NetBIOS and RPC ports can be blocked, but IIRC, you need to define them yourself in the firewall GUI so that they can be.

      --

    14. Re:but if you can't.... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 3

      How ironic! Wern't Windows 2000 and Windows XP supposed to be the most secure Microsoft OS's ever?

      Right. They were.

      And I remember a certain Microsoft CEO of a previous era saying something like, "Windows NT is going to be so easy to use, all point 'n click, that you will be able to hire sysadmins off the street."!

      Right, and it happened.

      I guess I'm not quite understanding your point.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    15. Re:but if you can't.... by Glamdrlng · · Score: 1
      The ones you've opened, like 135,137-139, and 445?
      When you enable the ICF, it starts off with all ports closed. So no, they would be the ports that I deliberately opened. In this case, TCP 22.
      ...all relative ports open. The ICF doesn't do anything about these ports, unless explicitly instructed to, and these are the ones that matter.
      I guess by "explicitly instructed" you mean "enabled" or "turned on".
      NAT, or more accurately PAT (Port Address Translation), maintains the source and destination ports, just as a stateful firewall will, and makes the machine inaccessible to non-solicited ip/port combinations.
      Thanks, but I'm pretty sure everyone who cares abou this conversation knows how NAT works.
      In addition, there have been vulnerabilities in the ICF itself
      I'd like to hear about them. I don't remember hearing about any such vulnerabilities, but if they're fairly old I probably would have forgotten about them already. At any rate, I'll agree with you here, neither a perimeter firewall nor a host-based firewall provides sufficient security on its own. My point is that, if you're that concerend about security for your home network, the POS linksys box isn't giving you much more functionality (NAT, stateful filtering, etc) than the Windows ICF.
      --

      Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
    16. Re:but if you can't.... by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      What crappy DSL network on you on where you get hit with this stuff?

      I'm glad I'm on Speakeasy, and they filter that sort of crap out for me. Also, if someone's infected on their network, they're disconnected almost immediately. It's a Good Thing(tm).

      When I had Cox@Home, powering up the modem (without anything being plugged into the ethernet port) would result in the activity light flashing non-stop. Wonderful stuff.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    17. Re:but if you can't.... by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Earthlink. I need to switch back to Speakeasy now that I can get something faster and cheaper than an ISDN line.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    18. Re:but if you can't.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Light some candles and swing a dead chicken over your head three times before starting the install. I do this every time and have never had an infected machine.

    19. Re:but if you can't.... by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Like someone posted above, why not just get a Linksys 8 port switch/firewall for ~$50?

      I'll agree that your approach is perhaps more comprehensive, but quite possible overkill for most folks.

      What does the Sonicwall box do that a Linksys box is lacking?

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    20. Re:but if you can't.... by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      Wow, i thoguth i was the only one still using windows 98, i use windows 98SE and haven't had to re-install in ove... *fizzle*

    21. Re:but if you can't.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This won't protect you from uPNP exploits, and there had been more thank one worm for that. You have to manually turn off the uPNP service.

    22. Re:but if you can't.... by mindmaster064 · · Score: 1

      Probably logging, alerts, vpn, and better nat / port forwarding, Transparent proxying, and snmp. It is nice to know when you are being hacked. :) What are you, "most users" or a slashdot geek? :)
      - Mind

    23. Re:but if you can't.... by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      "What are you, "most users" or a slashdot geek? :)"

      With a young wife and two (really) young kids, I'd have to say that in my head, I'm a 'slashdot geek', but in my wallet (opens wallet and moths flutter out) I haven't the budget of even 'most people'. *grin*

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. SP Network Install by earthdark · · Score: 1

    Step 7a) With the builtin firewall on, download the network install of WinXP SP1.

    Sure it's a big download but once it's downloaded, disconnect your cable and apply the service pack. Once everything is set and secured, reconnect the cable and check Windows Update for additional patches.

    If you're still getting bitten even doing this, spend the $40 and buy a cheapo Linksys 4 port router. You can even use it as switch after.

  68. When it asks if you agree to the onerous EULA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just click on "NO" and install Linux instead.

  69. what the hell? by Bad+Ad · · Score: 1

    seriously, i never post here really, but this deserves a reply.... you should know how these machines are getting infected.... infected machines are scanning ip ranges and infecting vulnerable machines that have the required ports open (135 is one i know off hand) all you need to do is install windows xp with network connection unplugged, then enable the built in firewall on your network connection after installation... connect to windows update and download away. then, if you wish, can disable the firewall. tho i do recommend a hardware based solution.

  70. Not smart for a Linux user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not that smart, are you? I refuse to believe you have been using Linux since 1995. Why don't to do some research which patches would fix the worms first, download them from Microsoft using your (duh) Linux machine, burn them on a CD, then install them on the Windows PCs before you hook them up to the Net.

    These days, using Linux means shit anymore.

    1. Re:Not smart for a Linux user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...continued:

      Why do I think you're bluffing? Because back in 1995 (around the same time I started using Linux), people required more tedious and unconventional things to get Linux up and running. On most cases, you'd have to download libraries manually, configure the kernel and figure out why the dependencies don't work, etc. Now you tell me you can't patch Windows XP without going online? Where'd your Linux 1995 logic go?

  71. make sure you block all incoming ports by steve.m · · Score: 3, Informative

    sasser exploits a vulnerability in lsass.exe, which listens on 445. Some software firewalls leave this open, as it is required for Active Directory logins under some circumstances. If you do that and then go straight to windows update you should be fine.

  72. First rule of connecting to the internet by FS1 · · Score: 1

    Steps to protect yourself on the internet
    1. Firewall on at all times
    2. Up to date antivirus software
    3. Never turn 1 + 2 off for any reason unless you determine through failure it is absolutely nesscessary and never remain connected to the internet during this time.
    4. Never install, run or click on anything that looks suspicious or offers to enlarge any part of your anatomy.

    On a side note, Windows XP requires an insane amount of tweaking till you get a stable, virus-free, annoyance-free operating enviroment. Also it requires that you develop smart computing habits. I have no idea how most people survive on windows computers without firewalls, up-to-date virus software, and no windows update patches.

    --
    A Fatal OE Exception has occurred, Sig will now reboot.
  73. Ladies and Gentelmen by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1

    And the BSOD award for the only person in the world able to fuck up a simple Windows install goes to... (Just kidding!)

    Can't you download the updates you need on another machine, and move them over? Failing that, use a knoppix CD or something and download them into a folder until you can boot up XP?

  74. Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pop a Slackware CD-ROM in the tray instead of that gawd-awful Windoze shit. Trust me on this - you don't really need Windoze. I've been Windoze-free at home and on all the computers in my business since October 4, 2000. I got the shits of all the Windoze crashes and viruses and worms and vulnerabilities and just said "enough." I ain't no rocket scientist or IT guru, if I could do it anyone can. For once in your life, take a stand and tell Bill Gates & Co. to stick their buggy, vulnerable, high=priced OS up their asses.

  75. Check your power supply and heat by wildman6801 · · Score: 1

    If your computer has nortan antivirus installed on before you update your computer, nortan will detect if something another application is acting like a virus. Since you are losing power to the machine, I would assume to check to see if your computer is overheating or if your have a faulty power supply. You may not have a virus after all!

    --
    A site cowboyneal will like http://www.freewebs.com/atpa/
  76. I work for an ISP by mAineAc · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have people do this all the time without any problems. I have the WinXP firewall enabled then connect and go to windows update. No one has an issue doing it this way.

  77. I never have trouble like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Admittedly, the last time I had to reinstall XP was at least 6 mo. ago, so maybe some new ass-kicking virus is out, but I never have trouble like this.

    Are you sure your hardware is good? Update your bios. And whenever I start having mystery problems with a machine I start eyeing it's power supply. Maybe check your RAM as well.

  78. If it doesn't work they way they tell you... by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

    I know many have already said this but, dude, it already isn't working, it can't not work any more, so leave the firewall on. It can't hurt to try.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  79. overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evidently Norton Internet Security did not live up to its promise...

    If you read the blurb, he turned off all firewalls as per instructions from MS. Thanks for playing.

    1. Re:overrated by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. tehdely is absolutely correct, 1 router + 1 built in XP firewall is all you need to prevent your connection from getting wasted.

      If you need a router, call up Verizon or someone and they'll give you a router for free. If you can't get a free router from your ISP, you're doing it wrong.

      --
      [o]_O
    2. Re:overrated by ahaning · · Score: 1

      If you need a router, call up Verizon or someone and they'll give you a router for free. If you can't get a free router from your ISP, you're doing it wrong.

      Intriguing. So, I can call just about anyone and get a free hardware firewall?

      This is an amazing revelation. Do you think they'll send me anything else, like a new PC? Because this one is getting rather old and I'm sure the software is horribly vulnerable to hackers.

      Seriously, though, where is it that some ISP will just send you a free router? There's a commercial on here where they advertise Yahoo!SBC DSL and there's a mention of home networking for $50. I'm betting this is about half for the hardware and half for the labor. Where do I get free hardware firewalls? A URL would be preferable.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    3. Re:overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god youre an argumentative cocksucker aren't you

    4. Re:overrated by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      "If you read the blurb, he turned off all firewalls as per instructions from MS. Thanks for playing."

      I'm interested to know who at microsoft gave him those instructions. They're not on the windows update website, or at least I can't find anything saying that. There is no reason to disable any firewalls, hardware or software, before installing the required patches.

      Anyway, what I do is keep all the pre-SP2 critical patches on a USB key drive, and install them all before connecting the network cable. My XP CD has SP1 slipstreamed, and the patches all fit in a 22MB zip file.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    5. Re:overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you hitting on him? sounds like you might be testing the waters to see if it is ok to buy him a drink.

    6. Re:overrated by ahaning · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm not choosy as to who can buy me a drink, so if your parent poster does want to, that's cool. Just be aware that I drink nothing but beer (no wine, vodka, rum, etc.), and only good stuff. If it has "Lite" in its name, it's not going in my tummy. If it's dark, has a nice foamy head, and a strong taste, hand it over.

      However, as to what you're suggesting, my door don't swing that way (unless your parent is a chick, in which case, it does, with limitations :-/ ).

      But, Hah!, I never expected to get a response like that. I suppose I should feel honored that someone was ticked off enough by my post to take the time to insult me. So, thank you, grandparent poster, your insult is accepted. From now on, I will alert all new friends and acquaintances to watch out! because I am an argumentative cocksucker (figuratively).

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    7. Re:overrated by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      Um, I specifically mentioned Verizon because that's where I got my Linksys router & Linksys WiFi PCI card, for free.

      --
      [o]_O
    8. Re:overrated by ahaning · · Score: 1

      Who is your ISP?

      Verizon?

      Do you not think that they built the price of the router and card into the service? Or did you just order DSL/cable with free installation and the usual $40-50/month fee? If the latter, it would be nice to have some information about this deal from their website.

      You also suggested that almost anyone (okay, I realize you didn't mean anyone) would have a deal like this. Any URL proof of that?

      I'm just calling you on your overly general statement. You must in future realize that situations are not the same everywhere. Not everyone has the option of even broadband and not everyone feels comfortable with the offerings of your ISP of choice.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    9. Re:overrated by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      $30 a month, from January to May, then I moved into a place that already had a cable connection. Got to keep the DSL modem (want to buy a used DSL modem?), the router, and the card.

      No I'm not posting my credit card bills, but thanks for making my day, I didn't realize I had gotten such a sweet deal!

      --
      [o]_O
  80. Be prepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download the service pack on some other computer, burn it to a cd, apply it to your XP setup before connecting to the Internet.

    Good luck!

  81. Firewall on CD, network cable disconnected by New+Folder · · Score: 1

    I had to deal with this a while ago. I reinstalled WindowsXP during a massive worm epidemic.

    Luckily for me, I had a free installer for ZoneAlarm (a firewall) backed up on a CD. So... I just kept the network cable disconnected, and installed WindowsXP. After finishing the install, I installed ZoneAlarm from the CD. THEN, I connected the network cable and connected to Windows Update. I had no problems.

  82. updating.. by sinner0423 · · Score: 1

    I like the NAT/firewall idea. But since he states he's on cable already, I would much rather get some of the downloadable security patches straight from microsoft's website.

    Automation isn't all it's cracked up to be. And this is exactly the reason. Why bother hosting / distributing a patch to something if it *WILL NOT WORK* when you install it? To apply them manually, then install it, of course! Microsoft Update Rollup

    Something like this should be easily digested. Hope this helps. You may need something different, but check around on microsoft's website for that, if you can eudure it. oh, the pain! the pain!

  83. Windows XP: Surviving the first day by UnderAttack · · Score: 1

    A paper with step by step instructions on how to update a virgin Windows XP system can be found here: SANS Reading Room: Windows XP, surviving the first day (PDF)

    --
    ---- join dshield.org Distributed Intrusion Detec
    1. Re:Windows XP: Surviving the First Day by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Excellent article. And this is the number one article on the sans.org reading list. ... Couldn't help noticing number three with its provocative title: Penetration 101.

      --
      Have you Meta Moderated t
    2. Re:Windows XP: Surviving the First Day by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Couldn't help noticing number three with its provocative title: Penetration 101.

      Ooh baby.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    3. Re:Windows XP: Surviving the First Day by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Are any of these articles available as HTML? PDF is not, I repeat, IS NOT a suitable document exchange format. It's a print format. So unless you expect your audience to print out the document, please use HTML.

      * note, I realize the parent has no control over this, I'm just venting in the hopes that the word might spread.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
  84. Here's your problem(s) by ellem · · Score: 2, Informative

    1 - Hardware Firewall Only. Software firewalls are for pikers and people waiting to be hacked.

    2 - Download SP1 to a CD.

    3 - STOP USING NORTON for ANYTHING OTHER THAN ANTIVIRUS

    4 - Read 3 again

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:Here's your problem(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As another poster pointed out, all firewalls are software firewalls and thus your distinction is meaningless. I think what you mean by hardware firewall is a firewall on another machine, perhaps a machine designed specifically to be a firewall (some routers have this ability).

      In actuality, if you have the technical know-how, running a firewall on another computer, ie, not a linksys router or the like, is the best way to handle this. Because most of those little routers do have bugs in their firmware that get exposed from time to time, and you generally can't update them particularly easily. Linksys runs Linux, I think, in which vulnerabilities are periodically discovered.

      Your best bet is to get an old machine, non-x86 if possible -- old SPARCs are great for this, and cheap on eBay -- and install OpenBSD or Linux and configure it as a firewall. I would recommend OpenBSD because (imho) its pf firewall is easier to configure than iptables, and OpenBSD is a fairly specialized distribution that focuses primarily on security. On the downside, security updates are often in source-code form, which means that on a slow machine (like an old SPARC) updates can be painful to install. Linux doesn't usually suffer from this problem, and Debian *STABLE* makes a great firewall.

    2. Re:Here's your problem(s) by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't even use Norton for that! AVG man! Never did me wrong! Tag on a cheap NAT appliance, all set! More exclamation marks!

      --
      Do you see what I did there?
    3. Re:Here's your problem(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norton Windoctor is great program. Fixes some problems that I otherwise wouldn't be able to fix or don't want to waste the time fixing.

  85. Dosent sound like norton is working.... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If you are still getting a worm after you install nortons firewall, then it sounds like its not working.. ( you wouldn't be getting a virus, yet )

    Id go ahead and turn on M$'s firewall initially as well before you even plug it into the modem, just to get past the updates.. which you should have on CDROM anyway and not need to connect to RR until they are complete.....

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Dosent sound like norton is working.... by wildman6801 · · Score: 1

      The story says nortan's firewall is turned off! So this is not nortans fault. If you turn off the firewall then beware of the consequences!

      --
      A site cowboyneal will like http://www.freewebs.com/atpa/
  86. Well, try the following by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

    First, you know how some programs tell you "CLOSE ALL OPEN PROGRAMS BEFORE INSTALLING" just in CASE it needs to overwrite something, 99.99% of the time whaty ou have open, it doesn't need to overwrite.

    Same thing with microsoft telling you to turn off your firewall, they don't want 10,000 extra people calling them saying, "WTF?!?" because of some random firewall problems with windows update, leave it on.

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  87. Are you sure it was virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There are many reasons why your machine could have been rebooting, and a virus is only one of those reasons (and most viruses would not cause your machine to reboot anyways)

    I would definitely follow the advice of everyone else -- ditch the Norton crap and concentrate on getting your Windows setup first -- leaving Windows firewall on, and get all the patches/updates... THEN install your norton software. If you have an extra $30-50 definitely get a cheap Linksys or D-Link router (especially if you have a DSL connection, because the router will make sure your connection never gets cut off by the provider (*cough* Ameritech/SBC *cough*)...

  88. Get A Cheap Hardware Firewall by jjohnson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Buy a LinkSys cable/dsl router for $50, which includes a firewall (if you can't afford a Cisco Pix). I've never had anything get through to any Windows box I was installing up to the point I got it completely updated.

    No one should have any Windows box directly on a cable/dsl line anyway.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  89. If you're a Linux user, you can slipstream... by SilentChris · · Score: 1

    Since you're a Linux user, you probably have a good grasp of most computing concepts. I'm a little surprised that you don't know about slipstreaming. Google it. Simply put, slipstreaming will add all of the current service packs/patches into the main install, so you're essentially installing XP up to date.

    You can do this on an old Windows machine, within WINE, just about anything that'll run an XP executable. At work, we create a new install CD every month (when the latest patches come out). Think of it as compiling from a CSV without the source (getting the very latest install).

  90. Don't be a dumbass.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a god damned firewall..oh wait, you say you're a 9 year user of Linux - set it up as a firewall to block all the incoming crap...You're stupid if you can't protect yourself.

  91. windows so bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I dont really understand all the talk of windows being oh so incredibly bad. Norton has detected up about a total of 5 virus's getting anywhere near my PC, all in email attatchments I'd never have opened anyway.

    All I do is not be a total idiot when it comes to opening email or clicking links in IRC, run Zonealarm firewall (free and piss-easy to use), head to windowsupdate occasionally and OK, OK, disable a few services that were blatantly unnecessary.

    I've never had an infection in about 7/8 years of using windows. TBH, if Linux was the monopolising OS things wouldnt be so much better, there'd be the same ignorant users on an OS even harder to use, and the same people writing viruses for it.

    1. Re:windows so bad? by cpuenvy · · Score: 1

      First, Norton will not pick up ANY virus that it can't see. And since most of the bad bugs are network aware, they will kick your ass and Nortons will not see shit. His problems are with getting the updates in the first place. No updates, and none of the AntiVirus products out there will see things like Nachi.

      As for your comment about "If Linux was the monopolising OS...", that is bullshit. Mac users are on BSD, are they getting hammered?

      Dumbass.

      --
      DISCLAIMER:

      I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  92. February? by wcbarksdale · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows Security Update CD: February 2004

    Updated Date: April 16, 2004

    This CD includes Microsoft critical updates released through October 2003

    Well, as long as that's clear.
    1. Re:February? by Prod_Deity · · Score: 1

      That's what mine says. I thought all were the same. My bad.

    2. Re:February? by CrudPuppy · · Score: 1, Informative

      why anyone would put a Windows machine directly on a cable modem in the first place is beyond me. who in th geek crowd doesnt have a POS computer sitting around to load openbsd and configure as a firewall/NAT??

      now, for the tech-challenged community, I think the responsibility should fall on MS and cable companies. MS should definitely be allowing pirated copies to update, and cable companies should encourge customers to NEVER hook a windows box directly to a cable modem.

      --
      A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.
    3. Re:February? by pogle · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work part time for a cableco, and while it is our official policy that we do not support, endorse, or have anything to do with routers, I still recommend them. I explain that the cableco cannot support them, etc, first. Then I explain the benefits of getting one; few people bother unless they have multiple computers, but I feel better whenever I convince someone that its a worthwhile investment.

      People get irritated at the cost of cable modem service, at the cost of the cable modem itself (whether buying or renting). Telling them to go spend even more money afterwards doesn't go over well. Cable modem manufacturers should start following linksys and making 'all in one' units, with DOCSIS compliant cable modems and a cable/dsl router built as one box; the configuration was a bit weird, but it seemed infinitely more secure by default.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    4. Re:February? by Delphis · · Score: 1

      Isn't it sad though that the majority of software that comes with DSL/cable installs is for Windows?

      Take SBC for instance, who I have for DSL (good service throughout the past year, so I'm happy in that regard) they require a windows machine to set a username and password for your account as well as set up some crappy dialer thing that also 'takes over' internet explorer too.

      Oh, when I mentioned to them that I use Linux, they were 'huh? What version of Windows is that?'. Dumbass DSL customer service people.

      Anyway, the install... The way to do it (and the way I signed back up with SBC since moving back to an area that can get it) was to use a spare harddrive and fresh windows install (I already had the machine's drivers and latest service pack downloaded) in the windows machine to install the software on, set up the account and hand it to pppoe-config on the Debian Linux machine that actually runs my network.

      A work-around for a Linux user, but certainly doesn't allow you to bypass Windows entirely. Until ISPs notice that people want to set up on Linux machines, then the situation won't change. For many in the 'tech-challenged community' all they have is a Windows box.

      --
      Delphis
    5. Re:February? by mwood · · Score: 1

      I'm attempting to cure SBC of good-OS-phobia by always sending detailed log extracts with my tech support requests. It couldn't hurt to give the techies more information than the typical MS "something broke somewhere, na-na na-na-na na!" nonmessage. Maybe someday one of them will convince his supervisor that "these Linux and *BSD guys are supporting *us* -- we should support *them* better."

      Oh, it probably won't happen, but it least it won't fail to happen because I failed to try.

    6. Re:February? by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1

      Cable companies will never discourage anyone from hooking anything up to a cable modem as long as they can charge for it. You think MS should be allowing pirated copies to update? OK. If I steal your car, can I bring it back to you to have the oil changed when I need it?

    7. Re:February? by cl0secall · · Score: 1

      A better analogy would be to ask "If I steal a car from a dealership, can I bring it back to get parts?"

      The answer is yes, though you may get caught for doing it.

      --
      Model 551, Chambered in 6mm
    8. Re:February? by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      but the car isn't a hazard to the rest of us just because it is a car, if you applied the analogy to include free recalls for stolen vehicles (like the old pinto that exploded in a rear collision) then the analoy would be more apt.

  93. disconnect the machine from the network ... by nonane · · Score: 1

    ... then install windows.

    2) start->control panel->network connections . right click properties on the adpater used for the internet connection.

    3) Go to the Advanced tab and turn on the firewall.

    4) Reconnect the machine to the network and start downloading the patches.

  94. Install updates *before* putting it on the net by drfreak · · Score: 1

    Put the service pack and all critical updated an a CD or DVD, then install them all before putting it on the net.

    I see people saying to use a hardware firewall instead of software but they are just as vulnerable, especially with the recent news of them having wide open web interfaces. If a software-based windows firewall isn't doing the trick, set your old 486 up with OpenBSD.

  95. Seriously by essdodson · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Are you really asking this? Surely you can figure this out on your own. Where do worms and viruses come from? That's right, network connection.

    • Disconnect
    • install
    • ask RMS "Can I help you?"
    • enable firewall
    • ask RMS "Can I help you?"
    • connect
    • While congratulating RMS on his office in the Bill Gates building slip an RFID tag in his coat pocket.
    • apply patches, get a cup of coffee there are 19 or so, reboot
    • apply a few more patches.


    • Congratulations, even Linux users can figure out Windows now.
    --
    scott
  96. RTFQ by Adam9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Launch the Norton update facility (per Norton's recommendation, the built-in XP firewall is turned off);

    ...

    Start to pull down Service Pack One; per Microsoft's instructions, all firewalls are turned off.


    reallocate was just following the instructions that Microsoft and Symantec gave him/her.

    1. Re:RTFQ by RupW · · Score: 1

      reallocate was just following the instructions that Microsoft and Symantec gave him/her.

      Huh? daveschroeder said

      Do the installation behind a personal NAT/firewall device.

      i.e. behind a NAT or a firewall on a separate box, i.e. not relying on a software firewall on the box you're installing. Then the Windows box can connect to the outside world through the NAT/firewall but the outside world cannot connect back to it.

    2. Re:RTFQ by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      reallocate was just following the instructions that Microsoft and Symantec gave him/her.

      If ANY piece of software ever lists "disable all firewalls" as a part of the instructions, toss it and run away. There's no reason to ever disable a hardware firewall on a properly written piece of software. As for software firewalls, well those are trash so I won't even bother.

    3. Re:RTFQ by SirCrashALot · · Score: 5, Insightful
      As for software firewalls, well those are trash so I won't even bother.

      That depends entirely on what software you are talking about. All a hardware fireall is, is a firewall from a company that realized people won't pay $$ for a piece of software. I.e its a software firewall, just running on some different hardware.

