Slashdot Mirror


Executing a Mass Departmental Exodus in the Workplace?

rerunn asks: "The recent story about the consultants from JBOSS walking out couldn't have had better timing. I'll save the drama and cut to the scenario: You and a few close co-workers make up the core grunts of 'the department'. The company relies heavily on your department for many services, some of which, other departments cannot provide. You like your job, it provides great satisfaction. Suddenly, the company realizes its in deep financial shit, and starts making cut backs. This impacts the department. You suddenly find yourself working 50-60 hour weeks, put on call with no compensation, given unreasonable amounts of work and generally treated like dirt. You get the feeling that the company is just going to take advantage of you no matter how and what happens. You get together with the rest of the department for a 'fsck this company' meeting and decide to walk out. Have you ever done this?? (We are so close!) What was the outcome?"

1,190 comments

  1. Result by Robert+Hayden · · Score: 5, Funny

    Six months of unemployment...

    1. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unlikely. Collecting unemployment usually requires leaving work through no fault of your own. Walking off just to prove a point or to be pissy won't cut it.

    2. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think he meant you will BE UNEMPLOYED, as opposed to collecting unemployment, although thats a plus

    3. Re:Result by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      I bet a lot more. Would you trust in an employee that have no problem on leaving you in the dust when you more need him?

    4. Re:Result by RevDobbs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A thought... you could just "slow down". Work slowly, stop doing things, make sure you only put in 40 hrs / week. In New Jersey at least, if you get fired you can collect unemployment after 2 weeks. Granted, I don't know how long you want to live on unemployment for...I think it's about 2/3 of your salary with a cap at $280 a week. Ugh.

      Also, there have been a couple of lawsuits where people have sued for unpaid over time... a class action suite between Walgreens & their pharmacists(sp) comes to mind. Shoveling a ton of work on you because you're "salary", "a professional", or "management" is illegal, and if you work cannot reasonably be done in ~40 hrs/ week you are supposed to be compensated for overtime put in.

      ::shrug:: IANALOAUO

    5. Re:Result by sICE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd call that hollidays :-)

      Actually I manage to work around 6 month a year, and get 6 month unemployed since 4 years. It's good to stay home, have a beer with friends, read a book, visits some places, etc... For me, unemployment is synonym of good time. And since i work on contract I'm getting unemployment funds while not working. Even have a t-shirt "Work to Live, Don't Live to Work". (The true story is also that I got fired once ;-))

      Best of all, each time you change jobs, you're facing new problems and it's really challenging sometimes.

    6. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Six months of unemployment... "

      for who??

      if your in the IT industry lock all systems to a password you know (ie make it propietary) and walk out.

      Move to mexico and come back in year and the company will have gone under...

    7. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      "Actually I manage to work around 6 month a year, and get 6 month unemployed since 4 years."

      That's just asking for Trollbait moderation. The rest of the country pays taxes so you can sit around and have a "good time"? Asshole.

    8. Re:Result by haystor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Trust is a two way street. How can a person trust a company that doubles the demands required for a regular paycheck just because management's plan isn't as profitable as once thought.

      You should not work more without some sort of compensation. Any change in your regular work requirements should come with negotiation. Management's line will be something like, "we all just need to dig in", but management usually has a bit more equity in the company. Negotiate for some of that equity. Negotiate a company policy for preferential promotions for those that did dig in. More vacation, flexible work hours, etc...

      Or just walk out all at once. They've made unilateral changes to the implied rules. Its your life and you owe loyalty to yourself first.

      Think that just because you're salaried means you should work 60 hours per week when called on? Try leaving work after 20 hours one week when you get everything done early and see just how flexible they are. Forty hours is implied most places.

      There are all sorts of exceptions to what I said above. As a programmer I expect a few wild hour nights/weekends when we are integrating or deploying to production. When I sign on to be a programmer, I can expect a few of those at milestones. I also expect that my output will be based on 40 hour weeks and not 60 hour weeks.

      --
      t
    9. Re:Result by elmegil · · Score: 0, Redundant

      They didn't say unemployment payments.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    10. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > have a beer with friends

      Which friends? At what time in the day?

      Otherwise, I do the same and pretty happy with it.

    11. Re:Result by boaworm · · Score: 1
      You miss the issue. Try reading the "POST" atleast :-)


      You suddenly find yourself working 50-60 hour weeks, put on call with no compensation, given unreasonable amounts of work and generally treated like dirt. You get the feeling that the company is just going to take advantage of you no matter how and what happens.


      Why would any employee ever feel any form of compassion/care at all about a company that acts like this.
      Of course you have to tell your boss how you feel, give the company a chance to correct its faults. (the entire company is working on overtime?).

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    12. Re:Result by arivanov · · Score: 4, Insightful

      May I refrase the question:

      Will you prefer a daft slug that stays until the final solution has descended on the office?

      Alternatively, will you take someone who can actually foresee the reality and where will the business develop to and has gone and tried to fend for himself before the shit has hit the fan (due to some idiot PHB with a mi(bi)llion sized compensation package)? Or an idiot with no business sense and a firm belief that "Build it and they will come"?

      I frankly prefer to work people with guts, brains and at least some elementary survival skills. If you like to work the gutless and brainless ones I am not really amused that you have to speak about things like loyalty to retain employees. That is instead of speaking of business perspectives (if any).

      Overall, loyalty is a concept to be mentioned around countries and ideologies. Die for your country for loyalty reasons - yes. Stay on a sinking ship (company) for loaylty sake - the f*** no.

      Loyalty and business do not mix. A decent business should cause a sufficient level of interest in the employee for him/her to be loyal without having to call on that loyalty. That is especially and mainly from the "what happens next perspective". Under "what happens next" I do not mean tomorrow. I mean years down the road. Yeah, times can get tough. But there is no reason to despise an employee that has jumped ship in a tough time if you could not make him/her believe that the times will get better and when they will get better.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    13. Re:Result by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      IIRC unemployment is not paid by the general tax payers. Its paid by your former employer. At least that is the way state unemployment works. I don't know about the federal "hard times" unemployment.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    14. Re:Result by chainsaw1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      True Story:

      In my previous consulting job, I was one of two people who had any knowledge of any *nix flavor (and thus I had one of the only Linux laptops) in the major city where we worked. Most of the issues I delt with were with our server side program, and required something *nix comparable for problem resolution and minor fix authoring (shell scripting, etc.). Everyone else, including area IT staff (cept the one other person) was NT background only.

      I had the guts of one major project along with sole copies of other work items including several client's maintenance scripts, the New Hire Setup and Installation Guide, SQL for finding database incosistnecies, the only UNIX installer for our software, etc. on my laptop.

      I was called out of the middle of meeting with the major project people to be laid off. My laptop was taken on the spot "to prevent destruction of important data".

      The rest of the project people never received the DB design I was going to present with them. As best I heard from other people afterward, no one knew how to recover the data from the laptop but the one remaining person and they nixxed his job ~3 days before the laptop was supposed to get to him (he was at a different office in the same city).

      Last time I checked up on my former company (less than 1 year after I was laid off), it was bought out by a competitor :)

      --
      - Sig
    15. Re:Result by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, sometimes it works out better for everyone.

      Just look at Daikatana!

    16. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      work? unemployment? can i install linux on them?

    17. Re:Result by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IIRC unemployment is not paid by the general tax payers. Its paid by your former employer.

      On paper, that is true. However, that money, along with the health insurance, benefits and other things that your employer supposedly pays for as well really just come out of money that was going to be paid to you anyway. The average employer pays about $1.35 to $1.50 per $1.00 that the employee receives. Amove that overage is cash that is put into the unemployment compensation fund. The fund would have no money if no one worked, so indirectly, you pay for it, as always.

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    18. Re:Result by cadillactux · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As was mentioned before, unemployment only applies if you get fired, or do not leave on your own accord.

      Instead of just walking out, and facing almost certain termination, take it a different way. IANAL, but I do not think a company can put you on call 24x7 without compensation. ESPCIALLY if it is not in your job description that you should hav signed when you started (or when it was last updated). Now, as far as the 50-60 hour work weeks, you ARE getting paid overtime for them? If not, I KNOW the law says something about that. But again, IANAL and I dont know if the law says something about the ammount of hour a company and make you work.

      But back to the On-call business. You have every right to say "no" to your company if they call you at home. Your personal life is your personal life and they are NOT allowed to ask you why you cannot come into work. You simply have to tell them you are unavailable. Or simply, screen your calls. If the company decides to get stupid and fire you becasue you would not answer their call-ins, you have legal grounds for an unlawful termination suit.

      Or, in troll terms...
      1. Blow of company call-ins
      2. Get fired by company
      3. ???
      4. Profit!!!

      Now, dont quote me on this... becasue laws vary from state to state, and even city to city... CHECK before you decide to do anything. Doing your homework is the best bet for fighting any tyrannic company.

      --
      Is this thing on?
    19. Re:Result by Sulihin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I spent over a year with the company I worked for being behind on paychecks (at one point 3 months behind, and until I left I was always down a month) and working uncompensated overtime due to the management constantly making promises to the customer that we then had to scramble to keep. I got laid off for deciding to use my vacation time over the Xmas/New year holiday. So much for loyalty.

      I wouldn't however walk out on someone without a backup plan (another job lined up) even if they deserved it. Particularly in this economy.

    20. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think unemployment is paid out of taxpayers' pockets?

    21. Re:Result by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1, Troll

      It may be illegal, but Bush and his cohorts are trying to legalize it, and good luck getting current laws enforced with Bushites running the DOL. Unionize and strike. I recommend the IWW.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    22. Re:Result by lophophore · · Score: 5, Informative

      Better read the Fair Labor Standards Act before you decide to sue.

      I.T. Professionals are specifically exempted from the Fair Labor Standards Act.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    23. Re:Result by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      At one of my previous employers when it became painfully obvious that the company was doomed, the Unix and DBA staff began to actively and overtly seek any sort of exit strategy. There was nearly an entire department walkout but that was narrowly averted.

      However, the same conditions that would have triggered that walkout occured again.

      When things came to a head. I was out of the building so fast that I didn't even bother logging out of all the systems that I was working on.

      It took them awhile just to clear that up.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    24. Re:Result by `Sean · · Score: 1

      I think it's about 2/3 of your salary with a cap at $280 a week.

      When I did my six months of unemployment after my previous employer shut down their Boston operations I was given $952 twice a month by the very generous folks at the Massachusetts Department of Revenue. Plenty of cash to pay the mortgage and bills but not enough to play.

    25. Re:Result by AiY · · Score: 1

      That's what the employers are counting on though. If everyone has that attitude then they can do what they want when the economy is "bad". The job market is never quite as bad as it seems and I know that it would be a very very serious decision to make if you had no alternatives. However, it is the only option that means anything to the employer. Working to the letter of your contract (job action, work-to-rule, working with rulers, whatever) is the other.

      You have to be prepared to leave if you ever use that as a ploy with an employer too, or else they own you. No one wants that... I hope. If it gets bad and they won't change, leave. It is much better for you.

      --
      "You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp." - Red Green
    26. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the other posters said, Line up another position first. Especially if you are not a member of some protected minority group. At my last gig the only people kept were minorities, handicapped, homosexual or from India.

      And pay off any bigh interest debt ASAP. Learn to live without cable TV.

      And remember: Some of your unhappy coworkers may be people who just like to stir things up. You may be the only person who leaves when it comes down to it.

    27. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said six months of unemployment, NOT six months of unemployment compensation!

    28. Re:Result by blastedtokyo · · Score: 0, Troll
      Next time I see a resume like yours I'll be sure to hire you, make you do manual janitorial work and make sure to lower your pay to minimum wage the day after you accept the offer.

      While you're lounging, your former teammates are cleaning up after your mess. Oh yeah, and remind me to blacklist you as broadly as possible.

    29. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Find another job
      2. start in 2 weeks
      3. Pull an "office space" at present job

    30. Re:Result by gmuslera · · Score: 1
      To be honest, I have been in a similar situation some years ago. Not was exactly a contract breach what the company did because there not was fixed work hours, but in some moment things get complicated, worked lot of months months a lot of time a week (more than 60 hours/week, averag), and I got very tired of the situation (and in general), and quit. Not was something like a revenge, leaving the company without a solution, helped to train the people that will be in my place and things like that, but had to be out there.

      But even if it was the right thing to do in that situation, I feel that I should not do the same again (for the kind of reasons that I posted before, for me mostly), and have to avoid this kind of situations in some way, either taking things less seriously or enforcing vacations, or changing a bit the letter of the problem to have less work.

      I liked the solution of having a work with fixed hours and if the company tries to take abusive measures just follow the contract to the letter, but in some kinds of work there are no such thing as fixed work hours.

    31. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. What you do is create a "dead-man's program" the requires you enter a password once a week or so. If you don't enter the correct password, it hopelessly fucks up their system(s).

      Then you make the passwords you need to type very similar to commands that, if typed outside the program, would also hopelessly fuck up their system(s).

      Then you tell management about this program, and the password.

      If they mess up and type it wrong, or type it correctly in the wrong place, or (better yet!) refuse to "fall for your transparent trick to get them to erase the database", so much the better.

    32. Re:Result by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked for a small company 6 years ago with 3 other IT members. We eventually split into a couple of groups. The people who worked and those who didn't. After a couple of years myself and one one (the workers) decided to approach management about our concerns. The work piled up and we were stressing to keep up with it.

      To make a long story short, after exhausting what we felt was all means available to us we went looking for employment. In a matter of days we both found another job at the same company. We turned in our resignation letters within 20 minutes of each other.

      To our surprise our manager didn't understand why we would leave. Unreal.

      From what I hear, the manager didn't get his bonus/raise as a result of our leaving. Loosing half your department hurt a great deal and I was sorry but felt we had no choice.

      If it's right for you and your co-workers then do it. Walkout but make sure you have the next job ready :-)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    33. Re:Result by RevDobbs · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to suggest unionizing, but like I said, I Am Not A Lawyer Or A Union Organizer.

    34. Re:Result by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      if you work cannot reasonably be done in ~40 hrs/ week you are supposed to be compensated for overtime put in.

      If that's truly the case, then I'm owed somewhere in the vicinity of 4000-5000 hours over the past 10 years.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    35. Re:Result by secret_squirrel_99 · · Score: 1

      I think it's about 2/3 of your salary with a cap at $280 a week.

      When I did my six months of unemployment after my previous employer shut down their Boston operations I was given $952 twice a month by the very generous folks at the Massachusetts Department of Revenue. Plenty of cash to pay the mortgage and bills but not enough to play.

      This is closer to right. The cap in N.J when I looked last year was $480.00 week paid bi-weekly

      --
      If privacy had a tombstone it would read "We did it for your own good" . -- John Twelve Hawks
    36. Re:Result by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I was going to suggest unionizing, but like I said, I Am Not A Lawyer Or A Union Organizer.

      You don't need to be a union to walk out, neccesarily. Here in Canada we have something called "Wildcat strikes", where regular employees band together for a specific purpose and walk out.

      The submitter would do best to contact his local labour board (and legal counsil) to determine his rights in this regard. If not properly researched, it's entirely plausible that his employer could fire his entire department as a result. Fired for walking out == no UI and a lousy reference.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    37. Re:Result by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Unlikely. Collecting unemployment usually requires leaving work through no fault of your own. Walking off just to prove a point or to be pissy won't cut it.

      Peoples livelihoods depend on their employment. A walkout is not something that happens "to be pissy" People have been pushed quite far when it gets to that point. The basis of organized labor is not spoiled / lazy brats.

    38. Re:Result by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2, Informative

      and you are a fool to not force your employer to pay you what you are due.

      i am paid to work 40 hours a week. thats what they get.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    39. Re:Result by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      Bloody hell, that's generous! It's about 60 UKP a week in the UK, and that reduces after 6 months. You also have to prove you're actively looking for a job, and after a certain time they make you look further and further afield. There is income support for things like mortgage interest, but only after 9 months of unemployment and only if your mortgage is less than 100,000 UKP (about the average these days). Basically, if you're out of work in the UK you find a job fast, have insurance against such things, or join the underclass.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    40. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is something called "constructive unemployment" though.

    41. Re:Result by spirality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Walkout but make sure you have the next job ready

      Unless its real bad, but having another job lined up before quitting your current one can not be stressed enough.

      -Craig.

    42. Re:Result by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Loyalty and business do not mix.

      this is the single most important thing that has ever been said on slashdot.

      All of you need to remember this phrase. I dont care if your boss is your best friend, you have been there cince day 1, whatever...

      when it comes down to the wire they are not and never have been loyal to you as an employee. They will can your ass with as much regret as not having chicken salad for lunch.

      you as an employee mean nothing to them (management) because if you did, you would have been promoted into management. (and then you still mean nothing.)

      Remember 2 important things.

      1 - they do not own you. no matter how they try and make you think that.

      2 - YOU are doing them a favor by working there, not the other way around. You were the cheapest they could find at your skillset. if there was someone cheaper, they would have hired them instead. and your replacement will walk into the job at a pay rate that you are at now or a little higher.

      Dont trust your employer, dont be loyal to your employer, and do not under any circumstances forget that you are making money for them by doing them a favor in showing up every morning and using your skills and talents.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    43. Re:Result by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Funny

      There time is long gone

      With the invention of K-Y Jelly, unions were made obselete.

    44. Re:Result by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh. The last place I worked (here) bought our office (we were a smaller company at first) and, within 6 months, had laid off 50% of the staff. Obviously, things went to shit from that point on. They fired just about everyone else the day after the Christmas party in '01, and I held out until the end of January. (I was making about 30% more at a better job within 2 weeks.)

      I was happy to discover they've since gone chapter 11, and their stock (DVINQ) has been delisted from NASDAQ, and is now trading at $0.021. They couldn't even pay the 2003 NASDAQ listing fee! I might buy them up after I clean my couch.

      Isn't karma a beautiful thing?

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    45. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually in NJ if you get fired you can collect unemployment after 4 weeks of penalty time as long as the reason you got fired doesnt involve a criminal act. And you can actually collect up to $475 a week. Do ask how I know.. heh

    46. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's truly the case, then I'm owed somewhere in the vicinity of 4000-5000 hours over the past 10 years.
      No, that just means you are an idiot for working those extra hours and not getting any compensation.

    47. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corrupt unions are far more prevalent in the U.S. than elsewhere, frankly. In plenty of other first world countries, unions perform a valuable representation of workers rights. In some countries, such as Columbia, union leaders are specifically targetted for execution, yet they continue to work for workers rights. Rather than just complain about unions and then wonder why Americans work more hours per year than anyone else (including the Japanese), according to ILO research, work to change them to work for you. In short get off your arse and fix the problem, don't just complain about it.

    48. Re:Result by kevlar · · Score: 1

      New Jersey has a cap of $425/wk

    49. Re:Result by kirisu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you ever even been in a union? Unions protect you from getting fired for punching in a minute late. Unions make sure you get fair compensation for holidays/overtime/pulling double shifts all that kind of stuff. Yes, most union presidents are as good as criminals, but unions still help out the workers.

    50. Re:Result by sam_handelman · · Score: 2, Interesting
      [Firing people for unionising] may be illegal, but Bush and his cohorts are trying to legalize it, and good luck getting current laws enforced with Bushites running the DOL. Unionize and strike. I recommend the IWW.


      That may be an unpopular sentiment, but it is not a troll - firstly, it is advice (clearly sincere) directed at the story author, and secondly, in so far as factual assertions are made, they are well documented in the literature on the subject; when the same group of people were in charge in 1980-1992 this is exactly what they did.

      http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/articles/9708-UD-rel at ivity.html

      Clinton had very similar policies, as I'm sure we're all aware, but failing to criticize past administrations the same breath hardly constitutes a Troll. If I had moderator access at the moment I'd report this as an abuse.

      Personally, since there seem to be only about half a dozen workers in this case, collective bargaining seems un-necesarry. The story author and his coworkers should just walk out.
      --
      The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    51. Re:Result by Enry · · Score: 1

      That insurance would only be a few cents per dollar. Don't forget things like the employer portion of social security, health benefits, 401(k) matching, etc.

    52. Re:Result by dubious9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why did someone mod this a troll? Because, you all all envious of not working 1000 hour years? Take a look at contract jobs. Most start at six months of employment. These days most do not go longer than that.

      Employers, however don't have to pay extras for contract workers and thus they usually get almost twice as much more per hour, thus it is perfect resonable that you could live an entire year off of a six month employment, especially if that employment time has you working crazy hours.

      Americans work more hours at work than any other industrialized first world country. This shows off in our accomplishments: technology, military supierority. But this comes at a price: americans define themselves by their work. I agree with the parent and choose to define myself by the life I live, not the job I have.

      Just because parent figured out an arguably better way to live shouldn't mean he should lose karma. In fact parent probably has more real karma than workaholics who do little else than work. And for what gain? Money? At the end of the day what does that get you?

      Please mod parent back up.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    53. Re:Result by eison · · Score: 1

      Generous?
      Our employers are all required by law to pay for this insurance. So, we all have insurance, but it's been paid for.
      Personally, I would rather have just been given the extra money up front. But, that's just me.

      --
      is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
    54. Re:Result by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Would it have really "gone to you"?

      They put the money into that fund like that at those rates because the government says they HAVE to. If the government didn't say they HAD to, then sure there would be more money in the companies pockets to pay salaries, but whose to say they would actually pay you any more?

      More than likely it would go into managements coffers or into their profit margins and not into actual employee salary.

      Thats nto to say they wouldn't make salary somewhat higher, afterall, it would mean people would be operating without that cushion, so people would need to be paid more to make up for it.

      of course, extra wages only really make up for that cushion if the empoyee has good personal money management skills and socks that money away for a rainy day. How many do that?

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    55. Re:Result by PSL · · Score: 1

      Unemployment != unemployment checks. They were just out of work for 6 months... aka UNEMPLOYED.

      --

      "Times may change, but standards must remain the same." - George Carlin.
    56. Re:Result by AlricTheMad · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The unfortunate thing is, Unions are exactly what the members put into them, just like the US government.

      Yes some Unions may have corruption at all levels, but at least the members have the ability to make a change. try that with Enron or Worldcom.

      I belonged to a union (CWA), heard a lot of members complain, but it was mostly those that really didn't come to meetings, or vote in electons.

      The Union belongs to the members, they are responsible.

      AlricTheMad

    57. Re:Result by dubious9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Next time I see a resume like yours I'll be sure to hire you, make you do manual janitorial work and make sure to lower your pay to minimum wage the day after you accept the offer.

      While you're lounging, your former teammates are cleaning up after your mess. Oh yeah, and remind me to blacklist you as broadly as possible."


      ... and from anonymous coward in reply to same grandparent: " That's just asking for Trollbait moderation. The rest of the country pays taxes so you can sit around and have a "good time"? Asshole."

      Two things, if he's collecting unenployment, it means he didn't leave under his own accord. Secondly, it often happens that a person can't find a job that pays as much as unenployment. Why work a meanial job when you look for a better one and get paid as much or more doing it?

      In responce to the cleaning up the mess crap, most contract jobs last only six months. Also, if he did bad work at previous jobs, the next employer would hear about it while checking backround. Idiots.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    58. Re:Result by tom's+a-cold · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Loyalty and business do not mix.
      I render the same loyalty to my employer as I expect from them. I'm aware that they are in business to make money, not to provide for my welfare.

      "Lifer" colleagues of mine who thought that there was more in the relationship than mutual exploitation (with most of the power on the employer's side of the equation) had shocked looks on their faces when they were unceremoniously booted out the door.

      Me, I work hard, do a good job, but monitor the warning signs and am ready to jump before I'm pushed. I've only had to do it once in a very long career. But if you don't have a "fsck you fund" built up that allows you to walk out when they start taking advantage, you are unprepared. If you do have it, and they know it, you'll find that you get more respect. If you show signs of weakness or dependency, they'll use that leverage.

      --
      Get your teeth into a small slice: the cake of liberty
    59. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did that. More against a really bad supervisor than the entire company. It worked, though. The supervisor was transferred and we stayed. You need to have an excellent argument and proof to pull this off, though.

    60. Re:Result by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 1
      Being unemployed and arriving at a state of unemployment does not necessarily mean that one is collecting unemployment insurance. One could simply be unemployed for six months.

      ::Colz Grigor

    61. Re:Result by dslbrian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Walkout but make sure you have the next job ready
      I can second this. Myself and two coworkers recently (last Sept) left our old job for a new opportunity. We were all EE-majors doing IC design work at a major cell phone maker. It wasn't a bad job, but the dept was crippled by bad management. Projects that should have taken months took years instead, and even then a good bit of them were eventually cancelled. All the while the boneheads in the organization floated to the top and the whole mess degenerated into a political power grab for upper mgmt to feed their egos into thinking they were doing something important.
      It might not sound untolerable, but trust me after you work on a project for a long time, spending uncountable hours of overtime on it, only to have some bonehead screw it up, you get seriously pissed off. So, after enduring this for a while, myself and a couple others (majority of the core people in our group) decided to look elsewhere. The choice of people was not accidental. The three of us were diverse enough in skills and experienced enough in past projects to function as a self contained design group.
      Outside of work we negotiated with various people to move ourselves as a group to a new company. This is where industry contacts really pay off. This part took a long time (on the order of a year or more), and a couple of our opportunities collapsed before they ever got anywhere. But eventually we negotiated to all move to a new company and form a new design group. At that point we got offer letters extended to all of us, told our previous employer we were leaving, and a week later we were in new offices, with new cubes, etc.
      Now in the short term it sucked as we all put in a lot of overtime in order to set a good impression on our new employers. They had a bunch of urgent projects for us to chew on, so they were eager to have us go. Everyone got ~30% pay increases to boot, so it all worked out. There is always the risk of unemployment in the near term, whereas in the old job one could assume some amount of job security (I personally think this is a bad assumtion), but I wouldn't change my decision either way.
      The thing people should realize above all is that job security does NOT come from your job, it comes from your skills. If you have skills, you can get a job. Jobs come and go, but your skill set stays with you. The best thing you can do as far as job security is to learn as much as you can and augment your skills as much as you can.
      I would recommend that if you know a group that is skilled and intends to leave a company, work on lining up a new job first. It may take time, but there are huge advantages in moving as a group. The new company should realize that in acquiring a group of people, they not only get new skilled people, but people that have proven that they -can-work-together-. This is a great benefit, especially if the group can work on its own. In addition, you end up knowing your coworkers, and what their skills are or are not. Pick good people, and move as a group, I would highly recommend it if you can do it.

    62. Re:Result by SlideGuitar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sure, but I left my job when it got bad, sold a house in LA, moved to a cheaper part of the country and I could live off the house proceeds for a couple of years without worry and still buy another house....

      I'm looking for work, but I'm not worried, and dear God in heaven, I'm so glad I left the job from hell... the only question is "why did I stay so long?"

      Now my motto, and I really believe it, is "do what you love and the money will follow..." to which I add, "live where you love living... and life will follow." Why live in an industrial hell hole when you can just move to your idea of the most beautiful part of the country and work out the trivial stuff like how exactly you make a living once you get there?

      Most people make a living in most places, after all.

      That's my theory... but I haven't got a job yet, and in the meantime I have those house proceeds to live off of... :-)

    63. Re:Result by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      Illinois is around 330 a week.

      This does not pay for shit, even in a po-dunk town like Rockford, IL. I'm just glad I don't live in a suburb or Chicago itself.

      Unemployment in my area is about 10%, due to it's heavy reliance on industry, I am currently underemployed as a line person at a food manufacturing plant. Years of IT experience, and a degree.

      I want to see the underemployment statistics. Of course, I could be at my level, for all I know. All I know is that when I started college, I was pretty sure I wouldn't end up back in my home town working at a frozen food joint.

      --
      Dan
    64. Re:Result by Boomer2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I was going to suggest unionizing, but like I said, I Am Not A Lawyer Or A Union Organizer.

      Unions are for sissies who don't have the brains or the skills to stand on their own two feet.

    65. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A-men

      Once I finally put working for a company into perspective it really cleared up quite a few things for me.

      I perceive my job as a contract between my employer and myself. They pay me x number of dollars to have me show up every morning and do whatever work Iâ(TM)m responsible for according to my job description and responsibilities. It's a contract. This makes very clear to me that they are doing me no favors, and in return I am doing no favors for them. We are simply meeting the contract agreement. Once the contract becomes unsatisfactory for me, I have the right and the obligation to myself to find a more reasonable contract someplace else. You can rest assured that should the contract (your employment) become unsatisfactory for the company you will be laid off w/out a second thought.

      Looking at employment in this manner has given me a much clearer perspective on working. With this understanding of what work really is I no longer feel that the company I work for is doing me any favors, that I owe them anything beyond coming to work and doing the job I agreed to, and that it's perfectly acceptable to me to find a new contract (job) if this one becomes unreasonable. It also has given me perspective that Iâ(TM)m not willing to explicitly trust companies I work with, and makes very clear that it is in my best interest to be very involved in decisions concerning my job responsibilities.

      I'm not sure where the loyalty and "I owe my company x" feelings come from but they are incredibly misplaced at your place of work. If youâ(TM)re going to be loyal to something.. Be loyal to your family or your friends. At least then there is a good chance that they will return the loyalty to you, unlike a company does.

    66. Re:Result by Boomer2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you ever even been in a union? Unions protect you from getting fired for punching in a minute late.

      Yeah, sure...I've seen firsthand what unions do.

      Unions keep the slacker from being fired who was found asleep on the day shift when the company prez toured the plant. Unions kept the slackers from being fired...until the whole place went under from being overloaded with slackers, costing Westbrook, Maine, hundreds of jobs.

      go unions....

    67. Re:Result by BobRooney · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Scenario:

      Your boss requires you to work 50-60 hour work weeks without compensation. You and your co-workers are so fed up you want to just walk out. If you don't care if you get fired, and in fact wouldnt mind it as an alternative to quiting(mmmm unemployment) just start working EXACTLY a 40 hour work week to the second. Arrive at your desk promtly at 9AM work until your appointed lunch break, take a full but not long lunch break. Never ever ever ever eat at your desk or order food in. Leave the office for lunch every day. Finally, do just enough of your job to qualify as doing it. If you're in the middle of a line of code when 5PM rolls around stop, save your work, lock your workstation down and walk out the door.

      If your employer complains or reprimands you point out that you are doing your job and doing it competently. If they want you to do more they need to compensate you for your work. Also, cite life events and create "plans" that are inflexible and preclude you from randomly working late. Kids/wife/sick family member work very well for this.

      Basically, do nothing "wrong" but do nothing extra either. They'll either hook you up with a raise or fire you. Either way its on your terms.

    68. Re:Result by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      He didn't say "six months collecting unemployment compensation", he just said "six months unemployment." You can be unemployed and not collect unemployment.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    69. Re:Result by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "They will can your ass with as much regret as not having chicken salad for lunch."

      Written like someone who has never had to lay someone off. A good businessman will be willing to make hard decisions, but that doesn't mean he will have no feelings of regret.

      "do not under any circumstances forget that you are making money for them by doing them a favor in showing up every morning and using your skills and talents."

      I don't know about that; I know quite a few people that must cost their employers more money than they bring in. They do not "do their employers a favor" in showing up. Why aren't they fired? Not every employer is a ruthless business tycoon who can be modeled as a "rational man" decision maker. Spend a little more time working in the private sector, and perhaps your "black and white" take on the employer/employee relationship will be a little more realistic.

    70. Re:Result by dogfart · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Or another way I heard it said:

      No matter how much they talk about loyalty, no boss will ever risk their career sticking up for you.

      When directed to cut force (or to increase the workload insanely) no boss will ever refuse to do so out of loyalty to their underlings

      --

      "dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

    71. Re:Result by gabec · · Score: 1
      Regarding the 40 hours per week thing, I don't know if this is really the same thing (maybe I should go squeeze for some money!), but at my old job they required you to work 45 hours a week minimum.

      that 45 hours had to be 100% billed to a client. if there was any time you couldn't bill to a client (like, say, a company meeting) you had to stay late to make up the time.

      This being my first job out of college, I emailed my school's Career Services department. She replied back saying that it depended on the contract type. You can be Salaried and still get overtime, or you can be salaried and essentially work as a contractor where you're expected to work until the job gets done. :/

    72. Re:Result by tigga · · Score: 1
      You were the cheapest they could find at your skillset.

      Or one can put it another way - You are the skillest they could find at your salary level ;)

    73. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Local labor board? Are you kidding - I'm in the USA! The democracy where we're number one and we fight for our freedom, except for discussing personal rights or labor issues - heck that's commie talk.

      I don't think most people here could find a local labor board or couselor or public interest law firm that handles labor issues in their town if you gave them a map.

    74. Re:Result by divisionbyzero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, companies are not your friends... If they were they wouldn't try to exploit you. There are some legitimate reasons for going above and beyond the call of duty, but assuming the dept. is run properly, they should be few and far between unless it's your own business.

    75. Re:Result by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      You seem to be stuck in an hourly-wage world.

      In the real world, with salaried staff, you don't have these luxuries. There is no law requiring that all employees receive overtime beyond their 40-hour work week, nor are there laws requiring compensation for off-hours support (e.g. "on call"). You have every "right" to say "no" to your boss at home, provided you aren't breaking your contract with your employer, and provided you're willing to lose your job.

      You might be able to say that the changes to your job aren't within the job description you signed up for, and you might be able to use that as a basis for renegotiating your salary, but if you're too unwilling to adapt to your company's needs, your company can pretty easily replace you with someone who is. If their demands have shifted to the point where your job description is no longer appropriate, they can pretty easily lay you off and create a new position better matching what they want.

      Now, I'm not trying to suggest that companies are free to treat their folks like shit, but to suggest that what they're doing here is illegal is a bit inaccurate and doesn't really apply to salaried employees.

    76. Re:Result by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      My dad used to work for McDonnell-Douglas in Long Beach, CA, until he was hurt on the job. He went from having the strength to carry 200 pounds on each shoulder at the same time to having a 15-pound lift limit on his right arm. The union gave token help at the civil suit, and refused to help him locate around $3000 in tools that he was not able to recover from the plant following his injury. He has never been compensated for them, even though the union and McDonnell-Douglas both acknowledged that he had them the day he was hurt, he did not take them home, and that they had not paid for almost all of them.

      He hates flying on civilian aircraft. He knows what the people who built the planes were like, how they slacked off. It was a constant complaint that he had to redo much of their work so that things didn't fall apart in flight (I don't know how much of this was true, but I know he was selected to move from the DC-10 lines to the KC-10 lines, and survived at least five layoffs there, so his quality of work had to be reasonably good).

      Unions work for some, but not for all. I'd rather stand on my own merits and get pay raises dictated by my performance than by a contract negotiated by someone who knows nothing about my job and the difficulty of it. I've never gotten a raise of less than 5%, which is more than most union contracts typically call for.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    77. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hallelujah!!!!!!!!!! Can I get an Amen Brother?

    78. Re:Result by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hopefully you are not tied down by a non-competition agreement with your current employer.

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    79. Re:Result by nxs212 · · Score: 1

      I am self-employed and I pay $500-something per year for this mandated Workers Compansation (disability /unemployment) insurance. All companies that have employees are required to have it. This insurance entitles me to collect, should I become disabled (on the job) or if my subcontractor or company that I work at decides to screw me over.
      However, If I quit on my own I shouldn't be entitled to any compensation. Saying that this money ($500) would go into my pocket is correct in MY case but hypothetical for others. My $500 that I would have saved would be taxed by Fed and state, so I wouldn't actually get the $500. More like $300. Same goes for big companies with thousands of employees. I think $300 is a small price to pay for this kind of insurance.
      How on earth did you come up with "The average employer pays about $1.35 to $1.50 per $1.00 that the employee receives"?
      According to your sentence, company would be paying $45k in taxes, benefits, insurance,etc. on top of $30k salary that a typical secretary makes. This is absolutely incorrect and not even close.75k total compensation? I don't think so.
      Perhaps you meant to say that 30% of employer's cost per employee goes to government, insurance ,etc. "$1.50 per $1.00" is 150% and not 30.

    80. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well duh!

    81. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      show me one CEO that took a paltry $50,000.00 a year cut in pay to save a worker's job.

      Hell show me one person in management that will stick up for his/ her employees.

      Ahhh, thought so.

      Yes you might have had to do the dirty job of letting someone go, but you still sleep at night. and I'm sure you didnt do everything in your power to find a way to keep that position.

      How about all of management take a 4% cut in pay so we can keep the engineering department fully staffed....

      Like hell you will. Damned if you'll be kept away from your BMW payment for some schmuk who actually works for his money.

      Bottom management is VERY different than management... you really are not in that "circle" and you would never slightly impact your luxury lifestyle to save a job of someone else.

    82. Re:Result by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      Six months of unemployment...

      You skipped a step.

      "Find a New Job" comes before "Take this job and shove it".

      ;-)

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    83. Re:Result by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes I have.

      My employees saw me mortgage my house to meet their payroll. They knew I was not taking any money from the business and that paying them was 1st.

      in the end they knew that I was rare and did care when I had to let 1/2 of them go, with a promise they know I would keep.... in the future when things get better they have a guarenteed job here. I'll bet 50 bucks you would never do that. I have yet to meet a manager that would. yes I owned the company, and yes I am rare in the fact that I fought tooth and nail to keep it alive instead of taking the cowards way out and sell to the competition for a tidy profit while flipping a big finger to my employees.

      Yes I have had to fire slackers... and I told them why. but I at least had the balls that all of the CEO's I have ever met dont. cut my pay to pay my workers, because THEY are making my money for me.

      any businessman or manager that does not know this is a very poor manager /owner.

      without all your employees.... you are out of business.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    84. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow I thought the Japanese still worked longer hours, but apparently we're number one now. Much to this guy's chagrin.

    85. Re:Result by Wildfox01 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. For one reason. When the russian programmer Dmitri was locked up for violating the DMCA as alledged by Adobe the owner of the company that Dmitri works for came here and helped him in court. Maybe in america the execs don't care about the employee's. But maybe else where in the world employee and employers take on different aspects.

    86. Re:Result by danbeck · · Score: 1
      I'm in the USA! The democracy where we're number one and we fight for our freedom, except for discussing personal rights or labor issues - heck that's commie talk.

      Why do people take the legitimate griefs of other people, blow them wildly out of proportion, and then use them as a straw-man arguments?

    87. Re:Result by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Americans work more hours at work than any other industrialized first world country.

      Actually you dont. There have been made surveys of this sort and the US didnt come out on top, but nice theory though..

    88. Re:Result by danbeck · · Score: 1

      I've never worked a job where you would be fired for being 1 minute late. I've never worked a job that didn't compensate me fairly.

      You know what though? If I did, I'd quit and go find another job. I'm a free man, you know.

      I bet you are too, unless you are part of a union. Then your hard earned money is taken from you and filtered out to tons of political causes you may or may not support and it goes towards a fat paycheck for the union boss over your area. You aren't free to work if your union calls a strike and you aren't free to be compensated any more than your fellow union members, no matter how much you bust your ass.

      Worse, if you want to work at certain companies, you aren't free to not be in the union. (Like for instance, a local grocery store in Canton, OH.)

      Personally, you can take any union job and shove it up the union bosses ass for all I'm concerned. I prefer to live a free man.

    89. Re:Result by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 1

      How on earth did you come up with "The average employer pays about $1.35 to $1.50 per $1.00 that the employee receives"?

      A typo, that's how. LOL. I should have said "for every" and not "per." As for the numbers though, I worked for a small company and that's how things were done there. I saw it and that is how I know.

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    90. Re:Result by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


      This is exactly what I think alot of people are missing here when they view employement.

      You owe them a good days work and they owe you a pay cheque. In two weeks either one of the parties can walk away, if they choose and
      regardless of what the other party wants.

      Its just work. Its not something political, not something of "us vs. them". Its not about a fight and what is "right". Its not about "screwing them hard" and its not about "getting screwed hard".

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    91. Re:Result by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      Now my motto, and I really believe it, is "do what you love and the money will follow..." to which I add, "live where you love living... and life will follow." Why live in an industrial hell hole when you can just move to your idea of the most beautiful part of the country and work out the trivial stuff like how exactly you make a living once you get there?

      Most people make a living in most places, after all.

      Since I don't have any real mod points, I'll have to settle for virtually modding you into orbit. Couldn't have said it better myself!
    92. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're looking at this from a worker's perspective. Which is fine, given the context of the /. question and post you were addressing.

      Loyality and business IF YOU ARE A WORKER and nothing more does not mix, you are absolutely correct. This may be a strange, thin line here, but really, workers are not really business entities unto themselves. They work on the same principles of businesses (pay for services/work) but are not in the end a business. You are not in business except for the paycheck for the work you do, not to profit beyond that or selling goods or services to a separate third-party. Again, the line may be difficult to see, but legally and conceptually it's not that hard to understand.

      As worker, you must look out for yourself, and to that end, I agree with you.

      But loyalty and business, true businesses, ARE ESSENTIAL. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a stupid idiot. I am not saying there will not be times where loyalty may have to be set aside for advancement of a company, but on an exec to exec or management to management or company to company level, it's absurd to think otherwise. Most of the fortune 500 companies are where they are because of loyalty to friends, relatives, alma maters, etc. Sure, there are plenty that fail, and these companies are the minority to all the companies that have collapsed, but loyalty is damn sure an essential, necessary element.

      It just may not and certainly understandably should not be the only requirement to be sufficient for business success.

    93. Re:Result by sayerofno · · Score: 1

      There's a line from Jerry Maguire - "It's not show-friends, it's show-business." The scene in the movie is the reverse situation as this thread (it's the "bad" guy that says it), but the sentiment is the same. If you have to leave a company, it's business, not personal.

    94. Re:Result by Loki+Godslayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The union ideal has its merits but one major flaw. Unions do not account for skill. They presume all members once achieving the working levels are equally skilled. This is far from the truth from programmers. It would hurt he group as a whole because those doing more work can not be compensated for it.

    95. Re:Result by suicidal · · Score: 1

      FYI...
      The United States is not a Democracy,
      it's a Republic.

      (...even says so in the Pledge of Allegiance)

    96. Re:Result by TrackDaddy · · Score: 1
      Yes, fine... there are some people working in every company that probably shouldn't be there. That still doesn't change the fact that loyalty does NOT exist in American business (or business in most other countries). It is a business relationship, pure and simple. I show up for work and do my job. I recieve compensation from my employer for doing said job. End of story.

      The fact of the matter is, there are exceptions to the rule... but you cannot, should not, under any circumstances assume that they will apply to you. If your boss, or his/her boss, or anyone else up the chain will gain something by canning you (bonus, keep their job, raise, etc) they will do it. Yes, they may feel bad about it. So what, you are still out of work and trying to pay your rent.

      Wake up, smell the hot beverage of your choice, and get deprogrammed from all the BS that you were taught in school. This is the real world ace and you had better figure out how it works. Cause right now... you are in serious denial.

      --
      Run! There's a lobster loose!
    97. Re:Result by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      Nice use of referenced facts to back up that assertion there, guy. Unfortunately, the post directly above yours pretty much proves you wrong.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    98. Re:Result by morpheus98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was in a situation once where "upper" management gave orders to lay off four members of my team. I didn't think it was fair, reasonable, or a good idea for the company and I let them know about it. I fought for three days to keep my staff. Ultimately, I was able to work out an arrangement where two people were put into an "early-retiremeny" program, and only one person had to be laid off. Contrary to popular beleif, having the responsibility of firing or laying someone off is a huge burden. Let me just say, that after this all went down I spent many hours helping this individual find a new job on my personal time. Not because I had to, because I felt obligated to help him out because of how many times he had helped me out at work in the past. You see, the employee-manager relationship is just like any human relationship. Employees who do the minimum amount will receive the minimum amount of payment, respect, favors, and growth opportunities. Employees who do everything they can, and actually care about the quality of their work, will receive the maximum amount of payment, respect, favors, and growth opportunities. The end result? I was promoted because I stuck to what I beleived in and wouldn't accept the status quo. My team saw the end result of my actions and worked much harder and had more synergy than ever afterwards, leading to very prosperous times. I will not hire employees now that have the "Im going to do the minimum amount of work" attitude. We only hire winners. At-leasters and losers can go on welfare or unemployment for all I care.

    99. Re:Result by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Walking off just to prove a point or to be pissy won't cut it.

      No, but if the company is telling you to do things that aren't in your job description, then the employers have voided their contract with you. IANAL but that ought to count for something as far as unemployment goes.

      Easier yet, just refuse to work 20 hours of unpaid overtime a week, and all the other unreasonable demands they make of you. Let them fire you. Let them fire you all.

    100. Re:Result by LookSharp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      i am paid to work 40 hours a week. thats what they get.

      Less smoke breaks, bathroom stops, lunch, tea time, cube-aisle conversations about the latest ballgame/hot vidcard/cute intern...

      ...and time spent surfing slashdot. :)

    101. Re:Result by 2names · · Score: 1
      Same thing happened at Maytag in Galesburg, IL.

      Go Unions!!

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    102. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Along those same lines, I worked for a game development company that made it a priority to secure as much money for the big wigs on top as possible. Actually producing good games came second, treating employees like humans came a distant third. Employees went through 60, 70, or 80 hour weeks to make a milestone, and then when they needed a day off to rest the week following the milestone, it was counted against their sick days/vacation time... which amounted to 10 days a year.

      To save money, they would only hire about 70% of the people actually needed for a project, pocket the diffrence on what the publisher payed the company to develop the game.... so who picked up the slack of the extra 30%? The employees of course. The code base for the engine was buggy and outdated, and management constatly insisted that things be done right away, rather than being done the right way. And for those of you who work on large projects you probably know what comes next... unmaintainable code.

      So, projects start going badly, because the complexity of games now is such that you can't afford to just 'hack it' anymore. And then the layoffs start... and the good people start getting laid off, because the company keeps people based on who has a personal relationship with those in manegment.

      So surprise surprise, the company is going under now. Pretty much anyone who actually knew how to do the job right has either been laid off, left the company, or stopped putting in 60 hour weeks.

      All these things are very pridictable in a company. Learn to see the signs early, because once you get caught in the 70 hour a week death cycle, you don't have the time or energy to seek out a new job.

      (posting aninymously b/c it's a small industry and no wants a rep for bashing a company, no matter how bad they screw their workers)

    103. Re:Result by spyderbyte23 · · Score: 1
      Worse, if you want to work at certain companies, you aren't free to not be in the union. (Like for instance, a local grocery store in Canton, OH.)
      This statement is a lie. Ohio is a "right-to-work" state, meaning that union membership may not be made a condition of employment.

      Unions and management may, by mutual agreement, require all that all employees' paychecks have union dues removed, but this is not the same as union membership. Also, note that it's the employer doing this to you -- not a union.

      The justification usually given for this is that all employees benefit from the union's bargaining, and should therefore pay. I don't happen to agree, but it's a contractual arrangement and it's legal as sea salt.

      --
      -- Support Ometz le-Serev.
    104. Re:Result by operagost · · Score: 1

      Would it have really hurt their egos that badly to have you back for one day as a "consultant" to access the data? I'm sure offering $50-60/hr, plus travel time, would have been a bargain for both parties.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    105. Re:Result by TrackDaddy · · Score: 1
      Um... you are new to the world of high-tech aren't you? Let's lay it down for him shall we folks.

      A. Most companies expect to be able to put their tech engineers on-call instead of hiring enough staff to do the job. And they will NOT compensate the staff for being on-call. In fact, high-tech lobbied VERY hard when the labor laws were recently being revamped so the tech workers were specifically excluded from recieving overtime/on-call benefits if they were salaried employees.

      B. 50+ hour work weeks. If you speak with a few managers here in siilly-con valley, they will tell you that anyone being hired for a senior position is "expected" to put in at least 60 hours a week. Minimum. And anyone puttin in less will be considered to be a "loafer". So, in short, the 40~ week is a myth in high tech. It doesn't exist.

      C. Legal grounds for unlawful termination suit (you are WRONG, btw) is a very different thing from being able to pursue and unlawful termination suit. First you'll need to find a lawyer to take your case. Unless they feel they can get at least $250K in settlement, they wont even consider it. Or, you'll need to hire a lawyer. You have $50-60K sitting around for legal fees don't you? Point is sparky, even if you have grounds for a suit, it aint gonna happen. You'll have the satisfaction of knowing you are right. But that won't keep your electricity turned on.

      I've interviewed w/ several employers while looking for a new job after 4 years with my present employer (they are shutting down their US operations) and I have been asked, in every interview, if I am one of those "8 to 5 types" and if I had any problems with being on-call. I guarantee you that if I answer yes to either question, that will be the last time they talk to me.

      --
      Run! There's a lobster loose!
    106. Re:Result by Urox · · Score: 1
      I'd rather stand on my own merits and get pay raises dictated by my performance

      And if your manager wants to save money, he'll say your performance was poor and you won't get that raise or promotion. And when you ask what it was that caused your bad performance, he can say that you didn't grow or learn enough. Like that can be quantified.

      --
      "Would you rather have a playstation addicted dork wearing a star wars t-shirt?"
    107. Re:Result by bb_referee · · Score: 1

      It may be a lie in Ohio, but it's not in Minnesota. Minnesota is not a right to work state. So, if you are a grocery bagger at the local supermarket, you will have to join the union. What does a union do for you at a supermarket...ensure you make $7.00 to 8.50 hourly to bag groceries? I am betting that you'd make the same $$ even if there was no union

      However, I also believe that unions have their place in certain jobs. For instance, like at Wal-Mart because of the examples listed above. I worked for Wal-Mart in college, and the corporation as a whole (fortunately, the managers at my store were not completely crazy) treats its employees like crap! Contrast this with Target, where I worked after I had worked at Wal-Mart, and it's a whole different feeling. Comparted to Wal-Mart, working at Target was actually rewarding.

      Just my $0.02!

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    108. Re:Result by 73 · · Score: 1

      IANALL, but generally, "Professionals" are exempted from the overtime provisions of the fair labor act. At least under US law.

      A real Labor Lawyer can correct me though

    109. Re:Result by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      It would hurt he group as a whole because those doing more work can not be compensated for it.

      Umm... No. Union minimums are just that - minimums. They set the floor at what someone can be paid - not the ceiling. In animation, the union minimum for a lead animator is about $1500 per week. Back in the mid-nineties, hotshots like Glenn Keane were reportedly signed to million-dollar personal contracts. Obviously, they recognized that he had superior talent and name power, and compensated accordingly.

      Do your research before joining up with a union - they're not all the same. In particular, look for one that knows technology and has already organized tech workers. If you're not convinced, keep in mind that many unions provide pension coverage and health benefits that are portable (think Actors Guild, and a host of many other entertainment unions).

      All it takes is enough people signing union rep cards, and the employer will be forced to negotiate by the Federal Board of Labor Relations. Given this bunch is already ready to walk out, unionization is a realistic alternative. The downside? Well, if you unionize, and are blacklisted as a union agitator, you might have trouble finding work elsewhere in the industry if they aren't unionized... That's why the union rep cards and unionization votes are supposed to be secret.

    110. Re:Result by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      $50 - $60 is crap pay for *nix consulting work. Factoring in the fact that you're the only person who knows where the data is and how to get it off, it's even worse. This would not be a time for charity.

      I would have asked for at least $200 per hour, with a minimum of 3 hours, plus however long it takes to clean out my own data to CD-R.

    111. Re:Result by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      That loot comes off a money tree, and it's delivered each morning by elves.

      It is a zero-sum deal, and when scofflaws take advantage of it, we all pay more.

    112. Re:Result by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's a matter of scale, that is largely dependent on how flat your organization is. My opinion is, if you're more than 2 levels away from upper management, the "chicken salad" comment does apply to those people in upper management laying off those people more than 2 levels below them. They don't know you, and they don't really know your boss either.

      A boss will hate seeing one of their people go. I've been there, and when management hands down the edict that 2 people from the dep't have to be let go in order to keep the budget balanced, one agonizes over those two people. But the boss's boss doesn't, although he has a sense of regret for the skills going out the door. The ones they do care about are those people who are highly-skilled, well-known in the company, and are leaving the company because of the massive layoffs. And those they try to buy back.

      If there are fewer than 50 people in your company, chances are good any layoffs will be an incredibly painful decision for management. If you have more than 500, it becomes more of a numbers game and far less of a "we rely on so-and-so so she can't go" issue.

      But corporate management culture is its own thing. The guy you're laying off today is going to be your boss or co-worker tomorrow. It's crazy how incestuous a culture corporate management is in many states. Most of them (I say "them" as a former manager who defected back to "pure tech" and intends to stay there) have a very "live and let live, don't hold grudges" attitude. Pragmatic and helpful for them, but the average Joe Worker generally isn't so aloof about his job.

      Of course, this is stereotyping and every person is different. But as a rule, I don't believe that, in general, upper management at large (>500 workers) corporations really care about the plight of their workers -- they care only about how the plight of their workers affects their bottom line.

    113. Re:Result by rbilli · · Score: 1

      I believe this is called 'working to rule'...

    114. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is it that geeks wouldn't recognize irony if it was pissing on them?

    115. Re:Result by snarfer · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. You can organize your union any way you want, and the union can negotiate any contract it can get with management.

    116. Re:Result by snarfer · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could have the alternative of NOT joining the union - and NOT accepting the higher pay, health innsurance, pension, vacations, sick pay, job protection and other things you get from having a union.

    117. Re:Result by moeymo · · Score: 1

      DO NOT SUE! This takes a great amount of time, money (unless you get paid a lot of cash, few lawyers will agree to work for a contingency fee), and emotional energy. Besides, future employers are very likely to find out about your past litigious behavior. Such people have a VERY difficult time getting hired. Companies aren't stupid; in this case, they know lightning may very well strike twice... Besides, we live in a country that is far too quick to sue. Suck it up! [directed at the people who suggested suing, not the original poster] If you don't like your job, quit and find a better one.

    118. Re:Result by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Correct, I was addressing the subject from a worker perspective. Still, I think you are treating all workers like mindless sheep. They aren't.

      Yes we are in for the paycheck. But some of us can understand the concept of having a paycheck next year or the year after. Some cannot. I was referring to the ones that can and that frankly I prefer to work with people who have the brain to fall into the "can" category.

      For example, in the past, I have taken a 20+k dollars (in another currency though) annual salary cut to see a light down the end of the tunnel different from the chapter 11 incoming train.

      By the time my notice period was over and I walked out of the door the management has scheduled 20+% of the personnel for a cull.I had no prior information that this was forthcoming. I just saw that with the current business practice something like this was bound to happen sooner or later. And frankly, I have a family to feed.

      So no, we are not interested in a pay check now. At least I am not. I am interested in a paycheck now and a paycheck next year at the same time por favor. And if the PHB cannot run the business to satisfy this elementary requirement there is no point to get loyalty involved. It aint going to work anyway.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    119. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow if you're sleeping at work I'm thinking it's probably because you have some kind of intense personal life, not that you're lazy.

    120. Re:Result by geekoid · · Score: 1

      see a lawyer. It definatly sounds illegal.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    121. Re:Result by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If he comapny has been violating the law and not giving you money that you earned, then you should SUE. Unless you ares tupid and say something to your new company, they will not find out.

      It is the only recourse the worker has agains abuse.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    122. Re:Result by longbottle · · Score: 1

      Can I please come work for you? I'm cheap.

      Email: longbottle@mail.com if you're interested... please, I need work.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it!
    123. Re:Result by robmered · · Score: 1
      Democracy and republic refer to completely different things. The former relates to the locus of legitmacy, the latter to the nature of the head of state. In short, a democracy is a form of government where legitimacy is derived from the people. A republic, democratic or not, is a nation-state whose head of state is not a monarch - usually a president.

      So, the US is a democratic republic (if one overlooks the sham presidential election of 2000 - bring in the Belgians!). Contrast this with a constitutional monarchy as we have in Australia - we are not a republic, since our head of state is a monarch (much to my chagrin and embarrasment), but our government is elected by the people, so we are a democracy.

      From Dictionary.com:
      Democracy :
      1. Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives.

      Republic :
      1. a) political order whose head of state is not a monarch and in modern times is usually a president.

    124. Re:Result by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Not really, even if the tables are turned, americans haven't always been on top, and it is therefore hard to attribute anything special to that fact, as the parent poster did.

    125. Re:Result by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Loyalty and business do not mix.
      this is the single most important thing that has ever been said on slashdot. . . .

      That may be the saddest thing ever posted on Slashdot. There was a time when companies and employees were loyal to each other, even in IT -- IBM and HP come to mind. Companies believed that they owed their success to their employees and did not offshore their jobs at the first quarter-point drop in stock price. CEOs made only two to three times the average worker's pay -- not three thousand times the average employee's wage. Companies believed they needed to give something back to the local communities that had allowed them to prosper. In return, employees felt loyalty to the companies that employed them.

      That trust was broken with today's employee-as-widget and offshore-the-HQ-and-jobs attitudes. I hope there is a special hell for the greedy, self-serving MBAs who are ruining not only the companies they *work for* and the country they live in but the lives of so many employees as well.

    126. Re:Result by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      "The union ideal has its merits but one major flaw. Unions do not account for skill. They presume all members once achieving the working levels are equally skilled."

      Nonsense. A union is what its members make it. The NBA has a players' union, but the top players make over 50 times the lowest-paid players.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    127. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, I'm sure Looking Glass would have been alive today if not for the Ion Eight. Or some LG fan would tell you so.

    128. Re:Result by spyderbyte23 · · Score: 1
      It may be a lie in Ohio, but it's not in Minnesota.
      The parent poster specified that he was talking about a grocery store in Canton, Ohio. (Probably Acme-Click.)
      --
      -- Support Ometz le-Serev.
    129. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could you give some reason for this attitude? afaik, most contract offers aren't for more than 6 months, and if he decides to live modestly enough that what he earns in these 6 months lasts for another 6 months it is none of your business to blacklist him for that.

      and please try this lowering the pay the day after the offer has been accepted., esp. with the justification you are offering. don't forget to let us know how the court case ended

    130. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so that's why Duke Nukem Forever is taking so long...

    131. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely. I was at a great company with boneheaded upper-management. A killer for a start-up. But after it fell through, I helped a couple of guys land a job at the place I made it to. And I made it there because the CTO of the previous company highly recommended me.

      If you are all good, you *should* be able to pick something up elsewhere.

      Currently, I'm back at school (where I should be, not working) and running my own little buidness to augment my skooling.

      (heh, spelling mistakes on purpose)

    132. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh..Thats a bit of a modern definition. Democaracy used to mean(And it some circles still does) a goverment were all desions of the goverment are made directly by the citizens.

      Constrast that with a Republic where citizens elect intermediarys to make desisions for them.

      Its an extra level of indirection.

    133. Re:Result by vuud · · Score: 1

      In connecticut that does not hold true once you are salaried. I called the state department of labor awhile back and they told me I was basically a slave now and had no protection against work hours, off hours coverage or anything. My recorse was to quit. Of course I did not, and three years later got laid off. Forget about any sort of loyalty. They wont have one for you..

    134. Re:Result by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      But when they call you back for a day YOU ARE A CONSULTENT yhaa now you can charge big buck$$

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    135. Re:Result by mwtown · · Score: 1
      As was mentioned before, unemployment only applies if you get fired, or do not leave on your own accord.
      Actually, in most (if not all) states, you do not qualify for unemployment if you are terminated due to a disciplinary action.

      Laid off? Great. Slacked off? Screwed.

      There is hope though. You can appeal and get a hearing. If it's a case (for instance) of getting fired because you refused to work more than 50 hours a week, you probably have a strong case in your favor, and they will overrule the exemption for you.

    136. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former Minnesota Union Bagboy, I can say that you are incorrect. The only thing forcing you to join a Union in MN is the potential ire of your leftist coworkers.

    137. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really did this then you deserve much praise. There are too few employers out there with the balls to do what you did. Maybe if there were more like you we wouldn't be in such a crappy economy right now. Bad managament skills are what's killing the business right now.

    138. Re:Result by HBI · · Score: 1

      $365 a week as of 1999 (last time I collected, month and a half)

      Of course I have kids. YMMV.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    139. Re:Result by kech · · Score: 1

      Actually the amount of unemployment varies but the max payout per week is $482 a week with checks being sent out every other week. So the "consultant", "professional" is not really compensated but a rash decision like walking out and collecting.

    140. Re:Result by hacker · · Score: 1
      Two things, if he's collecting unenployment, it means he didn't leave under his own accord. Secondly, it often happens that a person can't find a job that pays as much as unenployment. Why work a meanial job when you look for a better one and get paid as much or more doing it?

      Ahem, wrong. You can most-certainly get unemployment if you resign your job. You don't have to get fired or laid off to be granted unemployment.

      I resigned my job back in November of 2001, moved across the country in seek of work, found nothing, and decided to apply for California unemployment (where my "job" was prior to my resignation). I was granted unemployment, and I've been on it for a few months now. Without it, I wouldn't be able to eat or pay the bills.

      Why was I given unemployment, when I was the one who resigned? Because I joined the company with a specific set of skills, and after surviving 5 rounds of layoffs, 4 new CEOs in 2 years, and an entire gutting of the senior management team, the company changed directions into an area drastically different from the one I was hired to contribute to. I no longer had "Those" skills, I only had "These" skills. So I resigned.

      I've been out of work since, 573 days total as of this post. After sending out 400-500 resumes and making dozens upon dozens of phone calls, without so much as a single response back from anyone (email, phone or otherwise), you realize that it's not going to get better, and it's not you that sucks, it's the job market that sucks.

      If I were to get an offer for a job that paid less than unemployment (and I'm actually getting the max allowed by law, roughly $9.25/hour), I would have to turn it down, because accepting it negates my ability to retain my unemployment benefits, should that job not work out in a week or two. That's just the way it works, and unfortunately, there are a LOT of developer jobs hiring people at $8.00 and $9.00/hr now, because they think they can just pick from the barrel of the other 8% of us who are unemployed.

      Just because we're out of work, doesn't mean we're whores.

    141. Re:Result by leeet · · Score: 1

      Wasn't this recently updated? Like a few weeks/months ago?? I thought the old act dated from the 30's

      --
      -- Leeeter than leet
    142. Re:Result by collind109 · · Score: 1

      As a former manager who has had to lay someone off and has even taken a paycut themselves to prevent having to lay someone off, I can say this: companies are out to make money. we know this. not all managers are evaluating your skills vs. chicken salad. some managers were workers once and still remember the "us against the company" philosophy. that's why i left management. I care for people, not companies!

    143. Re:Result by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was with the CWA for a year myself while I worked at AT&T. Hell, I had a steward in my training class. She was a cynical woman, and rightfully so-- her predictions of doom all came to pass with the company trying to shaft us within weeks of training's having begun. (Or, to those who weren't new to the company, the next wave of them trying to shaft us. :P These cycles of them pulling shit were pretty frequent.)

      The CWA definitely saved our collective asses several times during the whole thing, but they weren't present when they decided to lay a whole bunch of us off one day, thirty each fifteen minutes, after a year.

      Lesson? Don't expect the union to catch everything, but having one can sure as hell be a lifesaver.

    144. Re:Result by budgenator · · Score: 1

      just refuse to work 20 hours of unpaid overtime a week, and all the other unreasonable demands they make of you. Let them fire you.

      I've seen in other fields where an employer wants an employee gone, but doesn't want to fire him and pay the extra in unemployment isnsurance premiums; and the employee wants to leave, but doesn't want to give up the unemployment check by quitting, so they would rather be fired. This quickly degenerates into a kind of Sado-Masochistic ritual where each constantly provokes the other with increasing intensity. After a while the whole work environment is tainted, because the employers and the employee quickly become the laughingstocks arround the water-cooler and everbody has lost any respect that they might have had for anyone.

      The next step is of course for the employer to start looking for the next piece of deadwood to prune, and the employees start back-stabbing each other, to avoid being the next target. Of course I've gotten the feeling that, that is either happening or will quickly be the next step.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    145. Re:Result by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Yes and if every Russian had the integrety and compassion of Dmitri's employer's; the Soviet Union would still be a worker's paradise. Perhaps that's why the example stands out so clearly, it's very exceptional.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    146. Re:Result by sICE · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the support. I though I'd get replies like these when I read the preview of my post but there was no troll intended, I should perhaps have mentioned that contract work in fact get twice more money, as you did, and that we also have to pay more 'taxes' for that.

      sice

    147. Re:Result by nakedking · · Score: 1

      In 1908 happened what later became known (and forgotten, I guess) as "Italian strike". Railroad workers in Italy started doing everything they had to in the strictest accord with their briefings. Railroad quickly came to a halt.

    148. Re:Result by taphu · · Score: 1

      What is the world comming to? The word "unemployment" does NOT mean "collecting unemployment reliefe funds from the government". It means a state of not being employed. It scares me that so many people automatically equate unemployment with free money (because, as we all know, slashdotters are die hard communists ). Actually, come to think of it, it's even more scarry that that is actually what he meant.

    149. Re:Result by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      There are ways to make sure that other people know how skilled I am, helping to protect me. It's politics, and I hate to play them, but I've survived cuts before because of it -- including one that saw my manager cut. I also save virtually every e-mail I have, which provides a paper trail of sorts.

      It's not perfect, no, but I can't stand slackers who don't pull their own weight. I'll take my chances.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    150. Re:Result by Wildfox01 · · Score: 1

      I am not agueing about the fall of the USSR or it's reasons why. But Dmitri and his boss show a shining example of what american employers should be.

    151. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I'm a manager of a small software development group (5 employees under me), and my team rarely works overtime (as in, probably three or four weeks per year do they have to work more than 40 hours). My senior managment is very happy with realistic deadlines and steady progress, rather than heroic effort and spectacular failure.

    152. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as someone who's just been laid off (last Wednesday) I can testify to the fact that the manager who notified me did indeed regret what he 'had to' do to me along with quite a few others. I felt like telling him to cheer up. I understand that a lay off off is not a pleasant experience for either party, though be aware that it's far worse for the ex-employee than the company.

      But someone somewhere makes the decision to lay people off, and nowadays such decisions are often entirely unnecessary. The company that's just laid me off has got - literally - billions of dollars in the bank. And they've laid me and a lot of others off. The person that made the decision to lay me off has so much money, that they themselves wouldn't need to worry if they never worked again.

      But the way the system works - and here I'm talking about the capitalist system most of us are under - such decisions get made, and they have very direct and real consequences on ordinary people. In fact, the system compels people high up to make those decisions. If they didn't do it, they wouldn't occupy their position for very long, they'd be fired, someone else would move in, and so it goes on. So the people that make it to or near the top, are those that have the ability to make such ruthless decisions as laying people off when the company has billions in the bank. This is partly what you're referring to when you say, "A good businessman will be willing to make hard decisions, but that doesn't mean he will have no feelings of regret."

      If things are to change - and I believe they must, not just for the benefit of those of us relatively privileged people in the Western world who face difficult-but-relatively-trivial problems like lay-offs - but for those who work in sweatshops, third world countries, etc., the system has to be changed. In fact, the way things are going, this may be a pre-requisite to the survival of the human race. It's not an exagerration to say that our future as a species is shakey. (Think this is crap? Spend some time looking into the effects of global warming, or biological weapons, or nukes, and consider how close we've come to global anhilation in the past - i.e. one word away from it, "The most dangerous moment in history", during the Cuban missile crisis.)

      How the hell do you change the system?

      The way anything changes is by mass popular movement (not necessarily revolution OK?). This is what brought about the end of slavery, voting rights for women, equal rights for non-whites, and democracy itself, to name a few things. For that to happen, we all need to play a part, and that means you and me.

      What do you put in place of the current system? Well that isn't too clear at the current time, though there are plenty of ideas milling around, and plenty of people thinking about this. For one thing, democracy needs to play a big part. So workplaces should be democratically run, not top down, in a tyrannical manner, as things currently stand.

      There's plenty of material out there. ZNet is a reasonable place to start, and try reading "Understanding Power" by Noam Chomsky if you're interested in this stuff. Also, see the Ackbar/Wintonick documentary "Manufacturing Consent" for a good intro.

      Anyway, the earlier poster's point, "Loyalty and business do not mix." stands.

    153. Re:Result by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

      Why would we WANT to change the system. Yes, people have uncertainty in their jobs. I would not be surprised if there was another round of layoffs in my company tommorow. But that is an artifact of our fast changing world. As things change, the optimum job that people should be in changes.

      We have two options, to change the current system. One would be to slow down the rate of development in our world. I don't know about you, but I would HATE to live in a world where R&D was greatly curtailed and where the barrier to developing new products, processes, or other ideas was very, very high. I don't want to see the development of the next "automobile" squashed because it would put buggywhip makers out of work. I want that automobile, and let the buggywhip makers find a new product to make.

      The other method (though the drag on progress would eventually be the same) would be to have massive jobs programs. We pay people to work even if the product isn't needed. I think that would suck, too. We only have a finite number of people, and the more we pay to spend their effort and/or creativity doing "make work", then the less people will be out there making the useful stuff we all need or want. And that means useful stuff will be harder and harder to come by. Sure, we could have someone (like the gov't) pay the buggy whip makers to keep making buggy whips and they wouldn't have to go through the horrible trama of looking for new work. But think of all the new or cheaper S&M toys or other quality leather goods that are not being made because we are wasting the talents of the subsidesed buggywhip makers on something usesless*.

      Oh, but you say, your "democratically run" rather than "top down" business model offers a third way by avoiding the tyranny of the heartless blah blah blah. No it doesn't. So what if your buggywhip organization is owned by the workers rather than Mr. Buggywhip. That doesn't matter. Either one of two things can happen. One, they vote to get out of the buggywhip business, downsize and move into the premium retro buggywhip business, or some other similar drastic move that is in tune with the needs of the new automobile driving world. In that case they continue to succeed, BUT at the cost of forcing people to change jobs. Maybe some people would take comfort in the fact that their job was voted out of existence by astute co-workers who were doing the best for the organization rather than a small group of analysists but the end result is the same. People are forced to change so the organization continues. The second path that could be taken is that the workers vote to all keep their jobs and to keep doing the same thing. That saves their jobs only for a short while. Then the company goes out of business because no one is buying their product, and they have a warehouse full of buggywhips that they can't sell. A more efficient or agile organization buys up the buggywhip company's production equipment at auction and puts it to better use. All the former employees of the buggywhip company now have to go and get new jobs doing something that is more valuable to the world than making an obsolete and unwanted product. It doesn't matter that the workers voted to keep making buggywhips until they can all retire, because it is NOT the evil capitalist decision makers that are the tyrants of the economy. It is the invisible hand that is the ultimate tyrant. And thank God for that invisible hand or else we would all be riding around in horsedrawn carriages listening to 8 track tapes if it weren't out there weeding out bad products and inefficient organizations. If you don't like the invisible hand, then perhaps you should start listening to more 8 track tapes because YOU are the invisible hand.

      Of course any real decision the organization makes will probably be a compromise between the two extremes, but at the elemental level it is always the same decision: accept some inefficiency by employing someone in an uneeded or less than optimum job and increase the r

    154. Re:Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? Try non-factual. Theres no way my corporation would start paying me more if they were allowed to quit paying un-employment. More money would go to the stock holders, or the CEO's already ludicrous salary. They only pay what they have to, to keep me from quitting.

  2. as good as it sound.... by sweeney37 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On a comedy special years ago, Bill Cosby quoted parents telling kids, "I brought you into this world, I can take you out, and I can make another one that looks just like you."

    With today's job market I'm afraid the company will just replace you with people that are hungry for work.

    I could be wrong, but I've always lived by the mantra "better safe, than sorry."

    Mike

    1. Re:as good as it sound.... by bigox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is a good point. Unless your work is very specialized, you are easily replaced. And, you would be replaced with cheaper labor too. On top of that, you will most likely take a pay cut in your next job--that is if you even get another one. Just a couple of things to keep in mind.

    2. Re:as good as it sound.... by botzi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      With today's job market I'm afraid the company will just replace you with people that are hungry for work.

      Which isn't always so obvious.
      The fact that the job market is low, and there's a bunch of unemployed specialists, doesn't meen that there'is a bunch of *good*, hard-working, unemployed specialists.
      And if the staff that quits is a good one, the replacement will be difficult(if not impossible) to do.

      Anyway, yes a company may replace _anybody_ within a week or so, but in the futur it may loose a lot... an awful lot.;o))

      --
      1. No sig. 2. ???? 3. Profit!!!
    3. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replacing 50-60 walkouts isn't that easy!
      You need to train them? Leanring curves?
      Yes you can replace them but it would take months.
      The company would end up losing more money in just the costs to bring the new group up to speed...

    4. Re:as good as it sound.... by utahjazz · · Score: 5, Funny

      the company will just replace you with people that are hungry for work.

      And the new guys will look at your code (or whatever you do) and say, "Man this is a mess. Where do I begin refactoring? I'm going to have to re-write this whole thing! How did you people ever put up with those losers? [language1]? Who uses [language1] anymore? We'll rewrite the whole thing in [language2]. You guys are so lucky those wankers quit!".

    5. Re:as good as it sound.... by oZZoZZ · · Score: 1

      Sounds like what I said when I started here in November, cept our accounting software was written in basic, and ran in dos only, using direct betrieve database queries (not sql), and required batch files to be run from "z:" Drive, and everyone to have the same account on our NT 4 domain.

      That solution was fine when we had 1 or two office staff, now at 50 staff, we required something a little better.
      EZ>

    6. Re:as good as it sound.... by Kintanon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who trains the new people? If the entire department just walks you've got a whole shitload of untrained employees coming in who know nothing about the old setup or systems. It will take them months to get up to speed.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    7. Re:as good as it sound.... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      its called a union.

      its called a strike.

      get a pair of balls boy.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    8. Re:as good as it sound.... by DaRat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've seen a variant of this where the company replaces the development team every 12-24 months and each successive team says the "man this is a mess. I can't see why they used this design, we need to start over." At last note, the company still doesn't have a working product or a firm customer...

    9. Re:as good as it sound.... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

      This is a prefect example as to why you NEVER comment your code. If the company fires or lays your off, all they'll be able to do with your code is compile it.

    10. Re:as good as it sound.... by ph1ll · · Score: 1

      Why not?

      Management teams do this all the time and nobody questions it.

      I wish you the best of luck.

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    11. Re:as good as it sound.... by sjwt · · Score: 1

      he is not talking about one person,
      but rather a whole department..

      probly upwards of 30 years working
      at that company, working out who can
      help you solve problem X, which company
      creates problem Y and how doing Z makes
      an extra %5 profit over all..

      any one member of a well oiled team
      can drop out and be replaced by others
      pitching in to make up for the slight
      loss, but to replace a whole team is
      extreamly costly, you dont want to
      brake that chain so to speek.

      Hell, im only a Dishpig(kitchen hand)
      but ive been doing it for 8 years in
      the one company, not even the ppl who
      have worked with me for that time can
      keep up with me, just as i cant do there
      job at 100%..

      If i need time off, its a little bit of
      trouble, everyone pitches in and they get
      though the day, wiht the wages for that
      day being 130%..

      same with most of the other long term staff,
      theres 5 of us in total who have been there
      longer then 5 years..

      but if we all go out in one go, it would be
      chaos.. its at a state where 2 of us cant have
      the same day off as it costs the company too
      much to replace us

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    12. Re:as good as it sound.... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      its called a strike fucknozzle, and if IT people would realize that they are NOT the owners, and that they ARE LABOR, and stand together, we would make some progress in fair treatment.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    13. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you could beat your bosses to the punch. You may just want to leave so it is on your own terms, not on the company's terms.

      Although, I would consider quitting a last resort. First I would try to organize my fellow grunts and negotiate with management collectively. For some managers "deep financial shit" means lower profit not in the red. And they would not bat an eye to put a few grunts on the street to raise the stock a few cents. Heck, they are doing it already. Eliminating senior level personnel to hire a college grad to do the same job at a lower salary. And not because they are in debt, but because they didn't meet their profit targets.

      When the economy is great, labor/managment relationships are good, but when things get bleak it's a dog eat dog world. And let's face the facts, grunts are "replaceable" as long as we are divided. However if you stand together, then that is a force to reckon with.

    14. Re:as good as it sound.... by daBum · · Score: 1

      And, if your work is very specialized, you may have trouble finding a position afterwards utilizing the same skills for the same (or better) $$. A basket company may have a need for a left-handeed underwater basket weaver, but a waste basket company wouldn't.

      --
      I am dyslexia of borg - your ass will be laminated.
    15. Re:as good as it sound.... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Here goes:
      1. Hack into bosses account
      2. Use his account to /surf/apply on/ job boards
      3. He's fired
      Results:
      1. You've got leads to better jobs
      2. Previous boss no longer there to give you a bad reference
      3. You have time to get out of sinking ship (always better to look for a job while you still have one)
      If you stay until the bitter end, you WILL regret it.
    16. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yassuh Massah, Suh!

    17. Re:as good as it sound.... by Coward+the+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      This is a prefect example as to why you NEVER comment your code. If the company fires or lays your off, all they'll be able to do with your code is compile it.

      If you do it right, they won't even be able to do that without a seriously complex and cryptic make file that breaks everytime you look at it the wrong way.

      --
      -- Jason
    18. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Actually, they won't even be able to do that if you make sure there are some obscure fatal errors in it. (You of course fix these error in a temporary file before you compile the program.)

    19. Re:as good as it sound.... by NickFitz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, I really want to meet their investors :-)

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    20. Re:as good as it sound.... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Hell, never let them have the source. Well, not the REAL source anyway...

    21. Re:as good as it sound.... by msuzio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who cares how or if they replace you? You're leaving. Unless this is some sort of bluff to make the company cave in, you could care fsck all what they do after you leave. In my experience, what they do is get screwed over *hard*. Oh, they'll cope, they'll survive, but this is what will happen:

      Scenario 1: Some of you leave, but not all
      Result: The pressure mounts on the remaining folks, and now the pressure *must* cascade above and below, because if you're straining now, after you leave the others will be even more stressed. So now management starts to feel some of the heat, and other departments get wind of this poor situation too...

      So, now even more people are getting pressured, stuff starts dropping off the table, and either the company figures out how to relieve the stress or in time they lose even more employees. Even if people don't quit, I've seen many 'sit-ins' at work where people just come in and screw off because they don't care anymore. End result, company is screwed if they are in any sort of competitive field, because they've been forced to sit on their ass dealing with internal IT issues while the competition gets stuff done

      Scenario 2: You *all* leave (perhaps to a competitor if your non-competes don't interfere, and much of the time they don't hold water)
      Result: As above, but worse. They can hire replacements right away, but even brilliant people in a new environment have some ramp-up time. Plus, if *any* of the previous people remain, these new people are going to be disheartened pretty quickly... the new folks won't quit (they need the job), but are they going to work with a song in their heart and their full mental powers engaged? Not likely. So the company either stagnates or continues to fall.

      I've seen it happen *a lot*. Both my previous job, and to a certain extent my current position went through this. In my current job, we pulled back from the brink, made the best of a bad situation, and got management to (somewhat) "fix" things. We still went from 22 people to 4 people in my 'group', but we also changed the expectations and plans we had, and now my job is relatively stress-free.

    22. Re:as good as it sound.... by Glock27 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is a prefect example as to why you NEVER comment your code.

      I don't know where you (or the others posting in this thread) have worked, but in most positions I've had there have been code reviews.

      If your code isn't clear, much less well-commented, you get to fix it. If you just plain can't do it, you're out.

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    23. Re:as good as it sound.... by forgoil · · Score: 1

      Why? Sounds like they won't have any more money soon ;)

    24. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say this like most companies care about that stuff - if it gets to a pissing match with your superiors, you will be on the street.

      And their superiors will understand since it is they who are getting the huge bonuses for cutting costs...and they have a golden parachute should anything go wrong.

      If you are going to do something like this, do it because you are sick and tired of the job and don't care if you lose it.

      Having another job in your back pocket works wonders for that not caring...find time to job search while you are "working" those 60 hours...

    25. Re:as good as it sound.... by dylan_- · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ahh...obviously you're an insider, so perhaps you can tell us; when will Duke Nukem Forever be released?

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    26. Re:as good as it sound.... by hype7 · · Score: 3, Funny

      where's the humour in these threads?!?

      You know what I'd do? I'd get up on the back of a truck, and do a Presidential Speech a la the one done in Independence Day: "Today... we celebrate... INDEPENDENCE DAY"

      -- james
      ps Am I the only one that thinks that speech was the only decent part of that movie?

    27. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will take them months to get up to speed.

      Or they'll just reimplement the old system quickly by learning the errors in the old setup by doing 80 hour weeks the first two months and then have 30 hour weeks after that.

    28. Re:as good as it sound.... by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      It's not that simple; you lose all the training that the person you fire had, and you have to invest MORE to bring his/her replacement up to speed.

      Any company that loses a good percentage of its workforce is crippled. Sometimes permanently. Simple.

      The old "you can be replaced" scare-tactic only applies to jobs that can be done by a (dumb) robot, and how many I.T. jobs are like that?
      None.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    29. Re:as good as it sound.... by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      This is why we have code obfuscators for every language known to man.

      One button click and variables are renamed and reused, comments are removed, line breaks (if not needed by the language) are abolished, whitespace is decimated, class names can be changed... I've even seen some that ported the code to another language altogether...

      So you have your code for the code review, but if things get bad, you also have the button that ensures teeth gnashing is a common sound after you leave.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    30. Re:as good as it sound.... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Heh. They'll never replace me with someone cheaper. =P

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    31. Re:as good as it sound.... by red_gnom · · Score: 1


      This is why we have code obfuscators for every language known to man.

      So you have your code for the code review, but if things get bad, you also have the button that ensures teeth gnashing is a common sound after you leave.


      Sounds nice, but have you heard about things called "source control" and "backup".

    32. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The comedy special in question was "Bill Cosby: Himself" and it was a one-man show, basically a monologue. Its a good 15-20 years old, and a very funny line.

    33. Re:as good as it sound.... by router · · Score: 1

      I liked data in Area 51 too. And the money shot.

      andy

    34. Re:as good as it sound.... by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We had a guy who put time limits on all his code. I can't recall his exact method (I wasn't the one who discovered it), but it this case, it was simple to figure out and remove, but is was basically something hidden in an innocuous winsock API call that:

      a. Checked the day's date
      b. If Today() greater than xVarDateInHex then
      - Figuartively roll 20 sided die
      - If date less than roll then end
      End if

      It was pretty obvious because the call was something like winsock.0pen where the "0" in "0pen" was a zero (which didn't compile because it was a function call that started with a number, which is how we found it).

      If this would have worked, the program would have seemed to abort abnormally with no error call, but would work better and better as the month went on, until it always seemed to work from the 20th onwards... only to stop working on the 1st of the next month, then repeat the cycle. Very hard to troubleshoot. If it would have worked.
      _________________________________________ _________ _
      www.punkwalrus.com - What hath God wrought?

    35. Re:as good as it sound.... by Glock27 · · Score: 2, Funny
      So you have your code for the code review, but if things get bad, you also have the button that ensures teeth gnashing is a common sound after you leave.

      Other common sounds might be 1) scratching sounds as you write checks to your lawyer defending yourself in court and b) the click of the phone hanging up after you're told you weren't hired, due to a terrible reference.

      Good luck!

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    36. Re:as good as it sound.... by DaRat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd love to, but they'd realize that it's been over 12 months and just replace the team again if I did.

    37. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and b) the click of the phone hanging up after you're told you weren't hired, due to a terrible reference.

      Actually, if a potential employer contacts your former employer to get a reference, the worst the former employer can say is that yes you were employed by his company, and you worked from this date to that date.

      He can write you a bad reference letter, but he has to give it to you, and you can read it before you give it to any potential employer.

      Anything else is illegal blacklisting/slander.

    38. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still went from 22 people to 4 people in my 'group', but we also changed the expectations and plans we had, and now my job is relatively stress-free.

      I don't know if this applies to your case, but going
      from 22 people to 4 will relieve a lot of stress for
      sure.

      Most of those 22 people were probably very busy
      trying to look busy, and constantly interrupting
      some of the other 20+ people with their urgent
      tasks, etc. Nobody gets anything done that way.

      With only 4 people, it's a lot harder to have a fiefdom with long running arguments and animosity to the other people in the group.

      Also, all the petty differences look very stupid when there are just 4 people to deal with. When there are dozens of members, a small misunderstanding can grow way out of control and turn into a feud.

    39. Re:as good as it sound.... by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      One button click and variables are renamed and reused, comments are removed, line breaks (if not needed by the language) are abolished, whitespace is decimated, class names can be changed... I've even seen some that ported the code to another language altogether...

      So you have your code for the code review, but if things get bad, you also have the button that ensures teeth gnashing is a common sound after you leave.


      What is this? Amateur hour?

      A Professional software developer wouldn't dream of doing such a thing. Because they're a professional.

      Learn the difference.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    40. Re:as good as it sound.... by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      You are *so* right... That is exactly why I spent so long detailing in the post exactly how professional this sort of practice is, and how it is expected behavior of programmers at any fortune 500 company.

      Sheesh.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    41. Re:as good as it sound.... by haystor · · Score: 1

      I don't know where these ideas came from, but they just aren't true. Any former employer can tell the truth about you if asked. There are no laws protecting you against the truth. Most employers may have a policy like you describe but its only to avoid all lawsuits (even the ones they would win.)

      --
      t
    42. Re:as good as it sound.... by msuzio · · Score: 1

      I can't really comment on this on a personal level... many of those people are still my friends :-).

      *However*, on an organizational level -- yes, this is very true. I have found I can do more with less in some cases. Our previous group was far too big, and our previous project way too ambitious. We've shrunk expectations, and actually found we have a better product because we've had to be much more focused.

      So, your points are fairly accurate :-).

    43. Re:as good as it sound.... by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      I liked the movie. It wasn't anything terribly spectacular but it was still well written, cast, and played out. You can always improve things. This was still a decent movie. Oh, and that speech rocked. It's one of my favorite inspirational speechs of all time. I'd like to see someone compile a list of speeches like that and vote on which was the best. I have that DVD. I think I'll go watch it again. :)

    44. Re:as good as it sound.... by Confessed+Geek · · Score: 1


      The answer is to go talk to the local unions and see if your work can qualify as falling under one of their banners. Don't turn up your nose, but you might be able to join the secretarial union.

      Unions are not a 4 letter word. The last time power was heavily consolidating in the hands of the few and workers were being treated as a low value replaceable commodity Unions were the savior of the American middle class.

      What the original poster is talking about is a strike. If you are going to get organized and go on strike, talk to the folks who really know how to do it, and get the legal protections that are due a real union.

      Be aware though, that this is a dangerous path. A lot of folks have mentioned the trouble you can get into if you get blackballed as a troublemaker. Well there is NOTHING you could do that will get you blackballed quicker than being a union organizer. Management LIKES the fact that all the anti-union propaganda is being eaten up by the new generation of tech workers. Because it gives them power and takes it away from you. Anyone who threatens that will have to watch their back.

      Unionizing is not just something our parents did. Its something we can do too, and as the respect for human labor decreases it is something to give some thought to.

    45. Re:as good as it sound.... by Crystal+Samurai · · Score: 1

      Not always so. If both the original coder, and the new coder know what they are doing. I've left code behind with a proper structure and explanations and poepel had no trouble with it.

      The problem is that mediocre code tends to be just barely maintanable for the person who wrote it, and VERY hard for a new person.

      I have experianced it both ways, and there is a noticable diffrence. I also happened to have talked to the original codders in both cases... one was well trained and well read... the other had a little training and did NOT read anything on the subject of coding. He had pleanty of years to code, but never had planning or orginization in it. It was impossible to deal with his code. It was full of bugs even when no one else was touching it. It had no interface funcitons it was just random collections of 500 line functions filled with special case exceptions. I suppose it provides job security, because no one but the original author can touch it, so thats why this type of coding practice survives... it pulls a company down into the gutter though.

      Learn to write code and manage bugs well, and this stuff doesn't happen. Read Code Complete by Steve MacConnel (Is that spelled right?) It will change your life for the better. Keep a copy by your nightstand. Read it frequently. If you are a programmer, it should be your bible. As Moses was to the children of Israel, so is Steve MacConnel to us. He speaks the one inalterable truth... well you get the idea.

    46. Re:as good as it sound.... by egork · · Score: 1

      Who cares how or if they replace you? You're leaving. Unless this is some sort of bluff to make the company cave in

      Yeah! Here should have been a full stop.

      Now the new sentence starts: is there a some sort of bluff to make the company cave in?

      I do not think so. My scenario - company will let you go, will bring in consultants and fire your boss after or even before the consulting team finaly gets on track. Than they will start looking for new permanent employees.

      I do not think it will bring much to you, you will be out anyway by then.

    47. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am curious to know what happened? If I would be the boss, I would hire a consultant as a witness, built a stack of proof, then fire the guy making it clear that if we loose any business because of that problem he would pay in court! So he might as well make sure ghis tricks where all caught. And PLEASE put me as a reference ....

    48. Re:as good as it sound.... by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      Problem is, people are stupid. Management is twice as stupid. They do not care if your replacements can't do the job, will do it slower than you, and eat up X dollars in training.

      Instead you might want to go to them and spell it out for them that in order to save money they have simply asked people to do more work for no extra compensation. Spell it out how much money you are saving the company by doing that work. And make it clear how much work is going to suffer if they continually put unrealistic goals on a group. They'll tell you to be a team player. You tell them the star pitcher doesn't pitch the whole game by himself. You need to show them in detail that they are either not going to save any money with their stupid new ideas about how to run the department or if they really are going to save a ton of money, that they had better start compensating the people that are saving them the money (ie workers, not management).

      If none of that works, you are in deep. You can go over their heads and try to get a meeting with the board. Make a very professional presentation to the president. If you get on good terms with the board or president over this you'll have some protection, but either way, if you go over the heads of immediate management they will be out for blood.

      Same situation if you sue for back compensation.

      Basically, you had better start looking for another job. When you leave give your resignation to someone above the short sighted managers immediately above you. List your reasons and make it clear that management was not only dooming you to failure, but the department and the company overall. Try leaving stuff in a situation that the managers over your managers will have to hire you back as consultants just to explain how everything works. And no, it's not your job to train your replacements. If they don't have any idea, then that's managements job. If management doesn't know what's going on...too bad for them.

      Personally, I think until you find that better job that you'd do well to slow down and stop working overtime. If they need you to start coming in X hours of overtime a week ask them to put it in writing and a reason why. Remember that if there are not enough people around to get the job done that it is managements fault, not yours.

    49. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMEN !!!

      I can't believe the stupid posts I read here. Are all /. "penguin" types that mean and unprofessional? It's like high school hour here.

      I am a lot less surprised that so many managers have no respect for coders after the .COM years. Yes there is a lot of abuse from management since 2001, but thatâ(TM)s after the coders abused for at least 6 years.

      But with unprofessional comments like destroying code? They paid for it, you agreed to the deal when you did it. Why donâ(TM)t you just not try to renegotiate or leave?

      And hey! Even if the job sucks right now, bosses are abusive morons, I donâ(TM)t know a coder in LA doing less than 50K. Whining babies.

      Itâ(TM)s like this guy at work with 95K tells me he never submit the latest working code, and keeps the 'real' version on his laptop! Ready to delete everything if he gets fired. A lead that have full confidence of the managers (no code review, they canâ(TM)t read code). All that because at his last review he wanted 10% of the company in stock and did not get it!!!! The investors placed over 15M in 5 years, his only investment was about 50 hours a week he put in the project for 1.5 years, the bosses never even asked for more than 40 (until he start complaining about how much time HE was the only putting in).

    50. Re:as good as it sound.... by dynoman7 · · Score: 1

      (Pssst...these guys are government contractors that they are talking about...you ARE the investor)

      --
      Blarf.
    51. Re:as good as it sound.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one that thinks that speech was the only decent part of that movie?

      Yes, you are the only one. The truth is, there is no decent part of that movie.

    52. Re:as good as it sound.... by quasarc · · Score: 1

      I guess it all depends what you are after. Four friends and I worked in IT hell for a good number of years, but it took the Y2K crunch to tell me how rare and valuable (read: sucker) we were.

      At a meeting over beer, we realized that the company would just replace us if we tipped our hand or played it straight. No benefit to my coworkers or clients, no learning experience to management, no wicked smile in the mirror. So... I planned our departure for a bit.

      That UNIX training I was begging them to give to my coworkers? I quit begging. All our production code (non-approved but used anyway) migrated to my home directory... etc. One by one we left. I left last of all of us. "turned out the lights" so to speak. When my D-day came I reminded management of their security responsibilities since I had root on nearly all machines, and I was known to be a card carrying member of se2600 (local hacker community).

      Pursuant to a procedure written by the Internal Security Auditor (one of 22 hats I had) he killed all logins and directories I had, including the ones containing scripts used in production.

      Results? Late production (to the tune of 3-4 weeks instead of 24 hours) and a loss of 85% of the clients my department served. Most of us went on to work in other simular shops, while I opened my own PC repair biz and doubled my income.

      My ass was covered here for a few reasons.
      1. I was not a programmer, therefore could not write production code.
      2. None of my scripts were in the procedure manual. The hand scrawled notes that explained how to use them was in my bosses hand.
      3. The Ops foks were lazy. If there was a simpler way, not only did they use it, they never leared from it, and soon forgot the old way.
      4. No documented company property was destroyed.

      I will not specify company nor industry, but for those that know: NEO for life, baby!

  3. I would do it by tuluvas · · Score: 1

    I would walk out with out a second thought, if you and your co workers where intelligent enough to get a job like that in the first place, you can get another one that does not treat you like shit.

    1. Re:I would do it by GMontag · · Score: 1

      The only times I have seen anything close to this (it has been YEARS, actually, almost decades), there was always some little snott that blabbed the plan OR everybody nodded and agreed then some did not walk.

      Also, getting fired in many places gets you 0 unemployment benefits, so do most forms of resignation.

      YUBMV

    2. Re:I would do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only it was as easy as you make it sound. I know plenty of VERY keen tech folks with lots of experience and great people skills who were jobless for many months after either leaving voluntarily or being layed off. Depends what country, and what part of that country, the person is in, I guess.

      Also depends on what kind of dependants you have. If I was supporting a wife and a kid, for example, I imagine I'd put up with an awful lot before cutting off that income.

    3. Re:I would do it by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      other way around in the UK. If you resign you get no unemployment benefit for 6 months, but if you are fired you can get benfit in 2 weeks.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    4. Re:I would do it by GMontag · · Score: 1

      In the US, if you are "laid off" you get UB pretty quick, but if you are "fired" good luck. (just thought I was not that clear in my post)

    5. Re:I would do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was supporting a wife and a kid, for example, I imagine I'd put up with an awful lot before cutting off that income.

      I feel a Soviet Russia joke trying to escape from my keyboard :-)

    6. Re:I would do it by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      He had it backwards as well. In almost all states, voluntary termination(quitting) gets you nothing. It's the involuntary termination(fired) that gets you unemployment. It's also very helpful to have extenuating circumstances as to why you shouldn't have been fired. The best chances at unemployment are industry or economy related layoffs.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    7. Re:I would do it by BitchHead · · Score: 1

      Also depends on what kind of dependants you have. If I was supporting a wife and a kid, for example, I imagine I'd put up with an awful lot before cutting off that income.

      True 'nuff for that. I'm experiencing that one first hand right now. No kids, but my wife isn't employed right now due to some recurrent medical disabilities. On a bad day at the lab, I'd love to tell my boss to shove it, and then just walk out. But the lapse in insurance, coupled with the medical bills and lack of employment would be destructive.
      Yeah, things may suck at work: Passed over for supervisory promotion, boss treats others' opinions like crap in front of peers, workload is piling up... But with the job market as crappy as it is, I'll stay with my job rather than risking unemployment, loss of insurance, and inability to pay bills.

    8. Re:I would do it by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      Unless they decide it was your own fault you got fired, in which case you get treated exactly the same as if you resigned.

      They will contact your former employer to check you're not lying as well... one time I got laid off, my former boss called me to ask what I'd said, just to make sure I didn't lose any money :-)

      Oh, and if you're entitled, it's only the first 3 days for which you don't get paid. Still takes about 3 weeks for any claim to be sorted out; can be up to 3 months if there's 4 million on the dole at the same time (ah, the eighties...).

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    9. Re:I would do it by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I have been an unemployed Softwa Engineer/Programmer for a year, in my area (Southern NH and Nothern Mass) there is a lot of people out of work like me. Given that information, NEVER walk out on a job. Even if you have another job, you never know when burning the current bridge can come back to hurt you. You may need references, or another employer may call the company you walked out on and find out that you walked out on them. You may not get a chance to explain why, so it doesn't really matter. You should always give them 2 weeks notice minimum. If you do decide to walk, don't do it without another job lined up--especially in todays job market. There are a lot of great people that got laid off, and sometimes it was the cream of the crop that got laid off because they cost the most to keep!

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    10. Re:I would do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did walk out on a job with a wife and kid. Fortunatly the wife worked (and I had my 6 months salary saved), overwise I couldn't do it. Even with the 6 month salary it was hard. It took me 3 months to find a job that paid 2/3 my former salary (but much better benifiets, aka: I liked the people I was working with), and then I got laid off 6 months later as the company did cut backs. It took another 4 months to get a job that is now paying less than 1/2 that I made at the job I walked out on.

      So for all you perspective job drop-outs: Make sure you have some cash saved up, and if you're in a relationship, make sure you can live on your SO's income, for months if need be.

  4. No, really... by SanGrail · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds great.

    Why face the job market alone when you can face it with all your co-workers?

    --
    ---- I've fallen, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:No, really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, where and when is this going to happen? To whom should I send my resume...

    2. Re:No, really... by archeopterix · · Score: 1
      Sounds great.

      Why face the job market alone when you can face it with all your co-workers?

      Perhaps you can take some of your former customers with you? In consulting business it's not uncommon for a group of employees to form their own business stealing the former employer's customers.
    3. Re:No, really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IT shop I work in is at a Fortune 500 company, whose main LOB is *not* tech. This one company has spun off about 200 companies over the years, and we do business with just about every one of them, still. My guys & I have jokingly discussed spinning off -- I say "jokingly," because the CEO's son started with my group about 6 mos. ago, and we're not sure whether he'd be truly interested in doing it. If not, it's risky... if so, Gravy Train. :)

    4. Re:No, really... by n7ytd · · Score: 1
      In consulting business it's not uncommon for a group of employees to form their own business stealing the former employer's customers.

      Not if you've signed a non-compete contract...

  5. Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    Must there be profanity on the front page? That is offensive in the extreme, and also unprofessional. Words like that should not be used, when perfectly acceptable alternatives (such as "the company discovered in was in dire straits financially") would both be more eloquent and professional?

    1. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lighten up...

    2. Re:Please by redGiraffe · · Score: 1

      This belongs in the wrap-your-women-in-cloth bin.

    3. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta agree with the man.. whats the point?! Cursing like that is not nessesary.

      And to you sir, that kind of language only serves to make you sound unintellignet. Congrats on using the most over used and abused 4-letter word out there. Heck who even knows what it means any more. If you really wanted to insult someone you could sit down and write out a logical argment that makes sense that can not be reputed.... just like I did for you. Grow up...

    4. Re:Please by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 0, Insightful

      yeah, next time change it to sh1t since it's more professional.

      shouldn't slashdot be one of the last places to visit if you're easily offended?

    5. Re:Please by Meshsmooth · · Score: 1

      I have been in this situation and only ofencive analogies will do. Ando the analogies we used...... For our situation more offensive the analogies were, close they were describing how we felt we were being treated.

    6. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here...

      Slashdot is a place where people speak their minds, often harshly and bluntly. Even with profanity.

      No one is forcing you to read it. If you don't like it, you are free to go elsewhere.

      This isn't a tea party, nor is it a professional / business meeting.

    7. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that the profanity was in the submission itself. What next? Shall we start censoring submissions? Burning books?

    8. Re:Please by rknop · · Score: 0

      Must there be profanity on the front page?

      Not everybody is using journaling filesystems yet, so for them fsck isn't yet profane.

      -Rob

    9. Re:Please by _Eric · · Score: 1

      Modded interesting? C'mon this is a Troll. This is just everyday language. Live with it and don't be such a twat. ;-)

    10. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like you're expecting professionalism on /.?

      You've got to be fscking kidding! ;-)

    11. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was talking about the work "shit" you dumbass.

    12. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the hell up you frickin pansy.

    13. Re:Please by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 0
      At this rate the word "fuck" will eventually BE the entire English language in about 100 years.

      I, personally, am not bothered by profanity. I happen to think it's quite useful in the right circumstances and sheds no light on the true intelligence or maturity of the poster. I've seen plenty of pedants on Slashdot who think that a large vocabulary, flawless grammar and punctuation indicate an intelligent person. (Kind of like you.) Sadly, it just points to a "book smart" person with no ability to have an original thought or come up with a brand new concept. True intelligence has nothing to do with what you learned in school. It has to do with the ability to work with your environment and turn elements of it to your advantage.

      On the other hand, I've seen many very intelligent people who prefer to use profanity to lighten up their discourse. Too many "big words" make any topic boring to the average reader. One of the best college professors I ever had used to tell people to "Shut the fuck up! Who the fuck made you the teachah?!" all the time. I learned a great deal from that man and hold him in the highest regard. On the other hand, I can't tell you how many profs I had that didn't use profanity and failed to make any usable impression on my or my intellect.

      If you really wanted to insult someone you could sit down and write out a logical argment that makes sense that can not be reputed....

      I'm not saying a word...

    14. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Check it out:

      Profanity

      proÂfanÂiÂty P Pronunciation Key (pr-fn-t, pr-)

      n. pl. proÂfanÂiÂties

      The condition or quality of being profane.

      Abusive, vulgar, or irreverent language. The use of such language.

      According to the definition, most everything on this site is profane.

      Relax, and try not to get offended by every motherfucking thing you see on this goddamn shithole of a site.

    15. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      unintellignet?

      argment?

      nessesary?

    16. Re:Please by errxn · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of my favorite bathroom wall quote ever:

      "Swearing is the literary crutch of the linguistically challenged motherfucker."

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    17. Re:Please by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      His argument was quite nicely thought-out, thank you. He not only condensed a potentially lengthy rehash of an age-old argument down to 2-1/2 words, he also made it funny.

      Honestly, though. Shit? The most abused 4-letter word? I don't know much time you've spent communicating with 10-15 year old girls throughout the years, but I can tell you, the role "shit" and "fuck" can play in replacing "like" and "really" as incidental filler words is a godsend to anyone with any literary sense at all. "Shit" is at least a noun. "Like" is some sort of diseased punctation.

      "Suddenly, the company realizes its in deep financial shit, and starts making cut backs."
      or
      "Suddenly, the company realizes its in, like, really, really bad financial trouble, and starts making cut backs."

      I'll take the one that doesn't look like it was written based on the sentance structure of ancient hunter-gatherer hand-signals.

    18. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Holy shit.

      Best. Troll. Ever.

      I never realized how many slashbots were that gullible. They actually replied as if you were serious. Unbelievable.

    19. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Every now and then, there is a random word on the front page that may be construed as offensive, and I always post some variant of this. This has been my best response to date.

  6. In this economy... by EricWright · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...if you don't have a place to go, suck it up, find another job, THEN quit. You're crazy to walk out on your only opportunity these days.

    1. Re:In this economy... by pVoid · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I was in a similar situation. I did walk out. But not before making sure I had a 6 month parachute in my bank account, and some damn near certain contract work lined up.

      That being said, I thank god I had the parachute, because I've been self employed for close to 10 months now, and some of the projects I was supposed to get right after I quit my job are only now starting to come in.

      The thing you don't want to do, and I agree with parent poster here, is starve to the point that your breath smells... then you have no bargaining power anywhere, and you'll end up being a janitor. If you have enough money to float for at least a few months, you can play 'aggressive' (read not let yourself get raped) by the market.

      On a side note, quiting my job after the exact same scenario was the best thing I've ever done in my life. I used to be bitter, jaded, pessimistic, and always ready to snap into a bad mood. Now I'm jaded and pessimistic, but I enjoy life SO much more. Even more satisfying is watching the people who *didn't* quit back then, who are still complaining about the SAME things, 10 months after... not because I'm enjoying their pain, but because I can see exactly how much energy I was wasting in being that way back then.

      My moral: if things don't look good now, they will most likely not look good in 6 months unless something is done. Staying at your current place is not "something".

      Also, I would keep in mind that mass exodus will freak your managers out, hiring is the most expensive thing a company can do, so keep that in mind. You are in a company, in the business world... this is not favors in the school yard. IF you finally decide you will walk out - don't. First threaten walking out. Lay it on the table. Say "either we work a compromise of some sort, or we're out of here, chose". If you are determined to survive in the wild, then right now you are the most valuable selves you'll be ever. This is the moment when you can cash in on your skills - not when everything is peachy and all is running smooth. But always remember that you might end up staying there, so don't make ridiculous demands which will hurt the company and you ultimately either. Fine balance ain't it! =)

    2. Re:In this economy... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >Staying at your current place is not "something".

      The original poster is suggesting to do something (look for another job) while you are staying at your current place.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:In this economy... by rkz · · Score: 0, Troll

      Forget walking out

      fuck one of the managers wifes, or daugther if u don't want to fuck some 50 year old skank.
      Either should be equally easy, a 50 year old skank will be bored of her husband and probably doesn't have a huge social life OTOH the daughter will think your cool becuase of you being an older man she can show off to her college friends. (And the AUDI TT you own)

      Do this in their office and make sure you get caught, get a friend to ask the boss for some report while you are fucking his daughter/wife.
      that should get you fired and on the unemplyoment pretty quickly ;)

    4. Re:In this economy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, was not disagreeing with original poster.

      -pVoid

    5. Re:In this economy... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      You're crazy to walk out on your only opportunity these days.

      You're crazier if you stay in a bad situation.

      It's wrong to treat as an inevitability the idea that management holds all the cards, that they have more control over the quality of your life than you yourself do.

      Collective bargaining, whether in the form of organized unions or ad-hoc groups of employees with a common grievance, are a powerful method to provide equal leverage to the little guy.

      You wouldn't advise a person in an abusive relationship to stay put because they didn't have any marriage proposals from other people, would you?

    6. Re:In this economy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's amazingly bad advice from someone who's obviously never been a manager.

      As someone who is a manager, let me let you in on a secret: Noone likes an unstable employee.

      Get it? You've just announced you're unstable. You've laid it on the table, you're unhappy, things will have to change. But they can't change enough at that point, right? Corporate culture can't turn on a dime.

      So if you use this technique, expect to find yourself unemployed in 6 months. Different reasons - You might find that in an attempt to lower workload, that jobs have been shifted around and you get laid off. Letting people go is easy.

      And don't expect a decent reference. Sure the employer may have nothing to slag you with, but I've done more than one "Mr. Smith worked from this time to this time. His last title was X. Sorry, there's nothing else I can say." which is a clear signal to a potential that it wasn't a leave on good terms.

      Noone likes to have a big confrontation like this. If you can't talk friendly with your manager/supervisor at all, you're in a bad job anyway and should be looking elsewhere. And you can at least choose the time of your leaving, instead of having to look for a job in a panic.

    7. Re:In this economy... by pVoid · · Score: 1
      You are a manager I suppose then?

      That's not amazingly bad advice given what I've cited: if you decide you're leaving. Don't just leave, make an attempt to do something about it. I never told him to make this bargain if he hadn't fully commited to leaving.

      Take it as you will, mister manager. I've done exactly this, and I've got references because I have integrity. I never insulted anyone, I was very kurt and upfront. *Some* people appreciate that, those are the people I ask for references... not the managers that are actually causing me to quit in the first place.

      My team lead for example would give the best references of me because he knows I had integrity. The integrity of doing my job while I was doing it, and the integrity of saying "no" when I decided not to do it anymore (as opposed to hang around and just be a bitchy whinny person who's productivity is 30% of normal, and on whom other people just can't depend).

      Like I said, the advice is for IF he decides he wants to go.

  7. The closest I ever came... by aborchers · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was getting together with a guy from the cold line (I was a dishwasher) and walking out of a Mexican restaurant after telling the manager we were going in search of the perfect taco...

    --
    Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    1. Re:The closest I ever came... by kenthorvath · · Score: 5, Funny
      Was getting together with a guy from the cold line (I was a dishwasher) and walking out of a Mexican restaurant after telling the manager we were going in search of the perfect taco...

      And lo and behold! you found the commander on slashdot!

  8. What's really important for you? by tdvaughan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the company really is in 'deep financial shit' then your action could be the final straw. And if you're as important as you say you are then your action will have a severe impact on the company at this difficult time. I guess you need to ask yourself what you feel is more important: the well-being of the company (and your source of employment) or your personal pride? Perhaps you ought to think about how lucky you are to even HAVE a job right now.

    1. Re:What's really important for you? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Perhaps you ought to think about how lucky you are to even HAVE a job right now

      It's precisely that attitude that perpetuates the perception a lot of bosses (and governments, for that matter) have that it's OK to treat staff as consumables.

      If you act like a doormat, don't be too surprised when someone wipes his boots on you.

    2. Re:What's really important for you? by aallan · · Score: 1

      I guess you need to ask yourself what you feel is more important: the well-being of the company (and your source of employment) or your personal pride?

      Personal pride, if it was even a matter of pride, but it isn't, its self-respect. My self-respect is worth alot more to me than my lousy pay cheque.

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    3. Re:What's really important for you? by hrieke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While it is easy to cop a prima donna attitude, and call the work environment unsupportive and hostile, there are times when in fact the abuse is what is happening. Iâ(TM)ve been there, and Iâ(TM)m sure others have too (Fâ(TM)d Company lists them by the ton) and have found being unemployed is preferred to the abuse at the office.

      You owe no-one else at the company a job, that is job of the CEO / President / Founders / Partners, and to say that if so-n-so leaves the company is going to fail, so you canâ(TM)t, well, youâ(TM)re being dishonest then to the realities.

      Iâ(TM)ve seen the key people leave companies and watched them fail, and in hindsight, it isnâ(TM)t the person(s) who leaves which caused the failure, it usually was other factors that lead up to the key people leaving.

      Companies fail, itâ(TM)s life, and nothing is a given, but for taxes and death.

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    4. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the quote: It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.

      We did this at a startup about 15 years ago. The times were not that great, but it was worse staying than taking your chances. After my VP left, my boss was fired, and 5 of us left the next day. The company slowly died, and we later found out that 4 other people sued the company.

      You should never let yourself be trampled for "the good of the company".

    5. Re:What's really important for you? by SiChemist · · Score: 5, Informative

      Perhaps you ought to think about how lucky you are to even HAVE a job right now

      It's precisely that attitude that perpetuates the perception a lot of bosses (and governments, for that matter) have that it's OK to treat staff as consumables.

      You're absolutely right. My previous employer often stated that an employee should be grateful to be employed and should be willing to do him personal favors and work overtime. What a load of crap!

      The employer pays for services rendered; the employee supplies those services. No sane business expects to get services from other businesses for free, so why do they expect that from their employees?

    6. Re:What's really important for you? by l0rd · · Score: 1

      Apparently, he's being treated like shit, so he shouldn't give a shit about the company. This isn't about pride, it's about being treated like a human being.

      While things are dire right now, if you have sk1llz you'll find a (better) job eventually.

    7. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If the company really is in 'deep financial shit' then your action could be the final straw.
      This is why you should make sure managment knows
      a) how important you are and
      b) how much they vex you

      Despite what many people (and most managers) think it is no easy task replacing people. Replacing a good team, whos' skills and attatudes complement each other is next to impossible.
      Wasn't this what the whole labour movement was about? If you were organsed enough to get your whole department to sign something protesting your situation and treatinging to go on Strike you will get a reaction, maby not a good one but managment will have to react.
      Another thing to remember is if the company is in 'deep finincial s**t' you could end up out of a job with no redundancy anyway, may as well try and make your job bearable first.

      I'm posting as AC so I don't get sued if my advice goes wrong.
    8. Re:What's really important for you? by Bull999999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "It's precisely that attitude that perpetuates the perception a lot of bosses (and governments, for that matter) have that it's OK to treat staff as consumables."

      And how is this different from how employees treated employers during the economic boom? Employees demanded unheard benifits and jumped ship as soon as they found another job that pays more. Now that the table has turned, they whine.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    9. Re:What's really important for you? by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you act like a doormat, don't be too surprised when someone wipes his boots on you.

      I'm pleased to hear that the recession hasn't hit wherever you live.

    10. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot my /. password....

      I am a manager, and that's a bad attitude to have. The company relies upon staff, and if you are getting treated like shit, then walk (once you find a new job). The company owes you nothing but respect and paycheck, and you owe them respect and hard work. If they drop their end, feel free to leave.

      Sounds like it is a p[oorly managed company anyhow, if they went single-threaded on a core business unit!

    11. Re:What's really important for you? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I guess you need to ask yourself what you feel is more important: the well-being of the company (and your source of employment) or your personal pride"

      I submit that in any decent company, this question should not and will not come up. Even if it is already 'in deep financial shit'. In a decent company, staff may be asked to bear a heavier burden or even take less pay, while the downturn lasts. The point is that staff is asked to make a sacrifice, rather than being pushed into that situation by management firing half a department and then expecting the remaining staff to do all of the work. Also, a good company will reward their employees' loyalty when things go better again.

      Don't tell me that I am somehow expected to make these sacrifices. And that is exactly the attitude of (too) many companies these days: "Times are rough and we all have to suck it up. Hey, be thankful you have a job at all". Treat people like shit and they'll return the favor one day.

      And what if inviting a number of co-workers to walk out to form our own company may spell the end for your erstwhile employer, sending other people into unemployment? If you think that that fact should give you pause, think again. You are not a slave to your company nor to your coworkers.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    12. Re:What's really important for you? by CoolHnd30 · · Score: 1

      Also, if the company tanks b/c of your action. What happens to all the poor secretaries and others who had no part in your action, and can't afford to be out of work. I hope your conscience can handle it, and you have a good personal protection plan.

    13. Re:What's really important for you? by sjwt · · Score: 1

      you are too right, infact lets expand this theory..

      not too many supercomputers are being sold
      these days, hell the major companys are lucky
      when they sell them, they should stop thinking
      about being payed for the worht of the computers
      and just be happy with takeing the highest bid,
      weather its $100,000 or $100

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    14. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Insightful? Insightful?!

      I am so sick of this "Oh, pity me. Be happy you have a job!" whining. Just because you aren't flexible enough to try out for a job outside of your creepy little work niche of configuring Oracle for financial companies that use Linux while underwater -- doesn't mean that the economy sucks. Maybe you can't make $80,000 a year doing what you used to do, but there's still plenty of great, interesting jobs out there. Just don't be so stuck up. So what if you have to take a job developing Java instead of Visual C++? So what if you're making $40,000 a year instead of $55,000?

      This goes for all of you whiners. If you're any good at what you do, then you can be good at something similar to what you used to do, even if that means plugging away at databases instead of code, or configuring routers instead of building PCs.

      Me? I started my own company when times got tough. Life is good. Just open your eyes and try something that everyone else isn't.

    15. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's precisely that attitude that perpetuates the perception a lot of bosses

      What about bosses that ship all programming jobs over to India? He's just doing what's selfishly right for him. You have to think about the welfare of the company and the dozens of lives that you affect, or else you're just some other cold hearted CEO.

    16. Re:What's really important for you? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      I'm in Austin, one of the areas hardest hit by the bust -- and to hear the economic analists quoted in the papers, we're not going to have a full recovery for a while. Even that being so, finding *good* Java developers looking for work at rates we can afford is _still_ next to impossible.

      Folks with wizardly skills and sane salary requirements can still find work; only those who don't measure up need be doormats.

    17. Re:What's really important for you? by Necrobruiser · · Score: 1

      If the company IS in "deep financial shit" and you are as important as you say, then it would be in their best interests to treat you better. If you quit and the company goes under, it is not your fault.

      <rant> And if you have to stop even for a second to ask yourself if the well-being of the company is more important than your personal pride, then you might as well stay there and be the company doormat, and spend your free time washing the boss's car and mowing his lawn. A job is, at it's most basic, the barter of money for service. If you provide the service, your part of the bargain is done. Your paycheck pays for your services; it is management's job to make sure the company continues to run profitably. That is why they get paychecks of their own.</rant>

      Seriously. Even in this crappy economy, you can always get a job (waiting tables, manual labor, etc.) that will cover rent/mortgage and food. It might not be what you want to do, and your quality of life may decrease temporarily, but it can cover until you find a better job.

      --
      "I planned within my means and got a fixed rate mortgage, so where's MY bailout?" -cafepress
    18. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's precisely that attitude that perpetuates the perception a lot of bosses (and governments, for that matter) have that it's OK to treat staff as consumables.



      Only thing is, it's the fucking truth right now.

    19. Re:What's really important for you? by kraksmoka · · Score: 1
      usually, don't respond to ACs but you are coherent and an error. . .. .

      Sounds like it is a p[oorly managed company anyhow, if they went single-threaded on a core business unit!

      ok, when a company cuts costs, that means they rely on a single unit to do what two were doing before. its hardly a case of bad management, and more of a statement of what happens when you cut costs too far. there truly was a lot of fat left over from the boom times, but its very easy to cut bone along with fat

      --
      "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
    20. Re:What's really important for you? by DongleFondle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Perhaps you ought to think about how lucky you are to even HAVE a job right now."

      This is something said by people who don't have the confidence and heart to seek out a better position in life because it may mean hard times and sacrificing some of their quality of life for a while. However, those that are more enlightened realize that doing something that is rewarding and fulfilling, where you are appreciated, actually improves your quality of life much more than all the creature comforts of a steady employment position.

    21. Re:What's really important for you? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >If you act like a doormat, don't be too surprised when someone wipes his boots on you.

      How is being happy about something about their life a bad thing? I'm lucky to have a nice computer which I paid someone to build, is there a "doormat/boot" relationship here? How is that different from an "employeer/employee" relationship?

      How do you know that his boss doesn't have the opinion of: "This company outght to think about how luck it is to have employees like these."

      Employement is a two way street with risks and rewards on both sides.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    22. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I saw, it looked more like during the boom, employers offered employees huge benefits. And did any of the companies fail because they couldn't keep employees? Not to mention that it seemed like the people who did most of the job-hopping were the ones who weren't really competent in anything other than playing the image game.

      Anyway, it's hardly unreasonable to agree to the terms you're offered or have managed to negotiate.

      It is unreasonable to demand things that were never part of the deal.

    23. Re:What's really important for you? by Strych9 · · Score: 1

      At the end of the day there is no justification on the employers side for mistreating their employees period. If the answer for good times is "work harder, longer" and for bad times "work harder, longer".
      It is the behaviour of an addict.
      Maybe it is time to reconsider who you are working for. Yes I know the market isn't sh*t hot right now, but unless you are a one trick pony get your skills up to date and move to a company that doesn't have its head up its ass.

      Times are tough, things will get better

    24. Re:What's really important for you? by bryanp · · Score: 1


      And how is this different from how employees treated employers during the economic boom? Employees demanded unheard benifits and jumped ship as soon as they found another job that pays more. Now that the table has turned, they whine.


      Not all employees, thank you. Back in the 90's everyone told me I was nuts back in the 90's to stay in my "comfortable" cog-in-IT job with BigBadCo. "You should come out west and get in on one of the startups!" Now those people are saying "Man, are you guys hiring?" (no)

      --
      "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    25. Re:What's really important for you? by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      Uh...yeah...some of us didn't do that. Which is why I'm working 60 hour weeks doing web development plus on-call support in 2 different departments and still making less the $37,000 a year with no overtime compensation. Mostly this is because it was deemed in 2001 that developers did not need to work overtime and thus did not need to have the compensation clause in out contracts, which we were required to sign or else find another job in the middle of the tech bust. And my bosses are known for their crappy raises. Would you call that fair?

    26. Re:What's really important for you? by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      "there is no justification on the employers side for mistreating their employees period"

      Of course, this does not justify mistreatment. My point is to show that employees can mistreat employers as much as employers can mistreat employees.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    27. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to flame... but I would call that lack of foresight on your part. You are only worth what you think your worth... If your willing to accept $37,000/year then thats what your worth... Simple economics.

    28. Re:What's really important for you? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      You should have watched that economic boom a little closer. How much of that was on the backs of loyal employees who kept working even after salaries were cut or even suspended, in the hopes of keeping the company afloat while the CEO jetted about the country in the corporate jet?

      Eventually the employees got tired of this, and now they're showing the exact same loyalty they get from the companies: none.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    29. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends... If you have worked in IT for really large companies then you know that you can only get substantial pay increases by quitting and going to work somewhere else. You can even come back to the same company and get the same exact job but be making 50% more... Thats the problem...
      Thats also where all the opportunity was in the 90s-2000. Use your existing job to get yourself a kick butt job at some famous dot.com. Do some cool work... Then jump back into a big established company a pay grade or two higher then when you left.

    30. Re:What's really important for you? by Duck+of+Death · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I felt underpaid at the first company I worked for, asked for a raise and was told (after being strung along for a month) that they didn't think they would have any trouble hiring a replacement for me at my current salary, so no raise for me. I had a new job in 3 weeks and this was during the LAST recession. And my replacement cost them 30% more. Which hardly mattered because they were shut down (it was a bank) five months later.

      The "you're lucky you even have a job" attitude is a horrible one for any manager or executive to have. It virtually guarantees that people will start jumping ship as soon as job market starts recovering.

      Managers need to let their employees know what's going on - why they're being asked to do more, how that helps the business and the bottom line, what other sacrifices are being made, and whether there is a light at the end of the tunnel. If it just sounds like management is doing all this to keep their $250k salaries coming for an extra 5 months, then start looking now.

      If it sounds like the company will survive, why not try to negotiate an equity stake as compensation for the extra work?

      DD

      --
      "Can I finish? Can I finish? ... Okay, I'm finished."
    31. Re:What's really important for you? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      > If the answer for good times is "work harder, longer" and for bad times "work harder, longer".
      >It is the behaviour of an addict.

      Its the behaviour of an employee who just works hard. Why is this a bad thing?

      Its not like we are working in coal mines risking health etc.

      Why is working hard, getting good experience, building a reputation and setting yourself up for future employablility a bad thing?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    32. Re:What's really important for you? by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      If you are willing to work 60 hour weeks, maybe you should open your own business.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    33. Re:What's really important for you? by sogoodsofarsowhat · · Score: 1

      You hit the nail on the head.... If you want to get ahead and call the shots and not get treated like dirt...take the risk and strike out on your own. You may fail, but you will never succeed working for somebody else.... Now for the rest of you SHEEP....get you asses back to work and STFU.... If you dont have the balls to risk it all you have no rights to complain (whip cracks). Thats the reality....90% of the people in this world dream of getting ahead while wasting away...the other 10% are out there doing it and for the most part enjoying the hell outta of it. I my self am not a sheep and never have been...but i do find it funny how many people comment how good it must be to be the boss and own the company...and let me tell you it is...its a lot of work, but at the end of the day..you get your tiny checks and i enjoy the big payoff for having the balls to drive the bus... Sheep..only good for working and slaughtering....

      --
      . I love the sound of burning women and screaming rubber....
    34. Re:What's really important for you? by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      You'd be a fool to work for a company that cuts salaries of its employees doing the economic boom.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    35. Re:What's really important for you? by Gamma · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you ought to think about how lucky you are to even HAVE a job right now.

      If my supervisor says that one more time, I'm going to stab him in the eye.

    36. Re:What's really important for you? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      And how is this different from how employees treated employers during the economic boom? Employees demanded unheard benifits and jumped ship as soon as they found another job that pays more.

      Yep, and if you're not under contract, that's exactly what you should do. Back in 1998 I left Hewlett Packard to go work for a startup internet company. Now HP had a good track record with its employees in the pre-Fiorina days, but at the same time I was an at-will employee, so I offered my employer up to a month's notice, which they promptly took (fortunately the startup was very flexible about my start date).

      Maybe I felt a little bit guilty at first, but after the bubble burst good old HP shut down the entire NJ site and laid off just about every one of my former co-workers. They offered decent severance packages, which is more than most companies would do, but they certainly didn't live up to their previous records.

      That's just the way it works. You're supposed to give your two weeks notice when you leave, and they're supposed to give you two weeks severance pay when they get rid of you. Some people or companies give more, some give less, but unless you're under contract, you can do whatever you want guilt-free as long as you give a bit of notice.

      Organizing a mass-exodus with no notice. Well, that should be saved for those special companies that truly deserve it. As long as you're an exempt employee under no contract, raising your amount of work doesn't qualify. (I don't think they can legally require you to work 50-60 hours, since requiring you to work certain hours would probably make you non-exempt, check with a lawyer though, if you're actually going to hold them to that). (They can, of course, legally give you 50-60 hours of work each week).

    37. Re:What's really important for you? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      cduffy+slashdot@@@spamcop...net

      Woah, I'm almost human and I can't decode that one. I could guess, assume ... but that would be fruitless.

      -I'm in Austin, ... finding *good* Java developers looking for work at rates we can afford is _still_ next to impossible.

      Send me an email at my namesake at hotmail of com.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    38. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I submit that in any decent company, this question should not and will not come up. Even if it is already 'in deep financial shit'. In a decent company, staff may be asked to bear a heavier burden or even take less pay, while the downturn lasts. The point is that staff is asked to make a sacrifice, rather than being pushed into that situation by management...


      I work as a coder for the dept of revenue of a midwest state. In the last two years our tax revenues have dropped by $700M, putting the crunch on everything. The first thing management did was to not hire back the seasonal workers, asking the permanent staff to volunteer to split some of their time between their regular duties and the work the seasonal people did - opening and sorting tax returns and data entry. Many staff did volunteer. So did many of the management. A couple of days ago I was checking some records and noticed the Tax Commissioner's ID in the clerkID field. The timestamp was 7:16PM. I checked with some staff who verified that the TC was doing data entry.


      Decent managment won't tell you, they will lead you.

    39. Re:What's really important for you? by Ceallach · · Score: 1

      I'm in austin, and am interested in what you would consider a "sane salary" for a Java developer with 18 years experience, 7+ with Java.

      --
      -- More Smoke! The mirrors aren't working!!!
    40. Re:What's really important for you? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      the problem is that the average IT App Programmer (DB-types) have an average lifetime of 12 years.

      essentially, your mind is being destryed by companies. This is no different than having your body destroyed in coal mines.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    41. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want computing gods who can be treated and paid like slaves. Just like every other company out there today.

      If you can't find a good Java developer in Austin, try going outside and swinging a dead cat around. You'll hit quite a few of 'em.

    42. Re:What's really important for you? by e_pluribus_funk · · Score: 1

      Capitalism != (innovation|democracy|freedom)

      That may, or may not be true but it comes a hell of a lot closer than alternative economic/political philosophies.

      So, lets go down the list brutha:
      Corporatism != (innovation|democracy|freedom)
      Communism != (innovation|democracy|freedom)
      Socialism != (innovation|democracy|freedom)
      Environmentalism != (innovation|democracy|freedom)
      Fascism != (innovation|democracy|freedom)

    43. Re:What's really important for you? by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      You've cracked the code. It isn't the type of system that gets you. It's the size.

    44. Re:What's really important for you? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Exactly how is the average IT App programmer (DB-types) mind being destroyed?

      How is it different from almost any other job such as a baker or a plumber?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    45. Re:What's really important for you? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      its called a burnout rate, and its a fact.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    46. Re:What's really important for you? by dogfart · · Score: 1
      its hardly a case of bad management, and more of a statement of what happens when you cut costs too far

      A construction company that decided that since business was bad they would use only half as much concrete in their work would be engaging in very bad management. A retailer wouldn't just stock half as many items and hope to maintain the same sales. You can't just arbitrarily cut your material inputs in half and hope to stay in business. Why should you think you can get by on half the employees as well?

      --

      "dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

    47. Re:What's really important for you? by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

      Over 20 years and still going strong.

      But it is an art learning when to say no.

      --
      "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    48. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't seem to realize that employees and employers differ in one fundamental aspect.

      One is a human, starving for hapiness. The other, a faceless entity, bent on profit.

      Now you tell me which of these entities we should value and I'll tell you if employees who jump ship as soon as they find a better-paying job is immoral.

      ESPER out...

    49. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you say, if their walkout would be the last straw for the company, then they are in a good bargaing position.

      They can actually go up to the managers and ask them to think about how lucky they are to even have a job right now.

    50. Re:What's really important for you? by Strych9 · · Score: 1

      > If the answer for good times is "work harder, longer" and for bad times "work harder, longer".
      Its the behaviour of an employee who just works hard. Why is this a bad thing?

      If it is a management request, my point is that it isn't a thought out strategy it is management types who don't know what they are doing and proper managing the situation, just looking for quick answers to problems. It just doesn't work.

      Working and giving 100% is not something I disagree with, I do disagree with living to work, not working to live. The time wasted for little gain is something far more precious than the unpaid overtime.

    51. Re:What's really important for you? by GoatEnigma · · Score: 1

      Personal pride isn't important to you? That sort of reminds me of a conversation between the Bobs and Michael Bolton.... Good idea. We need more people like you to sacrifice everything to my company so that my company can make more money off of your suffering.

    52. Re:What's really important for you? by mrlpz · · Score: 1
      I was going to FlameBait moderate your ass, but then I realized this clown doesn't have a wife, kids who have Doctor's bills, or need clothes for school. Wait until you have others that RELY on you, and your perspective of "Do I, or Don't I ?" will change. And no, don't try deluding yourself into thinking it won't change. It will.

      You are EXACTLY the reason I am consulting. So whenever I encounter a client with the silly-minded notion that just because someone can pronounce PHP and can download code from a website and they can pay $12/hr for a programmer ; that I just hand them my card and say, "When you can't figure out what the guy you hire for this was doing, after you've fired him, call me. Oh, and remember what "I" was quoting you for my hourly rate ? It's double, when I'm doing "Janitorial Work".

      The man who writes the checks can call the shots... as long as he gets where the decimal point goes right.

    53. Re:What's really important for you? by WaKall · · Score: 1

      Of course, if a great number of salaried employees weren't required to work crazy overtime hours, and instead took slight pay cuts so the company could hire sufficient new employees to take on the load, maybe there would be more jobs to go around.

      Or something like that. We (the US) have high unemployment yet our employed work harder (read: more hours per week) than most, if not all, European countries. We're building our own unemployment by trading long work weeks for raises. We even creat our own inflation with these high salaries to justify working harder for the high salaries.

      Did I mention we have fewer National holidays than most other first-world countries?

    54. Re:What's really important for you? by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      "faceless entity, bent on profit."

      Last time I checked, employers are human, even if they don't act like one. Besides, if you don't like the way your employer treats you, open your own business and be your won boss or quit bitching.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    55. Re:What's really important for you? by operagost · · Score: 1
      Whip them harder.

      Seriously, you can't compare inventory to assets.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    56. Re:What's really important for you? by kraksmoka · · Score: 1

      ahh, but people can work twice as hard when whipped or given incentive properly. you can guess why most people get agitated when they are forced to do this.

      --
      "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
    57. Re:What's really important for you? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      We evidently have differing definitions of "good". IIRC, when we were advertising on monster our senior architect had to go through about 200 resumes on average to find one worth an interview.

      And we're just paid like slaves, not treated that way. (yes, I realize that "like slaves" and "sane" don't quite line up... let's say that both of those are exaggerations to one extent or another).

    58. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To some degree this is old world fantasy, meets new world reality. A lot of people have grown up hearing: "Do your job well, and you'll move up the chain. Don't demand any promotion, they'll be given to you if you do good work." Which was the mantra of the 50's. I don't think that it really worked that way then, and it sure doesn't now.

      So people are getting screwed because they think that just by doing a good job, they'll get noticed and promoted. The reality is, they need to do a good job and be smart. Don't work like a dog for peanuts. If you're salary and not making enough to justify a 60 hour week, don't.

      Make friends with your boss's boss. Tick off the boss by not working 60 hours? Not a problem. You've already told the CEO of the company that you need more man power, and by the way, how was the golf game this week?

      Take an active interest in the company. Make it a point to know all the people who are 2 levels above you (as they're the ones that can promote you). Don't let yourself get screwed.

      Of course, you need a personality that most geeks don't have. If you did, you'd already be on your way to the top, instead of stuck being the bottom feeders of the corporate world.

    59. Re:What's really important for you? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Holy cow, aren't you off the mark. Oh, I see, you started your own company and don't have to apply for a job.

      Then let me tell you how it is, the problem isn't people that are unwilling to work out of their niche, the problem is employeers unwilling to hire people out of their niche.

      I would be more than happy to do, well, anything in the IT field. But unless you have years of experence doing EXACTLY what the employer wants, you get weeded out of the pile. They do this because they are getting hundreds of resumes for a job post and they need to trim down the pile.

      BTW, I managed to grab a temp job, due to the part time job I had in college as an AS400 operator.

      If I were to try something everyone else isn't, I'd have to buy a gun. And an alibi.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    60. Re:What's really important for you? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      first of all, 12 years is an average.

      secondly, do you do all your own typing, or do you manage code-monkeys now?

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    61. Re:What's really important for you? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      I'm pleased to hear that the recession hasn't hit wherever you live.

      Well I seem to have touched a raw nerve with my original post in this thread. I don't recall having had so many replies before...

      The fact is that when I was young I was inclined to be more accommodating when an employer dealt me a serve of crap.

      20-odd years later, I do not admire the person I was then. As for recessions, I got it in the neck in 1990 when I walked off my sysprog job one month into a new mortgage, with interest rates at 17%, and no sign of other employment on the horizon. I think that qualifies, don't you?

      Sure, it's hard, but I feel better about myself for taking that step. In my case, I went into blacksmithing for 10 years, and am now back at University again. It's decisions like these that ultimately leave you with a life worth living.

    62. Re:What's really important for you? by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

      I do all my own typing. I prefer not to do management.

      --
      "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    63. Re:What's really important for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you cut the leasure newspaper reading: you can squeeze in another 10+ hours. how do i contact you for a job offer?

    64. Re:What's really important for you? by sogoodsofarsowhat · · Score: 1

      Funny, BUT I DO HAVE WIFE AND KID. ANd i did my risk taking when we first got married and she was with child. So dont hand me your, I gotta not take chances shit...Getting outta bed puts you at risk everyday. I just love to hear losers bemoan about not getting ahead and how hard life is. Ive suffered greatly and had my power/water/gas shut off. Ive wondered how the hell i would pay the employees and after that how i would pay myself. I have never once taken any handout from the government or used any status for preferential treatment. What I HAVE DONE IS WORKED HARD! If you try and fail, there is no shame. But to sit back and expect that as a worker you are entitled to anything but hand-to-mouth existance is nothing but a flight of fancy. Time to get real and realize this is not the world your parents and grand-parents grew up in. I have never laid a single employee off, even in the hard times, I do value their work. But they will get a reasonable wage (they will never get rich) But i on the other hand enjoy the fruits from being the risk taker. So dont preach to me....you are the fool. There are over 1 billion chinese (or india or whatever country) whom will gladly do your job as well or better and for less money. You better find a way to make it ahead in life or you will be on the low end of the earning scale. This is not a troll, it is in fact a cruel hard fact....if you dont believe it go read up at F*CKEDCOMPANY.com and you will see the writing is on the wall. (Tell me i dont know about priorities...and taking care of a family.... some of you people are truley pathetic....)

      --
      . I love the sound of burning women and screaming rubber....
    65. Re:What's really important for you? by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you ought to think about how lucky you are to even HAVE a job right now
      If you work twice as hard (as hard as two men); then are you keeping your job, or preventing another job from being created than if you worked half as hard? People like you ruin the economy for everybody else.

      You just work, let the Government pick up the pieces of your life if you get fired, that's its job. In the US if you IT guys don't get unemployment benefits then you better mop floors (I mean it!) or overthrow your Government fast!

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    66. Re:What's really important for you? by Anitra · · Score: 1

      Me? I started my own company when times got tough. Life is good.

      That's great. Not everyone can do that. Personally, I'd love to be grossing $40,000/year. But it took my 3 years of experience to get an "entry-level" "internship" that will only last until October. And the company can pay me $15/hr with NO benefits because the job is temporary, and I needed money and "real-world experience".

      When I finish this internship (coincidentally, around the same time I finish my B.S.), I HOPE I can find another job that pays this well. Hell, I hope I can find another JOB.

      Just open your eyes and try something that everyone else isn't.

      Right. Like collecting cans to pay rent and living on $0.50 Ramen each day? Oh wait, I know people who are "trying" that, too.

      Anger aside, I'm just trying to point out to you: not everyone has the drive and the diversity of skills necessary to run their own company.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    67. Re:What's really important for you? by mrlpz · · Score: 1

      Get real.....and of course those "valued employees" will be saying at your wake..."what an A$$ wipe he was". Get off the soap box you're standing on before you trip, fall, and whatever's making your eyes brown smells up the rest of the place...

  9. shore did by _Smacndeez_ · · Score: 1

    Same scenerio, but slightly different when I was about 17 at the shop I worked at. But it ended up that we all were outof work :(

    1. Re:shore did by akaina · · Score: 1

      But at the time you were 17 you only had 12 years of education, and 0 years of real-world application - probably in a cozy small town shoppe.

      Now you probably have 17 or 18 or 22 years of education (that you've sunk a small fortune to obtain), and probably 4 years of dragon slaying in a hostile industry. You know more about what you do than your boss - so he can play hardball, but he can't do your job.

      Believe me, as long as you never forget the importance of being able to produce you won't find yourself without work. And when the time comes where you feel you can produce better elsewhere, you'll have confidence in your move.

      All the jobs I've left I've never looked back on. I was professional about negotiations and respectful when I left and I've done nothing but better work since. That doesn't mean I've never had to eat PB&J for dinner but I've always found better higher paying jobs. And guess what... some of the best nights of sleep I've ever had where when I crashed on someone's rug with a shoe as a pillow. These are the best years of your lives and I believe you can handle anything a dying company can throw at you - and still walk away smiling.

      --
      Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.
  10. The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You'd better have something lined up to move into, because you will have certainly burned bridges at your current employer. Plus, how will you spin this situation to prospective employers during the interview process?

    Q: So, why did you leave your last position?

    A: Things got rough, they treated us like dirt, I left.

    This will raise doubts in the mind of the interviewer as to whether you're a person who can help an organization weather tough times...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by ashultz · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Well, you're welcome to play it safe that way, carefully moving from exploiting company to exploiting company.

      Clearly you should spin it a little better than that sentence, but if a company looks at you and thinks "hm, when we want him to bend over and take it, he's not going to" and the doesn't give you a job... did you want to work for them?

      -andy

    2. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by coldcity · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's not an interview I would accept a job offer from anyway - remember I just stormed out because I was sick of being treated like shit, not because I wanted to be someone else's bitch.

      Something similar happened to me once. I explained to my next employer that if put in the same position again, I would simply leave again.

      They were cool, it was all good.

      --
      coldcity
      code, life, art
    3. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As an employer, I would naturally consider whether a prospect is the type that will help the company get through tough times, or bolt when the stress hits. The process to hire for an opening is long, expensive, and time consuming, so you'd like to hire people that will stick around.

      An an employee, there are two additional ways to look at this. First and foremost, have your concerns been known to management, or is this a bunch of guys grumbling at the water cooler? If management knew that things had gotten that bad, they would take action. Why would they risk a critical team walking out like that? They might not be able to wave a wand and make things better right away, but they'll most likely do something. Secondly, as an employee you can also look at circumstances like this as an opportunity...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by travdaddy · · Score: 1

      But, if the company is really in "deep financial shit," then they might go under, and it won't matter if you've burned bridges or not.

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    5. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by ronfar · · Score: 1
      Peter: "What if we're still doing this when we're fifty?"

      Samir: "It would be nice to have that kind of job security."

      -- Office Space

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    6. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It's a small world. Many of the managers have friends, and will be able to find work fairly quickly.

      You may find yourself applying to the companies that those managers have moved to, and you don't want to be considered one of the people that was responsible for their last company going under.

    7. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by borroff · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if EVERYONE left, it becomes clear that the problem wasn't with you, it was with the company. We're talking about a mass exodus here; If you're applying for a job in the same vertical market, or even in the same town, the word of these gets around.

      That having been said, it is still much better to go from strength to strength. It's like getting a loan: you're much more likely to get a job if you don't actually need one.

    8. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But, if the company is really in "deep financial shit," then they might go under, and it won't matter if you've burned bridges or not.

      Until you run into a co-worker at a different company. Assuming that you're not the only semi-competent person and that your company does go under, those who worked with you will be out there finding new jobs too, and they might remember you when you apply.

      Did you want advice? Make your case with management, but do not threaten to leave. Just leave, as an individual decision, when you think it's clear that they will not cooperate. If you behave well your co-workers won't have as many axes to grind when you bump into them later.

    9. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by sterno · · Score: 1

      This is all a matter of phrasing. Going into detail about their expectations and how you were treated will give them some insight on the matter. If you said, "they wanted me to work 50-60 hour weeks", without further explanation, then yes, I agree with your assessment. You need to hilight the attitude of the company not the actions. Are they telling you to do it, or are they asking you to do it to help them out?

      --
      This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    10. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you want to work for them?

      Unless you're independently wealthy (or some naive student), most people want to work for *anybody* right now. In case you haven't noticed, there's an extreme shortage of jobs in the US right now.

    11. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by infinite9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This will raise doubts in the mind of the interviewer as to whether you're a person who can help an organization weather tough times...

      What is the matter with everyone? I know who I am, do you know who you are? What do you want from life? This discussion reminds me of a commercial that's currently playing on the radio. It's a world wide wireless commercial where this guy is playing golf with his boss. The narrator describes the perfect ass-kissing session. Then wraps up with the boss making a condescending comment to the employee. "He's getting noticed!" I say bull-shit! Life is not about climbing the corporate ladder, or kissing the right asses, or doing what's "proper" (something my step father always harped on). It's about friends, family, personal growth, and happiness. Are your priorities straight? What will you tell your kids after 20 years of 60 hour work weeks and three heart attacks when they hate you? I was providing for you? More important than paying the bills, or climbing the ladder, or saying the right thing in a meeting, or working long hours is simply being present for your children. Who will be your friends when you retire? Your boss? Your indian coworkers? What goals are you working toward? To make director by age 40? I have two main goals right now. One is to sell my house for enough money to pay cash for my next place to live. The other is to support my five kids while only working 75% of the year so that I can take month long RV trips with them in the summers and be home for every christmas vacation. These are attainable goals if you set your priorities correctly. If you hate your job, quit. It's not worth it. Find another one. Or change careers. But never lose sight of what's important. Like the other poster said, if you act like a door matt, people will walk all over you. The answer to the question above is perfectly acceptable. They treated me badly, I left. Saying this sends a message to the new employer that they can't treat you like dirt, which is what you want, right? Being a pussy and bending over for the new employer will set you up to be treated that way. If they don't hire you, so be it. Find something else. I've lost jobs because of this attitude. But I've been unemployed for only about 6 weeks total over the last three years. When I interviewed for my current position, I made it clear. Jerk me around and I'll leave. So far, I've been treated with respect. And I'll continue to work here as long as that doesn't change.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    12. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by msuzio · · Score: 1

      If you answer the question like that, I wouldn't give you a job either. Geez, learn to play the game. Spin it a bit. I'm not going to check your references, and even if I did, I know the company can't tell me anything interesting anyway. I'd just be checking factuals -- did you do position X with responsibilities Y? They can't tell me anything but the facts...

      No, if I were a person who walked (and I've been there before), I would say something like this:

      "My previous employer, although a great place to be for many years, seemed to be having some significant organizational issues, and after some time in that environment, I decided I needed to pursue another opportunity. I decided to take some time in finding my next position so I could be sure I was someplace where I felt a real bond. And Mr. Interviewer, I feel that bond with MegaSuperCorp, let me tell you!"

      Trust me, that works ;-)

      Everyone here is all like doom and gloom and negativity. Yeah, the economy sucks. Yeah, I wouldn't want to lose or leave my job right now either. But all the same, I'm not going to take being treated like shit on a continual basis... my self-worth and other factors in life are far more important. This just shows people that you *do* have to save for a rainy day when times are at all 'good', because then you do have the freedom to leave these situations if you have to.

    13. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you do. I still get 2-3 phonecalls a week from various recruiters looking for contract staff.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    14. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That depends.

      A better way to formulate the answer (if true), would be something like:

      A: We hit hard times and the few of us left had to work overtime constantly. After a year of doing everything I could, things still looked like they were only getting worse, and the demands from the company kept getting even more unreasonable. I decided that my future had to lie elsewhere.

    15. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      If your career is only about getting a paycheck to support your life outside of work, that's a perfectly fine attitude to have. For others, who aspire to grow and enjoy taking on bigger and better challenges, situations like these become opportunities.

      In short, a mass-walkout is an extreme reaction to a situation, which should only be looked at after other options have been explored. Far too often, disgruntled employees never take their concerns to management, when something could have been done. If you do that, and they still treat you like dirt, then by all means leave. I did just that about 10 years ago, and it was the best career move I ever made...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    16. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by dejaffa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly! My experience is that, in most cities, the IS world is a small town where everybody may not know everybody, but they know somebody who knows everybody.
      If you're going to leave, treat the people you're leaving (management) politely, and it will pay off later.

      --
      There is no 'i' in team, but there is in fiasco...
    17. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by ashultz · · Score: 1


      Fair enough. But there's a wide difference between help get through tough times and many of the things workers are called to do.

      When the company needs you to pull long hours for a few months, that's getting through tough times. When they lay off most of your department for the forseeable future with no change in work load, that's exploitation. Making one person do five people's work for a quarter to get over the hump is pulling together. Trying to get them to do that forever because you can't budget for enough people to actually do the work...

      Employers do look for people they can do that to, but I'm not going to be one of them. I am, however, one of the former people - I've put in my long hours to make deadlines and taken my pay cuts in the hopes of making things better soon. But I won't wait around forever hoping eventually things will be better.

      Also, brining up your gripes is important. But if management is asking you to pull 80 hour weeks forever, you shouldn't need to tell them you're pissed. Either they know, or they're too dumb to be told.

      -andy

    18. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by Alan+Cox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "A: Things got rough, they treated us like dirt, I left."

      The correct A is of course

      "A: it became obvious that I wasnt going to fufill my potential at the former employer so I'm applying somewhere with more management vision"

      This all also depends on country. In much of Europe in that situation its more effective to exercise the right to secret ballot to unionize the office.

      (Especially if the parent company is american because US unions are a bit different and some US employers have series mental scars from meeting them and the results of the word union in their presence is a kodak moment 8))

      The other question raised is whether you would break the company. In which case its a shame the execs havent actually had the decency to call everyone together and explain precisely how far there is between the shit and the fan and what has to be done about it.

    19. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by Taldo · · Score: 1
      Clearly you should spin it a little better than that sentence, but if a company looks at you and thinks "hm, when we want him to bend over and take it, he's not going to" and the doesn't give you a job... did you want to work for them?

      Ideally, no. Practically speaking, I'm fond of the little luxuries in life.... like... dinner.

    20. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by aonifer · · Score: 1
      Q: So, why did you leave your last position?

      A: I couldn't afford an AK-47.

    21. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      The process to hire for an opening is long, expensive, and time consuming, so you'd like to hire people that will stick around.

      That's more like it. That's the truth. And yet you still hear the following bleated in all slashdot discussions on this topic: "Watch out, man - the company will just replace you - it's easy; there are loads of people hungry for jobs."

      Nobody ever seems to consider the question: will those people be any good at their jobs?

      Hiring good people is hard work and time-consuming.

      Hiring the first dumb idiot that walks into the interview is easy, though, which I guess explains many things.

    22. Re:The IS version of Johnny Paycheck by Anitra · · Score: 1

      ...to support my five kids while only working 75% of the year so that I can take month long RV trips with them in the summers and be home for every christmas vacation. These are attainable goals if you set your priorities correctly.

      Dude, how? 5 kids is expensive.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
  11. No, but... by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We haven't done that, yet, but our concern right now is like everyone else: unemployment. A few of us are thinking of putting together a business plan to start a new company, but that's going nowhere fast. We don't yet have that one great, unique, amazing software idea to start a company. So we're all stuck waiting it out until the market's better and we can move on or we finally come up with that great idea.

    1. Re:No, but... by kenthorvath · · Score: 5, Funny
      So we're all stuck waiting it out until the market's better and we can move on or we finally come up with that great idea.

      I had an idea like that once.

      Really? What was it, Tom?

      Well, alright. It was a jump to conclusions mat!

      *puzzled looks*

      You see, there'd be this mat that you'd lay on the floor and it would have different "conclusions" on it that you could jump to...

      Never mind....

    2. Re:No, but... by peripatetic_bum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      let me tell ya something,
      it's gonna' take more than one brilliant great idea. it actually takes like ten, of which only one works.

      im helping a web hosting co. the brilliant idea wa to be non-profit. guess what happened: no profit.
      now they are thinking of just selling the assets

      --

      Sigs are dangerous coy things

    3. Re:No, but... by cnelzie · · Score: 2, Informative

      It takes more then a handful of developers to start a software company. If your department is nothing by developers, with little knowledge outside of software development you will have only a small chance at success.

      Companies are in departments that are interdependent in order to compliment eachother.

      You would need to have a good salesperson or two, someone GREAT with finances, like an accountant with at least a Bachelors, but better with a Masters Degree in Accounting.

      You may also need someone with professional management skills. Not just a software team management style, but someone with a degree in Business Management.

      The other person you would likely want to have is a professional purchasing agent. If you don't have someone that is GREAT at negotiating purchases and discounts your company will be bleeding money like there is no tomorrow. A good Purchasing Agent can cut costs by several percentage points.

      With all that in mind, I wish you the best. It is a tough economy, but with the right crew and an innovative product, that fits perfectly in an uncovered niche market or is a POWERFUL broad use tool you could likely be looking at success.

      Good luck!

      --
      If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    4. Re:No, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My NDA explicitly forbids that kind of thing. If I were to walk out with a handful of people in tow I'd be sued into the ground. Are you sure about the status of your NDA (presumably you have one).

    5. Re:No, but... by SL33Z3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In general, if the consensus is that they all leave together, their leaving would be non-actionable and thrown out of course. NDA's are like the babblings of mental patients -- just because they say it and believe it doesn't make it true. They can have you sign NDA's all day long, but the courts and laws prevail for your rights. For instance, North Carolina is a right-to-work state. If I were to be fired and I went to work for a competitor, the ONLY actionable item my former employer would have is if I gave away their trade secrets to my new employer --- and they would have to prove it. Outside of that, the NDA can't prohibit me from gaining work in my career field with my skill sets.

      Reason being : North Carolina doesn't want to send me an unemployment check if their is a company willing to hire me.