    4. Re:RTFQ by photon317 · · Score: 4, Interesting


      There's really no such thing as a hardware firewall. All hardware firewalls are in fact software firewalls running on a peice of hardware, just like all software firewalls do. Perhaps a better re-statement of your point is to say that you should use a seperate non-windows-based firewall rather than one which is installed locally on the windows machine. Personally I use a Sparc/Linux box for this, but you can have good results just using a netgear nat box or something. NAT is the ultimate home firewall anyways, just dont start routing inbound ports through it to your PC and you're gtg.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    5. Re:RTFQ by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      That's not necessiarly so. The Cisco blade firewalls are hardware, at least in part. They have ASICs to speed up their operations, which is what makes them so slick. We tried two pix 535s on our network and our traffic just killed them. Too many connections to keep track of. Two blades now handle the same thing with ease. Well the 535 is just code running on a P3, the blade has actual hardware to help it out.

      However you are correct that most firewalls are nothing more than a specialised set of code running on a dedicated box.

    6. Re:RTFQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure sure, mod me troll, but give an insightful to the guy who claims "hardware firewalls = teh grate, software firewalls = teh siht" with no facts to back up such a ridiculous assertion, and no comprehension of the fact that any hardware firewall has software running on it.

      The mod-crack must be extra potent today.

    7. Re:RTFQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, new around here?

      This is par for the course. Now please report to the indoctrination center and stop being such a troublemaker.

    8. Re:RTFQ by BasharTeg · · Score: 1

      One might argue that the difference is that a hardware software can be implemented in hardware as a finite state machine as opposed to a piece of software which could be impacted by the environment it runs under.

      I'm not saying software firewalls are crap, but there is an argument for properly implemented hardware firewalls.

    9. Re:RTFQ by fataugie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That depends entirely on what software you are talking about. All a hardware fireall is, is a firewall from a company that realized people won't pay $$ for a piece of software.

      You're fucking kidding, right?

      So, what you're saying is, a majority of Fortune 500 companies can throw their Cisco PiX firewalls away and just install ZoneAlarm? Think of the money they'll save!

      So that's what the second step to profit is...

      --

      WTF? Over?

    10. Re:RTFQ by SirCrashALot · · Score: 1

      Not at all, what is Pix? Software. It's not the medium of the firewall its the quality of the software. I'm sure my OpenBSD box outperforms many off the shelf "hardware" firewalls. Cisco boxes are expensive not only because of their hardware, but because of their software.

    11. Re:RTFQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your kind words.

      I have been to the indoctrination center, and found it extremely enlightening. Did you know that Mozilla is the only browser that's any good at any task? Until my education, I actually used to enjoy the small size and impressive speed of the evil closed source Opera browser! The center opened my eyes to my blindness, without once ever resorting to factual information!

      They even gave me a free crack sample to go with my first mod points. Two thumbs up!

    12. Re:RTFQ by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Not a Pix..hell now. Those are awsome for large networks. But the consumer based firewalls such as Linksys and Netgear products run software in RAM on the routers themselves. Sometimes they lock up because of corruption or something. So, you have to power them off and on to get them running again. Not a problem. Just needs to be understood. That's all.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    13. Re:RTFQ by jhoger · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are reasons for choosing a dedicated firewall over a add-on software to a general purpose computer.

      Having worked for a firewall company, you are correct, there is no inherent difference between the software in a firewall that runs on your computer and one that runs on separate hardware... a so called "hardware firewall" (the correct term I would use is "dedicated firewall")

      Hardware firewall are just dedicated computers. They don't generally implement hardware state machines, or whatever. They are typically an embedded OS and TCP/IP stack with stateful packet inspection, NAT, application level gateways, etc. No sane person would try to implement that in silicon, and certainly not silicon that can be kept up-to-date. It's software, plain and simple.

      HOWEVER. You should not run your firewall on your general purpose computer.

      A dedicated firewall defaults to being "safe" out of the box, unlike your typical operating system. It doesn't have a lot of crap running on it that could be compromised. The amount of software on there is minimal (depend on that... the economics of mass producing hardware enforces that rule for you).

      Another way to think about it is: if the hacker is battling to get into your network, would you rather have him hacking away at a little box on the edge of your network that will probably trip alarms and if compromised just fail closed, or would you rather have him on your desktop hacking away directly trying to get in, where, when he defeats your desktop firewall, he's inside the gates?

    14. Re:RTFQ by TheLink · · Score: 1

      In my experience the only difference between hardware and software is:

      1) software- you configure most of it.
      2) hardware- someone else configures most of it.

      If you ask the CEO, almost everything is hardware.

      Whereas if you ask an Intel microprocessor engineer, even the P4 is "software" - they can change how it behaves by altering the microcode (which is how some CPU bugs can be fixed).

      Plenty of other examples - BIOS, routers, switches, heck even VCRs.

      --
    15. Re:RTFQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NAT is not a firewall (and generally doesn't have the effect of a firewall either). A firewall is a separate concept and if you have NAT without firewalling, your system is not necessarily secure. (Hint: there are situations where an attacker can directly address your "private" network. In this case NAT doesn't do you any good, because it simply won't be invoked.)

    16. Re:RTFQ by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      ... can be implemented...

      But are they????

    17. Re:RTFQ by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Perhaps a better re-statement of your point is to say that you should use a seperate non-windows-based firewall rather than one which is installed locally on the windows machine.

      That's what I meant. Running a firewall on the same box you're looking to protect is silly. We've already seen in the past that malicious e-mail viruses can and do disable anti-virus software and "software" firewalls installed on Windows boxes.

    18. Re:RTFQ by hackus · · Score: 1

      Interesting point.....actually...

      I am preparing a summary right now that recommends dumping a large bulk of Cisco hardware and replacing them with Linux boxes.....all really software firewalls and software base VPN connectivity.

      Cisco router/security gear in the lower to mid tier range is way over priced.

      The concentrator equipment is nice though including the 2948G's they use to sell and the current 2950's.

      Both are my favorite concentrator for copper and fiber...or the Cisco 5000 series for fiber.

      In any case, I thought it was interesting that someone proposed that throwing away your Cisco router and security equipment for a software wholly replacement is off the wall.

      It isn't. Many cases Linux will do the job very nicely....if not better cheaper, faster.

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    19. Re:RTFQ by fataugie · · Score: 1

      No no no,
      to be consistant, you have to throw out your OpenBSD box and install ZoneAlarm on your windows box. Aren't you dedicating a box (hardware) to run your software solution?

      I know Cisco's are expensive, I don't own one because of that. However, do you know WHY they are expensive? Because they are optimized, they are specialized. They have consistant results. Something you can't necessarily say about ZoneAlarm. Cisco ships their products knowing the memory and the processor will handle a certain load and that they don't have to compete with other software for resources.

      When you install ZoneAlarm (or any other software firewall on the same host you will be using for your everyday computer), you're betting the farm on unpredictable combinations of software and hardware. Something that Cisco (and other hardware firewalls) have already taken into account and spec'd accordingly.

      I used to run a setup similar to yours. LEAF (www.leaf-project.org) on a dedicated box. I ran that setup for many years. I just thought the original statement you made was rather ignorant.

      I stand by my statement that if it was so simple when firewalls were concerned, that corporations could just get rid of the huge $$$ Cisco Support contracts and just throw a few copies of (insert favorite software firewall running on the client here) to the employees and forget it.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    20. Re:RTFQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow and I thought I was a moron.

      No, we aren't saying that Fortune 500 companies should throw their Cisco PiX firewalls away. But what he/she (original poster) was trying to say was that firewall descisions are usually made by software. That software may be Zebra (http://www.zebra.org/) running on Linux or it could be whatever cisco uses for its PiX firewalls. It really could be any Operating System on any architecture running some decent networking software. Even Windows if you can believe that.

      One thing to note is that some of the Layer 2 and Layer 3 switches have descision making hard coded into the chips. This was done to increase the speed of the switches. What this means is the descisions _are_ being made by the hardware. It doesn't seem like a hardware firewall could be to far away from these types of switches. So maybe the hardware firewall vendors aren't selling smoke and mirrors.

      Either way, the company I work for is too cheap to purchase anything with a cisco logo on it; so I like the software that allows me to recycle old hardware and setup my own firewalls and routers.

  97. Get a router to act as a firewall first. by kawabago · · Score: 0

    A wifi router can be had for $20 if you shop around. Once the drive is reformatted reinstall XP. Disable File and Printer Sharing. Enable the Firewall. The router firewall will protect you while you update windows and norton.

  98. Heh by kastberg · · Score: 2, Informative

    What about using Tiny Personal Firewall? It fits on a floppy (last time i checked atleast)

  99. Easy by Tridus · · Score: 1

    Take that piece of crap Norton and toss it out the window.

    Turn on the XP Firewall. Leave it on. Grab the updates.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  100. Wow how ironic by wazerface · · Score: 1

    Wow how ironic, just an hour ago I reinstall Windows Xp Home for a friend, and it was attacked 5 minutes into a connection to the internet. Thats quite sad. Well for a solution, I just enabled the builtin firewall to deny all incoming connection... I assume that would do it.

  101. Ah, life on the NAT by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    At work we're NATed, at home I've got XP's Internet connection sharing plus an ADSL NAT router WiFi access point four port switch just waiting for the time I can finally find a decent ADSL service. I'd never give an unpatched PC a live IP address, Windows or Linux.

  102. Quite simple ... by Gnascher · · Score: 1

    All you need is a NAT ... probably should have one anyway, since they are a very effective means of being the first line of defense for the worm du jour anyway. -G

    --
    It's not my fault! It was this way when I got here.
  103. NAT Router is your friend by Natchswing · · Score: 1
    Take your linux machine, add another network card, and follow the simple HOWTO to NAT that additional card and attach your vulnerable windows box to the network through the NAT'd card. Not allowing new incoming connections through the linux NAT router is a great way to block all viruses and worms.

    I've installed a few new windows machines this way. Insert the network card into your existing linux box, activate the routing, and go!

  104. NAT router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a NAT router

  105. Heres my solution by wazerface · · Score: 1

    Step one: Obtain dicount priced grill lighter.
    Step two: Locate your windows Xp Home cd.
    Step three: Burn. Step four: http://www.linuxiso.org/

  106. i would like a switch by doorbender · · Score: 1

    I would like to see a switch between every networked PC. As I have been led to believe that _SHOULD_ stamp out packet sniffing.

    Not to mention the HUGE TRACKS of bandwidth that could be gained.

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
    1. Re:i would like a switch by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      you can flood most switches into a promiscuous mode. They will now act like a hub and you can sniff all you want.. Also, you can drop behind the switch and get the mac adresses of the other computers and then masq your own fooling the switch into sending you the packets instead. It is somewhat amazing what you can do with packets. not to mention getting the username and password from the person currently loged inot the computer. thats why you should never run as root.

  107. Upgrade by maxdamage · · Score: 1

    Install 98 and upgrade? I have never had this problem before when installing XP and I use roadrunner. You could download the sp1 net install with linux and burn it if you had to.

  108. autopatcher by gummijoh · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I always keep Autopatcher on a cd nearby when I am doing this. Autopatcher is just the windowsupdate site on a cd with some goodies aswell. Check it out at autopatcher.org

  109. Dont turn the firewall off!! by sjwt · · Score: 1

    Admitlay i havent done an update in ages,
    but i dont recall ever turning off my firewall..

    Its a recomendation not a neseity.

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  110. Easy step to avoid worm infection during updates by shurdeek · · Score: 1
    One of my specializations is LAN protection from virii/worms, so I know how to help: remove the "Microsoft network service" or whatever it is called in your language from the unneeded network devices (generally all). Your steps will then look something like this:

    1. Unplug
    2. Install
    3. Remove service from cards
    4. Reboot
    5. Plug back in
    6. www.windowsupdate.com
    7. (if required) install an antivirus

    Enjoy!

  111. Safety first by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    The answer is simple: get hold of a copy of Tiny Software's Personal Firewall (or any other good free firewall) and install it PRIOR to connecting to the Internet! That's much easier (and safer) than waiting around for an update CD from Microsoft that will still not prevent you from getting cracked.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  112. you are a dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've installed so many xp home and pro instances on alot of peoples computers (home users). they had no antivirus OR firewall, and never once got a virus before i got all the windows updates. once i had all of them, i THEN installed norton and zone alarm pro. updated those definitions, and ran them. had a perfectly clean machine. from the looks of this article, it's a troll waiting for loads of microsoft bashing from /.

    1. Re:you are a dumbass by east+coast · · Score: 1

      from the looks of this article, it's a troll waiting for loads of microsoft bashing from /.

      Yeah and from the looks of the replies they hit their mark. To be very frank about the matter it seems that this person is either outright lying or doing something to go out of his way to make this an issue. Note that the user never mentions the infection. That alone makes this article suspect to me.

      Not to pat Bill Gates on the back but this just sounds too extraordinary to be true.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  113. This is 2004 -- Why a direct connection to 'net? by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    Dufus. Not that most don't make the same mistake, but for a long-time Linux user NOT to have a physicially seperate stateful firewall between a PC and the Internet...sorry, "dufus" is mild.

    If you even have a "Kirkland" (i.e., sold at Costco; could be Linksys, DLink or Netgear, etc.) Broadband Router/Gateway with WiFi for sharing your home connection, you'd solve most of your troubles.

    However, on a Windows LAN I would recommend having an isolated subnet with its own Internet connection (at least one without routing of traffic to/from the main LAN) until all current patches and SPs are installed. This is keeping in principle of not sharing a network connection with unfiltered Windows boxes.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  114. autopatcher by JavaPunk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    http://www.autopatcher.com/index.html I have used this great windows patch tool. It is around a 500mb zip file. It also contains the latest JRE

  115. Why dont you.. by vern0n · · Score: 1

    You could download the network install of XP SP1 or even SP2 RC2 using Linux, then burnt it. That way when you need to install XP SP1/2 on Windows you wont need the net, just pop in the cd and let it in stall

  116. Buy a Linksys Broadband Router by pixel_bc · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... or any brand name for that matter. My windows box is behind one of these and I've never had any problems. You can choose to forward any ports you DO care about (it blocks by default), and you can also set up some cool net policy stuff on the later models.

    Seriously -- you can pick one of these puppys up for about $50... and they're incredibally functional if you ever decide to start you own little home network (5 ports is the norm for the price).

    1. Re:Buy a Linksys Broadband Router by mabu · · Score: 1

      I second this. The likelihood of getting nailed behind a Linksys while you're patching the system is pretty slim. Just set up a VPN and start patching. It's a more realitic approach than all the other singing and dancing.

  117. argh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do people even put up with this shit, it's Microsoft's f*cking duty to provide a working operating system, we pay for it!

  118. a neat utility that solves the problem... by joshds · · Score: 1

    To solve the need-to-windows-update-and-install-antivirus-befor e-being-wormed problem, follow the aforementioned steps for the windows install (offline), then have your 'autopatcher' cd ready: autopatcher

    This neat utlity lets you download an iso that has pretty up-to-date windows updates/patches -- and it has its own version of 'windows update' for XP/2000 as well. It works nicely to get your machine pretty up to date, before you go live on the internet.

  119. I don't give a DAMN what Microsoft says. by grioghar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    " Start to pull down Service Pack One; per Microsoft's instructions, all firewalls are turned off."

    Firewall is on before I connect to my cable modem if you're going to be DUMB enough to connect it without a hardware firewall protecting the machine. Get an intermediary device like a Linksys or Netgear router, and now you don't have to worry about it. And seriously. Don't install your AV until AFTER you've installed all your updates. You're only complicating the registry before it needs to be.

    Seriously, is Slashdot a "News for Nerds", or "HOWTOs for N00bs"? Some of these questions would be better handled by Google and half a brain about networking.

    --
    Can you ping me now? Gooood! | Manhappenin.Net - Things to do
    1. Re:I don't give a DAMN what Microsoft says. by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      eriously, is Slashdot a "News for Nerds", or "HOWTOs for N00bs"?

      It's "HOWTOs for CHEAP N00bs". Getting a Linksys or other router is by far the cheapest solution to this problem, no matter what the OS, yet apparently it's more appealing to download updates, burn them to CD, then jump through a few more hoops - instead of forking over the 50-odd bucks for a router.

  120. i seem to be missing something by Ryunosuke · · Score: 1

    I've installed at last count close to 30 xp (home and pro) boxes, all from scratch in the last year (and not a single virus from any of them) ... and I fail to see how you can get a virus/cracked in the matter of an hour (or three, or however long the instal takes). I instal/update, instal FW, and then Av. I'll admit I'm no guru, but where are these coming from? Are you checking email w/outlook before installing patches, or downloading pr0n or something?

  121. 65 boxes, no problem. by nickmacey · · Score: 1

    I've installed and configured over 60 brand new Dell systems (wipe, then install XP Pro) in the last 3 weeks and I have not had 1 one make it through WU. I didn't even burn everything to a CD to distribute. To me, this shows that yes, I am an idiot for not making it easier on myself, but as well, that it just depends where you are on the net, I guess.

    --
    --- nick
  122. Howto from SANS Institute Storm Center by MDFedderly · · Score: 2, Informative

    step 1:
    do not connect the pc to any phone or network and no wireless connections either.

    step 2: install winxp

    step 3: admin password
    --at least 8 chars long
    --letters numbers AND other charactors
    --not a dictionary word
    --not easily guessed

    step 3: networking setup
    choose custom
    unselect client for msft networks
    unselect file and printer sharing
    (you can enable after it's all patched up)

    on the 'will this computer coneect to the internet directly...' dialog, select the proper settings as they will be, but it still should not be plugged into the network

    don't activate, remind every few days

    step 4: user accounts
    setup whatever user accounts you need, same rules apply to passwords. also, if your account has no password, it will not be accessable through the network.

    step 5: verify network settings
    in the network connections dialog, for each connection,
    -- make sure client for msft networks and file & printer sharing are STILL off
    -- turn on the windows based firewall

    reboot now

    step 6: windows update pass 1
    -- you can now get online, because you should be safe enough with the firewalling set up

    step 7: run windowsupdate/reboot as needed until the system is FULLY patched.

    step 8: install other software, such as virus checking.

    (it's still a bad idea to disable the firewall, but it's much safer now than before)

    for the pdf guide that I basically copied here, check
    http://isc.sans.org

  123. Re:Its easy... go to grc.com by acariquara · · Score: 2, Informative
    As the title says, there IS a single-step solution, at least for the Blaster variants and other things that attack DCOM service.

    Go to grc.com and get DCOMbobulate, click DCOMbobulate me! and you are safe from those worms.

    While you are at it, get also the UPNP disabler and Shoot the Messenger! to avoid getting popups offering U N I V E R S I T Y D I P L O M A S (yuck)

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  124. All you have to do is read the online guide. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1, Informative

    There's a guide called "Surviving the First Day of Windows XP". Google it; I'll abstain. You should do this:

    Basically, do this:
    1. Install your hardware firewall. Configure it using the guidelines at Gibson Research. If your time's not worth the $30 for an on-sale router, don't bother installing anything and stop reading, since you're not worth my time.
    2. Get your fresh install completed. Bring a book.
    3. Disable messenger, server, and enable the XP firewall. Check with black viper to see what's safe to disable. (Hint: almost everything!)
    4. Install an antivirus program.
    5. Update your virus program.
    6. Download your critical patches. DO NOT INSTALL ANYTHING BUT CRITICAL PATCHES.
    7. Update your hosts file using Mike Skalla's ad blocking file. (Google for Mike's ad blocking)
    8. Download Spybot-search and destroy. It has an immunize feature to stop a lot of processes from running.
    9. Now you can update your non-critical files. This includes thing like driver updates, DirectX, etc. If you're keen, Spybot will check for registry changes so you can keep your eye out for spyware.
    10. Check with Gibson Research again, and see if you've got a full green spread on the scan.

    That's it. You can now enjoy a year or so of XP use before you have to go through this again.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  125. eh by TheDarkRogue · · Score: 1

    Burn a CD with the latest norton defs, windows service pack 1, all those little updates for the trojans, and a firewall (I personally like Kerio Personal Firewall), and install that before you even put the network cable back in.

    --
    (Score:0, Interesting)
  126. 0. Load Linux CD my mistake by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    oops! Did I really mean to do that!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  127. This is insane by tentimestwenty · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I've read the unending Slashdot commentary berating Windows and have always assumed that most people that used Windows just didn't care enough to let the bad things bother them. But this is insane- not even being able to install your OS before your computer is infected with a virus?!! I can't believe anybody would put up with this. It would take me 10 seconds to ditch the thing never to be tried again. I'm a Mac user so maybe my ease of use expectations are high but how stupid do you have to be to choose a product that does that to you?

    1. Re:This is insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average Dell/Gateway/HP/Compaq buyer doesn't think he has a choice. Most users don't WANT to know how it works, or have to think about using it. They just want to plug it in, and march happily on.

      Micro$oft doesn't want to pay people for the time it takes to properly put a good, secure OS together. And so it goes.

      At least we have Linux, for now. And we should try not to get too elitist about it. It makes us look like gods to be able to fix all this stuff for them. ;-)

    2. Re:This is insane by Beer_Smurf · · Score: 1

      I also have to ask the question, Why?
      I thought this whole thread was a joke, but it seems you guys are serious.
      Why would anyone put up with this kind of nonsense to use a product?
      What is the thinking here?

    3. Re:This is insane by woefulhc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For the most part, people don't realize there are other options. (Check any number of previous /. discussions.) In certain instances they don't know they have other options. Dell/HP/Compaq/Gateway don't offer Linux. They tell you they include Windows.

      In other cases they literally do NOT have a choice. My brother in law is headed to medical shcool. He was presented with a list of requirements for his computer. One of those is that the computer have Windows XP Professional installed. Half of the requirements are to prevent the students' computers from bringing down the school's network. All of those could be met by using a Mac or installing Linux. Neither is presented as an option. It will take considerably more effort on my brother in law's part to find out if he can use a Linux computer than it would to just click on the "purchase here" link.

      I've strongly suggested that he make the effort to see if he can use Linux and avoid having to purchase the software they recommend (which cost more than the hardware). However, he isn't so interested in that effort or the effort the might be required in running a linux box.

      I have no question why he thinks his only option is a Windows computer. He wants to be a physical therapist, not a computer expert.

      --
      Paul
  128. Holy christ by g0at · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Unbelievable. Is this really what windows people have to deal with for a common vanilla install? With Microsoft's recommended and most current product? Does Microsoft not sell a version on CD which is actually secure enough to install out of the box?

    How about instead switching to an operating system you can put faith in?

    -b

  129. Super Easy Solution (tm) by calebb · · Score: 1

    >> Autopatcher XP is for Windows XP with Service Pack 1 or 1a.
    >> It won't help you if you don't have these installed yet
    >> (i.e. new installation from original XP disk).


    Download WinXP SP1 and Autopatcher.

    In fact, they'll both fit on one CD ;-)

    1. Re:Super Easy Solution (tm) by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1

      Autopatcher still doesn't solve the problem of installing Windows XP without getting infected during SP1 installation. I don't even know what the purpose of Autopatcher is, what's wrong with the XP automatic updater?

    2. Re:Super Easy Solution (tm) by calebb · · Score: 1

      ??????

      With the two links in my previous post, you can download Autopatcher & WinXP SP1 from a different computer, burn them to a CD (once and for all), then use them on a new install of Windows XP!

      The point of AutopatcherXP? (vs. just windowsupdate?)
      Well, with Windowsupdate, you install IE6 SP1, reboot,
      WinXP SP1, reboot,
      WinXP Security Rollup, reboot,
      28 remaining critical updates, reboot,
      DirectX 9, reboot,
      Windows Media Player 9, optional reboot.

      With autopatchxp, you run it, click install, come back in 30 minutes and reboot once - and it's all done!

      Now do you see what its purpose is??

    3. Re:Super Easy Solution (tm) by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1
      Now do you see what its purpose is??


      Not really. If we're already burning a CD we can just slipstream SP1 which takes care of most of those reboots.

    4. Re:Super Easy Solution (tm) by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

      You're still vulnerable to recent viruses which directly attack your machine through no fault of your own with SP1. Using autopatcher lets you get the relevant fixes (and everything else) offline, before you connect to the internet.

  130. For under $35, this will do the trick by Helevius · · Score: 1
    How about a specific product endorsement from a disinterested third party? Check out the NR041 from Network Everywhere (some sort of Linksys/Cisco sub-unit). It's the cheapest full-feature SOHO NAT gateway I've found. I recommend them to parents and friends operating Windows systems. You can pick one up at Buy.com for just under $35, and shipping is free.

    Enjoy,

    Helevius

  131. Microsoft Instructions? by The+Dark · · Score: 1

    I can't find any instructions for Microsoft saying to turn off firewalls during SP1 installation (using google).
    Does anyone know where it says that?
    Even if it does say that, why on earth, after two virus attacks, wouldn't you try leaving it switched on while downloading the service pack to see what happens? (unless you just want to get an article posted on Slashdot).

    --
    sig's not here
  132. A little Trcik to bypass the Worm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the following before you put your machine on the net.

    Start -> Programs -> Administrative tools -> Services - > Find the service called Remote procedure call (RPC) - Right Click and Select Properties -> Click the recovery Tab - Set all the drop downs to "Take no Action". Now reboot (of course). Now put the machine back on the net to do the windows update and you should be right.

    * This is not a fix it just buys you some more time to get the updates down before your machine is overwhelmed by worms.

    I suggest getting the smallest most critical updates before the larger service packs as they will take longer to download.

  133. Addendum by Spetiam · · Score: 1

    Between steps 3 and 4:

    Make sure the firewall is active before you plug in the network cable.

  134. If you install from already running Windows... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    I recently installed XP from a running copy of Win2k. It had an option to go download fromm automatic update and install with those changes in place. Sadly, this rules out the "wipe the drive" sort of install, plus it assumes that you already have a patched Windows install running. However, if you're doing a 'clean up the registry' sort of reinstall as opposed to a new machine install, this is viable.

    I really wish Microsoft would allow one to create an 'Automatic Update' cd that you can download from a secured source. Pop that in before Windows goes online and run all that stuff. That'd be useful for any OS, really. Oh well, guess MS won't innovate there until somebody else does.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:If you install from already running Windows... by Peyna · · Score: 1

      I really wish Microsoft would allow one to create an 'Automatic Update' cd that you can download from a secured source. Pop that in before Windows goes online and run all that stuff. That'd be useful for any OS, really. Oh well, guess MS won't innovate there until somebody else does.

      You can do that already; each of the security packs can be downloaded independent of Windows Update and be put on a CD which you can install later without putting the computer on a network to do so. Incidently, the only patch required to fix the problem is the article is the one for the Sasser worm, which could even fit on a floppy disk.

      --
      What?
  135. Solution for people without firewalls by t_allardyce · · Score: 0, Troll

    Assuming you dont have separate firewall or CD with some tools on it:

    1) Connect to net.
    2) Launch IE, goto google as quickly as you can
    3) Search for "xxx", "hardcore horse fuck", or "warez cracks serials"
    4) Open as many sites as you can in a new window
    5) These will sporn pop-up windows and slow your net connection down enough so that you might be free from incomming attacks (if you can download videos even better).
    6) Download your updates and gradually close excess windows to divert bandwidth to your update downloading.
    7) Disconnect

    As a side-effect you will certainly catch some ad-ware/spy-ware but its better then getting a worm, and you can think of it as a metaphore - with IE, unprotected browsing is the same as unprotected sex with 300 annoying people that keep offering to sell you wireless spy cams. But unlike your dick, you never have to use IE again, so close it down and install Firefox.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  136. Let me count the ways... by nachoboy · · Score: 1

    There are several ways to accomplish what you're doing. Note that instead of specific instructions (install patch X, Y, Z) that will be out of date very quickly, these instructions are meant to be general and apply to Win2000/WinXP/Win2003 now and in the future.

    First thing I would recommend is slipstreaming the latest service pack. At the time of writing, Service Pack 1 is the latest available for Windows XP. Service Pack 2 is not yet here but two release candidates have been published. Expect the final to be out in a month or so. (Note: despite the marketing brouhaha about how much "more secure" SP2 will be, it looks like they've got a lot of things right. I would definitely download it and re-slipstream when it comes out.) Slipstreaming is the process of combining newer patched files with your original install files such that when you run your install, the update is already applied. There are plenty of instructions on the net, google for "slipstream windows service pack" or something similar. This one process (that boils down to mostly getting the files in the right place and running one command line) will save you hours of waiting, download, and patching later. Invest the time to do it now.

    Second thing is to download the latest patches. This is much more difficult as you're never sure which patches apply, which ones have been superceded, which ones are relevant or have to be installed separately, etc etc etc. For Windows XP, start with Rollup 1 for Windows XP and work your way up from there. The Microsoft Technet Security Bulletin Search is a good reference point. At a minimum, you'll want to locate the latest IE patch (these are usually cumulative) and the latest patch dealing with RPC (this is the vulnerable component exploited by Blaster/Welchia), and the latest patch dealing with LSASS (this is the vulnerable component exploited by Sasser).

    Third, prepare yourself. Burn relevant patches to CD. Physically disconnect your workstation from the network. Only now should you initiate your install.

    Post-install, apply all the service packs/patches you've accumulated FROM CD. Notice we have not connected to the network yet. Some patches have optional reboots (ie, they require a reboot to take effect but do not a force a reboot as part of the patching process). Make sure you have rebooted after applying the last patch. If you're on Windows XP or 2003, enable the firewall for your network connection. Look in the properties of your Internet connection - the procedure varies slightly for Windows XP, XP SP1, XP SP2, and Server 2003.

    NOW you can plug in your net connection. Hit Windows Update first. I'm not sure which guidelines recommend turning off your firewall, but ignore those unless you experience problems. Windows Update will operate just fine with only HTTP (80) and HTTPS (443) access. Get all the latest patches, and reboot. When installing applications, make sure to patch those along the way as well and you should be protected. Depending on who will be using the computer and how proactively you will be admin'ing, I would turn on the Automatic Updates feature now - download AND install automatically.

    An excellent tool to help you along the way is the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer. It's meant to scan for not only patches but security misconfigurations and other potential vulnerabilities as well. It's packaged as a .msi but once it's installed you'll find mbsacli.exe in the install directory, which you can burn to CD (along with supporting .dll files) to serve as an offline, command-line scanner. I make it a point to grab the latest

  137. Re:IP Theft and The Linux Community by Tezkah · · Score: 1

    Thanks Mr. Gates, only you could describe the Xbox as a "bitching game machine".

  138. Disable RPC over TCP/IP by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

    I ran into this problem about a year ago. Figuring the attacks were using the RPC exploit that was making the news about that time, I disabled RPC over TCP/IP and was able to patch with no further trouble. Accepting RPCs over TCP probably has a purpose in some enterprise environment, but not for me, so I left it off.

    I don't know if the current attacks are using the same route, but if you want to try, just find HKEY_CURRENT_MACHINE/SOFTWARE/Microsoft/Rpc/DCOM Protocols in the registry and take ncacn_tcpip out of the string. Probably have to reboot.

    --
    For great justice.
  139. more accurate reflection of install steps by The_reformant · · Score: 1

    1. Log on to slashdot 2. Pretend i make enough money to actually afford a copy of windows XP pro and norton 3. Play on collective community fears about internet worms 4. Make bogus claims on alleged damage caused 5. Revel in kudos received from embittered slashdot community 6. ??? 7. Profit ive installed windows thousands of times (literally) in the most unsevure environment and have never had it rendered unusable before even installing. I suggest you stay away from those ropey sites offerening downloads of free XXX pron if i were you.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
  140. Client for Microsoft Networks by fazil · · Score: 1



    If you uncheck both Client for Microsoft Networks and File and Printer Sharing, in your network adapter properties.. you'll be able to surf pretty safe from infection.

    That'll turn off all the NetBIOS stuff.. the only thing you should have checked in your network settings before you go online, should be TCP/IP

    --
    -=-Ze End-=-
  141. Norton Firewall was already on, guys. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    Even when its updating, the Norton Firewall is active.

    1. Re:Norton Firewall was already on, guys. by Duc+de+Montebello · · Score: 1

      Even when its updating, the Norton Firewall is active.

      Then how does his computer get hosed?

      Why doesn't Norton's firewall work after the computer is connected?

      I have never had this problem, maybe because I have always had either had a non-Nortons firewall installed, or been behind a hardware firewall. Am I missing something here?

      --
      "If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes should fall like a house of cards. Checkmate." - Zapp Brannigan
  142. Re: doh....go to grcsucks.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    By the time you've downloaded DCOMbobulate with an unpatched/unprotected, freshly installed XP machine, you'll be infected (unless you're behind a router). Best bet is to disconnect the machine from any network and do the following immediately after the install:
    1. Click on Start -> Programs -> Administrative Tools - Component Services
    2. On the left-hand window pane, expand Component Services -> Computers
    3. Right-click My Computer and select Properties
    4. Click the Default Properties tab
    5. Uncheck the Enable Distributed COM on this computer checkbox.
    6. Click OK and close the Component Services console window.
  143. simple by Prong_Thunder · · Score: 1

    You can abort a system shutdown by issuing the command
    shutdown /a

    if you want something a little more permanent, type
    services.msc
    in the command line, then find "RPC Service" (or whatever), right-click, choose properties, find where it says "after failures" and set them all to "no action". Reboot and patch, and virus-scan and patch and rinse and repeat...

  144. Steps to a clean windows xp install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) download Autopatcher XP (full) here: http://www.autopatcher.com/
    This program Has all the recent updates needed and wanted, plus a ton of extra features suck as the uxtheme.dll patch, tweak ui, directx 9, wmp 9, and a whole lot more.
    2) Burn Autopatcher to CD or copy to any apropriate internal network source
    3) unplug machine from any external network connection
    4) install Windows XP
    5) run autopatcher XP and select the updates you want
    6) wait...
    7) Voila! Done ;)

    Note: You will need to install the latest service pack to Windows XP before you can run this. Download SP1a Here: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/updat es/sp1/network.mspx
    Simply burn it to the same CD and you have your own windows xp install solution... virus/"problem" free as well

    1. Re:Steps to a clean windows xp install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8) oops - plug in the external network connection afterwords =\

  145. A few suggestions... by Strenoth · · Score: 1

    A) Leave the firewalls on. Yes, I know MS says otherwise. I always have both a hardware and software firewall on, no problems what so ever.

    B) Get a router with a firewall. I currently happen to be on a Linksys wireless router which is attached to cable broadband. It works very well, and contains it's own firewall.

    C) To repeat something that others have said, get a copy of SP1 and burn it to disk, install that before trying to log onto MS for your other updates.

    --

    "It takes a very long time to count to 2 in binary." ~'Fourlegged'

  146. Simple! by out+of+control · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't install Windows! Use Linux!

  147. I guess this settles it. by cybrchld · · Score: 1

    It doesn't take an Uber-geek to get Linux running. If you cant load a simple windows XP install and patched up. I recommend you stick with Linux. Or Better yet take your pc into circuit city or best buy for repair.

  148. Simple solution by nwf · · Score: 1

    Install from a hacked/pirated copy of Windows, and you won't have to wait to become infected! No network connection even needed during the install.

    --
    I don't know, but it works for me.
  149. What about IPCOP or Smoothwall? by IsPsleepwalker · · Score: 1

    Why spend money on a cheap router when you can use an old PC as a router/firewall. IPCOP is a free linux firewall distro that turns an old PC into a stateful firewall and more. Plus, these distros find a good use for an old PC that is just collecting dust!

  150. I CALL BULLSHIT ON ARTICLE by benna · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has many security hole's its very very true. However, the way you get worms that just install themselves, there has to be an infected machine that scans and finds you have a vulnerablity, and then exploits it. I just don't buy that this happened TWICE. Even once would be very rare. This feels like anti MS propoganda to me (believe me my anti MS qualifications are in order, but some but don't stick to the facts, which are in linux's favor anyway). If by some remarkably bad luck this actually did happen, I would advise you to just try again, the chances of it happening a 3rd time are very very slim.

    --
    "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    1. Re:I CALL BULLSHIT ON ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not necessarily true. I've had this happen to me three of four times before I finally gave up and did an offline installation with 3rd party update solutions (Autopatcher XP)

    2. Re:I CALL BULLSHIT ON ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is because you are a fucking moron... You probaby pay for a 'decent' media player and pop-up stopper, too.

      HAHAHAHAHA

    3. Re:I CALL BULLSHIT ON ARTICLE by reynhout · · Score: 1

      It would be a great set up if it weren't true.

      Unfortunately, it's very true. If you read your firewall log, you'll see the proof.

      Remember that several worms give preference to IPs with the first three (then two) octets identical to the infector host. So on a big ISP net, scans will be higher than on a corporate net.. Twenty minutes is a long time.

    4. Re:I CALL BULLSHIT ON ARTICLE by binaryspiral · · Score: 2, Informative

      Benna, you're ignorant if you think it's bullshit - infected zombie machines are common and infect people quickly.

      Want proof these worms are targeting every IP out there - go visit dshield.org, and you'll see what the Internet is dealing with.

      My firewall logs a regular blip of hits on port 445, 25, 135, 3127, 1434, 1433.

      All of these are various worms looking for an unprotected host. Until then... keep using linux, you're much better off.

      It's almost common for a fresh install to be infected on the first few minutes of connection to the Internet - Microsoft made it far to easy.

    5. Re:I CALL BULLSHIT ON ARTICLE by mark-t · · Score: 1
      It is very true, I'm afraid... out of the box, Windows simply has too many vulnerabilities to be left unprotected on the internet. At a minimum, the latest service pack needs to be installed before you connect to the Internet or else you need to be behind a firewall which will shield these attacks. Multiple times, I've seen systems that have been freshly installed attacked and infected within 60 seconds of connecting to the internet, (and Outlook was not in any way involved, btw... in fact, no additional software was installed yet). Infection can happen so fast that sometimes there isn't even enough time after the system is connected to the Internet before the attack and infection occurs to download the appropriate patch or service pack that fixes the vulnerability! The nature of many of these attacks is such that the vulnerable computer is forced to reboot, which can make it altogether impossible to download the fixes.

      This isn't about being anti-MS... this is the plain and simple truth. These issues will certainly be addressed in their next release, of course, but out of the box, Windows XP is simply not an operating system that can safely be connected to the Internet without some form of shielding.

    6. Re:I CALL BULLSHIT ON ARTICLE by benna · · Score: 1

      Norton should be blocking those ports though. I do see the scanning in my logs but not every 20 minutes.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    7. Re:I CALL BULLSHIT ON ARTICLE by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      Your ISP may be a bit smarter than most and blocking the most offensive ports... I wish mine was, but it's only blocking port 25 system wide - to slow down the spam zombies. But this prevents me from using my own domain's smtp server instead of my ISP's shitty one. :-(

  151. XP software firewall is useless before SP2 by majid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is not active during startup or shutdown. This window of vulnerability will be fixed in SP2. That said, I wouldn't trust a "firewall" written by people clueless enough not to enable it before the network stack goes up.

    1. Re:XP software firewall is useless before SP2 by initialE · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well if you don't trust the built-in firewall, just turn on the IP filter before patching. It's under IP settings->Advanced->Options-> TCP-IP filter
      Enable only IP port 80 and you're set. Heh or you can do what Scott Riley down at Redmond recommends and use IPSec to specify rules...

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    2. Re:XP software firewall is useless before SP2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SP2 will start the firewall service first at boot and shut it down last at shutdown.

      SP2 really will solve all these sorts of woes....they just have to hurry up and release the [final of the] damn thing!!

  152. Re:Have to buy broadband first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, you need broadband in order to use a router. If you live some place where there is no broadband you either have to get sattelite or use a linux box. A hardware firewall/router that supports dialup does not exist at all.

  153. You're a fucking jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And nobody cares about your name.


    (Posting anonymously to preserve my precious karma.)

    1. Re:You're a fucking jackass by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      My name could be deduced from my initials, if you were smart enough. Since your not, who cares?

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  154. Have you ever heard of a firewall... by nberardi · · Score: 1

    Have you ever heard of a firewall or a virus scanner? Come on millions of people do this every week, and they don't have problems. Why does a supposedly advanced computer user (Linux Guy) have trouble understanding the basics of security, such as a firewall and a virus scanner.

    I don't even install my e-mail client or plug in my ethernet cord before I have a virus scanner, and I always have my router blocking all incomming ports.

    This guy just sounds like a moron, or he is just trying to spread FUD. I whish /. had a better story screening process.

  155. Re:XP's firewall doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a brief period of time when booting up between when networking is loaded and when the firewall kicks in. It is possible to be infected during those few seconds you are connected to the internet unprotected.

  156. It's been said before by obeythefist · · Score: 1

    I don't quite understand what the poster is trying to do exactly, but it's pretty bizarre. Let me paraphrase:

    "Hi. I'm putting a completely unpatched Windows box directly on the internet and I'm deliberately turning off the Windows firewall *and* the third party firewall I installed. But I get virused! Whyy??? Windows sucks."

    That's just like people who build their houses on floodplains crying and moaning because God took their houses away when it rained. Then they build their new houses on the floodplain again. Some people just, well, they're just not smart. And so bad things happen to them.

    But back to the security issue - what would happen if you put a Linux box, unpatched, directly on the internet with no firewall? How long would it take to get rooted? How about if you had an insecure root password? It would take longer than Windows, but it would still happen.

    This isn't a windows problem, it's an end user problem. If you do stupid things, bad things happen to you.

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  157. Shutdown -a by Xocet_00 · · Score: 1

    When you get the shutdown warning, simply run shutdown -a at the command line to abort it. Then do your updates. The RPC service will already be dead, so you won't see another one till your reboot and restart the service.

  158. Have you ever heard of reading the post... by Winterblink · · Score: 1

    Go back and read the FULL POST.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  159. Re: by cpuenvy · · Score: 1

    Well, the first problem is installing anything before the updates. You must do service pack 1, if it is not included, as well as all IE updates.

    Also, I assume that you have a network there. Go to http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/updat es/sp1/network.mspx and download the full SP1a file.

    Immediately before connecting to Internet, install SP1a, then do all other Microsoft updates. Then, and only then, should you install any 3rd party software.

    Hope this helps.

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  160. Broadband/DSLReports.com thread... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Also, see these security forum folks.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  161. Use a NAT device by diamondsw · · Score: 1

    Or place a NAT device (such as a cheap broadband router/firewall) out in front of your computer. Since all of the worms attack via open TCP/IP ports, the NAT device will block them all while allowing you to update your computer. Works every time for me.

    --
    I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
  162. Always keep your copy of XP uptodate! by Nikker · · Score: 1
    • Copy the entire "I386" to a local directory
    • download the updates via this link Network Install
    • "Slipstream" the service pack to your local copy
    • Dump it onto a CD with a bootable image that you make so the XP install will boot right
    OR

    Get a copy of the 911 CD compiler (Linux based!!) to make an image and will even start you off with install scripts that will give you hands off operation!

    PS The 911 CD will ask you for your info (Computer name, Key, etc before the install all you have to do is type it in and your ready to go!
    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
  163. Hardware Firewall by wwwillem · · Score: 1

    You didn't mention if you were sitting behind a hardware firewall. Will cost you 50 bucks, but if you can buy XP, you can also afford :-) a Linksys, Netgear, D-Link, or whatever cable-router.
    Keep the firewall/router completely closed for external access and you should be fine. I've had unprotected Windows boxes behind a firewall running for years without a single virus.
    I'm not saying you should keep your systems unprotected (!!), but you should be fine during the time between installing and having your Anti-Virus software installed.

    --
    Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
  164. You are such a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (per Norton's recommendation, the built-in XP firewall is turned off);

    Give it up, troll. Go back to Kuro5hin.

  165. Computer Consultant by nukem996 · · Score: 1

    As my part time high school job I am a computer consultant. I have been using linux since it came out(its what my dad used so I started to use it). I fix win machine but this does including rebuilding them sometimes as well. I have that win CD with all the updates from feb but you do not need it. I start the same way you do disconnecting the machine and then formatting the drive and installing. I then have Win XP Service Pack 1 on a disc(you can find it for free to download somewere on their site) I then put that patch on(it can take awhile) then I would setup norton antivirus and firewall. Put it on the net(dont use the software the isp gives you they always suck just use the default win way). Once you have fully updated norton. Then you can finish all the updates on the win site. KEEP THE FIREWALL ON!!! I have no idea why your turned it off but you dont need to. Also a router can help with extra security(because of NAT) so if your real worried get a router(you can get an 802.11b router for $50 at staples.)

    1. Re:Computer Consultant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another one!!!

      What year did Linux come out, smart guy?

    2. Re:Computer Consultant by nukem996 · · Score: 1

      Well it came out in 91. Then I was 3 so I could actually interact with a machine. Before that I was just banging on the keyboard in DOS. Yes I guess you could say the first OS I used was DOS but I had no idea what I was doing. I didnt really interact with a computer untill 91 when linux did first come out.

  166. drrrrr, have a software firewall ready by dave1g · · Score: 1

    just install zonealarm as the first thing you do

    That is what I have always done, never had a problem.

    And if you make the mistake of waiting and get that old virus that makes the computer restart in 30 seconds. Just change the date to a month back and you have 30 days to fix up your computer.

  167. Install behind someone else's firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently installed XP myself. I took my PC to work to install it since there is a solid system of firewalls there. Not to mention an under-utilized T1 line.

  168. I don't believe this. by mt+v2.7 · · Score: 1

    I honestly don't believe that your comp was render unsuable that fast. I install Xp all the time and it's NEVER that bad. My suggestion is to DL zonealarm or some other firewall and put the install file on a CD. (on your linux box)

  169. Following Suggestions From Honeynet Project? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe learning how to setup boxen from the Honeynet Project wasn't such a good idea...

  170. Try going here instead... by Arivia · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/search.aspx?dis playlang=en If you visit the Windows Update site in anything other than IE, you'll get redirected to there-but it works in Firefox. Also easier(because of the non-ActiveX packaging) to just download and burn.

    --
    The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    1. Re:Try going here instead... by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

      That was what I thought too... but when I was looking for the URL for my post above, both Firefox and Opera were fed broken HTML that shows a blank screen, after which nothing happens >:(

      This happened visiting windowsupdate.microsoft.com and www.windowsupdate.com using FF 0.9 and Opera 7.11 (on XP). I'm not keen enough to try multiple systems/browser versions...

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
  171. Zone Alarm by SnowCrashed · · Score: 1

    Whenever I have to do a fresh Windows install, I keep a cd with Zone Alarm (along with AVG, Adaware and a few other useful tools) handy. I just install Windows, pop in the Zone Alarm cd, install, setup my internet connection and start the updates. I've never had problems updating with my ZA turned on, and it keeps my computer squeaky clean from worms. This has been my standard practice since blaster came out and has never failed me.

  172. Re:Have to buy broadband first by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1
    Not quite sure where you got your information, but with a little googling I was able to find a few routers that support dialup. Tiger Direct even has some that have dialup for backup, incase the broadband goes down.

    There are also modems that you can attach to a network for dialup. A friend of mine uses one of them.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  173. Unattended Installation by unuselessj · · Score: 0

    MSFN's Unattended XP CD might be worth looking into. It allows you to automatically install programs as well as updates. I've messed around with it a little bit and it's definately a timesaver.

  174. No unpatched system should be connected directly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If at all possaible, no system, whether Windows or *nix should ever be connected directly to the internet, whether through broadband or dialup. A cheap NAT box, properly configured, will protect a broadband connection. There are NAT solutions which will work with a dialup connection. At a minimum, a software firewall should be employed when connecting a system with dialup. Windows XP has a built in firewall which can be enabled for a dialup connection. Any *nix distribution will have one as well.

  175. avoiding virus at install time by AshuBhai · · Score: 1

    I follow the following steps :

    1) Plug of internet cable.
    2) After install turn on windows firewall.
    3) connect to internet. update windows..

    this works

    this problem is fixed in sp2, where firewall is turned on by default.

  176. DHCP lease -- Reboot Free by b4k4 · · Score: 1
    7. Configure the Roadrunner net connection and reboot to pick up a DHCP lease;

    A bit off-topic, but you don't have to reboot to pick up a DHCP address. Unless you're installing some weird software that requires a reboot (like Roadrunner Medic that they (used to?) bundle), you can just open up a command window and enter

    ipconfig /renew
    or click the Repair button in the Connection Properties -> Support tab.
  177. I'm sorry by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

    But you're a moron. Of course, you're getting viruses on your system. You are explicitly disabling your firewall.

    Re-install XP off the net, as you started, but once you've completed the install, turn on the built-in Internet Connection Firewall and leave it on. Install whatever RoadRunner gives you, connect to the Internet, and start your updates. I'm not aware of any flaws in ICF, but if you're really paranoid, buy (or build) a stand-alone firewall and put your nacent Windows box behind it.

    --
    I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
  178. Re:No hardware firewalls for dialup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Show me a hardware firewall/NAT solution for dialup that doesn't cost over $1000. The only thing I have seen is this, http://nct.symantecstore.com/0001/appliance_sfvpn2 00r.html. I have not seen anything comparable to a linksys NAT box that supports dialup connections. The only solution is an old (power hungry) linux or *BSD box, which is a royal pain to set up.

  179. Hardware firewalls. (simple iptables) by darkonc · · Score: 2, Informative
    I pretty much refuse to run a Windows box on the net without a firewall... The $40 cable routers will generally do a fine job. If you're doing it in the same place as your Linux box, you can use IP Tables to do the same thing..