      --
      SL33ZE - Artificial Intelligence is No Match For Natural Stupidity -
    6. Re:No, but... by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      I'd buy one....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    7. Re:No, but... by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      You may also need someone with professional management skills. Not just a software team management style, but someone with a degree in Business Management.

      yeah, because we all know that managers with business management degrees know what they're doing.

    8. Re:No, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where is that from? i know i've heard of that before... movie? book? actual product?

    9. Re:No, but... by zackbar · · Score: 1

      Office Space.

      I couldn't remember either, but did a dejanews lookup.

    10. Re:No, but... by jargoone · · Score: 4, Funny
      Ah, I get it now:


      1. Quote Office Space
      2. ???????
      3. KARMA!!!!!

    11. Re:No, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "A few of us are thinking of putting together a business plan to start a new company, but that's going nowhere fast. We don't yet have that one great, unique, amazing software idea to start a company."

      Maybe you shouldn't be looking for "one great ... idea". If you consider the founding of Autodesk, you'll see that the founders developed a portfolio of products. Some clicked, some didn't. One that clicked became AutoCAD ... and the rest is history. Of course, the company that became Autodesk was started 25 years ago, so the environment is different now.

  12. Danger! Social Justice Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    Will Robinson - my hooks are flailing wildly! Dangerous union-like activity reported! Shall I deploy anti socialism defences and the boss-pay rises?



    Europa Endlos

  13. revenge is a dish best served cold by Spiked_Three · · Score: 1

    I heard that somewhere.
    I wouldn't do anything now, because the market sucks. But when you have another job lined up, hot poker up the butt to em.

    --
    slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
  14. The real solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is to collectively refuse to do any work, until you get fired or laid off.

    You can't collect unemployment when you quit, you know.

    1. Re:The real solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can if you can prove reasonable circumstances for leaving

    2. Re:The real solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's called insubordination, and you will not get unemployment if you are fired for cause... (insubordination).

      I would recommend that they don't work so hard. Also, start looking for another job. If you want to improve your situation, have a collective barngaining session with the manager of your devision. If it isn't fruitful move up the chain.

    3. Re:The real solution... by PhxBlue · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sounds kinda like the definition of a strike. Which leads to another thought: unionize? You get to keep your job, and maybe you'll be able to bargain for better working hours as well.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    4. Re:The real solution... by Fulg · · Score: 1
      Is to collectively refuse to do any work, until you get fired or laid off.

      You can't collect unemployment when you quit, you know.

      Actually (over here in Canada anyway), you don't collect unemployment benefits when you get fired as a result of not doing work you were paid to do, so slacking off isn't always an option...
      --
      gcc: no input sig
    5. Re:The real solution... by vasqzr · · Score: 0



      You don't get unemployment if you get fired, either.

    6. Re:The real solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NY state is a right to work state. Anotherwards you don't have work for a company, any more so than a company has to keep you employeed. My company cut my salary by over 33% due to their financial constraints. When calling the labor board I basically learned that even if they were trying to force me out...as long as their paying me minimum wage and I wasn't being discriminated against, then there is NOTHING they can do.

      These ideas sound great, and its quite common for coworkers to group to gather against the injustices of the "man/company". But when it comes down to a paycheck, you will be surprised where peoples values land.

      Best advice I can give...Suck it up cupcake, look for something else, and make the smart decision, not that rash one.

    7. Re:The real solution... by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      IANAL but the effectiveness of unionizing depends on what state the poster is in, unions in right to work states have considerably less teeth than states without right to work legislation. The problem for unions in RTW states is that "scabs" are effectively legal since membership in the union is not mandatory. More info is available here. So you can strike, but you can also be permanently replaced at the same time. You can get a current list of RTW states here. I have mixed emotions about unions myself so I can't comment either way.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    8. Re:The real solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NY a right to work state?

      They probaly cut your salary because your job-related knowledge was as shallow as your grasp of labor law.

    9. Re:The real solution... by robklaus · · Score: 1

      Is to collectively refuse to do any work, until you get fired or laid off. You can't collect unemployment when you quit, you know.

      Nor can you collect unemployment if you are fired for not doing your job!

    10. Re:The real solution... by asr_man · · Score: 1

      You can't collect unemployment when you are fired for cause either.

    11. Re:The real solution... by ehkz · · Score: 1

      Up here in Canada you can claim employment insurance if you quit with just cause and you exercised some sort of actions to remedy the reason for quitting with your employer, ie. ask for a transfer to another location. They donâ(TM)t give u much money 55% of what u were making, up to about $900/month. Once your on Employment Insurance a few doors open up, fairly easy to get grants to go back to school, they will usually pay your whole cost of school, since IT market so saturated might as well go back to school and get some more certs to offer more then âoethe other guyâ at your next interview.
      List Of 40 Main Reasons Which May Amount To Just Cause (Alphabetical Order)

      1. Adoptionâ"Leave Not Granted
      2. Armed Forcesâ"Failure to Re-enlist for a Further Term
      3. Course of Instruction or an Employment Activityâ"Referred by a Designated Authority and Starting Within a Short term
      4. Disciplinary Actionâ"Penalty Clearly Disproportionate
      5. Discrimination on a Prohibited Ground
      6. Dutiesâ"Intolerable Situation
      7. Health Adversely Affected by Work or Working Environment
      8. Health Adversely Affectedâ"On Credible and Convincing Explanations from the Claimant
      9. Health Adversely Affectedâ"On Doctor's Advice
      10. Illness in Immediate Familyâ"Presence Required
      11. Intolerable Situationsâ"Living Accommodations, Food, Facilities, Employment Amenities
      12. Moral Objections Based on Religious Beliefs
      13. Moral Objections: Employer's Practices Contrary to Professional Ethics, Law
      14. Moral Objections: Illegal Activities or Contrary to Fundamental Ethical Values
      15. Moving Because of an Anticipated Marriage
      16. Moving with Parents in the Case of a Minor
      17. Obligation to Accompany a Spouse or Dependent Child to Another Residence
      18. Obligation to Care for a Child or a Member of the Immediate Family
      19. Overtimeâ"Excessive Hours
      20. Overtimeâ"Failure to Pay
      21. Pregnancyâ"Incapacity to Work and Leave Not Granted
      22. Reasonable Assurance of Another Employment in the Immediate Future
      23. Relation with Authorityâ"Hostile Atmosphere Created by Superiors
      24. Relation with Co-workersâ"Abusive Treatment
      25. Retirementâ"Undue Pressures from Employer
      26. Sexual or Other Harassment
      27. To Start a Business or to Become Self-employed in a Near Future
      28. Transportation problemsâ"serious, even insolvable
      29. Union Relationsâ"Employer's Abusive Treatment
      30. Union Relationsâ"No Longer Acting as Strike-breaker
      31. Wagesâ"Formal Promise of Increase Not Fulfilled
      32. Wagesâ"Hiring Conditions Not Honoured
      33. Wagesâ"Loss Due to Employer's Financial Difficulties
      34. Wagesâ"Unjustified Reduction
      35. Wages or Salary Less than Provided by Legislation
      36. Work Away from Familyâ"Serious Illness in the Family
      37. Work Away from Familyâ"After a Reasonable Period of Absence
      38. Working Conditionsâ"Significant Unilateral Changes
      39. Working Conditionsâ"Unreasonable, Restrictive
      40. Working Conditions that Constitute a Danger to Health or Safety

    12. Re:The real solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could always "accidently" cut your leg off with the bagel slicer. Then you get diability for life!

    13. Re:The real solution... by foobario · · Score: 1
      Ummm... I thought of this too, so I looked up the document on our corporate website that detailed exactly what you could be fired for.

      It turns out that at my company, coming in and sitting at your desk and not doing your job means you have implicitly quit, and they don't need to fire you... you quit honoring your contract with them when you decided not to do the work they assigned you.

      Similarly for coming in late, leaving early, taking 4 hour lunch breaks... none of the 'passive' techniques are defined as a firable offense, they are defined as you announcing that you have quit.

      I read that document about a hundred times, trying to see what I could do to get fired. It turns out there is *NOTHING* I could do to get fired that I couldn't also be arrested for.

      When tech companies have a structure like this:

      management
      legal
      marketing
      ...
      engineers
      it should come as no surprise that you don't have any options... the 'management' and 'marketing' departments make sure that your job is impossible, and the 'legal' department makes sure that if you leave, you do it on their terms.
  15. Some questions and observations... by warmcat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...that might help you make up your mind.

    Would you rather be out on your own looking for another job than continuing to turn up every day and take what is being dished out? Consider that despite the angry words of your colleagues, they may not step up when the crucial moment comes, and you alone may be the one leaving. Is that still okay?

    Do you have savings to take 6 months with no income, or maybe shares you can sell to cover that period... because if you leave, it will be like leaving a relationship, you will be depressed, think and talk of nothing else for months, boring your friends and family until you get over it.

    Is there any upward future for you in the company, ie, is continuing to work there acting as an investment for you that may pay off at a later time? If there is some hope of a career path, given how you are treated by people at that level, is that somewhere you want to be? Given the trajectory of the company, is there going to be a later time for this to pay off in?

    Can you get out without dropping innocent colleagues in the shit?

    1. Re:Some questions and observations... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      despite the angry words of your colleagues, they may not step up when the crucial moment comes

      My experience tells me you are right. Ultimately, since we can no longer expect any loyalty from employers, it follows that we have to look after ourselves since no-one else will. I have seen many situations where solidarity with co-workers has failed to stand the pressure-test, since everybody has their own perceptions of what is important to them.

      There are times when it's worth spending a weeks or more without a job (I never say unemployed) if that's what it takes to maintain your self-respect. And yes, I do know what it's like to sleep under bridges in winter, I have done it.

    2. Re:Some questions and observations... by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you have savings to take 6 months with no income

      I'm glad someone brought that up... if you don't (or aren't working toward that goal - and by that I include paying off debts like credit cards first), and you're currently employed, then you're an idiot. Plain and simple.

      And if you claim that that's bullshit, and you can't save that kind of money, then you need to go read some investment books. I highly recommend pretty much anything from The Motley Fool, as well as The Millionaire Next Door. It's not that hard, and saving for your retirement and for short-term unemployment is the best thing you can do.

      Anyway, if you don't have those kinds of funds, seriously think about securing a new position before leaving the old one. Otherwise you're going to be in a world of hurt. And realize that while 3-6 months of savings is good, plan ahead for what you're going to do when that money runs out and you still haven't found a position. Don't be negative, just be realistic -- part of that includes planning for worst cases. (And, actually, if you don't have a job in 6 months then you also need to figure out what to do for health insurance - COBRA runs out at that point. Don't go uninsured, since any future insurer will then be able to point at "previously existing medical condition" to avoid paying for many things).

      Can you get out without dropping innocent colleagues in the shit?

      Doubtful, but there's little he can do about that at this point... if the managers are overworking their staff, it's not his fault. And getting out may be the best thing to do. Yeah, more will fall on his coworkers, but that was due to bad decisions by management, not by him (I hope).

      As far as the mass exodus bit goes: unless you have a business plan to work on for yourself and your coworkers -- complete with funding -- then there's no point. All you're doing is walking away from the company, ensuring you can't even get unemployment benefits, and screwing the company while you're at it. If you're unhappy with the job, then leave. Or at least start looking for a new gig. Don't take all this crap about "be happy you have a job!" because some jobs just aren't worth it.

      Yes, not having a job sucks - I was let go from my company (along with 60% of the other employees) ~18 months ago. And I found a new job in a bit over a month. But wow did that suck. If I hadn't been let go, then I would've been looking anyway, because I'm quite sure that the job went to hell in a handbasket.

    3. Re:Some questions and observations... by FortranDragon · · Score: 1

      "And, actually, if you don't have a job in 6 months then you also need to figure out what to do for health insurance - COBRA runs out at that point."

      One small clarification, COBRA lasts up to *18* months. After that period you _may_ have the option to convert it to a individual policy. I know because I've been there.

      That said, COBRA is damned expensive because you are now paying your side AND the company's side of the insurance premium. If you have family coverage your COBRA payment could be upwards to a $1,000 a month. So budget accordlingly if you are someone like me that has to have insurance (I'm a type 2 diabetic).

      Also, if your company decides to change insurance companies in the middle of your COBRA you'll be changed with them. You'll automatically get the insurance, but you'll have no choice in staying with the prior plan (if you like it better). You're treated like an employee which is good and bad. My wife and I went from a great plan to a crappy one because of this. :-/ Luckily we were able to pick up insurance through where she worked to get to a better plan.

      COBRA can be a life saver, but few people realize just how expansive it can be to fund your own health insurance.

      --
      "All the darkness in the world can not quench the light of one small candle."
    4. Re:Some questions and observations... by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      I think you did the best job of summing it up

      As for some jobs not being worth it - Yep, been there, done that. Leaving that job for a 15% pay cut was one of the best things I ever did! I really KNOW it's time to leave when you start thinking "You know, I could reach across the desk and kill him, right now. Prison is better than this" (I was gone within 2 weeks from that day)

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    5. Re:Some questions and observations... by Kombat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if you don't [have 6 months of money saved up], and you're currently employed, then you're an idiot. Plain and simple.

      This is incorrect. If you have 6 months worth of living expenses saved up ($15,000+ for me), just sitting in an account somewhere, "just in case," then you're an idiot.

      That's what a line of credit is for.

      Sure, of course you should be investing and everything. I've got money invested in plenty of places. But if I were to lose my job tomorrow, I've got a $15,000 line of credit I could live off of for a couple of weeks or more, while I did some paperwork to liquidate some of my investments, as necessary.

      I get at the money, pay back the line of credit, and live off of the retirement money I need, until I get another job. In the meantime, that money was working hard for me in interest-bearing investment vehicles, instead of just sitting in an account somewhere, not even keeping up with inflation (thus, becoming worth less and less).

      Now, if you've been employed for a while, and don't even have a retirement fund big enough to support you for 6 months in an emergency, then I'd agree, you'd be an idiot.

      Sitting on a pile of cash, not gaining interest, is stupid. Plain and simple.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    6. Re:Some questions and observations... by asr_man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lines of credit are secured by your ability to repay. Becoming unemployed is technically a material change in your creditworthiness of which the creditor expects to be notified (you promised to do so when you signed the credit agreement). And guess what? Your line of credit will be revoked. Nobody bothers to notify of course, and we usually do find jobs and no one's the wiser -- but if or when you hit rock bottom and go into collection and beyond it can be antoher strike against you.

    7. Re:Some questions and observations... by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 1

      If you have 6 months worth of living expenses saved up ($15,000+ for me), just sitting in an account somewhere, "just in case," then you're an idiot.

      But that's exactly the whole point of a savings account. Keeping that kind of money in the bank even if you're raking in cash is definitely not stupid. It will earn a fairly decent amount of interest before you need to use it.

      That's what a line of credit is for

      LOL! With no job? That's rich! (pun intended)

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    8. Re:Some questions and observations... by Kombat · · Score: 1

      But that's exactly the whole point of a savings account.

      No it's not - a savings account is for frequent transactions. It is definitely not an investment vehicle. Savings account yield what, about 1.5% interest, at a maximum? That doesn't even keep pace with inflation.

      Keeping that kind of money in the bank even if you're raking in cash is definitely not stupid.

      Yes it is. If you're raking it in, put that money into mutual funds. You can cash them out at any time. If an emergency comes up, or you lose your job, then you call them up and say "I would like to sell these mutual funds," and 2 days later, $20,000 materializes in your savings account.

      [Re: Line of Credit]
      LOL! With no job? That's rich! (pun intended)

      I don't understand. You get the line of credit while you're employed. I have one. I'm employed. If I were to become unemployed, I would still have my line of credit. If I were to become unemployed, I'd put the call into my investment insitution to liquidate some mutual funds. Until I got that money, if for some reason my savings account was virtually empty and I had some big, undelayble expenses coming up, then I'd take the money out of my line of credit and put it into my savings account to pay those bills until I got at the mutual fund money. Then, I'd pay off the line of credit. At most, I'd have tapped into maybe a couple grand of the line of credit, for 1 week, max, immediately after being laid off, then I'd have paid it off. I'd spend the rest of my unemployment living off of that investment money, liquidating more mutual funds, as necessary. Hopefully not for very long!

      Where's the problem here?

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    9. Re:Some questions and observations... by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 1

      No it's not - a savings account is for frequent transactions. It is definitely not an investment vehicle.

      I'll agree with you that a savings account isn't ideal for investment, no one is going to retire with that money. However, if you roll that money into a mutual fund, COD or other type of investment and you try to withdraw you will encur some major penalities, tax and otherwise. A savings account doesn't have these problems. And wouldn't a checking account be more suited to frequent transactions?

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    10. Re:Some questions and observations... by Kombat · · Score: 1

      The distinction between "checking" and "savings" accounts these days is very subjective. I have checks for both my checking and savings accounts at CIBC. There is effectively no difference between the accounts, except I access one using the name "Checking" at an ATM, and the other using "Savings."

      if you roll that money into a mutual fund, COD or other type of investment and you try to withdraw you will encur some major penalities, tax and otherwise.

      Say you and I put $10,000 aside for emergencies. You put yours in a ssvings account yielding 1.2% per annum, while I invest mine in a balanced blue-chip mutual fund.

      Time goes on, and 10 years later, we both lose our jobs. Your $10,000 is now worth $11,266.92. I had the misfortune of investing during a bad time and only manage to earn about 5% on my money. I would have $16,288.95. I choose to sell this mutual fund, and the fee is $100. It was unregistered, so the tax calculations are not complicated - I simply owe capital gains on $6,288.95. This is Canada, so I would basically pay income tax on half of that. Income tax, in my tax bracket (which would be low, since in our hypothetical situation here, I've been unemployed for a while, and thus earning no money) on $3,144.47 (the 50% of my gains that are taxable) would probably be about 1/3, or $1038, which would leave me with $15,150.95, or about $3880 more money than you.

      Now, if you'd rather give up $3880 than suffer the "headache" of filling out a form to declare those capital gains (it'd take you 10 minutes), then that's your perogative. But to me, $3880 for 10 minutes work is a pretty good bargain. Keep in mind that in this example, you're unemployed. $3880 would buy me at least a couple more months of bills, in a pinch.

      And of course, keep in mind that that's during a *bad* period. During a normal economic period, you could expect to easily realize 8-10% gains, which would of course work out to far more money
      (roughly $13,000 after taxes and fees, in this example).

      Clearly, it is far, far better to invest that money than to let it sit and rot in a savings account. Even after all the fees and taxes are factored in, the potential gains are much greater in the long run.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    11. Re:Some questions and observations... by nojomofo · · Score: 1

      If you have 6 months worth of living expenses saved up ($15,000+ for me), just sitting in an account somewhere, "just in case," then you're an idiot.

      You're sticking words in other peoples' mouths. Nowhere did he say that you should have 6 months of expenses in cash or completely liquid form. You should, however, have 6 months worth of assets that can be liquidated in enough time for emergency purposes such as layoffs. The point being that you shouldn't burn each paycheck as soon as you get it.

    12. Re:Some questions and observations... by heathrow · · Score: 1

      I think he would be smart enough to have invested the emergency fund into an interest bearing account. (Money markets immediately spring to mind.)

      Playing with retirement money is foolish. The tax implications if you gamble poorly are hideous.

      --
      Beauty is truth, truth beauty. That is all ye need to know on Earth, besides TCP/IP.
    13. Re:Some questions and observations... by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      If you're raking it in, put that money into mutual funds.

      You're going to put emergency fund money into a mutual fund?

      That's far more stupid than having the money sitting under a mattress.

      Your examples don't hold up. An emergency fund is not for 10 years from now -- it's for right NOW. The entire point is that you cannot be sure when you will need the money, so it must be reasonably accessible and you must be assured that it will not decrease in value. You cannot make that second assurance with mutual funds. What if you'd invested your emergency fund in 1999? Well, you'd be rather screwed now if you needed it, with values down anywhere from 10-50%.

      Want to invest the money? Fine. Put it in a money market fund and then dribble it into short term CD's (3-6 month, 12 month only if you can get a reasonable rotation going between 4-6 CDs, and enough money in the MM to make it until the next CD matures).

      And touching retirement money in 401k's, IRAs (ROTH or otherwise), etc. is about the stupidiest thing you can do, period. It's a wonderful way to screw yourself forever, especially since you wind up with roughly $.55 on the dollar after taxes and penalties.

      Oh, and BTW, you're commiting fraud if you touch that line of credit once you're laid off. Substantial change in your financial condition, and the line of credit would be revoked if the bank knew about it. Not informing the bank is a violation of the contract in and of itself. Sure, you can do it, and you can probably get away with it, but woe unto you if you don't.

      As I said, I've been unemployed before. It's looking like my wife is going to be unemployed shortly since her company has axed her entire division. But we have enough liquid assets and enough money in other forms that it's not an issue. Plus we can live on my salary alone if need be (oh, and she's making more than I do right now).

    14. Re:Some questions and observations... by Kombat · · Score: 1

      You're going to put emergency fund money into a mutual fund?

      Sure, why not? Obviously not a risky one though. There are very stable, very low risk mutual funds that consistently yield around 5-6%, even in a down market like this one. Of course, during a bull market, you'll still only likely be getting 5-6%, but my point is that that beats the hell out of the 1% you'd get by letting that money rot in a savings account.

      An emergency fund is not for 10 years from now -- it's for right NOW

      Yes, what's your point? In my example, in the "right now" as you put it (i.e., the beginning of the example), both of my fictional people had the same amount of money - $15,000. If an emergency comes up "right NOW", then they'd both be equally well-equipped to weather it. But if things went well for a while, then in the long run, my way would prove to be better.

      As for your comment about the money being easily accessible and not decreasing in value, unregistered mutual funds are easily accessible (it might take a week, tops, to get at that money - that's what the line of credit is for), and they are stable, if you stick to the solid, low-risk ones.

      What if you'd invested your emergency fund in 1999? Well, you'd be rather screwed now if you needed it, with values down anywhere from 10-50%.


      Some funds have gone up in that period. Gold, oil, money markets - the low-risk mutual funds will be a balanced mix of these rock-solid economic components. Don't misinterpret me - I'm not saying you should put your emergency fund into Cisco stock, or the CIBC Technology Fund. I'm advocating putting that money in a low-risk, low-yield mutual fund.

      And touching retirement money in 401k's, IRAs (ROTH or otherwise), etc. is about the stupidiest thing you can do, period.

      I'm not talking about taking money from registered funds. I'm not completely familiar with IRAs and 401k's, but here in Canada, the analogous investment vehicle is an RRSP, which has an annual maximum contribution limit. So you max that out (about 10 grand), and sure, that's your "untouchable" retirement money. But after that, you put your emergency money in unregistered investments.

      Incidentally, I wouldn't say touching your retirement money is the "stupidest thing you can do." I borrowed part of my home's down payment from my RRSP. If I hadn't done that, we wouldn't have been able to afford the house. Under this plan, I have 10 years to pay it all back. In my case, this worked out in my favour, since a large part of my RRSP is Nortel stock (I'm a former Nortel employee, company matching contributions and all that). If I'd left that money in there, it would have shrunk down to next to nothing. Instead, I now have that equity in my house, which has gone up in value by about 10% in 2 years, by comparison. But of course, I concede that this is merely a gamble that worked out in my favour, and doesn't constitute any investment advice.

      Oh, and BTW, you're commiting fraud if you touch that line of credit once you're laid off.

      I'm not so sure about that. Your line of credit is based on many factors, not just your employment status. In my case, my home equity and existing assets (combined with my employed spouse) would most likely work in my favour, if I were to be laid off, and they wouldn't revoke my credit line. Besides, like I said, you'd only need to use it until you get at that mutual fund money, which would take maybe a week, tops. Then you pay the line of credit back.

      And if you need that much money that soon after being laid off, and can't wait a week, then you are living DANGEROUSLY close to your means, and have somehow managed to find a region below "paycheck-to-paycheck," which I can only assume would be called "sub-paycheck-to-paycheck." :) For example, if I were to get laid off, it would take almost a month for our savings account (the one the bills all

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  16. Just be careful about your co-workers by AnotherSteve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That kind of thing is cool to talk about, but it is like starting a union. If someone in the department doesn't walk out, then you're out of work and you've handed them a promotion. So stick together. Everyone should hand in their resignation at the same time. Better impact that way, anyhow.

    --
    Information wants to be $1.98/lb.
    1. Re:Just be careful about your co-workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you really care at that point? sheesh

    2. Re:Just be careful about your co-workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting sheep to stick together and act together, especially in IT, is an art form. People are far too "every man for himself" - just look at politics...

  17. Walking out together? by Violet+Null · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you planning on walking out with your coworkers and forming a company of your own? Because, if you're not, there's no point in doing it in unison. Sure, you might wake someone at the company up, but more than likely they won't care, and even if they did, it's too late for you. Meanwhile, you're left holding the bag, as it were, with no job.

    If the situation is that bad, you should do the normal route: look for a job while keeping yours. If/when you find another job, you quit. Your coworkers can all do the same. Things'll work out much better if you only bail when you have a parachute, and, no matter how bad your job is, it's better than no job at all.

    1. Re:Walking out together? by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Things'll work out much better if you only bail when you have a parachute, and, no matter how bad your job is, it's better than no job at all.

      Well, this guy did have a parachute, but he bailed by getting rid of it!

  18. Fire them all? Seriously? by dewboy · · Score: 1

    If the company was in that bad of a position, do you think that they'd want to go through the process of firing their best workers, rehiring equally skilled workers, and then going through the time-consuming process of retraining them. The entire retraining time is money lost, and the company could go under.

  19. Haven't done this myself but ... by OMG · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A close friend of mine worked for a local ISP. The ISP got bought by a bigger company. The new management decided to replaces all unix mail-systems with MS Exchange.

    The complete technical department from the "old" left the company within days.

    Management will never learn ...

    1. Re:Haven't done this myself but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bigger company then drops in a couple cheap MCSEs and is glad to be rid of the unix geeks. There are people cheaper and will appreciate having a job.

    2. Re:Haven't done this myself but ... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Can't spell or write these people either. Work quality suffer.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    3. Re:Haven't done this myself but ... by OMG · · Score: 1

      "... cheap MCSEs ... cheaper people will appreciate having a job."

      With WHICH customers ?
      If you didn't get it: (I am not kidding) the customer base this ISP had was gone a month later. Now, WHICH job do these MCSEs still have ?

    4. Re:Haven't done this myself but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admit it -- Management was so forward thinking to embrace X.400 mail and the awesome potential of the OSINet. You small minded Unix people couldn't cope. Next step: Move the FTP servers to OpenVMS!

      Seriously, not even Microsoft ever recommended Exchange for Internet mail (used to have a product called MS CIMS for that), so the ISP was doomed for pure stupidity, not MS-luvin in particular. They would have managed to lose all their customers even with Unix and the same staff.

    5. Re:Haven't done this myself but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was you company bought by Galaxy Internet by any chance

    6. Re:Haven't done this myself but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The product is called MCIS and worked just fine. I am so sick of hearing how unix is better for ISPs. Both OSes have their uses, but saying that unix is THE OS for an ISP is pure Bullshit. I would run Imail on win32 before I would even dream of using sendmail(or variants) on *nix.

    7. Re:Haven't done this myself but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were gone within a month because of the volume of viruses that flooded into their mailboxes. Most of them had to reinstall the OS on their box and hope their data backups were secure.

  20. What's the outcome? by computerme · · Score: 2, Insightful

    oh i don't know, say a million different outcomes for a million different people. most likely long bouts of unemployment. Just because you can program (or think you can) does not mean you can run a company. next stop: dose of reality.

  21. Let me guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You work for EDS?

    1. Re:Let me guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he works for SCO!

    2. Re:Let me guess. by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      Think SCO

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    3. Re:Let me guess. by rcr484 · · Score: 1

      I worked for EDS. Just got hired by the client when EDS incompetently lost the contract. Four of us were approached by the client, so we just kept quiet when the company kept asking about our next assignments. For us it was go on the road for NMCI or quit. We quit together, all got the same jobs we had before, but for a better boss and much more respectable company.

      Middle management sucks!

    4. Re:Let me guess. by Simoriah · · Score: 1

      OMG! I just spit DrPepper at my laptop. While I've been reading this, I couldn't help but think, "Wow. That sounds like the shit I put up with at EDS." Then times got really tough and they laid me off. Then contested the unemployment. Then kicked the CEO in the ass and paid him 38M on the way out. . . And they somehow saved money by laying off a 38k/year network admin? Way to go, management!

      My advice rides with many others'... Find a new job, tell them you can start on the following Monday and Friday evening, tell your current boss to dig in... cause he's got to fill your shoes immediately.

      Unemployment sucks. You learn to despise ramen noodles and PB&J. I recommend against going jobless for the sake of the bit ..|.., to the company.

      --
      "It compiles, SHIP IT!" -Overheard at Microsoft's development lab
    5. Re:Let me guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Dick was a _real_ Dick. I'm still with them, but not for a long time I guess. EDS just sucks.

    6. Re:Let me guess. by Simoriah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Heh. We used to say "First we got Les, then we just got Dicked." That, and anytime someone mentioned the word "bonus," we'd reply with "No no no. You mean Bone-Us.

      Long gone are the says of "If you work more than 40 hours a week, your manager isn't doing his job" - Ross Perot

      --
      "It compiles, SHIP IT!" -Overheard at Microsoft's development lab
  22. Be careful... by mixy1plik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back during the big ol' bubble of the late nineties, I worked with a development team that came up with everything that end-users interacted with. Back then, we were doing just as you described- endless hours, little or no compensation... but we all still believed in the dream that was "we'll be millionaires soon enough". Thinking back, we were all in a perfect position to leave and start something on our own.

    NDAs and other such things in your contract might not let you break off "en masse". That is something to be careful of. Make sure you don't have contractual limitations or obligations that could prevent you from making a clean break. Using your collective knowledge and contacts, I think you all have a pretty good shot at making it on your own.

    1. Re:Be careful... by Amoeba+Protozoa · · Score: 1

      I had joined leaving en masse once, not because the place we were leaving was so awful, but because the opportunity we were all given was so good. Yes, you guessed it: it was a lucrative start-up that is now firmly buried beneath the ground.

      Back to the point, when we all left we were all promptly served with court papers on the very grounds that mixy1plik has mentioned. Our new employer paid to fight the suit for us and we won (and we actually counter-sued) on the grounds that we all decided to leave independantly and that in the state of Minnesota it is extremely hard to prevent anybody from earning a living. Essentially, if you prove that what you engineer is just about all you know how to engineer than no-competes and many NDAs will not stand up in court.

      This advice, of course, is completely useless to people who don't have a generous future employer, the will, or the personal funds to potentially fight in court...but somebody may find it interesting or useful!

      Cheers,

      -AP

  23. We did it 1 year ago! by md17 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And there is no looking back. The pay sucks, but the freedom is priceless (atleast until all my credit cards are max'd out). I wouldn't go back if my life depended on it.

  24. This smells like a lawsuit by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Such a coordinated effort smells of a lawsuit from the company against the organizer(s) and possibly participants.

    1. Re:This smells like a lawsuit by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Such a coordinated effort smells of a lawsuit from the company against the organizer(s) and possibly participants.

      What are you, an idiot? Employees are human beings with free will. The company doesn't own them. The freedom to quit your job is fairly well established, and the freedom to tell others why you're quitting (and for them, in turn, to quit as well) is fairly obvious. Furthermore, you cannot file suit against an individual because they organized their coworkers to do something their employer didn't want. If they could, we wouldn't have unions anywhere now would we?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:This smells like a lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been there, done that -- lived through the depositions.

      A coordinated walkout opens you up to legal entanglements. I left a company a few years ago along with five of my buddies (all levels of management and worker) and ended up talking to lawyers for months.

      In our case we were lucky, we left to go to another company who had lawyers on staff who were able to fight of the lawsuit for us. I would have hated to have to hire my own lawyer. Even here (in Texas) which is an "At Will Employment" state, you can be sued for "torturous interference", "failure of fiduciary responsibility", or whatever big words they lawyers come up with.

    3. Re:This smells like a lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with it, but I believe that in the US, if there is no union established, this might actually be a problem.

      What wouldn't be a problem would be if you quit and then told others to quit. But if you start telling other people to quit while you are an employee of the company, that might be a problem.

      This is because of the (IMO flawed) idea that an employee is supposed to represent the interests of the company in any action related to it, and until you have actually quit, this applies to you.

    4. Re:This smells like a lawsuit by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I don't agree with it, but I believe that in the US, if there is no union established, this might actually be a problem. What wouldn't be a problem would be if you quit and then told others to quit. But if you start telling other people to quit while you are an employee of the company, that might be a problem. This is because of the (IMO flawed) idea that an employee is supposed to represent the interests of the company in any action related to it, and until you have actually quit, this applies to you.

      What? There's no law that says an employee has to "represent the [best] interests of the company"! You can go to work every day and randomize the files in the file cabinet, hide the CFO's laptop, and call up the company's biggest clients and tell them that a competitor is a better bet. You know what the company can do? Fire you. Yes, that's about it. You know why? Because there's no law stating that you must be a "good" employee. Furthermore, whether you work there or not is totally irrelevant when it comes to talking other employees into quitting. You can organize workers from now until the cows come home and there isn't a damn thing they can do about it within the law. They can't even fire you for it! Well, they might, but they're not supposed to. Point is, the law is very clear about this. Companies don't own their employees, they only hire them.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  25. Don't do it! by stevew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look - if you are going to jump ship -GREAT! Only be a little smart and find another job before you jump.

    I know it would give you great satisfaction to flip off the boss and walk as a group. Yet, the economic reality today says that is a really dumb idea. If you don't like your current position, at least have another place to land before you toss it.

    Further, it is HIGHLY suggested that even though you don't like the place, that you don't burn bridges. What are the chances you are going to work with some of the managers/people above you in the future (answer from 25 years in the business - 100%) Leave gracefully and your career will do better in the long run.

    --
    Have you compiled your kernel today??
    1. Re:Don't do it! by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      One time I just up and quit my job in disgust. While living at home my dad said, "Son, life is like Tarzan swinging thru the jungle - you have to make sure you've got a hold on the next vine before you let go of the last".

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    2. Re:Don't do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this crap about getting a job first. If the job sucks then split. If I remember right the Emancipation Proclaimation freed all you US'ers. I've been fired from shitty jobs and loved it. I've up and quit jobs i didn't like and moved on. If you're resourcefull you can alwas find something. My salary from last job to current went down about 10K/annum. My new job is a blast. Except for dealing with win98 everyday!

      Quality of life is worth more then any paycheck!

    3. Re:Don't do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The momentary pleasure you shall receive will not be worth the infinite hassle that these people shall bring down upon you.

      1: Slow down the work. Take the hassle of jerk managers yelling when things don't happen. Simply respond with: "you could actually pitch in and *do* some of this work".

      2: Start looking for another job. In a very serious way, not just sending emails, but making contacts. Assume your company is circling the drain at this point.

      3: Once your leads start panning out, and you're getting interviews, don't flip these people off, but start pointing out their dishonesty to their face. A lot of managers lie because their power protects them, and nothing infuriates them more than having it pointed out. Make friends with someone up the food chain: "You're complaining about him, but he's done fine work for me Bob, what's the real problem here?". When you're given changing or bogus requirements or bogus deadlines, point them out. Let a few fake deadlines pass and find out if someone was making them just to squeeze your balls. When the manager does something incredibly stupid, let it screw up even further, then send mail to *his* boss describing how he is responsible for this (Well, Bob said (attached email) that there wasn't enough time to back up the server before moving it)

      Remember, blaming your subordinates to upper management for problems is considered just as bad form as blaming your manager. Once you realize that there's no actual reason to respect this troll, you shall gain enlightenment.

      4: Between enough of slowing down work, and being a pain (and enjoying it), you should be able to time getting laid off with severance at just the time you start your new job.

      I once saw a team walk out to get their manager fired, and the entire team was replaced with consultants. I once saw a team threaten to walk out, and the manager was moved laterally, but I have only once seen a manager actually fired, and it was a concerted effort by a number of people to actually make him look like an idiot. It took four *months*, and he nearly sank a *critical* project during it. What got him booted was lying to the CEO, when we had the real information documented. "It's strange that he said that Steve, because that contradicts this email he sent earlier".

  26. Not the answer we want to hear, but... by mtrupe · · Score: 1

    Given the current state of tech jobs (supply and demand), I think the company would laugh and hire a bunch more techies who would be more than willing to take your job. The way tech employees are treated is directly affected by the market. An employer will treat you as crappy as possible (ie, low pay, lots of overtime) because they can.

    As much as I support capitalism, lets face it, the company doesn't exist to create happy employees. It exists to turn a profit. If keeping employees happy in order to keep them productive is necessary, the employer will do so. The problem, right now, is that a happy employee is an employed employee. It will get better (and then worse, and then better, and so on...)

    1. Re:Not the answer we want to hear, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replacing people is still expensive for a company, especially when a large group leaves and there are not even enough people to coach the new ones...

    2. Re:Not the answer we want to hear, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. It was taxes.

  27. Could be risky in this market, but . . . . by LazloToth · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I do know of a group that pulled it off very nicely, and they - - as well as the former (university)employer were, and are, happy. The spinoff group was able to take on consulting jobs while, at the same time, selling their services back to the university. The university was happy because they no longer had to offer benefits, do payroll, etc. After more than two years, this arrangement is still working out for everyone involved. Sorry, I can't give names, but the university in question is a top-rated one in the southeast, and the IT group in question primarily provided web and data management services.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  28. do it! walkout! by havaloc · · Score: 1

    A long (10+ years) while ago, at my second job at a major fast food chain, we had this new manager who was a complete jerk. He had an abusive personality, and thought he was above us. So while he was in the walk in freezer, me and two other co-workers just left. What a rush! The next day I called work to see if we still had a job.

    The other manager said, I see you are on the schedule, so see you at 5.

    The results? The mean manager guy was nice to us and nothing bad happened. Work was much more reasonable and not so unpleasant. And note, this was at a fast food place, where people are easily replacable.

  29. Walk outs by grub · · Score: 1


    1: Walk out of job.
    2: "Burn bridges" on way out.
    3: Rent Office Space and watch several times.
    4: Be happy and do what you enjoy without being a slave.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  30. Just remember ... by Alranor · · Score: 5, Funny

    discarded Pizza boxes are an inexpensive source of Cheese.

  31. Pinko commie by duffbeer703 · · Score: 3, Funny

    What are you going to suggest next, labor unions? Do you think that you and your buddies are entitled to be treated like human beings?

    If you were a real man, you'd volunteer to work 80 hour weeks and come up with a plan to replace all of your colleagues with contract developers from India and Romania.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Pinko commie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      couldn't Perl do their job for free?

    2. Re:Pinko commie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Real men would kill the management in a bloody coup and take over. Why start your own company when you can seize power in this one?

    3. Re:Pinko commie by Life2Short · · Score: 2, Funny

      couldn't Perl do their job for free?

      Probably, but she always makes such an ass of herself at office parties...
    4. Re:Pinko commie by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > What are you going to suggest next, labor unions?

      Seems to me that what is being suggested here -- forming a company and then negotiating to sell your services back to your former employer -- amounts to just that. And that's just fine.

      > Do you think that you and your buddies are
      > entitled to be treated like human beings?

      They're entitled to whatever terms they can and will negotiate.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  32. Better yet!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move country. TO one where you have EMPLOYEE RIGHTS.

  33. We sort of did this by zackbar · · Score: 1

    The company got bought and killed all our projects. Then they lied and said they weren't closing our office (the purchaser had another office 15 miles away.) 3 months later, they announced they were closing our office.

    Pretty much our entire department quit, but we didn't decide to do it as a group. Everyone just found other jobs. The only ones left were a DBA workaholic and an immigrant woman who spent most of her time using AOL over the company internet.

  34. Employers have the upper hand now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Bad economy
    2) Surplus domestic Labor
    3) Outsourcing
    4) Guest workers

    You're a commodity now, buddy.
    PHB wins again.

    Vote Bush !!!

  35. Mo' Money Mo' Money by gato_mato · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Had this happen not too long ago. Simple We walked out & formed our own company. The old employer realized that they could not stay afloat without us and contracted us do do the same job as before through our new company. The results - Limited work hours (read 40-50 hours/week instead of the insane bull of 70 to 80), More money (even after we pay taxes, FICA, etc.), our own company (we hold equal shares), and more contracts from other places that needed the same kind of service. The down side - we where living in VERY thin budget for ab out 3 months while it all got setup and settled down.

    Gato

    1. Re:Mo' Money Mo' Money by geekinexile · · Score: 1

      Sounds pretty good, but I will bet your old employer is doing whatever they can to find another source for your service, since total reliance on a monopoly supplier is too risky. Glad to hear you have other accounts, you'll need them.

  36. What? by jhigh · · Score: 1

    given unreasonable amounts of work

    Posting on Slashdot is work?

    --
    Social Engineering Expert: Because there is no patch for stupidity.
  37. i did it by greenalbatros · · Score: 2, Funny

    now i read slashdot all day.

    --
    this sig steers like a cow. and i can prove it
    1. Re:i did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too, only problem is that the library limits me to one hour blocks...

  38. I suppose... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suppose that it depends on whether you're walking out for good, or just as a work stoppage to show them you're important. I'll assume from the title, you're talking the former.

    The problem with the latter is that if the company really is in trouble, you'll be putting the nails in its coffin.

    In this job market, I would personally not be too excited about the prospect of a job hunt. I've got friends who have been actively looking for over 6 months - it's kinda rough.

    Another thing to consider is that some might just decide to let you all walk, and feign some form of loyalty to the company... it's a win-win for them. If the company survives, their "loyalty" will be rewarded, and if it crashes and burns, they will be eligible to collect unemployment while those who quit will not.

    (just some random thoughts)

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  39. A few cliches... by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 1

    The grass is always greener.... Everyone is expendable.

    1. Re:A few cliches... by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      The cemetery is full of indisposable people.

  40. Know your Role and Shut your Mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this life you are an Employer, employee or unemployed. Pick one and stop bitching

    1. Re:Know your Role and Shut your Mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And while you're at it, always look on the sunny side of life.

      Cheers!

  41. don't quit--slow down instead by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why should you organize yourselves just to quit. A better solution is to quietly agree to stop working so hard. Perhaps you could slowly start leaving earlier and/or coming later until you get back to 40 hrs/week.

    Just a thought..

    --

    nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

  42. Please Let Me Know When You Do This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'll take your job. Most likely for less than they're paying you. I'm guessing I have more experience than you as well.

    ...and I know I have a better attitude.

    Seriously, post here when you're done posing. My bags have been packed and ready to go for nearly five months. Airfare's pretty good right about now, so I'm psyched...

  43. Cool, I need work by Loctavius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Listen, with so many geeks like us out of work, some of us having been looking for 2 years now, walking out is a BAD thing. If you don't have another job lined up already, you might as well suck it up. if not, I am looking for work, as are others.

    --
    "My ship came in, but was bombed by terrorists in port and sank." - Me
  44. When will you ever learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most companies do not care about the workers. Anyone can be replaced. You work and get paid. If you do not like, deal with it or move on. Your group mentailty is interesting. All it will lead to is acting as a group and getting someone that really does not want to lose their income out of work.
    Here is a better approach: Tell your employer that you are unhappy and will be forced to find other employment if the working conditions do not improve... Problem with this is, in todays economic situation someone will come and do your job better and cheaper. ;) Where do you work? I know 3 people hungry for a paycheck.

  45. HR Perspectives by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My father is a 'big wig' in HR. We've seen many a strikes in the past.
    Dealing with a union is nice, cause its a one-on-one arguement and you can get things moving that way.
    But if everyone leaves in your situation, they need to know why you left, and who to talk to make things right.

    Another point, during strikes, about 25% of the time, the people were simply replaced.
    You are talking about a poor IT economy. Lots of unemployeed geeks that just want a job, even if its 50-60 hour weeks (as long as you can put food on the table).

    The bottom line? Don't even think about doing this unless you are prepared not to come back.
    You're better off just doing the work, and talking to management about compensation.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:HR Perspectives by khallow · · Score: 1
      The bottom line? Don't even think about doing this unless you are prepared not to come back. You're better off just doing the work, and talking to management about compensation.

      Not always. Sometimes things evolve to a nonnegotiable situation.

    2. Re:HR Perspectives by hendridm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > But if everyone leaves in your situation, they need to know why you left, and who to talk to make things right.

      Yeah, assuming they want to make things right. Don't you think if they cared things wouldn't have gotten so bad in the first place?

      Spoken like a typical it's-not-our-fault-the-employees-are-treated-like- shit-but-we're-here-to-make-it-better HR person. So you want to be made aware of the problems? Hmmm, how about starting with PAYING YOUR EMPLOYEES FOR THE WORK THEY DO.

      Like a typical company, you might think that employees are expendable, and they are to a certain extent. But look at a company that has high employee morale vs. a company that has high turnover. Which one do you think is more productive in the long run? It's called human RESOURCES for a reason. Unfortunately, this fact doesn't help the poor proletariat.

      </bitter rant>

    3. Re:HR Perspectives by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      FYI - I'm a coder/techie, not HR. But your bitter rant is spoken like the 'things have gotten bad, I bitch about it to everyone except those that can change things'

      Don't you think if they cared things wouldn't have gotten so bad in the first place?

      Are they even aware of the problem? Has someone confronted them about what's going on?
      Ever heard the expression The squeaky wheel gets the oil? Bitching to me doesn't solve anything, tactfully complaining to your manager, might.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    4. Re:HR Perspectives by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Personally, I'd mod this as flamebait, for even mentioning HR, let alone admitting being related to a HR 'bigwig'.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    5. Re:HR Perspectives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell yeah, we don't want perspectives from the OTHER side!
      Its good to be blind
      Ignorance is bliss

    6. Re:HR Perspectives by starcraftsicko · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, how about starting with PAYING YOUR EMPLOYEES FOR THE WORK THEY DO.

      Well, that would be interesting I'd agree. But just how much is that?

      Everybody, from Bill Gates to your local trash collector thinks that they deserve more money than they currently make. Or at least they should. If they don't then they either are overpaid to begin with or else they have a serious self-esteem problem.

      Quitting and failing to tell management or HR why simply perpetuates the original problem for those that stay behind.

    7. Re:HR Perspectives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, well, how history repeats itself...
      I've always been opposed to trade unions (I live in Germany, and there's not really a job for them to do here). But recent developments in the US have changed my mind. Yes, you do need them. Otherwise you'll always be treated like shit as a worker if the economic climate is bad. Companies have much more oomph than their single employees, so they could pretty much do to them what they want. But if the employees co-operate, the picture changes.

      This system obviously only works if the unions stay moderate. France seems a good example of the opposite...

    8. Re:HR Perspectives by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Another point, during strikes, about 25% of the time, the people were simply replaced."

      thats where the baseball bats come in...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:HR Perspectives by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Quitting and failing to tell management or HR why simply perpetuates the original problem for those that stay behind.

      You can bet if I quit in those sort of circumstances, I'd be suing for unfair dismissal. I'm sure the company would get the message then.

    10. Re:HR Perspectives by hendridm · · Score: 1

      > Ever heard the expression The squeaky wheel gets the oil?

      I agree. However, judging by the summary the poster submitted, it sounds like it's gotten so bad that management simply doesn't care. If a squeaky wheel falls on deaf ears, does it made a sound? It seems to me their discontent for the company should be obvious to management. If my subordinate works 60 hours in a week and I only pay him/her for 40 (assuming he is not salary and entitled to overtime bonuses), don't you think he/she would be a little upset?

      It seems to me applying the Golden Rule might not hurt in this situation.

    11. Re:HR Perspectives by hendridm · · Score: 1

      > Everybody, from Bill Gates to your local trash collector thinks that they deserve more money than they currently make.

      You're right, but it would be nice to be compensated for the hours I work at a minimum. I guess the original poster never made it clear if compensation beyond 40 hours was every part of his employment contract or not. If it is, it seems to be he is entitled to compensation. If not, I guess it's time to find another job. :/

    12. Re:HR Perspectives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bliss is my goal, so if ignorance is the fastest way there, I'll take it. Meanwhile, you're all stressed out for a few years and I have a head start on the whole bliss thing. Let's get together on our deathbeds and reflect back, shall we?

    13. Re:HR Perspectives by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      Ever heard the expression The squeaky wheel gets the oil?

      Ever hear of the expression "The squeaky wheel can be easily replaced?"

      That's what I've been shown in the business world. You don't like your situation, then complain to the boss. But don't complain too much, because it's easier to hire a spineless jellyfish then spend more money on you.

    14. Re:HR Perspectives by TrackDaddy · · Score: 1
      I thought about making disparaging remarks about your father... but I've decided to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he's the one good HR worker in the world. Seriously though, HR is exists the company. Let's stop propagating the lie that HR somehow performs a service to the employees. HR exists to meet the requirements of the various employment laws and to protect the company from violating those laws. Whether the decision in a dispute is in the employee's or management favor, it will not be made on the merits of the arguments. It will be made to benefit the company. End of story.

      So, should the employees go to HR about the problem? Probably not. Unless management is violating the law, HR won't care. The only thing going to HR will do is embarrass management, and make HR start counseling that same management group to get rid of the "unruly" employees in favor of some who are better behaved. Yes, these folks should talk to their management chain, but leave your dad and any other HR people out of it. It will only make the problem worse and create a situation where a solution will be harder to negotiate.

      --
      Run! There's a lobster loose!
  46. Are you unique by barcodez · · Score: 1

    Does you team have skills that you can make money out of if you stick together. Does you team provide a unique service that any other company would want? I suggest you find out before leaving. If the answer is no then you just as good by yourself. If the company is in the shit you say it is they are unlikely to turn around and try and make your life better just to keep you. Good management would, but if the company is that fucked then I'm guessing the management sucks. I would alway recommend trying to find a job before quiting.

    --

    ----
    1. Re:Are you unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is you English fucked up?

  47. At least be smart about it by overshoot · · Score: 2, Informative

    What you're describing is a strike. If you do it right (start organizing the shop, aka unionize) your employer can't legally retaliate. Organizing for a union is also a pretty good way to get the Company's attention; most employers would much rather head off unionization by treating you well than have you organize and then force them to treat you well anyway.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:At least be smart about it by jstott · · Score: 1
      What you're describing is a strike.

      No, it isn't. A strike is a work stoppage, with the full intention to go back to work for the company as soon as the worker's demands are met.

      This is a damn the torpedoes, burn the bridges, no looking back, mass exodus. Completely different beast in terms of intent, goals, and legal protections.

      -JS

      --
      Vanity of vanities, all is vanity...
  48. Walking out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the current job market where I live, and the state of my personal network, it would be economic suicide. I might be able to get a new position at Radio Shack but not much more.

    However, at my current job, there are only three programmers. All of us are deeply dissatisfied. If we all left, as a group, or because we each decided Radio Shack and Circuit City beats what we are doing now, the company would be in a world of hurt.

    Offering services as a group looks more businesslike than offering services solo. It gives potential customers a better feeling. And if it didn't work, we could go through night clerk training at 7-11 together!

    1. Re:Walking out by ambisinistral · · Score: 1

      No offense boss, but if the only job you and your fellow "programmers" could get was Radio Shack -- then your current employers could probably replace you with chimps and not miss a beat.

      --

      deserve's got nothing to do with it...

  49. Why help them? by Fratz · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like what you have in mind will do some of their cutbacks for them, starting with you... Just search for a better job and leave. If there are no better jobs, re-evaluate your strategy.

    --
    -- Fratz, human
  50. Check Your Contracts by NousCS · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just signed a contract saying that I wouldn't get together with others in the company and quit. If a bunch of you quit at once and the company can prove that you guys talked to each other about quiting it can do such things as, keep your last pay-check, sue you for damages, etc. I hope you didn't use your company email.

    1. Re:Check Your Contracts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't let this sort of thinking stop you. It is rarely worth it for a company to do this. And it is even more unlikely when the company is hurting. Why? Because lawsuits are expensive, and they're not going to get much out of you.

      Walkouts happen all the time. Lawsuits against ex-employees based on non-competes and similar are very rare.

      If you have trouble breaking an (IMHO bogus) agreement like this, remember that the company chose not to hold up their side by not paying you fairly for your work.

  51. Maybe they should form a Union by KyleNicholson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have never understood why so many IT employees are afraid of forming a Union. There are limitations, like not geting as big of a raise during boom times. But you have more control over overtime, and standard set raises even during slow times. Is it just my percention of IT people being anti union or is it me?

    1. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgive my ignorance, but aren't unions for hourly/non-exempt people? Most IT folks are salaried/exempt.

    2. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mainly because Unions are the devil? Back in the 30's and 40's where workplace safety, etc, were issues, unions had their place.

      Now, if the employees under me were to form a union, and walk out on strike, I'd fire them all and replace them with many of the tech related workers who are unemployed now.

      I think it's funny when manual labor unions strike - not like it's tough to find people to pickup stuff, train them on forklift usage, etc, to replace the over paid, over compensated, and over-benefitted due to the unions.

      Just remember, unions cost the CONSUMER more money - it's US that pays for all the stipends that have to be given in to unions.

    3. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by jd142 · · Score: 1

      So who says that salaried/exempt people can't unionize? Seriously, is it a law or something?

    4. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by jd142 · · Score: 1

      Is it just my percention of IT people being anti union or is it me?

      There is a perception that many on /. tend towards libertarian views and completely free market. It isn't hard to see why there is that perception after reading through the tax article earlier today. People who tend to be libertarian/free-market also tend to be anti-union. There are all sorts of exceptions of course, but the tendancy is there.

    5. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by Jens_UK · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Unions (eg. UAW, Teachers' Unions) have a tendency to be seniority rather than merit based. So when layoffs do come, whoever was hired last goes first, whether or not they are better/more qualified than others hired before them.

      Common unions also divorce pay from skill/effort, and instead you must accumulate years rather than say, do good work, to get your raise and extra vacation.

      A little extra bitter, as my wife the teacher was hired five days before the school year, and per union contract is first on the chopping block. BTW, the union will be fighting for a 2% raise for the remaining teachers in the district. Do the math, and that's most of the cut teachers' salaries. A union looks out for its interests, not necessarily those of the employees.

    6. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by Jens_UK · · Score: 1

      It's not a law. Salaried folks can be union. Some of the finance people at a large company I'm familiar with are union. It's just less common, perhaps because sitting long hours at a desk doesn't beat you up as much as laying bricks or working an assembly line.

    7. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But you have more control over overtime, and standard set raises even during slow times. Is it just my percention of IT people being anti union or is it me?

      You only need to unionize if your personal value is close to zero. If you bring any kind of value to the company, and you actually work, then you can negotiate all of these things on your own. Unions are for the lazy and the incompetent.

    8. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Most on /. are stupid college kids and 20-somethings who lack a clue and have an inflated ego.

      People with big egos (even clueless people) think that they are indispensible because they can string something together with Perl or setup a linux system. They usually don't have families, and if they do, they value their jobs higher than their family.

      That's why you can talk to some exploited "department manager" at Wal-Mart who is getting paid for 40 hours of work @ $9/hour to work 60 hours and week and they'll tell you how wonderful their job is and how awful unions are. If you tell someone that they are important, eventually they will believe it.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    9. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by crazyphilman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's true; most of the IT people I know (who are still in private industry -- I work for the government and we're ALL unionized, thank GOD) are vaguely horrified by the idea of unionization. I think it derives mostly from the following misconceptions fuelled by industry propaganda:

      1. Many in IT have an elevated sense of their skill's value -- they've been conditioned by society to believe in the "rich geek" myth, despite the fact that only a small fraction of the real geeks out there make more than 100K (and most are way, way down in the 30-50K range these days, if they even make that). So they have a sort of weird, "industry player" mentality, despite the fact that they're actually besieged by a crummy economy and lousy employer practices, and have no power whatsoever.

      2. Many of the IT staff I've met don't like unions because it reminds them of their father's "day jobs" and the idea of turning out like their fathers (30 years at the same shop, standard work week, etc) horrifies them on at least a subconscious level. This is an ego thing. They want to be hip, trendy, capitalists, and talk about money. It's all go, go, go. They don't want to be hippie socialists! They're professionals! Meanwhile, all us hippie socialists are on vacation or working our humane, 40-hour work-weeks, spending time with our kids (who actually recognize us and don't call the nanny "mommy"), and wondering why the non-union guys have such a stick up their butts. Then, we live to a ripe old age, retired and fishing, long after all the stress-freaks have died from heart attacks, cancer, and aneurisms in their '50s after a joyless life of overwork. It boggles the mind -- but I'm getting sidetracked. ;)

      3. Many of the people in IT tend to think that they're going to be denied raises and perks because a union is seniority-based. But they don't factor in the fact that they're not getting raises and perks these days anyway. At least in a union, they'd have a standard yearly raise, but they don't see it. And, how are they going to get raises and perks when their position is outsourced? If they were in a union, it'd be really hard for the company to get away with that.

      Add it all together, and IT staff are just basically hobbling themselves because of myths and nonsense. Their lives would be SO much BETTER if they were unionized. Their quality of life would improve by leaps and bounds. It's frustrating, because even when you tell them what they could have, they just shake their heads, squint their eyes, and say, "yeaaaaaah... whatever". Oh, well, what can you do?

      It's pointless, because hardly anyone will listen, but here's another try:

      IF YOU UNIONIZE, YOU'LL USUALLY GET:

      1. A 40-hour work week, with time and a half for overtime, double time on sundays and holidays, and the potential for even MORE when holidays and weekends and overtime converge.

      2. Full medical, dental, vision, and mental health benefits.

      3. A REAL retirement plan -- a full pension, not some wussy 401(k) that'll be plundered by the CEO at first opportunity.

      4. Enough sick days and personal days during the year to keep you out of trouble if you get put on your back by the flu.

      5. Regular raises to match the inflation rate (at least), so you're not losing money over time due to the economy.

      6. Most important of all -- a grievance procedure for those times when a manager forgets himself and tries to step over the line. When you're in a union, they HAVE to treat you with respect, or it's their ass. This alone is worth unionization. It also means you can't be fired unless you actually do something to deserve it, and layoffs can't be handed down without the company going through a whole negotiation process.

      Being in a union means you're treated fairly, whether the company or your manager likes it or not.

      Being in a union means that you're not alone against management -- you're shoulder to shoulder with all your coworkers (and, of course, the tens of thousands of p

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    10. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by ckaminski · · Score: 1
      3. A REAL retirement plan -- a full pension, not some wussy 401(k) that'll be plundered by the CEO at first opportunity.

      And exactly HOW does a CEO plunder a 401K?? Is this sorta like Congress plundering Social Security??

    11. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to be in a union. With my pension, I don't have to sweat social security. I *KNOW* I'm going to be taken care of. As should we all.

      I wouldn't want to work for a company that didn't repay my loyalty with security in my old age... Of course, most non-union shops barely give their workers a 401K nowadays, and it's become "common knowledge" that most companies would rather a worker stay only three to five years at most. I've heard that recruiters are suspicious of anyone staying at a company longer than 3 years. I'll be at MINE for thirty (God willing).

      But, you probably don't like unions. That's ok. I mentioned guys like you in my original post. No hard feelings! I can see you nodding and saying, "yeaaah, right" in my mind's eye.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    12. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by geekee · · Score: 1

      I don't think free-market == anti-union. In a free society, if workers for a company want to organize and speak with one voice, hoping the hassle of firing and then hiring and training new workers for a company is worse than giving in to the union demands, they should have a right to do so.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    13. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by jd142 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I didn't say that free-market == aint-union, I said that people who are libertarian/free marketers *tend* to be anti-union. Traditionally, Republicans have tended towards hands off towards business (free marketers) and anti-union positions. For example, Reagan's firing of the air traffic controllers for going on strike.

    14. Re:Maybe they should form a Union by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't presume to think you know me and my thoughts based on a simple question about how a CEO can raid a 401K. For the record, I don't dislike unions, but I am on the fence regarding their proliferation in the tech industry.

      Not to burst your bubble, but your pension isn't 100% safe either. Plenty of CEO and boardmember fraud could leave your pension penniless, (as one Massachusetts pension program discovered last year).

  52. sometimes you just think you are important by gooofy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    probably this doesn't apply in your case but i think it is a good idea to double-check wheter you and your departement are really that important for the company or if the company just wants you to think you are important to make you work even harder (some form of motivation).

    i used to work for a small software company and me and a few of my coworkers (basically half of the development departement) decided that it was time to move on. it was really hard to quit as the boss made promises and tried to persuade each one of us to stay telling us how important we were. well, eventually we all quit and quickly found new jobs and afaik all of us are happy with the new jobs - and guess what? the old company still exists and is better than ever, even during this economic crisis.

    so, at least from my point of view the bottom line here is: if you feel it is time to move on, move on. this is your life and you have to take care of it, not your company. and it is not that unlikely that both sides will profit from that.

    --
    time is a funny concept
  53. This worked for us by UncleSocks · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Hi,

    A number of years ago, I was working at a really innovative company. The technical chalenges were great etc... However, I and my fellow engineers began to realize that our immediate manager was a jerk (made false statements to management, political, concerned more with his image than the product).


    One of us talked with the manager about these perceived shortcomings, and he reacted _very_ defensively and hostile. We then lost confidence we could improve his management style.


    Two of our team quit and returned to their former company.


    The rest of us were considering doing the same, but we liked the company. Instead of quitting, we went to our department head. We explained our problem, and why our peers had quit. We said, either the lying fellow goes or we go.


    Two weeks later we had a new manager and were from then on as happy as clams.


    This was a 'pre dot com boom' time, but I would do the same thing now if the problem reoccured. If your team is _really_ valuable, then the company will do what is necessary to keep you happy. If your team isn't that valuable, improve your skills and contribution until it is valuable.

    1. Re:This worked for us by Admiral1973 · · Score: 1
      The trouble with your solution is office politics. Often, the manager with whom the staff has a problem is seen differently by the manager's boss. In my experience, the manager can turn the dissent around and make it look like the staff is the problem, not the manager. This tactic usually results in the staff leaving, often through firings or forcing people to leave by reassigning them to unpleasant duties. In my office, there's one manager who has a bad reputation among most of the staff. But his boss must have a great opinion of him, because the manager has been here for years and almost always gets his way. People who work under him who have issues with him end up leaving or assigned to other divisions. I'm just glad I don't work for him, and I'd think seriously about leaving if he became my boss.

      I realize that the point of your meeting with the dept. head was the "he goes or we go" ultimatum. My point is that, like most of the other posters have mentioned, if you're going to try this tactic, you'd better be prepared right away to follow through on your threat. Have other opportunities lined up, have your personal finances in order, insurance ready, etc. Because you might find yourself out of a job before you're ready to be out on the street.

      --
      Lousy minor setbacks! This world sucks! -- Homer Simpson
  54. Unionize by funkman · · Score: 1

    Try to form a union or join a union. The mere threat of unionizing might help. (Or quicken the pace of outsourcing your whole dept)

  55. Alternatives by Harik · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Walk out each day after 8 hours. No compensation for overtime? No overtime. Something breaks while you're on (unpaid) call? Wait till monday morning to fix it. Let them know that you're going to treat the company as it treats you. If the entire department does that there's pretty much nothing they can do about it. They can't fire you for cause in that situation, the amount they'd have to pay in wrongful termination would be staggering.

    Would you like to try to convince a judge and jury that these 'lazy' workers were fired because they refused to work unpaid overtime? Didn't think so.

    --Dan

    1. Re:Alternatives by David+E.+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This depends very much upon your jurisdiction. At least in my part of the United States (and I think this actually is a state law, not a federal law), if you're a "bona fide professional" -- a vague description, but most IT people would be included -- and paid on a salary basis instead of a per-hour basis, they're not required to pay you for overtime.


      This is why, even though I've been given the opportunity to become a salaried employee (with a ~5k/year raise) at the current job, I've declined. I end up working enough overtime that the pay raise really isn't that spectacular, and the ability to leave my work at the office is actually quite refreshing.

    2. Re:Alternatives by sporty · · Score: 1

      That depends. If you are working salary, you aren't necessarily being paid to be ther efrom 9-5 or whatever.

      It's a culture thing usually. I.e. for sysadmin's, usally it means carrying around a pager or cell, being called on weekends etc, and usually getting compensated.

      For developers, sometimes, there is no compensation for donig more hours than doing less hours in the week when work is slow.

      So becareful how you decide to work to the letter. It can bite you in strange ways if you dont' read your employee handbook and contract.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    3. Re:Alternatives by Patersmith · · Score: 1


      What about this "at-will employment" stuff? I'm not American so I really don't know for sure, but can't a company let you go for no particular reason at all in states that have at-will employment?

      any information at all about this would be appreciated. I really am curious...

    4. Re:Alternatives by swillden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      can't a company let you go for no particular reason at all in states that have at-will employment?

      Pretty much, unless you're a member of a recognized minority group, or old (which is relative). If you fall into one of these categories you can probably sue succesfully, claiming discrimination -- unless a bunch of non-minority types were let go as well.

      The flip side, of course, is that in at-will states, you can also leave at any time and the employer has basically no recourse, regardless of what pieces of paper you may have signed. In particular, non-compete agreements are worth very little in at-will states.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:Alternatives by swillden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I should clarify: I am not a lawyer, but I did have occasion to talk these issues over very seriously with an attorney who specializes in employment cases, and I'm relaying what she told me.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Alternatives by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      This depends very much upon your jurisdiction. At least in my part of the United States (and I think this actually is a state law, not a federal law), ...

      This is a question that someone needs to talk to a lawyer about. There are Federal laws, state laws, and then there are Federal laws that all the states must implement if they want to get that money from Washington.

      ... if you're a "bona fide professional" -- a vague description, but most IT people would be included -- and paid on a salary basis instead of a per-hour basis, they're not required to pay you for overtime.

      This would certainly be wrong in Alaska. In Alaska, a ``bona fide professional'' is someone who holds a professional license, including without limitation lawyers, licensed professional engineers and physicians. I believe that merchant marine officers are NOT in that category, even though they hold professional licenses, though I could be wrong. CERTAINLY IT people would NOT be included.

      In Alaska, management people can be salaried.I don't know how far down the chain this runs, but it's not very far. Corporate officers, definitely. Shop foremen, definitely not. You can't call your grunts managers and get out of paying overtime.

      This sort of thing comes up occasionally here: companies try to get out of paying overtime by calling their employees ``salaried'' or ``management''. They lose, and pay fines.

      Here's a free clue: talk to your state labor relations board. They can't give you legal advice, but they can read the law to you, and tell you how to file a complaint. There's a good chance they will investigate your company and shake things up a bit, in your favor.

    7. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most IT workers don't have contracts. So they could fire you, and wouldn't have to pay wrongful termination.

    8. Re:Alternatives by betis70 · · Score: 1

      From what I understand (I am a programming monkey for an HR company, FWIW) yes they can terminate your employment, but depending on the state, this may require building a case against you detailing your poor past performance (at least here in CA).

      But if you walk out, you get no unemployment benefits. If they fire you, you can claim unemployment, but you can forget about using that company as a reference. And if you list it on a resume and HR calls to confirm details of employment, be careful.

      Generally there is an underground HR code that you were fired for incompetance. Under state law they can't say "He was a loser, so we fired him.", but they can do things like the following:

      "I am calling to check on a former employee of yours, Mr. John Smith. Can you describe his work activities at your company?"

      "I can confirm that he worked here."

      "What were his responsibilties? Was he a good employee?"

      "I can confirm that he worked here."

      "How would you rate his performance on the job?"

      "I can confirm that he worked here."

      "I see, thank you very much for your time Mr PHB."

      The message comes through loud and clear.

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
    9. Re:Alternatives by jafac · · Score: 1

      Okay, so, instead of saving up for 6 months of unemployment and quitting, just save up the same amount of money for lawyers first.

      The "wrongful termination" route is just a big joke.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    10. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would any company bother to help another company make sure their prospective employees are good, by giving them accurate reflections of their ability?

  56. Run *when* you can by tgv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But don't go before getting another job.

    Don't bother about people putting moral pressure on you, as I've seen in the postings before. That's quite unreasonable for two reasons.

    First, if the company goes bankrupt, you'll need another job anyway, so the sooner you start looking, the better.

    Second, it's not your responsability, but management's. You cannot be blamed for bringing the company to the point where it is now, so don't feel guilty about the consequences of your actions. Furthermore, somebody else fired you co-workers, and that should make you responsible? No.

    There is another reasons why you might walk: it gives better job security to your current co-workers. The company will need them more than ever and will save a few bucks on your salary.

    Good luck to you and the people in your company.

    1. Re:Run *when* you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Salaried employement is employment at will. A company does not need a reason to "fire" you. They need a reason to lay you off. But anyone can be fired without a stated reason for termination. Realistically though, if your budget got tight and you just hired a carpenter to redo your house, you'd try to strong-arm him into doing as much work for as little money as you can get him to do or you'd realize that you can't afford him and fire him. Why shouldn't the company have the same discretion?
      Are they playing with people's lives to make a profit? Yes. Is it a good thing? A resound "yes".
      Consumers win. That's the nature of capitalism. Lawsuits are only there for unfair treatment of employees. Demanding more from your salaried professional workers in hard times (or simply because you can) is not an unfair treatment.

  57. Don't have a walkout party, have a resume party! by mekkab · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good point TopShelf.

    Combined with other people's comments that "You are replaceable"
    You and your team might as well critique each other's resumes and start applying for jobs.

    If you are walking out, its because you don't want to come back- not because you want them to treat you with respect. If you want to be treated with respect, ASK that you be treated with respect. If the response is a lot of Management BS (hopeful language but nothing concrete) you know that they aren't going to do anything about it. So send those resumes, line up a better jorb (homestar runner typo!) and then LEAVE.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  58. Yes, we just did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A group of us at my company just did this. It has had its problems. I haven't gotten my last paycheck because, just as we all believed, the company couldn't survive without us. The second effect is that I am now emotionally and economically linked to a group of people who, while not the enemy, I am growing sick and tired of seeing every day.

    The biggest regret I have is an accomplishment that I would never put on a resume or mention in a job interview: I put a dying company out of its misery by being part of a staged walkout. I mean who would walk to talk about that at your next job? "If the company is in trouble, I the man to kill it dead."

    My advice: don't do it. The thing you are suppose to do is get your work done and go home at 5:00pm. If they can't handle this then you will be fired which, believe it or not, will make you feel better than walkout in lockstep.

    1. Re:Yes, we just did this by Boomer2 · · Score: 1

      Grow up.

      The company wouldn't have failed if management -- you know...the folks who get all of the money while we get rah-rah speeches -- had done its job.

      I go to work for a day, do a day's work, and get paid for a day. Everything else is optional. Company loyalty is a fairy tale told to children who don't know any better.

  59. Be selfish, but don't be vindictive by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Find another job. Then leave. Convince your colleagues to do the same.

    Solidarity is all well and good, but at the end of the day, the only reason any of you are working for this company is to get a paycheck at the end of the day. You don't actually owe each other anything.

    If the company suffers (as it will after a mass wlakout) it doesn't help you. It harms them, with ne benefit to you at all, and the loss of your financial stability. It doesn't matter if they learn their lesson. If they improve, you don;t work there any more.

    Admittedly, the other people will suffer even more through having to do your job if you walk out, but that will be short term. They can also find a new job. You can help each other out if you want. They can stiull choose to leave.

    1. Re:Be selfish, but don't be vindictive by ronfar · · Score: 1
      Be a mercenary, not a regular soldier.

      Companies want you to be a regular soldier, they want you to have Esprit de Corps, and work out of your love of the company. You shouldn't listen to any of that or buy into it. I'm always surprised that people do. (This is why my current company set up an XBox room in one of the spare offices and occaisionally takes us to a matinee for big movies.)

      I was up front with my manager at my old company when we had a power struggle going on with upper management. A nasty thing involving lawyers, the winners would end up controlling the company for the short time it survived after that. She was trying to sound me out to see whose side I was on. I told her, "I'm a mercenary, I'll work for whoever pays me." I think she appreciated my honesty, because she got me a job at the company where she ended up.

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    2. Re:Be selfish, but don't be vindictive by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "You don't actually owe each other anything."
      interesting view. You relize that attitiude is counter productive to a healthy society?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Be selfish, but don't be vindictive by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I'd offer exactly the opposite advice if he was being too inconsiderate to other people.

      You are quite right. We should help each other out, and work together. There are times when you have to look out for yourself though. When these people are looking for jobs, they are going to be looking at a job for themselves. Close loyalty to colleagues will typically stop when you're no longer colleagues.

    4. Re:Be selfish, but don't be vindictive by keithdowsett · · Score: 1

      I've been there and done that. The company I was working for was taken over by a multi-national. Another key grunt and I were transferred onto the big guys pay scales on unfriendly terms.

      So I found a job which payed better then went and talked to my boss. I told him what the problem was, detailed what I had been offered and gave him my resignation with plenty of notice.

      He was unable or unwilling to match the new offer to I left. Better still my colleague found himself in a very strong bargaining position and got a substantial pay rise.

      Definitely a win-win situation.

    5. Re:Be selfish, but don't be vindictive by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Good advice.

      From what I've seen, being involved in office politics is typically not a good idea. I've never been in a company that does have this sort of culture, but people I know seem to find the daily plotting and backstabbing extremely stressful.

      I think most people are happy as long as people aren't plotting against them.

  60. 100 people say "yeah sure" but only 3 will do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Most people will say they will, but when it actually comes to put words into actions people get all selfish , think about mortgages kids commitments etc and don't do it.

    what you learn about life is everyone is full of shit and you can count on that, not them

  61. walkout by cavedwler · · Score: 1

    I worked for a small ISP a few years ago and the same thing happend. They made everyone start working overtime and then sprang it on thurday (day before payday) that they were not going to be able to make payroll and that everyone would have to take a pay cut. Everyone went to lunch and stayed at the local coffee house for three hours at which point everyone was called and paged to let everyone know that they had "found the money to make payroll".

    --
    "Sex is a very natural and wholsome thing, but only if it isn't done right." Welcome To Paradox
  62. Been there... by TallEmu · · Score: 1

    ... we were a three-person team in a department that was soley responsible for several mission critical systems at a major company.

    Short version.. they stuffed us around with our contract, (not seriously, just a power-play) and after many, many discussions we walked out.
    They called us at the golf course a few hours later, and we were back at work the next day. We worked for them for another few years and all was well. Our company expanded and contracted in synch. with the dot com boom (including the ultimate implosion and death phase sadly).

    Would I walk out in todays economy? Nope. I'll still walk away from bad business, but I won't walk out on a secure contract unless I have another alternative.

  63. Hmm by DreadSpoon · · Score: 1

    You are so reading the wrong website if you want to avoid profanity.

    In the same vein, this is so the wrong website to be asking for "professionalism."

    ~,^

  64. Legal Obstacles by rimberg · · Score: 1

    The biggest obstacle to you walking out and forming a company with your colleges would be the terms of your contract. Every employee contract I have ever seen contains a clause that states you are not allowed to temp other employs to leave and join you at a new job. Mass resignation is legal, its just a problem if you all want to set up a new firm doing what ever it was you where doing before. Normally you need to wait about six months before you could form the company, you could not directly target customers you where introduced to while at your previous company and you would be best advised to seek legal conceal about the best way to do it.
    Also depends a lot on where you are in the world.
    Be aware of the risks of starting a company in your spare time

  65. The employer/employee relationship by defile · · Score: 1

    Too many employer/employee relationships lack trust. It probably can't be helped if you work in a huge company that your direct superior has no interest in you.