    Get either a dumb hub or a crossover cable, and connect the Windows box by that.
    turn on NAT via iptables:

    • iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.0/24 --out-interface eth0 -j MASQUERADE

    • iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
      iptables -I FORWARD --in-interface eth1 --out-interface eth0 -j ACCEPT
      # turn off most packet forwarding (other than outgoing connections above) iptables --policy FORWARD DROP
    Turn on packet forwarding
    ( echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward )

    This, of course, presumes that ETH1 is facing your windows box with an IP address in 192.168.1.{1-254}.

    You can then either set your Windows box IP address manually, or learn how to turn on dhcpd (i'm not going to go there, but it's not too hard.). In any case, this should be enough NAT protection to allow you to get out on the net from your Windows box without opening it up to inbound virus connections. You can then get to places like Microsoft and Norton's without being pre-emptively infected.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  180. Like The Old Joke Says... by MacDaffy · · Score: 1
    PATIENT (raising his arm): Doctor! It hurts when I do this. What should I do?
    DOCTOR: Don't do that!

    My partner and I carry CD's with the latest patches (Blaster, Sasser, etc.), Stinger, Spybot, AdAware and CWShredder.

    The XP machine doesn't connect to the network--router or not--until are the patches are on, anti-spyware measures are installed and the built-in firewall is configured. No exceptions.

  181. What I did by Kusunose · · Score: 1

    I also had installed Windows XP Pro and Norton Anti Virus/Internet Security and updated them via Internet. I din't have any NATs nor other hardware firewalls. I did't have any update CDs at hand either. Howerver, I dit not get infected with worms/viruses. Here is what I did.

    1. Installed Windows XP on the PC, the cable modem disconnected from the network card.
    2. Turned on the Internet Connection Firewall and then connected the cable modem.
    3. Launched Windows Update and installed all security patches.
    4. Installed Norton Anti Virus and Norton Internet Security
    5. Launched the Norton update facility and get them updated.
    6. Turned off the ICF.
    By the way, I did not noticed any recommendation about turning off firewalls while doing Windows Update. Where can I see the info?

  182. Smoothwall by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

    A cheap 486 and a couple of NICs... go download yourself the free smoothwall express install and have yourself a rockhard firewall with the heart of linux protecting your Windows machine.
    Smoothwall

  183. there can be only one by ironfroggy · · Score: 1

    use another machine (linux) as a firewall and allow the XP box to connect only to microsoft.com and norton.com so that it can get the updates and do nothing else.

  184. No extra software/hardware, but some savvy. by gvc · · Score: 1

    It is simple but not necessarily obvious how to install Windows without catching something. I'm sorry if this is redundant, but I felt the need to counter the many posts that implied you need 3rd-party hardware/software.

    1. Disconnect your network and install Windows from CD. Decline the offers to register or install updates.

    2. Enable the firewall. Block everything.

    3. Run windows update and install everything it suggests.

    4. Configure windows to download updates automatically.

    5. Punch holes in your firewall if you must.

    That's it! An external router/firewall might be a a good idea to protect you from future worms, but it is not essential for safe installation of Windows.

  185. Very very simple. by skinfitz · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. Disconnect machine from net
    2. Install XP
    3. Before connecting to net, enable XP firewall. (Right click on network connection, properties, advanced, "Protect my computer.."
    4. Turn on Automatic Updates (Right click on My Computer, properties, then click tick box on automatic updates).
    5. Connect to net.
    6. Let it patch itself, or if you want, do it manually via Windows Update.

    Really, why this simple simple process seems so difficult to Linux users is beyond me. You wouldn't connect a Linux system running say, an old version of Samba or Apache to the net without IP Tables now would you?

  186. This gives me an idea by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    How does this work from the other side? "That XP install took 10 minutes! I could EASILY have 0wned him by then! I just need to attack him in mid-install, and flash his BIOS before each new install starts."

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:This gives me an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya ok...

  187. Low-tech but free: IPCop + Squid by StRex · · Score: 1

    Admittedly, this is not a perfect solution, and others have suggested solutions to help. However, the following actually works quite well for me: I'm running IPCop, and have Squid enabled with a 2GB cache size. Not a huge cache, but big enough to pick up Windows Update stuff (and small enough to deliver maximal performance on a 128MB machine with RAM to spare).

    When I install a new XP machine at home, all the updates are still in cache from my last install, so are downloaded at full wire speed.

    I just installed my second XP machine, which is when I saw that all updates pulled from cache. (I think MS is wisely very cache-friendly on Windows Update.) I know, you have to have patched a machine already on your network, but it's nice because it doesn't require any specialized tools, and it doesn't require relying on an independent site like AutoPatcher that may go away (or charge) in the future.

  188. Use xp firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1. Unplug network
    2. Install
    3. Enable xp firewall
    4. Plug network
    5. Update windows

    Always works.

  189. Worser case scenario by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    What about getting a worm in the process of installing windows which nukes your BIOS, thus preventing you from installing Linux?

    Say, this is an idea for MS. A worm which attaches itself to the BIOS, notices Grub or Lilo and refuses to boot them?

    How about the reverse? Every boot that detects an NTFS partition delivers an error message of "Sorry, Windows not supported. Try Linux."

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  190. reinstalled xp without problems by loupgarou24 · · Score: 1

    likewise samething. my last reinstall of xp (cos my 20gb hdd crashed last week). I did: a) install winxp from cd. b) hook on the net (Dlink router/bridge to ethernet modem with NAT) c) run windows update (v5) so everything here was fine. -- after that it went totally wrong when I went to one of THOSE sites.. 8) got infected immediately by the secure.html hijacker and , had to install norton/spybot to clean it up in safe mode etc. and no, I didn't have to turn off any firewalls to update norton (not that I installed any besides NAT)

  191. Firewall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Um, how about using XP's firewall, and only allowing access from windowsupdate.microsoft.com

    Problem solved by intelligent application of basic networking. Any other questions?

  192. No need to wait: by anakin357 · · Score: 1

    Get DCOM exploit/Blaster fix here: http://tinyurl.com/khuz
    Get LSASS/Sasser fix here: http://tinyurl.com/2vj4h
    (Optional) Get SP1 here:http://tinyurl.com/6lab

    Burn to CD, install updates, then run Windows Updates after that.

    OR...

    Just turn on the firewall, like everyone is suggesting.

    --
    http://www.fsckin.com/
  193. If you play a Microsft CD... by Spoticus · · Score: 5, Funny

    backwards, you can hear satanic messages. But even worse, if you play it forward, it installs their software!

    Thanks, I'll be here all week... try the veal...

  194. AUTOPATCHER by infiniteedge · · Score: 1

    1. unplug network cable
    2. install windows
    3. install windows sp1 from a cd i burned
    4. install autopatcher xp
    5. reboot and plug in network cable
    6. goats

  195. Here's a thought... by Transcendent · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Use a frekin firewall.

    You're a linux user, but you're pretty stupid.

  196. Avoid Windows Environment by HangnJudge · · Score: 1

    It is the almost homogeneous nature of the Operating systems on the internet that permit the infectiveness of the viruses. The best answer is to disperse as much as possible the fundamental languages spoken on the net. I've used PAL8, DOS, Assembler code various flavors of Windows, Unix My answer has been been Macs No viruses / worms / etc. ever for as long as I've been a user (1984) My Macs just work....

  197. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  198. Turn on built-in XP firewall by jj_mcnally · · Score: 1

    The Internet Connection Firewall offers a basic way to block inbound connections until you've got all your updates in place. Then switch to something more robust, like ZoneAlarm (www.zonelabs.com) To turn on ICF, do Properties on the NIC that's connected to the Internet. Then click the Advanced tab and check "Protect my computer and network by limiting or preventing access to this computer from the Internet" To be on the safe side leave the network cable COMPLETELY disconnected until setup is complete and the firewall is turned on.

  199. Even /.'s involved with this scanning by Malc · · Score: 1
    wolverine:/var/log/apache# grep slash access.log*
    access.log.1:slashdot.org - - [14/Jun/2004:18:10:05 -0400] "GET http://slashdot.org/ok.txt HTTP/1.0" 404 200 "-" "libwww-perl/5.76" 0 wolverine.mydomain.com -
    access.log.1:slashdot.org - - [16/Jun/2004:19:12:03 -0400] "GET http://developers.slashdot.org/ok.txt HTTP/1.0" 404 200 "-" "libwww-perl/5.76" 0 wolverine.mydomain.com -
    access.log.1:slashdot.org - - [19/Jun/2004:17:27:57 -0400] "GET http://slashdot.org/ok.txt HTTP/1.0" 404 200 "-" "libwww-perl/5.76" 1 wolverine.mydomain.com -
    wolverine:/var/log/apache#
    1. Re:Even /.'s involved with this scanning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uninstall mod_proxy, dumbass.

    2. Re:Even /.'s involved with this scanning by Malc · · Score: 1

      Dumbass? Engage your brain first before you mouth. I don't have mod_proxy installed, and besides, you'll notice my server is returning error 404.

    3. Re:Even /.'s involved with this scanning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot checks the computers of posters to ensure they are not open relays. There are lots of problems with AC troll posts through open relays; had those NOT returned 404's, you would have been told that you needed to lock down or disable your proxy in order to post.

  200. Nat/router by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 1

    No computer should be directly connected to a cable or dsl modem. A 40 dollar router can do an amazing job at blocking the majority of worms. Port forwarding only the needed services or servers will give any user anything he needs. Anyway if you get hit by one of the worms that forces continual reboots, either end process trees or tell which-ever service that is crashing not to reboot on failure. Usually it is the LSASS service that is failing.

    Could Jesus microwave a burrito so hot that he himself could not eat it?

    1. Re:Nat/router by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 1

      By the way it really time for Microsoft to revise their installer to connect to the internet and download. XP supposedly does this when you do an update from within an existing version of windows, it actually doesn't seem to update much. Most major linux distro have incorporated an update utility during installation. Suse YAST really inpresses me.

  201. Get someone else to do it... by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...because obviously you're too stupid to do it yourself.

    You say you've been using Linux since 95, yet the obvious solution of using a firewall excapes you! If you're such a linux expert then where's your iptables firewall machine? Or even your $50 router/firewall. I have one for sale for $40 if you want. That's Cdn $$ too! Man, even installing sygate, zonealarm, or any other personal firewall right after winxp is installed would prevent the shit out there from getting onto your machine.

    I've been using Linux since 95 too, but I know better to put any machine, Linux or Windows, directly on the net or in the DMZ unless that's my intention. Windows is much worse than other OS's, but I wouldn't even put a fresh linux install of any distribution on the net without doing some work on it first.

    1. Re:Get someone else to do it... by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      Try to GET ONE before it is too late. I had just the same story last night: I decided that my trustworthy media server (pIII 733 w windows 2000 sp2) is no longer actual for me so I decided to "upgrade" (replace dual cpu pII 233 w/ nt4 he uses for web browsing. Those 5 scsi hdds are pretty noisy in a bedroom) brothers machine. Since I don't have internet access at my flat (hey, home is where I should have a huge bed for chicks :D), machine was way behind latest updates - and naturally I know that and as soon as I am connected to internet (a matter of activating dhcp instead of local IP I was running before) rush to the windowsupdate.bigbadwold.outerworlds... Good luck... messenger service popups, rpc restarts, svchosts.exe @ 100% cpu usage, interesting flashing on network card... Everything can be slowly resolved, but the moment computer started to showing some concern and offer me some porno sites of his liking to relief my stress... I dumped this effort. I will be revisiting the computer today with @guard, windows 2000 sp2 install cd, hdd with sp3&4, hotfixes, firebird, antivirus & latest bases, and I already know - it's going to be a pretty fucked up evening. Internet is a dangerous place, kids...

  202. Re:No hardware firewalls for dialup by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 1

    "Show me a hardware firewall/NAT solution for dialup that doesn't cost over $1000..." Off the top of my head, I can name one for you. The SMC Barrcicade 700x series (7004ABR, 7004AWBR, etc.) includes a serial port that you can connect to an external analog or ISDN modem. Can be used as dial backup (if your broadband goes down), or can be used as the primary internet connection. You can buy the SMC7004ABR for around $80 American. E.

  203. Don't turn off the firewall by Eskarel · · Score: 1

    Simple enough, at least if you have norton or zonealarm installed, the XP firewall will kill windowsupdate(don't really know why), but neither norton nor zone will. So long as you allow the update connections quickly enough, windows update will time out if you don't allow the connections through pretty quickly.

  204. Create a CD of windows update files by comcn · · Score: 1

    Follow the instructions here to download windows update files and save them to disk. Write them to CD, and then install them on your new machine. Finally, connect to the network...

    Unfortunately, this doesn't work if you don't have another windows box around, but it can be very useful.

    You probably want to install the latest service pack first, if you've got that on CD somewhere, and then only download updates from that service pack onwards.

  205. Buy a cheap router box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would use a storebought "websafe" router from Linksys or Netgear or a couple others. Mine cost $80, I think you can get them for $50 or less now. They are all set up to ignore requests from the "Internet" port out of the box. If you make your initial requests from inside, and requests from outside are ignored for you, you should be able to complete the updates in peace.

  206. Re: Why? by xsbellx · · Score: 1

    The likelihood of getting nailed behind a Linksys while you're patching the system is pretty slim.

    I would respectfully disagree with this statement. Please see this article regarding Linksys routers or this article concerning Netgear routers.

    Just set up a VPN and start patching. It's a more realitic approach than all the other singing and dancing.

    Is it really? This idea of "I have a firewall and I am OK" is very problematic. There are several layers of defense that must be employed to provide a reasonable amount of protection. Simply relying one firewall with somewhat limited capablities is folly.

    --
    If VISTA is the answer, you didn't understand the question
  207. Are you sure? by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

    Let's not mince words -- Windows sucks. It sucks so bad it's able to completely crash on its own, without any external aid.

    Knowing this, what makes you so sure you got a virus and/or worm? Just because Windows locks up, or something else goes wrong doesn't mean your system has been infected with malicious code (well, other than Windows itself ;) ).

    This sounds like the "newbie reason for anything going wrong". Anytime a newbie sees something go wrong on their computer, they automatically presume they have a virus. Have you done a scan to verify that you have an infection, or are you just assuming there must be an infection because you had an unexpected result?

    When you get a headache after bumping your head, do you automatically assume you have an inoperable brain tumor? ;)

    Yaz.

    1. Re:Are you sure? by Stickney · · Score: 1

      I'd ask the same question. I had the (very nearly) same problem when I installed WinXP on a new computer last January. Turns out I had a RAM/Motherboard incompatibility problem, something about the frontside bus not allowing the correct latency timings for dual-channel memory...I'm no hardware hacker, way over my head, but you might check other things.

      --
      ...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
  208. Use Windows XP Firewall and/or IPSEC by Patrick+Dung · · Score: 1

    Before connecting to the internet:
    You shoud first disable any unnecessary services (say IIS).

    For Windows XP
    You can enable the firewall that comes with Windows XP. (Easy and provides the best protection.)

    For Windows 2000
    You can use IPSEC. (May be complicated and time consuming.)
    Set any IP which connect to your vulernerable ports (say, 80, 139, 445... etc) to use IPSEC.

    For Windows NT (and beyond)
    You can use the TCP/IP filtering in the network interface (not IPSEC). (Not a perfect solution, but that's the only method that I know for NT).

  209. Re:No hardware firewalls for dialup by IsPsleepwalker · · Score: 1

    The IPCOP Linux Firewall distro has built in support for dial-up using an external or ISA modem. Plus, I have a D-Link 604 router that has a serial port for a modem built in to it. That only cost me $90 2 years ago.

  210. Boot from a sacrificial external drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download the updates to the booted external drive. Make sure the internal drive is physically disconnected. Disconnect from the net. Reboot with the internal drive. Start with the external disconected. Once fully booted connect the external drive. Virus check it. Don't execute any programs on it. copy the update. Verify the size and signature match. Virus check it again, and just to be sure the whole boot disk. Dismount the external drive. Maybe do the virus check at this point, or do another one. Install the update.

    Alternately install an active virus scanner/firewall from a third party. Then connect to the net.

    NAT is not always effective as it depends on the provider not routing NAT range packets. When I was on RoadRunner in KC a few years back, we were portscanned about once an hour from another customer on the net. It looked like they were forcing the DHCP server to give up new addresses as well as they seemed to increment across the address space (for the originating IP) in our NAT'ed address space range.

    On our ISP we get around 256K bits per secound of port scan / viral payload constantly, added to that another 256-512K bps of incoming SPAM mail. That is per T1 circuit.

  211. Slipstream or try this by megabyte405 · · Score: 1

    http://www.microsoft.com/security/protect/cd/order .asp

    Free CD from Microsoft with the latest at time of pressing security updates. Throw that in immediately after install, and update the whole shebang. Then, you can put on your Norton and plug in the Internet connection. And never disable that. I rarely disable anti-virus or firewall even when an install tells me to, and I'm no worse for the wear. A nice hardware firewall (say, a Linksys router with the latest firmware) might not be so bad either.

    --
    I recognize people by their sigs. Is that a bad thing?
  212. -1, rambling by gwoodrow · · Score: 1

    A "funny only" filter is something I've dreamed about! Probably because I don't know much about technology except for what I've learned from computers crashing/breaking and having to fix them on my own. Amazing what you can learn in such a situation.

    I definitely agree that it does seem MS products have problems from the outset. I mean, am I the only one who realizes that this Ask Slashdot is basically saying - "Um, I can't even get windows to START. Can anyone give me some tips on how to make it START? Because it's NOT EVEN REALLY STARTING." It's so odd of a situation that it's laughable.

    When I bought my powerbook, I plugged in the charger and pressed the on button - and it booted up. I literally said to my cat, "Did you see that?" As usual, he just licked his balls and ignored me - but I'll be damned if the computer did actually start. I suffered through similar problems as the question poster with being attacked under windows before even getting the system operational. Hence, my PC now has Fedora and I do most of my work on a powerbook.

    Question: Did you hear how Windows plans to fix this issue?
    Answer: Neither have I.

    Thanks for the compliment too!

  213. I've had no problem by fleener · · Score: 1

    I've had no trouble doing a fresh install of Windows XP. I visit Windows Update first, before installing any other software. Of course, my router's firewall protects me from most worm traffic.

  214. Slipstream SP1 and the hotfixes. by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 1
    You can slipsteam SP1 into the ISO of the original CD. Then, if you want to take the time to do it, you can slipstream each hotfix directly into the i386 folder as well. Once your done, you can use use a program like WinISO to build a new install CD with the Service Pack and all hotfixes.

    Here is a Microsoft article on the subject, with links to KBs on slipstreaming. Googling the words "Slipstream" and "Windows" will get you lots of advice on the issue.

    Of course, you could just stick with Linux. Nothing wrong with that ;-) [/karmawhoring]

    --
    There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
  215. Best way to avoid Virii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont use norton, use mcafee, plain and simple, I've been using both for 10+ years and to tell you the truth (this is not opinion) norton has never caught a damn thing, those pc's always get infected, mcafee on the other hand when up to date catches every little sneeze the system makes, annoying but safe.

  216. Small Cheap router with firewall. by sparkeyjames · · Score: 1

    Get a small cheap router with firewall.
    With the popularity of wireless the wired routers are getting cheaper and cheaper. $35 and you can
    have a firewall what will help you avoid all those nasty worms and
    virus' until windows is all cosy with all the updates. I myself would NEVER connect
    a windows box to the internet directly, yes even with a normal telecom modem.

    sparkeyjames

  217. Disable remote DCOM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I usually disable remote DCOM using dcomcfg.exe or something like that found in the system directories (just search for dcom*.exe and it should come up). There's also a bunch of documents out there on hardening Windows that let you know what services you can turn off and still have a functional machine.

  218. Get OS patches on CD! by Game+Genie · · Score: 1
    Instead of downloading the patches from Microsoft, download iso's or purchase CD's from any of these fine sites:

    linuxiso.org

    bsdmall.com

    apple.com

    ...then kiss your security problems goodbye!

  219. Turn the Firewall On by a5cii · · Score: 1

    Turn the windows firewall on before you connect to the internet, it only stops incoming connections unfortunately so it will stop you from getting infected whilst you get the updates from the microsoft site. Turn the firewall off afterwards if you want to install another one.

    Other than allowing all programs outgoing access the firewall that comes with windows is really simple and easy to use

  220. Why is this question even being asked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a waste of time. It's obvious what needs to be done. How about getting the patches for blaster and sasser worms ahead of time. Download the manual updates for norton, download SP1a. Maybe even download a few other things that are handy to have around such as adaware.

    Burn to CD, and load your system.

    And now we know of one more person that doesn't use common sense.

  221. Well by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    So...how would you do it?"

    Leave network cable plugged in.
    Install WinXP from a CD that has been streamlined with SP1.
    Install Norton AV.
    Live Update.
    Windows Update.

    Oh, did I forget to tell you that all of my machines are behind a firewall?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  222. Firewall? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    Those first my first thoughts too. XP has a built in firewall, once the network adapter is installed you can active it. You dont have to get on the net first.

    What I do is keep the patches for blaster, et al on a usb keydrive. No need to even get the stock firewall up during the upgrade process.

    Also, correct me if I'm wrong but I believe XP has a mandrake-like 'check for updates now.'

    This is a bigger problem in 2K, but you activate IP filtering, which is essentially XP's firewall. ..after reviewing your link that's mostly what the SANS people are telling people. Enable firewall. This slashdot article sounds like more MS bitching (ive dont my fair share to be sure) than anything else.

  223. Use a NAT Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The client-side firewall product that you were using, Symantec's Norton Internet Security, contains well-known vulnerabilities. During the time that your XP box was connected and downloading NIS updates, your computer was vulnerable via that hole that I am aware of, and most likely others as well.

    It is extremely difficult to connect a Windows computer to the Internet using a public IP address without exposing several known vulnerabilities, unless you know all about disabling MS networking and how to configure NIS to shut off all the netbios stuff that it should shut off by default but doesn't so that things work in network neighborhood situations.

    Unless you're a person with IT admin skills and experience setting up and maintaining Internet-facing windows servers in a DMZ or with no external firewall protection, you'll stand little chance with an internet-facing windows consumer box. Spammers don't relay a hundred million spams a day through DSL-connected windows boxes by accident. Life becomes much easier with a $40 NAT box (linksys, dlink, old 486 running slackware and ipchains, whatever) between a windows PC and public IP space.

  224. OP: The 100% best answer by Glonoinha · · Score: 5, Informative

    Go to Best Buy and get a Linksys BEFSR41 router / firewall device.
    Plug your computer into the LAN side.
    Clone the MAC address of your computer.
    Change the password on the router to something other than 'admin'.
    Plug in your cablemodem into the WAN side.
    Enjoy your new worm/virus/trojan free existance.

    How many times do we need to spell it out??

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by Samhain138 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should the poor guy waste money in order to install WinXP?
      Doesn't Microsoft want people to install/update their product?
      And yes, they can do something: let pirated copies of WinXP update.
      Also, they should try this thing... What's its name... Oh, QA!
      I had the same problem: I am a linux user and I tried to install WinXP.
      After I installed it, I went to "windows update" right away.
      But while doing it, I got popups, I got "your computer will shut down in..." (I know, I know, shutdown -a, but still...).
      That's the most user-unfriendly experience I ever had with a computer/software.

    2. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

      I second this. Get a firmware firewall.
      I bought one *before* I got broadband, and it's positively scary to look at the number of attempted intrusions in the log.

      Spend the money for a Linksys and you won't be sorry. A side benefit is that you can hook up more than one computer to the internet. Keeps the kids off yours.

      Broadband without a firewall is irresponsible. Practice safe computing!

    3. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by ahknight · · Score: 1

      Why should the poor guy waste money in order to install WinXP?

      See, I thought he already wasted money obtaining XP.

    4. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by tiger99 · · Score: 2, Informative
      To add to that, if you don't want to buy a firewall, and you have an old PC handy, configure it with something like OpenBSD. For the minimal cost of a second network card, you have a firewall, in fact a much better one, because you can configure it any way you want. OK, it is larger than the Linksys, but you can dispense with the screen, keyboard and mouse (in fact you don't need a mouse anyway, it can be configured in text mode) once it is set up. The big advantage is that bug fixes will be available very quickly.

      But of course I will never install any M$ product again, ever, I have already wasted far too much time.....

      Even Zone Alarm (probably the best software firewall, don't use XP's own, it is useless) on any Windoze box with dialup shows an alarming number of serious intrusion attempts. No-one should ever be on-line without at least Zone Alarm, if they must go on line at all with Windoze. I do all my browsing and email in SuSE Linux now, my Windoze PC is only for a few programs that really need it, and they are being used less and less.