    I don't get it. Why would you base your livelihood on people you wouldn't trust to take care of a pet, or your car, or to keep a secret? When you work for strangers, or even people who hate you, you're bound to come into situations where you have 60+ hour work weeks, feel unappreciated, and believe that your only choice is an all-or-nothing walk-out.

    Maybe I'm just being naive, but I hope my employees trust me enough to think I'm giving them a fair deal (and I hope they told me the truth when I hired them under such arrangements), and if they don't like it, I also hope that they'll come talk to me about it.

    I'm not saying that you're being unreasonable, perhaps your employers are genuine assholes. I just can't fathom a relationship getting to such a point. In prior jobs, the second something went wrong and looked as if it was not going to be reconciled, I would quit immediately.

    Good luck.

  66. Can I have you job...since I don't have one? by as400tek · · Score: 1

    Nuff Said. Hey suck it up and get back to work! Stupid!

    --
    David Vasta iSeries(AS/400) Admin & Junkie
    1. Re:Can I have you job...since I don't have one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, the guy isn't stupid, he has principles and self-respect. He's at least considering improving his work environment by doing something drastical.

      Just because you're willing to do anything to get a job, doesn't mean that everyone is willing to crawl on their bellies.

      Why are you unemployed? Do you blame the economy? Off-shore workers? How about yourself? Do you feel you're too good to work in a restaurant while looking for something better?

  67. Chacham? is that you? by mekkab · · Score: 1

    oh shut up chacham! ;)

    (or should I say "please close your mouth, chacham!")

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  68. Better Idea by laigle · · Score: 1

    Given this is on Slashdot I'm guessing we're talking IT departments here. So instead of walking out, take advantage of your position. Use the computers to set up a website that advertises your department staff to other companies. Then, once you've lined up jobs at competitors, you can leave en masse. Don't forget that the best form of revenge before leaving is always to do a mass install of Kazaa on the whole corporate net and fill up the computers with Metallica and Dr Dre rips, then send an anonymous complaint to the RIAA.

  69. They call it a union... by starcraftsicko · · Score: 1

    Look, I dont much care for unions, but if enough of you feel the way you do, you should form/join one. Of course doing so will probably be the last nail in the coffin for your company, but if you do form a union, at least you'll have certain legal rights.

    If you just walk out, the company will just replace you. Sure, they'll be hurtin' in some areas for about a month, but then they'll hire some unemployed slashdotters for peanuts and get back to business. You'll make your point better if the s**t you throw at them is legally protected.

    Whatever you do, make sure you can live with the consequences.

    Notwithstanding the comments above, unions suck. Union dues, misuse of said dues for politics, being TOLD that you have to go on strike... blah!

    1. Re:They call it a union... by Eponymous+GNU+HURD · · Score: 1

      Unionization has worked pretty well for us under the situation described here. As to unions sucking, my experience is that really depends on the union in question. My union - Industrial Workers of the World - is fairly small, so it doesn't have all the resources a large union has for dealing with a large employer, but it is run on a grass-roots democratic basis and has constitutional bars from spending money on political measures. Its dues are also trivially low (the absolute highest rate is $18/month). I've never heard of Wobblies being made to go on strike or otherwise do anything that they didn't decide on at the local level.

  70. Beware of the prisoner's dilemma by the+bluebrain · · Score: 1

    The question is: where does each of you figure going when (or if) you do leave? If each of you already knows, that's fine.
    If it's just a ploy, however, it might backfire.
    But above all: if some people do leave, it will be a boon for the people left behind: they (the department) will have the full attention of the management and "instant VIP status". The best position for you is if you're the only one left over of course: you get to rebuild the department, and more or less dictate the terms :)
    One more thing: people in general (I know I do) tend to over-estimate their worth *in a particular position*. I.e.: you may know the ins and outs of whatever it is you do intimately, and figure everything would crumble if you / your department upped and left ... but what might actually happen is that the management hires some Joes and Janes off the street, who have re-invent many many wheels, but perhaps by doing just that get by just fine. Question: have you accounted for that?
    In the end, walking out is cool (especially if the boss is French like @ JBoss (kidding! kidding!)), but finding a solution is ultimately more satisfying.

    --
    yes, we have no bananas
  71. EBay by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1


    Wasn't there a whole development team, including coders, QA testers, admins and managers for sale on EBay a few years ago? Initial asking price something like everyone's base salary + hiring bonus?

    I always wondered whether that was for real.

    It hasn't happened so much in the recent economic climate, but up to a few years ago, one often heard of about whole teams in investment banks or software companies switching quite readily.

    I suppose it depends on whether you can find someone with budget and a need. Or you can just spin off your own consultancy. My advice, without knowing more specifics, would be to hang around and collect paychecks for as long as you can (do the work, but don't kill yourself) while very actively exploring your options.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  72. Tried by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 1

    There was this one horrible meeting.... Everyone walked out of it thinking, "Okay, that's it, any chance this was going to stay a good place to work is gone." (It was something like a 2 - 3 p.m. meeting. We didn't go back to our desks, we all went to the nearest bar.)

    I knew of a consulting company that wanted to expand into roughly our area, and I tried to put something together. ("You want to be here. I knew a few dozen really good people here. Let's talk.") We had exactly the right technical experience. We completely lacked the domain experience needed for the potential customers being targeted in our area. Oh, well.

    Within two months, thirty percent of us were gone. The first wave moved within the company; the second wave went to a sibling company in the area; the third wave went to startups or created their own consulting companies. People tended to cluster together, a bit, but there was no mass exodus.

    And the scary thing is ... in retrospect, that might have been exactly the intended result of that awful meeting.

    Good luck!

    --
    Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
  73. En Masse? by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    You need to be real careful about this.

    Everyone in the group will contribute their particular grievance until the sum, to a single individual, seems like overwhelming evidence of company management being incompetent, callous, petty, vindictive and just so damned malevolent.

    Well, in reality, they're not that malevolent, anymore than villains in real life are that malevolent.

    The groups helps to build a story. And it is good to share.

    But don't get caught up in the herd mentality, because the mob will rampage for less reason than a thoughtful individual. And, even if the individuals in your department are, by and large, good folk, the conglomeration of your grievances will goad you into doing things you'll regret later.

    Act rationally, calmly, professionally, thoughtfully (of everyone), and deliberately consider your actions, making allowance for the fact that you still do not have (nor will ever have) the complete, uncolored truth.

    If you leave, it should be on professional and agreeable terms.

    Some particularly aggreived and emotional members of your group will want management to "get what's coming to them" by having a valuable department leave en masse, telling them off, and basically burning bridges.

    As a professional, you know better than to burn bridges behind you.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:En Masse? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Everyone in the group will contribute their particular grievance until the sum, to a single individual, seems like overwhelming evidence of company management being incompetent, callous, petty, vindictive and just so damned malevolent. Well, in reality, they're not that malevolent, anymore than villains in real life are that malevolent.

      I quote:

      "You suddenly find yourself working 50-60 hour weeks, put on call with no compensation..."

      Demanding that employees do more work (25%-50% more!) with no compensation is malevolent. There's no "group storytelling" at work there. I've seen the herd mentality take over among admin people where I work, and it usually stems from stories of this sort: "he said, like, 'do this report by tomorrow' and like, he was really mean about it. Bosses here used to be nice." That's where you get problems-- when people confuse their own feelings with employer abuse. People taking the tone of a boss' comment personally when in reality he's just having a bad day? That's storytelling. Having your workload doubled without compensation? That's employer abuse.

      I agree that any departure should be conducted in a businesslike manner with no attempts at "revenge" or such; but neither should people ignore the fact that management abuse is bad enough to make them angry.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  74. Don't walk out... by Pionar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just start claiming company property for "compensation" cuz you'll be at the bottom of the list when bankruptcy time comes.

  75. I've seen it happen more than once... by Ulysses · · Score: 1

    The first time was during the early 90's and everyone who walked out moved right in to a better position almost immediately.

    OTOH, I saw it another group try it again about two years ago... I think some of those guys are still looking for jobs...

    In todays economy something like this is the equivalent of playing russian roulette with 5 bullets in the six-shooter.

    --
    -- If it weren't for the voices in my head, I'd go insane from loneliness. -Me, Myself and I
  76. I hate to be the hammer here... by BubbaTheBarbarian · · Score: 1

    but hear me out.

    Wages are at thier lowest rate in five years. Unemployment is at it's highest since god knows when. It now takes 5 to 8 months to find a job in the current market.

    Oh, by the way, one word for you...India (and if I haveto talk to one more motherfucker that I amslamminghome a 100 bucks an hour for and cannot understand I MIGHT WALK...to India...and hang a cows head overtop the call center door).

    Deflation, plus lower wages, plus outsourceing = shit for you if you do. If you do do it, please respond to slashdot as I am sure alot of us would like to hear about something like this and if it works.

    But my gut says no, and paranoid side says that they juts be TRYING to getyou quite, sell the IP to the highest bidder and float on down in thier golden parachutes.

    WAR PEACE!!!

    1. Re:I hate to be the hammer here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, by the way, one word for you...India (and if I haveto talk to one more motherfucker that I amslamminghome a 100 bucks an hour for and cannot understand I MIGHT WALK...to India...and hang a cows head overtop the call center door).

      You could try that... you wouldn't have to worry about employment (or anything else) ever again.

  77. I don't think so by michaelggreer · · Score: 1

    IMNAL, but I don't think so. Workers are still allowed to act freely and collectively in this country. (Sherman or Stimson anti-trust law, I think)

  78. Organization by polin8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actions similar to what your considering can be an effective means of leveraging respect from employers. However, unless you have the organizational structure in place _before_ hand, what your contemplating will result in you (and some of your coworkers) losing your jobs and the company having a few rocky months.

    The scenario your suggesting is trying to 'collectively bargain' with the company when you only have a 'collective' of one department.

    Call up a CWA (communication workers of America) local in your area, organize your department and as many of the other company employees as you can to join the union. Take 6 months to build the organization and plan a collective action. This way you'll have support in other departments, and union support externally.

  79. Happened to me once by jlower · · Score: 1

    And it sucked.

    I was hired to manage the composition department for a print shop. I didn't know it when I was hired, but the department felt one of their own should have got the job. On my second day, the entire 1st shift (15 typesetters & proofers) staged a walkout. They marched into my boss's office while I was in meeting with him and announced they'd be back the next day and took a hike.

    He (my boss) fired them all, even though I begged him not to. I canabalized the 2nd & 3rd shifts to fill the day shift and hired replacements, but a LOT of talent and experience went out the door and the company suffered for months because of it.

    I would have liked a chance to win them over but didn't get it. In this instance, everyone was wrong and everyone was a loser. I hope I never am in that situation again on either side of the fence.

  80. Hey, what if.... by jkrise · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The entire XP team walked out, saying "This code isn't gonna get good anytime next 10 years?"

    The entire IIS team walked out, saying "We can't touch apache in the next 5 years"

    The entire Hailstorm team walked out "No one's gonna buy this!"

    Sounds like all of the above happened - prolly explains why we get the same old code with new names.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Hey, what if.... by Horny+Smurf · · Score: 1
      What if .... you posted something ontopic instead of bashing MS.

  81. Why walk out? by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    IF youre all together on this, then simply work a fair ammount. If NO ONE will work more than 40 hours uncompensated, what are they going to do? Well, try to fire one of you to set an example comes to mind, but if all of you have you resignations printed up and ready to hand in the moment they do that, you can have some fun with them.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  82. DON'T WALK OUT - STAND UP FOR YOURSELF by jonniesmokes · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you and your co-workers have started a union. So do what unions do. Stick together and bargain collectively. Walking out and calling it quits won't get anyone what they want. But working to "rule" would probably help you and your colleagues a lot. The company cannot fire all of you for doing your job well; but without free overtime and on-call BS.

    I recommend that you and your colleagues keep your job but work as you think your job should be done.
    If they fire you, then you can sue the pants off the company. But if only one employee does it, its not very effective. You've got to stick up for each other.

    I might recommend that you and your coworkers save a few dollars for a rainy day too.

    1. Re:DON'T WALK OUT - STAND UP FOR YOURSELF by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      They can't fire all of them...at once. But there are plenty of people willing to do their jobs, whether they get fired piecemeal or walk out.

      Think about it: if the company gets wind of this, they only have to start firing one person at a time at random intervals. The remaining employees will train the newcomer in the business, and before you know it the whole department will be replaced with people who won't complain for a few years. And the former employees no longer have their only bargaining chip: familiarity with the company systems and projects.

      Was the company treating them bad before this? Maybe they are just feeling the effects of a tough economy. Seems like a pretty harsh thing to do, walk out when a place needs you most. They should be glad that the company is staying true to them, and not replacing them with cheap foreign labor. If the company ever gets back into boom times, I'd look for bonuses all around.

      --
      ...
  83. Did not happen to me, but a system I worked on. by will_die · · Score: 1

    This was/is a huge government system, and will not go into names.
    The new system release was suppose to be released in mid-late 2000, and by late 1999 was on good track to be ready by; then after over 2 years of development. Needless to say it was a major change in the system, atlot of other systems were waiting for it.
    Come January 2000 the office decided that they would move everything to a new location 25 miles away, and instead of being in the far outer subburbs of washington DC, they would now be right in the middle of the some of the busiest traffic area. The whole development team(devs, dbas, sub-project leaders) except for around 4 people, decided not to face the traffic each day and quit or took other jobs.
    So the project leader got stuck with hiring a whole new team while at the same time having to do the move. It took over 6 months to start get enough new people.
    It is now 2003 and they still have not released the new software, they are expecting a release by late this year. Which is great news to all the other software that has been delayed since it was developed to the specificiations of the new software.

  84. Some Considerations to Keep in Mind by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    I read this over and over and read everyone's comments. I went on past experience, and on experiences of people I know. Yet this is still too vague.

    1) Do you and your group plan on starting a new company? Or just all going out in different directions?
    2) If not, you should at least have a job lined up.
    3) What are the REAL motivations? Because you're pissed off or because you want a better work environment? It'll be much easier to interview at your next job (if you're not starting up your own) to say "I left to better my career" than to say "I was pissed so I left"

    I myself quit a job at an unnamed company (7th largest in the world...do your research if you really care) but ended up starting up a company with someone else. I have friends who pretty much took their entire department at a rather large media company and went to form their own.

    Again...what are your intentions, motives, goals, and backup plans?

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  85. Personal Experience by LightningTH · · Score: 1

    I had the same deal happen at a company I use to work for. Our small group walked out as the insane hours and insane amount of stress was starting to have an impact on our health. It was a company that was so nice in the beginning that we were willing to give our spare time to them but the stress started kicking in and people's health started to suffer.

    A close friend was in tremendous amounts of back pain. After taking a 2 week vacation, it went away. The day they walked back in the door and was hit with the stress that had come up from the cut-backs, the pain was back. They were not willing to give their health to the company. Stress is devistating on the body and affects people in different ways.

    Don't stay at a company if the stress that is caused from company actions affect your health physicially or mentally. It just is not worth it. Of course for anyone that has a family, such working hours can put stress on the relationship too.

    Of course, leaving the company may mean not having a job unless you know of a place to go. The industry is healing from the .COM bust but companies are still being careful and the healing is still taking place.

  86. And life goes on... by color+of+static · · Score: 1

    From my experience, you may be the only one, or limited set, that leaves. It may be akward at the company for a little bit, but most bussinesses can survive lossing a service for a short while or having to route around it. The people that remain will get more stressed, and have to do more work.

    For those that leave, you will be able to look for a better job. How successful you are at reaching this goal depends on you and the economy.

    Overall, in most cases this is just an annoying form of bridge burning. Just look for the new job while keeping the old one and leave on good terms. There are people who some companies can not do with out, but that is the companies own fault for relying on "heroic effort" and they deserve to be punished.

  87. Manex = ESC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Gaeta et al did such a move between The Matrix and The Matrix Reloaded. Manex VFX was undergoing legal and financial difficulties (and also there were alleged management disagreements) and allegedly the core VFX team decided to "escape" from Manex, leaving their desks and forming a new company ESC Entertainment *straight across the road from Manex*, taking the Wachowski contracts for Matrix 2 & 3 with them.... Or so I've heard...

  88. Not a strike, a "go-slow" by michaelggreer · · Score: 1

    This would be the classic "go-slow," where everyone drags and holds up production without walking out. The only difficulty is that they can fire you for cause (no unemployment after all), and you give them a little time to find replacements if they are going to be hard-nosed. It is, however, a beautiful thing to watch.

  89. What is your goal? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    What is the point you are driving at? Are you trying to "teach the company a lesson?" If so, how does this help you (other than through catharsis)?

    Are you hoping that they will ask you to reconsider when you all resign? And treat you better? If so, think twice. They'll probably just accept your resignations.

    If you just want to get out of there, I'd suggest just quietly looking for a new job. If you just can't stand it and you can afford to be out of work, just quit.

    -Peter

  90. Office Space by av8tors32 · · Score: 1

    Why not just pull an office space manuever.

    If they treat you like shit then become a turd. Don't work hard, don't finish the unreasonable workload and have a little fun.

    Make them go through the paperwork and hassle of slowly removing you while you find another job.

    Maybe a work stopping flu could hit your particular group. Everyone calls in sick and then have a LAN party.

    Bottom Line: There are ways to let management know your displeasure without quitting. (there are much better ways to hurt management without quitting)

    1. Re:Office Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you don't like you job you don't quit, you just do it really half assed, that's the american way" Homer Simpson (quote might not be quite exact)

  91. Why I would go solo next time by jj_johny · · Score: 1

    The first issue is that there are only a couple of areas that can support the kind of mass walk you are talking about and all are in very specialized consulting. Most poeple have non-competes that they have signed and although they generally aren't valid in court, nobody wants to go through the legal hassle. What I found when talking with various friends at my last work about leaving and starting something up was that they all were financially tapped. They all need about 80% or more of their present income. So they were only serious if the income interuption was brief and small. And the other thing is that there are lots of folks who do their jobs well but really don't understand about being their own boss. Generally, lots of the folks that work in big companies do so because they can't hack it in a small company.

  92. Re:do it! walkout! by tartanblue · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I can see how your fast food analogy applies to programming...

    All kidding aside, I think we have all gone home early once in a while because we needed to blow off a little steam. Quitting != leaving early one day.

    --
    TartanBlue
  93. yeah, I've done this by Triple+Helix · · Score: 5, Informative
    I came from a company that did exactly this sort of thing. I worked for a software shop that created enterprise software on a contract basis. Everybody worked 50 or 60 hours per week, and without fail every Friday afternoon the CEO would come into the office at 4:30 or 5:00 and give everybody some crazy new project due on Monday morning. In addition, he'd make all the developers come into the office on Sunday for a company meeting to discuss the progress of the new assignments. It was a complete mess.

    So anyway, my project manager, two other developers and I got sick of this and decided to start a company of our own. This was back in 1998. We got some funding and made a go at it. Not two days after we quit and started up the new company did we all get slapped with a lawsuit from the previous employer. The lawsuit alleges that we stole trade secrets from the previous employer, which was completely baseless. But, it accomplished the goal of putting a huge burden on us while we were just starting out.

    Fast forward to 2003. We were recently forced into chapter 7 bankruptcy, partly due to the legal fees associated with the lawsuit, but also due to the fact that my previous project manager (who was the president at the new company) was one of the worst businessmen on this planet, despite being a great project manager. The legal system is slower than molasses - we still aren't scheduled to go to trial until July of this year - nearly five years after the lawsuit was first filed! There have been some depositions, hearings, rulings, and appeals along the way, but man has this thing dragged out! Needless to say there's not any money for them to win anyway due to the bankruptcy.

    Overall, walking out and starting a new company was the greatest business decision I ever made in my life. I'm getting all sorts of offers to do contract work on the side, plus one of our customers at the new place hired me with a six-figure wage plus great benefits, and actually allowed me to write a no-compete into the employment contract. In addition, they have picked up an attorney for me and agreed to pay my legal fees in the lawsuit.

    If I could go back, I'd still say that the lean years at the new company were all worth it. My only regret was not doing it sooner - I'm already 24 years old and I'm not going to live forever.

    1. Re:yeah, I've done this by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 1
      at the new place hired me with a six-figure wage


      My only regret was not doing it sooner - I'm already 24 years old
      A whole 24 years old & on six figures? Man, you washed up old-timer....


      (/me weeps bitterly)

    2. Re:yeah, I've done this by pmz · · Score: 1

      ...hired me with a six-figure wage....I'm already 24 years old and I'm not going to live forever.

      Geeez, six-figures...I feel for you, man. And at 24, too. What a pity.

    3. Re:yeah, I've done this by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 1
      Argh!Must. Preview. More. Often



      at the new place hired me with a six-figure wage


      My only regret was not doing it sooner - I'm already 24 years old


      A whole 24 years old & on six figures? Man, you washed up old-timer....

      (/me weeps bitterly)

  94. Wait a minute... by Sounder40 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I didn't hear you say anything about talking to your management. If your immediate supervisor/manager is unresponsive/ineffective, then you have the right to go up the chain until you get heard.

    Most companies want to know when their employees are unhappy. Most companies will do something about thier unhappy employees because they realize that unhappy employees are unproductive.

    You are the company. Be a team player. Don't go into a meeting with a manager/director/SVP/etc. making demands; help solve the problem by proposing a solution. You may have already tried some of this. That doesn't mean that you can't try again. If no one is responsive, then it may be time to move on.

    But beware... The market is not good right now, and new employers will be less than enthusiastic about hiring someone who walked out on their last employer.

    Good luck.

    --
    A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
  95. These are called "yellow-dog contracts" by michaelggreer · · Score: 2, Informative

    These are called "yellow-dog contracts." They used to be illegal, but who knows whats going on these days. Thousands fought to earn these labor rights of ours, which we are letting slide away...

    1. Re:These are called "yellow-dog contracts" by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      These are called "yellow-dog contracts." They used to be illegal, but who knows whats going on these days.

      They were outlawed by the Norris-LaGuardia Act in 1932, and they're still illegal. No employer can force you to stay out of a union.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  96. There is a middle road... by punchdrunk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was in a situation like this a few years ago, only the company wasn't in financial problems at all. We were posting a strong profit and higher-ups were taking nice bonuses. Meanwhile our bonus plan got trashed, we were working 70-80 hour weeks including stat holidays, and getting nothing for it. Also management was accepting contracts with deadlines we could not make without working double-time. After they asked us for the estimates and we gave them the correct amount of work.

    We were in a position where our group of 5 developers were working with custom-built software. There was a ramp-up time of several months to get new people to the point where they could be productive developers. And of course no docs :) So if we left they would have forfeited on some large contracts and they had no hope of bringing in replacements.

    We did the extra work for about 6 months, including getting screwed two quarters in a row on bonuses, before we took action. Instead of all quitting we simply announced that since the company refused to acknowledge our extra efforts on their behalf they would no longer get extra effort. We worked hard for our regular hours but no late nights, no weekend work, no coming in on holidays. Our lives all got a lot better and we still had jobs.

    Of course that was in a market where we all knew that we could walk out the door any morning and have several job offers by the afternoon :)

  97. With IT being as tough as it is by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    to find a job, I suggest making sure you have somewhere to go - if you live in a city, that's a plus - smaller towns talk 'off the record', since there is a network beyond work in place. You can find door shut in your face if they hear about you on the 'grapevine'.

    See what the options you have are - take a good look at something that you've wanted to do, and see if there is an opportunity there. Sometimes, everone needs a change of scenery. Again, ensure that there is *somewhere* to go; you don't want to be the new bitch at McDonalds.

    Be self aware, and honest with yourself - did you have a gravy job;, did you spend hours of company time trying to make the perfect paper clip crossbow? Is this job the best that you can hope for right now?

    It seems to me that you would be better serving yourself (when it comes down to it, you have to pay *your* bills) to sit down and think:

    1) Where am I going to go?
    2) Am I just getting fired up (no pun intended), because of my coworkers?
    3) How do I feel about the coworkers that I will be affecting?
    4) Will this end in a firey gun battle?

    Just be sure you are taking care of you, cause once rent, electricity, water, car payments, food, and cable bills start coming in, you will find yourself in a darkened apartment, with a can of spagetti-o's, wondering when you'll get used to taking cold showers.

    Of course, if your Goth - then go for it!

  98. Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try the same senario, seven days a week. The answer became obvious. I didn't need anyone else to prop my courage up with...I left. I believe in the system and I am prepared. This didn't come on without notice.

  99. I did! I did! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was long ago, but in an economic environment not unlike the one we have now. Several co-workers and I evacuated from a deteriorating company. We all went on to better jobs, fortunately, but went through one to six months of unemployment.

    The critical issue for making this a success is a financial plan to pay the bills while you'll be out of work. If this is a problem, you will have a difficult and stressful time. I cut back on unnecessary expenses, moved in with somebody who also quit, in order to share rent.

    It was tough, but nearly all of us look back at that event as one of our best employment history moments.

    And it was too much fun walking around the company saying good-bye to our friends while management scurried around wondering WTF we were doing!

  100. Been There; Just Done It by bhima · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Recently Iâ(TM)ve been in a similar situation and my opinion is: Donâ(TM)t bother to orchestrate some big event, just help each other to find other jobs. The negativity you bring on yourself isnâ(TM)t worth âoeTeachingâ management (In my experience, if the company is really in this position, management is too arrogant for communication from the working class to be effective). However many people joined together to find jobs seams to be quite effective and a very positive experience. My position currently stems from an interview a co-worker had, where he put the manager in contact with me. Potential employers find this sort of recommendation attractive I suppose. (And my former employer is currently looking about his building with a dazed look wondering what happened to all of us and how is going to deliver what he over sold in the first place)

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  101. entrepreneurial people... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    correlate very well with juvenile delinquents.

    which is why i'm an entrepreneur! having walked out in my youth on poor decision making, and subsequently losing said job, i learned young the idea of planning your departure. plan, work, plan, work, work, work...

    get set up with a small efficient office space and the equipment you need (used office stuff of course). with say 6-12 people this may constitute a few hundred a month in contibutions. this weeds out the cheerleaders. working very long hours is rarely cheerful! comedians come in handy however!

    look for clients... establish the work, and jump one at a time, when doing both jobs becomes intolerable. value the office manager position! have somebody selling continuously not letting this person actually work on the projects other than communicating their value and requirements. of course, if you are indepndently wealthy, ignore all of this.

    drama can be fun, but not when money or death is on the line. quiete determination is where it's at. save your revenge for living well!

  102. WAA WAA..You are lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You suddenly find yourself working 50-60 hour weeks"

    Big deal..go start your own company you will put in more time than that. If you don't like it go work somewhere else. People want everything handed to them. I only work 40hrs, I need benefits, I need a comfertable station, I need my work validated, I need a positive enviroment, I need to feel part of the team, I need kiddie care, I need a shorter commute. Here some free advice, work your ass off, invest, save and think about more than just looking forward to your pathetic happy hour and bbqs on the weekends.

    There a Do'ers and then there are whiny little sheep. Remember..."PUT THAT F&KING COFFEE DOWN, COFFEE IS FOR CLOSERS!"

  103. "Work-to-rule" by michaelggreer · · Score: 1

    Sorry to be the labor historian, but this is called the "work-to-rule," where you follow the rules and contracts to the very letter. It leads to a practical slowdown without creating cause for layoffs. It is a lovely thing, since you get unemployment if they fire you, and less rancor.

  104. No profanity please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Could we please not have stories on the front page containing obscene (e.g. 4-letter) words. There are plenty of sites out there with that sort of language, if people want it, but I've been very happy with Slashdot so far for not stooping to profanity (at least on its front page; comments are a different story).

    It is very unprofessional.

    1. Re:No profanity please by TheShadow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It is very unprofessional.

      Do you actually expect /. to be professional?

      --

      --
      "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
  105. Not a great idea, but.... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    A "work to rule" might work. Just don't do 50-60 hour weeks. Perhaps put in a half hour extra per day, with occasional extra whole hours, to make it quite clear that they're being unreasonable if they fire you.

    Not quite sure what the rules are about employment benefit and unfair dismissal in the US, but I'd have thought that being fired even though working too hard allows you to claim.

  106. Words of wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "If you don't like your job, you don't quit, you just come to work and do it half-ass, thats the American way." -- Homer Simpson

  107. better than walking off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically, management is cutting as much as they can without hurting the company. This means that they have to find a balance -- how hard can you work guys without them walking off the job.

    Your job is to find the right balance, find the least amount of worktime without getting fired.

    My advice is to arrive at work at 9am promptly, and depart at 5pm, promptly. Whatever doesn't get done, can wait until tomorrow. If management can't wait until tomorrow, then they are stuck holding the bag until then. They'll be holding the bag longer if they fire you though!!!

    Acting in unison is important -- its easy to replace one guy (the other guys are there to train the new guy as it is in their best interests). It is NOT easy to have a manager train an entire department from the ground up.

  108. Re:do it! walkout! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So while he was in the walk in freezer, me and two other co-workers just left.
    You should have just locked him in the freezer for a while.
  109. Our whole IT dept quit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and they got labeled "terrorists" and are now stuck in Guantanamo Bay.

  110. Remember These Three Words by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1
    --
    Sigs are bad for your health.
  111. This actually happened by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

    To an ottawa area company called Gastops. If I remember correctly, the entire SW group plus manager resigned en mass, and started their own consulting business. After some brief attempts at negotiation, the lawsuits started to fly. I can't remember how it all ended though.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  112. Welcome to America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    "Also, there have been a couple of lawsuits where people have sued for unpaid over time... a class action suite between Walgreens & their pharmacists(sp) comes to mind. Shoveling a ton of work on you because you're "salary", "a professional", or "management" is illegal, and if you work cannot reasonably be done in ~40 hrs/ week you are supposed to be compensated for overtime put in. "

    I don't know about Walgreens, but Walmart has a long history of pulling crap like that.

    1. Re:Welcome to America! by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about Walgreens, but Walmart has a long history of pulling crap like that.

      Man, don't get me started. I worked there about 10 years ago, and they really did lock the doors and force you to work off the clock.

    2. Re:Welcome to America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're locked into the building, call the police.
      That's false arrest, and a violation of fire codes. (Ignoring labor codes.)

    3. Re:Welcome to America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant 'false imprisonment'... ;)

    4. Re:Welcome to America! by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      They don't even like to hire people full-time in order to avoid paying benefits like insurance, vacation, etc if they can help it. Most employees at the stores are part-time...

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    5. Re:Welcome to America! by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's not false arrest, as they are not arresting you. Holding you against your will in the manner described is kidnapping. If they are refusing to allow you to leave, bring them up on felony charges.

      Does it sound silly and petty? Yup. But so is making you work without getting paid for it.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    6. Re:Welcome to America! by pthisis · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's not false arrest, as they are not arresting you. Holding you against your will in the manner described is kidnapping. If they are refusing to allow you to leave, bring them up on felony charges

      I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice.

      False arrest is unlawful restraint of a person's liberty without legal authority. The details vary from state to state but in most of the US false arrest charges could be applicable. False arrest is generally a civil matter, meaning you can sue yourself.

      Kidnapping is a felony. You can't bring up felony charges yourself, only the DA can bring criminal charges. Moreover, most places kidnapping means more than just restraining the ability to leave; a typical definition is "Kidnapping is forcibly or fraudulently and deceitfully, and without authority, imprisoning, seizing, detaining, or inveigling away any person (other than his minor child), with intent to cause the person to be secreted against his will, or sent out of the State against his will, or sold or held as a slave or for ransom. "

      Federal kidnapping charges require interstate motion or other special circumstances (kidnap of foreign or gov't officials, international kidnap of minors, kidnapping on federal property, etc)

      You'd need to convince the DA that they were holding you as a slave and that it was worth their time and money to bring the charges.

      False imprisonment is also a possible charge. False imprisonment statutes vary but in California it's a civil issue that can also be brought as a criminal matter.

      Again, I am not a lawyer--consult a lawyer for legal advice.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    7. Re:Welcome to America! by suicidal · · Score: 1

      Sorry, not kidnapping either.
      Certain other conditions must also exist.
      But it IS illegal. You are being held against your will, and you can call 911. The police will come, (and probably the evening news as well)....

  113. It's funny.... by garyevesson · · Score: 1

    We wouldn't have even been having this conversation two years ago. The wheel turns....

  114. I Would Keep In Mind... by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Everyone is expendable. It is rare that a walk out hurts a company in the long run, especially if you are not part of a union that at least has some legal leg to prevent the hiring of others.

    There are three certain outcomes. The first is that you will be out of work. The second is that if for some reason the company agrees with your demands, you will be replaced as soon as possible. The third is that you will never get a positive reference from this organization again, possibly hurting your chances for other work.

    You're not too busy if you have time to post on slashdot and spend energy discussing this with your coworkers.

    I would caution you against doing anything as a group. It is unlikely that your needs and motivation completely line up with those of the rest of the group.

    Remember, all jobs stink. That is why we call this "work", after all.

    Ultimately, you need to decide your needs, your career goals, whether you agree with the mission of the organization, and if your position in the organization lines up with what you want to do (or your path to get to what you want to do). If you decide its time to move on, move on. But move on with pride and in a way that respects the feelings of those that want to stay. You want the company to remember you as a good person who would be an asset to any organization, and not a person ranting as they go out the door.

    --
    Sleep is for the Weak
    1. Re:I Would Keep In Mind... by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1

      It is not certain that they would be out of work. You alluded to that in your second 'certainty' which is probably a true one. The third is always true anyway and if your boss and coworkers are also walking out they would give good references for you, no?

  115. Cliff this is your boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please come to my office, right now

  116. Summarizing the Consensus by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    If you're making an Exodus, make sure that when you get to your 'Red Sea', you have both an escape route and a way to CYA from those you're running from.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  117. Gosh I wish you could tell the name... by skogs · · Score: 1

    of the company. Also, it would be beneficial if you all decided on a date to all walk out together.

    I'll be sure to have my resume updated and sent to that company a week or so before you all leave, and then again the day after you leave.

    I'll take a 50 hour a week IT job where they think I am their eternal savior for coming to their aid in the time of trial.

    Maybe it will work out the best for everyone. You could leave and be happy. The management would get a clue, and realize they need your department more than they need air. I would get a better job. You could work elsewhere where you are appreciated, and I could work there and the management would appreciate me because you taught them a lesson of life.

    Everybody is happy.

    Just let me know where and when. send me a message. :) skogs

    --
    Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
  118. Better: by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 1

    Start stealing stuff now!

    Think about it, if the company is forcing you to work and treating you like crap, pick up a few extra items at the office.

    When it goes bankrupt, who better deserves all that stuff? you ? or the creditors?

    They tend to lock everyone out and escort them around when companies go under, so do it early!

    heh-heh

    --
    "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
  119. Write a letter instead!! by CaptScarlet22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's how I got out of a situation like this...

    At the time, I wasn't in the IT deparment at my work, I was working in our Art Deparment, doing IT for ONLY the Macs and outputting printing film.

    Well everyone knew I was way better at computers then the current Systems Admin. So everyone came to me with thier problems, PC or Mac... Since I wasn't getting paid the "IT" salary, I had enough of the abuse and constant interruptions. At the end I had 5 bosses!!!!

    So I wrote a letter telling them how I felt, and how I have no intension of leaving or anything like that, but I wanted to be moved into the It department full time, where I'm must needed. And I didn't discuss any money at this point....

    And you know what, they fired the current Sys Admin, and moved me into the IT deparment full time. And making tones of money......

    It just goes to show you, that you NEED to be tackful, and be very careful and how you handle this.

    I just expressed how I really felt. I told them the truth. If the company and position is worth it, they will understand...

    --
    It's left blank because I have nothing to say to you punks!
  120. Partly your fault by smileyy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You suddenly find yourself working 50-60 hour weeks, put on call with no compensation, given unreasonable amounts of work ...
    So why did you let that happen to you? Why didn't you say "no"? I'm curious...how old are you? I used to feel the same way about a particular job. Then I got older and realized it was just a job, and if I didn't like it, I should find a new one.
    --
    pooptruck
    1. Re:Partly your fault by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 1

      Then I got older and realized it was just a job, and if I didn't like it, I should find a new one.

      I too am older and Know Better (tm) than just going along with whatever management tells me, however, I do sympathize with the fact that IT jobs, and in particular good IT jobs, are very hard to come by. After slaving away for 4.5 years in a shitty position I've finally found a great company to work for.

      Please realize that IT workers with families and/or great responsibilities just can't up and quit because they don't like where they are or see a trend. You have to plan and hope to land a new job before the old crew finds out.

      Things are always simple to the single people. People with families know all too well the grey area of black and white problems.

  121. What if it DID work...for a while? by ScottGant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You also have to take into consideration that if this plan did work and they decide that they couldn't live without you now, that doesn't mean 6 months down the road they replace you with new people.

    If this plan did work it would also make you all look like trouble-makers. They would please you now, to keep the business going, but then slowly hire new people (at a cheaper rate) to learn everything you do and simply replace you.

    So perhaps you should rethink your plan. Remember, no one is untouchable. No one is unreplaceable. You may think this, but it's simply not true.

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    1. Re:What if it DID work...for a while? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, but now you know THEIR true colors.

      The company is not the only one who could spend the next 6 months "making preparations".

      No company is irreplaceable, either.

    2. Re:What if it DID work...for a while? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      This all sounds nice in theory. However, it quite often doesn't work out that way. I've been in companies that tried this sort of thing only to have it backfire dramatically.

      Management has to replace you with someone of equal quality. If they are penny pinching, your replacement will likely be a schmuck. Even if they aren't penny pinching, they just may end up with bad luck.

      Of course Management would never admit this.

      Management also has to be sure to preserve all the knowledge present in the group. In a marginally well run shop, this may be a serious problem. Documentation may not be up to snuff and key information may be trapped in the head of that troublemaker that the CIO just sacked.

      Of course Management would never admit this either.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:What if it DID work...for a while? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh. My immediate boss, the head of the whole tech division, would be the first to walk.

      Hard to get branded a troublemaker when your primary job reference walks out the door right in front of you.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:What if it DID work...for a while? by Madcelt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If your irreplaceable you'll never get a promotion.

      --

      I can only make one person a day happy. Today isn't your day.....tomorrow doesn't look good either!
    5. Re:What if it DID work...for a while? by lpret · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then start looking for a job right now. If you know the company's going down the crapper, and if you can stave off having to quit, I'd go for it, and start looking around for other places.

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    6. Re:What if it DID work...for a while? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry: noone is irreplaceable.

  122. Apart from the feel-good, what does this get you? by darylb · · Score: 1

    The JBoss/Core Developers situation seems unusual in that it's an open source project. What about all those big projects managed by PHBs that AREN'T open source?

    You and your coworkers get hacked off, leave, and then what? You can continue working with them, sure, but what are the odds you'd have a common project to develop? You can't very well take the code you worked on for The Man with you, since, according to U.S. law at least (unsure of others), "works for hire" means the hireR owns it, not the hireE. If you DID take it with you, be sure you can spell lawsuit, since you might be facing one.

    So, you leave with your coworkers (who are perhaps your friends) and your big ideas. In 1999, you could find a big bucks Venture Capitalist looking for a way to quickly lose a few million. In 2003, probably not. Now what?

    That warm, fuzzy feeling you got giving the news to the boss gets cold and prickly fast.

  123. It's the pattern that counts by grimner · · Score: 1

    You say your company is facing hard economic times and therefore is demanding more from its employees. In addition to the many "be thankful you have a job" posts I would like to add in tough economic times it may be important (necessary) for employees to step up and take more responsibility to carry the company through the downturn. If the downturn has no end in sight or if the company continues to treat you like crap even in good times then I think your walkout is justified. Consider the possibility that the company has no alternative if it is to stay in business. Also consider what caused the downturn, a victim of a recession or bad management?

  124. And at your next job interview... by kahei · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "So why did you leave your last company?"

    "They were treating me badly so I just walked out."

    "How were they treating you?"

    "They wanted more work hours and more time on call, because the company was going through some tough times."

    "That was unacceptable to you? You weren't able to negotiate a better position?"

    "Huh? We didn't do any negotiation, we just got together and all walked out."

    "It must have been challenging to manage the changeover to a new team."

    "Nah, we just all walked out together! Maximum disruption!"

    "I see. Well, thank you for your time."

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:And at your next job interview... by Chewie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "So, why did you leave your last company?"

      "They were treating me badly enough that I had to weigh what was more important: My self-respect or a paycheck. I came to the conclusion that I had to leave."

      "How were they treating you?"

      "They started by asking for more work hours and some time on call, because the company was going through some tough times. However, it grew to about eighty hours a week just in the office, plus 24-hour call with no compensation, appreciation, or acknowledgement of our effort. It also became clear that even if the company started doing better, they would view it as more economical to keep up the workload."

      "That was unacceptable to you? You weren't able to negotiate a better position?"

      "No, there was no room for negotiation. To provide service to the customers, we did it. It had to be done, customers were depending on it, and we collectively stepped up to the plate for the good of the company."

      You see? Spin. It works for presidents, it can work for you. If there's one thing I hate, it's interviewers who think it's their job to rake you over the coals before you can join their golden circle of employment. Just because it's an employer's market doesn't mean you have to act like an ass.

      --
      49 20 68 61 76 65 20 74 6F 6F 20 6D 75 63 68 20 66 72 65 65 20 74 69 6D 65 2E
    2. Re:And at your next job interview... by kahei · · Score: 1

      So, let's see...

      "Why did you suddenly walk out en masse?"

      "It had to be done, customers were depending on it, and we collectively stepped up to the plate for the good of the company."

      A very interesting ploy, Mr. Chewie... or, if I may use your real name... TONY BLAIR!

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    3. Re:And at your next job interview... by Chewie · · Score: 1

      Sorry, left a pronoun without a clear antecedent. (God, why am I a grammar nerd?) That should read:

      "That was unacceptable to you? You weren't able to negotiate a better position?"

      "No, there was no room for negotiation. To provide service to the customers, we accepted the extra work. It had to be done, customers were depending on it, and we collectively stepped up to the plate for the good of the company."

      --
      49 20 68 61 76 65 20 74 6F 6F 20 6D 75 63 68 20 66 72 65 65 20 74 69 6D 65 2E
    4. Re:And at your next job interview... by kahei · · Score: 1


      I think the elements of good spin here would be:

      1 -- emphasise not the fact that you quit, but how long you persevered before quitting

      2 -- emphasise that you quit because you were unable to deliver excellence, unable to sasfy customers, etc, rather than that you quit because you were pissed off

      The original poster, though, sure came off sounding like the opposite of this.

      Also, you are a grammar nerd because IT IS YOUR CALLING! Now go forth and CLEANSE the world of those who would defile it! Those who write non-restrictive clauses that begin with 'that'! Those who say 'different to'! Those who say 'irregardless'!

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    5. Re:And at your next job interview... by tigga · · Score: 1
      No, there was no room for negotiation.

      There is always room for negotiation...
      You have at least make a try. Well, if negotiation is failed then you are freee to go.

    6. Re:And at your next job interview... by Chewie · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess technically that's true. I've had work situations come up where I tried to negotiate. Usually went something like this:

      "Hey, you're responsible for activity X now."

      "But..."

      "Do it."

      So, technically, there was room for one word of negotiation.

      --
      49 20 68 61 76 65 20 74 6F 6F 20 6D 75 63 68 20 66 72 65 65 20 74 69 6D 65 2E
  125. This actually can work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a lot of negative comments, but I'd just like to throw in my .02.

    Good people are hard to find, I don't care what economy you're in.

    My friend's co is going through this right now. The Pointy Haired Boss thought he'd be slick and shut down their office and move it across the country.
    Unfortunately, he/she did not realize that they still had to deliver on products to customers, and that only a core group of people could actually do it in the timeframes.

    The team caught wind of this in advance, and basically when the Pres. told them the news and offered them a pittance, they had their own list of demands and were ready to walk.

    Pres., faced with not delivering to clients/ cancelling delivery, and forcing refunds, and more importantly, ruining the company's image so badly they would have to exit the market (where reputation is everything), crapped his shorts.

    Many conversations with lawyers and individuals to see it they could break the alliance. All to no avail - they had him/her over a barrel, because he/she didn't understand the operations.

    About 75% of the people were ready to go, and could go get another job. 25% really were in a bind, and needed the job. But they stuck together, and did all right.

    End result - they got their demands, delivered the product, got a decent package, and moved on.

    (Also I've seen this backfire as well, but usually because the arrogance of 2-3 people who think they are untouchable, but found out the hard way the sun is still the center of the universe.

  126. In the same boat, but not rowwing to the same beat by Patchw0rk+F0g · · Score: 1

    Okay, different industry (advertising) but I recognize your problems. I too, however, echo the sentiment: walking out without a means of support is bungie-jumping over a bare parking lot. Sure, maybe you'll land something soon... or maybe that cat down the block will start looking mighty tasty instead of the food-bank maccaroni you scored three weeks ago. Try to remember that anything can be tolerated... your decision is which you prefer: long hours and the occasional steak while you look for something else, or Fluffy fondue with roast grass. Your choice. I know what mine has been.

    --
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. ~~ Hunter S. Thompson
  127. Homer says: by yAm · · Score: 1

    Lisa, if you don't like your job, you don't strike: you just go in every day and do it really half assed. That's the American way.

    personal.inet.fi/taide/karjalainen/homer.html

    --

    Chris

    So Buddha walks into a pizza parlor and says: "Hey, make me one with everything."

  128. No Unemp Comp; No Backup; No Way to Stick Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen this happen twice -- in one case, my friend did something constructive; he put together the best people, the best product, and shopped themselves to another company. Took it to the boss as a fait-accompli. In the end HAL sold them, everyone was happy.

    In other case, there were meetings, "I will go talk to CEO, just let go of me..." kind of talk. When day came, and the D-day meeting was being held, people drifted in one by one to designated person's office (the leader, who actually was not the main complainer, but felt he had to stick up for his team), with "you know, when I put it all together, my complaints look silly, it will detract from the message " etc etc. He went alone to the CEO's office and got creamed.

    So, warning:
    - If you quit, no unemployment
    - If you are part of a group, no references, plus others WILL hear you led a mutiny --> no prospects
    - If you are part of a group, you will not be taken in as a group by another employer (read that fine print about hiring co-workers or raiding the co)
    - New employer will think twice about hiring you in your area of competency (non-competes are seldom enforced, but if you p.o. people, count on some HR manager spending 5 mins to pay you back for the 5 weeks of pain you caused him)
    - If anyone drops out (and the big mouths will), you will be left holding the bag, and made a scapegoat by the ones who left (he/she fomented the problem, so much better since they left)

    IF YOU WOULD NOT MAKE THE DECISION WITHOUT YOUR FRIENDS AND UNEMOTIONALLY REACH THE DECISION TO QUIT IN ANY STATE OF THE ECONOMY, DON'T QUIT IN A LEMMING SUICIDE. YOUR FRIENDS ARE NOT THERE WHEN YOU HAVE TO PAY THE BILLS OR WHEN YOU GET HOME AT NIGHT (I HOPE).

  129. Don't Be George W. by joebok · · Score: 1

    Try talking first. You said:
    You like your job, it provides great satisfaction.

    That is worth making an effort to preserve. If there is a manager or boss you can talk to openly about your issues then try that first. If there is no such person, then I would question it being a good place to work. Certainly a walk-out would have no other effect than to land you among the unemployed.

  130. Here's what happened to us... by johannesg · · Score: 5, Interesting
    We were a department of five, providing vital services for a company of about 40, which in turn was providing services to a much larger company. The (smaller) company was fucking us over in all directions, and finally enough was enough.

    It is important to realize that we were effectively irreplacable (unique job-specific skills, nothing to do with computers). Or so we thought...

    Three of us (not including myself) went ahead and set up a company, and offered our services to the larger company directly. The smaller company then started on a campaign of threats, allegations, lies, and FUD that would make Microsoft blush. The larger company used us as a lever for negotiating a better contract with the smaller company, then unceremoniously dumped us.

    So would I do it again? Hell, yes. In fact I would do it sooner, and with less restraint. This is important to realize: if we had realized what was coming we would have been less galant towards our former boss (not keeping the systems going while we were setting up our new company, for example - the price would have been high, but it would also have put tremendous pressure on our boss). And we wouldn't have believed the (verbal) assurances the larger company gave us regarding our soon-to-be contract with them.

    The story is far more complicated than this little message (I could write a book about that period), but the general idea I think is clear: we were in a bad situation, we fought, we lost, and we have no regrets.

    Some lessons you may want to remember:

    - Your former colleagues may suddenly turn into your worst enemies. They'll lie to you. They'll try to make you fail in all ways that count. And they may pretend they are still your friend while they are at it.

    - Individual members of your group may be bribed by your former boss to come back into the fold, thereby bringing back all that irreplacable knowledge.

    Are you ready to fight? Can you afford to lose? If so, go for it.

    1. Re:Here's what happened to us... by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Mod the parent up! We need more people like you who take actions instead of whining all day.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    2. Re:Here's what happened to us... by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Essentially: Trust no one.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    3. Re:Here's what happened to us... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      No. You have to build relationships.

      Trust everyone with only what you can afford to lose.

      There are somethings you can risk to build relationships.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:Here's what happened to us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fight!

      This sounds like exactly what happened to me. You wouldn't happen to be in the NorthWest US?

      We were dealing with a company that changed procedures every week, lied, then lied some more. They were very good at deception, spin, threats and allegations. Hiring salesman that didn't sell anything and making everyone a manager. We kept quite and professional. (We were a group of about 8). We told our people that they could quit, but we were outof there. Told them that they could re-sign with other company and no hard feelings. (If we quit we wouldn't be able to support 8 people, only at the max 2 or 3.) Most people quit and wouldn't work for the bozos.

      However, they only knew tactics and had no strategy. We win in the long run. We are back with the Big Company and they are out. They also had to sell off whole departments to other companies to stay afloat this long.... The only other people left after our mass exodus are leaving as fast as they can land jobs, including non-computer people. It has been a year now and the only reason they are still afloat is because of using the money they owed us and selling off portions of the company.

      Maybe we should get together and write a book?

    5. Re:Here's what happened to us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy shit! stealing your (ex-)employer's business! that's #1 on the list of stuff you just don't do! so, you got fucked over while trying to fuck them over.

      ahahaha

      thanks, asshole... that's so funny I just spit out the water I was drinking while reading your dumbshit post.

      funny stuff!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

  131. Reality by ronfar · · Score: 5, Interesting
    No matter how much you might want to be the perfect doormat, crawl and grovel before your boss, and degrade yourself for the good of the company, there comes a point where you have to leave. At my last company, I admit it wasn't until upper management said, "Well, how would you guys feel about working for stock."

    At my current job, when I got fed up, I went to my boss, and said "Look, this is not what I got into this business to do. Either find me some work like you promised me when I signed on, or, with no malice between us, I will seek employment elsewhere." Note, this was at one of the scariest times in the current depression, companies were imploding everywhere you looked, where as the company I am at is a stable, established business that isn't going away for a long time. The safe route would have been, "please sir, may I have another."

    I ended up with a job that was more like what I wanted to do, and I got a big increase in salary. It was scary, though, I had made up my mind to leave if I didn't get what I wanted. Things are far from perfect now. (I'm still trapped in a big bureacracy and bored out of my mind most of the time.) However, I can tolerate the situation now where I couldn't before.

    So, basically, I think everyone has a breaking point. Everyone has a point where they say, "I've had all I can stands, I can't stands no more," even in a truly frightening economy like this one. Of course, it is easy to end up in a situation where you regret your actions, but I haven't yet.

    Or maybe I should have kept my old job, working for stock. I'm sure I'd be a rich man today (snicker.).

    --
    All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    1. Re:Reality by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

      At my last company, I admit it wasn't until upper management said, "Well, how would you guys feel about working for stock."

      Same thing happened to me. So I said "Screw you, Mr. Gates. This company is never going to be succesful. Microsoft will be a forgotten name with worthless stock in a year."

    2. Re:Reality by oldCoder · · Score: 1
      I really did leave Microsoft in the 1980's shortly before the stock options were issued. I figured that IBM had more software engineers than Microsoft had employees, and IBM would never be dumb enough to give the DOS market to pipsqueak Microsoft.

      I kid you not.

      --

      I18N == Intergalacticization
  132. Diplomacy! by w3weasel · · Score: 1

    Use your head first, voice second, and balls third. This is your workplace not the playground, and you are facing off with your source of income, not the neighborhood bully.
    First be sure that you have discussed the situation with your boss. Be sure to include statements like you included in the article (the positive ones only!!!) and more, like "love working here", "feel that I am making an important contribution" blah, blah, blah.
    After (and only after) affirming your positive attitude towards the company should you breach the problem. In this case, simply inform that the demands of your current workload exceed the available manpower in the department, and while you are willing to do everything you can, you are not superman.
    Finally there is the business-meeting trump card. Repeat after me "This situation is causing a serious negative impact on my FAMILY".
    This is a key phrase in negotiations, because it shows you are not being selfish and self-serving, and that you have problems that even your boss can relate to.
    If this meeting fails to produce results, go to your bosses boss, and on up the line. Remember, walking out will result 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of the time with you in the unemployment line (except you cant collect if you quit). FAR FAR FAR better to push the issue to its very limit and get fired first. (getting fired for an acceptable reason as stated in your question is always going to look better than someone who 'gives up on the company' to a new potenetial employer).
    Finally, remember that loads and loads of money can make most work situations bearable... if you can get a substantial (30-50%) raise out of it, you will find that the work is pretty bearable. And dont let anyone convince you that because they are laying ppl off, there is no money for raises, the layoffs are freeing up money that could just as easily go to you as it can toward the CEO's beach house.
    Good luck and good job hunting!!!!

    --

    Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

  133. same here man by pdid408 · · Score: 1

    dude! we have the same exact thing up in here. They kept us through the hard times when they were hardly making any money. Treated us like shit and now when things are getting better, they still keep treating us like shit. Our department is pretty important, so loosing us will be hard for them. We're thinking of quiting one after each other. One already quited and they're in panic. Wait till few more leave.hahaha

  134. Only do it if THIS IS THE CASE by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    You and a few close co-workers at the "Burger Hut" make up the core grunts of 'the Fry Area'. The "Burger Hut" relies heavily on your department for many services, some of which, such as flipping burgers and boiling things in oil, Sally the waitress and Tim the busboy, cannot provide. You like your job, it provides great satisfaction, especally when someone says, "This Beef Stroganoff is pretty good.".

    Suddenly, Bob the Boss realizes he spent way too much at the track and he's in deep financial shit, and starts making cut backs. This impacts the 'the Fry Area' as you have to resue the oil AGAIN. You suddenly find yourself working 50-60 hour weeks, put on call with no compensation, given unreasonable amounts of work, (you have to wash dishes now too?!) and generally treated like the dirt under your code-violating nails.

    You get the feeling that the company is just going to take advantage of you no matter how and what happens. You get together with the rest of the 'the Fry Area' for some beers (ok, a little weed too) and a 'Screw the "Burger Hut"' meeting and decide to give Bob the finger and walk out.

  135. -1, Whining by sczimme · · Score: 1


    Unprofessional??!? New around here, eh? Read the other articles: destruction of CDs, LAN party tips, and slavering gossip over SCO's probable/alleged intellectual property shenanigans... I can see how you got an IBM-esque impression of /.

    Besides, you are just as likely to have naughty words leap out at you from a +5 post responding to an article. What on earth will you do then??

    (Insert "won't someone think of the children?" comment here.)

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:-1, Whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, won't someone fucking think of the goddamn children! Stupid fucking motherfuckers...

  136. Why? by ilctoh · · Score: 1

    Why are you asking Slashdot. Is this "News for Nerds" or "Stuff that Matters". Wouldn't a job counselor be a better bet?

    --
    How many slashes would a slashdot dot, if a slashdot could dot slashes?
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Job counselors don't have as much experience to bring to the table as Slashdot readers do. When was the last time a job counselor wanted to do a mass exodus?

  137. What to consider by MSUWalt · · Score: 1

    First of all, making your grievances known is the first step. Maybe they'll change their ways or show this is definitely short term. However, if their response is, "shut up and type, baby", then they deserve everything they get. Some things to consider before making ultimatums:
    (1) Do you have a skill that is hard to fill in your market (i.e. obscure programming language)?
    (2) Is there even another place for you to go (i.e. obscure programming language)?
    (3) If you're saying EVERYBODY is on board, then make sure of that before approaching management. Management only has to get to one weak-willed, ambitious, backstabbing weasel to break your alliance. If there's ONE guy on your team that can do you all in, I suggest planting something on his computer and ratting him out.
    (4) How long would it take for management to train your replacement, and how much would that cost them? Do they have in huge projects/clients in the works? If you're working on pre-existing software, it can take quite a wall to learn all the back alleys and be productive. If you and your teammates are horrible documenters (and coders), so much the better for you on this point.

  138. Reminds me of a story I once heard... by Paul+Doom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This may be an arcane reference, but I think this idea was tried already a long time ago. As the story goes, workers once banded together to force employers to improve working conditions, pay, etc. As the story goes, these groups called themselves "unions".

    Of course, in the tech industry, where we are all "professionals" and get "salaries" and have "careers", we are above such plebeian things as unions, a day's wage for a day's work, any sort of job security, or any action that would bring into question our undying and unflinching support of whatever corporate entity we are employed by.

    Stand up! Companies treat employees as badly as the employees put up with. One bit of advise: don't just walk out without warning. Get together as a group and talk with management. Be up front about the problems and what would fix them. Don't threaten to walk out, just use your collective voice to give them a chance to fix things. Then if things don't improve, walk. I say this because I once worked for a small company with a CEO that was a real piece of work. All 15 or so employees got together and met with the board, not threatening to walk, but deadly serious. A month or so later, he was gone. If one or two managers are the real problem, organize and go above them. Don't be petty or complain about "style" or "personality". Instead, provide a clear list of issues and how they hurt productivity and morale, and what can be done to fix them. If it works, you won't have to walk. If it doesn't, walk quickly. You will have given them the chance to save themselves a heap of expense and trouble.

    Please excuse the ranting, but as someone with a family and a life, I have been disgusted by all the corporate boot-licking and cowardice I have seen. Big salaries and perks during the boom distracted people from seeing that they we being used. If you work 80 hour weeks, you are doing the work of two for the price of one. Who is the sucker?

    --
    "Life is life." --Laibach
  139. Burning bridges? by dcm1101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Reminds me of the story (urban legend?) that goes around about the engineers who take key systems down for "routine maintenance" just before walking out - to make sure the managers can't run the shop. Of course, this won't exactly help you get a new job.

    Actually, this raises a serious point, which is that a departmental walkout may give you visceral satisfaction, but most technical industries have a 'grapevine' of some sort. You could find yourself interviewing for a new job and having the interviewer say: "Oh, you're one of THOSE guys..."

    Unless you have another job lined up, or know that there are lots of better places with openings, it's probably a good idea to stick with the devil you do know.

    My $.02

  140. Does the Managment know how the dept feels? by Smitty825 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know you shortened the story you printed above, but does the managment know how everyone in the dept feels? (It's obvious that nobody wants increased hours without more pay, but do they realize how upset everyone really is over this?)

    If you did really enjoy your job beforehand, I would create a list (along with the rest of the dept) of the main issues that need to be resolved to make the situation better. Once you do that, explain in a rational manner why these changes need to be made (ie: I understand that money is tight around here, but our dept will not work the extra hours for free. We are vital to the success of this company, etc). Do *not* make any threats (ie: we will all quit). Give the management a chance to change things for the positive!

    If that still doesn't work, then it likely would be best to quit. Alot of people will recommend that you stay until you find a new job, but life is too short to be in a position you hate, while working your life away! If you can afford it, get out!

    --

    Doh!
  141. Quit by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    If the company is making drastic cutbacks on staff and/or pushing up the workload to a level which just can't be done without dangering your health, by either having to work though nights, not able to take sufficiant rest breaks etc, then quit.

    Company will run itself into the ground if it carries on pushing it's workers to hard, it's ok at first someone cuts one or two corners here and there, soon everyones cutting corners and things start to fall apart.

    Quit, and it'll make the companies death quicker and less painful, never know might be able to get every other department to buggeroff as well :)

  142. Been there by lovebyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The company I used to work for was really fucked up. Managed like rubbish by a trio of morons. Full of promises and never delivering.

    All of us researchers and technicians were ok, nice to work with, producing very good stuff and feeling utterly exploited. One day the trio of morons that tried to manage the company sacked the only sane person in the company outside of the techs. There was a general walk out of all the employed techies, one by one in the space of 1 month.

    Nobody got unemployment benefits (this is in Europe). 1 year later, some people still do odd jobs to survive. The fucked up company has just 3 employees: the trio of morons!

    The moral of the story is:
    You need to have the proper qualifications.

    I could just go to management and say "fuck you". I knew I could start another job one week later. Very comfortable.

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

  143. I once knew.. by HoofArted · · Score: 1, Interesting
    a group of guys who were senior IT officials at a major bank who had an FU meeting and decieded to walk. The first thing they evaluated was the amount of knowledge they had between them and how much it would cost the bank to replace that infromation. The second thing they did was form a company and contract themselves back to the bank at 3 times the rate they were being paid. I guess that if you do carry an amount of information and experience with a particular system, proprietory at least, you have a much better chance of doing this same thing. I have an issue with companies that want people to take 10% pay cuts to "keep the company alive". You will never see your 10% ever again and if you do, you will never get an "Alive and Kicking" increase of 10%. The fat cats at the top get those. If you are ever told that it is make or break on the 10%, tell them to go to hell, and employ someone else. By the time they have searched, interviewed and paid the agents commission, they will be more than 10% out of pocket so it will never happen.

    Karma : Bad ??? What the hell ?

    1. Re:I once knew.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me and my co-workers fell for that one, and now that the press releases have gone out stating just how great and "profitable" the company is... we still collectively have not seen anything more added back to our meager salary.

      I wonder if this is one of the "real life practical" lesseons that they teach in MBA courses?

  144. Been there, did that -- twice by casmithva · · Score: 1
    I've been in this situation twice. The first time, within six months of our group departing, the division in which we worked saw their revenues tank -- because, after all, our project brought in more money than all other projects within that division combined. Shortly thereafter, the head of the division was sacked, the remaining employees transferred, and the division dissolved. Our departure was en masse -- a dozen or so resignations, all effective on the same day. The second exodus was less dramatic, both in the resulting vacuum and in the results to the company. The company was on guard for poaching, so our departures were spread out. They were able to adjust to our absence and kept on going, although the folks who took over our work ended up working obscene hours and probably contemplated hunting us down like rabid dogs.

    My advice to anyone in this situation, regardless of how the economy's doing, is to not quit your current job unless you have a one year's cash reserve, a winning lottery ticket in hand, or another job secured. Otherwise, you might find yourself in a real world of hurt very quickly.

  145. I've heard that kind of talk before by asmussen · · Score: 1

    I've worked at more than one place that ticked off their workers enough to start this kind of talk. When the company is taking advantage of you and not giving anything back, it's a really easy idea to mull over. In my experience though, it will never go beyond the talk stage. Most people are not in a financial position where they can afford to just quit their job without another job already lined up. It may be that most of the people you work with may be mad enough to quit, but when it comes right down to it, they will probably decide that they cannot leave themselves in a sitution where they don't know how they are going to support themselves. Therefore, they will look for other jobs, but not quit until they find those jobs. Since it isn't likely that they'll all find alternative employment at the same time, when mass exoduses do occur, it is usually a lot of people quitting over a span of time, and not all at once. While not as dramatic by half, this is far more practical of a decision for the workers involved.

    --
    Shawn Asmussen
  146. Just do what you feel is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this tough economy, you very well might end up unemployed for an extented period of time. If you have enough of a nest egg to deal with that, just do as you and your co-workers feel is right. Even though jobs are far and few between, it's no reason to let yourselves be treated like dirt. Believe in yourself and know that even though there are many other people looking for jobs, you have made it this far once, and you can do it again. Life is too short, try to enjoy it! =)

  147. Self-defeating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to leave, leave now, before your co-workers. There's no sense bailing as a group 'cause you'll just have that much more competition for you next job.

    Not to mention, leaving a job before you have a new one lined up is just plain nuts.

  148. Before You Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please post the company name and contact information so that I can be available to replace you.

  149. Here´s what I did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, first of all, make sure you have another job lined up.
    I had a boss from hell who believed that I should get called at 2-3am nightly with no extra compensation, yet was expected to be in the office at 7am. I started calling in sick... on important days (you know the kind, when thereÂs big meeting with the CIO, special training day that costs the company money, etc). When you get called into HR to explain all your recent absences, tell them that it s because you are expected to survive on 4 hours sleep a night, then come in and perform a full days work. Tell them youÂll try harder, but donÂt. Oh, and donÂt forget to to tell them that itÂs your boss that canÂt seem to find anyone else to even rotate nightly coverage. Do this enough that theyÂll eventually cut off your access to a critical system yet continue to call you at night (by now your boss considers you a threat to the company because of your bad attitude). Simply say ÂSorry, no can do... I donÂt have access and tell them to call your boss. Make sure to call in sick the next day - you were after all woken up for no reason again. When you call in sick, do it at an ungodly early hour, so you get your bosses voicemail. That will force your boss to call you back sometime during the day. When they finally call, ask them why you donÂt have access to the machine you needed to fix the previous night. Chances are, theyÂre not going to tell you on the phone - theyÂll want to discuss it with you in person. This is when you call HR and tell them that your boss has prevented you from doing your job by restricting your access, and that you will not be returning to work until you have the proper access to do your job. Wait for your boss to start covering their ass by saying something totally stupid like ÂI didnÂt know what else to do! - I tried to talk to him!Â. Then ask HR to provide you with documetation that your boss tried to do anything before cutting off your access.
    If they canÂt (which they couldnÂt in my case) walk off the job - and let them know that you WILL be collecting unemployment. When your boss goes ÂPfft!Â, just say ÂYeah, I have the screen prints with the access denied messages, along with the time stampsÂ.
    Walk out and donÂt look back.
    Take a couple of weeks before you start your new job.
    After a full two months of still being called by your former employerÂs users asking for help (in the middle of the night, no less) call the HR dept of your former employer and tell them that if they do not stop calling you asking for your assistence, you have no choice bu to haul them into court and ask for some sort of compensation for your nightly calls, which now are interferring with your new job.
    Receive a small sum of hush money for your troubles.
    Watch former boss get canned.
    Heh
    Heh
    Heh.
    (True story, BTW - dot coms... gotta love Âem for not knowing how to run a business)

  150. Communicate, people! Communicate! by jtheory · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Neither of these is a good answer at this time!!

    Maybe the description of the situation left some things out... but this really seems like a big case of an "us against them" failure of communication. Notice this bit: "You get the feeling that the company is just going to take advantage of you no matter how and what happens." Feelings, huh? You don't know what's going on or why, but you have these feelings?

    There is no "company", a single malevolent entity that is treating you like dirt. There are a lot of individuals involved in the decisions to ask more hours of you, put you on call w/o extra compensation, etc.. Right now, one of your managers is probably talking to his superior, saying "well, I guess we could ask W and X to handle those few extra on-call hours... it sure sucks, but they seem to be okay with the increases so far, and someone has to do it. That should keep customers Y and Z with us, so we'll be okay on payroll through this quarter, at least."

    Do you get it? You have to ASSUME that everyone is on your side from the very beginning, and start talking to your manager, their manager, etc.. Let them know that you and the other grunts are starting to give under the strain. Find out what the problems of the company are, and talk about how the company is dealing with them.

    Important: approach everything with a friendly, "we're all doing what we can" attitude. As soon as you get hostile, whoever you're talking to will get an uncontrollable urge to dig in their heels. Instead, decide where your breaking point would be, and discuss it reasonably ("if this happens, I'd really have to leave, and neither of us wants that to happen"). You are NOT making threats. Make this clear. Explain that you will keep your manager informed as the situation evolves, and that you will not leave without warning.

    If you start getting frustrated with anything other than the economy, calm down and pick up the conversation later.

    Bottom line: decide what kind of sacrifices this company is worth to you, and get in on the big picture.

    Good luck.

    --
    "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler". - Albert Einstein

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  151. Not en Masse, but Successive by DaRat · · Score: 1

    I've been in a couple of situations where we were all pretty unhappy. But, both times, most of us found new positions (in different companies) before quitting so we ended up quitting in succession rather than all at once.

    In the current environment, I'd suggest finding a landing spot before jumping. I quit my last job without having a landing spot secured, but that was 3 years ago, and it was only 2 weeks before I found a new position.

  152. Walk out from ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About a year ago I was a part of a team of 6 sales consultants for an ISP in the midwest. The company had gone through a series of buy outs which threw our commision plans, insurance, and job descriptions into chaos. We ended up having to fight to retain our customers who were all very unhappy about the drop in service quality they had encountered under our new management. After months of argueing with the new suits about how their decisions were affecting both our livelyhoods as well as the company image we all took jobs elsewhere and left... all within two weeks of each other. Needless to say this left the office with out any reps to either bring in new business or retain the existing customers who then left in mass. That office has yet to recover, and to date has not been able to replace the whole we left. Last I heard they had but a single consultant hired, who was using the job to bring in some money while he continued to look for work elsewhere.

    Granted we were sales consultants, which is definately a different job market than most admins fill. Also this was a year ago, when the market was slightly better than today. However, the impact our action had on that company remains obvious. My word of advice: get a new job lined up before making the exodus. No reason to hurt yourself to prove a point.

  153. Been there, done that. Twice. by khendron · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've been there and done that twice in my career. The circumstances were slightly different. The companies were not in deep doo-doo, but there was a well defined lack of respect towards the development team/department.

    In neither case was the mass exodus (ME) planned, in the sitting around and plotting sense. It just happened. In both cases, the ME was preceded by a spontaneous, manager-led, group bitch session, where all the disgruntled employees got together and described what was unsatisfactory about their jobs. The complaints were summarized and sent up the ladder. If your place of employment has reached the spontaneous bitch session stage, expect a ME to follow.

    Here are some interesting results from the MEs I have experienced.

    • In both cases, I found immediate re-employment.
    • In the first ME (in which a full one-quarter of the company's employees jumped ship), a number of the ex-employees (myself not included) formed their own competing company, and promptly got sued by the old employer. Today, almost a decade later, the case is still before the courts. I expect the eventual loser will be forced out of business.
    • Stupid legal actions aside (see previous point), in neither case was the company that was a victim of the ME mortally wounded. Each has recovered nicely.
    • In the first ME, many employees in the affected department that showed loyalty and did not quit were fired within a year.
    • In the second ME, many employees in the affected department that showed loyalty and did not quit were offered enormous raises.
    • I do not regret leaving either company.
    • If you leave a company in an ME, expect to never be welcome back to that company as an employee ever again. This can have unforseen side-effects. In the second ME there was an employee who left the company close to the same time who were not really part of the ME. However he was *perceived* to be part of the ME, and when he tried to return to the company a couple of years later he was told he was not welcome.
    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
  154. exit with grace by asr_man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's the first few questions you'll be asked at your next job interview?

    Why are you looking for a job?

    Why did you leave your previous job?

    Would your former employer rehire you?

    Make sure the way you exit provides the best possible answers to these questions. You'll regret it if not.

    When I was in a similar situation, I got the next job first and then I wrote two resignation letters: the one wanted to send, which is still fun to read, and the cordial one I did send. The object is not so much to avoid burning bridges but to let them stew in the regret of not to being able to hold on to such a desirable employee. Flip the bird on the way out and it'll only give you more trouble later.

    1. Re:exit with grace by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Everyone is talking about burning bridges but how many people does it affect? I've never done anything to outright insult my former employers but I have noticed that my references don't necessarily have as much impact as I thought they would in looking for new employment. Secondly, I often list people I respect or people I'm on good terms with as references instead of bad bosses I hated.

      Lastly, what prevents you from lying to your new employer about the situation at your old company? I'm not saying this is moral or anything, but I've embellished past situations quite a bit and none of them seemed to care that much and accepted any explanation I had (except for one employer who dug deeper).

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    2. Re:exit with grace by asr_man · · Score: 1

      It doesn't affect anyone until the question is asked. That's a risk you don't need to take when hunting for another paycheck. So it's a useless wall just balancing there -- why disturb it and give it a chance to drop on you?

      When there are lots of resumes the HR folks will narrow the choices by elimination. Negative attributes will play their role in eliminating you from consideration among a pool of similarly qualified applicants -- unfairly or not.

      Quite right, having what you consider good references doesn't make you the prime candidate. But lacking any or having bad ones will eliminate you fast.

      You have to ask youself how eager you are to be employed by a company that doesn't screen its employees well. If you're desperate for a job then it's not an issue, but in the long run you'll be stuck working with jerks like the ones in the last job you bailed out of.

      Embellishing your resume in ways that puts your performance in a favorable light isn't lying, that's called Good Marketing. I think that's protected by the fifth amendment or something. Intentionally misrepresenting the facts (education, employment history, salaries) will come back to bite sooner or later. Smart people don't risk it. Show your best side only, but accurately.

    3. Re:exit with grace by El+Volio · · Score: 1

      A lot of companies no longer ask these questions for legal reasons; I know mine (a very large US phone company) definitely doesn't. Point remains, though, that one should leave professionally.

      --

      "You can never have too many elephants on your team."

    4. Re:exit with grace by asr_man · · Score: 1

      I was aware of the illegality of asking questions about gender, ethnicity, age, and so on but what is it about these questions that put the hiring company at risk of legal action?

      I see how the references in the employee's previous company might face a lawsuit for the consequences of inappropriate answers, but not the hiring company doing the asking. Enlighten me...?

    5. Re:exit with grace by El+Volio · · Score: 1

      I don't know, actually. It might have something to do with civil liability. The lawyers don't ask us grunts before they hand down edicts and they (unfortunately) rarely explain the reasoning. Too bad, because it would hopefully help us make on-the-spot decisions that aren't covered by previous instructions.

      --

      "You can never have too many elephants on your team."

  155. COBRA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    COBRA coverage normally covers eligibles for 18 months after a termination or qualified reduction in hours.

  156. Burning Bridges by Katz_is_a_moron · · Score: 1

    Who will you use for a reference at your old company once it becomes clear that you organized an en masse departure? You will have to be totally honest with prospective employers, because they will find out happened when they make inquires about you at the company you help screw.

    Most people don't want to hire a "troublemaker".

    1. Re:Burning Bridges by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Most companies have a policy of only verifiying dates of employment, compensation and title. Anything else opens them to the possibility of a lawsuit.

      As for references, a couple of companies I've worked for (Dell included) have a policy of not allowing themselves to be used for references. This didn't stop my boss (I was a contractor) from letting me put him down as a personal reference.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  157. Sweet Justice by japes · · Score: 1

    What great stories. I must admit I have to tell you this story and I do, really I do, wish that it happened to me but it actually happened to a friend of mine that worked at a mid-size company that was being bought out by another.....

    as it turns out Mike ( named changed to protect the smart and thoughtful ) worked for Company A, a mid-size software company in Massachusetts around Rt 128. Company B came along to buy out the company and as these things often do, often merge the redundant groups and provide a lot of layoffs. HR was gone, Marketing was gone, IT Staff usually trimmed but in this case it was rumored to be cut.

    Like many in these situations, work is tough to get done as most time is relegated to discussing potential effects on the department and finding info from those in the know.

    As the fateful day came the friendly and close development staff that worked together for a number of years recognized that they ran the company infrastructure, no bones about it, sole ownership of passwords, root passwords, etc, etc, etc.

    Management from Company B approached the development staff as a whole and presented their offer. Nothing. They were to document their usernames and passwords, locations of code and document archives and file systems, gather their things, and leave. B***s*** as I would be too, my friend Mike proposed to his group over lunch to leave, and leave nothing, no passwords, no way to maintain the current network, no way to get in and chnage passwords, nothing.

    This may sound vengeful but you must understand that no attempt was made to find a common ground or mediation by Company B, Company A made every effort to ease the blow of Company B's takeover including having HR offer helpful ways to find other jobs, write up resumes, set up healthy severance. Company B hindered if not cancelled all that.

    Mike and his 4 friends put their trust in each other and held out at home waiting, waiting for that call. And then it came, asking all 5 to come in for a negotiation.
    Initially, the offer was to hire them back immediately, but smarts prevailed as Mike knew that once they walked back in, changed passwords as they were to be instructed, a pink slip would be shoved in their hand before they opened their first cold Coke ( thats fast ).

    To make a long story short, 5 guys split one very very very healthy severance. They all suddenly went on vacation then started a new company. They are still friends to this day.

  158. The United States and the "corporations" by zogger · · Score: 1

    We wouldn't have a USA if it wasn't for corporations. But wait, I don't mean because they were so beloved, on the contrary, way back then they realised they were too powerful, and lead to massive abuses. Our "revolt" against the british was more a revolt against exploitation by powerful and monopolistic corporations, who had already co opted british society. We then went on to make a nation founded on the belief that the individual had supreme political power, then the states, then the union. Corporations were regulated back to a government granted charter, and it had to be non abusive and of a benefit to the people as a whole, and not granted *solely* as a boon to some vague shareholders or owners. i.e., they had to follow a guideline to be pro-USA first, not pro profits *only*. Profits were allowed,obviously, but not at the expense of the publics well being, and corporations were watched all the time in case they needed their legality revoked.

    some historical reference

    http://www.adbusters.org/magazine/28/usa.html

    "The United States of America was born of a revolt not just against British monarchs and the British parliament but against British corporations.

    We tend to think of corporations as fairly recent phenomena, the legacy of the Rockefellers and Carnegies. In fact, the corporate presence in prerevolutionary America was almost as conspicuous as it is today. There were far fewer corporations then, but they were enormously powerful: the Massachusetts Bay Company, the Hudson's Bay Company, the British East India Company. Colonials feared these chartered entities. They recognized the way British kings and their cronies used them as robotic arms to control the affairs of the colonies, to pinch staples from remote breadbaskets and bring them home to the motherland.

    The colonials resisted. When the British East India Company imposed duties on its incoming tea (telling the locals they could buy the tea or lump it, because the company had a virtual monopoly on tea distribution in the colonies), radical patriots demonstrated. Colonial merchants agreed not to sell East India Company tea. Many East India Company ships were turned back at port. And, on one fateful day in Boston, 342 chests of tea ended up in the salt chuck.

    The Boston Tea Party was one of young America's finest hours. It sparked enormous revolutionary excitement. The people were beginning to understand their own strength, and to see their own self-determination not just as possible but inevitable.

    The Declaration of Independence, in 1776, freed Americans not only from Britain but also from the tyranny of British corporations, and for a hundred years after the document's signing, Americans remained deeply suspicious of corporate power. They were careful about the way they granted corporate charters, and about the powers granted therein.

    Early American charters were created literally by the people, for the people as a legal convenience. Corporations were "artificial, invisible, intangible," mere financial tools. They were chartered by individual states, not the federal government, which meant they could be kept under close local scrutiny. They were automatically dissolved if they engaged in activities that violated their charter. Limits were placed on how big and powerful companies could become. Even railroad magnate J. P. Morgan, the consummate capitalist, understood that corporations must never become so big that they "inhibit freedom to the point where efficiency [is] endangered."

    The two hundred or so corporations operating in the US by the year 1800 were each kept on fairly short leashes. They weren't allowed to participate in the political process. They couldn't buy stock in other corporations. And if one of them acted improperly, the consequences were severe. In 1832, President Andrew Jackson vetoed a motion to extend the charter of the corrupt and tyrannical Second Bank of the United States, and was widely applauded for doing so. That same year the state of Pennsylvania revoked the c

  159. Wage packets are not hand-outs! by cabraverde · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There are a lot of comments along the lines of
    • "You're lucky to have a job at all, be grateful"
    • "Walk out & you'll be poor and destitute"
    • "You need them more than they need you"
    etcetera. What crap. We are not some defenceless suckling infants dependent on the generous charity of our employers, we are in a relationship of equals where we exchange labour for money. When did we forget that?

    If pay & working conditions become unacceptable, we quit them. If our behaviour or our productivity is unacceptable, they quit us. It's not like we've taken wedding vows for chrissake.

    If you are drawing more salary than you are worth, go ahead - keep your head down & milk it before your employer realises this. But if you give value for money then you do not need to act like the subservient partner. Jobs are tricky to find at the moment, but good employees are not easy to come by either.

    Of course it's prudent to have somewhere else lined up before you quit. Just as it's wise for a company to find someone to cover for the guy they're about to fire. I just object to people acting like their employment contract is their most valued possession, rather than their skills, initiative & integrity. Have some confidence in yourselves!
  160. PLEASE MOD PARENT UP by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1

    It really bothers me that the submitter mentions nothing about actually going and talking things over with management. If the company really is in rough waters, the managers are probably up to their eyeballs in work as well, meaning maybe they've been too busy to realize that their employees are surreptitiously getting the shaft. All it might take is broaching the subject with management that you are unhappy with the current situation.

    A similar thing happened at my company a few years ago. We really were in dire straights, but we did get a bunch of extra stock options and other benefits, and when things turned around we all ended up with very large raises.

  161. ad hoc union by derch · · Score: 1

    So you guys have formed an ad hoc union? Good. Now before walking out, sit down with the owners and upper management. Explain your view of the situation, ask for concrete assurances and solutions to make your work environment more tolerable.

    Obviously if you are as important to the company as you say you are, then the company wants to keep you. Without you, the company falls.

    Also, take an objective look at the work conditions. Is the entire company tightening the belt? Have the owners and upper management forgone bonuses, perhaps even pay? If everyone else is putting in the extra time, taking shit, and in general it's a good company with a good product, then you're being a whiny punk ass bitch. On the other hand, if it's an Enron situation, your department really is in the shit, and the company isn't willing to meet you halfway, then walk en masse.

    There will be negative consequences. You'll loose frienships. You're going to regret the choice when you start living off peanut butter sandwiches. BUT! You will have followed in the footsteps of other workers who decided not to take shit, and you will still have your humanity.

    My suggestion, pick up copies of the Ani Difranco w/ Utah Philips' CDs. The old union songs and stories will inspire you. Afterall, companies didn't give us the eight hour day. Workers died for so we could only work eight hours a day, and it's a disgrace to their memory to let a company walk all over you.

    "We Want Bread and Roses To"

  162. The one time I did this by hoover10001 · · Score: 1
    The one time I did this, they had to beg me to stay on for an extra 2 weeks, in order for me to train the 4 people who they needed to replace me.

    Bwwaaaaaghahahahah, stupid gits.

  163. be serious by bobrankle · · Score: 1

    Time for that is way past. In this situation it would be fun (in the cruel sort of way) to get everyone to follow, but think we need to be serious. In this market, no one is guaranteed (well very few) a job anymore. I just spent 13 months 'independent consulting' looking for a full time position; now you may be able to find a job quick, but think of the others that may not and unless you want to supplement their income, it sounds like a case where you start looking find and leave and let the chips there fall where they may. Just the search itself may be really eyeopening as to what it is like out there now.

  164. counter-offers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I found myself in a similar position due to cutbacks, and rather then walking, I approached my boss and the HR person and told them very bluntly that while there was I time that I loved my work and remained dedicated to the organization, I was feeling abused and on the path to rapid burnout and was prepared to risk months of unemployment to remedy the situation (by walking). to my utter amazement, they had absolutely no idea that I felt that abused (mind you, this very same duo had condensed three jobs into mine without changing my compensation). I was told they would do all they could the remedy the situation, given a (small) raise, and given two weeks of "comp" vacation time.


    of course, I realized that anyone so clueless as to think I was happy and my position was well-concieved would never actually be able to resolve the problems they had created by merging so many jobs into mine, so I began actively (albeit quietly) job hunting. things were better for the next few months, I found something better, and was able to leave on good terms. the temptation to tell my boss to go f*ck herself once the position went completely pear-shaped was great, but I'm glad I resisted. being blunt and forthright about how bad things had gotten, however, was a great call.


    my old boss said it best: if you work 60-90 hours a week and feel abused, there is either something wrong with you or something wrong with your job.

    -jw.

  165. Techno Union by Nobody's+Hero · · Score: 1

    Why don't we all for a union of technological workers to stop this sh!t from happening to our brothers in arms. No one should be working 70-80 hour weeks. Factory workers wouldn't do it. Why should we?

    Seriously, we need something to protect our interests...

    --
    The Only Person Willing to be Me is ME!
    1. Re:Techno Union by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't we? Because we're supposed to be more intelligent than someone just doing manual labor. We work more with our brains rather than our bodies. We shouldn't have to pay into a union because we're too ignorant to help ourselves, and look for other work.

      Unions, generally, are for people who have little job skill, other than moving around sheet metal, and don't have the brain power to realize that they don't have to work at once place for whatever they get paid forever.

      Yea, the job market is pretty bleak now, but it won't be that way forever. Remember all those PC's and servers we were all installing/upgrading in the late 90's... well, they're getting old again.

    2. Re:Techno Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't we all for a union of technological workers to stop this sh!t from happening to our brothers in arms. No one should be working 70-80 hour weeks. Factory workers wouldn't do it. Why should we?


      These always work well... look at the US steel industry... oh wait. Well, then there's the US textile industry. Damn. Hang on, I'm starting to see a trend.

  166. Don't Quit by havoc · · Score: 1

    Don't just quit, it won't have the results you would anticipate anyway. A group of us did this at a large Fruit company one time. With little problems they were able to bring in consultants that had worked there in the past to fill in the gaps until they could hire replacements.

    A better solution is to, as a group, stick to a 40 hour work week. This will insure that you are not being too overworked and still will receive a paycheck for a long time to come. If and when they decide you aren't "pulling your load" which probably won't happen if they are as short handed as you say, they will be forced to lay you off (they probably won't fire you unless you give them just cause above and beyond just working your required hours). In this way you will be able to collect unemployment (which they have to foot part of!) and it will not reflect negatively on your resume.

  167. I took the shit, the result? by twitter · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A few months of pure missery and 8 months of unemployment. If the company is fucked and you and your friends can make a go of it withouth them, do it. There's no point in taking grief from a bunch of do nothings. Reasonable companies are run by the professionals who make them work: law partnerships, hospitals, engineering consultancies, you name it. Your masters have tried to tell you where you stand in the world. Good luck.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I took the shit, the result? by red+floyd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reasonable companies are run by the professionals who make them work:..., hospitals,

      Totally OT, but what the hell. Hospitals are not run by the pros who make them work. Ever talk to a nurse? I'm married to one. The patient/RN ratio is insane, and they keep cutting back on staff. Almost the exact situation the article poster described. And their union doesn't seem to be much help...

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    2. Re:I took the shit, the result? by TheCarp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well theres only so much their union can do... if Nurses were to actually strike or stop working, people die.

      If they slow or partially strike, only keeping people where they are needed absolutly to prevent that, then those few would be worked to death themselves.

      Thats the real peroblem there, their hands are tied because the only people who can really be made to suffer by them are the patients, and thats exactly who they became nurses to help.

      Of course then again, I supose if they really struck the doctos would just have to pick up the slack and do all the nurses functions. That would be poetic justice.

      But ask any nurse and they can tell you what would happen if you left all the nurses chores up to doctors... people would die even faster :)

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:I took the shit, the result? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      this brings up todays random insider fact:

      doctors at kaiser permanente have up to TWO THOUSAND patients each if the local area is saturated with enough patients.

  168. Been considering this in our job place. But.. by darkmayo · · Score: 1

    the problem is getting everyone aboard.

    At our jobsite the majority of people are contractors.. very specialized contractors that aren't easy to replace so they just can hire more people to replace us without months of training.
    (Which our clients certainly won't stand for)

    Because of the recent Compaq/HP merger we got royally screwed regarding our status as contractors.. We haven't had raises in years we have people working on the same jobs as us doing the same work yet because they are HP they work less get alot more money as well as bonuses better benefits and everything.. meanwhile they keep dangling the carrot of being absorbed into HP/compaq in our faces.. as they take away what we had before..

    If we where to do a walk out it would be to force there hand and absorb us..

    --
    "I am a kernel in the linux army"
  169. Stop by trifster · · Score: 1

    Work what you are getting paid. Tell the management they want more pay or goto hell. When they fire you, sue sue sue. Document all, bring tape recorders, backup files and emails!!! SUE SUE SUE.

  170. Always be loyal to yourself before the company, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    as company loyalty to you will only exist as long as you are seen to be useful.

    I've lived it. I worked in an office of 13 people in 1995/96 (the good times), management changed, over the next six months, eleven people left in total, two resigned (I was the second), and I was number nine out of the eleven.

    Its scary to go interstate on business for the end of the week / week-end, and never see a work mate again. Its as though they died in a car crash.

    This doesn't mean be disloyal to the company, just make sure it is always in your best interests to be there.

    When it isn't, leave.

  171. More importantly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... we should note the incorrect usage of "its".

    the company realizes its in deep financial shit

    There should be an apostrophe for the contraction of "it is".

  172. we're all consumables by ed.han · · Score: 1

    that's why it's called *human* resources. as far as the employer is concerned, you're all cogs in the machine. it's that simple.

    that being said: what's the best case scenario if you do what you're contemplating? and what's the worst case?

    if the company is in trouble, you should already be looking for another job--i trust you aren't actually waiting for a white knight?

    ed

  173. Enron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for Enron, and I can say that this may work for some "core" people. Specially if you have some very particular skills difficult to find. I personally waited until I found a job (play it safe), and then give my self the satisfaction to quit. It was great, they offer me more money etc, but at that point you are in control... One of the best satisfactions in my life.
    In the other hand you own to yourself to be respected, do not let them own you just because they pay you... If your whole department agrees to that go ahead, and teach corporate america a lesson!

  174. Brand Recognition by natet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the key to the JBOSS consultants walking out is brand recognition. They all worked on a product that is pretty well known in its solution space. Each of them was a key player in making JBoss the product it is today. Therefore, they could start a company based on the work that they had been doing, and have a reasonable chance for success. This is an unusual situation, because JBoss is open source. Most products produced by companies aren't, and so the developers on that project aren't as likely to be as well known (if they are known at all). This makes trying to form your own company that much harder because you can't really tell potential clients what you have to offer.

    --
    IANAL... But I play one on /.
  175. You will have a lawsuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure Does smell like a lawsuit! Unless you are part of a union it is illegal to organize other employees to quit with you. This is an unfair labor practice that will leave you unemployed with lots of legal bills. To quit on your own is fine, but to encourage your entire department to quit will get you in big trouble.

  176. Talk to your boss... by shaunj · · Score: 1

    Have you tried just telling the higher-ups how you all feel? Don't let them brush you off with "well we're tight on money". Tell them that you understand the financial troubles and that the current situation is unreasonable. Go in with a compromising solution that you can both agree on.

    People are usually reasonable if you treat them as equals.

    -Shaun

  177. Greatest senese of satisfaction!!! by aluminumtulips · · Score: 1

    I once worked for Levy Restaurant Group at a Rosebud Italian restaurant in a primarily Jewish neighborhood. I requested off the Xmas holidays(December 24 & 25) three months previous to the days and was told "Don't worry, we're not open on those days." We are one of the few Catholic families in the area and was relieved to hear that I would be able to go to Church AND spend time with my family. Well, on December 22nd, my boss approaches me and says "I need you to work one of the two days. Business should be good since most people around here are Jewish and don't celebrate Xmas. Which shift do you want, the 24th or the 25th?" I told him neither; I was going to spend the days with my family. He just stared right through me and said "I know you'll make the right choice. Think about it." I thought about it alright. I told him "My family is more important to me than this fuckin' job." and quit in the middle of my shift in a packed restaurant. After the holidays were over, he called me every other day for nearly three weeks asking if I wanted to work. Aparently, five other servers did the exact same thing! If we had known what each of the others was going to do, we may have been able to bring our grievences to the table and been able to come to an agreement of sorts. NEVER stay anywhere you are not appreciated or respected. And ALWAYS try to stay unionized whenever possible. Strength in numbers may get you what you want.

  178. Options by pubjames · · Score: 1

    You suddenly find yourself working 50-60 hour weeks, put on call with no compensation, given unreasonable amounts of work and generally treated like dirt.

    Sensible options:

    1) Start looking for another job.
    2) Become self employed.
    3) Consider a career change.

    Too many people are scared of options 2 and 3. They are real options, and to prempt your response, yes you can.

    Not sensible option:

    Try to change the behaviour of your employer.
    Try to get 'revenge'.

  179. An idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're as important as you say you are, then why not use the threat of quitting as leverage to better your current situation?

  180. Respect vs. Money by corvi42 · · Score: 1

    So far in the other posts I've read, it seems that a lot of people are concerned about unemployment. They say that you better have a new job lined up before jumping ship on your current one, because you'll have a tough time getting new work in the current economy. I'd like to interject a different opinion here for a moment.

    Personally I've spent a lot of my career free-lancing, so maybe I've gotten used to the intermittent nature of this line of work, but honestly I don't think being out of work is really so bad. Also, I haven't found that there has been a great drop in available employment, but that may just be my anecdotal experience. However, all that being said, the issue really comes down to how much do you value your self-respect.

    Ultimately you have to make a decision, and draw a personal line somewhere which represents how much do you value your self-respect. It may sound facile to try to put a dollars-and-cents pricetag on this, but really that's what you're doing anyway, so you might as well think about it that way. Ask yourself a few questions:
    1) how much is my self respect worth?
    2) how much of my self respect involves doing a particular job?

    Once you've thought these through, you'll be in a better position to figure out whether you want to quit or not. How much crap can you suck up before whatever money you're making isn't worth it anymore? Personally, I've had to quit quite lucrative jobs because the kind of crap that was flying around simply wasn't worth it. I'd rather be broke for whatever time it takes than make good money and be miserable about it.

    Also think about how much you feel like you need to be doing a particular job to be happy with yourself. Again, I'd rather take a joe-job flipping burgers or telemarketing ( *gasp* - yes even that ) than put up with the crap some companies impose. You've got to decide which is more important to your sense of self, being a professional "..." ( programmer, sysadmin, whatever... ) or being treated with respect. At least in a burger flipping situation you won't be nearly so intimidated to tell your boss to F-off when he's an @$$, because after all, who the hell is he anyway?

    This brings me to my third point. Have you tried discussing the problems with your boss? I'm always amazed by how many people would rather take drastic actions than spend a few minutes discussing the issue with those involved. It can be emotionally heated, and intimidating, but sometimes that's the point, you want that emotion to be there - because then maybe the boss will understand how much this stuff actually affects you. You'd really be amazed how sometimes an honest, rational 5 minute chat can transform a relationship, work-related or otherwise. Maybe you should go to your boss ( either individually or as a group ) and say "look, I have a problem with X, Y, and Z, and its something we need to deal with... lets talk". A little tip - you get better results by trying to engage them in solving the problem than by being confrontational and aggressive. Your self-respect isn't something that they get the right to walk all over just because they're your boss, sometimes they need to be reminded of that fact in a friendly no-BS way. The worst that can happen is you find out that they really are the jerks you feared they were, and so you can still quit.

    Don't forget that even in a market where the supply of labour is high relative to the demand, they still need you around. You provide essential services to the company, and even if they can replace you, what will it do to them trying to fill in the gap until they've found someone else. How much downtime and lost productivity will they suffer until you've been replaced? It's a major pain for them to spend that time finding someone, training them ( or at least getting them up to speed on how things work ), etc. It will cost them something to replace you, so you've still got some bargaining muscle.

    So in the end it's your decision, you've got to figure out how bad

    --

    There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
  181. it is called a strike. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    IT has been known to wrokd from time to time.
    Go all the way, get some signs.
    If you are key to the company, then they'll talk.'Latly, I've been thinking of starting a sight to orgnize a nation wide IT professional strike. we would pretty much bring the country to its knees.

    After the strike GET A CONTRACT, otherwise they will just train someone to take your job. I mean, you did have the gall to demand a reasonble work week, and worl conditions.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:it is called a strike. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um.

      1. Unions (and to an extent, strikes) are a mechanism for giving power to workers who would otherwise be powerless, particularly blue-collar workers who can't really argue that their skills are unique or hard to replace.

      2. IT workers are white-collar "knowledge workers", professionals in the same class as engineers. If you are an IT worker, you are not powerless, you are expected to have the skills and ability to negotiate your own contracts on the basis of your own skills. (Look at the rather poor history of Boeing's engineering union.)

      3. Have you looked at Monster.com and Dice.com lately? There aren't that many jobs, and there are a lot of out-of-work IT people. Try to pull a strike in those conditions without the protection of a union and watch as you and those out-of-work IT people trade places.

      4. Before you consider starting a *site* to *organize* a *nationwide* "IT professional strike", learn to spell and/or type.

      5. If your work conditions are so bad, why are you posting to Slashdot during the work day?

  182. Blackball by tmark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you do organize a mass walkout, which screws the rest of the company like you think it will, prepare for the likelihood that anyone who knows or hears anything about the incident - including your managers, people who know your managers, your co-workers, your friends, and even your collegaues who walk out with you - will remember that you were all sh*t disturbers who acted and colluded in a particular way to screw your company when things got tough. The world is smaller than you think.

    It would take me about 1 second to decide toss a resume of a guy in your situation who did what you plan to. Nobody needs agitators, least of all a company in somewhat dire straits.

    If things are so bad, quit, by yourself. If things are bad for others, they'll probably quit too. But getting others involved in an organized fashion for the explicit purpose of making it tough for the company is unprofessional and will rightly brand you as a trouble maker.

    1. Re:Blackball by praedor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      God! What PLANET are you people from? Have you NEVER heard anything about UNIONS? This is precisely the point of UNIONS. They are GOOD, they are RIGHT, they are on your side. The company (any company) is not sacrosanct with the right to do anything, demand anything, from its employees. You have rights and unions work to protect those rights.


      How is the exploitation and abuse of workers today, regardless of the enterprise (hi tech is not magically apart or separate), OK and not deserving protection by unionization but the abuse of yesteryear, often the SAME TYPE OF ABUSE/EXPLOITATION, was properly addressed by unions? You illogical, business-worshipping fools and hypocrits.


      Workers, regardless of the enterprise, gain leverage and protection of their rights, improving the lot of ALL of you, vs the excesses of management demands by unionization. It is democratic (vote-based) and protective (you get some protection for financial loss during prolonged strikes). You are also working for your greater, collective good. Better pay/equal pay for equal work. Reasonable hours w/fair, reasonable, and just compensation for overtime, and protection from retaliation by management.


      What a load of overprivaledged, money-worshipping (money = right), screw-the-worker people you all are.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    2. Re:Blackball by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

      Except it would be illegal to mention such a thing in a reference call... all you are *legally* allowed to do (from my limited knowledge IANAL etc etc) is confirm/deny the time period a person worked for you. Thanks to several lawsuits, to do anything more you can be sued (even if you are telling the truth.)

    3. Re:Blackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cite the statute, please.

    4. Re:Blackball by brlancer · · Score: 1
      Nobody needs agitators, least of all a company in somewhat dire straits.

      Don't you think the agitator is the employer who is abusing the employee?

      I find it disheartening that you seem to view the companies behaviour as entirely acceptable while insulting someone who is trying to gain enough employee strength to find for proper working conditions. Blackball is right--where would any industry be if not for "agitators" and "trouble makers"?

      --
      Someone asked if I had patched against MSBlast; I said yes, I installed Linux.
    5. Re:Blackball by Nobody's+Hero · · Score: 1

      Amen Brother.... I'm with you. there's nothing wrong with wanting a fair pay/pay for overtime/protection from retaliation. I want to be treated fairly as much as the next guy. Now I can negotiate a contract. And I have and I believe I am being payed fairly. But at the same time. Some people aren't. I know guys who are working for pennies to do some jobs that are more complicated than my own. I know you'll say "quit" and get a new job. but it's not that easy. A union would help greatly....

      --
      The Only Person Willing to be Me is ME!
    6. Re:Blackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read up about what happened to unions in the US and the people in them during their early days. Blackballing was a relatively low concern then.

    7. Re:Blackball by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 0, Troll

      This is precisely the point of UNIONS. They are GOOD, they are RIGHT, they are on your side.

      Yup... they sure worked well for the auto and steel industries in the USA. We've lost count of how many of those good manufacturing jobs were shipped overseas. And to make matters worse, now those same unions that supposedly cared about your job before it was shipped off are now trying to organize that foreign labor!

      There was another example of this that occurred literally down the door from me. There are a lot of Mexican field workers picking mushrooms on the farms here (Chester County, PA) and a few years back they tried to organize in protest of bad working conditions. Eventually they were allowed to organize. What was their reward for this effort? They were replaced with different people.

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    8. Re:Blackball by DrProton · · Score: 1

      It seems as if the company can do no wrong in your eyes. Is the onus of moral behavior always on the employee? How bad does the company's behavior have to become before the employees are justified in walking out? When does the word get out that the company was screwing the employees? Workers have the right to organize in the US, and in many situations it behooves them to organize.

      --
      "Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens." - Schiller
    9. Re:Blackball by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      Your examples don't negate the fact that the employees could have been much worse off without the unions. There is no way to know for sure. In particular, I can't see how a lack of unionization would have prevented most of these jobs from moving overseas - differences in costs of living standards alone are usually a much larger difference than any union financial 'penalties'.

      Unions aren't necessarily a silver bullet for everyone involved, but neither is anarcho-capitalism. I certainly know which one would be better for my peers and I, though....

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    10. Re:Blackball by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

      couldn't find a statute, but this might help.
      Fair Measures did an article about it, scroll down to the giving and taking references part.

  183. Good Luck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Destroy all notes. Remove all documentation.
    You don't want it to be easy for them to replace you. Make sure you can collect unemployment benefits. Most states won't allow you to collect if you quit. You need to be layed off or fired (most states impose 2 weeks waiting time if you were fired). Or you can line up new work, and as a group
    give your notice and leave!

  184. DO IT by Great+Malinko · · Score: 0

    If the company cant see it comming, or do nothing about it, your working at the wrong place anyway. If the Company can see it comming and decided to deceive you with empty promises, well you get the picture. 90% of them promises are emtpy, if not 100%

  185. Watch out for Judas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once worked for a place where managment was sooo bad that the developers talked open mutiny. Watch out for a traitor within your group or a seemingly sympathetic person from outside your group. Be careful about who you trust.

    Is there a way such that you can re-engineer the situation (or code) such that you are indispensable? Take inspiration from the IT legend about the old COBOL programmer who is left alone because he is the only one in the company who understands the payrol (or whatever) program.

    Perhaps you can be busy fixing mysterous bugs...such that nobody knows or possibly suspects how those bugs developed...or how long it will take to fix them.

  186. Easy solution for on call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. sorry, but I'm too drunk to drive to work.

  187. Watched it happen ... by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 1

    I remember the programming departments from a company I work with doing that. They quit, formed a consulting company and now have the former company as a contract ... Usually doesn't turn out quite as rosey as you would like ... hint if you have kids or a pet fish to support, don't do it... very very scary and you might endup having to serve the kids the pet fish for supper.

    --
    TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
  188. Turn it around. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Perhaps you ought to think about how lucky you are to even HAVE a job right now.

    No, the company is lucky to have them and should behave. If the company is really on the way out and these folks can do without them, they should as soon do it as soon as possible. Why sit around and eat shit until the company fails, FOR NO FAULT OF THEIRS? Someone at that company is screwing up or does not belong there. It's not the programmers. A partnership will be tough, but they will be there eventually and might as well start rectruiting useful people before they all make other plans.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  189. Preparation by Durendal · · Score: 1

    Prepare, and help your co-workers prepare. Look for alternative employment. Make sure you have enough savings to ride out 6mo to a year of no job. Investigate the financial position of the company carefully. Are the managers looking looking for another job? How do you feel about doing something else or working somewhere else?

    Once you and your comrades have done most of these things, arrange a meeting with the head of the company via your manager. Be professional. Be prepared to show this person a SOLUTION. He will not be sympathetic to complainers. Demonstrate to the chief that your changes will save/make the company money.

    If the boss agrees, monitor the progress of the changes to be sure they really happen. If not, You have packed your parachute.

    Good Luck

  190. screw the company softly like this... by esoinila · · Score: 1

    You and your co-workers make your own company and sell the work to your current company.

    If you all flee to form your own company then they'll be hard pressed to replace the entire knowledgebase of your team especially as I assume you and your team have documented things as usual in the business - everything's in your and your coworkers head and your boss dont know computer from a camel.
    --------
    Erno

  191. Integrity and Workers Rights Not In Fashion on /. by desertcrevasse · · Score: 1

    The number of comments that mention something to the effect of "good luck finding a new job" are very disturbing in light of how the poster summarizes the circumstances of the consultants. I am taking for granted that the gist of the summary is truthful, namely that the consultants were underpaid and overworked. Workers have a right to organize in that situation, and any like it where the are being treated similarly unfairly. Programmers, IT personnel, and other highly-skilled workers have the same rights as auto workers when it comes to unfair work environments. Why should they be laughed at, or wished sarcastic best wishes for having the integrity to demand workplace fairness? If their workplace environment was unfair as advertised, I say good luck and God bless for having the integrity to demand fairness at the risk of future employment.

    The "you just deal with it for fear of losing your job" attitude is tantamount to placating dictators. Perhaps workplace conditions for higly-skilled technological workers are not so bad yet, but such an attitude will surely cultivate managerial dictators and workplace slums if it continues.

  192. A good way to continue the exodus of IT jobs... by PrymeEvyl · · Score: 1

    Pulling these kind of stunts is what causes the bigwigs to scratch their heads and say "Why do we put up with this? Let's just fire the whole department and move/outsource our IT to India for 1/10th the cost!" Remember: That Indian IT worker will work 80 hours without even THINKING of complaining, and will work it for 1/10th what they pay you. He/she most likely has more formal education specialized in that field than you. Be thankful you still have your job.

    1. Re:A good way to continue the exodus of IT jobs... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Let's just fire the whole department and move/outsource our IT to India for 1/10th the cost!"

      Right now the company I work for can get reasonable programming contractors on site for $30/hr. The Indian outsourcing firms want $25/hr.

      Given the improved communications with the onsite programmers, we feel that outsourcing to India is too expensive.

  193. Mod this one up. by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    This guy makes the most sense so far!

    1. Re:Mod this one up. by AgentSmith1000 · · Score: 0

      Yes, Communication makes sense. If you situation doesn't improve after you "communicate" then get you and your fellow grunts a back window out by all finding jobs. Then walk out together. Or form your own company.

      This argument about walkout has come up ad infinitum. When you leave your company, tell your friends, tell anyone you know not to work for this company. If they think your job is replaceable, how are they going to replace it if Management can't find anyone to work the job. Anyone know if there's a website where companies can be blacklisted? It'd be nice to know what companies to avoid when looking for the next job. Let those companies stew in IT oblivion.

  194. I concur by kiwimate · · Score: 1

    To be rather callous, however, if you do do this, let /. know about it 24 hours in advance so the hordes of unemployed /.ers here can be ready to apply for your jobs three minutes after you leave.

    More germanely, I find myself wondering what it is you hope to achieve? Are you just trying to "stick it to the company"? Or are you looking for leverage?

    If the latter, it's probably not going to work. If the former (which I suspect is the case), then you'll feel nice and smug for a couple of days, and then you'll realize the economy is tanked, and the bills are imminent. More power to you if you have sufficient savings, are young, and are footloose and fancy-free enough that you can afford to take such a risk. But I'd strongly caution you to think about what is in the best interests, both short-term and long-term, for number one.

  195. Just be Happy you have a job! by LumberLumber · · Score: 1

    I have been for the most part unemployeed since Feb 2001. I do some consulting work now, and I do have a part time job. But nothing beats a regular full time position where you dont have to worry about putting gas in the car or paying the rent check. --dan BTW, hire me Conderman.com

  196. Mod Parent Up by mekkab · · Score: 1

    Really, before you walk out you owe it to yourself to bargain for more.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  197. the scheme fails on two points by ellem · · Score: 1

    1 -- other people involved
    2 -- money involved

    all it takes is one person in the group to wreck this and leaving you standing alone and unemployed

    In any event you don't need your friends to go with you, grow a set and split if it is so bad.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  198. Strikes .... a little history by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

    Striking has to be done in a large enough mass that you can't all be replaced quickly enough or the company goes out of business. Historically there is another way of ..."convincing" employers. You might also look into a "work slowdown". I mean if everyone in the department just basically starts showing up minimum hours and doing only the work you can do during that time ... or less by doing it in a relaxed manor ... what is your manager going to do? do you log your hours? How do they know what you logged is correct? what if the whole group does this together and everybody covers each other in saying ... well, there is just so much work we can get done? ( every manager understands that is true at in any department... perhaps you should make it clear that in his attempt to get more done the "burn out" factor is actually hurting overall productivity. He/She will believe that when they see the numbers. Or maybe they will just fire the lot of you. Although historically they fire only the mouthpiece/ spokesperson and/or those viewed to be the ring leaders.

    Also, be careful of betrayal from within. My dad was fired one time for tring to start a union when the person from teamsters turned over the list of everyone who had been at the first meeting to his employer. We suspect "for the right price".

    In any case beware that it is a dangerous game that is a foot. Americans want to be treated like human beings, that's why employers like to outsource to other countries where a dollar goes a long way and poverty is high.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    1. Re:Strikes .... a little history by praedor · · Score: 1

      Your dad had a case against the company then. It is illegal to fire people for seeking to unionize. Organizing a union, or trying to, is fully legal and protected.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  199. Re:Please...stop modding up offtopic posts (OT) by untaken_name · · Score: 1

    Must there be profanity on the front page? That is offensive in the extreme, and also unprofessional. Words like that should not be used, when perfectly acceptable alternatives (such as "the company discovered in was in dire straits financially") would both be more eloquent and professional?

    Not professional? Since when is SLASHDOT professional? Holy fucking shit, what web page have *you* been on?
    To whoever modded this troll up:
    Is the submitter getting paid compensation for submissions? Is it what he does 'professionally'?
    Why does someone else's eloquence or professionalism matter to you? Why should someone else verbally tiptoe around a million anonymous readers just because one is too weak emotionally to see the word 'shit' without freaking out?
    What if I said that the use of the word 'extreme' offended me completely? Would you stop using it?
    Also, why should anyone care what an anonymous coward thinks anyway? The AC who posted this is either a troll or needs to remove the large stick from his/her ass. Excuse me, I mean 'posterior region.' The only moderation the parent should have received was Offtopic. Yeah, same with my post, but at least I didn't post AC, nor pretend to be on topic, nor am I *looking* for any other moderation.
    Don't mod offtopic posts up. Mod them offtopic. We couldn't (and shouldn't try to) keep everyone from posting offtopic....but at least there could be some warning for those (I hear they exist) readers who want to stay on topic.

  200. The only thing you need to know. by GeoNerd · · Score: 1

    Any business you work for will pay you as little as they can get away with.

    It is your responsibility to get as much compensation as possible out of that business.

    However you do this is up to you, but always negotiate from a position of strength.

  201. Silver Lining by edwardwong · · Score: 1
    I didn't have the guts to do it. But a friend in another department took the plunge. Being amazingly good at what he did, he found another job at a competitor faster than you could say "Lotus Notes to Exchange Migration" (he is a Microsoft Exchange expert). Worse still, he brought along several other good people with him to start his new empire. His replacements have less talent than his left toe and we're suffering bad.

    Life goes on in this shitty company. We're missing SLAs, management is breathing fire down our necks. I put up with the aforementioned 50-60 hours a week, and get overloaded with information.

    Even one of my best staff left and got a job at another company and is now earning more than me!

    I guess the moral of the story is, there are opportunities out there, sieze them well if you find them. Bring along your department while you're at it.

    --
    E.W. (as opposed to eeeeeww)
  202. Who is "the company"? by porsche911 · · Score: 1

    You keep referring to some anonymous "Company". There are "people" there with the same problems you have++. They are trying to keep their job, something like reasonable hours, and take responsibility for keeping as much of the company running as possible. I've had to lay-off 40% of my team in order to keep the other 60% employed and was able start hiring back 3 months later because we were able to turn the corner. Maybe what you need to be asking is if you are working for a company that the current management and the current economy can turn the corner and survive or if they are on a slippery slope to Chapter 11. Is there something as a team your group could do to improve the survival chances?

    -c

  203. Try this. by twitter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Q: So, why did you leave your last position?

    A: Things got rough, they treated us like dirt, I left.

    BZZZZZT, wrong answer.

    A: We did not like the way our management was handeling our product so we formed a partnership. You may be familiar with OUR_NAME and OUR_PRODUCTS and OUR_CLIENTS.

    Of course, the question only has to be answered if the partnership fails. As such partnerships are the way of free software and free software is the future, I would not project a failure. If you end up with an interviewer that wants to work you to death and dispose of you, you might be better off somewhere else.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  204. My advice? Be professional. Always. by tmoertel · · Score: 5, Insightful
    My advice? Be professional.

    That doesn't mean you must work overtime in terrible conditions for poor pay. But it does mean, if you decide to take your employment elsewhere, that you leave the company like a professional.

    Treat your reputation like a valuable possession -- because it is.

    You get together with the rest of the department for a 'fsck this company' meeting and decide to walk out.
    Sorry, but walking out is a "screw-your-employer" gesture. It's about as unprofessional as you can get and, even worse, makes you look vindictive. Is that really the impression you want to leave? Do you really want to trade a good piece of your reputation for a few fleeting moments of take-this-job-and-shove-it jubilation?

    Be professional. Give two weeks notice.

    Like most people, you are probably under an "at will" employment agreement that gives you the right to walk out whenever you please. Don't do it. Give the two weeks, which is universally considered reasonable and comes at no cost to your good reputation.

    If you do resign, tender your resignation in writing. Make it simple, polite, and direct -- professional. Something like, "I am writing to inform you of my resignation, effective on date ." That's all you need. Do not include a grand, barbed explanation of why you're leaving, which is especially tempting when you feel that your employer has wronged you.

    When your employer receives a stack of resignation letters on the same day, they'll get the point. No need for you to draw circles around it or point to it with big red arrows.

    Remember: When you leave, do so in a way that makes it clear to your employer that they are losing somebody valuable. Be professional.

    1. Re:My advice? Be professional. Always. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP this guy is giving very good advice.

    2. Re:My advice? Be professional. Always. by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Very valuable advice. Unfortunately sometimes it's hard to maintain this sort of composure when your bosses are treating you unprofessionally. This includes veiled threats, illegal activities (over working hours), lies, personal harassment etc etc. While it would be good to always be the bigger person, I feel for everyone who has broken out unprofessionally because there have been so many times I've wanted to just kick the ass out of a bad boss.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    3. Re:My advice? Be professional. Always. by praedor · · Score: 1

      Employers are NOT god! The tactic of walk-out is as old as the labor movement and is a valid response to unreasonable demands from management. They do NOT get to demand whatever they want on their whim. They have to take the human factor into account, as well as fairness. A 'strike' is a valid tool...when other forms of trying to address the problem fails. It should not be the first response but it should certainly be a response. It is not unprofessional to go on 'strike', it is a right. You would be better served to form a union and have an official organization to watch over the rights of the workers vs the over-exploitation by management, which is what management will ALWAYS attempt.


      Unions are just as relevant today as they were in the 30's. You can be just as screwed by god-complex management talking heads today as you could then.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    4. Re:My advice? Be professional. Always. by Koobiak · · Score: 1

      Times are tough. You have to suck it up and deal with it, or leave. I prefer to suck it up knowing that it will eventually get better and hoping that my employers will recognise the work that I did when other people refused.

    5. Re:My advice? Be professional. Always. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not unprofessional to go on 'strike', it is a right.

      Yeah, but you don't have any kind of right to ever work there ever again.

    6. Re:My advice? Be professional. Always. by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Working extra hours for free is your choice, ultimately. Admittedly you may be HEAVILY pressured into it (I once had a manager that said he'd fire anyone who worked less than 50 hours/week), but you can decide whether or not to succumb. You have some other options. Consider any or all of the following:

      1) Go home at 5:00 (or whatever) every night. When your manager complains,
      2) Work late and submit your overtime hours to HR. The larger the company, the more effective this is.
      3) Report the company anonymously to the local labour relations board.
      4) Be prepared to take the company to court.

      But before doing any of these, make sure you have somewhere to land. In a market like this, the squeaky wheel doesn't get the grease, it usually gets the axe!

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    7. Re:My advice? Be professional. Always. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is usually a more professional method than telling your boss to take the job and shove it which doesn't involve sucking up and taking it.

      If there are veiled threats from your boss, talk to his boss. As necessary move all the way up the chain. Not getting any response from the CEO? Write to the board of directors. Nothing from them? Go to a shareholder meeting.

      If you're being subject to illegal work conditions or personal harassment, you could always file a lawsuit along with your two-weeks notice.

      Only if the conditions are so bad that you feel you are being constructively terminated should you leave without giving notice.

    8. Re:My advice? Be professional. Always. by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      And your point is???

      The parent poster didn't mention anything about strikes, walkouts, or unions. You took this as a reason to push the standard 'unions now, because management is inherently evil' shtick, which helps nobody, and weakens your position.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    9. Re:My advice? Be professional. Always. by the_ed_dawg · · Score: 1
      And you should find humor in the situation for your last two weeks. Where I work, we came up with ideas on how to handle our 8% pay cut:

      10. Use restroom more at work to save on toilet paper at home.

      9. Sign up for the company's "unlimited long distance plan."

      8. Safety glasses and window tint can make stylish sunglasses.

      7. ESD footwear is not just for work anymore.

      6. Eat all meals at work to take advantage of free break room condiments.

      5. 2216 adhesive makes an excellent replacement for your child's Elmer's glue.

      4. Collect old memos for burning during cold winter months.

      3. Develop agreements with co-workers to nominate each other for peer recognition awards.

      2. Thermal chambers can cook a mean pan of muffins!

      and #1...

      There ain't nothin' wrong with a blue conductive bathrobe.

      --
      There are two types of people: those prepared for the zombie apocalypse and those who will be eaten.
    10. Re:My advice? Be professional. Always. by rdewalt · · Score: 1

      Comments like this one make me wish there was a higher than 5 rating.

      I did this. To the letter. Seven years ago. I even PGP signed my resignation e-mail (Which I followed up with a printed version that I signed infront of the boss)

      Seven of us left the company two weeks later. Those two weeks were almost -chaos- in the company.

      We left. Founded our own company. We're still here. We survived the Dot Com Boom. We have quite a nice clientelle list, and we've had a nearly unheard of growth trend.

      Now, not saying that its going to happen this way for everyone. There was thankfully quite a good bit of handshaking, networking, and string pulling that kept us from taking the offers of all those investors. (And there were a -ton- of them, this was the height of DotComSwell) To this date, we have no shareholders demanding to us. We've been in the black since day 1, and we're almost alwyas actively hiring.

      Seven years ago, I left a cushy cubicle job, programming for an average corporate behemoth. I still have a cubicle, but its -my- cubicle. In more ways than a name plate.

  205. I'm afraid you may have to continue the fight by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    The relationship between employer and employee is harmonious:-

    they push,
    you resist.

  206. deep financial shit? by cornice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Suddenly, the company realizes its in deep financial shit? Sometimes asking for more is like trying to extract back taxes from the homeless. If someone is living fat at your expense then do something about it. If everyone is in the same boat then what will this prove? Whining while others are in the same pain will get you no sympathy and may cause people to seriously dislike you. When Indian programmers are loosing work to Russians I think your decision is much harder than you think.

    1. Re:deep financial shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Average Russian H1B is better educated than average Chinese, Korean, Indian and American workers combined.

  207. Point taken by smileyy · · Score: 1

    I'm sure my priorities will be different once I have kids. Yikes!

    --
    pooptruck
  208. As George Carlin once said by daBum · · Score: 1

    in one of his comedy bits about the English language, and the "beauty" of the word fuck(paraphrased from memory): It's the only word that is a noun, verb, adverb, and adjective all at the same time. This allows you to have sentences like: "Fuck the fucking fuckers."

    --
    I am dyslexia of borg - your ass will be laminated.
    1. Re:As George Carlin once said by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Welcome to my friend's list. :)

  209. Leave by JoePyro · · Score: 1

    I joined a startup where things with the boss (read, cash cow) went sour from early on. The job market here was pretty bad, and we pretty much started looking for new jobs. The first guy who got caught looking for a new job was fired. On paper it was for insubordination, but it was made pretty clear to the rest of us what happened.

    The rest of us were pretty pissed off, but we ended up not doing anything. The end result was that we pretty much left, one by one, and we all ended up being horribly bitter. It's still the only thing any of us can talk about when ever we run into each other.

    Get out. Start something yourselves. And above all else, if some daddy's-little-rich-bitch who can't figure out email attachments is starting a tech company (or a tiny bit of her money is being used as leverage to get the loan to start it) and wants to hire you, tell her to go fuck herself.

    It's a lot easier to dedicate the time and energy to searching for a job when you've got nothing else to do than when you're working 70 hours a week and miserable 24/7.

    --
    JoePyro "It's a joyless existence, being smushed" -Larry Wall
  210. Skip the drama? by anti-pirate · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to see you when you're feeling dramatic. Suck it up and go find a new job. The other members of the department should do the same. Disperse. It'll be better for all your careers and your (people) network will improve significantly.

  211. consult? by johnnyR · · Score: 0

    I'm hourly, so if I work 60-70 HOURS I get paid for it, guess what, I never work more than 40

    --
    The gun is good - Zardoz
  212. Worth it for me by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 1

    I did this (solo anyway) a couple of years ago. Got jerked around by an asshole VP one time too many, and said screw it. I decided to quit, slept like a baby that night, and put my 2 weeks notice in the next day. Took me almost a year to find another job that paid as well doing what I was good at, but it was still worth it. Be aware of the risks and costs, especially if you have a family to support. But don't ever let someone take advantage of you just because you are afraid of not being able to find a job.

  213. I was let go to but.. by havoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was let go too from a company whose new management was (still is) horrible. They had already laid off 15% of my department. I was so looking forward to being next. I really hated it there but didn't want to quit because it had been such a nice place the previous three years, I kept hoping it would get better. It never did. I continued to work my 41 hours a week (while others worked more to make up for the losses) and was finally let go. It was a very happy day indeed.

    I spent the next 6 months self training and relaxing. I would send out a couple of resumes a week. One day I received a call from an old friend from work who offered me a new job making more than I made at the last place with a much better work environment.

    Of course, I had plenty of savings, no debt (other than house) and was able to collect unemployment. If you are prepared, unemployment can be a very relaxing time.

  214. then just quit by oogoody · · Score: 1

    If you don't like your job then just quit.
    Don't make it a crusade. Let the other people
    live their lives and make their own decisions.
    Sounds like you just want stir up the shit
    for shit sake.

    BTW, if you rely on your job validation you are
    always at the mercy of others. If you are not
    appreciated who cares. If you don't like the
    hours work less and see if you get fired.

  215. You and everybody else... by sterno · · Score: 1

    This is somewhat of a lottery ticket mentality, that this great insight will come, and then you'll go make a bunch of money on it. Well, you might get lucky, but I'd suggest doing something a little more mundane. Look at the software that's out there, look at the needs of businesses out there and find something that people need that's not being provided. Custom development and systems integration are things that can provide a good solid job even if it's not always the sexiest work in the world.

    Also, even if you have this wonderful idea, it doesn't matter if:

    1) nobody else in the world wants it
    2) you have nobody capable of selling it

    Just remember that there are lots of people out there making good livings on pretty mundane ideas. If you can go out and write a software component that is useful to corporate developers, you can make good money on it. You sell the component for like $1000 which is a drop in the bucket to a big company, and give them a rather open license and source code. They help you fix your bugs, they are happy and you are happy. Sell a few hundred or a few thousand copies, and it becomes a rather lucrative business.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  216. That will work. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    For like 2 days. Then they'll just hire one of the millions that have been unemployed for more than a year at 8 bucks an hour and move on. Meanwhile, unless you have a job already lined up, you're going to have a hard time explaining: "I just left because I wasn't appreciated."

  217. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh. You must be Management.

  218. You got it all wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do what I did... I was getting the royal screw over at work... So, took advantage of our EAP program and got an appointment with a shrink... Told her I was so stressed, was not eating and made up some other stuff... Then bam, in just under an hour had the proper documentation to take short term mental leave (at full pay)... It was the best 16 weeks of company paid job searching I ever had....

    Got a better job, more money and a manager that actually listens to me...

    1. Re:You got it all wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea. Now if you ever apply for a job in the healthcare industry they'll check your records and find out that you are a nutcase.

  219. I tried this... by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    My old company was quickly swirling down the bowl. I and the rest of the coders were putting in bucketloads of OT and not getting paid for it (salaried). The owner felt that OT was "part of the job" and that if we couldn't "finish our daily tasks" in 8 hours, it was our fault we were putting in the OT.

    Over the course of the next year, everyone quit and went on to greener pastures. The owner, responded by hiring Chinese immigrants on a work sponsor visa. This locked them into a three year contract where they had to work for baseline crappy pay (min. wage). The tech department is now 100% Indentured Servants and if they try to look or go elsewhere the owner pulls the sponsorship and has INS ship them back home.

    Hope your situation turns out better.

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  220. Yep, and still here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, we had a great walk out meeting over six months ago. We're still here.

  221. Workers Rights... by isdfnmo · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the US, but here in the UK we have employmee contracts, employment law and tribunals to go to.

    My employment contract requires me to work 37.5 hours per week fulfilling the duties of my documented Job Specification, plus any other reasonable tasks when requested by my line management. If you refuse to do unreasonable tasks, and that includes working unreasonable hours with no over-time over a sustained period, and the company fires you, you are entitled to sue them for wrongful dismissal.

    Check it out, and Good Luck !!

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur
  222. One other point... by starcraftsicko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Instead, decide where your breaking point would be, and discuss it reasonably ("if this happens, I'd really have to leave, and neither of us wants that to happen"). You are NOT making threats. Make this clear. Explain that you will keep your manager informed as the situation evolves, and that you will not leave without warning.

    If you do draw the line for management and they step over it, you pretty much have to do what you said you would. This is a life lesson of sorts... if people believe that you won't make good on your promises, they will come to assume that you are full of s**t and should be treated as such.

    If you tell your employer "if I have to work more than 50 hours in a week I am not going to answer the pager/cell/phone if you put me on call this weekend", then make damn sure you do what you said you would.

    Worse case you get fired and collect unemployment... but no matter the outcome, you'll be taken seriously.

  223. Ha ha - at IBM you nearly work for free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Quote from Computer Weekly [www.computerweekly.com] regarding IBM UK's stuffing of employees (Thanks HR droids, we're proud of you!):

    • "Under the new pay regime, which came into force last month, stand-by rates for compensating staff for being on call during unsociable hours will be 2 [UK pounds] per hour - half the national minimum wage".

    Not agreeing to sign up for these attractive terms may well get you the sack. Guess who I (and many other colleagues) don't have a lot of time for these days! The Amicus MSF Union has gained a lot of new members recently...

  224. Tips for sanity by quark2universe · · Score: 1

    Get everyone in your group to do these things:

    1. Look for another job before leaving.

    2. Work 8 hours a day and then leave. If people line up at your door 15 minutes before you're schedule to leave, find something to do away from your office 30 minutes before you leave and go from there.

    3. When you get an oncall opportunity, deflect it to the next day. Most situations can wait, regardless of what any body tells you. If they say they are losing productivity because of a down system, they are going from 150% productivity to 140% because of all of the OT everyone is putting in.

    --

    Believe in things of which no person has ever learned
  225. Here are two stories to add... by estoll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know a company that was having similar problems. They built the moral of the employees and got them behind the company to work those 60 hour weeks. They even got employees to "loan" the company some of their paychecks. The result? Over half of the employees got laid off within 6 months. The "loans" were never paid back. And the employees are still working 60+ hour weeks. I'm not sure a walk-out is going to solve your problem. Start looking for another job...

    I also know of another company that again had, a similar problem. Instead of walking out, the core development team got together and started their own company. They sold their services to the company they left at a lower rate than it cost to employ them. The company they started has been around for 9 years now and is still growing.

    --
    http://www.askthevoid.com
  226. Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen. It sucks everywhere. And, thanks to nice companies like IBM, which are still bringing in h1b's and exporting jobs (ironically, to the country the majority of h1b's come from), in addition to all brain-dump-schmucks who came to IT in search of $$$ in the late 90's, makes this the worst economic climate ever.

    Simply, just slow down. It is much more effective to work together to slow down your progress, move back deadlines, work cohesively to slow down your production. Also, make it clear to upper management that 50-60 work weeks on a regular basis is more expensive, in terms of sick time / temps / shit morale, then hiring project oriented consultants to get over the 'hump'.

    But, here's the real deal. In 2000, The entire 2nd level support team (which I was member of), quit in protest of a new prick manager, who wanted us to work weekends to do trivial tasks, like cleaning storage closets, etc.

    2 years later: The prick still has a job. Everyone who quit found the economy quickly soured, and I am now making $10k less than at that job, with no benefits and mounting bills. And I'm luckier than some, because I am still in IT, but now I have to do shit work, because that's all there is. Shit, I used to manage the applications and builds for over 2000 machines spread over three companies in two offices, and now, I do moves/adds/changes.

    Don't be stupid. Keep your job. Don't let management walk all over you, but don't even think about quitting. And, if everyone else does, stay. Show management you're loyal.

    Its dog eat dog, more like god eat dog.

  227. Form a union by sita · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

  228. in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the last person i knew about who was trying to get unemployment was told that even though they qualified, the state didn't have enough money to pay all the claims, so she was tough luck Lucy...

  229. Get jobs first. by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    The last time we did that, we all took jobs with another company. Don't walk out with nothing else lined up unless you really expect to get another job right away, and remember, you will get lower salary offers if you do not have a job and are looking for a new one.

  230. Why work the OT ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what would happen if you didn't work the OT? The projects would be late, and that would reflect poorly on the management. Ultimately, it's their problem.

  231. Be smart, have a plan, be professional by nomadicGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First off, realize that no matter how good you think that you are or how much you think the company depends on you, they will just hire someone else to replace you and move on. It is a very rare case that a company just can't go on without a few people. You may inconvenience them for a while but that is about it. Life will go on.

    Secondly, don't leave without a plan. If you have plenty of savings and job prospects then go for it. It would be best to line up a new gig prior to leaving the old one though. If you don't have savings and alternatives then its time to buck up and deal with the current situation. If you haven't set aside some cash, kept your fixed expenses low, and networked like hell then you deserve to be stuck. Learn your lesson and make plans to leave your options open in the future. There is nothing worse than being stuck in a shit job because you can't afford to leave.

    Third, be professional. If you do leave just tell your boss that you have other opportunities that you want to pursue and give 2 weeks notice. Work hard and be pleasant for those two weeks. You will never regret acting professionally and you leave plenty of options open. You may want to work at this company again some day. You may want to use somebody as a reference. At the very least, you want people to think well of you after you leave. You never know where you will run into these people again. If you make an ass of yourself it could hurt you in the future.

    Four, I would leave on my own and not as a group. Why throw fuel on the fire. Nobody can fault you for leaving on your own to pursue something else. Leaving as a group implies that you are intentionally trying to hurt the company. Its up to you but I wouldn't do it.

    Last, be constructive and do things because they are what is best for you, not because you want to hurt somebody else.

  232. I have done this, and so have some friends of mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    At one job, we all hated our new boss so much that we were prepared to leave as a group. When his manager found out about it, they fired him and kept us. They needed us more than him.

    At another place, some friends of mine (most of the tech department) wanted to leave. They found a new place, got their manager hired there, and he brought the rest of them over. It worked very well.

    Don't let people tell you there are no jobs now and you have to hold onto a crappy one. If you're good, there are jobs.

  233. A genuine american company would... by jeanluc.bonnafoux · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    1) Hire a dozen of clever indian developers, they will cost the price of all the small US team,
    2) Fire the whole US team shouting too much,
    3) Money !
    Hey, guys, this *is* capitalism !

    --
    le souvenir d'une certaine image n'est que le regret d'un certain instant (M.Proust)
  234. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no "company", a single malevolent entity that is treating you like dirt. There are a lot of individuals involved in the decisions to ask more hours of you, put you on call w/o extra compensation, etc.. Right now, one of your managers is probably talking to his superior, saying "well, I guess we could ask W and X to handle those few extra on-call hours... it sure sucks, but they seem to be okay with the increases so far, and someone has to do it. That should keep customers Y and Z with us, so we'll be okay on payroll through this quarter, at least."

    This is bullshit. There very well is a company. It's the fictituous organization you're in that exists to benefit the guy on top. You're kept around as an employee because you earn that guy more money than you cost. If you cost more than you made him, then he would outsource you. It's as simple as that.

    Do you know that the average income in the 2000 census is $65,000 for the U.S.? That means that for every guy making $25,000, there's another making $105,000. And chances are, he's making that $105,000 by underpaying the $25,000 guy. That's capitalism.

    As soon as I figured that out, I started my own business. Today, a year later, I'm fairly successful. Made about $80,000 last year. It would have been more, but when I had to take on extra people to help out, I paid the consultants extremely well. (They usually scored 1/3rd of the contract amount.)

  235. Not all true. by /dev/trash · · Score: 2, Informative
    And, actually, if you don't have a job in 6 months then you also need to figure out what to do for health insurance - COBRA runs out at that point. Don't go uninsured, since any future insurer will then be able to point at "previously existing medical condition" to avoid paying for many things


    COBRA lasts 18 months.
    You should get a document from your previous insurer stating that you have been insured and that you can't be turned down for existing conditions.

    1. Re:Not all true. by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I'm Canadian, i don't quite understand American financial mechanisms and organisations...but i find it hard to believe that a "Terrorist Organisation bent on ruling the world" would be managing employment insurance!

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:Not all true. by RadioTV · · Score: 1

      And knowing is half the battle.

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
  236. few thoughts by Big+Bean · · Score: 1

    Was in a similar situation about a year ago. I was one for 4 team leaders that left a company together as a group for another company in the same industry. At the time we all felt that there was no way our current company could function well without us. We had all the knowledge and did most of the work (which was true) and that who ever they got to replace us would fail. Of course this wasn't true, sure it slowed them down for a bit having to let new people come up the learning curve, but they survived quite well.

    A few thoughts to consider for your situation:

    1) Why just quit? If you are going to quit you are going to need something new to do (start a new business, find a new job, win the lotto, etc) so why not work on this why you still have a job. In a sense build your new company or find a new job on your current employers dime. You'll get the same satisfaction for quitting later that you will now.

    2) Consider legal action that your employer might take. Just because they don't have solid ground for a winnable case doesn't mean they won't pursue it, especially if you start a business with your own funds. How much would a 50,000$ in lawyer fees hurt them vs. how much it would it hurt you. If they are already going under that might not matter too much.

    3) Consider how others in the company that are not part of the quitting group might react. I was very surprised how personally people took us leaving, even if it didn't really affect them in any way.

    4) Consider burned bridges. You might not care too much about bridges back to your employer, but think about the bridges fires they may start for you. Will you still have a reputation to stand on with other prospective employers/customers.

    5) Be sure of your co-quitters. Can you work with all of them if you did your own thing? All they people you can trust?

    6) When you quit follow through with it. How will you react to 30% raise to stay at your current job?

    Good luck to ya! If you are unhappy with your job and can find something better, Iâ(TM)d say go for it. I just wouldn't jump off a sinking ship until you have a new ship to land on.

  237. prepare for a roller-coaster ride... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...has IT starts to unionize:
    http://www.svbizink.com/headlines/artic le.asp?aid= 4549&iid=300

  238. Self Delusion by smack.addict · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Technologists are particularly prone to the delusion that the company cannot run without them. In truth, everyone in an organization is expendable. If you are not expendable, that really means you are doing a bad job and they are probably better off in the long term without you anyways.

    If you are unhappy where you work, execute a job search and leave when you have another job. In the mean time, work with your bosses to see if you cannot improve the situation. If you do work with them and improve it, you will be happy AND you will be more important. If it does not improve, at least you have ammunition when you are asked what steps you took before deciding to leave at an interview.

    Under no circumstances should you talk about leaving or hint that you are actively seeking another job. Their first hint should be your 2 weeks notice. Even if you think you are being nice, you really risk only creating suspicion.

    1. Re:Self Delusion by ewg · · Score: 1
      The delusion is exposed by a quick thought experiment: imagine yourself in a job interview saying,
      "I'd like to take this position, but it's clear from talking to everyone here that the previous guy was irreplaceable. You should probably try to get him back."
      --
      org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
    2. Re:Self Delusion by jasonzzz · · Score: 1


      Ha, as much as the fact that most employees have clear delusions on how important and indispensable they are. Managers are usually under a similar type of self delusion that you've described - the fact that all employees are completely replaceable widgets while simulataneously believing that the employee should be eternally grateful to have a job in the first place.

      Screw that.

      My entire and complete philosophy in employment is this: I really don't care if you think of me as expendable or indispensable. But I am going to make damn well sure that I always have a backup position. That way, I make the company and the managers the expendable part of my equation.

    3. Re:Self Delusion by burbilog · · Score: 1
      Technologists are particularly prone to the delusion that the company cannot run without them. In truth, everyone in an organization is expendable. If you are not expendable, that really means you are doing a bad job and they are probably better off in the long term without you anyways.

      In theory... in practice things differ sometimes. Once management in our company tried to remove head of IT department and head sysadmin on the grounds that they refused to install microsoft solution (actually some accounting crap working under ms sql written for small companies, not for big trade houses) instead of proven novell servers with fast btrieve databases. I was considering walking out too because the jerk hired instead of them knew nothing about unix and internet but demanded a lot of bullshit, others were grumbling.

      Well, the company (big company, about 500 people at that time) worked only one week. ONE. Then everything went into disorder. New guys did not know how to handle Definity (thus they could not even simply change internal phone numbers, yes, documentation was on the shelves in the same room), their microsoft solution was calculating some reports for hours where previous system was doing the same job in seconds, then they managed to crash backup server ("it's slow, something wrong with irq, we must fix it"), then the main server died. All backups were there, dat-40 on the shelf... company came to the screeching halt.

      In two days after that everyone were back, invaders kicked out and company owners learned a hard lesson: it would cost obscene money to replace existing system.

    4. Re:Self Delusion by smack.addict · · Score: 1
      Your complete lack of understanding of management will only cause you misery in the long run. I am sure there are managers who fit the characature you have stereotyped management with. I have met such managers--twice.

      Almost no one thinks like that. Unfortunately, since you labor under this false belief, you are doomed to treat management with contempt and suspicion, which ultimately will do nothing for your career.

  239. Re:Don't have a walkout party, have a resume party by ketamineX · · Score: 0

    Jeoooorb!

    You almost got it there. Try adding a few more Syllables or something....

    http://www.homestarrunner.com/cantsayjob.html

    -- Strong Bad

  240. Why a "mass exodus"? by mobiGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
    My question to you is: what is your purpose in leaving?

    If you are leaving because you are being exploited, then great; do what you would normally do when not happy: either leave now or find another job first and then resign.

    But what is the point of the mass exodus? Are you trying to hurt the company? If so, then I see that as a big problem.

    Are you trying to go off and start a new business with said folks? Then I suggest you take a measured approach: develop a business plan, get some contacts and/or contracts, possibly have a couple leave now to focus on the business while the remainders stay at the current (paying) jobs until there is stability in the new place.

    If you aren't trying to go somewhere else with the group, then I really don't see the point to the exodus.

    A bunch of posts here say "don't leave 'cause that'll look bad in an interview". I don't buy that at all myself. However, if you lead an exodus with no real (business) purpose then that WOULD look bad for sure.

    --

    ...Beware the IDEs of Microsoft...

  241. Wow. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    You've just described my life for the last 6 months.

    We've got a skilled and effecient tech department, and a lax and inefficent sales department. They bring in pretty much nothing. They've been blaming it on the economy since forever, but when 10 of the last 11 decent sales were brought in by techs, that story ceases to hold water.

    This is bad enough, but upper management listens to the sales idiots, and blame us for the lack of revenue! Like we can just magically make money if nothing is being sold.

    My division is one of the worst hit. Sales underbids programming contracts massively, in order to make the sale, and leaves us holding the bucket, forced to try and make things happen with no resources. And when we fail to pull it off, its OUR fault.

    The idiots bid a VB support contract for a legacy application, written in spagetti code by some lunatic, for a group of java, C, and PhP developers, and THEN refused to lay out for ANY development software. Normally I get annoyed with people who cry about having no development software, but VB? That crap depends on the tools. On top of that, we had a deadline so short it was stupid. It was a lose lose job.

    It's an ugly situation. We've all got resumes out, but it's not a great time to be looking, especially here. We've almost walked out a couple of times, but that whole, "No job" thing is worrisome.

    Sigh. Well, that was depressing.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  242. Why does Bush Hate America? by composer777 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I agree, it's amazing that people are voting for this guy after his sending troops off to war for ficticious reasons which will increase terrorism, driving the economy into a train-wreck, and increasing spending to Reaganite levels, which serves to cripple government to the point that the next guys coming in office won't be able fund social programs. They are spending this much on purpose, the goal is destroy all social programs while benefitting the rich. The next guys coming in won't have a choice but to raise taxes even more, and spend the money on "defense" (AKA gravy train for large corporations) which is bigger than the 2nd largest military 10 times over. All that money isn't spent on protecting us, folks.

    1. Re:Why does Bush Hate America? by cheezedawg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      sending troops off to war for ficticious reasons

      The reasons were not ficticious. Our justifications for going to war were actually quite independant of whether or not we find WMDs in Iraq.

      which will increase terrorism

      There is absolutely no way you can make that claim. In fact, from where I am sitting, the President has done a pretty good job at reducing terrorism- there has not been a substantial attack against us since 9/11.

      driving the economy into a train-wreck

      The economy was already a train wreck when President Bush took office. Not only that, but we have since found out that a lot of the economic success of the late 1990's was not even real (the Enron and Worldcom accounting scandals all date back into the 1990's).

      and increasing spending to Reaganite levels

      Total government spending in 2002 was 19.5% of the GDP, and that is substantially lower than many of the Clinton years (Clinton spent more than that through 1997- Source). The increase from 2001 to 2002 can mainly be attributed to the War on Terrorism.

      the goal is destroy all social programs while benefitting the rich.

      You might notice from the Budget document linked above that spending on Human Resources (Education, social services, health, medicare, social security) has increased under President Bush.

      And don't you get tired of the same old class warfare arguments?

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    2. Re:Why does Bush Hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "There is absolutely no way you can make that claim. In fact, from where I am sitting, the President has done a pretty good job at reducing terrorism- there has not been a substantial attack against us since 9/11."
      Dude, there was never a substantial attack against us before 9/11. The Bush admin. does a good job of patting themselves on the back for keeping us safer, but if they did nothing after 9/11 there still would not have been any attacks.

    3. Re:Why does Bush Hate America? by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      > Ask the people waiting on fresh drinking water....

      Funny how the oil pipelines flowed so quickly, but there is still no restored water supply in much of Baghdad.

    4. Re:Why does Bush Hate America? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that militia types (like the possibly apocryphal farmer with a rifle that took out a blackhawk) and some conscripts have been counted as civilians to beef up the total.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Why does Bush Hate America? by pyite · · Score: 1

      Uhm. Are you a moron? The World Trade Center was bombed. The federal building in Oklahoma was bombed. And plus, there's no control version of the United States to see what would happened if the Bush administration did nothing. Would you like to leave it up to chance that nothing happens?

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    6. Re:Why does Bush Hate America? by dhg · · Score: 1

      I think when someone specifically states that the reason we need to invade Iraq is because Saddam has weapons of mass destruction. Try going back and reading some headlines from the months leading up to the war. Granted, the reasons for going to Iraq did change over time: from regime change, to connections to Alqueda, to weapons of mass destruction. In any case, they were desparate to invade, and its no surprise that the reasons turn out to be trumped up. If you don't think what we've done in Iraq will increase and perpetuate terrorism, then you probably are completely devoid of any ability to think logically. As for the rest of your arguments, well when Warren Buffet comes out against Bush's tax cuts and says it unfairly benefits the wealthy, what do you say in response. Are you wealthy and trying to defend the policy? Finally, no I don't get tired of the same old class warfare arguments. If you care to do some research, the growing disparity between the wealthy and the poor, and the shrinking of the middle class are causes for real concern. This situation benefits nobody in the long run and actually harms America. This country was founded by people trying to escape the European monarchies. I don't get tired of any argument that has merit. Of course, if I were a republican trying to defend the president, I would probably offer up similar moronic babble.

    7. Re:Why does Bush Hate America? by cheezedawg · · Score: 1

      The justification for invading Iraq was to force compliance. Saddam was required by 17 unanimous UN resolutions to prove that he had disarmed, and he never did. Nobody disputes that- not even people like Mr Chirac or Mr Blix. If the goal had merely been disarmament, then another 12+ years of UN inspections might have even worked, but it would have worked at the cost of the continued torture and oppression of the Iraqi people, a continued threat to our national security, and it would give other crazy 3rd world despot leaders incentive to misbehave. Nothing short of full compliance was acceptable.

      Now if Saddam quietly destroyed all of his weapons in secret, especially in the face of such intense international pressure, then he is crazier (and stupider) than we all thought. He could have avoided 12 years of sanctions, repeated bombings, and a full-scale invasion if he had only showed the world proof. The world knew he had weapons- we even saw him use some of them. But instead he played the system for 12 years, so it was a very reasonable assumption that he still had the weapons. But the point is this- the world told him to do something and he didn't do it. Whether or not he still actually had WMDs (and I still think some will be found) is irrelevant.

      Now the reason for going into Iraq when we did was because of our 9/11 wake up call- we realized that we can't afford to have a sworn enemy of our country collecting illegal weapons. The fact that Saddam is sitting on huge natural resources that can finance almost anything he wants set Iraq apart from other rouge nations (ex: the DPRK- they can't afford squat).

      Were the WMD allegations trumped up? Maybe, but that seems very unlikely to me. Why would we lie about that when we knew that the truth would come out after our invasion? In fact, the truth is coming out because of the invasion.

      If you don't think what we've done in Iraq will increase and perpetuate terrorism, then you probably are completely devoid of any ability to think logically.

      Ah, I don't agree with you, therefore I am devoid of any ability to think logically. Thatâ(TM)s a pretty good debate tactic.

      I think that a stable and free Iraq, as well as a dedication to the mid-east peace process, will do wonders for our relations with that part of the world. These things will take time, but it looks like to me like progress is being made.

      As for the rest of your arguments, well when Warren Buffet comes out against Bush's tax cuts and says it unfairly benefits the wealthy, what do you say in response.

      Yes, Warren Buffet is against the tax cuts. Warren Buffet is also a regular contributor to the Democratic Party. He is entitled to his opinion, and I am entitled to disagree.

      The fact is, the wealthy already pay most of the taxes (the richest 50% pay over 96% of all income taxes- Source). It stands to reason that they will benefit more in a tax cut. I don't see anything wrong with that.

      If you care to do some research, the growing disparity between the wealthy and the poor, and the shrinking of the middle class are causes for real concern.

      Ok- here is some research. Let's look at the last substantial tax cut before this one- the tax cuts during President Reagan's administration. Under the Reagan administration, every income bracket showed an increase in real income, but families making under $50,000/year had a 5.9% increase compared to the 2.5% increase of families that made over $75,000/year. During this same period, the poorest quintile saw an increase of 6% in real income, and minorities had an 11% increase in income. And just today CNN ran a story that the number of millionaires is shrinking. So much for your "growing disparity" between the rich and the poor.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    8. Re:Why does Bush Hate America? by cheezedawg · · Score: 1

      President GWB has spent more money than any of the last 16 presidents in one fiscal year.

      Heh- the budget has increased every year with few exceptions for the past 100 years, so the same can be said about Clinton, Bush Sr, Reagon, Carter, etc. Your statement is meaningless.

      Lol Spending on Human Resources somehow equates Education, Social Services, Health, Medicare (btw these are all the same thing! lol), and Social Security? I guess making shit up is good.

      All I can say is, read the budget report that I linked to, because its pretty obvious you didn't.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
  243. There is no greater fool by TerryAtWork · · Score: 1

    Than one who quits a job without having another one lined up first.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  244. Lawsuit! by starcraftsicko · · Score: 1

    You can bet if I quit in those sort of circumstances, I'd be suing

    Spoken like a true American!

    Seriously though, you can't expect management to be telepathic... to sense your displeasure and its causes. If you quit without first communicating your concerns to management, I'd say your lawsuit would be a waste of time.

    Sure management should already know what the problem is, but that is because you should have already told them.

    Don't expect much sympathy from the legal system if you are part of the problem.

  245. tech doesn't change anything by spiffy_guy · · Score: 1

    I think this is still called a strike. Sounds like you are forming a Union. Nothing new here, factory workers and dock workers and all kinds of people have been doing this for a long time.

    --
    Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human.
  246. How to handle it. by stephenbooth · · Score: 1
    Q: So, why did you leave your last position?

    A: The company hit a very rough time and it became apparent that there was little or no hope of a recovery. I felt it better to leave when I did than to stick it out to the bitter end.


    Remember we're talking here about a situation where a large proportion of the income generating part of the company (I often wonder why sales people aren't listed as cost centre) are leaving at the same time. The odds are that that company is going to die fast and hard, anyone who stays on board is going to be dragged down with it. There's no shame or bad rep in taking to the life boats when the ship is sinking.

    On the more general point of loyalty, that a few other people have mentioned. I'm prepared to be as loyal to my employer as they are to me. If they're good to me when times are good then I'll be good to them when times are bad. If they (to take an example from one of my previous employers, a certain multinational services and software group) claim there's no money available to pay employee bonuses in April but then give all managers a big bonus in June then they've just shot any chance of loyalty from me. And to take anohter example, if I'm doing a job then I expect a remuneration package comensurate to that post. If I'm temporarily covering a post whilst they recruit someone and am told that I don't have the relevant skill set to fill that post permanently so cannot apply, then I don't expect to have to train the person they do hire who is on a higher salary than me. In both cases I left the comapany shortly after the events.

    Stephen

    --
    "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
  247. Cut the foreplay and just quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit if you hate it. Or find another job. In either case, quit bitching that you have to, God forbid, work overtime.

  248. If he lives in New York City... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... or west coast, then six figures is about like 50K in the rest of the country when you consider cost of living expenses.

  249. One good idea by msuzio · · Score: 1

    If things suck this bad, I would take this path (and I have... trust me, for 3 months last year when my whole group was in danger of getting fired, we went through Hell together):

    - Keep working, but slow it down. Do what you *have* to do, but plan on making your exit and divorce any emotional connections you have to your work. Conserve energy for *you*. THis applies to your personal life too... make the most of any time you are not at work, and leave work issues *there*.

    - Work on your resumes. Critique each others resumes. Get everyone working part-time on calling recruiters, etc. Use each other as references/referrals on these things, it helps.