      The sad thing is that the vast majority of the public don't read Slashdot, or anything else for that matter, and so don't have a clue about the risks they are taking and the effect they are having on others. We are probably all agreed that spam from (usually) broadband-connected PCs with one or more trojans is a very real menace. It seems that in the UK (and likely the same in most places) 1 in 3 PCs is infected with at least one trojan, doing the work of the bulk spammers. I for one am sick of it, so I tend to tell everyone, at every opportunity, to get a properly configured firewall, and of course fully up to date anti-virus software. Even Linux users have to take these precautions, root access to a Linux box on broadband would be a hacker's delight.

      We may need laws to enforce safe use of the internet, if present trends continue. I had not checked my email for 4 days, when I did, there were about 50 spam emails showing an act that in the UK is illegal between male and female. I really do not want that kind of thing. I am quite sure that most of them had come via trojaned PCs. In fact under existing UK law, the owners could probably be prosecuted.

      The vast majority who leave their wireless networks unsecured are even more culpable. A spammer sitting in his car with a laptop will not be caught except by accident, one who operates illegally on-line with a direct connection might be.

    5. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a good firewall/router/wi-fi router? Does Linksys make a good model in this regard?

    6. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by raymo03 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I definitely agree to this. We bought a Linksys router to do windows 2000 installs. Before that, a new machine would get hit within 5 minutes by some blaster variant. Now we can get the machine completely set up before we switch it over to the university network.

    7. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by caseydk · · Score: 1

      Good call.

      I have a Netgear Router/Firewall purchased in late 2000 (updates have been installed) and I haven't had a problem yet. It cost $100 back then and I got another for $20 last summer.

      I even make a point of not allowing any XP box on my home network while any other Windows box is on it.

    8. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, pretty much any of the "firmware firewalls" (Linksys, Netgear, SMC, etc.) will do for protection. All do NAT, all have a firewall built in. Nowadays, they're even turned on by default (My first box, a Netgear, had a firewall but no rules!)

      The other features on these boxes are just gravy.

    9. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But seriously, the Linksys hardware isn't that expensive. While a slow PC would be more versatile and probably perform better, you're talking about losing some convenience.

      A Small PC would:
      Be Louder
      Use More Electricity (cost more)
      Generate More Heat
      Take Up More Space
      Probably Be an Eye-Sore
      Harder to use / configure for the less tech savvy

      Sure, if you're a geek and don't mind, then sure, go for it. But really, you can find a good Linksys Router / NAT for really cheap if you look in the sale ads. While it might not be as good, I think the convenience far outways the monetary costs and geek-factor.

    10. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 1

      Or, configure Linux box as a router. Plug in a second NIC. I used to put FreeBSD on 486's and early Pentium systems that I found in the garbage to be routers to babysit windows machines online. I've heard it's even easier to do in Linux, but have never tried.

      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
    11. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by boskone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe someone in the embedded business can answer this, but why don't the cable modems that we all have to buy or rent for broadband COME WITH basic TCP drop functionality for incoming connenctions. You could make it port 80 configurable from the inside or even require that it be configued via the USB port to be more secure. that way, the 90% of folks who ahve no need for incoming connenctions would be fine, and the other 10% of us could figure out what settings we'd like to use.

    12. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1

      showing an act that in the UK is illegal between male and female

      Forgive my ignorance, but which particular sexual act are you talking about? I live in the UK and I kind of thought a male and female of consensual age could do what they pleased in private.

    13. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I didn't say it was sexual. They were importing cigarettes with intent to resell.

    14. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by mtcrowe · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, even the shutdown -a trick doesn't work. Customers that I've dealt with have reported that both the RPC DCOM patch as well as the more recent LSASS patch have sometimes failed to install properly if the machine had been hit with the exploit code during the session. (It doesn't have to be _infected_, it's enough to have the service crashed.) They've even checked the Add/Remove Programs listing and the KB article is listed right there, but their machines keep suffering from reboots.

      In these cases, I've recommended good 'ol sneakernet: Burn the patches on CD, unplug the machine, reboot, install patches, plug back in, reboot. Pain in the rear, but it solved their problem.

    15. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by tiger99 · · Score: 1

      No they can not, and one particular act has resulted in a number of prosecutions, however for some years now it has been legal between men. I think that the particular piece of spam is illegal on other grounds also.

    16. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      As with any operating system, you should always ensure that it's as secure as it can be before connecting it onto any network, including the Internet. You obviously haven't done so here, since by enabling the built-in firewall in XP before connecting your ethernet cable/going online you would not have received any effects like this due to the blaster worm.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    17. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by racermd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps it's already been said in a post further down - A complete solution is to compile a custom-install CD of Windows XP that includes SP2, all current hotfixes, system drivers (better than MS-supplied ones, anyway), and any other extras you can think of. Heck, this works with DVD+/-R discs so you'll have more than enough space for those really big programs (like MS Office). Details on how to do this are all over the internet, just use Google to find it. I update my install CDs/DVDs every month. In fact, I have a CD for simple, bare installs and a DVD for more complete installs complete with applications. What about the old CD/DVD every month? I archive them and use them as a starting point if I ever have a complete loss of my systems. (Knocking on wood) Even if you only go so far as to patch up to SP2, you should patched well enough to get online and get the rest of the updates in a much more reasonable time.

      Of course, this is no guarantee of true network security. For that, you'll need something between the internet source (cable modem, DSL adapter, carrier pigeon, etc.) configured appropriately to filter the traffic.

      What works for me is a Netgear RT311 - a 1 WAN, 1 LAN, SPI NAT router (with the latest firmware update) - and the custom CD mentioned above. I've *never* gotten a virus during a standard Windows XP install from just being connected to the network behind the router. I can leave an unpatched system up for weeks at a time and never see a problem, not that I ever really do that. The fact that I *can* do it is a very secure feeling, indeed. And the fact that I'm, at most, 1 month from being completely up-to-date on my own systems at any given install makes the update process that much quicker and safer.

      The Windows XP built-in firewall is a complete joke, as mentioned before. It's not that it doesn't work - it does. It's just that it's not a very efficient solution. Enable it on a lower-powered system, and you're going to be using almost all of your CPU time just analyzing packets of data. Besides, you really want to prevent the traffic from getting to your system in the first place, which is why I can't stand using ZoneAlarm or any other software-based firewall as a primary point of defense. It should be used as a last-resort solution or in cases where you won't have a physical firewall to protect your computer (a roaming laptop is a great example). Given a lack of other, more effective blocking, software firewalls should be a *requirement*. But it should be complementary to a proper firewall whenever possible.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    18. Re:OP: The 100% best answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% agree, always have a hardware router/firewall in front of your machine before connecting to the Internet.

      And note: if you are having broadband installed by a broadband company morlock, they will require that you don't have said router connected while they do their work. Be sure to have a software firewall running during the brief period between morlock making the connection and morlock exiting your front door. I did, and in that space of two minutes or less I was scanned by korean machines many times.

      And note: even with a really great router/firewall in front of you, a software firewall is still a good idea. I've had ZoneAlarm, for example, alert me to spy/adware "phoning home" a number of times. A router/firewall won't do that for you, at least not in real time.

  225. Rule 1 for Windows by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Windows is a fine system as long as you follow one basic rule. Never connect it, even by sneakernet, to any untrusted machine. If you plug Windows into the Internet then it can, and probably will, be compromised. Windows is fine for running Office or playing games but it can never be secure. This is my experience of years as a programmer, hacker, admin, and security guy.

    But then.. any system can be penetrated. It just depends how far those trying are willing to go and risk as to if they can do so. Windows is just easier than most systems. :)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  226. Can you say "Firewall?" by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1

    You can get a residential broadband router with NAT for less than $50. These do some limited firewall-like filtering as well. Or put a second NIC in and setup your Linux box to do the same (or just use your Linux box as a proxy). All you really need to start with is a NAT boundry with no inbound routing or port forwarding to the new PC. This will keep-out the worms until you finish patching. Without a firewall or NAT, a fresh PC is typically compromised within 15 minutes.

    Go to WindowsUpdate FIRST and nowhere else until all your Windows and Internet Explorer service packs and patches are installed. Then install and update your antivirus. Follow this with a personal firewall (at least the free version of ZoneAlarm). Proceed from there. Just be very careful to not mistype the URL for any of these trusted websites, or you might get an unpleasant surprise.

    As noted elsewhere, Microsoft has an update CD but it's not up-to-date, and it seems to take forever to arrive. Ordered mine in Feb, received it in April, and it was only updated through Oct of last year. Since then there's been more than 30MB of new patches. There are about a dozen projects on the web to help you make your own complete and up-to-date patch CD, or even Windows install CD. I don't know how good/reliable/trustworthy these projects are because I use network-based commercial tools at my shop, but they seem to be making some people happy.

    Microsoft recommends you disable so-called "personal firewall" software on the PC you are updating. I find that with the right settings, this is unneccessary. But in any event, a hardware-based firewall or simple residential router/NAT device will not interfere in anyway with WindowsUpdate (unless you want it to).

    As silly as it might sound, I keep a cheap router in the back of my car at all times. I can't tell you how often I've had family, friends and clients with completely-trashed machines that need rebuilding and don't have a firewall. I used to try to maintain a CD of all the service packs and patches for Win98 through XP, but it took too much effort to maintain. The router is easier and cheaper in the long-run. It also looks nice sitting back there next to my propeller-beanie.
    --
    --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
  227. Really that bad? by dangerz · · Score: 1

    Ok honestly, is it really that bad installing windows that you get hit that quick?

    I run Slackware mainly on my laptop, but on my desktop I have Windows XP. I have never had any problems installing windows, nor have I had any issue with doing it on anyone else's computer. I've gotten full installs, with updates and never had any kind of virus. I also use AntiVir, which is a free windows antivirus. That's usually one of the first things that goes on.

    Am I lucky, or is it seriously that large of a problem? If it was, I'd imagine Microsoft would have quite the issue with new users installing windows. Not everyone is a techie that knows how to install it without getting hit by virii.

    --
    The greatest experience we can have is the mysterious.
    - Albert Einstein
  228. I've never gotten a virus or a worm by rfc1394 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a linksys wireless router between my DSL modem and my computers. I've gotten malware and spyware on my main computer (I found out later when I ran a checking program) but never got a virus or a worm. When I later installed Apache locally on a Win 98 machine and put in a .hosts file with a list of all the adware companies and their servers routed back to localhost, (which causes the local copy of Apache to try to serve them and report no such page) it also stopped almost all popups and a lot of in-line ads.

    --
    The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    1. Re:I've never gotten a virus or a worm by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      First thing I do when I install XP is to snag the hosts file from someonewhocares.org, since I've used that, neither ad-aware nor spybot have detected one bit of spyware.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:I've never gotten a virus or a worm by rfc1394 · · Score: 1
      First thing I do when I install XP is to snag the hosts file from someonewhocares.org, since I've used that, neither ad-aware nor spybot have detected one bit of spyware.
      I agree, that's what I did. But there's one problem. If you don't also run a local webserver or have one on wherever the hostname is pointed to for those ad servers and malware servers, in some cases some web sites will not open. Slashdot is one, for some reason if it can't resolve the address of the banner ad, the page becomes the banner address instead of the actual address and the page won't load. But if you run a local webserver (like Universal Server that runs Apache, PHP and MYSQL on a Windows machine (even Windows 98) the address does resolve, is returned bad and the web pages then load correctly, just without the popups.
      --
      The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    3. Re:I've never gotten a virus or a worm by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      So slashdot won't load if one uses the hosts file from someonewhocares.org... I told you I use the hosts file from that site. I'm telling you this ON /.

      See the problem?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  229. Visa by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Funny
    • Windows XP Pro Original - US$ 200
    • Follow the Microsoft Instructions - US$ 0
    • Apply recommended patches by microsoft using microsoft recommended way - US$ 0
    • ...
    • Getting worms, viruses, and trojans even after all of this work: priceless
  230. Two simple options to avoid the problem by davecason · · Score: 1

    1. Buy and use an internet router. 2. Go into your network settings for your network card, find TCP/IP and open up its properties. Once there, select "Advanced" then "Options" then select TCP/IP filtering. Then set port 80 as the only allowed port. Then connect to the internet and update your computer. Rinse, repeat... etc. until fully up to date, then remove or adjust your filters accordingly.

  231. simple solution by shaitand · · Score: 1

    do the install from behind a linux firewall. Windows is very insecure in every fashion you can come up with.

    Linux is not, so count on linux for your security if you really have to do an XP install.

  232. Umm... by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

    Start to pull down Service Pack One; per Microsoft's instructions, all firewalls are turned off.

    Microsoft says that as a CYA. I doubt MS's firewall or Norton's would block windows update. Do NOT turn the firewalls off.

  233. Shutdown -a by tvjames · · Score: 0

    shutdown -a do that every time

    --
    Sig: ...
  234. Even if it gets attacked, it's fixable. by gelfling · · Score: 1

    You're best bet is to install as normal connected. After the installation stabilizes download ZA, AVAST and Spybot.

    Install ZA then install and RUN Avast and Spybot. If you have problems during these steps you can disconnect from the cable modem. If you have already been attacked these tools will find them.

    Configure both Avast and Spybot with all the real time blocker tools you need and set Avast resident scanners to HIGH or, Custom, depending on your circumstances. Set both resident Spybot scanners to ON.

    Hookup your cable modem. Reboot, reacquire your IP address and you are done.

    I have done this numerous time w/o problems. If the machine gets infected during this time then the tools find it and remove it.

  235. Easy by Jayso · · Score: 1

    The easiest way I have done it is to do an install of windows on a network that is firewalled by a linux box. Never had a problem of viruses on install.

  236. Uh.. by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

    Leave the firewall turned ON, perhaps? Norton's stuff sucks, better to not install it at all if you want your machine to run well. Their stuff is bloated...VERY bloated. Use AVG for antivirus if you want one that small and free. Leave the XP firewall on and have fun! It's really not that difficult.

    --
    Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
    http://www.workorspoon.com
  237. I wrote an article on this... by TallCool1 · · Score: 1

    "XP-Out-of-the-Box" http://www.ameritech.net/users/mpr_support/XP_Box. html It works for me...

  238. tips by bugmenot · · Score: 1

    Get SP1 and Microsofts RPC vulnerability patch ahead of time and have them ready on CD. My ISP does a poor job controlling recent RPC exploiting viruses, and I will get hit too unless I run the patch locally first.

    --
    This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
  239. Windows IS the virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Dont install it to begin with"

    Take it anyway you want, but as a support of Free Software, I eat my own dogfood. I DONT USE MS software, not even the OS.

  240. Use unattended install with hotfixes and qchain. by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    You can use an unattended install with hotfixes. Qchain.exe is a file that automatically installs the hotfixes in the correct order. The article mentions where to download qchain.exe.

  241. Umm Yes by thebdj · · Score: 1

    The answer to this question is obviously yes. I mean I cannot count the number of times I have installed and updated Windows from virus recoveries and from clean builds and never get a virus before securing the PC is complete. It sounds to me like you may be missing a critical step. I mean please tell me you are reformatting on the install to. Otherwise why both to install the second time. The virus would still be sitting around there somewhere waiting.

    There is really no excuse for you to have a virus/worm that quick unless you are an incompetent windows user. Of course you could be failing to mention the virus filled email you opened, or the pr0n site you were visiting during your updates. Seriously man, unless you blatantly go look for a virus/worm then you should not get one before you get patched and updated. BTW, windows firewall a la SP1 is crap and so is Symantec/Norton's. Seriously get yourself a Hardware firewall and then throw in Zone Alarm for good measure. Any good firewall should still let you successfully patch windows without having to turn it off.

    I love linux and all, but dude it sounds like you should come and take a breath. Windows may be the devil, but Linux (at this point) can only take the geeks so far.

    --
    "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
  242. Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about downloading updates and burning them to a CD?

  243. Bad Situation by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1

    I agree, it's a terrible situation. I'm a Windows fan but this is not one of the times to defend Microsoft's software - the XP installation problem stinks. You simply can't follow their instructions and install XP without getting hit by an RPC worm. What I'd recommend is to either leave the firewall on while installing the patch, or download the network install of SP1 (this is a full installer that you can use offline), the RPC fix, and the LSASS fix, and install them with the network unplugged.

    Another option is to order the security update CD from Microsoft - they'll send this to any Windows user for free.

    As many have suggested, you can install behind a router. Not an ideal solution but it does the job. I hate NAT, and I hate recommending that people use it for security. NAT is a step backwards.

    IT professionals can slipstream SP2 onto an installation CD once that comes out. It's due within a month or two. SP2 includes all current security patches and the new firewall, which is on by default. The new firewall also loads before TCP/IP, so there's no window of vulnerability during startup.

    1. Re:Bad Situation by FullCircle · · Score: 1

      How is NAT a step backwards?

      Not flaming, if your insecure systems are mostly invisible behind NAT and a firewall, it sounds like a good thing. One or two more secured hops to the system sure can't hurt until you have it locked down.

      Luckily, sometimes the easy way is the best way.

      --
      If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
    2. Re:Bad Situation by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1

      They can be invisible behind a firewall and still have real IP addresses. NAT isn't a real solution to anything. The correct solution to the IP shortage is IPv6, and the correct solution to "hard outside, soft inside" security is a combination of firewalling and keeping internal machines patched.

      The Internet was supposed to connect everything to everything. Instead we have millions of unreachable hosts, which make it a real pain to use any application that requires direct connections. NAT is a step backwards and it creates more problems than it solves.

  244. To-do list for new XP install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have copies of the following programs on CD.
    SafeXP
    http://theorica.click-now.net/safexp. htm
    XP-Antispy
    http://www.xp-antispy.org/
    XPY
    http://xpy.sourceforge.net/

    With those three, you can disable most pesky services that XP runs that can put you at risk.
    I used to swear by the 3 big GRC.COM utilities, but the above handle dcom, uPNP, and windows messenger already.

    Also, have SP1, and the recent patches on CD ready to apply.
    Sasser
    http://www.microsoft.com/technet/s ecurity/bulletin /MS04-011.mspx
    Blaster
    http://www.microsoft.com/ technet/security/bulletin /MS03-039.mspx

    And you need a good firewall. Don't think of using none. And a good free software one will do you good.
    http://smb.sygate.com/products/spf_standard .htm

  245. I had the same problem with XP two years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the same problem with XP two years ago with UPNP. I was hit with security problems before I could update the machine. Since Microsoft essentially requires network access to authorize the machine and get security patches, this seems like very bad design. Also, I think Microsoft charges for the security CDs.

    Imagine buying a car, and once you get it home, being told that you need to patch it within a day, and the patch will either cost you money to send, or put you at risk.

    1. Re:I had the same problem with XP two years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I checked one of the links above, and found that the security CD is currently free. I don't believe it always was, but at least you can get it free now. You just have to twiddle your thumbs for a few weeks (5 or 6?) while Microsoft sends you out the disk so you can safely boot up your machine :):)

      Wouldn't it make more sense to offer the disk at the point of purchase for free? That is essentially what they do with a recall when a product is defective. Of course, Microsoft is still requiring the customer to patch the product themselves instead of making an error free version of Windows, but at least it would be approaching normal business practices..

  246. simple solution to simple problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) acquire a simple p100 (most people have similar already)
    2) install smoothwall on the p100
    3) install xp behind the firewall

    No other way.

  247. Personally... by baximus · · Score: 1

    Ona different machine, go find the "redist" version of SP1 (SP1a actually) and burn the executable to CD.

    Or better yet, go visit AutoPatcher.com and download the latest one of those, including all the newest post-SP1 patches.

  248. Check your hardware! by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    Spontaneous power downs and reboots (if they are really spontaneous, i.e. no sign that Windows knows it is going to reboot) are my number 1 sign of hardware problems. Get a motherboard monitoring program to watch the heat and PS readings. Get a memory testing program and check your memory. See if you can get a HDD diagnostic program from your HDD manufacturer.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  249. Am I the luckiest person on earth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've run 98 and XP for about 4-5 years now, never updated anything except IE, and ran a firewall for about 6 months sometime in that period.

    Other than that, nothing. I guess I've been vulnerable this entire time, through all these major news story worms and the like. And I can recall only ONCE that I've gotten a virus/worm that just totally screwed my system. WTH? This article makes it sound as though it will bring your computer to it's knees in a matter of minutes, yet I've done nothing as far as security goes and I've been running great for YEARS. Am I just not a good target? Am I lucky? What gives? I don't keep anything on my system that is critical without backup, which explains why I don't really care about these things, but come on, I think some people are interpeting every single unexplained attempt at connecting is a death threat to thier system.

    Of course, I say all this and I'll get hit tomorrow, but the sad thing is, is that I want a reason to do a fresh install so I can ghost the drive with xp and my essentials installed (hell, why not even a SP or 2 :) and have newly installed system at the mere thought of a virus. I back up my media anyway, and I put the most important stuff on external drives at it is (which stay unplugged while not in use. I don't see why more people don't do this, unless your one of those types that upgrade every week, it seems the most logical way to do things.

  250. Windows Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in their right mind gives a shit about Windows? Windows isn't even an operating system, it is a toy, meant to teach children how to use computer peripherals. That is all it is worth.

    Who cares about Windows? Piss on Windows... and Microsoft. I wish they would just die already and leave the rest of us to use Linux - a real operating system. I love Windows virii and worms... it shows how vulnerable that so-called OS is. I wish people would write more trouble making programs for Microsoft to deal with.

  251. Easy... by pmsyyz · · Score: 1

    Go to http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/CurrentD L.aspx

    Select OS, get list of security updates, download, burn to cd, installed patches before connecting new OS install to network.

    --
    Phillip
  252. I'd have to say... by electrofreak · · Score: 0

    ...that I have never installed a firewall on my system because I don't need it. Never ahd any problems getting updates before a virus hits, and never had any problems with virus on my system ever. I also have Road Runner, the only difference is, I'm on a LAN. Hook the system up by the switch, have the cable modem hooked up to the router, router up to the hub or switch, and wow, a firewall that is nearly impossible to break through. If you are using Windows as the router, big mistake there. Most of these viruses/worms that you speak of are attacks of windows machines. And yes, my webserver is always getting hits by worms, usually by other RR IP addresses. So, these worms to crawl RR, but if you are behind a routers, there is nothing the worm can infect on the router. You are safe that way.

    --
    I need a sig.
  253. Infected in under 15 mins by dr_skipper · · Score: 1

    I was installing XP Pro TODAY, and was infected in under 15 mins, blaster. So I figured ok, no problem, reformat/reinstall and this time without network connectivity until AFTER the install is done and I've enabled the software firewall on the interface.

    GUESS WHAT? I was infected, even WITH THE MS FIREWALL ENABLED!! Not with blaster, I don't know what it was. But my browser went nuts, and started opening all sorts of porn. All I did was go to windows update, and install SP1. Shortly after rebooting and trying to DL the next thousand MS patches, I was infected with pr0n worm.. WTF?

    Anyhow, the ONLY way I know of to do this without getting WORMED is using a natting HW Firewall. The MS firewall must drop its pants at some point.

    Good luck.

    1. Re:Infected in under 15 mins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey... shit for brains... the worm isn't the problem. Installing Windows is the problem. Any moron who installs any Mircosoft software on their computer deserves to be attacked and hacked.

  254. Use a NAT/hardware firewall. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Put the winbox on a non-routable IP (10/8, 192.168/16, etc...) with NO port forwarding. Simple enough to do in IPtables or FreeBSD's ipfw.

    Do NOT count on stupid software firewalls (BlackICE, Norton Internet Firewall, etc...) as putting a firewall on the machine its supposed to protect is like wearing a bulletproof vest on the inside.

  255. Funny, I've never had that happen and I install... by Assmasher · · Score: 1

    ...XP Pro often (sadly) on new machines. Did it on a new FTP machine the other day which was connected straight to our unprotected T1. I didn't have the problems this guy is reporting, lol.

    In any case, you simply install XP while not connected to your broadband service, you install a software or hardware firewall (zonealarm for example) and then connect and update, how hard is that?

    --
    Loading...
  256. Spend $41.99. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproductdesc.asp?desc ription=33-122-008&DEPA=5

  257. Use autoinstall w/o being plugged into a network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Start reading- http://unattended.msfn.org/

    There's a link to a forum thread which lists EVERY required update patch from MS & the URL to download each one directly.

    There are also some premade scripts in the forum for building quite up to date installations of XP, by burning your custom install cd with all the patch updates on it. The installation would autopatch without having to be connected to a network.

  258. Well...I'd by a router. by craenor · · Score: 1
    Not an expensive router. Just a *shrug* $50.00 linksys router with a hardware firewall.

    Problem pretty much solved.

    If you want though, before you ever plug in the network cable, you can:
    1. Click Start
    2. Right-click My Computer
    3. Click Manage
    4. Click Applications and Services
    5. Double-click Services
    6. Scroll down to Remote Procedure Call (RPC) - the first listing, not the second
    7. Click on Recovery
    8. Change the first, second and subsequent failure to Take no Action

    9. Craenor
  259. jeez, people just look by geekoid · · Score: 1

    go to MSs site
    Order the patch CD
    WHen you get the patch CD, intall the OS, sans connection
    Update the system with the updateCD
    reboot.
    reconnecect.

    I would wager you could probably get one from any mom and pop shop for just a couple of bucks.

    If you deal with intalling OSes, you should already have a copy.

    It is not brain surgery.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  260. I'm sure it's been suggested, but... by penginkun · · Score: 1

    Download SP1 and as many critical updates as you can, then burn them to a CD. Do this on a Linux box or a Mac, or on a known-safe Windows PC. Install everything, including SP1 and all critical updates. THEN get online. Alternatively, you could also put the PC behind a hardware firewall, such as a router, and then try the updates. Then install BlackIce or Panda and let the script kiddies do their worst.

  261. HARDWARE FIREWALL! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    So...how would you do it?"

    It's been said before, and I'll say iot again because it bear repeating:

    Use a hardware firewall!

    There is no excuse not to. You've obviously got the know-how to operate a $10 Linksys router/firewall. Plug one in and with the default configuration you can install at your leisure. Honestly, whenever I hear someone complain "I can't install XP on a machine plugged directly into a cable modem without getting 0wnz0rd", it sounds like someone complaining that their wallet gets stolen every time they leave it on the roof of their car in the supermarket parking lot!

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    1. Re:HARDWARE FIREWALL! by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      "... it sounds like someone complaining that their wallet gets stolen every time they leave it on the roof of their car in the supermarket parking lot!" - If one wants to continue that analogy, you might represent the Microsoft vehicle as one that (by default) has all windows, the sunroof, and the hood open to the world by default.

  262. exactly by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I have has exactly 1 virus, and it was on DOS 3.
    I have a linksys switch, no anti virus protects. I don't run outlook, and only run IE when I have to, whch is hardly ever anymore.

    I do scan my system every couple of weeks, but I can't stand anti-virus software that is always on. You can coult on it to muck something up.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  263. The perfect solution, but there are 4 steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the perfect solution to the problem:

    Step 1. Throw Windows OS in the trash,
    Step 2. Install Linux,
    Step 3. Learn how to use Linux,
    Step 4. Kiss all your problems goodbye

  264. Go to Winhelpline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At www.winhelpline.info you can download an installer for all the critical updates. It's great.

  265. How to avoid infection while installing Windows by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

    It's a two-step process:

    1. Get a hardware router/switch. Make sure it does not, I repeat not, support Universal Plug-and-Play. You do not want arbitrary applications able to manipulate your firewall.
    2. Install and update Windows as normal. The firewall will prevent anyone outside from initiating connections to your machine. All you have to worry about is websites you visit and e-mails you read before you finish the security-update process and get your anti-virus and anti-malware software and software firewall (to protect the rest of the world from you) up and running.
    Hardware routers of this sort run for well under $100 and are a lot easier to deal with than the convolutions needed if they aren't there.
  266. Burn it by y00nix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would follow the recommendation of our friends at thebroken.org and burn your computer from the inside out.

  267. Urrr. Internet Connection Firewall? by rips123 · · Score: 1
    Are people forgetting that Internet Connection Firewall on WinXP will happily ignore traffic to all those 'bad' ports that worms use? (RPC, SMB, etc..)

    Seems fairly straight-forward to me. Turn it on before you connect to the Internet...

    Why did this make it to slashdot and furthermore, why hasn't anyone else suggested this?

  268. can you say netfilter by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1
    Set up netfilter on your linux machine, and NAT through it to the internet. I have run this for several years, and have not had an issue with worms on Win 2000 or XP... or Linux (but that goes without saying!).

    I am not sure why he need to disable the firewalls he has installed anyway. Most give a way to open up the machine to specific sites when needed.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  269. whats the Deal? by sydres · · Score: 1

    I got Roadrunner and configured it myself with Linux did not even need to touch windows after all it is just a dhcp host at the modem through in an el cheapo router (linksys here) set up dhcp and firewall and anything that touches the network can get on

  270. Avoid Viruses by JerryLs · · Score: 1

    I have dial up, but if I don't turn on WinXP's firewall before I log on, I get hit too. I say use xp's firewall and forget Norton until you're safely online.

    --
    Ad Astra Per Asper
    1. Re:Avoid Viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're using a Windows OS, there is no such thing as "safely online".

      When will you idiots pull your heads out of your asses and stop using Microsoft products? Microsoft doesn't care one little bit about your computer or your software. Microsoft cares about one thing, and only one thing - money. And, that will be their eventual downfall... and yours.

  271. download the service packs and updates in advance by tisme · · Score: 1

    I have had this happen to myself one time as well. The computer was compromised before I was able to get the security updates from Windows Update.

    What you need to do (if you want Windows XP to work) is to download the service packs and security updates in advance and install them before connecting your network. Install firewall/anti-virus software and then turn on your network. Windows XP SP2 will be out soon on CD-ROM which should make things easier (for a few days/weeks at least).

  272. Ignore the recommendations by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Turn on the XP firewall before going online or get a $20 NAT. Either will protect you, except the XP firewall against IPv6 traffic, but no worms I know of support IPv6.

    And forget Norton/Symantec, at least for now. Their virus scanner is a big performance hit, so much that you'll feel the difference on any computer. It has historically been a cause of many problems, like system freezes scanning some compressed exes, though I haven't experienced any with recent versions. With good practices alone you will probably never get a worm or virus.

  273. 80 buck router or a linux firewall by Revek · · Score: 1

    as simple as that

  274. Are you serious? by FullCircle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So I should reinstall my OS and depend on some third party tool to remove crap installed on it?

    What you are saying is that it is impossible to install Windows cleanly?

    Try using a firewall/router instead.

    If you can't afford a hardware router you can't afford Windows. Add $50+ to the TCO of Windows.

    Or if you can't afford that, use another free OS, such as any BSD or Linux.

    --
    If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
  275. Spend $40 and get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a broadband router. What's the big deal?

  276. Re:No hardware firewalls for dialup by Revek · · Score: 1

    hell a pentium 120 or 486 can act as a dialup router with no problem. I use mine as trot line wieghts but if you have one laying around it will install a thin version of slackware. Install webmin use it to setup your firewall and you dialup. It works fine I have done it for buisness's to run their whole office off of a dialup. Slow but it works.

  277. Re:Have to buy broadband first by Sepodati · · Score: 1

    I've actually been looking for something like this for my parents who don't have broadband available, but would like wireless access.

    Solution is a wireless access point / router that has a serial port to connect an external modem to. The router should support "dial-up on demand" over the serial connection.

    The SMC7004AWBR was one I found that has this feature ($10.00 on ebay) with a cheap external serial modem ($15.00 on froogle), I can have them set up quite cheaply. Now I just have to convince my mother to actually purchase a computer! :)

    Thanks for your comment, which lead me to the right google search terms to use!!

    ---John Holmes...

  278. Simple by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

    I work in tech support for a major manufacturer. We just have the user enable XP's firewall before the network cable is ever plugged in. This wasn't decided on a whim, but from experience.
    Frankly, we don't care what Symantec or Microsoft say.
    Oh, and let me assure you of how much I just love it when someone calls back because the previous agent neglected to mention the necessity of enabling the firewall immediately after a reinstall. Can you believe they tell me I can't strangle co-workers?

  279. How to avoid virii/worms/trojans/etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install Linux :)

    Actually, virii/worms/trojans/etc. aren't the problem. The problem is that too many stupid people are still using Windows - an OS that is really easy to screw up.

    1. Re:How to avoid virii/worms/trojans/etc. by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

      Yeah but what if all he wants to do is play Halo?

  280. Hmm... by FullCircle · · Score: 1

    Cool solution!

    Now that I know how to cover up the SYMPTOM of the infection, I can just ignore that I have a virus on my fresh new install of Windows!

    I agree, get the router. It isn't optional these days.

    --
    If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
    1. Re:Hmm... by craenor · · Score: 1

      Yes...but covering up the symptom allows you to stay online long enough to update windows, update your virus protection and clean the virus off the computer. But then, you knew that...you were just being a smart-ass. I can't blame you.

  281. If the pros can't avoid virus, how can the masses? by webweave · · Score: 1

    Oh yea, sure just use a linux firewall?
    Or the suggestion that reads like a NASA space launch check list.

    How about a solution that works.

    1. Take Windows install disk out of package.
    2. Grasp disk firmly.
    3. With malicious forethought and intention strike disk against solid object.
    4. Inspect bits, ensuring positively that no viruses will be present at install time.
    5. Insert favorite *nix boot disk in infected computer, format drive and continue install.

    "There are no Windows experts, they all signed NDAs."

  282. Suggestions: by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    While I do think that this whole story is a troll, I'll give some suggestions:

    1. Firewall on. Yes. The Windows one. No matter what the directions say. It's not perfect, but it's better than nothing. (ZoneAlarm or BlackIce are better. McAfee or Norton are barely acceptable.)

    2. Hardware firewall. Amazon.com has a wireless router for $16 after rebates. Buy two.

    3. Download the various updates (SP1 'net install' and the various Knowledge Base downloads to patch against specific virus holes,) and burn them on a CD. Install these before you turn on the internet connection.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  283. gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    setup a private network.

  284. Re:Use a firewall or a cd burner, or both by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    IS it just me or d oes windows-help.net suck major donkey balls now that infini-sopurce isn't managing it anymore?

    I know this is off topic but i went there a couple weeks ago to find an article i viewed over 2 years before and it seams that someone took a well organized site with tones of information about most of the windows product and turned it into a crap looking shill for windows xp that doesn't apear to even have as much info about xp as i remeber the regular site having.

    i know this is off topic but you link pointed to it and it has me wondering if anyone else thinks as little about it now as i do. I guess you can't give me watter and pass it off as wine unless you a certan type of person.

  285. Why would you turn off the firewall? by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    Really.

    Why?

  286. A little of topic but... by seanismdotcom · · Score: 1

    When you guys update off the Windows Update do you install ALL of the updates or only some of them? I had the impression that having all of them sorta bogs down the computer but I was never sure. Tips for which ones to install and which not to are appreciated. THANKS!

  287. This is exactly how to do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. Pull machine off net
    2. Install box
    3. Configure TCP/IP and enable windows firewall
    4. Plug in network cable
    5. Windows update
    6. Repeat windows update

    Job done.

    1. Re:This is exactly how to do it. by phasm42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mod parent up. I don't understand why this guy simply didn't use the XP firewall and be done with it. It would've worked better, and he wouldn't have had to install Norton BS. Plus, in step 11 HE TURNS ALL FIREWALLS OFF. Of course he's getting infected. I don't think many people have pointed that out, but he got infected because he turned off the damn firewall like an idiot. Reading MS's line on the subject: here, they say to turn off ANTIVIRUS, not firewall. So he probably turned off all of NISP, not just the AV portion.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  288. The simplest way... by BananaJr6000 · · Score: 1

    ...is to turn on the firewall (excuse me, ICF.)

    The average home user thinks NAT is a no-see-um.
    The average user plugs the computer into the cable modem. Unless Sparky at Best Buy told them they needed a "Web Router" or a "Broadband Router" and they have the neighborhood geek kid come over and install it.
    The average user doesn't know their IP address, gateway, or DNS server. They may have trouble figuring it out even when given instructions over the phone.

    KISS!!!
    -- Alive and kicking in a VM

  289. YHGTBFK... by csk_1975 · · Score: 1

    A hardware firewall inspects packets and determines whether they should be routed from one physical (hardware) interface to another physical (hardware) interface.

    A software firewall inspects packets and determines whether the packet should be passed between different layers of the TCP/IP stack (software) on a single machine.

    This isn't simply a matter of semantics. Just because hardware firewalls run software doesn't make them software firewalls. duh.

  290. We have to get creative here. by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Here are some ideas:

    1) Hide behind a NAT router - Install windows disconnected from networks. Find someone with DSL and a NAT router. Intall all the patches from the safety of their home network.

    2) Before installing windows, format the disk to have a FAT partition. Boot Knoppix Linux from a CD. get on the internet and download the patches to the FAT partion. Boot Windows - install patches.

    --

    Religion is the main cause of atheism.

  291. Do it right: Use hardware... by KC7GR · · Score: 2, Informative

    Use a hardware firewall, or a decent router with a firewall built in, instead of depending on something that's software-based. That way, the nasties are stopped before they even get to your computer.

    I've not had personal experience with them, but others I've spoken with have had good luck with Linksys and D-Link. For my part, I've always depended on our Watchguard Firebox II to handle things.

    Granted, such a unit is well beyond the cost range of most home setups (unless you get a phenomenal deal on it used, as I did). However, before I had the Firebox, I was part of the Beta testing team for the Zyxel 'Prestige 312' combo dual-Ethernet router/firewall. The 312 has been discontinued for some time now, but it performed like a champ for me.

    If I were going to pick another unit today, I would look at Zyxel's ZyWall 100 series, or something similar. They're quite a bit less expensive than Watchguard's products, and I see no reason they shouldn't work just as well.

    If the 100's a little too costly for you, the entire ZyWall series comes in a variety of sizes from 1 on up. The number usually designates the number of VPN connections the unit allows.

    If you're a DIY'er, you can, of course, just get hold of a spare PC, stick a couple of NICs in it, load it up with FreeBSD or some such, and turn it into a router/firewall.

    The bottom line is that I don't believe any purely software-based firewall can ever be as secure as one that's hardware-based, and dedicated to the purpose of just being a firewall. I certainly don't trust Uncle Bill or Symantec to do it right (witness the problems you've already had).

    Happy hunting.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:Do it right: Use hardware... by majland · · Score: 1

      >If I were going to pick another unit today,
      >I would look at Zyxel's ZyWall 100 series

      Less can do it for a home setup (i.e zywall2).

      I have been using zyxel zywalls since the now discontinued zywall10 was the news. Right now I run a network with about 15 zywalls spread arround the globe. Most in Denmark and the farest away is in Japan.

      The reason for hardware firewall's and vpn access was simple that we at that time still used NT 4.0 and many was dualbooting different OS's.

      We choose the zyxel zywall's since we have been a long time user of zyxel modems, isdn adapters and routers.

    2. Re:Do it right: Use hardware... by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      >Use a hardware firewall, or a decent router with a firewall built in, instead of depending on something that's software-based.

      A hardware firewall?
      That is just a box with a microcontroller that runs a piece of software!

      It will be fun when one of these develops a vulnerability and everybody has to update "the hardware"...

  292. per Microsoft's Instructions by Duc+de+Montebello · · Score: 1

    Just read the instructions for service pack one, and I cannot find any mention of the phrase: "turn off all firewalls"

    A fine troll couldn't understand why soemone would have so many problems with such a simple activity.

    --
    "If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes should fall like a house of cards. Checkmate." - Zapp Brannigan
  293. what about... by KeelSpawn · · Score: 1

    trying zonealarm?

    --
    http://www.palmzone.net
  294. 30 dollar linksys router.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a router, theyre cheap. Run NAT.
    Set up the computer behind it.
    Install patches.

    Seems a bit of a no-brainer to me...

  295. Norton AV updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did anyone think to download the norton av updates first, then install before you connect to the net???

    1. Re:Norton AV updates by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      But how can you... Umm... Wuh... *Shakes head*

    2. Re:Norton AV updates by cruachan · · Score: 1

      Presumaby you intall XP, then install the anti-virus software from disk. Then you log onto symantec and download the update file using another machine, copy the update onto the install machine and apply.

      Another solution with a spare machine would be to download a free firewall and appy that first.

  296. *sigh* by NerveGas · · Score: 1


    Why, oh why are people who can't even think to use a firewall allowed to submit questions to "Ask Slashdot?"

    It doesn't even have to be that fancy of a firewall. Shoot, even just being behind a NAT will protect you sufficiently from incoming attacks that you should be able to update the machine without being exploited - and that's not even a firewall, that's just routing!

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  297. ...or you could profit by it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Demand compensatory payments from your ISP for damages caused by a service they provide... ...like making lemons into Apple Cider

  298. You sir, are correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is exactly what popped into my head the instant I read the article. I couldn't believe how stupid of question that moron asked... then I read the comments. People are suggesting shit like: "install the updates in WINE first" and other totally retarded stuff. Slashdot fucking blows man.

  299. Hardware Firewall Appliance, not just builtin by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative
    Some of the people replying to this message seem to think you're talking about XP's built-in firewall features. While they may be nice, a cheap hardware NAT firewall is just about a necessity for installing Windows safely, because you need to reduce the rate of attacks until you can get all the updates installed, which might include firewall updates.

    NAT is an evil abomination that breaks the Internet's end-to-end model, but for machines that will really never receive incoming connections (VOIP, games, IM, etc. as well as web servers), it's cheap insurance, and for machines that aren't ready to connect to the net, like unpatched Windows, it's pretty much essential. And once you've got your machine patched, you can then open up whatever ports you want on your firewall, if it's bright enough to do that.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Hardware Firewall Appliance, not just builtin by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      "NAT is an evil abomination that breaks the Internet's end-to-end model"

      Yep, just as PBX systems are evil abominations that break the telephone systems end-to-end model.

      Not every phone in an office building has its own "routable" 7 digit phone number, why does every computer need its own routable IP address?

    2. Re:Hardware Firewall Appliance, not just builtin by Chazmyrr · · Score: 1

      You must work for an ISP that charges extra for additional IPs. For the rest of us, NAT is what allows us to have all our computers on a LAN without having to pay our ISP extra $$$ per month per IP address.

    3. Re:Hardware Firewall Appliance, not just builtin by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, we had a PBX system here and every phone DID have its own routable 10 digit number. You could dial the last four digits within campus to call another campus phone, and all phones were reachable from the outside world with the full 10 digit number.

      We've since switched to VoIP with Cisco 7960's, but it's still the same; you just have to dial 7 first when calling on campus.

      Having a full phone number is nice; makes it easier for folks to call you.

      -Z

  300. Hardware's easier and safer by billstewart · · Score: 1

    It's nice that the firewalls are on by default in SP2, once you've got SP2 installed. Plug the cheap hardware device in to your network connection before you try to use them. Once you've got everything really configured the way you want, _then_ you can _think_ about removing the hardware firewall.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  301. Slipstreaming! by WH · · Score: 1

    I suggest you look into "slipstreaming" of Windows XP.

    Basically, you copy the files to a folder on your hard drive. Then you download whatever service packs you want installed and extract them with the /x option.

    Done correctly this gives you a directory with I386 pre-patched with whatever you want. Next, create an ISO image utilizing mkisofs from Cygwin (or linux) and finally burn it to a CDROM using Nero or whatever windows/linux app you want to use. PRESTO.. an install CD with all relevant patches!

    WH

    (For what it's worth, I just learned this trick the other day while trying to fix a laptop with a broken HD.)

  302. sfdyn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fsgn

  303. HOW!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HOW THE HELL CAN YOU GET A VIRUS JUST UPDATING WINDOWS! I'm not being rhetorical. I really worry about you incompetant 'linux' users. I mean honestly, I've used Windows almost my entire life, and gotten 3 viruses total. The only security exploits that actively dog windows are ones caused by egotistical bitter linux users who slashdot from their mother's basement.

    Screw linux, microsoft's 'incompetant tech support' has an 800 number. Why waste all your time trying to recreate windows features in open source... just use windows. Right after you have to reprogram keyboard drivers to boot.

    1. Re:HOW!! by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      just like that, the poor author of the article doesn't have a firewall and by default the windows box is so vulnerable that before he can begin to download anything from the sick old world-wide-web, his open ports let the worms in and render the machine unusable ... it actually insane that a by-default windows box is so "opened-up" that it can be hacked down before you can click on the "explorer" button.

      as for your "3 viruses total", when i used windows i was careful enough so i only saw 1 windows virus in my own machine ...

      but this is still 1 more than i wanted to see.

      i want a normally working bash perl gcc g++ to work on my machine, i also don't want to restart the machine every time i moved the mouse or keyboard to "make the changes effect"

      i also want to see my machine stable as hell : :~$ uptime
      09:43:24 up 127 days, 22:45, 1 user, load average: 0.50, 0.25, xxx

      i also want to be aware why something in my machine isn't working (either a software or hardware issue). in linux i can quite simply find the problem. in windows i get something like hardware error 1F and i'm stuck with it, no help here or there, and the "supportline" dudes only recommend me to visit my hardware dealer. later on, i just accidentically find out that actually the poor machine only suffered from the shortcome of IRQ's so i disable the serial port and everything works fine again ...

      this is why windows is a nonacceptile choice for me:

      a) i want to do my work (can't do this on windows)
      b) i want to keep the worms away (no comments)
      c) i want to be sure that if i turn my back to the machine it will stay working and not crash.
      d) i want to make software updates without the need to restart the machine.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    2. Re:HOW!! by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

      8 0 0
      Strange I get no dialling tone.

  304. Mod parent down by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    For my own abysmal formatting!

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  305. What you are actually saying is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That it is getting impossible for a normal windows user to re-install his or her machine. The virusses will get to you before you can get up to date.

    I notice that in my surrounding: 5 minutes online on a dailup connection on a not yet patched machine (download a 300MB patch over a dailup takes pretty long) is good enough to catch blaster and some others.

    Well, the system is not useable anyway: Spyware ruins IE everytime, making re-installs of windows necessary

  306. What everyone here seems to forget... by Jorrit · · Score: 1

    Is that most users are not capable to do things like 'turn on firewall' or 'install this program to fix that vulnarability'. Most solutions that I have seen posted here involve some kind of tweaking to firewalls or installing some external firewall box and things like that. Please don't forget that most people don't even know what a firewall is, let alone know that they even need it. I wonder what solution there is for a non-technie home user who is just capable enough to install windows but nothing more. Of course one could argue that that user should just have his OS installed at the shop. That might be the only solution perhaps.

    Greetings,

    --
    Project Manager of Crystal Space (http://www.crystalspace3d.org). Support CS at http://tinyurl.com/cb3x4
  307. Somewhat OT, but... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1
    While we're on the topic of network security, I was wondering if anyone had some advice to help me secure my current gateway a little more.

    I'm currently connecting to the internet through a Mandrake Linux box. It's got two NIC's (One to modem, one to switch). To initially get things working, I did the sinful thing and clicked the "Enable transparent network connection sharing" button from drakconf. So in short, it will act as a gateway to anyone on eth1.

    To secure the box:
    • I set security to "higher" to generally make the box a little more paranoid.
    • It doesn't run any services it can live without, period.
    • I installed Shorewall to block most of the crapflood coming from the Internet; It accepts local (over eth1) connections for http, https, ftp, ssh, and a couple others that don't immediately come to mind. Except for exactly two IPs belonging to my friend, it silently drops every incoming packet except for HTTP and FTP.
    • For what it's worth, I wrote a primitive script that uses openssl dgst -md5 to watch for any changes in /etc, /usr/sbin, /usr/bin, and /var/log (beyond normal entries, of course).
    Well, that's what I've done to secure my gateway. The whole reason we started using this box as a gateway is because it's predecessor, a D-Link hardware gateway/router, wouldn't work with the new DSL modem. Thus, it's unfortunately directly connected to the internet for the moment. The IP changes constantly, so it isn't going to be pinned down. I have looked at /var/log/messages (among others) and seen a lot of attempted pings dropped, but no evidence of having been 0wn3d yet (Except for exactly two IPs, it looks as if nothing is there).

    Anyone got suggestions for further securing the gateway? BTW, on my end, I ssh into it frequently and check for bandwidth use, users online, file changes, etc.
  308. D/l it with Linux!!! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    I wonder if it isn't possible to download the Microsoft package through your web browser in Linux. Don't they supply a URL?

    I'm suggesting this because I am mainly a FreeBSD and Linux user, but I use Windows 98SE, the latest version of that stuff that I will touch, and I do not need to apply patches of any kind as these machines never connect to the 'net. In fact, my firewall rules do not allow any packets to or from the Windows machines, and they are used solely for running specific applications that have no alternative OS replacement. Yeah yeah, Wine and CrossOver Office, Bochs and VMware, yeah yeah yeah... :-)

    But seriously, how come you can't download those patches using Linux, and avoid letting that Windows box touch the 'net until it's locked down (as much as possible)?

    Finally, I highly recommend getting a hardware firewall like the firewall/NAT/hubs that Linksys sells... They're not foolproof, but they'll make your life much easier.

  309. simple solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    simple suggestion: ignore microsoft's INSANE suggestion to disable all firewalls. they dont know what they're talking about. (even the built in xp firewall would do...)