    - Work on your bankable skills. Refresh stuff you knew once, but haven't done in years. Pool money to buy up books on the latest and greatest trends, and cram! You're going to be out in the market, you need to be sharp!

    - Have training sessions. Seriously, we did this. We reserved meeting rooms with whiteboards and trained each other for 1-2 hour sessions on stuff some of us knew solidly. I taught many of my co-workers J2EE over a couple lunch sessions; others taught CORBA programming, Unix essentials, etc. You can even do these over your lunch hours and not feel at all like you're 'cheating' the company... it's your time, you are just taking advantage of some of the facilities that aren't being used anyway :-).

    There is a lot you can do. Working on business plan ideas is good too, although that is *so* difficult, the better course of action is to seek an 'investor' who already *has* an idea and just needs people to make it happen. They are definately out there, consult with local business groups to put out feelers on that.

  250. Wow, is Slashdot slow? by humphrm · · Score: 1

    This article which, based on the discussion content was clearly authored in 1999, only just now got posted on /. What happened?

    --
    -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
  251. Start protesting by aliens · · Score: 1

    Stop handing in your TPS reports.

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
    1. Re:Start protesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally somebody with the right idea.
      To properly walk out on the company, you must first look to the fountain of wisdom that is Office Space.

      You could take the...

      Peter route: Find some way to slowly take money from the company ,i.e. Superman 3. The end up switching jobs to manual labor.

      Samir, Michael route: Leave the company and end up working for a similar company that pushes you around in the same way.

      Joanna route: Flip off your boss and everyone in the place and go somewhere where they don't make you have (or display) flair.

      Or lastly,

      Milton route: Set the building on fire.

      Hope this helps in your decision

    2. Re:Start protesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was lucky. I got out of IT completely before I could become Milton because of all my years in IT, I never saw a person that was IT for a long time (15+ years) that DIDN'T become Milton. Sad, really. I knew one guy that even looked like him. Instead of a red stapler, he had a blanket.

  252. All critical data one one laptop? by rev063 · · Score: 1

    No wonder that company failed. When they have a policy of keeping all the critical data on one laptop, without backups, you gotta worry. Let alone being fired, what would have happend if your laptop was stolen or died?

    1. Re:All critical data one one laptop? by ecalkin · · Score: 1

      it's not policy, it's low budget. if the company in question had a plan and a clue they wouldn't have had this problem in the first place.

      it's amazing how many businesses are running around without a safety net in soooo many critical areas of their computer activities.

      eric

    2. Re:All critical data one one laptop? by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      It's more common than you think. When was the last time your boss backed up his/her personal data?
      (I'm talking about the suits)

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  253. Crapshoot by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I missed a similar situation by mere weeks. I left the company for a better job offer, but I was privy to the scheme before I left.

    Weeks later, three core people left, started their own consulting firm, and contracted with the employer to do their old jobs on a consulting basis! They somehow sold managment on the idea that it would be cheaper for the company to pay them as consultants than the pay them as employees. The consulting business has blossomed with new clients, and the old employer is in a well-publicized chapter 11.

    These guys won, and are still doing well, but this started in late 1998-early 1999 at the height of the bubble. They managed to create solid customer releationships that they have built a solid business on.

    Look before you leap, and make sure you know where you are going to land.

    --
    I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  254. Loyalty isn't overrated. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    It's just usually one sided.
    I'm working in a fricking sinking ship right now. Have been for a while. If I get a decent offer, I'm gone tomorrow.

    The thing is, I am the kind of person who really commits to a job. It takes a lot to push me to the point where I'm sitting right now.

    The amount of treacherous, underhanded, unpleasant, dishonest shit that's come down the pipe lately...I'll be happy to leave them in the lurch. Thank god I didn't sign a non-compete.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  255. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by jridley · · Score: 1

    Do you know that the average income in the 2000 census is $65,000 for the U.S.? That means that for every guy making $25,000, there's another making $105,000. And chances are, he's making that $105,000 by underpaying the $25,000 guy. That's capitalism.

    Actually, it's more like, for every 100 guys making $25,000, there's one guy making $4,000,000 by underpaying those 100 guys.

  256. Me too... by Zo0ok · · Score: 1

    I've got the same advice as everybody else, but the fact that many people actually tell the same story is also valuable.

    Of course share your thoughts with your boss...

    I (we) spoke twice to the same boss (on different occations, for different reasons), telling him that I had a problem with something. Both times I did intend to quit if a reasonable solution was not found - this was clear and honest. Both times we found a good solutions. The relationsship to my boss was not at all getting worse from this.

    In conclusion: be follow the golden rule, and be honest
    1) Tell them you are unsatisfied - they deserve to know.
    2) Do not threaten them with anything you cant or do not intend to actually do.

  257. Another thing: DON'T go in after this happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many moons ago (pre-Bubble), when I was fairly in need of work, I went to Aquent (then known as MacTemps).

    They pimped me out here and there, but my worst experience was working as a bench/field tech at a computer sales/service place in New Jersey, just after the entire service department walked out after the department head had a falling out with the owner.

    I worked there for a month, and they were in complete panic mode. It was a mess, nobody had any idea what was going on. Just about every other day I had to deal with customers irate over one thing or another that I had nothing to do with except for being the nearest target.

    Also, after a little while there I came to see the ex-employees' point: the owner well and truly WAS a right bastard, and a cheap SOB, too. He treated everyone like slaves, but he and his trophy wife who also "worked" there were seldom around-- too busy tooling around in their his and hers Mercedes. Most of the time when we needed an answer to something that onoly he could provide, he was nowhere to be found.

    The owner and the new service department head liked my work (read: my ability to tolerate abuse from customers) and wanted to hire me, but the owner wanted do so in a way that they would weasel out of having to pay the buyout fee to MacTemps. I flatly refused, not wanting to bite the hand that fed me, and because I really did not want to continue working in that environment-- regardless of how badly I needed the money.

    I left, and shortly thereafter got a really great temp gig that led to full-time employment.

  258. that's not quite true. by No-op · · Score: 5, Informative

    Specific sorts of professionals are exempt, and management is exempt. There's a special stipulation with regards to computer professionals, but it mandates that you must either be in management, or making more than $27.63 an hour (from the last time I looked at the regs).

    So, if you're making in excess of $57k/year, and the majority of your work is self directed (or you are in management) then you're somewhat screwed.

    State labor laws are also important here- State law cannot weaken the federal law ( if your employer falls under it) but it can make it stronger with more requirements. Check with your State wages and dues/labor/workforce department. They will also come in and investigate if you so desire, and can mandate that employers pay up to 2 years of back wages if they are found to have you wrongfully exempted.

    have fun. it's never easy.

    --
    EOM
    1. Re:that's not quite true. by Matrix272 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Technically (and you WILL NEED to get technical), IT professionals with salaries are exempt. The $27.63 per hour only comes into effect if the person is paid hourly. HOWEVER, there's still hope. The company you work for must have employees engaged in commerce (sale of goods or services) and had gross sales volume of over $500,000 in order for the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to apply.

      Second, your primary duty (assuming you're an IT person), must be:

      The application of systems analysis techniques and procedures, including consulting with users, to determine hardware, software, or system functional specifications)

      The design, development, documentation, analysis, creating, testing, or modification of computer systems or programs, including prototypes, based on and related to user or system design specifications.

      The design, documentation, testing, creating, or modification of computer programs related to machine operating systems.

      A combination of duties described above.

      For those of you who are wondering, that basically means System Analysts, Software Engineer, or Programmer. It does NOT include telephone technical support or a "senior network administrator / project manager (see this article on pages 4 and 9... sorry, no direct link to the opinion letter, although if you get a copy of it, let me know).

      To fit the Computer Exemption, secondary duties can NOT take up more than 20% (or 40% for "service establishments") of your time. For the Management Exemption, you must supervise at least 2 employees, have the authority to hire or fire people (or make recommendations that carry weight), and not spend more than 20% or 40% (see above) of your time on secondary duties.


      I was burned by my last employer, and I'm looking to get him back... so I've done lots of homework about this kind of thing. If you're interested in any of the documents I have, or have anything to offer, my e-mail address is netadm2000@hotmail.com.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
  259. Common Sense 101 by SilentMajority · · Score: 1

    DISCLAIMER: I'm not a lawyer and my comments are for entertainment purposes only. Following any of my advice or acting on my comments can lead to loss of employment, litigation, loss of sexual prowess and proof that you cannot think for yourself. Any such proof can lead to your confinement to a couch where you'll be compelled to watch propaganda and opinions disguised as factual news.

    1. Get a job offer in writing before you even consider hinting to anyone else at work that you are leaving.

    2. Encouraging others to leave their jobs can potentially lead to a lawsuit from your employer and possibly even those who meet with long-term unemployment due to your advice/encouragement.

    3. Perform this test: put your finger in a glass of water and then quickly pull it out. You are as indispensable to the company as the hole that filled up unless your departure directly causes a bankruptcy.

    4. Your actions might punish the wrong people. If you and your buddies leave, other remaining employees who may have had nothing to do with your frustrations could suffer a LOT more than the person/people you are targetting (assuming you're not trying to hurt the feelings of a company because that would be stupid--removing or changing the behavior of specific people would be smarter).

    5. If you are bringing down the morale of other employees by whining constantly instead of actively trying to fix the problems you dislike, then you should be fired. Go ahead and quit, the company will be better off without you.

    Some alternatives to quitting:

    Adhoc overtime: "No, I have prior commitments so I cannot stay tonight. If you want, I can come in very early tomorrow/Monday morning to meet with you and get a jump start. Is 6am OK? No? OK 9am it is then." Come up with every plausible reason to chat with or involve the person responsible for making up the stupid deadline during off hours and portray them of not being good team players if they start to complain. Show sincere interest in how they come up with deliverables and deadlines--expose them if they are pulling things out of their ass.

    Feeling appreciated: isn't in your employment agreement and probably not even mentioned when they offered you your job. Grow up and stop craving it at work. How YOU feel inside is up to you and not others. But you should leverage your accomplishments to go after things others can give you like well-deserved salary raises, bonuses, written recognitions/praise you can file away for later use, etc. These are worth a lot more than a cheesy pat on the back that compells an emotion you can produce on your own.

    Unreasonable deadlines: "I'm sorry but I can't finish that on time without changing the deliverables or schedule and I don't know anyone else who can. Since I'm well-above average in productivity, lets find out how exactly the person who came up with the plan determined that this timeline is feasible. Either he knows something we don't or we need to improve the way deadlines are being determined or hire more resources."

    Constant overtime: is a sign of mismanagement. Find out if laws in your state require your employer to compensate you. You'd be surprised. Document every minute you work overtime as well as what you produce. This can come in handy later.

    Above all: SHOW MANAGEMENT THAT CHANGES WILL INCREASE REVENUES OR REDUCE COSTS WITHOUT INCURRING RISKS. They'll listen if you use language they understand to offer specific solutions to the root causes of the frustrations you are experiencing.

  260. mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "unemployment" means "not employed", not collecting any kind of insurance. How the parent post got marked informative is beyond me.

  261. Well if your country or ideology... by iamacat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... makes you work 50-60 hour weeks and generally treats you like dirt, you should also gather the best minds and organize a mass expodus. Loyalty is good, undeserved loyalty is stupid. Consider that it doesn't have to be based on self-interest, just appreciation of whatever/whoever you are loyal to and there is no need for exceptions.

  262. i did it, and so could you! by mikek2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although I can't address an en-masse departure, I recently left my job and couldn't be happier with how it ended up. You could do it, too.

    My situation was similar to what the poster described- company tanking, workhours skyrocketing, and managers' heads migrating up their asses as unstoppably as tectonic motion. Even with all that, the decision to leave was TOUGH, especially "with the current job market." (everyone's favorite buzzphrase)

    I'll spare the drama, but suffice it to say the camel's back finally broke and I simply packed up my shit and walked out. It was weird, almost surreal, but despite the enormous risk I intuitively knew I couldn't spend another day under that employer's stunning incompetence. And it's not even that I'm some young kid with no obligations. I'm mid-30ish, was right in the middle of buying a house, had a dog, yada yada...

    So I left, and couldn't have been happier with how it turned out. After 'just' 2 rather unsettling months, I was picked up by another company: better pay, better people, reasonable hours, and actaully making a profit. I attribute my relatively quick pickup partly to dumb luck, but also (IMHO) a great education and experience.

    Vital: for everyone that says education doesn't matter, think again. Paper opens doors. Get those degrees AND be able to show you have more than book smarts.

    Moral of the story: it's tough to leave, but *absolutely* possible to land on your feet, even better than before. But it takes balls; the safe bet is always with staying with the status quo.

  263. The answer is UNION by praedor · · Score: 1

    Sheesh. This is precisely the point of labor unions that too many here seem to hold such low regard for...or worse, state that they are no longer relevant or needed. Bullshit!


    Worker exploitation (in the form of demanding long, nasty hours, poor compensation, no job security, etc) is precisely why unions are STILL needed every bit as much as they used to. Temp workers should unionize. Tech workers should unionize. This gives you exactly what the scenario depicts. Your department is getting screwed, you are getting screwed, so you collectively walk off the job to force reason back into the heads of management. You are just better protected by unions under the walk-out scenario, etc, than by just a collective bunch of yahoos deciding to leave. The latter has a higher chance of blowing up in your face while the former provides you more leverage and some protection from loss-of-pay during the walk-out (clue train note: this is called a "strick" and it is classic union tactic that frickin' WORKS).

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  264. Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They treat you like sh*t. That's not good. But it's no reason start some sort of peasant revolt.
    The the thing to do is to go out on your own and line up a new job and then simply quit to take this new and better opportunity. No whining, no negativity, no stigma.

    Sometimes rancor is unavoidable but purposely conspiring with other employees to deal some sort of a death blow to your employer is beyond the pale. Notwithstanding all the bullsh*t you have put up with you do owe the company that you are working for some duty of loyalty. That doesn't mean you aren't free to find a better situation. It _does_ mean that sitting around the company facility on company time plotting its downfall is simply wrong.

    Even if you don't think it's wrong exercise some machiavellian discretion. Do you really want to be known as a sh*t disturber and rabble rouser?

    I personally stay well away from all the hand wringers and malcontents at work. If there is bullsh*t going on I can see it on my own without listening to their whining. If the problem looks like its not going to go away or perhaps even get worse I can take quiet steps to find a new job. What I am not going to do is take the whole crew into my confidence and perhaps end up getting axed when the whole thing blows up before I have set up a new gig.

  265. Do it! run! go now! by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

    Quit now! make a really big deal out of it, scream and cry and yell and bitch and moan! make a big jerry maguire-esqe scene and yell "who's coming with me?!" as you're escorted to the door.
    From there, I suggest you go to ask.slashdot.org (while you can still afford to pay your ISP) and ask "How do I find a job in IT even though demand is so low?"

    Short answer: quitcherbitchin. You've got a job, be thankful.

    Medium sized answer: If you want to organize your co-workers to do something productive, You've got better odds at starting a circle jerk. Pulling a giant walk out isn't going to accomplish anything more than making you feel good about yourself for a week or so. After that, you're going to come to the quick realization that your skills, no matter how good you may think they are, aren't in demand. The IT market is horrid, and odds are you'll end up working in a shop that's just as bad, for less money. Be prepared to lose out on jobs to people that have double your education, triple your experience, and are willing to work for 10k a year less than you.

    (would you like to look at the stack or job applications I've got? We've bachelors, masters, and a handful of PhD's who want an $8.60/hr p/t lab job.)

    Grab a newspaper, bulk print your resume, start looking hard, and give your two weeks notice like the rest of the world. The credits will not roll and you will not live happily ever after by staging a walkout.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:Do it! run! go now! by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Mostly I agree. Depends on the particular segment of the IT market, though.

      We have a department that's considering the same thing, and in our case the department used to be an entire company. If we walked together, we'd walk across the street to the company that would be our major (only?) competitor if they had the people to do so (i.e. us).

      In other words, my team could walk en masse, and be hired en masse which makes it more viable. In fact, quitting in a group increases the odds of employment, since there may well be a company out there thinking of expanding into a new area--yours. If the staff present themselves, they might start it up.

      Of course as I said, it depends on what part of IT you work in. I'm in a segment that's actually growing right now, which puts me in a tiny minority.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  266. Haha... That's pretty funny... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    The same can be said about geeks. I belong to a few mailing lists that have general discussions about Linux and you would be surprised at how naive a number of PhD carrying people there are on the list.

    A few knew nothing about depreciating the value of a capital expense over the course of a few years. One was thinking about buying a lower end laptop to save some money for his small consulting firm, when he really should have talked to his accountant about depreciating the cost and saving money over the long-haul with taxes.

    Several others knew nothing about the ways that businesses make decisions and that it isn't always about what might be right or could 'possibly' lead to 'potential' revenue. Sometimes business decisions are made for the longterm viability of a corporation, even if that decision appears, on the surface, to just be something to piss everyone off.

    The problem with some professional managers with business degrees is that they might now really know when they are outside of their element. They might not know when they should let a department head and his/her team make a decision. Sometimes those things work out, sometimes they don't.

    However, if you ignore the skills that someone could bring to a company simply because they "know nothing" since they have a business management degree then you would only be hurting your company, since you wouldn't have the knowledge of which business decisions have worked in the past, work only in theory and are known to work like gangbusters.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Haha... That's pretty funny... by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      i agree, and for what it's worth, wrote this from the perspective of a non-technical manager (i'm what you might call a wannabe geek), who doesn't have a management degree. so i'm cracking on 'formally taught' people from the perspective (and recent experience) of them being non-functional, or book-oriented managers.

      i especially agree with your assertion that people are underused, due to preconceived notions of 'types' of workers. i like to think that i deploy the right person for the job, regardless of his or her background/orientation (although that usually does dictate deployment).

  267. Re:The answer is UNION...Doh! by praedor · · Score: 1

    Spelling correction:
    (clue train note: this is called a "strick" and it is classic union tactic that frickin' WORKS). should be (clue train note: this is called a "strike" and it is classic union tactic that frickin' WORKS).

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  268. FYI, in the welfare state of Sweden by Zo0ok · · Score: 1

    Just for funny info for you Americans...

    In Sweden, if you have a regular employment, neither you nor your employer can cancel it quicker than in three (3) months. It would actually be illegal to employ someone on other premises. Cool, isnt it?

  269. Found your own consulting company by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    then talk to the management to set up a support deal. This is an opportunity, not a problem...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  270. And then you can sing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you can all sing together:

    My nine to fives are over, I'll be a ramblin' rover
    Contentment be my wages and delight my tax and tithe
    And my heart will mind the ledger, no more the hours by measure
    And to rise and greet the morning, come what may I will be blithe
    --
    My Nine to Fives Are Over
    (Charlie Cares, © 2000)

  271. Been there, done that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in the same boat. Loved my job an the people I work with were great in my group. Then they hired VP who was just an ass. Small tech company with boxed software 100 people.

    Results:
    -Company lost it's entire quarterly profit.
    -We were all highly satisfied.
    -I went on to better things.
    -The company folded 2 years later.
    -Felt even more justified.
    -Wound up getting hired years later by my replacement and got some respect for knowing when to quit.
    -I'd do it all over again.

  272. Amen to that, bro by apankrat · · Score: 1

    100% agree

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  273. How about rent or a mortgage? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since most people these days save nothing and live paycheck to paycheck, self-respect comes in a distant second behind money.

    You can go an flip burgers, but that won't pay your $1,200 mortgage payment.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:How about rent or a mortgage? by corvi42 · · Score: 1
      Since most people these days save nothing and live paycheck to paycheck, self-respect comes in a distant second behind money.


      You can go an flip burgers, but that won't pay your $1,200 mortgage payment.


      Sure, but its still a choice that you make. Don't pretend that you have to put up with crap - you just have to take into account what's at stake - maybe your mortgage is at stake. How much is that worth to you? I'm not saying you have to just say "F-off you bastards, I'm quitting". I'm just saying that you're going to make a dollars-and-cents appraisal of what your self-respect is worth in any case, either consciously or not, and its probably better if you do it consciously than let your unconscious fears drive you to doing something that you might regret later. There's always a choice, some are worth making and others not. That's all.

      --

      There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
    2. Re:How about rent or a mortgage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to go out on a limb here, and assume the majority of the people posting here are employed in high tech.

      Yes, we have to pay mortgages or rent. But did any of us not see the bubble burst coming? Most of the companies that are so terrible they'd warrant a walkout have had multiple rounds of layoffs recently. Most of us know exactly how long we could survive if we lost their jobs. When I did the math a year or two ago, I didn't like the numbers, so I changed them (saved more, cut expenditures, liquified assets, prioritized quality of life, etc.) Most of my coworkers had done the same thing. So, when the company was continuing to treat us poorly, we tried to negotiate, we tried to resolve issues with management HR, etc. This got our department, as a whole, branded squeeky wheels. The terms we'd negotiated lasted for 4 months while the company did a risk analysis of down time in training new people and how much they thought they could mess with their existing employees. After that, "the company" (our CEO and Senior VP staff) rescinded all offers we'd negotiated directly with them, demaded we work 60 hours with no compensation, started to peel back our benefits, and told us if we continued to complain, we'd be in the next laid off round, and "since we all know what the economy looks like, you wouldn't want that". The company hadn't taken 2 years of lowered morale and increased savings into account. We, along with other departments, took the layoff instead.

      The systems we maintained were down within 3 weeks, despite our attempts to train the remaining people. The stock price went up short term due to the "decreased operating expenses", and we've now made a tidy sum on our options before the stock tanks again. Our immediate supervisor was among those who took the layoff, and we can still use him as a reference. The head of HR was against the lay-off decision (made by the CEO and Senior VP's) and will still give us good references.

      We get to live the rest of our lives knowing that we went out in a group, didn't sacrifice our principles, didn't cause the company or our former coworkers harm above the inevitable, and that we chose our self respect and the kind of life we wanted. Work is what you do to finance your real life. If we weren't paid for it, and didn't want to do anything outside of "the office", then we wouldn't be upset over increased hours and reduced compensation. If our families and home lives are that important, it's worth getting a plan together to provide for them while giving your employer the finger. Your job may be a career, it may be a life calling, but its still just a job, and you can always do it somewhere else.

      Unless of course you're a punch card operator or Ada programmer. Then you're screwed.

  274. I pulled a twist- by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    I changed careers.

    I walked out of an OSHA/EPA type job after 8 years. Typical issues, corruption, bribery, etc.

    Best move I ever did.

    So on the next day I tried to decide what I wanted to do. I realized I wasn't really qualified to do anything else (my whole professional career revolved around EPA type work) so I looked into doing something I *wanted* to do.

    So I goofed off for a year, did odd jobs to pay the bills, sold some old stuff, etc, and landed a job doing what I really wanted to do, and 4 years later I am much happier for it.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  275. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is an interesting theory, and in some cases, where management is intelligent, it can work. In those situations where management is interested in communicating, they engage the employees by telling them in advance why they are in a short term crisis, why and how it will be solved, so that it doesn't appear to be crap falling on them from the sky.

    I have personally been through a situation where I was "management", hired to modernize an engineering organization, but did not wield "executive" power, and disagreed with the "executive" decision to (illegally) overwork the staff. I left after stating my reasons before it went to hell. I was told "this is the way our industry works", and advised that If I wasn't willing to do 80 hours a week, I didn't belong.

    After I departed, the "management" left knew that they would have a high attrition rate, and they cajoled (but you signed the loyalty oath), threatened (you'll never work in this industry again, and you know we can make that stick), and bribed (look at the bonus!) the employees to stay to the end of the project...Then, as the project neared completion, and before they bribes were contractually due to be paid they started firing the people who had gone through hell, and pressured others to leave by obliquely letting them know they were next.

    And before you say "yeah, but this was probably a bunch of losers who made a crappy product, so they were fired for failing", this was the #1 selling product for the top company in a very prominent (one of the few growing in tech nowadays) industry upon release.

    The moral of this story is that there is no "one size fits all" answer. Sometimes (often) management would just as likely to tell you "You're fired" for communicating on them, so when you find the exception, nurture it and enjoy it while it lasts.

  276. We recently saw this happen by anomaly · · Score: 1

    We've recently consolidated operational components from different parts of our business. This meant relocation of facilities and staff to the HQ area (about 800 miles away.)

    The staff in the area to be relocated decided that the parent company couldn't live without their services during the transition and played the following game:
    1. We'll move.
    2. We won't move, but we will provide excellent documenation and help transition to the folks at HQ.
    3. We won't provide any docs.
    4. We're quitting now before the transition, but our services are available on a per-hour basis at a rate of 5x our current salaries.

    Management felt that they had been deceived and that the team was jerking them around. As a result management decided to tell the team to take a long walk off a short pier.

    The HQ team has had to scramble to try to understand the infrastructure and architecture at the remote location, but all in all the transition has gone fairly well.

    It surely could have gone more smoothly with the assistance of the remote team, but they made their bed.

    I believe it was DeGalle who said something to the effect of "The graveyards are full of indespensible men."

    Food for thought. Don't let them exploit you, don't exploit them. Look for a positive resolution to the problems.

    You might get screwed, but at least it won't hurt when you look in the mirror while shaving. You've got to live with the choices that you make.

    Respectfully,
    Anomaly

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
  277. Lawsuit by sebmol · · Score: 1

    You get sued for breach of your employment contract. That's what happens. Do you really think a company will just let you walk out and ignore it? Their loss of profits because of your lack of productivity is something they can sue you for in court. The only way around this is a unionized strike. You as a worker on your own have no right to strike.

    P.S. The jurisdiction here is Germany where no employment happens without a contract. The lack thereof was quite an adjustment when I came to the US.

    --
    "Light is faster than sound." - "Is that why people tend to look bright until you hear them speak?"
    1. Re:Lawsuit by brlancer · · Score: 1
      You get sued for breach of your employment contract. That's what happens. Do you really think a company will just let you walk out and ignore it? Their loss of profits because of your lack of productivity is something they can sue you for in court.

      The problem that most people in the US face is that there is no employment contract. Unless you're unionized, you are likely an "at-will" employee--either the employee or the employer can terminate the "contract" at-will and without cause.

      You as a worker on your own have no right to strike.

      Kinda. An individual can "strike", but without union protection you'll just be fired and replaced. The worst that can happen, tho, is being fired.

      This discussion is interesting because I see a great amount of abuse of "tech" employees because they tend to be young and removed from the classic "blue collar" mentality; these kids don't view unions and strikes as a good thing, so they just sit back and take it because they are "thankful" for just having a job.

      Employers and employees should be in a symbiotic relationship, not parasitic; unfortunately, larger companies usually act as a parasite while claiming that the employee is doing so. What can be done on a large scale to unionize "tech"/professional jobs?

      --
      Someone asked if I had patched against MSBlast; I said yes, I installed Linux.
  278. Loyalty to individuals vs. to corporations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    An article (Time? Economist?) many years ago wrote that in Silicon Valley there's more loyalty amongst employees to each other than to their corporations.

    They observed that often working-relationships outlived failed companies, and that groups of people would continue to come together again to work with each other in the future.

    Their conclusions -- great loyalty, but to peers.

    The JBoss case looks the same... great loyalty to Dain less to JB Grp.

  279. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are right: that's the way to go about solving problems in the workplace. Getting results that way might not be so easy. I have some experience along those lines.

    Managers have to juggle constantly to satisfy a number of stakeholders: the board, the shareholders, the customers, and the employees. It's no coincidence that I list employees last; sadly in these times the employees often get the short end of the deal. Not because management is unfeeling or because they don't care about employees, but it is felt that the employees can be pushed the most without breaking. Piss a client off and he'll take his business elsewhere. Disappoint the stockholders and they'll dump the stock or ask all sorts of nasty questions at the Stockholders' Meeting. But piss of your employees and they'll just keep going. Sure they'll grumble, but they won't quit on you unless you really go too far.

    Also, some managers do not like you to bring them trouble. Oh they like feedback and all, but if you're the only one to come to them to "Find out what the problems of the company are, and talk about how the company is dealing with them", they might label you as "the troublesome one". You may even find that ephitet duly noted in your personnel file (oh yes...) Instead of just doing your work, you come to them to tell them how to do their work, with a bunch of issues that frankly are a big headache. Well, that depends on your boss, and how you approach him. Still, the easiest (and therefor the most common) reply would be "Just do your job like everyone else".

    Getting no results from your boss, you decide to see his boss. Your problems already start even before you enter his door. For one, your boss will probably be pissed for going over his head. Managers don't like it when their people speak with their supervisors. Second, your manager's boss will already be on a personal level with your manager. He probably works intensively with him on a day-to-day basis, whereas you are just an entry on the budget sheets. If your manager has reported that everything's fine, he might think you're exaggerating and wasting his time. Then again, if you keep running into a blank wall like this, you could consider switching departments rather than quitting.

    I do realise I paint a bleak picture here. Sure, there are good companies with good management, but my guess is that the people considering to quit en masse are not working for one of them.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  280. It's called an "union" by Faeton · · Score: 1
    I take it that I'm in the minority here, belonging to a union. I work at a nuclear power plant.

    Some might call unions "relics" of the 19th century, that they are resistant to change (both good and bad) and major drain on resources. I actually wouldn't argue with you there.

    BUT, the current tech-worker situation has a lot of parallels of *why* unions were created in the first place. It's to prevent management from rolling over everybody, and to protect the workers (though sometimes it protects the wrong ones). One person has little bargaining power (unless they're the only ones that know the admin passwords). But a couple hundred of people like you, and it will get the company's attention.

    I personally dream of the day where unions will be as professional, if not more, than management in coming up with solutions to hard problems. Nowadays, unions all seem to be money grubbing, commie organizations, when really, that's just the union stewards/presidents hijacking the real agenda, which is the well-being of the workers AND the company.

    I'm not saying that unions are perfect in all situations, but there is such a thing as professional unions (Nurses, teachers, engineers that work at my plant).

    1. Re:It's called an "union" by xutopia · · Score: 1
      The same social movement that created unions also gave people vacation and sick leave when people would never get paid if they didn't show up one day. Minimum wage is another good things from the socialist lobbyists.

      There is too much anti-communism in North America. They point the finger at communism as an evil and as proof show that they won the race to the moon. Just because a country has more money doesn't mean they treat their citizens any better.

      One of the flaws of communism was that it was too strict and too patriotic to see it's own flaws. Does anyone see a parrallel?

    2. Re:It's called an "union" by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the 8 hour working day, which cost the blood of hundreds if not thousands of workers, a large part of them Americans. The tradition of May day demonstrations was a direct result of the US labor movement and it's fight for the 8 hour working day.

    3. Re:It's called an "union" by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh.

      Unlike some of the rabid pro-union activists posting here, you make some very good points.

      However, most of the crap and exploitation pulled by the managers is illegal. Working extra hours with no pay? In most of the first and second worlds, that's strictly illegal, unless covered by a specific employment contract provision. (and even then, it's often not considered an allowable clause)

      Most unions I see today exist for two purposes: The well being of the union (first and foremost), and the exploitation of the company for the increased benefit of the workers. Both of these are bad.

      The first is pretty obvious. People repeatedly ask me why the second is bad though, and you've hit one of the two nails squarely on the head.

      1) The union should exist for the well being of the employee and the company both.
      2) The union should ensure that the employee gets treated fairly--not better every year than the one before.

      This second point is a bit awkwardly written, but I can't think of a better way to word it. When I hear about unions bargaining tools, they invariably want:

      - better BASE pay (above and beyond cost of living and merit increases)
      - better benefits (with no regard to the current benefits package)
      - absolute job security (creating a disconnect between performance and security)

      Now I will be the first to jump up and down about fair pay, good benefits, and just job security; but unions seem to be pushing hard to make sure that every year increases their well-being at the expense of the company. Furthermore, they do it by invoking/enforcing the dual image of management as utterly evil capitalists, and non-union workers as helpless opressed slaves. This is just crap.

      Good, working unions aren't a bad thing at all, but they're needed rarely these days, and are almost entirely non-existent.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    4. Re:It's called an "union" by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 1

      Yes, but things DO out-live their usefulness eventually. Unions did great things in the past, now they don't. Most places, unions are currently useless artifacts (but not all, SAG being at least one that unfortunately needs to exist). Unions should come and go as needed, not exist for their own sake as a lot of them do today.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  281. Take your cue from the trade unions by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 1

    I don't think unemployment or accepting the current situation are the only options.

    From the main article: You get the feeling that the company is just going to take advantage of you no matter how and what happens. (emphasis added)

    Have you, as a group, gotten together with your supervisor and his boss (and possibly his boss's boss) and told them that you're unhappy with the situation? Unions don't walk out first and then tell their demands. A strike really is a last resort. Long before you even mention that to your boss, sit down and tell him what's bugging you, and see what they can do for you.

    A lot of times you can get at least some of the more onerous crap reduced. Probably there won't be a raise, and there won't be monetary compensation for on-call time. But there could be added vacation time or something like that. There may be other informal things they could do.

    It sucks when a good job gets worse, but this happens in a downturn. But that's gonna happen, because your boss's job also got worse. There's more sh*t raining down on him from above (and those above usually either have creditors, shareholders, or auditors raining it down on them). If you really want another job, then follow the time-honored approach of finding your new job before leaving your old one (because it works a lot better). Unless you've got a stockpile of money and want to take a vacation for a while. But be sure to start back into the job hunt a LONG time (at least 6 months) before that runs out, or be prepared to work at McDonalds/Kinkos/WalMart/temp-agency for a while to make ends meet.

    Seriously. Don't let your boss think things are ok and then suddenly walk out. And don't fall into the trap of thinking that you're LUCKY to have a job, but don't just throw a job away because you're angry.

    --
    if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}
  282. Don't give the company an ultimatum by ImACucumber · · Score: 1

    You should talk to your management first about how you feel you are being treated. But above all else don't say that if they don't give you what you want that you'll leave, unless you are really willing to. After you make an ultimatum like that, the company will see you as being totally unloyal. They may give you what you requested, but they will be looking for ways to get rid of you.

  283. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by nick_davison · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Communication (and the understanding that comes with it) really is the key to dealing with most situations that leave you pissed off.

    Every single company I have ever worked for in the IT industry, going back over about a decade now, has had asshole management. Every single one has had groups of pissed of grunts (or groups of lower mgmt as I progressed). I finally reached the point where I stopped and wondered what the common link was?

    People who work in IT are, now the gold diggers are gone, generally slightly obsessive, lacking in social skills, nerd types.

    The managers have next-to no social skills. The grunts have next-to no social skills. Add in to that the grunts used to be treated like gold dust and have entitlement complexes while the management hated that and are now getting their revenge.

    The thing is, you can't change the management. Now the economy is tanked, they know you have no leverage over them. You can get together and talk about mass walkouts but the reality is, unless everyone goes, they can hire new and retrain - and probably for less than they're paying you. And you know that at least one of your indignant group will buckle for the job security. Walkouts are a nice dream for taking the power back but they're just that. There goes your one form of leverage.

    So, if you can't change them, what can you change? Well, there's the other side of the equation. If shit ain't going to get better, it's probably time to learn to deal with shit.

    Find a good anger management book. It'll help you understand that anger is just stress manifesting with an anger trigger. Turning stress in to anger just leaves you pissed off and stressed. It'll help you learn to rephrase situations for yourself so you can dissipate that stress better.

    One of the main things they'll talk about is the fallacy of entitlement. The notion of "should"s. You're probably reading this thinking, "Why should I have to be the one to change?!" Simple question for you: Honestly now, is there anything you can do to get them to change? Try thinking of three situations in your life where you've been yelled at and told you "should" change and have actually done so - do you think it'll suddenly work for your managers? If you can't get them to change, do you really want to just stay in the same stressful, unhappy situation?

    Get a book, take a class, whatever, on anger management. It'll teach you to dissipate the anger so the next thing that comes up doesn't seem quite so bad. Once you're chilled, you might find better ways to get the change you want. Even if you don't, at least the fucked up job will be more tolerable.

  284. We did it by ansible · · Score: 1

    We were the engineering team for a small dot com type company. We believed the managment wasn't headed in the right direction.

    So we started our own company. It has been rough, like it has for any tech company in 2001-2002. But we're still here, and things are now looking better.

    If you really respect your mangement, you'll probably work better, and be more productive.

    So as long as you can line up some customers, I'd say do it.

  285. I'll take your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, unemployment sucks. I've got a lot of experience and can (and have) adapted to many different environments and companies. I'd love to work 60 hour weeks and have too much to do. It sure beats sitting at home wondering how I'm going to pay the rent next month and deciding which bills I'm going to pay.

    In this market your job is too valuable. Keep it.

  286. Why should you help someone with no foresight? by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just like people should have savings to tide them over rough times, shouldn't companies? Why should an employee have to pay with his time when the company didn't see problems coming or plan for a downturn?

    The company owes the employee a decent management team that doesn't run the company into the ground. If they can't hold up their end, all bets are off.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why should you help someone with no foresight? by scrytch · · Score: 1

      > Just like people should have savings to tide them over rough times, shouldn't companies?

      Because companies are valued by their stock price. It's illegal to "smooth" your balance sheets with cash assets (because it's not really income), so when your quarterly earnings reports fluctuate, people dump your stock, your value goes down, you can't get financed, you are history. It's not all that bad if you warn people beforehand that the next couple quarters will be bad, but if I had that kind of power I'd be picking horses (hey I won $5 betting against Funny Cide, maybe I should)

      Some companies (Ferarri is one I believe) steadfastly ignore demands to issue a quarterly earnings report, and issue only annual reports. They usually end up looking a lot more stable as a result.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  287. We did exactly that by KGBear · · Score: 1

    The situation you described matches exactly what happened in the company I worked for 4 years ago. Our group was called the "Technology Division" and we provided 100% of the technology services to the whole company (Brazilian branch of a multinational bank). For years life was good. We were 7 well-respected, well-payed professionals. Then suddenly we were 4 overworked, underpayed geeks. The 4 of us got together and 3 of us decided to walk - the 4th was afraid to take the risk. We opened our consulting company and the bank became our first client. We were very happy for 3 years after that. We were still overworked, not as much underpayed but we had a lot more freedom. These days the situation is not a bed of roses, though. The bank finally went over (well, almost) and we don't get nearly as much contracts from them any longer. Through the years we have put together a nice client roster, though. We are still struggling but our heads are above the water line. We now have 4 employees, we own the building where we work and have put together a nice, lean technology consulting company. Most of all: it's been a lot of fun!

  288. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by infinite9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is no "company", a single malevolent entity that is treating you like dirt.

    No, but there sure is a small circle of executives who make those tough decisions while on the way to the golf club in their 7 series BMW for a nice lobster dinner. The company I work for just cut vacation. I get 1 week a year now. I also have to take it before the fiscal year end on 9/1. So there's now no time to accrue vacation before christmas. How nice. And those altruistic beings who are just looking out for the company? Let's see how quick they are to give back that benefit once the economy turns around.

    There are a lot of individuals involved in the decisions to ask more hours of you, put you on call w/o extra compensation, etc.. Right now, one of your managers is probably talking to his superior, saying "well, I guess we could ask W and X to handle those few extra on-call hours... it sure sucks, but they seem to be okay with the increases so far, and someone has to do it. That should keep customers Y and Z with us, so we'll be okay on payroll through this quarter, at least."

    Talk about a major case of rose colored glasses. When these wonderful managers mismanage the company into the ground, then ask me to clean up their mess, should I?
    You have to ASSUME that everyone is on your side from the very beginning, and start talking to your manager, their manager, etc.. Let them know that you and the other grunts are starting to give under the strain. Find out what the problems of the company are, and talk about how the company is dealing with them.


    Have you ever had a paycheck bounce? I have. Have you ever had your employer siezed by the IRS for failure to pay payroll taxes? I have. Have you ever been promised bonueses on eight separate occaisions and received a fraction on one only once? I have. Have you ever been fired because your manager thought you were better than him? I have. Have you ever gotten in trouble for not predicting the future or reading someone's mind? I have. Have you ever predicted a project's failure months and millions of dollars in advance? I have.

    Have you ever been warned before your employer goes out of business? I never have.
    Employers are not on your side. Ever. There are only two possibilities. If it's a private company, they're on the owner's side. If it's a public company, they're on the shareholder's side. Never yours. You are a commodity to be exploited however possible, no matter what the HR propaganda says.

    Instead, decide where your breaking point would be, and discuss it reasonably ("if this happens, I'd really have to leave, and neither of us wants that to happen"). You are NOT making threats. Make this clear. Explain that you will keep your manager informed as the situation evolves, and that you will not leave without warning.


    And you'll be the first to be laid off. Employers want sheep. If you want to keep your job, act like one. Tell them nothing because they're certainly not volunteering any information. If you don't like your job, find another one. But never let them know you're looking. Otherwise, they'll remove you before you have the next job lined up.

    Like it or not, you're in a business relationship with your employer. One in which you're at an extreme disadvantage. If your employer wants to cut your benefits, they simply say, "Well, things are tight, so we're zapping vacation this year." Can you imagine what would happen if you did that? "Well boss, you've been working me harder so I'm going to take an extra week of vacation this year." After the laughter subsides, they'll replace you.

    The work culture in this country sucks. And it's time for a change.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  289. Starting your own company.... by dmayle · · Score: 1

    One important thing to note is the group who left JBoss (I think they're called Core Something or other now) started their own company.

    I've read tons of post that complain about the recession, and how you'd be screwing yourself out of a job. That's defeatist thinking from the start. If the only way you can imagine yourself making a living is by finding some company to hire you, than you will more often than not one of the beleagured and put upon.

    Start a company, write a book, change professions... Join a commune, join peace corps, join geek corps...

    There will be a recession as long as people are not sufficiently motivated to go out and make a change for themselves. Industrialized nations produce far more output than is necessary for the sustenance of their citizens. Booms happen when there is a high rate of transfer/churn of the money that does exist. Conversely, busts happen, when everyone freezes up, gets scared, and stops taking the risks necessary to keep things smoothly flowing.

    I realize that some or all of the options I mentioned may not be possible for YOU, but if you aren't willing to look for other options at all, than your complaints will fall on deaf ears.

    Note: This economics mentioned here are grossly oversimplified, but that doesn't make them untrue...

  290. Why not just "go on strike" instead? by j+h+woodyatt · · Score: 1

    ...oh that's right. We're too smart for organizing into labor unions. What was I THINKING about?

    --
    jhw
  291. Obligatory Simpsons reference by frAme57 · · Score: 2, Funny
    No Bart, don't quit - just go in every day and do your job half-assed. That's the American way!

    Homer Simpson

    --
    "In a hierarchy every employee will rise to his level of incompetence". The Peter Principle
  292. Threats worked for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I called all the department heads, and said "If person X is fired, we will lose the rest of the department. These three people will tell you so to your face if you ask them, these ten people will say "oh, please don't fire X" while sending out resumes in every direction, and the remaining three are the only easily replaceable people you've got."

    The next day (it was a saturday) the CEO called three people out of the blue and said "What would you do if X were let go?" and they all said "If you are telling me X is gone, I will come in to clean out my desk Monday."

    Person X is still working here & is the CIO now.

    But you can't be bluffing or it won't work.

  293. It's a small world out there by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is very true, and particularly true if you live in a second or third tier city where the community of IT Directors/CIOs and higher-level IT opportunities is limited. If you should *succeed* at crippling a business for a period of time, you could get blacklisted as a troublemaker and have difficulty finding a job or getting promitions if you do find a job.

    I also wonder if a particularly successful fscking of an IT infrastructure couldn't put you at some risk for a lawsuit claiming sabotage. Even if it didn't have a chance of success, you're unemployed and having to defend yourself in a civil suit. That $25k in savings will disappear in a blink just getting a bogus suit dismissed, one with a shade of merit? Hello, homelessness!

    My personal "extreme quitting" plan would be to submit a letter to my boss outlining my reasons for leaving, as well as outlining my availability on a contract basis to provide continuity on these NON-NEGOTIABLE terms:

    1) Work will be billed at a rate of $200 per hour with a four hour per day minimum, including telephone consultation, travel and offsite work.

    2) All expenses, including meals, parking, travel, supplies and equipment required will be billed and provided by the vendors of my choosing. I will seek approval for all purchases over $500 and all materials will become the company's property when my consulting term is over.

    3) The company will indemnify me against any damage or losses resulting during my contractual employment.

    4) An up-front non-refundable retainer of $5000, payable in cashier's check or cash ONLY, is required before any work, including telephone consultation, will take place. The first 25 billable hours will be subtracted from this retainer.

    5) Payment for all hours is due via cash or cashier's check on the Friday of each week before any further work will be performed.

    This prevents them from saying you fucked them to harm them and won't help, you have a better basis for arguing you didn't like the job/pay/whatever. The frequent cash payment requirements keep them honest and from getting work and just not paying, important if there's financial problems with the company or if they just have no choice.

    Of course in my personal fantasy I get a call from my ex-boss 72 hours later saying they agree to all these terms and that if I will come in today that they will have a cashier's check for $5k waiting for me. I work for about 40 hours and make two months salary.

    1. Re:It's a small world out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been done before. But, you messed up the retainer. It isn't the first 25 hours that come out of the retainer, it is the last 25 hours.

    2. Re:It's a small world out there by swb · · Score: 1

      Sorry, having never actually executed this plan I didn't know what mistakes I was making.

      You're right, though, that works better, and if its non-refundable, if the work is under 25 hours total, you just reap a higher average hourly rate.

    3. Re:It's a small world out there by Gleep · · Score: 1

      I had a similar fantasy but my boss was happy to wade through resumes for a month in a vain attempt to find a suitable replacement. I think i was gonna charge $500/hr though... :)

      --
      get your dirty sig off me, you filthy APE!
    4. Re:It's a small world out there by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      2) All expenses, including meals, parking, travel, supplies and equipment required will be billed and provided by the vendors of my choosing. I will seek approval for all purchases over $500 and all materials will become the company's property when my consulting term is over.
      I would like to see how the company is going to take possesion of those meals after you quit.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:It's a small world out there by swb · · Score: 1

      Heh, the reason I still call it a fantasy is that I presume the same would happen.

      I *can* see getting a little out of them for obscure passwords or configuration assistance on something, though.

      It's only a fantasy at a reasonably managed business that doesn't treat its employees like shit and actually has sensible policies and procedures that ensure the entire company's critical IT isn't in the head of one guy.

    6. Re:It's a small world out there by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I would like to see how the company is going to take possesion of those meals after you quit.

      I wondered the same thing. I don't suppose they actually want 20 pounds of former meals, anyway).

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:It's a small world out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said something like that to my boss once, but it was only a 400$/hour 'if I ever leave and you need me' no other conditions.

      The boss thought I was trying to show-off and prove that I was essential (I was only trying to make him believe that), so he put on a big smile and said âoeWell, we will never see you again thenâ, to which I immediately reply, âoeYep, thatâ(TM)s the plan all right!â

      He was pretty pissed off, but it was worth it for that look of total surprise on his face.

  294. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by matt_martin · · Score: 1
    Ok, so if you tell them exactly how many extra hours you will be willing to work; get ready to work exactly that number of hours.

    Your personal drive WILL be exploited, thats the way the system works. I've sat in on meetings where managers said "Yeah, I keep piling more stuff on so-and-so's plate and he keeps doing it. So don't worry, we'll give him this too".

    The part you're not mentioning is the large, pork ridden company mentality: even while rome burns and you are "sacrificing" to prop up the company, there will be people in the cube next getting in at 9:01, leaving at 4:59, taking 2 hour lunches, and loudly flaunting their lack of interest in doing anything to support the bottom line all day long !

    Motivation to break your own back ? I think not!

    --
    Lurking in the desert
  295. Re:Don't you mean.. by Tekman3 · · Score: 1

    In this life you are an Overlord, slave or freelancer.

  296. Think of our own sanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked for a company where I would have loved to have done the mass-resignation thing. It never happened, but I have to say all the better.

    If you're leaving to start your own business, and you've asked a few buddies to come work for you, then that's a good thing for you and them. I mean, you're moving on to something you hope will be better than where you are - very positive.

    If you're just going to leave to be unemployed, then you have to wonder what the point of that is. If you've got savings so you can ride out a few months of watching TV, then fine, but it's unlikely you and your buddies all have that sort of backup. In other words, one or more of you are likely to ebd up watching TV and not doing anything positive (perhaps even wondering why you left in the first place).

    If all this seems a bit too complicated, then take my dad's advice (given to me when I stomped out of a shop job I had when I was 18): "Never leave a job unless you have another one to go to". Of course, "another job" can include holidays, travelling, retraining, etc etc, but you get the idea.

  297. take the professional road... by big!theory · · Score: 1

    An organized walkout will appear to be exactly what it is... A premeditated attempt to screw the company. This is a time-honored union tactic. This is a not a professional tactic. You should all be highly skilled, highly paid professionals. Time to grow up. Meet (you, individually) with the boss. Make no reference to what others say or feel. Lay out all that you do and make your case for the raise that will make all this worth it. When they say no, then give your full notice (two weeks minimum). If you are key guy on the project then give a longer notice. Maybe a month. Then leave. Vote with your feet. If there really are better paying jobs available to you with better working conditions, then prove it. If you orchestrate a company failure, word will get around. Your references will suck. Remember. Professionals get paid more than union guys. Don't be seduced by union tactics. In the long run, a union will make programmers rule-driven, trapped by seniority rules, with the old COBOL deadwood guys making all the money. If you really have the tech chops, that is. If you are worse than average, then a union might raise your level.

  298. Straight forward by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Ok I have been in this position at 2 seperate companies. It's a pretty straight froward proccess.

    If you think the company will make it and want to stay long term:

    Find another job or at least a in writting long term consulting gig.

    Go to your management there management generaly the first teir that you know but dont work with on a daily basis. Ask them to compensate you and get a good writting iron clad contract (think penalties) or you have a couple written offers for other companies with a better deal work whatever make sure not to go overboard they might know each other you never know.

    They will generaly come back with a counter offer fairly quickly if you like it take it remember that contract length with penalties it's important the company may try and replace you asap to keep the other worker bees in line.

    Otherwise work on that resume and give 2 weeks notice when the time is right. Also dont do a pile of extra work; oh yea on call hrm not getting paid for it, sorry not reachable going on vacation for the weekend. If your management depending on the state your only supposed to do 5 hours max of management related overtime a week not 20 of real work.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  299. Just remember... by rongage · · Score: 1

    There are a LOT of out of work programmers and system admin/techie types out in the real world. These guys are hungry, and in many cases, have mouths at home to feed.

    Don't overplay your being indispensible to the company as you are quite likely to find out how quickly you can be replaced. In other words, don't just walk off the job - that would be interpreted as a mass-quit.

    Others have said it, and I'll repeat it. If you want the protection of federal labor laws on your side, then unionizing is your only option. Only when you properly organize and are represented by a union do you get the benefit of the NRLB (National Labor Relations Board). It also becomes quite illegal to fire people for organizating efforts./P.

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
  300. Loyalty is a two-way street by SuperBusTerror · · Score: 0

    My company offers generous salaries, stock options, and benefits, yet is flexible with work hours and vacation time (or at least my boss is). We aren't expected or motivated to work more than 40 hour weeks. Additionally, though a privately-held company, they are completely forthcoming about company financials. (Yes, the stock options are only theoretically valuable.)

    So I'm loyal to my company because I feel that they treat me well.

    --
    -- Aaron
    1. Re:Loyalty is a two-way street by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt all this. I think to prove it you should privately send me the name of the hiring manager there.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  301. Advice by SkankhodBeeblebrox · · Score: 1

    Be damned sure of the people who going to walk-out with you...

    I was in a similar situation myself, and while the department I was in was small (there were only 3 of us) when the time came to walk, I was the only one with the balls to leave...

    End result, I ended up quitting (and going back to school, which wasn't a major mistake, but I'm yet to find a decent job) the other 2 ended up getting raises for staying...

  302. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by styopa · · Score: 1

    I had a friend who did something like this roughly a year ago. The group he was apart, which was essential at the time, of was getting lied to, overworked etc etc...

    My friend approached the management and told them that there was talk in the department of a strike. He also told them that they had felt betrayed by the company due to the repetative lies from higher management about raises and appropriate work hours. He calmly informed them that no one wanted to strike but that they felt like they had no other choice since they weren't being heard any other way, and most of the deparement was looking to him to resolve the situation either through talks with management or organizing the strike. His boss and his bosses boss agreed with him and tried to help but were powerless. The higher management sent someone else to appraise the situation, whom my friend warned to tread lightly because most of the department was really upset, she didn't heed his words and was verbally abused for the entire meeting. After their appraisal the higher management's solution was to give my friend a raise but no one else, wait until the next round of scheduled layoffs to fire the entire department and then rehire 3/4 of them back in a months time. They didn't rehire any of the employees that had any leadership skills or repor with the management. The people who did get their jobs back were elated because they couldn't find anything else in the market.

    I agree with the opinion of jtheory but I think that you should have someone else do the talking. If you show to them that you are willing to do something about the situation, even in a nice way, you may find yourself without a job.

    --
    Disclamer - Opinion of Person
  303. Beachfront property in Arizona by iamacat · · Score: 1

    The most likely outcome is that you will get even more work and all the unpleasent projects because the manager will assume you are going to leave anyway. Also, you will be on the top of layoff list for the same reason.

    If the company can not afford to lose you, just decide what is a reasonable workload for your salary, social life and work enjoyment and stick to it. You are unlikely to get fired just for staying professional.

    As for looking for new job, well you should always do it if you think your company is in trouble or you are not satisfied with your current work. It's already implied that you might leave, just like that you might get laid off. There is no need to say it explicitely.

  304. Been there, done that... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    Management replaced all who walked out. Six months later there was another walkout and Management was fired. However, no one who walked out was allowed back.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  305. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by lpret · · Score: 1
    I agree completely! I'm not a 40/weeker yet, but these are skills I've learned through various jobs I've held before/through college. In fact, when I moved to a new Starbucks store (after 2 years in the company) I found everyone had that "us vs. them" mentality. As an ASM, I was able to work on both sides and help them communicate their feelings. The best thing I found was anonyminity (sp?). When people don't feel that they will get crucified for saying that they disliked it when the SM would speak in a loud tone when other customers were nearby, they will say what they really feel. And once the SM decides to work on these things, output and speed increase. Happy employees make a better business.

    It was this that made me want to study Human Resources, the conflict resolution, the different solutions for each situation -- I find it amazingly interesting.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  306. Bullshit by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    No offence meant, but you really speak like the average insecure tech robot. The world is NOT a small place.

    1. Re:Bullshit by qtp · · Score: 1

      That depends on who your employer is, what clubs he belongs to, and who he knows.

      I've pissed off the wrong person outside of work before and I'm pretty much fucked for life because of it.

      --
      Read, L
    2. Re:Bullshit by mandolin · · Score: 1
      No offence meant, but you really speak like the average insecure tech robot. The world is NOT a small place.

      True, but it turns out a city *is* a small place. 1/2 the people at my current work know each other from previous jobs. So I'd have to agree with the grandparent post. In general, but especially if you'd rather not move, try to minimize the bridge-burning.

    3. Re:Bullshit by EverDense · · Score: 1

      True, but it turns out a city *is* a small place.

      The IT industry in YOUR city must be isolated, insular and incestuous. Otherwise, perhaps it
      is just coincidence that people know each other.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    4. Re:Bullshit by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      Though I don't think you are lying, the idea of this boggles my mind. Can you give any more details? I just can't even imagine how this would happen, unless your "fucked for life" statement applies only to small areas.

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    5. Re:Bullshit by mandolin · · Score: 1
      The IT industry in YOUR city must be isolated, insular and incestuous

      Well, I'll just go ahead and assume that you believe most cities aren't like that. I haven't personally run into ex-coworkers, unless you count the 2-3 people who were re-hired by the same company they left. But quite a few here have.

      For comparison's sake, I work near Austin TX. What's your city?

  307. Don't flee - work properly: priorize, escalate by yabHuj · · Score: 4, Informative

    Been there, didn't do that.

    While reducing staff projects upon projects were piled at a big5 company I worked for. At one point we had to say "Stop".

    Did not walk out.

    We compiled a list of ToDo's, went to our superior (okay, our superior's superior) and told him to give all these Priority-A-1-Alpha projects unique numbers. He has the big picture - or is at least paid to make decisions. So he decides. Not us.

    He tried to argue (you must know - you're the techies), even actually tried to walk away. We said: okay, then we'll assume you hand us a blanko cheque okay to priorize. We'll then have this (interesting, but only moderately urgent) project with top priority (which still was sensible/okay but not the most urgent one) and continue down the list after finnishing.

    No! He cried. Other projects...! We handed him the list again: Here. Numbers. Nonrepeating. You decide - or we have to. You know our suggestion. Decision still is your responsibility (i.e. your neck). So he told uns a preliminary No.1 - and followed up with a clean priority list.

    With this we were able to work without overtime. Just worked 40(+epsilon) hours a week, and had priorities to fend off requests for "just a bit more" work (More work on your project? Then talk about priorities with Mr.X).

    As for "a bit more overtime" - overtime and crunch mode only works for very limited ammounts of time (common knowledge is max. 2 weeks). After that stress-induced errors and illness have a very offsetting effect. If you're more stress-resistant that the remainder of your team, just fall back to the average to take speed and pressure out of the system. Noone can prove wether you really cannot find the one proper file among all the garbage crunch-mode-produced yestarday. It's very hard to differenciate between real symptomes of stress-induced illness or faked ones.

    It even is a great opportunity to you, your team and even the company to introduce a task delegation and priorizing system - or other ones to steer projects and processes (e.g. change control procedures). Just to make sure, the really important business cases are handled properly and quality-assured, of course... ;-)

    Escalation:

    If the problem is your direct superior (S1), walk to his superior (S2). Or to his superior's superior (S3). If he understands the problem - fine. If not, start bouncing the problems back to them. They have to decide on priorities: "Which one - A or B - decide NOW!" - where the NOW is important as the project is important and must be complete NOW (so it's not your NOW, but his or the customer's one). You even can use it to jump levels (beyond/around S1 to S2) - simply have your colleague do the same talk with S1 simultaneously - so you can't reach him for decision and so you went to S2 because of the project's utter importance. If the answers contradict, go back to S2+S1 and tell that S1 (or S2) just ordered you otherwise (sorry for the overlap - it's just due to the hectic...), and you want a confirmation.

    Simply bounce the pressure back. They have to slice the work into managable chunks - that's what managers are for. Just bounce it back for re-assignment. Because you want to see the project done, too (of course) and see THIS (chunk) will not be working (or contradicting with other stuff).

    So get priorization and escalate, i.e. bounce irresponsible pressure, untaken responsibilities and not done decisions back to from where they come and where they belong. All for the sake of professional work and successful projects, of course (*NO* irony here).

    This can even enhance your own position, especially if you give your superiors good (priority) suggestions and decision reationales. And suddenly you're not only programmer or admin, but on the track to project manager...

    Qapla'!

    1. Re:Don't flee - work properly: priorize, escalate by Gallowglass · · Score: 1
      This is probably the best answer to anyone who is overworked. Right on. If I had points, I'd mod you up further.

      A manager's job is to manage! Unfortunately, most people in managerial positions behave like bosses (order passers, overseers) rather than managers (planners, analysts, designers). Sometimes you have to force them to do their proper function. In this case taking responsibility for prioritizing the work tasks.

      Of course, if this doesn't work, then you'd better leave before they crash and burn.

      Excellent comment!

    2. Re:Don't flee - work properly: priorize, escalate by davecb · · Score: 1
      A pair of colleagues once had a management structure that wasn't prepared to listen to concerns like burnout, overwork and at least one bout of fisticuffs.

      So everyone in the department wore good clothes one day, and said they had appointmenets later in the day, without saying what kind.

      Eventually the VP accounting (who had been the receiver for one of my old employers) noticed that something was suspicious and went looking for someone to ask about their part of the management tree.

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    3. Re:Don't flee - work properly: priorize, escalate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get down on your knees and give thanks to the deity you worship that you worked for someone that rational.

    4. Re:Don't flee - work properly: priorize, escalate by yabHuj · · Score: 1

      Nope - much simpler: you escalate the problem that not all projects can be fulfilled (i.e. sold to the customer). Spell "financial and/or customer loss" to upper (!) management and the very most suddenly become very rational. That's usually not nice to the middle man(agament) - i.e. the one between you and the uppermanagement - but quite effective.

      "Hey, nothing personal - it's only business..."

      No, I am not evil. But sometimes... ;-)

  308. My Experience by EinarTh · · Score: 1

    I've had this happen to me twice, and this is what happens when you decide to stay after the initial cutbacks:

    Your workload increases, output decreases, work satisfaction disappears completely, projects and services get cancelled and gradually fall into disarray.

    Next, management realises that several departments (i.e. yours) aren't performing well enough or that your services seem to be sub-par and decides to 1) outsource your job function, and/or 2) 'restructure' the departments down to it's skeleton functionality.

    That means you're either out of a job or you end up being one of the few 'lucky' ones who gets loaded with responsibilities and end up hating your job more then the plague.

    My advice:
    Be professional, get your folks together and try to see where management is going with this, make firm but fair suggestions, if possible, as to improve your condition. If they're not willing to meet them, give your X-weeks notice and then walk out.

    --
    -- Computers are not intelligent. They just think they are.
  309. Ignore the parental advice. by qtp · · Score: 1

    But be careful.

    Trying to coordinate a departmental walkout can get you and any conspirators screwed, as in blacklisted. If only one person you aproach with the idea dissagrees with you, or has a "lifer" mentality, then this could get you fired in an ugly way.

    Also, you might not get unemployment compensation if your employer is willing to pay for the lawyers to fight it and/or the unemployment arbitrators are biased against the employee (depends on the local political environment).

    If you've already taken these thoughts into consideration, and you've weighed the risks carefully, then fsck 'em and walk (don't forget to delete all of your saved but unsubmitted work from the system before you leave).

    Your best bet might be to discuss with your co-conspirators a plan to either help each other find employment, or to do as another poster suggested and create a consultancy of yourself and your coleagues.

    --
    Read, L
  310. Be Machievelian about it. by LibertineR · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First, walkouts are for pussies. If you walk out, understand that your job is 99% over. Your mission at this point is to get revenge on your boss. If you are let back in, it will only be until your ass can be replaced. So, decide that if you are going, go.

    Now, here is the hard part.

    Say NOTHING.

    No contact, period.

    Just leave, dont look back, accept no messages, open no mail, just send it back unopened. If your entire crew does that, you can insure that your former boss is toast. One thing that people do naturally is talk too much. Silence is power.

    If you keep quiet, the HR department will be ORDERED to find out what happened. Meanwhile your group picks a single person who is NOT an employee to do all the talking for your side. If you let multiple people talk, they will turn your words against you. It also prevents you from being served with a lawsuit notice.

    That person meets with HR off the premises alone, and gives them a single list of complains attributed to the group, without specifying individuals. HR will demand to speak to employees before anything happens. Resist and let them replace you if nessesary. Do NOT allow anyone from your group to speak with them for any reason, no matter how trivial.

    The frustration will be directed at your Boss who is still there. Their ability to manage people will be questioned. There could be no other conclusion, due to your extreme position in not speaking with them. Your company will start looking for your boss' replacement while he is looking for yours.

    You may never get your jobs back, but you can insure that the pain you cause your company will cause your boss to lose his job too. You need to decide just how far you are willing to take this. If you are just pissed off, you will get no satisfaction. If you are committed, you might be able to inact some sort of revenge on your former boss.

    Look around at your group. If you have any pussies in it, forget the above and get back to work; you fucking slacker, you.

  311. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by spotteddog · · Score: 1

    I tried this approach (years ago with a company that was just recently sold in pieces to pad the CEO's retirement fund). I discussed the situation with my manager, stated (calmly) that this would not be the situation in a year. He agreed - said they would hire someone to help out. Several times during the following year I was told the position was approved, and would be posted. Despite the continued assurances from my manager, and his manager, the situation only got worse. I walked (*AFTER* finding a new job), they tried to grab a replacement from the "internal pool" of IT people. About two months later I checked in with my old collegues - one of the systems I maintained (which they *demanded* 100% uptime from, was mission critical to about 300 people in several countries) had crashed and was down for over a week.

    They never did post for that position AFAIK.

    Later I found out they divided my job functions among 3 people (two new and one existing). All I wanted them to do was hire one person to lighten the load a bit.......

    Guess it just goes to show ya, the Universe has a way of getting eve

    --
    . there used to be a sig here.....
  312. Beware of pansy co-workers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried this once. We had a group of 6 people ready to walk out the door...When we didn't get what we asked for we had agreed to all leave at the same time in "F You" fashion.

    To my suprise, when I turned around I was the only one walking. A lot of people talk a big game, but when it comes down to crunch time they'll fold on you.

  313. Your get drunk with your buddies by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You get drunk with your 'walk out' buddies. Then in the light of day, you wake up and have dinner. You basically do every you would normally do when you quit a job, including wish they had fired you instead so you collect unemployment.

    Will you teach them a lesson? Yes; you will teach them that they can find cheaper people that are silly enough to work the long hours without complaint (for a while). You will help them fix their financial problem and/or help them to an ealier demise. But the chances of them begging you to come back like your were an abused spouse is probably pretty low.

    Instead, I would opt for the 'fsck the bank I work for' mentality and go home when your tired, and live a happy life. When something better comes along, take it.

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  314. My situation by TrippTDF · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work at a small company, and we have been hit by the falling economy. We have pulled the office back to four days a week, and four days pay. We have also had to start paying half of our own health insurance. I know it's a MOJOR bonus that we didn't pay anything at all, but now we are paying a hefty amount at the same time that we all get our pay cut.

    The problem that is arising with management (Management really consists of one person. It's a small office) is that we are supposed to maintain high levels of work, come in on the week-ends, stay late, even though we are only working 4 days a week. We are all feeling taken advantage of, but the job market is so bad, there is not a lot we can do to at this point.

    I swear to GOD I had a point when I started writing this post, but I have no idea what it was now. Maybe I just needed to get that off my chest.

  315. Union by zhevek · · Score: 1

    Though this is a late post, I still say: overworked and underpaid... sounds like you need to organize a union. Sad part is that almost no computer industry jobs are unionized.

  316. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    Been there done that.

    What happens when all the communication is one-sided? What happens when all the management spends it's time doing is trying to set the staff against each other, which might work, except that the staff DOES communicate, which just adds fuel to the whole situation becuase their attempts are so pathetically transparent.

    There is so much intertia here, that nothing happens quickly, or even close. But pressure has likewise been building for a looooong time. I honestly don't see what else could be done. I don't know if the situation is unsalvageable, but it's certainly close.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  317. Stressed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) See Doctor.
    2) Get signed off work.
    3) Be happy.

    Ok, so it wont impress your co-workers but if the burden lies on them tell them to start at step 1. ;)

    In the end you get,

    4) No people to run office.

  318. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Carbonite · · Score: 1

    The original poster had his facts wrong. $65,000 is above even the combined household income. The actual value is closer to $35,000 for a full-time employee.

    --
    ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
  319. Stand up for yourselves by br00tus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Reading through the comments here, there seems to be two types, ones telling you to consider things on the basis of fear, and ones giving other advice.

    What you've really done is formed a union or basis for a union, though that word has a specific bureaucratic meaning in the U.S. Some people here have said it might be bad form to just say screw you and leave. Perhaps, if you're all together on this, perhaps you should approach your employers and tell them what you're unhappy with and what you want - no unpaid overtime or oncall, and in terms of being treated like dirt, perhaps more control over your work and some type of grievance procedure. If you're so sick of it you feel you just want to leave, just demand exactly what you all want and don't give in, then they can't say you just walked out - they just didn't pay attention to your demands.

    Some people have said the job market is bad. It wouldn't be if more people did this - 2 people working 60 hour weeks without overtime pay is the same as 3 people working 40 hour weeks - they've put someone out of work with their lack of value for their time. But in terms of that, if one of you walks out you are easily replaced - if all of you threaten to walk out, or strike or whatnot at once, then that becomes less so - all of a sudden you become on more equal footing with the company. It depends on the situation, but in many cases something like a strike is exactly equal - you are hurt by not getting a paycheck, but the company operating without an IT department, or with IT scabs who have no idea what they're doing.

    Decades ago, when people were treated like garbage, had work dumped on them and were told to work 60 hour weeks and be oncall 24/7, they used to do what you're doing almost naturally. That's why things didn't go to garbage. This is supposed to be a white collar profession for pete's sake. Half the people here are telling you to consider only the things that go wrong, that you should live like a coolie. It's a disgusting mentality that's crept in - be a man, especially if you're under 35 and don't have kids. I can see people in bad spots (H1-Bs, big families with little savings) being fearful, but if you're a 23 year old programmer, being a patsy for some company owner who is squeezing you dry is insane.

    There are also other tactics that have been mentioned here like a "slow down". There are all kind of tactics like this, it's unfortunate that the community is so weak that it is difficult to learn things like this. It's helpful to all of us when people in your situation can talk to other IT workers and get some good ideas and community support. The employers sure as hell do it with organizations like the ITAA, that's one of the reasons we're in the boat we're in. There are organizations like the Programmers Guild and Washtech and so forth.

    Have some backbone! In solidarity there's strength. If you're all together you DEFINITELY have leverage over the company. That's one thing the company and people of a certain mindset want to convince you of - they are all-powerful, you are weak and scared. Bullshit. In Europe, they are putting through crap people don't like with pensions and guess what - 80% of the workers in the country are going on strike. You can be certain Faux News doesn't cover that story - it might give people ideas. And guess what - the government and people pushing for that junk back off. That's why they have education systems where they don't have to import 1 million H1-Bs because supposedly there's not enough educated people in the US to do the IT jobs. When those European workers walk out of their jobs en masse, all of a sudden the shoe's on the other foot - the rich, and the bosses and the owners, and the government can't do a damn thing, THEY'RE the ones shaking in their boots - not the workers. What are the bosses going to do, fire all of the workers in the country? The reality is that the people who do the work in the company are the ones with all of the power, the owners and managers have po

  320. uh oh by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    You get the feeling that the company is just going to take advantage of you no matter how and what happens. You get together with the rest of the department for a 'fsck this company' meeting and decide to walk out.

    I wonder how many PHBs just thought to themselves, "oh shit, I hope he's not talking about us."

  321. Help yourself, help your company by carolchi · · Score: 1

    Write a business plan for outsourcing your department's work (to yourselves).
    Present it to the management and offer to set up the idea company for outsourcing to (their own department).
    If they have financial problems they will love apparent the cost savings and headcount reduction and even help you set up on your own.
    You are in the perfect position to write a good contract for yourselves, to know what the management think they are getting from you, and how much time and effort it will take to deliver it to them.
    But be sure you are ready to run your own business.
    I did something similar (left and started my own business with my former employer as major client) 15 years ago in the last big recession, and have great quality of life. My former employer has been through Chapter 11 twice and been acquired 3 times and no longer exists in the form I knew it.

  322. The labor movement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly, if the labor movement is ever to see revival, I believe it will be fueled by cutbacks and consolidation.

    Where I work, for instance, we are making more money than last year. That's a good trick in our industry, given a soft economy and the fact that we've increased our (positive) cash flow from year-to-year.

    But Wall Street is greedy. It demands that companies show they are "serious" about growing profits, no matter how appropriate that growth is to actual market conditions. Nothing demonstrates seriousness more than slashing overhead, so that's what management is forced to do.

    Departments get cut to the bone, and the survivors find themselves forced to take up the slack. Workers are often reduced to wage slaves, working grotesque hours, balancing tasks traditionally handled by two or three people, on call at all hours. With ever-present email and cellphones, workdays are virtually as long as those of the early industrial era.

    Forcing workers to compete with each other for a declining number of positions might be great for stockholders, but it sucks for the rest of us. There's no reason a free market shouldn't be a fair market, too.

    Maybe we'll see a rise in labor actions. It's hard to imagine quick improvement, though, in the age of the all-powerful corporation.

  323. You're making it too hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If somebody has been at a job for 10 years, and they leave, I'm going to assume they have stuck through thick and thin.

    I've been at my present employer for 16 years, starting as grunt programmer and working up into incompetence (i.e. mangement).

    I look for longevity at jobs first. I just threw out a resume because the guy has never held a job for more than 1 year. Over the past 3 years, he's held 3 jobs a year. So I'm not interested in his quals.

    On the other hand, I see a couple bunch of 3-7 year stints, I'm not as interested in why they're leaving.

    And BTW, if I left under these circumstances (and I would), I'd simply tell the new employer that I was ready for new challenges.

    1. Re:You're making it too hard by Anitra · · Score: 1

      I look for longevity at jobs first. I just threw out a resume because the guy has never held a job for more than 1 year...

      What if the jobs were all temporary jobs? Personally, I've had 4-6 tech jobs (depending on how you look at it: 4 paying jobs + 2 unpaid projects that I list on my resume) in the past 3 years. Does this mean I have no loyalty? No. None of those projects/jobs were SUPPOSED to last more than 9 months. (Well, there is one exception, in which I was a volunteer for 2.5 years before I got paid for 4 months.) I would LOVE to get a job where I could envision still being there in a few years. I'd hate to think that managers like you are dismissing my resume out of hand.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
  324. Go for it... by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1

    Been in exactly this situation about three years ago, except that as chief geek I owned half the company. I said I was leaving, and did a deal with the suits that they would buy me out for UKP25,000. Two months later suits said they couldn't pay me and would I buy them out - so I offered them UKP1 and they accepted. I then gutted all the assets out of the company except one customer account and sold the company on for UKP1 to the consultant who was running that account, but that's another story. We've never looked back - much less stress, much less work (because we're carrying so much less overhead the company doesn't need to earn so much) and we're able to pay ourselves more, not less.

    Make sure you have good relationships with key customers and that those customers know which team has the competence to deliver after the split. Also make sure you aren't hit with a non-compete - they're not strictly legal here in the UK but it's still a hassle.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  325. IT Living in their own little world...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a surprising amount of whining in the posts I've read through so far. Perhaps the folks that are doing alot of the whining should realize what a /competitive/ industry is like.

    It shouldn't take an act of god (or someone with a sledgehammer) to pound the fact home: in a competitive economy you are LUCKY to have a job. I have a hunch that alot of the "whine" posts I see are from folks who graduated in the last 5-7 years: folks with unrealistic expectations of things like 40 hour work weeks.

    Look at successful _U_S_ companies. You will find very few whose employees work a "40" hour week. Ask chip design engineers. Ask automotive engineers. Ask aeronautical engineers. Ask any highly competitive industry where people are losing jobs to cheaper work.

    And if you are looking at an industry where you don't EXPECT competition, you better change your expectations. It's a world market folks.

    A department wide walkout for 50-60 hours a week? The entire automotive industry has been on 50-60 hour weeks for over a decade.

    Come on folks, get real. You want to keep your job? Shut up and work, and hope you do it cheaper, better, and smarter than the guy in China. Because THEY know what it's truly like to have nothing, and THEY'LL bust their ass for a hell of lot less pay than you will.

    Whiny children.

    And for those of you whom are going to speak up and say things like "with that attitude you'll get walked all over" - take a look at Japan. Here is a country BUILT on loyalty and life-long employment, who has recently had to admit that it just CAN NOT be done. You have to retain the flexibility to hire and lay off to stay competitive. Period.

  326. adopt the office space mentality by asscroft · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bob #1: We're trying to get a feel for what people do around here.. so, could you just walk us through a typical day for you?
    Peter: Well, sure Bob. I generally come in at least 15 minutes late. I use the side door; that way Lumbergh can't see me, and after that I just sorta space out for about an hour--
    Bob #2: Ah wait--space out?
    Peter: Yeah. I just stare at my desk. But it looks like I'm working. I do that for, uh.. probably another hour after lunch too. I'd say, in a given week, I probably only do about 15 minutes of real, actual.. work.

    worked for me for about a year and a half. Then we got a new director who didn't suck ass, and she got new managers in place that didn't suck ass and now we're all happily doing more than 15 minutes of work. Though I still find time to search slashdot and post office space quotes. That can't be considered good. But fuck it, I'm salary.

    Peter: We don't have a lot of time on this earth! We weren't meant to spend it this way. Human beings were not meant to sit in little cubicles staring at computer screens all day... filling out useless forms... and listening to eight different bosses drone on about mission statements.
    Michael: I told those fudge packers that I liked Michael Bolton's music.
    Peter: Oh that is not right, Michael.

    Peter: So I was sitting is my cubicle today, and I realized.. ever since I started working, every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me.. that's on the worst day of my life.
    Therapist: What about today? Is today the worst day of your life?
    Peter: Yeah.
    Therapist: Wow, that's messed up.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  327. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more. Nothing to do with the current economy, doing what's right for yourself, etc... In any situation, you have to try to look at it from all angles. Yours, your co-workers, your managers, etc.. before you make any kind of decision, especially a life changing (income affecting) one like this. Believe it or not, (most) managers are human, and tend to be under a different set of pressures. My current manager is level headed and understands the problems we as developers face.

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  328. Take care of yourself first.... by msoftsucks · · Score: 1

    Companies today don't give a rat's ass about you. All they want is a bunch of robots paying them as little as possible. Everyone is replaceable. If you understand that and embrace it, you can always have the last laugh. Before you leave make sure you have something lined up to go to. As soon as you start at your new job, decide how long you want to stay there (3,4,5 years), and what kind of position you would want at that time. Never stay at a company for more than 6 years. During the time you're at the new job, study,read, and learn what it takes to be able to perform that new position. If the company offers training, great, but don't rely on them 100%. It's your responsibility to improve yourself. Once the time limit has been reached, if you haven't been promoted to the position you've been planning , go on a job hunt again. I once made the mistake of staying 8 years with a company. In the end, the company screwed me over, and I had to take a pay cut and a lower position just to get a new job.

    Also, become more active politically. Write to your congressman about getting these excemptions to the labor laws reversed.Join organizations like (http://www.cdt.org/),(http://www.acm.org),(http:/ /www.cpsr.org),(http://www.eff.org) . Laws against us have been passed because we aren't political enough. Look at UCITA. Vendors tried to screw us over one more time. We became organized, and now we are in a stalemate. It's not dead yet, but its certaintly not being enacted on a grand scale.

    Unions are not an answer. They have their own adgendas and they kill and calcify whole industries once they take hold.

    --
    Quit playing Monopoly with Bill.
    Linux - of the people, by the people, and for the people.
  329. personal problems by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    A few of the replies point to "how others in the company that are not part of the quitting group might react".

    This is not the persons problem. In the end its just business. Its not personal at all. If someone else has a personal problem about an employee or group of employees leaving then its that individuals problem to sort out.

    You really have to look out for yourself.

  330. that is why I will never work for IBM again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuff said

  331. Well, of COURSE you would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I would run Imail on win32 before I would even dream of using sendmail(or variants) on *nix."

    Because you don't have a clue to set up sendmail.

    Hey, but I'll bet you know how to use TSE. That's the ticket.

    Loser.

    1. Re:Well, of COURSE you would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a thoughtful reply. Sendmail sucks ass. it has had more exploits than something like Imail. also, Imail lets you have your customers administer their own accounts, so as to relieve even more overhead from your standard server maintenance. Think of a real reply before calling me a loser. Oh, and know the background of someone before assuming they don't know something.

  332. Unions - Not a bunch of bull by rpi1995 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have to disagree with that statement. I also have to say that I used to agree with that statement. A trade union (electrician, plumber)is very useful, from both sides of the fence.

    From the worker, you have a job, get a decent wage, get training, and get placement. Good workers look for good companies. A good company will always have work and treat their employees well. Lazy louts will have a harder go of it, and will wind up on furlough (Laid off) more often.

    From the manager (my side) it's good too. If I hire a union electrician, he or she has to come with tools, and prepared and able to do a certain level of work. If this person cannot do that, I send them back. One of the big complaints about non-union work is a lack of training. And I've seen it happen. A guy shows up and says he's an electrician, but he barely knows how to change a light bulb, let alone install electric panels!

    And yes, a union electrician costs more, but the odds are you're going to get a better job out of a union shop. That said, there are non-union shops out there (especially away from the east coast, where there is less organized labor) that do great work. But even then a good shop is going to cost more because in the end, you get what you pay for.

    One last thing, this all pertains to more physical, blue collar work, construction and maintenance of data centers, not the programming and operation of the equipment in it.

    And no, I'm not in a union, but I use them. And I'm good at it!

    1. Re:Unions - Not a bunch of bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try getting into a Union unless you know somebody.
      It is impossible. I spent a fair amount of time trying to get into the electrician's union, they simply aren't opening their books for anyone right now. Even guys with connections.

      Good thing I found a great job and make 5x what I would have doing that shit.

      Union are bogus, bullshit, good ole boys clubs that fuck you out of every penny they can, while claiming to be on your side.

      Fuck that shit!

    2. Re:Unions - Not a bunch of bull by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's all well and good if you are contracting out a job to a Union firm, but if you have Union employees working for you, the union makes it very tough to furlough the bad ones.

      They also tend to always promote those with seniority rather than those who do good work. Generally unions are great for folks who don't like to work hard, but an eager capatalist worker gets the shaft. Unions are a great thing when the company is trying to shaft you, but all too often they cause more problems for the company and the employees than they solve.

    3. Re:Unions - Not a bunch of bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think unions are fine as long as most aspects of competition is maintained. Unionization is perfectly fine where there are not already protections that the law or nature of that profession/industry might already have. However, if the trade already has huge protections and caps, I think it should be illegal; have a trade association to represent you politically, but to gripe by workforce when such legal protections you asked for in the past blow up in your face is ridiculous.

      For example, plumbers, electricians, and other blue collar workers tend to compete against others in the field. While they may be unionized, they are frequently not in the same company. While I realize in the past that some union bodies put caps on the population of their workers (or rather ratio to work load/jobs), I don't see that so much in these trades where I am.

      In industry, it can be another matter. Autoworkers, food industry, e.g. Hershey foods, even teacher unions, I sometimes scratch my head. The demand to enter the industry itself is not restricted but the unions make it so (where I am, teachers are in great surplus; I realize that is not the case in all places (US)) but these unions tend to prevent new, adaptable workers from entering (worker monopoly almost). I don't really disagree with these unions, but sometimes their demands and actions are unreasonable and occasionally just outlandish. They frequently compare their salaries to executives and management, which is stupid, since to the common person, the union workers salaries are outlandish, and exec and management salaries almost all are considered ridiculous, so comparing one to the other really just undermines any effort the unions might have of appearing reasonable.

      But where I hate unionization is at the professional, post graduate level, e.g. doctors unionizing. Makes no sense. There is already built in cap in several areas of the profession--entry to medical school is limited due to certification of schools. Residency positions are often limited (but not always, esp. primary care). Fellowships, et al. are limited.

      They know this. They already use this to their economic advantage (which is fine). They get 6+ figure salaries by default (their salaries are fine); this coincides with their claims of long training (college, md, residency minimum). But again, they know all this; that's why they are already paid the big bucks. Control entry to a specialization, and the demand far outstrips supply of that service. And yet the profession continues to control entry into the field, often to the detriment (underserved areas such as rural and true inner city) of people they are suppose to help. And they still aren't happy? Give me a break.

      They are already represented by hordes of associations (AMA is the biggest but slowest). And they seem to misunderstand that they already, by nature of their restricted entry training and professional, control their market and industry.

      To me, this is like the RIAA or MPAA execs getting together and unionizing. wtf

      Personally, I'd rather the states lift the licensing BY NUMBER restrictions on MDs and academic institutions. Then if they want to unionize, fine.

    4. Re:Unions - Not a bunch of bull by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      If I hire a union electrician, he or she has to come with tools, and prepared and able to do a certain level of work.

      there is no way in hell that microsoft or any other software company on this planet would allow that.

      they would scream Software piracy so fast your head would spin. a programmer's tools are software apps.

      plus the nightmare if you say "bring your own hardware too" makes IT management complete and utter hell... steve has massive porn on his computer you you legally cant search, dave has a trojan horse on it that some script kiddie harasses your firewall and other servers with..

      sorry, not possible in the IT world. unless you can get EULA's and copyright thrown out... and we have a better chance of seeing God come down from heaven and rap with Eminem than that happening...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Unions - Not a bunch of bull by TrackDaddy · · Score: 1
      Ok, get over the "bring your own tools" part and the rest of the post was very good. Right now, MS certs, and those from many other vendors are laughed at by quite a few Uber-Geeks, and are frequently refered too as worthless. Supposedly, they are too easy to get and the results are inconsistent quality of work and a cheapening of the value of the certs. Fine. Let's help out ourselves and the employers. Let's start a trade union like the American Medical Association and require people "practicing" as Systems Engineers, IT Architects, Network Enginners, Programers, et al. to be certified through the trade group? Then the certifications might mean something, and those of you who know you are the greatest thing since sliced core memory won't have to pick up the slack for all your know nothing poser coworkers.

      In short, stop cursing the darkness, and light a candle. I have to wonder though. How many of the Slashdot regulars who scream about Unions promoting for senority instead of skill would actually pass the certifications? Are their arguments really "from the heart" or are they just a red herring becuase they are afraid of having to pass the scrutiny of their peers instead of being able to tell some non-tech manager about their 1337 sk1115?

      --
      Run! There's a lobster loose!
    6. Re:Unions - Not a bunch of bull by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      but it will never happen. Geeks, ESPICALLY programmers are not a solidarity type of crowd. It and software industries needed to start unionizing a few years ago, hell riding with one of the BIG unions would have given it some clout too... the AFLCIO would have gladly opened a IT/IS branch... but. the insane wages that some were getting blew everything up.. I dont care who you are no IT person on this planet is worth $200,000.00 a year. and no programmer is worth that either. IS and IT are not anything but technically skilled OFFICE JOBS. and until we realize that and get off our arses and become realistic.... there will be no IS or IT union that has any power/backbone.

      A union is only as good as it's members... and if you look at the tech crowd... we are a pretty sad bunch.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Unions - Not a bunch of bull by TrackDaddy · · Score: 1
      Sad, but true. I have to agree with you up to a point. But, whey not at least try? Why give up? The industry (and its' people) are starting to mature and what didn't work before, may work now.

      I will have to take exception to the "technically skilled OFFICE JOBS" about IS and IT though. Building and maintaining an IT infrastructure at a medum to large company goes way beyond the bounds of an "OFFICE JOB". In fact, unlike some other roles in an organiztion where I could pull in some compotent individuals and teach them the job in a week, the IT part of the business usually requires some senior people w/ 10+ years of experience and uauslly a 4+ year degree in the field. In short, an IT engineer might be able to do a VP's job w/ a little training. The VP would be useless in IT w/o 6 month OTJ and then they would be a VERY junior part of the group.

      Which brings up another point... w/o IT and Tech people most large businesses would GRIND TO A HALT. Ford, GM, Lockheed, AT&T coudn't function for a day w/o their IT staff. And I think that is part of the reason that, in general, most mgmt secretly (or in some cases, openly) hates techs. Whether they are IT engineers, programmers, or just they guy who manages the web site. They don't like 'em. They know they can't do that stuff themselves and they don't like being dependant on the "geeks".

      --
      Run! There's a lobster loose!
    8. Re:Unions - Not a bunch of bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You're wrong.
      If that software programmer makes a company millions of dollars a year with the code he writes, then he is worth company revenue he brings in * scaling factor which would be about 200k/year salary.

      Go work in a real industry like the financial world. Guys who can code software that makes people money (shitloads of money) get compensated for it. But most slashbot code monkeys are glorified HTML fags who think they are leet.

      Here's a clue, web design is ghey, and you have no "skillz." You need to learn to put on a suit and tie, comb your fucking hair, take regular baths and become a valuable technical asset to a company.

      All you 5/hr. gurus are worth 5 an hour if you're lucky.
      Some of us make damn good money, because we make people money and we know how to communicate and play nice with others.

    9. Re:Unions - Not a bunch of bull by snarfer · · Score: 1

      "But where I hate unionization is at the professional, post graduate level, e.g. doctors unionizing. Makes no sense."

      I guess you've never heard of HMOs.

    10. Re:Unions - Not a bunch of bull by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I think what you don't understand is that unions exist (or at least are created) due to situations where workers are exploited.

      Doctors make a lot of money, yes, and so do other professionals. But no matter how much money you make, you don't deserve to be worked for 100 hours a week, or forced to work 10 hour shifts without a single break. And, when you ask managment to change tactics that are unreasonable, no one deserves to be told to "do as you are told or get the hell out".

      That's all a union is supposed to do - it allows the workers to call management's bluff and "get the hell out". With that balance in place, management and employees can then they to figure out the problems and fix them. It really doesn't have anything to do with salary or job position.

      Of course, I know that not all unions work like this. Most of the demands I hear about from older unions are pretty crazy. But some newer groups - like the interns at a northeast hospital that were being made to work 30+ hour shifts for no pay, or the flight attendants that just wanted one 15 minute break in their 10 hour shift so they could sit down or use the bathroom once - those sound like reasonable requests.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    11. Re:Unions - Not a bunch of bull by pyite · · Score: 1

      Haha, RIGHT. If *if* you get a skilled Union worker, they will show up between 10 and 11 throwing every excuse at you, take an hour lunch at 1, leave at 3, and charge you for 7-5. The only good construction union that I've seen is steel workers. And that's because all the ones I've seen were ex-Marines who had work ethic and a wanting to do a good job.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  333. Unions suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you are an average professional, in which case negotiating bigger paycheck via blackmail is *the* only way.

  334. Here's a lesson you may have forgotton: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And we wouldn't have believed the (verbal) assurances the larger company gave us regarding our soon-to-be contract with them."

  335. that's pretty nieve by Brigadier · · Score: 3, Informative



    I worked for a 4 man tech support crew once .. you heard me 4 man, well two women included. The company was an international sign and graphics firm. we were averaging about 30 calls resolved a day with a call queue that went up to 200 at some points. well we griped moaned complained. I even had a chance to talk one on one with some VP's. The result .... the manager installed a scrolling counter that showed who was taking the most calls. the result instead of taking the time to answer custumer questions you woudl tell them to reboo then call back. I've long since left the company and am quite happy in my new job. my cronies who I once plotted with are still working watching the score board. My advice is find a new job, there are many companies out there that will treat you like gold.

  336. Are you sure you read the whole story? by tmoertel · · Score: 1
    The tactic of walk-out is as old as the labor movement and is a valid response to unreasonable demands from management.... A 'strike' is a valid tool.... It is not unprofessional to go on 'strike', it is a right.... Unions are just as relevant today as they were in the 30's.
    Two questions:

    First, did you read the whole story?

    The reason I ask is because the original poster made it clear that this was not a collective bargaining situation. This is not a strike. This is not a walk-out. They are not trying to gain anything from the company. They don't want better pay. They don't want better hours. Rather, they want to leave -- for good -- in a way calculated to inflict maximum harm.

    Surely, you can see the difference. Right?

    Second, are you replying to my response, or some imagined anti-union rant?

    The reason I ask is because my response doesn't suggest that the employees shouldn't walk out together, nor does it suggest that they throw away their right to act collectively. It says, rather, that if they do walk out, they should do it as professionals.

    Given that they are leaving for good, they have no desire to shock the company into a better bargaining position by an immediate walk-out. Therefore, the only thing the employees could possibly have gained by leaving without notice is the momentary satisfaction of having taken revenge on their employer. As I pointed out, this satisfaction isn't worth the damage it would cause to their reputations.

  337. I've walked out before by theCat · · Score: 1

    But you know what...I always had my own reasons and when I made my decision it was thoughtfully, personally, and irrevocably. And it wasn't just because of what someone else did, or I thought they did. When my nerves get frayed then I start to assume that something else about the job is bugging me too. Maybe the orgainization has no future, maybe I have no future within it, maybe others are being abused and I don't like it, maybe I'm underutilized. You gotta go with your instincts, and when your instincts say "go!" you gotta run

    Sure jobs can be crappy. If you think about it, that is part of the definition of "work" (ie, not many people get paid to do their hobby.) So you show up every morning expecting crap, and there it is in a big steaming pile. Especially in the technology industry where it is such a Wild West show. Right now, my current company is shrinking though we have probably reached the bottom. We added a new account. Too many people have left so now I work some ungodly hours juggling probably too many chainsaws until my very soul becomes weary...but the "work" is not impossible and I can do some interesting hacks now and again. Money for my hobby at that point. Obviously I have enough discretionary time to surf /. ! I am generally respected by management. They have been tough but polite. I feel like I know what is going on, and what is required to get this flying heap off the runway.

    Am I about to leave? No way. Could I be made to leave? Hmm....I suppose. But I don't sense that kind of pressure coming on. My instincts say "tough it out a while."

    Someone will say I am working for a winner company right now and to stay the course. That is probably correct. That could also change. I will read the signs and move when I need to. But if I do it will be, as always, for my own reasons.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  338. Work to rule! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should reread your contract on worktimes, overtime and pay. Then have a chat with your coworkers. Here are some things to suggest, in no particular order.

    1) Make the bosses fire you, don't leave of your own accord. Compensation packages and all that.
    2) Do only the work you get paid for. If there is no compensation offered for overtime and on-call, overtime and on-call don't happen.
    3) Update your CVs (You will be leaving, but on your own terms).
    4) When you are planning and scheduling for projects, ask for quite a bit more time than you'll really need. Management will probably cut the time allowance but at least the situation improved from 'slave-driven' to 'overworked'.
    5) Check (or have a lawyer check) state/local laws on (maximum) worktimes and pay. Things like no-pay overtime and no-pay mandatory on-call don't seem entirely kosher. Collectively blow the whistle if need be. Employer retaliation (e.g. firing) is a VERY serious no-no.
    6) Write a collective letter of grievance to (senior) management. In it, politely and correctly state any and all grievances you and your coworkers have. Do NOT threaten a walkout (see 1). You may want a lawyer to doublecheck you on this. Have everyone sign multiple copies and have at least one dated by a notary. Send copies to HR, your immediate boss and individually to every board member.
    7) Keep copies of (official) memo's and directives on working times and conditions. If you can, get copies of 'historical' documents as well. Keep the file and a paper backup of it at home.

    The really important thing is collective action. Everyone has in on this and be kept in on this!

    Good luck,
    Sysmangler at Large

    1. Re:Work to rule! by SumDog · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good set of ideas. The only thing I'm concerned about is that most employers who value you will give you a chance to "resign" before they "fire" you. I always assumed it was better for everyone if you chose to resign and you'd keep your good recomendation. I've also heard about laws in certain states (such as Tennessee) which state that an employer can never give you a "bad" reference. They can either give you a good reference or no reference at all. That may just be an urban legond. Checking with a lawyer is also a very wise move.

      Sumit

  339. Levels of Acceptable Risk by duck_prime · · Score: 1
    If you want to get ahead and call the shots and not get treated like dirt...take the risk and strike out on your own. You may fail, but you will never succeed working for somebody else....
    What you're saying is true, and good advice, but is not the whole story. Based on life circumstance, a worker may have a different level of risk-tolerance. F'rinstance ... say you have two children and a homemaker wife. You want to be a lot more careful about your personal safety net than a bachelor with milk-crate furniture. You could make the argument that your duty to them -- keeping them fed & housed & happy -- is more important than going for the brass ring. The potential payoff is lower, but more certain.

    Okay, so you do want to strike out on your own anyway. To create a business, or become a contractor. Still possible, but you have to prepare much more thoroughly ... how many months worth of income do you have stashed away? Have you lined up your financing/contract/peruvian grower ahead of time? Maybe Mrs. gets a job to pad the cushion account (there's a breakeven point where the new job's income balances the extra expense of daycare, business clothing, etc).

    Actually, the best advice I can give to someone in that situation is the advice I would give to anyone: buy and read "The Millionaire Next Door". Or save the dough and listen to my summary: Live not within but WELL BELOW your means. Take the leftover capital, and accumulate it. That's why we call it Capitalism, baby!

    Okay, now you have your huge stash of money. Now you can become a contractor, or start your business, or invest the cash in muni bonds.

    Happy?
    1. Re:Levels of Acceptable Risk by aonifer · · Score: 1
      Actually, the best advice I can give to someone in that situation is the advice I would give to anyone: buy and read "The Millionaire Next Door".

      Actually, the best advice would be to borrow and read "The Millionaire Next Door".

  340. say it like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo, if your boss is a S-O-B
    Tell him to S-H-O-V-E the J-O-B
    Put your middle finger up slowly
    Put it close enough to his face so he can examine it closely
    Say I ain't workin here no more
    Who do you think you are?
    Rip your apron off, throw it on the floor
    Run to the door, to the payphone
    Make a toll-free call
    Tell your spouse what happened and where you are
    So they can come and get you in the car later on
    And help you search for a new 9 to 5 job
    If the unemployment line ain't that long
    You can take your time printin out W-9 forms
    Eventually, you'll get on if you try hard enough
    And you'll get money if you keep punchin your time card enough
    Maybe you hate it, maybe you love it
    But if you hate it all you gotta do is get mad and tell the boss to

    [Biz Markie]
    Take this job and shove it
    I ain't workin here no more
    Take this job and shove it
    I ain't workin here no more
    Take this job and shove it
    I ain't workin here no more
    Take this job, take this job, take this job and shove it

  341. Age-old solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Quit enmass.
    2. Start a company providing the services your department provided.
    3. Offer those services to your former company and other companies as well.
    4. Profit!

    1. Re:Age-old solution: by MrPink2U · · Score: 1

      There is 1 problem with this solution. The problem is the belief that you are not replacable. Bottom line, everyone is replacable.

      Get over it. You are not special. IT is not a mystery any more. There are TONS of unemployed, overqualified people looking for jobs right now that could come up to speed as your replacement in no time.

  342. Fell thru by tstiehm · · Score: 1

    I tried organizing something like this, it fell thru and management found out. The company sucked before and sucked more afterward.

    All those that said leave, left on their own within six months (including me), all those that said hang in stayed more than a year and some multiple years. And now 7 years later, I don't talk to any of those people, I left things well with most of them but I moved on and lost track of them.

    Let me give you a clue, it is about you, so stop worrying about what others think. Don't quit until you have a new job, then give two week notice. Nothing you do will make a point, nothing you do will make the powers that be see your point. Live your life for you and do the best for yourself.

  343. Yup, I did this once. by gricholson75 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but then Reagan fired us all. Bastard.

  344. I did this many years ago! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was working for a long ago defunct computer company called Entre computers (in the 80's). Over a year period, the owner milked the company dry to make the numbers look go so he could sell it. The buyer lied to everyone about pay and position until the day he signed the paperwork, and then told everyone that they whould have to reapply for their positions (and pay). That evening, the entire staff met at a pizza joint and decided to quit. The next day all of us walked in and some of us took hardware equil to the amount we had been stiffed in pay. We then told the acting manager we were all quitting (the owner was on a business trip).

    I'll never forget that fat consertave looser in a business suit begging me on the phone to return to work (his groveling brought me great joy!). I said no thanks, and wished him bad luck. Entre computers in Towsand MD folded the next month, after the new owner realized the company had been bilked (he never asked any of the employees, we all new what was going on). So much for suits and their power over us.

    I still remember this very clearly. I have never assumed since then that anyone from any company I have worked for is any better than me, or has any power over me.

  345. Negotiation is the Key by Ridgelift · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Best time I ever spent was listening to a series on negotiation (I happen to listen to this guy on the subject of power negotiating

    The real issue is not whether to leave or not, but rather to negotiate with the bosses to get the respect and working conditions you want. There's lot of "gambits" you can use like good-guy/bad-guy, higher authority, nibbling and a host of other tactics

    For example. the company I'm currently working at desperately needed some fixes to their commercial accounting system. Rather than say "Yeah I can help you" I phrased it as "I might be able to help you, but what are you going to do for me?". Two weeks later I'm sitting in my own office with a $4500.00 PC and a 22" monitor using only Linux - a dream job!

    If geeks would learn some basic negotiating skills, Linux would eventually rule, the world would be a better place, and we'd all make more money. (Don't believe me? Talk to an accomplished salesman)

  346. Re:do it! walkout! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, easily replaceable if you can speak Spanish.

    Seriously, I worked fast food for years, and there was a chronic shortage of employees. Sad, when you consider how many people would rather spend their time telemarketing.

  347. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let me guess....macromedia ? the coldfusion or dreamweaver teams ?

  348. If you don't like your job..... by echucker · · Score: 1

    ... you don't strike - you just go in every day and do it really half-assed. That's the American way!

    -Homer J. Simpson

  349. Pay Cut by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Volunteer for a big paycut rather than work 80 hours/wk. The economy for cubicle dwellers is really nasty right now. Everybody is firing, not hiring. You can't be choosey. Volunteer for a big pay cut.

  350. Go work for somebody else! by karlandtanya · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Couple of notes to keep in mind:

    In this market, be grateful you got a job.

    NEVER quit job "A" until you have job "B" lined up! NEVER.

    If you want to try strong-arm tactics against your employer, form a union.


    A couple things follow:

    If you can't come up with job "B", that means that you should probably keep working at job "A" and deal with it as best you can. Work slowdowns and other means of "giving management the finger" may make you feel good for the moment. Don't screw yourself.

    If you can't get enough support from your co-workers to form a union, that's a pretty good indicator that your brilliant plan to "show management whose boss" is going to fail.


    An note to employers here: Loyalty flows both ways. If you're screwing your employees, you can be sure they are going to screw you back. And you, as the employer, have to be the first to show respect. Most employers would prefer to use manipulation and intimidation than respect. Fact is, intimidation is a better short-term solution.


    I must say this comes from a voice of experience. I left my previous job mainly because I did not respect my boss. I will not iterate his shortcomings here; just say that he did not meet my criteria for respect. I hired on with another (much smaller) company whose leader I did (and do) respect.


    In tough economic times, the company I work for has had to cut back on some benefits simply because the money was not there. Some employees would have dragged out their offer of employment and cried "FOUL". No. Most employers will give you some song and dance about "we have to face reality her...we are no longer able to..." Fine, that's probably true. But when economics improve, does management restore vacations? Benefits? My boss did.. When money got even tighter, the management cut salaries, too. Their own salaries, that is. And that means president, veep, etc. Not "project managers", etc. The people with the power to make the cuts cut themselves first.


    Listen up, bosses reading this: This is respect. All of these "Who Cut My Cheese" books won't tell you the simple truth: "If you take care of your people, they will take care of you". And if you screw them, don't expect any better back.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  351. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best advice I've seen so far... although if the management IS against the troops it is best to learn that early. I was in a situation once where the management knew about 9 months in advance that they were going to be bought out by a competitor. The competitor told them (roughly) "We want to pay for redundancies (layoff remuneration) on as few of your workers as possible when we buy you out. So for each worker you can aggravate enough that they will quit (and forfeit the $$) we will give you a nice comfy bonus."

  352. Write a letter by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    Don't walk out w/o money 6 months' savings account. It would be foolish and the job market as it is, makes it hard to find employment.
    As some people pointed out earlier, your work colleagues may turn out to be your worst enemy when you try to walk/protest.

    I suggest writing a carefull (read: diplomatic) letter listing your demands and why you need them met (i.e. long hours & no compensation cannot continue). Do not write an e-mail - they are easily deleted from computers and servers.

    Other reasons:
    1) It makes a paper record. By sending carbon copies to your manager all the way to the CEO they will have to acknowledge that the issue was brought up and how it was approached.

    2) Paper is always good for the courts - if it has to go that far either for wrongful dismissal suit and/or to get unpaid monies after being fired.

    3) By writing the letter first, you don't have to rely on having your colleagues to physically approach the boss or manager with you. Have them sign the letter. If they refuse, destroying the letter is easy. By signing, you have physical proof the they are backing you up rather. They won't have a chance of chickening out if you approach the management instead.

  353. Prepared for the Flamebait mod! by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

    Sounds an awful lot like a Union :-)

  354. Rose-colored glasses by jtheory · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Talk about a major case of rose colored glasses. When these wonderful managers mismanage the company into the ground, then ask me to clean up their mess, should I?

    Ah, that cursed optimism of mine. Just can't shake it.

    The funny thing is, though -- it can work. If you just scheme against management, they will know it and not feel any compunction at all about giving you the boot.

    If you try to work with them (and yes, maybe help them clean up the mess, but also help them prevent it from happening again), it might not work (and you can usually figure out pretty early on if it's failing, and bail before you get yourself into trouble!) ... but then again, it might.

    There are companies where the intelligent, considerate but persistent person can really get ahead. There are companies where s/he doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell. Start slowly to find out where you are... and if you're the snowball-in-hell, you can either start stabbing backs and scrabbling, or just lay low, wait out the poor economy, and move on when you can.

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  355. MOD PARENT UP! This is a more realistic view ... by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

    Computer science Masters, business degree 5 years experience, 4 programming languages, 3 foreign languages and 15,000GBP a year ($20,000).

    A change in the way employees negotiate with employers is long overdue.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
  356. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There is no "company", a single malevolent entity that is treating you like dirt."

    Then what signs the checks and makes the contracts? In the end, there is an organization that is entirely under the authority of perhaps 3 or 4 people who seldom, in this situation, directly respond to individual employees.

    "Feelings, huh? You don't know what's going on or why, but you have these feelings?"

    When one has worked at a firm for a year or more, ones feelings are usually based on a great deal of experience. If the feeling is there's not going to be any response, likely that's the case.

  357. Walkout Fever by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A startup I was working for about 4, 5 years ago was doing fairly good business, but ended up having some pretty bad cashflow problems (collection sucked). When some of the sales guys and one of the IT guys wanted to know what the plan was for commissions compensation (understanding that there was no cash on hand, but having a plan in place), and management gave us nothing in the way of a plan, and in the case of the IT guy absolved themselves of their debt, we staged a walkout.

    The IT guy (my best friend) quit immediately. One of the other programmers had quit the day before. I quit but offered to stay onboard and transition a few projects (out of the goodness of my heart - assholes be damned). I got walked out the door. Two of my friends who were in marketing but were not seriously considering a walk-out were bounced out the door a week later with a month's severance and leftover vacation time. Definite house-cleaning.

    The company deserved to lose us. They are doing fantastic 4 years later, so I know we didn't hurt them (not that I cared), but I hope at least they got the fucking point.

    -Chris

  358. I don't agree... by emil · · Score: 2, Informative

    A previous employer liked to give out $10k hiring bonuses that had to be repaid if you left before a set time (my case was two years).

    We had several people who left the day of the expiration, with less than on week's warning.

    I casually let slip that I would be renting out my house six months before my date was up.

    This employer has a few bad things to say about me, but they have admitted that my departure was cleaner than the others because it was expected.

    Time limits on sign-on bonuses plus a bad work environment always equals a mutually-agreed termination date.

  359. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by rmayes100 · · Score: 1

    That's because without the first three (the board, the shareholders, the customers) there won't be any employees. The worst thing you will ever have the opportunity to do as a manager is to look someone in the eye and tell them they have two weeks or to go clean out their desk...it's an unfortunate situation but as the post that started this thread pointed out it's not some mindless entity making these decisions, it's people. And many of these people making these decisions are probably laying awake every night trying to figure out how they're going to make it through another week without laying off any more people.

    This makes the parent post even more relevant, as an employee you stand the best shot of resolving issues like this by being as open and honest about your needs with your employer as you can. At the same time the company can return the favor by being as open and honest with it's employees as possible. One of the best work experiences I had was working for a failing company that was very honest with it's employees. Nearly everyday we'd have these company-wide meetings with the CEO and he'd lay everything out for everyone...many of those meetings went something like: "We have enough funding to carry us for 4 weeks as is, if we make some changes we can extend that out x weeks...here's our options...". At least in those situations everyone knows exactly what's going on and everyone can make educated decisions about where they stand within that company and whether or not they'd better start making other plans for employment.

  360. Hiring and false economies by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

    I once walked out with a colleague over a payrise which was promised but never delivered. After advertising the posts and man hours of interviewing time, I heard later that the cost of rehiring was far more than the combined amounts we were denied.

    Bad business is full of false economies like this to "save face" for executives and middle managers.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
  361. A moment of thrill for months of regret... by dynamicfigure · · Score: 1

    Yea, convince the entire group to go, then when you have one of your coworkers with 3 kids and another on the way who is six months out of work, behind on his mortgage and starving because of your "idea" then you can see how good of an impulse this is. I work in recruiting and staffing and can say for a fact that NOBODY in an organization (this even goes for an entire group) is irreplaceable. Many premadonas think they are, but with the market the way it is there are more than a few starving IT professionals out there who will take anything right now, including your job. I have met more talented folks than I can count in the last 12 months who have been out of work for along time... and the way things looking are I don't see alot of them getting back into it any time soon. So yea, go ahead and create a mass exodus. You won't get unemployment if you walk out (nomatter the reason), because you quit. Afterwards, you and your friends can learn what it feels like to have more month than money, and talk to recruiters who will keep telling you nothing is available, but to âoejust hang in there.â

    1. Re:A moment of thrill for months of regret... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I work in recruiting and staffing and can say for a fact that NOBODY in an organization (this even goes for an entire group) is irreplaceable.

      Of course it seems that way to you. They must all just be warm bodies, huh? Judging from the terminology you use you probably lump a top notch computer scientist and software designer in with the system administrators and programmers in that single "IT" category too. I'd hate to be a manager that had to hire engineers through your department.

      Sure, technically you're correct. You can always replace the entire team, however irreplaceable has a different meaning in business context that in the dictionary. Irreplaceable means that you can't replace that person without unjustifiable costs. There are many engineering organizations that would be better off closing up shop than trying to start over if they lost a few specific people. For all practical purposes, those people are irreplacable.

      If you treat all you employees as equal "human resources" you're potentially doing your company great harm. Unless your company is gigantic there's a good chance that there is somebody in your organization you would be much better off trying to keep around than treating as just another resource that can be replaced if he/she quits.

  362. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Life2Short · · Score: 1

    According to this link: http://www.cbpp.org/9-24-02pov.htm the median FAMILY income in 2001 was $42K. Keep in mind that this is based on family household data, not individual incomes. Also remember that medians are not as sensitive to extreme scores (some person making 20 million dollars) the way averages are.

  363. Be wary of the Phyrric victory by dancornell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have some experience with this type of situation because I founded a company that was acquired and stayed along as they did a extra-professional job of ruining the organization I had built with my original partners. All of our original employees and the great team we built up after the acquisition were extremely disappointed to find what was previously an excellent company to work for turn into a hell-on-earth mess.

    There are a couple of important things you might want to think about before having a mass walk-out at your current company:

    Why the mass walk out? Is it to "teach management a lesson" and make yourselves feel better? If so, you should probably realize that everyone is better served if the people who are dissatisfied simply find other jobs (or don't find jobs if they have enough cash to ride out some unemployment) and leave in an orderly fashion. Give your two weeks notice, go to your next job, and hopefully you'll find yourself in a better situation.

    Staging some sort of apocalyptic last battle that leaves the company IT department in shambles might be fun to fantasize about and possibly even fun to execute, but you really need to think about what actual benefits this will provide. Possibly some of the people who quit are now unemployed and under the gun to find something else. Possibly there are some people left behind in management who were actually all right folks who are now in a really hard position. Almost certainly anyone who is left behind to pick up the pieces isn't going to be a terribly useful reference for future work.

    In a situation like this it is key to determine what value there is in striking a "victory" against your old department. A Phyrric victory is a victory where so much damage has been done to all parties involved that is is hard to actually call the nominal winner a true victor. Adopting a scorched earth mentality might be a fun posture to adopt, but dealing with the consequences can be pretty unpleasant for _everyone_ involved.

    I had to sit around and watch the company I built go to hell. The smart people just found other jobs, said their goodbyes, and went on to bigger and better things - everyone stayed friends. Other people chose to sabotage the operation by sending employee lists to recruiters, complaining about things that weren't going to change, and just generally adding to an already terrible situation. These people all left or got laid off eventually, but they also destroyed a number of professional relationships that did not have to end with their attachment to the original company.

    In short, please leave your job if it sucks because life is too short to work at a shitty job (unless you're contractually required to stay like I was). However, take a moment to think about how you leave that job and be sure that your actions actually contribute to your long term happiness and professional development rather than just making you feel good when you tell The Man to take his job and suck it.

  364. A Road Map by cniebla · · Score: 2, Informative
    Based on the premise that you need to have a cash flow, there's a road map that you can always follow:

    First, it always help to know when the company has started the fsck plan as soon as possible. This will help you in to not getting yourself in trouble as you can when you start obeying the company to stay for long work shifts, or even 7x24, because once you start doing so it will very difficult to stop. It always pays to have friends on human resourses / finantial department to know when things happen.

    Second, you start searching for another job when all your coworkers use the extra work time to fall in the spiral of trouble. Of course, it will help when not only you, but all the department simply do not accept the new kind of rules, but unfunaterly this is not the case as you're reading Slashdot when the others are using compressed air to clean motherboards.

    Third, you can expect to be fired when this process (finding another job in your free time) is still in early stages, because other coworkers will even start to complain as you leave office early every day, among other causes. This is not as bad as it sounds: when the company fires you only because you're doing your job at the usual schedule it will pay you for that (legal affairs differs state to state or even country to country). When you leave voluntarily you receive a lot less (and you will if you find another job to jump in).

    Third, never use the company's network to search for another job (you can be fired early, even with no compensatory package, simply for using the company's assets for this purpose), this is NOT a smart move. Period.

    In the end, if everything is sincronized, you will find yourelf in another job, using the time the others spend jobless working for your current company, for less daily hours. This is the best case, of course, and demands you to be as reserved and confidential as you can. But hings could go wrong...

    Always get to know the law, as you can find what can happen, to be prepared (this could help you when you receive your last payment for your current company, for example).

    You can use some (of all) of your company's benefits (days you can work from your home, sickness, courses, even not showing at office with a limit) to go to job interviews.

    Keep in mind this: you will not be treated different because you're special, you know something the others know or youÂre to important for your company, if you fail to realize this you probably shouldn't reading this, it will help you more to use compressed air to service motherboards and cds. You have very little time to fly, maybe to a better possition ;)

    If it helps, once the company fires the unfirable staff, it starts a never-ending process of hiring new people, and as soon as this people finds what it's all about, resigns, to start it all over again, and again, and again...

    It's just a shame that there're some places where the finantial people are so dumb thay cannot say what costs more, or the company is so alienated with money that does'nt care for it most valuable asset: the people.

  365. Bad idea... by johnmearns · · Score: 1

    Don't forget too even if you make your point and are taken back in, it will be to finish whats on the table but your days are numbered. Most managers wouldn't keep someone around who's going to just walk out again when they're in a pinch. Work the time you're paid for and go home.

    --
    "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it." -Voltaire
  366. Check your reasons, then act by masonsas · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This does remind me a bit of something I was involved in at an earlier company. At the beginning of the 90s the small company (~20 people) I was at was sold, and a new president came in. He quickly showed us that his business ideas were crazy, and the company wasn't going to last long with him in place. So we wrote up a letter to the company board of directors, with every employee signing it, stating that unless they replaced him, we were all walking. We FedExed copies of the letter to every member of the board. They called a meeting, and within a few weeks we had a new company president.

    The key here is that we had specific complaints, specific solutions we wanted, reasons why those solutions were the right ones, and we also had sufficient numbers (well, the whole company) that they couldn't ignore the issue.

    Make sure that you know your reasons for taking action. Make sure that you've identified the core problems, and that you've all tried to address them with management directly.

    Then figure out what solutions you think will fix the problems. New managers? New company policies? What exactly would make your jobs enjoyable again, while still helping the company through its tough times?

    Lastly, be careful before you make specific threats (i.e. you do what we ask or we're gone). Unless you really don't care about the company at all, I assume you don't want to really threaten -- you just want to make sure that they know you feel strongly about the problems, and that you will have to take action. Make sure you do in fact have sufficient numbers and sufficiently important roles in the company to back up any threats of action that you do make. If you just look like a few cranks, nobody will take you seriously.

    But really, it comes down to looking as though you care, you want to work things out, and you just want to bring attention to the problems. Keep in mind that you're going to have to go over someone's head to reach people who can take action, and you may create some pretty bad feelings in the process. You may well end up making things worse, in fact, if you're not careful. But if you care about the job and the company, and you really think things are intolerable now, and you've made reasonable efforts talking to people one on one about the problems...well, then it's certainly time to do something about it.

  367. How about... by jdehnert · · Score: 1

    Tap everyone in the office for headhunter contacts and quietly get the word out that there is a whole group of X engineers who developed Y that want to move to another company.

    Depending on what you do, there may be someone out there ready to hire the whole lot of you. While less likley that it was about 3 or 4 years ago it's still a possibility IF what you do as a group is in demand and IF you creating first rate work in that field.

    --
    Eschew Obfuscation
  368. Been there, done that.... by Twitchy+Itchy+Poo · · Score: 1

    Got shown the door faster than you can say, "Dorf on Golf". I'd rather leave on good terms than walk out on a job ever again.

  369. Let's not be too full of ourselves by F452 · · Score: 1

    People are always talking about how much a company will be hurting if/when they leave, but in reality, life goes on. Companies go on. Some of the people left behind may suffer a little more for a while, but then equilibrium sets in again. At least in larger companies.

  370. Simple Solution by cre8tor · · Score: 1

    Work as an exterminator or get a job in the funeral business.

    Indefinite job security.

  371. consulting consulting..... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    With all these stories about people quitting to start their own "consultant company", no wonder there is a glut of small consulting companies.

  372. Cool down. Seriously. by Doctor+Hu · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Unsurprisingly, given the question, there's a lot of noise even at +4. So, a few basic suggestions:
    1. If you haven't yet done so, read your terms and conditions of employment, including the small print. Pay especial attention to procedures laid down for handling employee grievances, and disciplinary issues, and over what activities may constitute grounds for disciplinary actions.
    2. Give your local managers the chance to recognise that they have a problem and to make a sincere attempt to resolve it before moving to the grievance stage.
    3. Keep a written record of these discussions - make a summary at the end of meetings and indicate to the people you're talking with what you consider were the important points and what you understand to have been agreed (or not) on each side.
    4. Don't indulge in wishful thinking on a matter as important as this. As others have already noted, it's easy to believe that you're more vital to the enterprise than you actually are, and there's the unpleasant possibility that even if everyone who's unhappy acts responsibly you'll still be identified as trouble-makers and find yourselves looking for other work. I'm not saying that you should wimp out and let yourselves be shafted because of the current state of the job market, only that you are realistic about the situation.
    Good luck, anyway.
  373. I've done this twice by SlapAyoda · · Score: 1

    I've done this at two former employers.

    The result at the first one:
    Company, out of business.
    Me, out of job (8 months or so).

    The result at the second one:
    Company has to scamble to keep things together.
    Me, out of job (5 months or so).

    Though, in both cases it was a situation I felt like I had no choice, regardless of the outcome. If you feel like it's something you gotta do, go ahead and do it.

    --
    # wrote sig.txt, 23 lines, 31337 chars
  374. You have rights by falsification · · Score: 1

    You have rights under the law. Consult a licensed attorney. You should look for one who focuses on employment and labor issues.

  375. Parent shows why you should see a lawyer *first* by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lawyer with actual experience in intellectual property, NDA and trade secret cases can advise you about important prep work before you leave that will give you partial protection. There's apparently no such thing as complete protection.

    Take this seriously, folks. Not every employer makes rational decisions about litigation.

  376. HOMEACCOUNT software company in Charleston, SC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bunch of the remaining developers (who had survived a couple of rounds of layoffs) became upset at what had happened to the founder (he was escorted from the building by the people he had sold the concern to, with a police officer [totally unnecessary]) The surviving employees talked to a group of the layed off, gathered forces, put themselves on E-Bay (check the news around October of 2000) as a 'fully functional e-commerce team' and AllTel opened an office in downtown Charleston and snapped them all up, especially the ones who voluntarily left HOMEACCOUNT, and everybody got to work on the Spectrum project. Moral of the story, business is business, but companies are still made of people and people deserve to be treated with dignity and respect no matter what your financial situation is.

  377. Get a job as a Slashdot editor... by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    ...just involves randomly click on stories to approve and not much else...you don't even have to check for duplicates. And, boy, does it get you some classy women too! ;-)

    -psy

  378. We did .... by taniwha · · Score: 1
    Many years ago I worked for a company that was moving to a new office (a good thing) - it was at the end of a terrible commute, rather than no commute ( a bad thing), it was on top of an old oil tank farm and was going to get the air-humidifier's water from ground water (a really bad thing).

    We let our misgivings be known ... but I think the thing we did that really help0ed was we all updated our resumes, printed them out and left them on the laser printer for a day ....

  379. Where I worked, Mgt did pay attention !!! by COredneck · · Score: 1

    I will bite on this !

    The company I worked for 5 years was a mid-size company with Corp. HQ in Indpls, IN and 6 "factories" in different states. There were about 400 employees. The IT group I worked in was very close knit with about 6 people. We knew each other pretty well and go to each other's houses for different socail things on weekends. This was my first job after college and all the groups I worked in ever since were not close knit like this job.

    Around my 3rd year in the company and with the job market improving (1993), we had our annual review with the VP of Finance. The previous year, we worked our asses off to get a project done on time even with the unreasonable deadlines imposed by executive management. During our performance evaluations, each of us took turns with our boss and the VP and each of us got something like $1000 or $2000 pay raise and she made up excuses (downgrade our performance review) why we are not making more money. There was alot of grumbling within the ranks and a different executive overheard the comments and went to the owner of the company. Also, one of the top people left for a different job with a good jump in pay.

    The owner of the company knew how to walk the fine line on compensation. He paid people enough money especially in the factories to where they didn't desire to unionize. The people (except executive mgt) in Corp. HQ made less money than the plant workers. The owner was cheap in paying the white collar people money.

    The owner knew if IT people are unhappy, there would be problems with the company systems so he called the labor lawyer in NYC and he came out to Indiana to have confidential discussions with each person in the IT group. He would then present a report to the owner. The owner also sent the VP of Finance on a long vacation since a lot of people were pissed at (not only our group but also accounting since she meddled in their affairs).

    After it was said and done, most of us got pay raises that were significant. Mine jumped up $5000. Within a year, I left the company to take a job in Colorado with a double in pay which was 1995.

    In 1998, the company was sold to a large corporation and the owner got a good golden parachute with a no-compete clause. He owns similar businesses today and is expanding out quickly but how he paid his white collar people, I would not work for him again.

    Also when I worked for that company, we had a strict dress code to where if you went on a business trip on a Sunday, you had to dress up even on Sunday to travel. Vacation time was also a premium. Cannot carry over from year to year and your first year in the company, you did not get vacation time and the following three years, you only got a week ! An additional note on the VP of Finance, on the dress code, she did not allow us to participate on dress down Friday while the rest of Corp. HQ could wear jeans. She was a snak

  380. to quote a great man... by BubbaTheBarbarian · · Score: 1

    Homer once said "Do your job half-assed. That is the american way!" Truer words were never spoken.

    Rather then walk out, pull a wally and get a comp pakcage. Sleep under your desk like I did for a month. That really gets to them.

    1. Re:to quote a great man... by redwoodtree · · Score: 1

      You're the type of person that makes the lives of the rest of us a living hell. Who do you think picks up the slack when people like you doze off?

      This is what I don't understand about corporate america, reward the losers. During the first round of layoffs at my company all the useless people got laid off and got 6 months severance while the rest of us got more work load.

      Why not try to make your situation better , why not stand up and do a decent days work for a decent day's pay. Bastard!!!!!

  381. We did that at one place I used to work at... by Zarf · · Score: 1

    and we all were unemployed for a while.

    I suppose that's the big "outcome" of doing what you suggested. Back at the old company they had to hire a bunch of new people whom (I assume) they paid less than they had paid us. Nobody knows what happened after that because we all had quit.

    I hope I've helped to shed some light on situations like this for you... nobody really wins or loses in these kinds of situations.

    --
    [signature]
  382. flex time? by nxs212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Walking out is dumb especially when you consider crappy economy, number of foreign workers who ARE willing to work for less and put in more hours.
    Back in the IPO-crazy days people had no problems working 70, 80-hour weeks. Now that we are back to reality, why do you ask for something that you will never get back - time. Time that you could have spent with your family, friends, etc. is worth more (to me) than extra 10k that you can probably squeeze out of the Co.
    Why don't you negotiate flex time schedule for ALL IT people in your group.
    Either ask for more vacation time or Summer Hours schedule where you get to leave earlier on Fridays, like 1 or 2pm. If they won't give you more money, the least they can do is give you more vacation time and more personal days.

  383. One refinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is good advice. Your resignation letter should also contain pro forma regret. You can do that and remain sincere. "Regrettably" sounds polite; nobody can use it against you later; and it's business code for "I won't give you any chance to paint me as the one who was the problem, but FUCK you!"

  384. Unions by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    Just like IT guys to reinvent the wheel.

    Folks, this is what UNIONS are all about. Don't like how the employer is treating you? Your colleagues feel the same? Form a Union or form a chapter of some larger union (e.g. Communication Workers of America).

    A "mass departmental exodus" will get you fired -- whether that's self-desctructive for the company or not. A strike, on the other hand, has lots of law and precedent behind it as long as you follow the time-honored formulas. In some states, companies actually can't fire striking workers!

    Perhaps more important, your company's CEO knows what a strike is. He learned about it in school when he earned his MBA, and he knows the formulas he's supposed to use to bargain with a union when one pops up in front of him.

    Don't have strong enough convictions about the matter to accept the problems associated with unions? Then shut up get back to work.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  385. Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You like your job, it provides great satisfaction. Suddenly, the company realizes its in deep financial shit, and starts making cut backs. This impacts the department. You suddenly find yourself working 50-60 hour weeks, put on call with no compensation, given unreasonable amounts of work and generally treated like dirt.
    All I have to say is GET A LIFE! Welcome to the REAL WORLD. If you don't like your job. Get over it! Find another one! If you don't like working for someone else. Then get some balls and some capital and work on a startup. Boo hoo. you work too much, your underpaid, they took away your free time, ohh know you can't spend half the day reading slashdot.. Oh wait.. they cut your t-3 connection and firewalled your as$. Now you can download all that Pr0n. Why not be the person that stands out. That steps up to improve things, and not walk out on your problems. That is what spearates those that are and those that are not!!!!! end \dev\null
  386. One of three choices by crivens · · Score: 1

    Given the state of the market and the fact that I'm unemployed, you do one of three things:

    1) Put up and shut up
    2) Talk to management
    3) Quit

    Simple

  387. Make sure you have somewhere else to go FIRST by crovira · · Score: 1

    I've had the pleasure of such phyric "career changes" in the past when I couldn't tale how "stoopud" or "ignurnt" the analysts or upper management were.

    I went from calamity to disaster always leaving a few weeks before the hand-writing was on the wall for the companies or the departments or the projects involved. Shit happens but it wasn't happening to me.

    The last time, I actually waited for the manager to offer me my head on a plate and JUMPED at the opportunity to not let the door hit me in the ass on the way out. That bit of grand-standing saved my life (I worked on the 83rd floor at the WTC and lived next door,) but I ended up not working for a year. (Okay I must admit, I was rattled and worth shit for several months after my lucky escape. I slacked off and burnt through my 401k. But I was ALIVE. :-)

    Now I'm going employed again but I'm going back to school and looking for a better job NOT doing software development.

    Life is good.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  388. Finances are the hardest by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've had problems with my job working for a large company that's well known locally. I was seriously thinking of jumping ship, writing a scathing manifesto of the problems in my position and with my supervisors, and then looking for employ elsewhere. But since I don't have a job lined up to go into, I needed to get my finances in order to make such a leap.

    I'm not good at saving and since my ex got the house in our breakup I don't have equity in much of anything that doesn't rapidly depreciate (car/computers).

    I take at least 10% of my post-tax net pay and consider that off-limits. It goes immediately into long term retirement savings. This is above and beyond my 401K contributions. If I'm out of work I won't be contributing to long term savings so this is to fill that hole, but I found I had to take this out of my pocket first or I just couldn't learn to save it.

    I cut my monthly expenses (rent, internet access, etc) from 40% to 30% of my net pay. No cable. One phone line. Do without heat or AC except in emergencies. The 10% saved went into paying off my credit cards and now goes into unplanned expenses. This also helps me become less dependent on those nice but unnecessary comforts so I won't miss them when I must cut to the bone.

    I've started really being a tightwad about daily and spontaneous expenditures. This was where my biggest waste was. I now allocate only 10% of my net pay to food, gas, and these day to day consumables. If I have money left from this, I allow myself use it on computer books, dining out, and other spur of the moment luxuries. It makes it a very powerful incentive to save, but it was the hardest to get used to.

    25% of my net goes to unplanned expenses. Car repair. Unplanned doctor visits. Rent and insurance price hikes. Stuff like that. This isn't to be used spontaneously, but it's not realistic for me to consider it "savings". Things will and have come up that have wiped out this pot of money and then some. But once or twice the pot has grown to more than $2K at which point I funnel the excess into savings.

    The final 25% goes one of three places:
    1. A kitty to pay expenses for eight months.
    2. A pre-planned large purchase.
    3. Long term savings.

    The eight month expense kitty is a must have even if I wasn't considering quitting. I might get fired or laid off tomorrow so this is the biggest need.
    The pre-planned large purchase is for something I need like a new car downpayment, a necessary computer upgrade, a training class, or a big birthday present for my dad's birthday. I keep it to one goal at a time and I know how much I need to save beforehand. It helps keep from getting carried away because I have $X burning a hole in my pocket.
    Finally, if I have a full kitty and no preplanned item to buy on the horizon, I put the money into long term savings and don't think about it again.

    It has taken me over a year to get disciplined enough to follow this method. There have been some suprises that have wiped out my plans. It's been really eye-opening to do this while I have regular income coming in. It's certainly not going to happen when I don't.

    Finally, a couple of other things I've found are good to check out:
    1. IRS filings. I paid someone to look over my returns for the past three years which I had self-filed. Good thing I did.
    2. Credit rating and fico score. I was suprised that mine wasn't quite as pristine as I expected it to be (and VERY suprised at who had requested it)
    3. Medical and dental health. Make sure that your in good shape because these expenses and health insurance will be much more expensive if not part of a company plan.

    It's been more than a year to get in financial shape, but having not found a better job in the meantime I'm glad that I've been setting this money aside. Come my next paycheck I should have enough financial cushion to say goodbye if I want to.

    One thing I decided to do though: Don't burn my bridges. I'm not going to write a goodbye manifesto to embarass

    1. Re:Finances are the hardest by doconnor · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you are going to the extream in saving money. Have you considered giving up your car. While taking transit will take extra time, you can spend that time productively reading or working on a palmtop or laptop. You can rent a car for the times when you need one or join a car sharing club.

    2. Re:Finances are the hardest by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you are going to the extream in saving money

      Yes, some friends have said that my saving patterns are excessive. All I can say is I don't personally feel comfortable enough to do without a regular paycheck yet. But I'm not just doing this to get more money, it's also to learn to be more self-sufficient and in control of my finances. If someone had just given me all the money I have saved now last year, I would have burned through it rapidly with my old habits. I do still lust for new things, but I think my demons are much more under control.

      Have you considered giving up your car. While taking transit will take extra time, you can spend that time productively reading or working on a palmtop or laptop. You can rent a car for the times when you need one or join a car sharing club.

      I live in a city with poor mass transit, but I have started using it. That's mainly how I get my gas costs so low. Unfortunately, there are still many, many places transit doesn't go.

      But thanks for the link about the car sharing club. I hadn't even heard of this before. I'll have to see what sort of things like this are set up in my area.

  389. great satisfaction by super7 · · Score: 1

    Have you tried to look for a job in Tech lately?

    1. Re:great satisfaction by hatstandman · · Score: 1

      I've done this together with 4 members of a department that formed a reasonable part of the company's income. While it did cause some problems for them, it brought home to all of us after a time that the statement "no-one is indispenable" is really true (it took them several months of lost revenue to start recovering); many people do this to try and get a pay rise or better conditions etc.;considering the job market at the moment, it's much more worth while to talk to someone first (if you can). Having said all this, we couldn't have chosen better (we've in fact all gone to work for the same company) - more pay, better conditions, better work etc.

  390. caution by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    >when you are asked what steps you took before deciding to leave at an interview.

    Remember that there's a huge taboo against criticizing former employers, no matter how much they deserve it. If you're a suit you may be able to get away with saying "fundamental policy differences".

    If you find yourself trying to convince an interviewer that you were the good guy, you've taken a wrong turn.

    1. Re:caution by jasonzzz · · Score: 1


      There is also a legal taboo in your former employers - HR and managers - from speaking badly about you. The logic from prior examples are from prior employees who had sued bad on 'libelous' type of comments that the former employers used when they were called back by the new employer. The end result is that former employers are advised by their legal and HR depts to not give out anything aside from the fact that they were employed there once and when the employee was separated.

  391. Learnframe by sprekken · · Score: 1

    I used to be in a very similar situation at this company in Utah. Management had totally fucked themselves and the company, and tried to make all of their development staff (upwards of 100 or so) work extreme hours to compensate. At the same time they had lapsed on payments to 401K, benefits, and had bounced a few paychecks.

    I could see what was happening and left, but most of the poor schmucks there stayed, despite not getting paychecks week after week. This is why management can get away with treating programmers like shit. Many of them believe the "Oh, yeah, the money will be in next friday, so you'll get paid then" FUD that they spew.

    WAKE UP! If you know that you're on a sinking ship, get the hell outta dodge!

  392. Re:Where did they use the money ? by pinka4242 · · Score: 0

    At least someone did use the money more productively than sometwo else did.

  393. yeah, life sucks by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

    There were two instances where our company's president said something to the effect that management was dissapointed at people who were putting in the minimum amount of time (40 hours). I have had vacation time denied because a project was in the works that I had written code for (code that was well tested and qualified). They wanted me to be around incase 'anything went wrong'. The only thing that went wrong was the other company not being available at all during the time I wanted to take off. This resulted in me sitting around writing comments on slashdot all week and working on low priority features all week. This has been their excuse for the last 2 times I requested even a friday off (DENIED). I have actually been called back in on my way home after a 12 hour day to fix bugs in code that everyone knew was not going to be released to the public. I dont think anyone here is getting paid accordingly, even with a huge corp. behind us, the salaries are weak. I have contributed a majority of the code in our software, there are comments all the time that if i left or was hit by a bus, the company would have to abandon ship. We are allowed 10 personal/sick/vacation days per year, all inclusive, no more. If your car breaks down on the way to work, there goes one of you vacation das. If you have the flu for 2 days, thats 2 days you will have to make up for. I have only taken 2 so far. I would be better off working for the US postal service. I dont think they know Im going postal, everything looks normal to management. Fsck this job! Im going to grep for something better.

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
  394. Uh, no that's not true. by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1
    Seriously. Even in this crappy economy, you can always get a job (waiting tables, manual labor, etc.) that will cover rent/mortgage and food. It might not be what you want to do, and your quality of life may decrease temporarily, but it can cover until you find a better job.
    Unfortunately that's not true at all because the employers for those jobs (waiting tables, manual labor, etc.) will take one look at your resume and laugh in your face. Why? Because they know that anyone who used to work at some high tech company making six figures isn't going to stay one second at a low paying job if another opportunity presents itself.

    I know because I worked at Cisco Systems and have been turned down for several lower paying jobs for exactly that reason (I called to find out why I didn't get the job and they told me).

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
  395. Do a startup! by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    The engineers and key people can quit and go start a competitive (or perhaps not-so-competitive, depending on what you signed when you were hired) firm. Some of you (i.e. all of you) will probably have to empty your life savings and go into hock up to your eyeballs, but hey, it's worth it. Oh, you'll probably have to work 60 hour weeks on the normal stuff, plus spend another 10-20 hrs each week doing the "odds-and-ends" that need to be done around the office like vacuuming, answering phones, cleaning windows, and scrubing toilets. Hiring some to do that stuff just depletes your limited financial resources. Paychecks can be "irregular", health insurance and taxes will eat you alive, and investors (if you can find any) will want 90% of everything, but hey, it's worth it.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  396. Am I the only one dumbfounded by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who thinks this guy is whining about nothing?

    50 hour weeks?!? DUDE, that's like every job I've ever had. I reguarly put in 50 hour weeks in periods when I'm not getting abused.

    If you want to be considered a punch card guy and make punch card, working the line wages then go for it. If you want to make management or white collar wages and be considered in that group then you work 50+ hour weeks regularly.

    Listen man, this isn't France where you get paid not to work, and this isn't Spain with 30% unemployment. If you were working 75-80 hour weeks then I could identify with you.

    Whining about a 50 hour week... jeeeez.

    -rt

    1. Re:Am I the only one dumbfounded by this? by L10N · · Score: 1

      What were the conditions of your contract? Were you told you would routinely work 50 hours a week? Are you working 50 hours a week because of your own inability to get what needs done that others would complete in a 40 hour week? My contract says 40 hours a week with occassional overtime. If your contract is like mine and you work 50 hours a week most of the time then I have a phrase for you:

      SUCKER!
      Good day.

      --
      "What we do in life echoes in eternity." Maximus Decimus Meridius
  397. I want to make no more $$$ by mrycar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Follow the parent posts instructions and be guaranteed never to get promoted.

    --
    Gator/Claria is Spyware.
  398. Where do I send a resume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Sounds like a sh*tty place to work, but it's better than being unemployed (and my last job)...

  399. Perfect by forii · · Score: 1

    You got it exactly. The problem is that the poster is unhappy with his job. Saying that they have too much work is just a lame justification. There's nothing wrong with wanting to leave if you're unhappy. Hell, you should leave if you're unhappy. But don't make up excuses. Of course, when you're unhappy with your job, ANYTHING feels like an unreasonable amount of work.

  400. Don't have a job? by penis+fish · · Score: 0

    Don't have a job? Go work at McDonald's, I'm sure they'd hire you. Pretentious fucks.

    --
    helo wat is ur asl ?
  401. Almost did it, but... by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    I was in an analogous situation about 10 years ago. I worked for a large government agency charged with some responsibility for regulating a new and growing sort of business. It was a problem. The good people in that business were making good money but having problems navigating outdated regulations. The bad people in that business were ignoring all regulations, making more money than you can possibly imagine, and had nothing to fear from a regulatory enforcement infrastructure that was just coming into existence.

    We spent three years studying the business, briefing lawyers who, in turned, briefed the Secy of the Treasury, and writing reports. At the end of three years, we had seen everything, done everything and knew every aspect of the business frontwards and backwards.

    At our last group meeting, I told the group "The people in this room know, collectively, more about this business than any other similarly-sized group of people in the world. Let's all resign and start our own firm. We'll all be millionaires before the end of the next calendar year."

    It never happened. Two of the key people were lifers with the government and had never paid any social security. The option of going out on their own, literally with absolutely no safety net for retirement or health problems, scared them to death. They refused to participate. Without them, the entire necessary skill set simply wouldn't have existed and even if the rest of us had jumped ship, we would have failed.

    So we all stayed.

    I was pissed. Then resigned. And then vindicated. You see, after several more years had passed, literally everyone at that meeting had approached me to say they should have gone through with it.

    Ah, well. C'est la vie. I moved on to work that I thought was OK. Then I moved on to work that I dearly loved, so sticking around was ultimately a good enough choice for me.

    Of course, a couple of weeks ago I got official notice that my job would be coming to an end at the end of 2004. One of the nice things about working for U.S. federal government and enduring our low wages is that when you're going to be downsized, there are rules that prevent it from happening without exploring other alternatives and you get plenty of warning.

    So I'm looking. Being a lifer, though, my universe of potential positions is limited to the federal civil service. Anybody know any agencies hiring a qualified field investigator/Unix sysadmin/writer/photographer/frontline support tech/analyst....et al?

  402. No at work but at school... by Stonan · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I as in Grade 8, the school board in our area decided rather than cutting all teacher's salaries they would dismiss 2 teachers instead.

    This makes sense except that it's union so those with seniority kept their jobs. We the students were really pissed off because 2 good young teachers were going to be axed and there were at least 5 teachers that were no younger than 62. 2 of them had to take insulin shots every 2-3 hours (and they did miss and go into shock on more than one occasion). 2 didn't care about their jobs anymore and it was evident in the quality of the classes. 1 seemed to think that nothing had changed since the 1890s and that a teacher should run their class via fear and intimidation. She was also becoming senile although she would blame this on her students 'playing tricks on her'.

    One day at 9:30am EVERY student in the school (a junior high, grades 8-10) walked out and started protesting in front of the school. The principal came out and tried to dissuade us and was having a good go at it until the press and the TV cameras showed up. A group of the best speaking, most presentable students addressed the press and told them exactly what was going on. As soon as the parents saw the 6:00 news, they weren't so mad about their kids walking out as they were pissed that quality teachers were being fired so 'useless' ones could earn an extra year of undeserved wages.

    The next day students from 10 other schools in the area did the same.

    After 2 days of the school board receiving calls and letters demanding certain body parts of theirs on a platter, they reluctantly found other areas to make up the money instead of firing teachers.

    This also shows one of the drawbacks of unions: sacrificing youth and skill for old age a treachery...

    PS: Read your NDA. Most only cover the property of the company, not the 'dirty laundry' btw employees and management.

    --
    The GEEK shall inherit the earth...
  403. We did this by MaxBlue · · Score: 1

    A group of us (five total) quite and formed our own consulting company back in '97. We then turned around and sold our services back to the original company (three of us stayed on for about another year).

    The money earned by keeping three of us at the company payed to keep our company running that first year. We then rode the Y2K wave of software upgrades which put us in a really great position $$$ wise. We were growing strong until......

    ....one of the original five got greedy. We attempted to branch out into another area (software develpoment) but then attempted to merge with two other companies. After the dust settled there wasn't much left.

    Leasons learned:
    Trust but Verify, Get it in Writing, Read What You Sign, Keep Abreast of the Companies Condition, Don't Get Greedy

    --
    RTFM? FTFM!!
  404. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by MrScience · · Score: 1

    I still don't see what have you got to loose by communicating with your management. I mean, hey! If they fire you for your crazy ideas of time management... then you can at least accept unemployment...

    --

    You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

  405. No such thing as unlawful termination by nightsweat · · Score: 1
    Except when you were terminated becasue you are a member of a protected class. Most states in the union are "at will" states, which mean that I can fire you for showing up with mismatched socks, and you can quit at any time without giving me notice.

    Intelligent career management would indicate it's better to treat employees well on the way out so they don't try to sue you or steer clients/prospective employees away. It also would indicate that giving no notice when you quit is not going to help you if you run into one of your managers later on in life or if you were expecting a good recommendation.

    But legally, I can term you for just about anything.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  406. Bad strategy by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    The employer can fire his entire department, but who then would replace those workers? H1B visa sweatshopsters? If he can find them in time.

    If he fires the whole department, he is likely to face a work stoppage so crippling that boiling hot shit would roll a long way upwards, or the company would go under.

    The workers might or might not have a situation of no UI and a lousy reference, but the affected company might, depending on its size, not exist anymore.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Bad strategy by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      The employer can fire his entire department, but who then would replace those workers? H1B visa sweatshopsters? If he can find them in time.

      Isn't this the "crippled American economy" where the job market is so thin, people are taking twice the hours at half the pay?

      I'll bet the employer has a thousand resumees sitting in a file in their HR department just itching for callbacks.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:Bad strategy by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      I'll bet the employer has a thousand resumees sitting in a file in their HR department

      They may be able to hire on new people, but a good rule of thumb is it takes a programmer about 6 months to become fully productive in a new job. Before that, they're figuring out how the other parts of the system work, getting to know their team, hunting down the architect to ask "what the hell were you thinking??" and so on.

      So yeah, they could get some warm bodies in there, but they'd have a lot of trouble getting the 50-60 hours of code they're getting from the current employees

    3. Re:Bad strategy by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Isn't this the "crippled American economy" where the job market is so thin, people are taking twice the hours at half the pay?

      No. For starters, number of hours worked has declined over the past 4 years (down to 33.7 hours/week in 2003 from 34.5 hours/week in 1999 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics). Salaries have increased in that time (not much when inflation-adjusted, but some).

      Unemployment is only around 6.1%, a level considered extremely low until the most recent economic boom. During the 1980s the government actively took steps to stop unemployment from getting below the 7% level as it was believed that would trigger massive recessions and spiralling unemployment, and only briefly did it get as low as 6%--it was often over 9% even during the 1980s economic boom. From 1991-1994 the rate was substantially higher than 6%, peaking near 8%.

      By Q4 of 2001 the 2001 recession had ended and the GDP began to grow (e.g. the GDP grew by 1.4% in Q4 of 2002 and 1.9% in Q1 of 2003).

      The US economy isn't in great shape but it's still growing slowly--the 70s, 80s, and 90s all had substantially worse periods than what we've seen to date. Hopefully we don't see one of those.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    4. Re:Bad strategy by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      No. For starters, [...]

      Sorry, I should have been more specific. I was talking exclusively about the tech sector. (Un)Employment figures for minimum wage and/or blue collar jobs aren't terribly relevant to the plight of the programmer.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    5. Re:Bad strategy by luzrek · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, despite what CS majors say, there are lots of people who can write programs. During the early days of computers, there were not a lot of programmers. Now there are. The number of programming jobs have not increased at the same rate. Therefore, the supply has increased while the demand has not. The salaries of programmers should go down. The way for a programmer who was able to demand three times average salary in the early ninties to keep the same income is to work three times as much. Sorry, that's economics.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    6. Re:Bad strategy by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have been more specific. I was talking exclusively about the tech sector.

      Okay. The original statement was:

      Isn't this the "crippled American economy" where the job market is so thin, people are taking twice the hours at half the pay?

      In the computer field, pay is up 11% since 2000 (15% since 1999) and hours worked are down over 4% since 2000 (same since 1999). Again, all statistics come from http://www.bls.gov (the Bureau of Labor Statistics).

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    7. Re:Bad strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I think the 'tech sector' should include only technicians, engineers, and people who actually do stuff with stuff. The 'IT' sector should be cut adrift and called the psuedo-tech sector or something.

      Because I am an electronic technician with firmware and embedded controller experience. Decades of it. Not some clown who decided when the 'web explosion' happened to get into editing HTML and fucking perl scripts.

    8. Re:Bad strategy by pyite · · Score: 1

      Yes, and we all know that anyone can come up to speed on a product instantly. I dealt with this just today. I did a one time job for the company that kind of let me go "until they needed me." And now they need me to do something no one else knows how to do, and I said "Sorry, I have a new full time job." The look of fear in a boss's eye is a very interesting thing.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    9. Re:Bad strategy by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      In the computer field, pay is up 11% since 2000 (15% since 1999) and hours worked are down over 4% since 2000 (same since 1999). Again, all statistics come from http://www.bls.gov (the Bureau of Labor Statistics).

      Your statistics don't account for unemployment in the IT industry (what, BTW, is considered "computer field" by the BLS?) or the number of people who've left IT altogether to find work in another field.

      Statistics are fun for managers and the media to play with, but they don't particularly represent reality.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    10. Re:Bad strategy by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      Yes, and we all know that anyone can come up to speed on a product instantly.

      Who says they're doing anything that earth-shatteringly difficult? If they're so important to the company and so skilled that nobody else could pick up what they're doing, why aren't they approaching management with a contract (re)negotiation? If they're so irreplacable, surely their employer realizes this and will react accordingly. If they are replacable, well, they may find themselves on the unemployment line.

      Surely if their jobs are so spectacular they'd be seeking professional advice rather than Slashdot rantings.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  407. High wages in a boom economy is revenge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    High wages in a boom economy is revenge. Although there are exceptions, most employers treat employees like shit. As labor, when the market allows it, which is rarely, you are totally justified in asking for more.

  408. Yeah, I'm there! by !Da_BLaRGiNaToR! · · Score: 0

    I've been in that situation for 3 years now. it's called not-for-profit healthcare! Imagine you are the only tech for a huge hospital with 3200 employees, and about 40-50% of the PC's at your site are still 200MHz!

    --
    I am BLaRG!
  409. Re:do it! walkout! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Fast Food, even the managers are easy to replace. He didn't turn nice because he needed you, he turned nice because his boss didn't need a manager who provoked employees to walk out.

    In this economy, the same applies to the tech biz.

  410. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by mrycar · · Score: 1

    Communication is the key. Never fear change. Use it as an opportunity for yourself.

    I always like the opportunity a crisis can cause. Identify the issues before they are impacting you. Then approach the proper management in charge and provide a detailed solution at resolving the issue. Then present a detailed plan on how to implement your solutions complete with cost analysis, savings, pay back periods, as well as justifications.

    After the presentation(s), collect their comments and if its a go-ahead, don't be shy with stating the rewards you seek up front.

    You say Employees like sheep, I disagree, they like employees that look at for the company and are willing to help it in times of need.

    As a person that has survived and prospered well during lay-offs and times of corporate crisis, I can assure you thismethod works and works well. Just be prepared to put the effort in to design a proper solution before approaching management.

    --
    Gator/Claria is Spyware.
  411. Becareful - Walkout can make you liable by CdaveC · · Score: 1

    If your employer can prove that you banded together to do this and did not follow proper labor procedures you could be opening your self for legal action.

    As a previous poster mentioned, know your rights, then you may consider work slow downs as more effective (also keeps the bucks coming in the pay the bills).

    However, you have to be careful with work slow downs too. Depending on your employers past history on dealing with labor conflicts they may see this as an open invitation for disciplinary action.

    Best thing, talk to your government's labor board.

    PS: unions are not the answer.

  412. Re:Parent shows why you should see a lawyer *first by Triple+Helix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is excellent advise. We consulted a well-regarded law firm specializing in intellectual property litigation before writing one line of code or drafting a single design document. We went so far as to go out of our way not to use any paradigms or algorithms from the previous company, even if they were considered general knowledge in the industry. That did not stop the lawsuit. I could go on and on about how frivolous the whole thing is, but unfortunately the goal wasn't to win the lawsuit, but instead to bury us in legal fees. They were successful in that regard.

  413. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by ryanwright · · Score: 1

    Second, your manager's boss will already be on a personal level with your manager.

    And the first thing he will do when you walk out the door is call your manager up and say, "Hey, Joe came in and bitched about something. What's the deal with that guy?" Now you're on everybody's shit-list.

    --
    -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  414. On-call is a gray area by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

    Every once in a while you get managers who think that salaried positions + cellphone = free labor to be exploited

    I once had to educate my boss about the realities of being "on call". He seemed to think that my staff would all carry beepers, and I would work out a rotation so that someone would be the primary contact for any given hour. It wasn't so much an "emergency response" capability as it was unpaid 2nd & 3rd shift operations via remote control. Comp. time doesn't work because every little "emergency" creates a coverage hole during regular business hours. I asked, "What do you intend to do when the beepers are simply turned off? Are you going to discipline people for not working hours that were neither scheduled nor paid?" Of course, nobody would put a mandated schedule in writing, and the underlying problem was that we were too thinly staffed.