  310. serious problem , easy to fix by Blue_MiSfit · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a 100% true story. Any time this year I tried to reinstall a machine at school (UC Santa Cruz) that was connected to the network, it would immediately be attacked by blaster. No warning, the system would get the RPC death knell and die. This was with a copy of XP that I made that had SP1 slipstreamed into it. The answer, however, is very simple. 1) Download the SP2 network install ahead of time and burn it on a CD (throw on your chipset drivers too) 2) format and reinstall with the network unplugged 3) install chipset drivers (for DMA) 4) install SP2 5) plug into network and run windows update etc... volia. If you can't get ahold of SP2 ahead of time, use any decent software firewall (Zone alarm and norton both work pretty well) or a hardware firewall preferably. They aren't really necessary though, SP2 will save your life.

  311. this guy is an idiot by cpdsaorg · · Score: 1

    After installing the OS and AV software (McAfee in my case) offline I activate the XP firewall and download the update for the AV software then the windows OS updates. What idiot uses software that tells you to turn OFF the stupid firewall??

    1. Re:this guy is an idiot by cpdsaorg · · Score: 1

      also for the record I use only Linux at home and XP professionally. I have had a XP machine infected during install at work. Ever since I have never deviated from the above methods. Doing so would be a waste of time.

  312. What a stupid question! by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    I know, there are no stupid questions but only stupid people, but... How to avoid viruses at Windows install time? By avoiding the Windows install time maybe? Seriously, asking "how to avoid viruses at Windows install time" is equally smart as asking "how to avoid viruses at anal sex without a condom time." Maybe consider some alternatives: Debian, EROS, KeyKOS or maybe even OpenBSD would be a good place to start instead of asking loaded questions.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:What a stupid question! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, that was a pretty obnoxious and useless response. Way to set an example of how not to respond. The question was obviously asked by someone who is less technically knowledgeable. No reason to get all high-and-mighty on him. Judging by your journal, its no wonder you're moderated down.

  313. NEVER connect a PC directly to a cable modem by krick-zero · · Score: 2, Informative

    You should always use a router between your PC and the cable modem. My PC is safely hidden behind the router and has never been hacked.

    1. Re:NEVER connect a PC directly to a cable modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really?

      so those arent pictures of you nekkid doing something with a banana?

  314. Hardware firewall all the way by adrenaline_junky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I tell every person I know who gets a broadband connection to buy a hardware firewall device. If they invest in a wifi router for about $80, then they not only get a built-in firewall but also wifi a hub/switch as a bonus. As far as I am concerned, this is an absolute requirement these days.

    The NAT that is setup by default for all such routers is just the ticket to avoid viruses like blaster.

  315. Re:IP Theft and The Linux Community by Binary+Judas · · Score: 0

    Dude, Linux for the PS2 is official stuff..
    Sony provides it.

    --

    Tua consilia omnia nobis clariora sunt quam lux. Tu delenda est!

  316. Cert.org by The_jos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cert/CC has an article called "Before You Connect a New Computer to the Internet"

  317. firewall by tsaille · · Score: 1

    I usually (i do this for a living) install windows, install ZoneAlarm, then connect to network. I mostly have to use this on computers hooked up through MSN internet, or some of the other large Inet providers. As far as all the "this guy an idiot" remarks here, ignore them, they are idiots that dont think about the fact that most users aren't versed in internet security, and dont realize the threats that are out there. It was a good question, I just hope others aren't turned off from asking other questions of the like. Most people that own cars dont know how to service them either, that's why there are mechanics to go ask and webpages that deal with car maintenance.

  318. For a moment there I thought we were in trouble! by jaghatarjankare · · Score: 1

    Oh what a relief. I see all the good suggestions here. For a moment I thought the Windows platform had finally died out! What a relief it survived!

    I like Windows - I really do, I really really do - and it would be a shame to see it go all for the sake of a nasty bug or two. Or parasite. Or whatever you call them.

    OK, that's all I can write now. Me and the wife are going for a walk. We live in a bad neighborhood so it takes a while to get dressed. We wear body armor made out of kevlar and she and I both carry AK-47s and hand grenades and I wear a mortar on my back just in case and if things get really bad we've got a bazooka in the car.

    It's a good neighborhood really - we feel really safe here.

    Bye!

  319. Re:IP Theft and The Linux Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Linux Version(Distribution would be Redhat 5.x iirc) for the PS2 was actually developed and published by sony
    http://www.linuxplay.com/

    The only other Distribution for the Playstation I know of, is blackrhino
    http://blackrhino.xrhino.com/main.php? page=home.
    Also hardly Illegal as it requires the original Linux Kit

  320. Downloading patches to a vulnerable box. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    run 'shutdown -a' once blaster or similar worm hit and system counting down to reboot, windows will stay crippled but should allow enough time and functionality to download the updates (probably not to install tho), and of course will need to remove whatever worm that got in after updates are installed.

  321. Same on all OSes? Hardly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Debian GNU/Linux, for example, doesn't initially listen to any services that could be cracked. If you have network connection available during installation you'll always install the latest versions of every software. A bug in the kernel TCP/IP stack could still do it, but even the installation medias are updated every now and then.

    I agree that using stale install medias and having services up before they're patched is inviting disaster.

    Microsoft isn't completely oblivious to the update-hell: You can preinstall WinXP SP1 to the installation media (it's called slipstreaming). And you can add new drivers too (using the unattended installation mechanisms, I think.)

    http://www.windows-help.net/WindowsXP/winxp-sp1- bo otcd.html

    Now, if you complain that linux is hard to install, can you imagine instructing your granny to slipstream her windows installation medias and add lastest drivers? :-)

  322. Layered defense by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1

    The MasterCard way:

    Installing 'doze unconnected to network - $189
    Installing software Firewall - $69
    Connecting to Linksys/D-Link/Netgear - $45
    Having Windows boot without turning into the great whore of the internet - PRICELESS

    For everything else, there's Macintosh.

    (Don't you think this smiling gentleman agrees?)

    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
  323. Why on earth did you leave the XP firewall OFF!!?? by leereyno · · Score: 1

    The VERY FIRST THING you should do after installing XP is TURN ITS FIREWALL ON and LEAVE IT ON unless it causes problems with one of the software packages you're trying to use. At the very least you should leave it on until the system is completely patched. Then you should make sure the system is set to automatically download and install updates without any user intervention. You can do this via the group policy editor. If you leave the firewall on, set the system to auto-update, and use a good anti-virus program (which should also be set to auto-update) then the only thing you have left to worry about is spyware/malware and end-user stupidity.

    I have to deal with haxored systems at work all the time and every time I do a rebuild I yank the ethernet connection and make sure that the firewall is turned ON before I reconnect it to the network.

    I would think that this would be common knowledge if not common sense. I can understand that you don't do windows support for a living, but how about doing a little research before you make a post to slashdot asking how to tie your own shoelaces? I expect that the only reason this made it past the moderators is because its inherently anti-MS.

    When I first started to read your post I was worried that there was some worm that the XP firewall didn't block. I was shocked to learn that you hadn't even bothered to turn it on.

    Maybe this will teach you rule number 1 when it comes to Windows security: You can never been too paranoid.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  324. Install W98 instead by jesgar · · Score: 0

    It doesnt suffer from such attacks.

    1. Re:Install W98 instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay is this why I have no idea what these people are talking about...I'm using a dinosaur? I got hijacked once, I deserved it...prOn. I opened an Email once that I knew I shouldn,t have and got My Doom,but thankfully AVG caught it instantly. I want to get a new system for a home server... can someone suggest the best setup ....Please

    2. Re:Install W98 instead by paz5 · · Score: 1

      for setting up a home server it depends on what you want it for... if you want it for http ftp ssh and so on then linux really is the easiest way to go (if you can set it up which now is fairly easy) most windows ftp http ssh solutions will cost some more money somewhere or be using less than great servers (with the exception of apache) when you install linux and ask it to install apache it will normally give you a working setup right after the install, but when you install apache on windows it takes a bit of configing (not that bad)

      If you want to do file sharing and such with other windows machines i would recomend using a windows machine (you can still do ftp http and such but those are trickier than on linux). Linux does have samba and can share files using "windows filesharing" but in my experiance it is easier to get an xp machine sharing to xp machines than linux to xp

      so my recomendation:
      ftp http ssh - use linux
      windows file sharing - use windows

  325. disable inbound connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In win2k you can try doing this (same should be applicable for winxp),
    1) open the advanced TCP/IP settings
    2) click on options,
    3) Select TCP/IP filtering
    4) click on properties
    5) Enable the checkbox Enable TCP/IP filtering
    6) select permit only for all the three options (i.e. TCP ports, UDP ports and IP protocols) donot add any ports as this is for incoming connections only
    7) say ok to save settings (on all the dialog boxes)
    8) You will be asked to reboot for the changes to take effect.
    9) Reboot and connect to the net and install the updates.

    1. Re:disable inbound connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check the below URL for more details
      http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx ?scid=kb; en-us;816792

  326. Enable a firewall first by Cato · · Score: 1

    The solution is to install a firewall from CD before connecting to the Internet - unlike anti-virus software, firewalls don't really need updating, so the fact you are installing a CD version doesn't matter. A relative of mine runs an NT4 PC that doesn't have the latest security updates, but that doesn't matter since she has a firewall, so she has never been hit by a worm.

    Then, install and update the anti-virus software, and run Windows Update, before using IE or Outlook for anything else.

    And of course, using Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird will avoid one class of future infections.

  327. Re:Why on earth did you leave the XP firewall OFF! by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

    Firstly, it looks like he was using a Firewall. The Norton one. He didn't conncect until that one was up and running.

    Secondly he says that the recommendations from MS were that firewalling software was turned off during updating.
    Now to me that's not a good idea. And MS have got to have their head in the clouds to suggest it. Oh, that and sometimes ignoring Microsoft's recommendations is the best way to go...

    ...but having said MS updates don't always play well with other things.

    Tiggs
    --
    Tiggs
    "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  328. crap, you're plain wrong by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    the ICF isn't great, but what it does do is BLOCK INCOMING CONNECTIONS ON ALL PORTS VULNERABLE TO INFECTION. not OUTGOING, just INCOMING but that's good enough to get you patched safely unless you're dumb enough to go looking at dodgy sites. sheesh, this isn't rocket science.
    also note that any decent firewall (kerio personal firewall's free and great) will also work. those who've installed norton and still got hit are just being plain dumb.

  329. Number of steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, download SP1 and all other critical updates from another machine, or even through Linux (as many people have suggested). That way in the future, you should never have to connect to the Net to install SP1, and afterwards you should be fairly "safe".

    If you have cable/xDSL, then get a router. Most have NAT firewalls, which blocks all desired ports from virii and attacks (and you'll get a lot, believe me).

    However, many people haven't mentioned what to do if you're a dialup user after a fresh install, and that's a fairly big problem. Once I dialled into my backup ISP without patching, I got hit by Blaster and the likes within 20 seconds. Only thing I can suggest is a software firewall like ZoneAlarm, but I don't know how good it is at preventing infection. If you set it to asking you what to let through once you install it, you should be ok.

    Fun fact; if you're connected via dialup or xDSL to AOL, you're automatically protected. Don't believe me? Try an unpatched machine connected via normal Windows dialup, then try an unpatched machine via AOL. You won't get hit by anything.

  330. First-run Checklist by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

    I think the main error here was using shrinkwrapped software "as is" on a machine you were trying to connect to the Internet. These days whenever I'm dsue to reinstall Win2K I make sure I know where my copy of the latest Service pack is, and pull down a fresh copy if I have to.
    Seeing that you work with other computers, I assume it's possible to download other software first. These days, I'd say that's essential.

    My personal recommendations would be to firstly use a hardware firewall if possible. I know sometimes this isn't always possible, but it's a good idea to have something between the Internet and your newly-installed machine.

    Secondly pull down the full installation package for the Service Pack first, and burn to CD. (Either that or slipstream it) Then get the SP on before connecting. This means that any vulnerabilities that were closed in teh latest Service Pack will be closed before you even go online.

    On a similar tactic to the second point, download (if possible) the latest signature file for your anti-virus software. The problem with store-bought software here is that the virus definitions will be woefully out of date. So download the latest definitions and get them installed first.

    With whatever your firewall-of-choice is, start off by closing off anything you don't need yet. Similarly go through Services and deactivate anything you don't need. (Same theory as in Linux, really. Don't leave any services running that you don't use)

    Putting it all togther, make sure that your system is as up-to-date as it can be, with an active firewall, recent anti-virus, and no unnecessary services running.
    Now connect it to the Internet.

    Tiggs
    --
    Tiggs
    "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  331. Uhhhhh.... here's a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install a damned hardware firewall (LinkSys, etc) and you won't even have this problem. Sheez...

  332. There is a solution from MS by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    If you have a CD-Burner, you can install the MS patches right into the i386 directory using a technique called slipstreaming.

    This will leave you with an up to date system before the network drivers are even activated. I've made several myself, and they're a godsend. :)

    --
    It's been a long time.
  333. excellent by magic087 · · Score: 1

    im glad someone posted this, i didnt think to, but just recently i had reformat 3 time in a row because of this very problem before it even occured to me to do it this way (i know, im lame) and its funny, i did it exactly as you did, even the same programs :) good work posting it :)

    --
    Magic087
  334. Installing patches. by ScouseMouse · · Score: 1

    I had this problem as well when i had a internal ADSL modem in my old windows XP box.

    The solution i came up with is to route everything through a Linux box. I used the internet connection on my Linux box and set a connection up with network card and a cross over cable, effectively using the Linux box as a NAT box.

    These days, i have a dedicated ADSL NAT (Binatone ADSL 2000) box which doesnt let though a great deal by default, so its relatively safe unless a machine at the wrong side of the network is infected. Graham

  335. NAT-Router / Hardware-Firewall / Old PC by Tux2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Like many others said: Get a cheap "internet router" that does NAT (Network Address Translation). If the attackers can't get to the fresh XP machine, they can't kill it. Easy, isn't it? Just turn OFF UPNP support and all DMZ / port forwarding stuff on the router.

    If you still have a spare PC (minimum 486SX-25, 8 MB RAM, Floppy, two ethernet cards), give fli4l (or any other small Linux router software) a try. Download size is a few MBytes (ask your friends / neighboors), complete boot floppy is created within a few minutes on any Windows system. No linux knowledge required.

    Keep the NAT router between the XP machine and your internet connection even after you have completed the XP setup. Though the router may not help against using IE and Outlook, it will help against all TCP and UDP based attacks. All viri and worms that spread by connecting to any TCP or UDP port on your machine will fail to infect your machine thanks to the NAT router.

    Tux2000

    --
    Denken hilft.
  336. WRONG!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The article submitter could just as easily have written "Can a home user install and update Linux without being attacked". It doesn't matter which OS you install, if it's out of date then you're vulnerable. I think the article is almost flamebait!

    Complete crap. Unless you install a Linux distro that opens 50 ports to the web by default (no modern ones I assume), then you will NOT get infected. Example: on install, Mandrake will warn you about services set to run that will listen on outside ports. At that point you can choose not to install those services. Also, you can disable any service during the installation.

    With Red Hat/Fedora, you configure your firewall during the installation. You can block all incoming ports out of the box until you can hit Red Hat update, and grab the patches.

    I'm sure other distributions are similar. Most Linux distributions these days don't do moronic things like install processes that open ports to the internet by default, and CAN'T BE SWITCHED OFF without crippling some essential functionality.
  337. and play an *BSD CD forwards by hughk · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...and you find it full of daemons!!!!

    Sorry, I couldn't help it!

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  338. Use ICF, you noob. by kyhwana · · Score: 0, Troll

    Just turn on ICF (Internet Connection Firewall) before you plug it back in, yesh, it's right there.
    WTF was this even posted?

    --
    My email addy? should be easy enough.
  339. windows by techefnet · · Score: 0

    argh.. ive been a linux user for a long time now without touching windows for a while, but lately ive tryed installing windows 2000, and its a pain in the ass, virus, problems, unstability etc... now i remember why i switched to linux in the first place....

  340. What great investigative journalism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't our fault this guy couldn't be bothered to toss a simple NAT device in between him and his ISP's externals.

    And for you "Oh no, extra cost/hardware Windows sucks!!!!" people, remind me when the last time you spent ten or twenty bucks bothered you all that much.

  341. Reinstall/Activate more than 7 times by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

    And you won't be able to re-activate your Windows XP again
    I found it the hard way.

    Fair? Who said life was fair?

  342. Install Windors behind a Linux firewall by Nichole_knc · · Score: 1

    That is how I do it. My home network(s) are located behind not 1 but 2 stateful linux firewalls and each machine has its own firewall Linux(iptable), BSD(ipfirewall) and window boxes (Nortons, zonelabs). When building windows boxes behind my walls I have not had anything get to them when they are in their "virgin" state...

  343. for german speaking windowsuser... by scheuri · · Score: 1

    the last few times I installed WinXp... 1) got the SP1 and the latest drivers 2) got the update-pack from http://winboard.org which includes all patches until two month ago 3) got http://www.free-av.de (virusscanner) 4) burn all these things on a CD 5) unplug cable to internet, boot, install XP, SP1, updatepack, free-av, plug cable back in, to to windowsupdate.... 6) finish my 2 rappen scheuri

  344. Re: doh....go to grcsucks.com by acariquara · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I know that. I was assuming you got DCOMBobulator/etc PRIOR to reinstalling Windows, duh!

    Just put it on a memory-key/usb drive and you are good to go.

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  345. Cheap ISPs and crap like that by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the easiest way to clean avoid these problems would be to build a simple firewall into cable/dsl hardware.

    The way I imagine it, the thing comes with all incoming ports blocked by default. The installation tech simply generates a random admin password for the modem and includes it with the literature along with instructions on how to access a web-based interface. The benefits here are immense:

    (1) The ISP will probably make its money back on bandwidth consumed by the worms' random scanning, irate morons hogging tech-support lines and complaints from people being scanned by their network. Honestly, how much could a dinky little firewall add to the cost of a cable modem?

    (2) Totally transparent to regular users. It just works . . .

    (3) Anyone that *needs* open ports ought to be smart enough to figure out how to use a simple web-based interface to open the ports he needs.

    Am i missing something? I mean, it won't protect dial-up users but it sure is a start.

    ?

    1. Re:Cheap ISPs and crap like that by emtboy9 · · Score: 1

      Aye... that sounds about right... all he really needed to do was go to the local bestbuy, or really any other big box retailer or any decent computer store and pick up an inexpensive cable router... cable router plugs into the cable modem, routes to the internal network. Most all now come with built in firewalling, web accessible configuration, NAT, etc... and you can pick them up for 35-45 dollars on average...

      --
      "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
  346. i do similar by KIEDIS · · Score: 1

    i unplug the machine, install and everything...i set up the network and stuff...patch the computer for blaster and its friends, reboot and then i connect it to the net... I agree its pretty stupid because in order to get the patchs you need to get infected at least once:) so what i did is mainly kept a copy somewhere and when i got a computer to install i do this and over the network i find the patch and install it...usually before going online i install two things...antivirus, and firewall...this helps a lot. when i go online finally i update everything, OS, antivirus, firewall, etc and then another nice reboot and everything should do fine:)

  347. I must be a lucky windows user... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had half as many problems as people here seemed to have with windows, I would've stopped using it a long time ago. However, after many years of using 98 and XP:

    1) I don't recall ever seeing BSOD
    2) Never gotten a worm, much less one in 6 seconds after fresh install
    3) Never had my computer hijacked
    4) Usually when something does go wrong, I can pinpoint the source of the problem by looking in the mirror

    Unfortunately the same can't be said for my friends or family. They seemed to be perpetually plagued with windows problems.

    This makes me wonder, while windows is far from perfect, maybe the main problem is sitting in front of the monitor?

  348. Installing Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I do (on Win2K, but XP should be similar) is:
    1. Download the free ZoneAlarm, and save it.
    2. Go offline.
    3. Install Windows
    4. Install ZoneAlarm
    5. Re-boot, starting ZoneAlarm
    6. Confirm that ZomeAlarm has blocked all unnecessary ports.
    7. Go online, and surf to Windows Update (it works over Zone Alarm).

  349. Use a hardware firewall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would prevent an attack on the machine during installation, and for simple applications one can find cheap routers with firewall integrated.

    The second benefit is that it helps transferring files from any older computer you may have. You do not plan to use floppies for this, right?

  350. Download patches before installing the OS by Danj2k · · Score: 1

    The way I'd do it (in fact, the way I did do it, before I got laid off due to the computer shop I worked at closing down) is to download the necessary patches beforehand on another computer and burn them to CD. Then you can install them on before connecting it to any type of network. Alternatively as someone suggested you can get an Update CD from Microsoft, which might be easier if you don't have access to broadband.

  351. I also keep getting a worm before I finish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been trying all weekend to re-install Windows 2000 without getting a worm before I finish downloading the security updates. I have tried to do that three times so far but have failed each time. When I finish I always run the free ClamWin virus scanner and it says that I have the Lovgate.W-2 worm. I plan to try using a different virus scanner to see if perhaps it is just a false positive. I also had the same thing happen about a year ago, except that back with I was using the McAfee virus scanner and it was a different worm that got in before I was done.

    On the last two attempts, I started by installing Windows 2000 with service pack 4 from the CD. I then installed the latest free Windows Security Update CD which is the Feb 2004 version. I then installed the free version of the Zone Alarm firewall which I had downloaded while running Linux. I also avoided turning on my old computer which is attached to it by ethernet cable. I had already become aware that that my old Windows Me computer has both a virus and a worm on it.

    I then connected to the Internet with my dial-up connection at 26.4k. The telephone lines in my neighborhood are only good for 26.4K so it takes several hours to download all the critical security updates. During those several hours the Zone Alarm firewall is always going crazy with warnings. Various messages would pop up asking me if this or that connection should be allowed. I had no I idea which messages were for things that are part of the Windows update process and which were not.

    There were also several attempts to connect to my NetBios. During one attempt to install Windows, Zone Alarm blocked about 50 minor intrusions and one serious attack. It was also disconcerting how the Windows update would say it was done downloading and then during the install phase the lights on my external modem would show continuous downloading. The install phase required almost as much downloading as the download phase did. When I was all done WinClam said that I had a worm already. Maybe that was just a false positive. ClamWin 0.35 is still in an early beta version so maybe it is wrong about my having a worm. By the way, I also use the Linx version of the Clam virus scanner under Linux and it says (as expected) that I do not have any viruses on my Linux partitions.

    I should also add that, I use Linux most of the time and only check my e-mail when running Linux. I do not plan to enable the use of my pop e-mail accout from within Windows. I like to have all of my old e-mail messages in one place and it is safer to open the messages from within Linux anyway.

    With a slow 26.4K dial-up connection I felt like a sitting duck for the first several hours while I was online download the critical security patches. Cable and DSL is not available in my neighborhood in this part of Arizona. Not being an expert in security, I am totally confused on how to safely install Windows. I am thoroughly tired and fed up after a weekend of this.

    1. Re:I also keep getting a worm before I finish by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      I have been trying all weekend to re-install Windows 2000 without getting a worm before I finish downloading the security updates. I have tried to do that three times so far but have failed each time

      Really, this is absolutely shocking. The next time I hear anyone mention anything about linux not being ready for the desktop; i'll be directing them to this post. It seems to me that stuff like this just is not exposed to the people that pay the bills. If windows is really this awful that it gets infected before the installation is even complete I'd have to question why on earth are people paying the money to run it on their systems.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  352. Re:What a stupid answer! by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    This really was such a not usefull contribution. Really thank you for your thoughts. -NOT-

    Perhaps, if you don't understand the problem behind the question, better withhold your sleve from reacting.

    OTHO the last part could be intetresting, but that's an obvious 'solution'.

    I wonder why you reacted like this to a question that addresses a serious problem.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  353. Re:Linux Firewall? by wirehead78 · · Score: 1

    Can anyone link to any documentation on how to make a Linux firewall?

  354. NAT gateway by jonadab · · Score: 1

    You say you've been using Linux for years? Okay, so then you know about IP
    Masquerade, yes? Use it. Pull a spare Pentium-90 out of the closet, put an
    extra $8 NIC in it, set it up with your favorite distro, and connect *that*
    system directly to the net. Set it up with a second, local network on the
    second NIC (I usually use 192.168.0.*), and have it masq that network onto
    the internet. Hook your Windows system up to the local network and have it
    use the IP-Masq box as the gateway. This protects you from anything that
    relies on open ports to spread, which includes most worms. You still have
    some vulnerabilities, mostly in clients, _especially_ Outlook Express, which
    you should avoid entirely if at all possible and certainly at least until
    you've got all the updates installed.

    People with no Linux experience can buy a hardware NAT gateway or firewall
    and accomplish basically the same thing.

    When you finish getting Linux installed, you should still leave it behind
    the NAT gateway. You can turn off all the software firewalls you want then;
    although they do provide one additional piece of protection (namely, flagging
    certain kinds of rogue outgoing traffic that can be caused e.g. by spyware),
    that's more a form of detection than prevention, so switching it off for a
    few minutes to install some updates is not a big deal. The NAT gateway will
    cover the more important function of preventing rogue incoming traffic.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  355. Why didn’t you post this Friday? by guybrush876 · · Score: 1

    It would have save me a lot of work because I probably would follow some of the suggestions here presented before doing a windows XP reinstall this weekend. So 5 minutes after I completed the installation and connect to the internet to do the critical updates, the computer shuts down, the sasser worm attacked. So an hour later and countless reboots I get ride of it a can complete the updates, only to find out that some spyware ad already infected the computer before I could even install firefox. Install a bunch of ad-awares and run then, and still one remains, surf the internet for removal instructions; find it in some forgotten forum, complete the clean-up. So conclusion part of the weekend wasted, and the next time someone asks me to install XP I tell them that I out of town this weekend. Well at least Portugal beat Spain so the weekend wasn't a total lost.

  356. Tragic, but I had to laugh... by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1

    ...because the exact same thing happened to my Mom recently. She got a Toshiba Notebook, installed the Earthlink Internet software, went out on the web, and picked up Sasser in record time. I fussed at her and told her to reinstall from scratch, then install Norton before going out on the web. She did; same thing happened. Obviously, she aquired the worm either

    a) WHILE she was activating Norton over the Internet, or
    b) BECAUSE Norton didn't automatically shut down ports once it was activated.

    My question is, why is Norton not designed so that it closes all ports during the initial "registration" process, except of course for the port used to serve their registration process?

    --
    Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
  357. You could just... by DarkLox · · Score: 1

    I just install winXP with my network card unplugged. When windows installs, turn on the XP firewall, that thing isnt letting anything through...do updates, turn off crappy (yet almost too highly effective) windows firewall. Or just install it behind a router with only port 80 forwarded.

    --
    Momma told me that sigs are for the devil
  358. Ummmm by Vertigo1 · · Score: 1

    Get a firewall, and get behind it. That is #1 way to avoid viruses at install time. What was so hard about that?

    --
    That darn Slashdot is so cool... Hey did you pay the phone *(#(Q%$#$ NO CARRIER
  359. connecting and updating with dial-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those of us with a slow dial-up connection we do not just simply "connect and update". The telephone lines in my neighborhood are only good for 26.4K and DSL and cable is not available. When re-installing Windows 2000, downloading the critical security patches was a several hour ordeal during which my Zone Alarm firewall was going crazy. The firewall kept giving me pop-up messages asking me if various types of connections should be allowed or not. I had no idea which were really part of the Windows update process. It also said that there were a couple of attempts to connect to my NetBIOS. Zone Alarm claimed that it had blocked over 50 minor incursions before the critical security updates were installed. It would probably have taken longer if it weren't for the fact that I had already installed the latest free Windows Security Update CD from Feb 2004.

    Afterwards ClamWin 0.35 said that I already had the LovGate.W-2 worm. I plan to try a different virus scanner to see if perhaps that was a false positive. About a year ago I once installed Windows 2000 once before and was using the McAfee virus scanner back then. When running the McAfee virus scanner for the first time just after installing the critical security updates it found a worm. It was a different worm back then.

  360. Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is always the possibility that you've got bad memory, messed up hard disk, your CPU is frying itself, you've got some hardware that makes Windows crash... It's not necessarily a virus or an attack. I can always get my Windows machines patched before anything bad happens to them.

  361. router by DerWulf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Pick up a router from SMC ( I can recommend the 7008/4 ABR series). Even if you don't want to setup a home network, this is the best way to go I think. Even with the sygate firewall it could ( in theory) happen that the software silently crashed, leaving the icon still in the system tray until you move the mouse cursor over it. Also I wouldn't rely on Windows Update to keep your computer safe. If your unpatched version can get infected, your updates will not prevent infection when someday an exploit gets releases sooner than the patch. When using a router, all incoming connections will be refused by default since the router itself is only running the administration tool. Add a personal firewall for save measure in case the router gets compromised and you are set to go. Also you can seamlessly add computers to your network, all sharing the same internet connection and printer. As a side note, the Norton firewall has crappy configuration options and its all in baby talk. I didn't like it very much. Zonealarm doesn't work well with edonkey, overnet, emule, also, if you forbid all the notorios windows applications (explorer.exe, alg.exe, svchost.exe) all access to the network, you are in for a very unstable windows expierence. Sygate is still the best of the three.
    I bought the router to finally rid me of the personal firewalls tedious configuration ( which btw, you have to do again on each install, with the router it stays with you forever ;)

    Not associated with SMC, I just picked up the model mentioned above friday and I am very happy with it.

    --

    ___
    No power in the 'verse can stop me
  362. Gateway router by Jerdie · · Score: 1

    Just put your computer behind a gateway, that's what I do at home, and none of those worms can reach my machine.

    --
    Programming is simply the application of logic to creativity
  363. Late To The Game, But... by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

    Most of the agreed advice seems to involve either using a 3rd party product (including routers) or burning the patches on another machine.

    Can anyone answer how you could safely install Windows if you don't have another machine and only using Microsoft tools/products?

    NOTE : Sending off for a patch CD is not allowed as an answer since you have to be connected to the Internet in order to be able to order one.

    Bob

    1. Re:Late To The Game, But... by GoulDuck · · Score: 1

      There are two solutions to your request:

      1. Start the builtin firewall i Windows XP.
      2. Stop the services (daemons) that are vurlnerable.

      1. is the easists thing to do, but 2. is the more cool way to do it if you don't have to use these services in the future.

  364. Re:Linux Firewall? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    www.iptables.org

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  365. Firewall + XP Unattended Install by Metal+Remains · · Score: 1

    First off you should recommend that the cable/dsl connection have hardware based firewall. These are cheap enought for even grandma to buy. Secondly, you can wrap all the hotfix and service packs into the install of XP by creating an unattended cd and using cmdlines.txt to install the fixes.

  366. just a suggestion by Malphaedrius · · Score: 1

    ignore norton and just enable the built in firewall then download your patches. leave the firewall on because it will protect you and still let you download the updates. That is how i did it after MSblaster was released I don't know about the new breed of worms though.

  367. GET A NAT ROUTER AND CHANGE THE PASSWORD! by browman · · Score: 1

    It's about the best way of protecting yourself from this crap.. hundreds have said it before me, and it all makes perfect sense. I've been using one ever since I got DSL, and never had any problems with internet worms attacking my machine directly.

    --
    You fool! You've given cheese to a lactose intolerant volcano god! Do you know what that means?
  368. You need a firewall... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    Why the heck are you connecting your machines directly to the internet? You should as a minimum have a router/switch inbetween your valuable systems and the outside world. Better yet, set up a firewall between your modem and the rest of your network.

    There are several linux distributions that are dedicated firewalls - you can get an old P120 and a few NICs to do the trick.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  369. Or you could simply ignore... by NumbThumb · · Score: 1

    ...the microsoft instructions. They actually tell you to turn off all firewalls for the windows update?? What a heap of bull!

    The update is, AFAIK, done by HTTP. No reason to turn off your firewall, which should, at this point, block *all* incomming TCP connections (and also *all* incomming UDP except DNS and DHCP ports). It should also definetely ALWAYS block at least the most vulnerable MS ports, ie. 135-139 and 445, from enything outside your local LAN. ALWAYS! Use Kerio (downloaded it using a linux box) for that, it gives you full control. Make sure you have "Microsoft Networking" disabled, and do not register the network card you use to connect to the cable modem as a "safe device".

    But it would be much easier and safer to do this through a (linux or BSD) router. Oh, and BTW, the Norton stuff is by itself as bad as a virus: it messes with a lot of stuff, quite frequently screwing up your system, leading to things like, well, continuous reboots, hosed network devices, etc.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this 120 chars is too small to contain.
  370. DOH!!!! You messed up on one step by clickster · · Score: 1

    Don't turn off your firewalls, regardless of what MS says. I leave mine on while updating and have no problems whatsoever. I install Windows, AV, and firewall. Then plug in the NIC and get an IP address, then pull down updates. DONE! What I NEVER EVER EVER do is turn off my firewall.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  371. Dumbass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DON'T run with the firewall disabled! PERIOD!

    Dork...

    1. Re:Dumbass... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Hello, dimwit.

      Look at his step 11:

      11. Start to pull down Service Pack One; per Microsoft's instructions, all firewalls are turned off.

      So what you're saying is, "Microsoft rocks! And by the way, don't do what they say, it's wrong!" Okay, Mr. Consistency.

      Dork...

      I think you're the dork, for being suckered by Microsoft into believing that a system which can get 0wn3z0r3d within ten minutes of installation unless you happen to turn on the firewall is actually a "good" system worth paying money for.

      We Linux people don't even pay for our operating system and we at least get something which isn't rootable directly out of the box.

      (Note to those who will inevitably think I'm Microsoft-bashing: I typically stick up for Microsoft in situations where it is appropriate, but in this case, it really is moronic that Microsoft recommends disabling the firewall during Windows Update.)

  372. Re:48VDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can a home user install and update Linux without being attacked?
    Sure. Isn't that the point? These posts talk about using Linux to download the software, writing it to CD, then using the CD to update the Windows install without the network attachment. Simply put, practically any Linux distribution in the past five years is much less vulnerable to network-based attack. Perfect? No, but there have been "firewall-on-a-floppy" projects for a long time now; the kernel (thanks Linus) and network drivers (thanks Don) are solid; and services, in general, only run when you tell them to. This was all defined and working before W2K was ever released.
    I understand the argument is that Linux has not been targeted as much as Windows by virus writers, so it's not clear how vulnerable it really is. But Linux has been the swiss-army knife of the IT industry since Windows '95 was released. Of course, there's been little, if any, recognition of that outside of IT. It's kind of like in the movie, Fight Club: we route your packets, we serve your websites, we guard you while you sleep. Perhaps it's time for a programmer or two (or maybe even a virus-writer?) to step up to the plate and give their opinion on Linux vs. Microsoft.

  373. Avoiding viruses ...etc. when installing Windows.. by unics · · Score: 0

    That's easy.

    1. Install Windows XP.
    2. When your network get's configured, make *sure* you customize the TCP/IP Connection to enable the built in firewall of Windows XP.
    3. Continue your install of Windows XP.

    If your computer comes with a automagic install of Windows XP, leave your connection unplugged until you can enable the built in firewall.

  374. Builtin Firewall by DoctorHoe · · Score: 1

    All you have to do is disconnect your cable modem during install. Once you are done installing and ready to connect through your ethernet you need to go into My Network Places, click on View Network Connections. Then right click your local area connection and click on properties. Once that window opens click on the advanced tab. Then you check the box that says "Protect my computer and network..." That only allows outgoing traffic and incoming traffic that was requested. Now you may connect to your cable modem.

  375. People Uninstalling Security You've Installed by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    before explaining them how to use this "ZoneAlarm thing" on their computer. Then I put them behind a NAT as well. Next time I come home, the computer is plugged straight into the cable modem, and zonealarm has been uninstalled. WTF! /me smacks head

    That's when you shake your head and say, "Okay. You've removed software and hardware that I spent time installing. You've decided that you know more about networking and computers than I do. You don't need my help with your computer anymore." After that, simply refuse to help them with any computer problems ever again. I've cut off my father.

    My father is familiar with Windows 98 and Outlook; it's what he had where he worked. I built a machine for him - Windows 2000 with Eudora. Of course, having to enter your name and password to log in was "too complicated". He couldn't handle Eudora (probably because he took a 10 hour employer-sponsored course explaining how to use Outlook).

    Now, how difficult will it be to use Windows 2000 if you're already familiar with Windows 98? How difficult will it be to use an e-mail client you've never used before? I likened the whole thing to getting into a rental car. All cars have essentially the same controls, but you should spend the first few minutes in the parking lot, figuring out where the windshield wiper and headlight switches are.

    I told him, very simply, to enter his username and password to log in. Using Eudora: click on the little icon of the envelope without the blue arrows to make a new message. Type the message. Send it. Even with a 10 hour training course, he still didn't know how to send attachments in Outlook, so I wasn't worried about him not being able to handle highly advanced features like signatures and spell-checkers.

    Anyway, next time I was there, he asked me to check a problem with his computer. It was now running Windows 98, Outlook, and about 50 pieces of spyware and virii.

    I shrugged, shook my head, and told him that I wouldn't support the machine if he would no longer trust my judgement in software.

    So, he took it to a local electronics chain store which offers computer service. For $150, he lost all the data on his hard drive but got a fresh install of Windows 98 and Outlook. Which were promptly screwed again.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  376. "Hardware" Firewalls by alexborges · · Score: 1

    HAW HAW HAW...

    No such thing dufus...

    A cisco pix is an i486sx box with a disk on chip running Cisco IOS (a bsd derivative) with some firewall um... SOFTWARE on it.

    If cisco happened to distribute cisco for instalation in any pc, it would make it a "software" firewall and it could run in a HECK of a better hardware than the shitty i486 it does (for 4000 bucks, no less).

    So think about what you post once in a while. No such thing as a "hardware" ANYTHING. Hardware is iron, all intelligence is software.

    Jerk

    --
    NO SIG
  377. So, does anybody know what let the viruses in? by mwood · · Score: 1

    My guess is that step 7 is the culprit. You need to be sure that File and Print sharing *never* gets turned on at any interface connected to the outside world. But I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that the automagical network connection setter-upper doesn't bother checking this and doesn't give you the option either.

    Any Roadrunner customers know for sure?

  378. Windows Firewalll by malfunct · · Score: 1

    Here is my method for updating an XP box which hasn't failed yet (though has plenty of opportunity for failure, people just haven't taken the time to make thier worms pierce the XP firewall).

    1) Shut down computer
    2) Unplug net cable
    3) Boot the install cd
    4) complete install process
    5) enable the XP firewall
    5a) (optional) correctly configure an external firewall to put the XP pc behind
    6) Plug in net cable
    7) Download all updates

    I've done this many times an never gotten a worm before update was complete. If I don't enable the firewall I can guarantee a worm in the first minute.

    --

    "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    1. Re:Windows Firewalll by suman28 · · Score: 1

      But how do you remove the virus called WindowsXP that you installed youself? :-)

  379. MSN = Instant Virus by insanechemist · · Score: 1

    I had a similar experience installing XP Pro on my sisters PC.

    1. Install XP (reformatted entire drive in process)
    2. Install fresh AVG downloaded via my Mac
    3. Install SP1a also downloaded via my Mac
    4. Install MSN from a disk - the version that came with XP Pro didn't recognize her logon!
    4. Sister says - can I check my email now???
    5. I say - Heck ya sis - and fire up MSN
    6. 2 minutes later - AVG says "XYZ worm found". Don't remember the exact one.
    7. Computer crashes
    8. Restart, run AVG, worm is purged.
    9. Try MSN again - another worm installs itself, computer crashes.
    10. Purge worm again.
    11. Download Zonealarm via Mac
    12. Install on XP Pro machine
    13. Try MSN again - all seems well now.....
    14. Scratch head - MSN is worm ridden???

  380. What I do by Rhaize · · Score: 1

    the safest way is to download the updates for administrators who distribute updates from their server. burn that to a Cd, etc. baring that

    I'd say try updating windows first, with the firewall on.. once you've fully patched windows, then move on to installing/configuring norton with the firewall off. you won't have the vulnerabilities that you need the antivirus software for when you update it. and you won't need it while you have the firewall.

    --
    Within the arms of tragedy, there is little comfort in being right.
  381. Easy by mixmasta · · Score: 1

    Get a $50 NAT box to protect you until you get it patched and secure.

    I wouldn't use Windows on the internet without one.

    Alternative: If you are too cheap to invest in the NAT, turn off all those services, network dcom (dcomcnfg), and turn on the XP firewall and you will probably be able to last a few minutes to get the patches.

    --
    #6495ED - cornflower blue
  382. Enable the built in firewall by cascadefx · · Score: 3, Informative

    Enable the built-in firewall in Windows XP before going online. This will resolve a lot of your problems.

    Also go into the widnows update site (on another connected computer) and click the update options to the right. There is an option to turn on the catalog view (or something like that... in Linux right now). This will allow you to search for all the updates of a particular Windows platform.

    Use this to download the patches and burn them to a CD... Use this CD to patch your system.

    Jim

  383. hardware by portscan · · Score: 2, Informative

    just buy a hardware firewall. do the install with the network cable unplugged, then plug in from behind the firewall to get the updates.

    alternately, you could download all the service packs, patches, etc., burn them to a CD, and do the install completely disconnected from the internet, then run the patches, then connect.

  384. uh.. win xp comes with a firewall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    turn it on and you won't get jack shit.

  385. Evils of NAT by billstewart · · Score: 1
    I do in fact work for an ISP that charges extra for additional ISPs, but that's not related to my assertions :-) I also get my DSL from a local provider that offers static IP addresses for a reasonable fee, though they charge more for their basic service than some of the newer dynamic-addressed DSL providers.

    I didn't say NAT isn't useful for some things - I've also got most of my PCs behind a NAT firewall, because they need some kind of firewall and because it's the lazy approach to DHCP support (otherwise I'd need to program the static addresses into all the machines, including the ones that really are client-only.) NAT's not the best kind of firewall, but it's a start, and I can hang any reasonably-safely-configured servers off the DSL directly.

    But it still breaks the model that lets the Internet work well.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  386. turn off system defaults by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    The services affected by some of these worms have default action of shutting the system down. If you change the default action while the system is not on the network then when you do get infected you can keep working because the system won't shutdown in 60 seconds (which is what happened with Blaster).

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  387. tip by drinkable_person · · Score: 1

    i know there is a way to download the updates as a install file so you can go to a friends and download them burn to cd and install from cd

  388. Cross-platform common sense! by macraig · · Score: 1

    Install and configure the firewall FIRST, BEFORE you establish the first connection. Doh!

  389. Dumbass geek by thegreenman66 · · Score: 1

    As a only slightly geeky computer guy, I have managed many many times to install, reinstall, update, etc... Winxp win2k win98 on several machines with no virus or trojan attacks while on broadband connections. This entire thread is a retarded troll. M$ may be the evil empire but if you can't even the install software successfully you should unplug all your computers, give them away, and instead go back to playing Risk with your incompetent geek buddies. You are a complete dumbass!

  390. An alternate approach by babbage · · Score: 2, Informative
    Hmmm...
    4. The box remains off the net during the entire install: no registering, no setting up an ISP, no activation, no network configuration, no nothing. (BTW, the only networking component that I install is tcp/ip. All the other MS stuff never gets on the machine.)

    Using TCP/IP may have been a mistake. It was, after all, the vector by which the malware installed itself to begin with.

    A better approach may be to do this with two computers, where one is the machine onto which you need to install XP and the other is already up & running with whatever operating system you like.

    This second computer will act as a bridge to the internet, speaking TCP/IP only on its WAN interface, and speaking a non-routable protocol like NetBEUI to the XP machine on the LAN interface.

    This way, the XP machine can only speak to other local machines.

    With a setup like this, you can download the necessary service packs and other updates to the gateway machine -- people have already explained this in some detail elsewhere in this discussion -- and then the XP box can access the updates by regular old fashioned Windows file sharing.

    Once you have the minimal updates, then and only then does it make sense to turn on TCP/IP support on the XP machine.

  391. The simple solution... by ChodaBoy · · Score: 1

    is to forget about software firewalls and get a decent hardware router. Most wired only routers sell for about the same price as Norton Personal Firewall if not less. That way you're at least protected from viruses like Sasser, etc. until you can get your Antivirus of choice installed and updated. Just be sure to change the default password on it to prevent someone trying to remote admin your router.

    --
    ChodaBoy
    - The preceding statement is the product of a deranged mind and the sole property of the voices in my head.
  392. 1st attempt... by Goglu · · Score: 1

    During the first attempt, I acquired a virus or worm before I could finish the Norton update (machine powered down)

    I understand that for Linux users, unaccustomed to The Marvelous World of Windows (TM), a machine powering down could look suspicious, but don't worry, it's part of the standard MS strategy of rebooting after every update. You'll find that a powered-down machine is very soothing.

  393. simple, really.... by Ummagumma · · Score: 1

    purchase a home router (Dlink/Netgear/Linksys etc...) and make sure you are behind that when you connect up.

    --
    "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
  394. Installing WIndows Virus Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of insecure networks are you people using. I've been installing Windows XP since RC2 and I have never gotten a virus while trying to do an installation. I'm curious as to how the original poster came to the conclusion that he had a virus when it doesn't sound like he was even able to get his virus/security software installed.

  395. use zona alarms firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest to use ZA free firewall, just download the executable with linux or somethink and install is instead of norton. You won't get any virus (I tried).

  396. Re: Why? by scupper · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the original concern.... "Can a home user install and update Windows without being attacked by a virus or worm?" I agree with the issues you brought up about the routers, but aren't those vulnerabilities to an active hacking attack, vs. viruses like Sasser being propagated by infected machines? I've never had a problem as long as I did my updates from behind NAT. I also use SUS, and that helps avoid having to worry about going outside my lan with a fresh, unpatched install. I just update from my local SUS server.

  397. no mistery here by MasTRE · · Score: 1

    Install from behind a firewall. Problem solved.

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  398. Solution to delay the reboot process. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the solution for expanding the amount of time it takes before your computer reboots due to the Sasser worm. Keep in mind that you will have only about 20 seconds to complete the steps, and you must already know the system's name before beginning this process:

    1. Disconnect from the Internet.
    2. Restart.
    3. As soon as possible in the boot process, click on Start, Run, and enter cmd to open the command line interface.
    4. At the DOS prompt, enter shutdown -i and press [Enter].
    5. This command opens the control panel for remote administration of other systems, but for this process you will just need to enter the name of your computer.

    Click Add, enter the name, and then click OK.
    Now modify the warning message delay setting from the standard 20 (seconds) to a large number, such as 9999. After patching, you can reset the warning message delay if you wish.
    That should temporarily disable the shutdown sequence long enough for you to log on to the Internet and download the patch.

    Alternative solution: An alternative method for stopping the reboot cycle on XP-only systems is to enter shutdown.exe -a at the command prompt. That aborts the shutdown process completely and is obviously much faster for XP systems.

  399. Sorry, it may have been a false warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have now added a second anti-virus scanner to my newly installed copy of Windows 2000 and it is giving me different results. I ran the Avast virus scanner and it did not find any worms or viruses. That contradicts what WinClam said about having found the Lovgate.W-2 worm. I now think that my virus scanner was probably wrong about there being a worm on my computer. Apparently, after I download the critical security updates, one or more of those changed files must have been misidentified by WinClam as a worm. WinClam is still just an early beta version of after all.

    I will look into this problem further. I book marked a web page that describes what changes that the worm makes. I will check to see if those modifications exist in my copy of Windows or not. I will also download and run the disinfection utility and run it just to make sure.

    I still plan to only check my e-mail while running Linux. I suppose that a very conscientious Windows user could avoid problems if they were careful. They would need to keep their patches and virus signatures up to date and use a firewall. Even then they would need to warn every member of the family of the dangers of clicking on attachments. If they send out attached MS Word documents they also should understand what unexpected information they may be sharing hidden in the metadata of the MS Word document. Personally, I would not put up with all this nonsense. For the majority of the time, I just use an operating system that has almost no problems with worms, viruses and spyware. I have both Windows and Linux installed but I wonder if I should have even bothered to re-install Windows. I hope that service pack II for Windows XP will bring Windows security up to minimally acceptable standards when the update becomes available. I would not switch back to Windows as my main operating system even if they do fix the virus/worm/spyware problems. Sorry about the error in what I said.

  400. oh yeah by doorbender · · Score: 1

    i forgot i had installed all available updates from behind a firewall before bringing it over to his house

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
  401. S-I-M-P-L-E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Leave everything on (firewalls / AV)
    2. download the service packs that you need (DONT INSTALL) just download, it takes a little more looking but they can be found.
    3. disconnect the netowrk cable
    4. disable the AV/Firewall
    5. Install
    6. reboot.
    7. turn firewall & AV back on
    8. connect network cable
    9. send me $10

  402. your first mistake... by xpyr · · Score: 1

    ...was installing the norton internet firewall which advises you to turn off the xp firewall. Don't install that until you are all updated. The xp firewall is good enough for when you need to install patches. For sp1, just download the full network version and you can then disable your internet connection to install it. Reboot and it's still disabled but the xp firewall is active. So you then re-enable the xp firewall and then go download all the updates on the windows update site. Before rebooting you disable your network connection again, reboot. Then enable it again and check to be sure you have all updates installed by going to windows update again. That's it. Btw, I don't think you need to disable the xp firewall to be able to install sp1. Remember the first lesson, ALWAYS have a firewall active on your internet connection. You broke that rule the moment you disabled norton's firewall and didn't enable xp's firewall to install sp1.