    Ultimately, common sense prevailed. We fixed some salary issues (people got raises, and therefore felt better about the beeper issue). We added an entry-level position to work evenings and Saturday morning. For those times when escalation was truly necessary, the new entry-level people had a list of senior staff with beepers who were quite willing to help.

  415. MOD THIS UP!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 FUNNY

  416. What to do when you're in a sole proprietorship? by orpheus2000 · · Score: 1

    I'm in a sticky situation right now where I was hired on to be a Linux admin but now I'm writing product manuals for elderly computer users and developing a proprietary windows solution for our product. The trouble is, I've got a single boss, and the other person is the secretary. That's it, just three people. I'd not think of leaving, but I'm currently waiting on word that I'll be hired at an IT consulting company doing what I really want to do.

    So if I get the job, how do I leave since I'm the sole full-time technical person?

    BTW: when I joined on there were two developers, but they left a month after I got there and the 'company' took a completely different direction and I got pigeonholed into being a project manager for a windows solution.

  417. def'n of "unemployment" by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    As was mentioned before, unemployment only applies if you get fired, or do not leave on your own accord.

    Not according to my dictionary! From wordnet:

    n : the state of being unemployed or not having a job.

    What you're thinking of is technically referred to as "collecting unemployment insurance" (or being "on unemployment" for short), and is not a necessary corrolary to being unemployed at all.

    Then again, "picking nits" technically refers to the practice of removing louse eggs, so maybe I'll shut up now. :)

  418. Why not Union? by edremy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Because some of us have seen the absurdity of unionization taken too far. (And before I begin, I'm *not* anti-union. They're necessary in a lot of cases.)

    An old employer of mine had a mixed staff: some union, some not. I worked in the analytical lab: one of the dozen or so instruments was designated "union." While I was there, Union Employee X was the only person allowed to touch this instrument. Luckily, Employee X was a hard worker and a decent guy: he even trained one of us to do samples on the QT so that everything wouldn't back up for 2 weeks while he was on vacation. The two previous iterations of X were not. They would come in in the morning and run the dozen or so samples their contract required. Finished by 10AM, they then read the newspaper the rest of the day. Too bad if you were one of the ~10 labs that needed a sample analyzed: you just had to wait until it got through the queue.

    My personal favorite: distributing liquid waste cans was a union job. If you needed a waste can, you walked to the end of the hall and filled out a form and a union employee would bring you one eventually. Where were the new waste cans stored? Under the table with the form. But don't touch: I got reprimanded for carrying one back when I had forgotten a request the day before and the HPLC was about to overflow.

    They didn't even do well by their employees. Shortly before I started there they went on strike despite wages and benefits well above the industry average. The company hired the salaried folks to work extra hours to keep up production. Productivity soared, errors dropped, and the union eventually slunk back to work with the same contract as before but no worker paychecks for a number of months.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:Why not Union? by crazyphilman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well... I don't think that's the norm. At different times, I've been in three fairly large unions myself, two of which were high-tech related (generally government tech workers get added to an existing technical union, representing medical staff or teachers). Also, my father was in the HVAC international union, and my mother was in CSEA. These are all really huge, with tens of thousands of members in the U.S. alone. For example, my current union has over 50,000 members, and we're affiliated with several larger unions like AFL-CIO. NONE of the shops I've been in were run the way you describe. Even my father's experiences, and the HVAC and Steamfitter unions are strict, don't line up with what you're describing. I think your experience derived from poor local union management, and trust me, it doesn't represent the norm.

      I'm not saying there aren't some annoyances in union shops, but they're minor compared with what non-union guys have to put up with. These days, being in a union is pretty much your only shot at enjoying a reasonable working lifestyle. And, if some unions, far and few between, are mismanaged, well, isn't it that way with all human organizations?

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  419. Premadonas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You misspelled pre-Madonnas (note capitalization, double-n, and hyphen). HTH.

    Unless perhaps you meant prima donnas, from "first lady", a term borrowed from ballet that refers to a skilled, but expensive and demanding/touchy worker?

    As an aside: remember the study that demonstrated that people that have low-average skills tend to (far) overestimate themselves (and others) and people that have high skills tend to (slightly) underestimate themselves? I think much of this "I've met buckets of skilled IT professionals that don't have jobs" business is just another manifestation of that study.

  420. Or how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: So, why did you leave your last position?

    A: Management acted in unethical ways so I decided it was time to part ways.

  421. Get a job... by RadarGil · · Score: 1

    Lets face if you are being taken advantage of because you are good and you want to teach management a lesson have the whole department post their resumes.
    Our boss actually received one of my guys resumes through Monster... It was hilarious.
    I worked in a department with three other guys. Everyone posted their resumes and we all had job offers within the month. No it doesn't happen over night. I was last man out. I went to turn in my resignation and my project manager asked how much for you to stay. I liked my job. So I told them to match the salary I was offered and let me pick out the replacements for the team. I got a big ass raise and built my team from scratch.
    After that guess what... It started all over again... (the guys that quit the first time had a good time with the "I told you so"s) so after two years I said screw it and left... The job I have now rocks and I wouldn't trade it for the world...
    The morale of the story... The only way to change management is to change jobs...
    Don't think going on unemployment is going to impress anyone.. It will hurt your resume and your credit report... You don't like the job your in, get another. If you are as good as you think you are there should not be a problem with this regardless of the market.... Happy Job Hunting....

  422. OT hospitals. by twitter · · Score: 1

    They used to be run by doctors, at least the good ones were. Other forces, not present in the software world, are at work there. I'm sorry to hear things have gotten bad. It's one thing when a doctor willingly throws themselves into administration and active practice so that they work 60 hour weeks, and another thing entirely when a nurse is forced to do so for "budget" reasons.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:OT hospitals. by Ioldanach · · Score: 1
      It's one thing when a doctor willingly throws themselves into administration and active practice so that they work 60 hour weeks,

      Hard to suppress a bit of laughter here, but I'm guessing you don't know many doctors... many doctors routinely work 80+ hour weeks. A quick google came across this discussion thread on the subject. In fact, it seems many surgeons are at the hospital 100+ hours per week. (Remember, there are only 168 hours in a week.) That leaves them with less than 10 hours per day for sleeping, eating, bathing, and commuting.

      Part of the problem is a lack of doctors pushing the hours necessary up. Of course, there's a catch-22, there. The biggest reasons people don't go into medicine is insane hours and a need to put in those insane hours in order to pay off your medical degree.

    2. Re:OT hospitals. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      The biggest reasons people don't go into medicine is insane hours and a need to put in those insane hours in order to pay off your medical degree.

      And here I thought it was the insane malpractice insurance payments. Hell, for what an OBGYN pays each year, I could probably buy a Ferrari!

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  423. People would die faster? Bull S**T by spineboy · · Score: 1

    I'm an orthopaedic surgery resident and I already have enough to do (working 100-120 hrs/week). The last thing that I want to hear is that the nurse couldn't get an IV in some patient after trying only for 5 minutes. I (and most doctors) already do plenty of nursing chores (start IV's, push meds) and the patients do just fine , thank you.
    But I realize that we all are a team doctors, nurses, orderlies, techs and housecleaning. If anyone of us slacks -it makes the whole system unmanageable.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  424. While you were out we upgraded that expression by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1
    Ever heard the expression The squeaky wheel gets the oil?
    Sorry, while you were out we upgraded that expression to:

    The squeaky wheel gets replaced, by some contractor from Romania

    Love and kisses,
    The Management

    P.S., Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out!

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
  425. Ok, that quote is driving me nuts... by The+Closet+Optimist · · Score: 1

    I have heard it before! Is it from the Simpsons? Office Space? I just can't seem to remember.

    --
    "It isn't necessary to completely suppress the news; it is sufficient to delay the news until it no longer matters." - N
    1. Re:Ok, that quote is driving me nuts... by Alranor · · Score: 1

      Bart: Unckie Herb, what advice would you give to a young boy who would most likely become a bum like yourself?

      Herb: Discarded pizza boxes are an inexpensive source of cheese.

    2. Re:Ok, that quote is driving me nuts... by The+Closet+Optimist · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the Danny De Vito episode when he makes the baby translator. For the life of me I couldn't quite seem to remember where I heard that one. Thanks!

      --
      "It isn't necessary to completely suppress the news; it is sufficient to delay the news until it no longer matters." - N
  426. 50 to 60 hours per week by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    • You suddenly find yourself working 50-60 hour weeks, put on call with no compensation, given unreasonable amounts of work and generally treated like dirt
    How did you manage to get your hours reduced in a financial crunch? Or were you only slummin' and putting in 30 to 40 hours per week before?

    Are there successful tech jobs that offer 40 hours per week limits? My wife would be so happy if I could work only 50 to 60 hours per week.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:50 to 60 hours per week by metachimp · · Score: 1

      On the last contract job I had, I was contractually limited to working no more than 40 hours a week.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
    2. Re:50 to 60 hours per week by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      • On the last contract job I had, I was contractually limited to working no more than 40 hours a week.
      That's usually stipulated as a limit on hours billed but spoken with the raised eyebrow from the contractee indicating that non-billed hours in excess of 40/week are Okee Dokee.

      When you make it to salaried position...or worse, senior management, you get 40 hours a week -- for sleep!

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    3. Re:50 to 60 hours per week by metachimp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, I don't work for free, so I raise no eyebrows on that score.

      I've had salaried positions, as well, and I certainly prefer them, mainly because I can have a much more flexible schedule.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  427. Too bad there's not a Score6 for this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gewg

  428. But there has to be a union in the first place by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1
    That's the beauty of these modern day yellow dog contracts. IT workers are typically either libertarians/objectivists or hyper-conservatives who would rather set their faces on fire and put it out with a fork than join a union.

    Management realizes this and so freely puts such clauses in their contracts. I know because there was just such a clause in my contract when I started working at Cisco Systems.

    When I got laid off I signed another contract for the severance package I received and it too had the exact same prohibition against enticing co-workers into quiting.

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
    1. Re:But there has to be a union in the first place by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Management realizes this and so freely puts such clauses in their contracts. I know because there was just such a clause in my contract when I started working at Cisco Systems. When I got laid off I signed another contract for the severance package I received and it too had the exact same prohibition against enticing co-workers into quiting.

      Whether they put those provisions in the contract or not, they're still illegal and unenforceable. They could make you sign a contract that says the CEO retains the right to behead you with a samurai sword if you don't touch your forehead to the ground when he walks by, but such a provision would be unenforceable because it's illegal. They could produce a signed paper after the CEO lops off a head, but the judge would toss it aside as an illegal contract and he'd still get charged with murder. You are not bound by illegal provisions in a contract, whether you signed it or not. This is basic contract law, man.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  429. I resigned, but left it too late by andrew+cooke · · Score: 1

    After something similar (but due to bad management rather than bad economy), I resigned and took a months holiday. At the end of the month I returned, negotiated better working conditions (double time for overtime and working from home) and started again.

    However the intense period before - when we were working to meet a deadline - was too much (that holiday was to mentally recover - I did little except sleep and occasionally cry/shout/hit walls). I no longer care much about the company and don't enjoy working there (despite the better conditions).

    So I'm looking for another job.

    Conclusions, then:

    - If you're critical to the business you can dictate terms (reasonably, of course)

    - Don't leave it too long before doing something, or the harm may already be done.

    --
    http://www.acooke.org
  430. 3 things you must do! by FSK · · Score: 1

    1. Make sure everyone is on board. The last thing you want is for word to leak out.
    2. Talk to a lawyer.
    3. Seriously, no joke, talk to a lawyer.

    --
    When punk rock is outlawed, only outlaws will have punk rock.
  431. Quit Slave Mentality by potnoodle · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Freedom is priceless.
    Do not be scared by lack of money.
    Just put aside enough and then tell your
    greedy asshole boss to go fuck himself
    (politely if you're still in good terms).
    If you have a mortgage/family, well you only
    have yourself to blame for the shackles
    around your ankles.
    Free your mind and the rest will follow.

  432. Software Etc. by ictatha · · Score: 1

    It wasn't really an IT job, but it involves Slashdot'ish topics, so here we go:

    I was a sales associate at Software Etc. my senior year in high school. There were a few of us working there that collected the Star Trek : TNG CCG (or ST:TNGCCG) cards (which we sold at the store), including the assistant manager. One day the assistant manager went on break and was going to buy some of those three-ring binder pages to put cards in, but the store was really busy. So he put them back in the back room to pay for before he left, but he forgot to pay for them when he left.

    That evening after getting home, he realized his mistake and went back to the store to pay for them. However, someone from corporate "loss prevention" was at the store when he came back and fired him for 'stealing' the $2.00 item.

    Everyone at the store quit that night, except for one lone sales associate who really needed the job (and became the store manager shortly after this incident).

    Here's the kicker: This happened the night before the release of the original Playstation :)

    We all went to the assistant manager's house that night for a little party, and around 10:30pm or so, decided it was time to let the regional manager know that there wouldn't be anyone to open the store in the morning (the lone sales associate hadn't been trained to open the register or anything...).

    The next morninig we went and watched as the 30 or so people on the reserve list for the Playstation showed up to a locked storefront. Several of the recognized us and asked what was going on. So we told our story, and Software Etc. lost several customers that day.

    Ah, the things you can afford to do when living with your parents...

    --
    "... the advance of civilization is nothing but an exercise in the limiting of privacy" - Janov Pelorat
  433. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spoke up about the 60-80 hour weeks I've had to put in at my company, and ended up getting written up for "insubordination", put on 30 days probation, and given a new job description (with no place for signature) which stated that I was to work from 9a-5p and any overtime that my boss deemed necessary for me to work, or I could be fired.

    Now if only the job market didn't suck so much :-(

  434. I can confirm what s/he said by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1
    I too talked with a lawyer about such contracts and he also confirmed what the parent post stated. Although he was much more cynical in his presentation.

    "Your employer can fire you for good reasons, or no good reasons. He can be stupid, he can be cutting his nose off to spite his face, he can be unfair, he can fire you because today is Teusday and the sky is blue (think Drew Carey's manager on the Drew Carey show)."

    "As long as your not fired because of race, gender, religious persuasion, veteran status or (in some very limited areas) sexual orientation then your employer in at-will states can fire you for any reason or no reason at all."

    That's an almost verbatim quote from him.
    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
    1. Re:I can confirm what s/he said by swillden · · Score: 1

      Did he comment about the other side of at-will employment? That is, the benefits to the employees (no legal requirement to give notice, general unenforceability of non-compete agreements, etc.)?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:I can confirm what s/he said by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1

      Nope, apparently he didn't think the benefits were worth commeting about. And my experience has confirmed that.

      --
      Debunking the "59 Deceits"
  435. 'Well I Can't Say I've Been Missing It Bob!' by killmeplease · · Score: 0

    __ __
    0
    _____

    --
    - Kill Yourself, spare us all! -
  436. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by goodhell · · Score: 1

    I do have to agree with some of what you are saying. And then again I have to agree with what the parent posted.

    You need to keep communication lines open. But, this is like poker or dating (but some of you are unfamiliar with that). Don't let them see your cards. Don't let them have all the knowledge and power over you. Otherwise you'll end up getting bent over for all your worth and then discarded when they are done with you.

  437. Perspective: use it or lose it by foobario · · Score: 3, Informative

    Man, at my last job we *dreamed* about getting "50-60 hour weeks, put on call with no compensation, given unreasonable amounts of work and generally treated like dirt". After the first round of layoffs, my job sounded like what you describe... ...but there were 4 more rounds of layoffs after that, and each time someone in my group got axed, I got their workload added onto mine.

    Try 80-90 hour weeks, 7 months without a Saturday or Sunday off so I could finish a project that my boss took credit for, denied a promotion because the reports of that same boss showed I wasn't really putting in an effort, and constant Warnings Of Doom from everyone about how if I quit I'd never be able to find another job.

    My health got shot to hell, my attitude got shot to hell, my *life* got shot to hell... one day a co-worker asked my boss if he was worried I'd quit, given the ludicrous conditions, and my boss replied "he'll never quit... I *own* him".

    I put in my notice the next day.

    Months later, I'm still in bad health, attitude hasn't really improved, and I have made the decision to let my college degree gather dust rather than go through that again. I'm looking at going into manual labor, if my health improves enough to allow it, and taking a handful of sleeping pills, if it doesn't.

    So what was your problem again? To me, it sounds like you live in fucking SUGAR COATED *FAIRY*LAND*, cavorting with the fucking ELVES and UNICORNS and TELETUBBIES, and you're complaining that you don't like the flavor of fucking MARMALADE they put on your fucking TOAST.

    1. Re:Perspective: use it or lose it by PsibrII · · Score: 1

      Hehe. I had a similar hell job. Was in a dying industry though. Never had enough slack time to study the material I would need to jump over to more industrial type tech jobs.

      After 10 months of hell, my boss tells me I need to up production levels. And then on top of it, they decide to drop the price per unit so its impossible to make quota.

      So I ride it out, rack up as much paid vacation days as I can, moving a bit of my equipment out every day. And then when I get my check and get it cashed, I never went back.

      No stupid ritual firings, or putting up with 2 weeks of crap and then having them rifling through your tools, asking for the employee discount card back or whatever on the day you leave.

      I got a call 3 days later, ex-boss is somewhat confused, "Did you quit or what ?", I'm like "yeah, you said up production or you were gonna can me, so WTF did you expect, I'm gone" he then tries to back pedal and admits it was mostly BS. But I'm not gonna be the last rat on the sinking ship for the 4th time, this time I'm the first freaking rat to jump ship.

      I also neglected to mention the guy in the cube next to me was having paranoid delusions and talking guns, etc. A good part of the techs are ex-military and the others are streetwise. I'm sure they'll know when to duck and let the boss take the lead enema. I would grin there, but thats probably not really joke material. It was just one more factor in deciding to get out of there and retrain.

      Still job hunting, but the industrial tech pickings are better, consumer elec tech jobs don't exist anymore. Maybe I'll get stuck office temping or working the computer help desk for a while, or even stringing wire somewhere. It's no big deal. Eventually the economy will perk up, and I'll get a nice cube full of equipment and a pile of broken crap to fix again.

    2. Re:Perspective: use it or lose it by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > Months later, I'm still in bad health, attitude hasn't really improved, and I have made the decision to let my college degree gather dust rather than go through that again. I'm looking at going into manual labor, if my health improves enough to allow it, and taking a handful of sleeping pills, if it doesn't.

      --Seriously dude, get pro counseling. I say this as a friend, and as someone who has been thru the wringer personally as well. Get yourself healed mentally.

      --Best of luck to ya.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    3. Re:Perspective: use it or lose it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude,

      You should have left at exactly the time the guy above was thinking about it. You are now in the same situation (no job) but the stress level that led up to it has left you scarred.

      Knoiw when to hold them...know when to fold them...

  438. Unemployment is the least of your worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you are organizing such an exodus, you are placing yourself at great litigious risk, particularly if you are a profit center for the company. The company can sue you for damages and the courts tend to favor employers.

    You may also be unpleasantly surprised at how few employees actually quit. It's one thing to talk about it. It's another entirely to walk out the door, especially if you have responsibilities.

    By the way, the job market for IT totally sucks. You must be prepared to wait it out for almost a year (or more) in some markets. Make sure that you've got a healthy nest egg, because unemployment compensation is not in the cards if you decide to leave. Depending upon your state, the employer controls whether or not you get unemployment. They would certainly protest your filing.

  439. I know of one by macdaddy · · Score: 1
    It was a phone company/ISP in Wichita. I won't name names but it's been able 8 years or so since it happened. I don't know all the details but if memory serves me correctly the middle management treated the IT staff like shit. Overworked and underpaid the grunts. The upper management was supposedly nice. I believe that's how it went. In the end the vast majority of the IT staff quit in the same week.

    My advice is to not settle for a second-rate job. That kind of stress is not worth it. You shouldn't have to constantly watch your ass for the next person with a sharpened instrument who wants to stab you in the back. You shouldn't have to play office politics and wonder if everything your coworkers say have double meanings or wonder what their real intentions are. You should work with and for people that are looking for doing the best possible job they can a turn out the best possible product available to the users. You shouldn't work with or for people that have no ambitions farther than maintaining their own job security. We don't all have to work in an "Office Space"-like environment. I've been there. It's just not worth it. Stress affects every part of your life. Cut your losses and leave. You're loved ones and your stomach will thank you. Can you say no more Maalox?

    1. Re:I know of one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget antacids. You need a course of antibiotics to remove the Helibacter Pylori causing all that pain.

      (Probably ecacerbated through stress)

  440. You must be new here by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1

    This is Slashdot, bashing Microsoft is always on topic. :-)

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
  441. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by 5KVGhost · · Score: 1

    No, but there sure is a small circle of executives who make those tough decisions while on the way to the golf club in their 7 series BMW for a nice lobster dinner. The company I work for just cut vacation. I get 1 week a year now. I also have to take it before the fiscal year end on 9/1. So there's now no time to accrue vacation before christmas. How nice. And those altruistic beings who are just looking out for the company? Let's see how quick they are to give back that benefit once the economy turns around.

    Oops, your cynicism dial appears to be stuck at "11".

    Sometimes you're right and the people in charge are stupid, selfish bastards who'd sell their own mothers for a bigger box on the org chart. But in far more cases those vile "executives" are just like you. They're doing their jobs as best they can given the resources at their disposal. It might feel better to pretend that everything they do is motivated by personal greed and callous disregard for the workin' man, but it probably isn't true.

    Have you ever had a paycheck bounce? I have. Have you ever had your employer siezed by the IRS for failure to pay payroll taxes? I have. Have you ever been promised bonueses on eight separate occaisions and received a fraction on one only once? I have. Have you ever been fired because your manager thought you were better than him? I have. Have you ever gotten in trouble for not predicting the future or reading someone's mind? I have. Have you ever predicted a project's failure months and millions of dollars in advance? I have.

    "Have you ever had your toes gnawed off by your bosses' rabid pet weasles, while he dances through the office snorting coke and singing opera off key? I have!"

    Wow, bad run of luck there. Frankly, it sounds like you really need to choose your employers a bit more carefully. Or find a new career. And maybe a good therapist.

    And you'll be the first to be laid off. Employers want sheep. If you want to keep your job, act like one. Tell them nothing because they're certainly not volunteering any information. If you don't like your job, find another one. But never let them know you're looking. Otherwise, they'll remove you before you have the next job lined up.

    Yes, because all employers just love to fire good people who are dissatisfied! For no reason! And they love to expose themselves to legal liability and pay lots of money, too! Because they hate hate hate you!

    But, hey, I'm a sheep who's got a nice job with a boss I actually like, so I'm clearly too far gone for my opinions to matter. Baaaa.

    The work culture in this country sucks. And it's time for a change.

    Slashdot: Changing the world one bitter rant at a time.

  442. Think about it by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Unless your work is very specialized, you are easily replaced.

    One individual in a large team, maybe. A large team with thousands of man-hours invested in a given project? Not likely. The company could never replace the collective experience it lost, and even a replacement project team of the smartest hackers in the world would be hard pressed to catch up for months.

    And, you would be replaced with cheaper labor too.

    If there was cheaper labour around who could do the same job just as well, wouldn't the company already have hired them instead? I thought you had "at will" employment in the US?

    On top of that, you will most likely take a pay cut in your next job

    If this sort of stuff is happening, then (a) it's probably worth a mild pay cut to get out if necessary, and (b) within a few months you aren't likely to have much of a job where you are anyway.

    I've seen this before. Typically, in companies that survive, a few good people leave, management wakes up to the fact that conditions are not acceptable to the workforce and those who remain get an improvement in pay and/or conditions that is enough for them to stay. If management doesn't wake up fast enough, too many good people go, and the project fails.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  443. No effect by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    At a couple places I've worked I've know departments that resigned in mass, wel at least the majority of the department. It had no effect the companies just transfered and hired ASAP and moved on. They adjust their schedules and move on. Sometimes if a single person is key to continuing on they will make an indivisual and offer that can't be refused to stay or stay longer enough to do a knowledge transfer. So in long run all you've done is lose a job, and have a tough thing to explain at your next interview.

  444. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by LookSharp · · Score: 1

    No, but there sure is a small circle of executives who make those tough decisions while on the way to the golf club in their 7 series BMW for a nice lobster dinner. ...Neeeya never be able to afford BMW 7 Series, Neeeya!!!

    That's all. I love that clip.

  445. Fired- Re-hired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of one time I was fired by an employer... I was so stressed out about the work that I said some very nasty things.. I was fired. A month later, the boss hired me back, WITH a 20% raise, and NO S41T from him for months... 8 months later, I told him where he could shove it, and got a new job making even more dough....

    So, where did all of this get me? Well, a house and a car that's almost paid for, but right now I'm unemployed! haha.

  446. Layoff versus firing by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Some states prohibit unemployment to "fired" (with cause) workers. A layoff is termination without cause. Firing is dnagerous to employers, because they bear the burden of proof should a lawyer shark come after them.

    1. Re:Layoff versus firing by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1
      Just so I understand this right...

      They can lay me off because business sucks, in which case I get unemployment benefits but no chance to sue them. Or they can fire my ass which gives me no benefits but the opportunity to take them to court if it wasn't righteous? Interesting. Sounds kinda appropriate, actually, at least on pay scales not too far in excess of unemployment benefits or in locations where the standard of living isn't ridiculously high.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  447. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    Who are these "employers" you speak of?

    Everyone at a company, from your immediate supervisor up to the seniormost chief executive, is an employEE. You're all in the same boat -- you do what the owners and/or shareholders want, or you suffer the consequences.

  448. Re:No, but...[continued] by GoatEnigma · · Score: 1

    That is the worst idea anyone has ever had.

  449. talk to the company by sniggly · · Score: 1


    You might want to group together, talk to your employer and suggest they outsource IT - to your own new company. Then you can charge them anything between $100 and $150 an hour. Perhaps it would be beneficial to your relationship with management to paint them a picture of what it would cost them to have an external IT company do all the work you do at a rate of $75 an hour or more. Naturally the risk you run is that they'll find a company in India to do your work....

    --
    Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
  450. Don't Get Mad, Get Even by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative


    Payback's a bithc:
    Call OSHA about your work stations
    Call the health department about your employee cafeteria
    Call the Fire Department about those boxes stacked in the stairwell.

    There isn't a company in the world that follows all the regulations - make 'em pay.

  451. 952 every two weeks? by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    Damn. I live in Boston off of $818/month. It sucks since my apartment is 700/month. Now I am living off of student loans. Where the hell in Boston were you living (Beacon Hill?) that you couldn't live on 1600/month well???

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
  452. Re:Refusing Overtime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An employer does not have the right to demand uncompensated overtime for a prolonged period of time. Doing so constitutes changing the conditions of employment. The last time I checked you are enttitled to refuse such changes, without losing your eligibility for unemployment.

    If this were not the case, nobody would ever be laid off. Employers would just make their jobs progressively worse until everyone quit.

    There's something sick with the economy. It seems to prefer working 4 people to death while 2 others are unemployed rather than just having 6 people have jobs.

    It would be wonderful if all engineers refused all overtime until all of the qualified engineers who are currently unemployed were back at work -- but I'm not holding my breath.

  453. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I totally understand where your frustration comes from, not everywhere is like that.

    Fortunately, it's a happy coincidence that a well-treated workforce is a more effective workforce. Keeping your staff sweet isn't just good manners, it's also good business. By cutting you down to only one week of leave, your employer has all but guaranteed a burnt-out workforce who will repeatedly take sickies within months, until they all quit because of the stress anyway. Even if they stick it out, they'll be out the door in a heartbeat when the market picks up.

    The smart employer looks at ways to improve things for their staff as a priority. Happy staff are productive staff, and benefits follow. Some perks are effectively free if your working conditions don't prevent them: flexitime and pillow days come to mind. A few extra days of leave each year, or a $100 bonus to everyone in the product team when the release goes out, do cost, but they pay back many times over.

    Although you seem to have had a particularly bad experience, there are smart employers in the world. The workforce owe it to themselves to go find the smart employers, so they can be more successful than the stupid ones, who will then go out of business, improving the overall smartness of management by evolution. :-)

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  454. Not to flame, but... by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1
    but always negotiate from a position of strength
    But, that's one hell of a lot easier said than done. As a worker the strength of your negotiations is dependent upon something you have no control over, the job market. Any skill that's in great demand will attract others to it so you can't expect to negotiate from strength because you have a "rare skill in great demand." That's at best only a temporary advantage.

    Face it, workers always have and always will negotiate from a position of weakness. The only exception to that is when there are unions.

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
    1. Re:Not to flame, but... by GeoNerd · · Score: 1

      Don't sweat it, a debate is not necessarily a flame.

      You are absolutely correct, this is easier said than done. However, I disagree that it's completely dependant on the job market. If you don't have any marketable skills, you're going to have a hard time finding a job or negotiating for *anything*. It is YOUR responsibility to develop marketable skills, regardless of your current employment situation. This goes hand-in-hand with the attitude that I outlined above.

      If you have, as another poster suggested, a year of income saved up, and/or another job lined up, that's a position of strength. You can afford to negotiate with your current employer, with the knowledge that you can walk away from the table at any time.

      If you're being hired in a high-turnover job that requires THEM to train you, you ain't got nothin' to work with. However, if you bring a certain set of skills to the table that the company needs (a common scenerio), that is also a position of strength.

      However, in the original post, the point is that your salary and benefits are negotiable, but don't negotiate if you don't have the ability to walk away.

  455. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by cyberformer · · Score: 1

    The company I work for just cut vacation. I get 1 week a year now. I also have to take it before the fiscal year end on 9/1.

    This is illegal in some states. IANAL, but the company I work for tried to force everyone to take their vacation before the end of the fiscal year.

    It turns out that they're not allowed to do this in my state (California): They can have a policy that asks people to take their vacation, but they can't just delete accrued days: They have to let me take them in the next fiscal year, or (if I quit or get fired) pay me for them.

  456. Truth, Justice and the American way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a large company and last year, when we were all facing layoffs of thousands of employees and no raises, the CEO had the unmitigated gall to send a video to every market which we all had to sign a paper that we watched.

    In this "rah-rah" video he said, and I swear I will never forget this, we all had to buckle down and tighten our belts for the good of the company. And as a "funny" aside he whined that afterall, his children were in danger of having to attend a public university instead of an private one! He then talked about how he had gotten hell for giving himself, and all the big wig execs, a raise but that he felt it was a 'better value than his predecessor!'. His raise amount? 56%. Yes, you read that right.

    We've got people working here, slaving actually, who can't afford to send their children to a freakin' community college, and he's complaining that his precious babies may have to go to a public university and that his 56% raise is a "good value for the company". I have never been so infuriated in my life.

    Loyalty? My loyalty and dedication is to the people I work with every single day; this company can go to hell.

  457. Great Idea, I say walk out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should go ahead with the walk out, that'll show'em.

    p.s. please forward my resume to your boss:

    www.youreadumbfuck.com/resume.html

    thanks

  458. Bottom line by wuice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here is the bottom line on pretty much any job I've ever had or seen any of my friends have (with one exception): always look for a better job. If you have power in your job, leverage it. If you don't, lay low and look for a situation or a job where you will. Walk out as soon as you find a better deal. Treat the company you work for as expendable.

    Because, believe you me, this is *exactly* how they feel about you.

  459. Quit, start a company to provide... by ckm · · Score: 1

    ... consulting services back to your employer at 3x the rate....

    That's what CEO's do when they 'retire'.

    Chris.

    --
    -- I don't have a cool sig.
    1. Re:Quit, start a company to provide... by CFusion · · Score: 0

      It;s what I did too. And it works out far better for me because I get to make my own hours and got to negotiate the contract terms. i have been servicing them for 6 months now and they treat me like gold and both parties agree the relationship is far better!

      --
      I used to be a MS fan but then I was brainwashed. Now I see the Light. Mac OS X pwns u.
  460. Re:People would die faster? Bull S**T by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    Yes you sound exactly like a doctor.

    Seriously man, im being mostly tounge in cheek. (mostly ;) Its not that I don't like doctors, or don't respect them, its just that, ive worked at a hospital, ive dealt with you guys. Its impossible to work around alot of doctors for long without developing quite a sense of humor about them.

    Frankly I think its how nurses (not that I was a nurse, I was in desktop support, so I had exposure pretty much across the board). Don't get me wrong, nurses have their quirks too, they are just as insane as you doctors.

    -Steve

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  461. Ain't you talking about Schlumberger? by Swai · · Score: 1

    Schlumberger does the same with their employees and they walk out in masses too.

    I laughed out laud when I heard Schlumberger does the better to keep key employees, what they don't say is they only keep they managers who fit within the dilbert principle nicely.

    Want an example here is your answer:

    Houston did have a problem.

  462. Don't raid your retirement account! by n7ytd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Now, if you've been employed for a while, and don't even have a retirement fund big enough to support you for 6 months in an emergency, then I'd agree, you'd be an idiot.

    I was agreeing with you right up until you suggested using your retirement money to buy Doritos and pay the rent.

    So you use up your retirement account to get by until you are earning again, at which time you start replenishing your retirement, until the next layoff. Rinse, repeat, and soon you are 60 and have about 5-7 years to make up 40 years of mortgaging your future.

    There is no replacement for compound interest in saving for your retirement, and treating that money like a revolving loan means certain doom for your future. Once the money is in your retirement account(s), you must forget you ever saw it and leave it there to do it's job, which is to ensure your survival after you are no longer able to work. Planning for a rainy day is not a job for retirement funds!

  463. Re:Parent shows why you should see a lawyer *first by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ick. Exactly why a useful lawyer will tell you there's no absolute protection.

    My sympathy is utterly useless but you have it.

    If anyone needs a concrete example of how bad things can get, one company sued a group of executives who left and sold a product that their former employer had failed to develop. The argument? They said that the knowledge of what approaches were dead ends was a trade secret. Yep, the former employer said they'd succeeded because they stole the former employer's secrets of failure.

    Some of the defenses you can use are on the business side, not the legal side. They're also often out of the question:
    o Leaving on a warm, fuzzy basis. That's about as rare and difficult as a "friendly divorce".
    o Working in a field outside the former employer's business. Tough to do while using your professional skills.
    o Not working for reptilian psychos in the first place. If only they came with warning labels ...

  464. I have been on both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once I was in a company that ordered us to be on call 24 hours 7 days 52 weeks a year. Supposedly they were going to work out compensation. But the months went by and nothing happened. We called in the union. Unfortunately they were only interested in creating trouble and working up a base in the It shop which they could levereage for other disputes.

    We spoke to management and we agreed to hand back the pagers and try again later once they had their act together.

    This produced some bitter feelings... I would be very careful to involve unions in the future.

    Later, I was hired after a mass walkout. The PHB had been moved sideways as a consultant - a lot of the problems had been his management style. The payments for being on call and for callins had been fixed, and we were looked after very well.

    The guys who left did well - they became contractors. But times are hard at the moment. The 1990s are not coming back any time soon.

    One piece of advice. Do not burn your bridges behind you. Word will get around if you deliberately damage a company and you will be forever paying.

    Even if you all leave together, I would portray it as a coincidence, not a conspiracy. If you must say why you are leaving, say that the long hours are affecting your health.

    If you really have them over a barrel and they have to hire you back, do not gloat over it or rub it in. Portray it as a simple business deal.

    People hate being screwed over, even PHBs!

  465. "Executing" a mass exodus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well sometimes the outcome is that the company finds a way of executing everyone in the mass exodus.

  466. It would be more professional by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Informative

    For the lot of you to get together, and decide to act as a unit, not by walking out, but simply by working the way you think is fair, within reason.

    Draft a letter, signed by all of you, about the bad working conditions. Make a few demands, pointing out that they are perfectly reasonable: 40 hour work weeks as a rule, not an exception. No unpaid on-call time. And most importantly, no retaliation towards individuals out of your group for the time being. Point out that if people are fired from the group, the others will not take up the slack for the time being. Slow down your work to a reasonable amount, and do the work you DO choose to do well. Make it clear that you are good resources, but that you will not be pushed around due to managerial incompetence.

    It's true that you may be an important group, but so are other groups, if you change your perspective.

    You can get a lot more and be more professional than simply all walking out.

  467. Homerism by MasterMynd · · Score: 1

    I think Homer said it best.

    "If you dont like your job, you dont strike, you just go in every day and do it really half-assed, thats the american way!" -Homer Simpson

  468. corrupt unions are rare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baa-baa! Blakeh, you bleet like a typical repulican sheep. Corrupt, criminal employers are MUCH more common than corrupt unions. Please, go somewhere else with your retarded republican views.

  469. don't worry by chryptic · · Score: 1


    Youâ(TM)ll be laid off soon when the company dies. From my experience that is what normally happens. At least thatâ(TM)s what happened the last three times I went through the same situation

    --
    The two most common things in the Universe are hydrogen and stupidity. -- Harlan Ellison
  470. Unemployed by r1ckt3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had something similar happen with an ISP I worked for. The entire engineering team walked, including the senior tech that had built the entire network from the ground up. Never heard from them after that.

  471. Grapes of Wrath by TeachingMachines · · Score: 1


    The language of the parent post is disturbing in its own right:

    "...you were all sh*t disturbers..."
    "Nobody needs agitators..."
    "rightly brand you as a trouble maker."

    One need only pick up a copy of John Steinbeck's "The Grapes of Wrath" to see that you have unwittingly plagiarized the witticisms of "employers" during the Great Depression. Individuals who attempted to organize themselves and protest against the poor (understatement) working conditions were called "agitators," "trouble makers," and "reds" (i.e., communists) and were placed on blacklists (i.e., blackballed) that prevented them from getting work anywhere else. It was the formation of unions that saved our workforce from tyrants who made sure that mass revolt wasn't possible.

    --

    The Death Penalty: Killing people to show others that killing people is wrong.
  472. welcome to the real world pussy by the+real+higgy · · Score: 0

    OH look,a slashdotter finds himself in the real world,lets all shed a tear.........get over yourself and move on. punk ass!

  473. and you do what exactly? (at work) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    it is a roller coaster in regards to how employees are treated and the "bang for your buck" (efficiency, service, quality, etc factored against price). There are of course many cause and effect relations between the two, but that is not what I am rambling about here. No, I think that now we are at a point in which it is better for the economy, the customers, and the employees if more break off companies are formed.

    Some erroneously say things like, "the sign of a mature industry (or that which is reaching maturity) is mass consolidation. Nothing could be further from the truth. Mature means stable here and if the market does not reflect the Industry then it is most definitely NOT mature. I personally think that in the next 30 years we will see a wealth of innovation thanks to small mom and pop business becoming more the norm. Sure at the end of that 30 years we will probably once again see a mass consolidation and then go through another cycle of mass incompetence, corruption, bureaucracy and general stupidity but then we will then fire up the small business escape algorithm once again.

    The problem as always is that the entrenched bureaucratic Industry will not resort to competing to win, but will choke out and destroy annoying competition through its army of lawyers and shady wanna-be ASSassin suits. I hate to call them businessmen because a businessman focuses not on eliminating competition but on cultivating such a following that they are the first choice as decided by the market.

    However, fear not if you are a worthless manager (by name, not by action) as there is always government contracting. A nice little (hehe) socialist system in which competition is frowned upon and Red Party favortism is the accepted method of business. If you have the best product/service at the best price and compared to the competition are ahead in everything from extensibility and consulting based or just out of the box adaptability to that of being the most secure and such... then I sure hope you have hired a couple of O-6's and above and even better some deputy directors and above of the various agencies. If you have not then try sticking to the capitalist world as government contracting may not be the best thing for you.

  474. Sorry, can't help it by levin · · Score: 1

    In Communist Russia, Exodus results in Mass Departmental Execution!

    --

    `which fortune`
  475. Or as Homer would say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A thought... you could just "slow down". Work slowly, stop doing things, make sure you only put in 40 hrs / week.

    "Lisa, if you don't like your job, you don't strike! You just go in every day and do it really half-assed. That's the American way."

  476. Vast Overpopulation = You have NO value. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Employers do not care how talented you are, or how
    much you contribute to the good and well-being of the company, ie "how well the customers are served".
    To think otherwise is to ignore one truth:

    The world is vastly overpopulated with willing workers.
    Why is this?
    l. Advances in medicine and nutrition.
    2. Control of timeless scourges such as the mosquito, and various diseases, such as Influenza.
    3. Hunger and famine in the developed world has been almost eliminated.(That's where you work)
    4.The limited impact of wars, probably caused by the rise of democratic governments. One example: We now know that General Douglas McArthur wanted to use quite a few A-Bombs in the Korean war, but this didn't happen when he was fired by President Truman.
    Another: Democratic governments such as USA and Britain stopped the Nazis from developing A-bombs, which Hitler would have used "a lot of" had they been developed.
    USA and Britain did not use WWII bombing methods in Iraq, so less than 4000 Iraqi citizens were killed. In WWII, whole cities were bombed with devices that were designed to set the entire city on fire, killing many many thousands in one raid. President Truman thought he had to use the A-Bomb because an invasion of Japanese home islands was to have cost up to a million U.S. servicemen's lives.

    So, many many people live, no longer in fear of death from war, famine or disease. Employers can pay low wages, and if you complain, you can just go out the same way you came in, and they don't care.

  477. Past employers can't disparage you. by Glom · · Score: 1

    I heard that if somthing the past employer says causes you not to get a job, they are liable.

    1. Re:Past employers can't disparage you. by dubious9 · · Score: 1

      I've heard of this before as well, but only in the cast of lying and non-work related insults. If you performed poorly at a previous job, then the person you worked for, AFAIK, has every right to tell anybody about your performance, including prospective employers. Your prospective employer in return has every right not to hire you for that reason.

      It's hard to sue and win against somebody who was only telling the truth. In any case, burning bridges will hurt you in the long run.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    2. Re:Past employers can't disparage you. by mwtown · · Score: 1

      Ok, Here's how I've been led to understand it (IANAL):

      Previous employers can't say anything bad about you. They can say all the good things they want, but if they overtly say anything bad that causes you to not get the job, you may have cause to sue them for slander/libel (depending on spoken or written, obviously). The bitch is in proving they did it.

      There's ways around this, of course. You can choose not to give any good information when asked ("So, any other information you want to give about their performance, other than dates worked?" "No, not really."). This would probably imply that you don't have anything good to say, without having to get yourself in trouble.

      The other option is to make it company policy that only employment dates can be given and nothing else. The caveat is that most of the time, you will need to state that it's policy so that it can't be mis-construed as a possible negative reference (I have at least 3 past employers that have this policy. It works well to eliminate liability on their part).

  478. similar question by bigmase521 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have some similar questions to the authors.

    Lets say a person is hired by a company, hourly not salaried, to do system administration. Well throughout the employment the person was asked to do a website for the company. The site isn't finished yet, and still being worked on daily in addition to normal sys admin tasks. The conditions at the workplace have deteriorated rapidly and the pay certainly isn't consummate to the workload. If the person were to leave whether it be by resignation or laid off, what are the legal rights the person has in terms of taking the code for the website with him when he goes? Whether or not the company folds or stays in business seems irrelevant in this case, but if the person leaves and decides to take the website and any other work he's done with him, what are the legal ramifications of doing this? Mind you it's not a contract position, and there is no contract at all, and certainly nothing about ownership of code, project schedule etc.

    --
    "I didn't come here to tell you how this is going to end. I came here to tell you how it's going to begin"
  479. Walking out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did this once working as a bus boy. The boss was irrational, even paranoid. He decided one evening to mircomanage getting the restaurant ready for opening and interrupted every necessary task, telling us to get started on something else. After nothing got done on time, he then attempted to blame his staff. I explained that he would need a new busboy next week and then the other busboy, both waitresses, and the hostess told him the same thing.

    The upshot was counter-intuitive. None of us quit, we all recieved raises, and I was promoted to waiter. The lesson I learned was that employers need staff, managers need staff, and they occasionally need to be reminded of this.

  480. Don't you just love it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When your comment is deleted by /.
    You can have half a century of work experience to back up the information in your post, and all that gets you is a big fat Zero here. No sense telling all these young people what will happen to them!, Let them find out for themselves! Well, I tried.

  481. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Have you ever been warned before your employer goes out of business? I never have.


    Make friends with the accounting folks, especially if you're in a small company where it is easier to mingle with the higher ups. I remember one staff meeting about 1 month before the first round of layoffs occured: The CEO said things were going good, not as great as they had hoped (one contract had refused to pay on time), but even with that, they (the company) was break-even for the year (ie: If the contract had paid, they would have made a profit of a few million).

    After the meeting, the head accountant mentioned (privatly, of course), that, yes, on the surface that this was true, but that was failed to be mentioned were that the upcoming payments, bills, bribes (Ex corporate officer made off with millions, and is on a plan to recieve more money each year for so many years to keep from going to court), etc. That things were not looking good.

    1 month later, they fired the temps at corporate hq (3 out of 48 people), three months later, the fired the remaining 75% of the corporate headquarters, moved the business development division out of state, and let got rid of the CEO. (Who was actually concerned about the people who worked at the company. I visited with him, and even worked on his home computer, so I got to know him a bit.)

    Listening to the accountant, I learned that the company was on shaky grounds, and wasn't supprised to be laid off. Even if I survived both rounds of lay-offs, I would be looking for another job, as this company is effectivly in clean-up mode.
  482. companies won't touch you as a group... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 0

    Have heard of this happening lots...especially during dot-bomb when companies were taking advantage (like you said, long hours etc to help cut costs)...you have to have the cash to start something yourself (which takes a lot of work and $$) because no other company will touch you as a group (especially if it's a small programming community like some of them out there)...the one thing that goes through the heads of prospective employers it that if they take on the group, then they'll have no control over them...nothing to stop them walking out again. And if you're the ringleader, or one of them...no one will touch you...no one wants to hire a developer that has the power to pull and entire department away from the company...watch out...could be a long time in an unemployement queue if you get a bad rep from this.

    1. Re:companies won't touch you as a group... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is just plain wrong. A team that is tried and proven is a huge asset to any corporation. The fact that they have pulled up and left as a team shows loyalty to each other, and the desire for something better. Hiring a team like that is a good choice....a good choice if you are a proper business who is willing to treat your employees well and has a desire to keep them.

      It is your responsibility as the company hiring them to inspire loyality from this team. They are in need or recongnition and reward and if given it will produce far better than an unconnected team that you hire sporadically.

      Exercise caution, and perform due dilligence on them, but I look for teams like this in my hiring decisions.

  483. It all depends on how you play your cards... by jpiterak · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Heh...

    It's funny that this topic comes up occasionally. Let me tell you a (true) story.

    About a decade ago, I was working for a medium-sized computer retailer. I had just joined the technical services group, and work was brisk.

    This group was responsible for providing technical support both for internal systems, and for fulfilling external customer support contracts.

    This was back in the time when there was still some money to be made selling hardware in a retail environment, but when margins were already starting to fall. It was pretty obvious to everyone that the happy days of Porsche-driving salespersons was coming to a close.

    This company had the answer half-right in that they saw computer services as a way to stretch their profit margins on their computer sales. More importantly, though, they saw professional services as a way to get into customers that they would normally have no access to.

    Where they still had blinders on, though, was that they were at their root a retail sales organization. Everything revolved around the salesperson's ability to close the sale. If that meant that services - either basic configuration or detailed consulting and programming - had to be provided at a cut rate, that was fine as long as the company closed the hardware sale.

    The problem was that the services group had their own P&L and budget. Worse, we didn't get credit for the hardware sale in any form. Add to this, our ability to charge-back our services costs (especially when they were discounted), was minimal. But our compensation was based on our P&L.

    We were able to offset this for a while by selling services contracts somewhat outside of the regular retail sales chain, but soon even that was being eaten away when the company brought in dedicated sales people to sell support contracts under a different group.

    What all this meant was that we were all working 60+ hour weeks with less and less pay.

    So we started to plan.

    The manager of the group started delaying the close of most of the support and development contracts 'in the pipe,' at the same time that the services support sales group was doing a great job of selling contracts. He also rented office space and convinced the rest of us in the group that things were not going to get better staying with the company. We could do better on our own.

    On July 5th (yes, the timing was deliberate), he had a meeting with the management of the company, where he handed them letters of resignation for the entire group. We had also coordinated our mass resignation with the resignation of the person responsible for supporting the POS system for the company.

    So now this company had NO technical support people, a large number of signed support contracts, and a large number of hardware sales contingent on cut-rate support and installation. They had already purchased much of the inventory for these sales, and faced a cash-crunch if they were unable to make the delivery.

    We offered them a way out.

    All they had to do was transfer all of the previously-sold contracts to us... We would take them over, essentially without compensation, but with the ability to renew the contracts under the new company. All the contracts in the pipe would be 're-sold' to the new company, so that we had an instant source of income. Additionally, we would be available to help the old company's corporate sales division continue to close higher-end customers, in return for ongoing access to their customer list.

    So...

    It's almost 10 years later, and our original parent company has long-since dive-bombed, folded, and dissolved into oblivion.

    If you walk into the front door of our office, you'll probably notice the one out-of-place piece of art in our otherwise utilitarian-geek environs... It's a sculpture of a golden goose that used to sit on the CEO's desk at our old employer.

    Sometimes things DO work out right.

  484. No need for dramatics by mehip2001 · · Score: 1

    Years ago I was unknowlingly part of a mass departure from a company.

    The co. I worked for at the time was generaly screwing over everybody on our team and each and every one of us were looking for new positions.

    It just happened that 18 of 20 person team that had developed and supported the co's core product jumped ship in a 5 week period.

    The company was never able to recover and went belly up. That gave me far more satisfaction that a childish tantranum could ever had.

    --
    Just for the record, there is NO "off the record" record.
    Make a record of that.
  485. Exactly. People acting immorally 'cause they can. by jonskerr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the economy sucks, the capitalists rape the employees, demanding more and more, squeezing them like a lemon for their drinks. When the economy booms, the employees demand more and more for themselves.
    What's the difference? People are acting like shits either way, and they're both doing wrong, but you also have to look at where the harm is. Do I harm the company by demanding more money and benefits? Maybe; they factor that into their costs. If they can't make money the company tanks. But: the executives do the same thing whether the economy is good or bad and often, these days, drive the company into the ground themselves.
    On the other hand if the company squeezes the employees, the employees suffer not just hurt, but harm. They don't like the stress; yeah it's unpleasant, but there are also real-world effects from this stress. Their health suffers. Their families suffer. When the employee comes home and has half an hour to eat, clean house, discipline their kids and try to come down from a bad day, something important is going to get skipped. Their children end up being raised by Jerry Springer and MTV. A frustrated employee lashes out at their spouse, their kids, and everyone they encounter. That anger passes into society, and the poorly-raised children grow up to commit crimes, or have emotional problems. People have all this money and no time to spend it living life, so they throw it away in empty consumerism. The employee is now driving a vehicle twice the size of a '75 Buick, and the environment is filled with pollution and garbage as all this crud spreads throughout the world.

    All due to the greed of the company.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  486. More then you by soppyfrog · · Score: 1

    Spare a thought for those overworked nurses and doctors of our emergency rooms and hospitals.

  487. Lawyers put in worse hours by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Sure, it's not the same everywhere, but go read "The Firm" by John Grisham. (no, no, no, don't see the lame-oid Tom Cruise movie about it, read the *book*, or listen to the audio book...)

    Lawyers who are in their own practices can control their hours like most other professionals, and lawyers for governments or corporations generally get treated like other employees there, but junior partners in law firms pretty much get treated like harassed overworked programmers except they've also got to wear suits and aren't supposed to shoot each other with Nerf-foam rockets over their cubicle tops.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  488. Unions in the tech industry? by arashiken · · Score: 1

    I don't work in the software side of things (I repair hardware in bank machines), but the concerns most of you bring up seem to suggest that an organized union would benefit IT workers. Has anyone ever tried forming one in a tech company? If Macdonald's employees can make it happen (happened to one in BC) surely the educated can do it.

  489. A company that truly deserved it... mid-90s by billstewart · · Score: 1
    A bit earlier than that, friends of mine worked at a database company that was bought by a large company that buys other companies and drains the money out of them, killing off most of the development and milking the product for what it's worth as a maintenance product. The buyer basically gave them a "Be our slaves or leave by the end of the week" offer. So they pretty much all left. One event that happened in the process was that there was a list of a dozen or so key developers that they didn't want to lose, and somebody "found" it. So those dozen developers walked in together to all resign.

    This was after the late-80s boom and the early-90s slump, but before the internet boom made Silicon Valley totally silly. It was about as close to a normal market as things get around here. Most of them did pretty well.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  490. Loyalty Does not exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    here is the scenario:

    After my first year as IT Manager I orchestrate a major building move (Data wiring, PBX programming, etc.) I could have quit in the middle of the project (to get more money), but I didn't. The reward for that, no Christmas bonus (the year before I got $600 for doing nothing). The excuse: money is tight. PHB had a nice laugh as he drove home in his 2001 Porsche 911 (NOT KIDDING). That is what started it. I had bitch for raises that were promised to me, and perhaps the most frustrating thin of all is dealing with managment that has NO technical skill and is not interested in acquiring any. (After two years, I still got a call from PHB at home because his printer was jammed.)

    Then my wife gave me the best birthday present ever. She said I could quit and her income would suffice. So I gave it a week (to make sure finances were correct) and then I quit on them. Why no two week notice?Good question. These guys were assholes. I watched time and again as they laid off people who had worked there for more than 4 years with no warning. Come to work, "let go" bu lunch. No severance package, NADA. This pissed me off, so I decided not to give them any warning.

    The morning I quit, Vice Pres calls from Mexico. First thing out of his mouth "Do you want more money" FSCK YOU!!!!!!! Where was that money at Christmas? Or if I deserve more money, where is my raise? Quitting was the best damn thing I ever did. I am now self-emplyed and will never look back. My advice, always look out for yourself. I don't care if you and your boss wife swap, you are NOT friends and they will can you in a moments notice.

  491. Been there, done it. by dumboy · · Score: 1

    And it was great. We walked out in the morning, went up the street and got breakfast. Half way through breakfast we realized that we *probably* should have picked up our paychecks first. DOH! We all finished our breakfast, went back for our paychecks, and were met be a much friendlier management team that was all of a sudden very concerned about what we had to say. We kept our jobs and the main manager that was the problem lost hers. The whole experience was incredible.

  492. form your own company by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    If you feel your doing a good job and like the job but not the way you're treated by your employer then why not start your own company? Take your whole group at once and let your current employer know they can hire your new company. If you work as a group you have more power. Of course be sure you have enough savings to afford the jump. :)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  493. manager vs managed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's funny. All the responses fall into one of two categories: 1)the manager response, i.e., "you should feel lucky that you even have a job", and 2) the worker bee response, "be careful how you do it, but jump ship."

    This is what works for me. Make some serious job inquiries. Determine your market worth and make a list of your acceptable working conditions. Then, make a professional proposal to your management. Maybe do this as a group. Let them know that you are seriously thinking about leaving and let them know why (never underestimate the how unaware managers can be). I bet that your company will make some sort of compromise with you and make you professional life happier without your having to leave the job that you once loved.

    Hey, it can't hurt.

  494. It happened during the boom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I worked for a Data Imaging Company, originally started at AMR. We had our own imaging program that would scan the images (applications, bilss,etc) and ship the stuff to Santo Domingo to be keyed. I was an operations weenie. We were bought out by a larg company... they wanted our market share, not our expertise. Even though we were responsible for 60% of the revenue for the division, they weren't in the software business and decided to shut us down after two years.

    Their offering to stay was pathetic. So the programmers and VP got together and told them they were forming their own company, and would offer support. If they didn't want this deal, that was OK because every one of the programmers had job offers elsewhere. Black mail? I like to think of it as shrewd work politics. Within two years they were a multi million dollar support company. But after the dot-bomb, I've lost contact with them.

    Personally I got a job at an ISP and doubled my pay within a year. Which was a lot better than what that company was offering to stay for the same amount of time, a non-guarenteed $10K (you know the old, if-you-do-everything-right-but-we-won't-tell-you-w hat-is-right-until-it's-time-to-pay-out clause).

    I tend to think this scenerio worked for two reasons. First, it was an in-house product. You're pretty much screwed for support if you lose the people. Second, the programmers had somewhere else to go. So continued work for that company was purely by choice. That is something we (Sysadmins, tech people, etc) don't have today! I'm still amazed that my current ISP employer pays good $$ to kids, and I mean kids, who can't even look at a log file when there are so many intelligent, responsible people out there who are out of work and willing to work for far less $$ just to stay in the field.

    So unless you have a holy grail that only your group creates and supports, I would think twice.

  495. IWW? by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    Granpa told me about them in the 30's it stood for
    I Won't Work

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  496. Have You Ever by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    Gotten a paycheck from a poor man?

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  497. Re:Why does Bush Hate America? caliphate of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's Sara Freeman?

  498. This is bullshit. by potnoodle · · Score: 0

    Who cares what managers think. Their ACTIONS speak for themselves. Managers sure know how to talk their way around the mess they often leave behind them but not everyone is dumb to the point of actually believing what they say. Sure, there is the occasional brilliant manager out there. I must have seen maybe, three, in ten years. The rest deserve all the contempt and suspicion you can think of, with good reason : they're all looking after number one and screw everyone else, especially anyone underneath them, because they usually can get away with it. Of course, some people say that you shouldn't think like that because it's going to harm your career. Ha! That's right, bend over for the Man ! He sure will thank you for it ! But reward you ? Keep dreaming. Only exceptional organizations driven by truly gifted people get any real respect from the lower echelons. They are quite rare. Being clever is not showing that contempt and suspicion until you are ready to make your move. It is NOT disneyland out there, people !

    1. Re:This is bullshit. by smack.addict · · Score: 1
      I really feel sorry for you. I am willing to bet good money you will never succeed.

      Of course, brilliant managers are occasional... just as are abusive managers. The rest are, by and large, about average. Yet you are lumping all manageers in with the few bad ones.

      As to the comment they are all out looking for #1... damn straight, everyone is. Obviously you are. The difference between a good manager and a bad one is recognizing that the success of the people who work for him is in his own best interest.

      I do truly feel sorry for you.

    2. Re:This is bullshit. by potnoodle · · Score: 0

      I like the way you avoid mentioning that
      the workplace is another place where power struggles go on.

      Why would you? As I imagine you are a manager it would not be in your interest to mention it because you probably exercise that very power over
      other people. Maybe rightly so because you
      are more clever or better educated.

      I am simply reminding the slaves underneath you
      to watch out because power corrupts.
      And in a power struggle between you and some
      body you can fire at a near whim on your part
      it is not exactly an equal fight is it ?

      You may be a good person, but experience
      dictates caution and suspicion for the more vulnerable people.
      Success of the people under
      you is very basic manager duty and should be obvious to all except the crassest retard.

      I feel sorry for you for the way you rate success as the rank you get to in a hierarchy (and of course the money that comes with it) instead of just the plain old pursuit of happiness.

      As for my own success, I've moved on from manning
      the phones to a highly paid consulting job in under 7 years so I think I'm already there, thanks.

      Oh, and keep your patronizing tone for your drones,not me.

  499. Skill levels by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    one skill level, even most people can see that some are better than others at somthing. while Mr A is a code whiz Ms B can clean his clock at repairing an air conditioner I know that I am a hell of a lot better with a welding stinger than I am with a keyboard.

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  500. Don't you get it by joepress · · Score: 1

    Corp. America is about getting the job done.
    The job doesn't have to be done right, just done.
    Go ahead and walk off the job. You won't be missed.
    Things at work may be worse than when you were there but life will go on.
    If the place is run so poorly that it will suffer you r loss, it will probably fail with or without you.
    Get the resume together - NOW.

  501. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent AND grandparent posts are GREAT!!! I have personally witnessed both.

    I think the bigger the company the more chances you have for your boss to help you, as it only takes his word to the HR department. He says how good you are, and you get a little extra. Of course they usually pay less, following a pre-defined scale. If you take a pro-active approach the boss appreciates your honesty, he knows more, itâ(TM)s not his money and his position is not in jeopardy. If the business need to cut, they will cut whole groups, not just employees here and there.

    On the other hand a âstartupâ(TM) style pays a lot more when you get in, and ask for a lot more work time and diversity of talent, but when things starts going bad, they are a lot harsher.

    And believe me, the worst is when the âmanager/leaderâ(TM) between you and the CTO or CEO is getting squeezed too. He will not move a finger to help, and use anyone as a scapegoat each chance he gets. To him your complaint only mean he his doing things wrong (and are often right about it). The last thing he needs is your negative comments. When the cuts start, itâ(TM)s usually the name they heard the most often with negative comments that goes first. So he dont want to you talking to his boss, and you better make sure he does not talk about you in a negative way.

    And of course in the startup the 26 year old CTO will NOT cut his benefits, he will give hell all around, because he donâ(TM)t really know why things are so bad, and the next thing you know everybody are covering their asses. And the spiral of death is started.

    Our CEO announced cutbacks in 2001, a few employees let go, vacations cut and no salary increase for the year, then left for 3 weeks of vacation in February, just after the X-mas vacations!!! You bet everyone was so motivated and respectful after that one.

    Oh! And new investors making your stock options worth 1 cent, but we are keeping the exercise price at 1.40, and âoerevising the strike price is probably illegalâ.

  502. Nice ivory tower thinking by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1

    How much money would I need to defeat the army of lawyers Cisco could hire and how many years of litigation would drag on before the contract was thrown out? Whether it's illegal or not doesn't mean shit if you can't afford to defeat it.

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
    1. Re:Nice ivory tower thinking by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      How much money would I need to defeat the army of lawyers Cisco could hire and how many years of litigation would drag on before the contract was thrown out? Whether it's illegal or not doesn't mean shit if you can't afford to defeat it.

      Even an army of lawyers can't "drag on" a case that's based on a provision in an employment contract that is explicitly prohibited by federal law. There's no weaseling room when the NLRA and Norris-LaGuardia Act specifically prohibit such provisions. True, they could sue the bejesus out of you six ways from sunday for all sorts of other things, and those suits may well drag on forever; but there's one thing I can tell you: a suit against you for a)joining a union or b)organizing fellow workers will fail because federal law protects these activities. End of story.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  503. Been there, done just that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in a similar situation a year ago. It was a small company that had the idea of growing into a big company, but had no action plan, and no idea how they were going to get there. All the staff had gel'd into the best team I have ever had the pleasure to work with. As the company was small, we were all being paid less than we were worth, but the idea of helping something to grow was exciting.

    After about a year and a half with the company we realised that all the "good ideas" about growing big were just dreams and talk. The team got together, came up with ideas to help the business, and sat down with the owners to come up with an action plan -- result, a lot of hopping around by management but again with no direction, and no result. We figured if we have to manage management then it is time to leave. A couple of the guys broke away shortly after that to start there own business. I lasted until just after a vacation. I came back from that vacation ALIVE, and realized just how much the job stress was killing me, and gave my notice a week after returning.

    In a fortunate turn of events. The day after my last day at the old job, I was being flown off to interview for a job that quadrupled my previous salary. My quitting the old job that was dragging me down, put me in the right place at the right time to land a big time job that I love, and that pays be extremely well. Had I not quit that job, I would never have had the opportunity that I have now.

    I was fortunate. Things could have turned out differently, but if you are unsatisfied with your life, and too scared to try and make it better, then you will always be unsatisfied. If you keep trying to make it better, and face the fears and uncertainties, then you will face hard times and frustration....but these will pass, because you will also find success somewhere along that road!

    Life is too damn short! Start looking for the life you want now!

  504. If you are a UNIX/Linux/OSS shop... by smashwolf · · Score: 1

    The end result will be that the company suddenly switches entirely to Microsoft products,a nd outsources the entire IT organization, not just your department, and that's the end of it. Then they make a big public announcement that they restructured, and cut a lot of jobs, stock goes up briefly, and they disavow all knowledge of your existance.

  505. Re:Why does Bush Hate America? caliphate of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sandra Keller aka Sultaana Sultana Freeman

    Not Sara Freeman, sorry, it is: Sandra Keller, who married Mark Freeman, aka: Abdul-Maalik Freeman, now she is Sultaana Freeman, aka, Sultaana Kaiana Myke Freeman.

    Like all cults, Islam greets members. She used to be Christian. She was photographed for a mug-shot for abusing foster children. Islam makes people beat children. Anyways, her mug shot.

    See the cycle of abuse and cultism... Looks like the kids would have been better off raised Christian so they didn't have to suffer abuse in their formative years.

    Murder supporter, death monger, killer of God's Creation, Agent of Satan, False Prophet, Hubris laden psychotic cultist bastard. We will find you and catch you in the act of wrong doing and then make your familiar with law, order and the mores of productive, progressive society.

  506. Re:Why does Bush Hate America? caliphate of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look:
    The Islamic terrorists and the society that encourages them, fosters them, promotes them, idolizes them, chooses to murder non military targets unprovoked.

    Like rich people paying progressively more taxes for no reason better than they have more to loose, the US and other well developed countries have a knack for kicking your fucking head in for pissing in the cake mix, we have more to loose. Being on top only has one direction to go in: down.

    You fucking cult doesn't understand diplomacy, talks, understanding. Your cultist religion precludes functional governments, shown over and over again for centuries, it precludes science, reason, feeding the majority of the indigenous population.

    We are sick of Islam the cult and Muslims trying to pull us down by cheating. You animals have no educational institutions to speak of, your mind is clouded by deprecated religion and law, your governments define the meaning of corruption, your beliefs are incongruent with rational thinking.

    I invite you to beat us fair and square... Try writing better software, or build a better mousetrap. Even excessively small countries like Sweden, only 9 million people, can make planes, cell phones, cars, etc.

    Your foul, disgusting 1 billion strong cult of Islam cant do anything. Nothing. You fucking retards cant make shit. You do nothing. You amount to nothing. You are modern uruk-hai, disposable minions of a dark lord and dark force. You are only powerful because of your number. Your inventions are primitive. Your methods are primitive. And we will slice you at the neck when you pop your head out of the swamp because we are tired, having suffered the least, already of having buildings blown up and whiney bitching idle threats and towel-headed burka bitches infect our lives.

    Your backward, unaccomplished hordes of cultist shit will defeated by logic, or you will succeed in destroying our race.

  507. We did just that.... by rick_lester · · Score: 1

    I worked at a place that was exactly as you describe. We were the engineering dept. and the upper management made commitments to customers that we had to keep. I personally was working 70+ hours a week for months with one 93 hour week. We had to fill out time cards so everyone was aware of the workload. We asked for but were given NO compensation (time off or money). It went from one project to the next until the entire department was pressed to work those hours. We had a meeting and discussed our options. We shot our resume's out to the headhunters and some of us waited for those that had to have a job to find one. It didn't take long. We then left, all 10 of us. They still haven't recovered.

  508. Try the "rule flu" approach: follow the rules by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
    To make your point, try following EVERY RULE the corporation has that governs your work to the letter. It should constipate them completely.

    Do not do anything until requests are submitted through official channels, signed by the appropriate managers, with all the forms filled out. If there are contradictory rules, do nothing. If someone wants you to override a procedure, ask them for permission to do so, in writing, signed by theur manager.

  509. Which part of the following sentence ... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... you don't understand:

    "I am leaving the company, I don't give a rat ass about what they do".

    Now again, what about those replacements?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  510. Scrooge LIVES! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
    "They fired just about everyone else the day after the Christmas party"

    One employer I had laid off half their technical writers by making the announcements during a whole-office staff meeting just before the Christmas lunch party ... after spending several thousands on each of us to train us in some expensive publishing software. When the economy dragged istelf out of the gutter, they couldn't hire anyone back. I wonder why.

  511. How it is different? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Simply, an employee is in no position to demand outrageous stuff from their employer, neither during good not bad times.

    In the other hand, during good times the company can demand that you are fully devoted to it (we are growing!We can't keep up with demand! Work 80 hours for us please!) and during bad times even more so (if you don't work 80 hours we will go under! ).

    Think: would you ask any service provider to work for your for fre one or two hours? No, most probably because you lack any leverage as an employer. Companies on the other hand can demand that and more and most people do not have the balls to say "no, please read my contract" or just to ignore the request.

    WHen I sign a 9 to 5 contract of employment I do work from 9 to 5. Do you want me to work extra? Show me the money baby, that applies to any time?

    Will they replace me? Maybe, then I will adjust to the new market lowering my expectations, I will sign a contract and I will not do anything more that waht is absolutely required.

    This policy has served me well for many stress free years of full employment in many companies.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  512. Stop whining. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The US is not in a recession, there are many jobs out there, not all on IT, not all where you live.

    Retrain and relocate and you will never suffer unemployment for long.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Stop whining. by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      Retrain and relocate and you will never suffer unemployment for long.

      Well, I have something like 10 years of experience in systems integration, network management, design, and various security disciplines related thereto. I also have a wife and three kids. Do you really think I can get up to speed in foodservice fast enough to make, say, half of what I was making in 1998?

      Lucky for you I don't necessarily have to worry, as I have a job making more than I made in 1998, which makes you as presumptive as you are insensitive. I wasn't whining. Most of my friends lost their jobs and not all of them have new ones yet. This is reality. To expect someone to take a 10K/year part time starter job in heavy equipment when they have 50K/year in obligations and years invested in their IT skillset is arrogant in the extreme.

  513. Is not personla pride. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    It is personal interests.

    I always weight my interests first, those are the ones that dictate the decisions I take.

    My company is not my family, my friends or my live. People that fail to understand this and make clear demarcations find themselves victims of sentimental blackmailing like the one you use.

    I have seen so many times the most loyal and commited employees being royaly scre%ed that it amazes me there are still people out there believing all this tired "do it for the company" crap.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  514. And as an employee.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... we know that and say what you want to hear: "oh yessss, I will stick around until hell freezes over" and will give you a double speak about why we left with th uptmost regret but wishing them all the best.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  515. Re:MOD PARENT UP! This is a more realistic view .. by o'reor · · Score: 1
    Oh, jayzus (excuse my Irish-tainted French). I didn't realize it was that bad in the UK at the moment (assuming you're in the UK ?). Hope you don't have to live in London or nearby, though (renting a flat is a ripoff in that area).

    Right now in France, we're struggling against a Thatcherization of the economy and of social conditions. Yeah, call us strike-prone, lazy, cheese-eating surrendering monkeys if you like (though this sounds more like US neocon drivel), but this is a battle I'm not willing to lose. And it looks like if we lose this battle, the French Socialist Party won't be any more help than the Labour is at the moment in the UK...

    Cheers

    --
    In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  516. Follow The Numbers! by crusher-1 · · Score: 1

    Ok, so your claiming the company is in deep fiscal shit. So first what would the impact of a mass defection/departure of your departments personnel have on the company. If, as you contend, that it is essential and an integral part of the company's ability to conduct business, and hence stay solvent then it might be assumed that your people are in a position of some power.

    Now, if it proves correct that leaving would cripple the company in a meaningful way look at those in upper management. Do the CEO, department presidents/VP's, CFO's, CIO/CTO's, etc, etc, yada yada still get compensations like quarterly bonuses? Is the CIO and CEO salary on a scale that equals x times so many workers?

    The point is this. IF your department is getting done to them what so many corporations are doing as SOP. That is they are scaling down the work force to cut expenditures while mandating more responsiblity and increasing the workload. All the while kicking out bonuses and financial percs to the upper echelon with a continuing stream of revenue and returns for the share holders, then it may very well be time to send a message to the whitest of collars that it is unacceptable to continue with this form of exploitation of the work force.

    All too often we have seen companies and corporations that force layoffs, increase work loads, mandate overtime without compensation while the executives continue to experience the same, if not increasing, profits and percs. It must be realized that if upper management or the market has taken a hit to a company that putting the thumb to the work force without having the share holders, board members and chief executives share in the hard times is unacceptable. Often times the bonuses and other percs, like plump retirement packages, amount to the cost of a whole division. This is done on the perception that a qualified CEO can benefit the company in a way the garners both a lucrative and competitive edge. However, if the company is failing financially it can be construed that management has failed as well. So it needs to be realized the punishing the workers for the captains inability to guide the ship is no longer going to be tolerated. Until this becomes a trend expect CEO's and other high end execs to get richer regardless of their or their company's performance and workers to be expected to do more for less.

  517. IBEW represents IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Contact the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and ask to talk to someone in organizing for communications sector. I am a brother and some IT departments are union. Move only as a unit, however. If someone refuses to walkout, you are screwed.

  518. Almost perfect. by charlieo88 · · Score: 1

    Almost but not quite. Produce two different resignation letters. One giving two weeks notice. The other terminating your employment immediately. Clean out all your personal crap before taking the letters to the right person, you may not get to come back for it later. In person, tell them you are leaving the company. You then negotiate the severance. Get what you want, you give them the one with the two weeks.

  519. That applies equally to any industry. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    So what is the point exactly?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  520. If a company suck so bad ... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... that you have to resort to this measures I am pretty sure that there is no trining whatsoever.

    Thus, if you take a couple of office hours to re-train each other, for the life of mine I can't see how that would be considered "cheating the company[tm]"

    Manager: What the hell are you doing you lot?
    CodeMonkey: We are teaching each other our valuable skilz.
    Manager: but you are cheating on comPANY TIME! Your days are numberd nerds.
    CodeMonkey: uh, you promised 2 weeks of training per year last time. That was 5 years ago and we have had none, so we are taking things on our hands.
    Manager: carry on boyz! Iniciative, I love people with iniciative... ..... :-P

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  521. Re:No, but...[continued] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but did he make the mat? yes he did! might take a full bpdy cast: but its possible.

  522. Answers by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Why are you looking for a job?

    Because the current (or previous if you are brave and organized) one was not fullfilling my needs, ambitions and potential.

    Why did you leave your previous job?

    The company was clearly abusing the trust I have deposited on it during the time I was employed by them. They made unreasonable requests that were never met with appropiate recognization or compensation.

    Would your former employer rehire you?

    I don't know, you have to ask that to them.

    So waht exactly is your point?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Answers by asr_man · · Score: 1

      My point is that unless the interviewer is already hooked on you as a candidate, answers that are loaded with negativity will quickly lower your chances of an offer.

      I like your first answer. It's honest without being negative. And it invites me as an interviewer to find out about what makes you tick. It prompts the question "So what *are* our needs and ambitions?" Make sure your answers sound carreer-minded.

      Second answer is judgemental. It is fine to disclose what you didn't like about your previous employer but try not to sound eager to condemn. You don't want to sound like you're carrying your axe with you to the interview. Project an image of happiness to be taking responsibility to move on with your life.

      Last answer is a major red flag, assuming your interviewer has an ounce of competence. The next thought in the interviewer's mind is: "If I decide I am interested in this candidate (not so sure now) I will have to call their previous employer and find out why this person "doesn't know". Though I bet he does know." Now, even if you previous employer accepted your resignation willingly, the fact that they would like to avoid lawsuits about about recommendations will make them avoid negative comments if possible. So make it easy for them: steer your interviewer towards the skills you exercised that made you valuable and mention that "they'd rehire me for those skills, but that under the current conditions they may not hire a replacement at all" (assuming that applies).

      Being genuine about your feelings is fine, unless your goal is to get a job. In front of a interviewer you never, never want to project negativity. Just two things: "I am the perfect candidate for this position" and "I want the job".

  523. Re:Communicate, people! Communicate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, you're ripe for The Capital by good old Marx.

  524. Re:What to do when you're in a sole proprietorship by redwoodtree · · Score: 1

    If you care about the company or other fellows then you would give them plenty of notice, make sure they find a replacement and do all you can to train that replacement.

    Of course, if they'd totally screwed you over you wouldn't be having these reservations about leaving, so it sounds like you respect these people.

    Don't screw them by leaving them hanging.